HomeMy WebLinkAbout103090 CC AgendaCALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
A GENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER
OCTOBER 30, 1990 - 7:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 90-21
Resolution: No. 90-106
Pastor Roger Sowder
Oak Springs Presbyterian
Councilmember Moore
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two
(2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed
on the Agenda, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed
with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the
City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time
limit for individual speakers.
21age~da/103090 1 10/26/90
RIVERSIDE COUNI'Y PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 16, 1989
(AGENDA ITEH 4-1 - Tape 2A)
TRACT HAP NO. 22761, MINOR CHANGE NO. I - EXEHPT FROH CEqA - Glen Fed
Development Co. - Ranthe California Area - First Supervisortel District - 80
lots - 28~ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A - MINOR CHANGE REQUEST:
Reconftquration of Culs-de-sac and Adjacent lots (Cone. from 7/26/89)
Hearing was ~ened at 2:07 p.m. and wms closed at 2:16 p.m.
Staff advised that the letter in question frm the County Geologist has been
facet ved.
TESTZMONY OF PROPONENT:
Robert Kmble (Robert Bean, Willie Frost & Assoc., 38765 Single Oak Drive),
representing the applicant, said that they had hoped to move forward today;
however tf the Canmission wishes a continuance, they would comply. Mr. K~ble
asked that that continuance be one week.
Cmntsstoner Purvtance asked if the staff could peruse the letter from the
Geologist, then could the Commission act on this matter by this afternoon. Mr.
Streeter asked what the letter said. Mr. Goldnan advised that the letter was a
rmcemendatton regarding slope stability on the site. He said that it appeared
to accept the methodology used. Mr, Streetmr saw no problan in moving forward
wtth thts t tee. Mr. Keebl e Idvt sad that he hid no probl am with the Gaol ogi s t' s
1 meter.
Mr. Goldnan suggested that the Cmmtsston get copies of the letter.
Cmntsstoner Turner slid thlt the letter Is pretty clear cut. The report
satisfies the General Plan requireant for I slope stability report, and the
letter ts all positive. Mr. Goldnan said that the rmcmendmtton of the
Geologist has been incorporated within the trice map. Camtssioner Turner
asked if there were any other concerns, and Mr. Goldnan advised that that was
the mm;lor issue. Mr. Gol dnln slid thlt staff would racemend approval of the
Mt nor Change.
Mr. Keeble referred to PNe 4 of the conditions of approvll, item d, which
relates to the CCIR's. He said that that ts an older condition that usmes
that they ~mml d Myra all Um mort irems Ftng to Um Caunty t n confonman~e
vlth CSA 143. It was not the talent of the applicant for all the common open
space Irma to go to the County, leowaver, they have not decided which ereas
will or will not go to the County, He said that there is another standard
condition for that situation, and they muld prefer that condition instead.
Mr. Streetmr said tint. staff anted to make fare that the open space erems are
maintained. He would Frefer that the maintenance M under llethtng oUmr than
lameowners, but that hcmeowners would suffice. That stenderd language works
fine. Mr. Goldman sltd that that condition nould ve the developer the option
to go etther wly. Mr. Sireater said thee that could be done, Mr. 6oldnan said
that the CC&R's go through the Pllnntng Department, then County Counsel, so
staff could subs. tttute the alterflute conoltton.
13 .'
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all
will be enacted by One roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and
resolutions included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of October 2, 1990, as mailed.
2.2 Approve the minutes of October 9, 1990, as mailed.
3
4
Cancellation of Meeting of November 6. 1990
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve cancellation of the City Council Meeting scheduled for
November 6, 1990.
Resolution Apl)roving Payment of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS .AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
21agenda/103090 2 I012e/80
5
Tentative Tract MaD No. 22761. Minor Change No. 1. First Fxtension of Time
Coleman Homes
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road, west of Ynez Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file.
6
7
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762. First Extension of Time - Coleman Homes
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road, west of Ynez Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Receive and file.
Second Reading of Ordinance For
Enrollment
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Public Employees Retirement System
Read by title only and approve an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPL 0 YEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
8
Second Reading of Overweight Vehicle Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
ORDINANCE NO. 90-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDING CHAPTER 12.06 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
ESTABLISHING VEHICLE WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS ON THE PUBLIC
STREETS
2legendall 03080 3 10/26/90
9
Authorization of Release of Monument Bond for Tract No. 18518-2
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize the release of the Monument Bond for Tract No. 18518-
2 and direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
10
Authorization to Release Monument Bond for Tract No. 22593-2
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Authorize the release of the Monument Bond for Tract 22593-2
and direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
CSD MEETING - (To be held at 8:00 PM) Please see separate agenda
PUBLIC HEARINGS
11
Appeal No. 9. Plot Plan No. 11609 - Bed and Lounge Furniture Showroom and
Retail Center
North side of Winchester Road,
Jefferson Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
700 feet southwest of the centerline of
Uphold the Planning Commission's Denial of Plot Plan No. 11609.
2legendall 03090 4 10126/90
12
Change of 7one 5714. Conditional Use Permit 3046 - Arco Mini-Mart
Northwest corner of Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve Change of Zone 5417.
12.2 Receive and file Conditional Use Permit.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
13
Contract Services for Ynez Corridor Project
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve the City Manager's recommendation for contract services
with C. M. "Max" Gilliss.
14
Proposals for Curb-side Recycling Program
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Instruct the City Manager to solicit proposals
recycling program to be instituted city-wide.
for curb-side
15
Personnel Reclassification
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Adopt a resolution to reclassify Recreation Supervisor position to
Recreation Superintendent and establish authorized positions,
titles, and salary ranges for all City employees entitled.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL POLICIES
21egendl/1030~0 6 1012e/90
16
Status Report on AD-159 and AD-161
Presentation by C.M. "Max" Gilliss
17
Improvement Funding Reimbursement Agreement for Highway Construction
Costs - AD-161
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement, between the City
of Temecula and the County Assessment District No. 161, to lend
the sum of $750,000 with repayment to be made from funds to
be generated through sale of AD-161 Group C bonds.
17.2
Exchange presently proposed interim improvement project for the
Winchester/Nicolas Road intersection in consideration of inclusion
of the permanent improvement of Winchester/Nicolas Road in a
contract already awarded and underway.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: November 13, 1990,
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
7:00
Temecula
Community
2/liende/1030~0 8 10/28t80
ITEM NO.
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HE~,D OCTOBER 2, 1990
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at
7:02 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol, Temecula, California.
Mayor Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and
Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor George Simmons, Temecula Valley House of
Praise.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Mayor Parks.
PRESENTATIONS/
PRO CI, A MA TIONS
Jim Wright, Division Chief of the Riverside County Fire Department, introduced the
newest Batallion Chief for the City of Temecula, Mark Brodowski. Mr. Wright stated
this will give Temecula 24 hour supervisory coverage.
City Manager Dixon introduced the new Parks and Recreation Director, Shawn Nelson.
Mr. Nelson stated he will strive to bring quality and commitment into every aspect of
Community Services.
Mayor Parks proclaimed October 5, 6, and 7, 1990 as "Great Temecula Tractor Race
Days ".
14 i nut es \ 10\02\90 - 1 - 10/22/90
City Council Minutes October 2, 1990
Swearing in ceremonies were conducted by Mayor Parks, reading the charges for the
three Commissions; Parks and Recreation Commission, Public Safety Commission and
Traffic Commission. Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek swore in the following
Commissioners:
Parks and Recreation Commission
Claudia Brode
Evelyn Harker
William Hillin
Michael Kirby
Jeffrey Nimeshein
Public Safety Commission
Ted Goudy
Frank Klein
Ronald Knopp
Kevin Ruddy
Joseph Schneider
Traffic Commission
Jerry Godnick
Ron Guerriero
Knox Johnson
Ronald Roberts
Mayor Parks announced Steve Sander of the Traffic Commission could not be in
attendance and will be sworn in at a later date.
RECESS
A recess was called at 7:25 PM to hold a reception for the newly appointed
Commissioners. The meeting was reconvened at 7:55 PM.
PUBLIC FORUM
City Manager Dixon introduced a new structure for the first meeting of the month,
called Public Forum. He explained 45 minutes have been set aside to allow for
interaction between the public and Councilmembers. He explained that no action
could be taken but that questions could be answered. He stated this has not be done
in many communities and will be conducted on a trial basis in the City of Temecula.
14 i nut es\ 10\02\90 - 2 - 1 O/22/90
City Council Minutes October 2. 1990
Thomas Langley, 35020 Calle Campo, President of the Community Recreation Center
Building Foundation, requested the support of the City Council for the request for City
participation in the CRC. He asked it be placed on the agenda in the near future.
Mayor Parks suggested this matter be discussed by the Parks and Recreation
Commission, and the Parks and Recreation Director make recommendations on the
location of the facility and programs to be offered.
Lillian Crider, 41518 Big Sage Court, stated she had a petition containing 47 names
of homeowners in the Ridgeview Development, opposing the City leasing the land
behind her residential development for the purpose of a Christmas Tree Farm. She
stated many home owners had no wish to go into business with their neighbors and
were worried about added liability and insurance costs to the homeowners
association.
Bill Bopf, 28924 Front Street, Suite 106, asked that the City move quickly to allocate
funds for the Community Recreation Center, with a possible goal of having this facility
in place in the next year and a half.
Mr. Bopf also spoke in support of the Temecula Valley Economic Development
Corporation and their request for matching funds of $75,000 from the City of
Temecula. He stated this Corporation will benefit the City financially much more than
the $75,000 cost of matching funds. Mr. Bopf stated there are 15,000 Economic
Development Corporations in the United States, and most are funded 50 + % by the
public agencies. He reported the major emphasis will be placed on commercial and
industrial development. He asked the allocation be made in the middle of October, so
work in this area can move forward.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
approve Consent Calendar Items No. 1-4 as follows:
1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2. Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 18, 1990, as mailed.
2.2 Approve the minutes of September 24, 1990, as mailed.
nut es\ 10 \02\90 - E3 - 10/22/90
City Council Minutes October 2, 1990
Application for ABC License - Dennv's Restaurant
3.1 Receive and file.
Amendment to 3- Year Cool3erative Agreements with County of Riverside CDBG
Program
4.1 Approve the Amendment.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Pilot Transit Program Within the City of Temecula
City Manager Dixon reported the City has been asked to support efforts to
provide local public transportation to this valley. He stated that public
transportation may not be forthcoming in this area unless the City supports this
effort. He stated the City has been asked to give moral support to efforts by
the applicant, so funding can be sought from the Urban Mass Transit Authority.
City Manager Dixon recommended not only lending the City's support, but
soliciting support from others. With this support this proposition can go forth
and if approved by the Federal Government, transportation can be provided to
this community, integrating with transit systems from the north and possibly
from northern San Diego County.
Councilmember Moore asked if a marketing study was available for review.
City Manager Dixon stated the applicant is present.
Delores McDaniels, 4456 Masters Drive, reported Thomas Mindiola has been
working on this project for approximately two years and has quite a few
statistics which can be made available. She stated the purpose of this item is
to request support for Mr. Mindiola's participation in the Department of
Transportation's entrepreneur program, designed to satisfy unmet transit needs.
N i nutes \ 10\02\90 - 4- 10/22/90
City Council Minutes
October 2o 1990
She stated he is proposing to provide local transportation in Temecula Valley
for shopping and employment. She said the needs of the elderly will also be
targeted. She stated that 80% of citizens participating in a recent newspaper
poll felt that local transportation is needed in Temecula.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked that Councilmember Moore's question regarding
surveys be addressed.
Doug Savy answered that some initial studies have been completed by the
applicant, along with research obtained from individuals in the business
community and newspaper articles. He stated all of the information gathered
thus far indicates a substantial need for these services.
City Manager Dixon stated that the requirements to obtain Federal Grants are
very strict and studies will be required. He said UMTA will ask how this
program will pay for itself. A marketing analysis will be required.
Mayor Parks asked if there is a proposed base fare? Ms. McDaniels answered
the initial fare is proposed at 75 cents a ride.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated if this program is to be successful, it will require
innovative programs. He said Mr. Mindiola has approached many businesses
in the community, the wineries for example, who have expressed interest not
only to bring tourists to the area, but also employees.
Councilmember Mu~oz moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to
authorize the City Manager to prepare a letter of support to be signed by the
Mayor and the members of the City Council and to enter into an agreement,
subject to approval of the City Attorney, to serve as sponsor for the applicant
Thomas Mindiola.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
14 i nut es\ 10\02\90 - 5 - 10/22/90
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1990
Consideration of 1990-91 Budget Requests for Funding
City Manager Dixon reported that the City has received many requests for
funding that the Council put a hold on for 90 days. He suggested one of two
procedures for making a determination regarding which organizations to fund.
The first would be to direct the City Manager to review all existing requests for
funding and make recommendations and the second would be to appoint an Ad
Hoc Committee consisting of two members of the City Council to work with
the City Manager. He stated he would prefer working with a committee.
Mayor Parks stated that staff had been asked to set guidelines for selecting
programs to be funded. He asked the status of these guidelines.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated several specific guidelines discussed are as
follows:
1. The ability of the organization to raise it funds from other sources.
2. The financial strength of the organization.
3. The benefit to the community supporting the organization would bring.
Mary Jane Henry, Chief Financial Officer, stated she has obtained guidelines
from another City and has set these aside for the individuals who will review
the specific applications pending a decision on this agenda item.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz
to appoint an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Councilmember Lindemans,
Councilmember Birdsall and City Manager Dixon to review all existing requests
for funding and establish criteria for evaluating requests.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
N i nutes%10%02%90 - 6- 10/22/90
City Council Minutes October 2o 1990
Reouest for Funding Mrs. Temecula (Mrs. California/America Pageant)
City Manager Dixon introduced Kim Erickson, Mrs. Temecula, to speak on
behalf of this request.
Kim Erickson, 41661 Enterprise Circle, stated she has been chosen to represent
the City of Temecula in the Mrs. California Pageant. She stated she will be
representing Temecula, and requested the City's support in the amount of
$500. She said it will be an excellent opportunity to make the new City of
Temecula known.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if this is an appropriate event for funding by the
City or whether this should be funded by service clubs.
Mayor Parks stated that this individual is representing the City. He said that
the City is not being asked to sponsor the entire campaign, but is only one of
the many sponsors. He said this is an excellent opportunity for advertising the
City throughout the State and feels this is an appropriate event to sponsor.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in support of sponsoring Kim Erickson in
the Mrs. California Pageant. She said Temecula is still a very young City and
needs this kind of exposure. She suggested setting guidelines for future
requests so a policy can be established.
Councilmember Moore stated that since the City would not be the only
sponsor, she would be in favor of appropriating $500 for this event. She also
requested guidelines be set.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated if guidelines for sponsorship of events are
established, he would also be in support of this event.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion
to allocate $500 to sponsor Kim Erickson as Mrs. Temecula with the
understanding the Council will set a policy regarding requests for sponsorship.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
H i nut es\ 10\02\90 - 7- 10/22/90
City Council Minutes
October 2, 1990
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dixon reported he will be placing on the October 9, 1990 Agenda, a
committee comprised of two Planning Commissioners, two Councilmembers, City
Manager Dixon and Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, to evaluate firms and choose one
to prepare the General Plan for the City of Temecula.
He also reported he will place on the October 9, 1990 Agenda, a proposal for
scheduling a Team Building Session for the City Council and the City Manager with
the suggested dates of November 9th and 10th.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Attorney Field requested the meeting be adjourned to a closed Executive Session
on October 9, 1990, at 6:30 PM, to discuss the Outdoor Media and Jones Intercable
Litigation.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Birdsall reported she artended the Community Services Committee
Meeting for the League of California Cities, where definite legislative recommendations
were made for the general conference. She also informed Council she has been
appointed to the Community Services Committee for the conference next year to be
held in Monterey.
Councilmember Moore requested that Caltrans be reminded to change the freeway
signs entering the City to read City of Temecula instead of Rancho California.
Councilmember Mu~oz reported he artended a Rural Tourism Council Convention. He
stated he learned many ways to attract tourists to an area such as Temecula. He said
a report is forthcoming.
Mayor Parks requested that uses suggested during a recent WRCOG Meeting for
Measure "A" Funds be placed on the October 16, 1990 Agenda for discussion.
Mayor Parks informed Council of a meeting of the Western Regional Coalition of
Governments on October 13, 1990 to discuss how government and schools can work
together to provide quality education.
M i nutes \ 10\02\90 - 8- 10/22/90
City Council Minutes October 2o 1990
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
adjourn at 9:20 PM to the meeting of October 9th, at 6:30 PM to hold an Executive
Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to consider real property
acquisition, and Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss matters relating to
litigation. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
nut es\ 10\02\90 - 9 - 10/22/90
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD OCTOBER 9, 1990
A Regular Meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:35 PM at the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron
Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and
Recording Secretary Susan W. Jones.
Executive Session
City Attorney Scott Field announced that the purpose of this closed session was to
discuss pending litigation in the matter of Jones Intercable vs. the City of Temecula,'
and Outdoor Media Group vs. the City of Temecula. This was done pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a).
The meeting was adjourned to executive session at 6:37 PM. The executive session
was adjourned at 7:12 PM.
The regular meeting was called to order at 7:16 PM with all members present.
INVOC,4 TION
The invocation was given by Pastor Gary Nelson, Calvary Chapel.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Birdsall.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
City Manager Dixon introduced Anthony Elmo, the Chief Building Official for the City
of Temecula.
M inutes\ 10\09\~0 - 1 -
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
Certificates of Appreciation were presented to Mary Jo Helmeke and Eve Craig for
their participation in the Temecula Arts Festival '90.
Mayor Parks proclaimed October 9, 1990 as Joan F. Sparkman Day in Temecula for
her outstanding service in the Community.
Carol Henderson Wright presented the City Council with a newly published book
entitled "Temecula Remembered".
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Edward Doran, 39985 Stamos Court, expressed his thanks and congratulations to the
members of the City Council for resolving several problems facing the community.
Those problems include, traffic on the overpass, which has been successfully
mitigated with use of traffic directors. He voiced his approval of the appointment of-
Shawn Nelson as the City's Parks and Recreation Director, stating he is an
outstanding choice for the position. Mr. Doran also expressed his thanks to the
Council for setting aside one meeting a month to interact with the citizens and allow
questions to be answered and opinions to be voiced.
Glen D. Richardson, 27588 Jon Christian Place, stated he would like to thank CSA-
143 for the improvement in youth programs in recent months. He stated there were
eight concerns addressed at a meeting in February. Two the Council acted upon very
quickly; one the safety phone at Sports Parks; and the other the hiring of Shawn
Nelson. He asked that the concerns, still unaddressed, be placed on the agenda so
formal action can be taken. He stated his specific concerns are as follows: the
possibility of lighting some of the Sports Park facilities quickly; the fee structure; and
enforcement of the fee policy. He asked that this planning be done before Spring
when the push for these programs occur.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Lindemans requested the removal of Agenda Items Nos. 6 and 7 from
the Consent Calendar. He asked that a no vote on Item No. 13 be entered on the
record.
Councilmember Mu~oz requested the removal of Items No. 4 and 8 from the Consent
Calendar.
14 i nut es\ 10 \09\90 - 2 -
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
Mayor Parks announced he had a request to speak on Item No. 11 and asked it be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve Consent Calendar Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12 and 13 with a "no" vote by
Councilmember Lindemans noted. He explained that this parcel should have been
mixed use and a public hearing should have been held, and for this reason he would
vote no.
The items are as follows:
1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2. Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 25, 1990, as mailed.
3. Resolution Approving Payment of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
Acceptance of Public Improvements in Tract 20319
5.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20319.
5.2 Authorize the reduction of street, sewer, and water bonds and release
Monument Bond.
5.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Plot Plan 11620
9.1 Receive and file.
N i nut es\ 10\09\90
-3-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9o 1990
10.
12.
13.
Substantial Conformance No. 9
10. 1 Receive and file.
Cancellation of Regular Meetin{1 of October 23, 1990
12.1 Approve cancellation of the City Council Meeting scheduled for October
23, 1990.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Find Parcel Map No. 21383
13.1
Approve Final Parcel Map No. 21383, the Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions, and the Special Facilities Agreement, subject to the
conditions of approval, and the conditions as put forth in Development
Agreement No. 1.
Mary Jane Henry, Chief Financial Officer, reported the action requested is the
first step required to join the public employee's retirement program administered
by the State. She explained the contribution amount was derived from a study
done by PERS.
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Public Employee's Retirement System Enrollment
Councilmember Mu~oz requested a brief staff report, asking why the numbers
are high.
Hinutes\10\09\90
-4-
10/26/90
The motion was carried by the following vote:
City Council Minutes October 9. 1990
City Manager Dixon stated this rate is in keeping with all the smaller and
medium sized cities.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if this is strictly for retirement. City Manager
Dixon stated yes. He said actuarial studies will be done as time goes on. He
explained that these benefits only apply at the time of retirement.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the actual dollar figure is based on actual
salaries paid out. Ms. Henry answered it is based on money paid out.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if this program could begin one year from now
instead of immediately, saving the City this money for the first year. City
Manager Dixon stated that PERS would probably require at the time the City
began offering this service, to retroactively reimburse employees to original hire
date. Therefore, this would not offer the City any savings.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if this replaces Social Security. City Manager-
Dixon answered the only portion it does not include is Medicare.
Councilmember Mu~oz moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion
to adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-103
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Certification of Governing Body's
Action.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
M inutes\ 10\09\90
-5-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9. 1990
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember
Lindemans to read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPL 0 YEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Plot Plan No. 11669, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633
Councilmember Lindemans requested that a check list be developed to inform
Council that all requirements have been met. He requested that Tenant
Improvement Ordinance be adopted to handle parking concerns.
Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner stated the current ordinance is constructed in this
manner. He explained the County Ordinance was adopted and this is currently
being done.
City Manager Dixon stated a check list will be available in the near future.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion
to uphold Planning Commission's Approval of Plot Plan No. 11669 and
Tentative Parcel map No. 25633.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
M i nutes%10%09%90 - 6- 10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
Tentative Tract Mao No. 19872, Amended No. 2, Phase 3 and 4, a Revised
Permit
Gary Thornhill explained that Council is not reviewing the Tentative Parcel Map.
He stated this is only revised architectural elevations, floor plans and the
plotting of the units on the property. He said this action is only approval of a
revised permit.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember
Lindemans to receive and file Tentative Tract Map No. 19872, Amended NO.
2, Phase 3 and 4, a Revised Permit.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Conditional Use Permit No. 2
Councilmember Mu~oz stated concerns with the parking at this location.
Gary Thornhill stated the concern with parking had to do with the bays. He
stated the County of Riverside requires four parking spaces for each bay. He
said the square footage has been substantially reduced and using the general
standards for commercial zoning, parking is not a problem. He stated the
Planning Commission and the Planning Department felt that the bay parking
issue is on the heavy side, since cars are parked in the bay areas.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he felt the parking ratios set by the County
should not have been reduced, as it is already a minimum standard.
M i nut es \ 10\09\90 - 7-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion
to receive and file Conditional Use Permit No. 2.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
11. Approval of Allocation of Funds for City of Temecula Employees Holiday Dinner
City Manager Dixon stated the numbers in the staff report inadvertently
included contract employees who will be paying their own cost. The adjusted
total would cover 30 employees which includes the five members of Council-
at a cost of $1,405.
Councilmember Lindemans requested that the Traffic Controllers be included
in this dinner. City Manager Dixon stated that if they are included the cost
should return to the original figure of $2,350.
Sydney Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, stated his disapproval of allocating any
public funds for the purpose of a Holiday Dinner for City Employees. He stated
that employees should pay for their own holiday celebrations, including the City
Council. He stated he felt this is a misuse of public funds.
Stan Palmquist, 42951 Virgo Court, stated that he is against the City allocating
money for a Holiday Dinner. He asked that public funds not be used to fund
such an event.
City Manager Dixon replied that if there is public concern or misgivings, the
employees will fund this program themselves.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he feels a Christmas Party is important and
in all the years he has been in business a Christmas Party has always been
given to employees. He stated he is in support of a funded event.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he was inclined to vote for this because he feels
in the first year of Cityhood, employees sacrifice and work very hard to get the
City going. He said, that he has since come to realize, there is a difference
between the private sector and the public sector and public funds should not
14 i nut es\ 10\09\90 - 8 - 10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
be used for such an event. However, he asked if there are other ways to fund
this event, such as contributions.
Councilmember Moore stated she felt a sense of camaraderie should be
encouraged among City employees. She reminded Councilmember Lindemans
that as good a job as the Traffic Controllers are doing, they are contract
employees and are not City Employees.
City Manager Dixon requested that the Council not take action on this matter.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
Mu~oz to remove Item No. 11 from the agenda.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RECESS
Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:13 PM to be reconvened to a CSD meeting.
Following the CSD meeting the City Council Meeting was reconvened at 8:40 PM.
PUBLIC HEARING
14. Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Conditional Use Permit No. I
Gary Thornhill reported this is an appeal of the Planning Commission Denial by
James Ramsey for an automobile sales lot and a 528 square foot office
building. He stated the Commission had a number of concerns. Basically their
concerns were that this is not an appropriate structure for the area; there are
no facilities to service automobiles related to the sale of those vehicles. There
are also concerns with the landscaping and concerns that this is not the type
of use that should be in a scenic highway zone. For these reasons, the
Commission denied the application for a conditional use permit. The planning
staff recommended upholding the decision of the Planning Commission for
denial.
M i nut es\ 10\09\~0
-9-
10126190
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
Councilmember Lindemans stated that $15,000,000 is being spent via a Mello
Roos District on Ynez Road to make it attractive for car dealers. He stated we
need this kind of business in the City. He said he received a letter from the
applicant addressing certain issues of concern, and stated these points should
be addressed.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 8:45 PM.
Kevin McKinsey, 40550 La Colima Road, representing the applicant, stated the
denial was based on The Commission's preference to have a more permanent
facility due to the property's proximity to the scenic highway. He said the
business would like to open this new facility in Temecula with the hope that it
will grow. He stated the limited time frame of the CUP is 10 years with a 2
year review by the Planning Commission. He stated the proposed building
would not have a modular appearance, but would be on a permanent
foundation, be stuccoed and have a tile roof. He emphasized that this will not
be a used car lot, but primarily for sale of new cars.
Mr. McKinsey asked that the City Council disregard the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and grant CUP No. 1.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked why a permanent facility could not be
constructed. Mr. McKinsey answered it is a question of time and available
space. He said the Hyundai people would like to establish a dealership now
with the hope of it becoming a permanent facility in the future. He stated this
CUP has a ten year life with a two year review, which would give the Planning
Commission the opportunity to check on the progress and development in the
area.
City Manager Dixon stated one of the conditions the Council may wish to place
on this permit if it desires to override the Planning Commission is to consider
this is a new car sales lot primarily so that it does not change and become a
used car lot. He said a new location for Hyundai is extremely important to
them and suggested it should be in the City of Temecula. He stated ten years
for a conditional use permit is too long, and recommended four or five years is
more appropriate. He suggested making the review period an annual one.
Mr. McKinsey stated that the life of the CUP could be changed to seven years.
He said the problem with a shorter life of permit, is the existing adjacent parcel
which will not come available for six years.
M i nut es\ 10\09\90
-10-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9. 1990
Mayor Parks asked since the Planning Commission felt the building was not of
the desired quality, would the applicant be willing to have the Planning
Commission reevaluate the structure and landscaping?
Mr. McKinsey said he would be willing, however this should also go through
staff. He explained that stuccoing the building, tile roof and a permanent
foundation all came from staff recommendations.
John Unruh, 28715 Maple Road, Moreno Valley, General Manager of Quaid
Hyundai, reported Hyundai has only been in the United States since 1986. He
stated Hyundai is looking for the smaller markets and is interested in opening
a point in Temecula. He reported he looked into the Auto Park and it is not
financially feasible at this time. He said their number one concern is that any
business venture undertaken be successful. He stated the concern that no
service would be available on site is covered because a service facility will be
located about a mile and that will be a permanent service facility.
Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 9:20 PM.
City Manager Dixon said that a new point for Hyundai is very important and it
is indicated that it should be developed in Temecula. He also stressed
establishing sales are for primarily for new cars is important. He said seven
years is not an unreasonable request with a review once a year. He advised a
temporary structure can be done in a very aesthetically pleasing manner. He
said adding those conditions would put a better light on the application that has
been received.
City Attorney Field suggested continuing this item for two weeks to further
address the conditions being placed on this CUP.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if this should be sent back to the Planning
Commission instead of simply overruling their recommendation.
Councilmember Lindemans asked that this not be sent back to the Planning
Commission. He stated this would be a hardship on the applicant, and stated
that if the Planning Commission had all the facts, their decision would be
different.
Mayor Parks called a one minute break at 9:25 PM to change the tape. The
meeting was reconvened at 9:26 PM.
N i nut es \ 10\09\90
-11-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, recommended taking action on the issue and the
necessary adjustments relating to design could be worked out by staff so this
project can be moved along.
Councilmember Birdsall suggested leaving the Conditional Use Permit at 10
years instead of seven years, stating this may not give the applicant enough
time.
City Manager Dixon stated he would prefer seven years, with the opportunity
for the applicant to extend the permit.
Mayor Parks stated he agreed that this matter should be settled tonight. He
summarized the recommendations are to change Planning Condition No. 8 to
read seven years instead of ten years; Condition 12 - the primary use of the
property shall be restricted to the sale of new automobiles and No. 12 should
be amended to read that this should be a new franchise point. He expressed
his only concern is that the Planning Commission review the approval of the-
building and landscaping.
City Manager Dixon suggested referring the building design and architecture
and landscaping to the Planning Commission for their final action.
Councilmember Mu~oz moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion
to sustain the applicants appeal and grant CUP No. 1, with revised conditions
of approval and additional instructions that revised architectural and landscape
plans to go before the Planning Commission at the next available date after
submittal to the Planning Department. Further to adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. I TO PERMIT OPERA TION
OF AN AUTOMOBILE SALES LOT AND A 528 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN
WINCHESTER ROAD AND OVERLAND DRIVE.
M i nutes\l 0\09\90
-12-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9. 1990
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15. Sam Hicks Park Dedication of Land
City Manager Dixon reported this staff report has been prepared by the City
Attorney and staff recommendation is that the City Council accept the offer of
dedication of Sam Hicks Monument Park subject to the revision contained im
the Grant Deed and the Declaration of Restrictions; subject to the Old Town
Temecula Foundation approving the revised land lease for the museum.
City Attorney Field stated the parties involved are officially the Sam Hicks
Monument Park Foundation and the Old Town Temecula Museum Foundation.
He also stated the lease will be reviewed by the Museum Foundation on
October 16, 1990.
Councilmember Birdsall stated the parties are the Sam Hicks Monument Park
and it's the Temecula Museum Foundation, not the Old Town Museum.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he could not approve acceptance of land that
can not be used for any other purpose.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the agreement provides for any requirements
of obligations on the part of the City if the Museum Foundation does not
successfully raise the money to build and operate the museum. City Attorney
Field stated a requirement has been added to the lease that states within three
years construction must begin and within five years, the museum is to be
completed.
He stated he does have a minor concern that the monument remain in the same
place. City Attorney Field responded that he has had discussion on the use
restrictions and it is important to the Foundation that the power of termination
remain. He stated there is already a similar restriction on the property imposed
M i nutes\l 0\09\90 - 1 ] - 10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
by Kaiser Aetna, restricting the use of the property. He stated regardless of
what action the Council takes, the power of termination will remain.
Councilmember Moore stated that if the City does not accept this park, it will
remain as it is, the museum will be built by the foundation and the land will
probably be offered to the Museum Foundation.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he felt the insurance was inadequate and
suggested it be revised up to $1,000,000. City Attorney Field responded that
these were limits originally proposed. He stated the limits need to reflect what
is available to a non-profit organization.
Councilmember Birdsall said the Museum will be fenced and not open to the
public in the first year and this insurance amount should be adequate. She
stated this can be increased when the Museum opens.
Mayor Parks stated this property will remain a park in the City of Temecula-
whether the City accepts it or not, He said the City would be much better off
to have control of the maintenance and use, to make it into a well-maintained
nice area, instead of an "eye sore". He stated that if a situation arises in the
future where the City needs the property for another purpose, the City could
at that time negotiate further,
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Parks to accept
the offer of dedication of Sam Hicks Park subject to the reverter clause
contained in the Grant Deed and the Declaration of Restrictions, and subject to
the Temecula Museum Foundation approving the revised land lease for the
Museum.
The motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Councilmember Mu~oz clarified his yes vote is with the understanding that the
insurance be adjusted when the museum is open to the public.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to extend
the meeting to 10:30 PM.
Hinutes\10\09\90 -14-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
Mayor Parks called a recess at 10:10 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:16 PM.
16. Adult Business Permit Ordinance
City Attorney Field reported that there is no existing Riverside County
Ordinance regulating Adult Businesses and upon discovering this deficiency in
the current code, an interim ordinance has been prepared. This will require
4/5ths vote to approve. He stated this will be a 45 day ordinance, and staff
will come back shortly with an extension and eventually come back with a
more sophisticated ordinance. He stated it is important to have something on
the books to regulate these types of uses, which can have negative impacts on
the community.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to adopt interim urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-18
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RELATING TO ADULT BUSINESSES AND
REQUIRING A PERMIT THEREFOR
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
17. Committee to Select General Plan Consultants
City Manager Dixon reported staff has asked the Planning Commission to
appoint two of its members to a screening panel for the selection of General
Plan Consultants. Mr. Dixon suggested appointing two members of the City
Council along with the City Manager to function as an interview board to
choose a consulting firm so work on the general plan can commence.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion
to nominate Councilmember Moore and Councilmember Mu~oz to serve on an
Ad Hoc Committee, stating that these two Councilmembers will provide for
opposing viewpoints.
M inutes\ 10\09\90 - 15 - 10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9o 1990
18.
Mayor Parks stated he did not have a problem with this, however since he does
have some expertise in planning and engineering issues he offered his services
to serve on the committee.
Councilmember Moore declined the nomination to give Mayor Parks the
opportunity to serve on the committee.
Councilmember Lindemans amended the motion, Councilmember Birdsall
amended the second to appoint Mayor Parks and Councilmember Mu~oz to
serve with the City Manager, Steven Ford and John Hoagland of the Planning
Commission to choose a consultant for the General Plan.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Consideration of Scheduling City Council/City Manager Team Building Session
City Manager Dixon reported that as discussed in a memorandum to the
Council, he discussed with Ted Gaebler the possibilities of conducting a Team
Building Session. He also reported that the League of California Cities will be
holding a team building session in January and also in May. He stated the
process used by Mr. Gaebler would provide a select, more personalized program
than the League of California Cities which works with eight or ten cities and is
not tailored to any one particular group. He also reported the cost of these
two different types of sessions are substantially different.
Councilmember Moore asked if the League's Team Building Session also
allowed for goal setting? Mr. Dixon answered it is team building that brings the
Council together to know themselves, as well as developing interpersonal skills.
Councilmember Lindemans asked how much preliminary work would be
involved in the program to be conducted by Ted Gaebler. City Manager Dixon
answered that Mr. Gaebler would spend two or three days prior to the session
and to meet individually with each Councilmember, so that the program can be
designed to meet the goals of this Council.
M i nutes\ 10\09\90
-16-
10/26/90
CitV Council Minutes October 9o 1990
Councilmember Lindemans stated this seems like a very large expense and
asked if there are others who can do this type of work at a lower cost. City
Manager Dixon stated this type of program is costly and if this is a concern,
perhaps the Council should attend the League's program which is one-third of
the cost, and if desired at a later point a more individual program could be
implemented.
Sydney Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, stated he did not feel it was appropriate
to spend $12,000 to $15,000 so that the City Council can work better
together. He said he understands the concern to have an effective Council, yet
he feels the Council does not have to always agree, and feels the funds could
be more appropriately spent.
Jane Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, stated she is also opposed to allocating
funds for a team building session. She said she does not feel the Council
should necessarily be the best of friends, thereby making it more difficult to
make decisions according to one's conscience. Ms. Vernon said if the Council-
would listen more to the people of the community, the Council would become
more effective and grow closer together.
Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 10:40 PM. The meeting
was reconvened at 10:41 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
extend the meeting until 11:00 PM.
Nancy Barber, 29838 Corte Castille, stated she felt the cost of $15,000 would
be more on the lines of personal counseling for the Councilmembers, and said
there are ways of getting along better without spending this amount. She
suggested that the League of California Cities Team Building session would be
preferable.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated it seems like a great deal of money, and
questioned the benefits that would be derived from such a session. He said
team building seems to be many things; mutual respect, respecting the
viewpoint of others, being fair to all members; philosophies must be
compromised at times; and the majority making the minority feel as if they too
make a contribution. He stated that if these types of issues can be resolved by
team building, he would support the idea. However, he stated that knowing
human nature, Council is dealing with philosophies and human nature and
unless this individual is a psychiatrist who works with behavior modification,
this session would not be effective.
14 i nut es\ 10\09\90 - 17- 10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9o 1990
Mayor Parks suggested that one other item needed is mutual trust among
members, and suggest that the League of California Cities Conference in
January, would be an appropriate forum to accomplish these common goals.
He stated in the meantime, if the Council would desire a goal setting session,
he would be in favor of hiring a facilitator for a day to accomplish this.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he feels The Council does need to set up a
one-day session as soon as possible and would support this idea.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she may not be able to attend the meeting in
January as it conflicts with year end tax reports for her business.
City Manager Dixon reported this team building is most effective when all
members are present, but stated he still feels it is important to schedule.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to direct staff to schedule the Council for the League of California Cities Team-
Building Session in January and schedule a one-day workshop with a facilitator
to be held in November.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
19.
Urgency Ordinance Establishing Decision Making Authority for Subdivision and
Land Use AzTplications
City Attorney Field reported that at the Joint City Council/Planning Commission
meeting held July 30, 1990, the City Council directed the City Attorney to
prepare an ordinance establishing a clear line of authority between the City
Council and the Planning Commission with respect to consideration of various
development applications. He stated what is before Council is an ordinance
which does this.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if staff has reviewed and agrees with this
ordinance. City Manager Dixon responded that staff has reviewed this and one
change that was suggested by Mayor Parks with respect to Item No. 19 on
page four should be made. Currently it was felt that this item should be shifted
H i nut es\l 0\09\90 - 18- 10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
from approval by the Planning Director to approval by the Planning Commission
until such time as the City hires a permanent Planning Director.
City Attorney Field reported that within one or two days from the Planning
Commission meeting, Council would receive a copy of the action minutes so
the Council will know what has been approved and denied, giving eight days
for any Councilmember to appeal this decision.
Mayor Parks requested that Council receive Planning Commission Agendas and
Minutes. City Manager Dixon stated this will be done.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion
to adopt an urgency ordinance with the amendment of moving Item No. 19
from Planning Director's approval to Planning Commission's approval, entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-19
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY FOR
SUBDIVISION AND LAND USE APPLICATIONS
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
N i nut es \ 10\09\90
-19-
10/26/90
City Council Minutes October 9, 1990
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Lindemans requested that the Public Forum be changed from the first
Tuesday of the month to the second Tuesday of the Month when the meeting is
televised. He requested this be placed on the October 16, 1990 agenda for action.
Mayor Parks requested that monthly reports on the status of Assessment Districts be
forwarded to Council and suggested a facilitator to accomplish this task.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
adjourn at 11:03 PM, to a meeting on October 16, 1990 at the Temecula Community
Center, 2881 6 Pujol, Temecula.
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
14 i nutes\l 0\09\90 - 20 -
10/26/90
ITEM NO.
3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER~~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 30, 1990
Cancellation of meeting of November 6, 1990
PREPARED BY: Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION:
November 6, 1990.
Approve the cancellation of the meeting scheduled for
BACKGROUND: Tuesday, November 6, 1990 is election day and the Temecula
Community Center will be one of the polling places for the City. As a result of the
closing time for the polls and processing time for the precinct officers after the close
of the polls, the Community Center will not be available. We have been unable to
secure a satisfactort alternate location to hold the meeting.
ITEM
NO.
4
RESOLUTIONS NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of
$376,054,42.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 30th day of October, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Resos 109
r0
d:
[.,J I oJI
[3 ..'--
C3
t _ ! UJ
Z
C
C'
O'
C
-.
3 I
~-3.
C:
D_
tl.
;i;
b!
C.:
2.
C,
i _i C.,
, T
EC
Z
Cr~ C'
:9 1.> J
E '-. hi
,_'21 t, >
f - C,
,C,
,C,
C:,
FI rl
ij i Ij I
I CO
-4 ~. --4-
I ~- I
O- r_1
i~; ~ 'C:
,-'t.... Z
: [L
':} ~' C' Z
:2' , J C:' El
'-,.1: X
U_
bJ
::3
b.J
LL
Ld
r!'m
k'[
_J
C,, C,
b]
hi
Z I
!11
W
C,
C
Z
:C'
C' ~
hi
Z
:3
.'3:.
ZC'
~C'
fi!
>-
d'
u
7.
0
:-~ LFI
E:
.I,
n~
bj
C'
bq
C, ilJ
,C, Q
[l r ~
I I
,-r 4' hi
13'- i~ IL
I I 0
· ~ ILJ f] Z_
C, C, Z
LL
0
>-
b. U
LLt
i:j
>-
i-
h]
td
03 .[3
C, C,
C:,
I'll
b3
~, ,D-
,~ .... ,
,D X
::,
i]_
O]
W
.R t
WC:,
Q::,.~
13 b3
b_
[d
'C'
'::.
'C,
~, [I)
Q.
J
bi
C:'
b] o]
c,
,C!
C.
C~
,..,
C,
rl
Lm-
O'
fi,
C,
C, r3
,D
iz
z
w
rl
iZ
Ld
F.
:I:
L.q
,3,
,C,
C,
~fl
,D
:;',
.5
El :::3
c, ~
li.
Z
Z
0
Z
,D
O-
,C,
b3
C,
,C,
'3
Cl
[..!
t
C
I
I J
C, r3
0
U
__J
C,
C,
,D
5
E .... LI] · Z · · Z ·
.d,: b 'l [f] ['- CO
,'.
LO
C]
L]
0
Z
[3
r,t} 0
:C.' [Jl ~rj
O- ID Z ,1
".- ~ ~-~ bl z.~
,~ bl P } U
:>r-t ,9-
W fr~ t':; I-)
gl rr,
C' B
J U'
-"Z
Ld
0 0 C:'
0- ,:.~ Lr.
C:' 'C' t ,
,C,
03
C~
!'O
c,l
i.~
X
5
z_
F-
[.3
.::,
!p
0'.
o-
O-
UJ
>-
~..
E3
F-
bJ
>.
[L
0
C,
O'
C,
0
b~
,5
,
t :, r'- C,
1'~ rl
,.~ ,-;
l") (f'l
L1
_j
O,.
F- I
1) i"- C' L'~
._1 t1 12 I hi
h.
r.9
, '! ,Y L
C' .Z.'
'. fji '-
O' Ci C:'
C', <T *'
II ~'I 7Ti !! "
F] CN !2
'C' C] 'C
O' IZr. t;l U
'-
,-~ I19 , [L
O' . I 'C' Ci r~
'2
,TL' ,4 kt '
[1
f.I
~.~ d
!
~c
)
B
>
[-
i'?
C
0
~.~',
u
c
E
[]
,
O
* ,
, · · , , ~ ,
I
¢ D -8 '3 C, li3
b- 1'-, C, ,0 P3 01
{.lj P'- ~ f'l [":' W r--
0. C'.~ 03 --, El,_ q3
F- hi F- W
~ ,"."
LlJ ~' bj
CL ~ ~ CL
~ ~ Ld ,-'[
*IF- I:Dt I - I L.dl
Ei3 ~t U1 r) tZ ~ ,C, 03 ,.=, b'l IZ ,3
IZ h- 3 r'- -C' -8 CC r.'] 03
hi .~ .U'J · .Ld · · bJ ·
r.~b3 -~Ltl C. U] q'fJ3 H0-
-1:r-W-.~'rrlFr.':,,-l: I',, Zo-
bj 03 Z ~ W
F- -. ;.., LtJ Z
CC ~ E~ 0
_J bj 0 C3
~ _1 I'-
Lt. 0rl bL bl
C, O C; C,
iT- El' Er- ,'3'- 0'
ry. CO f~ "'
C, C: C, C, ,5,
03 03 UI O'l 03 03 OJ
bJ LtJ Ld LLI LU bl bJ
-J '~ J ft _t t'] _J -~ J f] _J C.I _J
r. fi 03 ~ U3 O} r, Fj O] 0
,C, ,:, ,C, '3 C, 2, F C,
WO'bJO'b.lO'lilO'WO'LdCf-bJ O' J
L] '-- O \ [.I \ (3 ',, [3 '-, C] \ U ~: \Ld
[L ,: L ['1 L. C't LL ~ Lk C'.4 11. C.I Lt. · ,"q k12
b..'.-h.'.Q.'.kL\LL-.W'.U_ t2
OC::C.,~O0-Og-OO-OO-Or_) O'F-
, . C, =_- v .~. C, O
C, ,-~ ';f ,"'- K,
~' ¢] Uq ,43 [13
C0 F] q- d3 ,q"
ry. ct- O- C0 O- O-
,C --, C, .4 -:. H ,2, ~ ,3, H ,5,
Z
0
[1')
b3
:g
0
O
O'
~-r.O
I
',4'
O-
r~
I
I O
0 ~
bJ
O3
E3
7
0
[)
O-
h-
,3
n3
[13
h3
..~,.
· ,
· , , · · ·
,D n3 0 C, C, 0 C,
C, C1 C, b3 [13 C, b']
."'. K z -~ 4 r-: u-; u';
03
I--I1'--I I I!.tlILLII
<r .'~ <c c. c. c, t9 c. ~ c,
C'l C, [1') b3 ~ O ~ [1') c'.l
:~ > .> · · .~ .w · ·
I-- Ix. F' '0 ~ b, f3 it3 [3 IO
$ 0 0 h h
O]
~ L~ Ld [D
O ~ fn Z Z
0_ O 0 [d bJ
O] fi_ El ffJ t!]
.C, ,C, C:, C, C,
H ('.$ C:'
'C, C, C[I 0"' Lq C0 'C, iIt O- rO
-.-, H Z C, ? Z ~ ..?: C, Z
f'J f'_q Lql rD
O1 4: (: <[ .. -~
O f J CJ 0 ~ C ) [ ) ..
E 0
bl ,'~; ,."j ~;P ~-"j ~i F'
r.D 0
C;, C, W C, W ~ L ,C, td C, Ld ~-
O'8~-f, gr,43q
~1--~'I~'~- llED~"O'f- U
"- 0 '-, ['3 ". F10 0 \ r3 '-, 0 r-
C, O] ,C, Ei 0'- ,i El. } ,:3, El. O' El. [3
'~ ~ 0 --, 0
C.
· ~ ,C, O0 0
fj] O,
13' 03 q3 ~
=~ 'C' I
~ b, '~ C, q' C" 'C' ~ 0 ~
[1'J h3 u] IJ3 h] h :l
C'l C'. C'.l t".~ C'l
";t' '..,t M'-1' q'
0' g' O' 0' U"
I~ ~- ~- ~- I> Cr-
I~ O' 0~ O- %
0 0 C, 0 C. .~.
~ I I I J
-- ~ ,~ . _J
c.., X ..... s. c.
h)
J
h~
rr
.j
C. 0
h') I,~
[13
C, C,
C:,
:g
kf ::) ,=', :' r", .11
b] h'i U3 b3 ~ ] b'i h ~
I t I i I I I
~ r_~ O' ~. ir i~- Ll'
O- C) O- O- O- i"r Fr u-
I :23 I I I ~ I
r3 2' tyr- ,:2, O- tl ?. 2
C, C, ,C, ,C, 2: ~ ;:: ;Z: . :.
Ld
F- ,'3 -:~
f3 LO Cq 'E
[0 J
Z _J Z
[tj ~ ;--.~ '--
~ m j LE ·
C3 F- F- ~
f5 r,j E} ~ ' C
,=, C, C, .=
,C, ,C, ,C,
-0 f-, rr] cr, ·:
b3 b3 b3 b3
bl b3 ~J3 b3
b3 b3 [13 63 b )
'~: '.~: .-=: .::, .-:
C
o
,:. :~: '::'
L.' r,r
O.i
>
:4'
C ·
U
Ci ili
E
,'- > 3
rn 0 b3 hq
If3 ~ h3,0
I.d
fll [J) C. g] b3 b3 Ld h-
Z. -, Ir h3 -fJ fl:: OD
_.1 _1
Z Z C9
01 fj] F-
fL ~
bJ bl 0
CL ~
C, ,C. C,
O- 0-
-0 <i C,
C' r_q ,C, ~
,3 Z '3, Z +J
,C, F* C, t-- I.- C,
I O] I I I 2: I ~._T I :.:3 i
I> Z O' bJ t'- -0 ~ ,5 W C:, e'Z C, ¢ ,2, C.. k* C, G] 03 r, -,3 CL .n C...i] F, ,2 7:> il, [ 1 oi
':' O ~ Ct. 0' ~ ~ C; ~ C l }- C' ~-- C' 'Z' E ': (3" {3" J if3 hi C' ;"~ i':+ 1}] IJ"l Z ;:2' !" ' T
· CO · ¢ ...... h, · · . O U · F- · · . ]'Z · ell · [!
r':, Co: ..rl B:: ,~ i'.'; Z ,~ W '~ ~ C, 0.. ~. ',~ W {'l '-?-, C'.~ U3 {'.~ ~ h, -C, C.i C'.l ,.1: .-~ !:.! L'b F-- ,.4
i'.'] Ld iT) 0 0:1 r-- ,-., li-i &. c'.l 0 C, 0 C, :C. U -o -/) - -{i } t-':+ E ,-~ Cl t":, J W] ¢:1 r'i 7_" 41
El. C.L - ~ C{: 3 hi C]
O'
-,
C.
C,
,.~
t-.-
Z [[1
txJ W
fi UD J -.'T r,-
~ ~.~ EL LO O'
C3 0- 3 ,3 Z C, _'? ~:
tti O' 3 ,-.. '7 ,-, Z +J > ¢-, c, Z
'C' 'C, I-- ,::, b- t-- C. Z EL t-- 'C' t-- C'
C' td I-- 'Z' :T C. ~ 'Z :
fl'_|13"..J ~ I CP'bJ {}_10'.3 t.}.l Q"UJ t'~.Jl.>..J O'>~ O'.l L'I'CC O' I(D O,C !rt
ZZ '-..'q ~'- B z~.: '--. '~ r 1 ". 3 "- _'1 .:~ \ ~I: '~. [J x..'3 ~ 71 Z ". ~ ~'~ -,- '- 3 \ h, '\ [ij qZ .~ '-. r'i " LE" . ,
Ii =-, 01 ':t 03 U '~' I b3 ,~ h- [0 r'- CO U ~ ~ r-') ;-~ P] C8 tI} (h U ~ ..j U -T [rj C.l ~::,c :-~ '> !Jl U C~ i:t :_.. lid U- { :?
· C' ~: :C' ~2 fil C) :2 :C' LL C' Z C.' Z {]J C.' I:3 'C' [L. :C' E "' Z $ IZ] F4 ~. I~l ~t Z :C' EL C"[ ~ _J rll ;2:, ~ jTr '> C[ CL
.E "-. 0 "- O J:: \ bj ~- LL '- 0 "- O r "- O \ W '- O '-- O 1: x :'_1 E '~. O ". Ld \ Z ,~ g. "6i '.. c':; - "i
C} C' f3 O' O L3 'C: E '3' O 03 r.] 0 [3 U C. LO 'C, O 'C' [3 0' [J [3 0' ~.i LE! [I O' [3 C, 17_: ~' [ ~': El 'Z' b- Lr =:[ !_: ii + !
~ C: , s ,'~ ::':' C: ,-': ,q =: 'C, C.: ,C, -~ ,C ! ::7.
C,
C:
b3
,5
t :, ,,--, O- C,
T ~ r.-:, ~ o- c.
· t -0 r-. o-
,...,-, CO * ~ ,C,
,:r-~- m m m .:.
O' [[i C13 03 E:I 0 [2' 'C' C, Oq C0 ~I
~' '=f ~ '~ C.I ',i'
C"i /'i 0'} El C4 Ci C'.t
b ] G3 E b] bl b ] h ]
I I LLI I I t I
g'l ['i h- Ui C'i LIj ['i f'i
I I >- ~' I I-- t I
,3- 0- Crj 0'- O- ~ i3-
O- ~ O' L} O' ~, O- A'-
0- 0 Lq O-Z O'L] O,
I t Z I ~-~ ICl I 1
'C' C: ~ U' 0'- 1'13 C, C,
b3 b3 J 0' - 0'. rj1 b') b3
I ~ I 0 I
'.>:!.,o
J C, Z C, UJ
¢ ¢ Ln
E
0 W
Ld
F-
Z
Z
+_, r; ,"'3
,¢
LLI
Ld W
O3 b..
C) C, O
O- O- O'
I'- h- P.-
C, C,
C'l t-')
~ -0 -0
U') u3 b3
b3 b3 b3
:
C' 1~3 t'9 C,
O' 'C' C' O'
H t':' ,5 0"
C' t":' ~ ':-,, ('4
C, :2: ..... 0'-
:-~ t'- ~, 'C' ~ On ,~- L~ 'Z'
q3 C'.l ~
C i C 1 C'i C'i
h] b] b]
Itd I ill I I
0' f_l ~' F- i> [1-
O' ~-~ rJ,-~T ,D-
O-.L> 0'~-, O'-
ICZ: IL3 t I
C, ~ U- 0 C,
I W I ~ I 'i'
:C'LL C:
F 0 Ltl J
4 C] 'E 0 r i
> i3 0 Z
O - F- ._7
..1 Z. [_] z · ,
>- ~ 0 u.
-'I: ~ :I:
Fr' ~[ O ;-;
tI _J ;3 ,.-, b_
O ~,I fZi
C. C, C, ,:, C,
,s, I'-. h- ;'-
' S 3 '
C, C, ,?,
· .0 -~ -O q'J
I[) tj~ ID ll~ U3
b3 [i1 b3 b3 b3
':' ':= i!i
o .:, ::
C, .C, :: C:
~ O' O, ~-
t.', C'4 -, ,
C,, cO' z, :_:.- _
[~ ~J [3 b3 b] bJ
Iji 0' ([ i'r rl- u i]
[i J [_J 0" W 0' ri O- A
Ci LTj } ,:C. [I 0-
~' [I t!j .-: ~i ....
C, C, m C: C, ,,T 0 Z
W
F- ra
LO I
Z
_rj
O CC
z
bJ g
F- [r~ bj
U] - 7
o a. E
,.'--, C
?- D- r-
-5
C, c 4
b] b] b ]
e {.
:B
>
C] I
o3 ·
~T
q:] rJ t13 ~ C: ('.4 r.':, I'- 43 ,~ 113 0- q3 rT__l ,.?., i},. i:n Cr. .-~ t:1- 0- r_~ i~-
.-; .: o: ,,';o:K ~ K j ,-: 4 ~:. ,.; c~ d > u'; > ~': > .~ >- r.: o:dcdd
~| .~ IT~ r-- I'-- C, ,-~ E'I ..a Ci F- ~. t- ~.) D: C'J ~ ~ ~ (i: Cc: t:; f~ fx
F') 121 CI ,-q ~j [0 b,l . , hi b] LLI r..- ~r
(]: ¢ bJ bJ Ld 1-- F. H H H H t:3 ~
O~ Gg ¢ ¢1:: ¢ O O C.1 W Ld W ,Ld E ¢ ~ T: ) C.,
13:: ~ d / _J LLI bJ W n
I I ~-~ I H I :Z I Z I Z I LLI t LLI I hi I T .'l: I CL I E. I Ii. I EL I I Z I 23 I I I :D i ':Q I i2
[~- h*] :~ r-- ~: ,:, !3L I~'lCL t"]~ ~L 1'- b3 -0 [1] ,-q01 h ) f3 rJ- (.B 421 F- 01 F- ,:, F- i> F- Or- 1} j _4 - 0'. G-
q: rd] Ld · LLI · - . - · - . _1 · d · _J · r.j-j . ffj _j . >, . . .
fi. ~ t. 3 F- I-- ¢ -~ <I: ~ b. LL h. -..~ C~ , ~ ~ C:I 121 I'- q' Ld
r j O C3 O b! bJ ILl CL 0. ~: ~ <]: ¢ C.. I
F- I T ' b,J Ld r 3 bJ
m .J cc cr z z z E E cc m u3 ' o{ ' * ~ z z !... ~
cj F- t- P- I-- F- ~ ~21 ~ _ l J CY. t'K G~ fE I r3 r 2 Z + r:
(:d ~-~ 21 :D IJJ t.'J hj Z Z Z H ~-~ hi W bJ Ld
P t-~ [L ~ _l J _1 LtJ tH [d 'J 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ gO > >- :C !
CJ LL! O Lq O C.93 3 :J ¢ ¢ CE hi bl H ~, ~:/ ~/ \ ~Z ~! Z 'Z
· 2:, C, C, I ,C, ::E C, C, C. C, ,.;, 2 C, C, C, C, ,S, C, C, C, ,D C
O' O- 0- 03 O- U} O' 13'- 0' 0- 0' 0' r.O 0- ~' 0' 0' 0' C~ C'- O- O' !3
"' " "~::3~" " " " " .... " :3" "' " " "' " " "
r.~ r-- 03 ,3, _ i'.':. r:, r.:, ¢ ,l-. -I- c! cl C, C, ,D h3 ~,
-
x. x.Z ",3x. 2]\ \ "-, '- \ "- ~ "- '- \ "- "- "' '~ "' '
C, F",- bl O' {L O' LL ,2, 2 .2 " m ,-, CO Or- 0'- '} e' 'C' O' O" .C'
...... , ~ ,S' '2' -, '-'.'
03 03 C3 I-- I-- [.0 03 [0 03 03 03 tjrj 03 rj"j 03 Crj 03 cO r_f) ..
Ill !d CE Z Z ILl td ill tLt [IJ bJ l. ll bJ LiJ hi LU IJI 111 L!l
FII _J b3 _J '0 __r C'l ~ (1 ~ b3 _J b] J 1!3 _J b3 .j U3 d b'J j C' J '2.' ,l '~ J ~ J H J ,-~ _l m t~, J _J
:S, 'u_ ,C, EL 'D ~ ,S, ~ '3' CL C, gt. C. I:L. C' CJ.. C' Ii ,2_., fi C, (1, C, EL C' EL ,3, IX C., EL C' n. r0 C' [L EL [3 '3' CL -0 EL C
Cr-D t3-3 Or>- O- _'] 0- 3 0- 'n 0- B 0- _'3 0- B O- .'3 0- _'n 0- B 0- U 0. D0'30-B~-~&J (i} 0- 3 :J + 0' B ,C, 'n C
Ij] U"J O: r:~ Ei 03 if) {j3 fJ'J rB {D 03 i'j~ [j3 rfj ill 03 O td 03 {0
C, 'D C. ¢ .:;' W "" W ,S, .S. C, ,2, ,~. ~ " ' 'D "' ,S. ,", b- ,D;, C, L 2'
0' LLI O' W Ch 12/.: G"' C~' ~ ILl I:."" ILl O' |1t 0" LLJ O' bj ~ t.11 ~" IJ, J ~. ILl Er' LLJ 13" Lij O' ill O' ILl ~ (~ L~ LU LtJ ill L'r' LLJ 13' {LI 12-
\L] "-[J '--.F'3 \Jx. Jx. tl'--.iJx-El'--[.j\rj\CJ'--tJ\[J'--rl\[Jx.U"-[]~ x,~.~ '-,[1C) E\Cj"..C]"-i
~3 ~ b'] ~ [' 4 I:1. t':, _j ~1' , J IZI ~-~ 0' ~-, Cr' i-~ O' ~ ,2, ~'~ C' ~-4 L!3 i~ 0' ~'q 13" ~ ~ '-D ~-~ b3 ~ '-~ ;-'~ U [t'] J t} .-i H I 1 !13 ~ ~3 ~-~ :"~
171 {l. C., LL C:* _r__ ;~ <Z .-t ~ C:, 1.1 C.' LL C:' LL C' tk ~ LL ~ LL C: tJ. C'~ IL .'~ LL t"'l [L r'! tl t~'J LL ed ,.':, ~-~ C:, t.1. Lt.
'- LL "-, LL ~ [Jj "'- ~ "-- 'E~ x. W "- h_ "'-- [l 'x LL x,. IL "- LL "'- [L \ LL "-- LL x. h, '- LL '- I.L 12 "- t" \ [1 LL 0
o. CJ C. Cj CO ~ 0- ZB O- (.q C, O .C, O ,c, O ,c, O ,c. O C, C3 C, Ci [:13 O C~ O ~ O It- O t O (3 .C, 3 C, O O
C' H C' "'-* r'.l C..' ,H f I C' C.' C' ~ C ,~
C' ! I I ! I I I I I I I I t I '2'
IZt O' ,2.,C' b3 U3 b3 O' 0' 0' t:, .;.] h3 b3 h3 0' 0'
iJ" ~t' C~ 4] ~ ,-4 .~ ,~ r"- ~" r~ C'4 ~- ~ -~ []1 IJ'j ~. C'! ~' g'O j )
0-. B3 :S, 03 ~ ~T ~' ~' --T ~ ~' .~ ~] O- ~' O' C, C:, r-- t -. r- r.
,"'- t' 2, {0 O' O' ,', ,'. ,', ,'. C' C' ," O' O' O' O' C., C, 03 b'.' ij ) t' L, ,,
tl ,D C, ,:, C, ~ CO C'.I '.:Qc'-I ~ C, ~' C, ~" ."'. ~" ,-, Q'- C. 0'- C, ~- ,9 m .:, rr, C, CO ;:, C..9C., Cr- ,:, =', C, ~1 C, C, Ci ::.:. !: tC, ': a, ~ '.' ~ E~
El C'-I ~, --t q ('1 C.1 C'.l Cl rl r.l El rl El C 1 I:'1 C./ ,..i- I"-~ ITl fl ,'l f i i 1
Cl C'l r'.l C'4 C"t C'l C.J rl c.l [,4 cl c, [l iTl C| 17'l ti C'l C'.~ Cl fl ,74 i i
h'] h3 b'] b'J b3 h'j b3 b3 if] b'} b3 U3 b'} b ] b'j b'] h ] b'j b3 ~ ] b j u ) u j b i
I I I I i t t I i I I I I I I I i I I I I I , i!~
C'! C't CI C'l C'I C.l C'.l C'.l [.-I C'l ['.i iT'.l C'.l C'.l t'l f'l i'l C'.l C'-I I:1 i.'l ,i i I
I [0 I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I k
O' LL i]'- []' > O' l::h O' O' Ij- O' O' [:r i1' II- i:b L3' ~' 0' iJ' ~ Cr- i'l'- u' ir
O- !': rJ- rj} 0- a O. ~ 0- 0, ()- 0- o- o- 0- G- o- Cr- ~ 0- O' 0- 0'
O, i}- Ld O- CL O' O- O' el- O- O' 0" Ft- O' r~ ~ 0' 0- G' Z 0' 0'
I 13. i fi I ii. I I I I I I I t I ! I I I I _F'I t I I
O- ~ O' EE O- 03 ~t ~- O' O' 0'- 0" [J" 0" i> r,"- O- Cr- O' 0' H L'r- O- U'
-' '- ' ;' T 7 " -' '" " " ';' " " "' 'r ""
C., iZ C. C, .-, O C, .3 ,j u ,~, ,D C. C, LL C,
C, hi C, F C, LL O C, C. O ,~' C. '_' _ ' C, C, C, ,5 ~' '-:':'
:3
,'r'
L]
Ld
F'-
1
~2 rr- Cr ,'- , ,,
c', ,i: Li: . t
'3 C, ' ':
hl
c
0
u
c-
O
u
<I
131311 ~1 ~1 Zl gl .I.IRII I I
i.- I--- t'4 ,1'.9 ¢
b, W h
LLI ~
C9 {.9 L] O3
Z Z LLI
,--, ,.-, ,-r
Z Z O · >-
¢ ¢ ~. LL ' _1
hi Id E
.J _1 LLI 1::1
U O P ¢
I'-T'-,I X \
Z\Z'--Z ~
~-OhO~- O O
b~ LW W
W W hi .. .J
W r~ rtul ~W
Z Z -LL - ,'r,
O LLI t') ~ ,-.b~'-.-7
7 Z
U~ ~r UJ LLI
LLI ~ tr W
..J ~
LU C3
O L.I LJ g
P 0 0 O
0 0 C, '3 C'
h h r,,,h U'3
\ 'X \ '%.
CL
0 O O0 ~ ~ h ~ 0 O OO
0 0 h 0¢ 0~ 0¢ O 0 0 0 h C'
Z~ZC'4Z~ C'E ~> ~ f"l~ D'IZ01ZO'IZ~ C'W O
C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, ~
q' I I
m C' O b3 C, 0
h O- O' ~ O' 0'-
~ -0 I*.) r.9 q' C. I',- r'-
C0 Cr- b3 --~ C'I ~3 DI D.I
~ ~ C' m ~ O- O'
r.':, t.'3 r"3 ~ - bl C'l C'l t*') t"'*
43 b3 bmJ bI b3 bl b3 b'3 b3
I I I t I I I I t I
C'I l"l C'l O C'I ('.1 ~ C'l IDI C4
I I I I I I I I I I
I ! I I I I O I I I I
I I I ~-~ IIZ tl7.~ rj'j I I
<I C,W OO OZ . C,W 0 O
0 ~ O I-- O n C, rr ' ,':, Z O
0
W:
F- '
rj'}
F-
>
n
¢
E [AJ
I-
~ C.
O-
P,, h,
--,
CO
b'} b3
bl, b3
,"', 0
ILl
W Z L ·
U3
ILl 01
J x Z
F.-
U'I W 03
x
C, .D
O- O- O-
r,- ,'-- r,,-
0 ,3, C,
r.'~ ct U3
co ~ CO
to ij'3 .
[j"3 h3 ~ [J'3
0 : 0
0 . 0
E
O
u
0
L
~g
! ~ tq
~ u;
Cu
E j
~0
n.
C' "' C' LO b':l C' 0 C' C' C' C' 0' O' b'} I0 ~' b3 O' ~ ~ C' 3 C'
Ix`. ~ t":~ F) ~ ':f i"- ~ [". I"'- ~ ~-i 4] '0 ~ ~ O' f3n C' :__,~ I]3 ii] '0 f,[I IO l"- ~x
t:~ t"~ c'| c'i c'I c'~ ~ ~ f'l c"~ ,,I 0' ~I' 1"- P- C, , -~ c I ! !
4 ......
h') ,', ,4 U- q- I )
~ 4 C l -0 r'.i O-
C, C, 'D ,=, C' .':'_.0 C, ':.' C. C, .-J u ,C, C. C, C, C, .C. C, C' C ~ C,
d ,S c: d d d .S d d d .S d d d ~ . .S .S d d d d d c: d ;S d d ,S
O' I- LL
CO Z Z r-t-
I ~. C3 Crj i0 .rr'. ',
O) O'- ] f3 L3 i'3 I
1-- td ,-~ ZE C' I- ft. '..,
LD O H C' x ~ tO I :7;
t- rr LL Z -J F~ ~ 03 IZD 'J4 ~ :J !' In
('l bl 4[ H I.- b._ ~Z ,:2:., "Z
~.~ LL Z Ill f( { ] I]] I EJ , !; ,
O III LI i'-- ~" D bj ,j j 90
ra _ ,~ h. ~:.[
[lt 4J O 4J 4J _J 4~ 4~ H 4J H' ,P LL 4.J -I l ZI 4J LL LL P Fi: ~j , ,*
h_L O [L 0 LL 0 Ei_ 0 ,.7.., O 1 O 0 O '~ 0 O] O t3 O O U_I 0 [I; J
fe: I.- Ld F- O ~- F- O' F- O] F- hi F ld F ILl F - Z F- ~ - U] , - Z ' ; ,:
LLI 121 _J x. E~: Z bJ _J h, W id :' rO
O_ X ~ I-- '-' ([ v ~3 ~ bJ ~ H ~; LL ' '.3 _~ ~ ~.' p' ..' J .' Lrj '
CC ~11 r'] Ill E i'~ Z I~ J 'x ~ r. rl __. I~ CE Ill iZj ii~ f ) I1~ LL Ill I +Z 'a [[J an ~ [ ~
U j: '-. J:: >- 1:: LLt Z:: hi ~., J:::_l W E C LLI C W C H C EL ,:i. r td c: · '! x ,
':~ Cj ,4:t (] D. O ID [J:>,-~ CJC[Z: IZI_j~:]: L3ZC~ Ca Q:: () -J (J D3i'_O (} ,] LJ[].ll.d
DI H ILl ~ Z Z
O C, nC,
0- 13,- 0-
-,. ¢-,, ._1\
-0 ~-.0
'-- a:\ O\
O C] C. _] O
¢ 0
U CO
b_
_l b~
O (l:C, rr'C,
ZO' OO'
~4] I---8 ~,
) ,3 ~ C, f_] O
U
0..,D ZC, JO
),0- ldO- ~o-
,,1:-0 ~ [.)P-.
,.~S OS Og
0..--** it.,--, 0...,~
-,. -~
r-- i-- 0,
\ .-,,
C, O O
CO CO
h3 b]
O O O
O O : O
u O , O
C, ,:D C,
U C'
[L \
\
Lq ,D
_J
:3
.¢
~-~
:,,
I.L '-.
OO
U~
,D '~'
\
O
0
0-
113
g
:> C' H C' C, C' C, O hi C' ~ , :.: :3, .
c'- m'- '- '- '---- z'-- ":'~T
F- 0'
l=:lx. '~.'-. ', ,Z/ '-, l'3'x F - '-
J o
!d .'.
tb t--
~ Z _1 [~ Z (0 10
LLI
D
~ [d --I: 'C, C, _.J f l
tll C1
m C. C9 C' D C. .~ C, C. ,3 C, ~/_ ::' C, _c f
O 0' 0'
_J \ J X. Z" "- LLI "- ;.t \ '-, Ld x, (0 '~ "- "
O \ ([ ". · "- :I: "~ '~ _,'3. \ <IZ ". ', i: '
3 ,C, ..J ,C,
.,--,
I11 Z
LT~ _'~ >- ] :::
J
~ ,3,
Z 0'
.y. .:, , ~ ~ g .-0 ~:, ~-:,
,::) ,_, ,-,
O' '-*
' ' ' ' A ~ 7:: 2:::
O' 0' 0' 0'
O C, C, 0 C. 'C,
b] b'l b3 b3
bl b3
0 C, ,', O C, C :, ,' ',
o ,^. , :? o :? .:'. .::.
O ,~, C, C,
L
u
, Ol
dJ; ~
r.
Fi U
,.~
[)
U
uI
~j
d .j d d j .~ d .j .j d .£ d d d d d d d .£ d .~ .5 d d .j .:j d d j :,
U3 ,:::, ,_, ..43 43 D.I C, 0 -0 ,8 -0 ~ C, ,.C, Cl [,1 ,D C, C, b3 b3 b:! b3 C, C, -1- ,C;
O- C, 3 -O ,~ C9 b') b] C, ,C: r:, r.':, C.~ ,c, ,~, :~: r- ~'- C, C, c'.l n-- ~ C4 ~.4 :. C 4] C, r:
_.1
j
Z
LLI b.I LLI
Ul _r. Z Z
n. 03 I Z
3 L~
,--.,E
r. Bj
0"3
(3
2~>.
J~
EL U
bJ Z
Id E 7 22_ tO .'-
/ O L; <I: ~-1:: C, J --j
01 L} bJ f-- t-- f'~
~ Ia 0303 "- Z 'Z.
LLI r3
'T' [L Z I.'FJ ate ~'.I
O 00
hJ
;-,0 00
[_]O-
0'--
03 h3 C,4 C.i
Z"-
O ,3, r-- r--
F-
q:
ILl
8:::
Ld ml'-,
CC ,0,,0
<?j C,C,
~ 0 0 O
n~3
4:'-
O0 nO0
J f-I
:> I I
k-'[ K, l-9
1:3 C'l C'.4
I I
C:, O' O'
C.
,3.
..0
~3
,-,
C,
C,
L1 b3
C,
0'-~
O
F'.,
b3
g
'3' C,
e- o30-
\ b.I \
-o r]-.-,
-,.
C., ~ C,
03
)
LLI
.-=.. ~.
C3 ~r--
t- gL
[9 'D
2:0" ZO'
4:~
I 0 E 0
EE,:, O
~:0- r3
Z: -0 El'9
O
K,
0
",0;
~'3 b3
0 ,C,
C: C,
C:, C,
C, C.,
'C. C' C, C, .3' C'
0" 0'- O, Or-
~,. [[) ('..t .j
, T H EL C' C' Z C:' ·
'~ Ld \ EL
,3, I-- ,C, :::3 C, .C, 113 ,C,
>_
IU U'J Ld Ld
~4 LI3 >" ~ LL
Fr.~ F-
6L '3' ~, W
,'r' C, O
LLi ,..8 .D
F .D O
Z ILl ,'~
Ld C, r~ C, ' ,', .', E.C: ,", ,C,
03'- hi'-, EE\'-- :I:\ LL'-.
LO ~ C) C"4 hl
bJ 0 H ~
E\ li:'--
!21...:, EL '3. IZ 0.3 0') C, O3 ,C,
I-- O ~ C]
Z Ld
r.O C, ILl EC C:I C, b
03 O' [-) W ,*4 C' ill I ~T
Ll,l '3' H :> I I ~ '3' E C'
IZ "', IZ ~ '4" ",:1' {3 O- r] C,-
Cs.. ~ 8_ m ~ ~ -~ 03 b'3 rO b3
.J ~ ,¢ C,
o .:. H.:,oc,.:..:.,:
O'ft' (r-(4
O 0 C. n C,
r.') t.':, t.':,
O C, C, ,C,
~ 0- C, . ~ P'.~
I J3 b3 lid l j3 b3
O 0 C, .D
o :~: c, c, ,5
,:,') ,C, C, ,C,
o .5 .:. :
FJ
,-
· , rd
~ i .~ Q
,~
c
0
I]J
r~ C]
0.
C (' C" ~'
'C, C, u '3. C, C, O
CD
t- h LL
L(
b.
Ld O Z O ,',z.L,3 O
F F- Q F, ~'3 Z
Z T ~-Ld
~ I U r], j~-~ U O
~ ~ CC ~1 ICe t.Ca QJ
L'3 r ~ r 0C3 r'
t-D Cl C] U {] C_l O
C, C, C,. ,:D
LO
Z
C, ~ C, Z 0 0
0 CO C, 3 CO ~
E~ Z
t-- .J
OCh
,,0 LO0'
t.'l
C,
I 0
C, C,
ITEM NO.
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 30, 1990
First Extension of Time
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
Minor Change No. 1
PREPARED BY:
Richard Ayala
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Coleman Homes
REPRESENTATIVE:
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
PROPOSAL:
Eighty 180) lot residential subdivision of 28 acres.
First Extension of Time.
LOCAT ION:
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road,
west of Ynez Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
Specific Plan 180 l Rancho Highlands)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: R-A-5
South: SP 180
East: R - 1
West: I - 15
ResidentialAgricultural,
acre minimum)
Rancho Highlands)
One-Family Dwellings)
l Interstate 15)
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
STAFFRPT\TM22761 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Multi-Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Interstate 15
Total Acreage:
No. of Lots:
Open Space Lots:
Proposed DU/Acre
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
28
80
1
2.8
7,200 sq.ft.
BACKGROUND:
First Extension of Time application for Tentative
Tract Map No. 22761, Minor Change No. 1 was
submitted to the City on July 6, 1990. On October
1, 1990, it went before the City of Temecula
Planning Commission and was approved by a 3-0
vote based on the analysis and findings contained in
the Staff Report and subject to the attached
changes to the Conditions of Approval per the
request of the Planning Commission. First
Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
was approved by the Planning Commission prior to
adoption of Ordinance 90-19, which gives final
approval authority to the Planning Commission for
this type of project. Therefore, the case is being
forwarded to the City Council as a Receive and File
item as required prior to adoption of Ordinance
90-19.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Department Staff recommends that the City
Council:
RECEIVE AND FILE the First Extension of
Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 22761,
Minor Change No. 1, based on the analysis
and Findings contained in the Report and
subject to the attached amended Conditions of
Approval.
RA:ks
Attachment:
Planning Commission Staff Report
dated October 1, 1990, including
all attachments
STAFFRPT\TM22761 2
CiTY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution. (Amended per Planning Commission October 1,
1990. )
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Sectio~
10.35 of Ordinance No. ~60 has been previously satisfied or an agrLN~-~rt with
CSA 143 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land
divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in
accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. ~60. The agreement shall be
approved by the City Council prior to the recordat/on of the final map.
(Amended per Planning Commission October 1, 1990. )
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit
within the project boundary until the developer"s successorbs-in-interest
provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A
cash sum of one-hundred dollars {$100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with
the City as mitigation for public library development.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
it is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
STAFFRPT\TM22761 1
5. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-d-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office,
in addition to any other permits required.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a precise grading plan to the
Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Buildir~g
Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval· The plan shall be drawn on 2~" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer. {Amended per Planning Commission October 1, 1990. )
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
10.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
11.
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
12.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in affect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
STAFFRPT\TM22761 2
{:fiNMISS!ON MINTT'P~:S OCm 3, 39qO
Nng2~: · None
MAP NO. ~276[., EXTENSION OF TIME and
MAP NO. 22762, EXTENSION OF TIME
Prior to neari. nq thlR item, COMMISSIONER CRINIAEPF stepped down
due to a conflict of interest and turned the gave] over to Vice
Chai rman COMMISSIONER FORD.
Proposa I for f~ rst extens~ on of time on project ] ocated
.~outh of Rancoo Ca l.].forni. a Road, west of Ynez Road and
easterly of I--,]5.
,] :{ ,
Proposal for fArst extensjnn of time on project located
.south of Ranchn CaLifornia Road, west of Ynez Road and
easter] y of I-11 5.
RICHARD AYAI.A provided the staff report on this item.
COMMISSIONER FORD questioned if the applicant was part
n~ a ~eve{opment agreement. The app]~cant conf~rme~
that they did have a development agreement.
RTCNARD KLASSEN. Co]eman Homes, 42850 Aqena Street,
m~mecui. a, requested cLari.~cation of the tot.[owing
Conditions nf ADproVaj: No. 11, Mr. K.lassen stated
that the site has al. ready been graded; therefore, the
SKR fees have been satisfje~; No. 2, Mr. K]assen
questioned park and recreation fees. GARY THORNHILL
stated that they wnu]d satisfy th~s requirement under
the development agreement; therefore, the Condition
should read "pay the fee or sat.~sfy toe the County
requirement". Mr. Klassen also requested that Condition
No. S be modified to read "precise grading plan".
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to approve the First
Extension of Time and to approve Tentative Tract
Map No. 22761, Minor Change No. 1, subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval amended as follows:
MIN .10/1/90 -13- 10/10/90
06/01/01 -~1- 061I/OI'NIN '\
· .~!;eu;D eL('.), u4 peu.~n'J,d.x ..(e~:.(YINIiHD M~N{JIScJINHOD
puelbeoH
:S1t-~NOISSINNOD 't :~NMSg~
: S~{'-~NOISS INNOD 1; :
~uoN : SltaNOI BS 1NNOD 0 :
: SM'-~NO ISS [ I, iNOD E
pue 16eoH
:SIdSNO1SSII414OD 1
~uoN : Stt~NOl SS INNOD 0 : SMON
P-xo,d ' Aeqed ' ~ .~e [H
: Sa~NO 1 SS [ NNOO E
Oh6 [ ' I ~'-,HidO.LDO S'-wddlNIN NOI)~i~ [NNO;) UN | NNY'Id
Case No.:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 1, 1990
First Extension of Time
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
Minor Change No. 1
Prepared By: Richard Ayala
Recommendation: Approval
APPLiCATiON iNFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Coleman Homes
Robert Bein, William Frost 8 Associates
Eighty J80) lot residential subdivision of 28 acreS.
First Extension of Time.
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road,
west of Ynez Road.
Specific Plan 180 J Rancho Highlands)
North: R -A-5
South: SP 180
East: R - 1
West: I - 15
ResidentialAgricultural,
acre minimum)
Rancho Highlands )
One-Family Dwellings)
Interstate 15 )
Not requested.
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Multi-Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Interstate 15
Total Acreage:
No. of Lots:
Open Space Lots:
Proposed DU / Acre
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
28
80
1
2.8
7,200 sq. ft.
S'TAFF R PT\TM22761 1
ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
Specific Plan No. 180, Rancho Highlands, was
adopted by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on June 5, 198L~. Amendment No. 1 to
this Specific Plan, Change of Zone No. 5105, and
Tract No. 22761 were adopted by the Board on July
18, 1988. The Amendment switched Planning Area
Nos. 8 and 9 iTract No. 22761) from the very low
residential category of 0-2 DU/AC to the low
residential density category of 2-5 DU/AC.
Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract No. 22761
was originally approved by the Riverside Board of
Supervisors on November 14, 1989. The application
was submitted for the reconfiguration of streets and
adjoining lot layouts to increase land use and
circulation efficiency.
Tract Map No. 22761, Minor Change No. 1 is a
proposal to subdivide approximately 28 acres into
eighty {80) single family residential lots with :a
minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The subject
site is located south of Rancho California Road, west
of Ynez Road and easterly of 1-15.
Desiqn Considerations
The proposed subdivision has been designed in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance Nos.
348, 460 and Specific Plan No. 180. The main access
to the project is Preece Lane. The project has been
designed to provide increase land use and
circulation efficiency.
Density
The proposed subdivision (Tract No. 22761, Minor
Change No. 1) according to Specific Plan 180,
requires proposed subdivisions to range from 2-5
DU/AC. The proposed subdivision consists of 2.8
DU/AC. Thus, meeting Specific Plan No. 180
density requirement for residential development.
The proposed density of 2.8 units per acre is
consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan.
In addition, Staff finds it probable that this project
will be consistent with the new General Plan when it
is adopted.
STAFFRPT\TM22761 2
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
On July 18, 1988, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors adopted a Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment Nos. 31943 and 31084 to
be applied to Tract Nos. 22761, 22762, and 21760,
Amended No. 2, at which time determined that the
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract No.
22761, Minor Change No. 1 will mitigate any
environemtnal concerns.
There is a reasonable probability that
Tentative Tract No. 22761, Minor Change
No. 1 will be consistent with the City~s future
General Plan, which will be completed within
a reasonable time in accordance with State
Law.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted General Plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws·
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the circulation
patterns, access, and density.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare.
Tentative Tract No. 22761, Minor Change
No. 1 is compatible with surrounding land
uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height,
density, and coverage is likely to create a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties.
The proposal will not have an adverse affect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Initial
Study for this project.
STAFFRPT\TM22761 3
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with this application are herein
incorporated by reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
APPROVE Tentative Tract Map No. 22761,
Minor Change No, 1, based on the analysis
and findings contained in the Staff Report
and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval·
RA:ks
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
STAFFRPT\TM22761 4
del/I uo!~,eoo-I
rjv I,t )~ I~ ) hIS
_':,tl~\.'~ll
tDIH c '~HDN'v'~,J
111%1%15 Illl
VHON~
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with CSA
143 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land divider has
provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with
Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the
City Council prior to the recordation of the final map.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit
within the project boundary until the developer~s successor's-in-interest
provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A
cash sum of one-hundred dollars I$100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with
the City as mitigation for public library development.
Enqineerincl Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
5. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
STAFFRPT\TM22761
Plannin9 Department;
Engineerin9 Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be and
an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2LP x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer·
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
10.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer·
11.
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
12.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
STAFFRPT\TM22761 2
RiVERSiDE county
PLannin DEP RCI EnC
DATE: December 27, 1989
TO:
Applicant
EnO/meer
~urveyor
~uilding & ~fety
~ C~l
Heal~
Fi~ P~tectton
RE:
Minor Change No. 1
Tenter/re Tract/Parcel Map No. 22761
Regional Team No. Specific Plan Team
The R/verstde County [ ] Planning Director iX ] Board of Supervisors has taken the Following
action on the above referenced tentative map:
X
APPROVED Minor Change to revised originally approved conditions as shown (attached).
AP P RO VED Minor Change to revise originally el>proved map (attached).
DENIED request for Minor Change.
APPROVED Minor Change to waive the final map.
Approval of this Minor Change does not chance or effect the ezpiration of the originally
appr~ved tentotlve map or any subsequent eztensiona of time.
Very truly ~
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Roger S. Sireater, PEruruing Director
GAN:aea
11-08-89
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501
/714t 7R'/-RIR1
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619} 342-8277
IUINTrT/d. TO THE IOARD Of iUPERVlSORS
COUNTY Of IUVIZSmF, rrATE OF C.,dJ~ORN~A
rltON: Planntng Depar~ent IUIMffTA~DATE: October %9, %989
14JIIE~: NOTICE OF DECISION OF NINOR CHANGE REQUEST ACTED 0N BY ' ""
THE PLANNING COHHISSION ON August 26, 1989 for the Foliowin9
Case.
RE~ED lOTION: ~E :' ' '
RECEIVE AND FILE the Nottce of Deds~on for N~nor Change Req~'eSt
for the following case.
The Planntng Comtsston
APPROVE/) NINOR CHANGE N0. I for TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 22761,
subject to all prevtous conditions and based on the f~ndtngs and
conclusions ~ncorporated ~n the Planntng Commission mtnutes dated
August 16, 1989.
'° 'RG:FB:mp
AGENDA NC
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CONNISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 16, 1989
Mr. Kenble said on Page 8, Condition Z3.a. requires that "prior to issuance of
grading peaits, that they submit detailed cartoon open space area landscaping
and irrigation plans.' He requested that that be changed to the building
pemtt stage in order to be consistent with the conditions and standards
outlined in the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. Mr. Gol~an maid that that was
acceptable. Mr. Kemble then referred to Page 12, Condition 24.f (top of page),
which requires building separations Including fireplaces be not less than ten
feet. He asked that that state excludtn fireplaces in order to allow the one
foot encroacl~en% for chimneys which ButVding and Safety allows. Mr. Gol~an
advised that that would be consistent with Rancho Highlands ms well, There was
no one else who wished to speak for or mgatnst the matter,
The hearing was closed at 2:16 p.m.
MOTION: Upon motion by C~mtsstoner Turner, seconded by Camtsstoner Beadling,
and unanimously carried, the Camtsston mpproved Tentative Tract No. 22761,
Minor Change No. 1, subject to the conditions u a~ended this Gate.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
jULY 26, 1989
(AGENDA ITEM 6-1 - Tape 2B)
TRACT MAP NO. Z2761, MINOR CHANGE NO. 1 - EXEMPT FROM CEQA - Glen Fed
Devel oimnent Co. - Rancho Cali forni a Area - Ftrst Supervi mori al Di strict - 80
lots - 28~ acres - mR Zone - Schedule A- MINOR CHANGE REQUEST:
Reconftquratton of Cu1 m-de-sac and Ad-tacent Lots
Hearing was opened at 2:48 p.m. and was continued to 2:00 p.m. on
August 16, 1989.
Staff requested a two week continuance of this its in order to allow for
sufft ct ent time for revtew of this case.
TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT:
Robert Km~ble (28765 Stngle Hope Drtve, Rancho California) advised that they
are tn concurrence wtth the two week continuance. No one else wtshed to
ca~nent.
MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconcled by Commissioner Donahoe,'
and unanimously carried, Tract Map NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1 was continued
to August 16, 1989. at 2:00 p.m.
33
Zontng Area: Rancho California
$upePvtsortal DIstrict: Ftrst
$pectfic Plan No. :tSO (Rancho HIghlands)
Ikvelopment Agreement leo. 3
$pectfic Plans Team
Case: Tentative Tract No. 2Z76:Z
Htnor Change No. 1
I. lppltunt:
2. Engineer/Rap.:
3. Type of Request:
4. Locatton
5. Extsttng Zontng:
6. SuPPounding Zontng:
7. Stt, Charactert;ttc;:
GlenFed Development Compan.v
Robert ktn, Wtlltlm Frost &
Associates
To change street and lot
configurations
South otr Rencho Caltfomta Road,
liest of Ynaz Road, and easterly of
1-15
$P
R-A-S, R-Z, SP
Vaunt, htlly tarratn covered wtth
sage scPub
8. Area Characteristics:
Itestdenttal eses extst to the
northeast and South; othen~tse,
wlclnt lind uses lairround ,.he stte.
10. Land Dtvlstonlku:
Seectftc Hen to. ZlO (Itancho
Highlands)
Tern1 kresge: Z8
lestdenttel Lets:
IHn. Lilt Stll: ~ Square feet
STAFF REPORT
S ectftc Plan 180
'~L~CT Change
Z2761/Ntnor
page 2
11. BecomeRenditions:
12. Letters:
13. Sphere of Influence:
Road: &he 13, 1989
Health: IVy 12, 1989
Flood: &he 7, 1989
Ftre: Iky I1, 1989
Land Use: lily 17, 1989
6radtng: July 20, 1989
hltrans: Iky 12, 1989
O~postng/Suppo~tng: None
Not wtthtn a ctty sphere
ANALYSIS
PPoJect Oescrtptton
fitnor change No. Z to Tentative Tract No. 22761 ts an application for a
11conft uratton of streets and adjoining lot layouts to Increase land use and
circulation efftcte
n
The stte ts located south of Itancho ClltfoPnta Road, mst of Ynez Road, and
cutefly of Interstate 15. At ~sent, tM p,Je~ st~ ts vacant.
h~ndfng land des tnclu~ mstly ~unt, ht11~ i~atn, ~th nstdentta~
usa ~ tM Iou~ I~ Hst. ~ ~t~ trodlately su~unds ~ st~ ~ ~e
~st end ~uth. To ~e m~ tl ~S, md ~ ~e ust ts R-1.
lACKGROUND
clftc Plan Jlo. IlO, lienthe HIghlands, its adopted bY the Jtherstde County
9er~ lw restdeer telo
cst, ogoP7 of l-6 dulic.
ktPommnU1 Milysts
· : I
STAFF REPORT
S ctftc Plan 180
'Tl~CT Change
22761/Minor
page 3
It should be noted that m geologic I~zm~d extsts on the stte: the Wtldomar
Fault, rated potentially active, cuts across the emster~ portion of the site.
The Fault end its associated SO-foot setback Mve been delineated per Oral nmnce
t
NO. 547.
FURTHER PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
The eastern portion of t~e site ascending from Ynez bad had m 3:1 (horizontal
to vertical) slope in the original tract mp and ms not anmlyzm~ due to its
flatter inclination. However, 1Is 2:1 slope tn the present conftgurmtion of
Minor Change No. I to Tract No. 22761 prompted m request by staff for m s~ope
t
analysis. As of th s writing, t~e sul~nttted slope analysis study needs to be
revised and again revtewed by the County Geologist. Staff ts wmtttng for m
clearance letter.
RECOI~ENDATION
COI~ItlAMCE of Minor Change No. I to Tentmttve Tract No. 22761.
FAB:gs:bm
MINOR CHANGE NO. 1
COMM.I COMM.
PLAZA
"COMM.
INDUS.'
VAC.
/
CONDOS
%,,,/
,COMM.,
'CENTER
~C~I'I~OLI
DIST. OFR
LAND USE
VACI
VAC.
RES.
SCHOOL
'- RES.
INDUST. COMM. RES.
· ' /
PARK SCATiIRED Te 227i= ,:
· DAy..,~RESIDENTIAL · ~
cA.E~.',~/</'~OMM.' .' ~ ' ?
,~ \ . . .",,,,/RES . _
~ VAC.
HILLY
VAC
/
jill,,
Ame RANCNO~ I,I)J:IMLlm
leG. Tal.,R./JW almeem'ee. mPe. U
9
ITR 22761
MINOR CHANGE NO. 1
EXI~T1NG ZONING
3
Re
RI
R-4
M-SC
,, R-A-5
. R-I
,-,...
0814 c: ~ ~ ...~,~_~",~'-'~,,/
Te la '::::;:--.., '.~, fi
R-A-20
/
-- kTJI..R.UW
8P
lOT A)m II'Rrr, KT R!CQeeIQURA"I'X3N
RANCHOGNJ"Q~kt~ lUl~Dim.,lm
~8
.,%.
--:-I
Zoning Area: Rancho California
Supervisorial District: First
Specific Plan Section
Minor Change for Tract No. 22761
Planning COnTniSSiOn: 7-26-89
Agenda Item No.: 6-1
RIVERSIDE COUMTT PL. AJglIIIG DEPAJ~lmE)IT
STAFF REPORT
Minor change No. 1 for Tract No. 22761 ts a lot and street reconfiguration.
Subsequent to the case being scheduled for Planning Commission, the County
Geologist and the Grading Section of Building and Safety requested more time
for review.
RECOI~ENDAT/ON
With the appltcant's concurrence, staff recor~nen~s continuance for four weeks
tO all cMw Sufficient review time. :
FAB: ban
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761
MINOR CHANGE NO. I
DATE: August 16, 1989
STANDARD CONDITIONS
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Tract No. 22761, Minor Change No. 1, which action is brought
about wi thin the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the
subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County:of
Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
pr~ptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the su~ivlder shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, the
indemnify, or hold harmless
County of Riverside.
e
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all h
t e requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative mmp will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460,
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance 460.
e
The sulxltvlder shall s~bmtt one copy of a sotls report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the I)mpartment of Building and
Safety. The re rt shall address the solls stability end ~eological
conditions of ~ slte.
6. if any grading ts proposed, tim subdivider shall sulmtt one print of
comprehensive gradlng plan to the Department of lutldtng and Safety. The
plan shall comply with the Unlform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 end as maybe additionally provided for tn these
conditions of appro el. v
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 2
4o
A grading perTnit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final flap.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement reconTnendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated June
19Bg, a copy of which is attached.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
flap boundary to a County maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
Continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final flap if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth tn the Riverside County Health Oepartment's
letter dated May 12, 1989, a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control Distrtct's letter dated
June 7, 1989, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies
within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of
Ordinance 460, appro riate fees for the construction of area dratnage
facilities shall be coVlectad by the had Cmmrlsstoner.
The subdivider shall comply
t
outlined in the County F re
which is attached.
with the ftre tBprovmmmnt recmndattons
Marshel's letter dated May 11, 1989, a copy of
The subdivider shall camply with the conditions set forth tn the
f nd attar date
Department of Building and Sa ety La Use Dtvtston's 1 d May 17,
1989, a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall ccmnply with the conditions set forth In the
Department of Buildtrig and Safety 6radtng Dtvtston's letter dated July
1989, e copy of which is attached.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 3
8.
The subdivider shall comply with Caltran's letter dated Hay 12, lg89, a
copy of which is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed camnon open space area
improvement phasin , if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Depar)ent approvaV. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
confom to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with the
provisions of Development Agreement No. 3 and Specific Plan No. 180.
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
a. All lots shall have a minimum size of 7200 square feet net.
b. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformante with $ectton
3.8C of Ordinance 460.
Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with
additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as
not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in
non-corner and through lots.
d. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the S.P. zone.
When lots are crossed by mJor public utility easements, each lot
shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet,
exclusive of the uttltty esmment,
f. 6raded but undeveloped land shall be mintmined in a wed-free
condition and shall be etther planted with interim landscaping or
rovtded with other eroston control measures as approved by the
~trector of Butldtng and Safety.
Prior to RECOROATXON of the ftnal mp the following conditions shall be
sattsfte~:
Prtor to the recordalton of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the RIverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined tn the attached approval
letters from the following agecotes have been mat.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761° Minor Change No. 1
Page 4
County Fire Deparment County Health Deparl=nent
County Flood Control County Planning DepartJnent
Building and Safety. Land Use and Grading Divisions
Celttans
b. The cammen open space Ires shall be shown as a numbered lot on the
final mmp end shall be mnaged by a mister property owners'
association,
c. A property awner's association wrlth the unqualified rtght to assess
the owners of the individual units for reasonable Ntntanance costs
shall be established and continuously mintained. The association
shall have the right to lien the property of the owners who default in
the payffwnt of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate
to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provided such deed
of trust is wade in good faith and for value and is of record prior to
the lien of the association. :
d, P,iew te ~eaawdatiem e~ the iiMa~ Inlp~ the subdividew iha~ annway ~e
f,eeaMd a~eaw ef a~ ~ienm, ~mnes, smseaaNnh leamem ~eae,ded and
unfeee~ded~ end easements, eatapt theme ententes w~ieh 4n the me~e
d4aewetien ef am Sewnay awe aassptablet Am aend4(ienm W~esedem( te
the Geunt~ leasiting title 4e leek ammah she awN4videw ahd~ submi~
the te~iewlnmj deanmania sk the P~annlng OeWaw,dMeni taw weviewl whisk
(Deleted by Planning Comasseen 8-16-89)
A lmmple desemet meMvey4q t4tle 4e ske puwakaaew e( am 4ndividual
4M eF emil wk4ak Immiw4dem Skit She dem;aweUen air moveninth
seediriseS aM mmmtfiatieea 4s 4e~ee,Wewalal annie by ~efewense.
(Deleted by Plmnntng Cmmntsston 8-16-B))
m, e4ew ek,mll 403 Imeew4de fee e le4,m el ie yemwh 41m.) pev4de tee, the
eeOblimlmmMmmi oir e ewly ownmesA eeaoelai4emm eoalmwiaed of She ownewe
IH, ev4e4es vewbal4e+ (Deleted bY Planning Coaurlssion 8-16-89)
The peepewi~ eweeFt4 eeaMiat4ee etUb44eked
mmeqeell eel She Go4ieI~y ldr 14Vlel4dlt amid lime
pepe;sy OWRIwSA
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, H'inor Change No. 1
Page 5
,Ue~ed kewete. ;be deeliter el fHu~we e~t4vittet e~ ,~e
be fi neteli d4ss~eltet ef Ue hetty ef Rtve~ttde, (Deleted by
Planning Cm~sston ~Z~89)
ewee44q lke assesseft ~4en. (Dele~d by Planntng Co~ss~on
8-16-89)
lUlIIIIIF-4R-4nIIFIII, A FFIHIId ledmR4 Ihl4~ be ilmi~dewed
zeo~ ee,~ (~le~ b7 Planning ~sston
e~;~a (hle~ b~ Planntng ~tsston ~Bg)
m~H. (ble~ bX Planntng Ca~sston ~1~89)
~tor ~ ~ratton of ~ fine1 su~vtston rap. ~
shall ~Mlt ~ fo11~tng &ann ~ ~e Planning bHr~nt
,vtw. ~tch ~umn~ sell M s~ect ~ ~ epp~vll ~
apa~nt nd ~ Office of ~ ~un~ ~nsel: (~ded b7 Planning
~sston
Z) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 6
2)
A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an
individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of
covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by
refe ran c e.
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for
review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provide
for the establisl~nent of a Vroperty owners' association comprised of the
owners Of each individual ot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the
COmmon area by either the property owners' association or the owners of
each individual lot or unit as tenants in camnon and (d) contain the
following provisions verbatim: (Added by Planningg Con~nission B-16-8g)
'Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary,
the following provision shall apply: (Added by Planning Commission
8-16-89)
The property owners' association established herein shall manage and
continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described
on Exhibit ' ' attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the
'cOmmon area', or any part thereof, ab.~ent the prior written consent
of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-in-interest. (Added by Planning Commission B-16-Bg}
The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the
owners Of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of
maintaining the 'cemmon area' and shall have the right to lien the
such o~mer w o
property of any h defaults in the payment of a
maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be
prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of
assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. (Added by
Planning Cmm~..tsston 8-16-89)
This Decllrltton shall not be terminated, 'subsClnttally' mended or
property aleannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the
Planntng Otrocter of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered
f
'substantial' if it efects the extent, usage or omtntenance of the
'Cammort area'. (Added by Planntng Cmmtsston &-16-89)
in the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles
of Zncorporatton, the Bylaws or the property meets' association Rules
end Itegulattons, tf any, thts I)eclaratton shall control." (Added by
Planning Coomdsston &-16-89)
Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions end restrictions
shall be recorded at the sam ttni that the ftnal nip ts recorded. (Added
by Planntng Cmmtsston 8-16-8g)
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Ntnor Change No. 1
Page 7
f9
The developer shall comply with ~e following parkway landscaping
conale tions:
1) Prior to the issuance of buildin permits, the developer shall
secure approval of proposed landscap?ng and trri atton plans from
the County Road and Planning Oeparl~ent. A~l landscaping and
irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a
reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County
Road DepartJnent.
z)
3)
The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall
be released concurrently with the release of subdivision
performance bonds, uaranteeing the viabiltty of all landscaping
which wtll be instaVled prior to the assumption of the maintenance
responsibility by the district.
The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest ~r
assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping
maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the
district.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and trri tton systema until such time as
those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved
by the Planning Director.
Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following:
1)
Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with
the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the
proposed street light layout first from the Road Deparl~ent's
traffic engineer and then free the appropriate utility purveyor.
2) Foil.wing approval o~ the street lighten layout by the Road
Depmriamnt's traffic engineer, the developer shill also file an
application with LAFCO for the fonnmtton of a street lighting
district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless
the sits ts withtn an extsttng ltghting district.
3)
Prior to recordslion of the Item1 map, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street lighttrig application from
LAFCO, unless the site is within an existtrig ltghtin9 district.
.,, .... ... ..oo. ,,o,.,.o .,, ~ .,. o.
electrical submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety for plan check approval end shell camply with the
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 8
requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 anO the
Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan.
he
Prior to recordatton of the final map, an Environmental Constraints
Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to
delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall
be transmitted to the Planning DeparlJnent for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final
map to the Planning I)eparl~ent and the Depar)ent of Building and
Safety.
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'County Geologic Report No. 199 & G.R. 199 (update) was
prepared for this property and is on file at the Riverside County
Planning Department. Specific items of concern in the report are as
follows: The following note shall be placed on the Environmental
Constraints sheet: 'Structure for human occupancy shall not 'be
allowed within the 50 foot setback associated with the Wildo~ar
Fa u 1 t."
A copy of the final map and Environmental Constraints sheet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department Engineering Geologist for review
and appoval.
ke
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Nount
Palmar Observatory.'
Prior to the recordatton of the final mp, the subdivider shall
provide a final geologic report for Planning Department approval· The
report shall be performed b nya geologist using standard
scientific methodology. ~ qualified
mitigation measures proposed shall be
incorporated tnto the design of the final lip and directed by the
Planntn Director. This report shall be ~te{I on an Environmental
ConstraVnts Sheeta wtttrevlr Itecessary,
County of
l
RIverside demonstrating comp tance wlth those conditions of approval
and Eltlgatton measures of thts mep end Envlrormntal Assessment Nos.
3Z943 and 3Z084 .htch EUSt be satisfied prtor to recorclatton of the
final mep, The Planntng Dtrector my requtre Inspection or other
mnttortng to assure such co. Fltance.
Prior to the tssuance of 6RADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 9
)tailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall
be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of
development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape
architect, and shall provide for the following: (Amended by Planning
Commission B-16-Bg)
Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation. (Amended by Planning
Commission 8-16-Bg)
Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque
up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. (Amended by
Planning Commission 8-16-B9)
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treal;nents, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed underground. (Amended by Planning Commission 8-16-89)'
Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area
of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth benr. ing,
ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with
meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenitief where
appropriate as approved by the Planning Department. (Amended by
Planning Commission 8-16-89)
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual thin project. (Amended by
e
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets end roJect parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they sha~l be planted outside of the road
1
right-of-way. (Mended by Plenntng Caaasston 8-16-89)
Landscaping plans shall tncor?orete nattve and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate. (Mended by Planning C4amisston
8-Z6-ag)
All existing specimen trees end significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shove on the proJect's grading plans
end shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
(Mended by Planntng Commission 8-16-89)
All trees shell be mdntmum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
rowing trees shall be steel staked. '(Mended by Planning
~m~ sston 8-16-89)
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 10
be
Ce
All approved gradin and butldtng
of post and beam ~ plans shall reflect the utilization
oundatlons or the appropriate combination of split
level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed
dis~nce of a
. ~tsston
8-16-89)
If the project ts to be phased, prtor to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline
for subsequent detatled grading plans for individual phases of
development and shall tnclude the following: (Amended by Planntng
Commission 8-16-89)
1. Techniques which wtll be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedtmentatfon durin~ and after the grading process. (Amended .by
Planning Con~nlsston -16-89)
z)
Approximate time frames for grad1 ~;~ identification of areas
which may be graded during the ~?g probability rain months of
~anuary through ~arch. (Amended by Planning Con~ntsston 8-Z6-89)
3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
Commission 8-16-89)
(Amended by Planning
4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
(Amended by Pllnntng Commission 8-16-8g)
Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent
t
grade. (Amended by Planntng Commsston 8-16-89)
Grading plans shall conform to hard adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut lad/or fill slopas, or Individual combinations
thereof, whlch exceed ton feet tn vertical hetght shall be modified by
in appropriate combination of a spactel ferriclag (benchang) plan,
increase slope ratio (l,e.t 3:1), retaining ~llls, and/or slope
planttrig combtried with Irrigation. All drivelays shall not exceed a
ftftaen pe~ent grade. (Amended by Plenntng Commatsston 8-I 89)
All cut slopes located adjacent to uegraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet tn verttcal hetght shall' be contour-graded
Incorporating the following gradtrig techniques: (Mended by Planntng
Comdsston 8-16-89)
1) The angle of the graded.slope shell be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terratn.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761. Htnor Change No. 1
Page ll
2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded forth shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
4) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
f. Natural features such as w~ter courses. specimen trees and significant
rock outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building
pads on final grading plans. (Amended by Planning Con~ission 8-16-E9}
g. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and th'at
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by
the Director of Building and Safety. (Amended by Planning Commission
B-16-89)
h. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist
shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the
proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact impact
to significant resources, a pro-grade meeting between the
paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be
arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall
have the authority to temorartly divert, rederect or halt grading
activity to allow recovery of fossils. (Amended by Planning
Commission 8-16-89)
t. Prior to the issuance of grading pemtts, a drainage study indicating
on- and off-site flow letterns end volumes, probable impacts, and
proposed mdtt rotton measures shall be prepared and shell be approved
by County ;iood Control Dtstrtct and Colttans. (/mended by Planntng
Comedsston 8-16.89)
4. All dwellings shell be located a minimum of ten fat from the top and
tops of ell slos over ten feet tn verttcal hot ht unless othervise
epproved by the P~mnntng Director. (Amended by ~lanntng Commission
8-16-89)
wherever . (Mended by Planning Co.etsston 6-16-89)
TEr(TATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 12
nt
All brow ditches, terrace drains and other minor swales where required
shall be lined with natural erosion control materials or concrete, as
approved by the Planning Director and Building and Safety. {Amended
by Planning Conm~ission 8-16-89)
Any 1report or export of materials shall be in accordance with County
Ordinances No. 457 and No. 565 respectively. (Amended by Planning
Con~nission 8-16-B9)
Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the subdivider shall prepare
and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of
Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval
and mitigation measures of this map and Environmental Assessment Nee.
31943 and 31084 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. The Planning Director may require inspection or other
monitoring tO assure such compliance. (Amended by Planning ConTnission
8-16-89) .
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERNITS the following Conditions shall
be satisfied:
ae
No building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any
residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's
successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public
facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100)
per lot/unit shall be deposited with the Riverside County Depar)ent
of Building and Safer as mitigation for c
(Amended by Planning Eomm salon publi library development.
t 8-16-89)
b. Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Buildin
and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acousttca~
subdivision ~ ~duce
tombtent tntertor noise levels to 45 CNEL and exterior noise levels to
65 CNEL. (Mended by Planning Commission 8-16-89)
Prior to the issuance of butldtng permits, comMasIre landscaping and
Irrigation plans shell be submitted for Planntng Deparllent approval.
The plans shell address all erems and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping end Irrigation to be installed Including, but not limited
to, parkway planttn , street trees, slope planting, led individual
front yard lendscapln9. (Mended by Planntng Cometsalon 8-16-89)
d. All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be
designed and constructed with fire retardant (Class A) roofs as
Ipproved by the Count~ Fire Mirahal. (Mended by Planntng Conmntsston
8- z 6-89 )
TENTATIVE TRACT NC. 22761° Htnor Change No. 1
Page 13
e. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other ener~ saving
devices shall be permitted with Planning I)eparl:nent approval.
(Amended by Planning Commission 8-16-89)
f. Buildin separation between all
not be Vess than ten (10) feet.
8-16-89)
buildings excluding fireplaces shall
(Amended by Planning Commission
g. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet.
(Amended by Planning Camnission 8-16-B9)
h. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic
irrigation. (Amended by Planning Commission B-16-89)
i. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the subdivider shall
prepare and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the
County of Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions ~f
approval and mitigation measures of this map and Environmental
Assessment Nos. 31943 and 31084 which must be satisfied prior to the
issuance of a building permit. The Planning Director may require
inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. (Amended by
Planning Commission 8-16-89)
J. Detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall
be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of
development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape
architect, and shall provide for the following: (Amended by Planning
Commission 8-16-89)
1. Permanent automatic irrigation systmms shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque
up to a mrlntmum height of six (6) feet at maturity.
3. All utility service artms and enclosures shall be screened from
landscapln and decorative barriers or baffle
view with as approved ~y the Planning Director. Utilities shall
treatments,
be placed underground.
4. Parksrays and landscepecl building setbacks shall he landscaped to
provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area
of the stto. Landscape elements shall tnclude earth bemtng,
ground covers shrubs end spectmmn trees tn conjunction with
meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amentries where
appropriate as approved by the Planntng Department.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Minor Change No. 1
Page 14
5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road
right-of-way.
7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
All extstlng specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shown on the proJect's grading plans
and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
9. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PE~ITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy pemits. If
seasonal conditions do not permit Vlanttng, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be uti zed as approved by the Planning
Director and the Director of Building and Safety.
be
Notwithstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study
is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
c. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in
accordance rlth the standards of Ordinance 461.
d. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision tn accordance
utah the standards of Ordinance 460.
Prior to the issuance of an occupanCy permit, the subdivider shall
prepare and submit · writ·an report to the Planntng Director of the
County Of Riverside demonstrmtlng cxmpltince ~th all mining
conditions of ·ppreval and mitigation mmasures of this amp and
Envlrommntal Assessment Nos. 31943 and 31084. The Planning Director
my requtre Inspection or other mmnttortng to assure such comFitante.
FB:mp
Riverside County Planning bpsrtsent
P&ge Tvo
October S, 1987
This certification shall be signed by 8 responsible
officiil of the wiSer company. Tbt,B SoI,IvlA_bt
This Department has a statement from the Rimthe California
Mater District agreeing to serve domestic Mater to each and
every ~ot in the lUbd~vil~on On demand providing
satisfactory financial strangeReats ire completed v~Lh the
subdivider. It v~ll be necessary for the financial
arrangements to.be made prior to the recordsLion or the
final asp,
This Department has s statement from the Astern
Mater D~strict agreeing to &lieu the lubd~vis~on serifs
system to be coursecLod to the levers of the District. The
sever system shill be instilled according to plans
specifications 6o spproved by the D~ltrict. the County
plans Of the sever system shell be submitted in triplicate.
&long vtth the origins1 drsving. to the CO~rnty Surveyor. The
prints ehsXZ ahoy the interns1 pipe dine&or, 1ocst~on
~d the silo st ~e severs It the ~cgi~ or the nov system
of sever lanes ~d water lines ohmS1 be & port&~ of the
swags pi~s ~d profx~es. ~e pl~s ehs~ be sig~ed by
ever lyekn ~ei~ ll~m of the ~ete~ ~$cipsl Mater
It fill be accesstry for %he finfacial irrsngesents ko be
aide prior to Use record&tim~ of the final asp.
SIal Ililll(r,r
P. O. IlOZ
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
WATER CONSERVATION OISTRICT
P1 Inntrig
have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nutsante nature local runoff which amy traverse porttons of the
property the project ts considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply wtth all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the irma consists of all defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There ts adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, 'All new
t of
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a man mum
18 inches above a~lcent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports.
This project ts tn the
dratnage plan fees shall Im paid in accordance with the applicable r~lesArea
and
regulations.
The proposed Zoning ts consistent wtth
fully develop to the
tEpl ted denstry.
The Dtstrtct's report dated Is still current for this pro~ect.
~/The Dtstrtct does mot abject to the proposed minor change.
Thts project Is a part ef . The project will be
stem ood hazard improvements kava ken constructed in
free of ordinary fi when
accordance v tab ;roved plans.
The attached cants eply.
7i t H .~~ ! r
or Civil Engtnom
GI.ENJ. ~
R.U CmEF
5-11-89
TIt 22761 - M'ZMOIt CH.4bNGE I 1
Pilaelal (s F.N'inerrir, I Ck~:ce
L,sl4m kreet. Suiee t t
Ihwti4k. CA 92S0t
("/14) 717,,6606
each respect t; the ~onditions of approval for the above referenced land division.
~e P~l h~lr~t re~B~s ~0 fol~ng f~r, p~tect~on measles be provided
in sccor~ce v~ Riveside ~ty Ord~ces ~d/or recognized f~re pro~ect~on
8~n~ds:
rill2: PROTECTZON
Schedule "A" fare protection aimproved standard fare hydrants (6"x4"x2J"), located
one at each street intersection and s~eced n~ m=re than 330 feet apart An any
direction, vi~h no l~mrtAon of any lot fmnUge ~re ~an 165 feet fr~ a hydrant.
~n~ fare rl~ s~ll h 1000 ~ for 2 ~rs ~ration at 20 PSX.
/q~licant/~evel~er shall fmAsh one copy of the water ayes=plans to the FAre
Depar:~ent for review. Pla~s ~all ~nfem to fare h~ant t~es, l~atAon and
~cinf, ~d, ~e ~st~ ~11 m~t ~e ram fiw r~ir~ents. Plans shall be
si~ed/~prov~ ~ a r~istered civil ~g~eer ud ~ l~al water ~anM v~th
~e ~oll~Ang ce~ifi~t~n, el ce~i~ ~at ~ desl~ of ~e water sy~em As
~ acmr~nce vi~ ~e ~rmnts pres~ ~ ~e ~versAde ~ty FAre
The required vase: system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and
accepted I~ the aWrWrAate water aeen~prAor t~ a~y emab~stibe b~Alding
maternal beAmS placed ms aa individual
Ltl ~i~t'~Js shall be oonstruetod with fare retardant roofing mterial a~
described in Section 3203 of the gallors DuAldAng Code. Any ~axMi shingles
or dMiMU dSall ]MBvO· Class ele IlLtag a~d skull be dillproved I~/t.bt PAre
I~Aoz to the roeordat~on of the IAnaX map, the dovelees: ehall ~it vi~ ~e
~v~sAde ~ 1~ ~t a mh m of M~-~ ~ ~/~t M mtigation
fan ~t~ ~~. ~d ~ ~~ ~m u b~ ~ ~ of
~t, b/~ my mt~ ~ a wit~ :t~,t M~t vi~ ~ ~y deferri~
~ ~nt U m m of ~~ of a ~~ ~t.
questions rogardAml ~bo seenLug of the conditions shall be referred to the
rL~e meS~tmnt ~XannAng and engineering ruff.
May 17, 1989
Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
liverside ~lLi~n~z}J~.y..PLann J~ar. tment
Attention: ellcii Irl'~lald MAY ~8}98~
County Adm strattve Center ..I~/Eii~ClXiNTy
4080 Lemon Street liI. ANNiN~ClipiirTi~NT
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Tract 22761 - Htnor Change tl
Ladies and 6entlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments Ind conditions:
Prior to the issuance of butlding permits, the developer shall
obtain Planntng Department approval for Ill on-site and off-
site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant
to Sectton 19.6 of Ordinance 348.
FIreplaces Bay encroach 1' into requtred minimum 5' side yard
setback.
Mechanical equipment Bay not be located tn required minimum 5'
side yard setback.
Site located in a Special Studies Zone -- G-199.
Developer Agreement e3 fees due prior to building permit
issuance.
Very truly yours, ,
Department of Building m~G Ear'dry
PLANkI tG
the o-~er o~ that ;ro~erty shall o~tai~ a
f~om the Departme-t of I~il~i-e a-~ Safety
NEXT
yar~t.
permit
O~d approval of the rough grading shall te obtaineel from
the Building and Safety Department.
Prior tO issuance of a~y building permit, the prODirty
o~ne~ shall obtain I grading permit end aDoroyal to
construct from the Building and la~ety Department.
Constructing a road, where greater tha~ 5l cubic yar~s or
material is placed Or moved, requires a grading pe-mit.
PriOr tO occupancy a~d/or indicting actual use
permit, a grading permit a~d approval of the gra~in~
te obtained from the Building a~d lafety Department.
Provide verlflcatio~ that the isisSing grading
permitted and approval to Construct eels ettateed from t~e
Building end lafety,
· he iradl~g lectlo~ had ~e r, om~ent In this site.
Iror the fi~al trediq plan - Please provide the applicable
ifrrOrekBtlO~ free rdlufitY Iredlq Worse IIk-lk
I1~-I 1
~k-Z
nay.
sse refer to the lollovinV cmen~s when ~u~mi~ing a grading
p..n for plan review by?he Grading Se~-~ion.
~1. Please refer to department fQr=s 284-86,284-120,284-21
end~lkd-46'fQr app1icable~nfQrma~ion to include ~n Meu:
· ~TadinV plans. ' ' ' ' w
X2, 4in ve~=~ .~=t~e follo lhg items
· Xn oz~ez tp Assus a .~:m V P ' ·
w 11 be ~eeded .at l~he p18m re is g - . .
a. '~~ a pl~ zeview p ~ · "
. Prmvide ~ .~p/es 'el ~e Prel~ha~ S~ils
~ep~.
Au. Prmvide a ~py ef ~e ~y~l~gic-h~ulic
Ad. Pr~[de glear~ce le~=srs
departS- ~ol ~V '
· cmn~i~i~ ef appeal on ~e appr~ve~ casej
~ ~. Provide ~ eresign cun~l plan,
a 1ic~e~ l~scape. ar~i~eC, f~r plan
review, peml=, and
~ 3. I~mi~ t c~pies of ~m ~ad~V p~an for dim=r~u=ion an~
Zeview.
Refer ~ an~ specific plu rela~ed ~ ~ls p~e~-
This prope~ As l~ca=ed An ~e hncho Calif~mia
Potential luhsidence area. ~er Ioaz~ lesolu~ion
additional Veote~hnical AnfQrmation As retired.
Obse~e slope se~ac~ l~m pe~ areas and
per se~ion ?01l ~d Zi~ 39-I of ~e UniZ;m luilding
Code as modified ~ Od~ce 4S7. ' .'. ' -
Driveway ~des all be D% or lee.' · ·
Ihov s~eet ~ pd elen~oM- '~e ~= a 1% ~de
DEPARTMENT OF TRANiPORTAI~ON
BAY 17B89
Deve3. olment P, ev:Lev
01-11.TV-3.5-4.13
Banohm l~ghlends
Attention Its./elicie Bradfield
County of Riverside
40S0 Idmon Street
Riverside, CA I2S0~
Dear Its. Bredfield:
Thank you for the oppo~nity to review the proposed Tentative
Trsc~ lap No. 2276l located southwesterly of Mancho California
Road Ind Ynez Road, e~st of X-IS In hn~o ~lifo~ia.
~lmase refer to the atUchmd Develolmsnt RoyJoy Form vhich
docunents Celttans* req~iressnts for this pro~oc~. Conformancs
vith ~sse conditions Is ~lr~ for lss~snce of an ~crosc~sn~
Zf RAy york is necessary within the mute highray right of ray,
the developer Rust obUintaencro~chuentpersit front he
Calftins Dlstrl~ I knit Office priortobogirming york.
Zf additional information is desired, please nil Sir. Thouas
levilie it (714) 313-4384,
Very tzl~y youzl,
District I~rsits Snginoer
August 14, 1989
UIIIAIITMINTAI, LITTIN
CODUNTY IDF FIIVER61DE
PLANNZNG DEPARTMENT
TO: Fellct a Bradfield -Spectftc Plans
FROM: Steve A. Kupfeman - Engineering Geologist
RE: TentatS ve Tract 22761
Slope Stability Report No. l& (update)
The following reports have been reviewed relative to slope stability at the
subject st tea
· 51 spa Stabt 1 tty Eva1 uatt on for the Proposed Rest dent1 el Oevel oi=ent,
Tentative Tract 22761, Rancho California, Riverside County, CA," by
Leighton mnd Associates, dated July 19, 1989.
2. "Response to County of RiversIda Reriew Letter," by Leighton and
Associates, dated August 9, 1989,
These reports cletemtned that:
1. The proposed ftll slope adjacent to Ynez Road rill be stable aga4nst
both deep-seated fatlure and surftctal fatlure.
2. The proposed ftll slope should be stable agatnst beth the deep-seated
and the surftctll slops fitlure under seismic cono~ttons.
These reports recmeended that:
1. The recmmendattons tncluded tn the General Earthark end Gradtng
Specifications (Appendix D) of the Let hton geotecMtcal report dated
June 16, 1969, should be Incorporated Tats ellstOn and construction.
2. M1 cut slolms should be observed by an engineering geologist during
greene.
Cut end ~11 slopes should be protided :dth Ipp rills surface
drsl nags features and 1 andscaped (wl th drought-~erant vegatat1 on ) as
soon as posstble after gridtrig to stntatze the potential for eroston.
Betas should be prodded st the top of fill sisIres, and brow d~tches
should be c~Rstructed It the top of cut slopes. Lot dratnage should be
directed such that suffice runoff on the slope face 11 minimized.
Felteta Bradfte3d - 2 - August 15, 1989
The other portton of ftll slopes should be e~ther overbuilt by 2 feet
(mtntm~) and trtmmed back to the ftn~shed slope or c~mpacted tn
tncr~ents of 5 feet (maximum) by a sheepsfoot roller as the ftll ts
placed and then trackwalked to echteve the ftnal configuration.
These reports sattsfy the lieneral Plan requireerie for a slope stability
report. The recamendattons made tn these reports shall be adhered to tn the
destgn and construction of thls pro;lect.
$AK:el
OItFIC~ OF eOAD COMM~ONER & COUNTY
June Z3, Z989
I'.0 I:)x
(?14) 71.74,LS4
Riverside County Planning
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 9250Z
Commission
Tract NIp 22762
fitnor Ch/nge IX
Schedule A - Team SP
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the re,treAted tentative
land division map, the Road Department teemends that the ~anddividet
provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement
Standards (Ordinance 461), It is understood that the tentative sap
correctly shows acceptable ~entarl~ne pro~iles, ell existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and thac their
Omission or unacceptabllity my require the up to be teen=milled
further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are
essential parts and a requirement occurring ~n ONE is as binding as
though occ~rring in alZ. they are intended to be c~mplementary and to
describe the tendinane for a c~Zoto design oZ the improvement.
~estions reeardLnq the true maninS of the c=nd~tiens shall be re[erred
to the Road C=lssioner*s
The landdivider shall protect downsCreme properties ~rom
damages caused b alteration of the drainage patterns,
i,e., concentration of diversion of floe. protection
shell be provided by ~onstructing adequate drainage
facilities laeludine enlarging existin fscllities and/
or t~ eeari s drslmee easeout. ~X drsl~ee
ossmnts s~X m m on the fill mp end noted ss
or en~rmc~nts by bud fllXs : eastfactions
, ~e
pratetaLe sMll k u s~re~ by the ~d h~rtsent,
3. ~ae landdivider shall accept and proearly dispose of
all offsite drainage fleeing onto or tarough tam site.
Xn the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of
· streets for drainage reason, the provisions of Article
ZX of OrdlMn~e So. 4~0 will apply. leoaid the
quantities esmd the street upscity or the use of
streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider shall pro~ide adequate drainage facilities
as epproved Irr the Road Departsent.
Zract I~p 22761 - lit nor Change
June 13, 1989
Page 2
Major drainage Is involved on this landdivision and i~s
resolution shall be ms approved by the Road Departmenc.
· As and "C" 8treats shall be Liproved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with County ltandard No. 104,
Section &. (40'/60')
"D" ltreet shall be improved within the dedicated right of
way in accordance with County Standard No. 10S, Section A.
(36*/60*)
Proace Lane and "Be Street shall be improved with 34 fee~
Of asphalt concrete pavement viaAim a 45 foot part width
dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard
as. 103, Section k. (22'/33')
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and
401 (curb sidewalks).
¥nez Road (northerly of Rancho Vista Road) shall be
improved with concrete curb and gutter located 3S fee~ from
centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving:
reconstruction~ or rosatracing of existing paving as
determined by the Road Commissioner within a S0 foo~ hale
width dedicated right of way in accordance eith County
Standard ~. 101.
Ynez Road (southerly of lancho Vista Road) shall be
improved with concrete curb and gutter located 32 feet from
centerline and match u asphalt soncrete paving:
reconstructloaf or resur~scing of existing paving ms
determined by the load Commissioner within a 44 foot half
width dadleered ·ight of way in ascordance with County
Itandard Is, 102,
a seconderr access road to the nearest paved ·end
maintained by the County shall be const·ucted within the
blic fight Of way in m~mordan~e with County Itandard B~.
~006, Section B, (S~'/S0*) st · g·ade and exigent as
· roved by the Road Commissioner, ~ls is necessary for
o~Prrcolstionpurposes.
paler to the recordstim of the final mp, the developer
sisIX deposit eith the Riverside Count Road De rtsent, ·
sash sun of lie0,00 · lot as sit[garish ~sor trsff c
Count defer·Rag said payment to the ties of issuance of s
buil~[ng persia.
Tract l~p 2276Z - Nlnor Change
~jne 13, 1989
P~ge 3
Improvement plans sl~aZl be based u~on s centerZinc P:=fiZe
extending s minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
River·ida County S~d Cmmissioner. Completion of
road improveants d~s not ~Zy acceptance for min-
te~nce by ~g~ty,
Ilectrical and co~unicstions trenches ·hall be provided in
accordance vith Ordinance 461, Itandard 817,
Aspbaltic emulsion (fc~ seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0,05 gallon per
square yard. asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throuVhou~ the
landdivision.
Corner Cutbacks in conferlance vith County Standard No. 805
shall be shorn on the final map and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on ¥nez Road and so noted on
the final sap.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance
control and slope easements as approved by the Road
Department.
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho
California Hater District prior to the recozdation of the
final sap.
The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as
approved by tile Road DepartBent.
ne tintsus lot frontages along tee knuckles shall be 35
let.
All drlvewa · shall ~onforstotAe applicsbleliverside
Count7 It~rda,
· be tinimm earsgo setback shall be 30 feet measured from
the fa~e of seth,
All oenterlim interso~tioas stmll be at 90° visa · Binmum
S0' tangent seaBared froR floe line or as approved by the
Road Commissioner.
TracCJxlap 22761 -Mtnov' Change
,.~.ne ~3, 1989
Plge 4
25.
The s~ree~ dtsign and improvement concept o~ this projec~
shal~ be coordinated vi~h GP ~80, Pm 22?08, TR 22204° TR
2~760 and Tit 227~2.
Very truly yours,
County of Riverside
O: LTV'EUZ. D~: CO'I~TTY PLANNING DEPT.
DAT~: May 12. 1989
KEA.LTH SPECZ.A.LIST I1'
TIACT IdJkP 22761, IENOR CRANGE ~ I
rmvtxmental ~salth Services has raytoyed Kinor Chants No.
May S, 1989 . Our current easels FLLt remain as stated
in our letter dated tctoberd,,987.
JM:tac
I dated
MAY 15 bll} ~
OCT 0 5
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon It. p RIVERS~DECO~
I~tvoreide. CA 92501 I-ANhiING DEP~
~l:; T!ti. ACT liAP J2761: Being · subdivision of · portion or
Lots l, J, · · 8 Block 18 and t portion Df Lots I & 15 Block
3g of Ptub& Lind &rid Utter Co, as shown by Map filed in Book
II, P·ge gO? 9f Maps, Records of San Diego County
(80 Lots)
Gent. lemon:
The Depsrtment of Public HeslLh has reviewed Tent.st.ire Ms~
~0,.~761 sad recoeondl thst.:
A ester syst.om shill be instilled ·ccording to
plans end specifics·ion ·s ·pproved by the ester
compa-~y and the Xeslth DeFeraRena. PoresneAt
prints of the pleas st the ester system shill
be submitted tn tripligste. vtth· minimum stile
not lees thin one inch equsl, 200 feet. ·long vZth
the original dr,vine to the County Iurveyor. The
prints shall show the interns1 pipe disaster.
lee,·ton Of valves sad fire hydra·re; pipe
3sin· specific&Lion,. mad the size of the akin
st the 3unction of the new eye·e· to the
&IA respects with Die. I, Part i, Chipfor Y of
the hASternS· Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code. Title 3~. Chip·mr 16. sad 6ener,l
Order Ms. i0l et the Public Utilities Commission st the
Irate ot hiltomit,when &pplies%le. he pALes shill
be oilnod By, registered engineer sad uter goBpiny
with tho..tolloving sertificttien: °! certify thst the
doeSin of the ester system in Tract imp lJ761
,seerdance with the water system osqssneion plans of the
Jimthe hAStemS, eater District and tb, t the ester
servSee, egorage sad distribution system viii
Adequate to provide water setvise to such tract.
his mortification does mot sonsliters · guarantee that
it viII supply water to such tract at any specific
QuartrAtios, taws or pressures for fire protection or
any other purpose".
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Extension of Time, Tentative Tract No. 22761
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
{ Traffic Mitigation )
Public Facility
Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Public Facility
~ Library )
Fire Protection
Flood Control
tADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 1
Condition No. 2
Condition No. 12
Condition No. County
Road No. 11
Condition No. 3
Condition No. Letter
dated 5/11/89
Condition No.
County Planning No. 1~
M9/Plannin9
ITEM NO. 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
C I TY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 30, 1990
First Extension of Time
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762
PREPARED BY:
R ECOMMEN DAT ION:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCAT ION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Richard Ayala
Receive and File
Coleman Homes
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Fifty (50) lot residential subdivision of 16.86 acres.
First Extension of Time.
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road,
west of Ynez Road.
Specific Plan 180 (Rancho Highlands)
North: R-A-5
South: SP 180
East: R - 1
West: I - 15
ResidentialAgricultural,
acre minimum)
Rancho Highlands)
One-Family Dwellings)
Interstate 15 )
Not requested.
Vacant
STAFFR PT\TM22762 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Multiple Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
)-15
Total Acreage:
No. of Lots:
Open Space Lots:
Proposed DU/Acre
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
16.86
50
1
3.1
7,200 sq. ft.
BACKGROUND:
First Extension of Time application for Tentative
Tract Map No. 22762 was submitted to the City on
July 6, 1990. On October 1, 1990, it was presented
to the City of Temecula Plannin9 Commission and
was approved by a 3-0 vote based on the analysis
and findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached changes to the Conditions of
Approval per the request of the Planning
Commission. This project was approved by the
Planning commission prior to adoption of Ordinance
90-19 which gives final approval authority to the
Plannin9 Commission for this type project.
Therefore, this case is being forwarded to the City
Council as a Receive and File item as required prior
to adoption of Ordinance 90-19.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Department Staff recommends that the City
Council:
RECEIVE AND FILE the First Extension of
Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 22762,
based on the analysis and Findings contained
in the Report and subject to the attached
amended Conditions of Approval.
RA:ks
Attachment:
Planning Commission Staff Report
dated October 1, 1990, including
all attachments
STAFF R PT\TM22762 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee sat forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution. (Amended per Planning Commission October 1,
1990. )
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Sectiol~
10.35 of Ordinance No. 460 has been previously satisfied or an agreement with
CSA 143 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land
divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in
accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. ~60. The agreement shall be
approved by the City Council prior to the recordation of the final map.
[Amended per Planning Commission October 1, 1990. )
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential IotJ unit
within the project boundary until the developer's successorbs-in-interest
provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A
cash sum of one-hundred dollars I$100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with
the City as mitigation for public library devetoprnent.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be cornplated at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further considera[ion.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
STAFF R PT\TM22762 1
5. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-d-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineeras Office,
in addition to any other permits required.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a precise grading plan to tl~e
Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer. I Amended per Planning Commission October 1, 1990. )
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
10.
11.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
12.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declarul. ion for the
project, in the amount in affect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
STAFFRPT\TM22762 2
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to p~=oLest
such increase.
STAFFRPT\TM22762 3
AYES '. 4 C{)MM [ SS lONERS:
NOES: 0
CO~4M[SSTONERS: None
COMMISSIONERS: Hoaqlano
i.O. 'T'w, Nq'Aq'IVE MAP NO. ~P761, EXTENSION OF TIME and
]'l. 'PENTA't'IVE MAP NO. PY76?, EXTENSION OF TIME
Pr].or to nearing thi~ item, COMMISSIONER CRINIAEFF stepped down
~u~ to a confiict of interest aD~ turned the gave] over to Vice
Chai. rman COMMISSIONER FORD.
J O. '{
Proposal for first extension of t~m~ on project ]ocatecl
,~out. h o~ Rancoo Cai.~.fornia Road, west of Ynez Road and
easterly of I--35.
PrOPOSal for first extension of time on project located
south of Rancid Cakl. forn].a Road, west of Ynez Road and
easterj Y of I-[{ 5.
RICHARD AYAI.A Drov3dert the staff report on th]s item.
COMMISSIONKR FORD guesti. oned i.f the applicant was part
nf a ~veloPment a~reement. The applicant confirmed
that they dj.d ~ave a devetnpment agreement.
RTC~ARD KLA,.qSEN, Co]eman Homes, 42850 Agena Street,
m~mecul. a, reQue.~ted c[arj. f. ication nf the following
COD~]t]OD,q Of APprOVa.l: No, :l, Mr, K.lassen state~
that the site has at. ready been ~raded; t.h~r~fore, the
SKR fee~ have been satisfied; No. 2, Mr. K]as~en
questioned Dark and recreation fees. G~Y THORNHII,L
stated that they wnu]d satisfy th~ requirement under
the devetoDment agreement; therefore, the Condition
shouJd read "pay the fee or satisfy toe the County
requirement". Mr. Kiassen also requested that Condition
No. 8 be modified to r~ad "precise gradjog plan".
COMMISSIONER FAIIEY moved to approve the First
Extension of T~me and to approve Tentative Tract
Map No. 22761, Minor Change No. 1, subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval amended as fo]]ows:
RIM. 10/1t 90 -13- 10/10/90
.~[.ANN f IVfl. C()MM] SS]'f)N ~4TN|]'f'RS 0C'7'(')RER; , ] ~qO
Conditlnn No. I te read "unt. es.~ previously Paid":
"~r~or to ~ll~Jd]nq Derm~t", ~onded by COHNISSTONRR
RT.AIR and carri.~d as tol. kows:
AYES: 3
COMMISSIONERS:
R) a1 r, Fa~ey, Ford
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
ARSmATN: :{ COMMJSSJONERS: Ch~n~aeff
ABSENT: L COMMISSIONERS: Hoag[and
COMMISSIONER FABEY mnve~ to anDrove the First
Extension of T].me and to approve Tentative Tract Map
No. 77762, subject to toe attached Conditions of
Approval amended as foLl, ow~: Condi, ti. on No. ). to read
"unless prev~nus)y paid": No. 2 to indicate e]ther the
r~au]rement ha~ be~n ~at].~fied or the fees are naid;
an~ No. 8 to rea~ "Dr3Or tO bll].ld]DQ Perm3t", ~ecoDded
by COMMISSIONER St,AIR and carrqed as fnli. ows:
AYES: 3
COMM 1 SSIONERS:
B) a] r, Faney, ForO
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
ARSmATN: .{ COMMISSIONERS: Chjnjaeff
ABSENT: I. COMMISSIONERS: Hoagkand
COMMISSIONER CBINIAEFF returned to the chair.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
GARY THORNHILL advised the Commission that City Manager, David
Dixon would be present at the October 15, 1990, Planning Commission
meeting to provide them with an update on the status of the General
Plan. Mr. Thornhill also directed the Commission to choose two
indiv~dua]s to participate ~n the selection of the Genera] Plan
consultant. COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND and COMMISSIONER FORD were
e.iected with COMMISSIONER BLAIR as an alternate.
MIM. 10/1/90 -14- 10/10/90
Case No.:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 1, 1990
First Extension of Time
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762
Prepared By: Richard Ayala
Recommendation: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCAT ION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Coleman Homes
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Fifty ( 50 ) lot residential subdivision of 16.86 acres.
First Extension of Time.
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road,
west of Ynez Road.
Specific Plan 180 (Rancho Highlands)
North: R-A-5
South: SP 180
East: R-1
West: I - 15
ResidentialAgricultural,
acre minimum)
Rancho Highlands)
One-Family Dwellings)
Interstate 15 )
Not requested.
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Multiple Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
1-15
Total Acreage:
No. of Lots:
Open Space Lots:
Proposed DU / Acre
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
16.86
50
1
3.1
7,200 sq.ft-
STAFFRPT\TM22762 1
ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
Specific Plan No. 180, Rancho Highlands, was
adopted by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on June 5, lcj84. Amendment No. 1 to
this specific plan, Change of Zone No. 5105, and
Tract No. 22761 were adopted by the Board on July
18, 1988. The Amendment switched Planning Area
No. 12 J Tract No. 22762 ) from the medium
residential category of 4-10 DU/AC to the low
residential density category of 2-5 DU/AC.
Tract Map No. 22762 is a proposal to subdivide
approximately 16.86 acres into fifty (50) single
family residential lots with a minimum lot size of
7,200 square feet. The subject site is located south
of Rancho California Road, west of Ynez Road and
easterly of 1-15.
Desiqn Considerations
The proposed subdivision has been designed i~
accordance with the standards of Ordinance Nos.
348, 460 and Specific Plan No. 180. The main access
to the project is Tetra Vista Road. The project has
been designed to provide increase land use and
circulation efficiency.
Density
The proposed subdivision J Tract No. 22762 )
according to Specific Plan 180, requires proposed
subdivisions to range from 2-5 DU/AC. The
proposed subdivision consists of 3.1 DU/AC.
Thus, meeting Specific Plan No. 180 density
requirement for residential development.
The proposed density of 3.1 units per acre is
consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan.
In addition, Staff finds it probable that this project
will be consistent with the new General Plan when it
is adopted.
ST A FF R PT\TM22762 2
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
On July 18, 1988, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors adopted a Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment Nos. 31943 and 31084 to
be applied to Tract Nos. 22761, 22762, and 21760,
Amended No. 2, at which time determined that the
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract No.
22762 will mitigate any environmental concerns·
There is a reasonable probability that
Tentative Tract No. 22762 will be consistent
with the City's future General Plan, which
will be completed within a reasonable time in
accordance with State Law.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted General Plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the circulation
patterns, access, and density.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare.
Tentative Tract No. 22762 is compatible with
surrounding land uses. The harmony in
scale, bulk, height, density, and coverage is
likely to create a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties.
The proposal will not have an adverse affect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Initial
Study for this project.
STAFFRPT\TM22762 3
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with this application are herein
incorporated by reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Plannin9 Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
APPROVE Tentative Tract Map No. 22762,
based on the analysis and findings contained
in the Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
RA:ks
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
STAFFRPT\TM22762 ~
Location Map
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance· Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with CSA
1~3 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land divider has
provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with
Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. L~60. The agreement shall be approved by the
City Council prior to the recordation of the final map.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit
within the project boundary until the developePs successoPs-in-interest
provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A
cash sum of one-hundred dollars {$100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with
the City as mitigation for public library development·
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
5. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
'STAFFRPT\TM22762
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise·
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-d-way, fees shall be and
an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval· The plan shall be drawn on 21¥' x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
10.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
11.
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
12.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assumin9 benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
STA F F R PT\TM22762
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PL.A, NNIHG DEPARTI(NT
SLTBDIVISION
C~NDITIONS OF APPROVAJ,
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22762
DATE: 5-25-88
EXPZRES:
STAh'I)ARO D)~I)ITIONS
·
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees*to attack,* set aside, mid, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal beards or legislative bedy
concerning Tract No. 22?62, which action* is brought abeut within the time
period provided for in California Goverrenent Code Section 66499.37. The
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
fully In the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the
subdivider of any such clatm, motion, or proceeding or fails to cooperate
fully tn the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible
to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside.
2. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision IMp Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A. unless modified by the conditions listed below.
3. This Conditionally approved* tentative.map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of SuperviSors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
4. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision IMP Act and
Ordinance 460.
S. The subdivider shall submtt one copy of m sotls report to the Riverside
County Surveyor'l Office and two coptea to the Department of Building and
Safety. The report shall address the sotls stability and geological
conditions of the site.
Zf any grading ts proposed, the ~ubdtvtder shall submit one print of
6. comprehensive rading plan to tie Deportmeat ef kllding and SafetY. The
plan shall cm~y vith the Unitore ktldteg Code, Chapter 10 ms amended
by OrdtMnce 4S7 end as amybe additionally provided ;or in these
conditions of approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page Z
7. A grading permit shell be obtained from the Department of Building and
t
Safety prior to cemncement of any grading outside of county ma ntatned
road right of way.
8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordration of the
final map.
e
The subdlvider shell comply with the street improvement recmndattons
outlined in the Riverside County Road Depmrt~mnt's letter dated 11-13-87
copy of which ls attached.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460. shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to e County maintained reid.
all road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shell be free from all encumbrances ms rapproved
by the Road Comtsstoner. Street nines shell be subSect to mpproval of
the Road Conntsstoner.
12. Easements, when required for romdwmy slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they mre locate~
within the lmnd dtvtston boundmry. All offers of dedication mn
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded ms directed by the County
Surveyor.
13. Water mnd sewerage disposal fmctltttes shall be installed in mccordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter dated 10-5-87 m copy of which is mttached.
14. The subdhtder shall comply with the flood control recon~nendattons
outltned by the RIverside County Flood Control Oistrtct's letter dated
In
·
460, epproprtete fees fir the construction of ere. drain.go facilities
shall be collected by t~e RomdCemtssloner-
15. The subdivider shall comply with the fire tmprovee~nt ricoemendations
out]fried tn the County Fire Hmrshml's letter dmted 10-6-87 m copy of which
is attached.
16. The subdivider shell comply with the recoemnendmttons outlined in the
Caltrmns letter dated 10-20-87, a copy of which is attached.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 3
vehicular access to ell lots In each phase, and shall substantially
confom to the tntent and purpose of the subdhtston approval,
Lots'created by this subdtv¶ston shall.comply vtth the following:
I. A11 lots shall have e tintmum sfze Of 7200 square feet net.
b. M1 lot: length to vldth.rstlos shall..be tn conromance vlth hctton
3.8COl OrdinAnce 460.
c. Cotter lots end through lots, tf any, shall be provtded vlth
additional ares pursuant to Section 3.8B of Ordinance 460 And so as
not to contain less net area than the least mount of net area in
non-corner And throdgh lots. ..
d. Lots created by thts subdhtsfon shall be tn conromance ~th the
development standards of the $.P. zone.
e. Vhen lots are crossed by major publlc uttlltyeaseme~ts, each lot
shell have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet,
exclusive of the utility easement,
f. Graded but undeveloped land shall be mtntatned tn a ~eed-free
condition and shall be etaher planted vtth interim landscaping' or
provided wtth other' eroston control measures as approved by the
Director of ~u41dfng and $afety~:
The subdlvider shell comply vtth the Wancho Hater District recocrendations
dated 10-6-87, · copy of vhtch ts attached.
Prtor to RECORDATTON of the final map the folioring conditions shall be
sAttsf¶ed:
Prior to the recordaaron of the ftn·l mp the applicant shell subeta
vrttten clearances to the liverside County had and Survey Department
that ·11 pertinent requirements outltned tn the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met.
County F(re Depa~tzet
County flood Control
County Ikalth Delartment
Count~ Planning DepArtmat
Prior to the recordAlton oft he final mp, Change of Zone No. S10S-
shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective.
Lots create by thts lind dhtston shall be tn conformante v tab the
development standards of the zone Mittitaly Applied to the property-
Condtt4ons of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 4
dQ
The cew~on open space area shall be sho~m as a numbered lot on the
ftnal mp Im:l shall be Banaged by e master property ovners
essodatton.
A master property mmePs association or appropriate publlc maintenance
agency shall be established by the developer encompassing the entire
specific plan, for the ovmer~h(p, maintenance and management of the
natural open space, and a11 cem~non open space lots landscaping and
tPrt eaton systems along publlc r~ads, ma;Jor pro;lect entry potnt
facilities, stgntng end 11ghtlng as necessary as defined through the
spectftc plan and conditions of approval.
A property owner's association ~th the unqualified rtght to assess
the ovmers of the Individual untts for reasonable mtntenance costs
shall be established and continuously maintained. The association
shall have the right to lien the property of the ovmers who default, In
the payment of their assessments. Such lhn shall not be subordinate
to any encuff~rance other than a first deed of t~ust provided such deed
of t~ust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to
the l ten of the association.
Prior to recordeaton of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall
Sut~ntt to the Planning Department the follo~ng documents for County
approval ~htch shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Department
that the total project rill be developed and maintained tn accordance
with the Intent and purpose of the approval.
1) The document to convey title
2) Covenants, codes and restrictions to be recorded
3) Panagement end maintenance agreement to be entered Into with the
unttJlot owners of the pr~lect,
The approvod documents shall be recoPdod it the sme ttme that the
subdivision map Is recorded. Sitd documents shall contatn provisions
for ownership or the Irrevocable right to use the open space and
tmenftles by the o~ers of the FoJect. The approved documents shall
also contatn: provtslon vhtci provtdes that the CC & R's my not be
terminated, or substantially amended vtthout the consent of the County
or tts seccessor-ln-interest.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Peg e 5
g. The developer shall coeply vtth the h11wtng parkray landscaping
condt tlons:
t)
Prior to the lssuance of butldtng pemtts, the developer shall
secure appreval of proposed landscaping end irrigation plans from
the'County Road and Planning Departaent. All lendscaptn end
Irrigation plans end spectffcettons shall be prepared Tn a
reproducible format suttable for permanent tiltrig ~th the County
Road Department.
2)
The developer shall post a landscape performance bond ~htch shall
be released concurrently w~th the release of su~tv~ston
perromance bonds, guarAnteefng the vtabtltty of all landscaping
which wtll be Installed prtor to the assumption of the matntenA,ce
responsibility by the d(strtct.
3)
The developer, the developer's successors-In-Interest or
assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping
maintenance unt(1 such t(me as maintenance ts taken over by the
district.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenAnce end upkeep of
slopes, landscaped areas end irrigation system unttl such time
those operations ere the responstbt1(tles of other parttes as Approved
by the Planning DIrector.
Street 1(ghts shell be provtded v4thtn the subdivision 4n accordance
~tth the standards of Ordinance 462 end the folioring:
l)
Concurrentlyv~th the ftltng of subdivision Improvement plans vlth
the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the
proposed street 11ght layout first frm the Road Depart~ent's
tr&fftc trigthief Ind then from the appropriate uttltty IxJrve.Wr.
2) Follawtng approval of the street 11ghttn layout by the RoAd
Department'S traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an
application vith LAFCO for the tornalton of I street lighting
1
dhtrtct, or leeexit on to an extsttng 11ghttng district, unless
the stte ts ~lthtn an existtrig lighttrig district.
3) Prtor to ~ecorditton of the final map, the developer shall secure
condtt¶onal approve1 of the street lighting application from
LAFCO, unless the stte ts within in existtrig 11ghttng district.
Prior to recordeaton of the ftnal map, an Environmental ConstrAInts
Sheet (EC$) shall be prepared tn conjunction vtth the ftnal map to
delineate identified environmental concerns end shall be perTanently
Condltlons of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 6
ftled with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall
be transmitted to the Planning Oeparl~nent for revte~ and approval.
The appPoved ECS shall be forvaPded with coptes of the recorded final
mp to the Planntng Department and the Department of Butldtng an~
Safety.
The follwlng note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: "County Geologtc Report No. Zgg & G.R. No. Z99 (update) yes
Frepared for this property and ts on ftle at the Riverside County
Planntng Department.
The follwtng note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: "This property ts located within thirty (30) atlas of Hount
Palomar Observatory. All proposed ~utdoor lighttrig systems shall
comply with the California Znstttute of Technology, Palomar
Observatory recommendations dated t0-6-87 a copy of vhtch is attached.
Prtor to the tssuance of GRADING PERHITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the lssuance of grading pemtts detatled connon open space
area landscaplng and Irrigation plans shall be subnttted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of develoi~ent in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provtde
for the following.
Permanent automatic Irrigation systems shall be Installed on 811
landscaped areas requiHng irrigation.
2. Landscape screening where required shall be destgned to be opaque
up to I mtntaum hetght of stx (6) feet at maturity.
All uttllty servtce areas end enclosures shall be screened frm
vtev with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treebashes, as Ipproved by the Pllnntng DIrector. Utilities shall
be placed underground.
Parbays and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide vlfaal screening or a transition tnto the prtmary use area
of the stte. Landscape elements shall tnclude earth .bemtng,
ground cover, shrubs and spectmn trees In conjunction with
meanderTog sideelks, benches and other pedestrian amentails ~here
Ipproprtlte Is liproved by the Planntng Departache,
Landscaping plans shall Incorporate the use of spedmen accent
trees at key visual focal potnee within the project.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 7
Viper, street trees cannot be
tntertor streets end project
rtght-of-~ay, they shall be
· rt ght-of-tmy.
planted utthtn right-of-way of
parkways due to Insufficient road
planted outstde of the road
7. Landscaping plans shall Incorporate natty. and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
8. All extsting spedmen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shovm on the proJect's gradlag plans
and she1'1 note those to be removed,.relocated and/or retained.
9. All trees shall be a4ntmum double staked.
grow4ng trees shall be steel staked.
Meaker and/or slow
be
Prtor to the tssuance of gradtag permtts, a dratnage study tndtclttng
on-and off stte flow patterns and volumes, probable tmpacts, and
proposed mitigation measures shall be prepared and shall be approved
Ca arias.
by County Rood Control Dtstrtct and 1
de
M1 approved grad(ng and bu41dtng plans shall reflect the utilization
of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split
level pads and post and beam foundations when development ts proposed
on slopes of fifteen percent or greater measured over a horizontal
dtstance of thtrty (30) feet.
If the project ts to'be phased, 'prtor to the approval of grad4ng
permttS, an overall conceptual 9radln plan shall be sulx~(tted to the
Planntng Dlrector for approval. The ~an shall be used as a guideline
for subsequent detailed gradtag Tans for tndlvtdual phases of
davelord,at and shall tnclude the foTlawtng:
1. Techniques ~htch .111 be uttltzed to prevent eroston
sedlmentatton durtng and after the gradtag process.
and
2) Approximate time frames for redlag and Identification of areas
vhlchmey be graded durtng the ~lgher probability rata months of
aanuary through ~rch
3) PrelSmtnir~ pad and roadway elevations
4) Aroas of temporary gradTag outside of · particular phase
e. t)rtveways shall be destgned so as not to exceed a ftfteen (15) percent
grade.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 8
Grmdtng pla~s shall conform to Bomrd adopted Hillstde Develoment
Standards: All cut and/or f111 slopes, or Individual combinations
thereof. vhtch exceed ten feet In verttcal hetght shall be ~dtfted by
· n appropriate combination of · spectll terracing (benchlng) plan,
1norease slope ratio (t.e., 3at), retaining walls, and/or slope
planting cembtned w4th irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a
fifteen percent grade.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terratn and
exceeding ten (t0) feet tn verttcal hetght shall be contour-graded
Incorporating the follow4ng grading techniques:
l) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually ad3usted to the
· ngle of the natural terratn.
2) Angular form shall be discouraged. The graded fore shall reflect
the natural rounded tetra1·.
3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded ~tth curves wtth
rad~! destgned In proportion to the total hetght of the slopes
bhere dratnage and stability pemtt such rounding.
4)
lib,re cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet tn horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved tn a continuous,
undulat(ng lash(on.
he
Natural features such as rarer courses. spectmen trees and s~gn~ftcant
rock outcrops shall be protected tn the stttng of Individual butld(ng
pads on final gradtng plans.
Prtor to the tssu·nce of grad(rig permtts, the developer shall prov4de
evtdence to the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety that all ad4acent
off-s(temlnufactured slopes have recorded slope easenents and that
SlOpe maintenance respons(btl(t(es have bean ·sslgned as ·pproved by
the Director of Building and Safety.
Prtor to the Issuance of gradlng pemtts, · qualified paleontologist
shall be rata¶ned by the develol~r for consulration and comment on the
rol~sed gradtrig ~tth respect to patent1·1 paleontologtcal 'Impacts.
Should the paleonteloglst find the potential ts htgh for tmpact tmpact
to significant resources, · I~t-grsde mettng between the
1
palemetolqtst eml tim excavation end gradtrig contractor she1 be
arranged, 1dhen necessity, the paleontologlst or represent·the shall
have the authority to tmporarfly dtvertt red~rect or halt gradtng
acttvtty to ·11ow recovery of fosstls.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 9
All dwelllnts shall be located a mtntmum of ten feet from the toes and
tops of 811 slopes over ten feet tn verttcal hetght unles othenvtse
approved by the Planntng Director.
1. Natural dratnage courses shall be rata(ned in thetr natural state
vherever possible.
All brow dltches, terrace dratns and other m~nor swales '~here required
shall be loned flth natural eroston control materials or concrete, as
approved by the Planntng Director and Butldtng and Safety.
Any lmport or export of materials shall be tn accordance vtth County
Ordinances No. 457 &nd No. 565 respectively.
Prlor to the tssuance of BUILDING PERHZTS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
I. No butld(ng permtts shall be tssued by the County of Riverside for any
residential lot/untt ~tthtn the project boundary unttl the developer's
successor's-In-Interest prov(des evtdence of compliance wtth publlc
factlfty financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100)
per lot/untt shall be deposited wtth the Riverside County Department
of Bulldtng and Safety as mitigation for public l(brary development.
b. Prtor to the submittal of butldtng plans to the Department of Building
and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical
eng(neer to establ(sh app~opHate mitigation measures that shall be
applied to ~nd(v(dual dwelltng untts wtthtn the subdtv(ston to reduce
ambtent (ntertor notse levels to 45 CNEL and extertor noise levels to
65 CNEL.
c. Prtor to the fssuance of bu(ld(ng permtts, compos(te landscaping and
Irrigation plans shill be submitted for Plann(ng Department approval.
The plans abel1 address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscap(rig mnd trrfgatton to be (natalled tnclud(ng, but not l(mtted
to, parb~ Flant~ng, street trees, slope planting, and tndh~dual
front yard ~andscap(ng-
d. M1 dwelltags to be constructed' vtthtn thts subdtv(s(on shall be
designed and constr, cted vtth f(re retardant (Class A)roofs as
approved by the County F¶re Parshal.
e. Roof-mounted roechart(ca1 equlpment shall not be perm(tted vithtn the'
subd(v~ston, hexdever Sollr equtlxnent or Iny other energy savtng
devtces shall be permitted vtth Planning Department approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 10
f. ~utldtng separation between mll buildings including flreplmces shall
not be less thaa ten (10) feet.
g. All street stde yard setbacks shall be ·mtntmum of ten (10) feet.
h. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic-
irrigation.
Prior to the tssumnce of. OCCUPANCY PEP~IITS the follwt.ng conditions shall
be satisfied:
All' 'landscaping end Irrigation shall be' installed in accordance with
approved plans prior'to the tssumnce of occupancy pemtts. If
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, tntertm landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be uttlized as app~oved by the Planntng
Director and the Director of Building.and Safety.
be
Rot withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical
study ts required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
mppl tcabl e.
c. Cancrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461.
d. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 460.
LeRey D. Smoel
IOd, D t 'v"~l~"qll · ~ SueYtToe
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER 6 COUNTY SURVEYOR
Nove~er 13, 1987
RIverside County Irianntng Coemdsston
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside. CA 92501
Re:
Tract Nap 22762
Schedule A - Teem SP
LadSes and Gentlemen:
Vtth respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced TanUttve land
d4vts(on ma , the had Department recmanends thjt the landdivider provtde the
.%-,
epprop~ate Q:s, and that ~e~r ~ss~on or unsccep~b~l~t~ my ~qu~re ~e mp
~ ~ ~su~tt~ for fu~er consideration- ~ese ~nances end the follo
cond~t(ons a~ essential ~rts and a ~qu~r~nt ~curHng ~n 0HE ~s as b~nd~n9
aS though ~t~ ~n a11. ~e~ are tntend~ ~ ~
descr~ ~ cond4tS~s for a c~lete design of ~e ~mp~veMnt- All
~9ard4~ ~e t~e mining of ~e cond~t~o~ shall ~ nferr~
~ ss~oner's ~fice. '
1.* ~e lsnddSv~der s~11 pro~ct d~st~ properties fr~
caus~ b~ alteration of the dra4nage patters, t.e., concentra-
tion of d~ve~on of fi~. ~otect~on s~11
const~ct4ng ade;s~ drainage fac~lSt~es ~nclud~n9 enlarging
ex~st~n hc~l~t~es or b~ secur(n a drs~age
~ Xll drainage easnnU shs~l ~ shom on ~e final mp
p~bctS~ s~11 H as app~ved b~ ~ bad
~ h ls~d~v4der *shall accept and p~rl~ dSs~se of ell offs~te
bad ~ssS~r ~U ~ use of struts for
~e p~v~s~oM of kUcle ~ of ~dS~nce ~. 460
ca~c4V o~ su~Sv~der shall p~v~de ade;a~
r~ses e
ctlltid as epp~v~ b~ ~ had
Tract' Map 22762
November 1)o 1987
Page 2
s
IMlor drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department;
Streets "8', *D" shall be improved within the dedicated right of
way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/
60')-
S. Street "C" shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in
A
accordance with County Standard No. lOS, Section · (36'/60').
Street "A" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement within a 45 foot part-width dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33').
7. Concrete sidewalks' shall be constructed throughout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk).
A primary and secondary access road to the nearest paved road
maintained by the County shall be constructed within the public
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section
B, 32'/0') at
( 6 a grade and alignment as approved by the Road
Cam,is·toner. This is necessary for circulation purposes.
Prior to the rocordatton of the final map, the developer shall
deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of
$150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should
the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter
into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to
the time of issuance of a building permit.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline roftle
extending a turintam, of 300 feet beyond the project ~undaries at
· grade and ·ltgrment as approved by the Riverside County Road
Con,at··toner. Completion of road improvements does not imply
acceptance for maintenance by County.
rlectrtcal and cmmmntcattons trenches shall be provide in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Aspbaltic anal·ton (fog seal) shall be applied n~t less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be ap lied at · rata of O. OS gallon per square yard.
Asphalt maul·ton shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications-
.. 'Tr,.-t t~ap 22762
Nov. e~ber 13. 1987
· ' Page 3.
)
13.
'18.
Standard cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the land
division.
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final mp and offered for dedication·
The landdivider shall comply with the caltrans recomendations as
outlined in their letter dated October 20, 1987 copy of which is
attached), prior to the recordatton of the final map.
The landdivider shall provide uttllty clearance from Rancho Calif-
ornia Water District prior to the recordatton of the final map.
A copy of the final map shall be submitted to caltrans, District
08, Post Office Box 231, Sen Bernardtno, California 92403;
Attention: Project Developnent for review and approval prior to
recordat, on.
The minimum centerline radtt shall be 300' or as approved by the
Road Commissioner.
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs end knuckles shall
be 35 feet,
All driveways shall confom to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face
Of curb.
All centerline tritersections shall be at 90* with m minimum 50'
tangent measured from flow line.
The street design and Improvement concept of this project shall be
c~mrdlnated with TR 22761, TR 21760 and $P 180.
GH:lh
Very truly 3tours,
bad Dlvtston Engineer
October 5. :1987
Riverside Co~mty PitTsing Co~ission
4080 Lemon
Rivers~de. CA OZSOI
CT 0 5 1987
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JG:; ~RACTI(AP 22162: Being a subdivision of portions of Lots
1, 2, 4 · 8 Block 18 and k portion st Lots I · IS Block Zg
st Pauba Find &rid V&ter Co. as shorn by Hip filed in Book
11. Page S0/of Hips, Records st San Diego CO~ALy
Cal~[ornia.
(CO Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Depmrtment of hbl~c Health has rev~eved Tentative Hap
~No.~22162 and recomnends that:
A rarer system shall be installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the valor
comp,ny &rid the He&lib Depsrtment. Permsnent
prints of the pi,ns ot the v&ter system ,h,11
be ,ubm~tted in triplicate. with , m~nimum ,c,le
not lems thu one inch equals 300 feet. along vxth
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter.
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
30int specifications. and the size of the math
at the ~unctioft of the new system to the
existing system. The plus shall comply ~n
all respects with Div. 6, Part I. Chapter ? of
the California Health and Safety Code. California
Administrative Code, Title 33, Chapter 16. and General
Order No. 303 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California,when applicable. The plans shall
be signed by · registered engineer and vatmr company
with the foJJoving certification: '! certify that the
design of the water system tn Tract Map 32762 is 'in
accordance vilh the water F/stem expansion plans of the
~ancho California Mater District and that the water
service, storage and distribution system viii be
adequate to provide water service to such tract.
This certification does not constitute s guarantee that
tt viii supply water to such tract at any specific
quantities. flows or pressures for fire protection or
any other purpose'.
Rivvr;ide County Planning Dep&rtmvnt
Page T~o
October 5, 19e7
This certification shall be signed by a responsible
official of the eater company. rDt_~ilDl_!gl~-~l
lg mi lt _&9_tbt_CL U Y_t cxtz :a_Qtt Gt_ e-£tX t
This Department' has a statement from.the R&ncho California
eater District agreeing to serve domestic eater to each and
every lot in the subdivision on demtnd providing
· ,timfactOry financial arrangements are compteted with the
subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial
arrangements to be Bade*prior to the recordalien of the
final map.
This. Department has a statement From the Eastern Municipal
Water District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the severs of th~ District. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approved by the District. the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate.
along with the original drawing. to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
manholes. complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications
and the size. of the sewers.at the junction.of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines ind water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a
registered engineer and the sever district with the
following certification: 'I certify that the design of the
sewer system in Tract Nap 22762 is in accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Huntcipal eater
District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at
this time to treat the anticipated vietee from the proposed
ig£ tze£ l, ttistJ, L£t t -iLltaa - e- ttas- lgL , bt
£tavtaL_ ec_Lbt_ttsecia lgo-ef--tbt-tlui&-aan.
It viII be necessary for the financial arrangements to be
made prior to the record&ttonof the final
21ncerely,
~nvirormer[~rv cos Division
lltl MA. IK~r ~
P. O. BOX Is, m.1,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Ilre'~eelDI, CALIIPOIIN IA Iliasr
Octabet 7, 1987
3riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
F~verside, California
Attentions Specific Plane
Jeff Wainstein
Ladies and Gentlemane
Rot Tract 22762
This is a proposal to' divide about 16' acres in the Temecula Valley
· re·.. The property As between Interstate 15 and Ynez Road ·bout
1100 feet south of Rancho California Road.
Well defined ridges and watercourses are the main geographical ~ea-
auras in this area. Storm runelf both from Tract 22761 to the east
and On this property is designed to be carried by interior street
system and outlettees ·t the southwest corner to · culvert under-
neath the freeway.' .According to the tentat~Lve map, storm runoff
generated by a pert of the northwest portion of this tract would be
d~verted.
Following are
the Dlstrict's reconnendationsx
This tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta
Creek/Temecula Valley Are· Dr·in·g,. Plan for which drainage
fees have bean adopted by the Board. Drainage'fees shell
be paid as set forth under the provisions of the 'Rules and
Regulations leer Administration of Area Drain·g, Plans',
&mended July 3, 1984s
· . Drainag· fees shell be paid to the Road C~muissioner as
part of the filing for record of the.subdivision final
map or parcel map, or if the recording of · final par-
eel map is waive,s, dr·in·g, fees shell be paid ·s a
condition of the waiver prior to recording · certifi-
cate of compliance evidencing t~s waive: of the parcel
mapx .or
b- At the option of the land divider, upon filing · re-
quit,Hi affidavit request~Lng defersant of the payment of
foes, the drainage foes shall be paid to the Building
Director ·t the tire of issuance of · grading permit or
building permit for each approvees parcel, whichever may
be first obtained after the recording of the subdivi-
sion final map or parcel mapt however,
Riverside County
Planning Department
Rel Tract 22762
- 2 -
October 7, 1987
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Counissioner as
a part of the filing i%r record of the subdivision
final map or parcel map, or before receiving a waiver
to record a land division, for each lot within the land
division where construct/on activity as evidenced by
one of the l~11owing actions has occurred since May 26,
1981 s
(a) A grading permit or building per=it has been
obtained.
(b) Grading or structures have been initiated.
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right. of
way should be contained within drainage easements shown on
the final map. A note should be added to the final map
stattng, 'Drainage easements shall be kept free of build-
ings and obstructions".
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected property owner(s). The document(s) should be
recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to
recordation of the final map.
All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb
and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the
street right of way, When either of these criteria are
exceeded, additional drainage facilities should be
installed ·
The property's street and lot grading should be designed in
· manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage
patterns with respect to tributary drainage area and outlet
points,
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
immediatel= following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream.properties or drainage
facilit/es-
°i
lttverside County
Planning Department
Re z Tract 22762
-3-
October 7, 1987
e
Development of this property should be coordinated with the
developmerit of adjacent propert~Les to ensure that
vatercourses remain unobstructed end stormwaters are not
diverted from one vatershed to ¬her. This my require
the construction of temporary drainage ~cilities or
offsite constructJLon and grading.
Drainage i~acllities outletting stwp conditions should be
designed to convey the tributary 100 yeer storm flows.
Additional eaergency escape should &leo be provided.
A col~ of the improvement plans, grading plans end final
map along with s~pporting hydrologic end hydraulic
calculations should be submitted to the District for review
and approval prior to recordation of the final map.
Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of
grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang
of this office at 714/787-2333.
Very truly yours,
co, ns/
TH L- FaDWARDS
· Fag nedr
]enior Civil Engineer
,10-6-87
I'IaRalRI & Enliaet. dal Offic=
4080 Lt,.m4m Suect. Evict It
lU~I.. CA fZS0t
(714) 7874606
JLITII~
11 22762
With rupec~ to the conditions of appzwal for the shove' referenced lend division.,
the Fire bpartnent reccmends the following fire protection ruesares be provided'
in accordance with ittversLde County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protect~n.,
·~andardst
Schedule "X" fire protecLt~n spproved standard fire hydrants (6"x4"~2J"), located
one at each street intersection e~d spaced m more than 330 feet. apart An shy
direction, with no portion of lay lot rx~ntage more than 16S feet fr~ a hydrut.
M~timum fire floe shall be ZOO0 G~M for 2 hours duration ·t 20 PSZ.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one cc~y of the water s~stes plans to the Fire
Department for revise. ~lans shall confers to fire hydrant types, location and
· pacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be
· igned/alVroved by a registered civil engineer and the local water ccs~any with
the following certifications el certify that the'design 6f the water system is
~n accordance with the requiresants prescribed by the Riverside County tire
Departsen~.'.
The zequired water s~stm, including fire hydrants, shall be installed end
accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any co2ustJ~e building
mter~al being placed o~ an individual lot.
All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roof/~g meterhi as
described in leelion 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any vood shinVies
or shakes shall baYS · Class ale rating end shall be alVfoved by the r/re
Vepartstnt S~lor to J~stallaf, lon-
MITIG~TIt:}N FEES
~ to the rwcordatlon of the final BXp, the de~alc~ef shall deposit with the
Xtvtrsid· County Fire Department · cash mm of 1400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection is~acts. Should the developer choose to defer the tim of
Staymerit, he/she my enter into · written agreesant with the County deferring
said payment to tbs tim of issuance of · build/~g perair.
All q~estions ragstaling the seenlug of the conditions shall be referred to the
rixe Departrant Planning and Zngineer~n9 sUf~.
DATE: Sept. ember 1, 1987
· ' RiVERSiDE (OUrlE,u
PL, n irlG DEP, :tEITIEFIC
Butldtng end Safety
Surveyor - Dave Dude
Road Department
Ilealth - Ralph Lucb RECEIVED
F1 re Protect1 on
FISh S Gaae lq, tVE:~.S,~O OCT6 1987
LAFCO Oou Yterra
e.s. po,. -
Service Ruth
.PALOMAR OBS~..~TORY
Rancho Callf.
Southern Celtf. Edtson
Southem Ca1 tf. Gas
General Telephone
Dept. of Transportation 18
14urrteta School
-Tamecain Union
Temecula Chamber of Ccenerce
fit. Palomit.
County L~brary
Coen(sstoner Bresson
TRACT 22762 - ($P) - E,A, 31941- Kit set
Development - NB$/Lowry - Rancho
Cal(fornta Dtstr(ct - First Supervisor(a1
D(strtct - Southwest corner of Rancho
Callforn(a Road and Ynez Road - R-R Zone
- 16 acres Into 51 lots - (Related cases
TR 21760rTR 22761 & CZ 5007) - Nod 119 -
A,P, 923-020-038
Please revted the case described above, along ~th the attached case map.
D(vts(on Coattree meettrig has been tentatively scheduled for October. 8,
clears, tt kr111 then 9o to publlc hearing.
A LInd
1987. If
Your con~ents end recommendat(otis are requested pr(or to October 1, 1987 in order that
maJf tnclude them In the staff report for this particular use,
$houqd you have aeyquesttens rega~!tng thts 1tea, please do not hesitate to contact
~eff Welnstetn It 787-1363
Planner
YlZAST ~ ATTACBZD
DATE: 1016187 SIGNATURE__ ~::::Z
PLFJI~[ prff t nmm and tttll Dr. itobet~J. Irucato/Amelstaat Dtrector/Yalomar
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
OtrlCl Ot rite DIIICtDI PALOMAI OIIEIVATOIY Ill-it
T~Ls me is rltht= 30 nixes of the Palmuir 0bset~atot-7 and is therefore
vtthLu the zone requtrZq the use of Xov-pressure sodira vapor lan~s for
street 1libtinS, &, stipulated by the Ilvarnide County Board of Superrhea.
I/e request that the design for other types of outdoor l~ghting that My be
employed an thb property he mite consistent vJth the spirit of the decision
of the Board of Supervisors vbich is intended to uttigate the adverse effects
ouch facilities have ou :be utro~outc81 research at YlJeuar. knelttin1
steps to t~at end include:
Use the m:b:Ltlm. nn anount of 11Rbt needed for the tuk.
2. Otint and shield Xilht to prevent direct ul~srd i11uutnsttou.
Tun off lights at 11:00 p.n. (or earXier) u~less, in c~erctal
applications, r. be usetiered business is omen past that time. In vhlch
case the l/Shim should be turned off at closlnl.
~se lc~d-;ressure sodl~ 1lips for roedvays, vaXkvays0 equtpmeuc yards,
parking lots, security ~nd ocher strutlet appltcaclous. T~ese
need not be turned off et 11:00
7or further information, call (818) 356-4035.
lobeFt J. Irncato
Assistant DLreccor
eAIAOINA. CALIIOIIII& Still TII, IJNONI t6181 IN*Ilia TILLS eelEli C<iCN I*ID
October 7, 1987
OCT 13 1987
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Joe A. Ludia
6faa T. ~
B~J.~
Riverside County Planning Department
4080 Iamon Street, 9th Floor
P~Lversids, California 92501-3657
Subject: Water Availability
Reference: Tract 22762
Gentleman:
Please be advised that the above-refeTenced
property is located within the boundaries of Rancho
California Water District. Water service, therefore,
would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the propert~ owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon ~he
property owner · signing an Agent7 Agreement which
assigns water management rights, if any, to RC~D.
If RCWD can be of fuz'cher service to you, please
.contact'this office.
Very truly yours,
RANClIO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Sanga P. D~herty//
Engineering Services Representative
TOZ2/vlrd25X
DATE: September 1, 1987
:IiVE::I: iDE coun v
PLAnninG DEP, AtEmEnC
TO: Assessor
But I dt ng Ind S4fe~
Surveyor - Dave Duda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Laths
Ft re Protacit on
flood Control Dtstrlct
Ft s h & Game
I.AFCI) Dou Yterrm
U.S. Posta~ Service - Ruth E. Davidson
'RanchoCallf. "
Southern Caltf. Edison
Southern Caltf, Gas
General Telephone
Dept. of Trans rUtton 18
14u~rieta $choo~
.Tamecain Union
Tamecalm Chamber of Conne~ce
fit. Palmr
County Library
tomlistener iresson
OCT 0 9 1987
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TRACT 22762 - (SP) - E.A. 31943 - Kaiser
Development - NBS/Lovry - Rancho
California District - First $upervtsorta
Distrtct- Southwest corner of Ranthe
Caltforntm Road and Ynez Road - R-R Zone
- 16 acres into 51 lots - (Related cases
TR 21760/TR 22761 & CZ 5007) - Hod 119 -
A.P. 923-020-038
aleuse review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for October 8, 1987. If it
clears, tt will then 9o to public hearing.
Your Co~ments and recommendations are requested prior to October 1, 1987 in order that we
may include thm tn the staff report for this particular use.
Should you hive may questions regarding this item, please de not hesitate to contact
Jeff Wetnstetn It 787-1363
Planner.
Node el future delivery: centraZised, Contact vith U.S.P.S. Grovth
Coordinator required before construction for deZivery Zocations,
ATE: SlSN,TURS
PLEASE print name aM title
4080 LEMON STREET, r" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE., CALIFORNIA 92501
4~-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
DATE: Sep~;e~er 1, 1987
:IiVE::IbiDE COUntY
PLAnninG DEPAt; EnC
TO: Assessor
lutldtng and $efet~
Surveyor - Dave Dudo
Rued Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
FIood Control Dt stFI ct
Ftsh i 6aae .'
..-...
· SerYt ce - Ruth E, Davidson
OCT 0 ? 1987
RIVERSIDE COUNTY "-
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Rancho Caltf.
Southern Callf. Edison
Southern Caltf. Gas
General Telephone
Dept.. of Transportation
t4urrteta 5chool
.Temecula Unton
Teaecula Chamber of Cene~ce
fit. PaiNmr
County Library
Coma1 sstoner Bresson
~RACT 22762 - ($P).- E,A. 31943 -Katser
Development - fiBS/Lowry .- Ron~ho
Clllfornla District -Ftrst Supervtsorta
Olstrtct - Southvest corner of Rancho
California Road and Ynez Road - R-R Zone
- 16 acres tnto 51 lots - (Related cases
TR 21760/TR 22761 & CZ 5007) - Hod 119 -
A,P. 923-020-038
?lease revtw the case described above, along vtth the attached case map. A Land
Dtvtslon Conn4ttee meettag has Men tentatively scheduled for October .8, 1987. If tt
'clears, tt v111 then 9o to public hearing, : -'
Your comaants and reconnendotions are requested prior to October 1, 1987 tn order that
may Include them tn the staff report for thts larttcular use,
Should you have any questions regarding this 1tam please do not heat tale to contact
Jeff Mainstein at 787-Z363
Planner
4080 LEMON STREET, rN FLOOR 46.209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
')EPARTN~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
October 2..0,,-1987
OCT 2 2 B87
RIVEFIS,D~, COUNTY
PLANNING DEPART~IENT
Development Rev~ev
08-R~v-15-Q.83
Tour Reference:
TTH 22761 end
TTH 22762 .
tlennini Department
County of Riverside
Attention Nr. Jeff Veinstein
.~080 Lemon Street
'liveraide,. CA 92501
Dear Hr. Veinstein:
Thank you for the opportunity to review proposed TTH 22761 and
TTH 22762 located southwesterll of Rancho California Road and Znez
load, east of Interstate 15 i~ Rancho California.
Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have
been lndXcate~ by the items checked and/or by those items noted
under additional comments. .
If any work is necessary'within thi state highway right of way,
the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
District 8 Office of the State Department of Transportation prior
to beginning the work.
If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Patrick M.
'Cormell7 st {11~) 383-~38~- '
Very truly yours,
District Permits [nlineer
tlth~2~ t~e traffl~ and dralnage generated by this proposal do not appear to hav~
· significant effect on the state h12tFay system, consideration must be glv~ to
· the cu~lstlve effect of continued develop--at In this are. Any musuru
necexsary to adtlpte the m~-~latlve impact. of traffic and drainage ahculd be
_~ Zt appears that the traffic and drainage learated by tltts proposal eculd have ·
I[Intflc~t, e. ffeet. on the state htl~day system of the tea, ~ measuru necessary
· .- to saltS late the traff&e and dralnale impacts should be included kith the
Thls pertlea at' state lttgtw~ ~8 lncluded in the California Master Plan of State
HlglFa2n Ellllble for Offlelal 2carte Hlgl~ay Destgnatlcn, and In the future yckr
agency may. krlah to have this route efflcla:lly daslgrated as · state scenl~ hl~Nay.
,Thls por'cton of state hlg!~ray has been officially designated as · sta~e scerflc
htgh~r/, and developneat In titan corridor should be ccmpar, lble with the seerile
ht2h4y erasept.
It is ~cognized that there is ocnsiderable public emcern ebo~t noise levels
· dJaeenC to heavily traveled h12h4ys. Land develc~ment, in order to be ca:patlble
with titis concern, my require special noise attenuation measures. Development of
property should include any necusary noise attenuation.
' Iknml rl~ht of vrZ dedication to provide.
Iretin1 greet, 4~provem~ta to prarLde
half-~ldth on the state htghv~y.
half-vldth on the state bighay.
C~b and lutter, State Stan.d~d ' alml 'the state hll~May.
Farklng be prohibited 81q the It~te hlg!~my by paintin2 the cdrb red
.and/or by the Iraper placement of aria parkln2" SLIM,
radius ~urb returns be provided at intersections with the state Ril~sy.
~dard k~elchalr rup mat be prorlded in the returns.
I positive vdxtcular 6arrler alq the prepsraT frontage be provided to 11mtt'
I~rslcal seem t~ the state btl~ay, · -
Vehicular -=~ess net be developed dlrmtly te abe state Mg!~uy,
T~dcular seeus to the state Midray be provided by exlstln2 public road
emnectlces,
Velttcular access t~ the state hll~ay be provided by.._._ standard
drlvekmya,
Velttcula~ access shsl~ not be provided within of the tnteraectla. at
Vehlaalar ames to the state hl2huay be provided by a road-t~pe camectlon.
V,a~aAlsr e--~e__-; oa t:+.lons be paved s~ less~ wit,~n t~e sts~e hiil~sy rtgl~ o~"
Access points to t~e stsl~e higt~d~y be developed in · mnne~ ths~ vii1 provide sigh~
~Lst~nce fo~ sph Ll.c~g the sl~s~e !~g~my.
· Lsndscsping al.ong the state higr~ay be lc~ and forgiving in nat~e.
I left-txa~ -lan~, including any nece~ar7 ~d~ing, be p~ovided c~ the state
kt2huay s~ ·
Cc~s~deratic~ be [~ven to the prmrLt~m, or
lightinK of the int~secticn ~f and
' 'ldeq~ate err-street parktng~ ubl~b dees net, require backtrig enta ~ state
be prgv~ded.
Psrking lot be developed in · mnnes' thst will not csuse shy veht~sr roverant
· conflicts, including park~g stall entrance and exi~;, within of the
· entrance £ran t~e state higrnmy-
Hsndicep parking not be ~eveloped in the busy drivewsy entrance
Csre be taken ~zn developing this ireperry t4} preserve snd perpetuste the ezistinS
.drs~nsge pattam or the state ~Shvsy. Psrticulsr considerstim should be given to
cumlst~ve ~ncressed st4s"m rimoff t~ Xnsure thst · ~2h~sy drsSnsge probla=
crested.
Affy necessary nj~se attemstion be prcvtded as part or the develcpaent cr ~h~s
property.
Any propouls to furt~r develop this property.
'A copy of the traffic or envircme~tal study, Sf recited. A check print of the Farcel cr Trsct Hsp, if required.
a check print of the Flsns fc~ any I~p~oveeents within the state rdgh~sy right or
~sy, if required.
C~TY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Extension of Time, Tentative Tract No. 22762
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
( Quimby )
Public Facility
( Traffic Mitigation )
Public Facility
Traffic Signal Mitigation )
Public Facility
I Library )
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 1
Condition No, 2
Condition No. 12
Condition No. County
Road No. 9
Condition No. 3
Condition No.
dated 10/6/87
Letter
Condition No.
F!ood District No. 1
M9/Planning
ITEM NO.
7
ORDINANCE NO. 90-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That a Contract between the City Council of the City of Temecula and
the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby
authorized, a copy of said Contract being attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A", and by such
reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.
SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized, empowered, and
directed to execute said Contract for and on behalf of said Agency.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption, and
prior to the expiration of 15 days from the passage thereof shall be published at least twice in
the Californian, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of
Temecula and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 30th day of October, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Ords 90-17
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 90-17 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 9th day of October, 1990, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 30th day of
October, 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
3/Ords 90-17
* * * C 0 P Y , , , EXHIBIT A
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC ENPLOYEES' RETI~ SYSTEN
CITY COUNCIL
OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
In consideration of the covenants and agreement hereafter contained and on the
part of both parties to be kept and performed, the governing body of above
public agency, hereafter referred to as "Public Agency", and the Board of
Administration, Public Employees' Retirement System, hereafter referred to as
"Board", hereby agree as follows:
All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age"
shall mean age 60 for local miscellaneous members.
Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after making its
employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to
all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as
apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided
for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except
those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election
of a contracting agency.
Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
local miscellaneous members).
In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not
become members of said Retirement System:
a. SAFETY EMPLOYEES.
*** COPY ***
1
L
0
0
The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member
shall be determined in accordance with Section 21251.13 of said
Retirement Law (2% at age 60 Full).
Public Agency elected to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
a. Section 20024.2 (One-Year Final Compensation)·
Sections 21263, 21263.1 and 21263.3 (Post-Retirement Survivor
Allowance).
Sections 21380-21387 (1959 Survivor Benefits) including Section
21382.2 (Increased 1959 Survivor Benefits).
Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the
contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future
service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members of said
Retirement System.
Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as
follows:
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one in-
stallment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs
of administering said System as it affects the employees of
Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or
of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one in-
stallment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
*** COPY ***
10.
Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days
after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as
may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the
correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper
adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances.
Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any
employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the
Board.
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
BY
(~ TEM
PUBLIC EM
PERS-CON-702 (NEW AGENCY)
(Rev. 5/89)
CITY COUNCIL
OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY
Presiding Officer
Witness Date
Attest:
Clerk
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Public Agency Contract Services
Contract Services Division - Section 220
p.o. 94 709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
Telephone (916) 326-3420
326-3000 (Tel.communications
Device for the Deaf)
EXHIBIT B
CONTRACT OF
CITY OF TEMECULA
WIT~ THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIR]~4ENT SYST]~4
FOR MAKING AN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS STATED ~m~EIN
By this AGREEMENT made this 5th day of 3uly , 19 90 , in accordance
with and subject to the provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law by
and between the City Council of the
City of Temecula ,
hereinafter referred to as Agency, and the Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as System, Agency and System agree as follows:
Agency herewith retains the services of System to perform the valuation(s)
required by Section 20453 of the Public Employees' Retirement Law for the
purpose of determination by the Board of Administration of the Public
Employees' Retirement System of the contributions to be made by Agency if
agency adopts a contract with said Board which provides for benefits as
described in Attachment A. \
Be
Agenc~ will pay $ 154.00 plus $6.00 per employee to System upon
completion of the actuarial valuation, such fee being based on the
number'of persons and membership categories involved.
C. Any and all data and information requested by System from Agency for use in
compilation of this valuation shall be furnished ~o System by Agency upon
request by System. The actuarial tables and p~ocedures to be used in the
valuation shall be in accordance with the tables approved by said Board of
Administration. System shall have sole control of the valuation and its
judgement in the determination thereof shall be final and conclusive. All
work sheets and final results and reports, the product of the valuation,
shall be and remain the property of the System.
abo e written.
Witness our hands the day and year first ~~
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ~ CITY 0F TEMEC A
B
BY
N
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
TITLE C~
Contract Valuation
FCSD-CON-6A
C0706A (Rev. 9/89)
. PUblid Employees* Xetirementi Sy~'tem
': .Public Agency Contract Services
-:!".Contr~t iServices Division, Sect ion 220
.~', '::"Sacramento~..:..CA': 94229-2709
~ :-:'.~ '~':Telephone..(916) 326-3420
326-3000 (Teleco~unications
~vice ~or the Dea~)
.:f~, - .* , ~'.:: ~ '~ ~ , · ."
". ..
MISCELLANEOUS
Following is a summary of benefits and exclusions which are included in all
contracts and a display o~ benefits and benefit formulas which will be
utilized in the actuarial calculation for your agency..,
Retirement law provides the following benefits in each contractz""'
Three highest years final compensation average* "~:'~:
Pre-Retirement Death Benefit - 1957 Survivor Benef'it
Post-Retirement Death Benefit - $500 lump sum payment*
You are permitted to contract with PERS by category. This means ~hat you are
not required to include Policeand Fire and Miscellaneous. 'However, all'em-
ployees in a covered category must be members of the Retirement System unless
they are specifically excluded by;the'Government Code as followsz
- appointment or em~lo~menttcontract ~fixes a term of full-time~
continuous employment of siXmonths~or'less*~ :'
Employees serving on a pard-time basis where his position requires
service for less ~han an average of 20 hours a week.
Persons in employment which, in the opinion of the board, is on a
seasonal, limited-term, on-call,~emergency, intermittent, substitute~
or other irregular basis until the employee ~orks more than 125 days
or 1,000 hours within the fiscal year. :I. . .. : . :
CETA employees.hired after July l, 1979, if they are in positions that
would otherwise qualify them as PERS miscellaneous members (non-safety).
CETA employees hired in~o saEe~y positions such as policemen or':Eiremen
are no~ excluded from P~S membership. ".~"'.'
.Please refer to the PERS Handbook.
FCSD-CON-19M
C0712 (Rev. 4/89)
-(See Reverse)
..t:,~ , 7 '.:.:,~"
DATEs June 26, 1990
1.0 ENPLOlrER CODE
AGENCY · NAME
.,v.,~;;~:"::.n,-
": '~ ,:., ' ';:--".'. ,;l~. !:: iV2j' ;'r"l,l)C/~2P~g~OFrlCl
.... R~t4.'_lt~,rnnYdt ~n' F~ P1 d Office
.r:~,,;:-{~,~l,I[..~f] !':Third St:'. Rm. 214
CITY OF TEMECULA :{~;i:z'::.r,~ 'Snn'~Rprn~rdt noV CA 94201
.... .! :' "'.: 2 ; ',._"'"~r.: .' ~ .<' ~. .".5'ni'~L.:" ...... '
· i;"~: 'd.: i~.i .'~' ..:,",:'
': ': ': MISCEbF.,ANilOUIt
MODIFIED
3.0 COVERAGE GROUV
4°0 COVEBAGE SI!ICE
SOC SMC: COVERAGEz
5.1 ..~F~I~. DATE
5.2 DIVISI~ DATE
5.3 T~INATION DATE
5.4 ~CLUSIONS
RETIREBENT COVERAGEs :: .. · .... . :
6.1 FORHULA ., . ~,,,..
6 · 2 ACCOUI'fi' .CODE
6.3 PRIOR SERVICE t. .. ! ,.
6.4 MEMER COl~ RATE ,
2% @ 60 Full
O0
100%
7%
e..: Section 20835. r -. Limit Prior.:Seryice/:~-:,,'
to Members: Employed on Contract.Date': . , '...... ,r' '.'~', i?'-"'-l~'" ~. 'c',
Sec'tion 20024.2 - One-Year *.Final, Compensation Yes
Sections 21263 &'21263.1 ':Post'Retirement.7'! i ~ !r~:U'!'s"' '
~1.1 ....,' , ~.i~ , Yes
Survivor Allowance.' ,-' - ,.~'{':-..,..',-; :'~' ,i.i ',,..:~..-' .... ' ....
Sections' 21380 -21387 195~
' - '- "'. :,' ~ ~.- " '~: '~" '~T V~:;"
Benefits ' including .... ;/' ~;,,' ~" ~"' d" ' '~ ': '~'~ 'f-" ~[.~ ':~ r':i"'~'~;' :'~'
"1959 ~Survivor. Benefits ;vc."
R~SS,~ S~Y: "~; "',' . '.' :'I'.'.,:. i.~.~-:~. c;~::~',s:~:,.Z,~iq:'. No'
9., '.,-: -'."-,~~,' ".."'',...,; 5-',,, ......' .........' "' .......
. · ' ' 'r, -'-~ .....' .ir~: ;,~, '~', ~ .~: .i'~C; 'fi'i 4'5 ':'
, . · ..... . ' , .... · .c.
' '; : '!,'~v,':' :' :,5 ' ',< ~ 'n~ 'j:o~ ~;'
~ISHIP .';,
LOCAL SYSTEH
13.1 NONEY TRNSFRD TO ENPLOYEE'S ACCOUNT
13.2 EMPLOYER MONEY TRNSFRD
13.3 ZNACTIVES TRNSFRD
13.4 RETIRED LIVES TRNSFRD
No
FCSD-CON-IgM
,C0712 (Rev. 4/89)
-2-
';PERS
Contract Services Division
P.O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
(916) 326-3420
326-3000 (Telecommunications
Device for the Deaf)
EXHIBIT C
!Reply to Section'220
.Public Agency Contract Services
Contract Services.pivision
SERVICE RETIREMENT
SU~4ARY OF MAJOR PROVISIONS
2% @ 60 (1/50) FormulaI(Sectton 21251.13)
Local Miscellaneous Members .
.
Members credited with at least five years service may retire upon attaining
age 50. There is no compulsory retirement age.
The monthly retirement allowance is determined by age at retirement,, years
of service credit, and final compensation. The basic benefit is 2% of final
compensation for each year of credited service upon retirement at age 60.
If retirement is earlier than age 60, the percentage of final.compensation
for each quarter year is decreased. If retirement is deferred beyond age 60,
the percentage of final compensation for each quarter year of agedincreases
to age 63.
Final compensation is the average monthly salary (full-time rate excluding
overtime) during: 1) the final 36 consecutive months preceeding separation
from employment, unless the member designates another 36 consecutive month
period; or, 2) if provided by the employer's contract, during the~12
consecutive months preceeding retirement or separation, unless the member
requests another 12 consecutive month period. .. ...... r!.
DISABILITY RETIREMENT ~ :.i. ,.,i-..!
Members permanently incapacitated from performing their duties are eligible
for disability retirement if they have at least five years service credit.
The monthly retirement allowance is 1.8% of final compensation for each year
of service. Employees who have between 10.000 and 18.519 years s~rvice.credit
may receive up to one-third of their final compensation. If provided by the
employer's contract, the benefit would be a minimum of 30% of final
compensation for five years of service credit and 1% of=final compensation for
each additional year of service to a maximum benefit of 50% of final
compensation. The disability retirement allowance cannot exceed the allowance
payable upon retirement for service at age 60, if employment could be continued
to that age. If the member is eligible for serv. ice retirement,.the service
allowance is payable if greater than the disability allowance.
t -~ ~,.~,~
INDUSTRIAL DISABILITY RETIREMENT, , { :..: :,;, ,,.,
If provided by the employer's contract, members permanently incapacitated from
performing their duties as a result of a job-related injury or illness receive
50% of their final compensation (or more by additional contract provisions).
Employees who enter miscellaneous membership after January l, 1980, are limited
to the amount they would have received for service retirement, had they con-
tinued to work until age 63. If the member is eligible for service retirement,
the service allowance is payable if greater than the industrial disability
allowance.
FCSD-CON-44
C10027 (Rev. 7/89)
Public employees* Retirement System
Public Agency Contract Services
Contract Services Division - Section 220
POSt Office Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709 .
Telephone (916) 326-3420
326-3000 (telecommunications
Device for the Deaf)
CERTIFICATION OF CONPLI~qCE WITH
GOVERNHENT CODE SECTION 7507
I hereby certify that in accordance with Section 7507 of the Government
Code the future annual costs as determined by the System Actuary and/or the
increase in retirement benefit(s) have been made public at a public meeting
by the of
(governing body) (public agency)
at least two weeks prior to the adoption of the final Ordinance/Resolution.
Dates
original signature
official title
PERS-CON-12A (Rev. 11/88)
C060l
ITEM
NO.
8
ORDINANCE NO. 90-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAFFER 12.06 TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING VEHICLE
WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS ON THE PUBLIC STREETS.
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police submitted a report to the City Council which concludes
that vehicles exceeding a gross weight to 6,000 pounds pose a traffic and safety hazard when
traveling on certain identified streets within the City of Temecula;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 12.06 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code, which
shall read as follows:
"CHAPTER"
TRUCK WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS
Sections:
12.06.010 Prohibition
12.06.020 Designation
12.06.030 Signs
12.06,010. Prohibition. Vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight limit of 6,000
pounds are prohibited on the streets designated in Section 12.06,020 of this chapter.
12.06.020. Designation. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, the following
streets or portions of streets are restricted to vehicles not exceeding a maximum gross weight
of 10,000 pounds:
1. Calle Medusa, from La Serena to Nicholas Road
12.06.030. Signs. Whenever this Chapter or any ordinance of the City designates any
street or portion thereof as a restricted street, the City Engineer shall cause said street to be
posted with signs providing substantially as follows: "Restricted Access - Vehicles Under
10,000 pounds only."
12.06,040. Exceptions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to:
(1) Commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress
by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups
3/Orals06 -1-
or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on
the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona
fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the
restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained.
(2) Passenger buses under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities commission;
(3) Any vehicle owned by a public utility necessary for the construction, installation,
maintenance or repair of public utilities; or
(4) Any vehicle owned and operated by a public agency.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 30th day of October, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/ords06 -2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 90-20 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 16th day of October and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 30th day of October,
1990 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
3/Orals06 -3-
ITEM NO. 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Engineering Department ~
October 30, 1990
Release of Monument Bond
for Tract No. 18518-2
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Robert Righetti
That the City Council AUTHOR I ZE the release of monument
bond for Tract No. 18518-2, and DIRECT the City Clerk to
so advise the clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
DISCUSSION:
On March 8, 1988, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with:
Centex Real Estate Corporation
3190 Chicago Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
for the improvement of streets, the installation of sewer
and water systems, and survey monumentation.
Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety
bonds issued by:
Safeco Insurance Company of America.
On March 15, 1990, in accordance with Riverside County
Ordinance ~60, Section 15.11 I ), the County Road
Commissioner reduced the security amounts for street
improvements, water system, and sewer system to provide
the required guarantee and warranty securities for the
one { 1 ) year maintenance period.
No action was taken on the monument bond at that date as
several technical requirements had not been met.
STAFFRPT\TR18518.-2 1
The necessary requirements have now been satisfied.
The inspection and verification process relating to the
subdivision monumentation has been completed by the
County of Riverside Transportation Department, and City
Staff agrees with the recommendation to release the
monumentation bond. Therefore, it is appropriate to
release this bond as follows:
Bond No. 5490661 in the amount of
$9,300.00 to cover Survey Monumentation.
RR:ks
Attachment:
Location Map
STAFFRPT\TR18518.-2 2
gO.
Z. OCA TtOM MAP
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Engineering Department '~
October 30, 1990
Release of Monument Bond
for Tract No. 22593-2
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDAT ION:
DISCUSSION:
Robert Righetti
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of monument
bond for Tract No. 22593-2 and DIRECT the City Clerk to
so advise the clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
On July 27, 1988, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with:
Burgener/Denham, Inc.
935 W. Mission Avenue, #H
Escondido, CA 92025
for the improvement of streets, the installation of sewer
and water systems, and survey monumentation,
Accompanyin9 the subdivision agreements were surety
bonds issued by:
Golden Eagle Insurance Company
On March 27, 1990, in accordance with Riverside County
Ordinance 460, Section 15.1 ( I ), the County Road
Commissioner reduced the security amounts for street
improvements, water system, and sewer system to provide
the required guarantee and warranty securities for the
one 11 ) maintenance period.
No action was taken on the monument bond at that date as
several technical requirements had not been met.
STAFFRPT\TR22593.-2 1
The necessary requirements have now been satisfied.
The inspection and verification process relating to the
above item has been completed by the County of Riverside
Transportation Department and City Staff agrees with the
recommendation to release the monumentation bond.
Therafore, it is appropriate to release this bond as
fol lows:
Bond No. SUR 07q~121 in the amount of
$8,800.00 to cover Survey Monumentation.
RR:ks
Attachment:
Location Map
STAFFRPT\TR22593.-2 2
Project Site
VICINITY MAP
no scale
ITEM
NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 30, 1990
Appeal No. 9, Plot Plan No. 11609
PREPARED BY:
Steve Jiannino
R ECOMMEN DAT I ON:
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the
Planning Commission's Denial of Plot Plan No. 11609.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Jeff Hardy Architecture
REPRESENTATIVE:
Jeff Hardy Architecture
PROPOSAL:
To construct a 18,453 square foot retaiI and
furniture showroom commercial center.
LOCATION:
North side of Winchester Road, 700 feet southwest
of the centerline of Jefferson Avenue.
EXISTING ZONING:
M-SC I Manufacturing - Service Commercial )
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: M-SC IManufacturing - Service
Commercial )
South: M-SC IManufacturing - Service
Commercial )
East: M-SC I Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
West: M-SC iManufacturing - Service
Commercial )
STAFFRPT\APP9 1
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Vacant
North: Vacant
South: Commercial
East: Vacant
West: Office
BACKGROUND:
On October 1, 1990, the Planning Commission denied
Plot Plan No. 11609 by a vote of :3-1 based on the
intensity of the project, concerns about future uses
of the site not having sufficient parking, and
possible incompatible use with surrounding
projects. The Planning Commission made the
following changes to the Findings and Conditions of
Approval:
Findinqs:
1. Changed Finding No. 1 to read:
"The proposed use will have a substantial
adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. The project proposed
a commercial retail use with the surrounding
properties being office buildings. The
project does not provide sufficient parking if
the showroom is converted this would
encourage use of adjoining properties for
necessary parking."
Changed Finding No. 5 by replacing
"consistent" with "inconsistent" and adding:
"The project does not provide sufficient
parking for the site."
Conditions:
Replaced Page 5 with new Engineering
Conditions submitted at the hearing.
Changed Condition No. 7 by replacing
"applicant" with "owner/development".
Changed Condition No. 31 by adding: "or as
provided by the CC&R's already established
for the site".
STAFFRPT\APP9 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council UPHOLD the
Planning Commissions DENIAL of Plot Plan No. 11609
based on the Planning Commission's findings.
SJ:ks
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission Minutes
dated October 1, 1990
2. Plannin9 Commission Staff Report
packet dated October 1, 1990
STAFFRPT\APP9 3
.ANN f N~
6, PLt)'P PLAN NO. 11609
Prnlno,~ai to con,~trUct an ]8,7P5 sauare foot reta.i]
,~howrnnm-furni ture store nn t. he nnr. th side of ~nterprise
ci rc.~ P, west of Jefferson ~venue.
SmEVE JIANNINO provided the staff r~.port. on. this item.
He adv.ised tb~ Commission that staff was concerned
with the 1. nodlog and unl. nading space, He stated that
the proiect js nnt designed w.it~ rear loading doors;
however the apDl. i. cant has indicated that the building
w~ ).1 be a fnrn~ture showmorn for d~sD)ay only and that
the sal.~s and shi. pVi. nq wi.).l be f~om annt. her location.
COMNTSSTONER CHINTARFF annressod the issue of a furniture
showroom located in a office/industrial building area.
GARY THORNHII,L stated that the p]ann3ng staff cannot
address the issue of use, which is set by the ordinance.
JOHN MIDDT,RmON a~vjsed tn~ Commission that Condition of
Approval. No. 31 was amended to read "area shown as 30'
x 50' lnqr~s~ and egress on the plot Plan sha]] be
improved with A.C. pavement to the same standards as
the on-site parklog lot".
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing.
JEFF HARDY, Jeff Hardy Architecture, 27349 Jefferson
Avenue, Temecula, advised the Commission that Condition
of Approval No. 23 stipulated that Buildings A and B,
which comprised of sixty to seventy percent of the
project could only be used for furniture, drapery,
plumbing, floor covering, and appliance stores. He
also commented that the CC&R's required the driveway
approaches to be decorative concrete and therefore
would ]~ke Condition No. 33 amended. JOHN MIDDLETON
stated that concrete would be acceptable. Regarding
k, MIN. 10 / 1/90 -8- 10 / 10/90
'P.n,ANN!NG CONM.fSS'r(~N ~4:rNII'P1;Lq OC'POR~:}~, 'I, 1990
Condi. tinn No, 2..?, Mr, ~aroy r~uested ~hat a restaurant
.be a.l Jow~ to 1D liDitS C t.~rou~h F if t.bey ca~ Drov~e
based on the requirement~ n~ t.h~ ordinance.
GARY THORNHII,I, actv~sed t~e Commission the Cond.it.ions 23
and 2? w~re not aDpl. icab[e unl. ess the a~Ol. icant aqreed to
t~m, ~. ~ARDY stated that be would agree to Condition
No. 2~. and Condition No. 22 with the modification he
HARDY reavesteal Cond3t~on No. 45 be deleted because ~t
aDDl. ied 'I'.O Pl. ot Plan No. 1.1.759. He also asked i.~ the City
Attorney wou.id approve Condition No. 7 to read "The owner/
developer shal[ agree". JOHN CAVANAUGH stated that this
would be acceptable.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAF. FF expressed concern for the quantity
and l. ocatlon o[ the trash enct. osure. MR. HARDY stated
t~at the trash enc)osure cou)d be en]arged to boZld another
trash bl, n; however, in working wl. th the City requirements
and the CC&R's, the proposed )neation of the trash bin
was the most appropriate- pl. ace. COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF
and COMMISSIONER FORD suqgeste~ reversing the .landscape
is[and and the trash encl. osure locations. MR. HARDY was
agreeable to the ~u~gest~on.
The Commission expressed concern in approving the project
knowjn~ that future uses of the site may cause the project
to he underparked. They also expressed concern for the
lack ot a~equate trash fac.i].ities for the uses add size of
the project and the proposed loading zone.
COMMISSIONER FAHF. Y moved to close the public bearing and
not adopt the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No.
3]609, not adopt Resolution 90-. ..... and deny Plot Plan
No. 11609, Request for Site Approval. COMMISSIONER BLAIR
secnnded the mot,i on.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF recommended that instead of
denying the application, it be continued to allow the
applicant to work with staff on the problems. The motion
stood as made.
~, MIN. 10/1/90 -9- 10/10/90
PI.ANN|NG (;(IMMTBSION M INIITRS
AYRS: 4 COMM I SS l ON F. RS:
NOES: 0
hR,qEN~': '1
COMMI SS I(INERS:
COMM l SSI ONERS:
0CTORF. R il , ] 990
RI. air, ,~'ahey, ~ord
C',h~ n~ aeff
Nnne
Hoag~ and
PLOT PLAN NO. 11.17,59
'/..'1 rnDn.qa.I tn cnn.qtrUct an :!H,300 square foot 3ndustrja
5 i.[dj. nq on the nnrt. h side of Enterprise Circle, wes~ of
..... [ ~ .
~ n nP.
. ueste~ Condj tj on No. 3 amended to
r~ad "Construe C. or cnncr~t~ pavem, After
Commission djs~tl on, Condition No. was amended to
read "Cnnstruct c pavement. j. rovements".
COMM]SSIONER CHIN]
t pub] j c heari rig.
JEFF HARDY, Jeff Hardy
Avenue, Temecu] a, regueste
to the Conditions of Appr. No. 7, replace the word
apP.I ~ cant w~ th owner
reqllirement woul. d Like utiki
for park3 ng sta I .~ s,
27349 Jefferson
fo] {ow.~ng modj f~ catj oDs
No. 9, if not a City
single ].ine striping
The Comm] ssj on concern be ] OCatiOn and
number of dust/' reciprocals. applicant and
the Commission 'reed that rather than ace them
inside the bl ],they should be ptac. outside the
buj ]d~ng w.~ a wa]] to properly .~creen .
COMMISS: F&HF.Y moved to cl. ose the public h rj. ng and
adopt .e Negat.jve Dec:{ arati on for P]o~ Plan No. 1759,
MIN.10/1/gO -10- 10/10/90
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 1, 1990
Case No.:
Prepared By: Deborah Parks
Recommendation: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Jeff Hardy Architecture
Jeff Hardy Architecture
To construct a 18,453 square foot retail and
furniture showroom commercial center.
North side of Winchester Road, 700 feet southwest
of the centerline of Jefferson Avenue.
M-SC (Manufacturing - Service Commercial)
North: M-SC (Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
South: M-SC (Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
East: M-SC (Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
West: M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
Vacant
North: Vacant
South: Commercial
East: Vacant
West: Office
STAFFRPT\PP11609 1
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
The application for Plot Plan No. 11609 was
originally submitted to the Riverside County
Plannin9 Department on November 20, 1989. The
proposal was reviewed by the Riverside County
Land Division Committee on three occasions,
December 14, 1989, February 22, 1990, and April
30, 1990. The case was scheduled to be heard at
the June 25, 1990 Riverside County Planning
Director's hearin9, however, the file was
transferred to the City for further processing. The
development request was then reviewed by the
City's Development Review Committee on August 30,
1990.
Circulation/Traffic
The City's Engineering Department reviewed the
Traffic Study which was prepared for the proposed
project by the applicant's Traffic Engineer. The
City's Engineerin9 Department determined that this
project will contribute a very small amount of traffic
to the existin9 area traffic volumes.
Project traffic at the closest intersection,
Enterprise Circle North ( east lecj ) and
Winchester Road, would only represent a 3.1%
increase in existin9 peak hour volumes.
Project traffic at the Jefferson Avenue and
Winchester Road intersection represents a
1.1% increase in existing peak hour volumes.
Project traffic at the southbound 1-15 ramp
and Winchester Road intersection represents
a 1.0% increase in existing peak hour
volumes.
Based on the criteria established by the Riverside
County Guidelines, none of the intersections
examined by the traffic study would experience an
increase of 5% or more in existing peak hour traffic
volumes as a result of the proposed project.
Therefore, none of the intersections will be
significantly impacted by this project.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 2
The traffic study indicates that future levels of
service with or without the project would be
virtually the same as is shown with the percentages
of increase in the existin9 peak hour traffic.
Since the City is collecting a fee for the Temecula
City-wide Road Benefit Fund, additional mitigation
will not be necessary.
As required by the Southwest Area Plan, the
applicant has designed the project to allow for the
future widening of an additional 25 feet on
Winchester Road.
Parkinq/Internal Circulation
The proposed project requires ~7 parking spaces.
The plot plan proposes 47 spaces and 1 loading
space.
Access to the site will be provided off of Winchester
Road via a shared driveway. The alley is not a
public dedication and will be privately maintained.
The internal site circulation plan provides adequate
space to comfortably drive through the project and
park.
Loading and unloading is a concern of Staff due to
the location of the loadin9 space. When the case
was transferred from the County, the site plan did
not provide any loadin9 spaces. The County
determined that a loadin9 space was not required
and was about to be approved at the County
Director's hearin9 as such. However, City Staff
feels that a loadin9 space is necessary and has
worked with the applicant to provide a loadin9
space. Since the project is not designed with rear
loadin9 doors, the only place available for a loadin9
space is in the center of the parkin9 lot. This
location may cause poor circulation durin9 periods
of loadin9 and unloadin9. Rear or side loadin9 will
require a complete redesign of the project.
Architectural Compatibility/Landscapin.q
The commercial/industrial park along theWinchester
corridor is a mixture of architectural styles ranging
from single story mediterranean to two story
concrete tilt-ups.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 3
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
The materials to be used in the proposed project
include stucco, glass, and concrete tile· The
primary color of the buildin9 will be a li9ht pink.
The concrete tile roof will be "S" shaped.
A focal point to the project is proposed at the
location on the site plan where the fountain is
indicated. This focal point is intended to add
interest and variety to the project. The focal point
shall be either a fountain or public art. A Condition
of Approval has been added to require the design
and location of the focal point to be approved by
Staff prior to the issuance of buildin9 permits.
The project site is designated LI (General Light
Industrial) by the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP)·
The proposed project is consistent with the general
policies of SWAP. It is anticipated that the project
as conditioned, will be consistent with the City's
forthcoming General Plan.
An Initial Study has been completed for the project
and a Negative Declaration is recommended for the
proposal.
Site Approval
The proposed use will have a substantial
adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. The project proposed
a commercial retail use with the surroundin9
properties bein9 office buildings. The
project does not provide sufficient parkin9 if
the showroom is converted this would
encourage use of adjoining properties for
necessary parkin9. I Amended)
The site for the proposed use has adequate
access.
The proposed project will not inhibit or
restrict future ability to use active or passive
solar energy systems.
The project will not have a significant
adverse effect on the environment.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 4
There is a reasonable probability that the
project will be inconsistent with the General
Plan once it is adopted, based on analysis in
the staff report. The project does not
provide sufficient parking for the site.
( Amended )
There is a probability that the project will not
deter, or interfere with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately
inconsistent with the new General Plan,
These findings are supported by staff
analysis, minutes, maps, exhibits, and
environmental documents associated with this
application and herein incorporated by
reference.
The lawful conditions stated in the approval
are deemed necessary to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan
No. 11609, ADOPT Resolution 90- , and
APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11609, Request for
Site Approval, based on the analysis and
findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
DP:ks
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Exhibits
3. Conditions Of Approval
4. I nitial Study
STAFFRPT\PP11609 5
RESOLUTION NO, 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 11609
TO CONSTRUCT AN 18,453 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL AND
FURNITURE SHOWROOM COMMERCIAL CENTER.
WHEREAS, Jeff Hardy & Associates filed Plot Plan No. 11609 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan applications were processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
pertaining to said Plot Plans on October 1, 1990, at which time interested persons
had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Rot Plans; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report
regarding the Plot Plans;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
la)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
(b) There is little or no probability of substantial
STAFFRPT\PP11609 1
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plans are consistent with the SWAP and
meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approvin9 projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
~a)
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 11609 proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
11 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan
requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law
STAFFRPT\PP11609 2
and City ordinances.
12) The overall development of the land is designed for
the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare;
conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible
with the present and future logical development of the
surrounding property.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plans
proposed conform to the logical development of its proposed site, and
are compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the
proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect on this case because the mitigation measures described on
attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project
and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot
Plan No. 11609 to construct an 18,453 square foot retail and furniture showroom
commercial center subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of October, 1990.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thered, held
on the 1st day of October, 1990 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\PP11609 3
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No. 11609.
DATED: By
~ame
Title
STAFFRPT\PP11609
::a::)V"ld UqJ. SgH:)NI~A
· ootey · XP'eH'IIeI'
.(
e,
u~
IU
U
_z
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No. 11609
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
This approval shall be used within two ~2 ) years of the Planning Commission
approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect
whatsoever. By this approval within the two {2) year period which is
thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following agencies shall provide
verification to the Building and Safety Department that all pertinent
Conditions of Approval and applicable have been met:
A. Planning Department
B. Temecula Union School District
C. Fire District
D. Engineering Department
E. Rancho California Water District
F. Department of Buildin9 and Safety
C. Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Services (DEHS)
H. CATV Franchise.
Architectural elevations of all proposed structures shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building
permits. The elevations shall substantially conform to those approved by the
Planning Commission.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall
submit seven (7) copies of perking, landscaping, shading and irrigation plot
plan to the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set
forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
15.
All site amenities, including landscaping and irrigation, as shown on plans
approved by the Planning Department, shall be installed prior to issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy. Landscaping shall utilize drought tolerant
landscaping wherever feasible. An automatic sprinkler system shall be
installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth
condition, planting within ten { 10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not
be permitted to grow higher than thirty {30) inches.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees
along the streets and within the parking areas.
The owner/developer shall agree to defend at his sole expense, any action
brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees because of the
issuance of such approval, or, in the alternative, to relinquish such approval.
The owner/developer shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers or
employees for any Court costs and attorney~s fees which the City, its agents
officers or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such
action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in
the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the
owner/developer of his obligations under this condition. (Amended)
Applicant shall submit the site plan as approved by the Planning Department
to the Department of Building and Safety concurrent with application for
building permits. The development of the premises shall conform substantially
with that as shown on Plot Plan No. 11759 or as amended by these conditions.
All parking stalls shall be clearly striped and permanently maintained with
double or hairpin lines on the surface of the facility.
Any lights used to illuminate the site shall be designed so as to reflect away
from adjoining properties and public thoroughfares. All street lights and
other outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655 and the Southwest Area Plan.
Signs shall be reviewed under separate application·
All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Riverside County Department
of Health Services prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 )
year, this approval shall become null and void.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 2
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate
fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by
the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution. Said fee shall not apply to the entire site, but rather to the new
building and parking structure.
Prior to issuance of buildin9 permits, performance securities, in amounts to
be determined by the Director of Buildin9 and Safety to guarantee the
installation of planrings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with
the Director of Buildin9 and Safety.
Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and
irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Buildin9 and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
A minimum of 47 parking spaces shall be provided, in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The parking area shall be
surfaced with aspbaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three (3)
inches on four 14) inches of Class II base.
A minimum of 2 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Each parking
space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or
equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not
be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior
end of the parking space at a minimum of height of 80 inches from the bottom
of the sign to the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign
shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street
parkin9 facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not
less than one 11 ) inch in height, which clearly and conspicuously states the
followin9:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense.
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parkin9 place shall
have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue
paint of at least three (3) square feet in size.
Commercial Units A and B shall be occupied by furniture, drapery, plumbing,
floor covering, and appliance stores only.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 3
22.
Commercial Units C through F shall not be occupied by restaurant tentants
unless additional parking is provided.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
23. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Plannin9 Department;
Engineerin9 Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise,
24.
Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains
shall be installed to City Standards.
25.
The developer shall submit four (4) copies of a soils report to the Engineerin9
Department, The report shall address the soils stability and 9eolagical
conditions of the site.
26.
The developer shall submit four (4) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineerin9 Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Buildin9 Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
27.
The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of
building permits.
28.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 4
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT
29.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
30.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
31.
The area shown as 30'x 50' ingress and egress on the Plot Plan shall be
improved with A.C. pavement to the same standards as the on-site parking lot
or as provided by the CC&R's already established for the site. (Amended)
Riverside County Department of Health
32. "Will-serve" letters from the water and sewering agencies.
33.
If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the
Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Branch (Jon
Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been
cleared for:
a. Underground storage tanks.
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Service.
c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185).
d. Waste reduction management.
Fire Department
34.
The fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance 546.
35.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3500 GPM
for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 5
36.
37.
38.
39.
43.
45.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants ( 6"x4"x2 1/2x2 1/2 ),
will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of
the buildin9 as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required
fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types,
location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements.
Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local
water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of
the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the
Riverside County Fire Department."
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process
to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in
fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow
of 1500 CPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the building( s) . A statement that the building(s) will
be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the
building plans.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
A statement that the building will be automatically fir sprinklered must appear
on the title page of the building plans.
Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code,
Section 503.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
Install a dust collecting system as per the Uniform Building Code, Section 908.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 6
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum
of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This
amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
Buildinq & Safety Department
50.
The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two (2)
weeks processing time to obtain all required clearances prior to the final
inspection.
Temecula Unified School District
51. This project is subject to State law requirements for School impact mitigation.
Eastern Municipal Water District
52. Any and all necessary regionally sized on-site and off-site gravity sewers and
appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force
mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot
lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers,
treatment, and effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to
EMWD regulations will be allowed.
Rancho California Water District
53.
The proposed project is located within the boundaries of Rancho California
Water District. Water service will be available to the site upon completion of
financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water
availability will be contingent upon the property owner signing and Agency
Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
Background
1. Name of Proponent:
Jeff Hardy & Associates
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
27620 Commerce Center Drive, ~103
Temecula, CA 92390
i714) 676-1415
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
August 9, 1990
4. Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMECULA
5. Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Plot Plan No. 11609
Location of Proposal:
North side of Winchester Road,
700 feet southwest of the
centerline of Jefferson Avenue.
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached
sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth· Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
X
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
STAFFRPT\PP11609 1
Yes Maybe No
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
ee
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, includin9, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or ground waters?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11609 2
Yes Maybe No
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life· Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
!ntroduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life· Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
I birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11609 3
Yes Maybe No
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare· Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset· Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticicles,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population· Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11609 4
Yes Maybe No
14.
15.
16.
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? __
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? __
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection? X
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X
f. Other governmental services: __
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? __
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? __
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11609 5
17.
18.
19.
20.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health· Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health ) ?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation· Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11609 6
Yes Maybe No
21.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future· )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? I A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
STAFFRPT\PP11609 7
Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
Earth
No. The proposed project will not result in cut and fill slopes.
Yes. All development disrupts the soil profile to some degree
and results in soil displacement, compaction and over-covering.
Further analysis will determine if additional mitigations are
required.
No. Development of the proposed project will not require
substantial grading.
No. There are no unique geologic or physical features on the
site.
Yes. Wind and water erosion potentials will increase during the
construction phase and remain high until disturbed areas are
replanted. The wind erosion impact is considered high and
significant but will be mitigated through minimal grading,
retention of natural vegetation whenever feasible, and use of
watering trucks and hydro-seeding disturbed areas after
grading.
No. There is no body of water near the project site which could
be affected by the proposed project.
Yes. The project site is located within a liquefaction and fault
hazard zone area according to the Riverside County General Plan
Geologic Hazard Map. A geologic report for the project should
address these potential issues.
Air
b-c,
Maybe. Depending upon the amount of traffic generated by the
project, an increase in carbon monoxide and particulate missions
will occur. This impact is not considered significant since the air
emissions from this project is only an incremental impact to the
area's air quality.
No. The proposed project should not create any objectionable
odors or alter the area's climate.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 8
Water
b-c,g.
~. a-d.
No. The proposed project will not affect any body of water.
No. The proposed project will increase the amount of
impermeable surfaces on the site which will reduce the amount of
water absorption. However, the introduction of irrigation to the
site will be off-set the water absorption rate. Drainage patterns
will continue to flow to the streets and channels.
No. The proposed project will not interfere with the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters.
No. The proposed project will not affect the public water supply
system.
Yes. The proposed project is within the Murrieta
CreekJTemecula Valley Area Drainage Plan and watershed area.
To help mitigate the project's impact, a flood mitigation charge
shall be paid.
No. Although the development of the site will remove any of the
plant species that currently exist on the site, no unique, rare or
endangered species should be affected. New species of plants
will be introduced to the site as part of the landscape
requirements for the project. The addition of the new species is
not considered a negative impact.
The site is not currently used for agricultural purposes.
Animal Life
5. a-c.
No. The proposed project is in an area that has been
experiencing urbanization for a number of years. It is
anticipated that the only animal life on or in the vicinity of the
site includes squirrels, rabbits, lizards, and other animals
common to the area. It is highly unlikely that an endangered
species habitats the site. The project site is within the
Stephen's Kangaroo Habitat fee area and will be subject to habitat
imitigation fees.
Noise
6. ao
be
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during
construction. Long-term noise impacts will occur due to
increased traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be
significant since the surrounding land uses are not noise
sensitive.
No. Severe noise will not be generated by the proposed project.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 9
Liqht and Glare
7.
Maybe· The proposed project is located within the Mt. Palomar
Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area which recommends the
use of low pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lights to help avoid
interference with the Mt. Palomar telescope known as "Skyglow".
The use of LPSV lights will reduce the light and glare produced
by the proposed project.
Land Use
8.
No. The surrounding land uses are commercial, office, and light
man ufact u ri n g.
Natural Resources
9. a-b.
No. The proposed use will not increase the consumption rate of
any natural or non-renewable natural resource.
Risk of Upset
10. a.
Maybe. If the manufacturing tenant uses any hazardous
materials in their operation, a list of hazardous substances and
disposal plan shall be submitted to the City.
No. During construction, it should not be necessary to close any
streets which would interfere with emergency vehicles. If street
or land closure is necessary, it shall be coordinated with the City
and Police Department.
Population
11.
No. The proposed project will generate some jobs but not a
significant amount to alter the area's population.
Housing
12.
No. The proposed project will not generate a significant number
of jobs to create a demand for additional housing.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 10
Transportation / Ci rcu lation
13. a,c.
Maybe. The proposed project will generate additional traffic to
and from the site. However, it is not anticipated that this
increase will be significant. The traffic that is generated by the
project may add an incremental impact to the Winchester Road/
1-15 interchange which is currently operating at capacity during
peak hours. This potential impact may be mitigated by a
transportation improvement mitigation fee.
Yes. The proposed project will require parking to support the
use. The project will need 47 parkin9 spaces. The proposed
plan illustrates spaces·
No. The proposed project will not alter the present patterns of
circulation.
No. The proposed project will not affect waterborne, rail or air
traffic.
Yes. Any increase in traffic will increase the potential hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians.
Public Services
14. a,b,e.
c,d,f.
Yes. The proposed project will require public services in the
areas of police, fire, maintenance of roads, and public facilities.
This impact is not considered significant. The incremental
impact should be evaluated and the appropriate fees assessed.
Property taxes should mitigate the impact and continuing need
for services over the long term.
No. The project should not have a substantial effect on these
public services.
Enerqy
15. a-b.
No. The proposed project will not result in the substantial use
or increase in demand of fuel or energy.
Utilities
16. a-f.
No. The proposed project requires the use of utilities but will
not require substantial alteration to the exitin9 systems.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 11
Human Health
17 a-b.
Maybe. If hazardous substances are stored in the warehouse,
then that may create a potential health hazard. If hazardous
materials will be warehoused at the site, a plan for their use and
disposal should be submitted to the City.
Aesthetics
18.
No. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vista open
to the public. The elevations of the proposed project are
consistent in architectural materials as the surrounding
buildings.
Recreation
19.
No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses.
Cultural Resources
20. a-d.
No. The subject site has previously been mass graded and it is
unlikely that the project will result in the destruction of a
prehistoric or historic archaeological site. If a site is
discovered, an archaeologist or paleontologist should be called on
site to supervise the digging and determine if the site is
significant. The proposed project will not impact any building of
historic significance, affect unique ethnic cultural values or
restrict sacred uses.
Mandatory Findinqs of Siqnificance
21. a-c.
No. The proposed project will not significantly affect the natural
environment, have long term environmental impacts or have
considerable cumulative impacts.
Maybe. If the proposed use warehouses hazardous materials, the
project may cause a health hazard to human beings and wildlife.
If hazardous materials are to be warehoused at the project, a
plan for their use and disposal should be developed and approved
by the City. The project may also have a substantial impact on
the existing transportation system. To mitigate the potential
impact at the Winchester Road/I-15 Interchange, a traffic
mitigation fee should be paid.
STAFFRPT\PP11609 12
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
X
For CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFFRPT\PP11609 13
ITEM NO.
12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 30, 1990
Change of Zone No. 571~
Conditional Use Permit No. 30~6
PREPARED BY: Mark Rhoades
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Arco Products Company
Tait and Associates
Change of Zone from M-SC to C-1/C-P and a
Conditional Use Permit to extend an existing
canopy.
Northwest corner of Winchester Road and Jefferson
Avenue.
M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service Commercial )
North: C-1 / C-P
South: C-1/C-P
East: C-P-S
West: C-1/C-P
I General Commercial )
I General Commercial )
(Scenic Highway
Commercial )
I General Commercial )
C-1/C-P (General Commercial)
Mini-Mart and Gasoline Service
STAFFRPT\CZ5714 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
ANALYSIS:
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
North: Shopping Center
South: Shopping Center
East: Commercial
West: Office
Number of Acres: .97 acres
Buildings: 1
This project was approved by the County of
Riverside Planning Commission on June 6, 1990. As
it exists the gasoline and mini-mart are an existing
non-conforming use in the M-SC zone. The
applicant has applied for the Change of Zone to
bring the project into zoning conformance. The
Conditional Use Permit is an application to extend
both pump islands and to extend the existing
canopy.
The existing use is an Arco Mini-mart and gas
station with the concurrent sale of beer and wine.
The site currently supports a store area and two ( 2 )
pump islands. The proposed addition would be an
18 foot long northern extension to the canopy, and
four (4) pumps.
Zoninq
The existing zonin9 is M-SC (Manufacturin9 -
Service Commercial). Gasoline stations and mini-
marts are not a permitted use in this zone. The
applicant has applied for a change to C-I/C-P
(General Commercial) which would bring the use
into conformance. It is Staff's recommendation,
however, that the zone be changed instead to C-P-S
{ Scenic Highway Commercial ) because of the
proximity to Interstate 15. The C-P-S zone would
also bring the existing use into conformance.
The SWAP designation for this project is "C",
Commercial. The County Commission struck road
conditions pertaining to the additional right-of-way
on Winchester Road. The City Engineering
Department is now requiring this condition for
additional right-of-way according to SWAP. With
the additional right-of-way on Winchester Road, the
project will be consistent with the Southwest Area
Plan.
STAFFRPT\CZ5714 2
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
Environmental Assessment Number 34252 was
adopted by the County Commission· The Initial
Study addressed concerns regarding fault hazards,
liquefaction, ground shaking, traffic and
circulation. All concerns have been mitigated to
non-significance·
Conditional Use Permit No. 3046
The proposed use conforms to the objectives
of the City's General Plan·
The proposed use will not adversely affect
the adjoining land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which it is to be
located.
The size and shape of the site proposed for
the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner
not detrimental to the particular area nor to
the peace, health, safety and general
welfare.
The traffic generated by the proposed use
will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved
to carry the traffic in the area, and that
adequate parking is provided.
The granting of the Conditional Use Permit
under the conditions imposed will not be
detrimental to the peace, health and safety
and general welfare of the citizens of the City
of Temecula.
Chanqe of Zone 5714
The proposed C-1/CP zone designation is not
appropriate because of the projects proximity
to an eligible scenic highway·
The C-P-S zoning proposed by Staff is
appropriate because of the projects proximity
to an eligible scenic highway.
The proposed use conforms to the objectives
of the City's General Plan.
STAFFRPT\CZ5714 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed use will not adversely affect
the adjoining land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which it is to be
located.
The granting of the Change of Zone under
the conditions imposed will not be detrimental
to the public health and safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City of
Temecula.
DENIAL of CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5714 from M-SC
to C-1 ]CP in accordance with the findings contained
in the attached staff report; but
APPROVAL of CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5714 from
M-SC to C-P-S in accordance with the findings
contained in the attached Staff Report; as follows:
Read by title only, waive further reading and
introduce an ordinance entitled
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF
SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION CONTAINED IN
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 5714,
CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-SC
{MANUFACTURING - SERVICE
COMMERCIAL) TO C-P-S ISCENIC HIGHWAY
COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA
ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 79.
APPROVAL of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3046
based on the attached findings and subject to the
attached conditions of approval.
MR:ks
Attachments:
Additional Conditions of Approval
County Staff Report dated June 6, 1990
Exhibits
Conditions of Approval
I nitial Study
Ordinance
Resolution
STAFFRPT\CZ5714 4
Notice of Public Hearinf
THE CITY OF TF. aMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92390
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the
matter(s) described below.
Case No: Change of Zone 5714/Conditional Use Permit 3046
Applicant: Arco Products
Location: Northwest Comer of Winchester and Jefferson
Proposal: Expand existing facility, change of Zone from M-SC to GI/GP
Environmental
Action: Negative Declaration
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing(s) or may
appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The
proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula City
Hall, 43180 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM.
Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Mark Rhodes, City of Temecula
Planning Department (714) 694-6400
PLACE OF HEARING
DATE OF HEARING
TIME OF HEARING:
,/ .
.r' \
Temecula Community Center
28816 Pujol Street
Temecula
Tuesday, October 30. 1990
7:00 PM
iitGr:nii:
· ·
Vicinty Map
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit No. 30~6
Council Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Plannlnq Department
1. No additional signage shall be allowed.
This conditional use permit shall be subject to Planning commission review
every two (2) years. The permit shall remain active until such time as the
Planning Commission determines that the use is not in conformance with the
approved Conditions of Approval.
The conditional use permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 18.30 of
Ordinance 3z~8.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit·
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3046. The City of Temecula will promptly
notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails
to cooperate fully in the defence, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two ~2) years of approval date; otherwise
it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use is meant the
beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the
two 12 ) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the
beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit 1, or as amended by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one { 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null and void·
STAFFRPT\CZ571~ 1
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed on-site so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
Enqineerincl Department
10.
County Road Condition No. I shall be amended to delete the words "and
Winchester Road".
11.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated {assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
STAFFRPT\CZ571~ 2
Zoning Area: Temecula
Supervisorial District:
E.A. Number: 34252
Regional Team No.: 5
First
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5714
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3046,Amd.i3
Planning Con~nission: 6-6-90
Agenda Item No.: 5-2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
1. Applicant:
2. Engineer/Rep.:
3. Type of Request:
4. Location:
5. Existing Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
9. Comprehensive General Plan:
10. Agency Recommendations:
11. Letters:
Arco Products Company
Tait and Associates
Change of zone from M-SC to C-1/C-P
Addition of pump island
Northwest corner of Winchester Road
Jefferson
M-SC
M-SC, C-P-S, C-1/C-P
Existing Arco mini-mart gasoline station
Commercial Retail and office development
Land Use Designation: "C" - Commercial
Open Space/Cons: Areas Not Designated
See Letters Dated:
Transportation: 6-~6-gG 6-6-90*
*(Amended per P.C. 6-6-90}
Health: 5-29-90*
Flood: 5-19-90'
Fire: 5-25-90*
Building & Safety - Grading: 5-30-90*
Building & Safety - Land Use: 5-8-90*
B~i~dimg & &a~e~y - P~am Gkeek:
Opposing/Supporting:
and
12. Sphere of Influence:
Within City of Temecula
ANALYSIS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Change of Zone No. 5714 and Conditional Use Permit No. 3046, Amd. No. 3 are
proposals to change the zone on the subject parcel from M-SC to C-1/C-P and add
an additional pump island to an existing mini-mart gasoline station. The
project is located at the northwest corner of Jefferson Avenue and Winchester
Road in the City of Temecula.
BACKGROUND
The applicant has requested a structural modification to an existing
non-conforming use. In order to bring the existing use into conformance with
Ordinance 348, Section 18.B{a), the applicant was required to apply for a
change of zone from M-SC to C-1/C-P which allows gasoline service stations and
the concurrent sales of beer and wine with a conditional use permit. {See
attahced letter from Riverside County Planning Department dated 11-16-B9)
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5714
COMDZTZONAL USE PERNZT NO. 3046, AMENDED
Staff Report
Page 2
LAND USE AND ZONING
The current land use is an existing Arco gasoline service station and
mini-mart. Surrounding the project are various types of commercial uses
including retail. services and office uses.
Zoning on the property is M-SC with a proposed change to C-1/C-P. Staff
recommends a change from M-SC to C-P-S. A change of zone to C-P-S would be
consistent with the eligible scenic highway designation of Interstate 15
located to the east of the project. Surrounding zoning includes C-P-S to the
east, C-1/C-P to the north, M-SC to the south and west.
GENERAL PLAN
The project site is located within the City of Temecula. The Southwest Area
Co,..unity Plan land use map designates the property is "C" - C~,..ercial. The
proposed change of zone and addition of a pump island to an existing gasoline
station are compatible with surrounding zoning and uses. Therefore, the
project is consistent with the General Plan.
ENVIRONMENI'AL ASSESS)lENT
The intial study prepared for Environmental Assessment 34252 indicated that the
primary environmental concerns are geologic fault hazards, liquefaction,
groundshaking, traffic and circulation. However, all these concerns can be
mitigated to a level of non-significance at development stage.
FINDINGS
1. Change of Zone No. 5714 is an application to change the existing M-SC
zoning to C-1/C-P.
2. Conditional Use Permit No. 3046 is an application to add a pump island to
and existing gasoline station.
3. The location of the project is within the City of Temecula at the
northwest corner of Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue.
4. Change of Zone No. 5714 and Conditional Use Permit No. 3046 are required
to bring and existing use into conformance with Ordinance 348.
5. Current land use is an existing gasoline station and mini-mart.
_ ,6. Commercial land uses surround the project site.
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5714
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3046, AMENDED t3
Staff Report
Page 3
Zoning on the subject property is M-SC with M-SC, C-1/C-P and C-P-S
surrounding the site.
8. The site is located within the SWAP, with a "C" - Con~nercial designation.
g. Environmental concerns have been mitigated to a level of non-significance.
10. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with
the General Plan proposal being studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
11. There is little or no probability of substantial
interference with the future adopted general plan if
ultimately inconsistent with the General Plan.
detriment to or
the project i s
12. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of State law
and 1 ocal ordinances.
RECOe~HENDATIONS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 34252
based on the findings that the proposed project will not have a significant
effect on the environment; and,
DENIAL of CHANGE OF ZONE 5714 from M-CS to C-1/C-P in accordance with Exhibit
2, and,
APPROVAL of CHANGE OF ZONE 5714, from M-SC to C-P-S as shown on Exhibit 4; and,
APPROVAL of CONDITIONAL USE PER)4IT NO. 3046, AMD. No. 3 based on the findings
and conclusions found within the staff report and subject to the attached
conditions of approval.
JHR:Jg
5/22/90
i CZ 5714 / CU 5046
VAC
VA
VA
YAC
I LAND USE
ING'
I I
CENTER
' I !
I ~.
1 '-200'
Rd, Bk. Ri-55-CDete 05/16/90 Drawn By RG./,4'4T./
R[VEItSO E COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATIOtVAL ,MAP
J CZ 5714 / CU ,~046
M-SC
M'~-SC
RECOMMENDED ZONING
I 4
Clmm pm
M-SC
C-1/C-P
C-P-S
C
:-p
200'
C-P-S
ARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY
M-SC TO C-I/C-P
TEMECULA
k,~essor's Bk.
' C-1/C-P
A~Op. ~% LO~CATIONAL MAP
Use ~ ~
Area Sup. Dist. I ST "" ~"~ ,~
Sec. 35 T.7 S.,R. 3 W. 909 Pg. 28
Circulation i~ WINCHESTER RD.-URBAN.ARTERIAL-I;~4'
Element JEFFERSON AVE. MAJOR I10' :
ltd. Elk. Pg.55-CDate 05/16/90 Drawn By RG./~'~/t:Z:Y_ ,~
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NO SC,,LE ~ ~ "
CZ 5714 / CU :5046
....
I 5
./\
\\
// /
App. ~F.,O I:~DUCTS COMI>ANY ' ' ' LOCAT#O~VAL MAP
~ ~t~A Sup.Dist. I ST
~. ~T.7~SW. ~.ss~'s ~. 909 ~. 28
~~ ~ WINCHESTB ~.-URBAN.ARTERIAL~4'
~t ~FFE~N A~. MAJOR I10'
1'- 2~' ~~ ~ ~NNING ~RTMENT .o SCALE
PARCEL NO.IJ09-281-C) 1
';SLAND ADDITION
/'.RCO Products Company
..,.,,.....,,,,.. o.~,.:;:";':,;;';;';=;~;;
1055 West S0vonlh St.
P.O. Box 2570, Lee Angelos, CA 90051.0570
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Atlantic Richfield Co.
P.O. Box 6411
Artesia, CA 90702
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3046, AMD. ~3
Project Description: Addition of pump
island
Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-281-017
District/Area: Temecula
9
The use hereby pemitted is for
existing Arc· AM/PM mini-mart station
Number 909-281-017.
an addition of a pump island to an
located within Assessor's Parcel
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside or its agents, officers, and employees frcrn any claim, action,
or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3046, AJqD No. 3. The County of
Riverside will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action,
or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in
the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside.
This approval shall be used within two {2} years of approval date;
otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A, AMD No. 3, or as amended by these
condi ti ons.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one
{1} year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Transportation Department letter dated 5-15-90, a
copy of which is attached.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department
transmittal dated 5-29-90, a copy of which is attached.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control District transmittal dated 5-19-90, a copy of which is
attached.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3046, AMD. NO. 3
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
11.
13.
14.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate
section of Ordinance 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated
5-25-90, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the
Department of Building and Safety - Land
5-8-90, a copy of which is attached.
recommendations set forth in the
Use Section transmittal dated
The applicant shall comply with
Department of Building and Safety -
5-30-90, a copy of which is attached.
the recommendations set forth in the
Grading Section transmittal dated
A minimum of seventeen (17) parking spaces shall be provided in accordance
with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Seventeen (17)
parking spaces shall be provided as sh ~/n on the Approved Revised Exhibit
A, AMD. ~3. The parking area shall be surfaced with (asphaltic concrete
paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base.)
(decomposed granite compacted to a minimum thickness of three (3) inches
treated with not less than ½ gallon per square yard of penetration coat
oil, followed within six months by an application of ¼ gallon per square
yard of seal coat oil.
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of
accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
A minimum of one (1) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown
on Exhibit A, AMD No. 3. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped
shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign
constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the
International SyTnbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the
parking space at a minimum height of BO inches from the bottom of the sign
to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36
inches fron the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign
shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the
off-street parkin facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size
with lettering nol h inch , and
t an 1 in hei
less ght which clearly
conspicuously states the following:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3046, AMD. No. 3
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed
away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning ."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the synbol of
accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain
clearance and/or permits fr~ the following agencies:
Transportation Department
Environmental Health
Piverside County Flood Control
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division
of the Department of Building and Safety.
Roof-Mounted equipment shall be shielded fron ground view.
material shall be subject to Plannino Department approval.
Screenino
One (1) trash enclosure which is adequate to enclose a total of one
bin shall be centrally located within the project, and shall be
constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure
shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and an
opaque gate which screens the bins frcm. external view.
This project site is within a significant groundshaking zone. Hitigation
shall be the application of the proper Uniform Building Code standards in
the development of this project.
All existing structures on the subject property shall conform to all the
applicable requirements of Ordinance 348.
20.
This approval shall beccme null and void on June 6, ~ 2015.
per P.C. 6-6-90}.
(Amended
Prior to any use allowed by this use, the applicant shall obtain clearance
from the Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section that the
uses found on the subject property are in conformance with Ordinance No.
348.
jHR:jg
5/22/90
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
|van F. Tennan!
ACTING ROAD COMMISSIONER &. COL'NTY SL'RX,'E'~OR
,June 6, 1990
· '~aT - 1'5",- -~t 90
COUNT~ .,,DttlNISTIL~,.TI',.E CENTER
MAILING .*,DDRE.~,S
PO BOX
RIVERSIDE C~,LIFOR\IA
1714,
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
(Service Station & Mini-Market)
RE: CU 3046 - Amend #3
Team 5 - SMD #9
A9 #111-111-111-9
· As amended at P.C. 6-6-90
With respect to the conditions of approval for the
referenced exhibit, the Transportation Department recommends that
the applicant provide the following street improvements, street
improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement S~andards
(Ordinance 461). It is understood that the exhibit correctly
shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses
with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability
may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration.
These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts
and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though
occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement.
All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall
be referred to the Transportation Planning and Development Review
Division Engineer's Office.
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this
permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at
no cost to any government agency:
No additional right of way shall be required on Jefferson
Avenue aM W~nches~ .R~ since adequate right of way
exists.
*2.
* As deleted at P.C. 6-6-90
** As amended at P.C. 6-6-90
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER · 4080 LEMON STREET · RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
CU 3046 - Amend #3
Mey-~6~-~ggg- june 6, 1990
Page 2
An additional 25 foot transportation easement dedicated to
the County shall be required on State Highway 79
(Winchester Road) in accordance with the Southwest Area
Plan as Board approved.
The traffic signal mitigation has been met on this project.
It was paid 5-17-88 in the sum of $2,900.00 by PP 10118.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the
applicant shall construct the following at no cost to any
government agency:
**5.
No additional road improvements will be required at this
time on Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road.
*6.
*7.
*B.
~=J'cendard- -3-5 - -'foot -etur)9- - i-e t:z'n-,- -cress- - -g~t tet-,- -spaf~k'e} -and- -
=tees s- - T~mpS- - ~h~} t- - be - -e onet-Tue tee - -~n - - ecco~a~De - -w i~4~ -
~in~ ,6 i- ~ - a~a~e.-
*9.
*10.
*11.
12.
~ -appt-i4ant- - ~,hal I- - ~xx~s~r~c~ - -a - - ~4x~; - - (oo~ - -wi~ 4a ise~ -
Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section
11.1.
* As deleted at P.C. 6-6-90
** As ended at P.C. 6-6-90
CU 3046 - Amend #3
May-~%~-~g9~- June 6, 1990
Page 3
13.
All work done within County right of way shall have an
encroachment permit.
14.
All driveways shall
County Standards
improvement plans.
conform to
and shall
the applicable Riverside
be shown on the street
15.
All entrance driveways shall be channelized with concrete
curb and gutter to prevent "back-on" parking and interior
drives from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum
distance of 35 feet measured from face of curb.
'16.
20.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Transportation Department standards and require
approval by the Transportation Planning and Development
Review Division Engineer and assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Transportation Planning and
Development Review Division Engineer. Landscape plans shall
be submitted on standard County Plan sheet format (24" x
36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted with the street
* As deleted at P.C. 6-6-90
** As amended at P.C. 6-6-90
CU J046 - AmenO #3
May-iB~-i99G--June 6, 1990
Page 4
improvement plans and shall depict only such landscaping,
irrigation and related facilities as are to be placed
within the public road rights-of-way.
Lawrence A. Toerpe'~
Divis ion Engineer
L T: Jw
FROM:
RE:
County of Riverside
OEPAI:tTMENT OF HEALTH
DO4q.GAJ~201~, 11
T0:
FliOM:
lIE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DATE:
F~ I VER$ IDE COUNTY F'LANN I NG DEPT.
jLT~FN: JT~n Ch~I u
g~ ~ I~'Z~IRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST IV
CONDITIONIL USE PERMIT 3045
09-22-e9
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Conditional
Use Permit 3046 and has no oblections. Sanitary sewer and
water services are available in this area. Prior to any
bulldlno plan aDoroyal, the followlnq items will be
submitted:
Final "will-serve" letters frc. m the rarer and
severln~ aoencles.
Three comolete sets of mlan~ for each foc, d
establishment will be suDmltted. lncludinc
a fixture schedule. a finish schedule. and
a Dlumblna schedule in order to ensure
comDllance with the California Uniform Retail
Food Facilities.
A c!q~C~q~ letter from the Environmental Health
Services Hazardous Materials Mana~emen~ 5ranch
(3on Mohoroskl ~714~ ~58-5055}. will be resulted
lndlcatlno that the Dro~ect has been cleared fc, r:
a. Underoround storaoe tanks.
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordan.-_e
with AB 21~5)
d. Waste reduction manaqement.
SM:tac
cc: Jon Mohoroskl, Hazardous Materials Branch
KENNETH L EDWARD$
1995 MARKET .~,TR'EET
I~O BOX ~033
TELEPhOnE 1714 79"7-20!5
FAX NO !7'~4 788-9g~5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RiVER.c,,tDE. CALHrC~I~NIA 92502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional c~eam No.
P1 anner ~//~
Area:
Re:
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
~//The District's report dated/~- xTx-/~>~ is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~av/hb~e~r°ject will be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
cc:
:ry~~u~,
?OHN H. ICASHUBA
~enior Civil Engineer
KENNETH L EDWARDS
lg95 MARKET 5TRE,.ET
P.O. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE (714} 787-2015
FAX NO, (`/14} '/88-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention:
Area:
Regional Team No.
P1 anner .~/~/
Re: CuP
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered fre,' from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude co ld cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable < jinances.
The topography of the area consists of ,,~ell defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property, There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building site:. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstruct'~cns in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to 'Fevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environ'lental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by ete.vating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be 'paid i, accordance with the applicable riles and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to th~ ~roposed minor change.
J/x~This project is a part of ~x/ /,F22-2 The project will be
free of ordinary storm flood h :~ d when improvements ~ave been constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
"v/x'The attached comments apply.
;enior Civil Engineer
)AT E: C::) ,,-'t' '9 & t R 6 9
Th County
Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of
collecting drainage fees. Those fees are used to construct
needed flood control facilities within the particular area. The
Area Drainage Plan fees apply to new land divisions and other
types of new development.
Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff.
These increases are particularly troublesome in those watersheds
where an Area Drainage Plan has been adopted. In order to miti-
gate the downstream impacts brought about by increased runoff,
the District recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans
and Public Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation
charge. Mitigation charges, where appropriate, will be similar
to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate.
Following is the District's recommendation:
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall
equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied
by the area of new development. The new development in this
case include~total of /9, ~ 7 acres. At the current
a ~ . The charge is payable to the Flood
Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full
Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
" Mitigation Charge
(mitcharg)
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
46-209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405
INDIO, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WiTH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN 3. NEXVMAN
FIRE CHIEF
5-25-90
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
3760 12TH STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 925CI
(714) 787-6606
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JOHN RISTOW
CONDITIONAL USE PEP&lIT 3046 - A~IENDED 3
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
2. The existing water mains and fire hydrants will provide sufficient fire
protection for the proposed project.
3. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
4. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipx;ent.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
ama
April 4, 1990
Administrative Office · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
De art ~.:"VERSIDECOUNTY
Riverside County Planning p ~ ~NING D~PA~TMENT
Attention: JOhn Chiu
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Conditional Use Permit 3046, Exhibit A, Amended No.~\
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department
the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division
concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review.
Prior to issuanze of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B,
per Ordinance 655.
Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety
review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning
Department must be attached.
Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping
may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval.
Prior to the issuance of building'permits, written clearance
is required from the following:
· Temecula Valley Unified School District
Sincerely,
,/,/'/,~ ~' ',,,,,, ~:.J,
Vaughn Sarkis ian
Land Use Technician
VS:sn
DATE:
APN:
PLANNING / jOHN RISTO~j
SAM D. GONZAL~Z
MAY 30, 1990
CU 30~6 AMENDMENT ~ 3
939-281-017
The 'Grading Sestlon" has po cOr,:er: or, '~.~s p='c;:~::.
:IiVL t iDE COUn .u
PLAnninG DEP, RCrnEnC
November 16, 1989
Ms. Lynn Beteag
ARCO Real Estate Representative
28762 Rancho Del Lago
Laguna Niguel, Ca 92656
Dear Ms. Beteag:
This letter is to confirm our conversations, both in person and by telephone,
that your Conditional Use Permit No. 3046 was mistakenly accepted by our Public
Information Section.Per Section 11.2.6. (2}c that your gasoline service station
with a mini-mart which including the sale of beer and wine for off-premises
consumption is a non conforming use within the M-SC zone. Furthen~ore, Section
186.a of the Zoning Ordinance 348 specifies that "Any nonconforming structure
or use may continued and maintained for the periods of time hereafter set
forth, provided there are no structural alteration except as hereinafter
allowed. - - -"
In order to proceed with your Conditional Use Permit application, you would
need to file a change of zone application from M-SC zone to C-1/C-P or C-P-S
zone.
Also, I am enclosing the following documents for your legal department to
review.
1. Article IX (C-1/C-P Zone), Article IXb (C-P-S Zone), and Article Xi (~-SC
Zone) of Ordinance No. 348.
2. Section 11.2.6(2)C of Ordinance No. 348 was amended by the County Board of
Supervisors on April 4, 1989.
3. Section 18.8.a of Ordinance No. 348.
I hope these information will help you to proceed with your project.
there be any questions, please feel free to call me at (714} 787-6356.
Should
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director
John C iu, Planner III
Enclosures
4080 Ll~6ft STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
./
DATE: February 27, 1990
TO: Assessor
Surveyor - Ken Teich
Road Departmentt,/'
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service- Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Eastern Municipal Water District - Sewer
Rancho California Water District
Southern California Edison - Doug Davies
Southern California Gas
Caltrans #8
Temecula Union School District
Elsinore Union School District
RiVER3iDE courlE,u
PLAIlfiiI1G DEPaR !TIEn
Commissioner Turner
County Shertf~
Community Plans
' I
RIVERSIDE COUNT',,
ROAD DEPARTMENT
CHANGE OF ZONE 5714 - (Tm 5) - E.A. 34252
- Atlantic Richfield Company c/o Lynn
Beteag - Tait & Associates, Inc. -
Temecula Area - First Supervisorial
District - W of Jefferson Ave., S'ly of
Winchester Rd. - M-SC Zone - .97 Acre -
REQUEST: Change Zone from M-SC to C-1/C-P
- RELATED CASE: CUP 3046 - Mod 119 - A.P.
909-281-017
Please review the case described above, along with the
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for
clears, it will then go to public hearing.
attached case map. A Land
March 19, 1990. If it
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to March 19, 1990 in order that we
may include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
John Chiu at 275-3207.
Planner
'//-
PLEASE print na~ and title //3-/~'
PHONE:
gm
4080 LEMON STREET, 9"" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
County of Riverside
O: R~veratde county P]anning Department DATE: March 19, 1990
ATTN: John Chiu
FRO.~Gre~ Dellenbach, Environmental Health Specialist III
RE: Change of Zone 5714 - Revise (FAST TRACT)
Environmental Health Services has reviewed this change of zone
case and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services
are available in this area.
GD:wdl
MhR 2 0 1990
RiVERSiDE COUNTY
pLANNING DEPARTMENT
KENNETH L EDWARDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AN
water CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
P1 anning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No.
P1 anner ZT~, ~,~ '
1995 MARKET STREET
P O BOX 1033
TELEPHONE ~714' 787-2015
FAX NO (714' '/88-9965
MAR g 1 1990
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING i")EPARTMENT
Area
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum oF
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provide~
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable riles and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~av:hb~e~r°ject will be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
V r~ truly yours,
/ OHN H. tLASHUBA
or Civil Engineer
DATE: /~,c'~' ,/"'/."~
,/ =--/
DATE: February 27, 1990
FO: Assessor
Surveyor - Ken Teich
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection ¢
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Eastern Municipal Water District - Sewer
Rancho California Water District
Southern California Edison - Doug Dayies
Southern California Gas
Caltrans ~8
Temecula Union School District
Elsinore Union School District
::IiVE::IbiDE councv
PL, nnin6 DEPa,::IEITIEn;
RECE%VED
CHANGE OF ZONE 5714 - (Tm 5) - E.A. 34252
- Atlantic Richfield Company c/o Lynn
Beteag - Tait & Associates, Inc. -
Temecula Area - First Supervisorial
District - W of Jefferson Ave., S'ly of
Winchester Rd. - M-SC Zone - .97 Acre -
REQUEST: Change Zone from M-SC to C-1/C-P
- RELATED CASE: CUP 3046 - Mod 119 - A.P.
909-281-017
Please review the case described above, along with the
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for
:lears, it will then go to public hearing.
attached case map. A Land
March 19, 1990. If it
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to March 19, 1990 in order that we
may include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
john Chiu at 275-3207.
Planner
COMMENTS:
The Riverside County Fire Department has no comments or conditions.
DATE: 3-16-90 SIGNATURE
PLEASE print name and title
PHONE:
gm
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46'209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342'8277
:li , i:t iDE counc,u
PLAnnin(; DEPA:tEITIErlC
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
2-7-90
r~ CHANGE OF ZONE NO ~ PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO
~ CONDITIONAL USE ~ TRACT MAP NO
PERMIT NO ~ TEMPORARY USE PERMrl: NO
"" PARCEL MAP NO
~ VARIANCE NO
I~ PLOT PLAN NO
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
A APPLICANT INFORMATION
1. Apphcant'S Name
Mailing A0ClreS5
Telephone No: *
2 Owners Name
Marerig AclOreSs
Telephone Nc
3 Representative
Malhng A~Clress
Telephone No
Atlantic Richfield
P.O. Box 6411, Artasia.
{ 714 ) 643-1751
Same
Com;anv/Contac;; Lynn ~etea:
Col ifOrnia
(a&m-SDml
(a&m-Epm~
Tait & Associates. :no.
3.N.Eckhoff StreetS.. C, ran;~ Cal:=nr~,i~
~ , ~,~ - ..
( 714 ) E34-4RC~. (8 a m -5
NOTE :If more lha,~ One DenSOn i$ involveO ,n the Ownership Of the proi:)e~ly be,ng 0eve~opec a SeDa~a'.e page must De
Ittachec to this 8pphCahon which liStS the names and Idaleases of at, ~rSon$ havinG an ~me.es: r the ownershog o~
the proDe~y
B PROJECT INFORMATION
Purpose ofReauest(0escnDe proJecl)(Ordmance 348ref no)
Change Zone N-SO to C-1/C-P on~.
For existing AM/PM Mini Mart with Gasoline Sales & Off-site Beer,,",,ire Sales
2. Relied cases f,ecl in conjunchon w~th th:s request. C.U.P. = 3046
C INtOPEltrY INFORMATION
1. AIIIIIOtIParCelN(XS)- 90g-28~-017-7
2. General Iocltion (street I{tclrall. etc.)
4~555 WincheSter Rd., Temecula
-~ ~..
3. Section Undefined -~-~ Tovfrtlhip 7S Range 3W
4. AiX>roximate Gross Acreage: .97 Ac re
5. L~iI ~npti~ ~iw e~ ~ll ~pti~ is rKo~ m ~e ~ ~ t~ Coun~ RKOr~r) M~ ~ i~ac~ed
S:~ ATTAS=E3.
,,LZ:7'j:::':" "" ,o. ,=.., ._:
4080 LEMON STREET, 9" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
(7t4~ 787-6~81
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIF'ORNIA 9220~
~6191 342-8277
REQUIRED PROPERTY OWNERI NOTIFICATION INFORM/AT'ION
&PPLICATION$ FOR:
IN&IqCEL MAPS
IRACTS
ZONE CMAN~ES
CONDITIONAL U~E ImERMP!I
~BLIC ~ KRMITS
~RFACE MINING
~ND ENEMY ~RSI~
TI~ fOtlOwif~ leq ell I~ IIQu,m{I It ~ tm.~, ~ fil.'s~ el' IN m neqe mm NMlisctti~nl:
q. tWO .ee.l.c~r m~es le tw ifse~lecl i,~ mM~te I~" x 1;~"N~i~ ee~l Them levies ~vl ,~u~e the
~ ' ~. Inl ~1 .)
The llx:Ne n~H IPHofl~lt,O~ rely t)~ {~tlsf~q Oy COnllChr~ I tlt~e insurance comH,~y m the R,vlq..~l County I,ea
PROPER TY 0 WNERI CER TIFICA TION
1. Alain Bally __ , ce~,fy met on 2/5/90
ft~emMlcM, clproDeftyew,~e~hslwllprepetecll~y Alain Ball}'
I~JPlulm to aCl~lscl1.~ f~:luirerhef~tl fur.,she~ ~y fhe R,~,~ C~e~ P~i.g DoCUmenT k~ hit ,l I ~p,ete I-: ,. ~e
~l~tlO~ Of ~RIF ~ me luMci ~y i~ III ~hlt pr~y ~Nq w~hi~ ~ feet of the pr~N~ ;nvo~eC m the a ;~: a
I l~t ~ h~ t~ mlOtqtiOR fhd ~ I~1 I~ CO~t tO t~ NIt Of my k~le~l, I Mn~tl~g t~l s~O--Kt O' e-c~e: .~
NAME:
I'ITI. EI IIE(IIITIMTION
ADDRESS
IsHONE:
IIGNATUFIE:
DATE:
Alain Bally
511 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Suite 334
Glendale, CA 91202
21 .5902
:IiVE iDE co urlc.v
PhinrlinG DEP ICrnEnC
APPLICATION FOR LAND UIE AND DEVELOPMENT
PUBL¢ USE P'ERMrT NO
TRACT MAP NO
TEMIK)RARY USE PERkArT NO
VARIANCE NO.
INCOM Pt, E'TE APPLICATIONS WILl,, NOT BE AC;CER'ED.
AJNm'IJCAIfr INFORMATION
1. AIX~Qfirl Nlme:
Telephone No:
Owners Name
Mailsfig A00rels
Tlllphofie NO ·
Rlptlll~llt~ve
( 7/"'t ) G~'~"i"'?C:I
PROJECT INFORMATION
I PurDcile of ReQuest (tiescribe project) (OrClir~lnce $48 re(no) ~,,~c~e_._%'t' t v ,,, 't _ : - ,-~ ,.-~
· ,J
Rellte{Ifleeifileclm¢~nj~rttmeetmtl~emQ~em:
IROleERT'T INFORMATION
-,
fk. LegeldleC:~lOtveexlCtilOlldelC~dl}ti~eIM'f141XGl~ileNOWCeOlgteC(l~N'YRe;0~ler).Meybelttlche~
~-/
I~NATURE OF PRO~R'I'Y OWNERS)
4C~0 LEMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR 46-209 OASIS STIREEl', ROOM 3C~
RIVFR~,I~I= ~lf itf~QkJfa ~,e,n'q.l¢&? INDIC). CALIFORNIA 9220'
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH FLOOR
4080 LEMON STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
Joseph A. Richards, Planning Director
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING CO(~.MISSION to
consider the application(s} described below. The Planning Department has
tentatively found that the proposed project(s) will have no significant
environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s).
The Planning Ccmmission will consider whether or not to adopt the negative
declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing.
Place of Hearing: Board Room, 14th F1 oor, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
Date of Hearing: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 6, 1990
The time of hearing is indicated with each application listed below.
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Department before the
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption
of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearin~c
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The environmental
finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public
information counter Monday through Friday frcrn 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m.
CHANGE OF ZONE 5714 WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3046, EA 34252, is an
application submitted by ARCO Products Co for property located in the Temecula
Area and First Supervisorial District and generally described as the NW corner
of Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue to amend Ordinance No. 348, Riverside
County Land Use Ordinance. Said amendment would change zone M-SC
(Manufacturing-Service Commercial} to C-1/C-P (General Commercial), etc, or
other such zones as the Planning Commission may find appropriate for a proposal
to expand an existing gas station. (jR}
TIME OF HEARING: 2:00 P.M.
'_Zu~,:'. [; :Z
;~EEEEZ; =
;5EEEEZ: ~ :::'2:-::'-'
a'L;,r:C
Z Z ~:-' %: :=:' 5E '==-
LC'E ;'4E_EE. E;
;_i:,.
-. B. *;::l'4 5Z:
~1: ,. 5.PO-'E E_.:. . t;Z'E
5~P'DALE Ca ::2':2 ~ .
RiVERSiDE COUnC,u
Pbtnnin 3 DEP, RCI'REnC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM:
z.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBER:
PROJECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(s): <*~"
APPLICANT'S NAME: '~. ~," -
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E.A.: ~.'~
STANDARD EVALUATION
'" MODULE NUMBER(s):
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
A,
DESCRIPTION (include proposed minimum lot s~ze and uses as applicable):
,.
_ · C- . f ~ ~ ' ' ·
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES ; or SQUARE FEET
C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s): - '
D. EXISTING ZONING:
E. PROPOSED ZO, NING:
F. STREET REFERENCES:
f" IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE'~ /
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMAI'~CE'~ __
G. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETrING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROdN~ ~,~
'~// , ~ ",'° ,-- _~Z ,
-"'-,,Z/. r
II. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check the appropriate option(s) below and proceed accordingly.
295-70 (Ne~, 1
~ All or part of the project site is in "Adopted Specific Plans," "REMAP" or "Rar'.Cho Villages Comrnu~i,.>
Policy Areas". Complete Sections III, IV (B and C only), V ancl VI. : .'-' -% /
D All or Dart of the project site is in "Areas Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV
(A, B and D only), V and VI.
[] All Or part of the project site has an Open Space and Conservation designation other than those menhone._.
above. Complete Sections III, IV (A, B, and E only), V and VI,
1
111.
A.
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
Indicate the nature of the proposed land use as determined h'om the descriptions as found in Comprehensive General Plan Ftgu,e
VI.3 (Circle One). This information is necessary to {:letermine the appropriate land use suitability ratings in Section III.B.
NA - Not Applicable Crftical Essential Normal-High Risk Normal-Low RIsk
Indicate with a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any environmental hazard and/or resource issues may significantly affect or be affecte:
by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Plan. For any issue marked yes (Y~ wrste
additional data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact and any mitigation measures under Sealion V, Also, where snchcate:
circle the appropriate land use suitability or noise acceptability rating(s). (See definitions at pottom of this page)
HAZARDS
6.
7.
8.
· Alquist-Priolo Special Studies or County Fault 12. } '
Hazard Zones (Fig. VI.1)
NA PS U R (Fig. Vl.3)
Liquefaction Potential Zone (Fig. VI,1 ) 13. r
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI,4)
Groundshaking Zone (Fig VI.1) 14. t
NA S PS U R (Rg. VI.5)
Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps) 15.
Landshde Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale ,
Seismic Maps or On-site Inspection) 16.
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6)
Rockfall Hazard (On-site Inspection) 17. /
Expansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil 18.
Conservation Service Soil Surveys) 19. '
Erosion (U.S.D.A Soil Conservatson 20.
Service Soil Surveys) 21.
Wind Ersosion & Blowsand (F~g. VI.1, 22 '
Ord. 460. Sec. 14.2 & Ord. 484) 23
Dam Inundation Area (Fig. VI.7) 24,
Floodplains (Fig. VI.7) 25.
NA U R (Fig. VI.8)
Airport Noise (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11
& V1.12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.E>
NA A B C D (F~g, Vl.11 )
Railroad Noise (Fig. VI.13 - VI.16)
NA A B C D (Rg, Vl.11 }
Highway Noise (Fig. V1.17 - VI.291
NA A B C D (Fig. VI.11)
Other Noise
NA A B C D (Rg. Vt.11 ~
Project Generated Noise Affechng
Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. VI.11 )
Noise Sensitive Project (F~g, VI.11 )
Air Quality impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Air Quahty
Water Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Water Ouahty
Hazardous Materials and Wastes
Hazardous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - VI.311
Other
Other
RESOURCES
28.
29. Iv
30./' 36
31. :" 37.
28./L_ / Agric..ure <Fig. w.34- W.35>32. Y
27. 1'.' In or Near an Agricultural Preserve 33.; .'
(Riv. Co. Agriculturat Land Conversation 34.,,.,
Contract Maps)
Wildlife (Fig. VI.36 - VI.37)
Vegetation (Fig. VI.38 - VI.40)
Mineral Resources (Fig, VI.41 - VI.42)
Energy Resources (Fig. VI.43- VI.44)
35. ~
Scenic Highways (Fig. VI.45)
Historic Resources (Fig. VI.32 - VI,33)
Archaeological Resources
(Fig. VI.32 - VI.33 & VI.46- VI.48)
Paleontological Resources
(Paleontological Resources Map)
Other
Other
Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - Not Applicable U - Generally Unsuitable
B · Conditionally Acceptable
395-70 INev, 12/87}
S - Generally Suitable
R - Restricted
C - Generally Unacceptable
PS - Provisionally Suitable
A - Generally Acceptable
D - Land Use Discouraged
LAND USE DETERMINATION
Complete this part unless the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", 'REMAP" or "Rancho
Villages Community Policy Areas."
1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s):
2. LAND USE PLANNING AREA:
3. SUBAREA, IF ANY:
4. COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IF ANY:
5. COMMUNITY PLAN, IF ANY: "" "
6. COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY:
SUMMARY OF POLICIES AFFECTING PROPOSAL:
For all proiects, inidcate with a yes (Y) or no (N/whether any public facilities and/or services issues may signihcant~y af'fe::
Or be affected by the proposal, All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Plan For ant issue
marked yes Pr), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section. V
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
1. ' Csrculat~on (Rg IV.1 *IV.11. Discuss in 10, ./.
Sec. V ExIsting, Planned & Required Roads)
2. / Bike Trails (Fig. IV.12-1V.13) 11. /
3. ' Water (Agency Letters) 12. /
4. Sewer (Agency Letters) 13. ~
5. " Fire Services (Rg. IV.16 - IV.18) 14. /
6. ~ / Shedff Services (Fig IV.17 - IV.18)
7. [,/ Schools (Fig. IV.17 - IV. 18) 15./,/'
8. i" Solid Waste (Fig. IV.17-1V.18) 16."
9. l"'" Parks and Recreation (Fig. IV.19 - IV.20) 17.
EQuestrian Trails (F~g, IV.19 - IV.24,'
Riv. Co. 800 Scale Ecluestrlan Traz'= Maps
Utilities (Fsg. IV.25 - IV.26)
Libraries (Fig. IV.17 -IV.18)
Health Services (Fig. IV.17 - IV.I 8)
Airports (Fig. 11.18.2 - 11.18.4,
11.18.8 - 11.18.10 & IV.27 - IV.36)
Disaster Preparedness
City Sphere of Influence · "
Other
C,
If all or Dart of the project is located in "Adopted Sl~ecific Plans", "REMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community
Areas", review in detail the specific policies applying to the proposal, and complete the following:
1. State the relevant land use designation(s):
2. Based on this initial stucly, is the proposal consistent with the policies and designations of the appropriate doc,.j rne-:
and therefore consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan? If not, explain:
295-70 fNe~,
LAND USE DETERMINATION (continued)
If all or part of the project site is in "Areas not Designated as Open Space", and is not in a Community Plan, comDtete
Questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete Questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in a Community Plan,
Land use category(ies) necessary to support the proposed project.
(i.e, residential, commercial, etc.) -"
Also indicate land use type
Current land use category(ies) for the site based on existing conditions.
(i.e. residential, commercial, etc.) .... ".'
Also indicate lancl use type
3. tf D.1 differs from D.2, will the difference be resolved at the development stage? Explain:
4. Community Plan 0es~gnation(s): ·
Is the DroOPseCt project COnsistent with the pohcieS ancl ciesignations of the Communi~ Plan~
If not, exl31ain:
6 Is the proposal compatible with existing and proposed surrounding land uses?
If not, explain: . .
7. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
If not, reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies: :
If all or part of the project site is in an Open Space and Conservation designation, complete the
1. State the designation(s):
2. Is the proposal consistent with the designation(s)? If not, explain:
3. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consisent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
If not, reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies:
295-7C INI~ 12/871
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES
A. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED.
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
SECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION DET'ERM~NA"IO',
ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED (YES/NO.DArE
For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III,B and IV.B, identify the Section and issue number ancl do me
following, in the format as shown below:
1. List all additional relevant data sources, including agencies consulted.
2. State air findings of fact regarding environmental concerns.
3. State specific mitigation measures, if identifiable without requiring an environmental impact report (E.I.R)
4. If additional information is required before the environmental assessment can be completed, refer to
Subsection A.
5. If addihonal sheets are needed to complete this section, check the box at the end of the section and attach
the necessary sheets.
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
, .
.,r./ :'
/:-,: - .,. , _ -. '. ,.
,I ,
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continued)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
D ,See a.ached pages.
Vl. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
,]~The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration may ~e
prepareci.
(or)
The project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, there will not be a signif~ca-'~
effect in this case because the mitigation measures clescribed in Section V have been al~l:>liecS to tr~e
project and a Negative Declaration may be prepared.
(or)
[] The Droject
is required.
295.10
may have a significant .,effect on the environment and an Environmental linDact
Name: / r Date:
Prepared i~y
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION CONTAINED IN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. 5714, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM M-SC
{MANUFACTURING - SERVICE COMMERCIAL) TO C-P-S
{SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OFWINCHESTER
ROAD AND JEFFERSON AVENUE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOE5 OR DA I N AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission
and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the
Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of
Temecula. The application land use district as shown on the attached exhibit is
hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of
Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time
by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning
Map is amended by placing in affect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone
No. 5714 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the
City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and
cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City.
SECTION 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the
date of its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
__ day of ,1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
STAFFRPT\CZ5714 3
RESOLUTION NO, 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
30~6 TO PERMIT OPERATION OF AN EXISTING GAS
STATION AND MINI-MART AT JEFFERSON AVENUE AND
WINCHESTER ROAD.
WHEREAS, Arco Products, Inc., filed CUP No. 3046 in accordance with
the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said CUP application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said CUP on June 6,
1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said CUP;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to
the said CUP on October 30, 1990, at which time interested persons had opportunity
to testify either in support or opposition to said CUP; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceeding and
Staff Report regarding the CUP;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
the following findings:
Findinqs.
That the Temecula City Council hereby makes
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
FORMS/R ES-CUP. CC 1
{a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, l hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed CUP is consistent with the SWAP and meets
the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to
wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
la)
There is reasonable probability that CUP No.
3046 proposed will be consistent with the
general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted 9eneral plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.26(e), no CUP may be approved
unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be
FORMS/RES-CUP. CC 2
detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and
further, that any CUP approved shall be subject to such conditions as
shall be necessary to protect the health· safety and general welfare of
the community.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the CUP proposed
is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
project will
Declaration,
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the city of Temecula City Council hereby approves CUP No. 3046
for the operation and construction of existing gas station and mini-mart located at
the northwest corner of Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue subject to the
following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Resolution.
SECTION 4_~. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
· 1990.
RON PARKS
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
JUNE GREEK
CITY CLERK
FORMS/RES-CUP. CC 3
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for CUP No, 3046.
DATED: By
Name
Title
FORMS/RES-CUP.CC 4
ITEM NO. 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER l~Ci_-~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA A GENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager
October 19, 1990
CONTRACT SERVICES FOR YNEZ CORRIDOR PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the City Manager's recommendation for contract
services with C.M. Max Gilliss.
DISCUSSION
During the past several weeks, I have been impressed with the results of some
assignments I have given to Max Gilliss to perform on Assessment Districts 159 and
161. As you will remember, those assessment districts are currently being
administered by the County of Riverside.
The City of Temecula will be administering the Mello Roos Assessment Districts
project commonly referred to as the Ynez Corridor. It is essential that this project be
effectively and efficiently managed and, therefore, I am recommending that we hire
Max Gilliss as a project coordinator, working for the City Manager on the Ynez
Corridor Project and other related public works projects.
The cost associated with this contract will be $50 per hour based on approximately
30-hours per week.
I strongly recommend that the City Council concur with the recommendation of the
City Manager in contracting for Max Gilliss
ITEM NO.
14
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 30, 1990
Proposals for Curb-side Recycling Program
Prepared by: Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Manager be instructed to solicit proposals for
a curb-side recycling program to be instituted city-wide.
BACKGROUND: Councilmember Mu~oz has requested that the matter of
curb-side recycling be placed on the agenda for formal instruction to staff regarding
soliciting proposals to institute a city-wide program.
ITEM
NO.
15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
S UBJ E C T:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DAVID f. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
OCTOBER 30, 199O
PERSONNEL RECLASSIFICATION
PREPARED BY: Director of Community Services, Shawn Nelson
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Adopt a revised resolution entitled Establishment of Personnel Policies No. 90 -
to reclassify Recreation Supervisor position to Recreation Superintendent and establish
authorized positions, titles, and salary ranges for all city employees.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This reclassification will have no fiscal impact this fiscal year due to the proposed
hiring date of TCSD staff. However, if the position were filled for a full year, the
maximum fiscal impact including salary and benefits would be $11,928.
DISCUSSION:
The Temecula Community Services District is divided into three divisions: Parks,
Recreation, and Park Planning and Development. The planning, organization, and
execution of a comprehensive recreation program to provide a wide variety of re-
creation services is vital to the successful operations of the TCSD.
As a division head, the Recreation Superintendent will be responsible for developing
a city-wide recreation program as well as preparing and administering an operating
budget and supervising Recreation Supervisors, Recreation Leaders, and other support
staff.
Enclosed is an analysis of the recommended change and salary survey data provided
by the City's personnel consultant, Michael Deblieux.
City of Temecula
Community Services
October 22, 1990
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a revised Personnel
Resolution (Attachment I) reflecting recommended changes to the
Community Services organizational structure.
Issue
The Director of Community Services has proposed changes to the
duties of an authorized Recreation Supervisor position which have
an impact on the classification level of the position.
Background
Each year the City develops an operating budget based on a variety
of program, financial and other assumptions. As the budget is
implemented, refinements to the original budget assumptions are
necessary to assure the delivery of cost effective municipal
services. The budgeted Community Services organization was based
upon general assumptions in the absence of a full-time Director.
Report
One Recreation Supervisor position was approved as a part of the FY
1990/91 budget. This position was designed to function as a field
supervisor for a variety of recreation and leisure service
programs. As the City's recreation program develops, it is likely
that additional positions will be requested at this level to plan
and oversee specific programs.
The Director of Community Services has proposed significant changes
to the tentative duties planned for this position during the budget
process. The new duties include working as a division head within
the Community Services department. Assignments will involve
planning, organizing and developing a wide variety of City-wide
recreation and leisure services programs. As a division head, the
position will be responsible for developing, recommending and
administering the operating budget for the division. As new
programs are developed and implemented, the position will supervise
Recreation Supervisors, Recreation Leaders and other staff. This
position will develop and implement policies and procedures for the
division and serve as a member of the departmental management team.
Qualifications for this position include a Bachelor's degree or
equivalent experience in recreation, leisure services or a closely
related field; approximately three years of related experience;
knowledge of a variety of recreation activities and programs, and
ability to plan, organize and supervise a wide variety of
recreational and leisure activities including selecting and
training staff, developing and administering budgets, developing
and implementing policies and procedures, interacting with the
public and planning and directing publicity for recreational and
leisure services programs.
Based on the recommended responsibilities, we are recommending that
the position be reclassified to a new class of Recreation
Superintendent and that the salary range for the position be set at
$3,331 - $4,148 per month. The recommended salary range is based
on internal relationships. We have used the classification of
Recreation Supervisor as the Benchmark position for this
comparison. The entry point for recommended range is approximately
5.5% above the maximum rate for Recreation Supervisor.
If the City Council adopts this recommendation, the current
Recreation Supervisor position will be replaced by a new Recreation
Superintendent position. We are recommending that the list of
Authorized Positions, Titles and Salary Ranges (Attachment I -
Exhibit A) continue to include the title of Recreation Supervisor
with zero (0) authorized positions to facilitate anticipated growth
during the next budget year.
Fiscal Impact
The recommended action does not add any new positions to the
current total of 48. Although authorized, the Recreation
Supervisor position has not been filled. The recommendation will
not have an overall fiscal impact this fiscal year. However, if
the position were filled for a full year, the maximum fiscal impact
on salaries would be $11,928.
Conclusions
The recommended change to the Community Services table of
organization may be accommodated by a basic adjustments to the
existing personnel classification and budget structure. Once this
position is filled and becomes operational a formal classification
study should be conducted to verify its actual duties and to
develop a formal position description.
Michael R. Deblieux
Ideas for Effective Management
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL POLICIES
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.08.060 of the City's Municipal
Code, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to
adopt those policies as identified below;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula as follows:
SECTION 1. The attached list of Position Titles and Salaries (Exhibit A) is hereby
adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to
this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The list of Position Titles and Salaries shall become effective immediately
and may be thereafter amended.
SECTION 3. The City Manager shall implement the above list of Positions Titles and
Salaries and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's
personnel policies.
SECTION 4. All prior resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with this
Resolution are hereby rescinded.
PASSED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting held on the 30th day of October, 1990.
ATFF.,ST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Resos 110
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 30th day of October,
1990, by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
3/Resos 110
Attachment I - Exhibit A
# of
Positions
Exempt/
Non-exempt
CITY OF TEMECULA
Authorized Positions. Titles and Salary Ranges
Minimum
Maximum
2 NE
1 NE
1 E
5 NE
1 NE
1 E
2 NE
5 NE
1 E
1 E
1 NE
1 E
1 E
1 E
1 E
1 E
1 E
1 E
1 E
2 NE
7 NE
1 NE
2 NE
1 E
0 E
1 NE
1 E
1 NE
1 NE
2 E
48
Account Clerk
Accountant
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Secretary
Assistant Planner
Assistant to the City Manager
Associate Planner
Building Inspector
Chief Accountant
City Manager
Code Enforcement Officer
Deputy City Clerk
Director of Building and Safety
Director of Community Services
Director of Finance
Director of Planning
Executive Secretary
Information Systems Manager
Maintenance Supervisor
Maintenance Worker
Office Assistant
Planning Technician
Recreation Leader
Recreation Superintendent
Recreation Supervisor
Secretary
Senior Accountant
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Maintenance Worker
Senior Planner
$1,600
$2,498
$2 105
$1 702
$2.464
$2.807
$2.885
$2 431
$3,377
$2,193
$2,414
$5,236
$5.236
$5. 236
$5 236
$2 285
$4 148
$3 331
$1 667
$1 303
$2 193
$1 424
$3 331
$2,533
$1,454
$2,788
$2,675
$1,926
$3,424
$1 993
$3 111
$2 621
$2 120
$3 068
$3 495
$3 592
$3 027
$4.205
$2 731
$3.006
$6.519
$6.519
$6.519
$6.519
$2 846
$5. 165
$4.148
$2 076
$1. 624
$2.73 1
$1 774
$4 148
$3 154
$1 811
$3 471
$3 331
$2 398
$4 236
October 30, 1990
City of Temecula - Salary Survey - 22-Oct-90
AclencY
City of Corona
City of Escondido
City of Hemet
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Moreno Valley
City of Perris
City of Riverside
City of San Marcos
Rancho Calif. Water Dist.
Mean Survey Agencies
~Median Survey Agencies
Recreation
Suoerintendent
3,526 4,285
3,560 5,250
3,528 4,502
3,752 4,788
3,748 4,556
3,623 4,676
3,560 4,556
I City of Temecula
Recommended is +/- Median
3,331 4,148
-6.87% -9.84%
temsur9b.wkl
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
RECREATION DIVISION
RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
Functions:
Under direction of the Community Services Director, is responsible for the plan-
ning, promotion, development, training, and coordination of a city-wide recrea-
tion and leisure services program i.e. outdoor recreation, special population
groups, athletics and sports, human services, senior citizen activities, aqua-
tics, arts and crafts, cultural arts, dram, dance, etc.
Supervision:
Responsible to the Community Services Director. The employee is responsible for
all recreation division personnel as well as coordination of community volun-
teers,
Example of Duties:
* Plans, initiates, organizes, and supervises a comprehensive recreation
program in accordance with the interests and needs of the public.
* Trains and supervises recreation personnel in the area of assigned re-
sponsibility.
* Recruits, replaces, and trains community volunteers, officials, and re-
creation personnel.
* Serves as a recreation consultant to staff and to local organizations
within the community.
* Participates in departmental planning, research, training, and budget
preparation.
* Maintains records and prepares written monthly and annual reports re-
lating to the evaluation of specific recreation programs.
* Assists in the promotion, organization, and direction of city-wide spe-
cial events and activities.
Qualifications:
* Thorough knowledge of the principles, techniques, methods, supplies, and
equipment applicable to recreation services.
* Thorough knowledge of the philosophy and objectives of the park/recrea-
tion field.
Thorough knowledge of the organization, planning, scheduling, and tech-
niques of community group relations involved in direction operations and
programs at functionally developed recreation facilities.
Thorough knowledge of the services rendered by other public and volun-
tary agencies in the community, with stress on recreation and related
services.
* Ability to effectively delegate duties and responsibilities to recrea-
tion staff to enhance personnel development.
* Superior ability to motivate, work with and supervise personnel; ability
to meet and work cooperatively with the public.
* Personal skills in various recreation activities and services including
public speaking and the ability to prepare news releases for the media.
Education and Experience:
Graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor's degree in
recreation/parks or related field, and a minimum of three years of progressive
responsibility in providing community recreation services.
ITEM NO.
17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECUI..A
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 30, 1990
Improvement Funding Reimbursement Agreement - AD161
PREPARED BY: Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Approve recommendations as contained in the staff report
BACKGROUND: The staff report containing the
Reimbursement Agreement - AD-161, prepared by C. M.
forwarded to you under separate cover.
Improvement
"Max" Gilliss
Funding
will be
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
CSD BUSINESS
A GENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
A REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 30, 1990 PM
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of October 9, 1990 as mailed.
2. Implementation of Phase One CIP Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Authorize Reedcorp Engineering, Inc. to develop plans and
specifications for the Sports Park and Temecula Valley High
School Lighting Projects·
MANAGERS REPORT
DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting:
November 12, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol street, Temecula, California
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD OCTOBER 9, 1990, 1990
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order
at 8:13 PM, President Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were Acting City Manager Rick Sayre, City Attorney Scott F. Field and
Susan W. Jones, Recording Secretary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CSD BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Parks to approve the
minutes of September 18, 1990, and September 25, 1990 as mailed.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
2. Renewal of Landscaping Contract
Jeanine Overson, Director of CSA-143, reported that per the request of the
Council, a study was done evaluating the quality of work provided by East
Brother's Landscaping. The recommendation of CSA-143 is to not approve
East Brother's Landscape Contract, She explained many efforts had been made
to work with East Brothers and their service remains substandard.
4\CSDMIN\I 00990 -1 - 10/26/90
CSD Minutes October 9, 1990
Fred Laspesa, 29751 Dawncrest Circle, stated he had been working with East
Brother's on problem areas located in the Woodcrest Country Homes. He
reported that improvement has been made and a new manager has been hired.
He suggested giving this company one more chance to improve its service.
Director Lindemans asked how long this problem with East Brothers has
existed. Ms. Overson answered that there has always been a problem with this
company, and the problem exists with Woodcrest Country Homes as well as
other areas in the City for which they provide service.
Director Moore stated she felt this company has had proper notice and chance
to improve and has not successfully done so.
Director Moore moved, Director Parks seconded a motion not to approve East
Brother's Landscape Contract and to approve McKenzie Landscaping to provide
the needed service as outlined in the staff report.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
3, Cancellation of the Regular CSD Meeting of October 23, 1990
President Birdsall explained this is due to four members of the board attending
the League of California Cities Conference, which will conflict with the October
23, 1990 CSD Meeting.
Director Parks asked if there is a need to schedule another CSD meeting on
October 30, 1990.
Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, stated the first Parks and
Recreation Commission Meeting will be held October 22, 1990 at Rancho
Elementary School, 7:00 PM. He said the Commission will be discussing
several issues, including the lighting of Sports Park.
City Manager Dixon suggested setting a meeting on October 30, 1990.
4\CSDMIN\100990 -2- 10/26/90
CSD Minutes October 9. 1990
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to cancel the
regular CSD Meeting of October 23, 1990.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
CITY MANAGERS REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Parks stated he would like staff to note the six items presented by Mr. Glen
Richardson during Council Public Comments, that have not been addressed, and bring
them back before the board in the near future.
Director Mu~oz presented staff information received from the Automobile Club of
Southern California relative to bike paths.
4\CSDMIN\100990 -3- 10/26/90
CSD Minutes October 9. 1990
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 8:40
PM, to a meeting on October 30, 1990. The motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
4\CSDMIN\100990 -4o 10/26/90
ITEM
NO.
2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECUI. A
AGENDA REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SHAWN D. NELSON / DAVID F. DIXON
OCTOBER 30, 199O
IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE I - CIP PROJECTS
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Authorize Reedcorp Engineering, Inc. to develop plans and specifications for the
Sports Park and Temecula Valley High School Lighting System Project.
FISCAL IMPACT.' Engineering services not to exceed $11,000.00. These specifi-
cation services were budgeted in the capital outlay section of the TCSD budget.
DISCUSSION: On October 22, 1990, the Parks and Recreation Commission unani-
mously approved and recommended for Board approval, the Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for the TCSD. Phase I of the CIP is to install lights to two (2) fields
on the lower Rancho Vista fields in Sports Park and light two (2) baseball
fields at Temecula Valley High School.
Authorization to begin development of plans and specifications is necessary to
meet the objective of having operational lights by March 1, 1991 for youth and
adult recreation programs. An environmental assessment on this project will be
completed by City Planning, and official notice of the proposed project and pub-
lic hearing date will be distributed to the surrounding property owners by No-
vember 9, 1990. Tentative public hearing date and proposed authorization of re-
leasing formal bids is December 4, 1990.
Enclosed are site plans for the proposed lights in Sports Park and Temecula
Valley High School; an overview of the submitted proposals; a sample agreement
for consultant services, and the approved CIP for the TCSD. Each phase of the
CIP will be presented to the Board for approval and execution.
:0
/
i
t" .
I. .
I
iI
I
I
I
/
/
/
/,L~
SPORTS PARK AND TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL
PROPOSAL S FOR SPECIFICATIONS
e
Reedcorp Engineering, Inc.
A. Base bid 9 9,300 plus misc.
i.e. soil tests, lab tests, etc.
Contract not to exceed 911,000.
Dream Engineering, Inc.
A. Base bid 910,920 plus misc.
i.e. soil tests, lab tests, etc.
Contract not to exceed 912,620.
RWR Pascoe Engineering, Inc.
A. Base bid 918,000 plus misc.
i.e. soil tests, lab tests, etc.
Contract not to exceed 919,700.
911,000.00
91 2,620.00
919,700.00
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FY 1990-91
Proposed Projects
Phase I - Sports Park & T.V.H.S.
Lighting System Project**
Phase 2 - Restroom facility, drinking
fountains (3), and sod infield * *
Phase 3 - Landscape architect - Sports Park*
Phase 4 - Parks & Recreation Master Plan*
Phase 5 - Initial bike path route**
TOTAL
* Monies already budgeted in operating costs.
* * Monies already budgeted in capital outlay.
Budget
$335,000
75,000
5,000
60,000
30.000
$505,000
·
mmm'
·
0 -*
q~'
O(
00_.
i0 q
C~
"" ·
Or~o