Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout031298 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title ll] CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENTS AGENDA TE1VIECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD Thursday, March 12, 1998 5:00 PM AT FIRE STATION 84, 30650 PAUBA ROAD TO ADJOURN TO THE REGULAR MEETING AT 6:00 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a '*Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed trader Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of January 15. 1998 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of January 15, 1998 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. General Plan Circulation Element Update Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on the status of the General Plan Circulation Element Updat~ 3. Proposed Non-Standard Street Name Si~s - Various Locations RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the proposed street name signs manufactured by La Cresta Plastic Fence Company (formerly Rancho Recycled Products) and Earth Care, and make a recommendation to the City Council. 4. Removal of Barrier at the Duck Pond/Osear's DrivewSy - Ynez Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and consider a request regarding removal of the existing barrier at the Duck Pond/Oscar's driveway on Ynez Road 5. Request for htstallation of a Traffic Signal - Inteneetion of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road be placed on the City's Signal Priority List and consider installation of an "All-Way Stop" sign as an interim traffic control device. 6. Appointment of a Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner to the General Plan Circulation Element Update Committee RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission appo'mt a commission member to the General Plan Circulation Element Update Committee 7. Traffic Engineer's Report 8. Police Chief's Report 9. Fire Chief's Report 10. Commission Report ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, April 9, 1998, at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Counc'd Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ITEM NO. I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 15, 1998 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission was called to order on Thursday, January 15, 1998, 6:01 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Telesio called the meeting to order. PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None Also present were Public Works Associate Engineer All Moghadam, Police Sergeant Rodney Crisp, Battalion Chief John Winder, Fire Captain Alan Black, Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle, and Minute Clerk Pat Kelley. Commissioner Coe led the flag salute. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chairman Telesio called for public comments on non-agenda items. Susan Thornton, 30385 Copeno Lane requested consideration of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pio Pico Road and Margarita Road for the safety of the children attending Sparkman Elementary School. She is requesting a signal because 1 ) southbound Margarita Road vehicles are traveling 50 to 60 MPH at that location; and 2) a blind curve on southbound Margarita Road causes visibility problems, Ms. Thornton stated Hasib Baha, Public Works, told her beacon lights will be installed before the end of the school year. Commissioner Markham commented there are California pepper trees which obstruct the view for southbound Margarita Road traffic. He asked about the status of the traffic signal at Pauba Road and Margarita Road. Mr. Moghadam stated a signal at Santiago Road and Margarita Road is under design and the traffic signal for the intersection of Pauba and Margarita Roads will be installed by the developer of the vacant property in the future. Commissioner Johnson questioned the possibility of using the construction zone double fine provision for school zones. Mr. Moghadam will research the Vehicle Code to determine the possibility and will report back to the Commission at a later date. Sid Gitthens, 315230 Jedediah Smith Road, expressed his support of Ms. Thornton's comments and the need for a traffic signal at the intersection of Pio Pico Road and Margarita Road. PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 15, 1998 COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of December 11.1997 It was moved by Commission Markham, seconded by Commissioner Perry to approve the Minutes of December 11, 1997. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: I COMMISSIONER: Coe COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. ProDosed Street Name Signs - Various Locations Associate Engineer All Moghadam presented the staff report. Commissioner Coe stated the Commission considered and approved street signs several years ago. Commissioner Markham reported the Commissioner approved aluminum metal street name signs with the City seal on January 26, 1995; subsequently another vendor brought a reproduction of the existing wooden sign for the Commission's consideration. The recommendation was never forwarded to the City Council for action. He stated Meadowview HOA has received approval and an encroachment permit to replace and maintain their street name signs. Commissioner Markham also noted that the staff report had the HOA's paying for the signs, but the Commission's recommendation was for the City to pay for the street name signs. Sid Gitthens, 31520 Jedediah Smith Road, representing the Santiago Ranchos HOA, demonstrated a post manufactured from recyclable plastic with a rotor-mold arm scroll which is graffiti resistant, low maintenance, safer than a steel pole when hit, has a life expectancy of 25 to 40 years, has 25% reflectivity, and costs $350 to $/400, not including installation. He stated Santiago Ranchos HOA is requesting approval to put up the standard 4" X 4" post sign made from this material unless the City approves the rotor-mold arm scroll model for Citywide placement. Commissioner Coe stated he would like to see a model in the ground after dark and then compare it to the Meadowview signs. Commissioner Markham supported the new signs. It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Markham, to have this item on the March, 1998 agenda, and to ask Earthcare and Rancho Recycling give a presentation. PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 15.1998 Commissioner Johnson asked to amend the motion by adding staff to provide the Commission with the minutes of the January 26, 1995 meeting and report on what has transpired since that time regarding street name signs. Commissioners Perry and Markham agreed to the amendment. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None 3. Left-Turn Restriction - Warbler Drive at Nicolas Road Associate Engineer Ali Moghadam presented the staff report. Commissioner Markham asked if a median was installed, would a left-turn restriction be appropriate. Mr. Moghadarn replied if there is a good alternative for a U-Turn at other locations, he would recommend a left-turn restriction on Warbler Drive. Commissioner Johnson questioned whether the stop bar could be moved forward. Mr. Moghadam replied it could not due to ADA requirements for handicap access ramps. It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Markham, to not restrict left-turn movements from Warbler Drive onto Nicolas Road. Commissioner Markham inquired about the trees in the right of way. Mr. Moghadam replied Public Works Maintenance Crews have removed the lower branches of a pine tree at this location. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ReQuest for Installation of a Crosswalk - Meadows Parkway between Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road Associate Engineer Ali Moghadam presented the staff report. Commissioner Johnson inquired about the status of a brochure describing the pros and cons of crosswalks and detailing court cases and decisions which would be given to people requesting crosswalks. Mr. Moghadam stated there is a brochure that explains crosswalks and will be distributed to the Commissioners. 3 R:\traffic\commiesn\mlnutee\98~,01159B.min PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 15, 1998 It was moved by Commissioner Coe, seconded by Commissioner Perry, to deny a request for installation of a painted crosswalk, a traffic signal or "Stop" signs on Meadows Parkway between Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road near Vintage Hills Elementary School. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None "No Parking" Zones on Jefferson Avenue North of Winchester Road Associate Engineer All Moghadam presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Coe, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to recommend the City Council adopt a resolution establishing "No Parking" zones on Jefferson Avenue north of Winchester Road. The motion carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio None None Resolution Establishing Date. Time and Location of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Markham, to establish the third Thursday of each month, 6:00 p.m., in the Temecula City Council Chambers as the regular meeting date, time and location. Commissioner Coe commented he would prefer a different date. After discussion, Commissioner Johnson withdrew his motion and Commissioner Markham withdrew his second. It was moved by Commissioner Coe, seconded by Commissioner Markham, to establish the second Thursday of each month, 6:00 p.m., in the Temecula City Council Chambers as the regular meeting date, time and location. PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 15.1998 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Johnson, Markham, Perry, Telesio NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Mr. Moghadam reported the following: The signals at Margarita Road and Yukon Road/Honors Drive will be in operation by the end of January, 1998. The interconnection and timing of City traffic signals will be in operation by February, 1998 and the Commissioners will be given a presentation after staff is trained to operate the system. The City Council directed staff to look into alternative funding sources to pave all unpaved City streets. Most of the issues raised by the Commission at their workshop will be budgeted for next fiscal year. A letter was received from the Los Ranchitos residents regarding changes in traffic flow. This issue will be presented to the Commission in the near future. Commissioner Johnson stated a problem remains with the northbound left-turn signal at Margarita Road and Winchester Road. Mr. Moghadam replied Caltrans had been notified. Commissioner Johnson asked staff to express to Caltrans the Commission's concern with the signal's timing phase. POLICE CHIEFS REPORT Commissioner Markham stated enforcement has been very evident in the last couple of weeks. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT Chief Winder introduced Captain Alan Black, who will be representing the Fire Department at future Commission meetings. American Medical Response (AMR), the company providing ambulance service to the City, has put a second unit at Fire Station 84 from 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM, seven (7) days a week and the Fire Department will be evaluating their response time. He stated a fire engine responds to all medical aids in less than five (5) minutes and paramedics, just under ten (10) minutes, which is acceptable under County standards. 5 R;\tra~fflc\commissn\minutes\98\011698.rnin PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 15. 1998 Commissioner Coe commended Chief Winder for his presentation on KCBS. Chief Winder suggested a tour of Fire Station 84 for the Commission on Thursday, February 12, 1998, 5:00 PM and all agreed to meet at the Station prior to the Commission meeting. COMMISSION REPORT Commissioner Coe asked if the Fire and Police Departments intend to have another Public Safety Fair. Chief Winder stated he was in favor of having a Public Safety Fair and the Fire Department will coordinate with the Police Department for a date for a Public Safety Fair. Commissioner Johnson asked Chief Winder to report back to the Commission at the March, 1998 meeting. Commissioner Markham stated he discussed the representation of the interview panel to select a firm to update the Circulation Element of the Temecula General Plan with Gary Thornhill, Director of Community Development. Chairman Telesio thanked Commissioner Markham for doing a terrific job as chairman for 1997. It was moved by Commissioner Coe, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to adjourn the meeting at 7:40 PM. The motion carried unanimously. The next regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, February 12, 1998, at 5:00 P.M. at Fire Station 84, 30650 Pauba Road, and adjourn to 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman John H. Telesio Secretary 6 R:\traffic\commis~n\minutes\98\011598,min ITEM NO. 2 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam P.E., Associate Engineer March 12, 1998 Item 2 General Plan Circulation Element Update Report RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on the status of the General Plan Circulation Element Update. BACKGROUND: The City is currently in the process of updating the Circulation Element of the General Plan. This update is being administered by the City of Temecnia Planning Department. Mr. Matthew Fagan, AICP, Associate Planner will present a brief report on the Circulation Element update status. FISCAL IMPACT: None ITEM NO. 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Associate Engineer March 12, 1998 Item 3 Proposed Non-Standard Street Name Signs - Various Locations RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the street name signs manufactured by La Cresta Plastic Fence Company (formerly Rancho Recycled Products) and Earth Care, and make a recommendation to the City Council. BACKGROUND: At the January 15, 1998 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission reviewed a special street name sign manufactured by Earth Care and directed staff to bring back this item in 60 days. The Commission also requested that the original design which was presented to the Commission on January 26, 1995, be reconsidered and the manufacturer be invited to the meeting. The minutes of January 26, 1995 meeting (Exhibit "A) Lnxticate that the Commission specified a certain design and recommended that the special residential street name signs be replaced when needed at the City's expense Staff has invited the two (2) manufacturers of these special signs to make a presentation to the Commission for review and input. Upon approval by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, this item will be presented to the City Council for approval and appropriation of funds. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" - Minutes of Jannary 26, 1995 Public/Traffic Safety Commission 2. Exhibit "B" - Sign Specifications by La Cresta Plastic Pence Company EXHIBIT "A' MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 26, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission was called to order on Thursday, January 26, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Knox Johnson called the meeting to order: PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Sander, Guerriero, Perry ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Coe Also present were Traffic Engineer Marty Lauber, Traffic Technician Hasib Baha, Officer Mark Leggett, Battalion Chief Mark Brodowski, Administrative Secretary, Pubic Works Department, Anita Pyle. Chairman Johnson reported receiving a telephone call from a resident interested in Item 7. This person requested the item be placed on the next meeting agenda because they were not able to attend tonight. The Commissioners will discuss this request when the item is scheduled. Commissioner Coe arrived at 7:10 P.M. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of October 27.1994 and December 8.1994 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approval of the Minutes of October 27, 1994, continued from the meeting of December 8, 1994. 1.2 Approval of the Minutes of December 8, 1994 2. Dual Turn Lanes-Diaz Road at Winchester Road That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the re-striping plan for the intersection of Diaz Road and Winchester Road as shown on Exhibit "A". It was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to approve Consent Calendar Items 1.1 the minutes of October 27, 1994 and 1.2 the minutes of December 8, 1994, and 2.1 re-striping plans for Diaz Road and Winchester Road as in Exhibit "A". The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON, SANDER, PERRY, GUERRIERO, COE NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE traf/min/jan26 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 26, 1995 COMMISSION BUSINESS 3. SI;)ecial Street Name Signs - To Replace Existing Wooden Signs Traffic Engineer Lauber presented the staff report and informed the Commission of the residents' objection to replacing the existing wooden signs with the typical green/white metal variety. Traffic Engineer Lauber shared slides depicting the existing signs and proposed City signs. A single blade sign is recommended. John Hoagland, 40481 Calle Fiesta, Temecula, spoke on behalf of the Meadowview Community Association. The Association recently replaced the signs at a cost of $10,000 under an Agreement with the City of Temecula. The signs are expected to last for 25 years. Meadowview wishes to maintain the wooden signs in order to keep the aesthetics of the area. Lorrie Robinson, 43615 Saufeman Place, Temecula, spoke on behalf of the Santiago Ranchos Board of Directors. They would like their signs replaced and are in support of the design being recommended but with black letters/white background, and to maintain the country look, with a horse depicted on the sign. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Temecula, spoke on behalf of the Los Ranchitos Home Owners Association, in support of the design but would prefer a whole horse as the logo. He stated that the cost of the signs should be the City's responsibility and he believes that each area should adopt a standard sign so as to become unique within their area. It was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner Guerriero, to recommend to the City Council a standard sign be adopted for the City. That sign being Brown/White or Gold/Brown with a standing horse, City Seal, block number and arrow. Lettering to be upper and lower case. Installed throughout the City including residential areas as need for replacement occurs and the costs to be paid by the City. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON, SANDER, PERRY, GUERRIERO, COE NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE Bequest to Allow the Existing Wooden Street Name Signs - Meadowview Community Association Traffic Engineer Lauber reported that staff had received correspondence from residents in support of keeping the wooden signs maintaining them through an Agreement with the City of Temecula. John Hoagland, 40481 Calle Fiesta, Temecula, supported maintaining the wooden signs in the Meadowview area. The Meadowview Community Association would like to enter into an Agreement with the City to be permitted to replace the signs as necessary, keeping the wooden signs at the Association's expense. traf/min/jan26 2 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 26. 1995 It was moved by Commissioner Perry and seconded by Commissioner Coe, to recommend to the City Council to enter into an Agreement with Meadowview Community Association to keep the wooden signs and the Association is to be responsible for the maintenance and replacement of those signs. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: SANDER, PERRY, GUERRIERO, COE 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE I COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, due to a conflict of interest. "Don't Drink and Drive" Signs Traffic Engineer Lauber reported the Traffic Division was contacted by the Temecula Partnership Community Committee to enter into an agreement to incorporate "Don't Drink and Drive" slogans on signs in the City. Staff is unsure of any locations available at this time, however, is interested in investigating this with other areas. The City would like to support this effort and the Community Committee has raised the funds to pay for the signs. * Commissioner Johnson believes it should be considered, however, is concerned with too many signs in Temecula. * Commissioner Sander requested stars on drunk driving violations in the area. * Commissioner Guerriero felt the slogan should be toned down and not be as blunt due to the large business community in Temecula. * Commissioner Perry was in agreement with Commissioner Guerriero, and felt protective of the businesses in Temecula that serve wine. Jay Hoffman, Assistant Superintendent, Temecula Unified School District and Co-Chair of the Temecula Community Partnership, explained this was part of a one million dollar federal grant received by the Temecula Unified School District and this was coordinated with alcohol vendor training. It was moved by Commissioner Guerriero and seconded by Commissioner Coe to support the Temecula Community Partnership signs with modification of the slogan "Don't Drink and Drive". The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: SANDER, PERRY, GUERRIERO, COE, JOHNSON NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE traf/min/jan26 3 EXHIBIT "B' STREET SIGNS MADE FROM RECYCLED MATERIAL (MILK JUGS) GRAFFITI PROOF ,,/l 4" PVC CAPS OAK TREE LANE 2"X6"X6' SIGNS W/ ROUTED LETTERS 5/16" ZINC PLATED BOLTS _j---~ 4"X4"X10' POSTS 24" IN GROUND W/CEMENT ITEM NO. 4 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam P.E., Associate Engineer March 12, 1998 ~') Item 4 Request for Removal of Barrier at the Duck Pond/Oscar's Driveway - Ynez Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and consider a request regarding removal of the existing barrier at the Duck Pond/Oscar's driveway on Ynez Road. BACKGROUND: The City has received a request from Oscar's restaurant representatives to remove the existing barrier at the above referenced location. According to Oscar's representatives, the barrier removal will reduce the number of drivers cutting across three (3) lanes on Rancho California Road to make a "U' turn at the Town Center/Hope Way signal to go west. The barrier removal will also reduce on-site congestion and provide a better emergency access and circulation. We have reviewed this request and determined that although removal of the barrier has some merits, consideration should be given to potential safety issues as a result of harrier removal. Left-turns in or out of this driveway could cause traffic collisions due to relatively high vehicular speed and volume on Ynez Road. It is our understanding that this driveway was initially barricaded to eliminate traffic collisions at this location. However, if left-turn movement in or out of this driveway could be physically eliminated, right-turns in or out could be made with relative safety. It should be noted that widening of Ynez Road in front of the Duck Pond and driveway access to the Oscar's parking lot from Tierra Vista Road is currently under design, and construction should be completed within 12 to 16 months. When these improvements are completed, the existing barricaded driveway at Rancho Highland Drive will be eliminated and a Waffle signal will be installed at the new driveway location at Tierra Vista Road (Exhibit "A"). The planned signalized intersection of Tierra Vista Road and Ynez Road will then provide a full access to the Duck Pond and Oscar's parking lot. FISCAL IMPACT: None AHachment: i. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Letter of Request EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP DRIVEWAY; Centers' L d ..~ yn ie Lane Via La~ Cotia~ PROPOSED DRIVEWAy ~ '!?i~ra VBta Rde 9823 t>AC~K: HEr_..HTS B~vO., Su~ J S~D~£GO, CA 92121 January 22, lgg8 PHONE619.552.J920 FAX619.552.J930 Mary Jane McLarney Assistant City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 EXItlBIT "B' Dear Mary Jane, Thank you for arranging the meeting to bring Oscar's up to date on the plans for the park improvement and the possibilities to improve the parking situation. Your group was informative, supportive, and entertained even our wildest ideas. After meeting, our highest priority is to have the barrier at Ynez removed. The increased safety (by not having drivers cutting across the white line to make the quick U-turn to head west on Rancho California), alleviation of congestion, better access for the fire department, and a few extra parking spots should make removing the barrier a high priority for the City, as well. I'm anxious to hear from Joe Kicak when this can take place. If there is anything that we can do to expedite, consider it done. We have already initiated contact with Bill Johnson to explore the possibilities of adding parking using what is currently his property. Thank you for the contact. If we are able to make an arrangement, we will get a plan to Debbie Ubnoske. Again, thank you for you time and help. Sincerely, Steve Thomas Oscar's AST/Ik VISIT OUR WEBS4TE AT WWW.BREADSTICK.COM ITEM NO. 5 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Associate Engineer March 12, 1998 Item 5 Request for Installation of Traffic Signal - Intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road be placed on the City's Signal Priority List and consider installation of an "All-Way Stop" at lifts location as an interim traffic control device. BACKGROUND: At the Jantmry 15, 1998 regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission received a letter and a verbal request to consider installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road and directed staff to place this item on the next meeting agenda. Margarita Road is designated as a four-lane arterial roadway on the General Plan Circulation Element. Currently, Margarita Road in this vicinity is a three (3) lane roadway with left-turn pockets at Pio Pico Road. Margarita Road is improved to the ultimate width including curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side only. This intersection is controlled by "Stop" signs on Pio Pico Road and the traffic on Margarita Road is not required to stop. There are school crosswalks on Margarita Road south of Pio Pico Road, and on Pio Pico Road east of Margafita Road in front of Sparkman Elementary School. A horizontal curve exists on Margarita Road south of Pio Pico Road; however, the sight distance is adequate. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH on Margarita Road and 30 MPH on Pio Pieo Road west of Margarita Road. Also, "SCHOOL - SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH - WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT" signs have been installed on Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road in both directions near the school. Staff has conducted a comprehensive study of this intersection including vehicular and pedestrian volume counts, speed data analysis, sight distance measurements, traffic collision data analysis and warrant analysis for traffic signals, "Stop" signs and flashing yellow school signals (Exhibit "B"). The intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road meets one (1) of the eleven (11) warrants (peak hour volume) for installation of a traffic signal, therefore, this intersection will be included in the City's Signal Priority List for future consideration. There has been one (1) reported accident within the last twelve (12) month period at this intersection. However, the minimum volume portion of the warrants for installation of an "All-Way Stop" is met. Therefore, an "All-Way Stop" at this intersection could be considered as an interim traffic control dayice. In addition, the design for installation of yellow flashing beacons at schools has been completed and the lights should be in place by July, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: None A~chlnent~ 1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Letter of Request 3. Exhibit "C" - Warrant Analysis and Supporting Data N EXHIBIT "A ' LOCATION; Sparkman / EXHIBIT "B" JAM|E JEFFERS 31646 Pip Pico Road Temecula, CA 92592 (909) 695-1577 RECEIVED JAN 15 1998 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT January14, I998 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL TO: All Moghadam, Traffic Engineer CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Re: Capital Improvement Projects for Traffic Control Subject Intersections: Margarita at Pip Pico Margarita at Santiago Dear Mr. Moghadam: This letter is being written to address the City of Temecula's proposed capital improvement projects. I have been informed by other citizens of Temecula that the City will propose that a traffic control device be placed at the intersection of Margafita and Santiago, and that it has not mentioned or considered the serious traffic problem currently existing at Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School at Margarita and Pio Pico Road. I am a homeowner residing in close proximity to both the intersections of Margarita/ Santiago and Margarita/Pio Plop. Although I support the City's efforts to control Margarita's traffic problems, I believe that the City should primarily address the area which puts its pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, bystanders and, most importantly, its children at danger. That intersection is Margarita at Pip Pico. 1 am not trying to dismiss the danger present at Margarita/Santiago. It is indeed hazardous to motorists traveling Northbound uphill only to immediately confront any Santiago motorist attempting to turn on or advance across Margafita. Certainly, the speed limit on Margarita is one which does not allow a lot of reaction time in any event. The residents of Pio Pico have personally seen the disregard of motorists to adhere to the posted speed limit. I am sure that local law enforcement can also attest to a number of motorists' complete disregard for Margarita's posted speed limit. However, I believe that the City should address a more serious problem which will, in time, result in the death of a pedestrian, bicyclist, motorist, and/or bystander, including without limitation a child attending Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School, at Margarita and Pio Pico Road. January 14, 1998 Ali Moghadam, Traffic Engineer City of Temecula You are probably aware of the collective efforts between Pio Pico residents and its homeowner's association to reduce unsafe speed limits traveled by motorists at Pio Pico between Deportola and Margarita. Pio Pico residents can attest to the fact that the City's posted speed limits, Califurnia's prima facie laws relating to the reduction of speed in and around school sites, blinking lights or designated crosswalks, do not stop the motorist from traveling unsafely. It only takes one mistake on the part of a motorist to take the life of an innocent person. I urge the Traffic Commission and yourself to give utmost attention to resolving this serious traffic problem at Joan F Sparkman Elementary School. Indeed, this problem should be first and foremost on the City's capital improvement projects. I further believe that failure to recognize and resolve this problem will eventually result in tragedy to one of its own families. As you are aware, a four-way traffic sign has existed at Margarita and Pauba for quite sometime. Your efforts to place a traffic control device at Margarita and Santiago is virtually only two (2) blocks away from Margarita/Pauba. In the City's June, 1997 Temecula Taffic News, it was stated that: "Using stop signs to control speeding is effective only in the immediate vicinity of the stop sign and frequently, speeds are actually higher between intersections." If such is the case, your placement of a traffic control device at Margarita/Santiago will increase the already abused speed limits from downhill Southbound traffic on Margarita toward Pio Pieo and Sparkman Elementary. Furthermore, it will not remove the blind curve ofPio Pico motorists attempting to turn Northbound onto Margarita, crossing over Margarita to pick-up their children at Sparkman School, or returning to their Paloma Development residences. The current traffic devices which line Margarita and ks perimeters in and around Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School may have been suitable when the City's population was at best minimal. I do not have to bring to your attention that our growth has abounded. Growth indeed brings change whether we like it or not. We, as citizens, and you, as our community leaders, need to work together to bring change. Please change the current situation. It is my understanding that "Susan," our local crossing guard for children coming to and from Sparkman Elementary at the Margarita/Pio Pico intersection, will be speaking before the Traffic Commission this Thursday evening, January 15, 1998. This letter is being forwarded to you in the hope that you will deeply consider the common sense issues which I have addressed and that it will in some way add impact to the message being delivered by Susan at this meeting. Due to a very serious family illness, I will be unable to attend the meeting. However, I will be there in spirit and wish that this letter will be read before the Commission. Thank you for your time and attention in this regard. cc: Traffic Commission (via hand-delivery at January 15, 1998 meeting3 Susan EXHIBIT "C" WARRANT ANALYSIS AND SUPPORTING DATA 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 1-1991 ' Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS CALC ,/"/~f/'J DATE Z'~'~ GIST CO RTE PM CHK GATE Minor S~: ~ Critical Approach Speed ~5 mph Crftical speed 01 malor s~ree[ traffic > 40 mph .............. ~ ~ RURAL (R) $n budt up area of ~solated commundy ot < 10,000 pop. - ........ ~ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular volume 100% SATISFIED YES E:] NO ,~ 80% SATISFIED YES [] NO 3~ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) * NOTE: Heavier left turn movement from Major Street included when LT-phasing is proposed Q WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO ~ 80% SATISFIED YES E:] NO ~ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (8(:~/o SHOWN IN BRACKETS) NOTE: Heavier left turn movemen~ from Malor Streel included when LT-pbasing is proposed~ WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO .p~ REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing lbe major streel is 100 or more Ior each of any four hours or is I gO or more dunng any one YeS [] No ~ hour; and There are less than 60 gaps per hour in the malor street traf- fic stream of adequate length tor pedestrians to croSS; and Yes [] No J~ The nearest traffic signal along the maior streel ~s greater Ihan 300 feet; and Yes '~ No [] The new traffic signal will not Seriously disrupt progresswe traffic flow on the major street Yes :~ No ~ The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual 9-7 1-1991 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANTS 4 - School Crossings Not Applicable .................................. [] See School Crossings Warrant Sheet/~ WARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement SATISFIED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM YES Ig NO [] FULFILLED YES,,~NO [] WARRANT 6 - Accident Experience REQUIREMENTS ONE WARRANT SATIFIED WARRANT SATISFIED WARRANT I * MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME r 80°/b WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUPT RROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEFTIBLE OF CORN & INVOLVING INJURY OR $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 5 OR MORE ~, · YES 0 NO ,~ FULFILLED YES r"] NO]i~ I n X WARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENTS ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR ~2~' VEHIHR V/ :> 800 VEH/HR OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS OF A SAT AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR S'E MINOR ST. HWY SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC / RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, DR TRAVERSING A CITY V/' -"' APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICAL PLAN ' ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTIC MET, BOTH STS SATISFIED YES rl NO 2~ FULFILLED YES ,~ NO rl YES ~ NO:~ The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown, 9-8 1-1991 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS Traffic Manual WARRANT 8 - Combination of Warrants SATISFIED YES [] NO ,~ REQUIREMENT TWO WARRANTS SATISFIED 80% WARRANT ,,/ FULFILLED 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC YES [] NO ::~ WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume SATISFIED* YES [] NO One %% - - our * Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. Approach Lanes Both Approaches Major Street Highest Approaches - Minor Street WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) SATISFIED YES [] NO ,~ 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach and five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; AND YES 2. The volume on the Same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AN0 YES [] NO]~ The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. YES ~ NO [] WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume Approach Lanes Both Approaches Major Street; Highest Approaches - Minor Street One SATISFIED more NO [] Hour Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9-4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS 9-9 (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note 2) URBAN ............................. RURAL ............................. 1 Minimum Vehicular Minimum Requirements EADT Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles per day on maior street (total of bo(h ap0roaches) Number of (anes for moving traffic on each approach Malor Street Minor Street Urban Rural 1 .......................................1 ...................................... 8,000 5,600 2 or more ........................... 1 ......................................... 9,600 6,720 2 or more ........................... 2 or more ........................... 9,600 6,720 1 .........................................2 or more .......................... 8,000 5,600 Vehmles per day on higher- volume minor-street approach (one direction only) Urban F~ural 2,400 1,680 2,400 1,680 3,200 2,240 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied Not Satisfied Numbers of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Vehicles per day on malor Street (total of both approaches) Vehictes per day on higher- votume minor-street approach (one direction only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural 12,000 8,400 14,400 10,080 14,400 10,080 12,000 8,400 Urban Rural 1,200 850 1,200 850 1,600 1,120 1,600 1,120 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fufilfed 80% or more 2 2 Warrants 2 Warrants NOTE: 1. Heavier left turn movement from the major street may be included with minor street volume if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the left-turn movement. 2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. 9-10 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9-5 SCHOOL PROTECTION WARRANTS Traffic Manual CALC DIST CO RTE PM CHK Maior St:/t,/.4~r,A/a/T'A Minor St:p/r> p/r_~ Critical speed of maior street Iraffic > 40 mpn ............. In built up area of isolated community of < I0,000 pop. - ........ [] DATE DATE CriticalApproach Speed CriticalApproach Speed .,~ mpn RURAL(R) URBAN(U) FLASHING YELLOW SCHOOL SIGNALS (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) SATISFIED YES [] No ~ Minimum Requirements PART A [ ~acnot 200 140' Vehic!e Volume 2 hours i SchoO~ Age Pedestrian ~ach of 0 0 Crossing Street 2 hours AND PART B Critical ApproaCh Speed Exceeds 35 mph AND PART C Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away? SATISFIED SATISFIED YES [] No ~ YES [] NO [] SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATiSFiED) PART A Vehicle Volume Scnool Age Pedestrian Crossing Street AND PART B is nearest controrled crossing more than 600 feet away? SATISFIED SATISFIED SATISFIED YES [] NO YES [] No,lZ, YES X No [] 9-12 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9-7 FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) Traffic Manual 400 -r 300 t.~,~ LU0 i_~" O, I~ ~ 200 0 -r 100 -,r, 0 200 ~, ,,)¢,,_.~2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) ""' - OR E~LMkNES (MAJOR) & I LANE (MINOR) -~, OR 1 AJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) I LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH NOTE: 80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 60 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 9'14 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Figure 9-9 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) Traffic Manual t I 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) -T, c3 - OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) cc rr- 300 h,n O ~ 200 Z'~ ~-i C) _ ~oo 0 30O I LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) --~ 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200. 1:300 MAJOR STREET ~ TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH NOTE: 100 VPR APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE, APPROACltI~G TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR THE INTERSECTION OF: Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road Hours Westbound Eastbound Northbound Southbound 6:00 A.M. 205 5 77 99 7:00 A.M. * 251 18 227 269 8:00 A.M. * 253 13 366 263 9:00A.M. * 110 10 226 183 10:00 A.M. 74 7 219 166 11:00 A.M. 101 7 135 187 12:00 Noon 87 l0 165 226 1:00 P.M. 77 9 158 223 2:00 P.M. * 150 17 207 362 3:00P.M. * 138 22 229 334 4:00 P.M. * 108 36 196 295 5:00P.M. * 73 38 249 312 6:00 P.M. * 102 19 209 239 Average Average highest 8 hours170 Highest 8 hours from minor All approaches: streets: * Highest eight (8) hour count. Total 386 765 895 529 466 430 488 467 736 723 635 672 569 690 r:\bahaXm~rao~stopw3.frm IOOX 70X C(31,1BINATION START NB SB EB lIB HOUR i4ARRANT MARRANT MARRANT TINE TOT NET NET NET 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 /*:00 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 29 61 1 171 262 6:00 77 99 5 205 386 7:00 227 269 18 251 765 8:00 366 263 13 253 895 9:00 226 183 10 110 529 10:00 219 166 r 74 11:00 135 187 7 101 /*:~0 12:00 165 226 10 87 13:00 158 223 9 77 467 1/*:00 207 :]62 17 150 ?"~6 * 15:00 229 x~, 22 1~8 723 * 16:00 196 295 36 108 635 * 17:00 2/*9 312 38 73 6~2 * 18:00 209 239 19 102 369 * 19:00 91 162 12 52 317 20:00 U~. 1/,1 18 51 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 2~:00 0 0 0 0 0 ir~o~inQ traffic 02/04/~ ~RRANT 1 - Accident Exl)ertence NOT SATISFIED - The accident Warrant of S or mere reportable accidents of a cottactile tlq~e is not met with t accidents over a 12 month period. WARRANT 2 - Minimum Traffic Volumes SATISFIED - The 100% vehicular Warrant of 500 entering vehicles for any 8 hours of the day is met ,ith 8 hours meeting the ,arrant. SATISFIED - The 70% vehicular warrant of 350 entering vehicles for any 8 hours of the day is met ,ith 13 hours meeting the ,arrant. WARRANT 3 - VehicuLar i Pedestrian Traffic frc~a Minor Road NOT SATISFIED - The ccx~ined total of 200 vehicles and pedestrians from the minor approach is not met ,ith 2 hours meeting the ,arrant. PIo Margarita Road Road Total Pedestrian Count crossing Margarlta Road (including adults) ~.M. = P.M. = 34 Total Pedestrian Count crossing Margarlta Road [School Children only) P.M. = 23 Z/9/98 HSB Collision Diagram East/West Street: MARGARITA ROAD North/South Street: PIO PICO ROAD From: 1/1/9;Z To: 3/31197 Date Prepared: 3/4/98 Number of Collisions 1_ Property Damage Only 3 Injury Collisions 0 Fatal Collisions 4 Total Collisions Le,qend L Right Turn ~ Moving Vehicle ~ Stopped Vehicle ~ Left Turn ~ BackingVehicle ~ Sideswipe ~ Ran Off Road ~' 4 ..... Movement <:3 Day Unknown ~ Night Pedestrian Fixed Object Bicycle DUI Injury Fatal SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Vet. 2.00A/McTRANS MARGARITA ROAD: PIO PICO TO JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... N/S DATE ............... 2/10/1998 TIME ............... 10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 80 17 0 0.0 0.0 - 18 0 0.0 0.0 70 19 0 0.0 0.0 - 20 0 0.0 0.0 60 21 0 0.0 0.0 - 22 0 0.0 0.0 50 23 0 0.0 0.0 - 24 0 0.0 0.0 40 25 0 0.0 0.0 - 26 0 0.0 0.0 30 27 0 0.0 0.0 - 28 0 0.0 0.0 20 29 0 0.0 0.0 - 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 1 0.7 0.7 36 0 0.0 0.7 37 1 0.7 1.4 38 2 1.4 2.9 39 3 2.2 5.0 40 6 4.3 9.4 41 4 2.9 12.2 - 42 8 5.8 18.0 - 43 11 7.9 25.9 - 44 12 8.6 34.5 - 45 12 8.6 43.2 10 46 14 10.1 53.2 - 47 20 14.4 67.6 - 48 18 12.9 80.6 - 49 12 8.6 89.2 - 50 8 5.8 95.0 5 51 3 2.2 97.1 - 52 1 0.7 97.8 - 53 1 0.7 98.6 - 54 1 0.7 99.3 - 55 1 0.7 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 46 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 49 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.6 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 5.0 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 9.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS ................. 35 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 139 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 45.7 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + ....+ 100 ****100 ** _ 90 , 10 ** _ + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 10 20 30 40 50 * 90 * 80 * 70 60 , _ 50 40 30 20 10 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 15 15 + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 10 20 30 40 50 ~ITE COOE: 00000000 ;TREET : Nargacita Road .INITS : South of Pjo Pico : N/B only CITY OF TENECULA NOl ,'f H Ou N P PAGE: 1 FILE: Nargpiol DATE: 2/02/g8 FINE NONDAY TUESDAY t~EDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY ~/EEI(DAY SATURDAY SUNDAY MEEK IEGIN 2 3 4 5 6 AVERAGE 7 8 AVERAGE I2:OOAR * 24 5 * * 14 * * 14 1:00 * 9 12 * * 10 * * 10 2:00 * 6 1 * * 3 * * 3 3:00 * 2 2 * * 2 * * 2 4:00 * 13 3 * * 8 * * 8 5:00 * 29 12 * * 20 * * ZO 6:00 0 77 0 * * 25 * * 25 7:00 101 227 * * * 164 * * 164 8:00 120 366 * * * 243 * * 243 9:00 74 228 * * * 150 * * 150 I0:00 67 219 * * * 143 * * 143 R:O0 86 135 * * * 110 * * 110 12:00 PN 103 165 * * * 1:$4 1:00 83 158 * * * 120 2:00 112 207 * * * 159 3:00 142 229 * * * 185 4:00 167 196 * * * 181 5:00 203 249 * * * 226 6:00 218 209 * * * 213 7:00 146 91 * * * 118 8:00 85 64 * * * 74 9:00 72 45 * * * 58 I0:00 60 14 * * * 37 11:00 28 8 * * * 18 * * 134 * * 120 * * 159 * * 185 * * 181 * * 226 * * 213 * * 118 * * 58 * * 37 * * 18 'OTALS 1867 2968 35 * * 2415 * * 2415 ~ AVG WItDAY 77.3 122.9 1,4 * ~ AVG DAY 77.3 122.9 1,4 * * * * PEAK HR 8:00 8:00 1:00 * * 8:00 * * 8:00 IOLUNE 120 366 12 * * 243 * * 243 PEAK HR 6:00 5:00 * * * 5:00 * * 5:00 IOLUNE 218 249 * * * 226 * * 226 MTE COOE: 00000000 STREET : Nargarita Road .INITS : North of Pjo Pjco : S/B only CITY OF TENECULA SOUTH OO D FINE NONDAY TUESOAY WEDNESOAY THURSDAY FRIDAY lEGIN 2 3 4 5 & WEEKDAY AVERAGE SATURDAY 7 PAGE: SUNDAY 8 1 FILE: mrgpio2 DATE: 2/02/98 WEEK AVERAGE 12:00 AN * 10 15 * * 12 * * 12 hO0 * 7 5 * * 6 * * 6 2:00 * 7 6 * * 6 * * 6 3:00 * 9 9 * * 9 * * 9 4:00 * 11 18 * * 5:00 * 61 51 * * 56 * * 56 6:00 0 99 99 * * 66 * * 6~, 7:00 2~7 269 62 * * 189 * * 189 8:00 269 263 * * * 266 * * 266 9:00 190 183 * * * 186 * * 186 I0:00 181 166 * * * 17"~ * * 173 11:00 222 187 * * * 204 * * 204 253 252 364 331 368 275 191 14,,6 111 62 29 3913 2:00 PN 280 226 * * * 1:00 281 223 * * * 2:00 366 362 * * * 3:00 354 3~. * * * 4:00 ~67 295 * * * 5:00 424 312 * * * 6:00 311 239 * * * 7:00 221 162 * * * 8:00 152 141 * * * 9:00 119 10) * * * 0:00 62 62 * * * 1:00 22 36 * * * OTALS 4058 3767 265 * * ;AVG I(/)AY 103.7 96.3 6.8 * * ;AVG DAY 103.7 96.3 6.8 * * 253 252 364 344 331 368 275 191 146 111 62 3913 PEAK HR 8:00 7:00 6:00 * * OLLINE 269 269 99 * * 8:00 266 8:00 266 N PEAK HR 5:00 2:00 * * * 5:00 * * 5:00 OLUNE 424 362 * * * ~ * * 368 SITE CCOE: 00000000 ~TREET : Pio Pico Rd. .IH1TS : West of Hacgerjt8 : E/B only CITY OF TENECULA EAST I oor',,tO rINE NONDAY TUESDAY kEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY lEGIN 2 3 4 5 6 12:00AN * 3 4 * * 1:00 * 1 I * * 2:00 * 1 0 w 3:00 * 0 2 * * 4:00 * I I * * 5:00 * I 2 * 6:00 1 5 2 * 7:00 12 18 9 * * 8:00 13 13 0 * * 9:00 16 10 * * * I0:00 12 7 * * * I1:00 10 7 * * * 12:00 PM 15 10 * * * hO0 8 9 * * * 2:00 17 17 * * * 3:00 25 22 * * * 4:00 ~ 36 * * * 5:00 58 38 * * * 6:00 22 19 * * * 7:00 13 12 * * * 8:00 10 18 * * * 9:00 8 10 w , , 0:00 12 4 * * * 1:00 I 1 * * * OTALS 282 261 21 * * ; AVG WIG)AY 106.8 99.6 8.0 * ; AVG DAY 106.8 99.6 8.0 * * MEEKDAY AVERAGE 3 1 0 1 1 1 2 13 8 13 9 8 12 8 17 23 32 48 20 12 14 9 8 1 SATURDAY 7 PAGE: SUNDAY 8 , , w , , w , , , , 1 FILE: pio~arg2 DATE: 2/02/98 WEEK AVERAGE 3 1 0 1 1 I 2 13 8 13 9 8 12 8 17 23 32 48 20 12 14 9 8 1 M PEAK HR 9:00 7:00 7:00 * * 7:00 'OLUNE 16 18 9 * w 13 7:00 13 PEAK HR 5:00 5:00 w , , 5:00 * * 5:00 OLUNE 58 ~ * w , 48 * * ~ ;ITE CODE: 00000000 ;TREET : Pio Pico Rd. %NITS : East of Nargarjta : W/B only C%TY OF TENECULA ST PSOuND PAGE: %RE NONDAY TUESOAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY WEEKDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY ;EGIN 2 3 4 5 6 AVERAGE 7 8 1 FILE: piomergl DATE: 2/02/98 WEEK AVERAGE 2:00 AN * 3 6 * * 4 * * 4 1:00 * I 2 * * 1 * * 1 2:00 * 3 2 * * 2 * * 2 5:00 * 14 10 * * 12 * * 12 4:00 * 55 48 * * 51 * * 51 5:00 * 171 1:56 * * 153 * * 153 6:00 0 205 171 * * 125 * * 125 7:00 82 251 112 * * 148 * * 148 8:00 245 253 1 * * 166 * * 166 9:00 99 110 * * * 104 * * 104 0:00 97 74 * * * 85 * * 85 1:00 121 101 * * * 111 * * 111 2:00 PN 112 87 * * * 99 * * 99 1:00 93 77 * * * 85 * * 85 2:00 146 150 * * * 148 * * 148 3:00 163 1:58 * * * 150 * * 150 4:00 117 108 * * * 112 * * 112 5:00 113 73 * * * 93 * * 93 6:00 105 102 * * * 103 * * 103 7:00 76 52 * * * 6/.> * * 64 8:00 54 51 * * * 52 w , 52 9:00 42 39 * * * 40 * * 40 0:00 18 24 * * * 21 * * 21 1:00 15 12 * * * 13 * * 13 1942 OTALS 1698 2154 488 AVG ~KDAY 87.4 110.9 25.1 . AVG DAY 87,4 110.9 25,1 1942 N PEAK HR 8:00 8:00 6:00 * * 8:00 OLUNE 245 253 171 * * 166 8:00 N PEAK HR 3:00 2:00 * * * 3:00 * * 3:00 OLUNE 163 150 * * * 150 * * 150 ITEM NO. 6 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission All Moghadam, P.E., Associate Engineer March 12, 1998 Item 6 Appointment of a Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner to the General Plan Circulation Element Update Committee RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission appoint a commission member to the General Plan Circulation Element Update Committee. BACKGROUND: Currently, a committee is being formed to direct the Circulation Element update efforts. This committee will consist of a City Council member, a Planning Commission member, a Public/Traffic Safety Commission member and a citizen-at-large member from the City of Temecula and the City of Murfieta. This committee will be responsible for reviewing and providing input during various stages of the Circulalion Element update program. FISCAL IMPACT: None ITEM NO. 7 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT CAPITAl, IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report December 1997 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Scott Harvey Date: January 16, 1998 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1.1-15/Winch~ter Road Interchange Modifications: All work has been completed except for plant establishment. Plant establishment work will continue for approximately one year. 2. 1-15/Rancho California Road lnterchaqge Modifications: The construction includes widening the south side of the bridge over the freeway, providing a new loop entrance ramp to northbound 1-15 Freeway from Rancho California Road, and relocation of the existing northbound exit ramp. Construction began on Monday, January 5. The first phase of construction will consist of the following: restriping Rancho California Road and portions of the 1-15 freeway, clearing excess vegetation, and grading the site to accommodate the new bridge supports. Traffic controls will be in place, and traffic will be allowed through the work area during construction. The estimated time for the entire project, including landscape improvements is 16 months. 3. City Wide Intelligent Traffic Man~eement System lITMS): All field work for llis project has been completed. The consultant has received the computer system per the project's specifications and is eurren~y installing the software. The complete system should be delivered by the end of January and it will be tes~d in February. The consultant will be monitoring the system and training the City staff for one year after the date of installation. 4. ADA lnlllrovement Project: Construction for this project began on January 5. This improvement project will include sidewalk access ramps, new playground equipment, and rubberized surfacing around existing play equipment for access by wheel chairs at Veterans Park, John Magee Park, and Calle Aragon Park as well as ADA improvements to Rancho Vksta fields at the Rancho California Sports Park. The contractor is presenfiy placing sidewalks at the Rancho California Sports Park. The project is scheduled for completion the second week of March. 5. Traffic Signal Installation at the Intersection of Margarita Rd. and Yukon Rd./Hunter Dr. The construction contract for lids project was approved by the City Council on October 28. The contractor has received the signal equipment and is eurren~y installing the underground conduits and pole foundations. The contractor anticipates that the signal will be in operation by the end of January. II. BID: 1. Marl,qrita Community Park: Bids were opened for this project on January 15. Staff will recommend award of bid to City Council at the February 10 meeting. The project improvements will include restrooms, parking areas, picnic areas, play equipmere, tennis coum, a roller hockey rink, ballfields, lighting, picnic shelters, sidewalks, landscaping with open turf areas as well as widening Margarita Road adjacent to the park to its nitimam width. Construction is anticipated to begin in March. 2. Winchester Creek Park: The project is currently oat for public bidding, which will close on January 22. The project consists of a 4.5 acre neighborhood park with various improvements including restspores, basketball courts, volleyball courts, play equipment, polygon shelters with picnic tables, concrete walkways, and a parking lot. Staff will recommend award of bid to City Council at the February 10 meeting. Construction is anticipated to begin by late March. 1II. WORK IN DESIGN: 1.1-15/Overland Drive Over Cros~in~ Inlprovement~: The roadway plans have been subnitted and signed by Caltrans (District 8). The structural plans have already been approved and signed by Caltrans, Division of Structures. SCE is also working on the design for the relocation of the existing 115, 33, & 12 KVA overhead power fines. These lines are scheduled to be relocated concurrently with the construction of the proposed Overland Drive Over Crossing Improvements. The transmission and distribution sections of SCE have ~nalised their alignment and the City has completed the legal descriptions and plats for the SCE easements and temporary construction easements. 2. FY96-97 Pavement Management System: A design amendment has been approved and the consullant is now field surveying for the driveway and curb & gutter removals. The consultant anticipates submitling plans for second review in three weeks. This project will provide street rehabilitation of jefferson Avenue from the northerly city limits to Raneho California Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire lenglh of the project. 3. Pavement Management System Up-Date: The consultant has completed the pubfie parking facilities report and is in the process of ~nalizing the P.M.S. Up-Date report for the entire city. This project will review and update the existing Pavement Management System computer program which will include new streets which were added to the City's maintained system, preparing a new 5-year street maintenance program. 4. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening: The consultant is presently addressing the City's plan check comments and expects to resubmit within two weeks. The Caltrans is reviewing Winchester Road Street Widening. Utility Companies are also reviewing the plans to identify potential conflicts with the proposed improvements. The scope of work includes the street widening improvements on the south side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, and the improvements on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive. S. Overland Drive Street Improvements & Margarita Road Street Widenip, S: The consultant is presently addressing the City's plan check comments and expects to resubmit within two weeks. The proposed improvements will be on Overland Drive between Ynez Road and Margarita Road and on Margatita Road from Overland Drive to W'mchester Road. Utility companies have been notified to address potential conflicts or new facilities which may be proposed. Also, storm drain plans have been submitted to R.C.F.C.D. for their review. The coatam expects the plan review to be completed by R.C.F.C.D. sooa. 6. Flashine Beacons at Various Locations: On January 9, the consultant submitted second plan check to the City. Staff anticipates returning the plans to the consultant the week of Januaty 19. The plans ate also being reviewed by Temecula Valley School District. This project consists of installing flashing beacons that warn of children in the immediate area at 10 different school sites throughout the City. 7. Cosmic Drive and Agena Street - Street Sidewalk Project The project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Cosmic Drive between Raneho California Road and Agena Street and south side of Agena Street between Santa Cecilia Drive and Cosmic Drive. The design is complete and the project is scheduled to bid by late January. 8. Marg~rita Road Sidewalk f!!anchn Visa to Pauba): The improvements will include the installation of concrete curbs, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margatita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauha Road. The sidewalk will be located across from the high school and also improve access to the Raneho California Sports Park. Also, as part of the design, addi~ve alternate improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarita Road to the adjacent hallfields along with an expanded parking area. Revisions to the drawings are eurfen~y underway with final submitlal of plans anticipated for the 3rd week in January. 9. 1-15/Winchester Southbound Off-ramp Widening: The consultant has completed the surveying, geotechuical, and environmental work for this project. The project will provide an additional left turn lane from the southbound off-ramp onto Winchester Road. This project will also require a retaining wall between the southbound off-ramp and the southbound loop on-ramp due to the existing grades in the area of the ramp widening. The consuitant is expected to submit the first plan check to Caltrans and the City the week of January 26. 10. Winchester Road Median Islands: The consultant submitled first plan check to the City on January 7 and staff returned the plan check to the consultant on January 13. This project includes installation of median islands with landscaping and irrigation along Winchester Road between Enterprise Circle West and Jefferson Avenue along with the installation of a traffic signal at Enterprise Circle West. Also, the existing median island at Jefferson Avenue will be modified to provide for a longer left turn pocket for east bound traffic. R:'~MOACTRPT%CIP%98~JAN.MAR ,eh 11. pain Road Bridge: A Consultant is in the process of preparing the preliminary documentation required by Caltrans to receive HBRR Funds as well as performing utility research and design surveys. This project will include the realignmere of Pain Road from Highway 79 South to Rainbow Canyon Road, which will require that a new bridge be construeled, two new traffic signals to be installed, the removal of one traffic signal, the installation of sound walls, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, bike lanes, signing, striping, channel improvements, and provisions for Wedand Mitigation. 12. Winchester Sidewalk: A consultant has been selected and the design ks expected to start during the last week of January. This project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Winchester Creek Avenue. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report January 1998 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Scott Harvey Date: February 13, 1998 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. 1-15/Winche~ter Road lnterchaqee Modifications: All work has been completed except for plant establishment, Plant establishment work wilt continue for approximately one year. 2. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchaqge Modifications: The construction includes widening the south side of the bridge over the freeway, providing a new loop entrance ramp to northbound 1-15 Freeway from Rancho California Road, and relocalion of the existing northbound exit ramp. The contractor has completed the grading work for the bridge abutments, however, a period of 60 days is normally required for soil settlement before bridge abutment construction can begin. Construction of the retaining wall on the south side of Rancho California Road adjacent to Kentucky Fried Chicken is scheduled to begin during the week of February 16. Electronic message signs have been placed on the 1-15 freeway in both directions to update motorists on construction and alternate routes. These signs will be operational during construction hours only. Traffic controls will be in place, and traffic will be allowe~ through the work area during construction. The estimated time for the entire project improvements is 16 months. 3. City Wide Intelligent Traffic Man~Igement System fiTMS): All field work for this project has been completed. The consuitant has received the computer system per the project's specifications and is currently installing the software. The complete system shotrid be delivered by the end of January and it will be tested in February. The consultant will be monitoring the system and training the City staff for one year after the date of installation. 4. ADA Inlprovement PrOject: This improvement project includes sidewalk access ramps, new playground equipment, and rubberized surfacing around existing play equipment for access by wheel chairs at Veterans Park, John Magee Park, and Calle Aragon Park as well as ADA improvements to Rancho Vista fields at the Rancho California Sports Park. The contractor has installed the pedestrian bridge and is presently completing placement of sidewalks at the Rancho California Sports Park. Work at the other three smaller parks will begin the third week of February. The project is scheduled for completion in early April. 5. Traffic S~lal Installation at the Intersection of MargaritaRd. and Yukon Rd./Hunter Dr. This traffic signal was turned on February 11. After the documents required by the contract are submitled by the contractor, staff will recommend that the project be accepted by the City Council. R:',MOACTRPT\CIPIBB~,FEB,MAR seh 6. Murgarita Community Park: City Council awarded a construction contract for the Margarita Community Park Project to EDGE Development, Inc. on Febnmry 10. The project improvements will include restrooms, parking areas, picnic areas, play equipment, tennis courts, a roller hockey rink, ballfields, lighting, picnic shelters, sidewalks, landscaping with open tuff areas as well as widening Margarita Road adjacent to the park to its ultimate width. Construction is anticipated to begin by late March. 7. Winchester Creek Park: City Council awarded a construction contract for the Winchester Creek Park Project to Terra-Cal Construction, Inc. on February 10. The project consists of a 4.5 acre neighborhood park with various improvements including restrooms, basketball courts, volleyball courts, play equipment, polygon shelters with picnic tables, concrete walkways, and a parking lot. Construction is anticipated to begin by late March. II. BID: 1. Traffic Signal at Pauba Road and Fire Station 84 The bid opening will be on February 19 and the project should be completed by May. This project will be installing a traffic signal on Pauba Road in front of the Fire Station 84. 2. Traffic Signal at Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway The bid opening will be on February 19 and the project should be completed by June. This project will be installing a traffic signal on Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway. 3. Traffic Signal at Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road The bid opening will be on February 19 and the project should be completed by June. This project will be installing a temporary traffic signal on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road. HI. WORK IN DESIGN: 1. 1-15/Overland Drive Over Crossing ln~rovements: The roadway plans have been submilled and signed by Caltrans (District 8). The structural plans have already been approved and signed by Caltrans, Division of Structures. SCE is also working on the design for the relocation office existing 115, 33, & 12 KVA overhead power lines. These lines are scheduled to be reloeated concurrently with the construction of the proposed Overland Drive Over Crossing Improvements. The transmission and distribution seelions of SCE have ~nallzed their alignment. The City is in the process of aeqniring right of way, utility easements and temporary construction easements necessary for the project. 2. FY96-97 Pavement Mnn~ement System: The consultant is expected to submit the first plan cheek to the City by February 13. Starf expects to return the plan check within two weeks after the submittal date. This project will provide street rehabilitation of Jefferson Avenue from the northerly city limits to Rancho California Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire length of the project. 3. Pavement Management S~tem Un-Date: The consultant has completed the public parking facilities' report and has submitted the P.M.S. Up-Date reports for City's review. This project will review and update the existing Pavement Management System computer program which will include new streets which were added to the City 's maintained system, preparing a new 5-year street maintenance program. 4. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening: Caltrans has completed their first plan check on February I0. The consultant expects to return the plans to Caltrans within three weeks. Utility Companies are also reviewing the plans to identify potential conflicts with the proposed improvements. The scope of work includes the street widening improvements on the south side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, and the improvements on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive. 5. Overland Drive Street lnl0rovements & Margarita Road Street Widening: The consultant is presently addressing the City's and Riverside County Flood Control's plan check conunents and expects to resubmit within two weeks. The proposed improvements will be on Overland Drive between Ynez Road and Margarita Road and on Margarita Road from Overland Drive to Winchester Road. Utility companies have been notified to address potential conflicts or new facilities which may be proposed. 6. Fla,~hi~lg Beacons at Various Locations: The consultant is expected to submit the lhird plan check to the City by February 13. Starf expects to return the plan check within two weeks after the submittal date. The plans have also been reviewed by Temecula Valley School District. This project consists of installing flashing beacons that warn of children in the immediate area at 10 different school sites throughout the City. 7. Cosmic Drive and Agena Street - Street Sidewalk Project #6: The project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Cosmic Drive between Rancho California Road and Agena Street and south side of Agena Street between Sanla Cecilia Drive and Cosmic Drive. The project is presently out to public bidding with bid opening is scheduled for February 26. Consauction is anticipated to begin in mid April. 8. l%4argarita Road Sidewalk (Rancho Vista to Pauba~: Second plan check was completed by the consultant on February 10. The improvements will include the installation of concrete curbs, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The sidewalk will be located across from the high school and also improve access to the Raneho California Sports Park. Also, as part of the design, additive alternate improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarila Road to the adjacent baHfields along with an expanded parking area. The project is anticipated to bid in early March. R:~MOACTRPT%CIP\98\FEB.MAR eeh 9. l-IS/Winchester Southbound Off~raq~p Widening: The consultant has submitted the first plan check to the City and Caltrans. The project will provide an additional turning lane from the southbound off-ramp onto Winchester Road. This project will also require a retaining wall between the somhbound off-ramp and the southbound loop on-ramp due to the existing grades in the area of the ramp widening. The consultant is expecting the first plan check to be returned by Caltrans in mid-March. 10. Winch~ter Road Median l~lm~ds: The consultant submitted second plan check to the City on January 27 and staff returned the plan check on February 4. This project includes installation of median islands with landscaping and irrigation along Winchester Rood between Enterprise Circle West and Jefferson Avenue along with the installation of a traffic signal at Enterprise Circle West. Also, the existing median island at Jefferson Avenue will be modified to provide for a longer left turn pocket for east bound traffic. 11. Pala Road Bridge: A Consultant is in the process of preparing the preliminary documentation required by Caltrans to receive HBRR Funds as well as performing utility research;and design surveys. This project will include the realignment of Pala Road from Highway 79 South to Rainbow Canyon Road, which will require that a new bridge be conswucted, two new traffic signals to be installed, the removal of one traffic signal, the installation of sound walls, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, bike lanes, signing, striping, channel improvements, and provisions for Wedand Mitigation. 12. Winchester Sidewalk: On February 10, the City Council approved the appropriation of funds for this project. The consultant has obtained a permit from Calwans to perform the surveying for this project. The consultant expects to start the design of the project within two weeks. This project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Winchester Creek Avenue. 13. Duck Pond Park: The Duck Pond Park Project will include both park and offsite street improvements. Park improvements will include a gazebo/bandstand, picnic facilities, a restroom, walkways, a parking lot, security lighting, monumentalion, landscaping and irrigation. The street improvements will consist of the widening of Ynez Road to full width between Rancho California Road and Tierra Vista Road and will include new sidewalks along with additional turn lanes, traffic signal modifications at Ynez Road and Rancho California Road and pavement re-striping to improve traffic circulation. First plan check is presently traderway. Public bidding for this project is anticipated to begin in March. 14. CRC Gymnasium Air Conditioning S~tem: Since the opening of the Temecula Community Recreation Center gymnasium the facility has operated without an air conditioning or cooling system. High temperatures during the warm summer months result in unusually uncomfortable conditions for patrons who participate in baskethall leagues and other programs. This project will provide for the installation of an. air conditioning and temperature control system for the CRC Gymnasium. Design of the A/C system by the consultant has been completed and the plans are in final plan check. Public bidding is anticipated to begin the end of February. R:',MOACTRPT%CIP\98XFEB.MAR ~eh 15. Traffic Signak: Currenfiy there are three new ~'affic signals under design. The three intersections include Solana Way at Margarita Road, Margarita Road at Santiago Road, and Rancho California Road at Via Los Colinas. LAND DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT SPECIAL PROJECTS DECEMBER 1997 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Ronald J. Parks Date: January 20, 1997 1. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor: The Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S) interchange improvements including the design of Front Street realignment and its intersection with Western Bypass Corridor has been advertized for bid. The bid opening is scheduled for January. Phase II of the Rogersdale Entertainment Center (Buffman) which is the onsite development plan was approved by the Planning Commission. Staff began review of the first submittal of the Rough Grading Plans for the Entertainment Center. Review will resume upon submittal of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor plans and payment of review fees from the Applicant. 2. PW95-08 - First Street Extension: The negotiation between the City Attorney's Office and the affected property owners for acquisitions are ongoing. Plans and specifications finalization will resume once all necessary acquisitions have been finaled. 3. PW95-26 - 6th Street Parking PrOject: Awaiting the receipt of the Contractor's affidavit and maintenance bond. The project's completion will be noticed once said documents are received. The Edison Company's contractor completed the installation of two charging station devices in the parking area for electrical vehicles. PW96-05 - PrOject Study Report (PSR) And Project Report (PRI For Ultimate Interchange ImiTrovements at Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S): The consultant selection for updating the Circulation Element of the General Plan is in progress. The PSR analysis will resume once the update on the Circulation Element of the General Plan is finated. The review of the Margarita Canyon commercial subdivision Tentative Map submittals is in progress and the necessary reports addressing the environmental issues need to be submitted by the Applicant for review. 5. General Plan Circulation Element Update: We are in the process of selecting a panel to interview the consultants who submitted proposals to conduct the update. 6. The Regional Mall PrOject: The plans for the mall site perimeter infrastructure improvements are near completion. The design of the onsite precise grading and improvements plans are in progress according to schedule. LAND DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT SPECIAL PROJECTS JANUARY 1998 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Ronald J. Parks Date: February 12, 1998 1. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor: The bid opening date for the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S) interchange improvements including Front Street realignment and its intersection with Western Bypass Corridor is moved to mid-February. 2. PW95-08 - First Street Extension: The negotiation between the City Attorney's Office and the affected property owners have been completed. Plans and specifications will be modified to include construction of First Street from Front Street to Pujol Street including the bridge over Murrieta Creek, 3. PW95-26 - 6th Street Parking Project: The contractor's bonding company has payed off most of the sub-contractors and suppliers and most of the stop notices from said parties have been released. Once all of the stop notices have been released and the Contractor submits the affidavit and maintenance bond, the notice of completion will be filed. PW96-05 - Project Study Report IPSR) And Project Report IPR) For Ultimate Interchange Improvements at Interstate 15/State Route 79 South 11-15/SR79S): The consultant selection for updating the Circulation Element of the General Plan has been completed. The PSR analysis will resume once the update on the Circulation Element of the General Plan is finaled. 5. General Plan Circulation Element Update: A panel comprised of our City's elected and appointed officials, Mayor Roberts and Commissioner Guerriero respectively, City's staff from Planning and Public Works Department, and representatives from City of Murrieta conducted the interviews and the consultants were rated. The scope of work will be further refined and circulated to concerned parties for concurrence. The recommendation for the tasks to be performed will be presented before our City Council for approval before a contract agreement is processed with the selected consultant. 6. The Regional Mall Project: The design of the perimeter infrastructure improvements are in progress. The consultants are in the process of revising the plans per the plan check comments. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District have indicated that they will not be maintaining the onsite storm drain system and per our agreement with Forest City, City would have to maintain those storm drain systems. MEMORANDUM TO-' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Sra Suron. Mainte.ance Su.erinten a.t January 5, 1998 Monthly Activity Report - December, 1997 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of December, 1997: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 74 B. Total signs installed 0 C. Total signs repaired II. III. IV. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned VI. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. lo.570 20 1.986 VII. STENCILING A. 96 B. 385 New and repainted legends L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping ]- R:'uMAINTAINV~4OACTRPT\g7~DECEMBER,WPO Also, City Maintenance staff responded to_5.6_ service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to32 service order requests for the month of November. 1997. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 162 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of December. 1997 was $118,341.79 compared to $7,246.00 for the month of November, 1997. Account No, 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 82,830.79 30,543.00 4,968.00 CC: Ron Parks, Principal Engineer ~ Land Development Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent February 2, 1998 Monthly Activity Report - January, 1998 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of January, 1998: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 72 B. Total signs installed 21 C. Total signs repaired II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 93 III. POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired 578 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 22 B. Total S.F. 3.083 VII. STENCILING A. 65 New and repainted legends B. 0 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping R:~qAINTAIN\MOACTRPT%98LIANUARY,RPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 40 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 56 service order requests for the month of December, 1997. The Maintenance Crew has also put in52 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January. 1998 was $193.867.46 compared to $ 118,341.79 for the month of December. 1997. Account No. 5402 $ 188,567.46 Account No. 5401 $ 3,875.00 Account No, 999-5402 $ 1,425.00 CC: Ron Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development All Moghadam, Associate Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) m 0 ~ I I TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent March 2, 1998 Monthly Activity Report - February, 1998 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of February, 1998: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 25 B. Total signs installed 7 C. Total signs repaired 0 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 14 III. POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 598 VI. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 3 B. Total S.F. 387 VII. STENCILING A. 84 New and repainted legends B. 4.691 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 56 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 40 service order requests for the month of JAnuary. 1998. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 318 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of Febru,arv. 1998 was $ 64.012.50 compared to $ 193,867.46 for the month of J~nu~ry. 1998. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $ 37,449.00 $ 21,015.00 $ 5,548.00 CC: Ron Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development All Moghadam, Associate Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) ITEM NO. 8 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 · Mailing Address: P O Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 92589-9033 (909) 6946444 · Fa~ (909) 694-1999 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: City Council Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ronald Bradley, City Manager January 20, 1998 POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR December, 1997 The following report reflects Part One crimes, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during December of 1997. Part One crime statistics are displayed by district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Departmere issued 735 traffic citations last month, which compares with 512 issued in December of 1996. The number of injury accidents decreased while the number of non-injury collisions increased this month as compared to December of 1996. Temecula experienced no fatal traffic collisions in December. An'ests for driving under the influence of alcohol decreased slightly from December of 1996. Robberies decreased significantly while felony assaults increased compared to one year ago. Reported burglaries decreased slightly while grand thefts increased compared to December 1996. Auto thefts decreased slightly over last year. Arrests made during the month were down significantly from the previous year's figure. The Police Department responded to fifty-three "priority one" calls for service during the month of December, with an average response time of approximately 5.2 minutes. A total of 2,462 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. DtLring the month of December, the Temecula Police Department' s storefrom served a total of 233 people. The number of citizens utilizing this facility remained fai~y steady although there is an increase in the number of activities performed by staff. Sixty-five people were fingerprinted, twenty- four people made police reports, twenty-five people had citations signed off and eight solicitor's POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY December, 1997 permits were issued. In addition, two juveniles wer. e provided with counseling at the request of their parents. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special holiday events during the month. Officer Fanene also wrote an article for the Valley Business Journal on the topic of finding a quality day care facility. The POP Team of Deputies Jeff Kubel and Steve Mike completed one TAG (Temecula Against Graffiti) program focusing on problem sites however, no arrests were made. On December 31, the traffic team conducted its monthly Operation ERACIT DUI program. The operation resulted in the arrest of seven persons for DUI. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral past of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Ed Bekas, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 580 hours of service in December. Temecula Police Department Monthly Statistics December 1997 Prepared: January 1998 I Table of:Contents Statistical Information Map of Districts ......................................................................... December 1997 Crime and Activity Totals ...................................... Page 1 2 Graphs Part 1 Property Crimes ............................................................... Part 1 Persons Crimes .............................................................. Activity Breakdown by District ..................................................... Burglaries by District ................................................................. Burglary Comparison ................................................................ Arrest Statistics ........................................................................ Miscellaneous Activity ............................................................... Traffic Violations ....................................................................... Traffic Collisions ...................................................................... Narcotic Activity ....................................................................... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CRIME A B C D E F G H HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAPE ROBBERY 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 FELONY ASSAULT 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 TOTAL PERSONS I 01 2l 0l 01 Sl 11 01 01 BURGLARY 2 6 1 0 2 9 1 0 GRAND THEFT 0 1 1 1 2 5 3 2 AUTO THEFT 0 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PROPERTY I 2l 91 3l 11 41 171 Sl 2l GRAND TOTAL 2 11 3 I 9 18 5 2 HAZARD QTES 15 13 16 3 41 73 11 2 NON-HAZARD CITES 9 8 3 3 34 18 7 11 PARKING CITES 28 7 6 9 17 148 2 28 TOTAL CITES I S2l 28l 25l lSl 92l 239l 20l 41l DIST. PEACE 4 12 10 0 12 1 13 6 SHOPLIFT 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 PETTY THEFT 3 3 3 0 I 5 5 0 VANDALISM 3 1 5 0 1 2 4 4 MISD. ASSAULT 3 1 1 2 2 1 4 6 ALARMS 15 25 21 60 82 44 0 20 PUBLIC INTOX. 0 0 0 1 8 2 1 0 DUl 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 TiC INJURY 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 FATAL T/C TOTAL TIC I 41 31 21 OI 221 441 31 Sl 31 RESID. BURGLARY 0 5 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 COMM. BURGLARY 1 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 OTHER BURGLARY 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VEHICLE BURGLARY 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 2 0 I SUB-TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 01 8 0 21 0 15 0 7 0 0 01 43 0 51 1 175 2 95 5 250 81 520 1 59 0 10 2 22 1 21 1 21 10 277 0 12 0 5 427 4 82 0 86 9 11 1 8 TOTAL ARRESTS I 61 71 6l 41 141 161 Sl 7l OI TOTALACT/V'rTY I 861 841 701 791 2311 3681 s51 8sl 261 47 18 65 1084 Page 2 CRZME ] K L H N O P Q SUB-TOTAL TOTAL HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 FELONY ASSAULT 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 8 14 TOTAL PERSONS I 01 21 11 01 21 01 31 01 81 16 BURGLARY 0 4 1 0 2 1 2 1 11 32 GRAND THEFT 2 8 2 0 0 0 4 0 16 31 AUTO THEFT 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PROPERTY I 21 141 31 01 21 11 61 11 291 72 GRAND TOTAL 2 16 4 0 4 I 9 I 37 88 HAZARD CITES 8 34 3 10 6 1 5 19 86 261 NON-HAZARD CITES 8 1 0 2 0 1 7 15 34 129 PARKING CITES 25 21 12 5 4 1 8 19 95 345 TOTALC'IrTES 1411 56 lsl 171 101 31 201 531 2151 735 DIST. PEACE 17 14 7 1 5 0 11 4 59 118 SHOPLI FT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 12 PETTY THEFT 4 5 2 0 4 0 3 1 19 41 VANDALISM 6 6 2 0 1 0 7 2 24 45 MISD. ASSAULT 2 2 2 0 4 0 3 5 18 39 ALARMS 56 31 9 0 12 3 13 10 134 411 PUBLIC INTOX. 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 26 DUI 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 9 TIC INJURY 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 6 TIC NON-INJURY 1 1 101 FATAL TIC 0 0 TOTAL T/C I 21 61 21 11 2 11 61 11 211 107 RESID. BURGLARY 0 4 1 0 1 1 2 0 9 18 COMM. BURGLARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 OTHER BURGLARY 0 0 ,0 0 1 0 0 1 2 3 VEHICLE BURGLARY 1 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 10 18 FELONY ARRESTS 21 TOTAL ARRESTS I 271 81 11 01 21 01 61 31 471 112 TOTAL ACT'rV'rTY 11441 1391 431 191 421 81 731 791 5471 1631 Page 3 0 W 0 ~ o! LLI z~ D~ O._ L.U 0 n U U U 0 0 0 E Z 0  Addm~ P O Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 92589-9033 RECEIVED TO: City Council Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ronald Bradley, City Manager FEB 18 1998 CITY OF 3'EMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMEi',,' DATE: February 17, 1998 POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR January, 1998 The following report reflects Part One crimes, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during January of 1998. Part One crime statistics are displayed by district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department issued 899 traffic citations last month, which compares with 36l issued in January of 1997. The number of injury accidents increased slightly while the number of non-injury collisions decreased this month as compared to January of 1997. Temecula experienced no fatal traffic collisions in January. Arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol decreased by one from January of 1997. Robberies decreased significantly while felony assaults decreased slightly compared to one year ago. Reported burglaries and grand thefts decreased slightly compared to January 1997. Auto theRs increased over last year. Arrests made during the month increased significantly from the previous year's figure. The Police Department responded to forty "priority one" calls for service during the month of January, with an average response time of approximately 5.2 minutes. A total of 2,715 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of January, the Temecula Police Department's storefront served a total of 215 people. The number of citizens utilizing this facility continues to remain fairly steady although there is an increase in the number of activities performed by staff. Ninety-four people were fingerprinted, eighteen people made police reports, twenty people had citations signed off and two solicitor's permits were issued. POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY January, 1998 Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene conducted a Stranger Danger presentation for Brownie Troop 480 and fingerprinted each of the nine participants for the Child ID program. The POP Team of Officers Jeff Kubel and Steve Mike completed one TAG (Temecula Against Graffiti) program focusing on problem sites however, no arrests were made. The POP Team of Officers Dave Haar and Vicky Carver participated in a certification ceremony at Rancho West Apartments on Pujol on January 17. This complex is the first in the city to complete the Crime Free Multi Housing Program and become certified. The property was prominently posted as being a qualifying complex. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Ed Bekas, the Police Department's voltmteer staff contributed 667 hours of service in January. Temecula Police Department Monthly Statistics January 1998 Prepared: February 1998 Table:O ; ! 6 t nts Statistical Information Map of Districts ......................................................................... January 1998 Crime and Activity Totals ...................................... Paqe 1 2 Graphs Part 1 Property Crimes ............................................................... Part I Persons Crimes .............................................................. Activity Breakdown by District ..................................................... Burglaries by District ................................................................. Burglary Comparison ................................................................ Arrest Statistics ........................................................................ Miscellaneous Activity ............................................................... Traffic Violations ....................................................................... Traffic Collisions ...................................................................... Narcotic Activity ....................................................................... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CRTt, IE A B C D E F G H Z SUB-TOTAL HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 FELONY ASSAULT 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 ~ TOTAL PERSONS I ol 11 ol o 11 ol 31 11 ol 6 BURGLARY 0 0 0 6 4 6 3 1 0 20 GRAND THEFT 0 1 1 I 4 2 2 2 0 13 AUTO THEFT 1 1 1 4 1 2 1 2 0 13 ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PROPERTY I ~1 21 21 1~1 9 zol 61 5 oI 46 GRAND TOTAL I 3 2 11 10 10 9 6 0 52 HAZARD CITES 20 43 10 5 47 148 67 20 6 366 NON-HAZARD CITES 1 4 1 1 14 14 13 5 0 53 PARKING CITES 14 0 3 3 9 73 9 22 4 137 TOTALCTTES I 351 471 14 91 701 2351 891 471 101 556 DIST. PEACE 2 9 13 0 6 7 14 10 4 65 SHOPLIFT 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 pETTY THEFT 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 5 1 12 VANDALISM 1 0 1 3 2 5 1 1 2 16 'MISD. ASSAULT 2 4 3 0 1 0 1 4 0 15 ALARMS 6 13 5 35 62 42 1 9 9 182 PUBLIC INTOX, 2 1 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 11 DU~ 1 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 2 12 TIC INJURY 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 T/C NON-I NJ URY 12 FATAL TIC 0 TOTAL TIE I 21 01 ~1 01 Sl 41 11 21 ~1 16 RESID, BURGLARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 COMM. BURGLARY 0 0 0 3 3 6 0 1 0 13 OTHER BURGLARY 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 VEHICLE BURGLARY 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 9 TOTAL ARRESTS I 71 81 7] 31 91 ~Sl 1~1 el 21 70 TOTALACTTVZTY I 521 771 401 591 1641 3121 ~231 841 291 940 Page 2 CP~ME 3 K L M N HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 ROBBERY 1 0 0 0 0 FELONY ASSAULT '1 2 2 1 0 TOTAL PERSONS I 21 21 2 11 ol BURGLARY 1 0 0 0 1 GRAND THEFT 0 1 0 0 1 AUTO THEFT 4 3 0 0 0 ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PROPERTY I 51 41 o ol 21 GRAND TOTAL 7 6 2 i 2 HAZARD CITES 14 64 12 63 2 NON-HAZARD CITES 6 3 1 2 0 PARKING CITES 24 14 8 5 6 TOTALCZTES I 441 811 211 701 81 DIST. PEACE 11 24 10 0 9 SHOPLIFT 0 2 0 0 0 PETTY THEFT 7 4 1 0 1 VANDALISM 4 5 4 1 0 MISD. ASSAULT 3 12 1 1 1 ALARMS 23 18 11 10 14 PUBLIC INTOX. 9 1 0 1 0 DUI 0 0 0 2 0 T/C INJURY 0 1 1 2 0 T/C NON-INJURY FATAL T/C TOTALT/C I sl 31 sl 41 01 RESID. BURGLARY 1 0 0 0 1 COMM. BURGLARY 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER BURGLARY 0 0 0 0 0 VEHICLE BURGLARY 0 0 0 0 0 O P Q SUB-TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 6 11 ol ol ol 71 13 0 0 0 2 22 0 0 0 2 15 0 2 1 10 23 0 0 0 0 0 ol 21 11 141 6o 0 2 I 21 73 0 23 55 233 599 0 7 12 31 84 2 13 7 79 216 21 431 741 3431 899 0 9 4 67 132 0 0 1 3 6 1 0 1 15 27 0 0 3 17 33 0 1 3 22 37 4 10 9 99 281 0 2 1 14 25 0 0 0 2 14 sl 221 221 2391 sss 1 22 0 OI 41 21 lsI 31 0 2 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 9 MISD. ARRESTS FELONY ARRESTS TOTALARRESTS I 211 81 41 31 ol 11 41 sl 22 461 116 TOTALACTZV'rTY 11091 1561 5~.1 901 351 71 711 991 6s-81 1558 Page 3 III isis ,,!,=1 C~ 0 ~ v -- 0 ~ o II 0 0o~ w O~ w ~ · [] 0 oo d > w -- c~ o ~ ITEM NO. 9 FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ITEM NO. 10 COMMISSION REPORTS