HomeMy WebLinkAbout112800 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
NOVEMBER 28, 2000 - 7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.-
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
R:~Agenda\112800
Mayor Jeff Stone
Amanda Madrid
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2000-14
Resolution: No. 2000-76
Invocation:
Pastor Steven Leinhos of New Community Lutheran Church
Flag Salute:
Councilman Pratt
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 2000.
3 Resolution approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\112800
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
Liability Insurance Renewal
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve the City of Temecula Liability Insurance Policy Renewal with Insurance
Company of the West in the amount of $113,170 for general liability and automobile
physical damage insurance for the period of December 1, 2000 through December
1, 2001.
5
6
First Amendment to the Agreement with Melad and Associates
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve a First Amendment to the agreement with Melad and Associates in the
amount of $40,000;
5.2 Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $4,000.00.
Public Works Maintenance Aqreements
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve the minor maintenance and construction agreements with Monteleone
Contractors, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $100,000, with Walter K. Becker (dba
Becker Engineering) in an amount not to exceed $100,000, and with Rene's
Commercial Management in an amount not to exceed $100,000.
Purchase of a Portable, Self-Contained Vacuum Catch Basin Cleaner for the Public,
Works Maintenance Division
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the purchase of a portable, self-contained vacuum catch basin cleaner in
the amount of $48,847.43 from Ditch Witch of Southern California.
Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Temecula's Electric Liqht Parade on December
1, 2000, and delegate authority to issue Special Events/Street Closures Permit to the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:V~genda\112800
3
9
10
11
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ~ AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET
CLOSURES FOR JEFFERSON AVENUE AND ABUTTING
STREETS FROM DEL RIO ROAD TO OVERLAND AVENUE
FOR TEMECULA'S ELECTRIC LIGHT PARADE ON
DECEMBER 1, 2000, AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A SPECIAL
EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING STREET CLOSURES
Trees for the Millennium Grant Application for FY 2000-2001
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Receive and file the report regarding the City's Trees for the Millennium Grant
Application for the planting of street trees within the Winchester Creek Development
and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to the
California Depadment of Forestry and Fire Protection;
9.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION
FOR THE URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM AS
PROVIDED THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA TREES FOR THE
MILLENNIUM INITIATIVE FUNDED THROUGH THE FOREST
RESOURCE IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE WINCHESTER
CREEK DEVELOPMENT
Second Amendment to aqreement with Davidson + Allen Architects City Maintenance
Facility Modifications - Phase III - Project No. PW00-16
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the second amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement between the
City and Davidson + Allen Architects, increasing the contract amount by $9,549.02.
Tract Map No. 29286 - Findinq of Conformance with its oriqinal approval (located on the
southeast corner of Date Street and Marqarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve Tract Map No. 29286 in conformance with the conditions of approval;
11.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
R:~Agenda\112800
4
11.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bond as security for
the agreements.
12 Benefit Allotment Chanqe - Effective January 1, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve an increase of the City of Temecula employee benefit monthly allotment
from $496 to $650, effective January 1, 2001. This increase is intended to keep the
Temecula's benefit package competitive and to offset the ever-rising costs of
medical, dental, and vision plan inflation.
13
Calle Medusa - Results of Residential Survey
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Accept the survey results received from residents living on or near Calle Medusa;
abandon the concept of closing this roadway to through traffic; and continue
ongoing enforcement of existing traffic laws in this area.
14
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2000-13 - Rezoninq approximately 32.6 acres of
property on the south side of State Route 79 (South) east of Jedediah Smith Road; Adopt
a resolution approvinFI a General Plan Amendment removinq the western portion of Via
Rio Temecula from the General Plan Circulation Element; and approve a Settlement and
Release Aqreement between the City and Old Vail Partners
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79
(SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006 AND ADDING
SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0261)
14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL
PLAN OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REMOVING THE
WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0371)
R:~Agenda\112800
5
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~Agenda\112800
6
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2000-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2000-17
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero
ROLLCALL:
DIRECTORS:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item no__t on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be flied with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, p~ease
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 2000.
2
Award of Construction Contract for Rancho California Sports Park Field Liqhting -
Project No. PW00-19CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Award a contract for Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting - Project No.
PW00-19CSD to MacKenzie Electric, Inc. (MEI, Inc.) for $494,990.00 and
authorize the President to execute the contract;
2.2
Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $49,499.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount;
R:~Agenda\112800
7
2.3 Approve an appropriation in the amount of $105,000.00 from the Community
Services District Fund Balance.
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Community Services District
before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition
to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of
the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered
to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
3
Tract Map No. 23513 - Service Level B - Proposed Residential Street Liqhtinq Rates and
Charqes
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING,
CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON JANUARY 18, 2001 REGARDING SERVICE LEVEL B
RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 23513 IN ORDER TO
ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES
BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6, OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
3.2
Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return
and Tabulation of the ballots;
3.3
Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the
aforementioned process.
Tract Map No. 29036 - Service Level B - Proposed Residential Street Lighting Rates
and Charqes
(Continued from the November 14, 2000, City Council meeting)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\112800
8
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING,
CALLING, AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON JANUARY 18, 200t REGARDING SERVICE LEVEL B
RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP NO. 29036 IN
ORDER TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND
CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 PURSUANT
TO ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6, OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
4.2 Approve the election notice, ballot, and procedures for the completion, return,
and tabulation of the ballots;
4.3 Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant
to the aforementioned process.
DEPARTMENT REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, December 12, 2000, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\112800
9
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2000-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2000-07
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk..
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
4.4 Approve the minutes of November 14, 2000.
DEPARTMENT REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, December 12, 2000, City Council Chambers, 43200 Bus~ness Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\112800
10
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15 Temecu]a Ridqe Reconsideration
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Reconsider previous denial of the Temecula Ridge project.
16 Consideration of Emerqency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP)
(Placed on the agenda by Councilman Pratt)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Consider steps as recommended by Councilmember Pratt in his letters of October
10, 2000 (ETCP Plan) and November 6, 2000.
17 Discussion of the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan
Alternatives Development Document
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt Alternative No. 1 as the preferred alternative and direct the City Clerk to
forward the minute order stating the Council's decision to the Western Riverside
Council of Governments prior to December 4, 2000.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, December 12, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~,genda\112800
11
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 10, 2000
The City Council convened in a Closed Session at 5:30 P.M. and reconvened in a regular
meeting at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, October 10, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of
Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Present:
Councilmembers: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, and Stone.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Jennifer Taft.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Sofia Sadler of Harvester Church of Temecula.
ALLEGIANCE
The salute to the Flag was led by Councilman Pratt.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Mr. Pat Vesey and Mr. Jack Grimsley, representing Best of the Best, thanked the City
Council for its support of the recent Temecula Revisited Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues event
in Old Town and as well acknowledged the individuals involved in making this a successful
event, noting that the Old Town merchants seemed to be pleased with the event.
B. Ms. Adrian McGregor, 34555 Madera de Playa, requested that a letter be sent from the
City to other cities, requesting that their support of opposition to the placement of power lines,
that such letter be placed on the City's Website, and that additional advertising of the letter be
placed at local businesses and in local newspapers.
City Manager Nelson referenced the letter of opposition the City had previously sent to
SDG&E with regard to the issue, noting that it had been placed on the City's Website.
C. Presenting Concert on the Green memorabilia to the City Council, Ms. Martha Minkler
and Mr. Jon Laskin, P.O. Box 954, representing the Arts Council, extended a thank you for the
City's support; noted that the Duck Pond was a wonderful location for the event; advised that
public participation was exceptional; advised that the Philharmonic will be playing at next year's
event; and suggested that a Swing Jazz Festival be considered for next year.
D. Ms. Julie Watts, 42163 Rubicon Circle, commented on her desire that the City develop
at a lower density, acquire more open space, green belt areas, and parks.
E. Ms. Ana Vlahos, 30600 Feather Court, commented on the City's continued growth and
its impacts on traffic and schools and requested that the City develop at a lower density.
R:\Minutes\101000
1
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Referencing his Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP), Councilman Pratt
commented on statistics relative to the City's increased traffic and requested that the matter be
agendized for the next City Council meeting.
B. Advising that Councilman Pratt and he are working on a SMART Shuttle type system for
the City, Councilman Roberts noted that efforts are underway to aid in the transportation of
school children, advising that on October 18, 2000, a meeting has been scheduled with a RTA
representative and a School District representative. Mr. Roberts stated that he would provide a
City Council update within a month.
C. Councilman Naggar thanked those who participated in the worthwhile, regional Make a
Difference Day program.
D. Commenting on the high public participation at the Trails Master Plan, Councilman
Naggar as well addressed the excellent response of the citizen survey and advised that the next
workshop will be at the Community Recreation Center on Saturday, October 28, 2000 at 10:00
A.M., welcoming the public to attend.
E. Advising that Councilman Roberts and he attended a Transportation Conference (Rail
Volution) in Denver, Colorado, Mayor Pro Tern Comemhero noted that although the primary
focus of the conference was rail transportation, other issues of discussion pertained to mass
transit, commenting on the Walking School Bus method utilized in Brisbane, Australia, and
encouraging the City to explore innovative solutions.
F. Both Councilmembers Naggar and Pratt relayed their concurrence with exploring
innovative ideas such as the Walking School Bus.
G. At this time, Mayor Stone advised that Agenda Item No. 6 (Purchase of Microsoft Office
2000 Professional) will be continued to the October 24, 2000, City Council meeting and that
Agenda Item No. 8 (Margarita Road Widening) would be pulled for separate discussion.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standa~ O~inance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motionto waivethe reading ofthetext ofallo~inancesandresolutionsincludedinthe
agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of July 18, 2000;
2.2 Approve the minutes of July 25, 2000;
2.3 Approve the minutes of August 1, 2000;
R:\Minutes\101000
2
2.4 Approve the minutes of August 8, 2000;
2.5 Approve the minutes of August 22, 2000.
3 Resolution Approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 2000.
5 Pumhase of large Format Scanner
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Authorize the purchase of a large format scanner for Records Management and GIS
for use in scanning blue prints, plans, maps, and other large documents that require
retention by the City from DLT Solutions, Inc. of Herndon, Virginia, in the amount of
$30,243.27.
6 Purchase of Microsoft Office 2000 Professional
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Authorize the purchase of 165 licenses of Microsoft Office 2000 Professional Suite
from Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc., Riverside, California, in the amount of
$33,090.02.
(Continued to the October 24, 2000, City Council meeting.)
7 Authorize temporary partial street closures for the Race for the Cure Event, October 22,
2000 in the Promenade Mall area (Margarita Road, Solana Way, Ynez Road, and
Overland Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Minutes\101000
3
8
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTIAL STREET
CLOSURES FOR INLAND EMPIRE RACE FOR THE CURE
EVENT ON OCTOBER 22, 2000, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL
EVENT
(Councilman Naggar encouraged the public to attend this event.)
Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bids for
Margarita Road Widen n.q - Phase I - Project No. PW99-01
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit construction bids for Margarita Road Widening - Phase I -
Project No. PW99-01.
(Pulled for separate discussion; see page 5-6.)
9
Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bids for
Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-17 - Jefferson Avenue Pavement
Rehabilitation
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit construction bids for Pavement Management System -
Project No. PW99-17 - Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation.
10 Modification No. 2 to Assistance Aqreement No. AG8J5000051 - U.S. Department of
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs & City of Temecula - Pala Road Br d.qe mprovement
Project- Project No. PW97-15
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve Modification No. 2 to Agreement No. AG8J5000051 between the U.S.
Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and City of Temecula
providing for a total amount not to exceed $5,622,293.00.
11 Award of Construction Contract for the Pala Road Bridge Landscape Environmental
Mitigation/Median & Parkway Landscaping - Proiect No. PW97-15 (Landscape)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Award a construction contract for the Pala Road Bridge Landscape - Project No.
PW97-15 (Landscape) to Diversified Landscape Co. for a base amount of
$174,961.75 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
R:~vlinutes\101000
4
11.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $17,496.00 which is equal to 10% of the base contract
amount.
12 Amendment to Cooperative Agreement between the City of Temecula and County of
Riverside for the construction of the traffic signal and safety li,qhting improvements at
Rancho California Road and Butterfleld Stage Road - Project No. PW98-11
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve the amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside
for the installation of a traffic signal and safety lighting at the intersection of Rancho
California Road and Butterfield Stage Road - Project No. PW98-11;
12.2 Approve an advance of $33,150.00 from the General Fund Reserves for the
installation of the traffic signal and safety lighting improvements in cooperation with
the previously approved Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside.
13 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2000-11 (Sign requ at ons for the Old Town Specific
Plan)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-tt
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTIONS OF
CHAPTERS III AND IV SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE OLD
TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-
0350 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT)
(Mayor Stone abstained with regard to this Item.)
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-5, 7, 9-13
(Consent Calendar Item No. 6 was continued and Item No. 8 was considered for separate
discussion). The motion was seconded by Councilman Roberts and voice vote 'reflected
approval with the exception of Mayor Stone who abstained with regard to Consent Calendar
Item No. 13.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION
8
Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bid,-,
for Margar ta Road Widening - Phase I - Project No. PW99-01
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Margarita Road Widening - Phase
I - Project No. PW99-01.
R:~vlinutes\101000
5
Public Works Director Hughes presented the staff report (of record).
Ms. Juliet-Anne: Boysen, 44040 Margarita Road, relayed her concerns with regard to the widening
of Margarita Road as it relates to access to her business as well as the reconstruction of her
existing fence.
Advising that the work in this area has been conducted by a private developer/contractor not the
City, Public Works Director Hughes advised the City's contract with the developer includes a
provision, requiring the maintenance of access at all times to adjacent properties. With regard to
Ms. Boysen's fencing, Mr. Hughes noted that the fence currently encroaches into the public right-of-
way for this widening project; that provisions for the removal of the fence are underway; and that
once these provisions have been completed, the property owner will be contacted.
City Attomey Thorson advised that Ms. Boysen's attorney has been contacted with regard to the
issue, noting that the fence is located on City property and that he will further discuss the matter
with Ms. Boysen's attorney.
Speaking in support of Ms. Boysen's request to have her fence reconstructed, Mr. Dale Carothers,
44060 Margarita Road, requested that the matter be resolved prior to the Holiday season and that
the fence be reconstructed in its existing condition.
Mayor Stone requested that the matter be agendized for a Closed Session.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve the staff recommendation for Consent Calendar
Item No. 8. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
At 7:37 P.M., the City Council reconvened as the Temecula Community Services District and the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 7:46 P.M., Mayor Stone called a short recess and resumed
the City Council meeting at 8:00 P.M. with regularly scheduled City Council business.
PUBLIC HEARING
14 Planning Application No.99-0317 (Appeal of Development Plan) - Temecula Ridqc,
Apartments (located on the south side of Rancho California Road, southeast of thc,
intersection of Rancho California Road and Mora,qa Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Vlinutes\101000
6
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0317 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND
UPHOLDING THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION, FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OF A 246-UNIT, TWO-
AND THREE-STORY APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH POOL,
CLUBHOUSE, WORKOUT BUILDING, AND TOT LOT ON 20.88
NET ACRES, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD, SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-01t, BASED
UPON THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE
STAFF REPORT AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,
AND ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
RELATED THERETO
Advising that the project had been appealed by Councilman Nagger, Mayor Stone reviewed
established ground rules for the applicant, members of the public, and City Councilmembers;
noted that Planning Director Ubnoske will present the staff report; that the property owner and
applicant and representatives will be given the opportunity to address the City Council; that
members of the public who support the project will be given the opportunity to speak (limited to
five minutes each); that then members of the public who oppose the project will be given an
opportunity to speak (limited to five minutes each); and that the applicant and his
representatives will be given the opportunity to rebut. Following each presentation or speaker,
Mayor Stone advised that the City Councilmembers may address questions.
Advising that the City Council has received two sets of objections from the applicant's attorneys,
contending that the appeal is invalid because a Notice of Appeal does not comply with the
provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code and that City Councilman Naggar should not
participate in the appeal because he has filed it, City Attorney Thorson noted that having
reviewed the correspondence from the applicant's attorneys and having researched the
objections, his opinion would be that the Notice of Appeal complies with all the requirements of
the Temecula Municipal Code for appeal and that Councilman Naggar may participate in the
hearing because the Temecula Municipal Code specifically authorizes appeals by City
Councilmembers and because Mr. Naggar's appeal does not express a position or opinion on
the merits of the appeal. Mr. Thorson stated that this particular procedure has been utilized in
two previous City Council appeals in 1997 and 1998.
City Attorney Thorson noted that the record before the City Council is extensive; that it contains
a study submitted to the City by the applicant, staff analysis of the project and its impacts,
applicant's analysis of the project and its impacts, the Planning Commission minutes of the
hearings of the project, and the recommended findings for approval and advised that the
Temecula Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to affirm, reverse, or modify the Planning
Commission action; that the Code also provides that the City Council may take any action that
the Planning Commission may have taken on this project in the first instance. VVhatever action
the City Council may decide to take with respect to this project, Mr. Thorson stated that the City
Council must justify its decision with written findings based on the facts which are contained in
the record.
R:~4inutes\101000
7
Mr. Thorson as well advised that copies of the following have been provided to the City Council
and will be considered as part of the record: a copy of Mr. Alhadeffs letter dated May 8,
September 25, and October 10, 2000; a copy of Mr. Edmonds letter dated October 5, and
October '10, 2000; and a copy of Mr. Thorson's letter to the City Council responding to these
concerns.
Councilman Naggar reiterated that he had appealed this project because, in his opinion, a
project of this magnitude should be considered by the City Council; stated that he has not made
a decision on the project; and noted that after all the testimony has been presented, he will
make an educated decision.
At this time, Planning Director Ubnoske presented, in detail, the staff report (of record), noting
the following:
· That approximately 43.2% of the subject site will be landscaped; that the City's
Development Code requires a minimum of 25% landscaping;
· That the proposed project would be an extremely high-quality project;
· That the applicant is proposing 11.7 units per acre; that the General Plan
designation for this site is medium density with a range of 7 to 12 dwelling units
per acre; that the proposed project would be at the lesser density range of any
other approved apartment complexes in the City;
· That at the Iow end of the density range, the site would accommodate 146 units
and at the high end, the site would accommodate 251 units, noting that
construction at minimum density would not be feasible for the developer;
· That as per the General Plan, target density provisions do not apply to the
medium/high density designations;
· That the proposed use will be in conformance with the Zoning Code, noting that
multi-family housing is permitted in medium residential and that the City does not
currently have multi-family in existing medium density zones;
· That the City's Housing Element has been based on a calculation at the high end
of the medium density and the high-density zoning designations;
· That the project was approved by the Planning Commission on August 16, 2000
with a 3-1-1 vote with Planning Commissioner Mathewson voting for denial and
Commissioner Webster abstaining;
· That those Planning Commissioners who voted in support of the project did so
for the following reasons:
o High quality project which will provide substantial amenities in
conformance with the Growth Management Plan;
o Swimming pool will be utilized by the Swim Club;
o Other on-site amenities such as a tot lot, pool, barbeque area will lessen
impacts on other City parks;
o Provides diversity of housing and has been conditioned to provide for 2%
of Affordable Housing;
· That the Planning Commissioner speaking in opposition to the project noted the
following concerns:
o Amount of on-site grading;
o insufficient amenities to warrant higher density
o View impacts from Rancho California Road
In conclusion, it was noted that staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal and
uphold the Planning Commission's approval of the project.
R:~Minutes\101000
8
For Councilman Roberts, Planning Director Ubnoske noted that there are no other three-story
apartments in the City of Temecula.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Planning Director Ubnoske provided information as to which
amenities of the General Plan (Policy 5.1) are provided by this project, commenting on the
additional amount of landscaping, Olympic-sized pool, widening and improvement of Moraga
Road, three-way signal to a full signal, and a bus turnout. Ms. Ubnoske noted that she would
have to check as to whether the proposed 2% of Affordable Housing will meet State
requirements. With regard to the 50% Quimby Fee Reduction, Ms. Ubnoske noted that multi-
family complex developments are entitled to a reduction in Quimby fees; that the Subdivision
Ordinance refers to subdivisions; that subdivisions may be multi-family developments, which
allow for higher density on small lots; that the Development Plan meets the Quimby
requirements and, therefore, is entitled to a 50% credit because of the amount of open space
and the amenities being provided, noting that an apartment would not be considered a
subdivision.
Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse provided information with regard to the City's
Quimby Ordinance, which is an extrapolation of the State's Quimby Act, which reflects that any
residential development may receive Quimby credit and must meet Quimby requirements. Ms.
Ruse advised that other apartment complexes throughout the City have adhered to the same
process and noted that the 50% Quimby fees for this particular project would amount to
$135,000.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that it would be difficult to request a project, such as the
proposed - an in-fill development, to adhere to large-scale Specific Plan Development
standards.
In response to research completed by staff at the request of Councilman Naggar, Ms. Ubnsoke
noted that approximately 191 students will reside at this complex (131 Vail Elementary School
students, 30 James L Day middle school students, and 30 Temecula Valley high school
students). Councilman Naggar expressed concern of how these students will travel to school,
particularly to the elementary school, commenting on possible traffic impacts through Starlight
Ridge to which Ms. Ubnoske noted that school capacity/availability/and travel route are issues
that are addressed by the School District, not City staff.
Providing a brief background on the reasoning of permitting multi-family housing in a medium
residential zone, Deputy City Manager Thornhill commented on City staff efforts, dudng the
recession, to work with developers on development alternatives, noting that by such action the
City had reduced density by approximately 400 dwelling units. In light of the location of the
particular site and its immediate adjacent properties (commercial and apartments), Mr. Thorhnill
stated that staff was of the opinion that the proposed project would be appropriate, noting that
this would be the City's fourth multi-family housing application since incorporation.
in response to Councilman Naggar, Planning Director Ubnoske addressed the following issues:
· Noise impacts - because some of the proposed units are within close proximity
to Rancho California Road, a noise study was completed and mitigation
measures were provided to ensure interior compliance with the General Plan's
provision of 45 decibels, noting that for a mixture of ground floor units (those
closest to Rancho California Road) fixed windows (unable to open) will be
installed;
· Landscaping - landscaping requirement for this project would be 25%;
· Traffic study - study addresses other developments on Rancho California Road.
R:~Vlinutes\101000
9
At Mayor Stone's request, Planning Commissioner Mathewson articulated his concerns with
regard to this project, commenting on the following:
· Amount of grading
· View impact of the three-story structure, noting removal of the bottom floor
(garage) was discussed but it was mentioned that such removal would have
impact on open space as well as on landscaping; removal of the garage level as
well prompted discussion with regard to safety and carports;
· Provisions of on-site recreation facility - amenities provided would not meet the
criteria of the Growth Management Plan;
· Quimby Fee requirements - applicant should provide 100% of the Quimby Fees
to the City, noting that if the applicant were to pay 100% of the Quimby Fees, one
of his concerns with regard to this project would be addressed;
· Roadway improvements were discussed as an amenity; widening of Moraga
Road would solely benefit the access to the project site; traffic mitigations
proposed would not provide a community-wide benefit with the exception of
some benefit to the immediate area behind the Medical Center
· Growth Management Plan was a primary consideration in his denial of this
project but another issue of concern would relate to view impact, referencing the
existing ridgeline.
With regard to the proposed amenities and how they relate to the General Plan, Planning
Director Ubnoske, for Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero, advised that staff would view the garages,
the Olympic-sized pool, the amount of open space, the road improvements a City-wide benefit.
For Councilman Pratt, Ms. Ubnoske noted that the proposed project would adhere to the height
requirements of the zone as per the City's Development Code, noting that the General Plan
does not address height requirements.
With regard to the proposed three-story structure, Deputy City Manager Thornhill reiterated that
the Development Code identifies minimum ceiling height and advised that a three-story
structure (garages on the bottom level) would minimize the impacts remaining area, noting that
lowering the height and spreading the units out would significantly require more grading, lot
coverage, and loss of open space.
It was noted by staff that if this application were denied, the applicant could apply for a new
application to develop a Iow-moderate income development and, thereby, construct one and a
half times above the highest density allowed by the General Plan (18 units per acre).
Confirming the above-noted comment, City Attorney Thorson advised that under the Density
Bonus Statute of the Government Code, a Iow-moderate income housing project would be
entitled to a density bonus, restricting the units to the affordability requirements of the
Government Code, compliance with the Quimby Act requirements, and minimum requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance but not require the construction of a recreation center, a pool,
additional landscaping, barbeque pit, etc. Mr. Thorson stated that the City Council would as
well be required to provide additional findings in denying a Iow-moderate income housing
project and, thereby, making it more difficult to deny.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill addressed infrastructure,
commenting on the City's General Plan indicates an approximate total of 112,000 units, noting
that this figure has been reduced through City staff efforts and advised that in light of past
reductions, the City is actually under the allowable units as per the General Plan. Although
confident with the City's land uses, Mr. Thornhill did not display the same confidence with
R:~vlinutes\101000
10
County projects, noting that approximately 45,000 to 50,000 dwelling units are to be constructed
in the French Valley area.
City Attorney Thorson, for Councilman Pratt, clarified that this developer would not be required
to set aside units for Iow and moderate housing.
At this time, Mayor Stone opened the public hearing and invited the applicant and his
representatives to speak.
Referencing his pamphlet entitled the proposed development Temecula Ridge Apartment
homes (copies of which were presented to the City Council), Mr. Sam Alhadeff, 41530
Enterprise Circle South, counsel for the applicant, presented a copy of the pamphlet to the City
Clerk as part of the record; addressed the City's procedural process for developing a piece of
property within the City, noting that the applicant has adhered to this process and advising that it
has been a two-year process. Further addressing the project, Mr. Alhadeff noted the following:
· That the plan was originally submitted in June 1999 at which time after
discussions with staff, redesigns, field trips, etc., it had been determined that the
project would not be constructed as a Iow-moderate housing project;
That on March 14, 2000, the project application process was deemed complete;
· That the Growth Management Plan was discussed on March 21, 2000 by the City
Council (a week after the project was deemed complete);
· That on May 2, 2000, a memo to the Planning Department staff was sent, by
Senior Management Analyst Brown, apprising them of the official version of the
Growth Management Plan (two months after the completion of the project
planning);
· That on May 3, 2000, the Planning Commission begins its discussions with
regard to the Temecula Ridge project; at which time, the issue of the Growth
Management Plan was addressed; that the Commission continued the project in
June and in July; that on August 1, 2000, a joint City Council/Planning
Commission meeting was scheduled at which time the City Council requested
the Commissioners to exercise best judgment, exercise their discretion, and
exercise their knowledge; that on August 16, 2000, the Commission discussed
the project, followed the City Council's direction, added and extricated conditions,
which resulted in a 3-1-1 vote for approval; that three members of the Planning
Commission, after the joint meeting, thought this project not only qualified under
the General Plan but also under the Growth Management Plan and zoning
requirements;
· That the proposed plan is now being scrutinized by the Growth Management
Plan - a Plan which did not exist during the review process of this project and
was adopted after the completion of this project's planning process; therefore, it
raises the question of whether the Growth Management Plan should apply to this
particular project, noting that the applicant is being required to meet the
requirements of this Plan.
Referencing the minutes of the joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Alhadeff
noted that each City Councilmember had a different opinion of the term amenity; commented on
a verbatim transcript of the September 26, 2000, City Council meeting, Mr. ^lhadeff further
addressed the varying City Council views as it relates to amenities; and stated that the Growth
Management Plan should be viewed as an action plan for the City Council to implement growth
management techniques but that it should not serve as a mechanism to require projects to be
constructed at the lowest density, noting that such action would require a change in the General
Plan and that a change in the General Plan would require a CEQA process. If this project were
R:\Minutes\101000
11
denied, Mr. AIhadeff addressed the State's Bonus Density for Iow-moderate housing and
advised that such housing would create one and a half times the number of proposed units. In
response to Councilman Naggar's appeal as it relates to the magnitude of this project, Mr.
Alhadeff noted that this project meets the General Plan requirements; that this project is a plot
plan; and that this project was a consensual project.
Mr. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, representing the applicant, addressed the project,
noting the following:
· That vacant land to the east is zoned Professional/Office and another medium
multi-family project further to the east;
· To the south, there are existing duplexes - high density (12 - 20 units per acre);
· To the west, Summer Breeze Apartments (12 - 20 units per acre);
· Additional vacant land zoned Professional/Office;
· Small commercial center with a car wash, existing chumh, elementary school;
· Another apartment project (12 - 20 units per acre);
· Portofino project which was approved by the County just prior to incorporation
(12 - 20 units per acre);
· Project abuts two single-family lots, part of Alta Vista, which has been a major
focus of staff's direction as to how to design this project.
Providing additional background information with regard to this property, Mr. Markham stated
the following:
· Actually zoned for multi-family residential in 1985 by the County, which permitted
up to 17.42 units per acre (386 units);
· August 8, 1989, approval by the Planning Director for 335 units; project appealed
by the Oder family but ultimately approved by the City Council as a 265-unit
project;
· Three or four other apartment projects have been approved in the City after
incorporation; these projects were not built and ultimately were recycled as two of
the new apartment projects plus the ultimate construction of the Portofino project;
· Extensive research by the applicant, consultant, and staff including the review of
similar projects as it relates to site design, grading, drainage, architecture;
· Olympic-sized pool would be available to the Swim Club, specifics have not been
finalized; Councilman Naggar suggested that the usage of the pool be regulated
by the Community Services Department; Mr. Alhadeff advised that there will not
be a fee associated with the usage of the pool with the exception of intense use
of chemicals, etc.;
· Public spaces provided to the residents of this project - recreation areas, tot lots,
and barbeque spaces;
· Added conditions - widening of the right-of-way on Rancho California Road and
providing a bus turnout and widening of Moraga Road to provide an additional
lane of traffic;
· Planning Commission conditioned the 2% Iow/moderate and/or senior-income
housing (5 to 6 units) and that the applicant had agreed;
· Quimby Fee Reduction - a standard provision and qualitative by the Community
Services Department;
- School availability/location - applicant has no control of where the School District
draws its boundaries, noting boundaries could change at any point in time;
· In order to address staff's concerns relative to acoustics on the north side of the
project and view shed on the south side, additional grading was necessary;
R:\Minutes\101000
12
Would be willing to accept a condition lowering the roof pitch;
Distance between the two single-family homes and the nearest three-story
building would 250';
Initial traffic study was completed to encompass the proposed project as well as
a proposed project to the east; that the project to the east has not come to
fruition and, therefore, at staff's request, a separate traffic study was completed;
that the extension of Rancho Way had not been considered in the traffic study for
this particular project.
Mr. Alhadeff addressed the legal aspects of nexus and noted that the applicant exceeded has
exceeded his legal requirements.
Addressing the nexus issue, City Attorney Thorson noted that he would split the issue, noting
that some nexus requirements were met to accommodate the impacts of the project and other
proposed road improvements will be above and beyond what would be required to mitigate the
impacts of this project.
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero's request of the applicant to provide shuttle/bus
service, Mr. Alhadeff advised that the applicant would be willing to accept an additional
condition, requesting the applicant to work with the School District with City assistance to
accommodate such a shuttle specifically to the elementary school.
Concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero's recommendation of a shuttle, Councilman Pratt
noted that such traffic circulation solutions should be addressed with all future projects.
At this time, Mayor Stone invited those individuals in support of the project to speak, noting that
there will be a five-minute time limit.
Commenting on the shortage of pools and pool time, Mr. Bruce Furniss, representing Unites
States Swimming/Southern California Swimming, referenced his letter of support, dated May 2,
2000, to the Planning Commission and commented on the positive impacts sports has on an
entire community.
In response to Mr. Furniss, Councilman Naggar advised that two Olympic-sized pools are being
constructed -- one by the City in conjunction with the School District and one is being
considered by the County in Vail Ranch.
Commenting on the need for apartment housing and on the long-waiting lists for such housing,
Ms. Michelle Ash, 31370 Paseo de las Olas, as a single mom, spoke in support of the project.
Ms. Evelyn Hughes, 27475 Ynez Road, senior citizen, commented on the amenities which the
proposed project would provide in particular the garage; addressed the need for apartment
housing within the City; and encouraged the City Council to support the project.
Mr. John Fili, representing Southwest Riverside County Manufacturing Council, as well
commented on the need for apartment housing and addressed the difficulty of businesses to
attract certain types of employees because of the lack of available apartment housing.
Referencing a letter, dated October 4, 2000, (copies were sent to the City Councilmembers), Mr.
John Fili, an employee for Solid State Stamping, readdressed the difficulty in recruiting
employees because of the lack of apartment housing, the reduction in the vacancy rate for
affordable apartments, and the growth and average cost of rental property. Mr. Fill spoke in
support of the project and requested the City Council to approve the project.
R:\Minutes\101000
13
Although sympathetic to the need for additional apartment housing, Councilman Naggar noted
that he would not view the proposed project as affordable housing and commented on the fact
that two-thirds of the City's residents commute to their jobs.
Addressing the Iow vacancy rate, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero commented on the lack of
apartment housing and, therefore, limiting places to live for individuals who work in the City,
viewing that as a traffic generator.
Mrs. Helen Oder, 29911 Mira Loma Drive, provided information with regard to previous denials
with regard to this site; commended the City on its accomplishments; and relayed her support of
the project.
Mr. Robert Oder, 2911 Mira Loma Drive, spoke in support of the project and commended the
applicant on the provided amenities.
Mr. Robert Oder, Jr., 29911 Mira Loma Drive, (Oder family owners of the property to the south
of the subject site) advised that the proposed project would be located immediately above his
property; that his family would be the most affected property owners; commented on the need
for additional apartment housing in the City; provided background information with regard to a
previously proposed development for the subject site; addressed Iow-moderate income and
associated impacts; and noted that the proposed project would not create a densely populated
development; and, therefore, encouraged the City Council to approve the project.
Mr. Wayne Hall, 42101 Moraga Road, representing the First Baptist Church, advised that the
Church has taken no position with regard to this item.
At 10:25 P.M., Mayor Stone called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 10:32 P.M. at which
time, individuals in opposition of the project were invited to speak.
Mr. Clark Kegley, 41796 Humber Drive, representing the Village Homeowners Association,
relayed the Association's concerns with regard to the proposed density which would not be
consistent with managed growth, impact on property values, local traffic, and schools. Although
not opposing the development of the subject site, Mr. Kegley noted his preference for single-
family homes or a development closer to the 7 units per acre range.
Addressing the City Council as the current President of the Starlight Ridge Homeowners
Association, Mr. Mike Burton, 30366 Santa Cecilia, relayed the Association's concerns with
regard to the proposed project, as follows:
· Site best suited in current medium-density residential use (Iow end of 7 dwelling
units per acre, not 246 units);
· Site best suited for single-family homes/condos or any other application than the
proposed density for apartments;
· Too many apartments within one mile of the proposed area;
· Current impact of student access to Vail Elementary School on Starlight Ridge.
Addressing the City Council as a resident, Mr. Burton noted the following concerns with the
proposed project:
· Increased traffic and increased students attending Vail Elementary and,
· therefore, increased impact on Starlight Ridge;
R:\Minutes\101000
14
· Too many apartments within one mile of the proposed area; opposes an
apartment complex for the proposed site;
· Current Vail Elementary traffic situation is a dangerous situation.
Mr. Burlie Cole, 42567 Remora Street, representing Alta Vista Community Association, relayed
the Association's concerns, noting the following:
· Worsening of current traffic conditions and speeds;
· Slope slippage/destruction of vegetation;
· Children vandalism;
· Trading amenities for high density is a no-win situation.
Ms. Robyn Wright, 42415 Carino Place, addressed Land Use, referencing Chapter 2
(Preparation of Land Use Element) and Chapter 17.06 of the Temecula City Development Plan
(criteria for acceptable public amenities in order to increase project density), noting that the
proposed project violates policies of that Chapter as it relates to size, bulk, and configuration.
She advised that the proposed apartments, in her opinion, would not meet the definition of
medium-density housing per Chapter 17.06 of the Development Plan and stated that the
proposed project would as well not comply with 17.06.050 of the Development Plan (not
meeting amenity requirements), noting that the project would only offer amenities to the
occupants, that only 1% of the total occupants would be granted a reduced rate and, therefore,
being of the opinion that the proposed project would only attract high-paying customers.
Ms. Pamela Miod, 31995 Via Saltio, addressed the Open Space and Conservation Element
(Chapter 5) of the City's General Plan, noting that this Element encourages the conservation
and proper management of the community's resources and to ensure the provision of parks and
recreation. Referencing figure§ 5-3, 5-6, and 5-7, Ms. Miod noted that the land site of
discussion is a sensitive habitat to coastal sage scrub and is an archeological sensitive area.
Referring to the Community Design Element, Ms. Miod discussed Goal No. 1 (land use and
development decisions capitalize on and monitor the natural assets of a given location), noting
that the preservation of the remaining hill sides and ridge lines of the City and of the surrounding
area is important to many residents which results in a more enjoyable and satisfying urban
environment. Ms. Miod proceeded with discussing Policy 1.1 (promote the development of a
comprehensive system of trails and open space areas to connect schools, public recreation
areas, residential areas, and commercial centers) and Policy 1.5 (maintain and incorporate
natural amenities into the development project to protect the environment and provide natural
landscaping, protect views, and to provide recreational opportunities). In conclusion, Ms. Miod
stated that although the property of discussion is zoned M (medium residential), it currently
functions as a proper buffer for the single-family homes in Starlight Ridge and Alta Vista.
Because of the unique topography and habitat of this property, it would be impossible for the
developer to adequately mitigate the associated damages of an apartment complex, noting that
the General Plan requires that all seven Chapters must be equally considered and noting that
as per Government Code Section 65860 and 65567, one Chapter may not be mitigated over
another. She, therefore, requested that the property of discussion be adopted into the Open
Space and Conservation Plan as a protected area.
Viewing it as a safety concern, Ms. Miod expressed concern with the proposed closed
windows for those units facing Rancho California Road.
Addressing Chapter 10 (Community Design), Mr. Scott Bruce, 41395 Rue Jadot, noted that the
proposed project would not adhere to the existing goals and policies, specifically with regard to
Goal No. 3 (Preservation of the character of the single-family neighborhoods and protection
from intrusion from buildings that are out of scale and incompatible land uses and excessive
R:~linutes\101000
15
vehicular traffic); referenced Policy 3.2 (Preserve the scale and character of the residential
development by creating appropriate transitions between lower density and rural areas and
higher density development); and referenced Goal No. 5 (Protection of public view of significant
natural features). Mr. Bruce noted that apartment complexes, in his opinion, never enhance the
designs or character of a single-family neighborhood.
Ms. Nyrene Smith, 30090 Lavande Place, addressed air quality issues as it pertains to Chapter
9, Goal No. 1, of the General Plan; referenced Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of Goal No. 1 (to minimize
land use conflicts between emission sources and sensitive receptors or single-family homes and
to reduce air pollution emissions by mitigating air quality impacts associated with the
development projects to the greatest extent feasible). Ms. Smith requested that the project be
rejected and that the site of discussion be limited to single-family homes, a school, a park, a
church, a horse ranch, or open space.
Although not relevant to the matter, Ms. Smith requested that the City Council consider
providing more entertainmentJnight life in the City for people her age.
Addressing Chapter 8 of the General Plan with regard to noise and its affects on sensitive
receptors or single-family homes, Ms. Nannette Kosonen, 30090 Levande Place, noted that, in
her opinion, locating apartments next to single-family homes is a violation of Goal No. 1 of the
General Plan.
Ms. Kosonen referenced Policies 1.1 and 1.8 (discourages the placement of noise
generators near sensitive receptors) and Goal No. 2 (control noise between land uses) and
Policy 2.1 (limit noise between property lines). Noting that as per Goal Nos. 3 and 4, Ms.
Kosonen noted that the Planning Department is required to protect single-family homes from
noise impacts, stating that apartment complexes due to their structure and density could only be
classified as noise generators. She requested that the City Council uphold the General Plan
and reject the project and encourage the construction of single-family homes.
Ms. Michelle Anderson, 43797 Barletta Street, representing Citizens First of Temecula Valley,
noted that the residents in the City of Temecula are not desirous of any future high-density
developments and that the Planning Department has a responsibility to relay that to the
developers in the early planning stages. Expressing concern with regard to zoning and housing
types, Ms. Anderson referenced Chapter 17, Section 6, (e) of the General Plan (medium-density
residential) and Chapter 17.06.020 (f~ - high density which includes the term apartments.
Because the site of discussion is reflected on the General Plan Map as medium density, Ms.
Anderson noted that the developer should be required to build medium-density types, noting
that apartment complexes are not reflected as medium density. She as well noted that there is
no other three-story medium density type housing throughout the City.
Mr. Nancy Rich, 42403 Carino Place, referenced Chapter 6 (Growth Management of public
facilities - focusing on schools); referenced Goal No. 4 (a quality School System that contains
adequate facilities and funding to educate the youth of Temecula); referenced Policy 4.1
(provide information to Temecula Unified School District when considering General Plan
amendments, Specific Plan, zone changes, etc. in order to support the District in providing
adequate school facilities for students for new developments to the extent permitted by law);
referenced Policy 4.2 (to promote and to encourage the phasing of project development so that
the School District may plan finance and construction of school facilities intended to serve the
development); Policy 4.3 (land'use decisions); and referenced Goal No. 2 (orderly and efficiently
patterns of growth within Temecula that enhance the quality of life for residents). Not opposing
the project as a whole, Ms. Rich relayed her opposition to the location of the project.
R:\Minutes\101000
16
Mr. Randall Kosonen, 30090 Levande Place, presented to the City Clerk a 395-signature
petition in opposition of the Temecula Ridge Apartments and stated that he viewed the
proposed site as inappropriate.
Ms. May Lorah, 42189 Monte de Oro, referenced Chapter 3 (Circulation); referenced Policy 1.10
(City to pursue opportunities to locate higher-density housing with supporting commercial and
public uses on west side of Interstate 15; referenced Chapter 4 (Housing), stating that the site of
discussion should be controlled under the Transfer of Development Rights Program to ensure
the proper compatibility of the open land and neighboring single-family homes; that the
proposed structure would be inconsistent with the type of structures depicted for medium-
density sites; that a three-story apartment structure would be inconsistent with currently existing
apartment complexes; that the City has a responsibility to protect existing single-family homes
from incompatibility and devaluation of property as the result of a high-density development; and
that an appropriate use would be either condominiums, a park, or a bike trail.
Mr. Bob Eilek, 42471 Carino Place, relayed issues of concern such as high density, increased
crime, increased traffic, adverse impacts on school population and resources, restriction of
views, and devaluation of property. To his understanding, Mr. Eilek noted that the approval of
this project would indicate a violation of all nine Chapters of the City's General Plan. Mr. Eilek
noted that the site of discussion has been zoned as medium density; that apartment complexes
are not reflected as an acceptable building structure under the medium density zone; that if
approved, it would violate Policies 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.5 of the Community Design Element. In
closing, he noted that a three-story structure would be inconsistent with high density areas for
which apartments have been previously approved; that apartments would be imposing,
intrusive, and out of scale; that approval would be in violation of Goal No. 5 of the Design
Element, noting that apartments do not protect or enhance the views of the neighboring single-
family homes; that privacy would be disturbed; that property would be devalued; and, therefore,
requested that the proposed project be denied.
Appreciating the steps the City Council has taken with regard to the Growth Management Plan,
Mr. Gary Watts, 42163 Rubicon, stated that more people would mean more cars and that more
cars would mean more traffic and, therefore, requested that the City Council deny this project.
Rebuttal by the Applicant
In response to Mr. Alhadeff, City Attorney Thorson reiterated that Councilman Naggar does not
have to abstain from this matter; that the Planning Department has calculated the distance
between his home and the proposed project; that it exceeds a distance of 2,500'; and that,
therefore, as per the Political Reform Act and the regulations of the Fair Political Practices
Commission, it has been determined that Councilman Naggar may partake in the proceedings.
At the request of Mr. Alhadeff, Mr. Tom Dodson, Environmental Consultant, addressed
environmental issues with regard to this project, noting the following:
Noise issues - noise levels associated with this project reflect noise levels that may
impact the project site from the traffic of adjacent roads, not noise being generated
by this project itself; noted that noise levels within the apartment complex, because
of the way the buildings are structured around the periphery, will be no louder than
adjacent single-family residences; that fixed windows are being proposed only for
those units which face Rancho California Road; that noise levels, within the complex,
would not be significant; that if issues were to arise after construction, concerns
could be mitigated at that point in time; therefore, would not view noise levels to be in
conflict with the General Plan;
R:\Minutes\101000
17
· Air quality - that insufficient residences for individuals working in the City will
generate more air pollution; that the project site is designated for medium residential
density; and that the proposed project, even at maximum density level, would not
conflict or be inconsistent with the air quality management plan for the Basin; and
that every three years, South Coast Air Quality Management District updates its
General Plan;
· Open Space - an issue reflected in the City's adopted Open Space and
Conservation Element which addresses location of trails/parks/designated open
space; that the subject site has not been designated as Open Space; and that it was
intended to function as a medium density development;
· Traffic- traffic study for this particular project had been prepared; that it has been
determined that with the proposed short- and long-term improvements, there will be
not significant, adverse impacts on the community as a result of the proposed
project;
· Endangered species and biological resources - that the proposed site is an in-fill
parcel;'that it is a degraded habitat; that discussions have occurred with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service to address the coastal sage scrub as well as the gnat
catchers.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, referenced the Land Use Element, Table 2-8,
particularly addressing allowable uses as per the General Plan (Residential/Housing Type
Correlation) and the City's Development Code, noting that medium density is an allowable use.
With regard to the noise study, Mr. Markham clarified that the study is project specific. As per
the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP), Mr. Markham advised that in 1989, when SWAP was
adopted, the allowable units for the project site were reduced from 17.42 units per acre to a
range of 8 to 16 units per acre. As to the Starlight Ridge development, Mr. Markham noted that
the initial phase of construction began within the 1984 to 1986 timeframe at which time the
subject site was still zoned at the higher density level of 17.42 units per acre and that the White
Report would have indicated the parcel of discussion. In closing, Mr. Markham advised that he
got involved with this project in May of 1999; that Mr. Alhadeff got involved in May of 2000; and
that the swimming pool was added to the project in December 1999 or January 2000.
In closing, Mr. Alhadeff noted that the Planning Commission used its discretion in determining
the balance between greater density and amenities as was suggested by Councilman Naggar at
the August 1, 2000, joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting, briefly referencing
Planning Commission discussion with regard to that issue. Mr. Alhadeff stated that the
proposed project meets the City's rules, policies, and guidelines and thanked City staffon an
outstanding job.
City Council comments
Although viewing the proposed project as a high quality project, Councilman Roberts referenced
the adoption of the City's Growth Management Plan, stating that the proposed project would not
adhere to this Plan. With regard to the proposed Olympic pool, Mr. Roberts noted that he would
not view that as a community amenity and as to the landscaping, he noted that the topography
of the site demands the amount of proposed landscaping. In his opinion, Mr. Roberts stated
that he has not been able to determine the community amenities that are being proposed.
Concurring with Councilman Roberts' concerns as they relate to the Growth Management Plan
and also viewing it as a high quality project, Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero noted that in-fill
parcels, such as the one of discussion, create serious conflicts with the Growth Management
Plan, noting that the Plan was not formulated to address such projects and stating that this
issue must be resolved. Mr. Comerchero relayed his desire for the development of a
R:\Minutes\101000
18
condominium/townhouse project or a small lot single-family project in the range of 7 units per
acre. Although it would be a School District issue, Mr. Comerchero relayed concern with
bussing school children a substantial distance. Further addressing the project, Mr. Comerchero
noted the following:
· Expressed concern with the City's .5% vacancy rate for rental units;
· Referenced statistics as it relates to rental units within the City and the
comparison of other cities (approximately 17,007 City's housing stock of which
20.3% are apartments [3,451 units]);
· Denial of the project may result in an affordable Iow-income housing project,
noting that there are an insufficient number of multi-family units;
· Project would meet the City's demographics
· Project would not depreciate property values.
Councilman Pratt referenced his Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) of record.
Concurring with Councilmembers Comemhero and Roberts comments, Councilman Naggar
stated that a Iow-income housing project would still be required to follow the Planning
Department's approval process. Questioning what significant aspect of this project would
warrant the increased density, Councilman Naggar stated the following as it relates to the
project:
· Impacts on school overcrowding and associated traffic
· Encroachment on single-family residential not compatible with adjacent land
uses; development on the hillside, destruction of the ridgeline;
· Three-story structure not appropriate
· Impact on property values
· Incompletion of the Housing Element
· Could support the project at the lowest medium density range
· Encouraged exploration of a different use
Mayor Stone reiterated that the density of the subject site prior to the construction of Starlight
Ridge was at a higher density than what is being proposed at this time, referencing the White
Report; viewed the Growth Management Plan as a tool to address large Specific Plans, not a
20-acre parcel; noted that adjacent land uses of the project site and Starlight Ridge are
apartment buildings (multi-family) and office/professional; concurred that the view of the two
homes in Starlight Ridge should be retained; reiterated that the applicant has agreed by way of
grading and roof pitch to not affect the ridgeline for those two landowners; that traffic generation
of the proposed multi-family site would not generate the number of trips that a single-family
development of equal magnitude would generate; the site of discussion would not be, in his
opinion, an appropriate location of single-family homes; and that the completed traffic analysis
indicated levels of service C and D. Referencing consistency with the Growth Management
Plan, Mayor Stone commented on the proposed traffic improvements. In order to make the
proposed site viable, Mayor Stone noted that a Iow-moderate housing project may be presented
for review to the City Council, advising that such a project would result in one and a half times
the number of the proposed units and that no pool, recreational facility, tot lot, etc. would be
provided. Being a supporter of the Growth Management Plan, Mayor Stone stated that the
impetus of this Plan was formulated as a result of the development at the City's periphery
(County) and not the City's development. In closing, Mayor Stone commented on the need for
variable types of housing; addressed the goals of the City's General Plan; commented on how
the proposed project would comply with the goals of the General Plan; and viewed the approval
of this project to be in the City's best interest.
R:~vlinutes\101000
19
Although this project does conform to the City's General Plan, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero
noted that it does not comply with the City's Growth Management Plan; that the Growth
Management Plan does not allow the construction of an in-fill project such as the one proposed;
that, therefore, the City Council should not apply the Growth Management Plan to this project,
address the project on a standard of quality, and determine whether or not the construction of
this project would be an overall betterment to the community.
MOTION: Councilman Pratt moved to deny the project and to direct the City Attorney to
prepare a resolution and findings denying the project and upholding the appeal. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval of the motion as
follows:
AYES:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts
NOES: Stone
ABSENT: None
15 Planning Application No. PA00-0261 - a request to amend the text of the Margarita Ville?
Specific Plan, Planning Areas 8, and 10/11/12 to increase the maximum size for the
homes from 2,600 square feet to 3,700 square feet and to reduce the number of floor
plans provided from five (5) to three (3)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve the categorical exemption under Section 15061(b)(3) by making a
determination of consistency with a project for which an EIR was previously certified
per Section 15162 - subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations of the CEQA;
15.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-t2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA00-0261 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 5) TO AMEND
THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC
PLAN'S DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR VILLAGE B RELATED TO
THE SIZE AND VARIATION OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING
UNITS TO BE BUILT IN PLANNING AREAS 8 AND 10/11112
GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD OFF PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS,' EAST OF
MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF PARDUCCI LANE, AND
NORTH OF RUE JADOT CONSISTING OF ALL LOTS IN
TRACT NOS. 23100-6, -7, AND-8
Deputy City Manager Thornhill presented the staff report (as per agenda material).
At this time, Mayor Stone opened the public hearing.
Mr. Matthew Fagan, 42011 Avenida Vista Cordera, reviewed the request to increase the home
sizes in the Specific Plan, clarifying that no lots are being added; that the lot coverage for a two-
story residence would be approximately 35% to 40% and that the lot coverage for a single-story
R:\Minutes\101000
20
residence would be approximately 45%; that this request would only pertain to the remaining 79
lots; that of the 79 lots, 20 would be single-story residences; and that there are a variety of
home sizes within the Margarita Village Specific Plan. Because of a timing issue for Lennar, Mr.
Fagan requested that the proposal be approved by way of a resolution versus an ordinance.
Mr. Grant Fluegge, representing Lennar Homes, readdressed the request as noted by Mr.
Fagan.
Mr. Robert Patterson, representing Lennar Homes, reiterated previously made comments by Mr.
Fagan and requested approval of the request by way of a resolution.
Mr. John Lynn, 32237 Placer Belair, relayed his opposition to the proposed increase in home
sizes, noting that the Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association has no other homes of that
large size.
There being no additional input, Mayor Stone closed the public hearing.
Because the City Council will be changing the zoning for the area of discussion, City Attorney
Thorson recommended that the request be approved by way of an ordinance versus a
resolution.
For Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill stated that he was of the opinion that
the larger-sized homes would not create any negative concerns/impact to the community.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception
of Councilman Pratt who abstained.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
16 Pala Road Interim Improvements and Widening - Project No. PW99-11 (Interim), includin,q
traffic si,qnal at Pala/Loma Linda (PW98-14) and a traffic si.qnal at Pala/Wolf Valley
(PW98-15)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Review the Project Plans and Specifications for the construction of Pala Road
Interim Improvement - Project No. PW99-11 (Interim) including road widening, a
traffic signal at Pala/Loma Linda (PW98-14) and a traffic signal at PalaNVolf Valley
(PW98-15);
16.2 Continue the matter to November 14, 2000, and direct staff to prepare a response to
the comments of residents and interested parties to the proposed project for the
November 14, 2000, meeting.
Mr. Peter Lucier, 31257 Hiawatha Court, representing Wolf Valley Homeowners Association,
noted that, in his opinion, the proposed widening of Pala Road would accommodate the
additionally anticipated traffic to the Pechanga Casino; that the proposed project does not
address sound mitigation for Pala Road, advising that the sound decibel level for Pala Road
currently exceeds the California State Law standards as per the draft EIR for Wolf Creek
Specific Plan; that the current Pala Road noise level impact the residents' living environment as
it relates to internally as well as externally as it relates to backyard usage; and that the
congestion issue of concern pertains to Loma Linda/Pala Road. Mr. Lucier briefly referenced
R:\Minutes\101000
21
his-letter of concern with regard to this project, noting that copies were faxed to the City
Councilmembers, Public Works Director Hughes, City Manager Nelson, and Mayor Stone. In
closing, Mr. Lucier advised that he would further address the issue at the November 14, 2000,
City Council meeting.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to continue the matter to the November 14, 2000, City
Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Nelson apprised the public of the Fourth Quarterly Workshop for the Riverside
County Integrated plan on Tuesday, October 17, 2000, at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions from Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT
At 1:16 A.M. on October 11, 2000, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned for the
purpose of a quarterly Riverside County Integrated Plan Workshop, to Tuesday, October 17,
2000, at 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:~vlinutes\101000
22
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the fo[lowing claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $1,094,514.51
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of November, 2000.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 2000-
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITYOF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 2000- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 28th day of November, 2000 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos2000-
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
11/09/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/16/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/28/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
11/09/00 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 11/28/00 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
165
190
192
193
194
210
280
3OO
32O
33O
34O
39O
GENERAL FUND
RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL S
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
TCSD DEBT SERVICE
$ 428,511.66
16,941.58
132,701.42
29,122.26
27,865.53
451.09
171,832.11
28,833.79
5,369.53
16,006.05
5,04O.66
9,091.70
5,465.00
$ 265,774.22
246,755.85
364,705.31
217,279.13
$ 1,094,514.51
$ 877,235.38
001 GENERAL
165 R DA-LOW/MO D
190 TCSD
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 RDA-ClP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
SHAWN~ELSON, CITY MANAGER
158,908.66
3,826.36
36,834.12
55.21
2,530.84
494.08
1,948.05
735.95
6,237.91
1,905.89
3,802.06
217,279.13
$ 1,094,514.51
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUDHRE2 CITY OF TEMEDULA PAGE 15
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~/MO0 SET ASIDE
190 COHMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY *
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
134,218.39
7,955.15
61,602.75
29,110.60
3,937.83
352.05
4,988.78
8,357.55
7,705.67
1,451.98
5,842.20
TOTAL 265,774.22
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CNECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE HUMBER NAME
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
65672 11/03/00
65673 11/03/00
65675 11/08/00
GLEN IVY SPRINGS SPA
MOUNT PALOMAR WINERY
004087 LOWE'S
SISTER CITIES-VISITOR RECEIV. 001-2174
SISTER CITIES-VISITOR RECEIV. 001-2174
ROL.TREE DECORATIONS-DUCK POND 190-183-999-5370
168.00
59.50
150.72
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 25,254.10
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 564.15
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 4,991.02
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 14.30
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 399.87
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IES) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 118.99
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 271.43
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 70.67
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 1,057.22
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 228.55
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 499.54
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 6,131.88
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 151.84
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,337.08
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 2.34
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 93.88
936750 11/09/00 000283 INGTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 20.45
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 70.42
'936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 28.15
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 262.56
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 65.40
936750 11/09/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 137.80
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 107.80
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD! 165-2070 3.90
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 77.20
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 193-2070 3.05
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 280-2070 .87
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 320-2070 3.92
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 4.87
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 .96
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 6,910.86
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 147.49
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 1,133.20
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 4.23
936807 11/09/00 000444 IRSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 86.93
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 34.11
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 65.92
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 14.73
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 226.72
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 53.60
936807 11/09/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 100.97
65678 11/09/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 001-2330 282.30
65678 11/09/00 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330 175.00
168.00
59.50
150.72
41,771.64
8,981.33
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCRER/CNECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65678 11/09/00
65678 11/09/00
65678 11/09/00
65678 11/09/00
65678 11/09/00
65678 11/09/00
65678 11/09/00
65678 11/09/00
65679 11/09/00
65680 11/09/00
65680 11/09/00
65680 11/09/00
65680 11/09/00
65680 11/09/00
65680 11/09/00
65680 11/09/00
65681 11/09/00
65681 11/09/00
65682 11/09/00
65683 11/09/00
65684 11/09/00
65685 11/09/00
65686 11/09/00
65686 11/09/00
65686 11/09/00
65686 11/09/00
65686 11/09/00
65686 11/09/00
65687 11/09/00
65688 11/09/00
65689 11/09/00
65690 11/09/00
65690 11/09/00
65691 11/09/00
65692 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
VENDOR
NUMBER
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
003552
VENDOR
NAME
A LAC
A LAC
A LAC
A LAC
A LAC
A LAD
A LAC
A LAC
004148 A T & T
000116 A V P VISION PLANS
000116 A V P VISION PLANS
000116 A V P VISION PLANS
000116 A V P VISION PLANS
000116 A V P VISION PLANS
000116 A V P VISION PLANS
000116 A V P VISION PLANS
003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC
003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC
004267
000110
ADAMS, SHEILA
ALL VALLEY GLASS
AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE
AMEZCUA, OCTAVIO
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
003266 ARCUS DATA SECURITY
0026/*8 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
003466 BASKET & BALLOONS TOO!
0034~ BASKET & BALLOONS TOO!
003126 BOOMGAARDEN, DENNIS
BRIDGHAM, KARIN
003553 C I G N A
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
003552 EXP PROT
003552 EXP PROT
003552 NOSP IC
003552 STD
003552 STD
003552 STD
003552 STD
003552 STD
OCT LONG DISTANCE SVCS:P.D.STN
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
OLD TOWN TEMECULA BILLBOARD
OLD TWN BILLBOARD:SUMMER NGHTS
REFUND: SPORTS-MINI-HAWKS
RES IMPR PROM: ~HLOR,TIMOTHY
POSTAGE METER SUPPLIES
REFUND: SPORTS-MINI-HAWKS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/21 ROSA
TEMP HELP W/E 10/21BRUNER
TEMP HELP W/E 10/21WESTHAVER
TEMP HELP W/E 9/30 REID
TEMP HELP W/E 10/21 HITCHCOCK
TEMP HELP W/E 10/21 SIMPKINS
OFFSITE RECORDS STORAGE
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:RICK SERVEN
INSTALL CRC HVAC CNTRLS W/TIME
CITY PROMOTIONAL BASKETS
SALES TAX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REFUND: SPORTS-MINI-HAWKS
003553 LTD
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-2330
320-2330
001-2330
001-2330
190-2330
193-2330
194-2330
340-2330
001-170-999-5208
001-2310
165-2310
190-2310
194-2510
280-2310
330-2310
340-2310
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5362
190-183-4982
165-199-813-5804
330-199-999-5220
190-183-4982
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-120-999-5277
190-180-999-5214
190-182-999-5212
001-111-999-5270
001-111-999-5270
190-183-999-5330
190-183-4982
001-2580
ITEM
AMOUNT
55.80
27.90
17.50
592.00
112.00
9.60
3.20
9.60
~6.78
626.36
13.94
63.42
1.68
4.64
5.58
24.15
1,751.00
400.00
22.00
325.00
52.66
17.00
214.08
202.56
468.00
62.40
476.78
468.00
825.50
43.00
1,275.00
180.00
13.95
280.80
22.00
1,510.19
CHECK
AMOUNT
?39.77
2,151.00
22.00
325.00
52.66
17.00
1,891.82
825.50
43.00
1,275.00
193.95
280.80
22.00
VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CNECK CHECK
NUNBER OATE
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65695 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65693 11/09/00
65695 11/09/00
65695 11/09/00
65696 11/09/00
65697 11/09/00
65698 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65699 11/09/00
65700 11/09/00
65701 11/09/00
65702 11/09/00
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
003553
OO3553
003553
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
C GNA
004311 CAL CUSTOM DESIGN
004311 CAL CUSTOM DESIGN
001159 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE
CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN HIG
004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
003553 LTD 165-2380 37.58
003553 LTD 190-2380 269.70
003553 LTD 192-2380 .61
003553 LTD 193-2380 20.91
003553 LTD 194-2380 5.59
003553 LTD 280-2380 16.65
003553 LTD 300-2380 7.33
003553 LTD 320-2380 65.64
003553 LTD 330-2380 12.08
003553 LTD 340-2380 34.83
003553 STD 001-2500 2,107.92
003553 STD 165-2500 52.46
003553 STD 190-2500 376.44
003553 STD 192-2500 .86
003553 STD 193-2500 29.20
003553 STD 194-2500 7.80
003553 STD 280-2500 23.24
003553 STD 300-2500 10.23
003553 STD 320-2500 91.61
003553 STD 330-2500 16.85
003553 STD 340-2500 48.62
DRAWING BOARDS:FIRE PLN CK USE 001-171-999-5220
SALES TAX 001-171-999-5220
PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS 001-150-999-5250
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
RECREATION SUPPLIES-TOD
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS
000387 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS M
CASEBOLT, ROSE
CASTILLA, NANCY
190-184-999-5301
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
ADMIN ASSIST MGMT SKILLS:Il/30 001-171-999-5261
REFUND:SPORTS-SKYHAWKS SOCCER 190-183-4982
REFUND: SKYHAWKS FLAG FOOTBALL 190-183-4982
50.00
3.88
966.00
100.00
25.70
632.13
13.01
128.71
.33
10.73
2.59
6.49
3.24
26.00
9.75
18.52
129.00
22.00
20.00
4,746.34
53.88
966.00
100.00
25.70
851.50
129.00
22.00
20.00
65703 11/09/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRSHMNTS:HR MTG W/DIRECTOR 001-110-999-5260 13.95
65703 11/09/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRSBMNTS:LENNAR/HARVESTON MT 001-110-999-5260 94.80
VOUCHRE2
11/09/00 10:25
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65703 11/09/00
65703 11/09/00
65703 11/09/00
65704 11/09/00
65704 11/09/00
65705 11/09/00
65706 11/09/00
65707 11/09/00
65708 11/09/00
65709 11/09/00 002945
65709 11/09/00 002945
65709 11/09/00 002945
65710 11/09/00
65710 11/09/00
65711 11/09/00
65712 11/09/00
65713 11/09/00 004254
65713 11/09/00 004254
65714 11/09/00 002954
65715 11/09/00 000684
65716 11/09/00 004192
65716 11/09/00 004192
65716 11/09/00 004192
65716 11/09/00 004192
65716 11/09/00 004192
65716 11/09/00 004192
65717 11/09/00 004320
65718 11/09/00 001380
65719 11/09/00 001165
65720 11/09/00 002939
65721 11/09/00
65722 11/09/00 001056
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
002534 CATERERS CAFE
002534 CATERERS CAFE
002534 CATERERS CAFE
003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID
003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID
001326 CNULA VISTA, CITY OF
CICCHINELL1, MAUREEN
COLMER, JANICE
002571 CORCHOLA, BARBARA
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFSHMNTS:SR PLN ASSESS PANEL
REFRSHMNTS:SR PLN ASSESS PANEL
REFRSHMNTS:LENNAR/HARVESTON MT
SAFE DRIVER AWARD JACKET
SALES TAX
CCPA TRAINING CONSORTIUM FEES
REFUND: SPORTS-MINI-HAWKS
REFUND: SPORTS-MINI-HAWKS
DJ SVCS:SR CTR ANNIVERSARY
SKATE PARK COOPER LENS LNBC
FREIGHT
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL SALES TAX
004003 CRISP, ALBERT K.
004003 CRISP, ALBERT K.
DEBOE, DANA
DELGADO, PEDRO
DEVILLES, THE
DEVILLES, THE
DIAMOND GARAGE
DIEHL EVANS & COMPANY
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
OCT PREMIUM FOR WORKERS COMP
OCT PUBLIC ~ORKS CONSULTANT
REFUND: SPORTS-MINI-HAWKS
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NIGHTS
ENTERTAINMENT:SUMMER NIGHTS
RES IMPR PRGM: FARMER,ROBERT
GOV'T TAX SEM:12/13:BRWN/JRGSN
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
DOWNTOWN PROMOTION REPO ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
E S ] EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 10/20 THURSTON
ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATI TEEN FUND RAISER:ENTERTAIN BKS
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R INSTALL PROPERTY INFO MODULES
ER1CKSON, JANET REFUND: COOKING-SHARPEN KNIVES
EXCEL LANDSCAPE AUG LDSUP SVCS: MEDIANS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-999-5260
D01-150-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-150-999~5248
190-185-4982
190-183-4982
190-181-999-5301
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-1182
001-163-999-5248
190-183-4982
190-2900
280-199-999-5362
280-199-999-5562
165-199-813-5804
001-140-999-5258
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-161-999-5263
001-164-601-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-163-999-5263
280-199-999-5228
190-186-999-5118
190-183-4980
001-161-610-5250
190-183-4982
190-180-999-5415
ITEM
AMOUNT
167.19
64.65
54.03
130.00
10.08
5~.00
22.00
22.00
100.00
50.00
7.50
4.46
2.34-
800.00
22,00
100.00
250.00
500.00
720.00
200.00
187.97
39.00
120.58
182.60
63.17
58.78
159.00
1,488.50
576.00
1,407.00
30.00
1,975.00
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
394.62
140.08
575,00
22.00
22.00
100.00
61.96
797.66
22.00
100.00
750.00
720.00
200.00
652.10
159.00
1,488.50
576.00
1,407.00
30.00
VODCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
HUMBER DATE
65722 11/09/00
65722 11/09/00
65722 11/09/00
65722 11/09/00
65722 11/09/00
65723 11/09/00
65723 11/09/00
65724 11/09/00
65725 11/09/00
65725 11/09/00
65725 11/09/00
65725 11/09/00
65725 11/09/00
65725 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65726 11/09/00
65727 11/09/00
65728 11/09/00
65729 11/09/00
65730 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER HAME
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
000478 FAST SIGHS
000478 FAST SIGNS
004310 FEDEX GROUND INC
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST RANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST RANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST 8ANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
001093 FRAZEE PAINT
000173 GENERAL BINDING CORPORA
004146 GILLILAND, ROBIN
00017-/ GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
00017-/ GLENN[ES OFF[CE PRODUCT
00017-/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
00017-/ GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENN[ES OFF[CE PROUUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFF[CE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENN[ES OFF[CE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
00017-/ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
SEP LDSCP REPAIRS: SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5212
SEP LDSCP REPAIRS: SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-521Z
SEP LDSCP REPAIRS:SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5212
SEP LDSCP REPAIRS: SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5212
SEP/OCT LDSCP SVCS:CBILD MUSEU 190-180-999-5415
CHANGE DATE ON TCSD BANNER
MUSEUM DISPLAY LETTERS
GROUND EXPRESS PACKAGE SERVICE
190-180-999-5301
190-185-999-5301
001-111-999-5230
LOT BOOK REPT:42338 AGENA ST.
LOT ROOK REPT:30219 CUPENO LN
LOT BOOK REPT:30261PECHANGA D
LOT BOOK REPT:39790 KNOLLRIDGE
LOT BOOK REPT: JONES
LOT BOOK REPT: STEVENS
165-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5250
XX-7824 COMERCHERO:RAIL CONF 001-100-999-5258
XX-92~7 R.ROBERTR:CONF/RUPPLIE 001-100-999-5220
XX-9277 R.ROBERTR:CONF/SUPPLIE 001-1270
XX-9277 H.RORERFS:ODNF/SUPPLIE 001-100-999-5258
XX~2292 G.RODERTS:MTG/SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5260
XX-2292 G.ROBERTS:MTG/SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220
XX-6165 YATES:PROF MTG IN T~H 001-150-999-5260
XX-0515 THORNHILL:PUBL/PROF MT 001-161-999-5260
XX-0515 THORNHILL:PUBL/PROF MT 001-161-999-5228
XX-0432 A.ELMO:LUNCH MTG 001-162-999-5260
XX-1143 PARKER:NRPA CONF 190-180-999-5258
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
001-150-999-5250
REISSUE CK:REPAIR PW SPRAYER 001-164-601-5215
BINDER SUPPLIES: COPY CENTER 330-199-999-5220
REIMB:SUPPLIER FOR SISTER CITY 001-101-999-5280
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR 001-110-999-5220
MIRC OFFICE RUPPLIER-CITY MGR 001-110-999-5220
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY CLRK 001-120-999-5220
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-COPY CTR
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCSD
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-CRC
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCC
330-199-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999~5220
190-185-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
190-184-999-5301
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5220
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES'FIRE DEPT 001'171-999'5220
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-RDA-LOt4/M 165-199-999-5220
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-RDA-LOW/M 280-199-999~5220
276.95
269.06
132.58
117.93
273.91
16.16
57.85
36.13
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
150.OO
150.00
1,100.55
43.09
509.71
65.75
19.41
135.72
42.00
29.92
19.76
17.79
380.61
155.00
197.53
59.73
165.00
126.80
435.54
128.33
32.82
191.40
86.46
58.66
267.50
6.76
107.91
389.35
82.63
82.62
3,045.43
74.01
36.13
900.00
2,364.31
155.00
197.53
59.73
165.00
VOUCHRE2
11/09/00 10:25
CITY OF TEMEEULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
VOUCHER/
CNEEK CNECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65731 11/09/00
65732 11/09/00
65?33 11/09/00
65734 11/09/00
65735 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
65736 11/09/00
VENDOR
NAME
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
0001~7 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
003676 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION-ES
003640 GRAYNER ENGINEERING
GREENSTEIN, BEVERLY
HADAEGH, ALICIA
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
0001~ HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
000186 HANKS HARDWARE
65737 11/09/00 002372
657"58 11/09/00
65738 11/09/00
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65739 11/09/00 002107
65740 11/09/00
65740 11/09/00
65741 11/09/00
65741 11/09/00
65741 11/09/00
65741 11/09/00
65741 11/09/00
65741 11/09/00
HARMON, JUDY
HARRINGTON, MICHAEL A
HARRINGTOM, MICHAEL A
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-INF SYS
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-EEC MGMT
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES-EEO DEVEL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5221
001-120-999-5277
001-111-999-5220
REL RETENTION TO ESCROW:PALA 210-1035
OCT DESIGN SVC:MERCANTILE BLDG
REFUND:EXERCISE-KUNDALIN! YOGA
REFUND: MUSIC-LITTLE MOZARTS
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW ST MNTC
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-ERE
HARDWARE SUPPLIES - B&S DEPT
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TEE
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW INSPECTIO
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
210-190-167-5802
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
001-164-602-5242
340-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-162-999-5242
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
001-165-999-5242
190-185-999-5212
190-183-999-5330
REFUND: LD98-135GR DEPOSIT 001-2670
REFD:LD98-135GR PM 19553 DEPST 001-2670
ITEM
AMOUNT
500.68
48.63
34.53
20.00
236.25
40.00
48.00
66.08
102.40
75.67
35.08
781.99
602.36
14.86
6.08
117.48
370.80
10,000.00
995.00
HIGHHARK INE 002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510 201.05
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 180.55
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.87
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.22
NIGNMARK INE 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 .80
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.87
HIGHMARK IND 002107 VL REVER 001-2510 208.05-
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510 187.55
HIGNMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510 11.87
HIGHMARK INE 002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510 2.22
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510 .74
HIGH~RK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 300-2510 .80
HIGHMARK INC 002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510 4.87
SALES TAX CONSULTING SERVICES
SALES TAX RECOVERY FEES
001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS &
001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS &
001-140-999-5248
001-140-999-5248
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
000194 ! C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMp
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP
900.00
2,730.26
2,454.65
378.34
485.44
30.00
16.04
149.99
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,580.62
20.00
236.25
40.00
48.00
1,802.00
370.80
10,995.00
402.10
3,630.26
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
65741 11/09/00 000194
65742 11/09/00 IMAGE WATCHES
65742 11/09/00 IMAGE WATCHES
65743 11/09/00 INLAND VALLEY BABE RUTH
65744 11/09/00 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
65745 11/09/00 001186 IRWIN, JOHN
65746 11/09/00 003832 J T K CONSTRUCTION
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTION
I C M A RETIREMENT TAUS 000194 DEF COMP
46 CITY LOGO WATCHES
46 CITY LOGO WATCHES
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
P~L SANITIZING CHEMICALS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
GIS MODIFICATIONS
65747 11/09/00 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS NETWORK SUPPORT SERVICES
65748 11/09/00 004079 JENKENS& GILCHRIST SEPT PROF LEGAL SVCS
65749 11/09/00
652'50
65751
65752
65753
65754
65755
11/09/00
11/09/00
11/09/00 001667
11/09/00 000206 KINKOS INC
11/09/00 003631 KLEINFELDER INC
11/09/00 KLEPPER, MIKJ~LEEN
65756 11/09/00 LAMBERT, DAWN
65757 11/09/00 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
65758 11/09/00 LEDESMA, MAX
65761 11/09/00 MAIETTA, HELEN
65762 11/09/00 004141 MAINTEX
65763 11/09/00 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN
65763 11/09/00 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN
65764 11/09/00 MANSILLA, MEAL
65765 11/09/00 003243 MANSUR SERVICES INC
JOAN F SPARKMAN ELEM SC REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
JONNSTON, ALYCE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
300-2080
001-1170
001-111-999-5270
190-2900
190-186-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
340-199-701-5610
320-199-999-5250
001-130-999-5247
190-2900
REFUND: SPORTS-SKYHAWKS SOCCER 190-183-4982
ICARMA, JACKIE REFUND: SPORTS-MINI-HAWKS
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 KELLY
STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES
AUG GEOTECH SVCS:PALA RD BRDG
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
REFUND: SWIM LESSONS
FINANCIAL MGMT SEM:12/7-8/00
REFUND: MUSIC-LITTLE MOZARTS
REFUND:EXERCISE-HATHA YOGA
HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD
REFUND: SPORTS - MINI-HAWKS
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REIMB:INSPECTORS ACADEMY:lO/13
AUDIO/VIDEO ROOM MODIFICATIONS
190-183-4982
001-140-999-5118
330-199-999-5220
210-165-631-5801
190-2900
190-186-4970
001-140-999-5258
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
190-185-999-5212
190-183-4982
190-182-999-5212
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
001-171-999-5261
320-199-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
50.00
692.58
65.96
100.00
184.90
316.00
2,695.00
1,463.52
42.00
100.00
22.00
22.00
104.00
137.11
3,417.00
100.00
55.00
350.00
48.00
43.00
10.67
22.00
18.49
224.00
658.00
121.87
1,500.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,564.46
758.54
100.00
184.90
316.00
2,695.00
1,463.52
42.00
100.00
22.00
22.00
104.00
137.11
3,417.00
100.00
55.00
350.00
48.00
43.00
10.67
22.00
18.49
882.00
121.87
1,500.00
VOUOHRE2
11/09/00 10:25
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE 8
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
65766 11/09/00
65767 11/09/00
65768 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65769 11/09/00
65770 11/09/00
65771 11/09/00
65772 11/09/00
6577'5 11/09/00
65774 11/09/00
65~75 11/09/00
65776 11/09/00
65776 11/09/00
65777 11/09/00
65778 11/09/00
65778 11/09/00
65779 11/09/00
65780 11/09/00
65781 11/09/00
65782 11/09/00
65782 11/09/00
65782 11/09/00
65782 11/09/00
65782 11/09/00
65782 11/09/00
65782 11/09/00
MASCARINA-VO, JUDITH
002693 MATROS, ANDREA
000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC
REFUND:GYMNASTICS-TERRIFIC 2~S
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
10,000 ANIMAL CONTROL FLYERS
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENT ADV
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 OENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 OENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 OENTALML
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENT REV
003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML
003163 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM
MORINt LEAH
002727 MUNICIPAL MGMT ASSISTAN
MURDAUGHt SHANNON
NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES-PMT
OASIS VENDING
OASIS VENDING
OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TCRgN TIRE & SERVICE
OMEGA LAKE SERVICES
PARADISE CHEVROLET CADI
002139
004191
002292
002292
00396~
002105
002105
002668
000472
004074
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA
ANN'L MAINT CONTRACT:EPI030
REFUND:SPORTS-SKYHAWKS SOCCER
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:G.YATES
REFUND: SPORTS - MINI-HAWKS
RECRUITMENT AD:VAR.POSITIONS
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:#219396
CITY HALL SUPPLIES/SERVICE
MAINT FAC SUPPLIES/SERVICE
OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
NOV DUCK POND WATER MAINT SVCS
FIRE PREVo VEHICLE REPAIRS
SR CENTER RECREATION SUPPLIES
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 SLSHIELD
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-4982
190-183-999-5330
001-172-999-5222
001-2090
001-2340
165-2340
190-2340
193-2340
194-2340
280-2340
330-2340
340-2340
001-2090
001-2340
330-199-999-5217
190-183-4982
001-150-999-5226
190-183-4982
001-150-999-5254
190-180-999-5228
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
001-161-999-5220
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5250
001-171-999-5214
190-181-999-5301
001-2090
165-2090
190-2090
280-2090
330-2090
001-2090
190-2090
ITEM
AMOUNT
27.00
768.00
654.04
24.16
3,298.84
179.41
485.32
16.20
4.86
89.69
16.20
71.76
24.16-
24.16
248.00
22.00
50.00
22.00
207.68
90.00
400.49
77.58
128.54
405.14
29.19
800.00
210.55
91.17
1,304.60
187.49
421.06
62.49
89.31
1,290.16
376.20
CHECK
AMOUNT
27.00
768.00
654.04
4,186.44
248.00
22.00
50.00
22.00
207.68
90.00
478.07
128.54
434.33
800.00
210.55
91.17
VOUCHRE2
11/09/00 10:25
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PERS
65782 11/09/00 000245 PEAS
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
HEALTH INBUR. PRE
HEALTH INSUR. PRE
HEALTH INSUR. PRE
HEALTH IHSUR. PRE
HEALTH INSUR. PRE
HEALTH INSUR. PRE
HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH IMBUE. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH IHSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INBUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
(HEALTH INSUR. PRE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000245 CIGNA
000245 HELTHHET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHHET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTflNET
000245 KAISER
000245 MAXICARE
000245 PACCARE
000245 PACCARE
000245 PACCARE
000245 PC
000245 PEAS CHO
000245 PEAS DED
000245 PEAS-ADH
000245 UNI
000245 AETNA
000245 AETNA
000245 AETNA
000245 AETNA
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 CIGNA
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHRET
000245 KAISER
000245 PACCARE
000245 PACCARE
000245 PACCARE
000245 PEAS CHO
000245 PEAS REV
000245 UNI
65783 11/09/00 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
65784 11/09/00 000249 PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
194-2090
280-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
165-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2122
001-161-999-5222
001-161-999-5242
001-161-610-5260
001-111-999-5220
194-180-999-5254
001-150-999-5260
001-140-999-5261
001-110-999-5260
190-183-999-5320
001-2175
190-180-999-5260
190~183-999-5370
001-101-999-5280
001-150-999-5265
ITEM
AMOUNT
403.33
4,892.53
1,388.94
90.32
27.10
.55
665.29
1,884.05
166.00
3,911.92
745.54
119.19
608.00
3,671.13
2,463.32
104.37
1,889.60
356.7~
160.86
43.40
53.62
62.39
103.67
113.80
468.03
103.18
59.20
66.99
292.45
200.33
16.92
271.87
2,437.49-
84.05
154.60
4.21
27.91
42.43
26.93
44.97
19.03
8.32
29.72
12.00
24.46
33.09
17.22
19.22
25.28
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
26,762.49
154.60
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CNECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 1t/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65784 11/09/00
65786 11/09/00
65786 11/09/00
65786 11/09/00
65786 11/09/00
65787 11/09/00
6578? 11/09/00
65788 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65709 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65789 11/09/00
65790 11/09/00
65791 11/09/00
65792 11/09/00
65793 11/09/00
65795 11/09/00
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASR
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE C~PAN
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
002776 PRIME MATRIX INC
002776 PRIME MATRIX INC
004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER OIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIBT
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER OIST
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATEN DIBT
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
003742
002907
000353
000353
RANCHO ELEMENTARY SCHO0
REHAB FINANCIAL CORPORA
REINHART FONTEB ASSOCIA
RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR
RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASN REIMBURSEMENT
001-101-999-5280
190-183-999-5570
001-164-604-5260
001-111-999-5270
190-180-999-5260
210-190-170-5802
190-180-999-5263
001-2170
001-150-999-5260
001-164-604-5260
001-165-999-5258
210-190-173-5802
190-185-999-5301
190-185-999-5501
190-183-9(29-5370
001-111-999-5220
210-1990
DISPLAY AD:VAR.CIP CONSTR.UPDT 001-165-999-5256
DISPL.ADS:COMMISSION POSITIONS 001-120-999-5254
DISPLAY ADS:HOT SUMMER NIGHTS 280-199~999-5562
DISPLAY AD:TRAILS ~L~STER PLAN 190-180-999-5254
SEP CELLULAR SVCS:SR VAN 190-180-999-5208
CREDIT:PREVIOUS PAYMENT MADE 190-180-999-5208
SEP PROF.SVCS:NW SPORTS COMPLX 210-190-173-5802
OCT 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL ST
OCT 01-02-98000-0 STN 84
OCT 01-02-98010-0 STN 84
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
280-199-807-5801
001-171-999-5240
001-171-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
190-184~999-5240
190-1~-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
340-199-701-5240
190-185-999-5240
001-164-603-5240
001-165-999-5250
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
RES IMPRV PRGM LOAN SERVICES 165-199-815-5804
6TH ST. PROPERTY APPRAISAL 280-199-999-5250
SEP PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT 001-2260
SEP PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT 001-2265
ITEM
AMOUNT
14.55
25.59
39.92
48.49
8.97
20.40
31.34
10.00
14.00
3.75
14.00
49.50
4.95
15.99
19.53
5.90
12.99
1,014.30
201,00
600.00
201.00
50.14
31.47-
1,232.64
44.26
9,62
270.10
5,615.62
128.69
558.04
217.48
135.17
2,809.92
394.90
55.46
322.78
314.04
100.00
1,050.00
5,500.00
1,442.00
495.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
674.66
2,016.50
18.67
1,232.64
10,874.08
100.00
1,050.00
3,500.00
1,937.00
VOUCHRE2
11/09/00 ~0:25
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
65794 11/09/00 000418
65795 11/09/00 001365
65295 11/09/00 001365
65795 11/09/00 001365
65795 11/09/00 001365
65796 11/09/00 000268
65797 11/09/00 000955
65798 11/09/00 004278
65799 11/09/00
65800 11/09/00
65801 11/09/00
65802 11/09/00
65803 11/09/00
65804 11/09/00
65805 11/09/00
65805 11/09/00
65805 11/09/00
65806 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65807 11/09/00
65808 11/09/00
65809 11/09/00
000278
003734
003500
000~51
000(~5
000645
000645
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE
RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN
RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN
RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN
RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN
RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
AUG-SEP NTC COMPLETION COPIES
RENEW ANNtL PRMT:N/S SNACK BAR
RENEW ANNUL PRNT:R.V.SNACK BAR
RENEW ANNUL RRMT:PALOMA PARK
RENEW ANNUAL HAZMAT PERMiT-CRC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-165-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
OCT 2000 K-RAT PAYMENT 001-2300
BAR ACTION RESPONSE - 9/09/00
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF 004278 GARNISH
RYLAND HOMES
SALAZAR, MARIANNE
SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
SHERWO00, ALAN K.
SIMON & SIMON CONSTRUCT
SKILLPATH
SMART & FINAL INC
SMART & FINAL INC
SMART & FINAL INC
SMITH, ZENAIDA B.
001-170-999-5288
001-2140
REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD99-O31MP 001-2670
REIMB:SCACEO CERT PRGM:10/27
RECRUITMENT AD:SR LDSCP INSP.
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
RES IMPRV PRGM: FARMER
LEADRSHP CF:MN-12/13:JM-12/15
MISC SUPPLIES FOR MUSEUM
SR CENTER RECREATION SUPPLIES
TCC RECREATION SUPPLIES
001-161-999-5261
001-150-999-5254
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO DALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHL
SO. CAL BASEBALL USSSA
190-183-999-5330
165-199-813-5804
001-171-999-5261
190-185-999-5301
190-181-999-5301
190-184-999-5301
REFUND:OVRPMT - COMPUTER LOAN 001-1175
NOV 2-17-214-0428 MEADOWS PKWY
NOV 2-06-105-0654 VARIOUS MTRS
NOV 2-10-331-1353 STN #84
NOV 2-18-363-1902 PAUBA RD
OCT 2-10-331-2153 TCC
OCT 2-19-338-2262 VARIOUS MTRS
NOV 2-20-798-3248 VARiOUS MTRS
OCT 2-19-~3-3255 FRONT ST PED
NOV 2-02-351-5281 CRC
NOV 2-02-351-5281 CRC
OCT 2-15-671-5518 PALA RD
NOV 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS MTRS
NOV 2-01-202-7603 ARTERIAL BTL
NOV 2-10-901-7962 YUKON
OCT 2-20-966-8714 SANTIAGO RD
SCMAF INSTITUTE:TCSD:lO/12/O0
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
001-171-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
190-184-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
001-164-603-5319
190-182-999-5240
190-186-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5261
190-2900
ITEM
AMOUNT
7.00
65.00
65.00
65.00
418.00
1,315.00
1,020.00
212.70
130.00
54.69
578.23
72.00
2,545.00
398.00
59.24
115.36
78.36
11.34
174.28
2,179.37
697.76
81.52
716.87
56.80
67~.84
399.38
3,190.97
97-5.44
144.46
29,070.30
10,795.14
159.72
24.01
320.00
100.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
7.00
613.00
1,315.00
1,020.00
212.70
130.00
54.69
578.23
72.00
2,545.00
398.00
252.96
11.34
49,341.86
320.00
100.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 12
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65810 11/09/00
65810 11/09/00
65810 11/09/00
65811 11/09/00
65812 11/09/00
65812 11/09/00
65813 11/09/00
65813 11/09/00
65813 11/09/00
65813 11/09/00
65813 11/09/00
65814 11/09/00
65814 11/09/00
65814 11/09/00
65814 11/09/00
65814 11/09/00
65814 11/09/00
65814 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65815 11/09/00
65816 11/09/00
65817 11/09/00
65818 11/09/00
65818 11/09/00
65819 11/09/00
65819 11/09/00
65819 11/09/00
65820 11/09/00
65820 11/09/00
65820 11/09/00
65820 11/09/00
65821 11/09/00
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
002651 SUN BADGE COMPANy
002651 SUN BADGE COMPANY
002651 SUN BADGE COMPANY
SUNRIDGE COMMUNITY CHUR
000574 SUPERTONER
000574 SUPERTONER
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
BADGES/WALLETS-CODE ENFORCEMNT 001-161-999-5242
CODE ENFORCEMENT BADGES 001-161-999-5242
CODE ENFORCEMENT WALLETS 001-161-999-5242
REFUND:OVRPMT-PICNIC SHELTER 190-2900
MISC PRINTER SUPPLIES
MISC PRINTER SUPPLIES
MISC REC SUPPLIES * TCSD
MISC REC SUPPLIES - TCSD
REC SUPPLIES FOR HIGH HOPES
MISC REC SUPPLIES - TCSD
MISC REC SUPPLIES - TCSD
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5320
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
173.06
127.00
34.50
10.00
59.26
181.02
356.64
51.80
99.85
12.84
59.69
001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 472.50
001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 74.25
001547 TEAMSTERS LOGAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.75
001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.25
001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 22.50
001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 22.50
001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 6.75
000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
0006/*2 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
0006/*2 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE
000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
TEMECULA LITTLE LEAGUE
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-I020
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020
EMPLOYEE CONTRISUTION TO FLEX 330-1020
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020
4,811.05
225.00
1,239.00
41.25
13.75
197.25
75.00
477.35
111.25
SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 100.16
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
MISC MAINT. SUPPLIES - TCSD
MISC MAINT. SUPPLIES - TCSD
190-180-999-5212
340-199-702-5212
190-180-999-5212
VAR. PARKS LOCKSMITH SVCS
MAINT FAC LOCKSMITH SVCS
VAR. PARKS LOCKSMITH SVCS
AUG VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
AUG VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
AUG VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
AUG VEHICLE FUEL USAGE
001-163-99~-5263
001-164-604-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-164-601-5263
001-150-999-5265
000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED
003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY
EMP. RECOGNITION AWARDS
100.00
202.47
240.59
40.26
51.47
91.16
306.74
47.60
215.60
4.17
89.50
334.56
10.00
240.28
580.82
607.50
7,190.90
100.16
100.00
443.06
182.89
574.11
89.50
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE 13
11/09/00 10:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65822 11/09/00
65823 11/09/00
65823 11/09/00
65823 11/09/00
VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
TOP GUN FLAG FOOTBALL L REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES - B&S DEPT
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIP
001-162-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
100.00
236.79
111.03
41.71
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 001-2360 145.88
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 165-2360 3.01
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 190-2360 29.71
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 192-2360 .08
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 193-2360 2.48
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSM4ERICA 003560 AD&D 194-2360 .59
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 280-2360 1.49
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AO&O 300-2360 .74
65024 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 320-2360 6.00
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D 330-2360 2.25
65824 11/09/00 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&{) 340-2360 4.27
65825 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
65826 11/09/00
004001 U C REGENTS
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:I.E.REVIEW 001-111-999-5228
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP
100.00
000389 U S C M WEST COBRA)
000389 U S C M WEST COBRA)
000389 U S C M WEST COBRA)
000389 U S C M WEST COBRA)
000389 U B C M WEST COBRA)
000389 U S C M WEST COBRA)
000389 U B C M WEST COBRA)
000389 U S C M WEST COBRA)
001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 9,874.33
001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 101.16
001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,836.83
001065 DEF COMP 192-2080 3.75
001065 DEF COMP 193-2080 91.66
001065 OEF COMP 194-2080 18.75
001065 DEF COMP 280-2080 115.02
001065 DEF COMP 300-2080 83.33
001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 1,333.32
001065 DEF COMP 340-2080 190.01
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE=CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS
000389 PT RETIR 001-2160 2,496.98
000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 101.88
000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 886.95
000389 PT RETIR 193-2160 32.74
000389 PT RETIR 280-2160 29.34
000389 PT RETIR 320-2160 42.00
000389 PT RETIR 330-2160 52.18
000389 PT RETIR 340-2160 10.39
001-100-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
280-199-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-164-604-5230
320-199-999-5230
65827 11/09/00
65827 11/09/00
65827 11/09/00
65827 11/09/00
65827 11/09/00
65827 11/09/00
65827 11/09/00
65827 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
65828 11/09/00
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER OEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
1.65
41.70
70.44
32.01
416.49
29.92
236.54
51.60
381.55
248.42
42.35
100.00
389.53
196.50
100.00
13,648.16
3,652.46
VOUCBRE2
11/09/00 10:25
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VO~JCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
65828 11/09/00 002702 U S POSTAL SERVIEE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
65828 11/09/00 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE:CMRS POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-999-5230
001-111-999-5230
ITEM
AMOUNT
7.15
101.34
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 285.02
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 11.00
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 32.43
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .05
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 1.90
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .35
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 3.90
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 300-2120 1.25
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 9.00
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 4.00
65829 11/09/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 .60
65830 11/09/00 004261 VERIZOM CALIFORNIA
65830 11/09/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
65830 11/09/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
65830 11/09/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
65830 11/09/00 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
65830 11/09/00 004261 VERIZOM CALIFORNIA
65831 11/09/00 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
65832 11/09/00 VEST, MANJU
65833 11/09/00 WASHINGTON, CHUCK
65834 11/09/00 WEBSTER, EDWINA
65834 11/09/00 WEBSTER, EDWINA
65835 11/09/00 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN
65835 11/09/00 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN
65836 11/09/00 WINSTON TIRES
OCT XXX-1289 S. PRATT
OCT XXX-1408 P.D.SATELLITE STN
OCT XXX-2629 M. NAGGAR
OCT XXX-3539 GENERAL USAGE
OCT XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE
OCT XXX-5759 GENERAL USAGE
NOV ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE
REFUND:EXERCISE-BELLY DANCING
REFUND: K-RAT FEES
REFUND:SPORTS-SKYHAWKS SOCCER
REFUND: SPORTS - BB FUND BEG.
MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORK
MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC WORK
320-199-999-5208
001-170-999-5229
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-183-4982
001-2300
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
b~OOSIDE HOMES CALIFORN
65837 11/09/00
REFUND: DOESN'T BELONG TO CITY 001-1990
REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LDO0-O70CO 001-2670
REFUND:GYMNASTICS-EARLY TUMBLE
SEP LEASE PMT DC220 COPIER
SEP SUPPLY/MAINT DC220 COPIER
SEP INTEREST PMT DC220 COPIER
SEP SUPPLIES/~INT 5343 COPIER
SEP SUPPLIES/MAINT 5830 DOPIER
SEPT DC20 COPIER MAINT-STN 84
CREDIT: RETUNNEO SUPPLIES
OCT LEASE 5021 COPIER
190-183-4982
330-2800
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5217
001-171-999-5215
330-199-999-5220
190-184-999-5239
65838 11/09/00 WY~L~N, MONICA
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ
65839 11/09/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
61.48
309.7-5
74.88
38.17
132.02
157.90
320.00
21.25
250.00
22.00
40.00
153.14
96.23
990.28
71.30
43.00
123.92
77.57
51.48
242.77
80.31
159.00
T54.86-
67.08
PAGE 14
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,661.16
349.50
774.18
320.00
21.25
250.00
62.00
249.37
990.28
71.30
43.00
67.27
TOTAL CHECKS 265,774.22
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF FEMECULA PAGE 11
11/16/00 11:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
AMOUNT
159,331.72
8,986.43
29,880.67
11.66
1,674.70
99.04
18,817.55
2,7/0.26
5,098.26
8,300.38
3,611.68
2,708.50
5,465.00
TOTAL 246,755.85
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00 11:43
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE I
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65840 11/14/00
65841 11/14/00
65842 11/14/00
65843 11/14/00
65844 11/14/00
65845 11/14/00
65848 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65849 11/16/00
65850 11/16/00
65850 11/16/00
65851 11/16/00
65851 11/16/00
65851 11/16/00
65851 11/16/00
65851 11/16/00
65851 11/16/00
65852 11/16/00
65853 11/16/00
65854 11/16/00
65855 11/16/00
65855 11/16/00
65856 11/16/00
65857 11/16/00
65858 11/16/00
65859 11/16/00
65859 11/16/00
65859 11/16/00
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO
000152 CALIF PARKS & NECREATIO
000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO
000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO
000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIO
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
004054 ADKISON ENGINEERS INC
003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003285 AHERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV
004316 AN WIL BAG COMPANY
004316 AN WIL BAG COMPANY
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
ATTORNEY GENERAL~S REGI
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C
000475 B N I PUBLICATIONS INC
000475 B N I PUBLICATIONS INC
002085 BARNEY & BARNEY
004380 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
003138 CAL MAT
004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A
004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A
004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS APPL FEES
SINGLE BEST BROCHURE AWRD APPL
SPECIAL PRGM POSTER AWARD APPL
MARKETING THENE AWARD APPL FEE
RECREATION SER AWARD APPL FEE
TEM PUBLIC FAC FILING FEE
OCT SURVEY SVCS:IST ST BRIDGE
OCT MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CITY HALL
OCT MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MNTC FAC
OCT MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:SR CTR
OCT MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CRC
OCT MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:TCC
OCT MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MUSEUM
OCT UNIFORMS RENTAL:TESD MNTC
OCT UNIFORMS RENTAL:PW MNTC
TEMP AC PATCH FOR POT HOLE
SALES TAX
TEMP HELP W/E 10/28 REID
TEMP HELP W/E 10/28 HITCHCOCK
TEMP HELP W/E 10/28 SIMPKINS
TEMP HELP W/E 10/28 ROSA
TEMP HELP W/E 10/28 BRUNER
TEMP HELP W/E 10/28 WESTHAVER
SPT COMPLEX DESIGN COMM HATS
TEM.PUBL.FAC.FINANCING REG.FEE
MEMBERSHIP: KRISTI CUMMINGS
BKG:CONSTHUCTION SPECIFICATION
BKS:CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION
COMM PROPERTY COVERAGE:MAIN BT
2000-2001 COMM SVC FUNDING
PW PATCH TRUCK MATERIALS
CITY LIMITS GLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP
CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP
CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190'180'999-5250
390-199-999-5227
280-199-807-5804
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
190-181-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-184-999-5250
190-185-999-5250
190-180-999-5243
001-164-601-5243
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-150-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
001-162-999-5118
210-190-173-5802
390-199-999-5227
001-171-999-5214
001-163-999-5228
001-165-999-5228
300-199-999-5204
001-101-999-5267
001-164-601-5218
001-170-999-5328
001-170-999-5328
001-170-999-5328
ITEM
AMOUNT
35.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
10.00
2,486.75
98.20
41.60
51.76
112.92
58.76
46.25
70.00
98.76
310.00
24.03
218.40
468.00
450.45
214.08
265.86
468.00
252.00
25.00
43.00
147.78
147.77
396.00
3,000.00
528.98
665.00
B15.00
780.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
35.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
10.00
2,486.75
578.25
334.03
2v084.79
252.00
25.00
43.00
295.55
396.00
3,000.00
528.98
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00 11:43
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
65859 11/16/00 004248
65859 11/16/00 004248
65860 11/16/00 004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS
65861 11/16/00 000131
65862 11/16/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE
65863 11/16/00 004381
65864 11/16/00 004381
65865 11/16/00 001195
65865 11/16/00 001195
65866 11/16/00 003047
65867 11/16/00 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC
65867 11/16/00 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC
65868 11/16/00 CORNWALL ASSOCIATES
65868 11/16/00 CORNWALL ASSOCIATES
65868 11/16/00 CORNWALL ASSOCIATES
65868 11/16/00 CORNWALL ASSOCIATES
65869 11/16/00 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE
65870 11/16/00 002932
65871 11/16/00 004123
65871 11/16/00 004123
65872 11/16/00 004369 DAR MAR
65872 11/16/00 004369 DAR MAR
65873 11/16/00 000684
65874 11/16/00 002701
65875 11/16/00 004192
65875 11/16/00 004192
65875 11/16/00 004192
65875 11/16/00 004192
65875 11/16/00 004192
65875 11/16/00 004192
65876 11/16/00 001669
65B~ 11/16/00 001380
6587'/ 11/16/00 001380
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A CREDIT:BILLED TO WRONG STATION
CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/A CREDIT:BILLED TO WRONG STATION
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
CARL WARREN & COMPANY I CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES
REFSHMNTS:DOCENT TOUR
CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE
CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
CENTRAL SECURITY BERVIC
PARAMEDICS EDUCATION:Il/8-10
PARAMEDIC EDUC:BRANDT:11/8-10
ALARM MONITORING SVC: CRC
ALARM MONITORING SVC:SR CTR
CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL 2000-2001 COMM SVC FUNDING
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL EXPENSE FOE CITY VEHICLES
REFD:PRMT PA00-0333 PA000332
REFD:PRMT PA00-0333 PA000332
REFD:PRMT PA00-0333 PA000332
REFD:PRMT PA00-0333 PA000332
EE COMPUTER PURCH PRGM:SMITH,Z
CRO~N CARPET & DRAPERIE INSTALL CARPET:AUDIO/VIDEO
D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES DEC RENTAL:SATTELITE OFFICE
D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES CAM CHGS FOR SATTELITE OFFICE
OFFICIAL GIFT/NAmCAYAMA VISIT
SALES TAX
DIEHL EVANS & COHPANY HANDBOOK: 2000 REDEVELOPMENT
DIVERSIFIED RISK OCT SPECIAL EVENT PREMIUMS
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUEL]N
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL
E S ! EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 SALAZAR
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 CHU
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-999-5328
001-170-999-5328
190-183-999-5330
300-199-999-5205
190-185-999-5260
001-171-999-5261
001-171-999-5261
190-182-999-5250
190-181-~-5250
001-101-999-5267
001-110-999-5262
001-170-999-5262
001-161-4119
001-163-4119
001-171-4036
001-163-4388
001-1175
320-199-999-5250
001-170-999-5229
001-170-999-5229
001-101-999-5280
001-101-999-5280
001-140-999-5228
300-2180
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-161-999-5263
001-164-601-5263
001-165-999-5263
001-163-999-5263
001-164-601-5218
001-162-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
70.00-
70.00-
175.20
3,499.64
64.80
510.00
280.00
50.00
45.00
5,000.00
13.54
60.80
3,815.00
1,086.00
860.00
119.00
2,000.00
100.00
1,000.00
255.00
125.00
9.69
75.00
174.36
193.71
62.29
168.13
217.33
25.86
115.05
85.53
801.78
1,725.60
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,820.00
175.20
3,499.64
64.80
510.00
280.00
95.00
5,000.00
74.34
5,880.00
2,000.00
100.00
1,255.00
134.69
75.00
174,36
782,37
85.53
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
11/16/00 11:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
65877 11/16/00 001380
65877 11/16/00 001380
65877 11/16/00 001380
65877 11/16/00 001380
65877 11/16/00 001380
65877 11/16/00 001380
65877 11/16/00 001380
65877 11/16/00 001380
VENDOR
NAHE
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVlC
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
65878 11/16/00 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN
65879 11/16/00 003959 EVERETT & EVERETT PAINT
65880 11/16/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
65880 11/16/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
65880 11/16/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
65881 11/16/00 002037 EXPANETS
65881 11/16/00 002037 EXPANETS
65882 11/16/00 003633 FASTRAK DBA:LOCKHEED MA
65882 11/16/00 003633 FASTRAK DBA:LOCKHEED MA
65882 11/16/00 003633 FASTRAK DBA:LOCKHEED MA
65882 11/16/00 003633 FASTRAK DBA:LOCKHEED MA
65883 11/16/00 000165' FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
65883 11/16/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
65883 11/16/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
65883 11/16/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
65883 11/16/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
65883 11/16/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
65883 11/16/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
65884 11/16/00 002832 FENCE BUILDERS
65885 11/16/00 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK
65886 11/16/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
65886 11/16/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
65887 11/16/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
65887 11/16/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
65~7 11/16/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
65887 11/16/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
65887 11/16/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
65888 11/16/00 004379 FRIENDS OF THE TEN. LIB
65~9 11/16/00 GEOGRAPHICS
65890 11/16/00 002528 GLASS BLASTERS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 GALLARDO
TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 EBON
TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 EBON
TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 HAMSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 HANSEN
TEMP RELP W/E 11/03 NANSEN
TEMP HELP W/E 11/03 HANSEN
TEMP NELP W/E 11/03 TNURSTON
001-165-999-5118
340~199-701-5118
340-199-702-5118
001-164-604-5118
190-180-999-5118
001-161~999-5118
001-120-999-5118
190-186-999-5118
REFSHMENTS:MUSEUM ANNIVERSARY 190-185-999-5250
RES IMPR PRGM: ALVAREZ,R. 165-199-813-5804
OCT LDSCP REPAIRS:CORTE SANTOS
OCT LDSCP REPAIRS:CORTE SANTOS
OCT LDSCP REPAIRS:CORTE SAN LO
195-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
PHONE MNTC & REPAIRS:CITY HALL 320-199-999-5215
PNONE MNTC & REPAIRS:CITY HALL 320-199-999-5215
TOLL ROAD USAGE 6/01-10/26/00
TOLL ROAD USAGE 6/01-10/26/00
TOLL ROAD USAGE 6/01-10/26/00
TOLL ROAD USAGE 6/01-10/26/00
001-171-999-5214
001-162-999~5214
001-161-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
001-165-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-111-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-150-999-5230
001-111-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
RES IMPR PRGM: FIGUEROA,G
2000-2001 COMM SVC FUNDING
165-199-813-5804
001-101-999-5267
LOT BOOK REPT: VASEQUEZ
LOT BOOK REPT:RELLINS
XX-0902 O'GRADY:SISTER CITIES
XX-3083 NAGGAR:CONF & SUPPLIES
XX-3083 NAGGAR:CONF & SUPPLIES
XX-3083 NAGGAR:CONF & SUPPLIES
XX-4117 NUGHES:LEAGUE CONF
2000-2001COMM SVC FUNDING
165-199-999-5250
165-199-999-5250
001-101-999-5280
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5220
001-164-604-5258
001-101-999-5267
190-2900
001-150-999-5265
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,118.80
680.40
226.80
106.79
172.89
1,149.20
340.70
1,472.47
396.68
1,750.00
100.00
100.00
228.00
48.00
48.00
18.96
8.70
7.25
10.30
27.02
28.39
22.72
12.20
12.20
36.55
26.17
365,00
5,000.00
150.00
150.00
1,330.03
774. O0
4.29
12.04
550.80
1,000.00
100.00
34.48
CHECK
AMOUNT
7,795.43
396.68
1,750.00
428.00
96.00
45.21
165.25
365.00
5,000.00
300.00
2,671.16
1,000.00
100.00
34.48
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00 11:43
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
65891 11/16/00 004185 GPS STORE, THE
65892 11/16/00 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY
65892 11/16/00 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY
65893 11/16/00 000520 H O L COREM & CONE
65894 11/16/00 HALDERMAN, SUSAN
65895 11/16/00 HEARTSAVERS OF TEMECULA
65896 11/16/00 004317 HEMET FIRE PLACE SHOP
65896 11/16/00 004517 HEMET FIRE PLACE SHOP
65896 11/16/00 004317 HEMET FIRE PLACE SHOP
65896 11/16/00 004317 HEMET FIRE PLACE SHOP
65896 11/16/00 004517 HEMET FIRE PLACE SHOP
65896 11/16/00 004317 BEMET FIRE PLACE SHOP
65897 11/16/00 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE
65898 11/16/00 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE
65899 11/16/00 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE
65900 11/16/00 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE
65901 11/16/00 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE
65902 11/16/00 004286 HUFCOR AIRWALL
65905 11/16/00 HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL
65904 11/16/00 002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
65905 11/16/00 004265 JEWELL FENCE COMPANY
65906 11/16/00 004281 K T M K F.M.
65907 11/16/00 KAZ IoE.A., INC.
65907 11/16/00 KAZ I.E.A., INC.
65907 11/16/00 KAZ I.E.A., INC.
65907 11/16/00 KAZ I.E.A., INC.
65908 11/16/00 004292 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL
65908 11/16/00 004292 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL
65909 11/16/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC
65909 11/16/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC
65909 11/16/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC
65909 11/16/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS
65909 11/16/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
GARMIN PC CABLE FOR STATIONS
ALARM MONITORING:PD SATELLITE
ALARM MONITORING:POLICE STOREF
3RO QTR PROPERTY TAX REPORTS
REFUND:MUSIC-PLAY MUSIC BY EAR
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
BBQ REPLACEMENT:FIRE STN 12
BBG REPLACEMENT:FIRE STN 12
OVEN HERLACEMENF:FIRE STN 84
OVEN REPLACEMENT:FIRE STN 84
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
RES IMPR PROM:JONES-GARAGE DR
RES IMPR PRGM:JONES-WINDOWS
RES IMPR PROM:JONES-SCREEN DH
RES IMPR PRGM:MARTIN-FRONT DR
RES IMPR PRGM:MARTIN-GARAGE DR
CRC HANDLES FOR OPERABLE WALLS
H.R. CONF:O1/24-25:GUTIERREZ
NETWORK EQUIPMENT MNTC/REPAIRS
RES IMPR PROM: FLORES, RAUL
PUB SAFETY EXPO LIVE BROAOCABT
OVRPMT OF BLOG PERMIT:BO0-0561
OVRPMT OF BLDG PERMIT:SO0-0561
OVRPMT OF BLDG PERMIT:BO0-1550
OVRPMT OF BLDG PERMIT:BO0-1550
HALLOWEEN TRICK-OR-TREAT BAGS
FREIGHT
HVAC PREVENTIVE NNTC:CITY HALL
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:MNTC FAC
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:SR CTR
NVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:CRC
HVAD PREVENTIVE MMTC:TCC
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-999-5221
001-170-999-5229
001-170-999-5229
001-140-999-5248
190-183-4982
190-2900
001-171-999-5212
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5212
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5212
001-171-~99-5242
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
165-199-813-5804
190-182-999-5212
001-150-999-5261
320-199-999-5248
165-199-813-5804
001-110-999-5278
001-162-4285
001-2280
001-162-4285
001-2280
190-183-999-5370
190-185-999-5370
340-199-701-5250
340-199-702-5250
190-181-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-184-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
45.49
81.00
60.00
2,400.00
20.00
100.00
215.51
518.09
89.64
215.51
25.65
56.85
2,242.44
327.78
87.28
678.07
765.00
35.00
399.00
550.40
1,817.50
250.00
217.58
13.62
402.00
27.76
193.14
19.95
675.00
37.50
37.50
453.75
93.75
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
45.49
141.00
2,400.00
20.00
100.00
1,119.25
2,242.44
327.78
87.28
678.07
765.00
35.00
399.00
550.40
1,817.50
250.00
660.76
213.09
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00 11:43
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65909 11/16/00
65910 11/16/00
65911 11/16/00
65912 11/16/00
65912 11/16/00
65913 11/16/00
65914 11/16/00
65914 11/16/00
65914 11/16/00
65915 11/16/00
65916 11/16/00
65917 11/16/00
65917 11/16/00
65917 11/16/00
65918 11/16/00
65919 11/16/00
65919 11/16/00
65920 11/16/00
65921 11/16/00
65922 11/16/00
65922 11/16/00
65922 11/16/00
65922 11/16/00
65923 11/16/00
65923 11/16/00
65924 11/16/00
65925 11/16/00
65925 11/16/00
65925 11/16/00
65926 11/16/00
65927 11/16/00
65928 11/16/00
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC
KIRKPATRICK, JEFF
003631 KLEINFELDER INC
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
HVAC PREVENTIVE MNTC:MUSEUM
RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS SETTLMNT
dUN-JUL GEOTECH SVCS:PALA BDGE
SUPPLIES FOR STENCIL TRUCK
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE SUPPLIES FOR STENCIL TRUCK
000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC
MNTC SUPPLIES FOR PW WORK CREW
001085 L N CURTIS & SONS AIM 02 SENSOR FOR STATION
001085 L N CURTIS & SONS FREIGHT
001085 L N CURTIS & SONS SALES TAX
000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC
BUS SVC:KNOTTS SCARY FARM
LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR ANIMAL LICENSE FEE PAID @ CITY
002863 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC
002863 LAWSON PROOUCTS INC
002863 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC
LEDFORD, ANDREA
004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC
004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC
LONNIE SMITH CONSTRUCTI
003428 M V P TEMECULA SHUTTLE
004141 MAINTEX INC
004141 MAINTEX INC
004141 MAINTEX INC
004141 MAINTEX
004307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS
004307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS
004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA
000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC
000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC
000220 MAURICE PRINTERS
000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I
004208 MILANOS
003678 MILLENNIUM Ill SYSTEMS
MNTC SUPPLIES FOR PW WORK CREW
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
REFUND: EXERCISE-HATNA YOGA
TES POOL LGHTS & ADAPTER RING
TES POOL LGNTS & ADAPTER RING
REFUND: LDOO-O27GR PRMT DEPST
SHUTTLE SVC-LAX:VOORBERG:IO/20
SR CTR CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL CUSTOOIAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
CRC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
TEM. DUCK POND EVALUATION SVCS
ADD~L EVALUATION SERVICES
10/30-11/08 CONSULTING SVCS
QTY 150 DAFR COMBS
CAFR DIVIDER TABS
QTY 150 CAFR COVERS
TOOLS & EGUIPMENT-TRAFFIC DIV.
RFRSHMNTS:FOREST CITY MTG:11/1
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-185-999-5250
300-199-999-5207
210-165-631-5801
001-164-601-5242
001-164-601-5242
001-164-601-5218
001-171-999-5215
001-171-999-5215
001-171-999-5215
190-183-999-5320
001-161-4255
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
190-183-4982
190-186-999-5212
190-186-999-5212
001-2670
001-101-999-5280
190-181-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
340-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-161-999-5248
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-164-602-5242
001-110-999-5260
320-199-999-5221
ITEM
AMOUNT
112.50
900.00
14,715.00
758.40
66.85
24.24
390.00
11.75
30.23
527.83
16.00
351.00
11.16
27.20
48.00
805.60
250.00
995.00
200.00
50.21
50.21
94.69
94.69
250.00
110.00
1,924.00
43.10
1~066.73
906.18
1,583.93
65.40
203.65
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,410.00
900.00
14,715.00
825.25
24.24
431.98
527.83
16.00
389.36
48.00
1,055.60
995.00
200.00
289.80
360.00
1,924.00
2,016.01
1,583.93
65.40
203.65
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00 11:43
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65929 11/16/00
65929 11/16/00
65929 11/16/00
65929 11/16/00
65930 11/16/00
65930 11/16/00
65930 11/16/00
65931 11/16/00
65932 11/16/00
65933 11/16/00
65934 11/16/00
65935 11/16/00
65936 11/16/00
65937 11/16/00
65938 11/16/00
65939 11/16/00
65940 11/16/00
65941 11/16/00
65941 11/16/00
65941 11/16/00
65941 11/16/00
65942 11/16/00
65943 11/16/00
65943 11/16/00
65944 11/16/00
65944 11/16/00
65944 11/16/00
65945 11/16/00
65945 11/16/00
65945 11/16/00
65946 11/16/00
65947 11/16/00
VENDOR
NUMBER
001384
001384
001384
001384
000973
000973
000973
004020
001868
003790
000437
004378
000230
003996
002925
003899
002139
002139
002139
002139
001710
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTION
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
WINDOW ENVELOPES - FINANCE DPT
SALES TAX
BUSINESS CARDS: Z.SMITH
SALES TAX
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI VARIOUS PARKS PLAYGROUND EQUIP
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI FREIGHT
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUI SALES TAX
MISSION INN FOUNDATION SENIOR CTR EXCURSION 12/06/00
MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MOCKINGBIRD NURSERIES
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
MULLER, JANICE M.
MUNIFINANCIAL
MUSIC HERITAGE, INC.
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NATIONAL BUSINESSWOMEN'
NORRIS, DON B. & KAREN
NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT
NOVELL
LDSCP-PALA BRIDGE IMPRV/97-15
PREPARE ANNUAL STATE REPORTS
· TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ARBITRAGE REBATE SERVICES
FY 00-01 CSF PROGP~RM AWARD
MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-PW
LDRSHP SEM:PB:12/15:613-120540
CFD 88-12 REIMBURSEMENT
RECRUIT AD:VARIOUS POSITIONS
RECRUIT AD:MAINTENANCE WORKER
RECRUIT AD=ACCOUNTING ASST.
RECRUIT AD:ASST ENGINEER
RENEW ANNUL SUSSCR.- APPNOTES
00396/+ OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING
003966 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES - PLANNING
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
002105 OLD T~N TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT
004070 PACIFIC DESIGN CONCEPTS PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES:TEM.HILLS
004070 PACIFIC DESIGN CONCEPTS FREIGHT
004070 PACIFIC DESIGN CONCEPTS SALES TAX
PAIGE, JOANIE
000~33 PARTY PZAZZ
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
SUPPLIES/COUNCIL WRKSHP:10/17
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-181-999-5301
190-183-999-5330
210-165-631-5804
001-140-999-5248
190-183-999-5330
390-199-999-5248
001-101-999-5267
001-164-601-5215
001-140-999-5261
001-2030
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999-5254
320-199-999-5228
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-164-601-5214
001-164-601-5214
001-165-999-5214
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-2900
001-100-999-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
344.58
26.70
38.25
2.96
482.40
37.72
37.39
70.00
480.00
2,788.85
1,040.00
285.60
1,250.00
1,000.00
33.91
69.00
37,276.94
129.80
14.16
14.16
14.16
89.00
45.51
6.45
95.23
47.50
44.51
96.00
5.00
7.44
100.00
70.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
412.49
557.51
70.00
480.00
2,788.85
1,040.00
285.60
1,250.00
1,000.00
33.91
69.00
37,276.94
172.28
89.00
51.96
187.24
108.44
100.00
70.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
11/16/00 11:43 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE 7
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
65948 11/16/00 002331 PEP BOYS INC
MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CRW 001~164-601-5214
ITEM
AMOUNT
4.82
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 25,992.67
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 651.49
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,654.01
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192'2390 11.61
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 371.85
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194'2390 98.68
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERB RET 280'2390 282.59
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 127.80
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 1,095.27
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 210.41
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 580.83
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 140.96
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 96.59
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERB (EMPLOYEEB~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.87
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 18.42
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390 .05
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.54
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .36
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .92
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 3.72
65949 11/16/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 1.39
65949 11/16/00 000246 PRES (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.65
65950 11/16/00 000580 PHOTO WORKS OCT FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPMENT 001-165-999-5250
65950 11/16/00 000580 PHOTO ~RKS OCT FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPMENT 001-111-999-5250
65950 11/16/00 000580 PHOTO ~ORKS OCT FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPMENT 190-185-999-5250
65950 11/16/00 000580 PHOTO WORKS OCT FILM & PHOTO OEVELOPMERT 190-180-999-5250
65951 11/16/00 PLECHNER, LISA REFUND: EXERCISE - HATHA YOGA 190-183-4982
65952 11/16/00 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230
65952 11/16/00 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230
OCT VAR. PUBLIC NOTICES:C.CLRK
OCT PUBLIC NOTICE:O0-0335
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW
001-120-999-5256
001~161-999-5256
001-164-601-5238
65953 11/16/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
65953 11/16/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN
65954 11/16/00 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT
65955 11/16/00 PROMENADE-PCB, L.P. REFUND:ERG DEPOSIT:LD98-O50GR 001-2670
QUEST ENVIRONMENTAL
R J M DESIGN GROUP IRC
RANCHO ARMY NAVY
HAZ-MAT DISPOSAL SERVICES 001~164-601-5430
SEPT REIMBURSABLES:AQUATIC FAC 210-190-170-5802
SUPPLIES-FIRE EXPLORER PRGM 001-171-999-5235
DUPL.SLUEPR]NTB:PALA RD ]MPRV 210~165-668-5802
DUPL.BLUEPRINTS:MARGARITA RD. 210-165-706-5801
65956 11/16/00 003687
65957 11/16/00 004029
65958 11/16/00 004272
65959 11/16/00 000947
65959 11/16/00 000947
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
22.28
30.12
11.31
7.31
43.00
35.25
21.25
123.78
19.50
107.74
1,990.00
1,000.00
519.99
269.35
7.25
6.46
CHECK
AMOUNT
4.82
34,346.14
71.02
43.00
56.50
143.28
107.74
1,990.00
1,000.00
519.99
269.35
13.71
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00 11:43
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOUS
PAGE 8
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
HUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
65960 11/16/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
65960 11/16/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65961 11/16/00 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
65962 11/16/00 003490 RANCHO MUSIC ASSOCIATIO
65963 11/16/00 RIO HONDO COLLEGE
65964 11/16/00
65965 11/16/00
65966 11/16/00
65967 11/16/00
003072 RIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRI
001365 RIVERSIDE CO ENVIRONMEN
000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
65968 11/16/00 SANTA MARGARITA WATERSH
65969 11/16/00 003492 SCHOLASTIC SPORTS
65970 11/16/00 000645 SMART & FINAL
65970 11/16/00 000645 SMART & FINAL INC
65971 11/16/00 000722 SO CALF ASSN CODE ENF.O
65972 11/16/00 000374 SO CALIF EDISON
65973 11/16/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
65973 11/16/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
65975 11/16/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
65975 11/16/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
659T3 11/16/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
65973 11/16/00 000537 SO CALIF ED[SON
65973 11/16/00 000537 $0 CALIF EDISON
65973 11/16/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
65974 11/16/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
65974 11/16/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
65974 11/16/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
65974 11/16/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
65974 11/16/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
65974 11/16/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
65974 11/16/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & CAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS
CITY VEHICLE DETAILING
FY 00-01 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
FIRE PREV.CLASS:ND/DM:12/18-21
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-162-999-5214
001-110-999-5214
001-110-999-5263
001-165-999-5214
001-163-999-5214
001-161-999-5263
001-161-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
001-101-999-5267
001-171-999-5261
FIRE PREV CLASS:PA:12/04-07/O0 001-171-999-5261
FY 00-01 CSF PROGRAM AWARD 001-101-999-5267
JUL-SEP 2000 VECTOR CONTROL SV 001-172-999-5255
RECRUITMENT AD:PW INSPECTOR 001-150-999-5254
FY 00-01 CSF PROGRAM AWARD 001-101-999-5267
'00 WINTER PRGM/MEDIA GUIDE AD 001-100-999-5250
MISC SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE
MISC SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL
001-140-999-5250
340-199-701-5250
SCACEO CERT PRG-M.SALAZAR:12/1 001-161-999-5261
UPGRD TRF SGNL-R.V./MIRA LOMA 210-165-709-5804
NOV 2-21~506-3884 OVERLAND
NOV 2-00~397-5059 VARIOUS MTRS
NOV 2-20-965-5166 MARGARITA RD
NOV 2-07-626-6063 R.VISTA SPH
NOV 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS MTRS
NOV 2-18-017-8972 MARGARITA RD
NOV 2-20-140-9299 VAR[ODS MTRS
NOV 2~18-589-97'59 MARGARITA RD
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5319
NOV 095"197-7907-2 STN #84
NOV VARIOUS GAS METERS
NOV VARIOUS GAS METERS
NOV VARIOUS CAS METERS
NOV VARIOUS GAS METERS
NOV VARIOUS GAS METERS
NOV VARIOUS GAS METERS
001-171-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
190-186-999-5240
190-1~-999-5240
190-185-999-5240
ITEM
AMOUNT
3,025.70
860.78
39.00
24.00
83.36
8.00
24.00
22.25
6.00
18.00
3,000.00
170.00
85.00
2,000.00
452.99
490.81
2,500.00
235.00
39.29
6.44
60.00
528.00
43.65
3,883.99
14.65
12.53
5,338.13
204.03
518.47
61.06
145.19
3.80
29.56
42.72
2,999.43
22.56
68.64
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,~.48
224.61
3,000.00
170.00
85.00
2,000.00
452.99
490.81
2,500.00
235.00
45.73
60.00
528.00
10,076.51
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00 11:43
VOUCRER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
65974 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65975 11/16/00
65976 11/16/00
6597-/ 11/16/00
65978 11/16/00
65979 11/16/00
65979 11/16/00
65979 11/16/00
65980 11/16/00
65980 11/16/00
65981 11/16/00
65982 11/16/00
65982 11/16/00
65982 11/16/00
65982 11/16/00
65983 11/16/00
65984 11/16/00
65985 11/16/00
65986 11/16/00
65987 11/16/00
65988 11/16/00
65989 11/16/00
65990 11/16/00
65991 11/16/00
65991 11/16/00
65992 11/16/00
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAJ4E
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH CO[JNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST COMTR
SOUTHWEST FAMILY YMCA
SOUTHWEST HISPANIC DHAM
SZEPKOUSKI~ CORI
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
003677 TEMEOULA MOTORSPORTS LL
00567;' TEMECULA MOTOMSPOMTS LL
TEMECULA SOCCER CLUB
000507 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY
000307 TEMEDULA TROPHY COMPANY
003985 TEMECULA VALLEY COMPUTE
004118 TEMECULA VALLEY GENEALO
000311 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC
001403 TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER
003598 TEMECULA VINTAGE SINGER
TEMEKU HILLS DEVELOPMEN
000668 TINNY O PRODUCTIONS
000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRG
004313 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS
004313 TRI-COUNTY OFFICIALS
003228 U S BANK TRUST NATIONAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
NOV VARIOUS GAS METERS
PEST CONTROL SERVICES-CRC
PEST CONTROL SERVICES'TCC
PEST CONTROL SERVICES'TES POOL
PEST CONTROL BERVlCES-WED.DHPL
PEST CONTROL SERVICES-STN #84
PEST CONTROL SERVICES'MNTC FAC
PEST CONTROL SERVICES-MUSEUM
PEST CONTROL SERVlCES-SR.CTR.
FY 00-01 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
FY 00'01CSF PROGRAM AWARD
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
MISG SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT
NISD SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT
MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT
MOTORCYCLE REPAIB/MAINT:TEM PD
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PD
FY 00-01 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
NAMETAGS:M.WIECHEC/B.BESWICK
NAJ4ETAGS:M.WIECHEC/S.BESWICK
NAMETAGS:M.NORRIS/B.LEVY
NAMETAGS:M.NORRIS/B.LEVY
FY 00-01CSF PROGRAM AWARD
FY 00-01CSF AWARD
FY 00-01 CSF AWARD
FY 00-01CSF PROGRAM AWARD
FY 00-01CSF PROGRAM AWARD
REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD98-O62GR
ENTRTNMNT-HIGH HOPES PRG-9/15
1ST QTR EMERG.RESPONSE VOL.PRG
10/16-10/31 SPORTS OFFICIAL SV
10/01-10/15 SPORTS OFFICIAL SV
TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES TCSD COP~S
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-702-5240
190-182-999-5250
190-184-999-5250
190-1~-999-5250
190-185-999-5250
001-171-999-5250
340-199-702-5250
190-185-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
001-101-999-5267
001-101-999-5267
190-2900
001-163-999-5220
001-165-999-5220
001-164-604-5220
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-101-999-5267
001-165-999-5250
190-180-999-5222
001-165-999-5250
001-171-999-5222
001-101-999-5267
001-101-999-5267
001-101-999-5267
001-101-999-5267
001-101-999-5267
001-2670
190-183-999-5320
001-171-999-5274
190-187-999-5250
190-187-999-5250
390-199-999-5227
ITEM
AMOUNT
73.08
42.00
36.00
39.00
32.00
48.00
40.00
42.00
29.00
2,500.00
5,000.00
100.00
46.10
46.10
46.11
55.79
105.99
1,000.00
7.01
7.00
7.00
7.01
500.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
1,791.92
100.00
1,620.00
71.00
70.00
4,180.00
PAGE 9
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,384.98
308.00
2,500.00
5,000.00
100.00
138.31
161.78
1,000.00
28.02
500.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
1,000.00
1,791.92
100.00
1,620.00
141.00
4,180.00
VOUCHRE2
11/16/00
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
65993
65993
65993
65994
65995
65995
65996
65997
65998
65998
65999
65999
65999
65999
65999
65999
65999
65999
66000
66001
66001
66001
66001
66001
11:43
CHECK
DATE
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
VENDOR
NUMBER
002065
002065
002065
000332
004261
004261
0042?9
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
UNISOURCE
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
VOYLES, RICK!
WASEK, JOSEPH JR.
WASEK, JOSEPH JR.
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WRXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
003301 WORKERS WARMUPS
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
PAPER SUPPLIES FOR COPY CENTER
PAPER SUPPLIES FOR COPY CENTER
PAPER SUPPLIES FOR COPY CENTER
APPLICATION DEV.CONSULTING SVC
NOV XXX-1941 PTA CD TTACSD
NOV XXX-5072 GENERAL USAGE
NOV ACCESS-RVSD CO OPEN LINE
REFUND: EXERCISE - HATHA YOGA
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-162-999-5250
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-183-4982
REFUND:EHG DEPOSIT:LD99-O40GR 001-2670
REFUND: K-RAT FEE PAYMENT 001-2300
VAR. PARK/FAC. SITES SUPPLIES
VAR. PARK/FAC. SITES SUPPLIES
VAR. PARK/FAC. SITES SUPPLIES
VAR. PARK/FAC. SITES SUPPLIES
VAR. PARK/FAC. SITES SUPPLIES
VAR. PARK/FAC. SITES SUPPLIES
VAR. PARK/FAC. SITES SUPPLIES
SALES TAX
WORKERS WARMUPS HANDOUTS
JUL-SEP BASE CHRG 2510 COPIER
OCT LEASE DC220 COPIER
OCT MAINT/SUPPL. DC220 COPIER
OCT INTEREST DC220 COPIER
MAINTENANCE ON P~ FAX MACHINE
190-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-184-999-5212
190-185-999-5212
340-199-701-5212
340-199-702-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-150-999-5261
330-199-999-5217
330-2800
330-199-999-5217
330-199-999-5391
330-199-999-5217
ITEM
AMOUNT
116.93
2,106.70
585.09
1,800.00
57.03
5,785.31
320.00
43.00
995.00
250.00
67.40
67.40
33.70
33.70
33.70
67.40
33.70
26.12
229.00
123.00
124.74
8~.76
50.66
208.00
PAGE 10
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,808.72
1,800.00
5,842.34
320.00
43.00
1,2~5.00
363.12
229.00
591.16
TOTAL CHECKS 246,755.85
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE 2
11/16/00 12:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE AHOUNT
001 CENERAL FUND 134,961.55
190 COt4MUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 41,218.00
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 22,253.0D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 148,025.78
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 17,705.98
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL 364,705.31
VOUCHER2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
11/16/00 12:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CNECK
HUMBER DATE
66004 11/28/00
66004 11/28/00
66005 11/28/00
66005 11/28/00
66005 11/28/00
66005 11/28/00
66006 11/28/00
~006 11/28/00
66007 11/28/00
66007 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66000 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66000 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66008 11/28/00
66009 11/28/00
66010 11/28/00
66011 11/28/00
66011 11/28/00
66011 11/28/00
66011 11/28/00
66012 11/28/00
66013 11/28/00
66014 11/28/00
66014 11/28/00
66015 11/28/00
66016 11/28/00
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
001515 A S A P TRUCK,TRACTOR/F
001515 A S A P TRUCK,TRACTOR/F
003567 C C MYERS INC
003567 C C MYERS INC
003567 C C MYERS INC
003567 C C MYERS INC
003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR
003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR
002900 DANIEL MANN JOHNSON
002900 DANIEL MANN JOHNSON
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
004115 K T U & ASSOCIATES
003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERV!
002800 PACIFIC STRIPING INC
002800 PACIFIC STRIPING IRC
002800 PACIFIC STRIPING INC
002800 PACIFIC STRIPING INC
003218 PELA
004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP IRC
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
003730 WEST COAST ARSORISTS IN
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
WEED ABATEMENT:VARIOUS SITES 001-161-999-5440
NEED ABATEMENT:VARIOUS SITES 001-161-999-5440
OCT PRGSS:OVRLD DR PW95-11 210-165-604-5804
EEL STOP NOTICE: CEMEX, USA 210-2038
RETENTION FOR OCT PEGS:PR95-11 210-2035
STOP NOTICE: CEMEX, USA 210-2038
SEP INSPECTION EVE:lET ST BRDG 280-199-807-5801
SEP-OCT FIRST ST BRIDGE INSPEE 280-199-807-5801
MAY-JUN DESIGN SVC:PALA PH II 210-165-668-5802
JUL DESIGN SVCS:PALA PHASE II 210-165-668-5802
OCT LDSCP SVCS:NEIGH/STREETSCP 190-180-999-5415
OCT LDSCP EVES: SPORTS PARKS
OCT LDSCP SVCS:MEDIANS
OCT LDSCP SVCS: SOUTH SLOPES
OCT LDSCP EVES: NORTH SLOPES
OCT LDSCP SVCS: CRC
OCT LDSCP EVES: SR CTR
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
OCT LDSCP SVCS:C.HALL/MNTC FAC 340-199-701-5415
OCT LDSCP SVCS: TCC 190-184-999-5415
OCT LDSCP SVCS: FiRE STN 8/* 001-171-999-5212
OCT LDSCP SVCS:OLD TNN PRKLOT 001-164-603-5415
OCT LOSCP SVCS:OLD TNN STRTSCP 001-164-603-5415
OCT LDSCP SVCS: MUSEUM 190-185-999-5415
AUG SVCS:TEM MULTI-USE TRAILS 210-190-176-5802
OCT SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285
PRGS PMT#1-VAR.STREET STRIPING 001-164-601-5410
PRGS PMT#1-VAR.STREET STRIPING 001-164-602-5410
PEGS PMT#2-VAR.STREET STRIPING 001-16/*-601-5410
PEGS PMT#2-VAR.STREET STRIPING 001-164-602-5410
OCT PLAN CHECK SVCS-PLANNING 001-161-999-5250
SEP PROF SVCS:TEM.AQUATIC FAC. 210-190-170-5802
AUG 2000 BOOKING FEES
SEPT 2000 BOOKING FEES
001-170-999-5273
001-170-999-5273
OCT 2000 PLAN CHECK SVCS - B&S 001-162-999-5248
CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING MAINT. 001-164-601-5402
5,000.00
2,117.85
1,500.00
461.81
150.00-
461.81-
9,064.00
8,641.98
29,675.15
58,293.07
11,635.00
25,325.00
1,975.00
13,375.00
8,878.00
1,444.00
361.00
541.00
193.00
400,00
250.00
987.00
285.00
20,380.00
10,777.20
12,562.73
1,256.27
49,004.78
4,900.48
6,405.00
38,327.56
11,923.20
11,150.40
6,712.14
11,514.50
7,117.85
1,350.00
17,705.98
87,968.22
65,649.00
20,380.00
10,777.20
67,724.26
6,405.00
38,327.56
23,073.60
6,712.14
11,514.50
TOTAL CHECKS 364,705.31
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE~_~____
CITY MANAGER
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
November 28, 2000
Liability Insurance Renewal
PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City of Temecula Liability Insurance
Policy Renewal with Insurance Company of the West, in the amount of $113,170 for general liability
and automobile physical damage insurance for the period of December 1,2000, through December 1,
2001.
DISCUSSION: In preparation of the City's Liability Insurance Policy with Insurance Company of
the West (ICW) expiring on December 1, 2000, staff requested that the City's insurance broker, Cal-
Surance, market the City for liability and auto physical damage insurance. In response to this request,
CaI-Surance obtained three proposals from the following companies in the amounts listed below:
These premiums have been quoted with $50K, $75K, and $100K self-insured retentions (SIR).
Insurance Company of the West
General Liability/Auto Physical Damage
Genesis Insurance Company
General Liability/Auto Physical Damage
Royal Indemnity Company
General Liability/Auto Physical Damage
$50K SIR $75K SIR $100K SIR
$113,170 $101,435 $ 96,060
0 $117,838 0
0 0 $126,416
ICW, the City's current insurance carrier, provided the most competitive proposal. ICW has an "A"
rating and is an admitted carrier with a financial size category of VIII. This proposal by ICW is for
coverage of $20 million per occurrence and $24 million aggregate for a fixed premium of $113,170,
which is $31,520 higher than last year's premium. The total premium of $113,170 is broken down
between general liability ($102,999) automobile physical damage ($10,171). This proposal covers the
entire year, regardless of changes in the City's operating status. Considering the City's increasing
exposure associated with growth, increased activities, and an expanded vehicle pool, staff
recommends that the City accept ICW's proposal. The below schedule of past years' general liability
insurance premiums only are provided for your review:
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Premium $103,000 $98,633 $90,966 $92,205 $92,761 $71,283 $72,750 $102,999
Policy Limits $5 Mil $5 Mil $5 Mil $10 Mil $15 Mil $20 Mil $20 Mil $20 Mil
The above premium history represents a very favorable liability market for the past two years as a $20
million policy purchased for less then $75,000. However, the current premium in comparison with
premiums paid in 1993 to 1995 is very competitive when taking into consideration the policy limits of
$5 million versus the current policy limit of $20 million.
Genesis Insurance Company has provided the second most competitive proposal with a fixed
premium including general liability/physical damage coverage. Genesis Insurance Company provided
a proposal of $117,838 for coverage for the entire year regardless of changes in the City's operating
status. However, this proposal is for a SIR of $75,000 and is $16,403 more than the ICW proposal with
a $75,000 SIR.
Royal Indemnity Company was the third most competitive proposal but the annual liability premium
cost of $126~416 is substantially more than the ICW proposal and it is quoted based on a SIR of
$100,000.
Based on the information provided herein, staff recommends that the City renew liability and
automobile physical damage coverage with ICW, for coverage, from December 1, 2000, through
December 1, 2001, for an annual premium of $113,170 which will maintain a self insured retention of
$50,000. After review of the City's loss history and based on the quoted premium difference of
$11,735 between the $50,000 and $75,000 SIR liability insurance policy, staff recommends
maintaining the $50,000 SIR. However, because of the City's anticipated growth and increasing
insurance premiums, it may be necessary to consider increasing the self insured retention at next
year's renewal.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted and are available in Insurance Fund
Account 300-199-999-5200 for the general liability and automobile damage premium.
Attachment: Insurance Company of the West Proposal
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST PROPOSAL
TERM: December 1, 2000 - December 1,2001
FORMAT: Occurrence
NAMED INSURED: City of Temecula
Temecula Community Services District
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
Winchester Hills Financing Authority
Temecula Public Facilities Financing Corporation
SELF-INSURED RETENTION (SIR):$50,000
TOTAL LIMITS/COVERAGE
MUNICIPAL GENERAL LIABILITY OVER SIR
$20,000,000 Occurrence/S24,000,000 Aggregate
PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S ERRORS & OMISSIONS OVER SIR
$20,000,000 Occurrence/Aggregate
MUNICIPAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY OVER SIR
$20,000,000 Occurrence/No Aggregate
TOTAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COST
TOTAL AUTOMOBILE PHYSICAL DAMAGE ENDORSEMENT
TOTAL COMBINED ANNUAL PREMIUM COST
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
INCLUDED
$102,999
$ 101171
$113.170
NOTE: The above quote includes the combined totals for Primary and Excess Limits Coverage
ITEM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~E~
CiTY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official
November 28,2000
First Amendment to the Agreement with Melad and Associates
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Approve a First Amendment to the Agreement with Melad and Associates in the amount of
$40,000.
2. Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $4,000.
BACKGROUND: The Building and Safety Department has utilized the services of Melad and
Associates to supplement its regular inspection staff since October of 1999. In July 2000 the City
Manager approved a contract for $20,000.00 plus a 10% contingency of $2,000 for a total of
$22,000. This contract was intended to provide supplemental inspection support until additional
staff, approved through the budget process, was hired. The additional staff began work in late
August, however, the construction activity and subsequent inspection workload remains high.
Therefore, staff is recommending that this Amendment be approved to allow for the continued use of
supplemental inspection staff on a two (2) day per week schedule and maintaining availability during
holiday periods and vacations. The amount of this First Amendment is $40,000 and a 10%
contingency in the amount of $4000 which will bring the total contract price to $66,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: Building inspections are supported by building permit revenue collected. There
are currently adequate funds available in Account No. 001-162-999-5118, "Temporary Help" for this
purpose.
ATTACHMENT: First Amendment to Agreement with Melad and Associates.
R:\BROCKMEIIAGENDA\FIRST AMENDMENT MELAD. DOC ] 11/16/00
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
TEMECULA AND
MELAD AND ASSOCIATES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of NOVEMBER 28, 2000 by and
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City" and MELAD AND ASSOCIATES
("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On July 1,2000 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement
entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement").
Amendment.
The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
2. Section 4a of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the
payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in
Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time
spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment
rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not
exceed an additional amount of forty thousand ($40,000) dollars for the
total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as
provided in this Agreement for a total of sixty thousand ($60,000) dollars.
Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to
those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in
advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be
compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner
as agreed to by City Council and Consultant at the time City's written
authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services.
The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent
(10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum
exceed sixty six thousand ($66,000) dollars. Any additional work in excess
of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.
3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
BY:
Melad and Associates
NAME:
Jose Melad
TITLE:
BY:
NAME:
TITLE:
R.' ~BROC'IO,4EIMGM~i~L~IEIM D -AMENDMENT 2000 I ST AMENDMEAvI~ DOC 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
MELAD AND ASSOCIATES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July '1, 2000, between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Melad and Associates, ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2000, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June
30, 2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set
forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
.4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and
Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full,
based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment
rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Twenty Thousand..
Dollars and no Cents ($20,000) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein,
unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager.
Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as
agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to
Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional ,~ork
not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum
exceed twenty two thousand dollars ($22,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount
shall be approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
PV~greements\Consultant 99 I
5. SUSPENSION OR
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by wdtten notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence
of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the
event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the
right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be cleady identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary,
and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
~ b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all odginal documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing
data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of
providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property
of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission
of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work,
FAAgreements\Consultant 99 2
Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the
necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and
printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert
witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may
sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage
to properb/arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions adsing out of or in
any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability
arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of
Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, directed or indirect, in the contract of
the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractodconsultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board
member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula, has any interest, whether contractual, non-
contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party
other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either
party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in wdting, to
the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under
Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division
4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injudes to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commemial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement
to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has
no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall
execute a declaration that it has no employees.
(4)
Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
P~Agreements~Consuttant 99 3
bo
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
projectJlocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4)
Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
(2)
(3)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied
or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
P~,greements/Consultam 99 4
(4)
(5)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' pdor written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
currant A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with odginal
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be
on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City
before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements
effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City
nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of
Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,
employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall
not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind
City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by
failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
P~Agreements\Consultant 99
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without
written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily
provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or
other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project
or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
Melad and Associates
8907 Warner Ave. Suite 161
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this
Agreement, only Inspectors shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Services under
this Agreeme,nt. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of
Consultant from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the City shall
have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said
notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
F~Agreements~Consultant 99 6
16. LICENSES. At all times dudng the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the dghts, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief
granted.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or wdtten,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entedng
into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's
own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
10. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
Attest:
F~Agreernents~Consultant 99
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Melad and Associates
By: ~'
Name~0se Melad
Title: ~)Z> ~ t ~ ~---'~./~"-"'
By:
Name:
Title:
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
EXHIBIT A
F~Agreements\Consultant 99 8
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
To perform Inspection Services for the City of Temecula.
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
Building Inspector II
Mileage Charge
(Inspector use of personal vehicle)
$40.O0/hr
,325
P~Agreements\Consultant 99 10
ITEM 6
APPROVAL .,~
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~
CITY MANAGER '.~._
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManageflCity Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works
November 28, 2000
Public Works Maintenance Agreements
PREPARED BY: Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the minor maintenance and construction
agreements with:
Monteleone Contractors, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $100,000
Walter K. Becker (dba Becker Engineering), in an amount not to exceed $100,000
Rene's Commercial Management, in an amount not to exceed $100,000
BACKGROUND: Each year the City enters into numerous maintenance and construction
agreements with various contractors that perform minor (small job) maintenance and construction jobs.
These jobs usually range in cost from over $1,000 to under $25,000 and involve miscellaneous repairs
to drainage areas, sidewalks, curbs, cutters, and storm drains to include excavation. Nevertheless,
each job requires an agreement between the City and the contractor. In an effort to streamline these
contractual requirements, staff has taken measures to place under agreement three contractors that are
very capable of performing these routine jobs with little notice. Essentially, these agreements will give
staff administrative tools needed to efficiently execute minor maintenance and construction work by
having executed agreements which satisfy insurance, prevailing wage requirements, terms and
conditions as well as a general scope of work. This contracting technique is widely used by cities to
employ a higher more responsive maintenance capability. Also, in the event of harsh weather that can
impinge the safety of the City roadways, and other City maintained areas, these agreements can
facilitate an expedient reaction and resolution to advise conditions without jeopardizing administrative
requirements. It is important to understand that the not to exceed $100,000 amount does not
necessarily mean it will be spent but rather is a ceiling to operate below on an as needed basis.
Although some jobs may be better accomplished by one contractor because of equipment availability,
timing issues and job location, every effort will be made by staff to distribute the work load evenly
between the three contractors. The contractor will be responsible for providing a work proposal for each
job, which must be approved by staff before any work is started.
1
r:\agdrpt\00\l 128\Maint Agreements.AGN/ajp
Staff mailed letters to five (5) contractors in the local area that could meet the described minor
maintenance and construction needs. The letters requested time and material pricing for both labor and
equipment rates. It also included holiday and overnight rates. Three (3) out of the five (5) contractors
responded and provided competitive labor and equipment rates as seen in Exhibit "A" of each
agreement. Review of these rates has determined they are consistent with current prevailing wages and
current hourly equipment rates previously paid by the City. The contractors listed below responded to
the request for time and material rates and are recommended for not to exceed $100,000 agreements
for a one (1) year term.
Company
Monteleone Contractors, Inc.
Amount not to Exceed Term
$100,000 1 year
Walter K. Becker (dba Becker Engineering) $100,000
1 year
Rene's Commercial Management
$100,000 1 year
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2000-01 Public Work's,
Maintenance Division operating budget.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Contractor Mailing List
2. Contracts
2
r:~agdrpt\00\1128\Maint Agreements. AGN/ajp
Contractor Mailin.q List
NPG Corporation (Nelson Paving)
P.O. Box 1515
Perris, CA 92575
Del Rio Enterprise
42181 Avenida Alvarado
Temecula, CA 92590
Walter K. Becker (dba Becker Engineering)
P.O. Box 890365
Temecula, CA 92589-0365
Rene Commercial Management
1002 Luna Way
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Monteleone Contractors, inc.
39054 Camino Hermosa
Murrieta, CA 92563
3
r:~agdrpt\00\1128\Maint Agreements. AGN/ajp
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION
ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR
CITYWIDE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, made and entered into as of November 28, 2000
by and between the City of Temecula, and Monteleone Contractors, Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of
the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor recognizes' that the Contract for Annual Construction
Contract for Citywide Routine Maintenance is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship for the
future repair, improvement, maintenance and/or construction of City of Temecula real and personal property.
Contractor agrees that, from time to time, and on a non-written work assignments("O fret"), the written work
assignment/Offers will include a detailed scope of work, plans and specifications for the scope of work and
the time(s) for performance. The Contractor shall either accept the Offer or reject it within five (5) business
days after the date the City dispatches the Offer to Contractor.
2. COST OF WORK. For the Work described in Section 1. of this Agreement Contractor
shall receive the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($100,000.00) payable in
accordance with the Schedule of Payments, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. This
amount, One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents, shall not exceed the attached scope of work unless
additional payment is approved as provided by this Agreement.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of
this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized
in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in
the amounts and in the manner as agreed by the City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written
authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services.
3. PAYMENT. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-
disputed fees. If the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30
days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
4. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best
of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a
minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Contractor
shall cause a full time experienced Superintendent to be present on the site during all construction and to
oversee and supervise the Work.
5. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and
the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance.
I
R:\maintain\workordersWlonteleone Annual agrmt
6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 2.,
above, Contractor shall submit to the City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this
contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against the
City under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment.
Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for
payment.
7. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the
general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman
needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are
on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor
shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and
1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the
District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or
mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by
him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
8. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suSPension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay
to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work
performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor
will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
9. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the
City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the
date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such
failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond
the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written
notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure
the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to
which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
10. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers,
agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
2
R:~naintain\workorders~Vlonteleone Annual agorot
persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in
performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
11. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or
employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office ?orm number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers am to be covered
as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the
Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the
3
R:~rnaintaimworkorders\Monteleone Annual agrmt
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the
Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced
in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior whtten notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by
the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an
alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
g. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every
employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract."
12. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the
City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any
of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's
officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or
agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability
whatever against City, or bind the City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor
in connection with the perfo.rmance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in
the Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing
sen'ices hereunder for the City. The City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
14. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contracto[ shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the
performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section.
4
R 5maintain\workordersWlonteleone Annual agnnt
15. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of
conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the
execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent
examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by the
City for purposes of letting this Contract out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or
omission on the pan of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such
reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
16. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work contemplated by this
Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons
employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that
there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to
be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as
may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and
audit by any authorized representative of the City.
18. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating
utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER.~- Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate
regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215.
20. INSPECTION. The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by the City and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including
without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable
facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be
performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made
within a reasonable time after completion of the Work.
21. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age,
or handicap.
22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a
reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that
party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
P O Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
R:~naintain\workorders~Vlonteleone Annual agnm
To Contractor:
Monteleone Contractors, Inc.
39059 Camino Hermosa
Murrieta, California 92563
(909) 696-7004
23. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor
any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City of Temecula:
24. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full
force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this
Agreement.
25. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall gnvem the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement
and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take
place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the
event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
26. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or
ora local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during
his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer
or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or
otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and
that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of
all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be
considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 )commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing
with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the
parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous
agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement
and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the
representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such
party deems material.
28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or pemons executing
this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this
Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its
obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
6
R:~maintain\workorders~vlonteleone Annual agrmt
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Monteleone Contractors, Inc.
39059 CAMINO HERMOSA
Mumeta, CA 92563
(909) 696-7004
By:.
Ryan Monteleone
7
R:~naintain\workorders~Vlonteleone Annual agrmt
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
CITYWIDE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
Contractor recognizes' that the Contract for Annual Construction Contract for Citywide Routine Maintenance
is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship for the future repair, improvement, maintenance
and/or construction of City of Temecula real and personal property. Contractor agrees that, from time to time,
and on a non-written work assignments("O ffer"), the written work assignment/Offers will include a detailed
scope of work, plans and specifications for the scope of work and the time(s) for performance. The
Contractor shall either accept the Offer or reject it within five (5) business days after the date the City
dispatches the Offer to Contractor.
8
R:~maintain\workordem~Monteleone Annual agrmt
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
9
R:~main~ain\workor ders~Vlonteleo ne Annual agrmt
INC.
CALIFORNIA 02563 · (909) 696-7004 · FAX (909) 696-1835
Time iud equipmeut rate rot 2001 -
Equipment Rite per hrhturdsy/+ 8hru Holiduy/Sunduy
resuhlr rate *per hour overtime ovedlme rute
4S0 dozer SI00.00 SIIS.S0 $131.00
D6LGP $130.00 $14S,S0 S161.00
D6H SJ IS.00 $1~0~0 S]4~.00
834 dozer Sl?0.00 S18S.~0 S201.00
824 dozer S160.00 SI?S.~0 $181.00
DSk dozer S140.00 SISS.S0 S171.00
DSN dozer $140.00 SISS.S0 SI 71.00
DSR dozer SIS0.00 SI6S.S0 S181.00
D9L dozer 5190.00 S20S.~0 S221.00
6S0 immure S280.00 S299.S0 S311.00
· )0 ex~vutor S183.00 Sl98.S0 S214.00
300 exesvttor S1S0.00 SI6S.S0 S181.00
220 er~tvttor s12s.oo Sl~O. SO SlS6.oo
446 bedlhoe SI010 $116.S0 S132.00
~0Mrskip;mower S'~.:!.SO s93.oo SlOB.SO
4S0 C Jomler $1~5.00 S16030 SI?6.00
9S0 Iotder Sl~0.00 SI4S.S0 $161.00
9';7 louder S130.00 SI4S.S0 $161.00
~3 tra~ )older S140.00 $155.S0 SI 71.00
H3 trial; louder S130.00 S145.~ SI61.00
]2 G me,or graderSILO.00 SI2S.S0 S141.00
623 scraper SIS0.00 SI6S. S0 S181.00
860 seraper $140.00 SISS.S0 S171.00
6S? push pub S240.00 $2SS. S0 S271.00
63? E push puU S200.00 S21S.~0 S231.00
10 wheel d ump/pup 580.00 $95.~0 Sl 11.00
Hi-dale semi SSS.00 S]00~0 S116.00
4,000 801w/truck S?S.00 S90.S0 SI06.00
Lowb~d truck S90.00 S10S.S0 $121.00
Fortune $63.00 $78.S0 S94.00
Pick.up S30.00 ~ S4S.S0 S~I.00
Gride eheeker SSI.00 S66.S0 S82.00
L~borer S43.00 S58.50 $74.00
*Note- Overtime wages begin miter 3:00P. M. with 1 6:30 A.M, starting time.
Rite used beyond 8 hout~ on weekdays sad all houri on Saturday.
Ryan MonteJeone Cell (909) 538-6537
Of~ee (909) 696-7004
RECEIVED
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
35245 BRIGGS · MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA 92563 · (909) 677-6403
Time and equipment rate for 2001 -
(909)
ENGINEEF :ITMENT
Equipment Rate per hr Saturday/+ 8hrs Holiday/Sunday
regular rate *per hour overtime overtime rate
450 dozer $100.00 $115.50 $131.00
D6LGP $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
D6H $115.00 $130.50 $146.00
834 dozer $170.00 $185.50 $201.00
824 dozer $160.00 $175.50 $181.00
D8k dozer $140.00 $155.50 $171.00
DSN dozer $140.00 $155.50 $171.00
D8R dozer $150.00 $165.50 $181.00
D9L dozer $190.00 $205.50 $221.00
650 komatsu $280.00 $295.50 $311.00
400 excavator $183.00 $198.50 $214.00
300 excavator $150.00 $165.50 $181.00
220 excavator $125.00 $140.50 $156.00
446 backhoe $1010 $116.50 $132.00
30 Mf skip/mower $77.50 $93.00 $108.50
450 C loader $145.00 $160.50 $176.00
950 loader $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
977 loader $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
973 track loader $140.00 $155.50 $171.00
963 track loader $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
12 G motor grader $110.00 $125.50 $141.00
623 scraper $150.00 $165.50 $181.00
860 scraper $140.00 $155.50 $171.00
657 push pull $240.00 $255.50 $271.00
637 E push pull $200.00 $215.50 $231.00
10 wheel dump/pup $80.00 $95.50 $111.00
Hi-side semi $85.00 $100.50 $116.00
4,000 gal w/truck $75.00 $90.50 $106.00
Lowbed truck $90.00 $105.50 $121.00
Foreman $63.00 $78.50 $94.00
Pick-up $30.00 $45.50 $61.00
Grade checker $51.00 $66.50 $82.00
Laborer $43.00 $58.50 $74.00
*Note- Overtime wages begin after 3:00P.M. with a 6:30 A.M. starting time.
Rate used beyond 8 hours on weekdays and all hours on Saturday.
Ryan Monteleone Ce11(909) 538-6537 Office(909) 696-7004 Pager (909) 694-7028
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
35245 BRIGGS · MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA 92563 · (909) 677-6403 (909) 626-3337 FAX (909) 926-1988
Time and equipment rate for 2001 -
Equipment Rate per hr Saturday/+ 8hfs Holiday/Sunday
regular rate *per hour overtime overtime rate
450 dozer $100.00 $115.50 $131.00
D6LGP $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
D6H $115.00 $130.50 $146.00
834 dozer $170.00 $185.50 $201.00
824 dozer $160.00 $175.50 $181.00
D8k dozer $140.00 $155.50 $171.00
D8N dozer $140.00 $155.50 $171.00
~8R dozer $150.00 $165.50 $181.00
9L dozer $190.00 $205.50 $22L00
650 komatsu $280.00 $295.50 $31L00
400 excavator $183.00 $198.50 $214.00
300 excavator $150.00 $165.50 $181.00
220 excavator $125.00 $140.50 $156.00
446 backhoe $1010 $116.50 $132.00
30 Mfskip/mower $77.50 $93.00 $108.50
450 C loader $145.00 $160.50 $176.00
950 loader $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
977 loader $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
973 track loader $140.00 $155.50 $171.00
963 track loader $130.00 $145.50 $161.00
12 G motor grader $110.00 $125.50 $141.00
623 scraper $150.00 $165.50 $1~i.00
860 scraper $140.00 $155.50 $1'~1.00
657 push pull $240.00 $255.50 $27t.00
637 E push pull $200.00 $215.50 $231.00
10 wheel dump/pup $80.00 $95.50 $111.00
Hi-side semi $85.00 $100.50 $116.00
4,000 gal w/truck $75.00 $90.50 $106.00
Lowbed truck $90.00 $105.50 $121.00
Foreman $63.00 $78.50 $94.00
Pick-up $30.00 $45.50 $61.00
Grade checker $51.00 $66.50 $82.00
Laborer $43.00 $58.50 $74.00
*Note- Overtime wages begin after 3:00P.M. with a 6:30 A.M. starting time.
Rate used beyond 8 hours on weekdays and all hours on Saturday.
Ryan Monteleone Cell(909) 538-6537 Office(909) 696-7004 Pager (909) 694-7028
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION
ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR
CITYWIDE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, made and entered into as of November 28, 2000
by and between the City of Temecula, and Walter K. Becket, (dba Becker Engineering). ("Contractor"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor recognizes' that the Contract for Annual Construction
Contract for Citywide Routine Maintenance is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship for the
futura repair, improvement, maintenance and/or construction of City of Temecula real and personal property.
Contractor agrees that, from time to time, and on a non-written work assignments ("Offer"), the written work
assignment/Offers will include a detailed scope of work, plans and specifications for the scope of work and
the time(s) for performance. The Contractor shall either accept the Offer or reject it within five (5) business
days after the date the City dispatches the Offer to Contractor.
2. COST OF WORK. For the Work described in Section 1. of this Agreement Contractor
shall receive the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($100,000.00) payable in
accordance with the Schedule of Payments, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. This
amount, One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents, shall not exceed the attached scope of work unless
additional payment is approved as provided by this Agreement.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of
this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth heroin, unless such additional services are authorized
in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in
the amounts and in the manner as agreed by the City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written
authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services.
3. PAYMENT. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-
disputed fees. If the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30
days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
4. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best
of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a
minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Contractor
shall cause a full time experienced Superintendent to be present on the site during all construction and to
oversee and supervise the Work.
5. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and
the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance.
RSmaintain\workorders\Becker Annual agrmt
6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 2.,
above, Contractor shall submit to the City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this
contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against the
City under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment.
Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for
payment.
7. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the
general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman
needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are
on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor
shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, ! 776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and
1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the
District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or
mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by
him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
8. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay
to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work
performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor
will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
9. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the
City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the
date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such
failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out &causes beyond
the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written
notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure
the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to
which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
10. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers,
agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
2
R:Xmaintain\workordersXBecker Annual agnnt
persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in
performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
11. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or
employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commemial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code I (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of Califomia and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insumds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the
Contractor; promises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the
3
R:Wnaintain\workorde~s~Becker Annual agrmt
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the
Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced
in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability oflnsumrs. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall fumish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements am to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by
the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an
alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
g. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every
employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract."
12. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the
City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any
of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's
officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or
agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability
whatever against City, or bind the City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor
in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in
the Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing
services hereunder for the City. The City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
14. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the
performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section.
4
R:Lmaintain\workorders~B ecker Annual agnnt
15. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of
conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the
execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent
examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by the
City for purposes of letting this Contract out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or
omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such
reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
16. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work contemplated by this
Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons
employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that
there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to
be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as
may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and
audit by any authorized representative of the City.
18. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating
utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate
regional notification center in accordance with Govemment Code Section 4215.
20. INSPECTION. The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by the City and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including
without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable
facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be
performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made
within a reasonable time after completion of the Work.
21. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis &race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age,
or handicap.
22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a
reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that
party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
P O Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
R:~naintain\workorders~Becker Annual agrmt
To Contractor:
Walter K. Becker, (dba Becker Engineering)
P.O. Box 890365
Temecula, California 92589-0365
(909) 731-3991
23. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor
any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City of Temecula.
24. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full
fome and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this
Agreement.
25. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement
and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take
place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the
event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
26. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or
of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during
his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer
or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or
otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and
that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of
all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be
considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 )commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing
with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the
parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous
agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement
and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the
representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such
party deems material.
28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing
this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this
Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its
obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
R:Xmaintain\workorders~Beckcr Annual agrmt
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Walter K. Becker (dba Becker Engineering)
P.O. BOX 890365
Temecula, CA 92589-0365
(909) 731-3991
By:
Walter K. Becker, Owner
R:~naintain\workorders~Becker Annual ag'ant
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
CITYWIDE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
Contractor recognizes' that the Contract for Annual Construction Contract for Citywide Routine Maintenance
is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship for the future repair, improvement, maintenance
and/or construction of City of Temecula real and personal property. Contractor agrees that, from time to time,
and on a non-written work assignments ("Offer"), the written work assignment/Offers will include a detailed
scope of work, plans and specifications for the scope of work and the time(s) for performance. The
Contractor shall either accept the Offer or reject it within five (5) business days after the date the City
dispatches the Offer to Contractor.
R:Xmaintain\workorders~Becker Annual agrmt
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
R:~raaintain\workorders~Beckcr Annual agrmt
CA License # 683396-A P.O. Box 890365 · Temecula, CA 92589-0365
(909) 731-3991
GRADING o PAVING ° CONCRETE o DEMOLITIONS
PROPOSAL & CONTRA
LABOR RATES
SUPERINTENDENT W/3/4 TON TRUCK
FOREMAN W/1 TON TRUCK
GENERAL LABORER
NOTE:
S.T. O.T.
$58.50 $88.00 P.H.
$54.00 $79.50 "
$44.50 $64.50 "
THESE PRICES REFLECT RECENT CHANGES IN P.W.SCALE.
450 DOZER
SKIPLOADER
310 BACKHOE
763 BOBCAT
763 BOBCAT W/BREAKER
863 BOBCAT
863 BOBCAT W/BREAKER
BOBTAIL DUMP
lto3 TON ROLLER
3to5 TON ROLLER
VIBRATORY PLATE
WACKER TAMP
WATER TRUCK
BARE EQUIPMENT
AREA MOVE INS AT $80.00 P.H.
$50.00 P.H.
$38.50 "
$50.00 "
$42.50 "
$65.50 "
$50.00 "
$73.00 "
$50.00 "
$26.00 "
$38.50 "
$21.00 "
$21.00 "
$55.00 "
ALL OTHER RATES WILL BE COMPUTED AT A-P.W.STANDARDS.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION
ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR
CITYWIDE WEED SPRAYING, ABATEMENT & LITTER REMOVAL
THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, made and entered into as of November 28, 2000
by and between the City of Temecula, and Rene's Commercial Management. ("Contractor"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor recognizes' that the Contract for Annual Construction
Contract for Citywide Routine Maintenance is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship for the
futura repair, improvement, maintenance and/or construction of City of Temecula real and personal property.
Contractor agrees that, from time to time, and on a non-written work assignments ("Offer"), the written work
assignment/Offers will include a detailed scope of work, plans and specifications for the scope of work and
the time(s) for performance. The Contractor shall either accept the Offer or reject it within five (5) business
days after the date the City dispatches the Offer to Contractor.
2. COST OF WORK. For the Work described in Section 1. of this Agreement Contractor
shall receive the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($100,000.00) payable in
accordance with the Schedule of Payments, attached hereto and incorporated heroin as Exhibit A. This
amount, One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents, shall not exceed the attached scope of work unless
additional payment is approved as provided by this Agreement.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of
this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized
in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in
the amounts and in the manner as agreed by the City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written
authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services.
3. PAYMENT. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-
disputed fees. If the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30
days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
4. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best
of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a
minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar
services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Contractor
shall cause a full time experienced Superintendent to be present on the site during all construction and to
oversee and supervise the Work.
5. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and
the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance.
R:Xmaintain\workordersLRe he's Annual agrmt
6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making/'mai request for payment under Paragraph 2.,
above, Contractor shall submit to the City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this
contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against the
City under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment.
Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for
payment.
7. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the
general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman
needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are
on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor
shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and
1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the
District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or
mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by
him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
8. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE,
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior
written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this
Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this
Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay
to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work
performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor
will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
9. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the
City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the
date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such
failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond
the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written
notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure
the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to
which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
10. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers,
agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
2
R:~maintain\workordcrs~Rene's Annual agrml
persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in
performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
sole negligence of the City.
11. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or
employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2)
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employers Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention s. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies
are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(l)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insumds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the
Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the
3
R:~rnainmin\workorders\Rene's Annual agrmt
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the
Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the
City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
.coverage shall .not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced
tn coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by
the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an
.alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
~nsurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
g. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every
employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract."
12. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the
City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any
of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's
officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or
agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability
whatever against City, or bind the City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor
in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in
the Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing
services hereunder for the City. The City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
14. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the
performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply
with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in
equity, occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section.
R:~maintain\workorders'aRcne's Annual agrmt
15. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of
conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the
execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent
examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by the
City for purposes of letting this Contract out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or
omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such
reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
16. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work contemplated by this
Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons
employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that
there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to
be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as
may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and
audit by any authorized representative of the City.
18. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating
utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate
regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215.
20. INSPECTION. The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by the City and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including
without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable
facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be
performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made
within a reasonable time after completion of the Work.
21. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age,
or handicap.
22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a
reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt
showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that
party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
P O Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
R:~naintain\workorders~Rene's Annual aglmt
To Contractor:
Rene's Commercial Management
1002 Luna Way
San Jacinto, California 92583
(909) 487-0247
23. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor
any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior whtten consent of the City of Temecula.
24. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full
force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this
Agreement.
, 25. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement
and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take
place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the
event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
26. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or
ora local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during
his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer
or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or
otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and
that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of
all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be
considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 )commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing
with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the
parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous
agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement
and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the
representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such
party deems material.
28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing
this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this
Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its
obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
R:\maintain\workordem'xRene's Annual agrmt
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Rene's Commercial Management
1002 Luna Way
San Jacinto, CA 92583
(909) 487-0247
By:.
Rene Martinez, Owner
R:~maintain\workorders'~ene's Annual agnm
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
CITYWIDE WEED SPRAYING, ABATEMENT & LITTER REMOVAL
Contractor recognizes' that the Contract for Annual Construction Contract for Citywide Routine Maintenance
is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship for the future repair, improvement, maintenance
and/or construction of City of Temecula real and personal property. Contractor agrees that, from time to time,
and on a non-written work assignments ("Offer"), the written work assignment/Offers will include a detailed
scope of work, plans and specifications for the scope of work and the time(s) for performance. The
Contractor shall either accept the Offer or reject it within five (5) business days after the date the City
dispatches the Offer to Contractor.
R:h'naint ain\work orders~Rene ' s Annual agrmt
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
R:~aaintain\workorders~Rene's Annual agrmt
Rene? . C0mmercial anagement
1002'Lima ,Way * San Jar, into, CA. 92,q83
Tel. 1909) 4870247 * Fnx (90~).:487.~.-.0~79
CLIF~NT:-
City ot~Temecula, CA ~... DATE:.. Oct: .I0, 2000:.
TRACTOR j. MOWING:
Man / Equip.:'
(Rate; includes transportation cost.)
(Minimum 2 lla'$.)
All of these rates, reflect current Prevailing Wage and Certified payr°H:
Rene Martinez -Cellular Phone: 830-0239 Pager: 601-3298
Rene Marfinez - Cellular Phone: 830-0239
Pager: 601-3298
ITEM 7
APPROVAL ~./'-)
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOROFFINANCE~
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 2000
Pumhase of a Portable Self Contained Vacuum Catch Basin Cleaner for the
Public Works Maintenance Division
~ Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
PREPARED
BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of a Portable Self
Contained Vacuum Catch Basin Cleaner in the amount of $48,847.43 from Ditch Witch of Southern
California.
BACKGROUND: On November 2, 2000 the City mailed Requests For Proposars (RFP)
to three (3) vendors for the purchase of a Portable Self Contained Vacuum Catch Basin Cleaner
(see attached vendor list). On November 9, 2000 two (2) proposals were received for the purchase
of this equipment.
The two (2) bids received are as follows:
1. Ditch Witch of Southern California
$48,847.43
2. Vac-Tron Equipment, Okahumpka, FIordia
$51,240.56
The purchase of this vacuum equipment is for the removal of debris from approximately 1,500
Citywide catch basins. Other features include "jetting" of debris in clogged strom drains to allow
both nuisance and storm water run-off to flow without water backing up onto City streets.
Ditch Witch of Southern California has met all required specifications and is located in the City of
Corona making for more reliable equipment service accessibility.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the Public Works Maintenance
Division Equipment Account No. 001-164-601-5610.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Equipment Description
2. Vendor List
1
r:~agd rpt~2000\1128\maint equip purchase/ajp
Trailer mounted
and r~dy to
roll or ~Aid
mounted for
use on your
truck or trailer,
/
· COMP ARE!
is 10 times bigger
our DIRT BARRIER~M Filtration
over 20 square feet of filtration media.
Quickest and easiest tank in the business. High tilt
action combines with VAC-TRON's SUPERSLICKTM Tank
Liner for quick, clean and complete dump out.
Our MEGA-MOUTHTM Rear
Door opens to a full
48 inches in diameter.
You save time and money.
lpPatented
EED-SPIN~
arch Release
allows tank
dump door
to be opened
in 15 seconds!
PROTECTOR~M engine enclosure designed to protect
the engine, vacuum pump and high pressure water pump. Protects
vital parts from weather and debris. Protects operators from harm.
DURAFLEX~M Hose is
lightweight and easy to use but
industrial tough. Plus with a
VAC-TRON system you get a
variety of hose attachments for
different applications.
~. v.c~um ~c~;- U,.~m~o..d EU.~.~e~ . ~m~ unes . c~.,.s ~:;~; .. ~',,~,', wet
f;~" · Utilities D~ ~ee ~ Frae-Outs · Into Conduit · Meter Boxe~ · Or Dr~ Material
Feature for feature, cubic foot for cubic foot, no other
brand of industrial vacuum equipment on the market
today can match the advantages of a VAC-TRON.
Iorla Class Vacuu Eqw ent
VAC- TRON ADVANTAGES
· POWER TOWER~M "Big Red" Bag House superior dirt filtration
system to protect vacuum pump
· MEGA-MOUTH~M full open rear door for complete unloading
· SPEED-SPINTM quick and easy dump door release
· SUPERSLICKTM tank liner for easier and faster dump out
· TOUGH-TRONTM super seal four coat paint process for durability
A ~a~uum system that's tenatile, easy to
operate, and tough enough for any job.
That's what you want. That's what we make.
Call For More Information And A Dealer Near You
1.B88.VAC.TROK
www. vactron.com
VENDOR LIST
PORTABLE VACUUM
VAC TRON EQUIPMENT
27137 S. HWY 33
OKAHUMPKA, FL 34762
(888) 822-8766
FAX (352) 728-2850
DITCH WITCH
1201 E. 6TM STREET
CORONA, CA 92879
(909) 735-7510
FAX (909) 735-8480
GLOBAL MACHINERY INT'L WEST
801 NORTHPORT DRIVE #5
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691
(916) 712-1265
FAX (916) 428-7975
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
-- -- APPROVAL
ClTY ATTORNEY -~_.~.~_
DIRECTOR OFFINANC~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 2000
Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Temecula's Electric Light Parade
on December 1,2000, and Delegate Authority to issue Special Events/Street
Closures Permit to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES
FOR JEFFERSON AVENUE AND ABUTTING STREETS FROM
DEL RIO ROAD TO OVERLAND AVENUE FOR TEMECULA'S
ELECTRIC LIGHT PARADE ON DECEMBER 1, 2000, AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY
ENGINEER TO ISSUE A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING
STREET CLOSURES.
BACKGROUND: The former annual city-sponsored "Santa's Electric Lights Parade"
has been renamed to "Temecula's Electric Light Parade". This event necessitates temporary street
closures to protect the participants. The subject special event requires the closure of a portion of a
major City highway and the streets abutting this highway for a period of several hours on December
1, 2000.
Under Vehicle Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways
under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other
instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events,
and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during
the temporary closing".
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards
and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public rights-of-way.
This resolution set forth processes for staff reviewing applications, denying approval or approving
subject to conditions including events requiring changes in normal traffic patterns, and an appeal
1
r:\agdrpt~000\1128\Temecula Electric Light Parade
process to the City Manager. However the resolution did not delegate authority to temporarily close
streets for these special events.
The subject resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the
Temecula Community Services Department sponsored "Temecula Electric Light Parade" to the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. All other special events requiring temporary street closures,
construction-related closures, etc, shall remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to
rules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall also be
adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101.
This year's event parade route will include the Ovedand Drive bridge and will require closure at the
Ynez Road intersection. The period of closure would begin at 6:00pm and the roadway would re-
open shortly after the parade is over with the signal timing re-established. This would minimize
traffic effects.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of police services, and for provision, placement, and retrieval of
necessary warning and advisory devices by the City Maintenance Department, are included in
budgetary items.
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. 2000-
Parade Route
Special Event Permit Application
Special Event Permit No. LD00-016SE
2
r:\agdrpt~2000\1128\Temecu[a Electdc Light Parade
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES
FOR JEFFERSON AVENUE AND ABUTTING STREETS FROM
DEL RIO RD TO OVERLAND AVENUE FOR TEMECULA'S
ELECTRIC LIGHT PARADE ON DECEMBER 1, 2000, AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY
ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING
STREET CLOSURES.
THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The California State Vehicle Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula sponsors the annual "Temecula's Electric Light Parade",
for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or
proposing to use that street or streets for the special event; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily
close public streets for this annual "Temecula's Electric Light Parade" on December 1,2000; and
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to approve temporary street closures for the annual "Temecula's Electric Light Parade",
and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed
and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the
annual "Temecula's Electric Light Parade" on December 1,2000, and affirms the general rule that
all other temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 28th day of November, 2000.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
3
r:~agdrpt~000\1128\Temecula Electdc Light Parade
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of November, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
4
r:~agdrpt~2000\1128\Temecula Electric Light Parade
't'
CiTY OF TEMECULA
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION
TO BE HELD ON PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS,
SIDEWALKS, OR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
APPLICANT'S NAME AND ADDRESS:
CI~i' OF 't'P~ECq]LA, COt~M~I~/ SgT, VICES DEPA_R~:N~
8u , ss
NUMBER OF3A. I T IP]pA I i {} ANT b.000 S ECTA OIL
PURPOSE OF EVENT:
T]~I]~COIAtS ELECTglC LIGHT
DATE, HOURS. PRECISE LOCATION OF EVENT:
FRT11A¥_ TII;:.~.FJ4"RKR 1. 2000 L~"L;"N~'
Bo
FEES TO BE CHARGED BY PERMITTEE:
TYPE & NATURE OF VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT. ETC.:
PARAllR VI,:H
SOUND SYSTEMS - NUMBER AND AMPLIFICATION RANGE:
8O
TYPE OF GOODS;SERVICES TO BE SOLD/PROVIDED:
NO I/I~NllOI~R SPJ.I.TNG TTKIqR DURINC OR AT PARAIIF.
90 VENDORS/NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS:
100 SECURITY PLAN FOR EVENT:
THE APPLICANT HEREBY STATES THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS ACCURATE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. THE
APPUCANT AGREES TO FULLY COMPENSATE THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR ANY DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY, AS WELL AS
TO CLEAN AND OTHERWISE RESTORE THE EVENT SITE TO THE CONDITION IN WHICH~I' EXISTED PRIOR TO THE CONDUCT OF
DAPPLICANT/AG'~N~ SIGNATURE DATE
PRINT APPLICANT/AGENT NAME
FOR CITY STAFF USE ONLY:
1. APPLICATION FEE AMOUNT: $ PAID:
2. SPECLAL EVENT []
3. MAJOR SPECLAL EVENT r'l
4. MEET/CONFER WITH TRANSPORTATION DIVISION []
5. INSURANCE CERTXFICATE REQUIRED []
6. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIRED []
p wO l\forma~perm,t s~$oecevnt.~op 092091
Permit Number: LD00-016SE
PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT
City of Temecula 9o9) 9o9)6 . 7
jo,03A(~c~,~, s Park Drive = Tem~ula, CalE~nia 92590 · Mailing Addr~s: P.O. Box ~33 = Tem~ula, Calif~nia 9258~9033
Location: JEFFE~ON AVE FROM DEL RIO TO O~RLA~
Applied: 11/13/2000
Issued: 11/14/2000
Expired: 05/13/2001
Status: ISSUED
Permit Fee: $0.00
NOTE: PERMIT FEE DOES NOT INCLUDE OTHER
FEES AUTHORIZED BY CITY ORDINANCE
Applicant:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Description: TEMECULA'S ELECTRIC LIGHT PARADE DECEMBER 1, 2000
SPONSORED BY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT. PARADE ROUTE IS ON
JEFFERSON A.V~,.I~,',M:DE~ ~RIO RD TO OVERLAND DR. STREET CLOSURES BE ,G,.,I?I .......
: ,".: % % ",~': . ..... :'~ i;~'~ '~'~:!_:!.Z '_:~
AT APPR'O~-~,~'"PM. PARADE BEGINS AT. 7,30 PM.ON.DECEMBER:l,----7-- . ....
2000~:SEGUR_IT~;R~ I?ER CITY'POLICE DEPARTMENI'. STREET CLOSURE IS
AUTHORIZED BY: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_.
THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED PROVISIONS
BEFORE YOU DIG - CALL (TOLL FREE) 800-422-4133 . .'
......... =_-'= ...................................................... -_' =~-=':- .....
PenmSsion is hereby requested to encroach nto public right of way to perform work as set forth above. It is understood that
this permit is limited to the work described herein and that all work is to be done in compliance with the provisions attached
to this permit and with all other applicable rules, responsibility for said compliance, for acceptability of the work,'and for
repair or replacement thereof if defective, and for repair or replacement of any existing improvement damaged by the doing
of the work.
.~ -. L:: .'
1 hereby certify and-agree that all Ordinances of the City of Temecula and the State of California will be complied with
whether herein stated or no~"-2~'.'- ,.
Permittee:s SignatUr~!?~/~_~//J--
C(~d Engineer ~;~,~uth~d Representative
Date
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY '~2~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
/~¢~Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 2000
Trees for the Millennium Grant Application for FY 2000-2001
PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Receive and file this report regarding our Trees for the Millennium Grant Application for
the planting of street trees within the Winchester Creek Development and authorize the
Director of Public Works to forward said application to the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection.
2. Approve a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION
FOR THE URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM AS
PROVIDED THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA TREES FOR THE
MILLENNIUM INITIATIVE FUNDED THROUGH THE FOREST
RESOURCE IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE WINCHESTER
CREEK DEVELOPMENT
BACKGROUND: Governor Gray Davis' office has announced a new grant initiative
to assist cities, counties, districts and other divisions of local government as well as non-profit
organizations in the application of the new "Trees for the Millennium" grant program for fiscal
year 2000-2001. Administered by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the
new initiative will make available approximately $3.1 million on a State-wide basis (up to
$50,000 per jurisdiction) in supplemental funds to assist local programs that recognize, promote
and sustain the importance of maintaining the urban forest. An "urban forest" would include all
of the treed areas in and around the City, including street and yard trees, as well as trees in
parks and natural open space areas.
I
R:~agdrpt~2000\1128\Treesforthemillen nium.grantapp
The City of Temecula recognizes that properly selected and maintained street trees provide
many benefits to a community including shade and heat dissipation, environmental
enhancement, and aesthetic improvements. As a result, the City recently embarked on a
demonstration program called "Trees for Temecula", which provides for the replacement of
missing or damaged street trees in specific residential neighborhoods within the City right-of-
way areas. The areas first targeted under this program were the Rainbow Canyon and Starlight
Ridge developments. The program also included a community outreach phase by which each
resident proposed for tree planting was provided with a picture of the tree and asked for their
concurrence in planting the tree. Upon completion of the planting project, over 60% of the
residents have responded favorably to the program, and several hundred missing street trees
were replaced within these neighborhoods. The new trees have been included in the City's tree
trimming program.
To further promote the Trees for Temecula program, the Public Works Department has
prepared a grant application request that we believe also meets the goals and objectives of the
State's "Trees for the Millennium" funding program. Under this application, Public Works
proposes to replace over 769 missing or removed street trees within the target area of the
Winchester Creek development. Our application seeks $50,000.00 in Trees for the Millennium
funds to help to offset a portion of the City's cost of replanting trees within this development.
FISCAL IMPACT: The approximate cost to replace each missing street tree is
$95.00. If our application is successful, the Trees for the Millennium program would reimburse
the City up to $65.00 per tree planted, or approximately 68% of the overall cost of replacing
trees within the Winchester Creek Development. For example, if all 769 missing trees in
Winchester Creek were replaced, the total cost of the project would be approximately
$73,055.00. In this instance, the City would be eligible to receive a reimbursement of
$50,000.00 from the Trees for the Millennium program. Said funds would not only offset the
overall cost of replacing trees in the target area, but also allow for additional tree maintenance
services elsewhere in the community. Adequate funds are available in the Public Works
Maintenance Division, Routine Street Maintenance Account No. 001-164-601-5402 for Fiscal
Year 2000-2001.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 2000-
Map of Winchester Creek.
2
R:\agdrpt~2000\1128\Treesforthemillen nium.grantapp
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION
FOR THE URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM AS
PROVIDED THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA TREES FOR THE
MILLENNIUM INITIATIVE FUNDED THROUGH THE FOREST
RESOURCE IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE WINCHESTER
CREEK .DEVELOPMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California in cooperation with California State
Legislature has enacted the California Trees for the Millennium Initiative for 1999, which provides
funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for urban forestry programs; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has been delegated
the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary
procedures governing application by local agencies and non-profit organizations under the
program, and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application before
submission of said application to the State; and
WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California to
carry out a tree-planting project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the filing of
an application for the "TREES FOR THE MILLENNIUM" tree planting grant program for the
Winchester Creek development; and
Section 2. The City Council hereby certifies that sufficient funds are available to
operate and maintain the project; and
Section 3.
project, and
Section 4.
to March 1, 2003, and
The City Council hereby certifies that funds are available to begin the
The City Council hereby certifies that grant funds will be expended prior
Section 5. The City Council hereby appoints William G. Hughes, Director of Public
Works/City Engineer, to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit ail documents including,
but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which
may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.
3
R:~agdrpt~000\1128\Treesforthemillennium.gra ntapp
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 28th day of November 2000.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do
hereby certify that Reso ut on No. 2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular me(~ting thereof held on the 28 h day of November, 2000, by
the following vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
4
R:\agdrpt~2000\l 128\Treesforthemillenniu m.granta pp
/
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY "~'z),~.~.~
DIRECTOR OF FINAN-'~ /~-~
CITY MANAGER ~../"J,~'~
/v
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManageflCity Council
'J, lj~..William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 2000
Second Amendment to Agreement with Davidson + Allen Architects
City Maintenance Facility Modifications - Phase III, Project No. PW00-16
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Consultant
Services Agreement between the City and Davidson & Allen Architects, increasing the contract
amount by $ 9,549.02.
BACKGROUND: On May 25, 1999 the City Council approved an agreement with Davidson +
Allen Architects in the amount of $31,875.00. to provide architectural and structural design services
for Phase III of the Maintenance Facility Modifications. The first amendment to this agreement
increasing the contract total by $5,100.00, for various changes to their scope of work, was approved
by Council on August 10, 1999.
Reimbursable expenses related to amendment number one exceeded the amount included in that
amendment, therefore an additional $971.27 will be included in this amendment to cover those
unforeseen costs.
Davidson and Allen's structural engineer performed additional structural analysis and design to
accommodate the relocation of the proposed elevator, the charges total $4,577.75.
The recently adopted space plan identified the need to add additional private office spaces and a
conference room to the previously completed phase III plans. Additional structural analysis and
structural details are also required to accommodate the added load from City Clerks proposed
"Space Saver High Density File Storage System." The charges related to this work total $4,000.00.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City Maintenance Facility Modification Project, Project No PW00-16, is
funded by Capitol Project Reserves. Adequate funds are available in account number 210-190-
158-5802 for this contract amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Original Agreement
2. Amendment No. 1
3. Amendment No. 2
1
r:~agdrpt~000\l 128\pw00-16\Davidsor~Allenamend02
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA
AND
DAVIDSON + ALLEN, ARCHITECTS
MAINTENANCE FACILITY MODIFICATIONS
PROJECT NO. PW00-16
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of November 28, 2000 by and
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City" and Davidson + Allen, Architects
("Consultant"). In consideration ofthe mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On May 25, 1999 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement
entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement").
B. The Agreement was amended on August 10, 1999. The Agreement as
amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement".
Amendment.
The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
2. A. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on May 25, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event
later than June 30, 2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the previsions of
this Agreement.
B. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with
the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in
Exhibit "A", Payments Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference as set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed
$46,524.02 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is
approved as provided in this Agreement.
3. Exhibit "A" to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place a
new Exhibit "A" is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
1
R:~CIP~PROJEC TStPWOOIOO-16~DA VIDSON AMEND 2. DOC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Davidson + Allen, Architects
28441 Rancho California Rd, Suite A
Temecula, CA 92590
Dean Davidson,/~c~tec~
2
R:tCIP~.=ROJEC TS~WOO~OO-16~DA VIDSON AMEND 2. DOC
Attachment A
Davidson +Alien, architects
28441 Rancho California Road, Suite "A"
Temecula, CA 92590 ........ (909) 693-0301
November 16, 2000
City of Temecula
Department of Public Works
43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: Greg Butler, PE
RE:
Amendment No. 2 to agreement to provide architectural and engineering services for
Phase III modifications to Temecula Maintenance Facility.
Scope of Work:
Additional Amendment No. 1 reimbursable expenses: $971.27.
Additional structural analysis and design to accommodate the relocation of the proposed elevator:
$4,577.75.
Additional design and amhitectural electrical details to add additional private office spaces and a
conference room to the previously completed phase Ill plans. Additional structural analysis and
structural details to accommodate the added load from City Clerks proposed "Space Saver High
Density File Storage System: $4,000.00.
The above items total $ 9,549.02.
Respectfully submitted~/~.
Dean Davidson
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY
OF TEMECULA AND DAVIDSON + ALLEN ARCHITECTS
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of Auaust 10. 1999 by and
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City" and Davidson + Allen Architects
("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On May 25, 1999 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement
entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services" ("Agreement").
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
2. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
4.a~ "Contractor shall receive the sum of thirty seven thousand two hundred and
sixty five dollars ($37,265.00) payable in accordance with the Scope of Work,
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this A~eement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITYOFT ,~LA
BYe. et J~t~o~ d,~yor~v'
ATTES~I:
BY:~ Su~s~ ~.Jones~Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Davidson + Allen Architects
DAVIDSON +ALLEN, architects
ARCHITECTURE & PL.~q3qING
25,Mt RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD.. SUITE" .¥'. TEMECL~A. CA 92590 ........... (909) 693-0301-FAX (909) 693-4080
May 7, 1999
Mr. Anthony Elmo
Chief Building Official
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Proposal to furnish architectural and engineering services for Phase III
modifications to existing Temecula Maintenance Facility Building.
SCOPE OF WORK
Provide architectural, structural, electrical and mechanical drawings and specifications to
accomplish the following items of work:
· Prepare master plan for future development alternatives to maximize ultimate use
of the facility for office and administration purposes.
· Investigate enlargement of first floor area adjacent to existing entry for immediate
expansion of Building Department space. Investigate location of elevator in this
location. Investigate addition of second floor above this area.
· Prepare working drawings and specifications for addition of second floor over
existing warehouse area for use as office space (approximately 3,000 sq. ft.).
· Prepare working drawings and specifications for additional office space at first
floor external to existing building (approximately 1,000 sq. fi).
· Install new handicapped compliant elevator to second floor.
· Remove existing material lift.
· Work of this phase shall be for the structural shell only but shall include required
structural calculations and details. Modifications required to facilitate future
expansion of mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems as determined by the
design for ultimate build-out shall be included in this phase.
· Office layout and interior improvements shall be included in a subsequent phase of
construction. A separate proposal shall be furnished for this portion of the work.
Page 1 of 3
PAYIVIENT
Payment shall be in accordance with agreement prepared by of City of Temecula.
TIME OF COMPLETION
The work shall be completed and ready for submittal for plan cheek on or before June 22,
1999.
I hope this proposal is acceptable, as we would like ve~ much to have the opportunity of
working with you on this project, ffyou have any questions regarding any part of this
proposal or any related items please feel free to contact me.
¥ours
Dean Davidson
Davidson + Allen Architects
Accepted:
Title:
Date;
Page 3 of 3
CiTY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
MAINTENANCE FACILITY PHASE III
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of May 25, 1999, between the City
of Temecula, a municlnal corporation ("C ty") and Davidson + Allen Architects, ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mu[ual covenants and conditions set fo~h herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on May 25, 1999, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June
30, 1999, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and
schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Thirty One Thousand Eight
Hundred Seventy Five Dollars and no Cents ($31,875.00) for the total term of The Agreement
unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty -five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisButed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSF.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULTOFCONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with wdtten notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon
it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event
that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or
under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be cleady identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data. documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing
the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the
Consultant. With respect to computer flies containing data generated for the work. Consultant shall
make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer
software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer
files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnity, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert
witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may
sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage
to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions adsing out of or in any
way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability
adsing out of the negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injudes to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covedng Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to
the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has
no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4)
Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project, location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $500,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
2 Agreements\Consultant 99
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars (S1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4)
Professional Liability coverage:: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be pdmary insurance as respects the City', its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceotability of Insurers. Insurance is to be ptaced with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
P~Agreements\Consu~ant 99 ~
f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents
are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt. obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSlBILITIE~ The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure
of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior wdtten
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without wdtten
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewme said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail.
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
To Consultant:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Ddve
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
Davidson + Allen Architects
28441 Rancho California Rd. Ste A
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: Dean Davidson
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only Davidson + AIIlen shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Davidson + Allen
may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this
Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of
Assistant from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the City shall
have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said
notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or a's may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief
granted.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, unaerstandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no fur[her force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set for[h herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF
.~...~ven
Attest:
E~CULA
Ford, M~aayor
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Davidson + Allen
By:
Name: Dean Davidson
Title:
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
P~Agreements\Consultan[ 99
DAVIDSON +,aLLEN, architects
ARCHITECTURE & PL.&NNI~G
22441 IL&NCHO CALIFOIL\'IA ROAD.. SL]TE' k' ~.MECULA. CA92590 ............ 909'~ 6934301-FAX (9093693~080
May 7, 1999
.Mr. Anthony Elmo
Chief Building Official
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
5ubjecE
Proposal to furnish architectural and en~mneering services for Phase III
modifications to existing Temecula Maintenance Facility Building.
SCOPE OF WORK
Provide architectural, structural, electrical and mechanical drawings and specifications to
accomplish the following items of work:
· Prepare master plan for future development alternatives to maximize ultimate use
of the facility for office and administration purposes.
· Investigate enlargement of first floor area adjacent to existing entry for immediate
expansion of Building Department space. Investigate location of elevator in this
location. Investigate addition of second floor above this area.
· Prepare working drawings and specifications for addition of second floor over
existing warehouse area for use as office space (approximately 3,000 sq. fr.).
· Prepare working drawings and specifications for additional office space at first
floor external to existing building (approximately 1,000 sq. ff.).
· Install new handicapped compliant elevator to second floor.
· Remove existing material litL
· Work of this phase shall be tbr the structural shell only but shall include required
structural calculations and details. Modifications required to thcilitate future
expansion of mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems as determined by the
design for ultimate build-out shall be included in this phase.
· Office layout and interior improvements shall be included in a subsequent phase of
construction. A separate proposal shall be furnished for this portion of the work.
Page 1 of 3
WORK INCLUDED
· Prepare preliminary designs to show alternate concepts tbr future development.
· Prepare drawings as required to show the scope of the work to be accomplished under
this contract including existing conditions, floor plans, elevations, sections, details,
notes and specifications suitable for obtaining required permits and contractor's bids.
· Prepare structural, mechanical and electrical plans and calculations notes, schedules
and specifications.
· Check shop drawings and material submittals during construction.
· Weekly site visits or job meetings by the Architect during construction.
· A maximum of 2 site visits each by structural, mechanical and electrical consultants
during construction.
WORK EXCLUDED
· Fire sprinkler design modifications (This is normally provided by system contractor as
a part of their work).
· Bidding (available for consultation during bidding as required)
· Contract negotiation with successful bidder.
· Job adm/nistration except as noted above.
COSTS EXCLUDED
· Printing, plotting and reproduction costs (available ~ cost +15%)
· Consultants other than indicated above.
· Application and permit fees
· All construction costs
· Any special inspections
FEE
The tee for the above, services shall be Thirty One Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventy
Five Dollars ($31,875.00)
For work done in addition to the basic contract the following fee schedule shall apply:
Architect .................... $95/hr
Structural Engineer ......... $95/hr.
Electrical/Mechanical Engineer $95/hr.
Computer draining ...... $50/hr
Clerical $40/hr.
Page 2 of 3
PAYMI::NT
Payment shall be in accordance with a~eement prepared by of City of Temecula.
TI2ME OF COMPLETION
The work shall be completed and ready for submittal for plan check on or before June 22.
1999.
[ hope this proposal is acceptable, as we would like very much to have the opportunity of
working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding any part of this
proposal or any related items please feel free to contact me.
Davidson + Allen Architects
Accepted:
Title:
Date:
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULF
FEE
The'fee for the above service shall be Thirty One Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventy Five
Dollars ($31,875.00)
For work done in addition to the basic contract the following fee schedule shall apply:
Architect $951hr
Structural Engineer $95/hr
Electrical/Mechanical Engineer $95/hr
Computer drafting $50/hr
Clerical $40/hr
ITEM 11
APPROVAL --~
CITY ATTORNEY ~
DIRECTOR OFFINANC.,,E.,~..~(~,_
CITY MANAGER ~ '
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
/~j~William G. Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Hughes,
November 28, 2000
Tract Map No. 29286, Finding of conformance with its original approval,
Located on the Southeast corner of Date Street and Margarita Road
PREPARED BY: ~'~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Reza James, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 29286 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3)
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material
Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2000, the City of Temecula City Council approved
Planning Application No. PA00-0300, Tentative Tract 29286, a request to subdivide 11.70 acres of
land into a thirty eight (38) lot single-family residential subdivision. The tract is located on the
southeast corner of Date Street and Margarita Road.
This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final
subdivision map, which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map,
is a mandatory ministerial act under State law.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No.29286:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Tract Map No. 29286
I
r:\agdrpt~000\l 128\tr29286.map
CITY OFTEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
TRACT MAP NO. 29286
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Quimby Fees
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Paid
To be paid prior to issuance of certificate of
Occupancy
2
r:~agdrpt~2000\1128\tr29286.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
MAP NO.29286 DATE: November 28, 2000
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 418,000 $ 209,000
Water $ 87,000 $ 43,500
Sewer $ 92,000 $ 46,000
TOTAL $ 597,000 $ 298,500
Monument $ 7,600
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
* To be paid prior to certificate of occupancy
** To be paid prior to issuance of building permit
$ 0.00
$ **
$ *
$ 139.00
$ 8.00
$ 1,510.00
$ 2,229.00
$ 3,886.00
$ 0.00
3
r:~agdrpt~2000~1128\tr29286.ma p
NO. 29286
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CITY OF
TEMECULA
VICINITY MAP
EXHIBIT A
133~$ 31¥0
0
I
[__
0
Z
ITEM 12
APPROVal _ ~ ~ .~7
CITY A'I-]'ORNEY c'~g2,/"g'~'/~'~1/)
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER.~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
DATE:
November 28, 2000
SUBJECT: Benefit Allotment Change - Effective January 1, 2001
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council approve an increase of the City of Temecula employee
benefit monthly allotment from $496 to $650, effective January 1,2001. This increase is intended to
keep Temecula's benefit package competitive and to offset the ever-rising costs of medical, dental
and vision plan inflation.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) outlines the benefit
allotment amount increases between July 1, 1997 and June 30, 2002. The current monthly allotment
stands at $496 with a $4.00/month increase in July 2001, giving City employees $500/month
allotments, which will take them to the end of the five-year MOU agreement, expiring June 30, 2002.
If approved, this increase would be effective January 1, 2001 and would void the $4.00 increase
scheduled for July 1, 2001, that was included in the current MOU.
CITY OF TEMECULATRENDS
City employees were offered, on a monthly basis, $450 in 1990, $490 in 1991-94, $481 in 1995-96,
and started with $479 in 1997 at the beginning of the five-year MOU. The $479/month has
incrementally increased and will top out at $500/month, effective July 1,2001. Next, this represents
an 8.5% allotment increase in a five-year time span or just a 10% increase since the City's
incorporation. On an average, just during this current MOU, City employees have absorbed:
33% increase in medical premiums
45% increase in dental premiums
29% increase in vision premiums
During the last few years, the City has experienced problems recruiting qualified staff members.
This problem has become even more critical at the professional and technical staff levels. In
addition, the City's most important resource is our employees and the ability to attract highly
qualified employees, while retaining our current staff, is vital to the City's future success.
Finally, this increase places the City in a more competitive position as our benefit package will
become more attractive, which will help keep us competitive. As a way of example, the City of
Murrieta offers a monthly benefit of $637.
NATIONAL TRENDS
In analyzing national healthcare trends over the past ten years, the following benefit trends need to
be recognized.
Healthcare inflation is taking off again. Healthcare costs are currently rising at rates that are two
to three times the basic inflation rate. Healthcare costs raised a total of 7.3% in 1999 and 7.5% in
2000. Nationwide insurance costs began to take off in 1998 - growing 8.2% compared to 2.8%
in 1995, 3.5% in 1996, and 3.5% in 1997. After adjusting for inflation, employees were paying 2.1
times as much for health insurance in 1998 as in 1988.
Pharmaceutical costs are expected to increase an average 15% to 18% annually for the next
five years.
Upward pressure on healthcare premiums. Pressures include: new medical technology, aging of
the population, overuse and misuse of medical services, oversupply of health care facilities, high
administrative costs, and cost shifting. As health insurance companies struggle for financial viability,
they are finally starting to raise premiums, recognizing that they cannot control healthcare costs and
must compensate with higher pricing.
Tight Labor Market. Employers have to make their benefit packages as attractive as possible in
order to attract the best applicants. According to a recent survey by Hewitt Associates, most health
care managers are allocating between 8% and 10% more money for health care cost increases in
2000. These increases follow the approximate 8% increase in 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT: A total of 138.75 authorized positions x $154 = $21,367.50 x6 months is equal to
a fiscal impact of approximately $128,205 (which will not require a budget adjustment) or $256,410
on an annual basis.
Attachment A: Letter Agreement
Attachment A
Letter Agreement
Between the City of Temecula and the
General Employees of the City of Temecula
Article 32
Section 125 Cafeteria Plan
The City agrees to contribute a $650 allotment per month, beginning January 1, 2001 through the
end of this agreement, June 30, 2002. This amended allotment amount will, therefore, void the
$4 increase scheduled for July 1, 2001.
According to the language within the M.O.U., Article 32, this amended allotment must be applied
to all mandatory benefits as determined by the City. The first day of the month following the date
of hire an employee, upon proper application and acceptance, shall be covered under mandatory
benefits as set forth in the contract between the city and the carrier(s). The employee can then
apply the remainder to optional benefits, within Article 32, or take the remainder in cash.
This Letter Agreement is contingent on approval by the Temecula City Council.
For the City:
For the Representatives:
Shawn Nelson
City Manager
Mary Vollmuth
Chief Union Steward
Date
Chester Mordasini
President, Local Teamsters 911
Date
ITEM 13
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 2000
Calle Medusa - Results of Resident Survey
PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Accept the survey results received from residents living on or near Calle Medusa; abandon the
concept of closing this roadway to through traffic; and continue ongoing enforcement of existing
traffic laws in this area.
BACKGROUND: A City Council Sub-Committee recently directed staff to conduct a
survey of residents in the area of Calle Medusa as to their desire to have this roadway closed at
· Au ust 15, 2000, staff mailed survey letters to 607
iverton Lane to through tr.affic .O.n ~ ~,~ usa that could be impacted by the
proved/occupied residential propemes on ur near Ca,,,. Med
cli~osure of this roadway. Of the 607 notices that were mailed, 362 residents responded to the
survey. Eighteen notices were returned by the postal service as undehverable", none of which
were addressed to residents living on Cable Medusa. An analysis of the survey results is
provided for your review, as follows:
Overall Results of Resident Survey.
To-daY# of Notices -- ( )pp:---ose~to _
IT°t Mailed ~c`~d~e'~- ~
~in On Calle Medusa Road
tlces-Mailed t~r°m~~d tu Roa'~ ?,, .etu.m~
No ' Road Closure
N~lle Medusa I C~iMdeedn~sSa IR°ad Cl°sure __
l-~'esidents -I Res~d~ent'~ ~r~ -1 cto~_ "un(:lec,oe~
R:~agdrpt~000\l 128\callemedusasurvey
1
Residents responding to the survey also provided us with a number of comments via the survey
card or by a separate letter. Comments in favor of road closure generally cited the amount of
traffic, excessive speeding, reduced property values and dangers to pedestrians. Those
residents opposed to road closure were concerned that such action would only divert traffic to
other narrower streets, impede access for emergency vehicles and school buses, and otherwise
create a circuitous route for residents that use Calle Medusa to enter and exit their
neighborhoods. Some residents asked the City to consider opening Kahwea and North General
Kearny Road, install speed bumps and more stop signs, and provide increased police patrol in
the evenings.
Since 1991, the City Council, Public/Traffic Safety Commission, and Engineering Staff have
carefully considered the traffic issues on Calle Medusa. These efforts have resulted in the
installation of weight limit signs, all-way stop signs, numerous 25 MPH speed limit signs,
increased police patrol and the consideration of a variety of other traffic solutions such as speed
humps, median islands, roadway narrowing, and alternative roadways. In addition, the City
Council changed the designation of Calle Medusa from a Principal Collector Highway to a "Local
Road", thereby eliminating it from the Circulation Plan. In an effort to further reduce traffic
volumes, the City constructed the Walcott Lane Bypass Corridor in 1997 at a cost of $1.5
million.
However, traffic studies indicate that based on the number of homes that have access to Calle
Medusa, existing traffic volumes do not represent a significant "cut-through" traffic pattern.
Furthermore, the installation of the all-way stop signs has not proven to be an effective method
for controlling traffic speeds or volumes in this area. As recently as December 9, 1999, the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission reviewed a petition signed by 259 residents supporting the
closure of Calle Medusa Road, stating that the all-way "stop" signs failed to achieve the desired
results. The Commission denied the request, citing the lack of justification and resident support
that would warrant such action.
Residents throughout the community offen suggest to staff that the City close their streets to
through traffic as a means of controlling vehicular movement. To this end, staff developed a
Policy for the Closure or Modification of Traffic Flows on Public Streets, which requires, in part,
that road closures not adversely impact adjacent streets. Recently, the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission recommended that Kahwea Road be permanently closed to through traffic. It is
staff's opinion that additional road closures in the area of Calle Medusa would divert traffic and
adversely impact adjacent streets such as Enfield Lane, Riverton Lane, Calle Katerine, and
Klarer Lane. Travel routes for emergency vehicles could be affected as well as travel to and
from local schools in the area.
Additional methods of traffic control include the installation of multi-way stop signs. The
Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that Multi-Way Stop controls are useful at locations where the
volume of traffic on intersecting roads is approximately equal, and/or where a combination of
high speed, restricted sight distance and accident history indicate that assignment of right-of-
way is necessary. Multi-Way "Stop" controls are typically recommended where there is strong
evidence that overall traffic safety can be improved and should not be used solely for controlling
vehicular speeds. By installing signs at unwarranted locations, some drivers tend to become
conditioned to disregard traffic controls such as speed limits, stop signs and signals. Our
experience with the Calle Medusa Multi-Way stop controls supports this conclusion.
R:~agdrpt~000\l 128\callemedusasurvey
2
Similarly, traffic-calming devices were installed on a temporary basis along Via Cordoba as a
method of reducing vehicular speed. The results of the before and after traffic studies indicated
that the temporary traffic circles and medians were ineffective in reducing speed and were later
removed, in addition, the estimated cost to design and construct traffic circles and raised
medians can vary from $10,000 to $40,000 each, depending on the type and location of the
improvements. The modification of existing improvements and long-time maintenance issues
would also increase the cost of such improvements. Currently, there are no funds appropriated
in the City's Capital Improvement Program to construct this type of improvement. It should be
noted that the aforementioned City Policy for closure or modification of traffic flow on public
streets requires the residents to participate in all costs directly associated with street
modification.
insofar as installing speed undulations to reduce vehicular speeds and volumes, to date, the
City's only test location along Calle Pina Colada has been ineffective in significantly reducing
traffic speeds and volumes. In fact, the Calle Pina Colada residents' perception is that the
speed undulations are ineffective and have requested that the City remove the speed
undulations and close the street to through traffic to achieve the desired effect.
Installing speed undulations on Calle Medusa could slightly reduce overall vehicular speeds and
may divert traffic, onto adjacent streets.
In conclusion, based on the City's previous experience with street closure, speed bump
installation, and all-way stop installation, it is staffs opinion that the only effective and long-term
solution to speeding without impacting the entire neighborhood, is consistent enforcement of the
existing traffic laws.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Map of Resident Survey Area.
R:~agdrpt~2000\1128\callemedusasurvey
3
Calle Medusa- Resident Survey Area
ITEM 14
APPROVAL.
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINANCE_~--
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
November 28, 2000
Adopt Ordinance No. 2000-13 Rezoning Approximately 32.6 Acres of Property
on the South Side of State Route 79 (South) East of Jedediah Smith Road;
Adopt a resolution approving a General Plan Amendment Removing the Western
Portion of Via Rio Temecula from the General Plan Circulation Element; and
approve a Settlement and Release Agreement between the City and Old Vail
Partners
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions:
1. Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79
(SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING
SECTIONS '17.22.t30 THROUGH 17.22.'138 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLI CATION NO. 99-0261)
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL
PLAN OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REMOVING THE WESTERN
PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA FROM THE GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0371)
R:/Agenda Reports/Old Vail Partners I
Approve the Settlement and Release Agreement between the City and Old Vail
Partners in substantially the form presented and authorize the Mayor to execute
the Agreement on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND: At your October 24, 2000 meeting, a public hearing was held on
the zone change application and General Plan Amendment for Planning Application No.
99-0261 for the property located on approximately 32.6 acres of Property on the south
side of State Route 79 (South) east of Jedediah Smith Road. Following conclusion of
the public hearing, the Council introduced Ordinance No. 2000-13 approving the zone
change requested by the Applicant, LandGrant Development and the owner of the
property, Old Vail Partners. This Ordinance is now ready for second reading and final
approval.
The public hearing also considered an amendment to the General Plan which would
remove the western portion of Via Rio Temecula from the Circulation Element of the
General Plan. The Resolution approving this amendment is now ready for approval by
the Council.
During the hearing, the owner of the property, Old Vail Partners, agreed to release the
City, its officers, employees and agents from any claims or causes of action for the zone
changes approved by the Council for the since 1991, any delays in approving the zone
changes requested by the owner of the property, and any other claims or causes of
action which the property owner may have against the City, its officers, employees or
agents with respect to zoning and land use entitlements for the property. This release
includes claims for down zoning, takings, and temporary takings. The City Attorney's
Office prepared the attached Settlement and Release Agreement. it has been signed by
the property owner and is now ready for approval by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. 2000-13
2. Resolution No. 2000-
3. Settlement and Release Agreement
R:/Agenda Reports/Old Vail Partners
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 79
(SOUTH) EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-010-006, AND ADDING
SECTIONS 17.22.130 THROUGH 17.22.138 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
DISTRICT NO. 4 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0261)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall
be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to amend the Zoning Map to accurately reflect private property
and to be consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on June 27, 2000,
and recommended that the City Council approve the attached amendments to the City Zoning Map
and Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on September 28, 2000
to consider the proposed amendments to the City Zoning Map and the Temecula Municipal Code.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section t. Amendments To The City Zoninq Map The City Council hereby amends the
Zoning Map for the City of Temecula for a parcel identified as APN 961-010-006 from Professional
Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay No. 4 (PDO-4).
Section 2. Planned Development Overlay No. 4 Sections 17.22.130through 17.22.138 are
hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as set forth in the supplemental standards
and requirements for PDO-4, Planned Development Overlay District No. 4 as contained in Exhibit 1
of this Ordinance. PDO-4 is subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit 2.
Section 3. Environmental Review. The City Council, on the basis of the whole record
before it including the Initial Environmental Study, finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment and further that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration reflects its independent judgment, and hereby adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration
for Planning Application 99-0261. The Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in Exhibit 3 of this
Ords~2000-13
1
Ordinance.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 6. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption
· of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the
manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of November, 2000.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA . )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 2000-13 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of October, 2000 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of November,
2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:None
COUNCILMEMBERS:None
COUNCILMEMBERS:None
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ords~000-13
2
EXHIBIT 1
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4
Ords~000-13
3
TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
17.22.130 Title
Sections 17.22.130 through 17.22.138 shall be known as "PDO-4" (Temecula Creek Village
Planned Development Overlay District).
17.22.132 Purpose and Intent
The Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-4) is intended
meet the planned mixed use criteria contained in the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
These requirements are intended to provide regulations for the creative design of, and the safe and
efficient operation of a unique mixed area within the City.
17.22.134 Relationship with the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines
A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the Temecula
Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table 17.22.136.
B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.22.138, the following rules and
regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area.
1. The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to any
development within a Professional Office zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is
deemed complete.
The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is
deemed complete.
3. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are in
effect at the time the application is deemed complete.
4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete.
17.22.136 Use Regulations
The list of permitted land uses for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development
Overlay district is contained in Table 17.22.136.B. Planned Development Oveday- 4 contains three
different planning areas. Two of the areas are commercial, the third is residentially based. A copy
of the Planning Area map for this PDO is contained in Exhibit 17.22.136. The three areas are
identified as follows:
· Retail/Support Commercial. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4R in Table 17.22.136.B),
· Village Commercial Area. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4V in Table 17.22.136.B);
and,
· Multi-Family Residential Planning Areas. Unless specific standards are provided forthis
Planning Development Overlay, the residential development standards for the High
Density Zoning District contained in Section 17.06 shall apply to this Planning Area.
Ords~000-13
4
Table 17.22.136A
Planning Area Exhibit
Temecula Creek Villa~ent Overlay District
R:~P D OL,=9-0261 79 South~CC PDO Ordinance.~oc
Table 17.22.136A
Planning Area Exhibit
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Ords~000-13
5
Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall be a permitted use. A letter "C" indicates the
use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Where
indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone.
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4v8
A
Adult business
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzemise/martial arts studios (less th'an p p
5,000 sq. ft.)
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (greater p
than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Airports
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) P
Alcoholic beverage sales C~
Ambulance services --
Animal hospital (indoor only) C
Antique restoration
Antique sales P
Apparel and accessory shops p p6
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P
Arcades (pinball and video games)
Art supply stores p p6
Auction houses
Auditoriums and conference facilities
Automobile dealers (new and used)
Automobile sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no
outdoor display
Automobile Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs
Automobile painting and body shop
Automobile repair services
Automobile rental C
Automobile salvage yards/impound yards
Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash
Automotive parts - sales P
Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine -with or without
an automated car wash
Ords~2000-13
6
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO'4vs
Bakery §oods distribution
Bakery retail p pO
Bakery wholesale
Banks and financial institutions P P
Barber and beauty shops P P
Bed and breakfast C
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) p po
Billiard padodpool hall
Binding of books and similar publications
Blood bank
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services P
Bookstores p po
Bowling alley P
Building material sales
Butcher shop P
C
Cabinet shop
Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) p pO
Candy/confectionery sales P P
Car wash, full service
Carpet and rug cleaning C
Catering services P
Clothing sales p po
Coins, purchase and sales P P
Cold storage facilities C
Communications and microwave installationsz
Communications equipment sales
Community care facilities C
Computer sales and service P
Congregate care housing for the elderly~ C
Construction equipment sales, service or rental
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental
Convenience market P C
Costume rentals P P
Crematoriums
Ords~2000-13
7
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I PDO-4R IPDO-4V°
Cutlery I P I P
D
Data processin9 equipment and systems P
Day care centers C C~
Delicatessen P P
Discount/department store (less than 20,000 square feet) P
Distribution facility
Drug store/pharmacy p p6
Dry cleaners P P
Dry cleaning plant
E
Emergency shelters
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) P
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage)
F
Feed and grain sales P
Financial, insurance, real estate offices P P"
Fire and police stations P P
Floor covering sales P
Florist shop P P~
Food processing
Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity P P
Freight terminals
~Fuel storage and distribution
Funeral parlors, mortuary
Furniture sales (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) P P~
Furniture transfer and storage
G
Garden supplies and equipment sales and service C
Gas distribution, meter and control station
General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft. P
Glass and mirrors, retail sales P
Governmental offices P P~
Grocery store, retail (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) P P6
Grocery store, wholesale
Guns and firearm sales P
Ords~2000-13
8
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use IPDO'4R I PDO'4VO
H
Hardware stores p p6
Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.) P P
Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.) P
Health food store P P
Health care facility P P
Heliports
Hobby supply shop P P6
Home and business maintenance service P
C
Hospitals
Hotels/motels
Ice cream parlor
Impound yard
Interior decorating service
J
P P
p p~
Junk or salvage yard
I I
K
Kennel
L
Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers
Laundromat
Laundry service (commercial)
P
Libraries, museums and galleries (private) P
Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution
Liquor stores C
Lithographic service
Locksmith
P
M
Machinery storage yard
Mail order businesses P
Ords~000-13
9
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use J PDO-4R I PDO-4V8
Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the
fotlowing:
Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and
fabrication of goods within enclosed building (no outside
storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objects, clothing, labor
intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes
which do not involve frequent truck traffic.
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging,
treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require
frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items.
Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed
building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals
storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or
semi-refined products requiring further processing or
manufacturing, and outside storage.
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage
Massage P P
Medical equipment sales/rental P
Membership~clubs, organizations, lodges C
Mini-storage or mini-warehouse4
Mobile home sales and service
Motion picture studio
Motorcycle sales and service
Movie theaters
Musical and recording studio
N
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club ~
Nurseries (retail) C
Nursing homes/convalescent homes C
O
Office equipment/supplies, sales/services P
~ Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than
50,000 sq. ft.
Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including,
but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, p p6
chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance
P
Paint and wallpaper stores [ P [
Ords~000-13
10
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I PDO'4R I PDO-4V8
Parcel delivery services
Parking lots and parking structures
Pawnshop
Personal service shops P P
Pest control services
Pet grooming/pet shop P P
Photographic studio P P
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed)
Postal distribution
Postal services P P
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.)
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) P
Q
Reserved
R
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices P
Radio/television transmitter
Recreational vehicle parks
Recreational vehicle sales
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed
building
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard
, Recycling collection facilities
Recycling processing facilities
Religious institution, without a day care or private school C
Religious institution, with a private school C
Religious institution, with a day care C
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or
industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business)
Residential, multiple-family housing
Restaurant with drive-through window
Restaurants and other eating establishments p p6
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment
Retail support use (15 percent of total development square footage in
BP and LI)
Rooming and boarding houses
Ords~000-13
11
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4V8
S
Scale, public
Schools, business and professional
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12)
' Scientific reseamh and development offices and laboratories
Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)~ C
Solid waste disposal facility
Sports and recreational facilities
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building3
Swap Meet, outdoor
Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales P
T
Tailor shop P P
Taxi or limousine service P
Tile sales P
Tobacco shop P
Tool and die casting
Transfer, moving and storage
Transportation terminals and stations
Truck rentals (no sales or/service)
TVNCR repair P P~
U
Upholstery shop I P I
V
Vending machine sales and service I I
W
Warehousing/distribution
Watch repair P P
Wedding chapels
Welding shop
Welding supply and service (enclosed)
Y
Reserved I I
Z
Reserved I I
Ords~2000-13
12
1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G), special standards for the sale of alcoholic
beverages.
2. Subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
3. See Section 17.08.050.(E), special standards for indoor swap meets.
4. See Section 17.080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehousefacilities.
5. In PDO-4, all senior housing residential projects shall use the development and
performance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions contained
in Section 17.06.050.H.
6. The size of the use or activity is limited to 5,000 square feet.
7. Outdoor entertainment in conjunction with an eating establishment is permitted provided
that the outside noise levels do not interfere with off-site conversation.
6. Drive through facilities are not allowed in the Village Planning Area.
Retail/Support Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4R.
Village Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4V.
Multi-Family Planning Areas A & B use the High Density column in Table 17.06.030.
17.22.138 Supplemental Design and Setback Standards
A. Multi-Family.
The requirements of the residential component shall depend upon the finai approved
residential density. Residential densities less than 12 units per acre shall comply with the
Medium Density Residential zone standards set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development
Code. Residential densities in excess of 12 units per acre shall comply with the High
Density Residential zone standards set forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code.
The finai maximum residential density shall be determined by a traffic analysis provided to
the City when an application for development is submitted. The total future project trip
generation shall not exceed the number of trips allowable under the General Plan
designation for the site.
B. Retail/Support Commemial.
The development standards for the Professional Office zoning designation set forth in
Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code shall be utilized for the Retail/Support Commercial
planning area.
The Village Planning Area for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay
has supplemental design guidelines integrated into this PDO. These guidelines are
intended to augment the previously adopted Citywide Design Guidelines with requirements
specific to this area and are as follows:
Ords~000-13
13
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
REMOVE THE WESTERN PORTION OF VIA RIO TEMECULA
FROM THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP (PLANNING
APPLICATION 99-0371)
WHEREAS, LandGrant Development filed Planning Application No. PA99-0371 (the
"Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on July 19, 2000, at a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had
an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to conditions after
finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to the Application on
September 26, 2000, at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition to the Application;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Application;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. General Plan Cimulation Element Amendment. Via Rio Temecula, west of
Avenda de Missiones is hereby removed from the Circulation Element Map of the General Plan for
the City of Temecula.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates
that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures that are attached to Mitigated
Negative Declaration for Planning Applications 99-0261 and 99-0371 that have been added to the
project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:Resos 2000/PA 99 0371
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 28th day of November, 2000.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No 2000- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of November, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNClLMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:Resos 2000/PA 99 0371 2
EXHIBIT 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Ords~O00-13
14
EXHIBIT B
CITY OFTEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No: PA99-0261 (Planned Development Overlay)
Project Description:
A Planned Development Overlay District to include 32.6
acres within the Professional Office (PO) zone and
General Plan Amendment located on the south side of
State Highway 79 South, west of Avenida De Missions
and east of Jedediah Smith Road
Assessor's Parcel No: 909-290-058
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One
Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One
Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to
enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration
required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15075. Ifwithin said forty-eight (48)hour period the applicant has not delivered to
the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above,
the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of such failure of to satisfy this
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
Ords~000-13
15
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the lans use approval without further notice to the applicant.
The applicant shall revise the site plan and text to include a public multi-purpose trail along
Temecula Creek.
This approval shall have no force or effect until such time as the General Plan Amendment
has been approved by the City Council, modifying the Circulation Element Map.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
Ords~O00-13
16
TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE
VILLAGE
The Village area will serve as the vital activity
center of Temecula Creek Village. Centrally located within
the project, this group of buildings will contain a welcome
mixture of goods and services to complement life in the
multi-family neighborhoods. A state-of-the-art clubhouse
facility will provide space for meeting rooms, a library and
reading rooms, computer rooms and other resident
amenities, as well as a "signature" pool and spa.
A. MIX OF USES
The site of the proposed Village area is
approximately seven acres, and will contain a variety of
shops and services, including:
-retail stores
-restaurants
.recreational facilities
-commercial services
-medical and dental offices
in some cases, office uses could be located above ground
floor retail spaces. In addition, the ancillary uses of the
residential neighborhoods, 'such as the Community
Clubhouse with its amenities and Suppor~ Retail will be
located in the Central Retail Hub.
B. SITE ORGANIZATION
The buildings in the village core will be organized
around the a central spine, which is also the primary entry
corridor to the development.
1. The mixed-use buildings planned for the Village Hub
area will be sited in such a way that their wails help to
define the streetscape.
a. The buildings closest to State Highway 79 will
be located at the minimum required front setback
from that road.
2. The primary driveway into the complex will be framed
by buildings on either side, creating a "gateway" into the
central circulation corridor.
3. Additional buildings will be organized along the corridor,
with their entries pushed to the "imagined" property line
along tbe circulation road (the back of the sidewalk), creating
an "urban" environment. Pedestrian pass-throughs will be
created in the gaps between buildings ("paseos") to give
access from parking areas.
4. The buildings sited along the boulevard will be separated
to allow vehicular entry into the parking areas, which will
be located behind (and in some cases beside) the buildings.
6. The visual axis of the central corridor will be terminated
by the community center building and its associated open
space.
prirnaw
Architectural Driveway
· Gateway' Element
$ i 0 U T E U B Q ~ 0 U G II ~
TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE
'VILLAGE'
C, PARKING AND CIRCULATION
The clustering of re~ated uses in the Village Retail
Core makes shared parking opportunities possible. The
mix of offices, with their predominant daytime use, with
retail and restaurants, busy primarily at night, creates a
reciprocal parking condition. For this reason, the village
parking demand would be lower than what is otherwise
required by the City of Temecula's Development Code. It
is proposed that the total demand of the anticipated uses
will be five spaces per thousand square feet of leasable
retail/office area.
1. Direct vehicular access to the Village will be available
via a proposed controlled intersection along Highway 79
South onto the project's principle entry drive. This tree-
lined street will provide easy ingress to and egress from
the parking areas serving the facilities, in addition to angled
parking spaces located on the drive itself. Auto circulation
will feature a continuous loop through the public area of
the village, helping to alleviate congestion in this part of
the site.
AUTO CIRCULATION IN VILLAGE HUB
2. Parking lots will be located behind (and in some cases
beside) the proposed buildings, so that the buildings help
to screen the parking areas. The lots will be landscaped
to soften the hard edges of the paving, and provide pockets
of shade.
PARKING CONFIGURATION
~ RETAIL VILLAGE
3. The "downtown" core will also be served by double
rows of diagonal parking, angled in the direction of travel
both in and out of the village area. Pedestrian "collector"
walks will be detailed with contrasting paving materials
leading to identified crosswalks.
a. Accessible parking will be located in the
angled parking which is curbside near retail
entries.
b. Crosswalks will be laid out t¢
pedestrian plaza areas.
4. Convenient bike parking will be provided in the Village
core to encourage human-powered travel in this area.
PEDESTRIAN GATHERING AREA
TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE
'VILLAGE'
D. PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACES
Generous landscaped plaza areas are planned in
the midst of the retail village to encourage the accumulation
of patrons in the core who w~ll visit a number of
establishments on any given outing.
1. These outdoor gathering areas will be linked to the
system of walkways and bike paths which traverse the
site, creating convenient access for residentS.
2. Pedestrian gathering areas will be made comfortable
through the inclusion of amenities which encourage rest
stops:
-benches and shade structures or trees
-trash cans and (where applicable) ash urns
-kiosks
E. BUILDING SCALE AND DESIGN
1. The V~llage area strUctures will be limited to one or two
stories, and will be designed to be complementary to the
existing residential scale of the neighborhood.
d. large openings with clear glass will be provided
at the street level to provide increased visibility
into the retail spaces.
e. select staggering of upper and lower floors
to avoid unbroken two-story wall surfaces.
f. use of staggered parapet heights and sloping
roof forms to give variety to building
"skylines."
3. Buildings with ground floor retail will be set close to the
streets to facilitate pedestrian access.
4. Restaurants and food uses within the village will be
encouraged to provide outdoor dining facilities. Where
possible, these "fresh-air" eating patios shouid adjoin
pedestrian walkways.
RETAIL ELEVATION ~ ENTRY ~. ~
2. Buildings will be designed to include sufficient articulation
of their mass to provide an adequate sense of scale.
Specific details which may be used for this purpose include:
a. Offsetting portions of the buildings to avoid
long expanses of unbroken wall surface.
b. Locating entdes and fenestration in recesses
to provide additional shade and shadow on
the building faces.
c. Use of awnings, canopies, and blade signs
to provide additional light/shadow play and
visual rhythms.
~Ct'ERIOR pERSPECTIVE ~ VILLAGE AREA
5. Exterior building finishes should consist of a
complementary variety of quality materials, including the
following:
-exterior plaster in various textures and colors
-exposed colored concrete block of split face,
fluted, burnished, or sandblasted textures
-brick and natural or cultured stone
-decorative architectural metals, such as grilles
or railings
-metal or concrete (not mission) tile roofs
-metal or fabric canopies or awnings
TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE
'VILLAGE'
-clear and/or tinted glass (non-reflective)
-glazed ceramic or natural porcelain tile
accentS
-slate tile'
.decorative light fixtures
.architectural accent lighting
-limited use of wood trim around glazed
openings
F. LANDSCAPING
Landscaping in the Village will generally be used
to complement the building amhitecture, provide color,
scent, shadow and movement, and contTibute to the overall
'comfort and all, activeneSs of the development. A hieramhy
will be established in the plant palette which uses the
largest materials in the most open areas, with the scale
progressively diminishing as transitions are made to
predominantly pedestrian areas.
1. Special themed landscaping will be developed to identify
the entrances from the existing public streets to the various
parts of the development.
a. Repetition of particular colors, leafforms,
or plant groupings.
b. inclusion of architectural landscape
. elementS, such as Iow walls or lamp posts.
.THEMED" LANDSCAPING
2. "Street" trees will be chosen for the village area which
bring color and shade, but do not litter the sidewalks.
These trees will be located in tree wells where they may
be underplanted with drought tolerant annuals or perennials.
3. Parking lot trees will be chosen for ti
canopies, to provide a maximum of shade on the
areas.
4. Strip planters a minimum of seven feet wide will be
provided at each end of every column of parking spaces,
and finger planters will be provided at a minimum of one
for every ten spaces.
=ARKING AREA pLANTING
5. Pedestrian paths and gathering areas should feature
a large-scale tree as a focal point, but will be accented
with lower plant materials chosen for their durability, color,
and scent. In order to protect plantings in heavily traveled
areas, the planters may be curbed or raised above grade.
Candidates for plant materials include the following:
-salvias, achilleas, jasmines, wisteria, crape
myrtle, limonium, oenothera, and cape
plumbago
EXHIBIT 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT NO. 4
Ords~000-13
17
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. 99-0261 (Planned Development Ovenay District No. 4)
Planning Application No. 99-0371 (General Plan Amendment)
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
To ensure that any future traffic impacts originating
from this site are equal to or less than the number of
average daily trips identified in the traffic study for the
General Plan.
Submit a traffic study with the first subsequent
Planning Application.
Submit a comprehensive traffic study with the first
subsequent Planning Application to determine the
maximum number of residential units and commercial
square footage that can be constructed on the site.
The assumptions and results of the study shall be
approved by the Public Works and Planning
Departments pdor to any completeness
determinations.
Prior to the being determined complete and being
scheduled for any public hearing.
Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitor:
The removal of an east/west connector road between
Avenida de Missions and Jedediah Smith.
An access shall be provided that is publicly accessible
that will provide an east/west connection between
Avenida de Missions and Jedediah Smith Road.
Incorporate a public travel way east/west connection
between Avenida de Missions and the intersection of
Jedediah Smith Road with Highway 79 - South.
Prior to the approval of any subsequent Planning
Applications on this site.
Planning Department
R:~P D O~99-0261 79 South~it MonrO Prog.doc 1
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitor:
Adverse change in the significance of a historical or
archaeological resource
Identify, recover, preserve and document resources of
historical and archaeological significance
Condition the project upon the requirement that if any
cultural resources or human remains are exposed dudng
grading, ground disturbance activities in the vicinity of the
discovery shall be terminated immediately and the City
shall be contacted and a qualified archaeologist shall be
brought to the site to evaluate the resource. If discovered
resources merit long-term . consideration, adequate
funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report
these resources.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and during all
grading operations
Planning Department and Department of Public Works
R:~ D O~99-0261 79 South~,4it Mont'g Prog.d~¢
2
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this 28~h day of November, 2000 by and
between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation of the State of California, and
Old Vail Partners, a California general partnership ("Old Vail") (collectively the "Parties").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on or about June 28, 1988, the Board of Supervisors for the County of
Riverside adopted Resolution No. 88-192 creating Special Assessment District No. 159, pursuant
to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Streets & Highways Code §10200 et seq.).
WHEREAS, located within Special Assessment District No. 159 is that certain real
property, now commonly known as 30905 Highway 79 South, Temecula, California, Assessor's
Parcel Number 961-010-006 (the "Property"). The County of Riverside subsequently zoned the
Property "CPS" - Scenic Highway Commercial.
WHEREAS, on or about November 21, 1989, Old Vail pumhased the Property.
WHEREAS, on or about December 1, 1989, the City, ifffurtherance of its incorporation
as a distinct political entity, included the Property within its municipal boundaries.
WHEREAS, on or about November 9, 1993, the City adopted a General Plan, which
designated the Property for "Office Professional" use.
WltEREAS, on or about December 19, 1995, the City adopted a conformance Zoning
Ordinance which, consistent with the General Plan, designated the Property within the "Office
Professional" zone.
WHEREAS, as a result of the City's General Plan and/or Zoning Ordinance designations
and subsequent alleged actions or inactions with respect to the Property, Old Vail filed a series of
state and federal actions against the City, inter alia, for inverse condemnation and related claims,
entitled:
Old Vail Partners v. County of Riverside et al, RSC Case No. 253598 and RSC
Case No. 268973, which actions were dismissed as to the City by the Superior
Court of the County of Riverside (Hon. Victor Miceli), and which dismissal of the
City was ultimately affirmed by the Fourth District Court of Appeals.
Old Vail Partners v. County of Riverside et al, RSC Case No. 278127, in which
action, on or about April 25, 1996, the City and Old Vail executed a stipulation to
11086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
dismiss the action without prejudice and to toll all applicable statutes of
limitation.
Old Vail Partners v. County of Riverside et al, USDC So. Dist., Case No.
941228H (CM), which action was transferred to the U.S. District Court, Central
District, and redesignated as CV 94-6309 (CBM (Ctx).
Old Vail Partners v. County of Riverside et al, USDC Central District, Case No.
CV 94-6309-CBM (Ctx), which action was dismissed by the District Court (Hon.
Consuelo B. Marshall), and upon the appeal thereof by Old Vail, the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeal issued an opinion reversing the decision of the District Court but
abstaining from jurisdiction under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Old
Vail's petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was
denied.
Old Vail Partners v. City of Temecula, Case No. RIC 312020, which action was a
reinstatement of Old Vail's prior action, Case No. RSC 278127, and which,
following heating on the City's demurrer, the City and Old Vail again executed a
stipulation to dismiss the action without prejudice and to toll all applicable
statutes of limitation.
The totality of all litigation proceedings referenced in these recitals shall generally be
denoted as the "Litigation".
WHEREAS, on or about June 27, 2000, the Planning Commission for the City of
Temecula duly held a public hearing on Old Vail's Planning Application No. 99-0261, and
recommended that the City Council approve the petitioned amendments to the City Zoning Map
and Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, on or about July 17, 2000, the Planning Commission for the City of
Temecula considered Planning Application Nos. 99-0261 and 99-0371 submitted by LandGrant
and Old Vail at a duly noticed public hearing, at which time the City staff and interested persons
had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. Planning
Application No. 99-0261 is an application for approval of an amendment to the City's
Development Code adding Sections 17.22.130 through 17.22.138 to the Temecula Municipal
Code establishing the "Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-
4)" upon the Property (hereinafter "Temecula Creek Village PDO-4"). Planning Application
No. 99-0371 is a General Plan Amendment removing the western portion of Via Rio Temecula
from the General Plan Circulation Map. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing
and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended approval
to the City Council of Old Vail's Planning Application No. 99-0261 and Planning Application
No. 99-0371.
! 1086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
-2-
WHEREAS, on or about September 26, 2000, the City Council for the City of Temecula
convened at a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendations of the Planning
Commission for the approval of Old Vail's Planning Applications 99-0261 and 99-0371. Upon
heating all testimony either in support of or opposition to these matters, the City Council decided
to further review these matters and continue hearing until October 24, 2000.
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2000, the City Council for the City of Temecula again
considered Old Vail's Planning Applications 99-0261 and 99-0371 at a duly noticed continued
public hearing, at which time City staff and interested persons had an oppommity to, and did
testify either in support of or opposition to these matters. At the conclusion of this hearing and
after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council unanimously introduced Ordinance
No. 2000-13 approving Old Vail's Planning Application 99-0261, establishing the Temecula
Creek Village PDO-4 and certifying the preparation of a mitigated negative declaration in
accordance with applicable law.
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2000, the City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance
No. 2000-13 approving Old Vail's Planning Application 99-0261, establishing the Temecula
Creek Village PDO-4 and certifying the preparation of a mitigated negative declaration in
accordance with applicable law and unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2000-
approving the General Plan Amendment removing the western portion of Via Rio Temecula
from the General Plan Cimulation Map, Planning Application No. 99-0371. The rights,
obligations and benefits conferred in connection with the approval of Ordinance No. 2000-13 and
Resolution No. 2000-__ shall hereinafter be referred to as "Entitlements" and include,
without limitation, a maximum of four hundred (400) multi-family residential units and a
maximum of one hundred twenty three thousand (123,000) square feet of commercial space as
set forth in the Temecula Creek Village PDO-4 as set forth in Ordinance No. 2000-13.
WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to reach a full and complete settlement of all issues
which were, or could have been, raised in the Litigation and which were, or could have been,
raised with respect to the City's alleged actions or inactions with respect to the Property.
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
promises and covenants hereinafter set forth, hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1.
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
Section 1.01. General Term. The Parties understand and agree that, in the context of
processing land use applications under Ordinance No. 2000-13, establishing the Temecula Creek
Village PDO-4, the City cannot guarantee the ultimate outcome of any public heatings before the
086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
City Council or other public bodies of the City or otherwise, nor prevent any opposition thereto
by members of the public affected by or interested in future applications under the Temecula
Creek Village PDO-4. The Parties further understand that land use regulations involve the
exercise of the City's police power and, at the time of executing this Agreement, it is settled
federal and California law that government may not contract away its right to exercise its police
power in the future. Avco Community Developers Inc. v. South Coast Regional Com., 17 Cal.3d
785, 800 (1976); City of Glendale v. Superior Court, 18 Cal.App.4th 1768 (1993). Subject to the
foregoing, the City, to the extent allowed by law, and Old Vail, shall each endeavor to facilitate
and promote the proceedings necessary to complete processing of the land use applications under
the Temecula Creek Village PDO-4, and the City shall diligently process any future land use
approval, environmental action and/or other act(s) necessary under the Temecula Creek Village
PDO-4 without unnecessary delay. The City shall neither undertake, advocate nor promote the
performance of any actions that would be inimical, injurious or counterproductive to the
Entitlements set forth in the Temecula Creek Village PDO-4 and the General Plan Amendment.
Section 1.02. Legal Challenge to Project Approval. In the event that a claim, suit or
action of any nature whatsoever is undertaken to challenge the adoption of Ordinance No. 2000-
13 and Resolution No. 2000- , or the Entitlement set forth therein, and subject to Section
1.01 above, the City and Old Vail covenant to diligently and jointly defend, at their separate cost,
the approval of the Entitlement set forth in the Temecula Creek Village PDO-4 and the General
Plan Amendment against any such claim, suit or action of any nature whatsoever seeking to
challenge, overturn or in any manner impair the approval of the Temecula Creek Village PDO-4
and/or the Entitlements. Ifa court, tribunal or other body of competent jurisdiction renders a
decision impairing or in any manner interfering with the Entitlements conferred by the City's
approval of Ordinance No. 2000-13 and Resolution No. 2000- , then the City shall
facilitate and support to the fullest extent allowed by law Old Vail's efforts to preserve, restore or
rehabilitate those Entitlements granted by the adoption of Ordinance No. 2000-13 and Resolution
No. 2000- , but subsequently impaired by the court, tribunal or other body of competent
jurisdiction. The Parties agree that such facilitation and support does not in any way constitute a
guarantee of the outcome thereof.
ARTICLE 2.
MUTUAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
Section 2.01. Scope of Release. The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the
mutual release and discharge of claims contained in Sections 2.02-2.03 is contingent upon the
vesting of the Entitlements. Such "vesting" of Entitlements shall occur on the later of the
t following dates:
(1) The effective date of Ordinance No. 2000-13;
! 1086\0559~634396.1 November 17, 2000
-4-
(2)
The date upon which the statute of limitations has run on the time for
filing a challenge to the approval of Ordinance No. 2000-13, the Temecula
Creek Village PDO-4 and Resolution No. 2000- , provided that no
claim, suit or legal action of any nature whatsoever, which seeks to
overturn, impair or hinder any Entitlement, is pending at such time; or
(3)
The date upon which any claim, suit or legal action of any nature
whatsoever has been finally determined in favor of those Entitlements
pertaining to the Temecula Creek Village PDO-4.
Section 2.02. Mutual Release and Discharge of Claims. In consideration of the promises
of the Parties specified in this Agreement, and contingent and effective upon the vesting of the
Entitlements as set forth in Section 2.01 above, the Parties shall fully and forever release, acquit,
and discharge each other, their officers, elected officials, attorneys, sureties, agents, servants,
representatives, employees, subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, predecessors, successors-in-interest,
assigns, and all persons acting by, through, under or in concert with them of and from any and all
past, present, or future claims, demands, obligations, actions, causes of action, including those
for damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, or for relief by way of writ of mandate, for costs,
losses of service, expenses, liability, suits, and compensation of any nature whatsoever, whether
based on tort, contract, or other theory of recovery, known or unknown, that they now have, have
had, asserted or could have asserted in the Litigation or otherwise that relate to the Property or to
the alleged actions or inactions of the City with respect to the Property. Nothing contained herein
shall relieve any Party hereto of its/their continuing obligations imposed by law or by the
provisions of this Agreement.
Section 2.03. Waiver of California Civil Code Section 1542. The Parties hereto
acknowledge that they are familiar with Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which
provides:
A general release does not extend to claims which a creditor does
not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing
the release, which if known by him must have materially affected
his settlement with the debtor.
The Parties being aware of the aforesaid code section, each hereby expressly waives any
rights they might have thereunder.
This release shall not operate to release any claims the Parties may later have for the
enforcement of the obligations created by this Agreement.
11086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
Section 2.04. Dismissal of Litigation. The Parties acknowledge that, as of the execution
of this Agreement, Old Vail does not have any legal action pending against the City. Rather, the
preservation of Old Vall's rights as against the City in connection with the Property are generally
memorialized in a "stipulation to dismiss without prejudice and toll all applicable statutes of
limitations," executed by the Parties' respective legal counsel on or about September 15, 1998.
The Parties intend these claims as well as all other legal causes of action and/or other rights of
action existing at or before the execution of this Agreement to be mutually released in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 2.02-2.03 hereto, but only after the vesting of
Entitlements described in Section 2.01 hereto. No formal document riling with the any court of
competent jurisdiction shall be necessary to effectuate this mutual release and discharge of
claims upon the vesting of the Entitlements. However, upon the vesting of the Entitlements, the
"stipulation to dismiss without prejudice and toll all applicable statutes of limitations" shall be
deemed to be null and void, and instead, any and all Litigation against the City shall be deemed
to be dismissed by Old Vail with prejudice.
Section 2.05. No Assignment of Claims. Old Vail warrants and represents to the City
that it has not assigned, conveyed or otherwise transferred any of its rights to the claims
described in the Article to any other person, entity, firm or corporation not a party to this
Agreement, in any manner, including by way of subrogation or operation of law or otherwise,
and that Old Vail is the sole owner of all of the claims described in this Article. In the event that
any claim, demand or suit is made or instituted against the City because Old Vail made an actual
assignment or transfer, Old Vail agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless against such
claim, and to pay and satisfy any such claim, including necessary expenses of investigation,
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
ARTICLE 3
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 3.01. Verbal Representations. This Agreement contains the complete expression
of the whole agreement between the Parties hereto, and there are no promises, representations,
agreements, warranties or inducements, either expressed verbally or implied, except as are fully
set forth herein. This Agreement cannot be enlarged, modified, or changed in any respect except
by written agreement between the Parties.
Section 3.02. Severabilit¥ of Provisions. Each provision of this Agreement, whether or
not contained in separate paragraphs, shall be considered severable. If for any reason any such
provision(s) or parts of such provision(s) thereof are determined to be invalid, unenforceable or
contrary to any existing or future applicable law or judicial ruling, such invalidity shall not
impair the operation of nor affect those portions of this Agreement which are valid, but in such
11086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
-6-
event, this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in all respects as if such invalid or
unenforceable provision(s) or part of such provision(s) has been omitted.
Section 3.03. Binding Effect. Each and all of the covenants, conditions and restrictions
in this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Parties, their
successors-in-interest, agents, representatives, assignees, transferees or any party claiming by
derivative right an interest in the Entitlements granted by the approval of the Temecula Creek
Village PDO-4.
Section 3.04. Representation of Comprehension. In entering into this Agreement, the
Parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys, who are the
attomeys of their own choice, and that these terms are fully undertaken and voluntarily accepted
by them. The parties further represent that they have no question with regard to the legal import
of any term, word, phrase, or portion of this Agreement, or the Agreement in its entirety, and
accept the terms of this Agreement as written.
Section 3.05. Authority to Execute Agreement. The Parties hereto represent and warrant
to each other that they have full authority to execute this Agreement, and that no individual,
corporation, partnership or other entity has any interest in the claims and/or potential claims
described herein. The Parties further represent and warrant that they will indemnify and hold
each other harmless from any and all claims, causes of action or other rights asserted by any
other person, corporation, partnership, or other entity with respect to any such assigned claims.
Section 3.06. Draftsmanship and Headings. The headings employed to identify the
provisions contained herein are solely for the convenience of the parties to this Agreement. If
any ambiguity appears in either the headings or the provisions attendant thereto, such ambiguity
shall not be construed against any party to this Agreement on the grounds that such party drafted
this Agreement.
Section 3.07. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, any and all
notices or other communications required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be served
on or given to either Party to this Agreement by the other Party shall be in writing and shall be
deemed duly served and given when personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed or to
any managing employee or officer of that Party, or, in lieu of personal service, on the fifth
business day following deposit in the United States mail, Certified, postage prepaid, addressed
to:
Old Vail Partners
c/o Harold S. Elkan
5230 Carroll Canyon Rd., Suite 310
San Diego, California 92121.
086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
-7*
City Clerk for the City of Temecula
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Section 3.08. Legal Costs. If any litigation is commenced between the Parties to this
Agreement concerning the rights and duties of either in relation to this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to, in addition to any other relief that may be granted in the litigation,
reasonable attorneys fees as determined by the court presiding over the dispute.
Section 3.09. Venue and Choice of Law. Any action at law, suit in equity, or other
judicial proceeding for the enfomement of this Agreement or any provisions thereof, may only be
instituted in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. The Parties further
agree that this Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted according to the laws of the State
of California.
Section 3.10. Execution in counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this AGREEMENT in the
State of California.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey Stone
Mayor
Attested to:
Susan Jones, City Clerk
OLD VAIL PARTNERS
By: RSCH Holdings, Inc.
General Partner
086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
'8-
[Signatures continue]
By:¸
By:
Name:
Title:
Harold Elkan, President
Approved as to Form:
DETISCH & CHRISTENSEN
By:.
Charles B. Christensen, Esq.,
Attomeys for OLD VAIL PARTNERS
RICHARD, WATSON & GERSHON, a Professional Corporation
By:
Peter M. Thorson, Esq.
City Attomey for CITY OF TEMECULA
11086\0559\634396.1 November 17, 2000
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
NOVEMBER '14, 2000
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:46
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Comerchero presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 3 DIRECTORS: Pratt, Stone, and Comerchero
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Naggar, Roberts
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 17, and 24, 2000.
2 Contract Change Order No. 2, and Completion and Acceptance of Rancho California Sports
Park Parkin,q Lot Rehabilitation - Proiect No. PW00-05CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $9,146.00 for additional
costs associated with the removal and replacement of unsuitable subgrade
material.
2.2 Accept the project "Rancho California Sports Park Parking Lot Rehabilitation -
Project No. PW00-05CSD" as complete.
2.3 Authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion.
2.4 Accept the Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract.
MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. The motion
was seconded by Director Councilman Pratt and voice vote unanimous with the exception of
Directors Naggar and Roberts who were absent.
Minutes.csd\l 11400 1
PUBLIC HEARING
3 Proposed Residential Street L ,qht n,q Rates and Char,qes - Tract 29036 - Service Level B
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON JANUARY 4, 200'1 REGARDING SERVICE LEVEL B
RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 29036 IN ORDER TO
ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATE AND CHARGES
BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 200'1-2002 PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
3.2
Approve the election notice, ballot, and procedures for the completion, return and
tabulation of the ballots.
3.3
Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the
aforementioned process.
Due to Directors Naggar and Councilman Pratt's absence and President Comerchero's conflict
of voting on the matter because of close proximity to his residence, the following motion was
offered:
MOTION: Director Stone moved to continue the matter to the November 28, 2000, City Council
meeting. The motion was seconded by Director Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Directors Naggar and Roberts who were absent.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No comments.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
Minutes.csd\l 11400 2
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:49 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday,
November 28, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.csd\l 11400 3
ITEM 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL /m Ii
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE__~:~I-'
GENERAL MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
General Manager/Board of Directors
Herman Parker, Director of Community Services~.
November 28, 2000
Award of Construction Contract for Rancho California Sports Park Field
Lighting - Project No. PW00-19CSD
PREPARED BY: ~JW,william G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brian Guillot, Assistant Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Award a contract for Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting, Project No. PW00-
19CSD, to MacKenzie Electric, Inc. (MEI, Inc.) for $494,990.00, and authorize the
President to execute the contract.
Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $49,499.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Approve an appropriation in the amount of $105,000.00 from the Community Services
District Fund Balance.
BACKGROUND: On September 26, 2000, the Board of Directors approved the plans and
specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids.
The project provides for the installation of a new Musco sports lighting system for the fields at
Rancho California Sports Park. The project will expand the amount of recreational facilities
available for night use.
When originally budgeted, the project called for lighting three (3) additional ball fields at the Rancho
California Sports Park. Through the design process, it was determined that all six (6) un-lighted
fields on Rancho Vista and the soccer overlays could be lighted for a marginal increase in the
original budget. Through careful finanbial management, the Community Services Department
experienced a higher than anticipated operating budget savings at the end of last fiscal year. It is
recommended that a portion of that savings be appropriated to this project so that all Rancho Vista
fields may be lighted.
Plans and Specifications are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. The
engineer's estimate was $435,000.00.
Eight (8) bids were publicly opened on November 15, 2000, and results are as follows:
1. MacKenzie Electric, Inc ................................................................................ $494,990.00
2. Rokel Services ........................................................................................ $544,684.00
3. Rymax Electric, Inc ................................................................................... $578,900.00
4. Power Distributors ........................................................................................ $584,147.00
5. Ace Electric
.................................................................................. $590,000.00
6. Malibu Pacific
.................................................................................. $659,425.00
7. Gould Electric .............................................................................................. $720,000.00
8. Datum Group, Inc ......................................................................................... $843,416.00
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found that MacKenzie Electric, Inc. is the lowest
responsible bidder for this project. MacKenzie Electric, Inc. has satisfactorily completed similar
construction projects for the City of Mission Viejo and other agencies.
The specifications require that the project be completed by March 2, 2001. Work is expected to
begin the week of December 11,2000.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting project is funded through
Development Impact Fees - Parks and Recreation and Developer Reimbursement. Since the Iow
bid exceeded the approved budget amount for the FY2000-01, the appropriation from the
Community Service District Unreserved Fund Balance is necessary in Account No. 210-190-174-
5804, for the construction contract of $494,990.00 plus the 10% contingency of $49,499.00 for a
total project cost of $544,489.00. Adequate budget savings are available from FY1999-00 for this
appropriation request.
ATTACHMENT:
Project Location
Project Description
Construction Contract
2
R:'~AGDRPT~2000\I 128\PW00-19 AWD.DOC
Z
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PWOO-19CSD
RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK FIELD LIGHTING
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 28th day of November, 2000 ,by and between
the Temecula Community Services District, City of Temecula, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and MacKenzie Electric, Inc., hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually
agree as follows:
1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW00-19CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK FIELD LIGHTING, Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of
California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where
specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version
of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements
as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California
(hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-19CSD,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK FIELD LIGHTING. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW00-19CSD, RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK FIELD LIGHTING.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
CONTRACT CA*I r:~cip\projects\pw~-19~CONTRACT
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW00-19CSD,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA SPORTS PARK FIELD LIGHTING
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
DISTRICT APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and
subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The DISTRICT agrees to pay, and
CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the
sum of: FOUR HUNDRED NINETY FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY
DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($494,990.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work by March 2, 2001, commencing with
delivery of a Notice to Proceed by DISTRICT. Construction shall not commence until
bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the Board of Directors,
except that the General Manager is hereby authorized by the Board of Directors to
make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the
contingency as established by the Board of Directors.
PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the DISTRICT, the CONTRACTOR
CONTRACT CA*2 r:~cip\p rojects\pwoo- 19~C ON TRACT
shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work
completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be
submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the
work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof
unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment
and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final
Release with the DISTRICT on forms provided by the DISTRICT.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the General Manager, stating that the
work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty
(30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete. The Board hereby delegates its authority to reduce
the retention to the Engineer.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the DISTRICT shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure
warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the
following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00- $500,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2%ofamountin
excess of $75,000
Over $500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to DISTRICT the sum
of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by DISTRICT.
CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify DISTRICT of any such delay.
CONTRACT CA-3 r:~cip~projects~pwoo-19~CONTRACT
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to DISTRICT, in writing, all claims for
compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has
disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each
payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the DISTRICT related to the
payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and
indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the Board of Directors has obtained the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for
each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
DISTRICT, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him,
in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT,
its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of
persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly
or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the DISTRICT.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the DISTRICT
for any and all costs incurred by the DISTRICT as a result of Stop Notices filed against
the project. The DISTRICT shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final
payments due to the DISTRICT.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to DISTRICT's
employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or
securing favorable treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any District officer or
employee, or any amhitect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and
Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its
employ has been employed by the DISTRICT within one year of the date of the Notice
Inviting Bids.
CONTRACT CA-4 ~cip~projects~pweo-19\CONTRACT
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the General Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to DISTRICT.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the
DISTRICT.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by DISTRICT and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The District and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of
the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation
concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district
court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation
between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the
Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
incurred in the litigation.
PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or
of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractodconsultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no
board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business
of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest
comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all
such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such
CONTRACT CA-5 r:~cip~projects~p,,,~oo- 19~C0 NTRACT
22.
23.
interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with
Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the
Government Code of the State of California.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the DISTRICT addressed as follows:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-6 r:~cip~o rojects~pwoo- 19~CONTRACT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR:
MacKenzie Electric, Inc.
7933 Palm Ave.
Highland, CA 92346
(909) 862-9906
By:
Patrick MacKenzie, President
DATED:
ClTY OFTEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICESDISTRICT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Jeff Comerchero, President
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-7 r:~cip~p roject s~owoo- 19\CONTRACT
ITEM 3
APPRO~V/AL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE...,~___
CiTY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
General ManagedBoard of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~:~
November 28, 2000
Tract 23513 - Service Level B, Proposed Residential Street Lighting
Rates and Charges
PREPARED BY:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND
GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 18,
2001 REGARDING SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR
TRACT NO. 23513 IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B
RATE AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION.
2. Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return and
Tabulation of the Ballots.
3. Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the
aforementioned process.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the
authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting services to
numerous residential subdivisions within the City of Temecula through Service Level B.
Pursuant to the request of the property owner, staff has initiated proceedings to assume the
responsibility for long-term residential street lighting services within Tract Map No. 23513 beginning
Fiscal Year 2001-2002. On October 10, 2000 and in accordance with Proposition 218, the Board of
Directors adopted the resolution of intention to file the levy report on lots 1-11 within Tract Map No.
23513. The Notice of Public Hearing was subsequently mailed to the property owner identifying the
R:\smithb\ElectionsX23513 Election~qmff-Notice of Election,doc 11/06/2000
proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for each affected parcel as follows:
Service Level B $25.68 per parcel
At tonight's Public Hearing, the Board of Directors must hear and consider all objections or protests to
the levy report for Tract Map No. 23513 and the proposed rates and charges. If the property owner
presents a written protest, the Board must reject the proposed fee and abandon any further
proceedings. In this instance, a homeowner's association would be required to assume the street
lighting responsibilities.
However, if the property owner does not submit a written protest against the proposed rates and
charges, the Board of Directors may then adopt the proposed fee subject to an election requiring a
majority approval of the affected property owners. In this instance, the Board of Directors can order
and call an election for January 18, 2001, and authorize staff to proceed with mailing a notice and
ballot to the property owner of Tract Map No. 23513, a copy of which is attached for your review.
Pursuant to the ballot process, staff is also recommending the approval of the attached Procedures for
the Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots. The ballot procedure explains the process for
completion, return and tabulation of the ballot and will be included as part of the mailed ballot
documents. The ballot can only be completed by the property owner of each parcel. In order to be
counted, the ballot must be completed in compliance with these procedures and returned to the City
Clerk/District Secretary prior to 3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001. The City Clerk/District Secretary will
open the ballot on January 18, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. in the Main Conference Room in City Hall. The
results of the election shall be announced by the City Clerk/District Secretary at that time and
presented to the Community Services District for formal certification at it's meeting on January 23,
2001.
FISCAL IMPACT: In the event that the Board of Directors calls for an election, staffwill prepare the
notices, ballot and election procedures in-house.
If approved by the property owners, beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the proposed levy of $25.68 per
parcel for Service Level B will generate $282.48 annually for residential street lighting services within
the subdivision. Sufficient funds will be generated to cover the costs of providing residential street
lighting services.
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution Calling and Noticing the Election,
Notice and Ballot Form.
Procedures for Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots.
Vicinity Map
R:~mithb\Elections~23513 Election~S~aff-Notice of Elccdon.dc~ 11115/2000
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 18, 2001 REGARDING
SERVICE LEVEL B RATE AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 23513 IN ORDER
TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES BEGINNING
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pureuant to the requirements of Article XIIID, Section 6 of the
California Constitution, there is hereby called and ordered to be held on January 18, 2001, an
election for the purpose of submitting to the preperty owners of Trect No. 23513 in the City of
Temecula proposed Service Level B Rates and Charges beginning Fiscal Year 2001-02.
Section 2. The notice and ballot to be submitted to the preperty owners shall be
substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. The Board of Directors hereby approves the Procedures for the
Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots ("Ballot Precedures") attached as Exhibit B and
incorporeted by this reference and directs such procedures be placed on file in the office of the
Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District and open to public inspection.
Section 4. All ballots must be received by the Secretary of the Temecula
Community Services District no later than 3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001. In all particulars not
recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided in the Ballot
Procedures.
Section 5. The Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District is
hereby authorized to canvass the returns of the election. The officers and staff of the Temecula
Community Services District are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as
may be necessary or appropriate in preparing for and conducting the election.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community
Services District this 28th day of November, 2000.
Jeff Comerchero President
R:Xsmithb\Elections~23513 Election\ Reso-Notice of Election.doc 11/06/2000
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City ClerldDistrict Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA)
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2000- . was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of November, 2000 by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
R:~smithb\Elections~23513 Election\ Reso-Notice of Election.doc I 1/06/2000
EXHIBIT A
OFFICIAl. BALLOT
TRACT NO. 23513
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL
STREET LIGHTING SERVICES
PROPERTY:
Being a subdivision of Parcels 1-3 of PM
8755, on file in Book 43 of Parcel Maps,
Pages 52 and 53, in the Office of the
Riverside County Recorder. Also being a
portion of the Temecula Rancho.
OWNER:
Todd Cunningham
Woodbridge Development
27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 230
Mission Viejo, CA 92691-6325
YES, I approve of the proposed
annual levy of $25.68 for Service
Level B on the parcels identified on
this ballot.
~--~ NO, I do not approve of the
proposed annual levy of $25.68 for
Service Level B on the parcels
identified on this ballot.
I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury that I am the record owner, or the authorized representative of
the record owner, of the parcels identified above.
Signature
Print Name
Date
CHECK ONLY ONE BOX. BALLOTS MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK AND RETURNED
TO THE CITY CLERK/DISTRICT SECRETARY AT THE CITY OF TEMECULA, P.O. BOX
9033/43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, 92589-9033 PRIOR TO
3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 18, 2001.
EXHIBIT B
NOTICE OF ELECTION
PROPOSED SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR
pARCEL MAP NO. 23513 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002
Pursuant to the request of the property owner of Lots 1-11 within Parcel Map No. 23513,
the Temecula Community Services District has initiated proceedings to assume maintenance of residential
street lighting within Parcel Map No. 23513, beginning with the Fiscal Year 2001/2002. Pursuant to this
request, and pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report")
to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which contains a description of each parcel of
property to be charged for this maintenance and the proposed mount of the maintenance charge for each
parcel for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
The proposed Service Level B rate and charge against each of the eleven (11) above
mentioned parcels within Parcel Map No. 23513 beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002 is $25.68. The
proposed levy rate of $25.68 per parcel provides revenue for residential street lighting services within this
subdivision.
On November 28, 2000 the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on the Report
and the proposed Service Level B rates and charges. At the public heaxing, the Board of Directors heard
and considered all objections or protests to the Report and to the proposed rates and charges. At the
conclusion of the public hearing, the Board determined that written protests against the proposed fee were
presented by less than a majority of owners of the parcels on which the proposed fee is to be imposed, and
levied the rates and charges subject to approval by the property owner subject to the proposed rates and
charges. The Board of Directors encourages you to return the enclosed ballot indicating whether you
support or oppose the proposed Service Level B rates and charges. Ballots may be mailed to the City
Clerk/District Secretary at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to the
City ClerkiDistrict Secretary at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590 no later than 3:30
p.m. on January 18, 2001.
The proposed Service Level B rates and charges will be abandoned if the ballot is not
returned in favor of the proposed rates and charges. In the event the proposed charges are abandoned, the
homeowners association will assume responsibility for residential street lighting services within the
subdivision.
Enclosed is your ballot and the District's Procedures for the completion, return and
tabulation of Ballots. Please consult these Procedures for details regarding the ballot process. You may
also contact the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box 9033,
Temecula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590, for further information regarding this matter.
RSsmithb\E[ections~23513 Election\Notice of Election-Procedures.doc 11/06/2000
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPLETION, RETURN, AND TABULATION OF BALLOTS
PARCEL MAP NO. 23513
I. Completion of Ballots
· Who may complete a ballot
The owner of the parcel to be charged may complete a ballot. As used in these Procedures, the term
"owner" includes the owner's authorized representative. If the owner of the parcel is a partnership, joint
tenancy, or tenancy in common, a ballot may be completed by any of the general partners, joint tenants,
or tenants in common. Only one ballot may be completed for each parcel.
· Duplicate ballots
If a ballot is lost, destroyed or never received, the City Clerk/District Secretary will provide a duplicate
ballot to the owner upon receipt of a request in writing to the City Clerk, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula,
California, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California 92590. The duplicate ballot will be marked to show the date on which the
ballot was provided and to identify it as a duplicate ballot.
· Marking and signing the ballot
To complete a ballot, the owner of the parcel must (1) mark the appropriate box supporting or opposing the
proposed rate and charge, and (2) sign, under penalty of perjury, the statement on the ballot that the person
completing the ballot is the owner of the parcel or the owner's authorized representative. Only one box
may be marked on each ballot. Ballots must be completed in ink.
· Only ballots provided by the District will be accepted
The District will only accept ballots mailed or otherwise provided to owners by the District. Photocopies,
faxes, and other forms of the ballot will not be accepted.
II. Return of Ballots
· Who may return ballots
A ballot may be returned by the owner of the parcel or by anyone authorized by the owner to return the
ballot.
· Where to return ballots
Ballots may be mailed to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula,
California, 92589-9033, (the District has provided a return postage-paid env.elope). Ballo. ts may also be
delivered in person to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590. Ballots may not be returned by fax.
· When to return ballots
All returned ballots must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office prior to 3:30 p.m. on
January 18, 2001. The City Clerk/District Secretary will stamp on the ballot the date of its receipt.
· Withdrawal of ballots
After returning a ballot to the District, the person who signed the ballot may withdraw the ballot by
· · . ' Drive,
submitting a written request in person to the Cay Clerk/D~stnct Secretary at 43200 Business Park
Temecula, California 92590. Such request must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary prior to
3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001. If any ballot has been withdrawn, the person withdrawing the ballot may
request a duplicate ballot. The City Clerk/District Secretary will retain all withdrawn ballots and will
indicate on the face of such ballots that they have been withdrawn.
IlL Tabulation of Ballots
· Which ballots will be counted
Only ballots, which are completed and returned in compliance with these procedures, will bc counted.
Ballots received by the City Clerk/District Secretary after 3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001 will not be
counted. Ballots, which arc not signed by the owner, will not be counted. Ballots with no boxes marked,
or with more than one box marked, will not be counted. Ballots withdrawn in accordance with these
procedures will not be counted.
The City Clerk/District Secretary will keep a record of each duplicate ballot provided to an owner and will
verify, prior to counting any duplicate ballot, that only one ballot has been returned for the parcel. If a non-
duplicate ballot has been returned, the District will count the non-duplicate ballot and disregard all
duplicate ballots. If only duplicate ballots have been returned, the District will count the earliest provided
duplicate ballot and disregard the later provided duplicate ballots.
· How ballots will be tabulated
Ballots may be counted by hand, by computer or by any other tabulating device.
· Who will tabulate ballots
Ballots will be tabulated by the City Clerk/District Secretary.
· When and where will the ballots be tabulated
Ballots will be opened and tabulated on Thursday, January 18, 2001, at 4:00 p.m. in the Main Conference
Room at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590. This process is open to the
general public.
· Results of tabulation
The results of thc tabulation will bc announced following the completion of the tabulation and entered in
thc minutes of thc next Board of Directors meeting on January 23,2001.
IV. Resolution of Disputes
In thc event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is the owner of thc parcel to which the
ballot applies, the District will make such determination from the last equalized assessment roll and any
evidence of ownership submitted to the City Clerk/District SecretarY. The District will be under no duty to
obtain or consider any other evidence as to ownership of property and the District's determination of
ownership will be final and conclusive.
In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is an authorized representative of the
owner of the parcel, the District may rely on the statement on the ballot, signed under penalty of perjury,
that the person completing the ballot is the owner's authorized representative and any evidence submitted
to the City Clerk/District Secretary. The District will be under no duty to obtain or consider any other
evidence as to whether the signer of the ballot is an authorized representative of the owner and the
District's determination will be final and conclusive.
V. General Information
For further information, contact the City Clerk/District Secretary at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box
9033, Temecula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590.
sANTL~GO
DE
STATE HIGHWAY 79
N.T.S.
TRACT NO. 23513
Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 945-010-001,003, 004
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINANCE~__
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
General Manager/Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
November 28, 2000
Tract Map No. 29036 - Service Level B, Proposed Residential Street
Lighting Rates and Charges
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
That the Board of Directors:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND
GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 18,
2001 REGARDING SERVICE LEVEL B RATE AND CHARGES FOR
TRACT MAP NO. 29036 IN ORDERTO ESTABLISH SERVICE LElY. EL B
2001 2002
RATE AND CHARGES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIID, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION.
2. Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return and
Tabulation of the Ballots.
3. Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the
aforementioned process.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the
authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting services to
numerous residential subdivisions within the City of Temecula through Service Level B.
Pursuant to the request of the property owner, staff has initiated proceedings to assume the
responsibility for long-term residential street lighting services within Tract Map No. 29036 beginning
Fiscal Year 2001-2002. On September 26, 2000 and in accordance with Proposition 218, the
Board of Directors adopted the resolution of intention to file the levy report on lots 1-24 within Tract
Map No. 29036. The Notice of Public Hearing was subsequently mailed to the property owner
R: ~smithb\Elecfions~29036 Election\Staff-Notice of Election Il.doc 11115/2000
identifying the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for each affected parcel as follows:
Service Level B $25.68 per parcel
At tonight's Public Hearing, the Board of Directors must hear and consider all objections or protests to
the levy report for Tract Map No. 29036 and the proposed rates and charges. If the property owner
presents a written protest, the Board must reject the proposed fee and abandon any further
proceedings. In this instance, a homeowner's association would be required to assume the street
lighting responsibilities.
However, if the property owner does not submit a written protest against the proposed rates and
charges, the Board of Directors may then adopt the proposed fee subject to an election requiring a
majority approval of the affected property owners. In this instance, the Board of Directors can order
and call an election for January 18, 2001, and authorize staff to proceed with mailing a notice and
ballot to the property owner of Tract Map No. 29036, a copy of which is attached for your review.
Pursuant to the ballot process, staff is also recernmending the approval of the attached Procedures for
the Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots. The ballot procedure explains the process for
completion, return and tabulation of the ballot and will be included as part of the mailed ballot
documents. The ballot can only be completed by the property owner of each parcel. In order to be
counted, the ballot must be completed in compliance with these procedures and returned to the City
Clerk/District Secretary prior to 3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001. The City Clerk/District Secretary will
open the ballot on January 18, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. in the Main Conference Room in City Hall. The
results of the election shall be announced by the City Clerk/District Secretary at that time, and
presented to the Community Services District for formal certification at it's meeting on January 9,
2001.
The Public Hearing for Tract 29036 was scheduled and opened on November 14, 2000. Two of the
Directors, Naggar and Roberts, were absent. President Comerchero was unable to vote due to the
proximity of this tract to his residence. This item was continued until the next regularly scheduled
Board meeting of November 28, 2000. This continuance has changed the date of the election from
January 4, 2001 to January 18, 2001.
The property owner has been notified, by mail, of the continuance and new election date.
FISCAL IMPACT: In the event that the Board of Directors calls for an election, staff will prepare the
notices, ballot and election procedures in-house.
if approved by the property owners, beginning Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the proposed levy of $25.68 per
parcel for Service Level B will generate $616.32 annually for residential street lighting services within
the subdivision. Sufficient funds will be generated to cover the costs of providing residential street
lighting services.
A'I-FACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution Calling and Noticing the Election.
Notice and Ballot Form.
Procedures for Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ballots.
Vicinity Map
R:\smithb\Elections~9036 Election\Staff-Notice of Election Il.doc 11/15t2000
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING
NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 18, 2001 REGARDING
SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT MAP NO. 29036 IN
ORDER TO ESTABLISH SERVICE LEVEL B RATE AND CHARGES BEGINNING
FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XlIID, SECTION 6 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Article XlllD, Section 6 of the
California Constitution, there is hereby called and ordered to be held on January 18, 2001, an
election for the purpose of submitting to the property owners of Tract Map No. 29036 in the City
of Temecula proposed Service Level B Rates and Charges beginning Fiscal Year 2001-02.
Section 2. The notice and ballot to be submitted to the property owners shall be
substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3. The Board of Directors hereby approves the Procedures for the
Completion, Return and Tabulation of Ba lots ( Ballot Procedures ) attached as Exhibit B and
incorporated by this reference and directs such procedures be placed on file in the office of the
Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District and open to public inspection.
Section 4. All ballots must be received by the Secretary of the Temecula
Community Services District no later than 3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001. In all particulars not
recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided in the Ballot
Procedures.
Section 5. The Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District is
hereby authorized to canvass the returns of the election. The officers and staff of the Temecula
Community Services District are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as
may be necessary or appropriate in preparing for and conducting the election.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community
Services District this 28th day of November, 2000.
Jeff Comerchero, President
11/15/;
R:~smithb\Elections~29036 Election\Reso-Notice of Election ll.doc
A'I-rEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA)
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2000-.__ was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, he~d on the 28th day of November, 2000 by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
RSsmithb\ElectionsX29036 Election\Reso-Notice of Election II.doc
11/15/2000
Exhibit A
OFFICIAL BALLOT
TRACT NO. 29036
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL
STREET LIGHTING SERVICES
PROPERTY:
Parcels 1,2,3 and 4 of Parcel Map No. 13784
Recorded May 23, 1980 in Book 78, page 50,
and a portion o£1ots 16,17,18,19,20,26,27 and
28 of Tract No. 20882-3 Recorded in Book
185, Pages 1-7, of Official Records, County
of Riverside, State of Cali£omia, lying within
Rancho California.
OWNER:
Mr. James Howard Didion Sr.
Howard Roberts Development Company
1725 Orange Tree Lane, Suite C
Redlands, CA 92374
YES, I approve of the proposed
annual levy of $25.68 for Service
Level B on the parcels identified on
this ballot.
~ NO, I do not approve of the
proposed annual levy of $25.68 for
Service Level B on the parcels
identified on this ballot.
I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury that I am the record owner, or the authorized representative of
the record owner, of the parcels identified above.
Signature
Print Name
Date
CHECK ONLY ONE BOX. BALLOTS MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK AND RETURNED
TO THE CITY CLERK/DIST~CT SECRETARY AT THE CITY OF TEMECULA, P.O. BOX
9033/43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, 92589-9033 PRIOR TO
3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 18, 2001.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUANCE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF SERVICE LEVEL B,
AND SERVICE LEVEL D RATES AND CHARGES
AGAINST RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 29036
BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2001-02
Pursuant to the request of the property owners of 24 furore residential lots within Tract
Map No. 29036, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has initiated proceedings to
assume responsibility for residential street lighting and refuse collection services within Tract
Map No. 29036 beginning with the 2001-02 fiscal year. In response to this request, and in
accordance with Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD has caused a written report
("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which contains a description
of the parcels within Tract Map No. 29036 and the proposed amounts of the annual rates and
charges for each parcel beginning in Fiscal Year 2001-02.
The TCSD Board of Directors has opened and continued a public hearing at the following
date, time and location on the Report and the proposed imposition of rates and charges within
Tract Map No. 29036:
Date: November 28, 2000
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Location: City Council Chambers
City Hall
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecnla, California 92590
This Public Heating was continued because two Directors were absent, and the President
was unable to vote, due to the proximity of his residence to Tract Map No. 29036. At the
continued public hearing, the City Council and TCSD Board of Directors will hear and consider
all objections or protests, if any, to the Report and to the proposed rates and charges. Any
property owner may file with the City Clerk a written protest against the rates and charges at any
time pr/or to the conclusion of the public hearing.
The TCSD operates under the authority of the Community Services District Law and
provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, street and road
maintenance, and refuse collection services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the
TCSD are the same as those of the City of Temecula, and the City Council also serves as the
Board of Directors of the TCSD.
RSsmithb\ElectionsX29036 Election\Notice of Public Heating Il.doc
I 1/15/2000
Property owners only pay for the services that they actually receive through separate rates
and charges on their property tax bill. The services proposed to be provided to Tract Map No.
29036 by the TCSD are divided into two (2) service levels:
1. Service l,evel l:l - Residential ~qtree/Lights. The revenues from this Service Level
are used to finance the operation, maintenance, utility costs and administration of
residential streetlights. The annual charge is calculated by dividing the total
estimated cost for the fiscal year by the total number of improved residential lots
with residential streetlights. For fiscal year 2001-02, this amount is proposed to
be no more than $25.68 per residential parcel.
2. .qervice l.evel D - Retiree Collection: including Recycling and ,qtreet
S_w~4tix~ The revenues from this Service Level are used to finance the operation
and administration of the refuse collection program, including recycling and street
sweeping services, for all single-family residential homes. The annual charge is
calculated by dividing the total estimated cost of residential service for the fiscal
year by the total number of improved residential lots. For fiscal year 2001-02 this
amount is proposed to be $172.56 per occupied residential parcel.
If you have any questions about this notice or the proposed rates and charges, please do
not hesitate to contact the TCSD at (909) 694-6480.
-2-
990211 110864)0007 rdw I 102106 0
EXHIBIT B
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPLETION, RETURN, AND TABULATION OF BALLOTS
TRACT MAP NO. 29036
I. Completion of Ballots
· Who may complete a ballot
The owner of the parcel to be charged may complete a ballot. As used in these Procedures, the term
"owner" includes the owner's authorized representative. If the owner of the parcel is a partnership, joint
tenancy, or tenancy in common, a ballot may be completed by any of the general partners, joint tenants,
or tenants in common. Only one ballot may be completed for each parcel.
· Duplicate ballots
If a ballot is lost, destroyed or never received, the City Clerk/District Secretary will provide a duplicate
ballot to the owner upon receipt of a request in writing to the City Clerk, at P.O. Box 9033, Temccula,
California, 92589-9033, or otherwise delivered to the City Clerk/District Secretary at 43200 Business Park
Drive, Tcmecula, California 92590. The duplicate ballot will be marked to show the date on which the
ballot was provided and to identify it as a duplicate ballot.
· Marking and signing the ballot
To complete a ballot, the owner of the parcel must (1) mark the appropriate box supporting or opposing the
proposed rate and charge, and (2) sign, under penalty o f perjury, the statement on the ballot that the person
completing thc ballot is the owner of the parcel or the owner's authorized representative. Only one box
may be marked on each ballot. Ballots must be completed in ink.
· Only ballots provided by the District will be accepted
The District will only accept ballots mailed or otherwise provided to owners by thc District. Photocopies,
faxes, and other forms of the ballot will not bc accepted.
II. Return of Ballots
· Who may return ballots
A ballot may be returned by the owner of the parcel or by anyone authorized by thc owner to return thc
ballot.
· Whereto return ballots
Ballots may be mailed to the City Clerk/District Secretary's Off, ce, at P.O. Box 9033, Temecula,
California, 92589-9033, (the District has provided a return postage-paid envelope). Ballots may also be
delivered in person to the City ClerkfDistrict Secretary's Office at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590. Ballots may not be returned by fax.
R:~smithb\Elections~9036 Election\Notice of Election-Procedures.doc 11/15/2000
· When to return ballots
All returned ballots must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary's Office prior to 3:30 p.m. on
January 18, 2001. Thc City Clerk/District Secretary will stamp on the ballot the date of its receipt.
· Withdrawal of ballots
After returning a ballot to the District, the person who signed the ballot may withdraw the ballot by
submitting a written request in person to the C~ty Clerk/D~stnct Secretary at 43200 Bus~ness Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92590. Such request must be received by the City Clerk/District Secretary prior to
3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001. if any ballot has been withdrawn, the person withdrawing the ball°t may
request a duplicate ballot. The City Clerk/District Secretary will retain all withdrawn ballots and will
indicate on the face of such ballots that they have been withdrawn.
IlL Tabulation of Ballots
· Which ballots will be counted
Only ballots, which are completed and returned in compliance with these procedures, will be counted.
Ballots received by the City Clerk/District Secretary after 3:30 p.m. on January 18, 2001 will not be
counted. Ballots, which are not signed by the owner, will not be counted. Ballots with no boxes marked,
or with more than one box marked, will not be counted. Ballots withdrawn in accordance with these
procedures will not be counted.
The City Clerk/District Secretary will keep a record of each duplicate ballot provided to an owner and will
verify, prior to counting any duplicate ballot, that only one ballot has been retumed for the parcel. If a non-
duplicate ballot has been returned, the District will count the non-duplicate ballot and disregard all
duplicate ballots. If only duplicate ballots have been returned, the District will count the earliest provided
duplicate ballot and disregard the later provided duplicate ballots.
· How ballots will be tabulated
Ballots may be counted by hand, by computer or by any other tabulating device.
· Who will tabulate ballots
Ballots will be tabulated by the City Clerk/District Secretary.
· When and where will the ballots be tabulated
Ballots will be opened and tabulated on Thursday, January 18, 2001, at 4:00 p.m. in the Main Conference
Room at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temccula, California, 92590. This process is open to the
general public.
· Results of tabulation
The results of the tabulation will be announced following the completion of the tabulation and entered in
the minutes of the next Board of Directors meeting on January 23, 2001.
IV. Resolution of Disputes
In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is the owner of the parcel to which the
ballot applies, the District will make such determination from the last equalized assessment roll and any
· · The District willbe under no duty to
evidence of ownership submitted to the City Clerk/D~stnct Secretary.
obtain or consider any other evidence as to ownership of property and the District's determination of
ownership will be final and conclusive.
In the event of a dispute regarding whether the signer of a ballot is an authorized representative of the
owner of the parcel, the District may rely on the statement on the ballot, signed under penalty of perjury,
that the person completing the ballot is the owner's authorized representative and any evidence submitted
to the City Clerk/District Secretary. The District will be under no duty to obtain or consider any other
evidence as to whether the signer of the ballot is an authorized representative of the owner and the
District's determination will be final and conclusive.
V. General Information
For further information, contact the City Clerk/District Secretary at (909) 694-6444; by mail, at P.O. Box
9033, Temccula, California, 92589-9033; or in person, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
92590.
VICINITY MAP
TRACT 29036
PROOE~T
LOCATION MAP
(NO SCALE)
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services~.
November 28, 2000
Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail
System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates
as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on March 28, 2000. A
trails questionnaire was mailed out to the residents in mid-September with approximately 450
responses returned. A community workshop was held on September 21, 2000, and a second
community workshop was held on October 28, 2000.
Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be
constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services
Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The
architect and project design committee has completed the schematic design of the project. The
Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2000, and awarded a contract to RJM
Design Group on July 11, 2000, for the Phase II of the Design Contract.
Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of a sports complex to be
constructed on the City's northwest sports park site. Statements of Qualifications were received on
February 16, 2000, and interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March 28, 2000. A
design contract was awarded to RJM Design Group at the May 23, 2000, Board of Directors
meeting. The first sub-committee will be meeting on November 7, 2000.
Long Canyon Creek Park is nearing the final stages of the 90-day maintenance period. This 3.15
acre park site has a tot lot, picnic amenities, open turf area and a parking lot. A dedication
ceremony is planned for December 12, 2000, 3:00 PM.
The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City
Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and
specifications for the Temecula Public Library. LPA is currently working on construction documents
for submittal for first plan check.
R:~Z1GLE RGLXD E PTRPT~0010.doc November 3, 2000
The tot lot replacement project at Rancho California Sports Park is scheduled for completion at the
end of October 2000. The project includes the replacement of the rubberized surfacing and
replacement of the playground structure with a new jungle themed Little Tykes play structure.
On June 15, 2000, staff released an RFQ requesting a Statement of Qualifications to prepare a
feasibility study for the development of a Water Park. A contract was awarded to the Natelson
Company at the September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting, for the preparation of the Water Park
Feasibility Study. The first sub-committee meeting was held on October 24, 2000. The consultant is
currently intercept surveys. A committee meeting is scheduled for November 27, 2000.
Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum interior space planning, exhibit design, fabrication,
construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on October 17, 2000.
Staff will begin negotiating with the top ranked firm. Staff anticipates bringing forward a
recommendation to award a design contract in the next 30 days.
The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities,
as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division
assists in all aspects of Citywide special events.
The Recreation staff is currently coordinating the Annual Tree Lighting Ceremony to be held
December 1, 2000, 6:00 PM, at the Temecula Duck Pond, and directly following at 7:30 PM, the
Annual Temecula's Electric Light Parade; Breakfast with Santa and Snow Frolic; and, Holiday Lights
and Festive Sights. In addition, the Recreation Division is currently putting together their
Winter/Spring edition of the Guide to Leisure Activities. The Recreation Division continues to
program classes, activities and excursions at all City recreation facilities.
R:kZIG L ERG~DEPTRPT~0010,doc November 3, 2000
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOVEMBER 14, 2000
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:49
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLLCALL
PRESENT:
3 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Pratt, Stone
ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBER: Naggar, Roberts
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 17, and 24, 2000.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerche~:o moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Agency Members Naggar and Roberts who were absent.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comment.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comment.
R:\Minutes\l 11400 1
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:50 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, November 28, 2000, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Ron Roberts, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\l 11400 2
RDA
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR__~.., j
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOF~"
TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM:
John Meyer, Redevelopment Director
DATE:
November 28, 2000
SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report
Attached for your information is the monthly report as of November 28, 2000 for the RedevelopmeH!.
Department.
HOUSING
First Time Homebuyers Pro,qram
Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 00-01. One loan has closed for $24,000.
Residential Improvement Programs
The program budget for FY 00/01 is $250,000 and $85,000 has been funded.
Request for Qualifications - Affordable Housing
Agency staff is negotiating with two development partners to develop 75 -100 affordable housing
units within the Pujol neighborhood. Staff is reviewing preliminary plans.
Request for Qualifications - Senior Housing
Agency staff is negotiating with a development p,artner to rehab 96 units for affordable senior
housing.
Request for Qualifications - Old Town CommuniW Theater
The architect, Fisher Merriman Sehgal and Yanez Inc., has conducted stakeholder and community
interviews and is completing the schematic phase of the project. Preliminary floor plans and
elevations will be ready in approximately 30 days.
R:~SYERSKW~ONTHLLY~report, nov00.doc
Old Town Trading Post
Agency staff is handling the acquisition and relocation of tenants of the Trading Post property.
Escrow closed on August 25, 2000.
Facade Improvement/Non-Conforming Si~n Pro.qram
The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed:
Mad Madeline's
Front Deck and Paint
· Butterfield Inn
Paint and Sign
Grace Garden Gift Shop
Signs
The following facade improvements are underway:
· The Country Goose
Signs
· Romans Sew & Vac
Signs
Rooster Creek Crossing
Signs
Circle K Center in Old Town
The Redevelopment Agency has negotiated assistance for the rehabilitation of the center.
Plans, which include western-style architectural enhancements, are in the design phase,
Old Town Promotions/Marketing
The Agency is sponsoring Dickens Christmas in Old Town from November 24 through
December 23. Activities include performances from local school choirs and jazz bands, local
dance academies; youth performances by Countesses and Noblemen; Santa at Butterfield
Square; and the Broadway Bound Performers are just some of the scheduled family
entertainment and activities.
R:\SYE RSK'~MONTHLLY~report,nov00.doc
ITEM 15
APPROVAL
CiTY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE
CiTY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
November 28, 2000
Temecula Ridge Reconsideration
RECOMMENDATION: Reconsider previous denial of the Temecula Ridge project.
BACKGROUND: On October 10, 2000 the City Council heard PA99-0317 (Appeal of the
Temecula Ridge Development Plan). The Temecula Ridge project consists of 246 multiple family
two and three story units with a pool, clubhouse, workout building and tot lot on 20.88 acres
generally located on the south side of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road. After hearing
testimony, both in support and opposition, the City Council denied PA99-0317 and directed the City
Attorney to bring back Findings for Denial to the City Council meeting on October 24, 2000.
At the October 24, 2000 meeting, the Council again heard additional testimony and recommended
that the item be continued to allow the Council time to meet with the developer to discuss a re-
design of the project. Since that meeting, the developer has met with some of the Council
members and the following changes are being proposed by the developer:
*A reduction in the number of units from 246 units to 220. Since the traffic generation rate
of multi-family is less than that of single family units, this would yield the same number of
trips as a single family project at the lowest end of the permitted density range;
*Removal of the third floor from all Type I buildings which will result in an additional 32, 2
bedroom, 2 bath units;
*The addition of 6 additional 3 bedroom, 2 story units;
*Reduction in the size of the recreation center to accommodate the tot lot at this location;
and
R:\DEBBIE\staffrpt.cc.kading.doc
I
*Lowering the elevation of the site by 4 feet at the back of the site to reduce potential view
impacts.
The site plan will remain almost identical and will still maintain 43% open space. In
addition, staff has received a copy of a letter addressed to A.G. Kading from the Temecula
Valley Unified School District wherein the District has committed to providing an additional
bus due to the additional students generated by the Temecuia Ridge project. This bus will
not only service the students living in the Temecula Ridge project, but also students living in
the surrounding developments who currently have to walk to the bus stop at the "Duck
Pond" to board a school bus.
FISCAL IMPACT: N~A
ATTACHMENTS: Letter from the Temecula Unified School District dated November 13, 2000
R:\DEBBIE\staffrpt.cc.kading.doc
2
9096957341
TEMECULA VALLEY
November 13, 2000
VIA FA.C~,IMILE AND U.S. MAIL
11/13 '00 18:18 NO.570 02/03
BOARD OF £L1UCA1 ION
A.G. Kading
35411 Paseo Viento
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624
RE: Temecula Ridge Apartment Project
Dear A.G. Kading:
Thank you for contacting my office to review yoLIr proposed project and the impact it might have
on student safety and transportation.
While the Temecula Valley Unified ,qchool District has not taken a formal position on the proposed
project, there are several impacts the project will have on the DLstrict.
The elementary students residing in the proposed apartment complex would attcTLd Vail
Elementary School. Although the project is within the walking distance for students attending Vail
Elementary ~:hool, because of unsafe walking routes, the District will provide bus transportalion.
The District ct~rrently has a Vall Elementary School bus stop at the "Duck Pond" that serves the
students of existing multi-family residences in this area. The additional students living in your
proposed apartment complex, induding the existing student population, will result in the need for
the District to acquire an additional bus.
The proposed Temecula Ridge Apartment Project will resdt in the cormection of Moraga Road
with Via Los Colinas. This connection will facilitate bus traffic flow in the area and will allow the
District to place bus stops at other locations than the '[Z~ck Pond."
ultimately, safe walking routes need to be provided to eliminate costly District provided
transportation to an area within walking distance to Vail Elementary School. This can occur by
the construction of off-site walkways along Rancho California Road to Cosmic Drive. An
alternative would be the construction of walkwayS connecting existing sidewaLLs along Ynez Road
and Rancho Vista Drive. The completion of these walkways will provide a continuous walkway
from existing and propo~d projects to Vail Elementary School, resulting in a safe route, thereby
elilninating the need for bus transportation.
31350 Rancho Vista RoacI ! Tnmecob. CA 92592 1 (909)67r~-2661
9096957341 11/13 '00 18:19 N0.570 03/03
Temecula Ridge Apartment Project
November 13, 2000
Page 2 of 2
Your assistance, as well as Lhat of the City of Temecula, in getting these, necessary walkway
connections in.stalled, will be greatly appreciated.
Busine.,~ Sttpport Services
JO:ls (ms\ ww \ memo~01\Tcmc~culaRid§rAp~rojectl 11300)
CC:
David B. Allmcn, Superintendent
Governing Board
Shawn Nelson, City Manager, City of Temecula
City Council, City of Temecula
ITEM 16
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC~
CiTY MANAGER /Z~)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council ~
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~.~¢--'
November 28, 2000
Consideration of Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) -
Councilmember Pratt
RECOMMENDATION: Consider steps as recommended by Councilmember Pratt in his
letters of October 10, 2000 (ETCP Plan) and November 6, 2000.
BACKGROUND: At your October 10, 2000 meeting, Councilmember Pratt provided City
Council and staff with a report entitled Emergency Traffic Cimulation Plan (ETCP).
Councilmember Pratt requested that this report be placed for City Council consideration at your
October 24, 2000 meeting. This item was continued at the suggestion of Councilmember Pratt
to your November 28, 2000 meeting. Since that time Councilmember Pratt has submitted
additional items for consideration in a letter dated November 6, 2000. A copy of the October 10
and November 8 letters are attached for your information and consideration.
The October 10 proposal contains 19 detailed points. The November 8 letter contains several
additional recommendations. If implemented, a number of the points would involve significant
expenditures of resources - staff time or direct expenditures. Recently, the City Council
adopted the Operating Budget for FY 2000-01 as well as the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) for FY 2001-05. Both of these policy documents identify the City Council's focus and work
plan for the current fiscal year. Because of the challenging projects and work programs that
have been identified in the Operating Budget and CIP, significant additional assignments,
projects or work programs could affect the completion of various programs and projects in the
City's CIP projects and other work programs.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Potential implementation costs if Council wishes to
implement steps outlined in this plan.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter and ETCP Plan dated October 10, 2000
2. Letter dated November 8, 2000
Tue.~y. O~d)er lO. 2000
City
c~ s~
CitF Council
City of Temecula
43~74 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subjec~ Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP)
Dear Shawn, Members ~ the City Staff and Members of the City Council:
This is a brief summary of five pa&es of the at~ched statement I have a pnnted coPies for the
record and for Council and Staff reaew. I have cop]es for the press for their reXnew. Citizens may
request a copy from our staff or contact me by ernml ~ and I will attach a copy.
on tt, ply
If the Council wishes the entire report may be read publicly by the City Clerk.
L_mai Temecula Traffic has not and cannot be mifiqated throuqh the use of
professional t~'affic consultantsl
Accorcling to DMV statistics the last 8 months (.lanua~/, 2000 through August 2000) have
· 4,4`12 registereq units. The number
seefl the Temecula City vehicular traffic increased by
of afl/cs, motorcycles and trucks and grow at a rate of 6.86 vehicles per residence
(44'12/543 Building permits). We now have (August, 2000) 53,423 registered vehicles
(DMV) equivalent to a line of vehicles - Bumper to Bumper -from Temecula to Santa
Bart)ara a dishance of '150 miles. This is at~olutely unsoceptaBle!
The imCementation of this plan - Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) - to 'iump
start' the relief of traffic congestion, and in addition provide the Planning Department w/th a
'l~ea~e~' to have a more equitable and ordedy review of Spec/ftc Plans for the c/fizen as
well as the developer.
THE COUNCIL MUST IMPLEMENT AN EMERGENCY TRAFFICICIRCULATION
SOLUTION THAT WiLL CONSERVE OPEN SPACE AND REDUCE TRAFFIC
CONGESTION - NOT A DEFENCE OF POLICIES THAT HAVE MADE TEMECULA THE
,,RESIDENTIAL DESTINATION" OF sOUTHWI/ST RIVERSIDE COUNTYI
Thc:we are 19 detailed points to the ETC;P. A 'pause' for preparation is supporteq by
California code Section 65858 (a).
Respectfully,
Sam Pratt
Civ~ ~ee~ No. 7697
S~ ~'~ No. 650
ALBERT S. PRATt
Sim2e 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula. CA 92591
(Emil: sampratt ~(-~mxicro. corn)
(909)699-8689
Tuesday, October 10, 2000
Shawn Nelson
City Manager
City Staff
City Counci~
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Ddve
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) - (Attached are two timely ext3iblts: Los
Angeles Times article, Octopar 6, 2000, and a Traffic StagnatJen Solution presentation I made
on October 13, 1999, from a field traffic count, at the comer of Winchester Road (SR79N) and
Margarita Road - The Mail)
Dear Shav~, Members of the City Staff and Members of the City Council:
The follOwing statements address a solution to a major traffic emergency for our city, the
cievelopers and the citizens. I have a [xinted Statement for the record and for your review. I
have copies for the press for their review. Citizens may request a copy from our staff or contact
me by emall ~ and i will attach a copy on reply.
Temecula and Murrieta are one community with two governments. Together we am the
clominant citizen group in the Temecula Valley. The ETCP will not be succes~ui without
Mumeta's citizen involvement. Temecula must, initially, lead the way!
According to DMV statistics the last 8 months (January, 2000 through August 2000) have seen
the Temecula City vehicular traffic increased by 4,412 registered units. The number of autos,
motomycles and trucks and grows at a rate of 6.86 ven~ctes per readence (4412/643 bufid~ng
permits). We now have (August, 2000) 53,423 registered vehicles (DMV) equivalent to a line of
vehicles - bumper to bumper - from Temecula to Santa Bart3a~a a distance of 150 miles. This is
absolutely unacceptable! It also gives me the opportunity to voice my concerns over
Traffic/Circulation as it affects the effectiveness of the GMP, and the health, safety and welfare
of our citizens, (not negotiable) wl3ich includes preschool plus K-12 children, adults and retirees.
http:/,.;;;..::.ci.temecula.ca.us/homepaqelGrowthMqmt/actionPlan.htm)
Local Temecula Traffic has not and ~a..ot be mitigated tt~rou~h the use of profeS~onal traffic
coosultants! (An EIR -Environmental Impact Report - c~alienge to a traffic mitigation plan
based on the cumulative traffic of the City of Temecuia may make public funding of public va3rks
improvements imP°sable without legislative action or court rutings. An EIR legislated to protect
the citizens has been diluted through the courts - it must, ag~n, be a clooument for the citizen
and their environment).
The issuance of fourteen (14) new alcoholic beverage licenses this year, 2000, is not good
health, safety and welfare news for traffic congestion of the citizen.
ALBERT S. PRATT
Sittce 1919
40470 Brbaon Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Email: sampratt~cro.com)
(909) 699-8689
tn pursuing sales tax revenue through vehicle sales we have degraded Temecula~s environment
through vehicle sales, ts Temecula in a position where only more sates tax revenue will allow it
to survive?
We no longer have the luxury of five year plans to mitigate traffic with the possibility of 15,000
more new care in Temecula. Little internal traffic circulation is physically possible east of 1-15!
Should the present rate of vehicle sales continue we would have over 100,000 vehicles at some
point on our present streets!
We have nowa grOVang traffic cimulation emergency affecting the citizen's safety and the
success of the GMP. Citizen's perception of traffic congestion fuels their demand for reduced
residential density in addition to their desire for open space. Physical construction - additional
structure widening, bridges, ramps and other future plans will not only be too little to late, but too
expensive. The available funding, for major newl~ai'fic mitigating construction should be used
for other community demands. (City of Temecula Web Site - http://wvwv, cl.temecula.ca.us0
The uncertainties of this growing problem have directly affected every person's health, safety
and welfare. Three major residential development projects pending approval have grown into
uncertainties for the developer with the citizen perception that reduced residential density will
cure the traffic congestion of Temecula. It will certainly help, but is not the solution - we are!
The concept of constn.~ng the Western Bypass to relieve industrial traffic to the ~ (now over
10 years from initial planning) is an urgem immediate need if our w~em industrial area is to
avoid gddlock (and, of course, further expansion. Costly north and south interchanges are too far
in the future to relieve traffic congestion. Past correspondence outlines my support of the CIP -
Capital Improvement Report - for various infrastructure improvements planned east of 1-15 as
va3tl as the Western Bypass, but not $200 million + to support work week transient traffic west of
1-15.
The Council and Staff have been informed of my opposition to the Rrm Street Bridge as not
being cost effective, it is also a dangerous life threat using a residential area access for the
traffic relief of transient v~3rkers and paid for by the citizens.
It is my intention to agendize by October 24, 2000, the Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan
(ETCP) concept with immediate implementatio, n ?f. those parts of the plan in which resources are
made available. Other creative solutions, m~n~m~zJnq capital expenditures, to further enhance
and expedite this plan are welcome from Coundl, Staff and our citizens:
1. During the five day v,ork week (holidays excluded) a motorized officer will be positioned
dudng the afternoon rush hours (3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) at the following intersections:
Rancho California Road at Diaz, Jefferson, Ynez and Margarita. Highway 79S at
Margarita, Pala Road and the intersection with 1-15. Winchester Road (SR79N) at
Margarita, Ynez and Jefferson. This will.require 10 motorized officers to monitor the
possibility of serious traffic aCOdents due to congestion, and allow no trucks over 10,000
Lbs. GVW.
2. Added speed limit signs shall be posted not less than I per each direction and at the
intersections, bet~w~ signed or signaled intersections and all arterials. Below each
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula. CA 92591
(Email: sampran ~C~micro.com)
(909) 699-8689
Civil F:z~ No. 7697
Smss:mz~ r.n ~ame~ No. 650
s~ limit ~gn ~all ~ a ~all ~gn ~ng, "O~y t~e ~' or "Save a ~fe", etc. (our
~[ ~ild~ ~ll ~ave ~ve i~s). On the ~ ~Ha~ Jn ~
~ t~e ~ ~ limit ~g~ ~ll ~ ~i~ ~e s~ limit.
3. p~anem R~r 8~ Tmil~ ~ll ~ ~an~[y m~tion~ m i~als on our
m~n ~ afl.als, a~ mnflom ~oning on ~ema~ on ~nfla~ annals (~am~e:
~lle M~, ~a ~)
4. Levy a ~ty ~ Tem~la ~e fine ~il i~ at the time of the n~nng ~ the moving
vi~i~ ~f~ t~e j~e ~ ~.~, in ~flition to the e~ng t~e fin~. This revenue
to ~ ~t ~e fun~ mafle ~aJla~e ~mm o~w ~ie funding ~u~,
~ ~ 8~, a~ an imm~ime mv~ue ~um to ~p~ the ~CP ~ ~l as a
mmng ~m~ to ~e mnni~ ~ ~ lig~m, mop ~g~, s~i~, r~
en~nge~, et~.
5. An in~ive ~mm for ~ mom~ a~ ~z~s ~aflng the rifle ~un~ "~l houm"
a~ ~e m~i~ a~ ~ h~ ~ t~e ~i~ ~u~ng ~e fiv~y
~mmi~on, ~t~ t~e ~SD~ ~ ~Y a unito~ o~r, our Tem~la ~le
m~gff, a~ a re~ive ~ ~e RTA ~[I ~ asg~ ap~r, at
~m~, in ~e ~i~ ~ Tem~la Gm~ K th~ ~2. The ~ ~ll ~ to ~e
~ive a~ t~e ~v~ ~ ~e ~ ~m ~is ~mm ~ll '~e up" to
t~er familia.
7. T~is ~mm ~ll, ~ a minimum, ~tne value of ~e ~anng m all fim~ i~[y to
minimize ~e ~g~Jon, ~ (~ v~i~ in t~e ~ty), r~ fff ~ limits,
Jm~ve i~af~c ~l~on ana, in my o~ni~, fl~z~ ~ai~i~ in the ~mm is t~e
only ~e W~ an~ f~um mJtig~ion to all~ n~ ~d~ial ~Jon unaff
t~e GMP. I ~ ~e imOem~on ~ this '~e ~u~ion" ~ me ~c~ne
of ~rt~e mitJgmion f~ure a~ the ~ive ex~i~ ~ our
8. ImOem~ a ~i~ ~ ~ on ~ ~ ~ the ~ ~ 2:~ a.m a~ 6:~ a.m.
dufi~ t~e ~y ~R ~th ~idays ex~.
9. Am~ our G~eml ~an to m~ garages 1or n~ r~s ~ ~ othe~ to
a m~mum of a ~r ga~e. This ~ll ~ a fuflh~ fl~ to ~ ~ion.
~0. S~al a~ly~s of t~e r~u~ morning an~ aflem~n t~c from ~ ail ~igh ~l
~ ~. Pmm~e me ~ety an~ ~nv~i~ of our ~le ~s ~i~ t~her ~m TVUSD
~ to fuahW minimize me a~J~o~l m~ing a~ ~em~n ~ ~e n~
gene~ ~ mothem fl~ving t~er ~Jl~r~ to ~l an~ return ~y augm~ing their
~ ~ tin--ion m the "~ll ~ou~'.
~2. ~USD ~ our ~ilfl~ ~ mu~ ~ ~th t~em to UeveJoD '~e ~l~ng
on an i~m em~y an~ ~ane~ ~s, in~u~ing 8top ~gn~ a~
i~e~o~ Jf r~uir~ for ~ety of ~r ~il~ren. An initia~ all--on of $~,~ bY the
Ci~ ~un~l to "jump ~afl" t~Js ~mm. This is a small am~ to ~e a life a~ to
~ our GMP.
~3. ~e ~e a~oflz~ hun~r~s ~ ~ou~nfls ~ ~ollam of f~lJty an~ a~gn muUies for
r~e~i~ a~ ~ltuml ~j~s. ~th our ~e~ and 0~n0 t~e ~s are ~ u~ng
g~ ju~gme~ in ~e~ing u~l our ~tizens are ~1 a~i~ of t~e im~ on tn~r
~imnm~? At this ~age in Tem~la's ~evelopme~ any ~)~,
~ltuml, in~u~flal an~ ~mm~ ~ll e~e~e t~e Uang~ to the a~z~ -
ALBERT $. PRATT
St~we 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Emaik sampran ~cro.com)
(909) 699-8689
Cadifarum R~=
Civil F~ No. 7697
~autXu~al ~ Ho. 650
Today's traffic may make them a danger to visit. We recently approved heady $30,000
for a feaabllity study for a water park-? Traffic congestion and safety is certainly a higher
priedty!
14. This initial allocation of $100,000 is to be followed by permanent funding through grants.
new DIIms and an add-on tax of $300 for every new vehicle sold in Temecula, and at the
present rate of vehicle sales is neady $2,000,000 (20 new busses). Use of private
funding sources will be mandato~ for continuing effective traffic control - at least for a
portion of the funds. My professional engineenng efforts toward private funding have
generated hundreds of letters with state agencies and the auto/petroleum industry. This
information is available to our city to aSast in setting new era private transportation
funding sources.
15. We have to implement the requirement for affordable housing. One of the many
problems is the concem over the quality of the person at the economic level to qualify
and become our neighbor. This must not be a concern as we all have the possibility in
o~' life times to require public aSastance. Does this make us any less of an exemplary
citizen?
16. In addition to the planned affordable new housing existing housing coming on the market
through repossessions or other economic owner or developer situations that the city
purchase and refurbish, if necessary, these houses in the many city neighborhoods they
become available and place on the affordable housing market with every priodty to this
in need. This will diversify affordable hOUang throughout our fine city.
17. Amend the City Code to bring the highest standards of the CC&R's as a further incentive
to citizens participation in the trefficJ circulation issue. HOA's can volunteer monitoring
in cooperation with Code Enforcement.
18. C~Uzen perception of the Council and Staff is that they must fight for their dghts. This
does not make the citizens "happy campers" to understand and cooperate in
controversial pmgrems. We have grO~ag discontent with our City Government. A
Council and Staff continuing program that finds weys and means to satisfy citizen's
dgttts is to be formed using all available city resources - including City Attorney legal
opinions to exhaust all remedies before the interests of developers or other sPecial
interest groups are addressed. This policy will give all spe(~al interest groups that 5,~at
is best for the citizen is what is best for the City".
19. We must "Market" our plan to the citizer~s - they are the solution!
The implementatio~ of this plan - Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan (ETCP) - to "jump
start' the relief of t~,l'fic congestion, and in addition provide the Planning Department with a
"breather" to have a more equitable and ordedy review of spe~fic Plans for the citizen as
well es the developer. Ordinances even ballot m-~m~res may be required to have a total
effective enforceable plan. The required emerqency measures will be executed after
CounOl approval of the ETCP.
By the November 28, 2000 - proposed for full execution of the ETCP there will b 919 more
registered vehicle on Temecula's streets and an approximate total of 54423 exceeding our
total population. This is truly an emergency!
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Email: sampran ~(~ivmicro.com)
(909)699-8689
The proposed 'pause" is supported by California ~ California Code, Section 65858 (a): "-
- - the legislative body, to protect the public safety, health and w~fare, may abol3t as an
urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses wi~ich may be in conflict with a
contemplated general plan, sPeCific plan, or zoning proposal whi~ the legislative body,
planning commission or the planning department is considenng or studying or intends to
study within a reasonable time."
1. I am requesting the above 19 suggestions be placed on the October 24, 2000
CounCil agenda to allow time for the Council and Staff to mviow FROM October 10,
2000.
2. If this emergency plans, with w~come upgrades, is approved by the Council. Staff
will coml31ete their review and p~ovide an amendment to the Growth Management
Plan for Council approva~ on the November 14, 2000 agenda. (Grow~ Management
Action Ran, Section 4. Traffic Circulation System Improvements)
3. Staff - will prepare a detailed plan of executing the emergency plan, in~uding
named Staff pemonnel responsible for emergency implementation of the approved
plan f~- Council approval on November 28, 2000. "go!" is 49 clays after October
10, 2000. Hardly a deterrent to the issuing of approved new building permits and
unden~ey.-residential construction.
THE COUNCIL MUST RESOLVE CITIZEN DISCONTENT WITH AN EMERGENCY
TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION SOLUTION -W1TH CITIZEN PARTICIPATION -THAT WILL
CONSERVE OPEN SPACE (Councilman Sam Pratt, "Perspectives, October, 2000),
http:lNvww, ci.temecula.ca.us/cityhall/mayor ccJprattJperspectives.htm AND REDUCE TRAFFIC
CONGESTION - NOT A DEFENCE OF POLICIES THAT HAVE ALREADY MADE TEMECULA
THE 'RESIDENTIAL DESTINATION" OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY! (Mayor Pro
Tern Jeff Comercaem, "Perspectives', October, 2000)
http://www, cLtem~',,m ca.us/cityhalllmayor cc/comemhero/pempectives, tttm -
TEMECULAJMURRIETA AND THE VALLEY IS 'WHERE IT'S AT!"
Respectfully, Sam Pratt
Tougher
Ddving
· Travel,: Su~,e~ finds
Southland motorist~ face
longer dai/¥ commu~.
:~ r~n promo~ u~
of~r~is~ bu~ a~
u~r~five t~p~t ~urc~.
~R~l,~, .
Seuti~land fr~ways ex~nded to
· ~, ~e:~ m n~y ~mpi]~ fig.
:ng home, ~ 41-~n~ ~ttle, ~
~ ~ ~ays and ~a~e ~,,-~,~ - -
r~i~ eaq~, bu~s aa~ other
t~.,~d a re.ri rek. as~ bv
Th~ re.on ex~:L~ to add fi 7
~, ~vec~ ~tl tra~ to a~rk alone
~a su~,cy of 2.925 drivers in .~x
} ~' Orar~ge County COmmute~
r~ked '
lac~ c:n ~th their d~'~ t~ ~
i
- The.~.'~ ~ reai pro'o!er-,, bore.'
~uthenty spo~:.,~man Gea-ge Urrh
~o. of the :'e~o~. "R~s sk P,~ed.'
of Riae~re ~e~ice~. ac~n6wl-
~ rank~ k~ m d~ver bmppmess.
evt~ngs &c,m %%ri:ufa ~ ~n ~-
Dutiag the ~hr~ y~a~ ~e has
made ',h~: i~, :he ~:re~s
m~-asi~Kl7 co~nded by
he ~co~t~ on ~e ma~
omg on their ~ pao~," ~
And r~e ~lif~a~on of ~ utf-
a~ v-emc]~. "They make it
m~. ~al. :~you~v.
mga Toyu~ ~r~, you f~ like
you could ~ c~ like a bug."
Stre~s ~ e~nencea "taUiy
often" or "very of~n" among
T~ ~,~y f~d o~y a ~t de-
chae in ttm ~vem~ ~ver's
trav~ ~me ~ a {;~fficant
a ~'~(tf
"! pJt.¥ t~e man who ha.~ to dm,e in caum~ ~ome p~ie ~ move or
Uny." 2~d ~o3 Angele~ attorney- ~ou; o[ eye~ 10 r~n~n~
- ~ , ~. - . ' · ' h~./o~ho~
fey :o :he WeHt~Ade. and
ak~'~, who is able to avoid that
bottleneck, needed no
~tte~ wc~. }le h~ ~en
escaJatm~ congesdon whde
ttave~ng a tr~n~llar c~cZt from
~ ~a~lv ~{ an ho~
bu, ~ mmme~ duri~g the
mornm~
Friday ar 5:39 can ~
Arr..hired[ Anthony Moretfi, ~
~Io~ his ~y~om ~i~ to
M~Wfl~re ~trict in ~ An-
gel~. said ~s o~ drive has "a)-
m~t ~s~ over ~at thm~ho~,"
m ~e ~ he ~1~. ~u~eef
Ute ia!l ~h~l ~m~r and
~ing b~ st~.
Even before ~e at,kc, conges-
:i~ ~d gto~ ~rcennblv ov~'
the ~t f~ yearn. NOw h~
"it's ~m~: ~ole. ~. the
~vera~ w~ks. ~t's as bad as it's
~er ~n."
Mo~ettF~ ~vo ~ gone from
a~ ~ n~u~ m a~uC 70. Half
the time he carpo~i~, using the
mend lane on t.ne !lO Freeway. But
wt~l~ he ~ivea alone, he avo:~s t~
f~y, e~ though it's ~m mo~
di~t route.
'~o ~ke the Har~r P~w~y hy
yo~lf is pretty m~ ~t ~ ~
Not eve~ ~ea e~nence~
~-your4aee s~res~, in mo~ rural
ALBERT S. PRATT
"Since 1919"
40470 Brixton Cove
Temecula, CA 92591
(Emil: ~mpratt(~ctimes. net)
(909) 699-8689
Califcama ReS~iar
Civil ~gm~r No. 7697
Sm,m~al Engm*e~' No. 650
October, 13, 1999
TRAFFIC STAGNATION
PEOPLE POWER
"RIDE SHARING"
TRAFFIC COUNT WINCEIESTER ROAD:
(Frequent) 15 CARS - ONE (1) PASENGER PER CAR (100%)
"TYPICAL" daily traffic pattern on Winchester Road~ Ynez Road~ Rancho
and
12 CARS - 9 VvTI'H (1) PASSENGER - 3 WITH (2) PASSENGERS (80%)
6 CARS WITH (2) PASSENGERS PER CAR - 1 CAR WITH (3) PASSENGERS
PER CAR (47%)
i~ ;;~~ THE ULTIMATE "RI-DE
~ SHARING"
~:_ ~r (Save $5000 per year per car - ACSC $6000/Yr)
ALL OF THE ABOVE 15 PASSENGERS trRT.4 Busses Temecula) CAN RIDE THE
BUS (LESS THAN l%/car)
~ov O~ O0 04:03p Sam Pratt, Councilman (909) 308-1289 p.1
(]vi1 EuSin ~'r No. '769/
Sa'uctmal Engln ~.~ No, 650
^LBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Bfixtoa Covo
Temeeula, CA 92591
(Email: samplatt~nctimesJ~et)
(909) 699-116119
Wednesday, November 08, 2000
Shawn Nelson
City Manager
City Staff
City Council
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: Review of Annual Operating Budget - Dated July 1, 2000
Reference: Emergency Traffic Circulation Plan 101000, Request to Delay
Approval of ClP 062700, Request to Delay Approval of ClP 060400, Capital
Improvement Program Summary 060200 - 052600 and Amending ClP to fund
ETCP.
Dear Shawn, Members of the City Staff and Members of the City Council:
I have reviewed the recently received Annual Operating Budget - July 1,
2000. It is a professionally, well prepared, document. I note that missing from this
document is a statistical page (included in past reports) with reference to
population, progressive population growth and other factors which briefly
summarize the physical state of Temecula and its government. In my opinion, this
makes for an "arms length" review of these items in which a citizen is not able to
analyze a document with this detail and can see the where the city is at a glance.
I am opposed to the following:
1. Page 6, "Utilize the 'fast track' process to provide one-stop
streamlined development permitting'. Clearly, the recent
statements made by the citizens before the Council is directed to
"anything" but a "fast track'. This policy must be revised to a 'slow
track" compatible with the GMP.
2. Page 6, "PROVIDE ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE
CONCURRENT WITH DEVELOPMENT". I am not in agreement
with many of the proposed infrastructure improvements directed
Hov. O~ O00~:03p Sam Pratt, Councilman (909) 308-1289 p.2
Al,BERT S. PRATT
Since 19_19
40470 Brixton Covo
Temecnla, CA 92591
(Email: samprattl~ncfmosmot)
(909) 699-8699
toward mitigating traffic. I have previously submitted in writing my
opposition.
Page 9, 'Conclusion - ;' ~' The budget was constructed by utilizing a
conservative approach in projecting revenues and corresponding
. expenditures'. I take exception to this statement as it applies to
specific infrastructure improvements delineated in attached past
correspondence.
I requested to be placed on the agenda an Emergency Traffic Circulation
Plan (ETCP), which at my request was continued. I consider this emergency
exists and an acceptable ETCP prepared, before the Council grants any further
Specific Plan approvals. Careful review of the ETCP indicates a time schedule
which with intense effort, will on a continuing basis provide the citizens of
Temecula full knowledge of our present traffic situation and their part along with
commerce and industry in its solution - the cost and the immediate steps required
- however painful. The approximately six weeks proposed for planning and initial
execution is reasonable and appropriate.
It is my opinion that we can implement my RTA - ATR bus transportation
plan (a minimum system estimated initial service for 1000 citizens), of May 24,
2000 (until a more efficient plan evolves) at the first of next year (initial emergency
financing will be required by amending the 2001-2005 CIP, Priority I Section until
those responsible for added growth participate). The school bus element can be
integrated at a later date. This will demonstrate to the citizens of Temecula that
we have a positive traffic mitigation program in place and operating to support
responsible growth - the next step is theirs - cooperation with solutions!
The cost of additional public transportation required - equal to one bus per
1000 citizens - must be absorbed by all new development. New development will
provide more density and exacerbate present traffic conditions. The Pechanga
Casino must be a major contributor in the initial phase.
I suggest the Police Department, Traffic Commission and the Chamber of
Commerce take the lead in an initial solution. The Police Department (Step 1) set
up and maintains an intense moving violation and school traffic-monitoring
program with penalties and incentives. The Traffic Commission (Step 2) work
with H.O~.'s and citizens through neighborhood workshops and the Chamber of
Commerce (Step 3) accept the responsibility and promptly marshal the
N~.OB O0 04:04p Sam Pratt, Counci)man (909) 30B-12BS p.3
ALBERT S. PRATT
Since 1919
40470 Bfixt~a Covo
Tomocula, CA 92591
(Email: sami, ratt ctimosJ ot)
(909) 699-8689
Ca//fomla R~imafim:
(Ysvi] ~,,~ N~ '7697
Stmctnral Fn~ e~ N~ 650
considerable talents of the residential developer, industrial and business
community - further traffic congestion can only damage their markets and
become an increasing barrier to industrial'~rnployment - isolating commeme
through congestion.
Usc thc present northwest Tcmecula city property area (formerly used for
the tractor race) for an all-industrial and commercial employees 'park and ride"
west of 1-15, using Temecula provided shuttle buses to and from work. Access
the area from the Western Bypass.
This-disregard-for-our-lo6al-traffic lavvsandlack-of-driver-6ourtesy are
exacerbating the immediate traffic situation. I suggest when a citizen sees a car
with two or more passengers they "honk' twice and show a ~thumbs up' this will
enhance ride sharing and reduce congestion. When a moving violation is
observed, speeding in particular, rolling stops at stop signs, running stop lights,
etc. that you "honk" three times and show a ~thumbs downm. This will enhance
driving courtesy and safety, it is a start! Let's have some imaginative ideas to
solve the problem of our dangerous traffic. How about rewards for safe and
share the ride drivers?
In summary, I plan to continue indefinitely toward a solution to this problem
in which past consultant mitigation efforts have not been and are not effective with
today's auto-culture. Planned staff generated, with traffic consultants, five and
ten-year traffic plans are not acceptable - citizens will die or be injured in traffic
while we wait for solutions.
We have auto cancer in Temecula - early treatment is the only cure, and it
absolutely can be done - and soon! We can then proceed in a more orderly
future residential development designed for our new citizens.
Temecula is now a destination city. That same vitality that brought usto
this transition can be used to meet today's transportation problems.
Respectfully,
Sam Pratt
ITEM 17
APPROVAL ,-~
c, Y ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ClTY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thrornhill, Deputy City Manager~
November 28, 2000
Discussion of the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Plan
Conservation Plan Alternatives Development Document; Adoption of Preferred
Alternative
PREPARED BY:
Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Alternative No. 1 as the preferred alternative and direct the City
Clerk to forward the minute order stating the Council's decision to the Western Riverside Council of
Governments prior to December 4, 2000.
BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan is a
significant component of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RClP). During the last Council
workshop presented by the County on October 17, 2000, each Council member was given hard
copies of the MSHCP Executive Summary of the Preliminary Draft Alternatives Document, and CD
of the entire draft. At this time the County is seeking input from the Cities regarding the Draft
Alternatives to be considered in the next step of the MSHCP process, which will involve a more
detailed conservation analysis, and preparation of a preliminary administrative draft MSHCP. The
scenarios in the Draft Alternative Document propose to offer protection for currently listed species
and those that may be listed in the future
The Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) is the City's direct spokesman to the
County regarding the MSHCP process. WRCOG has requested that each city in western Riverside
County to identify which of the four alternatives that it believes to be the most beneficial to
achieving all party's goals. This information is requested for consideration at the WRCOG
Executive Committee meeting of December 4, 2000. This information will be forwarded to the
MSHCP Advisory Committee and will be considered in that body's final determination of which
alternative should be analyzed in the Preliminary Administrative Draft MSHCP.
The MSHCP alternatives are generally stated in the following:
ALTERNATIVE 1: SPECIES CONSIDERED FOR CONSERVATION IN AUGUST 9, 1999 "DRAFT
MSHCP PROPOSAL". This alternative most closely seeks to "promote the viability and recovery of
western Riverside County ecosystems and habitats, and species dependent thereon towards a goal
of reducing the need to list additional species in the future." This alternative would conserve 160
species and represents the most complete of the alternatives for consideration.
ALTERNATIVE 2: LISTED, PROPOSED AND STRONG CANDIDATE SPECIES. The focus of
conservation for this alternative is the 36 listed, proposed and strong candidate species found in
western Riverside County. This alternative focuses on the conservation of 36 species but does not
give as much consideration of the broad-base tenets of habitat planning and preservation. With
this plan an additional 108 species could be conserved because of shared habitat that is common
to the 36 species noted above.
ALTERNATIVE 3: LISTED AND PROPOSED SPECIES. This alternative would target the
conservation of 29 species that are listed as endangered and those proposed to be listed. This
alternative is similar to alternative 2 above but is less comprehensive in scope. This alternative
could provide additional preservation for up to 101 species.
ALTERNATIVE 4: EXISTING RESERVES. This alternative maintains the existing reserve system
as it stands today. Because additional lands are not anticipated to be acquired, this alternative
does not meet the intent of the MSHCP and realistically is not a candidate for serious
consideration.
ANALYSIS: The County's environmental consultant, Dudek and Associates ("Dudek"), tentatively
estimates a land area between 500-600 acres within the City of Temecula will be necessary to
achieve Temecula's share of adequate conservation under the MSHCP. The proposed lands to be
included in the plan lie chiefly within the riparian areas of the City. Staff has confirmed with Dudek
that the areas proposed for conservation within the City are the lands that are currently
undeveloped. The MSHCP proposes to purchase these lands, thus preserving private property
rights. Fortunately the majority of the land proposed for conservation within the City are in the flood
way and are not developable, furthermore, these lands are largely designated as Open Space in
the City's General Plan.
'The riparian lands at issue are delineated in Alternative 1, which proposes to conserve portions of
Murrieta Creek, Warm Springs Creek, Temecula Creek and Pechanga Creek. Alternatives 2 and 3
propose to conserve portions of Murrieta Creek, Temecula Creek and Pechanga Creek.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this juncture for the City. The MSHCP Advisory Committee is currently studying funding
techniques. The City will have the ability to comment and participate In future consideration of
related cost items.
ATTACHMENTS:
Associates.
reprints of the alternative maps 1, 2 and 3 prepared by Dudek and
'"\..~///?1111~
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager./~
November 28, 2000 ,
SUBJECT: Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report
Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month
of October 2000.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Leads & Inquiries
In the month of October, the City received 9 inquiries and 3 leads. The leads include a high
tech company that came from an IEEP lead, a client of Community National Bank and a high
tech start-up from Seattle, WA.
In the month of October, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 26 leads
on behalf of the City of Temecula. Attached is a copy of their report that gives a detailed
account of the leads.
On October 25th, staff met with owners of a high tech start-up company in the Seattle area
that are interested in locating their corporate headquarters to San Diego or Temecula. Staff
provided them with specific information and data on Temecula.
Business Relations Visitations/Surveys
Staff met with Ram Pillai of Nuphoton Technologies on October 30t~ as part of an EDC
Business Relations visit. The firm manufacturers signal amplifications equipment for fiber-optic
communication networks.
Staff conducted a phone survey of A1 Signs for the EDC Business Retention Committee.
Note: Information on Fast Track, Expansion, Relocation and Speculative Building can be found
in the Community Development Department report.
Film Leads & Hiahli;hts
In the month of October, the Film Council received 28 phone calls regarding the Film Festival
and 18 calls regarding locations information requests.
Please refer to the attached Film Council report for additional activities.
Media/Outreach Materials
The Southwest Riverside County Advertising Supplement to the Business Press was
published on October 23ra. The Southwest County Alliance purchased advertising space. Staff
submitted editorial on Temecula (see attached).
Staff submitted editorial and information to Kelly Kostiuk, County of Riverside, to include in the
Temecula section of the Riverside County Kiosk Network. In addition to our standard
package, Temecula will receive at no charge, a rotational advertisement for six months that
will be available throughout the western, central and eastern regions of Riverside County. The
multi-media, computer-based kiosk provides interactive access to over 20,000 records of
information on jobs, training, education and entertainment.
Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled "Partnerships
Strengthen City Marketing Efforts." The article highlights Temecula's excellent partnerships
with its business and civic leaders, organizations and educational institutions.
Meetin,qs
On October 4~, an in-house meeting was held with the GIS depaH, ment to brainstorm with staff
from the City Manager, Planning, Economic Development, and Information Systems
departments on ways that we could maximize use of our GIS for economic development
purposes.
On October 4~, staff met with Dick Kennedy to discuss the proposed expansion of the auto
mall.
On October 5~, staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committee meeting. A follow-up
action report was given on Safari Gard, Stretch Forming Corp. and Toyota of Temecula. A
company contact report was given on National Process Industries Inc., Kirk Machine & Tool and
Gilead Custom Welding.
On October 6t~, staff attended the Murrieta Temecula Group meeting. Verizon Corporation
spoke on the future of telecommunication services in Southwest Riverside County within the
next ten years.
Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and Jim O'Grady met with Dave Wilson, owner of Destination
Temecula, and Rich IIles, owner of Sun Diego Charter, to discuss a potential commuter
transportation service between Temecula and San Diego. Mr. Wilson and Mr. liles are still
in the development stage of determining the viability of this venture. Staff provided them with a
resource at the San Diego Association of Governments to help them with transportation and
commuter statistics.
Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council meeting on October
11th. Guidant's Recruiting Specialist, Nonnie McClain, spoke on the topic "Locate, Recruit,
and Retain." In addition, Glen Zachman, with North-South Machinery, spoke on the topic
"EDM Technology."
The Marketing Committee meeting was held on October 12th. Highlights of the items
discussed included the following:
II.
Ill.
IV.
City Banner Program Policy
The City will be providing assistance with advertising and informing the public of
major community events occurring in Temecula via City Street Banners. Event
banners will be placed on every third pole along Rancho California & Winchester
Roads. The City will pay for the design, manufacturing, storage, cleaning and
changeover costs for the major events that the City sponsors.
Capital Improvement Projects Update
Jim O'Grady provided an update of the CIP projects for Fiscal Years 2001-2005.
Information on non-street projects were also reported which included the Community
Theater, Children's Museum, Sports Park, Trails Masterplan, etc. (see attached)
Business Resources
a)
Community Profile
Dr. John Husing's updated Community Profile was distributed.
provides demographic, economic and quality of life data
Temecula.
This document
and trends for
b)
Southwest Riverside County Business Resource Guide
The 52-page guide offers information about not only local agencies, officials and
organizations, but also an array of state, federal and Intemet resources ready to
assist in every stage of business development. Copies were distributed.
Familiarization Tours
a)
Chamber of Commerce
The Tourism Committee organized a FAM tour for tour operators to be held
October 20 - 21. An itinerary was planned to experience the wineries, Old Town,
Pechanga, golf resorts, and hot air ballooning.
b)
Inland Empire Tourism Council "Weekend in the Country"
The Inland Empire Tourism Council organized a FAM tour including the cities of
Hemet, Idyllwild and Temecuia, which was held on October 6 - 8. Details of the
FAM are included in the tourism section of this report.
City Marketing/Advertising Update
a) Business Development Marketing Materials
Business Brochure - Staff is updating the City's business brochure with new
data from Dr. John Husing's demographic information, new businesses will be
included, and new photography. The format will be consistent with the present
brochure.
Testimonial - One page, two-sided testimonial insert will be updated and will
include a cross section of local businesses. This will be used in our business kit
Community Profile - demographic facts - a local broker brought this to our
attention and we will be producing one similar. Some people just ask for data at
a glance.
VI.
b)
Tou~sm
Sign on San Diego Website
· San Diego Union Tribune website
· Receives 10 million page impressions/month - that's over 100 million hits
· Year contract
Customize our site - can be update
· 7 pages - home page, map, things to do, wine country, places to stay,
shopping/restaurants, living in Temecula
· We are able to highlight our major events on the site free
· We can link to our website
A copy was distributed to the committee members to review with instruction to
submit any changes to staff. Pat Comerchero, City's webmaster, will be
reviewing the material as well and will be setting up links to the City site.
Advertising - Tourism Publications
The City advertised in The Guest Informant, which came out in July. The
publication is distributed in San Diego and Orange County hotel rooms. We
received coverage throughout the book. Temecula also receives free coverage
in their quarterly Quick Guide which is distributed at shopping centers, Visitor
Centers, etc.
The Inland Empire Regional Visitors Guide, produced by the Inland Empire
Tourism Council, will be coming out in November. Temecula received prime
advertising spot on the back cover at no extra charge.
Staff is working on a new ad for the North County CONVIS Visitors Guide that
is due in October. As an advertiser of this publication, San Diego Magazine
produced a nice article on wine country in their August issue.
The City is also working with the Winegrowers Association on incorporating
some mention of other things to do in Temecula along with wine country in their
Sunset Magazine ads.
Staff worked with the travel writer on the Temecula article that was published in
the October issue of Inland Empire Family Magazine.
Orange County CONVIS
The City is now a member of Orange County CONVIS. We are looking to advertise
with them. They distribute convention bookings, which staff wilt work with
Destination Temecula on the appropriate leeds.
VII. Business & Visitors Surveys
At the July 25~ City Council meeting there was discussion regarding measuring the
economic benefits of City sponsored events. Councilmember Mike Naggar
suggested that the Chamber of Commerce take a lead role in surveying our business
community. City staff and the Chamber compiled a Visitor and Business Survey.
The Chamber will conduct a random sampling of fifty local businesses covering
various business types. They will first contact the business by phone and then will
fax a copy of the survey to the business to respond to.
The visitors survey will be given to visitors attending other special events.
Councilmembers Comemhem and Roberts and staff met with the auto dealers at Norm
Reeves on October 18th to discuss their proposed expansion.
Staff attended the Chamber of Commerce Business Expo at Temeku Hills on October 18~.
Approximately 100 businesses throughout the Temecula Valley were represented.
Staff attended the 5th Annual Diamond Venture Forum at the Mission Inn Hotel on October
19~. This event is sponsored by the IEEP. Since its founding in 1996, over $7 million in capital
has been raised by the twenty-nine companies that have made presentations of their business
plan at the Forum. At the 2000 Forum, nine high tech companies presented their business
plans to an audience of investors.
Staff held an in-house meeting on October 23rd to discuss the content of the City's Economic
Development site. The City's webmaster will be presenting a draft of the site to the Economic
Development Department.
Staff attended the IEEP Membership Recognition Luncheon, which was held on October 25~.
At this luncheon the IEEP recognized and thanked the companies who have been continuous
members over the last 10 and 15 years.
Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County
Board of Director's meeting on October 26~. A financial report was given. There was an
update given on the EDC's web site and newsletter.
Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance meeting on October 26~.
Items discussed included responding, tracking and follow-up of leads, advertising and cd-rom
update, trade show attendance, IEEP Hi Tech/Bio Tech Research Project and marketing
program targeted to the Silicon Valley. The Alliance television ad ran on Channel 10 in San
Diego dudng the Good Morning Amedca program and throughout the Wodd Sedes
programming.
Staff attended an Inland Empire Economic Partnership Working Breakfast and Business
Investment Forum on October 31'~ at the Mission Inn. Mr. Casper Weinberger, Chairman of
Forbes Inc., spoke and offered his observations on wodd affairs and the economy.
On October 31", staff and members of the Economic Development Sub-committee
(Councilmembers Comerchero and Roberts) met with representatives of LOGRES. This firm is
considering a program to install fiber-optic cables throughout Temecula, starting with a
pilot program.
TOURISM
Familiarization Tours
The Weekend in the Country FAM tour that was organized by the Inland Empire Tourism
Council was extremely productive and successful. Of the 21 attendees there were travel
writers, editors, film makers and photographers from Westways, RV Journal, Forbes, Califomia
Seniors, California State Division of Toudsm Publications, Fun with the Family in So. CA travel
book, Malibu Times, KSPI Palm Spdngs, etc.
As a result of the Weekend in the Country FAM tour, during the month of October, Westways
Magazine is producing a story on the Museum and Old Town, KPSI Palm Springs 9.20 radio
station - Jackie Olden show, did an interview with the IETC on the recent FAM tour and the
wineries, Malibu Times published an article on Temecula, Clickers & Flickers Photo Network
included Temecula on their website and in their newsletter. (see attached)
In October, the City donated gift baskets to the Chamber of Commerce for their
Familiarization Tour of tour operators.
Media/AdvertisinRIOutreach Materials
Staff provided information and photography to travel writer Ruth Planey. Temecula was
highlighted in the October issue of Inland Empire Family Magazine. The article was titled:
"Cities for Families - Temecula.' (see attached)
Final revisions were made on the Temecula section for the Sign on San Diego Website (San
Diego Union Tribune). The site will be up and running by the end of November.
Staff made the final revisions to the Temecula information for The Inland Empire Regional
Visitors Guide. The guide will be coming out by the end of the year. Temecula received the
prime advertising spot located on the back cover with no additional charge.
The City is providing financial assistance and working with the Winegrowers Association on
incorporating some mention of other things to do in Temecula along with wine country in their
Sunset Magazine ads.
The Inland Empire Toudsm Council produced the Southern California Inland Empire
Destination Guide for Recreation. As part of our membership with the Inland Empire
Economic Partnership, Temecula attractions and events are listed in the guide free of charge.
(see attached)
Mr. Scott Gold with the Los Angeles Times wrote an article on the Temecula Wine Country.
He interviewed Mayor Stone and Councilmember Sam Pratt.
On October 25t~, staff set up and attended a photo shoot at the Temecula Valley Museum,
Westways magazine was requesting photos of the museum and wanted views of children
participating in the hands-on activities. The photos will also be used for other publications.
See FAM Tour media results (listed above).
Balloon & Wine Festival Association
Attached is a copy of the 2000 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival summary for your
review.
Special Event
Race For The Cure
On October 11~, staff held the final organizational meeting with event organizers and City
Departments for The Race For The Cure event, which was held on Sunday, October 22"~.
City Council and staff attended the VIP Sponsor Appreciation Reception for the Race For
The Cure on October 19th at the Promenade Mall.
A team of City of Temecula employees participated as runners/walkers in this event. As a
sponsor the City was given an exhibit booth. Toudsm materials and flyers on upcoming
Community services Department activity programs and events were also distributed.
Meetings
On October 9t~, staff met with the Economic Development Sub-committee, Councilmembers
Comerchero and Roberts, to review a draft of the City Banner Program and Policy. This topic
was to be discussed further at the upcoming Marketing Committee Meeting on October 12~.
The City/~Ninegrowers co-op advertising contribution was discussed. As a result of the
meeting, it was the recommendation of the Economic Development Sub-committee to contribute
$5,000 of the City's promotional pregrem budget to the Winegrower's Association. This would
be applied to the Winegrower's advertising in Sunset Magazine. A tag line/mention of other
tourism attractions would be included on the ad.
On October 25a, staff met with John Sterling and Pat Vesey to review the design for the
Rod Run banners that will be displayed in January along Rancho California and Winchester
Roads. A graphic designer is currently modifying the Rod Run banner design that has been
done for Old Town.
ATTACHMENTS
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report
Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County
Activities Report
Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report
Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activities Report
Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Summary
Capital Improvement Program Handout
Media Attachments
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124
Temecula, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201
November 7, 2000
Shax~m Nelson, City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Shawn:
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of
Temecula.
This is the month of October at a glance:
Business Inquiry Highlights:
5 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula.
They received a business packet which includes information on demographics, relocation,
housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc.
Committee Highlights:
Tourism & Visitors Council: The "Escape to Temecula" Fam Tour on October 20 & 21 was a
huge success. Committee members have already been contacted by tour attendees for future
tours of Ternecula. A list will be formulated of all tour attendees that have hosted groups to
Temecula for tracking purposes. The committee will be devoting its next meeting to
accomplishments they have achieved this year and goals they wish to achieve in the future.
Education Committee: The committee has accomplished its goals set out for the year 2000, and
has proposed new projects to mn through 2001. One of the projects, just recently approved by
the 'F¥CC Board of Directors, is a job fair. A series of mini workshops will be held at the local
high schools to prepare students for immediate employment. Workshops will focus on online
resume writing, interviewing skills, how to dress for an interview, and how to fill in an
application. At the end of the workshops, Chamber members will be invited to the job fair to
interview students for possible employment opportunities. The committee will be working with
the school district's career administrators and assistance from representatives of the Regional
Occupational Program.
Ways & Means Committee: Plans for the 2001 Golf Tournament are beginning. The
tournament has been expanded to 27 holes and will host up to 216 golfers. The tournament is
scheduled for May 4th at Temecula Creek Inn. Promotions for the 2001 B2B Tech Expo
continue. Advertisements will be carried in San Diego and Orange County publications. The
Press-Enterprise and the Business Press will promote the event in Riverside County. The
February 17, 200 l Installation Banquet and Award Ceremony Committee continue to meet and
strive to make this a wonderful event. 550 guests will be present at this event.
Local Business Promotions Committee: The Local Business Committee delivered 73 boxes to
the businesses participating in "Shop Temecula First" for November. Hogi Yogi was selected for
the "Chamber Spotlight" program that Froggy 92.9 is sponsoring. The Success Seminar
scheduled for November 14 from 11:30 to 1:30pm at Embassy Suites. The Seminar will
highlight many basic employment laws for businesses of all sizes. The "Shopping Bag" arrived
for the float to be used to promote "Shop Temecula First" in the Holiday Lights and 4th of July
Parades.
Government Actio· Committee: Gary Thomhill gave a presentation on the Vail Rancho
annexation. Al Vollbrecht with the City of Mumeta gave an update on the WRTA Bill.
Temecula Board of Directors and Government Action Committee supported Proposition 35, 37
and 39 and SB 1637. The Chamber encouraged the TVCC membership via the Temecula Today!
newsletter to vote on November 7th.
Membership Committee: Chamber staff and Ambassadors attended 14 Ribbon Cuttings the
month of October. The Quarterly Open House was Tuesday, Oct. 10th, new members networked
and met Board members, staff and committee chairs. Business Expansion was the topic at the
Special Topic/Ambassador Breakfast on October 25th at Embassy Suites Hotel, 50 members
attended. Sterling Senior Community will be hosting the mixer on Wed., Nov. 15th. Sterling
Community is expecting 1,200 guest.
· Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution)
300 Temecula Brochures and 300 Winery Brochures to Desert Hills Premium Outlets for
distribution to visitors.
150 Visitor Guides to Lawrence Welk Resorts for distribution to guests.
· 150 Visitor Guides, 50 Winery Brochures and 50 Promenade Mall to TVCC's Weekend Visitor
Center for distribution to tourists.
· 120 Temecula Brochures, 20 City Maps, 20 Visitor Guides and 20 Winery Brochures to Sterling
Senior Communities for distribution to visitors.
· 100 School Brochures, 30 Winery Brochures, 25 Visitor Guides, 20 Temecula Brbchures to
Century 21 Newsom for distribution to clients and VIP grand openings.
· 75 Visitor Guides to the Days Inn fbr distribution to guests.
· 40 Visitor Guides and 40 Winery Brochures to Yellow Magic Inc. for distribution to customers
visiting the area.
· 20 Tcmccula Brochures, 20 Visitor Guides and 20 Winery Brochures to Susan Szekanshi for
distribution a women's conference at March Air Force Base.
· 20 Visitor Guides to Saguaro Seniors for dislribution to members playing gold in Temecula.
Marketing Highlights
· The Chamber received 29 requests for Visitor Guides in response to the Temecula ad placed in
the 2000 San Diego North Official Visitors Guide.
· The Press Enterprise and Californian now offer the Chamber a full-page advertisement once per
month on which we have the opportunity to promote the various events and programs.
· The City of Temecula Street maps are scheduled to be delivered the end of December.
Activity Report
· Total Tourism calls were up 23.15 percent in October
· Total Phone calls were up 5.14 pement in October
· Total Walk-ins were up 57.60 percent in October
· 249 Mailings were sent out in October
· 160 e-mail requests were serviced in October
Also attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways &
Means, Local Business Promotions, Membership Committee, Government Actions and a October
issue of Temecula Today! If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to
call me. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Alice Sullivan
PresidenffCEO
cc: Mayor Jeffery E. Stone
Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Comerchero
Councilman Ronald H. Roberts
Councilman Sam Pratt
Councilman Mike Naggar
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
Gary Tlaomhill, Deputy City Manager
Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
TVCC Board of Directors
3
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
FOR ocTOBER, 2000
Chamber Vis. Center Total
PHONE CALLS This Month This Month Year-To-Date
TOURISM
TOURISM REFERRALS 447 3,700
Calendar of Events 200 1,640
Special Events 153 3,292
General Information 1397 12,219
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,197 20,851
RELOCATION 148 1542
DEMOGRAPHICS 50 592
CHAMBER 1,446 16,387
MISCELLANEOUS 212 2,148
TOTAL PHONE CALLS 4,053 41,530
* CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A
WALK-INS
TOURISM 302 238 3,614
CALENDAR OF EVENTS 153 0 1489
SPECIAL EVENTS 96 0 733
GENERAL INFORMATION 1043 166 9,056
RELOCATION 239 0 1,775
DEMOGRAPHICS 93 0 986
CHAMBER 884 0 8,630
MISCELLANEOUS 137 9 1,704
TOTAL WALK-INS 2,947 413 27,987
MAILINGS
TOURISM 116 1225
RELOCATION 66 956
DEMOGRAPHICS 65 883
TOTAL MAILINGS 249 3,064
E-MAIL
TOURISM 52 360
RELOCATION 41 369
MISCELLANEOUS 67 831
TOTAL E -MAI L 160 1,560
WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS N/A N/A
GRAND TOTALS THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
PHONE CALLS 4,053 41,530
WALK-INS 3,360 27,987
MAILINGS 249 3,064
E -MAI L 160 1,560
CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A 8,614
ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS
Chamber Chamber
October, 1999 October, 2000
Percentage
Increase
PHONE CALLS
TOURISM
Tourism Referrals 336 447 33.04
Calendar of Events 86 200 132.56
Special Events 244 153 -37.30
General Information 1,118 1,397 24.96
TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,784 2,197 23.15
RELOCATION 123 148 20.33
DEMOGRAPHICS 19 50 163.16
CHAMBER 1,810 1,446 -20.11
MISCELLANEOUS 119 212 78.15
TOTAL PHONE CALLS 3,855 4,053 5.14
CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A
WALK-INS
TOURISM 158 302 91.14
CALENDAR OF EVENTS 95 153 61.05
SPECIAL EVENTS 24 96 300.00
GENERAL INFORMATION 559 1043 86.58
RELOCATION 126 239 89.68
DEMOGRAPHICS 41 93 126.83
CHAMBER 706 884 25.21
MISCELLANEOUS 36 137 280.56
VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 387 413 6.72
TOTAL WALK-INS 2,132 3,360 57.60
MAILINGS
TOURISM 123 118 -4.07
RELOCATION 83 66 -20.48
DEMOGRAPHICS 79 65 -17.72
TOTAL MAILINGS 285 249 -12.63
E-MAIL
TOURISM 14 52 271.43
RELOCATION 19 41 115.79
MISCELLANEOUS 138 67 -51.45
TOTAL E-MAIL 171 160 -6.43
* Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls
11-09-200 4:~0~M FROM EDC-$WRG 909GOOG005 P. 2
EDG
November 9, 2000
]ira O'G-rady
Assistant City Manager
City of Ternccula
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92593-9033
RE: Activity Summary - October 2000
Business Develo_ument
· Staff responded to the follOWing two business development inquiries for
Staff received a phone inquiry from Andy McElhinney regarding assistance
land development for a parcel near Scott Road and Interstate 215. The in
Moran, Riverside County EDA, for fast tracking and land development
architect design information to a COnstruction firm in Arizona on the comr
Jefferson and Pear Streets in Mufflers. The construction firm would be
the region.
Marketing Outreach
Staffattended the following meetings/events:
:he month of October: 1)
for permit processing and
tuiry was referred to Rob
issues. 2) Staff provided
Jercial complex located at
~nstructing similar sites in
October S, 2000 - Murrieta Home-Based Business Survey Presenta :ion - Staff attended the
presentation at Murrieta Council Chambers. Survey methodolcgy, major results and
recommendations were pr~,es,.en, ted by owners of the Business Learning Center, the project's facilitator.
October 11, 2000 - SWRC Manufacturers' Council - Staff attended t~e monthly meeting at the
Temecula Workforee Development Center. "Locate, Recruit, Ret~n" ~a.~ presented by Nonnie
McClain~ recruiting specialist of Guidant Corporation, and "EDM Techr~ology" was presented by
Glen Zaehman &North-South Machinery. !
October 12, 2000 - Murrieta Broker~' Meeting - Staff attended the qu~terly brokers meeting at
Murriera Council Chambers. H-tghlights and major finding of the home-b~sed business survey were
presented; Gary London of the London Group presented his findings On thc recently completed
Murrieta town Square Commercial Market Analysis; and updates of the :ity of Murders Planning,
Building, and Public Works Departments were presented.
October 12, 2000- City of Temecula Marketing Meeting- Staff atten~ ted the marketing meeting
at Temecula City Hall to discuss the draft banner policy, capital impro cement projects, business
resources, familiarization tours, city marketing/advertising, business ~ad visitor surveys, and
individual reports from each agency representative.
11-09-200 &:BOPM FROM EDC-SWRC 9096006000 P. 3
Jim O'Crrady
City of Temecula
Activity Summary - October 2000
Page 2 of 2
· October 1.2, 2000 - Lake Elsin0re Valley Chamber of Commerce/EDI
Staff attended the quarterly luncheon held at the Lake Elsinore Cultural
Michael Wright, project manager of the Santa Aaa Watershed AuthorityI
manager of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, discussed detail
and its positive impact in the region.
· October 18, 2000 - Supervisor Yenahle's Third District Workshop hel,
Development Center. Dr. John Husing, Inland Empire ecOnomist, presente
the Inland Empire, and a presentation by the Commissioner of the Thirc
Quarterly Luncheon -
enter. K~Dmotc speakers
and John Rossi, general
of the brine line project
at the Hemet Workfi}rCe
[ an economic forecast of
District Youth Advisory
Council.
October 2~, 2000 - Murrieta State-of-the-Ci~ Event - Staff attended
presented by the City of Murdeta, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce and
School District.
Business Relations
· October 5, 2000 - Staff attended the EDC Business Relations Committe
meeting minutes.)
he state_-of-the-city event
Mutricta Valley Unified
Meeting. (See attached
Administration/Organization
· October 3, 2000 - W0rkforce Development Center Disaster Team ~eeting - Staff is a team
member for the Temccula WDC Disaster Team. Policies and protocol[ for fire evacuation were
discussed.
* October ! 0, 2000 - EDC Program Committee Meeting - EDC Pro ram Committee members
discussed the topics of interests and scheduling for the 2000-2001 quarterly luncheons.
· October 10 8[ 19, 2000 - Web Site Meeting with Debi Spitzfadcn of lnq alre - Staff met with Debi
Spitzfaden of Intake to finalize the EDC's web site enhancement project.
· October 26, 2000 - EDC Board. of Directors Meeting held in thc Work brce Development Center
in Temecula. (See attached dra.q meeting minutes.)
· During the month of October, stafffacilitatcd the daily operations of the E[ ~C, coordinated the details
of the upcoming EDC newsletter including design and content, respond ~d to one web site emall
inquiry relative to membership, and provided training to the new ps t-time employee Rhonda
Blacharski
This concludes thc activity summary for Oqtober 2000. Should you have que~ons or need further detail,
please call me at 600-6064. I
Sincerely,
Diane Sessions
Administrator
EDC of Southwest Riverside County
11-09-200 A:51PM
FROM EDC-Si~/RC 9096006005
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEET
Thursday, October 5, 2000 - 9:00 a.m.
Workforce Development Center, Executive Board
27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, CA
Committee Members Prese,nt:
Dennis Frank, UCR Extension
Bonnie Renz-Hanna, Diversified, The Staffing Solution
Keith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank
Michael Lewin, Mirau, Edwards, Cannon, Farter & Lewin
Para Migliozzi, Dawn Human Resources
Lon Moss, City Of Munieta
Trish Nelson, US B~nk ·
Kathlccn Newton, Publ!shing Professionals
Mark O'Connor, Loc & Associates
Jim O'Cn'ady, City of Temeeula
David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council
Alice Sullivan, Temecula Valley Chamber Of Commerce
Gary Yonmann Fallbrook National Bank
Also In,
Diane Se
Rhonda i
NG
.ttendanee:
ssions, EDC Staff
~lacharsld, F_DC Staff
1
Call To Order /
" Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:03 a.~r~
1
Welcome
· Michael Lcwin introduced Rhonda Bla~harski of the EDC staff and that
FoliowTup Action Reports
Safari Gard- Ga~ Youmans scm owners a list of local SBA lenders.
· Sl~tch Forming Corp.- David Waite to provide inforrnation on compu
San Jacinto College.
o Toyota of Temecula - Dennis Frank provided t~e owner reformation
through UCR.
~ompany Contact Reports..
iced all for attending
er t~chnology classes at Mt.
technical/mechanic training
Advanced Composites - Mark O'Conner reported the company manuf tctures athletic gear, racecar
equipment and surfboards with a special composite that makes thcmilightcr, stronger, with more
movcability. The company has been in its current localJon for I year ~nd in Tcmeeula for 6 years.
Owners indicated difficulty finding skilled employees who could accurately read measurements.
Vc~y happy with thc area and no plans to expand at this t/mc. I
National Process industries - Bonnie Hanna reported that Dick i Kurtz and Bruce Drayton
accompanied her on this visit. The company started in 1963 in ,%uth Gate, and has b~,n in
Tcm~cula since 1986. They manufacture a dry lubricant process for afl plane parts for military
11-09-200 A:B1PM FROM EDC-SWRC 9~96006006 P. B
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes - October 5, 2000
Page 2 of 4
and aerospace industries. They were self-ranked as a small company wi,l~ g employees. They ranked
the economy good and feel Tcmecula and Murnota were good places to live.
· Gilead - Bonnie Hanna reported the COmpany is a mom-and-pop organization that provides custom
welding for customers such as Disney and various malls. The company relocated from San Diego
and has been in business for 2 years. Their COmpetition is local and tgey feel them is not enough
skilled welders in the area. The COmpany currently has 5 employees!and plans to increase their
employee base. They ne,d help with a business and marketing plan, Ms: Hanna will send
information on business plans and financial planning. Lon Bmsegard o~the Manufaetorers' Council
will provide infon~a~ion on training for welders.
· Kirk Machine & Tool - Bonnie Hanna reported a telephone interview with a COmpany that is a
machine shop for electronics and irrigation parts. They've been ini business for 12 years and
relocated from Canada due to the area. They would like m expand from 22,000 sq. fi. to 39,000 sq.
fi. Their major COncern is a culvert behind their business that cot!Id have potential drainage
problems during the rain season. It has not been regularly weeded and maintained. Jim O'Orady
will follow up.
· Casino Equipment & Supply -- Bonnie Hanna reported the COmpany ~a~uld change their name to
Golden Eagle due to new ownership. The owner was unavailable for a .,~isit but would complete the
survey and return to us.
· E-Percoption Technology - Jim O'Grady reported the COmpany peffofrrns web-based surveys, with
immediate results and on-line training tailored to the survey results. They are located in the Tower
Plaza in Temecula- Grog Laborite is the owner.
· Double Eagle Golf- Lori Moss repoded a phone intendcw. The company opened in 1993 and
changed ownership in January 2000. They relocated from Garden Grove and have 4 employees.
Economy is ranked stable and their main COmpetition is a driving range in Menifee. Future plans
include a golf academy.
· Backyard Dreams - Loft Moss reported the owner is a general anc~ swimming pool contractor,
operating since 1981. Self-ranked as a medium size business, they cUnCmly have 7 employees with
no plans to increase. SUlks have been way up and the owner feels tli¢ economy is stable. Major
challenge has been difficulty obtaining permits from the City Of Temecula and Riverside County.
Jim O'C-rady will follow up with owner.
Goal
· Michael Lewin reported he would provide an updated goal progress report in October. Mr.
Lewin recognized Borne Hanna for the most visits in Septemberl and also thanked Lori Moss
and Mark O'Conner for lh¢ir visits.
11-09-200 4:62PM FROM EDC-SWRC 9~96006006 ~. 6
Business Relatior. q Committee Mooting
Mimr~s - October 5, 2000
Page 3 of 4
New,,C, 9mmittee Asslenments
· Point persons for October included David Waite, Jim O'Grady, Kathlecn Newton and Pam
Migiliozzi. Binders were'not available at the meeting, and Diane SeSSions said she would deliver
them to the point persons.
Strategic VisiB - Michael Lewin reported the strateg/c Visits for October were not yet assigned due
to thc unaVmlability of the binders.
· Business License List: Michael Lewin requested that commiitee members rcmm their pomons of the
TemeculzfMurrieta busin~ license list as soon as possible. :
· Alice Sullivan reported the Chamber wants to form a parmcrship committee with the Ioruecula
Valley Unified School District to explore tbe needs of the business community.
E~ ,DC/City/County News and Information
· EDC Board Update - Crary Youmans reported thc Scpt~mbe~ Quar~riy Lunch?on went very well.
Prcscntat/ons by John Husing and Michael B~'4~rich wcrc well received. The newsletter was in
progress and the officer elcctiuns were completed. Diane Sessions rcpvr~ed that staff was cun'cntly
working on memberships. Mr. Youmans al~o reported a name change ltmt Fallb~ook National Bank
would become Community National'Bank effective Tuesday, October 10.
· City of Temeeula - Jim O'Cnady reported that Gary Youmaus and Mayor Jeff Stone would be
interviewed by a San Francisco radio station with a short segment on the growth in Tem¢cula;
business licenses were now amiable online; the Business Resource Guide would be mailed with
business license renewal letters in December; the Council denied the Wolf Creek Project off Pala
Road; the City would hold a workshop for conUactors to help improve thor understanding of the
processes of various permittcompliance issues; the Susan Korean Race .,For The Core would be held
on October 22 at The Promenade Mall; the City would have a team and guest Lt. Governor Cruz
Bastamantc would attend the run; Great Ternccula Tra~tor Race wohld be held the weekend of
October 7. The relocation of Scott's Gardening to Temecula was not:yet finalized due to dcctric
usage issues with FAimn. City of Lake £1si~ore - No report available. City of Murrieiag
Murrieta Valley Chamber of Commerce -Lot/Moss reported that Mmcta would have a team at
the Susan Korean Race; the Council approved amendments to the downtown project; results of the
home-based business survey would be presented Wnight at City Hall; the Council approved funding
for the now police department; the Murrie~a Brokers Meeting would be held on Thursday, October
12; Kathlccn Newton repotled the State of the City would be held at the Movie Experience on
October 25 with a continental breakfast proVided by Target and with the school district providing a
student art exhibit; Murrieta Chamber and Munieta Valley PTA would hold an event on November
4 to highlight community services and a Business Expo; the Chamber. is working to improve their
website. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce --Alice Sullivan reported a Busincss Showcase
was scheduled for October 18; the Ambassador Networking B~x, tkfast would be held on October 25;
a Success Seminar lunch would be held on November 14 featuring Labor Attorney Jack O'Dounel;
thc Installation Dinner would be beld on February 17, 2001;
11-0@-200 A:B3PM FROM EDC-SWRC 909600600B P_ 7
Business Relations Committee Meeting
Minutes - October 5, 2000
Page 4 of 4
~he B2B Expo would be held on lanua~y 26, 2001 at Pechanga, with 38 participating vendors to date.
Riverside County EDA - NO report available. SWRC Economic Alliance - No report available.
SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Rosentha] reported hc attended a Rota~ meeting with
Bob Larson of C-uirtsm~ who bad retired; a pl~aque would be presented to .Mr. Larson at the
Manufacturers' Council meeting on October 11 , and a guest spcake~ flora Gmdant would talk
about recruiting middle to upper management personnel; the pleasure boat cruise was tentatively
scheduled for December.
Adjournment
The toeing adjou~ed at 10:10 ~m.
11-09-200 ~:63PN FRO~ EDC-S~RC 9096006006
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING
Thursday, October 26, 2000 - 9:00
Workforce Development Center
27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temeeula, CA
BOARD MEMBERS
~o-n Bradley, Te~ecula CONNECT
I,'liko Doblado, The Promcnad~ Ivhll
Bonnie Re~-Hanna
Diversified Thc Staffing Solution
Dermis Fra~ UCR
,~.;tevie Hirdler, SWRC Economic AlIianee
Ron Holliday, City of Munfeta
K. eith Johnson, Mission Oaks National Bank
Am King, The C~s Company
Dick Kurtz, CDM Cn'oup Inc.
Michael Lewin, Law Offices of Mirau Edward
Camion Hatter &: Lewin
Rob Moran, Riverside County FDA
l,'athleen Newton, Murfieta Chamber
Of Commerce
?hil Oberhansley, Cannon Parks & Obcrhansley
.!ira O'Grady, City of Temecula
David Phares, D.L Phares & Associates
Gary Yoamans, Community National Bank
EDC STAFF
Diane Sessions
MEM]IERS AND GUESTS
:2Ai.I. TO ORDER
Board President Gary Youmans called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m.
:um.trr s
Motion was made by David Phares, seconded by Mike Doblado and carried unanimously to approve the
minutes of the September 21, 2000 Board of Directors Meeting as amgnded by adding Dick Kurtz as a
meeting attendee.
. ANCr ,,m3rOgT
The Board reviewed the Septomber 30, 2000 Fimmcial RgP°;¢ that showed a total monthly incomo of
$10,5~1.53, total expenses of $9,053.00, with total ~sh-in=bank of $106,480.38. Kathleen Newton
suggested the monthly financial statements reflect balances for current month, year-to-date, and funds
remaining_ Motion was made by Ron Bradley, seeon&d by Phil Oberkansley and carried unanimously to
approve the September 30, 2000 Financial Report as presemed.
The Board reviewed the year-end general ledger for FY 1999-2000. Ms. Sessions reported the general
ledger did not includo expenses for the .lane 2000 golf tournament. She reported that four inquiries were
made to Temecula Creek Inn for the final bill. ~ Youmans suggested the EDC earmark the golf
tournament expenses tmtil the invoice was received.
FROM EDC-SWRC 9096006006 R. 9
Economic Developmem Corporation
of Southwest Riverside County
Board of Directors Meeting- October 26, 2000
Minutes - Page 2 of 3
Quarterly Luncheon Reconciliation - The Board reviewed the September 2000 Quarterly Luncheon Report
that showed a deficit of $230.64. Diane Sessions reported the original estimate for linens, utensils and
dinnerware was projected on 75 attendees. There were approximately 90 guests in attendance and exlm
place settings for walk-ia guests, which increased the expense over the original estimate. Gary Youmam
asked for suggestions from the Board to enhance the quarterly luncheons. The Board discussed holding a
raffle at the luncheons. Mike Doblato offered a 100.00 gift certificate for the November luncheon.
CONTINUING BUSINESS
· Web Site Update: Diane Sessions reported the web site enhancements were completed and ready to publish_
Kathlcen Newton, Ron Holliday, Jim O'Grady, Dennis Frank, Crary Youmans and Marleoe Best would
review the web site.
· Media Committee: Gary YoumanS requested volunteers to sewe on the Media Committee. Kathleen
Newton volunteered to serve on the Media Committee to aS-~st with proofing and editing press release
coi'Rel~L
· Newsletter: Diane Sessions'presented an example of the EDC newsletter. Gary Y0umans suggested that
500 be printed. Ms. Sessions would obtain a cost estimate from Manrice Printers. Kathleen Newton
offered to assist with vendor negotiations for layout and cost_
OPEN DISCUSSION
· EI2K2 Administrative Updates - Diane Sessions reported that membership reneveals were low, Gary
Youmans suggested the Board call memb~s that have not yet renewed. Phil Oberhanslcy suggested the
Board review the member list at thc next board meeting. Mr. Yonnums suggested Morgan Stanley should
be approached for membership. Jim O'Grady would provide the contact information, MS. Sessions
reported Supervisor Venable's Third District Workshop was very informative, The next meeting was
planned for January 2001. David Phares suggested this be made a rcgul~ agenda item.
· City, Courdy and Chamber Updates: Cify ofMurrieta - Ron Holliday reported the State of the City went
very well; ground breaking for thc new police station would begin in two months; the City was pursuing a
fair resolution to an un-going tax dispute with Riverside County. C/ty ofTemecula - Jim O'Orady repo~ted
the City's web site included an economic development page and asked the Board to review it. Kathleen
Newton, Bonnie Hanna and Dennis Frank volunteered to review the web page and provide feedback. Mr.
O'Orady reported the zoning on Hwy 79 South has been approved for 300 to 400 apartments. Cily of Lal~e
EIs~nore - No report available. County of Riverside EDA - Rob Moran reported the County continued to
work on the gcnerai plan. He would attend a Bio-Corn Conference in San Diego to promote Biotech
companies in Southwest Riverside County. Mr. Moran also reported more commercial development along
Interstate 215 in the Peres region. SP,~C Economic Alliance - Stevie Hirdler reported the radio
commercials in San Diego were going very well. Two television commercials were pla~ed in prime spots,
one during the World Series and one during the president/al campa~gmng debates. Murdeta Chamber of
Commerce --- Kathleen Newton reported the Business Expo was scheduled for November 4 at Shivela
Middle School, and the Chamber's web site was being revamped. Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce - Mike Doblado reported the site s~arch for the new Chamber office was ongoing and was
targeted for occupancy within 2 years. The Chamber's focus for next year woilld be tourism and efforts to
increa~ the Transient O~cupancy Tax (TOT) from 8% to I0 or 11%.
11 --09-200 Zl.: ~,~-PM FROM EDC-~WRC 9~9~0~00.~ P. 10
g~onomic Devetopmem Corporation
)f Southwest Riverside Coun~
~oard of Directors Meeting- October 26, 2000
.Minutes - Page 3 of 3
SWRCManufactumrs' Council- Diane Sessions repeRed the Manufacturers' Council was working closely
with Wayne SuRer, project manager of the ACCESS Training Program, in training and labor force issues,
and would be addressing the need for affordable housing with the Temecula City Council. EDC Business
Relations Coramittee Update - Michael Lewin repoRed the EDC's priority was to accomplish more in-
person visits. Mr. Lewin also reported that committee support was very good. Goals for FY 2000-2001
were marked at 27 visits and 33 phone interviews, and were on track to date.
~DJOURNMENT
· At 10:05 a.m_, motion was made by Michael Lewin,
adjourn tho meeting.
seconded by Dick Kurtz and carded unanimously to
Respectively submitted by:
Diane Sessions
Rocording $~reta~y
Phil Obcrhansley
Board Secretary
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
ACTIVITIES REPORT
October 2000
Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Maggi Allen, President;
Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, Secretary/Treasurer; Sheri
Davis, Stacy Sievek, Judy Staats, Eve Craig, Joe Hohenberger, Patty Slaton
and Ellen Watkins
The Business of the Film Council
· This month we received 87 phone calls; 28 - Film Festival, 18-
locations information requests, 41 - council business.
The TVFC web site. www.temeculafilm.org has received 471 "hits" since it
opened on September 4, 2000. Photo and link updates will be a
continuous process.
· Information is being prepared for the new Production Guide. The new
Locations and Production Guide is scheduled to be completed for a major
mailing by the end of the year.
· The Film Council was asked to participate in the IEEP Fam Tour of
Temecula. We were able to meet with the Travel Writers and discuss the
Film Festival and filming in Temecula. The Film Council was also
invited to participate in the Chamber of Commerce Faro Tour and spoke
to the tour company representatives during a walking tour of Old Town.
· Plans are being made to turn some of the TVFC file photos into
postcards. There have been many requests from visitors in Old Town for
current Temecula area postcards. These would also be included in the
photo packages we give to Locations Scouts.
· The Temecula booth has been reserved for ShowBiz Expo 2001. It is
once again a comer booth. As Expo 2001 will be in May, before the
Balloon and Wine Festival, we have contacted the Festival organization
to start work on collaborative advertising and promotion at ShowBiz
Expo 2001.
Filming in Temecula
· Confirmed with local filmmaker, Joe Azerelli, that he will be producing
and directing a film in Temecula using a strip mall on Margarita Road.
Production should begin in January. TVFC will meet with Mr. Azerelli
again in December.
· Representatives of Cyclops Productions in New York requested location
photos of Temecula Vineyards. Photos were sent overnight and follow
up information was sent by regular mail. Cyclops confirmed that they
received the photos. This production is currently scheduled for Spring
2001 and no location has been chosen. We will stay in contact with
Cyclops Productions.
*Jon Edwards took photographs of children enjoying the Temecula Valley
Museum to accompany an article for Westways Magazine.
We will continue to support the daily management of filmmaker's requests,
and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It
is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the
context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opportunities and
benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses.
Respectfully,
Maggi Allen
President, TVFC
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP
ACTIVITY REPORT
Clipboard
November 2000
Classic Containers, a maker of plastic bottles, has expanded within Ontario purchasing a 100,000 square
foot building resulting in a $3.35 million deal. The company will be expanding its work force from 220 to
an estimated 300 employees.
Lite Source, Inc., an importer of light fixtures, has expanded its operations in Chino leasing a 125,000
square foot industrial building for seven years. Mark Kegans of Grubb & Ellis Company represented the
lessor in this $3.3 million deal.
Tolar Manufacturing, a maker of bus stop shelters, is relocating from Placantia into a 53,000 square foot
facility in Corona signing a 10-year lease. The company will be bdnging an estimated 45 to 50 new jobs to
the area. Tim Hawke of Grubb & Ellis Company represented the lessor in this $3 million deal. Source:
The Press Enterprise
Norcal Pottery, an importer of pots, has expanded within Ontario moving from 40,000 square feet into a
103,430 square foot building. The company that employs an estimated 50 people has signed a lease for a
$1.3 million transaction. Doug, John, and Paul Eamhart of Lee & Associates represented the lessor,
Standard Motor Products. Mike Guiliano, also of Lee & Associates, represented the lessee.
Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. (ESRI), a computer software developer, is building a
73,000 square foot addition to its complex in Redlands where 1,280 employees work. The addition will be
used to relieve overcrowding in other buildings and for future growth. The new facility will hold 400
employees. Source: San Bemardino County Sun
Caltrans, has decided to expand its San Bemardino offices and occupy an 80,000 square foot building.
Due to large transportation projects scheduled for the next four years they are planning to add 160 project
development personnel to their current staff of 900 employees.
CALl,BAR ITEMS
To register online for SBDC events: www.iesbdc.org
November 14: This one-day "Business Planning Workshop" is being held in Chino Hills from 9:30 a.m. to
11:30 a.m., free of charge. For more information call Melanie Cote at (909) 781-2345.
November 16: The city of Coachella and Coachella Chamber of Commerce are sponsoring the
"AgSummitt Il" which will showcase agricultural activities in the Coachella Valley. Cost $25 includes a
walking and bus tour, and lunch. For more information call Joann or Bill Claire at (760) 398-5110.
November 17: The Inland Empire Economic Partnership's Annual Legislative Reception is being
held at the Mission Inn Hotel, 3649 Mission Inn Ave., San Diego Room, Riverside from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.
For more information cell Margie Oswald at (909) 890-1090 ext. 236.
November 17: The NAFTA Corridor Institute is offedng a seminar entitled "Integrating the Infrastructure
on the California-Mexico Border--A Positive Co-Dependency", an event of which Inland Empire
Economic Partnership is a co-sponsor, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. in Palm Spdngs. Cost is $150.00, which
includes the seminar, continental breakfast, lunch, and materials. For more information cell (213) 623-
8274.
December 6: The Inland Empire Economic Partnership's Prospective Member and VIP Breakfast is
being held at the Mission Inn, 3649 Mission Inn Avenue, Galleria Room, Riverside, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30
a.m. Members are invited to bring a prospective member to learn why other business leaders are involved
with economic development in the Inland Empire. For more information cell Dianna Skeens at (909) 890-
1090 ext. 239.
December 13: A one-day "Business Planning Workshop" is being held in San Bemardino from 8:30 a.m.
to 10:30 a.m., free of charge. For more information cell Melanie Cote (909) 781-2345.
December 14: A one-day "Business Planning Workshop" is being held in Murfieta from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.,
free of charge. For more information cell Melanie Cote (909) 781-2345.
January 20: The Inland Empire Economic Partnership is holding its Annual Dinner "In the Spirit of
the Olympics" at California State University, San Bemardino. The event will begin at 6 p.m. and
conclude with dancing until 10 p.m. For more information cell Margie Oswald at (909) 890-1090 ext. 236.
The city of Lake Elsinore attracted two large filming events the weekend of October 7 & 8. ESPN filmed
the Vans World Wakeboard Championships that included competitors from over 23 countries. MTV filmed
their MTV Sports and Music Festival featuring two major bands and included celebrity competitors Tommy
Lee, Redman, and Gervase from "Survivor". The MTV show is set to air on Saturday, November 11,
2000.
WELCIN[ I[W PAR1Ti]iS
IEEP would like to welcome the newest members to ~e Partnership:
GYL Decauwer are accountants and business consultants who understand business and what it takes to
compete in today's marketplace. Stephen Williams, Partner, can be reached at (909) 948-9990.
PapeHess Access, Inc. is dedicated to streamlining business processes through technology leveraging,
assisting companies to exceed customer expectations and maximize profitability. This team of
professionals specializes in the implementation of strategies to keep clients ahead of the competition
without compromising existing business. Paul Walling, General Manager, can be reached at (909) 425-
2275.
Uber Advertising & Public Relations is a full service marketing, advertising, design, and public relations
firm. Carolyn Hayes Uber, President, can be reached at (909) 981-3141.
I]]I AC1]VlTY BEPOBT
Notable activity in September included nine leads, 28 inquiries, 153 Site Selector Outreaches for a total of
71 leads in vadous stages of review and consideration by Business Development...The Inland Empire
Film Commission (IEFC) registered 151 total days of film activity and 141 requests for locations, with 12
permits issued in San Bemardino County, four issued in Riverside County, and 19 issued for the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), for an economic impact of $5,281,500... The Small Business Development
Center (SBDC) reported the creation of 49 jobs for an economic impact of $2,987,841...The SBDC
counseled 200 clients for 960 client hours, and conducted 12 training events for 299 attendees.., and
Intemational Trade recorded one export action for $200,000.
On October 5th eight area school districts presented case studies on programs made possible through
$129,958 in School Enrichment Grants awarded by the Inland Empire Economic Investment
Collaborative (IEEIC). The programs teach technology, present emerging career options to students and
parents, and develop programs that teach parents to work with children in math and language arts. The
Inland Empire Economic Investment Collaborative is a program that is supported by Riverside Community
College, Riverside County Economic Development Agency, Riverside County Department of Public Social
Services, Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, San Bemardino County Jobs and Employment
Services, and San Bemardino County Superintendent of Schools.
FOggB KIO[OFF gBEAKFAST
Caspar W. Weinberger, chairman of Forbes magazine and United States Secretary of Defense from 1980
to 1987, spoke at the Mission inn on Tuesday, October 31, to promote the upcoming Inland Empire
advertising supplement that will appear in the May 28, 2001, issue of Forbes magazine. The supplement
entitled 'q'he Inland Empire: Southern California's Location for Innovation" is a joint effort between Forbes
and the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) and will focus on the economic strengths of
Riverside and San Bemardino counties. The 1999 advertising supplement in Forbes brought an
estimated 2,600 inquiries from companies interested in locating to the Inland Empire region. The working
breakfast and business investment forum drew a number of city and county representatives along with
many local business professionals.
The Inland Empire Economic Partnership is holding its Annual Dinner at 6 p.m. on Saturday, January
20, at California State University, San Bemardino. The theme for the 2001 event will be "In the Spidt of
the_Olympics". Plan now to attend this evening of dinner and dancing, which promises to be exciting,
informative and full of surprises! Sponsorships are available for the first time ever! Invitations are
forthcoming. For more information call Margie Oswald, Event Coordinator, at (909) 890-1090 ext. 236.
PROSPECTIVE Bi gl]l Am ViP BREAKFAST
A Prospective Member and VIP Breakfast is being held by the Inland Empire Economic Partnership on
Wednesday, December 6, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. at the Mission Inn, 3649 Mission Inn Avenue,
Galleda Room, in Riverside. Members are invited to bring a prospective member to learn why other
business leaders are involved with economic development in the Inland Empire. Invitations are
forthcoming. For more information call Dianna Skeens, Vice President, Membership Development, at
(909) 890-1090 ext. 239.
TIE COUNIBY TOUR
The Inland Empire Tourism Council (IETC) and the Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) have just
completed their "Weekend in the Country" tour of the Hemet, Idyllwild, and Temecula areas. The
weekend tour was developed to provide travel journalists and film scouts with enlightening information and
innovative ideas for future films and articles. In attendance were representatives from Malibu Times,
Westways Magazine, California Seniors Magazine, and RV Journal along with location scouts from Clay
Francisco Films and Clickers & Flickers Photo Tours. The tour that began on Friday and ended on
Sunday included visits to Callaway, Faulkner, Mt. Palomar, Thornton, and Wilson's Creek wineries, a hot
air balloon ride over the Temecula vineyards, a tour of the Ramona Bowl and Diamond Valley Lake in
Hemet, and an art walk and tour of Idyllwild.
HOLLYWOOD'S LABGEST BACKLOT PBESS TBF
Another successful tour organized by the Inland Empire Tourism Council (IETC) and the Inland Empire
Film Commission (IEFC) was the "Hollywood's Largest Backlot" press trip. This two-day press trip
featured an in-depth tour of movie locations in the Lake Arrowhead area, which included the UCLA
Conference Center, Ice Castle Training Center, several notable houses and the lake. The group was later
joined by Putnam Hencke, former owner of Santa's Village, who provided everyone with local history and
apprised the group of ongoing developments of the Santa's Village site. The trip concluded with a visit to
the Lake Arrowhead Octoberfest.
CALIOBMA ON LOCAIION AWARDS
Several of the state's top film location professionals, production companies and public employees were
honored at the California Film Commission's 6~ annual "California On Location Awards" ceremony held
at the Queen Mary in Long Beach on October 29~ with awards being presented in 16 different categories.
'q'he On Location awards was a salute to ali of our industry colleagues and a celebration of the production
excellence in our Golden State", said Sheri Davis, director of the Inland Empire Film Commission
(IEFC). The event began at 1 p.m. with entertainment by the "Pacific Swing Band" followed by a Tall
Ships mock sea baffle recreation between the "American Pride" and 'q'he Pilgrim". The awards
presentation closed with a spectacular fireworks show.
~ ~00~000
ECONOMIC
ALLIANCE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Madene Best
Assistant City Manager
City of Lake Elsinore
Jim O'Grady
Assistant City Manager
City of Temecula
Lod Moss
Assistant City Manager
City of Murrieta
Stevie Hirdler
Marketing Coordinator
November 9, 2000
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE
Dear Partners:
Please review this update on the marketing activities for the Alliance.
Leads:
As a result of our most recent marketing efforts, we have 9 leads from our television
commercial, 21 leads from the radio commercial, five (5) from our ad with Expansion
Management magazine, two (2) referrals, one (1) from our web-site and one (1) from the
newspaper; a total of 39 leads.
Of these leads, one lease has been signed at the Temecula/Murdeta border and one
company has met with the City of Murrieta and located a few sites of interest.
Fifty-one phone calls and/or attempts were made to follow-up. An initial package was sent to
each inquiry and a second package with specific site location information was sent out after
contact was made. If I have been unable to reach the interested business contact, I will
continue calling until contact is made.
I am currently working on a more detailed report that will outline each lead, their
requirements, source from which they heard about us, lead tracking information and status.
This report will be provided to each Partner as soon as it is completed.
IEEP
IEEP leads responded to for the month for October are as follows:
#360, 361,362, 363, 364, 366, 368, 369,370 and 371'.
Note: If a site wasn't available that met the specific requirements mentioned, a basic package was sent.
Radio:
We are currently advertising on three radio stations in the San Diego region. These spots
started Monday, October 9. These 30-second spots are aidng on KOGO, KSDO and XTRA
AM (XTRA is also broadcast in both Orange and Los Angeles Counties). We have four days
of advertising left on XTRA and one week of advertising on KOGO.
Television:
The commercials for the Alliance which started aidng on September 25, 2000, in the San
Diego region on Channel 7 dudng "Good Morning Amedca" and during the local news on
Channel have completed the contracted six weeks. A total of 192 spots aired dudng the
hours of 5:30 AM - 8:00 AM, Monday through Fdday.
Advertisin.q
The Alliance placed a % page ad in the September issues of Expansion Management and
Medical Device & Diagnostic Imaging magazines. These magazines are being distributed at
local trade shows such as Comdex and MD&M in January.
We also placed a % page ad in October's issue of Business Xpansion magazine. This
particular issue features articles on the "high tech industries". Copies of Business Xpansion
will be provided to each Partner at our next meeting in December. Along with this ad, I have
negotiated two banners on their web-site, Riverside County has been highlighted with a red-
star on the California map (there is only one red star in the state of California), and a link to
our web-site has been provided. This can be viewed at www. acn.net.
I am currently obtaining rate sheets for industry specific publication in Silicon Valley such as:
Amedcan Electronics, San Jose Chronicle, and will provide these at our next meeting.
CD-ROM
As discussed at our Partner meeting on Nov.embe.r. 8th, the CD-P,. OM_~pro. p.o~3~ils ~11 be
provided to each Partner for review by our next meeting on uecemcer u at ,~: p. . By
doing this, I can better demonstrate the proposals and answer any questions the partners
may have. Once a proposal is decided on, we will invite the selected business to give a
presentation of their proposal.
Trade Shows
On behalf of the Alliance, I recently attended the BioCom 2000 trade show in San Diego and
had great success. I hope to receive the information from the leads that were generated and
send out our packets within the next week. I will provide a summary of this information to
each Partner at our next meeting.
As of this date, the Alliance has committed to the following trade shows, which I will attend:
Comdex - Nov. 13-17
MD&M WEST 2001, January 8 - 10, 2001
Direct Mail
At the October meeting, it was determined that we will pursue a direct mail campaign. The
postcard proof is expected from the pdnters on November 10. We will have a finished
product 5 days after approval.
We will be mailing these to businesses in the Medical Device & Manufacturing industrywithin
the state of California. I will supply the same industry specific information at our next meeting
for states such as Texas and Washington.
On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings:
Manufacturer's Council
Business Relations Committee
EDC
Economic Development meetings cenceming the Southwest Riverside County region
If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909)
600-6066.
Sincerely,
Stevie Hirdler
Marketing Coordinator
Copy: Brad Hudson
Robin Zimpfer
Sarah Mundy
Robert Moran
Teresa Gallavan
CITY OF TEMECULA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Fiscal Years 2001 - 2005
CIRCULATION &
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
PROJECTS COMPLETED
FY 99~00
Total Projects Completed 31
Total Cost $ 37,369,642
PROJECTS COMPLETED
FY 99~00
PROJECTS COMPLETED
FY 99~00
{continued)
CIRCULAT)ON
· Overland Drive Improvements & Margarita Rd
· 1-15 Southbound Off-Ramp
Widening/Auxitiary Lane Rancho Calif Rd
· Rancho Caiif Rd Interchange Additional
Improvements
CIP PROJECTS FOR 200'1 TO 2005
· Circulation 55
· Infrastructure 18
· Parks 33
· RDA 1~2
Total Projects 118
PRESENTATION FORMAT
· Construction Projects
· Projects In DesignlPlanning With
Construction Funding
· Projects In Design/Planning Without
Construction Funding
Total 5-Year Funded
Projects
INFRA-
TION
14%
56%
Total Funded Projects: $113,425,560
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
CIRCULATION
· First Street Bridge
PROJECTS IN DESIGN/PLANNING
WITH CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
:[RCULATION
· Diaz Rd Extension
· Murrleta Creek Interim Low Flow Crossing (Via
Montezuma)
· Diaz Rd Realignment to Vincent Moraga Drive
· Pauba Rd Improvements to Support Library Site
· Rancho Calif Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek
PROJECTS IN DESIGN/PLANNING
WITH CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
CIRCULATION
· Margarita Rd Improvements - Phase I (Plo
Pico to 79 South)
· Pavement Management System Jefferson
Avenue
· Traffic Signal Interconnect Upgrade
· Intersection Traffic Monitoring System
· Pala Rd Improvements - Phase II (Pala Bridge
to Via Eduardo) add Fourth Lane Interim
PROJECTS IN DESIGNIPLANNING
WITH CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
CIRCULATION
Winchester at Margarita Rd (Add 2nd Eastbound to Northbound
Left Tum Movement)
1-15 Winchester Rd No~hbound On-Ramp Add Second On-Ram
Lane
Winchestar/Jefferson Avenue Additional Widening Add Turning
Movements
· Southern Cross Roads Sidewalk (Grant Application Approved)
PROJECTS IN DESIGN/PLANNING
WITHOUT CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
CIRCULATION
· Murrlets Creek Bridge Crossing North of
Winchester Rd
· 1-15179 South Ultimate interchange
· Date/Cherry Street Intsrim Southbound Off-Ramp to
Jefferson Avenue - Phase I Through Phase III
PROJECTS IN DESIGN/PLANNING
WITHOUT CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
CIRCULATION
· Murrlets Creek Bridge Between Rancho Calif Rd
and Winchester Rd-
· Rainbow Canyon South Interchange (Feasibility
Study Only)
· Rancho Way Extension from Diaz to Margarita Rd
(Alignment Study)
· Pala Rd Ultimate Six Lane Improvements
2000
TB M B C ~O £A VA £ L B o[
~ALLOOH ~ WIHB
GBSTIVAL
TA ~ L B o y C O HTB HTS
I.
II.
III.
IV.
q~estival Marketing Summary
'Sponsorship 5~laterials
Press Releases
Clippings
2000
~BST~VA£
SPOHSOR S~)MMA Rff'
qVith sincere appreciation for your support
and contribution to the success of the event.
Temecula Valley
Balloon & Wine
Festival
June 9th ~ 11 th 2000
What is it7
A tradition since 1984, the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival welcomes
guests from all over Southern California to dance to music, laugh with downs, fly in our
balloons and camp at beautiful Lake Skinner.
Hot Air Balloons
Over $0 colorful balloons launch from gra.~y fields of Lake Skinner Recreation
Area Saturday and Sunday mornings. Enjoy a flight over Temecula's Wine Country during
the vineyard's spring bloom. Take a "tethered" ride where you soar I00 feet above the
revival crow&
Dancing Balloon Glows
The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival is the only ballooning event known
to produce "dancing balloons". Watch as the balloon pilots, with perfect synchronization,
ignite their balloon burners to a musical beat of rock and pop tunes illuminating the pitch
black sky with brilliant color.
Wine Tasting
Taste Temecula Valley's finest premium wines, including sparkling wines.
Something For Everyone
Top Musical Entefftainment, Hot Air Balloon Launch, Balloon F~ghts & Tethered
Rides, Arts & Crafts, Kids Faire, Balloon Glow, Jazz & Blues Music, Wine Tasting, Micro-
brewery Tasting & KY Camping.
0
0
2000 TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & WINE FESTIVAL
MARKETING SUMMARY
An outstanding festival attendance of 38,000 can be attributed in part to a
comprehensive marketing campaign, which included the following
elements:
PRINT ADVERTISING
Sponsorship agreements were reached with both the Press-Enterprise
and The Californian, resulting in $17,000 of sponsored advertising space
plus special editorial sections promoting the festival. Other promotional
relationships with The Recycler and Orange County Weekly resulted in
sponsored or discounted ad space valued at an additional $1,900.
Advertising was also placed in Los Angeles Weekly, San Bernardino Sun,
San Diego Reader, Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register.
BROADCAST ADVERTISING & PROMOTIONS
A promotional relationship was established with Adelphia Cable,
involving a media buy and promotion that resulted in more than 450
commercials and 280 promotional spots, distribution of 800 tickets to new
Adelphia subschbers, production of promo spots, and Festival mentions in
various Adelphia marketing materials.
Media buys and promotions were arranged with the following radio
stations: Arrow 93, K-EARTH, Mega 100, K~V, KSYR, KFRG, KATY,
Lite 92.7, KVCR, KIFM, Oldies 94.9, and the Desert Radio Group. In
addition to paid commercial time, several stations were Festival and stage
sponsors, promoting ticket give-aways, contests and 'on-site broadcasts, with
some promotions starting a month prior to the event.
Utilizing the Southern California Broadcasters Association's
recognition of the Festival as a non-profit organization by issuing it an
SCBA #, 15 and 30 second radio public service spots were written and
distributed to Southern California radio stations.
PUBLICITY
An extensive outreach to print and broadcast media outlets was begun
six months before the Festival and continued up to the Festival weekend.
Local, regional and national media lists were updated fi.om the previous
year, and personal contact was made with all key entertainment and calendar
editors.
A flow of news releases and information to key outlets began in
December, 1999. From then until the festival weekend, approximately 18
separate releases and related documents were created about various aspects
of the event. These were disseminated to media singly or in press packets,
augmented by collateral materials as appropriate, including talent
photographs and a photo of the souvenir poster.
Specialized distributions of posters, press materials, ticket vouchers,
or other enclosures, were sent to editors of travel sections at California
newspapers and television shows and news depmhnents throughout
Southern California.
The public relations firm worked one-on-one with a w/de variety of
media, to' answer questions and provide information and materials to meet
their needs and deadlines, and to e-mail materials where requested.
Clippings continue to be compiled, but print publicity coverage was
deemed excellent. Television coverage included several segments on KABC
as well as mentions on KTTV and KCOP.
PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
Fliers/Posters
50,000 Fliers (8 1/2 x 11) and 1000 Event Posters (18 x 24) were
produced and distributed to promote the event.
One component of the distribution was a mailing to the members of
the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, offering them materials to
promote the Festival to their own customers. In response to this mailing,
requests were received for 21,778 Fliers, and 164 Posters.
Sponsors of the Festival along with members of the Temecula Rotary
displayed fliers and posters in their businesses.
Newsletters
Two Festival newsletters were produced: 1,350 March Newsletters
(4 pages) and 1,350 May Newsletters (6 pages), were distributed to
members/business of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce.
Programs
15,000 Programs were distributed to Festival guests.
VONS STORES
A promotional parmership was arranged with Vons,stores throughout
Southern California. This promotion included banners, signs and aisle
displays in Vons 240 stores from Santa Barbara to the Mexican border.
Banners were up in the month of May and first part of June. Festival
promotion was included in Vons in-store guide the week of June 7, 2000.
The promotion also included offering a $2.00 ticket discount with a Vons
Club card selected Riverside County stores also sold tickets. The Festival
was promoted in the Vons circular distributed to households throughout
Southern California the week of May 31, 2000.
LONGS DRUG STORES
The Festival was promoted in the Longs Drug Store circular
distributed to households throughout Southern California the week of May
22, 2000.
TICKETMASTER
A promotional partnership was arranged with Ticketmaster, including
the following elements:
Inclusion in Hot Sheet
Inclusion in Entertainment Weekly Magazine
Inclusion in Ticketmasters website - direct link to Festival site
Deal of the Week for San Diego for May 30 - June 5, 2000:
Ticketmaster SignOnSanDiego and KyXy provided:
Marketing and promotion of the program
Prominent exposure on SignOnSanDiego homepage
Prominent exposure on the Ticketmaster.corn homepage
Exposure on Ticketmaster.com Giveaways Page
TEMECULA TODAY
The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival was featured in the
April issue of Temecula Today; the newsletter for the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce.
FESTIVAL WEBSITE
The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival website provided
comprehensive information and was regularly updated and will continue to
be updated. The website included general information, entertainment line-
up, listing of board members, directions, links to sponsors as well as the 17
year history of the Festival.
I11111
; UllCkers ~ PllCKers Fnotograpnlc l'~etworK - llue rage
I1
www. c lic ke rsa ndflicke rs. com
E-mail- photographer®cHckersandflickers.com
Clickers E Flickers Photography Network, Inc. - The foLLowing terms used to describe us:
Photography / Camera / Foto / Picture / Photo / Pix - Network, Organization, Association, Society and a CLub.
We feature NewsLetters, Workshops, FieLd Trips, Events, Dinners, Lectures, Products, Services, Equipment and
a Photo GaLLery.
We focus on the fo[Lowing areas of photography: AeriaL, Architecture, AnimaLs / WiLdLife, Candid,
CommerciaL, DigitaL, ExperimentaL, Fashion, Fine Art, Historical / CoLLectibLe, Humor, Landscape, Marquis
Gothic / Fetish, Nature, People / Portrait, Photojournaiism, Sports and Underwater.
We highlight a Photographer of the Month on the Web, Photographers for hire, Reviews of current
Photography Books, Events, Museum Exhibits, Showings and GaLLery Openings.
We are endorsed by FiLm Manufacturers, Film Product SuppLiers, Camera Stores, Equipment SuppLiers,
Laboratories that process and print film, Darkroom rental Locations as weLL as Museums, GaLLeries, Camera
Shows and most importantly our Members.
http://www.clickersandflickers.com/ 10/31/2000
. tSllCKers ~ l-liCKerS lNews ."age x-.~ x m ~
Clickers E Flickers Photographic Network, Inc.
A/Lb, IN NEWS PAGE I - Website Changes
This website was updated on: October 22, 2000
2000 - Photographic Dinner Event:
*Payment ~t Reservations are required in advance. C~ickers E Flickers' photography dinners are open to everyone, especially people with a
common interest of photography. Beginners~ amateur photographers and professionals are welcome. Reservations and payment are
required at [east seventy-t~vo (72) hours prior to the event No Exceot~on$, f:hls is because every dinner th~s year has sold out.
The Clickers & Flickers'Dinner ~Ha$ An Exciting New Venue. BEVERLY GARLAND'STM
Holiday Inn® Universal Studios Hollywood®. Learn More When You Make Reservations. Effective
Immediately !!! (A Map was included in the October-November newsletter.)
"Return of the Blue-Eyed Indian I"
Clickers E Flickers' - Guest Speaker Lee Marmon, Storyteller/Native American Indian
Photographer for 53 years, (his images have preserved forever the Vanishing
Pueblos) presents: "Vanishing Pueblos, Cultures and Vistas: Photography of
America's Native Southwest" - P_r_es~s Releas_e_~J_f_Qr~ore d~e_taj[s, This_DJ~0er~EveEtjs
~n__(~edr~esda~),~N_oy~ernb_er_t.5.,_2000. Visit his ~uest gallery.
Watch For: "A Weekend In The Country"
~. A [eature story highlighting exciting photography adventures in The Inland Empire
- Temecula, Hemet and Idyllwild. (Less than 96 miles from Los Angeles.)
http://www.clickersandflickers.com/news 1 .htm 10/31/2000
· ~ Cli¢lcers & Flickers News Page Page 2 of 4
Plan a trip and enjoy:
Temecula - hot air balloon rides, friendly wine tasting in the country, outdoor jazz
festivals, beautiful Old Town, the historical museum, vintage vehicles and weekend
car shows.
Idyllwild - the historic iron garden (early farm and railroad items), the Idyllwild Arts
Festival and Wine Tasting, a weekend cabin in the mountains.
Hemet - Diamond Valley Reservoir and The Ramona Pageant.
"~ C&F Members find a list of activities and phone numbers within the Inland
Empire, featured in our October/November newsletter. Get Your 34embership
started now (626-794-7447).
Members Fine Art Photographic Gallery: Preview Other Galleries Newt Clickers E Flickers'
Fine Art Photographic Gallery - a window on the world of photography.
Clickers
Clickers
Clickers
Clickers
Clickers
Clickers
Clickers
Clickers
Clickers
Et Flickers - Fine Art Gallery: Criteria
E Flickers - Guest Ftne Art Gallery #A: Steven Diet Goedde
E Flickers - Guest Ftne Art Gallery #B: Coltn McNulty
Et Flickers - Guest Fine Art Gallery #C
Et Flickers - Guest Fine Art Gallery #D
Et Flickers - Guest Fine Art Gallery #E
Et Flickers - Guest Fine Art Gallery #F
Et Flickers - Fine Art Gallery: Subject
: Jim Zuckerman
: Michael Chtlders
: Howard L. Btngham
: Lee Marmon (NEW)
Et Flickers - Fine Art Gallery: Members
® Albert Broccoli, Executive Producer and Michael Wilson, Writer/Producer.
Clickers & Flickers'. Guest Speaker Michael G. Wilson, producer/screenwriter/filmmaker (James
Bond motion picture series). Michael is an international photography collector/expert who
discussed - "A Passionate Experience: The Art of Investing Et Collecting Photography" - Press Re[ease
#1 for more details.
Newsletter: Clickers E Flickers' Newsletters will be mai[ed on October 7th, October/November, Volume XVll, Number 5. Members if you
have not received it by October 12th, please E-mai[ or telephone. A Sample newsletter page is located under ~N_ewsleLt~C on this webs/re.
http://www, clickersandflickers.com/news 1 .htm 10/31/2000
Clickers & Flickers News Page Page 3 of 4
Table of Contents: I~1 Clickers ~: Flickers' Website has a Table of Contents so that you can locate
all items (105 pages of information) on this website.
Announcements Et Business Cards:
~This Section - Limited to Clickers E Flickers' Newstetter Advertisers (3x min.), who are also resistered Members Products/
Events/Specials.] Advertisers are listed in four locations - The News Page, Table of Contents, Event~ News PaBe and this new set,on
for Advertiser Announcements E Business Cards.
Mystery Photographer:
Main Events News Page #1 Et Museum Gallery_:
Main Events News Page #2 Et Museum Gallery:
Commercial Photograp~hy Gallery~
Advertiser Announcements:
Photography Trip:
C{ickers ~ F(ickers ~sits ~e "U.S. * S~ce Shu~e." A rare oppor~ni~ ~ visit and pho~raph ~e Shu~le Columbia up-close. (So
close we needed a 6mm lens.) Visit the N~A Galle~ - Click shut~e image.
Please visit our friends, the ne~ time you need price, se~ice and quali~
(Click each images to enlarge.)
~p://~.clickersa,dffickcrs.co~,ews],~ ]0/31/2000
October 23, 2000
ECONOMIC
CITYOF T· ·
EMECULA.
New businesses find. home,
others, eager to expand
Temecula is a very enticing
place to raisea family and do
business. Strategically located
along the Interstate 15/Interstate
215 corridor, Temecula is consid-
ered to be one of Southern
California's most prosperous corn~
munitles, offering a superb quality
of life.
The city is rich in history and
alive With promise f6r the future.
This economically vibrant communi-
ty boasts tremendous assets: beauti-
ful scenery,-a thriving business cli-
mate, abundant recreational and
cultural opportunities, excellent
schools, low crime rate and a boom-
ing tgurism Industry.
Temecula continues to report
impressive'gro~ In the retail,
manufacturing and high tech sec-
tors. In Temecula, bus~'messes and
developers are provided:the kind of
space and healthy envir0~ent they
need to grow and prosper:.:
Committed to local expansion,
such prominent companies as
Chemicon International, Milgard
Manufacturing and Plant Equipment
have experienced significant
growth:
Chemicon International, a pri-
vately held lif6 science research and
diagnostic products compkny, '
recently moved fi.om its 30,000-
square-foot facility to a newly
expanded 84.000-square-foot show-
case facility located across the
street.
. Milgard 'Manufacturing,'the
l~gest windo~v manufacturing com-
pany in the western United States,
has completed its $5.5 million
expanSion. The 123,000-square-foot
plant is located a half-mile fi.om its
current facility. Milgard currently
employs about 165 people and
expects to increase employment to
more than 200.
Plant Equipment's expansion
Includes a new 25,000-square-foot
Please see TEMECULA, page 1lB
researc~ end devel°P~ent:bu~'d~
Temec~a ~ 52.~ ~e
f~t ~d b~Plo~ ~o~ 2~.
~m~y ~at ~ppH~ 911'em~
gen~ s~ m ~ce ~d
deP~enm.
~reio~ i~ f~es ~
:P~y, U.S. ~emop~
-~?:~eme~a h~ one of~e'
· ~d ~P~. A~r~g to ~e
'3J~fi~'~fi'r~ ~eS have ~ou-
~ bled ~ ~e ~ of'TemecMa
' ~e~ dec~e,, even ~out
pr~ence 'of
Lar~o:~e~op~ned in
:l~ge~ ~ ~e fo~er Temec~a
~re. Co~ emplo~ appro~- .
' ~Jy 340 people~
* Temec~a~s 105,7~-s~e.
foot Home Depot ~at.opened ~
Se~er ~ ~e 15~ s~re'~
~e ~re, w~ s~ ~ut
50,~ home ~provement prod-
ucC, ~ employ ~ut 150 peo-
opbned i~ d~om~ AUnt, offer-
~g 16.000 s~e feet 0f se~g
sp~e ~ed ~h0me dec,r,
decorafive~ ~d go--et
foo~ ~d ~verages ~po~d
kern 50 ~es ~o~d ~e
orld. ~e new ~re m~ ~e
e~er s t 13~ ~ore na~on~
* ~ J~y, S~ M~. a new
ua~0n~ ~e~ S~re, jo~ed ~e
Jim O'Grad~ assistant city
manager of Ternecula. may be
"' ' re ach~ ,at, (909) : 5 08.$ t O0.
:REAM:
onte Creamery, Redlands
~rt of the Inland Empire sits an oasis of delectable delights. Bring your taste buds and pre-
dulged. Piemonte Creamery, located in historic downtown Redlands, has become the place
~fter-dinner treat or to escape the heat.
Creamery serves up icy sorbets and creamy gelato, the Italian-style ice cream known for its
t gooey, texture and intense flavor. Made with fresh ingredients such as milk, cream and
,ite of Piemonte gelato delivers a rich, lingering flavor sensation.
election! Piemonte Creamery boasts 48 flavors, with each selection softly swirled into a
~ors include cherries and cream, cappuccino, mint chocolate chip, vanilla rum raisin, hazel-
), and the house specialty, chocolate piemonte, a to-die-for chocolate with caramel and
ids. There's even sugar-free chocolate and vanilla. The sorbets include watermelon, rasp-
lemon and mango. Having trouble deciding between amaretto and duice de leche? The
iendly staff is armed with tasting spoons so you can sample the flavors before you buy.
most popular flavors are strawberries and
la split, and the famous chocolate :-,-
)ierino Garberoglio emigrated from his
nte, Ital); to Argentina, where he opened a
~eries [eaturing the famous Italian gelato.
good. in 1984, son Carlos' family Jmmi-
United States, and in May 2000, under
nent of sons Pedro and German, opened
onte Creamery in Redlands. With this suc-
beroglio family is looking to expand within
~pire. Gelato fans, reioice there may be a
!amery coming to your neighborhood]
Creamery is located at 625 Orange St. in
edlands and is open 10 a.m.-10:30 p.m.
~gh Thursday and 10 a.m.-17:30 p.m.
~turday. Information: 909.307.8895.
Un, 5~ is all smiles over her cherries
rom Piemonte Creamery in Redlands.
herrine Lawyer
CITY FOR
FAMILIES:
Temecula
By Ruth Planoy
People come to Temecula in search of an afford-
able dream home. But it is the dear, blue sky and
other quality of llfe features that cinch the deal and
convince people the long commute to work is
worth it.
As one of the fastest-growing cities in California,
Temecula has one of the lowest crime rates The
school district is among the best in the tnlan~d
Empire and there are two hospitals just minutes
away.
An impressive new stone and iron arch greets visi-
tors to Old Town. The center plaque reads "Est.
1859," but the Luiseno Indians enjoyed the bounty
of a place "where the sun breaks through the mist."
They lived on the land for centuries before the
Spaniards and others set up stakes.
Today, there are far more people, much more
activity. Every Saturday morning, the Farmer's
Market wakes O!d Town up early. Perch yourself on a wood rai~
lng and watch a staged gunfight, hop on a horse-drawn carriage
or browse through Oid Town's many antique stores Each spring.
hundreds of gleaming autos line Front Street for the Rod Run a~;d
the Fourth of July Parade is true hometown America.
The west side of town is home to the Pro Rodeo with bucking
Brahmas and the Tractor Race where man and machine fight it
outin the mud.
The city has almost doubled in size since 1990, and now has a
population of .53,800. Its library is the busiest in the Riverside
County system. The business sector has kept pace: Unique bou-
tiques, large retail stores and the Promenade Ma!! make shopping
convenient for everything from a new car to a new dress.
Restaurants include fine dining and ethnic eateries as well as the
usual fast:food establishments. Catch a movie at one of the sever-
al dozen theater screens or at the International Film Festival.
Relax with a picnic during the symphony concerts in the park.
Tee up at one of many golf courses. Tour the Parade of Homes
and steal a few decorator tips from the pros, or float th;ough the
air in a hot air balloon at the Balloon and Wine Festival.
If the hustle and bustle of
city life gets to you, drive a few
minutes in any direction into the
rolling hills dotted with horse
ranches, vineyards, citrus and avo-
cado groves.
Temecula's central location
means that minor-league baseball,
casino gambling, award-winning
wineries, horse shows, fishing,
boating and hiking are all within
30 minutes. I-1 £ cuts right
through town and is a lifeline to
jobs and more attractions within a
two-hour radius, such as three
international airports, the beach
and ski slopes, and several col-
leges.
Temecula's lifestyle is as diverse
as its population and offers some
thing for everyone year-round.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE_~_~_
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Howard Windsor, Battalion Chief
November 28, 2000
Monthly Departmental Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's
Monthly Activity Report for the month of October, 2000.
Temecula Fire Services
Monthly Activity Statistics
Month OCTOBER Year 2000
Structure Fires 4 8 5 0 17
Vehicle Fires 2 3 0 2 7
Vegetation Fires 6 6 4 2 18
Other Fires 4 5 6 0 15
Medical Aids 83 47 35 81 246
Traffic Collisions 23 24 0 9 56
False Alarms 24 32 5 7 68
Fire Menace Standbys 5 6 3 0 14
Public Service Assists 4 11 3 10 28
Assists and Covers 14 25 3 4 46
Totals: '169 167 64 '115 515
Community Activities 0 I 0 2 3
School Programs 10 0 0 13 23
Fairs and Displays 0 0 0 0 0
Company Inspections 103 62 0 15 180
LE-38 Dooryard Inspections 0 0 0 0 0
Fire Investigations 6 0 8 4 18
Burning Permits Issued 11 0 2 7 20
Preplans 8 0 1 2 11
I
Totals: 138 63 11 43 255
Form B15-1 (4/99)
By: Carl Calderon
Date: 11/3/00
Total Runs for the Month:
Medical Aids
Traffic Collisions
Public Service Assists
Fire Menace Standby's
Structure Fires
Ringing Alarms
Vegetation Fires
Vehicle Fires
Hazardous Materials
Average Response Time
Longest Response Time
MEDIC SQUAD 84 MONTHLY RESPONSE SUMMARY
October 2000
231
163
38
4
1
5
17
0
0
1
5.26 Minutes
12 Minutes
Medic Squad Cancelled Prior To Patient Contact: 64 Times
Medical Aid Responses with Medic Squad on scene prior to AMR: 73 Times
Performed Advance Life Support: 33 Times
Comments:
Medic Squad 84 responded to a total of 231 calls in the Month of June. 201 of those calls
were for Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions. Of those calls, the Medic Squad was cancelled 64
times or 31% of the time. The Medic Squad arrived on scene prior to AMR 73 times or 36% of
the time and initiated ALS care prior to AMR's arrival on 31 calls. The average wait time for an
AMR unit on these calls was 4.4 minutes after the arrival of the Medic Squad. On two occasions,
the Medic Squad was on scene greater than 10 minutes before the arrival of AMR. The longest
wait for an AMR unit was 17 minutes. Medic Squad 84 had 2 response times of over 10
minutes, the longest of which was 16 minutes. The delayed responses for the Medic Squad were
both inw 83's PRA.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC.~~__~
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
November 16, 2000
Monthly Report
The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department in the month of October 2000.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
New Cases
The Division received 51 new applications for administrative, other minor cases and home
occupations and new applications for public hearings during the month of October. The new pubtic
hearing cases are as follows:
Development Plan 12
General Plan Amendment and
Change of Zone 1
Conditional Use Permit 2
Extension of Time 1
Status of Major Projects
Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and prepare the following
cases for public hearing before the Planning Director or Planning Commission:
The Villages of Temecula - The design and construction of 160-unit, 2-story apartment
complex w/clubhouse and pool, on the south side of Rancho California Road, between Cosmic
Drive and south extension of Moraga, east of the proposed Temecula Ridge Apartments and
Staff intends to hold an informal meeting with adjacent property owners to receive input
regarding concerns and suggestions.
· Planned Development Overlay proposal for an office/retail component along Rancho California
Road.
Harveston (Formally known as Sweetwater - Lennar Communities) Specific Plan, General Plan
Amendment and Development Agreement- located northerly of Santa Gertrudis Creek and west
of Chapparal High School. Project is currently under review.
R:\M ONTH LY.RP'D~.000\OCTOB E R, 2000.doc
1
Rancho Community Church expansion on Vallejo Avenue..The project is on hold, as the
applicant is still looking at other alternatives for their development. The applicant met with staff
in January to discuss potential options.
Wolf Valley Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, and
Tentative Tract Map - Planning Commission recommendation for denial on October 4, 2000 will
be reconsidered on December 6, 2000 following renoticing of Public Hearing.
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: The results of an
independent feasibility study analyzing the viability of the formation of an assessment district for
the construction of off-site infrastructure was evaluated by the City Council Ad Hoc Committee.
Upon the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee the City Council, at its September 12,
2000 meeting, instructed staffto resume processing the project. Staff has received the revised
specific plan document and development agreement.
Meadowview Golf Course -On June 7, 2000, the Planning Commission continued the case off
calendar at the request of the applicant. The applicant is preparing a focused EIR.
Temecula Ridge Apartments - The design and construction of 246 apartment units on 22.21
acres on the south side of Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road. This project was
appealed and the appeal upheld by the Council on 10-10-2000. The case will be reconsidered
by the City Council on 11-28-2000.
Hilton Garden Hotel - To construct a 100-room hotel on 1.38 acres located on the westerly side
of Rancho Highland Drive, westerly of Ynez Road. The accompanying General Plan
Amendment is on hold with the City Council.
Overland Self Storage - Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the design,
construction and operation of a 43,174 square foot mini-self storage facility with office, resident
manager's quarters and RV storage spaces located approximately 155 feet north of the
intersection of Commerce Center Drive and Overland Drive. DRC meeting was held on
January 27, 2000. The applicant's representative resubmitted plans on 11-06-2000.
Palomar Hotel - Remodel of the existing Palomar Hotel to the Palomar Inn (a bed and
breakfast) located on the northeast corner of Front and Fifth Streets. DRC meeting was held
on January 27, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal.
Southern California Storage - To build a 65,000 square foot self-storage facility intending to
serve the commercial and industrial businesses. Located on Winchester Road west of Diaz
Road. Resubmitted plans for review on May 31,2000. Meeting with the applicant was held on
August 16, 2000 and Staff is still awaiting a re-submittal.
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay - Proposal by the applicant to
change 33 acres zoned for Professional Office use to a mixed used zone, which will allow
for commercial and residential uses. The Planning Commission has reviewed this project
and recommended approval to the City Council. City Council will review a settlement
agreement and the General Plan Amendment for Via Rio Temecula at the 11-28-00
meeting.
Keeton Trust office building design and construct two story 15,883 sq. ft. office building located
on Enterprise Circle North. DRC was held August 10, 2000. Staff is awaiting resubmittal.
R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2000\OCTOBER, 2000.do¢
2
Johnny Carino's - A 7,383 sq. ft., 228 seat Italian Restaurant on Pad H at the Promenade Mall.
DRC was held August 31, 2000. This project was approved by the Planning Commission on
11-15-00.
Temecula Corporate Centre - A campus of office and industrial spec. buildings at the southeast
corner of Business Park Dr. and Rancho Way. DRC meeting was held on October 12, 2000,
and applicant has submitted revised exhibits for staff review.
· Waltz Industrial Building - A 9,000 square foot concrete tilt-up facility for N/C Industries located
on the Southside of Roick Drive and west of Winchester Road.
· Margarita Medical - A proposal for 12,319 square foot medical office complex on the southeast
corner of N. General Kearney and Margarita Road.
Accel/Gentek Industrial Bldg.- A proposal to build two attached tilt-up industrial buildings
totaling 33,527 square feet on two one acre lots on the south side of Winchester Road and west
of Diaz Road.
Sunridge Community Church - To design, construct and operate a 88,918 s.f. religious
facility in two phases for worship, programs, Sunday school, weddings and funerals,
consisting of a single-stow, 1,500-seat auditorium with nursery; a two-stow, 21-room
education facility for elementary through junior high grades; a single-stow, 9,840 s.f. multi-
purpose building with kitchen, lockers and assembly room; a two-stow, 10,622 s.f.
administration and Sunday school building; a single-stow, 6,163 s.f. youth center building;
and a single-stow, 1,040 s.f. storage and maintenance building. The proposed site is on
the west side of the extension of Butterfleld Stage Road, 1,400 feet north of Rancho
California Road. Project is scheduled for DRC on 11-30-00.
Etco Plaza - To design and construct two spec buildings, each at 23,500 s.f., on two lots on
the east side of Madison Avenue at the end of Sanborn Avenue. Project is scheduled for
DRC on 11-30-00.
Scotts Manufacturing Facility - To design, construct and operate a 410,000 square foot
industrial building in which Scotts will manufacture plastic lawn care products, warehouse
and distribute durable goods for the do-it-yourself lawn and garden care market. Approved
by the Planning Commission 11-15-00.
Palomar Village Shopping Center Facelift - Pre-Application conducted with applicant to
change colors, materials, facades and signage. Staff indicated that adjacent HOAs would
be invited to comment before a formal application is approved by the Planning Director.
The Villages @ Paseo del Sol (Home Depot) - A request for a determination of substantial
conformance is going before the Planning Commission regarding changes to the approved
layout of the village center portion of the project.
· Captain's Cabin Renovation - DRC was held on 8-3-00 and staff is working with the
applicant to resubmit revised exhibits for approval by the Planning Director.
Small Business Assistance
· Rhythm and Brews: Staff has continued to help the owner of this proposed brew pub in Old
Town resolve several problems with his plan check. The plumbing, electrical mechanical and
R:\MONTHLY.RPT~2000\OCTOBER, 2000.doc
3
structural permits for this project have been issued. This business is scheduled to open in late
November.
Mad Madeline's: Staff has worked with the designer of new signs for this business located in
Old Town. Suggestions for colors, text and materials have been made to the owners.
Rockin Baja Lobster: Advised owner/applicant of this business regarding what was required to
submit a minor conditional use permit application for the addition of a dance floor to this existing
restaurant. Helped him obtain the necessary documents and called Health Department to
clarify requirements.
· Sagebrush Center: Met with owner regarding a fa(;ade improvement, sign program and
expansion of this commercial property in Old Town.
Special Events Permits
· Farmer's Market: Staff helped the organizers of this event obtain a permanent permit for this
weekly event in Old Town.
· Inland Empire Race for the Cure: Staff monitored the progress of this temporary use permit,
held organizational meetings and prepared documents for road closures.
Tractor Race at Northwest Sports Park: Staff aided applicant in preparing a preliminary
application and site plans for this event. An organizational meeting was held with all involved
departments and the applicant.
Massage Establishment Permits
La Papillion Spa located at 28751 Rancho California Road is requesting approval of a new
massage establishment permit. The Police Department has reported that the owner's
fingerprints need to be reprocessed. A new set of prints is currently being evaluated.
· Golden Touch Massage located at 28274 Old Town Front Street was issued a one-year
Massage Establishment Permit.
Special Proiects & Long Range Planning Activities
The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both
private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or
environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major
special projects and long range planning activities are as follows:
Housing Element Update: The City has received a draft of the City's Regional Housing Need
Assessment obligations and staff has provided corrections to the text. A joint City
Council/Planning Commission work session was held on August 1, 2000. The final draft
Element is being prepared for transmittal to the State and for the Planning Commission's
consideration.
· Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: The consultant has
gathered much of the information needed to begin preparation of the Draft BR.
Comprehensive General Plan Update: Four proposals have been received in response to the
follow-up RFP. Consultant interviews are being set up for the month of December.
R:\MONTH LY.RPT~2000\OCTOBER, 2000.doc
4
Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: Final changes are being made prior to
scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop in the fall of 2000. This item is on
hold pending additional staff resources.
Vail Ranch Annexation: At the September 28, 2000 LAFCO hearing the item was once again
continued to the October 26th meeting. The annexation was approved by LAFCO at their
November 16, 2000 hearing.
Surface Mining Ordinance: The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based
upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration.
This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
Application Fee Study: Staff has provided information to the consultant and Finance
Department about which applications should not be charged the full-cost of processing, and
several items still need to be corrected.
· Hillside Development Policy: The policies are being examined for integration into the draft
grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Western Riverside County: Councilman
Naggar and Planning Staff are attending committee meetings and monitoring the process of
determining conservation reserve needs. Comments regarding these meetings are presented
during Council Business on the last meeting of the month.
Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance: The Planning Commission considered this
Ordinance amendment at their February 2, 2000 meeting. This item is on hold pending
additional staff resources.
· Citywide Sign Inventory: The process of inventorying signs is pending additional staff
resources.
County Project Reviews: Staff continues to allocate significant resources to review projects
within the County and other local jurisdictions that could affect the City of Temecula.
Information regarding these projects will be forwarded under separate cover labeled Projects of
Concern.
· Helium Balloon Ordinance Amendment: As directed by the City Council, this item will be
scheduled for the Planning Commission later this year.
General Plan Annual Report: Staff is reviewing the implementation measures from the General
Plan and preparing to meet with the other departments and the City Council Subcommittee. A
draft of the Report will go to the Council in December.
· Southside Specific Plan: This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
· General Plan Amendments
· Rancho Highlands Drive. The request to modify the Land Use Map is expected to go back to
the City Council in December.
· A request to delete Via Rio Temecula west of Avenida de Missiones from the Circulation Map.
R:\MONTHLY.RP'~2000\OCTOBER, 2000.doc
5
This item will be presented to the Council in November.
Geographic Information System (GIS) Activities
· Staff continues with ongoing data layer maintenance.
· Staff is continuing in its efforts for the ultimate implementation of the Fire Department's
MaxResponder routing and pre-plan system. GIS and Fire Department staff conducted
training on the programs mobile unit and data maintenance components. Live testing on the
mobile fire units is scheduled to take place the week of November 20~h.
· Staff conducted a live citywide demonstration/training session for the MapObjects program.
Staff, throughout the City, is now utilizing it.
· GIS and Fire Department staff met with representatives of the County's GIS to discuss the
possibility of receiving improved street centerline data to support the MaxResponder efforts.
Recent mapping products include:
Maps showing property ownership for the proposed Cherry Street Interchange for
Public Works.
A series of maps showing proposed modifications to the Vail Ranch annexation.
A series of maps indicating the properties involved in a DIF agreement with the
Westside Business Center.
A map showing Council and Commissions packet delivery routes.
Flood plain maps for the Pala Road 79(S) area for Public Works.
A vicinity map of Southern California for the Attorney General's tour of the Temecula
area.
R:\MONTH LY.RPT~2.000\OCTOBER, 2000.doc
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~
CITY MANAGER /.~Y .~ '
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 28, 2000
Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public
Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of October 2000.
MOACTRPT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
October / November 2000
Prepared By: Amer Attar
Submitted by: William G. Hughes
Date: November 28, 2000
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. First Street Bridge
This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction
of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection of First Sfreet,
Old Town Front Street, and Santiago Road will be signalized. The Contractor has completed the bridge soffit
(bottom) concrete pour. Construction of bridge deck formwork is underway, with sewer, water and electric
utilities being placed through bridge cells. Work on the EMWD lift station is continuing. Storm drain work
along Santiago Road is complete with paving on the westside of Front 'scheduled for the beginning of
December.
2. Pala Road Bridge
The new Pala Road Bridge is now open to through traffic. Record of survey and monument placement is
pending.
3. Sports Park Tot Lot Equipment Replacement
The installation of the play equipment is complete. The Notice of Completion will be presented to the City
Council at their December 12 meeting.
4. Rancho California Sports Park Parking Lot Rehabilitation
The project is complete and the parking lot is now open to the public. Notice of completion is pending.
5. FY99-2000 Pavement Management System, Various Streets
This is a new project to reconstruct roadway pavement on Ynez Road between Santiago Road and La Paz
Street. The project is complete. Staff will recommend project acceptance by Council at the December 12
meeting.
6. Old Town Parking Lot
TruGreen began construction on the parking lot on October 2, 2000. Placement of electrical and water
conduit is complete with the concrete pour of light pole bases underway. Concrete curb and gutter pour is
scheduled for the fourth week of November, with asphalt paving occurring mid December.
R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\CIP\2000\October
7. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III
This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor
of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, and two
new second floor restrooms. Construction will also include a single story office space addition. All Bids
were rejected at the 10/24/00 Council Meeting. The Project will be re-bid after plan modifications are
complete. Anticipated time for re-advertisement is 12/00.
8. Pala Road Bridge Landscape
This project will install landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restore the wetlands
in the construction zone. It includes the installation of an irrigation system, planting, and hydroseeding. The
wetlands creation site located approximately 1/2 mile east of the bridge project has been planted and will
begin the five-year maintenance period. Construction on the median and parkway improvements is to begin
12/4/00. Construction should be completed by February 2001.
9. Pala Road Soundwalls
Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block Soundwalls on Pala Road from west of
Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. The wall averages 14' in height. Bids were opened on
October 5, 2000. The pre-construction meeting for constructing the Soundwalls is set for 11/27/00.
10. Sports Park Pond Desiltation
The project will include the removal of 15,000 cubic yards of silt from the existing pond located along
Rancho Vista Road. The contractor began the silt removal work on November 17. This project is scheduled
for completion in mid January 2001.
11. Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting
Under this project, new lights will be installed in all fields. Bids were opened on November 15, 2000. Lowest
bidder is MEI with a bid of $494,990. Project will be awarded at the November 28, 2000 Council meeting.
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
None
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
1. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road_ Low.flow Crossing
at Via Montezuma
This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via
Montezuma. Surveying of the project area is complete, and the in-house design is 95% complete. The
completed improvement plans were submitted to Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFC) on August
11, 2000, for 1st plan review. The plans were also submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for their
review. Comments were received from RCFC and the plans were resubmitted. Tom Dodson & Associates,
2 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2000\October
an environmental consultant, has begun the work necessary for the permitting process. Converse Consultants
has performed a geotechnical investigation and the report is pending. RCFCD is developing a cooperative
agreement with the City for the construction and maintenance of the Low-Flow. Project specifications are
being prepared. City Council authorized staff to solicit bids. 2nd plan check was submitted to RCFCD on
September 26, which was forwarded to Army Corp. A meeting between the City and the RCFCD, Army
Corp. and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) took place on November 15,
2000. The Construction window is from September through March due to nesting season.
2. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue
This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. Areas to be
rehabilitated were identified, and plans and specifications are being reviewed and completed. The Plans and
Specifications should go out to bid by the beginning of January.
3. Diaz Road Realignment
Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road.
Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. The designer is currently preparing the improvement
plans for 90% submittal. The design is scheduled for completion by January 2001.
4. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road
This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Road. The City returned 90% plan check
comments to the consultant for revision this month. Final plan check returned to City on 11/14. Design
completion is expected in December 2000. Bidding is expected in January.
5. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15
This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road.
This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an
additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. The consultant returned the 2nd plan check
to Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) and they have provided us with their comments. Consultant has
submitted the 2nd plan check to Caltrans the week of 11/6.
6. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley
Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma Linda and the other at WolffValley. The
plans and specifications are complete. The project is being coordinated with Pechanga Development
Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constraints.
7. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road)
This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan
check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. Work is proceeding on the remainder of
the design. The work includes geotechnical, utility research, environmental, and final design. Staffwill be
using an appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate appraisal report. The project is funded for
design only at this time.
3 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2000\October
8. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to
Wolf Valley)
Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construction
of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporation project). An encroachment permit was
issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street improvements. Traffic signal and
striping plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Phase Two) by the Pechanga
Development Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Driveway (600 feet southeast
of Wolf Valley Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approx, completion date is Spring 2001. The interim
project is on hold due to environmental constraints.
9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center and Adding a Right Turn Lane on
Westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez
The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the
Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas.
A new project to add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez is being combined with
this project due to its close proximity and for efficiency. The project is currently in design. Right of way
acquisition at the northeast comer of Rancho Califomia and Ynez will be required.
10. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road)
This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The
design process has begun and the work will be coordinated with the design of the library project. Work is
being coordinated with design of the library project. Plan check comments (30% Submittal) were returned to
the consultant. Staffis continuing with the design process and acquiring preliminary title reports. Potholing
of utilities will be performed in the next couple of weeks.
11. Senior Center Expansion
The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for
recreational, office, and meeting purposes. The project is currently being plan checked by Building and
Safety.
12. Temecula Library
A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road,
just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services.
The design is progressing on schedule. The architect started on the final drawings after the committee
completed its design and development meetings. Letters were sent to all the utilities requesting service
information. Utility services construction will be coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II street improvement
project.
13. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek
This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Mumeta Creek to provide additional traffic lanes.
The consultant will do an alignment study to determine which side of the existing bridge should be widened.
Design of the project began in September 2000. Design will take six months. Staff is currently reviewing a
preliminary alignment study submitted by the consultant.
4 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t~ClP\2000\October
14. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool
The design committee decided upon the layout of the 25-yard x 25-meter pool at Chaparral High School.
The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities,
restrooms and showers. Spray-type play equipment will be included in the construction bid. Thc design
concept is now complete and the consultant is released to prepare final construction plans and specifications,
which shall be submitted for staffreview in December 2000.
15. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project
This Project will install a sidewalk on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Staffis gathering the data,
reviewing concepts, and establishing a layout.
16. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Redesign
In this project, the existing culvert will need to be modified to eliminate a slope erosion problem.
Preliminary plans, specifications and cost estimate are complete. TCSD review is pending. This project will
be advertised for construction bids in December.
17. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita
In this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Margarita Road at Stonewood Drive. Design is underway.
First submittal is expected late November.
18. Street Name Sign Replacement
This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs and replacing them with plastic signs selected by
the Public Traffic Safety Commission. Information is being gathered. The preparation of Plans and
Specifications will start shortly.
19. Pavement Management System - Citywide
This project will involve rehabilitating various streets in the City. The pre-design meeting was held and a list
of streets has been finalized to describe the limits of work. In addition, the Pavement management System
Program (PMS) for the City will be updated.
20. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements
Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added
to accommodate increasing traffic. Staff is reviewing this project to determine requirements. Coordination
with Caltrans will be required since Winchester is a State route at this location. Basemap preparation and
design arc underway. An Encroachment permit from Caltrans will be obtained.
21. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road
This project will re-stripe the northbound on-ramp from westbound Winchester to I- 15 to allow for a better
flow of traffic. A striping plan is in the process of being prepared. The City will be applying for an
Encroachment Permit from Caltrans.
5 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2000\October
22. Overland Drive ExtensionfMurrieta Creek Bridge
This project will entail alignment studies and design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz
Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. Staffwent through the RFP process to select a
design consultant. Contract negotiations are under way with the most qualified consultant. Preliminary
engineering and alignment studies will follow.
23. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson
This project will add a right turn lane from eastbound Winchester to southbound Jefferson starting at
Enterprise Circle. Preliminary utility research and data gathering is underway.
24. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements
This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timing of the existing intersection. Data
gathering, concept review, preliminary layout is underway.
25. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase
This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdez. Data gathering,
concept review, preliminary layout is underway.
6 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\ClP~2000\October
0
0
0
0
0
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
~,~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
November 3, 2000
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - October, 2000
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house
personnel for the month of October, 2000:
SIGNS
A.
B.
C.
Total signs replaced
Total signs installed
Total signs repaired
47
8
16
85
t~0t2
16.5
164
II.
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
II1.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
IV.
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
82~000
VI.
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
26
885
VII.
STENCILING
A. 322 New and repainted legends
B. -0- L.F. of new and repainted red curb and stdping
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 32 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 43
service order requests for the month of October~ 2000.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 154 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events
and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of October~ 2000 was
$ 9~4~0.00 compared to $15~585.00 for the month of September ~ 2000.
Account No. 5402 $ - 0 -
Account No. 5401 $ 9,400.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 -
CC:
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Jerry Alegda, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of October, 2000
DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE
CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING
Date: 10/10/00 VALLEJO CHANNEL REPAIR RIP-RAP & SLURRY CHANNEL
#5401
TOTAL COST $4,950.00
Date: 10/05/00 JEDEDlAH SMITH AT MARGARITA REPAIR RIP-RAP & SLURRY CHANNEL
CHANNEL
#5401
TOTAL COST $4,450.00
Date:
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $9,400.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 -0-
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 -0-
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2000
DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK
RECEIVED COMPLETED
10/02/00 44780 SANDIA ROAD POTHOLES 10/02/00
10/02/00 42944 VIA ALHAMA TREE TRIMMING 10/02/00
10/04/00 27555 YNEZ ROAD ROCK HIT WINDSHIELD 10/04/00
10/04/00 41525 AVENIDA DE LA REINA STREET FAILING 10/04/00
10/06/00 29944 VALLE OLVERA STREET FAILING 10/06/00
10/06/00 41844 4TM STREET DEBRIS IN STREET 10/06/00
10/10/00 10351 MILKY WAY SIGN DOWN IN R.O.W. 10/10/00
10/10/00 40256 ATMORE COURT MAILBOX DAMAGED 10/10/00
10/11/00 30317 VIA BRISA CONCRETE REPAIR 10/16/00
10/12/00 29920 AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL CROSS GUTTER 10/16/00
10/12/00 VIA ANGELES AT CORTE PORFIRIO STOP SIGN 10/13/00
10/13/00 41810 RIO GRANDE CONCRETE REPAIR 10/16/00
10/16/00 43325 CALLE NACIDO CONCRETE CONTRACTOR 10/16/00
10/16/00 31425 PASEO GOLETA TREE TRIMMING 10/18/00
10/17/00 RANCHO VISTA - MIRA LOMA & SO. CROSS CATCH BASIN 10/19/00
10/17/00 30563 IRON BARK COURT CATCH BASIN 10/18/00
10/17/00 CORTE SONORA AND PASEO GOLETA SIDEWALK 10/18/00
10/18/00 30551 HOLLY BERRY LANE SIDEWALK 10/18/00
10/19/00 41640 AVENIDA DE LA REINA CLEAN STREET 10/19/00
10/19/00 41810 RIO GRANDE SPRINKLER REPAIR 10/19/00
10/19/00 27540 YNEZ STREET NAME SIGN 10/19/00
10/19/00 41844 4TM STREET DEBRIS IN STREET 10/19/00
10/20/00 42780 NORTH STAR COURT DEBRIS IN STREET 10/20/00
10/23/00 40457 CALLE MEDUSA TREE TRIIvhMING 10/23/00
10/24/00 42536 VEDADERO PLACE ROOT PRUNING 10/24/00
10/25/00 WOLF VALLEY ROAD AT PALA ROAD DEBRIS DUMPING 10/25/00
10/27/00 30262 VILLA ACTURAS S.N.S. DOWN 10/27/00
10/27/00 28636 FRONT STREET SEALING OF SIDEWALK 10/27/00
10/30/00 25671 CALLE CORTEZ S.N.S. DOWN 10/30/00
10/30/00 27735 TIERRA VISTA ROAD DEBRIS IN STREET 10/30/00
10/31/00 41844 4TM STREET DEBRIS IN STREET 10/31/00
10/31/00 43505 CORTE LOGRONO STANDING WATER 10/31/00
TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 32
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
STENCILS / STRIPING
MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2000
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
10/02/00 AREA #3 & #4 REPAINTED 59 LEGENDS
10/03/00 AREA #4 REPAINTED 61 LEGENDS
10/04/00 AREA #4 ~EPAINTED 46 LEGENDS
10/05/00 AREA #4 REPAINTED 32 LEGENDS
10/23/00 AREA #4 REPAINTED 46 LEGENDS
10/24/00 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD S/O RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. REPAINTED 43 LEGENDS
10/25/00 AREA #2 REPAINTED 35 LEGENDS
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 322
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. -0-
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2000
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
10/04/00 DIAZ ROAD NORTH OF WINCHESTER ABATED 1,000 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS
10/05/00 DIAZ ROAD AND JEFFERSON ABATED 2,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/11/00 YNEZ SOUTH OF SANTIAGO ABATED 21,000 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS
10/11/00 DE PORTOLA SOUTH OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ABATED 27,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/12/00 DE PORTOLA NORTH OF MARGARITA ABATED 18,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/13/00 E. VALLEJO - LA PAZ TO DE PORTOLA ABATED 8,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/13/00 WINCHETER AT RUSTIC GLEN ABATED 30 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/19/00 YNEZ AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK ABATED 100 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS
10/19/00 YNEZ AT PREECE ABATED 3,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/19/00 PAUBA WEST OF LA PRIMAVERA ABATED 1,100 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/19/00 C STREET CHANNEL ABATED 700 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS
10/20/00 YNEZ ROAD AT RANCHO FORD ABATED 70 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS
TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATED 82~000
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE
MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2000
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
10/03/00 AKEA gl CLEANED & CHECKED 4 CATCH BASINS
10/05/00 IEFFERSON NORTH OF OVERLAND CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS
10/17/00 RANCHO VISTA EAST OF YNEZ CLEANED & CHECKED I CATCH BASINS
10/18/00 AILEA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 8 CATCH BASINS
10/19/00 AREA #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 8 CATCH BASINS
10/20/00 26700 YNEZ ROAD CLEANED & CHECKED 5 CATCH BASINS
10/23/00 AREA gl CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS
10/24/00 AREA # 1 CLEANED & CHECKED 13 CATCH BASINS
10/25/00 AREA gl CLEANED & CHECKED 26 CATCH BASINS
10/26/00 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 35 CATCH BASINS
10/27/00 C1TYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 27 CATCH BASINS
10/29/00 AREA gl CLEANED & CHECKED 23 CATCH BASINS
TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 164
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2000
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
10/02/00 WINCHESTER AT COLT REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/03/00 MARGARITA PARK "REAR WALL" REMOVED 273 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/04/00 MARGARITA PARK "REAR WALL" REMOVED 52 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/04/00 FRONT STREET COUNTRY GARDEN RESTAURANT REMOVED 110 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/05/00 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/05/00 COPPER BEECH AT YUKON REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/06/00 41923 2~'~° STREET REMOVED 7 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/06/00 HWY 79 NO. BEHIND CARL'S JR. REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/10/00 MADISON AT McCABE REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/10/00 RANCHO VISTA AT VIA VISTANA REMOVED 128 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/10/00 NICOLAS AT RORIPAUGH (4 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/10/00 RORIPAUGH AT SENNA COURT REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/10/00 RANCHO HIGHLAND AT YNEZ REMOVED 6 $.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/11/00 DENNY'S PARKING LOT REMOVED I0 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/20/00 NICOLAS AT N. GENERAL KEARNEY REMOVED 24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/23/00 CALLE GIRASOL AT RIVERTON REMOVED 13 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/27/00 41850MORENO REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/31/00 42122 RIO NEDO (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 150 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/31/00 42232 RIO NEDO (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10/31/00 42188 RIO NEDO (2 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 8 $.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 885
TOTAL LOCATIONS 26
~[,-
~0
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2000
DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORKI S.F. TOTAL
TONS
10/09/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF MORAGA R & R A.C. 203 6.5
10/11/00 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD POTHOLE REPAIR 85 TEMP. A.C.
10/13/00 NORTH GENERAL KEARNY SOUTH OF NICOLAS POTHOLE REPAIR 14 TEMP A.C.
10/23/00 NICOLAS AT VIA LOBO A.C. OVERLAY 306 2.5
10/25/00 PREECE AT GATEWOOD A.C. OVERLAY 95 2
10/26/00 MARGARITA NORTH OF DE PORTOLA A.C. OVERLAY 201 2
10/31/00 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AT HEX FED R & R A.C. 108 3.5
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 1~012
TOTAL TONS 16.5
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SIGNS
MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2000
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
10/02/00 TEMEKU DRIVE INSTALLED 4 R2 - 30
10/03/00 JEFFERSON AT SANBORN ~EPLACED R-7
10/05/00 YNEZ NORTH OF TIERRA VISTA REPLACED W-41
10/11/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF COSMIC REPLACED R 26/81
10111/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. EAST OF MARGARITA REPLACED R~I 7
10/11/00 CALLE ARANDA AT CORTE CANTERA REPLACED R-I-2
10/11/00 30145 VIA NORTE REPLACED CARSONITE
10/11/00 NICOLAS ROAD NORTH OF WINCHESTER REPLACED W-66
10/11/00 VIA LOBO AT DEERMEADOW REPLACED W-31 &TYPE"N" MARKER
10/11/00 NICOLAS ROAD EAST OF JOSEPH ROAD REPLACED CARSONITE
10/13/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. E/B 100' WEST OF 1-15 REPAIR 2-42 "TC'
10/13/00 VIA ANGELES AT CORTE PORFIRIO REPAIR R-1 "TC"
10ll 3/00 WINCHESTER AT RUSTIC GLENN INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN 1
10/13/00 NICOLAS AT WINCHESTER REPLACE W-66
10Il3/00 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY ~ PII~A COLADA RELOCATE TYPE N RED 2, W-7 1
10/16/00 NO. GENERAL KEARNEY ~ PIi~A COLADA RELOCATE TYPE N RED 2, W-57 1
10/16/00 PAUBA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY REPLACE CARSONITE 3 "DAMAGED"
I 0/16/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT TOWN CENTER REPLACE DELINEATORS 7 "DAMAGED"
10/19/00 MARGARITA SOUTH OF WINCHESTER REPLACE R-I "1 .... DAMAGED"
10/19/00 N. GENERAL KEARNY ~ MARGARITA REPAIR R-7 "1" TYPE K "1"
10/19/00 PALM PLAZAAT YNEZ REPLACE R-7 "1' REPAIR R-7 "1'
10/19/00 YNEZ AT OVERLAND REPLACE R-7 "1' REPLACE TYPE K "1"
10/19/00 SOLANA AT YNEZ REPLACE W-41 "DAMAGED"
10/19/00 YNEZ AT TOYOTA DEALER REPLACE TYPE K "2" "MISSING"
10/19/00 SOLANA AT YNEZ REPAIR R-7 "1'
'D~TE LOCATI°N ~ ~WORK CQMPLETED
1019/00 YNEZ AT PROMENADE MALL NORTH REMOVE SPECIALTY SIGN "1'
10/19/00 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REPLACE R-7 "1" DAMAGED
10/19/00 YNEZ AT STORE FRONT PICKUP STREET NAME SIGN "2"
10/23/00 DEL REY ROAD AT PIiqA COLADA REPLACED R-I DAMAGED
10/24/00 N. GENERAL KEARNEY AT PII~IA COLADA INSTALL 2 TYPE "N"
10/24/00 , FRONT STREET AT HWY 79 SO. REPLACED DELINEATOR MISSING
10/25/00 VINEYARD AT MEADOWS PARKWAY REPLACED R-1 GRAFFITI
10/27/00 LA SERENA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY REPLACED 3 DELINEATORS
10/27/00 CAMINO MAREA INSTALLED W-53
10/27/00 WINDSOR ROAD AT CALLE MEDUSA REPLACED R-1 FADED
10/27/00 EVEREST AT CALLE MEDUSA REPLACED R-I FADED
10/27/00 CHALDON CIRCLE SOUTH OF CALLE MEDUSA REPLACED W-17 FACED
10/27/00 WALCOTT LANE REPLACED 4 DELINEATORS
10/30/00 FRONT STREET AT SANTIAGO REPLACED R-I-2
10/30/00 CLUBHOUSE AT PALA ROAD REPLACED R-I T.C.
10/30/00 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HUMBER REPLACED R-7 T.C.
I 0/30/00 MARGARITA SOUTH OF SANTIAGO REPLACED R-26 FADED
10/30/00 PAUBA AT VIA DEADA REPLACED W-17 FADED
10/31/00 HONORS DRIVE AT BRASSIE LANE REPLACED R-I GRAFFITI
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 47
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 8
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police
November 28, 2000
Monthly Departmental Report
The following report reflects special teams, traffic enfomement and miscellaneous activity occurring
during October of 2000. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City,
providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource
deployment.
The Police Department responded to thirty-four "priority one" calls for service during the month of
October, with an average response time of approximately 5.3 minutes. A total of 1,196 calls for
police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month.
During the month of October, the Temecula Police Department's storefront served a total of 197
customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed sixty-five prints taken, thirty-nine people
filed police reports, ten people had citations signed off and eight oversized vehicle permits were
issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and
community oriented programs during the month. Fanene worked at a booth handing out information
concerning the Police Department at the "Race for the Cure" event held at the Promenade mall.
Officer Fanene conducted four residential security visits and nine business security visits during the
month. He conducted twelve visits to businesses for crime follow up information. Officer Fanene
also conducted four "Stranger Danger" and community safety presentations during the month. One
of the presentations was to members of the Sunrise Community Church. Officer Fanene
completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled "Preventing CreditJDebit Card Fraud On-
Line."
The POP Team of Officers John Anderson and Earl Quinata continued to work on the "Crime Free
Multi Housing" project. The officers are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages
of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four complexes which are
continuing with the program. Programs conducted this month included Old Town patrols with an
emphasis on alcohol related crimes. As a result of this program, several arrests were made for
Monthly Departmental Report
Page 2
driving under the influence and public intoxication. The team continued their warrant apprehension
program, which resulted in eight suspects being arrested for outstanding warrants. The team also
worked the continuing homeless assistance program, which resulted in the arrest of four subjects.
Six homeless people refused assistance and stated that being homeless was their choice.
This was the sixth month that the Old Town Storefront was operational. This storefront has served
as an office for the POP team and has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town
area. This month the Old Town storefront served ninety-one customers, thirteen fingerprints were
taken and three reports were written.
The traffic team reported that during the month of October there were 541 citations issued for
hazardous violations, 125 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 86 parking
citations were issued. There were eight injury traffic collisions, forty-eight non-injury collisions were
reported and thirty-three drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERAClT program resulted in
the arrest of one person for DUI. The Neighborhood Enfomement Team (NET) program resulted in
forty-six citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential
neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The traffic team also spearheaded the Race for the
Cure held at the Promenade Mall. This event required the use of the Posse, Reserves and
Explorers to maintain traffic safety. The event was a huge success. Crowds for the event were
estimated at 10,000-12,000.
During the month of October, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of
seventy-eight calls for service. The predominant numbers of these calls were for shoplifting
investigations. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on fourteen misdemeanors and
three felony cases for various offenses. One citation was also issued. During the month, Officer
Mark Potter rotated back to patrol duties, he was replaced by Officer Kevin Rupe. Preparations
were also made during this month for the up-coming holiday shopping season. Plans include extra
patrol and various programs to include other units from the Police Department. These programs
will continue through the holiday season to deter theft of merchandise and enhance public safety.
The officers also continued training in loss prevention to mall personnel.
The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. During the past month, the
officers conducted numerous presentations in areas such as narcotic identification, stranger
danger, bicycle safety, etc. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. Eight arrests
were made at Chaparral High school, and two arrests were made at Temecula Valley High School.
Activity at the elementary schools resulted in one arrest.
The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in
part through its youth court program. During this month the fifty-third youth court sessions was held
with complete compliance of the affected juveniles and their parents. The JOLT officer assisted at
other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program.
During the month of October, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and Mark
Krikava handled a total of eighteen cases. These cases resulted in twenty-six misdemeanor and
seventeen felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. This team continues to work street level
narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. During this month the team
arrested six suspects for possession of methamphetamine for sale and they seized $2000.00
related to narcotic sales.
Monthly Departmental Report
Page 3
Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's
staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's
volunteer staff contributed 662 hours of service in August. Volunteer assignments include
computer data input, logistics support, crime observation (TAG program surveillance), special event
assistance and telephone answering duties.
The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources
available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with
patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special
functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 262 hours during the month (104 hours were
specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). The predominant numbers of these hours were worked at
the Race for the Cure event. The posse contributed 250 hours during the month.