HomeMy WebLinkAbout071100 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabiltties Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the Ctty Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the Ctty to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Hie II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JULY 11, 2000-7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code
Sections:
1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8 concerning acquiring an interest in real property located at
44501 La Paz Road (APN 922-240-81). The negotiating parties are the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and the Rancho jljieadows
Homeowners. Under negotiation is the affordability covenants. The
Agency/City negotiators are Shawn Nelson, James O'Grady, and John I\~eyer.
2. City Manager's Evaluation.
Public Information concerning ellisting litigation between the City and various parties
may'_~e ~cquir':.~ ~y .~viewi~g the pu.~li.c_~~e~~~~. ~.Y.~~Jt~ Clerl(~. "_'''__
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2000-96
Resolution: No. 2000-55
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Jeff Stone
Prelude Music:
Temecula Valley Youth OrchestralYouth Choir
Invocation:
Pastor George Simmons of House of Praise
Flag Salute:
Councilman Roberts
ROLL CALL:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
PRESENT A TIONS/PROCLAMA TIONS
Certificate of Achievement to former Planninc Commissioner Linda Fahev
Certificates of Achievement to Arrow of Licht recipients from Cub Scout Pack 384
R:\AgendaI071100
Certificate of Achievement to Jeffrey Nicholas Robertson for attainina Eaale Scout
Presentation of Community Economic and Demoaraphic Information by Dr. John Husina
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 27, 2000.
R:\AgendaI071100
2
3 Resolution Approvino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report as of May 31.2000
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2000.
5 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which
provides safety, liquidity, and yield for City funds.
6 Contract Inspection Services for Buildino and Safety
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with P & D Consultants in an
amount not to exceed $60,000 to provide supplemental building inspection services
to the Building and Safety Department.
7 Substitute Aoreements and Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract No. 29510 (located
north of State Route 79 South and west of Maroarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and replacement
securities for Public Improvements in Tract No. 29510;
7.2 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision
Monumentation securities on file;
.
7.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
R:\AgendaI071100
3
8 Authorize Temporary Street Closure for construction purposes (De Portola Road from
Campanula Way to Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURE
FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES IN DE PORTOLA ROAD
FROM CAMPANULA WAY TO MEADOWS PARKWAY AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT
FOR THIS SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION CLOSURE
9 Acceptance of Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for recordation purposes for Rioht-of-Way
Dedication for road purposes for PA99-0205. Conditional Use Permit for a Recreational
Vehicle Storaoe Facility at 44526 Pala Road (located south of Pala Road Bridoe)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
CERTAIN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR
RECORDATION PURPOSES FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD
PURPOSES FOR PA99-0205, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY AT
44526 PALA ROAD (LOCATED SOUTH OF PALA ROAD
BRIDGE)
9.2 Authorize and direct the City Clerk to record the documents approved by the
resolution as listed above.
10 Professional Services Aoreement - Proiect Desion Consultants Pauba Road
Improvements - Phase II - Proiect No. PWOO-09
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the agreement with Project Design Consultants to provide professional
design engineering services for the preparation of plans, specifications, and
estimates to construct Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II - from Showalter
Road to Margarita Road - Project No. PWOO-09 - for the not to exceed amount of
$125,180.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of 10% of the contract or $12,518.00.
R:\AgendaI071100
4
11 Renewal of Annual Street Stripina Contract - Proiect No. PW97-28
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve the second amendment of the Street Striping Contract with Pacific Striping,
Inc. of Whittier for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 for a period of one year beginning July 1,
2000 in an amount of $150,000.00;
11.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $15,000.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
12 Second Readina of Ordinance No. 2000-06 (Prima Facie Speed Limit on certain streets)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMIT ON CERTAIN STREETS
13 Second Readino of Ordinance No. 2000-07 (Council Pay Increase)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.04.050 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING THE SALARY FOR
COUNCILMEMBERS TO FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER
MONTH AS PROVIDED IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
36516 AND PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF
NECESSARY EXPENSES
14 Second Readina of Ordinance No. 2000-08 (City Commission Appointments)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.050 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
APPOINTMENT OF CITY COMMISSIONERS
R:\AgendaI071100
5
*********...........
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
...*******..
R:\AgendaI071100
6
't:!:'l'l"r"'~!:'Itrn~:":'l.~:~mt'r**~; (':t:~.l'Ir.n*r.tlnnlll'l':D*~llI ~ o"l i'rt:'Il':::::nl'l'l':~:t"''' tl'l'llftl'll'l ~ ftn !lcn'1\' ,,~t:* i'I".:II., i'I'f:~Cl:" iD!:'.:II tI iDt:\":t:i'I l'I !~n *trf.lQ'I': iDt:\":"''' t: Q~' t:lItr:::::a1':QQa ':1.::::\,,:a:'l
TErvlECULP. corv'iiviUi\J1TY SERVICES DISTRICT ivlEETING
na'l':'Il'~~~n'l':nl'l'l':r.r.a*r.na*ft"al'l*ftr.Q'l'lIl'Ift"**"ft"r.*~f.l**r.Qa'l':'Il''I':***l'I''''nr,n'l'll'l':"r,o"li'r*t:t::ti'lt::tA*ilIn:t'l':t:Rni'rftRnn'l':llInn'l':llIn"nor.nt:**""Dr.n'll'n'l':n*110:'1
___._.__n ..._.......__.__._.. .'--'-
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2000-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2000-14
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 27, 2000.
2 Chaparral Pool Desian Contract Phase II
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve a Design Services Agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc. in the
amount of $210,094 to complete the second phase of the design process for the
Chaparral High School swimming pool;
2.2 Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $21,010 for the phase II design
of the Chaparral High School swimming pool project.
R:\Agenda1071100
7
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Children's Museum Feasibility Study
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the findings of the Children's Museum Feasibility Study.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next adjourned regular meeting: Tuesday, July 18, 2000, RCIP Workshop at 6:00 P.M., City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\AgendaI071100
8
ftft~Qftft~~ftft~~~~~~~~n~r.~nn~~n~~~ftQ~~~6n~~ftn~~n~nQnnn~~~n~nnnn~nnn~*~n~*nnn~~6ne*nn~~nn~nnnnc~nn~~nn~~nft*.~n~~nnft*
TEi'iiECULA REDEVELOPiviENT AGENCY i~iEETING
******t:c*,*t1-a-tu,,:nec!:'l':l':tu":.'l'::IHltlC1:t:n*,*r.or.j'l*nSH'I':':''*'l':l'll'n'':'l':fB"I-:rnr.:1'I**n**'tinnl'l*nr.:*"'*nnl"l'l'l'ft'l"l:'llf't'l:i'I':':'l":'l"Ii'llInn:'ll'l"l"l':fB"I*t1t1'l":nr.::":';'lItlO\"I:'lInnam"ri'lnc**r.'l':
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2000-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2000-07
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 27, 2000.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next adjourned regular meeting: Tuesday, July 18, 2000, RCIP Workshop at 6:00 P.M., City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\Agenda1071100
9
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15 Award of Contract for Citizen Opinion Survey
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve a contract in the amount of $20,345 to Godbe Research & Analysis to
perform a Citizen Opinion Survey;
15.2 Provide staff with any additional input before consultant begins developing suryey
instrument;
15.3 Appropriate $20,345 (which includes a 10% contingency fund) from the General
Fund Unallocated Reserves.
16 Consideration of "Temecula Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues Sponsorship
Reauest
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Consider the sponsorship request for the "Temecula Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise
to the Blues event and provide direction to staff.
17 FY2000-01 Economic Development Fundina Reauests
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve funding for the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce in the amount of
$140,000;
17.2 Approve funding for the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside
County in the amount of $20,000;
17.3 Approve funding for the Temecula Valley Film Council in the amount of $29,000;
17.4 Approve funding for the Inland Economic Partnership in the amount of $12,701.
18 Consideration of Economic Development Sponsorship ReauestsFY2000-01 Economic
Development Sponsorship Reauests
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Approve funding for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival in the amount of
$35,000;
18.2 Approve funding for the Rod Run for actual City-support costs in the amount up to
$30,000;
18.3 Approve funding for the Frontier Days Rodeo for actual City-support costs in the
amount up to $7,000;
R:\AgendaI071100
10
18.4 Approye funding for the GreatTemecula Tractor Race for actual City-support costs
in the amount up to $14,000.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next adjourned regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, July 18, 2000, RCIP WorkshOp at 6:00
P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\Agenda1071100
11
PROClAMA T~ONS
AND
PRESENT A T~ONS
~
o
.......
1a
e\:l ....-t
'"3 u
u (I)
(I) ~
5<
E-=t~
~ 0
o (j)
.,b1a
....-t u
ut;:::
....-t
1::
(j)
U
o
,..c:::
- ^
"O.!5!
1a 6
- 0
.- 8
u 0
3f-<
0.....
U 0
.0.0
iJiJ
oll
.;3-
..........
o 0
..... <Il
til I::
,..c::: ~
o .-
,.c.1=:
I::U
o
(:;
f-<
~
(l)
~
~
ro
"Q
~
o~
~
"0 ...
1a 5
o >>
8 <Il
.- ...
_ <<l
,..c::: 0
- >>
.8 i:i
...........
o ti
<Il <<l
1::-
o 0
',,= ..d
~ ......
..0 ...
._ 0
.t;:l'+=<
I:: I::
o 0
u 'Vi
, ~.~
~ ~-d
... 0 0
~ U......
o bIl'~
>> I:: U
l-4'- 4)
<B~8:
~_ro
.a p.. >>
,_ d.) ~
_,..c::: <<l
<<l ...... 0
5h 't; 5h
o ... I::
iJ] ~
g8..o
'- QJ {/)
<Il 8 <<l
S ,..c:::
o <<l 0
<Il U
~ <C~
... . 0
0.. I:: <Il
~ .8 "0
<Il 0
o .~ ~
;, 8 .~
.-:= e "'0
~8.g
o bIl
0.. .5
~~
:.EO::
-
o Q)
~-:S
...... ::
o 0
...... bIl
o ::
~ .-
:.=: i::
"0 Q)
_ <Il
~ ::
o .-
~ E
o Q)
~]
"0 ^
0..Q
~:
o
o >>
...... <<l
3"0
o,s
iJ-
,..c:::-
o .~
~.;3
,..c:::til
- 0
.....^ <Il
otil
Q) .-
... U
~~
<Il ::
<Il <<l
0"0
.g 1a
~,..c:::o
:: >>8
_8N
...
o
I
~
iJ
-
U
fa
u^
..J
OUlO
..... +J." 0 ~ ~
a1 ~.cO 0
;:l.iJN :>. ~
...... ..c:: al ctl al
0 k...; ~ ~ ...;
00 alctl:>' U
.-
E ..c:: .cal...; ~
al Ul ;:l al
(J) _Vl > '"::l ~
e 00 ...; . 0
ctlctl..... .iJ
~ .6 .c..... 0 U)
..... u ~
(J) ::3 H..... :>. U
.- 8 ..... ctl U
.g ~..... '0
Iso 0
CI) ~'O.s
C'ij ctl .0
~ gp 8 PiI~"';
~~...;
~ .- ~
"Cl
s:: gp lI1 ~
19 lI1 ctl
~ (Q) .- ~~
l!3 s::
::3 WJ .-
m 19 HS
<&,>> 0 :g'O
,......j .....
(J) ~ ctl :z:~
::s ~ ..c:: ~ H.....
0 i ..... @l) Ja. .....
(]) Vl e.E .....
"Cl ctl
S s:: ~ ._ 00
(]) I ..c::;:j
E-t ~ ~ 00......
@)J s:: 0
.-
lH oG"(j CJ 19 ~
0 ~ ..!!l ::3 s...
>, g ~ ~<
+J ~ e gp ~
..-1 @l) 0"8
u ~ ~ CJ ctl
~ .6 ~
(i(QJ '0 -.::tctl
oG"(j a (ij 00
~ M
~ ~
@)J l! CJ
~ LQQJ If
.....
~ '0 .....
8
.- . .,
.-
g CI)
;::l .0
8 8
.~ ..c::
.....
U .~ 'fe."
"
~ ~ ,"0..(.
.-
0
'-'
-g ~
ctl ~
~ .~
OlllO
... +J -r-! 0 ~
~ ~..c:0 0 ~
;:l+JN :>, ~
..... Q) ltl Q)
0 ~.-t )l .-t
01) Q)ltl~ U
....
...... .c: ..c:Q).-t .
s:: Q) III ;:l Q) !~
E _Vl >.-tl-) ~
gp 0
ltlltl'l-l +J
~ .... ..c:..... 0 Ul
5 u
Q) H..... :>, . U
.... 0 'l-l ltl ril
.c: U . 'l-l '0
U U) r.. 0
10] Ctl ~'Ofj .
.0 . III
~ gp 8 r.l~..-i Q)
i~..-i
~ ....
-0
~ s:: gp fIl~
19 ~ fIlltl
.... ~~
~ s::
5 ....
m Ctl H Ei
rl ~ t:: lE'O
~ I ~ ij') Ctl Z ~
'"'
u ...... .E H.....
Vl @J) 'l-l
Q) S.E 'l-l
-0 ltl
S s:: ~ .... 01)
Q) ~ .c:;,J
E-t ~ ~ 01) .....
@j) 'S 0
4-1 .~ 8 @J) ~ ~
0 ~ Ctl (@J ...~
..... ~
~ lDl ::l
~ ~ 01)
.j..J s:: -
-r-! ~ 0-0
U ~ ~ u ~
ij1 ..... ij') .5 ~
0 ~Ctl
.~ ~ @J) 00
lDl .... ('I")
@j) U ~ ~
~ u
~ If
@2) ...
'0 ...
::l
..... 8
....
u
9 U)
.0
8 8
.~ .c:
...
U .~ .-~~:1;~~. .r"
",.11::,"
~ .5
0
''-'
-0
s::
Ctl ~ '.'-,
OUlO
+J +J'r-! 0 I-l
(I) ~.c:0 0 ~
~ ::I+JN ;:., I-l
..... <Il ell <Il
0 I-l..-l ~ ..-l
.9P <Ilell~ u
+J ...c:: .c:<Il..-l ,
s:: <IlUl,:; <Il ;:.,
E -(I) ~ !~
~ >..-l 0
ell ell"'" +J
~ .- .c:..... 0 Ul
+J U
Q) ;:j H-.... :>, U
.- S ..... ell
...c:: '..... '0
U CI) 1000
"QJ ro ~'O.s
01) .0
~ 8 r-lt::..-l
s:: ~~..-l
qij .-
"0
~ s:: ~ tIl ~
S ~ tIl ell
.- ~~
El s::
;:j (@) .-
m 0 S H a
rl <&J) +J lB'O
~ ~ ro z ~
~ ~ 1-0
0 +J .8. H.....
(I) .....
(]) I "0 81: .....
ell
S c:: ~ ._ 01)
(]) Q) ...c::;.:j
E-i ~ ~ ijJ 01).....
@!) c:: 0
~ .-
4-1 .~ <<i ~
0 u - 0
cij ,,!g Z 1-0
:>1 8 f!ffJJ l!!<
~ 01)
+J E c:: -
-r! (@) S~
u ~ ~
~ '0 ~ .E ~
.~ '<:t
.~ 00
fD) rrl
@ID U ~ ~
~ u
~ If
~ +J
..... +J
0 5
-
.- u
g CI)
8 .0 ---..-.;::;'-
8
a ...c::
.~ . :..'
-,.
. f .'1'
~ ~
.-
0
.~
"Cl .. -
c:: -=
ctl
OUlO
.... -I...J ....-t 0 ~
Ul g,cO 0 .><:
Q) Q)+JN :>, ~
a ..c III Q)
~.-I ~ .-I
OJ) Q)(tj;' u
.-
.... ..c ,c Q).-I ,
s:: Q)Ulg Q) 15
s _Ul C
OJ) >.-1 0
s:: III Ill"'" +J
~ .- ,c OM 0 [J)
.... u ,
Q) ;:l HOM :>.
.- 8 .....Ill
..c '..... '0
U en 1&00
1Q1 eel .0 ~'O.s
~ OJ) 8 ~C.-I
.S ~~.-I
~ "0
s:: ~ OJ) lIlC
;g .S 00 III
~ J1 @J) s:: ~:
::s .-
m ;g H =
c&,>> 0 t ~'O
r--I ....
~ eel z~
;j I 1-0 H'M
0 .... .9. .....
a..> Ul e.E .....
"0 @J) III
S s:: ._ OJ)
a..> ~ (Q) ..c:l
E-i ~ .Era
@Jl ~
4--l .~ 8 'ii1 ~
0 .- 0
~ ..!!:! a 1-0
>t a E!<
~ OJ)
.jJ Q) 1?@ s:: -
.rl e 8~
u ~ ~ o~ .S ~
a\Q1 ...... ~
.~ 0 ~
~
(\J) .- 0 rr'l
@Jl U ~
~ u
~ ~
~ ....
'0 ....
;:l
.- 8
.- ..
u -
~ en
.0
8
~ ..c ...,
-
.... . ".~:;..:' .
0 .~ .;,":-..
~ ~
.-
0
.~
"0
s::
eel
OUlO 10./ ~
+J -.-I 0 0 10./
~..c:0 :>. Q)
.... ::l-l-lN '" ......
CIl Q) ~ U
Q) 10./...... ,
..c: Q)"':>' , :>.
00 ..c:Q)...... Q) -l-l
...... .- Ul ::l ~ 'M
0 ..c: Q) IJ 0 U
.... CIl :>...... -l-l
c::- -00 "''''.... CJ) ,
..c:'M 0 U
Q) c:: u
E .- H'M :>.
.... ....'"
~ ::l '.... '0
0 r..O
Q) CJ o ..c:
.- U) fi!'O-l-l
{j ~ ~...... 0
..0 r-l"'...... IJ
CO 8 !li'O
1Q1 00 c:&!) .
~ s:
~ c:: ~ f/)'" ~
.- 00 f/)..c:
~ "0 s:: ~~ '"
c:: (Q) .-
~ CO s::
.... .- H
~ ~ CO l!l:'O
.... Q)
::l ....
0 CO :;!: ><
H'M
m <&Jl Q) ~ r... ....
42.... ....
r-i ~ ..c: '"
~ .... E-€h
I CIl
U "0 ~ ...... --
0) s:: ..c:~
~ ~'O
s o~
0) ~ .;:: ~
E-t ~ ..!!l 0
@)) 8 ::l r...
DV"iJ ~ ....<
4-l CO ~
0 ~ - 00
::l (Q) s:: -
CJ o"E
:>1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
+J
-..-l ~ ~ .- CO
U ...... ""
~ 0 ~ 00
rt"\
DV"iJ .c;. 11
~ .- o~
U ~
@)) ~ ~
~ ....
... ::l
~ ..... @)) 8
0
- ~ U)
.-
CJ ..0
s:: 8
::l
8 ..c:
.c;. ....
.~
0 ~
Q) .-
E5 0
.~
-g
CO
.-'
'r"
,
0 mo k ..14
+J -,., 0 0 k
C..c::o >. Q)
.... ;:l.j.JN III ..-i
(Il
Q) Q) ~ U
k..-i ,
..c:: Q) III >. , 15
'0 0.0 ..c:: Q)..-i Q)
.- m ;:l c
..c:: Q) ~ 0
.... (Il ~..-i .j.J
c= -0.0 III Ill..... [J) ,
E ..c:: ..... 0
c= u ~
.- H..... >.
....
~ ;j ..... III
0 '..... '0
r.. 0
Q) U 0 ..c::
.-
..c:: tI) ~'O.j.J
U ..0 C..-i 1;
ra1 Ill.....
ctl 8 5'0
CQJ 0.0
c= C
~ tn III
.- 0.0 tn..c::
"0
~ c= c= ~ >.
~ .-
~ ctl c= a ;:l
.... .- H [J)
fl ctl lS'O
@ill ....
;j .... Q)
0 ctl 2; ><
~ H.....
rO ~ Q) 1-0 .....
..Q .....
rl ~ ..c:: ... III
:::1 .... (Q) e ..c::
! (Il 0.0
U "0 ~ .- ;:j
(]) c= ..c::
S ~ 0.0.....
c= 0
(]) .- ~
....
E-I ~ ctl
@>> 8 -
;j 1-0
"irO .... 1-0 '..
4-1 ctl ~ ~ <(
0 ~ - 0.0
;j ,
u c= "0
>, ~ E 8 1-0
~ ~
+J ~ c=
-r-! @ill .- ctl
U ~ ..... '<:t
(ij 0 ~ 00
~
"irO ~ ~ ".
~ 0 (@J u ...., ">.~
If .'
@>> Q)
~ ..c:: ....
.... ;j
@JJ '0 8
- tI)
.-
u ..0
c= o-~.
;j 8 -,:;!.~~ ~1.~~;'::": ,,:
8
..c::
~ ....
.~
0 ~
Q) .- -~ ~..."'- .,
E5 0 . '
'.'
'-'
"0 ., . " ~ -.-
...
c=
ctl .. '~~~":it~~~.~;; ..~;
, .
. '.', ", t.".,~. i':
,~. '.. ~....,
.,","
..
o III 0 ~
-i-J-r-lO ..I<:
..... J::..c::O 0
(I) >. ~
Q) ::l+JN OJ
OJ '"
'0 ..c ~.... - X ....
0.0 OJ"'>. U
.- ..c::OJ....
..... ..c. >.
c:: III ::l f5
_(I) OJ ..,
~ :>....
gp "''''.....
..c:: .r! 0
~ .- u -
.....
;::::l H.r! >.
Q) 8 ..... '"
.- -..... '"d
..c rz.o
() U) ~'"diJ
"'ij ell ..a
0.0 8 ~J::""
~ .8 ~~....
q\Qj "0 (Q) 0.0 II) ~
~ c:: so
ell &JJ c:: 1I)..c::
..... .- ~>. J::
f} c:: '"
~ .- H =
;::::l ell III
m 0 ..... lE'"d
<&Jl .....
rl ~ ~ ell :z;~
;j I ~ H.r!
..... ~ J2. .....
u (I) ..... .....
Q) "0 S..c '"
S c:: (ij ._ 0.0
~ ..c;.:j
Q) ~ ~ 0.0.....
E-i c:: 0
@!) .-
8 ..... ~
4-1 .~ .!9 0
0 ~ .,!g ~ z~
8 ~
>, @ID 0.0
.j..J ~ ~ c:: ~
~ 0'E
-..-f () ell
U ~ ~ ~ .8 ~
~ ..... "",ell
0
.~ ~ ~ 00
("t')
lDl 0 ~ 1j
@!)
Q) rf
~ ..c
.....
~ '0 :;
- 8
.-
() U)
5 ..a
8 8
.~ ..c
.....
U .~
~ ~
.-
0
........
"0
c::
ell
, .
,
rO
M
;:j
U
(])
S
(])
E-l
4-1
o
>t
..j...J
'r-!
U
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
@D
.~
'3
~
~
rij
.~
\\J)
@D
~
~
.....
o
~
c::
8
~
Cl)
.-
..c::
u
(lj
gp
.-
"0
c::
S
El
:::l
o
~
~
.@
c::
~
o
u
(lj
-
:::l
u
Cl)
E
~
.....
o
a
.-
u
~
'0
-
.-
j
a
~
~
~
ijJ
~
(Q)
~
~
(Q)
(?@
c~
~
ijJ
~
~
(/)
~
OIl
.-
..c::.
-(/)
gp
.-
....
:::l
8
U)
.0
8
gp
.-
c::
.-
S
....
(lj
s...
..8.
~
.s~
..c::;:J
OIl.....
c:: 0
.-
~ ~
~ I;
e:!.q;
OIl
c:: -
"0
8 s...
.8 ~
~
("t'\
~
u
tf
....
:::l
8
U)
..0
8
..c::
.~
~
.-
o
.-
-g
(lj
o III 0
+J oM 0
~..c:o
;:l+JN
W
......... -
Will>'
..c:W......
W III ;:l
:>......'"
III Ill"'"
..c:'M 0
u
H'M >.
..... III
-..... '0
r.. 0
~'OfJ
r&I~"'"
$~"'"
fIl~
fIllll
~~
HS
~'O
z~
H'M
.....
.....
III
...
o
>.
III
~
~
...
W
......
u
>.
+J
i~
-
W
~
o
+J
Ul
III
W
~
o
1~
III
::.,'
. .
-
--...---
<: .;'~~J7;~~.:.;;'
'.;' ~.
~.
~
~
......-...,
h~) ...
~., ~~.': ~~'-; ,
10.,'_"
,'r'-'-
. . .~ '?"'~~~~1:'
m
r-l
::s
u
Q)
S
Q)
E-i
4-1
o
>,
.w
-r-!
u
"'ij
~
~
~
o&J)
I
~
@
.~
~
~
~
(iij
.~
~
@
~
@JJ
......
o
....
s::
~
~
Q)
.....
..c
u
III
on
s::
.....
"0
s::
S
~
g
~
....
(Il
"0
s::
i
..sl
;::l
u
~
~
......
o
.~
o
~
....
.....
o
......
.....
@
8
~
.....
u
~
~
fl0J
~
(Q)
~
~
ijJ
~
~
ijJ
~
(Q)
Di
....
(Il
~
on
.....
..c
(Il
-gp
.....
....
g
u
V,)
.0
8
gp
.....
s::
.....
S
....
III
!-.
cEo
c:::.E
.5 on
..c;:J
gp'Q
.....
C;; ~
...... 0
Z t:
~<
gp ~
"0
8 ~
.6 ~
",Ill
00
M
11
~
:i
8
V,)
.0
8
..c
....
':i
~
.....
o
.......
"0
s::
III
o III 0
+J." 0
c..c:o
;:l.j.JN
Q)
14.-1
Q)"'~
..c:Q).-I
Q) III ;:l
:>.-1'""
"''''.....
..c:.,-i 0
u
H-,-i >.
...ttj nj
r..o'O
~'O,s
ralC..-i
S1~..-i
f/) C
f/) '"
~~
H l'i
~'O
:z: ~
H-,-i
.....
.....
'"
14
o
:>.
'"
~
..I<:
14
Q)
.-I
U
:>.
l~
u
~--=; -
-...-.,
~ ~-:":'._":_"'~' ;,.-:
. ..---j".
.~ .-
.- ,'-
-.-";,-" . .
OfllO 104
-IJ.,.,O -'<:
..... Q..c:O 0
III ;j-iJN >. 104
~ Q) III Q)
- 104...... , ): ......
0 00 Q)1ll>. U
.- ..c: Q)......
..... ..c:: >.
s:: fIl ;j ~~
E _Ill Q) t-:l
gp >......
Illlll'l-l
..c:..... 0
~ .- U
.....
::l H..... >. U
0 'I-l III
.- ''I-l'd
..c:: () r.. 0
() tI) ~'d..c:
C'ij ~ .0 Q~
~ 00 8 Will...... 0
s:: O~ i'd t-:l
.-
q\Q) "0 m Q j~
~ s:: ~ 00 mil
!9 s::
.- ~>.
~ s::
.- III
;::l !9 H S
rtl -&J) 0 @!) ..... ii:'d
rl ~ ~ Z ~
~ i ~ I-< H.....
0 ..... .2. 'I-l
III 'I-l
(l) "0 ~ 8.E III
S s:: ._ 00
(l) ~ ~ ..c::;.:l
~ 00-
E-! s:: 0
@)) .-
0 ~ ~
4-l '~ () - 0
0 i1 .S! a~
:>t ;::l c:Q::J) ~
~ () 00
.j...J E c:Q::J) s:: ~
-rI 0"'8
~ @!) () rcl
U ~ .S ~
UiQJ '0 ~ -.::t~
o~ ~ 00
lD) ("I")
.- ~
U
@)) ~ (ij ()
~ ~
..... ~
~ - .....
0 8
-
.-
g tI)
8 .0 ----"'"
8
~ ..c::
.- .~ _ >:~:'J[:;',
U
~ ~
.-
0
.~
"0
s::
~
">f'.
". :..
... ,.!.-"
...~.,
_..~.. ,," 1;, - ,
0000 10-<
.j.J'M 0 ..I<:
.... 1':"<::0 0
CIl >. 10-<
Q) ;::l.j.JN al
al III
..... .c Io-<.--f . ~ .--f
0 OIl allll>' U
..... "<::al.--f .
.... .c al >.
c:: _CIl al 00 ;::l I': f~
E :>.--f'" 0
OIl III Ill"'" .j.J
c:: "<::'M 0 rn
~ ..... u
.... u
::l H'M >. .
Q) 0 .....Ill iii U
..... ...... 'd
.c U r..o >.
U CI) ~'d:S al .
10-< .00
~ CO .0 ..... al
gp 8 r&l1':.-i .....
~~.-i al 0
..... '" '"
m "0 OIl lI) I': J~
c:: lI) III .
CO c:: ~~ vv
~ .... .....
l!l c::
~ ..... .... =
::l 5 00
m ~ 0 .... lB'd rn
r-i ~ ca z~
::s ~ "'" .....M
.... .E. .....
u I CIl .....
.... III
(]) "0 s.c
8 s::: ..... OIl
Q) .c;:J
(]) ~ ~ OIl.....
E--i s::: 0
@Jl 'a ~
4-l .~ u .Sl 0
0 ~ .Sl c:GJ ::l "'"
.... "'"
::l ~<
>. u ~ OIl
.jJ ~ E s::: .
0"2
-r1 @D u ca
U ~ ~ &=D .S ~
(ij ..... ~ca
0
.~ 0 ill9J 00
~
\D) ..... .!ol:
@Jl U u
~ ~ ~
....
~ '0 ....
::l
8 . -
- -- -
'0 CI)
s::: .0
8 8
0 .c " .'
..... .~
U . ..
~ .s
0
.~ ~
"0
s:::
ca
. -.I~ '
~ \ '
"'tS .
l...--
~
~
~
e
~ .....
~ ~
~ ~
~ .~
'-~
sC\
\j-
~ .~
r:: ~
\""" .~
~
~
~
~
l::s'-.:..:
- I:l
;:: ....
~ l::
!:: '"
~ ~
"-~
I:l-<::
.E'~
\j ~
'" .:::
-<::'"1:::l
,::: l::
I:l ~
':::::- ~
'" ;::
l:: I:l
;:: '"
~~
.E'
\j
'"
~
:.:::
~
~
~
~
~
t.D')
~
~
<
.\.J
~
~
~
~
8
~
~
I:l
~
~
~
'"
.:::
~
~
l::s
~
~
\1)
~
~
I<.J
"-
I:l
-<
~
'"
~
~
.:::
.F:
'"
~
...
l::
I:l
~
-<::
~
.:::
....
~
E:
l::s
/5,
l::
~
.:::
~
~
~
~
'"
...
E:
i:
i~
~"3
-<::"
.....
~ .....
O::S'~
-<:: ...
.....-
L' ~
C)'::
~~
~l
V)"':s
V) l::
~~C)
::.~
l:: "J
~~ ~
r"'"><:-
~:t:~
_o::s\;
.~
-<::
.:::
t
..::!
"-
I:l
....
~
-t>
'"
~
~
-<::
-<::
.'"
~
~
"'1::s
l::
l::s
"I:i
...
~
1'1\
ole
~
~
~
~
.....,
....
~
~
...
l:l...
~
'"1:::l
~
~
.::::
~
~
l::s
.~
...
~
~
"
l::
~
V)
\.J
.!
~
~
~
\j
~
\j
~
G
~
l::
.Q.
~
l::
~
Ji
"
CITY OF TEMECULA
cnv MA~AGIE~'S (QJIFIF~CIE
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Managerr
July 3, 2000
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Presentation by Dr. John Husing
Earlier this year, the City retained Dr. John Husing to prepare a "Community Profile".
This is an expansion of, and update to a similar study that Dr. Husing prepared
approximately three years ago. This report provides information that is routinely used
in our economic development programs and other studies.
Dr. Husing has just completed this effort, and attached is a copy of his report. Dr.
Husing will make a brief oral report of this material at your July 11 meeting and will
be available to answer questions as well. Following presentation of the report to you,
this information will be posted on the City's web site as well.
R:\OgrwIyj\&lononUc DcvciopmcDtlHusin& Co.mcil Lport, July II, 2OOO.cilX'
o
CCnlry ([])ll 1r~mm~~lliln21
]J) IE M C(])((; RAJIDlHIJI <C 9 IE<Cc(]) N C(]) MJI <C
&, Q1UAlLJI1rY C(])JF lLJIJFIE ]J)A1rA
o
Compiled By
John E. Husing, Ph.D.
June 19, 2000
IE\\:OImomn\\:s .& lP'oRnttn\\:s, ITIm\\:.
o
3142 Cactus Circle
Highland, CA 92346-1739
(909) 425-8952 Phone
(909) 425-0601 Fax
john@johnhusing.com
www.johnhusing.com
O~I
o CTI'II'Y ((]) JF 'II'IEMIEC1IJILA
ID!EM ((])G~JPlliITI C 9 IEC((]) N ((]) MTI C9
CQ 1IJ AILTI'II'Y ((]) JF ILTIJF!E IDA 'II' A
'II' AlBSILIE ((])JF C((])N'II'IEN'II'S
o
o
'if@J~@(f~
00llliKl ~ @=@
1l0~ lMvXIJ
~ ID- o 0 .olii1l@@ 1l<f2
~~ MJ
I
~o - ~~
@., 1j'@EOO;) ~ Ij'~ ~
@o [l:nxg)~ ~o ~ iOO=@ll
'fl 0 @JJ:ID(OO,vJ <W ~ ~~
@., ~ l"'lnnmutOl [iYi}OOr~~'M9~{O) ~'fl@
Index
CityofTemecula .
June 19, 2000
o
o
o
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
I
O~ @fJ lm[}u~[Q)tlf@ ,
CJI1fY ((]) IF 1fJEMJEC1UILA
lExllnilOfi.ts
No.
Descriotion
'1Jo~
~ ID . 0 0 . 0
Population, 1990'2000
Population Growth Rates, Annual
Population Growth, 1990~2000
Population Growth Rates, 1990-2000
HouseholdIncome Distribution, 1999
Total City Income, 1999
Income Distribution, 1999
Income Distribution, 1999
Educational Attainment, 1990
Population Attended College, 1990
Ethnic Distribution, 1999
EthnicDistribution, 1999 0
~~~
Existing Home Sales, 1988-1999
Existing Home Sales, Quarterly, 1988-1999
Existing Home Sales Growth Rates, 1998-1999
Existing Home Sales Growth Rates, 1988-1999
New Home Sales, 1988-1999
New Home Sales, Quarterly, 1988-1999
New Home Sales, Number of Units, 1998-1999
New Home Sales Growth Rates,l988-1999
Existing Home Prices, Quarterly, 1988-1999
Existing Home Prices, Quarterly, 1988-1999
Existing Home Price Changes, 1998-1999
Existing Home Price Comparison, 1999
New Home Prices, Quarterly, 1988-1999
New Home'Prices, Quarterly, 1988-1999
NewHome.Price Changes, 1998-1999
New Home Price Comparison, 1999
Temecula Home Price Advantage, 1999
Apartment Vacancy & Rental Rates, 4th Qtr 1999
Types & Number of Dwelling Units, 1990-2000
Dwelling Unit Types, Occupancy, Density, 1999
Residential Vacancy Rate, 2000
Population Per Occupied Dwelling Unit, 2000
Percent of Single Family Units Sold, Latest 4-Qtrs
Single FamilyResidentiaFpermits, 1990-2000
I
II
,I
Detail
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
o . O' !MvJttl
'jj'~~ .~
Table, Terriecula & RiversideCouriiY Areas
Chart, City ofTemecula, 1990-2000
Chart, Inland Empire Cities, Top 20
Chart, Inland Empire Cities of 50,000 or More
Table, Temecula & Riverside County Areas
Chart, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000 Population
Pie Chart, T emecula
Pie Chart, Riverside County
Table, Temecula & So. California Counties
Chart, Temecula & So. California Counties
Table, Temecula & Inland Empirc Counties.
Pie Chart, Temecula
.Q}f~
41
o 0
'jj'~~~1
Chart, Temecula
Table, Temecula
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Temecula
Chart, Temecula
Table, Temecula
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Temecula
Graph, Temecula
Table, Temecula
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
'Graph, Temecula
Table, Temecula
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Median Prices vs. So. Calif. Counties
Inland Empire Sub-Markets
Graph, Temecula
Table, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Graph, Inland Empire Cities Over 100,000
Table, Temecula& Inland Emoire Counties
'jj'~~ .rw~
37 EmploymenfTrend, AnnuaLAverage 1991-1999
38 Employment By Sector, 1991-1999
39 Employment Gains, Sector, 1991-1999
40 Employment & Population Growth, 1991-1999
41 Employment Distribution By Sector, 1999
42 EmploymentDistribution By Sector, 1991
43 Payroll Growth In Local Outlets, 1991-1999
44 Payroll Growth After Inflation, 1991-1999
Graph, Temecula
Table, Temecula
Graph, Temecula
Graph, Temecula & Inland Empire
Pie Chart, Temecula
Pie Chart, Temecula
Chart, Temecula
Graph, Temecula
Exhibit List
Page a
O[jiJ~ @J ~GilB~ ,
CCIT1fY ([J)IF 1fJEMJECClUILA
lExlb1filbfits
o
o
No. Deserio!ion Detail
45 PaYrolFBy Sector, 1991-1999 Table, Temecula
46 Payroll Gain By Sector, 1991-1999 Chart, Temecula
47 Payroll Per Worker, 1991-1999 ,Chart, Temecula
48 payrolLPer Worker After Inflation, 1991-1999 . Graph, Temecula
49 Payroll Per Wo*er By Sector, 1991-1999 Table, Temecula
50 Average Payroll' Per Worker By Sector, 1999 Chart, T emecula
51 Number of Firms, 1991-1999 Chart, T emecula
52 Firms By Sector, 1991-1999 Table, Temecula
53 Growth,ln Firms, By Sector, 1991-1999 Graph, Temecula
54 Distribution ofFirms By Sector, 1999 Pie Chart, Temecula
55 Average Size of Firms, 1991.1999 Chart, Temecula
56 Number Workers Per Firm, by Sector, 1991-1999 Table, Temecula
57 Employment of Residents, By Sector, 1998 Chart, Temecula
58 Work~s,bv9ccuoation Type, 1990 Table, Temecula
I @.,~~ 'jj'~ &!J ~ '/~
I: .
59 Total TaxablecSales, 1991-1999 Graph, Temecula
60 Taxable Sales Growth Rates, 1992-1999 Graph, Temecula & Riverside County
61 Total Taxable Sales, Comparison, 1998 Graph, Inland Empire Cities over 100,000
62 Taxable Sales Per Capita, 1991-1998 Graph, Temecula & Riverside County
63 Taxable Sales Per Capita, 1990-1998 Table, Inland Empire Cities over 100,000
64 Taxable Sales 'Per Capita, 1998 Graph, Inland"Empire Cities over 100,000
65 TaxableBales Growth By Sector, 1991-1998 Table, Temecula
66 Taxable Sales Growth By Sector, 1991-1998 Graph, Temecula
67 Taxable Sales by Sector, 1991 Pie Chart, Temecula
68 Taxable Sales by Sector, 1998 Pie Chart, Temecula
69 Sales Per Outlet, By Sector, 1998 Table, Temecula & Inland Empire Counties
70 Total Sales Per Outlet, 1998 Graph, Temecula & Inland Empire Counties
71 Taxable Sales Per Capita, By Sector, 1998 Table, Temecula & Inland Empire Counties
72 TaxableBales PerCaoita Gao. Bv Sector, 1998 Granh Temecula vs. Riverside Countv
I @.,~~~ 'jj'~&!J ~
. ,
73 TofuFlndustria1 Space Absorbed, 1992-1999 Gniph, Inland Empire (Running 4-Qtrs.)
74 Total Industrial Space, By Market, 1999 Graph, Temecula & Inland Empire Markets
75 TotalIndustrial Space, 1990-1999 Graph, Temecula
76 IndustrialcSites AvailablebyBize Ranges, 2000 Table, Temecula
77 Industrial Space Availability, Square Feet, 1999 Graph, Temecula & Inland Empire Markets
78 Industrial Space Availability Rates, 1999 Graph, Temecula& Inland"Empire Markets
79 Lease Rates, Industrial Space, Per Foot, 1999 Graph, Temecula vs. So. California Markets
80 Industrial Space Cost Per Foot, 1999 Graph, Temecula & Inland Empire Markets
81 Industrial Space Cost Per Foot, By Size, 2000 Graph, Temecula, 2000
82 Major Firms Buying Space, Number & Jobs Graph, Temecula & Inland Empire 1994-2000
83 Expanding Firms By Type, 1994-2000 Table, Temecula
84 ExoandingJ'irms BvName, 1,994-2000 Table, Temecula
7/0 @:!ffiJlmiv7 @'I ~ 'jj'~&!J .r\'/~
85 District Enrollment, 2000 Graph, Riverside County 12 Largest Districts
86 Percent, White & Hispanic Students, 2000 Graph, Riverside County LargestDistricts
87 Percent, Black & Asian'Students Graph, Riverside County Largest Districts
88 High School Completion Rates, 1998 Graph, Riverside County Selected High Schools
89 DC & CSUEligible Course Completion, 1998 Graph, Riverside County Largest Districts
90 SAT Total Score, 1999 Graph, Riverside County SelecteqHigh Schools
o
Exhibit List
Page b
o
o
o
No.
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
.106
O~~ @if ~[(ua[Q)tl@ I
CCJI1rY ((]) IF 1rJEMJECC1IJILA
107
108
109
HO
IH
112
113
114
115
116
117
H8
119
120
121
122
123
124
Descrintion
Mean Score, By Subject, Stilhford"9;S"'Gnide
Mean Score, by Subject, Stanford-9, 5'" Grade
Mean Score, By Subject, Stanford-9, 10'h Grade
Mean Score, By Subject, Stanford"9, 10'" Grade
Higher Education Enrollment,.By Campus, 2000
Higher Education.Enrollment, By Type, 2000
Developed Parks, 2000
Wineries, 2000
Major Crimes, Per 1,000 People, 1993-1999
Declining Crime Rate, By Type, 1993"1999
Violent Crime.Per 1,000 People, 1993-1999
Property Crime Per 1,000 People, 1993" 1999
Major Crime Per I ,000 People, 1999
MajorCrime, By Type, 1999
Violent Crime Ped,OOOPeople, 1999
Propertv Crime Per 1 OOO,PeoDle, 1999
n ~-
ffio~ 0 -III. - 0 - -
Ten Flistest GrowingCA Counties, 2000-2010
Population, 1980-2000 actual, 2000-2010 forecast
Total Population, Inland Empire As State, 1998
Personallncome, Inland Empire As State, 1997
Inland'Empire Job Growth, 1983-2000
SouthemCalifornia Job Growth, 1983-2000
Employment Change, By Area, 1990-2000
Annual Employment Change, 1984"2000
Inland Empire Housing Costs.Advantage. 2000
Industrial & Commercial' Lease Costs, 1999
Average Labor Cost Savings, 1998
Wage Rates In Selected' Occupations, 1998
Intennodal Rail Container Lifts, 1986-1999
Regional Trucking Cargo Centers, 2000
Air Cargo Tonnage, 1990"2000
Passenger Traffic, 1990"2000
Consumer Price Index, 1989-2000
Total Building!Permit Valuation, 1.990-1999
Exhibit List
ExllnftlOftts
Detail
Table, Riverside County Urban Districts
Graph, Temecula & California
Table, Riverside County, Urban High Schools
Graph, Temecula & California.
Table, Inland Empire
Pie Chart, Inland Empire
Table, Temecula
Table, Temecula
Graph, Temecula
Table, Temecula
Graph, Temecula
Graph, Temecula
Graph, InlandEmpire Cities over 100,000
Table, Inland Empire Cities over 100,000
Graph, Inland Empire Cities over 100,000
GraDh, Inland EmDire Cities Dver 100,000
1I~~ .Ii'/~
Table; Ca.lifornia
Graph, Inland Empire
Graph, Inland Empire & U.S. States
Graph, Inlimd Empire & U,S. States
Graph, Inland Empire
Graph, 6-Major So. California Counties
Graph, Southern California Counties
Graph, Inland Empire
Graph, LE. vs. Southern California Counties
Table, LE. vs. So. California Coastal Counties
Graph, LE. vs. Other West Coast Areas
Table,lnland,Empire
Graph, Burlington Northern Santa Fe RR, San BOOo.
. Table, Inland Empire
,.Graph, Ontario International Airport
Graph, Ontario International Airport
Graph, Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside vs. U.S.
Graph, Inland Emnire
II
Page c
o
o
o
O~(!!]@illj@[Ji) I
CII1fY (Q) JF 1fJEMJEClUILA
~JEC1fII (Q) N JI.
IIN1fffi. (Q)]J) lU C1fII (Q) N
As Southern California's economy moves deeper into the expansion phase of its business cycle,
Temecula is emerging as one of the most prosperous new communities in the region. A variety
of factors are behind this. Geography is playing a role as the city is receiving growth impulses
both up the 1-15 from San Diego County and down from Orange County. Also, a mountain gap
that allows ocean breezes to flow into the city provides a moderate climate by inland standards
and has permitted the development of sophisticated wineries. Attitude is important as Temec-
ula's leadership has always approached economic growth from a qualitative standpoint, provid-
ing the city with a disproportionate share of the Inland Empire's higher paying and high technol-
ogy firms. Environmental and residential factors have come into playas Temecula rests in a
beautiful setting that is luring relatively young, well-educated families to upscale homes that are
inexpensive by Southern California standards. The city's average income levels are thus higher
than the surrounding region, the educational performance of its young people is above state aver-
ages, and it is one of Southern California's safest cities.
These statements flow from a review of hard demographic, economic and quality of life data
about Temecula. Those data are discussed below.
Section 2.-Demol!raohics. From 1990-2000, Temecula grew from 27,099 people to 53,791, a
gain of 26,692 people or 98.5%, the second fastest among inland area cities with over 50,000
people behind Chino Hills. In this period, Riverside County was California's fastest growing
major county, adding 302,894 people, a gain of 30.1 %. In January 2000, Temecula was River-
side County's fifth largest city. Its rapid growth continued throughout the decade with the rate at
10.2% in 1999-2000.
Temecula is succeeding partly because Southern California's coastal counties are running out of
land and the city offers families the chance to acquire homes in a beautiful setting at reasonable
prices. As a result, many professionals and younger families are migrating to it from San Diego
and Orange counties. The city's 1999 median family income was estimated at $60,212 and its
average household income was a very strong $73,695. Altogether, Temecula's total personal
income reached $1.22 billion, not far behind the total personal incomes of cities like Moreno
Valley and San Bernardino with much larger populations. It is thus no surprise to find that the
largest percentage of the city's families, 32.2%, were in the $45,000-$74,999 bracket and 25.8%
were over $100,000.
Temecula began the 1990s with a well-educated population, and its population trends and school
performance figures have allowed it to maintain that position. In 1990, 63.0% of the city's resi-
Section 1
City of Temecula
Pagei
o
I O~(ill@@@(li) \
dents had at least attended college above the 47.6% to 61.1% range for Riverside, San Diego,
Orange, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles counties.
Though Temecula is an ethnically diverse community, it is much less so than surrounding coun-
ties. In 1999, it is estimated that 77.2% of the city's residents were White (downfrom 80.7% in
1990 but much higher than the rate of Riverside County of 60.1%). Meanwhile, 17.2% of city
residents classified themselves culturally as Hispanic, (up from 14.5% in 1990, and much less
than the county's 25.9%). Only 3.9% of Temecula residents were estimated to be Asian, which
was below the 5%-6% for Inland Empire or 9.4% of San Diego County. And, Blacks were esti-
mated at just 1.7% of the city's population, a low percent for a Southern California community.
Section 3. -Residential. As Temecula enters the 21st Century, it is poised to remain one of the
fastest growing and most prosperous communities in the Inland Empire. From 1990-2000, the
city's housing stock grew by 7,875 (up 73.9% with all but 716 of the city's new units being sin-
glefamily homes). In 1999 alone, 20.2% of the city's housing stock turned over, making it the
most active market in the inland region. Looking ahead, builders took out 1,275 permits for new
single family homes in Temecula during 1999 (10.0% of/he permits issued in Riverside County).
Looking at the city's home sales history, the existing market peaked at 774 units in 1989, before
diving to just 446 in 1990 as Southern California's recession began. Subsequently, sales acceler-
ated to records of 1,432 units in 1998 and 1,505 in 1999. Its 5.1% gain in 1999 was the region's
third fastest behind Corona (9.6%) and Fontana (5.9%). In the new home market, Temecula's
sales also peaked in 1989 at 866 units before plunging to 250 in 1990-1991. Despite the reces-
sion, a record was set at 1,132 units in 1994. Sales then settled into a range of 900-1,050 units
from 1995-1998 before surging to a new high of 1,219 in 1999. The city's 1999 sales were the
Inland Empire's third highest behind Corona (1,569) and Fontana (1,434).
On the price front, Temecula's fourth quarter 1999 median existing home price was $174,088
(up 10.6% from 1998). Since the 1996 recession low of $133,584, the city's prices have re-
bounded 30.8%. However, they remain 10.1% below the 1990 record of$194,388. On a South-
ern California basis, Temecula's existing homes remain a bargain. The 1999 median price was
$13,000 to $89,000 below Los Angeles County ($187,000), San Diego ($215,000), Ventura
($237,000) and Orange ($263,000) counties.
Temecula's new homes traded at a median price of $206,729 in fourth quarter 1999 and are near-
ing the 1990 record of $215,286. Since the 1993 low of $130,547, the city's prices have risen
58.4%. On a Southland basis, there is little wonder why the city is attracting new home buyers.
Its fourth quarter 1999 median price was $73,000 to $140,000 below Los Angeles ($280,000),
San Diego ($288,000), Ventura ($338,500) and Orange ($347,000) counties.
Multi-tenant units represent 19.2% of Temecula's housing stock, the second lowest level for a
major Inland Empire market behind Moreno Valley (12.9%). In 1999, the apartment vacancy
rate was an almost non-existent (1.8% with an average monthly rental rate of $750 in 1999).
The average rent ranked fifth in the inland region behind four areas close to the Orange and Los
Angeles county lines.
Section 4.-Emolovment. Temecula's emergence as a center of job growth is primarily the result
of the migration of firms and people to the Inland Empire from the Southland's coastal counties.
This migration is occurring as the density of land development in San Diego, Orange, and Los
Angeles counties has created a shortage of manufacturing and housing space, and increased
space costs. Temecula is unique in three ways. The major impetus for the growth is coming
north out of San Diego County not from Orange or Los Angeles counties. Firms have leap-
o
o
Section 1
City of Temecula
Pageii
o
o
o
O~~@(Jj) I
The jobs coming to the
I
frogged many miles of undeveloped land to locate within its borders.
city are better paying than the Inland Empire average.
From 1991-1999, Temecula's employment rose from 13,570 to 25,140 (up JI,570 jobs or
85.3%). In 1999 alone, the city's firms and agencies added 13.4% more workers (far above the
Inland Empire's aggressive 5.7% rate). The city's economy has begun to specialize. Retail
trade added the most jobs (2,551) due to the city's expanding population base. This did not in-
clude any jobs created by the opening of Promenade Mall late in the year. Manufacturing ranked
second, adding 2,449 positions. The hotel & amusement industry was third with 1,469 new jobs
due to the growth of the Pechanga Entertainment Center, and tourist visits to the wineries, Old
Town and annual events like the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. By 1999, Temec-
ula's largest sector was manufacturing with 5,863 jobs, followed by retail trade with 5,379.
The payroll expended by Temecula's firms followed a similar but more aggressive pattern to
employment. In 1991, city payrolls totaled $311 million. By 1999, they were at $785 million (a
$475 million gain or 153%). Adjusting for a 17.5% rise in Southern California's consumer
prices, the purchasing power of these payrolls was up $421 million or 136%. The city's payroll
increase was dominated by manufacturing (up $222 million or 46.6% of the total increase).
Next came retail trade, up $54 million, and education, up $43 million. By 1999, Temecula's
largest payroll was in manufacturing. At $3.3 billion, it represented 41.6% of the city's total
payroll and was 3.4 times the $963 million payroll in the next highest sector... retailing.
How much do Temecula's workers make? In 1991, average pay per worker was $22,885. In
1991, that rose by 36.5% to $31,242. The 1999 level was very high for the Inland Empire. For
instance, the City of Riverside's average was $28,212, much more typical of the area. When the
17.5% increase in Southern California prices is deducted from Temecula's $8,357 gain in aver-
age pay, a typical city worker ended up being $4,364 better off from 1991-1999.
Within the sectors, Temecula's manufacturing and utility sectors averaged $55,682, much more
than the mid-$30,000 range for most inland communities This is the result of the concentration
of biotechnology, medical and computer chip firms in the city. The city's other good paying sec-
tors were finance, insurance & real estate ($40,467), engineering & management ($40.213) and
education ($36.272). Those averaging below $20,000 included the fast growing employment
agency ($15.254), hotel & amusement ($15,447) and retail ($17.908) sectors.
Temecula's economy is dominated by small firms, with the average size fluctuating from a low
of 11.6 workers in 1991 to a high of 15.0 in 1997 and stabilizing at that level. In 1999, the only
exceptions to the small size rule were in education (187 workers), government (84 workers) and
employment agencies (81 workers). Manufacturing was mid-sized (46.5), as was hotel &
amusement (36.2). The other sectors averaged under 20 workers, with most under 10.
Section 5.- Taxable Retail Trade. Temecula's taxable retail sales record is the envy of most
Inland Empire cities. In 1998, its sales surged to a record $923 million. In 1999, they broke the
$1 billion mark. Retail trade has increased in every year since the city's 1989 incorporation,
even during Southern California's severe recession. As a result, the city's retail sales growth has
exceeded that of rapidly expanding Riverside County throughout the decade. In 1998, Temecula
had the inland region's seventeenth largest population but its seventh highest volume of retail
sales. It will move higher now that the Promenade Mall is open.
Taxable retail sales per capita is a good barometer of a community's ability to provide services
to its population as the sales tax is the primary source of municipal finance in California. On this
standard, Temecula has performed extraordinarily well. Its 1998 per capita sales were $19,347,
Section 1
City of Temecula
Pageiii
o
I O~~~@I
an amount that was substantially higher than that of the region's seven cities with over 100,000
people, and wen above the average for Riverside County ($9,017). From 1991-1998, the city's
sales per capita grew by 31.9%, and it appears to have increased by another 10-12% in 1999 to
approximately $21,000. Only two smaner inland cities with major malls have higher per capita
sales: Montclair ($26,463) and Palm Desert ($25,846).
Of the $496 million increase in Temecula's retail sales between 1990-1998,27.6% came from a
$137 million gain in activity by the city's non-retail outlets as they went from 18.6% to 23.4% of
sales. This was mainly from direct sales to the public by manufacturers and distributors, validat-
ing the strategy of encouraging such firms to locate in the city. Another 25.7% of the city's sales
gain was from a $127 million increase by automotive dealers and parts suppliers as their share of
total sales jumped from 16.2% to 21.3%. General merchandisers accounted for $81 million or
16.2% of the gain, and "other" specialty retailers accounted for $59 million or 11.9%. The last
two sectors reached 29.3% of total 1998 sales, a share that will grow now that the Promenade
Mall is open.
Temecula's retail outlets had average sales of $951,283 in 1998, far above the $691,859 average
for all Riverside County retail stores. The city's strongest sector was general merchandise where
sales averaged $2.4 million more than the county average. Next came the automotive sector
which averaged $1.8 million more. The weakest performers were the city's building material
outlets which had sales that were $1.3 million below the countywide average.
Temecula's 1998 per capita taxable sales average of$19,347 was wen above Riverside County's
average of$II,917, despite the fact that the latter figure included a 32.2% upward adjustment to
account for the county's lower median income. Even after this large adjustment, Temecula's per
capita sales exceeded Riverside County's levels in all but two sectors. This means that the city is
a net importer of sales taxes from other communities both overall and in nearly every sector.
The two exceptions were minimal drains in apparel and building materials. The opening of the
Promenade Man will likely eliminate the apparel leakage and the opening of Lowes should im-
prove building material sales.
Section 6.-Industrial Real Estate. As an Inland Empire city, Temecula offers coastal county
companies clear space and labor cost advantages. In addition, it gives them uncongested access
to the inland area's expanding air, rail and ground transportation infrastructure plus a location
equidistant from the San Diego and Orange county markets. As a result, the real estate industry
reports that at least 30 medium sized firms have expanded in the city since 1994, adding 2,487
jobs into its economic base. An but three of these firms were manufacturers. They make prod-
ucts like medical devices, semi-conductors, and communications equipment. Six migrated to
Temecula from Los Angeles, Orange or San Diego counties. The balance moved from elsewhere
in the Inland Empire or were in Temecula and acquired new space to expand.
Temecula is part of the Inland Empire's industrial real estate market, the second strongest in the
United States after suburban Chicago. In 1999, the inland region's 26.1 million square feet of
gross space absorption set a record, surpassing the high of 18.0 million square feet in 1998. In
Southern California, the Inland Empire 220 million square feet of industrial space is second only
to Los Angeles County's 860 million square feet. Coldwen Banker estimates that in April 2000,
Temecula had 7.8 million square feet of industrial space or 3.3% of the inland area's inventory.
Among local cities, this ranked tenth just below San Bernardino (12.9 million) and above Colton
(4.9 million). Nearby, Corona had 2,469,569 square feet available; Moreno Vaney-Perris had
just 7,090 square feet.
o
o
Section 1
City of Temecula
Page iv
o
O~(1!J@j@OD \
Within the Inland Empire, Temecula is the city making the transition from a small to a mid-sized
market. If multi-tenant sites are included in the city's inventory, its potential industrial space
rises to 9,904,065 square feet. This figure has increased 58.4% from the 6.25 million square feet
that existed in 1990.
As of April 2000, 10.8% of Temecula's industrial space was vacant. This puts it in the middle of
the 18 Inland Empire sub-markets. The highest rates were in Pomona (18.2%) and Mira Loma
(17.1%), the latter due to continuing new construction. Corona's vacancy rate was 11.0%; the
Moreno Valley-Perris rate was just 0.6%. By size, Temecula's highest vacancy rate was 21.5%
in the 50,000-99,999 category. In the highly sought after 100,000 plus group, the rate was in the
mid-6% range. Lack of sites has not yet been a limiting factor on the city's ability to draw new
firms and jobs, however, the low vacancy rate among large buildings requires a watchful eye.
Grubb & Ellis estimates that Temecula's industrial space has an average lease rate of $0.39 per
square foot per month. This is lower than the rates in any of Southern California's coastal sub-
markets. For instance, in San Diego County's Escondido and Vista markets, the average is 29%
higher at $0.55 per square foot. Within the Inland Empire, Temecula's $0.39 rate is above the
region's $0.33 and the highest lease rate in the area. The nearest comparable costs are in Corona
at $0.37 and Fontana and Chino at $0.35.
Section 7.-0ualitv Of Life. Temecula's residents enjoy one of the finest life styles in Southern
California. Their children are at or near the top of nearly every measure of educational achieve-
ment for Riverside County. The city has developed an extensive array of parks and recreational
facilities and programs. It has the lowest crime rate among the Inland Empire's major cities.
And, the ocean sea breeze that makes its way to the city through a gap in the mountains gives it a
moderate climate for an inland community and provides a boost to its tourism and wine indus-
tries.
Education. Temecula's young people attend classes in the Temecula Valley Unified School
District, Riverside County's seventh largest district with 17,499 pupils in 2000. The district's
high school students had a completion rate of 95 .5% in 1998 (latest available data), second best
in the county and above its 89.5% average and the 87.0% average for California.
In 1999,40.0% of Temecula's seniors took the Scholastic Assessment Test with an average score
of 1,021, the top score in Riverside County. The city's seniors scored above Riverside County
(949), San Diego County (1,016) and California (1,011). In 1998,21.9% of Temecula's seniors
completed college preparatory classes for the University of California-Cal State University. This
was below the Riverside County (29.2%) and California averages (36.0%).
On an achievement basis, the Temecula district's students tested near the top for students in Riv-
erside County's major districts on the 1999 Stanford-9 tests that are administered to all 2nd to 11 th
graders. Using 5th graders as an example of elementary school students, and omitting students
with English Language problems, the district's mean scaled scores ranked 1st in spelling and 2nd
to the Murrieta district in reading, math and language. Using lOth graders as an example of high
school students, among II high school districts, the city's students tied for 1 st in reading and lan-
guage. They tied for 2nd in social science and 3,d in math, and ranked 3rd in science. In every
case, the city's students scored above the county average and were either just above or just below
California averages.
Temecula is within commuting distance of 22 private and public colleges and universities with a
combined enrollment of over 139,000 students. This includes nationally known private, liberal
arts schools like the Claremont Colleges and the University of Redlands. Impressive scientific
o
o
Section 1
City of Temecula
Page v
o
I O~()D@lbJ@(]i) \
work is being conducted at Harvey Mudd College, California State Polytechnic University at
Pomona, and the University of California, Riverside. Loma Linda University boasts one of the
top medical schools in the world. The University of La Verne School of Law is locating in On-
tario. California State University San Bernardino has an excellent School of Business. Cal State
San Marcos, in nearby San Diego County, offers classes in the city as does UCR Extension and
the University of Redlands. There are five community colleges in the region including Mt. San
Jacinto Community College which also offers classes in the city.
Recreation & Tourism. Temecula has 23 parks and community facilities covering 231 acres.
The system is family oriented with extensive access to soccer, baseball, tennis, in-line skating,
swimming and basketball facilities, many of them lighted. Nearly every park has children's play
areas plus picnic and barbecue facilities. Several places have been set aside for joggers and cy-
clists. The largest park covers 128 acres and offers a large community meeting facility and every
conceivable form of sports and recreation.
Temecula's wine growing area is a unique Inland Empire asset with fifteen wineries growing a
wide range of California's varietal grapes. The area serves as a hub for the city's tourism activ-
ity. Meanwhile, the expansion of the Indian gaming at the Pechanga Entertainment Center is
adding to the lure of an area already known for events like the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine
Festival, the Rod Run, Temecula Valley International Film Festival and more.
Public Safety. Temecula is the Inland Empire's safest major city and one of the safest in Cali-
fornia ... and its crime rate continues to fall. From 1991-1999, the number of crimes rate per
1,000 residents dropped 50.5%. There were 501 fewer incidents despite a 48.7% increase in the
population. In the process, the city's already low violent crime rate fell 44.3% and its property
crime rate fell 51.3%. This public safety record is no accident. Temecula's City Council has
adopted a standard of one police officer per 1,000 residents and staffing has grown with the
city's population.
Temecula's outstanding and improving public safety record is reflected in the fact that its 1999
overall crime rate of 27.2 incidents per 1,000 people was well under the next safest major inland
cities: Corona (30.4) and Rancho Cucamonga (31.2). It had the lowest property crime rate with
23.8 incidents per 1,000 residents. Its almost non-existent violent crime rate of3.5 incidents per
1,000 people was just above Corona (2.5) and Rancho Cucamonga (2.3).
Section 8-lnland Emoire. To put Temecula's prospects in perspective, it is useful to understand
the behavior of the Inland Empire region of which it has become such a dynamic part. In the
next decade, it is predicted that the region will be California's fastest growing urban area in
absolute and percentage terms, adding 1.1 million people by 2010 to reach 4.3 million. Today,
the region's 3.2 million people would rank 30th as a separate state behind Connecticut (3.27 mil-
lion) and Oregon (3.28 million). Its $60 billion in total personal income in 1997 exceeded that of
18 states, starting with Arkansas ($49 billion).
Economists forecast the Inland Empire's rapid expansion based upon their understanding of how
geography and economic behavior interact in Southern California. Since World War II, the
Southland has grown outward from downtown Los Angeles and San Diego. At various times,
places like the San Fernando Valley and Orange County in the north, and suburban San Diego
County in the south have been centers of the region's growth. Inevitably, once coastal county
congestion caused land and space costs to rise, development would be forced into the Inland
Empire. This has now occurred. Growth is pushing into Temecula, up the 1-15 from San Diego
County. It is entering from the west from Los Angeles and Orange counties.
o
o
Section 1
City of Temecula
Page vi
o
o
o
O~d@(fi)l
This pattern underlies the Inland Empire's employment performance in the 1990s. In this period,
Southern California lost 500,000 jobs with the end of the Cold War. However, there was no pe-
riod when the Inland Empire's employment did not grow. As a result, from 1990-2000, the re-
gion added 261,000 jobs. In this period, San Diego County added 211,000 jobs, Orange County
200,000 and Los Angeles County fell by over 100,000. In 2000, the inland region will add
50,000 jobs for the second year in a row, an unprecedented occurrence.
At its core, the development of the Inland Empire is occurring because it is the last region of the
Southern California area to have large amounts of undeveloped land along developed transporta-
tion corridors. This creates a location advantage for both residential and industrial/commercial
developers. Put simply, land is cheaper in the Inland Empire and in its cities including Temec-
ula. The homes and buildings constructed there sell or lease for substantially less than in
neighboring San Diego, Los Angeles or Orange counties.
At the same time, the Inland Empire's rapid population growth has created a second, less obvi-
ous advantage for firms locating in cities like Temecula. People are willing to work for less to
avoid commuting to coastal counties. A study of over 470 occupations common to each part of
Southern California found that Inland Empire firms had an average labor cost advantage of2.7%
compared to San Diego County, 7.5% to Orange County and 9.3% to Los Angeles County.
Finally, nearly all cargo flowing into and out of the Greater Los Angeles Area by land must flow
through the Inland Empire. This is the case as the Cajon Pass on the 1-15 and the Banning Pass
on the 1-10 are the principal rail and trucking routes to the balance of the United States. This lo-
cation advantage, combined with available inexpensive land, has made the region the logistics
capital of the Southland. Firms save time in getting their products to market by locating in the
region.
As an Inland Empire community, Temecula benefits from all of these location advantages vis-a-
vis Southern California's coastal counties. Plus, it has the advantages within the inland region of
offering an extraordinarily beautiful setting for workers, executives and entrepreneurs to live.
For these reasons, the community is expected to be one of Southern California's most prosperous
communities over the next decade.
Sumumlllll"V
It is impossible to review the economic forces affecting Temecula and the Inland Empire and
without predicting a rosy future for the city. The region's geographic location, competitive cost
structure, and sophisticated logistics have put it in a position to have the nation's fastest growing
population, and Southern California's fastest growing economy. Firms that need to be in the
midst of California's booming economy, while avoiding its higher costs of doing business, are
finding it to be an outstanding place to locate. At the same time, the executives of cutting edge
firms are putting their firms in Temecula because they can save money, access a well educated
labor force and live in a very family oriented city, with new upscale neighborhoods, located in a
beautiful setting.
Section 1
city ofTemecula
Page vii
o
o
o
~@@(ffi)[?)Gu~@ @GiJ@(ffi)OO~~1
CCll1I'Y ((J) IF 1I'JEMJECC1UILA
~JECC1I'll((J)N 2
ill JEM ((J)(; JRAJPIHIll CC S
Temecula is rapidly becoming one of the nicest places to live in Southern California. The city's
climate is milder than most inland areas. It has a growing wine industry. Its housing stock is
quite new, and much of it is upscale. The community has been carefully planned. Its shopping
and entertainment possibilities are increasing. The economy is expanding with a significant num-
ber of high technology firms and a new regional mall. The local schools are excellent.
The city is unique in that its residents are about equidistant from both San Diego and Orange
County via the Interstate 15 freeway. As a result, it is receiving growth impulses from the south
as well as the north, as families spill into the Inland Empire from Southern California's more
congested coastal counties.
Population. From 1990-2000, Temecula has grown from 27,099 people to 53,791, a gain of
26,692 people or 98.5%. In this same period, Riverside County has been the fastest growing ma-
jor county in California, adding 302,894 people, a gain of 30.1 %. In 2000, the city is the 17th
largest city in the Inland Empire and 5th largest in Riverside County. Its 98.5% growth rate dur-
ing the decade has been the 2nd fastest among inland area cities with more than 50,000 people,
behind Chino Hills (118.2%). Strong population growth occurred straight through the recession
with growth rates varying from 4.6% to 13.7%. The rate was a very rapid 10.2% in 1999-2000
(Exhibits 1-4).
Income. Temecula is succeeding, in part, because Southern California's coastal counties are run-
ning out of land and the community offers families the opportunity to acquire homes in a
beautiful setting at reasonable prices. As a result, many professionals and younger families are
migrating to it from San Diego and Orange counties. As a result, the city's 1999 median family
income was estimated at $60,212. Its average household income was $73,695 and its per capita
income was $24,921 (Exhibit 5). Each of these was substantially above the equivalent income
measures for Riverside County: $45,421, $61,286 and $21,072 respectively.
In 1999, the city's total personal income was estimated to have reached $1.22 billion (Exhibit 6).
This was not that far behind the total personal incomes of cities like Moreno Valley and San Ber-
nardino with much larger populations. It is thus no surprise to find that the largest percentage of
Temecula families (32.2%) were in the $45,000-$74,999 bracket, and 25.8% were over the
Section 2
City of Temecula
Page 1
o
o
o
[QXoo:ru~[J@~[fu~@ @Gi:@[J@OOuf@{bJ@@!
$100,000 level. For Riverside County as a whole, the largest group was in the $0-$29,999 range
(30.9%), and 16.8% had incomes of$100,000 or more (Exhibit 7-8).
Education Level of Adults. Temecula began the 1990s with a well educated population, and its
population trends and school performance figures (Section VII of this report) have allowed it to
maintain that position. In 1990,63.0% of the city's residents had at least attended college. That
is a larger share of the adult population than for Riverside (47.6%), San Bernardino (48.4%), Los
Angeles (49.3%), San Diego (59.1%) or Orange (61.1%) counties. In terms of degrees, 21.9% of
Temecula's residents had either a bachelors degree or advanced degree at the beginning of the
decade. This was more than San Bernardino (15.0%) or Riverside (14.5%) counties, but less than
Los Angeles (22.3%), San Diego (25.3%) and Orange (27.8%) counties (Exhibits 9-10).
Ethnicitv. Though Temecula is an ethnically diverse community, it is much less so than sur-
rounding counties. In 1999, it is estimated that 77.2% of the city's residents were White (Exhibits
11-12). This was down from 80.7% in 1990 but much higher than the rate of Riverside County
(60.1%). Meanwhile, 17.2% of city residents classified themselves culturally as Hispanic. This
was up from 14.5% in 1990, though much less than the 25.9% in Riverside County.
Among other groups, 3.9% of Temecula residents were estimated to be Asian or other groups in
1999 (up from 3.3% in 1990 but below the 5%-6% for Inland Empire or the 9.4% of San Diego
County). Black residents were estimated to make up 1.7% of the city (up from 1.5% in 1990).
The comparable shares of the Black population were 5.4% for Riverside County, 8.7% in San
Bernardino County and 6.1 % in San Diego County.
To summarize, demographically, Temecula emerges as a rapidly growing city, with some ethnic
diversity, where relatively young and well-educated families are raising children, and doing well
economically.
Note: The 1990 Census and estimates by California state agencies have served as the basis for
this section. The difficulties faced in making these estimates for Temecula are several. Since
1990, the baby boomers have aged nine years. California has had a severe recession and recov-
ery. Hispanic families have had more than the average number of children. Asian families have
become a stronger influence in Southern California. In addition, Temecula's new home market
has been very strong.
As a result, the Temecula of today is undoubtedly an older, somewhat better educated, slightly
more diverse city, with a larger share of married couples with children. The natural forces af-
fecting the city's resident population have provided the extra age and diversity. The influx of
new home owners to the community has undoubtedly added families with better educations and
incomes. The latter is the case as the screen through which families have had to pass to be able
to move to Temecula has been the mortgage qualification process.
Section 2
City of remecula
Page 2
o
o
o
[QX;wo~[f@[?)lliJn@ @GiJ@[f@OO[jt@(b'j@@!
;- ~1Jo~1J~
l
'iJ'~E2J&'&ru.~~~
Year Temecula Riverside County San Bernardino County
]990 27,099 1,170,413 1,418,380
]99] 27,264 0.6% 1,223,227 4.5% 1,464,687 3.3%
]992 31,005 13.7% 1,268,844 3.7% 1,508,714 3.0%
]993 33,226 7.2% 1,304,447 2.8% 1,539,621 2.0%
]994 35,771 7.7% 1,331,988 2.1% 1,559,146 1.3%
]995 39,284 9.8% 1,355,571 1.8% 1,572,676 0.9%
]996 41,850 6.5% 1,381,781 1.9% 1,587,154 0.9%
]997 43,760 4.6% 1,400,384 1.3% 1,604,963 1.1%
]998 46,564 6.4% 1,441,237 2.9% 1,621,874 1.1%
]999 48,828 4.9% 1,473,307 2.2% 1,654,007 2.0%
2000 53,791 10.2% 1,522,855 3.4% 1,689,281 2.1%
]990-2000 26,692 98.5% 352,442 30.1% 270,901 19.1%
Source: CA Department of Finance, E-5 Reports
Population Growth ...
o From 1990-1999, the population of Temecula has grown from 27,099 to 53,791. That is a gain of 26,692 people
or 98.5% (Exhibit f). During this same period of time, Riverside County grew by 30.1% and San Bernardino
County by 19.1%.
o Temecula's rapid population growth represents a relatively new phenomena for Southern California. A large
number of the city's new residents have migrated north from San Diego County along the I-IS freeway. Nor-
mally, a Southern California community undergoes rapid growth only when population spills into from Orange or
Los Angeles counties.
o Temecula's population growth rates have been far exceeding those of Riverside County (Exhibit 2). Starting in
1992, the slowest growth rate was 4.6% in 1997. It was 10.2% from 1999-2000.
~&~~~~
'iJ'~1J~
13.7%
o Temecula
D RiversIde County
9.8%
10.2%
7.2%
7.7%
6.5%
6.4%
4.5%
4.6%
4.9%
3.7%
3.4%
2.8%
2.9%
2.1%
2.2%
0.6%
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Source: CA Department of Finance, E-5 Reports
Section 2
City of Temscula
Page 3
o
o
o
~@:@(ffi)~GD~@ @GiJ@(ffi)@@uf@\m~1
~~~~
~~~'\J~
City 1990 2000 Chaue % Chan2e
I Corona 75,943 122,989 47,046 61.9%
2 Riverside 226,546 259,738 33,192 14.7%
3 Chino Hills I 27,608 60,236 32,628 118.2%
4 Fontana 87,535 117,395 29,860 34.1%
5 Temetula 27,099 53,"/,9' 26,692 98.5%
6 Hemet 36,094 62,751 26,657 73.9%
7 R. Cucamonga 101,409 125,585 24,176 23.8%
8 Murrieta 1 20,000 43,989 23,989 119.9%
9 Victorville 40,674 64,455 23,781 58.5%
10 Moreno Valley 118,779 141,274 22,495 18.9%
II San Bdno 164,676 186,351 21,675 13.2%
12 Ontario 133,179 151,488 18,309 13.7%
13 Palm Desert 23,252 37,634 14,382 61.9%
14 Hesperia 50,418 63,589 13,171 26.1%
15 La Quinta 11,215 24,240 13,025 116.1%
16 Blythe 8,448 21,453 13,005 153.9%
17 Lake Elsinore 18,316 30,370 12,054 65.8%
18 Rialto 72,395 83,666 11,271 15.6%
19 Apple Valley 46,079 56,980 10,901 23.7%
20 Penis 21,500 32,369 10,869 50.6%
(') 1990 population Chino Hills, Murrieta estimates based upon Census Planning District
Source: CA Department of Finance, E-5 Reports, 1990-2000
Population Growth. . .
o In absolute terms, Temecula's 26,692 gain in population made it the 5'h fastest growing city in the Inland Empire
during the 1990s (Exhibit 3). The cities that added more people included: Corona (47,046), Riverside (33,192),
Chino Hills (32,628), and Fontana (29,860).
o Among cities with over 50,000 people, Temecula's 1990-1999 growth rate of 98.5% was the 2" fastest in the
Inland Empire behind Chino Hills (lI8.2%). The other cities in the region with very rapid growth rates were
Hemet (73.9%), Victorville (61.9%) and Corona (58.5%)
~410~~~~
1li1lffil!I~~<!f)IiJMIiX!)~@11i1il!ml
, :~.
"
~ ~ '
, :f I
4' ,/
;/
Q
-I
"
4'
J
,I
",'
I
I
i?
.:
I
j1
o
'"
f l'
~ ~
~ P
'r'~ al!;'
~
.!f
;!
,/
d'
I /'
,,0
.s.$i
,I I
~~ b
"i
Sourco: CADepm1mcnlofFilllll1ce,E-5RepottJ I
Section 2
City of Temecula
Page 4
o
o
o
~@@[i@~GuO@ @Gu@[i@OO[Jf@\ill@@!
~@.,~~~lJ~
'jJ'~~~~
Temecula Riverside County
Income Range Families Percent Families Percent
$ 0,000-$14,999 773 4.7% 52,658 10.4%
$15,000-$29,999 2,026 12.3% 104,084 20.5%
$30,000-$44,999 2,701 16.4% 94,359 18.6%
$45,000-$59,999 2,715 16.4% 77,467 15.3%
$60,000-$74,999 2,609 15.8% 60.829 12.0%
$75,000-$99,999 1,431 8.7% 32,032 6.3%
$100,000 and up 4,258 25.8% 85,142 16.8%
Total 16,612 100.0% 606,671 100.0%
MediaD household income $60,212 $45,421
Total Income (000) $1,216,847 $31,045,510
Average Household Income $73,696 $61,286
Per Capita Income $24,921 $21,072
I Estimates allow for changes in CPI, population real income.
2 Assumes stable relative income levels & 14% change in average family purchasing power since
1989.
Source: U. S. Census, 1990, Economics & Politics, Inc. estimates 1998.
INCOME, 1999. . .
o Temecula's 1999 estimated median income was $60,212 (Exhibit 5). This ranked 8th among the 48 cities in the
Inland Empire. Its median income was $14,751 (32.6%) above the $45,421 for all of Riverside County.
o Temecula's 1999 average household income was $73,695. Its per capita income was $24,921. This was second
highest among major inland cities behind Rancho Cucamonga ($25,347) and ahead of Corona ($22.422).
o Temecula's 1999 total personal income was $1.22 billion (Exhibit 6). Though its population was just 48,828, the
total personal income of its population was close to that of Inland Empire cities nearly three times its size.
~@.,o'jJ'@ilij) ~ ~ lJ~ ~D
'jJ'~ ES ~ ~ @Ifulil ~ lJ(jX!),jiXOO)
$5.28
$3.09 $2.89
$2.63 $2.55 $2.54
$1.90
$1.22
..4Q ~ l
,
~.. ,
.
Riverside
S Bdno
Corona
Ontario
Moreno V
Fontana
Temecula
R. Cuca
Source: U.S. Census, 1990, Economics & Politics, Inc.
Section 2
City of Temecula
Page 6
o
o
o
@oo:ru~[ffi)~GiJO@ @OiJ@[ffi)OO[ff@\m@@!
1~7Jo~~il~
'ij'~
$100,000 & UP
25.8%
$30,000-$44,99
16.4%
$75,000-$99,999
8.7%
$45,000-$74,999
32.2%
INCOME DISTRIBUTION, 1999. . .
o in 1999, the largest share of Temecula's households, 32.2%, were in the $45,000-$74,999 income group (Exhibit
7). For Riverside County as a whole, the largest percent was the 30.9% who were in the $0-29,999 category (Ex-
hibit8).
o In 1999, 25.8% of Temecula's families made more than $100,000. This compared to 16.8% for Riverside
County.
o Temecula's second largest income was in the $100,000 & up group. For Riverside County, the second largest
group was in the 27.3% who were in the $45,000-$74,999 income group.
I~@'~~il~
~~
$100,000 & uP
16.8%
$0-$29,999
" 30.9%
$75,000-$99,999
6.3%
$4.5,000-$74,999
27.3%
$30,000-$44,999
18.6%
Section 2
City of Temecula
Page 6
o
o
o
@:ooJD~[f@~[lu~@ @Ui:@[f@OO[jf@l~'k~1
~@.,~~'1Jm
l 'jj'~~~~~~~~
Highe't Education Level San Bdno. Riverside Lo, Angele, Orange San Diego
Temecula Countv County County County County
Less 9 Years 4.2% 8.8% 10.2% 15.6% 9.0% 7.6%
9 to 12 Years Non-graduate 8.3% 15.8% 15.7% 14.4% 9.8% 10.5%
High School Diploma/GED 24.6% 27.0% 26.4% 20.7% 20.1% 22.8%
Some College 30.5% 25.0% 25.6% 19.7% 24.5% 25.6%
Associated Arts 10.6% 8.5% 7.5% 7.4% 8.9% 8.2%
Bachelors Degree 16.2% 9.8% 9.6% 14.5% 18.7% 16.5%
Graduate Degree 5.7% 5.2% 4.9% 7.8% 9.1% 8.8%
TOTAL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Educational Levels, 1990 . . .
Source: u.s. Census, 1990
o Temecula began the decade with a well-educated population: 87.6% of residents 25 years & older had graduated
from high school in 1990. This was well above the performance of Southern California', counties where the per-
centage varied from 81.9% in San Diego County and 81.2% in Orange County to 70.0% in L.A. County. In
Riverside County, the rate was 74.1 %. In San Bernardino County, it was 75.4% (Exhibit 9).
o 63.0% of Temecula's adults had attended some ccllege in 1990, well above the surrounding ccunties: San Ber-
nardino (48.4%), Riverside (47.6%), L.A. (49.3%), San Diego (59. I%) and Orange (6I.I%) (Exhibit 10).
o Some 21.9% of Temecula's adults had a Bachelor's Degree or higher in 1990, above San Bernardino (15.0%)
and Riverside (14.5%) ccunties, but below LA (22.3%), San Diego (25.3%) and Orange counties (27.8%).
o School performance data in Section VII of this report, and the nature of people moving to the city, suggest that
the educational background of the city's population has improved over the decade.
~'1J@"~~~
'jj'~&:,~~~'1J~
o Some College
o Bachelor & Higher
59.1%
61.1%
47.6%
48.4%
49.3%
5.3%
7.8%
2.3%
4.6%
4.9%
Temecula
Riverside
San Bernardino
Los Angeles
San Diego
Orange
College == AA, SA, MA, PH.D. or no degree
Source: U.S. Census, 1990, Economics & Politics, Inc.
Section 2
City of Temecula
Page 7
o
o
o
~~[ffi)~[)u~@ @GiJ@[ffi)OOITfu3~1
r ~lIl1o~~lI~
i 'iJ'~&!J~~~
Ethnic Group Temecula Riverside Co. San Bdno. Co. San Die.o Co.
White 37,718 77.2% 60.1% 53.7% 59.9%
Hispanics(l) 8,411 17.2% 29.5% 31.9% 24.6%
Black 813 1.7% 5.4% 8.7% 6.1%
AsianIPacific Islander 1,886 3.9% 5.0% 5.7% 9.4%
TOTAL 48,828 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Note (1): Hispanics are deducted from all other groups
Source: CA Department of Finance, Economics & Politics, Inc. estimates for Temecula
ETHNICITY, 1999...
o In 1999, it is estimated that Temecula was a somewhat diverse city. The largest share of the population was the
77.2% who were White (Exhibits 11-12). This compared to 80.7% in 1990. This was a much larger percentage
than for the adjacent counties: Riverside (60. 1 %), San Diego (59.9%), San Bernardino (53. 7%).
o Temecula's second largest group were those people who culturally regard themselves as Hispanic. In 1999, they
were estimated to make up 17.2% of the population. This is up from the 14.5% in 1990. In Riverside County,
the share was 29.5%. It was 24.6% in San Diego County. For San Bernardino County, Hispanics constituted
31. 9% of the population.
o In 1999, the Black population was estimated to represent 1. 7% of Temecula's residents, up from 1.5% in 1990.
This was a much smaller share than the 5.4% in Riverside County, the 6.1% in San Diego County, or 8.7% in
San Bernardino County.
o Asians and other groups made up 3.9% of Temecula' , population in 1999, up from 3.3% in 1990. This was also
a smaller share than is found in Riverside (5.0%) and San Bernardino (5.7%) counties. It was much less than the
9.4% in San Diego County or the over 12% in Los Angeles and Orange counties.
l~lI&~~il~1
'iJ'~1I~
Asian & Other
1,886
3.9%
Hispanic
8,411
17.2%
Source: Bureau of the Census, 1990; CA Department of Finance, 1999; Economics & Politics, Inc.
Section 2
City of Temecula
Page 8
o
o
o
~@;@o~~o Om:rlJ@[ffii]iJ@Qf@[li) I
CII1I'1{ (()) JF 1I'JEMJEC1UILA
~JEC1I'II(())N 3
ffi.JE ~II]J) JEN1I'IIAIL
As Temecula enters the 21 st Century, the city is poised to be one of the fastest growing and most
prosperous communities in the Inland Empire. It has one of the nicest settings in the region pro-
viding a natural lure for families seeking a good living environment while avoiding the very high
home prices found in the coastal counties. Temecula's location on the 1-15 freeway, mid-way be-
tween San Diego and Orange Counties, is allowing it to receive growth impulses from both
directions, a new phenomena in Southern California.
As a consequence of these conditions, Temecula has seen its existing and new single family home
sales reach record levels, and homeowners are seeing their property values rising rapidly. In the
city's very small multifamily market, vacancy rates are running below 2% and rental levels are
also rising. Looking ahead, San Diego and Orange counties are running out of residentially
zoned land. As a result, many families are looking inland at high quality communities like Te-
mecula. This growing demand led to a record number of building permits being issued in 1999.
It means that the city's housing market will strengthen in the immediate future, even if interest
rates rise. Only a decline in Southern California's economy would interrupt this favorable sce-
nario.
Home Volumes. Reviewing the data, Temecula's existing home sales peaked at 774 units in
1989. The Post-Cold War recession then started to take hold, and volume plummeted to 446
units by 1990. Sales built to a peak of948 by 1993, before high interest rates cut them to 681 in
1995. Since then, existing home sales have been accelerating upward. They set a record at 1,432
units in 1998. The record was broken in 1999 with sales at 1,505 units (Exhibit 13-16). Within
the Inland Empire, the city's 1999 increase of 5.1 % was the third fastest for existing homes, be-
hind Corona (9.6%) and Fontana (5.9%).
Temecula's new home market followed a similar though more extreme pattern. In 1989, volume
peaked at 866 units. It plunged to 244 and 264 units in 1990 and 1991. Despite the continuing
Southern California recession, the city's new home sales built to a record 1,132 units by 1994,
before settling into a range from 900-1,050 units from 1995-1998. In 1999, a new record was set
at 1,219 units. The 1,275 building permits issued in 1999 foretell another very strong year in
2000 (Exhibits 17-20). Temecula's 1999 sales were the third highest among the Inland Empire's
major markets behind Corona (1,569) and Fontana (1,434).
Home Prices. On the price front, the long decline in Southern California's home values is over.
For Temecula, this is good news. In 4th quarter 1999, the city's median existing home price was
$174,088, up 10.6% from 4th quarter 1998. Since the recession induced the low price of
$133,584 in 2nd quarter 1996, the city's prices have rebounded by 30.8%. However, the median
price was still 10.1% below the all time high of$194,388 in 1st quarter 1990 (Exhibits 21-22).
For all of 1999, Temecu1a's median price for existing homes was $168,841. That was 8.1%
above the $156,162 for those sold in 1998. Among major Inland Empire communities, this per-
centage was below that for existing home prices increases in Corona (12.1%), Riverside (11.5%),
Section 3
City of Temecula
Page 9
o
~@@~~~o OUiJ\J@[fUi]j)tillJ@[j1J I
Fontana (9.9%) and San Bernardino (9.7%), but faster than Ontario (7.8%), Rancho Cucamonga
(6.8%) and Moreno VaHey (6.5%) (Exhibits 23-24). On a Southern California basis, Temecula's
existing homes are a real bargain. The city's 4th quarter 1999 median price of$174,000 was from
$13,000 to $89,000 less expensive than median prices in Los Angeles County ($187,000), San
Diego ($215, 000), Ventura ($237,000) or Orange ($263,000) counties (Exhibit 29).
Temecula's new homes traded at a median price of $206,729 in 4th quarter 1999 (Exhibits 25-26).
That was $76,183 or 58.4% above the recession induced low of $130,547 in 1st quarter 1993.
However, the city's median new home price remains $8,556 or 4.0% below the $215,286 record
set in 4th quarter 1990.
For all of 1999, the 1,219 new homes sold in Temecula traded at a median price of $200,417.
This was 12.7% above the $177,894 median price for 1998. Among large Inland Empire cities,
this percentage increase was faster than Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga, but slower than gains
in other major markets. The city's median new home price was in the center of the Inland Em-
pire's major markets with higher prices in Rancho Cucamonga ($237,032), Corona ($210,640)
and Ontario ($202,200) but lower ones in Moreno Valley ($196.995), Riverside ($183,730),
Fontana ($169,087) and San Bernardino ($147,669) (Exhibit 27-28). On a Southern California
basis, there is little wonder why Temecula is attracting new home buyers. Its 4th quarter 1999
median priced new home of $207,000 was from $73,000 to $140,000 less expensive than median
home prices in Los Angeles ($280,000), San Diego ($288,000), Ventura ($338,500) and Orange
($347,000) counties (Exhibit 29).
Multi-Tenant Market. In 4th quarter 1999, multi-tenant units represented 19.2% of Temecula's
housing stock (Exhibits 31). Only Moreno Valley (12.9%) had a lower percent. In the Temecula
Valley market, the multi-tenant vacancy rate was a very low 1.8%, down from 6.8% in 1998 (Ex-
hibit 30). The average monthly rental rate was $750 in 1999, up from $572 in 1998 (2.2%). The
city's rental rate was the 5th highest among the Inland Empire's markets behind Chino-Chino
Hills ($852), Corona ($852), Rancho Cucamonga-Ontario ($825) and Upland-Montclair ($756).
Comoosition. Turnover & Densitv. Temecula's housing stock grew by 7,875 units from 1990-
2000, up 73.9% (Exhibit 31). All but 716 of the city's new units were single family homes. In
2000, 78.1 % of the city's homes are single family dwellings, the second highest percentage
among major Inland Empire cities (Exhibit 32). Meanwhile, 14.3% of city dwellings were as-
sumed to be vacant by the CA Department of Finance, the highest level in the Inland Empire
(Exhibit 33). The figure is an over-estimate as it was based upon 1990 conditions when a large
number of homes had been built and the recession was depressing demand.
Temecula is a fairly densely populated city, with 3.39 people per occupied dwelling unit in 2000
(Exhibit 34). This places it in the middle of the inland region's major area cities. In 1999,20.2%
of the city's housing stock turned over, giving it the most active Inland Empire market (Exhibit
35). Finally, looking ahead, builders were granted a record 1,275 permits for new single family
homes in Temecula during 1999, 10.0% of the permits issued in Riverside County (Exhibits 36).
When these permits are combined with the large number issued in nearby unincorporated areas, it
is clear that the county's housing market is increasingly focusing on the city.
Market. A recent survey of 2,612 families buying homes or visiting new tracts in Temecu1a re-
vealed the importance of San Diego residents. Of the sales, 45% were from San Diego County,
9% were from Orange County. Of the visits, 45% were from San Diego County and 11% were
from Orange County. In each case, the balance were from the Inland Empire.
o
o
Section 3
City of TemeQula
Page 10
o
o
o
~(;@~@@~o O~~[jiJ I
~'j)~~~~
~o'j)~~
1,432 1,505
948 941
774 831 765 812
681
463 466 529
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Source: Dataquick
Existing Home Sales. . .
o Temecula's existing home sales volume peaked at 774 units in 1989 before the city incorporated, but declined to
466 in 1990 when the recession began. Sales built to a peak of948 by 1993, before high rates cut them to 681 in
1995. Since then, sales have been accelerating, reaching a record 1,505 units in 1999. (Exhibit 13).
o Looking at quarterly existing home sales, the 466 units sold in 3" quarter 1999 was Temecula's highest for a 3-
month period (Exhibit 14). Southern California's expanding job market, combined with the city's outstanding
location and moderate prices mean that the city's existing home markets should continue doing well, even as the
Federal Reserve raises rates to moderate U.S. economic growth.
r ~'iI41~~~'jj'~~o'ilOOdUM;)
Quarter Sale. I-Year Chu. Quarter Sale. I-Year Chu.
lst-88 62 l.t-94 183 10.2%
2nd-88 113 2nd-94 259 -3.0%
Jrd-88 133 Jrd-94 174 -40.8%
4th-88 155 4th-94 149 -32.6%
lst-89 168 171.0% l.t-95 145 -20.8%
2nd-89 244 115.9% 2nd-95 184 -29.0%
Jrd-89 199 49.6% Jrd-95 206 18.4%
4th-89 163 5.2% 4th-95 146 -2.0%
lst-90 132 -21.4% lst-96 148 2.1%
2nd-90 129 -47.1% 2nd-96 238 29.3%
Jrd-90 115 -42.2% Jrd-96 220 6.8%
4th-90 90 -44.8% 4th-96 206 41.1%
lst-91 68 -48.5% lst-97 185 25.0%
2nd-91 123 -4.7% 2nd-97 245 2.9%
Jrd-91 142 23.5% Jrd-97 254 15.5%
4th-91 196 117.8% 4th-97 257 24.8%
lst-92 145 113.2% lst-98 235 27.0%
2nd-92 218 77.2% 2nd-98 418 70.6%
Jrd-92 154 8.5% Jrd-98 463 82.3%
4th-92 314 60.2% 4th-98 316 23.0%
lst-9J 166 14.5% lst-99 292 24.3%
2nd-9J 267 22.5% 2nd-99 416 -0.5%
Jrd-9J 294 90.9% Jrd-99 466 0.6%
4th-9J 221 -29.6% 4th-99 331 4.7%
SCUllY'.f':' nRt~nlli~k
Section 3
City of Temecula
Page 11
o
o
o
~@;@~~ooO OGiJi1@xruDiJ~(iiJ I
~1l~~~~~
1J~ ~ Illlfm;:@] ~ ~ ~ ll(OO)JjXjX!). 1l~1l1!lOO)
9.6%
5.9% 5.1%
"F~ 2.7%
'" ..~~6 ~~ _ '"
,z.,"tQ'1 .
~,,. I l
,
,~,
'. ,'0;:.0
-0.4%
-4.4% -5.0% -5.3%
Corona
Fontana
Temecula
Ontario
Riverside
Moreno _v R _ Cucamonga
San Bdno
Source: Dataquick
Existing Home Sales. . .
o Temecula's existing home sales gain of 5.1% was the 3" fastest among major Inland Empire cities behind Co-
rona (9.6%) and Fontana (5.9%) (Exhibit 15). Temecula's superb location and the influence of San Diego
buyers, combined with the city's affordable prices, should make it a major focus for the Inland Empire's residen-
tial volume for the foreseeable future.
o The recession caused Temecula's existing home sales to fall dramatically in 1990 (-39.8%). However, the city's
excellent location allowed sales to recover through the worst years of the recession, from 1991-1993. In 1994-
1995, the recession and a dramatic rise in interest rates again hurt sales. Since that time, the city's existing home
market has grown rapidly, up at double digit rates from 1996-1998 and 5.1% in 1999. 1998 saw a startling
52.2% increase (Exhibit 16). Though interest rates are rising again, the city's existing home market should stay
healthy as there is little affordable housing left in coastal county markets.
~1J@"~Ilfu:li:i:@~~~
1J~1J0001J~
67.2%
57.1%
52.2%
5.1%
-19.3%
-39.8%
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
t997
1998
1999
I Source: Dataquick I
Section 3
City of Temecula
Page 12
o
o
o
~~~~k;)~O oaW@[ffiUi)/ill"@OiJ ,
~4J~o~~~
~o4J~~
1,219
1,132 1.057
984
957
866 915
810
565
454
244 264
r II I
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Source: Datnquick
New Home Sales. . .
o Temecula's new home sales are in a period of explosive growth (Exhibit 17). The 1,219 units sold in 1999 were
a record and came on top of the third highest year in 1998 at 1,057. With 1,275 permits issued in 1999, and con-
siderable construction underway, sales should match or exceed this level in 2000.
o On a quarterly basis, Temecula's new home sales were at record levels in 300 and 4th quarter 1999. The 371 sales
of 3" quarter 1999 was the all time high. With San Diego and Orange counties running short of residential
space, plus Temecula's beautiful environment, its new home sales will likely be strong for a long time.
~1J@.,~~~'ii'~~.1J~1J~
Quarter Sale, l-Vear Chao Quarter Sales l-Vear Chao
lst-88 30 lst-94 234 98.3%
2nd-88 65 2nd-94 254 76.4%
3rd-88 141 3rd-94 342 37.3%
4th-88 218 4th-94 302 1.0%
lst-89 219 630.0% lst-95 175 -25.2%
2nd-89 316 386.2% 2nd-95 255 0.4%
3rd-89 189 34.0% 3rd-95 219 -36.0%
4tll-89 142 -34.9% 4th-95 266 -11.9%
lst-90 83 -62.1% lst-96 202 15.4%
2nd-90 86 -79.1% 2nd-96 231 -9.4%
3rd-90 39 -79.4% 3rd-96 274 25.1%
4th-90 56 -60.6% 4th-96 277 4.1%
lst-91 28 -66.3% lst-97 196 -3.0%
2nd-91 43 -34.8% 2nd-97 239 3.5%
3rd-91 90 130.8% 3rd-97 232 -15.3%
4tll-91 103 83.9% 4th-97 290 4.7%
. lst-92 131 367.9% lst-98 287 46.4%
2nd-92 168 290.7% 2nd-98 310 29.7%
3rd-92 118 31.1% 3rd-98 211 -9.1%
4th-92 148 43.7% 4th-98 249 -14.1%
lst-93 118 -9.9% lst-99 229 -20.2%
2nd-93 144 -14.3% 2nd-99 290 -6.5%
3rd-93 249 111.0% 3rd'99 311 75.8%
4th-93 299 102.0% 4th-99 329 32.1%
Source: Dataquick
Section 3
City of Tem.cula
Page 14
o
o
~~OcililUiJOO<;)O Oou(f@[ffiUi)@flfJ@[Ji) l
~lIIDo~ 1Xiffi:i:@~ 0 ~1!L\J:lil:il
'jf~&!, IlJiftffix!) ~~@;@l1l(j)j)JiliX!).1I~1I~
1569 -21.9%)
1434 36.6%)
1219 15.3%)
17 ",,"~
"'.
779 (23.3%) 712 32.8%
, r';+i'
/~1'2 ,
i'/.'
Corona
Fontana
Temecula
Riverside R_Cucamonga San Beino
Ontario
Moreno _V
I Source: Dataquick I
New Home Sales. . .
o In 1999, Temecula's new home sales of 1,219 units was the thirdlargest number sold within an Inland Empire
city behind the 1,569 in Corona and 1,434 in Fontana (Exhibit /9). The city's 15.3% increase in new home sales
was the 5th largest percentage gain among the major markets.
o Temecula's new home sales suffered in 1990-1991 due to the recession at the end of the Cold War and the corre-
sponding decline in the Southland's residential markets (Exhibit 20). However, despite the economy, new home
sales began recovering in 1992 as San Diego buyers came north and Orange County buyers ventured south along
the/-IS. A brief slowdown occurred in 1995, when interest rates jumped dramatically. However, sales recovered
dramatically in 1996 slowed slightly in 1997 and have been strong since.
o As a result of this pattern, and the 1,275 permits issued in 1999, Temecula's new home market should remain at a
record level, despite rising interest rates.
~w.,~IXiffi:i:@~~ ~
~11~11~
114.0% 112.2%
90.7%
43.4% 39.8%
8.2% I II I 10.4% 15.3%
I
I I -2.7%
-19.2%
-71.8%
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
0 I Source: Dataquick I
Section 3 City of Temecula Page 15
o
o
o
~~O@J@~O O~~[(iJ!
I
~mo~~~~
'ii'~1I~1I~
$200,000
$190,000
$180,000
$170,000
$160,000
$150,000
$140,000
$130,000
$120,000
$110,000
$100.000
o
J
Q.,
'>9C
'>l.Y
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Source: Datllquick
Existing Home Prices. . .
o At $174,088, Temecula's existing home prices averaged 10.6% more in 4th quarter 1999 than they did in 4th
quarter 1998. Prices surged throughout 1999 and were up $22,522 or 12.7% for all four quarters of the year.
o Historically, Temecula's median existing home price peaked at $194,388 in 1" quarter 1990. It then fell to
$133,584 by 2"d quarter 1996 (-31.3%) as a result of Southern California's recession (Exhibits 21-22). Since
then, the median existing home price has climbed back to as high as $174,733 in 3" quarter 1999, up 30.8%.
However, that is still $19,654 or 10.1% below the 1990 record.
Ml'Mlw..~~~'U'~~,'\J~'\J~
Quarter Aw. Price I-Year Che. Quarter AVrl. Price I-Year Che.
Ist-88 $106,593 Ist-94 $155,928 5.3%
2nd-88 $115,249 2nd-94 $143,361 -0.1%
Jrd-88 $130,770 Jrd-94 $138,132 -2.3%
4th-88 $138,518 4th-94 $152,750 2.4%
Ist-89 $149,289 40.1% Ist-95 $158,620 1.7%
2nd-89 $151,347 31.3% 2nd-95 $137,673 -4.0%
Jrd-89 $186,482 42.6% Jrd-95 $140,568 1.8%
4th-89 $162483 17.3% 4th-95 $142,932 -6.4%
Ist-90 $19"-388 30.2% Ist-96 $140,045 -11.7%
2nd-90 $175,132 15.7% 20<1-96 $133,584 -3.0%
Jrd-90 $170,231 -8.7% Jrd-96 $135,087 -3.9%
4th-90 $169,386 4.2% 4th-96 $135,439 -5.2%
Ist-91 $160,438 -17.5% Ist-97 $142,905 2.0%
2nd-91 $171,381 -2.1% 2nd-97 $140,743 5.4%
Jrd-91 $160,416 -5.8% Jrd-97 $133,898 -0.9%
4th-91 $162,551 -4.0% 4th-97 $137,163 1.3%
Ist-92 $162,394 1.2% Ist-98 $141,255 -1.2%
2nd-92 $170,005 -0.8% 2nd-98 $159,748 13.5%
Jrd-92 $140,894 -12.2% Jrd-98 $159,702 19.3%
4th-92 $141,406 -13.0% 4th-98 $157,339 14.7%
Ist-9J $148,046 -8.8% Ist-99 $158,247 12.0%
2nd-9J $143,548 -15.6% 2nd-99 $165,405 3.5%
3rd-93 $141,325 0.3% Jrd-99 $174,733 9.4%
4th-9J $149,110 5.4% 4th-99 $174,088 10.6%
Source: Dataquick
Section 3
City of Temecula
Page 16
o
o
o
~@;@~~~o oaW@[ffii]j)@ili'@(jj) I
~~~~~~
'jj'~&!,~~@tlThls~1l~1l~1l~
12.1% 11.5%
9.9% 9.7% 8.1%
7.8% 6.8% 6.5%
~$~"_.
~'&~ /~,
~..4 '
~
: ~~ '
Corona
Riverside
Fontana
San Bdno
Temecula
Ontario
R _ Cucamonga Moreno _ V
I Source: Dataquick I
Existing Home Prices. . .
o The 1,505 existing homes sold in Temecula during 1999 had a median price of $168,841. This was 8.1 % above
the $156,162 median price at which the 1,432 existing homes sold in 1998 (Exhibit 23).
o The rise in Temecula's existing home prices was consistent with gains in other Inland Empire cities.
o During 1999, Temecula's median existing home price of $168,841 was the 3'" highest among major Inland Em-
pire communities behind Corona ($171,309) and Rancho Cucamonga ($170,891). The next highest was Ontario
at ($130,758).
~?Ja~~~~
~&!,~~~~1l~1l~
$171.309 $170,891 $168841
$130,758 $120,374
$107,253 $100.588
$86,928
Corona
R_Cuca
Temecula
Ontario
Riverside
F oolana
Moreno _ V
San Bdno
Source: Dataquick
Soction3
City of Temecula
Page 17
o
o
o
$230,000
$210,000
$190,000
$170,000
$150,000
$130,000
$110,000
~@@5@bl~O OITiJlf@[JUffi)@ili'@[JiJ I
I ~~~[)(@M@~4
~o4J~~
l,-L
[
X
"lOr OK""
'k In<
1988 1989 1990 1991
~ ~ - ~ - - - ~ =
I Source: Dataquick I
New Home Prices. . .
o Temecula's new homes traded at a median price of $206,729 in 41h quarter 1999. During the recession, the city's
median new home price fell from a peak of $215,286 in 41h quarter 1990 to a low of$130,547 in 1'1 quarter 1993
(-39.4%). Since that time, the median price has risen $76,183 (58.4%) to $206,729 (Exhibits 25-26). However,
the median new home price remains $8,556 or 4.0% below the 1990 record.
o New home volumes and prices are rising rapidly in Temecula because it is the inland city absorbing much of the
housing energy being generated by San Diego County's booming economy. In this respec~ it is playing a similar
role to Corona vis-a-vis Orange County and Fontana vis-a-vis Los Angeles County.
.
~m,~~~li'~~o'ilOOo1)~
Quarter Avo. Priee I-Year Chao Quarter Ava. Price I-Year Cho.
lst-88 $118,600 l't-94 $145,321 11.3%
2nd-88 $134,831 2nd-94 $143,421 6.4%
3rd-88 $133,177 3rd-94 $145,360 5.7%
4th-88 $152,342 4th-94 $152,205 5.3%
lst-89 $152,814 28.8% lst-95 $148,303 2.1%
2nd-89 $154,633 14.7% 2nd-95 $142,108 -0.9%
3rd-89 $171,841 29.0% 3rd-95 $137,005 -5.7%
4th-89 $207,021 35.9% 4th-95 $138,462 -9.0%
lst-90 $183,188 19.9% l't-96 $141,349 -4.7%
2nd-90 $194,182 25.6% 2nd-96 $144,426 1.6%
3rd-90 $198,538 15.5% 3rd-96 $144,131 5.2%
4t11'90 $215,286 4.0% 4th-96 $150,814 8.9%
lst-9l $184,893 0.9% lst-97 $143,071 1.2%
2nd-9l $191,116 -1.6% 2nd-97 $144,021 -0.3%
3rd-9l $174,850 -11.9% 3rd-97 $156,194 8.4%
4th-9l $182,471 -15.2% 4th-97 $165,226 9.6%
lst-92 $145,266 -21.4% lst-98 $184,615 15.1%
2nd-92 $175,386 -8.2% 2nd-98 $177,990 23.6%
3rd-92 $153,386 -12.3% 3rd-98 $175,066 12.1%
4th-92 $145,909 -20.0% 4th-98 $195,478 18.3%
lst-93 $130547 -10.1% lst-99 $198,668 20.7%
2nd-93 $134,844 -23.1% 2nd-99 $198,645 11.6%
3rd-93 $137,470 -10.4% 3rd-99 $197,283 12.7%
4th-93 $144,572 -0.9% 4th-99 $206,729 5.8%
Source: Dataquick
Section 3
City of Temecula
Page 18
o
o
o
~~~@@~o OUiJll@UDDD@iliJ@[Ji) I
~'iJjJo~[}fu):jm)~~
'jJ'~&!,~~~@v.@f1J~1J~1J~
34.2%
20.0% 19.5%
15.4% 13.5% 12.7%
::op~.UJ.z ,...r'.., 10.4%
. -,-,.
.~
-12.8%
Moreno _v
Riverside
Ontario
San Bdna
Temecula
Fontana R_Cucamonga
Corona
I Source: OIlUlquick I
New Home Prices. . .
o During all four quarters of 1999, the 1,219 new homes sold in Temecula traded at a median price of $200,417.
This was 12.7% above the $177,894 median price for the 1,057 new homes that sold during 1998. This price in-
crease was moderate by Inland Empire standards, falling below the price changes of every major city but Fontana
where prices rose 10.4% and Rancho Cucamonga where they fell 12.8% (Exhibit 27).
o Temecula's median new home price of $200,417 was roughly the mid-point for the Inland Empire's major mar-
kets. Higher prices were found in Rancho Cucamonga ($237,032), Corona ($210,640) and Ontario ($202,200).
Lower median new home prices were found in Moreno Valley ($196,995), Riverside ($183,730), Fontana
($169,087) and San Bernardino ($147,669).
~~cliWW~~~
'jJ'~&!,~~~@v.@f1J~ 'iJW)
$237 032
$210640 $202200 $200417
.
$196995
$183,730
$169087
. W~. ~~
,
""'"
$147,669
R _ Cucamonga Corona
Ontario
Temecula
Moreno _V
Riverside
San Bdna
Fontana
Source: Dataquick
Section 3
City of Temecula
Page 19
o
o
o
~@;@~~liDili\@O OOD\f@(ffii]i)@Q!'@[jiJ I
@;iliM)~~~~
~~~~~<mliI~~~
$338,500
$347,000
$280,000
$288,000
207,000
31,500
40,000
73,000
81,000
Temecula
L.A.
S. Diego Ventura Ornnge Tcmecula
I Source: Dalaquick I
L.A.
S. Diego Ventura Orange
Temecula Homes Prices Compared To Southern California Prices. . .
o Executives, professionals, technicians and first time home buyers are all finding extraordinary home prices in
Temecula. In 4th quarter 1999, Temecula's median priced new home of $207,000 was from $73,000 to $140,000
less exvensive than median home prices in Los Angeles ($280,000), San Diego ($288,000), Ventura ($338,500)
or Orange ($347,000) counties (Exhibit 29).
o Temecula's 4th quarter 1999 median existing home price of $174,000 was from $13,000 to $89,000 less expen-
sive than prices in Los Angeles ($/87,000), San Diego ($2/5,000), Ventura ($237,000) or Orange ($263,000)
counties.
Multi-Tenant Markets. . .
o
In 4th quarter 1999, multi-family units in the Temecula Valley rented for an average of $750 per month, up 2.2%
from 4th quarter 1998. Rental rates in the city rank Slh highest rates among the 12 Inland Empire regions (Exhibit
30).
The 4th quarter 1998 vacancy rate in Temecula-RiaIto multi-family grade A units was an almost non-existent
1.87%. The rate was down from 6.8% in 1998 and was the lowest in the inland area. The low vacancy rates in
the city and region explain why monthly rents are rising and projects are being proposed.
o
~:illlo~~&:'~~
~~4ffil~'\l~
Market V ReaDe" Rates A verfu~e Rent
1998 1999 1998 1999 Percent
Chino/Chino Hills 2.4% 2.3% $800 $852 6.5%
Corona 3.0% 3.2% 796 852 7.0%
R. Cucamonga-Ontario 3.8% 2.2% 775 825 6.5%
Upland/Monlclair 2.3% 2.5% 712 756 6.2%
Temecul~Vall"y 6.8% 1.8% 734 750' 2;2%
Riverside 3.7% 2.6% 647 693 7.1%
Colton/G. Terrace 6.9% 2.4% 614 641 4.4%
Fontana/Rialto 6.2% 2.7% 572 626 9.4%
Coachella Valley 1.8% 2.6% 604 613 1.5%
San Bdno/Highland 11.8% 8.0% 563 594 5.5%
Moreno Vly.Pass Area 5.3% 3.7% 572 585 2.3%
VictorviHe 9.7% 3.7% 515 518 0.6%
Source: Hendricks & Partners
Section 3
City ot Temecula
Page 20
o
o
o
~~~cQ]@~O O[iDll@)[n:ii]i)~[jj) I
umm~oO~@.X?~ .
~'iJ~~ I
17,314 D Single Family
1990 13,070 D Multi-Family
o Mobile Home
U275
114,473
2000 13,785
0276
I Source: CA Department of Finance, E--S Report, 1990 & 2000 I
Dwelling Units. . .
o From 1990-2000, the number of dwelling units in Temecula increased by 7,875 (73.9%). This included 7,159
additional single family units, 715 more multi-tenant units, and one mobile home unit (Exhibit 31).
o In 2000, 78.1% of Temecula's dwellings were single family homes (Exhibit 32). Among major Inland Empire
cities, only Moreno Valley (84.3%) had a large share of its housing stock in single family homes. The next low-
est percentage was in Fontana (77.1%). Again, this is why the city's multifamily vacancy rate is so low.
Ii -
~~~
I 'ii'~ &!J Ili/lmriI ~@Ifuli) @),vmll(ffi)JOOX!)" ~
Riverside San Bdno Ontario Moreno v. R. Cuca. Corona Fontana Temecula
Single Family 57,889 38,999 29,970 35,828 31,268 27,713 28,148 14,473
% Single 66.9% 60.6% 65.5% 84.3% 74.3% 70.3% 77.1% 78,1%
Multi-Tenant 26,453 20,722 13,486 5,432 9,425 10,438 7,556 3,785
Mobile Home 2,127 4,655 2,302 1,233 1,372 1,284 800 276
Total 86,469 64,376 45,758 42,493 42,065 39,435 36,504 18,534
Occupied 81,322 59,337 43,602 39,155 38,929 36,329 32,780 15,875
V Beaney 6.0% 7.8% 4.7% 7.9% 7.5% 7.9% 10.2% 14.3%
Population 259,738 186,351 151,488 141,274 125,585 122,989 117,395 53,779
Density 3.19 3.14 3.47 3.61 3.23 3.39 3.58 3.39
Source: CA Department of Finance, E-5 Reports
o In January 2000, 14.3% of Temecula dwelling units of all kinds were assumed to be vacant by the California De-
partment of Finance. This was the highest for any large Inland Empire city and undoubtedly an overestimate as it
is based upon the 1990 level at the end of the last aggressive housing construction cycle.
~m,~~~
~~o:n:omxg)~~~~~~
10.2%
7.9%
7.8%
7.9%
7.5%
Corona Moreno ~ V San Bdna R _ Cucamonga Riverside
Source: CA Department of F'inancc, E-S Report, 2000
Ontario
Temecula
Fontana
Section 3
City of Temec:ula
Page 21
o
o
o
~~Oc9J@~O OUDiJ@[MJi)~(iD I
~~~~~~@IJ_(@]ix9:
~&!J~~~@:[fJJJ'1X[@_o~~
3.61 3.58 3.47 3.39 3.39 3.23 3.19 3.14
'i
..!>~.t.
''''-it::
. ,
Moreno _v Fontana Ontario Temecula Corona R Cucamonga Riverside San Bdno
I Source: CA Department of Finance, E-5 Report, 2000 I
Population Density & Housing Turnover. . .
. In Temecula, there are an estimated 3.39 people for every occupied dwelling unit in 2000. This is the middle
range for major Inland Empire cities (Exhibit 34).
. One measure of the health of the single family housing market is the ratio of home sales to the city's existing
single family homes. In 1999, sales were equal to 20.2% of Temecula's housing stock. Among large Inland Em-
pire cites, this was the highest turnover ahead of Fontana (16.4%). The lowest turnover was in Ontario (6.8%)
and Rancho Cucamonga (8. 7%).
~~~@f~~~~~~'
~&!J~~~@I!,@J~~4J~
20.2%
, .,.u"<o ., 16.4%
14.4%
, 11.7% 9.8% 9.3%
8.7%
, l I 6.8%
, I
Temecula Fontana Corona San Bdno Riverside Moreno _V R_Cucamonga Ontario
I Source: CA Department of Finance, E-5 Report, 1999 & Dataquick I
.
Temecula's 1999 single family home permits reached 1,275, after being in the 700-800 range from 1995-1998.
The 1999 number was a record and equaled 10% of all permits issued in Riverside County (12,697). It was sec-
ond to the 1,657 issued in Corona. There were also 3,513 permits issued in unincorporated Riverside County
areas, many in the Temecula Valley indicating that the area in and around the city is increasingly becoming the
central focus for the county's housing development.
~~ 0 - I? ~'jj'~~~~~1I~1I~
Year Temecula Growth Riverside Co. Growth San Bdno Co. Growth
1990 72 12,171 11,013
1991 378 425.0% 6,976 42.7% 5,969 -45.8%
1992 661 74.9% 7,607 9.0% 5,882 -1.5%
1993 813 23.0% 7,012 -7.8% 5,354 -9.0%
1994 1,127 38.6% 7,690 9.7% 4,585 -14.4%
1995 815 -27.7% 6,803 -11.5% 3,852 -16.0%
1996 801 -1.7% 7,021 3.2% 4,703 22.1%
1997 786 -1.9% 8,678 23.6% 5,124 9.0%
1998 714 -9.2% 10,758 24.0% 5,602 9.3%
1999 1,275 78.6% 12,697 18.0% 6,571 17.3%
Source: Consbuction InduslIy Research Board, Corona Building Department
Section 3
City of Temecula
Page 22
o
o
o
~~[]@~@[@
CII1I'Y (J)IF 1I'IEMIECLUILA
SIEC1I'II(J)N 41
IEMIP'IL(J) YMIEN1I'
Temecula's emergence as a center of job growth is primarily the result of the migration of firms
and people to the Inland Empire from the Southland's coastal counties. This migration is occur-
ring as the density ofland development in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles counties has cre-
ated a shortage of manufacturing and housing space, and increased space costs.
In most cases, this phenomena is increasing the demand for business space and homes along
transportation corridors in cities directly adjacent to Orange and Los Angeles counties. Temecula
is unique in three ways. A major impetus for the growth is coming north out of San Diego
County instead of down from Orange or Los Angeles counties. It has been able to get firms and
families to leapfrog past many miles of undeveloped land to locate within its borders. And, the
jobs coming to the city are better paying than the Inland Empire average.
Why? Since the city's inception, local leaders have undertaken a consistent and successful pro-
gram to lure high technology firms to the area. These efforts have been aided by the city's physi-
cal beauty and moderate climate. Meanwhile, the completion of the 1-15 freeway has given com-
muters and firms located in Temecula ready access to San Diego and Orange county markets,
while allowing them to avoid the congestion, land restrictions and high costs of those areas.
Emplovment. Between the 1st quarter of 1991 and 1999, Temecula's employment rose from
13,570 to 25,140 (Exhibit 37), up 11,570 jobs or a rapid 85.3%. The city's economy has begun
to specialize with 5,863 of its total jobs in manufacturing (Exhibit 38). Consistent with the city's
rapid population growth, the second largest sector was retail trade with 5,379. These same sec-
tors grew the most from 1991-1999 though in reverse order. Retail trade added 2,551 positions,
before the Promenade Mall opened. Manufacturing added 2,449 jobs. The hotel & amusement
industry was third in growth, gaining 1,469 jobs due to the growth ofthe Pechanga Entertainment
Center, the lure of its wineries, and events like the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
(Exhibit 39).
From 1991-1999, Temecula's annual job growth rates have far exceeded those of the Inland Em-
pire except in 1995 and 1997 (Exhibit 40). In 1999, the city's firms and agencies increased their
employment by 13.4% versus 5.7% for the region (its growth rate was thefastest in California).
Growth in Temecula's employment has been accompanied by many changes in the composition
of the city's job base. While manufacturing employment grew strongly and remained the largest
sector, its share of jobs fell from 25.2% to 23.3% from 1991-1999 as the economy became more
diversified. Retail employment rose from 20.8% to 21.4% in this period and has expanded fur-
ther with the opening of the Promenade Mall (Exhibits 41-42). Large gains occurred in the travel,
employment agency and education sectors. Large declines in the percentage of employment took
place in engineering & management, construction and agriculture.
Section 4
city 01 Temecula
pago 22
o
o
o
~~[kQ)~@uua
Payroll. The payroll expended by firms located in Temecula has followed a pattern similar to
employment, though its growth has been far more aggressive. In 1991, city payrolls totaled $311
million. By 1999, they had more than doubled to $785 million, a gain of $475 million or 153%
(Exhibit 43). When adjustment is made for the 17.5% increase in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-
Riverside Consumer Price Index, the purchasing power of city payrolls had still more than dou-
bled, growing by $421 million (using 1999 prices) or 136% (Exhibit 44).
Temecula's payroll was dominated by manufacturing at $3.3 billion representing 41.6% of the
city's total payroll (Exhibit 45). It was followed by retail trade ($963 million), education ($746
million) and distribution & transportation ($602 million). These same four sectors were respon-
sible for most of the growth in the city's payrolls from 1991-1999. Manufacturing was up $222
million representing 46.6% of payroll growth (Exhibit 46). It was followed by gains in retail
trade ($54 million), education ($43 million) and distribution & transportation ($42 million). The
fastest growth was a 92.7% payroll gain in the hotel & amusement payroll (up $24 million).
AYeral!:e Pay Per Worker. Pay per worker in Temecula rose from $22,885 in 1991 to $31,242
in 1999, an 36.5% increase. The 1999 level is quite high for the Inland Empire, exceeding the
more typical average of $28,212 in the City of Riverside. The 17.5% increase in Southern Cali-
fornia prices took $3,994 of the $8,357 gain, leaving the average worker with a $4,364 increase
in their standard ofliving (Exhibit 47-48).
Within the sectors, Temecula's manufacturing and utility sector averaged $55,682, much more
than the mid-$30,000 range for most inland communities. This is the result of the concentration
of biotechnology, medical and computer chip firms in the city (Exhibits 49-50). The city's other
good paying sectors were finance, insurance & real estate ($40,467), engineering & management
($40,213) and education ($36,272). Those averaging below $20,000 included the fast growing
employment agency ($15,254), hotel & amusement ($15,447) and retail ($17,908) sectors.
Number & Size Of Firms. The number of firms in Temecula grew slowly from 1991-1995, ris-
ing from 1,168 to 1,402. It stabilized at about that level from 1995-1997 before surging to 1,704
in 1999 (Exhibit 51). Five sectors dominated the growth of firms. The 102 new firms in retailing
and 95 in consumer services reflect the Temecula Valley's growing population. The 60 new
firms in business services and 59 in distribution serve its growing business community. The 55
new companies in finance, insurance & real estate are due to the rising population and home
sales. In 1999, these same sectors had the largest concentrations offirms (Exhibits 52-54).
Temecula's economy is dominated by small firms, with the average workforce fluctuating from a
low of 11.6 in 1991, to a high of 15.0 in 1997. The average has since stabilized at that level (Ex-
hibit 55). In 1999, the only exceptions to the small size rule were in education (187), government
(84) and employment agencies (81). Manufacturing was mid-sized (46.5), as was hotel &
amusement (36.2). The other sectors averaged under 20 workers, most under 10 (Exhibit 56).
Match Of Jobs To Workers. Using the 1998 survey of Temecula Valley skills, there appears to
be a relatively good match between the jobs being created in the city and the skills of its work-
force, except for the very large number of retail positions in the city (Exhibit 57). The problem at
the moment is not the mix of jobs being created in Temecula but the fact that new jobs are not
being created as fast as the housing sector is luring new workers to the city. This is not surpris-
ing, given the large number of commuters who leave the region each day to work in San Diego
County, and to a lesser extent in Orange County.
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 23
o
o
o
~~[]@~@[JiJQ
~'tJfJo~~&~
V~~~~,~~~~
26,140
22,170
19,447 20,288
17,662 17,760
16,184
13,670 14,267
\99\
1992
\993
1994
1995
\996
\997
1998
1999
SoW'Ce: CA Employment Development Departmenl
City Employment, 1991-1999 . . .
o In 1999, employment within the City of Temecula reached 25,140. This was a 11,570 job gain since the first
quarter of 1991 or 85.3% (Exhibit 37). Temecula's employment has increased consistently during the 1991-1999
period. The city's employment ignored the recession early in the decade and accelerated in 1999.
o In 1999, the city's largest sector was manufacturing with 5,863 jobs. It was followed by retail trade at 5,379 and
education with 2,057. The smallest sector was government with 168 workers.
o From 1991-1999, employment in two sectors increased by over six-fold (Exhibit 38). Employment agencies in-
creased 658% to 1,378 workers as firms have increasingly relied upon the sector to recruit, train and supply new
workers. Hotel and amusement sector grew 635% to 1,700 jobs due in large part to the Pechanga Entertainment
Center. Only the small engineering and management sector lost jobs, declining by 366 positions.
~~~~
'iJ'~'iI.o~o'il~o'iJ~
Sector 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 %91-99
Manufactwing 3,414 3,752 4,829 5,360 5,419 5,684 5,374 4,748 5,863 71.7%
Retail Trade 2,828 3,105 3,494 4,030 4,105 4,345 4,586 4,984 5,379 90.2%
Education 1,032 1,094 1,217 1,378 1,461 1,603 1,692 1,762 2,057 99.3%
Distribution-Transport 812 1,008 969 978 1,170 1,427 1,246 1,470 1,954 140.5%
Construction 1,489 1,089 869 874 860 1,058 1,122 1,545 1,769 18.8%
Hotel & Amusement 231 285 442 450 419 805 1,181 1,634 1,700 635.0%
Employment Agency 182 409 236 413 246 136 739 1,399 1,378 658.3%
Other Services 430 510 659 826 828 860 1,042 1,039 1,141 165.3%
Agricultnre 1,054 920 1,061 1,038 918 1,145 1,199 1,201 1,050 -0.3%
Finance, Ins., R. Estate 544 534 581 674 607 556 561 632 777 43.0%
Business Services 379 337 511 576 689 727 604 735 759 100.4%
Health Services 358 417 439 470 584 563 539 555 731 104.3%
Engineeling & Mgmt 780 715 778 384 339 412 247 319 414 -46.9%
Government 37 84 100 109 115 126 156 167 168 350.0%
TOTAL 13,579 14,257 16,.184 17,562 17,760 19,447 20,288 22,170 25,140 85..3Y.
SOURCE: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 24
01
o
o
~~[kQ)~@[JiJU
~~~~~~
~'\Jro~o'\J~
2,661
2,449
1,469
1,196 1,142 1,026
711
131
(4)
(366)
Retail Mfg/Util Travel Em _ Agy Dist Edu' Oth_Sv Bus_Sv Health Const FinlRE Govt Agr Eng/Mgt
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Employment Growth By Sector 1999, & Job Growth, 1991.1999 . . .
o Temecula's rapid population growth made retail trade numerically, its fastest growing sector, up 2,551 jobs from
1991-1999. The city's beautiful surroundings and its concerted effort to lure high technology firms have allowed
manufacturing to add the most jobs that bring money to it from the outside world, up 2,449.
o Rapid growth also occurred in travel industry employment (hotel & amusement), up 1,469 jobs, due to the
Pechanga Entertainment Center and the ability of the Temecula Valley to attract tourists to its wineries, Old
Town and major annual events. This sector also brings fresh dollars from the outside world.
o In 1998 and 1999, the city's job growth (9.3% and 13.4%) has also been substantially faster than its population
growth (6.4% and 4.9%) (Exhibit 40). In six of the last eight years, Temecula has added jobs much faster than
the booming Inland Empire. Thus in 1999, its job base grew by 13.4% versus the region's rapid 5.7%.
~@Q),~!2J~~.' -
~!2J~~o4J~~oWID\Jdj)~
~o ~o o TemcculaJob GroWth 1!;!%
D' Temecula PopulntionGrowth
o Inland Empire Job:Growth
~o ~ ~
~o
~ ~
I ~o ~
~ ~o
4.31%4.60/04,6% ~ ~
~o
l~ ~o
4 ~
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
I Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 26
o
o
o
~~[@WffilD@mJ\k
~0'Do~~&i7
~ 4J~~o 4J~
Other
6,417
25.5%
Manufacturing & Utilities
5,863
23.3%
Travel
1,700
6.8%
Construction
1,769
7.0%
Distribution
1,954
7.8%
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Employment Distribution, 1999 & 1991
o In 1999, 23.3% of Temecula's jobs were in the manufacturing and utilities sectors. Though the number of jobs
rose by 2,449, the group's share feU from 25.2% in 1991 as the city's economy became more diversified. Retail-
ing employment had the second largest percent of the economy at 21.4% in 1999, up from 20.8% in 1999. This
share will grow with the opening of the Promenade Mall and the Temecula VaUey's continuing population
growth.
o Among other major moves, the travel industry went from a 1.7% share in 1991 to 6.8% in 1999. Employment
agencies went from 1.3% to 5.5%. Education increased from 7.6% to 8.2%.
o Moving in the opposite direction, construction firms headquartered in Temecula feU to 7.0% in 1999 from 11.0%
in 1999, despite adding 280 workers. Agriculture dropped from 7.8% to 4.2%. Engineering & management (in-
cluded in "other'') feU to 1.6% from 5.7% with the closing of an aerospace firm.
1~@~~&i7~
~ 4J~~o 4J~
Manufacturing & Utilities
/ 3,414
25.2%
Travel
231
1.7%
Distribution
812
6.0%
Education
1,032
7.6%
Construction
1.489
11.0%
Sourt:e: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 26
o
o
o
~~~@~
.
.
.S
;;;
5
~m~IiJiJ~~&!J/'O- -
~~olJffi)olJ~
o nominal ~S
o CPI adjusted
~4
illS ~2 ~6
~8 -
~6 f---
~1 ~1
- - -
-
>--- - >---
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Wage & Salary Payroll 1991-1999 . . .
o In 1991, the payroll for firms located in Temecula was $311 million. In 1999, it was $785 million. That was a
gain of $475 million or 153% in just eight years (Exhibit 43). In effect, the city's payrolls more than doubled in
this time period.
o When allowance is made for the 17.5% increase in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Consumer Price Index
from 1991-1999, the purchasing power of Temecu\a' s payroll increased by $421 million (1999 dollars).
o Of the $475 million increase in payroll, 17.5% or $54 million was needed to make-up for inflation. The other
$421 million represented a real increase in purchasing power or 136% (Exhibit 44).
~@a,~@ff~ 0
~~lJffi)olJ~
Nominal Growth
Inflation Purchasing Power Growth
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 27
o
o
o
~~[@~@aW
~&~~~
'jj'~llro~oll[\woll~~D
Sector 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 %91-99
Manufacnuing $1,047 $1,247 $1,502 $1,784 $2,035 $2,086 $2,136 $2,832 $3,264 211.8%
Retail Trade 426 423 447 548 610 699 758 833 963 126.3%
Education 312 333 370 411 413 455 513 609 746 139.4%
Distribution & Transport 184 244 267 295 364 424 392 498 602 226.9%
Construction 316 257 207 211 231 295 274 378 486 53.8%
Finance, Ins., R. Estate 179 163 165 205 206 172 173 242 315 75.8%
Hotel & Amusement 19 33 45 45 42 99 177 255 263 1261.0%
Other Services 65 78 111 120 147 153 165 181 218 235.1%
Employment Agencies 27 37 24 38 21 17 71 196 210 675.6%
Business Services 71 62 76 91 116 136 132 191 197 177.7%
Health Services 69 76 86 96 127 126 114 138 186 169.6%
Agriculture 149 135 147 159 155 189 210 224 185 24.1%
Engineering & Mgmt 231 196 177 141 149 126 92 118 167 -27.8%
Goverrunent 11 29 31 35 39 41 50 49 53 366.4%
TOTAL $3,105 $3,311 $3,657 $4,178 $4,655 $5,018 $5,258 $6,745 $7,854 152;9%
SOURCE: CA Employment Development Department
Payroll Trends By Sector. . . 1991-1999
o In 1999, Temecula's largest payroll was in manufacturing at $3.3 billion (Exhibit 45). It was followed by retail
trade at $963 million. Education was next at $746 million. Distribution and transportation stood at $602 million.
o The manufacturing payroll was up a very strong $222 million or 67.9% from 1991-1999. Retail trade payroll
grew the second largest amount, up $54 million or 55.8%. The education sector was up $43 million, or 58.2%.
The travel industry had the fastest payroll growth, up 92.7% ($24 million). The engineering and management
sector was the only sector with a decline in payroll due to the loss of a defense contractor during the recession
early in the decade.
~~~@jfiiiJ I;m~
~/3Ilii1lilll:1J~ 1Jro~o 'Wl!YiJ~
222 mil
$4 mil $4 mil
$-6 mil
Mfg& UtiL ReIllil
Disl
Tmvel Em_Agy Cons! Oth_Sv FinfRE BwI_Sv Health
Agr llng!M1l1
o~,
"'"'
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 28
o
o
o
~~[@~@UDf!
~@1o~~~
~~'1W!J1)~
I 0 nominal $~2
o cpr adjusted $30 423
$~S $~2 $~8
2~6 $2~6 $2~8 $2~3
- -
- - - - -
- -
1991
1992
1994
1995
]997
1998
1999
1996
1993
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Pay Per Worker, 1991-1999 . . .
o Temecula workers were paid an average of $22,885 in 1991. In 1999, the average rose to $31,242, an $8,357 or
36.5% gain. The 1999 average was the city's $785 million payroll divided by its 25,140 full & part time workers.
Temecula's $31,242 average pay level was very high by Inland Empire standards. More typical of the region was
the $28,812 average pay in the City of Riverside.
o Southern California prices rose 17.5% from 1991-1999. Of the $8,357 gain in average pay, this meant that
$3,994 was needed to make-up for inflation, leaving the average worker $4,364 better off in 1999 purchasing
power.
o Note that average payroll is not average worker family income. The latter often includes income from more than
one worker and sources other than employment.
Mm:m1ill1,~@'JjIA\~~~~ 0;
~~'D~o'D~
$8,357 (36.5%)
$4.364 (19.1%)
Nominal Growth
Inflation
Purchasing Power Growth
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 29
o
o
o
~~[@~@[iiJQ
~4lID,~~~~,~~
lr~1JfOO~o1J~o1J~~D
Sector 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 %91-99
Manufacturing & Utilities $30,667 $33,242 $31,112 $33,277 $37,558 $36,697 $39,741 $59,655 $55,682 81.6%
Finance, Ins., R. Estate 32,903 30,453 28,360 30,373 33,955 30,922 30,929 38,350 40,467 23.0%
Engineering & Manage 29,584 27,376 22,743 36,740 43,927 30,635 37,438 37,040 40,213 35.9%
Education 30,199 30,415 30,413 29,807 28,275 28,365 30,339 34,564 36,272 20.1%
Government 30,662 34,167 31,248 32,143 33,697 32,327 31,751 29,372 31,782 3.7%
Distribution & Transport 22,685 24,189 27,586 30,134 31,143 29,752 31,496 33,872 30,826 35.9%
Construction 21,204 23,595 23,786 24,176 26,852 27,846 24,382 24,444 27,458 29.5%
Business Services 18,731 18,434 14,937 15,813 16,775 18,753 21,797 25,973 25,959 38.6%
Health Services 19,238 18,292 19,686 20,410 21,703 22,386 21,233 24,938 25,388 32.0%
Other Services 15,093 15,304 16,907 14,487 17,687 17,854 15,811 17,395 19,069 26.3%
Retail Trade 15,052 13,625 12,802 13,607 14,869 16,080 16,533 16,790 17,908 19.0%
Agriculture 14,139 14,654 13,906 15,318 16,854 16,493 17,523 18,647 17,608 24.5%
Hotel & Amusement 8,342 11,524 10,160 10,031 10,076 12,291 14,994 15,601 15,447 85.2%
Employment Agencies 14,914 9,007 10,238 9,171 8,629 12,308 9,663 14,011 15,254 2.3%
TOT~ $22,885 $23,226 '$22,598 '$23,793 $26,209 $25,802 $25,918 $30,423 $31,242 ' 36.5%
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Average Pay Per Sector, 1991-1999 . . .
o In 1999, Temecula's best paying sectors were manufacturing & utilities ($55,682), finance, insurance & real es-
tate ($40,467), engineering & management ($40,213) and education ($36,272). The greatest 1991-1999 growth
in average pay was 85.2% in the low paying hotel & amusement sector, followed by 81.6% in manufacturing &
utilities.
o Temecula is unique in having manufacturing workers average well over $50,000. In part, this is the result of
including the high paying utility sector in the group to avoid disclosure. It also is due to the city's role as home
to biotechnology, medical and computer chip manufacturers.
o The middle tier of average pay was in the government ($31,782), distribution ($30,826), construction ($27,458),
business services ($25,959) and health ($25,388). Temecula's 1999 average pay was under $20,000 in the fast
growing employment agency ($15,254), hotel & amusement ($15,447) and retail ($17,908) sectors. This was
also true of other consumer services ($19,069) and agriculture ($17,608).
~!iffi~~!;@j'~@;'J~
~'Ilro~,/i.'nil:iil1fF.i1l,4;r~~
~
$~ $~
$~
~ ~
$27 4S8
=$~~
~ $17,908 $17.606
= = ~ $15,254
Mfg&.Util,
Eog/Mo'
G~'
Dill Consl Bus_Sv Hl:IIlth
Relllil
Tmvel
Em_^sY
Otb_Sv
As<
FWRE
Ed",
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 30
o
o
o
~[?l[@~@UiJQ
MtIMl ~o~ @fj00luiJiJS
~'\lro~o'\l~diJ~
1704
1,513
1,402 1,379 1355
1,224 1,253 1,278
1.168
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Number Firms Per Sector, 1991-1999 . . .
o The number of firms located in Temecula has risen from 1,168 in 1991 to 1,704 in 1999. That is a gain of 536
companies or 27.0%. A surge in growth can be seen from 1997 to 1999 (Exhibit 51).
o These data are relatively inaccurate as they do not include entrepreneurial firms with no wage and salary employ-
ees and small firms may be reported through accountants with addresses outside of Temecula.
o The largest number of city firms are in retail trade (314), followed by other consumer services (221), construction
(208) and distribution & transportation (150) (Exhibit 52).
o It is typical for retailing and consumer services to have the most firms as they tend to be small and grow with the
population. The city's construction sector is largely made up of smaller subcontractors. Its distribution sector is
made up of a lot of firms, but they are quite small by Inland Empire standards.
-
~~~@iJ~~~
li'~1Jro~,1J~dijm~D ,
Sector 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 %91-99
Retail Trade 219 239 232 236 255 282 267 295 314 43.4%
Other Services 119 131 149 160 183 199 168 187 221 85.7%
Construction 201 208 195 183 199 239 174 190 208 3.5%
Distribution & Transport 91 94 108 120 133 148 112 127 150 64.8%
Finance, Ins., R. Estate 91 94 89 81 105 115 105 122 146 60.4%
Business Services 75 68 79 86 97 117 101 120 135 80.0%
Manufacturing/Utilities 98 98 103 121 123 138 117 117 126 28.6%
Health Services 79 88 94 90 100 100 94 105 122 54.4%
Agriculture 82 86 92 93 94 109 98 109 111 35.4%
Engineering & Mgmt. 68 73 68 60 63 71 59 74 94 38.2%
Hotel & Amusement 30 30 29 35 33 42 38 42 47 56.7%
Employment Agencies 9 5 3 3 4 6 11 12 17 88.9%
Education 5 8 10 8 11 12 9 11 11 120.0%
Government 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 100.0%
TOTAL 1,168 1,224 1,253 1,278 1,402 1;580 1,355 1;513 1,794' 45;9%
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 31
o
o
o
m~[kQ)p@wli
I ~m~Illil~@iI~~~1
~&!l~~~~o'WliJ\l~
102
95
50
59
55
43
29
28
26
7 6
Olh_Sv
Rctail
DilIl
H"'.
Agr Mfg ~ Util. En&fMgl TfIlVcl Em_Agy
Consl
Educ:
G~'
Bus_Sv
FinIRE
Source: CA Employment Devclopm.:nt Dep~r1ment
Growth 8. Share Of Firms, 1991-1999 . . .
o Every sector of Temecula's economy added firms from 1991-1999, led by other consumer services (102) and
retailing (95), business services (60), distribution (59) and finance, insurance & real estate (55) (Exhibit 53).
o This growth of firms is not surprising. Consumer services and retailing growth reflect the surging population of
the Temecula Valley. The business services and distribution sectors are composed of companies serving the re-
gion's rapidly growing economy. The combined finance, insurance & real estate sector reflects both the rise in
population growth and the surging number of home sales.
o Though Temecula has specialized in terms of manufacturing employment and payroll, it has not specialized in
terms of the number of firms that existed in 1999 (Exhibit 54). The largest concentrations were in the same sec-
tors exhibiting rapid growth from 1991-1999. Some 18.4% of companies were in retailing and 13.0% in other
consumer services. These were followed by the 12.2% of firms that are largely subcontractors in the construction
sector and 8.8% among the smaller firms in the business serving distribution sector.
I~~@J~~~
'jj'~ 'tI~@!ffiIi\l:W, 'tI~
Other
666 ""
39.0%
Oth_Sv
221
13.0%
FinlRE
146
8.6%
Const
208
12.2%
Dist
160
8.8%
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 32
o
o
o
~~Q@~@wa
~~~~~@j~
'jj'~lI@J~,lI~ollm
15.0 14.7 14.8
13.7 14.1
12.9 12.7
11.6 11.6
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
SQlrrCe: CA Employment Development Department
Average Employment In Firms, 1991-1999. . .
o Temecula's economy is largely made up of smaller firms. The average number of workers per firm grew from
11.6 in 1991 to a high of15.0 in 1997. It has since stabilized at just under 15 workers per firm (Exhibit 55).
o In 1999, only three sectors of Temecula's economy averaged over 50 workers: education (187.0), government
(84.0) and employment agencies (81.0) (Exhibit 56).
o The balance of Temecula's economy was composed of smaller firms led by manufacturing at 46.5 workers, hotel
& amusement at 36.2 and retailing at 17.1. The distribution sector averaged 13.0 workers, far below the average
in that sector for most Inland Empire cities. For example, the figure was 27.0 in Ontario. Temecula's other sec-
tors averaged under 10 workers.
-
~~~@i]~~~
'jj'~'iJGfl~,'iJ~o'iJ~~D
Sector 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 %91-99
Education 206.5 136.7 121.7 172.3 132.8 133.6 188.0 160.2 187.0 -9.4%
Government 37.3 42.0 50.2 54.5 57.5 63.2 78.0 83.7 84.0 125.0%
Employment Agencies 20.2 81.7 78.6 137.8 61.4 22.6 67.2 116.6 81.0 301.5%
Manufacturing/Utilities 34.8 38.3 46.9 44.3 44.1 41.2 45.9 40.6 46.5 33.6%
Hotel & Amusement 7.7 9.5 15.2 12.9 12.7 19.2 31.1 38.9 36.2 369.2%
Retail Trade 12.9 13.0 15.1 17.1 16.1 15.4 17.2 16.8 17.1 32.7%
Distribution & Transport 8.9 10.7 9.0 8.2 8.8 9.6 11.1 11.6 13.0 45.9%
Agriculture 12.8 10.7 11.5 11.2 9.8 10.5 12.2 11.0 9.5 -26.4%
Construction 7.4 5.2 4.5 4.8 4.3 4.4 6.4 8.1 8.5 14.8%
Health Services 4.5 4.7 4.7 5.2 5.8 5.6 5.7 5.3 6.0 32.3%
Business Services 5.0 5.0 6.5 6.7 7.1 6.2 6.0 6.1 5.6 11.3%
Finance, Ins., Real Estate 6.0 5.7 6.5 8.3 5.8 4.8 5.3 5.2 5.3 -10.9%
Other Services 3.6 3.9 4.4 5.2 4.5 4.3 6.2 5.6 5.2 42.8%
Engineering & Mgmt 11.5 9.8 11.4 6.4 5.4 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.4 -61.6%
TOTAL 11.6 11.6 12.9 13.7 12.7 12.3 15.0' 14.7 14.8 27,0%
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 4
City of Temecula
Page 33
o
o
o
~~[@~@[JiJ(!
I ~liWo~@ff~~4
~~
Manufacturing
Retail
)1S.7%
19.0%
18.9%
lS.7%
18.2%
l8.0%
17.7%
l7.3%
6.3%
15.5%
15.3%
12.7%
11.9%
11.8%
Education
COI\!llrUCtion
Oovernment
Health
Finance, Ins., R. Eslale
Dislribution & Tmnsp.
BusincaSclVice
~rScrvicc
Utilities
Agriculture
Engineer & Mgmt
I Source: U.S. Bureau of the Censlls, 1990
Match Between Local Residents 8, Jobs ...
o In 1998, the top five sectors in which Temecula's residents had jobs, regardless of whether they worked locally or
commuted, were in manufacturing (18.7%), retailing (9.0%), education (8.9%), construction (8.7%) and govern-
ment (8.2%) (Exhibit 57).
o In terms of jobs, Exhibit 41 showed that during 1999 the largest sectors were manufacturing (23.3%), retailing
(2I.4%), education (8.2%), distribution (7.8%) and construction (7.0%). The match is a good one except in re-
tailing where there is a much higher concentration of jobs than local workers.
o The 1990 Census showed that the largest portion of Temecula's population worked in sales (18.4%), executive
jobs (15.6%), followed by skilled production and craft workers (/4.2%), professionals (13.0%) and administra-
tive support (10.9%). Of these, the share of sales workers was much higher than that found in the surrounding
counties; the share of administrative support staff including secretaries was lower (Exhibit 58).
~~~~~~
'iJ'~1J~
Occupation T emecuIa Riverside Co. S. Diego Co. San Odno. Co. Orange Co. L. A. County
Sales 1S.4% 12.8% 14.6% 12.1% 14.0% 11.6%
Executive, administrative, managerial 15.6% 11.6% 15.5% 11.8% 16.6% 13.2%
Precision production, craft & repair 14.2% 14.4% 4.4% 14.4% 10.3% 11.0%
Professional 13,0% 11.4% 13.0% 12.0% 14.8% 14.4%
Administrative support incl. secretarial 10.9% 15.0% 15.9% 16.5% 16.5% 17.4%
Other Services 8.3% 10.9% 0.7% 10.1% 9.0% 9.7%
Handlers, helpers & laborer 4.1% 4.3% 1.7% 4.7% 3.3% 4.0%
Transportati9" & material moving 4.0% 4.4% 11.0% 5.0% 2.6% 3.4%
Technician 3.8% 3.1% 2.1% 3.2% 3.6% 3.4%
Machine operators, assemblers, inspectors 3.6% 5.3% 11.1% 5.5% 5.9% 8.2%
Falming 2.6% 4.2% 3.9% 1.9% 1.5% 1.2%
Protective services 1.3% 2.0% 2.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.6%
Private household 0.3% 0.4% 3.3% 0.4% 0.6% 1.1%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100:0% 100.0% 100.0% 100:0't.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1990
Section 4
City of Temeoula
Page 34
o
o
o
u~[Q)[@ ~oo~o u[f@@}@ I
CII'II'Y ((J) IF 'II'IEMIEC1IJILA
SIEC'II'II((J)N ~
'II' AXAIffiILIE JP?IE 'II' AIIIL 'II'JRAID IE
Temecula's taxable retail sales record is the envy of most Inland Empire cities. In 1998, city sales
surged to another all time high at $923 million. Its retail trade has increased in every year since
its incorporation in 1989, even during the severe Southern California recession of the early part
of this decade (Exhibit 59). This rapid pace has continued into 1999 with the city's sales up an-
other 16.7% for the first 6-months of the year, before the opening of the Promenade Mall. Thus,
for fiscal year 98-99 (ending June 30, 1999), taxable trade reached $995 million.
Taxable Sales Growth. Temecula's retail sales growth has exceeded that of Riverside County
since its incorporation (Exhibit 60). From 1995-1999, sales have grown at double digit levels.
The 16.7% gain in early 1999, and the very successful opening of Promenade Mall late in the year
guaranteed that for all of 1999, the city's total sales exceeded the $1 billion mark for the first
time.
The city's retail sales growth has been consistently robust during the 1990s, even growing sub-
stantially during the 1991-1994 recession (4.4%-16.9%). As a result, in 1999, Temecula ranked
17th in the inland region based upon population. However, it ranked 7th in retail sales just behind
Rancho Cucamonga ($996 million) and Palm Desert ($924 million) (Exhibit 61). It should pass
these two cities now that the mall is opened.
Per Caoita Retail Sales. Given the importance of the retail sales tax to California municipalities,
taxable retail sales per capita is a good barometer of a community's ability to provide services to
its population. Temecula has fared extraordinarily well on this standard. In 1998, its per capita
sales were $19,347, an amount that was substantially higher than that of the region's seven cities
with over 100,000 people, and well above Riverside County's $9,017 level (Exhibits 62-64).
Since 1991, the city sales per capita have increased 31.9%. The level is expected to rise another
10-12% in 1999, given the strong sales during the first six months of the year and the October
opening of Promenade Mall. This will place the city's per capita sales over $21,000. Two
smaller cities with major malls had higher per capita sales than Temecula in 1998: Montclair
($26,463) and Palm Desert ($25,846).
Sectors Causing Taxable Sales Growth. From 1990-1998, Temecula's retail trade has in-
creased by $496 million or 116.1 % (Exhibits 65-66). The largest share of this gain (27.6%) came
from retail sales by non-retail outlets (up $137 million), a group including professional & ser-
vice firms, construction contractors, and manufacturing & distribution firms selling directly to the
Section 5
City of Temecula
Page 36
o
o
o
LF~[Q)[@ ~oo~O If[fID@@ I
public. This would appear to validate the city's strategy of encouraging manufacturing and dis-
tribution firms of this type.
The next largest gain (25.7%) came from sales by automotive dealers and parts suppliers (up
$127 million). General merchandise stores accounted for 16.2% of the increase (up $81 million),
and the associated "other" retailers another 11.9% (up $59 million). The first of these three
shows the city capturing more than its share of the highly competitive auto and truck market. The
other two indicate that even before the regional mall, Temecula's shoppers were tending to stay in
the city. Together, the top four growing sectors were responsible for 82% of the gain in the city's
sales.
Distribution of Trade. Between 1991 and 1998, three of Temecula's retail sectors have signifi-
cantly grown in importance. The large non-retail outlet group's share ofthe city taxable trade has
gone from 18.6% to 23.4% (Exhibits 67-68). Automotive dealers and parts houses have in-
creased their percentage from 16.2% to 21.3%. And, general merchandise stores have gone from
a 13.6% share to 15.0%. Moving in the opposite direction have been sales by "other" retail out-
lets (largely specialty shops) which fell from to 17.2% to 14.3%, and building materials suppliers
which dropped from a 6.5% to a 3.4% share. The latter is low for a community with a strong
housing market.
Retail GaDS. In seven out of ten sectors, average sales by Temecula's retail outlets did better
than. the average for Riverside County. The strongest per store performance was among general
merchandise stores ($2.4 million higher) and auto & parts dealers ($1.8 million higher) (Exhibit
69). Average sales by city outlets under-performed the county by the largest amount in the build-
ing materials sector ($1.3 million less).
Retail outlets in Temecula generally outperform those in the Inland Empire generally. Thus, the
city's average retail store had sales of $951,283. That was about $259,000 per year more than
the countywide average for outlets in Riverside County ($691,859) and in San Bernardino County
($692,221) (Exhibit 70). The city's average sales in all outlets including non-retail of $495,847
was about $100,000 more than the average for all venues in either county.
Finally, Temecula's 1998 per capita taxable sales average of$19,347 was well above the averages
for Riverside ($11,917) and San Bernardino counties ($11,997), after the latter had been adjusted
upward for the fact that the counties had significantly lower median income levels than the city
(Exhibit 71). An upward adjustment of 32.2% was made to Riverside County per capita sales, as
this was the amount by which its per capita income and purchasing power were below those of
the average Temecula resident. The adjustment was 31.1 % for San Bernardino County.
In all but two sectors, per capita sales in Temecula exceeded those for Riverside County (Exhibit
72) even after the latter were increased by the 32.2% factor. The city is, thus, a net importer of
sales and sales tax dollars overall and in nearly every part of its retail economy. The only excep-
tions were minimal drains in apparel and building materials. The Promenade Mall should elimi-
nate the apparel drain. The opening of Lowe's Home Improvement should close the gap in the
building materials sector.
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 36
o
o
o
u~[Q)[@ ~@\.@oo u[i@@@ I
~ (1Jj),o'jj'@(\1j] 'jj'~~ (!m@!)
'jj'~ ~WiIo~IDffil
$922, n2
$831,094
$752,754
$544,022
$535,735 $579,179
$512,958
$427,207
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Source: CA Board of Equalization
Total Taxable Retail Sales. . .
o In 1998, Temecula's taxable retail sales reached $923 million, another all time record. Despite Southern Califor-
nia's severe recession in the early 1990s, the city has seen an increase in its taxable sales in every year since its
1989 incorporation (Exhibit 59). During the first two quarters of 1999, Temecula's retail sales continued to in-
crease at a rapid pace even before the opening of the regional Promenade Mall. As a result, Temecula's fiscal
year 98-99 sales (ended June 1999) rose to $995 million.
o Temecula's retail sales growth has been significantly faster than that of Riverside County in every year of the
past decade. In 1998, the 11.0% growth rate was above the county's 9.8% rate (Exhibit 60). In the first six
months of 1999, the 16.7% increase was faster than the county's aggressive 14.0% gain.
~trol,o'jj'@(\1j]'jj'~~~
'jj'~t;!,~~,~~~~
o Temecula
o Riverside Cmmly
20.1%
16.9-10
16.7%
14.0%
11.2%
11.0%
10A%
9.8%
8.1%
7.9%
7.5%
5.8%
5.2%
4.4%
0.5%
1999 ytd
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999 ytd=6-months
Source: CA Board of Equalization
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 37
o
o
o
'U'~[Q)[@ ~ooao u[f@c9:@ I
~@lLo'jj'@Ojj) 'jj'~ ~ (!:OOl]D
~~~~'iJ~
$2,601,975 $2,546,092
$1,961,667
$1.283.288
$996.102 $923,979 $922.772 $847,768 $840,373 $826.382
~~ $802,661 $647.240
vi", 'l ''I ~ I I
irY,'~.
lB;~
.-& ./ .# ! iJJ ." ~ .j :-l' I '1> ;;.
.", ;J1 ~
~ f & @ (j Ii' (J t I'i ~ .>;
. 0'" of <:) ! @
<$ $I () .if ,<0 ;?
"! d' ;f ",. ,:".' ~ ,j'
0,$ "- $
""
I Source: CA Board ofEqualizalion I
Retail Sales Compared . . .
o Temecula's 1998 sales of $923 million ranked 7"' among Inland Empire retail centers just behind Rancho Cuca-
monga ($966 million) and Palm Desert ($924 million), and just above Chino ($848 million) (Exhibit 61). It ac-
complished this without a major regional retail mall. And, it did this despite having a population (48,828) that is
less than half the size of the Inland Empire major population centers. With the Promenade Mall now open, its
1999 sales may pass those of Rancho Cucamonga and Palm Desert.
o From 1991-1998, Temecula's taxable sales per capita rose from $14,663 to $19,367, up $4,684 or 31.9%. In this
period, Riverside County's per capita sales rose $1,866 or 26.1% to $9,017 (Exhibit 62).
o Temecula benefits from having per capita retail sales that were $10,330 (l14.6%) more than Riverside County in
1998. In the first 6-months of 1999, city per capita sales were up another 11.3%; the county's were up 11.5%.
~~'jj'~~~~
'jj'~~~,'iJWilo'iJ~
$22,000
I
- ~ -0- Tom""l. I
-fr Riverside County 1
----
"...----
---< ---'
'!-- ---I -
-
$20,000
$18,000
$16.000
$14,000
$12.000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
1996
1997
1998
1991
1992
1993
1994 1995
Source: CA Board of Equalization 1
Section 6
City of Tem&cula
Page 38
o
o
o
y~[Q)1@ ~oo~O y[(@@@ I
~~o'iJ'~~~~
'iJ'~~~~~@]~lJ~~lJ~lJ~
Year Ontario Corona San Bdno. Temecula R. Cuca. Fontana Moreno Vly Temecula
1991 $9,903 $8,989 $10,543 $8,725 $4,950 $6,541 $3,381 $14';663
1992 10,793 8,670 9,868 8,581 5,239 6,670 3,846 15,973
1993 10,707 8,840 9,307 8,462 5,638 6,416 4,207 15,529
1994 12,086 9,604 9,562 8,839 6,038 6,605 4,367 15,433
1995 12,245 10,163 9,650 8,836 6,681 7,028 4,478 15,876
1996 13,319 10,539 9,860 9,251 10,371 7,249 4,423 17,586
1997 15,919 10,942 10,019 9,564 11,175 6,798 4,472 18,403
1998 17,578 11,218 10,675 10,304 8,291 7,525 4,686 19,347
1991-1998 77.5% 24.8% 1.3% 18.1% 67.5% 15.0% 38.6% 31.9%
Source: CA Board of Equalization; CA Department of Finance
Taxable Retail Sales Per Capita. . .
o Given the importance of retail sales to city finances, sales per capita are a key measure of a municipality's ability
to provide services to its population. They give an estimate of the purchasing power per resident that this tax
supplies to the city.
o From \99\-\998, Temecula's per capita sales increased by 31.9%. Among the large cities, the big percentage
gainers were Ontario (77.5%), Rancho Cucamonga (67.5%) and Moreno Valley (38.6%). The latter three have
seen large malls open during the decade (Exhibit 63).
o Temecula's \998 per capita retail sales of $19,347 were larger than all of the Inland Empire's cities with over
\ 00,000 people. Ontario had the highest sales per capita of these major cities at $\7,578. Two smaller cities
with major malls, however, had higher per capita sales than Temecula: Montclair at $26,463 and Palm Desert at
$25,864 (Exhibit 64).
o Per capita retail sales were calculated by dividing total retail sales by the average January 1, \998 and \999
populations.
I ~Mo'\i'~~ifuli'~'\1Mjl
~1Ui:IID:ml~~~
$26,463 $26,864
$19,347
$17,678
$11,218 $10,676 $10,304
$8,291 $7,525
$4,685
I I
Montclair Palm Desert Temecula Ontario Corona San Bdno. Riverside R. Cuca.
I Source: CA Board of Equalization
Fontana Moreno Vly
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 39
o
o
o
lJ~[Q)(@ ~ooOO u((@~ I
I ~ffio'jj'~~~~~
'jj'~lI~o'\J~
Sector 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Change
Apparel $13,509 $13,215 $14,232 $14,854 $14,702 $15,668 $17,045 $19,592 $6,083
General Merch. 57,966 93,587 98,525 104,621 106,623 110,635 122,307 138,502 80,536
Food Stores 29.748 29,654 25,205 25,971 28,805 31,914 34,674 37,966 8,218
Eating & Drink 39,204 38,635 48,011 53,980 58,081 64,960 72,095 78,423 39,219
Furniture 11,521 11,335 6,424 10,303 10,760 13,888 16,144 21,761 10,240
Bldg.Malerial 27,890 19,633 19,104 18,807 18,861 21,598 26,417 31,313 3,423
Automotive 69,231 89,864 94,884 122,753 134,866 159,062 168,686 196,744 127,513
Senrice Stations 25,240 29,341 36,488 39,108 45,283 49,666 56,429 50,115 24,875
Other Retail 73,477 80,060 62,902 70,127 77,822 99,266 120,288 132,395 58,918
Total Retail $347,786 $405,324 $405,775 $460,524 $495,803 $566,657 $634,085 $706,811 $359,025
Non-Retail 79,241 116,644 126,960 118,655 148,219 186,097 197,009 215,961 136,720
Total AU Outlets $427,027 $621,968 $532,735 $579,179 $644,022 $762,754 $831,094 $922,772 $495,745
Source: CA Board of Equalization, Economics & Politics, Inc.
Retail Sales By Sector. . .
o In the period of 1991-1998, Temecula's retail sales grew by $496 million (116.1%), from $427 million to a re-
cord $923 million (Exhibit 65). Four sectors combined to account for 82% of Temecula's retail sales increase:
non-retail (27.6%), automotive (25.7%), general merchandise (l 6. 2%) and "other" retail (11.9%).
o From 1991-1998, $137 million (27.6%) of Temecula's retail sales growth occurred in non-retail outlets (Exhibit
66). These include retail sales by professionals & service firms, construction contractors, and industrial & distri-
bution firms selling directly to the public. The group also ranked first in 1998 city retaii sales at $216 million.
o Temecula's automotive sector was responsible for the second largest share of the $496 million gain in retail sales,
up $128 million (25. 7%). In 1998, these outlets were also the second largest in total sales at $128 million.
o General merchandise stores and the associated "other" retailers were the other sectors accounting for significant
shares of Temecula's sales tax increase at $81 million (l6.2%) and $59 million (l1.9%) respectively. In the fu-
ture, Temecula's general merchandise, apparel and "other" retail sectors will receive a major boost now that the
Promenade Mall is a reality.
$136,720
$127,613
~(j@.,o~~~~~
~~W1Io\l~ (!ll!mJ
$80,636
$&8,918
$39,219
. . .....
Teri1eeula Tai.ableSales grew over
5496 million from 1991-1998(116;1 'Vo)
,.
$24,875
r II $10,240 I $8,218
$6,083
$3,423
Non-Retail AulOmotive Gen. Merch. Other Retail Eat &. Drink SelV. Station Furniture Food Stores Apparel Bldg. Maler.
I Source: CABoardorEqualiZlltion I
Section 5
Page 40
City of Temecula
o
o
o
1Y~[Q)[@ ~@ili)~O lJ(ffi)@)@ I
l~w"'~~~~1
lTh:JIIIYOUfF.'l 0 'OOID1) ~
Gene..al Merchandisll
$5?9611l
13.6%
Apparel
$~3.509
3.2%
Furniture & AIJplicunccs
$~~.5:n
2.7%
Non-Retail
$?9.2lil~
18.6%
Other Retail
$n.lil??
17.2%
Auto Dealers & Supplies
$69.23~
16.2%
I Source: CA Board of Equalization
Share of Retail Sales... Then (1991) & Now (1998)
o The rapid $137 million growth of sales in Temecula's non-retail outlets moved the sector group from a leading
18.6% of sales in 1991, to 23.4% in 1998. As indicated, the sector accounted for 27.6% of the growth in trade
during this period (Exhibits 67-68).
o In 1991, new & used automobile dealers and automotive parts outlets were the third largest retail sector account-
ing for 16.2% of Temecula's sales. By 1998, the group had moved up to being the second most important sector,
responsible for 21.3% of sales. In the interim, the sector supplied 25.7% of the city's retail sales growth.
o General merchandise stores moved from the fourth to the third most important source of retail sales between
1991-1998, as the share rosefrom 13.6% to 15.0%.
o While "other" retail stores were an important source of retail sales growth, their share fell from 17.2% of sales to
14.3%, and there position slipped from second to fourth. The only other sector with a significant change was
building materials which slipped from 6.5% to 3.4% of sales. This should improve with the opening of Lowe's
Home Improvement.
Service Stations
$25.2lilO
5.9%
Building Materials & Farm
$2? .B90
6.5%
Food Stores
$29. ?lilB
7.0%
Eating & Drinking
$39.2Dlil
9.2%
Food Stores
$3?911l1ll
4.1%
Service Stations
$50.n5
5.4%
Ealing & Drinking
$?B.':l2:!1
8.5%
Other Retail
$1:!I2.:!I!ll5
14.3%
General Merchandise
$UB.502
15.0%
1~(OO,o~~~~1
'ifuJliI9!l~o'1!\OO13(1:OOXffi
Building Mllterials & Farm
$:!I~.:!IU
3.4%
Furniture & Applicanccll
$2~. ?1Il~
2.4%
Non_Retail
$2~5.!ll1ll'
23.4%
Auto Dealers & Supplies
$~911l.?""
21.3%
Section 5
City of Temecula
Page 41
o
o
o
lJ~[Q)[@ ~oom u[jID(Q]@ [
( ~@l!lo~~li'~~~~~~
li'~~&'.irnil~~1J~
,
Temecula Riverside County San Bernardino County
Sector Per Outlet Per Outlet Temecula-RV Per Outlet Temecula-
Apparel $425,913 $486,588 ($60,675) $439,446 ($13,533)
General Merchandise $6,295,545 3,904,434 2,391,111 4,001,361 2,294,185
Food Stores $1,581,917 899,086 682,830 754,672 827,244
Eatiog & Drinking $544,604 433,135 111,469 416,964 127,640
Furniture & Appliances $302,236 351,637 (49,401 ) 349,462 (47,226)
BIding Materials & Fann $1,043,767 2,305,441 (1,261,674) 1,756,069 (712,303)
Auto Dealers & Supplies $3,577,164 1,736,283 1,840,881 1,544,686 2,032,477
Service Stations $2,088;125 1,716,996 371,129 1,768,037 320,088
Other Retail $406,120 232,230 173,890 277,900 128,220
Total Retail $951;293 $691,859 $259,434 $692,221 $259,072
Non-Retail $193,167 191,165 2,002 203,686 (10,519)
Total All Outlets $495,847 $390,829 $105,018 $383,769 $112,078
Source: CA Board of Eaualization. Economic & Politics. Inc.
Retail Sales Per Outlet. . .
o Temecula's sales per outlet exceeded Riverside County in 7 of 10 sectors: generai merchandise, eating & drink-
ing; food,; automotive; service stations; and non-retail outlets. The exceptions were apparel, furniture & appli-
ances and building materials. The opening of the Promenade Mall should address the furniture and apparel sec-
tors. The opening of Lowe's Home Improvement should increase the average sales by building material outlets
(Exhibit 69).
o Temecula's general merchandise outlets exceeded the Riverside County average for such stores by $2.4 million.
Its automotive outlets had a $1.8 million edge. The greatest weakness was in the building materials sector where
city outlets had sales that were $1.3 million less than the countywide average for such outlets.
o Overall, Temecula's 1998 sales per retail outlet averaged $951,283 well above the average for Riverside
($692,2213) and San Bernardino ($69/,859) counties (Exhibit 70). The same was true of its average sales for all
outlets including non-retail stores. They averaged $495,847 per outlet about $100,000 above the average for all
venues in each of the two counties.
I ~7M\,o'jj'@jjjj]~~~~
'jj'~~~o~~~lI\ilillJ
$951,293 o Total Rclllil
o All OullelS
$692,221 $691 859
$495,847
.. ;t""f"";"'1 .."
, $383,769 $390,829
.. .. .,
..
., "
" ..
-d/..-___ .,,,,'
Temecula
S. Bernardino Co.
Riverside Co.
Source: CA Boaro of Equalization
Section 5
City of Temee"la
Page 42
o
o
o
u~[ID[@ ~@\@no U[ff;)cQ}@ I
c
, MlTh'll711J,o'jj'~~ ~~~~
, 'jj'~m~~~~~'\J~
~ u
Temecula Riverside County! San Bernardino County2
Sector Sales Per Capita Sales Per Capita Temecula. Sales Per Canita Temecula-S8
Apparel $411 $452 ($42) $350 $60
General Merchandise $2,904 $1,476 $1,427 $1,517 $1,387
Food Stores $796 $688 $108 $625 $171
Eating & Drinking $1,644 $1,014 $630 $926 $718
Furniture & Appliances $456 $334 $123 $247 $209
Building Materials & Fann $657 $905 ($249) $629 $27;
Auto Dealers & Supplies $4,125 $1,655 $2,470 $1,600 $2,525
Service Stations $1,051 $719 $331 $758 $293
Other Retail $2,776 $1,169 $1,607 $1,325 $1,450
Total Retail $14,819 $8,412 $6,407 $7,977 $6,842
Non-Retail $4,528 $3,504 $1,023 $4,020 $507
Total All Outlets $19,347 $11,917 $7,430 $11,997 $7,350
Note: San Bernardino County data increased 31.1 % and Riverside County increased 32.2% for Brnotmt their median in-
comes are below that ofTemecuIa..
Source: CA Board of Equalization, CA Department of Finance, Economic & Politics, Inc.
Retail Sales Gap By Sector. . .
o Temecula's 1998 per capita taxable sales average of $19,347 was weil above the averages for Temecula
($11,917) and San Bernardino Counties ($11,997), after the latter had been adjusted upward for the fact that the
counties had significantly lower median income levels than the city (Exhibit 71).
o Upward adjustments to the Temecula (32.2%) and San Bernardino County (31.1%) per capita sales data were
made in order to ailow for the fact that Temecula's median family income, and, thus, resident purchasing power
is higher than the region. After these adjustments, where city per capita sales exceed county sales, the city is
gaining retail sales and sales taxes from other jurisdictions. The reverse is also true.
o Temecula's major per capita sales advantages were in the automotive ($2,470), other retail ($,1,607) general
merchandise ($1.427) and non-retail outlets ($1,023). The only sales loss "gaps" existed in the building materials
(-$249) and apparel (-$42) categories. The opening of the Promenade Mail and Lowe's Home Improvement
should close both of these gaps (Exhibit 72).
I ~~~@!Ul~~ I
~(fl1ml)~~, ~w.;J
$2470
$1607 $1,427
$1,023
$630
I I, $331
l $123 $108
($42) I
1$2491
Automotive
Olb"
Gen. Merch. Non-Retail Eati/Drink Serv, Station Furniture
Food
Apparel Bldg. Mater.
Note: Riverside Counly data increQ!led 32.2% for amount its median income is below that ofTemecula
Source: CA Board ofEqualiZlllion, CA Department ofFinallce, Ecollomic It Politics, Inc.
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 43
o
o
o
o~~~~o~@@o~~!
CCJI1f1{ ((])JF 1fJEMJECClUJLA
SJECC1fJI((])N (fi)
JINIDlUS1fJl<?JIAJL BAJL JE~1f A 1fJE
From 1994 to March 2000, the real estate industry reports that Temecula's location advantages
have caused at least 30 medium sized firms to move to, or expand within the city. Not counting
secondary impacts, these companies have or will eventually add 2,487 jobs to the community's
economic base (Exhibit 82-84). All but three of these firms are manufacturers. They make prod-
ucts such as medical devices, semi-conductors, and communications equipment.
Six of these 30 operations have migrated to Temecula from either Los Angeles, Orange or San
Diego counties. The balance moved to the city from elsewhere in the Inland Empire, or were in
Temecula and acquired new space for expansion. They are located in Temecula as the city has a
beautiful location, affordable land, modern space, and a well-educated labor force willing to work
for less to avoid long commutes. The city also offers companies uncongested access to logistics
centers such as the Ontario International Airport, Consolidated Freight's regional hub in Mira
Lorna, and BN-Santa Fe's Intermodal Rail Yard in San Bernardino. Importantly, the city is lo-
cated on the 1-15 corridor equidistant from San Diego and Orange counties.
Inland EmDire Market. Temecula is part of the Inland Empire industrial market, the second
strongest industrial real estate market in the United States behind suburban Chicago. In 1999, the
inland region's gross space absorption of 26.1 million square feet was a record, surpassing the
previous high of 18.0 million feet absorbed in 1998 (Exhibit 73). The total inventory of industrial
space in the Inland Empire is now about 220 million square feet. In Southern California, this is
second only to Los Angeles County's 860 million.
Total SDace. In April 2000, Coldwell Banker estimated that Temecula had 7.8 million square
feet of strictly manufacturing & distribution space, representing 3.3% of the Inland Empire's in-
ventory (Exhibit 74). Within the inland region, it is the community making the transition from a
small to a mid-sized market. Temecula's inventory of industrial space rises to 9,904,065 square
feet if multi-tenant sites are included in its total. The city's inventory has increased 58.4% from
the 6.25 million square feet of industrial space that existed in 1990 (Exhibit 75).
Vacant SDace & Vacancy Rates. In April 2000, Temecula's industrial space vacancy rate was
10.8% (Exhibit 76). The highest rate was 21.5% in the 50,000 to 99,999 category, followed by
16.2% in the 5,000-14,999 group. The vacancy rate was in the mid-6% range for the highly
sought after 100,000 plus group, as well as the 15,000-24,999 and multi-tenant categories. So
Section 6
City of Temeculad
Page 44
o
o
o
001l@]QD@~O ~@@O ~~ I
far, a lack of sites is not limiting the city's ability to draw new firms and jobs. However, the low
vacancy rate among large buildings requires a watchful eye from city leaders.
In an Inland Empire context, the 848,291 square feet of available industrial space in Temecula
ranked 10th largest in the Inland Empire market behind San Bernardino (1,201,658) and ahead of
Colton (411,020). Nearby, Corona had 2,469,569 square feet available; Moreno Valley-Perris
had just 7,090 (Exhibit 77).
From 1992 to 1999, the rush of firms into the Inland Empire reduced Temecula's industrial va-
cancy rate from 14.0% to 6.6% before it rose to 10.8% as new space became available. The be-
havior of the city's vacancy rate has mirrored the growing tightness in Inland Empire markets
generally, where unoccupied space fell from 21.3% to 7.5% before rising with the production of
new space. In April 2000, the city's 10.8% vacancy rate ranked 9'h, in the middle of the 18 sub-
markets of the inland region (Exhibit 78). The highest rates were in Pomona (18.2%) and Mira
Lorna (17.1%), the latter due tocontinuing new construction. Corona's vacancy rate was 11.0%;
the Moreno Valley-Perris rate was effectively non-existent at 0.6%.
Lease Rates. Grubb & Ellis estimates that Temecula's industrial space has an average lease rate
of$0.39 per square foot per month (net afinsurance, taxes and common area fees). This is lower
than the rates found in all of Southern California's coastal sub-markets. For instance, the average
in San Diego County's Escondida and Vista markets is 29% higher at $0.55 (Exhibit 79). Within
the Inland Empire, Temecula's $0.39 rate is above the $0.33 per square foot average for the re-
gion. The nearest costs are found in Corona at $0.37 and Fontana and Chino at $0.35 (Exhibits
80-81).
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 45
o
o
o
30,000.000
25,000,000
20,000.000
15,000.000
10,000.000
5,000.000
O[)\)@]C\I@Wf\@O ~@(;)O ~~ I
~mlo~~~~)).,~~
~~'tI~o'\JOO
o
/
1/
I/j'\ II
L-
1/
"\ ]-{ ""'
1991
1992
1993
1994 1995 1996
I SoW"ce: Lee & Associates I
1997
1998
1999
2000
Total Industrial Space Available. . .
o The Inland Empire industrial real estate market, of which the City of Temecula is a part, is among the
strongest in the United States. Industrial space absorption by manufacturers and distributors has soared
since 1996 (Exhibit 73). Each point on the graph shows the amount of space taken in the 4-quarters
ended at that point. This is done to smooth out quarterly fluctuations. For the 4-quarters ended at 4"'
quarter 1999, gross absorption was 26.1 million feet, up from 18.0 million for the 4-quarters ended at 4"'
quarter 1998.
o Altogether, the Inland Empire industrial market had a total of 237 million square feet of total. Of this,
7.8 million square feet were located in Temecula (3.3%). This includes sites with over 5,000 square feet
(Exhibit 74). The city's share of space ranks 10'" behind the market's largest cities. Its inventory is the
largest among the smaller city markets. If multi-tenant sites are included, the city's inventory is
9,904,065.
Ontario
Corona
Riverside
Chino
R Cucamonga
Fontana
Mira Lorna
Pomona
San Bel1l!lrdino
Temecula
Colton
Rialto
San Dimas
Redlands
Upland
Montclair
La Verne
Moreno Valley
~7Jao~~~o~~
'ii'~~~~~~~'tIOO
63,261,682
22,514,913
21,762,980
21,233,220
20,264,997
17,351,621
17,040,819
13,035,685
12,857,921
7,840,407
4,915,181
3,324,192
3,250,791
2,160,287
1,902,468
1,600,904
1,438,968
1,171,521
o Sources: Coldwell Banker for Temecula
Lee & Associates for other areas
Note: Temeculll. data for April 2000
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 46
o
o
o
O[ji)@](\[@~O ~@@O ~~ I
~w.,o~~~
'jj'~'iJ~
9,500,000 9,900.000
8,200.000 8.450.000
7,000.000 7.000,000 7,152,500 7,152,500
6.250.000 6,300,000
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
I Source: Marly Smith, Coldwell Banker
Industrial Space Available. . .
o Temecula is a city that proves the axiom that quality of life is a key factor in luring high technology companies.
Its beautiful location, thoughtful industrial marketing policies, and position on the 1-15 freeway equidistant from
San Diego and Orange Counties, has allowed it to draw upscale manufacturing firms that might otherwise have
located in coastal counties or in more intensely urbanized areas of the Inland Empire.
o From 1990-1999, Coldwell Banker estimates that the city's total inventory of industrial space has climbed from
6.25 million to 9.9 million square feet. That represents a 58.4% increase (Exhibit 75). Of this space, the largest
share was 3,652,727 square feet in the highly sought after 100,000 plus square foot category (Exhibit 76). In
April 2000, 238,318 square feet of this space was available. This represented 24.3% of the available space and a
vacancy rate of 6.5%. The next largest share of inventory was among multi-tenant buildings. They included
2,063,658 square feet of space, with 132,791 vacant or a 6.4% vacancy rate. In the 50,000-99,999 foot category
that is needed by a lot of medium size high technology and manufacturing firms, the city has 1,097,407 square
feet of space. Of this 235,760 is available or a 21.5% vacancy rate.
o Temecula has a 9.9% vacancy rate for all of its potential industrial locations, 10.8% if only strictly industrial
buildings are included. In tmlay's tight economy, these are average levels for the market place. Vacant space is
an advantage for a city as it means there are places to immediately put firms that are interested in the community.
I: Ml'Ml7i@.,~~o~~ 'jj'~~~
II
Size Range Base Distribution Available Distribution Availability Rate
Multi~Tenant 2,063,658 20.8% 132,791 13.5% 6.4%
5,000-14,999 1,269,200 12.8% 205,926 21.0% 16.2%
15,000-24,999 908,307 9.2% 57,374 5.8% 6.3%
25,000-49,999 912,766 9.2% 110,913 11.3% 12.2%
50,000-99,999 1,097,407 11.1% 235,760 24.0% 21.5%
100,000 Plus 3,652,727 36.9% 238,318 24.3% 6.5%
Total 9,904,065 100.0% 981,082 100.0% 9.9%
Without Multi 7,840,407 848,291 10.8%
Source: Coldwell Banker, Marty Smith
Section 6
City of Tamecuia
Page 47
o
o
o
o@~M@~o~@@o~~1
@l:ilifijIJW~~~~~
~&.Ili1lmI!l~~~~~\jW
Ontario
Rancho Cue
Mira Loma
Corona
Pomona
Chino
Fontana
Riverside
San Bernardino
Temecu\a
Colton
Upland
Rialto
Redlands
Montclair
La Verne
San Dimas
Moreno Valley
1 8,959,188
2,908,698
2,906,001
2,469,569
2,368,429
12.131,791
1.953,980
1,742,947
11,201,658
~w. 848,291
~11,020
233,923
144,048
126,489
93,586 o Sources: Coldwell Banker for TemecuJII
49,398 Lee & t\JIsocillles for other IlfIlIl!l
48,970 Note: TemeculadataforApril2000
7,090
Industrial Vacancy Rate. . .
o The accelerating migration of manufacturing & distribution firms to the Inland Empire Market has caused the
area's industrial space vacancy rates to plummet. As a result, Coldwell Banker estimates that Temecula's indus-
trial vacancy rate fell from 14.0% to 10.8% between 1992-1999, with the city attracting an unusual number of
technology firms. Meanwhile, Grubb & Ellis indicates the Inland Empire market fell from 21.3% to 8.0%.
o Using data from Coldwell Banker and Lee & Associ8tes, Temecula's 848,291 square feet of available industrial
space was the lOth largest in the Inland Empire market behind San Bernardino (1,201,658) and ahead of Colton
(411,020). Nearby, Corona had 2,469,569 square feet available; Moreno Valley-Perris had just 7,090.
o Temecula's 10.8% vacancy rate would place it 9th among the 18 Inland Empire sub-markets. The highest vacan-
cies were found in Pomona (18.2%) and Mira Lorna (17. 1 'Yo), the latter due to continuing new construction. In
nearby markets, Corona's vacancy rate was 11.0%, and the Moreno Valley-Perris rate was 0.6%. Having idle
space is a positive factor for a city like Temecula with newer facilities. Otherwise, low vacancy rates would in-
hibit the migration of new firms and jobs to the community.
~W1o&~~~~~1i!iliIiIMl
~&'Il:iifiilliI!I~Ii!iliIiIMl~~~(OOl)
8.2%
17.1%
o Sources: Coldwell Banker for Temcculll
Lee & As50ciales for other IlrellS
14.4%14.2%
12.3%12.1%
11.3%110" 10 8"
. /0 . 10100"
. 10 9.3%
Note: Temeculll dalll for April 2000
8.4% 8.0%
5.9% 5.8%
0.6%
if ./ 0.4 .f . .# .f l l I I s. .t ! ~ ,; l I I'
I ::,.Q ,# ~ II ;; "
~~'" 0/ d' ,,' '<i d' rJ ,,# J' 0 If' d' '" "
. :I ~ ... '" 'f .J ~Q l
I of 'f
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 48
o
o
o
O[iiJ@]ru:@~O ~@@O ~~ I
~~~~~
~~~1l~
Orange~South
San Diego.Vista
Orange-Airport
San Diego-San Marcos
San Diego-Escondida
San Fernando
Orange-West
San Gabriel
Orange-Cent.
Orange-North
Mid Cities
LA-Central
South Bay
Temecula
$0.60
$0.60
$0.67
$0.66
$0.66
$0.64
$0.62
$0.61
$0.48
$0.44
$0.42
$0.41
$0.40
$0.39 I 0 Source: Grubb & Ellis I
, :-'~,;~ &, :_,:,1~.tj~'f.;
Industrial Lease Rates (NNN) . . .
o In 1999, Temecula's industrial space leasing rate averaged $0.39 a square foot per month according to Grubb &
Ellis (net of insurance, taxes and common area fees). The city's space is relatively inexpensive by Southern
California standards, with costs below those of every sub-market in the coastal counties. The rate compares to
$0.55 in nearby San Marcos and Escondido, a 29% savings for firms moving to the city.
o On the other hand, Temecula's $0.39 lease rate is relatively expensive compared to other Inland Empire loca-
tions. Thus, industrial space in Corona is leasing for an average of $0.37 per square foot, 5.1 % less expensive. In
the City of Riverside, it is 23.1% cheaper at $0.30 per square foot.
~&ill,~~~
Ill\llIDXSJ ~ ~o '\J~
TemecuJa " ., --,- 'lSO.39
'..
Corona Iso.37
Fontana/Chino Iso.35
Montclair/Upland Iso.33
Inland Empire SO.33
Ontario/Mira loma/R. Cuea. Iso.32
Redlands/San Bdno ISO.31
Riverside ISO.3O
Colton & Rlalto l SO.29
Perrls/Moreno Valley Iso.28
Vlaor Valley l SO.27 \ 0 Source: Grubb & Ellis \
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 49
o
o
o
o@~@@~o~@@o~~1
~@\]o~~~
'jj'~@;7~~~
$0.50-$0.55
$0.45-$0.50 $0.45-$0.48 $0.48-$0.50
$0.42-$0.45 $0.42-$D.45
Multi-Tenant
5,000-14.999
15.000-24.999
25,000-49.999
50,000-99,999
100.000 Plus
Source: Marty Smilh, Coldwell Banker
Lease Rates By Size Range. . .
o By category, Coldweli Banker finds that most space in the city is leasing for $0.42-$0.55 per square foot. The
larger spaces from 50,000 square feet or higher are leasing for $0.42 to $0.45 per square foot (Exhibit 81).
Firms Migrating ...
o From 1994 to March 2000, 30 firms have undertaken significant expansions in Temecula (See list next page).
Six have come from outside the Inland Empire. The other 24 have involved expansions within the city or com-
panies moving from elsewhere inside the region. These firms are moving to Temecula because of its physical
beauty and its location being equidistant between the San Diego and Orange County Markets along the 1-15
freeway. Once in the city, they find an educated labor force wiliing to work for less to avoid commuting long
distances. This fact represents a powerful potential market tool for the city.
o These 30 firms accounted for 2,487 new jobs upon making their moves. Of these, 27 were manufacturers that
added 2,375 jobs when their facilities opened. This is an average of 88 workers per firm. It is higher than the
average of 72 workers for ali new Inland Empire manufacturers. The city's manufacturers are relatively smali us-
ers of space averaging 734 square feet per worker, compared to an Inland Empire average of 957 (Exhibit 82).
~~~~ - . o~M~'iJ~'\I~o~
Secto r Firms Percent Jobs Workers Percent Workers/Firm
Manufacturing 27 90.0% Manufacturing 2,375 95.5% 88.0
Distribution 1 3.3% Distribution 80 3.2% 80.0
Service 2 6.7% Service 32 1.3% 16.0
Gov!. Aoencies 0 0.0% Govt. Aoencies 0 0.0% NA
Total gJ!) ~ Total ~ ~ fim)
Source Finns Percent Other Square Feet Percent FeetIWorker
Migrate from LNOR 6 20.0% Manufacturing 1,742,704 97.1% 734
New Growth Q 0.0% Distribution 0 0.0% NA
New To Inl. Emoire 6 20.0% Service 52,000 2.9% 1,625
Exnand Locan. 24 80.0% Govt. Aoencies 0 0.0% NA
Total gJ!) ~ Total ~"l1OO,W)3 ~ ~
Source: Coldwell Banker, CB Corrunercial, Grubb & Ellis, Cushman Wakefield, Lee & Assoc., Collins Fuller, IEE?
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 50
o
o
o
o@~~~o~@@o~~\
~&!J., o. offiYOl~Wl~ 'jJ~1J~~
Sector Name Firms Workers WorkerslFirm Souare Feet Feet oer Worker
Medical 7 721 103.0 479,582 665
Semi-Conductor 5 692 138.4 236,713 342
Metal Fabricating 3 III 37.0 125,000 1,126
Home Products 3 105 35.0 209,918 1,999
Plastic Injection 2 159 79.5 149,240 939
Software 2 32 16.0 52,000 1,625
Furniture I 29 28.6 45,000 1,573
Sport 1 200 200.0 118,000 590
Machinery & Equip I 20 20.0 17,450 873
Aerospace, Defense 1 3 3.0 NA NA
Paper I 135 135.0 117,000 867
Filter 1 45 45.0 112,000 2,489
Building Material I 155 155.4 132,800 854
Distribution I 80 80.0 NA NA
TOTAL 30 2,487 82.9 1,794,704 722
Firms II/ligrating Or Expanding. . .
o The firms either migrating to or expanding in Temecula since 1994 have been in 14 sectors with multiple expan-
sions in the medical, semi-ccnductor, metai fabricating, home products, plastics, and software sectors.
o A look at the list shows the highest ccncentration of high technoiogy firms found anywhere in the Inland Empire
region (Exhibit 84). They range from Guidant's expansion that opened with 350 workers to the movement of the
headquarters operation of Laser Power Corporation which added the firm's top three executives.
~@a o. 0 o~~~~'jJ~1J~~
Firm From Date So/Ft. New Jobs Tvoe Sector
Guidant Feb-99 100.000 350 Exoand Medical
Magnecomp Group Brea Mar-96 100,660 300 Migrate Semi-Conductor
Zevo Golf Co. Vista Sep-96 118,000 200 Migrate Sport
International Rectifier Sep-96 30,000 170 Expand Semi-Conductor
Mil~ard Manufacturin~ Au~-99 132,800 155 Expand Buildin~ Material
International Rectifier May-95 40,000 150 Expand Semi-Conductor
Tension Envelope Corp. Santa Fe Sprin~s Jul-94 117,000 135 Migrate Paper
Chemican International, Inc. Nov-99 54,000 125 Expand Medical
Channell Commercial Sep-96 99,840 100. Expand Plastic
Professional Hospital Supply Jun-99 0 80 Expand Distribution
Hudson RCI Nov-99 100,000 70 Expand Medical
Chemican International, Inc. May-99 58,000 69 Expand Medical
Channell Commercial Jun-94 49,400 5.9 Expand Plastic
Burkey Machine & Tool Nov-99 16,000 54 Expand Metal Fabricate
Professional Hospital Supply Jun-95 50,000 50 Expand Medical
Optical Disc Media Santa Clarita Jun-99 30,000 50 Migrate Semi~Conductor
Finova Medical Systems Sep-96 40,000 48 Expand Medical
Hydro-Flow Filtration Systems May-97 112,000 45 Expand Filter
Milgard Manufacturing, Inc. Nov-98 65,000 45 Expand Home Products
Amscam, Inc. Jun-95 98,918 40 Expand Home Products
Channell Commercial Dec-97 92,000 40 Expand Metal Fabricate
C&H Manufacturing Jan-99 45,000 29 Expand Furniture
Plant Equipment, Inc. Jul-96 36,053 22 Expand Semi-Conductor
Plant Equipment Inc. Feb-OO 45,000 20 Expand Software
Solid State Stamping Feb-99 17,450 20 Expand Machinery & Equip
Toy Box Creations Poway Feb-99 46,000 20 Migrate Home Products
Four Slide Engineering Nov-99 17 ,000 17 Expand Metal Fabricate
Zone Automation May-99 7,000 12 Expand Software
FFF Euterprise Sep-96 77,582 10 Expand Medical
Laser Power Corn. La Jolla Mar-DO 0 3 Mil!l1lte AerosnacelDefense
Source: Coldwell Banker, CB Commercial, Grubb & Ellis, Cushman Wakefield, Lee & Assoc., Collins Fuller, IEEP
Section 6
City of TeR18cula
Page 51
o
o
o
@(Y]@O~ @lJ [L~ \
CJI1I'1{ ([J) JF 1I'IEMIEC1UILA
SIEC1I'JI([J)N I
~ 1U AILJI1I'1{ ([J) JF ILJIJFIE
Temecula's residents enjoy one of the finest life styles in Southern California. Their children are
at or near the top on nearly every measure of educational achievement for Riverside County. The
city has developed an extensive array of parks and recreational programs. It has the lowest crime
rate among the Inland Empire's major cities. In addition, Temecula is unique for an inland com-
munity in that an ocean sea breeze makes its way to it through a gap in the mountains. As a re-
sult, the city has a moderate climate and the area is home to fifteen wineries noted for their fine
varietals.
Education. Most of Temecula's young people attend classes in the Temecula Valley Unified
School District. In academic year 1999-2000, this district was Riverside County's 7th largest with
17,499 pupils (Exhibit 85). The district's high school students had a completion rate of95.5% in
1998, second best in Riverside County (latest available data). The level was higher than either
the Riverside County (89.5%) or California (87.0%) averages (Exhibit 88).
Of the Temecula Class of 1998, 21.9% completed college preparatory classes for the University
of California-Cal State University systems (Exhibit 89). This was down from 25.9% in 1997 and
below the average for Riverside County (29.2%). The California average was 36.0%. In 1999,
40.0% of Lake Elsinore's seniors took the Scholastic Assessment Test. Their average score was
1,021, highest in Riverside County and above San Diego County and California (Exhibit 90).
Riverside County's average was 949. It was 1,016 in San Diego County and 1,011 in the state.
Like the city, Temecula's school population is somewhat diversified. Whites represent 71.3% of
the student body, the 2nd highest share in Riverside County. Hispanics make-up 17.2%, the low-
est in the county (Exhibit 86). At the same time, 4.3% of the district's students were Black, low
for Riverside County. Asian-American students made up 5.7%, about average for the county's
districts (Exhibit 87). Temecula's student body is generally far less diverse than that of Califor-
nia.
On an achievement basis, the Temecula district's students tested near the top for students in Riv-
erside County's major districts on the 1999 Stanford-9 tests that are administered to all 2nd to 11th
graders. Using 5th graders as an example of elementary school students, and omitting students
with English Language problems, the district's mean scaled scores ranked I st in spelling and 2nd
to the Murrieta district in reading, math and language (Exhibits 91-92). Using 10th graders as an
example of high school students, among 11 high school districts, city students tied for 1 st in read-
ing and language. They tied for 2nd in social science and 3,d in math, and ranked 3,d in science
(Exhibits 93-94). In every case, the city's students scored above the county average and were ei-
Section 7
City 01 lemecula
Page 62
o
I @lliJ@OOOy; @a LLEmi I
ther just above or just below California averages. [Note: Mean scaled scores are compiled by al-
lowing for the differences in the difficulty of questions posed to students, and finding the mean of
these weighted scores for students tested in a district, county and the state.]
Temecula's residents and business leaders have ready access to a large array of private and public
colleges & universities (Exhibits 95-96). Altogether, there are 22 campuses with a combined en-
rollment of over 139,000 students in the area. The list includes nationally known private, liberal
arts schools like the Claremont Colleges and the University of Redlands. Impressive scientific
work is being conducted at Harvey Mudd College, California State Polytechnic University at
Pomona, and the University of California, Riverside. Lorna Linda University boasts one of the
top medical schools in the world. The University of La Verne School of Law is locating in On-
tario. California State University San Bernardino has an excellent School of Business. Cal State
San Marcos in nearby San Diego County offers classes in the city as does UCR Extension and the
University of Redlands. There are five community colleges in the region including Mt. San Ja-
cinto Community College which also offers classes in the city.
Recreation & Tourism. Temecula has 23 parks and community facilities covering 231 acres
(Exhibit 97), an average of one acre for each 233 residents. The system is family oriented and
provides extensive access to soccer, baseball, tennis, in-line skating, swimming and basketball
facilities, many of them lighted. Nearly every park has children's play areas plus picnic and bar-
becue facilities. Areas and facilities have been set aside for serious joggers and cyclists. The
city's largest park covers 128 acres and offers nearly every conceivable form of sports and enter-
tainment possibilities, including many lighted courts and fields, and a large community meeting
facility.
Temecula's wine growing area is a unique Inland Empire asset. Its fifteen wineries grow a wide
range of varietal grapes, including such California favorites as Sauvignon Blanc, Chardonnay,
and Cabernet Sauvignon (Exhibit 98). The area serves as a hub for city tourism activity. The ex-
pansion of the Pechanga Entertainment Center, with the approval of the state's Indian gaming
measure, is adding to the lure of an area already known for annual events like the Temecula Val-
ley Balloon & Wine Festival, the Rod Run, Temecula Valley International Film Festival, and
more.
o
o
Public Safety. Temecula is the safest major city in the Inland Empire, one of the safest in Cali-
fornia, and its crime rate keeps falling. From 1991-1999, the city's crime rate per 1,000 residents
fell 50.5% according to the U.S. Department of Justice (Exhibit 99-102). In this period, the city
had 501 fewer crimes even though its population grew by 48.7%. As a result, the already low
violent crime rate dropped 44.3% in this period; the property crime rate fell another 51.3%.
Temecula's outstanding and improving public safety record is reflected in the fact that its 1999
crime rate of 27.2 incidents per 1,000 people was lower than either Corona (30.4) or Rancho
Cucamonga (31.2), the next safest major Inland Empire cities (Exhibits 103-104). Its property
crime rate of23.8 incidents per 1,000 residents was the lowest in this group, with Fontana (24.5)
the next safest. Its violent crime rate of 3.5 incidents per 1,000 people was just above Corona
(2.5) and Rancho Cucamonga (2.3) (Exhibits 105-106).
Temecula's public safety record is no accident. The City Council has adopted a standard of one
police officer per 1,000 residents and staffing has been increased as the city's population has
grown. Also, the city has established a paramedic response team to supplement its fire and ambu-
lance services. This team has served as a model to other cities in the region.
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 63
@(ill@O~ @q [b~ I
o
37.632 35 148 t
~, 32.348
22815 20216 19,048
17,449 17,295 16,811 16556
11 932 10,953
I II I
~~~Il:1D'O~~~
~~o'O~~
.ll' .l ,to ! ~ l "" ~ iJ' .. ",," I
~ j .9 # "
i ",-" ':i ,," .9 -Ii '" ii1 '"
.~ " r? l ., " ;$ ~
<i1 i f .<; .:!
f/ ~
c,c $ <:) .. 0'"
CJ
Source: CA Department of Education
o
School District Enrollment, 1999-2000 . . .
o In academic year 1999-2000, the Temecula Valley Unified School District had 17,449 students. Of these stu-
dents, 4,991 attended Temecula Valley and Chapparal high schools; 12,458 were enrolled in elementary and mid-
dle schools.
o The Temecula Valley Unified School District's 17,449 students gave it the 7'" highest enrollment in Riverside
County. The highest was the Riverside District (37,632). Nearby Murrieta had (10,953) (Exhibit 85).
School Enrollment Ethnicity, 1999-2000.. .
o School enrollment tells a great deal about the future diversity of the Inland Empire's communities.
o In academic year 1999-2000, 71.3% of Temecula students were White (Exhibit 86). This was in the 2'd largest
share among Riverside County large districts and much higher than the state average. The county average was
41.7%, the state's was 36.9%. The county's highest percentage was 72.7% in the Murrieta District.
o Hispanic students made up 17.2% of the enrollment in Temecula's schools, the second largest group. This the
lowest share for Riverside County's large districts. The county average was 45.0%. California's was 36.9%.
The highest percentage was 62.3% in the Desert Sands District (Palm Desert. India, La Quinta).
~@@.,~@}~Ii!J~~
~~o~~o'O~~
2.7%
71.3%
63.6%
. .
68.6%
46.0% 43 2
2.1% .
.3%
..%
. 7.6% 7.2%
f! I iJ' $ <? .ll' o' ".' ? l t; iJ ",,"
4"'# .9 .,!l & {J' CJ ~ ,,0 ,,$ ",-"
-if .ll'
.9 '" ii1 ". {J' (; ~ ., l ""
.<; .:! # <i? ;f r?
0 ". f/
& <i?
CJ <:) " $
I Source: CA Department of Education
Section 7 City of Temocula Page 66
o
o
o
@QD@O~ @(f ~~ I
~@llo~~~~
~~~~o'\J~~
23.6%
2.2%1.9%
I .:& <;' O' [;' feO '" l "" .; " I; I
() .? I ,f
if ~ :& .0 .;f ~ 'f!
'" ." ;;; ,,<>; " r-.e' '" '" "
(J I ,i ~ J'J::
r? ." ;f :f
{;' .. ,0 q"
.$ <i? (JO 0;
Source: CA Department of Education
School Enrollment Ethnicity (continued), 1998-1999 . . .
o In academic year 1999-2000, 4.3% of Temecula's students were Black Among major Riverside County dis-
tricts, this in the lowest group. The county average was 8.3%. The California average was 8.6%. The highest
share was in Moreno Valley (23.5%); the lowest was in Desert Sands (2.2%) (Exhibit 87).
o Asian students made up 5.7% of Temecula's students. This was in the middle range among Riverside County's
major districts. Moreno Valley had the highest percentage at 6.0%. The county average was 4.0%, the state av-
erage was I I.l %.
High School Completion Rate, 1998 . . .
o In 1998 (latest available data), the high school completion rate for Temecula's high schools was 95.5% (Exhibit
88). This figure ranked second among the II large districts in Riverside County.
o The Riverside County average for high school completion was 89.5%. The California average was 87.0%.
~~oGiJl'@lU~~~~
~~o~~o~@J'\J~
95.8% ~~ ~
~ 90.1% ~ ~~~~~
83.7%
.;J "" .; [;' r? 00 .",I!J i I :& €f <;' I
I &
/ ;# .0 {;' -i:' ".f (Jo I ,,$ (J~ ~
"! "" .$ l ..
r-."j ;; Ii' ;f .:& <i?
!? if
'-I (Jo 0; ." q
."
I Source: CA Department of Education I
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 56
o
o
@QD@Onaw @1 [b~ I
~~~~@l1D ~@M1~~
~~o~~o~@x(4J~
43.5%
37.3% 37.1% 36.0%
31.4% 290% 8 %
. 0 2.40 26.4% 26.1%
21.9% 20.9% 19.8%
4.6%
.~ # I '*. il "'.::. ;} ;J ff ~ {! 13 ?
of >$ " .~ Ii'
I! ~ v"" :.' I ..,# "" .0
"J 1:$ (} of '" ",0; ~
." ,si Ii
<? .~ ,? .<; -I -#
'" {j I! $ r
rS <) ." ~ " q;
<?
Source: CA Department ofEducatioo
University & State University Requirements Completed, Class of 1998 . . .
o For the Class of 1998, 21.9% of Temecula's high school seniors completed the courses required for entrance into
the University of California or the California State University system (Exhibit 89). This was the weakest of the
city's data.
o The Riverside County average was 29.0%, The California average was 36.0%.
SAT Scores, 1999. . .
o Among the 40.0% of Temecula's high school seniors who took the Scholastic Assessment Test in 1999, the aver-
age score was 1,021. Their performance ranked first among the major districts of Riverside County and ex-
ceeded the average for the State of California (Exhibit 90).
o The state average SAT score was 1,011. The Riverside County average was 949.
~[@,o@&'i]'~~
~~o~~o~@x(4J~
1021 1019 1,011 1,002 983 976 973 961
949 943 938 921
917
;J il !<.. " $ .~ ">5' ? f' ~ J' 13 ff
~fii ::r l' .!it I! ~ .0 & Ii' ..,#
"j v'" '" ." "J ~ U' "'if :.' ",0;
~ -I <? 4'''' .~ f! l -#
<)" i! '"
Vo .$ q;
..
0 ""
Source: CA Department of Education
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 67
o
o
o
@(![]@OtMw cOO [b~ I
~ID1Io~@Ir~~~@lli~
~ 0 o~~~'\lm
Sib Grade Readin. Math Lanpuape Snellinp
Alvord 644 636 635 629
Corona~Norco 649 644 643 636
Desert Sands 655 653 644 636
Hemet 650 647 637 637
JW1lpa 638 630 628 625
Lake Elsinore 652 647 636 636
Moreno Valley 639 635 630 626
Munieta 666 665 656 647
Palm Springs 646 646 635 629
Riverside 651 643 640 632
Temecula 659 658 651 649
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 647 642 637 632
CALIFORNIA 656 650 645 641
R.ank oflldi,idCt, 2 2 2 1
Points abovelbelow CALIF. 3 8 6 8
Points abovelbelow COUNTY 12 16 14 17
SoW"Ce: CA Department of Education
Testing Scores, 5th Graders, 1999 (not including limited English students) . . .
p Under Stanford 9 testing procedures, California students in grades 2-11 are tested in a variety of skills. The
"mean scaled scores" from these tests provide schools with "grade averages" for each skill, weighted (scaled) for
test question difficulty. To allow for easier comparison, the scores used here were for students that did not have
limited English ability.
p Using 5th graders as an example of elementary students, Temecula's students had mean scaled scores in the mid-
dle of Riverside County's 11 large districts. They ranked 1" in spelling and 2,d in reading, math and language to
the Murrieta District (Exhibit 98).
o Temecula's scores were above California averages on each test by 8 points in math and spelling, 6 points in lan-
guage and 3 points in reading (Exhibit 99). They exceeded the mean scaled score for Riverside County 5"' grad-
ers by over 10 points on all four tests.
&l:iliMl ~ @lj'@;jJ ~ 1iIDl@m!hl
~@jlj'~Illi:(l~~Wlilil
I 0 Tom"ul, I
o California
669 (2) 666 668(2) 660 661 (2) 646 649(1)
641
Reading
Math
Language
Spelling
Note: ()= rank of 11 districts
Source: CA Depat1rnenl of Education
Section 1
City of Te~ecula
Page 68
o
o
o
@(!j]@Onuw @\f [bW@ I
~ m~ @ 'jj'@&l1iYillm ~ llocP ~
~~o@j(WiiJ~l}{figitil~~~,ll~
10th Grade Readin~ Math Lanm'a~e Science Social Science
Alvord 684 683 661 673 649
Corona-Noreo 694 696 674 680 655
Desert Sands 692 697 670 679 653
Hemet 696 696 672 684 655
Jumpa 680 686 660 667 647
Lake Elsinore 695 698 669 684 654
Moreno Valley 688 692 666 674 649
Murrieta 682 678 655 673 648
Palm Springs 682 691 663 675 648
Riverside 698 696 674 680 656
Temecuhi 698 696 674 682 655
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 690 693 667 677 651
CALIFORNIA 697 701 677 682 657
R~nk ofll districts 1 tie 3tle 1tie 4 tie 2 tie
Points abovelbelow CALIF. 1 (5) (3) (0) (2)
Points abovelbelow COUNTY 8 3 7 3 5
Source: CA Department of Education
Testing Scores, 10th Graders, 1999 (not including limited English students). . .
o Using 10.h graders as an example of high school students, non-limited English students at Temecu\a's high
schools had mean scaled scores at or near the top of the II urban high school areas in Riverside County.
o Among the II districts to which they are being compared here, Temecula's lOth graders tied Riverside for I" in
reading, and that district plus Corona-Norco for I" in language. Students in the same three cities ranked 3" in
math. Temecula tied Hemet and Corona-Norco for 2" in social science. It ranked third in science, alone (Exhibit
93).
o Temecula's lOth graders scored above the Riverside County mean scaled scores on each of the five tests. They
exceed the California average in reading, were even in science, but were a little below the state average on the
other tests (Exhibit 94).
~IDa~@~~OOIll~
~@/'UljJjil!l!lrlF.\,Illiil(\)tri/ltilll~~
I 0 Tomoo.l. I
o California
698 11 tiel 697 696 13 tiel 701
67411 tiel 677 682131 682
655 12 tiel 657
Reading
Math
Language
Science
Social Science
Note: O=rankof 11 districb
Source: CA Department ofEducalion
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 59
@~OOCtw @{( [L~ I
~~~~~ll:fIlml:!)~,~
./ Carnnus Address Citv Year S.,..cialtv Highest Degrees Studeuts
California Bantist Colle>e 8432 Magnolia Riverside 1950 Liberal Arts Masters 2100
CA State Polvtechnic Uuiv. Pomona 3801 W. Temnle Pomona 1938 En.ineeIin. Masters 11,600
California State Univ. San Bemardino 5500 Uuiversitv Prkwv San Bdno 1960 Comnrehensive Masters 14300
California State Univ. San Marcos 333 S. Twin Oaks VlV San Marcos 1989 Comorehensive Masters 5,100
Chaffev Community College 5585 Haven Ave. R. Cucamonga 1883 Community Colle>e Associate 14,600
Claremont Graduate Universitv 170 E. Tenth Claremont 1925 Liberal Arts Ph.D. 2,400
Claremont McKenna Colle>e 500 E. Ninth St. Claremont 1946 Liberal Arts Bachelors 1,000
Crafton Hills Colle.e 11711 San Canvon Y ucaioa 1972 Communitv Colle.e A.A. 5,200
Havev Mudd College 301 E. 12th Street Claremont 1955 Science Bachelor 700
Keck Graduate Inst. ADolied Life Sci. 535 Watson Drive Claremont 2000 Life Science Ph.D. 35
La Sierra University 4700 Pierce Riverside 1922 Liberal Arts Ph.D. 1,300
Lorna Linda Universitv 11234 Anderson St. Lorna Linda 1905 Medical Dental Ph.D., M.D., DDS 3,600
Mt. San Jacinto Communitv College 1499 N. State. St. San J acintc 1965 Communitv Colle>e Associate 10,000
Pitzer Colle.e 1050 N. Mills Ave. Claremont 1963 Liberal Arts Bachelors 900
Pomona College 333 N. Colle.e Wav Claremont 1887 Liberal Arts Bachelors 1,500
Riverside Commun~ College 4800 Mal!llolia Riverside 1916 Community Colle"e Associate 25,000
San Bernardino V allev College 701 S. Mt. Vernon Av. San Bdno 1926 Community College Associate 13.000
Scriops College 1030 Columbia Ave. Claremont 1926 Liberal Arts Bachelors 800
Uuiversitv of Califurnia, Riverside 900 Uuiversitv Ave. Riverside 1954 Comnrehensive Ph.D. 12.300
University of La Verne 1950 Third St. La Verne 1891 Liberal Arts Ph.D. 2,600
Uuiversitv of Red1ands 1200 E. Colton Redlands 1907 Liberal Arts Ph.D. 3,700
Western Uuiversitv of Health Science 309 E. Second Street Pomona 1977 Medical D.O., M.S. 1,400
TotatEurolhnent 139,135
Source: Each Campus, The Business Press
o
College and University Enrollment. . .
o
Temecula is near 22 public & private colleges with a total of 139,135 students. There are 18,335 students
(13.7%) at three top schools of science and engineering: Cal Poly Pomona, plus Claremont's Harvey Mudd Col-
lege and Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences. Another 67,800 students (50.6%) go to five compre-
hensive community colleges with 7 campuses including Riverside Community College (Exhibit 95-96).
There are 12,300 (9.2%) undergraduates and graduate students at the University of California, Riverside, one of
the nation's premier biomedical, agricultural and environmental research institutions. 19,400 students (13.4%)
attend Cal State San Marcos in nearby San Diego County or Cal State San Bernardino.
16,300 students (12.2%) go to several prestigious private liberal arts colleges in or near Temecula including:
Claremont Colleges, University of Redlands, University of La Verne, La Sierra University and California Baptist
University. 5,000 medical and dental students (3.7%) attend Lorna Linda University Medical Center, one of the
nation's top medical and dental schools, or the Western University of Health Sciences in Pomona.
~~~&!J~I=r.,rnolll -
@iW@J~~o 4J~~
12,300 \
8.8% Medical & Dental
Liberal Arts Colleges r 5,000
16,300" 3.6%
"N fD'
Engineering & Science Colleges Community Colleges
18,335 67800
13.2'10 48.7%
CSU San Bernardino & San Marcos
19,400
13.9%
I Soorce'. The BWlinc!lS Presl &.Individual Campusc" I
o
o
o
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 60
~
c:::!l
~
~
i
(5J
i
il
I~
I
'0
=
c
'..
.
.
..
::
-<l
=
'.
:;
~
~
u
'a
u
0::
;>,
J;l
~ ~
~ ~
00 0
.Jl 0<:
" "
.\l .~
t':I ~ t':I tIS l;tI t':I ~ i:l
II.J 4) OU d.J II.J <U ~ ~ 'I)
..( ..( ..( ..( ..( ..( " ] f-<
'S 'S 'S 'S 's "8 < 0 ti'
I:) 0 I:) U 0 U U ~ 0
~ i:l:: i:i: i:i: i:i: 0: 'jj ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i:i: ~ ~
~~~~~~~~~"~
o1;'~~~~gP:;::r:&
ca is: p:; s:: p:; is: p:; ".c-'l"
=a <n rn .Vl <Il ell <n ~ 'a "0
~ l l ~ l ] l ~ ~ ~
~ ] ] ] ] ] ] ~ 0 ~
p=>uuuuuUP=>UP=>
...." &'i
8 '.0
g ~
'" ~
." ~
!(ll
;.:l <d
'i~
oS u
I\,) p:;
~ 4
P=> "il
'i<::
~ 8
" g
'S '"
> <d
~ ]
" "
f-< ~
~" ~
.c "
" ~
~ .~
P=> ....l
"'0 "0 "CI "'0 "0 "0 "'0 1-0
8 g g g g g g ~
~a~~]]]]]8
~~~i~:ai~ig~~~
~~~~~~~~]~~~
I: 0 ,
o
I:
I ~
IS> .
@ .
..
,I ~
.~
~ -g
~~~~.g
~l~~]
~ .~ ~ ~ ~ c;
~<<:ClUU;>
""lOo::t_\01r)
"C \0 If''I N If"l \0
~ If'"\ ~ ~ ~ :!;
:; M "<t' -.:t f"')
l.OOI.OOOOLOOLO
C\I0C'\lO:OO C\I ON
OMo.....mMOMO
000
000
ci ci ai
'" ~
~
~ ~ j
! ~ "0
:z ;> "il
,:,: t':I ~
:. :g ~
~ P=> P=>
-"
!a ~ .:;:; ~
";; e la e
o II.J ~ tl:I
g> ~ B "0
..( ~ :E j
iLl 13 _ t':I
~ 0 ,~ ~
u ...... ..... ~
~
~ ~ "0 ] ~
~ 0 ~ 0::: ~ tIS
.9 ~ ~ '0 S -3 Q
....l ~ .9 Jia u i
s "0 0 _~ 8 -;;
3~i~~~Cl
r-- N lti on 0\ 0 0"1
r- 0\ or. -.:t _ 0 0'1
00 V"l 0'1 00 _ 0\ 0
o 0 0\ _ 0'1 V N
M ('li ("f) V N "<t' ("t)
-;l
.~
o
5
:2
-"
-" e
~ -g
~ ~
~ ~
~o
~ .~
z z
.
~ ~
" 0..
U i':'-"
.~ 'g e
~ ~i
] ~ ~
~ ~ u
~ la ~
::'E :2 ;e
~~
~ 5
"U
~ ~.~
0.. 0. a
- '" a
o 'tol Q
'" "'"u
"il
CI U "
..-=
El -e ~
~ = a
;: ~ ~
~ ~ ~ <!J
~ ~ ~ ~
o 0 0 ~
'5 '5 '5 00
::! ~ .::! ..El
0.. 0.. 0.. '"
" " " II)
3 3 3 ~
..( ..(..( "00
~ ~ ~ ~ .~ "0
p:; is: s:: a U &
.rJ'l _r./J .rIl .~ .~ on
~ ~ ] 5 ~I
] ] ] ~ '" .
UUUU~'"
"
~
<<:
"
'a
"
it
.;;
a
..
..
~
on
.EJ
"
"
:2
e
;>,
"
.:
~
Il
'"
:a
0.
a
<<:
c;
..
0.
.;;
1:
=
..
U
~
00
."
"il
fi:
00
1:
..
0.
'"
~
;::l
~
~
::l
-;l
=
"
....
&!
"0 "'0 "0 _
o 0 0 0
~ ..8 ~ 11
- .0 -
o 0 U
.D ..c ..0 l-;
il,il,il,o
..... .- ..... ..g
~~~.s
o
o
00
N
~
i':' i':'
~ ~
u "
" "
0. '"
'" '"
OI.OLOOO
o C'\I (") C! 0
Lri 0 cv:i 'l"'" Lri
...
"
"
~
"
00
;;
..
'"
"
=
~
Otl
r-
oo
Q
'"
~ 8
= "'
.. '"
1:: _
u 0
~ .=
i:il If
0'"
"., -
'" 00
o 00
'" N
u
8~ -
"
"
o "'
= '"
l2 '0
o .=
:2 If
o '"
r- -
'" oo
_ 00
.,. N
~
-" E
J'! 8
Cl ~ "'0
" 'g =
"o~ 8 ~
a g
~-,,:28C1
0.. la J2 ~ ~
Cl Q.., {,,) "'a "3
~ ~::E ~ Co)
~~j~J
~
~
u
'"
o
>
~"
oS
"
-"
~
~ P=>
~ ~ c<:l "f
oo~ ~ ~ ~
~ u'a"E 'S
~ c::.~ u .~
_ == ~ c:: p...
8 .o;fj~ c<:l~ <<$" ~"
~ ]~~<
~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" " P=> 0:: 0:: 0::
.cO ~ ~" '" en (f.l
-fi ~ ] -5 -5 "5
~ .8 ~ -6 -6 -6
-~~]]]
..... '" P=> U U U
." ." ."
g g 0
~ ~ ~ ~
~]~~,~
~~JrZZz
LOOOO
C\I 0 C! 0
o ~ 'l"'" ~
o
LO~O~
M""": 1.0 T""
...... ot:i (")
N
~ ~
"'.~."~~~~-".,,
-;l3<f~~~e~
u~~)9~~ )9
o ~ ~ 'a ~ ~ ~ 'a
..d : "'0 01) d) 0 '0 01)
~~~~jj~~
~;:;~$t;;:2$~
~~~:q~~g::g::
N -.:t o:t" '<:t ("1'\ t'f') M M
"0
~
- "0
r.n 0 i
B'~ ~ p... ~
do-i ~ClS
a:g.Bp.. o~
~"'~OO~~OOtl
~ ,.2; c.f.l 13 p... p.. t N
ctI ctI c<:l::r: OJ) ts ~
]]].il~S.ll<
Q)ooo_~u~
5 5 5 5 >ll 0 .8 0
f-< f-< f-< f-< > ~ f-<
'"
OJ
.<::
C
'u
o
.<::
-
.;
-a
o
o
0.
-
'"
t--.
M
V)
oS
~
<Ii
..
..
OJ
=
....
'"
M
OJ)
"
.-
-
OJ
-
o
-
c
o
:;::l
III
e
u
Gl
a:::
06
.l2
...
III
Q.
=ta
.S
III
M
<Ii'
o
'.;::j
:.=
'u
<.lS
cc
'~nj
~ ~
o 0
<.) <.)
"'" :::
a 1:j
'" OJ
.,. ....
s,.s
0.0
"'" .-
01;;
0.....
0_
~ 5
;>-
0-
"'" 8
"-< >(
o 0
l:l a
,D .
@"'"
,,]
~~
'(j) 0..
""-<
o 0
~ ~
a g
....
~ 8-
.<:: 0
~~
" 0
u 0
o 0.
13M
OM
f-<C'l
~
..
..
..
"
Il.
"
:;
o
..
E
~
-
o
1:'
(j
o
....
c
o
1;
..
rJI
o
o
o
@(l[)@OOC\w @[J [b~ ,
Parks & Recreation (continued) . . .
o City parks are aimed at providing a wide variety of family activities. There is thus an exten-
sive network of soccer, baseball, tennis and basketball fields and courts, many lighted. Nearly
every park has picnic facilities. There are facilities for joggers, in-line skaters, cyclists, and
swimmers.
o The city also has a 128 acre major sports facility and community center offering nearly every
conceivable form of sports and entertainment possibility
i ~~~
I 'i]'~mm:ID
Winf'rv A rlllrpSlirl Attr9dinn.liil Phonp. NlImbpr
Baily Vineyard & Winery 33440 La Serena Tastine. Deli. Banauet (909) 676-9463
Callaway Vineyard & Winery 32720 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tasting, Picnic, Tour, Banquet, (800) 472-2377
Cilurzo Vineyard & Winery 41220 Calle Contento Tasting, Picnic, Tour, Banquet (909) 676-5250
Clos Du Muriel 33410 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tasting, Picnic, Tour (909) 676-5400
Falkner Winery 40620 Calle Contento Tasting. Picnic, Tour, Banquet (909) 676-8231
Filsinger Vineyard & Winery 39050 De Portola Road Tasting, Picnic, Tours, Banquet (909) 302-6363
Hart Winery 41300 Ayenida Biona Tasting, Picnic (909) 676-6300
Keyways Vineyard & Winery 37338 De Portola Road Tasting & Picnic (909) 302-7888
Maurice Carrie Winery 34225 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tasting, Picnic (909) 676-1711
Mount Palomar Winery 33820 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tasting, Banquet, Tour (909) 676-5047
Santa Margarita Winery 33490 Madera de Playa Tasting (909) 676-4431
Stuart Cellars 33515 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tasting, Picnic, Banquet (909) 676-6414
Thornton Winery 32575 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tasting, Tour, Banquet, Dining (909) 699-0099
Van Roekel Vineyard & Winery 34567 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tasting, Picnic (909) 699-6961
Wilson Creek Winery 35960 Rancho Calif. Rd. Tastine Picnic Bannuet Tour (909) 693-9463
Wineries & Ballooning. . .
o Temecula's wine growing area is a unique Inland Empire asset, made possible by a gap in the
mountains which allows an ocean sea breeze to reach the inland valley. The area boosts 15
wineries growing a wide range of varietal grapes, including such California favorites as Sau-
vignon Blanc, Chardonnay, and Cabernet Sauvignon.
o All of the wineries have tasting facilities. Most of the wineries have tours and picnic areas.
Some wineries have banquet facilities. There are streams, hill top vistas and wedding sites.
,',
I
.r-.
, I
I .
jI,:
; --,~? \(/
~tl" "V'.
(I .o~Clo
Q 1:000
o (J},Q \.P 0 c
,.
,
.>
/ I
,{ )'-;
-7
-"
,r.)
.. 0
c-
~
~~
"0
cr
o D 0"" ~oo
q ',' tl=~tb _ . 0 ~.:;.~
o '< J.;L.JV"L........J"
o ,o()
00>
o
o Q(l>
o Temecula is a mecca for balloonists. There are eight companies in the city offering rides to
adventuresome tourists. Each June, the annual Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival at-
tracts thousands to the city to view the spectacle.
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 62
o
o
o
@(![k';)orow @\] (b~ I
~~~~1JJOOX!l~
'jj'~1J~1J~
55.0 53.0 ..
From 1993-1999, Temecula's crime
rate per 1,000 people fell 50,5%.
42.8
36.8 35.2 34.4
27.2
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Uniform Crime Report
Crime Rate Cut In Half, 1993-1999 . . .
o Temecula's crime rate has fallen 50.5% between its peak in 1993 at 55.0 incidents per 1,000 people, and 1999
when it reached 27.2 crimes per 1,000 residents (Exhibits 99-100).
o
The rapid decline occurred because Temecula had 501 fewer crimes reported (-26.4%) between 1993 and 1999
even though its population increased by 16,811 people (48.7%).
For the year 1999, the drop in crimes per 1,000 people was 20.9%, coming after large decreases in each of the
prior 5 years. Clearly, Temecula is safe and becoming a lot safer.
o
I ~ 1J@XIDo~@Jfi:M:@ ~
'jj'~1J~1J~
Crime 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Murder 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
Forcible Rape 9 11 9 11 5 8 11
Robbery 53 34 39 43 42 27 22
Aggravaled Assaull 151 185 144 134 146 129 146
Burglary 406 502 361 384 328 370 389
Larceny Theft 950 1,017 978 846 901 954 710
Molar Vehicle Theft 320 231 198 151 166 149 116
Arson 7 8 9 7 3 4 4
Total Crimes 1,899 1,988 1,738 1,576 1,591 1,642 1,398
Population 34,499 37,528 40,567 42,805 45,162 47,696 51,310
Crimes Per 1,000 55.0 53.0 42.8 36.8 35.2 34.4 27.2
Change -3.8% -19.1% ;14.1% . -4.3% -2.3% -20.9"(.>
Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Uniform Crime Report, CA Department of Finance
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 63
o
o
o
@(![k';)orow @\] ~ I
~ 1J@'(jo~@ufiJml ~ 1JJOOX!l ~
'jj'~1J~1J~
6.3 6.1 4.7 4.4 4.3 3.5 3.5
I 1 I I I I I I I I
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
I Source: U.s. Depnrtmentof Justice, Uniform Crime Report I
Falling Violent 8, Property Crime Rates, 1993-1999. . .
o From 1993-1999, there was a 44.3% decline in Temecula's violent crime rate per 1,000 residents, from an al-
ready low level of 6.3 down to 3.5 (Exhibit 101). The number of actual homicides, rapes, robberies and felony
assaults dropped from 216 to 176, a fall of 37 (-17.1%). At the same time, the population increased by 16,811
people (48.7%) from an annual average of 34,499 to 51,310 (population is the average for January ]", before
and after the year).
o Temecula's property crime rate per 1,000 peaked at 48.8 in 1993 and fell to 23.8 in 1999, down 51.3% (Exhibit
102). There were 464 fewer burglaries. motor vehicle thefts, felony larcenies and arsons (-26.4%) from 1993-
1998, even though the city had added 16,811 people (48.7%).
~ ~@ufiJml~1JJOOX!l ~
'jj'(9iilil!llrlF.\,1J~1J~
48.8 46.8
38.1
32.4 31.0 31.0
23.8
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Unifonn Crime Report
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 64
@(![k';)orow @\] ~ ,
o
~1J~@ufiJml~1JJOOX!l ~
'jj'~/l!,~~~@VXW1J(OO)J!XOOl.1J~
64.6
53.2
46.5 45.3 1
36.7
31.5 31.2 30.4
27.2
~hW~.;
-~.
, , ..~
San Bdna
Ontario
Riverside
Pomona Moreno Valley Fontana R. Cucamonga Corona
Temecula
Source: U.S. Dcplll1n1ent of Justice, Uniform Crime Report
Crime Rates Compared,1999 . . .
o With 27.2 incidents per 1,000 people in 1999, Temecula had the lowest level of crime among the Inland Empire's
major cities (Exhibit 103). The closest were the cities of Corona (30.4) and Rancho Cucamonga (31.2).
o Exhibit 104 shows the breakdown of major crimes by category reported to the U.S. Justice Department each year.
The data is for 1999. It includes four categories of violent crime: homicide, forcible rape, robbery and felony as-
sault. It includes three categories of property crime: burglary, larceny theft and vehicle theft. To generate a
crime rate per 1,000 people, the average population for January 1, 1999 to 2000 from the CA Department ofFi-
nance was used.
o
, ~1J~~~1l~
~~~@,v,@r1J~
City Homicide Forcible Robbery Felony Burglary Larceny Vehicle Arson Total People Per
Raoe Assault Theft Theft 1,000
San Bernardino 23 81 709 1,207 2,570 5,524 1,795 115 12,024 185,669 64.8
Ontario 9 44 285 668 1,172 4,204 1,330 109 7,821 148,687 52.6
Riverside 30 77 628 1,329 2,250 5,733 1,618 246 11,911 257,000 46.3
Pomona 26 48 381 991 1,169 2,837 1,158 28 6,638 146,520 45.3
Moreno Valley 6 76 201 701 1,527 2,047 579 6 5,143 140,163 36.7
Fontana 8 61 216 517 845 1,134 779 29 3,589 114,591 31.3
R. Cucamonga 7 27 92 142 825 2,311 420 34 3,858 123,713 31.2
Corona 4 28 130 134 735 2,087 521 16 3,655 120,141 30.4
Temecula 0 11 22 146 389 710 116 4 1,398 51,3~C) 27.2
o
Source: U.S. Justice Department, Unifonn Crime Report
CA Department of Finance. Revised Population Estimales, 1999
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 65
o
o
o
@(!iJ@Orow @fJ (b~ ,
~lI~o~@utliml.,~lIM~
lf~ISIiiXlffix!)~~@Rmrll~lI~
10.8 9.9 1
3.5 2.5 2.2
San Bernardino Pomona
Riverside
Fontana Moreno Valley Ontario
Corona R. Cucamonga
Temecula
Source: U,S. Department of Justice, Unifonn Crime Report
Crime Rates Compared, 1999 . . .
o During 1999, Temecula's violent crime rate of 3.5 per 1,000 residents was just above that of Corona (2.5) and
Rancho Cucamonga (2.2) making it one of the Inland Empire's safest communities (Exhibit 105).
o Temecula's property crime rate of 23.8 per 1,000 residents was lower than any of the other major Inland Empire
cities. The next lowest was Fontana (24.5). The highest was San Bernardino (53.7) (Exhibit 106).
~ 1I@x;'~@ifiiml., ~lIJiX!1@~
~1S1lilIID:iiJ!J~~~1I~1I~
53.7
46.4 1
38.5
35.4
29.7 29.0 27.9
24.5 23.8
San Bdno
Riverside
Moreno Valley R. Cucnmongn
Corona
Temeculn
Fontana
Ontario
Pomona
Source: u.s. Department of Justice, Uniform Crime Report
Section 7
City of Temecula
Page 66
o
o
o
O[jiJ[ID[jiJ@] ~[?)5[{@ [i.Yili)ufucW I
CII1rY ((J)IF 1rIEMIEC1I.JILA
~IEC1rII((J)N ~
IINILANID IEMJPIIU MAIR?JKIE1r
Temecula has one of the most successful economies in the rapidly expanding Inland Empire (Riv-
erside-San Bernardino SMA, California). In the next decade, the CA Department of Finance
predicts that the inland region will be the fastest growing urban area of California in both abso-
lute and percentage terms. The two county region is expected to add 1.1 million more people by
2010, a 34.2% growth rate (Exhibits 107). That will represent an average gain of 110,121 per
year. As a result, the 20 I 0 population will reach 4,310,000 (Exhibit 108). Population growth
from 2000-2010 is expected to exceed the area's 1.0 million gain in the 1980s.
As a separate state, the Inland Empire's current population of 3.13 million people would rank 30th
behind Connecticut (3.27 million) and Oregon (3.28 million) (Exhibit 109). U.S. Commerce De-
partment data showed the Inland Empire with $60 billion in total personal income during 1997
(Exhibit 110). That exceeded 18 states, starting with Arkansas ($49 billion).
Why Are The Inland Empire's Numbers So Strong? Economists forecast the Inland Empire's
rapid expansion based upon their understanding of how Southern California's geography and
economic behavior interact. Since World War II, the Southland has grown outward from down-
town Los Angeles and San Diego. At various times, places like the San Fernando Valley and Or-
ange County in the west, and suburban San Diego County in the south have been centers of the
region's growth. Inevitably, once coastal county congestion caused land and space costs to rise,
development would be forced into the Inland Empire. This has now occurred. Growth is pushing
into Temecula, up the 1-15 from San Diego County. It is entering from the west as it moves along
the 1-10 and Route 60 from Los Angeles County and Route 91 from Orange County.
Southern California Job Creation Leader. This pattern underlies the Inland Empire's em-
ployment performance during the 1990s. In this period, Southern California suffered a severe
recession and decline in employment. However, there was no period in which Inland Empire em-
ployment stopped growing. As a result, from 1990-2000, the inland region added 261,000 jobs.
In this period, San Diego County added 211,000 jobs, Orange County added 200,000 and Los
Angeles County is still down over 100,000. In 1999, the inland region will add 50,000 jobs for
the second year in a row, an unprecedented occurrence (Exhibits 111-114).
Inexpensive Land. At its core, the development of1he Inland Empire is occurring because it is
the last region of the Southern California area to have large amounts of undeveloped land along
developed transportation corridors. This available "dirt" creates a location advantage for both
residential and industrial/commercial developers. Put simply, space is cheaper in the Inland Em-
pire, and the homes and buildings constructed on it sell or lease for substantially less than in
neighboring Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties.
Lower Residential Prices. In 1st Quarter 2000, the median Inland Empire home sold for
$140,000. This represented a price advantage ranging from $57,000 to $153,000 compared to
median priced homes in Southern California's coastal counties (Exhibit 115).
Section 8
City of Temecula
Page 66
O[jiJ[@[jiJ@] ~[P)~[f@ [iYili)~ I
Lower Cost Business SDace. The Inland Empire's industrial property, much of which is new,
enjoys a similar price advantage. The area's 1999 monthly asking lease price averages $0.33 a
square foot (Exhibit 116). Los Angeles County space averages $0.44, the Orange County average
is $0.52, and San Diego County's is $0.62. At an average lease rate of$1.47 per square foot per
month, the Inland Empire office market offers similar cost savings.
Labor Cost Savinl!:s. The Inland Empire's rapid population growth has created a second, less
obvious advantage for firms locating in cities like Temecula. People are willing to work for less
to avoid commuting to Southern California's coastal counties. A 1998 U.S. Bureau of Labor Sta-
tistics report shows that across the range of occupations, Inland Empire firms have an average
labor cost advantage of9.3% compared to those in Los Angeles County, 7.5% to Orange County
and 2.7% to San Diego County (Exhibits 117-118).
Logistics Advantages. Nearly all cargo flowing into and out of Southern California passes
through the Inland Empire. This is the case as the Cajon Pass on the 1-15 and the Banning Pass
on the 1-10 are the principal rail and trucking routes to the balance of the United States. Even
cargo leaving San Diego County must move up the 1-15. This location advantage, combined with
available inexpensive land, has made the region the logistics capital of the Southland. Firms save
time in getting their products to market by locating in the region.
Thus, BN-Santa Fe Railroad has just built a major intermodal railroad yard in San Bernardino
with the capacity of 400,000 container lifts per year. They did so as container lifts at the site have
grown at very high double digit rates since 1986 (Exhibit 119). Union Pacific Railroad has its
main switching yard in Colton and is picking a location for an intermodal facility. Meanwhile,
nearly every Southern California "Less Than Load" (LTL) trucking firm has its cargo sorting fa-
cility in the Inland Empire (Exhibit 120). And, UPS (Ontario International Airport) and Road-
way Package Delivery (Rialto) process all their Southern California cargo in the area. Finally,
Ontario International Airport is the second largest air cargo handling airport in the Southland
behind LAX. It is also the second busiest air passenger facility, handling over 6.7 million peo-
ple per year. Its new 24-gate terminal facility opened in September 1998 (Exhibits 121-122).
Prices. Companies locating in the Inland Empire have benefited from the benign price environ-
ment affecting Southern California. From 1993-1999, the area's Consumer Price Index increased
just above or below 2%. Only in 1998 did it begin to mirror the U.S. rate, which has also been
remarkably low (Exhibit 123).
ComDanies Flock To Region. As a consequence of these location advantages, firms have been
flocking to the Inland Empire. From 1994 to mid-2000, 717 firms either moved to the region
from Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties, put their new expansions in the area, or
moved locally to add space and employees. Of these firms, 30 located in Temecula. Inland Em-
pire permit valuation is soaring as new industrial facilities and homes are being built. It reached
$5.1 billion in 1999, up 22.2% from the prior year (Exhibit 124).
Summary. It is impossible to review the economic forces affecting the Inland Empire, and by
extension the City of Temecula, without being excited about its future. The region's geographic
location, competitive cost structure, and sophisticated logistics have put it in a position to have
the nation's fastest growing population, and Southern California's fastest growing economy.
Firms that need to be in the midst of California's booming economy, while avoiding its higher
costs of doing business are finding it to be an outstanding place to locate.
o
o
o
Section 6
City of Temecula
Page 67
o
o
o
O[li)~Oi)(gJ ~~O[f@ ~[jfu@Q I
~1J@7lo0'jj'@ji)W~~~~~~@
Rank Area 1999 2010 Change % Change A vg. Annual
Inland Empire 3,212.136 4,313,344 1,101.208 34.3% 110,121
1 Los Angeles Co. 9,884,255 10,604,452 720,197 7.3% 72,020
2 Riverside Co. 1,522,855 2,125,537 602,682 39.6% 60,268
3 San Diego Co. 2,911,468 3,441,436 529,968 18.2% 52,997
4 San Bernardino Co. 1,689,281 2,187,807 498,526 29.5% 49,853
5 Orange Co. 2,828,351 3,163,776 335,425 11.9% 33,543
6 Santa Clara Co. 1 ,736,722 2,021,417 284,695 16.4% 28,470
7 Sacramento Co. 1,209,472 1,436,286 226,814 18.8% 22,681
8 Alameda Co. 1,454,302 1,654,485 200,183 13.8% 20,018
9 Fresno Co. 805,005 953,457 148,452 18.4% 14,845
10 Contra Costa Co. 930,025 1,025,857 95,832 10.3% 9,583
Source: CA Department of Finance
Inland Empire Population Growth. . .
o Temecula is a major economic force within the Inland Empire. The area is expected to add the most people from
2000-20 I 0 than any other area of California.
o The CA Department of Finance forecasts that the Inland Empire will add I, I 0 I ,208 people in the next decade.
The next largest gain will be the 720,197 projected for Los Angeles County. Riverside County alone is expected
to add 602,682 (39.6%) and have the fastest growth rate and add the second largest number of people among the
state's counties (Exhibit 107).
o If the state's forecast comes true, the Inland Empire will add an average of 110,000 people per year from 2000-
2010. Total growth in the decade is forecasted to slightly exceed the 1,030,578 people that were added in the
1980s (Exhibit 108).
~'\@,~~llJ\ilillix9J 0
~~~~~
4.31
3.79
3.21
2.59
1990-2000
623;343 added
2000~~2010e
1,lOl,2~8 forecast
24~1% growth
2.2% annual rate
34.3% growth
3;0% annuil:lrate
66.1% growtb
5~2%aDnual rate
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
I Source: CA Department of Finance, 1998 I
Section 8
City of Temecula
Page 66
O(fi)~(fi)@] ~[?)~[(@ liYlliJufucW I
o
3.3 3.3
~1JIDo'jj'@iIjj)~~D
Il:ilkox!l ~ftis ~ 1J~
2.5
2.1
1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7
1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
1.0 09
. 0.7
" , . ] :~ ~ ~ ] . i 0 . . 0 '~ ~ '" . ~ . . .l! g on
~ ." 'S " ~ " -;; ~ ~ ~ " "
.g ~ . .~ '>< ';; ~ ~ ~ E
~ ~ ::> ~ :;; :!i :"i " ~ -li E
" . . "- ;;:
0 ~ '" .~ ". ~ ;; Z :;; "' ;I: ij 0 " c::l . 0
. . :;; > ~
~ :E t< ~ Z '" c::l -g -"
0 ;I: 0 t:
U . . i2 0
:s "' z ~ 0
on Z
Note: Oregon Ranked 281h
Source: U,S. Deparlment of Commerce
o
Inland Empire As A State. . .
o In 1998, the Inland Empire's population of3.13 million would rank 30th as a state just behind Oregon (3.28 mil-
lion) and Connecticut (3.27 million). The 3.79 million forecasted for 2005 would rank 27"' if that population ex-
isted today (Exhibit 109).
o In 1997, the Inland Empire's total personal income of $60 billion ranked 32'" as a state just behind Kansas ($62
billion) and $11 billion above Arkansas ($49 billion) (Exhibit 110). The $82 billion in personal income fore-
casted for 2005 by the U.S. Commerce Departmen~ if it had existed in 1997, would have ranked 26'h
~1J1J@.,o'jj'@iIjj) ~ ilDm:w@~D
~~ftis/}!'~WlWe,~
':t'~
$67
$66
j
$69
$89
$82
$80
$78
$76
e'~'~ .~:..
$62
$60
,P1t
"",{
'., ~''1
$49
$49
$45
$42
. . ~ 2 . " . . ~ " & 'a . ]
ij .~ 0 .S 0 S ~ '" "- ~
0 J ] if 0 " ~ ~ ~ .. ::>
-;; N -;;
'3 is ". . .
;;: el el .. z
0 u :>2 <: .
--' oj 0 :E
0 Note: AIllbmnaranked 24th in 1997, Kansas wlls31st
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce
Section 6 City of Temecula Page 69
o
o
o
DOi)O@Oi)@] ~[?)5[{@ ~~ I
Mffim'j)'j)41o~~ 0 0
~ ~ ~~1Jtr@lJlX9)o 'j)~~
1,100.000
1,000,000
-0- 12.Monlh Moving AvCJUgll
- 0 Monthly Employment
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500.000
400,000
~_~~_~~~~_~_B_~~~=
Each Point: Average of 6-months before and after
Source: CA Employment Development Deparlment
Inland Empire 8, Southern California Job Growth. . .
o Temecula's prosperity is in part conditioned by the Inland Empire's very strong economic environment.
o From 1990-1994, the Inland Empire economy added jobs slowly, at a time when Southern. California as a whole
was suffering a severe recession and steep decline in employment (Exhibits 111-112).
o From 1994-2000, the Inland Empire economy has added jobs at a rapid rate, as Southern California moved from a
period of contraction into one of economic recovery and rapid expansion.
o By 1999, Inland Empire employment is far above its 1990 level. For Southern California as a whole, employ-
ment is also in positive territory, though it only reached that state in 1997.
Mmm'j)'j)~c@@., ~ ~~~1Jtr@lJlX9)
~~o~oD~o~ollJi1ID:ii:l:9]~o'j)~~
8,200.000
7,800,000
-0- 12-MOIIth Moving Averogo
-0 MonthlyEmploymenl
7,400,
7,000,
6,600,000
5,400,00
6,200,000
5,l1OO,000
~_~~_~~~~_~_B_~~~=
Each Point: Average of6-monlhs beFore and after
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 8
City of Temecula
Page 70
o
o
o
Duu[l@uuc9J @;UU~O[i@ ~~ I
~1J1J1Jo~~~~~
~~(@1J_ \100J(@~[l3@i]~
602.475
260 725
210 600 199.650 ..
43.625 .
I I
(112,125)
Los Angeles Co.
Ventura Co.
San Diego Co.
Orange Co.
Inland Empire
So. California
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Inland Empire 8, Southern California Employment, 2000 vs. 1990 . . .
o Temecula's economy has blossomed in part because the Inland Empire has outperformed every other sub-market
of the Southern California economy (Exhibit 113).
o Comparing average employment for the first four months of 2000 to that of 1990, the Inland Empire is up
260,725 jobs. Second place San Diego County has gained 210,600. Orange County is up 199,650 jobs. Ventura
has added 43,625. In sharp contrast, Los Angeles County is still 112,125 jobs below its 1990 level.
o Despite having the smallest economy, the Inland Empire has thus been Southern California's absolute leader in
job creation during the 1990s.
o In the late 1980s, the Inland Empire produced jobs in the 36,000 to 40,000 range, with a jump to 53,325 in the
first four months of 1990. In 1999 and 2000, the Inland Empire is back to adding jobs at a rate of over 50,000
per year (Exhibit 114).
~1J'OO..~~~ItJ.j}fmil~
~~~@'IIIbJ.1J~
53,325
53,200 51,400
40,750
37,750 36300 36850
. . 34,475
32,725
33.725
29,750
28.025
24,950
15,675
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Section 8
City of Temecula
Page 71
o
o
o
O[jj)[k<;)[jj)@] ~~~(j@ [iYiliJufucW I
~1J1J(ij.,~~~II:Alli:l:ffi]~&;,~~~
~~~&;'~[){@J:mJ, 1J@(l~~
o Median All Home Price
o Inland Empire Advantage
$289,000
$293,000
$253,000
$197,000
$140,000
149,000
153,000
113,000
$57,000
Inland Empire
Los Angeles
San Diego
Source: Datnquick
Orange
Ventura
Inland Empire Space Cost Advantage. . .
o Inland Empire job creation has exceeded Southern California averages because people and firms have moved to
the area in response to its cost advantages. These start with space costs. The heavy urbanization of Los Angeles,
Orange and San Diego counties has left them with liltle undeveloped land. As a result, space in Temecula and
the Inland Empire is significantly less expensive. The median priced home in the Inland Empire ($/40,000) is
thus selling for $57,000 to $153,000 less than homes in coastal counties (Exhibit 115).
o Manufacturing and distribution firms find that the Inland Empire is the only place where large new facilities can
be constructed. At $0.33 per square foot/month, these facilities are leasing for substantially less cost per square
foot than space in older coastal county sub-markets ($0.40-$0.60). The Inland Empire offers similar office space
cost savings, except compared to the North San Diego County area (Exhibit 116).
~1J1J@" 0 . 0 - . o. - ~ &'@, @;j)I/oolJ~
Industrial Space Per Square FootlMonth Commercial Office Space Sq. Per FootlMonth
Market Lease Rate Market Lease Rate
Orange-South $0.60 Orange-Airport $2.57
Orange-Airport $0.57 Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena $2.22
San Diego-North $0.57 CentralL.A. $2.08
San Fernando $0.54 San Diego Downtown $1.95
Orange-West $0.52 Orange-North $1.89
San Gabriel $0.51 San Gabriel Valley $1.74
Orange-Central $0.48 Ontario & R. Cucamonga $1.65
Orange-North $0.44 Riverside $1.60
Mid Cities $0.42 Temecula $1.50
LA-Central $0.41 San Bernardino $1.40
South Bay $0.40 Vi~tor Valley $1.35
'In1llIld E;mpire $0.33 Vista-San Marcos $1.33
Source: Grubb & Ellis
Section 8
City of Temecula
Page 72
o
o
o
OOD[l@OD@] ~~O[j@ ~[jfu@Q I
@:illIMJ1J1J71o~~~~ ~
~~4JWl~~
I $33,301 I I $32,743 I I $31,270 I I $30,466 I
-2.7%
~7.5%
-9.3%
Los Angeles
Orange COlll1ty
San Diego
Inland Empire
Source: CA Employment Development Department
Inland Empire Labor Cost Advantage. . .
o People living in the Inland Empire prefer to work in the Inland Empire. They dislike the long commutes to Or-
ange. Los Angeles or San Diego counties. They do not like the long hours away from their families. Economi-
cally, they realize that their average work week is much more than 40 hours if their driving time is included.
o For this reason, Inland Empire workers are willing to work for a little less to avoid long drives. Employers locat-
ing in Inland Empire cities like Temecula thus find that their labor costs are from 7.5% to 9.3% lower than in Or-
ange and Los Angeles counties, and 2.7% below San Diego County (Exhibit 117).
o The latest data available on Inland Empire's weekly wages & salaries (1998) is from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Data on 478 occupations was the basis for comparisons to other Southland areas (Exhibit 118).
~1J1J@"~~~~~~
~lO o. 0 Wll@ffi) ~~ ~ 0 .0' 1]\003
Occupation Weekly Occupation Weekly Occupation Weekly
Manager, Industrial Production $28.02 Computer Programming Aides $15.91 Electrical Assembler $10.68
Engineering, Electrical 27.86 Drafters 15.62 Eleclrical Assembler 10.68
Manager, Financial 27.33 Truck Drivers: Heavy 15.36 Truck Drivers: lighl 10.52
Computer Systems Analyst III 24.56 Maintenance: Machinery 14.68 Manufacturing Bakers 9.76
Computer Programmers III 24.35 Automotive Mechanics 14.66 Machine Operator 9.69
Manager, PW"chasing 21.77 Computer Operators 13.03 Handlers, Laborers, Movers 9.56
Engineers, Mechanical 21.75 Operator, Numerical Control Tool 13.18 Telemarketers 9.46
Technicians & Technologists 19.13 Secretalies, except legal, medical 12.26 Janitors 8.89
Supervisor, front line: logistics 19.49 Clerks, Payroll & Accounting 12.09 Receptionist 8.86
Supervisor, front line: production 17.99 Chemical Equipment Operators 11.71 Extruding Machine Operator 8.53
Machinery Maintenance Mechanic 16.67 Clerks. Shipping & Receiving 1l.50 Packers & Packagers 7.23
Pattern & Mold Maker 16.56 Sheet Metal Workers 11.38 Clerks, General Office 6.69
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics, 1998
Section 8
City of Temecula
Page 73
o
o
o
OOil[l:;)Oil@] ~~~(j@ li.YiliJ~ I
@:iiillill1l~~~[?@~ ~'Wli'llI
~~~
32616
300 719
237,931
178,270
159,701
132,945
7,755
90,279
55 233 70,090
35 314 41 403 '
23 387' '
10859 '
1999
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Source: Burlington Northern Santo Fe Railroad
Inland Empire's Sophisticated Logistics Infrastructure. . .
o Firms locating in Temecu!a have uncongested access to the Inland Empire's sophisticated and expanding logis-
tics infrastructure. This is crucial to goods producers and distributors in the era of Just-In-Time inventory control.
o Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad opened its 400,000 container capacity intermodal rail facility in San Ber-
nardino in 1996. It has allowed the railroad's container handling to soar to 326,166 lifts in 1999 (Exhibit 119).
Inland Empire firms can use this facility and avoid the congested intermodal rail yards in Los Angeles County's
harbor area.
o Southern California's trucking firms are increasingly locating their major cargo handling facilities in the Inland
Empire. Most of Southern California's large "Less Than Load" firms bring their Southern California shipments
to cross-docks in the area for processing. The regional facilities for UPS (Ontario 1nternational Airport) and
Roadway Package (Rialto) are also located here.(Exhibit 120).
o Firms locating in Temecula and the Inland Empire generally save time, as their cargo does not have to move
across the congested Los Angeles basin before being processed and shipped across the country.
~1J?'@o~'jf~~~
~~~
Firm I Location
Trocldna: Full Load
JB Hunt Transport, Inc. I San BemardinolFonlana
Trucldna: L TL Southern California Centers
Cnnsolidaled Freight Mira Lorna
Roadway Express Adelanto, Bloomington (new)
Yellow Freighl Systems Barslow, San Bernardino (new)
ABF Freight Syslems Adelanlo
Watkins Freight Lines Mira Lorna
GI Trucking Co. Fontana
Packaae Deliverv: Southern California Centers
UPS Ontario International Airport
Roadway Package Delivery Riallo
Federal Express Temecula, Ontario Int. Airport
Section 8
City of Temocula
Page 74
O[Ji)[k;)[Ji)c9] ~~5[f@ [i!'iliJ~ I
o
~~~.di.'iU~V~
@llj;]jIj;)~~~~
691,906121.1%)
9(1: 461,74716.6%)464,2381.19%) 488.774(7.6%)
437,13913.0%) .
H; 379,911(7.6%)388,96311.9%)
363,302 16.1%}
813 308,117318.6%)
272,838 282,6683.8%1
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1991
1998
1999
20DOc
Note: 1998d~clillcfromAsiIll1FinmllcB1Crilis
Source: OntariohttemBtiOlUllAirport
Ontario International Airport. . .
o
o Firms locating in the Inland Empire have uncongested freeway access to Ontario International Airport. This
facility's new 24-gate passenger terminal opened in September 1998. The airport is in the process of expanding
its cargo handling capability.
o From 1990-2000, Ontario International Airport has seen its air cargo tonnage expand from 272,638 tons to an
estimated 591,905 tons, up 117.1% (Exhibit 121). As Inland Empire shippers expand their demand for air cargo
service at the facility, the number of flights to accommodate them is increasing.
o From 1990-2000, air passenger volume at Ontario International Airport rose from 5,420,335 to an estimated
6,702,987, up 23.7% (Exhibit 122). Traffic volume is beginning to expand again now that the new 24-gate ter-
minal and associated parking complexes have opened and more flights are being added.
~'DZ!&o{}jjJ~~
~~~'DD' 000
8578005 6,702,987
6,386,000 6 405 097 6 62 6.434,858 I .
6,121.623 6,192,035 "6,252,838 ,300,8
5,791.818
5.420.335
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000.
Note: 1998 decline from Asian Finnnical Crisis
0 Source: Ontario International Airport
Section 8 City of Temecula Page 75
o
o
o
O[ji)~[ji)cQ] ~~~[(@ ~r:rfucW I
I ~4J~~~~@l@W@li)1
~&!JMo@.,@&uD~
7.0%
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
1989
-{}- U.S. - G . So. Calif.
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
! Source: U,S. Bmeau of Labor Statistics
Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Consumer Prices. . .
o From 1993-2000, firms located in Temecula and the Inland Empire have been in a benign inflation environment.
In this period, the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Consumer Price Index has risen 2% a year or less. Only in
1998-2000 have the area's prices begun to mirror U.S. price increases (Exhibit 123).
Inland Empire Building Permit Valuation. . .
o Total permit valuation in the Inland Empire reflecls both the area's competitive advantages and the return of
prosperity to the Southern California economy. Thus, in 1999, permit valuation reached $5.1 billion, the highest
in the decade (Exhibit 124).
~1J:oo.,o'jj'<MIJ~~\Yl~
Ili'/l;mil~, 1J~1J~
$5.1
$4.5
$4.2
$3.3
$2.9
$2.5 $2.3 $2.3 $2.5
$2.2
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1996
1999
I Construction Industry Research Board I
Section 8
City of Temecula
Page 76
~lEM 1
~lEM ;2
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED WORKSHOP MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 27, 2000
The City Council convened in an adjourned workshop meeting at 6:05 P.M., on Tuesday,
April 27, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Present:
Council members:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, and Stone.
Absent:
Councilmember:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
There were no Council reports.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1 Second Workshop for the Riverside Countv Inteqrated Plan (RCIP)
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and file.
City Manager Nelson provided an overview of the staff report (of record), noting that a third
Workshop has been tentatively scheduled for July, and introduced Mr. Richard Lashbrook,
Agency Director.
Mr. Lashbrook, in turn, expressed appreciation to the City Council members and staff for their
involvement associated with this process, noting that the City's proactive efforts have
encouraged similar participation by other cities in this process. Proceeding with a more detailed
overview of the continual progress, Mr. Lashbrook introduced Mr. Jim Henderson, Planning
Manager, and Mr. Steve Smith, consultant.
By way of a Power Point presentation, Mr. Henderson provided a progress report since the City
Council's Workshop in February, noting and referencing the following:
o Anticipated growth; 18 to 20 million additional people in the State of California by
2020; one-third of that anticipated growth will be in Southern California with
approximately 11/2 million of the one-third being in Riverside County;
o Challenges - mobility requirements, housing requirements, preservation of open
space, and the balancing of other infrastructure needs of the population (roads as
well as utility infrastructure);
o Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) is comprised of a three-part process
(General Plan Transportation, CETAP issues, and habitat conservation);
RIMinulesl042700
o RCIP development process has been underway for approximately one year, noting
that last year of the process will primarily consist of the approval process;
o RCIP is a stakeholder-driven process; the County continues to grow as the Plan
develops; the Plan must reflect flexibility in order to meet the changing issues and
state of development;
General Plan
o Framework for land development;
o Identifies conservation and open space issues;
o Depicts Transportation ElemenVCirculation ElemenVHousing Element
o General Plan and the Housing Element of the General Plan must be approved at
State level.
Southwest Area Plan (SWAP)
o Plan most significant to the City because it surrounds the City;
o Largest Plan of the Western County Plans.
By way of Power Point, Mr. Henderson reviewed and, in detail, elaborated on three alternatives:
o Trend Alternative - continuation of existing land use policies
o Sphere of Influence - cities have planned for development outside the border within
the sphere of influence
o Vision Alternative (preferred alternative) - derived from the communities;
densification in a specified area.
Councilman Roberts relayed his concern with the County recently approving requested
upzonings from industrial to residential and approving such requests prior to the implementation
of the RCIP.
Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero commented on the General Plan Advisory Committee's
recommendation and the Board's approval of an interim period in terms of approvals and the
desire to achieve an agreement on the Area Plan and its compatibility with the evolving Plan.
Echoing Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero's comment, Mayor Stone reiterated the City's continual
concern of approved upzonings within the City's sphere and as a result, placing the City in a
position to mitigate associated impacts which should be responsibility of the County and,
therefore, requested that such upzoning be reduced until the completion of the RCIP.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill provided clarification as to upzonings, noting the following:
o Local legislative body and the County have the power to determine appropriate
land use; property upzonings are not the right of a private property owner;
R:\Minutesl042700
2
o City has not upzoned any property in the City but that such upzonings occur
within the County.
Councilman Naggar relayed his desire to request that the County stop the consideration of
upzoning.
In order to receive the City Council's input as to the Vision Alternative, Mr. Lashbrook noted that
the City Council would be provided maps of a current draft and requested that input be provided
to the County.
In response to Councilman Pratt's support of mass transit, Mr. Henderson, by way of slides,
commented on transit, noting that mass transit, to be effective, must be convenient, and as well
commented on the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, noting that the Plan will protect
approximately 164 species, will address open space, local control, design process, and
development policy issues to accomplish conservation.
At 7:04 P.M., Mayor Stone called a short recess and reconvened the meeting at 7:11 P.M.
Mr. Steve Smith, consultant, reviewed efforts relative to the transportation program, referencing
the following:
o Circulation Element of the General Plan - County-wide element
o Corridor evaluation to address major improvements, major transportation facilities,
multi-module facilities in the Western County, commenting on the Banning/Beaumont
to Temecula Corridor and associated efforts in reducing traffic and associated
financing necessary
o CETAP process, encouraging City participation at the May 2,2000, meeting
Transportation strateav
o Promote job growth
o Expanding freeway and arterial system
o Transit - important to arrange land use to ensure serviceability
Transit Svstem components or options
o Commuter rail
o Express bus
o Light rail
Speaking in support of freeway management, Councilman Pratt commented on mass transit
and the need to address transportation in conjunction with the development of projects.
R:\Minutes\042700
3
In closing, Mayor Stone thanked Mr. Lashbrook, Mr. Henderson, and County representatives for
the status report and relayed his support of the third RCIP Workshop scheduled for July.
Mr. Bob Wheeler, 29090 Camino Alba, Murrieta, relayed his support of the RCIP process as
well as the Southwest Area Plan.
In response to Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Lashbrook advised that County staff would be more than willing
to provide all approved Specific Plans, advising that County staff is currently in the process of
completing an accurate account of all approved lots.
City Manager Nelson suggested that the County provide, at the July Workshop, updated
information with regard to existing entitlements, specifically those developments which could
impact the City, and how such developments relate to the preferred alternative.
2 Rancho California Water Issues
RECOMMENDA lION:
2.1 Consider the information presented by Mr. John Henniger, General
Manager of Rancho California Water District (RCWD) relating to current
and future availability of water in this area.
In response to the City Council's request at the March 21, 2000, City Council meeting to receive
information with regard to water availability, Assistant City Manager O'Grady introduced Mr. Jim
Henniger, General Manager of RCWD, who, in turn, provided an overview on water availability
in this area and the District's efforts to accommodate the water needs for the projected growth in
this area, commenting on the following:
o District structure and overview, referencing the Master Plan and land use elements
for the design and development of District facilities and noting the District's Master
Plan will accommodate a population of 100,000
o Major water resources - Northern California and Colorado River
o Existing storage facilities
o Conservation efforts
o Purchase of raw untreated water to supplement local supplies
o Reclaimed water
Mr. Andy Webster, RCWD representative, further commented on facility planning and
distribution efforts, referencing the new aqua duct and noting that once the completion of it, the
District will have secured all water sources necessary to meet the City's future needs up to the
buildout.
In response to Councilman Naggar, discussion ensued with regard to the use of reclaimed
water for City parks and it was noted that the District would not envision being involved in the
gray water business. Mr. Naggar suggested that the use of gray water be further explored.
R:\Minulesl042700
4
In closing, City Manager Nelson thanked the County representatives and the Water District
representatives for their participation in providing information to the City Council and the public.
As another means of public awareness with regard to the RCIP as well as other informative
issues, Mr. Nelson encouraged the use of the City's Website.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:30 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 9, 2000, at 7:00
P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutesl042700
5
~rEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $3,631,309.50
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 11th day of July, 2000.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 2000-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 2000- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Temecula on the 11th day of July, 2000 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos 2000-
2
CITY OF TEIVlECULA
0 LIST OF DEMANDS
06/22/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 215,838.03
06/29100 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 259,877.62
07/11/00 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 2,913,299.11
06/22/00 TOTAL PAYROll RUN: 189,875.58
06/29100 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 52,419.16
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 07111100 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 3,631,309.50
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL FUND $ 1,093,203.25
165 RDA DEV-LOWIMOD SET ASIDE 9,537.40
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 127,880.57
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 4,197.89
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 0.00
193 Tese SERVICE LEVEL C 39,099.91
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 0 1,158,652.43
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND 763,015.61
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 119,988.53
300 INSURANCE FUND 2,572.54
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 33,644.34
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 24,381.61
340 FACILITIES 10,603.79
0 $ 3,389,014.76
100 GENERAL FUND $ 172,382.37
165 RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 4,358.77
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 47,253.73
193 lese SERVICE LEVEL C 2,409.89
194 TCSD SERVICE lEVEL D 406.46
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 2,021.39
300 INSURANCE FUND 1,012.43
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5,510.65
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 1,170.18
340 FACILITIES 5,768.87 242,294.74
TOTAL BY FUND: $ 3,631,309.50
OUNTlNG ASSISTANT
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOllOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOllOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
o
VOUCHRE2
06/22/00 13:51
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 0
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - C!P
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 12
AMOUNT
97,593.68
8,224.66
41,949.25
1,689.55
8,567.01
261. 72
10,832.74
882.18
2,422.51
22,430.65
14,093.46
6,890.62
215,838.03
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUM8ER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 20,681.66
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAl< (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 247.96
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 4,885.51
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAl< (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 274.45
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 91.86
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 86.10
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 53.42
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 799.24
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 174.70
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 496.79
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 5,076.08
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 91.95
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAl< (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 1,436.31
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAl< (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 70.59
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAl< (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 15.89
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAl< (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 43.23
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 24.08
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 156.32
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 41.36
181744 06/22/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 146.85 34,894.35
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 001-2070 89.40
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAl< (EDD) 000444 SOl 165-2070 3.30
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 190-2070 129.12
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAl< (EDD) 000444 SOl 193-2070 2.18
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 280-2070 .61
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 320-2070 4.01
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 330-2070 3.19
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 340-2070 4.20
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 5,572.98
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAl< (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 83.43
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAl< (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 965.51
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 53.21
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAl< (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 25.97
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 33.36
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 8.92
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 188.50
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 38.27
181780 06/22/00 000444 I NSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 99.62 7,305.78
62977 06/22/00 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIA MISC SUPPLIES-TINYTOTS/DAYCAMP 190-183-999-5340 148.71 148_71
62978 06/22/00 002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES HIGH HOPES EXCURSION BUS TRANS 190-183-999-5350 562.80 562_80
62979 06/22/00 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 837.00
62979 06/22/00 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 27.00
62979 06/22/00 003688 ALTIMA SOLUTIONS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 64.87 928.87
62980 06/22/00 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE OLD TOWN FLAGS 001-164-603-5212 510.00
62980 06/22/00 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE FREIGHT 001-164-603-5212 3.71
62980 06/22/00 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE SALES TAX 001-164-603-5212 39.53 553.24
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
62981 06/22/00 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP: D. ROCKHOLT 001-161-999-5226 230.00 230.00
62982 06/22/00 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS STAFF TRAINING PROCESSING FEE 190-180-999-5261 10.00
62982 06/22/00 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS STAFF TRAINING PROCESSING FEE 190-180-999-5261 35.00 45.DD
62983 06/22/00 004169 ANAHEIM ORANGE COUNTY V ANNUAL CITY MEM8ERSHIP 001-111-999-5226 515.00
62983 06/22/00 004169 ANAHEIM ORANGE COUNTY V ANNUAL CITY MEMBERSHIP 001-111-999-5270 20.00 535.00
62984 06/22/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/3 REID 001-110-999-5118 503.10
62984 06/22/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/3 BRUNER 001-163-999-5118 192.00
62984 06/22/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/3 BRUNER 001-165-999-5118 192.00
62984 06/22/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/3 WEST HAVER 001-162-999-5118 468.00 1,355.10
62985 06/22/00 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER ELECTRICAL SVCS-TCSD 190-180-999-5212 230.50 230.50
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 001-2370 2,665.98
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 165-2370 71.52
62986 06/22/00 004037 8ARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' CaMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 190-2370 1,003.40
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' CaMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 193-2370 40.21
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' CaMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 194-2370 8.82
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 280-2370 25.62
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 300-2370 2.80
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 320-2370 41.99
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 330-2370 8.50
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 340-2370 186.41
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 001-1182 10.42
62986 06/22/00 004037 BARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 190-183-999-5112 4.10
62986 06/22/00 004037 8ARNEY & BARNEY WORKERS' COMP PREMIUM FOR MAY 190-1990 1.07 4,070.84
62987 06/22/00 0023n BEST BUY COMPANY INC CASIO DIGITAL CAMERA QV3000EX 001-161-999-5242 999.99
62987 06/22/00 0023n BEST BUY COMPANY INC CORPORATE SERVICE PLAN 001-161-999-5242 59.99
62987 06/22/00 0023n BEST BUY COMPANY INC SALES TAX 001-161-999-5242 n.50 1,137.48
62988 06/22/00 003138 CAL MAT MAY A.C REPAIR - PW 001-164-601-5218 404.64
62988 06/22/00 003138 CAL MAT A.C. FOR PUBLIC WORKS 001-1990 1,607.59 2,012.23
62989 06/22/00 CALF PEACE OFFICERS' AS '00 LEGISLATE UPDT-TRNG212359 001-170-999-5261 51.00 51.00
62990 06/22/00 003549 CALIF ASSN OF MUSEUMS MEMBERSHIP DUES:H.PARKER 190.180-999-5226 100.00 100.00
62991 06/22/00 001062 CALIF STATE OF CONTROLLER'S CONFIRMATION FEE 001-140-999-5220 100.00 100.00
62992 06/22/00 003629 CALTROP ENGINEERING COR FEB SVCS:PALA BRIDGE INSPECTIO 210-165-631-5801 3,268.00 3,268.00
62993 06/22/00 CANYON-CAHAN TEMECULA L REFUND:ENG DEP LD99-208GR 001-2670 995.00 995.00
62994 06/22/00 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES 300-199-999-5205 150.91 150.91
62995 06/22/00 CARTER, ROBERT ALLEN REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-183-4990 100.00 100.00
62996 06/22/00 002534 CATERERS CAFE REFRSHMNTS:MGMT ANALYST PANEL 001-150-999-5260 12.62 12.62
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCR I PTI ON NUMBER AMOUNT AMClJNT
62997 06/22/00 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ALARM MONITORING SVCS-SNR CTR 190-181-999-5250 45.00 45.00
62998 06/22/00 002358 CERTIFIED FOLDER OISPLA RACK BROCHURES OISTRIB SVCS 001-111-999-5270 34.02 34.02
62999 06/22/00 003775 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL TEM AFGAHNS FOR CITY PROMOTION 001-111-999-5270 550.00 550.00
63000 06/22/00 001193 COMP USA INC HP NOTEBOOK COMPUTER FOR EOC 001-161-610-5604 4,992.98 4,992.98
63001 06/22/00 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CRC 190-182-999-5212 40.73
63001 06/22/00 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:CRC 190-182-999-5212 285.32 326.05
63002 06/22/00 CRP EHA - SOUTHERN OUES:CRP EMA-SOUTHERN:H.PARKER 190-180-999-5226 25.00 25.00
63003 06/22/00 002954 OIAMONO GARAGE OODR INC RES IMPROVE:PARSON,JASON&HIRIA 165-199-813-5804 595.00 595.00
63004 06/22/00 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK APR 2000 SPECIAL EVENT PREMIUM 300-2180 546.42 546.42
63005 06/22/00 002981 OYNA MEO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 19.07 19.07
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/19 MEN002A 340-199-701-5118 309.40
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/19 MENDOZA 340-199-702-5118 132.60
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/19 COMERCHERO 320-199-999-5118 1,934.96
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/19 MENDOZA 330-199-999-5118 143.70
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 5/19 MENDOZA 330-199-999-5118 364.60
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 6/2 MENOOZA 330-199-999-5118 615.86
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 6/2 MEN002A 340-199-701-5118 309.40
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 6/2 MEN002A 340-199-702-5118 132.60
63006 06/22/00 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 6/2 COHERCHERO 320-199-999-5118 1,936.48 5,879.60
63007 06/22/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5215 1,133.08
63007 06/22/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SALES TAX 340-199-701-5215 87.81
63007 06/22/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5215 1,165.00
63007 06/22/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SALES TAX 340-199-701-5215 90.29
63007 06/22/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP ELECTRICAL SUPP:PALOMA DEL SOL 190-180-999-5212 124.80
63007 06/22/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 9.67
63007 06/22/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP ELECTRICAL SUPP:VARlOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5212 86.20 2,696.85
63008 06/22/00 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R COMPUTER SOFTWARE 001-1990 2,397.68 2,397.68
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR losep SVCS:PALOMA DEL SOL 190-180-999-5212 120.00
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE S-3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS LANDSCAPE 193-180-999-5212 1,500.00
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 5-GAL. PHOTINIAS. 193-180-999-5212 225.00
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE 5-GAL. PYROCANTHA. 193-180-999-5212 450.00
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 1-GAL. ACACIA. 193-180-999-5212 500.00
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSe? SVCS:RNCHO SPORTS PK 190-180-999-5212 517.99
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSCP SVCS:SPORTS PARK 190-180-999-5212 43.92
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSCP SVCS:TEM MIDDLE SCH 190-180-999-5212 1,075.00
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS:RAN VISTA RO 193-180-999-5212 244.30
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSCP SVCS:MEAOOWS PKWY 193-180-999-5212 39.86
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LOSCP SVCS:RAN VISTA RO 193-180-999-5212 229.15
63009 06/22/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE HAY LOSCP SVCS:TEM MIDDLE SCH 190-180-999-5212 1,075.00 6,020.22
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERlOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER . DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63010 06122/00 002037 EXPANETS PHONE MNTC & REPAIRS:CITY HALL 320-199-999-5215 48.00 48.00
63011 06/22/00 000478 FAST SIGNS EXHIBITION TITLE ~ALL LETTERS 190-185-999-5301 37.51
63011 06122/00 000478 FAST SIGNS PROF SVCS:MAP OVERLAY 001-164-604-5250 112.00
63011 06122/00 000478 FAST SIGNS SALES TAX 001-164-6G4-5250 8.68 158.19
63012 06/22/00 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO LOT BOOK:31166 SAHO CT 165-199-813-5804 150.00 150.00
63013 06/22/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-3083 MN:GEN PLN SUBCOMMITEE 001-100-999-5260 4.76
63013 06122/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-2576 S.N. :UPOTE CTY ISSUES 001-110-999-5260 13.98
63013 06122/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-5288 S.JONES:MINOSPRING 320-199-999-5211 356_53
63013 06/22/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-5288 SJ PUB:CA MUNI L~ UPOT 001-120-999-5228 60.00
63013 06/22/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-5288 SJ:COUNCIL ~ORKSHOP 001-100-999-5260 334.48
63013 06/22/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-6702 J.MEYER:R 0 A MTG 165-199-999-5260 15.50
63013 06/22/00 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-6702 J.MEYER:INVW PNL 165-199-999-5260 57.00 844.25
63014 06/22/00 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 001-150,999-5250 1,025.00 1,025.00
63015 06/22/00 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - ~ 002982 ST OED 001-2140 202.80 202.80
63016 06/22/00 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA - PAYM JUNE XXX-0073 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 1,810.93
63016 06/22/00 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA - PAYM JUNE XXX-0074 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 255.73
63016 06/22/00 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA - PAYM JUNE XXX-3564 ALARM 320-199-999-5208 54.61
63016 06/22/00 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA - PAYM JUNE XXX-5072 GENERAL USAGE 320-1990 5,971.85 8,093.12
63017 06122/00 002819 GAR~IN & CHAN ASSOCIATE MISC AUDIO/VIDEO SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5210 609.33 609.33
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1990 205.62
63018 06122/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 816.80
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-100-999-5220 94.37
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 12.10-
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 62.19
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 400.33
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 75.47
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5220 306.n
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1990 489.20
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 339.31
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 653.38
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-184-999-5220 145.59
63018 06122/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5220 51.52
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-1990 84.28
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 287.64
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-160-999-5220 85.78
63018 06122/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 8.57
63018 06122/00 0001n GLENN1ES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-120-999-52n 154.72
63018 06122/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1990 279.36
63018 06/22/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-111-999-5220 407.13 4,935.93
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE ~NH35256 MONITOR EXT CABLE 6' 320-199-999-5221 149.85
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPlIE ~HN35257 MONITOR EXT CABLE 10' 320-199-999-5221 119.90
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE ~HN35259 PS2 K8/MOUSE EXT 6' 320-199-999-5221 199.75
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUM8ER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE WHN35260 PS2/MOUSE EXT 10' 320-199-999-5221 149.85
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE WHN35240 IEEE 1284 CABLE 6' 320-199-999-5221 249.90
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE WHN31803GN PATCH CABLE 7' 320-199-999-5221 149.75
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 24.95
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 80.36
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE WHN318D3BL PATCH CABLE 7' 320-199-999-5221 149_75
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 2CC32097 2lP100 PO DISK 20PK 320-199-999-5221 167.76
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 2CC30757 2lP250 PC DISK 4PK 320-199-999-5221 69.00
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 2CC30609 SONY DISKETTES 100PK 320-199-999-5221 189.90
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE 2CC25806 DLT4000 BKUP TAPE 320-199-999-5221 1,049.86
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-1990 75.57
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 128.21
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE WNH33779 INTEL 460T SWITCH 320-199-999-5221 769.00
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE WNH33779 INTEL 460T SWITCH 320-199-999-5221 769.00
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 30.66
63019 06/22/00 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 121.12 4,644.14
63020 06/22/00 003701 GRAPHIC MARKETING PRINTING OF NEWSLETTERS 001-111-999-5270 1,505.00
63020 06/22/00 003701 GRAPHIC MARKETING SALES TAX 001-111-999-5270 116.64 1,621.64
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCSD 190-180-999-5301 3.19
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HAROWARE 1NC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW MAl NT 001-164-601-5218 43.84
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 86.09
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HAROWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:CRC 190-182-999-5212 233.34
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPP:BLOG & SAFETY 001-162-999-5242 697.84
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PARKS 190-180-999-5212 394.34
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PARKS 190-180-999-5212 550.00
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC SPORTS SUPPLIES:RECREATION 190-183-999-5380 220.07
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCSD 190-180-999-5242 41.28
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCSD 190-181-999-5242 41.28
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCSD 190-182-999-5242 61.93
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCSD 190-184-999-5242 61.93
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:SENIOR CTR 190-181-999-5212 20_42
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCC 190-184-999-5212 67.74
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCC 190-184-999-5301 70_10
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS 001-163-999-5218 500.00
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS 001-163-999-5218 225.00
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS 001-163-999-5218 123.70
63021 06/22/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 1NC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PUBLIC WORKS 001-163-999-5218 225_00 3,667.09
63022 06/22/00 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM 001-1990 438.00 438.00
63023 06/22/00 003844 HERITAGE MEDIA CORPORAT AD SAN DIEGO RELOCATION GUIDE 001-111-999-5270 2,715.75 2,715.75
63024 06/22/00 003972 HOHNS GUTTERWORK RES IMPROVE:SAUCEDO, MARTIN 165-199-613-5804 116.50 116.50
63025 06/22/00 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE GRAPHIC DESIGN:NEWSLETTER 001-111-999-5270 254.24 254.24
63026 06/22/00 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF CaMP 001-2080 2,118.11
63026 06/22/00 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT fRUS 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 375.52
63026 06/22/00 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 193-2080 30_01
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CNECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63026 06/22/00 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 194-20BO 21.37
63026 06/22/00 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP 300-2080 25.00 2,570.01
63027 06/22/00 001573 INLAND EMPIRE TOURISM C TRAVEL WRITER FAMILY TOUR 001-111-999-5270 2,200.00 2,200.00
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5212 115.80
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY PooL SUPPL PooL SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5250 121. 25
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY PooL SUPPL PooL SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5212 72.38
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5250 75.78
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5212 180.38
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY PooL SUPPL PooL SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5250 188.88
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY PooL SUPPL PooL SUPPLI ES: CRC 190-182-999-5212 86.85
63028 06/22/00 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SUPPLIES: CRC 190-182-999-5250 90.94 932.26
63029 06/22/00 004079 JENKENS & GILEHRIST LEGAL SVCS FOR HUMAN RESOURCES 001-130-999-5247 252.00 252.00
63030 06/22/00 004173 JOBTRAK CORPORATION ADS FOR RECREATION POSITIONS 001-150-999-5254 380.00 380.00
63031 06/22/00 003181 JON EDWAROS & ASSOCIATE PHOTOS FOR TRADE SHOW BOOTH 001-111-999-5270 2,165.00 2,165.00
63032 06/22/00 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SERVICES TEMP HELP W/E 5/21 MUELLER 330-199-999-5118 179.62 179.62
63033 06/22/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC SR CTR REPAIR HVAC UNITS 190-181-999-5250 124.00
63033 06/22/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC-REPAIR VARIOUS HVAC UNITS 190-182-999-5212 80.00
63033 06/22/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC-REPAIR VARIOUS HVAC UNITS 190-182-999-5212 208.00
63033 06/22/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC-REPAIR VARIOUS HVAC UNITS 190-182-999-5212 498.00
63033 06/22/00 004104 K I NETI C SYSTEMS INC CRC-REPAIR VARIOUS HVAC UNITS 190-182-999-5212 760.00
63033 06/22/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC-REPAIR VARIOUS HVAC UNITS 190-182-999-5212 514.00
63033 06/22/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC-REPAIR VARIOUS HVAC UNITS 190-182-999-5212 520.00
63033 06/22/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC CRC - REPAIR HVAC UNITS 190-182-999-5212 351.00 3,055.00
63034 06/22/00 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 190'183-999-5370 57.50
63034 06/22/00 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5222 287.69
63034 06/22/00 000206 KINKOS INC STATIONERY PAPER/MISC SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 86.20 431.39
63035 06/22/00 003631 KLEINFELDER INC MAY GEOTECH SVCS:PALA RD BRIDG 210-165-631-5801 910.00 910.00
63036 06/22/00 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV CF:LIBRARY CONF/SACRA/PR/AA 190-180-999-5258 426.00 426.00
63037 06/22/00 004174 LI GHT IMPRESSIONS LIGHTING EQUIPMENT 190-185-999-5610 1,015.75
63037 06/22/00 004174 Ll GHT IMPRESSIONS FREIGHT 190-185-999-5610 38_48
63037 06/22/00 004174 LI GHT IMPRESSIONS SALES TAX 190-185-999-5610 73.64 1,127.87
63038 06/22/00 000996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC PUB:CA LAND USE 2000 UPDATE 001-100-999-5228 99.26 99.26
63039 06/22/00 004141 MAINTEX INC CITY HAll 20" FLOOR BURNISHER 340-199-701-5610 1,056.55
63039 06/22/00 004141 MAINTEX INC SALES TAX 340-199-701-5610 81.88 1,138.43
63040 06/22/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 6/04 EBON 340-199-701-5118 224.00
63040 06/22/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 6/11 MCCLANAHAN 001-161-999-5118 435.38
63040 06/22/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 6/11 EBON 340-199-701-5118 336_00 995.38
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERlOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENOOR VENOOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER OATE NUMBER NAME OESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOONT AMOONT
63041 06/22/00 003669 MARC FAULKENBURY PAINTI RES IMPRV PRGM: J. RIVERA 165-199-813-5804 600.00 600.00
63042 06/22/00 004107 MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA TEMP HELP 6/06-14 MASSA-LAVITT 001-161-999-5248 2,275.00 2,275 .00
63043 06/22/00 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM JUN LEASE OF COPIER AT CRC 190-182-999-5239 162.70 162.70
63044 06/22/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS. CAROS: O. ROCKHOLT 001-161-999-5222 102.50
63044 06/22/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-161-999-5222 7.94 110_44
63045 06/22/00 001067 MITY LITE INC 8FT & 6FT TABLES FOR TCC & CRC 190-182-999-5242 1,036.04
63045 06/22/00 001067 MITY LITE INC 8FT & 6FT TABLES FOR TCC & CRC 190-184-999-5242 1,861.96
63045 06/22/00 001067 MITY LITE 1NC SALES TAX 190-184-999-5240 210.11 3,108.11
63046 06/22/00 003715 MORTON TRAFFIC MARKINGS STENCIL PAINT FOR STENCIL TRK 001-164-601-5218 1,115.22 1,115.22
63047 06/22/00 001986 MUSI CAL AUOIO ENVIRONM CRC TROUBLE SHOOT SOUNO SYSTEM 190-182-999-5212 1,050.00 1,050.00
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-100-999-5265 227.06
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-101-999-5280 227.06
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-111-999-5270 227.06
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-100-999-5265 11.89
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-100-999-5265 21.44
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-101 '999-5280 21.44
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-111-999-5270 21.44
63048 06/22/00 002995 MYRON MANUFACTURING COR PENS FOR CITY PROMOTIONAL PRGM 001-100-999-5265 1. 11 758.50
63049 06/22/00 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC PARTS/SUPPLIES PW MAINT 001-164-601-5218 169.29 169.29
63050 06/22/00 NICOLAS VALLEY ELEMENTA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
63050 06/22/00 NICOLAS VALLEY ELEMENTA REFUND: AQUATICS-PUBLIC SWIM 190-183-4975 15.75 115.75
63051 06/22/00 004191 NORTH COUNTY TIMES-PMT ANNUAL SU8SCRIPTION:#120994 001-1990 90.00 90.00
63052 06/22/00 002292 OASIS VENDING COFFEE/KITCHEN SUPPL:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 216.69
63052 06/22/00 002292 OASIS VENDING COFFEE/KITCHEN SUPPL:CITY HALL 340- 199-701 -5250 176.90
63052 06/22/00 002292 OASIS VENDING COFFEE/KITCHEN SUPPL:MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5250 77.58 473.17
63053 06/22/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S DRAFT CHAIR FOR PW OEPT 001-165-999-5242 101.01
63053 06/22/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S SALES TAX 001-165-999-5242 7.83 106.84
63054 06/22/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 001-164-601-5214 723.18
63054 06/22/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 66.30
63054 06/22/00 002105 OLO TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 19.19
63054 06/22/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 68.74
63054 06/22/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 81.65
63054 06/22/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-164-601-5214 82.18 1,041.24
63055 06/22/00 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAN DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 401.01 401.01
63056 06/22/00 004045 ORVAC ELECTRONICS MISC A/V ELECTRONIC EQUIP 320-199-999-5210 694.83 694.83
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUM8ER OATE NUMBER NAME DESCR I PH ON NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63057 06/22/00 004154 PACIFIC LIGHTING SALES DETECTOR TOOL-170 CABINET:PW 001-164-602-5242 215.00
63057 06/22/00 004154 PACIFIC LIGHTING SALES SALES TAX 001-164-602-5242 16.66 231.66
63058 06/22/00 002331 PEP BOYS INC MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CRW 001-164-601-5218 19.91
63058 06/22/00 002331 PEP BOYS INC MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CRW 001-164-601-5218 160.00 179.91
63059 06/22/00 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 001-2122 154.60 154.60
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5260 20.00
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5220 5.38
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260 5.25
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT 001-162-999-5261 50.00
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 46.87
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT 001-111-999-5250 10.95
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-1990 21.50
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5222 17.95
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5261 58.00
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5261 1.82
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 210-190-147-5804 5.48
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-1990 40.00
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5260 26.22
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 30.00
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5261 50.00
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-1990 37.57
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-1990 27.50
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 12.93
63060 06/22/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 24.24 491.66
63061 06/22/00 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW MAINT 001-164-601-5238 56.22
63061 06/22/00 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR PW MAINT 001-164-601-5238 204.74 260.96
63062 06/22/00 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC MAY CELLULAR SVC:SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 46.29
63062 06/22/00 002776 PRIME MATRIX INC MAY CELLULAR SVC:CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 28.77 75.06
63063 06/22/00 002880 PRO-CRAFT SASH & SUPPLY RES IMPRV PRGM: M. PARSON 165-199-813-5804 1,300.00 1,300.00
63064 06/22/00 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS IN WASTE CONTAINER LINERS:MARG PK 190-180-999-5212 140.00
63064 06/22/00 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS IN SALES TAX 190-180-999-5212 10.85 150.85
63065 06/22/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL 8LUEPRINTS:PALA RD BRIOGE 210-165-631-5804 18.13
63065 06/22/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:MUR CRK BRIDGE 210-165-707-5802 3.63
63065 06/22/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:R.C.BRDG IMPRV 001-165-999-5250 734.45
63065 06/22/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUP BLUEPRINTS:WINCH BRDG IMPR 001-165-999-5250 667_67 1,423.88
63066 06/22/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:VARlOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 3,025.07
63066 06/22/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:VARlOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 193.00
63066 06/22/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN:VARlOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 1,843.44 5,061.51
63067 06/22/00 002907 REINHART FONTES ASSOCIA PROP APPRAISAL-KID MUSEUM SITE 210-190-165-5802 4,500.00 4,500.00
63068 06/22/00 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSH APR 2000 LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 234.00 234.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63069 06/22/00 RIVERA, TERESA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00
63069 06/22/00 RIVERA, TERESA ADD'L ROOM RENTAL 190-183-4990 60.00- 40.00
63070 06/22/00 00041B RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES 001-163-999-5250 5.00 5.00
63071 06/22/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW TEM RODEO PATROL 5/27-28/00 001-170-999-5370 1,093.62 1,093.62
63072 06/22/00 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. REIMB:ACTION DAY CF:5/22-23/00 001-100-999-5258 18.24 18.24
63073 06/22/00 RYLAND HOMES REFUND:OVRPMT FEES:LDOO-065GR 001-2670 850.00 850.00
63074 06/22/00 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SVCS:TEMEKU HILLS PK 190-180-999-5212 150.62
63074 06/22/00 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES 190-182-999-5212 35.00
63074 06/22/00 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH SR CTR LOCKSMITH SVCS 190-181-999-5212 3.40 189.02
63075 06/22/00 SALDANA, MARIA REFUND: FACILITY RENTAL 190-183-4990 299.00 299.00
63076 06/22/00 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI JUN CUSTODIAL SVCS:PRKS/6TH ST 190-180-999-5250 2,310.00
63076 06/22/00 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI JUN CUSTODIAL SVCS:PRKS/6TH ST 001-164-603-5250 210.00
63076 06/22/00 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI JUN CUSTODIAL SVCS:TEMEKU HILL 190-180-999-5250 420.00
63076 06/22/00 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI JUN CUSTODIAL SVCS:TVHS 190-180-999-5250 210.00
63076 06/22/00 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI JUN CUSTODIAL SVCS:DUCK POND 190-180-999-5250 210.00
63076 06/22/00 003801 SELF'S JANITORIAL SERVI JUN CUSTODIAL SVCS:PICN.SHELTR 190-180-999-5212 400.00 3,760.00
63077 06/22/00 004103 SKY ADVERTISING INC RECRUIT AD:AQUATICS MGR 001-150-999-5254 348.92 348.92
63078 06/22/00 000645 SMART & FINAL INC REFRSHMNTS-MAKE DIFFERENCE DAY 194-180-999-5254 97.61
63078 06/22/00 000645 SMART & FINAL INC TCC REC SUPPLIES 190-184-999-5301 102.60
63078 06/22/00 000645 SMART & FINAL INC MISC REC SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 141.70
63078 06/22/00 000645 SMART & FINAL INC DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5340 447.58
63078 06/22/00 000645 SMART & FINAL INC EMPL RECOGN PRGM SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5265 143.22 932.71
63079 06/22/00 003002 SMooTHILL SPORTS DISTRI RECTOR ELBOW PADS LARGE 190-183-999-5305 223.30
63079 06/22/00 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS DISTRI RECTOR KNEE PADS LARGE 190-183-999-5305 256.50
63079 06/22/00 003002 SMOOTNILL SPORTS DISTRI RECTOR WRIST GUARDS LARGE 190-183-999-5305 187.50
63079 06/22/00 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS DISTRI RECTOR WRIST GUARDS MEDIUM 190-183-999-5305 375.00
63079 06/22/00 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS DISTRI SALES TAX 190-183-999-5305 95.28 1,137.58
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-13-079-2377:HWY 79 191-180-999-5319 200.16
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CAll F ED I SON MAY:2-19-466-2627:PI0 PIca RD 191-180-999-5319 102.94
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CALlF EDISON JUN:2-19-249-3989:VARIOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5319 175.49
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-07-626-6063:RANCHO VISTA 193-180-999-5240 12.96
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CAll F EDISON JUN:2-02-351-6600:VARlOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5240 39_28
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CAll F EDISON JUN:2-19-999-9442:VARlOUS MTRS 191-180-999-5319 911.39
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CAll F EDISON MAY:2-19-335-9700:HWY 79 191-180-999-5319 67.29
63080 06/22/00 000537 SO CAll F ED I SON JUN:2-18-373-9903:MARGARITA 190-180-999-5240 462.90 1,972.41
63081 06/22/00 001212 SO CAll F GAS COMPANY. JUN:021-725-0775-4:SR CTR 190-181-999-5240 25.77
63081 06/22/00 001212 SO CAll F GAS COMPANY JUN:091-024-9300-5:CRC 190-182-999-5240 970.27
63081 06/22/00 001212 SO CAll F GAS COMPANY JUN:l01-525-0950-0:TCC 190-184-999-5240 29.10
63081 06/22/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:133-040-7373-0:MAINT FAC 340-199-702-5240 25.77
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER I ODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63081 06/22/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:181-383-8881-6:MUSEUM 190-185-999-5240 31.60 1,082.51
63082 06/22/00 SPAYED, K.R. RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 300-199-999-5207 1,526.38 1,526.38
63083 06/22/00 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET C CITY HALL CLEAN 25 CHAIRS 340-199-701-5212 75.00 75.00
63084 06/22/00 000574 SUPER TONER HP PRINTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 58.19
63084 06/22/00 000574 SUPER TONER HP PRINTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 828.85
63084 06/22/00 000574 SUPER TONER JUN LASER PRINTER MAINTENANCE 320-199-999-5215 625.00 1,512.04
63085 06/22/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR KITE DAY 190-183-999-5370 93_43
63085 06/22/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT 001-164-604-5220 173.67
63085 06/22/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW DEPT 001-165-999-5220 34_73
63085 06/22/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR AQUATICS 190-183-999-5310 120.91
63085 06/22/00 000305 TARGET STORE CREDIT: ITEMS RETURNED 001-164-604-5220 160.73-
63085 06/22/00 000305 TARGET STORE CREOIT: ITEMS RETURNED 001-165-999-5220 32.15- 229.86
63086 06/22/00 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P CRC PLUMBING SERVICES 190-182-999-5212 55.00
63086 06/22/00 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P PLUMBING SVC:PALOMA DEL SOL PK 190-180-999-5212 55.00 110.00
63087 06/22/00 000308 TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATI CDA CONF:K.WILLIAMS:9/22-24 280-199-999-5261 572.00 572.00
63088 06/22/00 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER T.V. TECH EXPO SPONSORSHIP 001-111-999-5266 1,250.00 1,250.00
63089 06/22/00 THE LINFIELD SCHooL REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00
63090 06/22/00 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL MAINT SUPPLIES FOR PATCH TRUCK 001-164-601-5214 88.07 88.07
63091 06/22/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 001-2080 8,232.87
63091 06/22/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 165-2080 91.16
63091 06/22/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 190-2080 1,396.21
63091 06/22/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF CaMP) 001065 OEF COMP 193-2080 46.67
63091 06/22/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 OEF COMP 280-2080 91.16
63091 06/22/00 001065 U S C M WEST (OEF COMP) 001065 OEF COMP 300-2080 83.33
63091 06/22/00 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 320-2080 433.33
63091 06/22/00 001065 u S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DE F COMP 340-2060 167.03 10,541. 76
63092 06/22/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETI R 001-2160 957.94
63092 06/22/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 165-2160 95.34
63092 06/22/00 000389 USCMWEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160 1,443.05
63092 06/22/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETI R 193-2160 23.38
63092 06/22/00 000389 USCMWEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETI R 280-2160 26.60
63092 06/22/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETI R 320-2160 42.96
63092 06/22/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETI R 330-2160 34.16
63092 06/22/00 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETI R 340-2160 45.00 2,668.43
63093 06/22/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 284.25
63093 06/22/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 11.00
63093 06/22/00 000325 UN ITEO WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 30_60
63093 06/22/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 1.60
63093 06/22/00 000325 UN ITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .20
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECUlA PAGE 11
06/22/00 13:51 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR All PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63093 06/22/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 280-2120 3.50
63093 06/22/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 300-2120 1.25
63093 06/22/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 4.00
63093 D6/22/00 DD0325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 330-2120 2.50
63093 06/22/00 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340.2120 .60 339.50
63094 06/22/00 004149 VMS VIDEO MONITORING EYE ON lA KABC-TV VIDEO MAY 6 001-111-999-5270 120.00
63094 06/22/00 004149 VMS VIDEO MONITORING FREIGHT 001-111-999-5270 6.50
63094 06/22/00 004149 VMS VIDEO MONITORING SALES TAX 001-111-999-5270 9.30 135.80
63095 06/22/00 001890 VORTEX DOORS INSTAll:TEM VAllEY MUSEUM 190-185-999-5250 429.75 429.75
63096 06/22/00 001881 WATER SAFETY PROOUCTS I FOX 40 WHISTLE - RED 190-183-999-5310 63.00
63096 06/22/00 001881 WATER SAFETY PROOUCTS I FUll lENGTH lANYARD - RED 190-183-999-5310 16.20
63096 06/22/00 001881 WATER SAFETY PROOUCTS I JUNIOR liFEGUARD T-SHIRTS 190-183-999-5310 99.00
63096 06/22/00 001881 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS I FREIGHT CHARGES - INV# 31484 190-183-999-5310 4.80
63096 06/22/00 001B81 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS I liFEGUARD UNIFORMS/SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 24.60 207.60
63097 06/22/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 83.68
63097 06/22/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY MAINT FAC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 340-199-702-5212 25.48 109.16
63098 06/22/00 001650 WEARGUARO CORPORATION MAINT FIELD COATS lG/XlG-TCSD 190-180-999-5243 204.87 204.87
63099 06/22/00 003063 WEAVER PACIFIC PUBlICAT WNTR/SPR VISITOR POCKET GUIOES 001-111-999-5270 2,999.66
63099 06/22/00 003063 WEAVER PACIFIC PUBlICAT SUM/FAll VISITOR POCKET GUIDES 001-111-999-5270 2,999.66 5,999.72
63100 06/22/00 003730 WEST COAST ARBOR!STS IN S-8 VillAGES B/TREE TRIMMING 193-180-999-5415 2,548.00
63100 06/22/00 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN lOSCP RooT PRUNING 193-180-999-5415 182.00
63100 06/22/00 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN FACiliTIES RooT PRUNING 193-180-999-5212 250.00
63100 06/22/00 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING MAl NT 001-164-601-5402 56.00 3,036.00
63101 06/22/00 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CITY HAll lEGAL PUBLICATIONS 001-120-999-5228 51.72 51. 72
63102 06/22/00 000341 WIllDAN ASSOCIATES INC APR ENG SVCS: PAlA RO IMPRV 210-165-668-5802 1,050.50
63102 06/22/00 000341 WlllDAN ASSOCIATES INC APR TRF SGNl DESIGN SVCS:PAlA 210-165-701-5802 538.50
63102 06/22/00 000341 WlllDAN ASSOCIATES INC APR TRF SGNl DESIGN SVCS:PAlA 210-165-702-5B02 53B.50 2,127.50
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll MAY BASE CHARGE:5343 COPIER 330-199-999-5217 242.77
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll JUN METER USAGE:5765 COPIER 330-199-999-5239 352.55
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll XEROX EQUIP SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 1,183.10
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bill! XEROX MACHINE SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 1,625.00
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BIlll APR lEASE OF (3) 5365 COPIERS 330-2800 1,276.31
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll APR lEASE OF DC240 COPIER 330-2800 354.09
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll APR INTEREST OF lEASED COPIERS 330-199-999-5391 550.10
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll APR POOLED MAINT OF COPIERS 330-199-999-5217 4,373.22
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll APR lEASE OF TCC COPIER 190-184-999-5239 120.54
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bllll APR lEASE OF 5800 COPIER 330-2800 1,662.30
63103 06/22/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION Bill! APR lEASE OF 5800 COPIER 330-199-999-5391 719.17 12,459.15
63104 06/22/00 004110 YUCAIPA ROOFING INC RES IMPRV PROM: D. ALBERT 165-199-813-5804 4,695.00 4.695.00
TOTAL CHECKS 215,838.03
VlXJCHRE2
06/29/00 16:29
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHERICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE 3
FUND TITLE AMOUNT
001 GENERAL FUND 881,497.79
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES OISTRICT 49,147.00
193 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C 22,253.00
194 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL 0 1,158,309.00
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 687,673.03
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY . CIP 113,878.29
340 FACILITIES 541. 00
TOTAL 2,913,299.11
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 1
06/29/00 16:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICIOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63252 07/11/00 003567 C C MYERS INC JUN PRGS PMT#14:0VERLAND:95-11 210-165-604-5804 432,476.85
63252 07/11/00 003567 C C MYERS INC JUN PRGS PMT#14:0VERLAND:95-11 210-165-604-5804 67,523.15
63252 07/11/00 003567 C C MYERS INC RET W/H PMT#14:0VERLAND:95-11 210-2035 50,000.00-
63252 07/11/00 003567 C C MYERS INC JUN PRGS PMT#13:0VERLANO:95-11 210-165-604-5804 15,820.00
63252 07/11/00 003567 C C MYERS INC RET-W/H PMT#13:0VERLAND:95-11 210-2035 4,412.10-
63252 07/11/00 003567 C C MYERS INC JUN PRGS PMT#13:0VERLAND:95-11 210-165-604-5804 28,301.04 489,708.94
63253 07/11/00 002932 CROWN CARPET & DRAPERIE INSTALL NEW CARPET/NEW BASE CV 190-182-999-5610 9,904.00 9,904.00
63254 07/11/00 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R JUNE CONSULTING SERVICES 001-161-610-5248 5,680.00 5,680.00
63255 07/11/00 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION MAY PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-162-999-5248 9,771.52 9,771.52
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:VARIOUS PARKS 190-180-999-5415 11,529.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:NORTH SLOPE ARA 193-180-999-5415 8,876.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS:SOUTH SLOPE ARA 193-180-999-5415 13,375.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS:SPORTS PK AREA 190-180-999-5415 21,725.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:CRC 190-162-999-5415 1,444.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:SENIOR CTR 190-161-999-5415 361.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5415 541.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:TCC 190-184-999-5415 193.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:OLD TOWN PK LOT 001-1990 250.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:OLD TOWN 001-1990 987.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:FIRE STATION 84 001-171-999-5212 400.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:VIA EOUARDO 190-180-999-5415 106.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:TEMECULA MUSEUM 190-185-999-5415 285.00
63256 07/11/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS:TEMEKU HILLS PK 190-180-999-5415 3,600.00 63,674.00
63257 07/11/00 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA MAY PRF SVC-MARGARITA RD:99-01 210-165-706-5802 835.73-
63257 07/11/00 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA MAY PRF SVC-MARGARITA RD:99-01 210-165-713-5802 79.27-
63257 07/11/00 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA MAY PRF SVC.MARGARITA RD:99-01 210-165-706-5802 12,458.37
63257 07/11/00 003815 GFB FRIEDRICH & ASSOCIA MAY PRF SVC-MARGARITA RD:99-01 210-165-713-5802 1,181.63 12,725.00
63258 07/11/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGS PMT#15:PALA BR:97-15 210-165-631-5804 15,920.00
63258 07/11/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGS PMT#15:PALA BR:97-15 210-165-631-5804 62,120.50
63258 07/11/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGS PNT#6:BIKE TRAIL:9725 210-190-147-5804 21,436.60
63258 07/11/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION RET H/W PMT#6:BIKE TRAIL:97-25 210-2035 4,394.10-
63258 07/11/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGS PNT#6:BIKE TRAIL:9725 210-190-147-5604 22,504.20
63258 07/11/00 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION RET W/H 5X-TOTAL CONTRACT AMT 210-2035 19,395.37- 98,192.03
63259 07/11/00 003676 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION-ES REL RET-ESCROW:PALA BRG:97-15 210-1035 19,395.37 19,395.37
63260 07/11/00 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC SUMMER NIGHT BANNERS 280-199-999-5271 5,914.29 5,914.29
63261 07/11/00 003986 KEVIN COZAD & ASSOCIATE MAY PROF SVCS:PALA BRIG 97-15 210-165-631-5602 6,995.39 6,995.39
63262 07/11/00 004051 LOR GEOTECHNICAL GROU MAY GEOTECH SVCS:1ST ST EXT 280-199-607-5804 9,568.00 9,568.00
63263 07/11/00 001719 L P A INC MAY PROF SVCS-TEMECULA LIBRARY 210-199-129-5602 35,844.30 35,844.30
63264 07/11/00 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI MAY SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 6,602.64 8,602.64
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
06/29/00 16:29 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHERI
CHECK CHECK VEHOOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAIlE OESCR I PTl ON NUMBER AmUNT AIlOUNT
63265 07111/00 004136 MARATHON GENERAL INC 9072 S.F. A.C. PAVING:MOWS PKW 210-165-655-5804 24,612.00 24,612.00
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170,999,5288 228,762.48
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5299 48,870.88
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5298 38,912.00
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001,170-999,5294 9,967.10
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5300 19,456.00
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5291 17,529.90
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-1230 5,843.30
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5261 25,156.40
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5262 19,992.15
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5279 6,632.83
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 MAR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5297 14,934.40
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5288 219,706.11
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5299 48,129.60
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5298 38,668.60
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CD SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5294 9,728.00
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CD SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5300 19,456.00
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5291 14,814.00
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-1230 4,938.00
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5281 24,933.10
63266 07111/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5262 18,684.72
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5279 5,556.46
63266 07/11/00 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 0 APR LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 001-170-999-5297 14,934.40 855,606.63
63267 07/11/00 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RET W/H PMT#3:1ST ST BR:95-08 260-2035 9,905.60-
63267 07/11/00 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION MAY PRGS PMT#3:1ST ST BR:95-08 260-199-807-5804 99,056.00
63267 07/11/00 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CR:ADKAN ENG SURVEY SVCS:95-08 280-199-807-5804 660.00- 88,490.40
63268 07/11/00 004186 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION- REL RET'ESCROW:1ST ST BR:95-08 280-1035 9,905.60 9,905.60
63269 07111/00 001035 TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL JAN-JUN WASTE HAULING SVCS 194-180-999-5315 1,152,101.00
63269 07111/00 001035 TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL JAN-JUN WASTE HAULING SVCS 194-1990 6,208.00 1,158,309.00
TOTAL CHECKS 2,913,299.11
VOUCHRE2
06/29/00 15:35
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
165 ROA OEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIOE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES OISTRICT
191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL 0
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 13
AMOUNT
114,111.78
1,312.74
36,784.32
2,508.34
8,279.90
81.71
64,509.84
5,228.06
150.03
2,236.89
11,213.69
10,288.15
3,172.17
259,877.62
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECUlA PAGE 1
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR All PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
62956 06/27/00 001264 COSTCO ~HOlESAlE QUARTERLY EMPLOYEE lUNCHEON 001-150-999-5265 161. 16 161.16
253154 06/29/00 0002B3 I NSTATAX (IRS) 0002B3 FEDERAL 001-2070 4,727.61
253154 06/29/00 0002B3 I NSTATAX (IRS) 0002B3 FEDERAL 165-2070 152.12
253154 06/29/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 918.50
253154 06/29/00 000283 I NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 48_16
253154 06/29/00 000283 I NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 2BO-2070 50.71
253154 06/29/00 000283 I NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 12.07
253154 06/29/00 000283 I NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 344.14
253154 06/29/00 000283 I NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 141. 70
253154 06/29/00 0002B3 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 001-2070 1,294.22
253154 06/29/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 58.50
253154 06/29/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 243.52
253154 06/29/DD DD0283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 14.61
253154 06/29/DD 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 .3D
253154 06/29/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 00D283 MEDICARE 280-2D7D 25.9D
253154 D6/29/00 OD0283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 11.16
253154 D6/29/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) DD0283 MEDICARE 320-2070 59.88
253154 06/29/00 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 53.65 8,156.75
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EOO) 000444 STATE 001-2070 1,463.33
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EOO) 000444 STATE 165-2070 40.36
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EOO) 000444 STATE 190-2070 226.03
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 8.81
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 13.45
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 1.55
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 67.91
253200 06/29/00 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 31.55 1,652.99
63115 06/29/00 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI STAFF SHIRTS-~HITE, DAY CAMP 190-183-999-5340 1,810.20 1,810.20
63116 06/29/00 003213 A M S PLANNING RESEARCH MAY KID MUSEUM FEASIBIlTY STDY 210-190-165-5802 4,000.00 4,000.00
63117 06/29/00 004054 ADKISDN ENGINEERS INC APR PROF SVCS:1ST ST EXT 95-08 280-199-807-5804 660.00 660.00
63118 06/29/00 003568 ADVANTAGE BUSINESS EQUI CK SIGNER ANNUAL SVC CONTRACT 001-140-999-5250 259.00 259.00
63119 06/29/00 000440 AGLOW PHOTDGRAPHY REPRINTS OF COUNCIL PHOTOS 001-100-999-5250 106.67 106.67
63120 06/29/00 003607 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SA FIRST AID SUPPlIES-CRC 190-182-999-5301 132.40 132.40
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV MAY MAT/TOWEL RENTAl,CITY HAll 340-199-701-5250 83.40
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV MAY MAT/TOWEL RENTAl:P~ MAINT 340-199-702-5250 34.20
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV MAY MAT/TOWEL RENTAl:SNR CTR 190-181-999-5250 36.96
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV MAY MAT/TO~EL RENTAl:CRC 190-182-999-5250 101.28
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFDRM SERV MAY MAT/TO~El RENTAl:TCC 190-184-999-5250 51.36
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS FOR TCSD MAINT 190-180-999-5243 70.00
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS FOR P~ MAINT 001-164-601-5243 94.96
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV CR:NO CHG FOR PREP PER AGRMNT 001-164-601-5243 21. 00-
63121 06/29/00 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV CR:BIllED T~ICE-DA~SON/ZINN 190-182-999-5250 17.96- 433.20
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2
06/29/00 15,35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCR I PTl ON NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63122 06/29/00 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE V MAY ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 001-172-999-5255 4,481.95 4,481.95
63123 06/29/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 5/27 REID 001-1990 596.70
63123 06/29/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/3 SAVAGE 001-161-999-5118 257.40
63123 06/29/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/10 REID 001-110-999-5118 471.90
63123 06/29/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/10 WEST HAVER 001-162-999-5118 421. 20
63123 06/29/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/10 BRUNER 001-163-999-5118 192.00
63123 06/29/00 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 6/10 BRUNER 001-165-999-5118 192.00 2,131.20
63124 06/29/00 8ARBA, ELVIRA REFUND:PICNIC SHELTER 190-183-4988 30.00 30.00
63125 06/29/00 BARNES, KEN REFUND , PARENT/ME SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
63126 06/29/00 001260 CPR S ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:J. PELLETIER 190-1990 130.00
63126 06/29/00 001260 CPR S ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:H. PARKER 190-1990 415.00
63126 06/29/00 001260 CPR S ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP:K.HARRINGTON 190-1990 125.00 670.00
63127 06/29/00 004038 CAD ZONE INC, THE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5221 299.00
63127 06/29/00 004038 CAD ZONE INC, THE FREIGHT 001-170-999-5221 10.00 309.00
63128 06/29/00 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC PROF SRVCS:SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5250 141.00 141. 00
63129 06/29/00 003047 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL 4TH OF JULY PARADE,TRANSPORTAT 190-183-999-5370 250.00 250.00
63130 06/29/00 000137 CHEVRON USA INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-604-5263 32.65
63130 06/29/00 000137 CHEVRON USA INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263 10.44
63130 06/29/00 000137 CHEVRON USA INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263 42.20
63130 06/29/00 000137 CHEVRON USA INC FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-999-5263 15.89 101.18
63131 06/29/00 002405 COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC 10KV ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGRMNT 320-199-999-5215 2,400.00
63131 06/29/00 002405 COMPUTER PROTECTION TEC 18KV ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGRMNT 320-199-999-5215 2,400.00 4,800.00
63132 06/29/00 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CRC 190-184-999-5212 151.60
63132 06/29/00 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 71.22
63132 06/29/00 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-SNR CTR 190-181-999-5212 168.74
63132 06/29/00 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-6TH ST 001-164-603-5218 291. 46
63132 06/29/00 003252 CONTRACT SERVICES CORPO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-PKS & REC 190-1990 404.71 1,087.73
63133 06/29/00 COYLE, MAURIENA REFUND:SKYHAWKS MINI-HAWKS 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00
63134 06/29/00 CREAMER, MARGO REFUND:ART/CRAFTS-CARTOONING 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00
63135 06/29/00 004123 o L PHARES & ASSOCIATES RENTAL PMT:POLICE STOREFRONT 001-1990 1,255.00 1,255.00
63136 06/29/00 004194 o L T SOLUTIONS INC AUTOCAD 2000 320-1980 2,325.00
63136 06/29/00 004194 o L T SOLUTIONS INC AUTOCAD R14 TO AUTOCAO 2000 320-1980 395.00
63136 06/29/00 004194 o L T SOLUTIONS INC SALES TAX 320-1980 210.80 2,930.80
63137 06/29/00 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP GIS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 001-161-610-5220 1,290.00
63137 06/29/00 003272 OAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP GIS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 001-161-610-5220 465.04
63137 06/29/00 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP GIS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 001-161-610-5220 338.24 2,093.28
VC1JCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHERICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHERI
CHECK CHECK VEtJDOll VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
Nu;mER DATE Nu:m.ER NAIlE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AIlOUIlT AIlDUNT
63136 06/29100 001393 DATA TICKET INC PARKING CITATION PROCESSING 001-140-999-5250 155.13
63138 06129/00 001393 DATA TICKET INC PARKING CITATION PROCESSING 001-170-999-5250 155.12 310.25
63139 06/29/00 003052 DE SMIDT, INTA JULY 4TH ENTERTAINMENT 190-183-999-5370 250.00 250.00
63140 06/29/00 0D3383 O~ER APPLIANCE SERVIC ELECTRICAL SVCS - FIRE STN 84 001-171-999-5212 99.00 99.00
63141 06/29/00 003511 DELL CQ;lPUTER CDRPORATI NOTEBOOK CQ;lPUTER FOR POLICE 001-170-999-5604 2,197.00
63141 06/29/00 003511 DELL CQ;lPUTER CORPORATI SALES TAX 001-170-999-5604 170.29
63141 06/29/00 003511 DELL CQ;lPUTER CORPORATI (3) COMPUTER SYSTEMS 001-170-999-5604 4,173.00
63141 06/29/00 003511 DELL ~PUTER CORPORATI SALES TAX 001-170-999-5604 323.44 6,663.73
63142 06/29/00 001714 OR~ ENGINEERING INC ELECTRICAL SVCS:R.C. SPORTS PK 210-190-174-5602 101.10 101.10
63143 06/29/00 001544 E L YEAGER CONSTRUCTION REL RET:115 SIB AUX LN:98-07 210-2035 50,894.24 50,894.24
63144 06/29/00 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP ELECTRICAL SUPP:CITY HALL 340-199-701 -5212 290.84 290.84
63145 06/29/00 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R C~PUTER TRAINING:J. OEGANGE 001-161-610-5261 1,600.00
63145 06/29/00 002939 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R COMPUTER TRAINING:K BEAL 001-161-610-5261 1,600.00 3,200.00
63146 06/29/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE FE8 LOSCP SVCS:VILLAGES 193-180-999-5212 248.09
63146 06/29/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAR LOSCP SVCS:SIGNET SERIES 193-180-999-5212 324.57
63146 06/29/00 001056 EXCEL LAIIOSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS:R.C./PORTOFINO 191-180-999-5415 100.00
63146 06/29/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS:MARGARITA/SOLAN 191-180-999-5415 50.00
63146 06129/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS:WINCHEST/JEFF 191-180-999-5415 100.00
63146 06/29/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS:MEOIAN AREAS 191-180-999-5415 1,250.00
63146 06/29/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LOSCP SVCS: TUSCANY RIDGE 191-1990 100.00
63146 06/29/00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE MAY LDSCP SVCS: PR~ENADE MALL 191-180-999-5415 300.00 2,4n.66
63147 06/29/00 002797 EXPERTEES SHIRTS FOR RECORDS MGMT STAFF 001-120-999-5277 337.56
63147 06/29/00 002797 EXPERTEES FREIGHT 001-120-999-5277 19.81
63147 06/29/00 002797 EXPERTEES SALES TAX 001-120-999-5277 26.16 383.53
63148 06/29/00 000478 FAST SIGNS ~NITY SAFETY SIGNS 001-170-999-5244 355.63
63148 06/29/00 000478 FAST SIGHS SALES TAX 001-170-999-5244 27.56 383.19
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 35.81
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165-999-5230 10.52
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 12.20
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-111-999-5230 37.23
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162'999-5230 34.81
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-165'999-5230 17.53
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS I NC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-120-999'5277 20.99
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-111-999-5230 13.83
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-161-999'5230 28.89
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 320-199-999-5230 12.20
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-150-999-5230 12.20
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 83.09
63149 06/29/00 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS I NC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-164-604-5230 22.n 342.02
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63150 06/29/00 003271 FORMA SYSTEMS MAY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 001-1990 4,855.00 4,855.00
63151 06/29/00 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-1990 35.56 35.56
63152 06/29/00 004052 FREDERIC R HARRIS INC MAY PROF SVCS:1ST ST BRG 95-08 280-199-807-5801 3,705.00 3,705.00
63153 06/29/00 004178 FREEOOM SIGNS BALLOON & WINE FEST SPONSER 001-111-999-5270 500.00
63153 06/29/00 004178 FREEDOM SIGNS SALES TAX 001-111-999-5270 38.75 538.75
63154 06/29/00 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA - PAYM JUN XXX-2626 POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5229 295.92
63154 06/29/00 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA - PAYM JUN XXX-3526 FIRE ALARM 320-1990 81.49
63154 06/29/00 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA - PAYM JUN XXX-6506 JEFF STONE 320-1990 25.14 402.55
63155 06/29/00 000173 GENERAL BINDING CORPORA BINDING & LAMINATION SUPPLIES 330-199-999-5220 470.26 470.26
63156 06/29/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE 001-170-999-5229 296.30
63156 06/29/00 0001n GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIRE 001-171-999-5296 72.73 369.03
63157 06/29/00 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS JAPAN TRIP VIOEO 001-101-999-5280 72.00 72.00
63158 06/29/00 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES - FIRE 001-171-999-5212 10.49 10.49
63159 06/29/00 HARRIS, PAULA REFUND:TODDLER SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
63160 06/29/00 000190 HOME BASE RES IMPROVE PGRM:COBB, DONNA 165-199-813-5804 595.13 595.13
63161 06/29/00 HUBER, LOR I REFUND:ART/CRAFTS-CARTooNING 190-183-4982 20.00 20.00
63162 06/29/00 004143 INLAND UNIFORMS UNIFORMS FOR POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5243 422.34 422.34
63163 06/29/00 001186 I RWI N, JOHN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-1990 152.00 152.00
63164 06/29/00 003223 K E A ENVIRONMENTAL, IN APR BIO SVCS-PALA RD BRG 97-15 210-165-631-5801 731.25 731.25
63165 06/29/00 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 3 RED/WHITE/BLUE BANNERS 001-111-999-5271 214.65
63165 06/29/00 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC SHIPPING CHARGES 001-111-999-5271 6.00
63165 06/29/00 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC SALES TAX 001-111-999-5271 16.64 237.29
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 4/30 CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5118 154.44
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 5/7 CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5118 207.90
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 5/7 WORSTELL 001-150-999-5118 190.08
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 5/14 CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5118 237.60
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 5/21 CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5118 285.12
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 5/28 CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5118 355.17
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 6/4 CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5118 419.27
63166 06/29/00 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 6/11 CAMMAROTA 001-111-999-5118 509.36 2,358.94
63167 06/29/00 003986 KEVIN C02AD & ASSOCIATE JUN PROF SVC-PALA RD BRG 97-15 210-165-631-5804 980.00 980.00
63168 06/29/00 002789 KIMCQ STAFFING SERVICES TEMP HELP W/E 5/28 MUELLER 330-199-999-5118 192_45
63168 06/29/00 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SERVICES TEMP HELP W/E 6/11 MUELLER 330-199-999-5118 288.68 481.13
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5
06/29/00 15,35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHERI
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 340-199-701-5250 675.00
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 340-199-702-5250 37.50
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-182-999-5250 453.75
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-184-999-5250 93.75
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-181-999-5250 37.50
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-185-999-5250 112.50
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 340-199-701-5250 675.00
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 340-199-702-5250 37.00
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-182-999-5250 453.75
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-184-999-5250 93.75
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-181-999-5250 37.50
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINTENANCE 190-185-999-5250 113.00
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINT & REPAIR,CITY HALL 340-199-702-5610 250.00
63169 06/29/00 004104 KINETIC SYSTEMS INC HVAC MAINT & REPAIR-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 132.00 3,202.00
63170 06/29/00 KING, JACOB REFUND:PARENT/ME SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
63171 06/29/00 000206 KINKOS INC AQUATICS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310 50.05 50.05
63172 06/29/00 KUPKA, YVONNE REFUND:SPORTS . BB FUND BEG 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00
63173 06/29/00 LABONTE, WILLIAM G REFUND:SPORTS-ADULT TENNIS 190-183-4982 40.00 40.00
63174 06/29/00 LAMBS FELLOWSHIP-MURRIE REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00
63175 06/29/00 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI MAY SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 1,194.30
63175 06/29/00 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI MAY SVCS-LIBRARY SYSTEM AGRMT 001-101-999-5285 45.16 1,239.46
63176 06/29/00 003274 LING AUDIO PRODUCTION S JULY 4TH - SOUND SYSTEM 190-183-999-5370 1,100.00 1,100.00
63177 06/29/00 LUCAS, JEAN REFUND:LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
63178 06/29/00 LUDWIG, ANDREA REFUND:LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975 25.00 25.00
63179 06/29/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP NELP W/E 6/18 MCCLANANAN 001-161-999-5118 164.33
63179 06/29/00 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMP NELP W/E 6/18 MCCLANANAN 001-161-999-5118 236.22 400.55
63180 06/29/00 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC LEAF DOORNANGER BROCNURES 001-172-999-5255 351.00
63180 06/29/00 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC SALES TAX 001-172-999-5255 27.20 378.20
63181 06/29/00 000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING MAY PROF SVCS:PALA RD BR:97-15 210-165-631-5802 118.20 116.20
63182 06/29/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CAROS:TEMECULA POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5222 542.50
63182 06/29/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS ADO'l BUS.CARDS:TEM POLICE OPT 001-170-999-5222 77.50
63182 06/29/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS SALES TAX 001-170-999-5222 48.05
63182 06/29/00 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS BUS.CAROS: A. ELMO 001-162-999-5222 110.44 778.49
63183 06/29/00 004162 MONSTER.COM RECRUITMENT POSTING:PLANNER 001-150-999-5254 275 .00
63183 06/29/00 004162 MONSTER. COM RECRUITMENT POSTING:ASST ENG 001-150-999-5254 275 .00
63183 06/29/00 004162 MONSTER. COM RECRUITMENT POST1NG:MGMT ANALY 001-150-999-5254 275.00 825.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHERICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHERI
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63184 06/29/00 MOORE, KRISTINE REFUND: DANCE - HAWA II AN - BEG 190-183-4982 35.00 35.00
63185 06/29/00 004128 MORAMARCO, TONY DAY CAMP STAFF TRAINING 190.1990 150.00 150.00
63186 06/29/00 002033 NATIONAL CRIME PREVENT I MCGRUFF HELP DOORKNOB SIGNS 001-170-999-5292 361.27 361.27
63187 06/29/00 003570 NORM REEVES OOOGE VAN REPAIR AC & HEATING 190-180-999-5214 108.43
63187 06/29/00 003570 NORM REEVES LABOR 190-180-999-5214 407.10 515.53
63188 06/29/00 004199 NORTH COUNTY PUMP LABOR TO PULL PUMP @ STN 84 001-171-999-5212 300.00
63188 06/29/00 004199 NORTH COUNTY PUMP LABOR TO REINSTALL PUMP 001-171-999-5212 340.00
63188 06/29/00 004199 NORTH COUNTY PUMP SALES TAX 001-171-999-5212 26.35 666.35
63189 06/29/00 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT MAY OISPLAY AOS:VAR CIP UPOTS 001-165-999-5256 565.30
63189 06/29/00 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT MAY DISPLAY AOS:PLANNING COMM 001-120-999-5254 223.87 789.17
63190 06/29/00 004191 NORTH COUNTY TIMES-PMT ANNUAL SUB:COMM SVCS:#199638 190-1990 90.00 90.00
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT FOR PO 001-170-999-5242 654.21
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT FOR PO 001-170-999-5242 146.18
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT FOR PO 001-170-999-5242 22.65
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT FOR PO 001-170-999-5242 125.51
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S DESKJET COLOR PRINTER 001-170-999'5242 99.99
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT 8USINESS S COLOR INK CARTRIDGES 001-170-999'5242 56.86
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S 6' PR t NTER CABLE 001-170-999-5242 19.50
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S SALES TAX 001-170-999-5242 13.66
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S BLACK INK CARTRIDGES 001-170-999-5242 48.34
63191 06/29/00 003964 OFFICE OEPOT BUSINESS S SALES TAX 001-170-999-5242 3.74 1,190.64
63192 06/29/00 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 935.48 935.48
63193 06/29/00 003116 aLOE SAN DIEGO GAZETTE DISPLAY AD FOR WESTERN DAYS 280-199-999-5362 500.00 500.00
63194 06/29/00 001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER RECRUITMENT AD:PLANNER 001-150-999-5254 262.91
63194 06/29/00 001619 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER RECRUITMENT AD:PLANNER 001-161-999-5254 323.54 586.45
63195 06/29/00 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY SUPPLIES FOR CITY MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5242 550.68
63195 06/29/00 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY SUPPLIES FOR CITY MEDIC SQUAD 001-171-999-5242 83.81 634.49
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC 8ELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-1990 552.89
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-110-999-5208 163.98
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-150-999-5208 128.74
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-120-999-5208 110.13
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 320-1990 357.37
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 260-199-999-5208 57.08
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-140-999-5208 57.88
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-161-999-5208 109.32
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-162-999-5208 726.79
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 190-1990 522.87
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-1990 226.79
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-164-601-5208 161.57
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-1990 107.71
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-164-604-5208 53.86
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-165-999-5208 404.39
63196 06/29/00 003021 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SER JUN CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 001-165-999-5208 .01 3,741.38
63197 06/29/00 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPLIES FOR EMP aTR LUNCHEON 001-150-999-5265 336.21 336.21
63198 06/29/00 004189 PENTAX TECHNOLOGIES POCKET JET 200 KIT 001-171-999-5604 319.95
63198 06/29/00 004189 PENTAX TECHNOLOGIES 6' PARALLEL CABLE FOR PRINTER 001-171-999-5604 33.00
63198 06/29/00 004189 PENTAX TECHNOLOGIES 12V DC CAR ADAPTER 001-171-999-5604 70.00
63198 06/29/00 004189 PENTAX TECHNOLOGIES PAPER FOR POCKET JET PRINTER 001-171-999-5604 33.96
63198 06/29/00 004189 PENTAX TECHNOLOGIES FREIGHT 001-171-999-5604 5.23 462.14
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 24,288.54
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 443.65
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 4,539.92
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 276.55
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 194-2390 81.13
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 215.23
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 124.79
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 658.32
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 147.67
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 596.07
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 PERS-PRE 001-2130 167.16
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 81.61
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 1.17
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 17.91
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 1.25
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 SURVIVOR 194-2390 .28
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RET I RE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .69
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 1.86
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93
63199 06/29/00 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETI RE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.65 31,647.84
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT 001'170-999-5214 38.84
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5220 4.85
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-161-999-5260 24.39
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-2175 15.29
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001- 1 1 0-999-5260 30.00
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 9.69
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-100-999-5260 30.00
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-181-999-5220 37.70
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 165-199-999-5260 21.81
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT 001-162-999-5220 3.78
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5220 21.84
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 47_11
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 18_88
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5260 15.00
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 19.88
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-163-999-5320 13.99
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUM8ER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-1990 7.93
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5242 8.05
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 44.93
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 15.14
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 26.21
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 24.13
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5350 14.40
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-171-999-5261 50.00
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-2175 24.41
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT 001-111-999-5260 20.00
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 210-190-165-5802 3.62
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT 210-199-129-5802 10.00
63200 06/29/00 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8URSEMENT 001-199-4070 .24 602.11
63202 06/29/00 003200 PIN CENTER, THE PROMOTIONAL CITY SEAL PINS 001-100-999-5265 1,000.00
63202 06/29/00 003200 PIN CENTER, THE PROMOTIONAL CITY SEAL PINS 001-101-999-5280 1,000.00
63202 06/29/00 003200 PIN CENTER, THE PROMOTIONAL CITY SEAL PINS 001-"'-999-5270 1,000.00
63202 06/29/00 003200 PIN CENTER, THE SHIPPING & HANDLING 001-100-999-5265 30.01
63202 06/29/00 003200 PIN CENTER, THE SHIPPING & HANDLING 001-101-999-5280 30.01
63202 06/29/00 003200 PIN CENTER, THE SHIPPING & HANDLING 001-111-999-5270 29.98 3,090.00
63203 06/29/00 002354 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS POLICE SAFETY PROMO ITEMS 001-170-999-5292 470.00
63203 06/29/00 002354 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS FREIGHT 001-170-999-5292 42.30
63203 06/29/00 002354 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS PUBLIC EDUCATION MATERIALS 001-171-999-5296 258.39
63203 06/29/00 002354 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS FRE I GHT 001-171-999-5296 23.26 793.95
63204 06/29/00 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230 50.00
63204 06/29/00 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5230 37.00 87.00
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN MAY VARIOUS PUBLIC NOTICES 001-120-999-5256 478.77
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN MAY VARIOUS PUBLIC NOTICES 001-120-999-5256 406.85
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN APR RECRUIT ADS:VAR. POSITIONS 001-150-999-5254 1,441.16
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN APR RECRUIT ADS:VAR.POSITIONS 190-180-999-5254 482.36
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN APR RECRUIT ADS:VAR.POSITIONS 001-150-999-5254 700.00
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUIT ADS:REC/MGMT AN/ENG/PL 190-180-999-5254 1,912.28
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUIT ADS:REC/MGMT AN/ENG/PL 001-161-999-5254 , ,676.46
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUIT ADS:REC/MGMT AN/ENG/PL 001-1990 400.00
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN MAY RECRUIT ADS:VAR.POSITIONS 001-150-999-5254 612.69
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN APR RECRUIT ADS:VAR.POSITIONS 001-150-999-5254 364.20
63205 06/29/00 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN CREOIT:WRONG ACCT BILLED 001-120-999-5256 406.85- 8,067.92
63206 06/29/00 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS IN P-16 PARK sITe STYLE "CII 190-180-999-5416 968.00
63206 06/29/00 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS IN PICK-UP 11 BENCHES FROM PARK 190-180-999-5416 575.00
63206 06/29/00 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS IN SALES TAX 190-180-999-5416 75.02 1,618.02
63207 06/29/00 000981 R H F INC RADAR EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT 001-170-999-5215 59.00 59.00
63208 06/29/00 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB BCKFLW TEST/REPAIR:VAR SLOPES 193-180-999-5212 379.00
63208 06/29/00 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB BCKFLW TEST/REPAIR:VAR PARKS 190-180-999-5212 251. 00
63208 06/29/00 000728 RAMSEY BACKFlOW & PLUMB BCKFlW TEST/REPAIR:VAR SLOPES 193-180-999-5212 75.00 705.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHERICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHERI
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUM8ER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63209 06/29/00 000947 RANCHO BELL 8LUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:R.C.SPORTS PRK 210-190-175-5804 134.60
63209 06/29/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C DUPL BLUEPRINTS:MAINT FAC MODS 210-190-158-5804 65.29
63209 06/29/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW ADMIN 001-164-604-5268 18.27
63209 06/29/00 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C OUPL BLUEPRINTS:PALA RD BRIDGE 210-165-631-5804 4.84 223.00
63210 06/29/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER OISI JUN:01-18-02200-1:LA SERENA 190-180-999-5240 2,010.98
63210 06/29/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER OIST JUN VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 3,147.51
63210 06/29/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST JUN VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 55.22
63210 06/29/00 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER OIST JUN VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 6,903.86 12,117.57
63211 06/29/00 RANCHO ELEMENTARY SCHOO REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 102.00 102.00
63212 06129/00 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE APR-MAY MGMT ACAD:MB/RW/GA/AA 001-120-999-5261 450.00
63212 06/29/00 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE APR-MAY MGMT ACAO:M8/RW/GA/AA 001-163-999-5261 450.00
63212 06/29/00 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE APR-MAY MGMT ACAD:M8/RW/GA/AA 001-165-999-5261 450.00
63212 06/29/00 001500 REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE APR-MAY MGMT ACAD:MB/RW/GA/AA 001-164-601-5261 450.00 1,800.00
63213 06/29/00 RICKARD, MIYUKI REFUND:SPORTS-GOLF LESSONS BEG 190-183-4982 50.00 50.00
63214 06/29/00 003710 RIVERA, FRED ENTERTAINMENT FOR 4TH OF JULY 190-183-999-5370 700.00 700.00
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW APR TRAFFIC CONTROL:PALA RO 210-165-631-5801 3,877.38
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW APR BIKE PATROL 001-170-999-5326 4,971.00
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW BAR ACTION RESPONSE - 5/19/00 001-170-999-5370 1,073.05
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW HOLIDAY OUI ENFORCEMNT:5/26-27 001-170-999-5370 497.10
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW MAY 8IKE PATROL 001-170-999-5326 4,473.90
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW MAY TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5370 2,187.24
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW O.T. SPEC. ENFORCEMENT:3/25-26 001-170-999-5370 1,193.04
63215 06/29/00 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW VINEYARDS 10K RUN PATROL-3/11 001-170-999-5370 422.54 18,695.25
63216 06/29/00 000958 R08ERT CARAN PRODUCTION FINAL PMT-FIREWORKS DISPLAY 190-183-999-5370 4,000.00 4,000.00
63217 06/29/00 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. REIMB:SISTER CITY TRIP:4/05-13 001-100-999-5258 116.59 118.59
63218 06129/00 SAEIOI, FARIDEH REFUNO:LEVEL 1/3 SWIM LESSONS 190-183-4975 55.00 55.00
63219 06/29/00 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH PO FRONT ST STN LOCKSMITH SVCS 001-170-999-5229 121. 16
63219 06/29/00 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CRC LOCKSMITH SVCS 190-182-999-5250 95.00
63219 06/29/00 002743 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH CRC LOCKSMITH SVCS 190-182-999-5250 75.00 291.16
63220 06/29/00 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUIT ADS:ASST ENG/PLANNER 001-164-604-5254 1,054.47
63220 06/29/00 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUIT ADS:MGMT ANALYST 190-180-999-5254 1,362.25
63220 06/29/00 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE RECRUIT ADS:MGMT ANALYST 001-164-604-5254 545.53 2,962.25
63221 06/29/00 003734 SHERWOOD, ALAN K. TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-1990 72.00 72.00
63222 06/29/00 003804 SKY HAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 320.00 320.00
63223 06/29/00 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS OISTRI SKATE PARK EQUIPMENT 190-183-999-5305 300.56 300.56
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-11-007-0455:6TH ST 001-164-603-5240 238.97
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERlOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCR I PTl ON NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALI F ED I SON JUN:2-20-302-1373:JEFFERSON 191-180-999-5319 33.94
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EOISON JUN:2-20-302-1563:JEFFERSON 191-180-999-5319 151.54
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-14-204-1615:FRNT ST RDIO 340-199-701-5240 20.39
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALI F ED I SON JUN:2-19-525-2143:RNBW CYN 191-180-999-5319 109.39
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-937-3152:MORENO RD 190-185-999-5240 646.82
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-19-111-4834:BEDFORD CT 191-180-999-5319 80.11
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-02-351-4946:SR CTR 190-181-999-5240 1,146.97
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-348-6315:MARG RO 191-180-999-5319 122.47
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-18-049-6416:FRONT ST 001-164-603-5319 171.42
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALI F ED 1 SON JUN:2-18-799-7911:MORENO RD 191-180-999-5319 55.67
63224 06/29/00 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUN:2-19-171-8568:WED CHAPEL 190-185-999-5240 62.29 2,839.98
63225 06/29/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN:095-167-7907-2:STN #84 001-171-999-5240 107.18
63225 06/29/00 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY MAIN LINE INSTALL COSTS:STN#84 001-1990 1,480.77 1,587.95
63226 06/29/00 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR TCC PEST CONTROL SVCS 190-184-999-5250 36.00
63226 06/29/00 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR STN #84 PEST CONTROL SVCS 001-171-999-5250 46.00
63226 06/29/00 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SVCS 340-199-702-5250 40.00
63226 06/29/00 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SR CTR PEST CONTROL SVCS 190-181-999'5250 29.00 153.00
63227 06/29/00 SOUTHWESTERN RIVERSIDE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00
63228 06/29/00 004157 SUNDIAL INSTALL TRUCK SEATS:FIRE 001-171-999-5214 735.00
63228 06/29/00 004157 SUNDIAL SALES TAX 001-171-999-5214 56.96 791. 96
63229 06/29/00 000574 SUPER TONER HP PRINTER SUPPLIES 320-1990 58.19 58.19
63230 06/29/00 002224 SYNDISTAR INC PUBLIC EDUCATION MATERIALS 001-171-999-5296 260_61
63230 06/29/00 002224 SYNDISTAR INC FREIGHT 001-171-999-5296 40.60 301.21
63231 06/29/00 003599 T Y L1N INTERNATIONAL MAY CONST SUPPORT:PALA RD BRG 210-165-631-5801 3,465.00 3,465.00
63232 06/29/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC REC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 40.90
63232 06/29/00 000305 TARGET STORE MISC REC SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5301 92.72 133.62
63233 06/29/00 TAR LOS & ASSOCIATES REFUND:ENG DEPOSIT:LD99-237GR 001-2670 995.00 995.00
63234 06/29/00 003665 TELEGLOBE BUSINESS SOLU MAY LONG DISTANCE PHONE SVCS 320-1990 1,743_69 1,743.69
63235 06/29/00 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PO 001-170-999-5214 43.86
63235 06/29/00 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PO 001-170-999-5214 318.19
63235 06/29/00 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PO 001-170-999-5214 116.40
63235 06/29/00 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PO 001-170-999-5214 235.39
63235 06/29/00 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PO 001-170-999-5214 419.41
63235 06/29/00 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT:TEM PO 001-170-999-5214 130.45 1,263.70
63236 06/29/00 TEMECULA SISTER CITY AS REIMB-TASTE OF THE WORLD 001-101-999-5280 712.18 712.18
63237 06/29/00 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSo INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 312.00 312.00
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED REPAIR/SVC TO PW PATCH TRUCK 001-164-601-5214 141.82
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11
06/29/00 15:35 VOUCHERICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHERI
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT
63238 06/29/DD 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED REPAIRISVC TO PW PATCH TRUCK 001-164-601-5214 1,107.88
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED REPAIRISVC TO PW PATCH TRUCK 001-164-601-5214 202.00
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIF1EO MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 190-1990 958.43
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-162-999-5263 541.75
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-170-999-5262 5.11
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-163-999-5263 290.07
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-601-5263 937.30
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIEO MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-164-604-5263 61.61
63238 06/29/00 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED MAY VEHICLE FUEL USAGE 001-165-999-5263 198.55 4,444.52
63239 06/29/00 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE SAFETY LIGHT BAR PW TRUCK 310-1910 2,076.00
63239 06/29/00 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE SALES TAX 310-1910 160.89 2,236.89
63240 06/29/00 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-1990 220.80
63240 06/29/00 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-1990 294.40
63240 06/29/00 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE FITNESS G TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-1990 120.00 635.20
63241 06/29/00 004200 VERI20N WIRELESS QTRLY PAGER SERVICE 320-199-999-5238 37.14 37.14
63242 06/29/00 003990 VIKING METAL CABINET CO ADD'L FREIGHT CHRGS:INV# 21128 210-190-808-5804 124.32 124.32
63243 06/29/00 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY I SR CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212 229.40 229.40
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL PROMOTIONAL PENCILS - VISITORS 001-100-999-5265 56.33
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL PROMOTIONAL PENCILS - VISITORS 001-101-999-5280 56.33
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL PROMOTIONAL PENCILS - VISITORS 001-111-999-5270 58.33
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL PROMOTIONAL PENCILS - VISITORS 001-111-999-5270 .01
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS II SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-100-999-5265 2.38
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-101-999-5280 2.38
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-111-999-5270 2.37
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL SALES TAX 001-100-999-5265 4.52
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL SALES TAX 001-101-999-5280 4.52
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL SALES TAX 001-111-999-5270 4.52
63244 06/29/00 003348 WEATHERLY PROMOTIONS LL SALES TAX 001-111-999-5270 .01 195.70
63245 06/29/00 003756 WHITE HOUSE SANITATION JUN MAINT SVCS:8TRFLD STAGE RR 190-180-999-5250 50.00 50.00
63246 06/29/00 WILLIAMS, CHARLES REFUND:JULY 4 '00 PARADE ENTRY 190-183-4992 20.00 20.00
63247 06/29/00 004184 WOLFES 2000 CaMP ANTENNAS-1ST RESPONSE PRM 001-171'999-5604 198.00
63247 06/29/00 004184 WOLFES 2000 FREIGHT 001-171-999-5604 1.50 199.50
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY REPAIR/MAINT-DC220 COPIER 330-199-999-5217 77.57
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY INTEREST ON DC22D COPIER 330-199-999-5391 54.73
63248 D6/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY LEASE OF DC220 COPIER 330-2800 120.67
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY BASE CHARGE:DC20 COPIER 001-171-999-5217 148.70
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY LEASE OF 5365 COPIERS 330-2800 1,285.35
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY LEASE OF DC240 COPIER 330-2800 356.45
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY INTEREST PMT OF COPIERS 330-199-999-5391 538_70
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILll MAY POOLED MAINT OF COPIERS 330-199-999-5217 4,373.22
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY LEASE OF TCC COPIER 190-184-999-5239 120.54
VOUCHRE2
06/29/00 15:35
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY LEASE OF 5800 COPIER
63248 06/29/00 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI MAY INTEREST - 5800 COPIER
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-2800
330-199-999-5391
ITEM
AMOUNT
, ,673.38
708.09
PAGE 12
CHECK
AMOUNT
9,457.40
259,877.62
~TEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF F~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City ManagerlCity Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~
July 11, 2000
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2000
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director ~
William B. Pattison, Senior Accountant I4/!
RECOMMENDATION:
as of May 31, 2000.
That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio,
receipts, and disbursements are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004
respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report which provides this information. Also
attached are reports that provide information regarding the City's assets, liabilities, and fund
balances as of May 31, 2000.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and
53635 as of May 31, 2000.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments:
1. City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2000
2. Schedule of Assets, liabilities, and Fund Equity as of May 31, 2000
3. Fund Equity Detail by Fund as of May 31. 2000
City of Temec:ula
City Treasurer's Report
Ai; of May 31, 2000
Cash AdMty for the Month of May
Cash and Investments as of May I, 2000 $ 51,341,038
Cash Receipts 9,790,941
Cash Disbursements (4.534.911)
Cash and Investments as of May 31, 2000 $ 56.597.068
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Maturity/ Contractual!
Termination Marl<et ParlBook
Type of Investment Institution Yield Date Value Balance
Petty Cash City Hall niB $ 1,500 $ 1.500
General Checking Union Bank niB 391,509 391,509 (1)
Sweep Account Union Bank 4.860 % 553.000 553,000
(Money Market Account) (H;shmark U.S. T.....ury)
Benefit Demand Deposits Union Bank niB 8,075 8,075 (I)
Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 6.190% 49,915,326 49,915,326 (2)
Certificate of Deposit Community Bank: 3.050 % 45,861 45,861
(Retention Escrow)
Various D.S.Bank. Various 224,672 224.672
(Retention Escrow)
Checking Account Union Bank niB 4,929 4.929
(parking Citationll)
TnlSt Accounts- Measure A U.S. Bank: (First Am. Treasury) 5.290 % 157 157
(Money Market Account)
TnlSt Account&- CFD 88-12 U.S. Bank (F;"t Am. T""""",) 5.290 % 132,280 132,280
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 88-12 COC Funding Corp 5.430 % 9/112017 1,531.469 1,531.469
(Investment Agreement)
Delinq. Main. Reserve Accmmt - CFD 88-12 COC Funding Corp .5.422 % 9/112017 500,000 500,000
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounts-- CFD 98-1 U.S. Bank: (First Am. Treasury) .5.290 % 888 888
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- CFD 98-1 State Treasurer 6.190 % 929,000 929.000
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Trust Accounts- TCSD COPs U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 5.290 % 341 341
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account- TCSD COPs Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 % 101112012 .502,690 .502,690
(Investment Agreement)
Trust Accounta-.RDA Bonds U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) 5.290 % 406,451 406,451
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Bayerische Landcsbank 7.400 % 2/1/2013 1,448,920 1,448,920
(Investment Agreement)
$ 56.597.068
(I)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
(2)-At May 31,2000 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $42,428,577,581.
The City's proportionate share of that value is $49,803,807.
All investments are liquid and cWTelltly available.
The City ofTemecula'. portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet
budgeted and actual expenditures of the City ofTemecula for the next six months.
City ofTemecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, llDd Fund BalllDce5
As of May 31, 2000
Community Community
Services Redevelopment Facilities
City(l) District ~ency Districts (2) Total
^""",
Cash and investments S 36,856,652 S 3,663,220 S 11,186,367 S 4,890,829 S 56,597,068
Receivables 4,783,948 1,414 2,252,181 54 7,037.597
Due from other fimds 24,822 34,166 58,988
Land held for resale 530,401 2,103,053 2,633.454
Prepaid assets 132,202 132,202
Dcposiu 420.986 420.986
Fixed assets-net 1,148,703 1.148,703
Total assets S 43.897.714 S 3.698.800 S 15.541.601 S 4,890,883 S 68.028.998
Liabilities and fimd equity:
Liabilities;
Due to other fimw S 42,592 S 16,396 S 58.988
Other liabilities 6,593,495 88.026 S 249,649 S 4,835,760 11.766.930
Deferred revenue 399,234 967.564 1.366.798
Total liabilities 7,035,321 104,422 1,217,213 4,835,760 13,192,716
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 1,281,781 1,281,781
Retained earnings 1,047,305 1,047,305
Fwd balances:
Reserved (3) 7,169,979 838,266 14,291,704 1,500 22,301,449
nc.ignated (3) 23,919,845 2,756,112 32,684 53.623 26.762.264
Undcaignated 3,443.483 3,443,483
Total fimd equity 36,862,393 3,594,378 14,324,388 55,123 54,836,282
Total liabilities and fund equity S 43,897,714 S 3,698.800 S 15,541,601 S 4.890.883 S 68,028.998
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fwd, Gas Tax Fund, and other special revenue fimds.
(2) Includes CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) and eFD 98-1 (Winchester Hills).
(3) ReservatiotU and dcsignatiotU offimd balance are detailed on the following pages.
]~ fO. ~ N 0 i5 ~ l'I ~ ~ ; ~ ::: ~ lli
~ ~ N l'I r: ~
M N. N ~ i ~ M M
"' '9 8 N '"' 8i 'tf '4 .. ; gj :Ii :t :;i ~
N ~ ~
! N ;:; ~ ~
"' .. '" '"
M
~ ~
~ :;: ~ M
M :I.
~ N
~. ; ~
M M
~ ~
~ ~ ~~
J~
"I ~
...B N
..\
~ ~
l~ ~ ~
M M
lii lii
] ~ '"' '"'
~ ~
8 u
.. ~ ~
~ ~ '"' '"'
r "I "I
~ ~
~J :0: r;; N :;: i5 ~ ~ ~~
~ ~.
0 ~ M N. N
.5 ~ ~ 8i 'tf '4 r: t
" N ;:; M N
0 .. N ~
u"
~ ~
u !:: !::
h .. ..
:> :>
...B
..\
~ ~
~ u Sj ~
on
~~ ~ M
~
~ ~ a
~ U ~ ~ .2
~
~ f-;' ~ t t a
~ ~.~ M M i
..,'"
~ ~ .
l',
~ 8 8 ~
'C
M M '"
'" '" 1
;; ;;
~ ~ ."
j t::: ~ 8 0 ~ ; ~
1! ~ N ~
~ M ~
~ t '" ~ :i t
~ .ll
M ... I
~ ~
~ ~. :I ::: G' g~
l~ r: 0 ~ :;: .~
'" N ~. or; to ~
~ ;;; N
N "
"'''' .c
'"
~ ~ i
l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .if
M ~ ~
~ it ~
~ ... ~. .~ .~
'S N
.u N. ~]
U
~ ~ if
] "i ;;;:
.t' .. .~ ~
. '3 ~ .s ~oE
~ ]~
]0:: is ~ D
fi.~~ ] ] ] 1! } " ;a I .~ H
... " . s u ~ . ..
....$::E .. ~ ~ " :g ~ t J ] 1 ~ 0
~"''o "' ~ ... gj :; ~ :E ...
. u ~ '" ~ ~ .. i!
(j~.l! (j c3 oi ei ::. u u (j
" Cl u > ~
]~ ., ~ 1; ~ ;J, N ;;; ~
". ~ N N
0 ~ ~ 0 N
~. :t :i ~ .; '" '" t
... ' ~ 0
N. ~ ~
0'" '"
....
~ ~
~
-lI
:5
~
! :i: :i:
~
~
~ ~
~ l~ 12 ~ N ~ ~ &: "
~. ~ N
.jje ~ ;{ ~ " i '"
1': ~ iO
6 :!- "
t)
."
~ ~
8 :< :<
.~ ~ ~
" "
~ 0 0
'" ~ ~
1l C\
i ~ ~
.
'" U N ~ ~ 0 :e
1 o. ~ ~ ~
0 ~ ~
;;; ~ ;i; '"
N
N N
.li
~ ~
~
J!
$' u
. ~ ~ " .~
] ~:. ." " t) '"
] ] " " " ~
eoN ~ ~ ~ '" ...
U3:f .., .., .., .., C\ 0
.... ~ ....
~'" " " u ! ! ! ! " "
~"''8 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~
()J!<! f' f' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f' f'
~.~ ::i ~ N 00
;;; 00
~ ~ M
.,.; g " ;i
3", :J: 00 8 M
~ ~ '" .,.; i
~ ~
~
~
i . 00 & ;t
.~ :;: ~
.,; :'f N
00 N M
~ ~ ~
~ c '"
~ ~
.~.~
g .~
.~
U
." ~
.~ iil 0
N
~ ~
00 :( !~
~
~ ~
~.~ M M
N .,
~
. ~ ~ ~
.3'" .. ..
~ ~
~ e] I': ~ 00
~
~ ~1 N
" N '"
~ ;;; :-
.:i if "v N
3~
~ ~
S M M
"' ~ ~
~ . 0 0
H '" g{
"'
~'" N N
~
..l
~ ~
j N 00 0
~ M :g
M
'" ~ '"
M 0
.,.; .,.;
~ ~
~
~
$'
. 'B 8 ~
gQ~ i
8 ~f;; 00
'" "9 >. eo, .2< 3
t$~ Q 0
..l U ....
;-0'0 ~ ." ." ." ."
u~.:! iil iil iil iil
]
'"
E
~~
U:;
5 .~~
t $~
~"tl'8
G~~
~
~
]
!~ :\ ~ !'!
:g
.; .;
- , ~ ~
~"'
f-o
~ ~
]~n
1!
:0
u
.~
u
~
"
IS
l~;. :\:g
.s' ~
c
o
U
..
~
;:I
~
:;f
~
~
~
I
1
Ji
8
'"
8
~
~ ~
~
u
Un
c ~ u
e, ~ ~ ~ J
=oo~ ~ ~.~
_ 00 00 00 00
00 00 0. 0\
~~~~~
!
~
- ~ ~8"":=::;!; M U :nl M M
~O M ~ ~
~ ~M V1<"l~\O'f" ! _0 ". M
...:r-: MO....;""':"" v't--' MM ~. ,;
5~ QI_MV1<"l 8., iilM M
<">..,,......,0\\0 ~
;:::' "":"":N' ~ ,., M
~ ~
~. ;:: !:!
~ ~
:;[ .;
~
u
~ ~
~ ~OM M O! ~
S::S M ~
.. " ~ M
~ 0' oC""; ~ ,., .;
~ ~3S M M
M
.; -"...:.,.j .; :f
~ ~
!;: Ii: i:' ~ ~
~
Cl ~ M
~ ~ ,., .; t
u 0 ~
f-o M ~ ~ ~
,., '"
~ ~
~ - ~ ~8:il @E: niB M M
~O ;1M ; ~
~M M
"':l"-" t~t 0'",,; i~~2 ~ :i
~.~. M _
"M ~~ NVVOO ~
.; :f Nf"-- '" ,;
M
~ ~
~ ~
!i u <I; :'5l ~ ~
~
s jj~!f j-:l ~i
. ~ ~ ., .!! 0:: S !:1 US <> .~
." M s.!!> ~ 1.8 ~ 8 ~ "g 8 :5 .8 $
3 Cl ....: <3 .~ .s ~n " ~ -g ~~ ~ fp i
e iO'M ]'" ]
u "S >. 1l ~!"' ~:; <1 IE So.. ~
t $~ ,~
.0 u f-o .D S f-o I-< S .D ~ ~
~",",'8 H j&i .:,~..,..d ~~L.ll~ ~
u~.:! 8~ f-o
~lEM 5
APPROVAL ,,,,,,,L7
CITY ATTORNEY 'tiJ~
DIR. OF FINAN~
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Ci1y Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~
July 11, 2000
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
PREPARED BY:
Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director~
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Treasurer's Statement of
Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds.
DISCUSSION: The California legislature has passed legislation imposing a State-mandated
local program requiring the treasurer or chief fiscal officer to render an annual statement cf
investment policy to the legislative body of the local agency and to render a quarterly report
containing specified information regarding investments and deposits to the chief executive
officer and the legisla1ive body of the local agency. The a11ached Treasurer's Statement of
Investment Policy conforms with the requirements and guidelines established by the California
Municipal Treasurer's Association and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers.
The City of Temecula currently invests primarily in the State of California Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF). This investment is consistent with the City's investment policy that
prioritizes safety and liquidity over yield. It should be noted that LAIF is prohibited by state
code from investing in certain derivative products such as inverse floaters. LAIF investment
policy also puts constraints on the use of reverse repurchase agreements. Government Code
Section 16429.3 states that "money placed with the S1ate Treasurer for deposit in LAIF by
cities, counties, or special districts shall not be subject to impoundment or seizure by any state
official or state agency".
The attached investment policy reflects no changes from the previous policy adopted by the
City Council on July 13, 1999.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS
Proposed Investment Policy
California Government Code Sections 53600, 53601, 53635, 53646
CITY OF TEIViECULA
lNVESTIViENT POLICY
INTRODUCTION
The investment policies and practices of the City of Temecula are based upon State law and
prudent money management. The primary goals of these policies are:
1. To protect the principal monies entrusted to this office
2. To provide sufficient liquidity to meet normal operating and unexpected
expenditures
3. To assure compliance with all Federal, State, and Local laws governing the
investment of monies under the control of the City Treasurer
4. To generate a maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of
prudent risk management and consistent with the above policies
The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer (referred to as the "Fund" throughout the remainder
of this document) will be invested, administered, and reported in a timely and prudent manner.
The City Treasurer and staff will observe, review, and react to changing conditions that effect
the Fund. The authority to execute investment transactions that will effect the Fund will be
limited to:
o City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Assistant to the City
Manager or City Clerk and
o Director of Finance acting together
The Director of Finance will meet on a regular basis with the City Manager to discuss current
market conditions, future trends, and to plan investment strategy to meet the City's fiscal
objec1ives.
The policy stated below will also address risk management because it is such an integral part
of the investment policy. To concentrate only on maximizing return would be dangerous;
therefore, policy issues will be directed to:
1. Limiting the Fund's exposure to each issue and issuer of debt; and
2. Determining a minimum credit requirement that firms must have in order to hold
City money
1
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POLICY
SCOPE
In accordance with Ordinance No. 90-2 of the City Council of the City of Temecula and
as prescribed by Section 41000 through 41007 of the Government Code of the State
of California, the City Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the
City Treasury.
II OBJECTIVES
A. Safetv of Princioal
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Temecula. Each
investment transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided,
whether from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value.
The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk:
credit risk and market risk.
1. Credit Risk Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the
issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing only with issuers
whose financial strength and reputation can be verified to be the highest
as rated by nationally known rating agencies, and by diversifying the
investment portfolio so that the failure of anyone issuer would not
unduly harm the City's cash flow.
2. Market Risk Market risk, the risk of market value fluctuations due to
overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by
(al structuring the portfolio so that securities mature earlier than or
concurrent with the timing of major cash outflows, thus eliminating the
need to sell securities prior to their maturity; (b) prohibiting the use of
leverage and margin accounts; and (c) prohibiting the taking of short
positions - that is, selling securities which the City does not own. It is
explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio,
occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within
the context of the overall investment return.
B. Return on Investment
The City's investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market-average rate
of return through economic cycles. The market-average rate of return is defined
as the average return on three-month U.S. Treasury bills. Whenever possible,
and consistent with risk limitations and prudent investment principles, the
Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the market average rate of return.
2
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POUCY
III SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES
To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual seCUrIties dealers, all
securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be
held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City
under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All
securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment
procedures (i.e., the City's safekeeping agent will only release payment for a security
after the security has been properly delivered). This section is intended to comply with
Government Code 53635.
IV REPORTING
The City Treasurer shall render a monthly report to the City Manager and City Council
showing the type of investment, issuing institution, selling institution, date of maturity,
par and dollar amount of deposit, current market value for all securities, return on the
City's investment portfolio expressed as an annual percentage rate, yield to maturity,
cash flow information demonstrating that the City can meet its upcoming financial
obligations, and such data as may be required by the City Council. The report shall also
state its relationship to this statement of investment policy, as directed under the Code.
The Treasurer shall annually submit a recommended updated Investment Policy to be
reviewed and approved by the City Council. The City's investment reporting policy
meets or exceeds the requirements of Section 53646 of the California Government
Code.
V QUALIFIED DEALERS
The City shall transact investments only with banks, savings and loans, investment
security dealers and the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. The dealers
must be primary dealers regularly reporting to the New York Federal Reserve Bank.
Exceptions to this rule will be made only after thorough research and documented
confirmation of financial strength and reputation and after approval by the City Council.
Investment staff shall investigate dealers who wish to do business with the City in order
to determine if they are adequately capitalized, market securities appropriate to the
City's needs, and are recommended by managers of portfolios similar to the City's.
The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all
dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy
shall be considered as evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment
policies. and intends to show the City only appropriate investments.
VI AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
Investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent investor" rule, which states:
"Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances
then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence
exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but
for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as
the probable income to be derived."
3
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POLICY
The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq.
Within 1he context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized. as
further limited herein:
A. United States Treasurv Bills. Bonds, and Notes. or those for which the full faith
and credit of the United States are oledaed for oavment of orincioal and interest.
There is no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio that can be invested
in this category. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash
needs or five years, whichever is less.
B. Obliaations issued bv the Government National Mortaaae Association (GNMA),
the Federal Farm Credit Bank Svstem (FFCBl. the Federal Home Loan Bank Board
(FHLBl. and the Federal National Mortaaae Association (FNMAl. Although there
is no percentage limitation on the dollar amount that can be invested in these
issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single agency name.
Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five
years, whichever is less.
C. Bills of exchanae or time drafts drawn on and acceoted bv a commercial bank.
otherwise known as banker's acceotances. Banker's acceptances purchased
may not exceed 270 days to maturity or 40% of the market value of the
portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be
invested in banker's acceptances issued by anyone bank.
D. Commercial oaoer ranked "Pl" bv Moodv's Investor Services and "A 1 +" bv
Standard and Poor's, and issued bv a domestic corooration havina assets in
excess of $500.000,000 and havina an "A" or better ratina on its lona-term
debentures as orovided bv Moodv's or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of
eligible commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market value of the
portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be
invested in commercial paper issued by anyone corporation. The City may
invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation. The City may invest in no
more than 10% of a single corporation's commercial paper. Maturity is not to
exceed 180 days.
E. Neaotiable certificates of deoosit issued bv nationallv or state-chartered banks
or state or federal savinas and loan associations. Negotiable certificates of
deposit (NCDs) differ from other certificates of deposit by their deposit liquidity.
They are issued against funds deposited for specified periods of time and earn
specified or variable rates of interest. NCDs are traded actively in secondary
markets. When feasible. an independent trading service will be used as part of
the evaluation process. Issuers must be rated "B" or better by Thomson Bank
Watch or equivalent rating service, or rated A-l for deposits by Standard &
Poors, or P-l for deposits by Moodys or comparably rated by a national rating
agency. Transactions in NCDs shall not collectively exceed 30% of the total
portfolio in effect immediately after any such investment is made.
4
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POUCY
F. Reourchase Aareements. The City may invest in repurchase agreements with
banks and dealers with which the City has entered into a master repurchase
agreement which specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements.
Transactions shall be limited to the primary dealers and the top banking
institutions according to the rating agency based on liquidity, profitability, and
financial strength. The maturity of repurchase agreements shall not exceed 30
days. The market value of securities used as collateral for repurchase
agreements shall be monitored daily by the investment staff and will not be
allowed to fall below 102% of the value of the repurchase agreement plus the
value of collateral in excess of the value of the repurchase agreement. In order
to conform with provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provide for the
liquidation of securities held as collateral for repurchase agreements, the only
securities acceptable as collateral shall be certificates of deposit, eligible bankers'
acceptances, or securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully
guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency of
the United States. No more than 50% of the portfolio may be invested in
repurchase agreements, and a "perfected security interest" shall always be
maintained in the securities subject to a repurchase agreement.
G. Local Aaencv Investment Fund. The City may invest in the Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local
agencies up to the maximum permitted by State law.
H. Time Deoosits. The City may invest in non-negotiable time deposits collateralized
in accordance with the California Governmen1 Code, in those banks and savings
and loan associations that meet the requirements for investment in negotiable
certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not liquid, no more than 15% of
the portfolio may be invested in this category. The issuer firm should have been
in existence for at least five years. The City may waive the first $100,000 of
collateral security for such deposits if the institution is insured pursuant to
federal law. In order to secure the uninsured portions of such deposits, an
institution shall maintain at least 10% in excess of the total amount deposited.
Real estate mortgages may not be accepted as collateral. The maximum term
for deposits shall be one year. In general. the issuer must have a minimum 6%
net worth to assets ratio or the minimum ratio established by the Comptroller of
the Currency. The issuer's operation must have been profitable during their last
reporting period.
I. Monev Market Funds. The City may invest in money market funds that invest
solely in U.S. Treasuries, obligations of the U.S. Treasury, and repurchase
agreements relating to such treasury obligations. To be eligible, companies
selling money market funds must have an investment advisor with not less than
five years experience and that is registered with the SEC, has the highest ranking
available as evaluated by a nationally recognized rating service, and with assets
in excess of $500 million.
This list of authorized investments is intended to apply to the investment of all operating
and surplus funds. The investment of bond proceeds shall be governed by the permitted
investments as specified in the official statement for each bond issue.
5
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POVCY
VII INELIGIBLE INVESTMENTS
Investments not described herein, including, but not limited to, reverse repurchase
agreements, mutual funds, zero. coupon bonds, inverse floaters, mortgage backed
securities, common stocks and corporate notes and bonds are prohibited from use in the
City's investment portfolio.
VIII SWAPPING OF SECURITIES
A swap is the movement from one security to another and may be done for a variety
of reasons, such as to increase yield, lengthen or shorten maturities, to take a profit. or
to increase investment quality. The purchase transaction and the sale transaction must
each be recorded separately and any losses or gains on the sale must be recorded.
IX PORTFOLIO ADJUSTMENTS
Should an investment percentage-of-portfolio limitation be exceeded due to an incident
such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to
avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the
portfolio basing his or her decision, in part, on the expected length of time the portfolio
will be unbalanced.
X POLICY REVIEW
This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with
the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance
to current law and financial and economic trends. The City Council shall be responsible
for maintaining guidance over this investment policy to ensure that the City can adapt
readily to changing market conditions, and shall approve any modification to the
investment policy prior to implementation.
STATE LAW
The legislated authority of the Fund is covered in Sections 53600, 53601, 53635 and 53646
of the Government Code. Attached are copies of the statutes that determine the maximum
parameters of the Fund. It is the policy of the City Treasurer to comply with the State laws
governing the Fund.
6
CA Codes (gov:53600-53609)
Pagel
GO'VIEIRNMIEN1r COlOlIE
SIEC1rJION 53600-53609
53600. As used in this article, "local agency" means county, city,
city and county, including a chartered city or county, school
district, community college district, public district, county board
of education, county superintendent of schools, or any public or
municipal corporation.
53600.3. Except as provided in subdivision (a) of Section 27000.3,
all governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make
investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing
public funds pursuant to this chapter are trustees and therefore
fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When
investing, reinvestiQg, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling,
or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill,
prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing,
including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and
the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in
a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the
conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard
the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency.
Within the limitations of this section and considering individual
investments as part of an overall strategy, investments may be
acquired as authorized by law.
53600.5. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring,
exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, the primary objective
of a trustee shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds under
its control. The secondary objective shall be to meet the liquidity
needs of the depositor. The third objective shall be to achieve a
return on the funds under its control.
53600.6. The Legislature hereby finds that the solvency and
creditworthiness of each individual local agency can impact the
solvency and creditworthiness of the state and other local agencies
within the state. Therefore, to protect the solvency and
creditworthiness of the state and all of its political subdivisions,
the Legislature hereby declares that the deposit and investment of
public funds by local officials and local agencies is an issue of
statewide concern.
53601. The legislative body of a local agency having money in a
sinking fund of, or surplus money in, its treasury not required for
the immediate needs of the local agency may invest any portion of the
money that it deems wise or expedient in those investments set forth
below. A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities
prescribed in this section, in a negotiable, bearer, registered, or
nonregistered format, shall require delivery of the securities to the
local agency, including those purchased for the agency by financial
advisers, consultants, or managers using the agency1s funds, by book
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&fiIe=53 600-5360 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53600-53609)
Page 2
entry, physical delivery, or by third-party custodial agreement.
The transfer of securities to the counterparty bank's customer book
entry account may be used for book entry delivery. For purposes of
this section "counterparty" means the other party to the transaction.
A counterparty bank's trust department or separate safekeeping
department may be used for the physical delivery of the security if
the security is held in the name of the local agency. Where this
section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular category
of investment, that percentage is applicable only at the date of
purchase. Where this section does not specify a limitation on the
term or remaining maturity at the time of the investment, no
investment shall be made in any security, other than a security
underlying a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement or securities
lending agreement authorized by this section, that at the time of
the investment has a term remaining to maturity in excess of five
years, unless the legislative body has granted express authority to
make that investment either specifically or as a part of an
investment program approved by the legislative body no less than
three months prior to the investment:
(a) Bonds issued by the local agency, including bonds payable
solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned,
controlled, or operated by the local agency or by a department,
board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
(b) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills, or certificates of
indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United
States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest.
(c) Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this
state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a
revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the
state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state.
(d) Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of
any local agency within this state, including bonds payable solely
out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned,
controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department,
board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
(e) Obligations issued by banks for cooperatives, federal land
banks, federal intermediate credit banks, federal home loan banks,
the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, or
in obligations, participations, or other instruments of, or issued
by, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the Federal
National Mortgage Association; or in guaranteed portions of Small
Business Administration notes; or in obligations, participations, or
other instruments of, or issued by, a federal agency or a United
States government-sponsored enterprise.
(f) Bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a
commercial bank, otherwise known as bankers acceptances. Purchases
of bankers acceptances may not exceed 270 days maturity or 40 percent
of the agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this
section. However, no more than 30 percent of the agency1s surplus
funds may be invested in the bankers acceptances of anyone
commercial bank pursuant to this section.
This subdivision does not preclude a municipal utility district
from investing any surplus money in its treasury in any manner
authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act {Division 6
(commencing with Section l150l) of the Public Utilities Code}.
(g) Commercial paper of "prime" quality of the highest ranking or
of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by Moody.s
Investors Service, Inc., or Standard and Poorls Corporation.
Eligible paper is further limited to issuing corporations that are
organized and operating within the United States and having total
assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) and
having an "A" or higher rating for the issuerls debt, other than
commercial paper, if any, as provided for by Moody's Investors
http://www.1eginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53 600-5360 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53600-53609)
Page 3 .
Service, Inc., or Standard and Poor's Corporation. Purchases of
eligible commercial paper may not exceed 180 days maturity nor
represent more than 10 percent of the outstanding paper of an issuing
corporation. Purchases of commercial paper may not exceed 15
percent of the agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant
to this section. An additional 15 percent, or a total of 30 percent
of the agency's surplus money, may be invested pursuant to this
subdivision. The additional 15 percent may be so invested only if
the dollar-weighted average maturity of the entire amount does not
exceed 31 days. "Dollar-weighted average maturity" means the sum of
the amount of each outstanding commercial paper investment multiplied
by the number of days to maturity, divided by the total amount of
outstanding commercial paper.
(h) Negotiable certificates of deposits issued by a nationally or
state-chartered bank or a state or federal association (as defined by
Section 5102 of the Financial Codel or by a state-licensed branch of
a foreign bank. Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit may
not exceed 30 percent of the agency's surplus money which may be
invested pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section,
negotiable certificates of deposits do not corne within Article 2
(commencing with Section 53630), except that the amount so invested
shall be subject to the limitations of Section 53638.
(i) (1) Investments in repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase
agreements or securities lending agreements of any securities
authorized by this section, as long as the agreements are subject to
this subdivision, including, the delivery requirements specified in
this section.
(2) Investments in repurchase agreements may be made, on any
investment authorized in this section, when the term of the agreement
does not exceed one year. The market value of securities that
underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102 percent or
greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value
shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Since the market value of
the underlying securities is subject to daily market fluctuations,
the investments in repurchase agreements shall be in compliance if
the value of the underlying securities is brought back up to 102
percent no later than the next business day.
(3) Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements
may be utilized only when either of the following conditions are
met:
(A) The security was owned
by the local agency, prior to
reverse repurchase agreement
December 31, 1994.
(B) The security to be sold on reverse repurchase agreement or
securities lending agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the
local agency for a minimum of 30 days prior to sale; the total of
all reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements
on investments owned by the local agency not purchased or committed
to purchase, prior to December 31, 1994, does not exceed 20 percent
of the base value of the portfolio; and the agreement does not exceed
a term of 92 days, unless the agreement includes a written codicil
guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period
between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement
or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the
same security.
(4) After December 31, 1994, a reverse repurchase agreement or
securities lending agreement may not be entered into with securities
not sold on a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending
agreement and purchased, or committed to purchase, prior to that
date, as a means of financing or paying for the security sold on a
reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, but may
only be entered into with securities owned and previously paid for a
or specifically committed to purchase,
December 31, 1994, and was sold using a
or securities lending agreement on
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=53 00 1-54000&file=53 600-5360 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53600-53609)
Page 4
minimum of 30 days prior to the settlement of the reverse repurchase
agreement or securities lending agreement, in order to supplement
the yield on securities owned and previously paid for or to provide
funds for the immediate payment of a local agency obligation. Funds
obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that
obtained from selling a security to a counterparty by way of a
reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, on
securities originally purchased subsequent to December 31, 1994,
shall not be used to purchase another security with a maturity longer
than 92 days from the initial settlement date of the reverse
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, unless the
reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement includes
a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the
entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final
maturity date of the same security. Reverse repurchase agreements or
securities lending agreements specified in subparagraph (B) of
paragraph (3) may not be entered into unless the percentage
restrictions specified in that subparagraph are met, including the
total of any reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending
agreements specified in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3).
(5) Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, securities
lending agreements, or similar investments in which the local agency
sells securities prior to purchase with a simultaneous agreement to
repurchase the security, may only be made upon prior approval of the
governing body of the local agency and shall only be made with
primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
(6) (A) "Repurchase agreement" means a purchase of securities by
the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the counterparty
seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date
and for a specified amount and the counterparty will deliver the
underlying securities to the local agency by book entry, physical
delivery, or by third-party custodial agreement. The transfer of
underlying securities to the counterparty bank's customer book-entry
account may be used for book-entry delivery.
(B) "Securities, II for purpose of repurchase under this
subdivision, means securities of the same issuer, description, issue
date, and maturity.
(C) "Reverse repurchase agreement II means a sale of securities by
the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the local agency
will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and
includes other comparable agreements.
(D) "Securities lending agreement II means an agreement under which
a local agency agrees to transfer securities to a borrower who, in
turn, agrees to provide collateral to the local agency. During the
term of the agreement, both the securities and the collateral are
held by a third party. At the conclusion of the agreement, the
securities are transferred back to the local agency in return for the
collateral.
(E) For purposes of this section, the base value of the local
agency's pool portfolio shall be that dollar amount obtained by
totaling all cash balances placed in the pool by all pool
participants, excluding any amounts obtained through selling
securities by way of reverse repurchase agreements, securities
lending agreements, or other similar borrowing methods.
(F) For purposes of this section, the spread is the difference
between the cost of funds obtained using the reverse repurchase
agreement and the earnings'obtained on the reinvestment of the funds.
(j) Medium-term notes, defined as all corporate and depository
institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five
years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating
within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53600-5360 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53600-53609)
Page 5
the United States or any state and operating within the United
States. Notes eligible for investment under this subdivision shall
be rated "A" or better by a nationally recognized rating service.
Purchases of medium-term notes shall not include other instruments
authorized by this section and may not exceed 30 percent of the
agency's surplus money which may be invested pursuant to this
section.
(k) (1) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified
management companies that invest in the securities and obligations as
authorized by subdivisions (a) to (j), inclusive, or subdivisions
(rn) or (n) and that comply with the investment restrictions of this
article and Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630). However,
notwithstanding these restrictions, a counterparty to a reverse
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement is not required
to be a primary dealer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York if the
company's board of directors finds that the counterparty presents a
minimal risk of default, and the value of the securities underlying a
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement may be 100
percent of the sales price if the securities are marked to market
daily.
(2) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management
companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. Sec. 80a-1 and following).
(3) If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (1),
the company shall have met either of the following criteria:
(AI Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and
numerical rating provided by not less than two nationally recognized
statistical rating organizations.
(B) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from
registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not
less than five years' experience investing in the securities and
obligations authorized by subdivisions (a) to (j), inclusive, or
subdivisions {m} or (n) and with assets under management in excess of
five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000).
(4) If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (2),
the company shall have met either of the following criteria:
(AI Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and
numerical rating provided by not less than two nationally recognized
statistical rating organizations.
(B) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from
registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not
less than five years' experience managing money market mutual funds
with assets under management in excess of five hundred million
dollars ($500,000,000).
(5) The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest purchased
pursuant to this subdivision shall not include any commission that
the companies may charge and shall not exceed 20 percent of the
agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section.
However, no more than 10 percent of the agency's surplus funds may
be invested in shares of beneficial interest of anyone mutual fund
pursuant to paragraph (1).
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this
section, Section 53635, or any other provision of law, moneys held by
a trustee or fiscal agent and pledged to the payment or security of
bonds or other indebtedness, or obligations under a lease,
installment sale, or other agreement of a local agency, or
certificates of participation in those bonds, indebtedness, or lease
installment sale, or other agreements, may be invested in accordance
with the statutory provisions governing the issuance of those bonds,
indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreement, or to
the extent not inconsistent therewith or if there are no specific
statutory provisions, in accordance with the ordinance, resolution,
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53600-53 60 07/05/2.100
CA Codes (gov:53600-53609)
Page 6
indenture, or agreement of the local agency providing for the
issuance.
(m) Notes, bonds, or other obligations that are at all times
secured by a valid first priority security interest in securities of
the types listed by Section 53651 as eligible securities for the
purpose of securing local agency deposits having a market value at
least equal to that required by Section 53652 for the purpose of
securing local agency deposits. The securities serving as collateral
shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody of a
trust company or the trust department of a bank which is not
affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, and the
security interest shall be perfected in accordance with the
requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code or federal regulations
applicable to the types of securities in which the security interest
is granted.
in) Any mortgage passthrough security, collateralized mortgage
obligation, mortgage-backed or other pay-through bond, equipment
lease-backed certificate, consumer receivable passthrough
certificate, or consumer receivable-backed bond of a maximum of five
years maturity. Securities eligible for investment under this
subdivision shall be issued by an issuer having an "An or higher
rating for the issuer's debt as provided by a nationally recognized
rating service and rated in a rating category of "AAIl or its
equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service.
Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed
20 percent of the agency's surplus money that may be invested
pursuant to this section.
53601.1. The authority of a local agency to invest funds pursuant
to Section 53601 includes, in addition thereto, authority to invest
in financial futures or financial option contracts in any of the
investment categories enumerated in that section.
53601.2. Notwithstanding subdivision (g) of Section 53601, the
board of supervisors of a county may invest in commercial paper of
"prime" quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and
numerical rating as provided for by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.,
or Standard and Poor's Corporation. Eligible paper is further
limited to issuing corporations that are organized and operating
within the United States and have total assets in excess of five
hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) and an "A" or higher rating
for the issuer's debt, other than commercial paper, if any, as
provided for by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or Standard and Poor'
s Corporation. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed
180 days' maturity nor represent more than 10 percent of the
outstanding paper of an issuing corporation. Purchases of commercial
paper may not exceed 40 percent of the agency's surplus money that
may be invested pursuant to this section. No more than 10 percent of
the agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this
section may be invested in the outstanding paper of any single
issuing corporation.
53601.5. The purchase by a local agency of any investment
authorized pursuant to Section 53601 or 53601.1, not purchased
directly from the issuer, shall be purchased either from an
institution licensed by the state as a broker-dealer, as defined in
Section 25004 of the Corporations Code, or from a member of a
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53600-5360 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53600-53609)
federally regulated securities exchange, from a national or
state-chartered bank, from a federal or state association (as defined
by Section 5102 of the Financial Code) or from a brokerage firm
designated as a primary government dealer by the Federal Reserve
bank.
53601.6. (a) A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to
this article in inverse floaters, range notes, or mortgage derived
interest-only strips.
(b) A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to this
article in any security that could result in zero interest accrual if
held to maturity. However, a local agency may hold prohibited
instruments until their maturity dates. The limitation in this
subdivision shall not apply to local agency investments in shares of
beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. Sec.
80a-l, and following) that are authorized for investment pursuant to
subdivision (k) of Section 53601.
Page 7
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
Page 8
53635. As far as possible, all money belonging to, or in the
custody of, a local agency, including money paid to the treasurer or
other official to pay the principal, interest, or penalties of bonds,
shall be deposited for safekeeping in state or national banks,
savings associations or federal associations, credit unions, or
federally insured industrial loan companies in this state selected by
the treasurer or other official having the legal custody of the
money; or, unless otherwise directed by the legislative body pursuant
to Section 53601, may be invested in the investments set forth
below. A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities
described in this section, in a negotiable, bearer, registered, or
nonregistered format, shall require delivery of all the securities to
the local agency, including those purchased for the agency by
financial advisers, consultants, or managers using the agency's
funds, by book-entry, physical delivery, or by third-party custodial
agreement. The transfer of securities to the counterparty bank's
customer book entry account may be used for book-entry delivery. For
purposes of this section, "counterpartyll means the other party to
the transaction. A counterparty bank's trust department or separate
safekeeping department may be used for the physical delivery of the
security if the security is held in the name of the local agency.
Where this section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular
category of investment, that percentage is applicable only at the
date of purchase.
(a) Bonds issued by the local agency, including bonds payable
solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned,
controlled, or operated by the local agency or by a department,
board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
(b) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills, or certificates of
indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United
States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest.
(cl Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this
state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a
revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the
state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state.
(d) Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of
any local agency within this state, including bonds payable solely
out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned,
controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department,
board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
(e) Obligations issued by banks for cooperatives, federal land
banks, federal intermediate credit banks, federal home loan banks,
the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Tennessee Valley Authority, or in
obligations, participations, or other instruments of, or issued by,
or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the Federal
National Mortgage Association; or in guaranteed portions of Small
Business Administration notes; or in obligations, participations, or
other instruments of, or issued by, a federal agency or a United
States government-sponsored enterprise.
If) Bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a
commercial bank, otherwise known as bankers acceptances. Purchases
of bankers acceptances may not exceed 270 days maturity or 40 percent
of the agency's surplus funds which may be invested pursuant to this
section. However, no more than 30 percent of the agency's surplus
funds may be invested in the bankers acceptances of anyone
commercial bank pursuant to this section.
This subdivision does not preclude a municipal utility district
from investing any surplus money in its treasury in any manner
authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act, Division 6
(commencing with Section 11501) of the Public Utilities Code.
(g) Commercial paper of "prime" quality of the highest ranking or
of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by Moody's
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53630-5368 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
Page 9
Investors Service, Inc., or Standard and Poorls Corporation.
Eligible paper is further limited to issuing corporations that are
organized and operating within the United States and having total
assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) and
having an "An or higher rating for the issuer1s debt, other than
commercial paper, if any, as provided for by Moody's Investors
Service, Inc., or Standard and Poor's Corporation. Purchases of
eligible commercial paper may not eKceed 180 days maturity nor
represent more than 10 percent of the outstanding paper of an issuing
corporation. Purchases of commercial paper may not exceed 15
percent of the agency's surplus money which may be invested pursuant
to this section. An additional 15 percent, or a total of 30 percent
of the agency's money or money in its custody, may be invested
pursuant to this subdivision. The additional 15 percent may be so
invested only if the dollar-weighted average maturity of the entire
amount does not exceed 31 days. "Dollar-weighted average maturity II
means the sum of the amount of each outstanding commercial paper
investment multiplied by the number of days to maturity, divided by
the total amount of outstanding commercial paper.
(h) Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally or
state-chartered bank or a savings association or federal association
or a state or federal credit union or by a state-licensed branch of a
foreign bank. Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit may
not exceed 30 percent of the agency's surplus money which may be
invested pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section,
negotiable certificates of deposit do not come within Article 2
(commencing with Section 53630) of Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 2
of Title 5, except that the amount so invested shall be subject to
the limitations of Section 53638. For purposes of this section, the
legislative body of a local agency and the treasurer or other
official of the local agency having legal custody of the money are
prohibited from depositing or investing local agency funds, or funds
in the custody of the local agency, in negotiable certificates of
deposit issued by a state or federal credit union if a member of the
legislative body of the local agency, or an employee of the
administrative officer, manager's office, budget office,
auditor-controller's office, or treasurer's office of the local
agency also serves on the board of directors, or any committee
appointed by the board of directors, or the credit committee or
supervisory committee of the state or federal credit union issuing
the negotiable certificates of deposit.
(i) (1) Investments in repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase
agreements, or securities lending agreements of any securities
authorized by this section, so long as the agreements are subject to
this subdivision, including the delivery requirements specified in
this section.
(2) Investments in repurchase agreements or securities lending
agreements may be made, on any investment authorized in this section,
when the term of the agreement does not exceed one year. The market
value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be
valued at 102 percent or greater of the funds borrowed against those
securities and the value shall be adjusted no less than quarterly.
Since the market value of the underlying securities is subject to
daily market fluctuations, the investments in repurchase agreements
shall be in compliance if the value of the underlying securities is
brought back up to 102 percent no later than the next business day.
(3) Reverse repurchase agreements may be utilized only when either
of the following condition~ are met:
(A) The security was owned or specifically committed to purchase,
by the local agency, prior to repurchase agreement on December 31,
1994, and was sold using a reverse repurchase agreement or
securities lending agreement on December 31, 1994.
(B) The security to be sold on reverse repurchase agreement or
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53630-5368 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
Page 10
securities lending agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the
local agency for a minimum of 30 days prior to sale; the total of
all reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements
on investments owned by the local agency not purchased or committed
to purchase, prior to December 31, 1994, does not exceed 20 percent
of the base value of the portfolio; and the agreement does not exceed
a term of 92 days, unless the agreement includes a written codicil
guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period
between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement
or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the
same security.
(4) After December 31, 1994, a reverse repurchase agreement or
securities lending agreement may not be entered into with securities
not sold on a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending
agreement and purchased, or committed to purchase, prior to that
date, as a means of financing or paying for the security sold on a
reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, but may
only be entered into with securities owned and previously paid for a
minimum of 30 days prior to the settlement of the reverse repurchase
agreement or securities lending agreement, in order to supplement
the yield on securities owned and previously paid for or to provide
funds for the immediate payment of a local agency obligation. Funds
obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that
obtained from selling a security to a counterparty by way of a
reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, on
securities originally purchased subsequent to December 31, 1994,
shall not be used to purchase another security with a maturity longer
than 92 days from the initial settlement date of the reverse
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, unless the
reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement includes
a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the
entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final
maturity date of the same security. Reverse repurchase agreements or
securities lending agreements specified in subparagraph (B) of
paragraph (3) may not be entered into unless the percentage
restrictions specified in that subparagraph are met, including the
total of any reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending
agreements specified in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3).
(5) Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, securities
lending agreements, or similar investments in which the local agency
sells securities prior to purchase with a simultaneous agreement to
repurchase the security, may only be made upon prior approval of the
governing body of the local agency and shall only be made with
primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
(6) (A) "Repurchase agreement II means a purchase of securities by
the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the counterparty
seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date
and for a specified amount and the counterparty will deliver the
underlying securities to the local agency by book entry, physical
delivery, or by third-party custodial agreement. The transfer of
underlying securities to the counterparty bank's customer book-entry
account may be used for book-entry delivery.
(B) "Securities," for purpose of repurchase under this
subdivision, means securities of the same issuer, description, issue
date, and maturity.
(C) IIReverse repurchase agreement" means a sale of securities by
the local agency pursuant too an agreement by which the local agency
will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date, and
includes other comparable agreements.
(D) "Securities lending agreement" means an agreement under which
a local agency agrees to transfer securities to a borrower who, in
turn, agrees to provide collateral to the local agency. During the
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53630-53 68 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
Page 11
term of the agreement, both the securities and the collateral are
held by a third party. At the conclusion of the agreement, the
securities are transferred back to the local agency in return for the
collateral.
(E) For purposes of this section, the base value of the local
agency's pool portfolio shall be that dollar amount obtained by
totaling all cash balances placed in the pool by all pool
participants, excluding any amounts 'obtained through selling
securities by way of reverse repurchase agreements or other similar
borrowing methods.
(F) For purposes of this section, the spread is the difference
between the cost of funds obtained using the reverse repurchase
agreement or securities lending agreement and the earnings obtained
on the reinvestment of the funds.
{jl Medium-term notes, defined as all corporate and depository
institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five
years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within
the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the
United States or any state and operating within the United States.
Notes eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated
"A" or better by a nationally recognized rating service. Purchases
of medium-term notes shall not include other instruments authorized
by this section and may not exceed 30 percent of the agency's surplus
money which may be invested pursuant to this section.
(k) (1) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified
management companies that invest in the securities and obligations as
authorized by subdivisions (a) to (j), inclusive, or subdivision (l)
or (m) and that comply with the investment restrictions of this
article and Article 1 (commencing with Section 53600). However,
notwithstanding these restrictions, a counterparty to a reverse
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement is not required
to be a primary dealer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York if the
company's board of directors finds that the counterparty presents a
minimal risk of default, and the value of the securities underlying a
repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement may be 100
percent of the sales price if the securities are marked to market
daily.
(2) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management
companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. Sec. 80a-l and following).
(3) If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (I),
the company shall have met either of the following criteria:
(A) Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and
numerical rating provided by not less than two nationally recognized
statistical rating organizations.
(B) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from
registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not
less than five years' experience investing in the securities and
obligations authorized by subdivisions (a) to (j), inclusive, or
subdivision (I) or (m) and with assets under management in excess of
five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000).
(4) If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (2),
the company shall have met either of the following criteria:
(A) Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and
numerical rating provided by not less than two nationally recognized
statistical rating organizations.
(B) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from
registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not
less than five years' experience managing money market mutual funds
with assets under management in excess of five hundred million
dollars ($500,000,000).
(5) The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest purchased
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53 630-5368 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
Page 12
pursuant to this subdivision shall not include any commission that
the companies may charge and shall not exceed 20 percent of the
agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section.
However, no more than 10 percent of the agency's surplus funds may
be invested in shares of beneficial interest of anyone mutual fund
pursuant to paragraph (1).
(I) Notes, bonds, or other obligations which are at all times
secured by a valid first priority security interest in securities of
the types listed by Section 53651 as eligible securities for the
purpose of securing local agency deposits having a market value at
least equal to that required by Section 53652 for the purpose of
securing local agency deposits. The securities serving as collateral
shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody of a
trust company or the trust department of a bank which is not
affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, and the
security interest shall be perfected in accordance with the
requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code or federal regulations
applicable to the types of securities in which the security interest
is granted.
(m) Any mortgage passthrough security, collateralized mortgage
obligation, mortgage-backed or other pay-through bond, equipment
lease-backed certificate, consumer receivable passthrough
certificate, or consUmer receivable-backed bond of a maximum of five
years maturity. Securities eligible for investment under this
subdivision shall be issued by an issuer having an "A" or higher
rating for the issuer's debt as provided by a nationally recognized
rating service and rated in a rating category of "M" or its
equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service.
Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed
20 percent of the agency's surplus money that may be invested
pursuant to this section.
53635.2. Notwithstanding subdivision (g) of Section 53635, the
board of supervisors of a county may invest in commercial paper of
"prime" quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and
numerical rating as provided for by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.,
or Standard and Poor's Corporation. Eligible paper is further
limited to issuing corporations that are organized and operating
within the United States and have total assets in excess of five
hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) and an "A" or higher rating
for the issuer's debt, other than commercial paper, if any, as
provided for by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or Standard and Poor'
s Corporation. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed
180 days' maturity nor represent more than 10 percent of the
outstanding paper of an issuing corporation. Purchases of commercial
paper may not exceed 40 percent of the agency's surplus money that
may be invested pursuant to this section. No more than 10 percent of
the agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this
section may be invested in the outstanding paper of any single
issuing corporation.
53635.5. The purchase by a local agency of any investment
authorized pursuant to Section 53635, not purchased directly from the
issuer, shall be purchased either from an institution licensed by
the state as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section 25004 of the
Corporations Code, or from a member of a federally regulated
securities exchange, from a national or state-chartered bank, from a
savings association or a federal association, or from a brokerage
firm designated as a primary government dealer by the Federal Reserve
bank.
http://www.1eginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=53 00 1-54000&file=53 630-53 68 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
Page 13
53635.7. In making any decision that involves borrowing in the
amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more, the
legislative body of the local agency shall discuss, consider, and
deliberate each decision as a separate item of business on the agenda
of its meeting as prescribed in Chapter 9 (commencing with Section
54950). As used in this section, "borrowing" does not include bank
overdrafts.
53636. Money so deposited is deemed to be in the treasury of the
local agency.
53637. The money shall be deposited in any bank, savings
association or federal association, state or federal credit union, or
federally insured industrial loan company with the objective of
realizing maximum return, consistent with prudent financial
management, except that money shall not be deposited in any state or
federal credit union 'if a member of the legislative body of a local
agency, or any person with investment decisionmaking authority of the
administrative office, manager's office, budget office,
auditor-controller's office, or treasurer's office of the local
agency, also serves on the board of directors, or any committee
appointed by the board of directors, or the credit committee or
supervisory committee, of the state or federal credit union.
53638. (a) The deposit shall not exceed the shareholder's equity of
any depository bank. For the purposes of this subdivision,
shareholder's equity shall be determined in accordance with Section
118 of the Financial Code, but shall be deemed to include capital
notes and debentures.
(b) The deposit shall not exceed the total of the net worth of any
depository savings association or federal association, except that
deposits not exceeding a total of five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000) may be made to a savings association or federal
association without regard to the net worth of that depository, if
such deposits are insured or secured as required by law.
(c) The deposit to the share accounts of any regularly chartered
credit union shall not exceed the total of the unimpaired capital and
surplus of the credit union, as defined by rule of the Commissioner
of Financial Institutions, except that the deposit to any credit
union share account in an amount not exceeding five hundred thousand
dollars ($500,000) may be made if the share accounts of that credit
union are insured or guaranteed pursuant to Section 14858 of the
Financial Code or are secured as required by law.
(d) The deposit in investment certificates of a federally insured
industrial loan company shall not exceed the total of the unimpaired
capital and surplus of the insured industrial loan company.
53639. Except as otherwise provided in Section 53682, the
depository shall bear the expenses of transportation of money to and
from the depository.
53640. Except as otherwise provided in Section 53682, the
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53630-5368 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
Page 14
depository shall handle, collect, and pay all checks, drafts, and
other exchange without cost to the local agency.
53641. When money is deposited in a depository, the treasurer or
other authorized official shall take and preserve a receipt,
certificate of deposit, or other evidence of the deposit as he or she
requires.
53642. The money deposited may be drawn out by check or order of
the treasurer or other official authorized to make such deposit.
53643. The treasurer may deposit any part of the money as agreed
upon between the treasurer and the depository.
53644. If an agreem~nt is not made:
(a) Active deposits and interest thereon are subject to withdrawal
upon the demand of the treasurer or other authorized official,
subject to any penalties which may be prescribed by federal law or
regulation.
(b) Inactive deposits are subject to notice of at least thirty
days before withdrawal.
53645. Interest shall be computed and paid by the depository, as
follows:
(a) For active deposits upon which interest is payable, interest
shall be computed on the average daily balance for the calendar
quarter, and shall be paid quarterly.
(b) For inactive deposits, interest shall be computed on a 360-day
basis, and shall be paid quarterly.
x
53646. (a) (1) In the case of county government, the treasurer
shall annually render to the board of supervisors and any oversight
committee a statement of investment policy, which the board shall
review and approve at a public meeting. Any change in the policy
shall also be reviewed and approved by the board at a public meeting.
(2) In the case of any other local agency, the treasurer or chief
fiscal officer of the local agency shall annually render to the
legislative body of that local agency and any oversight committee of
that local agency a statement of investment policy, which the
legislative body of the local agency shall consider at a public
meeting. Any change in the policy shall also be considered by the
legislative body of the local agency at a public meeting.
(b) (1) The treasurer or chief fiscal officer shall render a
quarterly report to the chief executive officer, the internal
auditor, and the legislative body of the local agency. The quarterly
report shall be so submitted within 30 days following the end of the
quarter covered by the report. Except as provided in subdivisions
(e) and (f), this report shall include the type of investment,
issuer, date of maturity par and dollar amount invested on all
securities, investments and moneys held by the local agency, and
shall additionally include a description of any of the local agency's
http://www.leginfo.ca..../displaycode?section=gov&group=5300 1-54000&file=53 630-5368 07/05/2000
CA Codes (gov:53630-53686)
funds, investments, or programs, that are under the management of
contracted parties, including lending programs. With respect to all
securities held by the local agency, and under management of any
outside party that is not also a local agency or the State of
California Local Agency Investment Fund, the report shall also
include a current market value as of the date of the report, and
shall include the source of this same valuation.
(2) The quarterly report shall state compliance of the portfolio
to the statement of investment policy, or manner in which the
portfolio is not in compliance.
(3) The quarterly report shall include a statement denoting the
ability of the local agency to meet its pool's expenditure
requirements for the next six months, or provide an explanation as to
why sufficient money shall, or may, not be available.
(4) In the quarterly report, a subsidiary ledger of investments
may be used in accordance with accepted accounting practices.
(c) Pursuant to subdivision (b), the treasurer or chief fiscal
officer shall report whatever additional infoDmation or data may be
required by the legislative body of the local agency.
(d) The legislative body of a local agency may elect to require
the report specified in subdivision (b) to be made on a monthly basis
instead of quarterly._
(e) For local agency investments that have been placed in the
Local Agency Investment Fund, created by Section 16429.1, in National
Credit Union Share Insurance Fund-insured accounts in a credit
union, in accounts insured or guaranteed pursuant to Section 14858 of
the Financial Code, or in Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation-insured accounts in a bank or savings and loan
association, in a county investment pool, or any combination of
these, the treasurer or chief fiscal officer may supply to the
governing body, chief executive officer, and the auditor of the local
agency the most recent statement or statements received by the local
agency from these institutions in lieu of the information required
by paragraph (I) of subdivision (b) regarding investments in these
institutions.
(f) The treasurer or chief fiscal officer shall not be required to
render a quarterly report, as required by subdivision (b), to a
legislative body or any oversight committee of a school district or
county office of education for securities, investments, or moneys
held by the school district or county office of education in
individual accounts that are less than twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000) .
Page 15
~lEM 6
APPROVAL ~A,.~
CITY ATTORNEY l'{,{/VU
DIRECTOR OF FINANCI:: ~
CITY MANAGER ~.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Chief Building Official~
DATE:
July 11, 2000
SUBJECT:
Contract Inspection Services for Building and Safety
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with
P & D Consultants, in an amount not to exceed sixty thousand dollars ($60,000), to provide
supplemental building inspection services to the Building and Safety Department.
DISCUSSION: The City continues to experience a high level of construction activity. This
request is for continuance of contract inspection assistance provided to the City by P & D
Consultants. P & D has provided this service for approximately two (2) years to date.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are currently available in Account No. 001-162-999-5118, ''Temporary
Help", for this purpose. Expenditures from this account are offset by building permit revenue
collection. No further appropriation of funds will be necessary for this purpose.
F:\DEPTS\BLDGSAFE\BROCKMEI\AGENDA\P&D CONSULTANTSOO.DOC
7/6/00
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 11, 1999, between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and p'& D Consultants, ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 11, 2000, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June
30, 2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on
the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) for the total
term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein,
unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager.
Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as
agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to
Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work
not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be
approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as
to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
-1-
r:brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence
of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the
event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the
right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary,
and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused
or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
-2-
r:brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which
the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent
or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of
Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board
member, office or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-
contractural, financial, or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party
other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either
party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to
the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under
Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division
4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum ScoDe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the
consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
-3-
r:brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
(4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions
as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and
completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied
or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or
borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect
to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coveraae. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be
on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City
before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements
effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
-4-
r.brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City
nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or
any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement.
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees
or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur
or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any
manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without
written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily
provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or
other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project
or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
-5-
r:brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
P & D Consultants
999 Town & Country Road
4th Floor
Orange,CA 92868
15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City.
9. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering
into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's
own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Jeffery E. Stone, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
-6-
drockmei\agmts\P&DOO
CONSULTANT
P & D Consultants
By
Steven L. Patterson, Associate V.P.
-7-
r.brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Perform combination building inspection on an as-needed basis.
-8-
r:brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
For and in consideration of the Contractor's services, inspection services shall be provided at the
rate of $45.00 per hour, plus $.32 per mile for each mile accumulated while performing inspection
services for the City. Should the City provide vehicular transportation for Contractor's use, no fees
shall be charge for mileage.
-9-
r:brockmei\agmts\P&DOO
~lEM 1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
July 11,2000
SUBJECT:
Substitute Agreements and Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract No.
29510, Located North of State Route 79 South, West of Margarita Road
PREPARED BY: ~onald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and replacement securities for
Public Improvements in Tract No. 29510.
2. AUTHORIZE release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and subdivision
Monumentation securities on file.
3. DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2000, the City Council approved Tract Map No.
29510, and entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements with:
Atlantic Richfield Company
A Delaware Corporation
Arco Products Company
4 Centerpointe Drive
La Palma, CA 90623
For the improvement of streets and drainage, water and sewer systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the agreements were the following bonds as posted by United
Pacific Insurance Company:
1. Bond No. 08008744 in the total amount of $113,506 for Faithful Performance and Labor
and Material purposes.
2. Bond No. 08008743 in the total amount of $1,000 for Monumentation purposes.
R:\agdrpt\2000\071 1 ~r2951 Osubagmt
The original subdivider has sold this project to the following developer:
79 South Medical Plaza
A California Limited Liability Company
P.O. Box 890292
Temecula, CA 92589-0292
The new developer has submitted a substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and the
following bonds as posted by American Motorists Insurance Company:
1. Bond No. 3SM 98199500 in the total amount of $113,506 for Faithful Performance and
Labor and Material purposes.
2. Bond No. 3SM 981 996 00 in the total amount of $1,000 for Monumentation purposes.
Staff recommends that the new developer be granted the full contractual 18-month construction
period under said Section 20 of the contract documents.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement (On file)
3. Substitute Improvement securities (On file)
2
R:\agdrpt\2000\0711 ~r2951 Osubagmt
'i$
.~
~
~.
=
S~TE
WTI~ ~
NTS
~
~iD
~~
=~.~
~TEM B
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
IhjA;William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
July 11, 2000
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Authorize Temporary Street Closure for Construction Purposes (De Portola
Road from Campanula Way to Meadows Parkway)
PREPARED BY: Pf.. Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
~Clement Jimenez, Assistant Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURE
FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES IN DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM
CAMPANULA WAY TO MEADOWS PARKWAY AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC
CONSTRUCTION CLOSURE.
BACKGROUND: Newland Communities, LLC, is currently constructing improvements
in Campanula Way, De Portola Road, and Margarita Road. The improvement plans require the
construction of a storm drain facility, sewer main, water main, center median islands, utility
relocations, and widening of these streets. The Developer proposes to construct De Portola Road
improvements in two phases. Phase I includes Campanula Way improvements and storm drain
installation on De Portola Road between Campanula Way and Margarita Road. Phase II includes
De Portola Road improvements from Campanula Way to Meadows Parkway. The Developer
requests a street closure for De Portola Road Phase II construction. The Developer is prepared to
complete improvements on Campanula Way, before De Portola Road closure, to allow access to the
ball fields in Paloma Del Sol Park.
Due to the inherent nature of street construction where sewer and water mains together with a major
storm drain facility require ample room for construction, it would be prudent to close the street until
the street is again passable. The closing of De Portola Road would lessen the traffic impact to the
public by allowing the Developer to expedite completion of street improvements.
Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways
under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other
instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events,
and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is
necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during
the temporary closing".
r.\ad1ll]ll\2OOOlO711\OePol1013 Rd Cbsure
Staff recommends that temporary street closure for an estimated three month minimum period of
construction, from 7/15/00 to 10/15/00, be authorized. All necessary traffic control sign age,
appropriate detour signage, and coordination with Caltrans for Highway 79 (S) would be reviewed
and approved by Staff. This street closure would not be initiated until the developer has completed
all street improvement work on Campanula Way between Meadows Parkway and De Portola Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None. The developer will be responsible for appropriate construction zone and detour signing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 2000-_.
Vicinity Map/Conceptual Detour Plan
Letter of Request for street closure
2
r:\adgrpt\2OOO\0711\DePa1ola Rd Cbsure
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURE
FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES IN DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM
CAMPANULA WAY TO MEADOWS PARKWAY AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC
CONSTRUCTION CLOSURE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the closure of public street for the
construction of major facilities including related grading, for which such temporary street closures
promote the safety and protection of persons normally using or proposing to use those streets by
closing that street to through traffic, and providing a suitable detour route and plan;
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve
temporary street closure of De Portola Road from Campanula Way to Meadows Parkway for
construction purposes.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures of De Portola Road for construction
purposes from Campanula Way to Meadows Parkway subject to conditions, and affirms the general
rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City
Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 11th day of July, 2000.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
3
r.\adgrpt\20C0\0711\DePortoa Rd CbslJre
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones,CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2000-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
o
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
o
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
o
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
WAY.w.
~
?C
~
FINAL N ~
3 a..
ill
0
~ ~
~ 3 ~
G
<'l'6 ;!
~~ """"'"
'1;.~
~-r..
;4-r.
~~
~\ COI.LE ~o
~ l
Q
<t
o
'"
N.A.P.
-r
N.A.P.
<t
....
0;
<t
"
~.....
:3
,,---=-
,.
/
/
NEIGHBORHooD--'
SHOPPING CENTER
TPM 25417
~ II
" I
~I
~ ~I
,. ~;
FUTURE PLANNING AREA
RETAIL COMMERCIAL
I - "DETOUR "ROuTE.
HH" -CL05Ur..e. ;:...Rt:..A
.
[IJ
NEWLAND
COMMUNITIES
NEWLAND CALIFORNIA
27393 Ynez Road
Suite 253
Temecula, CA 92591-4608
909.694.5572
Fax 909.694.3612
project@paseodelsol.com
v.'WW.paseodelsol.com
June 13, 2000
RECEijVEO
JUN 1 32000
CITY OF TEMECULA .
ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN ;
Mr. Gerald L. Alegria
City ofTemecula
Dept. of Public Works
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: Street Closure Request - De Portola Road
Dear Jerry:
Newland Communities, LLC is currently constructing improvements in
Campanula Way, DePortola Road and Margarita Road. The improvement
plan requires the construction of a storm drain facility, sewer main, water main,
center median Islands, utility relocations and widening of these streets.
DePortola Road improvement work is to be constructed in two phases. The
first phase of improvements concentrates on the new road construction of
Campanula Way, and the work associated with storm drain construction on
the portion of DePortola from Campanula to Margarita including the relocation
work and the storm drain work on Margarita. Phase 2 would be the
improvement work on DePortola east of Campanula Way to Meadows
Parkway. It is for the phase 2 work of DePortola Road that Newland
Communities requests the closure. In an effort to minimize the traffic impact
associated with the DePortola closure, Newland Communities is prepared to
open Campanula Way from Meadows Parkway to DePortola to access the
ball fields, before closing DePortola Road.
By closing DePortola Road, it will lessen the impact to the public by expediting
the completion of our improvements to this area. Newland Communities
hereby requests that DePortola Road be closed from Meadows Parkway to
the west boundary of the Paloma Del Sol Sports Park. In the interest of public
safety and public convenience, we suggest that proposed closure be for a
minimum of three months from 7/15/00 to 10/15/00. Enclosed are a tentative
schedule and a proposed detour plan.
We will be available to discuss this with you at a suitable time. Please do not
hesitate to contact me at (909) 694-5572 if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
Ji Stewart
irector of Land Development
cc: Bill Hughes
~TEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: .~h~Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: July 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for recordation purposes for
Right Of Way Dedication for Road Purposes PA99-0205, Conditional Use
Permit for a Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility at 44526 Pal a Road
(South of Pala Road Bridge)
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer, Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Adopt a Resolution Entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
CERTAIN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR
RECORDATION PURPOSES FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD
PURPOSES FOR PA99-0205, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY AT
44526 PALA ROAD (SOUTH OF PALA ROAD BRIDGE).
2. Authorize and direct the City Clerk to record the documents approved by the Resolution
as listed above.
BACKGROUND: On March 23, 2000, the Planning Director of the City of Temecula
approved Planning Application No. PA99-0205 (Conditional Use Permit) for a Recreational
vehicle storage facility at 44526 Pal a Road. The existing northerly half width right-of-way of Pala
Road along the property frontage is 55 feet. An additional 12 feet of right-of-way is required in
compliance with the requirements of the Circulation Element of the General Plan which
classifies Pala Road as an Urban Arterial Highway with a 134 feet full width right-of-way. Hence,
the Developer was conditioned to dedicate 12 feet of right-of-way on Pala Road along the
property frontage (Condition no. 44 of the approved Conditions of Approval).
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the irrevocable offer of dedication for right-of-
way.
R:\agdrpl\2000\0711 IPA99-0255 Offer of Dedicalionlajp
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2000-_. with Exhibits "A" and "B"
2. Vicinity Map
3. Offer of Dedication Document
R:\agdrpt\2000\0711\PA99-0255 Oner of Dedicalion/ajp
2
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
CERTAIN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR
RECORDATION PURPOSES FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD
PURPOSES FOR PA99-0205, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY AT
44526 PALA ROAD (SOUTH OF PALA ROAD BRIDGE)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Temecula City Staff has established the requirements for
certain right-of-way dedication as conditions of approval for the development of the Planning
Application PA 99-0205
Section 2. The Property Owners, George W. Weir and Cynthia L. Weir, have
submitted an irrevocable offer of dedication for right-of-way for road purposes.
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula City Council hereby desires to consent to the
recordation of the irrevocable offer of dedication for right-of-way for road purposes by George
W. Weir and Cynthia L. Weir. Council acceptance shall be by Resolution of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby approves
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 11'h day of July, 2000.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerlk
R:\agdrpt\2000\0711 IPA99-0255 Offer of Dedicalionlajp
3
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECUA )
I Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2000-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11'h day of July, 2000 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
o
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
o
ABSENT:
o
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agdrpt\2000\0711 \PA99-0255 Offer of Oedicalionlajp
4
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OF ROAD DEDICATION
A portion of Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 11984 as filed in Book 67 Page 87 of Parcel
Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder, County of Riverside, State of California. (this land
being also recorded pursuant to Riverside County Lot Line Adjustment No. 1639, Approved
March 7, 1983), more particularly described as follows;
Southwesterly 12.00 feet of Parcel 2 of Lot Line Adjustment No. 1639, Approved March 7,
1983.
Containing 3.233.92 SQUARE FEET or 0.074 acres, more or less.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
..~:"":"~. -~. >.
/.
'<..
..- --.~
.../
~
w:z 0
1-'0 zC3
<- 0
~I~ j::~
(J),C: <...J
:J() ()<
::::l(J) u. is a.
_,wowu.
0.0 00
I-....J oz
I-~< <0
:s~ OJ::
IW II: II:
a.....J 0
a.
u.:
u:i
(\J
OJ
M
C')
(\J
C')
II
<
W
II:
<
O'
00.
.00
COu-iO
11)0 .
N~uJ
ONN
II II II
<l0::--!
50
~
II)
I
X
W
~
~!l,'~
o:!'z
;;
,,~
C!J
CD
:;:
~,
-1t~
",9 "-
00<:''''''' "-
-1t.91000 0"'/<"'1-
f"'",:t>/
I '<
'2' 1::0 "'1- I
~ 0. ~b. /
I~& U/, I
, o~o~
, I o~o
/ 0 /0'
(OJ ,/..;-- II'"
I')g- I
"O.CO I CD
c;Q) fal q,,~ I' .....i'-O? I 0:,
. _,..,., 4/ 1:..,,",\
1')";- I') ( -;-:: 0)
o C!J ,ON..... Of)
..... ~ I ~ II II 1 ci;:::
....., > / ~ , 0::--> 2:,
1 0"
~ . '" 0", I ..-1.5 Q -
ZOl , -l:Z:~ / z\ _lll,11)
I qUl"-"'1 ~I'}-.~~'~
~~ ~i~' ;::\ ,,,,t; ~ Lti;
<( _I~ / g <g\; 0 ~
"- llJ/:l , '0 -, \ L::-)I a; L"
) ,....... <:i) <{ ....! r.....
it' _~ ~\Q W Q:Z:(!)
< / 0"- 1 U) ll. Q;:
, "- / 2:::0 uJ 11) 0<('"
^' "_' Z 1 N ~
I /' I ~ ::i\ N:Z:"
\' ,~ .0-1<
-1/ / _I L, " ;:: lLl"--
_ _ ,/ _I It! "-01 0 '-- 0
I I' I !,,!;( .J1:2 0 ~
/ I" I '0 ~\ "-Q
I "I
/ ! '-~ _I
I J / 0
/ Q
I '
I '
,lO'q6\.' l I
, ,?0'SL6 l, CJ" l O,L l.60=<:;7
I I I
,09 / ,09 /
~
, &l
'0'0 n..~.~lv(
~k<f:
"'---- ~Q
'<
~
ci
:z:
"-
<(
~
N
N
0;
Ol
..;-
lLl
(')
<(
a;
Ld?'--O
oC!J1--
_....../j)
II '"
~ <0 ~ ,L.J
-s:~ N
<:: m 0
"- u .
0) :z: i'-
~ f'l
-l CD CO
~ ::::: 0
Lc LLJ Z
""
"-
,/
,9.
"'/
o
o
""
o
o
n
o
o
N
W
--!
<t:
U
Vi
U
:r:
Q
<t:
0::
<.:l
o
o
o
-------
I
I
I
, ,OS
~
.
tn ~
~ ~
~
~o~
~~g
<.l~':::;
~<st::
&~8
~ ~'
....t::l,i,
...;J;tp
~~~
~ g
~ eo
~!I
~ ~
~IT1E
V~C~Nrrv
MA19
~T~
'.- J ~<.. .". __ .".
~~
~
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'T CODE 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAll. TO
City ofTemecula - City Clerk
POBox 9033, 43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
MAll. TAX STATEMENTS TO
City ofTemecuIa
POBox 9033. 43200 Business Park: Dr.
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES
(Tnrtivirtlllll)
The undersigned, being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its successors
or assigns, for street and highway purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State
of California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto.
It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon
or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local governing bodies or
its successors or assigns.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
representatives of the respective parties hereto.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, tbese presents have executed this instrnmenl
Ibis i"(l/lJT H day of C:-AIf ' 20~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA} SS.
COUNTY OF RP.'ER&:8::; il'1W /)IO..e
On @1IA ~ 2.9 5l.l!l! rm , before me tbe undersigned,
a Notary Public in and lor tbe Slate of California, personally appeared
Print Name and Tille
~
&:~(I&.4~ lilt. W~u\. 1;<14 ~rl/1i~14 L.. W'tlil..
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
10 be lbe person(s) wbose name(s) Ware subscribed 10 lbe wilbin
~;tj~
,ci&l!.nlF@lRlOOn& &1J..IL.~llJJlRl~@$1E &.~~OO@WI!.IE~~IiIIiIIEOOiJ
I
o
State of CA-t.l foftlllt4-
County of $' (f. rJ 1\( 1: ~ 0
On tf/Jl~ (O~,'tQ.9J
:.J:...:f Dale
personally appeared G>'l.OlVk t.
before me, C &.fA ~~'~"d "~:,!?, (~g~J~"~oe. N~!!:~V fJallti"l-e.
""',W'1-IA. Jfa'lC> e.fl~rb7IA 1.., I1Jlt{UL
Name(s) of Signer(s)
l!fPersonally known to me
o proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
I,
~
f.
~e CIJlll1SD.f05IBI
COmmIssIon 0 1131916
~ -d Notary Pub6c - Coifom!a ~
~
MyCOmm. Expires Mar 31. 2lXll
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that ~~/they
executed the same in ~ttr/their authorized capacity(ies),
and that by ~l1E7ltheir signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and 0 'ciai seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
{lJ' fAiGIIl~;JJ
1.Q [;);) Number of Pages:
3
Description of Attached Document
,
I
~
Ie
Title or Type of Document:
(;n.ll<v"r
(g t~
/lJ etlJ t
". ~
Signer's Name:
o Individual
o Corporate Officer
Title(s):
o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
o Attorney-in-Fact
o Trustee
o Guardian or Conservator
o Other: Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
iO 1996 National Notary Association' 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184' Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
Document Date:
/Il~
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
I
I
Signer's Name:
o Individual
o Corporate Officer
Title(s):
o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General
o Attorney-in.Fact
o Trustee
o Guardian or Conservator
o Other: Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
Prod. No. 5907
Reorder. Call Toll-Free '-800-876-6627
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OF ROAD DEDICATION
A portion of Parcel I and 2 of Parcel Map No. 11984 as filed in Book 67 Page 87 of Parcel
Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder, County of Riverside, State of California, (this land
being also recorded pursuant to Riverside County Lot Line Adjustment No. 1639, Approved
March 7, 1983), more particularly described as follows;
Southwesterly 12.00 feet of Parcel 2 of Lot Line Adjustment No. 1639, Approved March 7,
1983.
Containing 3,233.92 SQUARE FEET or 0.074 acres, more or less.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
/(:;::~~2;::':}',::~,\\
" .
'-".
\~;~:~>~,~; ~i5,>
~
,
-It ~,
",9
Qv<: J!, '"
-It 'J!,
...9100. OJ!,":<'J!,
f-J!, OJ!, /V
/ )!. "
A. '<,
'~Wa J!,'VI
o~ '
N><5) bv/, i
I a 0.
I 1 ()fa ~o
1 0 ~
@ja 1 /~
I v-
I _"lgio
co 1 q I 0~0> / iJ:J
egg I :-~rri / 0;
I -"- I"")v""" (
o 00 I ON~ ~ IT!
~ CD I II II II ,: ~
6 1 0:: 1 <J0:::--1 I :z'!::
I() . I <0
Ol "'~" 1 I <C
Z 1 1-' C[J I I-- _IW-
a. q .lI;';>::: 1 ~I -Ill) l{)
< ~.;;;CD 1 ~I ' i- N ~ '"
5.S.c; , 1-1 N~ I"") ) C!J
~ 3' 1 G:l (fl' q -.:- ltl1!!
o.uj-' IT! :::>1' 0 ~
00.1 <f) -,-1 IT:'
IT: 1 ~ 2 0\ 0 w <<; 0"
<( 1 ., <tIQ Q~C[J
0. Qi'-, l{)'
1 ?, wi l{) lL o.i'-,
1 -0) ~I N O~CD
I j W -'I :" 5 -I~
I _ILLI 1--1 -.:-;::;lUo.'
i- 0 0,-0
I ~ <C -,I 2 u. IT:
,I 'Q ~ f2~
'.! I
I C/
1 Q
~ ;j'
'"
C[J
CD
~
~
ci
~
0.
~
ltl
(!J
<(
IT:
uj"O
oC[Jf--.
tc r:: elj
~CD?;_W
~::'E 0;
o.' (!J .0
<:0 2:"'"
-l j:: f'l
lti C!J CD
o ;;; 0
IT: lei 2
~
I
I /'"
-_...// \
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I ,lO'qc:r
I I
, ,0'; I
, ,09
~
;!;~I"
Q2,~
>
u.:
ui
C\/
Ol
M
~
(')
II
<
W
a::
<
O'
og-
io .0
l{)l{)0
.0.0
NVN
ON~
<]11 II II
0:::--1
~
r-
III
-
:r:
><
w
./
,9.
J!,/
1
"I
I"
I "-
1 "-
I
I
1
/
1 ,?0'gL6 L,
1 I
I ,09 I
I
----
<:J" LO,L L.60-'<7
o
o
v
WIZ 0
!;j:~0 z<
a::'~ oa?
~I~ ~<l:
(J)1a:: <l:...J
31U U<l:
...Ji(J)u..O Q.
_,wowu..
010 00
H...J oz
!;ri<3 <0
...JIW o~
Q. , ...J a:: a::
o
Q.
o
o
"l
o
o
N
W
--1
<t:
U
VJ
u
I
Q
<t:
0:::
Cl
o
o
~
&1 0
9;)-<-' ;:'<V(
~ ~%~
'<
~
~
.
N
~ 9
OJ ~
~Rg
u~~
~~~
h~
~~~
N e
~!I
~TEM 1 (0
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: trJ.1/William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: July 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement - Project Design Consultants
Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II, Project No. PWOO-09
PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer
Steve Beswick, Associate Engineer
Laura Bragg, Project Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Approve the agreement with Project Design Consultants to provide professional design
engineering services for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates to
construct Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II, from Showalter Road to Margarita Road,
Project No. PWOO-09 for the not to exceed amount of $125,180.00, and authorize the
Mayor to execute the agreement.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount
of 10% of the contract or $12,518.00.
BACKGROUND: The project as described in the Capital Improvement Program for
Fiscal Years 2000 to 2004 consists of full-width street improvements on Pauba Road.
The scope of work for this project includes the widening of Pauba Road from Showalter Road to
Margarita Road and it will be designed as a four-lane secondary highway with an 88-foot right of way.
The design engineering contract includes the preparation of plans, specifications, cost estimate, and
easement documents. The street improvements consist of asphalt pavement, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, erosion control, street lights, signing, striping, driveway approaches, storm drain facilities,
and traffic signal facilities.
City staff reviewed five proposals for providing professional consultant design services as outlined
in Request for Proposal No. 085. The firms were ranked, and negotiations commenced with the
highest ranked firm, Project Design Consultants of Temecula. Project Design Consultants has
extensive experience in providing civil engineering services for municipal governments. The
geotechnical subconsultant being utilized by Project Design Consultants for this project is K1einfelder.
r:\agdrpt\OO\0711\pwOO-09.awd/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT: The Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II from Showalter Road to Margarita
Road, Project No. PWOo-09 is a Capital Improvement Project funded for design engineering through
Development Impact Fees (Street Improvements). The design engineering contract of $125,180 plus
the 10% contingency of $12,518.00 for a total design engineering contract of $137,698.00. The
preliminary construction estimate for this project is $573,000.
ATTACHMENT:
1. CIP Project Description
2. Location Map
3. Agreement with Project Design Consultants
2
r:\agdrpt\OO\0711\pv.oOO-09.awdlajp
~
'=:
:--
...
^
...
...
Cl::
'-l
'"
"-l
:::
....
'-l
~
.....
'=:
a:
tol
'"
:s
c:
I
'"
i-
Z
tol
~
tol
>
o
c::
0.
~
Q
<
o
Ill:
<
:::l
::i
;:
]
-
f.:
-
"
"
";;-
c:
>-
i-
-
Ill:
o
-
c::
0.
=
~
~
is
..::
"0
'"
o
Ill:
'"
~
::l
'"
0.
"
"
E
-
::I
"G
.s
~
C
o
<.J
c)2
.2 8
:g c
~ .~
u ~
.= u
UO
"
Co C
"'0
i- .-
_ c.
"
" '-
.- "
e ~
o.Q
"
;.
.;:
o
'-
~
;;;
::
51
en
'-
o
-
~
"
::
o
-
-g
o
c::
~
.;:
g,
'-
'"
~
~
is
~
U
"
U
;.
o
'-
c.
~
"
-
'"
.~
~
'-
o
C
.51
"G
.s
~
C
o
u
"0
C
'"
C
Ol)
.;;;
"
"0
oii
.S
~
~
"
g
'-
Co
~;;;
-'" c
is "
~ ~
.~ 2
:0 os:
::I C
0.<.LI
-
"
"
.-
_ 0
C '-
,,0.
E,=
'- "
'" Co
Coo
" "
Q",
-d
~
c::
,g
::I
'"
0.
C
o
on
C
"
E
"
;.
o
'-
Co
E
;:!
.;;;
c
e
,.e
B
on
on
"
u
<.>
'"
"
"0
.::
e
Co
"0
C
'"
C
.51
E
::I
u
'-
'u
<.>
IE
~
"
;.
o
'-
c.
E
-0
.~ 0
""
U.n
.~~
e
0.""
-
on
o
U
t:
"
.-
"
'-
.::c..
,,;;;
~ Q
c:li-
'" -~
i-~
':;; E
'" 0
Uu
~ ..
GiC;
::lQ
t: 0
<i-
0000"
0.0 = el!
=0\0\02
NOMV'l::
:~~JI
~
,
..,
=
=
....
..,
=r
....
=
=
....
....
=r
-
as
....
o 0
o 0
o
N
""
-
=
,
=
.=
=
....
""
=
=
,
~
~
~
-
c
.2 =
~ .9
.:: u
.~ c 2 tn
.- ~--
a "Vi ~ !i
"'0 l:J 0 0
<OUi-
00011'
g ~~I
~~J~1
"" I
on
C
"
E
"
;.
e
Co
E
~
GO
-d
"
l.;:
'':
c
"
:-5!
.~
"
<.>
'-
::I
o
on
OIl
c
:;:;
c
.a
-
"
f::!
-
'"
I
on
"
"
...
-
<.>
'"
",Co
= E
"'-
gc;'
0; " "
< E l.;:
.0 Q..-
.0 .2 g
o~ ~ ~
'" " C
""0::::>
'"
C
::I
"0
"
"G
.s
~
c
o
<.>
"
~
-
o
c
c
'"
u
"G
"
-0'
'-
0.
<>
;.;
-
~
'" ~
U"O
~ g
all""
0'=
" ..
'- "
::l '-
_ ::l
::l '"
""'"
-
t.J
VJ
<(
:c
c..
I ...
...
VJ
....
Z
t.J
:;;:
t.J Ii!
>
0 g
c::
c..
:;;:
Q q.
<(
0 'i
c:: '"
0<
<(
Cl
~
~
~
0
i::
~
'...J
0
""
.... .!!
~ -
1=
- ~
~
.. ~
.~
g: Q -
.. z
c..
<t
Ii>
5'
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
PAUBA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II
PROJECT NO. PWOO-09
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 11, 2000, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Project Design Consultants, ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 11, 2000, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than July 11,
2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged
in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under
this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and
schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Twenty Five
Thousand One Hundred Eighty Dollars and No Cents ($125,180.00) for the total term of the
Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
r:\cip\projecls\pWOO-09\PDC agrmtsiajp
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days
prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work
under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a
portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided
that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this
Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall
allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement.
Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3)
years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make
2
r:'<:ip'I>rojects\pwOO-09\PDC agrmlslajp
available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software
and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other
than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and
all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attomey fees and expert witness
fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain
or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property
arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related
to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the
negligence of the City.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06
92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant
owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General
Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
projecUlocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
3
r:lcip\projects\pwOO-09IPDC agrmlslajp
(3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than AVII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
4
r:\cip\projects\pINOO-09\PDC agrmtslajp
f. Verification of Coveraae. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are
in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The
City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of
the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity
to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to
review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
5
r:\cip\projecls\pwOO-09\PDC agrmtslajp
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Project Design Consultants
701 "B" Street, Suite 800
San Diego, California 92101
Attention: Robert F. Kieshing, P.E.
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only
Robert F. Kieshin9, P.E., Vice President shall perform the services described in this Agreement.
Robert F. Kieshin9 may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the
services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the
departure of Robert F. Kieshin9 from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's
employ, the City shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days
of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole
compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of
termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of Califomia shall govem the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attomey fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
17. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of
Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
6
r:lcip\projecls\pwOO-09\PDC agrmlsiajp
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant convenants and agrees to their knowledge
that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the
contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the
knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be
made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict
of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 9commencing with Section
1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
178. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
7
r:\cip\projecls\pwOO-09\PDC agrmtsiajp
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Project Design Consultants
701 "B" Street, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 235-6471
Robert F. Kieshing, Vice President
By:
Name:
Title:
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
8
r:lciplprojeclslpwOO-09\PDC agrmlslajp
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
9
~
PJr!l(>C! [)e'l'l/.!,Jl ()JJlslIl/{[JlfS
1'1 \ \. I \. I,
I' I: H I :\ (;
" I '" \ r I l\'(
24 Years ojExcellf'nce. /976-2000
File: FOO-433
June 20, 2000
RECEiVED
JUN 222000
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEERJNG DEPARTMENT
Mr. Steven Beswick, PE
Associate Engineer
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: RFP #085 - Pauba Road Improvements Phase II (Project No. PWOO-09)
Dear Mr. Beswick,
As discussed by phone on June 20th, attached is our revised scope and fee schedule for the
above-referenced project.
We appreciate the opportunity and look forward to working with you on this project. If you
have any questions, please call Mike Medofer at 909-506-4007, or me at 619-235-6471.
Sincerely,
r;?;f ~~
Robert F. KieSling,- PE - J
Vice President
CON\O-4J3L TRREVISED.DOC
"III
I) "lllTl
\lIilc."lIll
"'.111 [J]._
(.dit;,r",
'!~](J I
_;~ 10.1-1
. ,\ 2' I-I).'H')
. ..: "\Jl'lIll'V'I'r<)].cl[,lOI~'Jl,<..')1l1
@ I',JI''''
I~" " ,Ie- J
~
File: FOO-433
June 20, 2000
Pagelof7
Prc~iect De.""'ZQ,11 Cw 1,...,"ulttlJ It'.
I' L . \ :-.: :-.. 1 '. l~ [. \, ( , I \ I
[ '\ (,
, l R \ 1-. ~ I \ t;
24 Years of Excellence. 1976-2000
lEXHlIlBl!1' 'A' - SCOPlE OlF WOlRJI(
PAUlBA ROAD IMPROVlEMlENTS
Cl!1'Y OlF 'fEMlEClUJLA, CAUlFOlRNIA
General Description: Prepare a complete set of street widening plans for Pauba Road from
Showalter Road to the existing improvements at the Margarita Road intersection. This portion of
the road will be designated as a secondary highway with an 88-foot full width right-of-way.
I. PROJECT MANAGEMENT/QUALITY CONTROL
A. Proiect Coordination: This task involves the overall coordination of all agencies
involved, including the City, private home owners, developers of adjacent
properties, permitting agencies (such as Corps of Engineers, US Fish and
Wildlife, California Department ofFish and Game, and the California Department
of Water Resources). PDC will consult with these agencies, noticing them for
meetings, providing them with current information regarding design and
scheduling, as well as identifying their needs and requirements to facilitate the
project.
The second aspect of project coordination is the coordination of the project team
on all of the tasks required to complete the project on schedule. PDC will hold
regular project coordination meetings with the team members where tasks and
schedule are reviewed, as well as other issues capable of affecting the schedule.
B. Meetings: PDC will organize regular meetings to update City staff and will
prepare agendas and meeting notes. At each meeting, we will review the schedule
and budget, and will develop an action plan for tasks to be accomplished, as well
as update previous action plans to identify items completed and remaining. This
task assumes there will be six meetings during the design process: kickoff,
preliminary design, 30%, 70%, 90% and one "floating" meeting.
C. Quality Control/Qualitv Assurance: At the beginning of the project, the Project
Manager will hold an in-house meeting to review the project with appropriate key
consultants. A list of issues will be developed from this meeting, which will then
be discussed with the City staff and used to guide the preliminary stages of the
investigation and survey work. During development of the work product, an
independent in-house review will be conducted as a quality control check, to
verify the suitability ofthe design.
COS 0-mSCPREVISED,DOC
ill
H:-'llL'L'(
\Lllll"!,OI)
"".lIllk,:l>
l',dit;lIlli.t
'1:'101
L I ') .~ i" ,~
1.\\:'\ i',
Fl1lail <'''IL. "role((dc~i~Il.L'-'1l1
@ '.'1'''
'{,,\,k,1
File: FOO-433
June 20. 1000
Page 1 of7
D. Schedule: PDC will produce a detailed schedule of design tasks, indicating critical
path items. The schedule will be regularly reviewed and updated. Critical path
items will be highlighted and given special scrutiny.
E. Permits: This task will be to coordinate the activities leading to issuance of
various permits required for this project. Coordination will involve meeting with
affected agencies, developing approaches, strategies, work programs, and
schedules, as well as monitoring progress toward permit issuance.
II. SURVEYING, MAPPING, AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ENGINEERING
A. Design Surveys
I. Cross Section Surveys: Perform field cross-section surveys of the existing
hardscape improvement features at 50-foot intervals. Locate existing curb,
gutter and pavement elevations. Cross-section survey will also include
topography of property adjacent to the roadway in the location of potential
cut or fills, and topography in areas where drainage may be extended to the
creek.
2. Design Topographic Surveys: Design surveys include locating of
geotechnical investigation boring, pit, and trenching sites; locating of
existing utilities accessible from the surface including dipping manholes;
locating utility potholing operations; locating of other improvement features
in support of engineering design efforts.
3. Aerial Mapping:
a. Is to be provided by the City. The City will obtain and provide to
PDC digital aerial mapping, including horizontal control, and backup
survey information to allow PDC to coordinate field surveys with
aerial mapping.
b. PDC will plot aerial mapping at I-inch = 40-feet scale on base sheets
for use in design.
B. Right-of-Way Engineering
I. Landnet Retracement Survey/Base Map: Review title reports, research maps
of public record, establishment of right-of-way centerline and sidelines,
plotting of pertinent easements of record, annotating of all lines. and
preparation of a landnet base layer for insertion into the project's digital
AutoCAD base map files.
CON\0-433SCPREVISED.DOC
File: FOO-433
June 20, 2000
Page 3 of7
2. Right-ol-Way Documents: Preparation of legal descriptions and plats for
slope easements, drainage channel easement, and temporary construction
easements.
3. Right-ol-Way Monumentation Survey: Field survey eXlstmg right-of-way
and property comer monuments; prepare and file corner records for
monuments anticipated to be destroyed by construction; reset destroyed
monuments, if required and file corner records; survey in new centerline
well monuments; and prepare and file a record of survey with the County of
Riverside.
III. GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
A. Field Investigation: Kleinfelder will perform field investigation by drilling
approximately 7 to 8 exploratory borings along the subject alignment. It is
anticipated borings will be spaced at approximately 1,000-foot intervals along the
south side of the existing roadway.
In addition to the drilling operation, asphalt concrete cores will be taken within
the existing roadway in order to evaluate the structural integrity of the pavement.
We anticipate taking 5 to 6 core samples along the roadway. Within each core
location, the pavement thickness, i.e., asphalt concrete and aggregate base, if any,
will be measured and subgrade soil samples will be obtained and returned to the
laboratory for further evaluation.
B. Laboratory Testing: Laboratory testing will be performed on selected samples.
The laboratory program will include unit weight, moisture content, sieve analysis,
maximum density/optimum moisture content, corrosion testing, sand equivalent,
direct shear, consolidation/collapse potential and R-Value testing. The selected
type and frequency of testing will be based on the subsurface conditions
encountered.
C. Analysis and Report Preparation: Results of -the field exploration, laboratory
testing, and engineering analyses will be summarized in a report containing the
following, as a minimum:
I. A description of the proposed project, including a map showing the
approximate boring locations;
2. A description of the surface and subsurface site conditions encountered
during the field investigation;
3. Evaluation of the local and regional tectonic setting and historical seismic
activity, including possible associated geology-related hazards;
CQN\O-433SCPREVISED.DOC
File: FOO-433
June 20, 2000
Page 4 of7
4. Recommendations related to the geotechnical aspects of:
a. Roadway grading; including establishing potential soil removal and
replacement areas;
b. Temporary excavations, shoring and trench backfill;
c. Construction methods and requirements for pipe bedding and trench
backfill, including applicability of jetting;
d. Description of the on-site material and analysis of suitability as
backfill, including, but not limited to, sand equivalent testing;
e. Permanent slopes and erosion protection, including gram-size
distribution for scour analysis;
f. Uniform Building Code (UBC) seismic site coefficients for use in
structural analysis;
g. Earth retaining walls (if any are proposed);
h. An evaluation of the existing pavement with respect to the structural
integrity, including overlay thickness or complete removal, whichever
is appropriate;
I. Recycle requirements of existing pavement and aggregate base
materials;
J. Pavement Design usmg the latest traffic index for the proposed
roadway.
IV. ROADWAY/CIVIL DESIGN
A. Research
1. Existing Improvements and Utilities: We will gather all available
information on existing street improvements and utilities within the area of
impact of the project. All relevant improvements and utilities will be plotted
on the improvement plans. We will research appropriate standards for the
roadway within the City.
2. Adjacent Development Needs: As a part of the design effort, PDC will
discuss with the City and adjacent property owners (where appropriate) to
determine access needs.
3. Right alWay/Easements: PDC will review records to research existing right
of way and easements. All existing right of way and easements will be
plotted on the improvement plans.
CON\0-433SCPREVlSED.DQC
File: FOO-433
June 20, 2000
Page 5 of7
B. Preliminary Design: PDC currently anticipates that the widening wiII occur on the
south ot the eXIstmg improvements. However, we wiII review the existing street
plans, the roadway cross-sections from the survey data and the Geotechnical
analyses of the existing pavement to determine the recommended vertical
alignment of the proposed roadway, as well as the extent, if any of pavement
rehabilitation. Preliminary plans wiII identify the proposed vertical alignment, and
indicate where the proposed curb and right of way will be located. We wiII
discuss these recommendations with the City before proceeding to 30% design.
C. 30% Design Level Effort: PDC wiII submit 30% design plan sets to the City for
reView. The CIty Will also submit plans to the utility companies for their review.
30% design plans will include street cross sections, horizontal and vertical
alignments, right of way and easements, storm drainage culverts and inlets, and
existing utilities.
PDC will review existing drainage reports for the north side of the road and wiII
make recommendations for any improvements deemed necessary. We will also
perform a hydrologic analysis of the proposed widening to determine inlet
spacing and a hydraulic analysis to size and locate storm drain culverts. Reports
and recommendations wiII conform to RCFC and Temecula Standards. Details
wiII be provided for transmitting storm runoff into existing watercourses. Inlets
wiII be provided at regular intervals to assure street drainage meets Temecula and
County dry lane standards.
We will address any comments provided by the City or the utilities, and modify
the plans to reflect comments as required. An engineer's cost estimate wiII be
provided with the submittal for City review.
D. 70% Design Level Effort: PDC will submit 70% design plan sets to the City for
reVIew. 70% level Will mclude traffic signal relocation plans, signing and striping,
proposed streetlights and utilities, and slope stabilization specifications. We wiII
address any comments provided by the City. An updated engineer's cost estimate
will be provided with the submittal for City review.
E. 90% Design Level of Effort: The 90 % design will address all comments from the
prevIOUS submIttals, and any new issues arising during the process. An updated
engineer's cost estimate will be provided with the submittal for City review.
F. Specifications, Final Design/Final Plans: PDC wiII prepare the technical
speCIfIcatIons and review the entue bid specification package to include the City's
boilerplate, bidder's instruction, bid sheets, general specifications, special
provisions, and technical specifications. Draft special provisions will be provided
with the 70% submittal for City review and comments. The entire bid
specification package will be submitted for review with the 90% submittal.
CON"0-433SCPREVISED.DOC
File: FOO-433
June 20, 2000
Page 6 00
PDC will submit stamped and signed engineering drawings, along with the final
version of the specification package and engineer's cost estimate for inclusion in
the bid package. It is estimated that the bid package will include the following
drawings:
1. Cover and details 2 sheets
2. Plan and profile 5 sheets
3. Signing and striping 5 sheets
4. Traffic signal relocation 1-2 sheets
5. Storm drainage 2- 3 sheets
G. Postbid Construction Services: The PDC team will attend the prebid meeting and
one preconstruction conference, and will respond to questions regarding the
design and specifications during the bid and the construction process. PDC will
also review contractor submittals.
V. UTILITY POTHOLING
PDC will locate existing utilities by potholing. It is estimated that four potholes will be
needed.
ASSUMPTIONS/EXCLUSIONS
1. The City will provide copies of as-built existing improvement and utility plans including
road structural sections.
2. The City will provide existing right-of-way and easement documents and preliminary title
reports.
3. The City to be responsible for utility coordination.
4. Aerial topo mapping will be provided by the City.
5. As built drawings are not included as part of this scope.
6. Traffic control plans are not included as part of this scope.
7. Landscape plans not included as part of this scope.
8. Erosion control plans are not included as part of this scope.
9. Travel time for San Diego staff to come to Temecula is not reimbursable.
C01\'\0433SCPREvrSED.DOC
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
10
CON\0-433SCPREVISED.DOC
File: FOO-433
June 20, 2000
Page 7 of7
JFlElE SUMMARY
PAUJBA ROAD iMPROVlEMEN'fS
CITY OJF 'flEMlEiCULA, iCAUJFORNiA
Task I Project Management $ 18,340
Task II Survey/Mapping/Right-of- W ay
A. Survey $ 7,530
B. Right-of-Way Engineering $ 11,716
Task III Geotechnical $ 11,800
Task IV Roadway/Civil Design
A. Research $ 4,788
B. Preliminary Design $ 9,115
C. 30% Design $ 18,830
D. 70% Design $ 13,473
E. 90% Design $ 11,970
F. Final Design $ 6,418
G. Construction Services $ 3,203
Task V Utility Potholing $ 3,000
$ 120,180
Reimbursables $ 5,000
TOTAL CONTRACT $ 125,180
- c
:g ;:
o 0
Q.-c
O~
.. III
Q. GI
"0 ..
IlllXl
o ..
a:: ::l
o
Ill.c
.Q'
::l C
III III
Q.~
'"
...
~
<J7
'"
0> Ol
"
J:
<J7
LO t ~ ...
;:: E =a~
E 'u :ll
~~E..J
'"
...
...
o
CO
<J7
'" c:
0> Gl
'"
CO
<J7J:
'" Ol
~ CO
~ E
o
.:
<J71-
"''''
;:: .=
iii
Gl
<J7S2
'" ~
~.!
~ 0
"
Gl
<J7::!;
Q)
ill
0::
,.,
Gl ~
1: e
" "
Ul
~ ~
._ Gl
:e.-g
" Gl
Ol..J
is
'"
c:
W
~
Ul
iO
"
.;:
Gl
<3
.,.
"'",
'"
'"
.,.
o
o
<(
u
.,.
00
NO
"!.
...
'"
c:
W
~
Ul
.,.
"'",
.......
...
on
co
Cl.
'U
c:
.;:
ll.
.,.
<DO
en
'"
~
'"
::!;
.,.
00
0>",
"!.
o
...
'e-
ll.
-
c: c:
Gl 0
E (/) 'en
.. ~ c:
",,,Q)
ca 0 X
C:J:W
CO
::!;
-
"
..
'0'
~
ll.
-"
Ol
CO
I-
o
...
M.
CO
...
o
M
'"
,..:
.,.
.,.
"""N<OOO
NC"") 'I"""" 0)
.... '"
M N
.,.
.,. .,.
.,.
Oo'Q"o
",NCO
en '"
N
.,. .,.
"'0
'"
...
"'CO
CO....
en
.,.
o NO
en
.,. .,.
OotOo
NOr-CO
"!. 0
ui
...
.,. .,.
<DO
....
'"
.,.
NO
M
'"
.,.
"'CO
NCO
'"
.,.
.,.
c: c:
o 0
'm 'in
(/) c (/) C
:J Q.) :; III
0><0><
IWIW
,.,
..
1:
"
Ul
=
-"
Ol
CO
I-<{ o:l
'"
...
.....
...
...
.,.
.,.
o
o
"!.
...
...
.,.
E
"
Ul
Cl.
E
"
..J
CO
CO
....
.,f
.,.
COo
...
'"
COo
'"
M
.,.
000
NOCO
"'.
...
'"
...
...
en
.,.
o
M
CO
ui
...
.,.
0'"
O<D
...
ui
.,.
M
....
...
..;
...
.,.
00
0'"
'"
on
.,.
OCO
ON
o
.,f
.,.
o
....
"!.
...
...
.,.
CO
...
...
ui
.,.
o
...
'"
N
.,.
LO a>."O LO 0 -.::t LO
a.ri~C")OCOgLO~LOgN2o)S
N~~ ,....~ CO N ,.... N 0)
NM,....-llfoqfN'
"'00
"'~
...
-
c:
CO
-
-=
Ol
c:
o
"
.c
"
Ul
1:"
.:
"
..
-
o
Gl
C)
:~
u-5
ro
;:: Q)
OJ>
-" Q)
Olo::
~.d:
-"
OJ>
CO
I-
.,.
.,.
.,.
.,.
~",CO
~'"
"'.
...
.,.
.,.
0000>11)0
,....C"'>1t) CION
0......
"f CO; ('\1-
.,.
.,.
NO
M
'"
c c c c c c c
o 000 0 0 0
'en 'en 'en 'en "in "in 'in
(/) c (/) c ~ c (/) C (/) C (/) C (/) C
.- :; ID ~ Q.) ~ Q.) :; Q.) ~ Q.) ~ Q.) :; ID
> Ox Ox Ox Ox Ox Ox Ox
UIWIWIWIWIWIWIW
Q)
en
c:
o
U
"
~
<n
c:
o
(.)
.,.
000
"'~'"
.... ...
... ...
.,.
.,.
c:
'"
'in
Q)
o
.S
OJ
~
J:l..
o:l
.,.
NO
M
'"
c:
'"
'in
Q)
o
~
o
o
'"
(.)
.,.
.,.
.,.
"'M
~ ....
...
.,.
<DO<D
en
'"
.,.
c:
'"
-in
Q)
o
~
o
o
....
o
.,.
o
o
M
N
.,.
NO
M
'"
.,.
0'"
en
'"
.,.
c:
'"
'in
Q)
o
~
o
o
0>
W
'"
N~
~ ....
...
c:
'"
'in
Q)
o
ro
c:
u:
u.
.,.
00
~'"
....
~
.,.
.,.
000
"'~'"
... ....
...
.,.
(9
M
o
'"
..;
.,.
.,.
.,.
.,.
.,.
.,.
o
o
O.
M
.,.
E
"
Ul
Cl.
E
"
..J
.:
"
CO
..
~
'"
.5
(5
.:
-
o
ll.
,.,
::
:;:;
~
>
-"
Ol
CO
I-
o
CO
...
o
'"
~
.,.
o
o
o
on
o
CO
...
on
'"
...
.,.
.,.
iO
-
o
-
.c
"
Ul
OJ>
Gl
:c
co
l!!
"
.c
E
'Qj
0::
iO
-
o
I-
o
~TEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: July 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Renewal of Annual Street Striping Contract - Project No. PW97-28
PREPARED BY: Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Approve the second amendment of the Street Striping Contract with Pacific Striping, Inc.
of Whittier for Fiscal Year 2000-2001, for a period of one (1) year beginning July 1, 2000,
in an amount of $150,000.00
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $15,000.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: At the regular City Council meeting of December 16, 1997 the
Street Striping Contract for FY97-98, Project No. PW97-28 was awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder, Pacific Striping Inc., of Whittier. Pacific Striping, Inc., has performed
satisfactory work during the past year and has responded efficiently in all emergency situations.
During FY99-00, Pacific Striping Inc. provided striping services to the City for a total cost of
$165,000.00. The total cost of service was allocated as follows:
$140,000.00 For new and repainted striping approximately
$ 5,000.00 For sandblasting legends and striping approximately
$ 5,000.00 For the Blue Dot program to mark fire hydrant locations
$ 15,000.00 For various category 1 and 2 intersection restriping projects
The original Contract contains provisions that allows the Contract to be extended on a yearly
basis by mutual agreement of both parties for up to three (3) years by the prevailing
construction cost index. The proposed contract limit of $150,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2000-2001
to cover the cost of maintaining new streets recently accepted into the street system and to
complete additional Category I and II intersection improvements.
R:\agdrpl\2000\711/pw97 -98s1riping exl/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are included in the FY1999-00 Budget for this contract
extension under Public Works Street Maintenance Division Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-
164-601-5410 and Traffic Division Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-602-5410 for the
contract of $150,000.00 and the contingency amount of $15,000.00 for a total contract amount
of $165,000.00.
ATTACHMENTS:
Second Amendment
2
R:\agdrpl\2000\711/pw97-98s1riping ex1lajp
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY OF TJEMJECUJLA AND
PACW][C STRIPING, INC.
STlRJEET STllUPJING CONTRACT FOR lFY97-98
PROJECT NO. PW97-28
TIDS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 11, 2000 by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City'') and Pacific Striping, Inc. ("Contractor''). In consideration of the
mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and prnposes:
A. On December 16, 1997 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Contract
entitled "City of Temecula Contract for Street Striping Services" ("Contract").
B. The Contract was first amended on July 27, 1999. The Contract as amended shall
commence on July 11 th, 2000.
C. The parties now desire to amend the Contract as set forth in this Amendment.
2. Section 4 of the Contract is hereby amended to read as follows:
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. Compensation shall be for all services as
described in this Contract and shall not exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents
($300,000.00) and shall be paid pursuant to Section 4 of this Contract.
3. Section 5 of the Contract is hereby amended to read as follows:
"TERM This Contract shall commence on December 16, 1997 and services shall be extended
to the 30th day of June, 2001.
5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the
Contract shall remain in full force and effect.
R:\cip\projects\pw97\pw97-28\P ACIFICAMEND#2/ajp
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed the day and
year fIrst above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
PACIFIC STRIPING, INC.
P.O. Box 1691
Whittier, CA 90609
(502) 945-7805
Scott Fisher, President
R:\cip\projects\pw97\pw97-28\P ACIFICAMEND#2/ajp
~TEM 12
ORDINANCE 2000-1)6
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PRIMA FACIE
SPEED LIMIT ON CERTAIN STREETS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary
to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of
streets.
WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order to
determine the appropriate speed limits,
WHEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segment of roadway designated in
this Ordinance indicates that the following speed limits be established given the engineering and
traffic studies.
SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as
follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets:
"Name of Street and
Portion Affected
Declared Prima
Facie SDeed Limit.
Miles Per Hour
Amarita Way -
Pio Pico Road to McCabe Drive
40
Butterfield Stage Road -
Pauba Road to De Portola Road
55
Butterfield Stage Road -
De Portola Road to State Route 79
50'
Cabrillo Avenue -
Jedediah Smith Road to Vallejo Avenue
35
Calle Chapos -
Walcott Lane to Calle Girasol
30
Calle Girasol -
Calle Chapos to Nicolas Road
30
Calle Pina Colada -
Del Rey Road to La Serena Way
25
Ords/2000-06
Ordsl2000-06
De Portola Road -
Jedediah Smith Road to Campanula Way
45
De Portola Road -
Campanula Way to Butterfield Stage Road
40
Del Rey Road -
Jedediah Smith Road to Avenida Del Reposo
35
Del Rio Road -
Via Montezuma to Jefferson Avenue
35
Diaz Road -
Winchester Road to Rancho California Road
45
Jedediah Smith Road -
Ynez Road to Margarita Road
40
Jefferson Avenue -
North City Limits to Winchester Road
50
Jefferson Avenue -
Winchester Road to Rancho California Road
40
La Paz Street -
State Route 79 to Ynez Road
35
La Serena Way -
Margarita Road to Walcott Lane
45
Leena Way -
Montelegro Way to Campanula Way
40
Margarita Road -
North City Limits to Winchester Road
50
Margarita Road -
Winchester Road to Pio Pico Road
45
Margarita Road -
Pio Pico Road to State Route 79
40
Meadows Parkway-
Rancho California Road to De Portola Road
45
Meadows Parkway-
De Portola Road to State Route 79
40
Mira Loma Drive -
Rancho Vista Road to Rancho Vista Road
30
2
Ordsl2000-06
Montelegro Way -
Pio Pico Road to McCabe Drive
40
Moraga Road -
Rancho California Road to Margarita Road
40
Nicolas Road -
Winchester Road to Calle Medusa
45
Nicolas Road -
Calle Medusa to Calle Girasol
30
North General Kearny-
Margarita Road to Calle Pina Colada
40
Old Town Front Street-
Santiago Road to State Route 79
40
Overland Drive -
Commerce Center Drive to Jefferson Avenue
35
Overland Drive -
Jefferson Avenue to Margarita Road
40
Pauba Road -
Ynez Road to Margarita Road
45
Pauba Road -
Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road
50
Pio Pico Road -
De Portola Road to Margarita Road
30
Pio Pico Road -
Margarita Road to Amarita Way
35
Preece Lane -
Ynez Road to Ynez Road
35
Pujol Street -
Sixth Street to First Street
25
Pujol Street-
First Street to South End
30
Rancho California Road -
West City Limits to Diaz Road
50
Rancho California Road -
Diaz Road to Moraga Road
40
3
Rancho California Road -
Moraga Road to Margarita Road 50
Rancho Califomia Road -
Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road 55
Rancho Vista Road -
Ynez Road to Butterfield Stage Road 45
Roripaugh Road -
Winchester Road to Nicolas Road 25
Santiago Road -
Old Town Front Street to Ynez Road 35
Solana Way -
Ynez Road to Margarita Road 40
Solana Way-
Margarita Road to Del Rey Road 45
Sunny Meadows Drive -
Campanula Way to Jerez Lane 35
Via Norte -
Solana Way to Avenida Del Reposo 35
Walcott Lane -
La Serena Way to Calle Chapos 30
Winchester Road -
Diaz Road to Jefferson Avenue 40
Wolf Valley Road -
Pala Road to East City Limits 55
Ynez Road -
Equity Road to Jedediah Smith Road 45
SECTION 2. Severabilitv. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be posted as required by law.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Ordsl2OOO-06
4
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage;
and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers
voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 2000.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 2000-06 was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the27'h day of June, 2000 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11th day of July, 2000, by
the following vote:
AYES:
o
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
o
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
o
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ordsl2000-<<>
5
EXHIBIT "A"
"Name of Street and
Portion Affected"
Declared Prima
Facie Speed Limit.
Miles Per Hour
Amarita Way -
Pio Pico Road to McCabe Drive
40
Butterfield Stage Road -
Pauba Road to De Portola Road
55*
Butterfield Stage Road -
De Portola Road to State Route 79
50*
Cabrillo Avenue -
Jedediah Smith Road to Vallejo Avenue
35
Calle Chap os -
Walcott Lane to Calle Girasol
30
Calle Girasol -
Calle Chapos to Nicolas Road
30
Calle Pina Colada -
Del Rey Road to La Serena Way
25
De Portola Road -
Jedediah Smith Road to Campanula Way
45*
De Portola Road -
Campanula Way to Butterfield Stage Road
40*
Del Rey Road -
Jedediah Smith Road to Avenida Del Reposo
35
Del Rio Road -
Via Montezuma to Jefferson Avenue
35
Diaz Road -
Winchester Road to Rancho California Road
45
Jedediah Smith Road -
Ynez Road to Margarita Road
40
Jefferson A venue -
North City Limits to Winchester Road
50
Jefferson Avenue -
Winchester Road to Rancho California Road
40
Ordsl2OllO-06
6
La Paz Street -
State Route 79 to Ynez Road
35
La Serena Way -
Margarita Road to Walcott Lane
Leena Way -
Montelegro Way to Campanula Way
45
40'
Margarita Road -
North City Limits to Winchester Road
50
Margarita Road -
Winchester Road to Pio Pico Road
45
Margarita Road -
Pio Pico Road to State Route 79
40'
Meadows Parkway-
Rancho California Road to De Portola Road
45'
Meadows Parkway-
De Portola Road to State Route 79
40'
Mira Loma Drive -
Rancho Vista Road to Rancho Vista Road
30
Montelegro Way -
Pia Pico Road to McCabe Drive
40
Moraga Road -
Rancho California Road to Margarita Road
40
Nicolas Road -
Winchester Road to Calle Medusa
45
Nicolas Road -
Calle Medusa to Calle Girasol
30
North General Keamy-
Margarita Road to Calle Pina Colada
40'
Old Town Front Street-
Santiago Road to State Route 79
40
Overland Drive -
Commerce Center Drive to Jefferson Avenue
35'
Overland Drive -
Jefferson Avenue to Margarita Road
40'
Pauba Road -
Ynez Road to Margarita Road
45
Ordsl2OOO-06
7
Pauba Road -
Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road 50.
Pio Pico Road -
De Portola Road to Margarita Road 30
Pio Pico Road -
Margarita Road to Amarita Way 35.
Preece Lane -
Ynez Road to Ynez Road 35
Pujol Street -
Sixth Street to First Street 25.
Pujol Street -
First Street to South End 30
Rancho California Road -
West City Limits to Diaz Road 50
Rancho California Road -
Diaz Road to Moraga Road 40.
Rancho California Road -
Moraga Road to Margarita Road 50
Rancho California Road -
Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road 55
Rancho Vista Road -
Ynez Road to Butterfield Stage Road 45
Roripaugh Road -
Winchester Road to Nicolas Road 25
Santiago Road -
Old Town Front Street to Ynez Road 35
Solana Way -
Ynez Road to Margarita Road 40.
Solana Way -
Margarita Road to Del Rey Road 45
Sunny Meadows Drive -
Campanula Way to Jerez Lane 35
Via Norte -
Solana Way to Avenida Del Reposo 35
Ords/2000-06
8
Walcott Lane -
La Serena Way to Calle Chap os
30
Winchester Road -
Diaz Road to Jefferson Avenue
40
Wolf Valley Road -
Pala Road to East City Limits
55*
Ynez Road -
Equity Road to Jedediah Smith Road
45*
* Revised and/or First Time Speed Survey
Ordsl2000-06
9
~TEM 13
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.050 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REVISING THE SALARY FOR
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER
MONTH AS PROVIDED IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
36516 AND PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF
NECESSARY EXPENSES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. Govemment Code Section 36516 provides that council members in
a city with a population of 50,000 to 75,000 persons are authorized to receive a salary of
$500.00 per month. The population of a city for the purposes of establishing council
member salaries may be based upon either a federal census or an estimate of
population validated by the California Department of Finance.
B. The population of the City of Temecula is 53,791 persons as
validated by the California Department of Finance.
Section 2. Section 2.04.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"2.04.050 Compensation
"A. In accordance with Government Code Section 36516, each
council member shall be entitled to a salary of in the amount of
five hundred dollars ($500.00) per month.
"B. Upon the submission of an itemized account, any council
member may be reimbursed for the actual and necessary
expenses incurred in the performance of official duty. The Council
may, by resolution, establish a schedule of actual and necessary
expenses incurred in the performance of official duty for which
council members may be reimbursed."
Section 3. As required by Government Code Section 36516.5, council
members shall not be eligible for the $500.00 salary described in Section 1 of this Ordinance
until the term of office begins for council members elected at the November 2001 General
Municipal Election. Until such time, council members shall continue to receive $300.00 per
month in salary.
Ords/2000-07
Section 4. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would
have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact
that anyone or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise
invalid.
Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published
and posted in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 11th day of July, 2000.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[Seal]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2000-07 was duly introduced and placed upon
its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of June, 2000, and that,
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 11th day of July, 2000, by the following roll call:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AYES:
NOES:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ordsl2000-07
2
~TEM 14
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION NO. 2.40.050 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
APPOINTMENT OF CITY COMMISSIONERS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findinas. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds the
following:
A. That there is a need to amend Section 2.40.050 regarding the appointment of
City Commissioners.
B. The City has the need to maintain five-member Commissions, and is at times
unable to make a four-fifths majority appointment.
C. A simple majority appointment is acceptable under the law and is at the
discretion of the City Council.
Section 2. Section 2.40.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read:
"Members of each commission shall be nominated by an ad hoc committee of two
council members subject to the approval of a majority of the city council. A majority of the
council may remove an appointee for good cause. The chairperson and vice-chairperson of
each commission shall be selected by a majority of the membership of that commission."
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the
Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 2000.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ordsl200Q..08
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 2000-08 was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of June, 2000 and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11th
day of July, 2000, by the following vote:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AYES:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Ordsl200lJ..08
2
TEMECUlA COMMUN~TY
SERV~CES D~STR~CT
~T[EM 1
I1IlINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR I1IlEETING
OF THE TEI1IlECULA COI1llI1llUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
APRIL 27, 2000
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order
at 8:30 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
President Comerchero presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5
DIRECTORS:
Nagger, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, and
Comerchero
ABSENT:
o
DIRECTORS:
None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COI1llI1llENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 29, 2000;
1.2 Approve the minutes of March 21, 2000.
MOTION: Director Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item NO.1. The motion was
seconded by Director Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DIRECTOR OF COI1llI1llUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No comments.
GENERAL I1IlANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
Minules.csdl042700
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:31 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday,
May 9, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.csdl042700
2
~TEM ;2
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community servi~
July 11, 2000
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Chaparral Pool - Design Contract Phase II
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
1)
Approve a Design Services Agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc., in the amount
of $210,094 to complete the second phase of the design process for the Chaparral
High School Swimming Pool.
2)
Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $21 ,010 for the phase II design of the
Chaparral High School Swimming Pool project.
BACKGROUND: Over the past five months, our consultant, RJM Design Group, Inc.,
has conducted design committee meetings and community workshops to develop consensus on the
amenities that would be included at the Chaparral High School Swimming Complex. Members of
the City Council, Community Services Commission, the Temecula Valley Unified School District, staff
and community members, participated in the design process.
The final conceptual master plan for the swim complex was presented and approved by the
Community Services Commission on June 12, 2000 and by the Board of Directors on June 27, 2000.
With final approval obtained, it would be staff's recommendation that we move forward and award
a contract to RJM Design Group, Inc., for phase II of the design process. Phase II will consist of the
development of plans, specifications and construction documents for the project. It will also involve
the selection of colors and materials that will be used to construct the pool.
The Chaparral High School Swimming Pool complex will consist of a 25 yard x 25 meter swimming
pool, which is 7' in depth across eight lanes, with a 3 l!'> foot depth entry. This design will provide
for competitive swim, water polo and also recreational activities. Adjacent to the competitive pool
will be a smaller recreation pool consisting of four lanes with a 3' entry depth progressing to 12'
depth to accommodate a one meter diving board. A zero depth water spray play area is also
included in the master plan and will be bid as an add alternate to the project. The facility also
includes adequate deck space, spectator bleachers and seating, storage areas, staff offices,
restrooms, lockers and showers, and the necessary mechanical area.
F:\DeplsICSDIZIGLERGIREPORT\071100 BOD Ijm pool deslgn_doc
FISCAL IMPACT: The attached Design Services Agreement for construction
documents, plans and specifications, is $210,094. The staff report also requests a 10% contingency
for the project in the amount of $21,010. These funds are available in the Capital Improvement
Budget account 210-190-170-5802.
ATTACHMENTS:
Design Services Agreement
F:\OeplsICSDIZIGLERGIREPORT\071100 BOD ~m pool design.doc
10
[]
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
~
e
~
'=l
t;
~
c
g:
~
o
o
Q.,
~
z
-
~
~
~
VJ
...1
o
o
:r:
u
VJ
:r:
~
-
::e
...1
i:ii
0::
<(
Q,
-<
:r:
u
..Y
-
E=
-
...
..
.-
co
..
Q.,
-
-
;;.:
E-
li!
o
Ii!
=-
o
o
-=
u
VJ
-=
on
::
~
0.
'"
-=
u
1U
o
o
0.
on
C
's
13
.~
'"
'"
....
o
c
.S!
'is
2
~
c
o
u
"
;S
'"
"E
~
o
-
.,
'"
c
.a
"
-
=
or>
'C
~8
""u
..
Q,c
>'co
Eo- 0=
- 0.
... .-
.. ..
0_ y.
co '"
.. ..
Q.,Q
-=
on
::
]
~
0.
'"
-=
U
-
'"
o
o
0.
on
C
's
E
.~
.,
'"
-
u
2
-
.,
c
o
u
>,
~
'0
.-
.~
'is
'C
-
.,
is
gld
-= Ii
u'"
VJ =
-
'" .,
"'"
S ~
:5ij
>'''
.!!:-s!
- .,
~ ~
'" .€'
:;u
., u >,
" "13 or>
.2
~ "",
ur-~
",,,,=
~!all
'2 >. 0
=--
euo
g~]
Ut-~
..
...
..
.-
.w =
c ..
..Q.,
E-
t: co
.. ..
Cl.Cl.
.. co
Q,}j
...
'"
o
u
'"
"
u
=
'"
i!:l
>,
~
on
'"
1U
ij
"
'"
.;;;
i!:l
"
;S
...
<E
o
o
0.
on
C
's
13
.~
'"
'"
"
'"
.;:
e
0.0
..,
.~ r-"
_VI
8~
'O'N"'
...
""fA
..
'"
co
U
-
...
..
....
..
.s~
~S
.. co
=E-
co _~
E-~
-
'" E
co co
Uu
'" ..
- -
.. ..
.;Q
... co
<...
0000011
OOMOM
OOr-ONI
lrlONlI"l N~
N V <lIT oe 0\'
N - v~
NN;i
fA ,,1
ltl
o
,
....
o
<=
N
....
<=
,
..,
g
N
..,
<=
,
S
..
N
N
<=
,
-
<=
..
N
-
<=
=
..
<=
N
fA
fA
>,
'" c
a 0
tn'';:
~g
.- .,
::'2 c 2
.0._ ...... _ tI:I
.- 13 -.,-
~ ",'~ g ~
~-<QUE-
c
o
.=
u
...
'"
"
>,
,
"
:-
""
'"
...
"
:-
o
00001
f"'iOOM
r-oor-
U"')"'OOI.f'l
00"'0
OCl\ClOV'l
-J
'is
'S
'"
is
o
o
-=
u
'"
'"
"
""
'2
::l
>,
~
OJ
>
'"
:;
u
"
E
~
"
;S
>,
or>
'"
"
~ '"
= 00
or> -
::
'e
fA
"
or>
-I-
Q
VJ
::l
~ r::
~~ 13
cu ~ ~
~cac:: _
~ ti UJ 5
'':''I (1) e
o 0 dJ dJ
o~~~
0_>'=
o. ~or>or>
.., .- E 13
_ Q...-.-
'" = "
fA U 0'1>::
.~
;.;
-
.,
o ;,;
u...
~ S
o<J~
0'0;
~ e
= ...
- =
= co
r..VJ
'is
"
.~
0.
" .
;stl
" 0
_ u
~ C
0.0
13 .~
8.'::
'"
S:e
~ 13
0'<:1
U '"
"....
;s ~
.... 0
0';:
'" fl'
... u
~ "
0"
'" "
-=
c-
.S! ;s
;:;: .~
13 .
015
c.c
0"
+- 0.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL AQUATIC FACILITY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of JulY 11. 2000 between the City of
Temecula Community Services District ("District") and RJM Desion GrouD ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and cond~ions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on Julv 11. 2000, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
December 31. 2001, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged
in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under
this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The District agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment
rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and
schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Two Hundred Ten Thouslllnd
and Ninetv-Four Dollars and NO Cents ($210.094) plus Twenty-One ThouSlIlnd Ten DolllllrIJ and
No/100 1$21,0101 as a 10% contingency for the total term of the Agreement unless additional
payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connectionwith its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein,
unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager.
Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as
agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time District's written authorization is given to
Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not
to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed
twenty -five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be
approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the District disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The District may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the District suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Distrid
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided
that the work performed is of value to the Distrid. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to
this Sedion, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Distrid pursuant to Section 4.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, District shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any
work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written
notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of
work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence
of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the District shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with resped tD
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by Distrid that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly idanti-
tied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of Distrid
or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give Distrid the right to
examine and audit said books and records, shall permit Distrid to make transcripts therefrom as
necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related
to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a
period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the District
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the Distrid without the permission of the
Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall
make available to the District, upon reasonable written request by the District, the necessary
computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing
computer files.
c. With respect to the .design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other
than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert
witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the District, its officers, agents and employees
may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or
damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out
of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the negligence of the District.
9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Uability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to
the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Uability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Uability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Uability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of Califomia;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure
a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the District, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the District, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-
insured maintained by the District, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided
to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured.
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, retum receipt requested,
has been given to the District.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the District. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coveraae. Consultant shall fumish the District with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by
a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District
before work commences. As an altemative to the District's forms, the Consultant's insurer may
provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting
the coverage required by these specifications.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the District a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of
Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither District
nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of
Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,
employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the District. Consultant
shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against District,
or bind District in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, District shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for District. District shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The
District, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure
of the Consultant to comply with this section.
12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without District's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attomey, voluntarily provide
declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives District notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify District should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. District retains the right,
but has no obligation, tD represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with District and to provide District with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However,
District's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by District to control,
direct, or rewrite said response.
13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To District:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
. Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
RJM Design Group
31591 Camino Capistrano
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Attention: Robert Mueting
14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the
District. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only Robert Muetino shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Robert Muetino may
use assistants, under his direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall provide District fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Robert MuetinQ
from Consultant's employ. Should he leave Consultant's employ, the District shall have the option
to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual
services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to
in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
16. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Consultant understand and agree that
the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigllltion
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party
against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by
the Court's judgement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the
relief granted.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into
this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
18. AUTHORITY TO E)(ECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeff Comerchero, President
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
RJM Desion Group
By:
Name: Robert Muetino
Title: Principal
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
IRJJM
]J) lE STI G N G]RO 1UJP9 TINe 0
PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
June 29, 2000
Mr. Herman D. Parker
Director of Community Services
City ofTemecula
43200 Business Park Drive
T emecula, CA. 92590
RE: Scope of Work and Fee Proposal for Temecula Aquatic Center
Located at Chaparral High School, 27215 Nicolas Road,
T emecula, California
Dear Mr. Parker:
As requested, we are submitting an outline of the scope of services and cost proposal for the City of
TemeculaAquatic Center, in joint partnership with the Temecula Valley Unified School District.
It is our understanding that the proposed aquatic facility will have the following goals, program and
direction:
1. The specific program requirements for the pool facilities and buildings are based on the
Master Plan dated June 12, 2000 including 25 yard X 25 meter competition pool, 33' x 75'
recreation pool with I meter diving board, and zero depth wet playground with 5-7 wet
play elements.
2. The design of the building shall follow the direction as established in the Schematic Floor
Plan and three-dimensional renderings dated June 12,2000.
3. The area of the pool building is approximately 2,650 s.f. and the area of the storage
building is approximately 600 s.f.
4. This project shall be processed through the Department of the State Architect (DSA), San
Diego office for all penuits.
5. This project will be constructed as one phase with a target base bid of$2.1 million and
alternate bid items to include spray pool area, and miscellaneous pool equipment.
6. Four (4) of the existing basketball courts will be impacted by the project. They will not be
replaced. Parking lot modifications, directional signage, and other off-site items are not
included.
Thank you again for the opportunity to continue working with you, Phyllis, the rest of your staff,
and the City of Temecula, on this important contribution to the community's recreational amenities.
With. egards,
RJM Desig
~
'--
R bert Mu
Principal
CORPORATE OFFICE. 31591 CAMINO CAPISTRANO' SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675' (949) 493-2600' FAX (949) 493-2690
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE' 985 LINCOLN WAY, SUITE 20M' AUBURN, CA 95603 . (530) 823-8370 . FAX (530) 823-8379
SCOPE OlF SEJRVliCES
PHASE II
TASK 1
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
The design development phase of our services shall be to prepare all preliminary plans and
cost analysis based upon the approved Master Plan dated June 12, 2000, in order to fix and
describe the scope and character of the entire Project, including landscape architectural,
architectural, aquatics, civil, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, materials and such
other elements as may be appropriate. Consideration shall be given to availability of
materials, equipment and labor, construction sequencing and scheduling, economic analysis of
construction, user safety and maintenance requirements, and energy conservation. Final
selection of materials, textures, and colors shall occur.
A. Provide aerial topography and field survey verification for base preparation.
B. Prepare final designs and plans relative to the site, aquatics, architectural,
structural, electrical, civil, and mechanical engineering associated to the proposed
project complete with site and building floor plans, exterior building elevations,
building cross sections, and aquatic facilities.
C. Prepare preliminary grading, drainage, water, sewer, gas, electrical utilities, and
access studies and utility coordination.
D. Perform earthwork take offs.
E. Prepare probable estimates of construction costs per square foot.
F. Provide sample board for materials color and finish.
G. Conduct staff meeting to review final design prior to construction drawings.
H. Conduct (2) Committee meetings as necessary to review final design prior to
construction drawings.
MEETINGS:
(1) City staff meeting and (2) Committee meetings.
PRODUCTS:
Refined preliminary plans, building elevations and sections,
refined cost analysis, defined mechanical and electrical systems,
color palettes and materials board, outline specifications of
dominant materials for the building, and cost estimate.
TASK 2
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
The final Construction Document Phase of the project consists ofthe preparation of the
construction documents to include final drawings, specifications, calculations, and final
M:/RJM/PROPOSAU2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecula Aquatic Center Phase II.doc
2
opinion of probable cost. Our proposal includes complete landscape, architectural and
engineering services required to execute the project. Specifically, we have included the
following disciplines.
A. Landscape Architectural/Site Development
I. Landscape ConstructionlDemolition Plan
2. Landscape Planting Plan
3. Landscape Irrigation Plan
4. Landscape Details/Specifications
5. Statement of Probable Construction Costs
B. Architectural
I. Title Sheet, Index and General Notes
2. Architectural Site Plan
3. Building Floor Plan at y." = 1'0" scale
4. Reflected Ceiling Plan
5. Exterior Elevations
6. Roof Plan
7. Building Sections
8. Door and Finish Schedules
9. Interior elevations of selected fixtures, walls and rooms
1 O. Architectural Details
C. Aquatic Facilities Design
I. Pool System Construction Drawings
a. Plan views in appropriate scale
b. Longitudinal and cross-sections
c. Finish details
2. Pool Structural Drawings
a. Structural sections
b. Reinforcement schedules
c. Miscellaneous structural details
3. Pool Mechanical Drawings
a. Underground piping plan
b. Mechanical equipment room piping plan, sections and details
c. Miscellaneous mechanical details
d. Piping schematics
4. Pool Electrical Drawings
a. Underwater lighting conduit/wiring plan
b. Single phase panel schedule(s)
c. Bonding details
d. Control circuitry schematics
5. Pool System Miscellaneous
a. Structural calculations
b. Final form technical specifications in CSI format
M:/RJM/PROPOSAU2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecula Aquatic Cenler Phase II.doc
3
D. Civil Engineering
1. Title Sheet/Details/Quantities
2. 20 Scale Precise Grading Plan
3. Field Survey Verification
4. Horizontal Control Plan
5. Relocation and Connection of On-Site Fire, Water, and Sewer
6. Process for Permit
E. Structural Engineering
1. Structural Calculations
2. Foundation Plans
3. Roof Framing Plans
4. Structural Details
F. Mechanical Engineering
1. Heating Plan for the office areas
2. Heating details and schedules
3. Title 24 calculations
Note: it is anticipated that there will be no air conditioning provided for this
building and heating will be provided only for the office areas.
G. Plumbing
I. Plumbing Floor Plans
2. Plumbing Fixture Schedules, Details and Specifications
H. Electrical Engineering
I. Electrical Power Plans
2. Lighting Plans
3. Panel Schedules, Notes and Details
4. Title 24 energy calculations
During this phase, the Contract Documents are prepared setting forth in detail the
requirements for the construction of the project. General conditions, instructions to bidders,
and all special requirements will be provided by the City, and when combined with the
various trade specifications, a complete project manual will be produced. Construction
drawings will be submitted at 50% complete for review, revised and submitted again at 90%
complete for review, revised, and finally 100% complete construction drawings will be
submitted for City and DSA review and approval. At each step of construction drawing
submittal, a revised cost estimate will also be submitted. Upon approval of construction
drawings, the consultant will provide the City with original reproducible tracings of the
approved construction drawings.
Note: Specifications shall be book format as part ofthe drawings for the materials connected
with this project. Instructions to bidders, general conditions etc. will be part of the
specifications provided by the City.
M:/RJMIPROPOSAL/2000PROIOOO-76 Temecula Aquatic Center Phase II.doc
4
TASK 3
BIDDING
Bidding Procedures
The Consultant shall assist the City with the Bidding Phase of the project. Questions,
clarifications, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process will be resolved by addenda
prepared by the Consultant. Addenda to the contract for construction shall be prepared in
writing to document any clarification or modification made to the contract documents. In
addition, the consultant shall attend a pre-bid conference, if required, and assist the City in
awarding the construction contracts.
TASK 4
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION/ADMINISTRATION
The Consultant Team shall conduct biweekly job site meetings for an anticipated 6 month
construction period to generally review and evaluate the construction schedule, monitor
weekly performance, review quality control standards, and provide assistance for any
clarification or revision to the contract for construction. A total of 13 site meetings shall be
included in this proposal on an as requested basis. Shop drawings and related submittals shall
be reviewed and returned to the consultant for appropriate action. The Contractor's requests
for information, proposal requests, and related communications shall be attended to on a
regular basis. Consultant will review change order requests by City staff, issue requests for
change orders to the contractor, review the contractors change orders and issue
recommendations to City staff for action. Contractor's pay requests shall be reviewed by the
Consultant on a monthly basis in accordance with the amount of work completed and in
accordance with the contract docwnents. At every job site meeting, minutes shall be
prepared, published and distributed by the Consultant to all parties concerned, specifically
noting current action items and related responsibilities.
Upon completion of the Construction Phase the Consultant shall organize and conduct a final
walk-through and review. A final punch list for all required corrections and remaining work
shall be prepared.
During the Construction Phase of the project, the following services shall be furnished:
Preconstruction Conference
A preconstruction conference shall be organized and conducted to brief all parties concerned
with general and special requirements of the contract for construction. Procedural matters,
routing of information, and project representatives shall be defined. Attendees shall include
representatives from the City's staff and School District, the Consultant, the Contractor, and
all major subcontractors.
Job Site Meetings
Bi-weekly job site meetings shall be scheduled and conducted by the Consultant for the same
day and time through the duration of the project. Scheduling, coordination, requests for
M:IRJM/PROPOSAL/2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecula Aquatic Center Phase ILdoc
5
Bi-weekly job site meetings shaIl be scheduled and conducted by the Consultant for the same
day and time through the duration of the project. Scheduling, coordination, requests for
information, and changes to the contract for construction are routinely monitored. The
consultant shaIl publish and distribute a field report for each job site meeting, documenting
the progress of construction and specificaIly noting current and delinquent action items.
Submittal and Shop Drawing Review
The Consultant shaIl review all required shop drawings and related submittals as required by
the contract documents.
Project Close-Out
At the completion of the Construction Phase a final job site meeting and review of the entire
facility shaIl be conducted. A final punch list wiIl be published and distributed by the
Consultant to all parties concerned, specificaIly noting required corrections, non-conforming
work, and work remaining to be completed. A second walk-through shaIl be conducted when
all punch list items have been corrected, at which time a Final Notice of Completion shall be
filed by the City.
Record Drawings
Consultant will review contractor submitted Record Drawings for contract conformance and
completeness based upon field observations made during the construction
observation/administration task and the original contract documents. Consultant shaIl not be
held responsible for inaccuracies of the contractor provided record drawings. Any site visits
required io verify information contained on the contractor's as-built drawings will be provided
on an hourly basis.
M:IRJMJPROPOSAL/2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecula Aqualic Center Phase II.doc
6
FEE PROPOSAL
It is the objective of our Design Team to provide the most comprehensive, yet efficient,
approach to the development of the T emecula Aquatic Center project. Fees for the work are
as follows:
Phase II
Task I
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Design Development
Construction Documents
Bidding
Construction Observation! Administration
$ 40,774.00
$120,593.00
$ 2,870.00
$ 30.857.00
Sub- Total
$195,094.00
Estimated Reimbursable Allowance:
$ 15,000.00
PHASE II TOTAL
$210,094.00
Reimbursable exoenses are in addition to the basic fee. Reimbursable expenses
will be compensated at cost plus handling and shall include the following
items:
A. All consultant reproduction
B. Printing, plotting, copying, one set of reproducible tracings,
photography, graphic expenses, fax, special delivery and handling of
documents, shipping. (Estimated allowance does not include printing of
construction documents for bidding purposes.)
Additional Services
The following items shall not be a part of the fee identified in the payment
section above, but shall be reimbursable to RJM Design Group, Inc.
A. Additional meetings and site visits beyond those identified as
authorized by the City ofTemecula.
B. Exhibit preparation beyond that identified in the Scope of Work.
C. Any change to the design development drawings after City approval
will be done in accordance with the attached standard hourly fee
schedule.
D. RJM Design Group, Inc. shall provide the necessary plan check
revisions requested by the City for two plan check reviews. All
M:/RJMJPROPOSAU2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecula Aquatic Center Phase II.doc
7
subsequent changes shall be done in accordance with the attached
Standard Hourly Fee Schedule.
E. If it is in the interest of the project to engage or retain the services of
any other consultants (graphic/sign designer, environmental engineer,
etc.), then upon Client's written authorization, RJM Design Group, Inc.
may engage or retain any such consultant, and the engagement of each
consultant shall be an expenditure reimbursable to RJM Design Group,
Inc., plus a 15% coordination fee.
F. A Geotechnical Investigation Report was not made available at time of
preparation of this proposal. Should the services of a geotechnical soils
engineer be required, the City shall select, retain, or engage such
consultant directly. Unusual soil conditions such as expansive soils, fill
soils, soils with low bearing capacity (under 2,000 pst), and high water
tables which require additional engineering will be considered an
additional service. Structural design services and fee are based upon
normal site conditions and conventional foundations.
G. The project architect will handle all building, mechanical and electrical
coordination with the DSA (San Diego office) to secure a building,
electrical, plumbing and mechanical permit. All other coordination,
except that needed for a building permit, such as public works, road
department, school district review, etc. shall be coordinated by the City
or shall be billed as additional services.
H. Plan Check and permit fees will be paid for by the City.
1. Acoustical engineering.
J. Asbestos containing materials investigations or surveys.
K. Renderings or models.
L. Preparation of as-built drawings.
M. Temporary power design/documentation.
N. Local Area Network system electronics, server equipment, computer
hardware and software.
O. Access control and CCTV security systems.
P. Construction survey/inspection, off site street improvements, any
special pollution control permitting (NDPES), land subdivision,
easements, separate water/sewer construction documents (water and
sewer to be shown on precise grading plan), or utility connections.
M:/RJM/PROPOSAU2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecu1a Aquatic Center Phase II.doc
8
Q. Onsite Hydrology Study or extensive analysis of the existing storm
drain system.
R Design and structural engineering for canopies over spectator bleachers.
S. Water auditing selVices.
M:/RJMIPROPOSAU2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecula Aquatic Center Phase II.doc
9
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT B
STANDARD HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
The Client agrees to pay Consultant as compensation for all authorized work included in the
Scope of Services heretofore stated, at the hourly rates below:
RJM Desil!n GrouD. Inc.
PRlNCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
ASSOCIATE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
CADD OPERATOR
DRAFTSPERSON
WORD PROCESSOR
$100. per hour
$90. per hour
$80. per hour
$55 - $70. per hour
$55. per hour
$45. per hour
James Mickartz. Architect
PRlNCIP AL ARCHITECT
ASSOCIATE ARCHITECT
$90. per hour
$75. per hour
Aauatic Desil!n GrouD
PRlNCIPAL
ASSOCIATE
CAD TECHNICIAN
DRAFTSPERSON
CLERICAL
$125. per hour
$100. per hour
$75. per hour
$50. per hour
$25. per hour
Creative Buildinl! Systems. Electrical
PROJECT ENGlNEER
DRAFTSPERSON
$85. per hour
$55. per hour
Davar & Associates. Mechanical
PRlNCIP AL ENGlNEER
PROJECT ENGlNEER
DRAFTING ENGlNEER
$95. per hour
$85. per hour
$70. per hour
Roessler Iliesil!n GrouD. Structural
PRlNCIPAL
PROJECT ENGlNEER
SENIOR ENGlNEER
ENGlNEER
SENIORDRAFIERlCAD COORDlNATOR
DRAFTER/CAD OPERATOR
$110. per hour
$90. per hour
$80. per hour
$62.50 per hour
$70. perhaur
$62.50 per hour
MCE CODsultants. Civil
PRlNCIPAL
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ENGlNEER
PROJECT SURVEYOR
DESIGN ENGlNEER
ASSOCIATE ENGlNEER
PROJECT ASSISTANT
3-MAN SURVEY CREW
2-MAN SURVEY CREW
$110. per hour
$90. per hour
$80. per hour
$75. per hour
$65. per hour
$50. per hour
$40. per hour
$190. per hour
$148. per hour
M:/RJM/PROPOSAU2000PRO/000-76 Temecula Aquatic Center Phase II.doc
10
Billings for all time and materials and contract extension work shall be in accordance with the
level of work performed and will be broken into the categories listed above.
Fee Escalation:
Fees will be escalated each August 1" in accordance with any increase in the Consumer's
Price Index or other mutually agreed upon cost index, beginning with August 1,2000.
All provisions for fee escalation pertain to all contract extensions and additional work.
M:/RJM/PROPOSAU2000PRO/OOO-76 Temecula Aquatic Center Phase II.doc
11
~TEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
Herman Parker, Director of Community servic~
FROM:
DATE:
July 11, 2000
SUBJECT:
Children's Museum Feasibility Study
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file the findings of the Children's Museum Feasibility
Study.
DISCUSSION: Over the past several months, staff has been working in conjunction
with Arthur Greenburg of AMS Planning and Research, to develop a feasibility study regarding the
development of a children's museum here in the City of Temecula. During the development of this
study, a steering committee was formed which consisted of Councilman Jeff Comerchero,
Councilman Ron Roberts, Community Services Commissioner Jack Henz, members of the
community, representatives from the Temecula Valley Unified School District and staff. Through a
series of workshops, focus groups, personal interviews, and intercept surveys, our consultant has
gathered the following information as to the feasibility of developing a children's museum here in
Temecula. Based on the information gathered, it would appear that a children's museum here in
Temecula, would be a successful endeavor.
Tonight, Mr. Arthur Greenburg of AMS Planning and Research, is here to present the findings of
the children's museum feasibility study.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the feasibility study was $33,000 and was budgeted for
in the FY 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Program.
I\TEMEC]Sl 01 \VOL 1 IDeptsICSD\ZIGLERGIREPORT'D711 00 BOD Children Museum.doc
8
~
C!J
~
~
~
~
a-.
~~
:g~
:aC1j
u~
eg~
~ o~
~~
eJ o~
8 ~
~~
~
"
.~
~
d
(j)
00 0
~ 0
~ 0
>===4 N
eQ
d ..0
~ ~
j;!>"O
~~
!=
<g ~
~w
Elo5l
19 Y
~ !=
19 ~
!= 19
tb ~
19
~
~
~
El
.=
El
El
~
=
tb
0)
~
~
,-..,
~
c..>
t':S
~
.-
c.. -
.- tIl
r=1 ..= tIl CI)
tIl .-
.... CI) .....
CI) c..> .-
~ bI) .... > tIl
(jJ) ~ .-
..... CI)
CI) r:: ~ r::
.-
~ - ~ bI) 0
.c r:: ~ .....
~ 0 .- tIl
.- tIl 5h tIl ....
r:: .- CI)
r:: r:: t':S -
~ =' CI) - r::
S 0 "d .a .- ....
.- .2 a c..> 0
s -s ,-.. r:: !a c..>
~ "d ::: tEl
0 c..> !a 0 - '-' ~
0 .- -
c..> fIl t':S .... "d
- a s CI) CI)
~ """ r:: r::
0 E ..... 21
~ CI) P.. tIl tIl
a r:: .... ~ bI) ~ r::
0 '"0 Q) =' CI)
E-< - r:: CI) >
.- .- bD .- - C1
..... ..= ,-.. ::: i 0 CI)
~ c..> '"0 c..> ,-.. "0 .- > .- -
CI) - ,-.. "0 Q) 0 t':S
tIl 0 .... - Q) ::: bD ..... bI) '"O~
- tIl .-
tn I .g CIl 1<i Q) .... r:: c..>
~ tIl r:: S .... P.. Q) .... 0 CI) CI)
tIl "0 ?Jl
(jJ) e .- - Q) 0 ~ .tl c..
Q) ..... 0 CIl P.. I ::: tIl
0 >. ;::l tIl bI)
08 ...... c..> tIl CI) ::: - C1 "d
i:; CI) e; .- I - >. CI) r::
> t':S .... '-' C ::: - CI) ~ CI) !a
CI) tn Q) -
Q) .s CI) ,-.. fIl .- ::: "d
..... Q) - bD () () '"
1:1 r:: tIl r:: <a ::: '-' e Q) CI) ..= C1 g
(jJ) .- .- ...... t:: c..>
0 "'0 .- S .t:: 0
~ '-' ;::l CI) tIl ~
- bI) ..... .a tIl fIl P.. () 1:: .... CI)
~ fIl () -
1:1 ..... r:: '"0 r:: '-' tn .- Q) '-' c.. =' ='
CI) 0 CI) 00 0 ~ 0 () fIl CIl r:: c.. c..>
S .tl CI) .- a Q) ::: ..= CI) .-
ro -s .... "0 0 c..> c.. l::
IS II tIl r:: Q) Q) CIl .... ~ =' > CI)
..... c..> - .... ~ ='
"d tn 0 ::: 0 S CIl S - ~
!a CI) 0 ro o - a - fIl tE c..>
- ~ 8 CIl CIl
c.S ..... E "d U "d tn p.. p.. tIl tIl B B
- CI) .- '"
.s =' ~ ~ CI) ~ CI) ~
--' .- "d
tIl Q) '"0 c..>
r:: r:: '"d =' CI) c..> CI) r::
~ 0 0 CI) ..= =' CI)
..... z .-
u U .....:l 0 V1 E-< V1 .....:l
~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0
..
.D.....
..............-.....",..............................................................
"-''''''''',-,',
...-.-.,......,.,-,.
. ' ",,-,,"
, .....,..
. .,-..
". ,'- ,'"
. _. .d'
'-' -" ,'- .
. ..
".. ,....-,..'. .
s:::
0
.-
00
II)
""'
II)
~ ..s:::
.....
0 ~ s:::
rg 0 .-
~ rIl
(J" II)
.J:l .....
~ .-
rIl rIl
.-
s::: ""'
.- II)
0 e -5
'"d rIl 0
0 < ..... rIl '"d
C,) II) II)
"==::/ '"d II) 0 .....
~ ''="l ~ .-
.D rIl
:::s .-
~ rIl C,) ;>
rIl -
""' 0 00
0 @
~ ;> s:::
(jJ .-
0 ~ ~
C,) - rIl
~ :::s 0 II) ..s:::---
'"d .E 0 e ~
~ ~ '"d
C,) ~
~ ~ e o ~
~ II)
..... tt:l :::s
~ s::: '"d .s rIl~
.g ~ ..0 ~
tI:l rIl s:::
.a .- II) o rIl
~ II) rIl ~ .- ~
;::::l c;I) C,) - ~ ~ s:::
0 " s::: ~ ""' ..... II)
II) ""' 00 :::s C,)-t3
'"" II) II)
0 ~ .- s::: ~ 0' 11)-
""' C,) .- rIl ~ 0.. .-
~ tI:l rIl e ..... ~..s:::
d II)
;::::l s::: ~ II)U
Q ;S .- '"d C,) II) ..s::: 0
(jJ " V'l ..... ~ 0 .. .!=P ~
rIl ""'
~ I II) ""' II)
;S rIl
08 ""' rIl ~ ..s::: ~ ..s::: .-
-.:j" II) ~ II) II)Q
> ~ ~
.- .;i 15 C,) II) II) ~ ~
S .- ~ 0.. C,)
~ .- ~
~ 00 c;I) 0 ..s:::c;I)
S s::: ~oh
..... 0
S II) .l:l
" ~ c;I) ~~
U 0 0
0
..........-....'.>............................,.......,................
.," ..........':.-:.,..
",,--:'::':',;:
.,',.,' ..:,- .
. ," ....
. "
. . ....
.' .....
.c.,...,...... .
~ E
0 d
~ @
(]'<. 00
1$ d
~
0 00
-
eJ ~
~ ..
"==/ E
"
"Q ..
..
r==1 "
= :3E
.=
~ ..
.c
(jJ) U E!
:!:!
(f.) 00 :c
~ u
"Q 0
...
~ ..
@ :l::
..
~ <0=' :;
.=
00
.=
~ ~
0 b 4,h ...
@ <l:-'"-
."'....":..-.
~ ~
@
g]
(jJ) ~
o~ .=
> ~
00 #.
(jJ) ~ 8
~ t:
0>
~
@
b
~
N
~
! ~
H~
~ cell'"
.a:;,,>
iH i
:E>>z
DDom
:ll
j
It:
e
..
J:
::Ii
2
u
c
m
It:
~~ ,:~~~~~i j~~~;~i;:j;~i<,L;:~~j;~j~~> ~,~:':: : ";: ~"~:~~ ~i:j~~~i:~~, ~J
..,
B
m
"C
e
"
m
.l!!
&
c
<
~
~
g
N
~
#.
o
CJ)
.- U
o CO
0):::
CO .CJ)
Q >
......
c en
ro 0
roE
II.......
.. ...
. .
. -', ..,.....;.-,,:..---.
. -,.",..:-,.:,.-.,,:.:.,-:,.;
.'.:.......................................::..-
....-.-.,.-.,... ....
..:;.'-,-,,,,.-;:...:',-:, --.-'
~ ~
0 (gi)
~ 0=
db
(]'<.
1$ ~
@
0 ~
eJ @)
"==/ IS
lSij
r==1 <:='J
@,
(jJ) @
~
(f.) lS
~ @
~ U
~ @)
~
~ <:='J
0 IS
@
~ ~
@/J
9il
(jJ) lS
o~ 0=
> <:='J
lSij
~ [Q'f:
=
lSij
~
@
IS
@,
@,
~
@
~
lQ)
6
@,,~
@,,@
@"""
@>>
.=
(Q)
~@
= ~
~lQ)~
'= 6 @
lQ) @" ~
~ @,,@
W;~
@
~
lQ)~
6 @
@,,@
@,,~
~
'II....:.
'. -',-,::---:.
',. . ,- >
....: '-'
. ., .. .
. ."_....."..-....:.:::.
::.,...:.:.:';"":'-':"::
.'__ ,,,....0....
._,............,-..--:,
.::cc.:-:;:;::'::',>.:-: ....:.,-
,- .'" --,' .:
;::..
~
::i
*' ~'"
fii D~
.t:.C!l>
1!:....
C!l
IE
o
U)
;::..
'0
~::.e
-8'"
IN
~1lO
C!l
>
~
(jJ)
(f.)
~
~
~
~
o
~
(jJ)
o~
>
~
@~
nd
"0 0
= @
g E
~~
~~
@ .=
~ E
@ d
<0='00
00 00
o d
U2
.5 00
001:
<0=' @
~ b
00"0
"0 ~
~~
&0
00 00
@<O='
b .00
~ .=
~
~
.= 0>
<0='
~-
-
~~
00 @
~~
*=' ~
.
-
-" .,:~~
o
~
(]'<.
1$
o
eJ
"==/
r==1
;::..
"i
~
::::i
=~
<l:(N
...
III
...
o
2::
~ ~
o m
~?'
II.......:.....'
.:- .-..;.::::;".
. ,.....
. ......-.
. . ,
" -.. .
, -.' .......,:,:.:..
. :-. :.:::.:::::>-:::::-),-:;:::>
............. ....................
,:,,:;<>(:<:-:':-:::;
_" n- .
.. .
~
o
-
b
00 00
@ ~
~O>
....... 0=
00 00
00 b
E ~
~ ~
~ @
eh~
-~
00<0='
~ ~
<0=' 0>
5 E
E ~
3;02
~ 02
00
~o=
00 E
~ @
@ ~
g]~
~ 00
~ E
000
os; 00
00
0<0='
@ 00
o ==;, 0>
e E
~=
00
<0='
oo~
O>~
~ ~
~
(]'<.
1$
o
eJ
"==/
r==1
(jJ)
(f.)
~
~
~
~
o
~
(jJ)
o~
>
(jJ)
~
r!
01
~
il:
..
l&.>ll
C:-::.
~
w
..
u
c
o
g
:;;:~
....
8....
l'l
c
o
d')c~:~
<i~- ~ 0-,,'1,
"1.~.. .." \
. ~9" _...'
". ,1l'lll>>'_~ it
'\lIJf'il.;........ ''I.
-""--, ~
#_~ ..>l,&....~,. _.'
~_.......- ~ "-"'.
d11~'r,~....I;; ,,~
~~~~;~;
"'t".",.~~ -.fo,--'
8'r'1&-"""t.
o ~." ;:..... ~
. - '~.,.~~.-
'-~'''':-~.;1
'~&.~:..~\;.:..
-. "':":;,..;s.' .1 I.
..i;'u_:::r~
~'~.;BJai:-
S'~'M'" '::..
..
III
~
..~
.....
.....
l'l
c
o
..
01
~
..
[~
:lw
E
i=
~
...
II..............................................
.. """"--- .
".. .....
:;,.:;::;:::!--,,;:-:;.
. ....,;.,::.::".,,:,
' c: .:::n~:?:(//-:..\
~
o
~
(]'<.
1$
o
eJ
"==/
r==1
(jJ)
(f.)
~
~
~
~
o
~
(jJ)
o~
>
~
'# '# ~ Gl
~ 0 0
~ c:
(jj l!! Gl
~ ~ ~
::J ::J
Ul 0 l!!
Ul
Gl 0 0
...J Z ~
0 0 III
~"'J~'';,--:'' ::r:-
;'1180-;.' .;-,.....:- .,~
'h< ,_.
'ft< -
'.... .
:'I;~O "'~~ ~........',~, _.".~-.J,.;?,..~ ;
. .....,'.
t.(....... .
~.....~..' ~...'
_ _ -..........:.;. .;.<-0...._<
~-....,"':'4".;-1'._..~
~~~---
_,i...~
_._ .o~
....
,'t' .~ :;
1> " "-~....;:_"
~
~
~"';"f~,~ . "._.-i.""'.1"-.~ "'.
'#
fil
'#
lil
'#
5l
'#
~
'#
~
.8-0
~ ~
b-
Um~
o c.. ~
c g-c..C
,i\ co 0
""C..c:.o:=;
:;$:......00
.R'ocog
~F..Q-
a;
~
Gl
-c
al
c: '# :J? '#
Gl 0
E It) N V
e .0 w cO
ll. ...... It) N
...
al
Gl
Z
C
al
l!!
<(
Cl
c: :J? :J? '#
'a D 0
D- o N 1IJ
0 c:::i 0) c:::i
.c N <0 ......
en
'iij
-
Gl
0::
c:
~ ";f. ';J!. ";f.
1-......00
-CWr--:r--:
o V'<t
II..........
,', ......:., .
. -.,....;.
. . .. .',
,:'--:::':,:,:,:,:>:.:,::,;:>,.,:,
':-".::::-:::'.::::::-'::.::-:..
...........................:.,.................
....--.--... ....
,-:,--..-,--,.., .
. .,
""
C!l
'g
c';!!.
~ :;)....
""N
0 0
~ N
~
(]'<. .
1$ .
.
~
0
0 .-
00
eJ 00
.-
"==/ S
r==1 -=g
(j)
(jJ) S
(f.) . <=l
~ ~
~ 0
(!) 0
~';!!.
~ ~ ""~
Cd 0
~ "'"
cQ ~
~ \!=1
c.S
0
~
~ ~
0
M
(jJ) ~
~
o~
> ~
(jJ) 0
~ ~
~
0
(j)
~
~
(j)
~
rJ)
Cd
~
C!J~
~iN
011",
~
,
,
,
-_... -4
,
>.- .f
<-'-' j.
. ~...~,
~"-'-'
~:';~~; ~-. ,i
.~,
""....--..lll.......... '''~
-..~04'...:..."'"
....~~~ ~.
t:'~""-'*'-_'-~
. -.i~;ij..#- - . ~
.. ..""""*1.1<......... .
. ,,_ :"u..;...~
. "~~__'~-<<i
'~":~2
~~
?-. .,
~:-, .f
~'''-'.''
. .
. '
- ,
~'1
~~~
,s'.~ .
o
<;;>~
~fi'l
fi'l<;;>
~
II'.....
. "".,.
:;. .c-,;.;::.::,.-_;;::-,.
. '.'
. -' .....,.
: .'-: '::::::::::,;-:::,:::',',::?
. "-,-'-" '---
......................................,.....
... ',..,. ,"
""'-'::"',:::. ,:
00
00
~
o I'='l
~
~
o I'='l
~
N
CI)
00
~
~
~
~
0<=1
2::1
~
El
@
~
(ijJ
~
El
@
~
~
~
=
@
~
@
~
El
~
@
8
@
El
@
@
El
~
~
o
o
o
o
'"
00
1
'="
l::::l
~
f==l
bl)"'ej
~&) .~ 0
~ 8 .s
~ bI) bI)
"'0 "'0 . S
'0 ~ :g
0....... .:::J
~ ....... ....
~ ro.o
~ E bl)
= tI.l .s
&) bl)-
~ .5 .~
~ ~ &)
.- - S
,.J:::i tI.l '"
~ ~ e
bI) - =
o = Co)
8 .g ~
(I) (I) "'0
-0 Co) d
tI.l ~ ro
"'= 0..
.9 ,J::l
9~
to-..
..... .
"Ejct::
(I) .
-0 0"'
_ tI.l
bI)
.s
tI.l
.......
~
~
-0
~
t
o
~~
tI.l -
tI.l
tI.l
'0
tI.l 0
.t::: I-<
.0 rb
~ ~
(I) bl)
.s ~
- .......
tI.l (I)
(I) :>
~ (I)
- Q
I
~
"'"'
bl)
o
"'"'
~
"'ej
a
tI.l
-
.......
tI.l
.......
:>
~
(I)
0..
(I)
"'"'
(I)
OJ.)
ro
S
o
Co)
=
(I)
o
- -
tI.l
(I)
I-<
(I)
-
.s
o
-
tI.l
-
.......
~
~
~
I
tI.l
(I)
OJ.)
ro
I-<
(I)
"'0
.......
o
.......
ro
=
o
.....
tI.l
tI.l
~
o
I-<
0..
.s
ro
-
Q)
~
I
g3
.....
.0
~
&)
bl)
.s
bl)
a
,.!':i
u
I
j
.s
~
00
o
o
o
'"
o
~
o
*"'
1=1
o
.....
tI.l
a
0..
~
(I)
I-<
c.8
a
.....
.-
.....
.0
.....
tI.l
tI.l
o
~
I
II..........
. ....
. ..
" '. .-.',..-.,....
.....".,,-...,.....
.'................................................
.....'-..,..,-..-.. ,.
","-''''.''-'''' '-'
., ,...... .
~
o
-=g
(l'>
-s
o
o
"==/
00
alI)
~
00;==:1
-=g
~
00;==:1
~
N
(l)
00
~
~
~
~
()
.-
~
$=l
(!)
@ ~
o~ 0
~ .-
~ ~
6 {J
@) tS
Eb
g:€
~ ~
.p.l
o <=l P+=l
l) ()
6 ~
~ ~
@ 8
o~ 00
~ ~
~ .~
~ .~ ~
@ ~ ,..,
@) (j) 8
~ 13 ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ .tJ
~ I
o
.p.l
~ ~
o 0
$=l~
~r:.f.l
~ ~ c.t:
() 0.""'"
.~ ~ ~
$=l (j) 00
(j) N $=l
~ .""'" (j)
() ~ .;!3
~ ~ ~
(j) ::s 'US
r:.f.l ~
~ 0 ~
e ~ rA'
~ ~ ijJ
.~ {J (j)
> cQ ~
?> 8 S s
(!) ~ r=I .""'"
~ ~ ~ ~
(j)'''' $=l
. ""'" '" r:.f.l (j)
[) ~ cQ P,
~ ] ~ ,~
~ E s ~
~'" (j){J
.'" '" :> $=l
,..d (j) r=I 0
o e ~;:a
u c55.s ~
I I
o:S
~ .~
(j) 00
00 (!)
~ b!)
e eg
r:.f.l~
'" .""'"
~r=I
(j) b!)
..t; ~
r=I ()
.""", $=l
~t:)
(,J ~
(!) () 00
~ ~ ij)
(!)
~ :> .p.lS
"'0 (!)
r=I'U
~ p\ r=I
o ..;:;: 0
~ 00 :>
r:.f.l r=I '"
r=I 00
~.""'" ~
cQ ~ (!)
.p.l ~
r:.f.l '" @
(j) (j) ~
:> (,J
.""'" 5 00'"
~ .""'" r=I
n $=l ()
""" (!) ()
~ ~~
~ (!) 00
I
II........
.,. ',",'.,-',
. '",",.
. ......
. .
. ',-,"
. .....
',' .... --.,--.';....;-'..
..,...',.--..........-.-..
....,,'.'.'...'..-...'..
.......................................
',.... "
.".,'......'... .-',-,
:',":::::,.".":' '.,
. . c' '.
~
o
-=g
(l'-.
~
a
Q
""=/
00
~
~
o~
-=g
~
o~
~
N
(l)
00
~
~
~
!t1
ro
-
00
(I)
:e: .5
.d~
rIl I
] ~
8~
Q) N
8'"0
~ ] a
@ r::: (I)
~ ~.8
~ l-< rIl<<:i"~
O<==ij" I-< ~ ....!.
~ ~ .~ @ '"3
~ 5 .> ';: ::
t3.[O ..p p... Q) ::.. I-<
~g ;::l,D~.8
~.-= 8 8 .9 ~
"-'---' 0 ~ on Q) 0... ;::
~ 6..808 sa
~ .- 0 >. (j) Q)
0.J (j).~.d::: .... .....
;;;.. ;> 0 d 1=': .:::;
1.~g~~.i8
~ooo..oQ)
~ (I) 'I"l~o ~ ~
6 rn N 00 Ir\ .!:1 ~
c:l rn
@OO 0 0 (1)0
~ U 0
~
0<==1 I I
~
o
~
(j)
rn 0...
5~ g-
..... "'Q 0..
rn ~ '"
rn (j) .
(I) u bl)
U~ .
= 0 ~
8 ~ rn
~&~
OM"
c:l '::" ~
I-< "',..:::;: _
o !:l cQ :::
~ " - '"0
r::: .- !:l (j)
.- ~ (I) _
'" l:: ""' =
5 rIl (j).o (j)
1-<8 ~g..~~
o _ t) o...~ 0..._
- r::: ._" :: ~
~ Q) 0 ~...d ~ (j):E
.!:: 8 cd <: rn '"0 d.......
o g."'d) r:::~...d 5~
~ - I-< 0 .......:s rn ~,
....... (..) _..-I An ....,
;> Q) .t: '-"J . l-<
I-< Q) rr.J f.3 Cd ~ c.S ~
en 0 .~ ] .5 ~ ~ 5
fl.; c!d ~ - d '"0 ""0 0..
c on I-< Q) .:::l " .- S
.9 ._= .~ 8 E S ~ (j)
-::: Q) r:::.- bl) '" ""' -
"" ~ .- Eo;' e rn ~"'O
O;::ll-!8t;;;l(j)
'" ~ '" ca .s ;:1 ~ a
~ ~ <: ~ ;:I 5 ~~
oooo~;;;..=u
<~~~
I I
II....
-.' --'..;.'.
. ....
. '..
. .. ........
. ...
',' .. '-',"-',",","-'-'
.. ...............
........'.-"-'..--."..-'.
. -......
...::....._._...........................i.....
.......,....., ,''':
.. .. .
.. ,... ,.. .
~
o
~
(]'\
~
eJ
Q)
'===/
00
eJ1JJ
~
o y=:l
~
~
o y=:l
~
N
eIJ
00
~
~
~
o
o
o
'"
\D V)
~ .~
M .t::
~ :-:::::
~ S
o '"0
~ 00 S
o I=l -:==' '"
6 00
~ 8 V) 8
s en1;} ~
€I) ~ 0 !::l
€::!> oF'! U E
01 ~ ~ .s
1=4 tI:l tI:l
~ (j) ...... ~
I=l ~ C!.) ~
oa 0 ~ ~
~ <==l \0 iii
~ ~ iii .-
6 -:=='
€I) 0 0 0
~~
gl
o
r=-..
"0
Q)
~
Q)
';f..
00
~
'"='
o
V)
iC""--
'"
iC""--
V)
r=I
~
~
o
00
(!.)
S
(j)
;;..-
~
'"0
(!.)
-:=='
o
(!.)
o '="l
o
1=4
~
I
o
o
o
'"
o
It'"--
r=I
~
2
~
o
~
(j)
S
(!.)
1=4
. F'!
V) ~
S tT
..... (j)
V) 1=4
V)
~ .&.5
~..s::: lZl
........ V) .F'!
- I-< ~
cd (j) 1=4
I-< .D ""0
g S ~
C?~~
<==l
~
!
~ ~
M ~
\0 .-
o
o
II....
. '"'','''
-. "','
. .....".
. ..
. ,'- .... ..,.,'.'.......".,.
":""::-";".:,:,::::;':;:
.. ........... >....... ..... >..
........,'........,. ,....:
.-:....:;.':". .
... .
Temecula Children's Museum
Projected Pro Fonna
~~~
Revenues
Admissions
School Fees
Memberships
Birthday Party Rentals (avg. 3/weekend, 40 weekends)
Gift Shop Sales
TotllI Earned Revenue
lEllpenses
OoeI1ltions
Personnel
Maintenance
General Administration Costs
Utilities
Subtotal, OpeI1ltions
Other Exoenses
Temporary Exhibits
Presented Programs
Exhibit Maintenance
Education Program Supplies
Birthday Party Supplies
Fundraising Costs
Shop Cost of Goods
Miscellaneous/Contingency
$100,000
12,000
22,500
15,000
8,250
$157,750
$183,580
$24,000
36,000
24,000
$267,580
$15,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$3,000
$12,500
3,300
IO,OOO
$58,800
TOTAL
OPERATING SHORTFALL
$326,3110
($1611,630)I
AMS Planning & Research
June 2000
I
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
~TEM 1
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APRIL 27, 2000
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to
order at 8:31 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Pratt, Naggar,
Stone, and Roberts
ABSENT:
o
AGENCY MEMBER:
None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 29, 2000;
1.2 Approve the minutes of March 21, 2000.
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item NO.1. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
Minules.RDAI042700
ADJOURNI1IlENT
At 8:31 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, May 9, 2000, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Ron Roberts, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.ROAI042700
2
~TEM 15
APPROVAL A
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA CE tBIL
CITY MANAGER tjtJ'
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Grant M. Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE: July 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Citizen Opinion Survey
PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Approve a contract in the amount of $20,345 to Godbe Research & Analysis to perform
a Citizen Opinion Survey
2. Provide staff with any additional input before Consultant begins developing survey
instrument
3. Appropriate $20,345 (which includes a 10% contingency fund) from the General Fund
Unallocated Reserves
BACKGROUND: As a component of the recently approved Growth Management Plan,
the City Council identified the need for a community survey. A similar survey was conducted
in 1997 which became very useful for the City Council to make decisions and provide a "road
map" for future planning purposes.
Staff sent out a Request for Qualification (RFQ) to 14 public and private research agencies and
received responses from nine companies. City Staff and Council member Comerchero
interviewed six of these research firms. While all firms were clearly qualified to conduct such
a project, it is staff's recommendation to award this contract to Godbe Research & Analysis
(GRA) which is a recognized leader in public opinion research.
Over the past ten years, GRA has conducted hundreds of citizen opinion surveys. Staff has
checked references on GRA and we feel confident they will do an outstanding job. The
process will include designing the survey instrument, conducting a 1 5-minute random digit dial
survey of 400 respondents (scientifically valid sample group) and finally presenting the results
to the City Council. Total cost for this service is $18,520. It is anticipated that the completed
survey will be presented to the City Council for review in late summer/early Fall of 2000.
Finally, attached to the staff report are the questions utilized to develop the 1997 survey. The
2000 survey will attempt to follow the 1997 survey in order to gauge the City's progress over time.
Once the 2000 survey questionnaire is developed, the City Council will receive a final copy of the
questions.
FISCAL IMPACT: To fund this project, staff requests an additional appropriation of $20,345
(which includes a 10% contingency fund) from the General Fund Unailocated Reserves into
account # 001-110-999-5248.
Attachment:
Contract
Godbe Research & Associates Research Proposal
Citizen Opinion Survey questions (1997)
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGREEMENT
FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 11, 2000, between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Godbe Research & Analysis ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 11, 2000, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
December 1, 2000, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall
complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and
to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting
its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT.
a. The City shall pay half of the fees for these services upon approval of the
questionnaire in the amount of $9,260.00 and the remaining half ($9,260.00) upon receipt of the
final report. This amount shall not exceed eighteen thousand five hundred twenty ($18,520.00)
for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this
Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein,
unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager.
Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as
agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to
Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work
not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be
approved by the City Council.
c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided
in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as
to all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to
Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
1
5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultanfs failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence
of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the
event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall h.lVe the
right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without
further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or
its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine
and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary,
and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period
of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys,
notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused
or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to
computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the
City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
2
c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not
be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location
other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which
the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent
or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.
9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City
nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or
any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement.
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees
or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur
or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any
manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
9 LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any
way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply
with this section.
10. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without
written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily
provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or
other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project
or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice
of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or
3
similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the
opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's
right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or
rewrite said response.
11. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City:
City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant:
Godbe Research & Analysis
110 West C Street
Suite 1300
San Diego, CA 92101-3900
4
12. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this
Agreement, only Godbe Research & Analysis. shall perform the services described in this
Agreement. Godbe Research & Analysis. may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to
perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14)
days' notice prior to the departure of assistants from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave
Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within
three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's
sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date
of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the
Consultant.
13. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
14. GOVERNING LAW, The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of Califomia shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govem the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this
Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and
reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior
or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written,
are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering
into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's
own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
16, AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
5
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Godbe Research & Analysis.
By
6
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
SCOPE OF WORK
Citizen Opinion Survey
I. Scope of Project
The following is the general outline of the work plan that the City is expecting from the selected
consultant:
A. Develop Survey Methodology and Sample: Based on the survey work plan, the project
outline in this RFP, and direction from City staff, the consultant will develop and present
a specific recommendation for survey methodology and sample.
B. Develop Survey Instrument: Along with the development of method and sample, the
consultant will prepare the questionnaire to be used by the survey. The draft questionnaire
will be reviewed by a committee, and the consultant will modify it as necessary to meet
the goals of the project while conforming with professional research practices. This
includes steps such as pre-testing the questionnaire and providing information about the
reliability of survey data for policy making.
C. Conduct Survey: The consultant will coordinate the interviews and assure that the sample
is random, accurately reflects community diversity, and is corrected for non-response and
other factors affecting survey bias.
Prepare Analysis and Report: Following the fieldwork, the consult will tabulate and analyze
the response, prepare a report with recommendations, and present findings to the City Council
in a formal presentation. In addition, consultant shall provide the City with hard-copies of
report as well as a copy in a digital format for future use.
7
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
The City shall pay half of the fees for these services upon approval of the questionnaire in the
amount of $9,260.00 and the remaining half ($9,260.00) upon receipt of the final report. This
amount shall not exceed eighteen thousand five hundred twenty ($18,520.00) for the total term
of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
8
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Ull .etJ1'",
qp~~,
Q,3~Q
~,
~"IlI1OllIllAesearch&Analysis
@@@[Q)(~~~~~~r~~ & A~~~V~~~
W@@@(ID[J@[}o [J)[f@[J)@@([]O
Prepared for the City of Temecula
May 2000
115SoutbtaMllollighway
Suite1AAAuilding0
Hall Moon Aay CA94019-173A
phone 650 711-313J
laI650711-3131
445SouthfigueroaStreet
Suite 1600
losAngelestA900J11631
phooe113614-AA63
lax 113614-8864
1I0WestCStreet
Suite 13110
San Diego CA911m900
phone 619134-34111
la1619134.9901
\~wl.godberesearch.com
o
Table of Contents
o
o
'ITaJIbDcp) em\} ~em[J\]\lcp)[J\]\llO'\
o
Table of Contents ................................ ............. .................... ............................................................................. ........ ..... i
About Godbe Research & Analysis................ .................. .......................................................................................... .... I
Project plan and Methodology............................. .............................................. .......................................................... 2
Project Time Line.......................................... .................. .......... ... .......................................................................... ....... 6
Consultant Fee ........ .............................................. ..... ............................ ............. .................................... .......... ............ 7
Firm Information............................................................................. ............................ ................................................ 8
Personnel Biographies................... ............... ............................................................................. .................. ............... 10
Client List...................................................... ............................ ........ ............................ .............................................. 15
References..................................................... .................. .......... ... .................. ............................................................. 18
Appendix A: Guide to Statistical Significance ............................................................................................................19
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
10
o
cgl]~~
cr;.~..
'~1
City ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Pagei
o
l5=.J~Research&Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0 ~
<,"i:J1
0 a;;...Do~ResearchiAnall,i,
About Godbe Research & Analysis
&IID@(J[]~ @@ciJlID<e OO<e~<ea:Ilj'@1ln ~ &OllaJO'\7~D~
Godbe Research & Analysis (GRA) is a full-service public opinion research agency that offers
its clients extensive experience in public opinion research for community needs assessments,
strategic planning, ballot measure feasibility studies, political campaigns, public education
projects, corporate image campaigns, jury selection and marketing efforts, The !irm's Prin-
cipal Researcher has been employed by candidate and ballot measure campaigns, as well as
by public and private sector clients, throughout the state of California and in Alaska, British
Columbia, Colorado, Idaho, Ontario, Oregon and Washington, His expertise spans 19 years
in the field of public opinion research, Complementing the Principal Researcher's efforts is a
Research Director and a staff of Senior Research Analysts, Research Analysts, Research Asso-
ciates, and Statisticians,
Over the past 10 years, GRA has conducted hundreds of voter and community opinion polls,
many of which specifically addressed resident opinions about the variety of municipal ser-
vices offered by our client cities, In the past three years alone, GRA has conducted dozens of
municipal service opinion research projects, including projects for the cities of Campbell,
Cerritos, Clayton, Davis, Fremont, Half Moon Bay, La Canada Flintridge, Lake Forest, Santa
Monica, and Watsonville, Through survey research, GRA is able to identify residents' opin-
ions about the quality of each service provided, determine the priorities for service improve-
ments, as well as develop a matrix which can be used to determine the optimal distribution
of resources among the variety of services offered, Our client cities use our research to better
understand their residents' opinions, identify service areas that receive high satisfaction rat-
ings as well as those that are candidates for service improvements, generate specific sugges-
tions for improving services, measure and track internal performance, and aid the
development of strategic plans that reflect the opinions of all residents.
As many of the capital and service improvements identi!ied by residents require additional
revenue, our staff is also highly skilled at designing survey instruments to assess baseline
support for a revenue measure, detennining the arguments and features of a measure that
increase support for the measure, assessing whether there is a need for a public infonnation
campaign and the substantive content of the campaign, as well as identifying the tax thresh-
old at which the necessary number of voters will support the measure. Collectively, these
capabilities allow GRA to determine the best way to package a measure for success, including
ballot language, campaign content and election timing. One testimony to our firm's contri-
bution to revenue measure campaigns is that we have an 83 percent success rate for all reve-
nue related ballot measures (including general obligation bond measures, parcel tax
measures, sales tax measures and Mello Roos measures) that we have been involved with in
California.
City of7lmuxula
GOObe Researcb & Analysis
Pagel
o
Project Plan and Methodology
o
o
LV[j'@DcP;~~ LVDam\l aJD'ilcdJ [j()l]cP;~Ilu@cdJ@D@@'\'7
o
GRA is a recognized leader in public opinion research. The firm believes that a project's suc-
cess depends on recognizing the individuals needs of each client. To this end, GRA has
crafted the following project plan for the City of Temecula to illustrate the types of consider-
ations that go into each of our research projects.
o
o
Research Ohjectil!es
Before beginning any research project, GRA spends significant time reviewing the client's
research objectives to choose the most appropriate research design. Based on the Request for
Proposals (RFP), GRA understands that the City of Temecula has several research objectives,
with the most important being to:
o gather unbiased, representative data on residents' opinions to be incorporated into the
strategic planning process;
o identify City services that residents value most;
o evaluate residents' satisfaction with City programs, services, and departments;
o identify needs that may be priorities for City attention in the near future;
o assess residents' support for City funding of additional programs and services and
o gather additional attitudinal, demographic and behavioral information to profile City
residents.
o
o
o
o
o
o
Sample "ze
GRNs approach to any quantitative research project includes rigorous attention to research
methodology. The first step in this process is to determine the appropriate sample size to
meet a client's research objectives, reduce the sampling error to an acceptable level and con-
form to the client's budget.
o
o
To survey a local community such as a city, county or special jurisdiction, a sample of 400
respondents is generally satisfactory. With the estimated number of adult residents in the
City of Temecula totalling approximately 33,000, a sample of this size will allow for analysis
of important subgroups and will reduce the overall maximum statistical margin of error to
between three and five percent (see Appendix A; page 19).
o
o
Sampling Method
GRA can work with a variety of different types of sampling methodologies including random
digit samples, random cluster samples, or a sample of a special universe appropriate to a cli-
ents' research objectives. For this community opinion research, GRA recommends drawing a
random digit dial (RDD) sample of area residents. This type of sample accurately identifies
potential participants for the telephone survey by their residency status and is most appropri-
ate when it is necessary to sample the attitudes of an entire population, and not just regis-
tered voters.
o
o
o
o
'1
(1.:~
"......J.iI "
~.
Ctly ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 2
o
lSolii:ll3Hesearch& Analyris
o
Project Plan and Methodology
o
o
Given that the City ofTemecula has expressed an interest in assessing citizens' and attitudes,
perceptions and needs, GRA recommends using an RDD sample. Because all households
with telephones have an equal probability of being chosen for the sUlvey, we can confidently
extrapolate the information gained in the sample to the larger population. Thus, the City of
Temecula would be armed with stable and representative data on which to base planning
decisions.
o
o
o
The RDD sample is drawn by determining the active phone exchanges within a given sam-
pling area (typically by zip code) and then producing a random list of all active residential
phone numbers in the area. Although this method produces both listed and unlisted phone
numbers and thereby eliminates the bias of unlisted phone numbers, it cannot match
names with each number. The respondent's name, address and other demographic informa-
tion, however, are easily acquired during the actual telephone interview.
o
o
o
One concern associated with a RDD sample is the City's incidence rate--the probability that
a given number will connect to a person who is eligible to take the survey. Because phone
exchanges are distributed according to several factors in addition to geography, certain
exchanges will service households both within and outside of the sampling area of interest.
The probability that a number will service a household within the sampling area of interest
is the primary factor that determines the incidence rate. As the overall incident rate for active
phone exchanges in the City decreases, the number of attempts that must be made to attain
the desired sample size of Temecula residents increases. The result of this is an increase in
the costs associated with the sample and telephone interviewing as well as the total time
required to complete the desired number of interviews.
o
o
o
o
For the majority of GRA:s municipal clients, the incidence rate tends to be between 70 and 80
percentUsing a reliable data base from which RDD samples are drawn, GRA has determined
that the active phone exchanges for the City of Temecula collectively have an incidence rate
of approximately 80 percent.
o
o
SurtJey Instrument
To capture a detailed "picture" of residents' opinions on the various issues and needs, GRA
estimates that it will take approximately 15 minutes to administer each interview. Special
care will be taken to ensure the methodological structure of the survey is comparable to any
prior studies that may have been conducted for the City of Temecula.
o
o
Surv!?)' Pretest
After a draft of the survey has been finalized, the document will be pretested at the data col-
lection facility on contract for the project. GRA pretests all of our interviewing projects to
ensure the document can be read to respondents in the time budgeted; the words, phrases
and subject matter are easily understood by the respondents; the answer categories match
what the respondents want to say and the document achieves the research objectives identi-
fied at the onset of the project.
o
o
o
'1
(.f~...
~
CiJy ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 3
o
<5cc!1kAesearth&Analysis
o
Project plan and Methodology
o
o
Data Col/ection
Currently, telephone interviewing is considered to be the state-of-the-art in public opinion
data collection. GRA will employ Flagship Research, a research phone bank located in San
Diego, which has an outstanding reputation for speed and accuracy. GRA has worked with
this firm on dozens of municipal survey projects and has an excellent relationship with its
management team.
o
o
Once the pretest results have been integrated into the final instrument, it will be sent to the
data collection facility to be programmed into a computer-assisted telephone interviewing
system (CAT!). While CATI programming takes several days to complete before the data col-
lection can begin, its benefits far outweigh the costs associated with its implementation in
the data collection process. These benefits include: automatically routing the interviewer
through the interview to ensure skip-patterns are properly navigated, allowing the entry of
only legal codes in any particular field which prevents many data entry errors, and assisting
supervisorial tasks by ensuring that the appropriate number of call-backs are made at the
specified times. Once the CAT! programming has been completed, data collection will take
approximately one we€k to complete.
o
o
o
o
o
Data Processing
GRA's Senior Research Analysts and Research Analysts personally process the data for each
project they conduct, thereby ensuring a level of detail and quality control not possible
through subcontracting data processing services. Once the interviewing is completed, each
response is coded, keypunched and detailed cross-tabulations are produced. The cross-tabu-
lations generally include age, gender, ethnic group, income, home ownership, parental sta-
tus, number of children and geographic breakdowns, as well as other banner points based
on attitudinal data. Once the data is collected, the sample characteristics are compared to
those of the population to ensure that the data are representative. If disparities exist (which
may arise simply by statistical chance or through known limitations of a sampling design),
GRA's staff are experts in 'weighting' the data to adjust for these disparities and ensure that
the results are representative of the entire population of interest.
o
o
o
o
Final Report
Analysis of the data and presentation of the findings is the last component of any research
project. Because a concise summary of the data and actionable recommendations are criti-
cal to a client's objectives, GRA takes great care analyzing the data and preparing a written
final report. GRA's final reports are the most thorough and insightful in the industry. The
report includes information about the methodology used to complete the project, an execu-
tive summary of important findings, conclusions and recommendations, a question-by-
question summary of the data and a complete set of crosstabulations.
o
o
o
o
One of the most important and practical features of GRA's report is the inclusion of a Satis-
faction-Importance matrix. Since our municipal clients have limited resources, it is gener-
ally not possible to satisfy all residents regarding all services. By acquiring measures of the
importance of a service as well as a measures of satisfaction with the City's efforts to provide
that service, GRA is able to examine the relationship between these two measures and deter-
o
o
('l1~.~
~
City ofTemecufa
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 4
o
($_[)~BeseaICh&AnaJysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'1
0 ~
~\~~~'
0 cmcoJ~Re~earch&^nalysi5
Project plan and Methodology
mine the areas where the City has the greatest opportunity, as well as the greatest need, to
improve its services. More specifically, the Satisfaction-Importance matrix identifies services
that should be maintained at their current level, services where 'improvement' should be the
focus and services the City may consider to be of lower priority, if resources are limited.
GRA produces a report written in clear and simple English, and designs it to be read by those
with little or no experience with statistics. GRA will also prepare an oral presentation for the
City and will remain available to answer any questions about the research findings in the
future. Unlike many of our competitors, we take pride in not practicing "hit and run"
research projects for our clients. That is, we will be here for your questions and concerns
about the findings of your research whether it's next month or next year. Moreover, this ser-
vice is provided without additional consulting fees.
City ofTemecula
Godbe Researcb & Analysis
Page5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
[]
0
0
0
0
0
0 ~
,~.~
0 C5cc:1J1lGResearch & Analysis
Project Time Line
[JJ[j'@D<F:~ti 'O'OOlJ[}<F: [),OIlTI<F:
Because of our experience conducting public opinion polls for a wide variety of clients from
cities and school districts to political campaigns, law firms, high-tech manufacturers and
non-profit organizations, GRA can generally conduct an entire survey project in about eight
weeks. In some situations, preliminary data can be available much sooner as deadlines
require. The table below shows a general breakdown of the tasks and an example time line to
complete the project. GRA will be happy to work with the City of Temecula to develop a time
line that meets the City's needs.
'iTilItbne "il. "iJ'DllDIle [Jjtl1le
Task
Initial Client Meeting
Questionnaire Drafting
First Questionnaire Draft Delivery
Client Review of Questionnaire
Questionnaire Revisions
Questionnaire Pretest
Finalize Questionnaire
CATi Programming
Interviewing
Data Processing
Topline Data Delivery
Report Writing
Delivery of Report
Presentation of Findings
Proposed Dale(s)
May 22
May 23 through May 26
May 29
May 29 through June 5
June 6 through June 8
June 9
June 12 through June 13
June 13 through June 16
June i7 through June 25
June 26 through July 2
June 27
July 31hroughJuly 17
July i9
July 25
City ofTemlXula
Godbe Researcb & Analysis
Page 6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'1
0 ~
'~1
0 ($~t:mGRe~earch&Analysis
Consultant Fee
~@rnllO'l[l!JDtiallJl)ti [f<El<El
GRA takes great pride in delivering usable research projects on time and on budget. Depend-
ing on a client's needs, the data collected in the fashion discussed in the preceding pages can
be used to provide information critical to an understanding of a community's attitudes and
needs, which aids in the development of a successful strategic plan.
GRA recommends that the City of Temecula conduct a IS-minute RDD survey comprised of
400 respondents. We have outlined the costs associated with this option, as well as a 12-
minute survey. The prices below reflect a firm, fixed-fee to complete the entire project--the
overall cost will not exceed those shown below, provided that parameters (survey length,
sample size and incidence rate) of the project confonn to those proposed below. The cost for
the RDD survey reflects an 80 percent incidence rate. If the incidence rate falls below 80 per-
cent, the cost for the Random Sample and Telephone Interviewing will increase accord-
ingly. The Research Fee includes all costs associated with questionnaire development, report
writing, and a final presentation.
Half of the fee for these services is due upon client approval of the questionnaire, and half
due upon the receipt of the final report.
l1al>O.. 2. (CDe~ lie1li",ates Ill! = <ll@@1
Task
Random Sample
CAT! Programming
Pretest
Telephone Interviewing
Data Processing
Research Fee
Miscellaneous Expenses
Total
12-minute
$600.00
$635.00
$225.00
$8,000.00
$800.00
$7,000.00
$250.00
$17,510.00
IS-minute
$600.00
$800.00
$22500
$8775.00
$87000
$7,000.00
$25000
$18,520.00
City ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 7
o
Finn Information
o
o
[foU'OTIl) D01J{)@U'OTIl)al~O@01J
o
ImcaScalllU'e1i1l $carmc<ccas
o
GRA relies on research as a primary tool to define and evaluate public opinion and assist
with the development of effective communications strategies and strategic plans for all its
clients, The finn has considerable experience in both qualitative and quantitative research
techniques, The following qualitative and quantitative research services are provided by GRA
to the finn's clients in the areas of community surveys, political polling, public policy, adver-
tising, media research and jury selection:
o
o
o
Baseline Polling
Baseline polling analyzes the current trends in a given community that are likely to drive
public opinion, The method is particularly helpful for governments, corporations or political
candidates who are interested in testing their approval in the community while gauging the
community's pulse on a variety of relevant issues,
o
o
Threshold Polling
Threshold analysis is frequently used to assess public approval of changes in service, tax or
fee levels, The process involves careful testing of different option levels and then 'pushes'
these initial tests by offering further infonnation to respondents to see if the respondents will
change their opinions, The 'push' reveals both the strength of the opinions and the room
available for future persuasion through public relations efforts, GRA has conducted a num-
ber of successful threshold surveys for cities, school districts, counties and special districts,
o
o
o
Tracking Polls
Tracking polls take place after a baseline poll establishes a level of support or opposition to
various messages, The tracking polls that follow a baseline survey allow for a refinement of
the messages first tested in the baseline and also allow for the analysis of opinions over dif-
ferent periods in time, Refinement of messages, especially for ballot propositions, is often
needed to make marginally supported messages into messages that meet with success, In
addition, by looking at survey data over time, the stability of a message can be assessed--a
key consideration for messages that may be affected by current events,
o
o
o
Focus Groups
This qualitative research techriique offers a unique opportunity to analyze the detailed opin-
ions of select groups of individuals, The format allows for considerable interaction between
participants and permits in-depth discussion of themes and ideas which are brought out in
the course of the discussion, GRA's experience in the field of focus group research includes
projects for government agencies, corporations, public utilities and political campaigns,
o
o
ExecutilJe Interviews
Before entering into lengthy survey research projects or costly public relations campaigns,
executive interviews are often cost-effective ways of understanding key aspects of an issue,
Interviews offer the opportunity to conduct in-depth discussions with community leaders
o
o
~T]",~
D"~
r:~;~:$'
City ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 8
o
(liica!l[lx)Research&Analysis
o
Firm Information
o
o
and policy experts on topics where the client must make a decision in the absence of per-
sonal expertise. Recently, the City of Cerritos utilized executive interviews to develop a con-
ceptual map of important issues and services in the community upon which future research
would be based.
o
o
Intercept Interviews
Occasionally the best way to obtain information on the opinions of a given group of people is
to conduct the research in-person where the target group may cluster. Shopping-mall inter-
cept interviewing is one popular example of this technique. In this example, intercepts are
one way of assessing the opinions of consumers on a number of products. Intercept inter-
viewing is also successful when government agencies want to assess customer satisfaction of
a given service such as public transportation. Most recently, GRA has conducted intercept
interviews for Bay Are Rapid Transit to assess its drivers' and passengers' opinions of the bus
services.
o
o
o
o
Mail Surlleys
Mail surveys are recommended under three unique conditions: (I) a client has a modest
research budget, (2) it is preferable to give potential respondents time to think about their
answers in private and (3) when there is time available to offer respondents a sufficient
period to answer the survey questions and collect aggregate responses. During the research
process, GRA employs a number of techniques to ensure adequate response rates. In the
Moorpark Unified School District, for example, GRA designed and distributed a survey to par-
ents in the district and received a 70 percent response rate.
o
o
o
Internet Surveys
The Internet offers a technologically advanced method for collecting data from a highly
select group of survey respondents. Internet surveys are recommended when the project
needs to be done quickly, there is a need for future tracking of the respondents, the client has
a modest research budget, and the population of interest has access to the Internet. Based on
our extensive experience conducting research, GRA staff has developed strategic methodolo-
gies that enable our clients to reap the rewards, while successfully avoiding the potential pit-
falls of Internet research. Most recently, GRA conducted international Internet research
projects for Hewlett-Packard, Agilent Technologies and PE Biosystems.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(l],1l~
~~.
City of'kmeculo
Godbe Researcb & Analysis
Page9
o
l$co:JiJOlGResearch&Analvsis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Principal Researcher
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1']
0 ((~
~,~"t:~'~
0 lScaClJ:xJBBsearch& Analuis
Personnel Biographies
[JJ~[j'~@lJ1]lJ1]~O [IDii@\ID[j'aJ[plllTIii~~
GRA employs a 'team' approach to each of our survey research projects. The firm's Research
Director, Dr. Timothy McLarney will serve as the project manager. In this capacity he will
oversee all phases of the quantitative project. A Senior Research Analyst and a Research Ana-
lyst will complete the team for this project. The Senior Research Analyst will be responsible
for the sampling design of the quantitative project as well as questionnaire drafting and will
serve as the day-to-day contact for City of Temecula staff. The Research Analyst will coordi-
nate and supervise all services provided by subcontractors.
1Bl1l171111l1l <Gi4llIl!lIh><SI. ruJ.Lii.
Cofounder of GRA, Mr. Godbe has over 19 years of experience in public opinion research,
public relations and government affairs. Mr. Godbe is directly responsible for all of GRA's
public opinion research including both qualitative and quantitative research projects, focus
groups, baseline polling and tracking projects. He is directly responsible for research design,
questionnaire development, overseeing data collection and data processing, analysis of
results and the presentation of findings. In this capacity, he has conducted both public opin-
ion and market research projects at the national, state, and local levels including projects in
and for Los Angeles, Marin, Riverside, Sacramento, SanJoaquin, San Mateo and Santa Clara
Counties; the cities of Cupertino, Lathrop, Livermore, Mill Valley and Thrlock, the Hewlett-
Packard Company (Boise, ID; Cupertino, CA; Corvallis, OR; Fort Collins, CO; Kitchener,
Ontario; Richmond, British Columbia; Roseville, CA; Santa Rosa, CA; and Vancouver, WA),
Hosie, Wes, McLaughlin & Sacks (juneau, AK), Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern
California Edison, the Building Industry Association, the Contra Costa Water District, the
East Bay Municipal Utility District and the Southern California Association of Governments
as well as for dozens of cities, school districts, and special districts.
Mr. Godbe received a Silver Anvil Award from the Public Relations Society of America for the
development and implementation of an outstanding government affairs program on behalf
of the Contra Costa Water District. This program was based on Mr. Godbe's extensive research
including baseline research, focus groups and three tracking polls.
Prior to founding the firm, Mr. Godbe was Vice President of Research at a California based
public relations firm. Mr. Godbe also serves as the Senior Research Consultant at the Center
for the Study of Los Angeles, at Loyola-Marymount University. He has a Masters Degree from
the University of Michigan where he studied survey research methodology at the Institute for
Social Research; and a BA degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
City ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 10
o
Personnel Biographies
o
o
ReseardJ Director
'ITiiDOD<ll>UIln17 1illiI1C[!.a~Il1lCBlll. IPIIn.lID.
o
As the Research Director for Godbe Research & Analysis, Dr. McLarney is responsible for the
design and oversight of GRA's diverse research projects, including those that address market
research, ballot measure feasibility, public policy, customer satisfaction and strategic plan-
ning issues. Dr. McLarney has extensive experience analyzing both the determinants and the
effects of public opinion, mass policy preferences and electoral vote choice. His work to date
has provided dozens of California cities, counties, special jurisdictions, transportation plan-
ning agencies, councils of government, school districts, corporations, and political cam-
paigns with research to address their often complex marketing, planning ancVor policy
needs.
o
o
o
o
Prior to joining GRA, Dr. McLarney worked as a Management Consultant for Quest Consult-
ing and Training Corporation in Monterey, California, a firm that provides organizational
development and training systems to clients such as PE Applied Biosystems, Toshiba, NEC,
Baskin Robbins and the Pebble Beach Company. Dr. McLarney has also spent time working
with the Regional Alliance for Progressive Policy, the Monterey County Sheriff's Office Crime
Lab, and between 1997 and 1999 was honored as a Visiting Scholar at the Institute of Gov-
ernmental Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
o
o
o
Dr. McLarney holds a M.A. and ph.D. in Government from Cornell University, as well as a
bachelor's degree in politics from the University of California, Santa Cruz. His academic
training and dissertation research focused on public opinion, public policy and mass politi-
cal behavior, with an emphasis on advanced statistical techniques, sampling design and sur-
vey methodology. Dr. McLamey has presented his research findings at numerous national
conferences and occasionally lectures on research methodology.
o
o
Senior Research Analyst
.futm17 1?1I<ll>!Jl1CBlIl'S. IPIIn.lID.
o
o
Dr. Flowers has developed research methodologies to accommodate a wide range of client
objectives, using focus groups, interviewing and survey research methods. She has extensive
experience in the field of jury research, including mock trials, jury selection, case theme
development and witness preparation. Dr. Flowers is currently working on resident satisfac-
tion projects for the cities of Atascadero and La Canada Flintridge, in addition to a survey
examining the level of awareness of environmental issues, particularly stormwater pollu-
tion, among residents of Contra Costa County.
o
o
o
Before joining GRA, Dr. Flowers served as a Research Consultant to Forensic Technologies
International, and was Director of Research for Mattson & Sherrod, Inc. in IDs Angeles. She
has taught sociology and criminology at California State polytechnic University at Pomona
and the University of Southern California.
o
o
(T]i!~. .
~
City of7/mUK;ula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Pagel!
o
$c<<J~Research&Analysis
o
Personnel Biographies
o
o
Dr. Flowers holds a Ph.D. in sociology from the University of Southern California and a
Bachelor's degree from the University of California at Berkeley. Her academic research has
focused on communications technology and popular culture. She has published a book and
several related articles on technologically mediated communication.
o
o
Senior Research Analyst
IXllllODlll G'OIl1l<a, ruJ.&..
o
Ms. Fine develops many of GRA's corporate market research projects, including recent
projects for Hewlett Packard and Agilent Technologies, Microsoft, Bidcom.com and Lucent
Technologies. To this end, she leads GRA's research team through questionnaire develop-
ment, data analysis and sample design. With an understanding of the psychological dynam-
ics that underlie survey responses, she is a valuable addition to our firm.
o
o
o
Ms. Fine is also skilled in a number of cutting-edge research techniques, including Internet
surveys and advertorial copy testing. Her most recent project for Hewlett Packard required the
survey instrument be made available in four languages and across multiple channels. Her
research provided the company with information to assist their internal communications
staff during the transition from Hewlett Packard to Agilent Technologies.
o
o
Ms. Fine has an extensive background in research, research methodology and advanced sta-
tistical techniques. Prior to joining GRA, she conducted research at four universities and in
two countries. She received her BA in psychology from the University of California, Santa
Barbara and her M.A in Social Psychology from New York University. Her primary academic
interests included decision making, attitudes, group dynamics, cultural differences, social
cognition, and statistics. Her specific research projects included research on cultural differ-
ences in self-concepts, and information-seeking strategies.
o
o
o
Senior Research Analyst
IJUOCClilllllIroll $lllD'il<aS,IiMiI.$.
o
Mr. Sarles has comprehensive experience in experimental research design and quantitative
and qualitative data analyses. At GRA, he is responsible for proposal and report writing, sam-
ple and questionnaire design as well as data processing. His experience with a wide variety of
clients includes work for local and regional government agencies, corporate clients and
non-profit organizations. Mr. Sarles' most recent clients include the cities of Davis and San
Jose, the Silicon Valley Library System and the San Francisco Unified School District.
o
o
Prior to joining GRA, Mr. Sarles received his B.S. in Psychology from the Illinois State Uni-
versity, graduating with summa cum laude honors. He also received his M.S. in Experimen-
tal Psychology from Illinois State University with magna cum laude honors. Mr. Sarles'
Master's thesis was recently presented at the annual conference for Applied Psychological
Sciences. His primary academic interests included interpersonal communication, social-sex-
o
o
o
'1
('t:l~..
~~9'
<S=<lI:1!>38esearch& Analy,j,
CiIy ofTemecu/o
Godoo Research & Analysis
Page 12
o
o
Personnel Biographies
o
o
ual behavior, and sociobiology. Specifically, Mr. Sarles specialized in research concerning
sexual harassment at the organizational, situational, and intrapersonallevel.
o
Research Analyst
m6<e1JI1l.6.[;lli].&>.
o
o
Mr. Li has comprehensive training in all phases of survey research methodology, including
sampling design, questionnaire development and quantitative data analysis. At GRA, he is
responsible for ensuring collection of high quality data for the firm's research projects. He
also assists GRA's staff in questionnaire design, data analysis and report writing. His exten-
sive experience with media and public opinion research makes him a valuable addition to
GRA's research team. Mr. Li has currently assisted the finn's senior staff with research
projects for Kings County, Latino Issues Forum, Redwood City Elementary School District
and the Hueneme Elementary School District.
o
o
o
Prior to joining GRA, Mr. Li worked for MetaResearch in Sacramento on customer satisfac-
tion evaluation surveys. Mr. Li received his MA in the research-oriented Journalism pro-
gram from The Ohio State University concentrating on public opinion research and studying
media effects. There he participated in several public opinion research projects and assisted
in teaching research methods courses. His research interests include quantitative research
methodology, advanced statistics, pre-election polling evaluation techniques, and new
media technologies. A long time resident of China, he is also fluent in Chinese and sensitive
to the cultural subtleties of conducting research in the Asian community.
o
o
o
Research Analyst
C!116at IPDuatDIllIlll. ruiJ.&>.
o
Ms. Phelan assists GRA's staff with proposal writing, data collection and data processing. Ms.
Phelan has assisted in questionnaire development, data analysis and sample design for a
wide variety of clients. Her experience with municipal clients includes work for the City of
Manhattan Beach, the City of Fremont, the City of Malibu and the City ofWatsonville. Ms.
Phelan has also worked for a host of special district clients, including the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority, the San Mateo County Economic Development Association and the
Stanislaus County Library Trust. Additionally, she has worked with the Novato Unified School
District, Placer Union High School District and Red Bluff Joint Union High School District.
o
o
o
o
Ms. Phelan comes to GRA with an extensive background in political science and research.
Prior to joining GRA, she received her BA in Political Science from the University of Arizona
and her MA in American Politics from Claremont Graduate University. Her primary aca-
demic interests included political behavior, public policy and criminal justice. Specifically,
Ms. Phelan specialized in research concerning women in the political process and the deter-
minants of interest group formation.
o
D
Statistical Analyst
C@
~\\(_At
J](]at~liI>at~ [;lli]atIlil61lll111. IPDu.IID.
o
City ofTemecula
Goetbe Rl!1iearch & Analysis
Page 13
o
IiicmlncoAesearch&Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Research Associate
0
0
0
Personnel Biographies
Dr. Herbert Medina works out of GRA's Los Angeles office where he occasionally provides sta-
tistical and methodological support. Dr. Medina is a tenure-track Assistant Professor of
Mathematics at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. Dr. Medina received Doctorate
and Masters degrees in Mathematics from the University of California at Berkeley and a
Bachelors degree in Mathematics and Computer Science from the University of California at
Los Angeles.
Dr. Medina is well versed in a number of complex statistical techniques and optimization
analysis techniques. He has been published in such academic journals as the Michigan
Mathematics Journal (Unitary Operators Arising from Irrational Rotations on the Circle
Group) and the IllinoisJournal of Mathematics (Connections Between Additive Cocydes and .
Bishop Operators). Dr. Medina recently published a paper for the American Mathematical
Society on Functions That Are Trivial Cocycles for a Set of Irrationals.
Dr. Medina serves on the board of directors for the Central American Resource Center and he
is a member of the American Mathematical Society (AMS) and the Society for the Advance-
ment of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS).
~CIt~DUilllDUaIJ<l>> COiWlClt~~illl. IPIIn.IID.
Dr. Guerra serves as a Research Associate in GRA's Los Angeles office. Dr. Guerra serves in
that capacity as an on-site supervisor of GRA's Southern California projects. He also assists
GRA with projects involving outreach to the Latino communities in each project area. Dr.
Guerra conducts executive interviews, focus groups and other research appropriate to under-
standing and soliciting the opinions of the Latino community.
o
Dr. Guerra is a Professor at Loyola Marymount University and Director of the University's
Center for the Study of Los Angeles. Dr. Guerra recently completed work with Mr. Godbe on
the following projects: public opinion surveys for the Montebello Unified School District, the
County of Los Angeles, the Southern California Association of Governments, the Charles Cal-
deron for Attorney General Campaign, the Latino Issues Forum and the Los Angeles County
Library.
o
o
Dr. Guerra is the founder and director of the Mexico Program at Loyola for intensive Spanish
study and he is the principle director of a major $600,000 Irvine Foundation Grant to build a
multi-cultural environment at the University. Dr. Guerra received his Masters and Doctorate
degrees from the University of Michigan in political science with a focus on quantitative
research.
o
o
o
o
'1
('~
'-W
City ofTemecula
Goetbe Research & Anatysis
Page t4
o
I5no.x.Rese",ch & Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0 ~
,\'L~~.,J,'
0 cmcC!ll~GResearch&Analvsjs
Client List
([;DiicsllTI~ [1,ih~~
The following listings represent a portion of the municipal districts, county districts, library
districts, special districts, school districts, non-profit organization clients, transportation
planning clients, corporate clients, and candidate clients for which Mr. Godbe has conducted
public opinion research projects.
WiJIlCIlllDa:DlJllallD ~DcsllllRz
City of Alhambra
City of Boulder
City of Campbell*
CityofCerritos*
City of Clayton
City of Cuperlino.
CityofCypre:;s*
City of Davis+
City of Fontana
CityofFremanl
City of Gilroy
City of Lake Forest+
City of Lathrop
City of Livermore
City ofLU'i Angeles
CityofMaHbu.
CltyofManhatLanBeach
CityofMHIValley
CityofMiIlbrae+
City of Mode;to
CityofMoulltaln\lew"
CityofNovato.
City of Pomona
City of Rocklin
City of San Bruno+
City of San Anselmo
City of San Lorenzo
City of San Ramon
CityofSanJlR
CityofSanlaClara
CityofSanlaMonica+
CilyofSouthLakeTahoe+
CityofSouthPas~na
CityofThrlock
CityofThstill
CityofWatsonville
City ClfWoOOland
TownofAlherton
Town of Los Galos
~Gl>IlCIlllll17. OoCIIDD'all1117 &1, $lJllsa:CallD IIDcsRIl'iia:R ~DcsllllRs
A1amooa County Llbrarif5
BayAreaLibrarySystem
ContraCo:;taCounty
Contra Co:;ta Water District-
EaslBayMunicipalUlilityDlstrict
fresno County Librarif':S
Los Angeles County Depl. of PubHc Works
Los Angeles County Public Library Foundalion
Marin County Free Library
Marin County Public Works Department
~lidpeninsulaRegionalOpenSpaceDislricl
Monlerey County Public Library
Rancho Simi Recrealion & Park District
Riverside Public Library
Sacramento Public Library"
Sail Diego Association of Governments-
Sail Luis Obispo Council ofGovemmenlS
San joaquin County Library Districl
San Jose Public Library
San Maleo County Park & Recreation Dept.
SantaBarbaraCountyAssoclationofGO\Iemments
SantaClaraCountyLibraryDislrict
Santa Clara Collnty Urban Prevenlion Program
&otts Valley Fire Protection District
Silicon \'JlleyLibrary System
Solano County Libraries
Sonoma County
SOllth Coast Air Quality Management Districl
San Mateo County Park & Recreation Dept.
Stanislaus County Library
Tri-County Apartment Msociatlon
City ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0 ~
<"'('1
0 ($H~e3R8Search&Analysis
ClienlLisl
$clln<ll><Il>D IIDD..{brDc~~D6"1l1l~"
Cabrillo Unified School District
Center UnifiooSchool District
College Elementary $choolDistricl
Davis]oint Unifjal School District
Dixie Elementary School District
East Side Union High School District
Fremont Unified School Distrlcl
Geyservllle Unified School Districl
Huenerne Elementary School DlSlrict
Kentfleld Elementary School District
Laguna salada Unifitrl &hool District
Lagunitas Elementary School Districl
Larkspur Elementary School District
Loyola Marymount UnivelSity
Martinek unified School District
Mill Valley School Districl
Montebello UnifiooSchool District
MoorparkUnifiedSchoo[District*
Novato Unified School District *
P[acer Union High School District
Roo Bluff Union ElemenlarySchool District
Ralwoo:I City School District*
RossValleySchoolDistriCl
San Francisco unified School District
San Mateo Best Schools Committee
San~iateoCountyCommunityCollegeDistrict
San Rafael Elementary School District
San Rafael High School District
Sierrajoint Community College Districl
Tamalpais unified School District
TehachapiUnifiedSchoolDistrict
Thrlock High School District
University of California
CallforniaSlateUni\l€rsities
Windsor unified School District
Woodside Elementary School District
~<Il>Il1l-IP.<Il>{ffi~ ~DD"Il1l~"
Bay Area Calholic Homes
California Apartment AWJCiation
Catholic HeaJthcareWest
Center For The Study of Los Angeles
Friends of the Santa Monica Library
Friends of the Saratoga Library
LatlnoIssuesForum*
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce
San FrallciscoCommitteeonjobs
San Francisco VISitors & Con\l€ntion Bureau
San Mateo County Sheriffs Association
Silicon Valley Council of Nonproflts
Santa Monica Youth Athletic Foundatton
StanjSlall~CountyEconomicDevelopment
Sonoma County lklanl of Realtors
Southem Alameda County lklanlof Realtors
SbJdents for EducationaJ OpporbJnity
Walnut Creek Chamber of Commerce
jewish NationaJ Fund
Martinez RegionaJ Land Trust
Riverside County Deputy SherilIsAssociation
Resources For The Future
'iTh'iIlll1l"IJll<ll>Il'Illn~D<Il>1l1l IPDiIlll1lll1lDll1lmJ ~DD"Il1l~"
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)*
ccs Planning and Engineering
Federal HighwayAdministraLioll
Foothill Traruill*
FremoAreaExpress (FAY.:)
Los AngelesWorJd Airports
Marin County Public Works
SonomaH"')'.101 CorridorActionCmte.
Metropolitan Traru..portationAssociation
Metropolitan Traru.-portation Commission
Parsons,Brinkerhoff,Quacle&Douglas
Read Communicati0ru/7lO Freeway Coalition
Regional Transit
Resources for the Future
Roaring Fork Transit Agency
San Francisco International Airport
San Mateo Transit District (SamTra.ru;)*
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency (VfA) "
So. CaJiforniaAir Quality Management Dst.
Soulhem CalifomiaAssociation of Governments
StanisiausAreaAssociaLionofGovemments
StateofCalifomiaAirResourceslklaro
Transportation Management and Design
Transporteslntercalifomias
City ofJemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LJ
0
'1
0 ~
"X4
0 cm=ctlrmonesearch & Anal~si~
ClientUst
Cl::zDllaIJaaIJzUClll Cl::UacaDllIls
RichaniAlalorre (14thCityCouncilDistric~LC\'iAnge[es
Leo Bazile (7th Cily Council District, Oakland)
Ruben Barrales (4th Supervisorial District, San MateoCnty)
HalBl'OIOTl(SlateofCalifomia,lnsuranceCommissloner)
Charles Calderon (State of Ca!ifomia, AtlomeyGeneral)
Don Freilas (Sth Supervisorial Dlstrict, Contra Costa Cnty)
Mary Griffin (1st Supervisorial District, San Mateo Cnty)
Barbara HeJler (6th As.semblyDistricl)
cr::CIl>~IJllCll>~ZUClll cr::UacaDllUz
AgilentTechnologles
Applied Malerials
AT&T Broadband and IntemetServices
Bank of America
Bidcom.com"
Cargill Salt Corporation
CJ. Seger.;lrom& Sons
Del MOl1teCorporallon
Hey:lett-PackardCompany"
InrelCorporalion
Lucent TechJl(llogies
Hosie, Wes, McLaughlin & sacks
McCutchen, Doy[e,Brov.n& Enersen
Media & Associale5
Microsoft Corporation"
*Repeat GRA Clients
Mike Hemandez Ost City Council DistriCI, Los Angeles)
Tom Huening (2nd Supervisorial Distrlc~ San Mateo Cnty)
Don Horsley (San Mateo CntySheriff)
Kenjone:s (Cabri!loUnifledSchool District)
John Latimer (71h A\sembly District)
Bill Mahar (5th Congressional Dlslrict)
ShannonReeve:s (Mayor, City of Oakland)
pacific Gas & Eleclric Company
Perkin.ElmerCorporallon
Rentals.com
San DeigoGas & Electric Company
Santa Fe pacific Realty
Sequoiaksociale:s
Shapelllndustrie:s
SouthemCalifomiaEdison
Stevens/Garland
SummerHill Homes
TCI Cablevislon of Cali fomi a
The Sierra Group
WhltecHffHomes,Inc
WinningResults,Inc.
City ofTemecula
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page 17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
'1
0 ~
.....:'._-
""..1#
",1.-_
0 liiH!2IxilHesearch & Analysis
References
OOcP)(JcP)I?cP)[]!]<rilcP)~
~cllW CIl>U ~<auIl'iiUCIl>S
Projects: Resident Satisfaction Survey
Executive Interviews of Community Leaders
Focus Groups of Residents
Business Owners Satisfaction Survey
Annie Luger
562/926-1320
Contact:
Phone:
@CIlW CIl>U o..,c,<a "CIl>....sft
Projects: Resident Satisfaction Survey
Business Owners Satisfaction Survey
Focus Groups of Residents
Tracking Survey
Lake Forest Annex Survey
Lake Forest Recreation Follow-up Report
David Bass
949/461-343
Contact:
Phone:
~cllW CIl>U 0.., ~alDnal<lilal "DCDnUIl'ii<lil!!ll<a
Project: Resident Satisfaction Survey
Contact: Deborah Orlik
Phone: 8181790-8880
@cllW CIl>U $alDnl!.;n IilliICIl>DnCCal
Projects: Ballot Measure Survey Regarding Proposed Assessment
Resident Satisfaction Survey
Telecommunications Survey
Judy Rambeau
310/458-8721
Contacts:
Phone:
@cllW CIl>U @llIIlJD<arrlliiDnCll>
Projects: Resident Satisfaction Survey
Cable Franchise Survey
Ballot Measure Survey Regarding Open Space Purchase
Ballot Measure Survey Regarding Proposed Library Construction
Don Brown
650/252-4505
Contact:
Phone:
City ofTemecuUl
Godbe Research & Analysis
PagelS
0
Appendix A: Guide 10 Statistical Significance
0
0 &C0C0~mH~Dn &~ @(l[]DclJ~ \l@ ~\l~\lD$\lD~~D
~D@[J[lD{lD~~[J[l~~
0 The table below shows the possible sampling variation that applies to a percentage result
reported from aprobability type sample. If a 400 participant sample is drawn from the adult
0 population of Temecula, the margin of error due to sampling will vary between 2.92 percent
and 4.87 percent. The chances are 95 in 100 that a sUlVey result does not vary, plus or minus,
D by more than the indicated number of percentage points from the result that would have
been obtained if the intelViews had been conducted with all persons in the universe (33,000
adult residents) represented in the sample.
D '[j'aOla,,:ll. $llalmslmcaO $ill"illiica"c"
D I Distribution of Responses
N 190%/10% 80% I 20% 70% I 30% 60% I 40% 50% I 50%
D 1000 1,83% 2.44% 2.80% 2.99% 3.05%
900 1.93% 2.58% 2.95% 3.16% 3.22%
800 2.05% 2.74% 3.14% 3.35% 3:42%
D 700 2.20% 2.93% 3.36% 3.59% 3.66%
600 2.38% 3.17% 3.63% 3.88% 3.96%
D 500 2.61% 3.48% 3.99% 4.26% 4.35%
400 2.92% 3.90% 4.46% 4.77% 4.87%
300 3.38% 4.51% 5.16% 5.52% 5.63%
0 200 4.15% 5.53% 6.33% 6.77% 6.91%
100 5.87% 7.83% 8.97% 9.59% 9.79%
D 50 8.31% 11.08% 12.69% 13.57% 13.85%
D
0
0
D
D
D
~
.,'~ City ofTemecula
''C Godbe Research & Analysis
<5c<1l>GResearch & Analysis Page 19
<>
o
o
I
I
l
j
Attachment
I
I
I
I
~ rern! r(J)!P 7rlEblfillE((;{Jj/!",#1
(Q)Wu~u~~ CGuUO~@[[lJ ~l!1Jfr1'l7@W
Your city of T emecula wants your input on important City Issues and servlces. We'd IIka you 10 fill OUllhe following
"repon cail:f' 10 help us better learn about the level of services you bsfoeve the City Is providing, What kind 01 city you
want T emecula 10 bacome, and what your visws at\9 on key issU9S, programa, activiIias, and por<l:ies.
When you're asked to .grade. something, give a grade of either an .A", "8', "C", "0" Of on "F." Just like in school, you
know that an "A" gradG is the best and an "P' is the = You'll b3 asked 10 fill In blanks with your views and 10 rate
II1ings from most important to least We know you will help us by giving your very bast ideas, thoughts, ond input
Please anS>ller every qusstJon, ~ possible.
- -
THiS QUDCK SURVEY TAKES ABOUT 12 MINDJTES TO COMPLIETE. BEGIN NOW
- .11 - indicate the nsmo of the strGet you rIVO on end 1113 closest cross _ You don'l hevo 10 provic13
~ your _I add""", or ""ilia (unlosll you <mnt to). .
=1!Jli@
""""'" of slre3l you live on,
Closest cross streat:
2 Which 01 the lollcmlng describes yaw Il!lSIdsnco. "lllvo in- " Chedt one of the folkmif!g
D House or condominklm that I own o Apartmentlduplexlor a multi-family hoUlllng place
o House or condominium Ihat I rent o Other ,
3 CItolcll your age group:
0 Under 20 years old 0 21-30 yaars old 0 31-40 yaars old o 41.50 years aid
0 51 -60 years old 0 61-70 yeaIS old 0 71 + yaars aid
I@;l!ii 41 Whalla the one thing you reaDy lI!to _ your rl3igh--.r1
\'I&!JiJ
~ What You Uke:
c;@:;lj)
5 _'s the ono thing you feel ROOds impl'OVClll8llt or clllmging to me~ II botlort
What Needs Improvement
a Looking just 81 the neighborhood "'....... you live, grodo lIIo llht\pol tItaso things ",.. In.
Just circle the letter grade you 0'Jant fa girm !2!1il! Ihlng.
The roads and SlrNlS A B C 0 F
The amounl of tr8lfic 811d its flow A B C 0 F
The yards and lawns around here A B C 0 F
Tl'lISI<, junk cars. rdlor A B C 0 F
He.. places look (painted, fixed up) A B C 0 F
And ff your neighborhood has th_, please answer. If nor, 90 10 next quBSIion...
The ~aJks A B C 0 F
Streellighlll A B C 0 F
Cwbs, gutters, drainsge A B C 0 F
r
I
I
I
1991>-97City01 T""""""" ClllzGnOpiniDn SUtYoy 2
'1
- "1 Tell US .,bout public safoty issues In your 1l3igh~
ii"~
~ VeJY -..oy Sonw.WI'U Very
IJ!I!!ffl
~ Chsd<aboxforJ!i!!Jl._ Safe Solo U""",o IJrDate
ll:@!lj) a a a a
OVerall, how safe do you feel in your noigllborhood?
How safe do you feel walking around at night? a a a a
How safe do you feel oulside during lha day? a a a 0
How safe do you feel inside your home? a a 0 0
Nota So..~ Smltl Big
Problem A Probl<m I'nlb:;m -
Gangs and gang activity in !he neighbo.loQOd atea a a a a
Drug use and actM1y in the area a a a a
Public drinkinglinloxioalion in the area a a 0 0
Unsupervised juvenile delinquents in 1he neighborhood 0 a a 0
Graffiti around 1he neighborhood area a a a a
Thefts or burglaries in the area 0 0 0 0
Assaults and orimes that hurt people physically 0 0 0 0
Whet.grucle do you givo ",,_ CiIc#I e grntb for cedr allhe foIIDwIng_
. Response time getting throygh to 911 (If you've had to) A B C D F
Response time for police arriving (W you've ever called them) A B C D F
Attitude and professionalism 01 City of Temecula police A B C D F
Overall, the quality and job that City police do A B C D F ;
Response time for lire dept arriving (If yOu've ever called them) A B C D F
Attitude and professionalism of City of fire personnel A B C 0 F
Overall, 1he quality and job that City fire pelSOf1nel do A B C 0 f
\'@!Jl) 8 What Is the one thing you really liko obout.your City 01 Temecula?
-
~ What You Uke:
@lijl7@1jl
-
-
/illl!)_ S. What Is tho one thing you feel needs improvemGflt or changing 10 IMlto Ii ba\IeI'?
. What Needs Improvement:
10 What livable city """,Id you IIko Ihe CIty of Temecula 10 Ix> modeled llflEt. and ""'V?
City To Be Uke: Why:
.
11 City of Temecula depertm3nls kovo olroody done 0 '1>1 01 worn on """"', tIl:llntarcllongoo, ottroctlng
sI10pplng centers, pam, and Installing signals in onlor 10 respond 10 cllfzen noocls llIld rcqulIS1s. What
are the next three major things you suggsll1 tho City Council and city dop<:nmontll """'" tholr 1Imo on?
1.
2-
3.
i
I
'I
t!/9S097 Cily 0/ Tem:cuIa CiIizcn 0pin!Dn Survl>y 3
."
- 12 Give your city a gracle 101 oac:h oIlho foIIotJIng ibmn.
~@DJ Circle a grade for each of",.. fD/fcmng items
1jlII1l@:2l)!
@>~ The physical layout of !he City^>henl things ate IocaIed A B C 0 F
@iN!
The qualily, look and appelltllllCe 01 buiIdings.& 1aa1lties A B C 0 F
The look, quality, design, and placement 01 shopping cenlets A B C 0 F
The sile & _ 01 building and SIOtlI signs A B C 0 F
The ease in getting around using bike paths and sldewalI<s A B C 0 F
Some cities feature museul1m, porIo....I..g orin c:ent<lr.l, culluml <:8IItGro, Iaga IIbn!rIos, end SO on. Tell
13 .... 11_ ""'~o sense lor Tem:lCukJ '" _ ~
.
Potenllal nlW1 itom: ~o sonso llt _ tim3? II v~, _ '" prlorIty fer thla:(cin:ko ono)
. Perfottning Ans Cooter OY CN high medium row
Cullutal AIls Center cv CN high medium loot
Museums CV CN high medium loot
Large Cily Main Ubraty CY DN. high medium low
What do you thln~ about the City Clel>tfng 0 public bU$ sytllem _ ""uld handla _ IMming In the
1~ morning and afternoon end ..hlch t:1ould servo SO tho Cily'o publIc trnnsponation aymtem II>::> nJSl ollho
time?
o Grestldea o Bad Idea Why?
,'",
,.
IJ!l!IjI 15 The City off"",. range 01 recreation end community services (Including perlul, art cfoosos, crolla,.
~ dancing classes, exercise c:laases, yoUlll ca_ Hull actIviti<ls, soniof _ __, chad care
@IlI@iii'I
_.~ . --- -r.ofOlTllll,.-cri4!c-intGrvontjo_"'-networklng-with-~oio.l ~.:."uiit) and'Cm'pIU~nRml ultk;ea, Gte).
Iilllj) Circle a grade
-
~ Overall. what grade do you give lhe City lor its paIks. _ & <:orrlIllIlOity_? A B C 0 F
Why this gracle?
Tho grade you give for its paIks. recreal!onICllII1Illl,I1jl _IllS, 1taiIs, b:lle pa1hs, &lc.? A B C 0 F
Why this grada?
16 In a typical yur, ho.. allan does your "'mily """ "","",lfonlcommunily ~ OI.01tOnd city
recreational activities?
0 Never/rarely 0 1-3_ 0 4-6_ 0 7.9 times 0 10+ times
'i7 00 you _ Attend Christmas par_ Dy ON Attend 4th 01 July Parade Oy ON
VIllitOldTown Ov ON
18 Which city rec:reallonlcommunlty serv!l:<llI mld tttiYilies do you consider to be vsry Importllnt ami that
the City should make sura Its keops end c:on_ to ollar?
1. 2.
3. 4.
'998-97 City 01 T_ Cit/z8n Op!n!on 8urwy 4
I
.1
l@ll1 "ile TIlinldng about tho entire City of Ten=ulo:
~~
~ Grsde lID rosds and public <IOffuJ...
~Ii@;)
!l:<I;@li\'I The sidewalks of the City A 8 C D F
W StrMI rights in the City A 8 C D F
~
Curbs, gutlefS, drainege overall A 8 C D F
The amount 01 tzaffic and lis fkM A 8 C D F
GnHls /Is level at public _Iy_
How safe you feel in the City overall . A 8 C D F
Altitude and.professionalism of CIIy of Temscula police A 8 C D F
Overall, the quality and job tho< City par_ do - A B C D F
Altitude and prolessionaUsm of CIIy lite personnel A 8 C D F
Overall, the quality and job thai City lite panlOnnel dtl A 8 C D F
-.
Grado lIS ovenlR quB/ity of life-
Overall grada to the City for lis quality of life A 8 C D F
Overall grade to the City as a grsal pIaca to five A 8 C D F
Overall grada to the City as a great placa to wolk A B C D F
()varall grade to the CIIy as a place to have a businaas A B C D F
Overall grade to City empioyaes lor their ...rkiassislance A B C D F
i
.f
I
I
I
.,
I
i
1
Additional commen1s:
.j
I
:1
-,
!
i
_ roIum tI10 compIelod _In lhe postago-pojd onve!cpa proIIidod Of I1l8Il dirodIy ll>:
Temec:ula Citizen Surwy.do Survey p~ Conlllf,S01SCanyonCroslllrivo Q107. Riv8laIda. CA 92S07
'floal18kY!J1Jd1
~TEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY A TIORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN E
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
City Manager/City Council .--
James O'Grady, Assistant City Manag~
July 11, 2000 0
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Consideration of "Temecula Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues
Sponsorship Request
Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:
1) That the City Council consider the sponsorship request for the "Temecula
Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues event and provide direction to staff.
DISCUSSION: Staff has received a request from The Theatre Foundation to
provide city support costs for the proposed "Temecula Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise to
the Blues. This event is proposed to be held September 29 through October 1, 2000.
This event would be similar to the Rod Run, which is sponsored by the Temecula Town
Association in February, except that no alcohol would be served. Furthermore, this
event will serve as a fundraiser for The Theatre Foundation, a non-profit organization,
with 75% of the net proceeds directed towards the planned Community Theater in Old
Town.
The ''Temecula Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues will be sponsored by The
Theatre Foundation in cooperation with Best of Best Shows. The Theatre Foundation is
fully supportive of this arrangement. Best of Best Shows, principals Pat Vesey and Jack
Grimsley, is a company specializing in promoting car shows and events. The business's
qualifications are attached for your review.
Additional information can be found in the sponsorship package, which is included as
Attachment "A" of this report. In addition, staff has prepared a summary of the event,
which is included as Attachment "B".
In addition to the fundraising for the Theatre Foundation, the event has the potential to
provide tourism and economic benefits to the City of Temecula.
In an effort to better understand this event, and to determine potential costs, staff has
met with the event sponsors. Staff estimates that should Council choose to approve this
\\TEMEC ~ FS 1 01 \ VOLl \Depts\CITYMGR\ Wolnicl<.g\Agendareports\Rod Rnn Cruise. doc
sponsorship, City support costs such as police, fire, and public works would be
approximately $30,000. The costs are estimated to be approximately the same or less
than the Rod Run 2001 event in February. Staff will work with event sponsors to
maintain these costs, as there will also be a Saturday evening venue held in Old Town,
which will require City support services.
If City Council approves the event in concept, staff will develop a sponsorship agreement
and bring it back to the City Council at a subsequent meeting for final approval.
FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that City support costs for this event would
be approximately $30,000. Funds have not been included in the FY 2000-01 Operating
Budget of the various support departments. If the City Council approves this request, the
funding will initially be absorbed in the FY 2000-01 budgets of the support departments
affected, with the understanding that these budgets will be reviewed mid-year. If at that
time there needs to be any adjustments, the proper appropriations will be made.
ATTACHMENTS:
"Temecula Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues
Attachment A - Sponsorship Package
Attachment B - Staff Summary of Proposed Event
Attachment C - Event & Media/Promotions
Attachment D - Budget
Attachment E - Estimated City Support Costs
"TEMECULA REVISITED" ROD RUN AND CRUISE TO THE BLUES
\\1EMEC _ FS 1 0 1\ VOLl \Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Agendareports\Rod RWl Cruise.doc
1fIID ~ 2ID ~Ir ~
IF CO) Dll III cdl2ID ~n CO) IID
,..;
11 . .
, J
/. 1/;:0
,r #? c-~
l~;, 1\~'-<1/ \~
\ C' ~.. '.\1-
L" ,
9., \\" 'I
\~, II
\~.. ~
60bbi Boes
President '
Dan Stephenson
Project Manager
Julie Pitruzzello
Secretary
"
Dennis Anderson
Theatrical Advisor
Members at Large
Patti Drew
Harry Clark
Bill Paisner
,
Theatre Foundation
A Non-Profit Corporation
27740 Jefferson Ave. #200
Temecula, CA 92590
909.587.6504
A cobperative effort to build a.community theater for the Temecula Valley
July 5, 2000
City of Temecula
Attention: Jim O'Grady
43174 Busine~s Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. O'Grady:
The Theatre Foundation in cooperation with ProMotion Best of Best Shows is planning
a fundraising event in Old Town Temecula for the weekend of September 29-0ctober
1,2000. Titled "Temecula Revisited Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues" this event
could raise up to $11,000 for the Foundation as well as increase,our visibility within
the local community.
We resp'ectfully ask for approval from the City of Temecula and City Council to stage
this event in Old Town Temecula and to help us in our fundraising events by
providing City Services as outlined in the attached proposal.
We look forward to working with the City and ProMotion Best of Best Shows in
making this a successful family event for the Old Town Community, Theatre'
Foundation and the City of Temecula. . '
Sincerely,
~fJJ~Jdh
. Julie Pitruzzello
Secretary
.'
,
'\
"TEMECULA REVISITED" ROD RUN AND CRUISE TO THE BLUES
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
The City of Temecula's benefits as a Presenting Sponsor of the "Temecula Revisited"
Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues:
o City log%r name will appear on all flyers, advertisements, poster, program and
promotional items relating to the event
o Free booth space at event
o City name on all press releases
o City of Temecula advertisement in the official program
o 10 event t-shirts
o 1 0 event posters
F:\Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Agendareports\Rod Run Cruise.doo
"TEMECULA REVISITED" ROD RUN AND CRUISE TO THE BLUES
ATTACHMENT B - STAFF SUMMARY
The Theatre Foundation in cooperation with Best of Best Shows will produce the first
annual "Temecula Revisited" Rod Run and Cruise to the Blues. The Best of Best Shows
is a company specializing in promoting car shows and events for Hot Rods, Customs,
Muscle & Classic Cars and Trucks in Southem Califomia for the past several years.
With a staff of eight, the company is affiliated with fifteen major shows and cruises.
The event will be held in Old Town Temecula on September 29 through October 1,
2000. It will include invitations to car buffs, special events and activities. This upscale
car show will offer trophies, plaques and large cash prizes for the Best of Best category.
The Search for the Best is a series of ten "Best of Best Shows." Organizers plan to kick
off the series at the first annual "Temecula Revisited" Rod Run & Cruise to the Blues
event in September 2000. The tenth show will be held in Temecula in September 2001.
The event promoters will stage numerous venues to enhance the event including a free
Saturday evening Sock Hop in Old Town, Show & Shine, "Cruise to the Blues" (a cruise
to the wineries), a raffle, 50/50 drawing, and a Treasure Hunt in Old Town. In addition, a
media event planned for September 9th will cover two Old Town events, the "Temecula
Revisited" Rod Run as well as the Hot Summer Nights Cruises.
The Theatre Foundation and Best of Best Shows view the fall show to be beneficial to
hold at this time of year because the weather is more mild as compared to the February
event. There is less chance of rain, which was a concem to many car clubs and car
owners that participated in previous Rod Runs in Temecula. Other benefits include the
media exposure and publicity the City of Temecula will receive as well as the economic
benefit this event will bring to the City.
There will be no Beer & Wine Garden or alcohol sold at this event. There will be outside
food vendors only if local restaurants feel they cannot accommodate the anticipated
number of attendees, which will allow the visitors to patronize the existing restaurants.
Temecula restaurants located outside of Old Town would then be contacted to
participate. Refreshment vendors such as popcom, snowcone, and soft drink vendors
will be able to participate. The organizers will allow for the downtown restaurants to set
up barbecues or sell food outside their restaurants if they wish to do so.
Event organizers anticipate approximately 300 - 400 cars and will limit the cars to 700.
The event will not bring in the same revenue that the February event has done because
the sponsorship levels offered are much lower. Sponsorship levels range from $50 to
$2,500. This will make it more affordable for the local businesses to participate. The
Theater Foundation will receive 75% of the event proceeds to benefit The Theater
Foundation.
Marketing and publicity will include posters, flyers, car/rod and entertainment magazines
and newsletters, major newspapers, website, and radio throughout Southem Califomia.
Local marketing will include The Press-Enterprise, KOLA radio, community newspapers,
and local shoppers.
\\TEMEC _ FS 1 01 \VOLl \Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Agendareports\Rod Run Cruise. doc
"TEMECULA REVISITED" ROD RUN AND CRUISE TO THE BLUES
ATTACHMENT C - EVENT 8. MEDIA PROMOTIONS
~ \f(Q) d M (Q)~ ~ (Q) 07J~
~...~.........~. /6 ...........
,..... ~
' <. -'
-:0 8..
~e4t oi ~eat Si<J.~ ™
M1Jilll0ill]~illILffij rnillWTI~TI1JillIID ~~
6~~ ~ ~~9
ill CID@ illllilIID CIDIID @ ~ITlliln ~~ G CID Gnu ~ ill TI llil ~~
~mIIDUmmro]])ffiIT ~~Ulln UllilITllil (ID(kUo n ~ ~(])(ID(ID
TIBDmm~mI'Il'llRI(@
, ,
'll'IlllIE 'll'IlllD~'ll'llRD~ ll?aDTIJRIIIDJIl'll'llaDRI
TID TIEGD TIDGDk015jIT~
Dill5jlY naB$) ~@@@
Afu@unu LU~~
JPIr@JM[@Un@IID~ u~e4t ~ ~e4t S~ uu
WIln~~ Wert ((]l([])~ We specialize in car shows and events
for Hot Rods, Customs, Muscle & Classic Cars and
Trucks. In search of the u~e4t ~ ~e4tuu, We know that
there are many fme shows across the country and we are
adding to those with the u~ ~ ~e4t' results.
([])UllIf fuun~iiIIDert~~ Ilnii~~([])rry~ We are an experienced group
that have been promoting car shows and cruises in
Southern California for the past several years.
A.fu([])un~ ([])unIr ~~~ffff~ Pat Vesey and Jack Grimsley started
the company, to help create more interest in this rapidly
growing segment of motor sports. We now have a staff of
eight and are affiliated with fifteen major shows and
.
cruIses.
WIln~~ IIIID~lkert~ un~ unIIDii<<nunert~ We believe in producing
and promoting only the u~e4t ~ ~e4t S~" for Hot
Rods, Customs, Muscle and Classic, pre-1973, made in
the USA, cars and trucks. Our shows will not only have
the traditional "trophies and plaques", but BIG CASH
prizes for the ~e4t ~ ~e4t,
,______________________________ _.__ ________ __u_.__,
i '7T'TJi'T0 DT!?/f'I TT TT! J:'1 m TrITT 7!T.~ TTJJ.7T'TJi'TTD
I if. Ml1Jl..L.L.!-1 \.L,.. f.JJ ..i!...dt'1._~ ..Li._W.~: 7 ~~:...v..Ll - ~J...:..i/
~ ~ ~~ IRS.C[J)]]) IRS.1lJN
&IIlliIll
66<Cffi.1UII~IE 1f((J) 1fIHIIE JEL1UIE~99
JFleallltll1lrnIIllg
HOT lRO]])S, CUSTOMS, CILASSliCS &. MUSCILJE CAlRS,
@@~~ JP'rizes JP'llll1ls TroJPillnnes -
The Search for the Best is' a series of ten 66~e4t ~ ~e4t
~lln([))'W~o99 Our plan is to have an annual faU car show, hdd
in Temecula during the month of September.The first show
win be September 29th thru October 1 st , 2000, and the
tenth show will be September 7th thru 9th , 2001. Weare
presently exploring sights for the remaining eight shows.
We anticipate them to be in the Temecula area.
"1fernme~unll~ Wnllll JB3e rrllne JHI([])rnme ([])if rrllne 66~e4t ~ ~e4t"~
JP>Il"ll7z~ I!Ill)(lDIlll~Y wnllll lb~ mwmIl"illl~illl m~ jf(lDllll@w~ m~ ~m~lln ~lln@w~
$4}([])([]) 0 ([])([]) JB3e~rr ([])if ~lln([])'W WnIIDIIDeJr
$ 2 illlilll JM:D 185e~ 1r C un~1r([D mrn
$ 2 illl illl 0 illl illl 185 e~ 1r IRS. ([Dill]
$2illlillloilllilll IB5e~1r cnlill~~n~ ClillIr
$2illlillloilllilll IB5ce~1r Mun~~nce CtillIr
(Q)IID 1rIln~ 1f~IID1rIln 5Iln(Q)w JIIID 1f~mrn~~unn~
@ un rrii IID ~ 1r Iln ~ IF ~ nn IR<. (Q)@ IR<. un IID 2 ([D([D Jl9 1fIln ~
WiiIIDIID~rr~ ((J)ff Ann NiiIID~ IFrr~wii(Q)un~ 5Iln(Q)w~
Wiinn C(Q)mrn n>>~1r~ ff(Q)rr 1rIln~
66~~ ~ ~~ P91rilttllce
~IID@ IFrrii7l~ M1DIIDii~~ ~~ ff((J)nn((J)w~~
1I' ({])~~n IPJrll7lte
Mmlltey
ff({])Jr ~nn
snll({])W~
66~~ ~ ~~ P9
Iffi ce ~ ~ (Q) if ~ TIn (Q) W $ ~ 9 ([]) ([]) ([D 0 ([]) ([D
IB5e~ ~ IR ([Dill! $ 51])1]UlM~
IB5e~~ CCun~.~([Dmrn $51])1])01])1])
IB5e~~ CCn~~~ii~ $51])1])01])1])
IB5e~~ Mun~~ne $51])1])01])1])
$ 7 9 ([]) ([]) ([]) 0 ([]) ([]) TIm (C ~u~ TIn JF rrllzz~ ~
i n\Jt h ' · n ~ ,~ ~ ~ , i
\'\] .
~IHI([])W WITILIL ITNCCILUID}E
V:9~~W~-{-A-{lj]t~-ell~~~-Jr-e~HmHl-yo
JF({])(IlHrll V ~IID([j[([])ll"~ (Local merchants if possible) N([]) .All~([])lln<<Dllo
<C~ll" S~ll~~ <C([])ll"ll"~ll (!Former Blacks Towing Lot, to keep cars for sale off c:i1
of !Front Street).
no
Zo
30
4}0
JFll"li([j[~y Nligllnrr &, S~rrnnll"([j[~I Nligllnrr9 ([J)ll([j[ 1I'<<DWIID <Cll"nnli~~
<<DIID JFll"<<DIIDrr ~rrll"~~rr 5 jpmrn rr([]) ~jpmrno
S~rrnnll"([j[~y Slln([])W &, SllnJiIID~9 , ~mrn rr<<D ,] jpmrno
S~rrnnll"([j[~y 66<CJl"Unli~~ rr([]) rrlln~ Illillnn~~99 9 ,] jpmrn rr<<D 5llDmrn (W ~
wlillll W<<Dll"lk ([])IID g~rrrrliIIDg rrlln~ WliIID~ll"li~~ liIIDV([])llv~([j[) ltD~rrrr~ll"
~xjp([])~nnll"~ jf([])ll" ~llll 1I'~mrn~~nnll~9 IID<<Drr ([])IIDlly rrlln~ ([j[([])WIID
rr([])WIID ~ll"~~o
'0 S~rrnnll"([j[~y ~JID([1l SnnIID([j[~Y9 1I'll"~~~nnll"~ IHInnIIDrr liIID ([J)ll([j[
1I'([])WIID 1I'~mrn~~nnll~o
~o S<<D~lk IHI([])jp &, Mnn~li~ (W~ w([])nnll([j[ lllilk~ rr([]) nn~~ ,]Jl'd
Srrll"~~rr9 w~~rr ([])jf JFll"([])IIDrr) JFJl"Ji([j[~y &, S~rrnnll"([j[~y IIDligllnrr9
(Ijpmrn rr([]) n ([D jpmrn)
90 JR~jfil1l~ &, 5([D/5([D ([j[ll"~WliIIDg ~rr IEv~IIDrr IHI~~([j[l!J1nn~ll"rr~ll"~9
Illinnrrrr~ll"fn~ll([j[ S([]!nn~ll"~ jp~ll"lkJiIIDg ~ll"~~ S~rrnnll"d!~y &,
SnnIID([j[~y 0
n ([Do W ~ wm lliimrniirr rrlln~ IIDnnmrnltD~ll" ~~ll"~ rr<<D ,([D([Do
50
~o
oCity Services will be needed from Saturday morning 6:00 am to 3:00 pm
with the down town closed as for the February Rod Run.
oVendors will setup on Saturday 6:00 am
oSunday, 8:00 am to 1:00 pm, with trophy presentations at 12:00 pm
oWe would like to close off Third Street (west of Front) or use Butterfield
Square for the sock hop on Friday & Saturday nights.
----
~JFc(]) N ~C(]) JR~
((JI~@<dl-nilil~ic-Iln<e-6~if--'1Pemmte.(C~
W <e wnllll w(Q)]rlk <lDlID ~<effilID~ Sl<dl<dlnIDl<lDlIDSlll ~jp)<lDlID~<lDrr~ Sl~
~<lD<lDlID Sl~ W<e IlnSlW<e ~nlty Sljp)jp)rr([])WSlll ir([])rr ulln~~~ ~W~lIDU~o
C(])unrr ~([])Slll n~ U([]) SlUUrrSl~U ([])lIDlly ulln~ ~~ ~Slrr~ nlID ~Sl~1ln
~IDU~~([])rry ir([])Ir <dln~jp)llIDY nlID c(])ll<dl 1f([])WlID 1f~mm~~unllIDo
1fllnn~ ~~ ~ ~~ jp)llSllID wnllll IDll~<lD IDUlrrrSl~U lIDSlIDl<lDlIDSlll
~jp)([])lID~([])rr~llnnjp)~ IDlID<dl mm~<dlnID ~([])W~IrID~~o
MtalIrIkcelnlrmg Mtal~ceIrntaln~
']I' -SllnnIr'tt~
IHhll tt~
IP'({])~tt~Ir'~
IHI({])tt Wlln~~ll C~Ir'~
AlIlltt({]) Ir'~ll~tt~an ~({])lIllv~nnnIr'~
o IBS~nnnn~Ir'~ w~ll~({])I!llllnnng ~lln~ ~~Ir' JPl~({])JPlll~ tt({]) (())llan ']I'({])wnn
']I'~I!llll~~lIllll~ ~nnan ({])nn ttlln~ ({])JPlJPl({])~lltt~ ~nan~ ttlln~nnJkJinng ttlln~I!llll ff({])Ir'
~({])I!llllnnng ~nnan ~ Ir'~I!llllnnnan~Ir' tt({]) anIr'nv~ ~~ff~llyo
o W ~ w({])lIllllan llnlk.~ tt({]) JPlll~~~ ~JPl({])nn~({])Ir' lb~nnnn~Ir'~ nnn (())llan ']I'({])wnn
anllllIr'nnng ttllnn~ ~v~nntto
_;:!2
AJDYVIEIP$.1fII~IIN G ~lUJFJF(Q) JR<.1f
MID] ([DJ1" ~ <eW~JPlIDJPl<eJ1"~
MID~IDLlnnn<e~ ~un~1ln ID~ 66JR([D@ &, Cun~~([DII1ID99
W<efu ~n~Iln~~
-tIfunn~n~ <ew~--IL<e~<e1ffi-
CIDJ1" Cllunfu~
<<J)nn<e ~IDJ1" ~llunfu wnllll fu<e if<eID~unJ1"<e@ ID~ 1T<eII1ID<e~unllID
JR<evn~M<e@ JR([D@ JRunnn
*******
CIDJ1" A@mmn~~n([Dnn Wnllll fu<e $]@AD@ JPJ1"<e JR<e~n~~<eJ1"<e@9
$]~o@@ @IDY ([Dif ~1ln([DW (IInn~llun@<e~ IFJ1"<e<e 1T =~llnnJ1"~)
A $5Jj)~ dlll~~mnrrn~ wlllllllbte gllVteJID ~G Slllll ~SlJr~ wIlnG Jrtegll~~teJrtedl
SlJIDdl ~umrvllvtedl ~Ilnte JFtelbJrUllSlJrY IRGdl IRUllJID llJID ~Ilnte JrSlllJID9 SlllGJIDg
Wll~Iln Sl $11 ~~ dlll~~GUllJID~ ifGJr S~Jrtete~ V teJIDdlGJr~.
~JPl<e~~ID~([DJ1" A@II1IDn~~n([Dnn IFrr~~
IEv<enn~ JPIDJ1"lkllnn~ $~o@@ ([Dnn ~Iln<e ~([Dun~1ln &, N([DJ1"~1ln
<enn@~ ([Dif ~([Dwnn (W([])jr!kIinng wft1tlln all N([])nn-IPJl"([])illltt (QJl"([])1lllJPl)
~ UilIIDllIIDlltdlIry
JB5~IIll~fn~~~
./ A fall show will highlight Temecula's good weather as
compared to the February event. We want every one to go home
bragging about Temecula, not complaining about the rain and
c-olill -- -- -~~ -
./We will expose more visitors to Temecula and the wine country
by having the "Cruise to the Blues".
./We will take advantage of the evening cruise Friday & Saturday
nights to promote the down town businesses.
./ A portion of the proceeds will be donated to
the Downtown Theater Foundation.
./These events historically have proven to be a tremendous draw
for people to visit and shop our great downtown area.
./In particular, the fall event will extend the busier summer
shopping weekends. Which benefit the shops, hotels and
restaurants in all of Temecula.
/!!fli c j!
"=> foo
.~ : j
*'" " \ib
~ J
a ,I ~
\Q) f, ~
b> 'Ill ~
COP
~ o~ ~t
~~~~
~~(Q)P
~ ffl ~ 1
~u
eB
E
o
(.)
.
III
~
o
U) ,g:,
::> ~
~_1Il
_fii0
en .@
- "'=
> 0
.",
III
o
.@
I
~ .(m ~
(Q) " J
~ ~ tI\
~ ~
'0 . ~
(Q)! 1t
b lID' ~
~..
II
~
~~Ie JIJ
'is ,nu ~I~ ~ '1
(@ !lil~I!Oi~~ ~
~ dil.u~ J ;
~ i! i III I! ! II~ I
~ ~ ! 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 11M III
~
~ ID
"'" mSJ
0:,- CD <c
~ ~ u.
f.I~ . '"
\... 0"5
l!! n: ~
~ ~
o
:;;
e
n.
~
g
y
~
g
, &
~
f!il
@l
~
~
J
I
~~
"'~
Iii'"
m'"
8'"
..~
1111.
I-
~
Ii 1
o 8 ~ ~ (9
~~~~~~'lii. @
li~~~~~~ .0
hjll~q~
!!!I! !J!~
00000 =,......rj~
I
E
~ E
.,
... ~ 8
~ ex) ~ en
q ~ ., ~
'" - 0
'" q .,
..... CO 1: S
~ ..... - CI)
o "? .s .,
0) g II) oS
.. Q) 9:! 0
., --
g 1.l @ gj
.r:::. I.L. .e .D
0. ~!
E
.
w
Cl
o
Cl
~
~
~
Q)'
>-
c
e:E
o l!!
,-001
0010
UI 0 ~
- a.
Colle:
o Q)'_
o.Eo
U)tIlOl
'- Z 0
Q) ...J
>-
u: 0 0
Cl
Cl
2 d.
". -m 1-:1l a~* ~
CD tIl e: '" -~ ~ '" 01
>.'- IDeo :>CU p
~8'~..!!1 IOCD Q.
m is. a;~;J.e (; 5 ~ .5; ~
S06 met. :E l!!C:~Q)C:~:E
- OCDU'J II) O.....OOcuUJ
o,l!l ~ tIl ~ 'W_O"" ~ tIl"" A...!.
CD c: .! ~ ~ ... ..9:"2 a. a."E _ ...
o '"' VI en _ c: ""# __ en _ c: c
- - 0 - ~'- ~ CD CD
"0 E 0.=' tIl > ;: 8 10 = 8 > >
e:CDe:oe: CD OCDe:oCDCDCD
cum 00 J:',-oo.....
CD 1: 0 .c CD :c U) CD CD .c CD :c :c
Eg!&3lE ok: oEE3lEok:ok:
aJ~OL.m 0 mm,,-moo
Z tIl...Ju.z or- 1;;ZZU.Zor-or-
000 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0
Cl
Cl
on
"'"
~
'8
o
II)
...
tIl
=
o
o
.c
-
tIl
"'"i E
o >. I!!
~..!!1 01
00. e
Q..!!! a.
U) "0 .S:
OIQ) 0
.= ~ >- 01
;: Z tIl 0
III "O...J
...
o 0
iO~
~o
1il '"
::;:e:
_0
a.
'"
'-01
oe:
eft.,
e:e:
OQ)
0.'"
U)~
...0.
=="2
.- tIl
:lCD~
"'EtIl
Otlle:
oZO
o
:l!:: 0
o
~
.c
U)
...
f!)
Q.
II)
"i
>
f!)
..J
Q.
.c
I!!
o
II)
c
o
Q.
U)
Cl
Cl
o
Cl
II)
N
~
...
o
ell
e:
o
Q.
fJ)
01
e:
:;:;
e:
C!)
ell
2!
Q.
e:
0
:;::
CO
~ "0
C
J :J e:
0 ~
:! . Q) U. "0
0' J .s:: .s::
0 - - .s::
:;:: 01 :J
0 ~ ~ e: 0 "
:3E ... :;:: >- "0
<> , J ;;:: .. Q)
.. Q) 1:: I/)
0- ~ e: :J
Q) co .c
!D Q) co
~ :x: ...
01 0
e: ....
'2
Q)
-
..
~
Cl
Cl
o
II)
...
Cl
Cl
o
II)
...
r::-
1il
~
r::-
1il
~
E
tIl
~
01
1n e
CD"'o.
C!"Ee:
10'-
O~o
O~OI
... .. 0
C!).c-
"0"''''
lIIt1lo
C!)OCD
J:oE
e:~tIl
Cl)I-Z
0.
o 0 0
_-oE
UI~m
CI)<1l...
_3=0>
c:<ce
OJ::Q.
0..<::
~ ca._
:l (J Gl
OGlE
e:C<1l
...OZ
:l
III 0 0
Cl
Cl
o
II)
~
r::-
1il
~
E E
'El!!l!!
lIIOlOl
~ee
.4: a.Q.
OI,S: .so
I! CD CD
OEE
~tIl<1l
,.zz
o
c;; 0 0
Cl
Cl
o
Cl
Cl
~
~
'-
,
"^""~~~;~'r.-.~ -
=
=
~~1:?,~'/:_" "c~'~,
*.:>7 '.,~ ( )-:s:,L;j"~:,>
f. "
J ~
,.""2-._-.-. >-,
;~~:,
,-;0
"
U
,U:a
oil
,-"
-"..-..' .....""'.
.~:' h~:~:"~"~.'~
:~.lb"o. -Eo.", ..(J
g ''''.''0: 0' <>
:l:i:o.~! 8
... o.iJ: (J~~ ~
';o,,'li$:t1i~U,,'lij ,I()
Ct;GJ- ,&-~;ti) : ,CD "t"""
0!D .m:m.m ..
~~f,i~~"F)"~
Cl
Cl
o
Cl
N
"0
E"8
...e!5
o Ol 0
met:
ca.e:
Oe:tIl
0..- CI)
fJ)oE",
... 0> co "C
e:.2 e: e:
cD,-,-cu
EO:l.c
CCDOCl)
- E >-.c
l\l "0-
t::tIle:>-
~ZtIl.c
W 0
~
CD
-
-
e:
CI)
>
CI)
-
o
~J"~[~ ~
,_::g~-:
--l\l' ,'"
i:L
-f,'
il
~,
-0
C
l\l .'.'
0.
~"~
Cl-
..,;;::
l!
.....-0
LtjGl
a::l!i
00:
Cl
Cl
o
Cl
or-
'"
1::
:E
'"
,
...-
0=
elltll
e:e:
00
0.0
fJ)Ol
t::.2
.- ~
.co
UlCD
I-E
C!m
GlZ
>
W 0
Cl
Cl
o
Cl
II)
~
~
1::
O~ ....-
0.0 ~e:
a..a.. CIJ~
:::SQ.ClJOa.CD
UJ:::J~ _
O":EoIltll
'6"O"'..CD
-c..!.'-o
-.- CD m
'-~oa >.a.
... 06 C fI) ~ CI)
o~-
fIlCDoIlQ)=.c
co. ~('(Jo
o!fmoe:o
Q.~CDa. .c
fJ)~EQ)&CD
asQ)aJ~ot!
'6zmu....Ju.
lD
2:00000
,
l!
10,'"'"
Coc"-'
o~
~.,
Ol'lij
.5 CD
c_
<DC
>_,0
WoO
"j't:}}"
'--S-::'ii':
~Jf( ~:<~:'
"a" ;';"'G):}9
'C ct) "t:F:_4)
U) at (IJ=:::- Q.
l!Gllll..!!
.~ .0 I:::\,;;. r... :>
a.. '-':)0,0 fI)
E'-:. ~-:~/L -g.2
J2:a;:, CU G) :::J
~.,fJ)O(J><(
::J:S
0:;:::;'00000
VI
;:
o
.s:
fJ)
~
~
~
CIl
IS
Q
~
'"
Q
~
~
@,
CO>
...
...
......
......
..c
oU
11II -
IU
c:i";
. ..
II!..Ol
E
Ol
I-
~ el!!
a....::ICG
ClfileO
C! "'2 Cl
II) .- Cl
tit :l!:1I)
E
o
~E
"'0
... 3=..
... o.
...,c..
<Qo'll""~:t
q...-o
...q"',c
~.l!ttQ
Cffi-oe6ll
"'''I'O~
0...'lO....
.oQtG::'
(jG1J.QS
g1i1~g
.ct&.~~
II!.. .5;;::
i5~
E
.
I!J
'" Ol
... ~ e:
:;: r.l "Ol_
e:- .ll!e:
oCDEoCD
o.CI)mtllQ)>
cn.c....a.
~Q)'-cu
;:0 [r.l=
(JI e:o
GiCD"S:oo
lDCI)CDCD.c
.cok:EE:C
S:otlltll~
_NZZU.
o
J:oooo
. ':'~'
-
Gl
Gl
E
~ea ~ ~e4
~~~@ ~@ffil@~
~@~~ @q ~~@W ~~OO
~@~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~OO
~@~~ ~@~ ~@~ ~~OO
~@~~ ~M~~@UW $~OO
~@~~ WlM~~~@ $~OO
/[J{]@lj ~jj!&~
cmWJ""I1"1J:("H"'O~
1MiI~~~"fill'll~ woOD Ib>~ <t>>1l'lI
il'il~ll'lItdJ fr<t>> tC<t>>W~1J"
fril'ilO$ ~w~ll'lIfrR
TI@~@~I@ I~~~OO~
CCfAt ~ CCfAt
ffi<lDaIl ffiunnn
&
CCnounn@~ l1<lD l1lln~ IlBnun~@
~~'~":
Beneflttin~
ihe
~@w~~@w~
~@~1@~ffii~~
&f~~ ~~~~@f
~@tIDrr~[J1)oll'il~
\I@rr {k[J1)@
~@~{k @\I ~@~{k
@~SI1ll ~(!l) IF'lJ"s."i] Si73 &.Il1l1lSIJ"OtCOllI1ll 1i\!iI000lllls 1XI(!l)~
1Rl.<t>>lllIs9 ~IJ.IIS~(!l)Il'il1lS9 Ii\!iIlJ.IIstCDs ~ ~OOllSSOC ~OllIJ"S
IFlTuldlal]f ~u!8lM 6-9 I))m <ClTllIUSe iO>UIdI 'ii"OWi1I
Sal~llIlTdal]f 7 alm io 3 I))I11l1 Slhiow 8, Slhiui1le
$al~llIlTldlal3f ClTllIUSe ~o ~lhie [SUllies 3 I))I1l1lI ~o 5 I))I1l1lI
Sal~llIlTldlal3f ~u!8IM 6 I))m ~o 9 I))I1l1lI $ocllt lXIol))
SllIi1IldIal" $lhiow 6, Slhiui1Ie 7 all1l1ll ~o 'il2 i1I00i1l
SllIi1IldIal]f ~wallTcIIs celTel1l1lloi1l]f al~ 'il2 i1I00i1l
Ui1Ii1olTmal~uoi1l 9<<l19.67I5-<<lI~77
~.lbes~oi1Jl)es~slhiows.col1l1ll
/
i-::;,-: ~ oj'
.:.J."'::<:;..tr.~ 1:_
~G)/;-c~;:':'
Merchant )
ulreasu Ire
Hunt
'?--J",y, , , ..
U1J''--r
(ciS'-]r ~\
c:-.n ..Jv
--;"\-<-
_r'--=' .:' '
Saturday
Night Sock Hop
Saturday
Cruise to the Blues /
/
Friday
Saturday
Night
Old Town
U@lJ'DD@(g;; Q,[] 0 S[)
C=O (Q)lJ'DD@ (Q)'lJ li[}D@ ~~ ~ ~~
\?\l'~dM(O~n(Q)O'))~
4-, C>
~... "8];1
&4t "' &4t S~ TM
~&DN 01Rl SIXIDNIE UIXIDS wan_I'.. IBIE ONIE OIF 1r1Xl1E il <<Jl
is'e4& 01 is'e4t' SIXOWS WU1re-:: b(,s..r.. SIXOW WDMMIEIRlS
COw.JIPIE1rDNG 1F01Rl 1r1l-l!1E 1rillriLlE OIF i$'e4& 01 i$'e4&
TO fSlE lDllECDlDllElDl &1r 1r1Xl1E IENlDl <C>IF iI <<Jl SIXI<C>WS
WOW! Tha SEARCH is OVl for 'i't1i! "Bas'i' of Bi!s'i''' ~o'i' rods eus'U"oMS. Musela aUild
classic cars aVId 'i'rucks. 1'i"1I 'i'aka 10 st1ows. aVId aact1 oVla wil( t1ava CASH prizas aVId
uVliqua 'i'ropl'lii!s. How's a'i'o'i'cl of i'laarly $20.000 9rab ya? Tl1a'U""s 'i'wi!1'i 'i'~olDsarnd
BIG ONE'S jVl CASH prizas. Wa waVl'i' 'i'o saa all 'i'ha i'laa'i' ridas ii'l So Ca i! ori! i'i"s
oval". I'i"s "Tl'la World ~rjas of Cool Cars and Trucks". So ga'i' your paoVl'l' job wQ)(ad
aVId your billa'i' ~aMs polishad. BriVl9 your Bas'i' ow 'i'o OldlowVI. for 10'U"s of furn!!!!!!!(!
~a you 'i'hara!!..!!
Sponsors
8""-@
D- . f/i
, ".".' \ lY- 0 emeculi'l
43200 BuSJness PilrkOnve
f'G Box 9033
. 1~"" eoMom.92S89 9033
i
I
REGISTRATION
Send in Proof that you were in the February Rod Run & Get a $5 Discount
Registration Includes Free Event T-Shirt & first 200 Get a Collector Poster
You MUST Include a Self Addressed Stamped Envelope for Return Confirmation!
Name: First
Last
Address:
City
State:
Zip
Phone (
Year and Make of Car
T-Shirt Size
Entry Fee $25.00 before Sept 4th, $30.00 day of event
Enclose Fee and Self Addressed Envelope, Mail Checksl Money Order Payable to:
&4t of &4t Shows P.O. Box 69, (Butterfield Square) Temecula, CA 92593 Ph. (909) 676-0477
RESERVATION: The event organizers reselVe the right to restrtct participants to acceptable behavior during any and all activities. tf for any reason participants or his vehicle is
objectionable in appearance or conduct, the participant will be subject to removal with no refund of entry fee. This reservation includes persons, things, conduct, printed matter or
anyacts or items of poor character, which are considered objectionable. Also misrepresented cars, make, model, or year, not American made, or pre-1973, will beaskedtoleave.
LIABILITY: In consideration of the acceptance of participation In the Best of Best Shows, by execution of this entry form I hereby release and discharge the event sponsors, Cfty of
Terrecula, and it's directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and servants, and anyone else connected with the management, or conduct of, from any, and all known
and unknown damages, losses, Judgments, and I or claims from any causes whatsoever, that may be suffered by any applicant to his person or property. Further each applicant
expressly agrees to indemnify and defend all the foregoing entities, firms, persons, and bodies of, for any and all claims, demands, damages, of any kind of his / hers Itheir principals,
agents, heirs, representatives, assigns, and Insurance carriers or any person attending the Best of Best Shows cooperation Vv'ith applicants and under the direction and control of
the applicant
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
~Drn1@~~@grn1@~~~~@~~D~@Uffil
a
a
a
'"
>-
:;
....,
C
::::I
II::
'C UI'lil
0 G>~
II:: ::::1-
_ u
'C lXlO
.!l G> 0
'iij ..c-
_G>
':;: N
S ~
G> ..
II:: G> .c
.!!! .. E
'S ..
" L- a
u 0 ..
G> II)
E
G>
~
in'
-
<:
3l
~
c.
-
'Q) t
00
"t:l
::l
o::l
~
1:: J
'"
s
fi
oj ~
-
<
III
'0
o
cO::
" -
o::~
'00
00
0::..,
'0
..
-
"ii 'i
os: u
~ ..
co '2'
'3lL
u
..
E
..
I-
...
o
1;; G>
OlE
... 0
" u
lXl.5
'0
:06
o UI
c.G>
eo;
lLf/l
000000000
(1)000000000
"OLOOOOlOOOLOIO
fa "-NcicDT""-NcON ai'
"""...... N or- CD
..
o
J:
o
~ tA-EA-tA-WtA-tA-fA-tA- fit
'0
..
..
u
..
"e-
lL
000000000
000000000
oaDONoeD N
OriLClct:i......-N-ajC\i ui
...... 'I"""" ...... II)
tA-tR-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-W_
a
a
~
a
lO
X
a
..,
<It
@)
a
'"
~
en 0 ~ ~
"8 8 e 0
0:: ~ 0 ll. g
o 08 ~ 0)...
J: g~ Q. .~o
rh @)>< '" ..
Q) co en g> '- CD
"t: LOfI},,-._~O"ii
1: ~ c>_'2~ 0- U'J
o c .... Q) co (/) "'
w....-:c >lL <:-'" iii
'- c: ~ (I):J o~.-
(Qwm,o>a.mo
O>O-l-cnD::cnD::1-
00
alO
OM
Ili
000000
000000
NLOLOOMLO
~T"'"-N--.:i
000000000
000000000
OLOOOOLO'VOCO
N- T"""-~NT"'"- N-
00
lO a
I'-lO
aj~
~
000
000
0001'-
-.:iT"""-
000
000
..."'..,
f')ai'ui
"'CD...
tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-fhfh-
00
alO
OM
Ili
000000
000000
NLOLODMLO
~T"""-N-.:i
00
00
alO
N
00000
00000
OOOLOv
~~N-~
00000
00000
OIDOOI'-
N C"'fT"""-
00
00
alO
..o~
~
000
"'0'"
"'NCD
~uirti
..,'"
tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-tA-fhfhfh
..
C> C 0
CD'~ EO) ~
UJ1ij 81- c.
c-e en cnQ)
..", D::Ql ~ t:G>
~~ en -m ll.~ ~ Q) ~~
w- ~.~m~~ >~O.9 ~ ~O~Ql
=g> mgEEa. ~'E~ ~ ~
c...OQlo<:::S =Ql'" 0 ~~'" ~E
iit:.~~g>o..'ffi(l)~ J!JEa:: -~r::~1:;~!!l~Q)
"'Q)~'-~mi8m~.a~~~~E~~~mBmE
"c.>~~ct_~~CClw.50~E~~",~W~C5~
u~~ooc_o._ocr ~wm mIOw~~
O~I-~oO-wo~cnJ:w~l-l-o-EOI-~D::~cn
..
III
C ..
&. E
.il .. 8
_ E c
,l!0:;:
o u ..
l-.5z
o
o
...
...
...
...
co
~
cD
...
~
o
'"
I'-
l!!
co
.c
Ul
"
o
:;::;
co
...
c
"
o
u..
"TEMECULA REVISITED" ROD RUN AND CRUISE TO THE BLUES
ATTACHMENT E - ESTIMATED CITY SUPPORT COSTS
Based on the input from City departments we received at the Rod Run II organizational
meeting on June 27, 2000 and cost projections for the winter 2001 Rod Run, the
following expenses can be anticipated for this event:
Police: $20,000
Fire: 3,502
Public Works: 3,000
Community Services: 1,000
Building & Safety: 1,000
Planning: 800
TOTAL: $29.302
F:\Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnick.g\Agendareports\Rod Run Cruise.doc
rrEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: James O'Grady, Assistant City Manager ~
DATE: July 11,2000
SUBJECT: FY2000-01 Economic Development Funding Requests
Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION: 1.
funding for the following organizations:
That the City Council review and approve
a) Funding for the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce in the
amount of $140,000.
b) Funding for the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest
Riverside County in the amount of $20,000.
c) Funding for the Temecula Valley Film Council in the amount of
$29,000.
d) Funding for the Inland Empire Economic Partnership in the
amount of $12,701.
2. That the City Council approve operating agreements with these organizations
and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements.
BACKGROUND: On February 21,1995, the City Council adopted the City's
Economic Development Strategic Plan. The General Plan's Economic Development
Element includes the Marketing Plan and the participation/support of the various
partners in economic development. The participation of the City's marketing partners
and their roles in the plan are stated in this report.
The City of Temecula's FY 2000-01 Operating Budget was approved by the City Council
on Tuesday, June 27, 2000. The Economic Development Sub-committee, conSisting of
Mayor Pro Tem Jeff Comerchero and Councilmember Ron Roberts, and Staff met with
the City's marketing partners to discuss their funding on Monday, April 24th and
Tuesday, April 25th. At that time representatives from each of the organizations made
presentations and provided additional information to the Sub-committee members. The
Sub-committee funding recommendations for the various organizations contained the
same levels as last year with the exception of the Chamber of Commerce.
IITEMEC JS 1 01 IVOl1 IDeplslCITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareportsl2QOO.Q1 funding requests.doc
1
Temecula Vallev Chamber of Commerce
The Chamber primarily supports the area's small business community, as well as
provides walk-in visitor and tourist information. In addition, the Chamber responds to
requests for tourism, relocation and business inquiries and sends corresponding
information to prospective visitors, residents and potential businesses. The Chamber
encourages existing businesses and residents to "Shop Temecula First" and provides
avenues for businesses to promote their products and services. The Chamber serves
as a representative for business legislative issues that affect the overall welfare of the
Chamber Membership. In cooperation with the school district, the Chamber plans,
coordinates and assists in programs that foster and encourage a viable working
partnership among business, educators and students.
Fundina Reauest
The Chamber received $129,000 for FY 1999-00. The amount of $129,000 was
budgeted for the Chamber in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget. The Chamber is
requesting $147,600 and is contained in Attachment 1.
Economic Development Sub-committee Fundina Recommendation
The Chamber had an 11 percent increase in tourism services this last year. In addition,
the Chamber will be expanding their City promotions to include a new event, which is the
Business to Business Technology Expo to be held in August. Due to this increase of
activity, the Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is for
$140,000. This is an 8.5% increase from last year, which is the same percentage
reflected in the City's adopted General Fund Budget for FY 2000-01. Upon Council
approval, an operating budget transfer from another line item in the Economic
Development department will be made to fund this request.
Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County
The EDCSWRC's main focus for the organization will be to expand on its successful
business retention and expansion program for the sub-region including the Temecula,
Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore communities.
The partnership with the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council has
furthered the efforts of the business retention and expansion program by developing
relationships within the manufacturing community and providing forums for information
gathering and sharing. The affiliation with the Manufacturer's Council has provided
inroads for the EDCSWRC to work with our universities and community colleges on
vocational training. In addition, the EDCSWRC works closely with City Staff and the
County of Riverside to increase its business retention efforts as well.
The EDCSWRC serves as an information source via its website providing such
information as statistical data on the labor force, data on the area's industrial and
manufacturing business base and outreach programs undertaken by the organization.
The EDCSWRC added the Loopnet link to its website, which provides commercial
property listings of available sites for lease or sale in Southwest Riverside County.
Fundina Reauest
The EDCSWRC received $20,000 for FY 1999-00. The amount of $20,000 was
budgeted for the EDCSWRC in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget. The EDCSWRC is
requesting $20,000 and is contained in Attachment 2.
IITEMEC JS101 \VOL 1 IDeptslCITYMGRIWolnickg\Agendareportsl2OQ().{)1 funding requests.doc
2
Economic Develooment Sub-committee Fundina Recommendation
The Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is for $20,000.
This will provide funding for the operations of the organization including business
retention/development programs, a newsletter, and quarterly informational meetings
open to the public.
Temecula Valle" Film Council
"The purpose of the Temecula Valley Film Council is to attract and facilitate film location
production in the Temecula Valley by acting as a liaison between the film industry and
the community. By actively seeking filming, video production, and still photography,
direct economic benefit will be generated to the area through location fees and the
purchase of goods, services and labor. Residual tourism benefits will arise from the
area exposure in film, television and print."
The Temecula Valley Film Council (TVFC), has been in existence for eight years, and
works in cooperation with the Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC). Both
organizations coordinate and follow-up on requests for locations in the Temecula area.
All location scouting and filming in the Temecula area is reported monthly to the IEFC
and is included in their report to the State Film Commission.
Fundino Reouest
The Film Council received $29,900 for FY 1999-00. The amount of $29,000 was
budgeted for the Film Council in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget. The TVFC is
requesting $29,000 and is contained in Attachment 3.
Economic Develooment Sub-committee Fundino Recommendation
The Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is for $29,000.
This will provide funding for the operations of the organization, attendance at two trade
shows, website maintenance, and development of an updated Production Guide.
Inland Emoire Economic Partnership
"The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) mission is to attract, create and retain
business in order to increase the region's growth and economic output. This is achieved
by providing superior services to members, clients and the communities in the Inland
Empire. It is supported by IEEP's core values of regional teamwork, marketing focus,
financial strength, integrity and professional excellence."
Staff is currently working with the IEEP on a regional marketing effort. IEEP is the
regional economic development organization covering Riverside-San Bemardino
Counties. IEEP programs include regional marketing, business development
(recruitment and retention), Small Business Development, Film, Tourism, High
Technology Programs & Services, Workforce Development and Governmental Affairs.
The IEEP has provided more focus on the Temecula Valley area in their marketing
efforts (i.e. media coverage, advertising, and hosting meetings). The Diamond Venture
Forum Luncheon held in Temecula in June was one of many initiatives the IEEP has
undertaken recently to increase its presence in Southwest Riverside County. In March,
the IEEP opened a satellite office in Temecula. The office is not staffed full time, but is
available for local meetings related to economic development. Also, the IEEP continues
its focus on the high-tech industry and has expanded its high-tech program.
I\TEMEC fS 1 01 \VOL 1 IDeptslCITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareporls\2QOO.()1 funding requests.doc
3
Fundina Reauest
The IEEP received $12,000 for FY 1999-00. The amount of $12,701 was budgeted for
the IEEP in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget. The IEEP's request is for $12,701 (1999
population of 48,850 at .26 cents per capita). This funding request is contained in
Attachment 4.
Economic Development Sub-committee Fundina Recommendation
The Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is for $12,701.
This will provide funding for programs and services to attract, retain, and expand local
business through seven different operating divisions benefiting Temecula.
In each of the attachments are summary materials including the work plan, financials
and agreements to support their requests. Complete materials received by each
organization are lengthy and copies can be obtained in the City Clerk's office.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds for the organizations have been included
in the FY 2000-01 Economic Development Department Operating Budget for the
recommended funding requests.
An expenditure of $75,000 for regional marketing in cooperation with the County of
Riverside will be brought before Council at a later date.
ATTACHMENTS:
1A
1B
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Funding Request
City/Chamber Operating Agreement
2A Economic Development Corporation of Southwest
Riverside County Funding Request
28 City/Economic Development Corporation of Southwest
Riverside County Operating Agreement
3A Temecula Valley Film Council Funding Request
3B City/Film Council Operating Agreement
4A Inland Empire Economic Partnership Funding Request
4B City/Inland Empire Economic Partnership Operating
Agreement
IITEMEC _FS 101 \VOL 1 IDeptslCITYMGRIWolnickg\Agendareportsl2OCJO.Ol funding requests.doc
4
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FUNDING REQUEST
ATTACHMENT 1A
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104
Temecula, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5090 0 Fax (909) 694-0201
April 10, 2000
Mayor Jeff Stone
City ofTemecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mayor Stone:
Enclosed please find our defined goals and objectives for the fiscal year 2000-2001,
budget and partnership request, a recap of "Services Provided to the City" and the
February 2000 financial statement.
As we continue to meet the demands of growth, the Chamber will consistently work to
provide unmatched service to visitors, potential residents and potential businesses. The
Chamber has taken a more proactive role in educating the business community through
marketing seminars and a Technology Expo. There has continued to be a significant
increase in tourism, relocation and business development.
The Chamber's aggressive fund-raising efforts make it possible to provide services to the
City at a fraction ofthe cost. The total value of services provided is $447,300 and we are
requesting just 33% of this amount. The City's $147,600 will ensure the Chamber's goal,
to provide the best possible services. The Chamber would like to request the funding be
scheduled for the month of June.
The City will receive tickets for events such as the Installation Dinner and the State ofthe
City. This request will be honored by the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
providing a sponsorship to the Installation Dinner to include 10 seats, and 20 seats to
State of the City at no additional cost to the City.
We appreciate the City's partnership and recognition of the Chamber's valuable
contribution to our City. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss the
opportunities of our continued joint efforts.
~-
Tony Turski
Chairman of the Board
cc; City Councilmembers
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
TVee Board of Directors
Value of Services Provided to the City
(Chamber's Phone Number is Listed on all Tourism Publications)
Total
Tourism
192,500
Walk-in/Telephone Traffic
Visitor Guides
Postage/Faxes/Printed materials
Internet-Tourism Information
Weekend Visitor Center
Informant/San Diegan/Outreach
California 2000 (Visitor Guide)
North County CONVrS Visitors Guide
San Diego CONVrS Pocket Guide
City User Guide
Business Resource Guide
Welcome Guide to New Residents (in progress)
Tourism Newsletter (in progress)
Tourism articles that are submitted to press, travel writers, etc.
Long Lead Event Calendar 10,000
International Visitor Center 5,000
One Page Street Map 5,000
Temecula Hidden Treasure Brochure 7,000
Old Town Temecula Map Brochure 1,000
Trade Show Participation 3,000
Fam Tour Participation 2,500
Marketing Committee Participation 1,000
Individual & Group Package 5,000
20,000
50,000
35,000
18,000
20,000
10,000
Communitv Information
132,000
Walk-in/Telephone Traffic
City Maps
Demographic Information
Relocation Packets
Housing/Apartment Listings
Special Events
Climate Listing
60,000
20,000
20,000
10,000
3,000
5,000
1,000
2
Calendar of Events
Internet - Relocation/Calendar/Schools
Organizations
E-Mail Response
3,000
4,000
6,000
City Promotions
72,800
Shop Temecula First Campaigns (2)
Business of the Month Program
Internet - Local Businesses
Business Showcase
Technology Expo
Mystery Shopper Campaign
Marketing Success Seminars Series
State of the City
Holiday Lights/4th of July Float
Monthly Newsletter Articles (City)
28,000
4,800
5,000
5,000
16,000
2,000
4,000
3,000
1,000
4,000
Education/Government
$30,000
School Promotions Brochure
Book Drive
Video/Mentoring Program
Issue Awareness
Candidate Forum
Good Morning Sacramento Forum
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
1,000
5,000
Economic Development Marketing Campaign $20,000
Welcoming Committee (Ribbon Cuttings)
Business Inquiries
Provide support to existing
Temecula business
Schedule City Speaking Opportunities
Retention Committee
. .10,000
6,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
GRAND TOTAL
$447,300
3
Services Provided to the City
(Detailed)
Chamber's Phone Number is Listed on all Tourism Publications
Tourism
The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Tourism Committee is comprised of
volunteers from tourist related entities in the community such as the wineries, Old Town,
hotels and restaurants. The committee continues to strive to promote the tourism industry
in Temecula and the region.
Walk-in/Telephone/Mail Traffic - The Chamber received 24,301 tourism phone calls,
13,360 walk-ins, 1,343 mailings, 345 e-mails, and 3,176 Weekend Visitors Center walk-
ins from July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000.
Visitors Guides - An updated guide will be published this year and will be available at
several local businesses that have high tourist traffic, the Weekend Visitors Center in the
Old Town Stage Stop, and at all local major events. In addition, the Chamber mails the
guide to individuals and groups requesting tourist information.
Postage/FaxeslPrinted Materials - As a result ofthe City's marketing efforts, there has
been an obvious increase in postage, faxes, printing of materials such as housing tracts,
schools, realtors, demographics, employment opportunities, apartment rentals, and other
specific requests. In 1999, e-mail, internet and faxing became much more popular.
Internet - Tourist Information - The Chamber's website is linked to the City ofTemecula
and the Temecula Valley Vintners Association. The Chamber is now able to update the
calendar of events, organizations, and member information from our office. Information
on all tourist aspects of the city are available on the worldwide net. The web site address
is www.temecula.org
Weekend Visitors Center - The Chamber continues to employ a professional weekend
staff person to assist visitors at the Weekend Visitors Center in Old Town. The center
provides weekend visitors with visitors guides, winery maps, Old Town maps,
demographics, and relocation information.
lnfomlant/San DieganlCalifomia 2000 Visitors Guide/Outreach - The City ofTemecula
advertises Temecula in the Informant, San Diegan, North County CONVIS Visitor
Guide, San Diego CONVIS Pocket Guide, City User Guide, Business Resource Guide,
Welcome Guide to New Residents (in progress), Tourism Newsletter (in progress), and
the Chamber's phone number is listed on every tourism publication that are submitted to
press, travel writers, etc.
4
Long Lead Event Calendar - The Chamber provides the City's Marketing Department
with calendar information on a regular basic. The information is used to promote
upcoming events.
International Information Center - The Chamber became a member of the San Diego
International Visitors Center in 1998. We supply the center with visitors guides, winery
brochures and Temecula Hidden Treasure brochures. A restaurant will open at the
location in July 2000. A Westin Hotel and ball park are being constructed in the area in
the near future.
One-Page Street Map - The one-page street map is an attractive tourist map and is used
by the Weekend Visitors Center, City and Chamber to assist visitors in Temecula.
The Chamber will publish a new map in 2000.
Temecula Rack Brochure - The City of Temecula publishes a tourism brochure
distributed in the San Diego, Palm Spring, Los Angeles and Orange County Rack
Service. The Chamber's phone number and internet website are printed on the brochures
for more information.
Old Town Temecula Map Brochure - The Chamber's phone number is published on the
Old Town Temecula Map.
Trade Show Participation - Chamber staff participated in the Orange County Register
Show on February 6th & 7th, the California Travel Mart on February 7th thru 11 th and
are scheduled to participate in the L.A. Times Register Show on April 29th & 30th The
shows cater to travel agents and consumers. Chamber staff is available on an "as-needed"
basis to work at various trade shows.
F AM Tours - Chamber staff and the Tourism & Visitors Council are scheduled to host a
Fam Tour in October 2000 and upon the City's request.
Marketing Committee Participation - Chamber staff actively participates in the Marketing
Committee and attends all meetings held by the City.
Individual & Group Packages - Chamber staff continues to direct Individual & Group
Package requests to participating hotels.
Community][nformation
Walk-in/Telephone Traffic - The Chamber is dedicated to providing quality, professional
service.
Citv Maps - 13,000 updated maps were published in November and are available at the
Chamber, City, Planning Dept., and the Weekend Visitors Center.
5
Demograohic Information - The Chamber assembles, customizes, and distributes current
information including census, community growth figures, demographic studies, and an
economic profile from Riverside County, the State of Cali fomi a, and the City.
Relocation Packets - The relocation packet has proven to be a valuable asset to anyone
interested in moving to Temecula. It is used by many local manufacturers to assist their
employees who are relocating to the area. It includes information on schools, utilities,
city and government offices, law enforcement, hospitals, climate, and a community
profile.
Housing/Aoartment Listing - Chamber staff visits new housing tracts and apartment
communities on a quarterly basis to provide relocation inquirers with a comprehensive
listing.
Soecial Events - The Chamber "makes it their business" to provide details on all special
events to interested callers. Instead of referring the caller to make another call to obtain
the information, Chamber staff provides the caller with as much information as possible.
This is especially important for events such as the Balloon & Wine Festival, Rod Run,
Arts Festival, and Tractor Race.
Climate Listings - Per request of many visitors and relocation inquiries, the Chamber
staff reviews the climate listings and provides inquirers with current climate information.
Calendar of Events - Staff interacts will all groups and organizations to keep a current
calendar for all events planned in the community. Citizens and visitors have come to
depend on the Chamber's calendar of events; the only comprehensive monthly listing of
events held citywide.
Internet (Relocation/Calendar/Schools) - All printed information distributed is now
available on the internet at www.temecula.org.
Organizations - The Organizations List is used by many new residents and guests coming
to Temecula. The list is updated on a monthly basis by staff members.
E-mail - Staff responded to inquirers requesting information on housing, utilities, rentals,
organizations, etc.
City Promotions
Shoo Temecula First Camoaign - Due to the success of the 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and
1999 campaigns, the Local Business Promotions Committee is coordinating two
campaigns in 2000. The campaign promotes shopping locally and gives residents
awareness of the availability of products and services while keeping tax dollars in the
community.
6
Business of the Month - The Local Business Promotions Committee started a recognition
program in 1997 which will provide visibility to businesses that go "over and beyond"
for the community. They are recognized in the Chamber's Temecula Today! newsletter
and on a local radio station.
Technologv Exoo - The B2B Technology Expo is scheduled for August 2000. This event
will be held at Pechanga Entertainment Center and the Chamber will promote the event
via website and publications in the San Diego, Los Angeles, Inland Empire and Orange
County regions.
Internet - Local Businesses - An entire list of Chamber Members (over 1,200) is available
worldwide through the internet at www.temecula.org.
Business Showcases - Local businesses have the opportunity to introduce their products
and services to the community.
Mvsterv Shoooer Camoaign - Each month, the Local Business Promotions Committee
sends out Mystery Shoppers to local businesses. The business with the highest score in
customer service wins the Mystery Shopper award. This provides awareness to the
community as well as to the businesses.
Marketing Seminars - These educational seminars are geared toward local business
owners and managers, and focuses on providing them with information on subjects such
as marketing their businesses. The Membership Services hosts special topic breakfasts.
July's topic, "The Mall.. . What will it mean to you?, January was Y2K, February "How
to Maximize Your Marketing $$ and August's topic is "Business Expansion" .
State of the Citv Luncheon - A luncheon is coordinated to provide the Mayor of
Temecula, Council and City Staff an opportunity to showcase the City's plans for the
year. The Chamber provides the City with 20 reservations.
Holidav/4th of Julv Float - Floats are decorated and displayed in the parade to encourage
the community to "Shop Temecula First".
Monthlv Newsletter - The Chamber provides the City with two pages of space each
month. The City has published articles such as the Future Temecu/a Library, Temecu/a
in Review 99, New Police Chief and Temecu/a City Counci/2000. The newsletter
received the prestigious "Polaris" award.
Education-Government
Book Drive - The education committee will commence a book drive through the month
of May, 2000. Books donated by the community will go to the Temecula Valley Unified
School District's school libraries. Book lists and drop boxes are at the following
locations: Little Professor Book Company, Fallbrook National Bank, ABC Child Care
Center, Dental Associates ofTemecula and JC Penney in the Promenade Mall.
7
Video/Mentoring Program - As part of the career education program, the education
committee is working with the video production class at Chaparral High School. To date,
two businesses have been filmed geared to individuals seeking employment. The videos
view key business leaders and their staff, and the available types of job opportunities
within their company. Students will be able to contact the businesses to make further
inquiries. The videos will be available in the career libraries at the high schools.
Issue Awareness - Issues relating to business are reviewed by the Government Action
Committee and when necessary, a position is taken. The committee's positions are
published in local newspapers as well as in the monthly newsletter. The Chamber sent
letters to the Governor's office and other agencies concerning the Glassy Winged
Sharpshooter Pierce's Disease. Other positions taken were AB Overtime (Knox) and SB
1149 (Speier) Family Care and Medical Leave.
Good Morning Sacramento - The committee organizes Good Morning Sacramento.
These activities strengthen political relationships with the state, county, local offices, as
well as the utility agencies.
Candidates Forum - The Chamber's Government Action Committee hosted an Assembly
and Congressional Forum this year, the event was televised and very successful.
Economic Development Marketing Campaign
Welcoming Committee - The Chamber schedules ribbon cuttings for new businesses.
This year the Chamber has experienced an increase and has presented over 13 3 ribbon
cutting ceremonies.
Business Inquiries - Chamber Staff meets with new business inquiries and provides them
with demographics, relocation, housing, maps, business newsletter, etc. Larger
companies are forwarded to the City of Temecula.
Support of Existing Temecula Businesses - Chamber staff is available to make courtesy
calls to existing businesses to ensure their needs are being met. The Chamber has
assisted many business with issues such as Lowe's, Papa John's, Southwest Traders, etc.
Business Inquiries - Chamber Staff meets with new business inquirers and provides them
with demographics, relocation, housing, maps, business newsletter, etc. Inquiries are
forwarded to the City ofTemecula for further follow-up.
Retention Committee - Chamber staff is a member of the EDC Retention Committee.
The committee's goal is to visit companies and to assist them with any concerns they may
have.
8
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Balance Sheet
February 29, 2000
ASSETS
Current Assets
Checking - FNB 2172715 $ 47,057.89
Scholarship Fund 137.78
Money Market - FNB 2541281 39,697.89
Cap Impv Fnd - FNB 2545120 68,159.93
CD Pacific Trust 75,942.44
Petty Cash 200.00
Employee Advances 250.00
Total Current Assets 231,445.93
Property and Equipment
Office Furniture & Equipment 74,140.39
Leasehold Improvements 2,203.13
Accum Depr - Off Furn & Equip <40,761.00>
Total Property and Equipment 35,582.52
Other Assets
Total Other Assets 0.00
Total Assets $ 267,028.45
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
( Current Liabilities
Federal Payroll Taxes Payable $ 4,905.25
FUTA Tax Payable 279.61
CA State Payroll Taxes Payable 535.27
CA SUI Payable 368.32
Health Ins - Employee W/H 432.00
Retirement - Employee W/H 400.00
Total Current Liabilities 6,920.45
Long-Term Liabilities
Total Long-Term Liabilities 0.00
Total Liabilities 6,920.45
NET ASSETS
Beginning Balance 238,909.88
Net Income 21,198.12
T otaJ Net Assets , 260,108.00
._--~. - ..- -.---- -.
Total Liabilities & Net Assets $ 267,028.45
----~-------
----~----_.
See ACf.:O'lIIftlllfS' Cu"'pilflt;o" Report
o
o
o
N
Q) Ol
U I: N
"0,,",
Q) III ,....
E.- '"
'-::J
E"''-
a,..Q
OE<ll
()ou.
....()~
oQj'C
.. O'l I:
Q)-oUJ
..c :l III
Em;;
cu..c:1:
-0
.c: '-:2:
()5:<ll
>, C .2:
Q) <ll u.
- E<ll
cu <ll..c:
>--
"'''
cu-c:
_en",
::::l <ll..c:
U E-
Q)0C:
Euo
1::2:
Q)-",
I- :c
-
'-
o
u.
~
<ll
'0
c:
=>
"
<ll
>
o
^^^ ^ ^
Ol(')LO-VCOOMO<ON M
I.OlONMO<o..-or---,.- N
(Om"-COMrovLOVU') M
I':\'{)- v N-N~T'"': M..- N~
VV ..- V
V
;;
C1
'0
:J
III
o
r:.
>-
aoaoooU')ooa L()
Q'q' 0001'-- lOa to
Ov ON<.oa MO (O~
1.0.0 I.().V.-.;;f-N- 1"--..- al
..-LO ..- ...... 0
~ N
...
to
:J
'0
<{
o
,
f-
>-
Ol.t)I.OCONOCOOVN
lO O)C'\/<D 0'> 'q"CQ 0 1'--......
COM..-......COt"--VI.OCOI.O
N- <D- ..q-. T'"': T"": M- M- N-
NLO ..- 0
~
...
~
<ll
'0
c:
=>
"
<ll
>
o
~ Ell"E:E 2
uQ)QOE- c:
'" E~~~()o"E"'''''
'- (l)urn.... EC:.,
(1) c: ....-(1. a. co E
.c 0"=C: --Oll>
E (1)'- 0>Q) ui...cU::2: 0
-'5c:E:::J(/) U
\U ro.o::::: c:QJ Q:; E06...::
Q) ~ ~:s ~ Q; co ..a.~ en ID
E;: C C Q.l > U E:J f;.c
0~&!8gc3.5:1i~S:6
"
-=LO~I.Oa:lao~o'VA
C"")r---r---N ..-M ............
..-0 N "'11'<0 mv
T'""-M- v.,--
V ~
;;
C1
'0
:J
III
oaoaOOL()oaa
ON 00 M LOO
Nv va ,..... ON
Mv ai N
N
~
c:
<ll
~
~
:J
()
...
~-
c:tO
<ll:J
~~
~ U
:J<{
()
1.001.0000000"'11'1"- 0')
MU1f"-..NO..-O (Doo 'V
(",)M <.oOV"- en..... 0
v. T'"': en- cr) o~
~ '" '"
IF>
^^ ^^ ^ ^
NCOI'-COlOQ')M co
COcn......NN(OOO N
m..-NN<D.....M 0
(])-~i V.l()-..--CD- co~
-r-V VV 'V r--
v v V
1.01.001.0000 10
f"'--NlO/"-l.OOO ,.....,
ac.oNM,....ar--- T""
r....: ('1") l.O- (j)- ,-- r---- "t:t~
I'- CD '"
~ N
N
..,.
M
,.:
o
N
Mr---I'--CJ)l,()O')......
O)Nc.D-.;;tN(O.....
o "'f"'V.....lO..-M
,..: T'""-'f"iN-T'"':
'" N
~
<ll
E
o
u
c:
'iO
~
o
f-
~2EO'EIDa.
en.-=: 0 ~ E" x
c:E CL :eW
., EU '" O"E '"
~oroU)UEC
WU'C ~.g.o ~
OlC W";n..cU2
U)coE::d~
<ll""""c:m.,E",
roro...._.cU)
en .... u W ro E";:: U)
CW::J>u ::J>-
Q) 0.-0 0 0 W 0 j2
a,OW(9...J2f->
UJx^^ ^^ ^
C'Ol.()J"-..l.()C'H.....CO
I""--N<DNT""l.()I""--
MI""---.;;f"YT""c.o-.;;f"
N-Y Y J"-..
V ..,.
V
...
..,.
0_
o
~
'"
o
o
0"
'"
l.()l.()Ol.()lOOO
MN Nc.o a
CO_I""-- M T""
'" 00
'" '"
mOI""--OMI""--N co
l() c.o I,()U')N lO
-.;;f" "<;f' Nc.o<D -.;;f"
T""- 0- M-
'" ..,.
'"
o
1'--
'"
I'-
^
o
~
'"
..,."
'"
V
...
I'-
..,.
~
ID-
00
~
'"
Ol
~
~
N
~
~
~
...
~
.s
os.
d
U)
<ll
'"
c:
<ll
Q,
X
W
.,
'"
o
:::.
<ll
E
o
u
c:
;!
;;
!:
.
"
"
"<:
.
.
'"
'"
~
o
f-
^
N
Ol
'"
Ol"
..,.
V
~
<ll
Z
'"
'"
'"
en
'"
o
'"
o
M"
Ol
^
'"
..,.
o
M"
..,.
V
...
~
Ol
'"
","
~
V>
o
o
o
e:N
A. 0 -
..., t/l al
U'-N
G3~1:'
E c.""
E=
E 0.0
OUCIl
U ...u.
CIlOl
_ Ole:
0"0.-
="
"'COe:
Q) W
.c-5t/l
E'-..c:
Ill:!::
-0
..c: 'OJ;:E
UQiCll
>'0 .2:
<I> Q) u.
t/lQ)
III e:..c:
> Q)'"
c."
Illxe:
-w""
:::::l
u en=
A. e: e:
"".- 0
E-:ti;:E
<1) Oi tI)
I- c.'-
0=
...
o
u.
~
"
'tl
<:
::l
"
"
>
o
-
"
Cl
'tl
"
m
Cl
...:.
.
>-
..
"
ti
<(
Cl
.
J-
>-
~
"
'tl
<:
::l
"
"
>
o
-
"
Cl
'tl
"
III
C
"
~
~
"
u
--
<:n!
""
~-
~ <J
"<(
U
^ ^ ^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^ ^
~~~~MOo~roomoo~~~mNN~~~ro~om~ N
M~v~ ~O~Na~ m~OM~m~~VNN~~O 00
VV~M me vID~ ~Mrov~OID~~MvM~m ~
N v ~N v~v V~~NN~~ ~vv v N
v v~ v vvv vv v ~
v
o~~~aoooooaoooaooaooaaaoao
~N~~~a ~oa~aoaaooaoaaaoaao
~~MM~~ ~oM~Na~oaoaa~oroav~~
~ N NMN~~ ~OO~~~N~N ~N
o~ ~
...
MIDNaMoa~Na~oo~mMvroNMv~NIDamm
~mN ~~om~a~omNmmromvvv~~~~m
.M~~ ~roa~~~mN~~~~voMm~v~ O~
N N ~~~~~ N~~~riMNm~ ~~
~ m
...
mIDc:c....-c<:I(f)E 0 J-
=~ cUQ.).QB~~~ m'~~"" 8
Ec Q.)C~-oQ.)~~.5""(f)(f)Q.) ~ ~
~ro roX.&Q.)cro....ro~.-ID~ Q.)__ ~
roc(/) .5cW~.~Q.)Q.)Ot~E.~~ u05 (f)
~""2~2<:~Q0I~"EEn!~<: ~.~ ~
~~Q.)2~.5o~ IE.~o~E~x 5Q.)~ ~
c'ffi~ ....ro;~Q.)Q.)Q.)Q.)w~uww~~ (f)~ x
~~~u(f)2~~ oouo '" _Q.)'ro ~(f)W
CIl<:-U~~..u-cccc~Q.)___cO.ClrnID~rnIDOO
~ ~ - ~rnrnrnrn ~--- m C~-C'-ID
~oE~.S~!eoo~~~~~rneee.~cS;~.rn.-a=
co~C~E~~ID~~~~rnID~~~Cooocc~En~
~o~rn~ooID~OO~~~ID=rnrnrnID~o.cIDIDm~=
~~~lIllIlUUQQEEEE::;;::;;~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^^^^^ ^ ^^ ^
a~~~Maa~aa~a~~~~aa~m~Mroarom
~vm~~oa~ ~a~NM~ro~ ~rovm ~N
m ~v ~a~ Mm~vMMvm NN N N
v~v vv v~ v v v v
v
a~~~aaaaaaaaaaoaooaoaaoooa
~N~~~O ~ ~oooaaoaaoomo 00
M ~~ ~ ~mN~woaoo~~~~ m~
0- N- ~- ~- ~.: M-
N
...
oomOMao~oaMo~NMMOO~~~~NOro~ m
NNM N OM M oo~m~N~a~ro~o ~~ ~
M N NON M N~q ~row~~ mN ~
~ oo~ ~ M ~
~ M
Y)
L()
...
o
r-:
...
~
M
en
o
....-
<0
~
"
o
&
'"
~
"
~
<:
"
~
)(
W
.~
'"
's.
d
n!
'0
J-
^
<0
...
M
N-
V
'"
~
S
<;
c
c
-.:
.
0;;
L()
M
00_
M
M
CITYITEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OPERATING AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT 1B
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
This Agreement, made in triplicate, this 11th day of July, 2000, by and between the CITY
OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of
the laws of the State of Califomia, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the TEMECULA
VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, a Califomia nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred
to as "CHAMBER") with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party
as true and correct:
I. RECITALS
A. The City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a business, industrial, and
residential center; disseminating information relative thereto, and of properly following up and
giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the various activities of City of Temecula
("City") and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, and business interests.
B. The Chamber has special knowledge, experience and facilities for disseminating
information; and is organized for and equipped to carry on promotional activities on behalf of
City; and to publicize and exploit its advantages.
C. Such activities are recognized by law as being in the public interest and
serving a public purpose.
II. AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
A. Chamber shall undertake, during the 2000-2001 fiscal year, to carry on promotional
activities on behalf of City and to particularly render the following services:
1. To maintain suitable quarters and employ competent professional personnel
to carry on the promotional activities herein stated.
2. To promptly answer all correspondence relative to the business, industrial,
and residential advantages and opportunities in the City of Temecula, and to disseminate
information by correspondence, newspaper public Agency and personal contacts favorably
advertising such advantages and opportunities.
3. Respond to legislative issues through the Chamber's Govemment Action
Committee. Organize a City of Temecula Council Candidates Forum inviting the membership
and community.
4. To prepare a long lead event calendar.
5. Assist in trade show and Fam Tour participation.
6. Develop and execute marketing seminars.
\\TEMEC ~ FS 10 1 \ VOLl \Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnick.g\Sponsored Events\chamberagreOO.doc
1
7. Coordinate the welcoming committee with the EDC.
8. To assist potential businesses in opening and relocating to Temecula.
9. To assist in the development and implementation of a city-wide marketing
plan to promote tourism and business expansion.
10. To promote and invite trade and business meetings and celebrations whereby
outside interests and individuals may become acquainted with the advantages and opportunities
in Temecula.
11. To support the City in all ways possible in the furtherance of the activities of the
City of Temecula.
12. To maintain a public office within the business area of City, easily accessible
and fully equipped for the purpose of disseminating information and answering correspondence
and inquiries regarding the City. Said office shall be open to the public not less than eight hours
a day, except Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. Chamber shall employ a full time
President/CEO, a portion of whose duties shall be to promote the welfare and activities of the
City of Temecula; its industries, business activities and opportunities, residential advantages;
and other matters of general public interest.
13. Retention Committee for community businesses to sustain and nurture existing
businesses in Temecula.
14. Produce and update relocation packets for new residents.
15. Provide demographic information to interested individuals.
16. Organize events to promote goodwill in the City such as the Shop Temecula
First Campaign, Technology Expo, Business Showcase, State of the City Luncheon, and parade
participation.
17. Maintain and update Chamber web-site.
18. Update and reprint Visitor Guide.
19. Update and reprint City Maps and one page Street Maps.
B. That in consideration of the services to be performed by Chamber for Agency, as set
forth in paragraph 1 hereof, City hereby agrees to pay Chamber, during the term of this
Agreement, the sum of $140,000 for the fiscal year 2000-01, payable on execution of this
Agreement.
C. In the event the City of Temecula should desire any additional service, Chamber
shall, upon request of City, furnish a proposal including an itemized statement of the estimated
cost thereof, and the City of Temecula may modify or alter the proposal in its sole discretion or
may direct the submission of a new proposal which may be accepted, altered or rejected. Upon
\\TEMEC _ FS 1 01 \ VOLt \Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\chamberngreOO.doc 2
the final approval of any such proposal and execution thereof, by the City of Temecula and the
Chamber, as herein provided, the City will pay to Chamber the cost thereof, and the Chamber
shall perform the work. All money due for carrying out said plan or proposal shall be supported
by a detailed statement of Chamber showing the basis of said claims, and certified by proper
officers of Chamber. Chamber shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for its normal
services or expenses.
D. The President/CEO of the Chamber shall prepare and submit to the City Manager
and Assistant City Manager a monthly written report specifying the activities of Chamber. Said
report shall be prepared in a format acceptable to the City of Temecula.
E. Chamber agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and their respective
elected officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage
to persons or property by reason of Chamber's acts or omissions or those of Chamber's
employees, officers, agents or invitees in connection with their services rendered hereunder to
the maximum extent allowed by law.
F. Chamber shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing
insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the
duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers' compensation
and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City of Temecula is the named insured or is
named as an additional insured with the Chamber and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability
Insurance to the City of Temecula. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or
any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall;
1. Include the City of Temecula as the insured or named as an additional insured
covering the services to be performed under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or
in connection with, the Agreement.
2. Include the City of Temecula, its officers, employees and agents while acting
within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in
connection with, the Agreement.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
A. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
B. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
C. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers'
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers' Liability limits of $1 ,000,000 per
accident.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Agency,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the
Contractor for the City.
\\TE:MEC _ FSIO 1 \ VOLI \Depts\CITYMGR\WoInickg\Sponsored Events\chamberagreOO.doc
3
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided
that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason
whatsoever, the City of Temecula shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return
receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before.
6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by
the City of Temecula. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such
deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or
the Chamber shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation
claim administration and defense expenses.
G. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney's fees, in addition any other relief to which it may be entitled.
H. This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and
terminating June 30, 2001.
I. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice
with any sums due and payable hereunder.
\\TEMEC _ FS 1 0 1\ VOLl \Dq>ts\CITYMGR\ Wolnickg\Sponsored Evmts\chamberagreOO.doc
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA VALLEY
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Steven J. Ford, Mayor
Tony Turski,
Chairman of the Board
ATTEST:
Alice Sullivan
President/CEO
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lewis Randall
Treasurer
Peter Thorson, Agency Attorney
Janet Beck
Secretary
\\TEMEC _ FS 1 0 1\ VOLllDepts\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\chamberagreOO.doc
5
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY FUNDING REQUEST
ATTACHMENT2A
April 10, 2000
Economic Development Subcommittee
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: FUNDING REQUEST FOR FY2000-01
Dear Subcommittee:
Enclosed please find the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County
2000-2001 Operational Budget, Implementation Plan Executive Summary, Mission Statement
and Summary of Activity 1999-2000.
The budget was approved by the Board of Directors on April 3, 2000 and includes anticipated
revenue from the City of Temecula in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00).
Although the budget reflects a shortfall of $2, 125.00, it may be mitigated by the inclusion of one
or more fund-raising events. We hope to secure the funding by July 1, 2000, which is the start of
our fiscal year. Additionally, there are no anticipated changes to the existing contract between
the City and EDCSWRC.
Thank you for your consideration in this request. We look forward to meeting with you on our
new date and time of April 24th at 9:35 a.m.
Respectfully,
ywvvu f:1M)t~
Diane Sessions
Administrator
cc: Gary Youmans, EDCSWRC Chairman
encl: 1999/2000 Summary of Activity
2000-2001 Operational Budget
Mission Statement
Implementation Plan - Executive Summary
Post Office Box 1388 . Temecula, CA 92593-1388 . Office 909/695-5130 . FAX 909/695-5126
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County is to
enhance the business climate in and around the communities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and
Temecula by promoting economic growth and supporting a business environment to encourage
job creation and business expansion. These goals allow the organization to assist in creating a
desirable lifestyle in which members of the community can live and work.
IMPLELEMTATION PLAN FOR THlE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORJPORA'HON
FOR SOU'fJ8[WJEST JRNJERSIDlE COUNTY
Executive Summary
The success of the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County (EDC)
will depend on the development ofa strategic plan that will be developed and implemented by
the members of the EDC. This plan will need to be comprehensive yet flexible to allow the EDC
to adjust to the changing business climate as well as economic changes that could be in the
foreseeable future. The plan would need to be a plan that the business community believes can
assist them in creating a strong economic base that will help them grow and expand. Finally, the
plan would need to be one that the cities of Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, and Temecula as well as our
county partner can be comfortable that their investment is meeting the needs of their city and
creating a strong regional economic base that will benefit the entire area.
The Implementation Plan was brought together with information that was developed in a series
of discussion groups as well as input from the general membership. Information from experts in
the field of economic development were also solicited and were active in the discussion groups
mentioned earlier.
The plan will center in five key areas. The plan is not limited to the following and as mentioned
earlier will have the ability to add to or delete items as needed. The key areas that will be part of
the plan are as follows:
I. Retain and expand business to Southwest Riverside County.
2. Create a synergy between the business community, the public agencies, and eC9110mic
development organizations of the community.
3. The EDC will facilitate a streamlined environment where the public and private
entities can work in partnership for the creation and retention of employment in the
area.
4. Develop an information source via newsletters, luncheons, and seminar presentations
so as to create a source of a public education to assist all businesses.
5. Be a focal point oflocal efforts to promote and enhance a healthy economy.
In order to reach these objectives, the EDC must continue to expand its membership so as to
better fund the efforts outlined above. Expansion of membership will also attract additional
expertise in all areas that will be needed. Currently membership is centered in the Temecula area
and further membership from Murrieta and Lake Elsinore will be needed to meet the regional
goals that are a part of this organization. This expansion will include civic and trade
organizations that also have the common goal of a strong economic business community.
These organizations will include but not be limited to Chambers of Commerce, clubs and
educational partners as well as trade organizations such as the Manufacturers Council.
While the goals presented here are certainly aggressive given the current state of the EDC,
Southwest Riverside County needs the EDC to be that organization that will take a leadership
role and has as its primary goal the development of quality jobs for the area. If successful, the
businesses in the area will expand, new businesses will be attracted to the area and more jobs
will be generated. With these new jobs, the over 50% of the working population that works
outside of Southwest Riverside County may find work in the area. This will produce the perfect
balance between what is already a desirable place to live with a business climate that will support
its residents.
..
.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COPRPORA TION
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY
July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000
Business Development
o The EDCSWRC packaged responses to 44 leads generated by a variety of sources
including the City of Temecula, Inland Empire Economic Partnership, California
Trade and Commerce, existing businesses, commercial real estate brokers (local and
out of area), construction companies (local and out of area), Business Facilities, and
Site Selection magazine.
o The EDCSWRC hosted a luncheon and tour of available properties with site selectors
and company representatives.
o The EDCSWRC co-sponsored the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers'
Council Exposition in November 1999; the open house for the Temecula and Hemet
Workforce Development Center; and is a partner of the Southwest Riverside County
Career Fair 2000 scheduled for April 22, 2000.
Business Retention/lExpansion
o As of April 10, 2000, the Business Relations Committee completed 34 visitations
during the 1999-00 fiscal year. Surveys were collected in person, by telephone, and
by written contacts. To date, committee members received and responded to 16
miscellaneous action items regarding traffic, Fast Track permitting for expansion,
street reconfiguration, utility rates, zoning, city fees, information on the SWRC
Manufacturers' Council, banking, signage/visibility, funding for expansion, technical
training referrals, development impact fees, labor shortage, and business relocation.
o Two site tours were conducted showcasing businesses in Temecula.
o The EDCSWRC, with the cities of Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Temecula,
their respective Chambers of Commerce, and Riverside County Economic
Development Agency, presented the results of the Southwest Riverside County 1999
Business Census Survey. The Riverside County Economic Development Agency's
Workforce Development Board of Directors funded the survey project through a
business visitation grant. Survey questions focused on the needs of employers in
Southwest Riverside County to such issues as labor skills, available training
programs, governmental regulatory concerns, technical assistance, external business
factors and company profiles. Results were published in booklet format and will be
available for viewing on the EDCSWRC web site by April I?, 2000.
,
Summary of Activity
July 1, 1999 - June 30,2000
Page 2 of3
Education/MarketinglOutreach
o EDCSWRC participated in 10 general meetings of the Southwest Riverside County
Manufacturers' Council. There are reciprocal board positions that exist between the
two organizations.
o EDCSWRC co-sponsored the SWRC Manufacturers Council Business Exposition in
November 1999. The event was held at the Temeku Golf Clubhouse. The Council
will provide a reciprocal co-sponsorship for the EDC's annual golf tournament on
June 13, 2000.
o EDCSWRC attended 5 Temecula CONNECT Links luncheons to date. There are
reciprocal memberships that exist between the two organizations.
o EDCSWRC attended 2 Lake Elsinore Chamber of Com merce/E DC luncheons to date.
There are reciprocal memberships between the two organizations. The L.E. EDC has
implemented a business visitation program modeled after the EDCSWRC Business
Relations Committee. The two groups will work together for business retention and
expansion in the City of Lake Elsinore and Wildomar.
o EDCSWRC attended 1 Third District Quarterly Workshop hosted by County
Supervisor Jim Venable. Most attendees are economic partners (Chambers of
Commerce, EDCs, city staff, etc.) in Riverside County's third district. EDCSWRC
will attend the upcoming quarterly workshop on April 19, 2000.
o EDCSWRC was a partner in the Business Resource Guide project. The
comprehensive guide was designed to assist the business community with access to a
collection of available resources. The project is in its completion stages and will go to
print by early-May 2000.
o EDCSWRC is preparing a new one-page brochure to highlight its resource assistance
to existing businesses in Southwest Riverside County. This collateral material will be
used at trade shows, in lead responses, membership solicitations, and as handouts to
the community at large.
o EDCSWRC added Loopnet link to its web site, which provides commercial property
listings of available sites for lease or sale. Visitors are able to view available
commercial properties in the Southwest County region.
,
,"
,
Summary of Activity
July 1, 1999 - June 30, 2000
Page 3 of3
o EDCSWRC moved into the Workforce Development Center (WDe) in Temecula,
where it has established daily working relations with Riverside County Economic
Development Agency, Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance, Employment
Development Department, Office on Aging, Mt. San Jacinto Community College,
EDA's ACCESS, and Center for Employment Training (CET). The SWRC
Manufacturer's Council is now using the WDC to hold its monthly programs. These
affiliations allow all economic partners to create more successful programs because
of ever-growing network support.
o EDCSWRC attended and/or participated in the following events:
o Mid Year Market Review sponsored by Inland Empire NAIOP
o Community Partners Meeting sponsored by the Inland Empire Economic
Partnership (IEEP)
o Inland Valley Chamber of Commerce Night at the Diamond Stadium, Lake
Elsinore
o Basics of Exporting Seminar
o Marketing California Forum sponsored by California Trade & Commerce
o Temecula's State of the City Luncheon
o EDCSWRC Quarterly Membership Luncheons (3)
o T emecula Brokers' Meeting (1)
o Murrieta Brokers' Quarterly Meeting (2)
o Reception hosted by the DC Riverside Planned Giving Advisory Board
o WRCOG SATISY 2020 Meetings (2)
o Workforce Investment Act Workshop in San Bernardino
o Team California Marketing Roundtable
o California Bank & Trust Holiday Party
o D.L. Phares & Associates Holiday Open House
o Workforce Development Open House
o IEEP- T emecula Open House
o Temecula/Hemet Employee Advisory Council Luncheons (2)
o Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Meetings (3)
o Lunch meetings with associates from Ernst & Young (2) and CDC Small
Business Finance Corp. (2)
EDC SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
OPERATING BUDGET
JULY 1, 2000 TO JUNE 30, 2001
REVENUE
Membership - Cash $ 55,000.00
City Participation $ 30,000.00
*County Participation $ 11,000.00
Special Events $ 18,800.00
Quarterly Luncheons $ 4,000.00
Interest Income $ 175.00
Miscellaneous $ 500.00
TOTAL REVENUE $ 119,475.00
EXPENDITURES
Total Personnel Services $ 60,000.00
Direct Operating Expense
Advertising $ 300.00
Consulting Fees $ 15,000.00
Insurance $ 2,000.00
Office Supplies $ 1,500.00
Maintenance Supplies $ 100.00
Minor Equipment $ 100.00
Telephone $ 3,000.00
Postage $ 3,000.00
Printing/copying/binding $ 4,000.00
Dueslmemberships $ 300.00
Conferenceltraining $ 500.00
Travel $ 500.00
Meals/entertainment $ 100.00
* Rent $ 10,800.00
Internet $ 2,500.00
Taxes & License $ 200.00
Miscellaneous Expenses $ 100.00
Total Direct Operating Expense $ 44,000.00
Direct Program Expense
Membership Drive $ 2,000,00
Membership Commissions $
Public Relations $ 100,00
Newsletter Expense $ 2,500.00
Quarterty Luncheons $ 4,000.00
Trade Show Attendance $ 200.00
Golf Toumament $ 8,800.00
Total Direct Program Expense $ 17,600.00
Equipment Expense
Equipment lease $
Service Agreement $
Software/Hardware $
Total Equipment Expense $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 121,600.00
EXCESS EXPENDITURES OVER REVENUE 11$ (2,125.00lll
'In-kind contribution in the form of office space
CITY/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATING AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT2B
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
THE TEMECULA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
doing business as the
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
REGARDING
THE PROVISION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
This Agreement, made in triplicate, this 11th day of July, 2000, by and between the CITY
OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the
laws of the State of Califomia, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the TEMECULA VALLEY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, doing business as the ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY, a California
nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "EDCSWRC") with reference to the following
facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct:
RECITALS
A. The City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a business, industrial, and
residential center; disseminating information relative thereto, and of properly following up and
giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the various activities of City of Temecula
("City") and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, and business interests.
B, The EDCSWRC has special knowledge, experience and facilities for accomplishing
economic development activities,
C. The City now desires to retain the EDCSWRC to accomplish various economic
activities and the EDCSWRC is willing to be so retained pursuant to the terms and conditions of
this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EDCSWRC
1.1 The EDCSWRC shall undertake, during the 2000-01 fiscal year, to carry on the
EDCSWRC's scope of services as listed in the attached executive summary (refer to Exhibit
#1), which is attached to and made a part of this agreement. These services include business
relations, business development, community outreach, and education programs. These duties
may be adjusted from time to time as agreed upon by the EDCSWRC and the City.
1.2 The Executive Director of the EDCSWRC shall prepare and submit to the City
Manager and Assistant City Manager a monthly written report specifying the activities of the
EDCSWRC. Said report shall be prepared in a format acceptable to the City of Temecula.
1
\\TEMEC _ FS 101\ VOLt \Dq>ts\CITYMGR\Wolnidcg\Sponsored Events\edcagreementOO.doc
2. PAYMENT TO EDCSWRC
2.1 In consideration of the services to be performed by the EDCSWRC for the City
as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, the City hereby agrees to pay the EDCSWRC, the sum of
$20,000. This shall be considered a payment for services rendered from July 1, 2000 through
June 30, 2001.
2.2 In the event the City should desire any additional services, the EDCSWRC may,
upon request of the City, furnish a proposal including, an itemized statement of the estimated
cost thereof, and the City may modify or alter the proposal, or may reject the proposal in its
entirety at its sole discretion, or may direct the submission of a new proposal which may be
accepted, altered or rejected. Upon the final approval of any such proposal and execution
thereof by the EDCSWRC and the City, as herein provided, the City will pay to the EDCSWRC
the cost thereof and the EDCSWRC shall perform the services set forth in the proposal. All
money due for carrying out said plan or proposal shall be supported by a detailed statement of
the EDCSWRC showing the basis of said claims, and certified by proper officers of the
EDCSWRC.
3. INDEMNIFICATION
The EDCSWRC agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected
officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from claims for damage to persons
or property by reason of the EDCSWRC's acts or omissions or those of the EDCSWRC's
employees, officers, agents or invitees in connection with their services rendered hereunder to
the maximum extent allowed by law.
4. INSURANCE
The EDCSWRC shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing
insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the
duration of this Agreement a policy of workers compensation and employers' Liability Insurance
in which the City is the named insured or is named as an additional insured with the EDCSWRC
and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability Insurance to the City Manager of the City of Temecula
before execution of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or
any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall:
4.1 Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering the
services to be performed under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection
with, the Agreement.
4.2 Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope
of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the
Agreement. Provide the following minimum limits:
A. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
2
\\TEMEC _ FSIOl \ VOLl \Depts\CITYMGR\Wotnic:kg\Sponsored Even:ts\edcagreementOO.doc
B. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident for bodily injury and property damage.
C. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per
accident.
4.3 The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the
Contractor for the City.
4.4 Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that,
in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the
City of Temecula shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested,
not less than thirty (30) days before.
4.5 Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the
City of Temecula. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such
deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or
the EDCSWRC shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation
claim administration and defense expenses.
5. ATTORNEY'S FEES
Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto conceming the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney's fees, in addition any other relief to which it may be entitled.
6. TERM
This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000, and
terminating June 30, 2001.
6.1 This Agreement may be terminated for any reason, by either party upon thirty (30)
days written notice with any sums due and payable hereunder for services actually performed.
7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the
obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous
agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into
this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
3
\\TEMEC ~ FSI 0 1 \ VOLt \Depts\CITYMGR\WoInidcg\Sponsored Events\edcagreementOO.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA VALLEY ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
doing business as the
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION OF
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
Gary Youmans, President
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Phil Oberhansley, Secretary
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
4
\\lEMEC _ FSl 0 1\ VOLI \Dqrts\CITYMGR\Wohtidcg\Sponsored Events\edcagreementOO.doc
E){HIIBIT #1
EDC5WRC's Scope of Services
5
\\1E.MEC _ FS 1 0 1\ VOLI \Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\edcagreementoO.doc
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County is to
enhance the business climate in and around the communities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and
Temecula by promoting economic growth and supporting a business environment to encourage
job creation and business expansion. These goals allow the organization to assist in creating a
desirable lifestyle in which members of the community can live and work.
.
-'
JlMPLELEM'fAnON PLAN lFOR 'fJE[E ECONOMiC DEVELOPMEN'f COllU'OJRA.nON
lFOR SOU'flffiWES'f llUVElRSmIliE COUN'fY
Executive Summary
The success of the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County (EDe)
will depend on the development of a strategic plan that will be developed and implemented by
the members of the EDC. This plan will need to be comprehensive yet flexible to allow the EDC
to adjust to the changing business climate as well as economic changes that could be in the
foreseeable future. The plan would need to be a plan that the business community believes can
assist them in creating a strong economic base that will help them grow and expand. Finally, the
plan would need to be one that the cities of Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, and Temecula as well as our
county partner can be comfortable that their investment is meeting the needs of their city and
creating a strong regional economic base that will benefit the entire area.
The Implementation Plan was brought together with information that was developed in a series
of discussion groups as well as input from the general membership. Information from experts in
the field of economic development were also solicited and were active in the discussion groups
mentioned earlier.
The plan will center in five key areas. The plan is not limited to the following and as mentioned
earlier will have the ability to add to or delete items as needed. The key areas that will be part of
the plan are as follows:
1. Retain and expand business to Southwest Riverside County.
2. Create a synergy between the business community, the public agencies, and economic
development organizations of the community.
3. The EDC will facilitate a streamlined environment where the public and private
entities can work in partnership for the creation and retention of employment in the
area.
4. Develop an information source via newsletters, luncheons, and seminar presentations
so as to create a source of a public education to assist all businesses.
5. Be a focal point oflocal efforts to promote and enhance a healthy economy.
In order to reach these objectives, the EDC must continue to expand its membership so as to
better fund the efforts outlined above. Expansion of membership will also attract additional
expertise in all areas that will be needed. Currently membership is centered in the Temecula area
and further membership from Murrieta and Lake Elsinore will be needed to meet the regional
goals that are a part ofthis organization. This expansion will include civic and trade
organizations that also have the common goal ofa strong economic business community.
;/
These organizations will include but not be limited to Chambers of Commerce, clubs and
educational partners as well as trade organizations such as the Manufacturers Council.
While the goals presented here are certainly aggressive given the current state of the EDC,
Southwest Riverside County needs the EDC to be that organization that will take a leadership
role and has as its primary goal the development of quality jobs for the area. If successful, the
businesses in the area will expand, new businesses will be attracted to the area and more jobs
will be generated. With these new jobs, the over 50% of the working population that works
outside of Southwest Riverside County may find work in the area. This will produce the perfect
balance between what is already a desirable place to live with a business climate that will support
its residents.
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL FUNDING REQUEST
ATTACHMENT3A
r~v~r~c~
2000 - 2001 OPERATIONAL BUDGET
REVENUE
City of Ternecula
Fundraising
$29,000.00
Unknown at this time
TOTAL REVENUE $ 29,000.00
EXPENDITURES
Personnel Services
(PT 20 hrs a week)
$ 8400.00
Direct Operating Expense
InternetlWebsite'
Consulting Fees
Insurance
Office Supplies
Telephone/Fax'
Postage
Printing/copying
(Postcards/Newsletters)
Office Rent
$1200.00
none
$1200.00
$1200.00
$1000.00
$1500.00
$5000.00
free
Total Direct Operating Expense
$11,100.00
Direct Program Expense
Trade Shows"
( 2 shows Temecula only))
Mernbership/Dues
FAM Tours/Scouting
Production Guide'
$3000.00
Total Program Expense
$ 500.00
$1000.00
$5000.00
$ 9500.00
Total Film Council Expenses
$29,000.00
'Reduced frorn 1999-2000 request.
"Increased from 1999-2000 request to allow Ternecula only booths at 2 trade shows.
In the past booths were shared with the IEFC which also covers all of San Bernardino
and Riverside counties and greatly lirnited Ternecula's representation. Temecula only
booths will also allow resort, winery and Charnber representation in promoting the
Ternecula Valley.
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
1999 - 2000 OPERATIONAL BUDGET
REVENUE
City of Ternecula
Fundraising
EXPENDITURES
Personnel Services
(PT 20 hrs a week)
Direct Operating Expense
InterneUWebsite
Consulting Fees
Insurance
Office Supplies
Telephone/Fax
Postage
Printing/copying
(Postcards/Newsletters)
Office Rent
Total Direct Operating Expense
Direct Program Expense
Trade Shows
( 2 shows with IEFC)
Membership/Dues
FAM Tours/Scouting
Production Guide
Total Prograrn Expense
Total Film Council Expenses
Film Festival Sponsorship for
City of Temecula
$59,900.00
Unknown at this tirne
TOTAL REVENUE $ 59,900.00
$ 8500.00
$2500.00
none
$1000.00
$1200.00
$1200.00
$1500.00
$5000.00
free
$12,400.00
$1000.00
$ 500.00
$1000.00
$6500.00
$ 9000.00
$29,900.00
$30,00000
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $59,900.00
r~ V~F~Cowml
~~~~~IE~~ ~lAN
2<<>>OOo200~
"The purpose of the Temecula Valley Film Council is to attract
and facilitate location production in the Temecula Valley by
acting as a liaison between the film industry and the community.
By actively see~ing filming, video production, and still
photography, direct economic benefit will be generated to the
area through location fees and the purchase of goods, services
and labor. Residual tourism benefits will arise from area
eltposure in film, television and print"
The T emecula Valley Film Council has become a viable commerce producing entity
in the T emecula area, and because of its success, stronger support for future
expansion is needed. The Inland Empire Film Commission is reporting sizable
growth in the their service requests and is referring many of these requests to
Temecula. We are seeing the production end of the business moving out of Los
Angeles and looking for healthier, more cost-effective environments such as
Temecula. Computerization in the film industry is creating new companies, and
technology is allowing them to look for new homes outside the Los
Angeles/Hollywood area. Through our presence at trade shows and our year round
marketing efforts, we can attract these businesses to our area.
We have been in existence for eight years, Once again, in cooperation with the Arts
Council and Arts Fest 2000, we are producing the 11th Annual Talent Showcase and
will continue our support of the City of T emecula's Tourism and Marketing programs
and the Cultural Arts Plan. Per our agreement with the City, the T emecula Valley
Film Council will no longer be responsible for the production of the T emecula Valley
International Film Festival, but in a cooperative effort, we are working with Cinema
Entertainment Alliance to facilitate the production of the Temecula Valley
International Film Festival 2000.
r~V~F~C~
Page 2
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
o Maintain at least a part-time Program Coordinator to manage the Temecula
Valley Film Council, which will provide a focal point for film related activities.
o Respond to location requests from production companies and/or the Inland
Empire Film Commission
o Assist with location scouting when requested by the Production Company and/or
the Inland Empire Film Commission,
o Maintain a location library (including digital files); provide location images to the
industry upon request, including Email requests.
o Update and maintain ,on an on going, basis the Temecula Valley Film Production
Guide.
o Market the Temecula Valley at industry trade shows including Temecula
organizations such as the hotels/resorts, Film Festival and Chamber of
Commerce /Tourism representatives.
o Maintain the website for the Film Council and establish important internet links.
o Actively support the efforts of the organizers of the 2000 and 2001 T emecula
Valley International Film Festival. These efforts will include but are not limited to
the use of volunteers and providing speakers on behalf of the Film Festival for
community organizations and groups within the Temecula Valley.
o Encourage the establishment of film related businesses in Temecula.
o Develop a core of film industry related production companies in the T emecula
Valley area for referral and as examples of successful local industry business
(EDC).
o Host a series of educational seminars for the purpose of educating the
community to the benefits of film production, how to become involved in the
industry locally, career opportunities, etc.
r ~ v~ F~ COWIIiil
Page 3
Recap of TVFC Accomplishments FY'gg.OO
o Eclipse Productions called looking for "migrant farmer" type houses. Their exact
needs were outlined on their Internet website. Included in the website were
photographs of possible locations they had found with an explanation of what
was needed to make them the perfect film site. Area photos were taken (mostly
on the eastside behind the vineyards) and Sunny Thomas met with their location
scout to take her to the properties.
o NBC Olympics for television filmed interviews in T emecula. They called to get an
idea of some interesting locations to film in the city. Digital photographs were
taken of the wineries (Callaway, Thornton & Maurice Carrie) and Old Town (the
Church, the murals at the bus station & the archways). Location photos were
sent by Email and then followed by hard copies.
o Locations were scouted for 10 days for the shooting of "3000 Miles" to begin
September 1, 1999. These filmmakers were participants in the 1999 Temecula
International Film Festival and came to find locations in Temecula as a direct
result. With assistance from the Film Council, City Staff and Mayor Ford, the
locations scout has been able to convince the filmmaker that everything he
needed could be found or created in the Temecula area. There was to be a
production crew of 25 people staying in Temecula for 28 days of filming. This
was an independent film with a budget of $500,000. Most local cities, merchants
and residents have been very cooperative and accommodating. Production on
"3000 Miles" has been shelved due to financing. There was a distant hope that
when they have new financing, they would come back to Temecula, There were
4 scenes including a casino, and 2 airports that were set for this area.
o The Inland Empire Film Commission forwarded requests for property ownership
information for the De Luz/Santa Rosa Plateau area to this office. With help from
Rancon realtors and their files, we were able to provide the information needed.
o TVFC received location requests for green grassy fields, old wooden barns, and
working cattle or horse ranches. In all cases we were able to meet with the
location scout and to provide the needed photo opportunities
r ~ v~ F~ COWIIJD11
Page 4
o The locations manager for a new John Travolta movie came to Temecula looking
for a street with eastern style houses with porches and non-California trees. The
plan was to close the street for three days and snow in the whole area. Photos
were taken, and he returned to the studio. Follow up indicated that Temecula
was not the right location.
o We were contacted by DensuTech, a marketing firm for Japanese automobiles,
to supply several on road photo locations - roads by a river, by a lake, straight
roads, winding roads, in mountains, by cliffs and over a bridge. New photos were
taken and sent to DensuTech. Photo shoot will be in Spring 2000.
o IEEP Film Commission referred a request for a two-story deserted or seemingly
deserted farmhouse. Possible photo locations were faxed at their request.
o The City of T emecula forwarded a request for permitting and fee information to
the TVFC. Stacy Sievek worked with the production people to meet their needs,
o E! Entertainment called requesting shirts and hats from the Temecula Film
Festival to be worn on a future show about film festivals. Jo Moulton was able to
fill their needs.
o MTV requested help in finding 25 local young people (over 18) to help with a
segment of their new show "Senseless Acts of Video" which reenacts exciting
and exceptional portions of music videos. This segment was a helium balloon
airlift. The filming took place locally, using the young people to fill the balloons
and in a crowd scene as the balloons took off, stuntmen in tow.
o Photographer, Christopher Stoneman, requested referrals for local makeup
persons. He was given four referrals and was pleased to get our help.
o We are collecting video clips of movies filmed in the T emecula area for the Inland
Empire Tourism Council's upcoming marketing presentation. A copy of
"Weekend in the Country", filmed in Temecula and co-staring many Temecula
residents including Mayor Jeff Stone, was purchased to use in the Inland Empire
Tourism Council's upcoming marketing presentation and for TVFC files. Three
other locally filmed videos are also being acquired for our files.
r~v~r~c~
Page 5
o TVFC was contacted by Eddie Hunt, who was looking for a warehouse to rent for
interior filming. Stacy Sievek met with Mr. Hunt and was able to find a Temecula
warehouse. Hunt's movie, "In My Blood", filmed in Temecula for 5 days in
February - the budget is $1000 a day.
o TVFC received a request for permitting information on night filming on the
Overland Bridge. As this is a new venue, we are working with the City's Planning
Department to develop new guidelines.
o 2 one-day shoots for commercials were completed, Both shoots were conducted
on private property.
o 2 days of commercials were shot in the Circuit City store at the Promenade mall
by Propaganda Productions.
o Jeena Ryan a local video photographer will be contacting the City to produce a
video on Temecula. She has just finished a video on Palm Springs for their
Visitors Bureau.
o The TVFC has hired a part time Production Coordinator to answer calls and
coordinate location and filming requests.
o The update and reprint of the Production Guide will be completed by June 2000.
o The TVFC website will be completed by the end of June with additional location
sites be added each month.
o With the purchase of a computer with a rewritable CD-Rom, we are now able to
build, maintain and store our locations library for easy access.
r~v~r~c~
Page 6
MARKETING
A. Support production of the Sixth Annual Temecula Valley International
Film Festival.
B. Temecula Valley Film Council website (to be open in June 2000)
maintenance and linkage to local, state, national and international
location film libraries and users.
C. Trade Show and Film Festival attendance and participation,
Show Biz Expo (Temecula Booth), AFCI-Locations 2000 & 2001 (with
IEFC), Technical Expo, Palm Springs Film Festival, Hollywood Film
Festival and any other geographically suitable expos or festivals.
D. Participation and membership in the Association of Film
Commissioners International.
E. Develop public awareness.
Encourage Temecula Valley community involvement in both Film
Council promotions and Film Festival attendance through seminars,
press releases and a speakers bureau.
OUTREACH
A. Annual Regional PHOTO CONTEST/EXHIBIT (May 2000 and 2001).
In cooperation with local photography clubs and classes and with local
sponsorship, our intent is to encourage location still photography in the
Temecula area, exhibit it to the public, reward the participants and
replenish the Film Council's locations photo library (negatives and
images become the property of the Film Council).
B. Production of Talent Showcases 2000 and 2001 in cooperation with
the Arts Council and Arts Festival.
r~V~F~C~
Page 7
C. Expanded Temecula area FAM tours in cooperation with the Inland
Empire Film Commission and Tourism Council.
Location scouts, producers, directors, cinematographers, writers,
magazine editors and photographers and supporting staff will be taken
on tours to explore the Temecula area and possible location sites for
film, television and commercial productions.
D. Encourage film industry related businesses in the Temecula Valley in
cooperation with the EDC and the City.
E. Sponsor educational workshops about industry related issues.
"What do I do when a film company wants to use my property?" "I want
to make a movie, Now what should I do?" What is a Film Festival and
why should I care?"
OPERATIONS
A. Expand and maintain Locations Photo Library.
Increase still photo and video library and expand to include digital
library.
B. Update and maintain the Film Production Guide.
This is an on going project to include all current businesses.
C. Increase public awareness and support of the Film Council.
Press releases, promotions and educational materials will be
distributed through newspapers, magazines, trade journals, radio,
cable TV and the Internet.
D. Develop committees and volunteer groups for year round activities and
festival support.
E. Publicize the T emecula area within the context of filmmaking activities
and the opportunities and benefits presented to local merchants,
businesses and local media support services through the production of
a newsletter. Continue cooperation with the Arts Council and establish
the role of the Film Council in T emecula's Cultural Arts Plan,
,
r~v~rikC~
Page 8
F. Daily management of filmmakers' requests, and production and
support service information to the industry, Ongoing education for
local merchants of filmmaking opportunities.
G. Promote relocation of film crews and film companies to the area to
generate film activity and new jobs.
GOALS
1. Generate higher awareness of the T emecula area by targeting
production companies through professional mailing materials,
attendance at trade shows and film festivals, participation in industry
organizations.
2. Support production of the annual Film Festival.
3. Generate operating income through fund raising events such as the
Talent Showcase, "Shoot Temecula" Photo Contest, ad sales in the
Production Guide and community support.
4. Design and implement tracking systems for production and budgetary
controls with the help of the IEFC.
With our recognized presence in the extremely competitive market of film production
and the expanding numbers of film commissions world wide, the Temecula Valley
Film Council has dedicated itself to the continuation of a high level of professionalism
in providing its services to the T emecula area.
CITYITEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL OPERATING AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT 3B
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
This Agreement, made in triplicate, this 11th day of July, 2000, by and between the CITY
OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of
the laws of the State of California, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the TEMECULA
VALLEY FILM COUNCIL, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "TVFC")
with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct:
1. Recitals. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement is entered into with
respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct.
A. The City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a desirable,
cooperative, efficient and multi-faceted location destination for the film, television and
advertising industry and disseminating information relative to the various activities of City of
Temecula ("City") and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, and business interests.
B. The TVFC has special knowledge, experience and facilities for
disseminating information; and is organized for and equipped to carry on promotional activities
on behalf of the City; and to publicize and exploit its advantages.
C. Such activities are recognized by law as being in the public interest and
servicing a public purpose.
2. Responsibilities of TVFC. TVFC shall undertake, during the 2000-01 fiscal year,
to carry on promotional activities on behalf of the City; and to particularly render the following
services.
A. MARKETING
1. Support production of the Sixth Annual T emecula Valley
International Film Festival.
2. TVFC website maintenance and linkage to local, state, national
and international location film libraries and users.
3. Trade Show and Film Festival attendance:
Show Biz Expo (Temecula booth), AFCI-Locations 2000 & 2001
(with IEFC), Technical Expo, Palm Springs Film Festival, Hollywood Film Festival and any other
geographically suitable expos or festivals.
4. Participation and membership in the Association of Film
Commissioners International.
5. Develop public awareness. Encourage Temecula Valley
community involvement in both Film Council promotions and Film Festival attendance through
press releases and a speaker's bureau.
\\TEMEC ]SIOlWOL1\Depts\CITYMGR\ Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\Fihn Agree OO.doc
1
B. OUTREACH:
1. Regional Photo ContestlExhibit.
In cooperation with local photography clubs and classes and with local sponsorship, IEFC's
intent is to encourage location still photography in the Temecula area, exhibit to the public,
reward the participants and replenish the IEFC's locations photo library.
2. Production of Talent Showcases '00 and '01 in cooperation with
the Arts Council and Arts Festival.
3. Expand Temecula area FAM tours in cooperation with the Inland
Empire Film Commission and Tourism Council.
4. Encourage film industry related businesses in the Temecula
Valley in cooperation with the EDC and the City.
5. Sponsor educational workshops about industry related issues.
Possible topics include: "What do 1 do when a film company wants to use my property?" "I want
to make a movie. Now what should I do?" 'What is a Film Festival and why should I care?"
C. OPERATIONS:
1. Update and maintain Film Production Guide
2. Expand and maintain Locations Photo Library
Increase still photo and video library and expand to include digital library.
3. Increase public awareness and support of the Film Council.
Press releases, promotions and educational materials will be distributed through newspapers,
magazines, trade journals, radio and cable TV and the internet.
4. Develop committees and volunteer groups for year round activities
and festival support.
5. Publicize the Temecula area within the context of filmmaking
activities and the opportunities and benefits presented to local merchants, businesses and local
media support services through the production of a newsletter. Continue cooperation with the
Arts Council and establish the role of the Film Council in Temecula's Cultural Arts Plan.
6. Daily management of filmmakers' requests, and production and
support service information to the industry. Ongoing education for local merchants of
filmmaking opportunities.
7. Promote relocation of film crews and film companies to the area to
generate film activity and new jobs.
3. Payment to TVFC.
A. In consideration of the services to be performed by the TVFC for the
CITY, as set forth in paragraph 2 hereof, the CITY hereby agrees to allocate $29,000 to fund the
\\TEMEC 18 101\VOLl\Depts\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Sponsored Evenlll\FiIm Agree OO.doc
2
TVFC which will be dispersed for the fiscal year of 2000-2001, payable on execution of this
Agreement.
B. In the event the City should desire any additional service, TVFC shall,
upon request of the City, furnish a proposal including, an itemized statement of the estimated
cost thereof, and the City may modify or alter the proposal, or may reject the proposal in its
entirety at its sole discretion, or may direct the submission of a new proposal which may be
accepted, altered or rejected. Upon the final approval of any such proposal and execution
thereof, by TVFC and the City, as herein provided, City will pay to TVFC the cost thereof, and
TVFC shall perform the services set forth in the proposal. All money due for carrying out said
plan or proposal shall be supported by a detailed statement of TVFC showing the basis of said
claims, and certified by proper officers of TVFC. TVFC shall not be entitled to receive any
compensation for its services or usual expenses except by this agreement.
4. Monthlv Report. The Executive Director of the TVFC shall prepare and submit to
the City Manager and Assistant City Manager a monthly written report specifying the activities of
the TVFC. Said report will include but is not limited to contacts made upcoming events and
current TVFC activities.
5. Indemnification. TVFC agrees that it will defend, indemnify, protect and hold the
City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from all claims
for damage to persons or property by reason of TVFC's acts or omissions of those of TVFC's
employees, officers, agents or invites in connection with their services rendered hereunder to
the maximum extent allowed by law.
6. Insurance. TVFC shall secure from a good and responsible company or
companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force
and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers;
compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City is the named insured or is
named as an additional insured with the TVFC and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability
Insurance to the City Manager before execution of this Agreement by the Agency.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement
attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall:
A. Include the City of Temecula, its elected officials, officers, agents and
employees as the insurers or named as additional insurers covering the services to be
performed under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with, this
Agreement.
B. Provide the following minimum limits:
1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per
accident
for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers'
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers'
Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
\\TEMEC _FS lOl\VOL1\Dep1s\CITYMGR\Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\FiIm Agree OO.doc
3
C. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City,
its officers, officials, agents and employees for losses arising from work performed by the TVFC
for the City.
D. Bear and endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is
provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason
whatsoever the City of Temecula shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return
receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before date of expiration of cancellation is
effective.
E. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and
approved by the City of Temecula. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects to the City, its officers, officials,
agents and employees; or the City shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and
related investigation claim administration and defense expenses.
7. Attornev's Fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto
concerning the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be
entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
8. Term. This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year commending July 1,
2000, and terminating June 30, 2001.
9. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written
notice and if terminated, TVFC shall pay to the City that portion of the fee, which has not
actually been expended on the work described in Attachment 3.
\\TEMEC _FS lOl\VOL1\Depts\CITYMGR.\Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\FiIm Agree OO.doc
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above.
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
CITY OF TEMECULA
Maggie Allen, Executive Director
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, Agency Attorney
\\TEMEC _FSI01\ VOLl\Depts\CITYMGR\ Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\FiIm Agree OO.doc
5
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP FUNDING REQUEST
ATTACHMENT4A
DIVISIONS:
Regional
Economic
Development
Inland Empire
Small Business
Development
Center
Inland Empire
Film Commission
Inland Empire
Tourism Council
Inland Empire
Economic
Investment
Collaborative
Inland Empire
Technology
Development
\\ P'
~b:
~~~='
RECEIVED
APR 4 - ZC[}JJ
April 4, 2000
Mr. Jim O'Grady
City of Ternecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
Dear Jim:
Enclosed is the City of Temecula's request for JEEP/Community Partners continued
participation for 2000/2001, along with our 1999 Annual Report. By multiplying your
January 1, 1999 population figure of 48,850 by IEEP's per capita membership rate of
.26, total cost of membership for 2000 is $12,701. This is payable July 1, 2000. At
this time I do not foresee any changes to last year's contract.
As you know, the Inland Empire Economic Partnership remains focused on its most
comprehensive and ambitious economic development program to date! Existing
programs are continually expanded, and new programs have been added.
The 1999 Marketina Plan was aggressively implemented last year, and the 2000
version has begun in earnest. Requests for information and assistance from
relocatina companies jumped considerably during the past year, and they are
expected to increase even more in 2000. Our hiah-tech program continues to offer
support to existing and new high-tech companies wishing to expand in the region.
Through the Government Affairs Committee, our efforts continue at insuring that our
state and federal legislators are aware of and focused on the issues affecting the
Inland Empire business community. Our Film Commission continues to bring
production companies to the Inland Empire for feature films and commercials,
positively impacting the economy of the region. During 1999, the acquisition of the
Tourism Council was finalized and w:!re working to increase its financial strength
and implement a consumer carnpaigt Additional programs are also underway!
Please let me know if ~ou need any additional information. I will look forward to
seeing you on April 17 .
~"re/\Jy/
ftdLs
PresidenVCEO
Enclosures
301 East Vanderbilt Way, Suire 100 . San Bernardino, California 92408
Phone: 909-890-10900 Fax: 909-890-1088 0 E-Mail: info@ieep.com 0 Internet: www.ieep.com
~
\)
.J
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP
)
Ailllilll1l1laill ~ ce IP CO) fLU:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA'S LOCATION FOR INNOVATION
By Bruce Varner, 1999 Chairman of the Board
(>~
<~' ~ j
.,0~
"=~... C>
\ - v--- / .1)
Y-.~;; ~
~{3" '
\X5
,
()
1~~~
'lr'he last year of the 20'" Century was a very good year for the Inland Empire and its
JL economy. The region continued as one of the fastest growing metropolitan areas in
the nation with unemployment at all time lows. Many local and existing businesses
completed or announced expansion plans and new businesses established locations in
the region. Our colleges and universities continued to grow and broaden their
educational, cultural and economic impact on our communities with new and innovative
curricula and programs.
The iEEP with its unique membership representing the public and private leaders of the
region had a major part in each of these developments, which are discussed in more detail
elsewhere in this Annual Report. Thanks to the outstanding efforts of the IEEP staff guided by President and Chief
Executive Officer Teri Oorns, the Board of Directors, Executive Committee and Committee Chairs, the IEEP successfully
concluded each of its designated goals for the year.
Yet with the new century our region faces many challenges, particularly in blending population and business growth with
the creation of more higher paying jobs in such areas as the high tech, engineering, manufacturing, biotechnical and
professional fields, so the graduates from our colleges and universities have the appropriate opportunities to stay and
work in the region. As can be seen from this report, the IEEP anticipated these challenges and sometime ago instituted
a number of programs to improve and develop the region's work force. With these and its other programs the IEEP is
well suited to continue its vital role in improving both the economy and the quality of life for each citizen of the region.
I have been honored to serve as Chairman of the Board during 1999. My grateful appreciation is extended to the staff
and especially all of the members of the Executive Committee, the Board of Directors and the Committee Chairs for their
unselfish contribution of time and effort to the IEEP programs and activities, and with such dedicated efforts the IEEP is
certain to have continued success in the 21" Century.
I~~~
(r~J
It . . '"<"'
~:,~:.~..,i; ~.,"',
.)~? -
~. Q' '.:'
~
By Robert Robie, 2000 Chairman of the Board
'\\ ~ Te enter the new millennium with excitement and optimism for the future of the
V V Inland Empire and the role of the IEEP in the continued growth and prosperity of
the region. The organization has matured at a very rapid pace over the past several
years and now represents an economic development corporation which is nationally
and internationally recognized for its accomplishments and quality.
We have articulated four major objectives for 2000 and the officers and staff are
dedicated to the attainment of these goals, specifically:
. Imolernentation of the Internal Reoroanization of the IEEP
The organizational structure has been reorganized to reduce from ten to five the direct reports to Teri Ooms. The
benefits of the revised organization will allow Teri to devote her energies to the continued achievement of the mission of
the IEEP and the creation of five vice presidents reporting directly to Teri.
. Private Sector Mernbershio Develooment
The IEEP has been fortunate to have the support of a significant portion of the private sector businesses in the two
counties and we believe that further development of the private sector will add to the continuing maturity of the
organization, thereby resulting in accelerated returns to our two-county service area. We have recently hired Dianna
Carney Skeens to fill the position of Vice President, Membership Development. We ask that each of our members assist
her wherever possible to achieve her goals and the goals of the IEEP.
. Workforce Develoornent
Retaining and creating jobs in the Inland Empire is a critical function of the IEEP. We are dedicated in 2000 to
implement and begin operation of a special workforce development group consisting of a collaborative of the
manufacturing, education and economic development arms of our membership.
. Government Affairs
The IEEP, as the region's independent representative, has and will continue, on an accelerated basis, to serve as the
appropriate forum for effective dialog between business and government on issues of importance.
i am very enthusiastic about the iEEP and what we, as a partnership of the public and private sectors, can accomplish
for the Inland Empire in 2000 and beyond.
)
)1 o~ fJJiikJftJ1J ~ ~ (J}w; rii~_~~,:~S~c
By Teri Oorns, President and CEO
As investors in IEEP, I believe that you will see that it has been a very productive
year and that your investment in our region is making a difference. IEEP's
economic impact to the community is estimated in excess of $300 rniliion. This is
investment made by attractions and by support to existing companies. There are no
multipliers in effect here! These are the raw numbers. This does not include annual
payroll and tax statistics that these companies will generate for years to come.
As a company, IEEP is strong and stable. We have a solid base of membership, a
strong staff and operate on a very stable financial basis and within budgetary
guidelines.
We face the same challenges as other businesses in finding qualified people to meet
our growing demands, being able to pay wages competitive with other employers,
responding to the regulatory environment.
As a region, we had a very exciting year marketing our area globally through print ads,
tradeshows and prospect missions. The Inland Empire has had some great exposure in
the western European biotech community. We face challenges as a region as well. We
face the lack of awareness and image issues and on a broader scale the stigma of
being California. In 2000, we will carry the messages of businesses from around the
world to the State and our elected officials about the problems companies have about
locating in California. The majority of our lost successes in 1 999 had to do with
state regulatory issues.
We are increasing our education and workforce development programs in 2000 to meet
1) the demands of existing businesses, to make us stand out in business attraction and to
prepare the workforce for the future.
We are stepping up our membership development activities to increase private sector
support of IEEP. The demands on the organization are increasing at the request of our
membership to further prepare our region for the massive growth we will experience
over the next 20 years. The IEEP can and will respond, but we need to be able to meet
the staffing and program demands and therefore increase our operating budget to
achieve the goals established by the membership.
IEEP will bolster its marketing efforts to increase our visibility globally. We are launch-
ing some new products and enhancing existing ones. In 2000, our CD-ROM Fact Book
will have live video of all our Community Partners.
In 1999, we were treated to one of the best complements ever - four new communities
joined IEEP because of our success at regional marketing and business development.
We are succeeding In pulling our region together as we welcome communities from the
Coachella Valley and the Morongo Basin. We also welcome 17 new private sector
members to IEEP.
Thank you to those long time members and to our new supporters. On behalf of all of
us on staff at IEEP, we appreciate your support and look forward to another successful
partnership in 20001
~\
p
"The demands on
the organization
are increasing at
the request of our
membership to
further prepare
our region for the
massive growth
we will experience
over the next 20
"
years.
'I:l. \ '-
/,*,^-g~
.'L.\\I> ~:.\II'IRt: FC()~().\UC 1'..\ln~EI(SIIII'
JEEP lV\ISSJON STATElV\ENT
The mission of the Inland Empire Economic Partnership is to attract. create and retain business
in order to increase the regions's growth and economic output. This is acheived by providing
superior service to members. clients and the communities in the Inland Empire. It is supported
by our core values of regional teamwork. marketing focus. financial strength. integrity and
professional excellence.
}J
~ W@JW'!iJv ~
r)
Business Development
The Inland Empire's economic growth trends can be attributed to the many new businesses that relocate to, or
expand within the region every year. Some move to the Inland Empire from other parts of the state, while others
come from other parts of the country and the world. To ensure this success, the Business Development Department at
IEEP maintains a working relationship with site selectors and corporate real estate executives, and produced a record-
setting year in 1999. Our staff fielded 907 inquiries from numerous companies, assisting them with site location
information and research. These efforts have resulted in a total of 17 businesses choosing to expand or relocate to the
Inland Empire. They are:
o Disney (Call Center)
o Superior Essex Wire & Cable
o Lowes
o RPS Incorporated
o Hilton (Call Center)
o Automotive Supply Manufacturer
o Sears Roebuck & Co.
o Star-Kist Foods, Inc./ H.J.Heinz Co.
o Toybox Creations
o Old Dominion Freight Line
o InterMetro
o American lire Disposal
o Poly Pacific Plastics
o Quality Cabinets
o ConAgra
o Concurrent Technologies Corp.
o Lynam Industries
In addition, 2,228 jobs were created or retained during 1999, and the estimated investment in the region is
$220,796,256. Staff fielded 609 inquiries, and processed 78 leads to the Community Partners. Business Development
Staff also participated in several retention efforts, and was instrumental in retaining three businesses,- Lyman Indus-
tries, Automotive Supply Manufacturer, and InterMetro, which decided to expand as well. The staff also hosted 12
business tours of the region's industrial and commercial sites.
Regional i\Jiafl'l<etiD1g
'lrhe IEEP Marketing Division promoted the region's many attributes and advantages through direct mail programs,
JL trade show participation, and advertising campaigns in local and national media, utilizing separate advertisements
for business attraction, retention, and corporate image. A 29-page supplement in Forbes and Forbes Global took the .J)
message of the Inland Empire to some 6 million readers throughout the world, and highlighted several area businesses
and educational institutions. IEEP responded to over 200 individual Forbes inquiries that requested over 800 pieces of
regional information that were distributed by mail. In total, (with the other advertisers in the supplement) there have
been over 2,000 inquiries to date, from eleven different countries.
Re-prints of the Forbes supplement continue to be used as part of IEEP's promotional campaign, in addition to the Inland
Empire Fact Book and Fact Book CD-Rom, which are effective informational and marketing tools for business editors as
well as site selection and corporate real estate consultants. IEEP also supported an Inland Empire segment in a haif-
hour television show called "Strategic Business Report" which aired 28 times in markets throughout the United States.
The IE Review, a two-color direct mail piece was distributed to an international listing of targets, one of five direct mail
efforts carried out in 1999. IEEP representatives also conducted five prospect missions and participated in eight trade
shows nationally and internationally.
Investor Relations
As the region's only private, non-profit economic development organization, the IEEP membership is comprised of
over 150 businesses and institutions, 20 cities and two counties. The IEEP Investor Relations Division had an
extremely successful year in 1999, attracting 21 new members into the Partnership. It continued its tradition of providing
the membership with quality events and numerous networking opportunities. IEEP Investor Relations also maintains
outreach efforts in the form of The Clipboard, a monthly newsletter, the Quarterly Economic Report, and a web site on
the Internet. The IEEP is proud to welcomes our new members from 1999:
o Salomon Smith Barney
o California Trade & Commerce Agency
o Town of Yucca Valley
o City of Twentynine Palms
o University of Phoenix
o Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)
o Raincross Medical Group.
o Software Council of Southern California
o KVCR-TV
o Ultimate Internet Access
o Matich Corporation
o E.L. Yeager Construction
o City of Palm Springs
o City of La Quinta
o Altek Media Group
o GE Capital Mortgage Services. Inc.
o United Parcel Service
o Los Angeles Times
o Children's Fund
o Alvarez Lincoln/Mercury
o PS Realty, Incl Bond & Associates
)
III'1I~and lEmpira Tourism COUlI'1Icil
Tourism continues to attract visitors from throughout the state and country, and the Inland Empire Tourism Council
(IETC) continues to increase efforts to promote the two-county region as a tounst destination. As a leading source
)of revenue for the region, tourism accounts for over five billion dollars annually. In addition to promoting the many
recreational choices offered in the area's lakes, mountains and deserts, the IETC added a 'Trout Tournament Series' in
1999, which attracted 200-400 participants at each of several events during the year. The IETC is also producing its
first-ever Regional Visitor Guide "Destination for Recreation," and continues to maintain visibility in the California Travel
Planners' Guide 2000, Sunset magazine and the Los Angeles Times. In addition, Staff conducted 43 industry outreach
events including trade shows and direct mail campaigns.
Smalll8llAsinass lOiavalopman~ Cani:ar
The development of entrepreneurial success is another component of business growth in the region. The Inland
Empire Small Business Development Center (IESBDC) had another record-setting year, and currently provides the
largest program of its kind in the state. To better meet client needs, they have expanded several key offerings such as
government procurement assistance and bilingual training. During the course of 1999, the IESBDC presented 160
workshops, lectures and other business education events, which attracted some 2,490 attendees. The IESBDC was
also host to SBA Awards Luncheon in May and the Diamond Venture Forum in October, which featured presentations by
several high-tech companies seeking exposure and venture funding. An outreach office was established in Upland, the
seventh such facility in the region. As a result of IESBDC's business training and consulting, 279 new jobs were created,
and 246 were retained, with an estimated investment of $41 ,012,885.
Ini:arnai:ional Trada
Also housed in the IESBDC's Riverside office is the Inland Empire International Trade Center (lET) which had its most
successful year ever. The lET assisted numerous clients with matters ranging from the basics of exporting, logistics
and product classification, to marketing, trade leads, and financing. In 1999 the IETC assisted in 23 export transactions,
representing $17,937,407.
IlI'1Ilall'1ld lEmpira !Film Commissioll'1l
1\ The Inland Empire Film Commission posted another "banner year," successfully hosting over 800 various productions
,!) for TV, magazine and film. Referred to as "Hollywood's Largest Backlot," the Inland Empire provides movie produc-
ers and location managers with a multitude of diverse film locations and environments that effectively double as other
parts of the country and the world. A report released in August by the Motion Picture Association of America found that
the economic impact of entertainment production in the Inland Empire is over $105 million per year (using 1996 data). In
addition, the Inland Empire hosts more film production than any two-county region in the state except Los Angelesl
Ventura, and is fourth in the nation in production totals.
In 1999, the Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) staff fielded 1,662 requests for location information, and permits
were processed for 37 feature films, 18 television shows, 205 commercials, 270 still shots for magazines and catalogs,
31 student films, 69 documentaries or industrial videos, and 14 music videos. Feature films shot in the region included
"Play it to the Bone," "Space Cowboys," "Magnolia," "Erin Brockovich," and "Dinosaur," the most sophisticated animated
feature produced to date by Disney, to be released on Memorial Day weekend. The 800-plus productions in 1999
resulted in an estimated total impact of $ 62,221,500 to the Inland Empire.
The IEFC worked closely with the Bureau of Land Management, and will soon open 14 new areas of the high desert to
filming activity. They also partnered with ESRI and their state-of-the-art mapping software, to produce a destination-to-
destination real time mapping system for location crews. The IEFC produced the 5'h annual California "On Location"
Awards in Hollywood, to recognize professionalism and integrity among location professionals and production compa-
nies. The event received coverage in The Hollywood Reporter.
High Tachnology
By way of an extensive study of the existing technology-related companies throughout the region, the Inland Empire
High Technology Program (IE21) developed a database to identify emerging industry clusters, from which a directory
will soon be formulated. A feasibility study, including a needs-assessment survey. was then conducted to determine
industry concerns and opportunities. This survey evaluated areas such as: technology development and deployment;
access to capital; tax and fiscal policy; education; regulatory issues; workforce availability; and inter-company network-
ing. The study identified numerous emerging clusters in the region, including computer systems design, electronic and
computer product manufacturing, aerospace products, medical equipment and supplies, software publishers, information
} services. engineering firms, and data processing.
Other accomplishments included the awarding of $80.000 in financial impact, the retention of 10 high tech jobs; the
attraction of a high tech management company from outside the region which brought with it 2 new jobs with potential for
many more, and the addition of 5 high-tech incubator tenants. IEEP also organized a region-wide ad hoc committee on
telecommunications infrastructure to help shape telecommunications policy and legislation.
Inlano1lEmpire Economoc Inves1ment Collabora1ove
The Inland Empire Economic Investment Collaborative (IEEIC), committed to ensuring that area companies have
access to a skilled and well-prepared workforce, brings together leaders from business, education, social services
and economic development to better identify the region's workforce and training needs. The Collaborative's mission is to )
"facilitate, support, and promote the Inland Empire as a globally-competitive region." It carries out its mission through
grant programs and services and has awarded $84,741 in grants for innovative programming and teaching techniques in
low-performing K-12 schools. IEEIC also continues its successful Career Club programs at Riverside Community
College and College of the Desert, and has awarded grants to 30 individuals with significant barriers to employment.
In the first year of a three-year plan, the IEEIC has developed a policy consensus, giving each region's workforce
development agencies, community colleges, welfare-to-work programs, and K-12 educational agencies an equal voice in
the creation of a functioning partnership. The IEEIC also implemented an '800' phone number to enabie job-seekers to
access the employment and training resources of the region, and to link them with employers, educators and training
providers.
Making Success Siol1"ies Every Day
Business dreams do become realities, thanks to the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC), with
10 branch offices throughout the Inland Empire. The IESBDC provides expertise and education to numerous
entrepreneurs from the region on an annual basis. Here's a look at just some of the former SBDC clients who emerged
as business successes in 1999.
Now in his 28'h year in the plastics industry, Robert Forr is, for the first time, the president of his own company, Poly
Mold Containers. He embarked on his objective of company ownership by attending a two-hour small business
planning seminar at the SBDC. In just four weeks he finished his first draft of a business plan, and shortly thereafter he
was successful in obtaining a $200,000 loan from the Bank of Orange County. He has since added a fourth and fifth
production line, as the business continues to grow.
Sharlyn Spates, owner of Hawaiian Popcorn, first made contact with the Riverside SBDC in 1997, after she and her
family spent countless weekends popping and selling kettle corn at fairs and community events throughout Southern
California. After working with SBDC business consultants on pricing, planning, accounting and marketing, Ms. Spates
received $130,000 from a private investor, and is on track to one day make Hawaiian Popcorn a national and
international product.
.2)
The SBDC's High Desert office provided Jasmine Sabu and her partner Kenny Kidd with the business knowledge to
operate Stockman's Station, a successful livestock brokering business. Kidd had worked extensively in ranching and
livestock in Oklahoma, and the two took notice of the growing demand in ethnic communities and restaurants for
premium goat and sheep meat. After nine months in business, Sabu attended the SBDC's High Desert office in
Victorville to learn how to refine a business plan and to compete for funding. They were successful in obtaining a
$175,000 small business loan
David Dunbar, owner of Bolt Master, Inc., recently started a business that manufactures and distributes a broken bolt
extractor he has invented and patented. Strong acceptance of the product at the marketplace required additional capital,
but only after he developed a written business plan to include in the loan package. With a business plan and financial
projections, and a bit of guidance from the Coachella Valley SBDC in Palm Springs, Mr Dunbar's loan request for
$81,500 was approved and funded.
Kelly Space & Technology, a start-up company located at the Inland Empire Business Incubator, hopes to one day
compete with satellite-launching companies the size of Boeing and Lockheed-Martin. Having proven their initial
objective with a federal Business Innovative Research Grant, and a state Technology investment Leadership Grant, Kelly
Space took advantage of match funding available through the Business Incubator, in exchange for an equity stake in the
company.
Posting record numbers in 1999 was the Inland Empire International Trade Center (lET), which assisted several
companies in their efforts to establish a program of trade within the international arena. Solid State Stamping (SSS), a
manufacturer of electronic contacts and sensors for the auto industry since 1977, sought assistance from the lET in the
basics of exporting, logistics and product classification. SSS has since built an alliance with a German company and
obtained rights to manufacture and sell parts in the amount of $2 million.
lET also assisted Precision Transducer Systems (PTS), a manufacturer of home theater entertainment. PTS
approached the IEITC for assistance in marketing their product in Mexico and Latin America, and have since made their
initial shipment of product to a new distributor in Mexico. Mr. William De La Rosa, PTS owner, benefited from assistance "'\
in logistics, exporting, product classification, and methods of payment assistance. -c9
These are just a few illustrations of local residents who have benefited from the many workshops and seminars offered
by the Small Business Development Center and it's affiliated offices.
I O~~rtfJ[@~
)
1999 Activity Report
Companies that located
- Economic Impact: $220,796,256-
in the Inland Empire New Hires
Lowes ................ ............................................................................................... ................... 600
Sears .................... ...................................................................................... ...... ................... 230
Hilton Call Center............................ .............................................. ................ ...... ................ 200
Old Dominion... ............................................................ .................. .......... ...... ...................... 150
Home Depot.................................................................. ............................ ...... ..................... 150
Poly Pacific Plastics .............................................................................................................130
StarkistlHeinz .................................................. ................................................... ..... ............ 100
interMetro ..... .................................................... ......................................... .......................... 1 00
Disney............ ............................................................................................................... ......... 45
Toybox Creations.................................................................................................. ................. 30
Superior Essex Wire & Cable ................................................................................................25
ConAgra .. ........................................................................ .................................. .....................20
Quality Cabinets............................................................................................ ........................20
Automotive Supply Manufacturer ..........................................................................................16
Lynam Industries ............................................................................................... ............. ....... 12
Concurrent Technologies Corp. ...................................................................... ........ .................2
..,
I
,
j
I~~~~
1) .. .---. ------ - .. - ... .. 290
Srnall Business Development Center
Clients Counseled ............................................... 1,756
Counseling Hours ................................................ 7,969
Jobs Retained ......................................................... 246
Jobs Created .......................................................... 279
Training Events Offered ..........................................160
Number of Training Attendees ............................. 2,490
Number of Training Event Hours .......................12,847
IE International Trade ............................... $17,937,407
Total (SBDC & Export Actions Combined) ... $41 ,012,855
ffiUJJrftJ ~
])
Inland Ernpire Film Activity.
Economic Impact ................ $62,221,500
Requests for Locations .................. 1,622
Activity
Features.... ........................................ 37
TV.....................................................18
Commercials ................................... 205
Stills .......... ................................... 270
Music Videos .................................... 14
Documentaries/Industrial Videos ...... 69
279
280
270
260
250
246
240
230
220
Jobs Created
Jobs Retained
..'.\-.'
>'. -.'~
"
." ..~.o,
1999 Film Totals'
Type Days on Location Tota/ Amount Spent
Features 378................................... $26,649,000
Television 55.........................................2,750,000
Commercials 453..................................... 14,722,500
Still and Catalog 629..................................... 12,580,000
Music Video 26............................................ 650,000
Docurnentaries/lndustrial165 ....................................... 4,290,000
Student Production 116..........................................580,000
'prelimlnar/statlstics
~ &1Ji1QJ ~ @j'fJ~
"~ --
,
,.~
'1~
'J
'.
....;,;.
o
Q)!-,
<:0
l> IEEP Staff & Partners
Sharing a social moment are (from left): Sheri Davis, IEFC direcror;
Marv Jane Olhasso, Ontario; Linda Guillis, l'vloreno Valley; and Teri
Ooms, IEEP president and CEO.
j)
o ~ /
""----. "
;, COr:G%
r:, r:1
~Jir1~
"-'.
,
l::.. A time for recognition
Riverside County Supervisors John Tavaglione and Tom
Mullen presenting a resolution at the 1999 IEEP
Annual Dinner.
<I Forbes Magazine and supplement
The May 31 edition of Forbes
Magazine (center) took the message
of the Inland Empire around the
world. The Forbes supplernenr reprint
has proven to be an effective
marketing tool. IEEP Fact books,
newsletters, brochures and CD-
ROMs (right). ~
~'"
~I~
~i!~
~~~ .~P
. ~:. n 'ff'3 "'= .~'t
<I
Trout Tournament Series
IETC staff (below) at tlrsr annual
Trout Tournament Series at Glen
Helen Regional Park. Participant
(left) displays his catch.
.
-
l>
IEEP's Trade Show Booth (above)
conveys our region's many assets. Site
selector tries a putt at lEEP booth
(righr) ar NACORE com'enrion.
,.""'<.....~_. '---.-
. .....,.""",.;.
~ ~' aQjj"";IJ~:~'~
. , " . 'I " ,I' 0
, . I' ,I . . 0:0 01 _'
I~' ~ k~1 cjQ
V~O~ L:" :~
Ea~ J.~ ~
~ ~_s:J ~
Ir. , '.
,
8
-
;.~:::- .~::.::" .::.....
2~:: ,;::;;,:;" .:~~~
'..."" ..~. '....
'.. ".. :~ "
o I
a
o
')
o 'fb_~ ~
~'~~.;~1.~,.3~.
~ ~~ ~.
"- <:> 0
"0 ". & 0
o
~
{baB
. San Bernardino
Forbes Golf Classic (from left) Wayne Hendr~~nd Tim Kelly.
P . 'pants mclude E Martin Matle
artIel . J y aves, r V
C tv SuperVisor err f ea's best goIlers.
oun . d some 0 af
The event attracte
-=-
,~,
V..
j)
o
Q<O
"
~c~.,o
'..'~"
.~. .
~~:'
:;;:: ~ -..;
. Call Center .
HIlton . instructIon
Employees receflv~litv one of
H met an .,
at new e o(its kind
1 three centers
ony V
in the country.
et""'--T .... :....~....
"1 ~',.J;r::;:>:."..,...
I~_, .--:
- '-f'
rOi I" ,,'
I'
./1
~ o~ "<., ~_"
~ .....
'<>" C " 'J .
-~~"~
=,~.,;~l~;:':.~ :~'~.
t>
SBA Awards
Program
SBDC Direcror
Mike Stull with
Stater Bros.
President/CEO
Jack Brown
(right), rhe
keynote speaker
at the SBA
Awards
Program.
t>
Former
IEEP Chairman
Bruce Varner of
Varner, Saleson. &
Dobler chats wlth
business leaders.
<l Regional Filming .
A F d commercial (lar
or 1 al search
left) utilizes a DC
t am and
& rescue e k rumbles
helicopter. A tan
h Southern
throug . "
. . LogIsticS
Cahforma h O\'ie
(1 [)fort em
Airport e t . "Killer
"MOVIe
"The Base.
. " hot in Lucerne
Fhc, s dramatic car
Valley, features
wreck (below).
=~$;,:
=~,,"'~ 9-. ..~
!:
.>,
','_0"1.'':
<;~
~!
\)~l!)"
"i'?~0 ~
A ~"., .,\. '\}
LJI'~
~.
\\t1 .
\')-j~r
-.;r~ .... 0
New ano1lExpanding Businesses
The new and expanded businesses mentioned earlier bring with them their stories of success, as well as their
reasons for relocating, or expanding, in the region. Each of them received professional assistance from IEEP staff in
areas ranging from research and information to site selection. Here are some interesting facts about some of the new )
businesses that planted roots in 1999, as well as others that decided to stay or expand in the Inland Empire.
- The Hilton Worldwide Reservation Call Center is one of just three centers of its kind in the country, and ernpioys
some 220 agents and 15 management staff. They make reservations for all of Hilton's 440 hotels throughout the world,
and handle 10,000 calls per day.
- Poly Pacific International is in the process of relocating its one-of-kind recycled plastic pellet manufacturing facility to
San Bernardino from Canada. It is an environmentally friendly plant which will employ 65 people, with projections to
one-day employ up to 130.
- Sears Roebuck & Co. had evaluated several sites throughout the country for its regional electronic repair facility, and
eventually determined that the Inland Empire was the best possible location.
- InterMetro Industries Corp. made the decision to stay in the Inland Empire after giving thought to leaving the area.
Due to efforts of the IEEP Retention Team, InterMetro actually expanded at its present site by consolidating other
divisions there.
- Old Dominion Freight Line decided to stay in the region after IEEP assisted in finding them a 20-acre site in Rialto for
their new distribution center. Old Dominion will consolidate its administrative and personnel operations to the site after
completing a $9 million expansion.
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc.lHeinz replaced three former warehouse distribution facilities in the state with a new site in
Fontana, from which it will distribute both pet food and canned tuna products. IEEP provided regional site tours, demo-
graphics and other assistance over a two-year period in an effort to assist the firm in meeting its needs.
- Home Depot established a 311,000 sq. ft. western regional distribution center in Ontario, thanks to assistance provided
by the IEEP and the state Trade & Commerce Agency.
- Automotive Supply, an automotive parts manufacturing company also decided to stay in the Inland Empire. It was ~))
able to retain its 73 employees, leased an additional 20,000 square feet, and hired 16 more employees.
- Lowe's Companies, Inc. will soon build a 1.2 million sq. ft. distribution facility in the region, closing escrow on the
project last last year.
Feature Films
A partial list of major productions shot in the Inland Empire in 1999:
"ERIN BROCKOVICH" - Universal Pictures; starring Julia Roberts - filmed in Barstow, Hinkley, Baker
"DINOSAUR" - Walt Disney Productions; Major animated feature; starring Alfre Woodard, Ossle Davis, Max
Casella; filmed in desert areas around Baker, Trona Pinnacles
"PLAY IT TO THE BONE" - Walt Disney; Starring Antonio Banderas, Woody Harrelson - filmed in Barstow,
Baker
"SPACE COWBOYS" - Malpaso Productions, Mad Chance Productions, Warner Bros.; starring Clint Eastwood,
Tommy Lee Jones - filmed at March Air Museum, Victorville, EI Mirage
"SQUELCH" - New Regency Films; Starring Leelee Sobieski, Steve Zahn, Paul Walker - filmed in Redlands
"BOUNCE" - Mira Max; Starring Ben Affleck, Gwyneth Paltrow - filmed in Palm Springs
"BEETHOVEN 3"" - Ludwig Productions; Starring Jamie Marsh, Judge Reinhold, Julia Sweeney - filmed in Big Bear
"MAGNOLIA" - New Line Cinema: Starring Tom Cruise, Julianne Moore, William Macey - filmed at Angeles Oaks area
"BOYS AND GIRLS" - Pounce Productions, Dimension Films, Mira Max Pictures; Starring Freddie Prinzie, Claire
Forlani, Jason Briggs - filmed in Riverside
"BLUE STREAK" - Blue Streak Productions; Starring Martin Lawrence, Luke Wilson, Peter Greene - filmed in Fontana
"ASTRONAUT'S WIFE" - New Line Cinema - Starring Johnny Depp - filmed at March ARB
"PUSHING TIN" - Good Fortune Productions, 20'h Century Fox; Starring Billy Bob Thornton, John Cusack, )
Angelina Jolie - filmed in Victorville
"BOYS FROM MADRID" . Boys and Girls Productions; Starring Theo Pagones - filmed in EI Mirage, Baker
"IMPOSTER" - Mirarnax Pictures - Starring Gary Finise, Madeline Stowe - filmed at Desert Center
~~ -- - .-
~~
~ -
Staternent of Financial Position*
December 31,1999
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 415,981
Accounts Receivable 511,489
Other Assets 25,886
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 953,356
PROPERTY ANO EOUIPMENT
Furniture and Equipment 449.440
less: Accumulated Depreciation t307,6171
NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT 141.823
TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,095,179
LIABILITIES and NET ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 100.841
Other liabilities 51.924
Deferred Revenue 60.000
Pension Contribution payable 53,581
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 266.346
NET ASSETS 828,833
TOTAL LIABILITIES and NET ASSETS $ 1095.179
UNAUOITED
(Based on preliminary numbers and subject to review and audit)
') staternent of Activities'
Year Ended December 31,1999
CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
REVENUESt
Membership Revenue $ 1.610,304
Federal Grant 526,318
State Grant Income 89,076
Cash Match 178.378
Program Income 39,620
Contracts 79.322
Film Commission Revenue 47,361
Other Income 103,664
Interest 7.366
TOTAL REVENUES 2.681,409
EXPENSESt
Salaries and wages 1,297,138
Advertising 336.591
Office Expense 227,824
Facilities 127,148
PayrOll Tax 114,871
Fringe Benefits 104,764
program Expense 18,355
Automobile and Travel 53,384
Contract Labor 120,698
DepreCiation 30,311
Dues and subscriptions 14,560
Education/Conference 51.286
Accounting and Audit 20,268
Meeting Expense 22.336
Other Event Expense 66,579
Community Outreach 10,097
Other Expense 11,526
TOTAL EXPENSES 2.626,736
INCREASE IN NET ASSETS 54,673
) NET ASSETS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 774,160
NET ASSETS AT END OF YEAR $ 828,833
UNAUDITED
.Consolldated Flnanclals tlncludes In-Kind Contributions
(Based on preliminary numbers and subject to review and audit)
Offfilir1f1J ~~:fFt:,]I,-(;,-ci/(,-' 'J
IEEP Officers, January 2000
Robert Robie. Chairman
Arnold Dickson. First Vice.Chairman
George Reyes, Second Vice.Chairman
Sally Anderson. Secretary
W. Augustus Cheatham, Assistant Secretary
Mark Ostolch. Treasurer
Joe Barr. Assistant Treasurer
JEEP Policy Council
Arrowhead Credit Union
Bank of America
Best, Best & Krieger
Cal Poly Pomona
Cal State San Bernardino
Eastern Municipal Water District
Economics & Politics. Inc.
Ernst & Young
Inland Empire Utilities
Agency
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
Moreno Valley
Ontario
The Press.Enterprise
Rancho Cucamonga
Riverside
Riverside County
San Bernardino
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino County Sun
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas Co,
Univ. of Cali!.. Riverside
Watson Laboratories
Wells Fargo Bank
IEEP Membership Roster
EDUCATION Soren. McAdam. Bartells Banning Los Angeles Times
Cal Poly Pomona Southwest Airlines Chino The Press-Enterprise
Cal State San Bernardino Strategic Communications Colton San Bernardino County Sun
Loma Linda University Stoorza. Ziegaus, & Metzger Grand Terrace
Medical Center Swenson Corp. Hemet NON-PROFIT )
Ontario Christian School Talbot Insurance Lake Elsinore Children's Fund
San Bernardino Valley College Temecula Valley Bank La OUlnta Employer's Group
UniverSity 01 California, Riverside Thomas, Bigbie & Smith LomaLinda Inland Valleys Assn. of Realtors
University of Phoenix Ullimate Internet Access. Inc. Moreno Valle'! NAIOP
University of Redlands Union Bank ot California Murrieta Software Council of Southern
Varner. Sales on. & Dobler Norco California
FINANCE/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AlbertA. Webb Associates Ontario So. Cal. HOUSing Dev. Corp
The Allek Group "'/ells Fargo Bank Palm Springs
Arrowhead Credit Union ','Iestern Industrial Management Rancho CUCamG1ga REAL ESTATE / CONSTRUCTION
Associated Engineers. Inc. Rialto William Austin Co.
Bank of America GOVERNMENT / UTILITIES RiverSide Bond & ASSOCiates. Inc.
Bank of Hemet AGRICULTURE / MINING San Bernaralno BrlthineeElectric
Best. Best & Krieger Calitornia Trade & Commerce Agency Temecula C. B. Richard Ellis
Burgess Moving & Storage eastern Municipal Water District Twenlynine Pa:~s Century Crowell Communilies
Burke. Williams. & Sorensen GTE Califomia Town of Yucca \/alley Century 2t LOIS Lauer Realty
BUSiness Bank of Calitornla 'eland Empire Utilities Agency Collins Commercial Corporalion
Citizens BUSiness Bank '1land Valley Development Agency LOGISTICS General DynamiCs Properties
City National Bank eacitic Bell UPS Grubb & EllIS
Community Bank eQmona Valley Transportation AuthOrity Guy Yokom Construction
Community Works Design Group 'iverside County Transportation MANUFACTURING / HIGH TECH Roy O. Huffman Roof Co.
Davis & Graeber Commission Crown Primers Lee & Associates
Economics & Politics. Inc. 33.n Bernardino Associated ESRI Matich CorporallOn
Enterprise Funding Corp. Governments (SAN BAG) Imperial RUDe" :'oducts Pacific Construction Manageme~:
Ernst & Young. LLP ,outhern Calitornla Edison Johnson MaCl,:~ay Penske Corp.
FPC GraphiCS ,outhern California Gas Company Mitsublshl C,-,",t PS Realty. Inc.
First American Title Optivus ie[r~: :~j Rancon Really
G. E. Capital Mortgage Services. Ie; HEALTH CARE RIChmond IOC"'ClOgy E. L. Yeager Construction. Inc.
Geographlcs "land Eye Institute Riverside Sv" 'In & Metal
Gresham. Savage Nolan. & Tilden _Jma Linda UniverSity Medical Center Robertsons :'eel Mix RETAIL / LODGING / ENTERT.
Miller & Schroeder 'omona Valley MedICal Center Watson Lac'C'c::"es Alvarez Lincoln/Mercury
Olivewood Cemetery 'aincross Medical Group Wilden Purr: ~ :ngineering California Speedway
Provident Savings Bank :.'!erside Commumty Hospital Center Chevrolet
Reid & Hellyer ,an Bernardino County Medical Cenler MEDIA Mission Inn
Riverside Personnel SerVice. Inc. The BUSiness :,,3S Ontario Airport Hilton
Robert Hall International COMMUNITY PARTNERS Inland Valle::s . Bulletin Ontario Airport Marnott
Ross. LandIS. & Pauw (local Government) KCXX Rao:o Patton Sales Corp.
Salomon Smilh Barney : lerside County KGGI RadIO San BernardinO Hlllon
Samuel A. Ram<rez & Co. 'in BernardinO County KVCR.TIf
CITY/INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP OPERATING AGREEMENT
ATTACHMENT 4B
llNlLAN][JI EMlPlDRE ECONOMIC lPAlR'fNElRSH][JP
COMMUN]['][1{ lPAlR'fNElRS
MAlRKE'fllNG lPlROGlRAM AGlREEMEN'f
This COMMUNITY PARTNERS MARKETING PROGRAM AGREEMENT
("Agreement") is made and entered into this 11th day of July 2000, by and between the Inland
Empire Economic Partnership, a non-profit mutual benefit corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"IEEP") and the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as "SPONSOR").
lRECITAlLS
WHElREAS, SPONSOR desires to obtain certain marketing services from IEEP
and IEEP desires to provide certain marketing services on behalf of SPONSOR,
WHElREAS, the marketing services to be provided by IEEP pursuant to this
Agreement shall be hereinafter referred to and known as the "Community Partners Marketing
Program" or "MARKETING PROGRAM;"
WHElREAS, MARKETING PROGRAM is designed to emphasize the economic,
demographic and life-style facts and images of those certain geographic areas included within
the portions of San Bernardino and Riverside counties bounded by Los Angeles County on the
West, Orange and San Diego counties on the South, the Cities of Temecula, San Jacinto and
Banning on the East, and the San Bernardino Mountains on the North, together with the cities of
Claremont and Pomona (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Inland Empire") in order to:
(1) Increase information-nation available in the finance and real estate industries
about the Inland Empire economy;
(2) Increase the potential pool of employers interested in locating in the Inland
Empire.
WHElREAS, SPONSOR recognizes the benefits it may obtain through the
attraction of new business and investment to the Inland Empire;
WHElREAS, SPONSOR recognizes the need to promote the Inland Empire as a
positive business environment; and
WHElREAS, IEEP desires to provide, and SPONSOR desires to fund the
MARKETING PROGRAM in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement.
NOW 'fHElREFOlRE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, JEEP and SPONSOR agree as follows:
1
SECl'lON n
SElRvnCES 0][1 ][EEJJ>: TERM
1.1 Community Partners Marketing Program. During the term of this
Agreement, IEEP shall furnish all technical and professional services, including labor, material
facilities, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise, necessary to fully and adequately
perform the following services which shall constitute the Community Partners Marketing
Program (MARKETING PROGRAM):
A. MARKETING PROGRAM for Finance and Real Estate Industries
and Potential Emplovers. IEEP shall in good faith and based on its discretionary determination
that the following persons or entities exhibit some potential for conducting business in the Inland
Empire, use its best efforts to contact and provide information on the Inland Empire to: (1)
finance and real estate industry executives, (2) Southern California and other regional businesses,
and (3) executives of national and international corporations.
B. Trade Shows. IEEP shall attend trade shows, conventions and
other meetings directly related to the purposes of this Agreement. IEEP shall prepare, transport
and staff, as required, a trade show exhibit promoting the advantages of the Inland Empire to
select markets, companies and industries.
C. Other Terms. IEEP shall generally prepare, acquire and/or
disseminate information to promote the Inland Empire as a location for business and investment,
and shall carry out such other activities as may be reasonably necessary to achieve the purposes
of this Agreement. The frequency of materials provided and the specific individuals and entities
to be targeted by MARKETING PROGRAM pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to
IEEP's sole and absolute discretion. Except as set forth above, the IEEP's marketing efforts will
include display advertising materials in publications chosen at the discretion of the IEEP.
D. Schedule of Services. IEEP shall devote such time to the
performance of the services under this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for the
satisfactory and timely performance ofIEEP's obligations hereunder.
E. MARKETING PROGRAM Performance Measures. IEEP shall
monitor and report the results of MARKETING PROGRAM in accordance with the standards
set forth in Exhibit" A" (IEEP Marketing Plan) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
1.2 Term of Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall commence on the date first set forth hereinabove
and shall continue thereafter through and including June 30, 2001. From and after July 1, 2001,
this Agreement shall terminate and the parties hereto shall have no further debt or obligation
hereunder.
2
1.3 Representation. SPONSOR hereby grants to IEEP the right to provide
MARKETING PROGRAM on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. IEEP, from
time to time and pursuant to its sole and absolute discretion, may appoint and retain the services
of employees and independent contractors, all at IEEP's cost and expense with funds provided by
SPONSOR hereunder, to assist IEEP in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.
SECTION ][][
COMPENSATION
2.1 Pavments by Soonsor. IEEP shall receive compensation, for all services
rendered under this Agreement. The total compensation shall not exceed twelve thousand, seven
hundred and one dollar ($12,701.00) without written approval of SPONSOR's Representative
("Total Compensation").
2.2 Payment of Compensation. IEEP shall submit to SPONSOR an invoice
pursuant to this Agreement. SPONSOR shall within thirty (30) days of receiving such invoice
pay the Total Compensation indicated in Paragraph 2. I.
2.3 Additional Funding. SPONSOR agrees that the IEEP is authorized to seek
additional funding for MARKETING PROGRAM from other regional governmental bodies
including, but not limited to, the San Bernardino Association of Governments, the Western
Riverside Council of Governments, and the Inland Valley Development Agency.
SECTION ill
GENElRAlL CONmTIONS
3.1 Sponsor's Reoresentative. SPONSOR hereby designates James O'Grady,
Assistant City Manager or his designee as SPONSOR's Representative to IEEP. SPONSOR's
Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of SPONSOR for all purposes under this
Agreement and shall coordinate all phases of MARKETING PROGRAM on behalf of
SPONSOR, including, without limitation, the delivery of materials requested by the IEEP for
distribution to respondents in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. SPONSOR shall
work closely and cooperate fully with IEEP's Representative and any other agencies, which may
have jurisdiction over or an interest in MARKETING PROGRAM. SPONSOR's Representative
shall be available to IEEP's staff at all reasonable times. SPONSOR shall notify IEEP in writing
of any substitution in SPONSOR's Representative.
3.2 IEEP's Representative. IEEP's President/Chief Executive Officer, or his or
her designee, shall serve as IEEP's Representative and shall have the authority to act on behalf of
IEEP for all purposes under this Agreement.
3.3 Oversight. To facilitate reasonable oversight of MARKETING
PROGRAM by SPONSOR, IEEP agrees, during the term of this Agreement only, that
3
SPONSOR shall be eligible to have representatives selected by the IEEP Board of Directors for
membership on the IEEP Board of Directors. No less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the
seats on the IEEP Board of Directors shall be appointed from among the participating public
sector agencies. Any greater percentage shall be at the sole and absolute discretion of IEEP.
3.4 Independent Contractor. SPONSOR retains IEEP on an independent
contractor basis and IEEP is not an employee, agent or representative of SPONSOR. Any
personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of IEEP shall at all times be
under IEEP's exclusive direction and control. IEEP shall have the right to appoint or otherwise
designate suitable and desirable employees, agents, independent contractors and representatives
to perform services under this Agreement (uIEEP's Representatives"). IEEP's Representatives
shall be subordinate to IEEP and subject to each and all of the terms, provisions, and conditions
applying to IEEP hereunder. IEEP shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due IEEP
Representatives in their performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law.
IEEP shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting IEEP Representatives,
including, but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withho1dings, unemployment
insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. SPONSOR is interested only in the results
obtained by IEEP and MARKETING PROGRAM, and the IEEP shall have sole control of the
manner and means of performing its obligations under this Agreement. Except as expressly set
forth herein, SPONSOR shall not have the right to require IEEP to periodically report to
SPONSOR, conform to any fixed or minimum number of hours devoted to IEEP's obligations
hereunder, follow prescribed itineraries, keep records of business transacted, make adjustments,
bind SPONSOR, conform to particular policies of SPONSOR, or do anything else which would
jeopardize the relationship of independent contractor between SPONSOR and IEEP. SPONSOR
shall have no right or authority to commit IEEP in any matter, cause, or thing whatsoever,
without the prior written consent of IEEP either hereunder or otherwise, or to use IEEP's name in
any way not specifically authorized by this Agreement.
3.5 Termination. IEEP and SPONSOR shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement and suspend their performance hereunder upon the occurrence of any of the
following events:
A. Breach of Agreement. Breach or default by SPONSOR or IEEP of
any of the material terms, obligations, covenants, representations or warranties under this
Agreement which is not waived in writing by the non-defaulting party. In such case, however,
the non-defaulting party shall first notify the other of such alleged breach or default and provide
the other party with a period of thirty (30) days to cure the alleged breach or default. If the
breach or default is not capable of being cured within a thirty (30) day period, then the
defaulting party must commence a reasonable good faith effort to cure such breach or default
within the thirty (30) day period and shall thereafter diligently pursue such cure to completion.
B. Bankruptcy or Insolvency. IEEP or SPONSOR is declared
insolvent or bankrupt, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, has a receiver appointed
or any proceeding is demanded by, for or against IEEP or SPONSOR under any provision of the
federal Bankruptcy Act or any amendment thereof
4
3.6 Continuation of Services to other Particioating Agencies. In the event this
Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided in paragraph 3.5, IEEP may continue,
upon such terms and in such manner as it has or may determine appropriate, to provide services
similar to those provided to other Participating Agencies.
3.7 Indemnification. Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold the other
party, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any and all liability
from loss, damage, or injury to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any marmer
arising out of or incident to its negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct arising out of or in
connection with its performance of this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of
attorneys' fees. Further, each party shall defend at its own expense, including attorneys' fees,
the other party, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in any legal action based upon such
negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct.
3.8 Notices and Requests. Any notice, demand, or request required or
permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly
delivered and effective on the third business day after having been deposited in the United States
mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, and addressed to the addressee as set forth below.
If delivered by facsimile machine to such addressee, such notice shall be deemed to have been
duly delivered and effective on the date transmitted. If delivered via overnight courier to such
addressee, such notice shall be deemed to have been duly delivered and effective on the next
business day. Any party may change its address for purposes of this Agreement by written
notice given in accordance herewith.
][ElElP: INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP
301 East Vanderbilt Way, Ste. 100
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Attention: Teri Ooms
Phone: 909-890-1090
Fax: 909-890-1088
SlPONSOR: CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
Temecu1a, CA 92589
Attention: Jim O'Grady
Phone: 909-694-6444
Fax: 909-693-3903
3.9 Assignment Without Consent Prohibited. The rights or obligations of any
of the parties hereto may not be assigned or delegated, respectively, without the prior written
consent of the other party hereunder, which consent may be withheld in such party's sole and
absolute discretion. Any assignment by either party hereunder shall not release such party from
any of its obligations hereunder. Except as specifically provided above, neither party to this
Agreement may, voluntarily or by operation of law, assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights
or obligations under this Agreement.
5
3.10 Exhibit. Exhibit "A" attached hereto is hereby incorporated by reference
in this Agreement. Nothing contained in any such exhibit shall supersede or annul the terms and
provisions of this Agreement, unless the matter set forth in the exhibit shall explicitly so provide
to the contrary. In the event of any ambiguity in meaning or understanding between the
provisions of this Agreement and the appended exhibit, the provisions of this Agreement shall
control.
3.11 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the exhibit attached hereto,
shall constitute the entire Agreement between SPONSOR and IEEP concerning the subject
matter hereof and shall supersede all prior and contemporaneous Agreements between the
parties.
3.12 No Joint Venture or Partnership. SPONSOR and IEEP shall not, by virtue
of this Agreement, in any way or for any reason, be deemed to be or have become a partner of
the other in the conduct of its business or otherwise, or a joint venture.
3.13 Gender and Number. The use herein ofthe neutered -gender includes the
masculine and the feminine and the singular number includes the plural, whenever the context so
requires.
3.14 Captions. The captions and headings provided in this Agreement are
inserted for convenience of reference only and do not define, describe or limit the scope or the
intent of this Agreement or any of the terms hereof
3.15 CountelJlarts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed a fully executed original.
3.16 Attorneys' Fees. In the event either party commences litigation for the
judicial interpretation, enforcement, termination, cancellation or recision hereof, or for damages
for the breach hereof, then, in addition to any and all other relief awarded in such litigation, the
prevailing party therein shall be entitled to a judgment against the other for an amount equal to
reasonable attorneys' fees and court and other costs incurred.
3.17 Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
3.18 Modification and Waiver. No modification, waiver, amendment,
discharge or change ofthis Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by
the party against which the enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment, discharge or
change is or may be sought.
3.19 Severability. In the event any term, covenant, condition, provision or
agreement herein contained is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable by any court of
competent jurisdiction, the fact that such term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement is
invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, shall in no way effect the validity or enforceability of
any other term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement herein contained.
6
3.20 Binding Agreement. Subject to any limitation on assignment elsewhere
set forth herein, all terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon, ensure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and
assigns.
3.21 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of
this Agreement.
3.22 Prohibited Interests.
A. Solicitation. IEEP maintains and warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for IEEP,
to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, IEEP warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed
to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for IEEP, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or
resulting from the award or making of this Agreement For breach or violation of this warranty,
SPONSOR shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.
B. Conflict ofInterest. For the term of this Agreement, no member,
officer or employee of SPONSOR, during the term of his or her service with SPONSOR, shall
have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit
arising therefrom.
3.23 Equal Opportunity Emplovment. IEEP represents that it is an equal
opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-
discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment,
upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.
7
JIN WlI1'NJESS WlEIElREOlF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first above written.
INLAND EMPIRE
ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone
Mayor
Teri Ooms
President & CEO
ATTEST:
Susan Jones, CMS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
Agency Attorney
8
rrEM 1 B
-
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN E
CITY MANAGER L)tJ
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: James O'Grady, Assistant City Manage
DATE: July 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Consideration of Economic Development Sponsorship Requests
Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:
funding for the following events:
1)
That the City Council review and approve
a) Funding for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival in the amount of
$35,000.
b) Funding for the Rod Run for actual city-support costs in the amount up to
$30,000.
c) Funding for the Frontier Days Rodeo for actual city-support costs in the
amount up to $7,000.
d) Funding for the Great Temecula Tractor Race for actual city-support costs
in the amount up to $14,000.
2) That the City Council approve the event sponsorship agreement with the
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Association and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement.
3) That the City Council approve the event sponsorship agreements with the
Temecula Town Association and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements.
DISCUSSION: Staff has received the annual sponsorship requests for the
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival, Temecula Rod Run, Frontier Days Rodeo,
and The Great Temecula Tractor Race.
On Tuesday, June 27, 2000, the City Council approved funding for these events as part
of the City's FY 2000-01 Operating Budget. The Economic Development Sub-committee,
Mayor Pro Tem Jeff Comerchero and Councilmember Ron Roberts, and Staff met with
representatives from the the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Association
(TVBWFA) and the Temecula Town Association (TTA) to discuss their funding on
Monday, April 24th, and Tuesday, April 25th. At that time each of the organizations made
presentations and provided additional information to the Sub-committee members. The
Sub-committee funding recommendations for both organizations contained different
levels as last years due to the TVBWFA and TTA funding requests.
F:\DeplslCITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareportsl2OO().()l sponsorships.doc
1
The City of Temecula hosts a wide array of special events year-round all adding to its
rich quality of life. Residents and visitors look forward to attending these popular events
each year and the events help make Temecula the unique community that it is.
The events have proven to be very effective in getting exposure for Temecula both on a
local and national level. The events increase tourism revenue for the City's restaurants,
hotels, shopping centers and wineries.
Due to the fact that the events promote tourism in Temecula, funding would come from
the General Fund's budget. There will be no commissions paid to any party for the City
of Temecula's sponsorships.
Temecula Vallev Balloon IL Wine Festival Association
Since 1983, the Balloon & Wine Festival has been a community tradition in the
Temecula Valley region. This family event has proven to be very effective in getting
exposure both on a local and national level. The 2001 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine
Festival will be celebrating its 18-year anniversary at Lake Skinner. The Festival will be
held in Mayor June 2001 (actual dates to be determined).
The 2000 Festival drew an estimated attendance of 38,000 spectators over the
weekend.
The 2000 media outreach included print, radio, television, and cable. In addition, the
Festival website provided comprehensive information and was linked to Festival
sponsors. A promotional partnership was arranged with Vons stores throughout
Southern California. Other promotional partnerships included Longs Drug Stores and
Ticketmaster.
A sampling of out-of-area print advertising consisted of the Los Angeles Times, Orange
County Register, San Bernardino Sun, San Diego Reader and Los Angeles Weekly.
Local advertising included The Press-Enterprise and The Californian, resulting in
$17,000 of sponsored advertising space plus special editorial sections promoting the
Festival.
Media buys and promotions were arranged with radio stations including: Arrow 93, K-
EARTH, KATY, KFRG, and KIFM.
Clippings continue to be compiled, but print publicity coverage was strong. Television
coverage included several segments on KABC as well as mentions on KTTV and KCOP.
Printed materials produced by the Festival included bill stuffers, flyers and posters. Two
Festival newsletters were produced and were distributed to members/businesses of the
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. The Festival was featured in the April issue of
Temecula Today, the newsletter for the Chamber of Commerce.
A draft of the 2001 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival marketing/advertising
campaign can be reviewed in Attachment I-B.
F:\DeptslCITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareportsl200Q.{)1 sponsorships.doc
2
FundinQ Request
Staff has received the sponsorship request in the amount of $35,000 for Premier
Sponsor of the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival, which is attached for your
review (Attachment I - A). The City Council approved $30,000 for the 2000 Festival.
The City sponsorship for the 1999 Festival was $35,000.
Economic Development Sub-committee FundinQ Recommendation
Staff budgeted $35,000 for this event in the City's FY 2000-01 Operating Budget. The
Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is for $35,000. This
will provide funding for the advertising and public safety of the event. Public safety
provided by the County of Riverside has increased and the additional funding will help
offset this expense.
Temecula Town Association
The Temecula Town Association is modifying its funding request for the new fiscal year.
In the past, the TTA has asked the City of Temecula for $15,000 per event in addition to
funding all City support costs. The TT A feels that their three major fund raising events
are adequately controlled and they no longer require direct financial help from the City.
For the coming year the TTA is asking for the City to provide funding for all city-support
costs and no direct funding.
Temecula Rod Run
The Temecula Town Association will produce the Rod Run event for the fourth year.
The Temecula Rod Run 2001 will be held in Old Town Temecula on February 16th -
18th. The event will include invitations to celebrity car buffs, special events and activities
spread throughout the City of Temecula, and additional publicity events.
The estimated attendance at the 2000 Rod Run was 36,000 for the two days. The TTA
staged several activities to enhance the event. On Friday, there was an autograph
signing with Jan & Dean and a beach-themed concert at Pechanga. The "Woodie" event
and Sock Hop was held on Saturday at the Temecula Town Center.
The 2000 marketing program included publicity consisting of television, newspaper,
radio, website, flyers, posters and programs. Additional advertising included billboard
and in-store displays at Albertson's Grocery stores in the Riverside area. A Rod Run
Preview Media Day was held at the Temecula Town Center.
Publicity, press releases and feature articles appeared in local and regional publications
totaling over 2.8 million impressions. Event articles appeared in major newspapers as
the Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union Tribune, Press-Enterprise, North County
Times and local papers. Magazine coverage included such key publications as
Westways, Inland Empire Magazine, and San Diego Magazine.
Radio coverage reached a cumulative listening audience of nearly 3/4 million. Major
stations promoting the event included: KWRP, KOLA/KCAL, KATY, KFROG, KDES and
KFWB.
Television coverage included six major Los Angeles and San Diego network stations
announcing the event including ABC, NBC, KCOP and KCAL. Cable coverage included
F:\DeptslCITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareports\2OOlHl1 sponsorships.doc
3
the Sarah Coleman Show, Orange County Cable News and community announcements
on TCI and Media One.
Marketing and publicity for the 2001 Rod Run will include the website, flyers/posters,
table tents, bottle neck riders, in-store displays, radio, print and television. The Rod Run
Preview event will be held on September 9, 2000, at the Temecula Town Center.
FundinQ Reauest
Staff has received the sponsorship request to fund all city-support service costs
including police, fire and public works for the Rod Run. Based upon this request, the
estimated costs of support services requested by the Temecula Town Association (TTA)
for the sponsorship of the Rod Run would be approximately $30,000.
Last year the City paid for all actual city-support service costs including police, fire and
publiC works. The actual city-support service costs for the 2000 Rod Run totaled
approximately $21,000. The weather contributed to the lowering of the costs incurred by
the Police Department, due to the reduction of manpower. Police Department billing for
this event was projected at $18,000.
Future police costs projected for the 2001 Rod Run will be in excess of $20,000 plus
public works, fire and additional departmental costs with total costs estimated at
$30,000. The FY 2000-01 budget provides for funding up to $30,000 for actual city-
support service costs.
Economic Development Sub-committee Fundino Recommendation
The Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is to provide
funding for actual city-support service costs up to $30,000. If the Rod Run requires any
significant and unanticipated city-support expenses including police, fire and/or public
works above the budgeted amount, further billing of the TTA would be required. The
Rod Run event must be held within the City of Temecula limits. The TTA will need to
adhere to the Rod Run Model Conditions of Approval which are included as an
attachment to the Contract Agreement.
Frontier Davs Rodeo
The Frontier Days Rodeo, a PRCA-Sanctioned Rodeo, is produced by the Temecula
Town Association. The rodeo will be held on Memorial Day weekend, May 25 - 27,
2001. Over the past few years the event was held at the Northwest Sports Complex at
Diaz and Winchester Roads. Due to the planned development of the proposed
Northwest Sports Park at this site, the TTA will need to select an alternate site to be
located within the City of T emecula limits.
The Rodeo will include the free Lil' Cowpokes Rodeo which will be held on Friday, May
25th. This continues to be a popular event for Temecula elementary school students.
The 2000 rodeo drew an attendance of approximately 6,000 for the three performances,
over 100 cowboys from the Western United States, and 680 Temecula school-aged
children for the free Friday performance.
This event gains national exposure through the Pro-Rodeo news, PRCA website, and
PRCA sponsors including Wrangler Jeans, Dodge Truck and Coca-Cola.
F:\DeptslCITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareports\2CJOO<l1 sponsorships.doc
4
Media coverage for the 2000 event consisted of radio, print, cable television and website
coverage. Radio coverage included major stations such as KXFG/KFROG, KWRP,
KOLA/KCAL and KA TY FM. Key national publications included Pro Rodeo News, and
the San Bernardino Sun.
Newspaper/magazine advertising included The Horse Trader, the Scout, the Californian
& the Bargain Bulletin.
Final marketing plans and data will be provided to the City as the event nears.
FundinQ ReQuest
Staff has received the sponsorship request to fund all actual city-support service costs
including police, fire and public works for the Frontier Days Rodeo. Based upon this
request, the estimated costs of support services requested by the Temecula Town
Association (TTA) for the sponsorship of the Rodeo would be approximately $7,000.
Last year the TTA was awarded $10,000 cash, plus the City paid for all actual city-
support service costs including police, fire and public works. The city-support service
costs for the 2000 Rodeo were estimated at $6,500. The City's FY 2000-01 Operating
Budget provides for funding for actual city-support costs in the amount up to $7,000.
The Economic Development Sub-committee FundinQ Recommendation
The Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is to provide for
the payment of all actual city-support services in the amount up to $7,000. If the Frontier
Days Rodeo requires any significant and unanticipated city-support expenses of police,
fire and/or public works above the budgeted amount, further billing of the TTA would be
required.
The Great Temecula Tractor Race
The 24'" Great Temecula Tractor Race, sponsored by the Temecula Town Association,
will be held at the Northwest Sports Complex at Diaz and Winchester Roads on October
6 - 8, 2000.
Over 100 tractors ranging from garden lawnmowers to large farm diesel tractors race
over an oval dirt track. Other activities include: Friday Casino Night, Kids Country with
music workshops by the Musicians Workshop and Bluegrass bands, a kid's circus, kids
tractor painting, mud volleyball and muddy tug of wars. Saturday's concert features top
blues performers and bluegrass bands.
Promoted through newspapers, radio, cable television and local direct mail shoppers,
the event draws 20,000 spectators. Television stations over the years have found this
event great for footage, with special features airing on FOX, KTLA, KCAL, and KABC
and NBC sports broadcasts.
Newspaper/magazine impressions exceeded 2.2 million circulation in press releases
appearing in major publications including The Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union
Tribune, San Bernardino Sun, Press-Enterprise, Californian, San Diego Magazine and
San Diego Home and Garden.
F:\DeptslC ITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareports\2000-01 sponsorships.doc
5
The 1999 mud volleyball event offered a $1000 purse and had a field of over 30 teams.
Clubs, restaurants, radio stations and individual spectators in teams of four and six
competed for two full days.
Marketing for the 2000 event has already begun with a media day scheduled for August
26, 2000. The marketing and promotions time line and promotional events are found in
attachment IV - B.
FundinQ Reauest
Staff has received the sponsorship request to fund all actual city-support service costs
including police, fire and public works for the Great Temecula Tractor Race. Based upon
this request, the estimated costs of support services requested by the Temecula Town
Association (TT A) for the sponsorship of the Tractor Race would be approximately
$14,000.
Last year the TTA was awarded $10,000 cash, plus the City paid for all actual city-
support service costs including police, fire and public works. The FY 2000-01 budget
provides for up to $14,000 for actual city-support service costs.
The Economic Development Sub-committee Fundina Recommendation
The Economic Development Sub-committee funding recommendation is to provide for
funding of all actual city-support services in the amount up to $14,000. If the Tractor
Race requires any significant and unanticipated city-support expenses of police, fire
and/or public works above the budgeted amount, further billing of the TTA would be
required.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been included in the FY 2000-01
Operating Budget (Economic Development line item, account #001-111-999-5266) for
the recommended sponsorship amounts. The city-support costs have also been
included in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget of the various support departments.
Once the event agreement has been executed in final form, the Balloon & Wine Festival
Association will receive sponsorship payment.
Once the event agreements have been executed in final form, the TTA will be able to
receive city-support services at the time of each event.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival
Attachment A - Sponsorship Package
Attachment B - 2001 Festival Marketing/Advertising Campaign
Attachment C - 2001 Budget
Attachment D - 2000 Festival MedialPromotions Recap
Attachment E - Sponsorship Agreement
II. Temecula Rod Run
Attachment A - Sponsorship Package
Attachment B - City Support Services and Costs
Attachment C - 2001 Rod Run Media/Promotions Campaign
Attachment D - 2000 Rod Run Media/Promotions Recap
Attachment E - Sponsorship AgreementIModel Conditions of
Approval
IITEMEC _FS 101 \VOL 1 IDeptslCITYMGRIWolnickglAgendareports\2000-01 sponsorships.doc
6
III. Frontier Davs Rodeo
Attachment A - Sponsorship Package
Attachment B - City Support Services and Costs
Attachment C- 2000 Frontier Days Rodeo Media/Promotions
Recap
Attachment D - Sponsorship Agreement
IV. The Great Temecula Tractor Race
Attachment A - Sponsorship Package
Attachment B - City Support Services and Costs
Attachment C - 2000 Marketing/Advertising Campaign
Attachment D - 2000 Budget
Attachment E - 1999 Great Temecula Tractor Race Medial
Promotions Recap
Attachment F - Sponsorship Agreement
IITEMEC JS 1 01 \VOL 1 IDepts\CITYMGR\WolnickglAgendareports\2OQ().Ql sponsorships. doc
7
I. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON I!. WINE FESTIVAL
ATTACHMENT A- SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
APR-17-BB MON 12:43 83632852 ajn 263 91d
909 6765921
Pa01
_r~~_
~~-~~
fPrrrFJmU@[f ~[p)<<JJffi}~~i $3J&Jjy@@@
(On/y one Premier Sponsorship avai/able)
1. Identification as Premier Sponsor in all Festival materials
2. Exclusivity in Premier Sponsor's field
3. Inclusion 01 logo in all Festival print advertising
4. Mention in all festival paid radio and newspaper advertising
5. Sponsor representative interviewed on projected radio remote
broadcast
6. Right to use Festival logo on Premier Sponsor's materials
(with Festival advance approval)
7. Full page, color ad in Festival program
8. Representative introduced from stage and invited to speak
several times during Festival
9. Four signs or bannerS on-site at event (Sponsor to provide)
10. Separate display tent in high-traffic area
11. Access to VIP Hospitality Tent for twenty guests
12. Linking of Premier sponsor's web site to Festival site
13. Mention in Festival newsletter
14. Mention in at least ten Festival news releases to general media
15. Sponsor's logo on table tents displayed in participating area
restaurants and other retail establishments
16. Sponsor's name in Festival brochure
17. Forty adult Festival tickets
18. Twenty parking passes
19. Invitation to Sponsor Appreciation Dinner 10r twelve people
20. Thirty sets of Official Festival souvenir merchandise
I. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON IL WINE FESTIVAL
ATTACHMENT B - 2001 FESTIVAL MARKETING/ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN
l'lEMIlECll.JlI..A V A1LJLJE1{ lBAlLJLOON AND WTINlE lFlE51'W AIL
~l'][NG JPllI..AN 2001
The Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, (herein after referred to as
"Festival") is orchestrating a comprehensive marketing, promotional and
publicity campaign designed to attract visitors to the 2001 event at beautiful
Lake Skinner Recreation Area
Because the name ''Temecula'' is an integral part of the event title, all marketing
of this regional entertainment event naturally promotes the city as well. The
event campaign also puts both in the spotlight, highlighting Temecula's
location, history and amenities along with event-specific information.
Elements in the campaign include, but are not limited to:
More than 150 local, regional and national corporations and businesses, will
receive information packages inviting sponsorship of the 2001 event, with
personal follow up calls made to each and meetings being held on an ongoing
basis.
Companies who we worked with in the past for promotional marketing tie-ins
will be approached again. They include Vons, Longs Drug Stores, AT&T,
Budweiser Ticketmaster and others. These affiliations will promote the
Temecula name through in-store displays, advertising and other methods of
promotion.
Shopping centers such as The Promenade, Prime Outlet Center, Ontario Mills,
North County Fair, Horton Plaza and other high-traffic centers will be
approached to assist in promotions, including displays of posters, flyer
distribution, and ticket outlets.
Local business such as the former Rancho Steak House site, Rancho Ford
Lincoln Mercury, and others will be contacted to sponsor and display cold air
balloons promoting the Festival.
An estimated 20,000 plus billing stuffers will be offered to local business
through the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce mailing list.
Edwards Theatres will be approached again to promote the Festival with an
on-screen slide on all screens starting two weeks before the event
A potential promotional partnership with Vons will again be developed. This
promotion will include in store banners, signs and aisle displays in 240 stores in
Southern California, from Santa Barbara to the Mexican border.
A media distribution list of more than 350 print and broadcast representatives
will be receiving a continuing flow of press materials and personal follow-up
between now and the Festival date. All media outlets will be provided with
stories, photographs, interview opportunities and information that will result in
maximum news coverage of the event The media list includes a broad
spectrum of entertainment editors, travel publications and editors, food and
wine publications and editors, ballooning publications and more.
Selected media representatives will be invited to Temecula on an individual
basis for media preview days ofTemecula.
Media and marketing materials distributed throughout Southern California will
encourage visits to the Festival website, which links to the City of Temecula's
site. Information about the event is being placed on an extensive list of other
internet sites, including festival and event calendars, travel sites, wine and
ballooning sites, and music and entertainment sites.
Riverside, San Diego and Los Angeles moming television shows and interview
programs are being contacted about scheduling on-site programs and event
news coverage. Radio stations throughout Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and
San Diego counties will be contacted for interview and promotional
opportunities.
Media outlets will be contacted including Riverside Press-Enterprise, San Diego
Union Tribune, The Californian and North County Times, Inland
Entertainment Round-Up, The Entertainer, Adelphia Cable, television stations
and radio stations KFRG/KXFG, KATY, KWRP, KGGI, KABC, KFI and
KIFM. Media such as the Los Angeles Times, and Orange County Register will
be contacted for sponsorship participation and/or discounted non-profit ad
rates.
On behalf of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival negotiations with
all media to maximize the impact of the Festival's advertising budget, now
valued at, approximately $114,000.00. Media promotions as described can more
than quadruple the value of this budget In addition, co-op advertising
programs with radio stations have the potential to bring significant advertising
benefits to the Festival and the City.
A public service campaign to promote the Festival and Temecula, is planned to
utilize the free air time made available on broadcast stations to non-profit
organizations and events. Radio and television public service spots will be
produced and distributed throughout Southern California.
I. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON lL WINE FESTIVAL
ATTACHMENT C - 2001 FESTIVAL BUDGET
ZilDilD IlIBS1UID><G lET
For your information we have included a copy of the 2000 budget.
The 2001 budget will be comparable to the 2000 budget, with
minor adjustments. The 2001 Board of Directors will be seated in
July 2000. The new board's priority will be establishing the 2001
budget and the date of the Festival.
,
,
Temecula Valley Balloon l1, Wine Festival
l8uJlldlgs~ OVSIi1fOSW
July 1999 through June 2000
Jul '99 - Jun '00
Ordinary IncomelExpense
Income
4100. Sponsor Income
4200 . Admissions Income
4220 . Outside tlc~et sales
4230 ' RV tlc~et sales
4235 . Friday admissions
4240 . Saturday IIc~et sales
4250 . Sunday IIc~et sales
Tola14200 . Admissions Income
4300 . Balloon Income
4320 ' Corporate balloons
ToIal4300 ' Balloon Income
4400 ' Beverage Income
4415 . BeerlWlne
4430 ' Ice
Tolal4400 ' Beverage Income
4600 . C0mm2rclal court Income
4610 . Entry fees
Tolal4500 ' COI1l11Il!rclal courllncome
4600 . Food courllncome
4610 . Entry fees
Total 4500 ' Food COUrllncome
4650 . Parltlng Income
4655 ' Kids Fare
4667 ' Undl!lWrltlng
4668 ' %
ToIal4665 ' KIds Fare
4700 . Souvenir Income
4900 . Arts and crafts Income
4910 ' Entry fees
Tolill4900 . Arts and cralls Income
136,000.00
27.000.00
19,000.00
10,000.00
117,000.00
76,000.00
249,000.00
3,750.00
3,750.00
132,000.00
1,000.00
133,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
ToIallncome
Expense
6000 . Operating expense
6010 . Ban~ charges and fees
6015 ' Copy I1lllchlne
6025 ' Dues
6030 ' Equlpml!nt repairs
6035 . Insurance~lablllty
5045 ' Lease / rent
6060 . Ucenses 8. pennlts
6055 . Mileage
6060 . Postage
6065 . Prinllng
5070 . Seminars 8. travel
6075 ' Subscriptions 8. publications
6080 ' Supplies
6085. Telephone I office expense
Tolill6000 ' Operating expense
5100 ' Payroll expense
6110. Wages
5120 ' Payrollt"" expense
5125 . Employee beneftl
5130 . Worlunan's compensation
Total 5100 ' Payroll expense
5200 ' Board expense
31,000.00
31 ,000.00
24,000.00
8,000.00
2,500.00
10,500.00
36,000.00
12,200.00
12,200.00
669,450.00
:nJ.00
2,500.00
1,:nJ.OO
500.00
9,500.00
5,000.00
1,400.00
350.00
2,400.00
1,500.00
3,000.00
100.00
3,000.00
4,:nJ.00
35,ISO.00
44,000.00
3,700.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
SO, 1 00.00
Page 1
TemeCLDla V2IlIey B2IlIoon lb Wine Festival
I8lU1id1$1Je~ Oveli"Voew
July 1999 through June 2000
5220 . Meetings
5230 . Shirts
Total 5200 . Board expense
5300 . Donation expense
5310. M.H.S. Baseball Program
5320 . Temecula Volunteer Fire DepL
Total 5300 . Donation expense
5400 . Command exp.mse
5410. Food a. beverages
5440 . Supplies
5450 . Telephone
Total 5400 . Command expense
5500 . Facllllles
5515 . Fencing
5520 . Fuel
5525 . Electrical
5530. Golf carts
5535 . Ughltowers
5550 . RV's a. modulars
5555 . Slgnage
5560 . Equlpnmll rental
5565 . Storage bins
5570 . Supplies
5572 . Tables and Chairs
5575. Tents
5580 . Toilets
5585 . Trash1Clean-Up
Total 5500 . Facllllles
5700 . Marltetlng expense
6710 . Cold air balloon
6715 . Flyers
6732 . Postage
6735 . Print marltetlng
6740 . Program
6745 . Radio
6750 . Marltetlng Finn
6755 . Brochure
6767 . Telephone and fax
6765 . Assorted Services
Total 5700 . Marltetlng expense
5800 . Professional fees
5810 . Accounting
5820 . Auditing
5830 . Consulllng
Total 5800 . Professional fees
5900 . Public safety
5910. Highway patrol
5920 . Security
5940 . Shertffs
5950 . Supplies
5960 . -Rildlos
Total 5900 . Public safety
6ODO . Sponsor expense
6020 . Souvenirs
6040 . Sponsor Awards
Total 6000 . Sponsor expense
6100 . Volunteer
6110 . Food
6120 . T-shirts
Jul '119 - Jun '00
250.00
250.00
500.00
7,CXXJ.00
1,700.00
8,700.00
3,500.00
I,CXXJ.oo
1,500.00
6,CXXJ.00
10,CXXJ.00
2,CXXJ.00
30,400.00
8,CXXJ.00
3,CXXJ.00
5,CXXJ.00
5,CXXJ.00
1,500.00
900.00
500.00
5,CXXJ.00
34,CXXJ.oo
II,CXXJ.oo
6,600.00
lZ3,loo.oo'
2.500.00
2.CXXJ.00
250.00
22.500.00
17,CXXJ.00
22.500.00
25,CXXJ.oo
1,200.00
1,200.00
10,CXXJ.00
104,150.00
2,500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
5,500.00
2,600.00
17,400.00
18.CXXJ.00
I,CXXJ.oo
1.700.00
40,700.00
2,CXXJ.00
4,CXXJ.00
6,CXXJ.00
2,CXXJ.00
1,500.00
Page 2
,
Temecula Valley Balloon If, Wine Festival
ISlUIo1g)s~ Ovsrousw
July 1999 through June 2000
6130 . Printing
Total 6100 . Volunteer
6200 . Admissions expense
6210 . County fee - parldng
6215 . County fees -lIckets
6220 . Entry refund
6270 . Ticket printing
Total 6200 . Admissions expense
6300 . Balloon expense
6310'Acconoodallons
6320 . Show~p incentives
6340 . Fuel
Total 6300 . Balloon expense
6400 . Bevenlge expense
6410. ABC license
6415. Be<!r
6420 . Bevenlge supplies
6435 . Ice
6440 . Micro beer-tasllng
Total 6400 . Beverage expense
6500 . Commercial court expense
6520 . Insurance
Total 6500 . COl11lm!rclal court expense
6600 . Entertainment expense
6620 . Producer/Boo~lng Agent
6700 . Main bacllstage supplies
6710'Acconunodallons
6730 . Food
6770 . Sound a. Ughts
6780 . Slllges
Total 6700 . Main backstage supplies
6900 . Entertainer acts
6910 . Kids Falre
6920 . Main stage
6930 . Wine stage
Total 6900 . Entertainer acts
Jul '99 - Jun '00
300.00
3,600.00
7,000.00
10,000.00
500.00
2,000.00
19,500.00
9,000.00
3,000.00
1,200.00
13,200.00
33:>.00
9,000.00
1,200.00
2,000.00
2,700.00
15,23:>.00
2,600.00
2,600.00
7,500.00
6,000.00
3,000.00
15,000.00
12,000.00
36,000.00
6,500.00
79,500.00
10,000.00
95,000.00
1 :l9,500.oo
Total 6600 . Entertainment expense
7300 . Food court expense
7320 . Insurance
7340 . Health Pennlt
Total 7300 . Food court expense
7500 . Pamlng
7510 . Supplies
7520 . Cones
Total 7500 . Pamlng
7600 . Souvenir expense
7620 . Inventory purchases
7640 . Supplies
7670 . &lIes Tax
Total 7600 . Souvenir expense
7700 . VIP expense
7710 . Water
7720 . Food
774l1'Supplles
mo . Wine
875.00
560.00
1,425.00
SlO.oo
300.00
830.00
3:>,000.00
250.00
3,000.00
33,250.00
50.00
2.000.00
500.00
1,200.00
Page 3
TemecQJI!al Val~!ey l3al~loOD1lll, Wine Fes~i"all
181UJ0I@J1S~ OVISIi"\fDISW
July '1999 through June 2000
Jul '99 - Jun '00
Total noo . VIP expense
7800 . Wine tasting venue expense
7810 . Glasses - plastic
7815 . Glasses - tasting
7860 . Tlc~ets
7870 . Wine
Total 7800 . Wine tasting venue expense
7900 . Arts and crafts expense
7910 . Insurance
Total 7900 . Arts and crafts expense
Total Expense
3,750.00
2,500.00
6,500.00
200.00
35,000.00
44,200.00
2,llS6.oo
2,llS6.oo
9,450.00
Net Ordinary Income
0.00
Net Inc"",,,
0.00
Page 4
I. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON 8. WINE FESTIVAL
ATTACHMENT D - 2000 FESTIVAL MEDIA/PROMOTIONS RECAP
2ijij~ ,],IEMIIE<C1UJLA V AJLJLIEV JffiAJLJL~~N & WITNIE IFIE~1l1IV AJL
MIA.m(]E,],ITNG ~1UMIMlA.JRV
An outstanding festival attendance of 38,000 can be attributed in part to a
comprehensive marketing campaign, which included the following
elements:
ProN']' A..II))"VlElR1l1I~ITNG
Sponsorship agreements were reached with both the Press-Enterprise
and The Californian, resulting in $17,000 of sponsored advertising space
plus special editorial sections promoting the festival. Other promotional
relationships with The Recycler and Orange County Weekly resulted in
sponsored or discounted ad space valued at an additional $1,900.
Advertising was also placed in Los Angeles Weekly, San Bernardino Sun,
San Diego Reader, Los Angeles Times and the Orange County Register.
JffilR~A..]lJJ<CA..~,], AJ[J)VJElR1l1I~IING & PlR~MI~']'mN~
A promotional relationship was established with Adelphia Cable,
involving a media buy and promotion that resulted in more than 450
commercials and 280 promotional spots, distribution of 800 tickets to new
Adelphia subscribers, production of promo spots, and Festival mentions in
various Adelphia marketing materials.
Media buys and promotions were arranged with the following radio
stations: Arrow 93, K-EARTH, Mega 100, KIEV, KSYR, KFRG, KATY,
Lite 92.7, KVCR, KIFM, Oldies 94.9, and the Desert Radio Group. In
addition to paid commercial time, several stations were Festival and stage
sponsors, promoting ticket give-aways, contests and on-site broadcasts, with
some promotions starting a month prior to the event.
Utilizing the Southern California Broadcasters Association's
recognition of the Festival as a non-profit organization by issuing it an
SCBA #, 15 and 30 second radio public service spots were written and
distributed to Southern California radio stations.
IP1lJlffilLlIClI1!1{
An extensive outreach to print and broadcast media outlets was begun
six months before the Festival and continued up to the Festival weekend.
Local, regional and national media lists were updated from the previous
year, and personal contact was made with all key entertainment and calendar
editors.
A flow of news releases and information to key outlets began in
December, 1999. From then until the festival weekend, approximately 18
separate releases and related documents were created about various aspects
of the event. These were disseminated to media singly or in press packets,
augmented by collateral materials as appropriate, including talent
photographs and a photo of the souvenir poster.
Specialized distributions of posters, press materials, ticket vouchers,
or other enclosures, were sent to editors of travel sections at California
newspapers and television shows and news departments throughout
Southern California.
The public relations firm worked one-on-one with a wide variety of
media, to answer questions and provide information and materials to meet
their needs and deadlines, and to e-mail materials where requested.
Clippings continue to be compiled, but print publicity coverage was
deemed excellent. Television coverage included several segments on KABC
as well as mentions on KTTV and KCOP.
IPlROMlO1I'lIONAlL MIA 1I'Th:mAlLS
Fliers/Posters
50,000 Fliers (8 'h x 11) and 1000 Event Posters (18 x 24) were
produced and distributed to promote the event.
One component of the distribution was a mailing to the members of
the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, offering them materials to
promote the Festival to their own customers. In response to this mailing,
requests were received for 21,778 Fliers, and 164 Posters.
Sponsors of the Festival along with members of the Temecula Rotary
displayed fliers and posters in their businesses.
Newsletters
Two Festival newsletters were produced: 1,350 March Newsletters
(4 pages) and 1,350 May Newsletters (6 pages), were distributed to
members/business of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce.
PrOgramS
15,000 Programs were distributed to Festival guests.
VONS S'JI'OlRJES
A promotional partnership was arranged with V ons stores throughout
Southern California. This promotion included banners, signs and aisle
displays in Vons 240 stores from Santa Barbara to the Mexican border.
Banners were up in the month of May and first part of June. Festival
promotion was included in Vons in-store guide the week of June 7, 2000.
The promotion also included offering a $2.00 ticket discount with a Vons
Club card selected Riverside County stores also sold tickets. The Festival
was promoted in the V ons circular distributed to households throughout
Southern California the week of May 31, 2000.
LONGS ]]}]lUJG S'JI'OlRES
The Festival was promoted in the Longs Drug Store circular
distributed to households throughout Southern California the week of May
22,2000.
1rJl ClKJE'JI'MAS'JI'ElR
A promotional partnership was arranged with Ticketmaster, including
the following elements:
Inclusion in Hot Sheet
Inclusion in Entertainment Weekly Magazine
Inclusion in Ticketmasters website - direct link to Festival site
Deal of the Week for San Diego for May 30 - June 5, 2000:
Ticke1master SignOnSanDiego and KyXy provided:
Marketing and promotion of the program
Prominent exposure on SignOnSanDiego homepage
Prominent exposure on the Ticketmaster.com homepage
Exposure on Ticke1master.com Giveaways Page
']['lEMlEC1Ull...A ']['<[))]]}AY
The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival was featured in the
April issue of Temecula Today; the newsletter for the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce.
lFlES']['][V All... WlElffiSnlE
The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival website provided
comprehensive information and was regularly updated and will continue to
be updated. The website included general information, entertainment line-
up, listing of board members, directions, links to sponsors as well as the 17
year history of the Festival.
###
I. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON t!. WINE FESTIVAL
ATTACHMENT E - SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
ADVERTISING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA AND
TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON I!. WINE ASSOCIATION
This Agreement, made this 11th day of Julv. 2000, by and between the CITY OF
TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON I!.
WINE ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as
("TVBWA").
A. TVBWA will operate the "Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival" in
Mayor June 2001 (actual dates to be determined). The Temecula Valley Balloon &
Wine Festival is a special event located at Lake Skinner featuring approximately 50 hot
air balloons, main stage entertainment, arts and crafts fair, tethered balloon rides and a
wine venue featuring the Temecula Valley. Attendance in previous years has been
approximately 40,000 + people for the 3-day event.
B. The City of Temecula desires to be a Premier Sponsor of the 2001
Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
A. In exchange for the payment of $35,000.00, the City of Temecula shall be
designated as a "Premier Sponsor" of the 2001 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine
Festival. In exchange for being a Premier Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the
benefits as listed in Attachment A.
B. Any media visits prior to the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival
coordinated by the Festival or its public relations representatives will include an invitation
to visit all Temecula entities (i.e. Old Town, wineries, golf). Secondly, the Festival shall
include in its basic press kit a feature article of no less than three pages, which focuses
on the attractions of Temecula, including Old Town, golf, wineries, etc.) This
informational piece shall be provided to all media working with the Festival or its
representatives on Festival-related stories.
C. The TVBWF shall submit a written request to the City's Maintenance
Superintendent requesting any City owned light towers, cones, barricades, directional
signs, flashing beacons, etc. no later than 60 days preceding the first day of the Balloon
& Wine Festival. Any such materials provided is at the discretion of the Maintenance
Superintendent and shall be returned in the same condition as received.
D. All event tickets, parking passes and official Festival souvenir
merchandise shall be submitted to the City Manager no later than one full week
preceding the first day of the Festival.
E. Within 60 days following the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival,
TVBWA shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report
evaluating the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival event, its
attendance/demographics, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a
1
Premier Sponsor. The report should also include samples of media press clippings,
flyers, pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook format.
F. TVBWA agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its
elected officials, officer, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for
damage to persons or property by reason of TVBWA's acts or omissions or those of
TVBWA's employees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Temecula Valley
Balloon & Wine Festival to the maximum extent allowed by law.
G. TVBWA shall secure from a good and responsible company or
companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in
full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general
liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional
insured with TVBWA and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent
endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall;
1. Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured
covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Valley Balloon &
Wine Festival.
2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting
within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or
in connection with Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
(A) General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property
damage.
(B) Liquor Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property
damage.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against
the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the
Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival.
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is
provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any
reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return
receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand.
6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers,
officials and employees or TVBWA shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses
and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
2
H. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto,
concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
I. TVBWA shall promptly furnish the City, an independent certified public
accountant audit of the TVBWA financial statements, which will include FY July 1, 1999
- June 30,2000, by August 31,2000.
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
DATED:
TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON
& WINE ASSOCIATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
Carol Popejoy-Hime
General Manager
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
clfy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
4
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION EVENTS
-
.'
". ~:--:,. ~.' l;:. ~ . ~ ~.:""'i_.:._
- .-' ~~"~,4-.""
RtCtl'VtD
4PR
1 0 1000
~~@rn~ ~@I[OJ ~~~@@B~&B@/Q1
April 10, 2000
Economic Development Subcommittee
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, Ca 92590
Attn: James O'Grady
Assistant City Manager
The year 2000 marks the thirtieth year of the Temecula Town Association. We are a non-profit charitable
organization that is faithfully supported by many dedicated volunteers. Each of our fundraising events
requires a hnge amount of volunteer hours and our members and friends have always made themselves
available no matter the task.
When some of the local organizations including the Temecula Town Association start a fundraising event
we need all the help we can get to pull it off. After some amount of time we should be in a position that
the organizational efforts and the various commercial interests are such that hard work and a decent
product go a long way towards assuring success.
The Temecula Town Association is significantly modirying its funding request for the new fiscal year. In
the past the Temecula Town Association has asked the City of Temecula for $15,000.00 per event in
addition to all City generated costs. The City has been very generous to our organization in the past years
and we are very appreciative of that fact. However, we believe at this point that our three major fund
raisers are adequately controlled and they no longer require direct financial help from the City. For the
coming year we are asking for City generated costs and no actual dollars. As we add other fundraising
events and they become snccessful we hope that they too will be able to stand on their own two feet and
not necessitate continually requesting money each year. Although we are confident that our efforts will be
successful we hope that the Ternecula Town Association can request support from the City of Temecula in
the future if a specific fund raiser needs additional financial help.
Sincerel\'.
Qk~
folm Sterling ~
General Manager
Temccula Town Association
P.O. Box 435
Temecula, CA 92593
(909) 676-4718
Fax (909) 694-9216
Temecula Community Center
28816 Pujol Street
Temecula, CA 92590
@U@~@[pjW7[j/ '~," [0 [illJJ@[lli~~~
~:,J .. ;,'- '..0, ... ......J., )'" .' ., n <t .. .. ,0 _ ... . .... ..
"'.(_,-,~,-,i:~~,,,--...,~"",,,";,-~_;;,,,,,,,:~ ''t:~'./'-_ ~ ~t:-.J-{;i:-'::~~_,_~~,,~:': ::.",. ,-f:~_.;L~.~_~
lRolllleo * 'lI'Irm\CltOIr Jlb\\Ce * lRolllllRunnn
MAlRlKIE'JI'llN<G ANj[J) lP'lROMO'JI'TIONS
OVElRVJIEW:
The Temecula Town Association produces three ofTemecula's major events, all within the city
limits:
October 6, 7 and 8, 2000
February 16, 17 and 18,2001
May 25, 26 and 27, 2001
The Great Temecula Tractor Race
Temecu1a Rod Run
Frontier Days Rodeo in Temecula
Combined these three events bring over 70,000 guests to Temecula. These guests fill our
hotels, restaurants, and retail centers, contributing thousands of dollars to the local economy.
Due to the timing of each event, marketing and promotion of the City of Temecula is
virtually year-round. Long lead media for one event is being contacted at the same time local
promotions and advertising break for another. Because of this, the following marketing
outline encompasses all three events, and has utilized cross-promotion and package
marketing to maximize sponsorship dollars and recognition for the Temecula Town
Association.
All three events draw family audiences and are promoted as "family events." However, with
the unique nature of each event, they provide avenues for marketing and publicity of the City
of Temecula to unique interest groups that include:
~ Classic Car Owners/fans
~ Racing Fans
~ Rock n' Roll Fans
~ Collectors
~ Western and Horse Fans
~ Country Music Audiences
~ Sports fans
Marketing activities include cross market and promotional activities at other venues such as
car shows, auto races, other rodeo and horse-related events, as well as school children
through our Li1 Cowpoke's Rodeo and kids faire free programs.
As result of the 1999 Rodeo, Tractor Race and Rod Run 2000, the City of Temecula and
these three events had year round promotions resulting in more than 4-million impressions in
national and regional newspapers and magazines. Additionally these events spread the name
of "Temecula" through radio and television broadcasts, which reached millions of listeners
and viewers.
AA~@1ilO~ ~~O([; ~~[fil$ ~~
21705 Como sWeet 0 Wiklomor 0 ColWomia 92595
(909)676-1875 (909) 0 678-1456 0 fall (909) 678-5%7
II. TEMECULA ROD RUN
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
TEMECULA ROD RUN
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
The City of Temecula's benefits as a Special Event Sponsor of the 2001 Rod Run:
~ City log%r name will appear on press releases, advertisements, flyers, banners and
promotional items relating to the event (where applicable)
~ City name on event t-shirts
~ 10 VIP passes, and parking passes to the event
~ 6 general tickets per day
~ City of Temecula advertisement in the Official Rod Run Program (if applicable)
~ 5 event t-shirts
~ City of Temecula marketing and publicity pieces included in media kits
~ Dignitary invitation to any pre-event television events
~ First right-of-refusal for the 2002 Rod Run
O@M.@@Jrz~" ~ I@@!
I:=slblli'l\1Ialfl11 ~e~ ~1 all11ldl ~~
Ternecula's Rod Run 2,001 marks the 15th year for the City to host the Fint Rod Run of the season. Plans
are well underway to continue the tradition set by the Temecula Town Association of producing a clean,
professionally run, family event! Our 2000 included a pre-rod run kick off event, plus special guest
appearances of Ian and Dean, The Riddler Frank Gorshin, and Paul Lema!. Rod Run 2,001 will include
invitations to celebrity car buffs, special events and activities spread throughout the City of T ernecula, and
additional publicity events.
The Temecula Town Association assumed the lead role as event producer in 1997 after the dissolution of the
Mainstreet Association. The 1999 Rod Run saw one of the largest and most peaceful family oriented crowds
to attend a Temecula event. Police estimated the crowd size at 70,000 for the two days. Despite a rainy
Friday evening and Sunday morning, the event continued to draw a large crowd. Saturday's crowd was
equal to any other year's average day and Sunday had people happily donning their umbrellas.
The TTA staged several activities to extend the event's scope and benefits for the city. A woodies show was
held in the Temecula Towne Center on Saturday. Autographs and a special guest appearance ofJan and
Dean were also offered at the Ternecula Towne Center as well as a Saturday evening sock hop. The TTA
and Pechanga Entertainment Center also worked together to bring the Ian and Dean back to the beach night
to Pechanga.
Proceeds from the TTA events support local charities by providing land for both the Boys and Girls Club
and In-line Hockey Association. The IT A also produces the annual community Christmas dinner. In 1999
the TT A fed nearly 1,000 local residents and provided toys to dozens of children.
The Temecula Town Association Rod Run Committee will provide the following to the City of Ternecula:
o Recognition as a sponsor in publicity
o 10 VIP Passes, and parking passes to the event.
o City of Ternecula marketing and publicity pieces included in media kits
o Media exposure for city, old town and community via publicity and marketing.
o Dignitary invitation to any pre-event television events.
Marketing and publicity for the Rod Run will be conducted at car shows throughout the southland, in
car/rod and entertainment magazines and newspapers, on television and radio throughout Southern
California. Local marketing will include the Press Enterprise, The Californian, cable television, KOLA radio,
KA TY 101.3 FM, and local shoppers.
The Ternecula Town Association appreciates your sponsorship and support. We are committed to
preserving this valuable marketing tool for Old Town and the City of Ternecula and will make every effort to
establish the Ternecula Rod Run as a well-run showpiece event for Ternecula. If you have any questions or
suggestions regarding this sponsorship package or the Temecula Rod Run, please don't hesitate to ask. We
are anxious to earn your support and promise to provide a professionally run event!
d'@ffiA@@~~" ~ ~@@l/
Produced by the Temecula Town Association
P.O. Box 435 '" Temecula, CA 92593 '" (909) 676-4718 '" FAX (909) 694-9216
rAo:la-d,r'sl,olWlxi\s
II. TEMECULA ROD RUN
ATTACHMENT B - CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS
City Support Services and Costs for the Temecnla lRod ]Run
Below are the City generated services and their estimated costs provided to the Temecu1a
Town Association (TT A) for the Rod Run event.
Police Services
Staffing in various classifications is dependent upon event configuration and anticipated
needs.
Service costs: $20,000
Fire Services
Services include 5 Fire Safety Specialists, Com-33 Unit and Company 84
Service costs: $3,502
Public Works
Services include 5 maintenance workers, one-ton truck stake bed and barricades
Service costs: $3,000
Community Services
Service costs: $1,000
Building 8< Safety
Service costs: $1,000
Planning
Service costs: $ 800
TOTAlL SElRVJlCE COSTS: $29,302 est.
II. TEMECULA ROD RUN
ATTACHMENT C - 2001 ROD RUN MEDIA/PROMOTIONS CAMPAIGN
200ll TEMJEClUJLA JRO])) JRlUN
MAJlUGETJING TOOJLSI MJET1HIU]))S
BOTTLE NECK RIDERS
Through Coca-Cola and Budweiser, produce bottleneck riders promoting the Temecula Rod Run and
dates. Distribution to begin in September
WEBSITE/PAGE
Develop website page through Melody's Ad Works web site, Temeculacalifornia.com. Website will be
constantly re-submitted to search engines to assure top reading on website. Website will also be linked
to Chamber website promoting events.
FLYERSIPOSTERS
Flyers (5,000) will be printed the last week in January and distributed through grocery stores, Old Town
Temecula Restaurants, and hotels. Applications and flyers {I 0,000) will be distributed beginning in
August and continued through February at car shows and via car clubs. Posters will be displayed at
major centers and stores throughout Temecula, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta and Menifee Valley. The Press-
Enterprise will design the posters and program cover.
PROGRAMS
38,000 programs will be printed and 36,000 inserted in the Press-Enterprise southwest wne.
TABLE TENTS
Will be produced and distributed in Old Town Temecula restaurants and be on tables by January 9.
Table tents will be laser printed by Melody's Ad works.
B-ROLLS
Will be developed and distributed to all Television Stations and the ESPN extreme sports channel. An
invitation will be sent to all to film the events as well as announce the event on their sports, weather and
"community calendar" segments. B-roll will also be sent to Good Morning America and Hal Roker-
Today Show with the invitation to film from the Rod Run. We will invite Good Morning America to
shoot their "Good Morning America" shot from the Rod Run. If this is approved by GMA, we will also
invite local schools to fill the bleachers during the broadcast.
2001 Promotional Events
PlREVJl:EW - September 9 at 1l'emecula 1l'own Center
1l'lEMEClUU ROD RUN
PROMOTIONAlL SPONSORS 8< PAJln1~ERSJB[][JI>S
These sponsors will provide a combination of promotional support for the events while
providing some cash. Promotional contributions will include in-store displays, radio
commercial tags of events, sampling products at events, shelf talkers, neck riders, posters and
insert ads. (proposed at this time)
~O'U@ ~~arc~@M ~~
21705 Como SWeet 0 Wildomar 0 Cali10mia 92595
(909)676-7875 (9091 0 678-wa 0 I'CIll (909) 678-5%7
Promotional Sponsorships:
a. Albertson's Grocery Store"
b. Budweiser*
c. Fiji Water
Media Sponsors
1. KA TY 10 1.3 FM
2. Press-Enterprise
3. The Californian
4. The Pennysaver
5. KFXG 92.9 FM
6. KCXX
7. KolalKcal Radio
8. Ksets FM
9. Continental Cable
10. Tci Cable
Media Sponsors
11. KATY 101.3 FM
12. Press-Enterprise
13. The Californian
14. The Pennysaver
15. KCXX
16. Ko1a1Kcal Radio
17. Ksets FM
18. Kbest Fm San Diego
19. Continental Cable
20. Tci Cable
~<iiil1!1l1@ ~~O~~~@1U$ ~~
21705 Como SWest D Wildomar D eamomia 92595
(909) 676-7875 (909) D 678-14!6 D I'Gll (909) 678-5%7
JROD RUN
J?JROMOl'llONS AND MAJROCJl!T[NG
TllMlElLnNE
The following timeline is abbreviated, but displays the need for an "early start" on Rod Run
Promotions and Sponsorships.
AlIJGlJST
);> First right of refusal for presenting sponsorship and all sponsors sent out
);> Develop long lead media day and obtain sponsors
);> Order cars from Match Box
);> Distribute applications
SEn>1I'EMl8ElR
);> Mail long lead media calendar notices
);> Preview day
);> Armounce presenting sponsor.
);> Distribute applications.
);> Reserve any rooms needed for February.
OCTOBElR
);> Mail long lead media kits, announcements.
);> Distribute applications.
);> Promote Rod Run in Tractor Race Program.
);> Procure sponsorships and vendors
);> Prepare poster art and program art.
NOVlEMl8lElR
);> Continue sponsor sales.
);> Announce collectible car.
);> Armounce special activities.
);> Confirm media participation and promotion
);> Order B-rolls
);> Order billboard/have art ready.
);> Long lead media day
~<MlOrro@ ~~D~ ~~@'GU@:/\l$ ~~
21705 Como SWest 0 Wi!domar 0 Camomia 92595
(9091 676-7875(909) 0 678-1456 0 1'cIll(909) 678-5%7
.
DECEMBER
~ Conclude sponsorship sales.
~ Write copy for Rod Run Program.
~ Prepare media day invites for January.
~ Prepare advertisements
~ Prepare radio commercials
~ Table tents in local restaurants
JANUARY
~ Media day for locals
~ Submit copy for Program
~ Announce dance entertainment
~ Distribute and display posters
~ Distribute and display flyers.
~ Hang Banners (the ones that are still hanging)
~ Schedule Ads
~ Billboard starts
~ Radio advertising starts
lFElRllWARY
~ Continue with press
~ Program release 1 week before event
~ Distribute flyers through grocery stores
~ Prepare sponsorship packets
~ Set up press rides for poker run
~ Set up press photos for any star cars
~ Follow up press at event.
~~fl'a\ID~~D~~@a'O$~
2l705 Como Sireei 0 Wildomor 0 CaIi10mIa 92595
(909) 676-7875 (909) 0 678-WS6 0 Fcm (909) 678-5%7
II. TEMECULA ROD RUN
ATTACHMENT D - 2000 ROD RUN MEDIA/PROMOTIONS RECAP
If@lIDD@~(![]llc!] !%@@] ffi.(![l!Jj) ~@@@
Velelfision COVIlIIi'ii1S)1l!l 01 E"IlIIi1~ i!li'u! tllill Ci~ oq TI2IMKU!i!I'8 IIlSimllll on
),> 6 Major Los Angeles and San Diego Network Stations, including ABC,
NBC, KCOP AND KCAL
),> Saturday morning, NBC News San Diego February 12
};> Local cable coverage on Sarah Coleman Show, community
announcernents and psas on fel andMedie. Q.na.'<~"!:':
)> OCN ...'Clmnge.CaUi1ty CabfeNeWslspotrlghf'"'''., .... ....., ....
R21~IO covllIIra~o~~'~.~i!lAUi11~~1i1"~~iUngSli8~i~~;;~~~iy 3/4 Jft ILL.';
million. .... ." .. , .. . . .' . ""'. . '. . , LV
. ..... ....~ . . 'I:""'.. I~''.''
Rfiajor S~tions~,,"~m:~tS19 @Ie~~~:; , ..~ .. '''~ ~
.:.r'~'.'.. . ..... "., .......... ~,..
. '-". .
. .. ,....,.. .....:..".-
~... ..~. f) '.' ..... """".:",.~.
. 11': c,' "
.'" : ':' Q>' "' 0
,
,
),> KWRP ,.
),> KOlAlKCAL
.),> !<ATY RadiQ
),> KFROGRadio
)> KOES'
}'> KFWB
'~
~, ""';;!;"
Pub!lci~. pra$Sr~IIlII~SiiSlll mrl
n2l1li001ml pubDic2l~onSi tlotlllingo ~
'-', .~
~alf Na~oi1Sli ~nCll R'l'gie.il~i~Ubliei!l.tiO~'"
'" 'AI h....... . ...... . '. .
p vves..;;<>ys...... ..,. . ". ......
),> Inland Em .. .... . ,...., ..' . .
),> Ornn . ..
)> San
),> San D~~i1':r:71buile,'h~m ..: ..
):> Saln Gabriel VSlIley Business Journal
):> Ths Scout
):> Winellf publiCClltions
~ Inland Valley DBlily Bulletin, numerous
). San Bernardino Sun, numerous
):> Desert Sun
~ Los Angel~s iirnes, twice
). Additional press cOllerage in the Hemet News, La Jolla Light, At Ease,
Sun Tribune, Sun City News, Redlands Daily Facts, North County Times,
ThIS Ent0rtainsr, The VBllley News (MoI'l;lIno Valley), ValllSlY Business
~:\.;;~; .:.,::"
~
ProduC!d by Melody'. Ad Work.
2000
lS-d
.!.9tos SL9 696
S~~OM.a~-SAaO'3W Wd Ll=se eeeZ-1Z-Nnr
Journal, Corona Independent, Anza Valley Outlook, Perris Progress
Bulletin, llInd tha Friday Flyer
Advl!riieinl9) in neWS[l)Slp0i'll\ elnd on radio \/21ILllmd Sl~ S~qj.OOO J ~ l
Public 11'Gl1l'J~iol'llm Cln(ll] I'l!!lblici~ ~Iil S'ilD.COD,
Advoi1ilainllll W~8 ccnllll!Acihltlll wi~:
j:> Th~ Pr~OlOl.~n~r!Jrigtlll
).> Th~ ~~nn"MVl!r
)'> ~oU\ ~&cgl@
)). ~qrol2llR~dICl
).> AA'N i'tmllloo
)'> 1WlI~~'~~~ig .
)). Th(!) C~IfiVOrDllI&lB1
).> Inl21nlll EnRor$1if.irn'!!lUl.t Rourid~ '
)). i\'ltlllifilJh~-rc:l" ",..
)'> Tha ~illnchO ~ws ,.....
.' .,'
"
. ;:Xl;~.'
i..
. .:''''tP''''' 'o;'~'
. .:.....r,::
,'C' ,.
ro" H.
ii .~
f -
... .",'
., no:'
.,IP.'
",r.
... .,~. .. ,_ no_
.l~.
n._.. ......
':'-." 1/1-'
.n.' .
, :1 :~~: .",.
,""tlll.
:. -"ill
." !,~:
".:
a
-, :~,::r.....
IJ
~..
. ;:'~~~1~~:~~:;'~1
{J' ,.
. ~~~:~~
,': ......":~~-."'.i..':~
:lL.... .
Ll:2.\!. . "M
:~iil::'; .It'.
..
ProdUced by Molody'o Ad Wor1Cll
2CCC
Z:S-d
L9toS 8L9 606
S~~OM-a~.SAaOI3W Wd 81:Se 0ee~-1~-Nnr
II. TEMECULA ROD RUN
ATTACHMENT E - SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT AND
MODEL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A][WElRnS][NG AGlRlEEMEN'f BETWEEN
CITY OF 'fEMECULA ANlIJi
'fEMECULA 'fOWN ASSOC][A. nON
This Agreement, made this 11th day of July. 2000, by and between the CITY OF
TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, a
California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as ("TT A").
A. TTA will operate the "Temecula Rod Run" on February 16 - 18, 2001. The
Temecula Rod Run is a special event located in Old Town Temecula involving the display of
classic cars. Attendance in previous years has been between 25,000 to 40,000+ people for the
event.
B. The City of Temecula desires to be a "Special Event Sponsor" of the 2001
Temecula Rod Run.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
A. In exchange for providing for the Rod Run of approximately $30,000 for all city-
support costs of Public Works, Fire and Police, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a
"Special Event Sponsor" of the 2001 Temecula Rod Run. In the event that City support services
exceeds $30,000, the sponsor may seek City authorization for payment above that amount. In
exchange for being a Special Event Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the benefits as
listed in Attachment A.
B. Within 60 days following the Rod Run, TTA shall prepare and submit to the
Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Rod Run, its attendance, and describing
the materials in which the City was listed as a Special Event Sponsor. The report should also
include samples of media press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook
format.
C. The TTA shall file Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications
with the City of Temecula no later than 90 days preceding the first day of the Rod Run event.
D. Once the Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications have been
submitted and the event agreement has been executed in final form, the TT A will receive
sponsorship payment.
E. TT A agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected
officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to
persons or by reason of TT A's acts or omissions or those of TT A's employees, officers, agents,
or invites in connection with the Temecula Rod Run to the maximum extent allowed by law.
F. TT A shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing
insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the
duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in
1
which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with TT A and shall furnish
a Certificate of Liability by the City (refer to Attachment D). Notwithstanding any inconsistent
statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by
the policy shall;
1. Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering
all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Rod Run.
2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the
scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out
of, or in connection with Temecula Rod Run.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
(A) General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(B) Liquor Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City,
its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the
Temecula Rod Run.
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided
that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for
any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days
beforehand.
6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved
by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its
officers, officials and employees or TT A shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses.
G. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the
provIsions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees,
in addition to any other reliefto which it may be entitled.
H. The Rod Run event must be held within the City of Temecula limits.
I. The TTA will need to adhere to the Rod Run Model Conditions of Approval
which are included as an attachment to the Contract Agreement. Any violation of this
document is subject to termination of the advertising agreement between the City and TTA.
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
DATED:
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
John Sterling, General Manager
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
3
"
, .-
"
JP'!ROJP'OSEJ[])
MOJ[])ElL iCONJ[])ITTKONS OF AJP'JP'!RO'V AlL
!ROJ[]) !RlUN 2001
February _,2001
Mr. John Sterling
Temecula Town Association
P.O. Box 435
Temecula, CA 92593
Subject:
Planning Application No. PA_-_ (Temporary Use Permit) for the 2001
Rod Run located in Old Town Temecula on February _, _, 6:00 AM -
5:00 AM and February _, _, 6:00 AM - 5:00 PM,
Dear Mr. Sterling:
Planning Application No. PA_-_ is hereby approved subject to the following conditions of
approval:
City of Temecula Planning Department
I. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any
agency. or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any
and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality
thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek
monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality
thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the
voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application PA_-_ which action is brought
within the appropriate statute oflimitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13,
Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152
and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or
proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall further cooperate fully in the
F:\Depts\PLANNING\Planning Files\2001 ROD RUN MODEL CONDlTIONS.doc
I
defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully,
permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold
harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees,
or agents.
2. The following liability insurance requirements apply to the Temecula Town Association
(TTA) as the main sponsor of the 2000 Rod Run: General Liability ($2,000,000) and Liquor
Liability ($2,000,000).
3. The insurance carrier selected by the Temecula Town Association (TTA) must have a
minimum A rating. Along with the Certificate ofInsurance identifying coverage limits, the
carrier must also sign the Additional Insured Endorsement for the City of Ternecula and the
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency.
4. The Temecula Town Association (TTA) shall require that all participating food and non-food
vendors identified on Exhibit C and the private security company used for this event provide
evidence of general liability insurance in the amount of $1 ,000,000. The certificates must
show the City of Temecula, City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency and the (TTA) as
additional insured.
5. All insurance certificates shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Temecula
Finance Department no later that February _,2001.
6. All food and non-food vendors who are approved to be located in the road right-of-way
areas of the site plan for this event shall not set up prior to 5:00 AM on February _'
2001.
7. All food and non-food vendors shall display a laminated authorization card provided by the
applicant indicating the name of the vendor and space number.
8. This event is approved for February _,2001 from 6:00 AM - 5:00 PM. and February _,
2001 from 6:00 AM - 5:00 PM. per the approved business plan (Old Town activities only),
Exhibit B. All Conditions of Approval shall supersede the approved Business Plan.
9. The Temecula Town Association (TTA) shall obtain written permission from private
property owners of all parcels used for the bypass road between Mercedes St. and First St.,
parking lots, car display areas and vendor locations. Documentation of this written
permission shall be provided to the City of Temecula Planning Department thirty (30) days
prior to the start of the event.
10. All on-street car display parking within the event area shall be parallel in order to maintain
required emergency access.
F:\Depts\PLANNING\Planning Files\2001 ROD RUN MODEL CONDlTIONS.doc2
11. The event shall be developed per the approved site plan, Exhibit A,
City of Temecula Building and Safety Department
12. Code Enforcement Officers shall be assigned to the event on February _,2001 and February
,2001.
13. An adequate amount of handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as indicated on the
approved site plan, Exhibit A. Parking lots and spaces shall be clearly marked for
handicapped use.
14. Off-site signs are not allowed in the City ofTemecula without authorization from all property
owners and the Community Development Director/Deputy City Manager. Applicants shall
obtain permits from the City of Temecula Planning Department for all approved sign
locations.
City of Temecula Public Works Department
13. The applicant shall submit a completed Special Event Package Application to the City of
Temecula Public Works Department no later than 90 days prior to the event with the $100
application fee.
14. All off-street parking shall be accessed through existing curb cut driveway approaches only.
No entry shall be permitted over standard curbs.
15. All No Parking restrictions throughout the event must be adhered to.
16. No participant shall use, sell or distribute any self-adhesive stickers during this event.
Riverside County Fire Department
17. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from
the Riverside County Fire Department dated February _,2001.
F,IDeptsIPLANNINGIPlanning Files12001 ROD RUN MODEL CONDITIONS. doc
J
Riverside County Health Department
18. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from
the Riverside County Health Department dated February _,2001.
Temecula Police Department
19. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from
the Temecula Police Department dated February _,2001.
Temecula Community Services Department
20. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from
the Temecula Community Services Department dated February _,2001.
Should you have any further questions regarding these conditions, please do not hesitate to contact
me at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Knute Noland
Development Processing Coordinator
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the
above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that any changes I may wish
to make to the event shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
John Sterling
Applicant
F:\Depts\PLANNING\Planning Files\2001 ROD RUN MODEL CONDITIONS. doc
4
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE
.&3200 Business Park Orin 9 Temecwa -0 CA 0 92~90 0 Telephone (909)694-6405 -0 (ax (909)!06.S169
SPECIAL EVENT CONDITIONS of APPROVAL
TO:
Temecula Town Association
DATE:
February _, 2001
SUBJECT:
PA -
--
Rod Run 2001 February _,_ &_,2001
ATTENTION:
John Sterling
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
1. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROAD, A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OF UNOBSTRUCTED
WIDTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH OUT THE EVENT. SEE SITE PLAN FOR
LOCATION OF ACCESS ROAD. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
2. BOOTHS, TENTS OR CANOPIES. A MINIMUM SEPARATION FROM ANY
PROPERTY LINE. BUILDING, OTHER TENT. CANOPY, TEMPORARY MEMBRANE
STRUCTURE SHALL BE 20 FEET. THE DISTANCE TO THE PARKING OF
AUTOMOBILES OR OTHER INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES SHALL BE 30
FEET (CFC 3205. Table 3205-A)
3. GAS-. SOLlD- AND L1QUID-FUEL-BURNING COOKING EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE
LOCA TED WITHIN 30 FEET OF ANY TENT OR CANOPY. (CFC 3217.3)
4. POST 'NO SMOKING' SIGNS IN THE TENTS AND CANOPIES. (CFC 3208)
5. TENTS AND CANOPIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CFC SECTION 3207 AND
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 19 SECTION 335; THEY SHALL BE
LABELED OR PROVIDE CERTIFICATION OF FLAME-RETARDANT AS REQUIRED
BY THE STA TE FIRE MARSHAL
6. PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS IN THE VENDOR AREA SPACED NO MORE THAN
75 FEET FROM ANY LOCATION. ANY SINGLE TENT OR CANOPY SHALL HAVE
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS FOLLOWS:
a. 200 to 500 square feet of floor area One 2-A: 10-B:C
b. 501 to 1.000 square feet of floor area: Two 2-A:10-B:C
c. Each additional 2.000 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof: One 2-A:10-
B:C
d. THIS EVENT REQUIRES TWO (2) EXTINGUISHERS, ON AT EACH END OF
THE CANOPY IN EACH BEER GARDEN. (CFC 3209)
7. PROVIDE A 40-B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHER AT ALL COOKING LOCATIONS WITH
DEEP-FAT FRYERS. ALL OTHERS TO HAVE A MINIMUM 2A:10BC FIRE
EXTINGUISHER. (CFC 2504.3.3)
8. CONCESSION STANDS UTILIZED FOR COOKING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 10
FEET CLEARANCE ON TWO SIDES. (CFC 2504.3.2)
9. EXTENSION CORDS SHALL BE OF A COMMERCIAL TYPE AND BE IN GOOD
WORKING CONDITION. EXTENSION CORDS SHALL NOT BE SUBJECTED TO
PHYSICAL DAMAGE. NO DAMAGED CORDS OR MULTI-HEAD CORDS WILL BE
ALLOWED. EXTENSION CORDS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 85
OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE.
10. HAY OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED
AS GROUND COVER. HAY. STRAW, TRASH AND OTHER SIMILAR FLAMMABLE
MA TERIAL SHALL NOT BE STORED WITHIN 50 FEET OF ANY TENT.
11. ALL FLAMMABLE VEGETATION WITHIN 50 OF ANY TENT SHALL BE REMOVED.
12. AT EACH BEER GARDEN PROVIDE AN APPROVED EXIT SIGN AT REQUIRED
EXITS AND WHERE OTHERWISE NEEDED TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE
DIRECTION OF EGRESS. TWO (2) EXITS ARE REQUIRED, EACH FOUR (4) FEET
WIDE. EACH HALF THE DIAGONAL DISTANCE OF THE AREA APART. (CFC TABLE
3211-A)
13. ALL FOOD SERVING VENDORS SHALL SIGN THE 'FOOD VENDOR' LETTER AND
BE INSPECTED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION STAFF BEFORE ANY COOKING IS
DONE.
14. THERE SHALL BE TWO (2) FIRE PREVENTION STAFF ON DUTY TO MONITOR
THESE CONDITIONS AND TO WORK WITH EVENT STAFF TO MAINTAIN FIRE
PROTECTION AND THE ELIMINATION OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY H/,ZARDS. (CFC
103.2.1.1 and Title 19 section 320) The cost will be paid by the City Fire budget.
Call the Fire Prevention Bureau at (909) 694-6405 to schedule an inspection and issuance of a
Fire Department permit prior to the event.
If you have any questions contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at (909) 694-6405.
Sincerely,
Norm Davidson
Fire Safety Specialist
nPLAl'\fNINGIPA99-0508 Rod RUII 2000 - FIRE COA.doc
COl'0;TY OF RIVERSIDE
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARHlENT OF ENVlRONi\lENTAL IIEALTl!
DATE: January 5. 2000
.---:----:--:-.:---
c
f:ROt"l
RE:
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~: Knute N~~. pra,r:n~r
~~ironmental Health Specialist III
MINOR OUTDOOR EVENT/PA99-0508 - (Annual Temecula Rod Run :=+
~
..::: ,
TO:
The Department of Environmemal Health has reviewed the Minor Outdoor Event and has the
following comments:
APPLICANT TO PROVlDE:
l. Toilets at the rate as per Riverside COllnly Resoltllion #9]-474. Under Ordinance #711.
At least seventeen (17) male and twenty-three (13) female.
Three of which must be for handicapped.
~
Provide a 32-gallon refuse container for each 100 persons.
3. Adequate safe supply of potable water. (bottled water to be stored on-site).
4. All food facilities must contact District Environmental Health Services (Bonnie Dierking)
at (909) 694-5022 to obtain proper approval/permits.
l'omact Person:
John Sterling - 676-4718
Dates of event:
February 11th and 13'11.1000
Estimated daily auendance:
50,000 over two days
Event location:
Old Town Temecula (Arch to Arch)
Hours ()f operation:
6:00 AM - 4:00 PM
CH:dr
(909) 955-8980
cc: Bonnie Dierking
,lhl..:,JOl:
Knute.Nbland - Rod Run Model Conditions 2001.doc
Page 1 !
1lemecula Police Department
Memorandum
Dale: April 20, 2000
To: Knute Noland, Development Processing Coordinator
From: Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police
Re: 2001 Rod Run Model Conditions - Updated
In response to your memorandum dated March 23, 2000, I have the following information you
requested.
Cost Projection:
The year 2000 Rod Run was affected by inclement weather. The weather conlributed to the
lowering ofthe costs incurred by Ihe Police Department, due to the reduction of manpower. The
Police Departmenl using full time officers, Reserve officers, Community Service Officers and
Explorers staffed this event. Actual costs for this evenl were $14,746.24. Police Department
billing for this event was projected at $18,000.00.
This event did allow for shift adj ustments for Police staff to accommodate slaffing. Fulure evenls
will be separale from regular patrol deploymenls and will be billed accordingly. This will
demonstrate the lrue Police costs associated with this event. Future costs projected for the 2001
Rod Run will be in excess of $20,000.00 due to increases in salary, contract rates, amounl of
Reserve officers used etc.
Model Conditions:
The following are some of Ihe conditions that the Police Departmenl would like 10 see for this
event. Recognizing that this event is growing each year and that it continues to utilize a large
amount of City resources, it is no longer a "small, local event" and should not be managed as
such.
1. Police aClivity should begin the day prior to the event to monitor the vendor set up and assist
with traffic control for the vendors.
2. No vendors will be allowed to set up on public slreets/sidewalks prior to the event starting lime
unless they are under the direct supervIsion of police personnel and the roadway has been closed
to the public.
3. Vendors must not leave their equipment unattended at any time.
L_
, Knute NDland - Rod Run Model Conditions 2001.doc
Page 2 I
4. The command post location for Ihe Police Department should be restricled to emergency
vehicles only (no longer shall motor homes occupy the same space). This area shall be posted
several days prior to Ihe event and any unauthorized vehicles will be towed.
5. A representative of the Temecula Town Association who has decision making authority,
shall be in direct contact with the police command pOSI at all times while this event is in progress
(this will resull in efficiency of communications, the resolution of disputes between vendors etc).
6. No other special evenl permit shall be authorized for Ihe Sam Hicks park for the duralion
of the Rod Run weekend.
7. In the interest of Public Safety, dogs shall be banned from Ihe event (The only exemption
to this shall be registered guide dogs for disabled persons or Police Service Dogs). This condition
will require the Temecula Town Associalion to publish this announcement on any flier or
publication related 10 this event immediately.
8. Any person serving alcoholic beverages shall not consume alcohol during the limes of
this event. Any person found to be in violalion of this condition will forfeil the participation of
the company they are representing the following year in this event.
9. The Temecula Town Association will be required to have 2 message boards from
CalTrans strategically localed on 1-15 prior to Winchester Road and between Winchester and
Rancho California Road on I-IS. This will decrease the amount of congestion on City streels
from traffic relaled to this evenl and ease Iraffic flow in the area.
10. The use of 6' chain link fences for any area serving alcoholic beverages (beer gardens)
shall be the minimum standard for this event.
II. Alcoholic beverages served during Ihis evenl musl be kept in the designated fenced in
areas. The Police Department will continue to enforce any violation of open conlainers on City
streels.
12. The Temecula Town Association will be responsible for having an on sile coordinator
after regular business hours during this event.
13. The chosen coordinator from the Temecula Town Associalion, shall not consume
alcoholic beverages from Friday evening (at the time of road closures, vendor set up, etc.) until
the event site has been cleaned to the approval of the representative of the City of Temecula
Public Works Departmeni on Sunday aflemoon.
14. The Temecula Town Associalion will be responsible for providing security for vendors
who leave their equipment at staging localions during the hours pending the event start time the
following day.
Should you have any questions, please call me.
.'
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Knute Noland, Development Processing Coordinator
FROM: WKevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: April 11, 2000
SUBJECT: 2001 Rod Run Conditions
Please include the attached conditions/comments in the agreement with the TTA.
o Please provide a layout of the proposed vendor locations. Include request for
electrical service, uses and description of set up. (2 weeks prior to event).
o Designate a specified set up period for all vendors. TCSD will provide oversight of
set up to ensure that no stakes are used and to minimize potential damage to City
property and landscaped areas.
o Use of stakes to support canopies, fences or any structures is strictly prohibited.
o All electrical hookups shall be inspected and approved by the Building & Safety
Department prior to energizing any vendor,
o Additional trash dumpsters (3 Yard) shall be provided at all designated parking areas.
Including (2) at the Mary Phillips Senior Center and (2) at the Temecula Community
Center. These dumpsters shall be provided by the TTA.
o Additional trash receptacles shall be provided throughout the Old Town area.
o All trash and debris shall be cleaned up and remove from the Old Town area by 8:00
A.M. the following Monday.
o Designated TTA representative shall walk the Old Town area with a TCSD and PW
representative at 8:30 A.M, the following Monday to ensure the site has been
cleaned to the satisfaction of the City.
If you have any questions regarding any of my comments do not hesitate to call.
4/11/00
III. FRONTIER DAYS RODEO
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
FRONTIER DAYS RODEO
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
The City of Temecula's benefits as a Special Event Sponsor of the 2001 Frontier Days
Rodeo:
o City log%r name will appear on press releases, advertisements, flyers, banners and
promotional items relating to the event (where applicable)
o City of Temecula banner/name displayed at the arena throughout the weekend
o City advertisement in the Official Rodeo Program (if applicable)
o 10 VIP passes to all three rodeo performances
o 6 General Admission tickets per day to the event
o 5 event souvenirs (where applicable)
o Logo recognition on flyers and day sheets
o Invitation to all media events and media days
o First right-of-refusal for the 2002 Frontier Days Rodeo
TEMECTJLA TOWN AssOCIATION
FRONTIER :OA ~
~~B~8
1F~~ru&1i1f ~ s, ~ 1 ~U1JdJ ~ $\
Frontier Days Rodeo has become a Memorial Day tradilion! What started in Lake Elsinore 25 years ago,
Temecula has made great with a permanent rodeo arena and activities Ihroughout Ihe city. The millennium
2001 Frontier Days Rodeo will be May 25, 26 and 27 in Temecula. A PRCA sanctioned event, Fronlier
Days Rodeo draws nalional exposure Ihrough !he PRO-RODEO news, PRCA websile, and PRCA-Nalional
sponsors like Wrangler Jeans, Dodge Truck, and Coca-Cola.
We are asking the cily of Temecula to once again sponsor this important part of our city's herilage.
Activilies will include Ihe free Lil' Cowpokes Rodeo on Friday, Ihe 261h, and Old Town Temecula
entertainment events.
The Temecula Town Associalion Rodeo Committee will provide the following 10 the City of Temecula:
o Recognition as a sponsor in publicily
o City of Temecula banner/name displayed al!he arena throughout !he weekend
o 10 VIP passes and lickets to alllhree rodeo perfonnances
o Media exposure for the city, old lown Temecula and the community via publicity and
markeling
o Invilation to all media events and media days
The Rodeo draws an attendance of 10,000 for three performances, over 100 cowboys from the Western
United Slales, and over 300 children for the free Friday performance. The Temecula Town Association is a
501 C 3 association wit proceeds benefiting local charities.
PO Box 435, 'l'Ilm:CULA, CA 92589
PIloNE (909) 6'16-471tl OR (909) 6'7ll-1456 FAX (900) 694-9216
tLl:f_':";(~_'~'~X-h-::J
III. FRONTIER DAYS RODEO
ATTACHMENT B - CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS
City Support Services and Costs for the ]Frontier lIJiays lRodeo
Below are the City generated services and their estimated costs provided to the Temecula
Town Association (TT A) for the Frontier Days Rodeo event.
Police Services
Staffing in various classifications is dependent upon event configuration and anticipated
needs.
Service costs: $5,000
]Fire Services
Services include 3 Fire Safety Specialists and Company 84
Service costs: $ 865
Public Works
Services include 2 maintenance workers, one-ton truck stake bed and barricades
Service costs: $ 500
Building & Safety
Service costs: $ 400
Planning
Service costs: $ 150
TOTAL SElRVlICE COSTS: $6,915 est.
III. FRONTIER DAYS RODEO
ATTACHMENT C - 2000 RODEO MEDIA/PROMOTIONS RECAP
Media clippings continue to be compiled as the event was held this past Memorial Day
weekend. For a sampling of media coverage refer to the Frontier Days Rodeo section
in the attached agenda report.
III. FRONTIER DAYS RODEO
ATTACHMENT D - SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
AIDiVlElR'f][S][NG AGlRlEEMENT BETWEEN
Cli'f\' OF TEMlECULA ANlIJi
'flEMECUlLA TOWN ASSOCMnON
This Agreement, made this 11th day of Julv. 2000, by and between the CITY OF
TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, a
California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "TT A").
A. TTA will operate the "Frontier Days Rodeo" on May 2S - 27, 2001, including the Lil
Cowpokes Rodeo on May 25, 2001 and Old Town Temecula entertainment events. Over the past
few years the event was held at the Northwest Sports Complex at Diaz and Winchester Roads.
Due to the planned development of the proposed Northwest Sports Park at this site, the TTA will
need to select an alternate site to be located within the City of Temecula limits.
This event features official rodeo performance events, vendor areas featuring food, drinks, retail
sales and children activities. Attendance in previous years has been approximately 10,000
spectators for the weekend.
B. The City of Temecula desires to be a "Special Event Sponsor" of the 2001
Frontier Days Rodeo, provided that the event is held within the city limits of the City of
Temecula. In the event that such a location cannot be found, this agreement is null and void.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
A. In exchange for providing for the Frontier Days Rodeo of approximately $7,000
for all city-support costs of Public Works, Fire and Police, the City of Temecula shall be
designated as a "Special Event Sponsor" of the 2001 Frontier Days Rodeo. In the event that City
support services exceeds $7,000, the sponsor may seek City authorization for payment above that
amount. In exchange for being a Special Event Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the
benefits as listed in Attachment A
B. Within 60 days following the Frontier Days Rodeo, TT A shall prepare and submit
to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Frontier Days Rodeo, its
attendance, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a Special Event Sponsor.
The report should also include samples of media press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc. in a
presentation notebook format.
C. The TT A shall file Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications,
if required for street closures, with the City of Temecula no later than 45-60 days preceding the
first day of the Frontier Days Rodeo event.
D. Once the Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications have been
submitted and the event agreement has been executed in final form, the TT A will receive
sponsorship payment.
4
E. TT A agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected
officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to
persons or property by reason of TTA's acts or omissions or those of TTA's employees,
officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Frontier Days Rodeo to the maximum extent
allowed by law.
F. TTA shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing
insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the
duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in
which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with TT A and shall furnish
a Certificate of Liability by the City (refer to Attachment D). Notwithstanding any inconsistent
statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by
the policy shall;
1. Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering
all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Frontier Days Rodeo.
2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the
scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with
the Frontier Days Rodeo.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
(A) General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(B) Liquor Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Frontier Days Rodeo.
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided
that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason
whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand.
6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved
by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible
or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or TT A shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
G. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement,
the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to
any other relief to which it may be entitled.
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
DATED:
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
John Sterling, General Manager
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
6
IV. THE GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
GREAT TEi\ilECULA TRACTOR RACE
ATTACHMENT A - SPONSORSHIP PACKAGE
The City of Temecula's benefits as a Special Event Sponsor of the 2000 Great
Temecula Tractor Race:
~ City log%r name will appear on press releases, advertisements, flyers, posters,
banners and promotional items relating to the event (where applicable)
~ City advertisement in the Official Tractor Race Program (if applicable)
~ Recognition at special media events and activities held prior to the event, such as
"Race Against Drugs" race night, television news broadcasts, and media day
~ 5 event souvenirs (where applicable)
~ 10 VIP Passes and 6 General Admission tickets per day to the Great Temecula
Tractor Race
~ First right-of-refusal for the 2001 Great Temecula Tractor Race
The 24ih Annual
Greai Temecula Tracior Race
Produced by the Temecula TOWIl Association
October 6, 7 and S
Celebrating 24 years of Tractor Race Fun, this is the only event of its kind in the United States
and a media favorite. Over 100 tractors of all shapes and sizes race on an oval dirt track. Tractors
range from garden lawnmowers to large farm diesel tractors. The "anything goes" class includes
just about anything with four wheels and an engine. Here tractors are made of old car parts, and
hybridized tractors. All tractors have to pass through the 100-foot long mud bog, located at the
grand stand side of the track. Other activities include: Friday Casino Night, Kids Country with
music workshops by Musicians Workshop and Bluegrass bands, a kids circus, the kids paint the
tractor, mud volleyball and muddy tug of wars. Saturday's concert featuring top blues
performers, and bluegrass bands. Promoted through newspapers, radio, cable television and local
direct mail shoppers, the event draws 20,000 spectators. Television stations over the years have
found this event great for footage, with special features airing on FOX, KTLA, KCAL, and
KABC and NBC sports broadcasts.
Mud volleyball offered a $1000 purse and had a field of over 30 teams. Clubs, restaurants, radio
stations and individual spectators in teams of four and six competed for two full days, providing
muddy excitement.
The Temecula Town Association Rodeo Committee will provide the following to the City of
Temecula:
c Recognition as a sponsor in publicity
c City of Temecula hanner/name displayed at the arena throughout the weekend
c 10 VIP passes and tickets to all events
c Media exposure for the city, old town Temecula and the community via publicity and
marketing
c Invitation to all media events and media days
P.O. Box 435, Temecula, CA 92589
Phone (909) 676-4718 or (909) 678-1456 or Fax (909) 678-5467
j;i'''-7'uJr.>":,,,
IV. THE GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE
ATTACHMENT B - CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS
City Support Services and Costs for the Great 'femecula 'fractoI' Race
Below are the City generated services and their estimated costs provided to the Temecula
Town Association (TT A) for the Great Temecula Tractor Race event.
Police Services
Staffing in various classifications is dependent upon event configuration and anticipated
needs.
Service costs: $10,000
Fire Services
Services include 2 Fire Safety Specialists, Com-33 Unit and Company 84
Service costs: $2,500
Public Works
Services include 2 maintenance workers, one-ton truck stake bed and barricades
Service costs: $ 500
Building &; Safety
Service costs: $ 400
Planning
Service costs: $ 300
'fO'fAJL SElRVJ[CE COS'fS: $13,700 est.
IV. THE GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE
ATTACHMENT C - 2000 MARKETING/ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN
GREATTEMECULAT~CTO~~CE
MIAIRKJETllNG TOOJLS! METJHIUUlS
WEBSITEIPAGE
Develop website page through Melody's Ad Works web sile. Websile will be constanlIy re-submitled 10
search engines 10 assure top reading on websile. Websile will also be linked to Chamber websile
promoting events.
FLYERSIPOSTERS
Flyers (60,000) will be printed Ihe last week in August and distributed Ihrough grocery stores,
McDonald's Restaurants, and hotels by Labor Day Weekend. Posters will be displayed at major centers
and stores throughout Temecula, Lake Elsinore, Munieta and Menifee Valley. The Press-Enterprise will
design the posters and program cover.
PROGRAMS
43,000 programs will be printed and 38,000 inserted in the Press-Enterprise southwesl zone.
TABLE TENTS
Will be produced and distributed in Old Town T emecula restaurants and be on tables by Labor Day
weekend. Table lenls will be laser printed by Melody's Ad works.
B-ROLLS
Will be developed and distributed 10 all Television Stations and the ESPN extreme sports channel. An
invilation will be sent 10 all to film Ihe evenls as well as announce Ihe event on their sports, weather and
"community calendar" segments. B-roll will also be sent to Good Morning America and Hal Roker-
Today Show willi Ihe invitation to film from the Tractor Race. We will invite Good Morning America
10 shoot their "Good Morning America" shot from the Tractor Race Sile. If this is approved by GMA,
we will also invite local schools 10 fill the bleachers during the broadcast.
lRAJI)][Oi T1ICKIE'f J!>lROMOnONS
Ticket giveaways will be offered to select Classic Rock stations for the Saturday Tractor Races.
Counlry stalions will be offered Sunday lickets. Tickel giveaways will be offered only wilh "PSA" and
on-air promotional agreemenls, providing free PSAs and commercials for Ihe Great Temecula Tractor
Race.
AA~~~~D(1:~~~~
21705 Como SWeet 0 Wildomar 0 Collfomia 92595
(9091676-7875 (909) 0 678-1456 0 I'cm (909) 678-5%7
GlRlEA'f 'flEMlECULA 'flRAC'fOlR lRACE
JPR.OMOnONAL .!EVENTS:
lRACEAGA][NS'fDlRUGSffiACEmGH'fOU'f
lFllUIDA Y, OC'fOBER 6th - 3 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Stage a Race Night OutJRace Against Drugs program in conjunction with the national
program. Invite race drivers (locals) to the track for autograph signing. Invite "World
of Outlaws" from Perris Auto Speedway (Their finals are October 31), NHRA drivers
(Pomona Raceway) and NASCAR drivers (Fontana and Orange Show). This event
would be promoted through the School Districts, offering free viewing of the time
trials, autographs, and possible "race souvenirs" from the different organizations.
In addition, Kathy Ireland, Jay Leno, Tide and Kmart will be invited to participate
through sponsorships and promotions. We'll prepare a b-roll for Jay Leno and send a
package in July discussing the program and inviting him to attend the Great
Temccula Tractor Race as our official "starter".
'flRAC'fOlRlRACErAlRAlIliE
lFllUIDA Y, OC'fOBElR 6 - 1 p.m.
This would be promoted through the program and press releases.
MlElIli][A. lIliAY
SIX WEEKS OUT
Invitation to print media and Deejays to "warm up for the races." We will also invite
clubs and organizations to "practice play" in the Mud Volleyball championships.
'fElLEVIlSllON rlRlEVIllEW - MlElIli][A. DAYS
MONlIJiA Y -lFllUIDA Y
Invite broadcast media, including ESPN extreme sports to attend a media preview-
of the races. Invite guests to come out at race, play mud volleyball, run the mud bog,
find the coins in the sand pile. For Gayle Anderson, we should get the shower head
tractor.
MUlIJi VOlLlLEYJ8AlLlL COMJ!>EnnON - rllUZlE MUNlEY
Offer $500cash prize to the winning 4 man and winning 6 man team for the weekend.
A single elimination series will begin on Saturday at 10 a.m. All clubs and
organizations will be sent letters inviting them to enter the competition to raise
money for their club.
~~~O<<:~~~
21705 Como Strefi 0 Wi!domoIr 0 Col*omia 92595
(909) 676-7875(9091 0 678-1456 0 fcm (9091 678-5%7
JPUBUC :RIE;JLA '[]ONS
MAJRKIE,[][NG AND JPIIWMO'[][ONS
,[][ME UNE
MAY
Calendar Notices for Tractor Race to Magazines and Travel Writers
Begin sponsorship proposals
ruNE
Public ]Relations
Announce Chairman
Announce Vendor Availability
Announce Volleyball Applications
Announce Sponsors
Sign up with Race Against Drugs Program
Write Letters to Kathy Ireland, Jay Leno on Race Against Drugs
Marketinl! and Promotions
Obtain Media Sponsors
Begin Poster Design
Develop Flyers for SponsorslVendors
Develop Applications for Volleyball
Pursue First Right of Refusal Sponsors
Pursue venue sponsors
Develop small category sponsors (bleacher and fence banners)
Pursue K-Mart/Tide for Race Against Drug Partnership
JUJL'\{
Public ]Relations
Announce Entertainment Locally
Announce major sponsors
Announce major changes of event
Search for volunteers
Promote volleyball, mud surfing tractor applications
Mail letters to club presidents on "volleyball" tournaments/prize package
Get approval with School District to participate in Race Against Drug program
through schools
~~~~fg)~o~~~~
a1705 Como Street 0 Wildomar 0 Coll1omia n595
(909) 676-7875(909) 0 678-1456 0 l'Oll(909) 678-5%7
Marketing and Promotions
Print Tickets
Order ETM Tickets
Produce B-roll for television
Mail Radio Ticket Giveaway Packets
Pursue Sponsors
AIJGUS]'
Public lRelations
Announce Tickets on Sale
Distribute posters, flyers
Write program articles
Finish sponsorship sales
Begin "Radio" updates on tractor prep
Begin "Radio" updates on volleyball
Promote applications available
Mail invitations to Media Day
Send PSAs for radio, television
Announce sponsors
Media Day, August 26th
Send invitations to television newscasters
Send invitations/challenges to Deejays-
Begin Clipping Service
Marketing and Promotions
Distribute flyers
Distribute posters
Mail B-rolls
Finish sponsorship sales
Prepare for media day
Write radio commercials
Begin reader ads in Pennysaver/Bargain Bulletin
AA~~ 1A1JJ~~ ~OO$ ~1lil1l~
21705 Como Smm 0 Wi!domar 0 CalWomla 92595
(909) 676-7875 (909) 0 678-WS6 0 l'all (909)678-5%7
SEPTEMBER
Public JRelations
Media Follow Up
Release articles on kid's faire
Release articles on "unique teams" (racers, volleyball, etc.)
Release "tickets" on sale
Announce additional sponsors
Announce parade through old town
Announce Race Against Drug participation
Announce prizes available for Volleyball
Volleyball "test run" competition weekend pr
Marketinl! and Promotions
Begin Ads in The Californian
Begin Ads in the Press-Enterprise
Begin Ads in The Bargain Bulletin
Begin Commercials!Radio
In-store displays with grocery store/Pep Boys
Distribute posters through promotional partners
Distribute Race Against DruglRace Night Out with School Districts
Distribute Race Against Drug literature through health clubs
Distribute flyers, table tents at hotels
Distribute flyers for entertainment at clubs, Pechanga
Shelf Talkers/Neck riders distribute through partners
OC'fOBEJR2-8
OC'fOBEJR6
MOJRN][NGS
Television media races/morning
AA~~~~~De~~~
21705 Como S~ 0 W'l!domor 0 California 92595
(909) 676-7875 (909) 0 678-WS6 0 I'alt (909) 678-$%7
IV. THE GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE
ATTACHMENT D - 2000 TRACTOR RACE BUDGET
0b/29/2020 23:17
909-b94-921b
TTA
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
PROPOSED 2000 BUDGET
DEI'f 3 (TRACTOR RACE)
INCOME'
Admissions
Jleer/Bar
Casino Nighl
Entries
Evenl Parking
RV Parlting
Sponsors
Vendors
Tor AL INCOME
EXPENSES,
Advertising & PR
Awards
BeerlBar
Casino Night
Contingencies
Donations-SeIVice-COnt.
Eleclric Power-Uti\.
Entenainmenl
Equipmenl Rental
IllSUl'lIIICC-GeneraJ
Licenses & PenniIS
Media Day
Sanitation
Security
Signs
Site: Prep
Trash/Clean Up
VIP Tent
Work Panies
JOT AL EXPENSES
NET INCOME-PROFlT/(LOSS)
PAGE 02
50,000.00
25.000.00
2,500.00
6.000.0tl
3.000.00
1.000.00
25.000.00
10.000.00
122.500.00
7,500.00
1.800.00
7.500.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
2.000.00
15,000.00
.w.OOO.OO
7,500.00
2.400,00
500.00
300.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
I 500.00
2.ooo.110
3,000.00
500.00
- 2!ll!J!Q
101,700.00
20.800.00
IV. THE GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE
ATTACHMENT E -1999 TRACTOR RACE MEDIA/PROMOTIONS RECAP
~@/QI@\\!\~~ ~@'l9} ~~~@@ll~~ll@~
January 4. 2000
n;(Nr
~fECClEgVfED
JAN 0 4 2000
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, Ca 92590
Altn: Jim O'Grady
Assistanl City Manager
Summary of Tractor Race 1999
The Traclor Race was held on October 1,2, & 3. This year Ihe wealher cooperated and we had no
blizzards. We had 95 traclors enlered as well as 28 mud volleyball teams. The track had been improved by
the S.D.F. T.A. and CJ Racing during Ihe year and Ihe !raclor drivers loved it. Alllhe races wenl well with
no injuries. Allhough the bleachers were full mosl ofthe weekend the overall altendance was down
slightly. We had approximalely 18,000 for the weekend and 250 at Fridays Casino Nite.
All in all il was a well received even! and I believe Ihe Temecula Police Department will confirm thai law
enforcement problems were kept 10 a minimum.
Sincerely,
ohn Sterling
General Manager
Temecula Town Association
P.O. Box 435
Temecula, CA 92593
(909) 676-4718
Fax (909) 694-9216
Ternecula Community Center
28816 Pujol Street
Ternecula, CA 92590
~(ID(ID(ID ~relIDfr liBlll171liBlC:lllIl1al T~<<::~\O)1i' ~~.
ards
Ytlll@Jvision Cov~rnl2l~ (l)1'~veUi~ ellil~ ~0 Cot!! Of'ii'iDMiDCul!1'S
)> 4 Major Los Angeles Network Stations, including ABC- s - .
NBC- morning news, FOX - KTTV. AND KCAL
)> Nationwide ElllpOSUre on KTTV M "". g News with Steve
}> Cable coverage on:Media......,....: . 13
)> Cable covet" .'-i'ilVleif- ....-:~"
)> TCI commJ_~;,.'1: [:~...- ......,
.~::,~~,;:; ,...~t:~:... ...,,:.:,:'; ':~> \ ,~.~,:'.,:...;;:' ,:.~.:. }, ~ I\.Y
.. _.._... ,..' "I., .,,0 r.:~j, .....'''''.1'..;. ...,....'.'''''~ " , II '".. ; .." -,.. I ""1/1
R2Cl1DOCO"~1 :." ..;...'... I: , " . ''''ft'' ~..._,'I...!,,'IIII~n. 'z. \I'
o .. - r,;;"" ::.":.:'''~:', ::~.:; ;.~ '::""~"'. '.
IlJJaJO~ $t[ llGil~ ,,' . , ." .' " _. . .' ,:." ,".
. "~. . I ..,/- " . S I .... . .. . .
\'. ''''I G/,'FR' ......" ..., ,'" ':" '. . " "~".,
r ~ .\ . "... ,.,;",,;:. '.. -;'. "~,,,,.
"'" KVi/flP- He!- '.. ::' I.,',;' . ,:.,... ,. :. .'" ., '"
r I' " " ". ,'. "1'1' _"...
. '. . ..' . p.
>> KAT'"" 10".~ ,,:f.,;";' ".,';'" ."..., ....:,:..' ~'~~~.'
.. . ~, ...~. ' . I ....
)> PO;III!:. K 1 c'~' :.:, " . " ·
'. ... . J"'. h .,,~.
)}- KDLti 1(;.4 ~ '.,' " I' . . ".::" "+ ~ ".:~.~'.
E. 'S TAl ,. .. : .. ~ '... .j" ~:......" .,..
)> N III. "'" '~'. "." ," ',j'. .
Pub'lc." ,.,,, ;".' . . . :.'";;,, ::;. ,: :.)L"" S i)2'
a III. I' ''&''''" '....~..:u.l~. =,..~;,...:....~!"~"...:....,.-;.....".."::O:
1l11lliioi1lml ~I. ,lie! u:':. .~. . .:.,,! . :', ,. ~' . . . J I; ,.. '."'. . \ (f'1\\, t. . ,',,/
'" ...,'" . . .,'....., I, .I',~: .,..'.:. ""d~ .. ~.~
, '.. ,', -:..... .. :): .. ,',' : ., ."!." ..' ,r:-,.-~ ' ="~.:
. . . .....,.. . III" ,.. I, "I' .. .. ~ -:. .. :": :'." ..
1.'I).~hf,'~ '1,';(., 1'~,.a~I~::.:"
... "''' M<>61" " " . , , , ,
~\U~ Nw~ ",II.. ..... i .:;="_n.
}l> RV Journal
}> SSln Disgo Magezine
}l> SSIn Diego Family Magazine
)> San Diego Union Tribune
}> San Gabriel VSllIsy Business Journal
}l> San Bemardino Sun
}l> San Diego Daily Californian
}l> North County rimes
}l> Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
}> Dssert Sun
}l> Los Angeles Times
}> Sun City Naws
}> Vin0YSlrd Press
}l> Inland Entertainment Round Up
}l> Sun Tribune
)> Rancho News
}> Inland Empire Maga"inI!I
}l> La Jolla Light
Produced by Malady'. Ad Wol1lo
1999
sze"d
L91:oS BL9 606
S~~OM.cr~-S^aO'3W Wd ~~:~B Bee~-lZ-Nnr
$10,000
$2500
$2500
$2500
$5000
$ J 2.000 "'~i
J4.s00~"iti'!
~~:.t~ . ..
;:""":~.~..: :~..'~ H~::r;";~'''t,~1:t;:
: .i' ,,' '-:,.'.. ..
"00''''1'"'''' "l ",. ..' ,.. ". . "'. ',,!.. ..
~ UU VI~j"ll . ....1" . I,.,.. ,., ',. "'".. . ..
^ 38000P 'r':'~: .".. .....'."...:f...'. ,','''. ~ '.1',:",,',. ..
v , rcgra.,..,.,...:.I.z,V"IrI.:,.r~r.' .5.... ...'1100""", ,~. ',,*,~,
o 1 000 Posters tli~lli;"L,!~':.1r.~ ., "" ':' ..." '~"..' '" ...,; ciiJpl..ued in
'. d h~" ,', "..'...'". .....," -:. .~. .
win O\'".'S . .'" " .. ." ~. ," 'q'~i" .:
o 15 ooe I "t!I~" ~:.:~:,..,,:\~;;..y,,' I :-il;sihOia/l'}ic,;:evll,,,,'.:. '~:')"'.,.:'!in"r:1 to
. .I...., .".. . .,'"
FHllhr()ok/Bon~' .~~"LI.~~',."..~.,~ 'r',... : ~, ", ~ :~..., " " . ..
.. ..~ .:. " " . . .: ~~, ,.' :.."..
o Wr.-h!lilr.- - Terr. ' ." ;. '; '.1.1' .!;i:i....."I:!"'roP, 1'/", .,t'.,;~, lor 30 days
. ", .., ,. ',,' 0, !-or"... 0 t b
regard rg l"H<:' . y ,~I~.I ' . ..,'. .'..'1 . I~"".~!,I:: coer
r " ~. . ~ "Co
5) : ,,", ,,.. "'",
o B-roll footage ~{;$~l: i:.J&.:"",~~:" .""::'
KFMB KCBS '~""..:~... "; '~"il: ,." ~,~
, '.~',~o"~~'~~~.' 'O'i:'.:" '::",5_
o Media Day-w' '!~i:~ "".i}, "s., :.:,
city council
Ag\fER11'151[;\'JG "A!.UE/IN-~IND
PRESS ENTERPRISE .
CALIFORNIAN
KATY
KXFG
BARGAIN BULLETIN
RADlOrnCKET GIVEA WAY
TOTAL MEDIA
C, KNSD.
vitations to
, .,'. .i ",. . ,. ".s-. 0'" . :' .", ,,~.."\ . =~:,.;::
, oil. .,...!~; . I "',,: ,:. -. !.,.: ,If' .' ,.....'5:.: R : ~'
.": : . .... :.-.I~.. ::l'~ "~.:"'..i.. .
toe-d
L9to~ 8L9 606
Produced by Melady's Ad Worlw
1999
S~~OM-a~-S^aOI3W Wd toto:~0 000Z-1Z-Nnr
o PERRIS PROGRESS, Perris
o SUN CllY NEWS x
o SUN TRlBUNE.Lake Elsinore x
o SAN DIEGO UNION TRiBUNE.
o LAJOLLA LIGHT. San Diego Cty
OAT EASE. San Diego County
o INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE,
o WESTWAYS x
o nID SCOUT. o.,eanside
o REDLANDS DAILY FACTS.
o THE V ALLEY TIMES. Moreno Valley
o NORTH COUNlY TIMES. FaUbrk.,Bonsl..Ocea.
o SAN BERNARDINO SUN x
o LOS ANGELES TIMES, Solllh Bay x
o LOS ANGELES TIMES. Southeast x
o NORTH ClY TIMES.Escondido
o CORONA INDEPENDENT x
o ANZA V ALLEY OUTLOOK. II
o FRIDAY FLYER, Canyon Lake x
o ROD RUN CALENDA in Press-Enterprise
o BARGAIN BULLETIN,Sun City.x,
o BARGAIN BULLETIN, MurrietalWildomarx
o BARGAIN BULLETIN, Temecul.
o HEMET NEWS x
o DESERT SUN x
o OLD CALIFORNIA GAZETIE..x........................
o CIIAMBER NEWS...x..........................................
o SHOWS &. EVENTS.x.....................,.....................
.
o
... 3,084
,..,4.170
.. 10,691
467.287
.... 9,336
.. 30,000
.. 16,000
460,428
.. 30,000
....9.614
.. 10,000
.. 37,204
100,220
, I .
.. 23,364
.... 7.269
....1,500
.... 4,7do
. 14.198
.. 55,000
IV. THE GREAT TEMECULA TRACTOR RACE
ATTACHMENT F - SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
ADVERTISING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF TEMECULA AND
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
This Agreement, made this lIth day of July. 2000, by and between the CITY OF
TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION, a
California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as ("TT An).
A. TTA will operate the "Great Temecula Tractor Race" on October 6,7 and 8, 2000.
The Great Temecula Tractor Race is a special event located at the Northwest Sports Complex at
Winchester Road and Diaz, featuring Tractor Races, Chili Cook-Off, Carnival, and all day
entertainment. The event draws approximately 20,000 people for the 3-day event.
B. The City of Temecula desires to be a "Special Event Sponsor" of the 2000 Great
Temecula Tractor Race.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
A. In exchange for providing for the Great Temecula Tractor Race of approximately
$14,000 for all city-support costs of Public Works, Fire and Police, the City of Temecula shall be
designated as a "Special Event Sponsor" of the 2000 Great Temecula Tractor Race. In the event
that City support services exceeds $14,000, the sponsor may seek City authorization for payment
above that amount. In exchange for being a "Special Event Sponsor," the City of Temecula will
receive the benefits as listed in Attachment A.
B. Within 60 days following the Great Temecula Tractor Race, TTA shall prepare
and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Great Temecula Tractor
Race, its attendance, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a "Special
Event Sponsor." The report should also include samples of media press clippings, flyers,
pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook format.
C. The TTA shall file a Temporary Use Permit application and a Special Event
Permit application, if required for street closures, with the City of Temecula no later than 45 -
60 days preceding the first day ofthe Great Temecula Tractor Race.
D. Once the Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications have been
submitted and the event agreement has been executed in final form, the TT A will receive
sponsorship payment.
E. TT A agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected
officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to
persons or property by reason of TT A's acts or omissions or those of TT A's employees, officers,
agents, or invites in connection with the Great Temecula Tractor Race to the maximum extent
allowed by law.
F. TTA shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing
insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the
duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in
which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with TTA and shall furnish
a Certificate of Liability by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or
any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall;
1. Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering
all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Great Temecula Tractor Race.
2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the
scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with
Great Temecula Tractor Race.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
(A) General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(B) Liquor Liability: $2,000,000 combines single limit per occurrence
for bodily injury personal injury and property damage.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Great Temecula
Tractor Race.
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided
that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason
whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand.
6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved
by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible
or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or TTA shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration
and defense expenses.
G. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement,
the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to
any other relief to which it may be entitled.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
DATED:
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
John Sterling, General Manager
JeflTey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
~TEM 1
I1IIINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MAY 9,2000
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:55
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone,
and Chairman Roberts.
ABSENT:
o
AGENCY MEMBER:
None.
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 2000.
2 Old Town Streetscape Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve an appropriation of $114,300.00 from Redevelopment Tax Increment
Fund Balance to fund a settlement agreement.
Agency Member Stone advised that he would be abstaining from this item.
For clarification, Chairman Roberts noted that the actual appropriation amount for consent Calendar
Item NO.2 was $114,300.00 (as reflected in this record).
MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1, and
2. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Agency Member Stone who abstained with regard to Item NO.2.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
R:\Minutesl050900
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:56 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to next
adjourned regular meeting: May 23, 2000, scheduled to follow the Community Services District
Meeting, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Ron Roberts, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Minulesl050900
2
TEMECUlA COMMUN~TY
SERV~CES D~STR~CT
~TEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
I1IlA Y 9, 2000
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
9:36 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
5
DIRECTORS:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, and
President Comerchero.
ABSENT:
o
DIRECTORS:
None.
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 2000.
2 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charaes for FY 2000-01
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2000-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH
RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
3 Authorization to solicit Construction Bids for the Rancho California Sports Park Parkina
Lot Rehabilitation Proiect - Proiect No. PWOO-05
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Public Works
Department to solicit Construction Bids for the Rancho California Sports Park
Parking Lot Rehabilitation Project - Project No. PWOO-05.
R:IMinutesl050900
1
4 Award of Construction Contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Tot Lot ADA
Uparade - Proiect No. PWOO-04CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Award a contract for the Rancho California Sports Park Tot Lot ADA Upgrade-
Project No. PWOO-04CSD - to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, Inc. for
92,187.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract;
4.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $9,218.70, which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
City Attorney Thorson advised that the fact the Director Naggar's residence was located across
the street from the Rancho California Sports Park would not preclude him from taking action on
Consent Calendar Item No.4, regarding the proposed project to resurface the parking lot at the
sports park.
MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-4. The motion was
seconded by Director Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
5 Temecula Hiah Hopes Proaram Presentation
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file the report and video presentation on the Temecula High Hopes
Program.
Director of Community Services Parker relayed that in September of 1999 the Temecula
Community Services Department implemented the Temecula High Hopes Program designed to
meet the special needs of community members; and noted that Recreation Superintendent
Pelletier and Recreation Supervisor Adkisson would provide a brief overview, and a video
presentation of the program.
Recreation Superintendent Pelletier relayed that Recreation Supervisor Adkisson oversaw the
High Hopes Program; advised that the program was design for adults 18 years of age and older
with special needs in order for these individuals to have the chance to meet, and socialize on a
regular basis; and noted that there were 91 High Hopes participants who met at the Mary Phillips
Center on the 1 st and 3rd Fridays of each month.
Recreation Supervisor Adkisson noted that the video would provide an overview of the program,
relaying the staff and the volunteers that support the program, the parents who appreciate the
efforts of the City with respect to the development of the program, and the participants who value
this opportunity; and presented the video presentation which provided data regarding the
program's origination which was initiated by the request of a local resident, Ms. Karen Newman,
noting Councilman Lindemans' interest in the development of this particular program in the City of
Temecula when the concept was initiated.
Recreation Supervisor Adkisson introduced some of the participants of the program who
presented a banner to the City of Temecula, and thanked the Council and the City for the special
High Hopes Program.
R:\Minulesl050900
2
President Comerchero thanked the High Hopes participants for the banner; and thanked Ms.
Newman for bringing the concept of the program to the City of Temecula, relaying that in all his
years at the City this was the most rewarding program that has been offered.
It was noted that no formal action was taken regarding this agenda item.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No input.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Nelson relayed that the City continued to improve the recreation programs
every year, siting the High Hopes Program as an example of the commitment the City takes for
providing a wide variety of recreational programs; and advised that he was very proud to be part
of the City of Temecula.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
For Director Naggar, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that staff would investigate
and report back with respect to the community service ideas that he had submitted to staff.
Director Stone noted that he was impressed with the High Hopes program, advising that if there
were any financial needs required for this program that Director of Community Services Parker
present the issue when the City reviewed this year's budget, noting that this program was
heartwarming.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:55 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
next adjourned regular meeting: May 23, 2000, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent
Calendar in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\MinulesI050900
3