HomeMy WebLinkAbout100990 CC AgendaCALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER
OCTOBER 9, 1990- 7:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 90-17
Resolution: No. 90-102
Pastor Gary Nelson
Calvary Chapel
Councilmember Birdsall
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks
Closed session pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 to consider real property acquisition, and Government Code Section 54956.9
to discuss matters relating to litigation.
PRESENTATIONS/
PRO CLA MA TIONS
Introduction of Anthony Elmo - Chief Building Official
Certificates of Appreciation for Mary Jo Helmeke
and Eve Craig (Temecula Arts Festival '90)
Proclamation - "Joan F. Sparkman Day"
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two
(2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed
on the Agenda, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed
with the City Clerk.
21egende/100g90 I 10/04/90
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the
City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time
limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all
will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and
resolutions included in the agenda.
2
3
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 25, 1990, as mailed.
Resolution ADDroving Payment of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
2legendall OOggO 2 10/04/80
4
Public Employee's Retirement System Enrollment
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA .
4.2
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Certification of
Governing Body's Action.
4.3
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPL 0 YEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
5
Acceptance of Public Iml~rovements in Tract 20319
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20319.
5.2 Authorize the reduction of street, sewer, and water bonds and
release Monument Bond.
5.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
2/agenda/100g80 3 10/04/~O
6
Plot Plan No. 11669, Tentative Parcel Mao No. 25633
Southwesterly side of Business Park Drive, north of Rancho California Road
7
8
9
10
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Uphold Planning Commission's Approval of Plot Plan No. 11669
and Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633.
Tentative Tract Mao No. 19872, Amended No. 2. Phase 3 and 4, a Revised
Permit
Southerly of Pala Road, westerly of Via Gilberto
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Receive and file.
Conditional Use Permit No. 2
Abutting the west side of Ynez Road and the east side of I-15, approximately
200 feet north of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way.
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Receive and file.
Plot Plan 11620
The Northerly side of Enterprise Circle North abutting the southerly side of
Santa Gertrudis Creek.
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Receive and file.
Substantial Conformance No. 9
Southern corner of Bueking Drive and Madison Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Receive and file.
2/~end~/100g~O 4 10/04/~O
CSD MEETING - (To be held at 8:00 PM) Please see separate agenda
11 . Approval of Allocation of Funds for City of Temecula Emplovees Holiday Dinner
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Allocate the sum of $2,350 to cover the costs of the first annual
City Employees Holiday Party.
12 Cancellation of the Reqular Meeting of October 23. 1990
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve cancellation of the City Council Meeting scheduled for
October 23, 1990.
13 Final Parcel Map No. 21383
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 21383, the Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions, and the Special Facilities Agreement, subject to
the conditions of approval, and the conditions as put forth in
Development Agreement No. 1.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14
Aol;)eal of Planninq Commission Denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 1
West side of Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and Overland Drive.
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Uphold Planning Commission's Denial of Conditional Use Permit
No. 1.
2/,gendi/1 ooeeo 6 10/04/80
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15
Sam Hicks Park Dedication of Land
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Accept the offer of dedication of Sam Hicks Park subject to the
reverter contained in the Grant Deed and the Declaration of
Restrictions, and subject to the Old Town Temecula Foundation
approving the revised land lease for the Museum.
16
Adult Business Permit Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Introduce, ready by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RELATING TO ADULT BUSINESSES AND
REQUIRING A PERMIT THEREFOR
17
18
Committee to Select General Plan Consultants
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Appoint Steven Ford and John Hoagland, members of the Planning
Commission and two members of the City Council to interview
consultants for development of the City's general plan.
Consideration of Scheduling City Council/City Manager Team Building Session
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Approve staff recommendations which includes the hiring of a
facilitator and setting aside the weekend of November 9th, 10th
and 11 th, 1990 for a team building workshop for the City Council.
2/agehole/1 ooeeo 8 1 o/o4/eo
19
Urgency Ordinance Establishing Decision Making Authority for Subdivision and
Land Use Applications
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY FOR
SUBDIVISION AND LAND USE APPLICATIONS.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: October 16, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
211gentle/100g80 7 10/04/80
Proclamation
The City of Temecula
RECOGNIZING THE EXTRAORDINARY COMMUNITY SERVICE OF
JOAN F. SPARKMAN
WHEREAS, Joan Sparkman has long been a leader in the Temecula Valley serving as
a member of the Temecula Valley School Board; and
WHEREAS, she has served the business and professional community with distinction
as senior vice president of Temecula Valley National Bank; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County YWCA has recently honored Joan Sparkman by
awarding her their prestigious Athena Award as a Woman of Achievement '90, in recognition
of extraordinary women who have achieved excellence in the civic, economic and cultural life
of Riverside County; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula wishes to commend Joan
Sparkman for her many years of selfless devotion to the betterment of her community;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald J. Parks, Mayor of the City of Temecula, hereby
proclaim October 9th, as
JOAN F. SPARKMAN DAY IN TEMECULA
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 9th day of October, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks
Mayor
June S. Greek
Deputy City Clerk
ITEM
NO.
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD SEPTEMBER 25, 1990
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at
7:02 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol, Temecula, California.
Mayor Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were Acting City Manager Rick Sayre, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and
Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor George Simmons, Temecula Valley House of
Praise.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Mu~oz.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff requested the removal of Item No. 6 from the agenda.
Councilmember Birdsall asked that staff recheck the fees listed in the staff report on
page one before this matter comes back to the City Council. She pointed out that the
K-Rat fees appear to be excessive and suggested they may be in error on the report.
Councilmember Moore requested the removal of Item No. 8 and 10 from the Consent
Calendar.
Councilmember Mu~oz requested the removal of Item No. 9 from the Consent
Calendar.
Hinutes\9\25\90 -1- 10/01/90
City Council Minutes September 25, 1990
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
approve Consent Calendar Items No. 1-5, 7 and 11 as follows:
1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and
resolutions included in the agenda.
2. Resolution Approving Payment of Demands
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
Flexible Benefits Plan
3.1
Adopt the attached City of Temecula Flexible Benefits Plan
Document.
3.2 Establish a monthly Flexible benefit amount for full time
employees and the City Council of $450 exclusive of retirement.
· 4pxTlication for ABC License - Yasohachi Shiojima
4.1 Receive and file.
Claim for Damages - Colleen Farrell vs. City of Temecula
5.1 Deny the claim for damages.
Reduction of Securities for Tract No. 20987
7.1 Authorize the reduction in securities for improvements in Tract No.
20987 and direct the City Clerk to advise the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors to so notify the Bond Company (SAFECO Insurance
Company of America)
Hinutes\9\25\90 -2- 10/01/90
City Council Minutes September 25, 1990
11. lO-A Permit - Stephen's Kangaroo Rat
11.1
Authorize the Mayor to execute Federal Fish and Wildlife
License/Permit Application for incidental "take".
11.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute First Amendment to Agency
Agreement California Endangered Species Permit.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Mu~oz, Parks
Moore,
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
8. Parcel Map No. 23969
Councilmember Moore referred to Planning Condition No. 23, asking that the
"Standard 810 barricade" be changed to something more aesthetic.
Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, stated this is a temporary barricade and
will be removed when adjoining properties are developed.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked for a brief report from staff outlining the major
issues in this case.
Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, explained the significant issue discussed before
the Planning Commission was the design of the road where the barricade is
proposed. He stated the sewer agency installed lines in the road right-of-way,
which caused a re-design of the road.
Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, presented slides showing the right-of-way
and the 10 foot strip the applicant has agreed to construct.
Hinutes\9\25\90 -3- 10/01/90
City Council Minutes September 25, 1990
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to
receive and file Parcel Map No. 23969.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Mu~oz, Parks
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Moore,
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised Permit No. I
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if this two-lane street can handle the potential
traffic proposed by this project?
Doug Stewart stated that it is his understanding that a traffic study was done
which addressed these issues.
Gary Thornhill said this project is a very low generator of traffic. It is a storage
facility, and would receive mostly night and weekend access, and therefore is
not a concern to staff.
Mayor Parks asked if there are any plans for a traffic signal at this intersection.
He stated he shares Councilmember Mu~oz' concern regarding the traffic in this
area and asked the Engineering Department to look into a possible exit off of
Lyndie Lane from the Car Wash and shopping center.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Moore
to receive and file Conditional Use Permit No. 2980, Revised Permit No. 1.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes\9\25\90 -4- 10101/90
City Council Minutes September 25, 1990
10.
Plot Plan No. 11345
Councilmember Moore stated there was no indication in the staff report that
this project has gone before the Old Town Architectural Review Committee and
asked that staff make sure these projects go to the committee for review and
recommendations. She also said there are no comments from the School
District regarding this project.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he spoke with the applicant who assured him
this project obtained approval from the Architectural Review Committee. He
said, however, with the committee being so newly formed, perhaps these
standards should be reviewed. He suggested putting this plot plan on hold until
this could be accomplished.
Mayor Parks said this plot plan does not allow the developer to build without
first obtaining a building permit and stated this was approved by the Planning
Director in March of 1990.
Gary Thornhill reported that the adoption of standards for the Architectural
Review Committee is several months away and suggested the Council not delay
this project any further.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall
to approve Plot Plan No. 11345 based on the findings and subject to the
Conditions of Approval contained in the attached Riverside County Staff Report
dated April 23, 1990; and the added condition of the City of Temecula
Engineering Department; and adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-10 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 11345 TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF
1,800 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SHOPS, SOUTH SIDE
OF MAIN STREET, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET WEST OF FRONT
STREET ("THE EMPORIUM")
Councilmember Mu~oz requested this approval be amended to state, "that on
the representation of the applicant, this has been approved by the Architectural
Review Committee."
Hinutes\9\25\90 -5- 10/01/90
' City Council Minutes September 25, 1990
Councilmember Moore amended the motion and Councilmember Birdsall
seconded.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
12.
Waste General Study Memorandum of Understanding with City/County of
Riverside
June Greek, Deputy City Clerk, reported she spoke with Mr. Rufus Young of
Burke, Williams and Sorenson who reviewed the paperwork sent to the City by
the County. He stated the Memorandum of Understanding is acceptable.
City Attorney Field stated that State Law (AB 939) mandates that by 1995 a
25% reduction in solid waste generation and a 50% reduction by the year
2,000. He said that in the near future the Council will be looking at recycling
plans. He reported that part of State legislation is a requirement for the Waste
Characterization Study that the County is initiating in cooperation with the
Cities of Riverside Counties.
Mayor Parks stated that the benefit to the City, is that the cost will be a very
small portion, based upon our population, within the entire County, versus
doing our own study which would be much more costly.
Councilmember Lindemans reported that he and Councilmember Moore recently
spent time in the City of Irvine studying their Waste Management Program.
He said that by separating the garbage for recycling, Irvine has attained an
18% waste reduction. He said Temecula will soon be presented with a
proposal to separate refuse and an educational program on how this can be
accomplished.
Hinutes\9\25\90 -6- 10/01/90
City Council Minutes September 25, 1990
Councilmember Birdsall stated that Fallbrook is currently in the process of
implementing a trial trash sorting program. She stated this is mandated state-
wide by AB939.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion
to authorize the Mayor to execute the Memorandum of Understanding with the
County of Riverside for Waste Management Generation Study.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
Acting City Manager Rick Sayre stated that in the near future he will be introducing
an addition six members of staff who are currently in training.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Birdsall requested the following:
1. That the schedule for the traffic directors on Ynez and Winchester be modified
to begin and end at an earlier hour on Saturdays.
2. That extra traffic directors be added on the "Tractor Race Weekend", October
5, 6 and 7.
Mayor Parks requested that a "fast track" program be developed to expedite the
required steps in the planning process for companies like ACS and that a staff member
be assigned to the "fast track" projects.
Minutes\9\25\90 -7- 10/01/90
City Council Minutes September 25, 1990
Councilmember Lindemans asked that this be voted upon by the Council.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked that staff take precautions to assure the quality of the
job not be sacrificed due to "fast tracking".
Mayor Parks also asked the status of Assessment Districts 159 and 161, and asked
that this be given priority.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
adjourn at 7:55 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
Ninutes\9\25\90 -8- 10/01/90
ITEM
NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of
$49,563.62.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 9th day of October, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
3/Resosl07 10/02/90
u
0
tg
Z'-.
S, C, ,S= C, C, C. ,.::, ,D ,S, ,C, ,_'3, C, r, C, ,3, C, C, C-, C, C, C, ,.:, C, C:, C, ,:, ,2,
,z: C, ,c, C, ,z. C, C, C, ,g, C. ,g, C, .5 C, C..Z, C, C, C:, C. ,:::, ,s, C, ,2, ,S C, C
.:~ S c: S ¥ S .:; ..::: c: .:: .:~ .~. j .:j S S S c: :~ S .;: S .:j S S .:: S
LLI El::
¢ Z Ld f':~ ILl
gL ~ Ld C3
03 E b_
F- W
Z LL >- g'J LLI E3 r'--
~ LLI ¢ I-- EE Z
\ E ~ 1'3 ~ H LdLLI -'~
LI] Ld Ld 4: Z ~ 03 C] C] h
I O"'J F- Q_ F- ~ ZZ
P, EC ¢ ~' LL bJ LLI LLI Z ([ J
'-.. ~ O ¢ ¢ Gr'J O ILl ld
C~ E _1 E EE Q:: h LL (]: >-
~ bl I F- LL EL Z Z I U'J ¢ U]
~ W ~: x O O0
O bj
O O ~ Z Z ~ F · ~
~ O ¢ O Z 0 O 0 ~ O ~ O 3~ 0 ~ O W O ¢ 0
UJ +, 2' :1
iiJ F- F- LJ
~- v >- v I-- ~ 03 v LLI v ) ~ d ,.. ¢(]: v Z v ~ '-' We '," <!
,'r' Ill I-- Ill Z · fi, ~J E ~J '~ 0J Z I~ O O 12,J LL ~ --, I]J J 8J ¢ J I~ J Z · .0 -4
~0 C LLI r- O ~ Ld r' LLI r' LLI r' ¢ r De3 Z: bJ .C: t J:: 23 r ~ J2. WZ .E: L3 --
:::3 E: bj LI. i
LL C' C, t. LI 'D ,.D C, . C. W C, ~ ,D O C, ,"', .,:, C, ,~_,, Q ,C, _., ,
O- O' FO' O' O- CLO'
co ~ h > m m m o ,,a LL r,- o r- ~ ~ .~. b- c. c, ,:r r-- r- ,
Z C, C, [,3 C, Z ,-', .3,
O ¢ :Z ~ rr' W Z J
F.~ EL ,~
F - ~
~ ~ ~ _1 ~ CL Lg E r.~ 03
O'J :>'- W J / J 3 ,::3: O ,0 13 rSJC; C!ii:
Z bJ W
Ld J Q: ~ D EE O ~ ¢ ['-.I F. '.:, 7 ,r_:, .
,", I / C) CL
'r 03 ¢
O ~ :> ¢ W O O ¢ >- Z ¢ Z Z
r.3 ,-". [3 ,", ,"', J .',
O' O' i::lO' :30' .0'
LLI\ >-'x '7'--. r.J\ ¢\ ':~\ LLI\ 3'x-x. E\ (j\ Q::\ H-,-., LL_"-. tl'- -
F- ~- F r-- ¢ m w ca · m
el: ,"' ~- ,-~ J ~ 'r .,-, O ,~ LL C'I <I C"4 ~ ,.~ ,-~ 'T C".t J '-' Q t":' F- ,-', ,-, _J ':_, r i ',
t-\ W\ Z'- LLI\ .\ 8\ ~-\ b/x', J\ J\ Z\ ¢\\ ([\ ¢'- "-
CgO' EQ' >~0- t-0' ~0'
C, C, C, C, C, · C. C, C, C, ,C, C, C, 'D C, C' ,C, 7.
~ ¢ ¢ .iLl ¢ Z J 03 Z
O ). J rr' ~ >- O I [0 EE
r.~ O ~ 3 O
Ld > Z O W
~- F ,~ ,,, o ,-- ~.- ~ 7 ~c U ,,, - n 7 ..... :. ::;
,::I C. F- ..?., J E C,
h O- LLI 0'- Z C, W (> CJ C, O O'
.f..FJ "l" I'i r'-- ~ i} [-- iTI Cr~ 0" ~ ,.0 U'J I} J 0" 0~ (]2 -.'I ~E [~l ([ C' L~I ':' ,:, L] IJ'3 [ ) 1]' i)'
C' C' C, ,'-, C, C'
EF ,.":, 0' '3' 0' 0" 0" C'
'~' 03 0] I:D ~ ,0 P'- E0 0" 0' O' 0' 0" 0'-
H ~ ~ ~
0" 0' 0' 0'. 0'- 0' O' 0" C, C, C. C, C, C,
C, O O C. C, O C. C, ,-~
r..Zt ~ Io -,0
-0 O" O' l> O'. O' 0"
I b'3 U3 U3 U3 bl b3 iJ'3 b3 b3 b3 U3 b3 b3 b3
.:. .-. .-. o o o .:.
: ,~', ,:D O O C, C. C, ,5 "'
~S F., o o o o .D o c, X
c. c. c. c,
r~! +j 0
0
-~ FIt y'l
i_! iil
E
fLi
r~
E
Z\
L
O Q~
~ u
r"
L
rr;
C, >-
O'
-.~ ~ v
.~ · o
,.:, U
C, C' C, C-4 C..I -8 -O ,-, ,m ,^, ~ C, ~ IZt r"j3 b3 C., ,D U3 F":, F) 0- C,- -8 43 L, 3 C:
,c, c. c, :~: ;~: r--- r-, r:, r:, r'.~ ,c, m r'.j c, c.~ u3 b3 b- c, u'~ r~ r-- b, ~. q- ?- --, c; ,.:i r- F:
·
<; ,--:,4 ~: j ~: j c'.;c.; 4 o.: 4 4 d .,-,r-: ; ~ r:: r;,'--.r';~..~r-: r--'r-.;r; 4 ,:,'; 4 ,
q3 -0 ~
LLI e3:: ZCO
.J W OF- W 03
0_ ~g ~ ~ Z Ld
~ 03,J ~ bJ Ld
W LB O3 E (j ~: .J
LLI J El -r W 133 h.I I W W
O 121 Z Z~ Ct
L1 Z ~ !Z O t-- · Lr; W Z Ld "
,,, z z z j ~
Z LL Ld j H ~ Q_U _.7
..
Z
[13 O tj
· ~ Z I-- 'r' p- -c:Z: ZZ
F' -P LLI -H ,u C3 ~J W n ~j EL EL +J W P ,u L.d -~J J .~--~ -~-'
O Lg O E 0 CO O O 0 ~ O ~ O E 0 COC,r:103 0 'r 0 "' O -J 0
I"- Z P >' F- h F- I'- Z ~:: F- F"' I'-
¢ I J ~ T
~ ~ .~ EL ~ ILl .~ (]:: .~ ~1-- ~ t30
U U iZ U tl ~' U L8 r j3 U ~ W U J U
r' 12~ .C :> E E · ~ ~: d: ~ r' :3 ~ r' W r' ¢ ¢ (]:: ,E W E LLI r- ¢ C H U,J _C 03
O P-- LJ O U ~r UF¢ [_] I--LL C3 ¢:>
C, ,2, td ':, 0 C, C, C, C, ' ' ' 03,3, C., C, C:,
i"- q' :1: r-':, q- ..4 ['*.1 ["4 (]0 P- rx r'- 3 b3 b3 C' ~ ~
'~ C' F' C' C' ~ ,-4 ~ ~ f',l ["4 ["1 ~ C' 'C' '~ ~ -~
O' 1:~ ¢C0 WO'O' I---r-- 0', 0--o-o- El:O- O- 0',0.2`
C, C, ILl 0 n 0 C, 0 C, C, C, ,:, ,S, EL C, C, C, C, ~,
LLI i~ 03 L) [_9 Z t,J
rj'J CD ~-~ I[t )' ~0 ~ O Ld LL t'9 i,~ .-, I"'-, ~"j h ':2
~ ,-., m o ~ c, K, co r-- × ,'r b_ r..~ ,", c..~ :~:
o z o uJ o .:, o :~: ::< x o - .:. ,-, cc
~. ~ 0" } 0' LL ..-4 0' ~ ~ W 03 0" m 0' ~) ~.T 03 !'r
Z C, t-- ,:, ~ O C' C, ,3, C, IZ C, J C, C, C, Z C, J C, C, C, ,2., Z C,
¢0' I~0' O' >-0'0' ZQ'O' O- ¢0'0'0' ¢0- ~0' _JO- -Cr-~
E\ O"- h\ l--x'--. ~-~\x, CI\ iZ\\'x t'\ A'\ (Ix. >---..-~
0\ 0'-- I:~ 0\\ ~\\ ¢\ W\\\ E"- W\ J"- td\'--
O0'- 60' {.3G" O~,0'. ,"',G',0'- ~0, LLO-O-Ch WO' r.90- C90'- IO'-g'
,.3 r-, C, C, ,:, C. C, C, ,..., ,_, ._, C, C, ,C, C; ,3
I:::t 3 Ld O ~ 03
7 F- ::E EL .J Z J
S"' 0 I-- t-- ~'~l'b3 Z IZ ~["1 S"C, ~b3 IZI >-
Ld LL 'D Z Z _J C'I C, O W I t W t Ld H mr'-. !Z '
/ C, '~ C, 3 3 O- C'.I ) I I x C, 11~ C, ,_, C, Ld C.4 Z b3 0 0'- "~ C., C,
O0"' 13 I (:3"" EI,463 emil0 ~0' We'O"~' ~m Ld-- _J~3 Ld0'0'
C_lr',- C]C0 , L10- f_lr,)P:, i:1['..1['.4 IEII]:I LLIxlxF, LLq C~lx f_91'-- "T'~,'.-., ~;.]
I:~ ~1- I:0 O- I I 6n ~1' 'C, '
o ~- o -0 o - .: .... :. 0- 0- o g o C,- g ~- o c. o o c, .:. a: ;:;-
0'0 0"0" 0'0" 0"','~'~ 0"1!1~ 0'0 0"'OC, O 0"~ 0'~ 0"~-' G"C'O
0". ~ O- 8' 0', 0'- 0'. 0- 0- 0' ~
O O O O C, C, C, ,", C, C, ,3,
C, ,3 C, C, ,D C, C, C, ,3, C, C, C:
~ C'I t.') q' I11 -0 ix I::D O' O ~ r
b3 b3 b3 : b3 b3 h3 b3 b3 b3 b3 b3
o o o o o c. :~:
o o o; o o o :~: :~: :~:
:~: g g . :~: ,:, o :g :::,, .:. ,:, ,:, :~:
C, CI
I'-- LO
!!
Z
:~: :? :?
~ ,,::S ,:'.
c.
O
u
tq
C, C, ,C,
I'- U']
r-~ b';
L~
L
Q
Q. Ld
· ~ r j0
LLI
0
U F-
r LU
L1
C,
O'
",
-,
C.
_J
-r
'FC.,
O-
-p
.J--.
C,
_1
_J
-r
_q-
O-C,
\
o-
c,
C,
IF]
b3
C,
C,
Z\
L
O OJ
O U
r-.~
W O
} >
r-
0
F.- I--
U
r' r'
r_j U
LLI
L:l
_J EL Z
E] ~ bJ
7 ~ '~ C3
CL
¢ ,u -P
O -1 O
Ld I-- ,J F--
~ ~ Cg
_J W Z W
C, C, C,
0- O,
· t o r-- C,
l".l Z C'.l
C, - C, C,
>-
Z
T
~-- Z ~
N Z (]: '¢
Z
3 WO-
~ _j Z
,:, C, O ,,D
_10- n0-
<[\ ~-~"--
C'l ~-4 ~ 111
r"j0' ELO" I--O-
C, C. C,
03 /
N ~ LLt
O J Z
S"~T n~ CLI"-
("'1 r,.
00' ,D ~. C,
0-C. 0-C,
0- 0- 0-
C, C. C,
C. ,C, O
.0 I'- 130
b] b]
b3 b3 b3
:R o o
O
C. C. O
C, ,C, ,_, ,_, C, C,
,:'..::: .S .S ,3 .j j
O ,C, C, C, ,'-':, C,2, C, 0 Z
,C, C, C, ,::. O ,C C:, :',. C,
.S ,S ,:: ,.:_: .:: ;:;.:'...S c: ,:'.
I:'-I C, C'4 C., C, -O q- CO 0' ,C, b3 b0 b3 ¢ -O q" ,C, r-
b-- ~ H C, ,:l ,::, ITJ r~ ~- r-,- q:l H ,c, C' b] ij'j "~ ['-
I"- '~ 0' C' C' ~ H '.0 '.~ C'4 C'i C"4 -~ 0J i;~ q' 0"
CrJ03
'-,' 1:21 hltd
o-c7- :; zz ,'-.,-,.
HI-- Z EEL
ZZ LLI010]
¢~ l'] [_1[] OOn Q_
LLJ Ld 7 '7 ~- b_ "- '-,
._;...,.;z c,_ ,:,_ .J m ,, w
33 E · WW Ux _j
c,.,', ~; o ~ -_j
~F~ Z 4J 4~ W i J3 03 i~'
Ir ~ 0 C] 0 t'3 t') 0 I:.B -_J 0 [O U
00 I'- i" F'-
OO - bJGEhF-H rr'O:
zz :~ ~' = o;'m '. zw ....
~ U EL n.
¢ ~: W ~ W <][: ¢ W
/ J r- J r' <3: (/: r
Q..Q. O ¢ Or_gEE O ~'T'~T.:]2 O bJW
Z
C. ,C. C. ,', .', 'D 0 C, ,C, ,S, '3' ,:,
C"l C'l 03 ~ -r C' C, _J t") &' t-':, b3 b3 '.Q -0
H ~ ~' .'~ (3 t"l t") l:L ,,~ C"J ,'~
\'% hi\ rK--.\ A\'-,'-,'-,\ O",-',-
0'0" I--Or- 34-0 30-c0Cr-r--r'-
C, C, [ 0 C' I:L O C' 03 C' 'C' ':' ':;' C, >~ C' 'C.
>-
LLI 01 >' LLI IJj
03 I--
~ > Z ~ LL
CL ~ ~ t~: O C' C' h t"3 ~ t":' t) t":' J
~ C' '3' U C' 'C' O
W C' C, 3 C, C, C' C, C, 'C, C, O
F--O-0 LI hlO-O-
Z Ld i~ ~ Z
Ld C' C, 01 'D ~ C' O ~ C' C' O C' C' E C. C,
0"0' Cr- gl0'~' O10'0'0'0'0' Lda'-0"
01"-"-. bJ'- ~"--'-- ~\"--"-\'- ]:"'-'-
EL0'I> I:L0" ~g-0' ~0'-0-1]'CD~ 030'0'
C, C. C, O '_, C, C, O C, O O C,
F- O I::l 0
Z hJ O w4 03
Ld~ 03 U 03
03 .:, C, LLI CC
03 ["4 .,--4 O W W C' C' C'
LLI ["4 C"i H } tx O' ) I I I I I ¢ C' ,,'>
t:L ~ ~ N ~-i r,-' t.:t H fr '0 -TJ O) I> Q' 03 U3 U3
/ / ,0 03 It' OEI h 0" h3 U3 C"l ['1
'3 ¢ ¢ 0 m 0 ~ ~ C' O' O' 0" 130 CO C' O' O'
0" O' O' 0"
C' C, C' '-' C'
C' C, C' ':' C,
.,-4 ,,-4 ,,-4 .,~
O' C, ["i
C'I t.':, ~ t.')
h3 113 I J3 b3 b3
h3 h3 h3 h3 h3
C,
,5 ,5 :~: ,~:
O
LlJ W
o
F-
'G
r
O
-O
L.U ~ |
Fi 0-
Q_
Ld
J
Ld
Z
EEC.,
LdC~
F- Ol
:3 H
crj o-
O
C~
Ld
T
F-
~0'
O3
O'
C>
IO
:?
:?
0
L
CI
t
LI
C., .2, C,
,2, ,2, .~.
S c-: ,£
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER %
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT
CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL
MARY JANE HENRY - FINANCE DEPARTMENT
OCTOBER 9, 1990
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ENROLLMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled a Resolution of Intention No. 90 - to
approve a contract between the Board of Administration of the Public
Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of
Temecula.
Direct the City Manager to execute a Certification of Governing Body's
Action.
Introduce an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF
THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
DISCUSSION: The City is currently in the process of entering the Public Employees'
Retirement System (PERS). The attached Resolution of Intention is the next step in
this process.
FISCAL IMPACT: The PERS actuarial study indicates a contribution of 14.242% of
the FY 1990-91 budgeted gross salary of $1,593,216 or $226,906.
RESOLUTION NO.90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA GIVING NOTICE OF INTENTION TO
APPROVE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public
agencies in the Public Employees' Retirement System, making their employees members of said
System, and sets forth the procedure by which participation may be accomplished; and
WHEREAS, one of the steps required in the procedure is the adoption by the Governing
Body of the Public Agency of a resolution giving notice of intention to approve a contract for
such participation between said Governing Body and the Retirement System Board of
Administration, which resolution shall contain a summary of the major provisions of the
proposed retirement plan; and
WHEREAS, attached is a summary of the major provisions of the proposed plan:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Governing Body of the above
agency gives, and it does hereby give notice of intention to approve a contract between said
governing Body and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System,
providing for participation of said agency in said Retirement System, a copy of said contract and
a copy of the summary of the major provisions of the proposed plan being attached hereto, as
an "Exhibit", and by this reference made a part hereof.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 9th day of October, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
3,rP, eaosl06
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 90- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 9th day of October, 1990, by the following roll call vote.
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMBMEBERS:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
3/Resosl06
Public Employees' Retirement System
Public Agency Contract Services
Contract Services Division - Section 220
Post O~fice Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
Telephone (916) 326-3420
326-3000 (Talecommunications
Device for the Dea~)
CERTIFICATION OF GOVERNING SODYeS ACTION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy
Resolution adopted by the
(Governing Body]
the
(Name of Public Agency]
On ·
(Date]
CITY CLZRK or
Secretary of the ~oard
FCSD-CON-12
C0600 (Rev. 11/88)
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That a Contract between the City Council of the City of Temecula and
the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby
authorized, a copy of said Contract being attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" , and by such
reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.
SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized, empowered, and
directed to execute said Contract for and on behalf of said Agency.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption, and
prior to the expiration of 15 days from the passage thereof shall be published at least twice in
the Californian, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of
Temecula and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFFED, this _ day of October, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEALI
3/Orda 03
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 90- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 9th day of October, 1990, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 30th day of
October, 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
3lOrds 03
EXHIBIT A
In consideration of the covenants and agreement hereafter contained and on the
part of both parties to be kept and performed, the governing body of above
public agency, hereafter referred to as "Public Agency", and the Board of
Administration, Public Employees' Retirement System, hereafter referred to as
"Board", hereby agree as follows:
All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age"
shall mean age 60 for local miscellaneous members.
Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after making its
employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to
all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as
apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided
for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except
those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election
of a contracting agency.
Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
local miscellaneous members).
In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not
become members of said Retirement System:
a. SAFETY ]~PLOYEES.
*** COPY ***
O
The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member
shall be determined in accordance with Section 21251.13 of said
Retirement Law (2% at age 60 Full).
Public Agency elected to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
a. Section 20024.2 (One-Year Final Compensation).
Sections 21263, 21263.1 and 21263.3 (Post-Retirement Survivor
Allowance).
Sections 21380-21387 (1959 Survivor Benefits) including Section
21382.2 (Increased 1959 Survivor Benefits).
Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the
contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future
service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members of said
Retirement System.
Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as
follows:
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one in-
stallment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs
of administering said System as it affects the employees of
Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or
of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one in-
stallment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
*** COPY ***
10.
Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days
after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as
may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the
correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper
adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances.
Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any
employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the
Board.
BY
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION ~
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ~M M
(i~ TE
PUBLIC M EM
PERS-CON-702 (NEW AGENCY)
(Rev. 5/89)
CITY COUNCIL
OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY
Presiding Officer
Witness Date
Attest:
Clerk
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Public Agency Contract Services
Contract Services Division - Section 220
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
Telephone (916) 326-3420
326-3000 (Telecommunications
Device for the Deaf)
EXHIBIT B
CONTRACT OF CITY OF TEMECULA
WIT]] TBE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
FOR MAKING AN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS STATED ~RREIN
By this AGREEMENT made this 5th day of July , 19 90 , in accordance
with and subject to the provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law by
and between the City Council of the
City of Temecula ,
hereinafter referred to as Agency, and the Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as System, Agency and System agree as follows:
Ae
Agency herewith retains the services of System to perform the valuation(s)
required by Section 20453 of the Public Employees' Retirement Law for the
purpose of determination by the Board of Administration of the Public
Employees' Retirement System of the contributions to be made by Agency if
agency adopts a contract with said Board which provides for benefits as
described in Attachment A. ~
Agenc~ will pay $ 154.00 plus $6.00 per employee to System upon
completion of the actuarial valuation, such fee being based on the
number of persons and membership categories involved·
C. Any and all data and information requested by System from Agency for use in
compilation of this valuation shall be furnished ~o System by Agency upon
request by System. The actuarial tables and p~ocedures to be used in the
valuation shall be in accordance with the tables approved by said Board of
Administration· System shall have sole control of the valuation and its
judgement in the determination thereof shall be final and conclusive. All
work sheets and final results and reports, the product of the valuation,
shall be and remain the property of the System.
abo e written.
Witness our hands the day and year first u_._..D/l~ /
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ~ CITY OF TEMEC A
CHIEF, CONTRACT ~ERVIC N
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
TITLE C~ ~t]~ fi~4~ C'
Contract Valuation
FCSD-CON-6A
C0706A (Rev. 9/89)
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Employees' Retirement SyStem
Public Agency Contract Services
!'ContraCtiServices Division, Section 220
-p.O,.Box1942709
"."~acramento~. CA 94229-2709
"'-Telephone (916) 326-3420
326-3000 (Telecommunications
Device for the Deaf)
Following is a summary of benefits and exclusions which are included in all
contracts and a display og benefits and benefit formulas which will be
utilized in the actuarial calculation for your agency,
Retirement law provides the following benefits in each contractx
Three highest years final compensation average* *' ',~ '*
Pre-Retirement Death Benefit - 1957 Survivor Benef'it
Post-Retirement Death Benefit - $500 lump sum payment*
,. ~,,:/.~.' =.~..-.
You are permitted to contract with PERS by category. This meanS' ~hat you are
not required to include Police*and Fire and Miscellaneous, **However, all'em-
ployees in a covered category must be members of the Retirement System unless
they are specifically excluded by:theGovernment Code as ~ollowsz
- appointment or em~loymenttcontract"fixes a term of full-time,
continuous employment of six months~or'less.'
- Employees serving on a part-time basis where his position requires
service for less than an average of 20 hour[ a week.
- Persons in employment which, in the opinion of the board, is on a
seasonal, limited-term, on-call,'em~rgency, intermittent, substitute,
or other ~rregular basis until the employee works more than 125 days
or.l,000 hours within the fiscal year. = :" : ":
- CETA employees.hired after July l, 1979, if they are inp0sitions that
would otherwise qualify them as PERS miscellaneous members (non-safety).
.CET& employees hired into safety positions such as policemen or'=firemen
are not excluded from PERS membership. '
*Please refer to the PERS Handbook,
'i
FCSD-CON-19M
C0712 (Rev. 4/89)
-1-
(See Reverse)
DATEs June 26, 1990
1.0 EMPLOYER CODE
AGENCY NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT CO,PY '
'~ R~:BPrnBtd]~o' F~P]d 0ffic,,
: ' ' ' MISCELLAN~U9
3.0 COVI.~AGE GROUP
4.0 COVERAGE SINCE
SOC $BC=COVERAGv4
5.1 ..EFFECtIVe, DATE
5.2 DIVISION DATE
5.3 TERMIN&TION DATE
5.4 EXCLUSIONS
,**
Rg'rlRi24Etff COVERAGEs .... ..
~ORMUI~ -. , ..
&CCOUI~ .CODE
PRIOR S~VIC~ t .....
IR CO~ ~fE
2% @ 60 Full
O0
100%
7%
.' .. ~-.-,.j ' ~,-'.. "~4,;z .... ,-.'... ': ;;,.i. .'.,..;- .'-;:--~..'.'"
Section 20835,r -. Limi~ Prior. Ser 'cej'~
~o HemberS ~ployed on Con~Eac[-- a~e"' , . , ' ' ...~', .-. ' ' i '~ -~~ b'i' h %~ ~'e~ 'f""
Sec'Llon 2OO24.2 - One-Year - Final, Compensation.
Survivor Allowance.' "' ~"' ,'~i'~.'.'~.*'," ;~' ,~'( '~,'.:t-.- .... ""'
Sections' 21380 -.21387 195~ SurviVor:..;'. ',~.
--.
Benefits .~ includin8 .... ; :" ~,,~ ~ '" ~"' ',f'-I I~. ".' ,~' ?. ,' i','., ~,"~ r~. i"~A'~,'i .;'~'
~' Section 21382.2.~-. Increased.~LeVel
1959 ,survivor. Benefits '..'~.; ",.A :".~i'l' ~,;~..~'o '>"~ ,-~,~,, b.~i .!~6'~a-~.;"
" -.-
i
'
/~SHZP ' ' ' .':,. "~.,
I,OCAh SYSTEM
13.1 MONEY TRNSFRD TO EMPLOYEE'S ACCOUNT
13.2 EMPLOYER NONEJt TRNSFRD
13.3 INACTIVES TRNSFRD
13.4 RETIRED ~IVES TRNSFRD
No
FCSD-CON-19M
,C0712 (Rev. 4/89) -2-
";PERS
Contract Seaices ~vision
P,O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709
(916) 326-3420
326-3000 (Telecommunications
Device for the Deaf)
EXHIBIT C
!Reply to Section 220
.Public Agency Contract Services
Contract Services ,Division
SUNNY OF MAJOR PROVISIONS
2% @ 60 (1/50) Formula.(Section 21251.13) ~
Local Miscellaneous Members , .. :
SERVICE RETIREMENT ~{ ....
Members credited with at least five years service may retire upon attaining
age 50. There is no compulsory retirement age.
The monthly retirement allowance is determined by age at retirement., years
of service credit, and final compensation. The basic benefit is 2% of final
compensation for each year of credited service upon retirement at age 60.
If retirement is earlier than age 60, the percentage of final.compensation
for each quarter year is decreased. If retirement is deferred beyond age 60,
the percentage of final compensation for each quarter year of age,~increases
to age 63.
Final compensation is the average monthly salary (full-time rate excluding
overtime) during: 1) the final 36 consecutive months preceeding separation
from employment, unless the member designates another 36 consecutive month
period; or, 2) if provided by the employer's contract, during theil2.
consecutive months preceeding retirement or separation, unless the member
requests another 12 consecutive month period.
DISABILITY RETIREMENT ; :I ;. , ', a..
Members permanently incapacitated from performing their duties are eligible
for disability retirement if they have at least five years service credit.
The monthly retirement allowance is 1.8% of final compensation for each year
of service. Employees who have between 10.000 and 18.519. years se, rvice.credit
may receive up to one-third of their final compensation. If provided by the
employer's contract, the benefit would be a minimum of 30% of final
compensation for five years of service credit and 1% of:final compensation for
each additional year of service to a maximum benefit of 50% of final
compensation. The disability retirement allowance cannot exceed the allowance
payable upon retirement for service at age 60, if employment could be continued
to that age. If the member is eligible for serv. ice retirement, ,the service
allowance is payable if greater than the disability allowance. , ....
INDUSTRIAL DISABILITY RETIREMENT , . . .: .... : . .~ ... ;. ~.. ,, ~ .. i -,
If provided by the employer's contract, members permanently incapacitated from
performing their duties as a result of a job-related injury or illness receive
50% of their final compensation (or more by additional contract provisions).
Employees who enter miscellaneous membership after January 1, 1980, are limited
to the amount they would have received for service retirement, had they con-
tinued to work until age 63. If the member is eligible for service retirement,
the service allowance is payable if greater than the industrial disability
allowance.
FCSD-CON-44
C10027 (Rev. 7/89)
Public Employees' Retirement System
Public Agency Contract Services
Contract Services Division - Section 220
Post Office Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229-2709 ·
Telephone (916) 326-3420
326~3000 (Talecommunications
Device for the Deaf)
CERTIFICATION OF COHPLXANCEWITH
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7507
I hereby certify that in accordance with Section 7507 of the Government
Code the future annual costs as determined by the System Actuary and/or the
increase in retirement benefit(s| have been made public at a public meeting
by the Of
(governing body) (public agency)
at least two weeks prior to the adoption of the final Ordinance/Resolution.
Datex
original signature
official title
PERS-CON-I2A (Rev. 11/88)
C0601
ITEM NO.
5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CiTY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Engineerin9 Department
October 9, 1990
Acceptance of Public Improvements in
Tract No. 20319
PREPARED BY:
R ECOMMEN DAT I ON:
DISCUSSION:
Robert Righetti
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in
Tract No. 20319, AUTHORIZE the reduction of street,
sewer, and water bonds and release of monument bond,
and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
On March 15, 1988, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with:
Kaufman and Broad of
Southern California, Inc.
11601 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90025
for the improvement of streets, the installation of sewer
and water systems, and survey monumentation.
Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety
bonds issued by:
American Casualty Company of Reading, PA
as follows:
Bond No. 7005436 in the amount of $576,500.00 to
cover street improvements.
Bond No. 7005436 in the amount of $225,500.00 to
cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. 7005436 in the amount of $147,000.00 to
STAFFRPT\TM2 0 3 19 1
cover water improvements.
Bond No. 7005437 in the amount of $30,600.00 to
cover survey monumentation.
Bond No. 7005436 in the amount of $474,500.00 to
cover materials and labor.
The following items have been completed by the developer
or his engineer in accordance with the approved plans:
1. Required street, sewer, and
improvements.
water
2. Survey Monumentation.
The inspection and verification process relating to the
above items has been completed by the County of Riverside
Road Department and City Staff agrees with the
recommendation to reduce/re~ease the subdivision
improvement bonds. Therefore, it is appropriate to
reduce/re~ease these bonds as follows:
Streets:
Sewer:
Water:
IV)onumentation:
$518,850.00
$202,950.00
$132,300.00
$ 30,600.00
The remaining 10% of the original faithful performance
bond amounts are to be retained for one (1) year
guarantee period as follows:
Streets: $57,650.00
Sewer: $22,550.00
Water: $14,700.00
RR:ks
STAFFRPT\ TM2 0 3 19 2
VAC.
GOLF
COURSE
.... _., ,:;: :.
' , ,"e, .; -.,;.. ."
.... ,.; , ..'~:!.. !.
'~.., .,.
..
. .
:OURSE
~!..
VICINITY MAP
'ixlOT 'I'0 SCALE
ITEM
NO.
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 9, 1990
Plot Plan No. 11669, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633
PREPARED BY:
Mark Rhoades
R ECOMMEN DAT I ON:
Uphold Plannin9 Commission's Approval of Plot Plan No.
11669 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Wescon Properties
REPRESENTATIVE:
J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
PROPOSAL:
Subdivide 7.2 acres into 4 parcels and construct 4
industrial buildings in the M-SC zone.
LOCAT ION:
Southwesterly side of Business Park Drive, north of
Rancho California Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
M-SC (Manufacturing - Service Commercial)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: M-SL (Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
South: M-SC (Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
East: M-SC { Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
West: M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
PROPOSED ZONING:
No change requested.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
North:
South:
East:
West:
industrial Building
construction )
Vacant
Vacant
industrial Building
No. of Acres:
No. of Buildings:
7.2
lunder
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633 and Plot Plan No.
11669 were heard by the Plannin9 Commission on
September 17, 1990. The proposal is to subdivide
7.2 acres into four parcels and construct a four unit
industrial office park.
The Commission had concerns relative to parking
and the proposed landscape screen adjacent to the
truck loading areas. The proposed parking exceeds
the requirements of Ordinance 348. CC&R's will be
recorded for the project to insure future shared
access and parking area.
Landscaping adjacent to the truck loading areas will
be increased in order to provide better buffering.
Additionally, the proposed landscape plans will
require final approval under a separate plot plan
permit.
The Commission approved Plot Plan No. 11669 and
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633 by a vote of 5-0.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council UPHOLD the
Planning Commission's APPROVAL of Plot Plan No.
11669 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633.
MR:ks
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 2
~t ~ v .'~~ ~~~'~'ed t~e cnmmlsmlon tna-'the
R,}aO O d]d not condltion him to bui[F' the
dt e
curb and qutt 32' of street_ imProvem~ 'ts to expedite
CO~ISSIONE~ FORD titled that Mr. c ,dahl was provjd3nq
aDnroximateky 80% street imp-,vements and these
improvements wou]~ k no beneli,' to his property. He
suqaested that Mr. HaL
COMM1'~S]ONER FAHEY moved~. Be the public hearing,
seconded by CO~ISSIONER HO~ ~ND and carried unanimously.
AYES: 5 COMMI ERS: Blair. Fahey,
NOES: 0 .~]=1~ I SS I iWI~ None
COMMISSIONER F~EY .~ to adopt the '~, ~ative Declaration
for Parcel MaD No./3969 and approve ~..el MaD No. 23969,
based on the ana~ ~-is ~[.[~e~: ~: ~..Staff Report and
subject tn ~h~_- ~-~'~' . ___ ..... '-.11% ~d by the
..... ~i]e~n. ,. ' No. 29, seconded ~ ~O~ISSIOMER
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
5.1
Ford,
~..
Proposal to subdivide 7.2 acres into four parcels and
construct an industrial park on the west side of Business
Park Drive, north of Rancho California Road.
MIM. 9/IV/90 -7- 9/21/90
J~.ANNINc~ COMM|SSION M[NI1Tt,T.S ,SF':'P"PP:.M:~'~ ': 7 .
~ouOtV; however , the cn~lr~ v c'c, mh'~n~a t~e aDO[ ~cat]ons
~n~' t~ntat]ve parcel. mad ~5633. T~e applicant has
reo~estefl t.hat the Plot Plan an~ the tentative Parcel
mad rema].n separate to expedite construction of the
Dro~ect .
Oilvet Mui]ca stated t,at ConO3t~on No. 22, Daoe 3,
o~ the Cond].t].ons of APPrOVal for Tentative Parcel
MaD No. 25633, did not DefraUD to th]s Droiect and
therefore should be de].eted.
COMMTSSIONKR HOAGI,AND auestioD~d the parking reauirements
for each 1. ndividua[ building. He stated that the staff
report ~nflicates that some bu~]d~nos have more parking
than others. OLIVKR MUJICA stated that the Dro~ect would
utilize snare~ DarkinO, an~ there would be no designated
Darkin~ spaces f~r each bui].dinO. GARY THORNHILL
suooeste~ that the CC&R's shou]d incorporate the shared
Dark].n~ requirement.
WARREN JAMES, Wescon Properties, provided the Commission
with information reqardinQ the project. Mr. James
requested the fo]low3n~ Conditions Of APproval be amended:
Plot Plan No. ~1669, Condition No. 7 amended to read "A
m~n~mum of 39? Darkin~ spaces": Condition No. 22 amended
to read "County GeoLogist's Report dated July 3, 1989 as
amended."; Condition No. 24 amended to read "guarantee the
installation of walls and fences"; Condition No. 27
amended to read "If fees have not been paid, prior to
issuance"; Condition No. 28 amended to read "County
GeoloQ~st's Report dated July 3, 1989 as amended.";
Condition No. 42, Mr. James asked if the fee was set;
Condit3on No. 43, Mr. James requested that this Condition
be deleted from the Plot Plan however, to remain in the
Conditions of Approval for the Tentative Parcel Map;
Condition No. 44, CATV deleted; Condition No. 47,
Mr. James Questioned the amount of the fee; and Condition
No. 49, Mr. James requested that this item be deleted;
Tentative Tract Map No. 25633, Condition No. 41 amended
to read "In the event that bonds and agreements do not
exist, the subdivider"; Condition No. 42 be amended to
MIM .9/17/90 -8- 9/21/90
SEP'PEN,q.T~:,'&' i'/, ~990
aF:,~en t-,at tnP [:OTIe'lt'lC}~ rP~d "lt t. hP nroOer'ty fal
w~tnLn the 100 year tLood ol. ane"
aOHN MIDDLETON adv3sed Mr, James that the fee referenced
tn Condition No. 42 of the PLot PLan would be $2,500 per
acre. that Condor]on No. 49 of the Plot Plan was a
standard condition. ~r. MiddLeton advised Mr..lames that
the Project was ~n Flood Zone B and fall within the 100
year flood plane therefore, Condition No. 57 of the
Tentative Parcel Map would remain as stated.
CO~HISSIONER CHINIAEFF auestioned the City Attorney if the
reaujrement for CC&R's under the Plot Plan would provide
the reauirement for reciprocal parking. Assistant City
Attnrney, LOIS BOHACK stated that the agreement for
reciprocal Darkina would be under the CC&R's, and the
CC&R's for the Plot Plan and the Tentative Parcel Map
were the same.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF also exPresseO concern for the
screenino of the truck loading ramps from the adjacent
properties. MR. JAMES suggested that the screening of
these ramps be aDDroVed by the Planning Director.
COMMISSIONER HOAGI,AND advised the P]annjno D~rector and
staff of discrepancies in the Section 3 of the
Environmental Checklist.
COMMISSIONER FORD suggested that Condition No. 23 and
Condition No. 48 of the Plot Plan should be coinciding.
GARY THORNHILL suggested that Condition No. 23 be
modified to indicate a stripin~ plan for the interior
parking and entrance improvements along with street
improvement ~lan.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing,
seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAMD and carried unanimously.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
None
MIN.9/17/90
-9-
9/21/90
P~,ANNINC~ COMMIS,~ION MINII','~:.~; SEP?F. NP~RR !7. :1990
ttn~t~qs contained ]~ the start report and sub~ect to
Cond~tlons of ~OOrOVal aS modified: Plot e~an No. 11669,
Condttto~s ot ~o~oval. No, '1 to ~ematn as ~s; ~o. 22
to read "Report date~ ~tlJy 3, 1989 as~',amended"'; ~o. 23 to
~ead "on-s~te s~qnin~ and strto~nq"; No. 24 to remain as
written: No. 77 tn read "~ the fee has not been
No. 28 ~ead "Reon~t dated aul. y 3, 1989 as amended"; No.
43 dejete~; No. 49 to remaln as wrltten; Tentative Parcel
MaD No. 95633, Condor. tons o~ ADDsovaL ~o. 22 deleted; No.
31 to remain as written with the a~itjon o~ a CC&R
a~reement tot addtttonal space; ~o. 4[ to read "'In the
event bond does not exist"; No. 42 to read "In the
event bond does not exist": and ~o. 47 to remain as
written. COH~ISSIONgR BT,~IR seconded the motion.
CO~ISS[ONgR HOAGI,~NO ~e~uested. that Condition No. 43
of the Plot P]an remain as written, and
CHIR[~gF? stated he to would [t~e to see the CC&R's
remain on the Plot Plan. CO~IBS]O~RR ~gY amended
he~ motto~ to reflect Condition ~o. 43 o[ the PLot
plan to remain as ~ritten, seconded by CO~ISSIONgR
Bh~[R and carried unanimously.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey
Ford, Hoagland,
Chlniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
RECESS
CHAIRMAN DENNIS CRINIAEFF declared a recess a 8:15 P.M.
meeting reconvened at 8:25 P.M.
The
6. PLOT PLAN NO. 11620
6.1
Proposal to construct a two story office building
with 23,450 square feet of floor area, 17,675 leaseable
on the northerly side of Enterprise Circle north abutting
Santa Gertrudis Creek. SCOTT WRIGHT presented the staff
report on this ~tem.
MIN.g/17/90
-10- 9121190
CiTY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No. 11669
Council Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planni
1.
nq Department
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the City Council approval
date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantia) utilization contemplated
by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 11669, or as amended by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed on-site so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way, and shall comply
with Ordinance No. 655.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to 9row higher than thirty (30)
inches.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall
submit seven (7) copies of parkin9, landscapin9, shading and irrigation plot
plan to the Plannin9 Department and shall be accompanied by a filin9 fee as set
forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348.
A minimum of 395 parking spaces shall be provided, in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three (3)
inches on four 14) inches of Class II base.
A minimum of 15 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Each parking
space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or
equal, displayin9 the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not
be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior
end of the parkin9 space at a minimum of height of 80 inches from the bottom
STAFF R PT\T PM25633 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
of the sign to the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign
shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street
parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not
less than one (1) inch in height, which clearly and conspicuously states the
following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning "
I n addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue
paint of at least three ~3) square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Engineering Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of
the Department of Building and Safety.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees
along the streets, and within the parking areas.
This project site is within a significant groundshaking zone. Mitigation shall
be the application of the proper Uniform Building Code standards in the
development of this project. Mitigations outlined in the approved Gootechnical
Report shall be adhered to. Evidence of compliance with those conditions shall
be presented to the Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of
any building permit by the Temecula Department of Building and Safety, a
California Licensed Structural Engineer shall certify that the intended
structure or building is safe and structurally integrated. This certification
shall be based upon, but not limited to, the site specific seismic, geologic and
geotechnical conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development
is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated.
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated May 24, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 2
!-5,
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
25.
26.
The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in
the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated April 29, 1990, a
copy of which is attached. if the project lies within an adopted flood control
drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division
Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined
in the County Fire Department's letter dated September 4, 1990, a copy of
which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated May 1, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated May 16, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lightin9 Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan,
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern
Municipal Water District transmittal dated August 24, 1989, a copy of which
is attached,
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Southern
California Edison Company transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy of which
is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County
Geologist's Report dated July 3, 1989, as amended.
Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, an on-site signin9 and striping plan
alon9 with a street improvement plan shall be approved by the City Engineer,
Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to
be determined by the Director of Buildin9 and Safety to guarantee the
installation of planrings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the plantin9 for one year shall be filed with
the Director of Buildin9 and Safety.
Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and
irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Buildin9 and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in 9ood workin9 order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground,
STAFF R PT\ TPM25633 3
If the fee has not been paid prior to the issuance of a grading or building
permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663
by paying the appropriate fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance
No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior
to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance no. 663, the applicant shall
pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by
County ordinance or resolution. Said fee shall not apply to the entire site,
but rather to the new building and parking structure.
28.
No building or portion thereof shall be permitted within the fault hazard zone
identified in the County Geologist's letter dated July 3, 1990, as amended.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
29.
All site plans, 9radin9 plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
30.
The developer shall submit four (4) copies of a soils report to the Engineerin9
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
31.
The developer shall submit four (4) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineerin9 Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Buildin9 Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
32.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
33.
The site is in an area identified on the flood hazards maps as Flood Zone "B"
subject to floodin9 depth of 12" during a 100 year storm event. All building
needs to be protected from this hazard.
34.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any 9radin9 outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
35.
No 9radin9 shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially
complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer.
ST A F F R PT\ T PM25633 4
36.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
37.
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
38.
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site.
39.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit.
41.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside Standard
No. 207.
43.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 5
fi
The applicant shah obtain clearance and/or permits from the following
agencies:
Rancho California Water District
City Engineer
Environmental Health
Fire Department
Planning Department
Riverside County Flood Control
Eastern Municipal Water District
Riverside Transit Agency
CATV Franchise
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
Business Park Drive shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located
28 feet from centerline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 39 foot half-
width dedicated right-of-way in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 111, {56/78).
46.
I n the event that full half street improvements plus a lane are not constructed
for Business Park Drive prior to issuance of Certification of Occupancy by the
developer of Parcel Map No. 19580, the applicant shall construct those
required improvements. Adjacent to the project and to the intersection of
Single Oak Drive.
47.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 6
49.
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Pavement stripin9, markin9, traffic and street name signin9 shall be installed
per requirements of the Traffic Engineer.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
ST A FF R PT\T PM25633 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633
Council Approval Date:
Ex.oiration Date:
Planni
1.
ng Department
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 25633, which action is brought within the time period provided
for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460,
Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved
tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date
unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision
Map Act, Subdivision Ordinance 460.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer·
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All
offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility
access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the parcel
map boundary to a City maintained road.
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 1
Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building
Code shall be submitted to the City Department of Building and Safety.
10.
11.
The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated May 24, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated April 29, 1990,
a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood
control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land
Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage
facilities shall be collected by the City prior to recordation of the final map or
waiver of parcel map.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated September ~, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
12.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated May 1, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
13.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated May 16, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
14.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
15.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern
Municipal Water District transmittal dated August 24, 1989, a copy of which
is attached.
16.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
Southern California Edison Company transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy
of which is attached.
17.
Subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County
Geolagist's Report dated July 3, 1989.
18.
Prior to recordation of this map, a reciprocal access agreement shall be
recorded for Parcels 2 and 3.
19.
Prior to recordation of this map, a signing and striping plan along with a
street improvement plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
20.
Prior to occupancy, developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements
and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, includin9 that for
STAFF R PT\T PM25633 2
traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EI R/ Negative
Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of
the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not
been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building
permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been
provided to developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may
require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming
benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its
right to protest such increase.
GRADING:
21.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should
Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation
Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation
Plan as implemented by City Ordinance or resolution.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
22.
23.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Planning Department.
24.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the M-SC zone.
25.
All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum area of 10,000
square feet.
26.
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a
net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility
easement.
27.
All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of
Ordinance 460.
STAFF R PT\ T PM25633 3
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
28.
Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the following conditionis) shall be
complied with:
A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be
transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS:
29.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final
map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with the City. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the
ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to
the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The
following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. Light and 91are may adversely impact operations at the
Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure sodium lamps
that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the
horizontal plane passing through the luminare."
indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject
property as of the date of recordation of the final map.
The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor.
No buildin9 permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any
building in Parcel Map No. 25633 until the developer or the developer's
successors-in-interest or assignees, provides evidence of compliance
with the terms of said agreement for the financing of public facilities.
"This property is affected by earthquake faulting and ground fissures.
Structures for human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault and
Cround Fissure Hazard Area."
"County Geologic Report No. 601 was prepared for this property on
September 2, 1988 by Schaefer Dixon Associates, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern are
as follows: earthquake faulting, fissuring and ground subsidence,
seismic design of structures, liquefaction, and uncompacted trench
backfill."
STA F F R PT\T PM25633 4
EncJineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
30.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL:
31.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City
Engineer and City Attorney· The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CC&R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and
perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
STAFFR PT\TPM25633 5
In addition to the above, the CC&R's shall include the following:
1. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements
ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads,
drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the
issuance of building permit where no map is involved.
h. The CC&R's shall facilitation shared access and common parking
requirements.
32. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following a~Jencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
33.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460.
34.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained
by a property owners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Pianning and Engineering
Department.
35.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit, if required, shall be installed to CATV
Standards at time of street improvements.
36. Dedication shall be made of the following ri9ht-of-way on the following
streets:
DEDICATE Business Park Drive TO 39 FEET FROM STREET CENTERLINE
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
37.
Business Park Drive shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located
28 feet from centerline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 39 foot half-
width dedicated right-of-way in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 111, 156/78 ).
38.
In the event that full half street improvements plus a lane are not constructed
for Business Park Drive prior to issuance of Certification of Occupancy by the
developer of Parcel Map No. 19580, the applicant shall construct those
required improvements adjacent to the project and to the intersection of Single
Oak Drive.
STAFFR PT\TPM25633 6
39.
4O.
41.
42.
45.
46.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the E)RJNegative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
All road easements andJor street dedications shall be offered for dedication to
the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
City Engineer.
In the event bond does not exist, the subdivider shall construct or post
security 9uaranteein9 the construction of the followin9 public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
signing, striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities·
c. Landscapin9 (street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
In the event bond does not exist, the subdivider shall provide bonds and
agreement clearances from all applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the
approval of the map.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoinin9 developments.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoinin9 the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineerin9 Department a cash sum established per lot as mitigation for a
traffic signal impact.
Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring
said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
STAFF R PT\T PM25633 7
48,
50.
51,
52.
53.
54.
55,
No grading shall take place prior to the recording of the final map.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
It is understood that the Tentative Map correctly shows all existing
easements, traveled ways and drainage courses, and that their omission may
require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be and
an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans.
The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone,
therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a
Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer.
A minimum centerline grade shall be 0.50 percent.
Pavement stripin9, marking, traffic and street name signin9 shall be installed
per requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
56.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
57.
The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the
area within the 100-year floodplain.
58.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
STAFF R PT\T PM25633 8
Case No.:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 17, 1990
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633,
Plot Plan No. 11669
Prepared By: Mark Rhoades
Recommendation: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Wescon Properties
J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
Subdivide 7.2 acres into ~ parcels and construct
industrial buildings in the M-SC zone.
Southwesterly side of Business Park Drive, north of
Rancho California Road.
M-SC I Manufacturing - Service Commercial )
North: M-SC (Manufacturing -
Commercial )
South: M-SC (Manufacturing -
Commercial )
East: M-SC (Manufacturing -
Commercial )
West: M-SC (Manufacturing -
Commercial )
Service
Service
Service
Service
No change requested.
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Industrial Building
construction )
Vacant
Vacant
Industrial Building
lunder
No. of Acres:
No. of Buildings:
7.2
LI.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 1
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The original application for this proposal was filed
at the County of Riverside. Two applications were
filed, one for a plot plan, and one for a tentative
parcel map. The County combined the applications
under Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633. The
applicant has expressed his desire to keep the two
applications separate. in the event of approval,
construction could begin on the plot plan without
waiting for the finalization of the parcel map.
Conditions of Approval have been separated to
facilitate this process.
Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633 is a proposal to
subdivide 7.2 acres into ~ parcels. The existing
parcel is Lot 9 of Parcel Map No. 19580, which
created Rancho California Business Park. Proposed
Parcel No. 1 contains 2.6 net acres, Parcel No. 2
contains 1.3 net acres, Parcel No. 3 contains 1.2 net
acres, and proposed Parcel No. li contains 2.1 net
acres. All four proposed parcels exceed the
minimum lot size in the M-SC zone.
Sufficient infrastructure exists in the immediate'
area to facilitate the demand of the proposed
development.
Access to the westerly two lots will be created by
reciprocal agreement. CCF, R's for the proposed
development will require approval from the City
Attorney. Access to the general site will be taken
via Business Park Drive.
Plot Plan
The plot plan application is a proposal to construct
four J~) industrial buildings on 7.2 acres.
Adequate landscaping is provided on site, including
the 25 foot wide landscape easement required for the
Rancho California Business Park.
The building sizes, required parking, and provided
parking are provided in the following matrix:
Building No. 1:
Required Parking:
Provided Parking:
30, 128 sq. ft.
151 stalls
15q stalls
ST A FF R PT\T PM25633 2
Building No. 2:
Required Parking:
Provided Parking:
:21,836 sq.ft.
59 stalls, 2 loading
59 stalls, 2 loading
Building No. 3:
Required Parking:
Provided Parking:
21,836 sq.ft.
59 stalls, 2 loading
59 stalls, 2 loading
Building No. 4:
Required Parking:
Provided Parking:
45,983 sq. ft.
123 stalls, 4 loading
123 stalls, 4 loading
Building No. 1 does not require loading space
because it is proposed as an all office use. The
provided parking exceeds the requirements of the
ordinance.
All four proposed buildings are to reflect similar
contemporary architecture. The project is an
integrated industrial development. The buildings
will share access and thematic visual elements,
however, each parcel is self-sufficient with the
inclusion of adequate access agreements. The
access agreements will be provided under CC&R's..
Zoninq
The proposed plot plan and the tentative parcel map
are in conformance with Ordinance 348. The
proposed project meets the development standards
contained in the Manufacturing - Service Commercial
{Article 11) and Parking ISection 18.12).
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMI NAT ION:
The Southwest Area Plan designation for the
proposed site is LI, Light Industrial. The proposed
use is in conformance with this designation. Proper
access, infrastructure, and public facilities
improvements exist to support the proposed use.
An Initial Study has been completed for the project
and a Negative Declaration is recommended for the
proposal.
FINDINGS:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633
1. The proposed division is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan and Zoning Code in that
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 3
all four parcels exceed the minimum lot size of
IO,OOD square feet and the minimum average
lot width of 75 feet.
The lot design is logical and meets the
approval of the City's Planning and
Engineerin9 Departments.
The legal owner of record has offered to make
all dedications required·
The project will not have a significant
adverse affect on the environment· A
Negative Declaration is recommended and all
impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels
through recommended conditions of approval·
There is a reasonable probability that the
project will be consistent with the City's
General Plan once adopted, based on analysis
contained in the Staff Report.
The division of land is consistent with the
provision of Title 18 of the Subdivision Map
Act.
Plot Plan No. 11669
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 11669 will be consistent with the
City~s future adopted General Plan, which
will be completed in a reasonable time and in
accordance with State law.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare.
ST A F F R PT\ T PM25633 ~
10.
11.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, through appropriate
building mass reduction techniques and
landscape installation, and distance from
planned adjacent structures.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-d-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for this project.
The design of the project, the type of.
improvements, and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed project.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
MR: ks
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission recommend to City Council:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633, and
Plot Plan No. 11669;
2. APPROVE Tentative Parcel Map No.
25633; and,
APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11669.
based on the analysis and findings contained in the
Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions
of Approval.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 5
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No. 11669
Council Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the City Council approval
date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated
by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 11669, or as amended by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed on-site so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-d-way, and shall comply
with Ordinance No. 655.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30)
inches.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall
submit seven (7) copies of parking, landscaping, shading and irrigation plot
plan to the Planning Department and shall be accampanied by a filing fee as sat
forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. :3~8.
A minimum of 395 parking spaces shall be provided, in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3z18. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three (3)
inches on four I~) inches of Class II base.
A minimum of 15 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. Each perking
space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflect. orized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or
equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not
be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered st the interior
end of the parking space st a minimum of height of 80 inches from the bottom
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
of the sign to the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewaik. A sign
shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street
parking faci)ity, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not
less than one (1) inch in height, which clearly and conspicuousiy states the
following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue
paint of at least three (3) square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Engineering Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of
the Department of Building and Safety.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view.
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Screening
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees
along the streets, and within the parking areas.
This project site is within a significant groundshaking zone. Mitigation shall
be the application of the proper Uniform Building Code standards in the
development of this project. Mitigations outlined in the approved Geotechnical
Report shall be adhered to. Evidence of compliance with those conditions shall
be presented to the Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of
building permits.
This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of
any building permit by the Temecula Department of Building and Safety, a
California Licensed Structural Engineer shall certify that the intended
structure or building is safe and structurally integrated. This certification
shall be based upon, but not limited to, the site specific seismic, geologic and
geotechnical conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development
is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated.
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Deparlment~s transmittal dated May 24, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 2
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
25.
26.
The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in
the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated ApriJ 29, 1990, a
copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control
drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division
Ordinance l&60, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainm:Je faciJities
shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined
in the County Fire Department's letter dated September 4, 1990, a copy of
which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Land Use Section~s transmittat dated May 1, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittat dated May 16, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern'
Municipal Water District transmittal dated August 24, 1989, a copy of which
is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Southern
California Edison Company transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy of which
is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County
Geologist's Report dated July 3, 1989
Prior to issuance of occupancy peruits, a signing and striping plan along with
a street improvement plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to
be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of plantings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with
the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and
irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
ST A F F R PT\ T PM25633 3
27.
28°
Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate
fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee
required by Ordinance no. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by
the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution. Said fee shall not apply to the entire site, but rather to the new
building and parking structure.
No building or portion thereof shall be permitted within the fault hazard zone
identified in the County Geologist's letter dated July 3, 1990.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
29.
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
30.
The developer shall submit four I~) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
31.
The developer shall submit four I~) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2~"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
32.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
33.
The site is in an area identified on the flood hazards maps as Flood Zone
subject to flooding depth of 12" during a 100 year storm event. All building
needs to be protected from this hazard.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
35.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially
complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 ~
36.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
37.
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
38.
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site.
39.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid· The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge nee:Is to be paid.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
40. All work done within the City right-d-way shall have an encroachment permit.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside Standard
No. 207.
42.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
43.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions I CC&R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning. City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CCF, R's shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CCF, R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CCF, R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CCE, R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
The CCF, R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents·
The CCF, R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CCE, R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities·
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 5
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CCSR's, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonabte notice, may enter the property and
perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
The applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following
agencies:
Rancho California Water District
City Engineer
Environmental Health
Fire Department
Planning Department
Riverside County Flood Control
Eastern Municipal Water District
Riverside Transit Agency
CATV Franchise
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
45.
Business Park Drive shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located
28 feet from centerline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 39 foot half-
width dedicated right-d-way in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 111,156/78).
In the event that full half street improvements plus a lane are not constructed
for Business Park Drive prior to issuance of Certification of Occupancy by the
developer of Parcel Map No. 19580, the applicant shall construct those
required improvements. Adjacent to the project and to the intersection of
Single Oak Drive.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estinmtad (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 6
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per requirements of the Traffic Engineer.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shali be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633
Council Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 25633, which action is brought within the time period provided
for in California Government Code Section 66~99.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460,
Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved
tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date
unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60.
The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision
Map Act, Subdivision Ordinance ~60.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All
offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility
access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
Legal access as required by Ordinance q60 shall be provided from the parcel
map boundary to a City maintained road.
ST A F F R PT\T PM25633
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building
Code shall be submitted to the City Department of Building and Safety.
10.
11.
12.
13.
15,
16.
17.
18.
19.
The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated May 2L~, 1990, a
copy of which is attached·
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated April 29, 1990,
a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood
control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land
Division Ordinance ~60, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage
facilities shall be collected by the City prior to recordation of the final map or
waiver of parcel map.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated September ~, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Land Use Sectionis transmittal dated May 1, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Grading 5ection's transmittal dated May 16, 1990, a
copy of which is attached.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern
Municipal Water District transmittal dated August 2~, 1989, a copy of which
is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
Southern California Edison Company transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy
of which is attached.
Subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County
Gsologist~s Report dated July 3, 1989.
Prior to recordat. ion of this map, a reciprocal access agreement shall be
recorded for Parcels 2 and 3.
Prior to recordat. ion of this map, a signing and striping plan along with a
street improvement plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
STAFF R PT\TPM25633
2
20.
Prior to occupancy, developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements
and public facilities imposect upon the property or project, including that for
traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the E]R/Necjative
Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of
the fee, if an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not
been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building
permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been
provided to developer, Developer understands that said Agreement may
require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming
benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its
right to protest such increase.
GRADING:
21.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits. the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should
Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation
Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation
Plan as implemented by City Ordinanc~ or resolution.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
22.
No building permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any residentia~
lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer, or the developer's
successors-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility
financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars I$100) per lot/unit
shall be deposited with the City of Temecula Building and Safety as mitigation
for public library development.
23.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Planning Department.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the M-SC zone.
25.
All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum area of 10,000
square feet.
26.
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a
net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility
easement.
27.
All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of
Ordinance q60.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 3
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
28.
Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the followin9 condition i s) shall be
complied with:
A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet IECS) shall be
transmitted to the Plannin9 Department for review and approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS:
29.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final
map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with the City· Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the
EC5 shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to
the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The
following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the
Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure sodium lamps
that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the
horizontal plane passing through the luminare."
Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject
property as of the date of recordation of the final map.
The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor.
No building permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any
building in Parcel Map No. 25633 until the developer or the developer~s
successors-in-interest or assignees, provides evidence of compliance
with the terms of said agreement for the financing of public facilities.
"This property is affected by earthquake faulting and ground fissures.
Structures for human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault and
Ground Fissure Hazard Area."
ge
"County Geologic Report No. 601 was prepared for this property on
September 2, 1988 by Schaefer Dixon Associates, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern are
as follows: earthquake faulting, fissuring and ground subsidence,
seismic design of structures, liquefaction, and uncompacted trench
backfi II."
STAFFR PT\TPM25633 ~
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
recJardin9 the true meanin9 of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements. traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
30.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act.
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL:
31.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCF, R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CCF, R's shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CCF, R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CCF, R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CCF, R's shall be prepared at the developePs sole cost and expense.
The CCF, R~s shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
Ce
The CCF, R~s and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CCE, R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
e$
The CCF, R~s shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CCE, RIs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CCF, R's, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and
perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CCSR's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
ST A F F R PT\T PM25633 5
g. In addition to the above, the CC&R's shalI include the following:
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements
ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of air roads.
drives or parking areas shall be provided by CCF, R's or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the
issuance of building permit where no map is involved.
32. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
33.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. ~60.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained'
by a property owners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Engineering
Department.
35.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit, if required, shall be installed to CATV
Standards at time of street improvements.
36. Dedication shall be made of the following right-d-way on the following
streets:
DEDICATE Business Park Drive TO 39 FEET FROM STREET CENTERLINE
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
37.
Business Park Drive shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter Io,.~ted
28 feet from canterline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 39 foot half-
width dedicated right-d-way in accordanca with Riverside County Standard
No. 111, 156178 ).
In the event that full half street impPovements plus a lane are not constructed
for Business Park Drive prior to issuanca of Certification of Occupancy by the
developer of Parcel Map No, 19580, the applicant shall construct those
required improvements adjacent to the project and to the intersection of Single
Oak Drive.
ST A FF R PT\TPM25633 6
39.
42.
43.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thered, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to
the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
City Engineer.
The subdivider shall construct or post security guaranteeing the construction
of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City
standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights:
signing, striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate·
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping I street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
The subdivider shall provide bonds and agreement clearances from all
applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of the map.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordat. ion of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum established per lot as mitigation for a
traffic signal impact.
Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring
said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
No grading shall take place prior to the recording of the final map.
ST A F F R PT\T PM25633 7
50.
51.
52.
53.
51~.
55.
56.
57.
58.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soiIs stability and geolocjical
conditions of the site.
It is understood that the Tentative Map correctly shows all existing
easements, traveled ways and drainage courses, and that their omission may
require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be and
an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans.
The project Ior portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone,
therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a
Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer.
A minimum centerline grade shall be 0.50 percent.
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed
per requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the
area within the lO0-year floodplain.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
ST A F F R PT\T PM25633 8
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
/4065 COL~NTY CIRCLE DR. R,'vERSiD[. CA. 92503 <Um..,.g
BIVEB2.!E:E CC!U~'ZY PLANHING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside. CA 92502
RE: Paracel Map 25633: Being a subdzvzslon c,f F'arc=i
oF F'arce! Mao 195~0 as sho~n in BooL 154 of F'arc~l
Faaes ~2-96, records o~' P~vers~de County, California.
:~ lc, ts)
The EleF~rtment c,f Puh. i:c Health has reviewed E'~rcel Mar,
No. Z'SL".~'~. and recommer~ds that:
A water system 5ha/i be lnstal led accord~n~
plans and 5meczf;cat~on as aDproved by the water
c,rmDanv and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the Diana of the water system shall
be submitted ~n tr:ollcate. w~th a minxmum scale
nc, t less th.~'n one inch e~uals 200 feet. a]onr~ ~z~th
the orl~lnal draw~n~ to the County Surveyor.
'Fhe Drlnts shall ~how the internal bIDe d~ametE~r,
locatlon of valve~ and fire hydrants; PzDe and
.~c,~nt specifications. and the s~ze c,f the ma~n
at the qunctlon of the new ~vstem to the
e::tstlnL~ system. The plans sh,~ll cc,m[,lv in ,~l 1
resmect~ wl th Dzv. 5 . F'art I . Chapter 7 of the
Callfornla Health and Safety Code. California
A,'tmlnlstratlve Code. TItle 22. Chapter 16. al-irt
Order No. 103 of the Public Utlllt:es Commission, ol tt,~
State of California. when aPPlicable. The Dla:',s ~hall
be s~oned by a reol~tered enolneer and water cC, mDaF~V
with the followin~ certlflcatlon: "I certify that
desion of the water system ~n Parcel MaD 2K633 :s
accordance w~th the water svstem expansion Plans ot tl~e
Rancho Californlal Water District and that the water
service. storaoe and d~stribut~on system will be
adequate to Provide water service to such Parcel.
This certification doe5 not con-=tltute a clvlarantc. e
tinat it will supply water to such parcel map at any
specific quantities . flows or Dressurea for fire
protection or any other purpose". This certlt'icatlorl
5hall be ~ioned by a responsible official of t~le x~,3'c..r
company. T~e..p lar~s .mu. st_.De__s_uPm_i.t. ted to the. County
Surve.y0_r.'_s_.._O.ff_lce to..re_v_lew.._at.. leas.t_ two .weeks prior
to the req:.~est for the rec0r_datlon of the final map.
This s,xh, dlvision has a statement from Rancho I.'alifornia
Water District aoreeino to ~erve domestic water to each
and evofv lot lit the suL, dlvl~l,D], ora demand D| c, vldlzsq
satisfactory financial arran,~ements are completed with
subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arr~r, oements
to be made prior to the reccrdatlon of the final maD.
This subdivision is ~.;lthin the Eastern Municipal Water
District and shall be connected to the sewers of the
District. The sewer system shall be installed accordinq to
plans and specifications is amproved by the Dl~tr~ct. tlae
County Surveyor and the Health Department. Fermsx~ezat Drlrat~
of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in
triplicate. alonq ~ith the orlQlnal drawlno. to the Cc,,_~ntv
Survevo|'. The Drlnt~ shall show the lnterna] D1D~
diameter. location of manholes. complete profiles. DIDO
and .noint smecificatlons and the size of th= sewers at
the ]tlnctloB of the ne~z system to the exist]z'~o ~vs~ ~rn.
A sillale plat indlcatino location oI sewer llne~
water lines shall be a portion of the sewaoe m]an~
profiles. The plans shall be sicned by a realstored
enoineer and the sewer district with the followlno
certification: "I ce~'tlfY that the desxqn of th~ ~r.~z
system in Parcel Map 25633 is In accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water
District and that the waste disposal system is adequate
this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed
parcel maD."
Riverside Cruntv P!anr:In~ Pent .
Pace l,'iF:e
All'},': i c', i f A ,'! '~ m '.
M a V 2 4 . i 9 '_' '.'
The_plans_must be submitted to ~he County__Survevor
O_ff~_ce to review a.t least _two weeks ~r~or_._to .the
r~_qUf st __ f_O_F__~ h~_. r ~q q .r.d ~ ~_! ~.n _ q(__%b ~ ._~i !~,a.l._..~a_p_ ..
· 5
It v;~ll be necessary for financial aFranOements to be
completely f!nallzed Drlor to recordatlon of the final
maD.
:5::~cerelv.
~nv~rc. nmen~X He~h
SM:dr
co: C~tv of Temecula
KENNE'T'~ L EDWARDS
*995 ,wIA~'KE" STqEE-
FAX NO 7~4 788-)gEE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team ~2~~ Re:
P1 anner,~F~c
A r e a: //~4'/'t-/~d//',6,~
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the//~/~~5/-}~~[C?/,//..~z c~ab/~f~e Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the appli r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
,/
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of /Z:P~/?~¢p'~ The project will be
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~ave been constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
cc:
V, ry ~truly you ,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN J. NEXVMAN
FIRE CHIEF
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
46-209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405
INDIO, CA 92201
(619) 34Z-8886
Sept. 4, 1990
TO:
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTN:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE:
PARCEL MAP 25633 - AMENDED #2 - PLOT PLAN 116&9
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
3760 12TH STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
(7141 275-4777
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM
for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped
system (6"x4"x2}x2½), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than
165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved
vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from
any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow
requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer
and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify
that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements
prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department."
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater· The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement
that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be
included oa the title page of the building plans·
Subject: Parcel Map 25633 Page
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
8. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered
must appear on the title page of the building plans.
9. Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code,
Section 503.
10. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
11. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
12. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
13.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00
to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
14.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25¢ per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
15. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
ama
Administrative Office · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
May 1, 1990
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Jeff Adams
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside,.CA 92501
Parcel Map 25633, Amended Map No. 2
(Planned Industrial Development)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for
all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of
the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348.
Sincerely,
Vaughn Sarkisian
Land Use Technician
VS:sml
(714) 682-8840 · (-/q4) ~.5-18~ · Fax (714) 3694084
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
APN:
PLANNING / JEFF~
SAM D. GONZALEZ
May 16, 1990
','pm 25633 AMENDMENT # 2 EXHIBIT D
921-020-066
The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site.
The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends
approval of this project if the following conditions are included.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
-plicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from
· Building and Safety Department.
grading shall conform to the
Uniform Building Code and Ordinance
Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall
obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and
Safety Department.
Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' in vertical
height with grass or ground cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical
height are to be provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance
457, see form 284-47.
Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance security
to be posted with the Building and Safety department.
In instances where a grading plan involves import or export, prior to
obtaining a grading permit, the applicant shall have obtained approval
for the import/export location from the Building and Safety Department -
this may require a written clearance from the Planning Department.
All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate 100 year storm
flows. ' "
Observe slope setbacks per Section 2907, Figure 29-1, Section 7011 and
Figure 70-1 of the Uniform Building Code.
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information
form Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86,
and 284-46. These forms are available at all Building and Safety Offices.
Thank you.
nicipa[Water District
August 24, 1989
To:
Consulting Engineers and Developers
SUB,IECT: Supplemental Requirements to Land Division
Form SAN 53 - Water & Sewer (Supplemental SAJI 53)
This letter is written to assist all concerned parties with their processing
of a proposed land division (i.e. parcel, tract, etc.) to be developed. The
County of Riverside Department of Health-Environmental Health Services Division
(EHSD) in conjunction with Western Riverside County water and sewer agencies,
has developed the subject form to assist with the approval process for a land
division {development).
The process that Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD} uses involving the
subject form, is as follows:
The land division/development proponent (Proponent) contacts EMWD's
CuStomer Service Department to obtain a will serve letter. This is
considered a preliminary step in the approval process (i.e.
preliminary will serve letter) from EMWD's point of view.
The Proponent then normally contacts the EHSD as the next step in
the approval process, who in turn issues the Supplemental SAN 53
form to be responded to by the appropriate agency {EMWD, etc.).
The Proponent then forwards the Supplemental SAN 53 form (or a copy
thereof) pertinent to their project to the appropriate agency {EMWD,
etc.) for response.
EIq~D then provides appropriate responses to the questions checked
on the pertinent Supplemental SAN 53 form to the EHSD with copies
to the Proponent and any affected city. This may involve detailed
research of records and performance of various hydraulic calculations
including a network analysis of the system to serve the proposed
project in order to determine what facilities are necessary to provide
a proper level service for the proposed project. This response may
require 30 to 45 days depending on the level of effort required to
provide responses and is considered as the intermediate will serve
letter by EIq~D. Assistance in providing answers to these questions
by the Proponent's engineering consultant is welcomed by EMWD.
Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · 5~nJacinto, California 92383-1300 · Telephone (714) 925-7676 · Fax (714) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. SanJacinto Street, SanJacinto . Customer Sen ice/Engineering Annex: 440 E. C)aldand Avenue, Hernet, ~
Consulting Engineers
and Developers
-2-
August 2~, 1989
After the Proponent receives final approval from the appropriate
County of Riverside agencies for their project, they normally contact
EMWD's Customer Service Department to make financial arrangements
for construction of the facilities required to serve their project.
This agreement is considered the final will serve letter.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact me at (714}
766-1880.
Very Truly Yours,
Director of Planning & Research
HAS/dfw
WESTERN F~EGION
Southern Ca//Forn/a ,~d/son Company
P O. BOX 410
LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90807
100 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802
Riverside County
Road Department
P.O. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
Attention: Subdivision Section
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633
April 11, 1990
Please be advised that the division of the property shown on
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25633 will not unreasonably interfere
with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by
Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said
tentative parcel map.
This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the
Company's rights, title and interest in and to said easement(s),
nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the
provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of costs for
reiDration of any affected facilities.
In the event that the development requires reiDration of facil-
ities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right
of easement or otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested
to bear the cost of such reiDration and provide Edison with
suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights
are required p~ior to the performance of the reiDration.
If additional information is required in connection with
the above mentioned subject, please call Dennis Bazant at
(213) 491-2644.
Sincerely,
386(12)WPC/]c
cc:
Continental Lawyers Title Company
J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
::IiVE::I>iDE COU EV
-PLAnnirl( DEPA::IEITiE [
Ju~y 3, 1~89
Schaefer Dixon Associates
22 Nauchly
Irvtne, CA 92718
Attention:
Mr. Nicholas Selmeczy
Nr. Paul Davts
Mr. Dean M. White
SUBJECT:
Seismic/Geologic Hazard
ProJect 80-182
APN: 921-020-037
Parcel Nap 19580
Building & Safety Log e232505
County Geologic Report No. 601
Rancho California Area
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed your report entttled "Geotechnlcal Investigation, A Portion of
Business Park III, Phase 2, Parcels 1, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Rancho California
CA," dated September 2, 1988, and your response to County review, dated June
12, 1989.
Your report determined that:
The surface trace of a ground ftssure extends northwest-southeast
across the eastern part of Parcel 11, to the Parcel 10 property line.
The trace can be followed tn the shallow subsurface from the west side
of Parcel 8 across Parcels 9 and 10, The fissure location ts shown on
Plate 1, Geotechntcal Nap of you report.
Z. A zone Of previously unmapped faults ts assoc4ated with the above
h
mentioned ground fissures. T ese pre-exlsttng faults offset strata
that are between approximately 3000 and 9100 years old, These faults
are consldered act ve Holocene faults based on State of Caltfornqa
crl tar1 a.
3. There ts e potential for future movements to conttnue along the active,
Holocene faults, It ts not expected that future displacement rill
occur away from the pre-extsting, Holocene faults,
4080 LEMON STREET. 9" FLOOR
RI~RSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 7874181
46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
Schaefer Dixon Associates
- 2 - July 3, 1989
4. The W~ittier-Elsinore (Waldomar) fault is capable of generating very
strong ground shaking at the subject site. Seismic data from events on
f
this ault are as follows;
Maximum Credible Earthquake
Magnitude - 7.1
Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration - 0.70g
100-Year Probable Earthquake
Magnitude - G.O to 6.5
Peak HOrizontal Ground Acceleration - 0.35g to 0.41g
Liquefaction of soils at the site ts expected to be minimal. There is
little or no potential for lateral spreading or ground lurching at the
site. Potentially liquor, able soils 20 feet below proposed finish
grades are not anticipated to produce sand boils that could reach the
ground surface.
Your report recommended that:
No habitable structures shall be placed across the ground-surface
fissures and active faults or in areas with potential for ground
ftssuring or faulting.
2. A Restricted Use Zone shall be established as shown on Plate 2,
Recommended Restricted Use Zone.
Proposed structures should be designed to accommodate settlements which
may be induced by sot1 liquefaction, These settlements are expected to
be less than 1/3 inch over a distance of 20 feet and wtll be in
addition to settlements induced by foundation and surcharge loads.
An additional, det4tled subsurface investigation and geotechntcal
oun atton design of
engineering analysis shill be required for the f d
each proposed building when building and grading plans become
available.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a coonpotent manner and
satisfies the additional tnformltton requested under the California
Environmntal Qualit Act review Ind the Riverside County Comprehensive General
Plan. Ftnal approv~ is hereby given
of the report .
We recomnd that the followlng conditions be satisfied before recordation of
iny sulxltvtslon mps and/or issuance If any County permits associated with this
pro~ect:
Schaefer Dixon Associates
- 3- July 3, 1989
1. The Recommended Restricted Use Zone shown on the Recon~nended Restricted
Use Zone Map, Plate 2 dated September 2, 1988 in the report shall be
delineated on the project maps and/or Environmental Constraints Sheet
(E.C.S.). The areas within the Recommended Restricted Use Zone shall
be labeled 'FAULT AND GROUND FISSURE HAZARD AREA."
;. The following notes shall be placed on the E.C.S. and/or subdivision
maps:
(a) "This property is affected by earthquake faulting and ground
fissures. Structures for human occupancy shall not be allowed in
the Fault and Ground Fissure Hazard Area."
(b) "County Geologic Report No. 601 was prepared for this property on
September ;, 1988 by Schaefer Dixon Associates, and is on file at
the Riverside County Planning Departant. Specific tten~ of
concern are as follows: earthquake faulting, fissurtng and
ground subsidence, seismic design of structurest liquefaction,
and uncompacted trench backfill."
3. The E.C.S. and/or project maps shall be submitted to the Planning
Department Engineering Geologist for review and approval.
4. The exploratory trench backfill shall be addressed by the project
geotechntcal engineer prior to issuance of grading permits.
The recommendations made in your report for mitigation of seismic/geologic
hazards shall be adhered to in the design and construction of this project.
· Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNI DEPARTM T
~ eter - Pl. nt ng Dt r .tot
$AK:al
Bedford Properties o Seeyen Stlle
Cl31~ - Earl Hmrt
Building I Safety (2) - Norm Lostbom
Building & Safety - Tony Ramsaeoo~
Parcel Map 19580 - Central Files
~1 VFR f l PE
,I./DIST.
:50.00)
.30 ._90
132
:39
///t,F,~
O. 5'
NO
OAk'
~IM. ~0
lllmS?lO.O0
WA
47' 0 ~
ENV/
e
//~
-, i/I
/'~"' !/.
I:~/!:%~
/,f ' i /'
', i'/,
..... ;_z_..
/:. 'T /
,:. /':t ,
/
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
2. Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Wescon Properties
18102 Sky Park South
Irvine, CA 9271~
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Agency Requiring
Assessment:
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Location of Proposal:
8-23-90
CITY OF TEMECULA
Tentative Parcel Map 25633 and
Plot Plan No. 11669
Southwest side of Business Park Dirve,
north of Rancho California Road
Environmental impacts
I Explanations of all "yes" and '~maybe" answers are provided on attached
sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Ce
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
X
X
ST A FF R PT \T PM25633 1
Yes Maybe No
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslid·s,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
CO
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or 9round waters?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 2
Yes Maybe No
Plant
a.
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Life· Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants ) ?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
I birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitst?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 3
Yes Maybe N._9.o
10,
11,
12,
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare· Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
ae
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset· Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation ) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing· Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
ae
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ST A F F R PT\ T PM25633 ~
Yes Maybe No
15.
16.
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
Substantial impact upon existin9
transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
ee
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services· Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services:
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT~TPM25633 5.
Yes Maybe
17.
18.
19.
20.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health· Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health ) ?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources.
ae
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Ce
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ST A F F R PT\ T PM25633 6
Yes Maybe No
21.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term. environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited. but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 7
Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
Earth
1. 3.
No. Although the proposed project will result in cut and fill
slopes there will not be changes in the base geologic
substructures. The slopes shall be manufactured and compacted
per the engineer's requirements and as a result, should not
result in unstable earth conditions.
Yes. All development disrupts the soil profile to some degree
and results in soil displacement, compaction and over-covering.
Further analysis will determine if additional mitigations are
required.
No. Development of the proposed project will not require
substantial grading and as a result will not alter the existing
topography.
No. There are no unique geologic or physical features on the
site·
Yes. Wind and water erosion potentials will increase during the.
construction phase and remain high until disturbed areas are
replanted. The wind erosion impact is considered high and
significant but will be mitigated through minimal grading,
retention of natural vegetation whenever feasible, and use of
watering trucks and hydro-seeding disturbed areas after
grading·
No. There is no body of water near the project site which could
be affected by the proposed project.
Yes. The project site is located within a liquefaction and fault
hazard zone area according to the Riverside County General Plan
Geologic Hazard Map. A geologic report for the project should
address these potential issues.
Air
2.
b-c,
Maybe. Depending upon the amount of traffic generated by the
project, an increase in carbon monoxide and particulate emissions
will occur. This impact is not considered significant since the air
emissions from this project is only an incremental impact to the
area~s air quality.
No. The proposed project should not create any objectionable
odors or alter the area's climate.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 8
Water
3. a,d-e.
b-c,g.
4. a-d.
No. The proposed project will not affect any body of water. The
closest body of water to the site is Murrieta Creek which is
approximately one-half mile away,
No. The proposed project will increase the amount of
impermeable surfaces on the site which will reduce the amount of
water absorption. However. the introduction of irrigation to the
site will be off-set the water absorption rate. Drainage patterns
will continue to flow to the streets and channels.
No. The proposed project will not interfere with the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters.
No. The proposed project will not affect the public water supply
o system.
Yes. The proposed project is within the Murrieta
Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan and watershed area.
To help mitigate the project's impact, a flood mitigation charge
shall be paid.
No. Although the development of the site will remove any of the
plant species that currently exist on the site, no unique, rare or
endangered species should be affected. New species of plants
will be introduced to the site as par of the landscape
requirements for the project. The addition of the new species is
not considered a negative impact. It is not clear by the plot plan
if the existing Eucalyptus trees on the site will remain. Due to
their maturity, as many should be retained as possible.
The site is not currently used for agricultural purposes.
Animal Life
5. a-c.
No. The proposed project is in an area that has been
experiencing urbanization for a number of years. It is
anticipated that the only animal life on or in the vicinity of the
site includes squirrels, rabbits, lizards, and other animals
common to the area. It is highly unlikely that an endangered
specie habitates the site.
Noise
6.
ae
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during
construction. Long-term noise impacts will occur due to
increased traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be
significant since the surrounding land uses are not noise
sensitive.
No. Severe noise will not be generated by the proposed project.
STAFF R PT\T PM25633 9
Liqht and Glare
7.
Maybe. The proposed project is located within the Mr. Palomar
Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area which recommends the
use of low pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lights to help avoid
interference with the Mr. Palomar telescope known as "Skyglow".
The use of LPSV lights will reduce the light and glare produced
by the proposed project.
Land Use
8.
No. The Southwest Area Plan designates the subject site for
General Light Industrial. The surrounding land uses are also
office and light manufacturing.
Natural Resources
9. a-b.
No. The proposed use will not increase the consumption rate of
any natural or non-renewable natural resource.
Risk of Upset
10. a.
Maybe. If the manufacturing tenant uses any hazardous
materials in their operation, a list of hazardous substances and
disposal plan shall be submitted to the City.
No. During construction, it should not be necessary to close any
streets which would interfere with emergency vehicles. If street
or land closure is necessary, it shall be coordinated with the City
and Police Department.
Population
11.
No. The proposed office/industrial building will generate some
jobs but not a significant amount to alter the area's population.
Housincl
12.
No. The proposed office/industrial building will not generate a
significant number of jobs to create a demand for additional
housing.
ST A F F R PT\T PM25633 10'
T ran sportati on / C i rculation
13. a,c.
Maybe. The proposed project will generate additional traffic to
and from the site. However. it is not anticipated that this
increase will be significant. The traffic that is generated by the
project may add an incremental impact to the Rancho California
Road/I-15 Interchange which is currently operating at capacity
during peak hours. This potential impact may be mitigated by a
transportation improvement mitigation fee.
Yes. The proposed project will require parking to support the
use. The project will need 392 parking spaces· The proposed
plan illustrates spaces.
Maybe. The proposed project will improve a portion of Business
Park Drive which will ultimately loop around and connect to
Rancho California Road. Completion of Business Park Drive will
divert some traffic from the northern intersection of Business
Park Drive and Rancho California Road·
No. The proposed project will not affect waterborne, rail or air
traffic.
Yes. Any increase in traffic will increase the potential hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians.
Public Services
14. a,b,e.
c,d,f.
Yes. The proposed industrial/office use will require public
services in the areas of police, fire, maintenance of roads, and
public facilities. This impact is not considered significant. The
incremental impact should be evaluated and the appropriate fees
assessed. Property taxes should mitigate the impact and
continuing need for services over the long term.
No. The project should not have a substantial affect on these
public services.
Enerqy
15. a-b.
No. The proposed project will not result in the substantial use
or increase in demand of fuel or energy.
Utilities
16. a-f.
No. The proposed project requires the use of utilities but will
not require substantial alteration to the exiting systems.
STAFFR PT\TPM25633 11
Human Health
17 a-b.
Maybe. If hazardous substances are stored in the warehouse,
then that may create a potential health hazard. If hazardous
materials will be warehoused at the site, a plan for their use and
disposal should be submitted to the City.
Aesthetics
18.
No. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vista open
to the public. The elevations of the proposed project are
consistent in architectural materials as the surrounding
buildings.
R ecreation
19.
No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses.
Cultural Resources
20. a-d.
No. The subject site has previously been mass graded and it is
unlikely that the project will result in the destruction of a
prehistoric or historic archaeological site. If a site is
discovered, an archaeologist or paleontologist should be called on
site to supervise the digging and determine if the site is
significant. The proposed project will not impact any building of
historic significance, affect unique ethnic cultural values or
restrict sacred uses.
Mandatory Findinqs of Siclnificance
21. a-c.
No. The proposed project will not significantly affect the natural
environment, have long term environmental impacts or have
considerable cumulative impacts.
Maybe. If the proposed use warehouses hazardous materials, the
project may cause a health hazard to human beings and wildlife.
If hazardous materials are to be warehoused at the project, a
plan for their use and disposal should be developed and approved
by the City. The project may also have a substantial impact on
the existing transportation system. To mitigate the potential
impact at the Rancho California Road/1-15 Interchange, a traffic
mitigation fee should be paid.
STAFF R PT\TPM25633 12
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARAT)ON will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
req u i red.
fr .f o
Date
For CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 13
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 25633
TO SUBDIVIDE A 7.2 ACRE PARCEL INTO ~. PARCELS AT
THE SOUTHWESTERLY SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE.
WHEREAS, Wescon Properties filed Parcel Map No. 25633 in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on
September 17, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
approval of said Parcel Map;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findincls.
makes the following findings:
That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
{1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
{2 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
~a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 1
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
{c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan. as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County. including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP and
meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
( 2 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving pro)ects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
There is reasonable probability that Parcel
Map No. 26533 proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 6.5, no Parcel Map may be approved
unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be
detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and
further, that any Parcel Map approved shall be subject to such
conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map
proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
STA F F R PT\TPM25633 2
community.
SECTION 2. Environmenta~ Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Parcel
Map No. 25633 for the subdivision of a 7.2 acre parcel into ~ parcels located at the
southwesterly side of Business Park Drive subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1990.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the
Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 3
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for Parcel Map No. 25633.
DATED: By
Name
Title
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 ~
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 11669 TO
PERMIT OPERATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITY AT
BUSINESS PARK DRIVE.
WHEREAS, Wescon Properties filed Plot Plan No. 11669 in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances.
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on
September 17, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing. the Commission
recommended approval of said Plot Plan;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to
said Plot Plan on . at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission
proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
the following findings:
Findinqs.
That the Temecula City Council hereby makes
A. Pursuant to Government Cede Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
12 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
~a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
ST A F F R PT\T PM25633 1
studied within a reasonable time.
~b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~C)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, l hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proccccling in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and
meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
{2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 11669 proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
( 1 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan
requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law
and City ordinances.
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 2
(2) The overall development of the land is designed for
the protection of the public health, safety and general weifare;
conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible
with the present and future logical development of the
surrounding property.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
is compatible with the present and future development of the
surroundin9 property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
project will
Declaration,
An initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the city of Temecula City Council hereby approves Plot Plan No.
11669 for the operation and construction of an industrial park located at the
southwest side of Business Park Drive subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION tl. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
· 1990.
RON PARKS
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
COUNC I LMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCI LMEMBERS
DAVID F. DIXON
CITY CLERK
STAFFRPT\TPM25633 3 *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No. 11669.
DATED: By
Name
Title
STAFFRPT\TPM2Se33 q
ITEM NO.
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 9, 1990
Revised Permit Tentative Tract Map No. 19872, Amended
No. 2, Phase 3 and 4
PREPARED BY:
Richard Ayala
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Silverwood Development, Inc.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
PROPOSAL:
Revise architectural floor plans, elevations, and
plotting of housing.
LOCAT ION:
Southerly of Pala Road, westerly of Via Gilberto
EXISTING ZONING:
R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: R-2
South: R -2
East: R-2
West: R -2
~Multiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
STAFFR PT\TM19872 1
BACKGROUND:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Revised Permit application for Tentative Tract Map
No. 19872, Amended No. 2, Phase 3 and ~ was
submitted to the City on July 30, 1990. On
September 17, 1990, it went before the City of
Temecula Planning Commission and was approved
based on the analysis and findings contained in the
staff report.
Planning Department Staff recommends that the City
Council:
RECEIVE AND FILE Tentative Tract Map No. 19872,
Amended No. 2, Phase 3 and 4 based on the analysis
and findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
STAFFRPT\TM19872 2
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 17, 1990
Prepared By: Rich Ayala
Case No.:
Tentative Tract Map No. 19872,
Amended hie. 2, Phase 3 and ~,
A Revised Permit
Recommendation: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLI CANT:
Silverwood Development, Inc.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Robert Be(n, William Frost & Associates
PROPOSAL:
Revise architectural floor plans, elevations, and
plotting of housing.
LOCATION:
Southerly of Pala Road, westerly of Via Gilberto
EXISTING ZONING:
R-2 IMultiple Family Dwellings)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: R-2
South: R-2
East: R -2
West: R-2
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
IMultiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
(Multiple Family Dwellings)
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Overall Project:
Total Acreage:
Total Lots Proposed:
Proposed Density:
Proposed Minimum
Lot Size:
SWAP Allowed Density:
90.01 acres
443
4.5 DU/AC
~, 160 sq. ft.
2-5 DU/AC
ST A F F R PT\ TM 19872 1
Phase 3:
Total Acreage:
Total Lots Proposed:
No. of Lots Revised:
Minimum Lot Size:
Phase 4:
Total Acreage:
Total Lots Proposed:
No. of Lots Revised:
Minimum Lot Size:
10.43 acres
4,690 sq. ft.
14.36 acres
61
61
4,376 sq.ft.
ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amended No. 2, was
originally approved by the Riverside County Board
of Supervisors on April 9, 1985. In approving the
project ( TM 19872 ), the County also approved
Change of Zone No. 4290 which was a request to.
change the property's zonin9 from R-1 ( One-Family
Dwelling) to R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings); and,
Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment
No. 19105.
Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amended No. 2 is a
proposal to develop 90.01 acres with 443 single
family residences. The subject property is located
southwesterly of Pala Road, between Loma Linda
Road and Via Gilberto.
This tentative tract has been designed in
accordance with the development standards of the
R-2 zone. The R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings) zone
sets forth strict development standards which are
formulated to encourage "excellence in design and
( in ) the provision of housing opportunities through
an integration of site planning subdivision design
and housing development."
There has also been three prior requests for
revised architectural floor plans, elevations, and
plotting of housing (March 1990, November 1989,
June 1989) which two of the three were approved by
the Riverside County Planning Department through
a substantial conformance. The other request
I November, 1989) was withdrawn from
consideration.
STAFF R PT\TM19872 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Due to a change in ownership and market/design
considerations, the applicant is proposing to revise
the architectural floor plans, elevations, and
plotting of housing for Phase No. 3 and L~ of
Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amended No. 2.
The applicant is proposing four different floor
plans, one consisting of a single story three
bedroom, two bath residence with approximately
1,L~62 square feet of living space. The other three
floor plans are two story and range from three
bedrooms, three baths to four bedrooms plus bonus
room and three baths. All floor plans consist of a
two-car garage. Livable square footage range from
1,D,62 to 2,367 square feet. The previous design
proposed single family residences ranging from 91u,
to 18L15 square feet.
The applicant is proposing a variety of elevations
consisting of a Spanish theme. All elevations
proposed consist of either red or grayish mission
tile roof with an array of off-white and cream stucco
exterior finish. Previous architectural treatment-
consisted of wood timber, wood shingle, and
stonework fronts with wood shingle roofing.
Plotting of housing is also proposed by the
applicant, due to the reconfiguration of the floor
plans in order to meet setback requirements.
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
The proposed project with a density of 4.5 DU/AC
is consistent with the Goals contained in SWAP.
Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amended No. 2 has been
previously approved, and the site is most
appropriately utilized in a residential capacity.
Due to the level of consistency that this project
maintains with SWAP Goals and Policies, and based
on previous determinations made for Tentative T tact
No. 19872, Amended No. 2 by the County of
Riverside, Staff finds that revised permit for
Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amended No. 2 is likely
to be consistent with the City's future General Plan
when it is adopted by the City of Temecula.
STAFFRPT\TM19872 3
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
In compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, the County prepared an ~nitial Study
for this project during the original review of
Tentative Tract Map No. 19875, Amended No. 2. It
was determined at that time by the County that
possible negative impacts to the environment couid
occur as a result of project implementation.
However, adherence to conditions of approvaI,
policies, development standards would mitigate
those concerns. As such, a Negative Declaration
was recommended and adopted by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors on April 9, 1985.
After reviewing the applicant's proposal, Staff has
determined that the previous environmental
determination J Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment No. 19105) still applies to
this request since this application is for the revision
of buildin9 design and plotting only. Therefore, an
additional initial study was not prepared nor is an
environmental determination recommended to the
Planning Commission,
The proposed use of action complies with
State planning and zoning laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configurations, circulation
patterns, access, and density.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare nor affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Initial
Study for this project.
Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amended No. 2,
is compatible with surrounding land uses.
The harmony in scale, bulk, height, density,
and coverage creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area·
STA FFR PT\TM19872
The design of each subdivision is consistent
with the State Map Act in regard to future
passive energy control opportunities. Units
have significant southern exposure which
allows for passive heating opportunities.
Deciduous landscaping can be utilized to aliow
solar penetration in winter and shading in
Summer.
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Planning Department Staff recommends that the'
Planning Commission:
APPROVE Tentative Tract Map No. 19872, Amended
No. 2, Phase 3 and 4 based on the analysis and
findings contained in the Staff Report and subject
to the attached Conditions of Approval.
RA:ks
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Exhibits
STAFF R PT\TM19872 5
RiVE=I iDE COLIRE,,:,
PLA~~iil0 DEP, REliIEllE
DATE: ,'lay Z~, 1'2c5
/
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
E. A. NLMBER: 1.o105
REGIONAL TEAM NO. Twn
Supervisors has taken the following action cn the above
Dear Applicant:
The RiverSide County Board of
referenced tentative tract map at its regular meeting of
April .n, 1985
__ APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions.
al 1 pertinent el ements of the
__ DENIED tentative ~p based on attached findings.
APPROVED withdrawal of tentative map.
found to be creststent with
The tract map has been
Riverside County General Plan and ts in c~npltance with the California Environmental
Guality A~t of 1970. ne pruj~ct will not have a significant effect on the environment
and a Negative DeclaraJion has )~ee]l* adopted.
'~' ~' "*~' ' t
,he Board of Supervisor Heartn§,__t~eh~Z-d(te-~f-~vh~r-~$L,~ll:nm~'-L~bl~, unless within that
period of time a finN ~m~n~q. sh))) .~(" . ~en approved and.f~e: tth the County Recorder.
Prior to the expiration d&~e~e,I)"~,)vfd~l.~l~'a~pl] |m~'(~tr.l~g for an extens on of
time. Application sha)l'~ b~!jf~Fdi~').0~the Planntn0 .E)~tli:_(i~,oH~t~ft~ (30) days prior to the
expiratim date of the tent ~ia)a~:~,' l~')B0')'r~V~l~U'L~l)~t~)~;/m).'y extend the period for
one y~ar and upon further ap atta~ a se ~m~ and a t)~t~ ,~:ar. ' ~[____~~rVery truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUN?Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT
R~er S. Streeter, Planning Director
CJC:gn. '
FILE- WHITE
·
Cynthia J. Crotringer. ,,/
Deputy lann.t~q Director
P .
APPLICANT- CANARY
ENGINEER - PINK
215-)) (Icy. i011))
4080 LEMON STREET. 9'" FLOOR
;qlVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
48-209 OASIS S'
INDIO,'
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SUBMFilAL DATE:
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE N0. 4290 and TRACT N0. 19872, ANENDED N0.2 - "',~,"'
Collins Land Company - First Supervisorial District - Rancho
California Area - 90.01 Acres - 443 Lots - Schedule A - R-1 to R-2
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
'FROM: planning Department
The Planning Com:ission and Staff reconTnend:
ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration.for Environmental Assessment
No. 191D5, based on the findings .incorporated in the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not
have 8 significant effect on the envtrorment; and,
APPROVAL of Change of Zone Case No, 4290 from R-1 to R-2 in
accordance with Exhibit 2; and,
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amd. No. 2. subject to
· . the attached amended conditions. and based upon the following:
(Continued on next page)
_ a;gm .... : '... '. Rogle~ St er, Planning' Director
:
I'~,,nf.~ ('rimremit
rIIql.
AGENO,
· [PACT NO, 19872, Amd, 12
Page 2
Form llA
FINDINGS:
1. The subdivider proposes to divide 90.01 acres into 443 single-family
lots. .
2. The subdivider proposes to change the zone of the subject parcel from
R-1 to R-2 and to develop the property in conformance with the R-2
Restricted Single Family Zone.
General Plan
3, General Plan policies call for Category I and II land uses,.
4, Two specific plans hav~ been approved both north and east of the subject
propert, y.
5,' The Pala Road corridor is general planned for urban development.
Tract Oesi;n
The subdivider proposes to build two product. lines of single family
houses. -.
7, The street design consists of curvtltnear'strbets, short cul-de-sacs
and long, bltnd cul-de-sacs.
8, The R-2 Restricted ~tngle Family Zone sets no.m~ntmum lot size requirement.
g. Lots in the tract range from 4,160 square feet to 24j260 square feet th
size.
10. Twenty-two percent of.the lots have rear yard areas which are less than
1600 square feet In stze~ the R-2 suggested minimum is 1000 square feet.
11. The larger lots ~r~ located adjacent to the ~reek and at the end of the
cul-de-sac. ·
House Design
12. The subdivider proposes six floorplans for the 'first product line and
four floor plans for the second.
13. Each floorplan is provided with three different elevatt.0ns.~ '
14, Spanish Oaks offers houses which range in size from 1 ,d80 to 1,845 square
feet. The architecture features timbered, shingled and stonework front
trea~ents and conventional garages.
TRACT NO. 19872, Amd. ~2
Page 3
Form 11A
Spanish Oaks II offers houses which range in size from 914 to 1,432
square feet. The architecture features stuccoed and sparsely timbered
front treatments and tandem garages.
16, Product ltnes are clustered into similar neighborhoo8 groups.
17,' House .plotting avoids repetition,
Environmental Concerns
8.
Environmental concerns include erosion, noise, Palmr Observatory,
school impactlon, and biological and historical resource impaction.
Oak trees line the banks of Pechanga C~eek.
The sarcophagus of Louis Wolf, an important Temecula settler, iS located
onstte and is shown on proposed lot 349.
21, The Sam Hicks Memorial Foundation is interested in relocattng the tomb-
stone to a more appropriate Site,
22, The proposed 443 lot subdivision points out the need for park facilities
in Rancho California..
CONCLUSIONS .
General Plan .
1. The proposed R-2 subdivision is cons4stent with the growth patterns and
develop.ment densities suggested by the General Man.
The proposed R-2 subdivision is compatible with both existing and proposed
adjacent residential developments,
The proposed R-2 subdivision meets the requirements of the R-2 Restricted
Single Family Zone. ·
Tract Oest(in
4, The proposed R-2 subdivision meets the intent of the zone and the develop-
cent standards.
The roadway destgn, although not Optimally functional tn that it inhibits
pedestrian movements, provides an interesting subdivision layout and helps
to create a varied streetscape.
6,..In the tabulation of overall tract open space provisions, the larger lot
rear yards compensate for the small yards of the smaller 1ors.
7. The various floorplans and elevations would offer an assorb~ent of home-
buyinn onnnrttmities.
TP~.CT NO. 19872, Amd. 12
Page 4
Form 11A
Enviroru~ental Concerns
The Louis Wolf grave should be moved to either a parkstie or a cenetary,
or any such location which would preserve this historical resource.
Oak trees shall not be removed; and development shall be res{ricted
along Pechanga Creek.
10. Consideration should be given to' the dedication of a parksite within
the.subdivision. ·
11. All 'other environmental' concerns can be mitigated.through the conditions
of approval.
'j
Jh :
EXCERPTS FRC~I THE FEBRUARY 20, 1985 PLAN~'IIN~ CD~'.IIISSIO:t HINUTES
(REEL 842 - SIDE 1 - 535-1151)
CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 4290 - EA lg105 - Collins Land Conpany - Rancho California
Area - First Supervisorial District - 00.01~ acres, southwesterly of Pale Rd,
westerly of Via Gilberto - REQUEST: R-1 to R-2, etc.
TP. ACT 19872 ~IENDED NO. 2 - EA 19105 - Collins tend Company - Ranthe
California Area - First Supervisorial District - southwesterly of Pale
westerly of Via Gilberto - 443 lots - 90.01~ acres - R-1 Zone. Schedule "A"
Subdivision
The hearing was opened at 10:20 a.m, and closed at 11:07 a.m.
STAFF RECOtiHENDATION: Adoption of the negative declaration for EA 19105,
approval of Change of Zone Case 4290 from R-1 to R-2 in accordance with Exhib-
it 2, and approval of Tract 19872 Amended No. 2 subject to the proposed condi-
tions. Staff felt the proposal met the letter and the intent of the R-2
ordinance, would be compatible mth area development (both existing and
approved land uses); and consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan.
The project would impact sensitive historical and biological resources, as it
contained the 9rave site of Louis Wolf who was a prominent Temecula merchant
and citizen in the late laDO's. After a thorough investigation, staff felt
the best protection would be to have the grave site relocated, and Condition
53 had been imposed to require that this be done prior to the recordation of
the final map. There wore also oak trees and other sensitive vegetation grow-
ing along the creek bed, hut staff felt the conditions provided for ample pro-
tection of these biological resources.
Commissioner Beadling expressed concerns about flooding problems, and partic.u-
larly the effect of having a portion of so~e of the lots in the creek bed.
Hr. Greywood briefly discussed this .issue and the proposed mitigation which he
felt would be adequate; he advised that riprap would he required where neces-
sary along the banks, and that the creek bed was in the rear of larger lots.
Because of the size of these large lots, Mr, Greywood did not think this would
be a problem,
Don Lohr, representing the applicant, advised they did not object to moving
the grave but would like to have the County's help in finding a site for its
relocation, Included in Condition 53 was a statmnont referring to mainte-
nance, and the developer did not think he should have this responsibility in
perpetuity; he would be willing to establish sme type of funding which could
be turned over to the agency which would accept the responsibility for the
grave site. The condition required that the grave site be relocated prior to
the recordation of the final map. They planned to unitize the project, and
the grave site was located in an area covered by a later phase; he requested
that the condition be amended to clarify that the relocation of the grave site
would be required prior to the recordation of the phase covering the area
where it was currently located.
9
EXCERPTS FRC~ THE FEBRUARY 20, 1985 PLANNING COMi~IISSION HINUTES
In anst~er to a question by Con~nissioner Beadling, Hr. Lohr explained the flood-
ing problem in this area and how it affected the subject property. He advised
only one tier of lots on the easterly side of one cul-de-sac was affected.
Commissioner Beadling also expressed concern about the slopes and !lr. Lohr
advised that area contained dense oak trees, and they had therefore designed
exceptionally large lots to maintain'the area in its natural state as much as
possible. The bank protection they were providing for the subject property
would also be provided for the adjacent property as required by the conditions
for an approved tentative tract nap; the flooding protection for these two
projects would be coordinated.
Gabriel Pico, Chairman of the Pechan a Indian Reservation, Post Office Box
1014, Temecula, and his two sisters IMrs. Marie Russell and tlrs. Germaine Are-
nas) advised they were grandchildren of Louis ~lf and requested that the
grave site not be relocated. They advised they would be willing to maintain
the grave site if left in its present location. firs. Russell advised her moth-
er was the granddaughter of Louis Wolf but could not attend the meeting that
day .because of illness. Her mother was strongly opposed to relocating the
grave site.
Mr. Lohr advised they had agreed to relocate because staff had indicated they
felt this would be the best way to protect it. However, the ovmer of the prop-
arty would be nora than ~illing to leave the grave'site at its present loca-
tion.
)~rtin Collins, 40825 Sierra I~ria, Rancho California, the property ~./ner,
advised he would be willing to fence the lot and donate it to the family.
firs. ~ussell advised she was also on the Council of the Zndian Reservation,
and ~as very concerned about the impact of this develoiN~ent. They used their
adjacent land for agricultural purposes, and Wanted to be sure the developer
understood they did not plan any type of improvements in order to provide
flooding protection. She stressed there were existing serious flooding prob-
lems on the subject site. Hr. Gre~od briefly reviewed the Flood Control
conditions, which he thought would provide adequate protection for both the
subject site and the adjacent Indian lands.
Hrs. Russell also expressed concern about the tmpact of septic systems on
their domestic wells.' She was informed water and sewer service would he fur-
nished by the water district, and therefore her wells would not he affected.
Commissioner Steffey asked about the bridge, and Mr. Johnson read into the
record Condition 28 of the new Road Department letter dated February 20, 1085
which set forth the responsibilities of the subject developer with regard to
this brid0e. He advised this condition would be imposed on every tract or
parcel mp considered for this area. Commissioner Steffey thou0l~t the bridge
was critical, as the existing bridge was narrow, had a h~Oh crown, and was.
10
EXCERPTS FR~I THE FEBRUARY 20, 1985 PLA:~tlNS CO.~IIISS]0~ III~CJTES
very dangerous. Commissioner Sullivan con~mented he felt that without the
bridge improvement, the project would be premature. Mr. Johnson advised the
State of California was considering making the existing bridge an historical
monument, which would create difficulties. The Road Department v~as therefore
considering a new road alignment, with a new bridge, and llr. Johnson briefly
discussed this alternative. Commissioner Bresson asked wi~ether the new Road
Department conditions would take care of the problem. rlr. Johnson thought
they would, and advised he anticinated a County Initiated minor change for the
tract map to stipulate the dollar amount per lot which would be required; this
change would be processed after the 'total amount necessary for the bridge has
been determi ned.
Ms. Rines suggested that Condition 53 be deleted and replaced with a condition
to read: 'Concurrent with the racerdeSign of the final map, Lot No. 349 will
be deeded to the Louis Wolf family, as represented by Gabriel Pace or any oth-
er authorized family member. The subdivider or any subsequent property ovmer
shall. erect a fence around Lot 349 as directed by the family representative.
The Wolf family shall be responsible for maintenance of the site.
Cormmisstoner Purviance suggested that the wording be changed to read "as
agreed upon by the family representative" rather than "as directed".
Mrs. Russell suggested that the condition refer to her mother rather than
Gabriel Pico. Her mother's name was Eyelyn C. Pace, Post Office Box 972,
lemecula. Mrs. Arenas asked about an easement to provide access to the site,
and w~s informed access would be provided by an adjacent cul-de-sac street.
Hr. Lohr agreed to the conditions as ~cnded, including the ne.~ Road Ocp~rt-
merit conall tigris.
There was no further testimony, and the hearing was closed at 11:07 a.m.
FIfIDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The subdivider proposes to divide 90.01 acres into
443 single family lots, jnd proposes to change the zone from R-t to R-2 and
develop the property tn conformante with the R-2 Restricted Single Family
Zone; General Plan policies call for Category I and IX land uses; two specific
lens have been approved both north and east of the su Ject property; the Pale
~oad corridor is general planned for urban devel b
opment; the stabdivider propos-
es to build two product lines of single family houses; the street design
consists of curviltnear streets, short cul-de-sac streets, and long, blind
cul-de-sac streets; the R-2 Restricted Single Famtly Zone sets no minimum lot
size requirement; lots in the tract range from 4160 square feet to 24,260
square feet in size; twenty-two percent of the lots have rear yard areas which
are less than 1600 square feet in size and the R-2 suggested minimu~ is 1000
square feet; larger lots are located ad~Jacent to the creek and at the end of
cul-de-sac streets; the suhdivider proposes six floor plans for the first prod-
uct line and four floor plans for the second; each floor plan is provided mth
three different elevations; Spanish Oaks offers houses t~hich range in size
11
EXCERPTS FRCll THE FEBRUARY 20, 1985 PLANIIING CO,~,IIISS]ON tIINUTES
from 1080 to 1845 square feet; the architecture features timbered, shingled
and stonework front treatments and conventional garages; Spanish Oaks II
offers houses which range in size from 914 to 1432 square feet; the architec-
ture features stuccoed and sparsely timbered front treabnents and tandem garag-
es; product lines are clustered into similar neighborhood groups; house
plotting avoids repetition; environmental concerns include )resign, noise,
Palemar Observatory, school impaction, and biological end historic resource
impaction; oak trees line the banks of Pechanga Creek; and the sarcophagus of
Louis Wolf, an important Temecula settler, is located on site and is shown on
proposed Lot 349, and the Sam Hicks'Memorial Foundation is interested in tale-
casing the tombstone to a more appropriate site. The proposed R-2 subdivision
is consistent with the growth patterns and development densities suggested by
the General Plan; compatible with both existing and proposed adjacent develop-
ments; meets the requirements of the R-2 Restricted Single Family Zone; meets
the intent of the R-2 zone and development standards; the roadway design,
although not optimelly functional in that it inhibits pedestrian movements,
provides an interesting subdivision layout and helps to create a varied
streetscape; in the tabulation of overall tract open space provisions, the
larger lot rear yards compensate for the small yards of the smaller lots; the
various floor plans and elevations would offer an assortment of homebuying
opportunities; protection of the Louis Wol.f grave is provided through the'con-
.. diSions of approval; oak trees shall not be removed and development along
Pechanga Creek shall be restricted; and all environmental concerns can be miti-
gated through the conditions of approval for the tentative map. The proposed
project would not have a significant effect on the environment.
KOTXOI|: Upon motion by C~nmtsstoner Bresson, seconded by Comissioner Steffey
and unr. ntmously carried, the Commission reconvnended to the Board of Supervi-
sors adoption of the negative declaration for EA 19105, approval of Change of
Zone Case No. 4290 from R-1 to R-2 in accordance t~th Exhibit 2, and approval
of Tract No. lgB72 Amended No. 2 subject to the proposed conditions, amended
as follows. based on the above findings and conclusions and the recomenda-
tions of staff.
Amend Condition 6 to meflect the Road Department letter dated
February 20. ~985
Delete Condition 53 as currently~r~tten and replace with the following: d
Concurrent with the recordatlon of the final map, Lot No, 349 w~11 be dee ed
to the Louis Wolf family, as represented by Evelyn C. Pace, Post Office Box
972, Temecula, or any authorized family member. The subdivider or any subse-
quent property owner shall erect a fence around t nt 349 as agreed .po,~ by
the family representative and the subdivider. The Wolf family shall be
responsible for maintenance of the site,
t2
EXCERPTS FR~"1 TM[~ FEBRUARY 20, 1985 PLAN~IItlG COt~',ISSION I~It]UTES
ROLL CA~L VOTE RESULTED AS FOLLO~dS:
AYES: Camissioners Bresson, Steffey, Beadling, Sullivan, 14acGregor and
Purv~ance
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
e .;
~3
~ancho California Zoning District
First Supervisorial District
E.A. Number 19105
Regional Team No. 1I
1ENTATIVE TP, ACT N0. 19872 &
CHANGE OF ZONE N0.42'90
Planning ConTnisslon: 2/20/85
Agenda Item No. ll & lla
1. App]icant:
2. Engineer:
3. Type of Request:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Location:
Extsttng Roads:
Collins Land Company
$haller and Lohr
Restricted single family residential
Change of Zone from R-1 to R-2
subdivision;
Extsttng Land Use:
Surrounding Land Use:
Extsttng Zoning:
Surrounding Zontng:
Site Characteristics:
General Plan Elements:
(Comprehensive)
Southerly of PEla Road, westerly of Via Gtlberto
Pala Ro~d
12. Land Dtvtston Bata:
Vacant
Vacant, St~gle family residential, agricultural
R-l, R-R, A-1-10
Low grass-covered undulattng hills
LAND USE: CategoryIX
DENSITY: 2 - 8 du/ac
OPEN SPACE/CONS: Not designated
CIRCULATION: Artertal - 110' (Pala Road)
TOTAL .ACREAGE:..90,01 .r
TOT~TS,~:; 443 .~
D,U,' PER.ACRE: 4,S "'
· ~PROPOSED'MINIMLI4 LOT SIZE:
4.160/Schedule A
School DIstrict: '
a. Impacted: Yes
b, School Agreements have been recetvjd:
Yes
14. Agency RecmmmndaUons:
FLOOD:
HEALTH:
FIRE:
See letter dated 2-5-85
See letters dated 1-18-85 & 8-20-84
See letter ~mted 1-15-85
TENIATIVE TRACT NO. 19872
CHANSE OF ZONE NO. 4290
Staff 'Report
Page -2-
ANALYSIS:
Project Description:
Change of Zone No. 4290 and Tentative Tract No. 19872, Amd. No. 2 is an application
to develop 90.01 acres in Rancho California with 443 single family residences.
The applicant proposes to change the zone from R-1 (Single Family Residences) to R-2
(Restricted Single Family Residential Subdivision). The subject property is located
southwesterly of Pale Road, between Loma Ltnda Road and Via Gilberto.
This tentative tract has been designed in accordance with the development standards
of the recently modified R-2 zone· The R-2 Restricted Single Family Zone sets forth
Strict development standards which are formulated to encourage "excellence in design
and (in) the provision of housing opportunities through an integration of site planni
subdivision design and housing development.'
The applicant has proposed two separate product.lines for this subdivision. Staff h8
reviewed both product lines with regard to the strictly defined R-2 development
standards and has determined that the subdivision conforms to the intent and purpose
and standards of the R-2 ordinance. The following analysis provides a point by p~int
review of the tract, itsrelationship to the environment, and its consistency with
both the General Plan and the requirements of the R-2 ordinance.
Envtromental Concerns:
Enviro~ental Assessment No. 19105 indicates that the following environmental concert
affect the subject property: liquefaction potential, erosion hazards, roadway noise
(Polo Road), Polomar Observatory operations, and sensitive historical and biological
resources. The assessment also indicates that the project will impact school facil-
ities and will require the widening of Pala Bridge in order to accomodate increased
automobile traffic. Furthermore, the applicant has proposed a 443 lot subdivision,
and no provision is made for park facilities.
Most significantly, the pr~Jectwtll impact sensitive historical and biological
resources. At present, the sarcophagus of Louis W~lf, a premtnent Temecula merchant
and citizen in the late 1400's, is located onstte. Three of his children are also
thought to be buried beneath the tombstone, which is shown on Lot 349 of the tentati
map. At the time the applicant submitted the map, no plans Md Men made for proSac
tton or relocatton of this historically significant gravesite· Planning Staff has
contacted Stephen Becket of the Riverside County Parks Department and Bill Harker of
the Temecula Chamber of Cmmerce regarding preservation of this resource. The Parks
Department suggested that the tomb barelocated to a site accesible to the public, o
which would permit maintenance and preservation of the tombstone and remains contain
therein. The Department indicated, however, that its functions and duties would not
permit the Department to accept responsibility for such relocatton and preservation.
Mr. Backer mentioned that a local Tmecula historical organization might willingly
accept maintenance responsibilities.
IENFATIVE TRACT NO. 19872 &
CHANGE OF ZONE N0. 4290
Staff Report
Page -3-
At the time this Staff Report was written, the Sam Hicks Monument Foundation express
an intense interest in placing tf~e sarcophagus in Temecula near the Sam Hicks Mon~me
Or in the Temecula cemetery. Although no formal decision has been reached, the
resource could be located thusly, and all relocation and archaeological expenses
be borne by the developer. Condition No. S3 in the conditions of approval. for Tenta
Tract No. 19872 outline the measures to.be undertaken for historical resource preser,
tton. Gravesite relocation may not appear to be the most desirable sblution, howeve,
Planning Staff and Parks Staff believe that such relocation to a parksite or cametar:
w~uld prevent vandalism or defacement of the tomb. Such activity might occur if the
graveSite were located within a residential neighborhood.
As indicated above, the subject site also has biological resources which must be
preserved. Pechanga Creek forms the southwestern boundary, and coast live oaks grov
along and beyond its banks. Also, the site lies within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat
habitat range. A biological survey was performed on the site. and the resultant repc
indicated that no state or faderally listed plant or animal species are present. The
report concluded that, apart from the oaks, biological impacts of the project are
expected to be minimal. The conditions of approval ensure oak preservation and pro-
tection of the Pechanga Creek banks.
Staff is concerned that the proposed subdivision makes no provision for conm~untty par
facilities. Although each lot is provided with backyard private open space, the neec
sorely exists in Rancho California for neighborhood and cem~unity park sites. The
nearest schoolyard or parksite is located approximately three and one half road miles
from the proposed subdivision.
With the exception of Specific Plan Development, asidenatal development at urban
densities has been occurtng in Rancho California without consideration to cormunity
parkland acquisition. Staff is concerned that the proposed 443 units will place a
burden on Rancho Caltfornia's limited park facilities ......
Staff did not condition for a park site (one maintained by a homeowners association)
because it would not be a c~muntty park, but one only for the residents within the
subdivision. Consideration should be given, however, to identifying future sites for
cmmuuntty park developme.ha within the Rancho California area.
The conditions of approval should also mitigate erosion, noise. school, Observatory a
traffic concerns. The Road I)eparment will require the developer to participate in
the reconstruction of Pale Bridge at Tmmecula Creek.
General Plan Consistency:
The subject property lies within the Rancho Californta/Temecula subarea of the Southwe
Territory Planning Area. Although some surrounding properties are presently in
agricultural use, the General Plan Indicates that the Pala Road corridor should
experience urban rowth. Two specific plans have been approved for the Pale Road cor-
ridor: Specific PVan Mo. I ,
117 (Pale Vtl ages) which lies Just northwest of the subject
property. and Specific Plan No. 171 (Wolf Valley). which covers approximately 1370
acres across Pale Road General Plan policies call for Category I and II land uses,
provided that the requisite level of public services is available.
TENTATIVE TP, ACT NO. 19872 &
Change of Zone No. 4290
Staff 'Report
Page -4-
The Eastern Municipal Water District has indicated that it can and will provide sewe~
service to the subdivision. Water service will be provided by the Rancho California
Water District once the subject property is annexed into the District. The map will
not be able to record until such service is made available.
The proposed 443 single family unit subdivision conforms to the growth patterns and
rates allowed by the General Plan. The project will'incrementally increase the decant
npt only for sewer and water services, but also for other urban services such as fire
and sheriff protection, solid waste disposal and library services. Developer's fees
and future residents' taxes should.relieve any burdens placed on County services.
Project Design Considerations:
As indicated above, the applicant has developed two product lines which incorporate
the R-2 Restricted Single Family development standards into both the tract and housin~
designs. The project will first be reviewed with respect to overall tract design,
and then each product line will be analyzed separately, and the strengths and weaknes.
in design will be discussed. It should be noted that the project meets the letter of
the ordinance and achieves the intent of the R-2 Restricted Single Family Zone.
A. Overall Tract Design
1. Road Design
The Road design makes extensive use ofcurvtltnear streets and short cul-de-sacs,
as encouraged by the R-2 ordinance. The unique design does have disadvantages in
that it hinders through pedestrian and vehicular movements, but the curviltnear
street pattern is designed to discourage such through vehicular traffic. The
curving streets and short cul-de-sacs serve to slow traffic and to force drivers
exit the tract. he
to use larger roadways.to T design also creates an interesting
and varied streetscape, and it forms numerous neighborhood units.
The particular design does include four dog-leg cul-de-sacs, but topographical
and sight distance constraints prevent these roadways from becoming through stree
2. Lot Location and Arringenent :
The lot wtdths are fairly uniform throughout the tract, with the exception of tho
lots on cul-de-sacl and knuckles. The tract does tnclude several cul-de-sacs wit
mstde-on' end lots (for example, see Street 'G'), which causes side yards, rather
than beck yards, to be oriented toward the roadway. This arrangement creates
versatility in design.
Lot Size and Configuration:
The tntent of the R-2 ordinance ts to encourage a variety of lot sizes and lot
configurations within a given subdivision through the relaxation of Such develop-
ment standards as minimum lot size and untfom lot shape. In the R-2 zone, lot
sizes and shapes are guided by development standards for minimum and tract avera~
design features. Such features include building setbacks, usable rear yard areas
rear oriented side yard areas, and project wide open space.
TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 19872 &
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 4299
Staff Report
Page -5-
The subject tract meets the minimum average standards for projectwide design
features'and thereby creates an appealing assortment of lot sizes and configu,a:
The 443 residential lots range in size from 4160 square feet (30.2 percent lot
coverage) to 24,260 square feet (5.g percent lot coverage).
The smaller lots are situated along main streets and on He level .terrain. Large
lots include those which are located at the end Of cul-de-sacs and those which be
up to Pechanga Creek. The R-2 standards call for a tractwide average of 2000 squ
feet of usable rear yard area, and the subject subdivision has a tractwide avera~
of 2360 square feet. No lots have less than.the minimum of 1000 square feet of
usable rear yard area. The R-2 guidelines do suggest that the number of lots wit
backyards smaller than 1600 square feet in size be kept at a mtntmm. Calculatic
reveal that 101 lots, 22.3 percent of .the tract, have usable rear yards smaller
than 1600 square feet; however, in most instances, these lots also have backyard
slopes, a feature which creates an i11uston of increased hackyard size.
The varied lot sizes should offer a wtde selection of housing types, designed
meet the needs of a variety of prospective homeowners.
B. House Design
The two product'lines tncluded tn the subdiviSIon are spread throughout the tract
each individual 'neighborhood" is comprised of a single product line. The two
products are known as Spanish Oaks and Spanish Oaks IX.
1. Spanish Oaks
The Spantsh Oaks homes include 277 stngle family residences whtch range in size
from 1080 square feet (2 bedrooms, 2 hathrooms) to 1845 square feet (3 bedrooms,
one library, 2~i hathrooms). Each dwelltng unit ts equipped with a conventional
2-car garage. Spantsh Oaks offers stx slgntftcantl different floorplans,
different elevations are provided par floor p~an. Both single-story and
three and
two-story homes are proposed. The architectural treal~ent consists of wood timbe
wood shtngle and stonework fronts and stucco sides, and the roofing material is
made of wood shingles. The house st 1as are architecturally harmonious and offer
e varied streetscape: The dtfferent,.-mdels have been plotted so as to avoid rape
tton.
Overall, the Spanish Oaks ltne offers a vartety of housing types which are
functional and should appeal to a'vartetyof housing tastes.
2.' ,Spanish Oaks l!
The Spantsh Oaks X! heaes are somewhat smaller than those of Spantsh Oaks, and th;
architecture less elaborate, All of the homes have stuccoed front exteriors with
Some timber treatment.
This product line offers a tandem garage arrangement which departs from the conve-
tiOnal side-by-side set-up. The tandem garage gives rise to a rectangular floorp'
whiEhmaxtmtzes utilization of a smaller lot.
IENTATJVE TRACT NO. 19872 &
C~ArIGE.OF ZOr~E NO. 4290
Page -6-
House sizes in Spanish Oaks 1I range in size from 914 square feet (2 bedrooms,
2 bathrooms} to 1432 square feet {3 bedrooms, 2~ bathrooms}. Two single-story
and two two-story plans are proposed. All units offer a dining room and a kitchen
nook.
The rectangular s~pe of the lots and houses forces the entryday on one (1) of the
units (Plan 987) to be obscured and oriented away from the'street. This arrange~en
is not optimally suitable for safety reasons, and all such entryways should be well
lighted.
All front trea)ent~ are designed ivtth varying relief features. In some instances,
however, the garage and window trea~ents offer the major alterations in elevations
Use of various house colors should relieve any potential monotony in the streetscap
Overall,'Spantsh Oaks %1 provides a good contrast and complement tO Spanish Oaks.
SUH/4ARY:
The proposed R-2 Restricted Single Family subdivision meets the requirements of Ordtnar
348 and 460 and meets the intent of the R-2 development standards. Design weaknesses
include minor pedestrian movement problems, a problem inherent in curvilinear street
patterns, and only minor variations in Spanish. Oaks 11 elevations. The applicant has
"used the ordinance to create an interesting and innovative tract which would offer a
variety of housing types to a variety'of home buyers.
Envtror~ental concerns can be mitigated through the conditions of approval and through
Careful trea~ent of historical and biological resources. Staff expresses concern ove,
the lack of park space in Rancho California and feels that a parksite may be appropria,
for this subdivision and all subsequent small lot single and multiple family developmet
FINDINGS:
The su~tvtder proposes to divide 90.01 acres tnto 443 stngle family lots.
The subdivider propose~ to change the zone of the subject parcel from R-1 to R-2
and to develop the preporty in conformance with the R-2 Restricted Single Family
Zone.
General Plan
3. General Plan poltcld ull for Category ! and IX land uses.
4. Two spectflc plans have been approved both north and east of the subject property.
5. The Pala Road corridor ts general planned for urban development.
Tract Design
6. The subdivider proposes to build two product lines of single family houses;
7. The street design consists of curvtltnear streets, short cul-de-sacs and long,
bi Ind cul -de-sacs.
'fEN'T~,TIVE TRACT NO. 19872 &
CHANGE OF ZONE N0. 4290
Page -7-
8. The R-2 Restricted Single Family Zone sets no minimum lot size requirement.
9. Lots in the tract range from 4160 square feet to 24,260 square feet in size.
10. Twenty-two percent of the lots have rear yard areas which are less than 1600 squ~
feet in size; the R-2 suggested minim~ is 1000 square feet.
11. The larger lots are located adjaceat to the creek and at the end of cul-de-sacs.
Mouse Desiqn
12. The subdivider proposes six
plans for the second.
floorplans.for the first product line and four floc
13. Each floorplan is provided with three different elevations.
14. Spanish Oaks offers houses which range in size from 1080 to 1845 square feet.
architecture features timbered, shingled and stonework front treatments and
conventional garages.
15. Spanish Oaks I! offers houses which range in size from 914 to 1432 square feet.
architecture features stuccoed and sparsely timbered front treatments and tandem
garages.
16. Product lines are clustered into similar neighborhood groups.
Th
17. House plotting avoids repetition.
Envtromnental Concerns
18. Envtro~nental concerns include erosion, noise, PalmMr. Observatory, school impact
and biological and historical resource Impaction.
19. Oak trees line the banks of Pechinga Creek.
20. The sarcophagus of L~uts Wolf, an important Tmecula settler, is located onsite a
is shown on proposed lot 34g, :
21. The Sam Htcks Memorial Foundation ts interested in relocating the tombstone to a
more appropriate site.
22. The Prol~sed 443 lot lubdtvtston Imtnt$ out the need for park facilities in Ranch
Caltfornte.
CONCLUSIONS:
General Plan
The proposed R-2 subdivision ts consistent with the growth patterns and develop~e
densities suggested by the General Plan.
TENTA'rIVE TRACT NO, 19872 &
CHANGE OF ZONE NO, 4290
Page 4-
2. The proposed R-2 subdivision is compatible with both existing and proposed adjac~-
residential developments.
3. The proposed' R-2 subdivision meets the requirements of the R-2 Restricted Single
Family Zone.
Tract Oest;n o
4. The proposed R-2 subdivision meets the intent of the zone and the development
standards.
5. The roadway design, although not opttmally functional in that it inhibits pedestri
movements, provides an interesting subdivision layout and helps to create a varied
streetscape.
In the tabulation of overall tract open space provisions, the larger lot rear yard
compensate for the small yards of the smaller lots.
The various flo~rplans and elevations ~uld offer an assorl~ent of homebuying
oppor tun i tt as.
Enviromental Concerns
8. The Louis Wolf grave should be moved to either a parksite or e cenetery, or any
such location which would preserve this historical resource.
9. Oak trees shall not be removed, and develo~ent s~ll be restricted along Pechanga
Creek.
10. Consideration should be given to the dedication of a parksite within the subdtvtsi
11. All other envtromental concerns can be mitigated through the conditions of approv
RECOI~IENDAT/016:
ADOPTION of a Negative Decl*aratton for Enviromental Assessment No. 19105 based on the
conclusion that the propoied project wtll not have a significant effect on the
envtroment; and,
APPROVAL of Change of Zone ~. 42g0 frm R-1 to R-.E in accordance with Exhibit 2; and,
APPROVAL of Tentative Tract IIo. 19872, Mcl.#2, subject to conditions, based on the
findings and conclusions Incorporated tn thts staff report.
LR:GH
oz,-Z
· Z z~
- !
.{
I
~t/EIL~IDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPEKVISORS
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19872
A~D. NO. 2
· The tentative subdivision shall c~mply with the State of Californxa
. Subdivision Hap Act and to all the requirements "of the Riverside County
Ordimlnce 460, Schedule A , unless modified by the 'conditions. listed
boxer. This appcoved or conditionally approved tentative map viII expire two
years after the Board of S~pervlsors approval 'data, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
I. The timex nap shall be prepared by a registered civil euSineer subject
to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Hap Act
and. u4verside County Subdivision Ordinance A60.
The subdivider shell submit eel c~py of s soils report to the l~lverside
Cotsty Surveyor's Office and tvo copies to the Department of BuildinS and
, Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and SeoloCical
conditions of the site.
3, Xf on7 are'dinS is proposed, the rubdivider shall rubric one print of
comprehensive SrsdtuS plan to the tlvsrside County Department of BuildinS
·and Safety. The plea shall romplye'v lib the ~niform BuildinS Code,
Chapter 70, as usadeal by Ordinance 457 or unless othervise stipulated by
the County's Killside Development Standards, ·
'&. A 2redinS' permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
ltfety prior to cousincement of may Iradin2 outside of co~u~e- maintained
.. ~d ~t of wy, If' ~ad~ is pco~md on slopes o ~: Sr--tec,
' n ~lz~uut uusmUt a,~al ~1. h u~imd fr~ Plannine
bpartmnt prior to sa aauptsms of the plans by the kildin2
IMpartmeat, One tfyla= copy of the approved BradinS plan shall ba
submitted 'to the Department of BuildinS and Safety for transsittal to the
'bad Departsant.'
5. All delinquent prepare/taxes sbell be paid prior to recordalien of the
final rasp. : '
:
~.6, The rubdivid, or shall' comply with the street improveneat recommendations
the Coon y bad Deparmsut*s letter dated r~-S-85 (a copy
o~tlimd in attached~, *~se~ded st P,C,
of v~ich is g-ZV-85
7. Lspl scnsss as ~equired. by Ordinance &60 shall be provided frm the
tract map boundary to s County usintsiusd ~osd,
8. All road casemats shall be offered for dedication to the public and
shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approvcd
by the County toad Cmusi'ssioner. Street Hues shall bQ subject tO
~!/ approval of the toad Comsissioncr.
/
Conditions of Approval
Page -2-
ge
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary.
All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded
as directed by the Riverside County Surveyor.
lOe
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter d~ted 1/18/85 and 8/20/84, (copies of'which are aortachad).
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control reconm~ndations outlined
by the Riverside County Flood Control Otstrtct's letter dated 01-03-85,
Ca copy of which is attached). If the land division lies within an adopted
flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County
Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area
drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road C~antsstoner.
12. The subdivider shall comply with the .fire improvement reconTnendations outlined
in the County Fire Marshell's letter dated 1/15/85 (a copy of which is attached).
in accordance with the written request of the landdivider to the County of
Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the agreement
between the landdivider and the Elsinore Union High School and Temecula Union
School Districts, no building permits shall be issued by the County of River-
stde for any parcels within the subject tract Np until the landdivider, or
the landdivtder's successors or assignees, provides evidence of compliance
with the terms of said agreement between the landdivider and the school districts
~tor to the filing of the final map, the applicant shall submit written
clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all perti-
nent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following
agencies have been met.
Fire Department
Flood Control
Health Department
Planning Department
~/~ Prto4 to the recordatton of the final map, Change of Zone No. 4290 shall be
5.~ approved by the hera of Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created
by this lend division shall be in conformance vith the development standards
of the zone ultimately. applied to the property.
6.
89
Lots created by this subdivision shall be tn conformance with the development
standards of theT~2/Itestrtcted SIngle-Family zone.
Construction of the development permitted hereby may be done progressively in
phases, provided adequate vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling
units in each phase and further provided that such development conforms sub-
stantially with the intent and purpose of the approved Tract Hap No. 19872. Amd.
No. 2. Should the developer choose to construct the development in phases.
a phasing plan must be submitted for P1anntn9 Department approval.
Corner lots shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3~88
of Ordinance 460.
TENTATIVE TPJkCT NO. 19872, Atnd. 12
Conditions of Approval
Page -3-
19.
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have
· ne~ usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the
utility easement.
20. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in ~his subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 461. ,
2 ·
Wall and/or fence locations shall conform to the fencing exhibit, on file at
the Planning Department with Tentative Tract No. 19872.
Landscaping plans shall Incorporate the use of specimen trees along streets
in conjunction with street tree planting·
y/24.
Where street trees cannot be planted within the right-of-way of interior
streets and project parkways, due to insufficient road right-of-way, they
shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way.
All existing specimen trees 'and significant rock outcroppings on the subject
property shall be shown on road improvement and grading plans and shall note
those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
25.
All extsttng specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved
wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved, they shall be relocated
or replaced with specimen.trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replace-
ment trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans.
26. Any oak trees removed with four (4) tnch or larger trunk diameters shall
be replaced on a ten (lO) to one (1) basis as approved by the Planning
Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans.
Prior to the tssmmn~ ef tmiildiag I)ermtts.ergrmdtng permits, whichever comes
first, the following tree preservation guidelines shall be incorporated on
approved grading, building end landscaping plans as necessary:
a)
Every effort shall lamede to prevent encroachment of structures,
-gradtrig or trenthing within the dripline or twenty-five (25) feet of
the trunk of any tree, whichever is grater.
b)
If encroaclmentwithtn the'drtpltne ts unavoidable, noNre than one
thtnl of t~e t~ot ere. shall be disturbed, graded or covered with
impervious mmtertals. The root area is considered to extend beyond
the dripline · distance equal to one half the radtus.
c)' Building, grading or improvements shall not occur within ten (10) feet
of any tree trunk.
d) Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve
natural grade to at least one-half the distance between the trunk
and the dripline. Walls shall be designed with a post or caisson
" footing rather than a continuous footing to minimize root damage.
TL~,,ATIVE TRACT NO. 19872. ,
Conditions of Approval
Page '-4 -
f/
e)
f)
Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest extent
possible.
Rudolf channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal
soil moisture characteristics on a seasonal basis.
g)
Runoff shall not be directed towards the'base of trees so that the
base of the trees remain in wet soil for an extende~ period.. Where
natural topography has been altered, drainage away from trunks shall
be provided where necessary to ensure that water will not stand at
the crown.
h) Sedimentatton and silt··ion in the drainage ways shall be controlled
where necessary to avoid filling.around.the base of the trees.
t)
Land uses that would cause excessive solid compactton within the drip-
line of trees shall be avoided. If the areas are planned for recreation,
provide trails to restrict compaction to · small area. Heavy use under
trees shall be avoided unless measure! to minimize compaction are under-
taken.
J) Landscaping or irrigation shall not be installed within ten (10) feet
of any tree. -
k) Careful consideration shall be given to the planning of structures near
trees to avoid unnecessary or excessive pruning.
Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Htilside Development Standards:
All cut and/or fill slopes, or IndIvidual combinations thereof, which exceed
tan feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination
Of · special terracing (benchtng) plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1),
retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All drive-
ways shall not exceed · fifteen percent grade.
~. Prior to the approval of gradin permits, an overall conceptual radtng plan
shall be submitted t6 the Planning Director for approval, The p~an shall
be used as · gutdelSne for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual
phases of development and shall include the following:
a) Techniques which wtll be uttltzed to prevent erosion and sedimen-
t··ton during Jnd after the grading process.
b) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of
January through March.
c) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
30. All manufactured slopes exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be
contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques:
· ) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain,
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19872. r, nd. 12
Condttions of Approval
Page -5-
2 ·
b) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
c) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii
designed in proportion to the total height of the slope where
drainage and stability pemtt such rounding.
d) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in' horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous
undulating fashion.
Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant rock
outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building pads on
final grading plans·
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and
shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other
erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of grading pemits, the developer shall provide .evidence
to the Director of Butldtng and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured
slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope. maintenance responstbtlttte
have been assigned as approved by the Director of Bulldtng end Safety,
34. An Environmental COnstraints Sheet (EC$) shall be prepared with the final map
to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed
with the office of the County Surveyor. Prior to the recordatton of the final
map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the
recorded final map to the Planntng Department and the Department of Build)ng
end Safety·
35. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: /
"County Biological Report No, 96 was prepared for this property and is on
file at the Riverside County Planntng Department, The specific item of
concern in the report is oak tree .preservation,"
36, The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet:
· No permits allowing any surface alteration shall be allowed in the deltnea e
constraint areas without further investigation and/or mitigation as dtrecte~ d
by the Riverside County Planning Department, This constraint affects lots//
parcels, as shown on the Environmental Constraints Sheet complles with the
final map and filed in the office of the Riverside County Surveyor."
vatory. Light and glare may adversely impact obs y ope · -
door 11ghttng shall be from low pressure sodium lamps that are oriented
and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal plane
passing through the 1uminatre."
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. lgB72, Amo. #2
Conditions of Approval
Page .6-
Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with
the standards of Ordinance 46l and the following:
//
a) CoHcurrentiy with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the
Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the Proposed
Street lighting layout from first the appropriate utility purveyor and
then the Road Department's traffic engineer.
b) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Department's
traffic engineer, the developer shall also file and application with
LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting district, or annexation
to an existing lighting district, unless the site is wtthtn an existing
lighting district.
c)
Prior to recordatton of the final map, the developer shall secure condi-
tional approval of the street ltghting application from LAFCO, unless
the site is within an existing lighting district.
9,
One center identification monument sign, in accordance with Ordinance 348,
shall be allowed for the housing area. Other signage shall be allowed in
conformance with Ordinance 348. No billboards shall be pemttted.
0t
Roof-mounted equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision. y'
All building permits and/or plans for all new structures shall incorporate
tile or other fire re,ardent roofing and siding materials, as approved by
the County Fir, Marshall.
~tor to tN issuance of building permits for.any phase of development, the
developer shell submit ftnal development plans to the Planning Department
for approval, pursuant to Section 7.11g of Ordinance 348.
43. Iq, for to the tssuance of grading ~lmee~tsF the subS,ca property
shall be successfully annexed to the Rancho California Municipal Water District
44. Building separation between the nearest structural portions of dwellings
shall be no less than 10 feet,
45. ky side yard area whtch has walkways, mechanical equipment or similar ~
obstructions, except fences, located ,rlthtn five feet of · side lot line
shall be provided with drainage pipes to de-water rear yards or such other
Beans as approved 6y the Department of Building and Safety.
,/
46. All driverays shall be concrete paved or equtvtlent as approved by the Planning
Department.
.'.~.47. Fencing shall be provided throughout the subdivision in accordance with the ~
, ~ approved plan of development.
Prior to the issuance of grading pemtts, the applicant shall submit e fencing
plmn for Planning Department approval.
~ond!:~ons of Approva~
Pa~e -7-
49.
Prior to rec~rdatt~n of any ftnal map, a ftnal plan of development shall be ~'
submitted for Planning DepartJnent approval, pursuant to Section 7.11g of
Ordinance 348.
The final plan of development shall contain the following elements:
a) The stte's ftnal grading plan.
b) A final site plan sho~tng the'lots, building footprints, a11'
setbacks, yard spaces and floor plan and elevation assignments
to fndivtdual lots.
c)
d)
Worktng drawings of the floor plans and elevations for the
dwellings to be constructed tn the subdivision. Elevations
shall be provided for all sides of all buildings.
A typical mechanical plan sho~tng the locatton and placement
of mechanical equipment for Individual dvelltngs.
The required final plan of development shill.be tn substantial conformance
~th the pro3ect's approved gradtng plan, stte plan, floor plans and eleva-
tions except as provtded for tn Sectton 7.11g(2).
'.. SO, Prtor to the tssuance of tmlldtng pemtts final cqearance shall be obtatned fro=
the Planning Department stipulating that the sul~ttted butldtng plans conform
to the approved plan of development for the property. ·
Prior to the tssuance of occupancy'permits, a decorative block wall or combin-~/
atton landscaped earthen berm and decorative block wall shall be constructed
along Pale Road and Via Gtlberto. All lots shall be provided with stde4~d
and rear yard fenctng, and satd fencing shall be shmm on the fencing plan.'
All block walls or combination earthen berm/decorattve block walTs*shaT1 also
be shown on the fencing plan. All fences shall be constructed prtor to the
S2.
Issuance of occupancy pemtts.
Thts subdtvtston mayber~corded 1n phases subject to the following:
1) Proposed phastn~, Including phase boundaries, sequenCIng and floor
plan selection, shall be subject to Planntng Dtrector's approval.
2) Each proposed phase shall comply krlth the provisions of Section 7.11
9fOrdtnance 348.
3~ if any phase of the subdivision v411 be developed wi~h fewer than the
Ipproved number of floor plans, the canalalive m(x of .floor plans
resulting from the sequential recordalton of phases shall comply with
the provisions of Section 7.11f(3) of Ordinance 348.
TENTATIVE TP. ACT NO. 19872,
Conditions of Approval
Page ,B-
A~o. 12
*53·
P~e"~e~a~y~pPe1~m~a~y~g~di~eP~e:e~da~n~f~the~f~n~1~map;~h~:he~er~:eM~
f~st;~he~s~w~graves~te~sh~}~be~e~e~ted~s~d~re~ted~b7~the~1~nn~ng~
~PeeteP=--A~-exh~at~eR~-Peheat~eM-aMd-aPehaee~eg~cat-expenSes-sha~-be-the--
respeRs~b~l~t~-ef-the-deve~eper:--The-retecat~en-sha~t-fottow-the-fo~ow~n~--
peeeedIR§s~oeP-etheP-PPeeeedi^§s-al-aPp~e~ej-~-the-Ptann~ng-B~pettep~
a~--;he-develepeP-shal~-ebta4R-a-eouPt-oPdeP,-aathoP4fed-ST-a-membe~-of-the-
~elfofamt~y-eP-aRy-otheP-Pes~eRI4b~e-paP~y~oto-remeve-and-Petecate-e~-pema~ns
I~-the-lembstose-~Jl-a-J4le-des4gRae. ed-bT-the-Pta^n4Rg-BepaPtmeRt.
~--A-qua;4fied-apekaee~e$$st-sha~l-be-en-a4te-duP4Rg-aRT-aRd-a~-exeavat~o.-
ee~(w4$4es-pe~ated-U-SPawes~te-pe~oeet~on,
s~--;he-pwope,-Pe1494ous-oP-otheP-ee.emeR4esv-as-d4Peeted-bT-~am4~7-membe~s-o~
aR~-Othew*wespoRs4bh-paplTv-sha~-be*pePh~eed*upeR*exhumat4e..
d~--AT~-exhvm~t&eR4td-peheaieeR-p,eeeed~Rgs-shaTT-be-eeerd+Rated-w4th-the-
R4ve~aeda-~ouRly-GepeRepLs~gff~ee-ksd-Geunt~-PaPks-gepaPtmeR~.
f~--JJpgu-~ol~e&t~eu-e~-~ke~&veseter4~em~neRt-pl~q~e-sha~-be-p~aeed-e~-the-
s&~e-o~-Sentms~he Tract ~. 1~72, ~. No. 2. The 3enguage on the p~aque
*blared at Plann4ng Cm4sston 2-2~85.
~t~tltthl[~ttOB. Ml, N:~-~Jll~--~hall be deeded to
.~Itffll~l~i.m represented by Mrs. Evelyn E. Ptco or any authorized
family men~er. ~e sbbd~vtder shall erect a fence around Lot No. 349 as agreed
upon by the famtly r~presentattve end the subdivider. The ~olf fam41y shall be
responsible for mtntenance of the stte. *Added at Planntng Com4sston 2-20-85.
LRR: J 1 e ;am ;eea
OFFICE OF ROAD COI~,ur$$1ONER & COUNTY $URVEY(~R
IC~COMac$$aON[I & COuNIv I,~lv[vO I
RIverside County Planning Co~m~tsston
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 9Z50I
February 20, 1985
Tract Rap 19872 - Amend
Schedule A - Team Z
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I/tth respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative
land division map, the Road Oepartment reco,.'mnends that the landdivider
provide the followring street inprove.-.~nts and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Rodd improve~;zent "'
Standards (Ordinance 461). |t is understood that the Tentative Hap
COrreCtly shorTS all existing easements, traveled ways, 4nd dratnaqe
courses with appropriate O's, and that their ox~is$ion ~ay r~quir,., the
map to be rosubf,~itted rot further consideration. These Ordinances and
the followin,] conditions are essential parts and d requirement uccuring
..in ONE is as bi,.Jing as though occurring in all. They are intended tu
be complementary and to describe the conditions for d complete duti.jn Of
the improy,in, n,. AII questions regarding thu true meaning of the
Conditions shall be referred to the Road Comissioner's Office.
Zl
The landdivider Shall protect dOwnStream prOpertieS frcxn
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e.,
concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
prey Ided by construct tng adequate dratnage fact 1 t ties
ncludtng enlarging existing facilities or by securing a
drainage easehen, or by both. All drainage easements
shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows:
· Drainage Easement'- no buildings, obstructions, or
encroachmerits by 3and fills are allowed'. The protection
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose .of all
offsite dralnag flowing onto or through the site. In the
'went the Road ~eemtsstoner permits the use of Ureets for
drainage purposes, the provisions of Arttcle Xl of Ordinance
Me. 460 wtll apply. Should the qumn'ITties 'exCeed the street
capacity or the use of streets M prohibited for drainage
purposes. the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
tract ~o 19872 - Amend f2
$ched.jle A -Tean 2
February 20,* 1985. ..
Cc 'aliens
14ajar drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
cA", 'D", 'H" and "J" Streets (between Via Gliberie,and 'A"
· Street) shall be improved within the dedicated right of wa:y in
accordance with County Standard ,o. tO4, Section A. (40'/60')
· 8", "C", 'E", 'G", "Z", 'J', (westerly of 'A' Street) 'K".
elm, "14', 'N", '0", 'P", 'Q'o 'R", mS' and eta Streets Shdll be
taproved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with
County Standard Ilo. 105, Section A. (36'/60').
6, Via Gilberto shall be improved with 28 feet of asphalt concrete
paveme, t within a 40 fOOt part width dedicated rimjht ulr way in
accordance with County Standard No. 110, $ectton A. (20'/30').
7. Concrete stde~.salks shall be constructed throuOhout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard Ha. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk).'
XOe
The minimum centerline gradtnet shall be 0.35Z.
Pala Road shall be improved with concrete (~urb and gutter located
43 feet frocq centerline and r. satCh up asphalt concrete pavtnq;
reCOnStruCtion or reSurfacing of existing paving as deCerr. mined
by the Road Co~tsstoner within I S5 foot half width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard NO. lO0.
Prior to the retardation of the final map, the developer shall
deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of
S150,00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal Impdcts, Should
the developer choose to defer the time of payment, hu my enter
Into i written agreement with the County deferring said pdyraent
tO the time of lievance of i building permit. ~ 19
ImprOvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending
· mlntmu~. of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries et I grade
IM 411 rimant at approved by the Riverside County Road Co.ntsstoner.
Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for
maintenance by County.
Electrical and comuntcattons trenches shall be provided in ~/
accordance wtth Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
'Z
· t
$c~c~le A - Teazn Z
February ~0. 1985
Con~ions
Page 3
3e
4e
6e
Aspbaltic e~ulston (fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be applied at a rate of O.OS gallon per ~uare yarJ. Asphalt
emulston shall confom to Sections 37, ~g and 94 os the State
Standard Specifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall
be constructed throughout the landdiviSIOn.
Corner cutbacks in conformante wath County Standard rio. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Pala Road and Via Gflbcrtu
and so noCed on the final map.
17. Landdivisions creating cut or f111 slopes adjacent to the Streets
shall provide erosion control. SIght distance co. Lrol and slope
easeaents as approved by the Road Depar~enL.
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance f~om [.M.W.O.
prior to the recordatton of the final map.
19. The mxtmun centerline gradient shall not exceed
0 ·
The mtntmun centerline radii shall be 300' or as approved by the
Road Department.
Street trees shall' be pTanted In conromance vtth the provisions
of Article 138 of Ordinance 460.53 and thetr location(s) snell
be shorn on street taprovement plans.
~2e
A11 driverays shall confom to the applicable RIverside County
Standards and shall be shorn on t~e scmt improvement plans.
The mtnfmue garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the
face of curb,
Z4 ·
fSe
The mintnun lo~ frontage shall be 20 feet measured along the
face of curb. · ·
All centerline Inter'sections shall be at 90* or radtal or as
approved by the Road Department.
PagL 4
26. Th~ street des(9n and Improvement conemOt of this project shall
be coordinated ,ith P.H. 20ZYl,'Tract Z9939.
ZY. Prior to or concurrently to the recordaMen of the final map.
the applicant shall co~nplete a suff~ary vacation.of'the superseded
existing dedication shall be applied fur and prgcessed for concurrent
action a~ the t~me of the adoption of the final map, If said
excess or superseded right of way is also County owned land, tt
may be necessary to enter into an agreement with the County fur
Its purchase or exchange.
'28.~ Prior to recordeaton of any phase of Tract Z9872, p~oceedtngs for
an.assessment dtstrlct for the construction of I four lane brtdge
on Pall Road it the Tmecula Creek shell be successfully completed,
GH:lh
Ver]r truly yours.
· ~P-# r.,/.,Z.e '
GaS Hughes.- Road Oivtsfon [;tgin'eer
113"~l~14~4[ t714) 717,i011
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
III'YBJIIIDL. CAI, IFOINIA tllOI
January 3, 1985
RIverside County
PZanntnS Department
County Administrative Center
~lverslde, CaZlfornla
JAN 81985
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
Attention: ReglonaZ Team No. 2
Ladles and GentSemen:
Re: Tract 19872
· (Amended No. 1)
Reference 18 made to tentative Tract 19872 located on the
southwest side of Pals Road between Tamecalm Lane and
..GlZberto In the Ranch· CaZlrorn18 area.
Our review ladleares the main streambed of Pechania Creek 11es
adjacent to the southwest tract boundary. The 100 year Pechanga
Creek rzov has been determined to be 7250 eta. Under extstlnS
conditions it appears the limits or the 100 year flood plain
extend outstde of the entrenched wash onto the southern portion
'or the tract (lncZudlnl lots 8dJmeent to "L" Street}, Ten~atlve
Tra~t 19939 located to the southeast has proposed construction of
the northeast bank of Feehangs Creek. Any proposed bank
protectton aS·el Pethang· Creek shouZd be coordinated w~th
tentative Tract 19939.
The appllcant's enllneer h·s ·ubmltted · conceptual drainage pZan
to the DIstrict. This'plan calls for ~he construction of
hardened bank protection alonl the existing entrenched portion or
Poohasia Creek. This protectlos Mould provide erosion protection
for Lots 182 Lbru 200. Other lots Zoosted adjacent to Pethangs
Creek wouZd be of sufficient also to provide.adequate setback so
the butldmbZe ·re·, It Is noted that · portlos of the proposed
hardened bank protection and perhaps some f111 would be Zoo·ted
offslam of the tract boundary, This offsite construction shouZd
-:/":.'.~..:~relocated oneIts,
R~verstde County
Planning Department
Re: Tract 19572
(Amended No. 1)
-2-
January 3, 1985
Following are the District's recommendations:
A study should be made to determine the 100 year flood
plain 11mira and flow velocities of Pechanga Creek. The
study should lncludea detailed topographic survey alon~
with supporting water surface profile calculations. Zf
realignment or alteration of the existing flood plaln
llmlts is proposed, the study should include a "before"
and "after" flood plain limit definition to determine the
effects on adjacent property. Any change in the flood
plaln on adjacent proper~y should not false the water
surface more than six 1riches.
Hardened erosion protection as conceptually shown on the
tentative map should be constructed along the banks of
Pethangs Creek to protect fill slopes and other areas
subject to erosion as determlned by the study referenced
in Condition No. 1. This hardened erosion protection
should be extended below the flow line of Penhangs Creek
a sultable distance (based on flow velocity) to prevent
undermining. The hardened banks should be located within
the tract boundary.
The Pechanga Creek 100 year flood plain limits through
the property should be delineated and labeled on an
associated environmental constraint sheet to accompany
the final map. The area within the delineated flood
plain limits should be labeled "flood plain" on the
ass,elated environmental oonstratnt sheet. A note should
be placed on the associated environmental constraint
sheet statlnl, "Flood plains shall be kept free of all
bulldlnls Ind obstructions, including fencing that would
,batrunt flows."
0
An erosion setback ZInc should be delineated and labeled
on the tameelated environmental oonstralnt sheet· The
erosion setback line should be established at a minimum
of SO f~et baok from ~d~e ~op of the extatSnl bank of
Peohanga Creek or as determined by the flood plain study
per reooumendation no, 1, Where hardened banW protection
is provided, the minimum setback distance can be reduced
to 25 feet.
Drainage facilities that outlet sump conditions should be
designed to convey the tributary 100 year peak storm
flow.
RIverside County
Planning Department
Re: Tract 19872
(Amended No. 1)
-3-
January 3, 1985
Drainage facilities located along side lot lines should
be located on one lot only.
Dralnsge fielit·tea loomted ·long side lot 11nes should
be concrete lined to · point beyond the bulZdable portlon
of the lot.
All lots should drain to the adJaoent street or an
adequate outlet.
The tract's dr·in·go system should be designed to
perpetuate the exlstlng drainage patterns.
Storm drsln fagill·lea leested outside of road right of
way should be gentmined within drainage easements shown
on the final map, Dr·in·go easements should not straddle
lot lines. A note should be added to the final map
starlag, "Drainage easements shell be kept oZear of
buildings and obstruotions,"
Buildings located adjacent to Poohasia Creek should have
the finished floors elevated · minimum of 1 foot above
the 100 year Pethangs Creek water surface elevation.
A copy of the grading plans, improvement plans, final map
and the associated environmental oonstralnt sheet along
wlth supporting hydrologto sad hydrsullc cslculstlons
should be submitted to the District for roytow prlor to
roeerda·los.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L, EDWARDS
Chief Engineer
DAVXD T. SHELDON
PZtnnlng Engineer
oo: Road Dept.
Dept. of Building & Safety
At·n: Erlc TrabouXay
SheXler & Lohr
DF~3: bE
DEPARTIIENT OF HEALTH
Planning Department - Team 2
D~tTm~, January lB. 1985
m, mom<//d~//H. Ralph LuchsL R.S.. Admtn. Supervisor - Envtromental Health Services D~'
T~act No. 19872
The Environmental Health Services DtvtsJon has reviewed
Amended Map No. 2 dated ~anuary 14, 1985. Our current con~nents
will remain as stated in our previous letter dated August 20, 1984.
IJt. L:cg
JAN 2 1 1985
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
P!,ANNIN~ COMMISSION
FOllln ~. I/ll
· , .I. ' e. IIre
NTY OF RIVERSIDE-DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
20, 984 AUG 2 2 984
RiVerside County Planning Department - Team
4080 Lemon St.
Riverside, CA 92501
RIVERS)~r. CCUNT'!
~" 'r"""'~ n').~...4,S~s-,~1
RE: Tract No. 19872; Being Parcels 1 through 4 of PH 7784 as shown in Bk. 30,
ixJ. g6 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County. (514 Lots - R-6)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 19872 and reconnends
that:
A water system shall be Installed accordtnq to plans and specifications
as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate,
with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
.the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the
· Internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and I
Joint specifications, and the size of the main at the Junction of the new
system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all resoects
with Otv. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code,
California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order
No. 103 of the Public Utilities Cmmtsston of the State of California,
· when applicable. The plans shall be signed by m registered engineer andft
mter company with the tolleating certification: "Z certify that the design
of the water system tn Tract No. 19872 is in accordance with the'mter
system expansion plans of the RlnchoClllforetl biter Dtstrtct led that
the'aster service, storage aM distribution system will be adequate to
providewater service .to.such tract. _This certification does not con-
stirate a 9uarantee'.that-ltvt11 supply'aster to such tract at any' sped c
quantities, flous or presswas for fire'protection or.lay other purpose."
Thts certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water
company. The plans must be sulxmttted to the County Surveyor's Office to
revtew at least two wee~s prior to the request for the fecordation of the
,anal map. ,
+his Department has a statement from the Rancho California Water District agreeing to
serve domestic water to each and every lot tn the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be
necessary for the financial arrangements'to be made prior to the recordation'of the
ftM1 map.
H. Ralph Luchs, R.S.
Administrative Supervisor
Environmental Health
)~lann;ng Department
T. PACT NO. 19872
-2-
August 20, lgB4
This Department has a statement from Eastern Municipal Water District agreeing to
allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the district.
The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved
by the district, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints
of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with
the original drawing, to the Count.v Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal
pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and Joint
specifications, and the stze of the sewers at the Junction of th~ new system
to the existing system. A single plat 1ridleering location of sewer lines and water
lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be
signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification
'! certify that the design of the Sewer system in Tract No. 19872 is in accordance
with the Sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District
· .and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this ttme to treat the
anticipated wastes from the proposed tract."' The plans must be submitted to
the County Surveyor's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request
for the recor~tion of the final map.
It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be ma~e Otter to the recor~atton
of the final map.
It will be necessary for the annexation proceedings to be cem~letely ftnaltzed'
prior to the recordatton of the final map.
Water and sewer availability ts contingent upon annexation into RCWO, E)iWD, & MWD.
This land division could not be approved as an R-6 development if sanitary sewer
service was not forthcoming.
St ncerely,
Administrative Supervisor
R!VERSI DE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
RAY HEBRARD
Jli~ CHIEF
January 15, 1985
] 10 WE,5-r SAN JACINTO AVENUE
FERRIS, CALIFORNIA 91370
TELEPHON E: (7 14) G$ 7-~ l 8 3
To 1
Attn z
Re s
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
Team ZZ
Tentative Tract No. 19872 - Amendment t2
Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above
referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the
following fire protection measures be provided An accordance
with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire
protection standards:
· ' · Schedule 'A" fire protection approves Standard fire
hydrants (6" x 4' x 2~") located one at each street
intersection and spaced not more than 500 feet apart in
any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more
than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow
shall be 500 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
MITIGATION
Prior to the recordtalon of the final map, the developer
shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department a
cash sum of 8300.O0~Jer lot/unit as mitigation for fire
protection impacts,' ShOuld the developer choose to defer
the time of payment, he may enter into a written agreement
with the County deferring said pal~ment to the time of
issuance of a building pemnit.
All questions regardi ~he meaning of the conditions shall be
referred to the Fire ~partment Planning & Engineering staff.
Sincerely,
PAY HEBRARD
County Fire Chief
MEG/sh
Plannine Officer
February 11, 1985
Ms. Nanc3) Maurtce
Sam Htcks Mortanent Foundation
P.O,Box 539
Temecula, CA 92390
RE: LUIS WOLF GRAVESZTE
TENTATIVE TRACT RO. 19872
Dear Ks. Kau~tce:
I am ,rtt4ng as a follow-up to our conversation on February 7, 1985-
regarding the Wolf Grave...
As I .Indicated to you, the Planntng Department has formulated a set
of conditions hc
The developer conditions prior to any prelim-
Inary grading of the stte or prto*r to recordErton of the ftnal map.
! .have enclosed a copy of these conditions..*
At tMs ttee, the c~ndtt~ons are.tentative 'and may be altered or
amended at the February 20, 1985 Planntng Cm~tsston Heartrig. You
are encouraged to attend the heartrig and offer your co~nents on the
ravefite and the tract. If you are uMble to attend, please feel
tee to wrtte a letter to Be which outltnes your coenents and sugges-
tions, and I ktll *present your concerns to the Planning Cmetsfion.
Ms ~om~ m tMt M ~s ~e great grabson of
Pt~'s m~er. a ~. Evel~ You , ts t~ riMdaughter of Mr. ~lf,
IN ~esently tves t~ Teg~a. Ne d~l M ~rktng
closely wtth
aM Flu aM ~~N durtN ~ graverite relocatton
·eel
4080 LEMON STREET. gv. FLOOR
46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 3
Ikir%ef% I'4AI I;'('IRNIA
Ms. Nancy ~urice'
February 11. 1985
Page -2-
Z thank you for your cooperation and appreciate the help you have offered
tO preserve this valuable historic resource. I look forward to working
with you and your organization over .the next few months.
· Sincerelye'
Laura R. Rines; Planner
Steve Becket, County Pmrks.Depmrisent
Mr. HcCoy, County CoronerJ~ Office
Donald Lohr, Shaller and Lohr
6abrtel Ptco
,
Conditions of A;4~rov~i .... "'
Page
53. Prior to any preliminary grading or recordatton of the final mayo whichever c
first, the Louis Wolf gravesite shall..be relocated as directed by'the Plann~-
Director.. All exhumation, relocatton and archaeological expenses'shall be t,
responsibility of the developer. The.relocatton shall follow'the following
proceedings, or other proceedings.as approved by the Planning Director:
m) The developer shall obtatn a court order, authorized by a member of the
· Wolf family or any other responsible party, to.remove'and relocate any re
· End the t_nm----bstone to m .site designated by the Planning Department,
b)' A qualified archaeologist shall be on stte during .any and all excavation
activities related t8 gravesite relocmtton.
c) The proper religious or other cerem~nles, as directed-by 'family members · &~other responsible party, shall' be performed upon exhumation,
d) All exhumation and relocattOn proceedings shall be.coordinated'With the
.... ~ . Riverside County Coroner's:Offtce and County Parks Depart=ant.
· · I~t'or t~ exhumation and relocation,' the.developer shall enter into an agr,
.... · with a local Temecula public or.private agency or organization for .the act
· . sition, relocatton 'and maintenance of the t~mbstone.and any remains conta'
..... -. within, Said agreement shall be subject-to' review by the Riverside Count'
:... . Parks Deparment Interpretire.Specialist and the Planning.Director, ' -'
.° "f~ Upon relocatton o~ the gravesite, .a permnent .plaqu~ shal~-be placed.on t)
.... tombstone which Indicates .that the gravesite ~ms previously located' on the
.... site of Tentative Tract No, 19872, A~I, No. 2, The language on the plaque
.. .....shall be subject to review 'by the .Riverside County Parks Department Znter;
· . Specialist, .The .cost of.the plaque ;shall be borne'.by th~ developer, '.
'LRR:;Ile;gm '
4
I. is tie tltt tdkglct II el ®f tim tilltHq Iltwll
..M~lrf&r,l flelt ~
~Irj~LtWfectlm
Imlltm ~lete kfet~
~J&.MI~ k~m & Factline
V4.~llmltlll
· ' ·: 1. IIII lie I.~t k~ e~ etplftceM ,till t. Wectst Tee.,._. le.J~
e®
4
t)& .
614
,I, Ib,r IP Irl#ftl
{ktel
Vicinity Map
!,.}j: .,.-
'=lbL ' .
/
/
/
/
/
{B~ /
~ /
~ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
'\
I
,/
/' ...."'-'--,: ....',',,. '>"'
/
i
I
i /
I
G|LI~RTO
ROAD
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 9, 1990
Conditional Use Permit No. 2
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
PREPARED BY: Scott Wright
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Larry Gabele
Markham and Associates
LOCAT ION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
To construct a multi-tenant automotive center with 8,824
square feet of retail area and 21,117 square feet of service
area.
Abutting the west side of Ynez Road and the east side of
1-15, approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of
Ynez Road and Solana Way.
C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial )
North: C-P-S { Scenic Highway Commercial )
South: C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial )
East: C-1/CP {General Commercial)
West: 1-15
Not requested.
Vacant
STAFFRPT\CUP2 1
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
PROJECT
STATISTICS:
DISCUSSION:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant ( approved auto dealership)
Vacant
Retail Commercial
1-15
No. of Acres:
Building Area:
Proposed Use:
Parking Provided:
No. of Service Bays:
3.0
21,117 sq.ft. auto service
8,824 sq.ft. retail
29,941 sq.ft.
Automotive retail and service
center
172 spaces
29
At a duly advertised public hearing on September 17, 1990,
the Plannin9 Commission approved Conditional Use Permit
No. 2 by a vote of 5-0.
The following changes to the Conditions of Approval were
included in the motion to approve:
Condition No. 5. On the advice of the City Attorney,
Condition No. 5 was changed to read as follows: In the
event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a
period of one (1) year or more, this approval shall become
null and void.
Condition No. 20. At the request of the applicant's
representative, the requirement to submit a signin9
program prior to issuance of buildin9 permits was replaced
by the following: "20a. The applicant shall submit a
signin9 program prior to occupancy."
Condition No. 24. The applicant's architect questioned the
need for a block wall alon9 the south property line. The
followin9 wordin9 was added to Condition No. 24: "if the
owner of the property south of the subject property submits
a discretionary application within two years of the approval
of this application or prior to occupancy of the project in
question, and said application shows a buildin9 located on
the south property line of the subject property, the
applicant shall not be required to construct said wall where
the buildin9 on the adjacent property abuts the property
Dine."
Condition No. 29. The requirement to submit a report by a
structural engineer was replaced by: "the requirement to
submit a report by a California licensed Soils Engineer or
Geologist to determine the potential for liquefaction or
subsidence and demonstrate appropriate mitigations."
STAFFRPT\CUP2 2
The applicant's representative requested that Condition No.
3 be changed to read "This approval shall be used within
two years of the approval date..." The case planner read
from the ordinance which allows approval period of up to
three years for conditional use permits with a provision
permitting extensions of time for approval periods of less
than three years. The Planning Commission took no action
relative to Condition No. 3.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE
Conditional Use Permit No. 2 based on the findings in the
attached Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of
Approval as amended at the Plannin9 Commission hearin9 of
September 17, 1990.
SW: ks
STAFFRPT\CUP2 3
P~.ANN ING COMM I SS ION M3NU'rEF,
AYES: b
COMM] SS] ONERS:
B] Fahev,
HoaaLand,
Chin]aeff
NOES: 0
None
COMMISSIONER HOAGT.AND
No. 13 to the regular
October 35, 1990,
AYES:
NOES: 0
to con ue Public Hearing Item
ina of the arming Commission on
by COMMISSIO BLAIR.
COMMISSIONERS: Blai Pahey,
Ford, gland,
Chiniaeff
COMMISSIONE
:
2. CONDITIONAl. USE PERMIT NO. 2
2.1,
Proposal to construct a multi-tenant automotive center
with ]0.024 sauare feet of retail area and 21,801 s~uare
feet of service area, north of the intersection of Ynez
Road and So]ana Way and reauest for SDecia] Review of
Parking.
SCOTT WRIGHT presented the staff report on this item.
He advised the Co~nission that the applicant has indicated
that the services provided will be quick turn around such
as lube, tune, tires, etc. and therefore, have requested
a special review of the parking reauirements. Staff has
agreed to allow 50% of the service bays to be counted
toward the parking requirement.
Mr. Wright brought special attention to the requirements
of Condition No. 24 pertaining to block wall and landscape
requirements on the easterly and southerly side of the
property.
IDA SANCMEZ, Markham & Associates, 41750 Winchester Road,
Temecula, representing the applicant, requested that
MIM.9tlV/90
-2- 9/21/90
~r.ANN I N~'; CO MM] SSION M [NlrrE.~
{',nD, dlt lnn No. ;~) t'~.~ ntr'~r~l t'l~-c: tO I'~aC! "Prl nv to
trl ~i~c'~ C~ "~r'l(~, ~o l':9~,'~r'~'~' ~t ht~'~ ~j~rlC~
~he a:so sta~ ~na~ :~oat, o Resnltxt~on No. BSbl haO h~en
annotPa by the County of Riverside and states that
Sir ~ctural Enaineers are no I. onqer reauired in certain
area,q considered to be jn Subsidence Zones and that th~s
project was in one of those areas. She provided staff
w~th copies of the Resolution and suaaested that Condition
No. 29 no [onqer pertained to this project. She also
provided copies of Ordinance 348 w.hjch a]]owed for special
review of ~arKinq reductions.
PETER DOLE, Architect, Co]bourn, Currjer & Knoll, 10675
Kl. na Street, San Dieao, auestioned the reauirement for the
block wa]Js. He stated that the orja]na] intent of the
wal,] was to screen the service bavs from Ynez Road and he
auest~oned the block wa].[ reau]rement for the south side
of the proDertV.
LARRY GABE),E, applicant, ]0706 Birch Bluff, San Diego,
stated that he has met with Bedford and that the
project meets w3th building standards for other buildings
in the area of the project. He added that they had
decided to use a landscape burm with retainer walls.
LOIS BOBACK advised the Commission that Condition No. 5
should be amended to read "this approval shall become null
and void".
IDa SANCHEZ reauested that Condition No. 3 be amended to
read "two (2) years of approval date".
GARY THORNRILL stated that he thought that the one year
expiration was an ordinance; however, he stated that they
would verify and amend the Condition accordingly.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing,
seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY and carried unanimously.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
None
MIN.9/17/90
-3-
9/21/90
Pr. ANN IN(; COrM [S,$1ON M
1990
CARY 'T'F!ORNM[f,f, t~c,~,t'~a ,~t arl~l,".~t~n,~ nl- the r~vlsl. ons to
n~ cf,r~strueten at toe t]me of issue of Cert]i~cate o~
Occupancy unless the adjacent OroDeFty has aDDroved plans
~r the bu]j~]no from t~e City Counci;.
SCOTT WRIGHT advised the Comm].ssion that Condition No. 3
was correct and wnutd remain as stated.
COMMISSIONRR FORD moved to adopt the Neqative Declaration;
adoot Resolution 90- aDDrovlnq Conditional Use Permit
No. 2: and, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2, based on
the analysis and fjndinas contained in the staff report
and subject to the Conditions of APProval with the
fn.iJow~inq modifications to the Conditions of Approva];
Condition No. 5 amended to read "shall become null and
void": Cond]t]on No. 20 amended to read "prior to
occupancy"; Condition No. 24 amended to read "If the
adjacent property owner. south of the subject property,
will submit the discretionary application 2 years from
th~s aPD]icatjon, showjnq a bu]ldinq ]ocated on the
south property line, then the applicant shall not be
required to construct the wall on the south side of the
project." and Condition No. 29 deleted. Seconded by
COMMISSIONER FAHEY and carried unanimously.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
3. PLOT PLAN NOS'. 5 AND 6
3.1
Proposal to construct two industrial buildings side by
side for a total of 23,700 square feet on two existing
parcels which together comprise 1.19 acres. Parcels are
located at the northeast corner of Avenida Alvarado and
Aqua Vista Way.
GARY THORNHILL provided the staff report on this item.
He stated that the applicant had submitted a earlier
proposal: however, staff expressed concerns in the
14IN.9/17/90
-4- 9/21/90
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Prepared By: Scott Wright
September 17, 1990
Case No.: Conditional Use Permit No. 2
Recommendation:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration
2. Adopt the Resolution Approving CUP No. 2
3. Approve CUP No. 2
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Larry Gabele
REPRESENTATIVE:
Markham and Associates
P R OPOSA L:
To construct a multi-tenant automotive center witl~
10,02~ square feet of retail area and 21,801 square
feet of service area.
LOCATION:
Abutting the west side of Ynez Road and the east
side of 1-15, approximately 200 feet north of the
intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way.
EXISTING ZONING:
C-P-S
Scenic Highway Commercial
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial )
C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial )
C- 1 / CP I General Commercial )
1-15
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant I approved auto dealership)
Vacant
Retail Commercial
1-15
PROJECT STATISTICS:
No. of Acres:
Building Area:
Proposed Use:
Parking Provided:
No. of Service Bays:
3.0
21,117 sq .ft. auto service
8,82~ sq.ft. retail
29,9~1 sq.ft.
Automotive retail and
service center
172 spaces
29
STAFFRPT\CUP2 1
BACKGROUND:
Conditional Use Permit No. 2 was originally
submitted to the Riverside County Planning
Department on December 19, 1989, as Plot Plan No.
1169u,. The site is located in the C-P~S, Scenic
Highway Commercial zone. Automotive service and
repair is permitted in the C-P-S zone subject to
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. County
Planning Staff mistakenly accepted the application
as a Plot Plan in the belief that the site is located in
the C-1/CP, General Commercial zone, which does
not require a Conditional Use Permit for the
proposed use. After the County transmitted the
application to the City of Temecula, City Planning
Staff informed the applicant of the requirement to
submit a Conditional Use Permit application. The
applicant submitted supplemental application
materials and Plot Plan No. 1169~ was redesignated
Conditional Use Permit No. 2 on June 15, 1990.
The applicant submitted a request for Special
Review of Parking (Attachment C) in conjunction
with the original application. The applicant stated
that the service uses in the proposed center would
be quick turn around services such as lube and
tune and tire shops rather than engine repair, body
shops, or other automotive services which generate
needs for longer term parking. On this basis,
County Planning Staff was willing to allow 50% of the
service bays to count toward satisfying the parking
req u i rement.
At the County Land Development Committee (LDC)
meeting of January 18, 1990, the application was
continued to the LDC meeting of April 12, 1990,
pending submittal of a Traffic Study and either a
geology/liquefaction study or clearance from the
County Engineering Geologist based on geologic
reports submitted in conjunction with the site~s
underlying parcel map. The County Geologist
provided clearance in the attached letter dated
March 7, 1990. At the LDC meeting of April 12,
1990, the application was continued to the LDC
meeting of June ~, 1990, pending submittal of
revised west elevations deleting the service bays
facing the 1-15 Scenic Highway Corridor and a
revised traffic study. The application was
transmitted to the City of Temecula on April 17,
1990.
Conditional Use Permit No. 2 was scheduled for the
Planning Commission hearing of September 10, 1990.
At the hearing of September 10, 1990, the applicant
STAFFRPT\CUP2 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
requested a continuance to the hearing of
September 17, 1990 in order to revise the site plan.
The project is to construct a multi-tenant
automotive service and retail center with a gross
floor area of 29,941 square feet, including 21,117
square feet of service area and 8,824 square feet of
automotive retail area. The application includes a
request for Special Review of Parking.
Geoloqic Hazards
County Geologic Reports No. 691 and No. 692 were
prepared for the underlying parcel map which
includes the subject property. The County
Engineering Geologist reviewed the Geologic
Reports with regard to the project in question.
Although the site is located in an Alquist-Priolo
zone, no evidence for faulting was found on the
site. The County Engineering Geologist found that
the report satisfies the requirements of the Alquist-.
Priolo Special Studies Act. The recommendations of
the report relative to liquefaction and seismic
potential shall be Conditions of Approval for this
project. I See Attachment B, letter from County
Geologist. )
Paleontoloqic Resources
The San Bernardino County Museum Director
commented that the property in question is located
on the fossiliferous Pauba Formation, and that
excavation may impact non-renewable paleontologic
resources. Staff is recommending a condition of
approval that the developer comply with the
recommendations of the Museum Director during
grading of the site in order to prevent the loss of
non-renewable fossil resources.
Stephen's Kanqaroo Rat Habitat
The site is located within the area designated by
Riverside County as habitat for the endangered
Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. The impact of
development within the Kangaroo Rat's habitat shall
be mitigated by paying fees which will contribute to
the implementation of Riverside County's Habitat
Conservation Plan. No SKR survey was requested
by the County of Riverside Planning Staff.
STAFFRPT\CU. P2 3
Mt. Palomar Street Liqhtinq Policy Area
The proposed project is located in the Mr. Palomar
Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area. In order
to prevent "skyglow" interference with the Mr.
Palomar telescope, low pressure sodium vapor
lighting shall be used.
Drainaqe
The site slopes downward gradually to the west and
drainage will flow to 1-15. Comments from the
California Department of Transportation indicate
that site drainage does not appear to have a
significant impact on the highway, but care should
be taken to preserve the existin9 drainage pattern
of the highway. There is a surface water pondin9
area alon9 the northwesterly side of the parkin9
area which serves as a detention basin to collect
storm runoff and slow the rate of downstream storm
runoff alon9 the highway to levels which
downstream drainage facilities can accommodate..
The pondin9 area shall be preserved when the
subject property is excavated and graded.
Traffic
The site is approximately 200 feet north of the
intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way. The
intersection currently functions at a peak hour level
of service F, the poorest level of service. A median
will be constructed on Ynez Road which will prevent
left turns into or out of the site. Project generated
traffic will increase southbound through traffic on
Ynez by approximately 10%, northbound traffic on
Ynez by approximately 3%, and southbound traffic
on Ynez turning left onto Solana by approximately
12%.
According to the Traffic Study submitted by the
applicant, signalization of the intersection,
additional through traffic lanes, and additional turn
lanes are necessary to provide a level of service
C/peak hour level of service D or better at the
intersection of Ynez and Solana. A temporary
traffic signal at the existing street width will be
installed in the near future. Street widening will be
necessary to accommodate the required number of
lanes.
The additional street width, construction of the
median, and relocation of the temporary signal will
STAFFRPT\CUP2 q
be funded by a Mello-Roos district. The district
has been formed, but design engineers have not yet
been selected and design criteria have not yet been
developed. The process of selecting consultants
and designing and constructing improvements could
take 12 months. If the proposed automotive center
is built and occupied before the street improvements
are constructed, there will be a temporary
worsening of the existing poor level of service at
the intersection of Ynez and Solana.
The Traffic Study was deemed acceptable by the
Transportation Engineering Staff.
Access and internal Traffic Circulation
The site plan indicates a driveway 40 feet in width
which will provide site access from Ynez Road for
the subject property and the adjacent property
north of the site. A reciprocal access easement
would be required for the shared driveway. All on;
site drive aisles are 24 feet in width and adequate to
accommodate two way traffic circulation. Turn radii
are adequate for delivery and refuse collection
trucks.
Parkinq and Loadinq Zones
Ordinance 348 requires automotive service uses to
provide parking at the rate of one space per 150
square feet or four spaces per service bay,
whichever is greater. One space per 150 square
feet or 141 spaces is the larger figure. 44 spaces
are required for the retail portion of the project.
The total parking requirement is 185 spaces. The
site plan provides 172 parking spaces which is 796
short of the total required by Ordinance 348.
The applicant submitted a Request for Special
Review of Parking on the basis that the proposed
automotive service uses will be restricted to the
quick turn around types of services rather than
engine or body repair services which typically
generate a demand for longer term, overnight
parking. Because the turn-around time would be
relatively short, the applicant requests that 13 of
the proposed service bays be counted toward
satisfying the parking requirement,
The County Land Development Committee originally
reviewed the Request for Special Parking Review
and agreed to count up to 50% of the proposed bays
STAFFRPT\CUP2 5
GENERAL PLAN AND
ZONING CONSISTENCY:
as parking spaces. The applicant proceeded in
good faith based on this agreement with the County
Staff. Moreover, in order to address the concerns
of the City Planning Staff, the applicant has
reduced the building area and added three loadin9
ZOneS.
The parking requirement for automotive service
uses is even more stringent than the retail
commercial parking requirement of one space per
200 square feet. No distinction is made between
engine and body work shops and those which
provide quicker services. For these reasons and
the circumstances cited above, the Staff is willing to
support the applicant's request that 12 of the 29
service bays be counted toward satisfying the
parking requirement.
Land Use
The proposed multi-tenant automotive service and
retail center is consistent with the Southwest Area
Community Plan designation of the site for
commercial land uses. The Scenic Highway
Commercial zone permits automotive service uses
subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
Scenic Hiqhway Corridor
The site is located adjacent to 1-15 which is
designated as a scenic highway. The Southwest
Area Community Plan contains the following scenic
highway policies which are applicable to this
project: the design and appearance of new
structures within the scenic highway corridor shall
be compatible with the setting or environment; all
new development shall maintain a 50 foot setback
from the highway right-d-way; the size, height,
and type of on-site signage shall be the minimum
necessary for identification and shall blend with the
environment; and substantial landscaping and
vegetation shall be utilized to protect and enhance
the view from the scenic highway.
The site plan indicates a substantial landscaped
area 15 feet wide along the 1-15 right-d-way. The
building setback from the 1-15 right-of-way is 56
feet. The site plan and elevations have been
revised to eliminate service bays from the west
elevation facing the highway. The site plan
satisfies the requirement to provide landscaping
STAFFRPT\CUP2 6
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
equal to 1196 of the parking area adjacent to State
and scenic highways.
An Initial Study was prepared for ConditionaI Use
Permit No. 2 and is attached to this Staff Report.
(See attachment A, Initial Environmental Study. )
Staff recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration
for Conditional Use Permit No. 2.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use is in conformance with the
Southwest Area Plan designation of the site
for commercial uses and is permitted in the
Scenic Highway Commercial zone subject to
approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
The project will not adversely affect adjacent
properties in that the on-site parking
provided is adequate to serve the proposed
intensity of development, and the developer
is required to protect downstream properties
from damages caused by alteration of
drainage patterns·
The site is adequate to allow the proposed
development in a manner not detrimental to
public safety or the area in which the site is
located in that the on-site parking is
adequate to serve the proposed intensity of
development. All drive aisles are of adequate
width to accommodate on-site traffic
circulation, and the amount of landscaped
area satisfies the applicable requirements.
The intersection of Ynez Road and Solana
Way, 200 feet south of the site, is already
functioning at level of Service F. The project
could temporarily aggravate the poor level of
service until street improvements which will
be constructed in approximately 12 months
provide an acceptable level of service at the
intersection.
A reciprocal access agreement with the
adjacent property owner north of the site will
be required to provide adequate access to the
site·
STAFFRPT\CUP2 7
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration;
ADOPT Resolution 90- approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 2; and,
APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 2,
based on the analysis and findings contained
herein.
SW: ks
Attachments:
Exhibits: 1.
2.
3.
A. Initial Environmental Study
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Request for Special Review
of Parking with supporting
letters.
Color Board
Elevations
Site Plan
Vicinity Map
STAFFRPT\CUP2 8
ATTACHMENT A
CItY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
Backqround
1. time of Proponent:
Larry Gabele
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
4725 Executive Square, Ste. 1040
La Jolla, California 92307
(619) 587-1985
August 10, 1990
4. Agency
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMEClYI~
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Location of Pln~posal:
Conditional Use Permit No. 2
(Formerly Plot Plan 11694)
The West side of Ynez Road, approx.
200 feet North of Solana Way.
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets. )
Ye. Js Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
be
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
de
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
ee
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site?
X
DI &IdVlCClC/~IDtlC
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands. or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water· Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
be
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any eReration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
Yes
X
.Mayb~e
No
...x.
X
X
X
R LA N K I I=SI FORMS -2-
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life· Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants l including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants ) ?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetstion, or in s barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
de
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species.
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish. benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes
X
Maybe
No
X
,f
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
be
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pest, tides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
be
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
In area?
Housing. Will the proposal effect
existing housing or create a demand for
mclditional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial eclditional
vehicular movement?
Yes
Mayb~e
X
No
X
X o
B LA N K I ES/FORMS
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
Yes
Maybe N__9o
X
Ce
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
x
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services· Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
X
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
X
f. Other 9ov·rnmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
16.
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
· need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
· . Power or natural gas?
17.
18.
19.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health ) ?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
· Iteration of or the destruction
of · prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in .averse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or eject?
C41
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause · physical change which
would effect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
Maybe
X
X
RLANK IFc;IFC~RM-~ -a-
Yes Maybe No
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prohistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future· )
Ce
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? ( A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small.
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Ill.
Environmental Evaluation
1 .a.b.
1 .c,d.
1.e.
1.f.
1.g.
2.a.
2.b,c.
3.a,c,
d,f,
Yes. Fill and topsoil replacement to a depth of 3 to 4 feet will occur.
Topsoil replacement is necessary to mitigate the potential for
liquefaction and subsidence. This is not considered a significant
impact.
No. The project will not result in substantial changes in topography or
destruction of unique geologic features. The site is flat, and
substantial changes in topography will not be required.
Maybe. The potential for wind and water erosion will increase during
construction. Wind erosion will be mitigated by the use of watering
trucks and planting vegetation after grading. Increased water runoff
due to the addition of impermeable surfaces will be accommodated by
drainage facilities as approved by the Engineering Department.
No. The site is not located near any body of water which would be
impacted by siltat/on or deposition.
No. County Geologic Reports No. 691 and No. 692 were prepared for-
the underlying parcel map which includes the subject property. The
County Engineering Geologist reviewed the Geologic Reports with
regard to the project in questions. Although the site is located in an
Alquist-Priolo zone, no evidence for faulting was found on the site.
The geologic report stated that structural setbacks for faults are not
warranted on this site. Secondary earthquake effects of lurching or
localized ground cracking can be adequately mitigated by proper
structural design. The report also states that the potential for
liquefaction and/or seismically induced ground subsidence can be
mitigated by replacement of topsoil and fill to a depth of 3 to L~ feet.
Localized deeper removals may be necessary. The County Engineering
Geologist found that the report satisfies the requirements of the
AIquist-Priolo Special Studies Act. The recommendations of the report
shall be Conditions of Approval for this project.
No. The project will not result in an increase in vehicle trips or an
increase in auto emissions. The nature of the project is not such that
it will attract substantial volumes of new traffic to the region.
No. The project will not involve any process which would create
objectionable odors or cause any alterations in the climate.
No. The site is not located near any streams or bodies of water.
Drainage will be directed to streets or to drainage facilities. The
project does not include any structure or excavation which would alter
the flow of direction of ground water.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 8
3.b.
Yes. Increased runoff due to the addition of impermeable surfaces will
be accommodated by drainage facilities as approved by the Engineering
Department.
3.e.
Yes. During construction, the proposed project will increase turbidity
in local surface water. This impact is temporary and is not considered
significant.
3.9.
No. The project will be served by the Rancho Water District and will
not involve any direct withdrawals or additions to ground water. Due
to the limited depth of excavation for soil replacement and compaction,
it is unlikely that ground water will be encountered.
3.i.
No. The site is not located in a flood zone.
4.a-d.
No. No unique, rare, or endangered plant species have been identified
in the area in which the site is located. The possible introduction of
new species of plants to the site as part of the required landscaping is
not considered a significant impact. The site is not used for any
agricultural crops.
Yes. The subject site is located within the area designated by
Riverside County as habitat for the endangered Stephen's Kangaroo
Rat. The impact of development within the Kangaroo Rat's habitat will
be mitigated by paying fees which will contribute to the implementation
of Riverside County's Habitat Conservation Plan.
6.3.
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during construction
and in the long term due to increased traffic volumes. This is not
considered a significant impact because the surrounding land uses are
not noise sensitive and noise levels are unlikely to exceed State daily
average noise level standards.
6.b.
No. The proposed project and existing and future surrounding land
uses are commercial in nature and will not create severe noise levels.
Yes. The proposed project is located within the Mt. Palomar
Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area. In order to prevent
"skyglow" interference with the Mt. Palomar telescope, low pressure
sodium vapor lighting shall be used.
No. The proposed project is consistent with the designation of the site
and its vicinity for commercial land uses.
9.a,b.
No. The project will not result in a substantial increase in the rate of
consumption of any natural or non-renewable natural resource.
10.a.
Yes. The proposed automotive center will involve the use of motor oil
and may involve the use of other hazardous substances. The applicant
shall provide a list of hazardous substances which will or may be used
on the site and a submit a plan for their disposal to the County Health
Department.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 9
10.b.
Maybe. If closure of a lane on Ynez Road during construction is
necessary, emergency vehicle response may be inhibited. Any street
or lane closures during construction shall be coordinated with the Police
and Fire Departments.
11,12.
Maybe. The project will provide additionai jobs and could attract more
population to the area. However, the number of new jobs created will
probably not exceed 100, and at least some of the jobs will be taken by
current residents of the area. The increase in population and demand
for housing in the area due to this project are unlikely to be a
significant impact.
13.a.
No. The on-site parking provided is adequate to met the needs of the
proposed land uses.
13.b.
Yes. The proposed automotive center is required by Ordinance 3L18 to
provide 230 parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows 171 parking
spaces and no loading zones. The potential for on-site peak hour
circulation and parking impaction is high and could cause retail
customers to attempt to park on adjacent properties.
13.c,d,e.
No. The project will not impact public transportation systems, air
water, or rail traffic, or alter present patterns of circulation.
1L~.a,b,
e,f.
Yes. The proposed project will require public services in the areas of
police, fire, road maintenance, and public facilities. Fire impact
mitigation fees and property taxes will provide adequate mitigation for
the additional need for public services generated by the project.
Maybe. Any impact on schools or recreational facilities resulting from
an increase in population due to new employment opportunities will be
mitigated by Conditions of Approval upon new housing.
15.a,b.
No. The proposed project will not result in a substantial use or
increase in demand for fuel or other energy sources.
16.a-f.
No. The proposed project will not result in a need for substantial
alterations of existing utility systems.
17.a,b.
Maybe. The project will involve the use of motor oil and may involve
the use of other hazardous substances. A list of hazardous materials
which will or may be used at the site and a disposal plan shall be
submitted to the City and to the County Department of Environmental
Health Services.
18.
Maybe. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic view
currently available to the public. However, the site is located adjacent
to the 1-15 scenic highway corridor. Building materials, colors, and
free-standing signage shall be compatible with the natural environment
and existing development. Free-standing signs shall be the minimum
size necessary for identification. The landscaping adjacent to the 1-15
STAFFRPT\CUP2 10
19.
20.a-d.
21 .a.
21 .b.
21 .c.
21 .d.
right-of-way shall be substantial and shall provide significant
screening of the site from view from the freeway.
No. The site is not currently used for recreational purposes and is not
located in or near a potential recreational trail a~ignment.
Maybe. The site is located in an area of paleontological sensitivity and
near an area of sensitivity for archaeological resources. The developer
shall retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to develop a site-
specific program to mitigate potential impacts to paleontologic
resources. The program shall include monitoring of excavation,
preparation and curation of specimens, and a report of findings with a
complete specimen inventory.
Maybe. The project will not degrade the environment. Any potential
reduction in Stephen's Kangaroo Rat habitat would be compensated by
participation in the Kangaroo Rat habitat conservation program.
No. Long term project generated traffic impacts will be mitigated by
planned street improvements.
Maybe. The project could contribute to the existing poor level of
service at the intersection of Ynez Road and 5olana Way if it is occupied
prior to construction of street improvements at the intersection. The
project would increase southbound through traffic by 10% and
southbound traffic turning left on Solana Way by 13%. These are
relatively small impacts, but will aggravate the poor level of service due
to existing traffic and projected traffic due to other projects and
growth in the area. The poor level of service will be mitigated by
construction of street improvements which will probably occur in
approximately 12 months.
Maybe. The project will involve the disposal of used motor oil. Used
oil will be recycled and will not be disposed in a manner which will
pollute soil or ground water. The use of any other hazardous materials
will require a clearance from the County Department of Health.
S]:AFFRPT\CUP2 11
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment. and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
fir. ant effect on the environment. there will not be a signi-
ticant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
describe on attache sheets and in the Conditions of approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have , significant effect on
the environment. and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
Dae Cj } t
For CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTACHMENT B
CITY Of TEMECULA
CONDITIONS Of APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit No. 2
Formerly Plot Plan No. 11694
Council Approval Date: October 9, 1990
Expiration Date: October 9, 1990
Planninq Department
The use hereby permitted by this Conditional Use Permit is for an automotive
center with 21,117 square feet of service area and 8,824 square feet of retail
area.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack,
set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory
agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Conditional User
Permit No. 2. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within one ( 1 ) year of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use is meant
the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval
within the one (1) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to
completion, or the beginnin9 of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval·
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit 3, or as amended by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one
(1) year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way,
The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Conditions of the City Division of Transportation Engineering
contained herein.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval of the City
Engineerin9 Department contained herein.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with
the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
transmittal dated January 19, 1990, a copy of which is attached.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control District's transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy of which is
attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section
of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated March
30, 1990, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Riverside County Geologist's transmittal dated March 7, 1990, a copy of
which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Transportation transmittal dated January 4, 1990, a copy of
which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the San
Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated December 22, 1989, a copy of
which is attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved
landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped
areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten
(10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher
than thirty (30) inches.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, nine (9) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all
requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied
by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by a
filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348.
A minimum of 172 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with
Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 172 parking spaces
shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit No. 3. The parking
area shall be surfaced with ( asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of
3 inches on 4 inches of Class I I base. ) ( decomposed granite compacted to a
minimum thickness of three (3) inches treated with not less than 1/2 gallon
per square yard of penetration coat oil, followed within six months by an
application of 1/4 gallon per square yard of seal coat oil. )
STAFFRPT\CUP2 2
18.
A minimum of 5 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit No. 3. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of
porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol
of Accessibility, The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area
and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a
conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not
less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the
following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility
in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
19.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
City Engineering
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
2O.
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division
of the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional and/or
revised plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval:
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans
Parking and Circulation Plans
20. a. The applicant shall submit a signin9 program prior to occupancy.
21.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit No. 2.
22.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit No. 1 l Color Board).
23.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
24.
Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety
Department, a six foot high decorative block wall or combination landscaped
earthen berm and decoi~a~ive block wall shall be constructed along the
STAFFRPT\CUP2 3
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
easterly 120 feet of the north property line and the entire length of the south
property line. The required wall and/or berm shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the
Planning Director.
If the owner of the property south of the subject property submits a
discretionary application within two years of the approval of this application
or prior to occupancy of the project in question, and said application shows
a building located on the south property line shall not be required to
construct said wall where the building on the adjacent property abuts the
property line.
The trash enclosures which are adequate to enclose a total of 4 bins shall be
centrally located within the project, and shall be constructed prior to the
issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height
and shall be screened from externa~ view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be
placed on a ten 110) to one ( 1 ) basis as approved by the Plannin9 Director.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan.
This project may be located within a subsidence or liquefaction zone. Prior
to issuance of any building permit by the City of Temecula. a California
Licensed Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and
Safety Department identifying the potential for subsidence or liquefaction.
Where hazard of subsidence or liquefaction is determined to exist,
appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstr,ied.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and
submit a written report to the Planning Director demonstrating compliance
with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this permit and
its Initial Study which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a grading
permit.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall prepare and
submit a written report to the Planning Director of the City of Temecula
demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation
measures of this permit and its Initial Study which must be satisfied prior to
the issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall prepare and
submit a written report to the Planning Director of the City of Temecula
demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval and
mitigation measures of the permit and its Initial Study.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 4
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is
based on J the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development) J the
number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of one-
half Jl/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the
fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required
under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
1 Class I I I bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate
bicycle access to the project area.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of planrings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to
the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly
constructed and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
38.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
39. Engine repair or body work services shall be prohibited.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
4O.
A detailed Drainage Study will be required to be submitted to the City
Engineer for review and approval. The Study shall be prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer and shall include existing, interim, and proposed
conditions, including hydrology and hydraulic calculations.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 5
Under sidewalk
Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.
drains shall be installed to City Standards.
A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within their right-of-
way.
43.
The developer shall submit four (4) copies of a soils report to the
Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and
geological conditions of the site.
The developer shall submit four (4) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
45.
The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance
of building permits.
46.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the
prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new
development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to
issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge
has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior
to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
48.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being
substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the
City Engineer.
49.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
50.
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
51.
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site.
52.
The applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following
agenci es:
- Eastern Municipal Water District
- City Engineer
- Environmental Health
- Fire Department
- Planning Department
- Riverside County Flood Control
STAFFRPT\CUP2 6
- Rancho California Water District
- Riverside Transit Agency
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
53.
All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment
permit.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans.
55.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
56.
The design and construction of improvements for Ynez Road shall be bonded
for in the event that the Mello Roos does not construct the required public
improvements in accordance with County Standard No. 100A ( 110'/134' ).
57.
Dedication shall be made of the following right-of-way on the following
streets:
DEDICATE YNEZ ROAD TO 67' FEET FROM STREET CENTERLINE
58.
Non-vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for Ynez Road
except for one driveway located at the north property line.
59.
The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the
adjacent property.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
60.
Construct full street improvements on Ynez Road including but not limited
to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway
trees and street lights.
61.
Ynez Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 55 feet
from centerline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 67 foot half-width
dedicated right-of-way in accordance with Riverside County Standard No.
100A, 1110/13~).
62.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public
facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for tra[[ic and
public facility mitigation as required under the El R/Negative Declaration for
the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an
interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated lassuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to
STAFFRPT\CUP2 7
63.
64.
65.
66.
protest such increase.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along all public street frontages in
accordance with Riverside County Standard Nos. [~00 and 401.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be
coordinated with adjoining developments.
Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's C.A.T.V.
Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V.
Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the City standards and the
approved signing and striping plan.
67.
Prior to occupancy, a sign shall be installed prohibiting left turns from the
project site.
68.
The traffic signal at Ynez Road and Solana Way shall be installed and
operational per the City Standards, special provisions and the approved
traffic signal plan prior to occupancy.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
69.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered traffic
engineer, and approved by the City Traffic Engineer and the City Engineer,
for all streets 66/44 or wider and shall be included in the street improvement
plans.
70.
Prior to designin9 any of the above plans, contact Transportation
Engineering for the design criteria.
Buildinq & Safety Department
71.
The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two
weeks processing time to obtain all required clearances prior to final
inspection.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 8
,m:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
~IVEPSiDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. BATE:
ATTN: John [~lstow
I TAL HEALTH SPEC I ALI ST I V
PLOT PLAN 11694
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot
Plan 11694 and has no ob.nectlons. Sanitary sewer and water
services are available in this area. Prior first L.D.C
meetlno. the follow~nu items w~ll be submitted:
"Will-serve" letters from the water and sewer~nc
aoencles.
If there are to be any hazardous materials. a
clearance letter from the Environmental Health
SeFvices Hazardous Materials Manaaement Branch
{Jon Mohoroskl. 358-5055). will De reauired
indlcatina that the Dronect has been cleared for:
a. Underuround storaae tanks.
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Servzces.
Hazardous Waste DIsclosure
accordance wzth AB 2185).
d. Waste reduction manaQement.
SM:tac
co: Jon Mohoroskz. Hazardous Materxals Branch
JAN 2 3 1990
RIVER61DE COUNTY
PLANNING Dc, PARTMEN'F
John F. Henntgs. r
Phillip L Forbes
Thomas R, McAliester
Edward P Lemons
Per~ ~ ~ucl
Lmda ~ Fregoso
McCorm~c~ Kidman
& Behrens
April 25, 1990
Riverside County Division
of Environmental Health
Land Use Section
Post Office Box 1370
Riverside, California 92502
SUBJECT: Water Availability
Reference:
Parcel Map 23960, Lot 2
(Ynez Auto Center)
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore,
would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWDo
ff you have any questions, please contact Senga Doherty at (714) 676-
4101.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Engineering Manager
F012A/dpw76f
cc: Senga Doherty
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
File
Pe II~ " I
DATE:
We have reviewed this case and ask that the following items be
addressed on an amended map.
Topography should be shown or corrected.
Show proposed grading and drainage.
Show how the project would be protected from storm flows.
Move structures/pads out of low area.
Proposed diversions should be corrected.
Show existing and proposed channels, culverts, drain pipes
and other such facilities.
Show existing watercourses.
F~:" ~'~ ,,s sA,~ o~ ~-X~,~:~0 p~,~(
C:
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
46-209 OASIS STREET. SUITE 405
INDIO. CA 92201
(619} 342-8886
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN J. NE%VMAN
FIRE CHIEF
3-30-90
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JOHN HISTOW
PLOT PLAN 11694 - AMENDED #1
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
3760 12TH STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
(714) 787-6606
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped
system (6"x4"x2~x2½), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than
165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved
vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from
any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow
requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer
and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify
that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements
prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department."
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s)· A statement
that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be
included on the title page of the building plans·
Subject: Plot Plan 11694 Page 2
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated
into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per
Section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code.
9. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered
must appear on the title page of the building plans.
10. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
11. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
12. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
13.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00
to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
14.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25C per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
15. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
a~la
iVE:IbiDE co uncu,
PL nni DEPendEnt
March 7, lggO
(Revised June 15, lggO)
GoD Soils, Inc,
24890 Jar?arson Avenue
P,0, Box 4g0
Hu~rieta, CA 92362
ATTENTION: John P, Frankltn
Albert R. Kletet
SUBJECT:
Alqu!st-Prfolo Special Studtee Zone/Ltque,actton Hazard
~.0.27B-A-RC
Plot Plan No, llGg4
A.P.N.: 9~1-080-C40
County Geologic ~eport Nos. Gel and 692
Temecula Area
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the seismic/geologic aspects of your repo,t entitled
"Prellm!nary Soils and Geologic Update Report, Parcel 4 of Parcel Map Ko.
23960, off of Ynez Road, Temecula, Ca," dated July 28, IgBg, and your addendum
dated February 27, 1990. ;
Your report determined that:
No evidence for faulting was found in the area o? the previously
established fault setback zone on this site. The potential for ground
rupture at t~e site is considered low.
The Wlldornar fault has been m&pped just westerly of the subject
property. Peak horizontal ground acceleration from a maximum credible
earthquake of 7.5 magnitude on this ?ault could exceed 0.TBg. Peak
horiZOntal ground acceleration from a maximum probable earthquake on
this ?ault could exceed 0.749.
Secondary earthquake effects o? lurching and/or localized ground
cracking could occur at this site.
The potential ?or tsunaml or seiche ts not considered pertinent to ~ite
developnmnt.
4080 LEMON STREET, 91'H FLOOR
' ' ' RFV2'RSfOE, CALIFORNIA 92501
.... C/'14) .7~.:6181 .._.
7'87'33 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, ~tJiTEE
BERMUDA DUNES. CALiFORt4%A
{61g) 342-8277
County Geologic Repcrt Nos. 091 and 692
Revlsed June 15, lggO
Pa~e 2
5. The potential for surface flooding at the site, although considered
low, Cannot be entirely precluded.
Indications o? major mass movement or major landsliding have not been
observed ar reported on the site.
Some of the sandy soil lenses present in the vlcinity o? 20 feet at
Boring B-3 have a potential for liquefaction. Subsidence aue to
liquefaction would be localized to nil and no manifestation o?
liquefaction is likely to occur at or near the ground Surface.
Your report recommended that:
i. Structural setbacks for faults are not warranted on this site.
The potential for surface flooding should be further evaluated by the
design ergineer.
Geologic inspections should be perfomed during site grading to verify
~eologic conditions relative to faultinc encountered both within or
t Zone.
~utside of the Alquist-Priolo Spec al Studi~s
4. In order to mitigate liquefaction potential and/or seismically induced
dynamic settlement, all existing fill and topsoil over the entire site
within areas o? settleant sensitive improvements shall be removed.
The average depth of removal is estimated at 3 to 4 feet, however
localized deeper removals may be necessary.
5. The exploratory trench backfill should be cleaned out, inspected by the
h
soils engineer. processed and replaced with fill w Ich has been
moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content and compacted
to a t least gO percent of laboratory standard.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner consistent
with the present 'state-of-the-art" and satisfies the requirements of the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones ~ct, the associated Riverside County
Ordinance No. 547. Final approval of this report is hereby given.
County Geologic Report Nos. 691 ard 692
Revised J~ne I~, 1990
Page 3
It should be noted ~ha~ the re~.ommendations made in your report now supersede
the reconTnendationS made in County Geologic Report No. 278 for this ~pecific
par~lo This revision ~pplies to both the fault setback zone and liquefaction
ml:Igation ~easures.
The recoTm~.en~ations made in your report shall be adhered to in the design and
Cor!StrdCtlOn Cf this project.
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Joseph A, Ri'hards, Plansing Dlrecto
S(even ~. r~n,/ ' ' oglst
CES 1205
SAK:Jg
cc: Markham and Associates - Ida Sanchez
CDMG - Earl Hart
Building & Safety - Norm Lostbom (Z}
Planning Tea~ 5 - John Rtstow
*TATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS, TRANSPO~TATIC)N AND HOUSING AGENCY
)EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8. PO. BOX 231
SAN ~ERNARDINO, C..ALIFC~NIA 9~40'2
TDD i714) 3834609
January 4, 1990
1990 ~evelopment Review
08-Riv-15-5.96/6.0
Your Reference:
OOUNT~ PP 11694
~;4~NT
GEC~GE DEUKN, EJIAN Goven~r
Planning Department
Attention Mr. John Ristow
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Dear Mr. Ristow:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Plot Plan
No. 11694 located between Route 1-15 and Ynez Road, north of
Solana Way in the Temecula area.
Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have
been indicated by the items checked and/or used by those items
noted under additional comments.
If any work is necessary within the State highway right of way,
the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work.
If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Thomas J.
Neville at (714) 585-4584.
Very truly yours,
/
H. N. LEWANDOWSKI
District Permits Engineer
Att
. .,.~ ,. :' .
(Your Reference) Date
WE WOULD LIKE TO NOTE:
Ca~u~cticm/~litiom wzr~j.n F~t or ~o~ S~te n~ of ~y ~d ~ ~v~t~ for
~i~] ~mr~ ~te (~M, ~~c~]~, etc.) ~ ~~ ~ ~ r~~ of
~to~ ~.
~ plans are sukmlitted, pie ccnform to the require-~nts of the attached '!~dout". This will
expedite the review prc~ess and time required for Plan Ck~ck.
Air. hough the traffic and dra3_nage ~nerated by this proposal do not apper to have a significant effect
on ~j~ state hlg~y system, ccllsideratlon nt~st be given to the cun,lative effect of contlmJed develcm~nt
in this arm. Any n~ures _n~r~__~ry to m~tigate the cumulative impBet of traffic and drainage shall be
provided prior to or with davelo[rmmt of the arm that necessitates then.
It appears that r/~ traffic and drainage generated by this proposal could have a sigmtficant effect on
the state highly syst~ of the ares. Any m~ures ner~ to mti~te the traffic and draa,qa~e
i~-Twts sh~ll be ~ncluded with tl~ developrent.
l!%is portiere of state rtigh~ey is included in the California Mester Plan of State High~ys Lli~.ble
for Official Sc~c Hi~h~ey Designati~, and ~n r. he future your ager~y my wish to )Bye r~Lis r~ute
officially a_~-Lgnated as a state scep. ic higJ~y.
Ikis portic~ of state high~ey has been officially designated as a state seetic high~ey, and develcTm-nt
in this corridor should be catmtible with the SCerLtC high~ey concept.
It is r~ t/mr there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heevily
traveled highways. Land developmint, in ordar to be cunpetible with this certain, my requmre ~spe~_ial
no:use atte~uaticc m~ures. Develo~t of property should include any nec--~-~y no~se att~muaucm.
%,I REQUEST THAT THE ITS, iS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
THIS PROJECT:
Normal right of way dedication to provide __
half-width on the state highway.
Normal street improvements to provide
half-width on the state highway.
Curb and gutter, State Standard
__along the state highway.
Parking shall be prohibited along the state highway by painting the curb red
and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" signs.
radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state highway.
A standard wheelchair ramp must be provlded in the returns.
A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to
limit physical access to the state hlghway.
Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the state highway.
Vehicular access to the state highway shall be provided by existing public road
connections.
Vehicular access to the state highway shall b: provided by
driveways.
standard
Veh~c~dnr Kc~ snail .~ot ~e prov~e~ w~r~nln of ~e Lnr~rsection an
VehiC,l~rr ~ tO ) state h. tgi~By sl~l l be providad by a rc~-t';~e conna:t~on.
Ve~Um,l~r ~ connecti~m shall be peved at leest wit.bin ~h~ state bj~.~ey
Landscapin~ along the state hi~y shall be low and forgiving in nature.
A left-turn lane, inc!udin8 any recas~zy witching, sh-~ be provided on the state hi~y
at
A traffic stL~ty incaring on- and off-site flow pattams and volumes, probable '~u~jwts, and proposed
=tti~ation ~dres ~j~ll be prepared.
Adequate off-street perking, which toes not require ;-,'king onto the stata highly, sh~ be provided.
~ lot sh~l l be developed iJl a ~8nnar that wi..tl r~Dt ca~ any vehi~,l~r xnovBrent ~,
n~_l,~iqg paft<nt~ sr~ll emtr~nca and exit, w~thin of n entr-arr. a from ~ stata ht~hwmy.
Handicap par~ing s~mll ~t be developed in the busy driws.my ~tranr, a arm.
Care ~h~l l be r. ak.!n ~ daveloping titis property to pre~erv~ z:d pe.,-petmta ) ex=st~nG ~
F~)ttern of ) .~cate .hi~y. Pa.rtic,,l~r cop.si~ticm should ':e givm to c,m,l~tive Lrf_reRsed storm
runoff to ~n. su~e r_hat a iLiCJ~.ay dr~Lnage problem i~ not crmteC.
Any ~ noise attenuation sh~]l be provided a~ part of ~j:e davelo~.~nt of this property.
L;E R
WE R
P!mse refer to attacne~ ad~LiKional ccrr. P. nts.
EQUEST:
A copy of a~y ca~iir~o~s of approval or revised approval.
A copy of any dccu~nts providing ~Mi tichal state highly ri,~ht of ~ay upon recordation of the nap.
EQUEST T,iE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW DURING THE APPROVAL PROCESS:
Any proLr~l s
A copy of ~e
A c,b~ck print
A d~.X print
to further d~v~lop ~ property.
traffic or e'xv'j.rc,~,=xt.s.l study.
of t. he Psrcel or TrBct ;,~p.
of the PLmm for any improveants witlttn the state hi~J~ay right of
of ti~ Gr-a~hg and Drainage Plans for this property ~n av~i l~hle.
Date: January 4, !990
Rlv-15-5~96,.6.i
(Co-Rte-PM;
PP 11694
(Ycur Referencei
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
?he Transmlttai letter, dated 12/22/89, Indzcates an Assessor's
Parcel number which does not agree with the AP numDer shown on the
submztted s~te plan.
The Ca!Trans Rzght-of-Way (R/W) shall be delineated wz~h the
"NO ACCESS" symbcl (see State R/W maps).
?he requlred cross-sections {see attached "HANDOUT": shall ex~end
a m2nzmum cf 1~ ;' beyond both sldes of %he R/W i~ne
.TE: Decenber 22, 1989
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety - Land Use
Building and Safety - Grading
Surveyor - Ken Tetch
Road Oepartment
Heal th - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control Dtstrtct
Ftsh & Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
California EdiSon - Daoug Davies
Southern California Gas
General Te)&phone
Caltrans #8
City of Temecula
Temecula Union School District
iVE:L DE COUnEY
L nnin DEPA EmEnE
Con~i sstoner Turner
San Bernardino County Museum
Conmuni ty P1 ans
JAN 1 C 1990
RNERSII)E CX)UNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLOT PLAN 11694 - (Ta 5) - E.A. 34633 -
Colbourn-Currter-Noll Architecture, Peter
Noll - Rancho California Area - First
Supervisorial District - W side of Ynez
Rd., between Winchester Rd. & Solana Way
- C-1/C-P Zone - 3 Acres - REQUEST:
Automotive retail and service - Mod 119 -
A.P. 921-080-e53,54
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Conmittee meeting has been t4ntattve)y scheduled for January 18, 1990. If it
clears, it will then go to public hearing."
Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to January 18, 1990 in order that we
may include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
John Ristow at 787-6356.
Planner
COMMENTS:
The parcel is located on the fossiliferous Pauba Formation. Construction excavation
will impact nonrenewable paleontol~ic resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to develop a site-specific
prOram to mitigate impacts to paleontolc.~ic resources. This program should include:
O~l~: rn~n~tnrini3 nf ~m~r~e&~n hy a nullified oaleontolc~lic monitor; (2) preparation of
recovered specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate fossils; (3)
P
I~L~i~Rr 1)t; !miil~lM~stlll~tg an established repository; and (4) a report of findings with
r%omplete specimen inventory.
1/7/90 ~'~
Dr. Allan D. Griesemer, Museums Director
4080 LEMON STREET, 9m FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92~K)1
(714) 787-al 81
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
III10% ~9,R077
Harc~ 7, 1~90
::I i V E ::I )i DE CO U~;,v
iq. ~il'ffi DEPA=KI Efi
a~
Gee Soils, Inc.
24890 Jailerson Avenue
P.O. Box 490
Hurtiota, CA 92362
Attention: John P. Franklin
Albert R. Kleist
SUBJECT:
Alqulst-Priolo Special Studies
Zone/Li~luefactAon Hazard
W.O. 278-A-RC
Plot Plan 11694
A.P.N.I 949-210-004
Count Geologic Report No.'s 691
and
Temecula Area
Gentlemen:
we have reviewed the seismic/geologic aspects of your report
of Parcel Hap 2 6 f of Ynez Road, Temecula, CA," dated
July 28, 1989, and ~our sddendum dated Februar~ 2~, 1990.
Your report determined thstl
No evidence for faulting was found in the area of the
previouly established fault setback zone on this site. The
~o~en~lal for ground rupture s~ ~he site is considered ~o~.
The Wildomar fault has been mapped Just westerly of the
subjec~ proper~y. Peak horizontal ground acceleration from
a maximum credible earthquake of 7.S magnitude on this fault
c~uld exceed 0.78 g. Peak horigon~al ground acceleration from
a maximum probable earthquake on this fault could exceed 0.~4
ge
Secondary earthquake effects of lurching and/or localized
ground cracking could occur st this site·
4. The potential for tsunsmi or setche is not considered
pertinent to site development.
The potential for surEace floodi,~ at the site, elthough
considered Xow, annrio& be entirely precluded.
Zndicatione of major mass movement or ma~or lendelidi~W have
not been observed o= =epozted ea ~be site.
4080 LEMON STREET. 9TH FU:X)R
RNERSIDE. CALIFORNIA
("11klal I'R?jMR1
AllleAttA~
711'33 COUNTRY CLUB IN:lIVE, SUITE E
BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201
342-8277
ell*JR BUIMURqJ ilU"t All GfiliJ
Gee Soils, InC.
March 7, 1990
Wage -2-
So~e of the sandy sell lenses present in the vicinity of 20
feet at Boring B-3 have a potential for liquefaction.
Subsidence due to liquefaction would be localized to nil end
no manifestation of liquefaction is likely to occur et or near
~he ground surface.
Your report racemended thstz
1. Structural setbacks for faults ere not warranted on this site.
The potential for surface flooding should be further evaluated
bM the design engineer·
Geologic inspections should be performed during site grading
to verify geologic conditions re2ative to faultinV encountered
both within or outside of the Alquis=-Priolo Special S~udies
gone.
In order to mitigate liquefaction potential sad/or seismically
induced dynamic settlement. all existing fill and topsoil over
the entire site within areas of settlement sensitive
improvements shall be removed. The average depth of removal
ie estimated et 3 ~o 4 fee~. however localized deeper removals
may be ~ecesser~.
The exploratory trench backfill should be cleaned out,
inspected b~ the soils engineer, processed s,d replaced wi[h
fill which has been moisture ~onditio~ed to at least optimum
moisture ~ontent end ~o~pe~ted to at least 90 percenn of
laidreVery standard.
It is our spinach tha~ the repeat was prepared in · compe~en~
manner GonsLeten~ with the present *ate=e-of-~he-ar~* and satisfies
~he requirements of the Al~ulet-Pziolo Special It.dies Zones Act.
~he eesoc~etedJq/vetside C~un~y Ot~nea~ NO, E47. final a~to~l
oZ ~hio se~:~ is ber~y give..
XC Should be noted that the reccx~mend,tione made in your report nov
supercede the ~e~-~nmendetAons made An County Seologi~ Report
ate for this specific parcel. This revision applies to both the
faul~ getbecK sons and liquefaction mitigation measures,
Hatch ~, 3,990
tags .-2 -
The reoom~ends~ions made in ~our report shall be adhered to in the
design and construction oE this proJeer.
Very truly yours,
C.~. Barkham and Asset. - Ida Sanubes
CZ~G - Earl Na~c
SuLlaiag 6 8are~y - ~o~ ~s~b~ (2)
ose Lchardl, F arming rector
ATTACHMENT C
GABELE & OMAN, CPA'S
June 14, 1990
Scott Wright
Planning Department
City of Temecula
RE: Parking Requirements for Plot Plan 111694
Dear Scott:
The purpose of this letter is to give you the background and
logic behind the parking layout for our proposed Plot Plan
#11694.
Prior to our first LDC meeting with Riverside County in
January 3990, we had one in-person =eating and several phone
conferences with the Planning Department and Traffic
Department to discuss the parking requirements for our
project. We were fully aware cf the exxs~ing parking
requirements for auto service centers and the reasoning
behind these requirements. In discussing these requirements
with the Planning Department, we pointed out that our center
was not going to be using long-term parking type tenants such
as auto body shops or engine rebuilding facilities and that
in fact the majority of our tenants were going to be quick
turn type tenants. By "quick turn" I mean operations such as
Precision Tune, Midas Brake and Mufflers, Blg-O Tires. These
type tenants work on a quick turn highly scheduled and in-
and-out type customer.
The Riverside Planning Department simply requested that we
give copies of our ~roposed leases to them to substantiate
the fact that we were not going to be using long term parking
type clients. With this information at hand the Riverside
Planning Department was going to allow us to count one out of
every. two interior service bays in our buildings as parking
to meet the parking requirements of the county.
In addition, we split the use of our property to be some
retail and some auto service. For the retail portion, our.
parking was calculated on five spots for every ~housand
square teat of usage and on the service side our parking was
calculated on six spots for every thousand square feet of
usage
Page 2
At our initial January 1990 meeting with the LDC, these
issues were discussed and approved by the planning group and
our plans have reflected that determination from that time
on.
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter,
please feel free to call me at (619) 587-1985.
· , ,
Ver~tr~ly yo~r~e,
JLG:Je
.tune :28, 1990
- I_
San Diego Regional
turn/Gahele
YNEZ PARTNERS
4275 Executive Squure #1040
La Jolla, CA 92037
This is to clarify Precision Tune's position on parking requirements for the center that will
be located on Ynez road in Temeeula.
Since tile bulk of our businer4 is based on quick convenient services, i.e. off changes and
tune ups, a majority uf our customers wait in our waiting room provided for their
convenience at our facility for services to be completed.
Apprcntirrmtely 30% of our customers come to our centers for, oil change service, this is
a drive through service and no parking is required.
Approximately 50% of our customers are tune up customers that will walt at our facility
for the completion of the repair work. Parking is only required for I Ihort perlad of time
to write up a service order. Upon completion of the service the customers pick-up their
,,'chiclos and depart from the premises as soon as the paper work is completed concludin8
tl',e trnnsaction.
Onh/about ~% of our customers will leave their vehicles with us for a period longer
than required to service it.
Since the majority nf our customers walt at our facfiltles and their vehicles are n]wny~
,crvic'cd within the center itself, the bay spaces should be considered u parking stnlts and,
outside parking requirements are at a vet7 minimum,
If you have any further questions or concerns please feel free to contact me.
SiACef,~y, .
'
Richard A, Jan, is
Director of Operations
,:3£ 10 UNIVERSITY CTR, LANE · SUITE 300 · SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 · (G19) 591-2435 · FAX 455-0169
A WNtrnan Comp&ny
July S, 19~0
Nr. Larry Gabfile
YNEZ PNtTNERS
4275 Executive Square, #1040
Le Jolla, California 92037
Dear Mr, Gabele~
Thts letter ts to discuss Mldas' typtCaq parkthe requirements for
I locatton wlthtn an auto Service center,
The majority of Midas' service involves exhaust work and brake
work. The average number of customers tn this typical size HideS
store Is 20 per day, The average exhaust job lists a~out 20
mtnutes, and the average brake JOb lasts Z7 mtnutes. TherefOre,
e large number of our customers wilt In our lobby ares for their
Cars tO be completed,
We have no need for overnight parklng and, as you can seem very
ltttle need for long-term parking. We feel that your Ynez Road
auto service center has an abundance of parking and that
consideration for parking within the bays iS Certalnly justified.
It is our experience that the auto body and patnt buslnesses and
engine Overhaul type tenants typically have a heavy lont-term
parking requtrCment, ~e 6o not locate in centers with these type
of co-tenants, He are $nxtous to enter the Temecula marketplace
as soon as possible, Please keep us updated as to your approval
process,
you should have e~y questions, please feel free to ca1! ~e at
~14/870-0411.
StncereTy,
Cherlts I~. Levenl
RegIOnal Real Estate Manager
leetern Area
i'i'6~T~.~no.u.lnoqloo
I:I:J.!.N:IO
O.l. fi~ Z3N:JA
Z
J-
.<!
""'F '
'--'4 .
.. ~
,* I"'
.\.,/;,,I,,,. *~
,I
#
/ \ !
/ '1
EXHIBIT 4
SITE
0
0
0
0
c~
TEMECULA
RANCHO CALIFORNIA
~0/~0
VICINITY MAP
- NO SCALE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2 TO
PERMIT OPERATION OF AN AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE/RETAIL
CENTER LOCATED ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, 200
FEET NORTH OF SOLANA WAY.
WHEREAS, Larry Gabelle filed CUP No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said CUP application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said CUP on September 17,
1990, at which time interested persons had an opporl. unity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commissior~
recommended approval of said CUP;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findincls. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65~360, a newly incorporated
city shall adopt a general plan within thirty ~30) months following
incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject
to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of
state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
~ 1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation
of the general plan.
{2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking
other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of
the following:
There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal
being considered or studied or which will be studied within
a reasonable time.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 1
{b)
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to
or interference with the future adopted general plan if the
proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
(c) The proposed use or action complied with all other
applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest
Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the
incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of
Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City.
At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while
the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed CUP is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
( 1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of
the general plan.
12) The Planning Commission finds, in approvin9 projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits,
pursuant to this title, each of the following:
(a)
There is reasonable probability that CUP No. 2 proposed
will be consistent with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to
or interference with the future adopted general plan if the
proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
(C)
The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.261e), no CUP may be approved unless the
applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health
safety and welfare of the community, and further, that any CUP approved
shall be subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the
health, safety and general welfare of the community.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the CUP proposed is
compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project
will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration,
therafore, is hereby granted.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 2
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the city of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves CUP No. 2
for the operation and construction of an automotive service/retail center located on
the west side of Ynez Road, 200 feet north of Solana Way subject to the following
conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED· APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
· 1990.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the 10th day of September· 1990 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\CUP2 3
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth herein
above in this Resolution of approval for CUP No. 2.
DATED: By
Name
Title
STAFFRPT\CUP2 4
ITEM NO. 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~k/,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Plannin9 Department
October 9, 1990
Plot Plan No. 11620
PREPARED BY:
Scott Wright
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
APPLICATION INFORMATION
OWNER:
Williams Development Company
APPLICANT:
Willjams Development Company
REPRESENTATIVE:
Markham & Associates
PROPOSAL:
To construct a two story office buildin9 with a total
floor area of 23,450 square feet and 17,675 square
feet of net leasable floor area, on a parcel that
contains 1.16 acres.
LOCATION:
The northerly side of Enterprise Circle North
abutting the southerly side of Santa Gertrudis
Creek.
EXISTING ZONING:
M-SC ( Manufacturin9 - Service Commercial )
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: Santa Gertrudis Creek
South: M-SC (Manufacturing - Service
Commercial )
East: M-SC (Manufacturin9 - Service
Commercial )
West: M-SC IManufacturin9 - Service
Commercial )
STAFFRPT\PP11620 1
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
DISCUSSION:
Not requested.
Vacant
North: Santa Gertrudis Creek
South: Vacant
East: Offices
West: Offices
Site Area:
Total Floor Area:
Net Leasable Floor Area:
Parkin9 Spaces:
Landscaped Area:
1.16 acres
23,450 sq. ft.
17,675 sq.ft.
88
7,020 sq. ft.
On September 17, 1990, the City of Temecula
Plannin9 Commission approved Plot Plan 11620 at a
duly advertised public hearin9 by a vote of 5-0.
The Plannin9 Commission minutes and Staff Report
are attached.
The following changes were made to the Conditions
of Approval at the applicant's request:
18.a.
Signs shall require separate permits from the
Planning Department (approval of a Plot Plan
application) and the Building and Safety
Department (issuance of a buildin9 permit).
The requirement for a report by a structural
engineer was replaced by the requirement for
a report by a California Licensed Soils
Engineer or Geologist to determine the
potential for liquefaction or subsidence and
demonstrate appropriate mitigation measures.
The Case Planner added the following Condition:
Buildinq and Safety Department
46.
The applicant shall fill out an application for
final inspection. Allow two ( 2 ) weeks
processin9 time to obtain all required
clearances prior to final inspection.
STAFFRPT\PP11620 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE
~,ND FILE Plot Plan No. 11620 based on the findings
in the attached Staff Report and subject to the
Conditions of Approval as amended at the Planning
Commission hearing of September 17, 1990.
SW: ks
SoTAFFRPT\PP11620 3
990
.... ' ~ ...... ~
ttn~].n~. ,on.arned in the start r.oort and s~ ject to
Condition. of APPrOVal as mo~jf]e~: Plot ~r No. ]1669,
APPrOVal No. 7 to ~emain is; No. 22
to read "R date~ Jul~ 3, 1989 as ed"; No. 23 to
read "on-s~te nin~ and striDi 24 to remain as
writtent Nn, 27 read "If the has not been paid";
No. 28 read "ReDor ated Ju[ 1989 as amended"; No.
43 ~e]ete~; No. 49 to written; Tentative Parcel
MaD No. 25633, Condor APPrOval No. 22 deleted; No.
3~ to remain as written the addit]on of a CC&R
a~reement ~or additi ; No. 41 to read "In the
event boD~ ~oes no ~st"; N 2 to read "In the
event bond does t extst": and 47 to remain as
written. COM S]ONER Rl.~]~ SeCODQ, M the motion.
CO~ISSIONK OAGLAND requested that dition No. 43
of the P] . PJan remain as written, and ISSIONER
o n I E d~d
her ot].on to reflect Condition No. 43 o~ the P[
PI n to remain as written, seconded by CO~ISS:
nanimous [ y.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, FaheV
Ford, Hoagland,
Chlnlaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
RECESS
CHAIRMAN DENNIS CHINIAEFF declared a recess a 8:15 P.M.
meeting reconvened at 8:25 P.M.
The
6. PLOT PLAN NO. 11620
6.1
Proposal to construct a two story office buildino
with 23,450 square feet of floor area, 17,675 leaseable
on the northerly side of Enterprise Circle north abuttiDg
Santa Gertrudis Creek. SCOTT WRIGHT presented the staff
report on this item.
MIN.9/1V/90
-10- 9/21/90
ne ~t~nm~ t te~ tot P tannl. nq I)eDaut.~le~t ~DDFOV8 [
~;1 idlna and Safety ])eDartment aDDrovaJ :"j Condition
No. 24 amended to read "a CaLl[ornta Licensed Soil
Kna~neer or aeo.loa~st"j addition o~ Condjt~on No.
46 to read "The aDDl. icant shaLL ~i. L L out an
8DDI ~CafiOD tot flna.I ~DsDect~on. Ai low two weeks
Drocessi. nq tlme to obtain aLL required clearances
prior to final ~nsDect~on."
IDA SANCHF, Z, Markham & Associates, reoresentlng the
applicant, stated their concurrence with staff's
recommendat i on.
COMMTSSIONRR ~AHP:Y moved to cJose the public hearing
and adont the Neqative OecLarati. on for Plot Plan No.
]3620: a~ODt Resolution No. 90- aPProvinQ Plot
PLan No. L1620: and approve Plot Plan No, 11620 based
on the analysis and flndinas contained in the staff
report and subject to Conditions of APPrOVal amended
as follows: add Condition No. 18A requesting a
separate Permit from the Planning Department and a
separate permit from the Bulldlng and Safety Department
for siqnaQe: Condition No. 24 amended to read "a
Ca.litorn]a I,jcensed Soi.I Enqj. neer or Geoloqlst": and
and Condition No. 46 to read "The applicant shall fill
out an application for final inspection. Allow two weeks
DrocessinQ tlme to obtain all required clearances prlor
to finai inspection" COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND seconded
the motion and followed by a unanimous vote.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoaqland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
None
MIN.9/17/90
-ll-
9/21/90
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 17, 1990
Case No.: Plot Plan No. 11620
Prepared By: Scott Wright
Recommendation: 1. Adoption of Negative Declaration
2. Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCAT ION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Willjams Development Company
Willlares Development Company
Markham E, Associates
To construct a two story office building with a total'
floor area of 23,L~50 square feet and 17,675 square
feet of net leaseable floor area, on a parcel that
contains 1.16 acres.
The northerly side of Enterprise Circle North
abutting the southerly side of Santa Gertrudis
Creek.
M-SC iManufacturing - Service Commercial)
North: Santa Gertrudis Creek
South: M-SC lManufacturing
Commercial )
East: M-SC ~ Manufacturing
Commercial )
West: M-SC I Manufacturing
Commercial )
- Service
- Service
- Service
Not requested.
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Santa Gertrudis Creek
Vacant
Offices
Offices
STAFFRPT\PP11620 1
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Site Area:
Total Floor Area:
Net Leaseable Floor Area:
Parking Spaces:
Landscaped Area:
1.16 acres
23,450 sq.ft.
17,675 sq.ft.
88
7,020 sq. ft.
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
Plot Plan No. 11620 was originally submitted to the
Riverside County Planning Department on November
27, 1989. The plot plan was reviewed by the Land
Development Committee on December 21, 1989 and on
April 2, 1990. The City received the case file on
June 6, 1990. At that time the Traffic Study had
not been received.
The proposal is to construct a two story office
building with 23,450 square feet of gross floor area
and 17,675 square feet of net leaseable building
area. There are 88 parking spaces, a landscaped
area of 10 feet deep abutting the street frontage,
and substantial interior lands capin9.
Drainaqe and Flood Control
The conceptual grading plan indicates that the site
will drain to Enterprise Circle North. The site's
underlying subdivision, Parcel map No. 19582-2 has
been cleared by the County Flood Control District
and the County Road Department in preparation for
recordat. ion. Improvement plans have incorporated
interim flood proofing measures that will protect the
tract from the 100 year storm event. The Santa
C;ertrudis Channel improvement is required to be
fully bonded as a Condition of Approval for Tract
19582-2. Deferrnent of construction of the channel
improvements until Tract 19582-2 is developed is
acceptable to the County Flood Control District.
Pursuant to the Riverside County Flood Control
District's recommendation, this project shall pay an
Area Drainage Plan flood mitigation fee of
$1,083.32.
Liquefaction and Subsidence Potential
The site is potentially susceptible to liquefaction
and subsidence. A liquefaction report was
conducted during the processing of the underlying
parcel map. The County Engineering Geologist
found that the report satisfies the requirements of
STAFFRPT\PP11620 2
the California Environmental Quality Act. The
recommendations of the report shall be Conditions of
Approval for the project.
Fault Traces
A Geology Study conducted in conjunction with the
underlying parcel map found active traces of the
Wildomar Fault in the vicinity of the site. The
Geology Report recommended a building setback
zone. The property in question is not one of the
parcels contained in the setback zone.
Access and Internal Circulation
A driveway 30 feet in width will provide access to
the site. All drive aisles in the parking area will be
24 feet or more in width which is adequate to
accommodate two way traffic and provide refuse
truck turn around space.
Parkinq
The 88 parking spaces indicated are adequate to-
satisfy the parking requirement for professional
business offices, {17.675 square feet of leaseable
floor area X 1 space per 200 square feet of leaseable
floor area = 88 spaces). 20% of the required parking
spaces may be compact spaces 120% X 88 = 18
spaces). The plot plan indicates 12 compact spaces.
Three handicapped parking spaces are provided in
compliance with State handicapped accessibility
requirements.
Traffic
According to the Traffic Study prepared for this
project, the proposed office building will generate
~20 daily vehicle trips, 60 of which will occur during
the peak evening hour. No off-site improvements
are needed to serve projected 1991 traffic volumes
including project generated traffic at the required
level of service. The developer is required to pay
traffic signal mitigation fees and area-wide road
improvement and public facilities fees. The Traffic
Study was deemed acceptable by the City Traffic '
Engineer.
STAFF R PT\PP11620 3
GENERAL PLAN AND
ZONING CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
Landscapinq
Ordinance 348 requires that 10% of the total parking
area must be landscaped wherever 50 or more
parking spaces are required. The substantial
amount of perimeter and interior landscaping shown
on the piot plan is adequate to satisfy the
requirement. The landscape strip abutting the
street is 10 feet deep in accordance with Ordinance
348.
The Southwest Area Community Plan designates the
site for Light industrial land uses. The site is
zoned M-SC t Manufacturing - Service Commercial )
which is consistent with the light industrial land
Use designation. Professional business offices are
a permitted use in the M-SC zone. Therefore, the
proposed office building is consistent with the zone
and land use designation in which it is located.
An Initial Study was prepared by City Staff for Plot
Plan No. 11620 and is attached to this report Isee
attachment). Staff determined that the project will
not result in any significant environmental impacts
and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration
for Plot Plan No. 11620.
The proposed office building is consistent
with the Area Plan land use designation and
the zone in which it will be located.
The project will not constitute an adverse
impact on surrounding land uses in that it
will be compatible with existing land uses in
the area; the site will not drain onto adjacent
properties, and project generated traffic will
not pose an undue burden on the streets in
the area.
The site is adequate for the proposed use in
that parking, internal traffic circulation, and
landscaping are adequate and meet
applicable requirements.
The site will have adequate access from the
street on which it has frontage.
5. Potential flood and liquefaction hazards can
STAFFRPT\PP11620 ~
be adequately mitigated.
The traffic generated by the project will not
constitute a significant adverse impact on the
level of service of the streets in the area and
the developer is required to pay traffic signal
mitigation and road improvement fees,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan
No. 11620;
ADOPT Resolution 90-
No. 11620; and,
approvin9 Plot Plan
APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11620 based on the
analysis and findings contained herein and
subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval·
SW: ks
Attachments:
Exhibits:
A. Conditions of Approval
B. Initial Study
C. Clearance Letter from
County Flood Control
1. Vicinity Map
2. Plot Plan
3. Elevations
4. Color Board
STAFFRPT\PP11620 5
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No. 11620
Council Approval Date: October 9, 1990
Expiration Date: October 9, 1992
Planninq Department
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for a two story office building
with 17,675 square feet of leaseable floor area.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan
No. 11620. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in
the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use is meant the
beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the
two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or
the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit 2, Plot Plan, or as amended by these
conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Engineering Department's Conditions of Approval, a copy of
which is attached.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the
provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal
dated February 27, 1990, a copy of which is attached·
STAFFRPT\PP11620 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control District's transmittal dated December 20, 1989, a copy of which
is attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section
of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated June 13,
1990, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Buildin9 and Safety - Land Use Section's transmittal dated
April 4, 1990, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside
County Geologist's transmittal dated February 4, 1988, a copy of which is
attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside
County Geologist's transmittal dated February 5, 1988, a copy of which is
attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30)
inches.
Prior to the issuance of grading or buildin9 permits, nine (9) copies of a
Parkin9, Landscapin9, Irrigation, and Shadin9 Plan shall be submitted to the
Plannin9 Department for approval. The location, number, genus, species,
and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all
requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied
by a filin9 fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348.
15.
A minimum of 88 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 88 parking spaces shall be
provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit No. 2. The parking area shall be
surfaced with aspbaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4
inches of Class II base.
16.
A minimum of three 13) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as
shown on Exhibit No. 2. Each parkin9 space reserved for the handicapped
shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of
porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displayin9 the International Symbol
of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area
and shall be centered at the interior end of the parkin9 space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parkin9 space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parkin9 space
STAFFRPT\PP11620 2
17.
18.
18a.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a
conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less
than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in
blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of buildin9 permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the followin9 agencies:
Engineerin9 Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of
the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of building permits the following additional and/or
revised plans shall be submitted for Plannin9 Department approval:
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shad/n9 Plans
Park/n9 and Circulation Plans
Signs shall require separate permits from the Planning Department ( approval
of a Plot Plan application) and the Building and Safety Department (issuance
of a building permit).
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit No. 3.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit No. 3 (Color Elevations) and Exhibit
No. 4 (Materials Board).
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655.
STAFFRPT\PP11620 3
This project may be located within a subsidence or liquefaction zone. Prior
to issuance of any building permit by the City of Temecula, a California
licensed Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and
Safety Department identifying the potential for subsidence or liquefaction.
Where hazard of subsidence or liquefaction is determined to exist, appropriate
mitigation measures must be demonstrated.
25.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is
based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development) (the
number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of one-
half (1/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under
the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
26.
One (1) Class I I bicycle rack shall be provided in convenient locations to
facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
27.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
28.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
Enqineering Department
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT:
29. All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
30.
The developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all
fees prior to the approval of the grading plan.
31.
Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks, Undersidewalk drains
shall be installed to City standards.
32.
The developer shall submit four 14) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
STAFFRPT\PP11620 4
33. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
34.
The developer shall submit four (4) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
35.
The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of
building permits.
36.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
37.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
38.
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
39.
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site.
4O.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
41.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
STAFFRPT\PP11620 5
developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
42. All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit.
All driveways shall conform to the County of Riverside Standard No. 207.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
45.
A permit from the Riverside County Flood Control District is required for
work within its right-of-way.
Buildincl and Safety
46.
The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two (2)
weeks processing time to obtain all required clearances prior to final
i nspection.
STAFFRPT\PP11620 6
COUNTY
P. XI ITMEXTf HE
() --:,- ~ ,
~ II
[~att~E,.vo.,e.~ 4065 COUNTY CIRCLE DRIVE RIVERSIDE,
7 1990
., ,,,, ,.s. ,,,. RI~SIDE COUNTY PL~NING DEPT~ NI~ ~UN 02-27-90
"~' NM~A HEALTH SPEC I ALI ST I V
. 0 L
E.l. COTN[ N.S
PLOT PLAN 11620
3055 RAMSEY STREET
BANNING. CA 92220
.40RTH ~OADWAY
kfTME. CA t2225
CAIA It. AIICA
7240 MARGUERITA
RIVERSIDE, CA 112504
COl~lA
S05 SOUTH 8U{NA VISTA
COiqONA, CA 11720
SSO NORTH STATE ST
I'~MET. CA 92343
lellO
46-209 OASIS STREET
INDIO, CA 12201
kAlE ILlliNE
30195 FRASER DR,
LAKE ELSINO~E. CA, 92330
PERIll
237 NORTH'D' STREET
PERRIS. CA 92310
IIVERlIll
1520 LINDEN STREET
RtVERSIDE. CA. lZ'LOT
lUllDOll
S888 MISSION 8LVD
RIVERSIDE, CA
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot
Plan 11620 and has no ob.~ectlons. Sanitary sewer and water
services are available ~n this area· Prior to building Plan
submittal. the following items will be submitted:
"WIll-serve" letters from the water and sewer~no
agencies.
Three complete sets of plans for each food
establishment will be submitted. including a
fixture schedule. a finish schedule. and a
plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance
with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities
Law.
If there are to be any hazardous materials. a
qlea[~Bqe._~q~q[ from the Environmental Health
Services Hazardous Materials ManaGement Branch
(3on MohoroskZ, 358-5055), will be required
indlcatln~ that the pro.lect has been cleared for:
a, UnderGround storage tanks.
b, Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
Hazardous Waste Disclosure (Zn
accordance with AB 2185),
d, Waste reduction manaaement.
SM:wdl
co: 3on MohoroskZ. Hazardous Materzals Branch
ReDIT to:
KENNETH I EDWARDS
1995 MARKET STREET
PO BOX 1033
TELEPHONE i714) 787-29!5
FAX NO ('714~ 788-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. ~
Planner6y~,.~.,,~,~
Re:
?P
Area: 'T"-"rnm~c.~m,..,~,
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of /PM i~ 5E)? The project will be
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~ave been constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
OHN H. ICASHUBA
S~OenH~ior Civil Engineer
DATE
The County Board of Supervisors has adopted the
~'E~C06~ ~A~y Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of
collecting drainage fees. Those fees are used to construct
needed flood control facilities within the particular area. The
Area Drainage Plan fees apply to new land divisions and other
types of new development.
Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff.
These increases are particularly troublesome in those watersheds
where an Area Drainage Plan has been adopted. In order to miti-
gate the downstream impacts brought about by increased runoff,
the District recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans
and Public Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation
charge. Mitigation charges, where appropriate, will be similar
to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate.
Following is the District's recommendation:
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall
equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied
by the area of new development. The new development in this
case includes a total of ~.lG acres. At the current
fee rate of $ ~ 3Za~ per acre, the mitigation charge
equals $ t0~3. 57_ . The charge is payable to the Flood
Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full
Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Mitigation Charge
(mitcharg)
RI~'ERSIDE .
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
46-209 OASIS STREET. SUITE 405
INDIO, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN J. NEWMAN
FIRE CHIEF
6-13-90
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
3760 12TH STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
(714) 275-4777
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GLORIA GUZM~
PLOT PLAN 11620 AMENDED #1
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
1. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM
for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"x4"x2½x2½),
will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any
portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways.
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s)
in the system.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow
requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer
and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify
that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements
prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department."
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement
that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be
included on the title page of the building plans.
Subject: Plot Plan 11620 Page 2
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated
into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per
Section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code.
9. A statement that the building will be autbmatically fire sprinklered
must appear on the title page of the building plans.
10. Comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code.
11. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
12. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
13. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
14.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $345.00 to
the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
15.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25C per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
16. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
April 4, 1990
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Gloria Guzman
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Administrative Office, 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
RE: Plot Plan 11620, Amended No. 1
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site
signage will be required.
Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B,
per Ordinance 655.
Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety
review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning
Department must be attached.
Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping
may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance
is required from the following:
° Temecula Unified School District
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
conform with an approved floor plan indicating the maximum
number of tenants allowed. Each space shall be labeled with
a number or a letter.
Sincerely,
Vaughn Sarkis ian
Land Use Technician
VS:sn
(714) 682-8840 · (714) 275-1820 · Fax (714) 3694084
.=R iDE COUR u,
PLArlRirI( DEPA: C IEII
February 4, 1988
Pioneer Consul rants
251 Tennessee Street
Redlands, California 92373
Attention: Mr. Michael C. Shea
Mr. Kyle D. Emerson
SUBJECT:
Alquist-Prioln ~npriA1 St~udies Zonp
J~. tO1)i=-l~lD"2
Parcel Map 19582-2
County Geologic Report No. 457
Rancho California Area
Gen tl emen:
We have reviewed your report entitled "Geological Investigation of the Witdomar
Fault, Parcel Flap 19582-2, Rancho California area, Riverside County, CA," dated
October 19, 1987, and your addendure report dated January 6, 1988.
Your report determined that:
Active traces of the Wildomar Fault have been found to trend through the
site at the locations shown on the grading plans, Exhibits 2A and 2B, and
the trench logs, Exhibits 3A, 3B, 3C and 3E.
Active faulting is confined to a distinct and well defined zone 9 to 54
feet wide centered on the western flanks and toe of the distinct
topographic escarpment trending northward along the proposed Enterprise
Circle North and the western margin of Lot 13.
3. No other faults were found on-site over the entire width of the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
No other geologic hazards are anticipated to affect the future development
of the site, except for liquefaction potential which is being addressed in
a separate report.
4080 LEMON STREET, 9'" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
{714) 787-6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
Pioneer Consultants - 2 - February 4, 1988
Your report recon~nended that:
A building setback zone should be established on the site which will
contain all known active traces of the Wildomar Fault through on the site.
Width of the setback zone will vary frown 85 to 155 feet as shown on Exhibit
2A.
2. All recent backfill placed in the trenches should be recompacted during
grading as per the recommendations of the soils engineer.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner consistent
with the present "state-of-the-art' and satisfies the requirements of the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, associated Riverside County Ordinance
No. 547, and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Final approval
of this report is hereby given.
We recommend that the following conditions be satisfied before issuance of any
County permits associated with this project:
The Building Setback Zone shown on the Geological Map (Exhibits 2A and 28)
in the report shall be delineated on the Environmental Constraints Sheet
(E.C.S.). The areas within the Building Setback Zone shall be labeled
"FAULT HAZARD AREA." This zone shall supercede the previous setback zone
shown on the E.C.S.
2. The following revised notes shall be placed on the E.C.S.:
(a)
"This property is affected by earthquake faulting. Structures for
human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault Hazard Area. This
constraint affects parcel numbers 12 through 16 and 26.'
(b)
'County Geologic Report No. 457 was prepared for this property on
October 19, 1987 by Pioneer Consultants, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern
are as follows: earthquake faulting, seismic design of
structures, and liquefaction."
Notes 2(a) and 2(b) above shall also be placed on the final Parcel Map with
the following addition to Note No. 2(a) ' as shown on the accompanying
Environmental Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the
office of the Riverside County S~rveyor."
A copy of the final map and Environmental Constraints Sheet shall be
submttted to the Planning Department Engineering Geologist for review and
approval.
Pioneer Consultants - 3 - February 4, 1988
This report supercedes the previous fault hazard investigation prepared for
this project by Pioneer Consultants in 1980. This report is also referred to
as County Geologic Report No. 199
SAK:rd
c.c Csaba Ko - Rancho California Development Co.
Joe McGee - Hawkins, Robertson & Assoc.
Norm Lostborn - Building & Safety {2}
Earl Hart - CDMG
Planning, Central Files
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPAR ENT
Roger S. Streeter- P1 'nin D' ector
Engineering Geol / ~ //
: iVE= iDE COUIl u,
PLArlrlirlG DEPA::I[filEII
February 5, 1988
Pioneer Consultants
251 Tennessee Street
Redlands, CA 92373
Attention: Mr. Nicholas Z. Selmeczy
Mr. David W. Turner
SUBJECT:
Liquefaction Hazard
J. N. 20b"~--01~2
Parcel Map 19582-2
County Geologic Report No. 457L
Rancho California Area
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Geotechnical
Engineering Report, Parcel Map 19582-2, Rancho California, CA," dated
October 19, 1987, and your response letter dated January 18, 1988.
Your report and response determined that:
There is a liquefaction potential in the subsoils which would have an
effect on the proposed development on Lots 5 through 12 and 21 through 26.
There is also a potential for soil liquefaction in the remaining lots, but,
because of the depth of the potentially liquefiable layers, the proposed
fill placement on the parcels and/or the relatively high fines content
(silt and clay) of the near-surface soils, soil liquefaction should not
have an effect on the proposed development. These are lots 1 through 4 and
13 through 20.
Settlement or loss of bearing capacity for proposed structures induced by
soil liquefaction in the near surface soils is not anticipated if the
recommendations made in your report are followed.
The deeper soils underlying the 10 foot thick well compacted layer may
experience liquefaction, and in turn a minor amount of ground subsidence
may be induced by the densification effect of liquefaction. This potential
liquefaction of the deeper lyinq soil layers will not produce intolerably
large differential settlements in the proposed structures.
4. The potential of lateral spreading due to soil liquefaction adjacent to the
proposed stream channel is considered minimal.
4080 LEMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46'209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
fR1 q~ .'t4~-R~>77
Pioneer Consultants - 2 - February 5, 1988
5. There is a potential that on certain lots where the soils are prone to
liquefy, storage tanks buried in the ground may get damaged.
Your report and response recommended that:
For Lots 5 through 12 and 21 through 26, a sufficiently thick layer of
nonliquefiable soil, that is, compacted fill below the foundation elevation
of the proposed buildings, should be provided. The required thickness of
this layer should be equal to or greater than two times the width of the
proposed foundations. Assuming that the foundation depth will be limited
to not more than two feet and the footing width to not more than four feet,
the thickness of the nonliquefiable layer should be at least 10 feet below
proposed finish grade. This nonliquefiable layer can be provided by either
placement of compacted fill and/or removal and replacement of the existing
soils as compacted fill to the required depth.
Additional analysis should be performed concerning the effect of soil
liquefaction on underground storage tanks. This should be based on the
particular circumstances and design at the time when the basic design
information becomes available.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner and
satisfies the additional information requested under the California
Environmental Quality Act review and the Riverside County Comprehensive General
Plan.
We recommend that the following note be placed on the Parcel Map prior to its
recordation: "County Geologic Report No. 457L was prepared for this property
on October 19, 1987, by Pioneer Consultants and is on file at the Riverside
County Planning Department. The specific items of interest are liquefaction
and seismic design of structures."
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING
Roge~_.S. S reeter - Planni
CEG-1205
SAK:rd
c.c. Csaba Ko - Rancho California Development Co.
Joe McGee - Hawkins, Robertson & Assoc.
Norm tostbom - Building & Safety (2)
Planning Central Files
CITY Of TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
Willjams Development Company
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
27715 Jefferson Ave.
Temecula, CA 92390
676-8~7~
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Auqust 21, 1990
4. Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Plot Plan No. 11620
Location of Proposal:
Northwesterly side of Enterprise
Circle North abutting Santa Gertrudis
Creek. A.P. #909-281-010
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached
sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
ae
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, cempac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
X
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
STAFFRPT\PP11620 1
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslid·s.
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate. whether locally
or regionally?
Water· Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Ce
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
ee
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or ground waters?
Yes
Maybe
X
X
X
NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFF R PT\PP11620 2
Yes Maybe No
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants I including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
ao
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
{birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11620 3.
Yes Maybe N__o
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare· Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
ae
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset· Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances l including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFR PT\PP11620 ~
14.
15.
16.
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
Substantial impact upon existin9
transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or 9oods?
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f®
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
ee
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services:
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
ae
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
be
Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Yes
X
X
X
X
Maybe
X
~0
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11620 5
Yes Maybe No
17.
18.
19.
20.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard l excluding
mental health ) ?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation, Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources·
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11620 6
Yes Maybe No
21.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wiidiife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? ( A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP11620 7
Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
Earth
1.8.
1.b.
1 .c,d.
1.eo
1.f.
1.9.
Air
2.a-c.
Water
3.a,c,
d,f,g.
Maybe. The potential for liquefaction on the site may be mitigated by
the addition of compacted fill or by removal and replacement of existing
soil as compacted fill. Removal and replacement of existin9 soil would
be a change in geologic substructure, but would not be considered a
significant impact.
Yes. Site preparation will involve compaction or overcoverin9 of the
soil. This is required to prevent liquefaction and is not considered a
significant impact.
No. The project will not result in any substantial changes to existing
topography. There are no unique physical features on the site.
Maybe. The potential for wind and water erosion will increase durin9
construction. Wind erosion will be mitigated by the use of watering
trucks and the planting of vegetation after grading. Increased water
runoff will be accommodated by drainacje facilities as approved by the
Engineering Department.
No. The flood control channel adjacent to the rear of the site is fully'
improved with concrete lining. On-site landscape planting will prevent
soil erosion.
Maybe. The site is located in an area potentially susceptible to
liquefaction and subsidence. A liquefaction report was conducted
during the processing of the underlying parcel map. Mitigations
recommended in the report include placement of compacted fill soil or
removal and replacement of existing soil as compacted fill. The County
Engineering Geologist found that the report satisfies the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendations of
the report shall be conditions of approval for the project.
The Geology Study conducted in conjunction with the underlying parcel
map found active traces of the Wildomar Fault in the vicinity of the site.
The Geology Report recommended a building setback zone. The
property in question is not one of the parcels in the setback zone.
No. Except for emissions from project generated traffic which are not
considered significant due to good ambient air quality, the project will
not result in substantial emissions, objectionable odors, or alterations
in the climate.
No. The site will drain toward the street into drainage facilities as
STAFFRPT\PP11620 8
3.b.
3,e,
3.h.
3.i.
Plant Life
~.a-d.
Animal Life
5.a-c.
Noise
6.a.
approved by the City Engineer. Grading of the site as proposed wil)
not alter the direction of drainage. Excavation of the site wiil not be
extensive enough to cause changes in the direction or flow of
groundwaters. The project will be served by water and sewer districts
and will neither directly add to or withdraw from the aquifer.
Maybe. Any additional runoff caused by the addition of construction
and paving on the site will be accommodated by drainage facilities as
approved by the City Engineer,
Maybe. During construction, the proposed project could increase
turbidity in local surface water. The use of water trucks to sprinkle
the site during grading and construction will minimize increases in
turbidity. This impact is temporary and is not considered significant.
No. The proposed project will not significantly affect the public water
supply.
No. The site is located in Flood Zone A. The site's underlying
subdivision, Parcel Map No. 19582-2 has been cleared by the County
Flood Control District and the County Road Department in preparation
for recordation. Improvement plans have incorporated interim flood
proofing measures that will protect the tract from the 100 year storm
event. The Santa Certrudis Channel improvement is required to be'
fully bonded as a Condition of Approval for Tract No. 19582-2.
Deferment of construction of the channel improvements until Tract
19582-2 is developed is acceptable to the County Flood Control District.
No. No unique, rare, or endangered plant species have been identified
in the area in which the site is located. The introduction of new species
as part of the required landscaping is not considered a significant
impact. The site is not used for any agricultural crops.
Yes. The subject site is located within the area designated by
Riverside County as a Stephence Kangaroo Rat habitat conservation fee
area. Any impacts on the Kangaroo Rat habitat will be mitigated by
paying fees which will contribute to the implementation of Riverside
County~s Habitat Conservation Plan. The site has already been graded
and no burrows were noted. The parcel immediately east of the site has
already been developed.
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during
construction. Long-term noise impacts will occur due to increased
traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant since
the surrounding land uses are not noise sensitive.
STAFFRPT\PP11620 9
6.b.
No. The project is an office building and will not generate severe or
unusual levels of noise·
Liqht and Glare
Yes. The proposed project is located within the Mr. Palomar
Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area which recommends the use of
low pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lights to help avoid interference
known as "skyglow" with the Mt. Palomar telescope· The use of LPSV
lights will reduce the light and glare produced by the proposed project.
In addition, all lights shall be directed on-site and not off-site.
Land Use
No. The proposed office building is consistent with the designation of
the site and its vicinity for light industrial and service commercial land
uses. The proposed project is similar to and consistent with existing
land uses in the vicinity.
Natural Resources
No. The project will not result in a substantial increase in the rate of
consumption of any natural or non-renewable resources.
Risk of Upset
10.a.
No. The project will not involve the use of any hazardous substances
other than typical cleaning agents. This is not considered a significant
hazard.
10.b.
Maybe. Any street or lane closures during construction shall be
coordinated with the Police and Fire Departments in order to prevent
interference with emergency vehicle response.
Population and Housincl
11,12.
Maybe. The project will provide additional jobs and could attract more
population to the area. However, the number of new jobs created will
be fewer than 100, and at leaat some of the jobs will be taken by current
residents of the area. The increase in population and the demand for
housing in the area due to this project are unlikely to be significant
impacts.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a,f.
No. The project will generate 420 daily vehicle trips, 60 of which will
occur during the peak evening hour. No off-site improvements are
needed to serve projected 1991 traffic volumes including project
generated traffic at the required level of service. The developer shall
be required to pay a fee to contribute to the installation of a traffic
signal at the easterly intersection of Enterprise Circle North and
Winchester Road when State traffic signal criteria ar~ met and to pay an
area-wide road improvements and public facilities fee.
ST AFFRPT\PP11620 10
13.b.
No. The amount of on-site parking provided is adequate to meet the
needs of the proposed use.
13.c-e.
No. The proposed project will not result in a substantial impact on
existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation.
Public Services
14.a,b,e,f.
The proposed project wilI require public services in the areas of police.
fire, road maintenance, and public facilities. Fire impact mitigation
fees and property taxes will provide adequate mitigation for the
additional need for public services generated by the project.
14.c,d.
Maybe. Any impact on schools or recreational facilities resulting from
an increase in population due to new employment opportunities will be
mitigated by conditions of approval upon new housing.
Enerqy
15.a,b.
No. The proposed project will not result in a substantial use or
increase in demand for fuel or other energy sources.
Utilities
16.a-f.
No. The proposed project will not result in a need for substantial
alterations of existing utility systems.
Human Health
17.a,b.
No. The proposed office building will be constructed in accordance
with the Uniform Building and Fire Codes and will not result in
exposure of human beings to potential health hazards.
Aesthetics
18.
No. Development of the site will not obstruct any scenic view that is
currently available to the public. The landscaping of the site and the
architecture of the building will be adequate to prevent a visually
offensive appearance.
Recreation
19.
No. The site is not currently used for recreational purposes.
Cultural Resources
20.a-d.
No. The site is not located in a designated area of archaeological or
paleontological sensitivity. If any cultural or paleontological resources
are found during excavation and grading, an archaeologist or
paleontologist shall be brought on-site to determine whether the
artifacts are significant and to supervise their preservation if
appropriate.
STAFFRPT\PP11620 11
Mandatory Findinqs of Siqnificance
21 .a.
No. No rare or endangered plant species have been identified in the
area in which the project is located. The project will be subject to
mitigation fees for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation
Plan. The site has already been disturbed by rough grading done in
conjunction with the underlying parcel map.
21 .b,c.
No. The project will not result in any significant Ion9 term or
cumulative impacts in that Santa Gertrudis Flood Channel improvements
are required as a Condition of the site's underlyin9 parcel map, and the
developer is required to contribute fees toward installin9 a traffic
signal at Enterprise Circle North and Winchester Road when traffic
conditions meet State warrants for signalization.
21 .d.
No. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings in that flood control and traffic signalization improvements are
required and construction must conform to Uniform Building and Fire
Code requi rements.
STAFFRPT\PP11620 12
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ticant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
For CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFFRPT\PP11620 13,
.E
r84 :OXGLOvE CIR 63 A
85 AEIAM CIR 64 ViA MONTARO
65 VIA MUN.SARATE
'~ A
6~.'.';COR1E GAR ° /'~ L
70 CAROLWOOD C1
71 WHIEP[RING WiND C1
72 OLD SPRINGS RD
73 tON{)UN On
76 IJRA[WO(.ID CI
79 CALt E ESPA:~A
80 BUFFY WY
81 CORTE FLAMENCO
82 ATHENA LN
83 MIMOSA DR /'~- ,
~O't'~"/ ~ '/
,
C~em~r o~
I Commerce
"'~" 118rT1
CouRt~/
Admin. Ctr.
'~\RD
,r, rj .
./,,,,,%
EL,.'
Winchester uare SOL \
thw ~)~
AUTO
brary
C~[i Border Patrol
Ha .: Area HQ
~. ....
vE,
R[
34..
C
,/
Ctr. ~4s k
i ~1 ~ .
?,
li ........
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 11620
TO PERMIT A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING AT
ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH ADJACENT TO SANTA
GERTRUDIS CREEK.
WHEREAS, Willlares Development Co. filed Plot Plan No. 11620 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on
September 17, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
the following findings:
Findincls.
That the Temecula City Council hereby makes
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
(a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
STAFFRPT\PP11620
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and
meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Governn~nt
Code, to wit:
~1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
~2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building-
permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30~c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
( 1 ) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan
requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law
and City ordinances.
(2) The overall development of the land is designed for
the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare;
conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible
with the present and future logical development of the
STAFFRPT\PP11620 2
surrounding property.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
ms compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
project will
Declaration,
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Plot Plan No.
11620 for the operation and construction of a two story office building located at
Enterprise Circle North adjacent to Santa Gertrudis Creek subject to the following
conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1990.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
. day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\PP11620
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for Plot Plan No.
DATED: By
Name
Title
STAFFRPT\PP11620
ITEM
NO.
10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 9, 1990
Substantial Conformance No. 9
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCAT ION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Steve Padovan
Receive and File
Brookstone Development
Vince Daly
To relocate the driveway at the southern corner of
the site and to remove 3 parking spaces on an
approved plot plan.
Southern corner of Bueking Drive and Madison
Avenue.
M-SC (Manufacturing - Service Commercial)
North: M-SC
South: M-SC
East: M-SC
West: M-SC
Not applicable.
Vacant
ST'A F F R PT\SC9 I
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
North: Light I ndustrial
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
Site Area:
Gross Building Area:
Gross Leasable Area:
72,390 sq. ft.
16,255 sq.ft.
12,656 sq.ft.
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
The project is part of the North Jefferson Business
Park development located north of Winchester Road
and west of 1-15. Plot Plan 11556 and related case
Plot Plan 11557 were created as parcels 12 and 13 of
Parcel Map 23561-1.
Plot Plan No. 11556 and Environmental Assessment
No. 34413 were approved by the County of
Riverside through a Plannin9 Director Hearing on
March 12, 1990 and by the City Council of the City
of Temecula on April 10, 1990.
The subject project involves two 2-story office
commercial buildings with a total 9ross floor area of
16,040. The applicant is requestin9 to relocate the
reciprocal driveway at the southern corner of the
site completely on the property. Also, three (3)
parkin9 spaces will be eliminated due to the
relocated driveway.
The Planning Commission approved Substantial
Conformance No. 9 based on Staff findings and the
addition of conditions to the ori9inal approval. The
project meets all parkin9 and zonin9 requirements
and will not be detrimental to surroundin9
properties.
GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
It is likely that the project will be consistent with
the proposed General Plan for the City of Temecula.
Class 3, Categorically Exempt.
STAFFRPT\SC9 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE
AND FILE Substantial Conformance No. 9 based on
the analysis and findings in the Plannin9
Commission Staff report which is attached.
SP: dd
Attachments
1. Staff Report
2. Conditions of Approval for Plot Plan No. 11556
3. Maps and Exhibits
STAFFRPT\SC9 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Substantial Conformance No. 9
Council Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planning Department
The leasable floor area of the two buildings shall not exceed 13,000 square
feet·
All approved conditions for Plot Plan No. 11556 are applicable to this project
and shall be complied with prior to occupancy.
STAFFRPT\SC9 1
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 17, 1990
Case No.: Substantial Conformance No. 9
Prepared By: Steve Padovan
Recommendation: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCAT ION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Brookstone Development
Vance Daly
To relocate the driveway at the southern corner of
the site and to remove 3 parking spaces on an
approved plot plan.
Southern corner of Buekin9 Drive and Madison
Avenue.
M-SC J Manufacturing - Service Commercial)
North: M-SC
South: M-SC
East: M-SC
West: M-SC
Not applicable.
Vacant
North: Light Industrial
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
Site Area:
Gross Building Area:
Gross Leasable Area:
72,390 sq.ft.
16,255 sq.ft.
12,656 sq.ft.
~ STAFFRPT\SC9 1
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY:
ENV I RONMENTAL
DET ERMI NAT ION:
The project is part of the North Jefferson Business
Park development located north of Winchester Road
and west of 1-15. Plot Plan 11556 and related case
Plot Plan 11557 were created as parcels 12 and 13 of
ParceI Map 23561-1.
Plot Plan No. 11556 and Environmental Assessment
No. 34413 were approved by the County of
Riverside through a Planning Director Hearing on
March 12, 1990 and by the City Council of the City
of Temecula on April 10, 1990.
The subject project involves two 2-story office
commercial buildings with a total gross floor area of
16,040. The applicant is requesting to relocate the
reciprocal driveway at the southern corner of the
site completely on the property. Also, three
parking spaces will be eliminated due to the
relocated driveway.
The applicant is relocating the driveway due to the
fact that they were unable to obtain an easement to
share the driveway with the adjacent property
owner. The relocation of a driveway results in the
elimination of 3 standard parking spaces which
lowers the total number of parking spaces for the
project to 65.
The original plot plan was approved with 68 parking
spaces based on 13,694 square feet of leasable floor
area. The revised plans show a leasable floor area
of 12,656 square feet which requires 63 parking
spaces at a ratio of 1 space for every 200 square
feet. Therefore, the revised plans have adequate
parking. The landscape planter between the
relocated driveway and the parking spaces has been
increased in width to 18 feet. In addition, a
condition will be added which will limit the amount of
leasable floor area to under 13,000 square feet to
ensure adequate parking.
It is likely that the project will be consistent with
the proposed General Plan for the City of Temecula.
Class 3, Categorically Exempt.
STAFFRPT\SC9
2
FINDINGS: Site Approval
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed use will not have a substantial
adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. The use will not
generate excessive noise, vibration, traffic
or other disturbances.
The site for the proposed use has adequate
access.
The project will not have a significant
adverse effect on the environment.
There is a reasonable probability that the
project will be consistent with the General
Plan once it is adopted, based on analysis in
the staff report.
There is a probability that the project will not
deter, or interfere with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately
inconsistent with the new General Plan.
These findings are supported by staff
analysis, minutes, maps, exhibits, and
environmental documents associated with this
application and herein incorporated by
reference.
The lawful conditions stated in the approval
are deemed necessary to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
APPROVE Substantial Conformance No. 9 based on
the analysis and findings in this report and the
attached Conditions of Approval.
SP: ks
Attachments
1. Conditions of Approval for
Plot Plan No. 11556
2. Maps
3. Exhibits
STAFFRPT\SC9
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Substantial Conformance No. 9
Council Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
The leasable floor area of the two buildings shall not exceed 13,000 square
feet.
All approved conditions for Plot Plan No. 11556 are applicable to this project
and shall be complied with prior to occupancy.
STAFFRPT\SC9
!f
I
P{,ANNING COP4M]~ION MINUTES SEPTEMBER ]'i, 1990
Toe (~flrTIlDI S%].OI~ voted on the mntl. or~ a~ tc~ +ows:
N<)RS: I COMM[SSIONERS: BLair
ABSTAIN: 2 COMMISSIONERS: HoaQ]anO,
Chiniaeff
Assistant City Attorney, LOIS BOBACK, advised the
Comm3ss]on that the absta3n3na vote aoes in favor
of the motion and therefore the motion carries as
CHAIRMAN DF.NNIS CHINIAF. FF returned to the chair.
15. SUHSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE NO. 9
PrnDosai to reJocate a dr3vewaV on the southwest
corner ot the project [ocated at the southern
corner oi Buekjnq Drive and Madison Avenue.
GARY THORNHILL provided the staff report. He
stated that the reason for the re]ocation of the
driveway was due to an uncooDerative adjacent
property owner.
DAVID I.ESEKE, representative, expressed their
concurrence with staff's recommendation.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to approve Substantial
Conformance No. 9 based on the analysis and
findings in this report and subject to the
Conditions of Approval, seconded by COMMISSIONER
HOAGLAND.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford,Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
None
MIN.9/17/90
-19~
9/21/90
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
MTG:
DEPT:
TITLE:
PLOT PLAN NO. 11556
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CZTY MGR
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Plot Plan No. 11556.
Backqround
Case No.:
Applicant:
Representative:
Location:
Proposal:
Zoning:
Surrounding Zoning:
Surrounding
Properties:
Plot Plan No. 11556
Brookstone Development
Brookstone Development
PO Box 939
Lake ElsEnote, CA 92330
Southeast corner of Bueking Drive and Madison
Avenue.
To construct two 2-story office buildings on a 1.13 acre
parcel. One building will be 8,067 square feet, and the
other 7,973 square feet.
M-SC, Manufacturing - Service Commercial
All surrounding properties are zoned M-SC.
The subject property is currently flat and has been
previously graded. The properties to the north are
developed with industrial buildings and the properties
to the south, east, and west are currently vacant.
Analysis
Plot Plan No. 11556 and Negative Declaration Environmental Assessment No. 3qJ413
were approved by the County of Riverside through a Planning Director Hearing
on March 12, 1990. The project is part of the North Jefferson Business Park
development created through Parcel Map No. 23561-1, and consists of two 2-story
office buildings of 8,067 square feet and 7,973 square feet on 1.13 acres. Sixty-
eight 168) parking spaces have been provided and all parking and building
setbacks meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The architecture is
contemporary and compatible with the surrounding area.
Fi~,al Impact
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee:
Flood Control Mitigation Fee:
$2,905.00
$ 721.00
Summary
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Plot Plan No. 11556.
~LOT
PL~,N
'SITE,
NO.
.x/iC. LK_! ~! Y ~,P
II
,~ --/~/~PlSc'N ---
KEY PI AN
51Te,_
CASE HISTORY
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
Plot Plan 11556, Amendment No. 1
Brookstone Development
Southeast Corner Bueckin9 Drive and Madison Avenue
PROPOSAL:
BACKGROUND:
CONDITIONS:
MITIGATION
F S COLLECTED:
Ri..~~ENDATION:
JN 89205
MISC2:PL
Construct 2 office buildings on 1.13 acres. Building
"C" is 16,000 sq. ft.. Building "D" is 13,694 sq. ft.
The proposed project was submitted to the County in
December, 1989, and referred with a recommendation of
approval to a Planning Director Hearing on March 12,
1990. The project was subsequently approved by the
Planning Department.
The project was approved with standard conditions as
well as special Road Department conditions as follows:
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
project proponent shall provide a striping and
signing plan for the intersection at Jefferson
Avenue and Buecking Drive, and for the
intersection at Jefferson Avenue and Sanborn
Avenue, to implement intersection approach lane
geometrics as follows: two northbound through
lanes, one northbound right turn lane, two
southbound through lanes, one southbound left
turn lane, one westbound right turn lane, and
one westbound left turn lane at each intersection·
Any widening or other improvements necessary to
implement such plan, as approved by the Road
Commissioner, shall be constructed at no cost to
any government agency.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed, the Santa
Gertrudis Creek Bridge on Jefferson Avenue shall
be improved to its full ultimate section.
$2,905.00 towards Traffic Impact/Signal Requirements
$ 721.00 towards Flood Control Mitigations
RECEIVE AND FILE.
................. ~ I IH:)~r¢
NOSB3JJ3C H,LI:ION I i
Z
I--
LLI
BU$ NESS PARK
12&
13
OWNER: ARTHUR H. NELSON & DEBRA NELSON
31681 RIVERSIDE DRIVE
LAKE ELSINORE, Ca 92330
PARCEL N UMBERS: 910-200-092 & 910-200-093
STRAIGHT BARREL MISSION
TILE 'OLD ADOBE' BLEND
#500 BY M.C.A.
ACCENT PAINT COLOR TO MATCH
EXPO STUCCO COLOR
#B-582 D/C
PRIMARY STUCCO
INTEGRAL COLOR
#50 PEACH CREAM BY EXPO
PAINT COLOR OF DOOR,
WINDOWS, AWNINGS & RAILINGS.
#4985A BY FRAt. EE
SUBMII'FA~. TO ll~E CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF TE]qECULA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROWN PLA~QNING DEPARTMENT
SUBMII'FAL DATE: 3/12/90
SUBJECT: Notice of Decision of Plot Plan 11556 Amd. 1 acted on by the Planning
Director on March 12, 1990
RECOm~ENDE3) MOTION:
Receive and File the Notice of Decision for the following Plot Plan acted on by
the Planning Director on March 12, 1990.
- Plot Plan 11556 Amd. 1 - Brookstone Development - First Supervisorial
District - City of Temecula - 1.13 acres - M-SC zone.
- APPROVAL of Plot Plan 11556 amd 1 based on findings and conclusions
incorporated in the Staff Refport dated 3-12-90.
PROJECT LOCATION:
Southeast corner of Buecking Drive and Madison Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
The project is part of the North jefferson Business Park development located
north of Winchester Road and west of 1-15. Plot Plan 11556 and related case
Plot Plan 11557 were created as parcels 12 and 13 of Parcel Map 23561-1.
JR:gs
c. OTHER:
ZONING:
a. SITE:
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
CASE SUMMARY DATE: MARCH 12, 1990
EA: 34413
CASE NO. PLOT PLAR I10. 11556, ARERDED 1113. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Two Office Buildings at the Southeast
corner of Buecklng Drive and ~dtson Avenue
AREA/DISTRICT:Temecula
GENERAL PLAN: South West Area Plan
LAND USE: C- C~,,~rcial, Category II
OPEN SPACE/CONS.: Not designated as open space
Mount Pal anar
M-SC
b. ADJACENT: M-SC
LAND USE/AREA DEVELOPMENT:
a. SITE: Vacant
b. AOjACENT: Vacant, Business Park
MAJOR ISSUES: Liquefaction Zone, Flood Plain, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat,
Paleontological Resources (Pauba Formation)
RECOI~ENDATION: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for E.A. 34413 and APPROVAL
Of ROT PLAM RO, 11556, AI~]IOED RO, I based on the following:
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The project ts cmststent with the General Plan.
2. The project meets the requirements of Ordinance 348.
3. The project is cmpattble wrlth surrounding development.
4. The project has no significant environmental effects and a Negetattve
Declaration my be adopted.
d'HR:lt:sc
3/08/90
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING DATE: ~arch 12, 1990
RIVERSIDE COtJiffY PLAMNING DEPARTMENT
COMI)ITIOS OF APPROVAL
Brookstone Development
P.O. Box 939
Lake Elsinore, Ca 92330
PLOT PLAN RO. 11556, MMERDED NO. 1
Project Description: Two Office Buildings
Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-200-09).
Area: Temecula
1. The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for two office buildings on
1.13 acres
The permittee shall defend, tndennify, and had hamless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees frQn any claim, acti on, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body
concerning PLOT PLAM I10. 11556, Altql)ED I10. 1. The County of Riverside
will promptly notify the pemittee of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the
defense. If the County fails to prmptly notify the permittee of any such
claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense,
the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify,
or hold hamless the County of Riverside.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date;
otherwise it shall becane null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to c~npletton, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the pr~tses shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan mmrked Exhtbtt A, Mended No. 1, or ms amended by these
conditions.
In the event the use hereby pemttted cases operation for a period of one
(1) year or more, this approval shall becm~ null and void.
Any outside lighttrig shall be hooded and directed so as not to shtne
dtrectly upon adjoining property or publlc rights-of-way.
The applicant shall cmply with the street improvement recmndattons
outlined in the County Road Department transmittel dated 2-1-90 a copy of
which is attached.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11556
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
8. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department
transmittal dated 1-10-90 a copy of which is attached.
9. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control District transmittal dated 1-6-90 a copy of which is
attached.
10. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate
section of Ordinance 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated
1-10-90 a copy of which is attached.
11. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Building and Safety Land Use Section transmittal dated
1-16-90 a copy of which is attached.
12. The applicant shall conply with the reconmendations set forth in the
Department of Building and Safety Grading Section transmittal dated
11-16-90 a copy of which is attached.
13. The applicant shall comply with the reconmendations set forth in the
per Director's Hearing"'3T-12-90)
14. The applicant shall conply with the reconmendations set forth in the San
Bernardino County Museum transmittal date 11-12-90, a copy of which is
attached.
15. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved
landscape, irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy
pemits. An autonatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all
landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition.
Planting ~thin ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be
permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches.
16. Prior to the issuance of building pemtts, six (6) copies of a Parking,
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Deparl~ent for approval. The location, number, genus, species,
and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all
requirecents of Ordinance No. 348, Section, 18.12, and shall be
accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No.
348.
17. The irrigation plan shall be in accordance with Ordinance No. 348, section
18.12 and include a rain shut-off device. In addition, the plan will
incorporate the use of in-line check valves, or sprinkler heads with check
valves incorporated to prohibit low head drainage.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11556
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
A minimum of 68 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with
Section 1B.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 68 parking spaces shall
be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A, Amended No. 1. The
parking area shall be surfaced with asphalttc concrete paving to a minimum
depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base.
A minimum of three (3) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as
shown on Exhibit A, Amended No. 1. Each parking space reserved for the
handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized
sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller
than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of
the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottm of the
sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height
of 36 inches fr~n the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk.
A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance ~o
the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in
size with lettering not less than 1 inch in height, which clearly and
conspicuously states the following:
'Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed
away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning ."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of
accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall ~btain
clearance and/or permits fr,n the following agencies:
Road Department
Envt ro,,ental Heal th
Riverside County Flood Control
Ft re Deparl~ent
Written evidence of cmpltance shall be presented to the Land Use Division
of the Department of Butldtng and Safety.
If signage is proposed, a separate plot plan accompanied by the
f in Ordinance No. 348 shall be submitted and
appropriate fees asset orth
approved by the Planning Department prior to sign installation.
t
substantial confommnce wrlth that shown on Exhibit M-2 ol ev ons)
and Exhibit M-1 (Materials Board).
PLOT PLAN NO. 11556
Condtttaes of Approval
Page 4
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shtelded frm ground view.
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Screening
A total of one trash enclosure ts adequate to enclose a total of two
btn(s) shall be evenly distributed throughout the project, and shall be
constructed prtor to the tssuance of occupancy pemtts, Each enclosure
shall be six feet tn hetght and shall be made wtth masonry block and a
gate whtch screens the btns frue external vtew,
Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a mtntmum hetght
of stx (6) feet at maturity,
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical
plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check
approval and shall cueply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan.
A total of one Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient
locations to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
Prior to issuance of building pemtts, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of planrings, walls and fences in accordance with the
approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall
be filed with the Director of Building and Safety.
Prtor to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable
to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and
free of weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation systm shall be properly
constructed and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical llnes rated 33kV or greater, shall be
Installed underground.
All planter tslands adjacent to end parktng spaces shall comply with
Ordinance 3¢8, Section 18.12. This will include planters cmstructed with
a minimum planting area width of five feet, excluding curbing and a one
foot concrete walkway along planters adjacent to parking spaces.
Prlor to the tssuance of Butldtng Permlts a Covenants, Codes and
Restrictions st.taint, describing reciprocal easements and access on the
PLOT PlAN NO. 11556
Can4111ms o~ Approval
Page 5
4 ·
5e
subject property, shall be approved by the Director of Planning and
legally recorded.
Prior to any use allowed by this Plot Plan, the applicant shall obtain
clearance frcm the Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section
that the uses found on the subject property are in conformance with
Ordinance No. 348.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be canplied with prior to occupancy
or any use all owed by this permit.
jHR:lt:sc
3/08/90
· OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER &COUNTY SURVEYOR
ROAD COMMI:S~ONER & C04.~'rf SUR~TYOR
March 12, 1990
COL~TY ADM~LSll~TP,1L CL~I!R
PO BOX t(~K]
IV~IRSIDE CAL]FOIL~LA 92502
{714) 275-6740
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE:
(Commercial Building)
Plot Plan 11556 - Amend #1
Team 5 - SMD 19
AP t111-111-111-9
* As amended at D.H. 3-12-90
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the traffic
study for the above referenced project. The traffic study has
been prepared in accordance with accepted traffic engineering
standards and practices, utilizing County approved guidelines. We
generally concur with the findings relative to traffic impacts.
The Road Department has reviewed the traffic study for this
project. The study indicates a projected Level of Service "C" at
Jefferson Avenue and Sanborn Avenue. The Comprehensive General
Plan circulation policies relative to Category II Land Uses
states: "A minimum of Level of Service "C" is necessary for any
new Category II land use." As such, the proposed project is
consistent with this General Plan policy. The following
conditions of approval incorporate mitigation measures identified
in the traffic study which are necessary to achieve or maintain
the required level of service:
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project
proponent shall provide a striping and signing plan for the
intersection at Jefferson Avenue and Buecking Drive, and
for the intersection at Jefferson Avenue and Sanborn
Avenue, to implement intersection approach lane geometrics
as follows: two northbound through lanes, one northbound
right turn lane, two southbound through lanes, one
southbound left turn lane, one westbound right turn lane,
and one westbound left turn lane at each intersection· Any
widening or other improvements necessary to implement such
plan, as approved by the Road Commissioner, shall be
constructed at no cost to any government agency.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the
Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge on Jefferson Avenue shall be
improved to its full ultimate section.
COUNTY ADMINISTIt&Trv'[ C[]NTER, 4OI0 LEMON STIELrT · ~E. CALIK]I,NIA
Plot Plan 11556 - Amend #1
-Fe~a~y-~-~99~--March 12, 1990
Page 2
*3.
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above
referenced item, the Road Department has the following
recommendat ions:
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this
permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at
no cost to any government agency:
No additional right of way shall be required on Madison
Avenue since adequate right of way exists.
Sufficient public street right of way shall be provided
along Buecking fUtile--to establish a 39-foot half width
right of way including standard corner cutback.
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed
by this permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Road Department the sum of $2,905.00
towards mitigating traffic impacts for signal require-
ments.
This amount represents 1.66 acres at $1,750.00 per gross
acre = $2,905.00.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the
applicant shall construct the following at no cost to any
government agency:
Madison Avenue shall be improved with concrete curb and
gutter located 38 feet from centerline and match up asphalt
concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing
paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 50
foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with
County Standard No. 101.
Buecking Drive shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 111.
(28'/39')
9, Asphalt emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
*As amended at D.H. 3-12-90
Plot. Plan 11556 - Amend #1
-~'rT-l-r-l~- March 12, 1990
Page 3
lOe
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
9.
0.
Standard 35 foot curb return, cross gutter, spandrel and
access ramps shall be constructed in accordance with
Ordinance 461 where applicable.
Six foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along
Madison Avenue and Buecking Drive in accordance with County
Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk).
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of
road improvements does not imply acceptance for main-
tenance by County.
Major drainage is involved on this project and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Commissioner.
Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section
11.1.
All work done within County right of way shall have an
encroachment permit.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside
County Standards and shall be shown on the street
improvement plans.
All entrance driveways shall be channelized with concrete
curb and gutter to prevent "back-on" parking and interior
drives from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum
distance of 35 feet measured from face of curb.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with PM 23561-1 and PP 11557.
Street lights shall be installed in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads
constructed or improved within the development. The County
Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the
development is within an existing assessment district. If
not, the land owner shall file after receiving tentative
approval, for an application with LAFCO for annexation into
or creation of a County Service Area in pursuant to
Governmental Code Section 56000 et. seq.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this project shall be coordinated with this
project and shown on the street improvement plans.
Plot Plan 11556 - Amend #1
T-e~-~-l-~- March 12, 1990
Page 4
21.
22.
A striping plan is required for Madison Avenue and Buecking
Drive. The removal of the existing striping shall be the
responsibility of applicant. Traffic signing and striping
shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs
borne by the applicant.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Road Department standards and require approval
by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape
plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet
format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted
with the street improvement plans and shall depict only
such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are
to be placed within the public road rights-of-way.
~erpeT~r~
Road Division Engineer
County of Riverside
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
TO:
A · oh iscow ~
RE: F~LT PlAN 11556, AT4TNDV. D NO. I
DATE:
January 10, 1990
T41=AI.T~ S'PI:i. CTAT.T~T TV
EnvSronmennal Health Services has. reviewed Amended No. 1 da=ed
January 10, 1990. Our current comments will remain as sta~ed in
our memo dated November i, 1989.
SM::ac
JAN 11 1990
RNERSDE COUNTY'
PLANNING DEPARI'~
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
lggS MARKET S'r'RtrET
I~.O. IQX 1033
TELEPHONE ('/14} '/8'/-20~5
FAX NO (714) 788-~,965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RI'VZlItSID E. CAUFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No.
Planner Jo4, CN,~
Area:
Re:
pP /,ss
We have reviewed this case and have the following conmnents:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, 'All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports.'
This project is in the
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~lesArea
and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existtng flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
i~lied density.
The Oistrtct's report dated/~v/f/fjf is still current for this project.
The Otstrict does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when t~rovements ~aveThb~e~r°ject will be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
OHN H. KASHUBA
r Civil Engineer
DATE:
County of Riverside
TO:
RE: Plot Plan 11556
Riverside County Plannin~ Dept.
IV
DATE:
November 1. 1989
riOy 3 1.g~ - ',
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan 11556 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and ware services are available in this area.
Prior to any building plan submittals, "will-serve" letters from the
water and sewering agencies will be required.
SM:cr
(;EN. FOR,M 4. IRev. ~'aT)
KENh~ETH L E. DWARDS
C~4m'F LrN~INIEM
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RB/EIq~IDE. CALIFORNIA e2502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. _~
Planner .7~n r'A,', J
Re:
/')p
We have reviewed.this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project ts in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable riles and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The Dtstrtct's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
free of ordinary storm flood o eeents have been constructed in
accordance with approvod plans.
The attache comments apply.
JOHN H. ICASHUBA
-G~ .~/f~'f ~//~ ~ea Drainage Plan for the pu~ose of
collecting drainage ~es. Those fees are used to constmct
needed flood control facilities within the particular area. The
Area Drainage Plan fees apply ~o new land divisions and other
t~es of new development.
Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff.
These increases are particularly troublesome in those watersheds
where an Area Drainage Plan has been adopted. In order to miti-
gate the downstream impacts brought about by increased runoff,
the DistriCt recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans
and Public Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation
charge. Mitigation charges, where appropriate, will be similar
to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate.
Following is the District's recommendation:
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall
equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied
by the area of new development. The new development in this
case includes a total of /./A acres. At the current
fee rate of $ /~ ~o per acre, the mitigation charge
equals $ ~gX ~o . The charge is
Control D~trict prior to issuance of payable to the Flood
permits. If the full
Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Mitigation Charge
(mitcharg)
ERSi
PLANNING it ENGINEERING
4~209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405
INDICX CA 9220X
(61~l 342~886
RIVERSIDE COb~NTY
HRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN }. NEWMAN
FIRE CHIEF
1-10-90
PLANNING it ENGINEERING
3760 IZTH STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
(714) 787-6606
ATTN:
RE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JOHN CHIU
PLOT PLAN 11556 AMENDED
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1750 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the Job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped
system (6"x4"x2tx2t), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than
165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved
vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from
any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
The required firs flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacin2, and, the system shall meet the fire flow
requirements. Plans shall be signed/approvad by a registered civil engineer
and the local water company with the followin2 certification: "I certify
that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements
prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department."
Subject: Plot Plan 11556 Page 2
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement
that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be
included on the title page of the building plans.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated
into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per
Section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code.
9. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered
must appear on the title page of the building plans.
10. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
11. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
12. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
13.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $345.00 to
the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
14.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25C per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
15. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions relardin2 the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND R. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
ma
Administrative Center, 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
January 16, 1990
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: John Chiu
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA g2501
RE: Plot Plan 11556, Exhibit A, Admended #1
JAN 18 1990
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site
signage will be required.
If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department
the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division
concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review.
If the proposed project is to be "phased," an approved exhibit
indicating which structures and on-site improvements are
required for each "phase" should be required.
Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B,
per Ordinance 655.
Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety
review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning
Department must be attached.
Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping
may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance
is required from the following:
* Temecula Unified School District
-Yours truly,
Land Use Technician
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
(PTANNING / J.C. )
WENDY NICHOL~ON
November 16, 1989 LDC
PLOT PLAN 11556 AMD #1
NIvc~,uc COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site.
The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends
approval of this project if the following conditions are included.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from
the Building and Safety Department.
Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance
security to be posted with the Building and Safety Department.
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information
from Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86,
and 284-46. Thank you.
' COUnC,u
' PLAnnirl0 DEPA CIiI !IC
July 2E, 1988
Schaefer Dixon Associates
2168 South Hathaway Street
Santa Anm, California 92705
Attention: Mr. Paul Davis
Mr. J~mes J. lleaver
SUBJECT:
Alqutst-Prtolo Special Studies Zone
Liquefaction Hazard
Job 80-245
Parcel Map No. 23561
County Geologic Report No. 516
Rancho California Area
Gen tl mean:
We have reviewed your report entitled "Geotechntcal Investigation, A Portion of
North Jefferson Business Park (Phase 4), P.N. No. 23561 (Formerly P.N.
19581-1), Rancho California, CA," dated June 1, 1988, and your revised report
dated July 12, 1988.
Your re;mrt determined that:
The faults encounte~d in trenches along the western part of the
property are considered to be tntra-Pauba (Pleistocene age)
displacements and are considered to be inactive, in accordance ~th
crttarta of the California State Division of Hines and Geology.
2. The lO0-yesr probable earthquake affecting the site resulting from an
event on the Whittter-Elstnore (Wtldomar) fault is expected to be 6.0
magnitude, with a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.35g.
The likelihood of liquefaction related ground movement during a
Ikgnltude 6.5 event ts considered to be lw. The liquefaction
potential is considered to be vet7 IN for site soils considering a
Magnitude 6.0 design earthquake.
The potential for seismic settlement and differential compactton is
considered veQr IN.
S. The potential for lendsliding $s considered to be ver~ remte.
4080 LEMON STREET, Q~' FLOOR
RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501
46-209 OASIS STkEET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
Schaefer Dixon Associates
- 2 - July 26, 1988
6. The potential for earthquake tnduced flooding, tsunamis and seiches ts
considered to be vet/1~.
The potential for sympathetic fault movement'on the zone of tnacttve
faults encountered tn the trenches, as a result of seismic event on the
nearby itldomar fault, ~s considered to be
8. The potent(a1 for lurching and lateral spreads tn the areas adjacent to
Santa Gertrudts Creek my extst at the southeasterly property boundary.
Your report recommended:
1. No setback zone for human occupancy structures is reconnended within
the boundaries of the subject property,
The potential for l~quefaction-reqated ground movement on the site
should be mitigated by the placement of engineered ftll withtn low
lying areas durtng site grading.
The potential for lurchtng and lateral spreads 4n areas adjacent to
Santa Gertrudts Creek should be mitigated by channel(zatton of the
stream and use of standard building setbacks.
e
The exploratory trench beckftll shouqd be considered durtng future site
development. The trench locations were determined by the project
engineer.
Zt ts our optnton that the report was prepared tn a competent mnner and
satisfies the requ~remnts of the Alqutst-Prtolo $pectel $tudqes Zone Act, the
associated Riverside County Ord, 547, end the additional information requested
under the California Environmental Quality Act revtew. Ftnal approval of the
report ts hereby gtven.
Me recomend that the follo~ng note be placed on the Ftnal Nap pr(or to 1Is
recordalton:
Schaefer Dixon Associates
- 3 - July 26, 1988
· County Geologic Report No. 516 was prepared for this property on July 12,
1988 by Schaefer Dixon Associates, and is on file at the Riverside County
Planning Department. The specific items of concern are inactive faults,
liquefaction, lateral spreads, and uncompacted trench backfill.
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SAK:rd
c.c. Bedford Properties - Applicant
Earl Hart - CDHG
Roy Shlemon & Assoc.
Norm Lostbom - Building & Safety
john Chtu - Team I
DATE: October 24, 1989
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety - Land Use
Building and Safety - Grading
Surveyor - Ken Teich
Road Department
Heal th - Pal ph Luchs
Fi re Protecti on
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S, Postal Service - RUth E. Davidson
U,S. Fish & Wildlife Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Eastern Huncipal Water District
Rancho California Water
Southern California Edison
Southern Caliofrnia Gas
Cal Trans 18
Temecula Union School District
Elsinore Union High School District
Con~issioner Turner
Conrnunity Plans
San Bernardino County Museum
UCR Archo Unit At~n:~Dan HcCathy
RiVERSiDE counc-,
PL nnin DEPi RC IEnC
NOV 15
roVeroDE COUNTY
I LANNI DEPARTMENT
PLOT PLAN 11556 - (Tm-5) - E.A. 34413 -
Brookstone Development - Rancho
California Area - First Supervisorial
District - SE corner of Bucking & Hadison
Ave. - H-SC Zone - 1.13 Acres - REQUEST:
Construct two commercial office buildings
- CONCURRENT: PP 11557 - Hod 119 - A.P.
910-200-093
Please review the case\ described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Committee meeting.has been tentatively scheduled for NoVember 16, 1989. If it
clears, it will then go to publ-ic hearing.
Your comments and recomend&t~Ons are requested pr. ior/to November 16, 1989 in order that
we may include them in the st~ff report for this particular case.
Should have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
John ~h~u at 787-1363. ·
Planner ·
COWqENTS: The pro3ect is lcr. at~ on the fossllferous Pauba Formation. Excavation will
impact nonrenewable paleontolo91c resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleoqtologlst to develop a program
to mitigate Impacts to paleontolo91c resources. This program should Include:
(1) monltorln9 of excavation by a qualified paleontologlc monitor; (2) preparation of
recovered specimens, lncludlncj sediment processln9 for small vertebrate fossils; (3)
curation of specirneqs Into an established reposlt y; end (4) a report of findings with
DATE: 11/1 ~)/RQ RE C4~ .
Dr. Allan D. Grlesefner, Museums DIrector
PLEASE print name and title
4080 LEMON STREET, 9'" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 187'6181
46'209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
'!
=UVE:L DE counff
-PLanninG DEP q'aninC
ENVIRONMENTAL ,I~SE~MENT FORM:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E,A,) NUMBER: .~t~/'~
PROJECT CASE ~d~(,)AND NUMBERS(N: PP I/.'~"~' ~
NAME OF PERSO~N
STANDARD EVALUATION
L PROJECT INFORIL4TION
A. DES4:~IPTION (inctu~e I~alw:l minimum lot
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES /, I ~
C. A,.qSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(e): '~/C) -
;orSQUAREFEET
09'3
D. EXGTING ZONING: /~, "' ~ C,- G THE PROPOGAL IN CONFORMANCE'~
F. STREET REFERENCES: ~' ~- C
G. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION N ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
I. COIIPREHENIN! O, INIRAL PLAN OFIN N AND CONIBWA11ON O!IIONATION
Check the mpmpdm cmem~8) belw end p,.QC,d amainrely.
./~ Mlr llrt oftm llmilGl lile il in"Arel NOt Dltled ll C)Pen i'- Comptete Sections lH. IV
(A. lencl Denly~Ven~VI.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RIIO URCII
A. i the nlture of the I;h'~p011 =1 ~ a Is .ill n "el Cl ~ the =1! ! :,fkotior,~ II k)un~ in Cc,,,f.-.i i '~l%~e Genei Ptln F~ure
~f~f;W d~:Nn:~8~eqc1~c~1~q~RN~ng~nd~ny~'~igv~Cnm~8~ze8t~8r~V~ NBo, whee indicated.
cWtiethe:~'l: c4x,kA lend use e-" ~,ltyornolee.m:ciy ~l:t) mlnO(m). (lee .l:lkaTQne"'e lxXlX, ollhlmlage).
t.~ ps u ~ (Fig. Vt.3)
I.~u,~k:tion PotsnUN Zone (Fig. ~.I)
NA S PS U R ffig. VI.4)
Grour~lN'mlUr,g Zone (F~g VI. 1 ) ,Z.o,v~* ~
NA S PS U R (Ir~g. VL5)
Slope (Riv. Co. 84X) ScIM Sk3pe Maps)
I. enclNi~e Risk Zene (Riv. C~ 800 ScNe
Seismic Mix o~ On-mte Intl~Ltion)
NA S PS U R (Fig. V1.6)
Rockfall Heard (On-Nte Ipel:.ction)
~ Soils (U.S.D.A. Soll
Emeion (U.S.D.A. Soll Connhstion
Service ~ Sum)
Wind Ersaeion & Bk:weancl (Fig. VI. 1,
Orgl. 4eO, Sec. 142 & Orcl. 484)
Dam Inurmeton Aree (Fig. V1.7)
NA U R (Fig. VIJ)
12, Jf~/AktxxtNoie(Fig. fi,18.5,11.18,11
&VI,12& 1984NC~IZRefxyt, Mjk. F.B.)
NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11 )
13. .,~Z RaWoed Nome(Ir:g. Vl.13-Vl.16)
NA A B C D (F~, V~.~
14. ,,~ HIg~wIy NNII(Ir:g. VI.17-VL29)
NA A B C D (F~,
15.,,~
NA A B C D (Fig, W.~I)
16. A'/P~ Gln8~ d gl Noise Affecting
17./~v/Noile Seaitive Uees(Fig. Vl.11)
__ NoieeSlnl~vePmiect(FigVl.11)
18.:~ NrQulityln1OectlFrom~t
19. Project~loNrQuaJ~
20. Water Quilt,/Imlacta From Proiect
21.j~ Pmlecl~loWBterQuality
22, HBzetlous Malmal$ and Wutes
24.
REBOURCF,.8
Inm'NelrBnAgdmdlMeNl%_sm'va 33~/_ HiBIm~~(Fig. VL32-VI.33)
Rv. Co./~dturN Lav:l Ce'~,,~. It~n 34~_. A~,~loglcad Reeeumes
31_.)Z,. EnBrgyReBourmeUrlg-VL43-Vl.44)
(F16. Vt,12-VL,13&VL46-VI.48)
~ Pl'tgnVoglcl'ReBoufca
3e,__
DefiNtions for Land Uee lultebety end NOIM AKeptebnlty ReUngs
NA - Not Arpfi:rNe 8 - Genmay 8,drone PS - I~,_.,eek:~ty Suit~e
U-Genereay~ R-Ikeelce. A-Genem. y~
1. OPIEN SPACE All:) C(:NISERVA) MAP DESK)NATIC)N(m):
a. ~J~N:IEA. FANY:
s. CONN~'aTY PLAN, ~ ~: ,~'m,, /A P
SUMMARY OF ~$ ?CTING ~
C,.,~,- ,.-.2 ,: <' ~, / , ~, ,~. ,+r. , ',,.
,.." r_ ,., r; / k/ <; ,v( ~ ,.. . : ~ y
Be
For NI project ink~) wffi'm · yll (Y) or no (N) whether Iny pubic tlctltll InCl/or ~ ~ Ny mgnific, m'ttly mft, ct
m N reflected by N pml~=mml. AM fmf.m mr~mcl ) m coniNnm~ In N C.,c-,(.,,.m~m~ Ginmini Plmn. F,m:w' tony m~
INBLIC FACILITIF~ AND IERVICF,~
1.~ Cir~(Fmg. N. 1-N.11.Dem
Sec. V Eximiing. I~ & IlmQuka,'m I~)
2 h/iTrmi~(F'mg.N. 12-W. 13)
~__ Wm~(Ag~cyLmtwN 1~-A/
4.~ ,~e,m'(Agency~) 1143~
F~~(Fig. N.16-N.18)
8heIR ~ (Fig N.11 · N.18)
I:(:F:iA.'-,~ Trill (F~. N.1 e - N24/
Riv. Cck 800 Sille F):l_b~ln Tril Iv~os)
Ullee (F'~ N25 - N26)
~ ~ N.1 ? · N. 18)
~ N (Fig. N.I? - N.18)
Aiqmele (Fig. IL18.2 - IL18.4,
IL1M - 1.18.10 1 N.27 - N38)
i~/8miqmdmm(Iqg. N.1T-N.18) ld DlmmmmP~,lar,_:fmmm
8CIdM(lq;N.17-N.18) 11/6~ ClV~e'iR, m~m '~'~-'~'~"
e-N INe~indPll._/k:~,(FIg. N. le-N.20) ~
C. III0rplftoehllfoilctllllx:lMIn'AItOPl~MlmllN','FilMAr0r:~."Y.J~i~unitYPol~Y
enm:i.ll~m:,mk.,co-wVentwlthlteC~,,m,,,/tenmkmGeneralPlen? IlnoLmm~min: 7~' c:
N. LAND USE DE'I'ERSB~I'ION (oommued)
D. ~f~r~:~rt~e~:~M~it~isin~`Ar~r1~D~ign~d~DenS~eCe~42i~n~x~)~~~te
cF_mADns 1, 2, 3, ~ srgt 7. ~ ~_~ticns 4, 5, 6 snd 7 I~ It is in · Cemmun~ I:qsn.
Land usa ~ies) nsnwlm,y to mmlxrt the prc;c:nd ~ AJmo irx:lic:me tBncl use
ass
3. I D.1 dikn from D.2, wel the (Ibrmol be ,Aot4d 81 Ihe glm~lli212.,,l'~t line? Expk~:
4. C4~nm~i~ Plsn dssigns~s):
5. IstheproposedproisctconsSSentwtththep:d~S, sss'~deSgnstmso~theCommuneYPtan?
ff nee., expSm:
6. II the ;Sl~X~II ccs~}ltil~e ~ x,~./.~g and pe~pallcl ~ lind i,mel?
If not, explsin: ~
7. Based on this k, dtisl study, is the try;alea cxxail~ with the ComCssdsrsive General Plan?
I ~ ,.alika~S by 8eclkmand lesue Numlxrlhom imum:derdaYk~g ltcm eMmcm:
F,,, I II or pit ol lie plOilcl Ill il in In Of}in 81lOl I'ld C, Gi-iI~.YI~A ~ Ors,~,lYkll the lollowing:
~, is fie rat;uv' omenlent wet fie dmdgnellon(s)? Ift ssWslsdn:
3. BeNd on Ida ifdial nay, ie la ~l}c:tu' oxtmltnt with the Cc.,(xst'a~bBive General Plan?
I noL ,.~It;s~m by Sec:lion end iesue llaeer toee iemas ~,rdb'yk'sg kw-s~ilmc:ss:
V. INFORMATION IOURGEt FINDINg8 OF FACT AND UfflGATION UEAIURE8
A. ADOmONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL AS._~SSI, ENT CAN BE COMPLETED.
DATE
SEC~ON/ N~FORMAT1ON IFORMAllON
ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQ(JEST'cD
~m:~- , '7'~,,-~, ~- ~-,:-7 t ~ - , ~ - ~
DATE ADEQUACY
ItORMATION OLrrel~.n~
RECEIVED ('rr. Sq~.DATE,
B. For mmch ~ mm'km:l m ('Y) uriclet ,Secto~ IILB mncl N J, k:lentify the Section mncl ~ number mncl do me
t~ll~.ing, in the forram u Crown laeow:
4. If ~jclitionm idormmtion i re{luirmcl belom the ~nvironrnlntl Ilm~nent mn be completed, refer to
· ~jt ,ction A.
5. If Kltttior~l sheets are needed to c~mplete thil I/ctlon, chick the Mx mt the mxl of the section and attach
8OURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
d~-~-~ _~-~, ,'~ tc~,~,-,~ ,~ ~ zo~~. ~' ~,-~:L', ~ /~,.%.~,,.~.
~,, (;co,,O,,,' l,~.'n',~ ~.~J...~ ?-,~-~ "~.,
v
V. INFORMATION lOUIsICES, FINDIIGI OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES ({x;mttnue<l)
~C"IION/
IBSlJENO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
d
841 :lrlCh!:l
[::] The I:m:aiect tidl not have · 8igMicant dlect on the .sn~x.,~ant end · Negdve ~ may be
liraaNne.
/2~Thl ~ cllulll hive · ~ IIIcl Qn the rt.i¢/.,,i. 4, M,/.414r, ~ will not be · li~ificlnt
elect In I~ em~ I~set~,ls Ilw ~ memeumm ¢leecet~l In 8ei~m V teve I}en m¢~li~l to the
Ray have etlect on N .sr~vW~r,,,~ent end on En,kur,,.ental ImCect Report
il .... ::, ~. '
ITEM
NO.
11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 9, 1990
Employees Holiday Party
PREPARED BY: Deputy City Clerk June Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Allocate the sum of $2,350 to cover the costs of the first
annual City Employees Holiday Party.
BACKGROUND: The City Employees Holiday Party Committee has finalized
arrangements for this event. The dinner will be held on Saturday, December 15, 1990
at the Temecula Creek Inn. Cocktails will begin at 6:30 PM, dinner at 7:00 PM with
dancing until midnight.
The City will cover the costs associated with the dinner, gratuity, tax, and music for
dancing. There will be a no-host bar and the employees will cover the cost of their
spouse or invited guest.
FISCAL IMPACT: $2,350 which will be allocated from the individual
department's current budgets.
ITEM NO.
12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 9, 1990
Cancellation of meeting of October 23, 1990
PREPARED BY: Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the cancellation of the Regular City Council meeting
of October 23, 1990.
BACKGROUND: The League of California Cities 92nd Annual Conference is
scheduled for October 21 24, 1990. Four members of the City Council have
indicated they will be attending this conference, therefore, a quorum will not be
available on October 23, 1990.
ITEM NO. 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Engineering Department
September 25, 1990
Final Parcel Map No. 21383
PREPARED BY:
Robert Righetti
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 21383,
the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, and the
Special Facilities Agreement, subject to the Conditions of
Approval, and the conditions as put forth in Development
Agreement No. 1.
DISCUSSION:
Parcel Map No. 21383 was originally submitted to Riverside
County Planning Department on January 9, 1986. The
Tentative Parcel Map was approved by the Board of
Supervisors March 24, 1987. A first extension of time was
granted by Riverside County Planning Commission on
October 24, 1989. A second extension of time, with
amended Conditions of Approval, was granted by City
Council on July 10, 1990. City Council also approved
Development Agreement No. 90-1 on August 28, 1990.
This project contains 130 industrial lots on 164 gross acres. The property is located
at the northwest corner of the intersection of Winchester and Diaz Roads. The
developer is Rancho Core Associates No. 1. This property is included within the
boundary of Assessment District 155, which provides for improvements to Winchester
Bridge crossing Murrieta Creek.
The following fees are required for the development of this project:
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee: (Deferred)
Area Drainage Fees: (Deferred, fee not
determined at this time, fee paid will be
scheduled in effect at time permits are issued. )
$ 287,000
STAFF R PT\PM21383 1
The following bonds have been posted for this project:
Faithful
Performance
Labor and
Materials
Streets $1,957,000 $978,500
Drainage 1,780,000 890,000
Sewer 499,000 249,500
Water 580,000 290,000
Survey Monuments $ 40,000
Traffic Signal 287,000
Taxes 156,000
Gradin9 694,000
The final drafts of both the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions, as well as the
Special Drainage Facilities A9reement are bein9 reviewed for final form by the City
Attorney and were not available for inclusion in this report.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not determined.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council Approve Parcel Map No.
21383, the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions as finally
approved to form by the City Attorney, as well as the Special
Drainage Facilities Agreement as finally approved to form by the
City Attorney, subject to the Conditions of Approval and the
conditions put forth in Development Agreement No. 1.
RR:ks
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Fees & Securities Report
3. Copy of Map
4. Location Map
STAFFR PT\PM21383 2
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
lj$llJ~r~l,q, PARCEL MAP MO. 21383 AM:). #3
Date: Fgu~ 24, 1987
Expires: rg~CH 24, 1989
STAMDARD COMDITIONS
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Nap Act and to all the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative mp will expire twa year's after the
Board of Supervisors approved date, unless extended as provided by
Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Nap Ace and
Riverside County Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Surveyor's
Office and t~o coptes to the Department of Butldtng and Safety. The
report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the
site·
If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The
plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additional ly provided for in these
conditions of approval.
A grading perTnit shall be obtained from the Depar)ent of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way. If grading is proposed on slopes of 10% or greater,
and environmental assessment approval will be required from the Planning
Department prior to an acceptance of the plans by the Building Department.
One mylar copy of the approved grading plan shall be submitted to the
Department of Building and Safety for transmittel to the Road Department.
7. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordatton of the
final map.
The subdivider shall comply wtth the street improvement recomendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 3-24-87 ,
a copy of which is attached·
9. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
INDUSTRIAL PARCEL RAP NO. 21383 Amd. t3 '*
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
10. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until .the governing body accepts of abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Co~m~issioner.
11. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilites,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final rap if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
12. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter dated 5-15-86 & 1-21-86, a copy of which is attahced.
13. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverisde County Control District's letter dated 5-21-86,
a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted
flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be
collected by the Road Connissioner.
14. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improverants recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 5-15-86, a copy of
which is attached.
15. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed conwnon open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
16. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
a. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section
3.8C of Ordinance 460.
b. Lots created by thts subdivision shall be in confonnance with the
development standards of the M-SC zone.
c. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
17. Prior to RE(X)RDATION of the final rap the following conditions shall be
satisfied.
IMDUSTRZA~ PARCEL MAP NO. ZZ383 Aad. #3
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
et
Prior to recordatton of the final map the applicant shall submit written
clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that al 1
pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from
the following agencies have been met.
County Fire Department
County Flood Control
County Heal th Department
County Planning Department
The land-divider shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of
other parties as approved by the Planning Director
PwieP le weee~dat4em e( ike (4am1 map eke mubd4videw skall eNvide a
have ~m ~t, m ee~ e( ~4eh is mktmeked, ~leted ~r Planning
Comission January 21, 1987.
PwieP te eeeePdat4ee e~ the i4nal map the sebd4v4dew ski;; pwevtde
WWtitet StdlteeeMt ~4mem the BelkiwLmeMt e~ 8.4~d4ng and Safe~y that
weeemee.damteRs dated g-4-86 kava bee, mah a eepy e( w4MiBh tS attached,
Deleted per Planning Commission January 21, 1987.
e. Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following:
Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plants
with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of
the proposed street light layout first from the Road DeparVnent's
traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor.
Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road
Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an
application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting
district, or annexation to a existing lighting district, unless
the site is within an existing lighting district.
Prior to retardation of the final mp, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street lighting application from
LAFCO, unless the site is within mn existing lighting district.
Prior to recordatton of the final map, an Environmental Constraints
Sheet (ECS) shall he prepared in conjunction with the final map to
deltneate Identified envtrormnental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall
be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The
approved ECS shall be fanwarded with copies of the recorded final map
to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety.
INDUSTRIAL PARCE~ NAP I0. 21383 Amd. t3
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
18.
The following note shall be placed on the Envtromnental Constraints
Sheet: 'A Geologic Report was prepared for this property by Leighton
and Associates on June 23, 1986, and is on file at the Riverside County
Planning Department. Specific items of concern in the report are as
fol lows: Lt cluefaction."
The following note shall be placed on the Enviromnental Constraint
Sheet: 'County Archaeological Report No. 1125 was prepared for this
property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Departaent.
Prior to the issuance of GIADING PI)ITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline
for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of
development and shall include the following:
1. Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process·
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of
January through March.
3. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
4. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent
grade·
Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combination there
of, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an
appropriate combination of a special terracing (benching) plan,
increase slope ratio (i.e., 3:1) retaining ~mlls, end/or slope planting
combtned with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen
percent grade·
All cut slopes located adjacent to undergraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded
incorporating the following grading techniques:
1. The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terrain·
INDUSTRIAL PARftL MAP NO.
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
21383, Amd. #3
19.
2. Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proporotion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rouncling.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied.
a. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
with the stana~ds of Ordinance 460·
12/23/86
20.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permits, the applicant shall ccmply
with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee
set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of
the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee
required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implerented by County
ordinance or resolution. (Added per Planning. C~:,~dssion on 3-29-90).
/bc
3/12/90
fill I IINIH
. _..',' · .. ', ..,; ,,/_, i
I{ I V F, IL~II )1! (T()tJN' i'Y
FI!{I! DF, I'AIUI'M F,N'I'
IN COOPEFIATION WITH TIlE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORES1RY
RAY IIEBRAP, D
FIRE C!IIF, F
05-15-86
To:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Attn: Team II
Re:
PH 21383 - Amendment#3
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommeOds the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
COHHERCIAL FlEE PROTECTION
The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 4000 GPH
and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 2000 GPH for
2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure.
Approved super fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2t"x2{") shall be located at each street
intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with
no portiou of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one (1) copy of the water system plans
to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types,
location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements.
Plans sitall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local
water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design
of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by
the Riverside County Fire Department."
All questions regarding the msantng of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering section.
MICHAEL E. GRAY
Planning Officer
cdt
Planning Department
PARCEL ~i~P NO. 21383
January. 21, 1986
This Department has a statement from the Rancho California Water District agreein~
to allow the sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the district. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved
by the district, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints
of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with
the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal
pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint
specifications, and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and
water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans
shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the
following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in
Parcel ~p No. 21383 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the
Rancho California Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate
at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract."
The plans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review at least
t~'o weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map.
It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the
recordation of the final map.
It will be necessaD~ for the annexation proceedings to be completely finalized
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Sincerely,
H. Ralph Luchs, R. 5.
Administrative Supervisor
HRL:cg
OCJNTy O1= I:IIVEI=ISIO E- DEPARTMENT OF
35 S 5TWt, f[41, (ilOS, 0 CI IOX ~370) IllV[Jq'$;O(, CA 1'1502
HEALTH
Eawa',': . Ga/;'e v: '~'" 'I i
January 21, 1986
Riverside County Planning Depar~nent
4080 Lemon St.
Riverside, C~ 92501
Team 2
RIVERb:uI: uuuNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PARCEL MAP NO. 21383; Parcel 4, ~ 4646, PM 6/75, Riverside County Records.
(132 Parcels)
Gentlemen:
The Depar~nent of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 21383 and recommends
that:
A water system shall be installed accordinE to plans and snecifications
as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate,
with a minimum scale not less than one inch eouals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing, to the Count>' Surveyor. The prints shall show the
internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pioe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main at the iunction of the ne~
system to the existing system. The plans shall com, ly in all resnects
with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code,
California Administrative, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103
of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when aODlicable.
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company ~<ith
the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water
system in Parcel Map No. 21383 is in accordance with the water system
expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the
water sem'ice, storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide
water sen~ice to such tract. This certification does not constitute a
guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific ouantities,
flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose." This
certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water comany.
The olans must be submitted to the County Survevor's Office to review at
least two weeks prior to the reQ~eYt for' the r~cor~ation of the final map.
This Department has a statement from ~he Rancho California Water District agreein~
~o serve domestic water ~o each and every, parcel on demand providinR satisfacton'
financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessa~'
for the financial arrangements to be made prior ~o the recordation of the final maD.
~,~oy o. smoot
lOAD COMMa$$1ONII & COUNTY
OFFICE OF ROAD COM,MIS$10.%'ER ~ COC'~TY 5LRVEYOR
March 24, 1987
Ilhv llll;OI. C&~,t lOiir41& IllO~l
VII,,IIINONI tTlll ?l?-tll4
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: Parcel Map 21383 - Amend #3
Schedule E - Team 2
As Amended at Planninq Commission 1-21-B7
· As Amended at Board 3-24-R7
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landaivider provi:e the
following street improvements and/or rOaa dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and ~iverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance ~61).
It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows all existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, an: that their
omission may require the map to be resubmitted for =.rther consideration. These
Ordinances and the following conditions are essentia' parts an: a requirerent
occurring in O~;E is as binding as t~ough occurring '- all. They are intencec t~
~e co-Dlementary and to Qescri~e the cOnditiOnS for ~ complete ~es~gn of the
inprovenent. All QueStions regarding the true me~.'ing of the conoitionS shall
~e referre~ to the Roao C:nnissioner's Office·
The lanC~ivi~er Shall protect ~ownStream pr:perties fr~n carafes
cadse~ by alteration of the ~raina~e patterns, i.e., c~ncentra-
tion o~ Civetsion of flow. Protection shall :e ~r~vi:e~ :y
c:~StruCting aCeouate drainage facilities incl~c~ ~nlar~r~
e~iSt~ng facilities or by Securing a Graina~e easerent sr :y
t~tn. ~ll drainage easements shall be sno~n on the final ~a~
and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no ~uilding,
obstructions, or encroachmerits by lan~ fills are alloweo" The
protection s~all be as approved by the Roao ~e~art~ent.
The landdivider shall accept and properly ais~:se of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the Site. In the event the
Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for orainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance 21o. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity Or the use of streets be prohibitea for orainage
purposes, the sub:ivider shall provide adequate trainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Parcel Map 21383 - Amend #3
Schedule E - Team 2
-Newe~Vee~-Hr-~ january 21, 1987
Page 2
As Ame d d At Planning Commission'l-21-87
ne
As Amended at Board 3-24-87
*4.
** 7.
11.
Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
Diaz Road & Winchester Road shall be improved within the de~icate~
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 101, t~f~<H~
76'/100').
"A" Street shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 102, (32'/44').
Streets "B", "C", "E", "F" and "G" shall be improved within the
dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standar: rio.
Section A. (56'/78').
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk)
or as approved by the Road Commissioner.
Primary and secondary access roads to the nearest paved roa~
maintained by the County shall be constructed within the ;uDliC
right Of way in accordance with County Standard I~o. 106, Section
B, (32'/60'} at a grade and alignment
Commissioner. This is necessary for c'~:ulation purposes.
PriOr tO t~e recordation of the final -a;, the developer shall
Ceoosit with t,e ~iverside County Road ]~partment, a cash sum of
S1,750.00 per gross acre as mitigation for traffic signal i~pacts.
Should the ~eveloper choose to oefer the ti~e of payment, ne ,ay
enter into a v~ritten agreement ~vitn the Cc~nty ~eferr~ san~
~ay-ent to t~e time of issuance of a ~u~Icirg
[-:r~vement plans shall ~e baseO upon a cen:er!ine :r~f~le
e~:enoing a minimum of
a ;ra~e and alignment as approved by the ~ivers~ce C~unty
Commissioner. Completion of road improvements ~oes not i~ply
acceptance for maintenance by County.
Electrical an~ co~munications trenches shall ~e prOvi:eO in
aCCOrdanCe with OrOinance 461, Standard 817.
*~eleted at Planning Commission 1-21-87
t, As Amended at Board 3-24-R7
Parcel Map 21383 - Amend
Schedule E - Team 2
Ne~ember-ig~-~986 J,~n~"t~-~-l-r-X-~B~March 24, 1987
Page 3
As Amended At Planning Cormmission 1-21-B7
As Amended At Board 3-24-87
12.
13.
14.
15.
!6.
17.
21.
Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard.
Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall be
constructed thrOughOut the land:ivision.
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Dia~ Road and so noted on the
final map with the exception of one 40' opening between parcels
21 and 22 and one 40' opening between parcels 23 and 24.
LanddivisiOnS creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall provide erosion control, Sight distance and slope easements
as approved by the Road Department.
The lan~divider shall provide utility :'earante from Ranc~o Salif.
~ater Sistrict prior to the recQr:atic- }f the final tap.
The ~inimum centerline radii shall ~e ~' or as approve~ ~y t~e
Rcad ~e~artment.
St~eet trees shall be planted in COn~Or-arC~ .itn t'e :r:visi:nS
of zrticle 12a ~f Or~inance ~60.53 and their l~catiDn~s, s'a~ :e
s~awn ~n street irprOve~ent ;lans.
zll ~veways shall confor-.. to the applicable ~ive~s~:e Zc~nty
Standards an~ shall be shown on the street ~=~r:ve~ent plans.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90~ ,vitn a minirum
feet of tangent ~eyonc) the flow line as a:~r~ve~ Dy t~e ~a~
Co~mi s s i one r.
Parcel Map 21383 - Amenc~ #3
Schedule E - Team 2
,~eremt:er-)g;-)9~)6 Jen~<-y~l-r-~g8~ March 24, 1987
Page 4
As Amended At Planning Con~nission 1-21-87
A& Amended at Board 3-24-87
22. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall
be coordinated with PM 19582, PM 21029, PM 21382, MB 122/42-43.
23.
Prior to the recordatton of the final map, the significant issues
involving fee contributions for the Winchester Road Bridge
crossing the P~rrieta Creek along with signal locations at the
intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street shall be
resolved.
24. Lot access shall be restricted on Winchester Road and Street "A"
for a distance of 200' measured from the centerline of Diaz Roacs
and so noted on the final map.
GH:lh
Very truly yours,
Gus Hughes
Roaa Division Engineer
KENNETH L.. EDWAII~DS
ON[Elr ENGINEIrA
IIIIB MARKZ-r ITI~EET
P. O. BOX 1033
TeLwIeHO~!: (714) 717-:'015
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
W, Ivllll l)Ir. CALIFOIqNIA IIlOl
May 21, 1986
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. 2
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 3)
The District's report on tentative Parcel Map 21383 dated March
20, 1986 is still current for the above land division.
Very truly yours,
KENKETH L. EDWARDS
C'ni~ f~x~'Lne~
OHN H. ~ASHUBA
~enior Civil Engineer
co:
Road Dept.
Dept. of Building
& Safety
Attn: Eric Traboulay
MC:pml
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
CHIEF ENGINEER
!lIE MARKET ITREET
P. C. IIOX 1033
TE.L. EI"NONE (714)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERIIDE, CAI, IFORNIA I2SO2
March 20, 1986
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
MAR g 8 1986
RIV=n~,,' ,.,,.,u,~l'Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Attention: Regional Team No. 2
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 2)
Parcel Map 21383 is a proposal to subdivide approximately 164
acres in the Temecula area. The property is located southwest of
Diaz Road, westerly of Rancho California Airport.
The northeasterly portion of this property is located within the
Murrieta Creek 100 year flood plain. Finished floors of all
buildings must be elevated above expected flooding levels.
The property is subject to offsite storm flows aTong its
southwest boundary. These flows should be collected and conveyed
to an adequate outlet.
The District is concerned about development occurring in the
Murrieta Creek watershed. The cumulative effect of development
will cause increased storm runoff and, without adequate drainage
facilities in the area, will have a significant adverse impact on
downstream properties. A practical and equitable mitigating
measure for such an impact is the adoption and implementation of
an Area Drainage Plan. Adoption of the Murrieta Area Drainage
Plan, however, is not expected until the Spring of 1986. Rather
than await formal adoption of the Murrieta Area Drainage Plan,
the developer has requested that a condition of approval be added
requiring a drainage mitigation payment prior to construction.
Following are the District's recommendations:
In accordance with the written request of the applicant
to the County of Riverside, dated January 31, 1986, the
final map shall not be recorded until the applicant, his
successors or assigns, has executed a Special Drainage
Facilities Agreement with the County. Grading and
building permits shall not be issued for Parcel Map 21383
or any unit thereof until the developer has provided
evidence of compliance with the terms of the Agreement.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 2)
-2-
March 20, 1986
10.
The property should be graded so that all building sites
will be free from flooding from Murrieta Creek during a
100 year storm.
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facili-
ties.
Development of this property should be coordinated with
the development of adjacent properties to ensure that
watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from one watershed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or off-
site construction and grading.
Drainage facilities located outside of road right of way
should be contained within drainage easements shown on
the final map. A note should be added to the final map
stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free of build-
ings and obstructions."
All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained
within the street right of way. When either of these
criteria are exceeded, additional drainage facilities
should be installed.
Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be
designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows.
Additional emergency escape should also be provided.
The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area
and outlet points.
A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of
the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the
District for review prior to the recordation of the final
map.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 2)
-3-
March 20, 1986
ll.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District for review
prior to recordation of the final map.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
Chief Engineer
DAVID T. SHELDON
Chief of Planning Division
co:
Road Dept.
Dept. of Building
& Safety
Attn: Eric Traboulay
Neste, Brudin and Stone
MC:pml
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
HTG:
DEPT:
TITLE:
CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR T.P.M. 21383
DEPT HD
CiTY ATTY
CiTY HGR
Development Agreement MUST BE APPROVED by the City PRIOR TO
RECORDATION of the final map incorporating all of the following
standards:
ae
The road right of way for Via Industria would be changed to 88 feet
creating a "Western Corridor". Lot access for lots fronting Via
Industria will continue to be available from Via Industria.
The Right of Way for Via Industria would be increased to 88 feet
within PM 21382. (already recorded and partially constructed
adjacent parcel to South).
Lot lines would be adjusted for the dedication of an 88 feet road
Right of Way in the vicinity of lots 73 ~, 74 to extend Via Industria
the "Western Corridor" toward the north.
Provide Bedford Properties lot 15 in PM 21382 for use as a road to
complete the southern connection to the "Western Corridor".
No building permits for lots q6 through 75 will be issued until the
revised road drawings are approved and dedication made for action
development item it1. #2. and #3 above·
Lots 68 through 73 will be dedicated as open space to minimize slope
grading and preservation of chaparral in this area. There may be
grading on those lots to accommodate road grading for Via
Industria. Any grading on lots 68 thru 73 shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Director.
In addition to the Flood Control Murrieta Creek Channel landscaping
to the east of Diaz Road of approximately five acres, three acres in
the vicinity of lots 12, 95, and 119 shall be maintained as a park by
the owner's association. Lot lines would be adjusted to create a 150
foot wide linear parkway.
Landscaping of slopes on lots 59 through 73 would be installed
immediately upon water availability and completion of slope grading
to these lots.
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP / TRACT NO. 21383
DATE 10/1/90
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
Streets ~na Dr. ln~ze m 3,737,000
W~ter m 580,000
~qewer m 499,000
TOTAT, $ 4,816,000
1,868,500
290,000
249,500
2,407,000
$ 480,000
40,000
$
$ 315.040
$ 16,760
$ 298,280
$ -Q-
$ -Q-
$ 298,280
$ N0I DETERMINED
$ 287 000
$
,Maintenance Retention (10% for one year)
,(or Bonds if work is completed)
Monument Security
Inspection Fee: (Offsite Improvements)
Fee paid to date (Credit)
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
Total Inspection Fees Due
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD ~
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
**** Pr~SEREAD INSTRUCTIONS BELOW****
Securities in the amount of $4,000 or less for improvements and
$2,500 or less for payment of taxes must be cashiers check or Money
Order.
Fill in name at the top of the agreement and complete the last
paragraph of each agreement with the name and address of developer
under "Contractor". Pr.wASE DO NOT DATE AC~RR~FES.
All securities must Me either bonds, instruments of credit, letters
of credit or cashier°s check·
All bonds, instruments of credit, and letters of credit must be on
City Forms. DO NOT RE-TYPE ~ORMS. I~-~orms are duplicated, they
must be printed on both sides. .-'
All signatures must be notarized on white copy of agreements a/Td on
all securities.
Submit evidence of authority to sign.
Unit prices are updated periodically· Bond estimates are subject to
change.
Please fill out additional sheet with names and personal residence
addresses for each person signing agreements and securities.
Do not use Carbon paper on white copy. IT IS THEORIGINAL!
xr, o
-r
rq
,~UTO
CENTEl
Coun~
~ m Crr
'~Jrc~T -/
ITEM NO.
14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
October 9, 1990
Appeal No. 8,
Conditional Use Permit No. 1
PREPARED BY:
Mark Rhoades
R ECOMMEN DAT I ON:
Staff recommends that City Council uphold the Planning
Commission's Denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 1.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
James L. Ramsay
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
McGoldrick Engineers
Conditional Use Permit for an automobile sales lot
and 528 square foot office.
West side of Jefferson Avenue between Winchester
Road and Overland Drive.
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
C-P-S
Scenic Highway Commercial )
North: C-P-S
South: M-M
East: 1-15
West: C-1/CP
Scenic Highway Commercial
Manufacturing - Medium
General Commercial
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not applicable.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Carpet Sales Shop
Barn
1-15
Burger King, Commercial Center
STAFFRPT\APP8 1
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
FINDINGS
No. of Acres:
Building Size:
Required Parking:
Provided Parking:
1.67 acres
528 sq.ft.
20 spaces
22 spaces
On September 10, 1990, the Planning Commission
denied CUP No. 1 by a vote of 3-2 based on design
and the project's proximity to 1-15. The Commission
recommended that the applicant design a structure
which was more permanent as apposed to the
proposed nodular office unit. The Planning
Commission also commented on the landscaping,
especially as viewed from the freeway, and felt that
the landscape design was unacceptable.
The motion of denial was accompanied by language
pertaining to building permanence and landscape
design, both in relation to freeway proximity.
The Commission denied Conditional Use Permit No.
1 based on the following findings:
Site Approval
Although the site of the proposed use is
suitable in size to accommodate the proposed
intensity of development, the proposed site
design and improvements are not appropriate
for the subject site, due to its proximity to
Interstate 15.
The proposed modular building is not of an
appropriate scale relative to the lot size and
configuration as conditioned to be compatible
with adjacent project·
The proposed use may have a substantial
adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. The use will not
generate excessive noise, vibration, traffic
or other disturbances.
Landscaping does not provide adequate
freeway buffering in accordance with the
SWAP guidelines·
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
MR:ks
Staff recommends that the City Council UPHOLD the
Planning Commission's DENIAL of Conditional Use
Permit No. 1.
STAFFRPT\APP8 2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTF~BER 10, ]990
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ]
4.1 Proposed C.U.P for an automobile sales lot and 528 souare
feet of off)ce space.
OI, IVER MUJICA presented the staff report on this item.
He stated that the office building is a modular unit
on a permanent foundation and the applicant proposes
to provide a tile roof and stucco walls. He also advised
the Commission that the C.U.P. was beang cond~tioned to
come back to the Commission every two years, at a maximum
of ten years, for rev)ew of C.U.P renewal. In addition,
service of vehicles will not be permitted on this site as
part of the approval.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY expressed concern for the attention
to the designated scenic highway along this project and
how staff was addressina the view from the highway.
MR. MUJICA stated that the improvements to the modular
unit were what they had worked out with the applicant.
COMMISSIONER BOAGLAND questioned the reference to
recreational vehicles throughout the staff reDoft.
GARY THORNHILL advised the Con~nission to disregard
the reference.
COMMISSIONER FORD stated that since the applicant was
providing a minimum of 22 parking spaces, Condition
of Approval No. 5 should reflect a minimum of 22 parking
spaces rather than 20 parking spaces as it reads.
HIM. 9/10/90 -4- September 12, 1990
PLANNING CC)/4MISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 10, 1990
JIM RAMSAY, applicant, advised the Commission that the
site would be the location of a Myundai dealership and
that they would be arranging for service at another
location.
COMMISSIONER HOAGI.AND Questioned the two year review of
the C.U.P and asked if the Con~nission could revoke the
C.U.P at any time.
LOIS BOBACK from the City Attorney's office stated that
every C.U.P is subject to revocation and that possibly the
C.U.P could be written with a two year renewal and a
maximum of five renewals.
JOHN MIDDI,ETON stated staff's concurrence to this revision
of the C.U.P.
COM~4ISSIONER BLAIR moved to deny the issuance of
Conditional Use Permit No. 1, and design a more permanent
development for this location due to the proximity with
regard to the scenic hlQhway frontage, seconded by
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND. COMMISSIONER FAI~EY stated that
she would like the landscape design addressed as well.
AYES: 3
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Hoagland,
Chin~aeff
NOES: 2 CO)4]~ISSIONERS: Fahey, Ford
MXN.9/IO/gO
-5-
September 12, 1990
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 10, 1990
Case No.: Conditional Use Permit No.
Recommendation: Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
James L. Ramsay
McGoldrick Engineers
Conditional Use Permit for an automobile sales lot
and 528 square foot office.
West side of Jefferson Avenue between Winchester
Road and Overland Drive.
C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial)
North: C-P-S
South: M-M
East: 1-15
West: C - 1 / CP
Scenic Highway Commercial
Manufacturing - Medium
General Commercial
Not applicable.
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Carpet Sales Shop
Barn
1-15
Burger King, Commercial Center
No. of Acres:
Building Size:
Required Parking:
Provided Parking:
1.67 acres
528 sq.ft.
20 spaces
22 spaces
This lot is a portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 22886.
The application for the Conditional Use Permit was
filed with this department in April of this year.
The project went to Preliminary Development Review
on May 17, 1990. Corrections were made to the
proposal and the item received a final DRC meeting
STAFFRPT\CUP1 1
ANALYSIS:
ZONING AND SWAP
CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
on August 2, 1990.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is to allow
vehicle sales in conjunction with a 528 square foot
office on a portion of a 1.67 acre parcet.
Parking for the proposed project exceeds code
standards under Section 18.12.b(42). Under this
section, the project would require twenty spaces.
Twenty-two spaces are provided. The project
landscaping meets the requirement of the ordinance.
The only exception is that where painted pavement
is proposed, landscape planters shall be
constructed.
The proposed office building is a manufactured
structure. The structure will be placed on a
permanent foundation instead of piers. Stucco and
a clay tile roof will also be added to the building to
help it blend with surrounding architecture. This
permit will be subject to Commission review every
two ~ 2 ) years.
The project as conditioned is consistent with the
current zoning of C-P-S. The project is also
consistent with the Commercial SWAP designation.
A preliminary environmental assessment was
conducted by the Planning Department Staff.
Potential environmental impacts have been mitigated
in the Environmental Assessment and Conditions of
Approval. A Negative Declaration is recommended
for adoption.
Site Approval
The site of the proposed use is suitable in
size to accommodate the proposed intensity of
development.
The building is of an appropriate scale
relative to the lot size and configuration as
conditioned to be compatible with adjacent
project.
The proposed use will not have a substantial
adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. The use will not
generate excessive noise, vibration, traffic
or other disturbances.
STAFFRPT\CUP1 2
10.
The site for the proposed use has adequate
aCCeSS.
The proposed project will not inhibit or
restrict future ability to use active or passive
solar energy systems.
The project will not have a significant
adverse effect on the environment.
There is a reasonable probability that the
project will be consistent with the General
Plan once it is adopted, based on analysis in
the staff report.
There is a probability that the project will not
deter, or interfere with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately
inconsistent with the new General Plan.
These findings are supported by Staff
analysis, minutes, maps and exhibits,
associated with this application and herein
incorporated by reference.
The lawful conditions stated in the approval
are deemed necessary to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration
Conditional Use Permit No. 1; and
for
APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 1,
subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval;
based on the Staff Report and attached findings.
MR:ks
A ttachmen ts:
1. Environmental Assessment
2. Exhibits
3. Conditions of Approval
STAFFRPT\CUP1 3
VICI N ITY MAP
N.T S
LOCATION MAP '
NTS,
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
2. Address and Phone
t~m~er o~ Proponent:
Date of ~nvironmental
Assessment:
Agency Requ~z'lng
Assessment:
Name of Proposal,
if explicable:
Location of Proposal:
James L. Ramsey
P.O. Box 607
Temecula, California 92390
(714) 676-5156
May 15, 1990
CITY OF TEXECULA
C.U.P. #1
East side of Jefferson Avenue, Be-
tween Winchester Road and Overland Dr.
II
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
ae
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
be
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
t(on or overcovering of the soil?
X
de
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features7
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
ee
Any substantial Increase In wind or
water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site?
X
X
BLANKlEa!FORMS -1-
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands. or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes. landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
be
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
de
Change in the amount of curface
water in any water body?
ee
Discharge Into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited'
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
fe
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
Yes
X
~ N_~o
X
X
X
X
BLANKIESIFORMS -2-
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants ( including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants ) ?
be
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique. rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
de
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
be
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique. rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
yes
X
Maybe N_,9o
X
X
X
BLANKI ES/FORMS -3-
10.
11.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population· Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
'growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing· Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create m demand for
additional housing?
TrsnsportationlCirculstion. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
Yes
Maybe
N_9
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANK I ESIFORMS -~-
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
ee
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
fe
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmentJi services?
15. Energy, Will the proposal result in:
16.
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
be
Substantial Increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Yes
Maybe
No
x
.X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANK I EelFORMS
17.
18.
19.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause m physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Y, es
Maybe
No
X
X
B LA N K I ES/FORMS -6-
Yes Mayb~e N_9o
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? I A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? I A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
BLANKIESIFORMS -7-
III.
Earth
1.a.
1.b.
1 .c-d.
1.e.
1.f.
1.g.
Air
2.a-c.
Water
3.a.
3.b,g.
3oc.
3.d-f.
Environmental Evaluation
No. The project site will require very little grading. As a result there
will not be an impact to the site~s geologic substructure.
Yes. All development disrupts the soil profile to some degree and
results in soil displacement, compaction and overcovering. The degree
of impact for this site will be minimal and is considered insignificant.
No. Since the site will require relatively little grading, there will not
be a change in topography. There are no unique physical features on
the site.
Yes Wind and water erosion potentials will increase after grading and
during the construction phase of the project. This impact will remain
high until disturbed areas are planted. Wind erosion will be mitigated
through minimal grading, retention of natural vegetation whenever
feasible, the use of watering trucks and hydroseeding of disturbed
areas after grading. After the project is completed, increased water
run-off during floods may occur. Water will be channeled to drainage
easements and streets.
No. The proposed project is not located near a creek or stream.
Yes. The project site is located in an area designated as subject to
liquefaction and subsidence by the Riverside County General Plan
Seismic Geologic Map. A geologic report should be prepared, supported
with mitigation measures of necessary, to avoid any undue harm.
No. An RV sales and storage business on the subject site will not
create any odor, affect the area~s climate, or impact the air quality.
No. Development of the subject site will not affect any body of water
movements.
Yes Development of the subject site will increase the amount of
impermeable surfaces which will decrease the absorption rate and
change the quantity of ground water. Since the subject site is 1.67
acres, this is not considered a significant impact.
No. Flood waters will continue to be directed to the streets and flood
channels.
No. The proposed project will not impact the amount or quality of
surface waters in any water body, or the rate of flow of ground waters.
STAFFRPT\CUP1 8
3h.
No. The proposed RV sales and storage will not affect the public water
supply.
3.i.
Yes. The subject site is located within a 100 year flood plain and dam
inundation area as designated by the Riverside County General Plan.
Development in this site will be subject to Riverside County Ordinances
458, 457, 460, 348, and 555 to help avoid undue harm.
Plant Life
4.a-d.
No. It appears that the subject site has previously been graded. The
only plant life on the site is weeds. It is highly unlikely that an
endangered plant life exists on the site·
Animal Life
5.a-c.
No. The subject site is located in an urbanized area where it is highly
unlikely that any endangered wildlife exists. The site is not located in
an area of known wildlife habitat·
Noise
6,8,
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during
construction. Long term noise impacts will occur due to increased
traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant due to
the project's vicinity to 1-15 and surrounding land uses.
6.b.
No. Severe noise will not be generated by the proposed use.
Liclht and Glare
Maybe. The project site is located within the Mt. Palomar Observatory
Street Lighting Policy Area which recommends the use of low pressure
sodium vapor ILPSV) light to help avoid interference with the Mt.
Palomar telescope. The use of LPSV lights will reduce the light and
glare produced by the proposed use.
Land Use
No. The Southwest Area Plan designates the site for commercial
purposes. The proposed land use would be consistent with this
designation.
Natural Resources
9.a-b.
No. A recreational vehicle sales use on the subject site will not increase
the consumption rate of any natural or non-renewal natural resources·
Risk of Upset
10.a-b.
No. A recreational vehicle sales use on the subject site will not require
STAFFRPT\CUP1 9
the use of any hazardous substances. The proposal does not include
a gas pump to fill up the vehicles. Durin9 construction, it should not
be necessary to close any streets which would interfere with emergency
vehicles.
Population
11.
No. A recreational vehicle sales use will not generate a significant
number of jobs to alter the growth rate of population in the area.
Housinq
12.
No. A recreational vehicle sales use will not generate a significant
number of jobs to create a demand for additional housing.
Transportation / Ci rcu lation
13.a,c-f.
No. The proposed project will not generate a substantial amount of
vehicle traffic nor will it increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians. The project will not alter the present
patterns of circulation on the movement of goods.
13.b.
Yes. A recreational vehicle sales use will require additional parking fo~
vehicle display and for customers.
Public Services
14.
No. The proposed use will not generate a need for additional public
services.
Enerqy
15.a,b.
No. A recreational vehicle sales use on the subject site will not result
in the substantial use or increase in demand of fuel or energy.
Utilities
16.a-f.
No. A recreational vehicle sales use on the site will not require
substantial alterations to any utility.
Human Health
17.a,b.
No. The proposed use will not create a health hazard or increase human
exposure to hazardous materials.
Aesthetics
18.
No. Development of the subject site will not obstruct any scenic vistas
or view that is open to the public.
S~AFFRPT\CUP1 10
Recreation
19.
No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses.
Cultural Resources
20.
No. The proposed recreational vehicle sales use will not impact any
historic, cultural, or sacred resource.
Mandatory findinqs of siqnificance
21 .a-c.
No. The proposed project will not significantly affect plants or wildlife,
achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental
goals, or have cumulative impacts.
21 .d.
Yes. The project will not affect the environment causing substantial
adverse effects on human beings, but the natural environment of the
site may affect human beings. These natural hazards include a 100 year
flood plain, dam inundation, subsidence, and liquefaction. Prior to any
development, the appropriate analysis, geologic and hydrologic, should
be prepared.
STAFFR PT\CUP 1 11
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have s significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Is
required.
8/29/90
Date
For CITY OF TEMECULA
BLANKIESlFORMS -
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 1 TO PERMIT OPERATION OF AN
AUTOMOBILE SALES LOT AND A 528 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF JEFFERSON
AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND OVERLAND
DRIVE.
WHEREAS, James L. Ramsay flied CUP No. 1 in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which
the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said CUP application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said CUP on September
10, 1990, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said CUP;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
~a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
STAFFRPT\CUP1 1
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
Ic)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed CUP is consistent with the SWAP and meets
the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to
wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
{a)
There is reasonable probability that CUP No.
I proposed will be consistent with the general
plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within a reasonable
time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to'Section 18.261e), no CUP may be approved
unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be
detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and
further, that any CUP approved shall be subject to such conditions as
shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of
the community.
STAFFRPT\CUP1
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the CUP proposed
is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
project will
Declaration,
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
therefore, is hereby granted.
SECT ION 3. Conditions.
That the city of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves CUP
No. 1 for the operation and construction of an automobile sales lot and a 528 square
foot office located at the west side of Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and
Overland Drive subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 1990.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 10th day of September, 1990 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNI NG COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\CUP1 3
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have read, understand and accept the conditions for approval set forth
herein above in this Resolution of approval for CUP No. 1.
DATED: By
Name
Title
STAFFRPT\CUP1 ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 1
CouncilApprovalDate:
Ex pi rati on Date:
Planninq Department
1. All signage shall require approval by separate permit.
2. All landscaping shall be required by separate permit.
3. Reciprocal access easements shall remain unobstructed.
This conditional use permit shall be subject to Planning Commission review
every two years. The permit shall remain active until such times as the
Commission determines that the use is not in conformance with the approved'
conditions of approval.
5. Applicant shall maintain 20 parking spaces for customer use.
6. No repair or mechanical maintenance will be permitted on site.
7. The conditional use permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 18.30 of
Ordinance 3~8.
8. This Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void after 10 years.
9. This Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to Planning Commission review
every 2 years.
10. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and
irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director. of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order. Landscaping shall provide screening at all
property lines to a minimum of ~8 inches.
11. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
12. The use shall be restricted to the sale of automobiles. No other uses shall be
allowed by this permit.
13. A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown
STAFFRPT\CUP1 1
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
on Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain
on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of
Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and
shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height
of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade,
or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17
inches by 22 clearly and conspicuously states the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in
blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of.
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning PUBLIC USE
PERMIT NO. __ The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee
of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in
the defence, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two 12 ) years of approval date; otherwise
it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use is meant the
baginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the
two ( 2 ) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the
baginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit 1, or as amended by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
All proposed painted parking lot surface identified on Exhibit A shall be
replaced by landscaped planters and shall be shown on landscape plans prior
to landscape approval.
STAFFRPT\CUP1 2
Buildinq & Safety Department
21. Flood mitigation fees will be required.
22. The sales office structure shall be placed on a permanent foundation.
23. The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two
weeks processing time to obtain all required clearances prior to final
inspection.
Enqineerinq Department
All Engineering Department Conditions shall be met prior to issuance of grading
permit, unless otherwise stated.
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
25.
The developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all
fees prior to the approval of plans.
26.
A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the right-of-
way.
27.
The developer shall submit four (~) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
28.
The developer shall submit four (1~) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code, Chapter 70, the Interim Development Guidelines and as may be
additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be
drawn on 2~"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer.
29.
The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of
building permits.
30.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-d-
way.
31.
No grading shall take place prior to the grading plans being complete,
appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer.
32°
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
33.
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
STAFFRPT\CUP1
3
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
The developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by
alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of fiow.
Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities and
by securing a drainage easement.
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site,
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
A permit from the Riverside County Flood Control District is required for
work within its easement.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
For a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing
development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate.
Such fees may include, but are not subject to: Drainage Fees, Permit and
Plan Checking Fees.
The applicant
agencies:
shall obtain clearance and/or permits
City Engineer
Environmental Health
Fire Department
Planning Department
Riverside County Flood Control
City of Temecula
Riverside Transit Agency
CATV
from the following
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated {assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
STAFFRPT\CUP1 ~
Fire Department
With respect to the Conditions of Approval regarding the above referenced plot plan,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
The fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance 5~6.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1,500 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants ( 6"x~"x2 1/2x2 1/2 ),
will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of
the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required
fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrantis) in the system.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types,.
location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements.
Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local
water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of
the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the
Riverside County Fire Department."
~6. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $q13.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department. a check or money order equaling the sum
of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This
amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
50.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
51o
A 25 foot access aisle shall be maintained free and clear at all times through
all portions of the parking area.
Health Department
52. "Will-serve" letters from water and sew.ring agencies will be required prior
STAFFRPT\CUP1 5
to any building plan approval.
53.
If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the
Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Branch (Jon
Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been
cleared for:
a. Underground storage tanks.
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185).
d. Waste reduction management.
CaITrans
A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to
limit physical access to the state highway.
55. Landscaping along the state highway shall be low and forgiving in nature.
56.
Care shall be taken when developing this property to preserve and perpetuat~
the existing drainage pattern of the state highway. Particular consideration
should be given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure that a highway
drainage problem is not created.
57.
Any necessary noise attenuation shall be provided as part of the development
of this property.
STAFFRPT\CUP1 6
ITEM NO.
15
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
OCTOBER 4, 1990
MEETING DATE
OCTOBER 9, 199O
SUBJECT:
SAM HICKS PARK
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of
Sam Hicks Park subject to the reverter contained in the Grant Deed and the
Declaration of Restrictions, and subject to the Old Town Temecula
Foundation approving the revised land lease for the Museum.
DISCUSSION: Last July, the City Council considered the offer from the Sam
Hicks Park Foundation to dedicate Sam Hicks Park to the City. The CSD has
budgeted funds to maintain the Park. The Old Town Temecula Foundation
has an existing lease of a portion of the Park and they intend to raise funds
to build and operate a museum.
When the City Council considered this matter last July, they directed the
City Attorney to attempt to revise the documents to clarify how the Park
would be used, and to seek to renegotiate the museum lease in order to
reduce the lease term, improve the terms of insurance, and establish a time
for construction of the museum.
The City Attorney revised the documents and sent them out for review by
the parties on August 6, 1990, and the Park Foundation replied on
September 10th. Accordingly, the restrictions on the property have been
expanded to allow the Park to be used for a historical, educational, public
park or public recreational purposes. This is a broader definition than the
limitation to park uses as originally proposed by the Foundation. The
Foundation has insisted that the reverter clause be retained in the property.
sff/AGD14757
However, it has been modified to include the requirement that the
Foundation first notify the City of any alleged breach of the use restriction
and be given an opportunity to cure the breach before any attempt is made
to recover the property.
We have also revised the land lease to a forty (40) year term with a twenty
(20) year option. This is an improvement from the forty and forty year term
originally proposed. We have also included a five year construction schedule
in the lease as well as modifying the insurance provisions to require it to be
adjusted according to the CPI.
-2-
sff/DEC14757(100490)
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DECLARATION OF RES TRIC TIONS
This DECI. ARA TION OF RESTRICTIONS made this day of
, 19__, by SAM HICKS PARK FOUNDATION, hereinafter referred
to as "Declarant."
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of that certain parcel of land
situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California,
being those portions of Lots 17 through 20 of Block 23 of the Town of
Temecula as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps in
the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, described
as follows:
BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot
17; thence along the northwesterly lines of said lots
17 through 20, South 44°24'51" West 81.51 feet
to the northerly line of Mercedes Street (60.00 feet
wide) as described in a deed recorded April 15,
1976 as Instrument No. 50513 of Official Records
in the Office of the COunty Recorder of said
Riverside County; thence along said northerly line,
North 88008'29" East 112.69 feet to the
northeasterly line of said Lot 17; thence along said
northeasterly line, North 45°31 '37" West 77.89
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
-1-
sff/DEC14757(100490)
WHEREAS, Declarant intends to grant, for valuable consideration, the
above described property, restricting it in accordance with a plan designed
to preserve the historical qualities of said land for the benefit of the City of
Temecula.
NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant declares that said real property shall be
held, transferred, encumbered, used, sold, conveyed, leased, and occupied,
subject to the covenants and restrictions hereinafter set forth expressly and
exclusively for the use and benefit of said property and of each and every
person who now or in the future owns any portion or portions of said real
property.
Land Use
The property shall be used for historical, educational, public park,
and/or public recreational purposes only.
Name of Premises
2. The name of the park shall remain SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK.
Location of Monument
The Location of the "THEY PASSED THIS WAY"' monument is to
remain the same.
Maintenance
The City of Temecula, the Community Services District or their
designee shall maintain landscaping and trash pick-up. Additional
landscaping should be implemented - peripheral flower gardens and
herb gardens should be added in such a way as to not diminish the
usable footage of the park. The landscaping shall also, at all times,
reflect the 1890 theme of the TEMECULA HISTORICAL OVERLAY.
(The TEMECULA HISTORICAL OVERLAY shall be placed on file wih the
Temecula City Clerk concurrently with recordation of this Declaration.)
Plaques
The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District or
their designate shall place all plaques commemorating MEMORIAL
TREES on granite bases cemented into the ground.
-2-
sff/DEC14757(100490)
Irapro vements
Curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be placed around the Park on
Moreno Road and Mercedes Avenue. Lighting of the Park is to be done
using the old time fixtures as used in OLD TOWN TEMECULA. All
buildings shall reflect at all times the 1890 theme of this TEMECULA
HISTORICAL OVERIA Y.
Enforcement
Grantor shall be entitled to INJUNCTIVE RELIEF and REASONABLE
ATTORNEY FEES if the Grantee and/or its successors in interest violate
or attempt to violate any covenant contained herein.
Planning
Recommendations of the TEMECULA COMMUNITY PLAN TASK FORCE
are to be incorporated in the planning of the Park. (The TEMECULA
COMMUNITY PLAN TASK FORCE will be more specifically defined at a
date subsequent to the date of this Declaration and shall be placed on
file and referred to as required by this provision.)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration of
Restrictions the day and year first above written.
Declarant:
Nancy Maurice, President
Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation
-3-
sff/DEC14757 (100490)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of Riverside
ss
On this day of , in the year 19_, before me,
, a notary public, personally appeared ,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who
executed the within instrument as president of the corporation therein
named and acknowledged to me that the corporation excecuted it.
Notary for the State of California
My commission expires:
,19_
-4-
sff/DED14757(100490)
=IECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
CORPORA TION GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:
Documentary transfer tax is $
( )
I )
( )
computed on full value of property conveyed, or
computed on full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time
of sale
unincorporated area: ( ) City of Temecula, and
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
SAM HICKS PARK FOUNDA T/ON, a non-profit corporation, a corporation organized under
the laws of the State of California, hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body
corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
This conveyance is made subject to those covenants and restrictions contained in that
certain Agreement, executed by dated , 19 , and recorded on
Official Records of Riverside County, California and upon condition that said property be
used solely and perpetually for historical, educational, public park and/or public
recreational purposes. If said property is not used solely and perpetually for historical,
educational, public park and/or public recreational purposes, then Grantor or its assigns,
and successors, without paying any compensation for any buildings or other
-1-
sff/DED14757(100490)
,mprovements or betterments that may then be upon said premises, and without making
any compensation or incurring any liability for damages or losses or any kind, shall have
the power to terminate all right, title, and interest in the property granted by this deed to
Grantee and its successors and assigns, in the manner provided by law for the exercise
of this power of termination, and shall thereupon have and enjoy forever all property
granted by this deed, as if this conveyance had not been made. Grantee, its assigns or
successors, shall thereupon immediately surrender possession of said property, and shall
forfeit all rights thereto as required hereunder. Provided, however, that Grantor may not
exercise this power to terminate unless, within ninety (90) days after the breach of the
use restriction, written notice is given to the Grantee of the breach, and Grantee fails to
correct the breach within ninety (90) days after receiving notice of the breach of the use
restriction.
Executed on
, 19 ,at
, California.
Mail tax statements as directed above.
State of California
County of Riverside
On this __ day of
notary public, personally appeared
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
SS
, in the year 19_, before me, , a
, proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as president
of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed
it.
Notary Public for the
State of California
My commission expires:
,19
-2-
LAND LEASE
THIS LEASE is entered into as of , 19_, between the
CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called "Lessor," and OLD TOWN
TEMECULA FOUNDATION, a California non-profit public benefit corporation,
hereinafter called "Lessee." Lessor acquired title in the name of the CITY OF
TEMECULA to the Property hereinafter described by deed dated
, 19m,and recorded on , 191, in the Office of the
Recorder of Riverside County, California, in Book __ at Page ~
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of covenants and promises
hereinafter mentioned, the parties, Lessor and Lessee, agree as follows:
1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee,
and Lessee here hires and takes from Lessor, the Property to be defined as
that land to be occupied by the museum as per the attached plot plan
(Exhibit "A" attached hereto) located on Moreno Road, Temecula, California,
hereinafter called the "Property."
2. TERM. The term of this agreement shall be forty (40) years,
commencing on November 1, 1990, and ending on October 31, 2030. Rent
is due and payable to and including the date of termination.
This Lease may be extended as set forth in paragraph four (4) of this
Agreement.
3. RENT. Lessee agrees to pay Lessor as rent for the use and
occupancy of the Property the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) per year,
payable in advance on the first (1st) day of August of each year
commencing with August 1, 1990, and continuing thereafter during
Lessee's use and occupancy of the Property.
If the Lessee renews the term of this Lease as provided in paragraph
four (4), the Lease shall continue for the same rental rate.
Rent shall be payable in lawful money of the United States to Lessor
at the address stated herein or to such other persons or at such other places
as Lessor may designate in writing.
4. OPTION TO RENEW. As part of the consideration for the
execution of this Lease, Lessor hereby grants to Lessee, an option to extend
and renew the provisions of this Lease for a twenty-year term, upon the
sff/AGR14757(100490)
same terms and conditions hereof. The option to renew and extend the
provisions of this Lease must be exercised, if at all, by notice in writing
given to Lessor not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration on the
previous term.
5. USE OF THE PROPERTY. The Property shall be used for the
construction and operation of a museum and an annex building of 3,000
square feet, including public restrooms. Construction of said structures shall
commence within three (3) years of the date of this Lease. In addition, a
final inspection or certificate of occupancy shall be obtained within five (5)
years of the date of this Lease. The Property shall also be used for the
relocation of a church of 1,200 square feet. Other construction projects, not
specifically permitted by this Lease are prohibited. The design and location
of said structures shall be subject to Lessor's approval, which approval shall
not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee also agrees to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances of every governmental
body or agency whose authority extends to the leased Property, or to the
business conducted upon the leased Property.
6. AL TERA TIONS. Lessee may not make any alterations (other
than insubstantial ones) to the leased Property or structures thereon without
Lessor's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld. Lessee, at Lessee's own expense, shall comply with all present
and future governmental requirements arising out of, in connection with, or
necessitated by such alterations.
7. FIXTURES. All fixtures placed on the leased Property by Lessee
shall at all times be and remain the personal property of Lessee, and Lessee
shall have the right to remove such fixtures at any time during the term
hereof and also within five (5) business days after the termination of this
Lease. Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole expense, restore and repair any damage
to the leased Property caused or occasioned by the removal of the fixtures.
Such repair and restoration shall be performed within five (5) business days
after the expiration of this Lease and shall be performed in compliance with
the terms and conditions of Paragraph 8 of this Lease relating to repairs.
8. REPAIRS. Lessee accepts the Property as being in good order,
repair and condition. At all times during the term of this Lease, Lessee shall,
at Lessee's own cost and expense, and at no cost and expense to Lessor,
maintain the Property and all portions of the Property in good order and
repair and make all repairs and replacements that may become necessary to
the Property, any buildings or improvements on the Property, or any
-2-
sff/AGR14757(100490)
sidewalks, landscaping, driveways, or parking areas that are part of or
appurtenant to the Property. Any and all repairs and replacements required
by this provision, both ordinary and extraordinary and both structural and
nonstructural, shall be made promptly by Lessee as required and shall
comply with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, and regulations.
Lessee hereby waives the provisions of sections 1941 and 1942 of the
California Civil Code relating to Lessor's duty for tenantable premises and
Lessee's right to make repairs and deduct the expenses of such repairs from
the rent.
9. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. Lessee shall recognize that the
installation and maintenance of landscaping on the Property is an integral
part of the lease. Lessee shall maintain and care for landscaping on the
Property using generally accepted methods of cultivation and watering.
Lessee shall maintain that standard of care necessary to prevent the
landscaping from deteriorating to the extent that its value as landscaping is
destroyed. Lessee shall also maintain landscape of Property in a manner and
design reflecting the 1890 theme of the TEMECULA HISTORICAL OVERLAY.
If Lessee fails to maintain the landscaping in such proper condition,
Lessor may give written notice of such deficiency to Lessee. If the Lessor
gives notice to Lessee of a deficiency, Lessee shall have thirty (30) business
days within which to take reasonable steps to cure the deficiency. If Lessee
has not commenced corrective activity within such thirty (30) days, the City
may elect to take the steps necessary to insure that the landscaping is
maintained and cared for. At least fifteen (15) days prior to entering the
Property to perform any such corrective work, Lessor shall either personally
serve a notice of its intent to enter the premises for this purpose on the
Lessee or mail a copy of such notice by certified mail to the Lessee's last
known address, or as shown on the tax rolls. Lessor may enter the Property
to perform such corrective work as it reasonably considers necessary and
proper to return the landscaping to its proper condition. Lessor may act
either through its own employees or through an independent contractor to
perform such corrective work.
If Lessor incurs costs, including administrative costs and attorney's
fees in returning the landscaping to its proper condition pursuant to the
procedure set forth in paragraph 7 above, Lessor may make a demand upon
Lessee for payment of such costs as are reasonable under the
circumstances. If Lessee fails to pay such costs within thirty (30) business
days after the date demand is made, the terms and provisions of this lease
shall terminate.
-3-
sff/AGR14757 (100490)
10. MECHANICS' LIENS. Lessee hereby agrees to keep the leased
Property and the improvements thereon or hereafter erected or placed
thereon, and every part thereof, and every estate, right, title, and interest
therein, or in or to any part thereof, at all times during the term of this
Lease, free and clear of mechanics' liens and other liens for labor, service,
supplies, equipment, or materials. Lessee also agrees to fully pay and
discharge and wholly protect and save harmless Lessor and all and every
part of the estate, right, title, and interest of Lessor in and to all and every
part of said demised Property and improvements against any and all
demands or claims that may or could ripen into such liens or labor claims.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee may, if Lessee furnishes Lessor with
a bond or other security against loss or liability by reason thereof in a form
acceptable to Lessor, contest, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, any such
liens or claims and litigate the same final judgment; in the event Lessee shall
have taken an appeal from an adverse judgment, Lessor shall at all times
during the pendency of such appeal prevent the execution of such judgment
pending appeal.
11. DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY. Should any building or
improvements on the leased Property be damaged or destroyed by fire, the
elements, Acts of God, or other causes not the fault of Lessee or any person
in or about the leased Property with the express or implied consent of
Lessee, they shall be repaired or replaced by Lessee at its own cost and
expense; however, should the cost of repairing or restoring any buildings or
improvements so damaged or destroyed exceed fifty percent (50%) of the
replacement cost of all buildings and improvements to be located on the
leased Property, Lessee may, at its option, either repair and restore the
damaged buildings and improvements or cancel this Lease.
12. SURRENDER OF PROPERTY. On expiration or sooner termination
of this Lease, or any extensions or renewal of this Lease, Lessee shall
promptly surrender and deliver said Property to Lessor in as good condition
as they are now at the date of this Lease, reasonable wear and tear and
repairs hereafter required to be made by Lessor excepted. This paragraph is
subject to the conditions of Paragraph 7 relating to removal of fixtures.
13. ,41.1ENABI!.ITY OF PROPERTY. Nothing in this Lease shall be
construed to restrict the alienability of said Property. Lessor retains the right
to sell or encumber said Property at any time during the term of this Lease.
-4-
sff/AGR14757(100490)
14. UTILITIES. Lessee agrees to pay for all utilities, including
telephone, water, gas, electricity, and any and all other services which may
be used in or upon the leased Property during the term of this Lease without
liability of Lessor. For each service, Lessee shall pay the cost for the use of
the service directly to the utility provider prior to the time that the charge
becomes delinquent.
15. TAXES. During the term of this Lease, Lessee shall pay before
delinquency (1) all taxes, assessments, license fees, and any other charges
of any type whatsoever that are levied, assessed, charged, or imposed on or
against Lessee's possessory interest and/or personal property installed or
located in or on the leased Property and that become payable during the
term of this lease and (2) all real property taxes and general and special
assessments levied and assessed against the leased Property.
16. WASTE OR NUISANCE. Lessee shall not commit or permit the
commission by others of any waste on said Property, including graffiti;
Lessee shall not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission
of any nuisance as defined in Section 3479 of the California Civil Code on
said Property; and Lessee shall not use or permit the use of said Property for
any unlawful purpose.
17. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING. Lessee may assign this Lease
or an interest therein and may also sublet the Property, provided Lessor first
obtains the written consent of Lessor to any such assignment or subletting.
If, during the term of this Lease, Lessee requests the written consent of
Lessor to any assignment or subletting, Lessor's consent shall not
unreasonably be withheld. A consent to one assignment or subletting, and
any subsequent assignment or subletting without Landlord's consent shall be
void and shall, at Landlord's option, terminate this Lease. Any approved
assignment or sublease shall not relieve Lessor of liability under the terms of
this Lease.
18. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE. Lessee agrees to indemnify and
save Lessor harmless from and against any and all claims arising from any
act, omission or negligence of Lessee, or its contractors, licensees, agents,
servants, or employees, or arising from any accident, injury or damage
whatsoever caused to any person or property occurring in, on, or about the
Property or any part of them, the sidewalks adjoining the Property, and from
and against all costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in or in connection
with any such claim or proceeding brought thereon, including, but not
limited to, court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
-5-
sff/AGR14757(100490)
Lessee shall maintain in full force during the term of this Lease, a
policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including property
damage, covering the leased Property and its use and occupation by Lessee,
insuring against liability for injuries to persons and property and for death of
any person or persons occurring in or about the Property. The minimum
amount of such insurance for the first year of the term of this Lease shall be
as follows: TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($250,000.00) for
any one person injured or killed, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($500,000.00) for any one accident, and FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($50,000.00) for property damage. Such amounts shall increase annually at
a rate equal to the Consumer Price Index. Lessee agrees to name Lessor as
an additional insured and shall furnish a certificate of insurance.
Lessee shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this Lease, a
policy or policies of insurance covering loss or damage to the Property, in
the amount of the full replacement value thereof, as the same may exists
from time to time, but in no event less than the total amount required by
lenders having liens on the Property, against all perils included within the
classification of fire, extended coverage, vandalism, malicious mischief,
flood, theft, and special extended perils ("all risk' as such term in used in
the insurance industry). Said insurance shall provide for payment of loss
thereunder to Lessor or to the holders of mortgages or deeds of trust on the
Property. Lessee shall, in addition, obtain and keep in force during the term
of this Lease a policy of rental value insurance covering a period of one year,
with loss payable to Lessor, which insurance shall also cover all real estate
taxes and insurance costs for said period. If the Lessee shall fail to procure
and maintain said insurance the Lessor may, but shall not be required to,
procure and maintain the same, but at the expense of Lessee. If such
insurance has a deductible clause, the deductible amount shall not exceed
$1,000.00 per occurrence, and Lessee shall be liable for such deductible
amount.
19. INSPECTION. Lessor may enter upon the Property at any
reasonable time for the purpose of inspecting the Property. "Reasonable
time" shall be defined as during normal operating hours.
20. INSOI, VENCY. The insolvency of Lessee as evidenced by a
receiver being appointed to take possession of all or substantially all of the
property of Lessee, or the making of a general assignment for the benefit of
creditors by Lessee, shall terminate the Lease and entitle Lessor to renter
and regain possession of leased Property.
-6-
sff/AGR14757(100490)
21. UNLAWFUL DETAINER. In the event of any breach of this Lease
by Lessee, Lessor, in addition to any other rights or remedies it may have,
may give Lessee a three-day notice to cure the breach or quit the premises.
If Lessee fails to do either, Lessor may bring a statutory proceeding in
unlawful detainer to regain possession of the Property. Any notice given by
the Lessor pursuant to this paragraph does not constitute termination of this
Lease unless expressly so declared by Lessor in the notice.
22. WAIVER OF BREACH. The waiver by Lessor of any breach of
any term, covenant, or condition herein contained shall not be deemed to be
a waiver of such term, covenant, or condition, or any subsequent breach of
the same or any other term, covenant, or condition herein contained, The
subsequent acceptance of rent hereunder by Lessor shall not be deemed to
be a waiver of any prior occurring breach by Lessee of any term, covenant,
or condition of this Lease, other than the failure of Lessee to pay the
particular rental so accepted, regardless of Lessor's knowledge of such prior
existing breach at the time of acceptance of such rent.
23. ABANDONMENT. In the event that Lessee shall be absent from
the demised Property for a period of 30 days after default in payment of rent
or other obligations imposed on Lessee by this Lease, such absence shall be
deemed to constitute an abandonment of Lessee's interest in the demised
Property and an abandonment by Lessee of any personal property left on the
demised Property, and Lessor may thereupon reenter the Property as
hereinbefore provided.
24. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS. The provisions of this Lease shall
be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors,
assigns and legal representatives of the parties hereto. Nothing in this
paragraph shall be construed as a consent by Lessor to any assignment of
this Lease or any interest therein by Lessee except as provided in Paragraph
18 of this Lease.
25. NOTICES AND PAYMENTS. Whenever notices and payments
are required to be given pursuant to the provisions of this Lease, they shall
be sent to either party, in writing and postage prepaid by registered mail,
addressed as follows:
To the Lessor at:
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
-7-
sff/AGR14757(100490)
To the Lessee at:
Old Town Temecula Foundation
P.O. Box 792
Temecula, CA 92390
Either party may change such address by written notice by registered mail to
the other party,
26. DEFAUL T, NOTICE OF DEFAUL T, BREACH. A default in the
performance of any promise of, or of any obligation imposed upon Lessor
and Lessee, shall not constitute a breach of this Lease unless the party in
default fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days after the written
notice of default has been served, except that failure to cure a default in the
payment of rent shall constitute a breach of this Lease if such default is not
cured within five (5) days after written notice of default has been served. If
either party breaches this Lease, the other party shall be entitled to pursue
every legal and equitable remedy available, including (but not limited to) the
right to terminate this Lease and the right to recover accrued rent, paid in
advance. Lessor, in addition to other remedies it may have, shall have the
immediate right to reentry, and may remove all persons and property from
the Property, such property may be stored at the cost of Lessee. The
prevailing party shall be reimbursed attorney's fees.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease the day
and year first above written.
LESSOR: LESSEE:
CITY OF TEMECUI. A,
A body corporate and politic
public benefit corporation
OLD TOWN TEMECULA
FOUNDATION
a California non-profit
By
By
-8-
ITEM NO. 16
sf f/AGDl1893
CITY OF TEMECULA
RGENDA REPORT
TO:
~ROM:
DATE:
MEETING DATE
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL
SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY ~
OCTOBER 4, 1990
OCTOBER 9, 1990
ADULT BUSINESS URGENCY ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDRTIONz That the City Council adopt ordinance No.
90-XX, an interim zoning ordinance regulating adult
businesses.
DISCUSSION: Staff recently learned that there is no
existing Riverside County Ordinance regulating adult
businesses (bookstores, movie houses, nightclubs, etc.).
Accordingly, the City Manager directed the City Attorney to
prepare an interim urgency ordinance until more detailed
development regulations may be prepared.
The ordinance does the following: it limits adult
businesses (including adult theaters) to the C-2 or a less
restrictive zoning. It also makes the existing CUP
requirement in Ordinance 348 applicable to adult uses and
adds additional conditions to be placed on the use. In
addition to a CUP, an adult business permit will be
required. This permit cannot be transferred and must be
renewed annually.
This ordinance may be adopted immediately for 45
days under Government Code Section 65858 (a copy of which is
enclosed). The ordinance then may be renewed for ten months
and fifteen days after notice and hearing.
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RELATING TO
ADULT BUSINESSES AND REQUIRING A PERMIT
THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has determined that it is necessary
to immediately examine the possible effects on the quality of residential and commercial
development of adult businesses locating within the City of Temecula and its residents; and
WHEREAS, the City has an interest in preserving the quality of urban life; and
WHEREAS, studies and experiences within other cities in Southern California show that
such adult businesses may cause blight or downgrading of residential and commercial areas;
WHEREAS, until the City has had a chance to more fully determine the possible
negative effects of such adult businesses, it is necessary to adopt an interim ordinance on an
urgency basis to regulate the location of adult businesses in order to protect public safety, health
and welfare.
WHEREAS, the City adopted by reference County of Riverside Ordinance No. 348
regulating Land use (hereinafter Ordinance No. 348);
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose and intent of this ordinance to
provide for the comprehensive and orderly regulation of adult businesses. It is recognized that
these establishments by their very nature may have serious objectionable operational
characteristics which, when concentrated, can have a deleterious effect upon areas. In order to
protect and preserve the public health, safety and welfare of the citizenry, especially including
minors, special regulation of the time, place and manner of the operation and location of these
establishments is necessary.
SECTION 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases shall, for the purposes of
this chapter, be defined as follows, unless it is clearly apparent from the context that another
meaning is intended.
A. "Adult bookstore" means an establishment having as a substantial or significant
portion of its stock in trade material which is distinguished or characterized by its emphasis on
matter depicting, describing or related to specified sexual activity or specified anatomical area,
or an establishment with a segment or section thereof devoted to the sale or display of such
material.
3lOrds04 -1-
B. "Adult business" means a business which is conducted exclusively for the patronage
of adults and as to which minors are specifically excluded from patronage, either by law and/or
by the operators of such business. "Adult business" also means and includes any adult
bookstore, adult cabaret, adult hotel or motel, adult theater, adult model studio, body painting
studio, massage parlor and any other business involving "specified sexual activities" or display
of "specified anatomical areas."
C. "Adult cabaret" means any nightclub, bar, restaurant, or similar establishment which
is distinguished or characterized by its emphasis in the entertainment presented on:
1. Live performances which is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on
specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas; and/or
2. Films, motion pictures, video cassettes, or slides or other photographic reproductions
whose dominant or predominant character and theme is the depiction of specified sexual
activities or specified anatomical areas for the observation by patrons.
D. "Adult hotel/motel" means a hotel or motel, which provides through closed-circuit
television or other media, material which is distinguished or characterized by the emphasis on
matter depicting or describing or related to specified sexual activities or specified anatomical
E. "Adult model studio" means any establishment open to the public where for any form
of consideration of gratuity, human models who display specified anatomical areas are provided
to be observed, sketched, drawn, painted sculpted, photographed, or otherwise depicted by
persons other than the proprietor paying such consideration or gratuity. This provision shall not
apply to any school of art, a firm which is operated by an individual, firm association,
partnership, corporation or institution which meets the requirements established in the Education
Code of the State of California for the issuance or conferring of a diploma.
F. "Adult picture arcade" means any place to which the public is permitted or invited
wherein coin or token-operated, or electronically, electrically, or mechanically controlled still
or motion picture machines, projectors, or other image producing devices are maintained to
show images to five or fewer persons per machine, at any one time, and where the emphasis of
the images so displayed is on depiction of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical
areas.
G. "Adult theater" means a theater, concert hall, auditorium or similar establishment,
either indoor or outdoor in nature, which presents live entertainment, films, motion pictures,
slide photographs, video cassettes or similar photographic reproductions which are distinguished
or characterized by their emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to specified sexual
activity or specified anatomical areas.
H. "Body painting studio" means any establishment or business which provides the
3lOrds04 -2-
service of applying paint or any other substance, whether transparent or not, to or on the human
body when such body is wholly or partially nude in terms of specified anatomical areas.
I. "Massage parlor" means any place where for any forms of consideration or gratuity,
massage, alcohol rub, administration of fomentations, electric or magnetic treatments, or any
other treatment of manipulation of the human body occurs.
J. "Material relative to adult businesses" means and includes but is not limited to
accessories, books, magazines, photographs, prints, drawings, paintings, motion pictures and
pamphlets or any combination thereof.
K. "Specified anatomical areas" means and includes any of the following:
1. Less than complete and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, buttocks,
anus, or female breasts below a point above the tope of the areola; or
2. Human male genitals in a discernible turgid state, even if completely or opaquely
covered.
L. "Specified sexual activities" means and includes any of the following:
1. The fondling or touching of human genitals, pubic regions, buttocks, anus, or female
breasts; or
2. Sex acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including intercourse, oral
copulation, or sodomy; or
3. Masturbation, actual or simulated; or
4. Excretory functions as part of, or in connection with, any of the activities set forth
in subsections 1 through 3 of this section; or
5. Human genitals in a state of Sexual stimulation or arousal.
SECTION 3. Restricted to Commercial Zones. Notwithstanding any provision to the
contrary in this rifle, no adult business shall be established, expanded or conducted except in a
C-1/CP and then shall conform to the regulations contained in this ordinance.
SECTION 4. Conditional Use Permit. No adult business shall be opened, established
or relocated except upon the granting of a conditional use permit therefore in accordance with
Sections 18.28 of Ordinance No. 348 and Section 5 hereof, in addition to the Adult Business
Permit required by this Ordinance. The requirements of Ordinance 348 and of the ordinance first
shall be construed in a manner to make them compatible. Where there is a conflict between the
two, this ordinance shall control.
3/Ords04 -3-
The requirements of this ordinance shall be similarly construed with Riverside County
Ordinance Nos. 543 and 627, as adopted by reference by the City Council. The restrictions of
Ordinance No. 348 shall continue to apply.
SECTION 5. Operational Criteria. In addition to the base zone requirements governing
use and minimum development standards, the following additional requirements shall be met by
adult businesses which additional requirements shall be included in the conditional use permit.
A. The use shall have an Adult Business Permit.
B. Said use shall have a separate business entrance adjacent to the required parking area.
Additional off-street parking facilities may be required if deemed necessary by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
C. The Planning Commission shall review and approve all signing and architectural
graphics.
D. Maximum occupancy load, fire exits, aisles, and fire equipment shall be regulated,
designed and provided in accordance with the fire department and building regulations and
standards adopted by the City of Temecula.
E. No adult business shall be conducted in any manner that permits the observation of
any material depicting, describing, or relating to specified sexual activities or specified
anatomical areas from any public way or from any location outside the building or area of such
establishment. This provision shall apply to any display, decoration, sign, show window, or
other opening.
F. Lighting in Parking Lots. Lighting shall be required which is designed to illuminate
all off-street parking areas serving such use for the purpose of increasing the personal safety of
store patrons and reducing the incidents of vandalism and theft. Said lighting shall be shown
on the required plot plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community
Development.
G. Amplified Sound. No loudspeakers or sound equipment shall be used by an adult
business for the amplification of sound to a level discernible by the public beyond the walls of
the building in which such use is conducted or which violates any noise restrictions as may be
adopted by the City of Temecula.
H. The building entrance to the adult business shall be clearly and legible posted by a
notice indicating that minors are precluded from entering the premises. Said notice shall be
constructed and posted to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
I. Picture Arcades.
3/Ord;~04 -4-
I. No picture arcade shall be maintained or operated unless the complete interior of the
picture arcade is visible upon entrance to such picture arcade. No partially or fully enclosed
booths or partially or fully concealed booths shall be maintained. Notwithstanding Section 11
of this ordinance, any picture arcade lawfully in existence prior to the adoption of this subsection
shall conform to the provision of this subsection within three (3) months of the effective date of
this section. This subsection shall also be applicable to any picture arcade which is not open for
business prior to the date that this section takes effect.
2. Minimum Lighting. No person shall operate a picture arcade unless a light level of
not less than two (2) foot candles at floor level is maintained in every portion of said
establishment to which the public is admitted.
3. Wall and Partition Construction. No person shall operate a picture arcade unless any
wall or partition which is situated so as to create a room or enclosure in which any image
producing device is located is constructed of not less than 1-hour fire resistive material.
4. Minimum Aisle Width. No person shall operate a picture arcade in which the width
of the aisles in any room where an image producing device is located is less than forty-two (42)
inches.
5. Minimum Doorways. No person shall operate a picture arcade unless there are no
fewer than two (2) doorways of a width no less than thirty-six (36) inches which provide ingress
or egress from any room from which an image producing device is located; provided, however,
that one (1) doorway shall be sufficient in the event the fire marshal should so determine. The
doorway or doorways shall be unlocked during business hours.
6. Lighted Exit Signs. No person shall operate a picture arcade unless over every
doorway which provides egress from any room in which an image producing device is located,
an internally illuminated exit sign with letters of at least five (5) inches in height is maintained.
7. Maximum Occupancy Load. No person shall operate a picture arcade in which the
number of persons in any room or partitioned portion of a room where an image producing
device is located exceeds one (1) person per thirty (30) square feet. The maximum occupancy
permitted in any room or partitioned portion of a room in which an image producing device is
located shall be conspicuously posted by the operator, sand shall remain posted, at the entrance
to said room.
8. Maximum Number of Devices. No person shall operate a picture arcade in which
the number of image producing devices exceeds the maximum occupancy load permitted in any
room or partitioned portion of a room in which an image producing device is located.
SECTION 6. Adult Business Permit.
A. Operators of adult businesses must obtain an adult business permit in addition to a
3lOrds04 -5-
conditional use permit. Such adult business permit shall be non-transferable and must be
renewed on a yearly basis on the anniversary date of the original application. The permit
obtained is not transferable and a new permit must be obtained if the business is leased, sold or
otherwise transferred for any reason.
B. Applicants for such permits shall file a written, signed and verified application or
renewal application showing:
1. The name and permanent address of applicant.
2. The name and business address of the applicant. If the applicant is a corporation, the
name shall be exactly as set forth in its articles of incorporation and the applicant shall show the
name and residence address of each of the officers, directors, and each stockholder owning not
less than twenty-five percent of the stock of the corporation. If the applicant is a partnership,
the application shall show the name and residence address of each of the members, including
limited partners;
3. A detailed description of the manner of providing proposed entertainment, including
type of entertainment and the number of persons engaged in the entertainment;
4. Hours of operation;
5. A location, address and floor plan showing where the specific entertainment uses are
proposed to be conducted within the building; and
6. The name or names of the person or persons having the management or supervision
of applicant's business and of any entertainment; and
7. A statement of the nature and character of applicant's business if any, to be carried
on in conjunction with such entertainment.
8. For a renewal application, applicant in addition shall indicate any changes since the
filing of the initial application.
C. All applications for a permit or renewal shall be filed with the City Police
Department on forms prescribed by the Police Department. Each application determined by
resolution of the City Council shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee for filing or renewal
determined by resolution of the City Council, which fees will be used to defray the costs of
investigation, inspection and processing of such applications.
D. After an investigation, the Police Chief shall issue a permit or renewal if he finds:
1. That the building, structure, equipment and location used by the business for which
a permit is required herein complies with the requirements and meets the standards of the health,
zoning, fire and safety laws of the State of California and of the ordinances of the City of
3/OrdsO4 -6-
Temecula;
2. That the applicant, his or her employee, agent, partner, director, officer, stockholder
or manager has not knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material
fact in the application for a permit, or in any report or record required to be filed with the
Police Department, Sheriff or other department of the City;
3. That the applicant has not had any type of adult business permit revoked by any
public entity within two (2) years of the date of the application;
4. That on the date that the business for which a permit is required herein commences,
and thereafter, there will be a responsible person on the premises to act as manager at all time
during which the business is open; and
5. That the applicant has shown how the on premises manager will prevent the business
from being used as a place where prostitution, assignation, or any lewd act could occur.
6. That a conditional use permit has been granted for the use.
E. Decision of Police Chief. The decision of the Police Chief regarding a permit
application shall be issued within 45 days of the date of the filing of the application unless he
has set the matter for hearing before the City Council. Such hearing must be held and a decision
rendered within sixty (60) days from the date of the application, unless the matter is continued
at the request of the applicant. No application for a permit shall be denied without giving the
applicant an opportunity for a hearing before the City Council.
F. Suspension or Revocation of Permit. After an investigation, notice and hearing, the
Police Chief shall suspend or revoke an existing adult business permit, as shall be found
necessary to assure the preservation of the public health and safety, if the evidence presented
establishes that one or more of the following conditions exist:
1. The building, structure, equipment and location used by the business falls to comply
with the requirements or fails to meet the standards of the health, zoning, fire and safety laws
of the State of California, or of the ordinances of the City of Temecula;
2. The permittee, his or her employee, agent, partner, director, officer, stockholder or
manager has knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material facts in
the application for a permit, or in any report or record required to be filed with the Police,
Sheriff or other department of the City;
3. The permittee has had any type of adult business permit revoked by any public entity
within two (2) years of the date the permit was issued;
4. There was not a responsible person on the premises to act as manager at all times
3lOrds04 -7-
which the business was open;
5. That the permittee, manager or any agent or employee of the permittee or manger has
been convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction in conjunction with or as a result of the
operation of the subject adult business and after the date of issuance of the conditional use permit
for said business;
6. The picture arcade has been used as a place where sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral
copulation, masturbation, prostitution, assignation or other lewd acts occur or have occurred;
7. The permittee, his or her employee, agent, panner, director, officer, stockholder or
manger has violated any provision of this Ordinance; or
8. The conditional use permit for the use has been suspended or revoked.
SECTION 7. Suspension and Revocation of Conditional Use Permit. In addition to the
grounds set forth at Section 18.31 of Ordinance No. 348, the City Council may suspend or
revoke any conditional use permit if it is found that any of the following conditions exist in
addition to the criteria set forth in this ordinance:
A. The operations conducted by the permittee does not comply with all applicable laws,
including, but not limited to, the City's building, health, zoning and fire ordinances and this
ordinance;
B. That the approved use has been expanded without City Council approval; that the
approved use has been partially or wholly converted to another adult business without City
Council approval; that the conditional use permit has not been utilized within six months of its
issuance.
C. The Adult Business Permit has been suspended or revoked.
SECTION 8. Regulations-Nonexclusive. The regulations set forth in this Ordinance are
not intended to be exclusive and compliance therewith shall not excuse noncompliance with any
other regulations pertaining to the operation of adult businesses set forth elsewhere in the
ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula as set forth in Section 4.
SECTION 9. Existing Nonconforming Adult Businesses. This ordinance does not apply
to adult businesses operating on the date of adoption.
SECTION 10. Violation--Penalties. Any firm, corporation or person, whether as
principal, agent, employee or otherwise, violating or causing the violation of any of the
provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment
for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Any violation of this
3lOrds04 -8-
ordinance which is committed and continues from day-to-day, constitutes a separate offense for
each and every date during which such violation is committed or continued.
SECTION 11. Public Nuisance. Every place of business at or in which violations of
this ordinance, or any provision thereof occur is a public nuisance and as such the public
nuisance may be abated and/or enjoined from further operation.
SECTION 12. No person shall deny free access to an adult business for purposes of a
reasonable inspection to enforce compliance with building, fire, electrical, health or plumbing
regulations, of the City of Temecula or the State of California.
SECTION 13. Sevembility. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word
or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason held to be invalid, or unconstitutional by a court
of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have
adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or portion
thereof regardless of whether such other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
portion thereof regardless of whether such other section, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 14. The immediate effectiveness of this ordinance is necessary for public
health, safety and welfare in that uncontrolled operation of adult businesses may impact
negatively on the quality of urban life and therefore this ordinance shall be effective immediately
upon its adoption.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of October, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATFEST:
David F. Dixon, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Orlis04 -9-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, David F. Dixon, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Urgency Ordinance No. 90- was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the
City Council on the 9th day of October, 1990.
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
David F. Dixon, City Clerk
3/Orals04 -10-
ITEM NO.
17
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
DATE: October 9, 1990
SUBJECT: General Plan
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint two of its members to work
with the City Manager and members of the Planning Commission to interview
consultants for development of the City's general plan.
BACKGROUND: We have solicited requests for qualifications from a number
of firms. We will be setting up interviews during the next few weeks and I am
suggesting this interview panel be comprised of two City Council members, two
members of the Planning Commission, the Planning Director, Gary Thornhill and City
Manager David Dixon.
Therefore it is my recommendation that the City Council appoint two members of its
body to act as representatives on this interview panel.
ITEM
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER/~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
October 9, 1990
Team Building Workshop
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve staff recommendations which
includes the hiring of a facilitator and setting aside the weekend of November 9th, 10th and
11 th, 1990 for a team building workshop for the City Council.
BACKGROUND: Several weeks ago we discussed the opportunity of participating
in a team building workshop for the members of the City Council and the City Manager.
During my recent attendance at the ICMA conference, I had the opportunity to talk to Ted
Gabler, who has a consulting firm which specializes in these kinds of workshops. Ted has
been a City Manager in the past and has an outstanding reputation in the field of Public
Administration. After discussing the team building session with him, it seems to me that he
would fit our needs as a facilitator very well. His response was very positive and he was
delighted to be considered for this session.
I would recommend that the City Council set aside the weekend of November 9th, 10th and
11 th, to hold a team building workshop at a sit to be determined by the City Manager. The
cost associated with this activity does not require additional appropriations but can be derived
from existing budgeted funds. Ted Gabler's costs associated with his services would run
between $14,000 and $15,000. Not only will he facilitate the team building workshop, but
will also interview each member of the Council prior to the scheduled workshop.
In addition to the above mentioned team building workshop, the League of California Cities
has announced that they will be sponsoring a City Council/City Manager team workshop twice
during 1991. The following are the dates scheduled:
January 30 - February 1, 199 1 - UCLA Conference Center, Lake Arrowhead
May 16 - May 18, 1991 - Stanford Sierra Lodge, South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Report
October 9, 1990
Team Building Workshop
Page 2.
The costs associated with the League Conference is $3,600 for registration with additional
costs relating to transportation and other miscellaneous expenses. The League workshops
are very beneficial and I would strongly suggest that we schedule the time in either January
or May to be involved in their team workshops.
The City Council has an opportunity before the end of this calendar year to attend a team
building workshop led by Ted Gabler and also to consider a future leadership team workshop
sponsored by the League later in 1991. I would recommend that the City Council plan to
participate in both programs. The team building workshop in November is timely and is of
importance as it will be the start of many workshops that will not only include the City
Council but in the future will include the commissioners and staff members.
ITEM NO. 19
jec/AGD16652
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEETING DATE
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL
SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY
AUGUST 24, 1990
SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
ORDINANCE NO. 90- ESTABLISHING DECISION
MAKING AUTHORITY FOR SUBDIVISION AND LAND
USE APPLICATIONS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Ordinance No.
90- establishing decision making authority for Subdivision
and Land Use applications.
DISCUSSION: At the Joint City Council/Planning Commission
meeting on July 30, 1990, the City Council directed the City
Attorney to prepare an Ordinance establishing a clear line
of authority between the City Council and Planning
Commission with respect to the consideration of various
development applications.
The existing procedures were designed by the County of
Riverside in light of the very large number of development
applications that it had to process; consequently, a
significant number of decisions were delegated to the County
Planning Director and County Planning Commission. Adoption
of the proposed Ordinance will establish a clear line of
authority as to which development applications will be
approved solely by the City Council after recommendation by
the Planning Commission and those applications which will be
solely approved by the Planning Commission with right of
appeal to the City Council.
Proposed Ordinance No. 90- will amend Riverside County
Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use Code") and Ordinance No. 460
("Subdivision Use Code") which were adopted by the City of
Temecula pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04.
Section 1 of the proposed Ordinance contains a matrix which
clearly delineates the line of authority for the majority of
-1-
j ec/AGD16652
development applications that will come before the City.
Essentially, it provides that all non-residential
development in excess of 50,000 square feet shall be
approved by the Council with a recommendation from the
Planning Commission. Smaller projects could be approved by
the Commission, subject to an appeal to the Council.
Similarly, the cut-off between the Commission and Council
for residential subdivisions will be twenty acres and ten
acres for non-residential subdivisions.
Also, it should be noted that there will be heightened
review of subdivision extensions, where the original map was
approved by the County. Funding to provide for this review
will be provided through increased application fees for
extensions. (See, Section 1(8) and (9); Section 3.)
Finally, it should be noted that some of the applications
recommended for approval by the County Planning Commission
will be routed to the City Planning Commision for "receive
and file." (See, Section 7.)
Any interested party may appeal a final decision by the
Planning Commission to the City Council with the appropriate
appeal fee to be set by Resolution. However, the proposed
Ordinance provides that any member of the City Council may
appeal a decision by the Planning Commission without payment
of any fee for the appeal.
The proposed Ordinance further provides that any other
development application which is not addressed within the
Ordinance may be considered by the Planning Director who
thereafter may refer the matter to the appropriate reviewing
body pursuant to the classifications set forth in the
Ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
applications.
Full cost recovery for subdivision extension
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 90- .
-2-
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING DECISION
MAKING AUTHORITY FOR SUBDIVISION AND LAND
USE APPLICATIONS
WHEREAS, on December 1, 1989, the City of Temecula was established as a duly
organized municipal corporation of the State of California;
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, the City adopted certain portions
of the non-codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use
Code") and Ordinance No. 460 ("Subdivision Use Code") for the City of Temecula;
WHEREAS, both the Land Use Code and the Subdivision Code currently provide for
procedures for consideration of approval for various development applications. These land use
procedures were designed by the County of Riverside in light of the very large number of
development applications that it had to process; consequently, a significant number of
applications were delegated to the County Planning Director and County Planning Commission
for consideration;
WHEREAS, subsequent to the City's incorporation and pursuant to Section 2.06.010
of the Temecula Municipal Code, the City Council established the Temecula Planning
Commission which become effective on June 4, 1990;
WHEREAS, prior to June 4, 1990, the members of the Riverside County Planning
Commission and the Riverside County Planning Director served as members of the interim
Planning Agency for the City of Temecula pursuant to the City Ordinance No. 89-13; and,
WHEREAS, in recognition of the need for a smooth transition from the County to the
City, it is necessary for the efficient operation of the affairs of the City that the City Council
establish a clear line of authority for the review and approval process involving development
applications;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance No. 460, as adopted
by City Ordinance No. 90-04, are hereby amended to adopt the following development
application procedures:
SECTION 2. Where combined development applications are submitted for
consideration, to the extent any portion of the application would be considered for approval by
the highest reviewing body, as set forth in Section 1, then the entire combined application shall
3lOrds05 -1-
×
X
X
x
X
X
X
0
C; 0
("') c
0 0 ~> -~
~ ~ 0
· -+ 0 --.
< -+
.-~
0
(')m -~ --o
X) cll:) <
X
X
X
0 <
C')
0 0 > -~
~ ~ 0
-* 0
_. <
0 m ~<
--,
0
X
X
>(
q) o
C')
0 0 > ~-
~6.<~
m -<
-H
o
0
-+
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
x
)<
0
n 0
X
X
×
X
×
--, >
X
>C X
X
0 -. -n
G '-+ 0
~< 0 · -<
.-~
0
be considered by the reviewing body. For example, a combined application for a parcel map
under twenty (20) acres and a proposed zone change shall be considered for approval by the City
Council as all applications for proposed zone changes are considered for approval by the City
Council as provided by law, notwithstanding the Planning Commission's authority to approve
parcel maps under (20) acres.
SECTION 3. Any application for extension of an approved tentative map, parcel map,
or vesting tentative map considered in accordance with the procedures contained at Section 1 (8)
or (9), above, shall pay the same fee as if the application were for the original map approval.
SECTION 4. Any interested person may file an appeal to a final decision by the
Planning Commission to the City Council. Together with the applicable filing fee established
by Resolution of the City Council, such appeal must be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10)
days of the date the matter was decided by the Planning Commission. For purposes of this
Section, any City Council member may appeal a decision by the Planning Commission without
payment of any fee for the appeal.
SECTION 5. Except as otherwise provided therein, any other land division or
development application may be submitted to the City Planning Director for approval. If the
Planning Director determines that the proposed application is comparable to one of the approvals
described in Section 1, he shall direct that such application be submitted to either the Planning
Commission or City Council for consideration pursuant to the procedures set forth at Section 1.
SECTION 6. To the extent the provisions of Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460 are not
superseded by the provisions of this City Ordinance, including notice and heating requirements,
said remaining provisions shall remain effective.
SECTION 7. City Ordinance No. 89-13 provided that all recommendations made by the
Riverside County Planning Director or County Planning Commission were not final until they
had been accepted by the City Council. For those matters which were reviewed by the Riverside
County Planning Director or Commission but which have not yet appeared on the City Council
Agenda as of the effective date of this Ordinance, such matters shall be placed on either the
planning Commission Agenda or the City Council Agenda to be accepted or set for public
hearing and approval, conditional approval or denial in accordance with the classifications of
Section 1.
SECTION 8. The City Council determines that it is necessary for the protection and
preservation of the public peace, health, safety and general welfare, that this Ordinance be
adopted as an Urgency Ordinance and that the same take effect immediately upon its adoption.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by law.
SECTION 10. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
3lOrds05 -2-
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION 11. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of
this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of October, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
David F. Dixon, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Ords05 -3-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, David F. Dixon, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Urgency Ordinance No. 90- was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the
City Council on the 9th day of October, 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
David F. Dixon, City Clerk
3/Ords05 4-
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
CSD BUSINESS
1.
A GENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
A REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 9, 1990 PM
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of September 18, 1990, as mailed.
1.2 Approve the minutes of September 25, 1990, as mailed.
Renewal of Landscaping Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve recommendations contained in the staff report.
Cancellation of the Regular CSD Meeting of October 23, 1990
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve cancellation of the CSD Meeting scheduled for October
23, 1990.
MANAGERS REPORT
DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting:
November 13, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol street, Temecula, California
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order
at 8:05 PM, President Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June
S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Fred Laspesa, 29751 Dawncrest Circle, spoke regarding the landscape maintenance
of the Woodcrest Country Tract. He recommended that East Brothers, the contractor
for these services, provide a checklist of specific tasks performed weekly. He said
some improvements have been made, however there are still areas which need
attention.
CSD BUSINESS
1. Appeal Procedures - CSD Rates and Charges
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to approve
minutes of August 14, 1990 and August 28, 1990 as mailed.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
4\CSDMIN\O91890 -1- 09/25/90
CSD Minutes
2.
September 18, 1990
Annexation of Tract 23992, Bedford Apartments to TCSD Zone A
Director Parks moved, Director Moore seconded a motion to approve
annexation of Tract 23992, Bedford Apartments to TCSD Zone A.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Annexation of Parcel Map No. 23430, Bedford Properties
It was moved by Director Mu~oz, seconded by Director Parks to approve
annexation of Parcel Map No. 23430, Bedford Properties to TCSD Zone A.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
CITY MANAGERS REPORT
City Manager Dixon reported Shawn Nelson has been appointed as the Parks and
Recreation Director and will begin October 1, 1990.
CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT
None given.
4\CSDMIN\091890 -2- 09/25/90
CSD Minutes September 18, 1990
DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Mu~oz asked staff to discuss with Bedford Properties, the City obtaining the
lights on the median on the Rancho California overpass. Director Parks asked that this
be amended to include the dedication of median landscaping on the Rancho California
Road overpass.
Director Parks asked that the agreement between CSA-143 and the School District
for Joint Use of Facilities be activated to allow for public use of school gyms during
the evening hours.
President Birdsall asked about the status of the Sam Hicks Park dedication. City
Manager Dixon said he would bring back a report on this issue.
Director Mu~oz asked when the medians in front of the Target Center would be
landscaped?
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to adjourn at 9:35 PM
to a meeting on September 25, 1990 at 8:00 PM at the Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
4\CSDMIN\091890 -3- 09/25/90
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD SEPTEMBER 25, 1990, 1990
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order
at 8:10 PM, President Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were Acting City Manager Rick Sayre, City Attorney Scott F. Field and
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CSD BUSINESS
President Birdsall stated there is no regular business on the agenda tonight. She
announced the new Parks and Recreation Director, Shawn Nelson will begin Monday,
October 1, 1990.
CITY MANAGERS REPORT
Rick Sayre reported that the weeds in front of the Target Center would be cleaned up
this week.
CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
Councilmember Mu~oz asked the status of constructing shade shelters at the Sports
Park Tot Lot.
Councilmember Lindemans reported that the first bid for this project has come in at
925,000 and staff is awaiting further bids.
Mayor Parks asked Councilmembers to contact the City Clerk and get the issues
4\CSbMIN\O82590 - 1 - 10/01/90
CSD Minutes September 25, 1990
needing attention brought forward when they note an agenda with time available.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Moore to adjourn at 8:15
PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
4\CSDMtN\082590 o2- 10/01/90
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
Temecula Community Services District Board
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager
October 9, 1990
Cancellation of meeting of October 23, 1990
PREPARED BY: Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the cancellation of the Regular Community Services
District meeting of October 23, 1990.
BACKGROUND: The League of California Cities 92nd Annual Conference is
scheduled for October 21 24, 1990. Four members of the City Council have
indicated they will be attending this conference, therefore, a quorum will not be
available on October 23, 1990.
ITEM NO. 3
Riverside County Service Area '143
JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR
29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 105 - Temecula, CA 92390
[7~4) 699-0235
Fax: [714) 699-4390
October 3, 1990
Temecula Community Service District Board of Directors
Temecula Community Service District
P. O. Box 3000
Temecula, California 92390
Dear Board Members:
As requested, following is a recommendation on the acceptance of the
Landscaping Contract with East Brothers Landscape for slope and
streetscape maintenance on several Temecula Community Service District
dedicated areas within the city.
Our recommendation is to not approve East Brother's Landscape
Contract for these dedicated areas. (See attached staff report.) We
are recommending this after monthly (weekly in the last month) staff
evaluations and several walk throughs with East Brother's maintenance
supervisor, a resident of the Woodcrest Development and CSA 143 staff.
After no improvement in some areas to little improvement in others, we
have come to this final conclusion. The evaluation reports are
available for review upon request.
We recommend the landscape contractor you approved (McKenzie
Landscaping) to take over the maintenance of the areas now being
maintained by East Brothers. The bid will be according to the
original approved proposal.
Very truly yours,
Jeanine R. Overson CSA 143
JRO/j
Enclosures
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL LETTER
COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
DAIE
October 3. 1990
TO:
Jeanine R. Overson. CSA 143 Director
FROM
Robert M. Kast. Senior Facilities Caretaker ~___, ~ "' - '
--~ ' <..~._ ;.~,~._ ""~
SUBJECT:
East Brothers Maintenance Contract
CSA Staff has reviewed previous monthly evaluations of East Brothers
Landscape and Staff recommends not renewing the maintenance contract for
areas in the City of Temecula. The Landscape Contractor has not performed
to the high standards set forth by CSA 143.
CSA Staff feels it would be in the best interest of the community to change
Landscape Contractors. The goal of CSA 143 is to have the best maintained
landscaped areas in Riverside County. CSA Staff recommends MacKenzie
Landscape take over maintenance of the areas now maintained by East
Brothers.
'2~80 Washington Street, 92504-4698
P,O, Box 1259, Riverslde, CA 92502-1259
(714) 275-4937 · FAX (71,1) 369-9244
'jc 08-j B--U9
I,
.'; .... ,. '--.;dotatlof~
(S ..~; E1 H~quest for
_ Proposal tt
' ;~;.;...j,(; ..'
Closing Date _.S a,u l:__1.5 ,_j.3.13.~:30 P.M.
13 uyer_. K a r o l i ........ Phone _2.7._eL_t493
I_rJ.s. Ln.!?_cl_J_o rj_s
pro.Ounlificellor! -- Urtlol;~ 61alorl elsewhere lr lift¶ document. you nmfi fill o.I 8cd Iolu~n with your In~ponao tim nll~ched r'to qunliflcnllonNondo~ lnfoHn~llon
~: fd I~ ~;~[ir, ed, It no loire I$ enclos.,J of Ihgt9 BIg no oilier [-,) qHnllrlcnllon leq.hon~Onl9 slalod elsewJlnl~ In Ihi~ d,)Cumor,l. you may assume you 6re pre~unlill~d.
II. Pdco~HolBIIons · All pHcodnolollons mugl be lypew,illen or wrillen In l.k llo o/nsu~os poredlied. M~slaNos shnll be cru~sed oul, Co.0clio. S mBde adjacent Bnd
~[~160 ~ ~On ~ignlng documenl E~ch Ilom ~h~ll be bid ~opot~l.l/
Ill. ~rmDt -- Use Iho documenl9 p~ovIded. 1I you decide 1o subroll more thnn one bid, pholocopy our documnnls.
IV. P~'Torln~ra~ -- All l~rTch~g shell bo re [], our dock, n~{ J~}~f~ {e.g , cnsh term~ le. IhRn 20 dnys ~hou~d be considered not} 0xcluding eppllcebto I~x, ] he
I I
~ ~]~on~ asn os lax end IS exempl hem Federal'excise lax. In Iho eveul of en exlenslon o-eL Iho Unit pdce 6hall prevail.
V. OIher hrms Bed ~nditions ~ The Ie~rTis 6nd conditions R~ Indlcnlnd on Ihe reverse side el this documenl Red/or allached are 8 pnd el Ibis documenI end shell ~iTly
Vl. ~IF~Zi~TFUnlo~s sIalod othe~lse elsewhere In Ihl~ documonl, pHco9 9hell be Ihm Ior 45 d~ys after Ihe closing dole.
VII. ~~lia~j~9 -- Whir.vet brand no,no~ 6~e usqd, lhe words "or equnl" sh~, be considered 1o op mar end be e pod o[ the spocltlcetlon. II ~u ere quoting
~nolI~F~o~ ~1, c~o~ ouI ou~ nonrnonc~aluro ~nd Insert ynuts. I[ no mn~e or mode/I~ slipdated, In~ert )'ours AUnch npplic~blo specfficnllons Redlot brochures.
VedalionS In m~nulachrrors, deSlgn, olc, ruby be acceptable. biddais me e.coumgod Io oUer Ihem e9 aileronfives; however, Ihe ~unly eeso~e9 Ihe righi Io ~oJecl
Ihose elternellvos R9 non responsNe.
The ~unly recognize9 Ih6t pdcos ere onty ono o[ 6ovo~nl crlloda Io be used In Judging 8n of Io~
and Ihe ~unly I~ not legally ~und Io eccedl Ihe Iowesl o.er.
IX. Closln Dale/Return To -- 1he bld ~esponse eholl be delivered Io II~o ~ddro. nbove by 1:30 pro. on Iho cbslng dale Ilslnd libeve. The closl.g dale 6nd lime end
~.~.~ ~.r.E'~U~Eor reIeronced nbove ehnll appear on Iho etAside ot Ihe seared envelope,
X. Muir Pelt BId Shoals -- Return 811 three copies, with your company norno printed on Ihe lop el Inch pete.
XI.
.Deliver To/~dre~;s .~ ProducI.Jservlce8 bid shell be delivered Io .....
TIlE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE PART OF TIlE ItFQ/P
X] Plequ~llllCntlOn Form [,1 Oenerel Conditions Equipment (~ Appendix A'
13 SpoCi~l ~ndillon~ RrO r~Oone~nl ~ndillons. Malerlal$ &SIlicas El Bid Shoot Equlpmgnl
[.I General ~ndlllons I ~Geno,~l ~ndillons RFP D 8amplo~
REFER ALL INQUIRIES 70 BID SECTION ~
lIEN UNIT
NO. QUANH~ UUlT DESCRIPTION EXTENSION
PDICE
,V I":
.::: Landscape maintenance seEvices as per
4) "":~1 the attached appendix A
. .!..
(Note:'~'.;~,"'if tl~e area described here.t~ is
-qdV0~CINV"I~]ZNDDVIz,-tnco~p0'~.~:ed .tnLo..,a city, the County
reserves the ~ight' to,'. 'dance]. t. he
.... ;"
hereof II cltllliclllon Ihll Ihl Ur~:Jlrllgned f,II PIed led Under!llndl lhl fermi TOTAL
led condllionl hereof, end Ihel Ihe underelgn~J'l prln<lpel II fully ~und led commitled."
SLATE ' -,
lie B
GALES TAX
TRANSPORTATION CHAtleE
IF APPLICABLE
CAStl DISCOUNT_
IrnOu rlECEII'I OF GOODS O/'1 It/VOiCE, WIIICttl~vE/1 IS LAIER )
C.,A~tl lEftMS I.l,qS IH&H ~ DAY~ W1LI. lIE I:X)NIIOEIIE0 NEll
Cash dlscoUnl Ihell be applied Io gtlind lotill amount.
DELIVERY:
calendar dey~ tiller receJpl of ordec
Mai~tc~a~cc
Bid Form
l<~vt:rside
L2ounty
Service Area 143
l{a~cho Callformula
'Ihtsutni & Fatt~mt~
Na.,e of l'r.ject :Winches. ter Creek
Name .[ Bidder : HacKenzie Landscape,
Retur. to : Karen Bauer-HcNeaJ~ Date Due
item I Descriptlo.
1. Slopes-Pla.ttng
2. S1 epes~J rri ga t i on
3. Turf
4. Turf-irrigation
I
Tract No-
A California Corporation
:9/15/89
146,295 s. f,
IF
843 s g
:20130
Due : 1: 30pro
per Mo,tth
.009 $1,324.00
Totnl Bid CosUMo.th (this Imrcel/Irnct) $1,324.00
Disclaimer: I he u.lts 8.d unit q.antllie~ provlded above are fo~ u|po~es of un form bids only.= Aculal u.lt~ P, nd u.R qur~rllille9/Ire .i
Al~pe,~dix"B", Proj~_cL _2_~ PaFcel/l'ract 20130
ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND I(EIMBUI(SABLE EXI'Ir~NSIES
All l, lanl m:,le,'ial removal or ~'rl,lace.,cnt sh:dl be accon~lfilshed only ~'ith Ihe nltproval or the Rlvc,-slde
County Service Area ld3.
'Ihe La**dscape Mah,lemmce Cont,'ach~r sh:fil fur,fish the i(lverslde County Se~3'lce Area 143 n'ilh
ilemlzcd cstimale [.r a.y extra work xcquh cd. lle shall not proceed Mlhout nulhoHz~fihm h'om the
Rh'erside County Service M'ca 143.
Addillonnl phmling, re,.oval or replaccmt,~t or lfianll.g shall be charged qt $ see below cr
p hour
plus materials at the Co,flractor's cost l~rlce.
llou,'ly H~le for mlscellnncous ext,'a srt'n'lces shall be $see below per hour.
blnjor h-rlgnlhm setwlclng for dan,nge c:t.scd I,y nets or God. theft or vnndnlls,n shrill l,e clmrgcd nt
$ see below pc,' Imur, plus materials at tl,e Co,flrnctor's cost p.'lce.
Any nddltio,ml charges l,resenled h, the Rh'erslde Cou,tb' Service Area 143 slmll inchide the folhm'Ing
hfforlnathHl:
a,
d.
COMMENTS:
Itemized detailed description of tasks involved.
Names of parties (or persons) l~crrormi.g the work.
Copy of Riverside County Service Area 143 authorizatlon to do work.
Receipts for material costs..
Labor
Rates for all exLra work:
Labor with hal~d tools:
Foreman with pick-up truck and
hand tools:
Haterials:
$15.00 / hour
30.00 / l~our
cosb plus 15%
a. 'i .C.'..'. ~ :.,:;-,:: . . . . . . .,.. ... .z ~.;h'; ','.... ,.,'.",:: · ~ ,~>.:..-';.
"'~. 'i
~' ~'~.','.' "=,;,',,'.'..~ ~l--
>
r_2,
m
o
m
-o
I.,
h-
3:
~o~
~mB ~
.~m~z
>'o~
z~zm