Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParcel Map 30169 Drainage Report June 20060 DRAINAGE REPORT Parcel Map 30169 (Ynez Road) Temecula, California June, 2006 Prepared For: Vineyard Custom Homes LLC 0 Prepared By: SV Engineering Consultants 32605 Hwy. 79 South, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92592 (951)694-4824 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1 2.0 HYDROLOGY CRITERIA.............................................................................. 2 2.1 Hydrology Criteria...................................................................................... 2 2.2 Hydrology Methodology............................................................................. 2 2.3 Explanation of Civil Design Rational Method Software ............................ 3 3.0 PROJECT HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS........................................................... 4 4.0 HYDRAULIC CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY ........................................ 5 5.0 CONCLUSION................................................................................................... 5 APPENDICES • 1 RCFC&WCD Hydrologic Soils Group Map, Slope Intensity Curves, 100 -yr, 1 -hr Precipitation Maps 3 Rational Method Computer Output: Developed Conditions 100 -Year EXHIBITS A Developed Conditions Hydrology Map ii • 1.0 INTRODUCTION This drainage report has been prepared to quantify the proposed storm drainage run-off for Parcel Map 30169 and to provide sizing of drainage facilities required to convey the offsite/onsite run-on through the project site. The Project site is approximately 4.5 acres and is located in Temecula, California on the east side of Ynez Road, opposite Quite Meadow Road. This project proposes to construct 4 single family lots and a private roadway (cul-de-sac) to provide access to the lots. The offsite and onsite area that contributes to the analysis of this site is approximately 6.0 acres. The drainage basin is comprised of hillside undeveloped land with fair to poor ground cover. The proposed storm drain improvements consist of brow ditches, earthen swales, roadway, under sidewalk drain, and curb and gutter. The project site ultimately discharges onto Ynez Road. r1 U • 2.0 HYDROLOGY CRITERIA • This section of the report summarizes the hydrology criteria and key elements of the hydrologic methodology. 2.1 Hydrology Criteria Table 1 below presents a summary of the hydrology criteria used in the report. Table 1: Hydrology Criteria Storm drain improvements: 100 -year, 1 -hour storm. Land Use: Vacant Land (hillside) Runoff Coefficients: Per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual. Hydrologic Soil Group: Per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual. Intensity: Per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual. 2.2 Hydrology Methodology The Rational Method was used to determine the existing and proposed condition for the 100 -year 1 -hour storm flows for the design of the Project storm drain improvements. The 100 -year storm flow was used to size the storm drainpipes. The 1 -hour storm duration was used in the storm drainpipe design as it generally produces the higher more conservative peak flows. The Civil Design software package (Riverside Method) was used in the hydrologic analysis of the improvements. This includes: 1) Rational Method hydrology analysis. -2- . 2.3 Explanation of Civil Design Rational Method Software The Civil Design Rational Method was used to determine the 100 -year storm flow for the Project. The Rational Method Hydrology Program is a computer-aided design program where the user develops a node link model of the watershed. The program has the capability of estimating conduit sizes to convey design storm discharges, or the user may input specific conduit sizes and open channels. Soil types used in the model are based on hydrologic soil groups as outlined in the RCFC & WCD Hydrology Manual. The rainfall intensity distribution and runoff coefficients utilized by the program can be user-specified to be based on the RCFC & WCD Hydrology Manual. Developing independent node link models for each interior watershed and linking these sub -models together at confluence points creates the node link model. The program allows up to five streams to confluence at a node. Stream entries must be made sequentially until all are entered. The program allows consideration of only • one confluence at a time. The program has the capability of performing calculations for 11 hydrologic processes. These processes are assigned code numbers, which appear in the printed output. The code numbers and their meanings are as follows: CODE l: Initial subarea CODE 2: Street flow CODE 3: Addition of subarea CODE 4: Street inlet CODE 5: Natural Mountain/Valley CODE 6: Pipeflow (program estimated pipe size) CODE 7: Pipeflow (user specified pipe size) CODE 8: Improved channel CODE 9: Irregular channel CODE 10: User specified input data CODE 1 l : Confluence of current stream • CODE 12: Confluence of main stream -3- • 3.0 PROJECT HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS The existing drainage area is undeveloped with ground cover of native grass, and brush, with some areas that have been disked. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the amount of storm water runoff from the site onto Yenz road in its developed condition. The hydrologic soils group is D for the project site (Appendix 1). This project proposes to construct 4 single family lots and a private roadway (cul-de-sac) to provide access to the lots. The proposed storm drain improvements will include curb and gutter, brow ditches, and an under sidewalk drain. Runoffs from the Basins are as follows (Exhibit A): Basin `A': Basin `A' (nodes 100 — 140) flows overland to the south to a proposed brow ditch which flows west to Ynez Road. Basin `A's' elevations are from 1100 to 1051, • which is approximately 2.07 acre in area. This basin generates approximately 6.36 cfs in the 100 -year storm event. This basin discharges to Ynez Road through a proposed under n LJ sidewalk drain. Basin `B': Basin `B' (nodes 200 — 230) flows overland to the south to the proposed private access road which flows west to Ynez Road. Basin `B's' elevations are from 1104 to 1056.5, which is approximately 1.30 acre in area. This basin generates approximately 4.74 cfs in the 100 -year storm event. This basin discharges to Ynez Road via curb and gutter. Basin `C': Basin `C' (nodes 300 — 320) flows overland to the west from elevation 1080.5 to elevation 1055.5, which is approximately 2.66 acre in area. This basin generates approximately 9.27 cfs in the 100 -year storm event. This basin discharges to Ynez Road via curb and gutter. M • Below is a summary of the proposed 100 -year design discharges Basin Q cfs Structure `A' (node 100 - 140) 6.36 Brow Ditch / Under sidewalk drain `B' (node 200 - 230) 4.74 Curb and Gutter `C' (node 300 — 320) 9.27 Curb and Gutter 4.0 Onsite Brow Ditches The proposed onsite brow ditches are designed to convey 100 -year storm event which ultimately discharges to Ynez Road via an under sidewalk drain. Node Q (cfs) V (fps) Depth of Flow Structure 120-130 4.85 6.65 0.85 Brow Ditch, Std 304 (A) 130-140 6.36 7.35 0.93 Brow Ditch, Std 304 (A) (See Appendix under nodes 120-140 for calculations) 7.0 CONCLUSION This drainage report has been prepared to quantify the proposed storm drainage run-off for the development of Parcel Map 30169; which includes the construction of 4 single family residential lots. In the 100 -year storm event the project will discharge approximately 20 cfs onto Ynez Road which will convey the storm water south to an existing catch basin in Ynez Road. With the proper installation of the drainage devices and erosion control measures the storm water runoff from the site should not dramatically affect the downstream conditions. r1 U - 5 - 0 APPENDIX 0 0 RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP MAP, SLOPE INTENSITY CURVES, 100 -YR, 1 -HR PRECIPITATION MAPS 0 U u _u 4 Z LEGEND HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP MAP SOILS GROUP BOUNDARY FOR A SOILS GROUP DESIGNATION R C F C a W C D TEMECULA HYDROLOGY ]MANUAL n!66151� 0 FEET 5000 PLATE C-1.60 0 RATIONAL METHOD COMPUTER OUTPUT DEVELOPED CONDITIONS 100 -YEAR 0 • Riverside County Rational Hydrology Program CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering So£tware,(c) 1989 - 2004 Version 7.0 Rational Hydrology Study Date: 06/16/06 File:YnezlA.out ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PM 30169 (Ynez Road) Basin 'A' 100 -year Storm Event ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ********* Hydrology Study Control Information ********** English (in -lb) Units used in input data file ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rational Method Hydrology Program based on Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District 1978 hydrology manual Storm event (year) = 100.00 Antecedent Moisture Condition = 3 Standard intensity -duration curves data (Plate D-4.1) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 100.000 to Point/Station 110.000 **** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION **** For the [ Murrieta,Tmc,Rnch Callorco ] area used. Top (of initial area) elevation = 1100.000(Ft.) 10 year storm 10 minute intensity = 2.360(In/Hr) 10 year storm 60 minute intensity = 0.880(In/Hr) Slope = 0.07000 s(percent)= 7.00 100 year storm 10 minute intensity = 3.480(In/Hr) 100 year storm 60 minute intensity = 1.300(In/Hr) • UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Storm event year = 100.0 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Calculated rainfall intensity data: Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 1 hour intensity = 1.300(In/Hr) • Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 Slope of intensity duration curve = 0.5500 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 100.000 to Point/Station 110.000 **** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION **** Initial area flow distance = 100.000(Ft.) Top (of initial area) elevation = 1100.000(Ft.) Bottom (of initial area) elevation = 1093.000(Ft.) Difference in elevation = 7.000(Ft.) Slope = 0.07000 s(percent)= 7.00 TO = k(0.710)*[(length^3)/(elevation change)]^0.2 Initial area time of concentration = 7.625 min. Rainfall intensity = 4.043(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Runoff Coefficient = 0.880 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 • Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 93.40 • Pervious area fraction = 1.000; Impervious fraction = 0.000 Initial subarea runoff = 0.676(CFS) Total initial stream area = 0.190(Ac.) Pervious area fraction = 1.000 - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 110.000 to Point/Station 120.000 **** NATURAL CHANNEL TIME + SUBAREA FLOW ADDITION **** Top of natural channel elevation = 1093.000(Ft.) End of natural channel elevation = 1072.000(Ft.) Length of natural channel = 260.000(Ft.) Estimated mean flow rate at midpoint of channel Natural mountain channel type used L.A. County flood control district formula for channel velocity: Velocity = 5.48(q^.33)(slope^.492) Velocity using mean channel flow = 2.23(Ft/s) Correction to map slope used on extremely rugged channels with drops and waterfalls (Plate D-6.2) Normal channel slope = 0.0808 Corrected/adjusted channel slope = 0.0808 Travel time = 1.95 min. TC = 9.57 min. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 120.000 to Point/Station 130.000 **** IMPROVED CHANNEL TRAVEL TIME **** Upstream point elevation = 1072.000(Ft.) Downstream point elevation = 1067.000(Ft.) Channel length thru subarea = 225.000(Ft.) Channel base width = 0.000(Ft.) Slope or 'Z' of left channel bank = 1.000 Slope or 'Z' of right channel bank = 1.000 Estimated mean flow rate at midpoint of channel = 4.622(CFS) Manning's 'N' = 0.015 Maximum depth of channel = 1.000(Ft.) Flow(q) thru subarea = 4.622(CFS) • Depth of flow = 0.839(Ft.), Average velocity = 6.568(Ft/s) Channel flow top width = 1.678(Ft.) Adding area flow to channel • UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Runoff Coefficient = 0.877 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 93.40 Pervious area fraction = 1.000; Impervious fraction = 0.000 Rainfall intensity = 3.567(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Subarea runoff = 3.691(CFS) for 1.180(Ac.) Total runoff = 4.367(CFS) Total area = 1.370(Ac.) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 120.000 to Point/Station 130.000 **** IMPROVED CHANNEL TRAVEL TIME **** Upstream point elevation = 1072.000(Ft.) Downstream point elevation = 1067.000(Ft.) Channel length thru subarea = 225.000(Ft.) Channel base width = 0.000(Ft.) Slope or 'Z' of left channel bank = 1.000 Slope or 'Z' of right channel bank = 1.000 Estimated mean flow rate at midpoint of channel = 4.622(CFS) Manning's 'N' = 0.015 Maximum depth of channel = 1.000(Ft.) Flow(q) thru subarea = 4.622(CFS) • Depth of flow = 0.839(Ft.), Average velocity = 6.568(Ft/s) Channel flow top width = 1.678(Ft.) • Flow Velocity= 6.57(Ft/s) Travel time 0.57 min. Time of concentration = 10.14 min. Sub -Channel No. 1 Critical depth = 1.047(Ft.) ' Critical flow top width = 2.000(Ft.) ' Critical flow velocity= 4.226(Ft/s) ' Critical flow area = 1.094(Sq.Ft) Adding area flow to channel UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Runoff Coefficient = 0.876 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 93.40 Pervious area fraction = 1.000; Impervious fraction = 0.000 Rainfall intensity = 3.456(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Subarea runoff = 0.484(CFS) for 0.160(Ac.) Total runoff = 4.851(CFS) Total area = 1.530(Ac Depth of flow = 0.854(Ft.), Average velocity = 6.648(Ft/s) Sub -Channel No. 1 Critical depth = 1.070(Ft.) Critical flow top width = 2.000(Ft.) ' Critical flow velocity= 4.253(Ft/s) ' Critical flow area = 1.141(Sq.Ft) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 130.000 to Point/Station 140.000 **** IMPROVED CHANNEL TRAVEL TIME **** Upstream point elevation = 1067.000(Ft.) Downstream point elevation = 1051.000(Ft.) Channel length thru subarea = 660.000(Ft.) Channel base width = 0.000(Ft.) Slope or 'Z' of left channel bank = 1.000 Slope or 'Z' of right channel bank = 1.000 Estimated mean flow rate at midpoint of channel = Manning's 'N' = 0.015 Maximum depth of channel = 1.000(Ft.) Flow(q) thru subarea = 5.631(CFS) Depth of flow = 0.889(Ft.), Average velocity = Channel flow top width = 1.778(Ft.) Flow Velocity = 7.13(Ft/s) Travel time = 1.54 min. Time of concentration = 11.69 min. 5. 631 (CFS) 7.129(Ft/s) Sub -Channel No. 1 Critical depth = 1.125(Ft.) ' Critical flow top width = 2.000(Ft.) ' Critical flow velocity= 4.505(Ft/s) ' Critical flow area = 1.250(Sq.Ft) • Adding area flow to channel UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Runoff Coefficient = 0.874 • Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 93.40 Pervious area fraction = 1.000; Impervious fraction = 0.000 Rainfall intensity = 3.197(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Subarea runoff = 1.509(CFS) for 0.540(Ac.) Total runoff = 6.360(CFS) Total area = 2.070(Ac Depth of flow = 0.930(Ft.), Average velocity = 7.350(Ft/s) Sub -Channel No. 1 Critical depth = 1.180(Ft.) ' Critical flow top width = 2.000(Ft.) ' Critical flow velocity= 4.679(Ft/s) ' Critical flow area = 1.359(Sq.Ft) End of computations, total study area = 2.07 (Ac.) The following figures may be used for a unit hydrograph study of the same area. Area averaged pervious area fraction(Ap) = 1.000 Area averaged RI index number = 84.0 • • Riverside County Rational Hydrology Program CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering So£tware,(c) 1989 - 2004 Version 7.0 Rational Hydrology Study Date: 06/16/06 File:YnezlB.out ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PM 30169 (Ynez Road) Basin 'B' 100 -year Storm Event ---------------------------------------------------------- ********* Hydrology Study Control Information ********** English (in -16) Units used in input data file Rational Method Hydrology Program based on Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District 1978 hydrology manual Storm event (year) = 100.00 Antecedent Moisture Condition = 3 Standard intensity -duration curves data (Plate D-4.1) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 200.000 to Point/Station 210.000 **** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION **** For the [ Murrieta,Tmc,Rnch Callorco ] area used. Top (of initial area) elevation = 1104.000(Ft.) 10 year storm 10 minute intensity = 2.360(In/Hr) 10 year storm 60 minute intensity = 0.880(In/Hr) Slope = 0.14000 s(percent)= 14.00 100 year storm 10 minute intensity = 3.480(In/Hr) 100 year storm 60 minute intensity = 1.300(In/Hr) • UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Storm event year = 100.0 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Calculated rainfall intensity data: Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 1 hour intensity = 1.300(In/Hr) • Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 Slope of intensity duration curve = 0.5500 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 200.000 to Point/Station 210.000 **** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION **** Initial area flow distance = 100.000(Ft.) Top (of initial area) elevation = 1104.000(Ft.) Bottom (of initial area) elevation = 1090.000(Ft.) Difference in elevation = 14.000(Ft.) Slope = 0.14000 s(percent)= 14.00 TC = k(0.710)*[(length^3)/(elevation change)]^0.2 Initial area time of concentration = 6.638 min. Rainfall intensity = 4.363(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Runoff Coefficient = 0.881 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 • Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 93.40 • Pervious area fraction = 1.000; Impervious fraction = 0.000 Initial subarea runoff = 0.884(CFS) Total initial stream area = 0.230(Ac.) Pervious area fraction = 1.000 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 210.000 to Point/Station 220.000 **** NATURAL CHANNEL TIME + SUBAREA FLOW ADDITION **** Top of natural channel elevation = 1090.000(Ft.) End of natural channel elevation = 1075.400(Ft.) Length of natural channel = 70.000(Ft.) Estimated mean flow rate at midpoint of channel = 2.326(CFS) Natural mountain channel type used L.A. County flood control district formula for channel velocity: Velocity = 5.48(q^.33)(slope^.492) Velocity using mean channel flow = 3.35(Ft/s) Correction to map slope used on extremely rugged channels with drops and waterfalls (Plate D-6.2) Normal channel slope = 0.2086 Corrected/adjusted channel slope = 0.2086 Travel time = 0.35 min. TC = 6.99 min. Top of street segment elevation = 1075.400(Ft.) End of street segment elevation = 1056.500(Ft.) Length of street segment = 420.000(Ft.) Height of curb above gutter flowline = 4.0(In.) Width of half street (curb to crown) = 16.000(Ft.) Distance from crown to crossfall grade break = 14.000(Ft Slope from gutter to grade break (v/hz) = 0.020 Slope from grade break to crown (v/hz) = 0.020 Street flow is on [1] side(s) of the street Distance from curb to property line = 9.000(Ft.) • Slope from curb to property line (v/hz) = 0.020 Gutter width = 2.000(Ft.) Adding area flow to channel • UNDEVELOPED (fair cover) subarea Runoff Coefficient = 0.880 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 93.40 Pervious area fraction = 1.000; Impervious fraction = 0.000 Rainfall intensity = 4.242(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Subarea runoff = 2.801(CFS) for 0.750(Ac.) Total runoff = 3.685(CFS) Total area = 0.980(Ac.) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 220.000 to Point/Station 230.000 **** STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME + SUBAREA FLOW ADDITION **** Top of street segment elevation = 1075.400(Ft.) End of street segment elevation = 1056.500(Ft.) Length of street segment = 420.000(Ft.) Height of curb above gutter flowline = 4.0(In.) Width of half street (curb to crown) = 16.000(Ft.) Distance from crown to crossfall grade break = 14.000(Ft Slope from gutter to grade break (v/hz) = 0.020 Slope from grade break to crown (v/hz) = 0.020 Street flow is on [1] side(s) of the street Distance from curb to property line = 9.000(Ft.) • Slope from curb to property line (v/hz) = 0.020 Gutter width = 2.000(Ft.) Area averaged pervious area fraction(Ap) = 0.951 Area averaged RI index number = 81.8 Gutter hike from flowline = 1.000(In.) • Manning's N in gutter = 0.0150 Manning's N from gutter to grade break = 0.0150 Manning's N from grade break to crown = 0.0150 Estimated mean flow rate at midpoint of street = 4.249(CFS) Depth of flow = 0.234(Ft.), Average velocity = 4.453(Ft/s) Streetflow hydraulics at midpoint of street travel: Halfstreet flow width = 9.544(Ft.) Flow velocity = 4.45(Ft/s) Travel time = 1.57 min. TC = 8.56 min. Adding area flow to street SINGLE FAMILY (1 Acre Lot) Runoff Coefficient = 0.867 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 88.00 Pervious area fraction = 0.800; Impervious fraction = 0.200 Rainfall intensity = 3.794(ln/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Subarea runoff = 1.053(CFS) for 0.320(Ac.) Total runoff = 4.738(CFS) Total area = 1.300(Ac. Street flow at end of street = 4.738(CFS) Half street flow at end of street = 4.738(CFS) Depth of flow = 0.243(Ft.), Average velocity = 4.572(Ft/s) Flow width (from curb towards crown)= 9.964(Ft.) End of computations, total study area = 1.30 (Ac.) The following figures may • be used for a unit hydrograph study of the same area. Area averaged pervious area fraction(Ap) = 0.951 Area averaged RI index number = 81.8 • Riverside County Rational Hydrology Program CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software,(c) 1989 - 2004 Version 7.0 Rational Hydrology Study Date: 06/16/06 File:YnezlC.out ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PM 30169 (Ynez Road) Basin 'C' 100 -year Storm Event ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ********* Hydrology Study Control Information ********** English (in -1b) Units used in input data file --------------------------------------------------------------------- Rational Method Hydrology Program based on Riverside County Flood Control s Water Conservation District 1978 hydrology manual Storm event (year) = 100.00 Antecedent Moisture Condition = 3 Standard intensity -duration curves data (Plate D-4.1) For the [ Murrieta,Tmc,Rnch Callorco ] area used. 10 year storm 10 minute intensity = 2.360(In/Hr) 10 year storm 60 minute intensity = 0.880(In/Hr) 100 year storm 10 minute intensity = 3.480(In/Hr) • 100 year storm 60 minute intensity = 1.300(In/Hr) Storm event year = 100.0 Calculated rainfall intensity data: 1 hour intensity = 1.300(In/Hr) Slope of intensity duration curve = 0.5500 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 300.000 to Point/Station 310.000 **** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION **** Initial area flow distance = 140.000(Ft.) Top (of initial area) elevation = 1080.500(Ft.) Bottom (of initial area) elevation = 1072.000(Ft.) Difference in elevation = 8.500(Ft.) Slope = 0.06071 s(percent)= 6.07 TC = k(0.480)*[(length^3)/(elevation change)]^0.2 Initial area time of concentration = 6.068 min. Rainfall intensity = 4.584(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm SINGLE FAMILY (1 Acre Lot) Runoff Coefficient = 0.873 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 • Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 • RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 88.00 Pervious area fraction = 0.800; Impervious fraction = 0.200 Initial subarea runoff = 2.360(CFS) Total initial stream area = 0.590(Ac.) Pervious area fraction = 0.800 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Process from Point/Station 310.000 to Point/Station 320.000 **** STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME + SUBAREA FLOW ADDITION **** Top of street segment elevation = 1072.000(Ft.) End of street segment elevation = 1055.500(Ft.) Length of street segment = 560.000(Ft.) Height of curb above gutter flowline = 4.0(In.) Width of half street (curb to crown) = 16.000(Ft.) Distance from crown to crossfall grade break = 14.000(Ft.) Slope from gutter to grade break (v/hz) = 0.020 Slope from grade break to crown (v/hz) = 0.020 Street flow is on [1] side(s) of the street Distance from curb to property line = 9.000(Ft.) Slope from curb to property line (v/hz) = 0.020 Gutter width = 2.000(Ft.) Gutter hike from flowline = 1.000(In.) Manning's N in gutter = 0.0150 Manning's N from gutter to grade break = 0.0150 Manning's N from grade break to crown = 0.0150 Estimated mean flow rate at midpoint of street = 5.860(CFS) • Depth of flow = 0.279(Ft.), Average velocity = 4.1.03(Ft/s) Streetflow hydraulics at midpoint of street travel: Halfstreet flow width = 11.768(Ft.) Flow velocity = 4.10(Ft/s) Travel time = 2.27 min. TC = 8.34 min. Adding area flow to street SINGLE FAMILY (1 Acre Lot) Runoff Coefficient = 0.868 Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000 Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000 RI index for soil(AMC 3) = 88.00 Pervious area fraction = 0.800; Impervious fraction = 0.200 Rainfall intensity = 3.848(In/Hr) for a 100.0 year storm Subarea runoff = 6.910(CFS) for 2.070(Ac.) Total runoff = 9.270(CFS) Total area = 2.660(Ac.) Street flow at end of street = 9.270(CFS) Half street flow at end of street = 9.270(CFS) Depth of flow = 0.324(Ft.), Average velocity = 4.592(Ft/s) Flow width (from curb towards crown)= 14.054(Ft.) End of computations, total study area = 2.66 (Ac.) The following figures may be used for a unit hydrograph study of the same area. Area averaged pervious area fraction(Ap) = 0.800 Area averaged RI index number = 75.0 • C� EXHIBITS LJ