Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
101894 CC Agenda
AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD OCTOBER 18, 1994- 7:00 PM In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909l 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35. 102.35. 104ADA Title II] At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Pastor Ron Bolt, People's Church of the Valley Councilmember Parks Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts Red Ribbon Week Proclamation Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-32 Resolution: No. 94-102 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Resolution ADDrovinQ List Of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Report as of AuQust 31, 1994 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1994. 4 5 6 7 Utility Easements for Pale Community Park, Project No. PW93-03 CSD RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the Rancho California Water District easement for water service to the Pale Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. 4.2 Approve the Southern California Edison easement for electrical service to the Pale Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. Contract Amendment No. 8 to Community Facilities District 88-12 EnQineerina Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the I-15/Rancho California Road InterchanQe Modifications RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 8 to provide additional engineering services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the t-15/Rancho California Road Interchange modification in an amount not to exceed ~107,000.00. Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval Of the Plans and Specifications for the Traffic Sianal at Maraarita Road and Avenida Barca (Project No, PW93-I0) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW93-10, Traffic Signal at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca. Award of Construction Contract for Proiect No. PW94-12 FY 94-95 Slurry Seal Proiect RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Award a contract for Project No. PW94-12 FY 94-95 Slurry Seal Project, to Roy · Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. for $179,940.89and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 7.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of ~17,994.09which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 8 Award of Construction Contract for Project NO, PW94-13 FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Proqram 9 10 11 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Award a contract for Project No. PW94-13 FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program, to Hillcrest Contracting, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $52,307.85. 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,230.78 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Establishment of Fee for Newsrack Installation Encroachment Permit RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR APPLICATION FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NEWSRACK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY Pala Park Reimbursement Aoreement RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 ApprOve and authorize the Mayor to sign the "Temecula Lane and Pala Channel Reimbursement Agreement. Substitute Subdivision Improvement Aclreement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract 21067 (Continued from the meeting of 10/11/94) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Accept Substitute Subdivision improvement Agreement and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 21067; 11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. 12 Sanitary Sewer - Solana Way/t-15 Crossina RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement authorizing Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) to proceed with design and construction of Solana Way/l-15 Sewer Pipeline Crossing. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 13 14 Ordinance No. 94-29 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-29 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5589, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) AND A-2-20 (HEAVY AGRICULTURE, 20 ACRE MINIMUM) TO SP (SPECIFIC PLAN) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD Ordinance No. 94-30 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-30 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 263 (REGIONAL CENTER) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD 15 Ordinance No. 94-31 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-31 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND COSCAN HOMES CALIFORNIA, INC., DBA COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES, FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164- RORIPAUGH, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0017 COUNCIL BUSINESS 16 Walcott Corridor Improvements, ProieCt No. PW94-10, Rancho California Water District Fundine Reouest (Continued from the meeting of 10/11/94) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Deny the request by Rancho California Water District to use City funds to relocate · an existing waterline within existing street right-of-way. 17 Traffic Sic!nalization Report RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Review the report and address any questions to staff. 18 "No Parkina" on Palma Drive and Valleio Avenue across from the Rancho Community Church RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Reject the request to create a "No Parking'" zone on the west side of Palma Drive and the north side of Vallejo Avenue across from the Rancho Community Church. 19 Pro and Con Presentations on Prooositions 186 and 187 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Allow the invited speakers, both pro and con, to address Propositions 186 and 187 before the City Council. 20 21 Contract Award - Preparation of Santa Maraarita Watershed PLans - Districts I and III RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Oppose the award of contract and authorize the Mayor to forward a letter to the District Board of Directors of Regional Parks and Open Space. Discussion of Borell Airport Industrial Park Traffic and Circulation Concerns (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Mu~oz) DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: November 15, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - {To be held at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting November 15, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are calted to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. AGENCY BUSINESS Authorization of Aclreement for Financial Advisory Services for the Old Town Entertainment Center Proiect RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the terms of the Agreement for Financial Advisory Services with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates and authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of the Agreement. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: Temecula, California. November 15, 1994, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, tobacco, alcohol and other drug use and abuse has reached epidemic stages in California and throughout the United States; and WHEREAS, it is imperative that community members launch unified and visible tobacco, alcohol, and other drug prevention education pwgrams and activities to eliminate the demand for these substances; and WHEREAS, Californians for Drug-Free Youth, Inc. (CADFY), coordinates the California Red Ribbon Celebration in cooperation with National Family Partnership to offer our citizens the opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to healthy, drug-free lifestyles; and WHEREAS, President Clinton is the National Honorary Chairman and Governor Wilson and Mrs. Gayle Wilson are the State Honorary Chairpersons to provide national and state focus on a Drug-Free America; and WHEREAS, parents, youth, government, business, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service organizations, social services, health services, media and the general public will demonstrate their commitment to drug-free communities by wearing and displaying Red Ribbons during this week-long celebration; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald H. Roberrs, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of October 23-31, 1994 to be "RED RIBBON WEEK" and encourage all citizens to participate in tobacco, alcohol and other drug prevention programs and activities, making a visible statement and commitment to a healthy, drug-free community. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 18th day of October, 1994. Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH'E CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN F_~'HIRIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TENIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $594,756.32. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 18th day of October, 1994. ATFEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] Resos 41 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 18th day of June, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILM'F-MBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk R=aos 41 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 10/06/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10/18/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 132,655.41 326,999.65 10/06/94 TOTAL PAYROLL: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 10/18/94 COUNCIL MEETING: 135,101.26 $ 594,756.32 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPFFAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 220 MARGARiTA ROAD REIMB. DIST, 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 RDA-CIP 300 SELF-INSURANCE 310 VEHICLES 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES 380 BDA-DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: O01 GENERAL 1 O0 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERV~CE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA-CIP 300 SELF-INSURANCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: LD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER (~ 368,937.45 20,204.51 0.00 0.00 452.52 23,948.50 4,189.53 0.00 13,290.53 0.00 9,766.58 0.00 1,320.14 837.42 411.13 0.00 4,943.23 5,918.60 5,434.92 0.00 0,00 $ 459,655.06 91,785.13 14,452.26 577.20 20,865.59 439.54 0.00 1,768.12 726.27 593.74 1,308.25 695.87 1,909.29 135,101.26 $ 594,756.32 ,' HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT , HEREBY CERT1FY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VQUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA p~cc 10 10/06/94 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FO~ ALL PERIOOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOt4/NO0 SET ASIDE 190 CORNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C[P 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORHATION SYSTENS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL ANOUNT 61,336.42 11,514.34 452.52 Z3,370.58 4,189.53 9,205.53 9,766.58 579.39 411.13 2,733.23 3,661.24 5,434.92 132,655.41 V~E2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 1 14 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20427 10/03/94 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES REG. FOR JG ANNUAL CONF. 10/23 001-120-999-5258 195.00 195.00 319889 09/29/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) MANUAL TAXES FOR SEPT 190-2070 319889 09/29/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) MANUAL TAXES FOR SEPT 001-2070 25.54 562.46 588.00 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 10,818.49 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 2,206.75 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 103.25 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 2,66837 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 46.88 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 213.16 544540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 48.97 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 87.98 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 279.83 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 92.63 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 137.12 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 3,277.02 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070 526.99 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 165-2070 20.88 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEOICARE 190-2070 729.24 34~40 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED[CARE 191-2070 17.44 ~ 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 193-2070 63.98 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED[CARE 280-2070 18.12 34~40 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 22.43 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 58.36 344540 10/06/94 000283 FiRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 23.52 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 63.32 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) SEPT. TAXES 190-2070 25.54- 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) SEPT TAXES 001-2070 562.46- 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 555.65 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOI 100-2070 134.74 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 , 229.58 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 191-2070 7.82 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/+4 SDI 193-2070 28.68 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 4.62 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 300-2070 3.58 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 10.54 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 24.65 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 2,878.80 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 100-2070 555.39 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 22.08 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 544.47 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 15.40 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 44.95 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 9.98 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000.~J+4 STATE 300-2070 30.04 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 64.13 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ STATE 330-2070 17.05 3' '~ 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/+4 STATE 340-2070 15.15 20,936.7~ 5,197.30 VOUCBRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA pAr, i,, 2 10/06/94 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIORS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 20434 10/06/94 001625 A B C - A BETTER CONFER ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT CONFERENCE DAWES V. RDA 9/13/9 280-199-999-5246 31,06 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 414.16 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 100-~10 91.18 204]5 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 6.68 20455 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2~10 62.65 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 191-2310 4.39 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 5.36 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 3.34 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-2310 2.44 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 16.70 20435 10/06/94 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP COBR 001-1180 9.75 20436 10/06/94 000495 ACT 1 PERSONNEL SERVICE 20439 10/06/94 000558 ADVANCED MOBILECONM 20440 10/06/94 001623 ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTRO 20441 10/06/94 000101 APPLE ONE 20441 10/06/94 000101 APPLE ONE 20442 10/06/94 001323 ARRONHEAD WATER 20442 10/06/94 001323 ARRONHE~a3 WATER 20445 10/06/94 000838 BIG A AUTO PARTS 20443 10/06/94 000838 BIG A AUTO PARTS 20443 10/06/94 000838 BIG A AUTO PARTS 20445 10/06/94 000838 BIG A AUTO PARTS 20443 10/06/94 000838 BIG A AUTO PARTS 20443 10/06/94 000838 BIG A AUTO PARTS 20444 10/06/94 000370 BIRDSALL, PATRICIA 20445 10/06/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB 20446 10/06/94 001073 BUTTERWORTH 20447 10/06/94 001627 CALIFORNIA CPA 20448 10/06/94 000984 CALIFORNIA MAIN STREET 20449 10/06/94 000699 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICE 20450 10/06/94 000475 CALIFORNIA REDEVEL(~oMEN TEMP HELP W/E 9/10 & 9/17 001'161-999-5118 MOBILE COVERAGE FOR OCTOBER 94 320-199-999-5209 BEVERAGE PERMIT FOR 11/9/94 001-100-999-5258 TEMP HELP W/E 09/10/94 TEMP HELP W/E 09/10/94 001-140o999-5118 190-180-999-5118 ACCT 00149414~ 8/31-9/15/94 100-164-601-5240 ACCT 00147';14420 8/31-9/15/94 340-199-999-5240 CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEMS TAX NISC AUTO PARTS TAX OIL FILTER TAX 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-170o999-5215 LEAGUE OF CC SEPT 8-9,1994 001-100-9~9-5258 DONATION FROM GOLF TOURNAMENT 001-2172 ADA CUMPLIANCE MANUAL FOR EMPL 001-150-999-5228 CPE COURSE 12/8 GENIE ROBERTS 001-140-999-5261 WORKSHOP 10/18/94-D. HOGAN 001-161-999-5258 TRAINING CLASS 10/12/94 001-170-999-5261 REDEVELOP SEMINAR 9/22/94 001-161-999-5258 INFOR FOR RDA LOANS FRON STATE 280-199-999-5250 20451 10/06/94 001062 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 300.25 738.00 25.00 406.35 108.36 16.50 128.86 9.21- .71- 99.58 7.72 4.96 .38 4.00 1,000.00 46.71 249.00 50.00 160.00 145.00 150.00 31,06 616.65 500.25 7~8.00 25.00 514.71 14>.56 102.72 4.00 1,000.00 46.71 249.00 30.00 160.00 145.00 150.00 20452 10/06/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE HEAR(T/71467CIT) 001-161-999-5256 ]4.85 20452 10/06/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE HEAR(7771467CIT) 001-120-999-5256 ]4.85 20452 10/06/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN * LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE HEAR(7771989*CI) 001-120-999-5256 31.75 V~"E2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 3 I 4 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME [TEN ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 20452 10/06/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20452 10106/94 000127 CALIFORN%AN 20452 10/06/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20452 10/06/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20452 10/06/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN 20452 10106/94 000127 CALIFORNIAN LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE HEAR(7771~67*CI) 001-161-999-5256 LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE HEAR(7771989wCl) 001-120-999-5256 LEGAL PUBLIC HEAR NOTICE(T776400*CI) 001-161-999-5256 LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE NEAR(T771989wCI) 001-161-999-5256 LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE HEAR(7771989*CI) 001-120-999-5256 LEGAL PUBLIC NOTICE HEAR(T771467*CI) 001-120-991-5256 35.62 9.29 37.95 37.17 31.75 61.18 314.41 20453 10/06/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER HARDWARE FOR SIGN INSTALL., I00-164-601-5244 20453 10/06/94 000135 CENTP~L CITIES SIGN SER TAX 100-164-601-5244 20453 10/06/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER HARDWARE FOR SIGN INSTALL.# 100-164-601-5244 20453 10/06/94 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER T~ 100-164-601-5244 57.60 4.46 147.50 11.43 220.99 20454 10/06/94 001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE CHOCO CITY SEAL FOR SISTER CIT 001-100-999-5258 20454 10/06/94 001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE CANDY MOLD OF CITY SEAL 001-100-999-5258 168.00 75.00 243.00 20455 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 001-2330 39.75 20455 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 600 A&S 190-2~30 39.75 20455 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001o2~30 193.66 20455 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 100-2330 12.94 20455 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330 83.64 20/,55 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 191-2330 14.35 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 193-2330 17.53 10/06/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330 5.18 406.80 20456 10/06/94 001275 CONPUSERV, INC. USAGE CHARGE FOR SEPT 94 320-199-999-5228 13.75 13.75 20457 10/06/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO VEHICLE MAINT. PUBLIC ~ORKS 100-164-604-5214 20457 10/06/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO VEHICLE MAINT. PUBLIC WORKS 001-163-999-5214 20457 10/06/94 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO VEHICLE MAINT. PUBLIC WORKS 001-163-999-5214 419.63 86.01 12,50 518.14 20458 10/06194 000155 DAVLIN TAPING OF COUNCIL MEET 9/27194 001-100-999-5250 20458 10/06/94 000155 DAVLIN COPY OF RDA MEETING TAPE 280-199-95x~-5250 20459 10/06/94 000518 DEL RiO CARE ANIMAL HOS MEDICAL CARE FOR POLICE DOG 001-170-999-5327 696.23 21.55 31.25 717.78 31.25 20460 10/06/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DEN-AMIN O01-22d, O 15.00 20460 10/06/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENT-ADV 001-1180 7.84 20460 10/06/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340 7.84 30.6e 20461 10/06/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE PLANTING-THE SUMMIT/SANTIAGO 193-180-999-5415 20461 10/06/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE PLANT REPLACEMENT 193-180-999-5415 20461 10/06/94 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE REPLANTING ~50 WOOOCREST 193-180-999-5415 20462 10/06/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE 280-199-999-5230 20463 10/06/94 000170 FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY BINDER REFILLS AND SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 20463 10/06/94 000170 FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN CALENDARS FOR 94-95 001-161-999-5220 20464 10/06/94 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-1997 GEN 320-199-999-5208 ~ 10/06/94 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-0128 GEN 320-199-999-5208 10/06/94 '000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-6297 GEN 320-199-999-5208 720.00 175.00 170.00 9.50 83.33 74.08 178.39 601.61 16.99 1,065.00 9.50 157.41 796.99 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 10/06/94 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERlOGS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20465 20465 20466 20466 20466 20466 20466 20466 20467 20467 20467 20467 20467 20467 20467 20467 20467 20467 20468 20469 20470 20470 20471 20472 20472 20472 20472 20472 20472 20472 20472 20473 20474 20475 20476 20477 20477 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/06/94 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD 10/06/94 001164 GABRIEL# RICHARD 10/06/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROGUCT 10/06/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRDOUCT 10/06/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRQOUCT 10/06/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 10/06/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 10/06/94 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GRCXJP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP MqERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP N4ERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000430 GROUP AMERICA VOLUNTA 000378 HAFELI, THOMAS 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 001556 HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 001556 HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 000806 HOWARD, BOBBY 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 001407 INTER VALLEY POUL SUPPL 001606 JEANPLONG, JOHN 001529 JOCHUM, LORI 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, KOVAC, JOHN KOVAC, JOHN ITEM DESCRIPTION OCTOBER 94 RENT OCTOBER 94 RENT OFFICE SUPPLIES PLAQUES & MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES NIBC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 000430 VL N)VAN 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VL REVER 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000450 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE DISASTOR CORT PLAN & RECOVERY REPAIR AND HAINT ITEMS 1-4x4 TRAILER FOR WALN BEHIND TAX PNT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF CORP 000194 DEF COHP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 OEF CONP 000194 DEF COMP MISC POOL SUPPLIES CLEAN & REMOVE ALGAE FROM POOL PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR COPY CENTER VARIOUS SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5234 100-164-601-5234 001-110-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-161-999-5220 001-2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 340-2510 001-2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 340-2510 320-199-999-5258 340-199-999-5212 100-164-601-5610 100-164-601-5610 190-183-999-5330 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 193-2080 280-2080 300-2080 340-2080 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-183-999-5330 330-199-999-5220 OVER CHARGE ON VALUATION PERMI 001-2290 OVER CHARGE ON VALUATION PERMI 001-162-4285 ITEM AMOUNT 280.00 420.00 74.51 541.98 77.07 127.05 53.66 472.69 222.15 161.87 15.78 44.09 194.55- 134.27 15.78 44.09 .41 161.08 26.05 165.95 12.86 400.00 1,461.99 248.63 470.68 74.52 91.09 44.03 37.49 15.90 96.11 100.00 86.40 42.88 .07 ~.00 CHECK AMOJNT 700.00 1,346.96 444.30 26.03 178.81 400.00 2,444.33 96.11 100.00 86.40 42.88 66.O7 20478 10/06/94 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES CONFERENCE 11/10/94 001-140-999-5258 95.00 VOUcu~E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 5 1 ~ 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[(30S VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 20478 10/06/94 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES CONFERENCE 11/10/94 001-170-999-5261 95.00 190.00 20479 10/06/94 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER MAINT FOR VEHICLES 001-162-999-5214 94.02 94.02 20480 10/06/94 000653 LUCKY STORE SUPPLIES-COOKIE MONSTER CLASS 190-183-999-5320 50.00 50.00 20481 10/06/94 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. NEIGHBORHCX30 gATCH NEWSLETTER 001-170-999-5222 20481 10/06/94 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. TAX 001-170-999-5222 66.55 5.16 71.71 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER I00-164-60t-5238 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER 001-163-999-5250 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER 001-165-999-5218 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER 001-100-999-5250 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER 190-180-999-5250 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER 001~170-999-5242 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER 001-162-999-5238 20482 10/06/94 001561 PAGENET PAGER SERVICE CHARGE OCTOBER 320-199-999-5238 12.53 15.00 7.50 22.50 75.49 22.50 22.50 19.95 197.97 20483 10/06/94 001243 PALNQUIST, MARY PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5530 367.20 367.20 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 43.06 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 12,462.68 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 100'2390 2,269.50 2U~t~4 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165'2390 108.84 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 2,685.75 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 87.49 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193'2390 316.44 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280'2390 61.17 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 500-2390 106.84 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-2390 268.21 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 330-2390 114.60 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 294.79 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 57.95 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 10.78 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESI RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 .37 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESI RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190'2390 13.44 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191'2390 .42 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193'2390 1.44 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 .19 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 .46 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 .93 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 .93 20484 10/06/94 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 2.00 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 001'2090 1,162.62 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 100-2090 39.81 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH %NSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 001-2090 688.17 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 C[GNA 001-2090 857.37 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 100-2090 176.06 ~ 10/06/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 193-2090 306.20 10/06/94 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 300-2090 38.27 18,908.28 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PA~ 6 10/06/94 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000Z45 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20405 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20405 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20405 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20405 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20405 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20405 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS 20485 10/06/94 000245 PERS ITEM DESCRIPTION HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH IRSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 KAISERSO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PC HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS CHO HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS CHO HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS CHO HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS DED HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS-ADN HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 TAKECARE HEALTH [NSUR, PRE 000245 TAKECARE HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 TAKECARE HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH |NSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR HEALTH IRSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PC HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE HEALTH |NSUR. PRE 000245 TAKECARE 20486 10106/94 000248 PETROLANE 20486 10/06/94 000248 PETROLANE 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH PROPANE EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB, PETTY CASH REIMB, PETTY CASH REIM8, PETTY CASH REIMB, ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2090 100-2090 165-2090 190-2090 191-2090 193-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 280-2090 300-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 165-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 100-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 280-2090 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 190-181-999-5301 001-140-999-5260 001-140-999-5258 190-180-999-5301 320-199-999-5208 100-164-604-5220 001-161-999-5260 ITEM AMOUNT 4,089.64 978.61 163.67 1,774.81 143.57 175.39 318.96 413.44 810.66 347.42 899.32 71.12 1,055.23 410.10 ?33.20 521.82 1,981.67 9.94 4.47 802.51 104.95 1,416.10 841.02 79.97 40.76 101.31 52.02 184.45 3.79 2.19 202.76 1.22 12.41 7.96 112.19 31.92 747.Z3- 23.45 6,74 4.82 264.39 155.17 113.93 15.50 14.00 24.00 1.00 14.68 27.00 CHECK ANOUNT 21,456.85 419.56 V~E2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 14 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB, 190-183-999-53Z0 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 300-199-999-5207 20487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-162-9q9-5263 Z0487 10/06/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 280-1990 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPH 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20488 10/06/94 001537 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE 001537 DENTALPM 20493 10/06/94 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY 20494 10/06/94 000992 RAMONA TIRE, INC. 20J~95 10/06/94 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C , 10/06/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20496 10/06/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20496 10/06/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20496 10/06/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 20497 10/06/94 20497 10/06/94 RANCHO VALLEY ELECTRIC RARCHO VALLEY ELECTRIC RIVERS[DE CO. CLERK OF ROBERT BEIN, ~M FROST & ROBERTS, GENIE ROWLEY, CATHERINE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY S SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA SMART & FINAL SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CUMP LOCKSMITH SERVICES MAINT ON TCSD VEHICLE BLUEPRINT REPROUUCTIOR 02-79-10100-1 08/03-09/01/94 SERVICE 07/21/94-08/23/94 SERVICE 07/21/94-08/23/94 INSTALL 2" gATER METER & CAP OVER CHARGE ON VALUATION PERMI OVER CHARGE ON VALUATION PERMI 001-2340 100-Z340 165-2340 190-2340 191-2340 193-2340 280-2340 300-2340 330-2340 340-2340 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5214 210-165-638-5804 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 t93-180-999-5240 210-190-136-5802 20498 10/06/94 001169 20499 10/06/94 000271 20500 10/06/94 001624 20501 10/06/94 000815 20502 10/06/94 001622 20503 10/06/94 000403 20504 10/06/94 000645 20505 10/06/94 00053? 20505 10/06/94 000537 20505 10/06/94 000537 20505 10/06/94 000537 20505 10/06/94 00053? 10/06/94 001212 001-162-4200 001-162-4285 RECORDING EASEMNT TRCT 27827-1 001-1990 7 LOCATION MAp EXHIBITS 001-140-999-5248 BOND SALE SEMINAR 9/8-9 001-140-999-5258 PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5330 RENTAL BIKE FOR TRAINING 001-170-999-5261 POOL MAINT FOR SEPT 94 190-180-999-5212 RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5301 66-77-584-8087-02 8/22-9/22/94 00-00-700-9656-01 8/26-9/26/94 001-00-700-9657-01 8/26-9/26/9 00-00-700-9658-01 8/26-9/26/94 00-00-700-9659-01 8/26-9/26/94 17-8274-036-1451-18/23-9/22/9 340-199-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 340-199-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 ITEM AMOUNT 17.82 8.00 5.00 73.24 1,241.92 295.42 17.16 197.69 7.32 8.94 8.58 10.72 42.90 49.33 51.11 151.52 77.58 51.32 2,477.82 6,330.45 9,689.00 42.75 57.00 11.00 600.00 114.32 230.60 300.OO 90.00 119.63 58.89 3,761.61 4,034.83 4,225,33 508.24 18.26 CHECK AMOUNT 314.17 1,879.98 51.11 151.52 77.58 18,548.59 99.75 11.00 600. O0 114.32 230.40 300.00 90. O0 119.63 12,588.90 18.26 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAc.r~8 10/06/94 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NLR4BER NAME 20507 10/06/94 001611 STEEL GRIP SYSTEMS, iNC 20507 10/06/94 001611 STEEL GRiP SYSTEMS, INC 20507 10/06/94 001611 STEEL GRiP SYSTEMS, iNC ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT CONCRETE-ADHESIVE/MORIFIER FREIGHT TAX 100-16~-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-16~-601-5218 409.50 13.26 31.74 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 457.87 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN OURS 100-2125 55.51 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 165-2125 7.40 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 85.10 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 191-2125 8.32 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 28.68 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 300-2125 4.62 20508 10/06/94 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UR DUES 320-2125 18.50 20509 10/06/94 000825 TEMECULA CYCLES MAINT FOR CiTY MOTORCYCLES 001-170-999-5214 APPRECIATION TROPHY FOR TS 001-150-999-5265 PLAQUE FOR ARTIFACT FOUND AT G 001-100-999-5258 SPORTS PROGRAMS TROPHYS 190-183-999-5380 TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301 20510 10/06/94 000507 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 20510 10/06/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY C0. 20510 10/06/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 20510 10/06/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. 83.99 63.29 53.83 262.91 16.17 20511 10/06/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEX BENEFIT REIMB. 001-1020 3,597.39 20511 10/06/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEX BENEFIT REIMB. 190-1020 506.66 20511 10/06/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEX BENEFIT REIMB. 100-1020 30.25 20511 10/06/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEX BENEFIT REINB. 300-1020 12.50 20511 10/06/94 000642 TEMECULA, CITY OF - FLE FLEX BENEFIT REIMB. 330-1020 11.11 OVER CHARGE ON PC~4ER POLE PERM 001-162'4285 20512 10/06/94 TEMP POt4ER SYSTEMS 20513 10/06/94 000320 TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS MiSC OFFICE SUPPLIES 20513 10/06/94 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 20513 10/06/94 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MZSC OFFICE SUPPLIES 20513 10/06/94 000320 TOMNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 20513 10/06/94 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-163-999-5220 100-164-604-5220 001-165-999-5220 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 20514 10/06/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF' CONP 20514 10/06/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 20514 10/06/94 001065 US C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 20514 10/06/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 20514 10/06/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 20514 10/06/94 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 20515 10/06/94 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 20515 10/06/94 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 20515 10/06/94 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 20516 10/06/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325 U~ 20516 10/06/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE [NLAN 000325 UW 20516 10/06/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE iNLAN 000325 20516 10/06/94 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 108.50 7.93 11.31 66.31 154.87 20.48 2,448.89 188.44 275.09 5.00 312.50 50.00 322.96 114.88 393.82 65.85 10.05 17.00 .60 454.50 666.00 83.~ 596.20 4,157.91 108.50 260.90 3,279.92 93.50 20517 10/06/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM FOR TCSD 190-180-999-5243 18.10 VP'~"REE CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 9 74 15:05 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTBR FOR ALL PERIQOS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 20517 20517 20517 20517 20517 20518 20519 20519 20519 20520 20521 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 10/06/94 000]26 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000]26 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000]26 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 001417 VIRACK, HARYANN UNIFORM NAINT FOR PW UNIFORM NAINT FOR TCSD CITY HALL FLOOR ~TS C.R.C. FLOOR NAT RENTAL SR CENTER FLO01 ~TS 100-16~-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 340-199-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 001~42 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5]]0 BLDG HINT SUPPLIES - CRC BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES - CRC BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES - CRC 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX COPIER MNTY LEASE 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 000346 YATES# GRANT 330-199-999-5239 REIMB. FOR MISC SUPPLIES PURCH 001-110-999-5260 ITEM AMOUNT 27.31 16.35 30.75 69.39 16.75 252.00 ]5.07 ]4.53 29.25 2,986.12 61.75 CHECK AMOUNT 178.65 252.00 98.85 2,986.12 61.75 TOTAL CHECKS 112,655.41 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA PAC~3 10/06/94 15:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CONHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - 320 INFORHATION SYSTENS 350 SUPPORT SERVICES TOTAL ANODNT 307,601.03 8,690.17 577.92 4,085.00 1,320.1~ 258.03 2,210.00 2,257.36 326,999.65 Vp---~E2 CITY OF TENECULA PAGE 1 1 4 15:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 20427 10/03/94 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES 319889 09/29/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 319889 09/29/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRE) ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT REG. FOR JG ANNUAL CONF. 10/Z3 001-120-999-5258 MANUAL TAXES FOR SEPT 190-2070 MANUAL TAXES FOR SEPT 001-2070 195.00 25.54 562.46 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 001-2070 10,818.49 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 2,206.75 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRE) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 103.25 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 2,668.37 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 46.88 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRE) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 213.16 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 280-2070 48.97 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028_t FEDERAL 300-2070 87.98 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 279.83 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 0002a3 FEDERAL 330-2070 92.63 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 137.12 544540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRE) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 3,277.02 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 100-2070 526.99 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRE) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 20.88 344540 10/06/94 00028.t FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 729.24 34/,540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028_t MEDICARE 191-2070 17.44 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ MEDICARE 193-2070 63.98 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 18.12 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 22.43 544540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 58.36 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 23.52 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 63.32 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) SEPT. TAXES 190-2070 25.54- 344540 10/06/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) SEPT TAXES 001-2070 562.46- 395544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 555.65 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 100-2070 134.74 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 229.58 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 191-2070 7.82 593544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SOl 193-2070 28.68 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 280-2070 4,62 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 300-2070 3.58 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/+4 SDI 330-2070 10.54 395544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 24.65 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 2,878.80 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 100-2070 555.39 395544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 STATE 165-2070 22.08 593544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 544.47 593544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 15.40 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 44.95 395544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 9.98 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 30.04 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 64.13 393544 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/+4 STATE 330-2070 17,05 ', 10/06/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 15.15 195.00 588.00 20,936.73 5,197.30 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAcc--~2 10/06/94 15:28 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOO$ VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR /TEN ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 20540 10/18/94 20540 10/18/94 000340 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES, ! POLY SAND BAGS 14" X 26" 000340 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES~ I TAX 100-164-601-5Z18 100-164-601-5218 ITEM AMOUNT 1,148.00 88.97 CHECK AMOUNT 1,2~6.97 TOTAL CHECKS 326,999.65 ITEM 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer October 18, 1994 City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1994 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1994. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of August 31, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of August 31, 1994 2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of August 31, 1994 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of August 31, 1994 Cash Activity for the Month of August: Cash and investments as of August 1, 1994 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of August 31, 1994 $ 46,640,638 2,899,135 (2,913,917) $ 46,625,856 Cash and investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Insffiation City Hail First Interstate Firat Interstate State Treasurer ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of America Bank of America Yield 4.989% 4.390% 4.390% Balance $ 800 4,727 6,650 33,248,896 214,350 238,565 19,979 512,107 12,379,782 $ 46,625,856 (1) (1) (1)-Th~s amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurers Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days City of Temecula Schedule of Fund Balances As of August 31, 1994 City Total Assets $ 28,880,520 Less: Liabilities 4,086,971 Total Fund Balances 24,793,549 Less: Reserved Amounts (1) 4.078,360 Less: Designated Amounts (2) 14,010,734 Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balances $ 6,704,455 Community Services Redevelopment District Agency Total $ 2,902,431 $ 20,822,535 $ 52,605,486 610,713 506,733 5,204.417 2,291,718 20,315,802 47,401,069 998,774 8,306,~4 13,384,078 1,292,944 12,008,858 27,312,536 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,704,455 (1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing, and debt service. (2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations, ITEM 4 APPROVA~~ CITY A'R'ORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joe Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Utility Easements for Pala Community Park Project No. PW93-03 CSD PREPARED BY: g~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Rancho California Water District easement for water service to the Pala Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. Approve the Southern California Edison easement for electrical service to the Pala Community Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the document. DISCUSSION: Construction of the first phase of Pala Community Park began August 17, 1994. In order to provide utility services to the park, the utility agencies require easements to construct and maintain portions of their facilities that lie outside of the public right-of-way. The Rancho California Water District is requiring a thirty foot (30') wide easement from the City to construct and maintain portions of the water main and appurtenances serving the park. Southern California Edison is requiring a six foot (6') wide easement from the City to construct and maintain portions of the edison line and appurtenances serving the park. The easements will be located within Pala Community Park and begin approximately 800 feet north of Loma Linda Road as depicted in the attachments. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is associated with the City granting an easement to the Rancho California Water District or Southern California Edison. Attachments: Grant of Easement to Rancho California Water Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison -1- pw13~agdrpt%94\lO18\rcwd9303,emt WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Real Properties and aJley ~orporaUon) ,,,, ,~ ,,~ ~ - - 35-106 CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic Ihereinafter referred to as "Grantof']. hereby grants to SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. a corporation. its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"), an easement and right of way to construct, use, maintain. operate. alter. add to. repair, replace, reconstruct. inspect and remove at any time and from time to time underground electrical supply systems and communication system (heremafter referred to as "systems"), consisting of wires. underground conduits. cables, vaults, manholes. handholes, and including above-ground enclosures. markers and concrete pads and other appurtenant fixtures and equipment necessary or useful for distributing electricaJ energy and for t~msmitting intelligence by electricaJ means, m, on. over, under, across and along that certain real property m the County of RIverside. State of California. described as follows: A strip of land 6 feet in width lying within LOt 8B and LOt "H" of Tract 21067 as shown in Book 231, pages 41 through 48. inclusive, of Maps m the Office of the Recorder of said County. The centerline of said strip being drsoribed as follows; BEGINNING at a point on the Southwesterly line of said LOt "H' distant thereon 140 feet from the most Southerly comer thereof: thence North 12°30. East a distance of 145 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point 'A". Also a strip of land 10 feet in width lying within said LOt 88, the centerline being described as follows: BEGINNING at the aforementioned Point 'A'; thence North 12°30' East a distance of 12 feet. This legal description was prepared pursuant to Sec. 8730(c) of the Business & Professions Code. The Grantor a~rees for itself, its successors and assigns, not to erect. place or maintain. nor to permit the erection. placement or maintenance of any buffdrag, planter boxes, earth fill or other structures except walls and fences on the above described real property. The Grantee. and its contractors. agents and employees. shall have the right to trim or cut tree roots as may endanger or interfere with said systems and shall have free access to said systems and every pan thereof. at all times. for the purpose of exercising the rights herein granted; provided, however, that in making any excavation on said property of the Grantor, the Grantee shall make the same in such manner as will cause the least lnJu~/to the surface of the ground around such excavation, and shall replace the earth so moved by it and restore the surface of the ground to as near the same condition as it was prior to such excavation as is practicable. EXECUTED this day of ,19 . CiTY OF TEMECUI,A, a body corporate and politic GRANTOR CUSTOA,'~ER COPY Grant of Easement 6677-2303/3-2324 Page 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) On , 19 . before me, . a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared and , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature EXHIBIT "A" LOT D LOT NTS PALA COMMUNITY PARK LOT 88 ~ SCE EASEMENT LOT PROPOSED / %RRiS COURTS # /- S.C.E. EASEMENT PLAT FOR REFERENCE ONLY District W.O. No. Identity ~ANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTR~CT After Recot0at~on Return to: ~ancho Caljfornia Water District 'pet Office Box 9017 emecula, California 92589-9017 Space Above This Line tot Recorders Use GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, CITY OF TEHECULA, a Body Corporate and Politic hereby GRANT (S) to the RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT, a public corporation, a perpetual non-exclusive easement and right of way for pipeline or pipelines, together with incidental appurtenances. connections and structures in, over, under, upon, along, through and across the real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter described. The easement Eranted herein is illustrated on Exhibit "B", to be constructed tn said easements by the RANCHO CAMFORNIA WATER DISTRICT. It is understood and agreed that the easements and rights of way acquired herein are subject to the right of the owner, his successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land within the boundary tines of sucheasementsand rightsof way for park and roadway purposes; provided hovevet. that no fences, block walls, or other structures shall be constructed upon, over, and along said easements and rights of way without first obtaining the written consent of the RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT. No fill of any nature shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the ground, nor shall any earth be removed from the cover of said bipeline after construction, without first obtaining the written apbroval of the RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed thi.s day of __ 19 . CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE The undersigned, being the duly appointed agent of RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT, a public corporation, Riverside County, California, pursuant to its Resolution No. 22, as amended by Resolution NO. 196, does hereby accept on behalf of said District the grant of all interests in real estate for public purposes as described in the attached Grant of Easement dated ,19 Dy and between the RANCHO CALIFORNI~ WATER DISTRICT, and and does hereby certify that the grantee consents to the recordation of said grant. DATED: 19__. RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT By ~OFESS/O4, BIT san All those portions of Lots 87, 88 and 89, together with those portions of Lettered Lots "D" and "H", of Tract 21067, in the City Of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, according to map thereof recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, lying within a strip of land thirty feet wide, 15,00 feet on each side of the following described centerlines: PARCEL I BEGINNING at the Southeasterly corner of said Lot "H", said point being also in the centerline of Temecula Lane, 60.00 feet wide; thence along said centerline North 53°36'44" West 89.96 feet to the centerpoint of a cul-de-sac at the Westerly terminus of said Temecula Lane; thence North 40°38'19'' West 50.00 feet to a point in the side line of said cul de sac and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, said point being also on a 290.00-foot radius curve concave Southwesterly, a radial line to said point bearing North 40°37'45" East; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 04°13'46", a distance of 21.41 feet; thence, tangent to said curve, North 53°36'01'' West 128.69 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence continuing North 53°36'01'' West 110.96 feet to the beginning of a 300.00-foot radius curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 17°39'19'' a distance of 92.44 feet to the beginning of a compound curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 438.00 feet; a radial line to said point bearing South 54°03'18" West; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 15°56'11'' a distance of 121.83 feet to the beginning of a second compound curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 293.00 feet, a radial line to said point bearing South 69°59'29" West; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 17°01'40" a distance of 87.08 feet; thence tangent to said curve 02°58'51'' West 82.23 feet; thence North 87°01'09" West 45.00 feet to the end of the herein described line. PARCgL 2 Beginning at Point "A", hereinbefore described in Parcel 1 above, thence North 36°23'59" East 47.50 feet to the end of the herein described line. The herein described easement shall be augmented by an easement 5.00 feet on both sides of and extending 5.00 feet beyond all pipeline appurtenances including, but not limited to, fire hydrant assemblies, air vacuum/air release assemblies, blow-off assemblies, detector checks, and service connections from the pipeline to the water meter box. The sidelines of said 10.00-foot easements are to be prolonged or shortened to create full 10.00-foot easements at all intersecting courses. N 02'58'5~" w 82.2~' N 87'01'09" W Z..£; T PCL If 1 / L6>7 01 '40" R=293.00' L=87.08' . A= 04'13'46'~ R=290.00' L=21.41' P.O.B. 850'+ TO THE rNT. OF LOMA LINDA RD. ~ LOT5 87-89 8K 231/41'48 R=438.00' L=121.83' / R=300.O0' L=g2.44' pCL J pM 41/72 ' 73 / tANCH@ CAlr- O AT]BR. THIS PLAT IS SOLELY AN AID IN LOCAI1NG THE PNtCFL(S) DESCRIBED IN THE SHEET ' ~ACHED DOCUMENT IT IS NOT A PART ~ THE Wltf'I'T'EN Dr~CRIPllON THEReiN. BIT PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: EASEMENT IN LOTS 1 B ROGERS ENGINEERING 273e3Yr,=R~.Sd~5~.T.,,,,=~US25m PG'S 41-48, FOR PALA F~x (sos) ass-am . T~. (~e) 6"~-Z52~ COMMUNITY PARK OF 1 SHEET SCALE: 1'=50' DRAffi BY: JRV DATE: 09-16-93 CHECKED BY: .Jl~R W.O.~ ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL:,.R~ CITY ATTORNEY ' FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 ContraCt Amendment No. 8 to Community Facilities District 88-12 Engineering Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 8 to provide additional engineering services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange modification in an amount not to exceed $107,000.00. BACKGROUND: The additional costs detailed in the following section for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange modification were arrived at during the design review process with Caltrans, The following items of work will be performed as a result of a change in the alignment of the north bound on and off-ramps and other items of work. The following are the various items necessary to complete the engineering plans and specification for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange modifications. ITEM 1: Caltrans Changes The plans, as base on the approved prior submittals, are approximately 85% complete. The same changes requested for Winchester Road are also being required on Rancho California Road by Caltrans. The changes are primarily to the acceleration lane geometrics and the onramp loop radii. The re-design will cause a severe impact to the adjacent parking and service areas of the existing motel. The amount of the change order necessary is approximately 828,500.00 Subtotal: $28,500.00 -I- r:Xagd~pt\94\1018\CF'D88-12.AdS/njp ITEM 2: Scope Expansion The base contract provided for 56 sheets at a fee of $296,585. JFD's projection at this time is that the actual sheet count will be a minimum of 97 sheets at time of completion. A straight-line interpolation of the revised contract amount is $513,728, a difference of $217,143. JFD agrees to absorb a portion of this expense; however, based on recent experience JFD is requesting an increase of $55,000. Subtotal: $55,000.00 ITEM 3: Rancho California Water District Waterline Relocation The design of Improvement Plans for the relocation of approximately 1,250 lineal feet of existing 20" Rancho California Water District (RCWD) water main within an existing easement. The water main is in conflict with the proposed northbound exit ramp and northbound loop ramp locations. This work will be designed on separate plans to RCWD standards, and for the review of District plan checkers. Will require minimal field survey. Will require the preparation and processing of easement documents. Subtotal: $12,000.00 ITEM 4: Embassy Suites Parking Configuration Due to the modification to the north bound off-ramp, a portion of the existing parking must be re-configured. The estimate to include the parking lot modification into the Caltrans plan set will require: 1 - tayout sheet 1 - proposed construction sheet 1 - existing landscaping sheet 1 - proposed landscaping sheet 1 - detail sheet additional special provisions and standards covering the non Caltrans work Subtotal: $11,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT: $107,000.00 -2- r:~agdtpt\94\1018\CFD88-12.AdS/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. Adequate funds are available within the budget of the District. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: A. Approved Contract $551,950 B. A portion of Amendment No. 4 (Approved 9/14/93) 3,330 C. A Dortion of Amendment No. 7 (Approved 5/10/94) 4,500 D. Proposed Amendment No. 8 107,000 Total: $666,780 Funds are available from AcCount No. 600-165-999-6201. Attachment: Amendment No. 8, J.F. Davidson Associates -3- r:~agd~tX94\1018\CFD88-12.AdS/ajp AMENDMENT NO. 8 J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES CONTRACT ORDER NO. 0423 The Agreement dated December 13, 1990 between the City of Temecula, and J.F. Davidson Associates (herein referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: RE: Professional Design Service for CFD 88-12, I-15/Rancho California Rd. Interchange Modifications Section I The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following activities: I. Scope of Services The additional costs detailed in the following section for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications were arrived at during the design review process with Caltrans. The following items of work are being performed as a result of a change in the alignment of the north bound on and off-ramp, and other items of work. The following are the various items of work the necessary to complete the engineering plans and specification for the I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications. ITEM 1: Caltrans Changes The plans, as base on the approved prior submittals, are approximately 85% complete. The same changes requested for Winchester Road are also being required on Rancho California Road by Caltrans. The changes are primarily to the acceleration lane geometrics and the onramp loop radii. The re-design will cause a severe impact to the adjacent parking and service areas of the existing motel. The amount of the chan~ie order necessary is approximately $28,500.00 Subtotal: $28,500.00 ITEM 2: Scope Expansion The base contract provided for 56 sheets at a fee of $296,585. JFD's projection at this time is that the actual sheet count will be a minimum of 97 sheets at time of completion, A straight-line interpolation of the revised contract amount is $513,728, a difference of $217,143. JFD agrees to absorb a portion of this expense; however, based on recent experience JFD is requesting an increase of $55,000. Subtotal: $55,000.00 -4- r:%agdrpt\94\1018\CFD88-12.AdS/ajp ITEM 3: Rancho California Water District Waterline Relocation The design of improvement Plans for the relocation of approximately 1,250 lineal feet of existing 20" Rancho California Water District (RCWD) water main within an existing easement. This water main is in conflict with the proposed northbound exit ramp and northbound loop ramp locations. This work will be designed on separate plans to RCWD standards, and for the review of District plan checkers. Will require minimal field survey. Will require the preparation and processing of easement documents. Subtotal: $12,000.00 ITEM 4: Embassy Suites Parking Configuration Due to the modification to the north bound off-ramp, a portion of the existing parking must be re-configured. The estimate to include the parking lot modification into the Caltrans plan set will require: 1 - layout sheet 1 - proposed construction sheet 1 - existing landscaping sheet 1 - proposed landscaping sheet 1 - detail sheet additional special provisions and standards covering the non Caltrans work Subtotal: $11,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT: $107,000 Section 2 Compensation shall be for all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed One Hundred Four Thousand Eight Hundred Eight Dollars ($104,808.00) All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. Adequate funds are available within the budget of the District. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: A. Approved Contract $551,950 B. A portion of Amendment No. 4 (Approved 9/14/93) 3,330 C. A portion of Amendment No. 7 (Approved 5/10/94) 4,500 D. Proposed Amendment No. 8 107,000 Total: $666,780 -5- r:~d~pt\94\1018~CFD88-12,AdS/ajp ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATFORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joe Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer (Interim) October 18, 1994 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Traffic Signal at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca (Project No. PW93-10) PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW93-10, Traffic Signal at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca. BACKGROUND: The City Council has approved the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendation to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Avenida Barca. The existing intersection is now controlled with a four-way STOP. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction. The project includes installation of a four-way traffic signal and appurtenances. The estimated construction cost for this project is $90,000. These plans are available for review in the City Engineer's office. This project is being funded through the Federal FY1992/93 Surface Transportation Program (STP). STP funds have been allocated in the amount of $1 00,000for the construction of the project and for the project administration. Caltrans has reviewed the project and approved it for STP funding and has given the City the authorization to advertise this project for public bids. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is being funded from the Surface Transportation Program and administrated by Caltrans. -I- r:~agdrpt\94\1018~pw93-10.bld/sh ITEM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~ CITY ATI'ORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Award of Construction Contract for Project No. PW94-12 FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project PREPARED BY: (~,/~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for Project No. PW94-12, FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, to Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. for $179,940.89and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of ~17,994.09 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1994 the City Council approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project includes slurry sealing, crack sealing, treating of all oil stains, and replacement of all stripping and street legends. The engineer's estimate for this project was $260,000. Four bids werepublicly opened on September 29, 1994 and results are as follows: Base Bid 1. Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc .................... $179,940.89 2. Calif. Pavement Maintenance Co., Inc ............ 186,831.00 3. Graham Contractors, inc ...................... 188,574.61 4. American Asphalt Repair & Resurfacing Co., Inc ..... 212,532.85 Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. has not performed any work for the City, but has performed well in other areas of Orange and Los Angeles Counties based on comments from references of previous work. -1- r:\egdtpt\94~1018~p w94-12.ewdlajp The construction schedule is 60 working days. Work is expected to begin in December, 1994 and be completed by the end of March, 1995. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded from the Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164- 601-5402. The total project amount is $197,934.98 which includes the contract amount of $179,940.89 plus 10% contingency of $17,994.09 Attachments: 1. Contract -2- r:\agdrpt%94\1018~pw94-12.awd/ajp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW94-12 FY 94-95 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the day of ,19 , by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and · hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. RN94-12 FY 94-95 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. RN94-12 FY 94-95 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-12 FY 94-95 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip~projects~pw94-12\contract/ajp sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000-$75,000 $75,000-$500,000 Over $500,000 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETENTION PERCENTAGE 3% $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract, Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. 9. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment, CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects\pw94~12\contract/ajp PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.6, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included} and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. 13. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw94-12\contract/ejp 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip~projects\pw94-12\contractlajp IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron Roberts, Mayor CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip\projects\pw94-12\contrect/ajp ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 SUBJECT: Award of Construction Contract for Project No, PW94-13 FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program PREPARED BY: ~/~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for Project No. PW94-13 FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program, to Hillcrest Contracting, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $52,307.85. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,230.78 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1994 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for FY94-95 P.C.C. City wide Repair Program, Project No. PW94-13, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for construction. The bids were publicly opened on September 29, 1994. This project includes removal and replacement of curb and gutter, sidewalk, cross gutters and storm drain facilities citywide. The engineer's estimate for this project was $130,000. Eleven bids were received for the project and the results are as follows: Be~q Bid 1. Hillcrest Contracting ................... $52,307.85 2. Pro-Civil ............................. 57,045.80 3. Los Angeles Engineering ................. 60,644.70 4. KLM Engineering ....................... 65,139.59 5. John C. Gosney ....................... 70,842.50 6. B-1 Enterprise ......................... 74,693.50 7. Sean Malek .......................... 74,874.00 -1- r:\agdrpt\94\1018\pw94-13.awd/ajp 8. West Coast Construction ................. 80,034.50 9. All American Asphalt .................... 86,791.00 10. S.G. Welsh ........................... 89,956.00 11. A.L. Chavez .......................... 97,000.00 Hillcrest Contracting has performed work similar in scope to the proposed project for other agencies within Southern California. Based on comments we have received from the references listed in the bid documents, the work completed by Hillcrest Contracting has been acceptable. The construction schedule is for 45 calendar days. Work is expected to begin in early November, 1994 and be completed by mid December, 1994. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164- 601-5402. The total project amount is $57,538.63 which includes the contract amount of $52,307.85 plus 10% contingency of $5,230.78. Attachments: 1. Contract -2- r:\agdrpt\94\1018\pw94-13 .awd/ajp CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW94-13 FY 94-95 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the day of ,19 , by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and · hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW94-13 FY 94-95 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. RN94-13, FY 94-95 CITY~/IDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213} 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-13, FY 94-95 CITYWIDE P.C.C. REPAIR PROGRAM. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects\pw94-12~conttect/ajp successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000-$75,000 $75,000-$500,000 Over $500,000 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETENTION PERCENTAGE 3% $2,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum sh~ll be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. 9. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 10. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for CONTRACT CA-3 r:~cip\projects\pw94-12\contract/ajp each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTORshall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. 13. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one ye~ir of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw94-12\contract/ajp 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip~projects%pw94-12%contract/ajp IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE CITY OF TEMECULA By: Ron Roberrs, Mayor CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip~projects\pw94-12\contract/ajp ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager APPROVAL: CITY ATTORNEY Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official October 18, 1994 Establishment of Fee for Newsrack Installation Encroachment Permit RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR APPLICATION FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NEWSRACK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. DISCUSSION: On October 11,1994,the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 94-28, establishing Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code, for the regulation of the installation and maintenance of newsracks in the public rights-of-way. Section 10.36.040 of the Temecula Municipal Code, provides for permit to be issued by the Director of Public Works for the installation and maintenance of such newsracks. It is Staff's recommendation that the encroachment permit be issued for newsracks pursuant to Section 10.36.040 and that the fee be twenty-five (25) dollars as currently charged for encroachment permits. The Chief Building Official of Building and Safety and the Director of Public Works have studied the time required of the City Staff members to review and have determined that the actual cost to the City of Staff time is not less than $25.00. V:\TONY~AGENDA~NE~NSRACK,RPT 10/12/94 tde RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TIff, CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR APPLICATION FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NEWSRACK IN ~ PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. TifF, CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES FH~,REBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 11, 1994 the City Council adopted Ordinanc~ No. 94-28 adding Chapter 10.36 to the Temecula Municipal Code providing for the regulation of newsracks in public fights-of-way. B. Section 10.36.040 of the Temecula Municipal Code provides that application for installing and mailltaining newsracks shah be fried with the licensing officer within one business day of the placement within the City. C. Section 10.36.040, also authorizes the City Council to establish an application fee based upon the actual costs of processing the application. D. Based upon the study conducted by the Chief Building Official of Building and Safety and the Director of Public Works, the actual cost to the City of processing the application for the encmachrnent permit required by Section 10.36.040 is not less than $25.00. Section 2. The permit required by Temecula Municipal Code section shall be an encroachment permit issued pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Chapter 10.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code. The encroachment permit shall be applicable to all newsrocks operated by the applicant within the City of Temecuh. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby establish the cost of such encroachment permit to be twenty-five (25) dollars. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1994. Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAI .rFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF 'r~YiECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-IF_~RRy DO CERTI~-rX' that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 18th day of October, 1994, by the following roll call vote. CO~CILIMEMBERS: NOES: ABSENT: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILMItVIBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 10 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney October 18, 1994 Pala Park Reimbursement Agreement RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the "Temecula Lane and Pala Channel Reimbursement Agreement." DISCUSSION: In April 1991, the City Council authorized recordation of the final tract map for Tract 21067 (Kingsway). At the same time, the City entered into the "Park Agreement" providing that Kingsway would dedicate three lots to the City to be developed as Pala Community Park. At the time that Kingsway obtained approval of Tract 21067, they posted bonds requiring construction of the subdivision improvements by October 23, 1992, These improvements included construction of Temacula Lane and a main line sewer which also would serve Pala Park, along with installation of Pala Drainage Channel. Since that time, Kingsway has not only failed to construct the necessary subdivision improvements, but also lost its property to Union Bank. ,Santa Barbara 86, a California Limited Partnership, has now obtained the property from Union Bank, Rather than attempt to compel the bonding company to construct these improvements, City Staff has negotiated a Reimbursement Agreement with Santa Barbara 86 that would provide as follows: The City would construct Temecula Lane, thereby providing access to Pala Park. The City will be reimbursed for the cost of the road when Santa Barbara 86 pulls its fourth building permit or by November 1, 1998, whichever occurs first. (Santa Barbara 86 would be able to build its three model homes without triggering reimbursement.) Agenda Report - Pala Park Reimbursement Agreement October 18, 1994 Page 2. Santa Barbara 86 would complete construction of the sewer main line by March 1995. Santa Barbara 86 would also deposit $20,000 with the City to pay for a storage tank to be installed by the City if Santa Barbara 86 fails to complete the sewer line on time. Because Pala Channel improvements have not been constructed, Santa Barbara 86 will maintain the dirt channel to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. If Santa Barbara 86 fails to maintain the channel, the City may perform the work and back-charge Santa Barbara 86. Santa Barbara 86 will provide a policy of title insurance on behalf of the City in the amount of $250,000 for Pala Road Park. It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Reimbursement Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Reimbursement Agreement RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 BUSINESS PAR/( DRIVE TEM_ECULA, CA 92590 Exempt from Recording Fee per Gov't C. § 6103 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of October , 1994, by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and Santa Barbara 86, a California Limited Partnership, ("Owner"), with respect to the following: RECITALS R-1. Owner owns the real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"), which is adjacent to Loma Linda Road in the City of Temecula, California. R-2. The County of Riverside approved Tentative Tract Map NO. 21067. R-3. On or about April 23, 1991, Owner's predecessor-in- interest, Kingsway Development Corporation ("Kingsway") signed a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract No. 21067 (the "Improvement Agreement"). R-4. On Or about April 23, 1991, the City Council of the City authorized recordation of the final map for Tract 21067, which Map was recorded on May 3, 1991. R-5. The Improvement Agreement required that Kingsway, no later than October 23, 1992, install certain improvements, including construction of Temecula Lane ("Temecula Lane"), installation of a main sewer line, and installation of the Pala Drainage Channel ("Pala Channel") (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Improvements"). R-6. The Improvement Agreement further provided that Kingsway maintain Pala Channel until the Channel was fully improved. Adequate maintenance requires the Channel be periodically cleared of sediment, debris and vegetation. R-7. To secure performance of the Improvement Agreement, Owner filed with the City Bond No. 117-85-65 Of the Insurance Company of the West. ORA, 6.4 October ~, 1994 i Extended Bid Amounts Temecula Lane 3% Contingency Subtotal 10% City Overhead $ 77,342.00 $ 2,320.00 $ 79.662.00 $ 7,966.00 Total $ 87,628.00 1B. Until Owner has installed Pala Channel as required pursuant to the Improvement Agreement, Owner shall maintain Pala Channel by periodically removing sediment, vegetation and debris from the Channel to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. Should Owner fail to so maintain the Channel following 15 day written demand from the City Engineer, then the City may use its own contractor to maintain the Channel. In such a case, Owner shall reimburse City for one hundred percent (100%) of City's actual costs and expenses for removing sediment, vegetation and debris from Pala Channel, plus ten percent (10%) overhead. 2. City shall pay for work performed pursuant to Section 1. Actual costs shall be identified and billed to Owner with all invoices, receipts and supporting documentation. 3. Prior to authorizing Jaska to proceed with any change orders over and above the three percent (3%) contingency associated with construction of Temecula Lane, City shall obtain Owner approval of the change order, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 4. The Reimbursement for Temecula Lane and Pala Channel shall be subject to interest, calculated at a rate of seven percent (7%) per annum, simple interest, beginning from when the City actually pays for work performed pursuant to Section l, and accruing interest until full reimbursement is repaid to City. 5. Prior to such time as the fourth building permit is issued for construction of dwelling units on the Property, or by November 1, 1998, whichever occurs first, Owner shall pay the City the reimbursement owing City for Temecula Lane and Pala Channel. No building permit shall be issued for Tract 21067 unless and until Owner has paid City full reimbursement. 6. Should Owner fail to timely pay City the reimbursement, City may make demand on said Bond No. 117-85-65 for the reimbursement amount. Insurance Company of the west shall pay the City the reimbursement within seven days of receiving the City demand. ORA, 6.40ctc~aer 7, 1~4 3 7. The main line sewer within Tract 21067 will also serve the snack bar and restrooms within Pala Park. Owner shall begin construction of the main line sewer no later than January 10, 1995, ~nd complete it no later than March 30, 1995. To secure this obligation, Owner shall, within ten (10) days of City approval of this Agreement, deposit Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) with the City, in the form of cash, a letter of deposit or a certificate of deposit. Should Owner fail to timely complete the sewer line, then the City may take any and all of the following actions: 1) construct a sewage holding tank using the $20,000 deposit; 2) order Insurance Company of the West to construct the main line sewer pursuant to Bond No. 117-85-65, and 3) may refuse to issue any new grading, building or related permits for Tract No. 21067, and order work to be halted on all such permits previously issued. 8. Within seven days of execution of this Agreement, Owner shall remove the deed of trust recorded against Lots 87, 88 and 89 of Pala Community Park and provide a CLTA title policy for the same lots, as required pursuant to the Park Agreement. 9. This Agreement and any amendment may be recorded with the County Recorder of Riverside County. All parties agree to execute a termination of this Agreement in recordable form upon the completion of the obligations of Owner hereunder. 10. Any notice given hereunder shall be deemed effective (i) on receipt by receipted personal delivery; (ii) business day after being sent by a recognized overnight mail delivery service; or (iii) two business days after being deposited in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid, certified, return receipt requested. Notices shall be sent addressed as follows: oIle City: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: City Clerk Owner: Santa Barbara 86 c/o Westmark Communities One Columbia, Suite 220 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Bonding: Insurance Company of The West 2645 Financial Court, Suite D San Diego, CA 92117 Any party may change its address for receipt of notice by giving written notice to all other parties. ORANGE:856.4 October 7, 1W~, 4 11. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings, or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, undertakings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 12. If any terms, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform, taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. 13. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto. The rule of the construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. 14. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 15. This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same instrument. 16. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 0RA. ~6.4 october 7, 1994 5 17. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Owners warrants and represents that he/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of is/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he/they/has/have the authority to bind Owners to the performance of its obligations hereunder. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts. 18. Entering into or a breach of this Agreement shall not affect, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value. 19. For purposes of sales of improved lots to consumers, this Agreement, if recorded, shall be deemed to terminate as to individual lots upon the issuance by City of a notice of completion for a structure on said lot. 20. Should it become necessary for any party to bring legal action to enforce any provision of this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover all attorney's fees and court costs reasonably incurred thereby. III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III ORANGE:856,40cto~r 7, 1~4 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF TEMECULA: Dated: By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk Dated: g/ SANTA BARBARA 86, a California Limited Partnership B.J. Bird President, Westmark Communities, Inc., a California Corporation, General Partner ORA, ,5..4 October 7, 1W4 7 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No 5907 State of County Of On OC-'~*'~'~' DATE personally appeared i~. ~::~. ~-.L,c~ before me, NAME, TFrLE OF OFFICER- E.G, 'JANE DOE N)O~LIC" NAME(S) OF SiGNER(S) personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/aro subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/shc/thcy executed the same in his/~ authorized capacity(ioc), and that by his/her-/-t4~r ~_.,.^ signature(s-) on the instrument the person(s-), oloresE. WellS or the entity upon behalf of which the ~,~OTA%~%O%'~.~ORN~, , person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reat~achment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATtORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTrPf(IESI SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Rernmet Ave., P,O, Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 Dated~ / rsr ~ '~5/~.& Oetaber ~,, 199& INSURANCE COZv[PANY OF THE WEST HOME OFFICE: SAN DIEGO. CAUFORNIA Carrifle Copy ot POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Insurance Company of the West. a CorPoration duly authorized and existing under the laws of the State of California and having its principal office in the City of San Diego, California. does herel~y noramate, carlstatute and appoint: its true and lawful Attorney(s)-~n-Fact, with full Dower end authority hereby Conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, s&ti, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof, This I~ower of Attorney is granted and is signed and Sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following ResolutiOn aijodted Dy the Board of Directors of the insurance Company of the West at a muting duly called and held on the Sixth day of FePruary, 1973, which Said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the followrag is a true, full and complete "RESOLVED: Tibet the President Or Secretary may from time to time al~point Attorneys-in-Fact to represent and act for and IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Insurance Company of the West has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed Dy its duly authorized officers this 21%1'D DAY OF JULY 1985. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO INSURANCE COMPANy. OF THE WEST On this2ND DAY OF JULY 1985 before the suPscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Ca{ifornia. in and for the County of San Diego. duly commissioned and Qualified. came E~NEST Rj~DY, President of INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST. to me personally known to be the individual and officer described m and who executed the preceding instrument. and be acknow- ledged the execution of the same, and being Oy me duly sworn, deooseth and edith. that he is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of the Said Corporation, and that the said Corporate Seal and his signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the Said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal. at the City of San Diego. the day and year first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO NolarV Public I. the undersigned, Richard S, King, Secretary of the insurance Company of the West. do hereby certify that the original POWER OF ATTORNEY, of which the foregorag is a full, true and correct COPy, is in full force and effect, and has ncrl been revoi<eo. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, f have hereunto subscribed my name as Secretary, and affixed the Corporate Seal of the COrDor this 6th day of October tCw CAL 37 fREV 5/R~1 ,9 9~. CALIFORNIA ALL, PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT County of sa= Diego On October 6, 1994 personally appeared [] personally known to me before me, Tract E. O'Connor, Notary Public Ron H. Ballard - 08 - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are suDscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal OPTIONAL Though the data pelow is not required hy law, it may prove valuable to persons relying On the aocument an¢ Could prevent frauoulent reattacnment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL CORPORAT~ OF;ICER TrrLa$) ""l PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL ~ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ~ TRUSTEE(S) ____, GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ~'~ OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT T1TLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Insurance Company of the West SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 21067 PREPARED BY: Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 21067, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On September 18, 1991, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 21067, and entered into subdivision agreements with: Kingsway Construction Corporation 2650 Camino Del Rio North San Diego, CA 92108 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by Insurance Company of the West as follows: Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amount of $1,571,500 ($1,255,500, $149,500, and $166,500, respectively) to cover faithful performance for street, water and sewer improvements. Bond No. 117 85 65 in the amount of $785,750 ($628,000, $75,000, and $82,750, respectively) to cover labor and materials for street, water and sewer improvements. 3. Bond No. 117 85 66 in the amount of $31,284to cover subdivision monumentation. r:~agd~fi94\lO18X~'21067/ajp Kingsway Construction Corporation subsequently lost control of the site. The new developer for the subdivision is: Santa Barbara 86 (Westmark Communities, Inc., General Partner) One Columbia Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 and they have submitted replacement agreements and securities for the contractual work. Replacement surety bonds have been posted by the same surety, Insurance Company of the West, under the same bond numbers and in the same amounts as the original documents. The contractual eighteen (18) month period for completion of the work under the original agreement expired March 18, 1993. It is Staff's recommendation that the new developer, Santa Barbara 86 (Westmark Communities, Inc.) be granted an eighteen (18) month construction completion period as set forth in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Section 20-"Time for Completion of Work/Time Extensions). The contractual completion date would become April 11, 1996. The affected streets, although not completed nor accepted, are Trotsdale Drive, Canterfield Drive, Rein Court, Muirfield Drive, and portions of Jedediah Smith Road and Temecula Lane. Attachment: Location Map Substitute Public Improvement Bonds (on file) Substitute Agreement (on file) r:~agdtpt\94\lOlg\tr21067/.tjp ~t~ VICINITY MAP fro 83 ~ ZW TRACT NO. 21067 Location Map ITEM 12 APPROVAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Sanitary Sewer - Solana Way/I-15 Crossing RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement authorizing Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) to proceed with design and construction of Solana Way/I-15 Sewer Pipeline Crossing. BACKGROUND: On April 1, 1992, CFD No. 88-12, Eastern Municipal Water District, Tomond Properties, a California general partnership, and the City of Temecula entered into an agreement to construct a sanitary sewer system, from Ynez Road and Solana Way westerly under I-15, to provide service to that area. The capacity in the existing 8" sewer line, south of Solana Way, is now exceeded. The minimum line required to provide capacity for CFD No. 88-12 in that area is 15" diameter. EMWD's master plan of sewers indicates that 24" diameter will be ultimately recluired to provide service to that tributary area. EMWD has proposed the following: 1. That EMWD would design or have designed by others the system described. 2. That EMWD would review plans prepared by others and process the plans for review and permits through Caltrans for the I-215 crossing. -1 - r:~agdrpt\94~ 1018~eewer 5. 6. 7. They would request bids for the construction of: 15" diameter pipe and alternate 24" diameter pipe as required by master plan That appropriate casings would be provided for each alternate for I-15 crossing That EMWD would pay the difference in cost of over-sizing from the 15" diameter system to the required 24" diameter system. That the costs would be allocated based on the unit prices of the lowest responsible bidder. EMWD would assume the responsibility for contract administration, construction staking and inspection. That the total cost to CFD No. 88-12 for all of the above would not exceed $307,285.00. FISCAL IMPACT: CFD No. 88-12 has allocated funds for several projects in that district. Sanitary sewers discussed herein is one of these projects. Sufficient funds are available through CFD 88-12 budget to provide the required $307,285.00for the project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Copy of letter to Mr. Hooite Rugge, EMWD -2- r:\egdmt\94~1018\sewer Eastern Municipal Water District Director of lht Maro!lnlltm, Wattr D.r/ict of &nahtrn ~ Chester C. Gilbert Mr. Joe Keysack Acting Director of Public Works CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Ternsouls, CA 92590 October 7, 1994 Chester C. Gilbert, President Wm. G. Aldfkige, Vice President Mlrinn V. Aehley Rodger D. Sisroe Richard R. Hell Dear Mr. Keysack: SUBJECT: CFD 88-12, Solana Way/I-15 Sewer Pipeline Crossing In response to Mr. Tim D. Serlet's August 16, 1994, letter requesting our District to prepare the plans and construct the sewer pipeline crossing the 1-15 freeway at Solana Way, we have prepared an estimate to design and construct a 15-inch (minimum required) or a 24-inch (master planned) sewer pipeline. The estimated cost to build the minimum required 15-inch sewer pipeline (W relieve the 8-inch sewer pipeline south of Solaria Way) is $294,000.00, and the estimated cost to build the master planned sewer pipeline at this location is $359,000.00. We propose to receive alternate bids for the 15-inch and 24-inch pipelines. We prefer to build the 24-inch master pined pipeline and would participate in the cost of the oversizing. It is estimated that it will take approximately ten months (see attached schedule) to design, advertise, award and construct this project. This includes time to obtain the necessary permits and easements. Since time is of the essence and there is a need to adhere to the conditions of the April 1, 1992, Joint Financing and Acquisition, we request that you sign a copy of this letter as designated below indicating your agreement with its content and return it to us so we may start design. Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · San Jaclnto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257 Main Ofnce: 2045 S. San Jacinto Street, San Jacinto · Customer Serviee/Engineerlag Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hemet, CA City of Temecula CFD 88-12 Solana Way October 7, 1994 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 925-7676, ext. 381. Sincerely, Hootte Rugge~ Acting Assistant General Manager, Engineering Services HR/HAS:cdd Attachments cc: Bill Green, RBF and Associates CharHe Bachmann Jim Petersen A1 Spencer Dave Crosley The City of Temecula agrees to have EMWD design and construct the Solana Way/I-15 Sewer Pipeline Crossing. We also agree to pay a total amount not to exceed $307,285.00 in accordance with our letter dated August 16, 1994, for this project. Signed: Mayor, City of Temecula EARLY EARLY BUDGET START FINISH PCT COST 3o.o,D.o2,D0O COST TO DATE COST TO COI4PLETE ~?000 3000 I000 0 50000 I5000 18000 2000 0 10000 0 3000 0 2000 17OO 0 1700 285000 o O O 271000 5000 3000 2000 0 4000 O 359000 320 _ 280 _ 240 _ 200 160 + 120 _ 80 0 44 rC~,SN 0 .C 0 .O 0 ,O 0 0 O 0 : I;'~ ~, ~e. LLL LBo Lso SaxSOLANA WAY/I-15 SE,. P/L CROSSI BASELINE SCHEDULE ~0/04/94 HGM/SA LEVEL 3 SCHEDULE WITH CASH PLOW EMWO pRINAVERA PROJECT PLANNER S~*SOLANA WAY/I-15 SEW P/L CROSSING* REPORT DATE ~0CT94 RUN NO. 54 NOreCIpO~/~O#495-206/CO# 13:10 CLASSIC SCHEDULE REPORT*SORT BY PNAS# ESw EF~ TF SPEC S START DATE 1APR92 FIN DATE 19sJUL95 DATA DATE 1APR92 PAGE NO ACTIVITY OR1G REN ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION EARLY EARLY LATE L~TE TOTAL ID DUR OUR ~ COOE START FINISH START FINISH FLOAT S/+VO0 0 0 0 S NEEDS IDENTIFICATION CORPLETE 1APR92 17'NAY92 46 S4V 883* 883w 0 S "** PLANNING PHASE ,t, 1APR9E 31AUG94 17MAYSZ 160CT94 ~6 S~VIO 883 883 0 S PLANNING 1APRSZ 31AUG94 17NAY92 160CT94 46 S4V30 30 30 0 S ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ~AUGS~* 31AUG94 17SEP9~ 160CT94 46 S4V90 0 0 0 S PROJECT CONCEPT APPROVAL 170CT94w 170CT94 0 S~P30 10 10 0 S ENVIRONMENTAL REQUEST (CEQA 1 FORM) 170CT94 Z60CT94 Z1NOV94 30NOV94 35 S~P 45* 45* O S ,we PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE ewe 170CT94 30NOV94 170CT94 30NOV94 0 S~PIO 45 45 0 S PRELIN]NARY DESIGN 170CT94 30NOV94 170CT94 30NOV94 0 S4P20 45 45 0 S RIGHT-Of'WAY, PERMIT & UTILITY SVCS. IDENTIF. 170CT94 30NOV94 170CT94 30NOV94 0 54P90 0 0 0 S 10~ DES REV/SOg&PD8 - PROJECT APPROVAL COMPLETE 30NOV94 30NOV94 0 S4010 35 ]5 0 S FINAL OESIGN TO 50% 1DEC94 4JANS5 1DEC94 4JANS5 0 S4D20 60 60 O S R/W, PERMIT & UTILITY SVCS. PREP. & ACQUISITION 1DEC94 29JAN95 713EC94 4FEB95 6 S4D30 110 110 0 S ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS/APPROVAL 1DEC94 20MAR95 20EC94 21NARS5 1 S4D 111' 111' 0 S www FINAL DESIGN PHASE wee 1DEC94 21MAR95 1DEC94 21MARS' 0 S4D40 0 0 0 S BOX REVIEW, PLANS & SPECS CORPLETE 4JAN95 4JANS. 0 S4DSO 21 21 0 S FINAL OESIGN TO 9SX 5JAMS] 25JAN95 5JAN95 ZBJANS5 0 S4D60 0 0 0 S 95X REVIEW, FINAL PLANS & SPECS COMPLETE 25JAN95 25JAN95 0 S4070 10 10 0 S CAMERA READY PREPARATION - PLANS & SPECS 26JAN95 4FEB95 Z6JAN95 4FEB95 0 S4080 0 0 0 S IOOX - PLANS & SPECS SIGNED 4FEB95 4FEB95 0 S~DSO 45 45 0 S R/W & PERMIT FINAL ACQUISITION 5FES95 Z1NAR95 5FEB95 Z1NAR95 0 S4810 0 0 0 S AOVERTIZE FOR BIDS ZTJ4AR95 22MAR95 0 S4B 45w 45* 0 S it. BID / AWARD PHASE *** ZZMAR9S SHAY95 22MAR95 SHAY95 0 S~SEO 45 45 0 5 BID / AWARD PERIGO ZZMAR95 5NAY95 Z~qAR95 5NAY95 0 S4C20 0 0 0 S FINAL UTILITY SERVICES INSTALLATION 6NAY9S 5NAY95 20JUMS5 19JUNS5 45 S4C30 0 0 0 S ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & OPERATING PERMITS 6~4AY95 SNAYS5 20JUN95 19JUNS5 ~5 S~CIO 0 0 0 S NOTICE TO PROCEED ISSUEO 64qAYS5 6~4AY95 0 S4C40 45 45 0 S CONSTRUCTION TO TEST & START UP 6NAY95 19JUN95 61(AY95 19JUN95 O S4CSO 49 49 0 S FIELO CONSTRUCTION AS-BUZLTS 6NAY95 2.~JUN95 1JUN9S 19JUL95 26 S~C 75t 75t 0 S ewe CONSTRUCTION PHASE *~* 6NAY95 19jULS5 61~AY95 19JUL95 C S4C60 15 15 0 S TEST & START-UP 20JUN95 4JUL95 20JUN95 4JUL95 0 ENMO PRINAVERA PROJECT pLANNER S/,*SOLANA WAY/]-15 SEW P/L CROSSINGw REP~ORT DATE /eOCTg& RUN NO. 54 NonCIPO4./i,KY,495-Z06/~l:)l SPEC S START DATE IAPR92 FIN DATE 19JUL95 15:10 C SCHEDULE REPORT*SORT BY PHAS, ES, EF, TF DATA DATE 1APR92 PAGE NO. 2 ACTIVITY S~C70 15 15 0 S4C80 0 0 0 S4T99 0 0 0 ORIG REN ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION EARLY EARLY LATE LATE TOTAL DUR DUR ~ CODE START FINISH START FINISH FLOAT S TEST & START-UP NONITORING 20JUNgS 6JUL95 20JUN95 6JUL95 0 S SUBSTANTIAL CCNPLETIOR ACCEPTANCE ~JUL95 ~JUL95 O S PUNCH LIST 5JUL95 19JUL95 5JUL95 19JUL95 0 S FINAL ACCEPTANCE & TURNOVER TO Ot~ 19JUL95 19JUL95 0 S wwww** TOTAL COST e, 20JULgS 19JUL95 20JUL95 19JUL95 0 ITEM 13 ORDINANCE NO. 94-29 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AME~NDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. S589, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) AND A-2-20 (HEAVY AGRICULTURE, 20 ACRE MINIMUM) TO SP (SPECIFIC PLAN) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALWORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application land use district as shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as many be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temeeula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in affect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone No. 5589 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior 'to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the offxce of the City Clerk. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1994. ATFEST: Ron Robe~s, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Orda~94-29 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-29 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the llth day of October, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 18th day of October, by the following roll call vote: AYF_~: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberrs NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 14 ORDINANCE NO. 94-30 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIHC PLAN NO. 263 (REGIONAL CENTER) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Temecula, entitled "Temecula/Rancho California Area" as adopted pursuant to Section 34 of Ordinance No. 90-04, is amended as shown which map is made a part of this ordinance. Section 2. The City of Temecula hereby adopts those Land Use standards set forth in that certain document entitled "Temecula Regional Center Draft Specific Plan/EIR" dated February 1, 1994 on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1994. ATrF. ST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] OrdsX94~30 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-30 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the llth day of October, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 18th day of October, by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz June S. Greek, City Clerk Ords\94-30 2 ITEM 15 ORDINANCE NO. 94-31 AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CAIJFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMF~NT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND COSCAN HOMES CAL~ORNIA, INC., DBA COSCAN DAVIDSON HOMES, FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164 - RORIPAUGH, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 0017 (PA94-0017) WtIEREAS, Section 65864 et ~t. of the Government Code of the State of California and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of agreements establishing and maintaining requirements applicable to the development of real property; and, WtlEREAS, in accordance with the procedure specified in said Resolution, Coscan Homes California, Inc., hereinafter "COSCAN" has filed with the City of Temecula an application for a Development Agreement which reflects an amendment and re-statement of existing County Development. Agreement//37, (hereinafter "this Agreement"), of a residential housing subdivision on its property located at the northwest comer of Nicolas Road and North General Kearney Road, hereinafter the "Subject Property" which application has been reviewed and accepted for ffiing by the Planning Director; and, WHEREAS, notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of this Agreement with Coscan, has been duly given in the form and manner required by law, and the Planning Commission and City Council of said City have each conducted public hearings on September 19, 1994 (Planning Commission), and October 11, 1994 (City Council) at which time they heard and considered all evidence relevant and material to said subject. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines, with respect to this Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Coscan, that it: A. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that this Agreement makes reasonable provision for the use of certain real property for residential development consistent with the General Plan's land use desighation of Medium Density Residential; B. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the Subject Property referred to therein is located as this Agreement provides for residential development pursuant to a Specific Plan which includes significant park Orals/g4-31 I and recreational improvements; C. Is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with the remainder of the City; D. Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof; E. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days before the Planning Commission public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; F. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the date, time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, a general explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description and text or by diagram of the location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust administrative remedies; G. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the City Council public hearing, mailed at least ten (I0) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant, to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools,. police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; H. Notice of the City Council hearing included the date, the time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, the general explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and the notice of the need to exhaust administrative remedies; I. City Council approved this Agreement by Ordinance based upon evidence and findings of the Planning Commission and new evidence presented at the hearing on this Agreement, giving its reasons therefore and set forth their relationship between this Agreement and the General Plan; K. The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this legislation and this Agreement are as follows: 1. Generation of municipal revenue; 2. Construction of public infrastructure facilities; Ord~/94-'~ 1 2 3. Enhancement of the quality of life, including recreation facilities for present and future residents of the City; 4. The opportunity for an adjacent residential-commercial project creating significant job opportunities, sales tax and ad valorera tax revenues for the City; 5. Payment of Public Facilities Fees (fire and traffic signal mitigation); 6. Participation in special assessment districts to finance City and regional infrastructure improvements; and, 7. The creation of significant park and recreation dedications for public use and the protection of significant natural resources. Section 2. APPROVAL. This Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Attachment "3" is hereby approved. The Mayor is authorized and directed to evidence such approval by executing this Agreement for, and in the name of, the City of Temecula; and the City Clerk is directed to attest thereto; provided, however, that this Agreement shall not be executed by the City until this Ordinance takes effect and the City has received from the applicant two executed originals of said Agreement. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. Tt~.e City Clerk shall certify to the adoption 'of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Orals/94-31 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-31 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the llth day of October, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 18th day of October, by the following roll call vote: 3 COUNCILlvIEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz June S. Greek, City Clerk Ords;94-3 1 5 ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Walcott Corridor improvements, Project No. PW94-10, Rancho California Water District Funding Request RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council deny the request by Rancho California Water District to use City funds to relocate an existing waterline within existing street right-of-way. BACKGROUND: The City has begun the design process on the Walcott Corridor. The project includes grading and paving for interim two (2) lane road on Walcott Lane, Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos and Nicolas Road. During the preliminary planning and alignment stages of the project it was determined that portions of Walcott Lane would have to be lowered to provide for vehicle site distance. This vertical grade change will require underground utilities to be relocated. Subsequently Rancho California Water District (RCWD) was contacted to give them the option of including the necessary pipeline relocation work with the road improvement plans.. RCWD has requested that a portion of the pipeline relocation cost be considered in the overall road project being funded by the City. RCWD recognizes that utilities have a subordinate right to the public right-of-way, however they believe that those constituents deriving the benefit of the project should pay for the facilities. The pipeline on Walcott Lane was recently constructed and the cost to relocate it is approximately S585,000of which approximately $195,000are considered new improvements to be constructed at the new connection of Watcott Lane and La Serena Way and would be funded by RCWD. The balance of 8390,000 is considered by RCWD as a cost to the road project and is requesting the City fund this construction. RCWD has been very cooperative in the coordination of previous City Capital Projects and is requesting consideration in developing a mutually beneficial agreement in the construction of the proposed road improvements. Legally, all public utilities which are located within the public right-of-way and do not have prior rights must be relocated when they conflict with project being performed by the City. -1- r:\agdrpt~94\1018\pw94-10.egn/ajp RCWD is requesting release from that section of the code. This release could set a precedent for future City projects by significantly increasing the cost and preparation time for each City project. It should also be anticipated that other utilities will expect the same relief. FISCAL IMPACT: The Walcott Corridor is included in the Capital Improvement Program and is being funded by Measure A Funds, The request by RCWD would add approximately $390,000to the overall cost of the project. Attachment: Sketch -2- r:\agdrpt\94\l 018\pw94-10.agnlajp N .i,//// ~I. :..==i T. / I / / La;Serena \ SCOPE OF WORK: Existing 30" Waterline to be removed and relocated to f'tnished grad~ Improvement Corridor ~fnr,,g Walcott Lane. ~roj~-ct by City of TCmecula SCOPE OF WORK: 500 feet of 30" iransmission main extended to La Serena. JuLy 1 ,-, 1994 Mr, Tim Setlet Director of Pub]ic Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 925~0-3606 SUBJECT: Walcott Corridor lmprovcmems, PW 94-10 Dear Tim: In response to Don Spagnolo's letter regarding the subjec~ project, our staff presented a funding request to Rancho California Water District's (RCWD) Engineering and Operations Committee to relocate the District's 30-inch Walcott lane waterline, Staff, however, was unsuccessful in acquiring the Committee's recommendation for the project. We wcrc specifically directed by the Cornmince to request the City of Tcmccula (City) share in the cost of the pipcline relocation. RCVv'D recognizes that technically our utilities have a subordinate right for use of tb.r, public fight-of-way to that of public access. However, since both the City and RCWD are paying for these improvemenU w/th taxpayers' funding, we believe those constituents deriving the benefit of the project should pay for the facilities. In this ~ase, RCWD customers in the Rancho Division already paid to install and upsize the permanent facilities in Waicott Lane. The City's boundaries only comprise approximately one-third of the Rancho D~sion and we do not feel it is appropriate to charge constituents outside City boundaries [or the cost of a City project. We have estimated the tom] cost of thh facility at $585,000, Of the total, approximately $195,000 are expenses attributed to new improvements or addiiional pipeline which would be appropriate to be funded by our Rancho Division property owners. RCWD believes the remainder should bc considered an expense of the City's improvement project and therefore included within the G~s funding. RCWD has attempted to cooperate with the City in each of your public improvements which affect ex/sting or near*future facilities. We have enjoyed your cooperation in developing appropriate facility financing in the past and look forward to a favorable resolution to this situation. Mr. Tim Serlet/City of Tem~cula July II, 1994 Page Two Thank you for agreeing to meet with us on July 12. I have enclosed a map which shows RCWD's divisions and the City boundaries. RCWD would appreciate your earliest consideration of our request and plan to schedule this i~m at a near-future CiW Council raceling. Sincerely, RA.N'CHO CALIFORNIA WA~"ER DISTRICT E. P. "Bob" Lemons, P.E, Director of F. ngineering l~ncimurr. s (2) RCW'D Engineering & Operations Committee Members Joiln Hermigar, General Manager ':,ew Brannon. Development Enlinetring Manage: f 2 4 Sheet of. .ENGINEERING & OPERATIONS 2 June 22, 1994 Item No. Date RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Engineering and Operations Commitre¢ recommend that the Finance and Audit Committee and the Board of Directors approve the expenditure of $585,000 to remove and relocate the 30-inch transmission Iine in Walcott Lane and to enter into a utility construction agreement with the City of Temecula for project administration. The proposed funding source is the Rancho DMsion Nickel Replacement Fund. i ~ // // Cmlle / along Walcott Lane. City of Temeeffia 8COI~'E OF tYORK: sea feet transmisslan main extended to ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Joe Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Traffic Signalization Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the report and address any questions to staff. BACKGROUND: There are several traffic signal installations proposed, in the design stage or under construction. City Council requested that the status of each of these projects be updated and agendized. REPORT: Traffic Sianal at Winchester Road (Hw¥. 79N) and Nicolas Road City Council awarded the contract to Paul Gardner Corporation at the August 9, 1994 council meeting. The project is for the construction of a temporary three-way traffic signal at the ~ntersection of Winchester Road (Hwy. 79N) and Nicolas Road. Permit by Caltrans has been issued. At the recent pre-construction meeting, Rancho California Water District (RCWD) announced that they have plans to install a 54" diameter water line in that intersection. This will delay the project, since the installation of the water system would cut the loops. The delivery of poles for the project is estimated at fourteen (14) weeks. The installation of the 54" diameter waterline is estimated to take five (5) months or longer. Traffic Siqnal Modification at Rancho California Road and Front Street City Manager approved the contract with the lowest responsible bidder, Paul Gardner Corporation on August 24, 1994. The project includes the installation of new loop detectors and striping to provide a dual left turn lane from south bound Front Street to east bound r:~drpt\94\lO18\signal.rpUajp Rancho California Road. A pre-construction meeting was conducted on September 13, 1994 and the contractor is expected to start work on October 17, 1994. Traffic Sional and Vehicle Pre-Emption Installation The bid opening was on August 19, 1994 and staff is reviewing the proposed "equal" equipment of the supplier as proposed by the low bidder. The project includes the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Pre-Emption equipment at four (4) signalized intersections and Vehicle Emergency Pre-Emption equipment on nine (9) Fire Department vehicles. Traffic Siqnal at Marearita Road and Avenida Barca On May 1 O, 1994 the plans and specifications were returned to Caltrans for their review. The plans and specifications have since been approved by Caltrans. The request for authorization to go to bid on this project is on your agenda for this evening. Traffic Sianal at Solana Way and Maraarita Road This signal, when installed will be a temporary installation, to be later removed and replaced at its ultimate location. Proposal to utilize previously salvaged equipment located at the yard is being evaluated by the staff, and if feasible, will be submitted to Caltrans for their consideration and approval. Traffic Sianal at I-15 Offramp and HwV. 79 South Recent installation of stop signs on Hwy, 79 South at that location attracted much attention. Based on my discussion with Caltrans, it is my understanding that the installation of this system is approximately eighteen (18) months to two (2) years away. FISCAL IMPACT: None ITEM 18 APPROVA~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI E CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: .~.~_.~_. DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 "No Parking" on Palma Drive and Vallejo Avenue across from the Rancho Community Church PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer ~v' RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council reject the request to create a "No Parking" zone on the west side of Palma Drive and the north side of Vallejo Avenue across from the Rancho Community Church. BACKGROUND: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed this item at both their March 24, 1994 and September 22, 1994 meetings. At both meetings the Commission unanimously voted against the establishment of the proposed "No Parking" zones. Palma Drive is a 24 foot wide paved roadway centered in the City's 60 foot right-of-way creating 18 feet of unimproved parkway on both sides. Vallejo Avenue is also a 24 foot wide paved roadway centered in the City's 66 foot right-of- way creating 21 foot parkways on both sides except adjacent to Rancho Community Church. The church has added 12 feet of pavement with curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to their facility which accommodates for on street parking. Parking is currently allowed on all other areas of both streets as long as vehicles park completely off of the pavement, in the parkways. This area is depicted on Exhibit "A". This site was studied during church services on Sunday to determine if any particular hazards currently exist. Exhibit "B" reflects the parking scenario observed. Although sufficient parking is provided on-site, approximately 30 drivers choose to park along Vallejo Avenue adjacent to the existing sidewalk and along the east side of Palma Drive. Staff also observed a string line placed at the edge of pavement adjacent to the parcel across from the church. This was r:\agdrpt\94\1018Wallcjo.r~j/ajp placed by the resident to preclude motorists from parking in the City right-of-way (parkway) because the parkway in this area has been landscaped and irrigated by the adjacent property owner. Many residents landscape the parkway in front of their residences but also allow overflow parking to use it for parking if needed. The parkway is also provided for emergency parking for disabled vehicles. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission feels there is no reason to restrict parking for overflow parking demand potentially created for a four (4) hour period each week. Other residents maintain landscaping in our parkways without restricting parking. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Exhibit "A" 2. Exhibit "B" r:~agdrpt\94\lO18Wallejo,r~j/ajp \\\ \\\ , -j x LJ ITEM 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI ER CITY MANAGE(~ .\ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Herwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager October 18, 1994 Pro and Con Presentations on Propositions 186 and 187 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council allow the invited speakers, both pro and con, to address Propositions 186 and 187 before the City Council. BACKGROUND: At the Meeting of September 13, 1994, the City Council requested that speakers representing Propositions 186 and 187 be invited to address the Council and audience at e future City Council meeting before the November elections. The Council directed that representatives of the issues be given five minutes per side to represent both sides of the issues. The City Manager's Office is in the process of finaiizing speakers on the propositions, and will provide the Council with names as soon as possible. FISCAL ANALYSIS: There is no direct impact to the City to provide this type of forum. ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Joe Kicak, Director of Public Works October 18, 1994 Contract Award - Preparation of Santa Margarita Watershed Plans - Districts I and III PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: Oppose the award of contract and authorize the Mayor to forward a letter to the District Board of Directors of Regional Parks and Open Space. BACKGROUND: you under separate cover. JSG The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Contract Award - Preparation of Santa Margarita Watershed Plans - District I and III RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council oppose the award of contract and authorize the Mayor to forward a letter to the District Board of Directors of Regional Parks and Open Space. BACKGROUND: At their meeting on August 16, 1994,the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County authorized requesting proposals for the preparation of the Santa Margarita River Watershed Plans - District I and District Ill. Property Owners Rights Group of Murrieta Creek met on October 12, 1994with five members of Santa Margarita Watershed Policy Committee present. The major concern is the series of actions that have occurred without the input from the Property Owners Rights Group, Santa Margarita Watershed Policy Committee, City of Murrieta, City of Temecula and the Riverside County Flood Control. The "Request for Proposal" (RFP) indicates that Cities of Murrieta and Temecula are among those joining resources to establish the proposed plans and/or programs. The statement is of great concern to the Property Owners Rights Group, as well as City of Temecula. The fact is, that Request for Proposal with specific tasks was circulated without the benefit of review by some of the effected agencies and/or groups, including this City. The proposals for the Watershed Plans have been received, consultant selected and the contract award is scheduled for the Board Meeting of October 26, 1994. The total funding available for this project is in the amount of $320,000, of which $270,000 is provided by a grant from Coastal Conservancy, $10,000 from First and Third Supervisorial District, $20,000 from County of San Diego and $20,000 from the Nature Conservancy. -1- r:\agdrpt\94\1018\watershed.agn/ejp The objective of the Property Owners Rights Group of Murrieta Creek is to delay the award of contract for the plans and request the Regional Park and Open Space District Boards (Board of Supervisors) to: 1. Not award the contract for plans at their meeting of October 26, 1994. Circulate the RFP, for which the successful consultant was selected, to all the effected agencies. Allow these agencies time to review and comment on the scope of work for the plans, and provide comments to the General Manager of the Regional Park and Open Space District. Since the issue is of local, as well as regional significance, potential long range impacts, it is important that City Council comment and authorize the expression of concern on this matter on behalf of the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: None -2- r:\agdrpfi94\1018\watershed.agn/ajp ITEM 2 1 CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council J. Sal Mufioz, Councilmember October 11, 1994 The County' s Lack of Seriousness in Considering City of Temecula Input In the first week of October 1994 I was contacted by some individuals in the valley and Temecula sphere. They were concerneel about the Borel Airpark Specific Plan (documentation attached) because of the significant amount of traffic projected to be g~nerated by that project. These individuals asked whether the City of Temecula had an opportunity to review the plan and comment on the impact such a project would have on our community. I indicated that I was not aware of the details of such a project and, additionally, was not aware of the significant trip generation it would cause. However, I did feel it was important for the City Council to have an opportunity to at least look at the project, examine whatever mitigation had been proposed by County staff, and add any additional comments and/or concerns with respect to mitigation. I subsequendy sent a letter to Supervisor Ceniceros (attached) requesting a 30 day continuance on the pending agenda item to give the City of Temecula an opportunity to look at this issue. I also became aware that the City of Murrieta had similar interests and concerns and that they corresponded with Supervisor Ceniceros in a similar fashion. I made foilow up phone calls to the Supervisor's office further explaining the desire to have this issue continued and communicated with Gary Thornhi/l, our Planning Director, to ask what he knew about the project. Apparently, Mr. Thornhill had not received much, if any, input from County staff on this project and, thus, he was not completely aware of the circulation issues raised by the project. I also asked one of the individuals who contacted me initially regarding this project to appear on my behalf in the afternoon session of the October 4th Board Meeting further emphasizing my desire to bring this issue before this Council which she did. In spite of my efforts, and apparently the City of Murrieta's efforts as well, the Board of Supervisors on a 4 to 1 vote (Supervisor Buster being the only negative vote) rejected our request for a continuance and moved forward on the agenda item. My concern is that we Mayor and Members of the City Council October 11, 1994 Page 2 appear to have a continuing pattern df disregard or lack of concern on the part of the Board for our interests and the impacts that County pwjects have on the respective communities of Temecula and Murrieta. This is the sentiment that is expressed and confirmed by our own staff and which I believe many of our local elected officials have experienced at one time or another. I believe it is important for us to discuss the seriousness of this attitude on the part of County staff and the Board and address it in the strongest manner possible. We are no longer stepchildren of Riverside County and I, for one, do not believe that the interests of this valley should take a back seat to any other jurisdiction's interests. It is for this reason that I have placed this item on the City Council Agenda and I would like us to fully explore the nature of the problem and have unanimous Council reaction and communication to the Boaxd that this type of consideration, or lack thereof, will no longer be tolerated. I believe we ought to request very frank input from our own staff on how we should deal with this issue. JSM: ss Attachments cc: R. Bradley J. Greek G. Thornhill P~OBLDI; T~e Airport Business Park (Specific Plan No. 265) wtll introduce 107,000-I13,000 ~ (avoraqe da~ly ~c~e U~) ~ ~a road oys~ OE ~e Murrieta and fem~u~a tree. NO SPECIFIC DATA AVAILABLE ON SPECIFIC XNPACT2 to Mufflers end TeNcull area in Eli end Airport Conunity Trtnspor~:et4on Study (ACTS) l~lich the County Feltel on, SO C~AZN OFF-S~TZ IMPROV~NDITS County has relied on inadequate mechanism (1) BW Road end Bridge lenegtt: District (2) Assessment DlS~rtc~ 161 (3) Improvements cond£tioned to other projects eloh ely or may not be built in future AREA TAXPAYERS MAY NEED TO PAY YO~ TRAFFIC INPROVI~XNTI Project provides t:~e C0un~y will libels revenue over ~s ~lfe o~ ~e ~oJ~ so ~ little will be available ~or tmp=~vmn~a I~OULQ o~er ~hanlsms ~all CITY BUSINISS AREAS WTLL Ir- CONGESTID ,~ T~AFFIC MAY BZ FACILITATED, BUT QUALITY OF LIFE WILL SUrFJR Do ~as current residents of area want W live aside= this much =raffio? Winchester between Ines and Mer~ari=a tc have 94,00O ADTS up from the ourrent 14,0OO ADYS. ~OLUTION2 { DOCUMENT SPECIFIC OFF-SITI FROJECT IMPACTS got planning purposes. R~PLAC~ PROJICT CO!gr~RCZAL AREAS WITH INDUSTRIAL AND OFFIC! AR~AS to reduoe pro~ect Eo 8o,OO0 ADTS. Plealed indus~rial use produces 8S AIYr2 and offioe 132 ADTS, whereas commercial pr~u~l m~r, than 423 per acre. CONDITION pROJeCT TRAFFIC IA'V2LI TO A LiVE TO B] AC~OMNODAT~D AT LEVEL OF SEaVIOl C A8 COUNTY GBN]~ PLAN REQUIRES. Require tmlecommu~ing sehedulee, rideshiring lion; with pro~ect downscalinq and eliminar~Ln; at copieroil1 areas. RX~UIR! SPECIFIC OFF-SITE ROAD IMPRGAFD~XNT2 A2 CONDITION ELIMINATS pRedICT AREAS TKAT WrLL BE PURCHASE FOR AIRPORT EXPANSION. October 3, 1994 Page 2 As a final note, I would suggest that this Specific Plan is an example of an opportunity for greater mitigation contribution to Assessment District 161 based on its impact to the infrastructure contemplated by A.D. 161. I would greafiy appreciate your consideration of the above. I will be more than happy to discuss this issue with you by phone at your convenience. Very truly yours, ~_ '~,~ Councilmember JSM:ss co: Ron Bradley Jeannie Gillin COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT REVXE~ '1~ ~ PI~FI' Bt , 9~ REz Specific Plan No. 265 (Borel airpark Center) The Transpor~ation Department has reviewed the'traffic study sutMmttted by Robert Kahn, John Kain and Associates for the above referenced project. The study has been prepared in accordance with accepted traffic engineering standards and practices, utilizing County approved guidelines. We generally concur with the findings relative to traffic impacts. The study indicates 't, hat it is possible to achieve a Level of Service 'C* for the following intersections (some of which will require additional construction for mitigation at the time of development): Winchester Road/Scott Road Winchester Road/Keller Road Winchester Road/Pourroy Road Winchester Road/Thompson Road Winchester Road/Benton Road Winchester Road/Aul= Road Winchester Roed/Borel Road Winchester Road/Murrie=a Hot Springs Road Pourroy Road/Auld Road Leon Road/Ben=on Road Leon Road/Auld Road Pourroy Road/Thompson Road Pourroy Road/Benton Road (north and south) The Comprehensive General Plan policies relative to the Southwes~ Area Community Plan (SWAP) require a minimum of Level of Service °D' for peak hour operations. As such, the proposed project is consistent with this General Plan policy. The conditions of approval are as incorporated into =he final specific plan appendices: follows, and shall be document and necessar~ CONDITIONS OF ~PPROV~t The project proponent shall participate in the Traffic Signal Hitigation Program as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Specific Plan No. August 27, 1992 Page 2 265 An application to each road listed below shall be prepared by the pro~ect proponent to amend the Public Pacllities and Services Element of ~he Comprehensive General Plan: a. Ex~end ~on Road from Auld Road to Thompson Road as a Ma~or (100' right-of-way). b. ~lign Thompson Road as a ~a~or (100' r£ght-of-way) to intersect Winchester Road at a ninety degree angle and =o continue northwesterly as an ercension of Briggs Road· c. Extend Auld Road northerly from Winchester Road to Clinton Keith Road as a Major (100' right-of-way) and from Clinton Keith Road to Briggs Road as a Secondary (88' right-of-way). The above realigned roads shall be in conformance with the Airport Community Traffic Study (Ac~s). All roads shall be improved per the recommended General Plan desigua=ion, as approved by the County Board of Supervisors. The proposed project will be a substantial traffic attractor/generator. As such, the project proponent shall incorporate such demand managemen~ programs as may be appropriate to comply with the goals and objectives of the Regional Mobility Plan, Air Quality Management Plan, and Congestion Management Program, including: a. The establishment of a Transportation Management Association (TMA). b. The provision of on-site/off-site .Park and Ride Pacilities. c. Design provisions to accommodate transit services. All as approved and confirmed by the Transportation Depa~nt. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the project proponent shall consul~ with and obtain clearance from the following agencies to assure compliance and coordinate with =he Regional Mobility and Air Quality Management Plans and Congestion Management Program: CalTrans, District 8. The South Coast Air Qualit~ Management District (SCAQMD). The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC). Specific Plan No. 265 August 27, 1992 Page 3 Confirmation of such contact and. coord'lnation shall be provided to the Riverside County Transportation Department. The project shall be consistent with the February 19, 1992 118,645' trips per day as the maximum trip generation. The applicant shall fnsure that the trip reduction mad TDM measures are implemented, as needed to satisfy this requirement. The project shall establish a Development Monitoring Program es outlined in the attached outline. The Development Monitoring Program shall track the developments through approval and construction within the boundaries of Specific Plan 265, to ensure that the trip ceiling imposed upon the overall specific plan is not exceeded· Once a project has been approved, the total number of trips It generates shall be subtracted from the trip ceiling or trip bank, leaving a total of remaining trips that the specific plan can generate. For tract maps, final map recordation will be when ~he projects' generated trips will be deducted from the trip bank. The Transportation Department will maintain the official "trip bank' for the specific plan and provide periodic updates on project trip status~ Additional interim reports can be generated for a nominal fee to whoever requests one in writing. Prior to the approval of any project within the boundaries of the Specific Plan, the applicant shall establish and obtain Board of Supervisors approval of a Transportation Management Association· The TMA shall be responsible for implementing specific measures as to how the project in tends to guarantee that the trip ceiling of 118,645 per day placed upon Specific Plan 265 shall not be exceeded. All employees within the boundaries of the Specific Plan shall be required to participate in the TMA. The TMA shall provide an annual update regarding TDM activities and trip generation rates. A fee of $5,000 shall be paid to the Transportation Department to set up the monitoring program of the TMA. The TMA shall pay an annual maintenance fee of $2,500 to the Transportation Department for ~he life of the association. Additionally, the Specific Plan 265 August 27, 1992 Page 4 fee can be adjusted during the life of the project if necessary end the adjustment shall be t~ed to the consumer price index. LT:FC:ck c~z Russ Garret= K~in/Kahn & Assoc. A~tachment R~VERSIDE COUNT! TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TEE DEVELOPMENT MONITORING PRCM3RAM FOR TRAFFIC IMPACTS FOR r-;: ~ SPECIFIC PLAN NO. · .~,~, . (TRIP CEILINGS) ( S AMPLE ) 2'~E DF('KLOP]4ZF~ MO!i~TORTNG PROGRAM FOR TRA.u'FIC :F. XPACTS FOR IP~:CTP'ZC PLAN The Development Monitoring Program shall be an on-going informational process. Its purpose is to establish a formal procedure whereby the Riverside County Transportation Department can collect and ass{m~late data regarding-proposed development within the area covered by Specific Plan No. , which was approved by the Board of Supervisors on · The program shall remain in force until full build-out of the specific plan occurs, or may terminate sooner if the Director of Transportation determines it is no longer necessary. The parties who will be involved in the development monitoring program will be: 1. Any entity, public or private, which from time to time proposes to develop any portion of the property i luded under the jurisdictio~ of Specific Plan No. TheWent of the involvement of the developer entities shall be limited to those items/articles identified in these procedures, and s~n~ll commence only by the presentation of an active development plan to Riverside County, in which case the developer shall be responsible for preparing and submitting this document to the Riverside County Transportation Department. Th~ Riverside County Transportation Department, shall maintain current records and information submitted by developer entities during the program. The County shall make this information available to all participants of the program upon written request. The Development Monitoring Program shall accomplish its intended purpose with regards to traffic impacts by requiring that each development proposal within the specific plan boundary prepare a traffic impact study. The s~udy shall be prepared using the most current traffic study guidelz~es adopted by the County. The study shall contain but is not limited to the following: 1. Information regarding the type of development. 2. Specific data sufficient for the Transportation Department to readily evaluate the cumulative impact(s} of the proposal· 3. Clariflcation of the proposal's conformshoe to the specific plan. Clarification of whether the proposed traffic facilitles are in substantial agreement with the pertinent elements of the specific plan approved for the area. 1 · 10. In general, 'the traffic impact study should compile-as much information as possible regarding the facilities within the development proposal, including an analysis of the impact on regional transportation facilities in the area. The traffic engineer's determination of the cumulative existing and committed traffic impaet and levels of service at all intersections and roadway links, Prior to consideration of the development increment in question. The cumulative impact will include all those developments which have received approval for development. . The traffic engineer's determination of the cumulative existing traffic impact and levels of service at all affected intersections and roadway lines includin~ the proposed development added to existing conditions as defined above. This will present the actual effect of the subject development and reflect an accurate determination of the traffic impact. Address the trip rate ceiling placed on the specific plan, if applicable· Address TDM measures proposed by this development, and a method of implementation, as well as overall TDM measures proposed by the specific plan itself and how this project is contributing towards achieving those measures· Address the feasibility of a teleconumuting center withi~.,the proposed development. .~o': THE TRAFFIC IMPACT MONITORING PROGRAM The inputs to the process shall consist of: A Traffic Impact Study RePort to be filed on each requiring subsequent County approval ni t tentative tract map, or land use approvals· Information relating to traffic improvements within the specific plan area, whether public or private, will be maintained on file by the Riverside County Transportation Department. This information will be available to participants of the monitoring program. Annual update of ground counts at specified locations agreed upon by the developer and all developers constructing projects within the specific plan. II. The OUtPUts from the process~wi11 consist 0f: A composite Plan of the specific plan area will be provided to the Transportation Department to identify which portions of land have been processed through the monitoring program. A copy of this plan will be available to participants of the program when initiating a new development proposal. The Composite Plan shall be* supplied to the Transportation Department by the property owner at 1' - scale, and will accurately show the following items as identified in the specific plan: ae proposed street locations, including right-of-way widths; b. drainage facilities (existing and proposed); c. existing street improvements; d. street facilities are required by the specific street facilities which are already reuuired by other development proposals, but construction is not yet guaranteed; street facilities to be ~ui~. by the propose~..,~ development submittal; .~.:.. ..:~;.. g. transit routes, proposed and existing; TDM measures for the specific plan, implemented and proposed, and in which program this project is participating or implementing (i.e., talecommuting sites, park and rides, commuter rail and station location); i. Trip ceiling and trips generated. III. The cycle of activity in the traffic impact monitoring process is as follows: As a Dro~ect or development DroDosal with the specific plan area is initiated, the Transportation Department will make the determination as to whether or not the formal monitoring process is applicable· If it is, then the following steps will proceed: The Transportation Department provides the applicant with the printed guidelines for the monitoring program with one copy of the composite map (if available) and the 3 required standard impact report guidelines for traffic studies. If this project is the first development within the boundaries of the specific plan, then the developer shall be required to prepare the composite map. The applicant completes the appropriate reports with professional engineering input to identify allpertinent aspects of the development proposal· This draft report, accompanied by supporting technical data is submitted for review to the Transportation Depar~nent. The Transportation Department reviews the draft for completeness and content and returns connnents to the applicant. At this point, the Transportation Department's review is only preliminary, and conformshoe with the connnents returned will establish only approval of the concept proposed by the applicant. The Transportation Department's comments may very well contain a request to gather further information or to more specifically identify mitigation to a knowndeficiency, in which case, an amended draft review would be required. After the applicant has received concurrence from the Transportation Department on the scope of improvements to be included within the development proposal, the Transportation Department will issue a letter identifying such and the applicant will proceed with proceed with the development review,process in the no.rm~amnner. As an atta&hment to the subsequent development plan submittal to the County, the applicant will supply a final impact report which will reflect the precise character of the development proposal as approved. It should be noted that the monitoring process is intended to enhance communication with the County during development phasing within'the specific plan area. The applicant's statements contained in the impact reports, as well as the County's letter of concurrence, both are to be regarded as intentions rather than binding commitments. The final impact report will be arriving at the Transportation Department at the same time as the detailed development plan submittal. Only then will all the required information be available for Transportation Department review on the development which may lead to modifications of subjects covered in the preliminary impact reports· 4 Upon approval of the development proposal, the applicant will update the composite map to reflect the area being developed, designating which improvements to street facilities ere planned, which.are conditions of approval for various projects~ which are guaranteed by bonding or other forms of security, and which are actually constructed. 5 BOULDE.-~'$ BOI~ TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE November in 1989, the Bouttar City Council estlblilhed the 0 AimmaUve Transportmien Can. mr with the objective of ~ tran!l}ortlng Boulder re~iclen~, out {3ftheir auramot}lie. ir~o altemltive model. The Bollicier Transpo.'~tlon Master T Y P.~ '.. revlmsd in 1989, taclulma a 1B per~enl reduetl=n in~ } angle occupanc'y vttqlr, tel tmvlling within Boilclef ey 2010. to help improve air quality and raducl t~lnsportatien congestion in the Denver region. under me federal Chain Air Act. OUi ' OF Denvii' il I oreben monoxfde non-ltt~nment erea In lggl, me AltomaiNe Transportation Center clqangad its name to GO BOULDER (for Gem Options In TranlpQrtmlan) to emphlml~ t~ idea ef moving people not only physimlly througrl the city =m toward a new undlrttandlng of tanspor'~tlon planning and e, ommunity cl~velol~mant, in 1992, th8 rnlln goals are to cram awIranams afthe GO BOULDER programs anci insmass tiqe usa of alternative tr~napoffation, e~peciaily transit. wnpools, bieyelmt, and The old mtndby, two healthy f~et. In 'abase four rnode~, GO BOULDER or}ermte~ extremely successful programs designed to meet its MIster Plan targets. Trar~it: GO BOULDER use the bus system end rideshating tO rno~m pedDle to work in an organized yet relied manner. The yenpool program Is errlnged for I:)y mutual agreement of the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG), GO BOULDER and Special Transit. a private non-profit organi,tltion larovlding transportatIOn for the aidarty ann disabled. Planning fc}r the Dragram arced in mid-leG1, and it Is now operated I~y the DRCOG. through RideArmncJerL a ride-matching p gram fa~the entire Denver region. GO BOULDER Dutchsled the vans and Spasial T~Tl~it maimins them. Under an elaDoram funding schedule, aid vsrts zre sold when they reach half their depreciation vllue Ina the money C'~rnlDinlCi ~ ~e vanl3aQI feels to perchell new vans for GO 80ULDER. Initial funding for the van;got program c~ne from the old Federal Air~ ta Urban Systems (FALLS) ~rogrlm, now mpim~d by the Su~l Tr&nspo~On Program (S~) of The I~o~11 Su~ T~po~mlon Efficien~ A~ of 199~ (IST~). FAUS ~nds ~ad t~dffionally bean use~ ~r I~et pmje~: the ~aol program meted ~eir first use i~ CoteredO for rideshating prograil. ='.' far the most suecess"/t;l and Innovative transit program is the ECO Pass. a bus piss i~mgrlm, started in Souldot an the Ml:llility Pass. which encourages businesses to subsidize transrc instead of parking and targets infrequent and normally non-t}us rising employees. T~parho~pate in the ECO Pans program, employers buy annual bus passes for all of tP, elr employees. The rates am graciua~ed. st $20, $3-~, or $65 a year per employee. delveriding en the level of bus mice at the I~usiness location. To encourage participatian, GO BOULDER reimburses employers ,~p to 25 percent of the coat for me first year, based Qn the ISle of the cc}mplrty. The ben~ts for both emplOyiN and ampleyea ~rastly outweigh these ccst~. EmphDyees receive unlimited bul use throughout the Denver six*county r'~ion. In addition, they am assured a ride home ~mugh ~e Guaranteed Ride Home Program available far beth the ECO Plu and RidaArrsnears programs. In the case of ~n unpllnnecl emergesoy dunng the {~ay, ECO Pass holders can grab a taxi, free of charge. by showincJ their pass. Far employers, 1he ECQ Pass program Is a fully tax deduclible transportation service. mueh cheaper then laqDInding peking lets. The ECO Pass sots as I bandit to lure prolpeclNa amp~cryee. I~uilds favorable rel~tons between employers and employees, and provides mattWe evidence of the ¢ompany's environmental commitment, Employeel also arrive to work on time. raisecol, and ready tO put in a full dey's worK. In the first ten months of the EC0 Pass program, mor~ than 350 businesses employing over 18,000 peonale have signed up. New hue ridership has increased an average of 21 pareant. These ralulta am fn}m a Regional Tmspormtion District (RTD) study of - partici!}stjn~}' employers with 25 employees or more. Area employers such as fie Boulder Community Hospital (BC:;H) wholeheartedty praise the E:O Pass ~rogmm and GO BOULDER itself. The rICH program was organized by Joe ivIoDonald, Vlce President for Finesse. Me. Donald says the GO BOULDER program provides the toatl and stimulus nameled fOr a aucosssful alternative transportation program. The hoag}itel combines the program wit~t · cash-in-hind inctntlve to leave the ear at home. saving both the environment and parking {:am. During the 1992 Alternative Transportation Month, *,hi hospital saved an estimated 35,000 auto camsurer miles. GO BOULDER also star*-.ed a bus pass program far Cotorado University students ana staff. In 1991, the C.U. Students voted overwhelmingly to Day an ndditianel $q 0 in their stublent aclivity fee each sernemer in return for free bus service. With just a CU student !1:) card, rtudertm um get almost anywhert in the Denver area (althougi"l oar areas have a $I charge), thereby mine Time for e~b~. studying and asaing the perking oruncl~ Dn CarMpu~, An with tMe venpoot proGates, the stu,4ent Due peas and t~e ECO Pass prOgrains pay for themserves. The rams charged pa/ticipating empJoyens Borer thl revenue from ~.'..~ bus farm box Is well am sen/me, capital Costs and admffiiatmtt'..; costs. Bicycles: GO BOULDER oplrltll In ex-'-*.sjve syltlrtt of bike pathi end lanes to encourage safe end g-nvenient travel for both i=icycllsts end car <lrivers. The bicycle program is sul;Der~ed by the community. where an elated eight percent ~f employees in Boutclef (pop. 80,000) bike to worx. not including university students who average over 20 percent rideship- An annual eves since 1981, Bike Week grow out of fie city's Bike-to-Work day and evolved into · nine-day cele/Drmion elch July. Bike Week dram the l~srtic"ipation of araa complnies, bicycle c~ubl end ihopl. In 1992. el3proxlmltely 100 companies (up hm 16 the pr~qoul yelr) particil:ated in the "friendly" Boulder County Business Challenge, in which companies Compete for the highest percentage of riders. The winner was Valley Labs, a me~llcll ~tevtc8 manufacturing company. Out of g00 employees, 328 rode to work that Wednesday; nasty 10 Dimant of employees riga meir bike.. on a regular basis. VIilay Labs provide bike rm~ks and a full times center es well as offer alternative t~ansportltlon benefits Burr ea the vanpool program. I, lg92 mote then 7,000 DooDle rode to work on Bike-to-irk day, compared to 4.500 in 1991. Before 1990, no more thin 3,500 people rode ~eir =icy~ea in the annual event. GO BOULDER al~'[butea the growth m the hiring ~f a Bike Week coordinator and additional publiP.,ity end media attestion. Pedestrians: In the summer of 1991, GO BOULDER es~sse-.: ~ needs of pedestrians end fie costs of cepitaJ improvemant~ for pacleatnan and disabled accessibility. The goal of the pedestrian systlrnl plan il to repair existing sidewalks and addnile the safety ancl design conceal eftha community, rafter than c~nee.'.tcating on building new aidewalks in a random manner. Another part of the program builds and repairs ben~lqes at bus stops and shelters. GO BOULDER involves the community in its decisions about the pedestrian program and asks for suggestions through their n~wsle:'".r and adversemonte. GO BOULDER t~ orgentTjng the Pedestrian Safat'y Awareness Campaign .m the Boulder [:)epartment~ of Transportation, Prennlng and laolice. '/'his two--weal< pilot program in Oc"'mber 1992 will came awareness of IDaalsatian rights and responsibilities among 1~edestrian,,. motorists, and the general public BecIluae drivers in Boulder tend to be obtMoua to pedestrians, GO BOULDER ie e:merimenting with idez~s and strategies to prc;~'l people wlqo wIIk, including issuing moterim with r...~tetions for failing to yield at crosswalks and red lights. Pedestrian-, too, will be "pulled over" for jaywalking and other safety mfrm~ens. 3 This year GO BOULDER ia ptanrting the Fourteens intemeonat Pedestrian Conference for September 1993 GO ROULDEP,'s efforts to improve sad maintain its iD,,clestrien f'acilitJes hss earned the c~/a rankin8 emenO Walking Maaszine's Morn WallShie CZtlea. Alternative Tmnepertation Planning: ,'he City of Boulder Trinll~crmtion Mater Plan i~t~grates ,,11 medea into lhe tranloortetion !planning proell. Recently added to the M,,ster Plan is the Transit which bm3ame ,, allot foou,, for GO BOULDER in 1980 ~vhan the agency set up me Citizen's Transportation Aclvtson/Committee. This l~lan del3,,rts free traditional panning in its focus on crmrdng the demenct for transit first, then buiJding the physlell system in respc;nsetommdemand. Land-usel0mposalstneludethedevelopmentOfneighborhoed trarml:ortatjon ramera where l~i~/P. Jists, pecteslrlans and transit riders can sawrich mocl,,s easily. The Feeder, rain Master Plan, another addition to the Tamaberration Ma~ter conaollde~_- ell the existing documents riled to pedestrians me that other sgencl,,s and the community ¢an biter understand current pedum=trien proje~-'t=. Funding: · Funcling far most GO BOULDER l~rogram,, ames from the City TransOortmjon Fund well as stlte and ft<~ral moni~s, The exetgtions are programs such as ECC Pass whic, n partstipS:lag emplolmra pay me entire celt of the program, for transit saMca for all of their employee. The City Transponll~on Fund is baed on I local O.006 permat $1Jel tax and oourrty and state fundS. For ~e 20-year plan outlined in the Transportation Mastlr Plan, psiacted total fUnds react~ almost $350 million with the prOjected total costs ,,dding'up to approximately $330 million. Over the 20-year period, the I~edmstnan ayetern will ¢==t $7'.2 simon and the bicycle system, $13.4 million. Reprint. d from the "SURFACE I'RANOPORTATION POL|rf PROJECT RESOURCE GUIDE" Came Studies by Mery C~therine Snyder, 'the Envirenmental ExGhange 4 Jeannle ~illen · 381e0 ~kvenida La Cresta · A~urrleta, Ca. ~)2~e~ · (~(~) e77-~f~iS Septembor 29, 1994 Kay Ceniceros, Supervisor Riverside County Board of Supervisors 4080 Lemon Street, 14th Floor Riverside, California 92502-1359 RE: French Valley Development/Traffic Impacts Dear Kay, I have just been apprised of the French Valley plans for development and the impact that may have on the traffic situations on Winchester and in the communities of Murrieta and Temecula. Please see copies of my letters to both Sal Munoz (Temecula) and Kevin Walsh (Murrieta) attached hereto. It doesn't seem unreasonable (even at the llth hour) to request some kind of mitigation for this impact. For example, a small Task Force from the affected communities, to advise, monitor and make recommendations. This could be set up quickly and supported by the developers. I hope you will consider this or some idea to mitigate this terrific impact these developments will have on their surrounding communities. At this late date, I believe you are probably the only person who can initiate any action here. Yours truly, annie Gillen Jeannie (~illen · 381eo Avenlda ta Cresta · Murrleta, Ca. ~2~e~ · (~}ccj) eT/-8C28 September 29, 1994 d. Sal Munoz, Councilman City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula. Ca. 92509 Dear Sal, It has just been brought to my attention that the Borel Airport Business Park (Specific Plan No.265) along with other development in the French Valley, will introduce 113,000 average daily vehicle trips into the road systems of Temecula and Murrieta. You know me to be an advocate for the 'quality of life" here in the valley, and I am greatly concerned about this kind of traffic impact. Even though I live in the west hills, I work, shop and recreate in the Temecula/Murrieta Valley. This amount of traffic will (excuse the pun) DRIVE us all crazy, destroy our clean air and require massive road construction. I am told this impact is 10 times greater than that we currently live with, and I am told emissions will increase by 24-50%. I know you to be sensitive to the 'quality of life" and I know you have taken a special interest in transportation for your city and surrounding areas. What I don't know, is where or when the concerns over these impacts have been addressed by either the Temecula or Murrieta City Councils. It seems to me that these cities would want to be involved, and that some mitigation may be appropriate here. Shouldn't there be some very specific plans for alternate routes and alternate modes of transportation (including who will pay for them). Shouldn't there be some very specific limits on how much traffic you can accept with each approved project, and a way of monitoring that. Shouldn't we carefully review the amount of commercial and industrial designations we continue to allow, and consider ways a developer can help establish programs to mitigate the impacts. For exampte, a Transportation Task Force that could look at telecommuting, carpooling, employer credits for alternate transportation, etc. The city of Boulder, in Colorado has just implemented some very innovative transportation programs, and I suspect you have a great deal of knowledge in this new field oi' interest. Sal, this project is on the County Supervisors October 4th Agenda, and while it is not my desire to deny approval of this project, a 30 day delay could afford the opportunity for a Task Force to convene and prepare minimal, yet specific mitigation requests. If you share any of my feelings about this, please call Kay Ceniceros today at 275-1030, and ask for some time to explore this idea. I will hand carry a copy of this letter to her at her Riverside office on Monday, and I will be at the Board meeting on Tuesday. If there is anything I can do to assist, accomodate or expedite some action here, please don't hesitate to call on me. As always, I appreciate your sincere leadership and interest in the quality of life in the Temecula Valley. Yours truly, ie Gillen Jeanhie Cillen · 381ec Avenida La Cresta · Murrieta, Ca. ~)2~e2 · (~)Cc~) eT/-$C28 September 29, 1994 Kevin Walsh, Councilman City of Murrieta 26442 Beckman Court Murrieta, Ca. 92562 Dear Kevin, It has just been brought to my attention that the Borel Airport Business Park (Specific Plan No.265) along with other development in the French Valley, will introduce 113,000 average daily vehicle trips into the road systems of Temecula and Murrieta: You know me to be an advocate for the 'quality of life" here in the valley, and I am greatly concerned about this kind of traffic impact. Even though I live in the west hills, I work, shop and recreate in the TemeculaJMurrieta Valley. This amount of traffic will (excuse the pun) DRIVE us all crazy, destroy our clean air and require massive road construction. I am told this impact is 10 times greater than that we currently live with, and I am told emissions will increase by 24-50%. I know you to be sensitive to the 'quality of life" and concerned about the future of transportation in your city and the surrounding areas. What I don't know, is where or when the concerns over these impacts have been addressed by either the Temecula or Murrieta City Councils. It seems to me that these cities would want to be involved, and that some mitigation may be appropriate here. Shouldn't there be some very specific plans for alternate routes and alternate modes of transportation (including who will pay for them). Shouldn't there be some very specific limits on how much traffic you can accept with each approved project, and a way of monitoring that. Shouldn't we carefully review the amount of commercial and industrial designations we continue to allow, and consider ways a developer can help establish programs to mitigate the impacts. For example, a Transportation Task Force could look at telecommuting, carpooling, employer credits for alternate transportation, etc. The city of Boulder, in Colorado has just implemented some very innovative transportation programs. Kevin, this project is on the County Supervisors October 4th Agenda, and while it is not my desire to deny approval of this project, a 30 day delay could afford the opportunity for a Task Force to convene and prepare minimal, yet specific mitigation requests. If you share any of my feelings about'this, please call Kay Ceniceros today at 275-1030, and ask for some time to explore this idea. I will hand carry & copy of this letter to her at her Riverside office on Monday, and I will be at the Board meeting on Tuesday. If there is anything I can do to assist, accomodate or expedite some action here, please don't hesitate to call on me. As always, I appreciate your sincere leadership and interest in the quality of life in the Murrieta Valley. Yours truly, 37100 Los Alamos Road Murrieta, CA 92563 October 7, 1994 Dear Jeannie, Thank you for keeping the torch burning on this project. I talked to Steve Harding. He's not sure the C~ouncil feels strongly enough to put it on the agenda. I gave him the EIR and other documentation for his information. I'll try to speak to some Council members this morning before we go. Here are the names and number of people who live in Temecula and Temecula's Sphere of Influence who might be willing to come and speak at a Temecula City Council meeting this coming week. I gave them the fact sheet on the project and they said they were willing to write a letter and FAX it to the Board. When you talk to them, mention that I suggested you call and ask them to attend. Cindy Bush 677-8966 (cindy has other neighbors who might attend) Kathleen Eyserbeck 699-1972 - (Kathleen mentioned to me Steve Sanders of the Temecula Traffic Commission who~I never had a chance to call as another interested person) Pat Keller 677-0541 Judy DeForest 699-1328 Jane Verson of Bob Buster's office also mentionel~ a Dr. Robinson who has been concerned about French Valley development. I never got through to him. His office number of 695-1079. Rod Spriggs of Murrieta might be willing to come and speak - 677-3086 Casey Jurado of Murrieta works in Temecula and might be willing to speak as well - work number ~ 695-6895 If you need to get a message to me, you can leave it on my message machine. I call my machine periodically. Best, 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -~8 4 5 M. 6 this and other projects planned for the area by acknowledging that while difficult to address, they do exist and to provide information on these impacts so that the responsible decision making bodies are informed and can make appropriate decisions. During construction, traffic congeftion will occur due to the use of consU'uction vehicles and the placement of infrastnlcture within the rights-of-way of roads in the vicinity of the pwject. At buildout, the project will result in 14,090 average dally trips. It is anticipated that the intersection of Winchester Road/Mumeta Hot Springs Road will operate at level of service E due to cumulative impacts. It is anticipated that the intersections of Winchester Road/Benton Road and Winchester Road/Borel Road will operate at level of service D due to cumulative impacts. Stop signs shall be installed to control outbound traffic on all site access roadways. Cul-de-sacs shall not exceed 1,320 feet in length to facilitate emergency access. Pedestrian walkways shall be provided which separate pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. To accommodate cumulative development of the study area, the Winchester Road (Route 79) corridor shall be improved to an U~an Arterial Standard of 134' ROW. Roadway improvements recommended by the Wilbur Smith Traffic Study for the Southwest Area Community Plan shall be 16 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 N. implemented. The project shall l~n:icipate in the Airport Community Transportation Study (ACTS). In the event that ACTS is not completed, the project proponent shall submit a comprehensive study en,compassing study area build-out. The project shall comply with th~ conditions set forth in the Transportation Department letter dated October 5, 1993. Water and Sewer Services 1. hlll~A: The project will result in an incre~ed demand for both water and sewer services. Total buildout of the project is anticipated to produce an impact on a cumulative basis for water demand and water and sewer facilities for the area. Water consumption for the project will be approximately 2,54 million gallons per day. Waste water production for the project will be approximately 2, 12 million [~allons per day. 2. ]~jgalig, B: EMWD will provide water and sewer service to the project in accordance with master plans. All water facilities necessary for Category II projects shall be in place to service project residents. Landscaping irrigation systems shall be automatically contwlled. Drought tolerant vegetation shall be utilized for landscaped areas in accordance with the Landscape Guidelines. Water conservation techniques shall be integrated into the design of the proposed development. 17 AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK PROBLEM: The Airport Business Park (Specific Plan No. 265) will introduce 107,000-113,000 ADTS (average daily vehicle trips) to the road system of the Murrieta and Temecula area. NO SPECIFIC DATA AVAILABLE ON SPECIFIC IMPACTS to Murrieta and Temecula area in EIR and Airport Community Transportation Study (ACTS) relied on by County ACTS does show that Business Park with other development in French Valley will increase traffic on Winchester at Inez from 14,000 to 115,000 ADTS and on Los Alamos at Hancock near 1-215 from 10,000 to 85,000 ADTS. These figures do not include other projects -- Johnson Ranch, Buffman Project, and Specific Plans in Murrieta NO CERTAIN OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS County has relied on inadequate mechanisms (1) SW Road and Briedge Benefit District ~ successfully challenged in court and now being redone (2) Assessment District 161 - insufficient funds (3) Improvements conditioned to other project which may or may not be built AREA TAXPAYERS MAY NEED TO PAY FOR TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS Project provides the County with insufficient revenue over the life of the project to pay for improvements should other mechanisms fail DEVELOPER SEEKING PIECEMEAL SOLUTIONS Ray Borel has asked Murrieta to provide for extending Hunter Road from Winchester across Warm Springs Creek to Whitewood so that Business Park traffic may access 1-215 at Los Alamos thus promising to increase the already projected 85,000 ADTS to a higher volume. AIR QUALITY TO SUFFER Emissions in the area will increase by 24.8 to 50.3% CITY BUSINESS AREAS WILL BE CONGESTED. No specific data is available. The public needs to know exactly how. INTERSECTION TRAFFIC EXCEEDS COUNTY PLAN LEVELS OF D Murrieta Hot Springs and Winchester Road at Level E QUALITY OF LIFE WILL SUFFER Even if roads were widened to accommodate the traffic, do residents want to live amidst this much traffic and air pollution? SOLUTIONS: A delay in project approval until means to reduce traffic is worked out among Temecula, Murrieta and County. POSSIBLE MEANS (1) DOCUMENT SPECIFIC OFF-SITE PROJECT IMPACTS (2) SET A TRIP BANK CEILING TO AVOID IMPACTS (3) REPLACE PROJECT COMMERCIAL WITH INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE Planned industrial use produces 85 ADTS and office 132 ADTS an acre whereas commercial produces more than 423 an acre. (4) REQUIRE PROJECT TO ESTABLISH SPECIFIC TRIP REDUCTION MEASURES includihg - specific mapped Class 1 bikeways ~ including one along Hunter Road between Winchester and Whitewood, one along Los Alamos Road, one into Temecula, and one to Winchester. - telecommuting schedules (employees to work at home 2-3 days per week) - 4-day work week WE NEED A SOUTHWEST AREAIADVISORY TASK FORCE AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK The County Board of Supervisors will give final approval to the 780-acre industrial and commercial park around the French Valley Airport Tuesday, OCTOBER a. The project will add 107.000 DAILY VEHICLE TRIPS to the area's road system. Winchester Road between Ynez and. Margarita now with 14,000 vehicles per day will increase to as much as 94,000 daily trips. Los Alamos between Hancook and 1-215 now with 10,000 daily trips will increase to 85,000 daily trips from this and related projects. The project will increase EMISSIONS INTO THE AIR 25% TO 50% in our area. The County has required NO SPECIFIC OFF-ShTE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS for the project. It has not studied specific off-site impacts to identify improvements needed for this project alone. It relies on (1) Assessment District 161 for Winchester Road. now in financial difficulty, (2) Southwest Road and Bridge Benefit District, which was successfully challenged in court and is being revised, and (3) improvements from other projects that may not be built. LOCAL CITIES AND TAXPAYERS MAY HAVE TO PAY for road improvements. The project will not generate enough revenue to pay for them. The developer Ray Borel in a piecemeal effort to deal with the problems has asked Murrieta to support connecting Winchester Road to the Los Alamos/.I-215 intersection via an extension of Hunter Road across Warm Springs Creek to Whitewood Road on Murrieta's eastside. OTHER PROJECTS WILL PRODUCE MORE TRAFFIC. Quinta Do Lago approved by the County last December will add about 55,000 daily vehicle trips. Winchester 1800, denied by the County. Planning Commission, will add 113,000, if eventually approved by the County Supervisors. Johnson Ranch between French Valley and the Wine Country now under consideration by Temecula will produce 53,000 trips. The proposed Murrieta Highlands and Golden City plans in Mumeta will also add traffic to the area. Even if sufficient roads were m be built or widened with sufficient funds, DO WE WANT TO LIVE AMIDST THIS MUCH TRAFFIC AND AIR POLLUTION7 THERE IS STILL TIME TO BE HEARD: PLEASE WRITE A SHORT LETTER TO THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS asking for a short delay on final approval of the Airport Business Park, Specific Plan No. 265 until means to reduce the daily vehicle trips substantially can be included in the project. Community quality. of life interests have yet to be addressed. You might also ask that a Southwest Area Transportation Advisory Committee involving the County, Temecula, Mumeta, and local citizens and businesspeople be created to fred immediate, innovative, and specific ways to reduce traffic and air pollution from this and other projects. PLEASE FAX yot, r letter to RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS c/o Clerk of the Board - FAX # (909) 275-1071. Please refer to Agenda Item 3.23 a/b. Letters should be sent BY MONDAY. Call Rita Gentry at 677-6552 for more information. 'DEPARTMENTAL 'REPORTS APPROV · CITY ATTORNE~V,~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official-~- October 17, 1994 Building and Safety September 1994, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for September 1994: Building Permits Issued ............................................. 164 Building Valuation .......................................... $7,134,402 Revenue Collected .......................................... $73,726.65 Housing Starts .................................................... 44 New Commercial Starts ................................. 2 = 62,166 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations ......................... 11 = 13,677 Sq. Ft. Building Inspections ............................................. 2,430 V:\TONY\REPORTS~SEPT'94.RPT 10/4/94 tda Agenda Report October 17, 1994 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions .......................................... 227 Active Cases Pending ............................................. 94 Closed Cases .................................. Weed Abatement Posted (to date) .................... A. Number Abated by City ................. ................ 50 ................ 992 ................ 239 V:\TONY\REPORTS\SEPT'94.RPT 10/5/94 tda APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning DATE: October 18, 1994 SUBJECT: Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of September, 1994: Caseload Activity: The Department received eight (8) applications for administrative cases and four (4) applications for public hearing cases for the month of September as follows: Conditional Use Permits Extension of Time/Plot Plans Parcel Map - Schedule E - Sewers Revised Tentative Subdivision/After 2 years Total 4 Ongoing Projects: Old Town Streetscaoe Improvement Project: The consultant interviews for the West Main Street Demonstration Project are finished. EPT (Eriksson, Peters and Thomas) was the top rated firm. Contract negotiations are currently in progress. OId Town RedeveloDment Proiect: Staff continues to meet withZev Buffman and Gene Hancock. The remaining feasibility studies are expected to be completed in late October. Develooment Code: The Advisory Committee has completed its review of the Draft Code. A joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop to formally introduce a public hearing draft of the development code has tentatively been scheduled for November 3rd. A draft zoning map will also be presented at the workshop. · French Valley Airport: The ALUC is preparing responses to the City's comments on the DEIR for the Facility Master and the Comprehensive Land Use Plans. Nicolas Valley Special Study: The contract has been finalized. Council approval is expected in October. Temecula Reoional Center Soecific Plan and Environmental linDact Report: The Regional Center Specific Ran was approved at the July 18, 1994 Planning Commission meeting and continued by City Council to their meeting of October 1 lth 1994. The Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared for the Regional Center was certified by the City Council on July 13, 1992. CamDos Verdes Specific Plan and Environmental Impact RepOrt: The Campos Verdes Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were approved at the September 13, 1994 City Council meeting. Winchester Hills This Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report have been placed on hold by the applicant. Murdv Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: Applicant is in the process of responding to staff's comments on the Specific Plan. The Addendure to the EIR has been circulated for public review and the applicant is preparing the response to comments. After all of staff's concerns are addressed, this item will be scheduled for Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: The public review comment period for the EIR ended on August 29, 1994. At a workshop on April 25, 1994, the Planning Commission provided the applicant direction on the project. The applicant has continually been working with staff to address Planning Commission's concerns. Another workshop with the Planning Commission was held on July 18, 1994 where the applicant presented an amended Land Use Plan. Rorioauoh Ranch Specific Plan: Planning staff is preparing the Notice of Preparation to begin the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process. Staff held a Development Review Committee meeting with the applicants on Septemi~er 15, 1994 to discuss staff's general concerns with the project. The applicant has submitted the Specific Plan for staff's review. After reviewing the Specific Plan a Planning Commission date will be determined. Staff is reviewing the amended Specific Plan and negotiating on the Development Agreement. A tentative Planning Commission date has been set for December 5, 1994. Attachments: 1. Revenue and Status Repo~ - Page 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT REVPRIN2 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 4137 4138 4139 4140 4141 4142 4143 4144 4145 4146 16:28:02 GENERAL FUND PLANNZNG DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION MAPS REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~ONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INZTIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT GEOLOGY CEQA GEOLOGY ORD. 547 APZ LAFCO PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. MAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CONDO TRACT NAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK LOT LINE ADJUST, PLAN CHECK CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK COND. CERT, OF COMPL. PLN. CK. CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 170,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEPTEMBER REVENUE .00 .00 .00 352.00 3,046.00 .00 3,872.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O0 .00 3,815.00 .00 .00 352.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,426.00 309.00 .00 .00 .00 1,299.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1994-95 REVENUE .00 325.00 .00 704.00 5,844.00 .00 4,498.00 .00 940.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,492.00 7,630.00 .00 .00 1,086.00 590.00 1,180.00 .00 35,654.00 2,852.00 324.00 .00 .00 .00 1,877.90 2,629.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE BALANCE ,00 325.00- .00 704.00- 5,844,00- .00 4,498.00- .00 940.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,492,00- 7~630.00- .00 .00 168,914.00 590.00- 1,180.00- .00 35,654.00- 2~852.00- 324.00- .00 .00 .00 11877.90- 21629.00' .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 % COL 0.6 REVPRIN2 10/10/94 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4147 4148 4149 4150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4169 4170 4175 4180 4200 4206 4226 4260 4261 4262 4369 4370 16:28:02 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION VACATIONS PLAN CK DOCUMENT PROCESSING CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK TRACT NAP PLAN CHECK AMENDED MAP PLAN CHECK 4TH & SU8S. SUBMITTALS FEMA STUDY REVIEW LOMA REVIEW DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE K-RAT STUDY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FORMA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY LAND DIV UNIT NAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK REVENUE TO DATE GENERAL FUND CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .OO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 170,000.00 170,000.00 SEPTEMBER REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 980.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .OO .00 2,495.00 17,946.00 17,946.00 1994-95 REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,770.00 710.00 .00 .00 .O0 .00 .00 13,915.00 89,020.90 89,020.90 BALANCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,T;fO.O0- 710.00- .OO .O0 .00 .00 .00 13,915.00- 80,979.10 80,979.10 PAGE 2 % COL 52.4 52.4 REVPRIN2 "94 16:28:02 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION REVENUE TO DATE GRAND TOTALS CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT SEPTEMBER 1994 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE 170,000.00 170,000.00 SEPTEMBER REVENUE 17,946.00 17,946.00 1994-95 REVENUE 89,020.90 89,020.90 BALANCE 80,979.10 80,979.10 PAGE 3 % COL 52.4 52.4 REVPRIN2 PAGE 10/10/94 16:28:02 CITY OF TENECULA REVENUE RECAP REPORT SEPTENBER 1994 001-161 DESCRIPTION PLANNING GRAND TOTALS ADJUSTED ESTZNATE 170,000,00 170,000,00 SEPTENBER REVENUE 17,946,00 17,946,00 1994-95 REVENUE 89,020,90 89,020,90 BALANCE % COL 80,979.10 52.4 80,979.10 52.4 REPT155 COUNT & VALUATION SUMHARY BY TYPE PAGE 1 10/10/94 15:30 SubtotaL: Cnstr Type SEPT 1994 Date Range 1 09/01/94 Thru 09/30/94 SEPTEMBER 1994 Date-Type: 1 T ' (Select):PLAN A/P/~ Type Construction type Count Sq Feet VaLuation Fees Paid A PLANNING CASE-1994 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EXT OF TIME/PLOT PLANS MINOR/MAJOR EVENT/PROFIT MINOR EVENT - NON PROFIT PF,/'EIVED PRIOR TO SIERRA PARCEL MAP-SCHED E-SWRS PLOT PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE REV TENT SUBD/AFTER 2 YR SUBSTAN CONFORM-GENERAL 1 0 .OO 1,483.00 3 0 .00 399.00 1 0 .00 50,00 1 0 .00 6,064,00 2 0 .00 380,00 1 0 .00 41762,00 2 0 .OO 740,00 13 0 .00 21,429.00 * TOTAL ** 13 0 .00 21,429,00 APPROVAL ~.~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joe Kicak, interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer October 18, 1994 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for September, 1994. \agdrpt\O222\moactrpt CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report OCTOBER, 1994 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Date: October I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. Pala Community Park: Construction began on August 15, 1994. The site has been rough graded and the pad for the concession stand has been poured. The water mainline has been installed and disinfected. The conduit for SCE and GTE has been placed within Temecula Lane. The contractor is scheduled to install the sewer mainlines and to begin placing the masonry block for the concession stand the week of October 10, 1994. The project includes irrigation and landscaping, a concession stand and restroom facility, basketball courts, tennis courts, volleyball courts, soccer field, picnic areas and a parking lot and is approximately 10% complete. Construction is scheduled to be completed by June 1995. 2. Sports Park Slooe Repair: Construction began at the end of April, 1994. The construction of the project has been completed and the 90 day maintenance period began October 3, 1994. The project consisted of the reconstruction of the slope below Margarita Road, the installation of an irrigation system and landscaping on the reconstructed slope, and the reconstruction of a portion of the earthen channel meandering through the park. 3. Loma Linda Park - Ih Construction began the end of July, 1994 and is approximately 60% complete. The site has been rough graded and the sidewalk and irrigation mainlines and laterals have been installed. The contractor has also installed the playground equipment and constructed the play area curb. The site is expected to be prepared for planting during the week of October 10, 1994. Construction is expected to be completed by the end of November, 1994 and consists of grading and the installation of irrigation, landscaping, play equipment and other amenities. 4. Ynez Road Landscape Improvements: Construction began on June 15, 1994. A project walk through was conducted and the contractor is working on completing the punch list items. pw04\moactrl~t\cip~94\Oct 10/06/94 Monthly Activity Report October 15, 1994 Page 2 5. Traffic Signal at Winchester Rd. |HWY. 79N) & Nicolas Rd. City Council awarded the contract to Paul Gardner Corporation. The project consists of constructing a temporary three-way traffic signal at the intersection of Winchester (HWY. 79N) and Nicolas Road. A pre-construction meeting was conducted on October 6, 1994 and the traffic signal poles will be ordered once the Notice to Proceed is executed. The estimated traffic signal pole delivery is 14 to 16 weeks. 6. Traffic SiQnal Modification at Rancho California Rd. & Front St. City Manager approved the contact with the lowest responsible bidder, Paul Gardner Corporation on August 24, 1994. The project includes the installation of new loop detectors and striping to provide a dual left turn lane from south bound Front Street to east bound Rancho California Road. A pre-construction meeting was conducted on September 13, 1994 and work is expected to start on October 17, 1994 and be completed by October 19, 1994. 7. Lone Valley Wash Channel: A pre-construction meeting was held with Trautwein Construction on September 15, 1994. Work started on Monday, September 26, 1994 and will be completed by the middle of October, 1994. Work consist of sediment removals, erosion repair and rip- rap placement within portions of the channel adjacent to Rancho California Rd. and between Calle Tajol and Meadows Parkway. 8, Kent Hinterqardt Memorial Park: Construction began August 22, 1994 and is approximately 30% complete, Work is expected to be completed prior to the end of January, 1995. The contractor has placed the first few courses of block and is expected to pour the concrete slab for the concession stand during the week of October 10, 1994. The project consists of the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility with a 225 square foot porch. 9. Traffic Sional & Vehicle Pre-Emption Installation The bid opening was on August 19, 1994 and staff is reviewing the compatibility of the proposed equipment with the City's existing equipment. The project includes the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Pre-Emption equipment at four (4) signalized intersections and Vehicle Emergency Pre-Emption equipment on nine (9) Fire Department vehicles. pwO4\rnoactrpt\cip\94\Oct 10/06/94 Monthly Activity Report October 15, 1994 Page 2 I1. PROJECTS BEING BID: 1. Pala Road/Route 79S Interim Imorovements Staff recommended at the September 27, 1994 City Council meeting to reject the bid that was opened on August 4, 1994 and to re-bid the project. The agenda item was continued to the October 11, 1994 meeting, 2. Winchester Road Interim Ramo Improvements: On July September 23, 1994 staff received approval from Caltrans for the projects plans and specifications. Staff will be requesting at the October 11, 1994 City Council meeting for the authorization to solicit bids. This project will widen the south side of Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and the I-15 south bound on- ramp, which will create an exclusive east bound right turn lane onto the south bound 1-15. Also, the north side of Winchester Road will be widened to provide for a smother transition from the south bound I-15 off-ramp going west on Winchester Road. The existing traffic signal will be modified to provide for these widenings and the landscaping and irrigation will be installed adjacent to the proposed street improvements. 3. Traffic Signal at Margarita Rdo & Avenida Barca On September 23, 1994, staff received Caltrans approval of the project plans and specifications. This project is Federally funded and is administrated by the State of California. This project consists of the installation of a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the intersection of Margarita Rd. and Avenida Barca. III. WORK IN DESIGN 1. Winchester Road Looo: The consultant has resubmitted the revised Project Report and plans to Caltrans for their review, 2. Liefer Road, John Warner Road, and Santiago Road: The City has selected a consultant for each of the three road projects. The pwO4\moactrpt\cip\94\Oct 10/06/94 Monthly Activity Report October 15, 1994 Page 2 consultants were selected and ranked on qualifications. Staff has notified all participants of the results. The service level R funding source for the above road projects was scheduled for a public hearing on June 14, 1994, but the City Council has recommended that an alternative source of funding be used for the above project. 3. Walcott Corridor: Staff returned RBF & Associates first plan check on October 3, 1994. Staff is expecting RBF to return the second plan check on the week of October 24, 1994. The project will provide for two (2) travel lanes (total of 32' of pavement width) within 66' wide graded dedicated right-of-way. The alinement will follow the existing right- of-way and accommodate a 30-mph design speed. The total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. 4. Sports Park Parking1 and Skate Board Park Second plan check comments were received by the City September 26, 1994. The plans and specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the end of November, 1994. The improvements include grading, installation of irrigation, landscaping, roller hockey rink, skateboard park, sidewalk, rest room facility and parking lot. 5. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project Second plan check comments were received by the City September 27, 1994. The plans and specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the end of November, 1994. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. The construction activities are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum and church renovation projects. 6. Moraaa Rd. Street Widenine The Consultant is redesigning the box culvert outlet structure due to the significant changes in the existing site conditions which were created after the rains in the past year and a half. The first plan check of the new design has been returned to the Consultant and is expected to be returned on the week of October 17, 1994. 7. Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Iml~rovements On September 1, 1994 notices were sent out of various utility companies to inform them of a Capital Improvement Project. This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for Fiscal Year 1994-95. This project consists of the installation of approximately 14,600 square feet of sidewalk on the northerly side of Rancho Vista pwO4\moactrpt%cip\94\Oct 10/06/94 Monthly Activity Report October 15, 1994 Page 2 Rd. between Mira Loma Dr. and Santa Suzanne Dr., the easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between Rancho Vista Rd. and Santa Cecilia Dr., and the southerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. east of Avenida de la Reina. 8. Solana Way Storm Drain Improvements - RFP No. 26 The City will be inviting proposals from qualified firms to provide professional engineering services for the construction of a storm drain from Ynez Road to Acacia Park Resort Apartments. The proposals will be sent out to the public in November 1994. The improvements to be constructed includes but limited to grading, main line storm drain, utility relocations, misc. structures, erosion control, and traffic control. pwO4\rnoectrpt\cip\94\Oct 10/06/94 LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects September, 1994 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey Date: October 10,1994 FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of $246,297 to date. PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09): The Preliminary Grading Plan has been submitted to the City and is currently being reviewed by Staff. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159): The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction: Temecula Creek is undergoing construction and the improvements are nearly complete. Butterfield Stage Road improvements are complete and the road is nearly ready for City 8cceptaFIce, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 161}: Construction of Nicolas Road, as part of AD 161 improvements, has been completed and the road is ready for City acceptance. The list of the remaining AD 161 remaining improvements has been approved by the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors. The updated list is as attached. CALLE PINA COLADA BYPASS (PROJECT N0.94-16): City Staff's comments on the study were transmitted to the design engineer who is in the process of incorporating them. r :lmoact~tl dev1941sepl~mb~r OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT: Certain improvements are contemplated in conjur~ction with the Old Town Entertainment Project. ~r provision of the engineering services, the following Request for Proposals (RFP) have been dmtributed to consultants: RFP #027 "Phase I - Western Bypass Corridor" RFP #028 "First Street Extension" RFP #029 "Rancho California Road/Front Street Intersection Improvements" RFP #030 "Old Town Parking Study" r:lmoncu~lldev1941~*plembcr )" LU ,,I "r Cn Z uJ uJ FROM: David F_. Barnhart SUBI~u/'-kAL DAT~ Au~s.t 25, 1994 Dimaot of TransE:~tation Sb'B~ECT: As~mm~t Di~,~c~ No. 161 CWinches~r Pwpenie~) Re~/ocafion of A.~essmen~ Liens SUBk,~uttAfjTO TBiE BOARD OF SUI'LRVXSORS [ 3,~ '~ ~ ,, COUNTY OF~UVERS~E, STATE OF C. AI/FORNL~ ' ' RECOMMEh'DED MOTION: · q'hat the Boa~'d (1) Approve the 1~jec~ Priorities and Funding Poli~ (attached p..xh/hits A and B) 4.~ the polic/objec~iv*.s for Assessmen~ Distflct No. 151 (AD 161) that allow the approved bond autli~rization [or AD 161 to remain ar $115,S58,373~8; (2) Dire~ staff to communic~e these p~Hcies t~the la~l owners, developers, public utilities and other public entities involved with AD 161; (3) Di'rea staff to beEin preparation of the Y-n_~ne,~r'S RepO~ for reallocation of the Assessmere Lien; anc~ upon completion of the EnEin~fs R~pon, (4) Dirca staff to initiate the pmce. edjm~s for realloca~g the assessmen~ lie- for AD 161. BACKC, ROD~h Subsquint to your Board's de~sion in la~e June to present to the propen), owners within AD 161 thee o1~ions with re~'d to the r~msinin~ f. ac~litiu to be financed, Supervisors Coniceros and BuSter and staff m~ with the residential pro~n~y owners on luly 13, 199~ at a noticed public meeting W~ch was a~:tende~l by approximately 500 individuals. l:CC:lt Ds~icl E Bar~han Dir=c~or of Transportation FL~rAN~ D~TA= ~u~RENT YEA.K COST $ 0 COUNTY COST $ 0 SOURCE OF FI/NDS: AD I61dBoud Proceects c- o. i: ,PP IqOV .' ANNOAt COST 47.2, mi/lion wcr nex~ 2 years I~ C01~NT YEAR B~: ~ ~ __ NO 9~5 On motion u~ Supervisor Larson, seconded by Supervisor Coniceros and dul~,,carried b~ unanimous vo~e, IT WAS ORDERED that the above ma~%ex~ i~ approved as recommended, and ~hat 'the Traneportat-ion De~rtment report hack on o~tionel facilities. Ayes: Buster,nX)unlap, Noes: None AbsenT.: None Date: Sop%emir 6, 1994 xc: Transpo~ha%ion Pn~A~I.r~L Fot~ u (!~, 7.qs) Ceniceros~ LeTson and Younglove Gerald A. Malone? Dis~, i&3 AGENDA NO- 3,22 Form 11 AD 161 Reallocation of A,ss~ment Liens Page 2 At thai meetinF,, twenty-~wo persons spoke. Mny of ~e who ~ ~d n~ indi~te a cle~ pcc~renc~ ~r ~y o~ ~e ~o~ p~eme~; n~er, ~y ~p~ ~e~ ~is~aion with ~ In ~fio~ ~ ~n~ w~ ~en ~e op~ty to lu~ a b~lot on w~ch ~ey could in~cat~ their choi~ ~ to the'~re~ ~ild~ut ~o~. Following is ~e ~ly ~m t~ b~lo~ ~: 19 2 0 10 Completion of Winchester Road Option A Option B Nothing tunher be construc~d Staff met with tim lar~= property owners/developers on July 6, .Iuly 27th, and AuEust 10th in Tamecola. This gloul~ was aslmd at their final meeting on August 10th w indicate pr~ferenc~ between hhe thi'ee options, assuming th~ dollar amoums indic~tect on the preli---~navy assessment lien "raspread" could be adjusted by as much as leo percent in either direction. Exhibit C, attached, shows the preference of those attending the meeting, the perc=maEe shown b~low is eie percentage of land wi~:hin the District that each proper~y owner repmsenxs: 46.05% 0,00~ 21.05~'~ 18.93~ 13.97% Consuuct Winchester Road (5 pro!~r~y owners) (Note: Two of these properly owners indicaled a d~irs fur one or ~,o additional facilities) Option 'A Option B (11 property owners) No additional constru,'*ion to occur (2 property o~rlem) Did not vote (10 prol~rty owners) The eleven pwperD' owncrs who su1~x~rt Option B are smaller pfog,~rry omraem who arc less able to secure alternate finlmcin~ by which to consu'ua the facilities thsr ~re to be funded by this option. K~mper, one of the five prol~n'y owners indicating support only for the cons~rucliou of Wiuchester Road, stated that it supported Oplion k except for the construction o[ Mumeta Hot Sprin~;s Road- West & East. 3M Properties, another of the proper~y owners indicating su1:pvrt only for the construction of Vanchester Road, sta~..d that it desired to s~e funded the construaion of the 30-inch Ln~,k- sewer main thai h,s,,emcs the lIot[ cou,'-~ and is pan of Option A. 3M did not objea to either option A ot B as lon~ as it did not ~ assessed for th~ facilities thai don't benefit 3M. While the preferenc~ of both th~ residemial and large Fwl~erty owners would appear to be the construction of Winchester Road only and then to shut down AD 161 upon the completion ef this facility, there appean to be qualificalions tha~ -eed to be placed on this conclusion. The County ,..riterod into the formation of AD 161 to secure ihe ccr~sr. ruction of certain regional infrasU'ucrure that was needed for tie development of this re,on and to pmperiy mee~ the servic~ levels required by those who choose to live and work in ~ l~ion, ~ a,~ the regional fxuilities that a~ listed in Option A. Form 11 AD 161 Reallocation of Asse~smel/t T~cn~ Page 3 Tucolota Ct'~ck completes the major flood control facilities in the District and completes the lasl remaining gap in the flood ch=--~l between Murrie~.a Hot Springs Road F, as~ a~d Santa C~rtrudis Mumeta Hot Springs Road would provide a Bac~one east/west mad facility for the area a~ to ~ffi I-2~5, i-15, ~d S~e Highway 79 (Win~e~ ~o~. Mu~e~a H~ S~ W~t h~ ~t~mely d~edont~d pavcm~ w~ch ~ot cff~vely ~ pat~ and t~en~ pot~fi~ safety p~blem u~ ~c~ ~ The ~O-inch trunk sewer maix) is necessary to provide sewer service to app~u~lmate[y 1,500 ac~c~, or roughly one.third of the potemi~t residcnces in the Distria. The staff t~commendaxion calls for beginning prclimlnary work on the En~inccr's Pepon for re.~llocauon of the assessment llen a~ainst properties in the District. The commencemere o~ r. his work will dovetail with a study now being conduaed by CKSS Construaors, due on about September 18th, which is reviewing the assessment spread methodology utilized by the District assessment engineer, Wcbb and Associates. XHZI IT A The authorization l~t for AD No. 161 be kept at $115,558,373.67. That with the remaining authorization, the following facilities be constructed in =he following order of priority~ A. . Winchester Road B. Tucalota Creek Channel Murrieta Hot Springs Road - West and East (The easterly portion should be restricted to that portion fr-~ the easterly boundar~ of the Pulte proper~y to the westerly boundary of the FN Development Co./Roripaugh Ranches properties) 30 inch trunk sewer main that traverses the golf course (a~d those p~r~icus of Hunter Road that are required to protect the sewer) This represents a reduction in the facilities =hat were originally included in Option A. (Eliminates a ~ortion of Hunter Road that pot%ion of Murrieta Hot Springs Road - East from the westerly boundary of FN Develol~nen= Co./Roripaugh Ranches to the Pourroy Road alig. m-nt.) If there are savings or additional monies available toAD No. 161, then the following facilities be constructed in the priority indicated: A. The Margarita water pump station North General Kearny Road/Willows Road Staff recommends that these facilities be service level needs of this area. Each needed if a.y =Ur%her development in this constructed to mmet the of these facilities is area is to occur. B Direct-~ha= the monies realized through SB 300 from the construction of road facilities within AD No. 161 and re4m~ursements realised from ~he affected water agencies ~or the construction of water~nd sewer facilities by AD No. 161 be applied by AD No. 161 for ~he cons=rue=ion of additional facilities or redemption of bonds. In securing the ccunple~ion of the identified facilities, the County will encourage amd allow the =cllowin~ funding/construction procedures in the order of preference indicated. Permi~ Property Owners to construct the facilities at their expense, no= ssa public work, and receive · credit against their assessment lien for doing Pe~zi~ Propamy Owners to construct the facilities at their expense, as if a public work, and receive reimbursement from the s~le. Of a future series of bonds. Propercy Owners may advance =he dollars required construct ~he facility tnd allow =he County construct the facility as a public work, and receive reimbursemen~ for the dollar~ adv~nced fro= a future series of bonds. The count? facilities series. through AD NO. 161 will construct from the proceeds of ~n additional bond 3. The County will actively seek outside ~unding sources (such as SB 300) to reduce the assessment to proper=y Policy statement 2, which is allowed for b~ the statutory provisions ~overniug AD No. 161, is to ed~eso the timing concerns of the proper~yowners. It is unlikely that ADNc. 161 will be in a p~einion ~c sell a~ditional bonds in =he near ~uture. These options allow the propercy owners =o advance the costs and secure ~he construction oZ ~he =acili~ies to meet ~heir time schedule.' ~ TOTAL P~GE.009 ~ MEMORANDUM TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent October 3, 1994 Monthly Activity Report - September 1994 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of September 1994: II. Ill. IV. VI. VII. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 77 new and repainted legends B. 22,071 L.F. of red curb new and repainted C. 4,928 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding 23 77 75 4 31,475 12 1,254 r:\roads%ectrpt~94%09 skg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - September, 1994 " Page No. 2 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 14 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 23 service order requests for the month of September, 1994. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 42 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies. ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the followina: · 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping The total cost for Orange County striping services was $0.00 compared to $0.00 for September, 1994. PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the followino: · 0 sites, 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost 90.00 compared to $0.00 fo, September, 1994. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of September, 1994 was 926,271.00compared to 938,397.00for the month of September, 1994. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 920,010.70 96,260.50 CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer r:\roads\actrpt%94\09 skg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - September, 1994 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December. NELSON PAVING AND SEALING Account No. 5402 Date: September 8, 1994 Ynez @ Solana N.W.C. "Emergency" street repair Total Cost $1,395.00 Account NO. 5402 Date: September 2, 1994 Rainbow Canyon Road Pothole repair from Temecula Creek Inn to City Limits Total S.F. 700 Total A.C. 6 tons Total Cost 91,200.00 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Account No. 5402 Date: September 13, 1994 Diaz road between Rancho California Road and Winchester (east side) Shoulder grade Total Cost $918.00 Account No. 5401 Date: September 19, 1994 Moraga Channel Clean, grub and excavate silt and debris from channel Total Cost $1,500.00 r:\roeds\actrpt\94\O9 skg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - September, 1994 - Page No. 4 Account No. 5402 Date: September 6 & 7, 1994 Santiago w/o Margarita "Emergency" street repair Total A.C. 15 tons Total S.F. 1,200 Total Cost $6,097.00 Account No. 5402 Date: September 12, 1994 Margarita at Rancho Vista "Emergency" street repair Total A.C. 6 tons Total S.F. 180 Total Cost $3,858.00 D.B.X. INC. Account No. 5402 Date: September 15, 1994 Loop replacement Margarita Road @Rancho Vista Road "Emergency Street Repair". 10 loop replacements @ $335.00 each Total Cost $3,350.00 DEL RIO CONTRACTORS Account No. 5402 Santiago w/o Margarita Installed 870 L.F. of 6" A.C. Berm Total L.F. 870 Total A.C. 15 Tons Total Cost $2,692.70 r:\roeds~actrpt~94\09 skg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - September, 1994 Page No. 5 ARBOR PRO TREE SERVICE Account No. 5402 Date: September 8, 1994 Classic Way Removed 2 dead trees Total Cost $500.00 r:\roeds~actrpt\94~09 skg s. o :DATE 09-01-94 09-09-94 09-12-94 09-13-94 09-16-94 09-19-94 09-20-94 09-21-94 09-22-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - SEPTEMBER, 1994 STREET STENCILING :LOCATION: i~!~: :WORKCOMPLETED Area #3 See Daily for locations. Margarita @ Dartolo Area #1 & #2 7 School locations See Daily of locations. Area #1 See Daily for locations Margarita @ Via La Vida See Daily for locations. Area #2 See Daily for locations. Area #2 See Daily for locations. Area #1 See Daily for locations. Area #2 See Daily for locations. Grind & 14 Rel3ainted Grind & 4 Rel~ainted Repainted 8,650 Repainted 10,190 Installed 2 Grind & 7 Repainted Grind & 8 Painted Repainted 3,081 Grind & Repainted Legends Legends L.F. of Red Curb L.F. of Red Curb. Arrows - 150 L.F. 8" solid white Legends Legends L.F. of Red Curb 11 Legends 09-26-94 09-28-94 09-29-94 Area #2 See Daily for locations. Area #2 See Daily for locations. Area #2 See Daily for locations. Grind & Rel~ainted Grind & ReDainted Grind & 13 ReDainted TOTAL NEW & 77 :iEPAINTED ,EGENDS TOTAL L.F. OF 22,071 :lED CURB NEW & :iEPAINTED TOTAL S.F. OF 4,928 SANDBLASTING & GRINDING 9 Legends 9 Legends Legends DATE 09-01-94 09-02-94 . 09-06-94 09-06-94 09-07-94 09-08-94 09-09-94 09-09-94 09-20-94 09-20-94 20-94 09-27-94 09-27-94 09-29-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - SEPTEMBER, 1994 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG LOCATION 27468 Jon Christian Rancho Elementary School 30209 Sierra Madre 27175 Rainbow Creek 31021 Via Gilberto 30482 Spica Court 27462 Senna Court 33041 Tulley Ranch Road Wabash & Highway 79 30685 Milky Way Third Street ~ Mercedes 41640 Ave. de la Reina 43816 Rendova Place SDort's Park REQUEST Catch Basin plugged Broken Glass on sidewalk Tree replacement Sweeper concern Catch Bassin cleaning Trash pick-up concern Dumpslet crashed into car Sand bags @ catch basin S.N.S. Missing Tree trimming Catch Basin cleaning Trash pick-up concern Potholes Graffiti WORK COMPLETED 09-01-94 09-02-94 09-06-94 09-07-94 09-08-94 09-08-94 09-09-94 09-09-94 09-20-94 09-20-94 09-22-94 09-27-94 09-27-94 09-29-94 TOTAL S.O.R'S 14 pw~3\roads\wkcmpltd\94\O9.svrq 100394 DATE 09-01-94 O9-02-94 09-07-94 09-07-94 09-12-94 09-12-94 09-12-94 09-15-94 09-15-94 09-15-94 09-21-94 09-22-94 09-23-94 09-27-94 09-28-94 09-30-94 09-30-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETE - SEPTEMBER, 1994 SIGNS LOCATION Puas @ E. Loma Linda Leigh Lane @ Walcott Rancho Vista @ So. Cross Solana Way E/O Ynez Road First and Pujol Calle Medusa N/O La Serena 30985 Santiago Road Calle Medusa @ Welllington Yukon @ Copper Beech Nicholas Road E/O Calle Medusa Ynez Road S/O Rancho Vista Third Street @ Mercedes Ynez S/B @ K-Mart Calle Rio Vista @ Corte Alamar Riverton @ Calle Girasol Wabash & So. 79 Highway Piquito @ Varanos Replaced Replaced Replaced Removed Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Installed Installed WORK COMPLETED S.N .S. "T.C." S.N.S. "Mislabled" Bike Lane arrow "Graffiti" W-75 W-31 Type "N" "Graffiti" 2 R-1 "E.GoG." W-31 Type "N" "Old" R-1 & R-2 "45" "Graffiti" R-1 "Old" W-19 "T.C." R-1 "Graffiti" Duck X "T.C." Type "N" Faded R-17 (L) - R-16B "Missing" S.N.S. "T.C." W-31 W-56 2 "N" Vandalism Markers S.N.S. 3 N.H.N. TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED ,_!1 PW03LROADS/WKCMPLTD\94~09.SIGNS 100594 I DATE 09-01-94 09-06-94 09-12-94 09-12-94 09-16-94 09-19-94 09-20-94 09-20-94 09-21-94 09-29-94 -- '~-29-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - SEPTEMBER, 1994 LOCATION Calle Fiesta S/O Via Norte Calle Fiesta S/O Via Norte 41080 Via Halcon Calle Medusa N/O La Serena Ynez between Calle Halcon & Via Serrato Tea Tree/Holly Berry Iron Bark Lane Rancho Vista Road E/O Ynez Road Rancho Vista Road @ Mira Loma Drive Margarita @ Moraga Road 40385 Calle Medusa TREE TRIMMING I WORK COMPLETED Trimmed 8 trees Trimmed 13 trees Trimmed I tree Trimmed 5 trees Trimmed 17 trees Trimmed 13 trees Trimmed 8 trees Trimmed 2 trees Trimmed 5 trees Trimmed 2 trees Trimmed 3 trees TOTAL TREES TRIMMED 77 -1- pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\O9.tre 100394 I DATE 09-01-94 09-06-94 09-12-94 09-13-94 09-15-94 09-15-94 09-16-94 09-19-94 09-21-94 09-21-94 09-21-94 09-21-94 09-22-94 09-27-94 09-28-94 o9-29-94 CITY OF TEMECULA' DEPARTMENT OE PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - SEPTEMBER, 1994 WEED ABATEMENT LOCATION :! :: :i~:: ~::~:i~::~!:: :WORK COMPLETED Calle Fiesta S/O Abated Via Norte Calle Fiesta S/O Abated Via Norte Calle Medusa Abated Rancho Calif. Road and Abated Ynez Road Calle Medusa @ Abated Nicholas Road Rancho Vista Road E/O Abated Le Primavera Ynez Road between Abated Calle Halcon & Via Serrato Rancho Calif. Road Abated between Humber & Moraga Road Rancho Vista Road ~ Abated Mira Loma Drive Solana Way @ Del Rey Abated Margarita N/O No. Abated General Kearney Del Rey Circle Abated Pujol @ Sixth Street Abeted Margarita between Ahated Rancho Vista & Pauba Area #4 Abated (See Daily for locations) Calle Medusa S/O Abated Enfield 650 650 350 800 1,500 1,000 1,500 1,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F.of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. We~ 500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 2,500 5,000 400 7,000 1,500 4,125 3,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of Flowline Weeds S.F. of Curbline Weeds S.F. of Curbline Weeds S.F. of Curblline Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds L.F. of Sidewalk Weeds TOTAL S.F.R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT-~- CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL - SEPTEMBER, 1994 DATE 09-02-94 09-07-94 09-07-94 09-07-94 09-07-94 ~-07-94 _~-13-94 09-13-94 09-15-94 09-20-94 09-27-94 09-28-94 LOCATION ' Bell Tower Plaza Ynez N/O Rancho Vista Santiago N/O Amarita Way Calle de Velardo @ Pescado Rancho Vista between So. Cross and Mira Loma Drive Santiago Bridge First Street at Pujol Street Rancho Calif. Road @ Yukon & Margarita Road Sport's Park 28550 & 28558 Pujol Main Street and Pujol Pujol @ Sixth Street WORK COMPLETED Removed 105 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 6 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 200 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 6 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 20 SoF. of Graffiti Removed 116 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 44 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 85 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 565 S.F, of Graffiti Removed 25 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 80 S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL 12 .OCATIONS TOTAL S.F. 1.254 TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For September, 1994 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak ,7~-/ Prepared by: Marty Lauber ~ Date: October 10, 1994 I. TRAFFIC REQUESTS TRAFFIC REQUESTS: July August Sept. Received 3 4 1 Completed 12 5 1 Under Investigation 6 6 6 Scheduled for Traffic Commission 2 1 0 II. DIVISION PROJECTS: Completed the pedestrian safety investigation for Rancho Vista Road adjacent to the Temecula Community Recreation Center and our sports park. The results will be presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at their October 27 meeting. Received approval for a Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant called "Traffic Safe Cities" for Temecula Community Traffic Watch Program. This program will include citizen involvement in increasing residential neighborhood awareness through the use of a speed radar trailer and informational brochures. Participated as Staff representative at the first Public/Traffic Safety Commission Goals and Objectives Workshop on September 8, 1994. The Commission will be submitting a resolution for City Council approval defining Commission responsibilities as required by Ordinance No. 93-18. The next workshop is to be held on October 13, 1994. Held a Temecuia Transit Workshop with Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), Greyhound, shopping center owners and representative of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. RTA presented their short and long range transit plans and introduced the Transportation "NOW" program. The commission expressed the need for bus connections north along the 1-15 Corridor and stops inside shopping centers. The Workshop identified a general need for RTA to pursue an active communication link with the City to develop an effective transit system. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission's Jefferson Street subcommittee concluded its final meeting. Staff has been directed to monitor the Jefferson Street Corridor and report to the Commission when Staff recommends substantial improvements. No action is to be taken at this time. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROV CITY ATTORNEY~.~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: October 18, 1994 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ~_ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DISCUSSION: A design services contract for the Parkview Fire Station Project will be considered by the Board of Directors on October 11, 1994. If approved, staff will proceed with a one day workshop to discuss the programming components of the fire station, levels of fire protection and paramedic services, and recreational opportunities of the Parkview site. This workshop will be the first step towards developing a master plan for the site. Staff has released Requests for Qualifications to solicit the design services of a Landscape Architect for the Master Plan of the Margarita Road Park Site. Development of this 20 acre site will provide additional active/passive park land to the City's park system. Staff will begin the interview and negotiation process in the next 60 days. Staff anticipates that the Master Plan will be constructed in phases. It is anticipated that this item will be considered by the Board in December, 1994. City staff and representatives from the Temecula Valley Unified School District met on August 31, 1994 to discuss joint use and lighting of the sports fields at Temecula Middle School. Staff has prepared a draft Joint Use Agreement which is currently uhder review by the City Attorney. The Agreement is designed to address construction, usage and maintenance issues. Lighting the fields at Temecula Middle School will provide additional soccer, baseball, track, and football playing fields which will be available for extended hours for youth sports programs. Upon approval of the Agreement by all parties, staff will release a Request for Qualifications for the design services of an Electrical Engineer. This is anticipated that this agreement and the design services contract will be considered by the Board in December, 1994. Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II is still under construction and scheduled for completion in mid-November. It will then enter into a 90 day maintenance period and be open to the public by mid-January. The second phase will increase the parkland by approximately one acre and includes a tot lot, open play areas, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation. The contractor has begun construction on the Restroom/Snack Bar facility at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. It is estimated that the construction will take approximately 90 working days to complete (January, 1995). Plans for Sam Hicks Monument Park is currently in second plan check. Staff met with representatives from the museum and the design consultants to discuss construction phasing of the various elements. The museum will begin their renovation of St. Catherine's Church by the end of November or first of December, 1994. Construction is estimated to take 90 days. The City will solicit bids for the park improvements and begin construction after the church renovations have been completed. The museum will also be moving forward with plan check approval and anticipates beginning construction for the new museum facility by March, 1995. Cost estimates for the Sports Park Improvement Project have increased higher than what was initially projected by the design consultant. As a result, a discussion of the budget for this project will be brought forward to the Board of Directors at the November 15, 1994 meeting. The biological study for the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Lake Project is completed, and the report has recently been submitted to the City. The consultant and staff will analyze the information and take the appropriate mitigation requirements into consideration during the master planning process. The Youth Soccer and Pop Warner Football seasons are underway. Staff will work diligently with these youth groups to address operational concerns and maintenance procedures. With day-light savings time changes which will occur the end of October, Pop Warnet will be moving from Margarita Middle School to the Sports Park for practice. Eventually, this situation will be alleviated with the lighting project at Temecula Middle School. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM i APPRO~~ CITY ATTOP~NEY FINANCE OFF CITY MANAGE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/Redevelopment Agency Board Members Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer October 18, 1994 Authorization of Agreement for Financial Advisory Services for the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the RDA Board Members approve the terms of the Agreement for Financial Advisory Services with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates and authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of the Agreement. DISCUSSION: On March 22, 1994, the City Council authorized 9125,000 for the purpose of conducting feasibility studies as required by the Memorandum of Understanding between the city and the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and TZBG, Inc. (Zev Buffman). To date, contracts have been authorized in the amount of 9239,420,of which TZBG, Inc., is responsible for one-half. Expenditures to date for these consulting services total $170,426 of which 976,738 has been reimbursed by Zev Buffman. On September 7, 1994 the City Council authorized an appropriation of 965,000 for the purpose of additional studies. This amount will be matched by Zev Buffman, bringing the total available for additional studies to a maximum of 9130,000. Additional consultant services authorized to date amount to 932,888. The additional studies required included financial advisory consulting services for the purpose of preparing a financing plan for the project. The financing plan would include identifying alternative sources of revenue available to fund the project costs including the sale of bonds, the use of financing districts to fund certain infrastructure improvements and the infusion of private investment capital. On August 23, 1994 the City Council authorized the selection of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates as the City's general Financial Advisor. Attached is a proposal for advisory services for the purpose of assisting with the formulation of a coordinated plan to fund the project. Initial services, which are required to be paid on a time and material basis, will not exceed 910,000. This authorization will provide services sufficient to assist staff with the preparation of a financing plan for City Council review. Payment for Financial Advisory Services in connection with any bond sales which may result from an approved financing plan will be paid from bond proceeds and are contingent on the sale of bonds. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds have been appropriated and are available in the RDA consulting budget and one-half of the fees associated with this contract will be billed to TZBG, Inc. Attachment: Agreement for Services from Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates October 7, 1994 Fieldman. Rolapp & Associates City of Temecula, City Hall 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590-3606 ATTN: Mary. Jane McLarney Director of Finance Financial Advisory Services Old Town Entertainment Center FRA Prqiect No. 94239 Dear Ms. McLarney: It was a pleasure meeting with you to discuss the proposed financing of the many faceted Old Town Entertainment Center. It will be exciting and challenging to participate in the success of this ambitious prqiect Pursuant to your request, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates is pleased to submit this letter agreement (the "Agreement") to the City and/or Redevelopment Agency or other public or private Issuer (the "Issuer") for municipal financial advisory services to be performed in conjunction with the funding of the proposed Old Town Entertainment Center and related infrastructure improvements and other appurtenances, equipment and real property acquisition (the "Project") We understand that the funding of the Project may be accomplished with the proceeds of a variety of both taxable and tax exempt debt issues the structuring, schedulinu (~j) ~ and sale o~'which we will assist you with (the "Debt") ' We have extensive experience in handling this type of assignment. We offer to assist the Citv in a financial advisory capacity by utilizing and making available to you the research, statistical, and consultant staff of our organization to such extent as may be necessary and helpful. Ms, Katrina Heller, CIPFA, Vice President, assisted by Mr Jeff Hyman, Esq,, Associate and staff. will be directly responsible for providing financial advisory services to the City For purpose~s ql' this ,4greement. Debt and or Bond~- means Cert!/icates q/I~arttcipatton Short-term ,Votes. Bond,4nticipation Notes. (;ront.qntictpation .Vote,~. derzrative product.~ or other evidence oj mdebtedness. -1- CITY OF TEMECULA October 7, I994 Page Two Our firm acts strictly in an advisory_ capacity We do not underwrite nor do we place securities We are independent financial advisors and charter members of the National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors Our approach is to provide objective advice on a fee for service basis and develop the most cost effective approach for our clients. The Scope of Services is presented on a fee basis as outlined in the Fees Section. We propose the following approach: Our services can be divided into phases The first phase would be concerned with the financial planrang and all other necessary. analyses. public meetings, conferences, work sessions, and seminars related to the Project The second phase would be concerned with furnishing financial advisory. services to be performed in conjunction with the marketing of the Debt Phase three would involve any additional financial advice relative to the administration of the Debt subsequent to issuance, the Project and/or any other financial advice requested by the City -2- SCOPE OF SERVICES We agree to provide the following advisor5_' services in connection with an>- and all financing requirements as the3 petlain to the Project: [PHASE 1 I. Preliminary Survey We x~ill confer with City staff. bond counsel. consultants. and other lnterested partms for the purpose of making a preliminar5 survey' of the Project and to assist in the formulation of a coordinated plan to fund the Project. 11. Financial Renort (ifrettuested) Prepare and furnish the City a financial feasibility report that ~ill include: A. An analysis of and an opinion of the financial feasibility of using taxable or tax exempt Debt to fund the Project. B A revie~ of the underlying assumptions and prqiections C Various approaches to funding the Project D If Debt is required, xxe x~ould prepare: E An analys~s of estimated annual pnncipal and interest pa3ments_ xxhich the obligor x~ould have to pay on its obligation and the effect of such paSmcnts on rates. charges. fees and other available revenues: Detailed recommendations as to the technical features of the ~nm~cing. including the principal amount of Debt required. matunt_x schedules. call features. sinking funds. reserves. credit enhancement devices and derivative products. etc,_ which will. m our opinion. makc the proposed financing most acceptable to prospective purchasers of the Debt and. therefore. marketable at the lowest possible cost: and: II1. Attendance at Public Meetino, s/Conferences We will attend meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessar) and, in addinon, bc available to attend meetings and conferences to explain the effects of the proposed financing, IV. Consultation/Advice We will be available for consultanon and advice. V. Work Sessions and Seminars We will be available to conduct and/or participate in work sessions and seminars. which may be held to discuss the Project and methods of public financing -3- IPHAS n Phase II services will commence upon appropriate action of the City directing the sale of the contemplated Debt Phase I services shall be deemed completed upon commencement of Phase II services We will perform the following additional services in conjunction xx~th the marketing of the Debt I. Municipal Securities Market Furrush the City with information concerning current municipal securities market condmons and make recommendations as to the technical details of the financing. including maturitx schedules. funds. covenants, redemption features. and other details which x~ill, in our op~mon. make the proposed financing most acceptable to prospective purchasers and. therefore. marketable at the lowest possible cost. I1. Sale of Debt At the direction of the City either assist in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Debt or. assist the City in calling for competitive bids. A. Ne2otiated Sale If it is determined to sell the Debt by negotiated sale. x~e will: Selection of Underwriters. Assist the Cit3 in the selection of a qualified underwriter whose reputatinn, financial strength. and experience xxill best ser~e the interests of the Citx. 2 Consultation/Advice. Attend an_x meetings conceming the PrQject xxhen deemed necessary and. in addition. be available for consultation and advice with such time as all Debt to finance the Project have been sold and thereafter upon request. Ne2otiated Sale of Debt. contemplated Debt to the recommendations to the City Assist the Cit.x in negotiating the sale of the underwriter selected and make appropriate Financial Review of Documents. Review the financial aspects of all documents relating to the marketing of the proposed Debt including an5' Official Statement or Disclosure Document and Bond Purchase Agreement. Due Dilio, ence Meetino,. When a duc diligence meeting is held. wc x~ill participate in such due diligence meeung and assist the City in the examination of pertinent financial data. 6 Multiple Sales/Security Review and Services to be Provided. In the event the authorized Debt are sold in more than one sale. we will rewexx the financial terms and conditions of each offering to determine to what extent, if an>. there is an impact on the sccurit_x of each series of Debt and we will provide services for each series of Debt in accordance with this section. -4- I11. B. Sealed Comnetitive Bids If it is determined to sell the Debt at sealed competitive bid. we will pcrfomn the following services: Official Statement. Accumulate and compile into an Official Statement economic. financial. and statistical data pertaining to the proposed financing, which Official Statement shall be prepared on the City's bchalf and xxill bc satisfacto~' to the Ci~ The Official Statement will include the Notlcc of Sale Due Dili!~ence Meetinffs. Prior to the production and distribution of anx Official Statement. the Cit_x agrees to hold a due diligence meeting(sl to ~cri~x the accuracy of the data contained in the Official Statement and makc full disclosure of all pertinent information concerning the econom.x and finances of the City. We x~ill participate in such due diligence meeting(s) and assist the Cit_x in the exan'unation of pertinent financial data. 3. Production of Official Statement. Under the supervision of the Cit3. cause to produce said Official Statement. 4 Distribution of Official Statement. Distribute copies of the Official Statement to mumcipal securities underwriters. UDdatino, of Official Statement. In the event the authorized financing is sold in more than one sale of Debt. we xx~ll update and distribute cop~es of the revised Official Statement if applicable Consultation/Advice. Attend any meetings concerning thc Pr<~lect xxhen decmcd necessary and. in addition. be available for consultation and advice until such nine as the Debt to finance the Project have been sold and thereafter upon request 7 Contact of Bond Underwriters. Make direct contact with municipal securities underwriters in an effort to stimulate bidding on the Debt THE BOND BUYER Ad. Place an advertisement in THE BOND BUYER announcing the offering of the Debt prior to the time bids are received for such issuc Attendance at Bid Ooenino,. Attend meetings of the City at which bids for the Debt arc received for the purpose of assisting in the computation and evaluation of such bids Rating If deemed desirable. work with recognized rating service(s) m an attempt to obtain an advantageous rating of the Debt to be issued. IV. Insurance/Credit Facility/Derivative Products If deemed desirable. we will assist the City in obtaining a municipal bond insurance polic_x or other credit facility providing for guaranteed pa_xrnent of pnncipal and interest on the Debt and explore the efficiency of employing municipal derivative products V. Attendance at CIosine We will compute closing figures. including accrued interest. and assist bond counsel in coordinating events of the closing. If a competitive sale is conducted. the Ci~' agrees to furnish the successful b~dder. at thc closing. a certificate. signed by the appropriate officials of the City. acting m their official capacity, to the effect that to the best of their knowledge and belief. and after reasonable investigation. a) neither the Official Statement nor any amendment or supplement thereto contains any untrue statement of a matenal fact or omits to state an.x material fact neccssar> in order to make the statements therein. in light of the circumstances in x~hich thex were made. not misleading: b) since the date of the Official Statement. no event has occurred which should have been set forth in such an amendment or supplement: nor c} has there been anx material adverse change in the operation or financing affairs of the Cit.x since the datc of such Official Statement JPHASE 1I! 1. 11. I11. Investment of Proceeds We will assist the City to arrangc the investment of proceeds of the Debt This includes soliciting proposals from various investment setw'ice proriders On~oino, Assistance Wc will be available to assist the City with ongoing concerns related to the Debt. Additional Work If the Citx desires additional work bcxond the scope of this Agreement. it x~ill be performed x~hen authorized on a time and material expense basis in accordance x~ ith our then current fec schedulc -6- I nns I Fees for all Phase I Services shall be m an amount not to exceed $10,000 payable m monthly increments. In the event that Phase I Services have not concluded and/or Phase II Services have not commenced by March 1.1995. we will renegotiate an additional fee agreeable to the City for Phase 1 Services. Fees for Phase IIl Services are hourly fees payable monthly pursuant to our then current fee schedule. Fees for Phase I1 are payable at the closing. In the event of abandonment of the Project. abandonment fees shall be due and payable immediately after such abandonment. Fees based on hourly rates shall be due and payable monthly, within 30 days of billing. However. if we are requested by the City to execute a closing certificate relative to disclosure adequacy of either the prelimmary or final Official Statement. we will be paid a lump sum fee to be negotiated with the City. NEGOTIATED SALE For all Phase II services to be rendered resulting in a negotiated sale of Debt hereunder. the City will pay us a fee based upon the following schedule for each negotiated sale of Debt: PAR VALUE OF THE DEBT FEES $ -0- to $ 4,999,999 $ 32.500 $ 5,000,000 to $ 9,999,999 $ 39.500 $ 10.000.000 to $ 24.999.999 $ 46.500 $ 25.000.000 to $ 49,999.99Q $ 53.500 $ 50,000,000 to $ 79.999,999 $ 60.500 $ 80,000,000 to $ 99.999,999 $ 67.500 Over $ 100.000.000 to be negotiated COMPETITIVE SALE (Or quasi-competitive sale where we produce the qffictal statement) For all Phase II services to be rendered resulting in a competitive sale of the Debt hereunder. the Citv will pa,x us a fee for each competitive sale of Debt based upon the following schedule: PAR VALUE OFTHE DEBT FEES $ -0- to $ 4.999,999 $ 39.500 $ 5.000.000 to $ 9.999.999 $ 46,500 $ 10,000.000 to $ 24.999.999 $ 53.500 $ 25.000,000 to $ 49,999,999 $ 60.500 $ 50,000,000 to $ 79.999,999 $ 67.500 $ 80.000.000 to $ 99.999,999 $ 74,500 Over $ 100,000,000 to be negotiated -7- EXPENSES The City will reimburse us for usual and customary out-of-pocket expenses. including. but not limited to, the cost of printing and distributmg or updating the Official Statement. costs of financial advertising and costs incurred in connection with travel if such travel is necessaD in the furtherance of the Project and ~s authorized by the City In connection with such travel. it may be that we will be called on to advance the costs of airfare. hotel accommodations, meals. and other related expenses incurred on behalf of the PrQicct It is understood that such advances will be considered as an advance to the City and not to an> Agency official Any advances shall be reimbursed to us within thirty (30) days after expenses arc incurred If the financing transaction closes within thirty (30) days after expenses are incurred. then expenses ma.x be paid from the proceeds. District officials max' be required to report an3' advances which are not reimbursed x~thin thim_' (30} days of expenditures on their financial disclosures statements In addition. if it is possible to obtain a rating on the Debt from Standard & Poor's Corporanon and/or Moody's Investor Service and/or other rating service and/or if municipal bond insurance is available. the City agrees to pay for the costs of such rating and insurance unless it is determined that thc cost of insurance shall be borne by the underwriter at the bidder's option ABANDONMENT In the event the Project is abandoned prior to the completion of financing. the City agrees to pa3 us a fec equal to the reasonable value of services rendered from the date of this Agreement to the date of abandonment Reasonable value for our services shall be determined by using our hourl.x rates m effect at the time of such abandonment, plus reimbursement for usual and customa~' out-of-pocket expenses. TERM This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the financing contemplated herein has been completed or the Prqlect is abandoned. whichever first occurs. ADDITIONAL TERMS It ~s expressb understood that this Agreement does not intend to and is not under an3 circumstances to bc construed as requmng us to perform any sen'ices which constitute the practice of laxx: x~e arc employed in an expert financial advisor3_ capac~t3 onb The Cit3. developer. landoxx~ers. consultants and other parties dealing with the Citx or involved in the Prc~iect x~ill be furnishing to us various data. reports. studies. computer pnnt-outs and other information and representations as to the facts involved in the Project which the City understands we will be using and rclJ ing upon in preparing the reports. studies. computer print-outs and other work products, We shall not bc obligated to establish or verify the accurac~ of the information furnished bx or on behalf of the Citx. nor shall x~e be responsible for the ~mpact or effect on its x~ork products of the information furnished bx or on behalf of the C it_x. in the event that such information is in error and therefore introduces error into our work products. -8- If the foregoing Agreement is satisfacto~ to you, please take appropriate acuon to authorize ~ts acccptancc by sigmng and returning the original cop,x hereof. RespectfulIS' submitted. FIEL AN. ROLAPP & ~S,/~I ES · t; / [ / Iifi~rtna Heller, CIPFA ~ Vice President KH/tfd Attachment Executed on behalf of the , 1994 ACCEPTANCE this da_x of B\ Title Date -9-