Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Analysis March 20061 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 VAN DELL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Engi neers•Plan ners•Surveyors 17801 Cartwright Road Irvine, CA 92614, (949) 474.1400, FAX: (949) 261.8482 e-mail: corporate@vandelba.00m RORIPAUGH RANCH NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA March 2006 Prepared for: Mr. Pete Olah Ashby USA, LLC 470 E. Harrison Street Corona, California 92879 Prepared By: Keith Rutherfurd, TE Paul Spiteri, EIT Nancy Li No. TR001647 �\ Exp. 9/30/06 - �//G/a (o APR 14 2006 By Planning Department TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD STUDY DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE ......................\ II. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD......................................................................................1 III. STUDY AREA TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT.............................................4 IV. FORECAST NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUMES................................6 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.............................................................................................6 Average Daily Traffic Volumes...........................................................................:...........6 V. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS...................................................................6 VI. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS .....6 Peak Hour Intersection Analysis...............................................:.....................................6 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Analysis..........................................................................10 VII. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD GATED ACCESS QUEUING ANALYSIS ...................10 VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS...............................................................................12 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A — Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis APPENDIX B — Intersection Level of Service Computation Reports (2000 HCM Method) APPENDIX C — North/South Loop Road Entry Gate Queuing Analysis K%Projects\850_0139%Eng%TechDocs%ReportsXTraffic Malysis ReporpTOC.doc List of Exhibits PAGE EXHIBIT 1 Project Location and Vicinity Map........................................................................2 EXHIBIT 2 North/South Loop Road and Adjacent Development............................................3 EXHIBIT 3A North/South Loop Road AM Peak Hour Turning Movement andRoadway Link Volumes................................................................................7 EXHIBIT.313 North/South Loop Road PM Peak Hour Turning Movement andRoadway Link Volumes...................:............................................................8 EXHIBIT 4 North/South Loop Road Average Daily Traffic and Capacity Ratios.....................9 EXHIBIT 5 North/South Loop Road Recommended Intersection Geometrics, Controls, andRoadway Configurations.............................................................................13 EXHIBIT 6A North/South Loop Road Signing and Striping Details (Sheet 2) .........................14 EXHIBIT 6B North/South Loop Road Signing and Striping Details (Sheet 3) .........................15 EXHIBIT 6C North/South Loop Road Signing and Striping Details (Sheet 4) .........................16 EXHIBIT 6D North/South Loop Road Signing and Striping Details (Sheet 5) .........................17 EXHIBIT 6E North/South Loop Road Signing and Striping Details (Sheet 6) .........................18 EXHIBIT 6F North/South Loop Road Signing and Striping Details (Sheet 7) .........................19 X.1Projects%850_0139\Eng%TechDocs\Repoas%TrafOc Analysis Report%TOC.doc TABLE 1 TABLE 2 List of Tables PAGE North/South Loop Road — Study Area Trip Generation ........................................ 5 Peak Hour Level of Service at North/South Loop Road Intersections ................11 X\Projects\B50_0139\Eng\TechDocslRep is\TraAic Malysis Rep MTOC. doc I 1 F 11 Van Dell and Associates, Inc. Ronpaugh Ranch — North/South Loop Road March 2006 Traffic Analysis City of Temecula, California I. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD STUDY DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE This study is an operational analysis of the proposed North/South Loop Road included in the Roripaugh Ranch Development Project. Exhibit 1 provides a project location and vicinity map for this project. A traffic impact analysis has previously been prepared for the Roripaugh Ranch Project by Urban Crossroads, Inc. This analysis, Ronpaugh Ranch Revised Traffic Impact Analysis, Revised November 26, 2001, assessed the impacts of the project on the surrounding roadway circulation network and identified recommended project mitigation measures. However, a detailed analysis of the North/South Loop Road was not included in this study. With ongoing planning and engineering of the North/South Loop Road and creation of tentative tract maps for the adjacent developments served by this roadway, there is now an opportunity to perform a focused analysis of this facility that considers each Specific Plan Planning Area and its point of access/egress along the loop road. In the sections that follow, this study identifies the trip generation of the planning areas surrounding the North/South Loop Road and documents daily and peak hour roadway and intersection turning movement volumes, the proposed number of through lanes, intersection lane configurations and controls, and level of service along the North/South Loop Road. II. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD Exhibit 2 shows the North/South Loop Road and the adjacent planning area developments. As shown on Exhibit 2, North/South Loop Road is an approximate 1.8 - mile loop road to the east of Butterfield Stage Road. North and South Loop Road connect with Butterfield Stage Road at Nicolas Road and Calle Chapos, respectively, to form four-way, signalized intersections. Capacity analysis and recommended lane configurations for these intersections were included in the previous study by Urban Crossroads, Inc. and these intersections are not included in this study. There is a gated entrance on North Loop Road approximately 2,975 feet east of Butterfield Stage Road and on South Loop Road approximately 525 feet east of Butterfield Stage Road. RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PROJECT LOCATION 215 79 MURK/FTq HOT SPRINGS ROAD FzOPO N �O P 15r a°. �o N\COWS J= S. LOOP RD. 00 THIRD CALLE PRIMARY ACCESS wr CHAPOS ACCESS a c Q O r° � w 6 w i (7 CITY OF TEMECULcoA 0 SECONDARY sERENP w ACCESS °A o Z) > NTS ROA° o j G�ORr1\P PS\ 0 0 �NGNO EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP VAN DELL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. o 1 CIVIL ENGINEERS o� SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS �o 178D1 CARTWRIGHT ROAD (949) 474-1400 -_ IRVINE CA 92514 ` PAGE 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .s RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 147. SFR15 / 1 C 121 SFR i a44l 1 D YF a PA30 PA N' 12-ACRESPA IB PA z7 MIDDLE SCH00 `�. 121 SFR PA 28Pa 31 19.7 -ACRES \ 20 -ACRES 181 SFR - SPORTS PARK HIGH SCHOOL / I 75 SFR In 130 SFR 47 SFR �`, , Pa 2t S. LOOP (ROAD Pa zo 24 SFR i 35 SFR -N- A NTS 147 SFR —NUMBER OF SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS EXHIBIT 2 NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD AND ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT ' Van Dell and Associates, Inc. Roripaugh Ranch — North/South Loop Road March 2006 Traffic Analysis City of Temecula, California ' North/South Loop Road provides access to approximately 1,100 single-family detached housing units, 20 -acre high school site, 12 -acre middle school site, 19.7 -acre sports ' park, and 4 -acre community park. Raised landscaped medians and a striped on -street bike lane on each direction of North/South Loop Road are proposed for its entire length. III. STUDY AREA TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ' Trip generation rates and proposed study area daily and peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Table 1. Trip generation rates are as identified in Trip Generation, 7° Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego Traffic Generators. SANDAG rates ' were used for the school and park land uses because rates from this source were available based on acres, which is how these uses are quantified on the various tract ' maps. ' Table 1 shows the developments surrounding the North/South Loop Road are anticipated to generate an average of 13,211 vehicle trips per weekday. The forecast ' peak hour traffic generation is 488 inbound and 701 outbound vehicle trips in the am peak hour, and 795 inbound and 586 outbound trips in the pm peak hour. The high school, middle school, and park land uses surrounding the North/South loop ' Road will generate trips beginning and ending within the study area. These "internal' trips will begin/end at the various planning areas and end/begin at the sites identified above without passing through either loop road intersection at Butterfield Stage Road. ' Approximately 18% of traffic generated by the study area land uses is "internal." Conversely, approximately 82% of traffic generated by the North/South Loop Road study tarea is "external' traffic and passes through either loop road intersection at Butterfield Stage Road. 1 1 4 I t Van Dell and Associates, Inc March 2006 1 Ronpaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road Traffic Analysis City of Temecula, California TABLE 1 North/South Loop Road Study Area Trip Generation 1 Trip Generation Rates' tAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Unit ADT In Out In Out 1. Single -Family Detached Housing (210) D.U. 9.57/D.U. 0.19 0.56 0.64 0.37 ' 2. Park (SANDAG) Acres 50.0/Acre 1.60 0.40 1.60 2.40 4. High School (SANDAG) Acres 50.0/Acre 8.00 2.00 2.10 4.90 3. Middle School (SANDAG) Acres 40.0/Acre 6.72 2.88 0.84 1.96 Study Area Trip Generation - Land Uses Adjacent to North/South Loop Road ' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Quantity ADT In Out In Out ' 1. Single -Family Detached Housing (210) 1,102 D.U. 10,546 .209 617 705 408 PA 14 _ 92 D.U. 880 17 52 59 34 PA 15 104 D.U. 995 .20 58 67 38 ' PA 16 PA 17 121 147 D.U. D.U. 1,158 1,407 23 28 68 82 77 94 45 54 PA 18 121 D.U. 1,158 23 68 77 45 PA 19 25 D.U. 239 5 14 16 9 PA 20 35 D.U. 335 7 20 22 13 ' PA 21 24 D.U. 230 5 13 15 9 PA 22 130 D.U. 1,244 25 73 83 48 PA 23 47 D.U. 450 9 26 30 17 PA 24 75 D.U. 718 14 42 48 28 ' PA 31 181 D.U. 1,732 34 101 116 67 Single -Family Detached Housing Subtotal 1,102 D.U. 10,546 209 617 705 408 ' 2. Park - PA 27, 30 23.7 Acre 1,185 38 9 38 57 4. High School - PA 28 20 Acre 1.000 160 40 42 98 3. Middle School - PA 29 12 Acre 480 81 35 10 24 ' Total 13,211 _ 488 701 795 586 1 1 1 Source: (210). (230). (820), and (430) Tru General,.. Ilh Fdilion - Insetule or Transportation Engineers (ITE) (SANDAG) - San LQego Traffic Generators - San Diego Association of Governments %VegecisW50_o1J9V'.q\lecn0ae�4ePo�aliraYx Msiyua PeyelSgeaESMPsVlaue O� i�oynJ^p Sen akSMni ' 5 I L 1 1 F �I IJ 1 1 Van Dell and Associates, Inc. March 2006 Ronpaugh Ranch — North/South Loop Road Traffic Analysis City of Temecula, California IV. FORECAST NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Exhibits 3A and 3B show am and pm peak hour turning movement volumes at intersections and the total (two-way) peak hour volumes on roadway links along the North/South Loop Roadway. Average Daily Traffic Volumes Exhibit 4 shows forecast weekday 24-hour average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along the North/South Loop Roadway. V. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Traffic signal warrant analysis was performed for each intersection along the North/South Loop Road based on forecast peak hour and daily traffic volumes. Based on this analysis, none of the interior loop road intersections require signalization. Traffic signal warrant calculations for each intersection are included in the Appendix A. VI. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Peak Hour Intersection Analysis To provide a detailed analysis of traffic operation and to evaluate level of service, the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual method was used to analyze stop -controlled intersections along the interior North/South Loop Road intersections. The target minimum level of service to be maintained throughout the study area is Level of Service D. All intersections along the North/South Loop Road are proposed to provide full access with openings in the median. Typical proposed geometrics at intersections include a left -turn lane and a through/right lane on the loop road approaches and a R 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 114 11 295 RORIPAUGH RANCH — NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PA -14 653.0•• s PA -27 PA -22 -j190 190 PA -32 RORIPAUGH RANCH — NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PA -14 653.0•• s PA -27 PA -22 PA -15 489 PA -28 LOOP VOW PA -29 -30 PA -31 LONC Vq LLEY V/q 5N \ yS�{ SOUTH LOOP ROAD PA -24 "B" STREET "C"' ST EET PA -23 i 1 221 PA -21197 164 STREET PA -20 157 A NTS A AM PEAK HOUR TWO-WAY 489 LINK VOLUME 155 ^nom L23 r1 PA -18 + �" 1 15 w 40y�1} f - p 261 o M v' 126 PA -25 EXHIBIT 3A NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD AAA PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT AND ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES PAGE' -j190 190 00 L2 21J tO 'n -- 254 64 , '.) } r� 51 N^.- Capl i- 692 144 J t/ \ ?�T Ne /0 139 } 1' '?%, ��86 151 �iaN PA -16 FV TOREPA -17 Sr 405 RErE ..Lj.1REEi 9•, PA -15 489 PA -28 LOOP VOW PA -29 -30 PA -31 LONC Vq LLEY V/q 5N \ yS�{ SOUTH LOOP ROAD PA -24 "B" STREET "C"' ST EET PA -23 i 1 221 PA -21197 164 STREET PA -20 157 A NTS A AM PEAK HOUR TWO-WAY 489 LINK VOLUME 155 ^nom L23 r1 PA -18 + �" 1 15 w 40y�1} f - p 261 o M v' 126 PA -25 EXHIBIT 3A NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD AAA PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT AND ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES PAGE' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS -N- A NTS 9 PM PEAK HOUR TWO-WAY 576 LINK VOLUME EXHIBIT 3B NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT AND ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES PAGE 8 RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FU TYRE STREET' -N- A NTS AVERAGE 24-HOUR DAILY 51300 TRAFFIC VOLUME (0.37) VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO (BASED ON LOS D CAPACITY) EXH®IT 4 NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC AND CAPACITY RATIOS PAGE 9 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Van Dell and Associates, Inc. Roripaugh Ranch — North/South Loop Road March 2006 Traffic Analysis City of Temecula, California single egress lane on the stop -controlled side street access. The results of peak hour level of service analysis for North/South Loop Road intersections are shown on Table 2. Table 2 shows that with forecast am and pm peak hour traffic volumes all interior intersections along the North/South Loop Road are anticipated to operate at Level of Service C or better. Level of service calculations for each intersection are included in Appendix B. Averane Daily Traffic (ADT) Analysis Exhibit 4 shows forecast weekday 24-hour average daily traffic (ADT) volumes and volume to capacity (v/c) ratios along the North/South Loop Roadway. All volume to capacity ratios shown on Exhibit 4 are based on Level of Service D daily capacity for a two-lane divided roadway as identified by the Riverside County Road Department. Therefore, a v/c ratio of 1.00 or below indicates a roadway operating at Level of Service D or better based on 24-hour traffic volumes. Exhibit 4 shows that the highest ADT on North Loop Road is approximately 7,000 vehicles per day with a volume to capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.47. The highest ADT on South Loop Road is approximately 3,800 vehicles per day with a volume to capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.25. Based on these low volume to capacity ratios, Level of Service B is predicted to be typical for North Loop Road and Level of Service A is predicted to be typical for South Loop Road. VII. NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD GATED ACCESS QUEUING ANALYSIS The gated entrance on North Loop Road approximately 2,975 feet east of Butterfield Stage Road and on South Loop Road approximately 525 feet east of Butterfield Stage Road have been designed in accordance with Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Figures 4- 5 and 4-18B, respectively. A queuing analysis has been performed to confirm that each gated access has appropriate queuing (stacking) area for forecast entry volumes. The forecast pm peak hour arrival volume at the North Loop Road entry gate is 293 vehicles and 254 vehicles at the South Loop Road entry gate. Based on a 95% confidence level, the required vehicle stacking area at the North Loop Road entry gate is 100 feet (4 vehicles and 75 feet (3 vehicles) at the South Loop Road entry gate. Both entry gate 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Van Dell and Associates, Inc March 2006 Ronpaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road Traffic Analysis City of Temecula, California TABLE 2 Level of Service at North/South Loop Road Intersections AM Peak Hour Intersection 1. North Loop RoadP'Q" Street 2. North Loop Roadf'U" Street 3. North Loop Road/Future Street 4. North Loop RoadP'A" Street 5. North Loop Roadf'T" Street 6. South Loop Road/"H" Street 7. South Loop, RoadP'G" Street 8. South Loop RoadP'C"Street 9. South Loop Roadi"B" Street 10. South Loop RoadP'A" Street AM Peak Hour Delay (Sec.) LOS 15.5 C 10.2 B 10.4 B 10.5 B 9.2 A 9.0 A 9.2 A 9.8 A 9.1 A 10.8 B X'. Wmjecls1050_0139iEog1TechOealRepOnsliralfic Analysis Repon6preadsneelsVTable 02 LOS xlsjSheelI 11 PM Peak Hour Delay (Sec.) LOS 23.8 C 9.7 A 12.6 B '12.0 B 9.8 A 9.4 A 9.5 A 10.5 B 8.9 A 12.2 B I L' 11 1 1 11 Van Dell and Associates, Inc. Ronpaugh Ranch — North/South Loop Road March 2006 Traffic Analysis City of Temecula, California locations provide the necessary vehicle stacking area assuming that vehicles queued (stacked) at the gate or arriving at the gate simultaneously can proceed through the gate with a single actuation. The gate system at each location should be designed to accommodate approximately 300 vehicles per hour with an average service time of 12 seconds per vehicle during the pm peak hour. The gate queuing analysis for each location is included in Appendix C. VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed land uses adjacent to and served by the North/South Loop Roadway are estimated to generate an average of 13,211 vehicle trips per weekday with a maximum ADT on North and South Loop Roads of 7,000 and 3,800 vehicles per day, respectively, just east of Butterfield Stage Road. The proposed configuration of North/South Loop Road as a two-lane divided roadway will accommodate these volumes at a high level of service, predicted to be Level of Service C or better. The median along North/South Loop Road will be a landscaped raised median and striped on -street bike lanes will be provided. Traffic signal warrants were analyzed for all interior intersections along the loop roadway and no locations require signalization. Peak hour turning movement volumes were analyzed at each loop road intersection and all locations are predicted to operate at Level of Service C or better during both the am and pm peak hours. Proposed left -turn lane storage lengths are adequately sized for forecast left -turn volumes with appropriate spacing between intersections. A queuing analysis has confirmed that the gated entry locations on North and South Loop Roads have appropriate queuing areas for stacking vehicles at the gates and the gate system should accommodate up to 300 vehicles per hour at each location. Exhibit 5 provides a summary of recommended North/South Loop Road intersection geometrics, intersection controls, and roadway configurations. Exhibits 6A through 6F provide the median configuration and signing and striping details for the proposed North/ South Loop Road improvements. 12 II PA -32 RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PA -14 \ 2D .. •QEET PA -27 PA -22 "A'. STREET J- T 4- .. 51REEt •'U PA -15 NO'aTN PA -28 PA -16 ,OPO PA -29 —30 ' PA -17 ST%7E-ET LEGEND ■ 2 — NO. OF THROUGH TRAVEL LANES D — DIVIDED ROADWAY — SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION (PER SEPARTE STUDY) — STOP CONTROLLED INTERSECTION APPROACH — PROPOSED LANE PA -31 PA 26N L�oA q o LONG Vq LLEY ' W45Iy PA -24 t� SOUTH LOOP ROAD 5 ••B" STREET "C•• ST ET PA -23 i i 20 II PA -21 "G• STREET PA -20 T '- PA -18 w 1 w 1} 1 A NTS EXHIBIT 5 NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION GEOMETRICS, CONTROLS AND ROADWAY CONFIGURATION PAGE 13 ©UTTERFIELO STAGE ROAD SCC 5/FCCI NF %AN - twl-096[0 st- mill ll�,� rota r, III III$ I11 �I*L 0 RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS o -,© 'A' SrREE IBM����vr SIFft/ %ANS Mb SIMM4L HANS PFR LLb,_�S�o gO.wm SWM ICG° RM I 32 / � NI. i9s.niz eulrz.Pnao sIA¢ro FA -1 — J _rs.9se9 souLH a' smctl FA —21 SOUTH LOOP ROAD FUTURE STREET V STREET r, U PAMI wru PLR am J9. MLmws 5m PIAN "°' J UU I H L Uyr lYvii U O P. 19NC ( PER IXI t 134 GL 5 5L0 F NCG 16 OJ OI P.LLNI $MC IANC KR G AW6 SM f M AFfE P., 9YC. h9r/D PCR ( LP/.NS 5" R ANC yQ L �W44 OS INSGL(RIMIPRlS C0L2tNLfl KR GL1R 5105 J f x �� © WSW[ CNNU'CLLINC LILAC P(F IXfM Y /IKAUJffASLT/, Cl[LAAhS SLM➢4cJ HAM AJW' SNI � 4 9/9LG OJ MSINI W N A W (P4PLWYASLK) PCR CAtl S 5/AN!4P0 PCNL 12M i IR4lR O NSULL TMP' ML Efil.W.PAW.S (IMRM SIC) PER [XL 51.wN.Po HAN ANO I IF LIIFI (/NC (Il/CR4LY#/SLK) P(A G(1R1M SIAMYMJ % / ,E. N I� MSIA(L RI 5 µ Po51 KR CITY IF IEYLC4U SMNp A9 $ I0J I4I1. ANO 10.5 lO MS1A(I !%I'GW$C YELIOW Mfg SlA PER XMI 19, 4AIR S SIANOWO H A" QA t MSIA(L RL-IApII-J SYN COMRUN PCR GLIRANS SM0 .. rs,, Ts or IX PIKS a 1111 um/ OCG4 2 16 IF MIAM JB (INCRMONAAK) J40 L! .0[14'[ J9 xa fF OCIM JY 6Ltl IF MC.%/OMASLK PIK4CNIA WMGS I35 5C 12-wre SIRIF 65 IF sv, (Po51) N CA I I .o' 0 IO90' 120' SGLE. I- - m' EXHIBIT 6A NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD SIGNING AND STRIPING DETAILS r^uC Y ���1-22 RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC. ANALYSIS iol —23 FUTURE STREET "C" STREET / 11I -2) - Y'SOW—__ SOUTH LOOP ROAD P,/I - 241 11 FUTURE STREET "C" STREET P,11 —20 CONSTRUCTION NOTES' O1 P.4N/ wr 1 R CCGS l9. CALI SN MA4 AIIX{ O2 P*V/ WE L E KP O At JA G RMS 510 RA4 AJC10 O PANT PMC UN"' R GV)RANS sN PUN NIC. © PAN) &ME GNC iRRONS PFR G1l 5 STO PUN NI[ OS NSGLL RMIS8/ CWRIMT N 5H PER GURANS 510'$ © NSIALL CMNNRW4 LWE PER WTAIZ m (NKRMOGUS/KJ, GL TRANS s1mwO PUN NCO O, rNS/AU /IPC N ARMW (Akfll/MU$/Kf PER Gt TAMS 5% NCIRC PUN NIA O NSMU $[6P' PA KYCNC WlG S (INCRY SX) PER UL TRANS SrA ,, PUN 1210 O9 NSM 1. Lf (11/CRKryAs1K/ PER ue/RAM5 s/ANQ P NIE I@ N5/A11 R1 5G AN9 M51 PER C1ry OF !Wj. Sf. 6 0 n $ IOJ, 101 110 105 lO WSG11 111' MWC MLOW YLO1W StR PER OE! M 29 L /Rµ$ S/AhL4Po F N NOO Q WS/ALf R1 -,/WI -J SXN CWVMr01 qR 011 5SMT SOUTH LOOP RO t5nl/.a1Cs or ouANnnrt auM+n/r uro1 DEW 22 CC/A0. JB (INEPYOPUSM) 19I [F alm J9 2810 [F DC'S lY Kd 1! /N(Ruaasx a<scurll uwgvcs ls1 5! 5ry (Msp 2, u � N .o 0 10' so ' 120' SCALE: I- = 00' EXHIBIT 6B NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD SIGNING AND STRIPING DETAILS HAUL 75 Pel -20 RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS n = Pr] -25 gcz r i FUTURE STREET H, STREET �y 0 Pr/1-25 V SOUTH LOOP ROAD TR FL w.RS TRE T[i P('R tgyl-�Y,B FYAMf ErJI 11 _M eGq° FO _ J O'sMCC! Pel -27 NORTH LOOP ROAD 0 GQdSTRUCTION NOTES: OI 1.1 RIC L/nC PP LX%/C JJ, 4YIN S SW %M' 'I D G,r PCR OC/N J9 (X /R</4 SN FYAN /Ipl OJ P M/ 8vC ime PCR G,I SRI PLµ , 2< Oi P.IN'r 8,,r ONE aRN w PCR ut/ s sm PGM ANC OJ IMS/XL RI60/P91 CGMBiIN/lON SIC, PCR Cel Mµs sm5 © MSCNL CI4NNCLJZI/ I.E PCR O llt JB (MCRNOPGSIKI. G1.15 51.IUR PUN A" M51.1 MC f! All,W (MCRN SM') PER G1.15 Stl p %/N A}M. O9 NSINL Y/OP" PAKK,! wRYMLs (MCRVII USIK) PCR LLL/RWs 5IAN FYµ AI4D O3 IMSGLL I." twC (IMLRW SXJ PER GL - 51 v Rl PUN ANC I� MINI RI S" 1h MSI PER CIN V /arcw Sl I I s AN, .a. A.M 10 I© a4IA[t F%F"CdUB[F IRLO/ ✓[dery SIRIPC PCR CC]M S9 VL SuvGM Mµ AXp Q /4IH[ RF-]/G✓I-J 5GN CG/&n'.e PCP G[LGrvS sm'S cl."5 c at las dMMnI. rIN/' xI t 29 SJ Lr XIAI J9 'A LI iIKRVOI s/ PA Wll I411INGS 109 51 p' NM/C s/RIPC )) 1t sc gas') IA c< 40 0 ap' tl0' Izo' sGLE: I' - 40' EXHIBIT 6C NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD SIGNING AND STRIPING DETAILS PAGE 161 % Z RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS /c,A-27 NORTH LOOP ROAD Pl/l —?3 EUSTREET V 1 f„ �~ o ri A I .c "U" 5iREE7 FA — I J S m ¢ W 1 O 0 N Prl — —p 6 1Q r- L]�..16,1 _ LM✓ RO CONSTRUCTION NOTES: NORTH LOOP ROAO O PALM RE UNC PCR OEIM J9, G, m -s sw PUN '20 Q Pow &N£ GM PCR O w JAl GL IMvs SZ P(.W A100 OJ PNN! vM£ IANC' PER GURU'S sN PUN ANf © MINI BMC UN£ ARR - PCR f 1RAN5 sN PUN 121C. " OS P6WL R160/R81 C SomR S.CN PER GLL S 50'S © M51ML CLNNNCUPI LWC PER OE Y (MCRAK SIC),, CALIRIIS SIMM to PUN 120 O) M Nl TWE 11 ARROW (RIEMN Sl2) P£R Gl MANS SIANLNMJ FUN A]U O MSIALL $IOP' PAKN£N! A4P.IXS (fvCRAA.nASIK) PER L IMNS SflN RD %AN A210 O9 M51K1 I—W (MERUOM SX) KR G IMW S)ANOARO PLW AIC. o6111 RL S ANO Poll PCR CLIP CY ICKCLU SCINY.Po MJ Y I0{ IOI, M'0 10.5 L© Nlsl'[[ Re -71W 1-J S N CGv&/U! PCR GL N5 5105 1© lNS1Af[ RJ -JA,, -J SCN co & lK PEA G nu5!0'S Esnwlcs a<oLUNnncs owvnfr INL! Cfp/L JB (IKRVJPI/SnCf 161 (( OEIM Js 1867 (E OEG2 J9A 70( L7 fNCRMOPU512 Mp VTNI IURff�S 10/ 5! 12"W E SNIIE 15 (! 5/LN (Posr) 11 EF r N .o' 0 .o' do' 120' scue I' = Ao' EXHIBIT 6D NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD SIGNING AND STRIPING DETAILS PAGE 17 La i J Pel—l/ ruREE7i r S RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NORTH LOOP ROAD / ,/j — / Ir xo-rt Je (�[Ruc/".ns:zl /a• o i rcnASrr "'Ar" ."Icy n' A-1 V111E � � J 0 a/ .o Oz. x eL' Ila' ? � state r' = m' q' w CONSTRUCAON N0111 : All /V�1 O PIM/ B,/E UNC IV 00n/( J9, C ,-AAIS 5/0. RAI 120 �P O FI4+1 a'Arr [ ,f PIB w,,,, lY GIIPARS 5/0 MAI. x U PUN! P,,r "If iCR cAlm"s LO RA, N2 O� .18"r (,NE A>POAS' PCR G(.•PAVS Sip i I RI,C l'l w51a[< R2501P31 Cpud:W/KN s PCP G[/P s 5/95 V/SIK! C14':.4,(IIitiG [NC PCO 0!/A[ 19 (/�vCPNUF(AS/K), GINAIF 5/1'IY10 HIN A) Ol Wslq, IY C I AlR l (llffl P45/2) PCB G11BAv5 5LN000 P[AN nlu. U/, ws , $1pP P<dvpA 0,R ms ("E"a sm PER cA,-Is S'A zAN a HfqJp V w5G([ (/un [rrvF (/hCPu0PU9K) N' G1 /RIN5 5Iz'/UPo RA112¢ Q a1Sllll 11 5F•, 1,10 POS: Ml WY On ICUCCUV Vu NO 5 4i1 ,0( M0 105 11S1y1 ,/,-CC RC ?(1Ory uM.1 5111r PCP a/n¢ 19, PUPv4 5Lw:4P0 ps,v AX,& u/5W[ 9,-I/^.v1a 5*1 c0u01.W R RR arRAvs 510'5 PAGE 18 nq � � i � � J P� \ i 10 `` ♦`J�J I�9J N tP'J RO Oj � � `` ?� J 1 O EXHIBIT 6E NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD SIGNING AND STRIPING DETAILS � N OR LH LOOP ROADe PAGE 18 RORIPAUGH RANCH - NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS �lµfI 9] NII[MIO S IL. !]13.15 tI FUiURE 5(FEEi ! .1. 51.eEE1 ! 1 � I NORTH LOOP ROAD CONSTPUCnav NOFEs Ql P 19V( UM P(P Cf/ '-19. GI1P rv5 5/P PUN nTCO CM! ) ellf UM I'llOCIII( J9/, GI IPI15 5/0 % l A100 O ..I 'OdC UM'PC9 (p(I,VryS 110 PUN AT/C OI PAM'! &AL UN( }1215' P(R GI.IS 510 PGI /T/C O INSrAll 1160/191 00.8.101 SCI P;'.9 C IRINS SNS © 44SGII CNWICINNG (WC PCR OCIa1 M (INFIYGPUfIKJ. Gl MAIS 5!1104101111200. O/ 115.(( 1 N AA ,. /ln(1u0PU5/Kf PER GUR1N5 51M 0 PTAH 12. O A51A(( YW' ©r IICN! WRY/NGS (!l/!I.'YOPUSIK) PCI GllPA.45 51A 10 %AN Ii10 C SU(( or (1M (INCPNGP(ASIKJ IF1 GL 11145 5.NOARO P N A24C 1@ M5/AI( RI S ANO PoS! PC1 Clb 01 ICUCCt SMIAO Y 10; 104 A40 105 IQi MS.I( 111'0 IC TIJC. MCCUN 511MC PCR OC.tt 29. G11Po.45 511M. l0 FUN 1109 I© wS III! 14-11G'-1 521 lI..I2N PFR 0111/15 SIDS [$1p41F5 I, 01 I I'll I IXMNI/!Y VMI CCa N //MIKWISICJ !65 1C XW l9 6Z !! MI. JY 10 IF INCINCNASM PAi{Y(.4! Y/FMN:( I[0 SF 12'X1pZE $/PIPE 15 IF 521 (PoSI) 9 G 40 0 10' 60' VO' SCa1C 1' 10' EXHIBIT 6F NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD SIGNING AND STRIPING DETAILS --�-Z PAGE 19 % I I APPENDIX A ' TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS 1 I X'.%Projeds%850_01391Eng\TechDocs%RepodslTrraKc Analysis Repornappediv Divider doc AM PEAR HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:44:05 Page 3-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula --------------------------- __--_ __-_-------_-__------_--__-- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Rural] Intersection k8 "Q" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) xx+++x++x+x+x++xxxx+++x++++xx+++++++xx+++x++++++++++x+xxxx+++++++xx++++++x+++x++ Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ----__--_-----_ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- I--------------- --------------- ---___-__-----_ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 39 4 23 4 11 54 19 139 151 69 252 2 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- I--------------- -__-_--I Major Street Volume: 632 Minor Approach Volume: 69 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 227 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE F ' PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:48:43 -Page 3-1 _______ p _ _--- _--- _---- _-------- ____ Rori auh _ Ranch North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ___________ _ _______ Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] Int»er»sect*on #8 "Q" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- _________-_____I ' Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- _______________ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 120 12 78 3 7 36 62 270 62 45 175 5 ----- _----- _I_______________I_______________I______________________________ Major Street Volume: 619 Minor Approach Volume: 210 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 232 1 I Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) ' Major Street: North Loop Road ' Minor Street: "Q" Street 1 I .1 U I1 NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. IX:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TechDocs\Reports\Traffic Analysis Report\Trafric Signal Warrants.doe Minimum Requirements URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both approaches) higher -volume minor street approach (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Urban Rural Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street 1 ......................... 1........................ 8,000 5,600 2,400 , 1,680 2 or more... 7000.... 1.........1550.......... 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 ........................... 2ormore................ 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 1 ......................... I........................ 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more... 7000.... 1.........1550.......... 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 1 ........................... 2ormore................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following 2 Warrants 2 Warrants warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 1 I 1 2 NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. IX:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TechDocs\Reports\Traffic Analysis Report\Trafric Signal Warrants.doe AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:44:05 Page 3-2 __________________ ___ Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ________________ g p________ __ _______ Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] xxwxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxwwwxxwwr+wxwwxwxwwwwwwww++++++.+wxx.xwww++++++++++++x.+xxwwx++ ' Intersection +#9+*U*+STREET +(NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) x++++x++xxxxxww+w++++++++++xxxxx++++++++++++x++xxx Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ --------------- I--------------- I--------------- ________-______ ' Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- I--------------- _______________I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ' Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 5 0 68 23 144 0 0 254 2 ------------ --------------- I--------------- I--------------- II__-_ Major Street Volume: 423 Minor Approach Volume: 73 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 320 11 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 11 1 1 [1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 1 PM PEAK HOUR- Toe Mar 14, 2006 11:48:43 ___---- _---- Page 3-2 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road _______ ' City of Temecula ------ __________________ _________________ Peak Hour Volume Si nal Warrant Re ort[Rural] 4 p xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx+++xxxx+xx+x+xxxxxxx+xx«x«xx+++++++++xxxxxxx«x+x++x+++xxxxxxxx Intersection #9 "U" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) ++++++++++++++++++xxxx+x+xxxx+x+++++++++++xxxxxxxxxx+x+++++++xxxxxxx+xx+x+++++++ Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound ______________-� West Bound ' Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- ___I_______________I__________-__________________________________I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 45 78 274 0 0 181 5 ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11_______________� Major Street Volume: 538 Minor Approach Volume: 48 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 265 1 1 [1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: North Loop Road Minor Street: "U" Street 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 1 2 2 Warrants 1 2 Warrants NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TechDms\Repons\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.dm Minimum Requirements URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both approaches) higher -volume minor street approach (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Urban Rural Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street 1......4400 ............. 1......650............ 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2ormore.........:....... 1......................... 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 ........................... 2ormore................ 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 1.........4400.......... 1.........650......... 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2ormore................. 1......................... 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 2onnore................. 2ormore................ 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 1 ........................... 26rmore................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 1 2 2 Warrants 1 2 Warrants NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TechDms\Repons\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.dm I 11 1 1 11 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 AM PEAK HOUR_ Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:44:05 Page 3-3 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road ' City of Temecula _______________________________________ Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] #10 FUTURE STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) «Intersection Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ___________________________ --------------- 11--------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound _______________� West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- ___I_______________I_______-_______I_______________I_______-_______I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Final Vol.: 2 0 1 0 0 63 21 64 5 2 190 0 ----- ______________________II_______________I_______________I_______________I Major Street Volume: 282 Minor Approach Volume: 63 ' Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 413 11 1 1 11 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:48:43 Page 3-3 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ------------------------------------------------------ ` -------------_--------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Rural] Intersection #10 FUTURE STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- --__-----------� Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- I--------------- II -__----_------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 8 0 2 0 0 42 72 216 5 1 125 0 ------------ I--------------- II---------------- I--------------- _-----_-____-__I Major Street Volume: 419 Minor Approach Volume: 42 Minor. Approach Volume Threshold: 322 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 1 [1 1 1 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: North Loop Road Minor Street: Future Street URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... 1. Minimum Vehicular Satisfied Number of lanes for m approach Major Street I......................... 2 or more... 3300.... 2ormore................. 1 ........................... Not Satisfied XX on each Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one direction only) Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 ........................ 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 1.........550.......... 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2ormore................ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 2ormore................ 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied Not Satisfied XX Number of lanes for moving traffic on approach Major Street I........................ 2 or more... 3300.... 2 ormore ................. 1 .......................... 3. Combination Minor Street 1 ........................ I .........550.......... 2ormore................ 2ormore................ Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fulfilled 80`70 or more......... 1 2 Vehicles per day on major street (total of both approaches) Urban Rural 12,000 8,400 14,400 10,080 14,400 10,080 12,000 8,400 2 Warrants Vehicles per day on higher -volume minor street approach (one direction only) Urban Rural 1,200 850 1,200 850 1,600 1,120 1,600 1,120 2 Warrants NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\Technocs\Repons\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.doc [1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE AM -PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 09:50:08 Page 3-9 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road _ City of Temecula ________________ __------- ------ ------- Peak Hour Volume Signal_Warrant_Report_[Rural)__________________ +«++xx+x++++xx«x+++++«+«x««+++++xx+x«+x++++x«++++++++++«xx+++++x««xx+++++x+««+++ Intersection #11 "A" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) ' ++xx+++«x«x«xx++++++++++xxx«+x+++«+«xx++++++x+x«+++++««xxx+++++««««+x+++ Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ' Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- ___I______________________________I_______________I_______________ L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Final Vol.: 36 0 0 30 0 69 23 29 12 _________ _______11_______________11 0 86 10 MajorStreet Volume: 160 --------------- _ _-___Major Minor Approach Volume: 99 Minor -Approach Volume Threshold: 544 [1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 1 1 1 PM PEAK HOUR- - Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:31 - Page 3-9 _______ ________________________ -___ Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ____--___-________________________________________________ Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] Intersection #11 "A" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met --------------- --------------- I--------------- _______________I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- I--------------- --------------- II --------------- Control: __ --__Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 24 0 0 20 0 46 79 98 41 0 56 34 ------------ --------------- I--------------- I--------------- II --------------- Major __--__ _Major Street Volume: 308 Minor Approach Volume: 66 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 393 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE ' TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: North Loop Road ' Minor Street: "A" Street 1 11 ' NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\Techl) cs\Reports\Traffic Analysis Repon\Traffic Signal WarrantsAm 1 Minimum Requirements URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach direction only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural I ......................... 1........................ 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 or more... 2000.... 1.........850.......... 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 ........................... 2ormore................ 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 1 ......................... 1........................ 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more... 2000.... 1.........850.......... 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 1 ........................... 2ormo re ................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following 2 Warrants 2 Warrants warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 1 2 ' NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\Techl) cs\Reports\Traffic Analysis Repon\Traffic Signal WarrantsAm 1 I AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 09:50:08- Page 3-10 -- ---- _--- _--- _---- _-------- Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road ' City of Temecula ______________ g _____________P [ ------------------- Peak Hour Volume Si nal Warrant Re ort Rural 1 ' Intersection #12 NORTH LOOP ROAD (N/S) / "T" STREET (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- ___I_______________I_______________I_______________I_______________ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ' Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 9 33 5 8 38 13 40 0 26 15 0 23 ----- ______________________II______________________________I_______________ Major Street Volume: 106 ' Minor Approach Volume: 66 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 613 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 1 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE [I PM PEAK HOUR- Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:31 Page 3-10 _ _____ --- --- - Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road _____ ' -City of Temecula ______________________ __________________ ______________ _-_______ _ _ Peak-Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Rural] ' Intersection #12 NORTH LOOP ROAD (N/S) / "T" STREET (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- --------------- II--------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound _________--____I West Bound ' Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- --------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign I_______________ Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Final Vol.: 29 49 17 26 46 46 26 0 17 _------ 10 0 15 ------------ I--------------- I-------- --------------- Major Street Volume: 213 I_-_____________ Minor Approach Volume: 43 ' Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 463 1 1 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE [I I 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 k TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: North Loop Road Minor Street: "T" Street URBAN ............. 1. Minimum Vehicular Satisfied Not Satisfied XX Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach major street (total of both Major Street Minor Street 1 ......................... 1 ........................ 2 or more ... 1600.... 1.........550.......... 2ormore.......... :...... 2ormore ................ 1 ........................... 2ormore ................ 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied Not Satisfied XX Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach major street (total of both Major Street Minor Street 1 ......................... 1 ........................ 2 or more ... 1600.... 1.........550.......... 2ormore................. 2ormore ................ I........................... 2ormore................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 0 I Minimum Requirements EADT major street (total of both Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one approach (one direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 2 Warrants I 2 Warrants NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TcchDocs\Reports\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.doe I 1 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE AM PEAK HOUR_ Tue Mar 14, 2006 09:50:08 ________--- _--- _---- _-------- Page 3-5 _________________---- Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road _--- ___ ' City of Temecula ___ ___________________ Peak Hour__ Volume Signal Warrant Re ort Rural g Report Intersection #6 "H" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ___________________________ --------------- 11--------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound _______________� West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- __________________I_______________II_______________I_______________I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 5 0 6 9 0 33 11 32 2 2 73 3 Major Street Volume: 123 Minor Approach Volume: 42 Minor -Approach Volume Threshold: 604 I 1 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 1 1 1 1 1 u PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006-10:17-30 _-__ -Page 3-5 ______________________________ -__ Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ---------------------------------------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural) ##*1**f**1f*#YY++*+*;*****f***f*******+*+++;;***rt*f+#Y#*+*+*;f***#Y*#*+*******#Y Intersection #6 "H" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- --------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound I____ ________--_______ East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L ___________________________ - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign --------------- I_______ Uncontrolled -_______I Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 3 0 4 ------------ 6 0 22 38 86 6 7 56 10 --------------- --------------- Major Street Volume: II--------------- 203 II_______________I Minor Approach Volume: 28 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 489 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I ' TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) ' Major Street: South Loop Road ' Minor Street: '°H" Street 1 1 1 1 1 ' NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. 1 X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\Techl)ocs\Rcports\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.doc �1 Minimum Requirements URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... EADT I. Minimum Vehicular Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach direction only) Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 ......................... I ............... ......... 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2.or more... 2000.... 1.........365.......... 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1. .......................... 2ormore................ 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 1 ......................... 1........................ 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more... 2000.... 1.........365.......... 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 1 ........................... 2ormore................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following 2 Warrants 2 Warrants warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 1 2 ' NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. 1 X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\Techl)ocs\Rcports\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.doc �1 AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 09:50:08 Page 3-4 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula --------------------------- -_-----------------_------------- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Rural] «x«««++++«++xx««++++x««xx««++x+xxxxxxx++++x«+++++xxxx«+++xxxx++++x«+x««++++++x«+ Intersection #5 "G" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) +xx««««««+++x++«++«++x+xx««x«++x+xxx+++++x+x«x«x+++++x+x«x+++x+«x+++++«xxx+++xxx Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ -'---- --------------- --------------- -------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ -----_-_---__-------_-_I-----_------_-_-----_-_-----_-I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 44 3 0 112 0 ------------ ------------------------------ _-------------- ------------_--� Major Street Volume: 159 Minor Approach Volume: 8 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 545 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE ' PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:30 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3-4 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Rural) Intersection #5 "G" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met --------------- II--------------- --------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound I_______________I West Bound ' Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- L - T - R I--------------- --------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled I_______________' Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Final Vol.: 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 129 9 ----- ______________________II______________________________�_______________I. 1 60 0 Major Street Volume: 219 Minor Approach Volume: 6 ' Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 471 1 H 1 1 I ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I I 1 1 1 1 11 C 1 1 [1 1 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: South Loop Road Minor Street: "G" Street URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... 1. Minimum Vehicular higher -volume Satisfied Not Satisfied XX minor street Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach approach (one Major Street Minor Street 1 ......2100 ............. 1 ......75............ 2ormore................. 1......................... 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 1 ........................... 2ormore ............... . 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied Not Satisfied XX Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street 1 .........2100.......... I .........75......... 2ormore................. I ......................... 2otlrtore................. 2ormore ................ 1 ........................... 2ormore ................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 2 Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) 850 minor street 1,120 1,600 approach (one direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 Vehicles per day on major street (total of both approaches) 12,000 14,400 14,400 12,000 2 Warrants Rural 8,400 10,080 10,080 8,400 Vehicles per day on higher -volume minor street approach (one direction only) Urban Rural 1,200 850 1,200 850 1,600 1,120 1,600 1,120 2 Warrants NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850-0139Eng\Techl)ms\Reports\Traffic Analysis ReportUraffic Signal warrants.doc I AM PEAK HOUR- Tue Mar 14, 2006 09:50:08 - Page 3-3 _-__-____________________ -___ k 1 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road of Temecula -City _____ — ______________P____[ — --------_-__ Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] Intersection #4 "C" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) ' Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met --------------- I--------------- II--------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound __-_-__________ West Bound ' Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- L - T - R --------------- --------------- Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled I___________-___ Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Final Vol.: 7 0 0 4 0 22 8 42 2 ------------ --------------- 0 117 1 I--------------- I--------------- Major Street Volume: 170 I______________-. ' Minor Approach Volume: 26 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 530 k 1 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:30-- ---- _______ _--- _---- _-------- Page 3-3 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ' ---- _---- ------ _------- _-_P______-- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Rural] ' Intersection +#4+"C" STREET IN/S) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ___________________________ _______________11_______________ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound _-_ West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________________________I_____________________________________________ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Final Vol.: 4 0 0 2 0 15 26 135 7 1 81 4 _________________________________________________________I_______________ Major Street Volume: 254 Minor Approach Volume: 17 ' . Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 437 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: South Loop Road Minor Street: "C" Street URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... 1. Minimum Vehicular Satisfied Number of lanes for m approach Major Street 1 ......................... 2 or more... 2600.... 2ormore................. 1 ........................... Not Satisfied XX on Minor Street 1 ........................ 1.........225.......... 2ormore................ 2ormore................ 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied Not Satisfied XX Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach . Vehicles per day on Major Street Minor Street I......................... 1 ........................ 2 or more... 2600.... 1.........225.......... 2ormore................. 2ormore ................ 1 ........................... 2ormore................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX Vehicles per day on Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one Urban Rural direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 9000 6,720 3,200 2,240 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one direction only) Urban Rural Urban Rural 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 No one warrant satisfied, but following 2 Warrants 2 Warrants warrants fulfilled 80%n or more......... U 2 NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TechDocs\Reports\Traffic Analysis Report\TrafGe Signal Warrants dw ' AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 09:50:08_ Page 3-2 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road ' City of Temecula- ____ _____________________________ Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural) ' Intersection 11 "B" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ___________________________ --------------- II--------------- ______--_______I ' Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ______________________________________________________________I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled t Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 1 0 19 7 51 0 0 145 0 ------------ I--------------- I--------------- --------------- ______-________I Major Street Volume: 203 ' Minor Approach Volume: 20 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 489 1 1 1 1 11 I Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:30 Page 3-2 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula __--------------- ___ -____---- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] Intersection #3 "B" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ --------------- I--------------- II --------------- --------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II------------------------------ II --------------- Control: __ _Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 1 0 12 21 168 0 0 97 1 ------------ --- --------------- --------------- --------------- _____- . Major Street Volume: 287 Minor Approach Volume: 13 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 409 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: South Loop Road Minor Street: `B" Street URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... 1. Minimum Vehicular Satisfied Number of lanes for n approach Major Street 1 ......2800............ 2ormore................. 2ormore: ................ 1 .......................... Not Satisfied XX traffic on each Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street Minor Street approach (one Urbar I ......170............ Rural 8,000 1 ......................... 5,600 9,600 2ormore................ 6,720 9,600 2ormore ................ 6,720 8,000 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Satisfied Not Satisfied XX Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street I .........2800......... 2ormore ................. 2ormore................. 1 .......................... 3. Combination Minor Street I .........170......... 1 ........................ 2ormore ................ 2ormore................ Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... 1 2 Vehicles per day on major street (total of both approaches) Urban approach (one 12,000 direction only) Rural Urban Rural 5,600 2,400 1,680 6,720 2,400 1,680 6,720 3,200 2,240 5,600 3,200 2,240 Vehicles per day on major street (total of both approaches) Urban Rural 12,000 8,400 14,400 10,080 14,400 10,080 12,000 8,400 2 Warrants Vehicles per day on higher -volume minor street approach (one direction only) Urban Rural 1,200 850 1,200 850 1,600 1,120 1,600 1,120 2 Warrants NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\I'rojects\850_0139\Eng\TechDo s\Reports\9'raffic Analysis Repou\Traffic Signal Warrants.doc I ' AM PEAK HOUR- Tue Mar 14, 2006 09:50:08 _- Page 3-1 _______ --- _---- _-------- Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road city of Temecula ------------------------------------------------ ____ Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] ' Intersection +11 "A" STREET (N/SI / SOUTH LOOP ROAD IE/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ________________II_______________I_______________II_______________I ' Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ' Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Final Vol.: 7 0 0 2 0 51 17 55 2 0 163 1 _________________________________________________________I_______________ Major Street Volume: 238 t Minor Approach Volume: 53 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 452 [1 r 1 LI ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I ' PM PEAK HOUR_ Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:30 _______ _--- _---- _-------- Page 3-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula _---- ----- __------ _------- _------ ' Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Rural] ' Intersection #2 "A" STREET (N/S) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ___________________________ _______________ ---------------_______________� Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ' Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- ___I_______________II_____________________________________________ L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Final Vol.: 4 0 0 1 0 34 59 187 8 ----- ______________________I_______________I_______________�I_______________� 0 107 2 Major Street Volume: 363 Minor Approach Volume: 35 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 355 1 F I [L 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE LI I 1 1 1 1 F 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note) Major Street: South Loop Road Minor Street: "A" Street NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TechDms\Reports\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.doc Minimum Requirements URBAN ............. RURAL ... XX......... EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both approaches) higher -volume minor street approach (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 ......................... 1........................ 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 or more... 3800.... 1.........450...:...... 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 ........................... 2ormore................ 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on Vehicles per day on Satisfied Not Satisfied XX major street (total of both higher -volume approaches) minor street approach (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Urban Rural Urban Rural Major Street Minor Street 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 1 ......................... I .......... .............. 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more... 3800.... 1.........450.......... 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 2ormore................. 2ormore................ 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 1 ........................... 2ormore ................ 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied XX No one warrant satisfied, but following 2 Warrants 2 Warrants warrants fulfilled 80% or more......... NOTE: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. X:\Projects\850_0139\Eng\TechDms\Reports\Traffic Analysis Report\Traffic Signal Warrants.doc I 1 1 APPENDIX B ' INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPUTATION REPORTS (2000 HCM METHOD) p I ' X.1Projecls%850_01391En91Tech Docs%Repads\Traffic Analysis ReporvAppedix Divider doe I 1 AM PEAK HOUR- Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:44:05 Page 4-1 __________________ 1 1 1 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula 1-------------------------------------------------------- -----__________-----' ---- -- Level Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 1 Intersection Y.8 "Q" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 15.51 1 Street Name: "Q" STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 Control: - --- --- Stop Sign --------------- Stop Sign --------------- Uncontrolled ------ Uncontrolled -- Rights: Include Include include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 ----- Volume Module: --------------- ------ _ --- ------- Base Vol: 39 4 23 4 11 54 19 139 151 69 252 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Initial Bse: User Adj: 39 4 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1.00 11 -54 1.00 1.00 19 1.00. 139 151 1.00 1.00 69 1.00 252 1.00 2 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 39 4 23 4 11 54 19 139 151 69 252 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 39 4 23 4 11 54 19 139 151 69 252 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 1 F011owUpTim: __ 3.5 4.0 3.3 _______________ 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: _______________ _______________ ___________--__� Cnflict Vol: 676 645 215 657 719 253 254 xxxx xxxxx 290 xxxx xxxxx 1 Potent Cap.: 370 394 831 381 357 791 1323 xxxx xxxxx 1283 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 319 367 831 348 333 791 1323 xxxx xxxxx 1263 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap:, 0.12 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.01-xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx 'I --------------- Level Of Service Module: II ------- --------------- --------------- Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 410 xxxxx xxxx 611 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 15.5 xxxxx xxxxx 11.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * C * * B ApproachDel: 15.5 11.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C B * + 1 1 1 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 ' PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:48:43 Page 4-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ' _ --------------------------------------------------------- _______________ _---________________ Level Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ' Intersection #8 "Q" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 23.8] ' Street Name: "Q" STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign -------------- Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 '____ --------------- .Volume Module: ��--------------- ��--------------- ��--------------- Base Vol: 120 12 78 3 7 36 62 270 62 45 175 5 Growth Adj: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Initial Bse:. 120 12 78 3 7 36 62 270 62 45 175 5 ' User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 120 12 78 3 7 36 62 270 62 45 175 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: ----- _----- 120 12 78 ________________I_______________II______________________________I 3 7 36 62 270 62 45 175 5 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: __I_______ 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx .2.2 xxxx xxxxx ___--- Capacity Module: I_--- __--- ______II_--- _---- _----- ---- _---- ______ Cnflict Vol: 714 695 301 738 724 178 180 xxxx xxxxx 332 xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 349 368 743 336 355 871 1408 xxxx xxxxx M9 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 309 339 743 275 327 871 1408 xxxx xxxxx 1239 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.04 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.04 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: _____________ _____-------__� Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * } A # A ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 397 xxxxx xxxx 625 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 3.0 xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 23.8 xxxxx xxxxx 11.2 xxxxx xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: C * B ApproachDel: 23.8 11.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C B # # ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:44:05 Page 5-1 Rcripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ---------------------------- __-_------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #9 "U" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.21 Street Name: "U" STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- II--------`-----� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- _______________ --------------- __----_---_----I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 5 0 68 23 144 0 0 254 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 5 0 .68 23 144 0 0 254 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 5 0 68 23 144 0 0 254 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 5 0 68 23 144 0 0 254 2 ------------------------------------------ --------------- II --------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I--- ------------ I--------------- (_-_-------__-----_- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 445 xxxx 255 256 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 574 xxxx 789 1321 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 567 xxxx 789 1321 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.09 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I ---- --------------- ---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * + * A + + + + + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 768 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * B * * * + + + + ApproachDel: xxxxxx 10.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * B * + Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I I 1 PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:48:43 Page 5-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula -------------------------------------- _ __-__ __-- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #9 "U" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.77 x«x+xxx+xxxxx++++++«x«xx+«««x++x+xxxxx«xx+++xxxxxx«xx+++««+«xxx++++xx««+x«++«xxx Street Name: "U" STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- -__----I---------------II----_____-----_ Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- --- -------------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 3 0 45 78 274 0 0 181 5 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse:, 0 0 0 3 0 45 78 274 0 0 181 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 3 0 45 78 274 0 0 181 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 45 78 274 0 0 181 5 ------------ I --------------- --------------- _-------------- II ---------------I' Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I-------------7-II--------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 614 xxxx 184 186 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 459 xxxx 864 1401 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 439 xxxx 864 1401 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.05 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- --------------- 11-___-----___---� Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * + A x + x x x Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 815 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sharedpueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * x x ApproachDel: xxxxxx 9.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * A * « Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:44:05 Page 6-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula __ _ ________________ _-_--_---------__ _-_ _-__------__- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) a+++++++a+xxxxxr++r++rxx+rrxr+r+r++++xrrr+r++r++xxr+++++++«*xx+xr++++++xxxrr++++ Intersection #10 FUTURE STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) xrxxx+++xxrxr++ra++xx++rxr++++++++xxxr++aa+x+axxxa+++++++xx+++++++xxxrxr*++++xxx Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.41 xrxrrrrrxx++++++xxarra++++++aaxrrr++++++xrx++++++«www+ra++++xrrr++++++arrxrr+a++ Street Name: FUTURE STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------------I --------------- ---------------H------____-----I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 --------------- --------------- --------------- 11_-----_-__-----� Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 0 1 0 0 63 21 64 5 2 190 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial -Bse: 2 0 1 0 0 63 21 64 5 2 190 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 2 0 1 0 0 63 21 64 5 2 190 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 2 0 1 0 0 63 21 64 5 2 190 0 --------------------------- II --------------- ---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 334 xxxx 67 xxxx xxxx 190 190 xxxx xxxxx 69 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 623 xxxx 1003 xxxx xxxx 857 1396 xxxx xxxxx 1545 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 570 xxxx 1003 xxxx xxxx 857 1396 xxxx xxxxx 1545 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.07 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------ I--------------- ------------------------------ --------------- Level --_ _--Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.2 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.5 7.6 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A A * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 666 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 10.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * * + * * + + + + + ApproachDel: 10.4 9.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A * + Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE ' PM PEAK HOUR_- - -- Tue Mar -14, 2006-11:48:43 _ - -Page 6-1 ___---- _---- __ 1 u ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE Roripaugh Ranch - Morth/South Loop Road City of Temecula ' _----------- ______________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 'Intersection #10 FUTURE STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.6] ' Street Name: FUTURE STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 'I--------------- Control: Stop Sign --------------- Stop Sign --------------- Uncontrolled --------------- Uncontrolled Rights: Include I Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' 1--------------- Volume Module: --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Base Vol: 8 0 2 0 0 42 72 216 5 1 125 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse:, 8 0 2 0 0 42 72 216 5 1 125 0 ' User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 8 0 2 0 0 42 72 216 5 1 125 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 8 ----- ______________________II_______________II_______________II_______________I 0 2 -0 0 42 72 216 5 1 125 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: 3.5 ------------ _______________ xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx .2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: --------------- 11--------------- _______________� Cnflict Vol: 511 xxxx 219 xxxx xxxx 125 125 xxxx xxxxx 221 xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 477 xxxx 826 xxxx xxxx 931 1474 xxxx xxxxx 1360 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 438 xxxx 826 xxxx xxxx 931 1474 xxxx xxxxx 1360 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.05 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ' Level Of Service Module: ______________ --------------- ----___-------� Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.0 7.6 xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * A A . + A + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 483 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 12.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: B + ApproachDel: 12.6 9.0 ApproachLOS: B A xxxxxx + xxxxxx , 1 u ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:04:08 Page 10-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #11 "A" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B( 10.5) Street Name: "A" STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 36 0 0 30 0 69 23 29 12 0 86 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 36 0 0 30 0 69 23 29 12 0 86 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 36 0 0 30 0 69 23 29 12 0 86 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 36 0 0 30 0 69 23- 29 12 0 86 10 ---- - -----_- I --------------- --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ----__------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------i Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 207 xxxx xxxxx 172 xxxx 91 96 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 755 xxxx xxxxx 796 xxxx 972 1510 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 694 xxxx xxxxx 786 xxxx 972 1510 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx 0.07 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- ------- Level Of Service Module: Queue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 10.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * A * * + + w Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 907 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * A + * + + w ApproachDel: 10.5 9.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A + w Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:31 Page 12-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula -------_ -------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) x+ww++»wwxxx+++wxww++++wxw+wwwwwxx+++xwwww+++wwx«+.+www++wxxw»+w«xx++www«++www«+ Intersection #11 "A" STREET (NIS) / NORTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) ++++xxxxxx++wwww++xwww+++++wwxw+++wwww++++wwwx++wxwx++wwxx++xxx«+wwww«++wwxx++xw Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.0] w«xx+w+++wwwww»wwx+++wxwaw+»wwwxww++wwwr+++ww+++wwwwx++www+++wwww+awxx+++xwxw+ww Street Name: "A" STREET NORTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------------------- --------------- --------------- _-----_--------� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- I--------------- II--------------- _--__----____--I Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 0 0 20 0 46 79 98 41 0 56 34 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 24 0 0 20 0 46 79 98 41, 0 56 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 0 0 20 0 46 79 98 41 0 56 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 24 0 0 20 0 46 79 98 41 0 56 34 ------------1------ II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- ---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 373 xxxx xxxxx 350 xxxx 73 90 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 588 xxxx xxxxx 609 xxxx 995 1518 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 539 xxxx xxxxx 585 xxxx 995 1518 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.04 xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx 0.05 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ --------------- 11--------------- --------------- ---__----_--___� Level Of Service Module: Queue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 12.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * A + x + » + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 820 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: " * * * A » ApproachDel: 12.0 9.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A + , Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I 1 AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:04:08 ______________________________ Page 11-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road ___ City of Temecula --------------------------------------------------------- _____-____----______________________________ Level Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) xxx«+x+++++++«+++++++xxx++++x++++++++xx++++«x+++x««+++++x+++x++x+«++x++«+x++++++ 1 Intersection #12 NORTH LOOP ROAD (NIS) / "T" STREET (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.21 1 Street Name: NORTH LOOP ROAD "T" STREET Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 ------------ --------------- Control: Uncontrolled --------------- --------------- Uncontrolled Stop Sign --------------- Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 01 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 ------------ --------------- Volume Module: --------------- ---- -- --------------- Base Vol: 9 33 5 8 38 13 40 0 26 15 0 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Initial BSO: 9 33 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 38 13 40 0 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.00 1.00 15 1.00 0 1.00 23 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 33 5 8 38 13 40 0 26 15 0 23 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Final Vol.: 9 33 5 _.____________________________.-____-__________-II__________-____I 8 38 13 40 0 26 15 0 0 23 Critical Gap Module: 1 'Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx __I____________ 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 7.1 3.5 xxxx xxxx 6.2 3.3 __II_____-______ Capacity Module: ___-_____________II_________-_____I - 1 Cnflict Vol: 51 xxxx xxxxx xxxx Potent Cap.: 1568 xxxxx 38 xxxx xxxxx 126 xxxx 45 1585 xxxx xxxxx 853 xxxx 1031 127 851 xxxx xxxx 36 1043 Move Cap.: 1568 xxxx xxxxx -Volume/Cap: 1585 xxxx xxxxx 827 xxxx 1031 823 xxxx 1043 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0:01 xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx 0.03 0.02 xxxx 0.02 Level OfService Module: Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 9.6 xxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * A * * A + + 1 Movement: LT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1031 xxxx xxxx 1043 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx 0.1 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.6 xxxxx xxxx 8.5 1 Shared LOS: * * * * * + + + A + : A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.2 8.9 ApproachLOS: * * A A 1 1 1 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 I I ' PM PEAK HOUR- ____________________ - Tue Mar 14, ___________________ 2006 10:17:31 Page 13-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road _____ City of Temecula 1 - -----___-------- ` ---- -- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ' Intersection #12 NORTH LOOP ROAD (NIS) / "T" STREET (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.8] ' Street Name: NORTH LOOP ROAD "T" STREET Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ' ___I_______________II_____________________________________________ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ___ _______ Volume Module: __II______________________________I_______________I Base Vol: 29 49 17 26 46 46 26 0 17 10 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 29 49 17 26 46 46 26 0 17. 10 0 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 29 49 17 26 46 46 26 0 17 10 0 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 29 ___I_______________I______________________________�_______________ 49 17 26 46 46 26 0 17 10 0 15 . Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 _________________I______________________ xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: -_______II____ Cnflict Vol: 92 xxxx xxxxx 66 xxxx xxxxx 244 xxxx 69 245 xxxx 58 Potent Cap.: 1515 xxxx xxxxx 1549 xxxx xxxxx 714 xxxx 1000 713 xxxx 1014 Move Cap.: 1515 xxxx xxxxx 1549 xxxx xxxxx 684 xxxx 1000 682 xxxx 1014 Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx 0.02 0.01 xxxx 0.01 _ _______ I--------------- Level Of Service Module: --------------- _______________ ------ Queue____ : 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxx xxxxx 10.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * B + + B + + ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1000 xxxx xxxx 1014 SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx 0.0 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.7 xxxxx xxxx 8.6 ' Shared LOS: * * * + A A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.8 9.3 ApproachLOS: * * A A ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE J I 1 1 I 1 1 AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:04:08 Page 6-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula --------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) x+x++x++xx+x+x+x+++x++xx++++++xx+++++x++++++x+x+xxx++xx++++++++++++xx+xxx++++++x Intersection #6 "H" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 9.0) +++++x++++++x+x+xxx+xx+x+x++++++xx++xx+++xxxxx+++++++++xx+x+++++++x+++++++++x+x+ Street Name: "H" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- -------_------� Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- -_-------------� Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 0 6 9 0 33 11 32 2 2 73 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 0 6 9 0 33 11 32 2 2 73 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 5 0 6 9 0 33 11 32 2 2 73 3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 5 0 6 9 0 33 11 32 2 2 73 3 ---_-------- I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xXxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx --_--_------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- _--- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 150 xxxx 33 137 xxxx 75 76 xxxx xxxxx 34 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 822 xxxx 1046 839 xxxx 993 1536 xxxx xxxxx 1591 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 790 xxxx 1046 829 xxxx 993 1536 xxxx xxxxx 1591 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx 0.01 0.01 xxxx 0.03 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------I 11__ --------------- --------------- Level _ __Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 912 xxxxx xxxx 952 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A * * A ApproachDel: _9.0 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A A Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE ' PM PEAK HOUR- ___---- _---- Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:31 _ _--- _--- _---- _-------- _ Page 8-1 Rori auh p _ Ranch North/South Loop Road ---- _--- ___ City of Temecula -------------------------------------------------------- ____________________________Level Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ' Intersection H6 "H" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.41 ' Street Name: "H" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _______________ Control: Stop Sign _----__---"`-��------------- Stop Sign - Uncontrolled ____ Uncontrolled Rights_____: Include � Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' �--------------- Volume Module: --------------- __--------_____ ---------------� Base Vol: 3 0 4 6 0 22 38 86 6 7 56 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: . 3 0 4 6 0 22 38 86 6. 7 56 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 0 4 6 0 22 38 86 6 7 56 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 3 ______________________I_______________�_______________I 0 4 6 0 22 38 86 6 7 56 10 ----- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: 3.5 __I_____________________________________________I_ xxxx 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: _-____I Cnflict Vol: 251 xxxx 89 242 xxxx 61 66 xxxx xxxxx 92 xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 707 xxxx 975 716 xxxx 1010 1549 xxxx xxxxx 1515 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 676 xxxx 975 697 xxxx 1010 1549 xxxx xxxxx 1515 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx 0.00 0.01 xxxx 0.02 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ' I --------------- Level Of Service Module: II --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 819 xxxxx xxxx 921 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 9.4 xxxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * A * * A ApproachDel: 9.4 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A A ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE ' AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:04:08 Page 5-1 _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ____-------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ' Intersection #5 "G" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A( 9.21 ' Street Name: "G" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ Control: Stop Sign --------------- Stop Sign _____-------- Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' ____________�_____________________' Volume Module: -��____-_________I_______ -______ Base Vol: 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 44 3 0 112 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 7 0 1 0 0 .0 0 44 3 0 112 0 ' User Adj:_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 44 3 0 112 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 7 0 1 ----- _-_____I______________________________II_______________I_____ 0 0 0 0 44 3 0 112 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------ I-------------- _--------------- xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: II--------------- _______________ Cnflict Vol: 158 xxxx 46 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 838 xxxx 1030 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 838 xxxx 1030 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 ---- - ------I--------------- Level Of Service Module: --------------- --------------- --------------- Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * + x Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 858 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: A ApproachDel: .9.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * + 1 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE ' PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:31_- ___________________________________ Page 7-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road ___ City of Temecula ____ ---____` -'____- ------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 'Intersection H5 "G" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.51 ' Street Name: "G" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L T - - R L - T - R ' ------------ I--------------- Control: Stop Sign I--------------- I--------------- Stop Sign Uncontrolled ______________ Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' ___________________________��____-_______'��--------------- Volume Module: - ��--' ---� Base Vol: 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 129 9 1 80 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Initial Bse: , 5 0 1 Uses Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 129 9 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 80 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 129 9 1 80 0 ' Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 5 0 1 ----- ________I_______________I_______________I_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 9 0 0 0 1 80 0 Critical Gap Module: . Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------ I--------------- xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I--------------- 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: II--------------- I_______-____-__ Cnflict Vol: 215 xxxx 134 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 138 xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 777 xxxx 921 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1458 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 777 xxxx 921 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1458 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx I--------------- Level Of Service Module: --------------- --------------- --------------- Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * « « « + + + A + ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 798 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * A ApproachDel: 9.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * + + 1 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I ' AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:04:08 Page 4-1 __________________ ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ----- ___________________________-------_-___-- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) t Intersection #4 "C" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) +x+xx+x+++x++++++xxx++++xx+xx+x+++xxx++++++++xx++++xxx++x+xxx+x+xxxx+++x+xx+ Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.81 ' +++x+xx++++++xx+x+xxxx+++x+++xx+++++xxxx+++++x+x+++++xxx++++xx+++x+x+++x++x+++x+ Street Name: "C" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- Control: Stop Sign I--------------- Stop Sign --------------- Uncontrolled --------------- Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ____________ --------------- Volume Module: ��--------------- ��--------------- ��--------------- I Base Vol: 7 0 0 4 0 22 8 42 2 0 117 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 7 0 0 4 0 22 8 42 2 0 117 1 ' User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 0 0 4 0 22 8 42 2 0 117 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 7 0 0 ----- _______I_______________I_______________I_______________I_______________ 4 0 22 8 42 2 0 117 1 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx __---------------��_______________11 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: ________ _______________� Cnflict Vol: 188 xxxx xxxxx 177 xxxx 118 118 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 777 xxxx xxxxx 790 xxxx 940 1483 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 756 xxxx xxxxx 787 xxxx 940 1483 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx 0.02 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ' ______ __--__��_______________��___--------- I Level Of Service Module: ---------------- -��� Queue__ : 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 9.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * + A + + + + + ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 913 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * * * A x ApproachDel: 9.8 9.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A A * + ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I ' PM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14,2006 10:17:31-- _ Page _ 6-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road _ _ _ City of Temecula ' ___ ________ ____________ _______- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ' Intersection $4 "C" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.5] Street Name: "C" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R '___--------------- �---------------�� Control: Stop Sign ��--------------- Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include I Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ___________--------------- olume Module: Base ��--------------- _-____________I__ --� Vol: 4 0 0 2 0 15 26 135 7 1 81 4 . Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 4 0 0 2 0 15 26 135 7. 1 81 4 ' User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 0 0 2 0 15 26 135 7 1 81 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 4 0 0 _________________________________I_______________II__ 2 0 15 26 135 7 1 81 4 Critical Gap Module: _ . Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ________________________________I_-____________-II_____ 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 283 xxxx xxxxx 276 xxxx 83 85 xxxx xxxxx 142 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 673 xxxx xxxxx 681 xxxx 982 1524 xxxx xxxxx 1453 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 654 xxxx xxxxx 672 xxxx 982 1524 xxxx xxxxx 1453 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.02 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0,00 xxxx xxxx ' I --------------- Level Of Service Module: II---------------II---------------II--------------- Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 10.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * A * * A ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 931 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * * A ApproachDel: 10.5 8.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A + + ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:04:08 Page 3-1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ------ ---------------------------- _-_----------___-_ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $3 "B" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: At 9.11 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- I--------------- I--------------- I_ -_-_-----_-___I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ------------ -- ----------------I_------______-------__ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 19 .7 51 0 0 145 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1 0- 19 7 51 0 0 145 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1 0 19 7 51 0 0 145 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 1 0 19 7 51 0 0 145 0 ----_-_----- I --------------- --------------- --------------- II ---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I--------------- --------------- ---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 210 xxxx 145 145 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 783 xxxx 908 1450 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx Xxxx xxxxx 780 xxxx 908 1450 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.02 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------1--------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------I Level Of Service Module: Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * + * + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.. xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 900 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpI)el:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * A * * * « * « + ApproachDel: xxxxxx 9.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A * + Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE I ' PM PEAK HOUR- -- - _- Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:31 _______ Page 5-1 Roripaugh ______________________________________________ Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula -------------------------------------------------------- ______________________ - -------"-- Level Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ' Intersection #3 "B" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 8.91 ' Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R ____________________II_______________'I_______________I_______________I L T R L T R L T R ' Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Stop Sign Include Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 _____I_______________II_______________II______________________________I 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 12 21 168 0 0 97 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1 0 12 21 168 0 0 97 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' PHF.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1 0 12 21 168 0 0 97 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 0 0 0 -------- _--- _______________I_______________II______________________________ 1 0 12 21 168 0 0 97 1 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ___________________________ 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: _______________ _________________,_-___________� Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 308 xxxx 98 98 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 689 xxxx 964 1508 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 682 xxxx 964 1508 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx ____________ 0.00 xxxx 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx LevelOf Service Module: __ I --------------- __Level Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * ` * * * * A + + + * + Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 934 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * + # + * + ' ApproachDel: xxxxxx 8.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * A * # 1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 1 I ' AM PEAK HOUR Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:04:08 Page 2-1 ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula ' _-------------------------------------------------------- _________ ___________ Level Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ' Intersection N2 "A" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.81 Street Name: "A" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 'I Control: ----- Stop Sign _______________ Stop Sign --------------- Uncontrolled --------------- Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 '1---------------II---------------II--- Volume Module: -----II---- ---I Base Vol: 7 0 0 2 0 51 17 55 2 0 163 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 7 0 0 2 0 51 17 55 2- 0 163 1 ' User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 0 0 2 0 51 17 55 2 0 163 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: ____________L_______________� 7 0 0 2 0 51 17 55 2 0 163 1 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: ------------ 3.5 xxxx xxxxx --------------- 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I--------------- 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: --------------- II_______________I Cnflict Vol: 279 xxxx xxxxx 254 xxxx 164 164 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 677 xxxx xxxxx 704 xxxx 886 1427 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 633 xxxx xxxxx 698 xxxx 886 1427 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.06 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx --------------- Level Of Service Module: --------------- II__ -___________I Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 10.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * A * « + + + ' Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 877 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * A * + ApproachDel: 10.8 9.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A * + ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 I ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 PM PEAK HOUR --Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:17:31 __ _ Page 4-1 ______________________________________________ Roripaugh Ranch - North/South Loop Road City of Temecula --------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 'Intersection #2 'A" STREET (NIS) / SOUTH LOOP ROAD (E/W) Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.2) ' Street Name: "A" STREET SOUTH LOOP ROAD Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign --------------- Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include . Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' _--------------- Volume Module: ��--------------- ��--------------- ��__-_--_-------- Base Vol: 4 0 0 1 0 34 59 187 8 0 107 2 . Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: _ 4 0. 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 0 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 59 187 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 107 2 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 0 0 1 0 34 59 187 8 0 107 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 4 0 0 ----- _______I______________________________I_______________II___ 1 0 34 59 187 6 0 107 2 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 xxxx 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx __I--------------- 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: --------------- ___II_______________ Cnflict Vol: 434 xxxx.xxxxx 417 xxxx 108 109 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Potent Cap.: 536 xxxx xxxxx 550 xxxx 951 1494 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 501 xxxx xxxxx 533 xxxx 951 1494 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx 0.04 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 'I--------------- Level Of Service Module: --------------- --------------- --------------- Queue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 12.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * A + + + « x Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 930 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxx*x xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Shared LOS: * * A + + ApproachDel: 12.2 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B A + x ' Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to VAN DELL & ASSOC, IRVINE 1 I L, k 1 APPENDIX C NORTH/SOUTH LOOP ROAD ENTRY GATE QUEUING ANALYSIS 1 'X\Prolects150_01J91Eng1TechDocs\Repods%Trat�ic Malysis Rewtmppedia Divider dm I 1 F 1 .1 �J 1 GATE QUEUEING ANALYSIS LOCATION: North Loop Road Gated Entry CONDITION: AM Peak Hour DATE: 15 -Mar -06 20 LENGTH OF GATE OPENING INTERVAL (IN SECONDS) 90 PEAK HOUR VOLUME ARRIVING AT GATE 0.50 AVERAGE NUMBER OF ARRIVALS DURING GATE OPENING INTERVAL PROBABILITY OF PROBABILITY OF N ARRIVALS CUMULATIVE N ARRIVALS CUMULATIVE P(0)= 0.6065 0.6065 P(1)= 0.3033 0.9098 P(21)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(2)= 0.0758 0.9856 P(22)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(3)= 0.0126 0.9982 P(23)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(4)= 0.0016 0.9998 P(24)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(5)= 0.0002 1.0000 P(25)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(6)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(26)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(7)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(27)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(8)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(28)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(9)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(29)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(10)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(30)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(11)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(31)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(12)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(32)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(13)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(33)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(14)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(34)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(15)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(35)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(16)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(36)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(17)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(37)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(18)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(38)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(19)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(39)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(20)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(40)= 0.0000 1.0000 X:1Projects1850_01391Eng1TechDocsIReports\TraHic Analysis ReportyGATE-QUEUE.xls]N. Loop -am I 1 h I 1 GATE QUEUEING ANALYSIS LOCATION: North Loop Road Gated Entry CONDITION: PM Peak Hour DATE: 15 -Mar -06 20 LENGTH OF GATE OPENING INTERVAL (IN SECONDS) ::293 PEAK HOUR VOLUME ARRIVING AT GATE 1.63 AVERAGE NUMBER OF ARRIVALS DURING GATE OPENING INTERVAL PROBABILITY OF PROBABILITY OF N ARRIVALS CUMULATIVE N ARRIVALS CUMULATIVE P(0)= 0.1964 0.1964 P(1)= 0.3196 0.5160 ` P(21)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(2)= 0.2602 0.7762 P(22)= 0.0000 .1.0000 P(3)= 0.1412 0.9173 P(23)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(4)= 0.0574 0.9748 P(24)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(5)= 0.0187 0.9935 P(25)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(6)= 0.0051 0.9985 P(26)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(7)= 0.0012 0.9997 P(27)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(8)= 0.0002 0.9999 P(28)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(9)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(29)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(10)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(30)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(11)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(31)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(12)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(32)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(13)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(33)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(14)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(34)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(15)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(35)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(16)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(36)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(17)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(37)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(18)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(38)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(19)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(39)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(20)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(40)= 0.0000 1.0000 %:\Projecar\850 0139\Eng\TechDocs\Repotls\Traffic Analysis Report\[GATE-0UEUE.xlsIS, Loop -pm I ' GATE QUEUEING ANALYSIS ' LOCATION: South Loop Road Gated Entry ' CONDITION: PM Peak Hour DATE: 15 -Mar -06 11 20 LENGTH OF GATE OPENING INTERVAL (IN SECONDS) :254 PEAK HOUR VOLUME ARRIVING AT GATE 1.41 AVERAGE NUMBER OF ARRIVALS DURING GATE OPENING INTERVAL PROBABILITY OF N ARRIVALS CUMULATIVE P(0)= 0.2439 0.2439 P(1)= 0.3441 0.5880 P(2)= 0.2428 0.8308 P(3)= 0.1142 0.9450 P(4)= 0.0403 0.9853 P(5)= 0.0114 0.9967 P(6)= 0.0027 0.9993 P(7)= 0.0005 0.9999 P(8)= 0.0001 1.0000 P(9)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(10)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(11)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(12)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(13)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(14)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(15)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(16)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(17)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(18)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(19)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(20)= 0.0000 1.0000 PROBABILITY OF N ARRIVALS CUMULATIVE P(21)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(22)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(23)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(24)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(25)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(26)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(27)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(28)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(29)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(30)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(31)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(32)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(33)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(34)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(35)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(36)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(37)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(38)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(39)= 0.0000 1.0000 P(40)= 0.0000 1.0000 X:1Projects1850_01391Eng\Tech0ocslReparts\Traffic Analysis RepWe GATE-QUEUEx[s)S. Loop -pm