HomeMy WebLinkAbout062299 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JUNE 22, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
!5:30 P.M.
'Sections:
- Closed SesSik)'n 0f"'tht" City cbuncjl:
conference with Ci~ A~orney and legal. counsel:.~p~f~t:~[d~:;Go~emment'.COde:
Section 54956;8(b).and (c) with respect to ~o makers of potential'~liti~tion, With
respect to these makers, the CiW
reached where there is a significant
on existing facts and circumstances and the C'iW";~i~i~ deci~,~:'~r~;~b:: injtiat'~.:;
litigation, .' · '. ': ...::.:'::'. "' .'...:E: ':" ':""
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
Jordan Bellino
Pastor George Simmons of House of Praise
Councilman Lindemans
Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Amateur Radio Week Proclamation
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 99-12
Resolution: No. 99-48
R:~Agenda\062299
1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (1 O) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1999;
2.2 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1999.
Resolution Approving List of Demands
.RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R AAgenda\062299
2
A RESOLUTION OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
4.2
Review the program being implemented by the Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority (SAWPA);
Consider adopting the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOND
INITIATIVE
Amendment to Contract with David Turch and Associates
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve an amendment to the contract with David Turch and Associates which
extends the contract period to June 30, 2000, for the annual contract amount of
$28,000.
City Council Chamber- Facility Use Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the Facility Use Policy for the use of the City Council Chambers.
Resolution Adoptinn FY 1999/2000 Solid Waste Rates
RECOMMENDATION:
7,1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000
R:~Agenda\062299
3
8 Cable Television Franchise Transfer
9
10
11
12
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND
TRANSFER OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT BY TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,
TO CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA, L.P.
Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for FY 1999-
2000
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel
Landscape, Inc. to reassign the original agreement between the City of Temecula
and Excel Landscape, Inc. to the Temecula Community Services District.
Contract Extension for the Professional Services A.~reement to prepare the Southside
Specific Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 1 with RBF extending the performance period to
June 30, 2000.
Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Brid.qe Wideninn and Northbound Ramp
Improvements - Project No. PW95-12 - Reduction in Retention withheld from Contractor
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Approve a reduction in the retention amount held from Riverside Construction
Company from ten percent (10%) to five percent (5%) for the Rancho California
Road at Interstate 15 - Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements -
Project No. PW95-12.
Parcel Map No. 28962 (located north of Santia.ao Road, south of Estero Road, and east of
Ormsbv Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28962 in conformance with the approved Conditions of
Approval.
R:~,genda\062299
4
13
Tract MaD No. 23143-2 (located south of Pauba Road, east of Butterfield StaGe Road. and
north of De Portola Road
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-2 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
13.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
13.3
Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for
the agraements.
14
Tract MaD No. 23143-3 (located south of Pauba Road. east of Butterfield StaGe Road. and
north of De Podola Road
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-3 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
14.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
14.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for
the agreements.
15
Tract MaD No. 23143-4 (located south of Pauba Road. east of Butterfield Stage Road. and
north of De Portola Road
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-4 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
15.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
15.3
Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Matedal Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for
the agreements.
16
Summarily Vacate Portions of Public Streets in Parcel MaD No. 20278 (located at the
northeast comer of Solana Way at Maraarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING PORTIONS OF SOLANA
WAY AND MARGARITA ROAD IN PARCEL MAP NO. 20278
R:V~4}enda~:)6228e
5
17 All-Way Stop - Margarita Road at DePortola Road
18
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP
INTERSECTION AT MARGARITA ROAD AND DEPORTOLA
ROAD
Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Installation - Rancho California Road at
Via Las Colinas - Project No. PW97-29
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Accept the project - Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho California Road & Via Las
Colinas - Project No. PW97-29 - as complete;
18.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year
(1) Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
18.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
Completion, if no liens have been filed.
19 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 99-11
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX TO
FINANCE THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICING
OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES,
RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS,
MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND
TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITHIN THE TERRITORY ANNEXED TO
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS PART OF THE
REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1
(REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH)
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~Agenda\062299
6
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
*************** **,,,,, **, ********, ****** *****, ** *************,,,, ******************~**,, a, .~,~]~,,.' ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~, *****e
' ~ . '. ' ' "~j. ~ ~'.... ;*.' .~ ;?~,,,~:~:~'~'F :* ~,,~ ?;*.. ~:".~' ,. "'
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 99-01
Resolution: No. CSD 99-07
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of June 8, 1999.
2 Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for FY 1999-00
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with
Excel Landscape, Inc. to accept the reassignment of the original agreement
between the City and Excel Landscape, Inc. to the Temecula Community
Services District in the amount of $738,468 and an additional amount not to exceed
$65,820 for sites to be brought on line during the term on the contract for Fiscal Year
1999-00;
R:~,genda\062299
3
4
5
2.2 Extend the term of the agreement for two (2) years and allow for the addition of
supplement landscape maintenance contract areas for the term of the agreement;
2.3 Approve contingency of 10% in the amount of $73,850 for extra work items.
Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement Areas into
Service Level C for Fiscal Year 1999-2000
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING
CERTAIN TRACTS INTO-TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR
PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS
BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000
3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING
CERTAIN SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN TRACT
NO. 28309 INTO SERVICE LEVEL C (RATE LEVEL 1) FOR
MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-
2000
3.3 Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement
documents.
Award Restroom Maintenance Services Contract for FY 1999-2000
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Award a two-year (2) contract to Self's Janitorial Service to provide park and
facility restroom maintenance services in the amount not to $41,400 to for Fiscal
Year 1999-00.
Ratification of Election Results- Tract No. 23143
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:~Agenda\062299
8
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING
THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT MAIL-IN BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON
JUNE 2, 1999, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER
MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
6 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B -
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C -
SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE LEVEL D -
RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - STREET
AND ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR
1999-2000
R:~Agenda~62299
9
DISTRICT BUSINESS
7 Temecula Valley Museum - Interior Exhibit Design
RECOMMENDATION:
7, 1 Approve in its substantial form the interior exhibit design concepts for the
Temecula Valley Museum,
8 Review and Approval of the FY 1999-2000 Annual Operatin.cl Budget
RECOMMENDATION:
81 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, June 29, 1999, at 6:00 P.M., CIP Workshop, City Council Chambers,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:V~,genda\062299
10
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGEN,C,:Y.ME. ETIN,.G: ' ';. ""':'.'. ~.~ ~::,:::.~:,:' ......:'~'~:':!:.~!:"~"' ~':"' ",' ':
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 99-01
Resolution: No. RDA 99-10
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemans presiding
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of June 8, 1999.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2
Review and Approval of the FY 1999-2000 Temecula Redevelopment A~ency
Annual Operating Budget
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RAAgenda\062299
11
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, June 29, 1999, at 6:00 P.M., CIP Workshop, City Council Chambers,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~genda\062299
12
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval
of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at,
or prior to, the public hearing.
20
Modification of the Parking Standards for part of the Old Town Specific Plan (Planning
Application No. PA99-0160)
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD
TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-
0160)
21 An Umency Ordinance Amendin.q the California Fire Code
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment;
21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS
UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE
CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.16
OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE
CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998
EDITION, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO
PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE
R:~Agenda\062299
13
21.3 Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled:
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING
BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1,
CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM
FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION
21.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR
TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE
CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION
22 An Ur.aency Ordinance Amendin.cl the Uniform Building Codes
RECOMMENDATION;
22.1 Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment;
22.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS
UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE
CITY COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.04
OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE 1998
EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998
EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, THE 1998
EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, AND
THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODES,
ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE
PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE
R:~,genda\062299
14
22.3 Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled:
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
15.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY
REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF
THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, THE 1997 EDITION OF
THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1997 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING
CODE, AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA
ELECTRICAL CODE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY
THEREOF
22.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY
REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF
THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, THE 1997 EDITION OF
THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1997 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS, THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING
CODE, AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA
ELECTRICAL CODE
COUNCIL BUSINESS
23
Pro~osed Traffic Sianal at the intersection of Mamarita Road and Pio Pico Road
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Approve installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio
Pico Road.
R:%Agenda%062299
15
24
Award ~f q,,onstruction Contract for Traffic Sianal Installation at the Intersections of
Maroadta Road at Pio Pico Road - Proiect No. PVV98-12 - and Mamadta Road at Pauba
Road - Proiect No. PVV98-13
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Award a consffijction contract for the installation of traffic signals at the intersections
of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No. PVV98-12 - and Margarita Road at
Pmaba Road - Project No. PW98-13 - to DBX, Inc. of Ternecula, California, in the
amount of $219,467.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
24.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $21,946.70, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount;
24.3 Accelerate appropriation of budgeted funds in F"Y 1999-2000 to FY 1998-1999 in the
mount of $85,900.00 to construction Account No. 210-165-700-5804.
25 Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Adopt a resolution antitied:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL
TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 TO FINANCE
RECREATIONAL AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND
THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICING OF
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN
LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
26 Aooroval of Election Resolutions
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 2, 1999
R:%Agends1062299
16
26.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99...
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING
OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES
26.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF
AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION
DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL
RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR
SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO
THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE
ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL
ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY
TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE
27
Review and Adoption of the FY 1999-2000 Annual ODemtin.a Budget
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON
CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
R:%Agenda~062299
17
27.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF
POSITIONS
THE CITY OF
AUTHORIZED
27.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FY 1999-00
28 Adoption of an Umencv Ordinance prohibiting the permitting. approval. development. and
placement of additional Wireless Communications Facilities
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1 Adopt sn Urgency Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY AND REGULAR INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING A PROHIBITION ON THE PERMITTING,
APPROVAL, DEVELOPMENT, AND PLACEMENT OF ALL
FORMS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Tuesday, June 29, 1999, CIP Workshop, at 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers,
43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California.
R:V~gends~06229~)
18
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM
1
ITEM
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
MAY 11, 1999
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the
City and/or the Agency. The following cases will be discussed: City of Temecula
vs. Pala Rainbow LLC.
2. Discussion of candidates for position of City Manager pursuant to Government
Code Section 54957.
The Open Session of the City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, and Ford.
Absent: Councilmember: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Sandi Sharp, Ashley Musick, Melissa Cayalyab, and Jilljan
Cook.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Stanley Lubeck of Church on the Rock.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Lindemans.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
First Annual Recycling Recognition Awards Pro.clram
Introducing the First Annual Recycling Award Program, Mayor Ford advised that this program has
successfully assisted the City in meeting its State requirements regarding the reduction of disposable
materials deposited at the landfill, In light of this accomplishment, Mayor Ford announced that the
City would like to recognize and reward the following households in their extreme recycling efforts:
The Meyer Family
The Oveson Family
The Trebon Family
R:\Minutes\051199
The Kicak Family
The Pepe Family
The Cook Family
Mr. Ed Campos of CR&R commended the families on their recycling efforts and presented each with
various rewards.
Certificates of Achievement for Cub Scouts highest rank of Arrow of Light
Commending the Arrow of Light recipients, Certificates of Achievement were presented to the
following individuals:
John Haynes
Brian Jordan
Noah Ng
Thomas Polhill
Michael Thomas
Matthew Carreon
Travis Blair
Javier Medellin
Jeremy Dempster
Michael Tessen
Daniel Tonkins
Ryan Tynning
Vance Woodward
Proclamation for Fibromyal.qia Awareness Day
Mayor Ford so proclaimed May 12, 1999, as Fibromyalgia Awareness Day and presented a
proclamation to Ms. Sandy Waller who expressed appreciation to the City Council and further
elaborated on this disease and its daily impacts on those who have it.
Certificate of Appreciation to Guidant Corporation
Thanking the Guidant Corporation for their cooperation with the construction of the Overland
Overcrossing Project, a Certificate was presented and accepted by Ms. Susan Norton.
Certificate of Appreciation to Southern California Edison
Thanking Southern California Edison for their cooperation with the construction of the Overland
Overcrossing Project, a Certificate was presented and accepted by Mr, Nick Savala and Mr. Bob
Lopez.
Special Achievement Award
Mayor Ford presented the five-year pin to Mr. Charles Coe, Chairman of the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission.
Ms. Amy Ellevold, Christian Youth Theatre, provided a short performance from Alison in Concert;
thanked the City Council for its continued support; and invited the Council and the public to attend the
upcoming event.
R:\Minutes\051199
PUBLIC COMMENTS
With regard to the General Plan as it relates of North General Kearney Road and Sanderling Way,
Mr. Bob Lopshire, 40244 Atmore Court, encouraged the City to open North General Kearney Road
and Sanderling Way Road in order to relieve traffic congestion.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Reiterating previously made comments, Councilman Comerchero confirmed that the City
will be the recipient of a San Diego Padre Park project.
B. Commenting on the simplicity with which Sister City Voorburg operates, Councilman
Comerchero encouraged the City to consider such simplicity for specific operations such a
transportation and shared his unforgettable experience while visiting Voorburg and extended
appreciation to the host families.
C. Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that the Nicolas Road Sidewalk Project be agendized
and that the possibility of a reimbursement agreement be discussed with the landowners.
D. Considering the impacts the ongoing infrastructure improvements are having on the City's
overall traffic flow, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that no traffic flow modifications be made
during peak hours.
E. With regard to traffic congestion, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that staff address the
left-turn signal at southbound Front Street onto Rancho California Road (traveling east).
F. Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that those Commissioners designated to attend the City
Council meeting be provided a copy of the Agenda packet.
G. Commenting on the results of a joint San Diego Association of Governments in Southern
California and Association of Governments meeting, Councilman Roberts advised that both
entities will work together in an effort to discuss a regional transportation plan, airport system
planning, and high-speed rail.
H. Having received recent TCI pricing information, Councilman Roberts relayed his
opposition to the increase in rates in light of the service provided and requested that staff consider
the renegotiation of the contract.
I. Echoing Councilman Comerchero's comments, Councilman Lindemans as well
commented on the simplicity with which Sister City Voorburg addressed transportation issues.
R:\Minutes\051199
3
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of March 23, 1999.
3 Resolution ADDroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1999.
5 Award of Contract for two Compaq Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartrid.cle Tape Library
Backup System
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Award a contract for two Compaq Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartridge Tape
Library Backup System to Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc., Riverside, California, in
the amount of $91,993.42;
5.2 Appropriate $91,994 in General Fund Reserves.
Pulled and considered under separate discussion; see page 8.
R:\Minutes\051199
6
Professional Services Plannin.Q Agreement - BidAmerica and City of Temecula - Archiving
Planning Files to Computer Discs
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
6.2
Approve a Professional Services Agreement between BidAmerica and the City to
provide Compact Discs (CDs) of the Planning Files and Maps by scanning the
documents and creating a database table compatible with our 8ierra System to
retrieve and reproduce these plans and documents through the City computer
network and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement;
Approve an appropriation of $35,013.03 from the General Fund Reserves to the
Planning Department Consulting Services Account Number 001-161-999-5248 for
creating a database table, labeling, and scanning approximately 1,820 plans, 160,615
documents, and 1,456 multi-page project files.
7
Authorize Temporary Street Closure for Cowboy Poetry and Western Music Show Event at
the Musicians Workshop in Old Town (Mercedes Street from Second Street to Third Street)
RECOMMENDATION:
7,1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURE
FOR COWBOY POETRY AND WESTERN MUSIC SHOW ON
MAY 28, 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO
ISSUE PERMITS FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT
Considering the distance this property is from Mr. Stone's property, City Attorney
Thorson confirmed that Mayor Pro Tem Stone may vote with regard to this Item.
Release Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Securities for Sewer Improvements
in Parcel Map No. 23426 (located at the easterly side of Ynez Road southerly of Solana
Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Securities for
sewer improvements in Parcel Map No. 23426.
8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and the surety.
Accept Public Improvements in Parcel Map No. 28697 (located at the northeast corner of
Winchester Road - State Route 79 North - and Margarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the public street including median, sewer, and water improvements in Parcel
Map No. 28697;
R:~Minutes\051199
10
11
12
13
9.2
Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful
Performance Street, Water, and Sewer security amount to ten percent (10%) warranty
level;
9.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and surety.
Release Labor and Materials and Subdivision Monumentation Securities for Public
Improvements in Tract No. 21818 (located westerly of the intersection of Via Norte at
Kahwea Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Authorize release of the Labor and Materials security for the Public Improvements in
and the Subdivision Monumentation security for Tract No. 21818;
10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities for Public
Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6 (located southwesterly of the intersection of Meadows
Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials bonds for
Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6;
11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and sureties.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials Securities for Public
Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F ('located southwesterly of the intersection of Meadows
Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
securities;
12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the FY98-
99 Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-07
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-07 - FY98-99
Pavement Management System.
Pulled and considered under separate discussion; see page 9.
R:\Minutes\051199
6
14
15
16
Solicitation of Construction Bids for Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersections of
Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No, PW98-12 - and Margarita Road at Pauba
Road - Project No, PW98-13
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Approve the Project Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public
Works to solicit bids for the construction of traffic signal installations at the
intersections of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No. PW98-12 - and
Margarita Road at Pauba Road - Project No. PW98-13.
Summarily Vacate portions of interior streets in Tract No. 23583 ('located northeasterly of
the intersection of North General Kearny Road at Calle Madero)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF CORTE
COELHO AND ALL OF CORTE GURULE IN TRACT NO. 23583
SAID RESOLUTION IS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY
PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9, OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE
Accept Offers of Dedication for Revised portions of interior streets in Tract No. 23583
(located northeasterly of the intersection of North General Kearnv Road at Calle Madero)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR
REVISED PORTIONS OF INTERIRO STREETS IN TRACT NO.
23583 (NORTHEAST OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD AT
CALLE MADERO) BUT NOT INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM AT THIS TIME
R:\Minutes\051199
17 Amendment No. 3 to Professional Engineering Services Agreement with T Y Lin
International for the Pala Road Brid.qe Improvement Project - Project No. PW97-15
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve Amendment No. 3 to Professional Engineering Services Agreement between
the City of Temecula and T Y Lin International to provide additional Engineering
Services for the Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project - Project No. PW97-15 - in
an amount not to exceed $16,270.00 and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment I%1o.
3.
Pulled and considered under separate discussion; see page 9.
18 Rancho California Road/I-15 and Winchester Road/I-15 Additional Improvements - Project
No. PW98-07A and PW98-08A
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit construction bids for additional ramp
improvements at Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW98-
07A- and Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW98-08A.
19 Authorization to advertise for Proposals to Study the Street and Traffic Circulation System of
the Meadowview Area
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to advertise for proposals to study the street
and traffic circulation system of the Meadowview Area.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION
5 Award of Contract for two Compacl Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartrid.cle Tape Library
Backup System
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Award a contract for two Compaq Proliant Servers and a DLT 15 Cartridge Tape
Library Backup System to Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc., Riverside, California, in
the amount of $91,933.42;
5.2 Appropriate $91,994 in General Fund Reserves.
For Councilman Comerchero, City Clerk Jones clarified the depreciation schedule for computer
equipment and advised that the City's current equipment is Y2K compliant but that the City is
rapidly approaching capacity with its current servers.
Assistant City Manager O'Grady noted that although the City depreciates its equipment on a
three-year cycle, replacement would not be recommended prior to the need.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
R:~vlinutes\051199
8
13
Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the
FY98-99 Pavement Management System - Project No. PW99-07
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department
of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW99-07 - FY98-99
Pavement Management System.
With regard to this issue, Councilman Lindemans apprised staff that, in Voorburg, all bicycle
paths, for visibility and safety reasons, are painted red. Mr. Lindemans encouraged staff to
pursue such action.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
17
Amendment No. 3 to Professional Eng neering Services AGreement with T Y Lin
International for the Pala Road Bridge Improvement Project- Project No. PW97-15
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Approve Amendment No. 3 to Professional Engineering Services Agreement
between the City of Temecula and T Y Lin International to provide additional
Engineering Services for the Pala Bridge Improvement Project - Project No.
PW97-15 - in an amount not to exceed $16,270.00 and authorize the Mayor to
sign Amendment No. 3.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Acting Public Works Director Hughes clarified the proposed
request and advised that this expenditure was one which was unforeseeable.
In the future, Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that any similar requests for which the 10%
contingency amount has been exceeded that the staff report clearly reflect the reasoning for each
amendment.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Mayor Pro Tem Stone who voted n._9.
At 8:02 P.M., the Council briefly recessed the meeting and convened as the Temecula
Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 8:24 P.M., the City
Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
18
Rancho California Road/I-15 and Winchester Road/I-15 Additional Improvements - Project
No. PW98-07A and PW98-08A
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit construction bids for additional
ramp improvements at Rancho California Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No,
PW98-07A - and Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15 - Project No. PW98-
08A.
R:%Minutes\051199
9
By way of overheads, Acting Public Works Director Hughes clarified the proposed improvements
and the impacts it will have on existing landscaping as well as the irrigation system.
Even if it meant to prolong the project, Mayor Pro Tem Stone relayed his desire to have all work
completed at night in an effort to minimize the inconvenience to residents.
In light of the penalties which will be imposed on the contractor if the work were not completed on
time, Acting Public Works Director Hughes noted that a portion of the work will have to be
completed at night.
Further clarifying the proposed project, Mr. Hughes, for Councilman Comerchero, commented on
the positive impact this project will have on turning movements for Ynez Road and Winchester
Road.
Both Councilmen Comerchero and Lindemans concurred with Mayor Pro Tem Stone's suggestion
to complete all work at night. Mr. Hughes further clarified that a combination of night and day
work would complete the project by October 1, 1999, and that restricting the project to night work
only would delay the project by approximately 15 to 25 days and that it would as well increase the
bid cost by approximately 30%.
At a minimum, Councilman Roberts requested that there be no lane closures during peak traffic
hours. It was the consensus of the City Council to not close any lanes prior to 10:00 A.M.
For Councilman Lindemans, Acting 'Public Works Director Hughes elaborated on bike/pedestrian
lanes, clarifying that bike lanes require a 5' space and must be provided in both directions,
therefore, requiring additional space of 10'. Mr. Hughes advised that no such lanes have been
provided for Rancho California Road or Winchester Road. He clarified that bicycles are not
prohibited from utilizing the roadway but that there will not be a designated bike lane. As to
pedestrian access, Mr. Hughes noted that both Winchester Road and Rancho California Road
have pedestrian crossing on one side. As to the Overland Project, Mr. Hughes noted that no bike
lanes will be provided but that pedestrian access will be provided on the north side but not on the
south side.
Mayor Ford relayed his concurrence with Mr. Hughes' recommendation to have the contractor
complete this project during day and night hours but that there be no lane closures during peak
hours.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the
addition that there be no lane closures prior to 10:00 A.M.
19
Authorization to advertise for Proposals to Study the Street and Traffic Circulation System of
the Meadowview Area
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council authorize the
Public Works Department to advertise for proposals to study the street and traffic
circulation system of the Meadowview Area,
Councilman Roberts noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this issue.
Acting Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (of record).
R:\Minutes\051199
10
Addressing the importance of neighborhood workshops/meetings in order to adequately address
the noted concerns/issues, Assistant City Manager O'Grady commented on the staff time
associated with such meetings and suggested that this matter be considered in conjunction with
the CIP process and that the matter be as well considered in conjunction with the City-wide
Circulation Element.
Being of the opinion that a more comprehensive study would be necessary to adequately reflect
the positive and negative impacts to surrounding communities, Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated that
such a study should include Roripaugh and Calle Medusa and noted that such a study would
require a greater expenditure.
Mr. Rolfe Wittman, 30617 Calle Pina Colada, resident of Meadowview, relayed his desire to
obtain relief from the cut-through traffic; commented on the negative impacts the Mall traffic will
have on Meadowview; and further elaborated on the existing substandard roads in Meadowview.
Concurring with Mr. Wittman, Mr. Andrew Ronie, 40575 La Colina. further elaborated on the
problem of cut-through through in Meadowview. Although concurring with the need of a more
comprehensive study, Mr. Ronie stated that at this point in time, such a study would not be
justifiable and suggested that the matter be considered with the City-wide Circulation Element and
that it should include nearby County developments.
Viewing this situation with Meadowview as an on-going problem, Councilman Comerchero noted
that it will not be resolved until the City clearly identifies Meadowview as a rural community or as
an integral part of the City.
Councilman Lindemans, echoed by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, noted that the Meadowview residents
would prefer to be labeled as a rural community and that the City should respect those residents'
wishes.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved that this matter be consider in conjunction with the CIP
process and that the item be appropriately prioritized. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Lindemans and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who
abstained.
20 Chardonnav Hills Final Pavement Status
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Oral Report.
Providing an overview, Acting Public Works Director Hughes advised that negotiations and
discussions are ensuing with Lennar and that the City Council will be kept apprised.
Mr. David Mathewson, 31293 Durney Court, extended appreciation to the City and staff for the
expediency with which this matter was addressed.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to receive and file the report. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
R:~vlinutes\051199
11
21 Consideration of ADpointment of Water Subcommittee Members
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Appoint an ad-hoc subcommittee of two City Council members to meet with the
Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts as appropriate to discuss
various water issues.
Assistant City Manager O'Grady presented the staff report (of record) after which the following
motion was offered:
MOTION: Mayor Ford moved to appoint Councilmembers Comerchero and Roberts. The motion
was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
22 Creation of a No Parking Zone on Avenida De La Reina
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING NO PARKING ZONE ON AVENIDA
DE LA REINA BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7:00 A.M. TO 9:00
A.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT A
· Acting Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (of record).
Although supporting the no parking restriction, Mayor Pro Tern Stone commented on the rights of
those individuals, residing on this street, that may be impacted and suggested the implementation
of a parking permit to which Mr, Hughes advised that the Commission had addressed parking
permit process,
Considering the distance of the proposed no parking zone, Mr. Hughes, for Councilman
Comerchero, advised that the Commission had expressed no concern with the possibility of the
traffic concern migrating further north and, thereby, creating a similar problem on Arroya Vista and
Corte Alhambra.
Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner Connerton further elaborated the Commission's rationale with
Acting Public Works Director Hughes noting that if a problem were to arise further north, the
matter would be addressed by the Commission.
If a problem were to arise for the residents, Mayor Pro Tem Stone reiterated that he would
recommend the use of a parking permit.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
R:\Minutes\051199
12
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
In light of Acting City Manager Nelson's absence, Assistant City Manager O'Grady wished Mr.
Nelson a speedy recovery; commented on the continual progress with the Overland Overcrossing
Project; and commended the Guidant Corporation, Southern California Edison, and the Public
Works staff on a job well done.
Mr. O'Grady as well commended the Community Services Department on a job well done as it
relates to the progress of the Duck Pond Project.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no reportable actions under the Brown Act; that
direction was provided to staff with respect to the one item of litigation; advised that the settlement
agreement will be readdressed by the City Council for review in Open Session; and noted that no
action was taken on the personnel matter.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:33 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, May 25, 1999,
7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula California.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\051199
13
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
MAY 25, 1999
CLOSED SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M. It was duly
moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a) with respect to two matters of existing litigation involving the
City and/or the Agency. The following cases/claims will be discussed: (a) Blind
Pig Brewery and (b) Claims of Westside City I & II, LLP (Bill Dendy).
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b) and (c) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With
respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been
reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based
on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate
litigation.
Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 43455 Business Park
Drive, Temecula. The negotiating parties are City of Temecula and Optical Disc
Media. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property
interests proposed to be acquired. The City negotiators are Shawn Nelson and
James O'Grady,
The Open Session of the City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers: Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, and Ford.
Absent:
Councilmember: Roberts.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Jared Reed·
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Reverend Pat Campbell·
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Stone.
R:\Minutes\052599
1
In light of their upcoming trip to Japan and in appreciation for the City Council's support of this trip,
the Temecula Valley High School Choir sang the National Anthem as well as the National Anthem
for Japan.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificates of Achievement for obtaining Eagle Scout
Mayor Ford recognized the following individuals for attaining the Eagle Scout rank and Mayor
Pro Tem Stone presented each with a Certificate of Achievement:
Kevin McClintock
David Carreon
Jeff Santos
Mike Jenkins
Tim Jenkins
Matt Tonkins
Certificates of Appreciation to Temecula Valley Hi.clh School Choir
Thanking Choir Director Aamodt and each Choir Member for their performance and wishing each a
memorable trip to Japan, Certificates of Appreciation were presented to the following Choir Member:
Briana Schultz
Sebastian Rodriguez
Tanner Palmer
Saweah Mayson
Reese Madison
Numair Khaled
Erica Hilberg
Janet Gorman
Cheri Gorin
Sara Forgy
Valerie Flynt
Brooke Faldmo
Faith Duitsman
Laura Divan
Julie Diehi
Lindsey Davis
Sarah Carlson
Jason Buack
Michelle Beaupain
Aracely Ambriz
Selena Tourtillotte
On behalf of the Choir, Director Aamodt thanked and expressed appreciation to the Council for its
support.
R:\Minutes~052599
National Mental Health Month Proclamation
Mayor Ford so proclaimed the month of May as National Mental Health Month and a proclamation
was accepted by Mr. Peter Moyes.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Presenting an array of rose bouquets to the City Councilmembers, Ms. Rebecca Weersing, 41775
Yorba Avenue, President of the Temecula Valley Rose Society, expressed appreciation to the City
Council, staff, and the citizens for the collective support of the Society's activities; advised that a
Youth Garden is being created within the existing Rose Garden (Rose Haven); and invited the
Councilmembers and the public to the Annual Rose Show on Saturday, May 29,1999, at the
Community Recreation Center.
Presenting an official Festival poster, Ms. Martha Minkler, representing the Arts Council of the
Temecula Valley, thanked the Council for its continued support; referenced the various upcoming
activities; introduced Ms. Sherry Smith the designer of this year's and last year's poster; and
invited the Councilmembers and public to attend Arts in the Country (June 4 - 13, 1999).
In honor of the Veterans, Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, invited the Councilmembers and the
public to the Memorial Day Services on Monday, May 31, 1999, at the Temecula Cemetery.
By way of an overhead, Mr. Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico, and Ms. Jamie Jeffers, 31646 Pio
Pico, addressed their concern of retaining a four-way stop at Pio Pico versus the installation of a
traffic signal until Meadows Parkway has been connected and the Paseo del Sol traffic has been
diverted to SR 79.
Although the proposed traffic signal has gone to bid, Acting Public Works Director Hughes
advised that the project has not been awarded to which Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested that the
matter be reagendized in order for the City Council to reendorse the validity of the traffic signal. It
was the consensus of the City Council to concur with Mayor Pro Tem Stone's recommendation.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. In Councilman Roberts' absence, Councilman Comerchero advised that he had attended
the Budget Implementation Committee Meeting for RCTC, noting that the $111 million budget was
approved at that meeting. Mr. Comerchero commented on the gross inequity of RCTC's
appropriations of Measure A funds, advising that he will further address the issues with
Councilman Roberts,
B. In response to the Council's discussion several months ago, Councilman Comerchero
advised that a Wall of Honor will be constructed and located in the rotunda of the new museum
and that Committee discussions will ensue.
C. Considering this December will be the 10th Anniversary of the City of Temecula, Mayor Pro
Tem Stone requested that the Community Services Commission consider and review the planning
of a celebration.
D. Mayor Ford encouraged the Councilmembers and the public to attend the upcoming
Memorial Day Services at the Temecula Cemetery.
R:\Minutes\052599
E. For the public, Mayor Ford advised that Councilman Roberts will not be in attendance of
this evening's meeting in order to attend other City-related business.
F. Mayor Ford advised that Agenda Item No. 17 (Cox Communications) will be continued to the
June 8, 1999, City Council meeting.
SUBSEQUENT NEED ITEM
City Attorney Thorson advised that a request has come before the City Council to consider
housing issues at the Temecula Villas; noted that it would be appropriate for the City Council to
make a motion to declare a subsequent need in light of time limits with respect to determining
whether or not to provide assistance to the potentially displaced residents; and requested that
direction be given to staff after which the Item would be agendized for a future City Council
meeting for an official determination.
Because Mayor Pro Tern Stone's property is a considerable distance from the property of
discussion and because the Council is not considering the purchase or sale of the property, City
Attorney Thorson advised that Mayor Pro Tem Stone may participate in the discussion and vote
relative to this Item.
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to consider the Temecula Villas as a subsequent need
item. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 13, 1999;
2.2 Approve the minutes of April 20, 1999.
3 Resolution ADDroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
R:\Minutes\052599
4
4
5
Award of Construction Contract for Maintenance Facility - Second Floor Remodel Project -
Phase II
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
4.2
Award a construction contract for the Second Floor Remodel Project - Phase II - to
Rasmussen Brothers Construction in the amount of $70,700.00 and authorize the
Mayor to execute the Agreement;
Authorize the Acting City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract amount.
Street Name Chan~le from Ynez Road to Ynez Court
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME IN PARCEL MAP
22714 YNEZ ROAD TO YNEZ COURT
This Item was pulled and considered for separate discussion; see page 8.
Agreement for Design Services - Maintenance Facility Improvements - Phase III
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve an Agreement between Davidson + Allen Architects and the City of
Temecula for architectural and structural design services for Maintenance Facility
Improvements - Phase III- in the amount of $31,875.00;
6.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of Temecula.
Purchase of two (2) Public Works' Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the purchase of two (2) Dodge model year 2000, full-sized vehicles from
Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge in the amount of $58,831.50.
Purchase of one (1) Fire Department Rescue Sauad Vehicle
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve the purchase of one (1) 1999 Fire Rescue Squad vehicle from Raceway Ford
in the amount of $49,125.00;
R:\Minutes\052599
5
8.2 Approve a transfer from Development Impact Fee Fire Mitigation in the amount of
$49,125.00,
9
10
11
12
Release Labor and Materials Securities for Public Improvements in Tract No. 24131-2
(located southwesterly of Meadows Parkway at McCabe Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize release of the Labor and Materials Securities for the public improvements in
Tract No. 24131-2;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developer and the surety.
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 28309 (located on the south side of Nicolas Road
easterly of North General Kearnv Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Accept the public improvements including subdivision monumentation in Tract No.
28309;
10.2
Authorize reduction in the Faithful Performance security amount to the 10% warranty
level, initiation of the one-year warranty period, and release of the subdivision
monumentation security;
10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System within Tract No. 28309
('located on the south side of Nicolas Road easterIv of North General Kearn¥ Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO
THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO.
28309)
Tract Map No. 23101-5 (located south of La Serena Way, east of Meadows Parkway, west
of Butterfield Stage Road, and north of Rancho California Road in the Margarita Villa.ee
Specific Plan No. 199
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23101-5 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
12.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
R:\Minutes\052599
12.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance
Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
13 Tract Map No. 23100-6 ('located south of La Serena Way, east of Meadows Parkway, west
of Butterfield Stage Road, and north of Rancho California Road in Margarita Villa.ae Specific
Plan No. 199
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23100-6 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
13.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
13.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance
Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
14 Parcel Map No. 29060 (located north of Rancho California Road and west of Humber Drive)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29060 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
14.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
14.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance
Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
15 Professional Geotechnical Services Agreement - Pala Road Bridge Improvement Proiect -
Project No. PW97-15
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve a Professional Geotechnical Services Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. for
materials testing and inspection for Pala Road Bridge - Project No. PW97-15 - in the
amount of $78,758.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
15.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $7,875.80, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount.
16 Authorization to Solicit Public Construction Bids for Old Town First Street Bridge over
Murrieta Creek - Proiect No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit construction bids for the Old Town
First Street Bridge and related roadway improvements - Project No. PW95-08.
Mayor Pro Tern Stone abstained with regard to this Item.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone extended appreciation to staff for expediting the purchase of one Fire
Department Rescue Squad Vehicle.
R:\Minutes\052599
7
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-4 and 6-15
(Item No. 5 was pulled for separate discussion). The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone
and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberrs who was absent and
Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained with regard to Item No. 16 (Old Town First Street Bridge).
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION
5 Street Name Change from Ynez Road to Ynez Court
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME IN PARCEL MAP
22714 YNEZ ROAD TO YNEZ COURT
By way of overheads, Chief Building Official Elmo clarified the recommendation; reviewed the
staff report (of record); noted that the proposed street name change was intended to eliminate
confusion for emergency response; advised that parcels 1 - 12 will be included in this street name
change; and informed the Councilmembers that the associated lot owners and existing
businesses expressed no concern with regard to this recommendation.
At 8:05 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 9:11 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled
City Council business.
PUBLIC HEARING
17
Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0219
(Conditional Use Permit) - Cox Communications Wireless Personal Communications
System (PCS) with antennas mounted atop a 60-foot high monopole disguised as an
evergreen pine tree (monopine) at the Rancho California Water District water tank site at
3100 Rancho California Road
RECOM MEN DATION:
17.1 Adopt the Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA98-0219;
17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:Vvlinutes\052599
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-
0219 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE
PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0219 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT) TO CONSTRUCT A WIRELESS PERSONAL
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (PCS) FACILITY CONSISTING OF
TWELVE (12) PANEL ANTENNAS, ONE (1) GLOBAL
POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) ANTENNA, AND S IX (6)
CABINETS HOUSING A BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (BTS)
UNIT AND OTHER ELECTRONIC AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT.
THE ANTENNAS WILL BE MOUNTED ATOP A 60-FOOT HIGH
MONOPOLE DISGUISED AS AN EVERGREEN PINE TREE
(MONOPINE) LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
DISTRICT WATER TANK SITE AT 3100 RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 953-060-
022
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Stone moved to continue this public hearing to the June 8, 1999, City
Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Councilman Roberrs who abstained.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
18 Old Town Local Review Board Appointment
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Appoint two members and one alternate to serve full terms on the Old Town Local
Review Board.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this Item.
City Clerk Jones presented the staff report (of record) after which the following motion was
offered:
MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to reappoint Mr. Walt Allen and to appoint Mr. Carl
Ross and Mr. Otto Baron as an alternate. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero
and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent and
Mayor Pro Tem Stone who abstained.
19
City Council Chambers Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Provide direction for the use of the City Council Chambers.
Community Services Director Parker reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material); requested
City Council direction; and advised that this item would be reagendized for the June 22, 1999, City
Council meeting.
R:\Minutes\052599
Councilman Lindemans noted that, in his opinion, the Chamber should not be utilized by anyone
wishing to announce his or her candidacy and that governmental uses, as described in the staff
report, should be permitted.
Councilman Comerchero suggested that the usage of the Chamber for non-profit organizations
should be limited to whether or not there may be a need for live broadcast and requested that no
usage of the Chamber be permitted until an official policy has been adopted.
Considering the City Hall building was paid for by the citizens of this City, Mayor Pro Tern Stone
was of the opinion that an incumbent Councilmember should be permitted to announce his or her
candidacy as long as associated fees are paid by the incumbent. With regard to non-profit
organizations, including the Temecula Valley School District, Mr. Stone was of the opinion that
these organizations should be permitted to utilize the facility as long as there is no conflict with a
governmental meeting.
Councilman Lindemans noted that the School District should be apprised and permitted to utilize
City Council Chambers for its monthly meetings.
Clarifying the Council's intent, City Attorney Thorson stated that the Council may allow
governmental groups and non-profit community and governmental groups.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to direct staff to formulate a City Council Chamber
Policy permitting Chamber usage to governmental groups and community non-profit groups and
that no Chamber usage be permitted until a policy has been adopted. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Lindemans. (Councilman Lindemans withdrew his second to this motion;
see below).
Following additional discussion, Councilman Lindemans withdrew his second to the above-
mentioned motion after which Councilman Comerchero restated his motion.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to direct staff to formulate a City Council Chamber
Policy permitting Chamber usage to governmental and community non-profit groups and that no
Chamber usage should be permitted until the adoption of a policy. The motion was seconded by
Mayor Ford and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Lindemans who
abstained and Councilman Roberts who was absent.
20
Sidewalk Project - Nicolas Road
(Requested by Councilman Stone)
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Oral report.
Advising of the existing approved Tentative Map which has been conditioned to provide the
sidewalk at the time of development, Acting Public Works Director Hughes advised that because
no development activity has been proposed, the matter has been included in the Capital
Improvement Project; that staff has applied for AB 821 funding; and that a reimbursement
agreement is being discussed with the City Attorney.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone reiterated previously made Council comments with regard to a
reimbursement agreement and requested that staff pursue the matter with the associated property
owners.
R:\Minutes\052599
10
SUBSEQUENT NEED ITEM
(Previously approved for discussion; see page 4).
21 Temecula Villas
Housing Redevelopment Manager Meyer presented an overview of the item, advising that
Temecula Villas had a 20-year contract with the Federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development to provide 48 affordable units; that this contract will expire on June 21, 1999; and
that to date, there are seven individuals who have not secured housing after the contract expires.
Having analyzed the impacted individuals' situation, Mr. Meyer advised that it would be staff's
recommendation to relocate these individuals to Rancho West but noted that there may or may
not be units available to accommodate these individuals by the time the contract expires. Further
addressing possible options for these residents, Mr. Meyer suggested that a formal funding
package be agendized and considered by the Council at the June 8,1999, City Council meeting.
City Council discussion ensued during which possible options were considered with Mayor Pro
Tem Stone suggesting that it be determined whether affordable housing may be available on a
temporary basis in neighboring cities.
Mr. Meyer noted that no other HUD contracts will be expiring until the year 2004.
Acting City Manager Nelson noted that this matter may further be addressed at the June 10,
1999, CIP Workshop.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to direct staff to formulate a policy for the June 8,
1999, City Council meeting, which would provide emergency grant monies to subsidize the
residents who will be displaced from Temecula Villas until availability at Mission Village. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No additional comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
In light of ongoing construction due to the Overland Overcrossing Project, Acting Public Works
Director Hughes advised of upcoming freeway closures (June 7 -11, 1999) and briefly
commented on alternate routes.
Acting City Manager Nelson reiterated the City's goal to complete the Overcrossing Project prior
to the opening of the Mall and commended the Public Works Department on a job well done with
regard to expediting this project as well as the Duck Pond project.
Mr. Nelson commended the Finance Department on the receipt of another Award of Excellence,
noting that a formal presentation would be made at the June 8, 1999, City Council meeting.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson noted that there was no reportable action. With regard to the three
litigation items, Mr. Thorson advised that the Agency provided direction and that the real property
item will be considered for approval by the City Council in Open Session.
R:\Minutes\052599
11
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:50 P.M., Mayor Ford formally adiourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, June 8, 1999,
7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula California.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\052599
12
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $2,919,390.57.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Reso~ 99-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clark of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 22rid day of June, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Re~o~
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
06/03/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/10/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/22/99 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/10/99 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TO,1AL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 06/22/99 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
165
190
191
192
193
194.
210
261
280
300
320
330
340
GENERAL FUND
RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
COIvlV~NITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CARTAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
CFD 88-12 N::)MIN EXPENSE FUND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY..CIP
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
100 GENERAL
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
19~ TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
2 0 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
I ~WN N'ELSON, ACTING CITY MANA~~ER
1.193,144.93
140,963.35
124,958.31
4,605
138.40
28,444.52
840.16
1,172,950.45
65.20
35,406.19
2,118.84
10,769.84
3,718.95
13,204.13
138,664.65
3,749.45
31,538.29
67.19
169.78
2,160.80
959.28
1,838.26
670.86
3,348.13
1,395.39
3,498.42
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLO~NING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
328,484.25
378,213.35
2,024,631.51
198,061.45
2,919,395.57
2,731,329.11
165,061.45
2,919,390.57
VOUCHRE2
06/0't/99
08:44
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOI.//MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AHOUNT
75,517.33
1,328.88
25,505.24
2,448.83
71,45
877.03
202,280.19
7,535.25
209.17
4,450.18
347.32
7,524,76
TOTAL 328,484.25
VOUCHRE2
06/03/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
55984
55984
5598/+
55984
55985
55986
55987
55987
55988
55991
55992
55993
55994
55995
55995
55995
55996
55997
55997
55998
55999
56000
56001
56002
56002
56003
56003
56003
56003
56003
56003
56004
56004
O8:44
CHECK
DATE
05/28/99
05/28/99
05/28/99
05/28/99
05/28/99
05/28/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/02/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
003376
003376
003376
003376
003703
003703
001159
001159
001587
000745
000102
001323
001323
001323
003203
002541
002950
001054
000135
000135
000135
000135
000135
000135
002782
002782
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR
NAME
ARTS COUNCIL, THE
ARTS COUNCIL, THE
ARTS COUNCIL, THE
ARTS COUNCIL, THE
BEL AIR CAMERA
BEL AIR CAMERA
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
GREAT RACE LLC
APWA
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TCKT:MAYOR BALL JS/JC/KL/SN/GT
TCKT:MAYOR BALL JSIJCIKLISNIGT
TCKT:MAYOR BALL JSIJC/KL/SN/GT
TCKT:MAYOR BALL JS/JC/KL/SN/GT
DEPST:CAMERA RENTAL FOR MUSEUM
EQUIP & CAMERA RENTAL:MUSEUM
PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
HOST AGRNNT PARTICIPATION FEE
SEMINAR:WATER 1SSUES:6/15/99
A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE DPT
ALTA LONA CHARTER LINES TRANSPORTATION FOR SISTER CITY
AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C FENCE RENTAL:APR-JUL:MUSEUM
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
ARROWHEAD WATER, INC.
DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL
DRINKING WATER FOR CRC
DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL
ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY TEAM PACE MERCHANDISE TO SELL
AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUT REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUT ADDITIONAL ROOM RENTAL
BALTODANO, MARIA
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
BECKER, WALTER KARL INSTALL SIDEWALKS:OLD TOWN
BODY THERAPEUTICS
SUNSCREEN FOR AQUATIC STAFF
CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF SEM:ELEC/MECH CODE:6/16/99
CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN HIG REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN HIG ADDITIONAL ROOM/KITCHEN USE
CENTRAL CITIES SiGN SER SIGN:HANDICAP STALL:R.C,SPT PK
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGN: VAN ACCESSIBLE
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGN:WARNING FOUL BALL TERR]TO
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER NISC HARDWARE
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER HANDICAP ANCHORS
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SALES TAX
CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS 20'DOZ DE'BEER SOFTBALLS
'CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS FREIGHT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-100-999'5260
001-110-999-5260
001-161-999'5260
001-1990
190-1652
210-190'808-5804
001'150'999-5250
190-180'999-5250
280-199-999-5362
001-163-999-5261
001-170-999-5208
001-101-999-5280
210-190-808-5804
340-199-701-5250
190-182-999-5250
340-199-701-5250
001-2175
190-2900
190-183-4990
190-2900
001-1(~.-601-5402
190-183-999-5310
001-162-999-5258
190-2900
190-183-4990
190'180'999'5244
190-180-999-5244
190-180'999-5244
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5244
190-183-999-5380
190-183-999-5380
ITEM
AMOUNT
225.00
75.00
40.18
34.82
5,300.00
275.93
84.00
252.00
2,000.00
105.00
149.41
263.31
285.00
49.76
28.61
153.66
477.33
100.00
40.00-
100.00
1,900.00
120.60
65.00
100.00
30,00-
88.50
44.25
183.50
359.20
150.00
63.97
680.00
70.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
375.00
5,300.00
275.93
336.00
2,000.00
105.00
149.41
263.31
285,00
232,03
477,33
60.00
100.00
1,900.00
120.60
65.00
70,00
889.42
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/05/99 08:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56004 06/03/99 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GOOOS SALES TAX 190-183-999-5380 52.70
56004 06/03/99 002782 CH]CK#S SPORTING GOODS 15-002 DE-BEER SOFTBALLS 190-183-999-5380 592.50
56004 06/03/99 002782 CHICK~S SPORTING GO00S FREIGHT 190-183-999-5380 52.50
56004 06/03/99 002782 CHICK'S SPORTING GO00S SALES TAX 190-18]-999-5380 45.92
56005 06/03/99 001233 DANES FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS 001-164-601-5218 25.33
1,493.62
25.33
56006 06/0]/99 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE RETAIN PUBLIC ADVOCACY FIRM 001-110-999-5248 4,000.00
4,000.00
56007 06/0]/99 DAY, EDWARD REFD:BUILDING PERMIT B98-1070 001-2290 .50
56007 06/03/99 OAY, EDWARD REFD:BUILDING PERMIT B98-1070 001-162-4285 50.]0
50.80
56008 06/03/99 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218 86.80
86.80
56009 06/0]/99 002981 DYNA MED MED EXTRICATION DEVICE W/CASE 190-183-999-5310 58.85
56009 06/03/99 002981 OYNA MEO FIRST AID SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 26.00
56009 06/03/99 002981 OYNA NED FIRST AIO SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 14.50
56009 06/0]/99 002981 OYNA MED FIRST AIO SUPPLIES 190-18]-999-5310 21.00
56009 06/0]/99 002981 .DYNA MEO FIRST AID SUPPLIES 190-18]-999-5310 19.40
56009 06/0]/99 002981 DYNA MED SALES TAX 190-18]-999-5310 10.8]
150.58
56010 06/0]/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/21 MILES 001-16]-999-5118
56010 06/0]/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/21 MILES 001-165-999-5118 324.5]
56010 06/03/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/21 MILES 001-164-604-5118 324.54
56010 06/03/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/21THORNSLEY 001-161-999-5118 2,098.40
56011 06/03/99 003468 FINDLEY REPORTS INC., T DEPOSIT REPT FOR BUDGET DOC 001-140-999-5228 50.00
3,072.00
50.00
56012 06/03/99 000170 FIL~NKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-161-999-5220 105.45
56012 06/03/99 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-161-999-5220 31.31
136,76
56013 06/03/99 FUZIE, ALIX REFUND: TOT PRE-DANCE 190-183-4982 85.00
85.00
56014 06/03/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-6506 JEFF STONE 320-199-999-5208 25.09
56014 06/03/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM ]20-199-999-5208 82.]8
56014 06/03/99 00018/+ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 90969]-0956 GENERAL ~SAGE ]20-199-999-5208 5].92
56014 06/03/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4356 K.HINTERGARDT PRK 320-199-999-5208 30.2]
56014 06/0]/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-8927 GENERAL USAGE ]20-199-999-5208 27.46
56015 06/03/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR 001-150-999-5220 182.98
56015 06/0]/99 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR 001-150-999-5220 108,88
219.08
291,86
56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (20) CARTRIDGES 320-199-999-5221 1,319.80
56016 06/03/99 000192 'GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (2) CD-R DISKETTE 50PK 320-199-999-5221 226.00
56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE (3) ANTISTATIC WIPES 320-199-999-5221 11.97
56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 55.75
56016 06/03/99 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX ]20-199-999-5221 122.78
56017 06/03/99 GREEN, SUSIE REFD: EXERCISE-KUNDALINI YOGA 190-183-4982 30.00
1,736.30
30.00
56018 06/03/99 HUMPHREY, DOUGLAS REFUND: EXERCISE-HATHA YOGA 190-183-4982 37.00 37.00
VOUCHRE2
06/03/99 08:44
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
56019 06/03/99 000388 I C B O, INC.
PUB:UNIFORM BLDG CODE:147H97 001-162-999-5228
70.04
70.04
56020 06/03/99 001429
56020 06/03/99 001429
56020 06/03/99 001429
INACON INFORMATION SYST
INACON INFORMATION SYST
INACON INFORMATION SYST
TOSHIBA AC ADAPTER 320-199-999-5221
FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221
476.00
3.78
37.19
516.97
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX CEDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EOD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDO)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EO0)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EOD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EOD)
56021 06/03/99 000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
000444 SOl 001-2070
000444 SDI 165-2070
000444 SDI 190-2070
000444 SDI 280-2070
000444 SDI 320-2070
000444 SDI 330-2070
000444 SDI 340-2070
000444 STATE 001-2070
000444 STATE 165-2070
000444 STATE 190-2070
000444 STATE 191-2070
000444 STATE 192-2070
000444 STATE 193-2070
000444 STATE 194-2070
000444 STATE 280-2070
000444 STATE 300-2070
000444 STATE 320-2070
000444 STATE 330-2070
000444 STATE 340-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX CIRS) 000283 FEOERAL 165-2070
56022 06/03/99 00028:3 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 -INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 194-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 300-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL -- 320-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEOERAL 340-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 165-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 190-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 191-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 192-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEOICARE 193-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 194-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070
56022 06/03/99 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 340-2070
78.80
2.99
55.40
.74
3.50
3.66
3.10
5,282.66
110.81
857.46
1.48
3.53
57.26
21.69
42.65
12.08
194,18
26.56
110.93
19,673.49
384.15
3,863.84
8.70
22.03
299.72
126.61
132.69
41.94
790.82
124.26
511.86
4,962.23
135.42
1,135.9?
2.43
6.18
76.60
34.38
56.48
24.17
165.62
49.50
128.36
6,869.48
32,757.45
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/03/99 08:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56023 06/03/99 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212
177.7~
177.79
56024 06/03/99 IRONS, KAREN REFD: GOLF LESSONS BEG 190-183-4982
50.00
50.00
56025 06/03/99 003683 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC 1- TDC-8 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECT 001-164-602-5Z4Z 1,850.00
56025 06/03/99 003683 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC FREIGHT 001-164-602-5242 15.00
1,865.00
56026 06/03/99 002575 JONES, SUSAN W. REIMB: INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH 001-120-999-5260 32.72
32.72
56027 06/03/99 003501 K C DEVELOPMENT
FACADE IMPROV PRGM: KRIEGER'S 280-199-813-5804 5,000.00
5,000.00
56028 06/03/99 002909 K W C ENGINEERING, INC. MAY DESIGN SVCS R.C. SPRT PRK 210-190-154-5802 21.25
21.25
56029 06/03/99 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 84.80
56029 06/03/99 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 162.14
56029 06/03/99 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 288.68
535.62
56030 06/03/99 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC LDSC & MAINT SUPPLIES 001-164-601-5218
20.58
20.58
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE RESO, ORD & MINUTE BOOKS 001-120-999-5220 773.20
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 31.80
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 26.50
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 47.70
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE CUSTOM TABS FOR BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 20.00
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE SALES TAX 001-120-999-5220 69.69
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE BINDERS FOR PERMANENT RECORDS 001-120-999-5220 193.30
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE CUSTOM TABS FOR BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 20.00
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE AGENCY NAME PRINTED ON BINDER 001-120-999-5220 13.25
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE PRINTING ON BINDERS 001-120-999-5220 15.90
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE SALES TAX 001-120-999-5220 18.79
56031 06/03/99 001690 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONE FREIGHT 001-120-999-5220 21.07
1,251.20
56032 06/03/99 LORD, WILLIAM REFUND: PICNIC SHELTER RENTAL 190-183-4988 25.00
25.00
56033 06/03/99 LSA ASOCIATES, INC. OVERPAYMENT OF PLANNING FEES 001-2650 7.00
7.00
56034 06/03/99 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 352,80
352.80
56035 06/03/99 MEDINA, TINA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
56035 06/03/99 .MEOINA, TINA ADD'L HOURS FOR RCX)M RENTAL 190-183-4990 25.00-
75. O0
56036 06/03/99 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 320.00
56036 06/03/99 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 160.00
480,00
56037 06/03/99 003241 MILLAR HEATING & AIR, I ELECTRICAL SVCS:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 1,200.00
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 25,089.23
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 693.64
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,438.76
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 13.28
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2390 33.93
1,200.00
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA
06/03/99 08:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 'PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390
56038 06/03/99 000Z46 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 191-2130
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS CEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 192-2130
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS CEMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 193-2130
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 194-2130
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 192-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET]RE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-Z390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET]RE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
S6038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
56038 06/03/99 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390
402.62
196.69
301
130.52
821.85
142.41
491.04
100.6/+
2.81
5.62
39.33
8.43
76.7'5
1.87
14.82
,05
.14
1.50
.84
.92
.46
1.86
.93
2,18
33,014,87
56040 06/03/99 000894 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS, OFFICE SUPPLIES:PLANNING DEPT 001-1990
400.21
400.21
56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATES:PLANNING COMM. 001-161-999-5222
56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATES:TRAFFIC SAFETY COMM 001-164-602-5222
56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATES:COMM. SVC. COMM. 190-180-999-5222
56041 06/03/99 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF NAMEPLATE HOLOERS:COUNCIL 001-100-999-5220
93.47
93.47
93.47
12.94
293.35
56042 06/03/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-99-OZOO3-O:FLOATING MTR 001-164-601-5250 302.63
56042 06/03/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O2-79-10100-1:NW SPORTS PK 190-1270 315.26
617.89
56043 06/03/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 190-180-999-5214
56043 06/03/99 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS 340-199-701-5214
19.50
6.00 25.50
56044 06/03/99 003708 RIVERSIDE CO BUILDING S PROP. ACQUISITION:S79/LA PAZ 210-165-693-5700 187,530.00 187,530.00
56045 06/03/99 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION REDUCE RET.5%:WINCH/I-15:97-03 210-2035 14,168.01 14,168.01
56046 06/03/99 001288 SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOUR ADVERTISEMENTS:ECON. DEV. 001'111-999-5270 2,500.00 2,500.00
56047 06/03/99 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY OPERATING PERMIT CRC GENERATOR 190-182-999-5250 175.60
175.60
56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:2-11-OOT-O455:6TH ST 001-164-603-5240 291.84
56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:2-O6-105-O654:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5319 1,892.17
56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:Z-14-204-1615:FRNT ST RDIO 340-199-701-5240 19.55
56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON MAY:2-19-184-1824:RANCHO CALF. 191-180-999-5319 166.17
56048 06/03/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON MAY:Z-15-830-Z307:FRONT ST 190-199-999-5240 39.00
VOUCHRE2
06/03/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56048
56048
56048
56048
56048
56048
56048
56048
56048
56048
56048
56049
56050
56051
56052
56052
56052
56052
56052
56053
08:44
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
06/03/99
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
003654 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & STO
TEMECULA LEARNING CENTE
003140 -TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKI. ION
003031
003031
003031
003031
003031
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
TVUSD
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MAY:2-18-937-3152:MORENO RD
MAY:2-19-111-4834:BEDFORD TC1
NAY:Z-O2-351-4946:SENIOR CTR
NAY:Z-OO-397-5042:CITY HALL
MAY:Z-18-O49-6416:FRONT ST PED
MAY:2-19-321-6512:RANCHO CALF.
NAY:2-18-555-7006:MORENO RD TC
MAY:2-18-799-7911:MORENO RD TC
MAY:2-OZ-502-8077:NAINT. FAC.
MAY:2-19-171-8568:TEM.WED,CHPL
MAY:64-77-350-1600-91:MCCABE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL:T,V.MUSEUM
FY 98-99 CSF PROGRAM AWARD
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
12LB DELINEATORS
SALES TAX
SAFETY VESTS:PW MAINT CREW
CREDIT: SERVICE CHARGE
CREDIT: RETURNED MERCHANDISE
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-185 -999- 5240
191-180-999-5319
190-181-999-5240
340 - 199- 701 - 524 O
001 ' 164'603'5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
340-1990
190 - 185 - 999 - 5240
190 - 180 - 999 - 5240
190-185-999-5415
001-101-999-5267
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5Z42
190-180-999-5242
001-164-601-5218
190-180-999-5242
001-164-601-5218
190-2900
ITEM
AMOUNT
77.95
82.22
747.50
4,219.43
179.85
116.43
106.17
56.92
628.89
37.79
2,086.43
675.00
2,000.00
60.00
380.00
29.45
187.49
20.00-
187.49-
109.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
10,748.31
675.00
2,000.00
60.00
389.45
109.00
TOTAL CHECKS
328,484.25
VOUCNRE2
06/10/99
12:10
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 14
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~//MOD SET ASIDE
190 CONMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
AMOUNT
113,766.11
138,264.62
50,378.70
907.11
66.97
5,379.49
451,52
39,780.69
13,830.89
557.59
6,319.66
3w371.63
5,138.37
TOTAL 378,213.35
VOLICHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/10/99 12:10' VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56054 06/03/99
COLORADO, UNIVERSITY OF ROOH:MUN CLERKS:7/11-16:BALLRE 001-120-999-5261
704.50
704.50
56055 06/08/99 002652 OSCAR'S
CLOSED SESSION MTG REFRESHMENT 001-100-999-5260
126.47
126.47
56056 06/08/99 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
56056 06/08/99 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS
001-150-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
42.00
336.00
3?8.00
56057 06/09/99 001159 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST PROCESSING FEE:EMPLEE PRINTS 190-180-999-5250
42.00
42.00
56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310
56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310
56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310
56060 06/10/99 000116 A V P VISION PLANS COBRA/GREEK/JUNE/VISION 001-1180
594,78
29.75
18.58
18.58
661,69
56061 06/10/99 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING, INC. JUN BILLBOARD AD:OLD TUN PRONO 280-199-999-5362 1,700.00
1,700.00
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 CANCER 001-2330 234.50
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330 202.13
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330 55.80
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 EXP PROT 300-2330 5.47
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 HOSP IC 001-2330 17.50
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 STD 001-2330 660.80
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 STD 190-2330 112.00
56062 06/10/99 003552 AFLAC 003552 STD 300-2330 8.00
1,296.20
56063 06/10/99 002662 AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTR SVS TO CAPTURE & CAGE DUCKS 190-180-999-5250 400.00
400.00
56064 06/10/99 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS COMPUTER SERVER (MUSEUM) 320-1970 2,035.00
56064 06/10/99 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS SALES TAX 320-1970 157.71
2,192.71
56065 06/10/99 003693 AMERICAN ASSN. OF MUSEU JOB ANNOUNCEMENT AD:MUSEUM MGR 190-185-999-5254 290.40
290.40
56066 06/10/99 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 73.45
73.45
56067 06/10/99 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN C ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: B.WEDEKING 190-180-999-5214
43,00
43.00
56068 06/10/99 000122 B S N SPORTS MINI MEGAPHONE FOR SAFETY CONM 001-110-999-5278 235.80
56068 06/10/99 000122 B S N SPORTS FREIGHT 001-110-999-5278 28.30
56068 06/10/99 000122 B S N SPORTS SALES TAX 001-110-999-5278 18.27
282.37
56069 06/10/99 002506 BAILEY'S BLINDS & DRAPE BLINDS:FIRE MARSHALL OFFICE 340-199-701'5250
47.36
47.36
56070 06/10/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SVCS.-SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 90.00
56070 06/10/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER TCC ICE MACHINE (]CE-O-MATIC) 190-184-999-5610 2,195.00
56070 06/10/99 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 107.00
2,392.00
56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS, CONP INSURANCE 001-2370 3,172.15
56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 165-2370 69.31
56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 190-2370 980.77
56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 191-2370 .66
56071 06/10/99 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 192-2370 1.66
VOUCHRE2
06/10/99 12:10
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/~9 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
56071 06/10/99 000128
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES
NAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 193-2370
MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 194-2370
MAY 99 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 280'2370
MAY 99 I,IORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 300-2370
MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 320-2370
MAY 99 NORKERS~ CONP INSURANCE 330-2370
MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 340-2370
MAY 99 I,IORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 001-140-999-5112
HAY 99 I,/ORKERS~ CONP INSURANCE 280-199-999-5112
MAY 99 WORKERS' CONP INSURANCE 190-181-999-5112
42.75
16.60
25.26
6.17
45.52
12.94
207.08
.48
3.41
4.26
4,589.02
56072 06/10/99 000152 CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:COMMISSIONER 190-180-999-5226
190.00
190.00
56073 06/10/99 005629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAR/APR SVCS:PALA INSPECTIONS 210-165-631-5801
56073 06/10/99 003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAY INSPECTION SVCS:PALA RD 210-165-631-5801
1,569.50
2,666.00
4,235.50
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 001-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 165-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 190-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 191-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 192-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 193-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 194-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 280-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 300-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 320-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 330-2360
56074 06/10/99 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 340-2360
575.26
13.01
103.52
.98
10.57
5.84
6.49
3.24
13.00
6.50
15.26
754.00
56075 06/10/99 002534 CATERERS CAFE, THE REFRESHMENT: STAFF MEETING 001-162-999-5261
119.22
119.22
56076 06/10/99 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING - CRC 190-182-999-5250
56076 06/10/99 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING-SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5250
50.00
45.00
95.00
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 001-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 165-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 190-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 191-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 192-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 193-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 194-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 280-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 300-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 320-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 330-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 LTD 340-2380
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 001-2500
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 165-2500
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 190-2500
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 191-2500
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 192-2500
1,335.98
37.20
217.06
.76
1.93
22.98
10.85
16.41
7.12
37.36
8.08
27.53
1,864.79
51.94
302.96
1.06
2.69
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56077 06/10/99 003553 ClGNA 003553 STD 193-2500 32.07
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 194-2500 15.14
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 280-2500 22.90
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 300-2500 9.94
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 320-2500 52.14
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 330-2500 11.28
56077 06/10/99 003553 CIGNA 003553 STD 340-2500 38.45
4,128.62
56079 06/10/99 002989 CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CLEA CITY HALL WINDOW CLEANING 340-199-701'5212 385.00 385.00
56080 06/10/99 003184 COACHELLA VALLY HOUSING ANNUAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 165-q99-811-5804 130,000.00 130,000.00
56081 06/10/99 001193 COMP USA, INC. MlSC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 1,231.78
1,231.78
56082 06/10/99 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 69.80
69.80
56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 108.00
56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212 83.02
56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- 6TH STREE 001-164-603-5218 656.52
56083 06/10/99 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORP. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES- 6TH STREE 001-164-603-5218 986.8]
1,834.37
56084 06/10/99 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. TRAFF.COUNT CONSENSUS:MARG.RD. 001-164-602-5406
56084 06/10/99 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED, INC. TRAFF.COUNT CONSENSUS CITYWIDE 001-164-602-5406
180.00
1,105.00
1,285.00
56085 06/10/99 003625 DAVIS, JOHN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 180.00
180.00
56086 06/10/99 DIABETES ASSOCIATION DONATION ON BEHALF OF B.MCKEON 001-2170 50.00
50.00
56087 06/10/99 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK MAY 99 SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE 300-2180 348.72
348.72
56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/09 WIGHTMAN 001-111-999-5118 156.00
56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/09 WIGHTMAN 001-150-999-5118 55.25
56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/16 WIGHTMAN 001-111-999-5118 260.00
56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/23 WIGHTMAN 001-111-999-5118 260.00
56088 06/10/99 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TEMP HELP W/E 05/30 WIGHTMAN 001-!11-999-5118 260.00
991.25
56089 06/10/99 003610 DOMENOE, JIM REIMB:CD ROM DRIVE:STOREFRONT 001-170-999-5229 64.64
64.64
56090 06/10/99 003719 DOOL, EDWARD LEASE PYMTS APPLIED TO CONSTRU 280-199-4075 10,179.00
56090 06/10/99 003719 DOOL, EDWARD LEASE PYMTS APPLIED TO CONSTRU 001-164-601-5402 250.00-
9,929.00
56091 06/10/99 002466 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY JUNE ELEVATOR SVC/MTNC:C.HALL 340-199-701-5212
202.00
202.00
56092 06/10/99 DUCKWILER, LOURDES REFUND: MUSIC-INSTANT PIANO 190-183-4980 20.00
20.00
56093 06/10/99 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI REMOVAL 001-164-601-5218 112.81
112.81
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21WILLIAMS 001-161-999~5118 551.76
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 WILLJAMS 001-162-999-5118 551.76
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/21GORMAN 001-162-999-5118 451.39
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21GORMAN 001-162-999-5118 1,438.94
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/10/99 12=10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21DEGANGE 001-161-999-5118
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/21 HILLBERG 165-199-999-5118
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 SERVEN 001-164-603-5118
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 SERVEN 190-180-999-5118
56094 06/10/99 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 05/21 SERVEN 193-180-999-5118
56095 06/10/99 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER OVRLD DR SEWER LINE RELOCATION 210-165-604-5804
56096 06/10/99 003705 EDA JOB TRAINING RVSD EDA KIOSK CONTENT AGREMNT 001-111-999-5270
2,858.40
1,233.60
375.84
375.84
742.72
1,8~6.39
900.00
8,580.25
1,846.39
900.00
56097 06/10/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE BALLFIELD PREPS (MAR/APR/MAY) 190-180-999-5415
56097 06/10/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LDSCP REPAIRS: CRC SOUTH SIDE 190-182-999-5415
56097 06/10/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP REPAIRS:MARGARITA SC 190-180-999-5415
56098 06/10/99 002037 EXPANETS (3) 2" SLEAVES FOR MAINT FAC 210-190-158-5804
56098 06/10/99 00Z037 EXPANETS CABLiNG 2ND FLOOR MAINT FAC 210-190-158-5804
56098 06/10/99 002037 EXPANETS TELEPHONE MAZNT & REPAIRS 320-199-999-5215
56099 06/10/99 000478 FAST SIGNS TCSD SIGNS FOR NEW SVC TRUCK 190-180-999-5214
3,225.00
1,080.00
35.93
507.80
1,446.00
44.00
43.23
4,340.93
1,997,80
43.23
56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230
56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230
56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999-5230
56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230
56100 06/10/99 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230
44.75
73.50
16.25
12.75
30.25
177.50
56101 06/10/99 FINLEY, GABRIELLE
REIMB:VOORBURG VISIT EXPENSES 001-101-999-5280
280.39
280.39
56102 06/10/99 000166 FIRST AHERICAN TITLE CO TITLE INSURANCE POLICY PW97-07 210-165-681-5804
360.00
360.00
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-7824 COHERCHERO:NETHERLDS 001-100-999-5258
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-9152 K.LINDEMANS:PALM SPG 001-100-999-5258
56103 06/10/p9 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER XXXX-9277 R.ROBERTS:SACRANENTO 001-100-999-5258
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-9277 R.ROBERTS: PROF MTG 001-100-999-5260
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES:JOBTRAK CORP 001-150-999-5254
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES:SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5223
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES: GIFTS VOORB 001-101-999-5280
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-6165 G.YATES:MMASC MTG 001-150-999-5260
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-1405 D.UBNOSKE: PROF MTGS 001-1990
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-0432 A.ELMO: PROF MTG 001-162-999-5260
56103 06/10/99 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XXXX-1143 H.PARKER: PROF MTG 190-1990
56104 06/10/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 506-2626 POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5229
56104 06/10/99 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 695-3539 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
85.63
381.59
508.44
21.37
180.00
84.98
52.41
462.90
88.53
11.90
58.50
293.21
36.91
1,936.25
330.12
56105 06/10/99 GOVE, JULIE
REFUND: ART/CRAFTS-ARTISTIC 190-183-4980
6.00
6.00
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES:STATION 84 001-171-999-5212
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES - SPORT PRGM 190-183-999-5380
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPL[ES- PW MAINT 001-164-601-5218
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARDWARE SUPPLIES - CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212
197.87
243.18
54.82
185.07
VOUCHRE2
06/10/99 lZ:10
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
ANOtJNT
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS NARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC,
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC,
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
56106 06/10/99 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
VARIOUS TOOLS FOR
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
HARDWARE SUPPLIES
- CRC 190-182-999-5212
- CRC 190-182-999-5212
- B & S 001-162-999-5215
MAINT CREWS 190-180-999-5242
MAINT CREWS 190-181-999-5242
MAINT CREWS 190-182-999-5242
MAINT CREWS 190-184-999-5242
MAINT CREWS 340-1990
MAINT CREWS 340-199-702-5242
MAINT CREWS 001-164-605-5242
MAINT CREWS 001-164-605-5242
- PARKS 190-180-999-5212
- SR CENTER 190-181-999-5212
- TCC 190-184-999-5212
- PW INSPECT 001-163-999-5218
- PW INSPECT 001-164-601-5218
617.25
793.04
350.25
266.50
136.10
136.10
340.25
204.15
136.10
204.15
.01
683,29
23.09
105.25
205,21
71.22
4,952.90
56108 06/10/99 002572 HARMON, JUDY
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330
455.20
455.20
56109 06/10/99 HEWITT, SARAH
56109 06/10/99 HEWITT, SARAH
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
ADDITIONAL ROOM USE CHARGE
190-2900
190-183-4990
100.00
62.75-
37.25
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
56110 06/10/99 002107
HIGHMARK, INC.
HIGHMARK, INC.
HIGHMARK, INC.
HIGHMARK, INC.
HIGHMARK INC.
HIGHMARK INC.
HIGHMARK INC.
HIGHMARK INC,
HIGHMARK INC.
HIGHMARK INC.
HIGHMARK INC,
HIGHMARK INC.
HIGHMARK INC.
HIGHMARK INC,
002107 VL ADVAN 001-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510
002107 VL REVER 001-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 001-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 190-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 192-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 193-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 194-2510
002107 VOL LIFE 340-2510
198.15
195.95
7.68
1.70
5.40
4.68
204.95-
187.15
7.68
1.70
3.40
4.68
409.90
56111 06/10/99 001013
56111 06/10/99 001013
56111 06/10/99 001013
HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS
HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS
HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS
SALES TAX AUDIT FOR 2ND QTR
SALES TAX RECOVERY FEE
PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVS.
001-140-999-5248
001-140-999-5248
001-140-999-5248
9O0.00
1,205.19
2,400.00
4,505,19
56112 06/10/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
56112 06/10/99 002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE 001-170-999-5214
MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE 001-170-999-5214
26.66
18.88
45.54
56113 06/10/99 000388 I C B O, INC.
ESTAB BLDG PERMIT FEES WKBK 001-162-999-5228
25.86
25.86
56114 06/10/.99 000194
56114 06/10/99 000194
56114 06/10/99 000194
56114 06/10/99 000194
RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 001-2080 1,954.23
RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 165-2080 18.75
RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 263.56
RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CONP 280-2080 32.82
2,269.36
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPTiON NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56115 06/10/99 001573 INLAND EMPIRE TOURISM C PARTICIPATION:REGIONAL VISITOR 001-111-999-5270 3,000.00
3,000.00
56116 06/10/99 003670 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR CO FIRE STATION GARAGE DOOR REPAR 001-171-999-5212 640.00
640.00
56117 06/10/99 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140 275.27 275.27
56118 06/10/99 001894 JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY DESILTING POND-CATCH BASIN:CRC 190-180-999-5416 380.00
380.00
56119 06/10/99 000210 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES - PUBLICATION: CAL MUNI LAW HDBK 001-120-999-5228 150.00
150.00
56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 BROMNET 001-110-999-5118 185.76
56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 LUQUE 340-199-701-5118 211.40
56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/23 LUQUE 340-199-701-5118 211.40
56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 COOK 001-165-999-5118 139.32
56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/16 COOK 001-164-604-5118 139.32
56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/23 BELIAN 001-171-999-5118 557.28
56120 06/10/99 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP (2)W/E 5/23 BELIAN 001-162-999-5118 371.52
1,816.00
56121 06/10/99 003644 MASTER BUILDING SPECIAL INSTALL RESTROOM EQUIP:SPRTSPK 190-180-999-5212 724.00
724.00
56122 06/10/99 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. PRINT SVCS:QTRLY TRAFF.NEWSLTR 001-110-999-5222
3,411.36
3,411.36
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALHL 001-2340 3,101.25
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 165-2340 103.83
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE iNSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 190-2340 287.76
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 193-2340 21.44
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 280-2340 62.29
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 300-2340 20.76
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 340-2340 83.06
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP WRONG PREMIUM PULLED 001-2340 53.05-
56123 06/10/99 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP COBRA/GREEK/DENTAL/JUNE 001-1180 83.06
3,710.40
56124 06/10/99 003241
56124 06/10/99 003241
56124 06/10/99 003241
56124 06/10/99 003241
56124 06/10/99 003241
56124 06/10/99 003241
MILLAR HEATING & AIR,
MILLAR HEATING & AIR,
MILLAR HEATING & AiR,
MILLAR HEATING & AIR~
MILLAR HEATING & AIR,
MILLAR HEATING & AIR,
MAY HVAC MAINT.SVCS:CRC
MAY HVAC MAINT,SVCS:TCC
MAY HVAC MA[NT.SVCS:CITY HALL
MAY HVAC MA[NT.SVCS:MAINT,FAC,
MAY HVAC MAINT.SVCS:SEN[OR CTR
REPAIR HVAC:CITY HALL
190-182-999-5250 500.00
190-184-999-5250 150.00
340-199-701-5250 1,300.00
340-199-702-5250 100.00
190-181-999-5250 150.00
340-199-701-5250 90.00
2,290.00
56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS STATIONARY & PRINTING SERVS 001-161-999-5222 91.44
56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222 7.09
56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS STATIONARY & PRINTING SERVS 001-162-999-5222 139.32
56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS CITY LOGO ENVELOPES- TWO CASES 190-182-999-5220 176.82
56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 190-182-999-5220 13.70
56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS. CARDS:G.THORNHILL 001-161-999-5222 102.50
56125 06/10/99 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222 7.94
538.81
56126 06/10/99 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI DRINKING FOUNT. SUPPLIES:PARKS 190-180-999-5212 114.00
114.00
56127 06/10/99 NATtL BUS t,~3MENtS LDRSH CONF:AUG 5-6:L NORTON 001-140-999-5261 199.00 199.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VCXJCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUHBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56128 06/10/99 000930 NATIONAL EMBLEM, INC. UNIFORM PATCHES FOR TEN POLICE 001-170-999-5243 1,164.67
56128 06/10/99 000930 NATIONAL EMBLEM, INC. SALES TAX 001-170-999-5243 91.92
1,256.59
56129 06/10/99 003686 NETVIZ CORPORATION NETVIZ 4 PROFESSIONAL EDITION 320'199'999'5211 589.00
56129 06/10/99 003686 NETVIZ CORPORATION NETVIZ 4 PRO ANN SOFTWARE MAIN 320-199-999-5211 175.00
56129 06/10/99 003686 NETVIZ CORPORATION FREIGHT 320-199-999-5211 15.00
779. O0
56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT CIP PROJECT UPDATE ADS:PW 001-165-999-5256 172.22
56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT PLANNING COMM. VACANCY ADS 001-120-999-5254 184.57
56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT NARG. COMN. PARK DEOICAT. AO 190-1990 319.91
56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT CIP PROJECT UPOATE ADS:PW 001-165-999-5256 344.47
56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT SKATE COMPETITION ADS:SKATE PK 190-180-999-5254 114.41
56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT ADVERTISEMENT FOR ROA COMM. 001-120-999-5254 61.52
56130 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT EGG HUNT ADVERTISEMENT:TCSD 190-180-999-5254 123.05
1,320.15
56131 06/10/99 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 1YR NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 001-140-999-5228
8~.00
84.00
56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 160.01
56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 127.68
56132 06/10/99 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT 190-180-999-5214 19.19
56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT 001-164-601-5214 47.50
56132 06/10/99 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 108.24
56132 06/10/99 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 20.15
56132 06/10/99 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 28.22
510.99
56133 06/10/99 003177 P B LOADER CORPORATION PARTS FOR PW PATCH TRUCK 001-164-601-5214 132.90
56133 06/10/99 003177 P B LOADER CORPORATION FREIGHT 001-164-601-5214 12.00
56133 06/10/99 003177 P B LOADER CORPORATION SALES TAX 001-164-601-5214 11.23
156.13
56134 06/10/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAY CONSULTING SERVICES 165-199-999-5248 1,163.72
56134 06/10/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAY CONSULTING SERVICES 280-199-999-5248 1,163.72
56134 06/10/99 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. MAY CONSULTING SERVICES 001-111-999-5248 410.71
2,738.15
56135 06/10/99 003143 PAINTING BY KIETH WOOD RES IMPROVE PROG:RODUE,H & 0 165-199-813-5804 2,670.00
2,670.00
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001-2090 459.37
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 165-2090 215.66
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 190-2090 251.60
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 194-2090 83.86
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 280-2090 71.88
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 1,360.51
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 190-2090 370.65
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 280-2090 3.57
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 001-2090 758.22
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 40.84
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 001-2090 6,292.28
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 190-2090 823.67
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 191-2090 16.49
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 192-2090 54.25
56136 06/10/99 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 193-2090 431.74
56136 06/10/~9 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 194-2090 263.02
VOUCHRE2
06/10/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
561~6
561~6
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56136
56137
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
56138
12:10
CHECK
DATE
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06110199
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
001958
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
VENDOR
NAME
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 KAISER
000245 KAISER
000245 PAClFICR
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PAClFICR
000245 PC
000245 PERS CHO
000245 PERS DED
000245 PERS-ADN
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 BLSHIELD
000245 CZGNA
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 HELTHNET
000245 KAISER
000245 PAC]FICR
000245 PACIFICR
000245 PACIFZCR
000245 PERS CHO
000245 PERS REV
001958 PERS L-T
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSERENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIRBURSENENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSERENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSERENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280 - 2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001 - 2090
001-2090
O01 - 2090
165 - 2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
193 - 2090
O01 - 2090
001-2090
001-2122
001-161-999-5262
001-161-999-5261
001-161-999-5261
001-161-610-5261
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5212
190-183-999-5320
001-150-999-5260
190-183-999-5320
001-162-999-5261
190-180-999-5261
190-180-999-5212
001-162-999-5220
001-164-601-5260
001-120-999-5220
001-100-999-5260
190-180-999-5212
001-140-999-5260
001-2175
280-199-999-5260
165-199-999-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
3.83
164.41
870.29
2,233,26
164.8~
5,188.75
802.90
19.72
562.00
2,535.16
1,317.35
136.92
43.82
111.43
37.14
18.92
83.52
2.14
57.86
27.42
8.A8
277.20
31.81
1.67
168,84
1,203.66-
19.75
15.00
11.43
2.00
4O.77
32.32
17.93
9.95
36.00
8.90
30.00
26.93
12.57
15.00
30.13
11.99
32.32
13.50
7.53
10.12
10,12
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
25,497.03
B.~
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06110/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56138 06/10/p9 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5242
56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-602-5258
56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5261
56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEHENT 001-171-999-5261
56138 06/10/99 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5250
4.84
25.00
18.88
15.00
23.32
481.30
56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 190-180-999-5230
56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAiL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230
56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230
56140 06/10/99 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-100-999-5230
43.25
78.50
45.25
11.75
178.75
56141 06/10199 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA POSTAGE FOR TRAFFIC NEWSLETTER 001-110-999-5230
56141 06/10/99 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA CREDIT FOR PRIOR POSTAGE PAID 190-180-999-5230
56141 06/10/99 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA CREDIT FOR PRIOR POSTAGE PAID 001-110-999-5230
2,704.00
1,676.48-
241.67-
785.85
56142 06/10/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COOPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PW 98-12 001-120-999-5256
56142 06/10/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COOPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:DO01 001-120-999-5256
56142 06/10/99 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COOPAN PUBLIC NOTICE:PW98-18 001-120-999-5256
76.14
24.00
65.33
165.47
56143 06/10/99 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL:CRC 190-180-999-5238
1/,6.11
146.11
56144 06/10/99 002793 ~UICK WRAP BAG
PACKAGING SUPPLIES:PLANNiNG 001-161-999-5230
43.62
43.62
56145 06/10/99 003308 R D 0 RENTAL COOPANY MAY EQU/P.RENTAL:PW MAINT.CW. 001-164-601-5238
195.57
195,57
56146 06/10/99 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221
56146 06/10/99 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC. MlSC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221
15.91
178.29
194.20
56147 06/10/99 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB BACKFLOU TESTING:VAR.PARKS 193-180-999-5212
125.00
125.00
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-OS-OO111-O=WINCH.RD.LSC 191-180-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-26305-O:OT FRONT ST 001-164-603-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-27924-2:NORENO RD 190-185-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-27999-1:MORENO RD DC 190-185-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-30205-O:6TH ST. LSCP 001-164-603-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-30206-O:6TH ST. LSCP 001-164-603-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O6-55015-O=OT FRONT ST 001-164-603-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:OI-O6-6OOOS-O:MAIN STREET 001-164-603-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84860-5:PUJOL ST 280-199-807-5801
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MAY:O1-O2-98000-O:PAUBA RD-DC 001-171-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-181-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-182-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-184-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240
56148 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 340-199-701-5240
29.48
125.72
46.42
9.62
65.69
33.23
36.91
9.62
40.58
9.62
7,377.63
108.21
835.75
233.72
243.85
3,170.40
405.74
12,782.19
56149 06/10/99 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 4TH JULY WATER HOOK-UP:PAUBA 190-1990
56150 06/10/~9 RANCHO CREEK APARTMENTS REIMBURSEMENT FOR FENCE REPAIR 001-164-601-5401
750.00
575.00
750.00
575.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 10
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56151 06/10/99 003591 RENES COHMERCIAL MANAGE WEED ABATEMENT:CITYWIDE 001-164-601-5402
56151 06/10/99 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE PEST CONTROL:R.VISTA/V.BRISAS 001-164-601-5402
1,075.00
2,520.00
3,595.00
56152 06/10/99 000266 RIGHTWAY JUN EQU[P.RENTAL:R[VERTON PARK 190-180-999-5238 62.89
62.89
56153 06/10/99 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR PARKING C[T ASSESS FOR MAR 99 001-2260 2,127.00
56153 06/10/99 000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR PARKING CIT ASSESS FOR MAR 99 001-2265 605.00
2,732.00
56154 06/10/99 000955 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'B FUNDRAISER:ROTARY CLUB:S/08/99 001'170-999-5370 224.50
224.50
56155 06/10/99 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & APR ENG.SVCS:S.GERTRUDIS TRAIL 210-190-147-5802 4,000.00
56155 06/10/99 000271 ROBERT REIN, t~4 FROST & APR CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SVC 210-165-686-5804 3,385.00
7,385.00
56156 06/10/99 003001 ROSS FENCE COMPANY RES IMPRV PROG:RODUE/FENCE WRK 165-199-813-5804
1,898.00
1,898.00
56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 29.95
56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 52.42
56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:CRC POOL GATE 190-182-999-5212 142.00
56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LABOR. 190-182-999-5212 170.00
56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH SALES TAX 190-182-999-5212 11.01
56157 06/10/99 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:CRC FACILITY 190-182-999-5212 1,429.11
1,834.49
56158 06/10/99 003689 SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE ADVERTISING:MRKT PRGN
001-111'999-5270 2,000.00 2,000.00
56159 06/10/99 003694 SARAKKI ASSOCIATES CONSULT SVCS:TRAFF.MONITOR.SYS 210-165-607-5801 2,000.00
2,000.00
56160 06/10/99 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA MAY POOL MAINT SVC:TES 190-180-999-5212 318.00
318.00
56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR TEEN ACTIVITIES 190-183-999-5320 44.29
56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR TINY TOTS 190-183-999-5320 70.36
56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS 001-150-999-5260 115,10
56161 06/10/99 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. MTG SUPPLIES: CITY MGR OFFICE 001-110-999-5260 19.61
249.36
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:Z-10-331-Z153:TCC 190-184-999-5240 607.90
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON JUN:2-19-249-3989:MARG. LS3 191-180-999-5319 27.10
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:Z-OO-397-5067:VARIOOS MTRS 191-180-999-5240 12.53
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:2-OO-397-5067:VARIOOS MTRS 193-180-999-5240 703.86
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-15-671-5518:PALA RD TC1 191-180-999-5319 136.70
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-348-6315:MARG.RD.TC1 191-180-999-5319 96.48
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-589-9739:MARG.RD.LS3 191-180-999-5319 52.60
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-528-9980:SANTIAGO RD 191-180-999-5319 179.88
56162 06/10/99 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON MAY:65-77-804-6630-O1:RNBO CYN 191-180-999-5240 108.08
1,925.13
56163 06/10/99 STAPLES INC
COPIER FOR STOREFRONT OFFICE 001-170-999-5229 1,069.73
1,069.73
56164 06/10/99 003682 SULLIVAN SANDBLASTING REMOVE OLD ST.STRIPING:MARG/RC 001-164-602-5410 4,900.00
4,900.00
56165 06/10/99 003586 SUNBADGE COMPANY BADGES FOR TEMECULA POLICE 001-170-999-5243 302.50
56165 06/10/99 003586 SUNBADGE COMPANY FREIGHT 001-170-999-5243 5.00
56165 06/10/99 003586 SUNBADGE COMPANY SALES TAX 001-170-999-5243 21.93
329.43
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
06/10/99 12:10 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 11
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRZPTZON NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56166 06/10/99 T W ~ELDING 5 SOILS PROBE EQUIP FOR CIP 001-165-999-5242 150.00
150.00
56167 06/10/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 77.36
56167 06/10/99 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES:REC TEEN ROOM 190-2910 22.60
99.96
56168 06/10/99 003375 TAYLOR, BEA VOLUNTEER WORK:OLD TOWN/MAY 99 280-199-999-5250 50.00
50.00
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 472.95
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 82.00
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 1.03
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 192-2125 2.05
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 14.35
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 3.07
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 19.05
56169 06/10/99 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 20.50
615.00
56170 06/10/99 003673 TECH 101/ARCUS, INC. HP LASERJET 320-199-999-5242 599.00
56170 06/10/99 003673 TECH 101/ARCUS, INC. SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 46.42
645.42
56171 06/10/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 47.00
56171 06/10/99 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SERVICES:MAINT.FAC. 340-199-702-5212 47.00
94.00
56172 06/10/99 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL SUNSHINE FUND 001-2170 94.71
94.71
56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 136.00
56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 340.00
56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 136.00
56173 06/10/99 000815 TEMECULA VALLEY CATHY'S TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-180-999-5330 68.00
680.00
56174 06/10/99 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM MUSEUM GIFT SHOP MERCHANDISE 190-185-999-5250 10,000.00 10,000.00
56175 06/10/99 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIG.SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 370.78 370.78
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-162-999-5263 194.50
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-170-999-5262 14.12
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 190-180-999-5263 526.32
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-161-999-5263 23.15
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-163-999-5263 292.14
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-601-5263 562.14
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-604-5263 158.96
56176 06/10/99 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED APR VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-165-999-5263 68.54
1,839.87
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 2,812.08
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 290.00
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 589,65
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 80,00
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 20.00
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 1.00
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 190.00
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 300-1020 10.00
56177 06/10/99 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 320-1020 350.00
VOUCHRE2
06/10/99 12:10
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 12
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
56177 06/10/99 000642
56178 06/10/99 003092
56178 06/10/99 003092
TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TIMBERLAKE PAINTING
TIMBERLAKE PAINTING
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
REPAIR/NAINT:SAM HICKS PARK
REPAIR/MAINT:TEM.CHAPEL
340-1020
190-180-999-5212
190-185-999-5212
5.00
450.00
770.00
4,347.73
1,220.00
56179 06/10/99 003720 TOBIN, TONY
PURCHASE MUSEUM ARTIFACTS
210-190-808-5804
56180 06/10/99 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TENNIS NET CTR.STRAPS:PALA PK 190-183-999-5320
56180 06/10/99 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 190-183-999-5320
56180 06/10/99 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. SALES TAX 190-183-999-5320
22,000.00
48.00
4.00
3.72
22,000.00
55.72
56181 06/10/9<2 003366 TORAN DEVELOPMENT & CON REPAIR 6TH ST. BOARDWALK
56181 06/10/99 0033~ TOP, AN DEVELOPMENT & CON REPAIR:6TH ST. BOARDWALK
001-164-603-5212
001-164-603-5212
4,910.25
4,995.75
9,906.00
56182 06/10/99 003680 TRAILERS USA AUTO/EQUIPMENT TRAILER:TCSD 190-180-999-5610
56182 06/10/99 003680 TRAILERS USA DOC FEE 190-180-999-5610
56182 06/10/99 003680 TPdMLERS USA SALES TAX 190-180-999-5610
2,275.00
45.00
179.80
2,499.80
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 005560 AD&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D
56185 06/10/99 003560 TRANSAMERICA 003560 AD&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AO&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRANSAMER1CA 003560 AD&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AO&D
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AO&O
56183 06/10/99 003560 TRAMSAMERICA 003560 AD&O
001-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
194-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330-2360
340-2360
132.76
3.01
23.90
.08
.23
2.44
1.34
1.49
.74
3.00
1.50
3.51
174.00
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
56184 06/10/99 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP
001-2080
165-2080
190-2080
192-2080
193-2080
194-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
8#307.07
210.23
1,619.78
2.50
33.38
25.00
85.23
96.34
643.07
158.33
11,180.93
56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RET[R
56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
56185 06/10/99 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
280-2160
320-2160
330-2160
340-2160
1,854.66
161.05
901.34
49.71
28.64
48.04
41.28
3,084.72
56186 06/10/99 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 228.59
VOUCNRE2
06/10/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56186
56186
56186
56186
56186
56186
56187
56187
56187
56187
56187
56187
56188
56189
56189
56189
56189
56189
56189
56189
56190
56191
56191
56191
56191
56191
12:10
CHECK
DATE
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/~9
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
06/10/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000524
000524
000524
000524
000524
000524
000339
002109
002109
002109
002109
002109
002109
002109
001601
000345
000345
000345
000345
000345
VENDOR
NAME
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED ~AY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA
VAN TECH ENG[NEERING/SA
VAN TECH ENGINEERING/SA
WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ
XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 U~
SAFETY VESTS/JACKETS:PW
SAFETY VESTS/JACKETS:PW
SAFETY VESTS/JACKETS:PW
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
SALES TAX
CITY HALL LEGAL PUBLICATIONS
MISC. MAINT.SUPPLIES:LAND DEV.
MISC. MAINT. SUPPL[ES:PW CREW
MEAS.~HEEL EQUIP.:TRAFF.D[V,
SALES TAX
MARKING PAINT FOR POLICE
LUMBER CRAYON FOR POLICE
SALES TAX
DEC-APR PROF,SVCS FOR E,I.R.
APR BASE CHARGE:F2OOMAJ
COPIER SUPPLIES:COPY CENTER
LEASE AGREEMENT FOR COPIER/TCC
MAY LEASE:5100 COPIER
MAY INTEREST ON LEASE:5100
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
300-2120
320-2120
330-2120
001-163-999-5242
001-163-999-5242
001-164-602-5242
001-165-999-5242
001-163-999-5242
001-164-602-5242
001-120-999-5228
001-163-999-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-602-5242
001-164-602-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-170-999-5242
001-164-602-5248
330-199-999-5239
330-199-999-5220
190-184-999-5239
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
ITEM
AMOUNT
3.76
20.00
1.54
.25
3.86
5.00
55.26
72.58
27.21
4.01
5.26
1.97
176.44
53.14
130.46
227.30
17.62
49.32
41.40
7.03
665.00
110.00
783.35
67.08
1,769.09
350.94
PAGE 13
CHECK
AMOUNT
263. O0
166.29
176.44
526.27
665.00
3,080.46
TOTAL CHECKS 378,213.35
VOUCHRE2
06/10/99
12:36
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
340 FACILITIES
AHOUNT
1,003,861.39
1,369.85
49,074.37
1,250.00
22,188.00
930,889.57
65.20
14,040.05
1,352.08
541.00
TOTAL 2,026,631.51
VOUCHRE2
06/10/99
12:36
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
ANOLINT
56194
56195
56195
56195
56195
56196
56196
56197
56197
56197
56198
56198
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
56199
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
003630 AGUILAR, GREG VILLANUEV MAY PROF ENG SVCS: CIP PRJTS 001'165-999'5248
003567 C C MYERS, INC. MAY PRGSS:OVRLD OVERCROSSING 210-165'604'5804
003567 C C MYERS, INC. RETENTION:MAY PRGSS:OVRLD/[-15 210'2035
003567 C C MYERS, INC. CREDIT:OVRCHRGED ITEM# 18 & 67 210-165-604-5804
003567 C C MYERS, INC. CREDIT:RETENTION REVERSE:MAY 210-2035
003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAR/APR SVCS:OVRLD INSPECTION 210-165-604'5801
003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR MAY INSPECTION SVCS:OVRLD DR. 210-165-604-5801
001009 D B X, INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MOOS.:R.C./MARG 001-164-602'5412
001009 D B X# INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MOOS:WINCH/JEFF 001'164-602-5412
001009 D B X, INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL:R.C./VIA LAS CO 210-165-671-5804
001924 DMG MAXIMUS MAR/APR SVCS:USER FEE STUDY 001'140-999-5248
001924 DMG MAXIMUS USER FEE STUDY TRAVEL EXPENSES 001-140-999-5248
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: NORTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: PARKS 190-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: STREETSCAPE 190-199-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: WINCHESTER CRK 190-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: SOUTH SLOPES 193-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: MEDIANS 191-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: MARG RD MEDIAN 191-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: SPORTS PRK 190-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: MARG COMM PRK 190-180-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: SR CENTER 190-181-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: CRC 190-182-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS: TCC 190-184-999-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: CITY HALL 340-199-701-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN PRK LOT 001-164-603-5415
06/22/99 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: STATION #84 001-171-999-5212
56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGESS:PALA RD BRIDGE PRJT 210-165-631-5804
56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION ITEM 72:NOT COMPLETED AS BILLE 210-165-631-5804
56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION:MAY PRGSS:PALA BRDGE 210-2035
56200 06/22/99 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION REVERSED CM 03-PALA 210-2035
8,000.00
256,022.80
25,602.28-
3,050.00'
305.00
7,740.00
11,072.50
5,070.00
8,505.00
7,264.53
10,530.00
1,514.50
8,813.00
7,806.00
106.00
1,568.00
13,375.00
1,150.00
100.00
18,578.00
1,049.00
361.00
1,444.00
193.00
541.00
250.00
400.00
360,574.45
2,842.65-
36,057.44'
284.27
8,000.00
227,675.52
18,812.50
20,839.53
12,044.50
55,734.00
321,958.63
56201 06/22/99 003676 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION-ES RELEASE RETENTION TO ESCROW 210-1035 35,773.17 35,773.17
56202 06/22/99 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH PRINTING RECREATION BROCHURES 190-180-999-5222 17,166.46 17,166.46
56203 06/22/99 002695 J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN MAY BUILDING INSPECTION SVCS 001-162-999-5118
56204 06/22/99 003631 KLEINFELDER, INC. 4/1-16 SVCS:GEOTECHNICAL OVRLD 210-165-604-5801
56204 06/22/99 003631 KLEINFELDER, INC. 4/1-16 SVCS:GEOTECHNICAL PALA 210-165-631-5801
56205 06/22/99 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI MAY SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285
56206 06/22/99 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246
56206 06/22/99 002412 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246
8,816.00
9,334.00
6,474.00
9,090.72
9,296.Z0
2,576.00
8,816.00
15,808.00
9,090.72
VOUCHRE2
06/10/99
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56206
56207
56207
56208
56208
56209
56209
56209
56210
56210
12:36
CHECK
DATE
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/Z2/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
06/22/99
VENDOR
NUMBER
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
002412
000267
000267
003599
003599
003149
003149
003149
000420
000420
VENDOR
NAME
RICHARDS, MATSON & GERS
RICHARDSw WATSON & GERS
RICHARDSo WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RXCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RXCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RZCHARDS, WATSON & GERS
RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT
RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT
T Y INTERNATIONAL
T Y INTERNATIONAL
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERP, A-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TERRA-CAL CONSTRUCTION,
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
APR 99 LEGAL SERVICES
FY 98-99 2ND QTR FIRE SERVICES
FY 98-99 4TH QTR EST.FIRE SVCS
PROFESS SERV:OVERLAND DRIVE OC
PALA RD BRIDGE:AMENDMENT 3
APR PRGS PMT#6:DUCK POND:97-17
C/O PRGS PMT#6:DUCK POND:97-17
RET.W/H PMT#6:DUCK POND:97-17
OVERLAND DR/MARG RD:ST WIDENIN
OVERLAND DR/MARG RD:ST WIDENIN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-130-999-5246
190-180-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130'999'5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
261-199-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
210-165-604-5801
210-165-604-5801
210-165-604-5801
210-165-631-5801
300-199-999-5246
280-1990
165-199-999-5246
280-1990
165-199-999-5246
001-2030
001-171-999-5251
210-165-604-5804
210-165-631-5801
210-190-143-5804
210-190-143-5804
210-2035
210-165-681-5802
210-165-681-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
6,566.29
802.91
182.40
810.00
1,202.60
36.00
215.50
39.00
433.80
65.20
18.00
1,399.58
1,293.30
347.58
610.6~
900.28
9,T32.80
1,302.00
4,307.25
67.85
465,380.59
465,380.59
5,183.85
12,410,00
277,489.55
19,002.72
29,649.23-
14,617.50
891.73
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
42,205.18
930,761.18
17,593.85
266,843.04
15,509.23
TOTAL CHECKS 2,024,631.51
ITEM 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
James B. O'Grady, Assistant City Manage~"~.~
June 22, 1999
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
Santa Ana Watershed
resolution.
That the City Council: (1) review the program being implemented by the
Project Authority (SAWPA) and (2) consider adopting the following
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALIFORNIA WATER
BOND INITIATIVE
BACKGROUND: The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and its member
agencies including Eastern Municipal Water District, Inland Empire Utility Agency, Orange County
Water District, San Bemardino Valley Municipal Water District and Western Municipal Water District
have been leaders in planning and dealing with the complex problems involved in watershed
management. Their efforts have led to significant projects involving water conservation and clean
up of contamination. SAWPA is proposing a regional program to assure a sustainable water supply
for the future, while at the same time enhancing the environment. The goal of the program is to
make the region entirely self sufficient during drought cycles, thereby firming up the regions ability
to assure a stable economy, while improving water quality, and also allowing more of the State's
scarce water resources to be allocated to wildlife and agriculture during those times.
The SAWPA Plan components include: Groundwater Storage, Contamination Removal, Habitat
Enhancement, Wetlands/Open Space, and Conservation/Flood Control/Water Efficiency. The
budget plan is estimated at $20 billion over the next twenty years. Funding requests are being
requested from Local, State and Federal funds and SAWPA is currently requesting $430 million
for the program to be included in the proposed March 2000 State Water Bond.
Eastem Municipal Water District (EMWD), Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Lee Lake Water
District, City of Norco, City of Corona, The Valley Group and County of Riverside have all
demonstrated strong support that a viable water bond be placed on the March 2000 ballot. Westem
Riverside Council of Govemments (WRCOG) and the Rancho California Water District have both
expressed they have no position on the proposed project.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE
TEMECULA SUPPORTING
INITIATIVE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOND
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, a safe, clean and reliable water supply is critical to California's economic and
environmental future; and
WHEREAS, California's dependence on imported water supplies threatens both the
economy and the environment, especially during times of drought; California should pursue new
and innovative methods to become more water self sufficient by increasing water storage and
utilizing that water during times of drought; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ("SAWPA") has developed
programs for underground water storage and environmental restoration in the Southern California
region that is home to nearly twenty-five (25%) percent of the State's population. These programs
will increase the water supply so the region will be completely self sufficient during droughts,
improve the quality and safety of the water supply, restore habitat for native species, provide flood
control, and create new wetlands and open space in the region.
WHEREAS, the California Legislature and the Governor should assure safe, clean and
reliable water is a pdority for California by placing a water bond measure on the March 2000 ballot
that provides significant funding for the SAWPA programs.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 22nd day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos\99-40 I
ITEM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Shawn Nelson, Acting City Manager
June 22, 1999
Amendment to Contract with David Turch and Associates
Aliie Kuhns, Senior Management Analys~j__.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an amendment to the contract with David
Turch and Associates which extends the contract period to June 30, 2000 for the annual contract
amount of $28,000.
BACKGROUND: During the June 23, 1998 meeting, the City Council approved an amendment to
the contract with David Turch and Associates to pursue federal funding opportunities for
infrastructure needs. This amendment was awarded in the annual amount of $28,000, plus
expenses. (Note: David Turch and Associates has not billed for any additional expenses to date
during their two-year contract period.)
Since the contract award in May, 1997, David Turch and Associates has proven to be a great asset
in obtaining over $8 Million in Federal Funding. Specific projects that have moved forward due to
their efforts include the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange, Pala Road Bridge, and Overland
Overcrossing projects.
FISCAL IMPACT:
this amendment.
Funding has been budgeted in the 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget to fund
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
TEMECULA AND DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES
THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1, 1999 by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and David Turch and Associates ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A,
On May 27, 1997 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement
entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for Consultant Services"
("Agreement").
On June 23, 1998, the First Amendment to this Agreement was approved to
extend the Agreement to terminate on June 30, 1999, and to increase the
annual amount to $28,000.
C. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
2. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
"1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1997 and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than June 30, 2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this
Agreement."
3. Section 4 of the Agreement will remain unchanged to read as follows:
"4. PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant Twenty-Eight Thousand
Dollars ($28,000) per year. Such compensation is to be paid according to the
following schedule: The first month's payment of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000)
to accompany this contract amendment. Thereafter, each month' s payment of Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000) is agreed to be due and payable, without additional notice
or demand, on or before the first day of each calendar month, beginning on August
1, 1998. The final month payment due on June 1, 1999, shall be in the amount of
Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000). Expenses: City agrees to reimburse Consultant for
all ordinary and reasonable expenses incurred on its behalf. Consultant agrees to bill
Temecula monthly for such expenses, such billing to be mailed on or before the fifth
day of each calendar month. Such expense statements are agreed to he paid by
Temecula on or before the fifteenth day of the calendar month following such
billing."
Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
Susan W. Jones, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
BY:
NAME:
TITLE:
ITEM 6
APPROVA~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINA
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manage~City Council
t.~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
City Council Chamber- Facility Use Policy
PREPARED BY:
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Facility Use Policy for the use of
the City Council Chambers.
DISCUSSION: Occasionally, requests are made to reserve the Council Chambers
by various community groups and organizations within the City. Therefore, staff has developed the
attached formal policy to identify the procedures, costs, and responsibilities associated with the use
of the City Council Chambers.
The Council Chamber's primary purpose is to provide a formal location for meetings held by the
City Council. When the Chamber is not in use by the Council, the Chamber may be used by City
Commissions, Advisory Committees, City staff conducting City business, other governmental
agencies, as well as limited usage by local non-profit service clubs that benefit City of Temecula
residents. All facility use approvals will be granted based upon the five (5) priority groupings
established within this policy.
The procedure to reserve the use of the City Council Chamber is consistent with the procedure to
reserve any existing City facility. The Community Services Department will manage reservation
requests to ensure there are no scheduling conflicts, as well as to provide support as needed.
Reservations must be made Monday through Fdday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Groups or organizations
requesting the use of the facility must complete a facility use form and service order request form
to ensure that staff is aware of the intended use and set-up the facility appropriately. Other than
governmental uses, all other user groups and organizations would be required to pay facility rental
fees, associated staff costs and provide the City with $1,000,000 General Liability Insurance
naming the City of Temecula as additional insured. The fee for renting the City Council Chambers
would be consistent with the fees outlined in Resolution No. 93-97 for use of a large multi-purpose
room.
R:~lGLERG~,GENDAS~ChamberReservations.1 .doc
Currently the rate for non-profit uses is $25 for the first 3 hours, $7 for each hour thereafter.
Groups for-profit will not be allowed. The Community Services Department would also require a
cleaning security deposit in the amount of $100. Should additional equipment be requested,
appropriate staffing and staff costs would also have to be paid by the renter(s).
Many reservations will be accepted on a first-come, first served basis. Groups or organizations
with a lower priority may be "bumped" from the calendar if groups with a higher priority request the
use of the Council Chamber and sufficient accommodations can not be found elsewhere. In such
cases, displaced groups/organizations may request the use of other City facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT: To date, formal requests for use of the Council Chambers have been
minimal. Although we are uncertain at this time to the amount of fees that will be generated, all
fees collected will be deposited into the Indoor Rentals account # 190-183-4990.
ATTACHMENTS: Policy and Resolution No. 93-97.
R:%ZIGLERG~AGENDAS%ChamberReservations.1 .doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER FACILITY USE POLICY
Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is to identify the procedures, costs, and responsibilities
associated with the use of the City's Council Chambers.
Policy:
Use of City Council Chamber:
The purpose of the Council Chamber is to provide a formal location for
meetings held by the City Council. Use of the City Council Chambers is
limited to official activities of the City of Temecula, events sponsored or co-
sponsored by the City, events that are official activities of another
governmental agency and local non-profit service clubs.
Capacity of Council Chamber:
Capacity of the Chamber (lecture style) is 140.
Priority of Groups Using Council Chamber:
Priority of groups/organizations desiring to utilize the City Council Chambers
will be based upon the following:
Priority GrouD - 1:
Reserved for City Council meetings.
Priority Group - 2:
Reserved for meetings of City Commissions and Advisory
Committees.
Priority Group - 3:
Includes all City Departments that request the Council Chamber on an
as-needed basis for meetings, training sessions, testing, etc. Also,
included in this category are events that are sponsored or hosted by
the City.
Priority Group - 4:
Includes all Federal, State, County, and City governmental and related
agencies (i.e. school districts) using the Council Chamber to provide
programs that benefit the City or the community.
Priority Group - 5:
Includes local (Temecula based) non-profit service clubs (i.e. Woman's
Club, Kiwanis, Rotary Club, Lions Club and League of Women's
Voters) conducting events that benefit City of Temecula residents.
R:~PARKERHD\Council Chambers.doc
Fee to Use Council Chamber:
There will be no fee for to utilize the Council Chamber for Priority
Groups 1-4. In the event that a Priority Group 5 is granted approval
by the City Manager or his designee to utilize the Council Chamber,
all fees identified for a large multi-purpose facility as identified in the
current fee schedule, and appropriate staffing fees apply. In such
cases, all fees must be paid to the City of Temecula in the
Community Services Department at the time the reservation is made.
Room Fee:
Charges for the use of the City Council Chamber are listed in the
City's Fee Resolution No. 93-97. Please see fee schedule for current
charges.
Cleaning Security Deposit:
A cleaning security deposit in the amount of $100.00 may be
charged for Priority Group 5 organizations. This deposit will be
returned to the group/organization within two weeks of the scheduled
program should the Council Chamber be left in the condition in which
it was received.
Insurance Requirements:
All Priority Group 5 organizations desiring to use the Council Chamber
must have $1,000,000 general liability coverage per occurrence
which names the City of Temecula as additionally insured.
Groups/organizations which do not have insurance may purchase
special events insurance through the Finance Department if
necessBry.
In addition, all groups/organizations must identify and hold the City of
Temecula harmless from any and all losses and claims. The
Community Services Department must receive all insurance
requirements and necessary forms no later than 72 hours prior to the
scheduled program.
Staff Support:
Any Council Chamber user group/organization (including co-sponsors)
requesting staff support will be charged as appropriate. This includes
but, is not limited to set-up and takes down of tables and chairs and
other special requirements (i.e. extra janitorial services, extra staff
assistance, audio/visual staff, etc.)
Overtime Personnel:
All groups requesting use of the Council Chamber when a staff
member is unavailable to be in attendance for the duration of the
event must pay for overtime personnel.
R:\PARKERHD\COunCil Charnbers.doc
Reservation Procedure
Use of the Council Chamber for appropriate functions will be
scheduled on a priority basis (as defined in this policy). Many
reservations will be accepted on a first-come, first served basis.
Groups/organizations with lower priority may be "bumped" from the
calendar if groups with higher priority request the use of the Council
Chamber and sufficient accommodations can not be found elsewhere.
In such cases, displaced groups/organizations may request the use of
other City facilities. If no accommodations can be made, the City will
assume no liability for displacing such groups/organizations and will
refund any fees paid. All reservations for use of the Council Chamber
must be made through the Community Services Department Monday
through Friday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The Community Services
Department in accordance with this policy will resolve any reservation
and priority conflicts.
· Advanced Reservations:
Reservations may be made up to six months in advance.
· Room Set-Up:
Tables and chairs will be set-up in advance by City personnel. A
Service Order Request from the Maintenance Division must be
submitted to the Community Services Department at the time of
reservation. Visual aid equipment may be provided as needed with
payment of appropriate fees. All requests for audio/visual
equipment must be made at the time of reservation.
· Cancellations:
The Community Services Department must be notified as soon as
possible of any cancellations. A minimum of seventy-two hour
prior notice is required. This will enable staff support to be re-
assigned and the Council Chamber is made available for use.
Failure to notify the Community Services Department of
cancellations at least seventy-two hours in advance will result in
the forfeiture of the room use fee (if appropriate), or in a charge-
back to the canceling department for staff support time.
Use Conditions and Limitations:
Groups desiring to utilize the
following regulations:
Council Chamber must comply with the
No Smoking:
Smoking is not allowed in the Council Chamber.
Food and Beverages:
Food and beverages are allowed in the Council Chamber.
However, care should be taken to ensure no damage is done to
the facilities. Alcohol shall not be served in the Council Chamber.
Exceptions to this policy may be approved in writing by the City
Manager, provided the event takes place outside of normal
business hours.
R:\PARKERHD\Council Chambers.doc
· Clean-Up/Security Deposit:
Groups/organizations using the Council Chamber are responsible
for returning the room to its original condition. Tables, chairs, etc.
should be returned to their original positions. Food, beverages,
papers, etc. should be removed or deposited in wastebaskets.
Electrical equipment is to be turned off. Groups/organizations that
damage or fail to clean the Council Chamber shall forfeit the
required cleaning security deposit. If no cleaning security deposit
was charged, groups/organizations will be billed for any damages
or extra cleaning costs resulting from their use.
· Entry Fees:
Entry fees may not be charged by any group/organization using
the Council Chamber.
"Right of Refusal"
The City of Temecula reserves the right and is under no obligation to allow
any group/organization that falls outside the definitions herein to use the
Council Chamber.
Other Restrictions
· No activities are permitted that violate local, state, or federal laws. Use
must comply with all city codes and policies.
· Use must not disrupt normal operations and functions of the City.
· Commercial activities are not permitted.
· No pets are permitted in the chambers except for seeing-eye or other
animals required due to physical limitations of attendees.
· Official functions of the City of Temecula shall take priority in scheduling
the facility.
· All scheduling requests shall be directed to the Community Services
Department.
R:\PARKERHD\Council Chambers.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 93-97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE
OF CITY PARKS
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to provide public access to indoor and
outdoor city recreation facilities and to Special Use Park sites and recreation facilities; and
WHEREAS, to help defray costs associated with providing the required staffing,
utility costs, maintenance, and other services at such facilities, it is necessary to establish
fees to reimburse the City for its operational expenses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of ~he City of Temecula may establish by Resolution a
Fee Schedule for the use of City parks;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
resolve, determine, and order as follows:
Section 1: The revised fee schedule for Indoor Facility Use, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted.
Section 2: The fee schedule for Outdoor Facility Use, attached hereto as Exhibit "B"
is hereby adopted.
Section 3: The fee schedule for Special Use Park sites, attached hereto as Exhibit
"C" is hereby adopted.
Section 4: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption' of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of November, 1993.
J.
ATTEST:
[SEAL]
5~sos~93-97
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECLILA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of Temecula DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Resolution
No. 93-97 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of November, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone
Mufioz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COIfNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
S.'G i k
5h'e. sos\93-97
City of Temecula
Community Services Department
I. Indoor Use
Indoor Reserved Use:
1. All reserved use of' public recreational facilities requires review and
approval of a "Facility Request Form" by City staff. Facility Request Forms may be obtained
at Temecula City Hall, located at 43174 Business Park Drive. Requests must be submitted at
least seven (7) working days prior to the intended use and all appropriate fees must be paid at
the time of the request. '
2. Facility Use Permits shall be issued only to responsible adults, age 21
years or older, who must comply with all rules and regulations. Such person is responsible for
payment of all applicable charges and must be present at the function for which use is
authorized.
3. A refundable cleaning deposit of $100 may be required with the completed
request and applicable fees, depending upon the use of indoor facilities. Upon receipt, the
facility win be reserved for the applicant pending it's availability and review by City slaff. The
deposit will be returned if the facility is found to be in a condition similar to it being found
immediately before the activity. The applicant may expect the returned deposit, or an
appropriate portion thereof, within twenty (20) working days after the scheduled event. Should
repairs to the facility be necessary that exceed the funds deposited, the City will hold the
applicant financially responsible for such repairs.
4. No facility shall be scheduled more than six (6) months in advance.
5. Facilities are provided "as is" with limited support items. A preview of
the facility will be encouraged before a request is submitted to ensure facilities meet applicant's
needs.
6. A $5.00 processing fee will be levied by the City if an applicant cancels
reservations within five (5') days of the event.
7. Until the required Facility Request Form, cleaning deposit, rental fees,
required insurance, and other requirements are received by the City, the City shall have the right
to cancel the applicants request. All required insurance verifications must be submitted at least
seventy-two (72) hours prior to the use of the facility.
R:~d~os~195 a
8. The City retains the right to deny any building utilization request that is
inconsistent with the goals and policies of the City Council of the City of Temecula, Community
Services Department.
9. The applicant is responsible for all set-up and clean-up. Necessary clean-
up not performed by user will be conducted by the City and applicable costs will be assessed to
the user's cleaning deposit.
10. All use is restricted to the day of rental. A facility will not be available. _.
for set-up the day before, or clean-up 'the day after use without additional fees.
11. User must comply with instructions of City employee(s) on duty or risk
immediate eviction from public premises. All noise, music amplification, etc. must be kept at
a reasonable sound level as determined by security or the staff person on duty. The City staff
member may cancel a function at any time if persons involved in the function are not conducting
themselves in a lawful manner and/or are causing damage to City property. The authorized
applicant is responsible for the supervision and actions of those in attendance.
12. The City is not responsible for any lost or stolen articles.
13. No City equipment or furnishings shall be removed from the premises.
14. Decorations must be approved prior to instaJ]ation and must be removed
immediately after event. All decorations must be of a flameproof material. No nails, tacks,
tape or other materials considered harmful or defacing to building is permitted.
15. The City may require security personnel at applicant's expense on
'functions deemed necessary or in the best interest of the City.
16. All admission fees charged by the applicant require City approval.
Additional permits or licenses may be required.
P~:~sos~9~ 4
CRy of Temecula
Community Services Department -
Fee Schedule
INDOOR FACILITY USE
GROUP I
TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and recreational activities.
FACILITY:
K1T~
SMALL MEETING ROOM '
LARGE MEETING ROOM
SMALL- MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
GYMNASIUM
AMPHITHEATER
SMALL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS)
LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS)
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
No Charge
R:~e~e~t~.9S 5
City of Temecula
Community Services Department
Fee Schedule
INDOOR FACILITY USE
GROUP II
Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented sports activities, and non-profit
athletic/civic organizations conducting commum'ty oriented leisure or sports activities.
FACmrrY:
K1TCI-m-N $ 5.00/3 Hour Min. $ 3.0 0 e a.
- add'l. hour
SMALL MEETING ROOM
LARGE MEETING ROOM
$ !0.00/3 Hour Min. $5.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$15.00/3 HourMin. $6.00 ca.
add'l. hour
SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
LARGE MUlTI-PURPOSE ROOM
$ 20.00/3 Hour Min.
$ 25.00/3 Hour Min.
$6.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$7.00 ca.
add'l. hour
GIqVINASILrlVi
$ 20.00/3 Hour Min.
$5.00 ca.
add'l. hour
AMPi-U'rHEATER:
No Entry Fee
Entry Fee
$ 20.0013 Hour Min.
$ 75.00/3 Hour Min.
$5.00 ca. add'l.
hour
$20.00 ~ add'L
hour
SMATL PICNIC
(49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS)
LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS)
$15.00/4 Hour Min.
$ 25.00/4 Hour MAn.
$5.00 ea. add'l.
hour
$6.00 ca. add'l.
hour
FACILITY:
KITCHEN'
City of Temecula
Community Services Department
Fee Schedule
INDOOR FACILITY USE
GROUP fly
Base standard rate for community users on a non-profit basis.
SMALL MI::~F-TING ROOM
LARGE MEETING ROOM
Minimum 3 Hour Use
$10.00/3 Hour MAn.
$ 25.00/3 Hour Min.
$ 30.00/3 Hour Min.
SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
LARGE MIJLTI-PURPOSE ROOM
$ 75.00/3 Hour Min.
$ 90.00~3 Hour Min.
GYMNAS~
$100.00/3 Hour Min.
AMPHI'fI-I~ATER:
No Entry Fee
$100.00/3 Hour Min.
SM~ r ,T , PICNIC
(49 PARTXCIPANTS OR LESS)
$ 30.00/4 Hour MAn.
$7.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$8.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$10.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$15.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$20.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$20.00 ea.
add'l. hour
hour
LARGE PICNIC
(50-100 PARTICIPANTS)
$ 50.00/4 Hour Min.
$12.00 ca. ndd'L
hour
City of Temecula
Community Services Department
Fee Schedule
INDOOR FACILITY USE
GROUP IV
Profit making, commercial businesses or non-resident individuals and organizations
conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public.
FACILITY:
KITCHEN
SMALL MF-F. TING ROOM
LARGE MEETING ROOM
SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
GYMNASIUM
A_MPHifH. EATER:
No Entry Fe~
Entry
-$ 40.00/3 Hour Min.
$ 50.0013 Hour Min,
$ 60,00/3 Hour Min.
$150.00/3 Hour Min.
$180.00/3 Hour Min.
$200.00/3 Hour Min.
$200,00/3 Hour Min,
$375,00/3 Hour Min,
$10.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$16.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$20.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$30.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$40.00 ea,
add'l, hour
$40.00 ea.
add'l. hour
$4O.0O ea, addl
hour'
$45.00 ea. add'L
hour
SMALL PICNIC
(49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS)
LARGE PICNIC
(S0-100 PARTt.CrPANTS)
$ 60.0O/4 Hour MAn.
$10O.0O/4 Hour Min.
$20.00 ea. add'L
hour
$24.00 ea. add'L
R~31~ 8
EXHIBIT "B"
City of Temecula
Community Services Department
Fee Schedule
OUTDOOR FACH/rY USE
Fee Payment:
The fees applicable to the use of facilities are contained herein and are due
and payable at the TCSD office (72). hours prior to the use of that facility.
11. Outdoor Use
GROUP
Softball/Baseball Field*
No Field Preparation
No Lights
Lighted
0 0 0 12.00
0 5.00 12.00 20.00
e
Soccer/Football Field*
No Field Preparation
No Lights
Lighted
0 0 0 12.00
0 5.00 12.00 20.00
.3.
Toumamemts/Sports Clinics
(per field per day)
No Field Preparation
0 0. 75.00 150.00
4. A $5.00 Administrative fee will be charged for processing refunds!
Individuals who do not reside within the boundaries of the City of Temecula
registering for a TCSD sponsored activity or facility will be subject to a $10.00
per person non-residency fee.
Fees listed herein are on an hourly basis per group, per field unless otherwise
- R:~-~o~?.95 9
Payment for Special Use Parks
A. All fees and deposits must be submitted to the City of Temecula prior to the user
group's event. Should the user group fail to submit all required payments and insurance, the
City reserves the right to cancel the reservation or event.
B. Contracts of $2,500.00 or more require a 30% non-refundable deposit due ten (10)
working days from the date the contract is issued. The fun balance is due and must be paid
thirty (30) days prior to the event.
Contracts of less than $2,500.00 require a 50% non-refundable deposit due ten (10)
working days from the date the contract is issued. The full balance is due and must be paid
thirty (30) calendar days prior to the event.
C. The terms "set-up' or "tear don" shall include the use of the facility for moving
in and out equipment, and preparation of the facility for performance of an event or activity.
The charge for these periods is 15 % of the daily rental cost of the facility per day. This fee
may be adjusted for Group Two user Groups.
D. The charge for use of the facility shall apply to the periods of occupancy of the
facility between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. No event shall be permitted to
continue after 12:00 midnight unless agreed in writing and approved by the Director of
Community Services.
E. All rental requests require a security deposit of 25 % of the one day facility rental
fee to ensure the facility and equipment arc left in good condition. Security deposits axe a
guarantee against loss, damage or maintenance required to restore the facility to the condition
it was prior to the event. The user group is responsible for all clean-up, and failure to comply
will result in the forfeiture of the deposit.
F. A $25.00 fee will be charged on any check returned to the City for any reason.
The in~vidual or organization shall then be required to pay all rental fees and deposits by cash,
cashiers check or money order.
G. All costs deemed necessary and incurred by the City on behalf of a user group
will be billed.
it:~,wsos%29~ 10
City of Tem'ecuh
Community Services Department
Fee Schedule
Special Use Park Sites
Group I
TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and recreational activities
6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight No Charge
Group II
Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic
organizations conducting community oriented leisure or sports activities.
6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight
$375.00 per day and any fees
negotiated by con .tnct.
Group
Base standard rate for community users on a non-profit basis.
6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight
$525.00 p~ day and any fees
negotiated by contract
Group IV
Profit runErig, commercial business or non-resident individuals and organizations conducting
activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public.
6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight
$900.00 per day and any fees
negotiated by contract:
P,:~.sos~,95 11
ITEM 7
APPRO\~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
Resolution Adopting FY 1999/2000 Solid Waste Rates
PREPARED BY:
Todd Holmes, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR FISCAL
YEAR 199912000
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the existing solid waste franchise agreement with C R & R
Incorporated the rates charged for refuse and recycling services in the City of Temecula are
subject to annual review and modification. The franchise agreement provides for adjustments
based upon changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Riverside County landfill tipping
fees. The CPI increase as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics
is 1.4%. The County of Riverside Waste Resources Management District has determined that
there will be no tipping fee increase in FY 1999/2000 at county landfills.
The solid waste rates for fiscal year 1999/2000 reflect the 1.4% CPI increase and no change
in the tipping fee. The single family residential rate for the current year, 1998/99 is $170.64;
the new rate for 1999/2000 will be $172.56. This represents an annual increase of $1.92 per
single family residence. The TCSD Board of Directors reviewed the single family residential
refuse and recycling collection rate on May 25, 1999 as a part of the proposed TCSD Rates and
Charges for FY 1999/2000.
The current rates and charges for solid waste services have been disclosed to the property
owners and residents of the proposed annexation areas of Redhawk and Vail Ranch. If the
annexation is approved by the voters, the annexation would become effective July 1, 2000.
The rate and charge for solid waste services for FY 2000/01 will be determined in the same
manner as this year's increase and the annexation area would be subject to the same rates and
charges as the rest of the City.
The attached Exhibit "D" reflects the new rates for solid waste collection for all collection
services to become effective July 1, 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fee adjustments represent appropriate collection rates based on
provisions in the solid waste franchise agreement. The franchised waste hauler will begin
collecting the new fees as of July 1, 1999. No additional costs will be borne by the City of
Temecula since these services are paid for directly by the customers receiving the services.
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit "D"
U.S. Department of Labor, Consumer Price Index
r:\c~gendas\98swratea.~
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TI~IECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
declare that:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does fred, determine and
a. The City of Temecula (the "City") and CR & R Incorporated ( the
"Grantee") entered into an exclusive franchise agreement on May 28, 1991 for the collection,
transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for
providing temporary bin/rolloff services in the City.
b. The franchise agreement provides for periodic rate adjustments
based on certain predefined criteria, specifically annual Consumer Price Index Ccpr')
adjustments and landf'tll tipping fee adjustments.
c. The franchise agreement further provides a formula to calculate the
fee adjustments to be made to the agreement on an annual basis.
d. The CPI adjustment is 1.4% for fiscal year 1999/2000.
e. There is no tipping fee adjustment for fiscal year 1999/2000.
f. The franchise agreement provides that the solid waste fee
adjustments are to be adopted by the City Council by Resolution
Section 2. That the City of Temecula approves the solid waste fee adjustments
as shown in Exhibit "D" for fiscal year 1999/2000.
Section 3.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the
Resolution.
p:\msep\98nttesw.rso
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOlYFFX), by the City Council of the
City of Temecula this __ day of , 1999.
ATTF_ST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNI~ OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECLRA )
8S
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __ day of , 1999, by the
following vote:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CO~CItMEMBERS:
p:\ruaep\98rate~w.rao
CR&R
SOLID WASTE
MANA EMENT
DIV SION
1706 GOETZ ROAD
PERRIS, CA 92570
P. O. BOX 1208
PERRIS, CA 92572
FAX 909-657-5493
909-943-1991
March 23, 1999
Ms. Phyllis Ruse
Deputy Director
Community Services Departmere
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Re: Annual Consumer Price Index Increase
Dear Phyllis:
As provided for in the contract between the City of Temecula and CR&R Incorporated, the rates
illustrated in Exhibit "D" shall be adjusted annually to reflect the change in the Consumer Price
Index (CPI).
In reviewing the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for January 1998 through December 1998, the
CPI increased by 1.4%. Per our agreement with the County of Riverside Waste Resources Management
District, they can only increase our tipping fee by the change in CPI. However, they have elected based
on last years expenditures to not increase the rate per ton.
Based on the aforementioned, I have prepared the methodology as prescribed in the contract to pass
these increased costs through. I have also prepared a new Exhibit "D" to reflect the incremental
increases that will become effective July 1, 1999.
Please review the attached and advise me if a meeting is desired or the rates as prepared are consistent
with the contract.
SDi~o~b
President
attachments
,
CITY of TEMECULA
Exhibit "D"
Schedule of Rates
(effective July 1, 1999)
Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer, and
disposal grantee billing
Monthly Rate: $ 14.38
Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting~ transfer, and
disposal parcel charge '
Monthly Rate: $ 14.38
Mechanized single family detached residential additional refuse, composting, and recycling
container - grantee billing
Monthly Rate: $ 5.47
Single family detached residential additional bulky item pick up - grantee billing
Pick Up Rate: $ 6.61
Commercial. industrial, and multi-family residential refuse monthly bin rates ( one 2 cubic
yard bin) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
2 x week
3 x week
4 :~. week
5 x week
6 x week
7 x week
$ 64.82
$ 129.64
$ 194.46
$ 259.28
$ 324.10
$ 388.92
$ 453.74
Compacted 2 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate
Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential refuse monthly bin rates (one 3 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week $ 74.96
2 x week $ 149.92
3 x week $ 224.88
4 x week $ 299.84
5 x week $ 374.80
6 x week $ 449.76
7 x week $ 524.72
Compacted 3 Cubic Yard monthly: 2.5 x monthly rate
Commercial, industrial, and multi-Family residential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 3 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week $ 34.02
2 x week $ 68.04
3 x week $ 102.06
4 x week $ 136.08
5 x week $ 170.10
6 x week $ 204.12
7 x week $ 238.14
Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential refuse
bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
2 x week
3 x week
4 x week
5 x week
6 x week
'7 x week.
monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic yard
$ 85.13
$ 170.26
$ 255.39
$ 340.52
$ 425.65
5''~
$ 595.91
Compacted 4 Cubic Yard monthly rote: 2.5 x monthly rate
Commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week $ 45.06
2 x week $ 90.12
3 x week $ 135.18
4 x week $ 180.24
5 x week $ 225.30
6 x week $ 270.36
7 x week $ 315.42
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.'
16,
17.
18.
19.
20.
Temporary 3 cubic yard bin rate:
Extra 3 cubic yard pick up:
Redeliver and reinstatement rate:
Roll-off disposal rate:
Roll-off recycling rate:
Roll-off compactor rate:
Roll-off recycling compactor rate."
"Hard to service" vehicle usage rate:
"Hard to service" bin moving rate:
Special bin lids (locking/CBL) rate:
Deodorizing / replacing bin rate:
$ 65.58
$ 34.00
$ 28.20
$150.82 + landfill/recycle fee
$150.82 minus market value
$ 301.64 + landfill/recycle fee
$ 301.64 minus market value
no charge
no charge
no charge
no charge
CITY OF TEMECULA
Methodology
The below methodology to pass through the CPI increase has been extracted from Exhibit "D", Section
21.
Schedule of Rates
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
CPI: $14.22 per month x 78% x 1.4% CPI = $.16
Same as Number # 1
CPI: $5.41 per month x 78% x 1.4% CPI = $.06
CPI: $6.54 per month x 78% x 1.4% CPI = $.07
CPI: $64.18 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.64
CPI: $74.22 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.74
CPI: $33.69 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.33
CPI: $84.29 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.84
CPI: $44.59 per month x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.47
CPI: $64.93 per load x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.65
CPI: $33.63 per pick up x 71.5% x 1.4% CPI = $.37
CPI: $27.92 per occtk,'rence x 71.5% x ! .4% CP_~ = $.28
CPI: $148.74 per load x 1.4% CPI = $2.08
Same as Number #13
CPI: $297.48 per load x 1.4% CPI = $4.16
Same as Number #15
Total Increase:$. 16 per mo.
Total Increase: $.06 per mo.
Total Increase:$.07 per mo.
Total Increase:$.64 per too.
Total Increase: $.74 per mo.
· Total Increase:$.33 per mo.
Total Increase:$.84 per mo.
Total Increase: $.47 per mo.
Total Increase: $.65 per load
Total Increase:$.37 per p/u
Total !ncrease:$.28 per occ.
Total Increase:S2.08 per load
Total Increase:S4.16 per load
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS (415) 975-4567 04-26-99 10:46a Page 02
ITEM 8
APPROr~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO-'
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
~rlerman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
SUBJECT:
Cable Television Franchise Transfer
PREPARED BY: Todd Holmes, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF
A CABLE TELEVSION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BY TCI
CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., TO CENTURY-TCI
CALIFORNIA, L.P.
DISCUSSION: The City has a franchise agreement with TCI Cablevision of California, Inc.
(TCI) to provide cable television to the citizens of Temecula. On November 18, 1998, TCI
entered into an agreement with Century Communications Corp. (Century) to create a new
limited partnership between the two corporations. This partnership will be known as Century-
TCI California, L.P. (Century-TCI). Century has a 75% interest in the new partnership, and TCI
has a 25% interest. Pursuant to both Federal law and local ordinance, this transaction requires
City approval. Accordingly, TCI and Century have submitted an FCC Form 394, which is an
application for franchise authority consent to assignment or transfer of control of the cable
television franchise. This form was filed with the City on February 16, 1999. A copy of the
transfer application package is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
TCI was originally granted its franchise on the basis of its financial, legal and technical ability
to operate the cable system. The purpose of City consent to the transfer is to insure that: (I)
Century-TCI has the legal, financial and technical ability to operate the system; (ii) TCI is
presently in full compliance with the terms of the franchise; and (iii) the financial terms of the
agreement will not negatively impact cable operations. If these criteria are met, the City may
not disapprove the transfer. The City Attorney's office has extensively reviewed the application
and supporting material. No negative information was disclosed during the review that would
preclude the City Council from making the findings that Century-TCI, as the proposed
transferee, has the "financial, technical and legal qualifications" to ensure the performance of
all of the obligations required under the existing cable television franchise agreement. The
transfer will not change the termination date of the franchise, which will remain January 9,
2004. No change in the cable rates has been proposed in conjunction with this transfer.
Pursuant to Federal regulation, the City has 120 days to approve or disapprove the transfer.
However, if the City takes no action within the time limit, the application is "deemed approved"
and the transfer may proceed. By formally authorizing the transfer, the City may recover the
costs incurred in processing and evaluating the proposed transfer of the franchise. The time
limit for City action on the transfer has been extended by mutual agreement. The extension
allowed the City and Century-TCI additional time to finalize the details of the transfer.
Century-TCI is a new entity with no "track record" related to the ownership and operation of
cable television franchises. Consequently, the City Attorney requested that Century-TCI provide
a guarantee of performance. The Assignment and Assumption Agreement that is attached as
Exhibit A to the resolution requires that a guarantee of the new limited partnership's
performance of its cable franchise obligations be provided by Century Communications Corp.
This guarantee is set forth in Schedule 1 to Exhibit A.
Prior to the filing of the transfer application, TCI was acquired by AT&T. That acquisition was
considered a transfer of control of TCI, rather than a transfer of the actual franchise. Under
the terms of the City's franchise agreement, and franchise ordinance, a transfer of control does
not require City approval. Adelphia Communications has recently announced its intention to
acquire Century Communications. This action is also considered to be a transfer of control and
will not require City approval. Following Adelphia's acquisition of Century's capital stock,
Century-TCI will continue as the Franchisee.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City will be reimbursed for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred
in processing and evaluating the proposed transfer and assignment of the franchise, provided
that those costs do not exceed ~2,500.
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit "A"
Schedule "1"
RESOLUTION NO. 9~.._.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT AND
TRANSFER OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT BY TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,
TO CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA, LP.
WHEREAS, TCI Cablevision of Califomia, Inc., a Califomia Corporation ("Franchise"),
is the duly authorized holder of a franchise ("Franchise") that authorizes the construction,
operation, and maintenance of a cable television system within the City of Temecula ("Franchise
Authority");
WHEREAS, On February 16, 1999, the Franchise Authority received from the
Franchisee and from Cantury-TCI California, L.P. (Transferee"), an application for the
assignment and transfer of the existing Franchise, which application included FCC Form 394
entitled 'Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of
Cable Television Franchise." Supplemental information was provided to the Franchise Authority
by the Franchisee and the Transferee on Apdl 16, 1999;
WHEREAS, In accordance with Section 5.12.080 of Chapter 5.12 of Title 5 of the
Temecula Municipal Code, the Franchise Authority has the dght to review and to approve the
r~ancial, technical, and legal qualifications of the Transferee in connection with the proposed
assignment and transfer of the Franchise;
WHEREAS, The staff of the Franchise Authority has reviewed the documentation that
accompanied FCC Form 394 end, based upon the representations set forth in that
documentation, has concluded that the proposed Transferee has the requisite financial,
technical, and legal qualifications to adequately perform, or to ensure the performance of, all
obligations required of the Franchise under the Franchise, and that the Transferee will be bound
by all existing terms, conditions, and obligations under the Franchise previously granted by the
Franchise Authority to the Franchisee.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. In accordance with Section 5.12.080 of Chapter 5.12 of Title 5 of the
Temecula Municipal Code, the Franchise Authority consents to and approves the proposed
assignment and transfer of the Franchise by TCI Cablevision of California, Inc. to Century-TCI
Califomia, L.P., including such intermediate transfers as may be required to effectuate that
ultimate assignment and transfer.
Section 2. The authorization, consent and approval of the Franchise Authority to the
porposed assignment and transfer is conditioned upon compliance by the Franchise or the
Transferee with the following requirements, as to which they are jointly and severally
responsible:
A. The Franchisee and the Transferee will execute and file in the office of the City
Clerk as "Assignment and Assumption Agreement" in substantially the form attached to this
resolution as Exhibit A. The Mayor is authorized to execute that document and thereby
Reso~9- I
evidence the written consent of the Franchise Authority to the assignment and assumption of all
dghts and obligations under the Franchise.
B. An odginai or conformed copy of the written instrument evidendng the closing
and consummation of the proposed transfer and assignment of the Franchise must be filed in
the off.me of the City Clerk within 30 days after that dosing and consummation.
C. The Franchise Authority will be reimbursed for all costs and expenses reasonably
incurred by the Franchise Authority in processing and evaluating the information relating to the
proposed transfer and assignment of the Franchise; provided, however, that those costs and
expenses will not exceed the sum of $2500 and will be set forth in an itemized statement
transmitted by the City Manager, or the City Managers clesignee, to the Franchisee and the
Tmnsferee within 30 days after the effective date of this Resolution.
Section 3. Nothing contained in this Resolution may be construed to extend the term of
the Franchise, which will terminate in its entirety on January 9, 2004.
Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the
following persons:
Clifford A. Bail, Esq.
Century-TCI Califomia, L.P.
do Century Comrnunicetions Corp.
50 Locust Avenue
New Canaan, Connecticut 06840
Ms. Kathy Ouillette
TCI Cablevision of California, Inc.
4077 West Stetson Avenue
Hemet, Califomia 92545
Section 5. The City Clerk is directed to certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City
of Temecula this 22"d day of June, 1999.
A~E~:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Re~o~g9- 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular ~ting thereof held on the 22~ day of June, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
AND
GUARANTEE OF ASSIGNEE' S OBLIGATIONS
(CABLE TELEVISION FR3~NCHISE AGREEMENT)
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement")
is made and entered into this day of , 1999,
by and between TCI Cablevision of California, Inc., a California
corporation ("Assignor"), Century-TCI California, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership, ("Assignee"), and the City of
Temecula, a California municipal corporation ("Franchise
Authority").
RECITALS:
A. Assignor is the authorized holder of a franchise
that authorizes the construction, operation, and maintenance of a
cable television system within the City of Temecula, California.
Assignor's nonexclusive cable television franchise will expire by
its terms on January 9, 2004.
B. Subject to the prior consent of the Franchise
Authority, Assignor desires to assign and transfer to Assignee,
and Assignee desires to assume, all rights, duties, and
obligations under that certain cable television franchise
agreement between the Franchise Authority and the Assignor that
became effective on January 10, 1989, and was thereafter assigned
("Franchise Agreement").
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Assignor assigns and transfers to Assignee all of
Assignor's rights, duties, and obligations under the Franchise
Agreement.
2. Assignee covenants and agrees with Assignor and
with the Franchise Authority to assume all rights and to assume
and perform all duties and obligations of the Assignor under the
Franchise Agreement.
3. Franchise Authority consents to the assignment and
transfer by Assignor to Assignee of all rights, duties, and
obligations specified in the Franchise Agreement, contigent upon
the execution by Century Communications Corp., as guarantor, of
the "Guarantee of Assignee's Obligations" that is attached as
Schedule 1 to this Agreement.
990526 11086-00068 syc 0594015 2
TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused
this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be executed by their
duly authorized representatives as of the date set forth below
the authorized signature.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
"ASSIGNOR"
TCI Cablevision of California,
Inc.
By:
(authorized corporate officer)
Title:
Date:
Legal Counsel
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Legal Counsel
"ASS IGNEE"
Century-TCI California, L.P.
By: Century Exchange LLC,
General Partner
By: Century Southwest Cable
Television, Inc.,
Managing Member
By:
(Authorized Officer)
Title:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
"FRANCHISE AUTHORITY"
CITY OF TEMECULA
Mayor
Date:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
990526 11086-00068 syc 0594015 2 A - 2
SCHEDULE 1
to
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
GUARANTEE OF ASSIGNEE'S OBLIGATIONS
In consideration for the Franchise Authority's consent
to the assignment and transfer of the Franchise Agreement that is
referenced in this Agreement, the undersigned entity
unconditionally guarantees the performance by Assignee of its
obligations under that Franchise Agreement.
"GUARANTOR,,
Century Communications Corp., a
Texas corporation
By:
(Authorized Corporate Officer)
Title:
Date:
990526 11086-00068 syc 0594015
WlJJAM I, IqUOIL~
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
A1TORNE'Y'S AT LAW
RICHARD RICHARO S
(191e-lgB,B)
THIRTY-EIGHTH FLCK)R
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 9,0071-14.89
(213} 1214414
FACSIMILE (213) 121-0078
WILL.IAMK. 1,0:INVlER
OUR RLE NUMBER
99904-00059
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: SOME PRACTICE TIPS
FOR GENERAL PRACTITIONERS FROM A
GENERAL PRACTITIONER
presented by
~rIT-T-TA~ B. RIdDELL
to the
II:~.'F., CITY AITORNEYS ASSOCIATION
OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
at its
PYNUAL CONFERENCE
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
on the
E~ES OF MARCH
1997
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 1
· I. SOURCES OF USEFUL INFORMATION
'A.
THE WORLD WIDE WEB - INTERNET SITES
1. Federal Communications Commission: http:/www.fcc.gov/
2. California Public Utilities Commission: http:/www.cpuc.ca.gov/
3. California State Senate: http:/www.sen.ca. gov/
4. California State Assembly: http:/www.assembly.ca. gov/
5. National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors:
http:/www.natoa. org/
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY PUBLICATIONS
1. Cable World (weekly publication)
2. Multichanncl News (weekly publication)
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
1.
e
,
Multichannel Video Compliance Guide (monthly publication)
"Nation's Cities Weekly," published by the National League of Cities,
Washington, D.C.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996: Law & Legislative History, published
by Pike & Fischer, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland
The California Municipal Law Handbook (1995 edition), Chapter Ix/, pp. 89-
97, published by the League of California Cities
Telecommunications: Planning for the Future (1996), published by the
International City/County Management Association, Washington, D.C.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996: What It l~ns to Local Governments
(1996), published by the National League of Cities and Public Technology, Inc.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 2
STATUTES AND CODES
47 United StaBs Code Annotated ("Telegraphs, Telephones, and
Radiotelegraphs")
California Government Code (numerous provisions - See Municipal Law
Handbook)
California Public Utilities Code (numerous provisions - See Municipal Law
Handbook)
CONSULTING FIRMS
CI'here are many competent consulting firms that offer services to municipalities in
connection with cable-television franchise renewals, cable-television rate regulations,
needs assessments, technical reviews, etc.)
ORGANIZATIONS
Many public agency attomeys involved with telecommunications matters belong to
NATOA ,- the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors.
Membership in this national organization automaiically (upon payment of a $10 fee)
entities California attorneys to membership in a regional chapter known as "SCAN/
NATOA." "SCAN" means Southern California and Nevada.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 3
II. GLOSSARY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS TERMSv
Here's a "starter kit" for your own personal glossary of a bewildering array of new
terms, abbreviations, and acronyms that have become pan of the jargon of the
tilecommunications industry:
access channels are set aside by the cable operator for use by the public, educational insti-
tutions, municipal government, or for lease on a non-d~scriminatory basis.
analog is a type of electrical signal that resembles the original source. For example, an
analog watch uses two hands circling to represent hours and minutes in a continuous man-
ner, as opposed to a digital watch, which measures time in discrete units. The watch with
hands is .analogous to continuous time. An analog signal over a telephone converts voice into
continuous electrical impulses. Most telephone lines today use analog signals, but special
phone equipment can process digital signals. The wireless telephone industry has just con-
verted to either digital or some combination of digital and analog to increase their capacity
within bandwidth. Analog transmissions have much less capacity, in terms of both volume
and speed, than digital transmissions. See digital. Ultimately, the information superhigh-
way will be digital.
backbone is the term used to describe the major, high volume routes connecting major points
along the information highway from which other lesser volume, and potentially lesser speed,
routes travel to other points. Most of the backbone is fiber optic cable. The big issue in con-
structing the information superhighway is not necessarily the backbone, but what wires and
services will be provided to the 'curb," which is your home or office.
'bandwidth is used to measure the transmission capacity or frequency of a particular me-
dium, wired or wireless. Digital transmission rates are usually measured in bits per second,
and when digital data is converted to frequencies for transmission it may be measured in
cycles per second, or hertz, where one frequency .cycle is one hertz. A frequency measure is
equal to or greater than bits per second. Bandwidth determines the capacity of a particular
transmission. For example, the highest bandwidths are necessary for transfer of'pictures
and video images, whereas narrow bandwidths are sufficient for many data and voice trans-
missions.
Narrowband Wideband Broadband I
0 bps 64Kbps 128Kbps 1.SMbps 45Mbps 155Mbps 600+Mbps
bps = bits per second
_*/ Source: Telecommunications: Planning for the Future (19q6), published by International
City/County Management Association, Washington D.C.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 4
basic cable is usually the minimum amount of cable TV service available to a subscriber for
a standard installation and monthly fee. It generally includes over-the-air broadcast signais
and local originations.
baud is the number of times that a signal changes its pattern each second. For example,
9600 baud changes its signal 9,600 times each second (by contemporary standards, this is a
slow transmission rate).
bit or binary digit is the single digit, zero or one (0, 1), and is the basis for the byte and all
digital transmissions. Eight bits equal one byte, and originally most chips in 'personal com-
puters were eight bit. Now there are sixteen and thirty-two bit chips in the personal com-
puter.
bits per second (bps) is the speed of transmission measured in bits per second. The actual
bps will exceed the baud rate.
broadband technologies transmit large amounts of data, voice, and especially video. These
high frequency, high bits per second transmissions must be carried over coaxial or optical
fiber cables or wireless. See bandwidth.
cellular service is wireless telephone service within a defined geographic area or "cell."
Most systems today are capable of handing off calls from one cell to another when a person
travels. Most cellular phone systems use narrowband technologies and most have now moved
to digital transmissions but still use some analog signals.
coaxial cable is a pencil-thick cable with a central insulated conducting wire surrounded by
insulation and an aluminum or copper casing. The coaxial cable can carry far more informa-
tion than copper "twisted pair' telephone lines, but less than fiber optics cable. It is rela-
tively inexpensive and is commonly used for cable TV.
common carrier is a company that supplies local and long-distance telecommunications
services to the public. A common carrier must be licensed by the Federal Communications
Commission and its prices and services are usually regulated. The regulatory goal is to
assure that services considered essential to the public are provided on an open and non-
discriminatory basis to those willing and able to pay for them. Before 1995, telephone com-
panies were considered common carriers, while cable TV operaton were not.
competitive access providers (CAPs) are companies that compete with monopoly local
telephone companies by installing their own transmission networks to connect large busi-
ness customers directly to long distance carriers, thus avoiding the access charge, or to pro-
vide other local phone services.
compression, digital or data compression is a technique for encoding data so that it takes
up less computer space and time for processing. A common method of compression is elimi-
nating blank spaces in a fixed field, such as a name or address.
digital is a type of electrical signal that is usually broken down into binary digits (0, 1). See
bit. All modern computers and most every peripheral device use digital processing. The great
advantage of digital processing and transmission is increased speed and volume, or capacity.
Think of how much faster it is to change the time on a digital watch as opposed to an analog
watch with two hands.
direct broadcast satellite service (DBS) is a system in which signals are transmitted
directly from a satellite to a small (18') h6me receiving dish. DBS refers specifically to high-
power transmissions in bands specified by the FCC, rather than current C-band, which home
satellite dishes receive. DBS competes with cable television.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 5
distance learning is education with one-Way or tWo-way interactive voice and video pre-
sentations. Sometimes referred to as the virtual classroom. distance learning is particularly
appealing in rural areas.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was created by the Communication Act of
1934 to regulate radio and television broadcasting, but now has greatly enlarged its scope to
in~l~tdo ~ablc, wireless, and satellite tranamnsions. Th~ FGG has become the prtmar!/regu-
lator ot the in~'ormation sup, rhighway. Ths FCC is now roads ui} of ~v~ persons from bo~h
parties nominated by the President and approved by the Senate for five-year toms, one
expiring each year. The FCC licenses and auctions bandwidth to private intorests, and is
charged with developing regulations to implement the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
fiber optics is a form of transmission that uses light, as opposed to electricity, in order to
transmit information. Thin, flexible strands of glass or plastic are used to transmit data at
much higher rates and volume than traditional coppar or coaxial wires using electrical
impulses. Optical fiber provides much greater bandwidth than either copper wires or coaxial
cables (a single strand can carry 12,000 telephone conversations at once), consumes less
electricity, and is insensitive to electromagnetic glitches. It cannot transmit electrical power.
franchise is a contractual agreement between a cable operator and a governmental body
which defines the rights and responsibilities of each in the construction and operation of a
cable TV system. Commonly a franchise fee is paid as compensation for use of public right-
of-way for private gain. For example, a private company may pay a municipality a franchise
fee for putting fiber optic cable alongside railroad tracks, or a cable TV company may pay a
fee to use public streets and easements for running its cable. The right to collect a franchise
fee was originally established in the 1866 Telegraph Act and reaffirmed in the Telecommuni-
cations Act of 1996. Franchise fees may be regulated by state statutes. The majority of states
.allow compensation to local governments for granting the use of rights-of-way.
hybrid fiber-coax is'an architecture for new broadband networks that has been adopted by
many cable and telephone companies (including Pacific Bell and TCI) to deliver video, tele-
phone, and data services. Some projects use fiber optic cable to carry signals to neighbgrho0d
nodes. The final connection to homes is made with lower-cost coaxial cable. Other hybrid
networks use fiber optic cable to carry signals to the "curb" and then coaxial to the home.
intranet is an internal network that uses the power of a World Wide Web server to integrate
various hardware and software platforms, in order.to facilitate communication and exchange
of information within an organization or work group.
independent telephone company is a privately or publicly owned company that is not
affiliated with offe of the regional Bell operating companies. There are about 1,300 indepen-
dent phone companies with about 22 percent of the telephone access lines that serve large
portions of the United States.
integrated services digital network (ISDN) is an international telecommunications standard
for the digital transmission of data, voice and video, or a digital telephone service. It is a
technology designed to increase the capacity of copper telephone wires up to 64Kbps thus
permitting simultaneous transmission of hundreds of communications, multipage faxing,
and fair-quality video images. ISDN uses one channel to carry the information and a second
channel to control information signaling. ISDN lines are not wi.dely available to residential
areas but can be found in most large commercial areas. Broadband ISDN, which is
regarded by some as the future of communications for the information superhighway, uses
broadhand transmissions on fiber optic cables at speeds of up to 150 megabits per second.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 6
interactive is the near instantaneous two-way dialogue between two users or between t~s-
ers and their computer. Interactive is an important feature of such applications as e-mail,
CD-ROMs, home shopping, cable TV video rentals, or distance learning. In the future it is
expected that most applications will be required to be interactive in order to gain user accep-
tance on the information superhighway.
internet is a network of networks. The Interact consists of all those computers that provide
access and work together to form a seamless web of users and servers. The Interact actually
grew out of the Department of Defense where the need to support military research led to the
development of something called the Interact Protocol (IF), a way to address and send mes-
sages from one computer to another. The National Science Foundation then used the Internet
Protocol to chain together computers on university campuses across the country. This net-
work of computers has grown to include thousands of public, private, and non-profit comput-
ers. Today the Interact is managed by a group of invited volunteers called the Internet
Architecture Board and a host of task forces and working groups.
leased lines are permanently connected private telephone lines between two places. Leased
lines are used to connect major networks.
local area network (LAN) is a network of computers within a confined area such as an
office suite or building. A personal computer on a LAN can work either alone or in concert
with the other computers on the LAN. ALAN is usually made up of file servers, worksta-
tions, a network operating system, and communications links. The LAN can be connected to
other networks.
local exchanZe carriers (LEGs) are the local telephone companies. There are 1,327 local
exchange carriers in the nation, 19 of which are affiliated with one of the seven regional Bell
operating companies. GTE corporation is the parent company for 23 LEGs.
local loop is the term used to refer to the local telephone exchange.
microwave transmission is a way of providing bandwidth via a series of antennae, trans-
mitters, and reflectors on towers. Very short radio waves carrying voice,.data, or video com-
munications travel in a straight line from tower to tower. Microwave can be made fully compatible
with digital service.
modem (modulate and demodulate) is a device on a computer that connects the computer to
a transmission line, typically a phone line. It changes digital information to wave form and
back again. Speed is the main criterion when choosing a modem. See baud or bps.
multichannel multipoint distribution service (MMDS) is a private service using very
high frequencies to transmit more than one TV signal. Also known as wireless cable.
national information infrastructure is the Clinton administration's name for the infor-
mation highway. It is 'a web of advanced communications networks, computers, databases
and consumer electronics that will put vast amounts of information at users' fingertips." The
national information infrastructure initiative produced an Agenda for Action in 1993 with
the policy goals stated as:
Promote private sector investment
Extend universal access concept
Promote technological innovation
Promote seamless, interactive, user-driven operation
Ensure information security and network reliability
.Improve management of radio frequency spectrum
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 7
Protect intellectual property rights
Coordinate with other levels of government and nations
Provide access to government information.
National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) is the federal agency
within the Department of Commerce that is charged with developing the national infor-
mation infrastructure. .
network is an arrangement of computers that are interconnected and provide some level of
communication and sharing of information among the members or nodes of the network.
There are a number of different topologies and types of networks and protocols for sharing
data. With communications capability every computer can belong to one or more networks.
online services are the commercial companies such as America Online, CompuServe, Delphi,
Prodigy, GEnie and many others that offer information services to individual subscribers for
. monthly access charges.
open access is a policy goal to give all persons nondiscriminatory access to network facili-
ties, services, functions, and information where technically feasible and economically rea-
sonable.
open systems architecture refers to computer systems that are designed to be indepen-
dent of any vendor-specific requirements and can therefore interconnect with a variety of
products. It is expected that open systems architecture will be the general policy followed by
most developers on the information highway.
-open video system (OVS) is a concept introduced by the Telecommunicati0ns Act of 1996
and replaces the video dial tone concept in the federal regulatory lexicon. Under FCC rules
to be developed to implement the Act, a local. exchange carrier (the local phone company) or
a cable company providing cable services can select only one-third of the channels to be
programmed on the system. The other two-thirds of the channels are to be made available to
programmers under non-discriminatory rates, terms, and conditions. OVS providers are to
have some reduced regulatory burdens under the new FCC rules, but--of critical importance
to local governments--may be subject to fees similar to franchise fees, though a typical cable
franchise is not required if the company gets an OVS certificate of compli~mce from the FCC.
See video dial tone.
packet switchin~ is a system whereby long messages are broken down into short segments,
or packets, for rapid transmission. Packets can vary from 40 to 32,000 bytes, but are usually
less than 1,500 bytes long. Packets of information are transmitted using code-divided or
time-divided protocols, but they are received in a seemingly continuous manner. For example,
even though your transmitted voice over a cellular phone is broken up into thousands of
packets the received voice transmission will sound continuous. Packet switching is an eco-
nomical, fast means of digital communication.
pay-per-view is cable programming for which subscribers pay on a one-time basis for indi-
vidual programs, such as prize fights and movie premiers.
personal communications services (PCSs) or personal communications networks (PCNs)
are digital wireless communications technology such as personal ~agers, cellular telephones,
personal laptops with.modems, etc. Such mobile technology promises to allow each consumer
to use the same telephone number wherever he or she goes. The FCC has auctioned off
licenses for several PCS networks in each region.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 8
platform is the type of hardware architecture used by a particular network or family of
computers. In the world of personal computing the .IBM-compatible/Intel chip and the Apple/
Motorola chip have traditionally been two. separate platforms. UNIX systems or VAX sys-
tems are also different hardware platforms. The issue on the information superhighway is
being able to communicate across platforms.
public, educational, and government (PEG) access to local cable television is provided
to communities who want it by virtue of the 1984 Cable Act via channels set aside for these
purposes. Public access is an important principle which needs to apply to all telecommunica-
tions and information systems and services used by the public, which are paid for in part by
public funds and taxes or franchise fees.
public switched 'network is a worldwide telecommunications system that provides com-
munications services between all telephones or other equipment. In the U.S., regulated local
exchange carriers make the public switched network universally available at a reasonable
cost.
regional Bell operating companies (RBOCs) are the seven regional holding companies
that were created with the breakup of AT&T in 1982. The seven RBOCs are Ameritech, Bell
Atlantic, BellSouth, NYNEX, Pacific Telesis, Southwestern Bell and US West. In some cases
these RBOCs subsumed local operating companies.
rights-of-way are the public access routes such as roads, underground conduits, overhead
wires, and railroads that are controlled by local governments. In most states, the state has
title and authority to regulate and control rights-of-way, but that authority is usually del-
egated by statute to local governments.
satellite master antenna television service (SMATV) is a system consisting of a
~eceive-only satellite earth station and a master antenna that receives over'the'air'televi-
sion broadcast signals. These signals are combined and distributed through cable to sub-
scribers residing in multi-unit dwellings.
spectrum allocations refer to the bandwidth that is allocated by the Federal Commu-
nications Commission. Very recently the FCC auctioned off a portion of the bandwidth
that was previously reserved for government use to commercial firms interested in personal
communications devices. Spectrum allocations are becoming an increasingly significant source
of revenue for the federal government.
switched access is a network or telephone cofinection that can be turned on and off as
needed. Your normal telephone service is switched access because it allows you to create a
link when you call and destroy that link when you hang up.
twisted pair ~rire is a .cable consisting of insulated copper wire organized in distinct pairs
that are twisted around each other in order to identify each separate circuit and reduce
electrical interference. Individual pairs of wire are the primary path between a customer's
premises and the telephone company's local central office. Twisted pair wire has been stan-
dard in the telephone industry for decades and provides the least expensive way to connect
to the information superhighway.
unbundling is the practice of offering telecommunications services, programs, software,
training, and hardware separately. RBOCs traditionally provided services 'bundled" into
packages, until the FCC in 1992 forced them to offer those components unbundled so that
communications vendors and customers ~ould pick and choose among services.
universal service is the public policy goal that Congress first mandated in the 1934 Com-
munications Act to make telephone service widely available at affordable prices. Universal
service has been variously defined, and its definition .;vill continue to evolve as the FCC
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 9
implements the Telecommunications Act of 1996. A less ambitious definition of universal
service might include public access to the information superhighway from every school, hos-
pital, government office, library, and post office; a more ambitious definition would include
public access from every household.
video dial tone (VDT) is the phrase used to describe access to movies and other video
programming over telephone lines. With advances in transmission technologies and the
increasing use of optical fibber, telephone companies can provide video services that effec-
tively allow them to compete with cable companies and television broadcasters. See open
video systems.
video conferencing or teleconferencing is the near simultaneous transmission of voice and
video between two or more groups or individuals. The transmissions can be one-way but are
preferably two-way. Several new computer systems provide point-to-point video conferencing
over ISDN phone lines.
video programmer is any provider of video programs, such as cable operators, broadcast-
ers, and satellite program distributors. Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, tele-
phone companies are allowed to own and offer video programs.
wired is a term used to describe communications over wires. The three major types of wired
communications are copper wire (telephones), coaxial cable (cable TV), and fiber optics. There
are various types and grades of wires within each of these categories.
· wireless is a term used to describe communications without wires, such as local cellular'
".phones, microwave transmissions, and satellite networks.
wide area network (WAN) is a geographically dispersed network of computers.
World Wide Web (WWW) is a hypertext system that allows users to find related informa-
tion quickly on the Internet. It can support audio, pictures, and video in addition to text and
data. Software tools developed to provide Web access to information sites can allow
communication and exchange of data among otherwise incompatible hardware and software
systems.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page I0
OVERVIEW OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996~
Introduction
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "1996 Act") made significant
changes to federal telecommunications law. It is the most comprehensive legislation
pertaining to communications to be adopted since the Communications Act of 1934. It
affects telephone companies, broadcasters, cable operators, wireless communication services,
on-line computer services, other providers of communication services, consumers, and public
agencies. The sheer bulk of the legislation is daunting; however, many provisions do not
affect the regulatory powers of cities.
This overview summarizes those provisions of the 1996 Act that potentially
affect 'a city's regulatory powers and its role as a provider and facilitator of
telecommunica~on services. This discussion covers the following five primary categories:
B.
C.
D.
E.
Television Service
Siting of Antenna Towers
Regulation of Satellite Dishes and Services
Regulation of Public. Right-of-Way Use
Comprehensive Telecommunications Ordinance
Discussion
Television Service
1. Changes in Competition Rules. The 1996 Act authorizes telephone
companies to provide television service in competition with cable operators. Similarly, cable
operators may pwvide local telephone and other telecommunication services in competition
with local telephone companies. The primary goal of the 1996 Act is to encourage
competition among all telecommunication providers and to substantially eliminate the barriers
under prior law that prevented certain telecommunication companies from providing other
_1/ This is the 0nly footnote you have to read. It credits Gregory W. Stepanicich, a parmei'
in the fu'm of Richards, Watson & Gershon, with primary authorship of this "Overview."
This is the expurgated version of that opus. It is now suitable for CAALAC and for
dramatization on stage, screen, radio and television. Watch your local listings!
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 11
types of services. A basic premise of the new law is that, by encouraging competition"
between cab. le operators and local telephone companies, prices will be controlled and
improved service will result.
2. Cable Television. Many provisions of the 1984 and 1992 Cable Acts
are unaffected by the 1996 Act. However, important changes have been made. Cities
currently have the power to regulate subscriber rates for the basic service tier under FCC
rules that provide an objective formula for determining rates that may be charged. Cities do
not have the authority to determine rates based upon quality of service or other subjective
factors. Federal law requires the basic service tier to include local broadcast channels and
the PEG (public, educational, and governmental) access channels. The cable operator can
add other channels to the basic service tier at its discretion. The FCC regulates the
subscriber rates for the cable programming service tier (CPST), which consists of the
nonbasic and nonpremium channels. Pay-per-view and premium channels (e.g., HBO and
Showtime) have been excluded from rate regulation.
Under the 1996 Act, the term "effective competition" has been redefined.
Now, when a local telephone company provides video programming in the area served by the
cable provider, and the video programming is comparable to that provided by the cable
operator, effective competition is deemed to exist, and the City may no longer regulate the
subscriber rates for the basic service tier. With restx~t to the CPST channels, rate
regulation by the FCC will be eliminated on March 31, 1999 (approximately three years
frbm tile effective date of ~e 1996 Act). PacBell may be initiating television service by
microwave technology by the spring of 1997. If a comparable level of service is provided,
cities will lose their power tO regulate subscriber rates for the basic service tier provided by
their cable operators.
Under prior law, cable subscribers could file complaints directly with the FCC
regarding the rates charged for CPST channels. Under ~e 1996 Act, only the City may file
a complaint and only within the time deadlines specified by the new law.
Under the 1996 Act, cities retain the power to franchise and to regulate cable
television services provided by the cable operator. However, cities are prohibited from
requiring a cable franchise for other types of telecommunlcation services that cable operators
are now authorized to provide. Thus, a cable operator that provides telephone services
cannot bc required to pay a local franchise fee on these new services. A city's ability to
regulate other types of service must be reviewed on a case by case basis. For example, the
City of Fremont is collecting its 5 % cable franchise fee on the Internet service provided by
TCI to its cable subscribers. However, cable operators can be expected to take an aggressive
position in 'protecting' their rights under federal law to provide..felecommunlcation services
free from a city's franchise fee. The law is clear that a city may not prohibit its cable
operator from entering other types of telecommunica[ion businesses. As cable companies do
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 12
so, it will be more difficult to accurately determine the franchise fee that is payable by the
cable operator, as revenues from the different .types of services will have to be segregated in
order to determine the fee owed. Also, as pan of any franchise renewal, a city may not
require its cable operator to provide non-cable related telecommunication services or
facilities, other than an institutional network.
The procedural and substantive requirements for the renewal of cable
television franchises were not changed by the 1996 Act. Either a city may initiate, or the
Cable operator may request, formal renewal proceedings within the 6 month period
commencing with the 36th month prior to expiration of the franchise. These proceedings
require notices and public participation for a process whose purpose is to: (1) identify the
future cable-related community needs and interests, and (2) review the past performance of
the cable operator. If this process is neither invoked nor requested, the city and its cable
operator may informally negotiate the renewal of the franchise in accordance with whatever
process may be desired, except that at least one noticed public hearing is required before a
renewal may be approved.
The standards for evaluating the renewal of a cable franchise are limited by
federal law to consideration of the following:
a. Whether the cable operator has substantially complied with the
material terms of the existing franchise.
b. Whether the quality of the operator's services, including signal
quality, response to consumer complaints, and billing practices, but without regard to the mix
or quality of cable services or other services provided over the system, has been reasonable
in light of community needs.
c. Whether the operator has the financial, legal, and technical
ability to provide the .services, facilities, and equipment as set forth in the operator' s
proposal.
d. Whether the operator's proposal is reasonable to meet the future
cable-related community needs and interests, taking into account the cost of meeting such
needs and interests.
These provisions are summarized because many cities must begin
preparing for the renewal process that will occur in a technological environment that is far
different from what existed years ago when cable franchises were last granted or renewed.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 13
3. Telephone Companies. The 1996 'Act gives local telephone companies
four methods by which to provide local television service in competition with franehised
cable operators. These four methods are as follows:
a. Wireless Cable. Wireless cable is a System by which 'the
telephone company will transmit its programming over the air by way of a microwave
technology. Satellites are not used. This type of service is commonly referred to as
multichannel, multipoint distribution services (MMDS). If this method is used, no franchise
can be required by a city unless public right-of-way is used for the delivery of the service.
We understand that the PaeBell plans do not involve the use of public right-of-way. Thus,
franchise fee revenues will be lost for each subscriber dollar. that pays for this type of service
rather than cable television service that is provided under a franchise.
b. Traditional Cable. Telephone companies may provide video
programming in the same manner as a cable operator by obtaining a franchise to use the
public right-of-way for the delivery of that service. All curren~y existing 1984 and 1992
Cable Act requirements would' apply. Franchise fees would be paid at 5 % of subscriber
revenue, and PEG channel requirements would apply.
c. Common Carrier. Tilephone companies may provide video
programming as a common carrier free from any local government regulation. As a
common carrier, the telephone company would transmit the video programming of others
over lines leased to those persons. It would have no editorial control over the .content of .the -
programming provided by others. Itwould simply act as aconduit for the transmission. -
Under this method, no franchise fees are paid, and no PEG channel requirements apply.
d. Open Video System (OVS). An open video system is a new
creation of the 1996 Act. It is not a new technology, but rather a legal construct by which a
telephone company can deliver video programming subject to different regulatory rules.
Under an OVS, the telephone company provides its own video programming service, but it is
also required to make up to two-thirds of its system capacity available to independent
programmers unaffiliated with the telephone company. A city may not require a local
franchise from an OVS operator, because the operator receives its certification to operate
from the FCC. However, a city may impose an in-lieu fee of up to 5 % of subscriber
revenues and may impose the same PEG channel requirements that are imposed on its cable
operator. Most cities have not yet adopted a tilecommunications ordinance that imposes
these requirements on a future OVS operator.
4. Direct-to-Home Satellite Services. The 1996 Act grants to the FCC
exclusive jurisdiction to regulate Direct-to-Home Satellite Services (such as Direct-TV).
Specifically, proriders of these services are exempt from the collection of any tax or fee
imposed by cities. The 1996 Act does not prohibit a state from taxing Direct-to-Home
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 14
Satellite 'Services, and a state may transfer all or a portion of these revenues to local
governments.
5. CillyActions.
Cities should consider the following:
a. Adoption of an ordinance imposing the 5 % in-lieu fee and PEG
channel requirements on OVS operators.
b. Meeting with its franchised cable operator to review plans, if any,
to provide new types of telecommunications services.
c. If the cable television franchise will expire within the next 3
years, commence preliminary discussions on the process that your city desires to follow in
evaluating the renewal of the cable franchise.
Siting of Antenna Towers
1. New limitations
Section 704 of the 1996 Act [47 U.S.C. 332(c)C/)] preserved cities' zoning
power over the installation of antenna towers and other Cellular facilities by the personal
wireless telecommunications industry. Personal wireless telecommunications services include
cellular telephone, paging, and data transmission services. An example of this service is
Metricom's proposal to install on light poles many sinnil antennas that transmit business data
to subscribers.
A city's zoning power over these types. of facilities is subject to the following
limitations imposed by the 1996 Act:
a.. Local regulation may not unreasonably discriminate among
providers of functionally equivalent services.
b. Local regulation may not prohibit or have the effect of
prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.
c. All requests for such facilities must be acted upon within a
reasonable period of time after the request is ~ed, tnlring into account the nature and scope
of the request. The time required for a city to process similar land use requests should be
considered reasonable.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 15
d. Any decision to deny a 'request must be in writing and suppOrted
by substantial evidence contained in a written record. This is the legal test for reviewing
quasi-judicial decisions, such as a decision on a conditional use permit or a planned
development review.
e. No state or local government may regulate the placement of
personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio
frequency emissions. The FCC has adopted radio frequency emission regulations that are
preemptive and that control exclusively.
f. Recourse against a public agency for denying or conditioning
such a facility in an objectionable manner must be taken to the courts within 30 days, rather
than to the FCC.
Recently, a federal District Court in Sprint Spectrum L.P.v. City of Medina,
924 F.Supp. 1036 (W.D. Wash. 1996), upheld a city ordinance that imposed a six-month
moratorium on antenna towers while the city prepared a penanent regulatory ordinance.
Although the above limitations apply to a city's zoning power, a city has
complete discretion as to whether these facilities should be located on its own property,
provided that a city does not act in a discriminatory manner against different personal
wireless service providers. For example, it would be risky to authorize L.A. Cellular to
place its facilities on city-owned property pursuant to a lease, but not authorize .Air Touch'
Cellular to install a similar facility if it was willing to agree to the same lease terms and if
space was reasonably available for that use.
2, CiBr Actions
Each city should evaluate its current zoning requirements related to the
placement of antennas and similar structures to determine whether new regulations should be
adopted.
Regulation of Satellite Dishes
1. New FCC Pre-emption Regulation
Section 207 of the 1996 Act directed the FCC to adopt regulations imposing
restrictions on the ability of viewers to receive certain video programming services. On
August 6, 1996, the FCC adopted its final rule prohibiting ordinances that impair the
installation, maintenance, or use of small antennae used to receive video programming.
FilCHARC)S, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 16
The FCC's new rule applies to residentially-zoned properties having the
following types of antennae:
a. An antenna designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service
(including direct-to-home satellite services such as Direct-TV) that is one meter (39 inches)
or less in diameter;
b. An antenna designed to receive video programming services via
multipoint distribution services (the system proposed by PacBell) that is one meter (39 _
inches) or less in diameter; or
c. An antenna designed to receive over-the-air television broadcast
signals regardless of size.
The new rule also applies to any satellite earth station antenna that is two meters
or less in diameter and located in an area that is zoned commercial or industrial.
Previously,. city ordinances were preempted if they differentiated between
satellite antenna,~ and other types of antenna facilities. However, the FCC made exceptions
for regulations that: (i) have a health, safety or aesthetic objective; and (ii) do not prevent
reception of satellite signals.
.. · The revised rule proMbiB all' regulations that impair the installation.
maintenance.' or'use of antennae to provide the video programming services specified .above.
Thus, 'any restrictions that "impair" acc~s to these services are preempted even if they do
not discriminate as to the type of antenna. For the purposes of this rule, "'impair" means that
the regulation: (i) unreasonably delays or prevents installation, maintenance, or use; (ii)
unreasonably increases the cost of installation, maintenance, or use; or {iii) precludes
reception of an acceptable quality signal. ·
The revised rule exempts only safety regulations and regulations that protect
historic districts. Thus, regulations with an aesthetic objective are no longer specifically
exempt. Further, any safety regulation must be essential to achieve a clearly defined safety
objective stated in the text, preamble, or legislative history of the restriction. Also, such a
restriction must apply to. the extent practicable to other devices and fixtures that are
comparable in size, height, and appearance (such as air conditioning equipment).
An unanswered question is how the FCC will determine which city regulations
"impair" individual access to video programming services. In particular, limitations on the
height of antennae or masts that support satellite antennae are still permitted, so long as there
is room for exception by permit or otherwise to ensure an acceptable quality signal.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 17
In the Report and Order that published the final revisions to the rule, the FCC
provides gUidance on implementing the revision. In' particular, the FCC found that
restrictions on antenna height and installation contained in the Building Officials & Code
Administrator~ 'International, Inc. Code (BOCA) provide a model of a "safety-related"
restriction. Although the FCC referred solely to the restrictions adopted under BOCA, the
discussion is of general applicability:
"Because we believe that the model antenna height and
installation restrictions in the BOCA code are safety-related,
they will be enforceable under our rule. We do not believe it
will be overly burdensome to require, as is provided in the
BOCA code, that antenna users obtain a permit in cases in
which their antennas must extend more than twelve feet above
the roo~ine in order to receive signals. However. we would
find unenforceable any restriction that establishes specific per se
height limits."
Similarly, city codes requiring an antenna to be "screened" or painted a certain
color are still permissible, so long as the costs of complying with the restrictions are not
unreasonable in light of the cost of the equipment or services and the visual impact of the
antenna. For example, an ordinance cannot require a minimally intrusive antenna to be
hidden by exorbitanfly priced materials or landscaping. Additionally, a city's treatment of
Similarly. visible devices,- such as air conditioners, will also be taken into consideration in
determining the'reasonableness of a city's antenna regulations.
Any ordinance that, as applied, precludes reception of an acceptable quality
signal will also be deemed to "impair" access to services. The FCC Report and' Order cited
above provides some clarification as to how a determination will be made:
"Under this criterion, for example, our rule would invalidate a
requirement that an antenna be placed in a position where
reception would be impossible or would be substantially
degrade. However, a regulation requiring that antennas be
placed to the extent feasible in locations that are not visible from
the street would be permitted under our rule, if this placement
would not impair reception of an acceptable signal."
The FCC did not provide clear guidelines concerning the preemption of set-
back requirements. However, the FCC found that permit requirements in connection with
set-backs are "safety-related' rules. Thus, they appear to reinair enforceable under the
revision. However, FCC comments in a later section of the Report and Order stated that
regulations requiring an antenna to beset back from the street "could be deemed to impair
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 18
reception if compliance .would mean that the antenna could not receive an acceptable Signal."
Thus, a city can most effectively comply with the new rule by making special provisions for
individuals who cannot receive adequate reception without violating the set-back regulations.
The FCC rule applies not only a city's zoning regulations, but also to CC&Rs
and other private land use restrictions.
2. City Actions
We recommend that cities consider revisions to current ordinances that
regulate satellite dishes.
1996 Act.
Regulation of Public Right-of-Way Use
1. Limits on Right-of-Way Regulation
A city's control over its public right-of-way is addressed by Section 253 of the
Subsection (a) of this section provides as follows:
"No state or local statute or regulation, or other state or local
legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting
the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate
telecommunications service." '
Subsection (c) states:
"Nothing in this section affects the authority of a state or local
government to manage the public rights-of-way or to require fair
and reasonable compensation from telecommunications providers
on a cbmpett'tively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis, for use
of public rights-of-way on a nondiscriminatory basis, if the
compensation required is publicly disclosed by such
government."
Subsection (c), commonly referred to as a "safe harbor" provision, was an
important addition to the 1996 Act. It preserved the power of local agencies to manage the
use of their public rights-of-way. At the same time, subsection (a) provides that cities may
not impose legal requirements that prohibit the delivery of telecommunication services. The
1996 Act fails to define the term "prohibit.' As a means to enforce the provisions of
subsection (a), subsection (d) authorizes the FCC to preempt state and local requirements that
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 19
violate this subsection. This type of preemption may be expected to occur on a. case-by-Case
basis.
Currently, there is a signifmant petition before the FCC that was fred by TCI'
against the City of Troy. In the Matter of TCI Cablevision of Oakland County. Inc.; File
No. CSR47890. TCI contends that Troy's local right-of-way management policies should be
preempted by the FCC under subsection (d). The City of Troy, supported by the National
League of Cities and many public agencies, asserts that the preemption provisions of
subsection (d) do not apply to right-of-way management policies and regulations that fall
within the safe harbor of subsection (c). According to this argument, any legal requirement
imposed under subsection (c) can be challenged by an aggrieved party only in a court action.
The ultimate resolution of this issue is important to all cities.
The federal statute must be read in conjunction with California law concerning
the use of city streets by telephone companies. California law is clear that cities may not
franchise telephone companies that provide telephone services under a state franchise. Public
Utilities Code Section 7901. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City and County of San Francisco,
51 Cal.2d 766, 771 (1959); Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City and County of San Francisco,
197 Cal. App. 2d 133 (1961). A city, however, may require a telephone company to obtain
an excavation or encroachment permit and to pay all rehted regulatory fees prior to the use
of its streets. A city cannot require that additional compensation be paid for use of the right-
of-way. In 1995, the Public UtiLities Code was amended to add Section 7901.1. This
section provides that municipalities have the right to exercise reasonable control as to the
time, place, and manner in which roads and highways are accessed. For any controls to be
considered reasonable, all entities must be treated in an equal manner.
Public Utilities Code Section 234 defines "telephone corporation" to include
every corporation owning, controlling, operating, or managing any telephone line for
compensation within 'the state. Section 232 defines "telephone line" to include "all conduits,
ducts, poles, wires, cables ... and. all other real estate, fixtures, and personal property
owned, controlled, operated, or managed in connection with communication by telephone,
where such communication is had with or without the use of transmission lines."
Two key issues are raised by these statutes. First, what type of
telecommunications providers will be considered telephone corporations? Second, what types
of services constitute telephone service for the purpose of claiming an exemption from local
franchise requirements?
The California Public' Utilities Commission has interpreted the above
definitions to include corporations that communicate information_by means' other than voice
and that use either one-way or two-way transmissions. See, e.g., Industrial Communications
Systems. Inc. v. Public Utilities Comm., 22 Cal.3d 572, 578 (1978).
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 20
Thus, each telecommunications provider proposing to use city streets must be
separately evaluated. It should not be assumed that representations of a provider contending
that compensation cannot be required for its proposed use of city property are necessarily
correct. For example, Metricore has agreed to pay various cities a franchise fee for the use
of city right-of-way under its proposed agreement, provided that similar providers are treated
in the same manner.
2. Street Degradation Mitigation Fees
Public works officials are concerned about the adverse effects that multiple
paving cuts will have on the useful life of city streets, thereby resulting in increased
maintenance and capital costs. Several cities are considering the adoption of a street
degradation mitigation fee to be paid by any entity (not just telecommunications providers)
that requests permission to excavate in a public street.
The leaders in this effort have been San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San
Diego. All of these cities have conducted studies to justify the methedology of the proposed
fee. San Francisco is considering using a per square foot fee based upon a sliding scale
ranging from $5 per square foot (for streets paved in the last 5 years), $4 per square foot
(for streets paved in the last 6-10 years), and $3 per square foot (for streets paved in the last
11-15 years.) Los Angeles is also considering a per square foot fee based upon a sliding
scale.
The Anaheim City Council recently rejected an ordinance that would have
established a street degradation fee. San Francisco is now drafting its proposed ordinance.
Los Angeles has submitted a proposed ordinance to the City Council's Public Works
Committee. Sacramento and San Diego are now conducting studies to support a proposed
fee.
The FCC, in a recent ruling In the Matter of Classic Telephone. Inc. CCBPol
96-10, addressed the type of regulations that a City may impose on telecommunications '
providers that use the public right-of-way. In this case, the FCC stated:
"Section 253(c) preserves the authority of State and local
governments.to manage the public rights-of-way, but requires
such regulations to be both competitively neutral and
nondiscriminatory ... The legislative history sheds light on
permissible management functions under section 253(c). During
Senate floor debate on section 253(c), Senator Feinstein offered
examples of the types of restrictions that Congress,intended to
permit under section 253(c), including State and local legal
requirements that: (1) regulate the time or location of
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 21
excavation to preserve effective traffic flow, prevent hazardous
road conditions, or minimize notice impacts; (2) require a
company to place its facilities underground, rather than
overhead, consistent with the requirements imposed on other
utility companies; 3) require a company to pay fee.,s to recover
an appropriate share of the increased repair and pavin~ costs
that result from repeated excavation: (emphasis added); 4)
enforce local zoning regulations; and 5) require a company to
indemnify the City against any claims of injury arising from the
company's excavation."
A coalition of approximately 40 northern and southern California cities has
been formed to discuss the issue of street degradation mitigation fees. George Alvarez, the
City Engineer of Santa Aria, is curren~y the chairperson of this coalition.
3. City Actions
Cities should consider the following:
a. Carefully evaluate each request by a telecommunications
provider to use the public right-of-way in order to determine if a franchise or other form of
compensation may be required.
b.. Adopt a street degradation mitigation fee after completing the
necessary supporting study.
c. Establish nondiscriminatory written policies for the use of cil~y
streets by telecommunications providers.
d. Study the best method for developing a telecommunicafions
infrastructure (i.e., should it be left to the private sector, or should the City play a role in
constructing and owning the system?)
E. Comprehensive Telecommunications Ordinance
Many cities are now considering the adoption of a comprehensive
Telecommunications Ordinance in order to address various provisions of the 1996 Act and
the implementing regulations of the FCC.
RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CAALAC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
IDES OF MARCH, 1997
Page 22
A comprehensive Telecommunications Ordinance would presumably address
various telecommunications services and facilities described above, and define the roles that a
city may play in telecommunications,. such as the following:
1. As regulator. This role involves regulation of the public right-of-way,
cable television franchises, antenna towers, open video systems, and satellite dishes.
2. As service l~rovider. This role involves the City's use of
telecommunications, which may include a city's web site, an institutional network, access to
the Intemet, and other telecommunication services that may be provided to a city' s residents.
3. As facilitator. This role is one of encouraging improved public and
private telecommunication'services to be provided to a city's residents. It includes
addressing a city's telecommunication infrastructure. A key issue here is whether a city
should provide the infrastructure both for its own needs and for the telecommunications
private' sector that would lease excess capacity in that publicly-owned infrastructure.
Conclusion
Most of the pwvisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that affect.
cities. were. drafted in very general terms. Substantial rule-making authority was conferred
upon the FCC to define more specifically how this comprehensive statute will be
implemented. Thus, administrative and judicial interpretations of the 1996 Act, and of its
ultimate impact on cities, will be an evolving process. City Attorneys who belong to
CAALAC, the City Attorneys Department of the League, and other organizations may
reasonably expect to be offered "Telecommunications Update" sessions for decades to come!
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA~2'~-~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Coundl
FROM: :~~erman Pa_rker, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 22, 1999
SUBJECT:
Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape,
Inc., for FY1999-00
PREPARED BY:
~r'Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Coundl:
Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape, Inc., to
reassign the odginal agreement between The City of Temecula and Excel Landscape, Inc., to the
Temecula Community Services District.
DISCUSSION: The re-assignment of the odginal agreement between the City of
Temecula (City) and Excel Landscape, Inc., (Excel) to the Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD) is required to correct some technical concerns the City Attorney has with the present agreement.
The odginal agreement was between the City and Excel, however all of the subsequent amendments
(a total of six) are between the TCSD and Excel. In order to mitigate his concerns the City Attomey has
structured the contract amendment before you to allow for this re-assignment of the odginal agreement
to the TCSD. The reassignment will require the approval of both the City Coundl and the TCSD.
The contract also contains other provisions to extend the agreement for an additional two-year term and
allow for the addition of supplemental landscape maintenance contract areas that will come on line
during the remaining term of the agreement. This would require the approval by the Board of Directors
upon their acceptance of the re-assignment.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Amendment
Original Agreement
Six (6) subsequent Amendments
R:/HARRINGK~AGENDA.RP'DEXCELEXTENDgg-00.TCSD
AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of June 22, 1999
by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), Temecula Community Services District
("District") and Excel Landscape, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as
follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes, which the parties agree are true and correct:
a. On June 24, 1997, the City and Contractor, for the benefit of the
District, entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the
City's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights
-of-way.
b. The original Agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August
11, 1998, January 11, 1998, and March 22, 1999, April 5, 1999, and April 15, 1999 in
order to add areas to the Contractor' s Scope of Work. The June 24, 1997 Agreement,
as amended, shall be referred to as the "Agreement."
c. Section 9, of the Agreement provides for a contract term of 24
months which would expire on June 24, 1999 and a provision for two one year
extensions of the term of the agreement.
d. It is the desire of the parties to extend the term of this Agreement
for an additional period of two (2) years with a modified contract price and provisions
to add new parks and landscaped areas to the Scope of Work.
as follows:
Section 2. of the Agreement, Scope of Work, is hereby amended to read
"2. SCOPE OF WORK
"A. Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services in accordance with the
"City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the
areas described in the RFP and specifically designated on Exhibit A, Landscape
Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
B. A number of additional areas within the City will require landscape
maintenance services upon the completion of certain facilities during the term of
this Agreement, which areas described on Exhibit B, Supplement Landscape
Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMN~Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
as follows:
reference. Upon the effective date of any Change Order pursuant to Section 3
of this Agreement authorizing Contractor to provide landscape maintenance
services for one or more of the areas described on Exhibit B, Contractor shall
perform everything required to.be performed, shall provide and furnish all the
labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and
transportation services in accordance with the "City of Temecula: General
Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the designated areas."
3. Section 3 of the Agreement, Change Orders, is hereby amended to read
follows:
"3. CHANGE ORDERS
"The City Manager is hereby authorized to approve Change Orders which: (1)
authorize the Contractor to_ proceed with landscape maintenance services for one
or more of the SupplemenY Contract Areas designated in Exhibit B at the prices
set forth in Exhibit B; or (2) modify the scope of work for a Contract Area, a
Supplemental Contract Area or the General Landscape Maintenance
Specifications so long as the cumulative total costs of all such modifications
under this subsection (2) does not increase the total annual cost of the services
provided under this Agreement by more than ten percent (10 %). All other
Change Orders shall be approved by the Board of Directors."
4. Section 4 of the Agreement, Payments, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"4. COMPENSATION; PAYMENTS
"The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually
performed in accordance with the price schedules set forth in Exhibits A and B.
Contractor shall submit monthly invoices to the City specifying the work
accomplished during the period covered (ie., fertilization, pest control, etc. ).
The City shall review the invoices submitted by Contractor to determine
whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made within thirty-five
(35) days following receipt of the invoice or City shall provide Contractor with
a written statement objecting to the invoice and specifying the objections.
Monthly invoices shall be sent to the City's Finance Department at the address
specified in Section 25."
5. Section 9 of the Agreement, Term, is hereby amended to read as
"9. TERM
A,
The Amendment shall remain in full force and effect until June
30, 2001.
Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with
or without cause, on thirty (30) days written notice to the other
party."
R:XHARRINGKXAGREEMNTXExcel Landscape 6.99 Ame~. 7.doc
6. The Section 19, Insurance, of Section 1, Instruction and Information, of
the Request for Proposal dated May 21, 1997 and incorporated into the Agreement pursuant to
Section 1. of the Agreement, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"19. Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least
as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA
00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
"b . Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain
limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than:
(1) General Liability: two million dollars ($2,000,000) per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If
Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general
aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply
separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be
twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
(3) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's
Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily
injury or disease.
"c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles
or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City
Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City,
District and, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration and defense expenses.
"d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and
automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the
following provisions:
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT',Exce! Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
7. Exhibit A, Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached to this
Seventh Amendment, is hereby substituted in place of all Exhibits to the Agreement and the
Amendments to the Agreement, including Exhibits 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 5A, and 6.
8. Exhibit B, Supplemental Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas,
attached to this Seventh Amendment, is hereby added to the Agreement.
9. City hereby assigns the Agreement to the District, which assignment is
accepted by the District. City hereby ratifies the acts of the District taken pursuant to
Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
10. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
////
IIII
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMN'BExcel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
be executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Steven J. Ford
Mayor
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Jeff Comerchero
President
Attest:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney/District Counsel
EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC., a California Corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
EXHIBIT A
Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas
(Amended as of June 8, 1999)
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site # Site Name
P-1 Veterans Park
P-2 Sam Hicks Monument Park
P-3 Calle Aragon Park
P-4 Bahia Vista Park
P-5 Loma Linda Park
P-6 Riverton Park
P-7 John Magee Park
P-9 Voorburg Park
P-10 Nicolas Road Park
P-11 Butterfield Stage Park
P-12 Temecula Duck Pond
P-13 Rotary Park
P-14 Nakayama Park
P-15 Winchester Creek Park
Monthly Price
$1,550.00
800.00
250.00
250.00
707.00
1,617.00
310.00
303.00
812.00
782.00
2,155.00
300.00
125.00
1,568.00
Annual Price
$18,600.00
9,600.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
8,484.00
19,404.00
3,720.00
3,636.00
9,744.00
9,384.00
25,860.00
3,600.00
1,500.00
18,816.00
TOTAL
$ 11,529.00
$138,348.00
R:\HARRINGK~,AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
STREETSCAPE SERVICE AREA
Site #
SS-1
Site Name
Via Eduardo Streetscape
Monthly Price
$106.00
Annual Price
$1,272.00
TOTAL
$ 106.00
$ 1,272.00
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT\ExceI Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4 (P-8)
SP-5
Site Name
Rancho California Sports Park
Paloma Del Sol Park
Pala Community Park
Kent Hintergardt Park
Margarita Community Park
Monthly Price
$9,294.00
3,592.00
2,333.00
3,359.00
3,147.00
Annual Price
$111,528.00
43,104.00
27,996.00
40,308.00
37,764.00
TOTAL
$ 21,725.00
$ 260,700.00
R:\HAR. RINGK~GREEMNT~Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.do{:
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site #
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
M-5
Site Name
Rancho California Road Median
Ynez Road Median
Butterfield Stage Road Median
Margarita Road Median
Margarita Road Median at 79 South
Monthly Price
$400.00
500.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
Annual Price
$4,800.00
6,000.00
1,800.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
TOTAL
$ 1,250.00
$15,000.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT~Excel Landscape 6.99 Amend. 7.doc
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7 (SS-2)
Site Name
Community Recreation Center
Senior Center
City Hall/Maintenance Facility
Temecula Community Center
Fire Station #84
Old Town Parking Lot A
Old Town Streetscape
TOTAL
Monthly Price
$1,444.00
361.00
541.00
193.00
400.00
250.00
987.00
$ 4,176.00
AnnuaiPrice
$17,328.00
4,332.00
6,492.00
2,316.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
11,844.00
$ 50,112.00
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNTXExcel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
Site #
S-3a
S-3b
S-4
S-8
S-12
S-13
S-16
Site Name
Rancho Highlands
Rancho Highlands - Ynez Road Slope
The Vineyards
The Villages A and B
Vintage Hills
Presley (Viranda, Country
Glen, Bridlevale)
Tradewinds "'
Monthly Price
$515.00
1,000.00
255.00
4,734.00
4,600.00
1,408.00
863.00
Annual Price
$6,180.00
12,000.00
3,060.00
56,808.00
55,200.00
16,896.00
10,356.00
TOTAL
$ 13,375.00
$ 160,500.00
R:\HARRINGK~.GREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7,doc
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(NORTH)
Site # Site Name
S-1 SaddlewoodlPavillion Point
S-2 Winchester Creek I and II
S-5 Signet Series
S-6 Woodcrest Country
S-7 Ridgeview
S-9 Rancho Solana
S-10 Martinique
S-11 Meadowview Estates
S-14 Mirada
S-15 Barclay Estates
S-17 Monte Vista
Monthly Price
$2,372.00
1,202.00
2,534.00
559.00
773.00
130.00
355.00
150.00
394.00
344.00
565.00
Annual Price
$28,464.00
14,424.00
30,408.00
6,708.00
9,276.00
1,560.00
4,260.00
1,800.00
4,728.00
4,128.00
6,780.00
TOTAL
$ 9,378.00
$112,536.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-.~) Amend. 7.doc
Site #
Mo6
M-7
M-8
M-9
M-10
M-11
M-12
M-13
M-14
EXHIBIT B
Supplement Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas
(Amended as of June 8, 1999)
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site Name
Margarita Road Median at Solana Ridge
Margarita Road Median at Tuscany Ridge
Margarita Road Median at Win~'hester Road
Margarita Road Median at Promenade Mall
Margarita Road Median at T-28650
Winchester Road Median at Jefferson
Rancho California Road Median at Portafino
Paseo Del Sol Median Islands
Solana Way Median Islands
Monthly Price
$50.00
100.00
50.00
300.00
75.00
100.00
100.00
500.00
75.00
TOTAL
$ 1,350.00
Annual Price
$600.00
1,200.00
600.00
3,600.00
900.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
6,000.00
900.00
16,200.00
R:\HARRINGK%AGREEMNT\ExcoI Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
SPORTS PARK SERVICE AREAS
Site #
SP-6
Site Name
Temeku Hills Sports Park
Monthly Price
$3,600.00
Annual Price
$43,200.00
TOTAL
$ $3,600.00
$ 43,200.00
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT\Exccl Landscape 6-99 AmeN. 7.doe
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
F-8
F-9
Site Name
Temecula Valley Museum
Old Town Parking Lot B
Monthly Price
$285.00
250.00
Annual Pdce
$3,420.00
3,000.00
TOTAL
$ 535.00
$ 6,420.00
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered into this 241h day of June 1997.
By and Between
City ofTemecula, a
Municipal corporation
hereina~er referred to
as "CITY"
and
Excel Landscape. Inc.
a California Corporation
hereinafter referred to
as "CONTRACTOR"
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain the services of a landscape maintenance Contractor to perform
landscape maintenance within the CITY's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space
areas, parks and rights-of-way.
WHEREAS, Contractor is a firm that possesses the necessary equipment, licenses, insurance, and
personnel to provide such services; and
WHEREAS, CITY's Council has authorized execution of this AGREEMENT to retain the services
of Contractor.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed that CITY does hereby retain Contractor to provide
landscape maintenance under the following terms:
1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The complete Contract includes the following documents: I) RFP and 2) General Landscape
Specifications. When the Specifications describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place
and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall
furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in
executing the Contract.
2. SCOPF. OF WORK
r',Jkaf~k~yb%aggr, d~ht97-8, rf~
CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the
labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,_ and all utility and transportation services in
accordance with "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for slopes
(north) and neighborhood parks as described in the RFP.
3. CHANGE ORDERS
All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manger is hereby
authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an
amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
4. PAYMENTS
The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually performed in accordance
with the pricing sheets attached hereto as Exhibits I and 2, and incorporated herein as though set
forth in full. Included with monthly billing will be the work functions accomplished during that
period, (i.e., fertilization, pest control, etc.). The City shall review the invoices submitted by the
Contractor to determine whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made thirty-five (35)
days following submittal of the invoice, or City shall provide the Contractor with a written statement
objecting to the invoice.
Monthly invoices shall be sent
City of Temecula
Finance Department
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: NONPERFORMANCE
Ao
Contractor may be assessed penalties by City up to one hundred percent (100%) of
the monthly value of a site for nonperformance and up to sixty percent (60%) of the
monthly value of a site for substandard performance. Such penalties shall be assessed
at the discretion of the City. Contractor shall be notified of any penalties in
accordance with the terms of this Contract.
The Contract may be terminated by City for failure of Contractor to satisfactorily
perform any corrective action after being notified of service failure on more than
seven(7) occasions during the base term of the Contract.
C,
Contractor shall be notified of service failure by delivery of a "Performance Deficiency
Notification" form to Contractor by City.
Said notice will serve as formal notification that Contractor has incurred a service
r~Kk;yb~nd~uUrd~7-~.rfp
deficiency sufficiently material that contract termination may result if satisfactory
corrective action is not taken by Contractor.
D,
The Performance Deficiency Notification will contain the acceptable time period for
service correction. Upon Deficiency Notification, the correction will either be
accepted or rejected. If accepted, part or all of the penalties may be waived,
regardless of whether City has incurred loss as a result of said service failure.
Contractor will be notified of correction acceptance status by delivery of a
Performance Deficiency Status Memorandum. Should correction not be accepted, a
separate additional Performance Deficiency Notification will be delivered to
Contractor, thus increasing the number of Deficiency Notices received by Contractor.
If Contractor should neglect or refuse or fail for any reason to perform the work, the
City may terminate the Contract for nonperformance with five (5) days written notice
to Contractor.
E,
In case of termination by the City for nonperformance, the City may contract or cause
to be done any work not completed at the time of the termination, and the Contractor
shall pay for such work.
6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS
Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or before making each request for
payment, Contractor shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising
out of this Contract; the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a waiver of all
claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and
request for payment. Contractor shall execute an affidavit and release with each claim for payment.
7. PREVAII,ING WAGES
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California, the City
Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday
and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute
this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file
with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing
wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 oftheLabor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the CITY, as a
penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or
mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this
Contract, by him or by any sub-contractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
8. LIABILITY rNSURANCE
CONTRACTOR, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to
be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with
the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the
performance of the work of this Contract.
9. TERM
A,
The Contract shall remain in full force and effect for a period of 24 months from
the date of written notice to proceed, unless terminated by either party.
B,
City reserves the right to_exercise its option to extend this Agreement for two one-
year extensions within ninety (90) days prior to its expiration. Contract price shall be
adjusted at the beginning of each calendar year in accordance with the changes in the
Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-
Riverside Area published monthly by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics
(CPI).
Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with or without cause
within thirty (30) days written notice to the other party.
10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in this COntract. All time requirements stated herein shall be satisfied.
11. INDEMNIFICATION
All work covered by this Contract done at the work site or in preparing or delivering materials to the
site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and
defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of
persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly Or indirectly
out of the 9bligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and
except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of
the CITY.
12. CONTRACTOR'S INDF-PENDENT 1NVFSTIGATION
No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions or difficulties
that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to
make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial
investigations or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be
accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail
all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims
whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
13. GRATUITIES
CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it~or any of its employees, agents, or representatives with a
view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto.
14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way
associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other provider of
Specifications. Contractor further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by
the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
Simultaneously with submitting each monthly invoice, Contractor shall file with the City his affidavit
stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all sub-contractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project
for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering
disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions
of the laws of the State of California.
16. SIGNATURE OF Contractor
Corporations
The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President and
Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other persons may sign for
the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution of the corporate board of
directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Pannerships
The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The proposal
must be signed by all panners comprising the partnership unless proof in the form of a certified copy
of a certificate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner is presented to the City
CIerk, in which case the general partner may sign.
Joint Ventures
Proposals submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer.
Individuals
Proposals 'submitted by individuals must be signed by the Contractor, unless an up-to-date power of
attorney is on file in the City Clerk's office, in which case said person may sign for the individual.
The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition, however,
where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature.
17. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES
Whenever Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens
to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
18. BOOKS AND RECORDS
CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the
performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any
authorized representative of the CITY.
19. UTII .ITY LOCATION
CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California
Government Code Section 4215.
20. RF. GIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS
CONTRACTOR agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with
Government Code Section 4216.2.
21. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/CONDITIONS
CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed plan for worker protection during the excavation of trenches
required by the scope of the work in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705.
A,
CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing the condition, notify CITY in writing as
soon as Contractor, or any of Contractor's sub-contractors, agents, or employees have
knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following
conditions:
r~hm~byb%a~r, nd~-d~7-8.rfp
The presence of any material that the Contractor believes is hazardous waste,
as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code:
Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those
indicated in the specifications; or
Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different
materially for those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as
inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract.
Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken, Contractor
shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent the hazardous waste
or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person.
C,
CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If CITY, through, and in
the exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ,
or do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the
Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, then
CITY shall issue a change order.
In the event of a dispute between CITY and Contractor as to whether the conditions
materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or part of the work,
Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date, and shall
proceed with all work to be performed under the contract. Contractor shall retain any
and all rights which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the
parties.
22. INSPECTION
The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by authorized CITY personnel. All inspections
and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be
subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections.
Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time at~er completion of the work.
23. DISCRIMINATION
CON'Ilt~CTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment
practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
24. GOVERNING LAW
This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of
California. Venue shall be the County of Riverside. In the event litigation is commenced by either
party with respect to this contract, the prevailing party in such litigation, as determined by the Court,
shall be entitled to reasonable attorney t~es.
25. V~,ITTEN NOTICE
Any written notice required to be given in any part of ~he Contract Documents shall be performed
by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor
as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties h~eto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
reek, City Clerk
EXHIBIT 1
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
PoI0
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
Site Name Monthly Price
Veterans Park $1,550.00
Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00
Calle Aragon Park $ 250.00
Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00
Loma Linda Park $ 707.00
Rivenon Park $1,617.00
John Magee Park $ 310.00
Voorburg Park $
Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00
Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00
Temecula Duck Pond $1.1 ~5.00
Rotary Park $ ~30.00
Nakayama Park $ 125.00
Annual Price
~8,600.00
$ 9,600.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 8,484.00
$1_9,4o4.oo
$ 3,720.00
$
$ 9,744.00
$ 9,384.00
$ 3,600.00
$ 1,500.00
TOTAL $8,961.00 $107,532.00
EXHIBIT 2
City of Tcmccula
R. equest for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(NORTH)
Site #
S-I
S-2
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-9
S-IO
S-11
S-14
S-15
Site Name
Saddlewood/Paviilion Point
Winchester Creek I and II
Signet Series
Woodcrest Country
Ridgeview
Rancho Solana
Martinique
Meadowview Estates
Mirada
Barclay Estates
Monthly Price
S
$ 1,9fl2,00
$ 2,534.00
$ 559.OO
$ 773.0O
$ 355.OO
$ 150.O0
$ 394.00
$ 344.O0
Annual Price
$ ~,af, a O0
$ 14,dP4,C~
$ 3(],401~.O0
$ 6.708.00
$ 9,276.00
$ q ,560.00
S 4.260.00
$ 1,800,00
S 4,77A.(]0
$ 4.]m.00
TOTAL
$ 8.811.00
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1# 1998 by
and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Fxcel
Landscape. Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
purposes:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
agreement for landscape maintenance services within the CITY's green belts,
landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, _parks and rights-of-way.
("Agreement").
Amendment.
The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
2. Exhibit 1 to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 1A is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment
"A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though
set forth in full.
3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
be executed the day and year first above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
BY:
Ronaid E. Bradley, City r
ATTEST:
BY:
~o~ Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
~Pe r M. Thorson, City Attorney
te
CONTRACTOR
Fxcel Landscape. Inc.
TITLE:
ATTACHMENT "A"
EXHIBIT 1A
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-10
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
SS-1
Site Name
Veterans Park ~'
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Calle Aragon Park
Bahia Vista Park
Loma Linda Park
Riverton Park
John Magee Park
Voorburg Park
Nicolas Road Park
Butterfield Stage Park
Temecula Duck Pond
Rotary Park
Nakayama Park
Via Eduardo Streetscape
Monthly Price Annual Price
1,550.00 $ 18.600.00
800.00 9.600.00
250.00 3.000.00
250.00 3.000.00
707.00 8.484.00
1,617.00 19.404.00
310.00 3.770.00
303.00 3.636.00
812.00 9.744.00
789.00 9.384,00
1.155.00 13.860.00
300.00 3.600.00
175.00 1,500.00
106.00 1.272.00
TOTAL
$9.067.00 $108.804.00
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
DATE:
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
July 14, 1998
SUBJECT:
Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for
FY 1998-99
PREPARED BY:
Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Approve contract amendment of $1,272 with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide
landscape maintenance services for the Via Eduardo Street Scape (SS-1) for FY1998-
99.
Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $214,560 to cover FY1998-99
contract with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for
neighborhood parks/streetscapes and slopes (north).
BACKGROUND: On June 24, 1997, the Temecula Community Services District Board
of Directors awarded a two year (24 month) contract to Excel Landscape Maintenance, Inc.,
to provide landscape maintenance services for FY1997-98 and FY1998-99. Funds were
authorized for expenditure at that time for the contract period FY1997-98. The Temecula
Community Services Department (TCSD) recommends adding the maintenance of the Via
Eduardo Streetscape to the landscape maintenance contract with Excel Landscape Inc. This
area (approximately 17,000 square feet) is located on Via Eduardo at Pala Road. This area was
previously unimproved public right-of-way which has recently been landscaped and irrigated and
now needs to be maintained. The new annual cost for neighborhood parks/street scape is
$108,804 with the balance of $105,756 for slopes for a total annual contract amount for all
services is $214,560.
FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Excel Landscape, Inc., for FY1998-
99, including the additional maintenance area, is $214,560. Sufficient funds are available in
the TCSD Annual Operating Budget for FY1998-99 in accounts 190-180-999-5415, 190-199-
999-5415 and 193-180-999-5415.
R:~'ringk~agenda.rpt\excc198
MINUTE ACTION OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
DATE: July 15, 1998
TO:
Herman Parker, Director of Community Services
MEETING OF: July 14, 1998
AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER:
CSD Item No.6
SUBJECT:
land.~cape Maintenance Contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. for FY 1998-
99
The motion was made by Directc~ Lindemans, seconded by Director Roberrs to approve
staff recommendation.
6.1
Approve contract amendmere of $1,272 with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide
landscape maintenance services for the Via Eduardo Street Scape (SS-1) for FY
1998-99;
6.2
Authorize the expenditure of funds in the mount of $214,560 to cover FY 1998-99
contract with Excel Landscape, Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for
neighborhood parks/streerscapes and slopes (north).
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts,
Stone
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary for the Temecula Community Services District of the City of
Temeeula, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury, the foregoing to be the
official action taken by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at
the above meeting.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14th day of July, 1998.
/~ye~l
[SEAL]
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 11,
1998 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and
Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants 'and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts,
landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way.
("Agreement").
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth
in this Amendment.
2. Exhibits 3, 4, 5, and 6 to the Agreement are hereby added to the
Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms
and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The
Agreement will be terminated effective July 1, 1999.
I~ : ~ U S E P t C ON'rJ~ C"'FHt.,tD EX CEL W~ D
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tile parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
J Alfaro
Temecuia Community Services District
Attest:
~Wr~J°ne~C
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
R:IRUSEPtCONTI~C'FL4MDEXCEL WPD
ATTACHMENT A
R :tR US E P ~ C O NTP,.A CTtA MD ~ C FL WP D
Site #
S-3a
S-3b
S-4
S-8
S-12
S-13
S-16
EXHIBIT 3
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
Site Name
Rancho Highlands
Rancho Highlands-Ynez Road Slope
The Vineyards
The Villages A & B
Vintage Hills
Presley (Viranda, Country Glen/
79 South, Bridlevale)
Tradewinds
Monthly Price Annual Price
$ 515.00 $ 6.180.00
1 .O00.00 1 ~.O00.00
755'.00 3.060.00
4.734.00 56,808.00
4.600.00 55. :200.00
1.408.00 16.896.00
863.00 10.356.00
TOTAL
$13.375.00 ,~160.500.00
orlzeYd~Sig~t ~ure
R .. tR U,SEPX CONTRA C'['~-I MDF. XCI.'L WPD
EXHIBIT 4
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
M-3
M-4
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site Name
Rancho California Road Median
Ynez Road Median =-
Butterfield Stage Road Median
Marganta Road Median
Monthly Price
$ 500.00
$ l~.O0
s lo3,oo
Annual Price
S 4,fill.00
$ 6,000.00
$1,800.00
S 1.7~10.00
TOTAL
67
EXHIBIT 5
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
P-8 (SP-4)
Site Name
Rancho California Sports Park
Paloma Del Sol Park _-
Pala Commumty Park
Kent H. intergardt Park
Monthly Price
$ 9,294.00
$ 3,592.00
$ 2.333.00
$ 3.359.00
Annual Price
$lll ,528.00
S 4t,l~4_Cfi
S 27,996.O3
TOTAL
$18,578.00
hotureu
68
EXHIBIT 6
City of Temecula
Kequest for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
F-I
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
Site Name
Community Recreation Center
Senior Center
City Hall/Maintenance Facility
Temecula Commumty Center
Fire Station #84
Old Town Parking Lot
Monthly Price
$1,444.00
$ 361.00
$ 541.00
s ].93.00
$ ~=~0.00
S 250.00
Atmual Price
17,328.00
4,332.00
6,492.00
2.316.00
3.000.00
TOTAL
3,369.00
69
hatur'c/E'(
190-182-999-5415
190-184-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
340-199-701-5414
ATTACHMENTS:
Amendment
Letter of Resignation from California Landscape Maintenance, Inc.
MINUTE ACTION OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF
THE CITY' OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
DATE: July 29, 1998
TO:
Herman Parker, Director of Community Services
MEETING OF: July 28, 1998
AGENDA
ITEM NUMBER:
CSD Item No.3
SUBJECT:
Landscape Maintenance Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape for
FY1998-99
The motion was made by DirectOr Robens, seconded by Director Ford to approve staff
recommendation.
3.1
Approve a contract amendment in the amount of $389,157 with Excel Landscape
to provide landscape maintenance services for additional landscaped areas for
FY1998-99.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Lindemans
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
L Susan W. Jones, Secretary for the Temecula Community Services District of the City of
Temecula, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury, the foregoing to be the
official action taken by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at
the above meeting.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 28th day of July, 1998.
[SEAL]
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as o: January 1 I,
1999 by and between the Temecula_Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way ("Agreement").
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 1A to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement
and in its place a new Exhibit 1 B is added to the Agreement as set
forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
Jo~e./A!faro
Of Nner
'
Te~~y Services District
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager
Attest:
1Jones,
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT "A'
EXHIBIT 1B
(As amended January 11, 1999)
City of Temecuia
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOnD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-IO
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-15
SS-1
Site Name Monthly Price
Veterans Park $ 1,550.00
Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00
Calle Aragon Park $ 250.00
Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00
Loma Linda Park $ 707.00
Riverton Park $ 1,617.00
John Magee Park $ 310.00
Voorburg Park $ 303.00
Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00
Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00
Temecula Duck Pond $ 1,155.00
Rotary Park $ 300.00
Nakayama Park $ 125.00
Winchester Creek Park ~ 1,568.00
Via Eduardo Streetscape $ 106.00
Annual Price
$18.600.00
$ 9,600.00
~ 3.000.00
$ 3,000.00
~ 8.484.00
$19.404.00
$ 3,720.00
$ 3.636.00
$ 9,744.00
$ 9.384.00
$13,860.00
$ 3,600.00
$ 1,500.00
~ 18.816.00
$ 1,272.00
TOTAL
10,635.00 9127,620.00
Authorized Signature
AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 22,
1999 by and between the Temecula.,Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on
July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, and January 11, 1999. The June
24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the
Agreement.
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 4 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 4A will be added to the Agreement as set
forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full· The cost for this
new site will be $100.00 per month·
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
R:LEIARRINGKtAGENDA,RP~EXCEL AMENDMENT 4,4 FY 98-99. DOC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
J I
her
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
R:W,~RRJNGKL, IGEND,4.RPTiF_.XCEL ,.B'fF..NDMENT 4..4 FY 98-99.DOC
ATTACHMENT "A"
R:~HtlRRINGKL,IGL:ND..I.RPT~F_.,YCEL ,~I/vI~'NDMENT 4.~ FY 98-99.DOC
E,V,J=U/iIT 4A
(As amended March 22, 1999)
City of Temecula
PHcing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site #
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
*M-5
Site Name ..- Monthly Price
Rancho California Road Median $ 400.00
Ynez Road Median $ 500.00
Butterfield Stage Road Median $ 150.00
Margarita Road Median $ 100.00
Margarita Road Median at 79 South $ 100.00
Annual Price
$ 4,800.00
$ 6,000.00
$ 1,800.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,200.00
* New Site
TOTAL
$1,250.00 915,000.00
~Sig ture~
R:IttARPJNGKIAG_FNDA.RP~F_..XCL;'L tU~,IENDME'NT ~IA FY 98-99. DOC
AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 5,
1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on
July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999 and March 22,
1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be
known as the Agreement.
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 1 B to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 1 C is added to the Agreement as set forth on
Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
Teme I .:~ty Services District
~elson, Acting City Manager
Attest:
Susan W.
City C/erk JoneS, CMC
Approved as to form:
Pet~
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT "A"
AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 15,
1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on
July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999, March 22,
1999 and April 1, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as
amended, shall be known as the Agreement.
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 5 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 5A will be added to the Agreement as set
forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
Attest:
~~~- k. ,'~
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
:::~o~-.~
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT "A"
EXHIBIT ~A
(As amended April 15, 1999)
City of Temecula
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4 (P-8)
*SP-5
Site Name _,
Rancho California Sports Park
Paloma Del Sol Park
Pala Community Park
Kent Hintergardt Park
Margarita Community Park
Monthly Price Annual Price
9,294.00 $111,528.00
3,592.00 $ 43,104.00
2,333.00 $ 27,996.00
3,359.00 $ 40,308.00
3,147.00 $ 37,764.00
* New Site
TOTAL
21,725.00 $260,700.00
ITEM 10
APPROVA~/.~C,
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager
DATE: June 22, 1999
SUBJECT:
Contract Extension for the Professional Services Agreement to Prepare the Southside
Specific Plan
Prepared By:
Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Contract Amendment Number 1 with RBF extending the performance pedod to June 30,
2000.
BACKGROUND:
In 1997 the City of Temecula entered into an agreement with Urban Design Studio (now part of RBF)
to prepare a specific plan for the Front Street corridor south of Old Town. Work commenced on this
project in the summer of 1997 and continued into the spdng of 1998. At that time, the City staff
person responsible for the project left the City. The subsequent heavy workload in both Current and
Long Range Planning programs left staff dealing with higher pdodty projects which resulted in the
Southside Specific Plan not receiving the attention necessary to meet the contract timeline. This
proposed extension would allow sufficient time for staff and the consultant to finalize the proposed
Specific Plan and take it through the public headng process. A copy of the Extension Agreement
is included as Attachment No. 1.
FISCALIMPACT:
There is currently an existing contract and purchase order in effect for this project in the amount of
$61,700. No additional funds are being requested for this project.
Attachments:
Professional Services Agreement Extension between the City of Temecula and Urban Design
Studio (now a part of RBF) - Page 2
R:XI-IO GAHD\southsido sp exterudon staff r~port-cc .doc
1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXTENSION
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND RBF
~\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING\HOGAND~southsido sp extension staff report-cc.doc
2
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT NO. 97-83
The Agreement dated June 10, 1997 between the City of Temecula and RBF, a successor in interest
to Urban Design Studio, (heroin referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:
Section 1.
The Term of this Agreement is extended to June 30, 2000.
Section 2.
All other Terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, without
diminishment, alteration or modification, except as se~ forth in Section 1 herein.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Date and Year shown below:
CONSULTANT
By: By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey
ATI'EST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:~hogand\southside ap extension staff repo~*cc.doc
ITEM 11
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City ManagedCity Council
~Villiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 22,1999
Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Bridge Widening and Northbound
Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW95-12 - Reduction in Retention Withheld
from Contractor
PREPARED BY:
Steven W. Beswick, Associate Engineer
Julie Dauer, CIP Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a reduction in the retention amount
held from Riverside Construction Company from ten percent (10%) to five percent (5%) for the
Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 - Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp
Improvements, Project No. PW95-12.
BACKGROUND: On October 28, 1997, a contract was awarded to Riverside
Construction Company for the construction of the Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 -
Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvement, Project No. PW95-12. During the
construction period Riverside Construction Company submitted monthly progress payment
applications equal to 90 percent of the value of work completed in accordance with the contract
documents. A retention of 10 percent is therefore withheld from the general contractor's
progress payments to provide an amount of money that can be available to satisfy lien claims
from subcontractors or suppliers and as a means of holding funds that may be utilized to
complete the project in case of default.
However, Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and
Section 9203 of the Public Contracts Code, allows for a reduction in the retention to 5% if the
agency deems that progress has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete.
Since Riverside Construction Company has now completed well over 50% of the project, they
are requesting a reduction in the retention amount being withheld to 5%. A reduction at this
point in the project would mean a release of half the funds now being held as retention, which
would leave a balance of $241,149.81.
We have reviewed the progress of the work and have found it to be satisfactory for the purposes
of reducing the retention and that 5% will be adequate to address potential claims or default and
recommend that Riverside's request be granted.
r:~agdrpt\99\O622\PW95-12ret/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT: The City has retained $482,299.61 from progress payments submitted to
date. A reduction to 5 percent will result in releasing $241,149.81 to Riverside Construction
Company. A 5 percent retention will also be held from any future progress payments. At the
end of the project all retention being held by the City will be released on or about 35 days after
the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Request from Riverside Construction Company
r:~agdrpt\99~622~PW95-12ret/ajp
i909) 682-8308 CALIF. STATE
(909) 682-8350 (FAX) LICENSE NO, 266222
RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS
111 NO. MAIN STREET -- P. O. BOX 1146
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502-1148
Ma3, 18.1999
~,~" Steve a ......:..t.
C it>. of Temecula
Public Works
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Rancho Cal ifi.}rnia Rd. - remecula
Contract No. PW 95-12
Dear Mr. Beswick-
Respectt~lly. we hereby request that the retention held on this job be reduced 50% to a
figure o,~' 5% on the c::,ntract. We make our request in accordance witl': the contract
documents [Public Contract Code] and the fhct that our progress has been satisfactory and
is nearlv complete.
We ask that you have the proper authorities present our request on our behalf at the ver?
next City Council meeting.
Sincerely.
_--.~/:, ,~ //,.
Julie Greenhaw
Accounting Manager
ITEM 12
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
/~.,~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 22,1999
SUBJECT:
Parcel Map No. 28962 located north of Santiago Road, south of Estero Road
and east of Ormsby Road
PREPARED BY: onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDAT cel Map No. 28962 in conformance with
the approved Conditions of Approval
BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 28962 was approved by the City of
Temecula Planning Manager, Debbie Ubnoske, on October 28, 1998 and expiration date being
October 28, 2000. The Developer, Pacific Capital Investments, Ltd., has met all of the Conditions
of Approval.
Parcel Map No. 28962 is a two (2) parcel residential subdivision, of 2.51 gross acres, located north
of Santiago Road, south of Estero Road and east of Ormsby Road. This site is currently vacant.
The Developer has completed all its offsite requirements and has placed all its required monuments
per the Parcel Map. The Department of Public Works has accepted the offsite improvements and
monument placement therefore the Developer is not required to place securities for improvements.
The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 28962:
Public Facilities Development Impact Fee is due prior to issuance of a building permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Vicinity Map
Parcel Map No. 28962
r:~agdrpt\99\0622~tr28962.map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
PARCEL MAP NO. 28962
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Public Facilities Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
r:~agdrpt~99\0622\tr28962.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 28962
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
DATE: June 22, 1999
MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Water $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Sewer $ 0.00 $ 0.00
TOTAL $ 0.00 $ 0.00
SECURITY
$ 0.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ PAID
$ TBD*
$ 56.00
$ 4.00
$ 790.00
$ 250.00
$ 1,100.00
$ 0.00
r:~agdrpt~g~)622~tr28962.map
TO ~N~ COUNTteY
TO MUteYel~=rA
TO A~~
TO SAN DIEGO
~ClNITY MAP
ne eo ~
/
ITEM 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 22, 1999
SUBJECT:
Tract Map No. 23143-2, Located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield
Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road
PREPARED BY: ~onald J. Parks Deputy Director of Public Works
lement M. Jim~nez, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve:
1. Tract Map No. 23143-2 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval
2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and
Matedal Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143-2 was originally approved by
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 1988. The map has been extended three
times. The Second Extension of Time was approved on July 16, 1992 by the Planning Director. The
Third Extension of Time was approved September 17, 1998 by the Planning Director, expiration date
being August 16, 1999. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval.
Tract Map No. 23143-2 is a sixty-four (64) lot single family residential subdivision with eight open
space lots. The tract is located South of Pauba Road, East of Bufferfield Stage Road, and North of
De Portola Road. The site is currently undeveloped.
Crowne Hill Ddve runs through Tract Map No. 23143-2, Tract Map No. 23143-3, and Tract Map No.
23143-4. A separate bond for the construction of Crowne Hill Drive in the amount of $599,826 has
been posted as security for street improvements and will not be released until all improvements have
been constructed. Improvements to Crowne Hill Ddve are an Acquisition Project as part of
Assessment District No. 159.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23143-2:
Development Impact Fee due pdor to issuance of a building permit.
r:~agdrptLqg~0622~tr23143-2.rnap
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Fees & Securities Report
3. Project Vicinity Map
4. Tract Map No. 23143-2
r:~agdrpt%99~0622W23143-2.rnap
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 23143-2
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
r:%agdrpt%99%0622V. r23143-2.map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 23143-2
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 637,500
Water $ 132,500
Sewer $ 174,500
TOTAL $ 944,500
DATE: June 22, 1999
MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY
$
$
$
$
318,750
66,250
87,250
472,250
$ 15,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Stdping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 173.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,190.00
$ 750.00
$ 3,121.00
$ 0.00
r:~gdrptLq9~"22%tr23143-2.map
TRACT
23143-
VICINITY
MAP
NO T .TO SCALE
I .~',~r I
I ~ I
I I
I /
ITEM 14
-
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
/'~,~(William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 22, 1999
SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 23143-3, Located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield
Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road
PREPARED
BY: Ronald J Parks Deputy Director of Public Works
lement ~. Jim;~nez, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve:
1. Tract Map No. 23143-3 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval
2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and
Material Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143-3 was originally approved by
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 1988. The map has been extended three
times. The Second Extension of Time was approved on July 16, 1992 by the Planning Director. The
Third Extension of Time was approved September 17, 1998 by the Planning Director, expiration date
being August 16, 1999. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval.
Final Tract Map No. 23143-3 is a one hundred five (105) lot single family residential subdivision with
nine open space lots. The tract is located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and
North of De Portola Road. The site is currently undeveloped.
Crowne Hill Ddve runs through Tract Map No. 23143-2, Tract Map No. 23143-3, and Tract Map No.
23143-4. A separate bond for the construction of Crowne Hill Drive in the amount of $599,826 has
been posted as security for street improvements and will not be released until all improvements have
been constructed. Improvements to Crowne Hill Drive are an Acquisition Project as part of
Assessment District No. 159.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23143-3:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit.
r:~agclrpt%gO%0622VJ~23143-3 .map
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Fees & Securities Report
3. Project Vicinity Map
4. Tract Map No. 23143-3
r:~agdrpt~99~0622~tr23143-3.map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 23143-3
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
r:%agdrpt'~99',0622~tr23143-3,map
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 23143-3
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 717,000
Water $ 175,500
Sewer $ 239,000
TOTAL $ 1,131,150
DATE: June 22, 1999
MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY
$
$
$
$
358,500 -
87,750 -
119,500 -
565,750 $ 21,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Stdping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 215.00
$ 8.00
$ 3,030.00
$ 1,050.00
$ 4,303.00
$ 0.00
r:~agdrpt~99~0622~r23143-3.map
,
TRACT 23143
3
W'CINITY..
MAP
SITE
NO T ...TO SCALE
,/
$H(ET 7 OF 7 SHEETS
DATA TABLE
ENGINEER'S NOTES
EASEMENT NOTES
2. I'~T PCW'rK)N S~OWN AS A °I~MANO~ ~
CGqT~UOUS Oaee[RSH~ AT I~[ T~ OF
78
ITEM 15
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City ManagedCity Council
/}~/.~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 22, 1999
SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 23143-4, Located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield
Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road
PREPARED BY: ~ onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
lement M. Jimenez, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve:
1. Tract Map No. 23143-4 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval
2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and
Matedal Bond and Monument Bond as secudty for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143-4 was originally approved by
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 1988. The map has been extended three
times. The Second Extension of Time was approved on July 16, 1992 by the Planning Director. The
Third Extension of Time was approved September 17, 1998 by the Planning Director, expiration date
being August 16, 1999. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval.
Final Tract Map No. 23143-4 is an eighty (80) lot single family residential subdivision with seven
open spaca lots. The tract is located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and
North of De Portola Road. The site is currently undeveloped.
Crowne Hill Drive runs through Tract Map No. 23143-2, Tract Map No. 23143-3, and Tract Map No.
23143-4. A separate bond for the construction of Crowne Hill Ddve in the amount of $599,826 has
been posted as security for street improvements and will not be released until all improvements have
been constructed. Improvements to Crowne Hill Drive are an Acquisition Project as part of
Assessment District No. 159.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23143-4:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of a building permit.
r:~gclrp{Lqg~0622~r23143-4.map
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Tract Map No. 23143-4
r:~.gdrpt%99~0622~tr23143--4.map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 231434
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
r:~agdrl~gg~"22~r23143-4.rnap
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 23143-4
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 884,500
Water $ 218,000
Sewer $ 236,500
TOTAL $ 1,339,000
DATE: June 22, 1999
MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT
SECURITY SECURITY
$ 442,250
$ 109,000
$ 118,250
$ 669,500 $ 23,000
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Stdping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
*To Be Determined.
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ TBD*
$ 188.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,490.00
$ 1,150.00
$ 3,836.00
$ 0.00
4
r:~agclrptLqg~0622~23143-4.map
TR ACT 23143
4
VICINITY MAP
NiP T TO SCALE'.' ..
: , . .. :; ,
·
:
I:..,
' ~ ~ .~ .
~ ~ ! ~ . ,:-
~
. . . . ... :. .. :.. :: '..:'~ .:..~ ~'
.... ,:.~' .. ~j." ..." ::. ~" ':" · '.. "" .'. '}." .' '.'" i. ;.' L..'
...... ~.
°m II
!:.-...',.
· ,.6,', .-'.,.:.',.
.;. -:.;~-
· ......, ..: ·
, L- ...,
.... ~..,-:--:~,~
.~" '.' ";~?.,;, '.,2,',.~,
..... <": ,":":¢~'72'.'.'i
, ,.' ' . - .?,..
.-... ..- ;~,~;.,.~.
ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
,/~Jj~,william G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 22, 1999
Summarily Vacate Portion of Public Streets in Parcel Map No.
(Northeast corner of Solana Way at Margadta Road)
20278
BY'~ Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director
PREPARED ~Y,L, Ibert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING
PORTIONS OF SOLANA WAY AND MARGARITA
ROAD IN PARCEL MAP NO. 20278.
BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No.
3334 on July 6, 1965, including acceptance of offers of dedication for street purposes, said
offers including Solana Way (formerly La Serena Way) and Margarita Road (formerly North
General Kearny Road) along the frontage of Lot 38 of said tract. Said Lot 38 was then
resubdivided as Parcel Map No. 20278, approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner
on behalf of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and offers of dedication to public use
for street and public utility purposes accepted at map approval date of February 20, 1985.
The developer of the Solana Ridge Development, A.J. Spanos, has requested the vacation of
certain portions of the fronting streets as the right of way widths required at the time of the
original subdivisions have since been reduced by the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation
Element from 11 O-feet width to 88-feet width. This results in a reduction in half-street width of
11-feet along the Solana Way frontage. The effect of the reduction proposed in this request for
street vacation does not reduce the Margarita Road right of way width. The improved width
along both frontages meets City improvement standards.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACH M E N TS:
1. Resolution No. 99-
2, Location Map
with Exhibits "A" and "B"
R:~agdrpt~99~0622\vacsolanawy
1
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA SUMMARILY VACATING
PORTIONS OF SOLANA WAY AND MARGARITA
ROAD IN PARCEL MAP NO. 20278.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
declare as follows:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
(a)
That the City Council intends to summarily vacate portions of Lots "D" and "E" (Solana
Way ) and a portion of Lot "C" (Margarita Road) as these areas are described on
Exhibits "A" and "B", in Parcel Map No. 20278, said portions of streets being previously
dedicated as Lot "A" (North General Keamy Road) and Lot "B" (La Serena Way) in
Tract Map No. 3334because this portion of right-of-way is no longer needed for street or
highway purposes.
(b)
That the subject portions of Lots "C", "D", and "E" to be vacated are consistent with the
General Plan Circulation Element and provide the required right of widths required
thereby:
(C)
The right-of-way to be vacated by this resolution is excess right-of-way of a street not
required for street or highway purposes.
(d)
This vacation is made pursuant to Section 8330 to 8336 of the Streets and Highways
Code.
(e) There are no public utility easements or facilities which will be affected by this vacation.
Section 2. The portions of Lots "A", "B", and "C" described in Exhibits "A" and "B"
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference are hereby vacated and
from and after the date of this Resolution is recorded, these portions of said Lots "A", "B", and
"C" shall no longer constitute streets and public utility easements or right of way of the City of
Temecula and shall revert to the property owner.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and shall cause
a certified copy of the Resolution to be recorded pursuant to Streets and Highways Code
Section 8336.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of June 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R :\agdrptLq9~O622\vacsolanawy
2
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
meeting thereof held on the 22" day of June 1999, by the following vote:
Temecula at a regular d
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R :\agdrpt~99~O622\vacsolanawy
3
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
STREET VACATION
Those portions of Solaria Way and Margarita Road, as shown as Lots "C","D" and "E" on Parcel
Map 20278, on file in Book 127, Pages 35 and 36, of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County,
State of California, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most Northerly comer of said Lot "E" ;
THENCE, along the Northeasterly line of said Lot "E", South 31 ° 59' 47" East, 11.00 feet;
THENCE, parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Lots "D" and "E", South 58°00'13" West,
652.16 feet;
THENCE, North 72° 57' 48" West, 35.01 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent 1945.00 foot
radius curve, concave Northeasterly, having a radial bearing of South 61 ° 35' 14" West;
THENCE, Northwesterly, along the are of said curve, through a central angle of 0° 16' 07", a
distance of 9.12 feet to the Northerly line of said Lot "C";
THENCE, along said Northerly line of Lot "C", South 75° 04" 12" East, 33.60 feet to said
Northwesterly line of said Lot "D";
THENCE, along said Northwesterly line of said Lots "D" and "E", North 58° 00' 13" East,
651.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described parcel contains 7416 square feet, more or less.
Lice~Eipires: 9-30-00
Date:
903 mrgea, lgl
~R~EL 2
P~OEL
4
A PORT J ON OF
PARO L 3 '~ ,
, ",N,.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
No. DIRECTION DISTANCE
LI N 31'59'47' W I1.00
L2 N 72'57'48' W 35.01
L3 N 75' 04' 12' W 33.60
No. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH
CI 0'16'07" 1945.00 9.12
SCALE I"=100
EXHIBIT 'B'
RIGHT OF WAY VACATION
/ usr / pr o J dO f o/ r , gr'p l d,lZ~O~ l gO 3pl t 4.d(Jn
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
3050 CHICAGO AVE.. SUITE 100, RIVERSi0E. CA 92507
SCALE I'=100 ( 0ATE JULY 15, 1997
PLOT 0ATEm 18-AUG-1997 JN 12903
II
e#RCe~ ·
Parcel Map No. 20278
Location Ma-,
.,
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 17
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
cr'l-Y ATT(~)RPNPERYOVAL~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
/'k~lliam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 22, 1999
"All-Way Stop" - Margarita Road at DePortola Road
PREPARED BY: Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- Traffic
RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City
Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN "ALL-WAY STOP"
INTERSECTION AT MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLA
ROAD
BACKGROUND: During an evaluation of traffic safety at various locations within the
City, it was determined that the intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola Road had not
been evaluated for installation of a traffic signal or an "All-Way Stop". Due to an increasing
traffic volume on Margadta Road and DePortola Road, as a result of various developments in
the southeast quadrant of the City, a study of this intersection was appropriate.
Currently, the intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola Road is controlled by a two-way
stop on DePortola Road therefore, traffic on Margarita Road is not required to stop. A
comprehensive study was conducted to determine if the existing traffic controls were adequate
for the conditions. This study revealed that based on the existing traffic volumes and accident
history, both a traffic signal and an "All-Way Stop" is currently warranted at this intersection.
Based on the results of the study, staff recommended that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
consider establishing an "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola
Road. This recommendation was presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at their
May 13, 1999 regular meeting.
After reviewing the staff report, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission voted unanimously to
recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing an "All-Way Stop" at the
intersection of Margarita Road and DePortola Road. Replacement of the proposed "All-Way
Stop" signs with a traffic signal will be considered as a part of the Capital Improvement
Program.
- 1 - R:~AGDRPt~99~0622~stopmargdeportola
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department
Account No. 001-164-601-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-601-5410.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 99-
2. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
3. Exhibit "B" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report
Signs
- 2 - R:~AGDRPt~9~0622~stopmargdeportola
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN "ALL-WAY STOP"
INTERSECTION AT MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLA
ROAD
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council has considered the facts justifying the need for the stop signs
proposed for the location described in this resolution. The City Council hereby finds and
determines that installation of the stop signs pursuant to this resolution will enhance the public
health safety and general welfare at this location and the proposed stop signs will not create any
adverse conditions in the area.
Section 2. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following
"ALL-WAY STOP" location is hereby established in the City of Temecula.
Margarita Road and De Portola Road
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 22"d day of June, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
- 3 - R:~AGDRPt~99\0622~stopmargdeportola
(SEAL)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
held on the 22" day of June, 1999, by the following
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof d
vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
- 4 - R:~AGDRPt~99~0622~stopmargdeportola
EXHIBIT "A" - LOCATION MAP
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
May 13, 1999
Item 2
Installation of "Multi-Way Stop" - Margarita Road at De Portola Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing
a "Multi-Way Stop" at the intersection of Margarita Road and De Portola Road.
BACKGROUND:
A review of the City's Traffic Signal Priority List revealed that the intersection of Margarita Road at De
Portola Road did not appear on the list of intersections evaluated for potential traffic signal installation. An
evaluation of traffic conditions has been performed to deEErmine if this intersection satisfies the minimum
warrant criteria for the installation of traffic signals.
Margarita Road is identified on the City's Circulation Element as an 86 foot wide four lane Arterial Highway
with a 14-foot wide raised median. Currently, Margarita Road at De Portola Road is 44 feet wide with one
travel lane in each direction. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH on Margarita Road.
De Portola Road, west of Margarita Road is identified on the City's Circulation Element as a 64 foot wide four
lane Secondary Highway. East of Margarita Road, De Portola Road is identified as a 76 foot wide four lane
Major Highway with a 12-foot wide raised median. Currently, De Portola Road is 40 feet wide with one
travel lane in each direction. The speed limit is posted at 50 MPH on De Portola Road. "Stop" signs on De
Portola Road control the intersection.
The justification for the installation of a traffic signal at an intersection is based on a series of eleven (11)
warrants that have been established by Caltrans. Satisfying any one of these warrants, or a combination of
warrants, could be justification for the installation of a traffic signal. These warrants are contained in the
Caltrans Traffic Manual that has been adopted by the City of Temecula as a guideline to be used in the
evaluation and installation of various traffic control devices, including traffic signals and "Stop" signs.
The traffic signal warrant analysis performed for the intersection of Margarita Road at De Portola Road
indicates that all applicable warrants are satisfied one hundred percent (100%) and a traffic signal is justified
at this intersection. A copy of this analysis is included as Exhibit "B" .
r:\traffic\comrnissn\agendn\99\0513\margdepomtop/ajp
2.
3.
4.
5.
The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that under certain conditions where traffic signals are warranted and
urgently needed, multi-way stop controls may be used as an interim measure. There are four (4) criteria that
Caltrans has established for the evaluation of "Multi-Way Stop" signs. These criteria are as follows:
Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that
can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal
installations.
An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve (12) month
period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include
right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
Minimum Traffic Volumes
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least
500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day, and
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must
average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an average delay to
minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour,
but
C,
When the 85-percential approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour,
the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
4. School area traffic control recommendations/warrants.
The "Multi-Way Stop" warrant analysis indicates that all applicable warrants are satisfied one hundred percent
(100%) and "Multi-Way Stop" signs are justified at Margarita Road and De Portola Road. A copy of this
analysis is included as Exhibit "D" .
Since the intersection of Margarita Road at De Portola Road satisfies the criteria for installation of a traffic
signal, staff recommends the installation of "Multi-Way Stop" signs as an interim measure. Installation of a
signal at this intersection will be included in the five (5) year Capital Improvement Program for consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$500.00 for the installation of two (2) "Stop" signs and associated striping.
Attachment:
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Exhibit "C' - Collision Diagram
Exhibit "D" - "Multi-Way Stop" Warrant Analysis
Exhibit "E" - Traffic Signal Priority List
r: \traffic \commissnXag enda \99\0513 \margdeportstop/ajp
ITEM 18
APPROVAL
CiTY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR Of FINANC
CiTY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
./'~.William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 22,1999
Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Installation - Rancho
California Road at Via Las Colinas, Project No. PW97-29
PREPARED BY:
Brian Gulllot, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Accept the project "Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho California Road & Via Las Colinas",
Project No. PW97-29, as complete; and
File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and
,
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
Completion, if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND: On January 12, 1999, the City Council awarded a contract for the
project "Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho California Road & Via Las Colinas", Project PW97-
29 to DBX, Inc. of Temecula, California, in the amount of '~75,269.00. The project included
the installation of traffic signals and safety lighting at the subject location.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction
retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has
been recorded.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount for this project was $75,813.80. Contract Change Order
No. 1 was approved by the City Manager in the amount of $544.80. The project was funded by
Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds and Development Impact Fees (DIF).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
3. Contractor's Affidavit
r:~agdrpt\99\O622\pw97-29.acc
1
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula. CA 92589-9033
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR
RECORDER'S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to DBX, Inc. to perform the following
work of improvement:
Traffic Signal Installation
Rancho California Road at Via Los Colinas
Project No. PW97-29
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted
by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on June 22, 1999. That upon
said contract the Great American Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company
as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW 97-29.
6. The street address of said property is: Rancho California Road at Via Los Colinas
Dated at Temecula, California, this 22"" day of June, 1999.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
I, Susan W, Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty
of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this 22"d day of June, 1999.
Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk
BOND# 3972702
PREMIUM: INCLUD, ED IN
PERFORMANCE BOND
CITY OF TEMECULA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO. PW97- 29
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT RANCNO CALIFORNIA ROAD & VIA LAS COLINAS
KNOWALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT:
42066 AVENIDA ALVARADO, SUITE C
DBX, INCORPORATED TEMECULA, CA 92~90
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
CORPORATION , hereinafter called Principal. and
(fill in whether a Cori~oration, Partnership or individual)
P.O. BOX 5440
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ORANGE, CA 92863-5440 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURE'~'Y
hereinafter called SURETY. are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA.
hereinafter called OWNER. in the penal sum of SEVEN THOUSANp FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE
DOLLARS and THIRTY-EIGHT CENTS
($ 7,581,38 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than
ten percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of
the Contract, fo~ the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns. jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLtGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain
Contract with the OWNER, dated the 12..Z]L day of .TANUARY __, 19 99 , a copy of which is
hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW97-29, TRAFRC
SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT RANCH0 CALIFORNIA ROAD & VIA LAS COLINAS.
WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee
for the period of six (6) months after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER.
against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period;
and
WHEREAS. the said Contract has been completed, and was aDOroved on MAY 27 , 19 99.
NOW. THEREFORE. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from
the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall
disclose poor workmanship in the execQtion of said work, and the carrying out of the ter~ns of said
Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shall remain in full force and virtue. otherwise this instrument shall be void.
R:%CIP~PROJECTS%INVeT~PWi?-29~BIO-DOC
M/~INTENANCE BOND M- I
Signed and seated this 7TB day of JU~E
· 19 99.
(Seal)
SURETY GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
DAVID L. CULBERTSON
(Name)
ATTORNEY- IN-FACT
(Title)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M, T~orson, City Attorney
(Name)
President & Sec./Treas.
{Title)
By:
(Name)
(Title)
R:~.Clle~PROJECTS',PW97'~PW97-29~ID-OOc
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Riverside
On June 9, 1999 before me,
Date
personally appeared Jim Perry
Phyllissa G. Maynor, Notary Public
Name sod l~tle ol Officer (e.g., *Jane Doe, Nola~/Public")
Nl~ne~s) ol Signer(s)
personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personS)
whose name~) isJiH:~ subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he,~lg3PaliN.{~executed the
same in his/~j~(;~tj{ authorized capacity(lee), and that by
his/l~eifillX signature(~ on the instrument the person(~),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary PuDtic
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Jim PerrV
Signer's Name:
~ Individual
~ Corporate Officer
Title(s): President & Sec./~reas.
[] Partner -- [] Limited [] General
[] Attorney-in-Fact
~ Trustee
~ Guardian or Conservator
F7 Other: Top of thumb here
[] Individual
[] Corporate Officer
Title(s):
[] Partner- [] Limited [] General
[] Attorney-in-Fact
[] Trustee
r-I Guardian or Conservator
[]' Other: Top Of thumb here
Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing:
,'.. DBX, Inc.
1995 Nal~nal Nolan/Association · 8236 Rernrnet Ave., P.O. 8ox 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder CeM To41-Freo 1-800-876-6827
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
On 6-07-99 be fore me,
LEXIE SHERWOOD - NOTARY PUBLIC
personally appeared DAVID L. CUlaAERTSON personally
known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the
same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the
person acted, executed the instrument.
LexieSherwoocl
(3C~:JExl) July 27 2001
~_.-.,_ .... , .... ---_
OP TI ONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons
relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
MAINTENANCE BOND
T~TI, E OR TYPE OF ~
NITMBER OF PAGES 2
DATEOF~
6-07-99
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] PARTNER ( S )
[] OTHER:
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE (S)
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S)
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(S)
AIVERIC i INSURANCE COMPANY'
580 WALNUT STREET · CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202 · 513-369-5000 · FAX 513-723-2740
The number of persons authorized by
this power of attorney is not more than No. 013630
SIX POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized
and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint the person or persons named below
its true and lawful attorney-in-fact. for it and in its name, place and stead to execute in bchalf ot' the sa;d Company, as surety, any and all bonds,
undertakings and contracts ofsuretyship, or other written obligations in the nature thereof; provided that the liability of the said ~ompany on an~
such bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall not exceed the limit stated below.
Name Address Limit of Power
DAVID L. CULBERTSON DIANA LASKOWSKI ALL OF ALL
LINDA L. CULBERTSON KAREN CHANDLER ANAHEIM, UNLIMITED
CHARLES L. FLAKE R.A. COON CALIFORNIA
'Fhis Power of Attorney revokes all previous powers issued in behalf of the attorncy(s)-m-lact named above.
IN WI'FNESS WHEREOF thc GREAT AMERiCAN INSURANCE CON.I PANY has caused :hose presents to be signed and attested bv
its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this 2rid day of February ,1999
Attest GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
STATE OF OHIO. COUNTY OF HAMILTON -- ss:
On this 2rid day of February, ].999 , before me personally appeared DOUGLAS R. BOWEN. to me
known. being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resided in Cincinnati, Ohio, that he is the Vice President of the Bond Division of Great
American Insurance Company. the Company described in and which executed the above instrumenU that he knows the seal; that it was so affixed
by authority of his office under the By-Laws of said Company, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority.
This Power of ..\ttorncv is granted by authortry of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Great American
Insurance Company bv unarumous written consent dated March 1, 1993.
RESOLVED: That the Division President, the several Division Vice Presidents and Assistant Vice Presidents, or any one of them, be
and hereby is authorized. from tinle t o finie, to appoint one or more A ttorneys-ln-Fact to execute on behalfof the Company, as surety. any and all
bonds, undertakings and contrac,'s orsuretyship, or other written obl~ations in the nature thereo~' ,,o prescribe their respective du.ties and the
respective limits of their authority; and to revoke any such appointment at any time.
RESOLVED FUR THER: That the Company seal and the signature of any of the aforesaid officers and any Secretary or Assistant
Secretary of the Company may be affixed by Facsimile ro any power of attorney or certificate of either given For the execution of any bond,
undertaking, contract or surelyship, or other written obligation in the nature thereof, such signa lure an d seal when so used being hereby adop ted by
the Company as the original signature of such officer and the original seal of the Company, to be valid and binding upon the Company with the
same Force and effect as though manually affixed.
CERTIFICATION
I, RONALD C. HAYES, Assistant Secretary of Great American Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of
Attorney and the Resolutions of the Board of Directors of March 1, 1993 have not been revoked and are now in full force and effect.
Signed and sealed this 7TH day of JUNE
. 1999
S1029S (I Iz97)
~L'DiT BT; O' D'DD ; O;DOF~ ; CITT 9F TE~EEUL~- ~DTD~Z1O~ 1f 1
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW97-29
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLA T!ON
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD A T VIA i. AS COLINAS
This is to certify that DBX, Inc. . {hereinafter the
"CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula. under o~th, that he/she/it has paid in full for
all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment. and all other bills contracted for by the
CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in
contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the
building, erection, construction, or repair of ~ha~ certain worl< of improvement known as PROJECT
NO. PW97-29, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT VIA LAS
COLINAS, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as
follows:
Traffic Signal Installation at Rancho Ca. Rd. & Via Las Colinas
INSERT 'fffl'~: Oi::'WORK HERE
The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or ctaims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any
unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR.
Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby
disputes the following amounts:
Description
Dollar Amount to Dispute
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and
acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the CiTy, and each of them, from any
and atl claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the
CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Te. mecula of any contact amount which the
CONTRACTOR has not disputed above.
Dated: 6/10/99
CONTRACTOR
By: ?
Jim Perry, p~s~dent'
Print Name and Title
RELEASE
R;~C I~PR OJ~CT S ~'W0 7 ',,PWg?- 29%BiDDOC
ITEM 19
ORDINANCE NO. 99-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX TO
FINANCE THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING
OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES,
RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS,
MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND
TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITHIN THE TERRITORY ANNEXED TO
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS PART OF THE
REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS LAFCO No. 98-14-1
(REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California
Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, there is hereby
levied and assessed a special tax by the City of Temecula on each parcel of property in the
territory annexed to the City of Temecula as part of the reorganization designated as LAFCO
No. 98-14-1 (Redhawk and Vail Ranch) for each fiscal year, commencing with fiscal year
2000-01.
Section 2. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fiscal year shall
be $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling
unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant
property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property, and
$37.22 per acre for agricultural uses.
Section 3. The special tax imposed by this ordinance shall be collected in the
same manner, on the same dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as
other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of
Temecula. Said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a
lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together
with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the
City of Temecula by the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due.
Section 4. The revenue raised by the special tax imposed by this ordinance
shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of operating, maintaining, and
servicing public parks and recreational facilities, recreational and community services
programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of
Temecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith.
Section 5. The City Council, by three (3) affirmative votes, is empowered to
establish the amounts of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in amounts not to
exceed the maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this ordinance, as is required to provide
an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in this ordinance.
Ords\99-11 1
Section 6. The City Council shall be empowered to amend this ordinance by
three (3) affirmative votes of the members thereof for the purposes of carrying out the general
purposes of this ordinance in order to conform to state law that permits the County Tax
Collector, or other proper official, to collect a special tax such as is levied by this ordinance in
conjunction with County taxes or in order to assign duties pursuant to the ordinance to other
officers.
Section 7. No section of this ordinance shall be construed to permit, and the
City Council is expressly prohibited from, increasing the amounts of the special tax imposed by
this ordinance beyond the maximum amounts set forth in this ordinance.
Section 8. A property owner subject to the special tax may appeal the amount
of the special tax to be levied on such property owner's property pursuant to standards and
procedures established by resolution of the City Council.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment
of the special tax during a specific fiscal year would create a hardship for that property owner
during that fiscal year, such property owners may appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal
pursuant to standards and procedures established by resolution of the City Council.
Section 10. The special tax imposed by this ordinance shall not be imposed
upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon
any parcel of property that is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to
any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law.
Section 11. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any
person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdic-
tion, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and
to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. The City Council, and
the electorate by referendum, do hereby declare that they would have adopted this ordinance
and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of
the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions thereof,
be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 12. This ordinance, or any provisions thereof other than those
provisions, if any, which provide for modification by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
may only be amended or repealed by approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting on the
ordinance or provisions thereof at any initiative or referendum election.
Section 13. This ordinance shall be referred to, and shall be effective only if
approved by two-thirds (2/3) of, the voters within the annexation area for LAFCO 98-14-1 voting
at an election to be held on November 2, 1999, and shall go into effect on the effective date of
the annexation of LAFCO 98-14-1.
Section 14. The City Clerk shall cedify to the passage and adoption of this
ordinance and shall cause same to be published as required by law.
Ords\99-11 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
22nd day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99-11 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Coundl on the 8th day of June, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the
22nd day of June, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ords\99-11 3
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
JUNE 8, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:35
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Comerchero presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts Stone,
and Comerchero.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None.
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1,1 Approve the minutes of April 20, 1999;
1.2 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1999;
1.3 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1999.
2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months ended March 31, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended
March 31, 1999.
MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 2. The motion
was seconded by Director Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the
exception of Director Roberts who abstained with regard to Item 1.3 (Minutes of May 25, 1999).
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker commented and invited the public to the upcoming Fourth
of July Festivities; thanked the sponsors associated with these festivities; and further elaborated
on upcoming summer programs, including Summer Day Camp.
Minutes,csd\060899 1
Housing Redevelopment Manager Meyer provided information with regard to the Great Race Lunch
Stop in Old Town, on Saturday, June 19, 1999, advising that this event was sponsored by the
History Channel.
In light of the City hosting this particular event, Director Comerchero advised that the History
Channel donated a television and VCR to the Friends of the Library.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Nelson noted that the Summer/Fall Recreation Brochure has been sent out and
commended the Community Services Department on a job well done.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:39 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday,
June 22, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes,csd\060899 2
ITEM
2
APPROV~I~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22,1999
Amendment to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Excel
Landscape, lnc. for FY1999-00
PREPARED BY:
/"~Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Approve the Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment with Excel Landscape,
Inc. to accept the reassignment of the original agreement between the City and Excel
Landscape, Inc., to the Temecula Community Services District, in the amount of $738,468
and an additional amount not to exceed $65,820 for sites to be brought on line during the
term on the contract for Fiscal Year 1999-00.
Extend the term of the agreement for two (2) years and allow for the addition of supplement
landscape maintenance contract areas for the term of the agreement.
3. Approve contingency of 10% in the amount of $73,850 for extra work items.
BACKGROUND: Excel Landscape, Inc. (Excel) has been providing landscape maintenance
services for neighborhood parks and the north slope areas since July 1, 1997. Upon the
resignation of California Landscape Maintenance, Inc. on July 10, 1998, Excel assumed the
maintenance of the south slope areas, medians, sports parks and City facilities on July 11, 1998.
The conditions of some of the newly acquired areas were questionable and required some extra
attention. Excel did not request any additional compensation for their extra efforts to improve these
site conditions. The quality of their work and commitment to customer service has been excellent.
TCSD staff has negotiated the omission of the Consumer Price Index increase (approximately 2
%), as part of the proposed two (2) year contract extension. A potential savings to the City of
approximately $14,800 per year.
The contract amendment also has provisions that allow for the addition of supplemental landscape
maintenance contract areas that come on line during the remaining term of the agreement. The
R://HARRINGK/AGENDA.RPT/EXCELEXTEND99-00.TCSD1
proposed areas are spelled out in Exhibit B of the contract amendment.
In addition to the General Landscape Maintenance Services Contract Amendment the TCSD is
requesting the approval of a 10% contingency, required for extra work items. These extra work
items may include repairing, rehabilitating and improving City sites.
The contract also contains other provisions to extend the agreement for an additional two-year term
and allow for the addition of supplemental landscape maintenance contract areas that will come
on line during the remaining term of the agreement. This would require the approval by the Board
of Directors.
The re-assignment of the original agreement between the City of Temecula (City) and Excel
Landscape, Inc., (Excel) to the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) is required to
correct some technical concerns the City Attorney has with the present agreement. The original
agreement was between the City and Excel, however all of the subsequent amendments (a total
of six) are between the TCSD and Excel. In order to mitigate his concerns the City Attorney has
structured the contract amendment before you to allow for this re-assignment of the original
agreement to the TCSD. The reassignment will require the approval of both the City Council and
the TCSD.
FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Excel Landscape, Inc. including the additional
sites to be added during the term of the contract and the 10% contingency for Fiscal Year 1999-00
is $878,138. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal
Year 1999-00 in accounts 190-180, 190-181,190-182, 190-184, 190-185, 340-701,340-702, 001-
164 and 001-171.
ATTACHMENTS:
Amendment
Original Agreement
Six (6) Subsequent Amendments
R:IIHARRINGKIAGENDA.RPTIEXCELEXTEND99-OO.TCSDI
AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of June 22, 1999
by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), Temecula Community Services District
("District") and Excel Landscape, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as
follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes, which the parties agree are true and correct:
a. On June 247 1997, the City and Contractor, for the benefit of the
District, entered into an Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the
City's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights
-of-way.
b. The original Agreement was amended on July 1, 1998, August
11, 1998, January 11, 1998, and March 22, 1999, April 5, 1999, and April 15, 1999 in
order to add areas to the Contractor's Scope of Work. The June 24, 1997 Agreement,
as amended, shall be referred to as the "Agreement."
c. Section 9, of the Agreement provides for a contract term of 24
months which would expire on June 24, 1999 and a provision for two one year
extensions of the term of the agreement.
d. It is the desire of the parties to extend the term of this Agreement
for an additional period of two (2) years with a modified contract price and provisions
to add new parks and landscaped areas to the Scope of Work.
Section 2. of the Agreement, Scope of Work, is hereby amended to read
as follows:
"2. SCOPE OF WORK
"A . Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services in accordance with the
"City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the
areas described in the RFP and specifically designated on Exhibit A, Landscape
Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
B. A number of additional areas within the City will require landscape
maintenance services upon the completion of certain facilities during the term of
this Agreement, which areas described on Exhibit B, Supplement Landscape
Maintenance Contract Areas, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
as follows:
follows:
follows:
reference. Upon the effective date of any Change Order pursuant to Section 3
of this Agreement authorizing Contractor to provide landscape maintenance
services for one or more of the areas described on Exhibit B, Contractor shall
perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the
labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and
transportation services in accordance with the "City of Temecula: General
Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for the designated areas."
3. Section 3 of the Agreement, Change Orders, is hereby amended to read
"3. CHANGE ORDERS
"The City Manager is hereby authorized to approve Change Orders which: (1)
authorize the Contractor to proceed with landscape maintenance services for one
or more of the Supplement Contract Areas designated in Exhibit B at the prices
set forth in Exhibit B; or (2) modify the scope of work for a Contract Area, a
Supplemental Contract Area or the General Lan.dscape Maintenance
Specifications so long as the cumulative total costs of all such modifications
under this subsection (2) does not increase the total annual cost of the services
provided under this Agreement by more than ten percent (10%). All other
Change Orders shall be approved by the Board of Directors."
4. Section 4 of the Agreement, Payments, is hereby amended to read as
"4. COMPENSATION; PAYMENTS
"The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually
performed in accordance with the price schedules set forth in Exhibits A and B.
Contractor shall submit monthly invoices to the City specifying the work
accomplished during the period covered (ie., fertilization, pest control, etc.).
The City shall review the invoices submitted by Contractor to determine
whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made within thirty-five
(35) days following receipt of the invoice or City shall provide Contractor with
a written statement objecting to the invoice and specifying the objections.
Monthly invoices shall be sent to the City 's Finance Department at the address
specified in Section 25."
5. Section 9 of the Agreement, Term, is hereby amended to read as
"9. TERM
The Amendment shall remain in full force and effect until June
30, 2001.
Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with
or without cause, on thirty (30) days written notice to the other
party."
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
6. The Section 19, Insurance, of Section 1, Instruction and Information, of
the Request for Proposal dated May 21, 1997 and incorporated into the Agreement pursuant to
Section 1. of the Agreement, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"19. Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.
as broad as:
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA
00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker' s Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
"b . Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain
limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than:
(1) General Liability: two million dollars ($2,000,000) per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If
Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general
aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply
separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be
twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
(3) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's
Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily
injury or disease.
"c . Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles
or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City
Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City,
District and, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration and defense expenses.
"d . Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and
automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the
following provisions:
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
(1) The District and the City, and their respective officers,
officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as
respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of
the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor;
premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles
owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall
contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the
City, District and, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City,
District and, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any
insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, District and, their
officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the
Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions
of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, District and, their officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
(4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled
by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice to the District by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the District.
"e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with
insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless
otherwise acceptable to the District. Self insurance shall not be considered to
comply with these insurance requirements.
"f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the
District with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause.
The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to
bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by
the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District
before work commences. As an alternative to the District' s forms, the
Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by
these specifications. Exhibit E , Insurance Forms, attached to this RFP and
are incorporated herein as though set forth in full."
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
7. Exhibit A, Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas, attached to this
Seventh Amendment, is hereby substituted in place of all Exhibits to the Agreement and the
Amendments to the Agreement, including Exhibits 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 5A, and 6.
8. Exhibit B, Supplemental Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas,
attached to this Seventh Amendment, is hereby added to the Agreement.
9. City hereby assigns the Agreement to the District, which assignment is
accepted by the District. City hereby ratifies the acts of the District taken pursuant to
Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
10. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
////
IIII
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreemere to
be executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Steven J. Ford
Mayor
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Jeff Comerchero
President
Attest:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney/District Counsel
EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC., a California Corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
Site #
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-10
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-15
EXHIBIT A
Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas
(Amended as of June 8, 1999)
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site Name
Veterans Park
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Calle Amgon Park
Bahia Vista Park
Loma Linda Park
Riverton Park
John Magee Park
Voorburg Park
Nicolas Road Park
Butterfield Stage Park
Temecula Duck Pond
Rotary Park
Nakayama Park
Winchester Creek Park
MonthIv Price
$1,550.00
800.00
250.00
250.00
707.00
1,617.00
310.00
303.00
812.00
782.00
2,155.00
300.00
125.00
1,568.00
Annual Price
$18,600.00
9,600.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
8,484.00
19,404.00
3,720.00
3,636.00
9,744.00
9,384.00
25,860.00
3,600.00
1,500.00
18,816.00
TOTAL
$ 11,529.00
$138,348.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
STREETSCAPE SERVICE AREA
Site #
SS-1
Site Name
Via Eduardo Streetscape
Monthly Price
$106.00
Annual Price
$1,272.00
TOTAL
$ 106.00
$ 1,272.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Exc¢I Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4 (P-8)
SP-5
Site Name
Rancho California Sports Park
Paloma Del Sol Park
Pala Community Park
Kent Hintergardt Park
Margarita Community Park
Monthly Price
$9,294.00
3,592.00
2,333.00
3,359.00
3,147.00
Annual Price
$111,528.00
43, 104.00
27,996.00
40,308.00
37,764.00
TOTAL
$ 21,725.00
$ 260,700.00
R:\HARRINGK'xAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7,doe
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site #
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
M-5
Site Name
Rancho California Road Median
Ynez Road Median
Butterfield Stage Road Median
Margarita Road Median
Margarita Road Median at 79 South
TOTAL
Monthly Price
$400.00
500.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
$ 1,250.00
AnnuaiPrice
$4,800.00
6,000.00
1,800.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
$15,000.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7 (SS-2)
Site Name
Community Recreation Center
Senior Center
City Hall/Maintenance Facility
Temecula Community Center
Fire Station #84
Old Town Parking Lot A
Old Town Streetscape
Monthly Price
$1,444.00
361.00
541.00
193.00
400.00
250.00
987.00
Annual Price
$17,328.00
4,332.00
6,492.00
2,316.00
4,800.00
3,000.00
11,844.00
TOTAL
$ 4,176.00
$ 50,112.00
R: \HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
Site #
S-3a
S-3b
S-4
S-8
S-12
S-13
S-16
Site Name
Rancho Highlands
Rancho Highlands - Ynez Road Slope
The Vineyards
The Villages A and B
Vintage Hills
Presley (Viranda, Country
Glen, Bridlevale)
Tradewinds
Monthly Price
$515.00
1,000.00
255.00
4,734.00
4,600.00
1,408.00
863.00
Annual Price
$6,180.00
12,000.00
3,060.00
56,808.00
55,200.00
16,896.00
10,356.00
TOTAL
$ 13.375.00
$ 160,500.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(NORTH)
Site # Site Name
S-1 Saddlewood/Pavillion Point
S-2 Winchester Creek I and II
S-5 Signet Series
S-6 Woodcrest Country
S-7 Ridgeview
S-9 Rancho Solana
S-10 Martinique
S-11 Meadowview Estates
S-14 Mirada
S-15 Barclay Estates
S-17 Monte Vista
Monthly Price
$2,372.00
1,202.00
2,534.00
559.00
773.00
130.00
355.00
150.00
394.00
344.00
565.00
Annual Price
$28,464.00
14,424.00
30,408.00
6,708.00
9,276.00
1,560.00
4,260.00
1,800.00
4,728.00
4,128.00
6,780.00
TOTAL
$ 9,378.00
$112,536.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
Site #
M-6
M-7
M-8
M-9
M-10
M-11
M-12
M-13
M-14
EXHIBIT B
Supplement Landscape Maintenance Contract Areas
(Amended as of June 8, 1999)
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site Name
Margarita Road Median at Solana Ridge
Margarita Road Median at Tuscany Ridge
Margarita Road Median at Winchester Road
Margarita Road Median at Promenade Mall
Margarita Road Median at T-28850
Winchester Road Median at Jefferson
Rancho California Road Median at Porta~no
Paseo Del Sol Median Islands
Solana Way Median Islands
MonthIv Price
$50.00
100.00
50.00
300.00
75.00
100.00
100.00
500.00
75.00
TOTAL
$ 1,350.00
Annual Price
$600.00
1,200.00
600.00
3,600.00
900.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
6,000.00
900.00
16,200.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
SPORTS PARK SERVICE AREAS
Site #
SP-6
Site Name
Temeku Hills Sports Park
Monthly Price
$3,600.00
Annual Price
$43,200.00
TOTAL
$ $3,600.00
$ 43.200.00
R:\HARRINGK'xAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doc
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
F-8
F-9
Site Name
Temecula Valley Museum
Old Town Parking Lot B
Monthly Price
$285.00
250.00
AnnuaiPrice
$3,420.00
3,000.00
TOTAL
$ 535.00
$ 6,420.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGREEMNT\Excel Landscape 6-99 Amend. 7.doe
AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered into this 241h day of June 1997.
By and Between
City ofTemecula, a
Municipal corporation
hereinafier referred to
as "CITY"
and
Excel Landscape. Inc.
a California Corporation
hereinafier referred to
as "CONTRACTOR"
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain the services of a landscape maintenance Contractor to perform
landscape maintenance within the CITY's greenbelts, landscape service areas, medians, open space
areas, parks and rights-of-way.
WHEREAS, Contractor is a firm that possesses the necessary equipment, licenses, insurance, and
personnel to provide such services; and
WHEREAS, CITY's Council has authorized execution of this AGREEMENT to retain the services
of Contractor.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed that CITY does hereby retain Contractor to provide
landscape maintenance under the ti>llowing terms:
1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The complete Contract includes the following documents: 1) RFP and 2) General Landscape
Specifications. When the Specifications describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place
and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall
furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in
executing the Contract.
2. SCOPE OF WORK
t~ttlleyb~gerda~qr~197-8
CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the
labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services in
accordance with "City of Temecula: General Landscape Maintenance Specifications" for slopes
(north) and neighborhood parks as described in the RFP.
3. CHANGE ORDERS
All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manger is hereby
authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an
amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
4. PAYMENTS
The City agrees to compensate monthly the Contractor for services actually performed in accordance
with the pricing sheets attached hereto as Exhibits I and 2, and incorporated herein as though set
forth in full. Included with monthly billing will be the work functions accomplished during that
period, (i.e., fertilization, pest control, etc.). The City shall review the invoices submitted by the
Contractor to determine whether the services were performed. Payment shall be made thirty-five (35)
days following submittal of the invoice, or City shall provide the Contractor with a written statement
objecting to the invoice.
Monthly invoices shall be sent to:
City of Temecula
Finance Department
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: NONPERFORMANCE
Contractor may be assessed penalties by City up to one hundred percent (100%) of
the monthly value of a site for nonperformance and up to sixty percent (60%) of the
monthly value of a site for substandard performance. Such penalties shall be assessed
at the discretion of the City. Contractor shall be notified of any penalties in
accordance with the terms of this Contract.
The Contract may be terminated by City for failure of Contractor to satisfactorily
perform any corrective action after being notified of service failure on more than
seven(7) occasions during the base term of the Contract.
C,
Contractor shall be notified of service failure by delivery of a "Performance Deficiency
Notification" form to Contractor by City.
Said notice will serve as formal notification that Contractor has incurred a service
rxl~rtu. yb~sgenluXlnd'97-8.tfp
deficiency sufficiently material that contract termination may result if satisfactory
corrective action is not taken by Contractor.
The Performance Deficiency Notification will contain the acceptable time period for
service correction. Upon Deficiency Notification, the correction will either be
accepted or rejected. If accepted, part or all of the penalties may be waived,
regardless of whether City has incurred loss as a result of said service failure.
Contractor will be notified of correction acceptance status by delivery of a
Performance Deficiency Status Memorandum. Should correction not be accepted, a
separate additional Performance Deficiency Notification will be delivered to
Contractor, thus increasing the number of Deficiency Notices received by Contractor.
If Contractor should neglect or refuse or fail for any reason to perform the work, the
City may terminate the Contract for nonperformance with five (5) days written notice
to Contractor.
In case of termination by the City for nonperformance, the City may contract or cause
to be done any work not completed at the time of the termination, and the Contractor
shall pay for such work.
6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS
Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or before making each request for
payment, Contractor shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising
out of this Contract; the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a waiver of all
claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and
request for payment. Contractor shall execute an affidavit and release with each claim for payment.
7. PREVAILING WAGES
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California, the City
Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday
and overtime work in this locality for each crat~, classification, or type of workman needed to execute
this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file
with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing
wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the CITY, as a
penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or
mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this
Contract, by him or by any sub-contractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
8. LIABILITY INSURANCE
rxhartleyb~gerntu'tltd97,8.rfp
CONTRACTOR, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to
be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with
the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the
performance of the work of this Contract.
9. TERM
A,
The Contract shall remain in full force and effect for a period of 24 months from
the date of written notice to proceed, unless terminated by either party.
City reserves the right to exercise its option to extend this Agreement for two one-
year extensions within ninety (90) days prior to its expiration. Contract price shall be
adjusted at the beginning of each calendar year in accordance with the changes in the
Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-
Riverside Area published monthly by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics
(CPI).
Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason, with or without cause
within thirty (30) days written notice to the other party.
10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in this COntract. All time requirements stated herein shall be satisfied.
11. INDEMNIFICATION
All work covered by this Contract done at the work site or in preparing or delivering materials to the
site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and
defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of
persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the 9bligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and
except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of
the CITY.
rXimftleyb~aget~as~n~97-8.rfp
12. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION
No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may herea/~er exist or of conditions or difficulties
that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to
make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial
investigations or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be
accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the pan of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail
all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims
whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
13. GRATUI TIE S
CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives with a
view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto.
14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way
associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other provider of
Specifications. Contractor further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by
the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15. CONTRACTOR°S AFFIDAVIT
Simultaneously with submitting each monthly invoice, Contractor shall file with the City his affidavit
stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all sub-contractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project
for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering
disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions
of the laws of the State of California.
16. SIGNATURE OF Contractor
Corporations
The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President and
Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other persons may sign for
the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution of the corporate board of
directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Partnerships
The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The proposal
must be signed by all partners comprising the pannership unless proof in the form of a certified copy
of a certificate ofpannership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner is presented to the City
Clerk, in which case the general partner may sign.
rU~rl~yb~g~n~lg7-8.rfp
Joint Ventures
Proposals submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer.
Individuals
Proposals subrnjtted by individuals must be signed by the Contractor, unless an up-to-date power of
attorney is on file in the City Cierk's office, in which case said person may sign for the individual.
The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition, however,
where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature.
17. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES
Whenever Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens
to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
18. BOOKS AND RECORDS
CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the
performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any
authorized representative of the CITY.
19. UTII,ITY LOCATION
CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California
Government Code Section 4215.
20. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS
CONTRACTOR agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with
Government Code Section 4216.2.
2 I. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/CONDITIONS
CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed plan for worker protection during the excavation of trenches
required by the scope of the ~vork in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705.
A,
CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing the condition, notify CITY in writing as
soon as Contractor, or any of Contractors sub-contractors, agents, or employees have
knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following
conditions:
r~hankyb~r. cndMM~197-8.tfp
The presence of any material that the Contractor believes is hazardous waste,
as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code:
Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those
indicated in the specifications; or
Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different
materially for those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as
inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract.
Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken, Contractor
shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent the hazardous waste
or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person.
CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If CITY, through, and in
the exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ,
or do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the
Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, then
CITY shall issue a change order.
D,
In the event of a dispute between CITY and Contractor as to whether the conditions
materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or part of the work,
Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date, and shall
proceed with all work to be performed under the contract. Contractor shall retain any
and all rights which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the
parties.
22. INSPECTION
The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by authorized CITY personnel. All inspections
and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be
subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections.
Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time a~er completion of the work.
23. DISCRIMINATION
CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment
practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
24. GOVERNING LAW
This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of
California. Venue shall be the County of Riverside. In the event litigation is commenced by either
party with respect to this contract, the prevailing party in such litigation, as determined by the Court,
shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees.
rU~trtleybxager~as~lnd97-8.rfp
25. WRITTEN NOTICE
Any written notice required to be given in any part of ~he Contract Documents shall be performed
by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor
as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
reek, City Clerk
r'~ha~l~yb~geulM~d97-8.rfp
EXHIBIT 1
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-10
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
Site Name Monthly Price Annual Price
Veterans Park $] ,5~.00 $'18,600.00
Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00 $ 9,600.00
Calle Aragon Park $ 933.00 $ 3,000.00
Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00
Loma Linda Park $ 707.00 $ 8,484.00
Pdvenon Park $1,617.00 $19,404.00
John Magee Park $ 310.00 $ 3,720.00
Voorburg Park $ 303.00 S 3,636.~
Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00 $ 9,744.00
Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00 $ 9,384.00
Temecula Duck Pond $1,]~5.00
Rotary Park $ 300.00 $ 3,600.00
Nakayama Park $ 125.00 $1,500.00
TOTAL $8,961.00 $107,532.00
EXHIBIT 2
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(NORTH)
Site #
S-1
S-2
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-14
S-15
Site Name
Saddlewood/Pavillion Point
Winchester Creek I and II
Signet Series
Woodcrest Country
Pddgeview
Rancho Solana
Martinique
Meadowview Estates
Mirada
Barclay Estates
Monthly Price
$ ~,~?~-(Y)
$ l
$ 2,534.00
$ 559.00
$ 773.00
$ l"~,m
$ 355.00
$ 150.00
$ 394.00
$ 344.00
Annual Price
$ la,a?a m
$ 6.708.00
$ 9,276.00
$ ~ ,560.00
$ 4,2C~0.00
$ 1,800.00
$ 4,7~.00
$ 4.]~a.00
TOTAL
$ 8,813,00
$ lf]~,7~6
?atho
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1.1998 by
and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape. Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
purposes:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
agreement for landscape maintenance services within the CITY's green belts,
landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, _parks and rights-of-way.
("Agreement").
Amendment.
The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
2. Exhibit 1 to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 1A is added to the Agreement as set forth on Attachment
"A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though
set forth in full.
3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
be executed the day and year first above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
BY:
Ronald E. Bradley, City~'.,r
ATTEST:
BY:
S o s, Cjt Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
Excel Landscape, Inc.
TITLE: vF)~~
Site #
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-IO
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
SS-1
ATTACHMENT "A"
EXHIBIT 1A
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site Name
Veterans Park
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Calle Aragon Park
Bahia Vista Park
Loma Linda Park
Riverton Park
John Magee Park
Voorburg Park
Nicolas Road Park
Butterfield Stage Park
Temecula Duck Pond
Rotary Park
Nakayama Park
Via Eduardo Streetscape
Monthly Price Annual Price
1,550.00 $ 18.600.00
800,00 9.600.00
250.00 3.000.00
:250,00 3.000.00
707.00 8.484.00
1,617.00 19.404.00
310.00 3.720.00
303.00 3.636.00
812.00 9.744.00
782.00 9.384.00
1.155.00 13.860.00
300.00 3,600.00
125.00 1.500.00
106.00 1,272.00
TOTAL
~9.067.00 ~108.804.00
ii':] ,~ ~
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 11,
1998 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and
Excel Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's green belts,
landscape service areas, medians, open space areas, parks and rights-of-way.
("Agreement").
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth
in this Amendment.
2. Exhibits 3, 4, 5, and 6 to the Agreement are hereby added to the
Agreement as set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms
and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The
Agreement will be terminated effective July 1, 1999.
R:tRUSEPICONTRACTtAMDEXCEL WPD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
Temecula Community Services District
Attest:
one
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
RARUSEP~CONTRACT~4MDEXCEL WPD
ATTACHMENT A
R.'~USEPtCONTI~CT~4MDI~XCEL WPD
Site #
S-3a
S-3b
S-4
S-8
S-12
S-13
S-16
EXHIBIT 3
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
Site Name
Rancho Highlands
Rancho Highlands-Ynez Road Slope
The Vineyards
The Villages A & B
Vintage Hills
Presley (Viranda, Country Glen/
79 South, Bridlevale)
Tradewinds
Monthly Price Annual Price
$ 515.00 $ 6,180.00
1.000.00 1 ~.000.00
755.00 3.060.00
4.734.00 56.808.00
4,600.00 55. ~ 00.00
1.408.00 16.896.00
863.00 10.356.00
TOTAL
$13.375.00 ~160.500.00
~orlze/d~Sig~t ~
R.-iRUSEPICONTR/IC-I~i.~.fDF~yCI:'L WPD
EXHIBIT 4
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
M-1
M-2
M-3
M4
Site Name
Rancho California Road Median
Ynez Road Median
Butterfield Stage Road Median
Margarita Road Median
Monthly Price
$
$ 500.00
$
$ 1cf),00
Annual Price
S 4,8(](],00
$ 6,000.00
$1,800.00
$ 1
TOTAL
t~re
EXHIBIT 5
City of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA
SP-I
SP-2
SP-3
P-8 (SP-4)
Site Name
Rancho California Sports Park
Paloma Del Sol Park
Pala Commumty Park
Kent Hintergardt Park
Monthly Price
$ 9,294.00
$ 3,592.00
$ 2.333.00
$ 3,359.00
Annual Price
$111,528.00
S 4t,lfi4_Cll
$ 27.996.OO
TOTAL
$ 18.578.00
hotur~e
EXHIBIT 6
City, of Temecula
Request for Proposal
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
Site Name
Community Recreation Center
Senior Center
City Hall/Maintenance Facility
Temecuia Commumty Center
Fire Station #84
Old Town Parking Lot
Monthly Price
$
$ 361,00
$ 54_l.00
$ 193,00
$ 580.00
$ 250.00
Annual Price
$17,328.00
$ 4,332.00
$ 6,492.00
$ 2,316.00
S 6,of43_m
$ 3,000,00
TOTAL
$ 3,369.00
h.~~i~atur'c/d'C
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as o: January 1 I,
1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
A. On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way ("Agreement").
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 1 A to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement
and in its place a new Exhibit 1 B is added to the Agreement as set
forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
Jo~e..'Alfaro
o , er ,
Tem/~.~y Services District
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager
Attest:
1Jones,
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT "A"
EXHIBIT 1B
(As amended January 11, 1999)
City of Temecula
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-10
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-15
SS-1
Site Name Monthly Price
Veterans Park $ 1,550.00
Sam Hicks Monument Park $ 800.00
Calle Aragon Park $ 250.00
Bahia Vista Park $ 250.00
Loma Linda Park $ 707.00
Riverton Park $ 1.617.00
John Magee Park $ 310.00
Voorburg Park $ 303.00
Nicolas Road Park $ 812.00
Butterfield Stage Park $ 782.00
Temecula Duck Pond $ 1,155.00
Rotary Park $ 300.00
Nakayama Park $ 125.00
Winchester Creek Park $ 1.568.00
Via Eduardo Streetscape $ 106.00
Annual Price
$18.600.00
$ 9,600.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 8,484.00
$19,404· 00
$ 3,720.00
$ 3,636.00
$ 9,744.00
~ 9,384.00
$13.860.00
$ 3,600.00
$ 1,500.00
$18,816.00
$ 1,272.00
TOTAL
$ 10,635.00 9127,620.00
Authorized Signature
AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 22,
1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
Ae
On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on
July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, and January 11, 1999. The June
24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be known as the
Agreement.
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 4 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 4A will be added to the Agreement as set
forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. The cost for this
new site will be $100.00 per month.
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
RAHARRINGK ~AGE.VDA.RPT~EXCEL AMENDAIENT 4A FY 98-99.DOC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
J I
her
Tem~ Services District
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager
Attest:
Susan W Jones, CMC
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
R:tHJRRINGK~4GEND,4.RPT~XCE],, ,4MENDMENT 4,4 FY J)8-99.DOC
ATTACHMENT "A"
R: ~HARRINGKU,I GEND.4.RPT~iZ VCEL AhtENDMENT 4.4 FY 98-99.DOC
F_3Gi]3]T 4A
(As amended March 22, 1999)
City of Temecula
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site #
M-1
M-2
M-3
M-4
*M-5
Site Name Monthly Price
Rancho California Road Median ~ 400.00
Ynez Road Median $ 500.00
Butterfield Stage Road Median $ 150.00
Margarita Road Median $ 100.00
Margarita Road Median at 79 South $ 100.00
Annual Price
$ 4,800.00
$ 6,000.00
$ 1,800.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,200.00
* New Site
TOTAL
$ 1,250.00 $15,000.00
Sig/ure~
R:tf.I.4RRINGKL4GENDA.RpT~F_,VCEL AMENDMENT 4A FY 98-99.DOC
AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 5,
1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
Ae
On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way. This original agreement was amended on
July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999 and March 22,
1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as amended, shall be
known as the Agreement·
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 1 B to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 1 C is added to the Agreement as set forth on
Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
Teme I .~y Services District
~elson, Acting City Manager
Attest:
Susan W. JoneS, CMC
City C erk
Approved as to form:
Peter M. orson
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT "A"
EX}t/BIT 1C
(As amended April 5, 1999)
City of Temecula
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-9
P-IO
P-11
P-12
P-13
P-14
P-15
SS-1
*SS-2
Site Name
Veterans Park
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Calle Aragon Park
Bahia Vista Park
Loma Linda Park
Rivercon Park
John Magee Park
Voorburg Park
Nicolas Road Park
Butterfield Stage Park
Temecula Duck Pond
Rotary Park
Nakayama Park
Winchester Creek Park
Via Eduardo Streetscape
Old Town Streetscape
Monthly Price Annual Price
1,550.00 $18,600.00
800.00 9 9,600.00
250.00 9 3,000.00
250.00 $ 3,000.00
707.00 $ 8,484.00
1,617.00 $19,404.00
310.00 $ 3,720.00
303.00 $ 3,636.00
812.00 9 9,744.00
782.00 $ 9,384.00
1,155.00 913,860.00
300.00 $ 3,600.00
125.00 $ 1,500.00
1,568.00 918,816.00
106.00 $ 1,272.00
987.00 $11,844.00
* New Site
TOTAL
$ 11,622.00 $139,464.00
AMENDMENT NO. 6
TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND EXCEL LANDSCAPE DATED JUNE 24, 1997 FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 15,
1999 by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City") and Excel
Landscape ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and
purposes:
On June 24, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into an
Agreement for landscape maintenance services within the City's
green belts, landscape service areas, medians, open space areas,
parks and rights-of-way· This original agreement was amended on
July 1, 1998, August 11, 1998, January 11, 1999, March 22,
1999 and April 1, 1999. The June 24, 1997 agreement, as
amended, shall be known as the Agreement.
B. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
Amendment.
Exhibit 5 to the agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and
in its place a new Exhibit 5A will be added to the Agreement as set
forth on Attachment "A" to this amendment, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as though set forth in full,
Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
Excel Landscape
T.7~t~y Services District
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting City Manager
Attest:
~~~- k. ,'~ ~,~~
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT "A"
EXI-]]BIT 5A
(As amended April 15, 1999)
City of Temecula
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SPORTS PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4 (P-8)
*SP-5
Site Name
Rancho California Sports Park
Paloma Del Sol Park
Pala Community Park
Kent Hintergardt Park
Margarita Community Park
Monthly Price Annual Price
9,294.00 $111,528.00
3,592.00 $ 43, 104.00
2,333.00 $ 27,996.00
3,359.00 $ 40,308.00
3,147.00 $ 37,764.00
* New Site
TOTAL
$ 21,725.00 $260,700.00
ITEM
CITY ATTORNA:YPROV~'~
TO-'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
..erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement
Areas into Service Level C for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
PREPARED BY: ~, Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD
SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING RESIDENTIAL STREET
LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000.
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN TRACT NO. 28309 INTO SERVICE LEVEL C (RATE
LEVEL 1 ) FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000.
3. Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement documents.
BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, applications are
reviewed regarding the acceptance of perimeter slope areas, residential street lighting, and the
inclusion of additional subdivisions into existing TCSD maintenance programs. Energy costs
for residential street lighting is provided through Service Level B and perimeter slope and
landscape areas are maintained through Service Level C.
For Fiscal Year 1999-2000, sixteen (16) residential tracts and the parcels within those tracts
will be levied within the Service Level B Rates and Charges at 925.68 per parcel, as follows:
r:\yasinobk\b&onew.99 062299
Tract No. 23220
Tract No. 23371-5
Tract No. 23371-6
Tract No. 23371-7
Tract No. 23371-9
Tract No. 23371-10
Tract No. 23371-11
Tract No. 23371-14
Tract No. 24182-1
Tract No. 24184-F
Tract No. 24184-1
Tract No. 24185-1
Tract No. 24186-F
Tract No. 24186-1
Tract No. 24186-2
Tract No. 24232
In addition, Regency Homes, Inc. has completed the necessary Proposition 218 proceedings for
the transfer of perimeter landscaping within Tract No. 28309 into the TCSD maintenance
program beginning Fiscal Year 1999-2000. Located along Nicolas Road, the landscaping has
been inspected and approved by the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. The proposed
inclusion of this area in to Service Level C, Rate Level I will result in the annual levy of $46.00
per residential parcel within Tract No. 28309.
FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the aforementioned tracts and the parcels within
those tracts into the appropriate service levels has been incorporated into the TCSD budgets
for Service Level B and C for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution to accept certain tracts into Service Level B.
Resolution to accept certain slopes into Service Level C
r: \yaainobk\b&ca~v/. 99 062299
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO SERVICE LEVEL B
FOR PURPOSES OF ENERGIZING RESIDENTIAL STREET
LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows:
A. The Temecula Community Services District has assumed costs
associated with energizing the street lighting within the following residential Tracts No.:
Tract No. 23220
Tract No. 23371-5
Tract No. 23371-6
Tract No. 23371-7
Tract No. 23371-9
Tract No. 23371-10
Tract No. 23371-11
Tract No. 23371-14
Tract No. 24182-1
Tract No. 24184-F
Tract No. 24184-1
Tract No. 24185 - 1
Tract No. 24186-F
Tract No. 24186-1
Tract No. 24186-2
Tract No. 24232
B. The Temecula Community Services District is currently providing
residential street lighting services through Service Level B; and
C. The Temecula Community Services District is the authorized
legislative body to accept the responsibility of energizing residential street lights within the City of
Temecula.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District hereby
accepts the aforementioned residential tracts into the Service Level B rate level for residemial street
lighting services beginning Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
Section 3. The Secretary shall certi~r to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 22nd of June, 1999.
Jeff Comerchero, President
r:\yasinobk\b&~now.99 062299
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting
thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT:
DIRECTORS:
ABSTAIN:
DIRECTORS:
r: \ytsinobk\b&enew.99 062299
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS WITFIIN TRACT NO. 28309 INTO SERVICE LEVEL
C (RATE LEVEL 1) FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING
FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows:
A. The conditions of approval for Tract Map No. 28309 (Regency Homes,
Inc.) required the developer to improve the perimeter slopes and landscaping as part of the
overall subdivision improvements; and,
B. That the offer of dedication was made on Final Map No. 28309, recorded
on June 30, 1997; and,
C. The annual parcel charges for perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance
services were established by the majority of the property owners of Tract Map No. 28309 voting
at an election held on December 12, 1997 and in accordance with the provisions of Proposition
218; and,
D. The Temecula Community Services District is the existing authorized
legislative body authorized to provide maintenance of perimeter slope and landscape areas within
the aforementioned developments.
Section 2.
hereby accepts:
The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District
A. The offer of dedication for the improved slopes and perimeter landscaping
within Tract No. 28309; and
B. The inclusion of said area into the Service Level C rate level for
maintenance purposes beginning Fiscal Year 1999-2000, more particularly described in Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated into this resolution by reference.
Section 3. The Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 22nd of June, 1999.
r:\yasinobk\b&cn~v.99 062299
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT:
DIRECTORS:
DIRECTORS:
r:\yasinobk\b&enew.99 062299
EXHIBIT A
VICINITY MAP FOR TCSD PERIMETER SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS - TRACT NO. 28309
More particularly described as a 5.00 foot easement strip for slope and landscape maintenance
purposes over lot numbers 1, and 34 through 46, of Tract No. 28309 as shown on map filed in
Book 263, pages 55 through 59 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside
County, State of California, on June 30, 1997 (No. 231254).
TCSD Maintenance Area
. g ~ 'A' MI~ ~ ~ ~ a
t)~ ", ~ ~ ~ '" ~ .
r:\yasinobk\b&cnew.99 062299
ITEM
4
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY ~/~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
Award Restroom Maintenance Services Contract for FY 1999-00
PREPARED BY:
Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors:
Award a two (2) year contract to Self's Janitorial Service to provide park and facility
restroom maintenance services in the amount not to exceed ~41,400 for Fiscal Year
1999-00.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a
Request for Proposal (RFP) for Park Restroom Maintenance Services in April 1999. The TCSD
received six (6) proposals, which were evaluated to determine qualifications and to assess the
competitiveness of their pricing. Self's Janitorial Service was determined to be the lowest
qualified bidder for the required services. The contract will provide restroom maintenance
services for existing City maintained restrooms and will allow the addition of future sites as
they come on line during the term of the contract.
FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for Self's Janitorial Service for FY 1999-00
is $41 ,400.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the TCSD and the Public Works Annual
Operating Budgets for FY 1999-00 in accounts:
190-180-999-5250
001-164-603-5250
Attachments: 1 )
2)
Agreement
Cost per Unit Comparison
\\TEMEC FS201\DATA\DEPTS\CSD\HARRINGKXAGENDA. RPTXSELFS JANI SERV-99-00 CONTRACT. DOC
Restroom Maintenance Contract
Request for Proposal Results
(Cost per Unit Comparison)
Self's Janitorial
A Woman's Touch
Custom Service Systems
Bechtel Property Management
L & G Property Maintenance
Barrera Janitorial
9210.00
9221.00
9290.00
9338.00
9576.33
9694.00
R:\HARRINGKXAGENDA.RPT',SELFS JANI SERV-99-00 CONTRACT. DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RESTROOM MAINTENANCE
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of June 22 ,1999, between the
Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation ("City") and Self's Janitorial
Service ("Contractor'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein,
the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1999, and shall
remain and continue in effect until June 30 ,2001, with two (2) one year renewals at the sole
option of the City, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Contractor shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Contractor
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual services performed. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and the schedule
of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Eighty Two Thousand Eight
Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($ 82,800.00 ) for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty -five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the Board of Directors.
c. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees it shall give written
notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
R:\HARRINGK%AGREEMNT%Selrs Janitorial 6-99.doc 1
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days
prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under
this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion
of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of
this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall
pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that
the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this
Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the
Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor
with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales,
costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance
of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain adequate records of services provided
in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily
accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at
reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books
and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection
of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records,
together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt
of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor.
R:~-IARRINGK~GREEMNT~SelrS Janitodal 6-99.doc 2
With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Contractor shall make
available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software
and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and exped witness fees,
or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur
or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the
performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its
agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2)
Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06
92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor
owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General
Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California
and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees
while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation
insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration
that it has no employees.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance
or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the
general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3)
Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
R:\HARRINGK%AGREEMNT~Selrs Janitorial 6-99.doc 3
(4)
Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager,
either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed
operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the
Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the
Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the
scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees
or volunteers.
(2)
For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3)
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4)
The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5)
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state
that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior
written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given
to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall
not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNT~SelFs Janitonal 6-99.doc 4
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall
at all times be under Contractor"s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers,
employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of
Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall
not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any
manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to
incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement,
City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services
hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed
by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor
shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and
its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor
to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be
considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City's prior written
authorization. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property
located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary"
provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition,
request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order
or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with
respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation,
to represent Contractor and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor
agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to
discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, City's right to review any such response does
not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery
by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMN~Self's Jamtonal 6-99.doc 5
a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below
or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon
delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the
document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Contractor:
Self's Janitorial Service
332 W. 2"d Street
Perris, CA 92370
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual
services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in
writing between the City Council and the Contractor.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this
Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind
Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
R:~HARRINGk'~AGREEMN~SelFs Janitorial 6-99.doc 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero, President
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
R:\HARRINGIGAGREEMN'I'~Self's Janitorial 6-99.doc 7
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
SCOPE OF WORK
Lock all facilities between 10:00 PM - 11:00 PM
Clean and stock all facilities between the hours of 10:00PM and 6:00AM.
Record and submit daily maintenance activities, vandalism, and graffiti on Restroom
Maintenance Checklist {Exhibit E) form to the City's Maintenance Supervisor or other
designated person. Keep and provide records as required by City representative.
Provide all necessary equipment, tools, chemicals, supplies, etc. necessary to perform
specified work.
City to provide all paper products (toilet paper, seat covers, paper towels). Submit request
for products weekly.
Perform all activities in a safe manner per OSHA's requirements, utilizing all personal
safety items required to prevent accidents, illness or injury to maintenance personnel and
the public.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CLEANING AND STOCKING FACILITY
* Sweep restrooms and remove litter from interior and exterior of building (6' walkway
around restroom building).
* Empty interior trash containers and replace liners (washout containers and clean
receptacles).
* Scrub and sanitize toilets and lavatories.
* Wipe down all fixtures, removing water, dirt, stains and any other incongruous substance.
** Wash (hose out) floors. Squeegee excess water out of building and off of hardscape.
Remove any paper or other trash accumulated from this procedure.
* Remove dirt, stains, or other debris on wall, ceilings, and light fixtures.
* Stock all toilet paper, or other paper products. All dispenser to be filled daily.
* Remove minor graffiti from building interior. Record on report form both graffiti removed, as
well as graffiti that you were unable to remove.
*** Pressure wash floors and walls.
FREQUENCY:
* Items to be performed daily. (Monday through Sunday)
** Items to be performed Mondays and Fridays
*** Items to be performed monthly.
NOTE:
The specifications are minimum requirements for the maintenance of City restroom facilities. The
restrooms shall be maintained in a neat, clean, and sanitary condition on a daily basis. Some
situations may require additional work to be performed to insure the health and safety of the public.
No additional compensation will be given for such work. No unsafe condition shall be left without
notification of City's authorized representative.
R:\HARRINGK'~AGREEMNT~Seli"s Janitorial 6-99.doc 8
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
SITE
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Butterfield Stage Park
Winchester Creek Park
Rancho California Sports Park (Rancho Vista fields)
Rancho California Sports Park (North/South Fields)
Rancho California Sports Park (Skate Park)
Paloma Del Sol Park
Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park
Pala Community Park
Margarita Community Park
6th Street Parking Lot
Temecula Elementary School Pool
ADDRESS
41970 Moreno Road
33654 De Portota Road
39950 Margarita Road
30875 Rancho Vista Rd
42775 Margarita Road
42569 Margarita Road
32099 De Portola Road
31465 Via Cordoba
44900 Temecuia Lane
29119 Margarita Road
41952 Front Street
41951 Moraga Road
PRICE PER
MONTH
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
$210.00
PRICE PER
YEAR
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
$2 520.00
TOTAL PRICE
$2,520.00 $30,240.00
ADDITIONAL SITES TO BE ADDED DURING
THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT
Temecula Duck Pond
Temecula Valley High School Restroom
Temeku Hills Sports Park (2 restrooms)
ADDRESS
28250 Rancho Caiif. Rd.
31555 Rancho Vista Rd.
La Serena & Meadows
TOTAL PRICE
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
SCOPE OF WORK
Butterfield Stage Park
Maintain holding tank per manufacturer,
Clivus Multrum, Inc., see Exhibit D
PRICE PER PRICE PER
MONTH YEAR
$210.00 $2,520.00
$210.00 $2,520.00
$420.00 $5,040.00
$840.00 $10,080.00
PRICE PER PRICE PER
MONTH YEAR
$90.00 $1,080.00
TOTAL PRICE $3,450.00 $41,400.00
Payments shall be made monthly for actual services performed in the amount not to exceed:
$3,450.00
R:\HARRINGK~AGREEMNTSelFs Janitonal 6-99.doc 9
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting General Manager
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Director of Support Services
June 22, 1999
Ratification of Election Results -Tract No. 23143
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-.._
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING
THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT MAIL4N BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 2, 1999
DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS
PROVIDED BY LAW
BACKGROUND: At the meeting of Apdl 13, 1999, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No.
CSD 99-05, which called for a Special Election to be held among the property owners of the parcels
within Tract No. 23143. The purpose of this election was to establish Service Level B, Service Levd C
and Service Level D rates and charges for fiscal year 2000-01.
This election was conducted by mail with a final date for acceptance of ballots to be no later than 3:30
p.m. on June 2, 1999. At 4:00 p.m. on that date, the City Clerk acting in her capacity as the City's
Election Official and as the Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services
District declared the receipt pedod for receiving ballots closed. At 4:00 p.m., the Elections Canvassing
Board duly appointed and consisting of Deputy City Clerk Michaela A. Ballreich, Administrative Secretary
Cheryl Domenoe and Records Coordinator Gwyn Flores, conducted the canvass of the results. The
results of the votes cast, returned within the time allowed and publicly counted, are included within the
body of the proposed resolution.
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution ratifying the results of this election.
Ageride Report~ CSD Tract 23143 1
FISCAL IMPACT:
election results.
ATTACHMENTS:
There is no direct fiscal impact as · consequence of the ratification of the
Resolution No. CSD 99-
Off'mial Tally of the Votes
Ageede Repodl~:bdio~ CSD Tied 23143 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTCe.8 OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECITING THE
FACT OF THE SPECIAL TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT MAIL4N BALLOT ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 2, 1999
DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS
PROVIDED BY LAW
WHEREAS, a Special MaiNn Ballot Election was held and conducted in the City of
Temecula, California, on June 2, 1999, as required by law;, and
WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in tim, form and manner as provided by law;,
that~hepep~seofthespecla~elec~ionwasforthepuq}~seof~btaii~ppmv~bypr~perty~wners
within Tract No. 23143 was properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in
all respects lhe election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed
and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the
Elections Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. CSD 99.05, adopted April 13, 1999, the ballots were
returned to the oilroe of the City Cierk/Seoretary of the Temecula Community Services District; the
msulta were mc/ved, canvassed in public and are herein set forth in Section 2.
NOW THEREFORE, THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, DOE8 RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the homeowne~ election was one (1)
and the whole number of provisional baliota cast in the election was none (0).
Seotion 2. That the whole number of baliota cast was one (1) for establishment of the
annual levy for Service Level B rates and charges at $25.68/per lot and Service Level C rates and
charges at $1 75.(X)/per lot on the parcel identified on the ballot were as follows:
yes No Inoomplete
Future 1,026 residential
parcels within Tract No.
23143 and its subsequent
phases, ft.lh~ identified as a
resulxlivlaion of Parcel IVlp
22429 Under ownership of
Thomas D. Pomeroy,
President ~
None None
RmaoLCSDX99- I
Sel}Ut}n 3. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Commun~ Services District does
declare and detemr~that as a resultof the eteclion, a majority of the voters voting on the measure
relating to the establishment of Service Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D Rat, and
C, harges for Fiscal Year 200001 pursuant to Article XIIID, Section 6 of the California Constitution,
did vote in favor of the measure and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted
and mUfied.
Se,~don 4. The City Clerk/Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
shell enter in the minutes of the TCSD Board of Directors, a statement of the result of the election,
showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the C, lty; (2) The votes in favor, (3) The votes in
opposition and (4) Those received incomplete.
Se,~on 5. The C. ity C4erk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999.
A'I'rEST:
Jeff Comerchem, President
Susan W. Jones, CIVIC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAUFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Temecula
Community Services District on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following roll call vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DISTRICT MEMBERS:
DISTRICT MEMBERS:
DISTRICT MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
C, ity Clerk/District Secretary
OFFICIAL TALLY OF TIIE VOTES FOR
TCSD LEVY/SPECIAL TAX
FY 2000/01 - TRACt 23143
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TRACT TO BE ACCEPTED INTO SERVICE LF~VEL B,
SERVICE LEVEL C AND SERVICE LEVEL D
RATES AND CHARGES
Ye.s
N._fi
TOTAL
TOTAL
ELECTION BOARD
Election Officer
Cheryi Do~enoe, Election Officer
Gwy~n' ~r~es,~!ection OffiCer
R:~ELECTION - GENERAL~ANVASS.DOC
ITEM 6
APPROV~~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
TO,'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
---~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FisCal Year 1999-2000
PREPARED BY:
RECO MMEN DATIO N:
eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
That the Board of Directors:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
2. Adopt
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES
AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET
LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND
SERVICE LEVEL D - RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION
SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000.
a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES
AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R - STREET AND ROAD
MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary
community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD
operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the
same as those of the City of Temecula.
R:\ynsinobk\tesdl~v3~.99 062299
Property owners pay only for the TCSD services that they actually receive through separate
rates and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and
Service Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City's
Parks/Street Lighting Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. Although
the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities through a
cooperative agreement with the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax will be
considered by the City Council on June 22, 1999.
As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels:
Service Level B- Residential Street LiQhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of residential street lighting.
Service Level C - Perimeter LandscaoinQ and Slope Maintenance. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping. Operation
and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping
services for single family residences.
Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Operations, construction, and maintenance
of streets and roads throughout the City.
Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that
receive street lighting services. The proposed rate of ~25.68 per property owner has not been
increased from last fiscal year.
Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving
TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The four (4) rate levels for Service
Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows:
Rate C-1: $ 46.00
Rate C-2: ~ 89.00
Rate C-3: ~ 116.00
Rate C-4: $175.00
Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single family
residential properties in the City of Temecula. For Fiscal Year 1999-2000, the rate and charge
is proposed to be ~172.56, and increase of ~1.92 from last year. This is due to an increase
in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Service Level "R" includes only those parcels which receive services for the maintenance of
certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The proposed rates for this
service level will not increase from last year. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R are
identified as follows:
Residential Rate R-l:
Vacant Rate R-l:
$115.26
~ 57.64
R:\yaainobk\tcsdlcvy.cad 061698
Residential Rate R-2:
Vacant Rate R-2:
,~121.92
60.96
The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only
those property owners who receive services from a particular service level pay for those
services· In summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service
levels will receive an increase of $1.92 in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1999-00.
The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California
Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and
charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is ~3,211,051.
The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund slope maintenance;
residential street lighting; recycling and refuse collection services; and streets and road
maintenance in the City of Temecula.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. CSD 99- Service Levels B, C, and D.
Resolution No. CSD 99- Service Level R.
Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 1999-2000·
R:\yasinobk\te~llovy.99 062299
RESOLUTION NO. CSD
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL
B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C
- SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE LEVEL D -
RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND
ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,
1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"), to
provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD
has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has
elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same
persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the
TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By
previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the operation,
maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting, slope maintenance, and
recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a
written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report
contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and
charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of
Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including
necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed
rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated
herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the
TCSD, and is available for public inspection.
Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing
of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed
rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and
affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD.
r:\yasinobk\tesdreso. 99 062299
Section 5. On June 22, 1999, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing
on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors
heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested
person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of
such rates and charges.
Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the
District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable cost
of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and
protests and adopts the rates and charges for residential street lighting, slope maintenance, and
recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 as set out on Exhibit "A" for
the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
Section 8. The TCSD shah collect such rates and charges at the same time and in
the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property
taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time
and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws
applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to,
those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption,
are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code
Section 483 1. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the
charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a
bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on
which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shah not result in a lien
against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the
classification of the owner' s property for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, or claims that an error has been
made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates
and charges to the owner' s property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy
by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999,
pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of
classification or correction of errors program.
Section 10. ffa property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that
payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a
hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to
procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal
program.
Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 1999,
the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not
r:\yasinobk\t~droso.99 062299
exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered,
authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as
shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor,
Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and
collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public
Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates
and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD.
Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 22nd day of June, 1999.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
AB SENT: DIRECTORS:
r:\yasinobk\tesdre~o.99 062299
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVELS B, C, AND D
On July 1, 1998, MuniFinaneial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the
Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year
1999-2000. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the
Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq. the TCSD
has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to
provide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and
description of each parcel within a specific senrice level. A Service Level is a defined area that
provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels
contained within that service level, as follows:
Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of all residential street lights.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
Service Level D - Refuse Collection. Recycling and Street Sweeping. Operations
and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping
services for all single-family residential homes.
r:\ya~inobk\t~!r~o.99 062299
The Financial Analysis contained herein includes Service Levels B, C, and D with their total levy
budgets for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 to be as follows:
SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET
Service Level B $ 321,899.00
Service Level C $ 559,842.00
Service Level D
$2,3 17,653.00
RATE LEVEL PARCEL CHARGE
N/A $ 25.68
C-1 $ 46.00
C-2 $ 89.00
C-3 $116.00
C-4 $175.00
$172.56
TOTAL TCSD LEVY
FOR SERVICE LEVELS
B, C, ANDD:
$3,199,394.00
r: \yasinobk\t~sdre,o.99 062299
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL
R - STREET AND ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICE DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND
ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,
1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District CTCSD"), to
provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD
has presetibed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has
elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same
persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the
TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By
previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the maintenance
of streets and roads for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a
written report CKeport") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Keport
contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and
charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of
Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including
necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed
rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated
herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the
TCSD, and is available for public inspection.
Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing
of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed
rates and charges. Notice of the public heating was mailed and published as required by law and
affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD.
Section 5. On June 22, 1999, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing
on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public heating, the Board of Directors
heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested
r:\yasiaobk\t~sdr~o.99 062299
person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of
such rates and charges.
Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the
District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable cost
of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1999-2000.
Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and
protests and adopts the rates and charges for the street and road maintenance services for Fiscal
Year 1999-2000 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal
Year 1999-2000.
Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in
the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property
taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time
and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws
applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to,
those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption,
are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code
Section 483 1. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the
charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a
bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on
which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien
against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the
classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, or claims that an error has been
made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates
and charges to the owner' s property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy
by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999,
pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of
classification or correction of errors program.
Section 10. Ira property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that
payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a
hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to
procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal
program.
Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 1999,
the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not
exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered,
r:\yasinobk\tcsdreso.99 062299
authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as
shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor.
Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and
collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public
Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates
and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD.
Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 22na day of June, 1999.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Distdct Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS
r: \yasinobk\t~dre~o.99 062299
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL R
On July 1, 1998, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the
Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year
1999-2000. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the
Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seq., the TCSD
has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to
provide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and
description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that
provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels
contained within that service level, as follows:
Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance
of streets and roads.
The Financial Analysis contained herein includes the Service Level R total levy budget for Fiscal
Year 1999-2000 to be as follows:
SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET
RATE LEVEL
PARCEL CHARGE
Service Level R
TOTAL TCSD LEVY
FOR SERVICE LEVEL R:
$11,657.00
$11,657.00
R-1 Improved $115.26
R-1 Unimproved $ 57.64
R-2 Improved $121.92
R-2 Unimproved $ 60.96
r:\yaalnobk\t~sdm.99 062299
CITY OF TEMECULA
_ ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Temecula Community Services District
TCSD
Fiscal Year 1999~2000
INTENT MEETING:
PUBLIC HEARING:
May 11,1999
June 22,1999
Corporate Office
28765 Single Oak Drive
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
Tel: (909) 699-3990
Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864)
Fax: (909) 699-3460
/14BIA
/HUNIFINANCIAL
www.muni.com
Regional Offices
Jacksonville, FL
· Kansas City, MO
· Sacramento
· San Francisco
· Seattle, WA
· Washington, DC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1
PLANS AND SPECIFIACTIONS .............................................................................3
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES ........................................... 3
BUDGET AND LEVY SUMMARY ...................................................................................3
DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGE~ ...........................................................................5
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ................................................................................9
A. RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT (PRIOR TO 1999/2000) .............................9
B. MODIFICA ONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 ................................. 9
TI
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS ............................................................................................12
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ..........................................................................15
APPENDIX A -- 1999~2000 COLLECTION ROLL .......................................................17
INTRODUCTION
Upon incorporation of the City-of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District
("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction
previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the
District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the
City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the
District. The District collects property-related fees and charges (Charges) in
order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The
District was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the
Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government
Code ("CSD Law").
Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the
Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the
Di trict and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in
'thee Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service
properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the
corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and
include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is
charged for the services provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as
well as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District.
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the District has
prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting
(Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level
C), refuse collection (Service Level D), and road improvement and maintenance
(Service Level R) services furnished by the District, and has elected to have
these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the
same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from,
its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections
61765.2 to 61765,6, inclusive.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual Levy
Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service
Level B, Service Level C and Service Level D Rates and Charges for the parcels
and territories within the District.
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property
assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's
Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and
specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District
services.
A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an
· opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration
of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and
~ review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments
to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the
Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and
collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. In such case, the levy
information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and
included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in
Fiscal Year 1999~2000.
II.
PLANS AND SPECIFIACTIONS
General Description of th~ District and Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and
includes all parcels within the City of Temecula. The District provides certain
property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate
and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the
District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the
parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services
provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the
service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread
among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is
provided. Services and improvements provided through the District include
residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection;
a refuse and recycling collection program; and road improvement
construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
· Residential Street Lighting
· Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
· Refuse Collection
· Road Improvement and Maintenance
Budget and Levy Summary
Each Service Level provides different and specific services and
improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the
services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the
Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy
Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly
proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The
"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel
count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete
description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for
each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment.
3
ii
C:
0
LU
0
0
0
0
~ 0
.~ ~
f-
._~
::3
.c:
C:
0
e-.
e-
.c:
e-
Z
C. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting -- includes all developed
single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the
District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local
street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level
B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the
following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 1999/2000.
Service Level B Tracts
11087-01 20079-00 2088~00 21674-00 22761-00 23267-00 24134-00
11087-02 20079-01 20882-00 21674-01 22762-00 23267-01 24134-01
12189-01 20079-02 20882-01 21674-02 22786-00 23267-02 24134-02
12189-02 20079-03 20882-02 21674-03 22915-00 23267-03 24134-03
12189-03 20130-00 20882-03 21675-00 22915-01 23267-04 24135-00
12189-04 20130-01 20987-00 21675-01 22915-02 23371-01 24135-01
12189-05 20130-02 21067-00 21675-02 22915-03 23371-02 24135-02
12189-06 20130-03 21082-00 21675-03 22916-00 23371-03 24135-03
12189-07 20130-04 21082-01 21675-04 22916-01 23371-04 24182-01
13060-01 20130-05 21082-02 21675-05 22916-02 23371-05 24184-01
13060-02 20130-06 21082-03 21675-06 22916-03 23371-06 24184-F
13060-03 20153-00 21082-04 21760-00 22962-00 23371-07 24185-01
13060-04 20154-00 21340-00 21765-00 23100-01 23371-09 24186-01
13060-05 20319-00 21340-01 21818-00 23100-02 23371-10 24186-02
13060-06 20643-00 21340-02 22148-00 23100-03 23371-11 24186-F
13060-07 20644-00 21340-03 22203-00 23100-04 23371-14 24232-00
13060-08 20703-01 21340-04 22204-00 23100-05 23483-00 25004-01
18518-00 20703-02 21340-05 22208-00 23101-01 24131-00 27827-00
18518-01 20703-03 21340-06 22593-00 23101-02 24131-01 27827-01
18518-02 20735-01 21340-07 22593-01 23101-04 24131-02 27827-02
18518-03 20735-02 21430-01 22593-02 23125-00 24131-03 27827-03
18583-00 20735-03 21561-00 22627-00 23125-01 24132-00 28309-00
19872-00 20735-04 21672-01 22627-01 23125-02 24132-01
19872-01 20735-05 21672-02 22715-00 23125-03 24133-00
19872-02 20735-06 21672-03 22715-01 23126-00 24133-01
19872-03 20735-07 21672-04 22715-02 23128-00 24133-02
19872-04 20735-08 21673-00 22716-00 23142-00 24133-03
19872-05 20735-09 21673-01 22716-01 23177-00 24133-04
19939-00 20848-00 21673-02 22716-02 23220-00 24133-05
19939-01 20879-00 21673-03 22716-03
19939-02 20879-01 22716-04
5
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance --
includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant
parcels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and
maintenance of perimeteF landscaped areas and slopes within the public
right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with
certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required within
these tracts and subdivisions vary depending on operating costs, and
therefore four (4) rate levels have been established within Service Level C.
The rate and charges for.each of the four service levels in Service Level C
are as follows:
· C-1 is currently charged $46.00
· C-2 is currently charged $89.00
· C-3 is currently charged $116.00
· C-4 is currently charged $175.00
The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential parcel and
shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for
Fiscal Year 1999/2000.
Tract Name
PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT
Service Level C Tracts
Rate Level C-1
Tract Numbers
23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00
26861-02 26861-03
22593-00 22593-01
20879-00 20879-01
RANCHO SOLANA
THE VINEYARDS
26861-01
22593-02
MONTE VISTA
28309-00
6
Tract Name
MORRISON HOMES
RIDGEVIEW
WINCHESTER CREEK
WOODCREST COUNTRY
Tract Name
o ylARTINIQUE
RANCHO HIGHLANDS
SADDLEWOOD
VINTAGE HILLS
22148-00
Rate Level C-2
Tract Numbers
20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 20881-00 21764-00
20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06
21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06
21340-07
21561-00 22208-00
Rate Level C-3
Tract Numbers
23128-00
20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00
18518-00 18518-01 18518-02 18518-03
22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03
22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01
22916-02 22916-03
Tract Name
BARCLEY ESTATES
MEADOW VIEW
SIGNET SERIES
TRADEWI N DS
VILLAGE GROVE
Rate Level C-4
Tract Numbers
25004-01
21765-00
20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03
23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03
21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21673-01 21673-02
21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06
7
Service Level D, Refuse Collection -- provides for the operation and
administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District.
The current rate and cha~'~es for Service Level D is $172.56 per single family
residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be applied to all
parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Pursuant
to Proposition 218, the District may increase the rate and charges for this
service after conducting an additional protest hearing on the matter. Mailed
ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and
charges.
Service Level R, Roads -- provides funding for construction, improvement,
service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the District.
The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or
restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-
grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads.
All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services
provided. The costs associated with the services are proportionately spread
among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level R.
Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance
required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore
separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of
the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with
servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
Rate Level R-1 --The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy-
five (75) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets
that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level
provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road;
Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.068
miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area.
Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-six (56)
assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are
serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road;
Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are
serviced and maintained in this area.
8
III.
CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are
not limited to: changes or exlgansion in the existing improvements or in the types
of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of
the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels;
or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the
District that affect the levy are outlined in the following.
A. Recent Modifications to the District (Prior to I 999~2000)
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund
citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service
Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District.
· Community Services, Parks, and Recreation -- that provided for the
maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation
· ,, services within the City.
Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians -- that provided
servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped
medians along arterial streets.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced
by the Special Tax and no longer charged through the District.
B. Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year '1999~2000
The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 is
related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services
as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed,
the District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing.
Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts
are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and
services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development
specific and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included
in these two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements.
Additionally, individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D
when a new single family residential unit is identified.
Service Level B
Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include the 1,068
residential parcels within-the following Tracts:
Tract Number Tract Number Tract Number
Number of Parcels Number of Parcels Number of Parcels
23371-05 74 23371-11 112 24185-01 109
23371-06 28 23371-14 24 24186-01 187
23371-07 45 24182-01 95 24186-02 51
23371-09 67 24184-01 79 24186-02 115
23371-10 25 24184-F 57
As of the Intent Meeting on May 11, 1999, the new Assessor's Parcel
Numbers (APN's) for the individual residential parcels and lots within several
of the above referenced tracts have not been identified from currently
available Assessor's secured roll information. For purposes of this report, the
APN's currently identified on the secured roll for these tracts are charged for
Service Level B based on the number of residential lots and parcels to be
created within those tracts. The following is a list of the Tracts and their
corresponding APN's currently identified:
Tract
Number
· 23371-07
· 23371-09
· 23371-10
· 23371-11
· 23371-14
· 24182-01
· 24184-01
· 24184-F
· 24186-F
Current
APN's
953-340-002
953-350-006 and Portion of 953-050-020
Portion of 953-050-020
Portion of 953-050-020
953-350-008
Portion of 950-020-021 and 950-020-022:
(These two APN's will also be subdivided into Tracts 24182-02
and 24182-03)
Portion of 950-020-013 and 950-020-014
Portion of 950-020-013 and 950-020-014
950-020-047
The new APN's for each of the individual residential lots for these tracts
should be established by the time the levy is submitted to the County for
Fiscal Year 1999/2000. The Service Level B rates and charges to be applied
to the above referenced tracts and subdivision were previously approved by
the property owners and adopted by the Board for inclusion.
10
. /
Service Level C
Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes) for Fiscal
Year 1999/2000 are identified in the following.
· Rate level #1 --Tract 28309-00 (46 residential parcels).
° Rate level #2 -- No New Tracts.
° Rate level # 3 -- No New Tracts.
° Rate level # 4 -- No New Tracts.
All Service Level C rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced
tracts and subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and
adopted by the Board for inclusion.
Service Level D
A total of 351 new developed residential parcels have been added to
Service Level D (Refuse Collection) for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. New single
family residential units are identified each year and included in Service Level
D based on updated County Assessor's data, City building permits and the
waste hauler's updated service records.
The actual cost per household last year for this service was $170.64. For
Fiscal Year 1999/2000, the rate and charge is proposed to be $172.56, an
increase of $1.92 for actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise
agreement with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R).
Service Level R
There are no new Inclusions to Service Level R (Roads), proposed for the
current fiscal year. However, sixteen (16) parcels have been removed from
Service Level R-l, as this service is no longer provided to these parcels. The
sixteen parcel removed from Service Level R-1 for Fiscal Year 1999/2000
are listed below.
957-130-001
957-130-006
957-130-016
957-150-009
957-130-002
957-130-007
957-130-017
957-150-017
957-130-003
957-130-013
957-130-020
957-150-018
957-130-004
957-130-015
957-150-005
957-340-008
11
DISTRICT BUDGETS
The Tables on the next three (3) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
1999/2000. - -
1999~2000 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2000
BUDGET ITEM Account Level B I Level C Level D I Level R I Total
' No. 192 193 194 195 District
PERSONNEL SERV1CES
Salaries and Wages 5100 $0 $104,847 $27,337 $0 $132,184
Deferred Compensation 5101 0 0 0 0 0
PERS Retirement 5102 0 0 0 0 0
State Unerrl:doyment 5103 0 0 0 0 0
MecJicaJW FICA 5104 0 0 0 0 0
Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0
Unemployment Training Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0
Disability Insurance 5110 0 0 0 0 0
Workers Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0
Health Insurance 5113 0 0 0 0 0
Terrfporary Help 5118 0 0 0 0 0
Part-'lirne (Project) 5119 0 8,476 0 0 8,476
Overtime Wages 5121 0 700 0 0 700
Subtotal (Personnel Services) $0 $114,023 $27,337 $0 $141,360
12
1999/2000 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Gommunity Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2000
~ No. 192 193 194 195
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Telephone Service (Cellular) 5208 $0 $0 $0 $0
Repair & Maint. - Facilities 5212 0 53,225 0 0
Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 5214 0 0 0 0
Repair & Maint.-Office Equipment 5217 0 0 0 0
Maintenance Supplies ~218 0 0 0 0
Office Supplies 5220 0 0 O 0
Pdnting 5222 0 0 0 0
Legal Documents/Maps 5224 0 0 0 0
Eledjon Costs (Offset by developer deposits) 5225 1,600 1,000 0 0
Dues and Memberships 5226 0 0 2,610 0
Publications 5228 0 0 0 0
Postagqland Packaging 5230 0 0 0 0
Pmpedy Tax Adrnin Fees 5231 1,500 850 1,800 80
Rent - Fadlities 5234 0 0 0 0
Rent - Equipment 5238 0 0 0 0
Equipment Lease 5239 0 0 0 0
Utilities 5240 0 140,600 0 0
Small tools/Equipment 5242 0 0 0 0
Uniforms 5243 0 0 0 0
Signs 5244 0 0 0 0
Legal Services 5240 0 0 0 0
Consulting Services 5248 0 20,000 0 0
Other Outside Services 5250 0 0 0 0
Advertising 5254 0 0 1,500 0
Public Notices 5250 4,600 2, 100 5,200 0
Conferences 5238 0 0 0 0
Professional Meetings 5260 0 0 0 0
Staff Training/Education 5261 0 0 0 0
Mileage 5262 0 0 0 0
Fuel Expense. City Vehicles 5263 0 0 0 0
Coundl Discretionary 5267 0 0 0 0
Blueprints 5238 0 0 0 0
Subtotal (5200's) $7,100 $217,775 $11,110 $80
Total
Dtstrlct
$0
53.225
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,600
2,610
0
0
4,230
0
0
0
140,600
0
0
0
0
20,000
0
1,500
11,900
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$236,66S
13
1999~2000 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Gommunity Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2000
} No. 192 193 194 195 District
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Recreation Supplies 5301 $0 $0 $0 $6 $0
Waste Hauling 5315 0 0 2,317,653 0 2,317,653
Street Lighting 5319 323,000 0 0 0 323,000
Insurance 5330 0 0 0 0 0
Vehicles 7335 0 0 0 0 0
Information Systems 5340 0 0 0 0 0
Support Sewices 5345 0 0 0 0 0
Fadlities 5350 0 0 0 0 0
Assessment Engineering 5370 0 0 0 0 0
Refund of Pdor Year Assessments 5375 0 0 0 0 0
City0Ad~in Charges 5380 0 0 0 0 0
Subl~tals (5300's) $323,000 $0 $2,317,653 $0 $2,640,653
Operating Expenses 5400 0 0 ~ 0 0
Emergencey Road Maintenance 5402 0 0 0 17,077
Landscape Maintenance 5415 0 297,900 0 0
Landscape Rehabilitation 5416 0 0 0 0
Subtotals (5400's) $0 $297,900 $0 $11,077
0
17,077
297,900
0
$314,977
TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS
$330,700 $629,698 $2,353,100 $17,157 $3,333,655
EXPENDITURES
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS 330,700 629,698 2,356,100 17,157 3,333,655
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $330,700 $629,698 $2,356,100 $17,157 $3,333,656
REVENUES
OTHER REVENUE SOURCES 8,801 35.000 14,000 500 58,301
FUND BALANCE 0 34,856 24,447 5,000 64,303
BALANCE TO LEVY 321,899 559,942 2,311,653 11,657 3,211,051
TOTAL REVENUES $330,700 $629,698 $2,356,100 $17,157 $3,333,655
14
VIi
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly
distributed among each assessable property.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by
the per parcel method.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping
and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse):
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels.
. I
Service Level R (Roads):
Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units -- 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) -- Parcel Charge
The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL B
JParcel
Property Type Unit
Single Family Residential ~ 1.00
Single Family Vacant 1.00
lCharge per
XParcel
$25.68
$25.68
ParcelCharge r Multiplier
~$25.68 l Per Parcel
$25.68 Per Parcel
15
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Parcel
Property Type Unit
Single Family Residential Rate C-1 1.00
~ingle Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00
Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00
Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00
$46.00
89.00
116.00
$175.00
Parcel ~
Charge Multiplier
$46.00 Per Parcel
89.00 Per Parcel
116.00 Per Parcel
$175.00 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHAliCE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL D
Property Type
~;ingle Family Residential
Parcel Charge per
Unit X Parcel
1.00 ~ $172.56
Parcel
Charge Multiplier
)$172.56 1 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL R
IParcel
Property Type Unit
Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00
Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50
Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00
Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50
I
Charge
X per Unit
$115.26
115.26
121.92
$121.92
= I Parcel
Charge I Multiplier
$115.26 Per Parcel
57.64 Per Parcel
121,92 Per Parcel
$60.96 Per Parcel
16
Appendix A -- 199912000 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessor's rn'~fp for the year in which this report is prepared.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to
the C~ity Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report.
17
ITEM 7
TY ATTORNAEPYPROV~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of Directors
~-~~erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
Temecula Valley Museum, Interior Exhibit Design
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve in its substantial form the interior
exhibit design concepts for the Temecula Valley Museum.
BACKGROUND: In October, 1998 the Temecula City Council awarded a Consultant
Services Agreement to Think, Jacobson and Roth, a Los Angeles based firm, to develop a
conceptual designs of intedor exhibits, fabricate the exhibits and install the exhibits at the Temecula
Valley Museum.
A design committee was formed which consisted of Council Member Jeff Comerchero, Council
Member Ron Roberts, Community Services Commissioner Tom Edwards, representatives from
Temecula Valley Museum, Inc., Pechanga and City staff. The committee's goal was to work
with our consultant to develop a plan for the interior exhibits of the museum. Three meetings
were publicly noticed and held regarding the design of the exhibit area, with input from those
in attendance and committee members. The consultant's developed a story line, .which
portrays Temecula's rich historic past and exhibit concepts, which the committee has reviewed
and approved. On June 14, 1999, the Community Services Commission reviewed and
approved the interior exhibit designs as well. For tonight's meeting, Lori Jacobson and Carla
Roth of Think, Jacobson and Roth, are here to present the committee's final concepts to be
developed and installed in our new museum.
This item requests the Board's approval of the intedor exhibit area. With approval of the Board of
Directors fabrication and installation of the exhibits will begin.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the conceptual designs of the interior exhibits will have no
additional fiscal impact.
R:~,IOLERO~PORI1TVMI Exhibit D~siZn.doc
II
THE LAND OWNERS
~rom the ~79os through the late ~8oos a series ofvery
significant changes in control or ownership of Temecula
Valley lands occurred. The native Temecula Indians'
daily life, manner of producing food, and religious system
was forever changed with the rounding of the nearby
San Luis Rey Mission in ~798. Less than four decades
later, in ~835, both the missions and local Indians were
greatly impacted when the Mexican government
secularized, or sectioned off for settlement, all California
mission lands. Then in ~848, at the end of the Mexican
War, control of all of California and most of the present
day Southwest was transferred to the United States.
The struggles for control did not end there. For more
than 75 years after the arrival of the first Europeans in
the Valley, the native Temecula Indians were !argel'y able
to remain on the lands they had occupied for centuries.
In September ~875, however, this ended with the delivery
of an eviction notice to the nearly 4oo occupants of the
Temecula Indian village.
Introductory Text Pane[
21" wide x 24" high
ITEM 8
CITY
DIR.
CITY
APPROVAL
ATTORNEY
OF FINANCE
MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
8oard of Directors
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting General Manager
June 22, 1999
Review and Approval of the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
DISCUSSION: The proposed FY 1999-00 TCSD operating budget includes the operation and
maintenance of district-wide parks and recreation facilities, debt service on the certificates of
participation issued for the construction of the Community Recreation Center, artedal street lighting
and traffic signals, and median landscaping. Rates and charges are also established for residential
street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency street and
road construction and maintenance.
Parks and recreation services, as well as artedal street lighting and traffic signals, and median
landscaping are pdmadly funded by the special tax assessed to property owners as approved by the
voters as 'Measure C" in March, 1997. The maximum level of special tax that was approved by the
voters is $74.44 per single-family dwelling unit. Over the past two years the special tax rate has
been reduced to $68.44 per dwelling unit, with the $6.00 per dwelling unit difference being funded
by the City's General Fund through the Revenue Excess Shadng for Temecula ("REST") program.
The proposed FY 1999-00 budget reflects no change in the existing special tax rate. This special
tax will result in projected revenues of $2,592,190.
Residential street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency
street and road construction and maintenance services provided by the TCSD are funded pdmadly
by rates and charges assessed to property owners within the District. No changes are proposed in
any of the service level rates and charges, other than a $1.92 per year increase in the Service Level
"D" charge for refuse collection due to a Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment. The total revenue
to be generated by these rates and charges is projected to be $3,203,810.
As discussed above, the REST program contribution from the City's General Fund is proposed to
be increased from the current level of $850,020 in FY 1998-99 to $1,176,000 in FY 1999-00 (an
increase of $325,980).
The operating budget for the TCSD totals $7,957,230 (a $289,576 or 3.8% increase from FY 1998-
99), and by fund is as follows:
Parks and Recreation
Service Level "A" (Adedal Street Lighting)
Service Level "B" (Residential Street Lighting)
Service Level "C" (Slope Maintenance)
Service Level "D" (Refuse Hauling)
Service Level "R" (Street and Road Maintenance)
Debt Service
Total
$ 3,826,650
298,390
335,700
630,100
2,348,960
17,160
500.270
$ 7,957230
PARKS AND RECREATION
The proposed FY 1999-00 Parks and Recreation budget reflects an increase of $209,162 (5.8%)
from the current fiscal year, due primarily to the following:
· Operations and maintenance costs for three new park fadlities: Winchester Creek Park,
Margarita Community Park, and Temeku Hills Park
· Operations and maintenance costs for the Temecula Valley Museum ($153,790 annually)
· $42,500 in funding for the Ads Coundl to support the implementation of the Cultural Arts
Master Plan
SERVICE LEVEL "A" (ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING)
The proposed FY 199900 Service Level "A" budget reflects an increase of $15,172 (5.4%) from the
current fiscal year due pdmadly to additions to the City's adedal street lighting system.
SERVICE LEVEL "B" (RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING)
The proposed FY 1999-00 Service Level "B" budget reflects a $15,140 decrease (4.3%) from the
current fiscal year due primarily to personnel cost reductions.
SERVICE LEVEL 'C" (SLOPE MAINTENANCE)
The proposed FY 1999-00 Service Level "C' budget reflects a $6,892 increase (1.1%) from the
current fiscal year.
SERVICE LEVEL "D" (REFUSE HAULING1
The proposed FY 1999-00 Service Level "It budget reflects a $71,270 increase (3.1%) from the
current fiscal year due to an increase in the number of parcels receiving benefit.
2
SERVICE LEVEL 'R" (STREET AND ROAD MAINTENANCE)
The proposed FY 199900 Service Level "R" budget reflects a $3,930 increase (29.7%) from the
current fiscal year due to an increase in the number of parcels receiving benefit.
FISCAL IMPACT: The services provided by the District are funded pdmadly by the special tax
that was approved by the voters as Measure C in March, 1997, as wall as by the rates and charges
assessed to property owners which were approved during a public hearing held on June 22, 1999.
Attachments: Resolution No. CSD 99-__
Proposed FY 1999-00 Operating Budget
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 99-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING ~ FY 1999-00
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLIStlING CONTROLS ON
CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District has
reviewed the proposed final FY 1999-00 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings
as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District as follows:
Section 1. That the FY 1999-00 TCSD operating budget is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the General Manager.
C. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from
the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The Board of Directors must authorize any increase in regular personnd positions
above the level indicated in the final budget. The General Manager may authorize the hiring of
temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of Directors action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the General
Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of
Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Board of Directors action, except that the General
Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Board in mounts
up to project contingency established by the Board.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the District books at June 30, 1999 are
hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 1999-00.
Section 4. The Board Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22"a day ofhne, 1999.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
District Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIYORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 99- was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22~d day of June,
1999, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
AYES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
BOARDMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
District Secretary/City Clerk
PROPOSED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET-
FY 1999-00
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
City of Temecula
REFENUES BY FUND - CO,~!,~!UNITY SERtqCES DISTRICT
Actual Actual
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98
Parks and Recreation $ 3,359,968 $ 3,565,438 $
Service Level A 196,788 222,620
Service Level B 273,242 281,122
Service Level C 535,273 586,656
Service Level D 1,868,205 2,071,042
Service Level R 19,220 19,354
Debt Service * 36,487 36,010
Total $ 6,289, 183 $ 6,782,242 $
Estimated
FY 1998-99
3,632,610
281,800
313,840
591,180
2,277,690
12,880
35,600
7, 145,600
Projeaed
FY 1999410
4,119,060
297,530-
335,700
594,840
2,324,410
12,160
35,600
7,719,300
* Does not. include operating transfer from Parks and Recreation.
FOUR YEAR COMPARISON
$6,289,183 ]
$6,782,242 ~ .
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
Actual FY 1996~7 Actual FY 1997~8
[] Parks and Recreation [] Service Level A
· Service Level D I~! Service Level R
Estimated FY 1998-99
r'l Service Level B
· Debt Service
Projected FY 1999-00
[] Service Level C
EXPENDITURE ,~UAIJ/ARY BY CATEGORY- COIi/~!UNITY ,.~ERVICF~ DI~I'RICT' FFND$
Operations
Fund Personnel & Maintenance
Parks and R~creation* $ 1,578,870 $ 2,219,280 $
S~vice Level A 2,890 29~,500
Service Level B 335,700
S~vicc Level C 114,420 515,680
S~rvic¢ Level D 27,440 2,321,520
Setvic~ Level R 17,160
Debt Service 500.270
Total $ 1.723.620 $ 6.205.110 $
Capital
Outlay
28,500 $
28.500 S
Operating
Transfers
Total
3,826,650
298,390
335,700
630,100
2,348,960
17,160
500,270
7.957.230
* Does not include $464,670 operating transfer to Ihe Debt S~'vice Fund.
Service Level D
(S2,34S,960
Service Level R
($13,230)
Debt Service ($S00a70)
Parks and Recreation
(53,826,650)
Service Level C /
($630,100)
Service Levd B
($350,g40)
~._Service Level A
(s298,39o)
City of Temecula '
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continued)
Other Sources:
Operating Transfers In
LonR-terlTi Debt
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures (Appropriations)
Other Uses:
Operating Transfers Out
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over
(Under) Expenditures and Other Uses
Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999
Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000 '
Designations:
Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies
Continuing Appropriation
Debt Servi~e
Reserves:
Encumbrances
Long-term Receivables
Debt Service
Um'eserved Fund Balance/Equily,
June 30, 2000
Parks &
Recreation
$ 4, 119,060 $
4, 119,060
(3,826,650)
(464,670)
Community. Services DialHa
Service Service
Level A Level B
29'~,530 $ 335,700
Service
Levd C
594,840
297,530 335,700 594,840
(298,390) (335,700) (630,100)
(172,260) (860) (35,260)
870.380 25,958 10,182 324,917
698,120 25,098 10,182 28~657
698,120 25,098 10,182 289,657
City of Temecula
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continuea)
Sources:
op~ti.s T~f~ 1.
CommunHy Service Dbtrict
Service Service
Levd D Level R
2,324,410 S 12,160 $
Debt
Service
3~,600
464,670
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures (Appropriations)
Other Uses:
Operating Transfem Out
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over
(Under) Expenditures and Olhcr Us~
Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999
Fund BalancedEquily, June 30, 2000
Designations:
Economic Uncertainty/Comingencies
Continuing Appropriations
Debt Service
Reserves:
Encumbrances
long-term Receivables
Debt Service
Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity,
June 30. 2000
2,324,410 12, 160 500,270
(2,348,960) (17,160) (500,270)
(24,550) (5,000)
I g6.793 11.002
162,243 6,002
162,243 6,002
529.020
529,105
26,415
502,690
Ci .tv of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES
I
RECREATION
SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF
COh/IMUN1TY SERVICES
Herman D. Parker
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Phyllis Ruse
- I I
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
I
MAINTENANCE
SERVICES
-- Youth & Adult
Sports
-- Special Events
-- Volunteer &
Cultural Services
-- Teen &
Recreational
Services
-- Senior & Human
Services
-- Park Acquisition
-- Park Development
-- Assessment
Administration
-- Development
Review
-- Solid Waste
Adminisu'ation
-- Cable Television
Franchise Administration
-- Park Maintenance
-- Median Maintenance
-- Slope Maintenance
-- Facility Maintenance
C~ o./' Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES
Funding Source:
PARKS AND RECREATION*
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations and Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
Actual
FY 1996-97
1,124,006
1,628,368
22.846
~'.775.220
Actual
FY 1997-98
Special Tax
Benefit Assessments
General Fund
Budgeted
FY 1999-98
Proposed
FY 1999-00
1,237,077 $ 1,467,120 $' 1,578,870
1,734,118 2,134,868 2,219,280
2.759 15,500 28,500
$ 3.617.488 $
$ 2.973.954
3.826.650
SERVICE LEVEL A
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations and Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total $
Actual
FY 1996-97
Actual
FY1997-98
Budgeted
FY 1999-98
2.678 $ 2,776 $ 2,850
194,303 208,890 280,368
196.981
$ 283.218
$ 211.666
Proposed
FY 1999-00
$ 2,890
295,500
$ 298.390
SERVICE LEVEL B
Actual
Exl~enditure Summary FY 1996-97
Personnel $ 6,839
Operations and Maintenance 280,124
Capital Outlay
Total $ 286.963
Actual
FY 1997-98
$ 6,839
292,816
$ 299.655
Budgeted
FY 1999-98
$ '7,430
343,410
$ 350.840
Proposed
FY 1999-00
$ 335,700
$ 335.700
*Does not include operating transfers out.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERFICES
SERVICE LEVEL C
Actual
Expenditure Summary. FY 1996-97
Personnel $ 113,930
Operations and Maintenance 440,037
Capital Outlay
Total $ 553.967
Actual
FY 1997-98
$ 92,441
435,837
$ 528.278
Budgeted
FY 1999-98
$ 119,490
503,718
$ 623.208
Proposed
FY 1999-00
$ 114,420.
515,680
$ 630.100
SERVICE LEVEL D
Actual
Expenditure Summan.' FY 1996-97
Personnel $ 43,846
Operations and Maintenance 1.754, 111
Capital Outlay
Total $ 1.797.957
Actual
FY 1997-98
$ 39,736
2,080,080
$ 2.119.816
Budgeted
FY 1999-98
$ 43,680
2,234,010
$ 2.277.690
Proposed
FY 1999-00
$ 27,440
2,321,520
$ 2.348.960
SERVICE LEVEL R
Expenditure Summary
Personnel.
Opcrations and MaintCnancc
Capital Outlay
Total
DEBT SERVICE
Expenditure Summ'4n.'
Personnel
Operations and Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
Actual
FY 1996-97
Actual
FY 1997-98
Budgeted
FY 1999-98
$ 9,940 $ 20,931 $ 13,230
$ 9.940 $ 20.93 1 $ 13.230
Actual
FY 1996-97
$ 501,600
Actual
FY 1997-98
$ 500,995 $
$ 500.995 $
$ 501.600
Budgeted
FY 1999-98
501,980
501.980
Proposed
FY1999-00
$ 17,160
$ 17.160
Proposed
FY 1999-00
$ 500,270
$ 500.270
7
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y - COMMUNITY SERFICES
Personnel Allocation
PARKS AND RECREATION
Director of Community Services
Deputy Director of Community Services
Maintenance Superintendent
Development Services Administrator
Recreation Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Development Services Analyst
Senior Landscape Inspector
Museum Services Manager
Recreation Supervisor
Administrative Secretary
Recreation Coordinator
Landscape Inspector
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Worker
Office Assistant
Custodian
Total
Authorized
1998-99
1.00
1.00
0.70
0.75
1.00
0.95
0.00
0.40
1.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
2.10
1.00
16.90
Changes
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
(0.25)
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
1.50
0.50
0.20
0.00
2.55
Proposed
1999-00
1.00
1.00
0.70
0.80
1.00
0.70
0.20
0.50
1.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
0.25
1.50
1.50
2.30
1.00
19.45
SERVICE LEVEL A
~Development Services Analyst
SERVICE LEVEL B
Development Services 'Analyst
Office Assistant
Total
0.05
0.10
0.O5
0.15
0.00
(0.1 O)
(0.05)
(0.15)
0.05 ' .
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ci0, of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES'
Personnel Allocation
SERVICE LEVEL C
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Senior Landscape Inspector
Development Services Analyst
Landscape Inspector
Office Assistant
Total
SERVICE LEVEL D
Development Services Administrator
Development Services AnalySt
Office Assistant
Total
Community Sen'ices Total
Authorized
1998-99
0.05
'0.05
0.60
'0.70
0.00
0.25
1.65
0.25
0.15
0.50
0.90
19.65
Changes
0.00
(0.05)
(o.~o~
(0.10)
0.50
0.05
0.30
(0.05)
0.00
(0.40)
(0.45)
2.25
Proposed
1999-00
'0.05
0.00
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.30
1.95
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.45
21.90
9
Ci.tv of Temecula
DEPARTA4ENT SUMMARY- COAtAIUNITY SERVICES
Program: Recreation Services
MISSION:
The Recreation Services Program is responsible for providing a comprehensive, Citywide
recreation program that meets the recreation and human service nee~ls within the
community.
1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
· Developed and implemented a marketing plan for the Citywide volunteer program.'
· Increased the number of excursion opportunities offered to Temecula residents.
· Developed and implemented a Citywide special events banner display program.
GOAL 1:
OBJECTIVE:
GOAL 2:
OBJECTIVE:
GOAL 3:
OBJECTIVE:
GOAL 4:
OBJECTIVE:
GOAL 5:
OBJECTIVES:
INCREASE THE 'NUMBER OF STAFF TRAININGS OR WORKSHOP
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PROJECT EMPLOYEES.
Increase the number of staff trainings or workshop opporUmities by six (6). Training
opportunities may include, but are not limited to, computer training, safety training,
customer service training, etc.
INCREASE THE NUMBER OF FAMILY ORIENTED PROGRAMS AT THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER.
Increase the number of family oriented program opportunities at the Temecula
Community Center by four (4). Programs may include, but are not limited to,
Family Fun Nights, excursions, family barbecues, etc.
EXPLORE POSSIBLE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AT THE
PROMENADE MALL SCHEDULED TO OPEN NOVEMBER 1999.
Determine the feasibility of providing City-sponsored recreation oppontmities at the
Promenade Mall site. Opportunities may include, but are not limited to, Story Time
for Kids, Musical Presentations, Art Exhibits, etc.
IMPLEMENT THE "TEMECULA PRIDE" CAMPAIGN.
Implement a comprehensive campaign that educates and encourages Temecula
residents to respect, enjoy, and maintain their community. Special events, bumper
stickers, special recognition awards are several suggested avenues for promotions.
IMPLEMENT MUSEUM OPERATIONS AND SERVICES
· :.Complete the fabrication and installation of exhibits and other interior amenities.
· :.Hire a Museum Administrator.
· :. Work with the Temecula Valley Museum to provide decent services and operate the
museum for a determined number of hours per week.
· :. Provide museum tours for school field trips.
iO
Ci .ty of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMlqAR Y- COA~MUNITY SER FICES
Program: Recreation Services (Continued)
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Numbc[ of staff trainings or workshop
opportunities for all project staff
Number of family oriented programs at the
Temecula Com:nunity Center
Number of recreational opportunities at the
future Promenade Mall
Nmnbcr of "Temecula Pride" campaign
promotional materials
PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED
FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99
PROJECTED
FY 1999/00
4 4 4 10
N/A N/A 2 4
N/A N/A N/A 4
N/A N/A 2 4
11
City of Temecula
DEPARTA4ENT SUA,tMARY- COAdMUNITY SERVICE
Program: Development Services
MISSION:
The Development 5endces Program is responsible for parksite acquisition and
development, a.~ssn~nt engineerin~ development review, and solid waste and cable
television franchise administration.
1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
· Began construction of the Margarita Community Park sad Phase H of Temecula '
Duck Pond
· Completed construction of Winchester Creek Park
· Completed plans for the Santa C, ertrmtis Creek Trail
· Hired an employee, through the City Clerk's department, who will assist the
division in a pubic education program.
GOAL 1:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 2:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 3:
OBJECTIVES:
PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE AND BALANCED NEIGHBORHOOD AND
COMMUNITY PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITH~S SYSTEM
THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF TEMECULA.
Complete construction of a school ballfield fighting project.
Complete installation of new tot lot equipment and play surface at Rancho California
Sports Park.
· ~' Complete the design for lhe Senior Center Expansion Project.
,0, Complete the construction of the ~ court at ButWrfield S~age Park
· ~, Condition development projects to provide parkland and recreational facilities that · meet City. standards. ' '
IMPLEMENT A COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-USE TRAILS MASTER PLAN.
~, Develop a Multi-Use Trails Master Pia~
~ Complete construction of Santa Genredis unde~cwssing at Winchester Road.
,~ Accept easements from the Metropolitan Water District and other agencies for Waft
uses.
IMPLEMENT THE TEMECULA LIBRARY MASTER PLAN.
Identify and secure funding for the consUuction of the library facility.
Complete the construction documents for the libra~, and bid the project
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICES
Program: Development Serv/ces (Coatinuea)
OBJECTIVES:
MANAGE THE REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND INSPECT
DEVELOPER AND CITY CONSTRUCTED PARKS, TRAILS AND
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.
Ensure that developer and City built pafa, trails and recreational projects are
designed and constructed in accordance with City / TCSD standards.
Train a tecimician to sssist in plan review and i~ion.
Enimnce coordination between Community Services and other City deparUncnts
during plan review and construction
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of new City parks and facilities
Number of Msster Plans completed
PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 1~ 1998/99 FY 1999/00
0 0 3 4
0 3 6 2
13
City of Temec~da
D EPAR TA4ENT SUMMARY- COMMUNITY SERVICE
MISSION:
The Maintenance 5errices Prograln is responsltle for providing effective landscape and
filcility :naintenance services to ~ $1ope~, Ii~dian~ recreation facilities and City
admini.~lltive of~ces.
1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
· Developed and implemented a service order request tvuaintemance system
* Established an effecl~ve by managemeat system
Provided o~-going ~ainln~ to 8taft oll the opetafioa of the City' s 8eClLrity system
· Established a Citywide alarm monitoring system for fwe and security
GOAL 1: PROVIDE
SYSTEM.
A SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE FACILITY, PARK AND TRAIL
OBJECTIVES:
~. Ensure performance compliance of the landscape mintenance contractors.
~. Develop pn'orities for site ~pairs, renovations and rehabilitation.
DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM TO REHABILITATE AGING
SLOPE AREAS.
OBXECTIVES:
GOAL3:
Identify slope areas that are in need of rehabilitation_
Ou~ine the required rehabilitation needs of each area identified.
Prioritize the implementation ~f the rehabilitation of each identified area.
DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT 'A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR CITY PARKS AND FACHATIES.
OBJECTIVES:
Inventory and asses the current condition of sites to be included in the progra~ .
Prioritize the implementation based on the immediate needs and budget limitations
of each site.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Avenge number of days to complete
general maintenance items
Number of facility parking lots receiving
annual preventative maintenance
Number of slope areas renovated
PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
FY 1997/98 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999100
N/A N/A 5 3
N/A N/A 2 3
N/A N/A 1 3
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY- COMMUNJTY SERVICE
Program: Debt Service
MISSION:
The Debt Service Program is the operaling budget for the Temecula Community Services
District Items budgeted include debt service principal and interest, property tax
admini.sU'ativc fees, and pass-through agreements.
1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
· All debt service and related costs for the 1992 Certificates of Participation ~vere
made in a timely manner
GOAL 1:
ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS.
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OFFINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
erman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
Departmental Report
Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
On January 25, 1999, the Community Services Department released a Request for
Qualifications for architectural design services for the expansion of the Mary Phillips Senior
Center. The proposed expansion will include kitchen upgrades and a 2,500 to 3,000 square
foot enlargement of the building to include additional space for meetings and classes. At the
March meeting, the Community Services Commission appointed a Commissioner to work with
staff on the design for the expansion for this facility. The first design committee meeting will
be held in July of 1999.
The Margarita Sidewalk Project is currently under construction. E.A. Mendoza is the
contractor. The improvements will include the installation of concrete curb and gutter,
landscaping, irrigation and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho
Vista Road and Pauba Road. Additionally, an ADA access ramp from Margarita Road to the
adjacent ballfields, and slope landscaping are included as part of the project. The project should
be completed by June 1999.
The City of Temecula Community Services Department brought forward to the TCSD Board of
Directors a Joint Use Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District for use of the
Temecula Valley High School Tennis Courts. The agreement was approved by the Board of
Education on August 18, 1998. The agreement provides for the lighting and maintenance of
eight tennis courts at Temecula Valley High School, by the City of Temecula, in exchange for
the use of the tennis courts in the City's overall parks and recreation program. Construction
should begin in mid June 1999 and completed by the end of August 1999.
R:~7.,IGLiltG~G)EFrRFI~9906 .do~
3ee~ 16, 1999
The City Council awarded a construction contract to Terra Cal Construction for the Phase II
improvements to the Temecula Duck Pond. This project is nearing the end of construction. The
park has been hydro-seeded. Staff anticipates the project will be in the 90-day maintenance
period by the end of June and the park should be dedicated in September of 1999.
Improvements include stabilization of the pond edge, walkways, landscape, irrigation,
bandstand, restroom, parking facilities, and road improvements to Ynez Road.
The Summer/Fall issue of the City of Temecula's Guide to Leisure Activities brochure has been
mailed to Temecula residents. This issue of the recreation brochure will offer many new and
exciting classes and programs including the Summer Aquatics program, the Star Spangled 4m
of July parade and fireworks show, and the Santa's Electric Light Parade.
The City's annual Summer Swim Lesson program is currently underway. Swim lessons will be
offered throughout the summer at both the Temecula Community Recreation Center and the
Temecula Elementary School Pool. All levels of swim instruction are offered.
Staff is gearing up for the Temecula Community Services Department's annual Summer Day
Camp program which begins this week. This year's program will accommodate up to 75
children, ranging in age from 6 to 12 years of age. Held at the Community Recreation Center,
the program provides arts, crafts, games, swimming and excursions to all participants in the
program. This is a very successful program, and all sessions are full each summer. Due to the
Temecula Valley Unified School District going back to a traditional schedule, with all students
out of school during the summer months, the City's Summer Day Camp program is sold out.
The maintenance division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation
facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings or facilities. The maintenance division
is currently overseeing the 90 maintenance period of the Temecula Duck Pond.
The City had hoped that the State Legislature would support a $1 billion bond to build libraries
throughout California. At this point, it is not certain whether or not his bond will move
forward. In the meantime, staff is pursuing other sources including Riverside County, the State
Senate, and Federal sources through Senator Barbara Boxer. In addition to City staff pursuing
funding, the County Librarian is also looking for funding for the Temecula Library project, as the
Temecula Library is the highest circulating library in the Riverside County Library System and
is the County's number one library to be constructed once funding is identified.
R:~.~[GLERO~g~I)EPTRP~9906.do~
/mr 16, 1999
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JUNE 8, 1999
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
7:39 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberrs,
Stone, and Lindemans.
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None.
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1999;
1.2 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1999.
2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months ended March 31, 1999
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended
March 31, 1999.
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and
2. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING
3 Disposition and Development A.qreement with Dual Development
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a City Council resolution entitled:
Minutes.rda\060899 1
3.2
RESOLUTION NO. 99-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND DUAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., DATED AS OF
JUNE 8, 1999, FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1-1988
Adopt a Redevelopment Agency resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND DUAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., DATED AS OF
JUNE 8, 1999, FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1-1988
3.3 Authorize the expenditure of up to $2,500 for closing costs.
3.4 Authorize a reimbursement of $10, 179 for improvements costs.
Agency Member Stone noted that he would be abstaining with regard to this itme.
Housing Redevelopment Manager Meyer presented the staff report (as per agenda material).
Mayor Ford opended the public hearing; there being no public input, the public hearing was
closed.
MOTION: Councilman/Chairman Lindemans moved to approve the staff recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Councilman/Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem/Agency Member Stone who abstained.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
As per a recent quarterly sales tax report, Executive Director Nelson noted that although in light of
the streetscape project in Old Town, sales tax revenues for Old Town were up 10.8% for the third
and fourth quarters in 1998 in comparison to 1997.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
Minutes.rda\060899 2
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:45 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, June 22, 1999, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes,rda\060899 3
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Agency Directors
Shawn D. Nelson, Acting Executive Director
June 22, 1999
Review and Approval of the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance/~
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director7~/
OF THE
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
DISCUSSION: The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) consists of three funds, the
Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Capital Projects Fund, and the Debt Service Fund.
REVENUES
Overall operating revenues of the RDA are anticipated to decrease in FY 1999-00 by
approximately $179, 100 from the current year. A slight increase of $107,400 (2%) in property
tax increment revenue is projected. A $163,000 decrease in investment interest is anticipated,
due to the continued expenditure of RDA reserves and tax allocation bond proceeds on capital
improvement projects. An $86,900 decrease in rental income is anticipated, due to the sale
of the Jefferson Avenue ("Reeves") and Sixth Street ("Temecula Shuttle") properties.
EXPENDITURES
Significant items in the proposed RDA budget are as follows:
Low/Moderate Income Housing
· A net decrease of $226,750 in operating expenditures is reflected, due to reductions
proposed for consulting services, the employee relocation program, and the first time
homebuyer program.
RedeveloDment
· A net increase in operating expenditures of $96,854 is proposed.
· Decreases are reflected in consulting services and Old Town plan implementation.
· $25,000 is included to develop a promotional model of Old Town.
· $206,000 is proposed for Old Town development incentives.
Debt Service
· An increase in interest costs is reflected, due to the recognition of $158,020 in
interest on the deferred passthrough to Riverside County (this amount will be
added to the outstanding deferral amount).
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed RDA operating budget reflects a spending plan that is
balanced within projected revenues (other than those items specifically identified to be funded
from existing reserves, such as the facade improvement program and Old Town development
incentives).
Attachments:
Resolution No. RDA 99-
Proposed FY 1999-00 Operating Budget
2
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISFIING CONTROLS
ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
has reviewed the proposed final FY 1999-00 annual operating budget and has held such public
meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. That the FY 1999-00 RDA operating budget is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of finds shah be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the Executive Director.
C. The Agency Members must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the
Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The Agency Members must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions
above the level indicated in the final budget. The Executive Director may authorize the hiring of
temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The Executive Director may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Agency Member action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the Executive
Director may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of
Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require Agency Member action, except that the Executive
Director may approve change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Agency Members
in amounts up to project contingency established by the Agency Members.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the Agency books at June 30, 1999 are
hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 1999-00.
Section 4. The Agency Secretary shah certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula this 22'~ day of June, 1999.
Karel F. Lindemans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Agency Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 22~d day of June, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Agency Secretary/City Clerk
PROPOSED ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
FY 1999-00
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
City of Temecula
REVENUE8 BY FUND - REDEFELOPMENT AGENCY
Actual
FY 1996-97
Actual
FY 1997-98
Estimated
FY 1998-99
Projected
FY 1999-00
Low/Moderate
Income Set Aside $ 1,575,790 $
Rodevelopment* 738,934
Debt Service 6.360.602
Total- $ 8,675.326 $
1,579,372
623,800
5,859,588
8.062,760
*Does not include operating transfers frown Debt Service Fund.
1,336,100
331,000
5,483,200
7,150,300
1,269,000
113,100
5,778,570
7, 160,670
$9,000.000
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000.000
$4,000.000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
FOUR YEAR COMPAKISON
S8,675,326 I
JS8,062,760 I
I
Actual FY 1996-97
Actual FY 1997-98
m ~. ~:':..!i .::"::i:,-::!;:~':'
I
I
I
Estimated FY 1998-99 Projected FY 1999-00
I Low/Mod Set Aside [] Redevelopment m Debt Service
City of Tenwcula
EXPENDITURE ..~UJlJ!ARY BY CATEGORY- REDEI/ELOP,~!ENr AGENCY FUNDS
Operation~
Fund Penonnei & Maintenance
Low/Moderate
Income Set Aside $ 202,150 $ 643,840
Rodevelopment 84,430 935,150 $
I)~bt Service 5, 1 ! 1,820
Total $ 286,580 $ 6.690,810 $
Capital
Outlay
Ol~mtin~
Tram fen
$
$ 1,105,400
$ 1,105,400 $
Total
845,990
1,019,580
6,217,220
8,082.790
City of Temecula
CHAN(;E,.V IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00
Revenues
Odlef Sources:
Operating Transfers In
Long-term D~bt
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures (Appropriations) (I)
Ot~er Uses:
Operating Transfers Out (2)
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over
(Under) Ex3~enditures and Other Uses
Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999 (3)
Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000
Special
Revenue Fund
General Gas Low/~loderale
Fund Ta; Housing
$ 25,640,700 $ 881,100 $ 1,269,000
881,100
Redevelopment Atent7
Redevelop.
$ 113,100 $
1,105,400
26,521,800 881,100 1,269,000 1,218,500
(24,776,410) (845,990) (1,019,580)
(95/,000) (881,1oo)
DeM
Service
4,8O6,OOO
972,57O
5,77&570
(5,111,820)
(1,105,400)
787,390 423,010 198,920 (438,650)
12.178.609 ! 76.990 551,764 1,887,570
12,965,999 600,000 750,684 1,448,920
150,000
216500
98,484
285,900
60o,000
Designations:
Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies 7.432,923
Continuing Appropriation 144,444
Debt Service
Reserves:
Encumbrances 300,000
Land Held for Resale 530,401
Long-term Receivables 3,013,892
Debt Service
Unreserved Fund BalanceEquity,
June 30. 2000 $. 1.544.339 $ $ $
(I) Excludes amounts budgeted for capital outlay through the capital improvement program.
(2) General Fund Operating Tray. slots Out includes a $725,000 transfer to the Cit3~s capital Projects Fund. The Capital Projects Fund is
presented in ~c separate capital improvement program budget documcnL
(3) Redevelopmerit Agency fund balances at July I, 1999 do not include mounts committed to the City's capital improvement pingrant
1,448,920
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT SUMMAR Y - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HOUSING/
REDEVELOPMENT
MANAGER
John Meyer
I
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
Temecula
O.N.E.
First Time
Homebuyer
Residential
Improvement
Programs
Land Acquisition
Affordable
Housing Project
Development
Capital Projects
Old Town
Specific Plan
Implementation
Old Town
Advisory
Committee
Community
Liaison
4
City of Temecula
DEPARTAIENT SUlllJ!ARY- REDEVELOP~!ENT AGENCY
Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside
Funding Source:
Tax Increment
Expenditure Summary
Actual
FY 1996-97
Personnel $ 65,777
Operations and Maintenance 309, 157
Capital Outlay
Total $ 374,934
Actual
FY 1997-98
209,872
361,816
14,979
$ 586,667
Budgeted
FY 1998-99
$ 187,270
885,470
,072,740
Proposed
FY 19994}0
202, 150
643,840 .
845,990
Redevelonment
Funding Source:
Tax Increment
Actual
Expenditure Summary FY 1996-97
Personnel $ 136,249
Operations and Maintenance 1,136,389
Capital Outlay
Total $ 1,272,638
Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
219,967 $ 90,480
661,349 829,246
7,780 3,000
889,096 $ 922,726
$ 84~30
935,150
$ 1,019,580
Debt Sen'ice
-Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations and Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Funding Source:
Actual Actual Budgeted
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99
5,237,153
Toml $ 5,237,153
5,120,426 $ 4,899270
5,120,426 $ 4,899,270
Tax Increment
Proposed
FY 1999-00
$ 5,111,820
$ 5,111,820
*Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund.
Personnel Allocation
Authorized
1998-99
Changes
Proposed
1999-00
LOW/MOD HOUSING
Housing/Redevelopment Manager
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary
Sub-Total
0.75
0.75
0.50
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
0.75
0.50
CIP/REDEVELOPMENT
Housing/Redevelopment Manager
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary.
Sub-Total
Redevelopment Agency Total
0.25
0.25
0.50
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.50
City of Temecula
DEPARTZ/1F3~ S~RY- REDEVF~OPA~ENT AGENCY
Program: Housing
MISSION:
The Housing Program is responsible for developing, rehabilitafin~ and preserving
affordable housing oppommifies.
1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Funded 20 first time homebuyen
Funded 36 resideafial improve!lleots, consisting of painting, roofing and fencing
OBJECTIVES:
PROVIDE QUALITY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW AND
MODERATE INCOX~E FAMILIES AND TO EXPAND THEIR AVAH~ABILITY.
Ensm-e complinnce with State Redevelopmerit Law.
Monitor existing affordable housing covenants.
Administer the First Time Homebuyer and Employee Relccation Programs.
Administer the Residential Improvement Program.
Acquire land and develop projects to support new affordable housing opportunities.
Encourage private invcstment in the expansion of affordable housing.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of affordable housing units
provided
Number of affordable housing units
rehabffitated
Number of First Time Homebuyers
assisted
Number of Employee Relocation
Homebuyers assisted
PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
FY 1997/98 FY 1997198 FY 1998/99 ' FY 1999100
7 150 76 78
30 20 36 175
20 18 20 15
0 0 0 6
7
City of Temec~la
DEPAR~t,I~,~ S~Y - REDEVELOPA,FENT ,~ GENCT'
Program: Redevelopmerit
MISSION: The Redevelopment Program is responsible for encoura~ng private investment,
! removing blight, and promoting economic revit~liT~lion in the redevelopment project
area.
1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
· Completed constnmtion of the Old Town Streetsrape Improvement Project
GOAL 1:
OBJECTIVES:
IMPLEMENT THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN.
Work with Old Town merchants, property owners, civic groups and the development
community to:
make private and public improvements in Old Town,
develop projects that will revitalize Old Town economy, and
assist in the private rehabilitatkm of buildings in Old Town.
Promote and encourage participation in the Facade Improvement Program.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of F ag;ade Improvement projects
completed
Number of historical slructures assisted
Number of redevelopment projects
negotiated and completed
PROJECTED ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED
FY 1997/98 FIt 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1999100
6 3 6 8
6 0 1 2
0 0 0 2
City of Temecula
D~P,4RTZ~iV'F S~Y- R~DEr/ELOPA4~IV~ ,4 GF_~rCY
Program: Debt Service
MISSION:
The Debt Service Program is the oper~ng budget for the Redcvelopment Agency. Items
budgeted include debt service princi~ and interest, property tax ~ministrativc fees, and
passthrough agreements.
1998-99 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
· All debt service and related costs for the 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds were made in
a timely manner
ENSURE TIMELY PAYMENT OF DEBT SERVICE AND RELATED COSTS.
RDA
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
FINANCE DIRECTO(~ ~
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.~___
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDAREPORT
Executive DirectorlRedevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Housing & Redevelopment Manager~j~
June 22, 1999
Monthly Departmental Report
Attached for your information is the monthly report as of June 22, 1999 for the Redevelopment
Department.
HOUSING
First Time Homebuyers Program
Funding in the amount of $400,000 is available for FY 98-99. 16 Loans have been closed for
$336,760 with 2 loans pending.
Residential Improvement Proc~rams
For FY 98/99, 37 projects have been completed and 15 are in process. The program budget is
$200,000 and $141,649.64 has been funded. The majodty of these projects are roof repairs,
repainting and fence replacement.
Affordable Rental Housina Projects
Agency staff has the responsibility for monitoring all projects obtaining Agency assistance to
rehabilitate existing affordable rental housing as well as new construction. After completion, annual
reporting is required to ensure all tenants continue to meet income criteria outlined in the Project
Regulatory Agreement and that all rents charged are within established affordable limits. Review
of a 30-unit project, Rancho Creek Apartments, has been completed and the project is in compliance
with affordability covenants.
R:\SYERSK\MONTHLLY\REPORT.JUNE.doc
Mission Village Redevelopment Projects
Rehabilitation of 38 distressed affordable housing units is underway, and construction of 38 new
units has begun. All units will be occupied by very low and low-income families. Staff is currently
reviewing compliance of the Mission Village project.
Pujol Acguisitions for Affordable Housing
Staff has initiated negotiations with six properly owners in the Pujol area to purchase their property
for the future development of affordable housing. Two owners have accepted offers at the appraised
value, and two others have returned counter-offers.
Temecula Villas
Due to the expiration of the property owner's contract with HUD to subsidize rants, staff has assisted
19 households with relocation issues. In addition, we are working with the owner to retain affordable
housing units in the future.
OLD TOWN
Old Town Streetscape Improvement Projects
The Streetscape improvement project is complete. The sound system is operational and the
gateway arches and flagpoles have been installed. The Gateway plaques have been ordered and
are scheduled to arrive in a few weeks.
Facade Improvement/Non-Conforming Sign Program
The following facade improvement/sign projects are completed:
· Express Bodicare (new business on Front Street)
- New signs only
· Musicians Workshop (Mercedes)
- New handicap parking and restroom facilities, new front windows and front entry door
The following facade improvements are underway:
· Second Street Automotive (Second and Mercedes) - Complete Facade Renovation
Rancon Building (Front Street)
- Repaint Trim
· Kreigers General Store (Mercedes)
- New exterior facade and handicap restroom facilities
· U.S. Land (Front Street)
- Exterior Paint
R:\syersk\monthly\report. May
2
Swing Inn (Front Street)
Extedor Paint
· Main Street Salon
- Signs
R :\syersk~monthly\report. May
3
ITEM 20
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
June 22, 1999
Modification of the Parking Standards for pad of the Old Town Specific
Plan (Planning Application No. PA99-0160)
RECOMMENDATION:
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD
TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160.
BACKGROUND:
The Old Town Specific Plan was initially approved in 1994. One of the components of the Specific
Plan was the provision of additional parking in the core area of Old Town. This item has been under
active discussion since 1997. In 1998, the City Council appointed councilmembers Lindemans and
Ford to a subcommittee to review possible parking options in Old Town and make a recommendation
on how to address this issue. The subcommittee members met on March 2, 1999 to review the
situation and discuss the vadous options. As a result of their meeting, the subcommittee suggested
that the City eliminate the parking standard for all uses in the core of Old Town Temecula and that
the City should provide the necessary parking in several public lots spread throughout Old Town.
The subcommittee's recommendation has resulted in the current proposal to eliminate the off-street
parking requirement in the Tourist Retail Core and the Community Commercial/Tourist Support
Districts. These two areas represent the heart of Old Town Temecula. The current parking
standards (from the Development Code) would continue to apply to the remaining eight districts of
the Specific Plan.
R:~staffrpt\l 60pa99 CC.doc
1
At the May 19, 1999 Planning Commission, this request was considered by the Commission and they
unanimously recommended that the Council adopt this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan.
In their action, the Commission also suggested that in the future, there would most likely be a need
to provide additional handicapped parking throughout Old Town and to consider possible loading
restrictions. In addition, as Old Town gets closer to build-out conditions, there may be a need for
a plan to ensure that adequate public parking and restroom facilities are available when they are
needed. A copy of the Commission Resolution is included with this Staff Report in Attachment No.
2.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This plan amendment is a minor modification to some of the on-site parking requirements contained
in the previously adopted specific (community) plan. The amendment will not change any of the
potential physical impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific
Plan. As a result, this action is exempt from environmental review according to the provisions of
15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15061 (b)(3) states that CEQA applies only to
activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.
FINDINGS
The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is consistent with the adopted City
General Plan.
The proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term goals and objectives contained
in the Old Town Specific Plan.
The proposed amendment will further the redevelopment and revitalization of the Old Town
area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There will be a future fiscal impact on the City and/or Redevelopment Agency as needed public
parking is constructed with public funds. The magnitude of this impact cannot be determined at this
time.
ATTACHMENT:
Ordinance - Page
PC Resolution - Page
Old Town Specific Plan Land Use Map - Page
R:~staffrpt\160pa99 CC.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
R :~staffrpt\160pa99 CC .doc
3
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD
TOWN TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
follows:
Section III. F. 2. of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby amended to read as
"2. Parking The parking requirements for the Specific Plan shall be the same as those
delineated in Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code, as amended, except that no on-site parking
is required for uses within the Toudst Retail Core (TRC) and Community Commerdal/Tourist Support
(CCTS) Planning Areas."
Section 2.
following findings:
Findin.cls. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment promotes the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public parking spaces
that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of
desirable character that will be compatible with both the existing and proposed development in the
surrounding area and would promote the preservation of the historic character of Old Town.
Section 3. Environmental Determination. This plan amendment represents a minor
modification to some of the on-site parking requirements contained in the previously adopted specific
plan. The amendment will not change any of the potential physical impacts to the environment
associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. As a result, this action is exempt from
environmental review according to the provisions of 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in
said City.
R:%staffrpt\160pa99 CC.doc
4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22"~
day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 22"d day of June, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the
__ day of ,1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R :~staffrpt\160pa99 CC .doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
R:%staffrpt\l 60pa99 CC.doc
6
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO MODIFY THE PARKING
STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160)
WHEREAS, a Subcommittee of the City Council has suggested that the parking standards
in the Old Town area be amended to further encourage the revitalization of this historic area;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0160 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0160 on
May 19, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PA99-0160;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findin.as. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning
Application No. PA99-0160, makes the following findings:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term goals and
objectives contained in the Old Town Specific Plan.
2. The proposed amendment will further the redevelopment and revitalization
of the Old Town area.
Section 3. Recommendation of Approval. The Planning Commission hereby recommends
that the City Council adopt the Ordinance, substantially in the form that is contained in Exhibit A,
attached to this Resolution.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. This amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan
represents a minor modification to some of the on-site parking requirements contained in the
previously adopted specific plan. The amendment will not change any of the potential physical
impacts to the environment associated with implementing the Old Town Specific Plan. As a result,
this action is exempt from environmental review according to the provisions of 15061 (b)(3) of the
CEQA Guidelines.
R:Lstaffrpt~160pa99 CC.doc
7
Section 5. Additional Comments. The Planning Commission also wishes to share the
following thoughts about Old Town with the City Council.
A. That there may be a need for either on-street handicapped parking or handicapped
parking that is dispersed throughout the core area.
B. That there may a need in the future for the City to adopt loading and delivery
restrictions in the Old Town area, especially along Front Street.
C. As we get closer to build-out conditions, there may be a need for an overall public
parking and restroom plan in the core area to ensure that adequate public parking is available when
Old Town becomes economically successful. This could also include a method for the City to track
the amount of on- and off-street parking throughout this area.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 1999.
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19a' day of May, 1999
by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R :~staffrpt\160pa99 CC .doc
8
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP
R:~staffrpt\l 60pa99 CC.doc
9
III
' in
/
/
/~
/
/
ITEM 21
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
C ATT~)RPNPERYOV~.,)~ )
ITY
DIRECTOR Of FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Howard R. Windsor, Fire Marshal/Battalion Chief
June 22, 1999
An Urgency Ordinance Amending the California Fire Code.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
I Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment.
2. Approve a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING
FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A
DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE
CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998
EDITION, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO
PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled:
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING
BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1,
CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM
FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION.
p:\forms~city clerk forms~staff report - shell 1
Conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 99- entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.16 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE VOLUME 1, CCR
TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM FIRE
CODE STANDARDS VOLUME 2, 1997 EDITION.
DISCUSSION: The adoption of the most current edition of the California Fire Code is one of the
most important public health, safety and welfare issues that will be presented to you for your
consideration and adoption. The fire codes enforced by local jurisdictions in the State of
California are reviewed, amended and adopted by the Building Standards Commission on a
three (3) year code adoption cycle. Upon the adoption and publication of the State Codes, each
local jurisdiction has a period of 180 days to further modify these Codes with more stringent
local amendments based upon local geographical, topographical and or climatic conditions.
The ordinance before you tonight is being presented as an urgency ordinance. The state
mandated adoption date is July 1, 1999. Therefore, due to the length of time involved with
staff's extensive study of the new code editions, and to enable staff to adopt the California Fire
Code with local amendments before this date, the urgency action is necessary. The ordinance
before you tonight proposes very few local amendments. Many of the provisions in this
ordinance are substantially the same as previous provisions of the current Municipal Code.
Staff is proposing to modify the code provisions that are mostly administrative in nature and are
substantiated on the requirements of fire apparatus for turning radius, weight and operational
considerations. Provisions that dictate the requirement of fire extinguishing systems based on
building construction type, size of the building, and required fire flow currently exist and will be
carried forward, These provisions are consistent with regulations as currently required by
Riverside County Fire Department.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT:
p:~forms~city clerk forms~staff report - shell 2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING
FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A
DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY
COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.16
OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING
THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9,
1998 EDITION, ARE REASONABLE AND NECESSARY TO
PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND
WELFARE.
WHEREAS, certain building standards and other related uniform cedes are adopted by the
State of California in the California Building Standards Code which becomes applicable in the
City unless amended by the City pursuant to Health and Safety Cede Section 17958; and,
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 provides for the City Council to
make reasonably necessary changes or modifications based on certain local conditions before
adopting the most current edition of the model codes; and,
WHEREAS, the Fire Chief of the City of Temecula has determined and recommended that
the modifications to the California Fire Code CCR, Title 24 Part 9, 1998 edition are reasonably
required to be adopted by the City of Temecula; and,
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires the City Council to make
express findings of the necessity for modifications to the building standards in the most current
editions of the model codes as adopted by the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby expressly finds that the
amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Fire Code,
CCR Title 24 Part 9, 1998 edition, contained in Ordinance No. 99- regarding
identification of fire protection equipment and premises (Subsections C and D of Sections
15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire apparatus access roads (Subsections E, F, G,
H, I, J and K of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), fire protection systems and
equipment (Subsections L, M, N, O, P, and Q of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal
Code), fire-extinguishing systems (Subsection R, S and T of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula
Municipal Code), fire alarms (Subsection U of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal
Code), fire-flow requirements (Subsection W of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal
Code) and fire hydrant locations (Subsection X of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal
Code) are reasonably necessary due to consideration of specific local climatic, geological or
topographical conditions as follows:
Climatic Conditions:
Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual rainfall
varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot, dry Santa Ana winds are
common to areas within Riverside County. These winds constitute a contributing factor which
causes small fires originating in high density development presently being constructed in the
County of Riverside and the City of Temecula which spread quickly and create the need for an
increased level of fire protection. This added protection, including, but not limited to on-site
protection, will supplement normal Fire Department response available in new development, and
provide immediate fire protection for life and safety of multiple- occupancy occupants during fire
occurrence.
Topographical Conditions:
Traffic and circulation congested in urban areas often place Fire Department response time
to emergencies at risk. This condition makes the need for enhanced on-site protection for
property occupants necessary.
Geological Conditions:
The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activity. Because of the degree
of the City 's urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines, the risk of structural damage
and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major earthquake, emergency
resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to such emergencies would be
complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums will assist in reducing risks
associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of traffic flow.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds that the
administrative amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California
Fire Code, CCR Title 24 Part 9, 1998 edition, contained in Ordinance No. 99-__ regarding
definitions (Subsections A and B of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code) and cost
recovery (Subsection V of Section 15.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code), are reasonably
necessary to allow for the application of the Fire Code by procedures suited to the size and nature
of the City's staff and administrative agencies by means suited to the City's experience with local
climatic, geological, and topographical conditions and to provide sufficient staff support for the
time-consuming inspections and analysis required by the City's fire and geological hazards.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22rid day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22rid day of June, 1999, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE
CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION
AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME
2, 1997 EDITION.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 15.16 of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE I CODES ADOPTED
15.16.010. Code Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the Califomia
Fire Code, 1998 Edition (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), is adopted by
reference as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, including:
A,
California Fire Code (CFC) Volume 1, CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition
with appendices I-A, I-C, II-A, II-B, II-E, II-F, II-G, II-I, II-J, III-A, III-
B, IV-B and V-A.
Uniform Fire Code Standards Volume 2, 1997 edition as amended by the
California Fire Code (CFC), CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition.
ARTICLE II AMENDMENTS
15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made
to the California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Corporate counsel shall mean the City Attomey of the City of Temecula.
B,
Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Municipality For the purposes of this code, jurisdiction shah be known as
Ords\95-15 i
the City of Temecula a municipality.
Section 901.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants
Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in an
approved manner to prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions.
Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers
(blue dots).
See also Section 1001.7.
Section 901.4.4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Premises Identification
Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing
buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the
street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting
color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with
suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall
have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the
front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential
units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the
Fire Prevention Bureau.
EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail
Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a
minimum of eight (8) inches in size.
E,
Section 902.2.2.1 hereby is amended to read as follows:
Dimensions
Orals\95-15 2
Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than
thirteen (13) feet and six (6) inches.
EXCEPTION: 1. Vertical clearances may be reduced, provided
such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and
approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the
established vertical clearance when approved.
2. Fire apparatus roads serving single family residences in
accordance with Section 902.2.1 may have and an unobstructed
width of not less than twenty (20) feet.
Vertical clearances or widths shall be increased when, in the opinion of the
chief, vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire
apparatus access.
F. Section 902.2.2.2 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Surface
Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the
imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide
all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW
with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet.
In accordance with Section 8704, prior to building construction all locations
where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads.
When temporary fire apparatus access roads are provided for use until
permanent fire access roads are installed; the fire apparatus roads shall be
an all weather surface for an 80,000 lbs GVW.
G. Section 902.2.2.3 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Turning Radius
Fire apparatus access roads for commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shah have a tuming radius of a minimum forty-five (45)
feet-outside radius.
EXCEPTION: For single family residential, fire apparatus access
Orals\95-15 3
roads the turning radius shall be a minimum of a thirty-eight (38)
feet outside radius.
Section 902.2.2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Dead ends.
Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720mm) in
length shall be provided with approved provisions for the mining around
of fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead end road or cul-de-sac
shall not exceed 1320 feet.
Section 902.2.2.5 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Bridges
When a bridge is required to be used as a part of a fire apparatus access
road, it shall be constructed and maintained with nationally recognized
standards. See Article 90, Standard a. 1.1 The bridge shall be designed for
a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Bridges
shall be capable to carry an imposed load of not less than 80,000 lbs.
GVW.
Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when
required by the chief.
Section 902.2.2.6 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Grade
The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15)
percent.
Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows:
The required width of fire department access roadways shall not be
obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum
Onls\95-15 4
required widths and clearances established under Section 902.2.2.1 shall be
maintained at all times.
Entrances to roads, trails or other accessways which have been closed with
gates and barriers in accordance with Section 902.2.4.2 shall not be
obstructed by parked vehicles.
"No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropriate
notice prohibiting obstructions shall be required and maintained. Any
obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited, as an infraction,
or removed at the owners' expense, forthwith, by any public agency.
L,
Section 1001.3 is amended to read as follows:
Plans
Complete plans and specifications for fire alarm systems; fire-extinguishing
systems, including automatic sprinklers and wet or dry standpipes; halon
systems and other special types of fire-extinguishing systems; basement
pipe inlets; and other fire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto
shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to
system installation. Plan and specifications for fire alarm systems shall
include, but not limited to, a floor plan; location of all alarm-initiating and
alarm-signaling devices; alarm control and trouble-signaling equipment;
annunciation; power connection; battery calculations; conductor type and
sizes; voltage drop calculations; and manufacturers, model numbers and
listing information for all equipment, devices and materials, [for SFM] and
state fire marshal listing number of all equipment, devices and materials
requiring listing.
Hans and specifications for automatic fire sprinklers or suppression systems
in addition to requirements of adopted standards plans shall include, but not
limited to: a site plan; a building floor plan; piping plan (on a separate
sheet); reflective ceiling plan (on a separate sheet); building cross sections;
calculations; hanger details; earthquake sway brace details and calculations;
manufacturer specifications, model numbers and listing information for all
equipment, devices and materials. Hydraulic calculations shall be provided
for each system riser serving a building and for each floor when system
risers are serving multiple floors. Submittals of manufacturers technical
data sheets for all materials to be installed shall be provide with the plan.
Ords\95-15 5
System design shall be limited to 90 percent of the available water supply
in calculated systems.
Three (3) sets of as-built drawings shall be submitted to the fire department
for approval within five (5) working days of the final acceptance testing.
Section 1001.5.4 is amended to read as follows:
Systems in high-rise buildings.
The owner of a high-rise building shall be responsible for assuring that the
fire and life-safety systems required by the Building Code are maintained
in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the
chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved
persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained
and shall be made available to the inspection authority. (See CBC Section
403.)
Section 1001.5.5 is amended to read as follows:
Smoke-control systems.
Mechanical smoke-control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings,
buildings containing atria, covered mall buildings and mechanical
ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for smoke-
removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies,
shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise
required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by
approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be
maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority.
Section 1001.7.1 is amended to read as follows:
General
Posts, fences, vehicles, growth, trash, storage and other materials or things
shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants, fire department inlet
connections or fire-protection systems control valves in a manner that
Orals\95-15 6
would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately
discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from
gaining access to fire-protection equipment or hydrant and shall comply
with Section 1001.7.2.
Automatic fire sprinkler system risers shall not be obstructed in any
manner, if a system riser is to be concealed by means of a wall, soffit,
column, or other building construction, it shall be provided with eighteen
(18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser, access
shall be provided by means of a door with the minimum dimensions two (2)
feet six (6) inches wide by six (6) feet eight (8) inches tall.
P. Section 1001.7.2 is amended to read as follows:
Clear space around hydrants.
A 3-foot (914.4mm) clear space shall be maintained around the
circumference of fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections, post
indicator valves, OS&Y valves and other fire department appurtenances.
Q. section 1001.9 is amended to read as follows:
Special Hazards.
For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature or where special hazards
exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for
fire apparatus, or emergency operations is unduly difficult, the chief is
authorized to require additional safeguards consisting of additional fire
appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems
suitable for the protection of the hazard involved or to assist in emergency
operations. Such devices or appliances can consist of automatic fire alarm
systems, approved fire department communication systems, automatic
sprinkler or water spray systems, standpipe and hose, fixed or portable fire
extinguishers, suitable fire blankets, breathing apparatus, manual or
automatic covers, carbon dioxide, foam, halogenated or dry chemical or
other special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems are provided,
they shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable Uniform
Fire Code Standards and/or fire department requirements. See Article 90
and Section 101.3.
Ords\95-15 7
Section 1003.1.1 is amended to read as follows:
General.
Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with the
Building Code and Section 1003.
Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall
be national standard hose thread or as approved.
The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved and be
located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant.
In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall
be in accordance with Article 81.
S,
Section 1003.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
General
An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies
and locations as set forth in Section 1003.2.
For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see Section
1001.9 and Articles 79, 80 and 81.
1. All Occupancies
Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two
dwelling units or less, which exceeds the Fire area square footage as listed
in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiting a fire flow of
1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system installed throughout therein.
2. Existing Occupancies
Ords\95-15 8
Unless State Code or Statutes, Califomia Building Code, Title 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the
addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the Fire area
square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1
requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shah have an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein.
3. Change of Use or Occupancy
Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shah
install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California
Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 2 or the Califomia Fire Code, Title 24
CCR part 9.
Section 1003.3.1 is amended to read as follows:
Where Required
All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and
water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored
regardless of the number of sprinkler heads.
Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved
central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined
by UFC. Standard 10-2 or, when approved by the chief, shall sound an
audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be
provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER
FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1"
A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each
automatic fire sprinkler system riser location.
EXCEPTION: Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes
provided by the municipality or public utility need not be
monitored.
2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved
residential sprinkler system need not be monitored.
Ords\95-15 9
Section 1007.3.3.4 is amended to read as follows:
Connections to other systems.
A fire alarm system shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire
warning unless approved [for SFM] by the authority having jurisdiction.
Burgarly, security systems, robbery and similar uses shall not be permitted
to be a part of, or be connected to fire alarm systems.
All additional fire suppression and fire detection systems shall be
interconnected to the fire alarm system.
Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Cost Recovery
Section 24.1.
Any person who negligenfiy, or in violation of the law, sets a fire, allows
a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or attended by him to escape his
control or bum any structure, improvement, forest, range or grassland, is
liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a
charge against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such
person which is collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county,
public, or private agency or the County Fire Department incurring such
expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a
contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.1.1.
Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or
ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be
released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous
waste onto the ground or into the environment is liable for the expense of
mitigating and/or removing the hazard created by said actions or omissions,
and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said
charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be
Ords\95-15 10
collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public or private
agency or by the County Fire Department and/or the County Health
Department incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same
manner as in the case of an obligation under arising contract, expressed or
implied.
Section 24.2.
The expense of securing any emergency, which is a result of a violation of
this ordinance, is a charge against the person whose violation of this
ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and expenses
incurred by the Fire Department for securing such emergency shall
constitute a debt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a
contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.2.1.
The expense of securing any hazardous or extremely hazardous materials
or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any
statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons
whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by
the Fire Department and/or Health Department for securing such incident
shall constitute a debt of such person or persons and shall be collectAble by
the County Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case
of an obligation arising under contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.3.
Structure, improvement shall mean, for the purposes of this Section only,
any building, garage, tent, out-building, barn, corral, fence, or bridge
whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire.
Section 24.4
Requests for copies of public and legal documents, photographs, etc.,
relating to department activities is available as authorized by law through
the Fire Department's Custodian of Records. All document requests shall
Orda\95-15 11
be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside
County Fire Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Riverside County
Ordinance 671.
Appendix Chapter III-A, Section 5 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Fire-flow requirements for residential tracts. commercial, retail, industrial.
heavy industrial and multi-family residential developments.
5.3
One and Two family residential tracts with structures less than 3,600
square feet shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow
of not less than 1,500 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 2 hours
duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in
accordance with Appendix III-B.
5.4
Commercial, retail and Multi-family developments shall have water
mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 4,000 gpm
@ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant
locations and distribution shall be in the accordance with Appendix
III-B.
5.5
Industrial and heavy industrial developments shall have water mains
capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 6,000 gpm @ 20
psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations
and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B.
Appendix Chapter III-B, Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows:
LOCATION
Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections and along required
fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets.
Fire hydrants used or installed for the frontage requirements as stated by
Table A III-B-1 shall be on the building side of fire department access roads
and adjacent public streets.
EXCEPTION: When required hydrants utilized or is installed to
the frontage requirements which serves single family dwellings on
Ords~95-15 12
residential streets, such fire hydrant may be on either side of the
street.
SECTION 2. All inconsistencies between the Fire Code, as adopted by this Ordinance,
and the 1998 edition of the California Fire Code, as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California
Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto
authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 17958.5 and 17958.7.
SECTION 3. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as
previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as
continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid,
such validity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part
thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would
have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 5. State law requires that localities adopt the California Building Standards
Code and modifications thereto, by July 1, 1999. It is essential that the City have in effect on the
date codes that comport with state law and contain those modifications necessitated by unique
topographic, geologic and climatic conditions. In the absence of immediate effectiveness, the
provisions of the Fire Code unique to the City's special circumstances will not be in place and this
will have a detrimental effect on the public, health safety and welfare. The modifications to the
Codes contain vital provisions regarding administrative procedures, fire-extinguishing systems,
and other similar matters necessitated by the City's proximity to active earthquake fault zones, the
City's exposure to Santa Ana winds, and the City's limited rainfall in the summer and fall months.
For these reasons, the public health, safety and welfare require that this ordinance take effect on
July 1, 1999 as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code Sections 36934 and 36937.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. This ordinance shall become operative on July 1, 1999.
Orals\95-15 13
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of July 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords\95-15 14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 99-__was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting
of the City Council on the 22nd day of June 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly
adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 6th day of July, 1999, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
O ras\95 - 15 15
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAFFER
15.16 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CALIFORNIA FIRE
CODE VOLUME 1, CCR TITLE 24 PART 9, 1998 EDITION
AND THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS VOLUME
2, 1997 EDITION.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 15.16 of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE I CODES ADOPTED
15.16.010. Code Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the California
Fire Code, 1998 Edition (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), is adopted by
reference as the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, including:
A,
California Fire Code (CFC) Volume 1, CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition
with appendices I-A, I-C, II-A, H-B, II-E, II-F, II-G, II-I, II-J, III-A, III-
B, IV-B and V-A.
Uniform Fire Code Standards Volume 2, 1997 edition as amended by the
California Fire Code (CFC), CCR Title 24 part 9, 1998 edition.
ARTICLE II AMENDMENTS
15.16.020. Amendments. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made
to the California Fire Code, 1998 edition, as adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Corporate counsel shall mean the City Attomey of the City of Temecula.
Section 214 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Municipality For the purposes of this code, jurisdiction shall be known as
Ords\95-15 I
the City of Temecula a municipality.
C. Section 901.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Fire Protection Equipment and Fire Hydrants
Fire protection equipment and fire hydrants shall be clearly identified in an
approved manner to prevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions.
Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers
(blue dots).
See also Section 1001.7.
D. Section 901.4.4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Premises Identification
Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing
buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the
street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting
color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with
suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall
have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the
front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential
units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the
Fire Prevention Bureau.
EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail
Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a
minimum of eight (8) inches in size.
E. Section 902.2.2.1 hereby is amended to read as follows:
Dimensions
0rd8\95-15 2
Fire apparatus roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than
thirteen (13) feet and six (6) inches.
EXCEPTION: 1. Vertical clearances may be reduced, provided
such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and
approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the
established vertical clearance when approved.
2. Fire apparatus roads serving single family residences in
accordance with Section 902.2.1 may have and an unobstructed
width of not less than twenty (20) feet.
Vertical clearances or widths shall be increased when, in the opinion of the
chief, vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to provide fire
apparatus access.
Section 902.2.2.2 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Surface
Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the
imposed loads of the apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide
all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW
with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet.
In accordance with Section 8704, prior to building construction all locations
where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads.
When temporary fire apparatus access roads are provided for use until
permanent fire access roads are installed; the fire apparatus roads shall be
an all weather surface for an 80,000 lbs GVW.
Section 902.2.2.3 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Turning Radius
Fire apparatus access roads for commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a turning radius of a minimum forty-five (45)
feet-outside radius.
EXCEPTION: For single family residential, fire apparatus access
Ords\95-15 3
roads the turning radius shall be a minimum of a thirty-eight (38)
feet outside radius.
Section 902.2.2.4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Dead ends.
Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720mm) in
length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around
of fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead end road or eul-de-sac
shall not exceed 1320 feet.
Section 902.2.2.5 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Bridges
When a bridge is required to be used as a part of a fire apparatus access
road, it shall be constructed and maintained with nationally recognized
standards. See Article 90, Standard a. 1.1 The bridge shall be designed for
a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Bridges
shall be capable to carry an imposed load of not less than 80,000 lbs.
GVW.
Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges when
required by the chief.
Section 902.2.2.6 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Grade
The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15)
percent.
Subsection (a) of Section 902.2.4.1. is hereby amended to read as follows:
The required width of fire department access roadways shall not be
obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Minimum
O~s\95-15 4
required widths and clearances established under Section 902.2.2.1 shall be
maintained at all times.
Entrances to roads, trails or other accessways which have been closed with
gates and barriers in accordance with Section 902.2.4.2 shall not be
obstructed by parked vehicles.
"No Parking, Fire Lane" signs or red painted curbs or other appropriate
notice prohibiting obstructions shall be required and maintained. Any
obstruction or impedance to said fire lane may be cited, as an infraction,
or removed at the owners' expense, forthwith, by any public agency.
L. Section 1001.3 is amended to read as follows:
Plans
Complete plans and specifications for fire alarm systems; fire-extinguishing
systems, including automatic sprinklers and wet or dry standpipes; halon
systems and other special types of fire-extinguishing systems; basement
pipe inlets; and other fire-protection systems and appurtenances thereto
shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to
system installation. Plan and specifications for fire alarm systems shall
include, but not limited to, a floor plan; location of all alarm-initiating and
alarm-signaling devices; alarm control and trouble-signaling equipment;
annunciation; power connection; battery calculations; conductor type and
sizes; voltage drop calculations; and manufacturers, model numbers and
listing information for all equipment, devices and materials, [for SFM] and
state fire marshal listing number of all equipment, devices and materials
requiring listing.
Plans and specifications for automatic fire sprinklers or suppression systems
in addition to requirements of adopted standards plans shall include, but not
limited to: a site plan; a building floor plan; piping plan (on a separate
sheet); reflective ceiling plan (on a separate sheet); building cross sections;
calculations; hanger details; earthquake sway brace details and calculations;
manufacturer specifications, model numbers and listing information for all
equipment, devices and materials. Hydraulic calculations shall be provided
for each system riser serving a building and for each floor when system
risers are serving multiple floors. Submittals of manufacturers technical
data sheets for all materials to be installed shall be provide with the plan.
Ords\95-15 5
System design shall be limited to 90 percent of the available water supply
in calculated systems.
Three (3) sets of as-built drawings shall be submitted to the fire department
for approval within five (5) working days of the final acceptance testing.
Section 1001.5.4 is amended to read as follows:
Systems in high-rise buildings.
The owner of a high-rise building shall be responsible for assuring that the
fire and life-safety systems required by the Building Code are maintained
in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise required by the
chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by approved
persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be maintained
and shall be made available to the inspection authority. (See CBC Section
403 .)
Section 1001.5.5 is amended to read as follows:
Smoke-control systems.
Mechanical smoke-control systems, such as those in high-rise buildings,
buildings containing atria, covered mall buildings and mechanical
ventilation systems utilized in smokeproof enclosures and for smoke-
removal systems utilized in high-piled combustible storage occupancies,
shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times. Unless otherwise
required by the chief, quarterly tests of such systems shall be conducted by
approved persons. A written record and current approved plans shall be
maintained and shall be made available to the inspection authority.
Section 1001.7.1 is amended to read as follows:
General
Posts, fences, vehicles, growth, trash, storage and other materials or things
shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants, fire department inlet
connections or fire-protection systems control valves in a manner that
Ords\95-15 6
would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately
discernible. The fire department shall not be deterred or hindered from
gaining access to fire-protection equipment or hydrant and shall comply
with Section 1001.7.2.
Automatic fire sprinkler system risers shall not be obstructed in any
manner, if a system riser is to be concealed by means of a wall, soffit,
column, or other building construction, it shall be provided with eighteen
(18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser, access
shall be provided by means of a door with the minimum dimensions two (2)
feet six (6) inches wide by six (6) feet eight (8) inches tall.
P. Section 1001.7.2 is amended to read as follows:
Clear space around hydrants.
A 3-foot (914.4mm) clear space shall be maintained around the
circumference of fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections, post
indicator valves, OS&Y valves and other fire department appurtenances.
Q. Section 1001.9 is amended to read as follows:
Special Hazards.
For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature or where special hazards
exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for
fire apparatus, or emergency operations is unduly difficult, the chief is
authorized to require additional safeguards consisting of additional fire
appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems
suitable for the protection of the hazard involved or to assist in emergency
operations. Such devices or appliances can consist of automatic fire alarm
systems, approved fire department communication systems, automatic
sprinkler or water spray systems, standpipe and hose, fixed or portable fire
extinguishers, suitable fire blankets, breathing apparatus, manual or
automatic covers, carbon dioxide, foam, halogenated or dry chemical or
other special fire-extinguishing systems. Where such systems are provided,
they shall be designed and installed in accordance with applicable Uniform
Fire Code Standards and/or fire department requirements. See Article 90
and Section 101.3.
Ord8\95-15 7
R. Section 1003.1.1 is amended to read as follows:
General.
Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with the
Building Code and Section 1003.
Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall
be national standard hose thread or as approved.
The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved and be
located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant.
In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall
be in accordance with Article 81.
S. Section 1003.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
General
An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies
and locations as set forth in Section 1003.2.
For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see Section
1001.9 and Articles 79, 80 and 81.
1. All Occupancies
Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two
dwelling units or less, which exceeds the Fire area square footage as listed
in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of
1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system installed throughout therein.
2. Existing Occupancies
Orda\95-15 8
Unless State Code or Statutes, Califomia Building Code, Title 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the
addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the Fire area
square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1
requiring a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein.
3. Change of Use or Occupancy
Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall
install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California
Building Code, Title 24 CCR part 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24
CCR part 9.
Te
Section 1003.3.1 is amended to read as follows:
WhereRequired
All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and
water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored
regardless of the number of sprinkler heads.
Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved
central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined
by UFC. Standard 10-2 or, when approved by the chief, shall sound an
audible signal at a constantly attended location. An approved sign shall be
provide at or near the audible device stating the following: "SPRINKLER
FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS CALL 9-1-1"
A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each
automatic fire sprinkler system riser location.
EXCEPTION: Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes
provided by the municipality or public utility need not be
monitored.
2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved
residential sprinkler system need not be monitored.
Ord8\95-15 9
Section 1007.3.3.4 is amended to read as follows:
Connections to other systems.
A fire alarm system shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire
warning unless approved [for SFM] by the authority having jurisdiction.
Burgarly, security systems, robbery and similar uses shall not be permitted
to be a part of, or be connected to fire alarm systems.
All additional fire suppression and fire detection systems shall be
interconnected to the fire alarm system.
Appendix Chapter II-A, Section 24 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Cost Recovery
Section 24.1.
Any person who negligently, or in violation of the law, sets a fire, allows
a fire to be set, or allows a fire kindled or artended by him to escape his
control or bum any structure, improvement, forest, range or grassland, is
liable for the expense of fighting the fire, and such expense shall be a
charge against that person, and that charge shall constitute a debt of such
person which is collectible by the person, or by the federal, state, county,
public, or private agency or the County Fire Department incurring such
expenses in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a
contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.1.1.
Any person who negligently, or in violation of any statute regulation or
ordinance dumps, or causes to be dumped, or releases or causes to be
released, any hazardous or extremely hazardous material or hazardous
waste onto the ground or into the environment is liable for the expense of
mitigating and/or removing the hazard created by said actions or omissions,
and such expense shall be a charge against such person or persons. Said
charges shall constitute a debt of such person or persons which shall be
Orals\95-15 l 0
collecfible by the person, or by the federal, state, county, public or private
agency or by the County Fire Department and/or the County Health
Department incurring the expense of mitigation and/or removal in the same
manner as in the case of an obligation under arising contract, expressed or
implied.
Section 24.2.
The expense of securing any emergency, which is a result of a violation of
this ordinance, is a charge against the person whose violation of this
ordinance caused the emergency. Damages caused by and expenses
incurred by the Fire Department for securing such emergency shall
constitute a debt of such manner as in the case of an obligation under a
contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.2.1.
The expense of securing any hazardous or extremely hazardous materials
or waste incident which is a result of negligence or a violation of any
statute, regulation or ordinance is a charge against the person or persons
whose actions or omissions caused the incident. The expenses incurred by
the Fire Department and/or Health Department for securing such incident
shall constitute a debt of such person or persons and shall be collectible by
the County Fire Chief or Health Officer in the same manner as in the case
of an obligation arising under contract, expressed or implied.
Section 24.3.
Structure, improvement shall mean, for the purposes of this Section only,
any building, garage, tent, out-building, barn, corral, fence, or bridge
whether or not in actual use at the time of the fire.
Section 24.4
Requests for copies of public and legal documents, photographs, etc.,
relating to department activities is available as authorized by law through
the Fire Department' s Custodian of Records. All document requests shall
Ords\95-15 11
be in writing, accompanied by a check made payable to the Riverside
County Fire Department, in the amount(s) set forth in Riverside County
Ordinance 671.
W. Appendix Chapter III-A, Section 5 is hereby amended by adding thereto:
Fire-flow requirements for residential tracts, commercial, retail, industrial.
heavy industrial and multi-family residential developments.
5.3
One and Two family residential tracts with structures less than 3,600
square feet shall have water mains capable of delivering a fire flow
of not less than 1,500 gpm @ 20 psi residual pressure for a 2 hours
duration. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be in
accordance with Appendix III-B.
5.4
Commercial, retail and Multi-family developments shall have water
mains capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 4,000 gpm
@ 20 psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant
locations and distribution shall be in the accordance with Appendix
III-B.
5.5
Industrial and heavy industrial developments shall have water mains
capable of delivering a fire flow of not less than 6,000 gpm @ 20
psi residual pressure for a 4 hours duration. Fire hydrant locations
and distribution shall be in accordance with Appendix III-B.
X. Appendix Chapter III-B, Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows:
LOCATION
Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections and along required
fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets.
Fire hydrants used or installed for the frontage requirements as stated by
Table A III-B-1 shall be on the building side of fire department access roads
and adjacent public streets.
EXCEPTION: When required hydrants utilized or is installed to
the frontage requirements which serves single family dwellings on
Orals\95-15 12
residential streets, such fire hydrant may be on either side of the
street.
SECTION 2. All inconsistencies between the Fire Code, as adopted by this Ordinance,
and the 1998 edition of the California Fire Code, as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California
Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications, amendments, additions or deletions thereto
authorized by California Health and Safety Code sections 17958.5 and 17958.7.
SECTION 3. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as
previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as
continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid,
such validity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part
thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would
have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 22nd day of June 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Orcts\95-15 13
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 99-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting
of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted
and passed at a regular meeting of the Council on the 13th day of July, 1999, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ords\95-15 14
ITEM 22
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~E~
C ATTORNEY ~ f
ITY
DIRECTOR Of FINANCE
CITY MANAGER .
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official
June 22, 1999
An Urgency Ordinance Amending the Uniform Building Codes
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
Conduct a Public Hearing to receive public comment.
Approve a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH
THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION
HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT
MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND THE 1998 EDITION OF
THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODES, ARE REASONABLE AND
NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND
WELFARE.
Adopt an Urgency Ordinance entitled:
6/16/99
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99---
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE
FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO:
1998 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS; 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE;
AND THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL
CODE; AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF.
4. Conduct a first reading of Ordinance No. 99-__ entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 99--
AN ORDINANCE OF THE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES
WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION
OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF
THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF
THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIAVE CODE; THE 1997 EDITION OF
THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE 1998 EDITION OF
THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE.
DISCUSSION: The adoption of the most current editions of the model building codes is one of
the most important building safety issues that will be presented to you for your consideration and
adoption. The building codes enforced by local jurisdictions in the State of California are
reviewed, amended and adopted by the Building Standards Commission on a three (3) year
code adoption cycle. Upon adoption and publication of these codes, each local jurisdiction has
a period of 180 days to further modify these codes with more stringent local amendments based
upon specific local geological, topographical and or climatic conditions.
The ordinance before you tonight is being presented as an urgency ordinance. The state
mandated adoption date is July 1, 1999. Therefore, due to the time involved with staffs'
extensive study of the new code editions and to enable staff to adopt the state building cedes
with local amendments before this date, the urgency action is necessary. The ordinance
proposes very few local amendments. Staff has been involved in a statewide effort to obtain
uniformity among regional or county jurisdictions in the code provisions they enforce.
Specifically, staff is proposing to modify the code provisions affecting the required plumbing
fixture counts in the Old Town Specific Plan area. Due to the fact that space is of a premium in
this area, past history has shown that a majority of buildings in the Old Town Specific Plan area
are not capable of complying with current code provisions without entering into costly additions
to buildings. Unlike other areas of the city, public restroom facilities have been provided at
2 6/17/99
various locations throughout Old Town with others planned, The code amendment proposed will
raise the occupant loading before additional restrooms and fixtures are required. Other
amendments in this legislation are mostly administrative in nature. Regulations that dictate the
minimum fire resistance of roofing material used in the city and the requirement for licensed
contractors to perform certain work in commercial buildings currently exist and will be carried
forward.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
6/~7/99
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING
FORTH THE LOCAL CONDITIONS UPON WHICH A
DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE CITY
COUNCIL THAT MODIFICATIONS TO CHAFFER 15.04 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING THE
CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 1998 EDITION, THE
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION, THE
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 1998 EDITION, AND THE
CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION, ARE
REASONABLY NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC
HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
WHEREAS, certain building standards and other related uniform codes are adopted by the
State of Califomia in the California Building Standards Code which becomes applicable in the City
unless mended by the City pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958; and,
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5 provides for the City Council to
make reasonably necessary changes or modifications based on certain local conditions before
adopting the most current edition of the model codes; and,
WHEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Temecula has determined and
recommended that the modifications to the California Building Code, California Mechanical Code,
California Plumbing Code, and the California Electrical Code are reasonably required to be
adopted by the City of Temecula; and,
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires the City Council to make
express findings of the necessity for modifications to the building standards in the most current
editions of the model codes as adopted by the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula finds that the following amendments
and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the California Building Code, 1998
edition, the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, the California Plumbing Code, 1998
edition, and the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, contained in Ordinance 99-__ are
reasonably necessary due to consideration of specific local climatic, geological or topographical
conditions as follows:
Resos\95-112 1
SECTION 15.04.020 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, 1998 EDITION.
A. Section 106.2 Work Exempt from Permits.
5. Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and garden walls
not over 4" measured from the top of wall unless supporting a surcharge
or impounding ~ammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids.
amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local
This
conditions:
Geological Conditions:
The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activity. Because of
the degree of the City 's urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines, the risk of
structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major
earthquake, emergency resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to
such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums
will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of
traffic flow.
B. Section 304.1 This amendment is administrative in nature necessitated by the space
restrictions in Old Town to accommodate modifications of accessible restroom
fixtures. This amendment is in line with the B occupancy criteria of 50 or less
occupants as provided in the California Building Code.
C. Section 502 This amendment is administrative in nature in that it further defines
the address height criteria for residential, and individual commercial suistes.
D. Section 904 Fire-Extinguishing Systems.
These amendments are reasonably necessary because of the following local
conditions:
Climatic Conditions:
Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual
rainfall varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot, dry Santa Ana
winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These winds constitute a
contributing factor which causes small fires originating in high density development
presently being constructed in the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula which
spread quickly and create the need for an increased level of fire protection. This added
Resos\95-112 2
protection, including, but not limited to on-site protection, will supplement normal Fire
Department response available in new development, and provide immediate fire protection
for life and safety of multiple-occupancy occupants during fire occurrence.
Topographical Conditions:
Traffic and circulation congested in urban areas often place Fire Department
response time to emergencies at risk. This condition makes the need for enhanced on-site
protection for property occupants necessary.
Geological Conditions:
The City of Temecula is located in an area near high seismic activity. Because of
the degree of the City' s urbanization and close proximity to major fault lines, the risk of
structural damage and loss of life due to ground shaking is considerable. During a major
earthquake, emergency resources would be extremely taxed, and the ability to respond to
such emergencies would be complicated. Local standards in excess of statewide minimums
will assist in reducing risks associated with earthquakes and the consequent disruption of
traffic flow.
C. Section 1503 Roof-Covering Requirements...
This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local
conditions:
Climatic Conditions:
Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Annual
rainfall varies from 3 inches in Blythe to over 33 inches in Pine Cove. Hot, dry Santa Ana
winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These climatic conditions cause
extreme drying of vegetation and common building materials and predispose the area to
large destructive fires. Higher building standards are necessary to protect against the
increased risk of fire.
D. Section 1924. Minimum Slab Thickness...; and Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels...
These amendments are reasonably necessary because of the following local
conditions:
Resos\95-112 3
Topographical Conditions:
The City is comprised of varying soil conditions and a fluctuating water table that
is fed by artesian springs. This water table will elevate substantially following heavy rain.
The addition of a moisture barrier will mitigate excess moisture absorption into concrete
placed on grade.
Geological Conditions:
The City of Temecula is located in Seismic Zone No. 4 and contains two (2) faults
running north and south within its boundaries. The addition of slab dowels as an
additional means of attachment of added structures to existing is intended to help mitigate
the effects of seismic activity on these connections.
E. Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is considered to be administrative in
nature and necessary in order to allow for a 54 inch release mechanism height from grade
specified.
II. SECTION 15.04.030 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION.
A. Section 504 Environmental Air Ducts.
Section 504.1 Makeup and exhaust ducts...
This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the following local conditions:
Climatic Conditions:
Due to the proximity to the ocean and the influx of moist air experienced in the
City, water deposited in the corrugated depressions of the aluminum flex ducting will not
properly evaporate, thus creating a potential for stagnation, mildew, and possible excessive
build up.
III. SECTION 15.04.040 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 1998 EDITION
A. Section 413 and Table 4-1 This amendment is administrative in nature. The deletion
of this section is made in lieu of utilizing Chapter 29 and Appendix Chapter 29 of the
California Building Code as the standard for establishing required amber of plumbing
fixtures.
Section 719.5 This amendment is administrative in nature intended to clarify an
approved material for clean out installations. This is in answer to our history of
inquiries on this subject.
Resos\95-112 4
C. Section 1204.3.2 Final Piping Inspection
This amendment is reasonably necessary because of the foil.wing local
conditions:
Climatic Conditions:
Generally Riverside County and the City of Temecula has an arid climate. Hot,
dry Santa Ana winds are common to areas within Riverside County. These
conditions contribute significantly to the fluctuation of air pressure in gas plumbing
lines. In lines larger than two (2) inches these fluctuations are subtler because of
the volume, hence detecting a small leak becomes more difficult in the code
prescribed time frame of ten minutes.
Do
Section 1211.3 This amendment is administrative in nature intended to address the
installation of propone gas underslab areas. This section does not address
propane installation.
IV. SECTION 15.04.050 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, 1998 EDITION.
A. Article 336 Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cable.
Section 336-3 Uses Permitted...
This amendment is reasonably
conditions:
necessary because of the following local
Topographical Conditions:
The City is located on a north/south transportation corridor and is developing both
a medical manufacturing and micro component business base. These occupancies typically
contain hazardous uses of varying degree. Non-metallic sheathed cable is not prohibited
from use in the city, but only in commercial and industrial type applications where the type
of construction and constant tenant improvement needs cause a concern for the potential
damage that may be caused to this cable' s soft insulation and protection sheathing.
Resos\95-112 5
B. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby further finds that
the administrative amendments and modifications to the Temecula Municipal Code and the
California Building Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, and California
Electrical Code contained in Ordinance No. 99-__ regarding violations and penalties (Building
Code Section 103, Mechanical Code Section 111, Plumbing Code Section 102.3.2, and Electrical
Code Section 90-04), fees (Building Code Section 107 and Table l-A, Mechanical Code Section
115, and Plumbing Code Section 103.4), definitions (Plumbing Code Section 211) and other
provisions (e.g., Building Code Section 106.3.1), are reasonably necessary to allow for the
application of such Codes by procedures suited to the size and nature of the City's staff and
administrative agencies by means suited to the City's experience with local climatic, geological,
and topographical conditions and to provide sufficient staff support for the time-consuming
inspections and analysis required by the City's fire and seismic hazards.
C. Section 90-8. This amendment is administrative in nature intended to bring the
requirement of this section in line with the provisions of the Temecula Development
Code.
D. Section 110-5. This amendment is administrative in nature intended to establish a
minimum size for the use of aluminum conductors primarily convenience receptacle
and circuit breaker installations in residential and light commercial construction. The
receptacles available are not designed for regular maintenance primarily due to the
areas they are typically used in.
D.Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos\95-112 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 99-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos\95-112 7
URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE
FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMF~NDMF~NTS
THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA
BUILr}ING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION
OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE;
THE 1997 Er}ITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR
ABATEMI~NT OF DANGEROUS BUILI}INGS; THE 1997
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE
1998 Er}ITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELFCTRICAL CODE;
AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: Chapter 15.04 Construction Codes of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is mended to read as follows:
15.04.010 Codes Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following
codes are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula:
As
California Building Code, 1998 Edition (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California
Code of Regulations);
B$
California Mechanical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations);
California Plumbing Code, 1998 Edition (Part 5 of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations);
California Electrical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations);
Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International
Conference of Building Officials;
Ord~\95-14 I
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition,
published by the International Conference of Building Officials
Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International
Conference of Building Officials; and
A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of the
City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such
codes are in force.
15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Building Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
Section 106.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection five(5) to read
as follows:
0
Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and
garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the
top of footing to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or
impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids.
Section 106.3.1 is hereby amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to read
as follows:
De
All contracton and their subcontractors must have current and valid
city business licenses.
Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
15.02.010 thwugh 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated her.in by reference. All references in the California Building
Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shah mean the fee schedule as
established by Resolution of the City Council in ac~or~ce with Section
15.02.010 her.in.
Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Ords\95-14 2
F. Section 304.1 is mended by adding the following exception:
Exception 1. In the Old Town Specific Plan area, for the purpose
of determining required sanitation facilities, B occupancies shall be those
with an occupant load of fifty (50) or less.
G. Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following:
Numbers or addresses for commercial and industrial buildings shall be a
minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the
building. Numbers or addresses in the Tourist Retail Core CIRC) of the Old
Town Specific Plan, is permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches. All
suites must have a minimum of (6) inch high letters on both front and rear
doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high
letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background.
H. Section 904.1.1 is amended to read as follows:
General.
Fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in accordance with this Section
and Fire Code Section 1003.
Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall
be national standard hose thread or as approved by the fire department.
The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved by the
fire department and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant.
In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall
be in accordance with the Fire Code.
I. Section 904.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
Where required
An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies
and locations as set forth in this Section.
Otd,\95-14 3
[For SFM] For special provisions on hazardota chemicals and magnesiton,
and calcium carbide, see the Hre Code.
For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see the Fire
Code.
1. All Occupancies
Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two
dwelling units or less, which exceeds the fire area square footage as listed
in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of
1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system installed throughout therein.
2. Existing Occupancies
Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the
addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the fire area
square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-IH-A-1
requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein.
3. Change of Use or Occupancy
Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall
install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California
Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR Part 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24
CCR Part 9.
J. Section 904.3.1 is amended to read as follows:
Where Required
All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and
water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored
regardless of the number of sprinkler heads.
Ords\95-14 4
Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically Wansmitted to an approved
central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined
by national standards or, when approved by the chief of the fire
department, shall sound an audible signal at a constantly attended location.
An appwved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the
following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS
CALL 9-1-1"
A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each
automatic fire sprinkler system riser location.
Exception:
1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided
by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored.
2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved
residential sprinkler system need not be monitored.
Exception:
Section 1503 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code
shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504,
except that no roof coveting shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly.
1. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code
within the Historical District Overlay, generally known as the Old
Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less
than a Class C roofing assembly.
2. The roof coveting of any structure located on a parcel with
a minimum of one-half acre in area may have a roof coveting of not
less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approval by the
Building Official.
3. The roof coveting of all re-roofing shall conform to the
applicable provisions of this Section as amended herfin, except that
the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of
the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the
OralsLOS-14 5
remainder of the roof.
K. Section 1924 is hereby mended to read as follows:
Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported
directly on the ground shall not be less than three and one-half (3 1/2)
inches. All group R occupancies shall have a minimum six (6) rail
moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover.
Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be required under slabs on
grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217.
Section 1924 is hereby further mended by adding thereto a new paragraph
to read as follows:
Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from
existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches
on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter,
eighteen (18) inches in length.
Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 paragraph 1 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade
measured on the side of the barrier that faces away from the
swimming pool.
The following appendices are deleted in their entirety from the 1998
California Building Code; Appendix 3, 3a, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 23,
30, 33, 34.
15.04.030 California Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter.
A. Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
B. Section 115 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
Ord~\95-14 6
15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform
Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee
schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance
with Section 15.02.010 herein.
C. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry room
exhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of
Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed
horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-five
(45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run.
15.04.040 California Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Plumbing Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A®
Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated heroin by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing
Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as
established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section
15.02.010 herein.
Section 2 11 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not
connect directly with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by
discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture,
interceptor or receptacle which is direc~y connected to the drainage system.
Section 413 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building
Code
Orals\95-14 7
Table 4-1 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building
Code.
F. Section 719.5 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made
accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap"
or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular
G. Section 1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a
twenty-four (24) hour graph test witnessed by the jurisdiction.
H. Section 1211.3 is hereby amended by adding the following exceptions:
Exception: 1. The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab
as approved by the Building Official.
Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby
deleted in its entirety.
Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in
its entirety.
Appendix I - Reclaimed water systems for Non-Residential Buildings, is
hereby deleted in its etirety.
15.04.050 California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 904 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
B. Section 90-8 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the
same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground.
(Agricultural area excepted.) Where spare circuit protective devices are
Ords\95-14 8
provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the
bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then raceways of sufficient
capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to
an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally
described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under
floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future
use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors
govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official.
Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors
smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used.
D. Section 3364 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 336-4 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be
used for exposed wiring, except as provided in Section 336-4Co), and shall
only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings
(apartment houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade.
15.04.060 Uniform Administrative Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter.
A. Section 205 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in their entirety and superseded
by Section 15.02.010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein
by reference. All references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees,
fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by
Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010
herein.
Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section
15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by
Ords\95-14 9
reference.
Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section
15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by
reference.
15.04.070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. The following
amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
15.04.080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions
are made to the Uniform Housing Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Housing
Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as
established by Resolution of the City Counc~ in accx~rdance with Section
15.02.010 herein.
SECTION H: All inconsistencies between the Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code,
and Plumbing Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Building
Code, Electrical code, Mechanical code, and Plumbing Code, as set forth in Parts 2, 3, 4, and
5, respectively, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications,
amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Sections
17958.5 and 17958.7.
SECTION llI: To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as
previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as
continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments.
Ord,\95-14 10
SECTION IV: If an section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of
this Ordinance or any part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part
thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would
have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION V: State law requires that localities adopt the California Building Standards Code and
modifications thereto, by July 1, 1999. It is essential that the City have in effect on that date codes
that comport with state law and contain those modifications necessitated by unique topographic,
geologic and climatic conditions. In the absence of immediate effectiveness, the provisions of the
Building, Electrical, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes unique to the City's special circumstances
will not be in place and this will have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety and welfare.
The modifications to the Codes contain vital provisions regarding administrative procedures, fire-
extinguishing systems, roofing materials, foundation thickness, air ducts, nonmetallic-sheathed
cable, and other similar matters necessitated by the City 's proximity to active earthquake fault
zones, the City's exposure to Santa Ana winds, and the City's limited rainfall in summer and fall
months. For these reasons, the public health, safety and welfare require that this ordinance take
effect on July 1, 1999 as an Urgency Ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section 36934 and
36937.
SECTION VI: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
SECTION VII: This ordinance shall become operative on July 1, 1999.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Orals\95-14 11
ORDINANCE NO. 99-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE
FOLLOWING CODES WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS
THERETO: THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CAL~ORNIA
BUHJ~ING CODE; THE 1998 EDITION OF THE
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 1998 EDITION
OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 1997
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE;
THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR
ABATEMF~NT OF DANGEROUS BUILr}INGS; THE 1997
EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; AND THE
1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE;
The City Council of the City of Temecula does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: Chapter 15.00 Construction Codes of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
15.04.010 Codes Adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following
codes are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula:
California Building Code, 1998 Edition (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California
Code of Regulations);
Be
California Mechanical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations);
C. California Plumbing Code, 1998 Edition (Part 5 of Ti~e 24 of the
California Code of Regulations);
California Electrical Code, 1998 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations);
Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International
Conference of Building Officials;
F. Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition,
OtdaX95-14 I
published by the International Conference of Building Officials
Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition, published by the International
Conference of Building Officials; and
A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of the
City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such
codes are in force.
15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Building Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 103 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
B. Section 106.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection five(5) to read
as follows:
Retaining walls which are not over two (2) feet in height, and
garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the
top of footing to top of wall unless supporting a surcharge or
impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III-A liquids.
Section 106.3.1 is hereby amended by adding thereto Subsection (8) to read
as follows:
All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid
city business licenses.
Section 107 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated herein by reference. All references in the California Building
Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as
established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section
15.02.010 herein.
E. Table No. 1-A Building Permit Fees is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Ords\95-14 2
F. Section 304.1 is amended by adding the following exception:
Exception 1. In the Old Town Specific Plan area, for the purpose
of determining required sanitation facilities, B occupancies shall be those
with an occupant load of fifty (50) or less.
G. Section 502 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following:
Numbers or addresses for commercial and industrial buildings shall be a
minimum of twelve (12) inches in height facing the street or front of the
building. Numbers or addresses in the Tourist Retail Core CIRC) of the Old
Town Specific Plan, is permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches. All
suites must have a minimum of (6) inch high letters on both front and rear
doors. Residential usages must have as a minimum four (4) inch high
letters. All letters must be placed upon a contrasting background.
H. Section 904.1.1 is amended to read as follows:
General.
Fire-extinguishing systems shall be installed in accordance with this Section
and Fire Code Section 1003.
Fire hose threads used in conjunction with fire-extinguishing systems shall
be national standard hose thread or as approved by the fire department.
The location of fire department hose connections shall be approved by the
fire department and be located within fifty (50) feet of a fire hydrant.
In buildings used for high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall
be in accordance with the Fire Code.
I. Section 904.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
Where required
An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies
and locations as set forth in this Section.
[For SFM] For special provisions on hazardous chemicals and magnesium,
Orals\95-14 3
and calcium carbide, see the Fire Code.
For provisions on special hazards and hazardous materials, see the Fire
Code.
1. All Occupancies
Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Ti~e 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every structure hereafter constructed, except residential structures of two
dwelling units or less, which exceeds the fife area square footage as listed
in Table No. A-III-A-1 of the Uniform Fire Code requiring a fire flow of
1,500 gallons per minute, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system installed throughout therein.
2. Existing Occupancies
Unless State Code or Statutes, California Building Code, Title 24 CCR part
2, or the California Fire Code, Title 24 CCR part 9, is more restrictive,
every existing structure to which additions are made, where either the
addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds the fire area
square footage listed in the Uniform Fire Code Table No. A-III-A-1
requiting a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute shall have an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein.
3. Change of Use or Occupancy
Every existing structure to which a change of use or occupancy occurs shall
install sprinklers when required by State Code or Statutes, California
Building Code, Ti~e 24 CCR Part 2 or the California Fire Code, Title 24
CCR Part 9.
I. Section 904.3.1 is amended to read as follows:
Where Required
All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and
water-flow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically monitored
regardless of the number of sprinkler heads.
Orda\95-14 4
Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved
central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station as defined
by national standards or, when approved by the chief of the fire
department, shall sound an audible signal at a constan~y attended location.
An approved sign shall be provide at or near the audible device stating the
following: "SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM - WHEN ALARM SOUNDS
CALL 9-1-1"
A minimum of one (1) manual pull station shall be provided at each
automatic fire sprinkler system riser location.
Exception:
1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided
by the municipality or public utility need not be monitored.
2. One and two family dwellings provided with an approved
residential sprinkler system need not be monitored.
I. Section 1503 is hereby mended to read as follows:
Section 1503. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code
shall be as specified in Table No. 15-A and as classified in Section 1504,
except that no roof covering shall be less than a Class B roofing assembly.
Exception:
1. The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code
within the Historical District Overlay, generally known as the Old
Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less
than a Class C roofing assembly.
2. The roof covering of any structure located on a parcel with
a minimum of one-half acre in area may have a roof covering of not
less than a Class C Roofing Assembly when approved by the
Building Official.
3. The roof covering of all re-roofing shall conform to the
applicable provisions of this Section as amended herein, except that
the roof covering for the re-roofing of ten percent (10%) or less of
the area of any roof may consist of material comparable to the
remainder of the roof.
Ords\95-14 5
Section 1924 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1924. The minimum thickness of concrete floor slabs supported
directly on the ground shall not be less than three and one-half (3 1/2)
inches. All group R occupancies shall have a minimum six (6) mil
moisture barrier with minimum two (2) inch sand cover.
Exception: 1. A moisture barrier shall not be required under slabs on
grade of open or enclosed patios as defined in Section 217.
Section 1924 is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new paragraph
to read as follows:
Section 1924.1 Slab Dowels. In all occupancies, slab connection from
existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at twenty-four (24) inches
on center with reinforcing steel on one half inch minimum diameter,
eighteen (18) inches in length.
Appendix Chapter 4. Section 421.1 para_m'aph 1 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade
measured on the side of the barrier that faces away from the
swimming pool.
The following appendices are deleted in their entirety from the 1998
Califomia Building Code; Appendix 3, 3a, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 23,
30, 33, 34.
15.t)4,030 California Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter.
A. Section 111 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
Section 115 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
Ords\95-14 6
incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform
Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee
schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance
with Section 15.02.010 herein.
C. Section 504 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Section 504.1. Makeup and exhaust ducts. Bathroom and laundry room
exhaust ducts may be of gypsum wallboard subject to the limitation of
Section 1002(a). Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed
horizontally in rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty-five
(45) degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run.
15.04.040 California Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Plumbing Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 102.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
Section 103.4 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Plumbing
Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as
established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section
15.02.010 herein.
C. Section 211 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not
connect direc~y with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by
discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture,
interceptor or receptacle which is directly connected to the drainage system.
Section 413 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building
Code
Ords~5-14 7
Eo
Table 4-1 is hereby deleted because of similar standards in the Building
Code.
F. Section 719.5 is hereby mended to read as follows:
Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made
accessible by yard boxes, or extended flush with paving with a "brass cap'
or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular
traffic.
G. Section 1204.3.2 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Testing of gas piping over two (2) inches in diameter shall require a
twenty-four (24) hour graph test wimessed by the jurisdiction.
H. Section 1211.3 is hereby mended by adding the following exceptions:
Exception: 1. The installation of propane gas line for island fixtures is allowed beneath the slab
as approved by the Building Official.
Appendix E - mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks, is hereby
deleted in its entirety.
Appendix H - commercial kitchen grease interceptors, is hereby deleted in
its entirety.
Appendix J - Reclaimed water systems for Non-Residential Buildings is
hereby deleted in its entirety.
15.04.050 California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 1998 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 904 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
B. Section 90-8 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Accessory uses or other building, signs, etc., separately located on the
same lot or premises, shall have connecting conductors run underground.
(Agricultural area excepted. ) Where spare circuit protective devices are
provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the
Otds\95-14 8
bus in any flush or semi-flush mounted panel, then neeways of sufficient
capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to
an approved accessible location. Such accessible location is normally
described as follows: Where sufficient attic space is available or under
floor space is available, a raceway shall terminate conveniently for future
use in each such space. Where this condition does not exist or other factors
govern, then such terminations shall be approved by the Building Official.
Section 110-5 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors
smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used.
D. Section 336-4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 336-4 Uses Permitted. Non-metallic sheathed cable shall not be
used for exposed wiring, except as provided in Section 336-4Co), and shall
only be used in one and two family dwellings or multi-family dwellings
(apartment houses) not exceeding three (3) floors above grade.
15.04.060 Unlform Admlnt~trative Code. The following amendments, additions and
deletions are made to the Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter.
A. Section 205 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
B®
Sections 304.1 and 304.2 are hereby deleted in their entirety and superseded
by Section 15.02.010 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein
by reference. All references in the Uniform Administrative Code to fees,
fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by
Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010
herein.
Section 304.3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section
15.02.020 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by
reference.
Orals\95-14 9
Section 304.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Section
15.02.040 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by
reference.
15.04,070 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Building. The following
amendments, additions and deletions are made to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 203 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
15.04,080 Uniform Housing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions
are made to the Uniform Housing Code, 1997 edition, adopted by this Chapter:
A. Section 204 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Violations and violation penalties are subject to Sections 15.02.060 and
Chapter 1.20 of this Municipal Code.
Section 302 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections
15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly
incorporated herein by reference. All references in the Uniform Housing
Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as
established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section
15.02.010 herein.
SECTION H: All inconsistencies between the Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code,
and Plumbing Code, as adopted by this Ordinance, and the 1998 edition of the California Building
Code, Electrical code, Mechanical code, and Plumbing Code, as set forth in Parts 2, 3, 4, and
5, respectively, of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, are changes, modifications,
amendments, additions or deletions thereto authorized by California Health and Safety Sections
17958.5 and 17958.7.
SECTION IH: To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance are substantially the same as
previous provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code, these provisions shall be construed as
continuations of those provisions and not as new enactments.
Ords\95-14 10
SECTION IV: If an section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of
this Ordinance or any part hereof or exhibit hereto is for any reason held to be invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part
thereof or exhibit thereto. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would
have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION V: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
SECTION VI: This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following the date of
adoption
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 1999.
ATFEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ofda\95-14 11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 99--00 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of June, 1999, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of
,1999, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ords\95-14 12
ITEM 23
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAI~
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
,/J~illiam G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 22, 1999
Proposed Traffic Signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico
Road
PREPARED BY: Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- Traffic
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve installation of a traffic signal at the
intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road.
BACKGROUND: At the March 12, 1998 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission, the Commission reviewed a request for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection
of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road. A petition signed by approximately 300 parents requesting
a traffic signal at this intersection was submitted to the Commission at this meeting.
Staff conducted a comprehensive analysis of the existing conditions at this intersection, and
determined that a traffic signal was warranted at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico
Road. Therefore, based on the warrant analysis and the petition, staff recommended that installation
of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road be placed on the City's
Signal Priority List, and an "All-Way Stop" control be established as an intedm traffic control for this
intersection. After receiving public testimony, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommended
installation of an "All-Way Stop" control at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road as
an interim measure.
Recently, staff conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis, and determined that currently the
intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road satisfies seven (7) of the eleven (11) signal
warrants. It should be noted that satisfying any one (1) of the eleven (11) warrants could be
justification for installation of a traffic signal. Currently this intersection is ranked Number One (1)
on the City's Signal Priority List and we anticipate that with the increased traffic volumes on
Margarita Road the need for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection will increase.
Although the existing "Stop" signs on Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road provide a safe crossing for
Sparkman Elementary School students, the "Stop" signs require all vehicles on Margarita Road
(approximately 17,000 vehicles per day) to stop 24 hours a day, even when no pedestrians or
vehicles cross Margarita Road. Less than ten (10) students cross Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road
during a typical morning. A traffic signal can also provide a safe crossing for pedestrians and
vehicles without stopping all vehicles at all times. The unnecessary stop and go at stop intersections
results in increased delay, air pollution, gas consumption and noise and contributes to a general
disregard to traffic control devices. These adverse effects will increase with regional growth and
development in the area.
1
r:~agdrptL99~O622~oq~cosignaYajp
Our records indicate that there have been no accidents involving pedestrians at any of the
approximately 50 signals within the City limits. These signals include intersections which provide
crossing for Temecula Elementary School, Margarita Middle School and Temecula Valley High
School on Margarita Road; Vail Elementary School on Rancho Vista Road; and Chaparral High
School on Winchester Road.
At the May 25, 1999 City Council meeting Mr. Kenneth Ray requested delaying the installation of this
signal based on his opinion that motorists would speed-up through this signal to beat red lights, and
that if Meadows Parkway was constructed to Highway 79 South that the signal would not be
warranted.
The Developers of the Paseo del Sol project have indicated that Meadows Parkway will be improved
and connected to Highway 79 South by November 1999.
Our Traffic Division has reviewed the existing traffic patterns in this area. When Meadows Parkway
is connected to Highway 79 South it will not influence the warrants for this signal. Further we have
met with Temecula Valley Unified School District, Forest Thomas, Director of Transportation, Dave
Allmen, Superintendent of Schools, and Karen Johnson, Principal of Sparkman Elementary School
and they concur with our recommendation to install this signal at this time.
Another consideration regarding traffic speed on Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road is that the 25
MPH School Zone will remain after the signal is installed.
Staff recommends traffic signals which will provide safe pedestrian crossing in a more efficient
manner than "Stop" signs.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit "A" Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" March 12, 1998
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report
3. Letter - Temecula Valley Unified School District
r:\agdrptL99\0622~ep~oslgnaVajp
TEMECULA VALLEY
Unified School District
SUPERINTENDENT
¢. a B. ,Allmen
June 11, 1999
Mr. William G. Hughes
43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
RECEIVED
JUN I 6 1999
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
S, OAR2 j.: -22 _Z-ATJON
~::! SRqJth
Shajer
£~ E!der
HOODS
7oo~<er
Dear Bill,
On June 10, 1999, Forrest Thomas, Karen Johnson, Principal of Sparkman
Elementary, and myself, met with you and All Moghadam regarding the signalizing
of the intersection at Pio Pico and Margarita.
After review, the Temecula Valley Unified School District is in agreement with the
plan.
I apologize to you, your staff, and the Council on the way a member of the
community represented our District. It will not happen again.
~~B. AIIme~~nn
Superintendent
cc: All Moghadam
31350 Ranc~o Vjsta Road Temecula. CA 92592, 909) 676-2661
EXHIBIT "A" - LOCATION MAP
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ali Moghadam, P.E., Associate Engineer
March 12, 1998
Item 5
Request for Installation of Traffic Signal -
Intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection
of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road be placed on the City's Signal Priority List and consider installation of
an "All-Way Stop" at this location as an interim traffic control device.
BACKGROUND:
At the January 15, 1998 regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission received
a letter and a verbal request to consider installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and
Pio Pico Road and directed staff to place this item on the next meeting agenda.
Margarita Road is designated as a four-lane arterial roadway on the General Plan Circulation Element.
Currently, Margarita Road in this vicinity is a three (3) lane roadway with left-turn pockets at Pio Pico Road.
Margarita Road is improved to the ultimate width including curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side only.
This intersection is controlled by "Stop" signs on Pio Pico Road and the traffic on Margarita Road is not
required to stop. There are school crosswalks on Margarita Road south of Pio Pico Road, and on Pio Pico
Road east of Margarita Road in front of Sparkman Elementary School. A horizontal curve exists on Margarita
Road south of Pio Pico Road; however, the sight distance is adequate. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH
on Margarita Road and 30 MPH on Pio Pico Road west of Margarita Road. Also, "SCHOOL - SPEED
LIMIT 25 MPH - WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT" signs have been installed on Margarita Road and
Pio Pico Road in both directions near the school.
Staff has conducted a comprehensive study of this intersection including vehicular and pedestrian volume
counts, speed data analysis, sight distance measurements, traffic collision data analysis and warrant analysis
for traffic signals, "Stop" signs and flashing yellow school signals (Exhibit "B").
The intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road meets one (1) of the eleven (11) warrants (peak hour
volume) for installation of a traffic signal, therefore, this intersection will be included in the City's Signal
Priority List for future consideration. There has been one (1) reported accident within the last twelve (12)
month period at this intersection. However, the minimum volume portion of the warrants for installation of
an "All-Way Stop" is met. Therefore, an "All-Way Stop" at this intersection could be considered as an
interim traffic control device. In addition, the design for installation of yellow flashing beacons at schools has
been completed and the lights should be in place by July, 1998.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Letter of Request
3. Exhibit "C" - Warrant Analysis and Supporting Data
ITEM 24
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
'~William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 22, 1999
Award of Construction Contract for Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersections
of Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road, Project No. PW98-12 and Margarita Road at
Pauba Road, Project No. PW98-13
PREPARED BY: Brian Guillot, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a construction contract for the installation of traffic signals at the intersections of
Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road, Project No. PW98-12, and Margarita Road at Pauba,
Project No. PW98-13 to DBX, Inc. of Temecula, California, in the amount of $219,467.00
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders, not to exceed the
contingency amount of $21,946.70, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Accelerate appropriation of budgeted funds in FY 1999-2000 to FY 1998-1999 in the
amount of $85,900.00 to construction Account No. 210-165-700-5804.
BACKGROUND: The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita
Road at Pio Pico Road and Margarita Road at Pauba Road was approved by City Council in the
Fiscal Year 1998/99 Capital Improvement Program. Presently, both intersections are controlled
by four-way stop signs. The eastside of the westbound lanes for the intersection of Margarita
Road at Pauba Road will be widened to accommodate a right-tum pocket.
In order to fast track the construction of these traffic signals, the City has elected to purchase
the traffic signal poles and controller assembly in advance of the construction contract, therefore
those items are not included with this contract award. At the present time the traffic signal poles
require a 10-12 week lead-time. It is anticipated that the advance purchase will reduce the total
time required to complete the project
In the event the City Council chooses to delay the Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road traffic
signal, Project No. PW98-12, it would be recommended that the City Council:
1. Award Margarita Road at Pauba Road traffic signal in the amount of $86,792.00
Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders, not to exceed the
contingency amount of $8,679.20, which is equal to the 10% contract amount.
1
r:~agdrpt\99M:)622\pw98-12-13award/ajp
The engineers estimate for this project was $251,500.
Six (6) bids were
results:
received and
were publicly opened on June 10, 1999, with the
Pio Pico & Pauba Pauba Only
following
1, DBX, Inc.
2. Highlight Electric
3. Computer Service Company
4. Maverick Electric, Inc.
5. T & M Electric, Inc.
6. Traffic Loops Crackfilling, Inc.
$219,467.00
$225,650.00
$228,073.00
$238,000.00
$238,230.00
$244,130.00
$132,675.00
$136,850.00
$134,836.00
$138,000.00
$133,230.00
$138,630.00
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found DBX, Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder for
this project. DBX, Inc. has satisfactorily completed other projects for the City in the past,
including the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Via
Las Colinas.
The specifications allow ninety (90) working days for completion of the project. Work is
expected to be completed by December 1999.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project funded through
Development Impact Fees (DIF) - Signal Mitigation and DIF - Street Improvements. Adequate
funds are available for the accelerated appropriation amount.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract
r:\agdrpt\99~)622\pw98-12-13award/ajp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PIIV98-f2 & PW98-13
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD
MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 22nd day of June, 1999 by and between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and DBX, Inc., hereinafter
referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW98-
12 and PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA
ROAD, MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and
all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of
Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the
Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by
the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American
Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as
amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications
for PROJECT NO. PW98-12 and PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD, MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD.
Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building New, Incorporated
3055 Ovedand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW98-
12 & PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA
ROAD, and MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
CONTRACT CA-1 R:\CIRPROJECTS\PW98\PW98-13\contracI
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract
Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if
called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document
shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW98-12 & PW98-13, TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
MARGARITA ROAD AT PAUBA ROAD
MARGARITA ROAD AT PIO PICO ROAD
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents herein
above enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO
HUNDRED NINETEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY SEVEN DOLLARS and
NO CENTS ($219,467.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ninety (90)
working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCEHDULE:
Ao
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW98~PW98.-13~contract
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms
provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of
the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of
the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000 0 $75,000
RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE
180 days 3%
$75,00- $50O,000
180 days
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
Over$500,000
One Year
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
CONTRACT CA-3 R:\CIP\PROJECTS%PW98\PW98-13~contracl
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk.
Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR
shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing
wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section
1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The
CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CIP\PROJECTS~PW98\PW98-13~contract
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covedng disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any wdtten notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
CONTRACT CA-5 R:\CIP\PROJECTS%PW98%PW98-13%contract
William G. Hughes, Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Ddve
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above wdtten.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR:
DBX, Inc.
42066 Avenida Alvarado, Suite C
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 676-0115
By:
Jim Perry, Owner
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW98%PW98-13%contract
ITEM 25
CiTY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
.-~Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
June 22, 1999
Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR
1999-2000 TO FINANCE RECREATIONAL AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS
AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET
LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS
BACKGROUND: Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, the Community Services, Parks and
Recreation and Arterial Street Lighting Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were
replaced by the City of Temecula's Parks/Lighting Services special tax approved by the voters
as Measure C on March 4, 1997. The purpose of the Parks/Lighting Services special tax is to
provide for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and servicing of the City's public park and
recreation facilities, recreational and human services programs, median landscaping, arterial
street lights and traffic signals.
The Parks/Street Lighting Services special tax will is levied in the same manner, at the same
time as the TCSD Rates and Charges, and collected on the annual property tax bills for Fiscal
Year 1999-2000. The maximum annual tax has been established at 974.44 per single-family
residential dwelling unit; 955.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, 9148.88 per acre
of vacant property in a residential zone, 9297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-
residential zone, 9446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property, 9148.88 per acre of
golf course property, and 937.22 per acre for agricultural uses.
For Fiscal Year 1999-2000, the total operating budget for parks, recreation, medians, and
arterial street lighting services is 94,589,710. The total possible revenue received at the
r:\yasinobk\parktax.99 062299
current rate from all taxable parcels within the City for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is $2,592,190.
The difference in operating costs over levy revenue is offset by fund balance transfers,
recreational revenues and user fees, and Rest Program contributions.
Pursuant to City Ordinance 96-21, the City Council is also empowered to establish the amount
of the tax levy each fiscal year, approved by the voters, not to exceed the maximum tax rates
identified above. As a result, it is recommended that the amounts to be levied as a special tax
for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, be less than the maximum amounts established by City Ordinance
No. 96-21, in the following manner:
$ 68.44 per single family residential dwelling unit
$ 51.34 per multi-family residential dwelling unit
$136.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone
$273.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone
$410.64 per acre of non-residential improved property
$136.88 per acre of golf course property
$ 34.22 per acre of agricultural property
In keeping with the City Council's continued practice of trying to reduce fees to our property
owners whenever possible, and even though it is allowable for the City Council to approve this
year's Special Tax at the maximum rate, the above recommended Special Tax is a $5.20 per
equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) savings from the maximum rate of $74.44 per EDU. In addition,
this is the fifth consecutive year that the Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula (REST) program
has contributed to the overall reduction in the rates for parks, recreation, and street lighting
services.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Special Tax levy at the proposed rates will generate
$2,592,190. The remaining funds necessary to complete the Parks/Lighting Services budget
will be derived from fund balance, recreation revenue, user fees, and general fund contributions.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution to Levy Special Tax.
r:\yadnobk\parktex.99 062299
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~IECULA
ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN
SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND
SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES,
M'F. FsIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California
Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, the City Council
adopted, and the voters of the City of Temecula appmved, Ordinance No. 96-21, levying and
assessing a special tax on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year,
commencing with fiscal year 1997-98.
Section 2. The maximum mount of said special tax for each fiscal year as
established by Ordinance No. 96-21 is $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit,
$55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a
residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per
acre of non-residential improved property, $148.88 per acre of goff course property, and
$37.22 per acre for agricultural uses.
Section 3. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21 the City Council is empowered to
establish the mounts of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in mounts not to
exceed the maximum mounts specified in Section 2 of this Resolution, as is required to
provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in the
Ordinance.
Section 4. The City Council hereby determines that the following mounts are
required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in
Ordinance No. 96-21, and hereby establishes the following mounts to be levied as a special
tax for fiscal year 1999-2000, which mounts are less than the maximum mounts established
by Ordinance No. 96-21 and approved by voters:
$ 68.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit
$ 51.34 per multi-family residential dwelling unit
$136.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone
$273.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone
$410. 64 per acre of non-residential improved property
$136.88 per acre of goff course property
$ 34.22 per acre of agricultural property
R:\yasinobk\parktax.reso 062299
Section 5. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner, on the same
dates, and shah be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed
and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax,
together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon
which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and
interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Temecula by
the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. All laws applicable to the levy,
collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to
the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to
the special tax, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831.
Section 6. The revenue raised by the special tax shall be placed in a special
fund to be used only for the purposes of financing recreational and human services programs,
and the operation, maintenance, and servicing of public parks and recreational facilities,
median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula
and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith.
Section 7. The special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state
governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that
is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the
Constitution or any paramount law.
Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10,
1999, the property tax roll with the special tax enumerated for each parcel not exempt
therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized,
instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of such special tax as shown on that roll
and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax challenges or
questions the levy of the special tax against such property owner's property, such property
owner must appeal the levy by f~ing an appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on
December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established by the City.
Section 10. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment
of the special tax for fiscal year 1999-2000 would create a hardship for that property owner
during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by f~ing a hardship appeal
with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1999, pursuant to procedures established
by the City, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program.
Section 11. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any
person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdic-
tion, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications,
and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. The City
R:\yasinobk\parktax.reao 2 062299
Council does hereby declaxe that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions hereof are declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROV~X} AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 27d day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HE1HmY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 99- __ was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Temecula at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day
of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMB~
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MENIB~
COUNCIL MEMBERS
R:\yaslnobk\pm'hx .re, so 3 062299
ITEM 26
APPROVAL
TY ATTORNEY
RECTOR OF FINANC
ITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
June 22, 1999
Approval of Election Resolutions
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER
2, 1999
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CALUNG AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF
A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN
OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW
CITIES
3. Adopt a resolution entiUed:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ORDERING, CALLING AND GMNG NOTICE OF AN
ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION DESIGNATED AS
LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH) ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMEBER 2, 1999, FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF
MEASURES RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH
TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY, AND THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES
WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL
ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY TO
BE HELD ON THAT DATE
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Elections Code, a municipality may request of the County
Registrar of Voters to consolidate with the General Election, to conduct the Municipal Election, to
canvass the retums of the General Municipal Election, and to hold the election in all respects as if
there were only one election. This request must be made in the form of a resolution, which
delegates the powers and duties of the Bection Officer for the City of Temecula to the County
Elections DepartmenL This delegation does not include services routinely conducted by the City
Clerk such as advertising requirements for filing pedods and all campaign filings including
nomination papers and campaign statements.
The second resolution that the Coundl is being asked to adopt is the formal resolution calling
and giving notice of the election. This is a requirement of the State of Califomia Election Code
relating to General Law Cities. It also authorizes the City Clerk to give notice of the election in the
time, form and manner required by the Election Code.
The third resolution that the Council is being asked to adopt is the resolution calling and
giving notice of the election to annex the Redhawk and Vail Ranch communities to the City of
Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District, and to levy a special tax and rates and
charges within the annexed territory. The resolution authorizes the City Clerk to give notice of the
election and requests the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to approve consolidation of the
election with the Countys general election on November 2, 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
$50,000 has been budgeted for the election in the FY 1999/2000 Operating
Resolution No. 99-
Resolution No. 99-
Resolution No. 99-
Requesting the Services of the Registrar
Calling Election
Annexation
RESOLUTION NO. 99-__.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF
THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, t999, FOR THE ELECTION
OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES.
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of
California a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 2, 1999, for the election of
Municipal Officers;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of Califomia
relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Temecula,
California, on Tuesday, November 2, 1999, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing
two (2) Members of the City Council for the full term of four years.
Section 2.
required by law.
That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as
Section 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and
furnish any and all official ballots, notices, pdnted matter and all supplies, equipment and
paraphemalia that may be necessary in order to propedy and lawfully conduct the election.
Section 4. That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'ciock AM on the day
of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock PM of the same
day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code of
the State of California.
Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held
and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.
Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City
Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time,
form and manner as required by law.
Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution.
Resos~9- I
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this the 22rid day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[se q
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No.
99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R~e~lS- 2
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, REQUESTING THE SERVICES OF THE COUNTY
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO CONDUCT THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER
2, 1999
WHEREAS, the City Coundl of the City of Temecula, Califomia, has called a General
Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 1999, for the purpose of the election of two
(2) members of the City Coundl and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the
Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the City the precincts, polling
places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election
department of the County of Riverside canvass the retums of the General Munidpal Election and that
the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That pursuant to Sections 22003 and 23302 of the Elections Code of the
State of Califomia, the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to conduc~
the General Municipal Election in consolidation with the statewide General Election on Tuesday,
November 2, 1999, for the purpose of the election of two (2) Members of the City Coundl of the City
of Temecula.
Section 2. That, except for those services routinely conducted by the City Clerk,
delegation is hereby made to the county elections depadment of the powers and duties of the
elections officer for the City of Temecula to conduct said election in accordance with all applicable
laws and procedures. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election,
and only one form of ballot shall be used for each of the two (2) affected Councilmanic positions.
Section 3. That, in all particulars not redted in this Resolution, said election shall be held
and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in said City.
Section 4. That the City of Temecula recognizes that additional costs will be incun'ed by
the County, by reason of this consolidation, and agrees to reimburse the County for such additional
costs.
Section 5. That the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby authorized,
instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election, in time form and
manner as required.
Section 6. That said Registrar of Voters is heraby authorized to canvass the retums of
said General Municipal Election.
Section 7. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution
with the Board of Supervisors, the county elections depadrnent of the County of Riverside and with
the County Clerk.
Resos~99- 1
Section 8. The City Clerk shall cedify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 22nd day of June, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Re~o~. 2
RESOLUTION NO, 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ORDERING, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF
AN ADVISORY ELECTION AND A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AS PART OF THE REORGANIZATION
DESIGNATED AS LAFCO NO. 98-14-1 (REDHAWK AND VAIL
RANCH) ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1999, FOR
SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF MEASURES RELATING TO
THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY, AND THE
ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY; AND REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CONSOLIDATE SUCH ADVISORY ELECTION AND SPECIAL
ELECTION WITH THE REGULAR ELECTION OF THE COUNTY
TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the requirements of Article XIIIA, Article XIIIC, and
Article XIilD of the California Constitution, and pursuant to Resolution No. 38-98 of the Local
Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside (LAFCO), them is hereby called and
ordered to be held within the territory to be annexed to the City of Temecula and the Temecula
Community Services District as part of the reorganization designated as LAFCO No. 98-14-1
on Tuesday, November 2, 1999, an advisory election and a spedal election for the purpose of
submitting to the qualified voters of such territory an advisory measure regarding the proposed
annexation, a proposition authorizing the City to levy a spedal tax within such territory, and a
proposition authorizing the Temecula Community Services Distdct to adopt rates and charges
within such territory.
Section 2. The advisory measure to be submitted to all of the voters in the area
to be annexed shall be substantially as follows:
ADVISORY VOTE ONLY
ANNEXATION: Shall the parcels in the Vail Ranch annexation area be
annexed to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Yes
Services District, contingent upon 2/3 voter approval of the City's
special tax and Temecula Community Services District's rates and
charges on this ballot? No
Re~os~gg- 1
Section 3. The propositions to be submitted to the voters of the Vail Ranch spedtic
plan area sham be substantially as follows:
PARKS, RECREATION, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING AND ARTERIAL
LIGHTING SPECIAL TAX (TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL
REQUIRED): Shall Ordinance No. of the City of Temecula be
adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied
against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent with
the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreational
facilities, recreational and community services programs, median
landscaping, artedal street lights and traffic signals?
Yes
No
REFUSE COLLECTION, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RESIDENTIAL
LIGHTING RATES AND CHARGES (TWO-THIRDS VOTER
APPROVAL REQUIRED): Shall Resolution No. of the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted
replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and
charges levied against parcels within the Vail Ranch annexation area
with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting,
slope maintenance, and refuse collection services?
Yes
No
Section 4. The propositions to be submitted to the voters of the Redhawk
specific plan area shall be substantially as follows:
PARKS, RECREATION, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING AND ARTERIAL
UGHTING SPECIAL TAX (TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL
REQUIRED): Shall Ordinance No. of the City of Temecula be
adopted replacing the existing County Service Area No. 143 tax levied
against parcels within the annexation area with a tax consistent with
the City's special tax which shall only be used for parks, recreational
facilities, recreational and community services programs, median
landscaping, artedal street lights and traffic signals?
Yes
No
REFUSE COLLECTION, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RESIDENTIAL
LIGHTING RATES AND CHARGES (TWO-THIRDS VOTER
APPROVAL REQUIRED): Shall Resolution No. of the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Community Services District be adopted
replacing existing County Service Area No. 143 assessments and
charges levied against parcels within the Redhawk annexation area
with rates and charges which shall only be used for residential lighting,
slope maintenance, and refuse collection services?
Yes
No
Resos~9- 2
Section 5. The text of the proposed ordinance to be submitted to the voters is
attached hemto as Exhibit A and incorporated hersin by reference. The type of tax, the rate of
tax, and the method of collection are stated therein.
Section 6. The text of the proposed resolution to be submitted to the voters is
attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 7. The polls for the election shall be open at seven o'dock a.m. of the
day of the election and shell remain open continuously from that time until eight o'dock p.m. of
the same day when the polls shall be dosed, except as provided in Elections Code Section
14401.
Section 8. In all particulars not redted in this Resolution, the election shall be
held and conducted as provided by law for holding City elections.
Section 9, Notice of the time and place of holding the election is hereby given
and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional
notice of the election, in the time, form and manner as required by law.
Section 10. Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 9603 and 10403 of the
Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to
consent and agree to the consolidation of the advisory election and spedal election with the
County's regular election to be held on Tuesday, November 2, 1999.
Section 11, The Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby
authorized to canvass the returns of the advisory election and spedal election.
Section 12, Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to issue instructions to the County
Registrar of Voters and all County officers charged with duties pertaining to the statewide
election to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election,
including the preparation of necessary materials.
Section 13, The City shall reimburse the County of Riverside for services
performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a propedy
approved bill.
Section 14. The City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of
the measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the
measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the
measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of
primary arguments.
Section 15. The City Council, the officers and staff of the City and the City's
legal counsel are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as may be
necessary or appropriate in preparing for and conducting the election.
ReIOS~9- 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 22nd day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 99__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of June, 1999, by the following
vote: '
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 27
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Shawn O. Nelson, Acting City Manager
June 22, 1999
Review and Adoption of the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget
Genie Roberts, Director of ~inn~e~~recto
Tim McDermott, Assistant r ~
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution 99- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
Adopt Resolution 99- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE
POSITIONS
OF THE CITY OF
OF AUTHORIZED
Adopt Resolution 99- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY
1999-00
DISCUSSION: Attached is the proposed FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget. The
budget includes revenue projections and expenditure requests for the General Fund, Gas Tax
Fund, and Internal Service Funds.
The City of Temecula remains in healthy financial condition. Based upon the Finance
Department's revised estimates of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year, it
appears that most revenue estimates will be met or exceeded, and that actual expenditures
should be approximately $2.5 million less than the budgeted appropriation amounts. The
proposed FY 1999-00 budget is a balanced budget, with estimated revenues exceeding
estimated expenditures (before operating transfers out) by $1,745,390. The City's reserve for
economic uncertainties will be increased by $881,691 to over $7.4 million (which represents
30% of the proposed budgeted General Fund expenditures for FY 1999-00). This budget will
provide increased service levels for the residents of Temecula, while at the same time
maintaining the City's record of fiscal responsibility.
Budget Highlights
The attached "FY 1999-00 Proposed Operating Budget Summary" provides a detailed
discussion by operating department of the proposed operating budget. Following is a recap of
the significant highlights of the proposed operating budget.
Estimated General Fund revenues for FY 1999-00 total $26,521,800, which represents
a $3,086,500 increase (13.2%) over the current fiscal year estimates. The single
largest increase anticipated is for sales tax revenue, which is projected to total
$12,487,000 in 1999-00, a $2t087,000 increase (20.1%) from the current year
estimate. This increase is primarily due to sales tax that will be generated from the
Promenade Mall, power center, and associated retail development.
Proposed General Fund operating expenditures total $24,776,41 O, which represents an
increase of $2,888,870 (13.2%) from the current fiscal year appropriations.
A 16.1% increase in public safety costs is reflected in the proposed budget. The
increases include the addition of four sworn police officers (two patrol, one traffic, and
one special enforcement/narcotics officer). Also included is funding for a six-person
paramedic team. Both police and fire contract costs been impacted by pay increases
approved by the State and County.
Substantial increases are reflected in public works and capital improvement program
administration costs due to staffing increases approved at mid-year FY 1998-99 and in
response to City Council's emphasis on traffic and circulation improvements.
An increase of $325,980 in the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula ("REST") program
contribution is proposed, bringing the FY 1999-00 contribution to $1,176,000. No
change is proposed in the "Measure C" special tax rate (currently $68.44 per
household).
A $385,000 increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement is projected, primarily
due to the increase in sales tax revenue that will be generated by the Promenade Mall
and related development.
2
A $725,000 operating transfer of General Fund reserves is proposed for the City's
capital improvement project program.
A $233,000 operating transfer is proposed to fund the replacement of computer
workstations.
A total of 10 positions are proposed to be added to the Schedule of Authorized
Positions.
"Gann" Aoorooriations Limit
In accordance with Government Code Section 7910, the City Council is required to adopt by
resolution the "Gann" Appropriations Limit on an annual basis. The Appropriation Limitation
creates a restriction on the amount of revenue which can be appropriated in any fiscal year. The
Limit is increased each year based on the growth of population, inflation, and non-residential
assessed valuation
Using population data provided by the State Department of Finance, and assessed valuation
information provided by the City's property tax consultant HdL, Coren & Cone, the City's
Appropriations Limit for FY 1999-00 has been computed to be $28,878,773. Appropriations
subject to the limit in the proposed FY 1999-00 budget total $19,675,664 which is
$9,203,109 less than the computed limit.
Additional appropriations to the budget funded by non-tax sources such as service charges,
restricted revenues from other agencies, grants, or beginning fund balances would be
unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, any supplemental appropriations funded
through increased tax sources could not exceed the $9,203,109 variance indicated above.
Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater than $9,203,109 from the budget
estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limit,
requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years, or voter approval to increase
the City's Appropriations Limit.
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed FY 1999-00 operating budget is a balanced budget that
provides for an excess of General Fund revenues over operating expenditures of $1,745,390
(before operating transfers). Operating transfers out are proposed to set aside reserves for use
in funding capital projects and computer workstation replacements. The total General Fund
fund balance is projected to be $12,965,999 at June 30, 1999, of which $7,432,923 (30%
of annual General Fund expenditures) is recommended to be designated for economic
uncertainties.
Attachments:
-FY 1999-00 Proposed Operating Budget Summary
-Resolution No. 99-
-Resolution No. 99-
-Resolution No. 99-
-Schedule of Authorized Positions
-Proposed FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget
CITY OF TEMECULA
FY 1999-00 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY
CURRENT CONDITIONS
The City of Temecula remains in healthy financial condition. Based upon the Finance
Department's revised estimate of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year, it
appears that most revenue estimates will be met or exceeded, and that actual expenditures
should be approximately $2.5 million less than the budgeted appropriation amounts.
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
The total projected General Fund revenues for FY 1999-00 reflect a $3,086,500 or 13.2%
increase from the FY 1998-99 revised revenue estimates. The highlights are summarized
below:
$2,087,000 increase in sales tax (to $12,487,000)
$1,023,000 increase in capital improvement program reimbursements (due to increases
in CIP Administration expenditures initiated at mid-year FY 1998-99 and as proposed in
this budget)
$174,700 increase in motor vehicle in lieu revenue
$136,500 increase in franchise fees
2% increase in property taxes is projected
$337,500 decrease in community development related fees (due to a slight reduction
projected in new building valuation)
$175,000 reduction in investment interest due to the anticipated use of General Fund
reserves for various capital improvement projects
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
The proposed budget reflects an increase in General Fund expenditures of $2,888,870 or
13.2% from the FY 1998-99 budget. The primary increases affecting the General Fund include:
1 ) police contract costs due to the net addition of four positions, 2) fire contract costs due to
the addition of a paramedic team, 3) public works personnel costs due to staffing increases
approved at mid-year FY 1998-99, 4) an increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement
due regional mall related retail development, and 5) an increase in the 'REST" contribution.
Personnel costs increases are included to reflect a 3% across the board increase in salaries (per
the City's current labor agreement).
A total of 10 additions to the schedule of authorized personnel is proposed. A summary of
these positions is as follows:
A'~RD~COUNC/L SUIIARY 4 AGENDADOC 1
Deot.
Position
Finance
Planning
Planning
Building & Safety
Building & Safety
Public Works
Public Works
TCSD
TCSD
Accounting Assistant
Associate Planner
GIS Analyst
Deputy Building Official
Building Inspector II
Maintenance Supervisor
Associate Engineer
Lead Maintenance Workers (2)
Landscape Inspector
The reclassification of the City Manager Department Office Specialist to an Administrative
Secretary is proposed. Also proposed is a restructuring of the Community Development
Department to move the Community Development Technicians from Planning to Building &
Safety, and the transfer of the Senior Management Analyst from the City Manager's
Department to the Public Works Department.
Following is a summary of the significant items by department in the FY 1999-00 proposed
budget:
City Council
) $10,000 included for the City's 10t' anniversary celebration
Community Suooort
Community Services Funding included at .75% of the General Fund budget
City Manager
Personnel costs include provision for payments to prior City Manager through 9/99
(including final cash out)
Personnel costs reflect the reallocation of 50% of the Assistant to the City Manager
to this department budget
Economic Develooment
) Sponsorships have been included at the current year funding levels
) Overall decrease proposed of over $77,000
City Clerk
$50,000 is included for election costs
Citv Attorney
$52,500 decrease is proposed
Finance
) Includes the conversion of an existing full-time project Accounting Assistant position
to a regular authorized position
Human Resources
) Personnel cost reduction is reflected due to the 50% reallocation of the Assistant
to the City Manager to the City Manager Department budget
A'tWORD~COUNC~L SUMMARY 4 AGENOADOC 2
Planning
)~ Personnel costs include the addition of two authorized positions (Associate Planner,
GIS Analyst)
), Reflects the transfer of Community Development Techs to Building & Safety
Buildino & Safety
Personnel costs reflect the addition of two authorized positions (Deputy Building
Official, Building Inspector II)
Temporary/Project Help reflect the addition of inspection staff for mall-related issues
Reflects the transfer of two Community Development Techs from the Planning
Department and one Community Development Tech from Engineering
Includes request for one light truck for inspection staff to replace existing propane-
fueled truck
En¢iineering
Personnel costs reflect the transfer of a Community Development Tech to the
Building & Safety Department
Temporary/Project Help reflect a full-time project inspector
Public Works
Personnel costs reflect to addition of two authorized personnel (Maintenance
Supervisor, Associate Engineering)
)' Includes request for a new full sized truck for the proposed Maintenance Supervisor
~ $250,000 has been included for 'Category 1' traffic improvements
CIP Administration
~ A total increase of $549,380 is proposed
~ Personnel costs reflect a full year of funding for the positions added at mid-year
1998-99
Police
~ The following modifications are proposed to contract staffing levels:
Additions
2 Patrol Officers
2 Special Enforcement Team
Officers
I Traffic Officer
Reductions
I Narcotics Task Force Officer
A 12 % rate increase is reflected (due to County labor agreement)
$49,100 is included for special event-related police service costs
Firq
$571,180 increase in Fire Services contract costs due to the addition of a paramedic
team (annual cost of $453,500) and a pay increase for State employees
Restructure of a Fire Captain position from Station 73 to a Deputy Fire Marshall is
proposed (no net cost to the City)
Includes request for one light truck or vehicle for fire prevention staff.
Animal Control
), No change
A:~WORDIC(XeMP.,i, SUMNARY 4 AGENDA DOC 3
Non-Departmental
A $385,000 increase in the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement (due primarily to
new mall-related retail development)
The 'REST" program contribution to TCSD is proposed to be increased from
$850,020 to $1,176,000 (a $325,980 increase)
Ooeratino Transfers Out
A transfer to the Capital Improvement Program in the amount of $725,000 is
proposed (from anticipated available fund balance at June 30, 1999)
A transfer to the Information Systems Internal Service Fund in the amount of
$233,000 is proposed for computer workstation replacements
FUNDBALANCE
Due to anticipated expenditure savings in the current fiscal year, it is estimated that the June
30, 1999 fund balance will be approximately $2.5 million higher than originally expected. The
proposed FY 1999-00 budget provides for an excess of revenues over expenditures in the
amount of $1,745,390. After reflecting all anticipated reserves of fund balance (and increasing
the 30% reserve for economic uncertainties by $881,691 to $7.4 million), the proposed budget
provides for $1,544,339 in undesignated, available fund balance.
4
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Following is a discussion of significant items in the proposed Internal Service Fund budgets:
Insurance
:~ No significant changes
Vehicles
:> New/replacement vehicle purchases are detailed in the summary section for each
requesting department
Information Systems
)> An increase in Temp/Project Help of approximately $64,000 is proposed. The
following positions are proposed:
Information Systems Tech (full-time)
Management Assistant/"Webmaster" (part-time)
Video Production Tech (part-time)
$8,000 is proposed for possible Y2K contingency needs
$232,500 is proposed for the replacement of 93 computer workstations
The charge-back to departments has been increased to build reserves for future
equipment replacement and expansion of equipment needs
Suooort Services
)> $10,000 in capital outlay is proposed for a copier for the Maintenance Facility
Facilities
)> No significant changes
A:WOP, D~COUNCIL SUMNARY 4 AGENDA DO C 5
RgSOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CTFY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISRING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY
1999-00 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption
of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula entitled "City of Temecula FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget" is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
/~ No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager.
C. The City Council must authorize transfers (appropriations) of fimds from the
Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The City Council must authorize any changes to the Schedule of Authorized
Positions. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary
within the limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000.
Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may
authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works
funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve
change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project
contingency established by Council.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at hne 30, 1999 are here~oy
appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1999-00.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
22~a day of June, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SE~L]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Ternecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
thereof held on the 22 day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City
at a regular meeting ~d
Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF TnIP~ CITY OF TEMECUIA
REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
WlnP~REAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.12.030 of the City s Municipal Code,
the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies: and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt
the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. The attached Schedule of ,Authorized Positions is hereby adopted pursuant to
Section 45001 of the California Governrnent Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The Schedule of,Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1, 1999, and
may be thereafter amended.
Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of ,Authorized Positions
and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel policies.
Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution
are hereby rescinded.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22"d day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven I. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99- was duly and regfiady adopted by the City Council of the City of T emecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22'l day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City
Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTrY COUNCIL OF TRF~ CITY OF TEMECUIA
ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 1999-00
WHEREAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative (Proposition 4)
on November 6, 1979, adding Article XIII B to the Constitution of the State of California to establish
and define annual appropriation limits on state and local governmental entities;
WHEREAS, SB 1352 provides for the implementation of Article XIII B by defining various
terms used in this article and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific provisions
of the article, including the establishment by resolution each year by the governing body of each local
jurisdiction of its appropriations limits;
WHF~REAS, the required computations to determine the Appropriations Limit for FY 1999-
00 have been performed by the Finance Department and are on file with the office of the City Clerk,
and available for public review;
WHEREAS, these computations are provided on Exhibit "A' which is herein incorporated
by reference and attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. The Appropriations Limit for the City of Temecula for FY 1999-00 is hereby
adopted.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a
certified resolution to be filed in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22~d day of June, 1999.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 99-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22'a day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the City
Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMPUTATION OF GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FY 1992-93 Appropriations Limit ..............................................................$10,109,911
FY 1993-94 Population Change* ........................................................................8.25%
FY 1993-94 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ................................................2.72%
Cumulative Compound (1.0825 x 1.0272) .........................................................11.19%
FY 1993-94 Appropriations Limit ..............................................................$11,241,655
FY 1994-95 Population Change* .........................................................................8.15%
FY 1994-95 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation * * ............................... 21.7 %
Cumulative Compound (1.0815 x 1.2170) ..........................................................31.61 %
FY 1994-95 Appropriations Limit ...............................................................$14,796,098
FY 1995-96 City Population Change* ................................................................10.49%
FY 1995-96 Per Capita Personal Income Change* .................................................4.72%
Cumulative Compound (1.1049 x 1.0472) ..........................................................15.71%
FY 1995-96 Appropriations Limit ...............................................................$17, 119, 161
FY 1996-97 City Population Change* ..................................................................6.54%
FY 1996-97 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation * * ............................. 17.07%
Cumulative Compound (1.0654 x 1.1707) ..........................................................24.73%
FY 1996-97 Appropriations Limit ...............................................................$21,352, 109
FY 1997-98 City Population Change* ................................. 3.01%
FY 1997-98 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ......................... 4.67%
Cumulative Compound (1.0301 x 1.0467) .............................. 7.82%
F Y 1997-98 Appropriation Limit ................................ $23,021,965
FY 1998-99 City Population Change* ................................. 6.41%
FY 1998-99 Per Capita Personal Income Change* ......................... 4.15%
Cumulative Compound (1.0641 x 1.0415) .............................. 10.83%
FY 1998-99 Appropriation Limit ................................. $25,514,326
FY 1999-00 City Population Change* .................................. 4.88%
FY 1999-00 Increase in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** ................... 7.92%
Cumulative Compound (1.0488 x 1.0792) .............................. 13.19%
FY 1999-00 Appropriation Limit ................................. $28,878,773
*Source: State of California Department of Finance
* *Source: HdL Coren & Cone
City Of Temecula June 17, 1999
Schedule Of Authorized Positions
As Of July 1, 1999
Buildin~ & Safety
Administrative Secretary
Building Inspector I
Building Inspector II
Chief Building Official
Code Enforcement Officer
Community Development Technician
Deputy Building Official
Office Specialist
Plan Checker/Building Insp.
Senior Building Inspector
Building & Safety Subtotals
City Clerk
Administrative Secretary
Administrative Technician
City Clerk/Director Of Support Servic
Deputy Director Of Support Services
Information Systems Administrator
Information Systems Specialist
Office Assistant
Office Specialist
Records Coordinator
City Clerk Subtotals
City Council
City Council
City Council Subtotals
Authorized
Count Minimum
1.00 $2,309
1.00 $2,567
3.00 $2,862
1.00 $5,666
2.00 $2,787
4.00 $2,602
1.00 $4,510
1.00 $1,758
1.00 $3,212
1.00 $3,451
16.00
1.00 $2,309
1.00 $1,687
1.00 $5,642
1.00 $3,879
1.00 $3,834
1.00 $3,416
1.00 $1,607
1.00 $1,758
1.00 $2,281
9.00
5.00
5.00
Exempt/
Maximum Nonexempt
$2,879 NE
$3,200 NE
$3,566 NE
$6,868 E
$3,475 NE
$3,245 NE
$5,493 E
$2,193 NE
$3,916 NE
$4,306 E
$2,879 NE
$2,104 NE
$6,878 E
$4,840 E
$4,784 E
$4,164 E
$2,006 NE
$2,193 NE
$2,843 NE
$300 $300 E
Page I of 4
City Of Temecula June 17, 1999
Schedule Of Authorized Positions
As Of July 1, 1999
.City Manaper
Administrative Secretary
Assistant City Manager
Asst. To The City Manager
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Executive Assistant
Human Resources Assistant
Human Resources Specialist
Management Analyst
Marketing Coordinator
City Manager Subtotals
Community Services
Administrative Secretary
Custodian
Deputy Dir. Of Comm. Svcs.
Development Services Administrator
Development Services Analyst
Director Of Community Services
Facility Maintenance Coordinator
Landscape Inspector
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Maintenance Worker
Museum Services Manager
Office Assistant
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Superintendent
Recreation Supervisor
Senior Landscape Inspector
Community Services Subtotals
Authorized
Count Minimum
Maximum
1.00 $2,309 $2,879
1.00 $6,892 $8,396
1.00 $4,632 $5,646
1.00 $0 $8,497
2.00 $6,562 $7,996
1.00 $2,865 $3,571
1.00 $2,298 $2,801
1.00 $2,529 $3,153
1.00 $3,184 $3,879
1.00 $3,392 $4,132
11.00
1.00 $2,309 $2,879
1.00 $1,664 $2,077
1.00 $4,567 $5,566
1.00 $3,890 $4,853
1.00 $2,896 $3,612
1.00 $6,034 $7,351
1.00 $2,236 $2,787
1.00 $2,550 $3,104
2.00 $2,264 $2,827
1.00 $3,999 $4,987
1.00 $3,411 $4,157
2.00 $2,002 $2,496
1.00 $2,903 $3,623
3.00 $1,607 $2,006
3.00 $2,032 $2,532
1.00 $3,879 $4,840
2.00 $2,825 $3,522
1.00 $2,93 1 $3,571
25.00
Exempt/
Nonexempt
NE
E
E
E
E
E
NE
E
E
E
NE
NE
E
E
NE
E
NE
NE
NE
E
E
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
NE
NE
Page 2 of 4
City Of Temecula June 17, 1999
Schedule Of Authorized Positions
As Of July 1, 1999
Finance
Accountant
Accounting Assistant
Accounting Specialist
Administrative Secretary
Assistant Finance Director
Director Of Finance
Purchasing Specialist
Senior Accountant
Senior Management Analyst
Finance Subtotals
Plannino
Administrative Secretary
Assistant Planner
Associate Planner
Community Development Aide
Development Processing Coordinator
GIS Analyst
Office Assistant
Planning Manager
Senior Planner
Planning Subtotals
Authorized
Count Minimum
Maximum
1.00 $2,903 $3,623
2.00 $1,834 $2,288
2.50 $2,181 $2,720
1.00 $2,309 $2,879
1.00 $4,529 $5,519
1.00 $6,153 $7,497
1.00 $2,200 $2,680
1.00 $3,623 $4,413
1.00 $3,734 $4,658
11.50
1.00 $2,309 $2,879
1.00 $3,025 $3,770
2.00 $3,512 $4,378
1.00 $2,222 $2,708
1.00 $3,179 $3,874
1.00 $2,848 $3,468
1.00 $1,607 $2,006
1.00 $4,562 $5,694
2.00 $4,040 $5,041
11.00
Exempt/
Nonexempt
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
E
NE
E
E
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
NE
E
E
Page 3 of 4
City Of Temecula June 17, 1999
Schedule Of Authorized Positions
As Of July 1, 1999
Authorized
Count Minimum
Public Works
Acting Director Of public Works/City 1.00
Administrative Secretary 1.00
Assistant Engineer 7.00
Associate Engineer 5.00
Deputy Director Public Works 1.00
Lead Maintenance Worker 3.00
Maintenance Superintendent 1.00
Maintenance Supervisor 1.00
Maintenance Worker 3.00
Office Assistant 3.00
Permit Engineer 1.00
Public Works Inspector 1.00
Senior Engineer 4.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00
Senior Public Works Inspector 3.00
Public Works Subtotals 36.00
Redevelonment
Administrative Secretary 1.00
Housing Redevelopment Manager 1.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00
Redevelopment Subtotals 3.00
Building & Safety .................................16.00
City Clerk .............................................9.00
City Council ..........................................5.00
City Manager ........................................11.00
Community Services .............................25.00
Finance .................................................11.50
Planning ................................................11.00
Public Works ........................................36.00
Redevelopment .....................................3.00
Total Of Authorized Positions 127.50
$6,453
$2,309
$3,468
$4,016
$5,375
$2,264
$3,999
$3,411
$2,002
$1,607
$4,016
$2,876
$4,677
$3,734
$3,481
$2,309
$4,529
$3,734
Maximum
$7,861
$2,879
$4,323
$5,011
$6,550
$2,827
$4,987
$4,157
$2,496
$2,006
$5,011
$3,585
$5,698
$4,658
$4,342
$2,879
$5,519
$4,658
Exempt/
Nonexempt
E
NE
NE
E
E
NE
E
E
NE
NE
E
NE
E
E
NE
E
E
Page 4 of 4
Proposed Annual Operating Budget
Fiscal Year 1999-2000
CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA
1989
CITY COUNCIL
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Jeffrey E. Slone, Mayor Pro Tempore
Jeff Comerchero, Councilmember
Karel F. Lindemans, Councilmember
Ronald H. Robens, Councilmember
ACTING CITY MANAGER
Slmxvn D. Nelson
PREPARED BY:
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
July 1, 1999
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
ii
City of Temecula
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Page
Budget Message .....................................................................................................................................................1
Resolution Adopting the FY 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget .............................................................................9
City Seal and Mission Statement ..................................................................................................................L ........11
Value Statement .......................: ...........................................................................................................................12
Government Finance Officers Association Award .................................................................................................13
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Award ................ : .....................................................................14
Directory ........................................................................................................................................................; .....15
City Organizational Chart .....................................................................................................................................16
Budget Process .....................................................................................................................................................17
Understanding the Budget Document ....................................................................................................................19
Description of Funds ......................................................' ......................................................................................20
Summary of Accounting Principles .......................................................................................................................22
Explanation of Major Revenue Sources ................................................................................................................23
Debt Administration .............................................................................................................................................26
Gann Appropriations Limit ...................................................................................................................................27
Community Profile ...................................................................................................................................~ ...........28
Locator Map ........................................................................................................................................................29
Budget Summaries
Budget Summaries Overview ...............................................................................................................................31
Changes in Fund Balance by Fund 1999-00 ................ ..........................................................................................32
General Fund Revenues ........................................................................................................................................36
General Fund Revenues by Source ........................................................................................................................37
Gas Tax Fund Revenues by Source .......................................................................................................................38
Revenues by Fund - Community Services District ................................................................................................39
Revenues by Fund - Redevelopment Agency ........................................................................................................40
Expenditures by Department - General Fund ........................................................................................................42
Expenditure Summary by Category - General Fund ............................................................: .................................43
EXpenditure Summary by Category - Community Scrviccs District Funds ............ ; ..............................................'. 44 ·
Expenditure Summary by Category - Internal Service Funds ............ . ...................................................................45
Expenditure Summary by Category, Redevelopment Agency Funds ..... '. ..............................................................46
Expenditure Summary by Department - Gcneral Fund ........................................................~ ...........~ ....~ ................48
Expenditure Summary by Fund - Conununity Services District ..... ~ ......................................................................52
Expenditure Stunmary by Depamnent - Internal Service Funds ............................................................................54
Expenditure Summary by Depamnent - Redevelopment Agency .......................................................................... 55
Authorized Positions by Department .....................................................................................................................56
Personnel Allocation by Department .....................................................................................................................57
General Fund
General Fund Overview ........................................................................................................................................63
City Council .............
........................................................................................................... 64
City Manager .......................................................................................................................................................69
City Attorney .......................................................................................................................................................80
City Clerk .............
Finance ................................................................................................................................................................
Community Development .....................................................................................................................................88
94
Public Works
...................................................................................................................................................... 107
Police ..................................................................................................................................................................116
Fire .....................................................................................................................................................................121
Animal Control ...................................................................................................................................................125
Non-Departmental ............................................................................................ ....................................................127
ili
City of Temecula
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
Community Services District
Community Services ...........................................................................................................................................129
Internal Service Funds
Insurance ............................................................................................................................................................141
Vehicles ...............................................................................................................................................; ..............142
Information Systems ...........................................................................................................................................143'
Support Services ....................................................................................................................................'. ............144
Facilities .............................................................................................................................................................145
Redevelopment Aaencv
Redevelopment Agency .......................................................................................................................................147
Community Development Block Grant
Community Development Block Grant ................................................................................................................153
Capital ImprOvement Prom'am Summan'
Capital Improvement Program Summary ............................. ................................................................................155
Description of CIP Revenue Sources ...................................................................................................................157
Appendix
Glossary of Terms ...............................................................................................................................................159
Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property From Incorporation .................................................... 162
Federal Grant Expenditures .................................................................................................................................163
Construction, Bank Deposits, and Property Value From Incorporation ....................................... 2 .........................164
'Properly Tax Rates -Direct and Overlapping Governmenls From Incorporation .............................. .: ..................165
Principal Secured. Property Owners for the Year Ended June 30, 1998 .............................................. · ....................166
Legal Debt Margin ..............................................................................................................................................167
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt as of June 30, 1998 ........................................................... 168
Largest Employers by Number of Empoyees as of June 30, 1998 .........................................................................169
iv
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 · MailingAddr~s: P.O. Box 9033 · Ternecula, CA 92589-9033
(909) 694-6444 · Fax (909] 694-1999
June 22, 1999
The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:
I am pleased to submit the proposed Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 1999-00. This fiscal plan was developed
to serve not only as a monetary statement of programs and policies, but as a document that reflects the many goals,
progrmns, and service priorities that the City of Temecula is committed to providing its citizens.
The Fiscal Year 1999-00 Operating Budget has been developed after a considerable review process. Departmental
budget submittals were prepared and reviewed by line item in connection with projected revenues and detailed
performance objectives. The result is this document: a conservative, balanced budget that provides for quality
services while effectively utilizing available resources.
CITY OF TEMECULA PROFILE
The City of Tcmecula is a dynamic community comprised of 48,828 citizens of various cultural backgrounds spread
across 26 square miles of gently rolling hills. The City maintains approximately 141 miles of the 226 miles of
streets within its borders. The City has created 20 parks on 173 developed acres throughout the community which
provide recreation opponanities for both the citizens of Temecula, as well as surrounding communities. Contracted
services provided through Riverside County include police and fire protection. The Temecula Valley Unified
School District provides 16 schools for 15,722 students at the kindergarten through 12th grade levels within the City.
The City of Temecula prides itself on its community focus and quality of life.
As the. Southem California economy continues its expansion phase, Temecula is at a key juncture in its history. The
City 'enjoys some of the strongest economic and demographic ,indicators in the Inland Empire. Its job creation, local
payroll. taxable trade, home sales and values, .income, school performance, and crime rates are all very positive.
Residential construction and population growth are continuing io accelerate. A major regional mall (the Promenade
Mall) is now under construction. The community enjoys a reputation as a family-oriented, beautiful place to live.
REVENUES AND ECONOMIC CONDITION
Fiscal year 1999-00 General Fund revenues are projected to reach $26,521,800, an increase of $3,086,500 or 13.2%
from fiscal year 1998-99, and reflect the continued growth of the local economy. In the past year, the City has
experienced significant interest in relocalion and expansion of existing businesses. The City has continued to work
with the Chamber of Commerce and the Temecula Valley Economic Development Coq~oration in its effort to
encourage the expansion or relocation of industries that generate local sales tax and employment advantages. The
City has also worked with these organizations to develop and market Temecula as a tourist destination.
Temecula's emergence as a center of job growth is prianarily the result of the migration of firms and people to the
Inland Empire from the coastal counties of Southern California. This migration is occurring as the density of land
development in Orange. Los Angeles and San Diego counties has created a shortage of manufacturing distribution
and housing space, and increased space costs.
I~Pnnted on Recyded Paper I
June 22, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City. Council
In most cases, this phenomena is increasing the demand for business space and homes along transportation corridors
in cities directly adjacent to Orange and Los Angeles counties. Temecula is unique in two ways. It has been able to
attract finns and families to leap frog across miles of undeveloped land to locate within its borders. And, the jobs
coming to the City are better paying than the Inland Empire average. Since the City's inception, local leaders have
undertaken a consistent and successrid program to lure high technology finns to the area. These efforts have been
aided by the City's physical beauty and moderate climate. Meanwhile, the 1-15 freeway has given commuters and -
finns located in Temecula ready access to San Diego and Orange County markets, while allowing them to avoid the
land restrictions and high costs of those areas.
The following graphic details the major components of the City's General Fund revenues:
FY 1999-00 Projected General Fund Revenues
(Value in $ Million)
Licenses & Services ($3.78)
Transient Occupancy Tax
($1.04) "~ ~
Sales Tax ($12.49)j''~''' '
Operating Transfer In
($0.88)
:,' i~ ~' /-Intergovernmental ($2.34)
: -~. Investment Interest ($0.92)
~-,..~:. ;. · ...........
· ': .. ~-Other ($0.62)
~-Property Tax ($1.30)
_j/_~I lilt ~--Franchise Fees ($1.31)
Total FY 1999-00 Projected General Fund Revenues $26,521,800
Changes in Revenues: General Fund
Sales and Use Tax: Sales and Use Tax revenue is projected to increase from an estimate of $10,400,000 in FY
1998-99 to $12,487,000 in FY 1999-00. This increase is primarily a result of new retail development related to the
Promenade Mall expected to open in late October 1999. Also contributing to this revenue growth are continued
increases in the automobile and industrial segments of the City's tax base. The City continues to maintain a strong
and diverse sales tax base by promoting economic development in areas such as manufacturing, light industrial, and
retail businesses. Sales tax is the City's largest revenue source representing 47% of the total General Fund revenue.
Temecula continues to exceed the state. county, and surrounding areas with respect to sales per capita.
June 22, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
The following chart compares City sales per capita to the State of California and Riverside County. The prior 12
quarters historical trend is presented.
Quarterly Sales Per Capita
S4,200 ·
S3.500
S~800
& i · · i A · · · · · '~
$1,400
$700
I--,-ci~y o~,,,,~a, --iS--Stale of California +Rive'side County I
Franchise Fees: Franchise Fee revenue is anticipated to increase from $ l, 175,000 to $1,311,500 due to population
growth and commercial development.
Property Tax: The FY 1999-00 revenue estimate for properly taxes is based on an assumed 2% increase in
assessed valuation. Future additional assessed valuation increases will be partially offset by the impact of pending
assessed valuation appeals by property owners. The FY 1999-00 estimate of $1,300,600 represents.approximately
5% of the total General Fund revenues.
Motor Vehicle in Lieu: It is projected that this state subvention will increase by $175,300 to a total of $2,076,000
in FY 1999-00. Motor Vehicle in Lieu fees are distributed by the state on a per capita basis.
Investment Interest: Investment interest is anticipated to decrease from $1,100,000 to $925,000 due to the planned
significant expenditure of General Fund reserves for capital improvement projects in FY 1999-00.
Licenses, Permits, and Charges for Services: An overall decrease from $4,099,01}0 to $3,776,500 is projected in
FY 1999-00. This decrease is due to a possible reduction in building inspection and plan check fees..
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): The City collects an 8% tax on the amount of all transient (30 days or less)
lodging rentals. TOT revenue is projected to be $1,036,000 in FY 1999-00, a 5% increase from the prior year.
Chan~es in Revenues: Other Funds
Gas Tax: A 6% increase in Gas Tax revenue is projected (to $876,600 in FY 1999-00), based on anticipated
population gro~vth. This revenue is used for the maintenance, rehabilitation and improvement of public streets.
Parks/Lighting Services Special Tax: This special tax is assessed to all real property owners and is used for the
ongoing operation and maintenance of the City's park and recreation facilities, recreational and community service ·
programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights, and traffic signals. A 1% increase is projected (to $2,592,190)
for FY 1999-00.
June 22, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Community Services District Assessments: These assessments represent parcel charges to real property owners
for various service levels such as residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse
collection, and road maintenance. The projected amount of these assessments for FY 1999-00 is $3,203,810, a 4%
increase from the prior year.
EXPENDITURES
Total General Fund expenditures (excluding operating transfers out) are proposed to be $24,776,410 i'n FY 1999-00,
an increase of $2,888,870 or 13.2% from FY 1998-99. This proposed expenditure level results in a margin of
projected revenues oyer proposed expenditures in the General Fund of $1,745,390. In addition, operating transfers
out are proposed to set aside reserves for use in funding capital improvement projects ($725,000), and for replacing
computer workstations ($233,000).
Public safety continues to represent the largest single portion of the General Fund operating budget at 37%.
Proposed expenditures for police and fire services total $9,128,240 (net of a $1.67 million fire tax credi0. Proposed
public safety expenditure increases total $1,275,876 for FY 1999-00 and include the addition of four sworn police
officers (in response to population growth and the impacts of the regional mall), and the addition of six pammedics
to staff a two-person paramedic unit.
Substantial expenditure increases are proposed for the area of public works. Proposed public works expenditures for
FY 1999-00 total $4,508,160, an increase of $756,571 from the prior fiscal year. This increase is a result of the
City's aggressive capital improvement program, and focus on improving traffic flow in the City.
The fol Iowing graphic includes a breakdown of general fund operating expenditures by function:
FY 1999-00 General Fund Budget by Function
Econ Dev/Comm
Support
5%
Public Safety
37%
...::., :.~?~... . .
/'
Public Works
18%
CFD 88-12
Reimbursement
4%
_/
Administration
, ': ~..""~'
5%
~ ~'~_Comm Development
18%
FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The City Council developed a Mission Statement in 1991 which created a long-term vision for development of City
policy. The Mission Statement is found on page 11 and addresses cosnmunity safety, housing, jobs, financial
stability, and quality of life issues. Using this Statement as a foundation, in November 1993 the Council adopted the
City's first General Plan, which sets forth a long-term comprehensive plan for the physical development of the City
through the Plan's Vision Statement. The elements in the General Plan are land use, circulation, housing, open
space and conservation, growth management, public safety, noise, air quality, design and economic development.
Based on the goals and policies identified in the plan, staff prepared objectives and performance measures to begin
implementing the plan.
June 22, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of tile City Council
During FY 1995-96, the City began a strategic planning process to expand the City's vision beyond the scope of the
elements listed above. Team building workshops were held with all City staff which resulted in the development of
a value statement by the employees of the City. This value statement, found on page 12, is used as 1) a tool in the
employee hiring/selection process, 2) a guide in conducting City business, and 3) a statement to the citizens
affirming what the City, as an organization, stands for and the level of service they can expect firore the City.
A goal and priority setting workshop was held with the City Counci.l in November, 1998. The primary area 0f focus
was in addressing deficiencies in the City's traffic circulation system. Other items of discussion included a review
of City reserve policies, and economic developmcnlIredcvelopment strategies.
Depamnental goals and objectives are updated annually and are included in the Operating Budget section of this
document. Goals and objectives are listed by program within each department. The following is a partial listing of
the FY 1999-00 performance objectives as they relate to key elements of the City's Mission Slatement and Vision
Statement.
Maintain fiscal stability:
· Mainlain a 30% reserve for economic uncertainty
· Emphasize safety and liquidity over yield when investing City funds.
Maintain a safe/secure environment:
Respond to calls for police services in a timely manner. Perform public safety education programs, mainlain
neighborhood watches, and conduct timely traffic investigations. The FY 1999-00 budget includes the addition
of t~vo patrol officers, a traffic officer, and a special enforcement (narcotics) officer.
Respond to all fire emergency calls within five (5) minutes. Conduct a comprehensive fire education program.
Continue to improve emergency services through file funding of a paramedic squad to supplement existing
emergency medical services.
Provide quality jobs and promote commerce:
· Encourage the growth and expansion of existing industries by providing' high quality municipal services,
facilities, and economic development assistance.
· Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high quality goods and services
for residents, workers, and tourists.
· Use redevelopment powers and opportunities to enhance development opportunities.
Target high quality busin. esses from the following industry categories: small to mid-sized businesses, high-tech
manufacturing and communication services, paper and plastics, health-related manufacturing services, and
vineyards/vintners.
· Utilize the award-winning "Temecula Fast Track Process" to provide one-stop streamlined development
permitting.
· Develop and maintain an effective marketing program to publicize the virtues of Temecula.
· Develop Temecula as a comprehensive, recognizable tourist destination with a range of attractions.
Encourage programs for all ages:
Increase the number of family oriented progr,/m opporluniticS at the Temecula Community Center.
Determine the feasibility of providing City-sponsored recreation opportunities at the Promenade Mall site, such
as a story time for kids, musical presentations, and art exhibits.
5
June 22, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Provide adequate infrastructure concurrent with development:
· Update the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Design and construct capital projects within
funding and time requirements specified in the CIP.
· Allocate $28.1 million in FY 1999-00 for Citywide circulation 'projects to improve traffic flow and alleviate
traffic congestion on the City's major freeway overpasses and near the Promenade Mall.
Utilize human resources effectively:
· Meet with City Council in a strategic planning forum.
· Conduct an annual retreat for department directors to establish service level and program goals.
· Provide in-house training opportunities for all employees to enhance productivity and performance.
· Administer an employee recognition program including quarterly Temecula Pride/Good Deed Award
luncheons.
Enhance and revitalize historic area:
· Work with Old Toxvn merchants, property owners, civic groups, and the development commumty to:
1) Make private and public improvements in Old Town
2) Develop projects that will revitalize the Old Town economy
3) Assist in the private rehabilitation of buildings in Old Town
· Promote and encourage participation in the FaCade hnprovement Program.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The budget document has been formatted to detail file operational goals, objectives, and performance measurements
of each depamnenL Finance Depamnent staff has worked with all departments to identify significant
accomplishments, as well as to develop qualilalive and quantitative performance measures. The goal of the
organization is to establish a comprehensive reporting system which will give the public, City Council, and City
staff the ability to evaluale the level and value of service provided to the community.
IMPACT OF LEGISLATION ON THE BUDGET
Currently, the State of California is projecting a $4.3 billion budget surplus for FY 1998-99. There are several
proposals on file table in file State budget negotiations that may provide some benefit to the City. The various
proposals include the following:
The State Senate version of the budget contains a cap on the "ERAF" shill of properly tax revenues from local
governments to school districts that was inilialed in the early 1990's, so that the growth of property taxes would
go to local governments. This proposal would amount to an increase in property tax revenues to local
governments of approximately $234 million in the first year.
TIle State Assembly version of the budget does not include any "ERAF' relief, but instead includes a $200
million one-time paymenl to local govermnenls, requiring file revenue to be spent on libraries, streets, and
parks.
Although currently not a pan of any version of the budget, the State Senate Republicans have a proposal to
repeal file ability of counties to clmrge booking fees to cities for the cost of booking prisoners into the county
jail system, with the Slate reimbur-~ing counties for any lost revenue. A repeal of the booking fee would save
the City approximately $140,000 annually.
June 22, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
While there is some reason for optimism, there arc also several issues that may have a negative future impact on the
City's budget. One such issue is the effort to accelerate reductions in the vehicle license fees paid on all vehicles
registered in the State. The majority of this State revenue is apportioned to local governments (the City is projecting
to receive $2,076,000 in FY 1999-00). The State is currently committed to using State General Fund revenues to
replace any revenues that may be lost by local governments as a result of reductions in the vehicle license fee.
While the State may currently be in a position to fulfill this commitment, the State's ability and willingness to do so
indefinitely is questionable.
STAFFING POLICY
The proposed FY 1999-00 Operating Budget is a well-planned budget that increases the City's current levels of'
service to the community. City staffing levels are continuously reviewed to identify over/understaffing so that
appropriate changes can be made either during the annual budget process or during the mid-year review. The total
City staffing for bY' 1999-00 will include 127.5 regular full-time equivalent (FTE) positions, an increase of 10
positions from the prior year.
ACCOUNTING, AUDITING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING POLICY
The City of Temecula receives an independent audit annually and maintains a solid internal audit capacity. The City
prepares all annual financial reports in strict compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures (GAAP),
as outlined by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The City maintains a strong system of
internal controls. which has resulted in an unqualified audit opinion for the past several years.
RESERVE POLICY
The City Council previously identified an objective of developing and maintaining a reserve of 30% of the General
Fund budget for economic uncerlalnties and contingencies, which will amount to $7,432,923 of the projected
$12,965,999 total General Fund balance at June 30, 2000.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT POLICY
The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) was established to provide a comprehensive, balanced
neighborhood and community park system in Temecula by constantly reviewing growth,' demographics, and
available facilities. The TCSD also provides tree management, refuse hauling, and a recycling 'program for the
community. Oversight responsibility rests with the City Council, who serves as 'TCSD's Board of Directors.' All
services are funded primarily by fees and a special tax charged on the assessor's. parcel roll. The proposed budget
for TCSD totals $7,957,230. The budget includes additional operating and maintenance costs for the Temecula
Valley Museum and 29.5 acres of new parks that have been recently dedicated. At the council's direction, the City
will make a $1,176,000 contribution to the TCSD budget in FY 1999-00. This contribution represents an increase of
$325,980 from the prior fiscal year.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY POLICY
On April 7, 1991, the City Council adopted ordinances which adopted the Redcvelopmcnt Plan for Temecula. This
action established the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA), which assumed responsibility for the plan effective
July 1, 1991. The RDA is responsible for enhancing the existing character and economic foundation of the project
area by removing blight and promoting economic revitalization. It is also designed to provide quality housing
opportunities for low to moderate income citizens. The RDA is funded primarily by property tax increment revenue.
The total gross tax increment revenue for FY 1999-00 is projected to be $5,795,000. This amount includes funds to
be used for low and moderate income housing purposes, administrative costs, debt service, and redevelopment
projects.
June 22, 1999
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY
The City's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is presented to the City Council under separate cover.
This program provides a multi-year plan for capilal improvements which is updated annually to ensure compliance
with the program. The impact of capital projects on maintenance and operating costs were taken into consideration
in the development of the operating budget. Circulation, infrastructure, parks, redevelopment, and other various
projects are identified in the CIP budget with estimated project costs totaling $267,876,560 over the next five years.
In accordance with City Council direction and community needs, emphasis has been placed on traffic/circulation
projects in FY 1999-00. The CIP reflects an aggressive $28,143,560 in traffic/circulation project costs, and
$47,377,460 in total project costs to be incurred in FY 1999-00.
CASH MANAGEMENT/INVESTMENT POLICY
In accordance with Government Code Sections 53601 through 53659, the City of Temecula annually adopts an
investment policy identifying the rules and' procedures that apply to investment instruments that may be used in
investing idle cash. Temecula's investment policy is reviewed and updated annually, and adopted by the City
Council in July each year. The policy follows the objectives of maintaining safety, liquidity, and yield (in that-order
of priority). It is imporlant to note that the City does not invest in high risk investments such as derivatives and
reverse purchase agreements. All investments are made in compliance with the Government Code and the City of
Temecula Investment Policy.
DEBT POLICY
The City of Temecula is in the process of developing and adopted specific debt policies. The proposed document
includes policies for determining the City's approach to land secured and conduit financing. It is the City's intent to
support projects which address a public need and provide a public benefit. These policies are also designed to
comply with Section 53312.7(a) of the Government Code.
The City has not issued any general obligation debl.
CONCLUSION
The FY 1999-00 Operating Budget is balanced and provides for increased services in the areas of public safety,
public works, and parks and recreation. The budget was constructed by utilizing a conservative approach in
projecting revenues and corresponding expenditures. This conservative approach is necessary, as the City must
continue m be sensitive to potential changes in the condition of the State and local economy. ff the final State
Budget results in any adverse impacts to the City, or if local conditions change that negatively impact the projected
revenue stream, this budget will allow for staff will return to the Council with recommendations to make th~
appropriate adjustments.
I would like to thank the City Council, all the Department Directors, and their staffs for all of the assistance and
support that was provided during this year's budget process. I would like to give special thanks to Genie Roberts,
Director of Finance, Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director, and the Finance Department staff for their long
hours and dedication to the City and fl~is budget process.
Slhawn Nelson
Acting City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 1999-00 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON
CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY 1999-
00 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the
final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula entitled "City of Temecula 1999-00 Annual Operating Budget" is hereby adopted.
Section 2.
appropriations:
That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager.
C. The City Council must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the
Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The City Council must authorize any changes to the Schedule of Authorized
Positions. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part-time staff as necessary within
the limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E.' The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000, Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may
authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in
excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve change orders
on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by
Council.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 1999, are hereby
appropriated for such contracts or obligations for 1999-00.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22~
day of June, 1999.
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 99- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22"d day of June, 1999, by the following vote of the
City Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
10
1989
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Temecula is to maintain a safe, secure, clean, healthy, and orderly
community; to balance the utilization of open space, parks, trail facilities~ quality jobs, public
.transportation, diverse housing, and adequate. infrastructure~ and to enhance and revitalize1
historic areas.
The City will encourage programs for all age groups, utilize its human resources, and preserve its
natural resources while stimulating technology, promoting commerce, and utilizing sound fiscal
policy.
It is the City Council's resolve that this mission will instill a sense of pride and accomplishment
in its citizens and that the City will be known as a progressive, innovative, balanced and
environmentally sensitive community.
11
CITY O F TEME CULA
VALUE STATEMENT
As employees of the City of Temecula, in striving to be unique in our
local government, we value the following:
E
EAMWORK among all employees.
NHANCEMENT of the work environment through
open lines of communication.
V
-C
UTUAL respect of others.
DUCATION of employees and citizens about the
operations and accomplishments of the City.
USTOMER service is our most important product.
UNLIMITED potential for continued personal
growth and organizational development.
A
EADERSHIP in local government.
SSUMING 100% responsibility for projects and
assignments.
12
City of Temecula
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION A WARD
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award of
Distinguished Budget Presentation to the City of Temocula for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
1998.
In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a
policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communication device.
The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program
requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award.
NMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCi
Distinguished
Budget Presentation
PRESENTED TO
City of Temecula,
California
For the Fiscal Year Beginning
July 1,
President Executive Director
13
CiO~ of Temecula
CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS A WARD
Co, li:ornia Sod~t,g o-
Certificate of Award
Excellence in Operational Budgeting 1998-99
Presented to
City of Temecula
recognizes the achievement of Excellence in Operational Budgeting and reflects an ouutanding budget document
and the underlying budgeting process through which the budget is implemented.
March 1, 1999
Dedicated to Excellence in Municipal Financial Management
14
Ci,tv of Temecula
DIRECTORY
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
Acting City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant to the City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk/Director of Support Services
Director of Finance
Chief Building Official
Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Director of Community Services
Planning Manager
Housing/Redevelopment Manager
Chief of Police
Fire Chief
Shawn D. Nelson
James O'Grady
Gary Thornhill
Grant Yates
Peter M. Thorson
· Susan W. Jones
Genie Roberts
Tony Elmo
Bill Hughes
Herman D. Parker
Debbie Ubnoske
John Meyer
Pete Labahn
Mike Brown
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Director of Finance
Assistant Finance Director
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Accountant
Accountant
Administrative Secretary
Accounting Specialist
Accounting Specialist
Accounting Specialist
Purchasing Specialist
Accounting Assistant
Accounting Assistant (Project) ·
Genie Roberts
Tim McDermott
Gus Papagolos
Bill Pattison
Vacant
Linda Norton
Reta Weston
Barbara Smith
Jada Yonker
Mary Vollmuth
Zenaida Smith
Cassandra MananSingh
15
City of Temecula
CITY ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
COIVH~SSIONS
crllz~s
oF
TEMECtLA
I
CITY
COUNCIL
~ D. Nelson
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
JimO'Gtady
, I , ,
PuNic Wodcs Cormtory RedeveloptrerlCity Clede
Bill HtChes Developmerl Sul~pott ices
(Acting) C~yThornlill Jo~Meyer SusanW. Jo~s
I
ADMINISTRATION
Ge~e Robets
I
City A1TORNEY
PeterM. TIn~
I
Mice
Pete Lsl~ahn
I
PUBLIC SAFETY
F~
lleBn~wn
16
City of Temecula
BUDGE PROCESS
The development of the operating budget began in November 1998 when a goal and priority setting workshop was
held with the City Council. The primary area of focus was how to address deficiencies in the City's traffic
circulation system. Other items of discussion included a review of City reserve policies, and economic
development/redevelopment strategies.
In February 1999 the first budget workshop was held with the City. Manager and all department directors. This
workshop included a briefing on the status of the current fiscal y. ear budget, a review of the FY 1999-00 budget
process calendar, and a discussion on essential principles and elements of the budget process. Staff was provided
with a practical application to assist in the development .of the departmental budget requests, which included the
following:
Review and evaluate current goals (and performance measurements)
Identify new goals and programs
Identify the impacts of new programs. on existing resources. Examine organizational efficiency,
and reallocate existing resources to address these impacts
Identify additional resource requirements (if existing resources will be exhausted)
In March a second budget workshop ~vas held with the City Manager, all department directors, and other key City
staff me~nbers responsible for budget development. The operating budget preparation guidelines were distributed at
this time. The guidelines served to outline the policies and procedures to be used in preparing the FY 1999-00
budgel. Clearly defined budget requirements and time sensitive budget document objectives were discussed,
ensuring complete and accurate understanding by all. The milestones outlined in the guidelines reflected the
involvement of the City Manager and City staff in reviewing and discussing policies and service guidelines, along
with the concurrent development of financial projections, objectives, and requirements at the staff level. With this
approach, the policies, service guidelines, and priorities which guide expenditure considerations were incorporated
into the proposed budget prior to formal submission to the City Council.
Individual meetings were later held by key Finance Department staff with each department to assist in the budget
development process. Assistance was provided to each department in reviewing historical expenditure information,
personnel costs, and in refining departmental goals, objectives, and performance measures.
For the purposes of budget preparation and fonnuialion, departmental budget submittals consisted of detail by
expenditure line item. Specific justification was required for the following:
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Significant expenditure clmnges
Personnel costs, including all temporary and project personnel costs, as well as. any proposed
staffing increases
Contracted services and supplies (both new and recurring)
Purchases of new equipment
Outlays for improvements and facility 'repairs
All special project expenses and one-time expenses
Travel, conference, and education expenses
Dues, memberships, and publications
Review and analysis was then conducted of each department's request. The review of the budget requests included
comparative analysis of historical and current expenditure levels. The information was compiled for review by the
City Manager. Key City Manager and Finance Department staff then held meetings with each department director
to discuss the budget request and obtain additional information to assist in the assessment of the requests. The
evaluation and final recommendation involved assigning relative priorities to the departmental requests and then
comparing the associated costs to available funding resources. Following this review, department
directors adjusted line item requests in accordance with the City Manager's direction.
Finally, meetings were held individually with each council member to review the components of the proposed
budget, prior to formal consideration for adoption.
The Temecula Municipal Code requires that the City Manager submit the proposed annual budget and salary plan to
the City Council for approval. The Municipal Cede also requires that the Director of Finance compile the budget
revenue and expenditure estimales for the City Manager.
17
City of Temecula
BUDGET PROCESS (Continued)
The City Council approves the annual budget submitted by the City Manager prior to the beginning of the new fiscal
year. All appropriations lapse at year end except for those relating to encumbrances which are appmved for
carryover to the subsequent year. The City Council has the legal authority to amend the budget at any time during
the fiscal year. The City Manager has the authority to make adjustments within departmental budgets. Adjustments
between depa~ments require the approval of the City Council.
Budgetary controls are maintained to ensure compliance with the budget as approved by the City Council. The level
of bUdgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amoun0 is at the
department level.
Department directors and other management staff with budgetary responsibililjes are provided with bi-wcekly'
budget versus actual expenditure reports. Quarterly financial statements are prepared for the City COuncil which
include a budget-to-actual analysis for both revenues and expenditures. Revenue projections are revised as part of
the mid:year budget analysis, and appropriations are adjusted, if required.
The following chart illustrates the budget phases which span the fiscal year.
Policy/Strategy
Development Plhase
Departmental
Budget Development Budget
Phase
Guidelines
Review Phase
Adoption Phase
COUNCIL
WORKSHOP
Program
Objectives
I
Finance/
Executive
Review
I
$
· Council
Briefings
OPERATING
BUDGET
I
Financial
Projections
hnplementation
Phase
Bi-Weekly
Budget
Reports
Quarterly
Financial
Statements
I
Mid-Year
Analysis &
Revision
18
City of Temecula
UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET DOCUMENT
This budget document provides the public with concise and readable information about City government and
displays the City's objectives and budget for the 1999.00 fiscal year.
The budget document begins with the City Manager's transmittal letter, which provides an overview of the Fiscal
Year 1999-00 Operating Budget by highlighting programs and major projects. The budget document is then divided
into the following sections:
· Introduction
· . Budget Summaries
· Operating Budget:
· General Fund
· Community Services District
· Internal Service Funds
· Redevelopment Agency
· Community Development Block Grant
· Capital Improvement Program Sununary
· Appendix
The Budget Summaries section provides revenue and expenditure analysis. This section presents historical and
categorical data for comparative purposes. Staffing levels are also summarized.
The Operating Budgets section contains the program description, key objectives, performance measures, and
resource allocation plans for each operating program. Budget information is organized by department and identifies
the major services provided by the City.
Finally, the Appendix includes:
·
·
·
·
·
·
· ·
·
·
·
Glossary of Terms
Assessed and Estimated Actthai Value of Taxable Property (Values in Thousands) from Incorporation
Federal Grant Expenditures
Construction, Bank Deposits, and Properly Value (Values in Thousands) from Incorporation
-Property Tax Rates - Direct and Overlapping Governments from Incorporation
Principal Secured Properly OWners - June 30, 1998
Legal Debt Margin
Computation of Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt - june 30, 1998
Largest Employers by Number of Employecs- June 30, 1998
Index
Additional information on the City's fiscal affairs is available in the following documents at the City offices:
· City Treasurer's Monthly Reports
· Quarterly Financial Statements
· Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
19
Ci.tv of Temecula
DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS
The City of Temecula revenues and expenditures are accounted for in a series of funds. Each fund is an autonomous
accounting entity, established in accordance with legal and professional accounting standards. Funds are used to
segregate the various financial activities of a governmental entity and to demonstrate compliance with specific
regulations, restrictions or limitations, (i.e., demonstrating that restricted revenues are spent only for allowed
purposes).
Funds used in government are classified into three broad categories: governmental, proprietary and fiduciary.
Governmental funds include activities usually associated with a typical state or local government's operations
(public safety, general government activities, etc.). Proprietary funds are used in government to account for
activities often found in the private sector (utilities, sladiums and golf courses are prime examples). Fiduciary funds*
are utilized in situations where the government is acting in a ~ducimy capacity as a trustee or agent.
The funds utilized by the City of Temecula, governmental and proprietary, are detailed below.
General Fund
This is the general operating fund for the City, utilized to account for all resources not required to be
accounted for in another fund.
Soecial Revenue Funds
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for specific resources that are legally restricted to expenditure
for particular purposes.
Gas Tax Fund The City maintains the fund to account for the Highway User's Tax revenues received from
the Stale of California under Sections 2105, 2 107 and 2107.5 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Community Services District Benefit assessments are charged to property owners within the District (City)
to provide recreation, park development, street lighting slope maintenance, refuse collection, and
e~nergency road construction and maintenance. Specific services provided are identified as follows:
· :. Parks and Recreation - Parks and recreation facility operations and maintenance, community
recreation programs
· :' Service Level "A" - Arterial street lighting traffic signals, and median maintenance
· :. Service Level "B" - Residential street lighting
· :. Service Level "C" - Perimeter landscaping and .slope maintenance
· :. Service Level "D" - Refuse collection, recycling, and street sweeping
· :. Service Level '~R" - Street and road ~naintenance
Redevelopment AEency This fund is used to account for the twenty percent (20%) of property tax
increment that must be reserved for use in low and moderate income housing programs.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) This fund is used to account for grants received from the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development C'HUD") through the Riverside County Economic
Development Corporation. The grants are used for the development of a viable community by providing
decent housing a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for
persons of low and moderate income.
20
City of Temecula
DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS (Continued)
Debt Service Funds
Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources and payment of all general long-
term debt obligations of the City and related entities.
Redevelopment Agency This fund is used to account for tie payment of interest and principal on
outstanding tax increment bonds and otter debt of tie Redevelopment Agency paid from tax increment
revenue.
Community Services District This fund is used to account for tie payment of interest and principal on
outstanding certificates of participation issued to finance tie construction of a community recreation center.
Caoital Proiects Funds
Capital Projects Funds are used to 'account for financial resources used for tie acquisition and improvement
of major capital facilities.
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
Internal Service Funds
Internal Service Fund are used to account for tie financing of goods or services by one department to otter
deparanents of the City on a cost reimbursement basis.
Insurance This Internal Service Fund was established to fund and account for tie City's liability and
properly insurance costs.
Vehicles This Internal Service Fund was created to depreciate vehicles over tieir estimated useful lives,
and to accu~nulate resources for the purchase of future replacement vehicles.
Information Systems This Internal Service Fund was developed to fund and account for computer and
telephone system operating and maintenance expenses, depreciation of all related computer 'and telephone
equipment over tieir estimated useful lives, and to accumulate resources for future equipment purchases.
Support Services This' internal Service Fund was established as a cost center for the~ City's central
duplicating and mailing activities.
Facilities This Internal Service Fund was established to account for tie cost of City Hall and City
Maintenance Facility operations and maintenance.
21
City of Temecula
SUA~tARY OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
Fund Accounting
The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a
separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing
accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate.
Government resources are allocated to, and accounted for, in individual funds based upon the purposes for which
they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The various funds arc .grouped in the
financial statements in this report into generic fund types and broad fund categories as follows:
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Debt Service Funds
Capital Projects Funds
Internal Service Funds
Insurance
Vehicles
Information Systems
Support Services
Facilities
Accounting Basis
All governmental funds are accounted for and budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Their
revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. The primary revenue
sources susceptible to accrual are properly and sales taxes, franchise fees, transient occupancy taxes, investment
income, fines and forfeitures collected by County courts, gas lax subventions, and motor vehicle-in-lieu subventions.
Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability
is incurred. An exception to this general rule is principal and interest due on general long-term debt which is
recognized when due.
Internal Service Funds are accounted for and budgeted using the accruai basis of accounting, i.e., revenues are
recognized in the period earned and expenses are recognized in the period incurred.
Encumbra~.ce accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and Other commitments for the expenditure of
funds are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is employed in the governmental
fundS: Open encumbrances are recorded as reservation of fund balance since the commitments will be paid by
subsequent years budget appropriations. Encumbrances do not constitute expenditures or liabilities.
22
City of Temecula
EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES
General Fund
~
A~:tud
1996-97
........
Actual
1997-98
e$timntmd Proje~t~d
i998-99 1999-00
BProperty Tax
Pronertv Tax The valuation of property in the City is
determined by the Riverside County Tax Assessor. The
County levies a base tax at the rate of one percent (1%)
of assessod valuation. Approximately 4.9 percent of the
base one percent levy is allocated to the City.
;l'he 1999-00 revenue estimate for property tax reflects a
2.5 percent increase over the projected 1998-99 amount.
This increase reflects that assessed valuation increases
realized as a result of new development are being
partially offset by the impact of pending property owner
assessed valuation appeals.
Franchise Fees The City imposes fees on refuse
lmuling, gas, electric and cable television companies
operating in the City. The fees range from one to eight
percent (1-8%) of gross receipts. Overall, an 1'1.6
percent increase is projected in these fees in 1999-00
from die 1998-99 estimated a:nount. This increase is
reflective of continued commercial and residential
growth in the City.
: .:u('
: :';k ,aa./~,
: ;.O', '.,.",,'/"""
wiJll.I)lp)~dram
· 1~,(, ~,,h(,.d/'
· ., ..,,~"
.,a
Actual
199~.97
A~ml i~timn~xl
1997-98 1998-99
· ItrenehiN Fee,
Pro~
1999-00
· .,/' I. '~'~;L
~., ,/",~
u,
Actre]
I ~)6-97
ii .............
Proj=c~d
Sales and Use Taxes In accordance with the California
Revenue and Taxation Cede, 'the State 'of California
imposes a 7.75 percent sales and use tax on all taxable
sales in the City. The City receives 1.0 percent of the
taxable sales in the City, and 0.50 percent is authorized by
"Measure A" which is levied within Riverside County for
various transportation pmT. oses.
Sales m.x is the City's largest revenue source representing
Actual Eatlrnat=d
,~7-~s im-~ 47.1 percent of the total General Fund revenue. In late
· S.le..ndU.tTu October 1999 the Promenade Mall and related "power
center" is expected to open in the City, thus adding to the
City's already strong retail base. As a result of sales tax
generated by the mall, power center, and related retail
development, plus continued growth in the industrial, autos, and transportation components of the local economy,
the 1999-00 revenue projection for sales tax reflects a 20.1 percent increase from the 1998-99 estimate.
23
Ci(v of Temecula
EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES (Continued)
Prooertv Transfer Tax The Temecula Municipal Code authorizes the imposition of a transfer tax on real propony
sold in the City. The tax rate is $0.275 for each $500 of purchase value. The amount projected for 1999-00 of
$295,000 represents an increase of $20,000 from 1998-99.
Transient Occuoancv Tax The Tcmccula Municipal
Code authorizes the City-to levy a tax for the privilege
of occupying lodgings on a transient basis. The tax is
asse'ssed at a rate of eight percent (8%). The estimated
Transient Occupancy Tax revenue for 1999-00 of
$1,036,000 represents a 4.7 percent increase from 1998-
99.
Licenses and Permits The California Government
Code and State Constitution gives cities the authority to
assess certain license and pennit fees as a means of
recovering the cost of regulating various activities.
Examples include building permits and business
licenses.
A clue I
1996-97
Actual EstimatedProjected
1997-98 1998-99 19994)0
ITramsJeut Occupant-/Tax
Charees for Services Service charges or fees are imposed on the user for a specific service rendered based on the
rationale that the benefitling party should bear the cost of the service rather than the general public.
Fines and Forfeitures The California Vehicle and Penal Codes impose fines and penalties for traffic violations
and vehicular parking. These revenues are collected by Riverside County through the County court system and a
portion distributed to the City, less an adininistrative overhead cost. Effective July 1, 1993 the City assumed
responsibility for the administmlion and collection of parking fines.
Investment Interest The City pools its available cash from various funds and invests in instruments as allowed in
file City's investment policy approved by the City Council. Earnings are allocated to various funds on the basis of
proportionate cash balances. A 15.9% decrease in investment interest is anticipated in 1999-00 due to the planned
use of reserves to fund capital improvement projects.
Inter~overnmental The primary' revenue included in this category is the state allocated motor vehicle in-lieu tax.
Section 11005 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code imposes an annual license fee equivalent to 2% of the
market value of motor vehicles in-lieu of local property taxes.' The code.also specifies that 81.25 percent of the
revenues are to be divided equally between cities and counties, and apportioned on the basis of population. The
Projcc~J
1999-00
Actual Actual Estima~d
J 996-97 1997-~ 1998-99
[] Motor Vr|jjele In I,ieu
1999-00 projected motor vehicle in-lieu revenue of
$2,074,700 represents a 9.2 percent increase from the
1998-99 estimated amount duc to continued population
growth in the City. It is anticipated that any further
reduction in this revenue in 1999-00 as a result of State
legislation will be backfilled by other State revenues (at
least for 1999-00).
Reimbursements This category of revenue includes
the recovery of personnel costs that arc allocated to
various capital improvement projects, and are thus
reimbursed by various special revenue funding sources.
Also included in this category are charges to the
Temecula Community Services District and Temecula
Redevelopment Agency for administrative overhead and
other services provided by the City.
24
CRy of Temecula
EXPLANATION OF MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES (Continued)
Other Funds
Gas Tax Funds The State of California assesses a tax on gasoline purchases as authorized by Sections 2105, 2106,
2107 and 2107.5 of the California Streets and Highways Cede. A portion of this tax is allocated to the City based on
a per capita formula established by law. These funds are earmarked for the maintenance, rehabilitation or
improvement of public streets. Gas tax revenues are projected to increase to $876,600 in 1999-00, a 6.8 percent
'increase from the 1998-99 estimate.due to population growth in the City.
Assessments The Temecula CommunitS' Services District levies a .charge on real property to provide street
lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse collection, and road maintenance.
Parks/Liffhtinff Services S!~ecial Tax This special tax was approved by the voters of Temecula on March 4, 1997.
Proceeds from the special tax are required to be used for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and servicing of the
City's public parks and recreation facilities, recreational and community service programs, median landscaping,
arterial street lights and traffic signals.
Tax Increment The Temecula Redevelopment Agency receives the penion of ad valorem property taxes resulting
from increases in the assessed valuation within the redevelopment project area over the base year assessed valuation.
As required by California Health and Safety Cede, 20 percent of the gross tax increment is set aside in a Low and
Mederate Income Housing Fund to be used to increase, improve, or preserve the supply of low and reedcrate income
housing. A two percent increase in tax increment revenue is projected due to anticipated increases in assessed
valuation (which will partially be offset by the impact of pending property owner assessed valuation appeals).
25
Ci(y of Temecula
DEBT ADMINISTRATION
As of June 30, 1999, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency had $13,895,000 of Tax Allocation bonds outstanding.
The bonds were issued to finance various public improvements within the Agency's redevelopment project area.
The bonds bear interest from 5.25% to 5.5%, and are payable from property tax increment revenues generated
within the project area.
As of June 30, 1999, the Temecula Public Facilities Financing Corporation had $4,370,000 of Certificates of
Participation outstanding. The Certificates of Participation were issued for the benefit of the Temecula Community
Services District. Proceeds from the sale of the certificates were used to finance the construction of a community
recreation center. The certificates bear interest at rates ranging from 3.4% to 7.125%, and are payable from the
citywide rates and charges levied on real property located within the District.
As of June 30, 1999, the City had no general obligation bonds outslanding.
71~e 1999-00 fiscal year debt service requirements for the above-mentioned obligations are as follows:
Issue Interest
Date Description Rates Principal Interest Total
1993 Tax Allocation Bonds
5.25 - 5.5% $ 690,000 $ 758,550 $ 1,448,550
1992 Certificates of Participation 3.4 - 7.125%
200.000 293.965 493.965
TOTAL $ 890,000 $ 1,052,515 $ 1,942,515
26
City of Temecula
GANN APPROPRM TIONS LlltilT
Article XIIIB of the Califomia State Constitution, more commonly referred to as the Gann Initiative or Gann Limit,
was approved by California voters in November 1979 and placed limits on the mount of proceeds of taxes that state
and local governmental agencies can receive and spend each year.
The limit is different for each agency and the limit changes each year. Each year's limit is based on the amount of
tax proceeds that were authorized to be spent in fiscal year 1978-79 in each agency, modified for changes in
inflation and population in each subsequent year. For cities which incorporated after 1978-79, such as the City of
Temecula, the initial appropriations limit was set by the voters at the time of incorporation. In accordance with the
Government Code Section 56842.6 the City was required to recompute the Gann limit since incorporation based on
actual tax revenues and place the new limit on the ballot at the first general election after incorporation which was
November 10, 1992.
Each year the City Council must adopt, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the following year. Using cost of
living data provided by the State of California, and population and per capita personal income data provided by the
State Department of Finance, the City's Appropriations Limit for 1999-00 has been computed to be $28,878,773.
Appropriations subject to the limitation in the 1999-00 budget total $19,675,664, which is $9,203,109 less than the
computed limit.
Additional appropriations to the budget funded by non-tax sources such as service charges, restricted revenues from
other agencies, grants or beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, any
supplemental appropriations funded through increased tax sources would be subject to the Appropriations Limit and
could not exceed the $9,203,109 variance indicated. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater
than $9,203,109 from budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations
Limits, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years or voter approval of an increase in the City's
Appropriations Limit.
$30,000,000J
$25,000,000 /
$20,000,000'/
$15,000,000 /
$10,000,000 ~
$5,000,0~.-~~~
1996-9~
1997-98 1998-99 1999-00
Appropriations Subject to Limit · Legal Limit ]
27
City of Temecula
COMMUNITY PROFILE
GENERAL CITY DATA
Date Incorporated:
Form of Government
City Employment:
Number of Authorized Positions
Population ' '
Number of registered voters
Median family income
Area
Streets
City Maintained Streets
Altitude:
Rainfall:
December 1~ !989
Council/Manager
127.5
·. 48,828
22,000
$ 45,655
26 Square' Miles
226 Miles
141 Miles
1000-1200 Feet
19.52 inches per year
Located: 55 miles N of San Diego; 85 miles SE of Los Angeles
PUBLIC SAFETY DATA
Fire Protection: (contract with Riverside County)
Number of Stations·
Number of Staff- Firefighters/Officers
Number of Volunteer Firefighters
4
49
30
Police Protection: (contract with Riverside Count)')
Number of Stations
Number of Sworn Officers
Supervision / Managemen1
2
42 u
9
EDUCATIONAL· DATA
Education: Tcmccula Unified School District
NumBer of Schools 16
' Number of:Teachers
Number of Studeros 15,722
Libraries: (conWact with Riverside Count)') 1
RECREATIONAL / TOURIST DATA
Recreation and Culture: Parks
Number of Acres ( 173 acres developed)
20
312
Hotcl/Motcls:
Number of Lodging Propertics 10
Total Number of Roo:ns 719
28
City of Temecula
L 0C,4 TOR M,4 P
Catann Idmd
10
pd., o,--
Loc~r M,p of
TEMF.,CUX~ REGION
andSouthemCnlifornia
29
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
3O
City of Temecula
BUDGET SUMiVIARIES 0 VER VIE IV
The Budget Summaries Section includes a breakdown of revenues and expenditures by funds including General
Fund specifics and City totals. The graphs and summaries presented include the following:
Changes in Fund Balance by Fund 1999-00
General Fund Revenues
General Fund Revenues by Source
Gas Tax Ftmd Revenues by Source
Revenues by Fund - Conunity Services District ,
Revenues by Fund - Redev'elopment Agency
Expenditures by Department - General Fund
Expenditure Summary by Category - General Fund
Expenditure Summary by Category - Community Services District Funds
Expenditure Summary by Category - Internal Service Funds
Expenditure Summary by Category - Redevelopment Agency Funds
Expenditure Summary by Department - General Fund (Four Year Comparison)
Expenditure Summary by Fund - Community Services District (Four Year
Comparison)
Expenditure Sumlnary by Fund - Internal Service Funds (Four .Year Comparison)
Expenditure Summary by Fund - Redevelopment Agency (Four Year Comparison)
Authorized Positions by Department
Summary of Authorized Positions
Personnel Allocation by Department
31
City of Tenwcula
CHANGES IN FUND BitLANCE BY FUND 1~9~-00
Special
Revenue Fund
General Gas Low/Moderate
Fund Tax Housing
Revenues $ 25,640,700
Other Sources:
Operating Transfers In 881,100
Long-term Debt
$ 881,100 $ 1,269,000
Rodevelopment Alency
Redevelop.
$ 113,100 $
1,105,400
Tolal Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures (Appropriations) (1)
Other Uses:
Operating Transfers Out (2)
Exces. s of Revenues and Other Sources Over
(Undcr) Exlymdituras and Other Uses
Fund Balance/Equity, July !, 1999 (3)
Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000
Debt
8errlee
4,806,000
972,570
26,521,800 881,100 1,269,000 1,218,500 5,778,570
(24,776,410) (845,990) (1,019,580) (5, 111,820)
(958,000) (881,100) (1,105,400)
787,390 423,010 198,920 (438,650)
12. ! 78,609 176,990 551,764 1,887,570
12,965,999 600,000 750,684 1,448,920
150,000
216300
98,484
285,900
Designations:
Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies 7,432,923
Conlinuing Appropriation 144.444
Debt Service
Reserves:
Encumbrances 300,000
Land Held for Resale 530,401
Long-term Receivables 3,013,892
Debt Service
600,000
Unreserved Fund Balanc~Equit~
June 30, 2000 $ 1,544,339 $ $ $
(l) Excludes amounts budgeted for capital outlay through the capital improvement program.
(2) General Fund Operating Transfers Out includes a $725,000 transfer to the City's Capital Projecls Fund. The Capital Projects Fund is
presented in the separate capital improvement program budget documenL
(3) Redevelopmenl Agency fund balances at July 1, 1999 do not include amounts committed to the City's capital improvement progrant
1,448,920
32
City of Temecula
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continuea~
Revenues
Other Sources:
Operating Transfers In
Long-term Debt
Tolal Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures (Appropriations)
Other Uses:
Operating Transfers Out
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over
(Under) Ex'pendimres and Other Uses
Fund Balance/Equity, July i, 1999
Fund Balance/Equily, June 30, 2000
Designations:
Economic Uncerlainty/Contingencies
Continuing Appropriations
Debt Service
Reserves:
Encumbrances
Long-term Receivables
Debt Service
Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity,
June 30, 2000
Ifisur~nce
$ 448,910
448,910
(447,910)
1,000
!,404,698
1,405,698
$ 1.405.698 $
Vehicles
149,000
149,000
(12~200)
24,800
247,318
272,118
Internal Service Funds
Information
Systems
$ 988,300 $
233,000
1,221,300
(921,310)
299,990
489,745
789,735
Support
Services
-255,110
255,110
(250,230)
4,880
125,454
130,334
hcilitles
$ 413,950
413,950
(413,950)
53,787
53,787
272.118. $ 789,735 $ 130,334 $ 53,787
33
CRy of Temecula
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continued)
ReV~lln~
Other Sources:
Operating Transfers in
Long-term Debt
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures (Appropriations)
Other Uses:
Operating Transfers Out
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over
(Under) Ex'pcnditures and Other Uses
Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999
Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000
Designations:
Economic Uncertainty/Contingencies
Continuing Appropriation
Debt Service
Reserves:
Encumbrances
Long-term Receivables
Debt Service
Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity,
June 30, 2000
Parks &
Recreathm
$ 4,119,060 $
'$.
4, 119,060
(3,826,650)
(464,670)
Community ~ervices District
Service Service
Level A Level B
297,530 $ 335,700
Service
Level C
59'4,840
297,530 335.700 .59~840
(298,390) (335,700) (630,100)
(172.260) (860) (35,260)
870.380 25.958 10.182 324.917
698, 120 25,098 10, 182 289,657
698,120 25,098 10,182 289,657
$ $ $
34
City of Tetnecula '
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BY FUND 1999-00 (Continuet0
Community Services District
Service Service Debt
Level D Level R Service
2,32;4,410 $ 12,160 $ 35,600
464,670
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures (Appropriations)
Other Uses:
Operating Transfers Out
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources Over
(Under) Expenditures and Other Uses
Fund Balance/Equity, July 1, 1999
Fund Balance/Equity, June 30, 2000'
Designations:
Economic Uncerlainty/Contingencies
Continuing Appropriations
Debt Service
Reserves:
Encumbrances
Long-term Receivables
Debt Service
Unreserved Fund Balance/Equity,
June 30, 2000
2,324,410 12,160 500,270
(2,348,960) ( 17, 160) (500,270)
(24,550) (5,000)
186,793 11~02 529,020
162,243 6,002 529,105
162,243 6,002
$ $
26,415
502,690
35
City of Temecula
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
FY 99-00 GENERAL FUND REVENUES $26,521,800
Reimbursements
Operating Transfers In 6.94%
3.32% "~ L
Investment Interest
Intergovernmental/~/ 3.49%
8.81%
Other
................. ~ /='2.37%
3~:
~:!~!i:~!~!i!~i~ii:~!~i~::!::~::~;i!!i~::::!~::i~:::i~iii~i~ ....p~op~rty T.x
14.2 4 %~ ~ 1 :"' ........... : ~;; ~ ....
i i · ... "' " . .... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~ .?:".'., '~ ': '--:-':'-:'?:F::~::~::::~:~:~??;~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~E:~:~:~:~'FranchiM
r ....
'?rL,". -,r ,' "[~i= ~., ': ~,~ ,n~.Y.l~ 4.94%
Transient OccupancyT~ ~"~ ~_
3.91% ~ -- - ;~
~S~ea Tax
47.08~
FOUR-YEAR COMPARISON
$30 -
$25 -
$20 -
$15 -
$10 -~
.Actual 1996-97
!
A~ual 1997-98
.L
36
City of Temecula
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE
Actual
FY 1996-97
Taxes and Franchises
Property Tax
Franchise Fees
Sales and Use Tax
Property Transfer Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax
1,171,883
998,094
8,774,595
178,449
752,743
Licenses, Permits, and
Service Charges
Business Licenses
Engineering
Building
Planning
Fire Plan Check
and Inspection
150,220
1,094,608
1,415,960
343,591
115,578
Fines and Forfeitures
130,448
Use of Money
Investment Interest
953,382
Intergovernmental Revenues
Motor Vehicle in Lieu
Motor Vehicle License Fees
AB 3229 (COPS)
Grants
!,614,424
33,231
97,393
162,795
Reimbursement from
'Capital Improvement Program
Community Services District
Redevelopment Agency
Other
216,133
162,000
75,000
60,542
Operating Transfers In
Actual
FY 1997-98
Miscellaneous
Total
$ 1,243,402
1,137,484
.'9,186,547
281,700
853,981
163,842
999,237
1,5833327
319,965
196,100
1%,529
1,197,461
1,755,091
51,263
99,245
168,848
222,237
162,000
125,000
25,873
796,905 840,564
104,561 95,949
$ 19,402,335 $ 20,885,745
Estimated
FY 1998-99
$ 1,268,600
1,175,000
I0,400,000
275,000
990,000
175,000
1,200,000
2,100,000
409,000
215,000
251,000
1,100,000
1,900,700
34,000
105,200
45,000
530,000
162,000
125,000
20,000
827,000
127,800
$ 23,435,300
Projected
FY 1999.4M)
$ 1,300,600
1,311,500
12,487,000
295,000
1,036,000
185,000
1,200,000
1,762,500
409,000
220,000
273,000
925,000
2,076,000
51,000
106,000
103,600
1,553,000
162,0~0
125,000
881,100
59,500
$ 26,521,800
37
City of Temecula
GAS TAX FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE
Actual Aetual
FY L996-~/ FY 1997-~
Gas Tax Revenues $ 776,447 $ 788,981
Interest Revenue 15,379 7,784
MisceHam~s 4,605
Total $ 796,431 $ 796,765
$ 821,000 $ 876,600
$ 827,000 $ 881,100
FOUR YEAR COMPARISON
$900
$7OO
$500
Actual 1996-97
Actual 1997-98 Estimated 1998-99
itiGasTaxRevenues]
Projected 1999-00
38
City of Temecula
REVENUES BY FUND - CO,~L~!UNITY SERI/ICES DISTRICT
Actual Actual
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98
Parks and Recreation $ 3,359,968 $ 3,565,438
Service Level A 196,788 222,620
Service Level B 273 ,242 281,122
Service Level C 535,273 586,656
Service LeVel D 1,868,205 2,071,042
Service Level R 19,220 19,354
Debt Service * 36,487 36,010
Total $ 6,289, i 83 $ 6,782,242
Estimated
FY 1998-99
3,632,610
281,800
313,840
591,180
2,277,690
12,880
35,600
7,145,600
* Does not'include operating transfer from Parks and Recreation.
FOUR YEAR COMPARISON
$8,000,000
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
A~ual FY 1996~7 A~ual FY 1997~8
[] Parks and Recreation [] Service Level A
· Service Level D [] Service Level R
Estimated FY 1998-99
[] Service Level B
· Debt Service
Projected
FY 1999-00
$ 4, 119,060
297,530-
335,700
594,840
2,324,410
12,160
35,600
$ 7,719,300
$7,719,300 ]
Projected FY 1999-00
[] Service Level C
39
Ci~ of Temecula
REFENUES BY FUND- REDEFELOPMENT AGENCY
Actual
FY 1996-97
Actual
FY 1997-98
Estimated
FY 1998-99
Projected
FY 1999-00
Low/Moderate
Income Set Aside $ 1,575,790 $
Redevelopment* 738,934
Debt Service 6,360,602
Total $ 8,675,326 $
1,579,372
623,800
5,859,588
8,062,760
$
$
1,336,100
331,000
5,483,200
7,150,300
1,269,000
113,100
5,778,570
7,160,670
*Does not include operating transfers from Debt Service Fund.
I I
$8,675,326 I
FOUR YEAR COMPARISON
$9,000,000
$8,000,000 "
$7,000,000. I['_
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
Actual FY 1996-97
IS8,062,760 I
I$7,150,3(N} I
Actual FY 1997-98
Estimated FY 1998-99
Projected FY 1999-00
II Low/Mod Set Aside [] Redevelopment [] Debt Service I
40
CI'his Page Intentionally Left Blank)
41
City of Temecula
EXPENDITURES BY DEP, IRTMENT- GENERAL FUND
City Council ($693,500)
Non-Departmental
($2, 186,000) '~
Animal Control
($55 000) .......
Police ($6,333,180) ~-~=.'--',.'--2~.
Public Works/
($4.508,160)
City Manager
($1 651 310)
Community
Development
_ -'~" ~ ~ ../($4,575,000)
!ii; ~;~ ~ '~--Fir~($2,795,060)
($1,010,940)
Fiscal Year 1999-00 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES $24,776,410
(excluding operating transfers)
42
City of Tenwcula
EXPENDITURE SU~!~!ARY BY CATEGORY- GENERAL FUND
Department
City Council:
City Council $
Community Support
City Manager:
City Manager
Economic Development
Human Resources
City Allomey
City Clerk
Finance
Community Development:
Planning
Building & Safety
Land Developmen|
Public Works:
Public Works
'CIPAdministration
Police
Fir~
Animal Control
Non-Departmental
Total $
Personnel
69,230 S
426,450
211,570
151,700
367,640
687,430
1,176,770
1,216,650
773,260
964,370
1,365,390
23,730
26,000
7,460,190 $
Openttiom
& Maintenance
219,770
404,500
204,070 $
524,020
131,500
347,500
253,120
323,510
555,370
590,440
226,060
1,96~670
186,130
6,300,450
~769,060
55,000
2,186,000
17.246.170 $
Capi~l
Outlay
2,000
24,000
9,950
2,500
21,100
1,500
9,000
$
70.050 $
opentang
958,000
958,000 $
Toml
289,000
632,520
735,590
283,2000
347,500
620,760
1,010,940
1,756,140
1,81~040
1,001,820
2,955,140
i,553,020
6,333,180
2,795,060
3,144,000
25,734,410
43
C~y of Tm~cula
EXPENDITURE SU,~!MARY BY CATEGORY- CO,II211UNFIT $ERtqCES DISTRICT FUNDS
Operatiom
Fund Personnel & Maintenance
Parks and Recreation* $ 1,578,870 $ 2,219,280 $
Sendco Level A 2,890 295,500
Service Level B 335,700
Sotvice Level C 114,420 515,680
Service Level D 27,440 2,321,520
Service Level R 17,160
Debt Service 500,270
Tolal $ !,723,620 $ 6,205,110 $
Capital
Outlay
28,500 $
28300 $
Ol~ratin~
Transfers
Total
3,826,650
298,390
335,700
630,100
2,348,960
17,160
500,270
7,957.230
* Does not include $464,670 operating transfer ~o lhe Debt Service Fund.
Service Level D
-(52,348,960
.-\
Service Level R
(S13,230)
Debt Service (S500,270)
Parks and Retreation
($3,826,650)
/
Service Level B
(s3so,g4o)
~__Service Level A
($298,390)
44
City of Temtcula
EXPENDITURE .~ U.~II~ IA R Y BY CATEGORY- INTERNAL .,~ ER | q CE FUND.~
Operations
Fund Personnel & Maintenance
lnsuranc~ $ 32,330 $ 415,580
V~icles 124,200
Information Systnns 251.550 669,760
Suppo~ Services 69,930 180,300
Facilities 194.200 192,250 $
Total $ 548.010 $ 1.582.090 $
Capital
Outlay
27,500
27.500 $
operating
$ $
ToM
447,910
124,200
921,310
250,230
413,950
2.157.600
Support Services . /Facilities ($413,950)
· ($250'230) ' "i/;: :::: :: I surance ($447,910)
::
Information Systems/\~''
($921,310)
(124,200)
45
C~ of Tea~cula
F..XPENDITURE SU~I.~!AR Y BY CATEGORY- RED EI"ELOP. IIIENT AGENCY FUND,.~
Operations
Fund Personnel & Maintenance
Low/lvlod~rate
Income Set Aside $ 202,150 $ 643,840
Rodevelopmont 84,430 935,!50
Debt S~rvicc 5,111,820
Total $ 286.580 $ 6.690.810
Capital
Outlay
Opemtin~
Tram fen
$
$ 1, 105,400
$ 1.105.400 $
Tolal
845,990
1,019,580
6,217,220
8.082.790
46
(This Page/ntentionally Left Blank)
47
Cit~ o./' Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMAR Y B Y DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND
Four Year Comparison
CITY COUNCIL
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
Personnel $ 62,674 $ 61,729 $
Operations &Maintenance 179, 168 174,066
Capital Outlay
Total $ 241,842 $ 235,795 $
Program: Community Support
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
69,580 $
208,560
Total
278,140 $
CITY MANAGER
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
69,230
219,770
289,000
Program: Economic Development
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
$ 209,506 $ 169,981 $ 458,923 $ 404,500
Total
$ 209,506 $ 169,981 $ 458,923 $ 404,500
Program: Human Resources
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
374,140 $ 344,485 $
'151,569 158,582
1,080
439,429 $
248,203
426,450
204,070
2,000
$ 525,709 $ 504,147 $ 687,632 $ 632,520
215,450 $
598,067
$ $ $
$ $ $
813,517 $
211;570
524,020
735,590
$ 187,765 $ 184,055 $ 199,830 $ 151,700
115,169 128,919 145,440 131,500
$ 302,934 $ 312,974 $ 345,270 $ 283,200
48
City of Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND (Cont'd)
Four Year Comparison (Continued)
CITY ATTORNEY
' Personnel '
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
$ 402,479 $ '286,034 $ 400,000 $ 347,500
Total
$ 402,479 $ 286,034 $ 400,000 $ 347,500
CITY CLERK
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
295,636 $ 305,580 $
214,299 192,462
1,723
406,650 $
211,131
Total
367,640
253,120
FINANCE
$ 509,935 $ 499,765 $ 617,781 $ 620,760
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Program: Planning
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
Program: Building & Safety
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
504,657 $ 566,809 $ 659,200 $
252,928 240,777 330,874
1,701 3,478
687,430
323,510
$ 757,585 $ 809,287 $ 993,552 $ 1,010,940
685,464 $ 869,209 $ 1,027,220 $ 1,176,770
279,037 409,572 650,549 555,370
2,797 79,794 24,000
$ 964,501 $ 1,281,578 $ 1,757,563 $ 1,756,140
597,319 $ 632,845 $ 860,650 $ 1,216,650
428,295 479,125 532,559 590,440
780 6,750 9,950
$ 1,025,614 $ 1,112,750 $ 1,399,959 $ 1,817,040
49
City of Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND (Cont'd)
Four Year Comparison (Continued)
Program: Land Development
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
Personnel $ 592,251 $ 682,381 $
Operations &Maintenance 155,583 143,757
Capital Outlay 302
Total $ 747,834 $ 826,440 $
PUBLIC WORKS
Personnel $ 449,797 $
Operations &Maintenance 1,266,390
Capital Outlay 33,814
Total $ 1,750,001 $
Program: CIP Administration
Personnel $ 510,159 $
Operations &Maintenance 88,564
Capital Outlay
Total $ 598.723 $
POLICE
- Personnel $
': Operations & Maintenance $ 4,385,095
Capital Outlay 116,615
Total $ 4,501,710 $'
FIRE
Personnel $ 3,202
Operations &Maintenance 1,399,205 $
Capital Outlay 25,600
Total $ 1,428,007 $
575,565 $
1,249,700
46,927
1,872,192 $
455,067 $
98,023
553,090 $
9,977 $
4,946,479
32,808
4,989,264 $
1,451,875 $
483
1,452,358 $
779,370 $
224,350
2,510
1,006,230 $
816,590 $
1,907,943
22,586
2,747,119 $
800,260 $
194,800
9,410
1,004,470 $
45,671 $
5,623,183
9,000
5,677,854 $
2,153,626 $
20,884
2,174,510 $
773,260
226,060
2,500'
1,001,820
964,370
1,969,670
21,100
2,955,140
1,365,390
186,130
1,500
1,553,020
23,730
6,300,450
9,000
6,333,180
2,795,060
2,795,060
50
City of Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT- GENERAL FUND (Cont'd)
Four Year Comparison (Continued)
ANIMAL CONTROL
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Operating Transfers Out
Total
Actual ACtual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
$ 35,699 $ 39,900 $ 55,000 $ 55,000
$ 35,699 $ 39,900 $ 55,000 $ 55,000
$ 880,972 $ 1,186,877 $ 1,470,020 $
3,408,872 7,574,700 7,320,165
$ 4,289,844 $ 8,761,577 $ 8,790,185 $
General Fund Total
$ 18,291,923 $ 23,707,132 $ 29,207,705 $
2; 186,000
958,000
3,144,000
25,734,410
51
Ci~ of Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND - COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Four Year Comparison
PARKS & RECREATIONs
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1998-99
Personnel $ 1,124,006 $ 1,237,077 $ 1,467,120 $
Operations &Maintenance 1,628,368 1,734, 118 2, 134,868
Capital Outlay 22.846 2,759 15,500
Total $ 2,775,220 $ 2,973,954 $ 3,617,488 $
SERVICE LEVEL A
Personnel $ 2,678 $ 2,776 $ 2,850 $
Operations & Maintenance 194,303 208,890 280,368
Capital Outlay
Total $ 196,981 $ 211,666 $ 283,218 $
SERVICE LEVEL B
Personnel $ 6,839 $ 6,839 $ 7,430
Operations &Maintenance 280, 124 292,816 343,410 $
Capital Outlay
Total $ 286.963 $ 299,655 $ 350,840 $
SERVICE LEVEL C
Personnel .$ 113,930 $ 92,441 $ 119,490 $
Operations &Maintenance 440,037 435,837 503,718
Capital Outlay
Total $ 553,967 $ 528,278 $ 623,208 $
1,578,870
2,219,280
28,500
3,826,650
2,890
295,500
298,390
335,700
335,700
114,420.
515,680
630,100
* Does not include operating transfer to the Debt Service Fund.
52
City of Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMAR Y B Y FUND - COMMUNITY' SER VICES DISTRICT
Four Year Comparison (Continued)
SERVICE LEVEL D
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed'
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
$ 43,846 $ 39,736 $ 43,680 $ 27,440
1,754, 111 . 2,080,080 2,234,010 2,321,520
$ 1,797,957 $ 2,119,816 $ 2,277,690 $ 2,348,960
SERVICE LEVEL R
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
$ 9,940 $ 20,931 $ 13,230 $ 17,160
$ 9,940 $ 20,931 $ 13,230 $ 17,160
DEBT SERVICE
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
$ 501,600 $ 500,995 $ 501,980 $ 500,270
$ 501,600 $ 500,995 $ 501,980 $ 500,270
Community ServicesDistTotal- $ 6,122,628 $ 6,655,295 $ 7,667,654 $ 7,957,230
53
City of Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Four Year Comparison
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
INSURANCE FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
Personnel $ 27,984 $ 20,243 $
Operations &Maintenance 452,579 370,727
Capital Outlay
Total $ 480,563 $ 390,970 $
VEHICLES
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
SUPPORT SERVICES
Personnel
OperatiOns & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
FACILITIES
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
31,780 $ 32,330
415,850 415,580
447,630 $ 447,910
$ 46,914 $ 58,791 $ 95,610 $ 124,200
$ 46,914 $ 58,791 $ 95,610 $ 124,200
$ 133,209 $ 139,112 $ 179,690 $ 251,550
486,348 546,931 662,812 669,760
$ 619,557 $ 686,043 $ 842,502 $ 921,310
$ 33,982 $ 34,675 $ 71,500 $ 69,930
171,172 185,178 195,205 180,300
$ 205,154 $ 219,853 $ 266,705 $ 250,230
$ 108.667 $ 135,507 $ 165,120 $ 194,200
244,247 139,293 212,444 192,250
27,306 32,500 27,500
$ 352,914 $ 302,106 $ 410,064 $ 413,950
Internal Senrice Fund Total
$ 1,705,102 $ 1,657,763 $ 2,062,511 $ 2,157,600
54
City of Temecula
EXPENDITURE SUMMAR Y B Y FUND - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Four Year Comparison
LOW/MODERATE
INCOME SET ASIDE
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
REDEVELOPMENT
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outl3y
Total
DEBT SERVICE*
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00
$ 65,777 $ -209,872
309,157 361;816
14,979
$ 374,934 $ 586,667
$ 136,249 $ 219,967
1,136,389 661,349
7,780
$ 1,272,638. $ 889,096
$ 5,237,153 $ 5,120,426
$ 5,237,153 $ 5,120,426
Redevelopment Agency Totals $ 6,884,725 $
6,59~,189
$ 187,270
885,470
$ 1,072,740
$ 90,480
829,246
3,000
$ 922,726
$ 4,899,270
$ 4,899,270
$ 6,894,736
$ 202,150
643,840
$ 845,990
$ 84,430
935,150
$ 1,019,580
$ 5,111,820
$ 5,111,820
$ 6,977,390.
*Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund.
55
City of Temecula
AUTHORIZED POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT
FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 P'Y 1998-99 FY 1999-00
City Council 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
City Manager 7.00 7.50 10.50 10.00
City Clerk 5.50 6.00 6.00 6.00
Finance 9.00 10.00 10.00 11.00
Community Development
Planning 11.10 11.50 12.00 12~00
Building &Safety 10.00 11.00 11.00 16.00
Land Development 10.60 9.90 10.60 9.85
Public Works 14.40 '20.60 23.90 26.40
Community Services 17.75 18.65 19.65 21.90
Internal Service Funds 5.75 5.85 5.85 6.35
Redevelopment Agency 2.90 4.50 3.00 3.00
Total Authorized Positions 99.00 110.50 -117.50 127.50
TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS - 127.5
Cornunity Services. Intemal Service
(21.90) - Funds (6.35)
Public Works (26.40)-X~X .......... ~ l~N .~~City Manager(lO. O0)
!'~..?~ . ~. ~ · .--,-~.-- . ... U. City Council (5.00)
!"~"""'~/' ~"~~ ~ _/-- 'J' City Clerk (6.00)
Community
Development (37.85)
56
City of Temecula
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
CITY COUNCIL
Councilmembers
CITY MANAGER
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant to the City Manager
Senior Management Analyst
Management Analyst
Executive Assistant
Human Resources Specialist
Human Resources Assistant
Marketing Coordinator
Administrative Secretary
Office Specialist
Total
CITY CLERK
City Clerk/Director of Suppen Services
Deputy Director of Support Services
Records Coordinator
Administrative Secretary
Office SpecialiSt
Office Assistant
Total
FINANCE
Director of Finance
Assistant Finance Director
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Accountant
Accountant
Administrative Secretary
Accounting Specialist
Purchasing Specialist
Accounting Assistant
Total
Authorized
1998-99
5.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
10.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
6.0O
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.75
2.50
1.00
1.00
10.00
Changes
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(1.00)
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
(1.00)
(0.50)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
Proposed
1999-00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
LO0
1.00
1.00
1.00.
1.00
1.00
0.00
10.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
.1.00
1.00
6.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.75
2.50
1.00
2.00
11.00
57
City of Temecula
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING
Authorized
1998-99
Deputy City Manager
Planning Manager
Senior Planner
Associate Planner
Development Processing Coordinator
GIS Analyst
Assistant Planner
Community Development Technician
Administrative Secretary
Community Development Aide
Office Assistant
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Changes
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
(2.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Proposed
1999-00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Total 12.00 0.00 12.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING & SAFETY
Chief Building Official
Deputy Building Official
Senior Building Inspector
Plan Checker / Building Inspector
Building Inspector II
Code Enforcement Officer
Community Development Technician
Building Inspector I
Administrative Secretary
Office Specialii;t .
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Total 11.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - LAND DEVELOPMENT
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Deputy Public Works Director
Senior Engineer
Associate Engineer
Permit Engineer
Senior Public Works Inspector
Assistant' Engineer
Public Works Inspector
Community Development Technician
Administrative Secretary
Office Assistant
0.30
0.30
! .00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.75
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(1.00)
0.00
0.25
(0.75)
Total
10.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
16.00
0.30
0.30
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
0.00
0.25
1.00
9.85
58
City of Temecula
PERSONNEL ALLOCM TION BY DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
Director of pUblic Works/City Engineer
Deputy Public Works Director
Senior Engineer
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Associate Engineer
Senior Public Works Inspector
Assistant Engineer
Senior Management Analyst
Managemenl Analyst
Landscape Inspector
Administrative Secretary
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Worker
Office Assistant
Total
General Fund Total
Authorized
1998-99
0.70
0.70
3.00
1.00
0.00
3.00
2.00
· 4.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.75
3.00
3.00
2.25
23.90
89.00
Changes
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
(0.50)
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
(0.25)
2.50
7.25
Proposed
1999-00
0.70
0.70
3.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
2.00
4.00
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.75
3.00
3.00
2.00
26.40
96.25
COMMUNITY SERVICES
PARKS AND RECREATION
DirectOr of Community Services
Deputy Director of Community Services
Maintenance Superintendent
Development Services Administrator
Recreation Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Development Services Analyst
Senior Landscape Inspector
Museum Services Manager
Recreation Supervisor
Administrative Secretary
Recreation Coordinator
Landscape Inspector
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Worker
Office Assistant
Custodian
Total
1.00
1.00
0.70
0.75
1.00
0.95
0.00
0.40
1.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
2.10
1.00
16.90
-0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
(0.25)
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
1.50
0.50
0.20
0.00
2.55
1.00'
1.00
0.70
0.80
1.00
0.70
0.20
0.50
1.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
0.25
1.50
1.50
2.30
1.00
19.45
59
City of Temecula
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION B Y DEPAR TALENT
SERVICE LEVEL A
Development Services Analyst
SERVICE LEVEL B
Development Services Analyst
Office Assistant
Total
SERVICE LEVEL C
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Senior Landscape Inspector
Development Services Analyst
Landscape InspeCtor
Office Assistant
Total
SERVICE LEVEL D
Development Services Administrator
Development Services Analyst
Office Assistant
Total
Community Services Total
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
INSURANCE
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary
Total
Authorized
1998-99
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.15
0.05
0.05
0.60
0.70
0.00
0.25
1.65
0.25
0.15
0.50
0.90
19.65
0.25
0.25
0.50
Changes
0.00
(o. lo)
(0.05)
(o. 15)
0.00
(0.05)
(0.10)
(0.1 O)
0.50
0.05
0.30
(0.05)
0.00
(0.40)
(0.45)
2.25
0.0
0.0
0.0
Propoaed
1999-00
0.05' '
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.30
1.95
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.45'
21.90
0.25
0.25
0.50
6O
City of Temecula
PERSONNEL ALLOCA TI ON B Y DEPARTMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Information Sy.stems Administrator
Information Systems Specialist
Total
SUPPORT SERVICES
Administrative Technician
FACILITIES
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Facilities Coordinator
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Worker
Office Assistant
Total
Internal Service Fund Total
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
LOW/MOD HOUSING
H0using/Redevelopment Manager
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary
Total
CIP/REDEVELOPMENT
Housing/Redevelopment Manager
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary
Total
Redevelopment Agency Total
Authorized
1998-99
1.00
1.00 -
2.00
0,25
0,00
1,00
0,00
1,00
0,10
2,35
5,85
0,75
0,75
0,50
2.00
0,25
0,25
0,50
1,00
3,00
Changes
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,30
0,00
0,50
(0,50)
0,20
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Proposed
1999-00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0,25
0,30
1,00
0,50
0,50
0,30
2,85
6,35
0.75
0.75
0.50
2.00
0,25
0,25
0,50