Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
082217 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 22, 2017 — 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:00 PM - The City Council will convene in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—PENDING LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to one matter of pending litigation: Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association v. City of Temecula, Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC1512880. Next in Order: Ordinance: 17-06 Resolution: 17-48 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards Prelude Music: TVCA Chamber Musicians – Caroline Nguyen, Joseph Campbell and Michael May Invocation: Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel Temecula Valley Flag Salute: Mayor Pro Tem Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Rahn, Stewart, Edwards PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac for Receiving General Motors Business Elite Mark of Excellence Dealer Award Presentation of National Preparedness Month Proclamation Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Jerzy Kanigowski, Bill McAteer, and Bruce Wedeking 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of August 8, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of August 8, 2017. 3 Approve the List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 2 4 Adopt Ordinance 17-05 Amending Chapter 15.08, Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program, and Finding this Action Exempt from CEQA (Second Reading) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 17 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, AND FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA 5 Approve the Second Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with Park Consulting Group for Technology Services RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve a Second Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with Park Consulting Group to extend the term to June 30, 2019, and to increase the authorized contract amount in the amount of $100,000 for technology services, for a total agreement amount of $150,000 6 Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Michelle's Place for the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope (At the Request of Economic Development Committee Mayor Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Michelle's Place for city -support costs, in the amount of $250 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope. 7 Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild for the 2017 Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show (At the Request of Economic Development Committee Mayor Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild for city -support costs, in the amount of $1,900 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the 2017 Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show. 3 8 Approve an Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Rene B. Martinez, Sr. dba Rene's Commercial Management for Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services, and Approve an Appropriation from the General Fund Reserve RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve an Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Rene B. Martinez, Sr. dba Rene's Commercial Management, in the amount of $100,000, for Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services; 8.2 Approve an appropriation, in the amount of $100,000, from the General Fund Reserve. 9 Receive and File Temporary Street Closure for 2017 Autumnfest Events RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager: Temporarily close certain streets for the following 2017 Autumnfest Events: WESTERN DAYS HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR GREEK FESTIVAL VETERAN'S DAY PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DAY 10 Summarily Vacate Restricted Access Along a Portion of Rancho California Road at Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 19580-1 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO SUMMARILY VACATE RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG A PORTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 19580-1, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE 11 Summarily Vacate Restricted Access Along a Portion of Rancho California Road at Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 35481 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: 4 RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO SUMMARILY VACATE RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG A PORTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 35481, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE 12 Approve Tract Map 36479 (Located at the Southeast Corner of Nicolas Road and Via Lobo) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Tract Map 36479 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 12.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond as security for the Agreement; 12.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monumentation Bond as security for the Agreement. ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: CSD 17-01 Resolution: CSD 17-05 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Stewart, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 13 Approve the Action Minutes of August 8, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of August 8, 2017. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next adjourned meeting: Tuesday, September 5, 2017, with regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 6 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — No Meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY — No Meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY — No Meeting RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 14 Adopt Weed Abatement Lien Resolution for Fiscal Year 2016-17 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-17 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 15 Community Development Department Monthly Report 16 Fire Department Monthly Report 17 Police Department Monthly Report 18 Public Works Department Monthly Report BOARD/COMMISSION REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next adjourned meeting: Tuesday, September 5, 2017, with regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 7 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports and public Closed Session information) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694- 6444. 8 PRESENTATIONS City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition Presented on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of the City of Temecula to: Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac recently earned General Motors Business Elite Mark of Excellence Award for the fourth consecutive year. The Business Elite Mark of Excellence Award, one of the highest honors in the industry, is a symbol of exceptional performance in sales and customer satisfaction. Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac is one of ten Chevrolet Business Elite dealerships to receive this award out of General Motors 4,500 dealerships across the United States. We are proud of Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac for earning this prestigious award and we thank them for their commitment to complete customer satisfaction and for delivering high quality automobiles and outstanding service to the community. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this twenty- second day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk Si Si , .sJ yryyyr ry �����0.R6R6R��I�Wi����G ` _ 1 F' � � t'!�� ��� maeaewm yyry M1—...: ..����, •wwwwaY man j: i����� ����t � ..,,p,p«�n,.,„a'P.:?!:'i:ll:� � u,¢p�a "` - �� •. l �� �AR �wwww. _ pp,, ,,pp The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, "National Preparedness Month," occurring each year in September, creates an important opportunity for every resident of Riverside County to prepare their homes, businesses, and communities for any type of emergency including natural disasters and potential terrorist attacks; and WHEREAS, investing in the preparedness of ourselves, our families, businesses, and communities can reduce fatalities and economic devastation in our communities and in our nation; and WHEREAS, injury and loss of life is avoidable when individuals take responsibility for preparing their families and their communities; and WHEREAS, Emergency Management programs such as its RivCoReady campaign, Federal Emergency Management Agency's Ready Campaign, Citizen Corps, and other federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, private, and volunteer agencies are working to increase public activities in preparing for emergencies and to educate individuals on how to take action; and WHEREAS, emergency preparedness is the responsibility of every citizen of Riverside County and all citizens are urged to make preparedness a priority and work together as a team, to ensure that individuals, families, and communities are prepared for disasters and emergencies of any type; and WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has announced the 2017 National Preparedness Month theme of "Disasters Don't Plan Ahead. You Can;" and WHEREAS, all citizens of Riverside County are encouraged to prepare an emergency communication plan, participate in citizen preparedness activities, and visit the county's preparedness campaign's website at RivCoReady.org for important preparedness tips and information. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Maryann Edwards, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, do hereby proclaim the month of September, 2017 to be "National Preparedness Month" and call on all government agencies, private organizations, and the people and businesses to develop their own emergency preparedness plan, and work together toward creating a more prepared society. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this twenty-second day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition Presented on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of the City of Temecula to: Jerzy Kanigowski The City Council is proud to present this Certificate of Recognition to Jerzy Kanigowski, employee number 102. For 26 years Jerzy has dedicated himself to serving the City of Temecula. During his tenure, Jerzy served in the Department of Community Services and the Department of Public Works. Jerzy supported and played a vital role in many successes, including managing contracts for the Department of Public Works, and procurement for numerous services for one of the largest City departments with an annual operating budget in excess of $5 million. Jerzy's attitude of service before self has made a lasting and positive impact on the City of Temecula and its employees, residents and businesses alike. We are grateful for Jerzy's many contributions to our community and we wish him happiness and success in all his future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this twenty- second day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition Presented on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of the City of Temecula to: Bill McAteer The City Council is proud to present this Certificate of Recognition to Bill McAteer, employee number 385. For 13 years, Bill has dedicated himself to serving the City of Temecula. During his tenure, Bill served in the Department of Public Works. Bill supported and played a vital role in many successes, including managing construction of Temecula Public Library, Temecula Community Center, Civic Center and Parking Structure, Old Town Community Theatre, and Fire Station 73, among many other significant construction projects. Bill's attitude of service before self has made a lasting and positive impact on the City of Temecula and its employees, residents and businesses alike. We are grateful for Bill's many contributions to our community and we wish him happiness and success in all his future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this twenty- second day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Recognition Presented on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of the City of Temecula to: Bruce Wedeking The City Council is proud to present this Certificate of Recognition to Bruce Wedeking, employee number 232. For 20 years Bruce has dedicated himself to serving the City of Temecula. During his tenure, Bruce served in the Department of Public Works. Bruce supported and played a vital role in many successes, including serving as Superintendent of Facilities responsible for 25 City buildings totaling approximately 500,000 square feet. Bruce's ability to maintain the condition and quality of the City-owned buildings and facilities is second to none. He has been the primary contact for any issues related to City facilities and responded to many emergency calls at all times of the day and night. Bruce's attitude of service before self has made a lasting and positive impact on the City of Temecula and its employees, residents and businesses alike. We are grateful for Bruce's many contributions to our community and we wish him happiness and success in all his future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this twenty- second day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CONSENT Item No. 1 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 8, 2017 – 7:00 PM 6:00 PM - The City Council convened in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—PENDING LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to one matter of pending litigation: Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association v. City of Temecula, Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC1512880. At 6:00 PM Mayor Edwards called the City Council meeting to order and recessed to Closed Session to consider the matters described on the Closed Session agenda. The City Council meeting convened at 7:05 PM CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards Prelude Music: Ava Sarnowski Invocation: Pastor Dave Cope of Calvary Chapel Bible Fellowship Flag Salute: Council Member Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Rahn (absent), Stewart, Edwards PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Award from City of Temecula to Matt Wiechec Presentation from City of Temecula to Outgoing Police Chief Jeff Kubel PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals addressed the City Council: • Lee Mark • Mark Broderick CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Action Minutes 080817 1 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of July 25, 2017 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of July 25, 2017. 3 Approve the List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2017 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2017. 5 Approve the Purchase of Two BMW Police Motorcycles for the Temecula Police Department from Power Sports Unlimited dba: BMW Motorcycles of Escondido - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. Action Minutes 080817 2 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve the purchase of two BMW Police Motorcycles from Power Sports Unlimited dba: BMW Motorcycles of Escondido for a total amount of $61,337.36. 6 Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Quality Code Publishing for Municipal Code Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Quality Code Publishing for Municipal Code Services. 7 Ratify Standard Agreement with the State of California to Utilize the Services of the Office of Administrative Hearings - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council ratify the Standard Agreement with the State of California to utilize the services of the Office of Administrative Hearings. 8 Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Temecula Park and Ride, PW06-09 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE SOLICITATION OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE, PW06-09, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LA PAZ AND TEMECULA PARKWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) AND CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15332, CLASS 32 IN- FILL PROJECT Action Minutes 080817 3 9 Approve a Transfer of Funds and Award a Construction Contract to RJ Noble Company, Inc. for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Winchester Road, PW 10-13 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve a transfer of funds, in the amount of $300,000, from Measure S Funds appropriated in Fiscal Year 2017-18 Capital Improvement Program Budget for Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide; 9.2 Award a Construction Contract to RJ Noble Company, Inc., in the amount of $1,418,872.50, for Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Winchester Road (Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road), PW10-13; 9.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $141,887.25, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; 9.4 Make a finding that Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Winchester Road, PW10-13, is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 10 Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Citywide Sidewalk Project (Ynez Road between Pauba Road and Portraits Lane), PW15-12 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Accept the Improvements of the Citywide Sidewalk Project (Ynez Road between Pauba Road and Portraits Lane), PW15-12, as complete; 10.2 Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the Contract amount; 10.3 Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. 11 Approve the Agreement between City of Temecula and Redhawk Community Association for Sidewalk Maintenance for Portions of Redhawk Community - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Naggar, Stewart and Edwards with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Action Minutes 080817 4 RESOLUTION NO. 17-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF MEANDERING SIDEWALKS IN PORTIONS OF REDHAWK COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION COMMON AREAS WHERE SIDEWALKS MEANDER AROUND THE LEGAL BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN ASSOCIATION'S COMMON AREAS AND CITY'S RIGHT OF WAY; AND FINDING THE CITY'S ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA RECESS: At 7:37 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting and Temecula Public Financing Authority Meeting. At 7:40 PM, the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 15 Adopt the 2016 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program Nexus Study Update and Updated Fee Schedule - Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-1-1, Naggar abstained and Rahn absent); Motion by Comerchero, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Stewart and Edwards with Naggar abstained and Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 17-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, AND FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA 15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA Action Minutes 080817 5 BOARD/COMMISSION REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson stated there were no reportable actions under the Brown Act in regards to the Closed Session item. ADJOURNMENT At 8:02 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 22, 2017, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes 080817 6 Item No. 3 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Fiscal Services Manager Pam Espinoza, Accounting Tech I RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $7,290,947.40. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of August, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/27/2017 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 4,302,395.07 08/03/2017 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 2,528,613.56 07/27/2017 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 459,938.77 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/22/2017 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 7,290,947.40 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 987,024.42 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 95.80 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 597.80 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 12,410.15 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 4,159.98 170 MEASURE A FUND 471,366.25 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 241,739.56 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 131.46 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 817.89 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 15,277.33 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 3,950.12 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 1,425,665.33 300 INSURANCE FUND 18,151.26 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,278.98 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 76,531.65 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 34,650.00 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 11,332.02 340 FACILITIES 11,190.42 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,283,753.64 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 82,745.04 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,252.40 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 1,041.75 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 13,797.41 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,923.99 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 32,286.88 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 2,327.82 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 3,475.07 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 2,418.42 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 1,581.24 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 570.47 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 2,257.69 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 1,551.57 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 1,289.82 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 10,117.55 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 214.44 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 811.33 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 127.29 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 6,864.65 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 1,131.50 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 1,334.57 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 656.02 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 1,843.64 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 119.87 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 6,918.49 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 2,437.24 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 12,350.49 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 15,924.59 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 525.62 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 264.81 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 6,452.08 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 2,762.60 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 161.87 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 952.41 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 8,237.65 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 156.29 $ 6,831,008.63 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 257,412.67 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 408.47 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2,975.71 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 149,594.57 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 334.25 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 2,230.41 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 365.43 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,544.45 300 INSURANCE FUND 811.90 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,840.74 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 25,716.22 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 4,070.82 340 FACILITIES 10,919.27 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 18.94 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 45.09 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 31.40 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 5.16 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 57.74 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTR 7.00 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 9.23 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 226.19 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 1.92 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 9.62 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 2.93 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 122.68 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 26.18 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 8.39 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 7.14 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 30.74 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 0.80 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 113.89 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 60.86 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 172.20 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 279.28 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 3.84 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 7.30 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 157.15 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 50.52 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 1.34 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 7.30 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 246.25 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 2.78 459,938.77 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 7,290,947.40 apChkLst 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 3422 07/11/2017 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 010885 BIRCH AQUARIUM AT SCRIPPS INST 3428 07/11/2017 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 019953 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORP 019953 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORP 019321 VISIT TEMECULA VALLEY 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 006937 SOUTHWEST AI RLI NES 3433 07/17/2017 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020063 AMERICAN MOVIE CLASSICS 020063 AMERICAN MOVIE CLASSICS 014229 BOXFORLESS.COM 3434 07/27/2017 005460 U S BANK 3435 07/27/2017 005460 U S BANK 3436 07/27/2017 005460 U S BANK 3437 07/27/2017 005460 U S BANK 3438 07/25/2017 005460 U S BANK 3439 07/27/2017 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT 3440 07/27/2017 000194 I CMA RETIREMENT -PLAN 303355 3441 07/27/2017 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 3442 07/27/2017 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Description KH MPSC SENIOR EXCURSION ME ICSC RECON GLOBAL CONVENTION: 5/21-23 ME ICSC RECON GLOBAL CONVENTION: 5/21-23 ME REGISTRATION: STATE OF TOURSISM 6/15 ME REGISTRATION FOR CONFERENCE: ME AIRFARE: LEAGUE OF CA CITIES KH SUMMER DAY CAMP EXCURSION KH SUMMER DAY CAMP EXCURSION KH BUILD YOUR OWN BOAT REGATTA FFN 2002 RDA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS D/S PMT 2011 RDA TABS A D/S PMT 2006 RDA TABS A D/S PMT 2010 RDA TABS B D/S PMT ADMIN EXPENSE/FISCAL AGENT AGRMNT SUPPORT PAYMENT I CMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 PAYMENT STATE TAXES PAYMENT FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT Amount Paid Check Total 334.00 33.14 30.00 90.00 525.00 185.95 334.00 864.09 1,290.78 163.07 936.03 2,389.88 1,219,730.63 1,219,730.63 777,678.13 777,678.13 668,518.13 668,518.13 617,826.75 617,826.75 127,079.54 127,079.54 1,008.45 1,008.45 8,176.52 8,176.52 23,424.45 23,424.45 86,357.15 86,357.15 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 3443 07/27/2017 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 3444 07/27/2017 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT SOLUTION 3445 07/27/2017 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 3447 07/26/2017 020062 MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC. QE MARCH 2017 SALES TAX PHS 3448 07/27/2017 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 2ND QTR 2017 3449 07/27/2017 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 184110 07/27/2017 012881 4IMPRINT INC 184111 07/27/2017 020064 ACUNA, GINA Amount Paid Check Total 5,947.08 5,947.08 8,766.54 8,766.54 442.44 442.44 182,419.00 182,419.00 10,937.93 10,937.93 MISC SUPPLIES:VARIOUS EVENTS 102.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 8.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 4.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 1,313.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 311.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 7.34 MISC SUPPLIES:ADMIN 15.18 USE TAX: OFC FURNITURE:HISTORY MU -10.41 USE TAX: OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT -0.59 USE TAX: OFFICE FURNITURE: HISTORY -5.03 USE TAX: SUPPLIES: ARTS & CULTURE -25.99 USE TAX: OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT -0.71 USE TAX: OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT -0.40 USE TAX: OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT -0.61 USE TAX: OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT -105.70 SUPPLIES:SUMMER DAY CAMP 29.95 SUPPLIES:ARTS & CULTURE 2,825.33 SUPPLIES:SUMMER DAY CAMP 103.83 SUPPLIES:SUMMER DAY CAMP 18.32 MISC SUPPLIES:ADMIN 7.98 SUPPLIES:TVM 1,092.83 SUPPLIES:ARTS & CULTURE 78.57 S UPPLI ES:AQUATI CS 435.60 OFC FURNITURE:HISTORY MUSEUM 155.29 6,362.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT. 2,246.21 2,246.21 REFUND:WONDERS! SUPER CAMP 30.00 30.00 1850.207 184112 07/27/2017 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL JULY K-9 ON-SITE TRAINING: POLICE LLC DEPT 350.00 350.00 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 184113 07/27/2017 019075 ADORAMA INC MISCA/V SUPPLIES: PEG EQUIPMENT 77.39 MISCA/V SUPPLIES: PEG EQUIPMENT 18.41 95.80 184114 07/27/2017 001916 ALBERTA WEBB ASSOCIATES SPECIAL TAX ADMIN: FINANCE 17,926.58 P/E 6/30/17 SPECIAL TAX ADMIN: CFD 03 800.00 18,726.58 184115 07/27/2017 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT RENTALS:NIGHT OF THE LUMINARIES 398.94 USE TAX: RENTALS:NIGHT OF THE LUMI -32.10 366.84 184116 07/27/2017 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES JUL STAND BY FEE:POLICE 1,248.00 (AFN) DUI DRUG SCREENINGS: POLICE 127.14 PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA POLIC 845.22 2,220.36 184117 07/27/2017 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS TRAINING:AQUATICS PGRM 35.00 TRAINING:AQUATICS PGRM 406.00 WATER SAFETY INSTRUCTOR COURSE 175.00 616.00 184118 07/27/2017 017149 B G P RECREATION, INC. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,513.70 2,513.70 184119 07/27/2017 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO PERF:CULTURE QUEST 8/2 150.00 150.00 184120 07/27/2017 013482 BAS SECURITY 7/1-7/8 SECURITY SERVICES:TCSD 486.00 486.00 FACI LITI E 184121 07/27/2017 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES JUN DUI & DRUG TESTING:PD 1,124.80 JUN DUI & DRUG TESTING:PD 545.00 JUN DUI & DRUG TESTING:PD 3,746.94 5,416.74 184122 07/27/2017 018607 BLUELINE RENTAL LLC rental items:various events 1,549.50 1,549.50 184123 07/27/2017 008605 BONTERRA PSOMAS 4/28-6/01 CNSLT SVCS:PECHANGA 688.75 PKWY ENV 10/28-11/24 CNSLT SVCS:PECHANGA PK 32.50 721.25 184124 07/27/2017 010469 BOZONELOS, ROBERT PERF: ART OFF THE WALLS 7/7/17 400.00 400.00 184125 07/27/2017 004241 CALIF DEPT OF STATE CASP PROGRAM CERT: LANKENAU, 500.00 500.00 ARCHITECT STEVE 184126 07/27/2017 004241 CALIF DEPT OF STATE GASP PROGRAM CERT: CLEMENTS, 500.00 500.00 ARCHITECT BRIAN 184127 07/27/2017 007146 CALIFORNIA SENSOR CORP CALSENSE COMM HUB DATA PLAN: 3,000.00 3,000.00 PW 184128 07/27/2017 001610 CALTRANS MATLS: SUPPLIES: FVP INTERCHANGE 5,176.87 5,176.87 PW07-04 Page :3 apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 184129 07/27/2017 004462 CDW, LLC MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO 931.70 TECH USE TAX: MISC SUPPLIES & EQUIP: I NFC -1.99 MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO TECF 267.55 MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO TECF 108.30 MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO TECF 217.74 1,523.30 184130 07/27/2017 009640 CERTIFION CORPORATION JUL ONLINE DATABASE 150.00 150.00 SUBSCRIPTION: POLICE 184131 07/27/2017 000137 CHEVRON AND TEXACO JUN 17 CITY VEHICLES FUEL: POLICE 1,448.31 1,448.31 DEPT 184132 07/27/2017 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 24.00 24.00 CHARITIES, C/O WELLS FARGO PAYMENT BANK 184133 07/27/2017 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY & 1,153.29 1,153.29 DIST. CRC 184134 07/27/2017 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 PRGRM SUPPLIES: WORKFORCE DEV YOUTH 184135 07/27/2017 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 SUPPLIES:CULTURALARTS EVENTS 184136 07/27/2017 017542 COX, KRISTI LYN 184137 07/27/2017 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS INSTALLATION WORK: FIRE STATION 84 REPAIR: BAY DOOR: FIRE STATION 92 REPAIRS ON SECTIONAL BAY DOOR: FIF EMERG MAINT SRVC: HARVESTON BLD( EMERG PLUMBING SRVCS: SAM HICKS I EMERG PLUMBING SRVCS: CONCESSIC REPAIRS: FIRE STATION 92 HVAC REPAIR: MRC EMERG MAINT SRVC: WINCHESTER CRE INSTALL SOUND SYSTEM AC: OLD TOW CONCRETE SLAB REPAIRS:CRC: TES PC EMERGENCY HVAC REHAB: HISTORY MI PLUMBING SVCS: VARIOUS PARKS PLUMBING: CLEAN ICE MACHINE: PBSP PLUMBING SVCS: FREEZER REPAIR: PB HVAC REPAIR: PARKING GARAGE OFC HVAC REPAIR: JRC 148.83 299.08 369.60 537.60 392.00 336.00 436.80 1,492.15 1,599.42 3,185.25 828.95 185.00 248.00 308.00 740.00 495.00 652.00 880.00 6,312.00 340.00 150.00 150.00 130.00 220.00 148.83 299.08 2,072.00 17,915.77 Page4 apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 184138 07/27/2017 018491 CRONBERG PHOTOGRAPHY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 490.00 490.00 184139 07/27/2017 005291 DEGANGE, JOHN ESRI USER CONF '17: 7/10-7/13/17 117.83 117.83 184140 07/27/2017 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 200.68 LUBRICANTS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF 221.19 421.87 184141 07/27/2017 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUN WATER METER:MURR HOT 32.25 DIST SPRINGS RD JUNE WATER METER:39656 DIEGO DR 222.98 184142 07/27/2017 011202 EMH SPORTS USA, INC 184143 07/27/2017 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. JUNE WATER METER:MURR HOT SPRINT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 153.80 409.03 598.50 1,176.00 1,960.00 3,734.50 LANDSCAPE IMPR: STA 84 1,630.00 irrig repairs:winchester crk:var slopes 485.29 2,115.29 184144 07/27/2017 017736 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAFE, LLC FOOD:ART OFF THE WALLS EVENTS 485.67 485.67 7/31 184145 07/27/2017 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 453.03 453.03 184146 07/27/2017 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 150.00 150.00 184147 07/27/2017 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA, INC. JUL INTERNET SVCS:27415 102.84 ENTERPRISE CIR JUL INTERNET SVCS:LIBRARY 186.98 JUL INTERNET SVCS:SENIOR CENTER 146.98 JUL INTERNET SVCS:41000 MAIN ST 2,472.56 JUL INTERNET SVCS:41000 MAIN ST 4,760.55 7,669.91 184148 07/27/2017 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS Sound/Lighting & Misc Supplies: Theater 2,263.41 2,263.41 184149 07/27/2017 013076 GAUDET, YVONNE M. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 864.50 864.50 184150 07/27/2017 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE EQUIPMENT: TVE2 106.58 106.58 INC 184151 07/27/2017 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC STTLMNT:CLASSICS...MERC JUL '17 765.10 765.10 SOCIETY 184152 07/27/2017 015534 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, USER LIC. NEOGOV RENEWAL: 7/1/17- 11,000.00 11,000.00 INC. 6/30/ Pages apChkLst 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184153 07/27/2017 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL SVCS 184154 07/27/2017 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 184155 07/27/2017 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS 184156 07/27/2017 015358 KELLY PAPER COMPANY, INC. 184157 07/27/2017 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. 184158 07/27/2017 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & WHITMORE 184159 07/27/2017 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC 184160 07/27/2017 002634 LITELINES INC 184161 07/27/2017 020065 LIVERSAGE, SANDRA 184162 07/27/2017 011145 LODATO, JILL CHRISTINE 184163 07/27/2017 011956 MATTHEWS, AARON 184164 07/27/2017 013827 MIKO MOUNTAINLION, INC. 184165 07/27/2017 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN ANN 184166 07/27/2017 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC Description Lease for 16 copiers:City Hall/off-site JUL LEASE FOR 6 COPIERS:LIBRARY JUN HARDWARE SUPPLIES: AQUATICS JUN COPIER MAI NT/R E PAI R/USAG E: CI TY WI D E JUN COPIER MAINT/REPAIR/USAGE:CITI PAPER/BINDING/PCKG SUPP:CENTRAL SVCS PAPER/BINDING/PCKG SUPP:CENTRAL CREDIT: PAPER PCKG SUPP:CENTRAL 5 CREDIT: PAPER PCKG SUPP:CENTRAL 5 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MEMB. RENEWAL: 7/1/17 - 6/30/18 MISC SUPPLIES:AQUATICS PGRM BANNER ASSEMBLY: ECON DEV REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ESRI USER CONF '17: 7/11-7/13/17 REMOVE SAND:SILT: VALLEJO CHANNEL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REPLACE WIND SCREENS: MARGARITA TENNIS INSTALL SCREENS: HARV COMM PARK F INSTALL VINYL FENCE: BIRDSALL SPQR' INSTALL GATE & FENCE: HARV LAKE PAI Amount Paid Check Total 523.70 793.89 928.10 6,202.60 784.83 890.77 436.36 -884.52 -6.25 885.50 1,305.50 798.00 895.50 1,496.63 3,719.25 200.00 3,118.50 1,801.80 250.35 16,900.00 315.00 3,333.11 22,105.27 5,308.24 5,541.32 184167 07/27/2017 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY J. ART FESTIVAL WORKSHOP 2,500.00 1,317.59 928.10 6,987.43 436.36 2,989.00 895.50 1,496.63 3,719.25 200.00 4,920.30 250.35 16,900.00 315.00 36,287.94 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,450.00 4,950.00 Pages apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 184168 07/27/2017 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS BUSINESS CARDS, SUPPLIES:MEDICS DIV 184169 07/27/2017 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 184170 07/27/2017 011549 POWER SPORTS UNLIMITED CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW CIP CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS F CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW STREET CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW LAND DE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS F CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS F CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS F Amount Paid Check Total 282.71 282.71 592.65 602.28 1,369.53 817.14 2,448.00 290.00 211.49 VEHICLE MAI NT& REPAIR:POLICE 764.98 USE TAX/VEH MAINT & REPAIR:POLICE -5.77 VEHICLE MAI NT& REPAIR:POLICE 906.97 6,331.09 1,666.18 184171 07/27/2017 019015 PROJECT RADIAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,260.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,596.00 2,856.00 184172 07/27/2017 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL JUN UNIFORM/FLR MTS/TWL 830.51 830.51 SUPPLY RENTALS:CITY FAC 184173 07/27/2017 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC JUN CONSULTANT SRVCS:MARG.COMMUNITY CNTR 184174 07/27/2017 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 184175 07/27/2017 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR WASH 184176 07/27/2017 017124 RAYA, SERGIO 184177 07/27/2017 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL 8,280.50 8,280.50 JUN VAR WATER METER:CALLE 92.28 ELENITA JUN VAR WATER METERS:41951 MORAG 702.85 JUN VAR WATER METERS:PWYMCA 360.86 JUN VAR WATER METERS:TCSD SVC LE 26,117.06 27,273.05 MAY VEHICLE DETAILING SRVCS:PW 17.99 NPDES MAY VEH DETAILING SRVCS:POLICE/FIR 71.96 MAR VEH DETAILING SRVCS:POLICE/FIF 71.96 161.91 COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM 1,553.39 1,553.39 CLEANUP SRVCS: 4TH OF JULY 2,950.00 2,950.00 MANAGEMENT PARADE 184178 07/27/2017 016281 RIVERSIDE CO EXPLORERS EXPLORERACAD. 7/23-28 825.00 825.00 A.S./A.G./G.B. 184179 07/27/2017 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 2017 JULY 4TH EXTRAVAGANZA 15,979.05 15,979.05 DEPT PATROL SRVCS 184180 07/27/2017 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 5/1-6/30/17 EXTRA DUTY:YOUTH DEPT COURT 416.31 416.31 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 184181 07/27/2017 000220 ROBINSON PRINTING & PRINTING SERVICE: ECON DEV CREATIVE 184182 07/27/2017 008739 ROSE CITY LABEL Amount Paid Check Total 1,672.58 1,672.58 PROMOTIONAL ITEMS:FIRE PREV 631.35 USE TAX/PROMOTIONAL ITEMS:FIRE PR 184183 07/27/2017 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC CRAFT SUPPLIES:SUMMER DAY CAMP -49.35 582.00 13.34 13.34 184184 07/27/2017 009196 SACRAMENTO THEATRICAL SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES:THEATER 384.26 LIGHTING SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES:THEATER 5,979.72 6,363.98 184185 07/27/2017 004274 SAFE & SECURE LOCKSMITH LOCKSMITH SRVCS:HARVESTON 49.51 PARK LOCKSMITH SRVCS:HARVESTON PARK 32.63 USE TAX/LOCKSMITH SRVCS:HARVESTC -0.27 LOCKSMITH SRVCS:HARVESTON LAKE 69.97 LOCKSMITH SRVCS:HARVESTON PARK 150.00 301.84 184186 07/27/2017 019845 SALUS EVENT GROUP REFUND:SEC DEP:PICNIC 200.00 200.00 RENTAL:HARVESTON 184187 07/27/2017 020066 SANTOS, KRISTINE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 184188 07/27/2017 017699 SARNOWSKI, SHAWNA, M PHOTOGRAPHY:THEATER 4,000.00 4,000.00 PRESTON 184189 07/27/2017 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 437.50 437.50 184190 07/27/2017 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 7/20/17 560.00 560.00 184191 07/27/2017 009013 SISQUOC, LORENE A PERFORMANCE:TVM CULTURE QUEST 200.00 200.00 7/31 184192 07/27/2017 015674 SJ LINKING SYSTEMS RADIO RENTALS:4TH OF JULY PARADE 800.00 800.00 184193 07/27/2017 000645 SMART & FINAL INC SUPPLIES & MISC ITEMS:HUMAN SRVCS SUPPLIES & MISC ITEMS:MPSC SUPPLIES & MISC ITEMS:HUMAN SRVCE 339.15 119.12 286.14 744.41 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184194 07/27/2017 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 184195 07/27/2017 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 184196 07/27/2017 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC Description JUN 2-00-397-5059:33340 CAMINO PIEDRA JUN 2-26-887-0789:40233 VILLAGE RD JUN 2-29-223-9571:30395 MURR HOT SPf JUN 2-27-560-0625:32380 DEERHOLLOW JUN 2-30-608-9384:28582 HARVESTON D JUN 2-31-419-2659:26706 YNEZ RD TC1 JUN 2-31-693-9784:26036 YNEZ RD TC1 JUN 2-29-974-7568:26953 YNEZ RD TC1 JUN 2-33-237-4818:30499 RANCHO CAL JUN 2-28-171-2620:40820 WINCHESTER I Amount Paid Check Total 6,667.61 1,935.70 52.00 1,816.37 497.86 136.09 346.35 103.56 100.38 1,025.61 JUN 055-475-6169-5:32380 152.56 DEERHOLLOW WAY JUN 015-575-0195-2:32211 WOLF VLY RD 64.80 PEST CONTROL SRVCS: MARG. 49.00 SPLASH PARK PEST CONTROL SRVCS: T.E.S. 59.00 PEST CONTROL SRVCS: SAM HICKS PAF 94.00 PEST CONTROL SRVCS: SANTIAGO VER 94.00 184197 07/27/2017 019250 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC APR TRAFFIC SGNL MAINT SRVCS: PW TRAFFIC 184198 07/27/2017 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC 184199 07/27/2017 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 184200 07/27/2017 015648 STEIN, ANDREW REFRESHMENTS:WORKFORCE DEV PRGMS REFRESHMENTS:YOUTH PRGM 6/23 REFRESHMENTS:YOUTH PRGMS OFFICE SUPPLIES:CONTRACTED CLASSES OFFICE SUPPLIES:THEATER OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW TRAFFIC/NPDES OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW CI OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW CI OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW TRAFFIC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW CIP/TRAFFIC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW CI USE TAX/T-SHIRTS:CULTURE QUEST PRGM T-SHIRTS:TMV CULTURE QUEST PRGM MISC SUPPLIES:SPECIAL EVENT PRGM: USE TAX/SUPPLIES:SPECIAL EVENT PR( 12,681.53 217.36 296.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 137.36 74.32 393.93 605.61 76.98 26.82 37.14 9.27 215.15 129.40 27.82 68.51 19.89 608.48 36.95 -5.11 587.80 2,050.00 949.15 1,256.41 3,581.84 184201 07/27/2017 009452 STRAWN, WILLIAM R. REIMB:SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY 103.69 103.69 THEATER Page9 apChkLst 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184202 07/27/2017 012789 STUART, JENNIFER SARAH 184203 07/27/2017 015088 TANKO STREETLIGHTING, INC. 184204 07/27/2017 010679 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR/RADIATOR 184205 07/27/2017 008311 TEMECULA VALLEY ATHLETIC CLUB 184206 07/27/2017 006884 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER 184207 07/27/2017 010046 TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION & 184208 07/27/2017 020067 TEMECULA VALLEY H & I 184209 07/27/2017 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON COMPANY 184210 07/27/2017 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 184211 07/27/2017 019100 TNT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC 184212 07/27/2017 017565 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT INC. 184213 07/27/2017 019464 TRIAD CONSULTING & SYSTEM 184214 07/27/2017 000161 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 184215 07/27/2017 015006 UNION BANK, N.A. 184216 07/27/2017 008977 VALLEY EVENTS, INC. Description TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS STREET LIGHT MAI NT EQUIPMENT:PW USE TAX/STREET LIGHT MAI NT EQUIP:P VEHICLE MAI NT& REPAIR:TCSD TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS FY 17/18 1ST QTR OPERATING AGRMNT:ECODEV MAY 2017 BID ADMIN FEE MAY 2017 BUS. IMPRV DISTRICTASMNT REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS USE TAX/PLUMBING SUPPLIES:PW PARK JUL HIGH SPEED INTERNET:29119 MARGARITA JUL HIGH SPEED INTERNET:32364 OVEF JUL HIGH SPEED INTERNET:32211 WOLF DY & SOUND SRVCS:CONCERT SERIES 7/20 DY & SOUND SRVCS:MOVIES IN PARK 7/ REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC CONES: PW STREETS MAY PROJECT MANAG SRVCS:SURVEILLANCE SYS JUN PROJECT MANAG SRVCS:SURVEILi FY 17/18 ENERGOV ASSIST:I NFO TECH CUSTOM REPORTING:INFO TECH CUSTOM REPORTING:INFO TECH FV PKWY ENVIRON. MITIGATION ESCROW FEE RENTALS:4TH OF JULY PARADE Amount Paid Check Total 2,943.15 1,522.50 -10.50 377.32 700.00 1,575.00 33, 750.00 -2,984.89 149,244.29 200.00 45.42 -0.41 348.13 54.99 180.65 787.00 1,400.00 5,004.42 13,030.00 12,675.00 23,000.00 250.00 1,000.00 1,590.00 1,310.65 2,943.15 1,512.00 377.32 2,275.00 33, 750.00 146,259.40 200.00 45.01 583.77 2,187.00 5,004.42 25,705.00 24,250.00 1,590.00 1,310.65 184217 07/27/2017 014850 VALLEY PRINTING SERVICES, PRINTING SRVCS:CITY NEWSLETTER 4,966.43 4,966.43 INC. Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 184218 07/27/2017 018995 VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,890.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 945.00 2,835.00 184219 07/27/2017 020052 VORDAHL, ANDREW REIMB: SR GOLDEN YEARS EVENT 65.24 65.24 SUPPLIES 184220 07/27/2017 007987 WALMART SUPPLIES:TVM SUMMER CAMP 184221 07/27/2017 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 6/1-15/17 TREE MAI NT SRVCS: VAIL RANCH 148.87 148.87 6,177.00 6,177.00 184222 07/27/2017 007949 WESTERN ARTS ALLIANCE ANN'L MBRSHIP 450.00 450.00 1001728 07/17/2017 020053 BRIDGES, RUSSELL 1001729 07/17/2017 020053 BRIDGES, RUSSELL 1001730 07/17/2017 016757 DAVIS, KRISTEN 1001731 07/17/2017 018770 ENGLISH, LISA DUES:THEATER/B.BARNETT REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0405.204 196.00 196.00 REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0405.204 20.00 20.00 REFUND:LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS 108.00 108.00 5102.323 REFUND:COMPLETE TENNIS CAMP 92.00 92.00 1001732 07/17/2017 020054 GAJDA, MARK REFUND:BAKERY BOOT CAMP FOR 79.20 79.20 KIDS 1001733 07/17/2017 020055 GARIBALDI, CHRISTINA REFUND:BEGINNING TODDLER SWIM 45.00 45.00 LESSONS 1001734 07/17/2017 020055 GARIBALDI, CHRISTINA REFUND:BEGINNING TODDLER SWIM 10.00 10.00 LESSONS 1001735 07/17/2017 020056 HEI LI NG, MARIA REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP0405.204 40.00 40.00 1001736 07/17/2017 020056 HEI LI NG, MARIA REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP0405.204 376.00 376.00 1001737 07/17/2017 020057 KIM, MEYEON 1001738 07/17/2017 020057 KIM, MEYEON 1001739 07/17/2017 020057 KIM, MEYEON REFUND:BIGFOOT'S ALL -DAY ART 332.00 332.00 CAMP REFUND:BIGFOOT'S ALL -DAY ART 388.00 388.00 CAMP REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0400.204 192.00 192.00 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 12 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 1001740 07/17/2017 020057 KIM, MEYEON 1001741 07/17/2017 020057 KIM, MEYEON 1001742 07/17/2017 020058 PELAYO, CESAR 1001743 07/17/2017 020059 SEMMO, ELIZABETH 1001744 07/17/2017 020060 SOLTYSINSKI, ADAM 1001745 07/17/2017 020061 WONG, STELLA Description Amount Paid Check Total REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0400.204 188.00 188.00 REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0400.204 20.00 20.00 REFUND:CREDIT:PICNIC 45.00 45.00 SHELTER:PALA PARK REFUND:CREDIT:PICNIC 60.00 60.00 RENTAL:RRSP REFUND:LEVEL 2 SWM LESSONS 45.00 45.00 5102.311 REFUND:GEARS 2 ROBOTS 2655.201 96.00 96.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 4,302,395.07 Page:12 apChkLst 07/27/2017 9:20:47AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 149 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 4,302,395.07 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 3450 08/03/2017 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 146.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT. 22.84 USE TAX: OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT -1.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT. -3.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT. 42.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT. 94.60 USE TAX OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT. -6.17 YOUTH PROGRAM SUPPLIES: ECO DEV 52.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT. -17.97 329.58 184223 08/03/2017 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL TRAINING & EQUIPMENT:POLICE K-9 303.41 LLC UNIT USE TAX: TRAINING & EQUIPMENT: K-9 l -2.79 300.62 184224 08/03/2017 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, DEBIT MEMO: ADDING 1 MEMBER FOR 4.40 LLC AUGUST AUG EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM 629.20 633.60 184225 08/03/2017 001916 ALBERTAWEBBASSOCIATES CONSULT SVCS: WEED ABATEMENT 636.75 636.75 RESEARCH 184226 08/03/2017 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT JUN PAVEMENT REHAB OF MARGARITA RD RET: JUN PAVEMENT REHAB OF MARGA ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT DIV USE TAX: ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET P ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT DIV USE TAX: ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET P ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT DIV USE TAX ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET N ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT DIV USE TAX ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET N 128,626.48 -6,431.32 3,247.22 -29.86 1,931.78 -17.76 1,305.00 -12.00 1,030.95 -9.48 129,641.01 184227 08/03/2017 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES PIANO TUNING & MAINT: THEATER 1,984.00 PIANO TUNING & MAINT: THEATER 417.50 2,401.50 184228 08/03/2017 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT RENTALS: 4TH OF JULY PARADE 1,599.40 1,599.40 184229 08/03/2017 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES AUG STAND BY FEE:POLICE 1,248.00 1,248.00 (AFN) 184230 08/03/2017 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO JUL WATER SRVCS: POLICE 28.28 28.28 STOREFRONT 184231 08/03/2017 018941 AZTEC LANDSCAPING, INC. JUN: ADD'L RESTROOM SVC FOR 774.74 774.74 PARKS 184232 08/03/2017 017149 B G P RECREATION, INC. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,764.00 1,764.00 Pagel apChkLst 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184233 08/03/2017 018101 BARN STAGE COMPANY INC, THE 184234 08/03/2017 013482 BAS SECURITY 184235 08/03/2017 014293 BIBLIOTHECA ITG, LLC 184236 08/03/2017 014284 BLAKELY'S TRUCK SERVICE 184237 08/03/2017 003138 CAL MAT 184238 08/03/2017 013265 CALIF BUILDING 184239 08/03/2017 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVATION 184240 08/03/2017 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE-ACCTING 184241 08/03/2017 004566 CALIF DEPT -TOXIC SUB CONTROL 184242 08/03/2017 000502 CALIF MUNI STATISTICS 184243 08/03/2017 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 184244 08/03/2017 018828 CASC ENGINEERING AND 184245 08/03/2017 012353 CONSTRUCTION TESTING 184246 08/03/2017 013379 COSSOU, CELINE Description STTLMNT: CABARET...MERC 07/30/17 SECURITY SVCS: 7/13 - 7/22 BIN SORTER ANNUAL SUPPORT& MAINT:LIBRAR EQUIPMENT REPAIR:PARKS EQUIPMENT REPAIR:PARKS ASPHALT PURCH:PW STREET MAINT ASPHALT PURCH:PW STREET MAINT ASPHALT PURCH:PW STREET MAINT 2ND QTR PAYMENT OF SB1473 2017 2ND QTR PAYMENT OF SB1473 2017 2017 2ND QTR PMT:STRONG MOTION (APR -JUN) 2017 2ND QTR PMT:STRONG MOTION (A JUN FINGERPRINTING SVCS: VAR DEPTS EPA ID VERIFICATION & HAZ WASTE MANIFEST DIRECT & OVERLAP DEBT STATEMENT 6/30/17 REGISTRATION: LUDWIG, PERRY 11/7-11/9 1/9-6/30/18 PERMIT COMPLIANCE SRVCS 1/9-6/30/18 PERMIT COMPLIANCE SRVC: JUN INSP SVCS FOR MARGARITA RD GEOTECH ENG SVCS: PLANNING GEOTECH ENG SVCS: PLANNING TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 184247 08/03/2017 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 EVENT SUPPLIES: TVE2 Amount Paid Check Total 861.00 729.00 10,647.84 91.45 194.34 90.01 172.93 164.49 1,127.00 -113.00 -167.78 3,355.68 4,990.00 1,015.00 1,000.00 765.00 29, 373.10 1,569.89 13,432.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 560.00 1,260.00 1,470.00 1,400.00 861.00 729.00 10,647.84 285.79 427.43 1,014.00 3,187.90 4,990.00 1,015.00 1,000.00 765.00 30,942.99 16,432.00 4,690.00 12.90 12.90 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184248 08/03/2017 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 Description Amount Paid Check Total SUPPLIES:CULTURALARTS EVENTS 193.05 SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES 530.71 723.76 184249 08/03/2017 004524 CRAFCO INC -ABSOLUTE ASPHALT PRODUCTS: PW STREET 7,047.00 7,047.00 ASPHALT MAI NT 184250 08/03/2017 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. JUN PARKING CITATION PROCESSING:POLICE 184251 08/03/2017 012600 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES JUN DSGN SVCS FOR FALLEN INC HEROES 184252 08/03/2017 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL PORTABLE RESTROOMS: 6TH ST SRVCS PARKING LOT 1,093.69 1,093.69 2,505.00 2,505.00 20.88 20.88 184253 08/03/2017 020085 DINGWALL, EMILY REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 304.00 304.00 184254 08/03/2017 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL& LUBRICANTS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEPT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEP' FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPEE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPEE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC DIV FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC DIV 109.31 91.18 425.28 642.84 1,093.71 414.85 821.18 123.09 113.25 237.67 192.66 102.76 59.57 122.45 218.31 4,768.11 184255 08/03/2017 020086 DREW, PATRICIA REFUND:SEC DEP:PICNIC 150.00 150.00 RENTAL:HARVESTON 184256 08/03/2017 019728 DREYFUSS, ELIZABETH STTLMNT: LOVE LETTERS 7/29/27 660.00 660.00 184257 08/03/2017 004799 E C S IMAGING INC additional repository for LF:city clerk 1,200.00 1,200.00 184258 08/03/2017 019293 E&F PET SUPPLIES, INC. k-9 food & supplies: tem police 159.97 159.97 184259 08/03/2017 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUN WATER METER:39569 SERAPHINA 635.18 635.18 DIST RD Page :3 apChkLst 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184260 08/03/2017 004068 ECALDRE MANALILI-DE VILLA, AILEEN 184261 08/03/2017 008704 EDWARDS, MARYANN 184262 08/03/2017 016839 EHS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 184263 08/03/2017 019681 EJK CORPORATION 184264 08/03/2017 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY LLC 184265 08/03/2017 011202 EMH SPORTS USA, INC 184266 08/03/2017 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC. 184267 08/03/2017 000164 ESGILCORPORATION 184268 08/03/2017 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. 184269 08/03/2017 017736 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAFE, LLC 184270 08/03/2017 017736 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAFE, LLC 184271 08/03/2017 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 184272 08/03/2017 000380 FIRST STUDENT CHARTER 184273 08/03/2017 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA, INC. Description TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REIMB:ICSC RECON CONF 5/21-23 CONSULT FEE: HOMELESS EMCAMPMENT PET WASTE BAGS: VARIOUS PARKS JUL STATE LOBBYING SVCS: CM AUG STATE LOBBYING SVCS: CM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS JUN SEIR FOR PROPOSED: TRUAX HOTEL MAY PLAN CHECK SVCS:COM DEV DEPT JUL LDSCP MAI NT SVCS: LVL C SLOPES JUL LDSCP MAI NT SRVCS: LEVEL C SLO IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS MEDIAN IRRIGATION REPAIRS:VAR PARKS:MEDI/ JUL LNDSCP MAINT SRVCS: VAR FACILI1 FOOD:ART OFF THE WALLS EVENTS FOOD:ART OFF THE WALLS EVENTS 7/5-7/6 EXP MAIL SVCS: PLAN/CM/CLERK 7/5-7/13 EXP MAIL SVCS: TCSD TRANSPORTATION:SUMMER DAY CAMP JUL INTERNET SVCS:THEATER 184274 08/03/2017 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS Sound/Lighting & Misc Supplies: Theater Amount Paid Check Total 192.50 286.76 1,050.00 1,386.56 3,500.00 3,500.00 357.00 966.93 518.00 1,568.00 1,848.00 4,820.00 25, 724.01 23,074.18 36,314.91 927.98 2,111.31 11,340.40 582.80 412.71 53.40 100.93 521.30 146.98 192.50 286.76 1,050.00 1,386.56 7,000.00 5,257.93 4,820.00 25, 724.01 73,768.78 582.80 412.71 154.33 521.30 146.98 1,528.55 1,528.55 Page4 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184275 08/03/2017 001937 GALLS, LLC Description equip: police volunteers equip: police volunteers equip: police volunteers Amount Paid Check Total 38.48 76.95 62.45 177.88 184276 08/03/2017 020087 GIORGIANNI, KARENA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 149.45 149.45 184277 08/03/2017 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS INC Office supplies: Bldg & Safety 29.31 Office supplies: Bldg & Safety Office Supplies: Planning Office supplies: Bldg & Safety 35.58 142.25 105.06 184278 08/03/2017 019719 GOLDFIELD STAGE COMPANY, TRANSPORTATION:SUMMER DAY 587.94 MCCLINTOCK ENTERPRISE CAMP INC 312.20 TRANSPORTATION:SUMMER DAY CAMP 3,323.13 3,911.07 184279 08/03/2017 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL JUL LEASE FOR COPIERS: VARIOUS 1,351.02 SVCS LOCATIONS JUL LEASE FOR COPIERS: VAR LOCATIC 291.45 1,642.47 184280 08/03/2017 020088 GREENE, SUSIE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 184281 08/03/2017 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS SPORTS EQUIPMENT SPORTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 154.24 37.24 14.67 114.42 44.99 11.30 64.01 26.09 118.93 32.53 4.71 25.97 10.66 158.76 299.06 118.27 6.51 35.00 425.69 51.10 11.94 36.95 22.80 50.54 1,876.38 Pages apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 184282 08/03/2017 012129 HAVENS FOR THE ARTS STTLMNT: A MIDSUMMER NIGHTS DREAM 184283 08/03/2017 020019 HAWK ANALYTICS, INC. MAPPING &ANALYSIS SFTWR: CELL PHONE 184284 08/03/2017 000520 HDL COREN & CONE INC PROPERTY TAX RATE ANALYSIS Amount Paid Check Total 12,518.09 12,518.09 2,495.00 2,495.00 600.00 600.00 184285 08/03/2017 013749 HELIXSTORM INC. FIREWALL UPGRADE & MIGRATION 34,650.00 IT INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT:INFO TE 1,800.00 184286 08/03/2017 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE MAINT SUPPLIES: VARIOUS 2,766.88 FACILITIES 184287 08/03/2017 004119 J T B SUPPLY COMPANY INC TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT: PW TRAFFIC 184288 08/03/2017 019936 JOHNSON, JEANETTE PERF: CULTURE QUEST CAMP 36,450.00 2,766.88 1,173.40 1,173.40 30.00 30.00 184289 08/03/2017 001091 KEYSER MARSTON APR FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS: 6,471.25 ASSOCIATES INC CYPRESS RIDG JUN CNSLTNT SRVCS:UPTOWN TEMECL 1,985.00 APR PROPOSED ALTAIR SP FISCAL IMP 1,445.00 184290 08/03/2017 017118 KRACH, BREE B. NAME PLATES: HUMAN RESOURCES 43.50 184291 08/03/2017 017946 LANDRUM, KAREN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 9,901.25 43.50 1,050.00 1,050.00 184292 08/03/2017 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 571.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,137.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 145.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 386.40 184293 08/03/2017 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & JUN HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00013 770.00 WHITMORE 2,240.70 JUN HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00014 325.00 JUN HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 35.00 1,130.00 184294 08/03/2017 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC MISC SUPPLIES:AQUATICS PGRM 2,612.72 2,612.72 184295 08/03/2017 004998 LINFIELD SCHOOL REFUND:TUPAPPL. 270.00 270.00 WITHDRAWN:PA17-0914 184296 08/03/2017 002634 LITELI NES INC LIGHT POLE ASSEMBLIES: OLD TOWN 6,300.98 6,300.98 Pages apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 184297 08/03/2017 015733 LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF CALIBRATION SRVCS: TEMECULA POLICE 184298 08/03/2017 004813 M & J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC INFLATABLE RENTALS: 4TH OF JULY EVENT 184299 08/03/2017 013982 MCI COMM SERVICE Amount Paid Check Total 100.00 100.00 2,483.00 2,483.00 JUL XXX -0346 GENERAL USAGE 33.12 JUL XXX -0714 GEN USAGE:PD MALL ALA 34.78 67.90 184300 08/03/2017 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS RESTROOM SIGNS: THEATER 189.00 189.00 184301 08/03/2017 017427 MATCHETT, VIVIAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 436.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 184302 08/03/2017 020090 MCCABE'S NURSERY & REFUND:CREDIT & SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 184303 08/03/2017 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES, INC. JUN CDBG ADMIN SVCS 184304 08/03/2017 018314 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC. 12/1-5/31 CEQA STUDIES: GENETIONS MND 400.40 837.20 502.75 502.75 10,155.00 10,155.00 1,652.00 1,652.00 184305 08/03/2017 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING WELDING SRVCS: OLD TOWN 360.00 INC. REPAIR SRVCS:OLD TOWN STREET LIG[ 650.00 1,010.00 184306 08/03/2017 012962 MILLER, MISTY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 168.00 184307 08/03/2017 012264 MIRANDA, JULIO C. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 184308 08/03/2017 016445 MKB PRINTING & Business cards: Bldg & Safety Dept PROMOTIONAL INC 184309 08/03/2017 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC INSTALL ORNAMENTAL FENCE: HARV LAKE 184310 08/03/2017 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY J. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 196.00 364.00 758.10 535.50 157.50 1,451.10 96.55 96.55 7,352.62 7,352.62 1,960.00 808.50 63.00 184311 08/03/2017 001986 MUZAK LLC AUG DISH NETWORK PROGRAM:41952 65.11 6TH ST AUG DISH NETWORK PROGRAMING:FO( 151.27 184312 08/03/2017 001323 NESTLE WATERS NORTH 6/17-7/16 DRINKING WATER: AQUATICS 62.97 AMERICA 2,831.50 216.38 62.97 Page:7 apChkLst 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184313 08/03/2017 014391 NICHOLS, KELLIE D. 184314 08/03/2017 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS DIV 184315 08/03/2017 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE 184316 08/03/2017 019851 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES, INC. 184317 08/03/2017 012948 PAVEMENT COATINGS COMPANY 184318 08/03/2017 020101 PEARDON, KENNETH 184319 08/03/2017 020100 PECK, CARYL 184320 08/03/2017 020081 PERMITTECHNATION -2017 WEBINAR 184321 08/03/2017 000249 PETTY CASH 184322 08/03/2017 019015 PROJECT RADIAN 184323 08/03/2017 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY 184324 08/03/2017 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 184325 08/03/2017 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR WASH 184326 08/03/2017 009781 RHODES, ESTHER 184327 08/03/2017 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON Description TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS MAINT CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW CIP CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW STREET PRGS PMT #2:I-15 RAMP SYS/ULT. INTRCHG JUN SRVCS:CITYWIDE ARTERIAL STREETS SLUR RET W/H JUN PMT:ARTERIAL STRS SLUF REFUND:PARKING CITE 314453 REFUND:PARKING CITE 321556 PERMIT TECH CERT EXAM TRNG 8/15, 22 K.P. PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BACKHOE & TRACTOR REPAIRS:PW STREET MNTC JUL VAR WATER METERS:FIRE STNS JUL VAR WATER METERS:30875 RANCH( JUL VAR WATER METERS:PWVAR SITES JUL VAR WATER METERS:TCSD SVC LE\ JUN CITY VEHICLE DETAILING SRVCS:VAR.DPT REFUND:SENIOR EXCURSION:BIRCH 6200.202 JUN 2017 LEGAL SERVICES Amount Paid Check Total 1,470.00 229.78 33.17 592.65 490.67 1,096,954.00 496,175.00 -24,808.75 10.00 305.00 150.00 834.05 1,680.00 971.06 723.90 637.52 2,453.94 31,635.60 143.92 31.00 93,141.99 1,470.00 229.78 1,116.49 1,096,954.00 471,366.25 10.00 305.00 150.00 834.05 1,680.00 971.06 35,450.96 143.92 31.00 JUN 2017 LEGAL SERVICES 989.00 94,130.99 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 184328 08/03/2017 017391 RISE INTERPRETING, INC. ASL INTERPRETING SRVCS:CONTRACTED CLASSE 184329 08/03/2017 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR JUN '17 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS Amount Paid Check Total 675.56 675.56 4,104.50 4,104.50 184330 08/03/2017 010777 RIVERSIDE CO EXECUTIVE JUL-SEPTANIMALSHELTER 40,471.41 OFFICE OPERATIONS FY 16/17 SCFA MISC REIMB EXPENSES 151.30 184331 08/03/2017 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS FY 17/18 CAL -ID AGENCY 109,064.00 DEPT ASSESSMENT 184332 08/03/2017 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF APR -JUN '17 VECTOR CONTROL SRVCS: B&S 40,622.71 109,064.00 3,539.98 3,539.98 184333 08/03/2017 014311 RMSJ, INC. BOOSTER PUMP:MARGARITASPLASH 1,080.13 PAD BOOSTER PUMP MOTOR:MARG SPLASH 946.63 2,026.76 184334 08/03/2017 020089 RODRIGUEZ, GABY REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 200.00 200.00 184335 08/03/2017 017549 ROSEN & ROSEN INDUSTRIES, MISC SUPPLIES:PW STREET MAINT 307.49 307.49 INC. 184336 08/03/2017 012251 ROTH, DONALD J. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 630.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 210.00 840.00 184337 08/03/2017 016383 S & R TOWING TOWING SERVICES:POLICE 634.00 634.00 184338 08/03/2017 020084 SAAVEDRA, MARNEL REFUND:MOTHERSON DATE NIGHT 9065.201 184339 08/03/2017 017424 SAMPLE, MARCIA EE COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM 184340 08/03/2017 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 24.00 24.00 788.98 788.98 35.00 1,092.00 525.00 184341 08/03/2017 010089 SECURITAS SECURITY SRVCS SECURITY SRVCS: 4TH OF JULY 375.00 USA EVENT SECURITY SRVCS: 4TH OF JULY EVENT 1,704.25 184342 08/03/2017 013376 SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES REPLACE FIRE SYS DETECTOR: 773.26 INC THEATER 184343 08/03/2017 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 7/27 1,652.00 2,079.25 773.26 600.00 600.00 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 184344 08/03/2017 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW Description PUBLIC NTC POSTING XX1158/0517:PLNG USE TAX/PUBLIC NTCS POSTING:PLNG CITY FLAGS: CIVIC CENTER 184345 08/03/2017 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 7590095944 RELOC FACS:PECH PKWY WIDENING 184346 08/03/2017 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 184347 08/03/2017 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN 2-30-099-3847:29721 RYECREST JUL 2-28-331-4847:32805 PAUBA RD LS3 JUL 2-34-624-4452:32131 S LOOP RD LOl JUL 2-35-164-3770:43487 BUTTERFIELD JUL 2-33-357-5785:44747 REDHAWK PKV\ JUL 2-35-164-3242:44270 MEADOWS PKV JUL 2-35-164-3515:32932 LEENA WAY JUL 2-35-164-3663:42335 MEADOWS PKV JUN 2-30-296-9522:46679 PRIMROSE AVE JUL 181-383-8881-6:28314 MERCEDES ST JUL 091-024-9300-5:30875 RANCHO VIST JUL 101-525-0950-0:28816 PUJOL ST JUL 026-671-2909-8:42051 MAIN ST JUL 028-025-1468-3:41375 MCCABE CT JUL 021-725-0775-4:41845 6TH ST JUL 125-244-2108-3:30600 PAUBA RD JUL 098-255-9828-8:29119 MARGARITA JUL 129-535-4236-7:41000 MAIN ST JUL 129-582-9784-3:43230 BUS PARK DR JUL 133-040-7373-0:43210 BUS PARK DR JUL 117-188-6393-6:32131 S LOOP RD JUL 101-525-1560-6:27415 ENTERPRISE JUL 095-167-7907-2:30650 PAUBA RD 184348 08/03/2017 020015 SOCALAPPLIED VYING CHUN DEMONSTRATION:CULTURE QUEST ACADEM CAMP 7/18 184349 08/03/2017 005786 SPRINT JUN 20 - JUL 19 CELLULAR USAGE/EQUIP Amount Paid Check Total 213.75 -1.00 2,538.28 2,751.03 109, 513.62 109, 513.62 24.14 96.48 637.94 26.27 38.64 24.14 24.45 24.45 354.11 20.55 1,250.62 209.06 23.40 26.25 20.55 71.01 16.73 44.19 519.24 31.01 19.60 21.43 87.91 107.29 1,218.22 50.00 50.00 110.00 110.00 184350 08/03/2017 019250 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC TRAFFIC SGNL MAI NT SRVCS: PW 3,530.00 3,530.00 MAINT 4/13 184351 08/03/2017 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC REFRESHMENTS:HUMAN SERVICES 75.96 75.96 7/20 184352 08/03/2017 018844 STANTEC CONSULTING JUN DSGN & ENG SRVCS:BTRFLD STG SERVICES RD PH II 2,931.00 2,931.00 Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 184353 08/03/2017 016262 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS INSTRUCTION Amount Paid Check Total 875.00 875.00 184354 08/03/2017 013331 STUDENT OF THE MONTH FY17/18 COUNCIL COMMUNITY SRVC 750.00 750.00 PRGM, INC FUNDING 184355 08/03/2017 019018 SUNRUN INSTALLATION REFUND:80% BLDG FEES:B17-0287 115.68 115.68 184356 08/03/2017 007698 SWANK MOTIONS PICTURES, MOVIE RENTALS:MOVIES IN THE PARK 543.00 543.00 INC. 7/21 184357 08/03/2017 013357 TEAM EVANGELICAL FY 16/17 CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT 2,027.22 2,027.22 ASSISTANCE 184358 08/03/2017 010679 TEMECULA AUTO VEHICLE MAI NT& REPAIR:TCSD 1,471.83 1,471.83 REPAIR/RADIATOR 184359 08/03/2017 008311 TEMECULA VALLEY ATHLETIC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,151.50 CLUB TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 409.50 1,561.00 184360 08/03/2017 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER AV SRVCS:'17 STATE OF CITY 6,100.00 6,100.00 OF ADDRESS 5/11 184361 08/03/2017 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JUL HIGH SPEED INTERNET:40820 1.60 WINCHESTER JUL HIGH SPEED INTERNET:41000 MAIN 4,539.02 184362 08/03/2017 019100 TNT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP DY & SOUND SRVCS:CONCERT 787.00 LLC SERIES 7/27 DY & SOUND SRVCS:MOVIES IN PARK 7/ 1,400.00 4,540.62 2,187.00 184363 08/03/2017 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PARTS:PW STREET 9.14 9.14 MAI NT 184364 08/03/2017 017579 U.S. HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HR 55.00 55.00 184365 08/03/2017 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE JUN UNDERGROUND UTILITY 243.00 243.00 ALERT LOCATOR ALERTS:P 184366 08/03/2017 019793 URBANE CAFE FOOD:ART OFF THE WALLS EVENTS 278.44 278.44 184367 08/03/2017 008977 VALLEY EVENTS, INC. RENTAL EQUIP:MEMORIAL DAY 5/29 FACE PAINTERS:JULY CONCERT SERIES FACE PAINTERS:4TH OF JULY 184368 08/03/2017 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 6/16-7/15 BROADBAND SVCS:CITYWI DE 109.50 1,160.00 2,000.00 3,269.50 2,185.55 2,185.55 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 12 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 184369 08/03/2017 018995 VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS Amount Paid Check Total 1,323.00 1,323.00 184370 08/03/2017 007987 WALMART RECREATION SUPPLIES:DAY CAMP 225.69 225.69 184371 08/03/2017 003730 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC 5/1-15/17 TREE TRIM SRVCS:CITY R -O -WS 6/16-30/17 TREE TRIMS & REMOVALS:MF 184372 08/03/2017 013556 WESTERN AV 11,826.00 1,889.00 13, 715.00 CANYONS CONF ROOM A/V SUPPORT 240.00 TIGHTROPE SYSTEM INSTALL:INFO TEC 184373 08/03/2017 002841 WESTERN OILFIELDS SUPPLY TEMPORARY IRRIGATION:4TH OF JULY CO 2017 184374 08/03/2017 018871 WONDER SCIENCE 1,725.00 1,965.00 7,052.13 7,052.13 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,457.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,646.00 5,103.00 1001746 07/20/2017 020077 BHARADWAJ, RAHUL REFUND:MISS CATHY'S TINY TOTS 66.00 66.00 1045.201 1001747 07/20/2017 020078 HANLON, ROBIN REFUND:BAKERY BOOT CAMP FOR 79.20 79.20 KIDS 1001748 07/20/2017 020079 HORSPOOL, AMBER REFUND:CREDIT:RM RENTAL:LIBRARY 105.00 105.00 1001749 07/20/2017 019553 WARREN, DOUGLAS REFUND:CREDIT:RM RENTAL:LIBRARY 210.00 210.00 1001750 07/20/2017 019995 WILLIAMS, DEE REFUND:SEMI-PRIVATE LESSONS 75.00 75.00 5202.305 1001751 07/20/2017 019995 WILLIAMS, DEE REFUND:SEMI-PRIVATE LESSONS 37.50 37.50 5202.304 1001752 07/20/2017 018767 DIONISIO, MARYABIGAIL REFUND:U-JAM DANCE FITNESS 20.00 20.00 3500.202 1001753 07/20/2017 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CONF 200.00 200.00 DIST-FEES CTR A/B 1001754 07/20/2017 017768 HANES, SONYA REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0410.205 20.00 20.00 1001755 07/20/2017 017768 HANES, SONYA REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0410.205 188.00 188.00 1001756 07/20/2017 020080 MANCINI, MARIA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 100.00 100.00 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 1001757 07/28/2017 020091 PENJWINI, NARGIS REFUND:WONDERS! SPEED MATH 1800.201 1001758 07/28/2017 020092 LOTZGESELL, KIRK REFUND:GEARS 2 ROBOTS - LEGO 2645.201 1001759 07/28/2017 020093 SORIANO, EDLIN REFUND:HAWAIIAN TAHITIAN DANCE BEG. Amount Paid Check Total 420.00 420.00 120.00 120.00 44.00 44.00 1001760 07/28/2017 020093 SORIANO, EDLIN REFUND:HAWAIIAN TAHITIAN DANCE 44.00 44.00 BEG. 1001761 07/28/2017 020094 LY, SOPHEAP REFUND:SEMI-PRIVATE LESSONS 5202.403 150.00 150.00 1001762 07/28/2017 016603 ACUNA, GINA REFUND:WONDERS! SUPER CAMP 105.00 105.00 1850.207 1001763 07/28/2017 020095 HERRERA, LAURA REFUND:VIPER VOLLEYBALL 3020.202 95.00 95.00 1001764 07/28/2017 020096 KEITH, JENNIFER REFUND:LEVEL 3 SWIM LESSONS 5103.408 1001765 07/28/2017 020096 KEITH, JENNIFER REFUND:LEVEL 2 SWIM LESSONS 5102.410 1001766 07/28/2017 020097 SUKANTAWANICH, ELIZA REFUND:LEVEL 3 SWIM LESSONS 5103.416 1001767 07/28/2017 020098 LEE, ELIZABETH 1001768 07/28/2017 020098 LEE, ELIZABETH 1001769 07/28/2017 020065 LIVERSAGE, SANDRA 1001770 07/28/2017 020065 LIVERSAGE, SANDRA 1001771 07/28/2017 018025 BADELL, GAIL 1001772 07/28/2017 020099 WALTZ, MICHAEL 1001773 07/28/2017 020099 WALTZ, MICHAEL 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 72.00 72.00 REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0405.205 20.00 20.00 REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0405.205 196.00 196.00 REFUND:CREDIT:RM RENTAL:TCC 60.00 60.00 REFUND:CREDIT:RM RENTAL:TCC 14.55 14.55 REFUND:VIPER VOLLEYBALL 3020.202 95.00 95.00 REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0400.204 480.00 480.00 REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 0400.204 40.00 40.00 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 14 Grand total for UNION BANK: 2,528,613.56 Page:14 apChkLst 08/03/2017 10:33:38AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 15 181 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 2,528,613.56 Page:15 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance 17-05 Amending Chapter 15.08, Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program, and Finding this Action Exempt from CEQA (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 17-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, AND FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present. Ordinance No. 17-05 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of August 8, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 17-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, AND FINDING THIS ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 15.08.010. Title. This Chapter shall be known as the "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program of 2017." 15.08.020 Findings. In adopting this Chapter, the City Council finds and determines that: A. The City is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and 18 cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, the WRCOG Member Agencies developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in Western Riverside County (the "Regional System") could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") on future residential, commercial and industrial development. As a Member Agency of WRCOG and as a TUMF Participating Jurisdiction, the City participated in the preparation of a certain "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study," dated October 18, 2002 (the "2002 Nexus Study") prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.) and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. The City also participated in the second major update of the TUMF network entitled the "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study; 2009 Update" ("2009 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. Based on the 2002 and 2009 Nexus Studies, the City adopted and implemented ordinances authorizing the City's participation in a TUMF Program. B. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2016 Update" ("2016 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Ords 17-05 1 Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program. C. Consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of Ordinance No. 10-02, the City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds and determines, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable Levels of Service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF Program is essential. D. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied. E. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system. Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF. F. The City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the 2016 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development. G. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2016 Nexus Study. The need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements. H. The City Council finds and determines that the 2016 Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements and facilities to the Regional system. Ords 17-05 2 The City Council hereby adopts the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2016 Update and its findings, a true, correct and complete copy of which is attached to Ordinance No. 17-05 as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein. 15.08.030 Definitions. For the purpose of this Chapter, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the following meanings: A. "Class 'A' Office" means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, on-site support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to a bank, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class `A" Office shall be as follows: (i) minimum of three stories (exception will be made for March JPA, where height requirements exist); (ii) minimum of 10,000 square feet per floor; (iii) steel frame construction; (iv) central, interior lobby; and (v) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/ exits for commercial uses within the building. B. "Class `B' Office" means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, on-site support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to a bank, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class `B" Office shall be as follows: (i) minimum of two stories; (ii) minimum of 15,000 square feet per floor; (iii) steel frame, concrete or masonry shell construction; (iv) central, interior lobby; and (v) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/exits for commercial uses within the building. C. "Development Project" or "Project" means any project undertaken for the purposes of development, including the issuance of a permit for construction. D. "Disabled Veteran" means any veteran who is retired or is in process of medical retirement from military service who is or was severely injured in a theatre of combat operations and has or received a letter of eligibility for the Veterans Administration Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Grant Program. Ords 17-05 3 E. "Government/Public Buildings, Public Schools and Public Facilities" means any owned and operated facilities by a government entity in accordance with Section 15.08.040.F., Exemptions. A new development that is subject to a long-term lease with a government agency for government/public buildings, public schools, and public facilities shall apply only if all of the following conditions are met: (a) The new development being constructed is subject to a long-term lease with a government agency. (b) The project shall have a deed restriction placed on the property that limits the use to government/public facility for the term of the lease, including all extension options, for a period of not less than 20 years. Any change in the use of the facility from government shall trigger the payment of the TUMF in effect at the time of the change is made. (c) No less than ninety percent (90%) of the total square footage of the building is leased to the government agency during the term of deed restriction the long term and any extensions thereof. (d) The new development is constructed at prevailing wage rates. (e) A copy of the lease is provided to the applicable jurisdiction and to WRCOG. (f) Based on the facts and circumstances WRCOG determines that the intent of the lease is to provide for a long-term government use, and not to evade payment of TUMF. F. "Gross Acreage" means the total property area as shown on a land division of a map of record, or described through a recorded legal description of the property. This area shall be bounded by road rights of way and property lines. G. "Guest Dwellings" and "Detached Second Units" mean, according to the State of California legal definition, as follows: 1) The second unit is not intended for sale and may be rented; 2) The lot is zoned for single- family dwellings; 3) The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling; 4) The second unit is either attached to the existing dwelling and located within the living area of the existing dwelling or detached from the existing dwelling and located on the same lot as the existing dwelling; and 5) Are ministerially amended by each jurisdiction's local codes. H. "Habitable Structure" means any structure or part thereof where persons reside, congregate or work and which is legally occupied in whole or part in accordance with applicable building codes, and state and local laws. Ords 17-05 4 "Industrial Project" means any development project that proposes any industrial or manufacturing use allowed within certain zones by Title 17, Zoning of the Temecula Municipal Code, including Business Park Zone (BP), Light Industrial District Zone (LI), a Specific Plan providing for industrial or manufacturing uses, or a Planned Development Overlay District providing for industrial or manufacturing uses. J. "Long -Term Lease" as used in the TUMF Program, shall mean a lease with a term of no less than twenty (20) years. K. "Low Income Residential Housing" means "Residential Affordable Units": (A) for rental housing, the units shall be made available, rented and restricted to "lower income households" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5) at an "affordable rent" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50053). Affordable units that are rental housing shall be made available, rented, and restricted to lower income households at an affordable rent for a period of at least fifty-five (55) years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new residential development. and (B) for for -sale housing, the units shall be sold to "persons or families of low or moderate income" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50093) at a purchase price that will not cause the purchaser's monthly housing cost to exceed "affordable housing cost (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5) Affordable units that are for - sale housing units shall be restricted to ownership by persons and families of low or moderate income for at least forty-five (45) years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new residential development. L. "Mixed -Use Development" as used in the TUMF Program, means Developments with the following criteria: (1) three or more significant revenue- producing uses, and (2) significant physical and functional integration of project components. M. "Multi -Family Residential Unit" means a development project that has a density of greater than eight (8) residential dwelling units per gross acre. N. "Non -Profit Organization" means an organization operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial port of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates. For the purposes of the TUMF Program, the non-profit may be a 501(c) (3) charitable organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service. Ords 17-05 5 O. "Non -Residential Unit" means retail commercial, service commercial and industrial development which is designed primarily for non - dwelling use, but shall include hotels and motels. P. "Recognized Financing District" means a Financing District as defined in the TUMF Administrative Plan as may be amended from time to time. Q. "Residential Dwelling Unit" means a building or portion thereof used by one (1) family and containing but one (1) kitchen, which is designed primarily for residential occupancy including single-family and multi -family dwellings. "Residential Dwelling Unit" shall not include hotels or motels. R. "Retail Commercial Project" means any development project that proposes any retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project allowed within certain zones by Title 17, Zoning, of the Temecula Municipal Code, including Neighborhood Commercial Zone (NP), Community Commercial Zone (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial Zone (HT) and Service Commercial Zone (SC), Professional Office Zone (PO), Business Park Zone (BP) a Specific Plan providing for retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project, or a Planned Development Overlay District providing for retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project, which can include any eating/dining facility residing on the retail commercial development premises. S. "Service Commercial Project" means any development project that is predominately dedicated to business activities associated with professional or administrative services, and typically consists of corporate offices, financial institutions, legal, and medical offices eating/dining facilities, and other uses related to personal or professional services. T. "Single Family Residential Unit" means each residential dwelling unit in a development that has a density of eight (8) units to the gross acre or less. U. "TUMF Administrative Plan" means that the TUMF Administration Plan adopted by the WRCOG Execution Committee May 5, 2003, as amended, setting forth detailed administration procedures and requirements for the TUMF program. V. "TUMF Participating Jurisdiction" means a jurisdiction in Western Riverside County which has adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing participation in the TUMF Program and complies with all regulations established in the TUMF Administrative Plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the WRCOG. 15.08.040 Establishment of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee. Ords 17-05 6 A. Adoption of TUMF Schedule. The City Council shall adopt an applicable TUMF schedule through a separate resolution, which may be amended from time to time. B. Fee Calculation. The fees shall be calculated according to the calculation methodology fee set forth in the WRCOG TUMF Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time. In addition to data in the Fee Calculation Handbook, WRCOG Staff and the local agency may consider the following items when establishing the appropriate fee calculation methodology: • Underlying zoning of the site • Land -use classifications in the latest Nexus Study • Project specific traffic studies • Latest Standardized reference manuals such as the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual • Previous TUMF calculations for similar uses • WRCOG staff shall approve final draft credit / reimbursement agreement prior to execution WRCOG shall have final determination regarding the appropriate methodology to calculate the fee based on the information provided. In case of a conflict between the applicant, WRCOG, and/or the local agency regarding the fee calculation methodology, the dispute resolution process in the TUMF Administrative Plan will apply. C. Fee Adjustment. The fee schedule may be periodically reviewed and the amounts adjusted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. By amendment to the Resolution reference is subsection A, above, the fees may be increased or decreased to reflect the changes in actual and estimated costs of the Regional System including, but not limited to, debt service, lease payments and construction costs. The adjustment of the fees may also reflect changes in the facilities required to be constructed, in estimated revenues received pursuant to this Chapter, as well as the availability or lack thereof of other funds with which to construct the Regional System. WRCOG shall review the TUMF Program no less than every four (4) years after the effective date of this Chapter. D. Purpose. The purpose of the TUMF is to fund those certain improvements to the Regional System as depicted in the 2016 Nexus Study. E. Applicability. The TUMF shall apply to all new development within the City, unless otherwise exempt hereunder. Ords 17-05 7 F. Exemptions. The following types of new development shall be exempt from the provisions of this Chapter and in TUMF Administrative Plan: 1. Low income residential housing as described in Subsection K. of 15.08.020, Definitions, and in the TUMF Administrative Plan. 2. Government/public buildings, public schools, and public facilities as described in Subsection E. of 15.08.020, Definitions, and in the TUMF Administrative Plan. Airports that are public use airports and are appropriately permitted by Caltrans or other state agency. 3. Development Projects which are the subject of a Public Facilities Development Agreement entered into pursuant to Government Code section 65864 et seq, prior May 28, 2003, the effective date of Ordinance No. 03-01, wherein the imposition of new fees are expressly prohibited, provided that if the term of such a Development Agreement is extended by amendment or by any other manner after May 28, 2003, the TUMF shall be imposed. 4. The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any habitable structure in use on or after January 1, 2000, provided that the same or fewer traffic trips are generated as a result thereof. 5. Guest Dwellings and Detached Second Units as described in Subsection G. of Section 15.08.020, Definitions, and in the TUMF Administrative Plan. 6. Kennels (including catteries) established in connection with an existing single family residential unit. 7. Any sanctuary, or other activity under the same roof of a church or other house of worship that is not revenue generating and is eligible for a property tax exemption (excluding concert venues, coffee/snack shops, book stores, for-profit pre-school day -cares, etc., which would be assessed TUMF.) 8. Any nonprofit corporation or nonprofit organization offering and conducting full-time day school at the elementary, middle school or high school level for students between the ages of five and eighteen years. 9. New single-family homes, constructed by non-profit organizations, specially adapted and designed for maximum freedom of movement and independent living for qualified "Disabled Veterans." 10. Other uses may be exempt as determined by the WRCOG Executive Committee as further defined in the TUMF Administrative Plan. Ords 17-05 8 G. Credit. Regional System improvements may be credited toward the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF Administrative Plan and the following: 1. Regional Tier a. Arterial Credits: If a developer constructs arterial improvements identified on the Regional System, the developer shall receive credit for all costs associated with the arterial component based on approved Nexus Study for the Regional System effective at the time the credit agreement is entered into. WRCOG staff must pre -approve any credit agreements that deviate from the standard WRCOG approved format. b. Other Credits: In special circumstances, when a developer constructs off-site improvements such as an interchange, bridge, or railroad grade separation, credits shall be determined by WRCOG and the City in consultation with the developer. All such credits must have prior written approval from WRCOG. c. The amount of the development fee credit shall not exceed the maximum amount determined by the Nexus Study for the Regional System at the time the credit agreement is entered into or actual costs, whichever is less. 2. Local Tier a. The local jurisdictions shall compare facilities in local fee programs against the Regional System and eliminate any overlap in its local fee program except where there is a Recognized Financing District has been established. b. If there is a Recognized Financing District established, the local agency may credit that portion of the facility identified in both programs against the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF Administrative Plan. 15.08.050 Reimbursements. Should the developer construct Regional System improvements in excess of the TUMF fee obligation, the developer may be reimbursed based on actual costs or the 2016 Nexus Study effective at the time the agreement was entered into, whichever is less. Reimbursements shall be enacted through an agreement between the developer and the City, contingent on funds being available and approved by WRCOG. In all cases, however, reimbursements under such special agreements must coincide with construction of the transportation improvements as scheduled in the five-year Zone Transportation Improvement Program's adopted annually by WRCOG. 15.08.060 Procedures for the Levy, Collection and Disposition of Fees. Ords 17-05 9 A. Authority of the Building Department. The Director of Building & Safety, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized to levy and collect the TUMF and make all determinations required by this Chapter in a manner consistent with the TUMF Administrative Plan. B. Payment. Payment of the fees shall be as follows: 1. The fees shall be paid at the time a certificate of occupancy is issued for the Development Project or upon final inspection, whichever comes first (the "Payment Date"). However, this section should not be construed to prevent payment of the fees prior to issuance of an occupancy permit or final inspection. Fees may be paid at the issuance of a building permit, and the fee payment shall be calculated based on the fee in effect at that time, provided the developer tenders the full amount of his/her TUMF obligation. If the developer makes only a partial payment prior to the Payment Date, the amount of the fee due shall be based on the TUMF fee schedule in place on the Payment Date. The fees shall be calculated according to fee schedule set forth in this Chapter, or resolution adopted pursuant thereto, and the calculation methodology set forth in the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time. 2. The fees required to be paid shall be the fee amounts in effect at the time of payment is due under this Chapter, not the date the the ordinance adopting this chapter is initially adopted. The City shall not enter into a development agreement which freezes future adjustments of the TUMF. 3. If all or part of any development project is sold prior to payment of the fee, the property shall continue to be subject to the requirement for payment of the fee. The obligation to pay the fee shall run with the land and be binding on all the successors in interest to the property. 4. Fees shall not be waived. C. Disposition of Fees. All fees collected hereunder shall be transmitted to the Executive Director of WRCOG along with a corresponding Remittance Report by the tenth (10) day of the close of the month for the previous month in which the fees were collected for deposit, investment, accounting and expenditure in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter, TUMF Administrative Plan, and the Mitigation Fee Act. D. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed with WRCOG in accordance with the provisions of the TUMF Administrative Plan. Appealable issues shall be the application of the fee, application of credits, application of Ords 17-05 10 reimbursement, application of the legal action stay and application of exemption. E. Reports to WRCOG. The Director of Building and Safety, or his/her designee, shall prepare and deliver to the Executive Director of WRCOG, periodic reports as will be established under Section 15.08.070. 15.08.070 Appointment of the TUMF Administrator. A. WRCOG is hereby appointed as the Administrator of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program. WRCOG is hereby authorized to receive all fees generated from the TUMF within the City, and to invest, account for and expend such fees in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter and the Mitigation Fee Act. The detailed administrative procedures concerning the implementation of this Chapter shall be contained in the TUMF Administrative Plan. Furthermore, the TUMF Administrator shall use the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time, for the purpose of calculating a developer's TUMF obligation. In addition to detailing the methodology for calculating all TUMF obligations of different categories of new development, the purpose of the Fee Calculation Handbook is to clarify for the TUMF Administrator, where necessary, the definition and calculation methodology for uses not clearly defined in the respective TUMF ordinances. B. WRCOG shall expend only that amount of the funds generated from the TUMF for staff support, audit, administrative expenses, and contract services that are necessary and reasonable to carry out its responsibilities and in no case shall the funds expended for salaries and benefits exceed one percent (1 %) of the revenue raised by the TUMF Program. The TUMF Administrative Plan further outlines the fiscal responsibilities and limitations of the Administrator. 15.08.08- Effect. No provisions of this Chapter shall entitle any person who has already paid the TUMF to receive a refund, credit or reimbursement of such payment. This Chapter does not create any new TUMF. Section 2 Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 8, 2017, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the 2016 Nexus Study, the amendments to Chapter 15.08, and the fees set forth in this Resolution. The public hearing was noticed at least ten (10) days prior to this hearing and the City Council made the 2016 Nexus Study available to the public during this period. Ords 17-05 11 B. The City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public at the public hearing relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. Section 3. CEQA. The City Council hereby determines, in accordance with 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines") that the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program as described in this Ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378 and Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. The Ordinance establishes a funding mechanism for potential transportation improvements and does not approve the construction nor cause the construction of any specific transportation improvements within Riverside County. This Ordinance will have no effect on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(d)and 15062, the City Manager is hereby directed to cause a Notice of Exemption to be prepared, executed and filed for the foregoing determination in the manner required by law, that this is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, not environmental impact assessment is necessary. Section 4. Severability. If any one or more of the terms, provisions or sections of this Ordinance shall to any extent be judged invalid, unenforceable and/or voidable for any reason whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdiction, then each and all of the remaining terms, provisions and sections of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable. Section 5. Judicial Review. In accordance with State law, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Ordinance shall be commenced within ninety (90) days of the date of adoption of this Ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective November 1, 2017. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Ords 17-05 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 17-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of August, 2017, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of August, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Ords 17-05 13 EXHIBIT "A" 2016 NEXUS STUDY WRCOG TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE NEXUS STUDY 2016 UPDATE FINAL REPORT Prepared for the Western Riverside Council of Governments In Cooperation with The City of Banning The City of Beaumont The City of Calimesa The City of Canyon Lake The City of Corona The City of Eastvale The City of Hemet The City of Jurupa Valley The City of Lake Elsinore The City of Menifee The City of Moreno Valley The City of Murrieta The City of Norco The City of Perris The City of Riverside The City of San Jacinto The City of Temecula The City of Wildomar The County of Riverside Eastern Municipal Water District March Joint Powers Authority Morongo Band of Mission Indians Riverside County Superintendent of Schools Riverside Transit Agency Western Municipal Water District Prepared by WSP As adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee, July 10, 2017 XX ) TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i LIST OF TABLES ii ES.0 Executive Summary iii ES.1 Introduction and Purpose of the Nexus Study iii ES.2 Future Growth vi ES.3 Need for the TUMF vi ES.4 The TUMF Network viii ES.5 TUMF Nexus Analysis x ES.6 Fair -Share Fee Calculation x ES.7 Conclusions xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE NEXUS STUDY 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 TUMF Nexus Study History 2 1.3 TUMF Nexus Study Process 4 1.3.1. Establish the TUMF Network Project List 6 1.3.2. Determine the TUMF Network Project Costs 7 1.3.3. Determine the TUMF Transit Component 8 1.3.4. Computing the Fee for Residential Developments 8 1.3.5. Computing the Fee for Non -Residential Developments 9 2.0 FUTURE GROWTH 12 2.1 Recent Historical Trend 12 2.2 Available Demographic Data 12 2.3 Demographic Assumptions Used for the Nexus Study Analysis 13 3.0 NEED FOR THE TUMF 19 3.1 Future Highway Congestion Levels 19 3.2 Future Transit Utilization Levels 22 3.3 The TUMF Concept 23 4.0 THE TUMF NETWORK 25 4.1 Identification of the TUMF Roadway Network 25 4.2 Backbone Network and Secondary Network 28 4.3 Future Roadway Transportation Needs 31 4.4 Public Transportation Component of the TUMF System 36 4.5 Existing Obligated Funding 39 4.6 Unfunded Existing Improvement Needs 39 4.7 Maximum TUMF Eligible Cost 41 4.8 TUMF Network Evaluation 51 5.0 TUMF NEXUS ANALYSIS 53 5.1 Future Development and the Need for Improvements 53 5.2 Application of Fee to System Components 54 5.3 Application of Fee to Residential and Non -Residential Developments 57 6.0 FAIR -SHARE FEE CALCULATION 58 6.1 Residential Fees 58 6.2 Non -Residential Fees 59 7.0 CONCLUSIONS 61 8.0 APPENDICES 62 WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update i July 10, 2017 LIST OF TABLES Table ES.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County xii Table 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County 13 Table 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County 15 Table 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2012 to 2040) 16 Table 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) 18 Table 3.1 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2012 Baseline to 2040 No -Build) ....20 Table 4.1 - Unit Costs for Arterial Highway and Street Construction 34 Table 4.2 - Forecasted Daily Traffic in Western Riverside County 34 Table 4.3 - Unit Costs for Transit Capital Expenditures 38 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates 44 Table 4.5 - TUMF Transit Cost Estimates 51 Table 4.6 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2012 Baseline and 2040 No -Build Scenarios to 2040 TUMF Build Scenario) 52 Table 5.1 - 2040 Peak Period Vehicle Trips By WRCOG Zone 55 Table 5.2 - 2040 Percent Peak Period Vehicle Trips By WRCOG Zone 55 Table 5.3 - Backbone -Secondary Network Share Calculation 56 Table 5.4 - Peak Period VMT Growth by Trip Purpose for Western Riverside County (2012 - 2040) 57 Table 6.1 - Fee Calculation for Residential Share 59 Table 6.2 - Fee Calculation for Non -Residential Share 60 Table 7.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County 61 LIST OF FIGURES Figure ES.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process v Figure ES.2 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2012 to 2040) vii Figure ES.3 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials-TUMF Network Improvements .. ix Figure 1.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process 5 Figure 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County 14 Figure 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County 15 Figure 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2012 to 2040) 17 Figure 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) 18 Figure 4.1 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials for Western Riverside County 27 Figure 4.2 - The Backbone Network of Highways and Arterials for Western Riverside County 29 Figure 4.3 - Western Riverside County Area Planning Districts (TUMF Zones) 30 Figure 4.4 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials-TUMF Network Improvements 43 WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update ii July 10, 2017 ES.O EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 Introduction and Purpose of the Nexus Study Western Riverside County includes 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated county covering an area of approximately 2,100 square miles. Through the mid 2000's, this portion of Riverside County was growing at a pace exceeding the capacity of existing financial resources to meet increasing demand for transportation infrastructure. Although the economic recession of the late 2000's, and the associated crises in the mortgage and housing industries, has slowed this rate of growth, the region is expected to rebound and the projected growth in Western Riverside County is expected to increase. This increase in growth could significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial roadways of regional significance, since traditional sources of transportation funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the needed improvements. In February 1999, the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore, the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the Building Industry Association (BIA) met to discuss the concept of a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) for southwest Riverside County. In August 2000, the concept was expanded to include the entire WRCOG sub- region. The TUMF Program is implemented through the auspices of WRCOG. As the council of governments for Western Riverside County, WRCOG provides a forum for representatives from 18 cities, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Eastern and Western Municipal Water Districts, the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, the March Joint Powers Authority, the Riverside Transit Agency and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians to collaborate on issues that affect the entire subregion, such as air quality, solid waste, transportation and the environment. While the TUMF cannot fund all necessary transportation system improvements, it is intended to address a current transportation funding shortfall by establishing a new revenue source that ensures future development will contribute toward addressing the impacts of new growth on regional transportation infrastructure. Funding accumulated through the TUMF Program will be used to construct transportation improvements that will be needed to accommodate future travel demand in Western Riverside County. By levying a fee on new developments in the region, local agencies will be establishing a mechanism by which developers and in turn new county residents and employees will effectively contribute their "fair share" toward sustaining the regional transportation system. This TUMF Draft Nexus Study is intended to satisfy the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 5 Section 66000-66008 Fees for Development Projects (also known as California Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) or the Mitigation Fee Act) which governs imposing development impact fees in California. The initial WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study was completed in October 2002 and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in November 2002. The results of the first review of the Program were WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update iii July 10, 2017 documented in the TUMF Nexus Study 2005 Update adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on February 6, 2006. A second comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2008 and 2009 in part to address the impacts of the economic recession on the rate of development within the region and on transportation project costs. The findings of the 2009 review of the program were adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on October 5, 2009. A third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2014 and 2015 leading to a Draft Nexus Study document being distributed for review in August 2015. The WRCOG Executive Committee subsequently considered comments related to the Draft Nexus Study 2015 Update at the meeting held on September 14, 2015 where it was resolved to "delay finalizing the Nexus Study for the TUMF Program Update until the 2016 Southern California Association of Governments' 2016 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy growth forecast is available for inclusion in the Nexus Study". The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2016- 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) on April 7, 2016 enabling WRCOG staff to proceed with finalizing the update of the TUMF Nexus Study. The overall process for establishing the TUMF nexus is illustrated in Figure ES.1. Each technical step is denoted with a number on the flow chart with the numbers correlating to the detailed description of each step provided in Section 1.3 of the Nexus Study Report. The flow chart also incorporates color coding of the steps to indicate those steps that involved the application of the Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model (RivTAM), steps that utilized other input data, steps that are computations of various inputs, and steps that required specific actions of the various WRCOG committees to confirm major variables. Where appropriate, the flow chart also includes specific cross references to the sections or tables included in the Nexus Study document that correlate to the particular step. This version of the WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study Report documents the final results of the third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program to incorporate the revisions completed during 2016. This version of the document also incorporates revisions in response to comments received during the 45 day review of the earlier Draft TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update. The findings of this report were ultimately adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 10, 2017. WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update iv July 10, 2017 Figure ES.I - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process TUMF Road Project List 0 1...T.t)1,1•.• I rts.0 LDS 0 °. Fossil CarPaciD . _ 1hew I 0 ,.... c,,,„ 0 IWO P)xlcop i PatiCcti)r) EItt*PDAti ._ CO. . T pi. i T 0 . tapiCri Drtcsoma Allipthrtat. I. Pim OiresSoeirserl v. Mom Roidj Project Ust . .1— it, ..1_ .• V, isassiatedDrxis al P3AF Prop: u Residential Fee Calculation (Table 6.1 & Appendix IQ Fends 109 Tne•teri Rates • EclarsiD oDeoritlimattes be SO STD CO Rtad Prni Casts itanterussleID Devale.reet lom Der *issuer losstAii esermas TUMF Road Project Cost Estimates 411)- TUMF Ct.rtp. 0 upoosoo Dart Standsne1 Gnu llof Frans T. Ceeaswesiers AI TUMF Transit Component CVFT& CoropeNenurr dpion 4,1 ,4 44ppendm 13.) • r 0 itre,S Stee. 0 T UMFlisroJi 0 Uriems:Zrons0 • FF -1- 20.41Fiwvi &44nhp '4{. AtcFmmel 'tx onir GrawIte *ti, situ . . CO' trAil= to SFO MRI ()Mere Or Preiner Dowarineetalth 42177 — Foci— per DU Fee pe—ir 6F es DM Nears Study and Schedule of Fees C)—mwtrn. Fee Dalailation=lbook 1 (Appicable to sane pmject types) MOW hoi pH Olt ITI.Ine•Den Dais es Welke Code afikesi Non -Residential Fee Calculation (Table 6.2 & Appendix L) ve-emore-im Mssrent 1 IIPIPIRP SIPE Pan It) IrLin L 1,4, Sias 14J 0 I. OM Ft/mallet &ma" EMP1.4.00 OW* SW*, S.r4. tr-I tos Sector les 2.3 L.2 i .111 0 Growth In 118F for I Flatd,Sondee,Induetrid:j A Public Satins _ . o Gprorn otInso kr I Sown, indrebul. &non Vase sin. KEY °Reference to Description in Text Other Inputs Computodons Items ter KO ! Adoption WRCOGvAdopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study -2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 ES.2 Future Growth For earlier versions of the TUMF Nexus Study, the primary available source of consolidated demographic information for Western Riverside County was provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Recognizing the need to develop a more comprehensive source of socioeconomic data for Riverside County, the Riverside County Center for Demographic Research (RCCDR) was established under the joint efforts of the County of Riverside, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, and the University of California, Riverside in 2005. RCCDR provided demographic estimates and forecasts for Riverside County as input to the SCAG regional forecasts as well as providing the demographic basis for the Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model (RivTAM). RCCDR data was used as the basis for the TUMF Nexus Study 2009 Update. As directed by the WRCOG Executive Committee, the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS demographics forecasts were utilized as the basis for this 2016 Update of the TUMF Nexus Study. A major distinction between RCCDR data used for the TUMF Nexus Study 2009 Update and the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS data used for this 2016 Update is the change in the base year from 2007 to 2012, as well as the change in the horizon year from 2035 to 2040. This shift in the base year and horizon year demographic assumptions of the program carries through all aspects of the nexus analysis, including the travel demand forecasting, network review and fee calculation. The population of Western Riverside County is projected to increase by 37% in the period between 2012 and 2040. During the same period, employment in Western Riverside County is anticipated to grow by 87%. Figure ES.2 illustrates the forecast growth in population, household and employment for Western Riverside County. ES.3 Need for the TUMF The WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from the greater regional model network for the purpose of calculating measures for Western Riverside County only. Peak period performance measures for the TUMF study area included total vehicle miles of travel (VMT), total vehicle hours of travel (VHT), total combined vehicle hours of delay (VHD), and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E). As a result of the new development and associated growth in population and employment in Western Riverside County, additional pressure will be placed on the transportation infrastructure, particularly the arterial roadways, with the peak period VMT on the TUMF Network estimated to increase by 63% between 2012 and 2040. By 2040, 57% of the total VMT on the TUMF Network is forecast to be traveling on facilities experiencing peak period LOS E or worse. Without improvements to the arterial highway system, the total vehicle hours of delay (VHD) experienced by area motorists on the TUMF Network will increase over 4.9% per year. The need to improve these roadways and relieve future congestion is therefore directly linked to the future development which generates the travel demand. WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update vi July 10, 2017 Figure ES.2 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2012 to 2040) 2,500,000 2,000,000 1500,000 1,000,000 500,000 ,429,633 ,773, 539,631 366,588 '1, cy Jam„ PP \O.' S e"q 09 0qa , ) rl ODP a e e 201,328 101,729 120,736 526,092 253,372 Household Type: O Single -Family D Multi -Family Employment Sector: ▪ Industrial ® Retail ® Service L3 Government As population and employment in Western Riverside County grows as a result of new development, demand for regional transit services in the region is also expected to grow. Weekday system ridership for RTA bus transit services is approximately 31,016 riders per day in Western Riverside County in 2015. By 2025, bus transit services are forecast to serve approximately 46,572 riders per weekday. This represents an average increase of 1,414 weekday riders each year. Based on this rate of ridership growth, weekday ridership is estimated to increase by 41,011 riders per weekday between 2012 and 2040. The idea behind a uniform mitigation fee is to have new development throughout the region contribute equally to paying the cost of improving the transportation facilities that serve these longer -distance trips between communities. Thus, the fee should be used to improve transportation facilities that serve trips between communities within the region (primarily arterial roadways) as well as the infrastructure for public transportation. WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update vii July 10, 2017 The fee should be assessed proportionately on new residential and non-residential development based on the relative impact of each use on the transportation system. ES.4 The TUMF Network The Regional System of Highways and Arterials (also referred to as the TUMF Network) is the system of roadways that serve inter -community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. Transportation facilities in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied select performance guidelines were identified, and a skeletal regional transportation framework evolved from facilities where multiple guidelines were observed. This framework was reviewed by representatives of all WRCOG constituent jurisdictions and private sector stakeholders, and endorsed by the WRCOG Public Works Committee, WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee, TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee. The TUMF Network was refined to distinguish between facilities of "Regional Significance" and facilities of "Zonal Significance". The Facilities of Regional Significance have been identified as the "backbone" highway network for Western Riverside County. Facilities of Zonal Significance (the "secondary" network) represent the balance of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials for Western Riverside County. A portion of the TUMF is specifically designated for improvement projects on the backbone system and on the secondary network within the zone in which it is collected. Figure ES.3 illustrates the TUMF improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials. The total cost of improving the TUMF system is $3.76 billion. Accounting for obligated funds and unfunded existing needs, the estimated maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program is $2.96 billion. The maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program includes approximately $2.71 billion in eligible arterial highway and street related improvements and $92.6 million in eligible transit related improvements. An additional $43.3 million is also eligible as part of the TUMF Program to mitigate the impact of eligible TUMF related arterial highway and street projects on critical native species and wildlife habitat, while $1 12.2 million is provided to cover the costs incurred by WRCOG to administer the TUMF Program. WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update viii July 10, 2017 rirnssolL Regional System of Highways and Arterials (RSHA) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program 1 Figure ES.3 ES.5 TUMF Nexus Analysis There is a reasonable relationship between the future growth and the need for improvements to the TUMF system. These factors include: • Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing as a result of future new development. • Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways. • The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County. > Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development. • Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program. > Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automobile travel. The split of fee revenues between the backbone and secondary highway networks is related to the proportion of highway vehicle travel that is relatively local (between adjacent communities) and longer distance (between more distant communities but still within Western Riverside County). To estimate a rational fee split between the respective networks, the future travel forecast estimates were aggregated to a matrix of peak period trips between zones. The overall result is that 50.7% of the regional travel is attributable to the backbone network and 49.3% is assigned to the secondary network. In order to establish the approximate proportionality of the future traffic impacts associated with new residential development and new non-residential development, peak period growth in VMT between 2012 and 2040 was derived from RivTAM and aggregated by trip purpose. It was concluded that home-based person trips represent 71.0% of the total future person trips, and the non -home-based person trips represent 29.0% of the total future person trips. ES.6 Fair -Share Fee Calculation The balance of the unfunded TUMF system improvement needs is $2.96 billion which is the maximum value attributable to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development in the WRCOG region, and will be captured through the TUMF Program. By levying the uniform fee directly on future new developments (and indirectly on new residents and new employees to Western Riverside County), these transportation system users are assigned their "fair share" of the WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update x July 10, 2017 costs to address the cumulative impacts of additional traffic they will generate on the regional transportation system. Of the $2.96 billion in unfunded future improvement needs, 71.0% ($2.10 billion) will be assigned to future new residential development and 29.0% ($858.7 million) will be assigned to future new non-residential development. ES.7 Conclusions Based on the results of the Nexus Study evaluation, it can be demonstrated that there is reasonable relationship between the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the need to mitigate these transportation impacts using funds levied through the proposed TUMF Program. Factors that reflect this reasonable relationship include: ➢ Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing as a result of future new development. ➢ Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways; • The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County; ➢ Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative impacts of new development; ➢ Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program; • Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automotive travel. The Nexus Study evaluation has established a proportional "fair share" of the improvement cost attributable to new development based on the impacts of existing development and the availability of obligated funding through traditional sources. The fair share fee allocable to future new residential and non-residential development in Western Riverside County is summarized for differing use types in Table ES.1. WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update xi July 10, 2017 Table ES.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County Land Use Type Units Development Change Single Family Residential DU Multi Family Residential DU Industrial SF GFA Retail SF GFA Service SF GFA Government/Public SF GFA 173,043 77,039 64,710,138 17,920,500 105,21 1,915 2,696,349 MAXIMUM TUMF VALUE Fee Per Unit $9,418 $6,134 $1.77 $12.31 $4.56 $16.08 Total Revenue ($ million) $1,629.8 $472.5 $114.8 $220.5 $480.0 $43.4 $2,961.0 WRCOG Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update xii July 10, 2017 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE NEXUS STUDY 1.1 Background Western Riverside County includes 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated county covering an area of approximately 2,100 square miles. Through the mid 2000's, this portion of Riverside County was growing at a pace exceeding the capacity of existing financial resources to meet increasing demand for transportation infrastructure. Although the economic recession of the late 2000's, and the associated crises in the mortgage and housing industries, slowed this rate of growth, the regional economy is continuing to rebound and the projected rate of development in Western Riverside County is expected to increase. This increase in growth could significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial roadways of regional significance, since traditional sources of transportation funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the needed improvements. Development exactions only provide improvements near the development site, and the broad-based county -level funding sources (i.e., Riverside County's half -cent sales tax known as Measure A) designate only a small portion of their revenues for arterial roadway improvements. In anticipation of the continued future growth projected in Riverside County, several county -wide planning processes were initiated in 1999. These planning processes include the Riverside County General Plan Update, the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) and the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Related to these planning processes is the need to fund the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development. Regional arterial highways in Western Riverside County are forecast to carry significant traffic volumes by 2040. While some localized fee programs exist to mitigate the local impacts of new development on the transportation system in specific areas, and while these programs are effective locally, they are insufficient in their ability to meet the regional demand for transportation infrastructure. Former Riverside County Supervisor Buster recognized the need to establish a comprehensive funding source to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development on regional arterial highways. The need to establish a comprehensive funding source for arterial highway improvements has evolved into the development of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) for Western Riverside County. In February 1999, the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore, the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the Building Industry Association (BIA) met to discuss the concept of a TUMF. The intent of this effort was to have the southwest area of Western Riverside County act as a demonstration for the development of policies and a process for a regional TUMF Program before applying the concept countywide. From February 1999 to September 2000, the Southwest Area Transportation Infrastructure System WRCOG 1 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Funding Year 2020 (SATISFY 2020) Program progressed with policy development, the identification of transportation improvements, traffic modeling, cost estimates, fee scenarios and a draft Implementation Agreement. In May 2000, Riverside County Supervisor Tavaglione initiated discussions in the northwest area of Western Riverside County to determine the level of interest in developing a TUMF for that area of the county. Interest in the development of a northwest area fee program was high. In August 2000, the WRCOG Executive Committee took action to build upon the work completed in the southwest area for the SATISFY 2020 program and to develop a single consolidated mitigation fee program for all of Western Riverside County. This action was predicated on the desire to establish a single uniform mitigation fee program to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the regional arterial highway system, rather than multiple discrete and disparate fee programs with varying policies, fees and improvement projects. A TUMF Policy Committee comprising regional elected officials was formed to recommend and set policies for staff to develop the TUMF Program and provide overall guidance to all other staff committees. While the TUMF cannot fund all necessary transportation system improvements, it is intended to address a current transportation funding shortfall by establishing a new revenue source that ensures future new development will contribute toward addressing its indirect cumulative traffic impacts on regional transportation infrastructure. Funding accumulated through the TUMF Program will be used to construct transportation improvements such as new arterial highway lanes, reconfigured freeway interchanges, railroad grade separations and new regional express bus services that will be needed to accommodate future travel demand in Western Riverside County. By levying a fee on new developments in the region, local agencies will be establishing a mechanism by which developers and in turn new county residents and employees will effectively contribute their "fair share" toward sustaining the regional transportation system. This TUMF Nexus Study is intended to satisfy the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 5 Section 66000-66008 Fees for Development Projects (also known as California Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) or the Mitigation Fee Act), which governs imposing development impact fees in California. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all local agencies in California, including cities, counties, and special districts follow two basic rules when instituting impact fees. These rules are as follows: 1) Establish a nexus or reasonable relationship between the development impact fee's use and the type of project for which the fee is required. 2) The fee must not exceed the project's proportional "fair share" of the proposed improvement and cannot be used to correct current problems or to make improvements for existing development. 1.2 TUMF Nexus Study History The TUMF Program is implemented through the auspices of WRCOG. As the council of governments for Western Riverside County, WRCOG provides a forum for WRCOG 2 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 representatives from 18 cities, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Eastern and Western Municipal Water Districts, the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, the March Joint Powers Authority, the Riverside Transit Agency and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians to collaborate on issues that affect the entire subregion, such as air quality, solid waste, transportation and the environment. A current list of the standing WRCOG TUMF related committees and committee membership is included in Appendix A. The initial WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study was completed in October 2002 and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in November 2002. Its purpose was to establish the nexus or reasonable relationship between new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the proposed development impact fee that would be used to improve regional transportation facilities. It also identified the proportional "fair share" of the improvement cost attributable to new development. Consistent with the provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act, the WRCOG Executive Committee has established that the TUMF Nexus Study will be subject of a comprehensive review of the underlying program assumptions at least every five years to confirm the Nexus. Acknowledging the unprecedented and unique nature of the TUMF Program, the Executive Committee determined that the first comprehensive review of the Program should be initiated within two years of initial adoption of the Program primarily to validate the findings and recommendations of the study and to correct any program oversights. The results of the first review of the Program were documented in the TUMF Nexus Study 2005 Update adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on February 6, 2006. A second comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2008 and 2009 in part to address the impacts of the economic recession on the rate of development within the region and on transportation project costs. The findings of the 2009 review of the program were adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on October 5, 2009. A third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2014 and 2015 leading to a Draft Nexus Study document being distributed for review in August 2015. The WRCOG Executive Committee subsequently considered comments related to the Draft Nexus Study 2015 Update at the meeting held on September 14, 2015 where it was resolved to "delay finalizing the Nexus Study for the TUMF Program Update until the 2016 Southern California Association of Governments' 2016 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy growth forecast is available for inclusion in the Nexus Study". The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2016- 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) on April 7, 2016 enabling WRCOG staff to proceed with finalizing the update of the TUMF Nexus Study. This version of the WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study Report documents the final results of the third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program to incorporate the revisions completed during 2016. The findings of this report were ultimately adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 10, 2017. To ensure new development continues to contribute a fair share of the cost to mitigate its cumulative regional transportation impacts in the period between the comprehensive review of program assumptions completed at least every five years, the WRCOG 3 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 WRCOG Executive Committee has also established that the TUMF Schedule of Fees will be reviewed annually, and adjusted, as needed, on July 1st to reflect current costs. The revised schedule of fees will be recalculated in February of each year based on the percentage increase or decrease in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the twelve (12) month period from January of the prior year to January of the current year, and the percentage increase or decrease in the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Median Sales Price of Existing Single Family Homes in the Riverside/San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area for the twelve (12) month period from the 3rd Quarter of the second year prior to the 3rd Quarter of the prior year (to coincide with the publication of the most recently updated index). If approved by the Executive Committee, the resultant percentage change for each of the indices will be applied to the unit cost assumptions for roadway and bus transit costs, and land acquisition costs, respectively, to reflect the combined effects of changes in eligible project costs on the resultant per unit fee for each defined land use category. 1.3 TUMF Nexus Study Process In coordination with WRCOG, city and county representatives, developers, and other interested parties reviewed and updated the underlying assumptions of the Nexus Study as part of this comprehensive program review. In particular, the most recent socioeconomic forecasts developed by SCAG as the basis for the 2016 RTP/SCS were incorporated, as resolved by the WRCOG Executive Committee at the September 14, 2015 meeting. This use of the most recent SCAG forecasts resulted in a shift of the program base year from 2007 to 2012, as well as a shift in the program horizon year from 2035 to 2040. Furthermore, the TUMF Network was re-examined in detail based on travel demand forecasts derived from the most recent version of the Riverside County Transportation and Analysis Model (RivTAM) to more accurately reflect future project needs to address the cumulative regional impacts of new development in Western Riverside County as well as eliminating those projects having been completed prior to the commencement of the Nexus review in 2016. The subsequent chapters of this Nexus Study document describe the various assumptions, data inputs and analysis leading to the determination of each major variable in the TUMF calculation, and ultimately leading to the determination of the TUMF Schedule of Fees that indicates the maximum "fair share" fee for each of the various use types defined in the TUMF program. The overall process for establishing the TUMF nexus is summarized in this section, including the flow chart in Figure 1.1 that illustrates the various technical steps in this fee calculation process. Each technical step that was followed to determine the TUMF Schedule of Fees and establish the program nexus is summarized below, with the numbers denoted on the flow chart correlating to the steps described. The flow chart also incorporates color coding of the steps to indicate those steps that involved the application of RivTAM, steps that utilized other input data, steps that are computations of various inputs, and steps that required specific actions of the various WRCOG committees to confirm major variables. Where appropriate, the flow chart also includes specific cross references to the sections or tables included in this Nexus Study document that correlate to the particular step. WRCOG 4 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Figure 1.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process 0 SCAR Data on 2012 tearririsll Ern pfni-.nt 40 -rows TUMF Road Protect List 0 SCW Fcfse tt lot TINTO lum6 Dissmccere TUMF WS Ai l LRawDirmI stmtDukkiamPlertkadaSs We 1411=4 ---f otTUIFF Prefer.. } Residential Fee Calculation (Table 6.1 & Appendix Ip 0 Alt/14b Ma. 111nisormel TFaanAttedou oFsepIConti Aee1ONw pan•-•. Or C6 4b1 1111H! Me. Uniepte .1 6VISFo.rr1 MF f IRnR Gti"C.Ii Ss0. MFD 1 'Ens In !IM Mad PtoieCt Eslunates now Simdrif 0OCCUR las OntelnietKin (i) / IIPIKRNPD MOW&I) I TUMF Transit Component CY Stunoleot Oats AmBuapOk to SR) 6 MFD I } COSew el CA17 ICFmrlSa s, PvtiTx Situ, Fon par DU Feepor SF >o� Fve CMnietisi 1,d6o5 ItdotraNc H serer prodm broad T ino•ani,ash IT I n.:,,d„y lrW u., -..vr u max., Ram by'Sftliat (LI h11 LAI Ns* L l i. n1.MT+� �i1 Cro"uekY-Ii L Non-Residential Fee Calculation (Table 6.2 &Appendix L) Riverside & SB TUN% CCO,STP!IT (MN 1yr RrefalEv iXioN I Gmeetel Ulm RO11; ei,Cct9a»od b,l 0— e'a11An10kF Me 4YtiOr.-SIdo1., KEY ®Reference to Description in Text 011ier Inputs li Collpumbn .t.. bmf kr Rowdd i.e. AdW1kn pw Iks WRCOG 5 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 1.1.1. Establish the TUMF Network Project List The roadway network in Western Riverside County must be evaluated to determine how new development activity will impact the performance of the network, and how the resultant traffic impacts can be mitigated by completing various roadway improvements. The following steps integrate the latest SCAG socio-economic forecasts into RivTAM as the basis for determining future roadway deficiencies and identifying the list of eligible improvements to address these future deficiencies. The rational and methodology for accomplishing these steps is further explained in Chapters 2 and 3 of this report, with the resultant TUMF Network described in Chapter 4. 1) The SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS was developed using housing and employment data for 2012 as its base year. This officially -adopted dataset was updated for the base for the TUMF 2016 Nexus Update, including redistribution of the SCAG data to correspond to the RivTAM TAZ structure. 2) The RivTAM model1 has datasets available that represent the capacity of the different facilities in the road network for several different study years. For this nexus update, the RivTAM 2012 base network that was developed following the adoption of the SCAG 2012 RTP was selected as the one most closely resembling current conditions. This network was subsequently reviewed and updated, including a detailed review by WRCOG and participating jurisdictions, as well as partner entities, including BIA, to identify projects that were completed on the arterial network in the period between 2012 and December 2015. The arterial network was then recoded to reflect the changes to the TUMF Network to create a 2015 existing network as the basis for analysis. 3) RivTAM was run using the 2012 socio-economic data (SED) and the 2015 road network to produce the baseline volumes on the roads in the TUMF Network. 4) The baseline volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio was then determined. The target LOS for TUMF facilities is "D", meaning that facilities with LOS "E" or "F", i.e. those with a V/C ratio of 0.9 or higher, are deemed to have inadequate capacity. The result of this step is a list of roads that have existing capacity deficiencies. 5) The SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS was developed using housing and employment data for 2040 as its forecast horizon year. This officially -adopted dataset was also used as the future base year for the TUMF update calculation. 6) RivTAM was run using the arterial road network for 2015 with the land use assumptions for 2040. This "No Build" scenario was used to determine where 1 The macro -level traffic forecasting was conducted using the Riverside County Transportation and Analysis Model (RivTAM). RivTAM is a version of SCAG's six -county model with additional detail (traffic analysis zones and local roads) added within Riverside County. It was developed for use in traffic studies in Riverside County as a replacement for several older models that covered different portions of the county. RivTAM has both the geographic scope needed to analyze all TUMF facilities and conformity with regional planning assumptions. There is a memorandum of understanding among the jurisdictions of Riverside County that encourages the use of the RivTAM model for use in traffic studies. WRCOG 6 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 deficiencies would occur in the roadway system if development occurred as expected but no roadway improvements were implemented. 7) Comparing the existing capacity deficiencies with the future deficiencies showed where new deficiencies would occur that are entirely attributable to new development. Comparing the existing and future traffic volume to capacity ratio on the roads that are currently deficient shows the portion of the future deficiency that is attributable to new development. 8) It is generally acknowledged that the TUMF program cannot and should not attempt to fund every roadway improvement needed in Western Riverside County. WRCOG has adopted a set of selection criteria that was used to choose which roadway improvements would be eligible for TUMF funding. 9) The selection criteria were applied to the forecast deficiencies to identify projects for the TUMF Project List. The project list was subsequently reviewed to confirm the eligibility of proposed projects, including projects previously included in the TUMF program, as well as additional projects requested for inclusion as part of the current update. The project list was then subsequently updated to reflect those projects considered eligible for TUMF funding as part of the 2016 Nexus. 1.1.2. Determine the TUMF Network Project Costs The estimated costs of proposed improvements on the TUMF Network are calculated based on the prices of construction materials, labor and land values for the various eligible project types included as part of the TUMF program. The approach and outcomes of the following steps is described in Chapter 4 of this report. 10) The TUMF program has design standards covering the road project components that are eligible for TUMF funding. This ensures that projects in jurisdictions with different design standards are treated equally2. 11) The unit costs for the various construction components were updated based on the current cost values for labor and materials such as cement, asphalt, reinforcing steel, etc., as derived from Caltrans cost database, RCTC and other sources, effective March 2016. Additionally, the ROW cost components per square foot for various land use types were also updated based on current property valuations in Riverside County as researched by Overland, Pacific and Cutler in March 2016. 12) The design standards and the unit costs were combined to create conceptual engineering cost estimates for different eligible project types (road costs per lane -mile, typical costs per arterial -freeway interchange, bridge costs per linear foot, etc.). The unit costs from the previous step were then applied to the project list to estimate the costs of the improvements on the TUMF project list. 2 A jurisdiction may choose to design to a higher standard, but if it does so TUMF will only fund up to the equivalent of what costs would have been had the TUMF design standards been followed. WRCOG 7 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 13) The percentage of each project that was attributable to new development was then applied to the costs of TUMF road projects to find the total road project cost that is attributable to new development. 1.1.3. Determine the TUMF Transit Component A portion of the TUMF funding is made available for transit services that provide an alternative to car travel for medium -to -long distance intra -regional trips. The eligible transit projects and their associated costs are determined using the following steps, with additional explanation provided in Chapter 4 of this report. 14) The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) commissioned a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) that was completed in January 2015. This analysis looked at existing and future ridership and identified potential projects to expand and improve transit service in Riverside County. 15) The COA's ridership figures for 2015 and 2025 were extrapolated to 2012 and 2040 to match the analysis years used for TUMF road projects. 16) The growth in ridership between 2012 and 2040 was compared to total ridership in 2040 to determine the portion of 2040 ridership that is attributable to existing passengers and the portion attributable to new growth. 17) As was the case for road improvements, possible transit projects from the COA were screened using a set of criteria to determine whether they should receive TUMF funding. The COA project list was then reviewed by WRCOG and RTA staff to confirm the validity of the project list and to reflect any changes in RTA project recommendations established since the adoption of the COA to establish a final recommended transit project list to be included as part of the program. The result was the TUMF Transit Project List. 18) RTA provided information on current costs for transit infrastructure. 19) The cost information was then used to determine the cost of the items on the TUMF Transit Project List. 20) The percent attribution from Step 21 was applied to the project cost estimates from Step 24 to determine the cost of transit improvements that are attributable to new development. 21) The costs for road and transit projects that are attributable to new development are then combined along with information on other (non-TUMF) funds to determine the total cost for TUMF projects that is to be cover by new development through the imposition of the fees. The available alternate funding sources were reviewed as part of the Nexus update, specifically including the completion of a detailed review of available federal, state and local funding sources administered by RCTC. 1.1.4. Computing the Fee for Residential Developments Having determined the total project costs to be covered by new development under the TUMF program, it is necessary to divide these costs among different types of WRCOG 8 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 developments roughly in proportion to their expected traffic impacts. The following steps described the process for determining the proportion attributable to new residential development. These approach for accomplishing these steps along with the findings of this analysis are described in detail in Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of this report. 22) California legislation encourages the use of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the primary indicator of traffic impacts because it takes into account both to the number of vehicle trips and the average length of those trips to reflect the proportional impact to the roadway network. As a result, the methodology for determining the relative distribution of traffic impacts between residential and non-residential uses for the purposes of TUMF was revised from a trip based approach used in the earlier nexus studies to a VMT based approach for the 2016 update. The RivTAM 2012 existing and 2040 no -build model runs were examined to determine the VMT of various trip types that would take place in Western Riverside County (excluding through trips). The results were compared to determine the growth in VMT for each trip type. Per WRCOG policy (based on National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) recommended practice) trips originating in or destined for a home are attributed to residential development while trips where neither the origin nor the destination are a home are attributed to non-residential development. 23) The SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS socio-economic forecasts were used to estimate the number of single-family and multi -family dwelling units that will be developed during the 2012 to 2040 period. 24) The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE's) trip generation rates, which come from surveys of existing sites for various development types, were then used to estimate the daily number of trips that will be generated by future single- and multi -family developments that will occur in the region from 2012 to 2040. 25) The cost to be covered by residential development was divided into the portion attributable to new single-family dwellings and portion attributable to new multi- family development to calculate the cost share for each use. 26) The cost share for single-family dwellings and multi -family dwellings was divided by the number of dwellings of each type to determine the fee level required from each new dwelling unit to cover their fair share of the cost to mitigate the impacts of new developments. 1.1.5. Computing the Fee for Non -Residential Developments A process similar to that used for residential units was used to determine the fee level for non-residential development. However, the determination of fees for non-residential development involves additional steps due to the additional complexity of accounting for a greater variety of development types within each use category. Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of this report provide additional explanation regarding the methodology for accomplishing these steps along with the results of this analysis. 27) Like most impact fee programs, TUMF groups similar development projects together into general use categories in order to simplify the administration of the program. TUMF groups the various land use categories found in ITE's Trip WRCOG 9 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Generation Manual into four non-residential categories (industrial, retail, service, and government/public sector) based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), which is also used by the U.S. Census Bureau and SCAG for demographic classifications, and is the basis for such classifications in the SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model as well as and the RivTAM model. The ITE trip generation rates for all uses were reviewed for accuracy updated to reflect the most current ITE published rates. The median value for the trip - generation rates for all uses within each category was used in the nexus study to represent the trip -generation characteristics for the category as a whole. 28) The trip -generation rates of retail uses and service uses were adjusted to take into account the share of pass -by trips these uses generate. Pass by trip rates for various retail and service uses were derived from the ITE Trip Generation Manual to determine the median value of all uses as the basis for the adjustment. The ITE pass by trip rates for all uses were reviewed for accuracy and updated to reflect the most current ITE published rates. 29) The SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS socio economic forecasts included non-residential employment for 2012 and 2040. These forecasts were used to estimate the growth in employment in each of the four non-residential uses. 30) The SCAG employment forecasts are denominated in jobs while development applications are typically denominated in square feet of floorspace. The ratio of floorspace per employee was determined as a median value derived from four studies, including a comprehensive study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties conducted in 1990, an OCTA study conducted in 2001, a SCAG study (including a specific focus on Riverside County) conducted in 2001, and the Riverside County General Plan adopted in 2015. It should be noted the SCAG study and Riverside County General Plan were identified and included as part of the 2016 Nexus Update in response to a recommendation made during the review of the prior draft 2015 Nexus Study. 31) The forecast growth in employees was multiplied by the floorspace per employee to produce a forecast of the floorspace that will be developed for each of the four non-residential use types. 32) The trip -generation rate for each of the four uses was multiplied by the forecast of new floorspace to estimate the number of trips generated by each use. 33) The amount of project costs to be covered by non-residential development was split between the four non-residential uses to determine the TUMF cast share for each. 34) The TUMF cost share for each of the four non-residential uses was divided by the forecast growth in floorspace to determine the fee level required from each new square foot of non-residential development to cover their fair share of the cost to mitigate the impacts of new developments. 35) WRCOG has adopted a TUMF Fee Calculation Handbook that allows for fee adjustments to be made to account for unusual circumstances for certain types of residential and non-residential development (fuel filling stations, golf courses, high -cube warehouses, wineries, electric charging stations, etc.) These WRCOG 10 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 adjustments are intended to calculate a fairer proportional fee based on the unique trip generation characteristics of these particular development types. The outcome of this process is a schedule of fees for the various use categories identified as part of the TUMF program. The study conclusions including the Schedule of Fees is presented in Chapter 7 of this report. The schedule of fees represents the maximum fee permissible under California law for the purposes of the TUMF program. The WRCOG Executive Committee has the option to adopt lower fees, however, in doing so each use category subject to a lower fee would not be contributing a fair share of the cost of their impacts. This would in turn create a funding gap for the program that would necessitate identifying additional project funding from some other source in order to ensure the cumulative regional impacts of new development are being mitigated fully in accordance with the program. WRCOG 11 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 2.0 FUTURE GROWTH 2.1 Recent Historical Trend Western Riverside County experienced robust growth in the period from the late 1990's to the mid 2000's. The results of Census 2000 indicate that in the year 2000, Western Riverside County had a population of 1.187 million representing a 30% increase (or 2.7% average annual increase) from the 1990 population of 912,000. Total employment in Western Riverside County in 2000 was estimated by the SCAG to be 381,000 representing a 46% increase (or 3.9% average annual increase) over the 1990 employment of 261,000. Despite the impacts of the Great Recession and the associated residential mortgage and foreclosure crisis, Western Riverside County continued to grow due to the availability of relatively affordable residential and commercial property, and a generally well-educated workforce. By 2010, the population of the region had grown to 1.742 million, a further 47% growth in population from 2000. Similarly, total employment in the region had also grown from 2000 to 2010 with 434,000 employees estimated to be working in Western Riverside County. This represents a 12% increase from the 381,000 employees working in the region in 2000. 2.2 Available Demographic Data A variety of alternate demographic information that quantifies future population, household and employment growth is available for Western Riverside County. For earlier versions of the TUMF Nexus Study, the primary available source of consolidated demographic information for Western Riverside County was provided by SCAG. SCAG is the largest of nearly 700 Councils of Government (COG) in the United States and functions as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for six counties in Southern California including Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura and Imperial. SCAG is mandated by the federal government to research and plan for issues of regional significance including transportation and growth management. As part of these responsibilities, SCAG maintains a comprehensive database of regional socioeconomic data and develops demographic projections and travel demand forecasts for Southern California. Recognizing the need to develop a more comprehensive source of socioeconomic data for Riverside County, the Riverside County Center for Demographic Research (RCCDR) was established under the joint efforts of the County of Riverside, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, and the University of California, Riverside in 2005. RCCDR was responsible for establishing and maintaining demographic information and ensuring data consistency through a centralized data source of demographic characteristics. RCCDR provided demographic estimates and forecasts for Riverside County as input to the SCAG regional forecasts as well as providing the demographic basis for RivTAM. RCCDR forecasts were utilized as the basis for the TUMF Nexus Study 2009 Update. WRCOG 12 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 The functions of the RCCDR have been subsequently integrated into the Riverside County Information Technology - Geographic Information Systems (RCIT-GIS) group, and their role in the development and distribution of SED has recently diminished. Although RCIT-GIS, WRCOG and other regional partners participated in the process to develop regional demographic forecasts as part of the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS, SCAG remained the lead agency in the compilation and dissemination of the forecasts that were ultimately adopted in 2016, including those specific to Western Riverside County. For this reason, the SCAG forecasts adopted for the 2016 RTP/SCS were used as the basis for the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update, with the adopted SCAG data being disaggregated to correlate to the traffic analysis zone (TAZ) structure utilized for RivTAM. 2.3 Demographic Assumptions Used for the Nexus Study Analysis A major distinction between RCCDR data used for the TUMF Nexus Study 2009 Update and the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS data used for this 2016 Update is the change in the base year from 2007 to 2012, as well as the change in the horizon year from 2035 to 2040. This shift in the base year and horizon year demographic assumptions of the program carries through all aspects of the nexus analysis, including the travel demand forecasting, network review and fee calculation. The SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS data were compared to the RCCDR 2007 data used in the TUMF Nexus Study 2009 Update. As can be seen in Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1, the 2012 data reflects a modest increase in population, a very slight decline in households, and a modest decline in overall employment, with a notable shift in employment away from industry and government/public sector to retail. These changes reflect a restructuring of the regional economy in response to the influences of the Great Recession during this time. Table 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County SED Type 2009 Update (2007) 2016 Update (2012) Change Percent Total Population 1,569,393 1,773,935 204,542 13% Total Households 530,289 525,149 -5,140 -1% Single -Family 395,409 366,588 -28,821 -7% Multi -Family 134.880 158.561 23,681 18% Total Employment 515,914 460,787 -55,127 -11% Industrial 175,571 120,736 -54,835 -31% Retail 39,576 65,888 26.312 66% Service 256.813 253.372 -3.441 - I% Government/Public Sector 43.954 20.791 -23.163 -53% Source: Riverside County CDR, May 2008; SCAG 2016 RTP; WSP, April 2016 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 13 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Figure 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County 1,800,000 1,600,000 I ,400,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 175,571 L 256:813 Household Type: O Single -Family EE Multi -Family Employment Sectors: D Industrial ® Retail ® Service • Government Table 2.2 and Figure 2.2 compare the socioeconomic forecasts for the program horizon year of 2035 used in the TUMF Nexus Study 2009 Update and 2040 for this study. The most recent forecasts reflect a reduction in the horizon year population, households and overall employment in Western Riverside County, as well as shifts in the projected growth in employment sectors away from government/public sector and service towards retail. These changes are considered to be consistent with the influence of the economic recession on the rate of growth in Western Riverside County. WRCOG 14 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Table 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County SED Type 2009 Update (2035) 2016 Update (2040) Change Percent Total Population 2,537,583 2,429,633 -107,950 -4% Total Households 881.968 775,231 -106,737 -12% Single -Family 552,154 539.631 -12,523 -2% Multi -Family _ 329.814 235,600 � -94,214 -29% Total Employment 1,090,833 861,455 -229,378 -21% TUMF Industrial 276,782 201,328 -75,454 -27% TUMF Retail 87,170 101,729 14,559 17% TUMF Service 595.039 528.092 , -66,947 -11% TUMF Government/Public Sector 131,842 30,306 -101,536 j -77% Source: Riverside County CDR, May 2008; SCAG 2016 RTP; WSP, April 2016 Figure 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ,537,583 500,000 2.429.633 276,782 1 552,154 539,631 329:8'i4.y35,„'--- '600 595,039 201,328 _ 131.842 r9 oA ° ops 528.092 Household Type: o Single -Family ® Multi -Family Employment Sectors: O lndustrial O Retail OService O Government WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 15 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Table 2.3 and Figure 2.3 summarize the socioeconomic data obtained from SCAG and used as the basis for completing this Nexus Study analysis. The SCAG employment data for 2012 and 2040 was provided for thirteen employment sectors consistent with the California Employment Development Department (EDD) Major Groups including: Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Retail Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities; Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service; and Government. For the purposes of the Nexus Study, the EDD Major Groups were aggregated to Industrial (Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities), Retail (Retail Trade), Service (Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service) and Government/Public Sector (Government). These four aggregated sector types were used as the basis for calculating the fee as described in Section 6.2. Appendix B provides a table detailing the EDD Major Groups and corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Categories that are included in each non- residential sector type. Table 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2012 to 2040) SED Type 2012 2040 Change Percent Total Population 1,773,935 2,429,633 655,698 37% Total Households 525,149 775,231 250,082 48% Single -Family 366.588 539.631 173,043 47% Multi -Family 158,561 235.600 77,039 49% Total Employment 460,787 861,455 400,668 87% TUMF Industrial 120,736 201,328 80,592 67% TUMF Retail 65,888 101,729 35,841 54% TUMF Service 253,372 528,092 274.720 108% TUMF Government/Public Sector 20,791 30,306 9,515 46% Source: SCAG 2016 RTP; WSP, April 2016 WRCOG 16 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Figure 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2012 to 2040) 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 ?,429.633 .773.935 Qat' o J\ow�o (10 201,328 �401�724 • 120.736 528,092 253.372 1 Household Type: ❑ Single -Family 13 Multi -Family Employment Sector: o Industrial 11 Retail QService n Government The combined effects of the changes in the base year and horizon year socioeconomic data is a notable reduction in the total growth in population, households and employment for the current Nexus Update compared to the 2009 Nexus Update. Table 2.4 and Figure 2.4 provide a comparison of the changes in population, households and employment between the 2016 Nexus Update and the 2009 Nexus Update. The table and figure clearly illustrate the reduction in the rate of growth in Western Riverside County largely attributable to the effects of the economic recession. This reduced rate of growth in the region will serve as the basis for reevaluating the level of impact of new development on the transportation system in the next section, as well as providing the basis for the determination of the fair share fee for each land use type. WRCOG 17 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Table 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) SED Type 2009 Update (2007-2035) 2015 Update (2012-2040) Difference Percent Total Population 968,190 655,698 -312,492 -32% Total Households 351,679 250,082 -101,597 -29% Single -Family 156,745 173,043 16,298 10% Multi -Family 194,934 77,039 -117,895 =60% Total Employment 574,919 400,668 -174,251 -30% TUMF Industrial 101,211 80,592 -20,619 -20% TUMF Retail 47,594 35.841 -1 1153 -25% TUMF Service 338,226 274.720 -63,506 -19% TUMF Government/Public Sector 87.888 9,515 -78,373 -89% Source: Riverside County CDR, May 2008; SCAG 2016 RTP; WSP, April 2016 Figure 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 101,211 '17.594 156,745. _ ‘461- • tiQ 338,226 87,888 l 03- rbc* Fo- 80,592 3510 274.720 Household Type: ❑ Single -Family ▪ Multi -Family Employment Sector: o Industrial o Retail ❑ Service 3 Government WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 18 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 3.0 NEED FOR THE TUMF All new development has some effect on the transportation infrastructure in a community, city or county due to an increase in travel demand. Increasing usage of the transportation facilities leads to more traffic, progressively increasing VMT, traffic congestion and decreasing the level of service (LOS)3. In order to meet the increased travel demand and keep traffic flowing, improvements to transportation facilities become necessary to sustain pre -development traffic conditions. The projected growth in Western Riverside County (37% growth in population and 87% growth in employment in under 30 years) and the related growth in VMT can be expected to significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in the transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial highways and roadways that carry a significant number of the trips between cities, since traditional sources of transportation improvement funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the improvements needed to serve new development. Development exactions generally provide only a fraction of the improvements with improvements confined to the area immediately adjacent to the respective development, and the broad-based county -level funding sources (i.e., Riverside County's half -cent sales tax known as Measure A) designate only a small portion of their revenues for arterial roadway improvements. This section documents the existing and future congestion levels that demonstrate the need for future improvements to the transportation system to specifically mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development. It then describes the TUMF concept that has been developed to fund future new developments' fair share of needed improvements. The forecast of future congestion levels is derived from Year 2040 No -Build travel demand forecasts for Western Riverside County developed using RivTAM. The Year 2040 No -Build scenario evaluates the effects of 2040 population, employment and resultant traffic generation on the 2015 existing arterial highway network. 3.1 Future Highway Congestion Levels To support the evaluation of the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the existing arterial highway system in Western Riverside County, existing (2012) and 3 The Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp 2-2, 2-3) describes LOS as a "quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience." Letters are used to designate each of six LOS (A to F), with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F representing the worst. According to the Highway Capacity Manual, LOS C or D is typically used in planning efforts to ensure an acceptable operating service for facility users. Therefore, LOS E represents the threshold for unacceptable LOS. WRCOG 19 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 future (2040) SED were modeled on the existing (2015) arterial highway network using RivTAM. To quantify traffic growth impacts, various traffic measures of effectiveness were calculated for the AM and PM peak periods for each of the two scenarios. The WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from the greater regional model network for the purpose of calculating measures for Western Riverside County only. Peak period performance measures for the Western Riverside County TUMF study area included total VMT, total vehicle hours of travel (VHT), total combined vehicle hours of delay (VHD), and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E). These results were tabulated in Table 3.1. Plots of the Network Extents are attached in Appendix C. Total Arterial VMT, VHT, VHD and LOS E Threshold VMT were calculated to include all principal arterials, minor arterials and major connectors, respectively. Regional values for each threshold were calculated for a total of all facilities including arterials, freeways, freeway ramps and High -Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes. Table 3.1 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2012 Baseline to 2040 No -Build) Measure of Performance* Peak Periods (Total) 2012 2040 % Change % Annual VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 19,532,437 29,277,587 50% 1.5% VMT - FREEWAYS 11,019,155 14,487,570 31% 1.0% VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 8,513,282 14,790,016 74% 2.0% TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 5,585,202 9,089,495 63% 1.8% VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 575,154 1,361,907 137% 3.1% VHT - FREEWAYS 296,542 736,433 148% 3.3% VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 278,611 625,474 124% 2.9% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 181,151 396,981 119% 2.8% VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 175,765 739,075 320% 5.3% VHD - FREEWAYS 117,430 502,549 328% 5.3% VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 58,334 236,527 305% 5.1% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 45,080 172,944 284% 4.9% VMT LOS E - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 6,188,644 16,966,992 174% 3.7% VMT LOS E - FREEWAYS 4,532,703 10,156,363 124% 2.9% VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 1,655,941 6,810,629 31 1% 5.2% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 1,462,061 5,160,911 253% 4.6% % of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 26% 57% * Based on RivTAM 2012 network provided by Riverside County Transportation Department and SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2015 arterial network completed by WSP, September 2016. NOTES: Volume is adjusted by PCE factor VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free-flow (ideal) travel time) LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios). LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan. WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 20 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 The following formulas were used to calculate the respective values: VMT = Link Distance * Total Daily Volume VHT = Average Loaded (Congested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume VHD = VHT - (Free-flow (Uncongested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume) VMT LOS E or F = VMT (on links where Daily V/C exceeded 0.90) Note: Volume to capacity (v/c) ratio thresholds for LOS E are based on the Transportation Research Board 2010 Edition of the t•iiuhwav Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) LOS Maximum V/C Criteria for Multilane Highways with 45 mph Free Flow Speed (Exhibit 14-5, Chapter 14, Page 14-5). The calculated values were compared to assess the total change between 2012 Baseline and 2040 No -Build, and the average annual change between 2012 Baseline and 2040 No -Build. As can be seen from the RivTAM outputs summarized in Table 3.1, the additional traffic generated by new development will cause VMT on the arterial highway network to increase by approximately 74% by the year 2040 (approximately 2.0% per year). In the absence of additional improvements to the transportation network in Western Riverside County, the growth in VMT will cause congestion on the highway system to increase almost exponentially, with the most significant increase in congestion observed on the arterial highway system that includes the TUMF Network. Many facilities will experience a significant increase in vehicle delay and deterioration in LOS to unacceptable levels as a result of new development and the associated growth in traffic. According to the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2010), LOS C or D are required to "ensure an acceptable operating service for facility users." LOS E is generally recognized to represent the threshold of unacceptable operating service and the onset of substantial systemic traffic congestion. The Congestion Management Program for Riverside County (CMP) published by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) in 2011 designates LOS E as the "traffic standards must be set no lower than LOS E for any segment or intersection along the CMP System of Highways and Roadways" in Riverside County. "The intent of the CMP is to more directly link land use, transportation, and air quality, thereby prompting reasonable growth management programs that will effectively utilize new transportation funds, alleviate traffic congestion and related impacts, and improve air quality." 4 The CMP provides a mechanism for monitoring congestion on the highway system and, where congestion is observed, establishes procedures for developing a deficiency plan to address improvement needs. The reactive nature of the CMP to identify and remediate existing congestion differs from the proactive nature of the TUMF program to anticipate and provide for future traffic needs. For this reason, the TUMF program follows the guidance of the Highway Capacity Manual in establishing LOS E as the threshold for unacceptable level of service, and subsequently as the basis for measuring system performance and accounting for existing needs. This approach ensures a more conservative accounting of existing system needs as part of the 4 Congestion Management Program for Riverside County - Executive Summary (Riverside County Transportation Commission, 201 1) Page ES -3, ES -1 WRCOG 21 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 determination of the "fair share" of mitigating the cumulative regional impacts of future new development on the transportation system. The continuing need for a mitigation fee on new development is shown by the adverse impact that new development will have on Western Riverside County's transportation infrastructure, and in particular, the arterial highway network. As a result of the new development and associated growth in population and employment in Western Riverside County, additional pressure will be placed on the transportation infrastructure with the total VMT on the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials (RSHA; also referred to as the TUMF Network) estimated to increase by approximately 63% or 1.8% compounded annually. As shown in Table 3.1, the VMT on arterial facilities within the TUMF Network experiencing LOS of E or worse will increase by approximately 253% or 4.6% compounded annually in Western Riverside County in the period between 2012 and 2040. By 2040, 57% of the total VMT on the TUMF arterial highway system is forecast to be traveling on facilities experiencing daily LOS E or worse. Without improvements to the TUMF arterial highway system, the total vehicle hours of delay (VHD) experienced by area motorists on TUMF arterial highways will increase by approximately 4.9% per year. The combined influences of increased travel demand and worsened LOS that manifest themselves in severe congestion and delay highlight the continuing need to complete substantial capacity expansion on the TUMF arterial highway system to mitigate the cumulative regional impact of new development. The RivTAM outputs summarized in Table 3.1 clearly demonstrate that the travel demands generated by future new development in the region will lead to increasing levels of traffic congestion, especially on the arterial roadways. The need to improve these roadways to accommodate the anticipated growth in VMT and relieve future congestion is therefore directly linked to the future development which generates the additional travel demand. 3.2 Future Transit Utilization Levels In addition to the roadway network, public transportation will play a role in serving future travel demand in the region. Transit represents a critical component of the transportation system by providing an alternative mode choice for those not wanting to use an automobile, and particularly for those who do not readily have access to an automobile. As population and employment in Western Riverside County grows as a result of new development, demand for regional transit services in the region is also expected to grow. While some future transit trips will be accommodated by inter -regional transit services such as Metrolink, a substantial number of the trips within Western Riverside County will be served by bus transit services and for this reason the provision of regional bus transit service is considered integral to addressing the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new developments. Regional bus transit services within Western Riverside County are primarily provided by RTA. To support the evaluation of regional bus service WRCOG 22 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 needs to accommodate new development, daily transit trip forecasts were derived from the RTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis5. Weekday projected system ridership for 2015 and 2025 were interpolated to 2012 and 2040 to represent existing and future transit trips consistent with the analysis of highway trips described in Section 3.1. The interpolated year 2012 and year 2040 existing and future transit ridership were compared in order to assess the impact of new development on transit demand. The weekday projected system ridership indicates that RTA bus transit services accommodate approximately 31,016 riders per day in Western Riverside County in 2015. By 2025, bus transit services are forecast to serve approximately 46,572 riders per weekday. This represents an increase in projected weekday ridership of 15,556 between 2015 and 2025, or an average increase of 1,414 weekday riders each year. Based on these projected weekday ridership levels and rate of ridership growth each year, the interpolated weekday ridership for 2012 is 26,773 while the interpolated weekday ridership for 2040 would be 67,785. This translates into an increase of 41,011 riders per weekday between 2012 and 2040. Weekday projected system ridership for 2015 and 2025, as presented in Table 7 of the RTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis Executive Summary, along with the interpolated weekday system ridership in 2012 and 2040 are included in Appendix D. The significant future growth in demand for public transit services is reflective of the cumulative regional impacts of new development, and the associated increase in demand for all types of transportation infrastructure and services to accommodate this growth. Furthermore, bus transit ridership is expected to grow as the improved services being planned and implemented by RTA attracts new riders and encourages existing riders to use transit more often as an alternative to driving. Attracting additional riders to bus transit services contributes to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development by reducing the number of trips that need to be served on the highway system. The need to provide additional bus transit services within Western Riverside County to satisfy this future demand is therefore directly linked to the future development that generates the demand. 3.3 The TUMF Concept A sizable percentage of trip -making for any given local community extends beyond the bounds of the individual community as residents pursue employment, education, shopping and entertainment opportunities elsewhere. As new development occurs within a particular local community, this migration of trips of all purposes by new residents and the new business that serve them contributes to the need for transportation improvements within their community and in the other communities of Western Riverside County. The idea behind a uniform mitigation fee is to have new development throughout the region contribute uniformly to paying the fair share cost of improving the transportation facilities that serve these longer -distance trips between communities. Thus, the fee is intended to be used primarily to improve transportation 5 Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), Comprehensive Operational Analysis Executive Summary, January 2015, Table 7 WRCOG 23 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 facilities that serve trips between communities within the region (in particular, arterial roadways and regional bus transit services). Some roadways serve trips between adjacent communities, while some also serve trips between more distant communities within the region. The differing roadway functions led to the concept of using a portion of the fee revenues for a backbone system of arterial roadways that serve the longer -distance trips (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the entire region), while using a second portion of the fee revenues for a secondary system of arterials that serve inter -community trips within a specific subregion or zone (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the communities most directly served by these roads - in effect, a return -to -source of that portion of the funds). Reflecting the importance of public transit service in meeting regional travel needs, a third portion of fee revenues was reserved for improvements to regional bus transit services (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the entire region). Much, but not all, of the new trip -making in a given area is generated by residential development (i.e. when people move into new homes, they create new trips on the transportation system as they travel to work, school, shopping or entertainment). Some of the new trips are generated simply by activities associated with new businesses (i.e. new businesses will create new trips through the delivery of goods and services, etc.). With the exception of commute trips by local residents coming to and from work, and the trips of local residents coming to and from new businesses to get goods and services, the travel demands of new businesses are not directly attributable to residential development. The consideration of different sources of new travel demand is therefore reflected in the concept of assessing both residential and non-residential development for their related transportation impacts. In summary, the TUMF concept includes the following: ➢ A uniform fee that is levied on new development throughout Western Riverside County. ➢ The fee is assessed roughly proportionately on new residential and non-residential development based on the relative impact of each new use on the transportation system. > A portion of the fee is used to fund capacity improvements on a backbone system of arterial roadways that serve longer -distance trips within the region; a portion of the fee is returned to the subregion or zone in which it was generated to fund capacity improvements on a secondary system of arterial roadways that link the communities in that area; and a portion of the fee is used to fund improvements to regional bus transit services that serve longer -distance trips between the communities within the region. WRCOG 24 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 4.0 THE TUMF NETWORK 4.1 Identification of the TUMF Roadway Network An integral element of the initial Nexus Study was the designation of the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials. This network of regionally significant highways represents those arterial and collector highway and roadway facilities that primarily support inter -community trips in Western Riverside County and supplement the regional freeway system. As a result, this system also represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The TUMF Network does not include the freeways of Western Riverside County as these facilities primarily serve longer distance inter -regional trips and a significant number of pass-through trips that have no origin or destination in Western Riverside County6. The TUMF Network is the system of roadways that serve inter -community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. The RSHA for Western Riverside County was identified based on several transportation network and performance guidelines as follows: 1. Arterial highway facilities proposed to have a minimum of four lanes at ultimate build -out (not including freeways). 2. Facilities that serve multiple jurisdictions and/or provide connectivity between communities both within and adjoining Western Riverside County. 3. Facilities with forecast traffic volumes in excess of 20,000 vehicles per day in the future horizon year. 4. Facilities with forecast volume to capacity ratio of 0.90 (LOS E) or greater in the future horizon year. 5. Facilities that accommodate regional fixed route transit services. 6. Facilities that provide direct access to major commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational or tourist activity centers, and multi -modal transportation facilities (such as airports, railway terminals and transit centers). Appendix E includes exhibits illustrating the various performance measures assessed during the definition of the RSHA. Transportation facilities in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied the respective guidelines were initially identified, and a skeletal regional transportation framework evolved from facilities where multiple guidelines were observed. Representatives of all WRCOG constituent jurisdictions reviewed this framework in the context of current local transportation plans to define the TUMF Network, which was 6 Since pass -though trips have no origin or destination in Western Riverside County, new development within Western Riverside County cannot be considered responsible for mitigating the impacts of pass through trips. The impact of pass- through trips and the associated cost to mitigate the impact of pass through trips (and other inter -regional freeway trips) is addressed in the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Western Riverside County Freeway Strotecic Pion, Pha e 11— Detailed Evaluation and Impact Fee Nexus Determination Final Report dated May 31, 2008. WRCOG 25 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 subsequently endorsed by the WRCOG Public Works Committee, WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee, TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee. The RSHA is illustrated in Figure 4.1. As stated previously, the RSHA represents those regional significant highway facilities that primarily serve inter -community trips in Western Riverside County and therefore also represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. Consistent with the declining rate of new development forecast for Western Riverside County post the Great Recession, the TUMF Network was reviewed as part of the 2016 Nexus Update to ensure facilities generally still met the previously described performance guidelines, and/or that the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network were roughly proportional to the impacts needing to be mitigated. This review process resulted in the removal of various facilities from the TUMF Network, as well as various changes in the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network are discussed in Section 4.3 of this report. WRCOG 26 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 a Legend TUM1II A. Cour. y Regional System of Highways and Arterials - Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program I Figure 4.1 4.2 Backbone Network and Secondary Network As indicated previously, the TUMF roadway network was refined to distinguish between facilities of "Regional Significance" and facilities of "Zonal Significance." Facilities of Regional Significance were identified as those that typically are proposed to have a minimum of six lanes at general plan build-out7, extend across and/or between multiple Area Planning Districts8, and are forecast to carry at least 25,000 vehicles per day in 2040. The Facilities of Regional Significance have been identified as the "backbone" highway network for Western Riverside County. A portion of the TUMF fee is specifically designated for improvement projects on the backbone system. The backbone network is illustrated in Figure 4.2. Facilities of Zonal Significance (the "secondary" network) represent the balance of the RSHA for Western Riverside County. These facilities are typically within one zone and carry comparatively lesser traffic volumes than the backbone highway network, although they are considered significant for circulation within the respective zone. A portion of the TUMF is specifically designated for improvement projects on the secondary network within the zone in which it is collected. The WRCOG APD or zones are illustrated in Figure 4.3. 7 Although facilities were identified based on the minimum number of lanes anticipated at general plan buildout, in some cases it was determined that sufficient demand for all additional lanes facilities may not exist on some facilities until beyond the current timeframe of the TUMF Program (2040). As a result, only a portion of the additional lanes on these facilities have currently been identified for funding with TUMF revenues, reflecting the cumulative impact of new development through the current duration of the TUMF Program. 8 Area Planning Districts (APD) are the five aggregations of communities used for regional planning functions within the WRCOG area. Area Planning Districts are interchangeably referred to as TUMF Zones. WRCOG 28 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Backbone Network of Highways and Arterials - Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program 1 Figure 4.2 - ■�i f 64 . . an Nliktiteiam Central Zone e-"riballii$111614A-71) 111: Pass Zone -Northwest Zone Legend Ma a..k., InI UM Zone Hou.,iun a 1111111 HernetfSan Jacinto Zone Southwest Zone #1, WRCOG Western Riverside County Area Planning Districts (TUMF Zones) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program 1 Figure 4.3 4.3 Future Roadway Transportation Needs For the purpose of calculating a "fair share" fee for new development, it is necessary to estimate the cost of improvements on the TUMF system that will be needed to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of future transportation demands created by new development. Estimates of the cost to improve the network to mitigate the cumulative impacts of new development were originally developed based on unit costs prepared for the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Regional Arterial Cost Estimate (RACE)9, and the WRCOG Southwest District SATISFY 2020 Summary of Cost Estimates10 (TKC/WRCOG 2000). The RACE cost estimates were developed based on a summary of actual construction costs for projects constructed in Riverside County in 1998. The initial unit cost estimates for the TUMF (based on inflated RACE cost estimates) were reviewed in the context of the SATISFY 2020 Draft Cost Estimates and were consolidated to provide typical improvement costs for each eligible improvement type. The refinement of unit costs was completed to simplify the process of estimating the cost to improve the entire TUMF network. Based on RACE and SATISFY 2020, consolidated cost estimates included typical per mile or lump sum costs for each of the improvement types eligible under the TUMF Program. The resultant revised unit cost estimates were used as the basis for estimating the cost to complete the necessary improvements to the TUMF network to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development. Variations in the consolidated cost estimates for specific improvement types were provided to reflect differences in topography and land use across the region. Unit costs for roadway construction were originally varied to account for variations in construction cost (and in particular, roadway excavation and embankment cost) associated with construction on level (code 1) rolling (code 2) and mountainous (code 3) terrain, respectively. Right-of-way acquisition costs which originally included consideration for land acquisition, documentation and legal fees, relocation and demolition costs, condemnation compensation requirements, utility relocation, and environmental mitigation costs were also varied to account for variations in right-of-way costs associated with urban (developed commercial/residential mixed uses - code 1), suburban (developed residential uses - code 2) and rural (undeveloped uses - code 3) land uses, respectively. Lump sum costs for interchange improvements were originally varied to account for variations in cost associated with new complex, new standard (or fully reconstructed), or major (or partially reconstructed) or minor (individual ramp improvements) interchange improvements. As part of the 2016 TUMF Nexus Update, the original unit cost categories were revised to generate entirely new unit cost values based on the most recent available construction cost, labor cost and land acquisition cost values for comparable projects within 9 Parsons Brinckerhoff/Coachella Valley Association of Governments, 1999, Redlonal Arterial Cost Estimate (RACE) 10 TKC/Western Riverside Council of Governments, 2000, SATISFY 2020 Summary of Cost Estimates WRCOG 31 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Riverside County. The recalculation of the TUMF unit cost components was completed as part of the 2016 Nexus Update to reflect the effects of the ongoing recovery from the economic recession that has seen the costs of materials, labor and land acquisition in California rebound from relative historical lows. Appendix F provides a detailed outline of the assumptions and methodology leading to the revised TUMF unit cost assumptions developed as part of the 2016 Nexus Update. In addition, supplemental categories were added to the cost assumptions to better delineate the need to mitigate the cumulative multi -species habitat impacts of TUMF arterial highway improvements in accordance with the Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and to account for the costs associated with WRCOG administration of the TUMF Program. Section 8.5.1 of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) MSHCP adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003 states that "each new transportation project will contribute to Plan implementation. Historically, these projects have budgeted 3% - 5% of their construction costs to mitigate environmental impacts." This provision is reiterated in the MSHCP Final Mitigation Fee Nexus Report (David Taussig and Associates, Inc., July 1, 2003) section 5.3.1.2 which states that "over the next 25 years, regional infrastructure projects are expected to generate approximately $250 million in funding for the MSHCP" based on mitigation at 5% of construction costs. To clearly demonstrate compliance with the provisions of the MSHCP, the TUMF Program will incorporate a cost element to account for the required MSHCP contribution to mitigate the multi -species habitat impacts of constructing TUMF projects. In accordance with the MSHCP Nexus Report, an amount equal to 5% of the construction cost for new TUMF network lanes, bridges and railroad grade separations will be specifically included as part of TUMF Program with revenues to be provided to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) for the acquisition of land identified in the MSHCP. The relevant sections of the MSHCP document and the MSHCP Nexus Report are included in Appendix F. Table 4.1 summarizes the unit cost estimate assumptions used to develop the TUMF network cost estimate as part of the current Nexus Update. Table 4.1 also includes a comparison of the original TUMF unit cost assumptions, and the 2009 Nexus Update unit cost assumptions. Cost estimates are provided in current year values as indicated. To estimate the cost of improving the regional transportation system to provide for future traffic growth from new development, the transportation network characteristics and performance guidelines (outlined in Section 4.1) were initially used as a basis for determining the needed network improvements. The initial list of improvements needed to provide for the traffic generated by new development was then compared with local General Plan Circulation Elements to ensure that the TUMF network included planned arterial roadways of regional significance. A consolidated list of proposed improvements and the unit cost assumptions were then used to establish an initial estimate of the cost to improve the network to provide for future traffic growth associated with new development. This initial list of proposed improvements has since been revised and updated as part of each subsequent Nexus Update to reflect the changing levels of new development and the associated travel demand and transportation system impacts to be mitigated as part of the TUMF program. WRCOG 32 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 As discussed in Section 2.3, the effects of the economic recession since the 2009 Nexus Update have included a reduction in the rate of forecasted growth in Western Riverside County. As indicated in Table 2.4 and Figure 2.4, the anticipated rate of forecasted growth in Western Riverside County has been reduced overall by 32% for population, 29% for households and 30% for employment. This reduced rate of socioeconomic growth is reflected in a reduction in the forecast horizon year population, households and employment depicted in Table 2.2 and Figure 2.2, with the 2040 forecasts used as the basis for the 2016 Nexus Update being reduced by 4% for population, 12% for households and 21% for employment compared to the 2035 horizon year forecasts used as the basis for the 2009 Nexus Update, despite the horizon year being extended out by 5 years in the most recent SCAG forecasts. This reduced rate of forecasted socioeconomic growth has a commensurate impact on the forecasted daily traffic in the region as demonstrated by the 2009 Nexus Update VMT compared to the 2016 Nexus Update VMT in Table 4.2. As shown in the table, the forecast daily traffic is reduced by about 7% in the year 2040 as the basis for the 2016 Nexus Update compared to the year 2035 as used for the 2009 Nexus Update. As a result of the reduced traffic growth in the region, it is anticipated that the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the arterial highway and transit systems in the region is also reduced necessitating a reduction in the projects identified on the TUMF Network to mitigate the impacts of new development. WRCOG 33 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Table 4.1 - Unit Costs for Arterial Highway and Street Construction Component Type Original Cost Assumptions as published October 18, 2002 Cost Assumptions per 2009 Nexus Update October 5, 2009 Cost Assumptions per 2016 Nexus Update Description Terrain 1 $550,000 $628,000 $692,000 Construction cost per lane mile - level terrain Terrain 2 $850,000 $761,000 $878,000 Construction cost per lane mile - rolling terrain Terrain 3 $1,150,000 $895,000 $1,064,000 Construction cost per lane mile - mountainous terrain Landuse 1 $900,000 $1,682,000 $2,509,000 ROW cost factor per lane mile - urban areas Landuse 2 $420,000 $803,000 $2,263,000 ROW cost factor per lane mile - suburban areas Landuse 3 $240,000 $237,000 5287,000 ROW cost factor per lane mile - rural areas Interchange 1 n/a $43,780,000 550,032,000 Complex new interchange/interchange modification cost Interchange 2 $20,000,000 $22,280,000 525,558,000 total caNew interchange/interchangest modification Interchange 3 $10,000,000 $10,890,000 $12,343,000 Major interchange improvement total cost Bridge 1 $2,000 $2,880 53,180 Bridge total cost per lane per linear foot RRXing 1 $4,500,000 $4,550,000 $6,376,000 New Rail Grade Crossing per lane RRXing 2 $2,250,000 $2,120,000 $2,733,000 Existing Rail Grade Crossing per lane Planning 10% 10% 10% Planning, preliminary engineering and environmental assessment costs based on construction cost only Engineering 25% 25% 25% Project study report, design, permitting and construction oversight costs based on construction cost only Contingency 10% 10% 10% Contingency costs based on total segment cost Administration 3% 4% TUMF program administration based on total TUMF eligible network cost MSHCP 5% 5% TUMF component of MSHCP based on total TUMF eligible construction cost Table 4.2 - Forecasted Daily Traffic in Western Riverside County Measure of Performance 2016 Nexus Update 2009 Nexus Update Daily Daily _ 2012 Baseline 2040 No -Build 2007 2035 VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 36,844,082 56,574,656 39,187,718 60,772,353 VMT - FREEWAYS 21,798,155 30,678,958 24,056,704 32,920,502 VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 15,045,927 25,895,698 15,131,014 27,851,851 TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 10,059,547 16,515,642 Source: Based on RivTAM 2012 network provided by Riverside County Transportation Department and SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2015 arterial network completed by WSP, September 2016; RivTAM provided by Iteris (2008) WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 34 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 A peer review process utilizing real world experience and perspectives from both the private and public sectors was critical in developing a realistic network of proposed improvements to mitigate the additional traffic resulting from future development in Western Riverside County. Representatives of private development firms and the BIA have continued to participate in the process of developing and updating the TUMF Program. This involvement has included active participation of private developer staff at various workshops conducted at critical milestone points in the process of completing the Nexus update, as well as a formal review of the TUMF Network and associated elements of the Nexus Study by the BIA and their hired consultant staff. As part of the 2015 Nexus Update, the list of proposed improvements included in the initial Nexus Study and validated during the subsequent Nexus updates was reviewed for accuracy and, where necessary, amended to remove or modify projects that have changed in need to mitigate impacts based on changes in the patterns of growth and travel demand within the region. Projects completed since the adoption of the 2009 Nexus Update were also removed from the network to reflect the fact that mitigation at these locations is no longer required. The specific network changes were screened by the WRCOG Public Works Committee for consistency with TUMF network guidelines including travel demand and traffic performance, and were subsequently reviewed by representatives of the public and privates sectors at a series of workshop meetings conducted between November 2014 and January 2015. In response to the release of the 2015 Nexus Update draft study document, the TUMF Network was further reviewed by a consultant team hired by the BIA, with findings and recommendations provided in a letter dated August 8, 2015. A final review of the TUMF Network and associated improvements was conducted by WRCOG staff in cooperation with the Public Works Committee during the summer and fall of 2016 specifically in conjunction with the 2016 Nexus Update to include consideration of the revised travel forecasts based on the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS demographic forecasts. Based on the findings of the network screening, workshop meetings and other reviews, elements of specific projects were revised to reflect necessary network corrections and modifications to project assumptions. Matrices summarizing the disposition of the requests received as part of both the 2015 and 2016 TUMF Nexus Updates were developed and are included in Appendix G. Eligible arterial highway and street improvement types to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development on Network facilities include: 1. Construction of additional Network roadway lanes; 2. Construction of new Network roadway segments; 3. Expansion of existing Network bridge structures; 4. Construction of new Network bridge structures; 5. Expansion of existing Network interchanges with freeways; 6. Construction of new Network interchanges with freeways; 7. Grade separation of existing Network at -grade railroad crossings; WRCOG 35 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 All eligible improvement types provide additional capacity to Network facilities to accommodate future traffic growth generated by new development in Western Riverside County. Following the comprehensive update of the TUMF Program, the estimated total cost to improve the RSHA for Western Riverside County is $3.45 billion with this cost including all arterial highway and street planning, engineering, design, right-of-way acquisition and capital construction costs, but not including transit, MSHCP or program administration costs that will be subsequently described. It should be noted that the full cost to improve the TUMF Network cannot be entirely attributed to new development and must be adjusted to account for the previous obligation of other funds to complete necessary improvements and unfunded existing needs. Sections 4.5 and 4.6 describe the adjustments to the total TUMF Network improvement need to account for existing needs and obligated funds. In addition to the arterial highway and street improvement costs indicated above, the TUMF Nexus Update included specific consideration for the TUMF Program obligation to the MSHCP program to mitigate the impact of TUMF network improvements on species and habitat within Western Riverside County. The TUMF obligation to MSHCP was calculated at a rate of 5% of the total construction (capital) cost of new lane segments, bridges and railroad grade separations on the TUMF Network. The total obligation to the MSHCP as indicated in the TUMF Network cost fee table is approximately $45.4 million, although the total obligation specific to the TUMF program is reduced to account for MSHCP obligations associated with improvements addressing existing needs and therefore excluded from TUMF. The TUMF 2016 Nexus Update similarly includes specific consideration of the costs associated with WRCOG administration of the TUMF Program. The average cost for WRCOG to administer the TUMF Program was calculated at a rate of 4% of the total eligible cost of new lane segments (including interchanges, bridges and railroad grade separations) on the TUMF Network and new transit services. Administration costs incurred by WRCOG include direct salary, fringe benefit and overhead costs for WRCOG staff assigned to administer the program and support participating jurisdictions, and costs for consultant, legal and auditing services to support the implementation of the TUMF program. The total cost for WRCOG administration of the TUMF Program as indicated in the TUMF Network cost fee table is approximately $1 12.2 million. The detailed TUMF network cost calculations are provided in Section 4.7, including each of the individual segments and cost components considered as part of the TUMF Program, and the maximum eligible TUMF share for each segment following adjustments for obligated funding and unfunded existing needs as described in subsequent sections. 4.4 Public Transportation Component of the TUMF System In addition to the roadway network, public transportation plays a key role in serving future travel demand in the region. Public transportation serving inter -community trips is generally provided in the form of public bus transit services and in particular express bus WRCOG 36 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 or other high frequency services between strategically located community transit centers. In Western Riverside County, these bus transit services are typically provided by RTA. Transit needs to serve future regional travel in Western Riverside County via bus transit include vehicle acquisitions, transit centers, express bus stop upgrades, maintenance facilities and other associated capital improvements to develop express bus or other high frequency inter -community transit bus services within the region. Metrolink commuter rail service improvements were not included in the TUMF Program as they typically serve longer inter -regional commute trips equivalent to freeway trips on the inter -regional highway system. The network of regionally significant bus transit services represents those express bus and other high frequency transit bus services that primarily support inter -community trips in Western Riverside County and supplement the regional highway system and inter- regional commuter rail services. As a result, this portion of the bus transit system also represents the extents of the network of bus services that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The TUMF Bus Transit Network is the system of bus services that serve inter -community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. The Bus Transit Network for Western Riverside County was identified based on several transit network and performance guidelines as follows: 1. Bus transit routes (or corridors comprised of multiple overlapping routes) proposed to have a frequency of greater than three buses per direction during peak hours at ultimate build out. 2. Routes or corridors that serve multiple jurisdictions and/or provide connectivity between communities, both within and adjoining western Riverside County. 3. Routes or corridors with forecast weekday bus ridership in excess of 1,000 person trips per day by 2040. 4. Routes or corridors that are proposed to provide timed interconnections with at least four other routes or corridors at ultimate build out. 5. Routes or corridors that utilize the majority of travel along the TUMF RSHA. 6. Routes or corridors that provide direct access to areas of forecast population and employment growth, major commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational or tourist activity centers, and multi -modal transportation facilities (such as airports, railway terminals and transit centers). Express bus routes and other high -frequency bus transit routes and corridors in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied the respective guidelines were identified by RTA based on service information developed as part of the RTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis completed in January 2015. The TUMF Bus Transit Network was subsequently endorsed by the WRCOG Public Works Committee, WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee, and the WRCOG Executive Committee as the basis for the transit component of the 2016 Nexus Update. Updated cost estimates for improving the infrastructure serving public transportation, including construction of transit centers and transfer facilities, express bus stop upgrades, and capital improvements needed to develop express bus and other high WRCOG 37 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 frequency bus transit service within the region were provided by RTA. The updated transit unit cost data provided by RTA are shown in Table 4.3. Table 4.3 - Unit Costs for Transit Capital Expenditures Component Type" Cost Assumptions as published October 18, 2002 Cost Assumptions per 2009 Nexus Update October 5, 2009 Cost Assumptions per 2015 Nexus Update Description Transit Center 1 $6,000,000 $5,655,000 $6,000,000 Relocation/expansion of existing Regional Transit Center with up to 14 bus bays and park and ride Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 New Regional Transit Center with up to 14 bus bays and park and ride Transfer Facility $1,000,000 Multiple route transfer hub 0 & M Facility $50,000,000 Regional Operations andMaintenance Facility Bus Stop $10,000 $27,000 $40,000 Bus Stop Amenities Upgrade on TUMF Network BRT Service Capital $540,000 $550,000 $60,000 BRT/Limited Stop Service Capital (per stop**) Vehicle Fleet 1 $155,000 Medium Sized Bus Contract Operated Vehicle Fleet 2 $325,125 $550,000 $585,000 Large Sized Bus Directly Operated COA Study $950,000 Comprehensive Operational Analysis Study component of Nexus Study Update * Transit Cost Component Types were restructured as part of the 2015 Nexus Update in accordance with the RTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis (January 2015) ** BRT Service Capital Cost Assumption was based on a per mile unit in 2009 Nexus Update. 2016 Nexus Update uses a per stop unit cost for BRT Service Capital The estimated total cost for future RTA bus transit services to accommodate forecast transit demand is approximately $153.1 million with this cost including all planning, engineering, design and capital improvement costs. Detailed transit component cost estimates are included in Section 4.7. WRCOG 38 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 4.5 Existing Obligated Funding For some of the facilities identified in the TUMF network, existing obligated funding has previously been secured through traditional funding sources to complete necessary improvements, including most recently California Senate Bill (SB) 1 Transportation Funding approved by Governor Brown on April 28, 2017. Since funding has been obligated to provide for the completion of needed improvements to the TUMF system, the funded cost of these improvements will not be recaptured from future developments through the TUMF Program. As a result, the TUMF network cost was adjusted accordingly to reflect the availability of obligated funds. To determine the availability of obligated funds, each jurisdiction in Western Riverside County (including the County of Riverside, the participating cities, and RCTC) was asked to review their current multi-year capital improvement programs to identify transportation projects on the TUMF system. A detailed table identifying the obligated funds for segments of the TUMF network is included in Appendix H. A total of $303.5 million in obligated funding was identified for improvements to the TUMF system. The estimated TUMF network cost was subsequently reduced by this amount. 4.6 Unfunded Existing Improvement Needs A review of the existing traffic conditions on the TUMF network (as presented in Table 3.1) indicates that some segments of the roadways on the TUMF system currently experience congestion and operate at unacceptable levels of service. In addition, demand for inter -community transit service already exists and future utilization of proposed inter -community transit services will partially reflect this existing demand. The need to improve these portions of the system is generated by existing demand, rather than the cumulative regional impacts of future new development, so future new development cannot be assessed for the equivalent cost share of improvements providing for this existing need. In the initial TUMF Nexus Study, the cost of existing improvement needs was estimated by identifying the roadway segments on the TUMF network that operate at LOS E or F according to the modeled 2000 base year volumes. The application of the LOS E threshold is consistent with national traffic analysis guidance that stipulates LOS D as the minimum acceptable LOS for arterial roadway facilities. The cost to improve these roadway segments with existing unacceptable LOS was calculated using the same method applied to estimate the overall system improvement cost. This method estimated the share of the particular roadway segment (including all associated ROW, interchange, structure and soft costs) that was experiencing unacceptable LOS, and reduced the estimated cost to reflect the relative share. The adjusted value reflected the maximum eligible under the TUMF Program to improve only those portions of the segment (and the relative share of associated improvement costs) that were not experiencing an existing need and were therefore considered to be exclusively addressing the cumulative impacts of new development. WRCOG 39 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 By the application of this methodology, the initial TUMF Nexus Study did not account for the incremental cumulative impact of new development on those segments with an identified existing need. For this reason, the methodology to account for existing need was reviewed as part of the TUMF 2005 update to provide for the inclusion of incremental traffic growth on those segments with existing need. As part of the 2016 Nexus Update, the methodology to account for existing need on arterial segments was further refined to utilize peak period traffic conditions as the basis for the calculation, rather than daily traffic conditions. Peak period performance measures typically reflect the highest level of demand for transportation facilities and therefore are typically utilized as the basis for project design making peak period a more appropriate basis for determining existing need (and future mitigation needs) as part of the TUMF program. The existing need methodology for the 2016 Nexus Update was also expanded to include spot improvements on the TUMF Network (including interchanges, bridges and railroad crossings). Due to limitations in previously available traffic forecast data, prior versions of the TUMF Nexus Study only determined existing need for arterial segments and did not explicitly include existing need for spot improvements. To account for existing need in the TUMF Network as part of the 2016 Nexus Update, the cost for facilities identified as currently experiencing LOS E or F was adjusted. This was done by identifying the portion of any TUMF facility in the RivTAM 2012 Baseline scenario with a volume to capacity (v/c) ratio of greater than 0.9 (the threshold for LOS E), and extracting the share of the overall facility cost to improve that portion. This cost adjustment provides for the mitigation of incremental traffic growth on those TUMF segments with an existing high level of congestion. The following approach was applied to account for incremental traffic growth associated with new development as part of the existing need methodology: 1. Facilities with an existing need were identified by reviewing the RivTAM 2012 Baseline scenario assigned traffic on the 2015 existing network and delineating those facilities included on the TUMF Cost Fee Summary Table that have an average directional v/c exceeding 0.90. a. Weighted directional v/c values were used to determine existing need for network segments, which was calculated by: i. Determining the length for the portion of each segment (model link), and calculating the ratio of link length to the overall segment length ii. Generating the average directional v/c for each link, for both directions in AM and PM periods, and multiplying by link/segment length ratio iii. Determining the maximum peak -period peak -direction v/c for each link, representing the highest directional v/c in either AM or PM iv. Calculating weighted average v/c for each TUMF segment, based on the sum of all weighted max v/c values of each link within a segment WRCOG 40 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 b. A similar method was used to determine existing need for spot improvements including interchanges, railroad crossings and bridges. However, no weighting was used in the calculation of existing need for spot improvements. For these facilities, the peak -period peak -direction v/c values (highest directional v/c in either AM or PM) were utilized in the existing need calculation. This was based on the individual link within a network segment where a bridge or railroad crossing is located, or on - and off -ramps in the case of interchanges. 2. Initial costs of addressing the existing need were calculated by estimating the share of a particular roadway segments "new lane" cost, or individual spot improvement cost (including all associated ROW and soft costs). 3. Incremental growth in v/c was determined by comparing the average directional base year v/c for the TUMF facilities (delineated under step one) with the horizon year v/c for the corresponding segments and spot improvements calculated based on the RivTAM 2040 No -Build scenario assigned traffic on the 2012 existing network using the same methodology as the base year v/c. 4. The proportion of the incremental growth attributable to new development was determined by dividing the result of step three with the total 2040 No -Build scenario v/c in excess of LOS E. 5. For those segments experiencing a net increase in v/c over the base year, TUMF will 'discount' the cost of existing need improvements by the proportion of the incremental v/c growth through 2040 No -Build compared to the 2012 Baseline v/c (up to a maximum of 100%). The unfunded cost of existing highway improvement needs (including the related MSHCP obligation) totals $431.7 million. Appendix H includes a detailed breakdown of the existing highway improvement needs on the TUMF network, including the associated unfunded improvement cost estimate for each segment and spot improvement experiencing unacceptable LOS. For transit service improvements, the cost to provide for existing demand was determined by multiplying the total transit component cost by the share of future transit trips representing existing demand. The cost of existing transit service improvement needs is $60.5 million representing 39.5% of the TUMF transit component. Appendix H includes tables reflecting the calculation of the existing transit need share and the existing transit need cost. 4.7 Maximum TUMF Eligible Cost A total of $303.5 million in obligated funding was identified for improvements to the TUMF system. Since these improvements are already funded with other available revenue sources, the funded portion of these projects cannot also be funded with TUMF revenues. Furthermore, the total cost of the unfunded existing improvement need is WRCOG 41 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 $492.2 million. These improvements are needed to mitigate existing transportation deficiencies and therefore their costs cannot be assigned to new development through the TUMF. Based on the estimated costs described in Sections 4.3 and 4.4, the total value to complete the identified TUMF network and transit improvements, and administer the program is $3.76 billion. Having accounted for obligated funds and unfunded existing needs as described in Sections 4.5 and 4.6, respectively, the estimated maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program is $2.96 billion. The maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program includes approximately $2.71 billion in eligible arterial highway and street related improvements and $92.6 million in eligible transit related improvements. An additional $43.3 million is also eligible as part of the TUMF Program to mitigate the impact of eligible TUMF related arterial highway and street projects on critical native species and wildlife habitat, while $1 12.2 million is provided to cover the costs incurred by WRCOG to administer the TUMF Program. Figure 4.4 illustrates the various improvements to the RSHA included as part of the TUMF network cost calculation. Table 4.4 summarizes the TUMF network cost calculations for each of the individual segments. This table also identifies the maximum eligible TUMF share for each segment having accounted for obligated funding and unfunded existing need. A detailed breakdown of the individual cost components and values for the various TUMF Network segments is included in Appendix H. Table 4.5 outlines the detailed transit component cost estimates. It should be noted that the detailed cost tables (and fee levels) are subject to regular review and updating by WRCOG and therefore WRCOG should be contacted directly to obtain the most recently adopted version of these tables (and to confirm the corresponding fee level). WRCOG 42 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Pass Zone IL ormi 1111 011111L ..Northwest Zonle ICentral Zone 1:711741.11, I I I I I I PS -1) 1Ph 111111M, • Pigl joinak op.1-1,rriet/San Jacinto Zone 4744.1t iort Southwest Zone a a Legend Ultimata Hurrinar of Canna 2 Laras 4 lann La^oa La^cs Railroad Crossings • Naar HauGiade CIC6Sng Iniurchanglia 0 0 Bridgini tlildpc Imprommenr 7runua Con.r Opef.Llon I 40.1 C00.41 FlapaLinh #01.1 Cowry Parlowly Nole The lg. le,fies Ale sub, 10 hotIner cilans Onseo Or h. :ocAroOridelerrnmel.07 a Regional System of Highways and Arterials (RSHA) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program I Figure 4.4 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates AREA PLAN DISI CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO MILES TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Elhanac Goetz Murrieta 0.99 $0 $0 Cenlral Menifee Elhanac Murrieta 1-215 0,90 50 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac 1-215 interchange 0.00 $17,897.000 $15.766,003 Central Menifee Ethanac Sherman Matthews 0,61 $1,617.000 $1.617.000 Cenlral Menifee Ethanac BNSF San Jacinto Branch railroad crossing 0.00 $36,980,000 $33,018,000 Central Menifee Menifee SR -74 (Pinacalel Simpson 2.49 90 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Salt Creek bridge 0,00 50 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Simpson Aldergate 0.64 50 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Aldergale Newport 0.98 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Newport Holland 1.07 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Holland Gorbani 1,03 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Carboni ScoR 1.00 $2,635,000 $2,635,000 Cenlral Menifee Menifee/Whitewood Scott Murrieta City Limit 0.53 $0 90 Central Menifee Newport Goetz Murrieta 1.81 $0 $0 Cenlral Menifee Newport Morriela 1-215 2.05 $5,405,000 $5,405,000 Cenlral Menifee Newport 1-215 Menifee 0.95 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Menifee Lindenberger 0.77 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Lindenberger SR -79 (Winchester) 3.58 $0 50 Cenlral Menifee Scott 1-215 Briggs 2.04 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott 1-215 interchange 0.00 §37,060,000 $37,060.000 Cenlral Menifee Scott Sunset Murrieta 1.01 $2,654,000 $2,654,000 Central Menifee SCo11 Murrieta -215 1.94 510,254,000 $10.254,000 Central Menifee SR -74 Matthews Briggs 1.89 54,994,003 54,994,003 Central Moreno Volley Alessandro 1-215 Perris 3.52 56,394,030 $6,394,030 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Perris Nason 2.00 $22,632.000 $22,632,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Nason Moreno Beach 0.99 $6.922.000 $6.922,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Moreno Beach Gilman Springs 4,13 $10.902,000 510,902,000 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR -60 AJessandro 1.67 $4.411,000 $3.724,000 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR -60 interchange 0.00 $17,897,000 $17,897,000 Central Moreno Valley Penis Reche Vista Ironwood 2.09 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Ironwood Sunnymead 0.52 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris SR -60 interchange 0.00 $17,897,000 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Sunnymead Cactus 2.00 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Penis Cactus Harley Knox 3.50 $0 $0 Central Moreno Volley Reche Vista Moreno Valley City Limit Heacock 0.44 $3,310,000 $1,705,030 Central Perris 11th/Case Perris Goetz 0.30 52.100,000 $2,100,000 Central Perris Case Goetz 1-215 2.36 516.486.000 $13,538.000 Cenlral Perris Case San Jacinto River bridge 0.00 $1,126,020 $495,000 Central Perris Ethanac Keystone Goetz 2.24 $7,327,000 57,327,030 Central Penis Elhanac San Jacinto River bridge 0.00 $7,376.003 $7.378,030 Central Penis Ethanac I-215 Sherman 0.35 52,435,000 $1,945,003 Central Perris Goetz Case Elhanac 2,00 $5,267,000 $2,506,000 Central Penis Goetz San Jacinto River bridge 0.00 $3,688,000 $1,925.000 Central Penis Mid -County (Placentia) 1-215 Penis 0.87 $13,127,000 $12,627,000 Central Penis Mid -County (Placentia) 1-215 interchange 0.00 $37,060,000 512,354,000 Centro) Perris Mid -County Perris Evans 1.57 $32,902,000 $32,902,000 Central Penis Mid -County Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge 0.00 $8,299,000 $8,299,000 Central Perris Perris Harley Knox Ramona 1.00 $0 50 Central Perris Perris Ramona Citrus 2.49 $6,578,000 $6,578,000 Cenlral Perris Perris CiVusNuevo 0.50 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Nuevo 11th 1.75 $12,206,000 $9,034,000 Central Penis Perris -215 overcrossing bridge 0.03 $2,767,000 $1,356,000 Cenlral Penis Ramona 1-215 Perris 1.47 $52,769,00 52,769,000 Cenlral Perris Ramona 1-215 interchange 0.03 $17,897,000 $5,965,000 Central Penis Ramona Perris Evans 1,00 $0 $0 Central Penis Ramona Evans Mid-Counly (2,800 11 E of Rider) 2.62 $0 $0 Central Penis SR -74 (41h) Ellis 1-215 2.29 $0 90 Central Unincorporated Ethanac SR -74 Keystone 1.07 $5,646,000 55,646,030 Central Unincorporated Gilman Springs Alessandro Bridge 4,98 $15,815,000 $8,105.000 Cenlral Unincorporated Menifee Nuevo SR -74 (Pinacate) 4.07 510,737,000 $10,737,000 Central Unincorporated Mid-Counly Evans Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) 0,77 $8,587,000 $8,587,000 Central Unincorporated Mid-Counly (Ramona) Ramona (2,80011 E of Rider) Pico Avenue 0.44 $1,161,000 $1,161.000 Central Unincorporated Md-Counly (Ramona) Pico Avenue Bridge 5,95531,413,000 $25,287,000 Central Unincorporated Mid-Counly (Ramona) San Jacinto River bridge 0.03' $23,978,000 $15,035,000 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon San Bernardino County Reche Vista 3.35 512,457,000 $9,429,000 Central Unincorporated Reche Vista Reche Canyon Moreno Valley Cily Limit 1.22 $9,180,000 $4,729,000 Central Unincorporated Scott Briggs SR -79 (Winchester) 3.04 §16,042,000 $0 Central Unincorporated SR -74 Ethanac Ellis 2,68 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco I -IS Temescol Canyon 0.66 $2.306.000 $2,306,000 Northwest Corona Cajalco 1-15 interchange 0-00 $72,546,000 $44,251,003 Northwest Corona Foothill Paseo Grande Lincoln 2,60 $19,330,000 $7.282.000 Northwest Corona Foothill Wardlow Wash bridge 0.03'55,534,000 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Lincoln California 2,81 $1l $0 Northwest Corona Foothill California -IS 0,89 $6,207.000 $4,304,000 Northwest Corona Green River 5R-91 Dominguez Ranch 0.52 $3.624,000 $1,000 Northwest Corona Green River Dominguez Ranch Palisades 0.56 $4,214.000 $1,639,000 Northwest Corona Green River Palisades Paseo Grande 2.01 $0 50 Northwest Easlvale Schleisman San Bernardino County 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek 0.65 $2,271,000 $2.271,000 Northwest Easlvale Schleisman Cucamonga Creek bridge 0.00 $923.000 $923.000 Northwest Easlvale Schleismon 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek Harrison 0,87 $0 $0 Northwest Easlvale Schleisman Harrison Sumner 0,50 $0 $0 Northwest Easlvale Schleisman Sumner Scholar 0.50 $3,493,000 $3,493,000 Northwest Easlvale Schleisman Scholar AStreet 0.31 50 $0 Northwest Easlvale Schleisman AStreet Hamner 0.27 $0 50 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren SR -60 Bellegrave 1.43 59,976,000 $3,628,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren Bellegrave Santa Ana River 3.60 925,115,030 $7,444,000 WRCOG 44 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIS1 CIN Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Nodhwesl Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Nodhwesl Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorpora led Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorpora led Northwest Unincorpora led Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorpora led Northwest Unincorporated Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Unincorpora led Pass Unincorpora led San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated Son Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated Southwest Canyon Lake Southwest Canyon Lake Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Murrieta Southwest Munieta Southwest Murriela Soulhwesl Murrieta Southwest Murrieta Soulhwesl Murrieta Southwest Murriela Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Soulhwesl Temecula Southwest Unincorpora led Soulhwesl Unincorpora led Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Wildomor Southwest Wildomar Soulhwesl Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Subtotal STREETNAME Alessandro Arlington Arlington Van Buren Van Buren Van Buren Van Buren Alessandro Alessandro Cajalco Cajalco Cajalco Cajalco Cajalco Cajalco Van Buren Van Buren Beaumont Potrero Potrero Potrero Po hero Potrero SR -79 (Beaumont) SR -79 (Beaumont) SR -79 (Beaumont) SR -79 (Lamb Canyon) Domenigoni Domenigoni SR -74 Mid -County (Ramona) Mid -County (Ramona) Ramona Ramona Ramona Ramona Domenigoni Domenigoni Gilman Springs Mid -County (Ramona) SR -74 SR -79 (Hemet Bypass) SR -79 (Hemet Bypass) SR -79 (Hemet Bypass) SR -79 (San Jacinto Bypas SR -79 (Sanderson) SR -79 (Sanderson) SR -79 (Winchester) Goetz Railroad Canyon Railroad Canyon Railroad Canyon SR -74 Clinton Keith Clinton Keith Clinton Keith French Valley (Dote) French Valley (Date) Whilewood Whilewood French Valley (Date) French Valley (Dote) French Valley (Date) French Valley (Cherry) French Valley (Cherry) Western Bypass (Diaz) Western Bypass (Vincent Western Bypass (Vincent Western Bypass (Vincent SR -79 (Winchester) SR -79 (Winchester) Benton Clinton Keith Clinton Keith SR -74 SR -79 (Winchester( SR -79 (Winchester) SR -79 (Winchester) SR -79 (Winchester) Bundy Canyon Bundy Canyon Bundy Canyon Clinton Keith Clinton Keith $EGMENIFROM Arlington North Magnolia Santa Ana River SR -91 Wood Trautwein Trautwein Vista Grande EI Sobrante Harley John Harvil Temescal Canyon Temescal Wash La Sierra Mockingbird Canyon Orange Terrace Oak Valley (14th) SEGMENTA? Trautwein Magnolia Alessandro SR -91 Mockingbird Canyon Trautwein Orange Terrace Vista Grande 1-215 Harley John Harvil 1-215 La Sierra bridge El Sobranle Wood 1-215 1-10 Oak Valley (San Smoleo Car SR -60 SR -60 UP Noble Creek SR -60 1-10 1-10 Mellow California Warren Sanderson Winchester Warren Sanderson/SR-79 (Hemel Sanderson State Main Cedar SR -79 (Winchester) San Diego Aqueduct Bridge Bridge Briggs SR -74 (Florida) San Diego Aqueduct Domenigoni s) Avid -County (Ramona) Gilman Springs San Jacinto River Domenigoni Railroad Canyon Canyon Hills 1-15 1-15 1-15 Copper Craft Toulon 1-215 Murrieta Hol Springs Winchester Creek Menifee City Limit Keller Margarita Ynez 1-15 Jefferson Murrieta Creek Cherry Mon Rancho California Mord-15 Mon Murrieta Creek Murrieta Hot Springs 1-15 SR -79 Whitewood Warm Springs Creek 1-15 Keller Thompson La Alba Hunter 1-15 Monte Vista 1-15 Palomar f-15 interchange railroad crossing bridge 4th Mellow interchange Colilornia Gilman Springs Sanderson State Warren Sanderson Bypc interchange State Main Cedar SR -74 Warren bridge Sanderson Warren SR -79 (Winchester) Domenigoni bridge Winchester SR -74 (Honda) Ramona bridge Keller Newport Goetz Canyon Hills interchange interchange Toulon 1-215 Whitewood Winchester Creek Margarita Keller Clinton Keith Ynez Jefferson interchange Diaz bridge Rancho California SR -79 (Front) interchange bridge Jefferson interchange Eastern Bypass SR -79 bridge Elhanac Thompson La Alba Hunter Murriela Hot Springs Monte Vista Sunset interchange 1-15 Copper Cretl MILES TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE 2,21 $0 50 5.92 $7.031,000 $7,031.000 2,02 $13,957,000 $10,001,000 3.44 $7.456,000 $7,456,000 3.10 $20,845.000 $10,847,000 0.43 $0 $0 1.27 $3,470,000 53,470,000 1,22 $0 50 1.26 $0 $0 0.76 $4.806,000 $3.465.000 5.79 $80,889,000 566.905,000 0.28 5749,000 5749.000 3.21 $23,864,000 523,864,000 0.00 $3,229,000 $3,229,000 6.11 545,421,000 $45,421,000 4.41 $30,785.000 528,309,000 1.89 $7,637,000 57,637,000 1.37 $0 $0 0.72 $1,615,000 51,615.000 0.00 $37.060,000 523,760,000 0,00 $7,927,000 57,927,000 0,00 52,306,000 $2,306,000 0,45 $2.376.000 52.376,000 0.80 $0 $0 0.00 517,897,000 $5,369,000 0.38 $0 $0 4.87 $0 $0 1.77 34,674,000 $4,674,000 2.14 $0 $0 2.59 516,085,000 516,085,000 1,73 $12,065,000 $12,065,000 0.00 $37,060,000 $37,060,000 2.39 $0 $0 2.66 $0 $0 2.08 $11,623,000 $11,139,000 1.10 $0 $0 3.10 $8,173,000 $8,173,000 0.00 52.767,000 52.767.000 2.95 $7,782,000 57.782,000 2,35 $12,396,000 $11.045,000 3.53 $9,301,000 59,301.000 3.22 $16,990.000 $16,990,000 0.00 $5,534,000 $5,534,000 1.50 $7,914,000 57,914,000 6.50 $34,296,000 $30,076,000 1.92 $5.060,000 $2,376,000 0.00 512,910,000 $6,100,000 4.90 $0 50 0.50 $0 50 1.95 $0 $0 2.29 $3,021,000 53,021,000 000 572,546,000 $28,636,000 0,00 937.060,000 $17.725.000 0.83 50 $0 0.83 $2,187,000 $2,187,000 0.75 $0 $0 0.24' 53,352,000 53,352,000 0.61 $0 50 0.55' 50 $0 2.00 $2,111,000 52,111,000 0.91 $0 50 0.73 510,199,000 510,199,000 0.00' 572,546,000 555.760,000 0.56 $5.711.000 55.711.000 0.00 57.746,000 $7,746.000 2.14 $5,382,000 $5,382,000 1.48 $21.961,000 521,961,000 0.00 $37.060.000 520,682.000 0.00 $5.534,000 $5,534,000 2.70 $0 $0 0.00' $17.897.000 $8,442,000 2.40 $0 $0 2,54 520,104,000 $3,604,000 0,00' 533,200,000 $27,052,000 4.89 513,064,000 513.064,000 2,47 517,220,000 517,220.000 1.81 512,652,000 $12,652,000 0.50 53,514,000 $2,771,000 1.14 $513,000 $513,000 032' $793,000 5793,000 3.10 $9,850.000 $9,850,000 0.130' $17.897.000 57,159,000 0.55 $0 $0 2.48 85.627.000 8417580) 225.78' 51,643,535.000' 51.227.935.000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 45 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIS1CITy STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO MILES TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Briggs Newport Scott 3.05 $0 $0 Central Menifee Goetz Juanita Lesser Lane 2,61 36.884,000 36.593.000 Central Menifee Goetz Newport Juanila 1,36 $0 $0 Central Menifee Hollond Antelope Houn 1.00 $13,971,000 $13.971,000 Central Menifee Holland 1-215 overcrossing bridge 0.00 $6,455,C00 $6,455,000 Central Menifee McCall 1-215 Aspel 1.23 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall 1-215 interchange 0,00 517,897,000 $16,930,000 Central Menifee McCall Aspel Menifee 0.95 $2,517,000 32,517,000 Central Menifee Murriela Elhanac McCall 1.95 30 $0 Central Menifee Murriela McCall Newport 2,03 30 30 Central Menifee Murriela Newport Bundy Canyon 3.00 $0 30 Central Moreno Valley Caclus 1-215 Heacock 1.81 32,022,000 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus 1-215 interchange 0.00 $37,060,000 $37,060,000 Central Moreno Valley Day Ironwood SR -60 0.28 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR -60 inlerchange 0.00 $17,897,000 $17,897,000 Cenlral Moreno Valley Day SR -60 Eucalyptus 0.77 50 30 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus 1-215 Towngale 1.00 54,050,000 $4,050,000 Central Moreno Volley Eucalyptus Towngate Frederick 0.67 $0 30 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Frederick Heacock 1.01 30 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Heacock Kitching 1.01 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Kitching Moreno Beach 2.42 $339,000 30 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Moreno Beach Theodore 228 516,882,000 516.882.000 Central Moreno Valley Frederick SR -60 Alessandro 1.55 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Cactus San Michele 2.79 $4,482,000 $4,482,000 Central Moreno Volley Heacock Reche Vista Cactus 4.73 30 30 Central Moreno Volley Heacock San Michele Harley Knox 0.74 $1,958,000 $1,532,000 Cenlral Moreno Volley Ironwood SR -60 Day 1.33 $2,695,000 $2,695,000 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood Day Heacock 2.01 $0 50 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle Alessandro John F Kennedy 1.00 50 50 Cenlral Moreno Valley Lasselle John F Kennedy Oleander 3.14 $0 30 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach Reche Canyon SR -60 1.37 $9,548,000 $9,548,000 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach SR -60 overcrossing bridge 0.00 $2,306.000 $2,306,000 Central Moreno Volley Nason SR -60 Alessandro 1.51 $0 30 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass Ironwood SR -60 0.43 $0 $0 Central Moreno Volley Pigeon Pass/CEfAP Corridor Cantorini Ironwood 3.23 30 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Canyon Moreno Valley City Limit Locust 0.35 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands Locust Alessandro 2,68 $18,721,000 $18,013.000 Central Moreno Valley Redlands SR -60 interchange 0.00 337,060,000 $37,060,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR -60 Eucalyptus 0.26 $1,817,000 $1,817,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR -60 interchange 0.00 337,060.000 $19.096.000 Central Perris Evans Oleander Ramona 0.99 30 $0 Central Penis Evans Ramona Morgan 0.59 $1,562,000 $1,562,000 Central Perris Evans Morgan Rider 0.49 $0 30 Central Perris Evans Rider Placentia 0.58 $0 30 Central Perris Evans Placentia Nuevo 1.50 $1,347,000 $1,347,000 Central Penis Evans Nuevo 1-215 1.99 $10,521,000 $10,521,000 Central Perris Evans San Jacinto River bridge 0.00 $7,378,000 $7.378,000 Central Penis Goetz Lesser Ethanac 1.04 $2,745,000 31,238,000 Central Penis Harley Knox 1-215 Indian 1.53 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox 1-215 interchange 0.00 $17,897,000 $7,110,000 Central Perris Harley Knox Indian Perris 0.50 50 $0 Central Penis Harley Knox Perris Redlands 0,50 50 $0 Central Perris Nuevo 1-215 Muriela 1,36 $9,480,000 $9.480,000 Central Perris Nuevo 1-215 interchange 0,00 $17,897,000 $17,897,000 Cenlral Penis Nuevo Murriela Dunlap 1.00 $2,035.000 $2,035,000 Cenlral Perris Nuevo Penis Valley Slorm Channel bridge 0.00 $2,767,000 $2,767,000 Central Perris SR -74 (Matthews) 1-215 Ethanac 1,25 $0 30 Central Perris SR -74 (Matthews) 1-215 inlerchange 0.00 $17.897.000 $8,815,000 Central Unincorporated Briggs SR -74 (Pinacate) Simpson 2,50 $6,596,000 56,596.000 Central Unincorporaled Briggs Simpson Newport 1.53 30 $0 Central Unincorporated Briggs Salt Creek Bridge 0.00 $0 50 Central Unincorporaled Cenler (Main) 1-215 Mt Vernon 1.50 50 $0 Central Unincorporaled Cenler (Main) 1-215 interchange 0.00 $17,897,000 317,897,000 Central Unincorporated Center (Main) BNSF railroad crossing 0.00 $7,927,000 $7.927,000 Central Unincorporated Ellis Post SR -74 2.65 56,989,000 $6,989,000 Cenlral Unincorporated Mount Vernon/CETAP CorridsCenler Pigeon Pass 0.61 $2.252,000 $2,252,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo Dunlap Menifee 2,00 $5,273,000 $5,273,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo San Jacinto River bridge 000 $3.688,000 33,688,000 Central Unincorporaled Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Cantarini Mount Vernon 3,38 $25,146,000 $25.146,000 Central Unincorporated Post Santa Rosa Mine Ellis 0,44 $0 $Ll Central Unincorporaled Reche Canyon Reche Vista Moreno Valley Cily Limit 3.20 30 $0 Central Unincorporaled Redlands San imoteo Canyon Locust 2.60 $0 50 WRCOG 46 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIS1CITY Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Corona Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Eastvale Northwest Junipa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Volley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Junipa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Jurupa Valley Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Northwest Norco Norihwesl Norco Northwest Norco STREETNAME dth Auto Center Cajalco Hidden Volley Lincoln Magnolia Magnolia Magnolia Magnolia Main Main Main Main Main McKinley McKinley McKinley McKinley McKinley Ontario Ontario Ontario Ontario Ontario Ontario Ontario Railroad Railroad Railroad River Serlas Club Archibald Hamner Hamner Hamner Hamner Hamner Limonite Limonite Limonite Limonite Limonite Limonite Limonite Limonite Armstrong Bellegrave Cantu-Galleano Ranch Etiwanda Etiwanda Limonite Limonite Limonite Limonite Limonite Markel Market Mission Mission Riverview Rubidoux Rubidoux Valley 1st 1st 2nd 6th 6th Arlington California Corydon Hamner Hamner Hidden Valley Hidden Valley Norco North River SEGMENTFROM SR -91 Railroad Bedford Canyon Norco Hills Parkridge 61h Temescal Creek Sherborn Bridge Rimpau Grand Ontario Hidden Valley Parkridge SR -91 Hidden Valley Promenade SR -91 Mington Channel BNSF 1-15 Lincoln Buena Vista Main Kellogg Fullerton Rimpau Auto Club BNSF Buena Vista Corydon SR -91 San Bernardino County Mission Bellegrave Amberhill Limonite Schleisman 1-15 1-15 East Center Hamner Sumner Harrison Archibald Cucamonga Creek San Bernardino County Cantu-Galleano Ranch Wineville San Bernardino County SR -60 1-15 Wineville Eliwanda Van Buren Clay Rubidoux Santa Ana River Milliken SR -60 Limonite San Bernardino County SR -60 Armstrong Parkridge Mountain River Hamner I-15 North Mington River Santa Ana River Santa Ana River 1-15 Hamner Corydon California Archibald SEGMENTTO Magnolia SR -91 I-15 McKinley Ontario Sherborn Bridge bridge Rimpau Ontario Ontario Foothill Parkridge SR -91 S. Grand Promenade SR -91 Magnolia bridge railroad crossing El Cerrito Buena Vista Main Kellogg Fullerton Rimpau 1-15 Buena Vista railroad crossing Main (al Grand) Main Green River River Bellegrave Amberhill Limonite Schleisman Santa Ana River East Center interchange Hamner Sumner Harrison Archibald Hellman (Keller SBD Co.) bridge Valley Van Buren Bellegrave SR -60 Limonite Wineville Etiwanda Van Buren Clay Riverview Santa Ana River bridge 5R-60 Santa Ana River Mission Mission interchange Mission Mountain Hamner 1-15 California interchange Mington 61h 51h bridge Hidden Valley Norco Hills I-15 Hamner Mington Corydon NILES TOTAL COST MAXIMUM IUMF SHARE 4.50 $0 50 0.48 $0 $0 0.15 51.049.000 51,049,003 0,59 50 50 3.20 $0 50 0,47 $3,283,000 $3.283,000 0.00 52.767.000 52,767,000 0,52 $0 $0 1.17 $0 $0 0.88 $2.325,000 $575.000 0.89 $0 $0 0,35 52.427,000 $1.912.000 0.86 $0 $0 0.86 $0 $0 0,40 $0 $0 0,33 $0 50 0.31 52.346,000 $2,346,000 0.03 $923,000 $923.000 0.00 555,472,000 50 0.89 56,217,000 54,924,000 0,32 $2,242.000 51,883.000 0.65 $0 $0 0.78 $0 $0 0.32 52.410,000 $1,785,000 0,42 $0 50 0.60 50 $0 2,45 50 $0 0.00 $15,851,000 515,851,000 0.58 54,052,000 $3,203.000 2,27 50 $0 0.96 50 $0 3.63 51.725,000 51,725,000 3,03 52.158,000 52.158.000 0.20 $528.000 $528,000 0.71 53,222,000 $3.222.000 1.00 $0 50 1,00 52,638,000 52.638,000 0.35 $0 50 0.00 517,897,000 50 0.27 $0 $0 1.00 $1,319,000 $1.319.000 0.50 50 $0 0.49 51.293.000 $1,293,000 1.12 $5.910,000 $5,910.000 0.00 $3,688,000 $3.688,000 1,53 $1,601,000 $1,601,000 0.29 5759.000 $759.000 1.82 52,400,000 $2,400,000 1.00 50 $0 3.00 $0 $0 0.40 50 $0 0.99 50 50 2.72 014.345.000 $12,319,000 0,79 $1.672,000 51,672,000 2.45 $0 $0 1,74 54,605,000 54,314,000 0.00' 59,222,000 57,849.000 1.61 $0 50 7.39 $0 $0 0.95 $0 $0 2.65 $0 50 0.00' 517.897.000 58.948,000 0.48 $0 50 0.26 5677,000 $677,000 0.26 $0 $0 1.44 $3.789,000 $3,789,000 1.71 $0 $0 0.00' 517,897,000 $5,593,000 0.97 $2,570.000 $2.570.000 0.98 56,848,000 $6,848,000 1.46 50 $0 0.00 $22.132.000 $0 3.05 521.325,000 $21,325,000 1.52 $0 50 0.13 $0 $0 1.20 $0 $0 0.81 50 $0 1.14 $1.114,000 $803,000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 47 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIS1CITY Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Riverside Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporoled Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Norlhwesl Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated Northwest Unincorporated STREETNAME 141h 151 3rd 3rd Adams Adams Adams Buena Vista Canyon Crest Canyon Crest Canyon Crest Canyon Crest Central Central Central Central Chicago Chicago Columbia Columbia Iowa Iowa Iowa JFK La Siena La Sierra La Siena Lemon (NB One way) Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln Madison Madison Magnolia Magnolia Magnolia Magnolia Main Market Marlin Luther King Mission Inn Redwood (SB One way) Traulwein Tyler Tyler Tyler Tyler Tyler University University Victoria Victoria Washington Wood Wood Wood Cantu-Galleano Ranch Dos Lagos (Weirick) El Cerrito El Sobranle Harley John Harley John La Sierra La Siena Mockingbird Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Washington Wood SEGMENTFROM Markel Market SR -91 BNSF Mington SR -91 SR -91 Santa Ana River Martin Luther King Central Country Club Via Vista Chicago SR -91 Alessandro Van Buren Alessandro Spruce Main 1-215 Center 3rd University Trautwein Mington SR -91 Indiana Mission Inn Van Buren Jefferson Washington SR -91 BNSF BNSF Railroad BNSF Tyler Harrison 1st 14th 14th Redwood Mission Inn Alessandro SR -91 SR -91 Magnolia Hole Wells Redwood SR -91 Lincoln Madison Victoria JFK Von Buren Bergamont Hamner Temescal Canyon 1-15 Mockingbird Canyon Washington Scottsdale Victoria El Sobranle Van Buren Ontario Tuscany Dos Lagos Leroy Dawson Canyon I-15 1-15 Park Canyon Hermosa Krameria SEGMENTTO Martin Luther King Main 1-215 railroad crossing SR -91 Lincoln interchange Redwood Centro! Country Club Via Vista Alessandro 1-215/SR-60 Magnolia SR -91 Magnolia Spruce Columbia Iowa interchange 3rd University Martin Luther King Wood SR -91 Indiana Victoria University Jefferson Washington Victoria Victoria railroad crossing Tyler railroad crossing Harrison 14th San Bernardino County Santa Ana River I -215/5R-60 Lemon University Van Buren Magnolia interchange Hole Wells Minglon SR -91 I-215/SR-60 Mington Washington Hermosa Van Buren Bergamonl Krameria W ineville 1-15 Ontario Cajalco Scotlsdale Cajalco El Sobranle Cajalco El Sobranle Tuscany Dos Lagos Leroy Dawson Canyon I-15 interchange Park Canyon Indian Truck Trail Harley John Cajalco MILES TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE 0,89 50 $0 0.08 50 50 1,34 $0 $0 0.00 $36.980,000 $36,980,000 1,56 50 $0 0.54 50 $0 0,00 517,897,000 517.897,000 0.30 50 $0 0,95 50 $0 0.59 $0 50 0.94 52.990.000 $1.855.000 0.68 $0 50 2,15 $0 $0 0.76 $0 $0 2.05 $0 50 3.53 50 $0 3.42 $0 50 0.75 $0 $0 1.09 $0 50 0.00 517,897,000 $17,897,000 2.25 513,815,000 513,815,000 0.51 $0 $0 0.51 53,530.000 $3,265,000 0.48 50 50 3,56 $0 50 0,19 $0 50 0.78 50 $0 0.08 $0 $0 2,00 $0 $0 1,00 $4,331,000 $4,331,000 1.43 58,193,000 $8,193,000 0.86 $0 50 0,00 515,851,800 510,851,000 2,70 50 50 0.00 515,851,000 515,851,000 0.65 50 50 5.98 50 50 2,19 50 50 2.03 $0 $0 2.11 56,340,000 56,340,000 0.79 50 $0 0,08 50 50 2,19 50 $0 0.43 $0 50 0,00' $37.060,000 53,089,000 0,27 50 $0 1.06 $0 $0 1.35 59.443,000 59,443,000 0.86 $0 50 2.01 50 $0 0.16 $0 50 0.52 50 50 2,05 $14,352,000 514,352,000 0,70 $923,000 5923,000 0,11 $0 $0 0,39 $0 $0 0,94 $0 50 0,21 $0 50 0.56 $0 50 1.05 $3,337,000 93,226,000 0,12 50 50 1.19 $3,134,000 $3.134,000 2,22 50 $0 2,36 50 50 3.29 $10,454,000 59,003,000 0,65 51,644,000 5740,000 0,91 50 50 1.10 53,507,000 53,507.000 1.89 55,994,000 $5,994,000 0.28 $0 $0 0.00' 517,897,000 517,897.000 3,41 512,661,000 512,661,000 2.55 $8,094,000 58,094,000 3.96 57,840.000 57.840.000 2.99 57,880,000 57,880,000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 48 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIS1 CIN Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Bunning Pass Banning Pass Bunning Pass Banning Po55 Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Banning Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Beaumont Pass Calimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Colimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Calimesa Pass Unincorporated Pass Unincorporated Pass Unincorporated Pass Unincorporated Pass Unincorporated Pass Unincorporated Pass Unincorporated Pass Unincorporated San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemel San Jacinto Hemel San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto Hemet San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinlo San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinlo San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated San Jacinto Unincorporated STREETNAME 81h Highland Springs Highland Springs Highland Springs Highland Springs 1 -ID Bypass South 1-I D Bypass South 1-10 Bypass South 1-10 Bypass South Lincoln Ramsey Ramsey SR -243 Sun Lakes Sun Lakes Sun Lakes Sunset Sunset Wilson Wilson 151 1st 619 Desert Lown Oak Valley (14th) Oak Valley (141h) Oak Valley (14th) Oak Valley (14th) Oak Valley (STC) Oak Valley (STC) Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Bryant Calimesa Calimesa Tukwet Canyon County Line County Line Desert Lawn Singleton Singleton Singleton Cherry Valley Cherry Valley Cherry Valley Live Oak Canyon Oak Valley (STC) Oak Valley (STC) Cherry Valley Cherry Valley Sanderson Sanderson Sanderson Sanderson Sanderson SR -74 (Honda) SR -74 (Florida) SR-74/SR-79 (Florida) Slate Slate State Slate Stetson Slelson Warren Warren Esplanade Esplanade Esplanade Sanderson SR -79 (North Ramona) SR -79 (San Jacinto) 5R-79 (San Jacinto Slate Slate State State Warren Gilman Springs Gilman Springs SR -79 (Winchester) SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO Wilson 1-10 Wilson (8th) Sun Lakes 1-10 interchange Oak Valley (141h) Wilson (8th) Cherry Valley Oak Valley (14th) 1-10 Morongo Trail (Apache Trail) 1-10 interchange San Gorgonio bridge UP railroad crossing Sunset SR -243 1-10 Blh 81h Highland Springs 1-10 Wesley Highland Horne Sunset Smith Creek bridge Highland Springs Highland Home Ramsey Lincoln 1-10 interchange Highland Home 81h Highland Springs Highland Home Viele Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Highland Springs 1-10 Highland Springs Champions Oak Valley (STC Highland Springs Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Oak View Oak View 1-10 1-10 interchange Beaumont City Limits Cherry Valley (J SI / Central Over Cherry Valley (J St / Central 01-10 6th 1-10 County Line County Line 1 -ID Roberts Roberts 1-10 Palmer Avenue L Condit I-10 Noble 1-10 San Timoleo Wash Oak Valley (STC) San Bernardino County UP Bellflower Highland Springs Acacia Domenigoni RR Crossing Stetson Menlo Warren Columbia Cawston Domenigoni Chambers Florida Stetson Cawston Warren Esplanade Salt Creek Ramona Mountain State Ramona State North Ramona Blvd 7th Ramona Gilman Springs San Jacinto River Quandt Ranch Ramona Sanderson Massacre Canyon Wash SR -74 (Florida) 1st interchange Avenue L 1-10 interchange Palmer Bryanl inlerchonge Champions Condit Roberts interchange Desert Lawn interchange bridge San Bernardino County Beaumont Cily Limits railroad crossing Noble Bellflower Menlo Stetson Acacia RR Crossing Esplanade Cawslon Ramona Columbia Chambers Stetson Esplanade Florida State Cawston Domenigoni bridge Mountain State Warren Esplanade San Jacinto 716 SR -74 Esplanade Quandt Ranch bridge Ramona Esplanade State bridge Domenigoni I4LES TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE 0 54 $0 $0 0.76 32,661,000 $2,661,000 0.00 317,897,000 $17,897,000 0.73 35.128,000 $5,128,000 1.53 $0 $0 329 $22,952,000 $22,952,000 0,00 $17,897,000 $17,897,000 0.00 $2.767,000 $2,767,000 0.00 $18,490,000 $18,490,000 2,01 $0 30 1.70 $0 $0 3.55 $0 $0 0.62 $0 $0 1.00 $13,971.000 $13.971,000 0.00 $3,688,000 33,688,000 1.33 $0 $0 0.28 $0 $0 0.00 $17,897,000 $17.897,000 2.51 $0 $0 1.01 $0 30 128 $0 $0 1,10 $0 $0 2 24 $0 $0 0.99 $912.000 $912,000 1.13 $0 $0 140 $0 $0 0.65 32,270,000 $2.270,000 000 $37,060,000 $11,660,000 3 46 $0 $0 167 $0 $0 0.53 $3.018,000 $3,018,000 0.00 $8,949,000 $0 0,38 $0 $0 0.80 $0 $0 0.00 337,060.000 $37,060,000 0.50 $0 $0 1.86 36.497,000 $6,497,000 0.00 $17.897,000 $17.897,000 1,42 $0 $0 1.86 $11,834,000 $11,834,000 0.85 $0 $0 0,00 337,060,000 $37,060,000 3.40 $0 $0 0.00 $37,060,000 $36,617,000 0.00 $0 $0 2,81 $0 $0 5.65 $0 $0 0.00 318,490,000 $18,490,000 1.47 $7,757,000 $7,757,000 0.44 $0 $0 0.98 $0 $0 1.08 $0 $0 0.42 $0 $0 0.58 $0 $0 1.00 $0 $0 1,02 $0 $0 2.58 $0 $0 4.03 $0 $0 1.31 $0 $0 0.51 $0 $O 1.74 $0 $0 1.25 $9,377,000 $9,377,000 2.52 $0 $0 1.00 32,635,000 $2,635.000 4.99 $13,163,000 $13,163,000 0.00' $2,767,000 $2,490,000 020 $2.794.000 $2,794,000 2,55 $0 50 3.53 $9,320,000 $9,320,000 3.55 $0 50 1.02 $0 $0 0.25 $1,722,000 $1,722,000 2,25 $0 $0 1.99 $0 $0 0 76 32,007,000 $1.138,000 000' 34,611,000 $3,162,000 0 70 $0 $0 3.47 $9.156.000 $9.156.000 2 54 $6,714,000 $3,462,000 000 $923,000 $570,000 3.23' $0 $0 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 49 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DSSLCITY Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Loke Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Loke Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Lake Elsinore Southwest Munieta Southwest Murriela Southwest Munieta Southwest Murriela Southwest Murriela Southwest Murrielo Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murriela Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murriela Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murrieta Southwest Murriela Southwest Murrieta Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Temecula Southwest Unincorporaled Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Unincorporated Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Southwest Wildomar Schiele! TWaf4 Network Transit AdminlstraHon MSHCP Total STREETN,M4E Corydon Diamond Franklin (integral to Railroad Gand Grand Lake Lake Lake Mission Nichols Nichols SR -74 (Collier/Riverside) SR -74 (Grand) SR -74 (Riverside) Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon California Oaks California Oaks California Oaks Jackson Jefferson Jefferson Jeflerson Keller Keller Los Alamos Murrieta Hol Springs Murrieta Hot Springs Murriela Hol Springs Nutmeg Whitewood Whilewood Whitewood Ynez Jefferson Margarita Old Town Front Pechanga Pkwy Pechanga Pkwy Rancho California Rancho California Rancho California Rancho California SR -79 (Temecula Pkwy( SR -79 (Temecula Pkwy) Briggs Butterfield Stage Butterfield Stage Butterfield Stage Butterfield Stage Butterfield Stage Butterfield Stage Butterfield Stage Butterfield Stage Horsethief Canyon Indian Truck Trail Murrieta Hot Springs Pala Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon Baxter Bailer Bundy Canyon Central Central Grand Grand Mission Palomar Palomar SEGIENTfBOM Mission Mission 1-15 Lincoln Tot 1-15 1-15 Temescal Wash Railroad Canyon 1-15 1-15 1-15 Riverside Lakeshore I-15 Temescal Wash Jefferson 1-15 Jackson Whitewood Palomar Nutmeg Murrieta Hol Springs 1-215 1-215 Jeflerson Jefferson 1-215 Margarita Jefferson Clinton Keith Los Alamos Murriela Hot Springs Jackson Cherry Murrieta Hot Springs Rancho California SR -79 (Temecula Pkwy) Via Gilberto Jefferson 1-15 Margarita Butterfield Stage 1-15 Pechanga Pkwy Scott Murrieta Hot Springs Calle Chapos La Serena Rancho California Pauba SR -79 (Winchester) Auld Tucalota Creek Temescal Canyon Temescal Canyon 512-79 (Winchester) Pechanga Horsethief Canyon Wash Indian Truck Troll Indian Wash 1-15 1-15 Mission Baxter Grand Ortega Corydon Bundy Canyon Clinton Keith Mission SEGMENT10 Canna 1-15 interchange Toll SR -74 (Riverside) Lincoln interchange bridge Bundy Canyon Lake interchange Lakeshore SR -74 (Ortega) Grand Lake bridge 1-15 Jackson Clinton Keith Ynez Nutmeg Murriela Hot Springs Cherry Whitewood interchange 1-215 1-215 Margarita SR -79 (Winchester) Clinton Keith Los Alamos Murriela Hot Springs Jackson SR -79 (Winchester) Rancho California SR -79 (Temecula Pkwy) I-15/SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Via Gilberto Pechanga Pkwy Margarita interchange Butterfield Stage Glen Oaks Pechanga Pkwy Butterfield Stage SR -79 (Winchester) Calle Chapos La Serena Rancho California Pauba SR -79 (Temecula Pkwy) Auld Murriela Hot Springs bridge 1-15 1-15 Pourroy San Diego County bridge 1-15 bridge Palomar interchange 1-15 Palomar Palomar Corydon Central Palomar Jefferson anion/faith MILES TOTAL COST MA10MLfM T41MF SHARE 1,53 $2,019.000 $2019,000 0 24 $0 $0 0,00 $37.060.000 $14,629,000 1.29 $0 00 0,86 $1,357,000 $1,357,000 3.10 $14,794,000 $13,592,000 0.00 $17,897,000 $7,291.000 0.00 $1,973,000 $822,000 2.39 $0 $0 1.80 $3,324,000 53.324,000 0.00 $37,060,000 $37,060,000 2.10 829,357,000 $28,315,000 0.64 $8,892,000 07.495,000 1.74 821.830,000 021.830,000 1.21 $3.846,000 03,846.000 0.00 $2,270,000 $2.270,000 0.32 $555,000 $555,000 0.50 50 50 1.76 $0 $0 0.53 $0 $0 1.02 $2,691,000 $2.691,000 2.37 $21,520,000 521,520,000 2.26 $0 $0 0.75 $1,571,000 $1,571,000 0.00 $17,897,000 $17,897,000 1.77 $0 $0 1 11 $0 50 1.48 $0 $0 1-01 $2,660,000 $2,660,000 1,97 $0 $0 2.01 $0 50 1.93 50 $0 0.80 $8,066,000 $8,066,000 1.22 $0 $0 2.29 $0 50 7.38 50 $0 1.45 50 $0 1,32 $0 $0 1,44 $0 $0 1.89 $6,824,000 $6.824,000 0.00 $17,897.000 $12,009,000 1.96 50 $0 4.26' $32.064.000 $32,064,000 0 64 01,692,000 $1,576,000 308 $0 $0 339 $8,950,000 58,950,000 0 82 $0 $0 0.70 $0 $0 0.90 $2,860,000 $2.860,000 0.85 $0 50 1 69 $269,000 $269,000 2 28 $7,245,000 $7.245.000 2 23 814,172,000 $14,172,000 0.00' $3.688,000 53,688,000 0.17 $0 $0 0.18 50 $0 1.75 $0 $0 1.38 $0 50 0.00 $2,214,000 $2,214,000 2,57 $8.166,000 $8,166,000 0.00 $941,000 $941,000 0,37 $974,000 5921,000 0,00' 017,897,000 $7.159.000 0.94 $6,537,000 $6,537.000 0.74 $5,143,000 $5,143,000 0.51 $3,570,000 $3,570,000 4,96 $34,648.000 $25,011,000 2.02' $0 00 0.84 $0 $0 0,74 $1,941,000 51,691,000 2.79 07.358.03 17.358.000 17399 81.833,495,000 11.484,916.500 726.37 1 1.446.070.002 3 2,713.07100 $ 153,120,000 '$ 92,639,000 $ 112,220.400 $ 112,220,400 $ 45.401,000 $ 43,308,000 $ 3,756,761,400 $ 2961,038,400 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 50 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Table 4.5 - TUMF Transit Cost Estimates AREA PLAN DIST LEAD AGENCY PROJECT NAME LOCATION UNITS (number/ length in mtlesl UNIT COST TOTAL MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest RTA Riverside Mobility Hub al Vine Street Riverside i H.900.00(1 M $.162,01100 Central RTA Moreno Valley Mobility Hub Moreno Valley 1 $9,000,000 $9.000.000 85,445,000 Northwest RTA Jurupa Valley Mobility Hub Jurupa Valley 1 $9,000,000 $9,O00,000 $5,445,000 Pass RSA Banning Mobility Hub Banning 1 $9,000,000 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 Southwest RTA Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Mobility Hb Lake Elsinore 1 $9,000,000 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 Southwest RTA Temecula/Murrieta Mobility Hub Temecula t $9.000.000 $9,000,000 55,445,000 San Jacinro RTA Hemet Mobility Hub Hemet 1 $9,000.000 $9.000.000 $5,445,000 San Jacinto RTA Son Jacinto Mobility Hub San Jacinto 1 $9,000,000 $9J]IXJdxlO 55,445,000 San Jacinto RTA MI. San Jacinto College Mobility Hub San Jacinto 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 5605,000 Regional RTA Regional Operations and Maintenance Facilit Riverside 1 $50,000,000 $50,000,000 $30,251,000 Regional RTA Annual Transit Enhancements Program Various locations region wid 290 $40.000 $11400,000 $7,018,000 Central RTA Central Corridor RapidLink Implementation UCR, Riverside to Perris 421 $60.000 $2.520.000 $1,525,000 Regional RTA Vehicle Fleet Medium Buses Various locations region wid 7 $155,000 $1.085,000 $656,000 Regional RTA Vehicle Fleet Large Buses Various locations region wid 29 $585,000 516,965,000 510.264,000 Regional RTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis Study Various locations region wid t $950,000` 5950.000 $575,000 Total $153,120,000 $92.639,000 4.8 TUMF Network Evaluation To assess the effectiveness of the proposed TUMF Network improvements to mitigate the cumulative regional impact of new development in Western Riverside County, the proposed network improvements were added to the 2015 existing network in RivTAM and the model was run with 2040 socioeconomic data to determine the relative impacts on horizon year traffic conditions. To quantify the impacts of the TUMF Network improvements, the various traffic measures of effectiveness described in Section 3.1 for the 2012 Baseline and 2040 No -Build scenarios were again calculated for the 2040 TUMF Build scenario. The results for VMT, VHT, VHD, and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E) were then compared to the results presented in Table 3.1 for the no -build conditions. The 2040 TUMF Build comparison results are provided in Table 4.6. Plots of the Network Extents are attached in Appendix H. As shown in Table 4.6, the 2040 VMT on arterial facilities experiencing LOS of E or worse will decrease with the addition of the TUMF Network improvements while the share of VMT on the regional arterial highway system experiencing daily LOS E or worse will be reduced to 38% (which is still above the level experienced in 2012). It should be noted that the total VMT on the arterial system increases as a result of freeway trips being diverted to the arterial system to benefit from the proposed TUMF improvements. Despite a greater share of the total VMT in 2040, the arterial system is able to more efficiently accommodate the increased demand with the proposed TUMF improvements. Although VMT on the TUMF improved arterial system increases by approximately 9% in 2040 compared to the No Build condition, VHT on the arterial system decreases by approximately 11% indicating traffic is able to move more efficiently. Additionally, a notable benefit is observed on the freeway system with VMT and VHT being substantially reduced following TUMF Network improvements. By completing TUMF improvements, the total VHD experienced by all area motorists would be reduced by over one third from the levels that would be experienced under the 2040 No -Build scenario. These results highlight the overall effectiveness of the TUMF Program to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development commensurate with the level of impact being created. WRCOG 51 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 Table 4.6 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2012 Baseline and 2040 No -Build Scenarios to 2040 TUMF Build Scenario) Measure of Performance* Peak Periods (Total) 2012 Baseline 2040 No -Build 2040 Build VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 19,532,437 29,277,587 31,022,272 VMT - FREEWAYS 11,019,155 14,487.570 13,41 1,377 VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 8,513,282 14,790,016 17,610,895 TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 5,585,202 9,089,495 9,902,433 VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 575,154 1,361,907 1,180,647 VHT - FREEWAYS 296,542 736,433 530,849 VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 278,611 625,474 649,797 TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 181,151 396,981 354,639 VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 175,765 739,075 489,238 VHD - FREEWAYS 117,430 502,549 312,669 VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 58,334 236,527 176,569 TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 45,080 172,944 114,833 VMT LOS E - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 6,188,644 16,966,992 14.299,498 VMT LOS E - FREEWAYS 4,532,703 10,156,363 8,982,566 VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 1,655,941 6,810,629 5,316,932 TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 1,462,061 5,160,911 3,735,762 of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 26% 57% 38% * Based on RivTAM 2012 network provided by Riverside County Transportation Department and SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2015 arterial network completed by WSP, September 2016. NOTES: Volume is adjusted by PCE factor VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free-flow (ideal) travel time) LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios). LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan. WRCOG 52 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 5.0 TUMF NEXUS ANALYSIS The objective of this section is to evaluate and document the rational nexus (or reasonable relationship) between the proposed fee and the transportation system improvements it will be used to help fund. The analysis starts by documenting the correlation between future development and the need for transportation system improvements on the TUMF network to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of this new development, followed by analysis of the nexus evaluation of the key components of the TUMF concept. 5.1 Future Development and the Need for Improvements Previous sections of this report documented the projected residential and employment growth in Western Riverside County, the expected increases in traffic congestion and travel delay, and the identification of the transportation system improvements that will serve these future inter -community travel demands. The following points coalesce this information in a synopsis of how the future growth relates to the need for improvements to the TUMF system. ➢ Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing. Development in Western Riverside County is expected to continue at a robust rate of growth into the foreseeable future. Current projections estimate the population is projected to grow from a level of approximately 1.77 million in 2012 to a future level of about 2.43 million in 2040, while employment is projected to grow from a level of about 461,000 in 2012 to approximately 861,000 in 2040 (as shown in Table 2.3). ➢ Continuing growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways. Traffic congestion and delay on arterial roadways are projected to increase dramatically in the future (as shown in Table 3.1). Without improvements to the transportation system, congestion levels will grow rapidly and travelers will experience unacceptable travel conditions with slow travel speeds and lengthy delays. ➢ The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to future development in Western Riverside County. Traffic using arterial roadways within Western Riverside County is virtually all generated within or attracted to Western Riverside County, since longer -distance trips passing through the region typically use the freeway system, not arterial roadways. Therefore, the future recurring congestion problems on these roadways will be attributable to new trips that originate in, terminate in, or travel within Western Riverside County. ➢ Capacity improvements to the transportation system wilt be needed to alleviate the future congestion caused by new development. To maintain transportation service at or near its current levels of efficiency, capacity enhancements will need to be made to the arterial roadway system. These enhancements could include new or realigned roads, additional lanes on existing WRCOG 53 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 roads, new or expanded bridges, new or upgraded freeway interchanges, or grade separation of at -grade rail crossings. The completion of improvements to the arterial roadway system would enhance regional mobility, and reduce the total peak period vehicles hours of travel (VHT) by approximately 13%, reduce peak period vehicle hours of delay (VHD) by approximately 34%, and reduce the share of traffic experiencing congestion in the peak periods by 16% (as shown in Table 4.6). The specific needs and timing of implementation will depend on the location and rate of future development, so the specific improvements to be funded by the TUMF and their priority of implementation will be determined during future project programming activities as improvement needs unfold and as TUMF funds become available. D Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program. The criteria used to identify roads for the TUMF network (future number of lanes, future traffic volume, future congestion level, and roadway function linking communities and activity centers and serving public transportation) were selected to ensure that these are the roadways that will serve inter -community travel and will require future improvement to alleviate congestion. D Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automobile travel. Since a portion of the population does not own an automobile and depends on public transportation for mobility, the public transportation infrastructure and service will need to be enhanced and expanded to ensure continued mobility for this segment of the population. In addition, improvements to the public transportation system will be required to ensure that transit service can function as a viable option for future new Western Riverside County residents and employees who choose to avoid congestion by using public transportation. For the reasons cited above, it can be readily concluded that there is a rational nexus between the future need for transportation improvements on the TUMF system and the future development upon which the proposed TUMF would be levied. The following sections evaluate the rational nexus in relation to the system components and the types of uses upon which the fee is assessed. 5.2 Application of Fee to System Components As noted in Section 3.2, the TUMF concept includes splitting the fee revenues between the backbone system of arterials, the secondary system of arterials, and the public transportation system. This section evaluates the travel demands to determine the rational nexus between the future travel demands and the use of the fee to fund improvements to the future system components. The split of fee revenues between the backbone and secondary highway networks is related to the proportion of highway vehicle trips that are relatively local (between WRCOG 54 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 adjacent communities) and longer distance (between more distant communities but still within Western Riverside County). To estimate a rational fee split between the respective networks, the future combined AM and PM peak period travel forecast estimates were aggregated to a matrix of trips between zones to show the percentage of trips that remain within each zone in relation to the volume that travels to the other zones. This analysis was completed using the Year 2040 No -Build scenario trip tables from RivTAM. The first step in the analysis was to create a correspondence table between the TAZs in the model and the five WRCOG TUMF zones (i.e. Northwest, Southwest, Central, Hemet/San Jacinto and Pass). The TAZs were then compressed into six districts (the five WRCOG zones and one for the rest of the SCAG region). Table 5.1 shows the estimated peak period vehicle trips within and between each of the zones. Table 5.2 shows the percentage of peak period vehicle trips within and between the respective zones. Appendix I includes the detailed RivTAM outputs used to develop the regional trip distribution profile shown in Table 5.1 and 5.2. Table 5.1 - 2040 Peak Period Vehicle Trips By WRCOG Zone To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 285,556 15,102 60,146 6,274 34,821 41,799 443,699 Hemet/San Jacinto 14,876 190,792 7,396 5,256 17,138 13,851 249,310 Northwest 64,066 8,082 742,299 6,569 25,648 211,686 1,058,350 Pass 6,721 5,563 6,536 103,901 1,791 32,830 157,341 Southwest 34,785 17,514 24,135 1,785 452,345 28,424 558,988 Outside WRCOG 43,352 14,690 212,699 33,337 29,242 333,320 TOTAL 449,357 251,743 1,053,210 157,123 560,984 328,590 2,801,008 Based on RivTAM Year 2040 No -Build scenario Table 5.2 - 2040 Percent Peak Period Vehicle Trips By WRCOG Zone To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 64.4% 3.4% 13.6% 1.4% 7.8% 9.4% 100% Hemet/San Jacinto 6.0% 76.5% 3.0% 2.1% 6.9% 5.6% 100% Northwest 6.1% 0.8% 70.1% 0.6% 2.4% 20.0% 100% Pass 4.3% 3.5% 4.2% 66.0% 1.1% 20.9% 100% Southwest 6.2% 3.1% 4.3% i 0.3% 80.9% 5.1% 100% Based on RivTAM Year 2040 No -Build scenario WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 55 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Table 5.3 summarizes the calculation of the split between the backbone and secondary highway networks as derived from the peak period trip values provided in Table 5.1. Peak period vehicle trips to and from areas outside Western Riverside County were subtracted from the calculation, on the presumption that most of their inter- regional travel would occur on the freeway system. Peak period trips between zones (regional) were assigned to the backbone network, since these trips are primarily served by the arterial roadways that provide connections between the zones. Peak period trips within zones (local) were split between the backbone network and the secondary network in proportion to their lane -miles, since roadways on both networks serve intra -zonal trips. The backbone network includes approximately 40.5% of the lane -miles on the future TUMF system, and the secondary network includes approximately 59.5% of the lane -miles. The backbone network is therefore assigned all of the inter -zonal peak period trips plus 40.5% of the intra -zonal peak period trips. The secondary network is assigned 59.5% of the intra -zonal peak period trips and none of the inter -zonal peak period trips. The overall result is that 50.7% of the regional travel is assigned to the backbone network and 49.3% is assigned to the secondary network. Table 5.3 - Backbone -Secondary Network Share Calculation Calculation Value Description Input Values Backbone Value Backbone Share Secondary Value Secondary Share Total Western Riverside County Peak Period Vehicle Trips1 2,801.008 Less Internal/External Peak Period Vehicle Trips 661,q 10 Total Peak Period Vehicle Trips Internal to Western Riverside County 2,139,098 Peak Period Vehicle Trips Between TUMF Zones 364,205 49 Peak Period Vehicle Trips Within TUMF Zones 1,774,893 , TUMF Future Network Lane Miles 3,151.1 1,277.7 40.5% 1,873.4 ,S .`;7t, Peak Period Vehicle Trips Between TUMF Zones 364,205 364,205 100.0% 0 0.0% Peak Period Vehicle Trips Within TUMF Zones (as share of intra- zonal trips) 1,774,893 719,679 40.5% 1,055,214 59.5% Total Peak Period Vehicle Trips Assigned 2,139,098 _ 1,083,884 50.7% 1,055,214 49.3% Based on RivTAM Year 2040 No -Build scenario; TUMF Nexus Study Exhibit H-2 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 56 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 5.3 Application of Fee to Residential and Non -Residential Developments In order to establish the approximate proportionality of the future traffic impacts associated with new residential development and new non-residential development, the growth in peak period VMT between the 2012 Baseline and 2040 No -Build Scenarios from RivTAM were aggregated by trip purpose. RivTAM produces person trips (irrespective of mode choice) on the basis of five trip purposes: home -based -work (HBW), home -based -other (HBO), home -based -school (HBSC), work -based -other (WBO), and other -based -other (OBO). NCHRP Report #187 Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters User's Guide (Transportation Research Board, 1978) details operational travel estimation techniques that are universally used for the travel demand modeling. Chapter 2 of this report, which details trip generation estimation, states that "HBW (Home Based Work) and HBNW (Home Based Non Work) trips are generated at the households, whereas the NHB (Non -Home Based) trips are generated elsewhere." In accordance with NCHRP Report # 187, growth in peak period VMT was aggregated into home-based growth in peak period VMT (combining the first three purposes: HBW, HBO, HBS) and non -home-based growth in peak period VMT (combining the last two purposes: WBO, OBO). The home-based growth in peak period VMT represent 71.0% of the total future growth in VMT in the peak periods, and the non -home-based growth in peak period VMT represent 29.0% of the total future growth in VMT in the peak period as shown in Table 5.4. Appendix J includes the RivTAM outputs used to develop the trip purpose summary in Table 5.4. Table 5.4 - Peak Period VMT Growth by Trip Purpose for Western Riverside County (2012 - 2040) VEHICLE TRIP PURPOSE 2012 BASELINE PEAK PERIOD VMT 2040 NO -BUILD PEAK PERIOD VMT PEAK PERIOD VMT GROWTH PEAK PERIOD VMT GROWTH SHARE Home -Based -Work 5,849,895 8,331,921 2,482,026 52.9% Home -Based -Other 2,214,102 2,932.929 718,827 15.3% Home -Based -School (K-12) 413,303 542,911 129,608 2.8% Work -Based -Other 945.539 1 1,583,034 637.496 13.6% Other -Based -Other 1,772,020 2,493.667 721,647 15.4% TOTAL 11,194,859 15.884.463 4.689.605 100.00% Home -Based Trips (Residential Uses 3,330,462 71.0% Non -Home -Based Trips (Non -Residential Uses) 1,359,143 29.0% Based on RivTAM Year 2012 Baseline Scenario, September 2016 and RivTAM Year 2040 No Build Scenario, September 2016 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 57 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 6.0 FAIR -SHARE FEE CALCULATION The fee amounts, by type of development, that are justified to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development on transportation facilities in Western Riverside County are quantified in this section. The total cost of improving the TUMF system is $3.76 billion. Existing funding obligated for improvements to the TUMF system totals $303.5 million while unfunded improvement needs generated by existing development represent $492.2 million of the total cost. The balance of the unfunded TUMF system improvement needs is $2.96 billion which is the maximum value attributable to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development in the WRCOG region, and will be captured through the TUMF Program. By levying the uniform fee directly on future new developments (and indirectly on new residents and new employees to Western Riverside County), these transportation system users are assigned their "fair share" of the costs to address the cumulative impacts of additional traffic they will generate on the regional transportation system. Of the $2.96 billion in unfunded future improvement needs, 71.0% ($2.10 billion) will be assigned to future new residential development and 29.0% ($858.7 million) will be assigned to future new non-residential development. 6.1 Residential Fees The portion of the unfunded future improvement cost allocable to new residential development through the TUMF is $2.10 billion. Since this future transportation system improvement need is generated by new residential development anticipated through the Year 2040, the fee will be spread between the residential developments projected to be constructed between 2012 and 2040. The projected residential growth from year 2012 to 2040 is 250,082 households (or dwelling units) as is indicated in Table 2.3. Different household types generate different numbers of trips. To reflect the difference in trip generation between lower density "single-family" dwelling units and higher density "multi -family" dwelling units, the TUMF was weighted based on the respective trip generation rates of these different dwelling unit types. For the purposes of the TUMF Program, single family dwelling units are those housing units with a density of less than 8 units per acre while multi -family units are those with a density of 8 or more units per acre. According to the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS forecasts included in Table 2.3 and Appendix B, single family dwelling units (including mobile homes) are forecast to constitute 69.2% of the growth in residential dwelling units in the region between 2012 and 2040. Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Ninth Edition (2012) show that, on average, single-family dwelling units generate 9.52 vehicle trips per dwelling unit per day, whereas apartments, condominiums and townhouses (considered to be representative of higher density multi -family dwelling units) generate a median of 6.20 vehicle trips per unit per day. The growth in dwelling units for single-family and multi -family, respectively, were multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates to determine the weighted proportion of the WRCOG 58 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 change in trips attributable to each use type as the basis for determining the per unit fee required to levy the necessary $2.10 billion to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new residential development. Table 6.1 summarizes the calculation of the fee for single-family and multi -family dwelling units. Appendix K includes worksheets detailing the calculation of the residential (and non-residential) TUMF for Western Riverside County. Table 6.1 - Fee Calculation for Residential Share Residential Sector 2012 Dwelling Units 2040 Dwelling Units Dwelling Unit Change Trip Generation Rate Trip Change Percentage of Trip Change Fee/DU Single -Family 366,588 539,631 173,043 9.52 1,647,369 77.5% $9,418 Multi -Family 158,561 235,600 77,039 6.20 477,642 22.5% $6,134 Total 525,149 775,231 250,082 2,125,011 100.0% Household data based on SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS and WSP, April 2016; Trip Generation based on ITE Trio Generation (2012). 6.2 Non -Residential Fees The portion of the unfunded future improvement cost allocable to new non-residential development through the TUMF is $858.7 million. Estimates of employment by sector were obtained from the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS socioeconomic data included in Table 2.3 and Appendix B. From the 2040 employment forecast, the amount of employee growth in each sector was calculated. The employment figures were then translated into square footage of new development using typical ratios of square feet per employee derived from four sources including: Cordoba Corporation/Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas (PBQD), Land Use Density Conversion Factors For Long Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, August 20, 1990; Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County Subarea Model Guidelines Manual, June 2001; SCAG, Employment Density Study, October 31, 2001; and the County of Riverside, General Plan, As Amended December 15, 2015. Worksheets showing the development of the TUMF employee conversion factors and the application of the conversion factors to calculate the square footage of future new non-residential development in Western Riverside County are included in Appendix L. To account for the differences in trip generation between various types of non- residential uses, the new non-residential development was weighted by trip generation rate for each sector. Typical trip generation rates per employee were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation -- Ninth Edition (2012), and were weighted based on a calculated value of trips per employee as derived from the employee conversion factors and ITE typical trip generation rates per square foot of development, before being assigned to the non-residential categories as follows: Industrial - 3.8 trips per employee, Retail - 16.2 trips per employee, Service - 4.6 trips per WRCOG 59 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 employee, and Government/Public - 12.0 trips per employee11. These rates were applied to the employment growth in each sector to determine the relative contribution of each sector to new trip -making, and the $858.7 million was then allocated among the non-residential categories on the basis of the percentage of new trips added. This proportionate non-residential fee share by sector was then divided by the estimated square footage of future new development to obtain the rate per square foot for each type of use. The calculation of the non-residential fee by sector is shown in Table 6.2. Table 6.2 - Fee Calculation for Non -Residential Share Non -Residential Sector Employment Change Trip Generation Rate per Employee Trip Change Percentage of Trip Change Change in Square Feet of Gross Floor Area Fee/SF Industrial 80,592 3.8 302,220 13.4% 64,710,138 $1.77 Retail 35,841 16.2 i 580,624 25.7% 17,920,500 $12.31 Service 274,720 4.6 1,263,712 55.9% 105,211,915 $4.56 Government/Public 9,515 12.0 114,180 5.1% 2,696,349 $16.08 Total 400,668 2,260,736 100.0% 190,538,901 Employment Change data based on SCAG 20 6 RTP/SCS; Trip Generation based on ITE (2012); Change in Square Feet conversion factor based on Cordoba (1990), OCTA (2001), SCAG (2001) and County of Riverside (2015). 11 The median trip generation rate for 'Retail' and 'Service' was reduced to reflect the influence of pass -by trips using the weekday PM peak median pass -by trip rate for select uses as derived from the ITE Trio Generation Handbook (June 2004). WRCOG 60 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update July 10, 2017 7.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the Nexus Study evaluation, it can be seen that there is reasonable relationship between the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the need to mitigate these transportation impacts using funds levied through the ongoing TUMF Program. Factors that reflect this reasonable relationship include: ➢ Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing as a result of future new development. ➢ Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways. ➢ The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County. ➢ Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development. ➢ Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program. ➢ Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automobile travel. The Nexus Study evaluation has established a proportional "fair share" of the improvement cost attributable to new development based on the impacts of existing development and the availability of obligated funding through traditional sources. Furthermore, the Nexus Study evaluation has divided the fair share of the cost to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of future new development in Western Riverside County in rough proportionality to the cumulative impacts of future residential and non-residential development in the region. The respective fee allocable to future new residential and non-residential development in Western Riverside County is summarized for differing use types in Table 7.1. Table 7.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County Land Use Type Units Development Change Fee Per Unit Total Revenue ($ million) Single Family Residential DU 173,043 $9,418 $1,629.8 Multi Family Residential DU 77,039 $6,134 $472.5 Industrial SF GFA 64,710,138 $1.77 $1 14.8 Retail SF GFA 17,920,500 $12.31 $220.5 Service SF GFA 105,21 1,915 $4.56 $480.0 Government/Public SF GFA 2,696,349 $16.08 $43.4 MAXIMUM TUMF VALUE $2,961.0 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2016 Program Update 61 Adopted WRCOG Executive Committee July 10, 2017 Item No. 5 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Michael Heslin, Director of Information Technology and Support Services DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with Park Consulting Group for Technology Services PREPARED BY: Paula Crowell, IT Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Second Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement with Park Consulting Group to extend the term to June 30, 2019, and to increase the authorized contract amount in the amount of $100,000 for technology services, for a total agreement amount of $150,000. BACKGROUND: In October 2016, the City entered into an agreement with Park Consulting Group for consulting services to assist the City with activities associated with support, upgrades and enhancements for enterprise applications in the amount of $30,000. On February 14, 2017, the City entered into the First Amendment to this agreement, increasing the total agreement amount to $50,000. Consulting services are being utilized to supplement existing staff due to vacancies and meet technology support requirements. The proposed Second Amendment would extend the Term of the agreement to June 30, 2019, and increase the authorized contract amount. Consulting services are being utilized to supplement existing staff due to vacancies, meet technology operational goals, and project target dates. The approval of this Second Amendment will provide the ITSS Department spending approval for funds that are available within the Department's Fiscal Year 2017-2018 budget. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the Information Technology Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2017-2018. Adequate funds for Fiscal Years for 2018-19 shall be programmed in the operating budgets. ATTACHMENT: Second Amendment SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND PARK CONSULTING GROUP THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 22, 2017, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Park Consulting Group, an S Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On October 24, 2016, the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Contractor Services," in the amount of $30,000. b. On Feb 14, 2017, the City and Contractor entered First Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Contractor Services," to increase the payment in the amount of $20,000. c. The parties now desire to extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2019, and increase the payment in the amount of $100,000, and amend the Agreement set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" at paragraph is hereby amended to read as follows: This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2019, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Second Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for additional contractor services total Agreement amount of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000). 4. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachments "A" to this Amendment, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full in Attachment A. 5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA PARK CONSULTING GROUP By: By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor Glenn Park, Principal Consultant (Sole Signer) ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Park Consulting Group Inc. Glenn Park 25 Snowberry Dr. Lake Forest, CA 92630 Tel/Direct: (626) 224-1656 glenn@parkcgp.com 2 PM Initials: Date: (- ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule Consultant shall be paid for services rendered in accordance with Section 4 of the Agreement, and described above under Tasks to be Performed, a not -to -exceed amount of One Hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). Services performed within the Tasks to be Performed, will be at the rate of $130.00 per hour. Consultant shall be paid monthly as services are performed. Additional Services shall be computed at the actual hourly rates listed below: POSITION 2017/18 RATE* PROJECT MANAGER $130/HR *Rates increase 4% each July 1, subject to approval by City. **Exhibit B has been modified to include the new agreement amount of $150,000.00. 3 Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Michelle's Place for the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope (At the Request of Economic Development Committee Mayor Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Community Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Michelle's Place for city -support costs, in the amount of $250 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope. BACKGROUND: Staff received a sponsorship request from Michelle's Place to provide city -support costs for the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope to be held on September 24, 2017. The Economic Development Committee of the City Council (Mayor Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) met on March 28, 2017, to review the budget on this special event and recommended support at the levels indicated in the staff report. The Michelle's Place Walk of Hope will serve as a fundraiser for Michelle's Place, a local non- profit organization serving the Temecula Valley. Michelle's Place was founded in 2001 to provide support and resources to women battling breast cancer, as well as to educated the community about breast cancer prevention and detection. Michelle's Place has implemented programs and services to help women make informed decisions and to encourage women to take action for their breast health. The Michelle's Place Walk for Hope will include a 5k walk beginning and ending at Vail Headquarters followed by vendors, live entertainment, and a fun zone for kids and dogs. The anticipated attendance at this Autumnfest event is approximately 1,500 people. FISCAL IMPACT: The City—support costs of $250 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415 are included in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MICHELLE'S PLACE THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 22nd day of August, 2017, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Michelle's Place, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall operate the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope (hereinafter referred to as the "Event") on September 24, 2017. The Event is a special event which is beginning and ending at Vail Headquarters. b. The Event includes a 5k walk, fun zone for kids and dogs, vendors and live entertainment. c. Alcohol will not be served. d. The City desires to be a Co -Sponsor of the Event. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 22, 2017, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2017, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in-kind city -support services valued at an amount not to exceed Two Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($250.00) and in-kind promotional services valued at an amount not to exceed Eleven Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen Dollars and No Cents ($11,415.00), as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co -Sponsor of the Event. As a Co -Sponsor the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. 4. WRITTEN REPORT Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the Event, the Nonprofit shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Event, its attendance, media coverage, and description of the materials in which the City has listed as a Co -Sponsor. The report shall also include samples of media, press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc., in a presentation notebook format. In addition, complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event must be included in such a written report. 5. PERMITS The Nonprofit shall file applications for a Special Event Permit with the City no later than thirty (30) days prior to the first day of the Event. The City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of Conditions of Approval. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval for the Special Event Permit, or any other City -issued permits. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval of such permits shall constitute a default of this Agreement and is grounds for termination of this Agreement. 6. MEETING ATTENDANCE The Nonprofit shall attend all City pre -event planning meetings and event recap meetings if warranted. 7. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 8. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by August 21, 2017, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 9. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 12. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: To Recipient: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Michelle's Place Attn: Kim Gerrish 27645 Jefferson Ave, Suite 117 Temecula, CA 92590 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 17. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney MICHELLE'S PLACE (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Kim Gerrish, Executive Director By: Marilyn Watson, President NONPROFIT Michelle's Place Attn: Kim Gerrish 27645 Jefferson Ave, Suite 117 Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 699-5455 kgerrish@michellesplace.org PM Initials: Date: (-- EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS CO-SPONSOR Michelle's Place shall provide the following benefits and services for the citizens of the City of Temecula: • City of Temecula logo/name on advertisements • City of Temecula name on all press releases • City of Temecula logo/name on event poster • City of Temecula logo/name on event flyers • (5) Event T-shirts **Press Releases will be distributed to all local media, however, publication cannot be guaranteed. Press Releases can also be provided to all sponsors for distribution to their clients, agents, employees, etc. EXHIBIT "B" IN-KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope event. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event: Police: $ 0.00 Fire: $ 0.00 Public Works: $ 0.00 Community Services: $ 250.00 TOTAL: $ 250.00 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The estimated value for in-kind promotional assistance provided by The City of Temecula for the Michelle's Place Walk of Hope is as follows: Item Value Auto Mall Marque Appears approximately once every 4'/ minutes Cable Channel Event slide appears approximately once per hour for 30 seconds City Website Event listing on the City of Temecula's event calendar Promotional Poster 42X66 poster located in the concourse at the Civic Center $ 3,115.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 1,000.00 TOTAL VALUE: $ 11,415.00 Item No. 7 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild for the 2017 Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show (At the Request of Economic Development Committee Mayor Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Community Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild for city -support costs, in the amount of $1,900 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the 2017 Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show. BACKGROUND: Staff received a sponsorship request from Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild to provide city -support costs for the 2017 Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show to be held on October 7, 2017. The Economic Development Committee of the City Council (Mayor Edwards and Council Member Comerchero) met on March 28, 2017, to review the budget on this special event and recommended support at the levels indicated in the staff report. The Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show will serve as a fundraiser for Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild, a local non-profit charitable, educational and social organization formed in 1990. Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild promotes the knowledge of and appreciation for all aspects of quilting and fiber arts with an active philanthropy program. Following the 2016 Quilt Show, Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild was able to donate money to the Temecula, Murrieta Community Panty, 4Paws 4 Patriots and Roundup Hope. The 19th annual Old Town Temecula Quilt Show will include beautiful displays of quilts hanging throughout Old Town, a live large quilt auction, a small silent auction and craft vendors. The anticipated attendance at this yearly Autumnfest event is approximately 500 people. FISCAL IMPACT: The City—support costs of $1,900 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415 are included in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND VALLEY OF THE MIST QUILT GUILD THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 22nd day of August, 2017, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall operate the Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show (hereinafter referred to as the "Event") on October 7, 2017. The Event is a special event which is located throughout Old Town Temecula. b. The Event includes quilts on display throughout Old Town, a live large quilt auction, a small quilt silent auction and craft vendors. c. Alcohol will not be served. d. The City desires to be a Co -Sponsor of the Event. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 22, 2017, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2017, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in-kind city -support services valued at an amount not to exceed One Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($1,900.00) and in-kind promotional services valued at an amount not to exceed Eleven Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen Dollars and No Cents ($11,415.00), as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co -Sponsor of the Event. As a Co -Sponsor the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. 4. WRITTEN REPORT Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the Event, the Nonprofit shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Event, its attendance, media coverage, and description of the materials in which the City has listed as a Co -Sponsor. The report shall also include samples of media, press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc., in a presentation notebook format. In addition, complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event must be included in such a written report. 5. PERMITS The Nonprofit shall file applications for a Special Event Permit with the City no later than thirty (30) days prior to the first day of the Event. The City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of Conditions of Approval. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval for the Special Event Permit, or any other City -issued permits. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval of such permits shall constitute a default of this Agreement and is grounds for termination of this Agreement. 6. MEETING ATTENDANCE The Nonprofit shall attend all City pre -event planning meetings and event recap meetings if warranted. 7. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 8. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by August 21, 2017, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 9. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 12. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: To Recipient: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild Attn: Ellen French 27475 Ynez Road #435 Temecula, CA 92591 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 17. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VALLEY OF THE MIST QUILD GUILD (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Ellen French, President By: Cindy McAlister, Secretary NONPROFIT Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild Attn: Ellen French 27475 Ynez Road #435 Temecula, CA 92591 (951) 312-4927 Gail200@icloud.com PM Initials: Date: t� EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS CO-SPONSOR Valley of the Mist Quilt Guild shall provide the following benefits and services for the citizens of the City of Temecula: • City of Temecula logo/name on advertisements • City of Temecula name on all press releases • City of Temecula logo/name on event poster • City of Temecula logo/name on event flyers **Press Releases will be distributed to all local media, however, publication cannot be guaranteed. Press Releases can also be provided to all sponsors for distribution to their clients, agents, employees, etc. EXHIBIT "B" IN-KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show event. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event: Police: $ 0.00 Fire: $ 0.00 Public Works: $ 0.00 Community Services: $ 1,900.00 TOTAL: $ 1,900.00 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The estimated value for in-kind promotional assistance provided by The City of Temecula for the Old Town Temecula Outdoor Quilt Show is as follows: Item Value Auto Mall Marque Appears approximately once every 4'/ minutes Cable Channel Event slide appears approximately once per hour for 30 seconds City Website Event listing on the City of Temecula's event calendar Promotional Poster 42X66 poster located in the concourse at the Civic Center $ 3,115.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 1,000.00 TOTAL VALUE: $ 11,415.00 Item No. 8 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Rene B. Martinez, Sr. dba Rene's Commercial Management for Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services, and Approve an Appropriation from the General Fund Reserve PREPARED BY: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve an Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Rene B. Martinez, Sr. dba Rene's Commercial Management, in the amount of $100,000, for Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services; 2. Approve an appropriation, in the amount of $100,000, from the General Fund Reserve. BACKGROUND: This project will provide turnkey homeless encampment site cleanup within the City limits with the goal to keep waterways, parks, and public space free of encampments to protect the environment and provide safe use of public areas. On May 26, 2017, a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services was posted on the City's online bidding service, PlanetBids. Two proposals were due and received on June 22, 2017. These submittals were reviewed by selected panel members to determine the most qualified and competitively priced firms. After thorough review of both proposals, Rene B. Martinez d/b/a Rene's Commercial Management was selected to provide the City with cleanup services of homeless encampments. City staff is also working with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) on a Funding Agreement that will provide reimbursement for any work that takes place on District property, including portions of Temecula Creek and Murrieta Creek. The Funding Agreement authorizes the City to enter District property for the purpose of removing materials (trash, debris, biological materials, abandoned personal property and other similar materials), and District shall reimburse City for actual costs up to a total of $50,000 during term of agreement proposed to run concurrent with Fiscal Year 2017-18. The Funding Agreement will be scheduled for approval by City Council at a future meeting date. FISCAL IMPACT: The appropriation of $100,000 from the General Fund Reserve will be included in Public Works Department Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Reimbursement of up to $50,000 will be received from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for any work that takes place on District owned property. ATTACHMENT: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND RENE B. MARTINEZ, SR. D/B/A RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of August 22, 2017, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Rene B. Martinez, Sr. d/b/a Rene's Commercial Management, a Sole Proprietor (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 22, 2017, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2018, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the Agreement for two (2) additional one (1) year term(s). In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2020. If Agreement is extended beyond the original term, the Agreement price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each calendar year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside Area published monthly by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (CPI). 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work"), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. 1 c. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Contractor shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 4. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DI R) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 2 8. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks. html 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 3 11. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 4 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City 's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: "I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract." 5 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the Work contemplated by this Agreement, Contractor shall file an affidavit with the City Manager stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 6 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's subcontractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 20. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 21. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 22. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 23. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: 24. ASSIGNMENT Rene B. Martinez, Sr. d/b/a Rene's Commercial Management 1002 Luna Way San Jacinto, CA 92583 The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 25. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Rene B. Martinez, Sr. d/b/a Rene's Commercial Management By: By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Rene B. Martinez, Sr. By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Rene B. Martinez, Sr. d/b/a Rene's Commercial Management 1002 Luna Way 951-830-0239 rcm1002.rm@gmail.com 9 PM Initial�� Date: EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK Contractor recognizes and agrees that this Agreement is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship between the City of Temecula and the Contractor, for turnkey homeless encampment site cleanup within the City limits. Services will be performed on an as needed basis. The procedure for assigning work is set forth as follows: 1. The City Manager or his designee shall submit to Contractor a written "Request for Work". The Request for Work shall include a description of the work to be completed, the time for completion of the work, and the plans and specifications, if any, work. 2. Within five (5) business days of the date of the Request for Work, Contractor shall respond in writing to the Request for Work and advise the City Manager whether it can perform the work and specify the cost of material which will be required and the estimated cost of labor and equipment necessary to complete the work in accordance with the labor and equipment rates set forth in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement. 3. In the event emergency work is required, the City Manager may transmit the Request for Work orally to the Contractor. As soon as practical following the emergency, the Contractor and Director shall in good faith confirm in writing the scope of the emergency work undertaken. 4. Upon acceptance of the Contractor's response by the City Manager, the Contractor shall proceed with the work. The performance of the work shall be pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 5. The Work is described as follows: A. General Specifications: 1. Overview: As directed by the City, provide turnkey homeless encampment site cleanup for a safe and clean site by removing biohazardous material and other encampment waste material. 2. Site Conditions: Sites are considered to contain a variety of materials that may contain hazardous materials, including biohazardous materials, garbage, general debris, human waste, constructed temporary shelter, and other items associated with homeless occupancy. 3. Site Locations: Sites will be identified individually. The City will make an effort, when possible, to cluster several sites. Sites include under structures (e.g., bridges), forested open area, vegetated ground cover, abandoned structures (e.g., houses, sheds, outbuildings), and scrap material and/or tent built shelter. Property may be public or privately owned. The City will be responsible to give access to the site. 10 4. Biohazard Handling: Site supervisor and worker must be trained and certified in handling and disposal of hazardous materials. Provide copies of any applicable training records, certifications, and licenses required to perform this work. 5. Structure Demolition: Some work may require the removal of wood frame or concrete block structures. This may include asbestos analysis, removal and disposal, and permits must be obtained. The City will waive fees for City permits. 6. Occupants: All sites will be cleared by City of Temecula Police Department prior to access to the site. 7. Payment: Work shall be performed under a force account (time and material). Documentation of employee hours, subcontractor costs, equipment and material costs, and disposal costs shall be provided to the City. 8. Prevailing Wages: Prevailing wages are required on this project. Certified Payroll documentation is required to be submitted to the City after each work order performed under this agreement. 9. Business License: A City Business License is required prior to performing work within the City. B. Duties and Responsibilities: 1. Cleanup duties shall include surveying sites, collecting debris, dismantling temporary structures, removal of trash, removal of human waste, and State approved handling and removal of all material. Disposal shall be at a site permitted to accept such materials. 2. Supply all labor, material, tools, protective clothing and gear, and equipment that is required or needed to perform the work to handle, remove, transport, and dispose of the waste materials and leave a clean site. 3. Coordinate with the City on a site -by -site basis to determine the work order for each encampment cleanup. The work order will establish the site start date, estimated timeframe of the work, staging areas, traffic control, if required, and the name of the onsite representative. 4. Supervision and management of crew and subcontractor, and ensure all necessary safety procedures are followed. This individual will serve as the City's contact. 5. Photograph the encampment site before and after cleaning and provide an electronic copy of each photograph to the City. 6. Notify the City when the work is complete and provide a cleanup report for each site, including total weight of debris removed. 7. Notify the City's designated representative in the event an adjacent homeless encampment is discovered in the general area during the course of a project to obtain authorization prior to proceeding with any additional work that was not identified in the work scope. 11 8. Follow best practices work procedures to safely manage any hazardous materials found on the jobsite, including urine, feces, solid personal hygiene items, syringes, and other materials which could pose a health threat. 9. Trim shrubs and vegetation, as required by the City, as a deterrent measure for future encampments. 10. For abandoned building encampments where the City directs demolition of the building, the selected Proponent must perform an asbestos review of the site and provide a report on the findings with an asbestos mitigation plan with a cost estimate for the mitigation of the structure to the City. The City will review and decide on how to proceed. If the selected Proponent is directed to proceed with the abatement and demolition of the building, asbestos mitigation and disconnection of all service utilities must be performed before demolition can proceed. 11. Immediately contact the City of Temecula Police Department through 911 if a weapon is found. 12. Perform work in a timely and efficient manner and in a courteous and business -like manner at all times. 13. Properly handle and dispose of solid waste and hazardous waste in accordance with all applicable laws. C. City Responsibilities: 1. Issue a work order with a minimum of a 72 -hour notification to start time of a cleanup project. 2. Provide security during the posting of the "Notice to Vacate" and provide services, if requested, during cleanup. 3. Provide a City representative to serve as a point of contact for reviewing work orders, authorizing work, addressing issues and questions. 4. Post "Notice to Vacate" signs at the work site seventy-two (72) hours prior to the commencement of each removal project. City will photograph notices to document time and location of posting. D. Detail of Bid Items (Exhibit E — Fee Schedule): 1. Site Cleanup Mobilization: Single mobilization for each site, with only one payment per site regardless of how many days a single cleanup may require, to include all pre -site work setup up times, site travel times, planning, and other tasks to get the site ready to perform cleanup. 2. Site Cleanup Labor and Equipment: Includes prevailing wage labor and equipment necessary to perform all site cleanup operations. 3. Biohazard Technician: Includes prevailing wage labor, containment of biohazardous waste, transient debris or any litter that poses health and safety risk, removal of contaminated contents, personal protective equipment, consumable supplies, administrative fees, and photo documentation. 4. Biohazard Material Disposal: Containment, transportation, and disposal of biohazard material per 40 gallon containment unit. 12 5. Non-biohazard Material Disposal: Containment, transportation, and disposal of non-biohazard material off site based on weight. City of Temecula has exclusive franchise agreement with CR&R Environmental Services for construction and demolition disposal 6. Asbestos Abatement: The scope of work and cost will be based a City approved Asbestos Assessment. 7. Demolition of Structures: The scope of work and cost will be based on a City approved Demolition Plan. EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE CITY OF TEMECULA Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 219 Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services Fee Schedule The City may, at its discretion, select to implement only one or more bid items and a single quantity or more throughout the term of the agreement. Some bid items may never be implemented during the term of the agreement. The estimated quantities shown below are for the purpose of evaluating each bid for determination of the lowest responsive bidder. BID ITEM NO. BID ITEM DESCRIPTION UOM 1 QTY PRICE 1. Site Cleanup Mobilization Per Site $ 55.00 2. Site Cleanup Labor and Equipment Each Hour $ 145.00 3. Biohazard Technician Each Hour $ 40.00 4. Biohazard Material Disposal 40 Gallon Container $ 25.00 5. Non -Biohazard Material Disposal Per Ton $ 45.00 6. Asbestos Abatement Time and Material N/A 7. Demolition of Structures Time and Material N/A NO. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION PRICE PER HOUR PRICE PER DAY 1. Dozer--- D4T Dozer $ 250.00 $ 1,500.00 2.DBs#se 328 Excavator $ 85.00 $ 675.00 3. 430E Backhoe $ 85.00 $ 385.00 4. 450C Loader $ 85.00 $ 650.00 5. 2500 Galion Water Truck $ 50.00 $ 375.00 6 6 Ton Dump Truck $ 50.00 $ 325.00 Dated: 0/1/2 r7 By. Signature of AutIM Rene B. Martinez Sr., Owner/Operator Print Name and Title 38 15 Item No. 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 22, 2017 Receive and File Temporary Street Closure for 2017 Autumnfest Events PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: action by the City Manager: Mayra De La Torre, Principal Civil Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Civil Engineer That the City Council receive and file the following proposed Temporarily close certain streets for the following 2017 Autumnfest Events: WESTERN DAYS HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR GREEK FESTIVAL VETERAN'S DAY PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DAY BACKGROUND: Five special events, scheduled for September through November 2017, necessitate the physical closure of all or portions of certain streets within the Old Town area. The closures are necessary to facilitate the events and protect participants and viewers. The five events and the associated street closures are as follows: 1. WESTERN DAYS — September 23, 2017 The Western Days event will be held Saturday, September 23, 2017, in the Town Square Park with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to Mercedes Street 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 23, 2017 Mercedes Street between Fourth Street and Third Street 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 23, 2017 2. HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR — September 30, 2017 The Health & Community Resource Fair will be held Saturday, September 30, 2017, in the Town Square Park with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to Mercedes Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, September 29, 2017 to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 30, 2017 Mercedes Street between Fourth Street and Third Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, September 29, 2017 to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 30, 2017 3. GREEK FESTIVAL — October 13, 14, 15, and 16, 2017 The Greek Festival event will be held Saturday, October 14, 2017 and Sunday, October 15, 2017, at the Town Square Park with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old 8:00 a.m. on Friday, October 13, to 2017 Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to 7:00 a.m. on Monday, October 16, 2017 Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, October 13, 2017 between Fourth Street and Third Street to 7:00 a.m. on Monday, October 16, 2017 4. VETERAN'S DAY — November 11, 2017 The Veteran's Day event will be held Saturday, November 11, 2017 at the Town Square Park with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to Mercedes Street 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, November 11, 2017 Mercedes Street between Fourth Street and Third Street 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, November 11, 2017 5. PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DAY — November 18, 2017 The Pechanga Pu'eska Mountain Day event will be held Saturday, November 18, 2017, at the Town Square Park with the necessary street closures scheduled as follows: Main Street from the easterly driveway edge of 28636 Old Town Front Street at Rosa's Cantina to Mercedes Street 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, November 18,' 2017 Mercedes Street between Fourth Street and Third Street 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, November 18,' 2017 Street closures for the 2017 Autumnfest events are shown on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. Street closures are allowed by the California Vehicle Code upon approval by the local governing body for certain conditions. Under Vehicle Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways," local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing." Chapter 12.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Parades and Special Events, provides standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way and authorizes the City Council or City Manager to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these events. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of police services, as well as services provided by the City Public Works Maintenance Division, for providing, placing and retrieving of necessary warning and advisory devices are appropriately budgeted within the City's operating budget for City -sponsored events. The Greek Festival is not City -sponsored and, therefore, its sponsors will be completely funding the needed support services for this event ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 'A' — Autumnfest Street Closures - 2017 AUTUNINFEST STREET CLOSURES - 2017 (MAIN STREET AND MERCEDES STREET) * WESTERN DAYS - SEPTEMBER 23 * HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCES FA/R - SEPTEMBER 30 * GREEK FESTIVAL - OCTOBER /3 -16 * VETERAN'S DAY - NOVEMBER /1 * PECHANGA PU'ESKA MOUNTAIN DAY - NOVEMBER /8 EXHIBIT 'A' LEGEND STREET CLOSURE BARRICADE Item No. 10 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Summarily Vacate Restricted Access Along a Portion of Rancho California Road at Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 19580-1 PREPARED BY: Mayra De La Torre, Principal Civil Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO SUMMARILY VACATE RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG A PORTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 19580-1, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE BACKGROUND: On February 3, 2017, the property owner of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 19580-1 filed a Summary Vacation application with the City for the purpose of vacating a portion of existing restricted access rights on Rancho California Road. Pursuant to Parcel Map No. 19580-1 recorded on November 1, 1984, the abutter's access rights to Rancho California Road were restricted from Parcel 3 of Tract Map No. 19580-1. The subject vacation will remove a 24 -foot wide portion of the existing restricted access to allow a driveway access opening at the northerly side of Rancho California Road for a proposed commercial development (Home2 Hotel). The subject vacation will not affect any current access rights to the existing Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 19580-1 abutting Rancho California Road nor will any utilities will be affected by the vacation. Thus, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the proposed summary vacation pursuant to Chapter 4, Part 3, Division 9 of the Streets and Highway Code. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO SUMMARILY VACATE RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG A PORTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 19580-1, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declares as follows: A. The Owner's Statement of Parcel Map 19580-1 provides that the Owner of Parcel 3 will have no rights of access to Rancho California Road. B. In February, 2017 the Owner of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 19580-1 (hereinafter "Owner") filed a Summary Vacation application with the City for the purpose of vacating a portion of existing restricted access rights on Rancho California Road. Pursuant to Parcel Map No. 19580-1 recorded November 1, 1984, the abutter's access rights to Rancho California Road were restricted from Parcel 3. C. The Owner now desires to vacate a 24 -foot wide portion of the restricted access along Rancho California Road as shown on Parcel Map No. 19580-1 to allow for a driveway opening at the northerly side of Rancho California Road for a proposed commercial development. D. The City Council desires to effectuate the intention of the Owner by summarily vacating the existing restricted access along a portion of the northerly side of Rancho California Road from Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 19580-1 and as described on Exhibits "A" and "B," attached hereto. E. This vacation is made pursuant to Section 8330 to 8336 of the Streets and Highways Code. F. This vacation will not change current access rights to Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 19580-1 abutting Rancho California Road. G. There are no public utility easements or facilities, which will be affected by this vacation. Section 2. The restricted access along a portion of the northerly side of Rancho California Road on Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 19580-1, as described on Exhibit "A" and "B," is hereby vacated and shall no longer constitute an easement or right-of-way or other interest in real property on the City of Temecula and shall revert to the Owner. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified copy of the Resolution to be recorded pursuant to Section 8336 of the Streets and Highway Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of August, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Exhibit "A" 6/22/2017 Legal Description Sheet 1 of 1 Summary Vacation of Restricted Access — Rancho California Road THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 19580-1 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 125, PAGES 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 3, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, SOUTH 83°03'53" WEST A DISTANCE OF 26.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH 83°03'53" WEST A DISTANCE OF 24.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRE TJON SEA MY LICENS 6rAd-)7 , L. 9109 DATE PIRES 09/30/2018 SINGLE --- �OA K 0=0642272 R.-567.00' ^� 'FE ----66J8' SCALE: 1"=60' 0 30 60 g ° 's oD f� '✓rfr✓irr✓✓✓✓ EXHIBIT ' B' IEGEND F DRI vE (N Page 1 of 1 POC PO/NT OF COMMENCEMENT POB TRUE PO/NT OF BEGINNING POT PO/NT OF TERMINUS STREET CENTER LINE EASEMENT RIGHT—OF—WAY L/NE PROPERTY BOUNDARY RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS �( ) PER PARCEL MAP NO. 19580-1 PAGES 1-6 INCLUSIVE, BOOK 125 p fl75S©L \ \ \\I EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PER TRACT MAP 19580-1 24.00' 26.00' 240.00' / / ✓r //r//r✓✓//////r✓✓rr r/ d. (5 8303'53" W 290POT-4800) \i - 3,15.3g% NTh 0 co RANCHO RAy POC ✓l✓ R/W CALIFORNIA ROAD ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 4340 VIEWRIDGEAVENUE, SUITE B SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 PH: 858.634.8620 FX: 858.634-8627 R/W Item No. 11 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Summarily Vacate Restricted Access Along a Portion of Rancho California Road at Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 35481 PREPARED BY: Mayra De La Torre, Principal Civil Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO SUMMARILY VACATE RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG A PORTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 35481, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE BACKGROUND: On December 6, 2015, the property owner of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 35481 filed a Summary Vacation application with the City for the purpose of vacating a portion of existing restricted access rights on Rancho California Road. Pursuant to Parcel Map No. 35481 recorded on October 24, 2008, the abutter's access rights to Rancho California Road were restricted from Parcel 1 of Tract Map No. 35481. The subject vacation will remove a 40 -foot wide portion of the existing restricted access to allow a driveway opening at the southerly side of Rancho California Road for a proposed commercial development (Aldi Market). The new access opening will align with the current signalized intersection of Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane. The subject vacation will not affect current access rights to the existing Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 35481 abutting Rancho California Road nor will any utilities will be affected by the vacation. Thus, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the proposed summary vacation pursuant to Chapter 4, Part 3, Division 9 of the Streets and Highway Code. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO SUMMARILY VACATE RESTRICTED ACCESS ALONG A PORTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 35481, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 4, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declares as follows: A. The Owner's Statement of Parcel Map 35481 provides that the Owner of Parcel 1 will have no rights of access to Rancho California Road. B. In December, 2015 the Owner of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 35481 (hereinafter "Owner") filed a Summary Vacation application with the City for the purpose of vacating a portion of existing restricted access rights on Rancho California Road. Pursuant to Parcel Map No. 35481 recorded October 24, 2008, the abutter's access rights to Rancho California Road were restricted from Parcel 1. C. The Owner now desires to vacate a 40 -foot wide portion of the restricted access along Rancho California Road as shown on Parcel Map No. 35481 to allow for a driveway opening at the southerly side of Rancho California Road for a proposed commercial development. The new access opening will align with the current signalized intersection of Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane. D. The City Council desires to effectuate the intention of the Owner by summarily vacating the existing restricted access along a portion of the southerly side of Rancho California Road from Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 35481 and as described on Exhibits "A" and "B," attached hereto. E. This vacation is made pursuant to Section 8330 to 8336 of the Streets and Highways Code. F. This vacation will not change current access rights to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 35481 abutting Rancho California Road. G. There are no public utility easements or facilities, which will be affected by this vacation. Section 2. The restricted access along a portion of the northerly side of Rancho California Road on Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 35481, as described on Exhibit "A" and "B," is hereby vacated and shall no longer constitute an easement or right-of-way or other interest in real property on the City of Temecula and shall revert to the Owner. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified copy of the Resolution to be recorded pursuant to Section 8336 of the Streets and Highway Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of August, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (SUMMARY VACATION OF RESTRICTED ACCESS - RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD) THAT CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL A OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA10-0328, RECORDED AUGUST 3, 2011, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2011- 0338876, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OF SAID COUNTY, OFFICIAL RECORDS, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 35481 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 227, PAGES 23 THROUGH 24, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID CORNER BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (122 FEET WIDE) AND ON A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3933.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°37'04" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 179.69 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID CURVE, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 26°05'44" WEST, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°34'58" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID CURVE, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 25°30'46" WEST, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF TERMINATION. EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. i,j/1 4/%1 , - - . NEIL E. THONESEN DATE P.L.S. 8656 LIC. EXP. 12/31/2017 Rev. 04/06/2017 Page 1 of 1 LEGEND P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT T.P.O.B TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.T. POINT OF TERMINATION "/7/7/ INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS 6j � rc__�1. EXHIBIT 'B' PLAT MAP as D=0034'58" R=3933.00' L=40.00' T.P.O.B. .„,'''."'''FC<: : ( Tx. VA45 64 -11 T. P.O.C. PARCEL 1 P M 13466 PMB / 76-68-69 P.O.T. raj PARCEL A LLA NO. PA10-0328 INST. NO. 2011-033886 REC'D. 08/03/11, O.R. VACATION OF RESTRICTED ACCESS PER CITY OF TEMECULA RESOLUTION NO. 11-29 REC'D. 04/18/11, PER INST. NO. 2011-0171560, O.R. rp VACATED RESTRICTION ACCESS PARCEL B LLA NO. PA10-0328 0 80 160 Feet PREPARED BY: ma CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 16453 E. MANNING AVE. REEDLEY, CA 93654 PH:(559) 637-1544 VACATION OF ACCESS RESTRICTION EXHIBIT DATE: 11/14/2016 1 DRAWN BY: JDK I JOB NO.: 15097 1 PAGE 1 OF 1 Item No. 12 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Approve Tract Map 36479 (Located at the Southeast Corner of Nicolas Road and Via Lobo) PREPARED BY: Mayra De La Torre, Principal Civil Engineer John Pourkazemi, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve Tract Map 36479 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond as security for the Agreement; 3. Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monumentation Bond as security for the Agreement. BACKGROUND: Record Title Interest: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. Tract Map 36479 proposes to subdivide a 73.30 gross acre (71.25 net acre) property into 83 single family residential lots. The property covered by this Tract Map is located at the southeast corner Nicolas Road and Via Lobo. Tentative Tract Map 36479 (PA 12-0133) was approved by City Council on August 26, 2014. The public improvements associated with the development of this Tract Map are required to be constructed. The survey monuments are also required to be set. Thus, the property owner/developer is obligated to execute the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and the Subdivision Monument Agreement, and post the required securities. The property owner/developer has met the terms of the Conditions of Approval for map recordation, and this Tract Map is in conformance with the approved Tentative Tract Map. The approval of a Subdivision Map, which substantially complies with the approved Tentative Tract Map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fees and Securities Report 2. Vicinity Map 3. Tract Map 36479 (reduced copy) CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP 36479 DATE: August 22, 2017 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY LABOR & MATERIALS SECURITY Street and Drainage Improvements $335,000 $167,500 Erosion and Sediment Control Provisions $27,500 $13,750 TOTAL $362,500 $181,250 MONUMENTATION SECURITY MONUMENTATION $45,000 - DEVELOPMENT FEES: RCFC&WCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES: Paid To be paid Planning Fee $714.00 Fire Fee $262.00 CSD Fee $1,240.00 Map Check Fee $28,415.00 Monumentation inspection Fee $1,100.00 Fees paid to date $31,731.00 Balance of fees due $0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY/CITY LIMITS TRACT 36479 VICINITY MAP N.T.S. GROSS AREA: 73 300 ACRES NET AREA: 71.245 ACRES NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 63 NUMBER LETTER LOTS: 9 NUMBER OPEN SPACE LOTS: 9 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 SHEET 1 OF 14 SHEETS RECORDER'S STATEMENT FIELD THIS DAY 0" 2017, BEING A 51480.'M'S10') OF PARCELS I, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER MATH LOTS A, B C, 0, E, F, 0 AND L O' PARCEL MAP 9783, FRED 10, GOOK 54 PACE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, 111 THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE 00)14TY AT _M IN HOOK OF MAPS, RECORDER CALIFORNIA 'UNSAK)9 AND ASSOCIATES 1:30 FEBRUARY 2016 Al 'ACHE' AT THE REQUEST OF LIEF CI FY CIFRK, CITY OE TEMECULA OWNER'S 3TA1EN1INT WE HE:R:SY STATE THA' WE ARE IH'. 0131<0R5 OF INE LAN) 'JA43DED 81TFIN THE 53012105139 SHOWN '0RE0:,1 TIIAT NE AR) 1<F 0118 P`_RS:NS 141055 CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO (!0105 A CEA,, TITLE IC SATO LAND', THAT WE C095ENF TO MAKING AILD /4)0301'0.. 0' 114 SURDHASION 114E AS1$A114, 801910 TTIE CISTt4g114 (0CRCER DEP WL HEREBY DEDICATE AN 110441101' TO PUHA IC USE FCR 11087E AND 9.13C JOLTY 1LR?0905 9444 LOT "A" IMCCIAS 1300) AND 101 "8" ()19 LO0D) 9, 13s0 HEREBY'`.CTCA' 10 PUBLIC USE, EASEMEN10 ELN1 '893IC 0YU1Y 1-05)0515, ,30484iT1 WA THE 810+1 01 150,1ESS 01.1) I.GRI55 FCR SERVICE AND EL"RGEN:CY 01110 E5 AND ACCESS '0TRE.8 RVE1'59'5 0' IFR1)3(15 1 I'NCLUSI'VE, 5)010I 'S 1EPRIV41: 5071 FY"1 AIR) 20.-11095 f''GIS 32 AND 83 41T,"I 1115 MAP TE ALSO 1'4<1.10 D=R,CATF TO PUBLIC HSI AN ' A19)619T CR A C: ASS I WATT USE TRAIL ANC '.:DLL ACCESS PURPOSES AS SHOO11 MINN ORS YAP 11.1: ALSO I,0413<1 0.-31,041.7 TO RIF. 0011E TIL 5 'OJT 'ALOE "391 IC :1).117 EASEMENTS AS 00011N '0700 10.5 TRACT MAP WE ALSO HEREBY RED CATE 10 THE 13 1 0' TE1EC'.1' A 71 2) POO" WOE EASEMENT FCR ORA:NAGE AND PIPELINE PURPOSES AS SHOVE 1.411111 THIS TRACT MAP AS A CD1:01101, 1110.104,1100] OF LOT HEICATO AS ROAD) AND .T 10 1410 00001 TI1 ;AERS 01 LG 00. 29, 90, 92 AN; 93, 110114NC h{x 190M4.4I5 AND 01<11)00 5.44 SW. TILL HAAS NO 4)415 CIE 0044 FICFP :F GENERAL 105)9<51 giFAL IR,00 LSCEP AG ONE 13 FOOT LC' 11144 §r4 01 , 1.45 ROAD '?IC 46 5 11001 0i0541<i (! NA LOBO AND 01.E 51 0001 OFE115.11 °EI VIA 110 AS SHOV.11 ENPE'Y AAV .µ44k 7r A:10.3001 11C:H 1.485 0053,15 .13 'HE VACA104 TH_0_P- SMALL [0060TE T.5 310004101) A, 10 11 tE PAP ,401,100 AE A_53 RETAN LOTS C' THR1UC) 01 04;49 04/7'1'\ AS ('18<0)T: STRFFIS"), ECR PRIVATE USE FCR 'HE S0_1 RENEW OF C'.,RSELVES, OAR SUCCESSORS, ,1500.00< 0113101 OW71FI11 '48911.0 TITS FRATTI MAIL AI ALSO HEREBY RC -44N LOTS 84 '110,^,UCH 90, 110111, 1<101CA1(0 AS OPEN SRACE. AS FHA ARI 001805N, FOR 'Rb.41E USE FCR THE SOLS fAENF111" OF OURSELVES, CUR 9„iC[{j5CRS, ASSCNEiS AND 1).0: DINNERS 'PAI?NN THIS TRACT IAA.P ALSO HEREBY RKEA, N LOTS 91 AND 92, 190.CATED AS DF'F\1011 005110, AS SH0'NJ ([11001, FOR PRIVATE USE, FOR THE <0) BENFF-1 OF CLIRSE.Y-S, (XII? SUCCESSORS ASS'GNEES, AND LOT OWNERS 1VU0]'', HIS TRACT MAP 'AE ALSO HEREBY R0 -ARI LOT 93, INDICATED AS OPEN SPACE/) UB 1 PARK AS EA -CNN IIFPE011 FOR <1)F.'.0 USE 411E ALSO I'ER0BY RC AN THE EASEMENS ND EA IED AS ''I<NA10 D:90.9TGE EASEMENT' A5 SHOWN FIERE00, FOR 111114111 NSE, FCR TILE SC:= BEETLED o" OJ'+SL YES, 033. SUCCESSORS, A9SCHEFS, .INC 101 OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MA' WE ALSO'.E0EBY RE1211. 1,E EASEMENTS 1:JIC0TEC AS "'RI001) SOT" EASEMENT' AS SHOAT HEREON, FOR 09501E U SE, FOR THF SOLE 3'093.11 OF 017113' YES, CIM SUCCESSORS ASSIGNEES AND IDE 014<0RS 01IHN THIS TRACT MA' RE ALSO HEREBY R1TA14 A 25 F007 W'DE EASEMENT 01UCATED AS A "PRIVATE UBU19 EASEMENT. OVER A PORTION LOTS 0Z AND 83 AS SOW HEREON, FOR PRIVATE USE, FOR 011E SOLE MERE OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES, AND LOT ON4EA5 NMI 10115 TRACT MAP. 0381E051 LERNER FURIES OF CALFORNM, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION GEOFF SMITH - AUTHORIZED ABENT AUTNOAFLED 51E04890A') 516NAT0'E OM1551oMS 1 0050ATP '0 SECT CN 66,16 1)Y` THE SLBOClS-O`. MAP ACT, THE 5'000' (0110 OF THE FOLLOW]; O7,NERS CT EASEMENTS ANDACR OTTER ''1±10STS PAVE HEN OMITTED AN EASEMENT ELT PIP".IRIS A17 CCI)ENTAL 1500.0SS ll "54001 CF SCJ7,01111 0,4<13R.NIA CAS 00M?ANY. SLCCESSCR IN 1111111 (110 SCUT ERN C00011ES ;AS ;001'A'1Y RECORDED U.' 7 '919 AS INSTRUMENT '10 '949 112 01 CHICLY. HOCKS A PERMANENT '<EEME141 FOR PI''.1NES AND 1,01<0NTAL <0050)0< ". AVER 0; 0ERlC CL 'AN 001011 RSTRET RECORDED +''')5)0 27 1949 AS INSTRU059' 110 1949 3113 CF CFF',3'_ I'ECCRDE 0 PERMANENT _''SFA''^.N1 FOR RICHT 0' 1X01 N 'AMOR OE METRCPO LAC WATER JSTRICT_ RECORDED DECJABH) 1, 1953 AS DOER 1531, EAG. 11 OE OFFICIO, RECORDS .+A 1305) MEAT 13) 1)31.1 0'" WAY AND 13P011910L 101POS-ES 13. 1040:0 01) 5(.)3"''5'. ;.00)16NIA GAS CCNIP0311, SUCCESSOR 19 INTE005T TO SOUTHERN 1036)11] CAS 0,11<ANY, RECORDED SEPTE9501 19, 1055 A5 60C1 7330., PAG' 559 01 2)62 4, RLCCRD', AN EASEMENT TCR I:111110<. AND 11C 41)10, PURPOSE:.) N 144134 CI SOUTHERN 2A:,FO:0NIA FDISCN COMPANY, RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1969 AS 4(51104804' NO '8053 01 CFI 0I01 RECORCS AN FASEMT_110 FOR ROADWAY ACCESS AND ULL TY P R•CS S AND INCUR'STHEPE10, TO0ETHE17 NIT SI OLE EASEMENT AC.01, 110 SAO ROADWAYS AT A P1O0 CF 2 1 AS f 1 ) BY GONTRNMENTAI AGENCIES, ICG: TETER ,AR. 11) RIGHT TO DEDICATE THE SAME A5 RESET/ED _Y RANCHO CA11001,10 A PARTNER9H'P 11 TEE LEEDS RECORDED MAY 29, 1969 AS 4)110.VEIJT NOS 5320' 9) FAVOR CF 100E50 L AND LEIIA ALBANO, 53289 IN FAV013 OF PAA,, 5'1010<1, AND 53295 'N `1)01' 0' )11:IVERS'I" 1 000093, 90 0' CFFCIAI !ZEC010S 0' 90,1005IDE COUNTY, 00''CRNIA AN EASEMENT F[R 01111TES NC GENT AL 1 LR O5)0 1'1 FAVC4 Y GENERAL MEP 10NE CCP.'P141Y, RECORDED FEBRUARY 26 1970 AS INSTR uMENT NO 10-19026 AN EASEMENT FOR UT LEIS AND INCIDENTAL PURE:OHS IN FAVOR (2 '3, 111'RN CAIGRNIA EOI5,4: A COMF•ANY, RECORDED ;JET 05, 19'0 AS NSTRUMFI:T NO 67071 1N EASEMENT EGER ETEBL.0 UTLTEE AND IN ID NTLI PURPOSES N FAACR OF SCII'HFRN CALIF0914.5 EDISO- "CMPAN , oE00''OED AW'USI 07 1972 15 I401001EN: NO 10492' 01 (XI ;LAI, 1)00050< All EASS=40411 10' 43'0540 (UR.) 1]')'ONTAL <.URPOSLS N AVER CI 0' J'-.LRN CAL [1551.1 CAI ±900IY. R'ECORDE'D MARCH 6, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NC 25952 V EASEMENT FOR REHIRE AND SEWER 0)0430 =5 'N .FVOR C 1ASIE114, /11.11) 1'51 814'.4 OSTRICH, RECORDED ALT 22 0015 >5 INSTRUMENT 11:0 201<-0308'15 .1'N EASEMENT FOR 'FELNE AND SEWER PURPOSES IN 1A'VOR O EASTERN VL5ICPAL MATED "STRICT, '7,01901) <'000 72 2016 AS '95 839EN: 1,0 2015-0308116, AN 000E1'F',4 FOR UTILITY 01PE1 N_ 0113 19ODENTA1 1,1,1)0115., (0300 C' 62'(0170 CAL EORNA )MATER 0 STRCT RF CURDLE) JANIZARY 9, 2017 AS 95HI7,1<1<1T No 70'/-00178453 AM 6ASENd1 PM/ .PW N AND 5EP,EN PURPOSES IN FAWN OP arum loom 148189 oswiCT RIEu1(NTD .71934847 SF, 4926 As 4N.S81/gRT N0. 14010, A POFh0N ouNa ii4 @Elf I$! JBIT 110. 2017-0151535, RECORDED 044 84444 11 1017. AN (090611 PON ACCESS PUAPO5185 81 FAVOR OF EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER 01514101, REC(44100 .1.1E 13, 1047 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 1.0i7 -0/76A14, 311 PETER A-OAN.A, 05S1S509-CCII.N') C,IER4- RECORDER 00 DE•'<T0 SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT 5'JBC!V'005 0'134591EE 1,1011 AMER CAN TILE COMPANY TIIIS !'0? WAS PREPARED 54 ME 00 UNDER 1!Y 0060'1(14 A';0 IS BASED UPON A FEED SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE '10H THE REOU REMENTS OE THE 5130010 SLIM MAP AC' AND LOCAL ORDNANCE AT THE 00001<S1 OF REGENT NICOLA5 '3, LLC, 'N 03020T 2000 AND NOVEMBER, 2015 1 HEREBY SATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE Of -4F CHARACTER AND 000111131 THE P051110315 ABDICATE) OR THAT THEY WILL FEE SET IN ACCORDANCE 0161 THE TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT 'OR THE .MAP 0,11D 1HAT THE MONUMENTS ARE, OR RILL 0£, SUFHCIENT TO ENABLE TITS SLRVE" TO BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MSP S0901544001 L' CONFORMS '0 THE CO.NDITIONALL'A 041990VED TENTATIVE MAP TEES 51)8000 IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN 74.93 � Aix F 50.E9309 .0 L- 40183 $i2Y EHOINCgES 5€AtEMEHi 1 0E9E04 CERTEY THA- I HAVE 06448".EO THIS MAP CONSISTING 0• (14) 0, 0 <0E44 SHEETS AND HAVE FOUND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE IA40 OF TRACI MTP NO 35279 AS FILED, AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY CF TEMECULA ON AUGUST 12, 0CI4, DIE EXPIRATION DATE BF:NG AUGUST 12 2017, THAT AL. PROVISIONS GF ACRE CABLE STATE LAW AND or, REGUL'710110 NAVE PEEN COMPLIED 11TH AND : 411 50TISF.ED THAT THE MAP IS TECHNICALLY [3005.7 DALED '1115 001" OT KRIS9 Yr)NCHA'K, L1 62`45 (AS DELEGATED) CITY 0' TEMECULA 2017 FCR PATRICK A IHCMAS CID ENGIN5011 CITY CLERK'S STATEMEAQ 4'04 -11 CODE:CR 47.9 710 043+ J1 1(4'C0U.14, SIA11.91 C"04.IF010RA RY '1. 0181.119449 Y , , 4111'90 68900141 341 10<11 ANAP A71i ACCE7+1'S- IE„ {)INET G' 4393800810') OF .AN 0•$5111,1 00E40 0151 -1i 118331 PLV R1Ty7) '1101: LAT '1' (010 I +73'1) VASE 11F4r[q FOR 1483.:0 ROAD AA5 PJ3_;. 34lU17 436011''5,81 R.S 170101318173 %U;3 Ct TO l4P4D4o)LS4.015 C'JN34L:C100 IN ACCCRDAIGE 'NTH CITY STANDARDS XL ALSO 04441M. ACCEPT THE-A5117FNTS FOR MECO UTILITY P'R'OSES. 909311011 W'. TN OTE R;'HT CE I'<0E.9i AND EC1)6S FOR 59301418,E AND EMERGENCY .E1I1C-CS AND ACCESS PURPOSES OVER LOTS 'C 71100201-1 'I', I,VC_!.SIVE, AS S'^01111 AS CORRIV0'L SREI I"), AND 00-1101,5 0' ID'S 82 AND 93 1.0±1'4 T+-5 MAP AS DEDICATED '.:i ALSO PERO?, ACCEPT TILE DEFER C- 13114.351514 l THE CLASS 12,E T -LSE TRAM_ EASEMEI,1, FOR PI ONO ACCESS 1:41, 5 110 MAP 05 DEDICATED WE ALSO H3REB1 ACCEPT TI IE 5 FOO. WOE '"1161 C PT TTY EASEMENTS 0)113,031. AE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE 00 `001 WIDE CASEMENT "C1) DRAINAGE AND ',PEEPER [.080OSE5 AS DEDICATED WE ALSO HEREB` ACCEPT 111E OFFER CF DELICA'ON C- 100'[05 RICH'S CF 400055 A,ON1' `400.05 RO.1D AND 4") LOBO AS 0E0 GATED WE ALSO HERE80 ACCEPT THE ABANDONMENT CF `.'IA _COO, 80061108 CIRCLE AND 0111:1 09EMENTS FOR ROADS AND FLOCK 01L'TY PURPOSES AND 1 1- ORAI`IAGE AND P EFT :NE PURPOSES AS 0)IO'AT: ON 711E ABANDONMENT NOTE HEREON: 04 RANDI ,.GAIL CO( CLERK, CTY O' 1,6300ULA 0A LE 2017 TAM COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 HERON 1ERT11Y MAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS CE 0115 DATE, ''HERE A0C NO LIENS .4001)1 'HE PROPER EY SH0149 09 THE WITHIN MAP -001 UNPAID SH010, COUNTY 11'116xd8AL, 09 13710110 10110..818 7ARGAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES 001 k"•E.4..91 ASSES• 01191„C7104 A$ TAKES 0,0)4 18 LIEN., BUT NOT YE- PAYABLE, WHICH ARE 0588441410 TO LL „y:-• DATE ' 1. 5017 001, RENT, 1:03117 100 C[LLECTCR 812. 1 ' DEPJTY 7,A)F BOND CERTIFICATE ')I'If♦.rF 119312 -EDV CERTIFY THAT A 1391Yy IN THE SUMSUM - 3 RAS BEEN (:!(,15,11937 AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPEM3951j05 0' 100 COUNTY 5, 51,0)54 .. <0 0RN10, 410'10'1E0 0709 1.1E 0501,'ENT CF ALL TAXES, 5101E, COUNTY, 11..0107<0L, 01 00090, AND ALL SPEC'41 ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, '110:1 AT THE EWE 01 THE HONG 35 THIS 'AA 0171 1TE COUNTY RECORDER ARE 4 001: AGA N5) SA) PROPERTr 001 110" :'E' POTABLE 440 SA'D RCN) HAS OHNE OILY 00-801£2 BY 501.2 00500 01 SUPFR':'5015 nr PATE '1J 2017 CAST CR`SORET.Y BOND 009 KENT 0011.'0 TAX C[1.ECTCR • 1� { 50 y r OEPJ'YFt ABANDONMENT- 11112E PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 662-3' AND 66.99.202 OF 114, SUBDIVISION 'NP ACT, THE APPROVAL AND RECORDATION 05 ThIS ',RAO 7AP CONSTITUTES AHA90:09MEN;' 0" THC"2 0161130 ALL OF VIA LOBO ROAD AS SHO'W'N AS .015 '8" ' AND 'D" AND ALL 0, 40.00'00 CIRCLE SHOWN, AS LOTS "T. "E", 'F", AND 'Pi", A5 OF'01400 FOR 2,00011011 ON PARCEL MAP NO 9783, FILED TN ,MAP ROOK 54. PAGE 43 OE PACO. MAPS IN HE OFFICE 00 AHE [02111Y RECORDER 0' RIVERSIDE COUNTY, WAIN') THE 17CUTA9-RY 05 10110 FRAU VAP AND NOT ST10019 2) ALL OF THE ROAD AND PUB, IC 1.0111" EASE00141 PER DEDICATION RECORDED AUGUST 15, '980 55 INSTRUMENT NO 196075 4'117111:) THE BOUNDARY OF THIS TRACT. )AAP AND NOT SHOWN 31 ALL 0, THE DRAINAGE AND PIPELINE PURPOSES EASEMENT PER 000)ATIO4 RECORD) APRIL 16, 2103 AS 1,NSTRII1ENT NO 2003-267878 W THIN 1"-.0 BOUNDARY 0' "H'S TRACT IAA. 0NO NOT OWN 4) ALL OF 001 DRAINAGE ('.0 PIPELINE PURPOSES 0)0)00NT PER 00500'0', RECORDED 007'7:14 '4. 2011 AS 951RUM'NT NO 2011-0454'.00 WITHIN THE BOUNDARY 0'' THIS TRACT UAP AND Ivo- SHOWN IECAKEWINLESITARY AtSy4lEE,pCEMFNTS AHG1�E FEES FRACTIONAL SECS. 19, 29 AND 3p, 135..RIW.. S.B,M. 114 THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CAUFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1. 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A. B. C, 0, E, F, G 4147 H OF PARCEL MAP 9703. FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVER50E COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FEBRUARY 2016 PAUL R HUODLESTON JR, P.L.S 7083 NOTES: SEE SHEET 3 r05 48J16A1r 940E1 SEE SHEET 4 50 5001 46051MP AND EASEMENT NOTES. SEE SHEET 5 INNA.404 14, 14W9'[. FOR LOTS AND EASELENTS limey ACKNOWLEOR7,IENT$ A NOTARY PUBLIC ER 011(R OFFICER 001#I,L10R45 rnIs 0514101041E 1¢011105 514,Y 1Ni 00 11I1Y OF 1NE INDIVIDUAL 11T10 91154100 1440 OOCUM5,1 TO 1411CH THIS 00914115416 5 AT11104E8, AND NOT THE 10110150,,E15. ACCee18011. CO VAUDITY OF 10(41 045111E141 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Ss COUNTY OF'Rkrark} ���'���Bp.E�FF�ORE1,10..'5U .7411,6,4 A04'10E0? PERSONAL04'10E0'-^"r 1 51+1 Al 911.10 160960 TO WE 011 111E 014910 581151`401500 8910410 TO 9E 4011E 1101504 1.5) 50105E NAI41{}j isrnIE suesateta ID IME 7111N:N el91AU000F 41111 1,068400408540 10 ME THAT HE/04E/1RE4 64EC18150 THE SAW. 11 l65/}i0R/1F�10 417TI101IQE0 CAPA01T064). 141W THAT BY 145fWR/114111I S0/1411.4E1 544 114E 4CIR040,15 111E 11005011(9}. CR 111E 0911811 1)11011 BEHALF OF WHICH THE P51S01(5) 4CIE0. [9665100 1.41 5i5114UME.Yr, I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAMS OF 141E STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. YATNE5S MY HANG AND OFFICIAL SEAL 5�17iA9F 1j4DTM^ ARC 'y y,r�y ` O1 818110FAIL PLATY 01 B4 1V ItCOUNTY MY [W1Y51}P% 41111EER MT 00,We8'11 045659 NOTICE OF 0R0.f►1A5e FETE$ 4510 5 64084e7 01.41 11111 1117. ('16158810 4 6508168 (0 ThE 485014014 061.16/ 94116 05815101114440 AREA 0,14•4115 1,314 111154 014,3 55551m Or 164 801884 3r 11.16811610 01 11144 (Dom a 140441111E 5(1584.441 10 500030 1421, OF 010840 443 Sal 74044, 61461, 61 130, 44. 140 00868H481 WCL AND Nur 3456 6141'1008 IS 5351561 M 1510 64091 5694 9441430 01E4 1101(0(5 613111421 aRN D51. 5461514111 TO 504011044 10755 FJ 418194440E 060, 451111118 68 1140 5651114 r55 91465 OF 049 451, Ch551r9 5451 455 11541' 0411Q 10 414 M540186 0114101 5060 Coma An 114105 08414141158 1610.1 41 04 118E W 0414840540 0r 1140 61,0406 01 1011144 MOW FOR 5.40 1945. 450t0,10 0:04.05 4081, 0813 14951 1140 661,00 OF 114144 481, M 1.140 1180 OF 4054,15 416 (114,081 1145 0818046 011 4444546 000141, 06448 680114 Fri 14E41)1071 14 14 0415 11 111501 Ar 1110 440 Ce (s,1" 4806 00 THE ACTUAL PERMIT SHEET 2 OF 14 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A 50001015104 OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 ANO 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G ANO H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS. IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA SURVEYOR'S NOTES: • 118MCATE5 FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTES O INDICATES SET 1` IP AND TAC 'L 5 7063", FLUSH () INDICATES RECORD DATA A5 NOTED SEN SEARCHED AND FOUND NOTHING HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC, SET 1" IP AND TAG "L 5 7083', FLUSH AT ALL REAR LOT CORNERS. ANGLE POINTS, B C AND E C '5, UNLESS OTHERYASE NOTED SET LEAD ANO TAG "L S 7083", IN TOP OF CURB FOR B C'5. E 45, P C C'S, P R C AND CORNER CUTBACKS PROJECTED PERPENDICULAR OR RADIAL FROM CENTERLINE SET LEAD AND TAG 'L5 7063' IN TOP OF CURB AT ALL FRONT LOT CORNERS ON ALL PROJECTED SIDE LOT LINES DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS \\\\\\\\\\ INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN PER RIO CO ORD 461.21 AND 110 MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THIS MAP THIS TRACT CONTAINS: 7330 ACRES. GROSS THIS TRACT CONTAINS 03 RE90EN11AL 1015 HiQ 10 O7ll wpm 10N5 CC IR FOR THIS MAP RECORDED AS INST. N0. 0R BASIS OF BEARINGS: BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY 5 THE CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 6, NAD 13(1095 50), ADJUSTMENT AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY THE LINE SEWER NOS CONTROL STATIONS 'ROSA' AND 'DASH" SHOWN HEREON AS NORTH 33'51'30' EAST. DATUM STATEMENT: COORDINATES SHOYM HEREON ARE GRID COORDINATES DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GR0UN0 DISTANCES GRID DISTANCES PER THE CAUFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 6, MAD B3 MAY BE OBTAINED BY M1ILTPLRNG THE GROUND DISTANCES BY AN AVERAGE 1144171 a 619090557 RECORD REFERENCES: 121 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 NDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT MAP 3183, M B 63 / 1-35 NDICATES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL MAP 9783, PM 54 / 45 NDICATES RECORD DATA PER RECORD OF SURVEY, RSB 55 / 61-64 NDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT MAP 20048, M B 172 / 67-72 401001ES RECORD DATA PER TRACT MAP 21821, M B 233 / 56-61 NDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT MAP 21430-1, Al B 192 / 1-9 M0056 1 1/2' RRASS CAP STAMPED 'RCE 26457; RUSH, ACCEPTED AS C/L INT. NICOLAS ROAD AND NA LOBO PER R4 4 i *10fg! r1 RRASyS DISK, RUSH, IN DDEPT et STAMPED CALIF ROSA 161' 651' 19 4 011 5555541995 50) 0.6 2 0 51 3 393 {CO6 9 0=62)5 10906 1101 60.11.0'314 50 31.1'91741597 41 'OM 1 115 7,1LV. 146 FLUSH, FA,I;'q[[oiit` 1171 44 DtER ROr TRACT MAP 20848 MB 172/67-72 PAUL R HUDDLESTON JR,, P,L 5. 7083 BOUNDARY SHEET 1,,,.r Y 1=26°2054" Y ' ',' R.:ao7v '� 4.9.14 fiL Ai, 4' b. /o' $1 14 20 N Ill ci 4 'oµ '+Q 9,1 L'i11 --Y`04"�6 I„t X57. DETAIL "A" N,T.5 FO. re DISK, RU9R, IN DWICONIIE STAMPED CAl1F 0654 9047 7514 1491 901054 4 f0 m 1.010518136 (0449 1.0301141 4(4301 0214'49 1k"7961 k" SF=O 9999fi]9fi1 —1*0I 1 I/2' BRASS CAP STAMPED "RCE !6X?. 051. 055', ACCEPTED AS C/L INT, I/f9U9 ROAD WITH NORTHEASTERLY UNE 122b41 TEMECULA PER R6, FOUND 1' I P , UP 0 5' M CONC. TAG 'RCE 26457, ACCEPTED AS C C 5EC 19 01 30 PER R2 PARCEL MAP 10037 PM 57/4-5 FEBRUARY 2016 0 150 348 444 SHEET 3 OF 14 SHEETS 14 900 J 30-14.1, 11 DETAIL "B" N,T.S, 155 30 SCALE 1' = 300' IMENEEMZEMCZEM 01574 111. FA RA0815 11004 o9'o'or Motif 5550r 01 1-1411- 1'51 4'f 5061 145 1 1"00'15 ,1551. li 414 151 25 L2011443 157 S] 456447' d'i6'W 1906m 7!1.74' ET*2131' 949907 71P74'157! 06 401619' SOA SIMM✓J°, 91141 tL7 1''I T! : Wim, 74 11 M1 .: _ 1E5M 911,5 15 `1 _,•i 11- EIMZEMN ®rim. B MIXIEreirM 61 L9 p' 5'111 MUM] W. 5311 FF 9MO1111 751 - E i• 11131",9 A3. f13'3MF SE xiic 1'6 .5" Ila1. _ fl1 311 16'4105 145691' L2I 41]13flY 410' 4 13'11'0*4 43 L22 =MOM 511 H Y11'12'E A]. 1Fls til 347 0 mi 346 1 ME '12:EME1401' ®MIZBIEt$M 1076r IP 22666" 559 OS' L321• 5�1.0 .R3 54 EMIDEEM 13!16 3 int.ham WA'A SEC. 19 'SEC; -3D 44. 2' I P, ON 1 0', TAG 'L5 3483'. PER R3 VICINITY MAP 01051 *'IP, R05H, TAG N T 5. "LS 2501, PER 40 011705 AY 114418 LAMM' 95601112114 61077 1' I P„ RUSH, TAC '4t 2501", PER R2 SFN, ESTAB 5811'510170 RECORD LURVE 5514 F1611 6 =MI MI 1705111 F0090 2 K2 HUB 16 ] 1A, AAP 531 13 3401- 8(646 516505E55510155 LINE RANCHO TEMECULA TRACT MAP 18518 MB 177/14-21 00640 1' 1P„ FTU54. 446, "RCE 2645]' PER 80 lava rLP, RI4MM11 1.1 ?150' KU"' OAK 91801 1414 9619 4748 01574 111. FA RA0815 11004 o9'o'or Motif 5550r 01 1-1411- 111000' /3111r VI 11'1551' 1}41374231.97 414 67 IOW 157 S] 456447' d'i6'W 1906m 7!1.74' ET*2131' 949907 71P74'157! 06 401619' 151096 91141 249 FOUND 2'42" HUB, RUSH, N0 TAG, ACCEPTED AS COMMON CORNER BETWEEN LOTS 249 ANO 250, PER RI RESET 441H I' 0011 OPE WITH TAG LS 1043, FLUSH 272 FOUND 1' 11, 11,i1/SH, TAG LS 2602' PER RI n 273 SRR, ESTAB BY HOLDING RECORD DISTANCE FROM 2,2 HUB PER 11 TRACT MAP 3883 MB 63/0-35 NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOISLEBGEMENTS SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET RICER MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEET 5 1HROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, FOR LOTS AND EASEMENTS SFN, 1' I P TO 9E SET ESTABUSHED 91 412161011104 EST. BY Hp4H0 *am wit PER R2 59790 1' 114. FL05H, TAG, '41''2602 PER RI FOUND I' IP, RUSH, 154 15 2602'. ON 13', PER R1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE: ENNRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET AFFECTING THIS MAP 5 ON HLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE 000 OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, IN E C 5 BOOK PAGE 306 THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS Mec4aM5 , ."./4/4477/6,5t, FDUND 1' 1 P„ 8050, 145„ 'L5 2602 PER 81, o1R 2 �v FOUND 1' 1y, 06994. 1AC 'RCE 72471' 104 R1 FOUND 1' I P, ON 1 5', TAC, 'LS 3790', N0 REFERENCE w IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS I, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, 8, C, D, E, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER ANO ASSOCIATES, INC, FEBRUARY 2015 PAUL R HUDDLESTON JR , P L 5 7083 NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTES SEE SHEET 5 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, FOR LOTS AND EASEMENTS SHEET INDEX OINDICATES SHEET NUMBER - — - INDICATES SHEET BOUNDARY EASEMENT NOTES ( AN £ASE4[NT FOR PIPELINES AND 186104 NIL PURPOSES, 95606016 JULY 7, 1949 AS 1 19588 114 N0, 1949-612 OF OFFICIAL 45711[05 IN FAVOR EIF 9841HERN CALIFORNIA CAS COMPANY SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO SOUTHERN COUNTIES OAS COMPANY 4 P(Ak4NENT %.,741176 1064 AIPELINES ANO INCIDENTAL 41A10SE5, 80117RDE0 O2 01188£$ 27, 1445 AS INS11441[NT 110 1045-3113 OF 0550104 REC085 IN FAVOR OF 4616044L119N 8441414 8581111 A FERNANENT EASEMENT FOR 81040 OF 168. F6CUHY0 406N9E6 4. 4453 AS BOOK 1.2..41531, PAGE 11 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN (AMO OF 4C1RD R11Atl !A1%5 DISTRICT. AN EA5EY4N1 FOR EMI 8T RAP MON ■KI1[14N R PUPAp4$ IEC'ROY4 0ALI19IR 19, O 119 AS 960¢ 73.18, PAM 551 aback R110os Al woo or 70226144 6430:6448 645 1009565 36185562 41 *'41144051 18 SW11888 7y[91IF5 CAS COMPANY. AN EASEMENT FOR 01101145 AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 0 1969 AS INSTRUMENT NO 14663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI50N COMPANY AN [45118,11 041 A4WA'AT ACC055 ANN unto 41.60345 AND MOMS THERETO, (DI 1884.146 61114 R-0PE Fd$41ENT .9446610 546 IIONBWA819 AT A 0.191 MIME 01 A5 1a01AP16 67.14'0171164]i7µ .GEM[µ$ neap 1324 MN Mi RIGHT ID yy41911 THE 50141 AS RESERVED BY RANCHO CALIFORNIA, A PARTNERSHIP IN THE DEEDS RECORDED MAY 29, 1969 A5 INSTRUMENT NOS 53287, 53289 AND 53295 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF 1441414510E COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND MESNE DEEDS OF RECORDS SAID EASEMENT RIGHTS AFFECTS THE NORTHERLY 55 FEET AND THE IESTERLY 44 FEET OE THE NORTHERLY 123196 FEET OF SAID LAND (AFFECTS PARCELS I, 2 AND 3) SHEET INDEX MAP SHEET 4 OF 14 SHEETS 51 100 200 41,0 606 SCALE: 1" = 200' leo 4% 1 / / LOT 93 PUBLIC PARK 6 0 / 441 56' 8111 0647 41114855 AND 1400ENTAL 44041OSE1 EOM= FEBRUARY 26, S 1 79 ! r O 3£I7PAI 10 9 110 70-18026 OF OFFIpy 44(041OS IN OMEN OF GENERAL , I / //,/,, , AN 7.'41151 FOR OTILIBE5 AND 16590N{µ PDRP05E5, 4410441 \( 44104410 JULY 15. 1970 A5 7 O IN51611WHF 80 67621 OF OFFICIAL 14790467 IN PAW OF $1[(1T11(RN CALIFORNIA 1, 1 %r /��/! % �` I, EDI591 411444418 ' {/// T AN (630844( FOR 011111145 AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED AUGUST 07, 1972 7 /,77I O9 A5 147141141148 N0 104924 OF OFF1C1AL RECORDS 16 FAV06 OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ° / P --A EMI 612*448Y. 549 / f/ ^ i\\ AN 4ASI1411T Fig PR(LINE AND INCIDENTAL P0970600, REC4WEO MARCH / \ 10 5, 1994 AS nVIRNISHI. NO 25952 OF OFF(C1AL REWMO5 IN 081541 OF SOUTHERN j / CA1JF0%pA US4X.14.69 / `,,f /! '4g\ . AN 4*. DlT ECM 41PEL1468 M0 $41,96 PURPOSES, F1ECOIWEO 4145/4485 /4,1110 AS / a',� 11 / IN51414NI1117 1410 65 (11544( R([u705 81 EAYriI OF 50516411 M4nCPIR 77STER °0 / / @ 858411 O. Pp1567 0611010146 15,1 1431 110. 7111.0154530 4146(460 801 41(5 6 23, 20(7) / / y 4. 12 A PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES AS SHOYM AND DEDICATED HEREON M641 ` /\ 'Ye .�� 'r Y �'8 01 A PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR SLOPE PURPOSES A5 SHOWN AND DEDICATED HEREON / \ 10y 4 511 O51 EASCNENT FOR DRANAGE AN0 PIPELINE PURPOSES AS SHOWN AND DEDICATED \ 14 HEREON. 181 v \ S (72,1 AN €443511511 FOR PIPELINES AND SEWER PURPp25, REC11POR8 JULY 22, 2016 AS.. \\ 111546(41040 110. 2016-0308175 OF 055161AL'X254i0S IN 449641 OF E051E411 MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, 850 N..„,.., 16 5' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT A5 SHOWN AND DEDICATED HEREON. 17 PROPOSED EASE1ENT FOR CLASS 1 MULP-USE TRAIL TO BE DEDICATED HEREON O1 PROPOSED 5' EATENFOR CLASS I MUL6-USE TRAIL ALONG NICOLAS ROAD A5 8 OI7 540961 AND DEOCA1F0 HEREON. AN 8444654NT FORA PRIVATE DRIVE, PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND INGRESS AND (;-&\, 464459 10 AND FROM THE DETENTION BA5N AS SHOWN AND DEDICATED HEREON IW [44576111 4401 04(02I66 AND SEWER PUM6EES, REC0N145 JULY 22, 2015 AS 20 1461116656141E 1616-6306176 Of 055I061 46154105 IN 14555 OF EASTERN IOURO44!5 RAO 41I59µ118 444 Ep9EMENT 0711 46318 05EC815 AND INCIDENTAL PUi6V5[61, RECOW50 JANUARY 21 L 4.747. AS INSIRMWIPI RD MU -90759 OF OFFICIAL 9.604485 IN 06901 OF 014010 CALIF60TM 261156 058196 AN AL0F0S (445590441 1044 OKRESI AND EGRESS PI?4R99ES, NEO(AD10 .UNE 13, 2017 22 AS 1LSIRMW,11f N0. 7717.0136391 OF OFFICIAL REMITS IN AWN OF EASTERN MUYIC1(F1 4455114 047967 23 A 25' WIDE EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE UTILITY PURPOSES OVER LOTS 82 AND 63 A5 SHOWN AND DEDICATED HEREON 851 / fr � // R58 // // / H �� Y N /// OPEN BB d SPACE \\ aha / / \`\/ )- , 13 \.. k 7,•>: / // 850 / 882 581 885 L A4g1Q Ai R4FA N i� M P!F 518. m � ' 4or43, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA CURVE TABLE 0111 gta 4muR LENGTH CI Mbr 4826' 42 41• C2 419'21' 266 50' 29 Jr iJ ewe 132.170. C4 5/7,2.45 N.57 19.42' 30.50' 5721' 96'4!74' N.14' C7 4410'56 44.70'. 10 LINE TABLE ONE I 6URMC 4[A2144 LI I N 14°48'15' W 31.22' N.13N1 sr 03 N 14'46'15 W L40 T F 89'53'40' i far JO 00' 1y47Y N� y HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC_ NICOLAS (pUBLIC 5?I�E PAUL R. HUDDLESTON JR„ P.L,S. 7083 ROAD FEBRUARY 2016 SHEET5 OF 14 SHEETS 0 20 40 8l! 120 166 SCALE: 1" = 40' 434412 S.F. 93 PUBLIC PARK 6.449 ACRES 84 OPEN SPACE 1.099 ACRES a0 82 0 SEE SHEET 6 WAY 3© \ NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTES SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEET 6 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS AND EASEMENTS 33 " SEE SHEET 8 SEE SHEET 8 89 DETAIL "G" 1916. IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, D, 1, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES. INC CURVE TABLE CURVE 1Rh ROW FEWRI 0 6J9'06• 500.00' /550' CN !PIM' 41790' nel' Cti 91940 •T!V %.//' OE 1!'1,91' 42.50' 6059' CN 7r'rO4• (O60. _ 74.71• C17 IP2311' 270.50' tap an 711919.' 10000• 7602' C!► warn' H97 SEE SHEET 5 PAUL R HUDDLESTON JR , P L 5 7083 LINE TABLE LINE 6E5Rx90 IOCW !a 41 VOW E roar to 14 4T1201' t Seer 146 4 41'z5'2T w 917 149 7J141 r 3D0' 5 FEBRUARY 2016 6 70 40 B0 SHEET 6 OF 14 SHEETS 120 160 SCALE: 9' • W' FOUND 1 I/2" BRASS CAP STAMPED 'RCE 26457', DN. 055', ACCEPTED A5 C/L INT. NICOLAS ROAD 11TH NORTHEASTERLY UNE / RANCHO TEMECULA PER 4040 7. 84 OPEN SPACE 1.099 ACRES 93 PUBLIC PARK 6.449 ACRES rz6 a' 1/4516110 13147 1110117'731 69 '8'►r. 66 t a '4i'47e lass' 0 85 OPEN SPACE 1.369 ACRES Ivp1.3p'y1j 'te+424f'44 50 r 41Ye'e itrie mit Vire 191 ox. 59 Loire le • FORIr 4=11=1475• �, 1=1675'-' ws 65 4 a 60 !PIA 1 Aac erl5h3^e were leer ll'15, 315,,4 141!1 64 61 88 NOTES: SEE SHEET 8 5[8 9118[T 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTES. SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEET 5 AND 7 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS ANO EASEMENTS, SEE SHEET 9 W 241 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIOE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, 0, E, F, 1 AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA SEE SHEET 6 LINE TABLE 488 OEL1A 118818 111 8 8108111- 8 7337' 912 r 40'43'53" R 2155' 143 8 prr3514' 6 7371' 949 N 319181 € 0 O 115 N 47'36'28' E 5254' 886 If ird,r9r 8 r1,PS 017 N 1048'19" W 46.00' 418 N 77.I1'41' E 17.18' 841 8 4Ye0'141 8 587 L20 N 7636'30 E 25.50• L21 N 13°2.370" W 73 92' rn 8 1999JY r 413r'_ 123 N 13523'30' W 3196' 024 N 2..52'51" W 2386' 125 1 row... r u:U• 4. ,y'y6.53�'11' RAD 15 Bi HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC PAUL R HUDDLESTON JR,, P 7083 L ,,9l e ,440.6%gr .• PARCEL MAP 1000V 00 PM UM -5 93 PUBLIC PARK 6.449 ACRES FOUND I" I6, UP 05 IN CONC, TAC 'RCE 2645)", ACCEPTED AS LC SEs. 111 13 RR ]- SECTION 19 FEBRUARY 2016 FRAC©, SLS(. 00, TVS, NM, 4p 'elk 4 Ce,,, CfA, 4 r 0 20 40 80 SHEET 7 OF 14 SHEET sr 120 ! 01, SCALE: (• . 40' CURVE TABLE CURVE OEL1A RADIUS LENGTH nor 5t'Ir Met _ CO' 171 561.71550 2n 51' H 79' C72 2'3425' 82050' 36.86' W r.Hvr X5447 0014' 619 788'441 &VAX 1611- 611625 625 0.3409' 80000' ?80 636 189510 084 4/St or 76'21'14` 46301 3i or 128 1121'12• 229 50' /J54• 171 1691'+1" 259411' 6134• UNaEN'" 1\ .1, RT or ‘,..7.2.0) .. 1) 1i ��il --L C] cl. XI Z DETAIL "C" 4905. 85 OPEN ir %"Y SPACE 480 1.369 ACRES v NI6°12'03"6 17.0^ ., 481 .-466: .9741 880 le 5 5.15F•7711' 1 v4•� Off OO .6 1556'511551 ISO JS H • !^ 103'16y1.6'.10017' - . SVGS •,• y t 006 ;. y 46, ig 56 rp 53 '1..t:55' 'err -.01 54 • t .'"076 633551'44"4 438'. : 4 A. 5541 N1e•75m�4' � �i5�. A ..•• NCRES s 5 ,J •' y1..54'- Y P 1 41T cyLa r .1.,.E ...• r �� N5'09 01 E •Aa sr C'i1 ��. r, y1 -RAD 500' C7T 1L01 N, ,'c®,n1pik . m5� a i u a roman nij-G � 5-a. 5�„,,, . 1-w ;l F `1- °` 86 18.7117• 11•s5air •� ` •+ 2,384 S.F. q ••''� 16 21 OPEN SPACE 0 1.. $•, FIS a' y 89 6 -{ 43 r d W 46 az+ 41 % 42 94 14cn �• 6 ' 977 9® 99 w 20 gat,4 421 25 455 94 18 SEE SHEET 9 X46 87 3,035 S.F. OPEN SPACE oret,5Q7'1elm 500' SEE SHEET 10 NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTES. SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEET 5, 6 AND 8 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS AND EASEMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, D, E, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC FEBRUARY 2016 PAUL R HUDOLESTON JR„ P,L 5 7083 NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTES SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.. SEE SHEET 5 THROUGH 7, INCLUSIVE, AND 9 THROUGH 14, 84CLMFVE, FOR AODIIIFjjAL LOTS AND EASEMENTS. 17 NRC S15EET 14 FOR AMINAL TRAIL EASEMENT ALIGNMENT CURVE TABLE c11ne mu 4.045 68)48168 C8 8•.j/Or 15888 7J CH 114'41 54100' 6558' 68y 1y8'8e SAI 514 4114' CI6 4s4'4r sato. 4911' UP S'417Y 45.50' 7.90' in ,58001 2728 7.47' C44 3'00'05' 32650' 82,08' 648 79408'44'' 2888 1032' G1 8JTn2" 7130 8045' C47 7,40'57 32650' 1378' 8'/8 1'17117' 27530' 0Ar co 8)47170' 7850 8774' C50 70.07'21" 34.50' 4772' 071 4yY7Jr 18'» 16.35' 5 SHEET a® SEE 21 SHEET 8 OF 14 SHEETS N G 74 44 40 120 :001 SCALE: 1" 4, 44' SEE SHEET 6 205' pq 215]'--"I 76 '4_ '8 5 FY 06 104'1144'. 04 R ▪ 77 • r,*.QT fPRwa ▪ 4_1S S9 ,,.I'O'45`i5`4 500' T'. •4•L. 14 a 9B 89 OPEN SPACE 1.753 ACRES A 32 51 30 4 e - Elg \804G� \ w4475'4 a cC1 r• .. ' Ssv` ..n•I}-, _ . �,..k�;11.7,15,-HH ..w 14543 St. 1+40 RR COURT 76 1. a-0. 1114 L;.w 4® 454 VVVI- E- T) 32 11 SEE DETAIL 11H ON SHEET 14 SEE SHEET 11 ✓ 91 DETENTION DASIN SEE SHEET 11 LINE TABLE 4761 418718 L4 N 4641'48' E 2187' i5 R 'Myr 4 1534 L7 N 4343'Jr W 72618` 18 I N 89'17'35' E 6 22' IJii I A 849/4)4' • 4877' 136 I9' N 36'43')]• E 1774' SHEET 8 OF 14 SHEETS N G 74 44 40 120 :001 SCALE: 1" 4, 44' SEE SHEET 6 205' pq 215]'--"I 76 '4_ '8 5 FY 06 104'1144'. 04 R ▪ 77 • r,*.QT fPRwa ▪ 4_1S S9 ,,.I'O'45`i5`4 500' T'. •4•L. 14 a 9B 89 OPEN SPACE 1.753 ACRES A 32 51 30 4 e - Elg \804G� \ w4475'4 a cC1 r• .. ' Ssv` ..n•I}-, _ . �,..k�;11.7,15,-HH ..w 14543 St. 1+40 RR COURT 76 1. a-0. 1114 L;.w 4® 454 VVVI- E- T) 32 11 SEE DETAIL 11H ON SHEET 14 SEE SHEET 11 ✓ 91 DETENTION DASIN SEE SHEET 11 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 9 OF 14 SHEETS TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS I, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, D, E, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC PAUL R HUDDLESTON JR., P L 5 7083 SEE SHEET 6 B6 SEE DETAIL "D" B® IMY.rI'YdU 14 411 0 2G.2 20.5' it 6 3a a cps LINDEN CO uRr 1:10 's1+'as5r�i fPeiY" STREET)=Ia1'L�rr• 01x50 n 4r4y'11'• h GE 9 36 65 w•4r FEBRUARY 2016 7 20 40 BB 420 6610 .52 60 64 61 s DETAIL "D" y W G6 LOT ' 416.5% y -••• 1.417 ACRES .w'„c- . r.sl're'af 0.41c�' .. ev'rr94' • 49 SCALE: r . 40' LINE TABLE elvr 8EMRN0 LENOIN 41 1111,1.1.1c W' 21r1, 41 10 1r4TJS• r lit 29 N 1452'31" E 29.43' 12 :M 45YN2s r n.4r L,r .N AN. vr• 1.410 227 N 15.53'24" 1 5381' 411 60 15189• • 4411 229 N 7406'36' E 59"00' 230 H 2702'04- E 29,17 134 1 61,1111' 1 4059' CURVE TABLE so' r gam T RADIOS LENGTH _ 014 13140 511111 stir 215 9256'44' 520.50' 63.10' CI6 6.56'44- 50000' 6061' 046 103311 P»40' 0159• 034 4045• 3A8' 809r CA rRdY 39= 4044' C•ll 013.31 40405 .4010 C40 123706- 504 50 110 32' 044 041l'1r 315' 4Rr.' 4i 441 557'0.51.5 27.4E- 8: a 5® river SEE SHEET 10 25 24 .41 41 g —• `5 1 f", * '3rd p•30?04' Lr1021L __ --Z4•4 44 St•„ •' •• _ ' •••••'•s -:W , sr_ 714 L 559E . tit 1r 10.11 70:11: ; .x rsa r • • uY1arP y F I`.. .u; L01 R/NATE STRfE7f LOT "I" "2545 S.F. 3"° Y a dy ••va era`. • 7 t 051 P9 W DETE TIONr' 3 2 EGGIN Fry 3 % r. "_Mal•a. e•' ."P C _..rYZ 6 S J' • �\ $ 6551 4 aY a• 5 115{3."" 13 ..�_f.., 1r 3.I HJr�y r• .. ..... __--,---.1-.1...-'-:::-_-_-.7:7:::-1:::::.:-.:1:-: TT z; h ."� ve -.{•-- ._._ _-...-.---.• INS -•' NOTES: _ ;Y�r-" o SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. 20 SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTES SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES 88 - - N-- - SEE SHEET 5 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, AND 10 THROUGH 14, OPEN SPACE INCLUSIVE, ADD15104LOTS AND EASEMENTS. 17 SEE SHEET 14 14 ,1L FOR A(04044L TRAIL EASEMENT ALIGNMENT 38.844 ACRES SEE SHEET 12 SEE SHEET 10 IN 147 CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PACE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PAUL R HUODLESTON JR., P L S 7083 CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA 544110 if..., C1! 1471.1r 7.7134. 73 51' CTO lrRl'1r 110.00' PIM' CJ0 813'56' 545.50' n r C!! T17.1"4Y 1190' 35.90' C.40 15Sf92_ u.Or F24r CJJ 4°09'17 52500' LH CJ4 11x1'31' 18504 38.07' C35 IY7iIr $83.6* IIL$C C36 4'12'49' 525.00• *11. Of 4'IJ'JI' 98508'8 72' C38 r145r 98IW' Illi C39 85356' 501.50' 7249' C40 17.1781' 581.9 OIT WC? C41 ewe 11i5P' 1024' q _ k. y .'` NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTE SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEET 5 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE, AND 11 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS AND EASEMENTS, 0 SEE SHEET 14 FOR REGIONAL TRAIL EASEMENT ALIGNMENT 4& SEE SHE" SNEEr SEE 51 4. o f� R LINDEN DV�... 44 SEE SHEET 7 FEBRUARY 2016 SHEET 10 OF 14 SHEETS 0 20 40 MO U0 160 SCALE: 1' = 40' 55 LINE TABLE or fL4+1'P8 544110 726 N 1553'24" W 11 3, 01 0 frSY8(0 028 N 15'53'21" W 11 29" 029 N 745636 E 5100' CSI 4 8.20440 C 2111' 731 N 58.492Y W 21 12' 732 N 455417 7 5000' !SI W I17S9r ■ 1CLI' LH M [5'4I9r S f440' 0D p1.4Is5t 04 @, '1 MULBERRY COURT {10t 55Ei uaa' l;r 2411'=�'t1� .LOT .j'j°4i 15`584 S.F. xIn 0.0 rt 4e .379r 940 SEE SHEET 12 fia arc IFp; f r 2O 20' 88 OPEN SPACE 38.845 ACRES Y SEE SHEET 13 11 8 v5 W LINE TABLE 4K 1351944 WATT L35 N 84'56'54' W 1916' CURVE TABLE CURVE 04114 017 nuir 45.50' C43 15'50'09° 27.00' 746' C44 3•oa'as' 32650' 12 LW 045 28'50'44' TO 50' 1032' C46 6750'24' 34.50' 4085' cN roar 22650' 1529' 6Q=a8a 6 a� IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PACE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA SEE SHEET 8 9 58 B\ 4\ - 1112 z HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC PAUL R, HUDDLESTON JR., P. L,S, 7053 o ®S OPER SPACE MS ACNES 1 FEBRUARY 2016 S2 S1 SHEET 11 OF 14 SHEETS 0 20 40 80 400 160 SCALE: r • 40' SEE SHEET 8 SO CI • ..S.0 I •PRIVATE STREET COURT C 3913. rxo'ar I Iv ,yy _ _ Il.sn' * 545 S.F. 71 USE YM -CE 16 k 'rP LOT IA \ • SEE DETAIL "H" ON SHEET 14 61y WO 2'62 1408 IN { 2" IF,. fU998 9A8, 11 LS 5581 , P{4 kk FOUND M' IV., RUDE TAG, I` 9ED 2558' PER R2 NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET SURVEYORS NOTES SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEETS 5 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, 12 THROUGH 14,INCLUSIVE FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS AND LASE4ENTS. 0 SEE SHEET 14 FOR REGIONAL TRAIL EAS IEIIT ALIGNMENT 43/p. FOUND 1" I P„ RUSH, - TAG, •LS 2602" PER 141, g49 FOUND 1' I,P„ RUSH, TAC, -LS 2602' PER R1 91 WATER QUALITY/ DETENTION BASIN "A" 20,876 S.F. --4.30033' 9•]0.69 HIMPutic .-•... 1'-'W our ... • . "---4- 88 OPEN SPACE 38.844 ACRES 24 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A. 8, C, 0, E, F, G AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PACE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC FEBRUARY 2016 PAUL R HUDDLESTON JR„ P LS, 7083 g49 X49 260 259 4 FTOUGN, D L1S" 2602.'1 -PAX 0 1- FOUND 2.02' HUB. FLUSH, NO TAG. ACCEPTED AS COMMON CORNER BETWEEN LOTS 249 AND 250, PER R1 RESET 19TH 1' IRON PIPE WITH TAG LS 7083, FLUSH. SEN. ESTAB BY HOLDING RECORD DISTANCE FROM 2"42- HUB PER R1 4HAC©T MAP gE308 19[3 63,9-0g SHEET 12 OF 14 SHEETS p 30 60 120 140 240 SCALE: 1' • 541' SEE SHEET 11 r' 1" I,P, FLUSH, TAG, O 'RCE 26457" PER R2, i(-�_-,. - -�� -,rte 1F5":".• w FF 4. _ Y11, 8 1"; `pia"y ,•,- ....................................... OUND1" PFLUSH,f¢J1' TAG, 'LS 2602" PER R1, f � � 88 OPEN SPACE 38.845 ACRES FOUND 1" IP, FLUSH, TAG. "L5 2602" PER R1. NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTE 1 O3 SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES _ SEE SHEET 5 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE AND SHEET 13 - . 1HR0UGH 14, INCLUSIVE FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS AND _ 4 EASEMENTS. 1.s�- r .. --- SEE SHEET 14 FOR REGIONAL TRAIL EASEMENT 1 17 ALIGNMENT Y •-__•-.�_•-__..,..•__•____ ..._---___--(- SEE SHEET 13 17 19-'-i-: 4.1 81 ®ETENTIO I 65511E •5•Mt5 r 1036' 1 �•'-#aa'>a}yy 353• 4 8 05,70 4 117B'777 • 3 11" ,...41.1.104Z3 3a' ."..111.3.11•15.E 2597' 8 •g-14 .t.c¢T 3906 R15'22'0C 3 e6 8 304 :._.waY1T� MAB 4.1170 mI'WRfi T .Ao rt -Ftp) +s L 1 20 Pia 021'SrIVY } i V 0 y C SEE SHEET 13 SEE SHEET 10 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 36479 BEINO A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, 8, C, D, E, F, C AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PAGE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER. CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC FEBRUARY 2016 PAUL R HUDDLESTON JR , P L,S 7083 9 410/ °'JRr (oTH., SEE DETAIL "E" HEREON 94 10 SEE H oo 41 ,d® 250 ;;,-%-;,•• ';y 11 88 OPEN SPACE 38.845 ACRES FOUND 1' I,P„ RUSH, TAC, 'LS 2602" PER R1. OFT FOUND 1' I,P, FLUSH, TAG, 'LS 2602' PER R1 2V2 £S 2779 T 1°QC©T PA/1P S3E1£33 270 LIB QV9-86 FOUND 2" LP., ON, 1.0', TAG IS 3483", PER R3 9 • RP 46, OEY LINE TABLE UNE f BEARING IH . wine i 044 N 521555' E LENGTH _t -PP IElf' CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA WAYS 4866B1 '>3'1 iTSIC 6150' 952' C59 14699' f%66' 771T' NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, E SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTES :E SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES TE SHEET 5 THROUGH 12, INCLUSIVE, AND SHEET 14 FOR vUITIONAL LOTS AND EASEMENTS r SHEET 13 OF 14 SHEETS 9 50 100 003 3179 400 —1a SEE SNEEr - FOUND 1' IP., FLUSH, TAG "LS 2501". PER R2 PORTION OF 2440 EASEMENT TO REMAIN SEE DETAIL "A" ON SHEET 3 SCALE: 1' • m9' 2' DETAIL "E" N T.S. FOUND 1" I. P FLUSH, TAG IS 2501', PER R2 0 FOUND 1' IP, FLUSH, TAG, "LS 2602' PER RI FOUND 1" LP AND TAG, "LS 2602', ON 1,3'. PER R1, MACY MAP 290 9 P1 E3 2 0/g£3-69 FOUND 1" IP., FLUSH, TAC. "LS 2602' PER RI SFR, I' I,P. TO BE §[1 ESTABUSHED BY INTERSECTION. 'ti t ANGLE P64 83 f 6=24.5639' ,714.71'4' 19`14'44" R=320 50' L44411` .• 411+ IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFO: 4 TRACT NO. 36479 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 TOGETHER WITH LOTS A, B, C, 0, E, F, 0 AND H OF PARCEL MAP 9783, FILED IN BOOK 54 PACE 45 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES. INC 1=13972 PAUL R HUDOLESTON JR , P L.5 7083 41 1.1..1' �9 ~ 42. RFD! NY a$ a16°2957 s DETENTION 17 - EASIN "A" OM OPEN SPACE z 33.344 /taxa wwts46nry4t l ' 7P40 nmxlr "_ iv +4c DETAIL "F" SCALE 1' . 10' 5.15.12.5.1 443 SEE DETAIL "I" jON REO} FEBRUARY 2016 CURVE TABLE 41RRF CO M 4�AaA9'I.§� LENGTH 7.7 144'77 413 7.44 C43 15°50'09' 2700' 7.46' 4.1)8 MVO.. 722447 4:04 C15 M94'4Y 2454' 163r CAI 675024' 34 50' 10.85' 440 74497 La 54 4331' C50 /groove .3444' 4771 4.14 4054239• 2050' 16.35' 04 !'4744 .3214! FST C53 96.0.'42' 4854' 214, 4.84 384477 4138 2644. Cd nark' 4404 7211' C56 382255' 3.03. 0.0• 4.17 184017 ILO GO.- 1300' 741 J1)027 1300• 71! C60 672737 200 .14/- }P14, 10, WOW. 6000' 13.82' au 7431T 14ld'Y Lltl• C63 172959' 6000' 44 48' 744 1r2;IX 2%3C N 44' CPS 72427 23444 09.1• C66 2650,2' 2050' £!6' 472 ga6'7F 9477 5 rr 6.1 1011.14' 2484 7717 C69 1504'39' 329 90' 627 6.!4 Ida FCV 744• 04*' [11 386747 7w 437" 147 736'24' 2700' 1 231 4FJ 8411746 744 C74 0770'11 ?CO- 9.44' 4.23 40'53,4' 7.00' 5.00' 115 47111)4' 244' 574 C77 11)4'47 4170. 9.21' SEE DETAIL ON HEREON HEREON SEE OETAIL "H4 ON 14EREON so 9 OFIdi 055ACE 10144 ACNES 4 ines 141 - .:77:*_-__ - -- V;.""i.-- _ 1 . ---.- •"-- �^---•-'..,u0 -_I W17 k 1 4. 8 04411"3! W,Y1 09 DETENTION ls'1r74'L 5ASIN "A" R.4 40,888 a"r. CD 1 1 S ' ®® OPEN APACE 8®"©44 ACNES 07 0 ZO 40 SHEET 14 OF 14 SHEETS SCALE: 1 - !B' NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SEE SHEET 3 FOR BOUNDARY SHEET AND SURVEYORS NOTE SEE SHEET 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEET 5 THROUGH 13, INCLUSIVE, FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS AND EASEMENTS, LINE TABLE LINE BEARING 050(1,4 .H N *.°1434. 4 9424' 237 N 76.40'45. W !LIP 638 0 1.3524' W 4544 04170'52'9 e+4 FRC ' CIL 073'53541 e.4 PGC X0153 "f-. --_. ...RIOy` Cr4 ---: .I2.`.' •-- --•i 17 DETAIL "H" SCALE: 1' = 10' 90 99 15 95 '.�;` .*►:rte 0'y _ 7 use 1 _ '•J.`=.3-084. `�'�..= 724 '- • 68 OPEN SPACE SEA144 ACRES 94 DETAIL "I" SCALE: 1' = 10' 036.5!'45'[ • • If44 FOL 1;33931778 W4-77i +tih' vbc 40 44 1. yam` 1'13494. W 7 W h SEE SHEET 13 4 NFj.f, WrF_ 7s1 _i_Lji �W -rr- 1)'1- , TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CONSENT Item No. 13 ACTION MINUTES August 8, 2017 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District meeting convened at 7:37 PM CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn (absent), Stewart, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS (None) CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 12 Approve the Action Minutes of July 25, 2017 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent) Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Comerchero with Rahn absent. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of July 25, 2017. 13 Approve a Sponsorship Agreement with the Temecula Valley Woman's Club for Use of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Kitchen and Multi -Purpose Room - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Rahn absent) Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Comerchero with Rahn absent. Recommendation: 13.1 That the Board of Directors approve a Sponsorship Agreement with the Temecula Valley Woman's Club for in-kind facility use in the amount of $1,102, for the use of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) kitchen and multi- purpose room. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD Action Minutes 080817 1 CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:39 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 22, 2017, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] CSD Action Minutes 080817 2 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Item No. 14 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Adopt Weed Abatement Lien Resolution for Fiscal Year 2016-17 PREPARED BY: Steve Lankenau, Building Official RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2016-17 BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is responsible for weed abatement for properties that are not cleared of hazardous weeds during the spring and summer abatement season. On April 25, 2017, City Council approved an agreement with Inland Empire Property Services to bring parcels with hazardous conditions into compliance with the Temecula Municipal Code. The owners of these parcels are billed by the City to recover the costs of the contractor plus an administrative fee. If the owners do not respond to the billing request, the City places a lien on the property to recover the costs of abatement. All of the owners were properly notified via certified mail, return receipt requested, of the need to abate weed conditions on their properties and were given thirty days to remove the weeds themselves prior to the City taking weed abatement action. As per the Temecula Municipal Code Section 8.16.090, the lien process requires that a public hearing be held before the City Council to take comments from the property owners with respect to the costs proposed to be assessed against their properties and to confirm those costs. The Notice of Public Hearing was printed in the San Diego Union Tribune on August 10, 2017. Following the public hearing, the Council must adopt a resolution for the fiscal year which: 1 Confirms the costs incurred by the City in performing the weed abatement work. 2. Provides that the actual abatement costs will become a lien upon the properties, and upon recordation, in the amount of the costs shown on the attached "Exhibit A." 3. Provides that the resolution will be transmitted to the Riverside County Treasurer -Tax Collector so the amounts of the assessment can be entered upon the parcels as they appear on the assessment rolls and the costs will be collected on the property tax bill. Staff is requesting Council action for abatement during Fiscal Year 2016-17. Upon adoption of the resolution, staff will forward the adopted resolution for filing with the Riverside County Treasurer -Tax Collector and for recording with the County Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: The recording of these liens will enable the City to recover abatement costs through the County's property tax collection system. The City will recover actual amounts paid out to the weed abatement contractors. Further, the City will recover the administrative fee placed on each parcel that was abated by the City's contractors. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit A — Abatement Charges for Fiscal Year 2016-17 RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-17 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 8.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code provides for expedited abatement of hazardous vegetation from vacant lots and parcels. Section 2. Abatement of hazardous vegetation has been completed for each of the parcels as described in the attached list of parcels (Exhibit "A"), at a cost equal to the costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation on each parcel. Section 3. A hearing was held on August 22, 2017, duly noticed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 8.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code, concerning the costs of abatement of these parcels at which time the Council heard all objections of property owners liable to be assessed for the costs of abatement. Section 4. The list of parcels and costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation for each parcel is hereby reconfirmed and said costs shall constitute special assessments against the respective parcels of land, and are a lien on said land in the amount of the respective assessments. Section 5. A copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the Treasurer -Tax Collector who shall enter the amounts of the respective assessments against the respective parcels of land as they appear in the current assessment roll, and shall collect said assessments at the same time in the same manner as ordinary municipal ad valorem taxes as provided in Section 39577 of the Government Code. Section 6. The costs against any parcel of land listed in Exhibit "A" assessed by this resolution and the lien created thereby shall be deemed discharged and released upon the payment for said parcel of the property taxes for the tax year above - noted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of August, 2017. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of August 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Parcel Number Main Address Balance Due 909370044 VACANT PARCEL 1157.5 909370047 VACANT PARCEL 1670 909370048 VACANT PARCEL 955 916400034 VACANT PARCEL 775 916400035 VACANT PARCEL 685 916400036 VACANT PARCEL 820 916400039 VACANT PARCEL 530 916400042 VACANT PARCEL 815 916400043 VACANT PARCEL 930 916400044 VACANT PARCEL 310 916400045 VACANT PARCEL 617.5 916400046 VACANT PARCEL 375 916400047 VACANT PARCEL 930 916400049 VACANT PARCEL 820 916400050 VACANT PARCEL 595 916400051 VACANT PARCEL 620 916400052 VACANT PARCEL 485 916400053 VACANT PARCEL 795 916400058 VACANT PARCEL 705 916400060 VACANT PARCEL 860 919043003 VACANT PARCEL 310 919152004 30551 VIA NORTE TR 3883 & INT IN COMMON AREAS;230 285 920013002 39786 OAK CLIFF DR TR 21340-6;23 285 920090003 VACANT PARCEL 2645 921030012 VACANT PARCEL 530 921040037 VACANT PARCEL 310 921120014 VACANT PARCEL 310 921193002 30065 LOS NOGALES RD TR 3929 & INT IN COMMON AREAS;227 285 921433004 29965 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL TR 20154;25 410 922053047 VACANT PARCEL 420 922054011 28613 PUJOL ST TOWN OF TEMECULA;6 310 922072007 VACANT PARCEL 285 922072020 VACANT PARCEL 285 922190022 VACANT PARCEL 375 922190033 VACANT PARCEL 507.5 922210042 VACANT PARCEL 397.5 922343002 30413 CUPENO LN TR 20319;117 410 940310014 VACANT PARCEL 540 944060007 VACANT PARCEL 975 944100020 VACANT PARCEL 285 944181004 30261 SANTA CECILIA DR TR 8369-1;12 285 944201027 30388 SENELA PL TR 8369-2;27 285 944201028 30378 SENELA PL TR 8369-2;28 285 944201029 30372 SENELA PL TR 8369-2;29 285 944202001 30360 SENELA PL TR 8369-2;30 545 944211002 30326 SENELA PL TR 8369-2;32 285 944211009 31121 MIRA LOMA DR TR 8369-2;41 285 944211011 31170 MIRA LOMA DR TR 8369-2;44 285 944271001 42103 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;5 285 944271002 42117 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;6 285 944271004 42145 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;8 285 944271005 42159 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;9 285 944271006 42173 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;10 285 944271007 42189 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;11 285 944271008 42201 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;12 285 944271009 42215 AGENA ST TR 12189-3;13 285 944274004 30276 SANTA CECILIA DR TR 12189-3;4 285 944330019 VACANT PARCEL 298.75 945040023 30277 VIA BRISA TR 11087-2;23 610 945090007 VACANT PARCEL 285 945090020 VACANT PARCEL 705 945100005 VACANT PARCEL 705 945110013 VACANT PARCEL 420 945120016 43563 JOHN WARNER RD PM 13901;1 575 953090028 31670 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD PM 22554;1 665 957130017 31990 CALLE CHAPOS PM 8535;4 445 957130020 39970 CANTRELL RD PM 8535;3 445 957130022 39830 CANTRELL RD PM 8535;2 705 957170037 VACANT PARCEL 1260 957340020 VACANT PARCEL 507.5 960142013 44762 CORTE GUTIERREZ TR 23174-2;57 410 960271004 44682 LABETA CIR TR 23173-4;39 410 960271005 44691 LABETA CIR TR 23173-4;40 410 962020001 VACANT PARCEL 630 965380007 VACANT PARCEL 595 40796.25 DEPARTMENT REPORTS Item No. 15 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Community Development Director DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following are the highlights for the Community Development Department for the month of July 2017. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES: New Cases: In July 2017, Planning received 15 new applications, including 4 pre - applications, and conducted 3 Public Hearings. A detailed account of current planning activities is attached to this report. Town Square Market Place: On January 13, 2015, City Council entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Truax Development to negotiate the development of the two Successor Agency owned vacant lots, flanking the Town Square Park on the north and south sides of Main Street. A Disposition and Development Agreement was approved by City Council on December 13, 2016. On February 16, 2017, staff received a Development Plan application for the Town Square Market Place. The project will feature 2 three story shell buildings with basements. Each building will total 43,640 square feet. Anticipated uses include retail, food vendors, restaurants, and breweries. Staff received a resubmittal on May 16, 2017. A Parcel Merger application was received on June 30, 2017. The project will be presneted to the Old Town Local Review Board on August 14, 2017. Staff anticipates the project being reviewed by the Planning Commission in September 2017. (JONES) Old Town Boutique Hotel: On February 18, 2016, staff received an application for a Development Plan to construct a five -story, 155,630 square foot hotel. The 151 room hotel will extend the entire length of 3rd Street between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes. A six - story parking structure for hotel valet parking will be located directly across 3rd Street. Amenities include restaurant and retail space, meeting and banquet rooms, and a pool. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report has been prepared by ESA. The comment period for this document was May 2, 2017 to June 15, 2017. The Old Town Local Review Board reviewed the project on February 13, 2017 and recommended approval of the project. The project has undergone signficant revisions since the Board reviewed the project. These revisions include an increased square footage of 175,677 square feet and architectural changes. Staff presented the revisions to the Board on July 17, 2017. The project is scheduled for the August 16, 2017 Planning Commission hearing. Staff anticipates the project will be heard at a City Council hearing in September of 2017. (JONES) Cypress Ridge: On December 21, 2015, staff received an application fora Development Plan to construct 245 market rate residential units in the form of duplex, triplex, attached and detached cluster units. The project will be located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road. The project also includes a Tentative Tract Map (for condo purposes), Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay, and General Plan Amendment. A fiscal impact analysis (FIA) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) are underway. The comment period for the Draft EIR has closed and the response to comments is currently being prepared. The applicant is proposing to provide landscaping along Pechanga Parkway north of the project site and upgrade Pala Park to include amenities and play equipment for special needs. The project was heard at the August 2, 2017 Planning Commission hearing and staff anticipates it will be heard at a City Council hearing in September of 2017. (JONES) Altair Specific Plan: On November 12, 2013, City Council approved an Entitlement Processing Agreement with Ambient Communities (Developer) to process extensive land use entitlements for the 270 acre property located west of Old Town including General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Subdivision Maps, Development Agreement, and EIR. Ambient Communities is proposing a mixed-use development comprised of residential single-family and multi -family units, as well as retail/commercial, open space, and institutional uses. Keyser Marston Associates has prepared a fiscal impact analysis for the project. Staff is working through environmental issues associated with the MSHCP and wildlife corridors and negotiating a Development Agreement. A Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), prepared by ESA, was circulated, and the comment period ended on June 17, 2016. A Planning Commission workshop was held on June 6, 2016, and a City Council Workshop was held on July 28, 2016. A second City Council Workshop was held on September 27, 2016. Staff is working on the EIR response to written comments, and the Development Agreement. In addition, the City Council discussed options for the Civic Site on February 14, 2017, and directed Staff to evaluate a less -intensive use to include a nature center and hiking trails in the EIR. Staff anticipates taking the project to the City Council during Winter 2017. (PETERS) Temecula Creek Inn (TCI) Specific Plan: JC Resorts is proposing a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Tentative Tract Map, and Development Plan for a hotel expansion at Temecula Creek Inn. The project also includes a Fiscal Impact Analysis to evaluate the project's potential impacts on the City's General Fund. Since 2008, the Developer has modified the site plan and project description to address concerns regarding site layout, number of units, traffic impacts, cultural resources, potential Development Agreement, and timing of the hotel expansion. As a result of the changes, the applicant completed a pre - application to make a final determination on the site plan and project description. The current project description, as o July 2017, includes 453 single-family dwelling units, reducing the current 27 -hole golf course to an 18 -hole golf course, on 305 acres located on Rainbow Canyon Road. The Specific Plan proposes five Planning Areas: Planning Area 1 includes an expansion of the existing hotel by 99 rooms from 128 to 227 guest rooms, and the addition of a spa and banquet facilities totaling 153,837 square feet. Planning Areas 2-4 accommodate the 453 single family homes. Planning Area 5 consists of the golf course. A TCI Subcommittee meeting was held on February 14, 2017. The applicant is working with Staff to address issues regarding traffic impacts, extraordinary public benefits, and biological impacts associated with a wildlife corridor. (PETERS) LONG RANGE PLANNING Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Park Service and multiple agencies on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan(W2W). The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula wine country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor and eventually to the ocean. The goals are to identify existing trails, gaps necessary to connect them, and develop and implement a strategy to fill in the missing links. (PETERS) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan: The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council along with the certification of the Final EIR on November 17, 2015. Staff released a Request for Proposal for the preparation of a supplemental document to the Plan. The Sidewalk Improvement Standards being developed will serve as a technical companion document to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, for City staff to use when reviewing development proposals to instruct the developer about the type and distance separation of street trees and light standards, the type and appropriate location of street furnishings, and the plant pallet for any landscaping that may be proposed as part of a development plan. Spurlock Landscape Architects was selected for the project. The first of two public workshops was held on July 17, 2017. (WEST) Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance: Staff is preparing a proposed Development Code Amendment in response to Assembly Bill 2299 (AB 2299) and Senate Bill 1069 (SB 1069) amending the existing State Law related to second dwelling unit regulations. Both bills became effective on January 1, 2017. The new laws regulate parking, type and size of units, approval process and timelines, and water and sewer utility requirements applicable to second dwelling units. Most importantly, the amended State Law invalidates a local agency's existing second unit ordinance if it does not comply will all of the requirements of the newly adopted state standards. (WEST) SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SARDA) & AFFORDABLE HOUSING Affordable Housing RFP: The Supportive Housing Subcommittee directed staff to issue an RFP to solicit project proposals from interested developers for the construction of an affordable housing development. In late 2015, the Successor Agency obtained clearance from the Department of Finance $12.4 million of affordable housing funds. The RFP solicited development proposals that address one or more of the following housing needs: seniors, veterans, special needs, transitional, or supportive. The City received twenty proposals from interested developers. Keyser Marston Associates assisted staff in the review and analysis of the proposals. Staff presented the proposals to the Supportive Housing Subcommittee on February 28, 2017. On April 11, City Council recommended that nine of the original twenty proposals move forward to the next stage in the process. Staff requested updated financial information from each of the developers selected to move forward, and interviews are planned to be held in Fall 2017. (WATSON, LEHNER) Affordable Housing Overlay and Density Bonus Ordinance: The City Council adopted the 2014-2021 General Plan Housing Element Update on January 28, 2014, and the City received certification from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on March 10, 2014. A project processing schedule has been prepared for the Affordable Housing Overlay and Density Bonus Ordinances as required by Programs 1 and 4 of the Housing Element. The Code Amendment will also encompass land use updates as required by Program 3 of the Housing Element. The project is in the initial planning phase. Staff is conducting research and anticipates completing the ordinance for adoption in 2017. (WEST) Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule: As part of the ongoing wind -down of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, the Successor Agency (SARDA) is required to complete a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) outlining the financial and debt obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency. Based on the outstanding obligations that are due, SARDA makes requests from the Property Tax Trust Fund to make the appropriate payments. On January 24, 2017, the 2017-18 ROPS was approved by SARDA Executive Board for approval, and subsequently SARDA Oversight Board on January 25, prior to the state deadline of February 1, 2017. (WATSON, LEHNER) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CDBG Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing: Every five years, the City, as an Entitlement City, is required to prepare an updated Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) and Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The ConPlan and AFH process is designed to help local jurisdictions assess their affordable housing and community development needs. Three public workshops were held in conjunction with this process — two on June 29, 2016, and a third on July 30, 2016. A survey was created to assess resident and stakeholder input regarding fair housing. The City Council approved the Assessment of Fair Housing on September 27, and has been approved by HUD. On February 28, 2017, staff presented the draft strategic plan priority needs to the Finance Subcommittee for review and recommendation. On April 25, 2017, City Council approved the Consolidated Plan. The ConPlan becomes effective July 1, 2017 and will cover through June 30, 2022. (LEHNER) CDBG Administration: The City will receive $515,274 in CDBG funding for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Staff held two technical workshops for applicants on November 30, 2016. The application period for the 2017-18 was open from November 16 through December 15, 2016. Staff reviewed 14 applications for public service providers and four CIP projects. Staff presented the applications to the Finance Subcommittee for recommendations on February 28, 2017. City Council approved the 2017-18 Action Plan on April 25, 2017. (LEHNER) ENERGY & CONSERVATION Western Riverside Energy Leadership Partnership: This Partnership, consisting of eleven Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG) member cities, Southern California Edison, and Southern California Gas, provides incentives to develop energy efficiency programs. Staff worked with NRG EV Services to install an electric vehicle charging station in the 6th Street Parking Lot. The charging station complements the existing charging stations in the 6th Street Parking Lot and the Civic Center Parking Garage, by adding fast charging capabilities allowing drivers to add 50 miles of range in 15 minutes. (WEST) Solid Waste and Recycling Program: Staff manages the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Agreement with CR&R and acts as a liaison between the City, CR&R, and their customers. City staff and CR&R coordinate two Citywide Clean-up events each year for residents to dispose of household waste and large miscellaneous items that do not fit into the standard residential trash receptacle. Staff also assists with outreach for the Riverside County Mobile Household Hazardous Waste Collection events and the Composting Workshops. (WEST) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for July 2017 are highlighted in the following table. Building and Safety Statistics — July 2017 Permits 262 New Single Family Residence 5 Photovoltaic 40 Tenant Improvements 17 Non Construction C of 0 18 Inspections 1,725 Inspections Per Day 64.40 Inspections Per Person Per Day 16.10 Visitors to Counter 920 Non Construction Certificate of Occupancy Tracy's Touch Dog Grooming — 27548 Ynez Road Vitality Medical Group — 27699 Jefferson Avenue Delta Inland Valley Home Health Care Inc. — 41593 Winchester Road Tenant Improvements Tapas Time — 27423 Ynez Road Temecula Coffee Roasters — 43064 Blackdeer Loop Cookie Dough Creamery — 26460 Ynez Road CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of July, Code Enforcement responded to 75 web complaints. In addition, the division opened 112 code cases and forwarded 20 referrals to Public Works, Police, Animal Control, and Fire. Code Enforcement assisted 25 people at the Community Development Counter. The City's annual Weed Abatement Program began March 1, and 650 parcels have been noticed for abatement. As a result, 103 parcels were sent for forced abatement. Detailed Code Enforcement case activity can be found in the following chart: Type of Code Case Total Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 3 Vacant Home / Property Maintenance / Rodent/ Mold 11 Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP 5 Trash and Debris / Dumping 10 Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 12 Green Pool / Vector Control 4 Graffiti 4 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control 2 Trailer / RV Stored/Boat/Parking 36 Construction w/o Permit/Building Code 10 Encroach Public ROW / Trash Cans 8 Other / Homeless Encampment 0 Zoning/Signs 4 Public Safety & Health 3 Total Number of Cases 112 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. The following charts demonstrate the past six months of activities in Temecula. Residential Foreclosure Tracking Commercial Foreclosure Tracking FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY DEFAULT 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 DEFAULT 88 85 82 83 76 72 FORECLOSED 61 61 60 60 56 50 REO 67 76 76 75 63 62 TOTALS 216 222 218 218 195 184 Commercial Foreclosure Tracking ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 JULY 2017 DEFAULT 0 0 0 0 0 0 FORECLOSED 0 0 0 REO 12 10 10 5 TOTALS 12 10 5 ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA17-1033 40750 County Center Dr 910-110-046 Jaime Cardenas 07/03/2017 07/11/2017 Kenneth Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Light Industrial Zoning Letter: a Zoning Letter for the property located at 40750 County Center Drive (APN 910-110-046). PL Zoning or Completed Lederman Planning Letter PA17-1034 32605 Temecula Pky 960-020-044 Jaime Cardenas 07/03/2017 07/11/2017 Peter Monea Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Vail Ranch Town Square ZL: a Zoning Letter for the properties located at 32605 Temecula Parkway (APN 960-020-044 & 960-020-045). 32605 & 32675 PL Zoning or Completed HIGHWAY 79 Planning Letter SOUTH HOLDINGS PA17-1035 33083 Embassy Ave 962-280-022 Jaime Cardenas 07/03/2017 07/03/2017 Carol Davis Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: CPD Events- a home occupation business license for event planning and management services. James Davis PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1037 27713 Jefferson Ave 921-400-023 Jaime Cardenas 07/03/2017 07/18/2017 Jason Criqui Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: 27713 Jefferson Roof MOD: a minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow the building located at 27713 Jefferson (Jefferson Capital Shopping Center) to replace about 15,000 square feet of antiquated roof material to compliant roofing materials. JEFFERSON PL Modifications Approved CAPITAL PA17-1045 41900 Moreno Rd 921-070-025 Jaime Cardenas 07/06/2017 08/08/2017 Traci Miller Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Old Town Motel 6 ZL (SP -5): a Zoning Letter for the property located at 41900 Moreno Drive (921-070-025). Motel 6 PL Zoning or Completed Operating Planning Letter PA17-1047 45773 Shasta Ln Temecula, CA 92592 962-470-045 Scott Cooper 07/06/2017 07/06/2017 John Monday Case Title / Description: SSRECRP, LLC: a home occupation business license for real estate holdings. ELSA S PL Home Approved MONDAY Occupation PA17-1049 32045 Corte Montoya 961-261-014 Scott Cooper 07/06/2017 07/06/2017 Diana PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Malcomson Occupation Case Title / Description: Diana Malcomson Legal Nurse Consulting: A Home Occupation for nurse consulting legals services Page 1 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA17-1059 30573 Greenway Cir 922-291-010 Scott Cooper 07/10/2017 07/10/2017 Peter ( Pete) Peter ( Pete) PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Friederich Friederich Occupation Case Title / Description: Snack 2 Snack: Snack Food Distribution (Direct to Stores). PA17-1060 45786 Classic Way 922-323-014 Dale West 07/10/2017 Kim Amato Dominic Amato PL Home Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: D and K Services: Property Management Services PA17-1067 40955 Temecula Center Dr 916-400-054 Scott Cooper Temecula, CA 92591 07/11/2017 08/02/2017 Rick Rice Case Title / Description: Audi Sign Program Amendment: An Amendment to the Audi Sign Program (#130) to add two "Hoehn" signs 15 square -feet each. Hoehn Enterprise 4 Temecula PL Sign Program Approved PA17-1068 28937 Kennebunk Ct 954-280-024 Jaime Cardenas 07/11/2017 07/12/2017 Jeff Turner Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Solid Rock Designs: a home office for construction administrative services. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1074 29779 Vail Brook Dr 921-551-032 Jaime Cardenas 07/12/2017 07/12/2017 Tanya Lopez Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Tanya Lopez Chef Services: a home occupation license for a food catering services PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1075 32041 Campanula Way , 959-390-016 Jaime Cardenas 07/12/2017 07/12/2017 Aaron Swanton 15201 Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Elevate 85: a home business license for a digital media company. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1085 42006 Remington Ave 909-370-013 Jaime Cardenas 07/14/2017 Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Remington Distribution Center Sign Program: A Sign Program application for the new industrial building known as Remington Distribution Center located at 42006 Remington Avenue. Kasey Clarke Cactus Road PL Sign Program Corrections PA17-1089 32487 Bergamo Ct 959-202-030 Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Daisies & Clovers Photography 07/14/2017 Roxanne Ausonio PL Home Occupation Plan Review PA17-1091 31108 Corte Anza 954-051-014 Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Sharon Taylor Consulting LLC 07/14/2017 Sharon Taylor PL Home Occupation Plan Review Page 2 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA17-1093 43034 Agena St Temecula, CA 92592 945-240-016 Scott Cooper 07/14/2017 07/14/2017 Rama Riahi PHILIP PL Home Approved MACAULEY Occupation Case Title / Description: Top Auto Sales: Used car wholesale office operations PA17-1095 30416 Mira Loma Dr 944-131-009 Jaime Cardenas 07/17/2017 07/17/2017 Valerie Shannon Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: VST Southwest Corporation: a home based business for online retail sales for heath and wellness products. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1099 45948 Via La Colorada 962-161-002 Jaime Cardenas 07/17/2017 07/17/2017 Stephanie Moss Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Temcual Creek Small Animal Veterinary Corporation: ambulatory veterinarian Jeffrey Moss PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1100 31802 Country View Rd 957-762-003 Jaime Cardenas 07/18/2017 07/18/2017 Cheri Seitz Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Zpinkerie: a home occupation business license for retail sales of craft items. No craft classes will be conducted on site. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1101 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-007 Jaime Cardenas 07/18/2017 08/01/2017 Olivia Gray Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Promenade Mall Zoning Letter: A Zoning Letter for the Promenade Mall property located at 40820 Winchester Road (910-420-007, -020, -027, -030, -031) TEMECULA PL Zoning or Completed TOWNE Planning Letter CENTER ASSOC PA17-1106 31743 Via Saltio 961-212-008 Jaime Cardenas 07/18/2017 07/18/2017 Maz Zeledon Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Sacred Pool & Spa: a home occupation business license for a pool cleaning service business. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1107 44891 Athel Way 961-455-087 Jaime Cardenas 07/18/2017 07/18/2017 Casey Riley Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Panic Button Tech Support LLC: IT Services company providing web hosting, network management and consulting services. REFLECTIONS PL Home Approved & ENCLAVE Occupation TEM PA17-1108 41925 5Th St , 407 922-024-013 Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Temecula Film Services 07/18/2017 Bonnie Lowell PL Home Occupation Plan Review Page 3 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA17-1118 30453 Danube Ct 921-471-029 Jaime Cardenas 07/20/2017 07/20/2017 Chad Quidor Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Down 4 Hope: A home occupation business license for online retail sales of apparel and accessories. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1119 27570 Commerce Center Dr , 921-400-062 Scott Cooper 07/20/2017 123 Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Minnett Bakery CUP: A Conditional Use Permit to allow for a wholesale bakery to be located at 27570 Commerce Center Drive, Suite 123 Milford Minett Jefferson Court PL Conditional Plan Review Use Permit PA17-1120 42050 Dir Dr Temecula, CA 92591 921-730-052 Brandon Rabidou 07/20/2017 Blaine Womer MEG INV PL Modifications Plan Review Case Title / Description: Gosch Ford MOD: A Major Modification to expand the inventory lot at Gosch Ford located at 42069 Dealer Drive PA17-1121 27644 Ynez Rd 921-320-038 Jaime Cardenas 07/20/2017 07/26/2017 Rick Bramble Temecula Town PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Center Case Title / Description: Banfield Pet Hospital MOD: a Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) for the removal of an existing door to be replaced with a new window at Banfield Pet Hospital MOD located at 27644 Ynez Road. PA17-1122 42301 Moraga Rd Temecula, CA 92591 944-290-029 Eric Jones 07/20/2017 08/08/2017 Dan Strinden Case Title / Description: Highgate Senior Living Sign Program: A Sign Program application to allow for signs at Highgate Senior Living located at 42301 Moraga Road HIGHGATE PL Sign Program Approved TEMECULA PA17-1130 41453 Ashburn Rd 953-531-008 Jaime Cardenas 07/21/2017 07/21/2017 Rose Gronewold Michael PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Gronewold Occupation Case Title / Description: 951 Virtual Reality Game Truck: a virtual reality and video game entertainment system in a mobile trailer business. Trailer itself will be stored in a storage yard, not on-site. PA17-1133 44894Athel Way 961-457-045 Jaime Cardenas 07/21/2017 07/24/2017 Joe Hernandez Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: The Sun Team, LLC DBA Rytech of Western Riverside County: a business license providing inventory assessment after property damages such as floods and fires. CONTINENTAL PL Home Approved RESIDENTIAL Occupation INC PA17-1136 31471 Sandhi!! Ln 953-551-044 Jaime Cardenas 07/24/2017 07/24/2017 Cirilo Garcia Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Southwest Landscape Maintenance: a home occupation business license providing landscape services in the Temecula Valley area. PL Home Approved Occupation Page 4 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA17-1141 30956 Loma Linda Rd 918-301-017 Jaime Cardenas 07/24/2017 07/25/2017 Jonathan Temecula, CA 92592 Colonna Case Title / Description: Briney Residemce Front Patio MOD: 11'x9' Aluminum Lattice to the front of the residential property located at 30956 Loma Linda Rd. Kim Briney PL Modifications Approved PA17-1142 27280 Nicolas Rd , D310 920-090-010 Jaime Cardenas 07/25/2017 07/25/2017 Roberto Lozano FG Temecula PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Jr Senior Occupation Apartments Case Title / Description: Roberto Lozano Jr Consultant: a home based business for design and construction consultation. PA17-1143 31386 Inverness Ct 953-180-029 Jaime Cardenas 07/25/2017 07/27/2017 ALLEN NADER Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Nader Insurance: a home occupation business license for over the phone life and health insurance sales. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1153 39351 Oak Cliff Dr 920-074-001 Jaime Cardenas 07/26/2017 07/26/2017 Kristen Davis Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Breast4Baby: a home occupation business license providing in-home consultations at the client's home for breast feeding, support and coaching services. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1155 42980 Corte Colucci 955-401-030 Jaime Cardenas 07/26/2017 07/26/2017 Heidi Orrell Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Heidi Orrell: a home occupation business license for animal walking services from clients home. There will be no dog sitting or other animal care services conducted at the residence. JEFFREY T PL Home Approved MOORE Occupation PA17-1158 40417 Corrigan PI 916-520-016 Jaime Cardenas 07/27/2017 08/08/2017 Andrew Mata Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Mata Residence Minor Exception: A Minor Exception for the Mata Residence to reduce the rear yard setback from 5' to 4'3" for a proposed pool at 40417 Corrigan Place Andrew Mata PL Minor Approved Exception PA17-1161 42445 Bradshaw Dr Temecula, CA 92592 955-480-009 Scott Cooper 07/28/2017 08/03/2017 Antiginee Littledike-Sigler Case Title / Description: Antiginee Hippy Boutique: Boutique run along side the energy healing sessions for clients and online sales. PL Home Approved Occupation PA17-1163 28400 Rancho California Rd 921-020-041 Scott Cooper 07/28/2017 08/21/2017 John Davis Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Hilton Home 2 Suites Construction Trailer TUP: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for a temporary construction trail to be used at the Hilton Home 2 Suites construction site located at 28400 Rancho California Road. Temecula HHG PL Temporary Plan Review Hotel Dev Use Permit Page 5 of 6 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA17-1168 42445 Bradshaw Dr 955-480-009 Scott Cooper 07/28/2017 07/28/2017 Antiginee PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Littledike-Sigler Occupation Case Title / Description: Antiginee Awakening Your Heart To Heal: Energy Healing and Emotional Balancing Sessions by appointment only. PA17-1170 916-400-048 Scott Cooper 07/31/2017 Greyson Zehnder Harveston SAB PL Sign Program Plan Review South Case Title / Description: WESTliving Sign Program: A new sign program for WESTliving PA17-1173 43124 Greene Cir Temecula, CA 92592 955-551-029 Jaime Cardenas 07/31/2017 07/31/2017 Rabbi Marc Rabbi Marc PL Home Approved Rubenstein Rubenstein Occupation Case Title / Description: Weddings by the Glass, Inc.: a home occupation business license to publish and sell books. Home used as office. PA17-1174 43040 Argo Ct 945-240-007 Jaime Cardenas 07/31/2017 07/31/2017 Roy Dickerson Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: American Pool Construction: a home business license providing administrative services for a swimming pool company. PL Home Approved Occupation PREAPP17-1 Scott Cooper 07/06/2017 07/19/2017 Susan Murphy PL Completed 048 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Tourmecula Cruisin' Pre -App: A Pre -Application to operate a pedal powered "bike -bus" for tours and events in Old Town. Applicant is proposing for alcohol to be allowed for specific events, if brought by the customers onto the bike bus. PREAPP17-1 0 922-045-011 Jaime Cardenas 07/06/2017 08/07/2017 Richard Beck RICHARD PL Completed 050 Temecula, CA 92590 BRIAN BECK Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Hotel Temecula Old West Reenactments Pre -Application: A Pre -application to allow for Hotel Temecula to put on wild west reenactments behind the Hotel Temecula located at 42100 Main Street. PREAPP17-1 39970 Cantrell Rd 081 Temecula, CA 92591 957-130-020 Scott Cooper 07/13/2017 07/27/2017 Paul Holdaway Case Title / Description: Cantrell Activity Barn Pre -App: A Pre -Application for a 6,000 square foot commercial activity center / educational facility with an attached residential unit at 39970 Cantrell Road. Thomas Gropp PL Completed Pre -Application PREAPP17-1 0 124 Temecula, CA 92592 945-070-001 Scott Cooper 07/20/2017 08/03/2017 Robert Emch Case Title / Description: McGovern Custom Home Pre -App: a Pre -Application for a proposed custom home with Assessor's Parcel Number 945-070-001. Alfred Guenther PL Completed Pre -Application Page 6 of 6 Item No. 16 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Charlie DeHart, Fire Chief/Fire Marshall DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly Report. Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics SINCE 1885 i iY:V DEPARTMENT John R. Hawkins Fire Chief 8/7/2017 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIS Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion, Station, Jurisdiction Incidents Reported for the month of July,2017 and Temecula City Page 1 of 6 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Response Activity Incidents Reported for the month of July,2017 and Temecula City ■ Com Fire 1 0.1% False Alarm 44 6.2% Haz Mat 6 0.8% ■ Medical 507 71.4% ■ Other Fire 6 0.8% Other Misc 3 0.4% ■ Public Assist 3 0.4% • Public Service Assist 37 5.2% ■ Res Fire 1 0.1% ■ Rescue 1 0.1% • Ring ing Alarm 4 0.6% Standby 7 1.0% Traffic Collision 84 11.8% L Vehicle Fire 3 0.4% Wldland Fire 3 0.4% Total: 710 100.0% Com Fire 1 False Alarm 44 Haz Mat 6 Medical 507 Other Fire 6 Other Misc 3 Public Assist 3 Public Service Assist 37 Res Fire 1 Rescue 1 Ringing Alarm 4 Standby 7 Traffic Collision 84 Vehicle Fire 3 Wildland Fire 3 Incident Total: 710 Average Enroute to Onscene Timex Enroute Time = When a unit has been acknowledged as responding. Onscene Time = When a unit has been acknowledge as being on scene. For any other statistic outside Enroute to Onscene please contact the IT Help Desk at 951-940-6900 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 474 170 14 3 4.4 71.6% The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average time HZM, HZMMC, OAC, OAF, OAM, OAMAD, OAMAI, OAMTE, OAMVA, OAP, OAR, OAV, OUT, OOU, LEB, LEO, LEI, BRNPMT, OES, PAA, PAD, PAF, PAO, PAP, HFS, HFSAM, HFSCA, HSBT, HSBTC, HSBTS, HSBTV, HSE, HSG Last Updated 8/7/2017 2:E Page 2 of 6 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction Station 12 Temecula Temecula Station Total Station 73 Rancho Temecula California Station Total Station 83 French 'Temecula alley Station Total Station 84 Temecula Parkview Station Total Station 92 Wolf Temecula Creek Battalion Total Station Total Grand Total Last Updated 8/7/2017 2:E *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 3 of 6 Com Fire False Alarm Haz Mat Medical Other Fire Other Misc Public Assist Public Service Res Fire Rescue Ringing Alarm Standby Traffic Collisio Vehicle Fire Wildlan d Fire 0 15 0 107 1 2 0 7 0 1 1 0 35 1 2 Ii 0 15 0 107 1 2 0 7 0 1 1 0 35 1 2 0 12 2 157 1 1 1 16 1 0 1 0 25 2 0 A 0 12 2 157 1 1 1 16 1 0 1 0 25 2 0 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 3 132 2 0 2 11 0 0 0 3 16 0 0 1 7 3 132 2 0 2 11 0 0 0 3 16 0 0 0 8 1 97 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 4 8 0 1 0 8 1 97 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 4 8 0 1 44 6 507 6 3 3 37 1 44 6 507 6 3 3 37 1 1 4 7 84 3 3 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 3 of 6 Total 172 172 219 219 16 16 177 177 126 126 710 710 Incidents by Jurisdiction Com Fire False Haz Mat Medical Other Other Public Public Res Fire Rescue Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildland Alarm Fire Misc Assist Service Alarm Collision Fire Fire Temecula 1 44 6 507 6 3 3 37 1 1 4 7 84 3 3 Last Updated 8/7/2017 2:E Page 4 of 6 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Total 710 710 Incidents by Supervisorial District - Summary Last Updated 8/7/2017 2:E *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 5 of 6 DISTRICT 3 CHUCK WASHINGTON Com Fire 1 1 False Alarm 44 44 Haz Mat 6 6 Medical 507 50 Other Fire 6 6 Other Misc 3 3 Public Assist 3 3 Public Service Assist 37 37 Res Fire 1 1 Rescue 1 1 Ringing Alarm 4 4 Standby 7 7 Traffic Collision 84 84 Vehicle Fire 3 3 Wildland Fire 3 3 otal 710 71( Last Updated 8/7/2017 2:E *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 5 of 6 MONTH = 7 and YEAR = 2017 and CITYNAME = 'Temecula' Legend 0 Fie ci Other FMlisc Ci Haz Mat G Public Se ce Assist Medical Hazard Last Updated 8/7/2017 2:E ///././ Riv=sidE Ccuntp Fi*e Static^ Res e'vati Dns Casinos Riverside County Fire GIS *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 6 of 6 2017 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals eU1 LIC SAI- ETY C SS TOTALS 2017 Class Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total CPR/AED 19 6 11 24 129 64 73 326 FIRST AID 16 10 0 60 47 4 8 145 PEDIATRIC FIRST AID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCP 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 4 STAFF HCP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERT 1 0 0 0 28 0 0 29 TEEN CERT 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 Total 36 16 11 112 207 68 82 0 0 0 0 0 532 INCIDENT/RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2017 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 5 FALSE ALARM 68 56 51 73 57 62 44 411 HAZ MAT 4 3 6 3 3 6 6 31 MEDICAL AID 529 513 566 486 525 500 507 3626 MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 0 2 0 2 1 1 6 12 OTHER FIRE 5 4 2 8 5 5 3 32 OTHER MISC. 4 3 2 2 5 2 3 21 PSA 42 35 44 39 34 27 37 258 RINGING ALARM 1 0 1 3 0 1 4 10 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 2 1 2 2 4 1 1 13 RESCUE 1 1 1 1 0 0 7 11 STANDBY 14 9 8 12 11 15 1 70 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 69 77 83 71 79 61 84 524 VEHICLE FIRE 1 1 3 1 5 1 3 15 WILDLAND FIRE 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 13 Total 741 707 771 706 731 686 710 0 0 0 0 0 5052 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 �JPPJ k�Po'?- Pe• F P 65 207 MONTH 2016 YTD 2017 YTD JANUARY 30 36 FEBRUARY 16 16 MARCH 71 11 APRIL 55 112 MAY 65 207 JUNE 49 68 JULY 176 82 AUGUST 114 SEPTEMBER 95 OCTOBER 52 NOVEMBER 35 DECEMBER 0 TOTAL TO DATE 758 532 58 5> ■ 2016 YTD 02017 YTD• OG, OF �G�� �O sc 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 ,P�JPPJ k�JP�a Peps F PQ 1.‘ MONTH 2016 YTD 2017 YTD JANUARY 693 741 FEBRUARY 675 675 MARCH 621 771 APRIL 681 706 MAY 702 731 JUNE 702 686 JULY 708 710 AUGUST 699 SEPTEMBER 751 OCTOBER 744 NOVEMBER 766 DECEMBER 829 TOTAL TO DATE 8571 5020 O O e- ��e p� fid" Ot �O .,�O O) ■2016 YTD 0 201 YTD Fire Department Temecula Battalion Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month: July Reporting Stations: 12, 73, 84, 92 Total Number of Events for Reporting Month Reporting Year: 2017 PR and Public Education Programs: Event Type 2 School Event 1 Adult Education 0 1 Total Number of Hours 6 1 Fair/Safety Expo 0 8 Display Station Tour 0 1 1 Number of Public Contacts: 350 20 0 0 10 125 Fire Safety Trailer 0 Other Field Inspections: Total Number of Initial Field Inspections for Reporting Month Total Number of Re -inspections for Reporting Month 0 0 2 0 5 LE -100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of LE -100 Inspections for Reporting Month 25 Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Fire Prevention Referrals for Reporting Month 5 Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc... Include photos if available. The Temecula Fire department responded to over 700 calls in the month of July, as well as several fire and rescue assignments outside of Temecula City limits. This last month was a very active fire month with several vegetation fires in and around the city. Item No. 17 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager Ozer - ..1 . CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jeffrey Kubel, Chief of Police DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Joseph Greco, Sergeant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of July 2017. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 3,279 "Priority One" calls for service 63 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 7.01 VOLUNTEERS Volunteer administration hours 154 Special Events hours 99 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 658 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 22 Training hours 140 Total Volunteer hours 814 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention workshops/Neighborhood watch meetings conducted 0/1 Safety presentations/Training 0/0 Special events 0 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 0/0 Businesses visited 0 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 3/1 Station Tour 2 Planning Review Projects/Temp Outdoor Use Permits 1/4 Sq. Footage of Graffiti Removed 4,701 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 247 Sets of fingerprints taken 35 Police reports filed 8 Citations signed off 32 Total receipts $2,550 SPECIAL TEAMS (POP / SET) On sight felony arrests 13 On sight misdemeanor arrests 18 Felony arrest warrants served 2 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 14 Follow-up investigations 20 Parole/Probation Searches 2/14 Pedestrian Checks 28 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks 55 Crime Free Housing Checks 58 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations 712 Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints 0 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0 D.U.I. Arrests 9 Non -hazardous citations 464 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 85 Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations 0 Parking citations 167 School Zone 0 Seatbelts 25 Cell Phone Cites 215 Injury collisions 10 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 292 Total Cases Assigned 30 Total Cases Closed 23 Search Warrants Served 6 Arrests 1 Out of Custody Filings 2 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service 307 Felony arrest/filings 1 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 10 Traffic Citations 4 Fingerprints/Livescans 202 Total receipts $7,945 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests 0 Misdemeanor arrests 0 Reports 1 Youth counseled 2 Meetings 0 Item No. 18 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: http://temeculaca.gov/270/Capital-Improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Butterfield Stage Road Extension Phase III, PW15-11 Description: Widening of Butterfield Stage Road from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road, which includes widening of Rancho California Road to four lanes through the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road (Riverside County is a partner on this major circulation project). Cost: $6,253,500 Status: Anticipate bidding this project in fall 2017. Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way— Traffic Signal Installation, PW1S-11TS Description: Traffic signal installation at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way. Cost: $315,000 Status: Construction is underway. Anticipate completion by end 2017. Citywide Slurry Seal for Arterial Streets, PW15-10 Slurry arterial streets (Winchester, Jefferson, and Temecula Parkway) with the goal to prolong their useful life and avoid much more costly roadway rehabilitation measures. Description: Cost: $658,750 Construction began on June 7, 2017 and was completed at the end of July 2017. Final review and project close-out is in process. Status: French Valley Parkway 1 Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW113-01 Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $84,704,401 Currently in design phase. Work has begun on the environmental re-evaluation. The Status: City is applying for the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA) Federal Grant Fiscal Year 2017. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 CIRCULATION PROJECTS - continued Interstate -15 State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description: Cost: Status: Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway r State Route 79 South. $50.646,479 Construction is underway. More detail can be found on the protect website: www.1579South.info Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Cost: $11.784,550 Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Status: funds. Anticipate receiving authorization to proceed with the design from Caltrans in fall 2017. Overland Drive Extension (Commerce Center Drive to West of Enterprise Circle), PW16-06 Description: Cost: Status: Construction of the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive to Enterprise Circle West. $8,423,347 Bid opening was held on August 3, 2017. Construction contract award Is scheduled for the September 12, 2017 City Council Meeting. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Margarita Road (Rancho California Road to Temecula Parkway), PW12-11 Description: Rehabilitation of Margarita Road from Rancho California Road to Temecula Parkway. Cost: $3,500,000 Status: Construction began on June 5, 2017 and anticipate completion in October 2017. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 CIRCULATION PROJECTS - continued Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Pavement Management Program Update, PW17-02 Description: Cost: Status: Review of all public roadways within the City, evaluating and updating existing Pavement Management Program software. $275,000 On June 13, 2017, City Council approved an Agreement with IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LLC. The evaluation process Is underway. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Residential Slurry Seal, PW17-03 Description: Cost: Status: Pavement rehabilitation of various neighborhoods including, Harveston, Avendale/Barclay Estates, Woodcrest Country, The Villages, Ridgeview, Promenade Mall at Temecula, Costain Signet, Rancho Dal Sol, Rancho Solana, Verano, Crowne Hill, and Wolf Creek, and the Industrial Area - Westside Business Park Dr. (four commercial streets in the northwest section of the City), and Wolf Creek. $2,300,000 Construction began on May 30, 2017 and is anticipated to be complete in October 2017. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Winchester Road (Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road), PW1 D-13 Description: Cost: Status: Rehabilitation of Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road $1,529,975 On August 8, 2017, City Council awarded a construction contract to RJ Noble Company, Inc. Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 Description: Cost: Status: Widening of Pechanga Parkway between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. $5,000,000 Anticipate bidding this protect in fall 2017. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 CIRCULATION PROJECTS - continued Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk ParkwayNall Ranch Parkway at El ChimIsai RoadrTehachapl Pass, PW1 S-09 Description: Parkway of a new traffic signal at the intersection of Redhawk ParkwayNall Ranch Parkway at El ChimisallTehachapl Pass. Cost: $295,000 Status: Design is ongoing. Anticipate bidding this project in fall 2017. Ynez Road Improvements, PW17-17 Widening Ynez Road from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street to two lanes In each Description: direction, and completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk, and landscaped medians. Cost: $3,380,277 Status: initiating planning and design. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Pian Upgrade, PW1 B-03 This project will update the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Description: adopted by the City Council on September 12, 1995. Public facilities, programs, and right of ways will be evaluated. Cost: $327,570 The consultant, Owen Group, Inc., is currently preparing a comprehensive accessibility compliance evaluation of all City facilities (i.e., rights of way and buildings), as well as all City programs (services, activities, employment practices and communications impacted by ADA regulations). Status: City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS - continued Citywide Concrete Repairs Fiscal Year 2016-17, PW15-04 Removing and replacing various concrete street and park improvements including, but Description: not limited to curb and gutter, sidewalk sections, drive approaches, under sidewalk drains, cross gutters, spandrels and ADA ramps, with all necessary traffic control. Cost: $242.022 Status: Construction began in March 2017. Anticipate completion in August 2017. Citywide Streetlight Acquisition and Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit, PW17-18 Description: Cost: Status: Phase I of this project is to purchase the Southern California Edison (SCE) owned streetlights within the City's boundary, including the Tight poles, mast arms, and Tight fixtures. Phase II of this project includes retrofitting the purchased lights with a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting system. $8,172,144 Agreements have been fully executed and the Application for Filing with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is in progress. CPUC approval is anticipated in early 2018. Interstate 15 Branding and Visioning — Conceptual Landscape Corridor Plan, PW17-19 Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway Description: and Temecula Parkway, Including each Interchange, In association with Visit Temecula Valley. Cost: $100,000 Status: Initiating planning and design. Library Parking — Phase Il, PW13-09 Description: Design and construction of an expansion of the current on-site parking facility. Cost: $2,908,924 Status: Design is ongoing. Anticipate bidding this project in fall 2017. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS - continued Main Street Property Improvements, PW17 20 Site improvements on parcels adjacent to the Temecula Community Theater and Description: Pennypickle's Workshop to include general plumbing and electrical relocations and repairs, installation of landscaping and various hardscape components. COSt: $200,000 Status: Initiating planning and design. Margarita Recreation Center, PW1721 Construction of a new recreation center in Margarita Community Park in place of the former YMCA building. May include demolition of the existing building and pool to Descrlptlon: construct a new 8,000 square foot building, as determined by a feasibility study. Phase II includes the design and construction of an expansion of the current on-site parking facility. Cost: $4,882,985 Status: Community Needs Assessment Is being prepared. Old Town Parking Structure, PW17 22 Design and eventual construction of a new parking structure in Old Town. The Old Description: Town Parking Management Pian outlines a number of parking strategies that can be Implemented In Old Town over time. Cost: Status: $1,000,000 Initiating planning and site selection. Sidewalks — Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement, PW17 23 Description: Cost: Status: Establish programs to remove boardwalk plank boards and replace them with colored concrete sidewalks. $850,000 Initiating planning and design. Currently scoping a portion of the work to utilize CDBG program funds. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS - continued Sidewalks - OId Town Improvement Project (east side of OId Town Front Street from South Moreno Road to North Moreno Road, and south side of Fifth Street from Mercedes Street to Old Town Front Street), PIM 5-06 Description: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. Cost: $265,150 Status: Construction began on June 7, 2017 and anticipated to be complete by September 2017. Sidewalks - OId Town Improvement Project (east side of Mercedes Street from Sam Hicks Park to Fourth Street), PW 17-04 Description: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. Cost: $220,520 Status: Design is ongoing. Sidewalks - Sixth Street Improvements, PW17-05 Description: This project includes adding new sidewalks on the east side of Sixth Street between Mercedes Street and Mary Phillips Senior Center. Cost: $92,557 Status: Design is ongoing. Sidewalks — You Road, PWI7-24 Description: New sidewalks on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and County Center Drive. CDSt: $137,537 Status: Initiating planning and design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS - continued Temecula Children's Museum — Roof Rehabilitation, PW16-02 (City Facilities Rehabilitation) Description: Cost: Status: This project consists of the roof removal and replacement. $200,000 Construction is scheduled between September 11 and September 25, 2017, when the museum will be closed. Temecula Park and Ride, PW06-09 Description: Cost: Status: Design and construction of a park and ride facility in the vicinity of Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street. $2,764,093 Plan revisions are underway. Anticipate bidding this project in summer 2017. PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07 Description: Cost: Status: Construct a memorial to the fallen heroes of our community representing all service branches of the military. The memorial will be located at the Temecula Duck Pond park site adjacent to the Veteran's Memorial and paver walkway. $150,000 Currently in design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS - continued Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park Synthetic Turf Enhancement, PWI5-08 Description: Cost: Status: Replacement of the synthetic turf and infill material at each of the four synthetic turf sports fields. $1,678,411 Construction started in early July 2017 and anticipated to be complete by the end of August 20171. Public Restroom Renovations, PW17-06 Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Skate Description: Park, Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park, Paloma Del Sol Park, Temeku Hills Park, and Harveston Lake Park Cost: $347,800 Status: Initiating planning and design. Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Enhancement, PW12 20 Description: Design and construct a new innovative play area to replace the existing equipment. Cost: $648,888 Status: Currently on hold. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Expanded Recycled Water and Plant Material Conversion Project Description: City of Temecula was awarded grant funding through the California Department of Water Resources and Rancho California Water District for the design and construction of recycled water systems. Project consists of converting potable water landscape systems to recyded water systems. Landscape sites include Temeku Hills Development, Winchester Creek Development, Presley Development, and Crowne Hill Development. Cost: $426,028.99 This is a multi -phase grant funded project. Anticipate bidding the design phase of this Status: project in summer 2017. Anticipate bidding the construction phase the beginning of 2018. Anticipate project completion in June 2018. Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services Description: Cost: Status: Provide turnkey homeless encampment site cleanup within the City limits with the goal to keep waterways, perks, and public space free of encampments to protect the environment and provide safe use of public areas. $100,000 Approval of an Agreement with Rene B. Martinez, Sr. dlbla Rene's Commerdal Management Is scheduled for the August 22, 2017 City Council meeting. Margarita Park Splash Pad Landscape Improvements (Parks Improvement Program) Install shade structures and Improve landscape area surrounding Splash Pad to provide more useful space for park patrons. $50,000 - $75,000 Description: Cost: Status: Project is currently under design. Anticipate bidding the construction phase in fall 2017. Anticipate project completion in March 2018. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (continued) Parks Non -Functional Turf Grass Replacement Project Convert approximately 110,000 square feet of non functional turf grass to a drought Description: tolerant California friendly landscape. Sites include Veterans Park, Temecula Duck Pond Park, Meadows Park and Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park. Cost $150,000 Status: Applications far turf conversion grant has been submitted to Rancho California Water District (RCWD) for $1.00 per square foot to cover costs. RCWD issued Notice of Awards for the Temecula Duck Pond Park, Meadows Parks and Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park. Anticipate project completion February 2018. Patricia H. Birdsall Park Playground Surfacing Replacement Description: Replace ageing playground rubber resilient surfacing. Cost $130,000 Status: Anticipate bidding this project summer 2017_ Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Replace aging playground structures and associated safety surfacing (Nicolas Park, Butterfield Stage Park, Vail Ranch Park, Veterans Park, Sunset Park). Cost $1,000,000 Parks & Recreation Committee Members approved the design plans for Nicolas Park, Vail Ranch Park, and Butterfield Stage Park. On June 13, 2017, City Council awarded Status: an agreement with Miracle Recreation Equipment Company and with PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc. dibla GameTime for the installation of playground equipment. Anticipate project completion in October 2017. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (continued) Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library Enhancement Project Description: Upgrades include interior and exterior re -painting, lighting fixtures, furniture, electrical, and plumbing fixture improvements Cost: $250,000 Status: Anticipate completion by August 2017. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT OF PROJECTS Calle Medusa, between Nicolas Road to La Serena Way Project: Southern California Edison (SCE) Status: Paving complete with painting pavement legends and markers to be done. Minor traffic control for installation of retaining wall. Anticipate completion in August 2017. Diaz Road and Avenida Alvarado Project: Southem California Edison (SCE) Status: Installation of facilities and dry utilities currently on hold. Works hours are 9:00 p.m. to 5:00 am. Anticipate completion in August 2017. Rancho California Road and Moraga Road Project: Highgate Senior Center Ongoing day and night utility work by a private contractor. Works hours on Rancho California Road are 9:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. Work hours on Moraga Road are 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Flagging and lane control at various times. Anticipate completion in August 2017. Status: Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street Project: Gateway to Temecula Status: Intermittent single lane closures for installations of utilities and curb & gutter. Work hours are 7:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. Anticipate completion in August 2017. Vallejo Avenue, west of La Paz Street Project: Hope Lutheran Church Intermittent single lane closures for paving work. Work hours are 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Anticipate completion by end of August 2017. Status: City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST 22, 2017 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT OF PROJECTS (continued) Via Lobo Road and Nicolas Road Project: Arbor Vista (Lennar Homes) Installation of wet utilities, and curb & gutter are ongoing. Intermittent lane closures Status: are anticipated. Work hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Anticipate completion August 2017. Via Norte and Del Rey Road Loop Project: Southern California Edison (SCE) Intermittent road closures are anticipated for Installation of dry utilities and facilities. Work hours are 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Anticipate completion August 2017. Status: Dandy Parkway and Diaz Road Project: Rancho California Water District (RCWD)1 Dandy Distribution Center Status: Intermittent single lane closures for water line tie-ins. Anticipate completion in August 2017. REQUEST TO SPEAK FORMS City Council Meeting 8/22/17 wish to speak on: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: "4 Public Comment Circle One: ITY COUNCIL / SD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: l b vR +,..� � �-} _J� n Agenda Item No. For n Against n Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Address: Email address: t<fi ,t/ Phone Number: _ 4 cy • 61 If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. I wish to speak on: Subject: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA 1 THA / TPFA m/)07 Agenda Item No. rt For Against ti Request to Speak forms foil lic Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. CAddress: Email address: 7'4v1'7 ! S l `Y)_ S ea)9,fran -4'9-! - (27)'r) If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: V )3(29 9n7 /0? I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: (41 Agenda Item No/ For Againstfj Request to Speak forms for -Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name:' off// 7%e / Phone Number: , -- Address. —Address. ' Email address: 0I�44;fric0ilijq!, 7• t o l If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional.