Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout022317 PTS Agenda 'In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the office of the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444 Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting[28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] MEETING AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLICITRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2017, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Mann ROLL CALL: Carter, Mann, Richardson, Sullivan, Hagel, PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of fifteen minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow"Request to Speak" form may be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak"form may be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION REPORTS Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Action Minutes of January 26, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of January 26, 2017. 1 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Calle Ping Colada — Neighborhood Traffic Calming Workshop Update RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 2.1 Direct Staff to Initiate the Calle Pina Colada Traffic Circulation Study 3. Consideration of Multi-Way Stop Signs—Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, March 23, 2017, at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet(including staffreports)will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street, Temecula)after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. At that time,the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website— A+s��.r lFalYcp�cula org—and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting, Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda,after the posting of the agenda,will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street,Temecula,8:00 AM—5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website—wwrw.cityollcmecula.or—and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Ifyou have any questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting,please contact the Public Works Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951)694-6411. 2 ITEM NO. 1 Action Minutes of January 26, 2017 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLICITRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2017, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Hagel (6:00 pm) FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter ROLL CALL: Carter, Mann, Sullivan, Hagel Absent: Commissioner Richardson PRESENTATIONS: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: None COMMISSION REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Action Minutes of December 8,2016—Approved staff recommendation(3-0-1-1)with a motion made by Commissioner Sullivan and seconded by Commissioner Carter. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioner Carter,Sullivan and Hagel; Commissioner Mann abstained; Commissioner Richardson was absent. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of December 8, 2016. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Calle Pina Colada Traffic Conditions Update — Report received and filed. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 2.1 Receive and file the report. 3. City Council and PubliclTraffic Safetv Commission Joint Meeting - Approved staff recommendation (4-0-1-0) with a motion made by Commissioner Carter and seconded by Commissioner Sullivan, with the request that additional photos be provided. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioner Carter, Mann, Sullivan and Hagel; Commissioner Richardson was absent. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1 3.1 Provide further direction to Staff. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT—The meeting adjourned at 6:54 PM with a motion made by Commissioner Carter and seconded by Commissioner Sullivan. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, February 23, 2017, at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Bob Hagel Patrick Thomas Chairperson Director of Public Works/City Engineer 2 ITEM NO. 2 Calle Pina. Colada, - Neighborhood Traffic Calming Workshop Update AGENDA REPORT nn4��,;.�� a 6 6 1 TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission 1989 FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 23, 2017 SUBJECT Item 2 Calle Pina Colada — Neighborhood Traffic Calming Workshop Update Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Direct Staff to initiate the Calle Pina Colada Traffic Circulation Study. BACKGROUND: At their meeting of October 27, 2016 the Public/Traffic Safety Commission directed Staff to hold a Neighborhood Traffic Calming Workshop with residents of Calle Pina Colada to identify their concerns and develop traffic calming measures. The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Workshop, which was attended by approximately 30 residents of Calle Pina Colada, Bravos Court, Yuba Circle, and Salt River Court, was held on January 30, 2017. The residents expressed concerns about the following traffic conditions: • Excessive cut-through traffic volumes • Excessive vehicular speeds • Commercial vehicles • School related cut-through traffic ■ Stop sign violations on Del Rey Road at Calle Pina Colada • Right-of-Way assignment at La Serena Way and Calle Pina Colada In addition to the concerns shown above, the residents collectively provided twenty-five (25) specific items of concern for discussion and subsequent response. The list of items is attached as Exhibit "B". Following a lengthy discussion and presentation by Gloria Whittington, representing the residents, Staff acknowledged that the residents did not support the implementation of any form of striping as a traffic calming measure. The consensus of the residents in attendance was to explore the feasibility of implementing one or more of the following alternatives: • Install VCalm Speed Advisory Signs • Deploy the Radar Trailer • Enforce the 25 MPH posted speed limit • Enforce multi-way stop controls at Del Rey Road and Calle Pina Colada • Implement Weight Restrictions • Implement Time Limited Turn Restrictions • Install traffic signal at La Serena Way and Calle Pina Colada • Remove the gates and open Kahwea Road, Sanderling Way, and Starling Street I • Construct an access road between Del Rey Road and La Serena Way utilizing the City owned property located west of Meadows Parkway Close Calle Pina Colada Based on the alternatives presented by the residents, it was Staff's opinion that a circulation study would be required to evaluate the merits of each alternative identified and identify any associated impacts for each alternative. Staff suggested reconvening a follow-up workshop in approximately sixty (60) days to discuss the results of the traffic circulation study. In the interim, Staff will pursue the implementation of the VCalm signs and deployment of the radar trailer to monitor vehicular speeds on Calle Pina Colada. The Temecula Police Department also agreed to provide strict enforcement of the 25 MPH posted speed limit. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with preparing conducting a traffic circulation study. Adequate funds are available in the Traffic Division's operating budget. ATTACHMENT: 1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" — List of Questions and Comments for Discussion 2 EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP 3 Q w O � w w OZ co ~ a Q > 0 > ¢ a of o Q J z O Lu N C aNi O Of Op Q Z F 7 3 0 U w LL = F a a _ N c p < ¢ w y NT = N UN ^ W WrQ Uw w LLL mZ O � Z O5O O O a N g Lu ma t w � :L s d 2 (n a In 2 aU U) in N � _ r ❑ _ O ! Z aiz m. m O � m� QU' ..� 4 =sy > 4 i j C 0.O LL C N C ? ♦. Rr�� E o U E OY Co 7 a V R- .r. •'1 - d N a7 Z A J J a 1249 Z y. a) ca = a, Za ca qlp Lo LL Y � iH FM _ � I W .: v ' o -� • t Cl) i= CD a P-4 cLU 3 Q" U r� = As10 a jo f ` co w cn m EXHIBIT "B" LIST OF QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION 5 Questions and comments for discussion: 1. What would be considered `normal [volume and speed] traffic" on a residential street? 2. Are we a 'Collector' road? How was our street originally designed? Do we still fit within those guidelines? [note — traffic studies show an increase of traffic from 2500 cars per day in 2005 to over 3500 cars per day as recent as Sept 2016] 3. We can clearly define the source of the traffic — and how and why can that pass-through traffic be diverted to other streets? 4. Define 'collector road', primary/main and secondary streets by vehicle volume — where does our street fit? S. Why does the City refuse to open Kiaweha Street to reduce the flow of traffic on our street? Does that same premise not apply to Pina Colada? Street closures have pushed more traffic onto our street with little concern from the city. 6. Post signs prohibiting commercial traffic, 7. Install 'dips' in the road at Del Rey to discourage drivers from blowing through the stop signs. 8. Install these same dips in the road on Calle Pina Colada. 9. There are 4 speed limit signs on the street — no one sees them — Replace them with larger, more visible signs and at a lower height. Add one more in each direction. 10. Reduce the speed limit to 20 MPH — if not — why not? 11. Install a flashing speed limit sign in each direction. 12. Install Solar speed signs that show driver speed for each vehicle. 13. Install signs at both ends of the street restricting non-resident and commercial traffic during peak times morning between 0700 and 0900, afternoon 2:30 — 4:00 M — F. Enforce with police presence and ticket offenders. 14. Post sign at Margareta and Ave Barca advising of turn restrictions on Calle Pina Colada — include hours and days of restrictions. 15. Place radar and motor officers more often, making presence known - Ticket offenders for speeding and not stopping at stop signs. 16. What is the history or street closures such as Sanderling, Kahwea, Avenida De Lovena, and any others nearby. Why were they closed? 17. If streets were closed illegally, they need to be opened. Our residents were never notified of those street closures, but were left with the diversion of traffic to deal without support of the city. 18. Place a 6-month trial closure of our street, Open during summer months, close when school is in session. Place KNOX boxes to close. 19. Close street to through traffic by placing permanent barrier at top of hill. 20. NO Speed Bumps 21. NO center lines painted in the center of our street 22. NO bike lanes painted on the street 23. NO line painting of any type — this will NOT reduce the volume- It will impact our property values. 24. Lower speed limit on La Serena to 35 MPH 25. Enforce La Serena speed traffic and Make offenders more aware of the speed zone. Turn it into a speed trap. We look forward to working with the City of Temecula to address and resolve these traffic issues and concerns. Thank you for your kind attention! ITEM NO. 3 Consideration of Multi-Way Stop Signs — Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way AGENDA REPORT t)V T�.,�►� TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission + 1989 j' FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer + Acs w DATE: February 23, 2017 SUBJECT: Item 3 Consideration of Multi-Way Stop Signs — Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way PREPARED BY: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way. BACKGROUND: Staff received a request to consider the feasibility of installing multi-way stop signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way to provide interim right-of-way control until traffic signal controls can be installed at the intersection. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process. Butterfield Stage Road is designated as a seventy-six(76)foot wide Major Arterial with two(2)travel lanes in each direction, a raised median and bike lanes on both sides of the street. Butterfield Stage Road carries approximately 14,900 ADT at La Serena Way. The speed limit is posted at 55 MPH on Butterfield Stage Road. La Serena Way is designated as sixty-four (64) foot wide Secondary Arterial, with two (2) travel lanes in each direction, a painted median, and bike lanes on both sides of the street. La Serena Way carries approximately 2,700 ADT west of Butterfield Stage Road. The speed limit is posted at 40 MPH on La Serena Way between Butterfield Stage Road and Walcott Lane/Cebu Street. A review of intersection conditions was performed, which included an evaluation of the collision history and a multi-way stop warrant analysis. A review of the accident history for the twelve (12) month period from February 1, 2016 to January 31, 2017, indicates there were five (5) reported collisions at the intersection. The majority of the collisions are attributed to eastbound right-of-way violations; turning left from La Serena Way onto Butterfield Stage Road. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(California MUTCD)indicates that a Multi- Way Stop installation may be useful at locations where the volume of traffic on intersecting roads is approximately equal and/or where a combination of high speed, restricted sight distance and an accident history indicates that assignment of right-of-way is necessary. There are four(4) criteria that the MUTCD has established for the evaluation of Multi-Way Stop signs. These criteria are as follows: A. Where traffic signal controls are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. An accident problem, as indicated by five(5)or more reported accidents in a twelve(12) month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum Volumes 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any eight(8) hours of an average day, and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same eight(8) hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but 3. If the 85-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour,the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the above values. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values, Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Optional criteria that may be considered when evaluating the need for multi-way stops include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a motorist, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to reasonably safely negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop controls would improve the traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. The results of the analysis indicate that Criteria A, B, and Option A are satisfied and an interim multi- way stop control is justified at this intersection. Staff recommends the installation of multi-way stop signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at La Serena Way. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with installing signs and associated pavement markings. Adequate funds are available in the Traffic Division's operating budget.. ATTACHMENT: 1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" —Collision History EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP 3 Q w ❑ W W H Z m ~ Q _0 U Q } 7 } Q Q Z m U 0 o O w c6 C w 00 af 0 0 Q Z U F LL U U w < E U E — L w ❑w � W to o Q (6 m W x Z L o ° w ~ o 0 z o o D u 0 .Q `2 o m z o 0 o C (0 L 15 -c- u) D = m U O - a� a = mom 1 Im65a- ) a- c) ) u) W a� 5 Q ED ■ z C 9— N O O W C E.-2 > • '6 C Q ► N T N Z E O 0 oc C W _ 4 C N N (n ''r - �--• N U W E O m O } d U z N O > 2P d t`0 N = i• � C � O wn9) J � U V N o Q - j_ - - - L j. 0 w N rr' � r ; o ai Q ..•�„ t 4 a, �- � m C7 ` N �I m �• > O {n 01 O EXHIBIT "B" COLLISION HISTORY 5 h N ` C :L- . O O O Y O r r � N N LL = LL = LL = LL = LL = am ° * `� xt f9u xx n3 ax a: Y N Y C d LL d 11 LL O N O O ci f6 (6 m 0 7 a1 >. Q1 Oa1 _N O U O S S U U O U O U J � Y t a) L C a) Q) C On Cn a) (3) Cn .� a) a) Gn a) C)n a) a) '� N a) J E Lt:: -4S S E S E S D S S a) NO O C C C M C m _O _C O O C C i� O> t00 rOo +`+ O O O p O +� � +� +� O r-+ O O O O O V) 2 2 2 Z Z Z .�C L Z Z z Z Y Q a) Q) Y - a) a) Y Q a) � a) a) a! Y Q Q) Q1 L O C C L E C C to O C ], O C C C C C cu O O m O O O O O m L O O O O O O a c = p U t = p a t p a t t p U s s a LL d LL d LL d LL a *' U U �' U U *' U — U U *' U U +�' O +�•' p +�+ O +�-' O +�' O Ln z Ln z Ln z Ln z V) z O -O OC S O C O -O 'O O '6 Z n m Z �o Z :3 �n Z m o v en Z N ci Z) N C of .--I N D E CCL. l.. E CC V o a25 " � o Co m o o?$ m o Co m m .z Ln 0 , N obn n U ._ ¢ Q) Q a) U +� Q Q a + Q U + Q aJ Q - U �- Q a) Q a) a) S O O a) S E a) 2 N 2E ` a) S O L m (9 � f6 L ca m N fQ O O S a) = O O = 0 O O = S O = O = -FaL p E a Era -a � � a3 E � -FD :2 -FE o E � .y Q. o Q - o LL o v LL o o Q c ¢ o o o a o LL o _ m N 3i N rl 00 L4 0a a 0 OL m Y � a Q N a a Z J N D N u m N J m V a) d p > v v > v v > > v v > a) H Cl) ¢ a o ¢ a o- ¢ u ¢ a OL Q Cl p Y z a a z n a z c z a Q z Q V C W < Q W Q Q W a) 0 W Q Q W O Q OLW) •2 C C lWil •� C C LW) `f- (D w OLI) a) a) w o a) V •Nai Z z ¢ Z Z C O ¢ Ln O O :5 O v o o > o z z g o > z 0 a) V o o `o o o > o o > o o 1.� LL LL co m F cr LL L LL -C LL LL LL F d' LL LL V) O bn U i U V) O C U pn U (/7 On U V) O C U pn U {/) O C U On U 1�I) lam/) V0 00 im) •� loll tN/) t�/1 Z3 W a LAQ Q W Q g Q ¢ W o L" Q W Q ¢ a W Q Q V) Q on on W Jcu W a) C W C U W J W a) Z:) V a) u v a) a) u Q) Q _� m O (6 m fe O m `� m a) Y U m ai Y U > > C > ca O > M O > i d LL ,',, d LL a O O U a) O O O O N > O O o o ;-> O = O p v a o o s o Q v v ,� m ,gym v CO ,gym -0o m ,� m +, m ,gym Z Z t v z Z5 z a) m O v Z M Z •L z Z3 z W o N S w 2 `n o w 2 Loi = �^ LL Z S o w = Loi = " o W = Loi = W v a v v v v v v v ti fn _ _ _ _ _ l� N N O 00 O O O O O O) O N O o Lf) O O N rl V) v) N V) V) cq V) rl V) L) 1-1 V) L) ad r t0 lD LO w \D M o v ov o U o v o v G W \ \ \ v \ \ o 0 o v � on N a m _0 G f+ � O to N [o e•7 O N rQ N a5 00 T- O m O m O S O m ei m N O C O C Q L .N N .y LL O 0 0 to W D -T O O O O C4 o M ai If rl rl V ' U W ko Q N Q Ln Q D_ 1� rl rl Q- Q- In ,-� O- N O- L- O T T i„l > N T i„l T N > N > M T T m m � 10 A F- T W A F- ? F- T F- >. F- T F- F- O 41 C ^ lQ W f0 a) M a) W fm a) M a1 W M a) W rQ a) m a) W m a) m a) LL I C LL m a > a > H a > a > 1- a > H a > a > f- a > a > _ 0 cli � a k « 2 LU ■ LU U Q � © w o $ 3 LU U) $ 2 LL t � § z \ � / 2 k k 0 aj 2 2 « uG2 TRAFFIC ENGINEER' S REPORT t - 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent— PW Street DATE: February 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for January, 2017 CC: Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer—Land Development Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer-Traffic Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of January, 2017. The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by both in house crews and maintenance contractors. Attachments: Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division Street Maintenance Contractors Detail Report Contracted Maintenance Work Completed Graffiti Removal Chart MEMORANDUM TO: Patrick Thomas,Director of Public Works T FROM: Rodney Tidwell,Maintenance Superintendent DATE: February 1, 2017 i I ilii 9 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity ReportJanuary, 2017 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department,Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of January,2017: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 41 B. Total signs installed 3 C. Total signs repaired 3 D. Banners Replaced 57 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 3 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C.repairs 2,786_ B. Total Tons 11-5 IV CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 157 B. Down Spouts 0 C. Under sidewalks 0 D. Bowls 4 V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0 VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations tit B. Total S.F. 2,389 VII. STENCILING A.0 New and Repainted Legends B.0 L.F.of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 0 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic E. 11 RPMs Installed R,MAI N TAW\MOACTRI'T Also,City Maintenance staff responded to 87 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,tree trimming,sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 74 service order requests for the month of December,2016. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 129.5 hours of overtime which includes standby time,specizil events and response to street emergencies. The Lotal cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month ol'January, 2017 was $j9 2), 00 compared to$26,368.0( for the month of December,2016. Account No. 5402 $ 19,295.00 Account No. 5401 $ 40,000.00 Account No. 999.5402 Electronic Copies: Patrick Thomas, City Engineer - Director of Public Works Amer Attar,Principal Engineer - Capital Improvements Mayra De La Torre,Senior Engineer - Land Development Jerry Gonzalez,Associate Engineer - Traffic Division r w — IH C N Y00 O NO �O N �q W fN0 Y N 00 NO 00 Nm m W C W W n0 .0 h0 N 0 O WC I P7 (� n m E 3 Os CD ! M O NO r-U) w V N NM O M �Oj N in n N Ol O N ' ,p{Wp� N m of N O cq N Oi W Y N Q N�- f0 CN (V 09 n W Pj U W U D O N LL 0_ ~ �I N N wwN wN NN NN w w' Nwww w w w o >. N 01 O,O N O ry 0 V O m h n ry N n �p Ol m m N VOID W O O //0C O 00 00 O V V O OI tG t7 f0 O O aa G C M� a} M E N W r 01N N W O f0O V O 01�cn N WI� Ol yf MO OOH O t0 W I"1 wM O O N O N 4 Q y N m N N M U) a a0 O t7 If1 Q M If1 N V N N II r m U)O m w wwww Hw ww ww w w Nwwww. w --w YN N ... .. . W O J F ` W Op p W O W W N n M N N 01 OI h (q, Q J nM O O n0 M rO N t- TIL O W47 M�N O N 01 p f0 LL 3 S' Nn L CL O � U ; V7 c w '•'N ...w.w w NN ww ww w w wNNwN w w V .. .. ,................... ............ O C LU t Y r Y L 0 a v v n p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 v o O O a 0 ai g to `m o 17 n E e L% w wwN ww ww ww w w wwwww w w 0 & w w m �+ W O t .. m U m rc w Y OJ o0 no noono o o v 0 0 00000 0 0 0 .v CL Q o o O� n p U n U W N C O h J Z W N Of0 �O �O (j] a A oOO C! NQU O N ' • ' OD ON ti A N No Cl! mO ' NW sph ci F r LL co E.U r Q w om Ww w wwN 4410 .414 6044 w wto 44 69 w w N MC t ... W O ti w io o f x W W m o fpmp v, a?o OJ ^� 00 000 O v M M O 3IL f N U 16 w mo Oi 0 0,0 D7 w R 9�0 0• m --I W P W m W O O O 00 mo mo m Swf"MMM M e C N J N N 000 O t0 C,0 W O f0 O W W ep W to fU t0 w w www N,[I N�1 N.n N N NNN NN N O R Q w w w w w w w w" 0 At p C � m o ' a "w .p. a ui iri ui .w u. mmmw p, p, C c g tLC CL W Vim o 'n K'N 'ucci OQu.5 Cm =pm F m 0 m U3 p. mo o g MLa s Co LL Lm y 0 0 ' a c ` a w c�: W-- M-- w-. y w J m u 3 o ~ o E > > nLi >� mMZ� f^ v ? 3 w m o UOv d wr N.. a Z m W y W in?: ig� W 0.1 a a m w v m A IF- fA U YS c m m O m `p t7 O N m ¢ 1110 y ,meq LL Z z a 0 o o o a E J U O O e a c p Z Z Z o U z C w pa a F m� LOU: oa m S w IL Mr, Zi Z a w c G 'a a W m U. W C H Z G• Fya- w m 0. K Z W 111 m Q: STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS 1'he following contractors have performed the following projects for the month o1 January, 2017 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNTsTRIs!•;C]E kIAN N1,JJBRTI]G.F OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: Mountainlion Inc. Date: 1-9-17 Removed sand, silt&misc. debris from Vallejo Channel channel # 1096 TOTAL COST =$18,7000.00 Datc: 1-10-17 Via Lobo Channel Removed sand, silt&misc. debris from channel # 1097 TOTAL COST -F—$22,000.00 Date: TOTAL COST Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: Rene's Commercial Mgt. Date: 1-10-17 Citywide Pre-emergent spraying to City open ROW's # 01-17 TOTAL. COST $17,975.00 Date: # TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: West Coast Arborists, Inc. Date: 12-31-16 Citywide Annual ROW tree trimming # 121787 TOTAL COST $1,320.00 Date: N TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $40,000.00 TOTAI. COST ACCOUNT 65402 $19,295.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 R WAINTAIMMOACTRPT cm 0 Ili OIL E 3. 0 'a o V 0 G 0 0 0 W* C, 'i; -0 a) cu 0 U- 0- W09140 vill 41% 40 *A fA 4* to H ------------ w Co 'a a z & 0. G 2 & U) ! � | � � � � • 449, -: L", 4a W-) W-J'! 4, ' ! | ! 1 , g , ' . ! . , � . / j j . i 0 o 0 0�� 01 C)I 41)- 441 W*MI: W91:401, VII: W3,: � | . j , , � | � � , \ j . j , % j . $ o| ! C); 0 0 C, o: o, | • _| � � � � | � | � . E s _ �_ |_ i ! _ wo- va'! 4-k; W: vw: 40). ! j | � � . , | I � ! r e j j j C:�I■ ooi 0 / 0: s01 LU 401. 44 1 40 49.: 401 0 0 0 . 0 C, 0., 0, 0 01 01 0 11 CIII LLJ § ` 3 | | | | D u co, z 401, 4A, V). 401, W)": 1 4.11, 40 U- OZ < Lu WCD z -j N w C:, C); Oi01, CD C,� o EL IL W Q9 4w 401®°4-j" v% : 401, ®; 401� ® 401, w C"i 0 01 M X- 0 in In (D CD 0 M 0 m 0 A A um LI) E 00 a) a) 0 ■0 0 0 0 0 0 ca z -6 u (UD U" LL LL L) 0 u 0 u 0 U u 0 Ec E 0 0 U- 1; 0 a) (A CD af :3 M z ; q / � kQ)m 7 cr cr Z- 70 z -2 < < p U (D U) �5 < 0 0 UA IL z z LU ■Q 0 IL U) 2 g --, uuj) -.0 0 LU IL LU ui u 0 ul 16 PE > .9 w U) z a. P: 0 L) 0 c z 0 o g 4 z LU 0 -0 M I.- 0 cu IL z $ ± ] U) U) LLJ 02 z 2 ! . ] Rj 4 U) m cu -0 C x m S6 LLI -6 U) CL a. Z Q d -�s a) cm MMO (a Z < LU 0 w w LL W 0 C) 4 4 3: Im -5 Slle:)jo'ON Z c 0 0 � a W V � a z Em wm zo Z v to 7 O � W > N Z C� W 0 CO o w � o W Lu N H Y 0I � � O J QO O O O O O Ocm) O O o CD o 0 o 0 o M Ln M N N --� lead ajenbS mLL a LL 0 7 `eY 409 0 N N " co Q Q ao Z M N p N M r r r N r Lld ti � N L(� Of E � Cl ago M M '-' M � r Q a Za W N t � '� Q N 0 Z G n LL Q 5 POLICE CHIEF' S REPORT RIVERSIDECOUNTY • •A■ TMENT TEMECULA POLICE . a . To: Southwest Station Admin From Marianna Kuhn, Crime analyst Date: February 6, 2017 Re: Part 1 crimes for the City of Temecula January 1 — 31, 2017 Total Part 1 calls for service: 330. An 3% decrease from the previous month (340). Temecula Police Department Part 1 Calls for Service January 1 - 31, 2017 250 200 150 100 50 14 Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Theft Rape Robbery Veh Theft *Total 18 41 223 1 7 40 UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category Non Written incidents: 61 Written incidents: 269 Total calls for service: 330 Data warehouse was used to prepare this information. Citof Temecula Traffic Statistics January 2017 Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 716 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 285 Parking Citations 127 Total Citations 1128 Citation Breakdown S.L.A.P. 133 N.E.T. Citations 53 School Zones 15 Seatbelt Citations 29 Community Presentations 0 Traffic Collisions Non-Injury 28 Hit and Run 11 Injury 27 Fatal 0 Total 66 Pedestrian Related Collisions: 3 Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police report. D.U.I. Arrests D.U.I. Arrests 23 Cell Phone Cites Total cell phone cites 107 (23123 & 23124 CVC) Felony Arrests Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints/Click it or Ticket Operations/Special Operations 16 hours of citywide dedicated red light abuse enforcement/grant funded Commission Members February 7,2017 City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Division Activities/Events Dear Commission Members: Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of January, 2017. These activities include the following: ■ Citation statistics(attachment) • Part 1 Crimes(attachment) • Community Action Patrol supported call-outs: None • CAP Meetings: Conducted CAP meeting and no CAP staff meeting • Community Action Patrol activity/patrol hours: 555 activity hours for January, 2017. Year-to-date total: 555 hours 258 patrol hours for January, 2017. Year-to-date total: 258 hours *There were 22 CAP patrols with 37 members participating. • Training: None • Special Events: None • Radar Trailer Deployments: None If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula Police Department,Traffic Division—(951) 704-7097. Sincerely, zvt .44 Officer Joe Narciso Temecula Police Department FIRE CHIEF' S REPORT 0 % \ 2 § { LU E k LL41 « / 2 -i & % ] ) « .§ § IA / 2 r J 2 ƒ c � _ 0 \ \ \ ¥ § 2 % % � f Mn 2 06 x d k $ \ ( D \ § 2 e _ ) _ • c if & > M ■ci ) 0 # � 2 w f E7 § m \ ] \ v . k E § E 0 u °- 2 IL 0 u k \ � 0 3 0 ■ k U ■ � ; 7 to > E ± IE { / 7 ) cck S 0 � CL & f e Ne © c 0 . 9 ! ) !) � - a \ ]!#!) ;I �ff2\I. o ! # P$§e $ ) IN . . ; , . § 0 » 2 \ 0 D & > / f■ ] 7 % o , 2 0 - ® co £ b § 0 % ] < k \ J § 2 = < k ■ k ° $ p n § . c LO 6 = + K c 0 w e� o � = h Cc c + o / 0 $ c k u o 0 0 / « a / %0 FA % _ c 4a 0 _ § § 2 CL 0 CL 0 § a FA E ® 6 ® § ILU ca 2 IM �� k jk 20 � _ ) t § k � K o % 2 m ) { 3 CL { $ § 7m { / ] \ ( 2 « E E n 0 ± { E o< Ln $ + 2 \ M § #\ w f / $ C kU { L � � r J 2 a) j :2 ca E A: ¥ \§ & a � 2 ; . . 0 2 \ } . ■ 2 .2 LL S E 2 / 2 m & u & L � L 2 00 aow w & u) F2 } B / \ 0 M N O7 N 0- LL Ly O O C) O r O O O O O O v w m t 'a LL O O O 0 0 O O O O O - C > O I y p O _ C wN N O O. ti r � N r =3p {N N N N U 0 I a � w a� c O O P, O 0 — Lo O �- y N co C c E n c N O O O O O O O 0 0 O O p CD O O O p O O O r r p O h;, N N 3 N n N ` D! ILL O O O O i) 4 ^ O lir: C C 10 O C u m C O u76 C t y O O O d 0 O N N 0 O o c m 4) a.r � ` m m ` fO t � O O co ,- r- O O O O CO O ` >. w tll vlC) to O lD O O r) m o O O O 01 t- lA In 10 to O O �p d � U O = N O O O O N N O O Q 1 2 N I w E co cD rn rn ti v LL a n s c (D m m m m m m F 30 aui aui a"i aui aui aui N a H •• H H H Fa) F co N C N IV Z U C c C O C NM 3 x d r A OMD � CMM C ^ V G C Q o rz ❑ `a o a_ '7 � N m IS iG 3 n :3 N co it to h Vl 0 0 > VY D. 0) U M - a LD a N N - J w 0 v d m m d V c _A C 7 LL O E2 w N _N w v N T t U. C 7 O N C_ 0 O EE - (O U O N T E a c � N c w n cn 5u rn € ` c_ a IM A o a rc � a� 5u a�CLi C � o O_ C u d o (A LL N N � � H rf C O J V N > WO C a N d � �U V V C ) -I o W O LLY� N m LO lr f0 N C O �p a- 0)N cqN N LO L E n A aD w N C = O N N y E H 00 c ti Q p L N N m co C CL N C M n O N M a U 7 N V H J (, 16 LO a) rn m CL c c w m L_ . C O N C 7 a7 O N m E a) N C O O_ N N 6 � O E C E a) a) IA O N 1 � }1 O •i (' ++ N _N 0 D N r 10 ~ •L c O g N U > O L d C CL a) (A O a•1 C m f0 4) W V N u N o o_ N N c a7 E .Q CD L_ C O M .O a) (a (oo `r C,4 'n v v N 3 NS U o D L N N m N C a) 'U C N M N N O Q O N U •n N a N N N Q O Y7 Q 2 U CM U LL U a7 a O U N a) a) fq fU ii = 2OO � � � � � H > � m J 0 a� - u rn l � i ; L C LL C _ t T. - O } ] _ N Iri N CL to Ii ? N L1J 3'] p -' f C � f 9 AIN f] `� lCj - t^j 3 O O ] �� .3 � � • b s � 45 }.. � eb Ea aD f LL W 3 `i - cc cu ;� x.04• a 5 0 coCL Q t U) A �uuu�7777 N > > Q V_ C Y '� C7 - N ® a w m J 0 0 0 0 v o d o Un ttw 0 o o o U c W c � W o IL o c c� y Q o U ¢ o o W L = L J O a w o U. O w o N L !- J EO O O O .--� O M Q ^ O d' N O to d' •--� N .� c-1 i--1 � U) 0 N U) W r a U Z F 0 h 0 0. = W z iiW W, y ca w z cc Q Q a w w w 2 U 'ts a x 3 aFa Vz >- z Qv < c4CG zwwOsaa O � Q w FZ C (� N � � � QFww c.7Q V ZwvLa C ¢� o. `xw V F. ww o O ¢ � wOFFcn wwF.. cCw o U V wO. x cnvF � Vtz. x � � 000.. o: R: 0.' v� F � � F. r O N �O J� °J Q ��7 CL °2 0 6� g0 U 1J° J Q bio a Co CY iso e Z N � � ■ W Q � CLui b 7+ m iO+ W N LL i b� lO Y N O N M M M M M M M N N N W r � C�]ts�]w � pzrn � c �Z � pwp � n 0 0 O O N N CL O J N Q y s O > LO ZN W 1 CL LU NW N Id. /dd b I tijbbGG � � � adb � �d 2b� H lOD V 0 O W . V ON O Q� I� n n n t0 l0 lD l0 lD Q Ln C= ^i i ire Department Temecula Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month: January Reporting Year: 2017 Reporting 12, 73, 84, 92 Stations: PR and Public Education Programs: Total Number of EventsI Event Type Total Number of Hours Number of Public Contacts: for Reporting Month 0 School Event 0 0 0 Adult Education 0 0 0 Fair/Safety Expo 0 0 0 Display 0 0 5 Station Tour 5 268 0 Fire Safety Trailer 0 0 1 Other 2 15 Field Inspections: LE-100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of Initial Field Total Number of Inspections for Reporting 0 LE-100 Inspections for 0 Month Reporting Month Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Re-inspections for Reporting 0 Total Number of Fire Month Prevention Referrals for 3 Reporting Month Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc... Include photos if available. Engine 12 responded to 220 incidents in the month of January. Engine 73 and Truck 73 responded to 336 city and county emergency and non-emergency incidents for the month of January. Station 73 provided assistance to the following communities and cities: Murrieta, Lake Elsinore and Menifee.