Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
081490 CC Agenda
Invocation Flag Salute Pastor T. 3. Netcar Rancho Co~munityChurch Birdsall, Linde~ns, Moore, Parks Nufioz, , 1990 Proclamation - Energy AWareness !~onth - October 1990. ~_I-~TC commas & total of 15minutes is providedsome m bars of thepubliccan address the Council on items that are not listed on the A~enda. Speakers are limited t0 two (2) minutes each, If you desire to speak to the Council about anit~a'notlistedonthe Agenda, a pink "le~uest ~ Speaks form should be filled out end filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and ~tate · For all other agenda"items a "~uest ~ Sl~ak" form must be -filed with the City Clerk ]~or~ the Council gets to that .item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual / IYeTC"ITO ~ FTI~.T9 tll matters listed undsr,QtBCsn~ ,f~eOt~V are considered to be routine and ' City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 2 RECOIg(BNDATION 1.1 Notion to valve the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. RECOMMENDATION: .1 2.2 2.3 Approve the minutes of ~uly 24, 1990 as mailed. Approve the minutes of ~uly 30, 1990 as mailed. Approve the minutes of ~uly 31, 1990 as mailed. ~TION: 3.1 Adopt a =esolutiOn entitled: · l RBBOLUTZON OF TItS CITY COUNCIL OF TKB CiTY OF $r~)itfZie 'fill llZ4)O3kTZOII OF THB 11~31~"1 $YITBMJ DITZBZON 4 5.1 Deny the claim for damages s~df. ,I$/P &14~l~ 2 11.1 klopt a resolution entitledz ~XOI NO. 90- a IigOLU,/':IOll OF ~ GI~Z COUNCIL OF M&Oe/Be elOPe?IS eLMIS DD DBMI~I~S BZ~IIXT 12 xn ~lts-~ Ccm~'ro~ &ura4ment RF~O~k~aelNtTION 12.1 Authorize the City Nanager to enter Into an agreement vlth the County of RIverside to provide Animal Control Services in the City of Temecula for one year. 13 ItBC~e~NDATION 13.1 Authorize the City NanaVer to enter into a cooperative agreement vtth-the County of RIverside to participate in the Urban County Program. 14 15 ~=~r~tene.!gq Of T4I' fo? Veet4n~ Ten~attvw T~pct :No. 15. 1 Set for Public Hearing on AmpJet 28, 1990, 4 ONtOtoO ,I . 2X. X bad by title entitled',: only and introduce an ordinance ORDZMiNCl JlO. 90- 22 n~V~ty~Mnt Ae[efr,ent. Froced-re. RECOMMEHDATI ON: 22.1 Approve a resolution entitled: RISOLUTZOI NO. 90- & ~oll OF-~ cxTr eou~xL OF. fib ex~-f OF ,TaBCULl 23 Control A~reeaent for Mesa Homes: 'T~acts 24131, ~413~, li~I~,FX ON: 23.1 Approve the Flood Control Agreement between Mesa Has the XiversLde County-Flood Control Dtstrlct and the City of Teaecula 23.2 Approve the MaoFandum of Understanding between Mesa Hoses and the City of Taecula 23,3 Authorize the Mayor to execute the same. Study Boleion: August 21, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Center, 28816 Pu:Jol' Street, Temeeule, CaltfoFnta NeXt xlgelar aeetLng: August 28, 1990, 7:00 PX, Temecula Colmmlity Center, 28816 PuJol Street, Teaecula, California cosmunit ~RIVERSIDE COUNTYel/7 DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH!;; TO: Mayors, City Councils, Law Enforcement, School Superintendents, School Board Members, Chambers of Commerce, Churches, Service ClUbs, Community Organizations and Community Members. The Riverside County Drug Abuse Program is sponsoring. the Fifth Annual Riverside County RED RIBBON WEEK Campaign, October 21-28, 1990, to encourage the citizens of Riverside County to demonstrate their commit- ment to healthy, drug-free lifestyles, and to unite the communities in their efforts to eliminate the demand for illicit drugs. The objective of "RED RIBBON WEEK" is to wear a red ribbon or display one at home, business, school, church, etc., to signify a united commitment to win the war on drugs and to promote healthy, drug-free lifestyles. The theme of this year's campaign is: "MY CHOICE, DRUG-FREE." As community leaders, your participation in this campaign is invaluable. Drug abuse is a community problem with no community left untouched. Solutions to drug abuse must ultimately come from the community itself. The RED RIBBON WEEK Campaign provides a setting in which all segments of the community can come together to stand against drug abuse and to promote healthy lifestyles. The campaign provides a framework in which a great variety of activities can be presented to heighten public aware- ness and local participation in prevention efforts. Last year, the RED RIBBON Campaign received tremendous support in the ty Ri id ' ti ip thi year' Coun of vers e ................... We an c ate that s s campaign will have even greater energy and impact| Attached is a newsletter published by our agency which contains RED RIBBON WEEK information, including a sample proclamation and pledge cards. Please feel free to contact Carol Mills at (714) 275-2131 if you have questions or would like more information about the campaign or RED RIBBON WEEK planning in your area. We look forward to your support|! Sincerely, Carol Addiss, Program Manager Riverside County Drug Abuse Program PROCLAMATION A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse has reached epidemic stages in the United States; and WHEREAS, it is imperative that community members launch visible substance abuse prevention education efforts to reduce the demand for drugs; and WHEREAS, Californians For Drug-Free Youth, Inc. is coordinating the California Red Ribbon Campaign in cooperation with the National Red Ribbon Campaign to offer our citizens the opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to drug-free and alcohol abuse-free lifestyles; and WHEREAS, the Red Ribbon Campaign will be celebrated in every community in America during "RED RIBBON WEEK", October 21-28, 1990; and WHEREAS, President Bush and Mrs. Bush are the National Honorary Chairpersons, and Governor Deukmejian and Mrs. Deukmejian are California's Honorary Chairpersons to provide this community focus on a DRUG FREE AMERICA; and WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service organizations, youth, medical, senior citizens, military, sports teams, and individuals will demonstrate their commitment to drug-free and alcohol abuse-free, healthy lifestyles by wearing and displaying red ribbons during this week- long campaign; and WHEREAS, the community of Temecula further commits its resources to ensure the success of the RED RIBBON CAMPAIGN; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby support October 21-28, 1990 as RED RIBBON WEEK, and encourages its citizens t o participate in drug prevention education activities, making a visible statement that we are firmly committed to a drug-free and, alcohol abuse-free community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula encourages all citizens to pledge: "NO USE OF ILLEGAL DRUGS AND NO ILLEGAL USE OF LEGAL DRUGS!" Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA--THE RESOURCES ACvENCY CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMJ~ISSION CHARLES R, IMBRECHT ,"hairman GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor July 16, 1990 Dear Mayor: October is Californiats EnergyAwareness Month. The energy industry is the largest single sector in the state, contributing $75 billion to the economy in 1989. To inform all state residents of the meaning of this special month and to gain recognition at both city and county levels, we are enclosing a copy of Governor George Deukmejiants official proclamation. We encourage your participation in events related to Energy Awareness Month, and hope that you will issue a local proclamation or resolution to that effect. If we receive a copy of your document by August 15, 1990, we will include it in press kits targeted to local media outlets. Your original document will be on display at the C'alifornia Energy Commission during Energy Awareness Month. Any questions regarding related activities should be directed to: Bob Aldrich Public Information Officer California Energy Commission 1516 - 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 Thank you for your interest and assistance in this cooperative effort. · Enclosure 1516 Ninth Street, Sacramento, Califomia 95814 (916) 324-3326 PROCLAMATION A PROCLAMA T/ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA WHEREAS, the City of Temecula is one of the newest cities in the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula is considered to be one of the rapidly growing areas of Riverside County; and WHEREAS, California is a world economic force and is the fifth largest consumer of energy; and WHEREAS, being among the largest economic sectors in the state, the energy industry contributed $75 billion to the overall state economy in 1989 alone; and WHEREAS, California ranks third in gasoline consumption attributed to vehicles, behind only the entire United States and the Soviet Union; and WHEREAS, energy as a consumer commodity in its varied forms -- electricity, natural gas, fossil and petroleum-based fuels, solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and cogeneration -- affects consumers throughout our state; and WHEREAS, California leads the nation in developing and implement conservation programs, alternative transportation fuels demonstrations, energy security contingency planning methods and research pertaining to renewable and alternative energy resources and technologies; and WHEREAS, the California Energy Commission, as the state's designated principal energy planning agency, is responsible for ensuring a reliable supply of energy consistent with protecting the environment and enhancing our economy; NOW, THEREFORE, I, RONALD J. PARKS, Mayor of the City of Temecula, do hereby proclaim October 1990 as Energy Awareness Month in Temecula, and encourage use at all related events of the theme, "Using Energy Wisely -- There's Never Enough to Waste." I also urge all citizens to increase their awareness and knowledge of wise and efficient ways to use the varied forms of energy available to them. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed on this 14th day of August, 1990. Ronald J. Parks Mayor June S. Greek Deputy City Clerk MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD JULY 24t 1990 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:00 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor David Wall, Trinity Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Muffoz. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Parks Proclaimed August 15, 1990, Temecula Day At De1 Mar. PUBLIC COMMENTS Nancy Maurice, P.O. Box 573, spoke regarding the recent comments in the press made by Councilmember Lindemans about Sam Hicks, and the practice of naming parks after individuals in the community. She said she feels he showed little feeling for the history and roots of this community. A group of about 20 people stood to show their support for naming streets, buildings or parks after individuals who have made outstanding contributions to the community. Theresa Bell, 25057 Parkcrest Drive, Murrieta, voiced her disapproval of the comments of Councilmember Lindemans regarding her grandfather, Sam Hicks. She stated his treatment of this issue has been very painful to the family. Allan McDonald, 43466 Manzano Drive, representing the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, asked the City Council to accept the deed to Sam Hicks Monument Park with the current conditions of permanently retaining the land as park land and as an important historical monument, and also preserving the name Sam Hicks Monument Park. Hi nutes\7%2~,\90 - 1 - 08/08/90 CitV Council Minutes July 24. 1990 James Marple, 28541 Via Princesa, distributed a package to the Council outlining an on-site water retention program. He stated this would avoid urban runoff problems, and is a health and safety concern for the City. He asked the Council to examine the plans of new projects and condition them to include an on-site water retention program. He advised the Council of an upcoming Murrieta Creek Advisory Council meeting. Doug Blois, 30350 Tradewater Ct., stated the citizens of Temecula voted for incorporation because the County of Riverside was not addressing the needs of the citizens. He asked the Council to review items even those previously approved by the County, and hold public hearings if needed. He stressed the need for managed growth. He stated it is not fair to put a moratorium only on apartments. Jim A11mon, 43954 Gatewood Way, stated the City needs to put the development of a general plan on a fast track, as it is vitally important to upcoming projects and plans for the City. Councilmember Mu~oz stated he felt the treatment of Councilmember Lindemans has been a little harsh. He expressed his feeling that Councilmember Lindemans had no intention of hurting anyone by his remarks. CONSENT CALENDAR Staff requested the removal of Item No. 14 which was previously approved by the Council from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Lindemans stated if this were being voted upon, he would abstain due to a conflict of interest. Councilmember Moore said she would be abstaining from Item 6 and 7 due to a possible conflict of interest. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-13, and 15-17 with Councilmember Moore abstaining on Items 6 and 7 as follows: 1. Minutes 1.1 Approved the minutes of July 3, 1990 as corrected. 1.2 Approved the minutes of July 7, 1990 as mailed. 1.3 Approved the minutes of July 10, 1990 as mailed. II i nutes\7%2~\90 - 2 - 08/08/90 City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 City Treasurer's Report for the Month Ending June 30, 1990 2.1 Received and filed. Resolution aDproving Pa3rment of Demands 3.1 Approved a resolutionentitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EYNIBIT A. Sales and Use Tax Analysis and Reporting Agreement 4.1 Approved an agreement to provide sales tax analysis and monthly sales tax reports. 4.2 Adopted a resolution authorizing access to sales and use tax records entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO SALES ANDUSE TAX RECORDS PURSUANT TO REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE SECTION 7056 Claim for Damages - Harrison vs The City of Temecula 5.1 Denied the Claim for Damages. Final Tract Map 23371-3 6.1 Approved Final Vesting Tract Map 23371-3 subject to the conditions of approval. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz, Parks None None Moore !li nutes\/~24\90 -3 - 08/08/90 City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 Final Vesting Tract 23371-4 7.1 Approved Final Vesting Tract Map 23371-4 subject to the conditions of approval. 10. 11. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Final Parcel MaD 22886 Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks None None Moore Lindemans, Approved Final Parcel Map 22886 subject to the conditions 8.1 of approval. Final Tract Map 23100-3 9.1 Approved Final Tract Map 23100-3, subject to the conditions of approval. ICMA Deferred Compensation Program 10.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION 90-50 ESTABLISHING AM EMPLOYEE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN TO BE ADMINISTERED BY ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION Street Name Chanae - Kathleen Way to Ridqe Park Drive 11.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME OF KATHLEEN WAY TO RIDGE PARK DRIVE. Mirva~\~4\90 -~- 08/08/90 City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 3. 5e Resolution Providina for the Enforcement of State Laws and Regulations Relating to Public Health 12.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH Temecula Capital Improvement Corporation - City Hall Facility Financing 13.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FORMATION OF A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION TO FACILITATE THE FINANCING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA; DETERMINING THAT THE FORMATION OF SAID CORPORATION AND THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS, NOTES OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS BY 8AID CORPORATION TO FINANCE THE COSTS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BENEFIT AND USE OF THE CITY WILL CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC PURPOSE; APPOINTING THE INITIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SAID CORPORATION; APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE FORMATION OF THE CORPORATION; AND REQUIRING APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS, NOTES OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS BY THE CORPORATION. Plot Plan No. 2 15.1 Set for Public Hearing on July 31, 1990. Curfew for Minors Ordinance (Second Reading) 16.1 Read by title only, waived further reading and adopted an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 11.10 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CURFEW FOR MINORS 14 i nutes\7~2/,\90 - 5 - 08/08/90 -_ City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 17. Cable Television Franchise Ordinance {Second Reading} 17.1 Read by title only, waived further reading and adopted an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-12 AN ORDiNANCE OF THE CITY CODI~CIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~rLA GOVERNING CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISES HEREINAFTER GRANTED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufoz, Parks COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCIL BUSINESS 18. Weed Abatement - Approval of Charges City Manager Dixon reported that at their last meeting the City Council directed staff to proceed with abatement procedures for properties presented by the Fire Department. He said at this time a resolution to place an assessment against these properties for weed abatement should be adopted. Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COST OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WEEDS. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Ni nutes\7%2z,\90 -6- 08/08/90 City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 9e Tentative Tract 21067, Third Extension of Time Staff reviewed several alternative recommendations and suggested continuing this item until later in the meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue Item No. 19 until later in the meeting. The motion was unanimously carried. 20. Animal Control - Dog License Amnesty Program 21. Joe Hreha, Manager of Information Systems, recommended approving a 60-day dog license late fee amnesty program. He explained that many citizens believe the dog licensing program has just begun and are not aware the program has been on-going by the County of Riverside. He stated the City will publish an ad in the newspaper to educate the public regarding the program. He said the increase in new licenses should off-set any fees lost in late charges. Councilmember Mufioz suggested making the amnesty program 90- days instead of 60-days because many people will first learn about the program when the ad is published. This extra time will give all citizens ample time to purchase dog licenses. Councilmember Moore requested the notice include a picture of a dog, or something graphic that will attract the public's attention. Councilmember Mufioz moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to approve a 90-day dog license late fee amnesty program. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Copier Purchase Authorization City Manager Dixon recommended continuing this item to the meeting of August 14, 1990 to allow staff to present an expanded report. M i nutes\7~/,\90 - 7- 08/08/90 City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 Charlie Okamato, representing Eastman Kodak Company, made a commitment to the Council to provide the best service possible and meet the needs of the City now and in the future. Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion to continue Item No. 21, Copier Purchase Authorization, to the meeting of August 14, 1990. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None RECESS Mayor Parks declared a recess at 8:05 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the CSD Meeting at 10:20 PM. 19. Tentative Tract 21067, Third Extension of Time City Attorney Fields recommended setting this item for Public Hearing on August 14, 1990. He stated staff will be recommends that the Tract Map be approved subject to the condition that a traffic study be performed, and mitigation fees charged on a pro-rata, fair share basis, as determined by the traffic study. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to set for Public Hearing on August 14, 1990. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None POBLIC HEARING 22. Change of Zone 5563, Conditional Use Permit 3042 Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, stated this is a request by Arco Products for a change of zone and approval of CUP 3042. 14 i nutes~7%24\90 - 8 - 08/08/90 _~ City Council Minutes July 24, 1990 Me said the change of zone is for an AM-PM Mini Mart. He said this proposal is consistent with SWAP and staff recommends further conditions as follows: 22.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for County Environmental Assessment No. 34180 based on the findings incorporated in the Initial Study, and the conclusion that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 22.2 Deny Change of Zone Request No. 5563 from R-R to C- 1/CP in accordance with the findings contained in the staff report, but 22.3 Approve Change of Zone No. 5563 from R-R to C-P-S in accordance with findings contained in the staff report as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 90-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 5563, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM 4-4 (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO CPS (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 79. 22.4 Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 3042 based on the attached findings and subject to the attached conditions of approval. Councilmember Mufioz asked if this zoning permits high profile signs. Mr. Thornfield stated he would check into the code at the break and report back with an answer. Councilmember Lindemans objected to the condition that no single containers of beer could be purchased. Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 10:25 PM. Lou Boemia, Applicant stated for the most part he concurs with the staff report and said this project is scheduled to begin construction next month, to open in December of this year. He said on Planning condition number five, he wanted to confirm his conversation with The Planning Department that the N i nutes\1%2/,\90 - 9 - 08/08/90 f~ City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 front fascia on the canopy is permitted but must not be illuminated. He said on Planning condition number two, a five foot planter is suggested adjacent to the building, and he requested a three foot planter to allow room for a sidewalk. He also confirmed Arco did not have a problem with the request to install more parking spaces even though they are not required by the code. Mr. Boemia requested that Planning condition number three, that no single containers of beer may be sold, be deleted. On Item No. 20, he asked the reasoning for this condition requiring driveways to be 8" thick rather than the standard He asked that Condition Nos. 23 and 24, regarding signalization at the Intersection of Hwy 79 and Margarita be deleted. He stated the County is under contract with Ranpac who has completed the design for the signalization of the intersection. He stated that per Condition No. 21, a traffic signal mitigation fee must be paid. On Condition No. 28, "no left turn in or out of site except as shown or allowed, he stated that the only left turn is from Dartola Road. Councilmember MuAoz asked when the traffic signal would be installed. Mr. Boenia responded that the signal would go in after the completion of the project. He said the designs for the light are 90% complete. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, stated he would like the signals in place at the time of occupancy of the project. Larry Markum, representing the applicant, stated the problem is this signal is part of the County's package of six signals that are currently in design. The funding is available for them, via the signal mitigation fund. He asked the Council's assistance in getting the County to proceed. Councilmember Lindemans asked if the City could fund the traffic signal, install it, and seek reimbursement at a later date, to insure a safe intersection. Mayor Parks declared a one minute break at 10:40 P.M. to change the tape. The meeting resumed at 10:41 P.M. Hi nutes\7%24\90 - 1 O- 08/08/90 .... City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 It was movedby Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to extend the meeting to 11:00 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. 22. (Cont.) Mayor Parks suggested conditioning the project by requiring left-turn pockets into the project. Councilmember Mu~oz asked the applicant what signage was planned for the project. Mr. Boenia stated the signage is the low monument sign, approximately three feet high. Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, stated three foot planters would be acceptable. He said that on planning condition number three, staff did not have strong feelings regarding this condition. He concurred with the applicant the it had been agreed that the front fascia panel would be allowed, however it shall not be illuminated. Mr. Thornhill stated the zoning allowed up to a 20 foot sign. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, addressed Engineering Condition No. 20. He stated the condition could be changed to read, "driveways shall conform to commercial driveway standards". He said according to the applicant's traffic study, with the project in place, the current recommendation would stand. He referred to the traffic engineer for questions. Clyde Sweet, Traffic Engineer, stated according to the study, a traffic signal is not warranted at this time. Mayor Parks asked if left turn pockets are warranted. He stated this is the general rule. Councilmember Lindemans requested the left-turn lanes be extra long to allow for Camper and Motorhome traffic from the nearby campgrounds. City Manager Dixon reported that Highway 79 is a State Highway and as a result any improvements must be coordinated with CalTrans. He stated he has met with CalTrans and they plan to move quickly on these improvements. Mr. Dixon stated we should see these improvements in approximately one year. He said if this were a City street, the City could move more quickly, but on a State Highway, the City does not have authority to install a light. Ni nutes\7~2/,\90 - 11 - 08/08/90 City Council Minutes July 24° 1990 3e It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve staff recommendations 22.1, 22.2 and 22.4 subject to changes in Planning Department conditions number 2, 3, and 5; Engineering Department conditions number 20 and 24, further adding a condition 23(a). The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to read by title only, waive further reading and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 5563, CHANGING THE 2ONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO CPS (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 79. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None adoption of Revised Planning and Engineering Fees Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 11:10 PM. City Manager Dixon reported this is an ordinance and resolution which would allow existing planning and engineering fees to be increased. He recommended raising the City's fees in accordance with other Cities in the area. Having no requests to speak, Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 11:11 PM. 14 i nut es\7~2~\90 - 12 - 08/08/90 City Council Minutes JulV 24° 1990 It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to read by title only, waive further reading and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-14 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 90-04 PERTAINING TO CONSOLIDATED FEES FOR LAND USE AND RELATED FUNCTIONS. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a motion to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR LANDUSEAND RELATED FUNCTIONS The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER REPORTS City Manager Dixon stated this meeting should be adjourned to a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to be held Monday, July 30, 1990 at 7:00 PM, Vail Elementary School. He stated the purpose of this meeting is to set procedural guidelines for the Planning Commission. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. H i nutes\7~24\90 - 13 - 08/08/90 .... City Council Minutes July 24. 1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Mufioz requested staff look into a City-wide refuse collection program and curbside recycling. Mayor Parks asked to have consideration of his representation of the City at a meeting to be held in Washington, D.C. placed on the agenda. The purpose of the meeting will be discussions of the Space Systems Division relocation and economic development considerations in the County. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to adjourn at 11:15 PM to a meeting to be held on July 30, 1990 at the Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California at 7:00 PM. The motion was unanimously approved. ATTEST: RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR JUNE S. GREEK, DEPUTY CITY CLERK N i nutes\7\24\90 - 14 - 08/08/90 MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD JULY 30, 1990 A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council and Planning Commission was called to order at 6:58 PM in the Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: 1 Also present were City Manager David COUNCILMEMBERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks None Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff Blair Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, Assistant City Attorney John Cavenaugh and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Planning Commission Chairman Dennis Chiniaeff. PUBLIC COMMENTS Sydney Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, spoke regarding the new schedules for Temecula Valley High School and the middle schools in the district. He said he feels the City Council needs to address school overcrowding, which necessitates classes starting at 7:10 AM, when considering any new developments in the City. Ray McLaughlin, 30025 Front Street, addressed the Council and Commission regarding the current building taking place along LaSerena Way. He stated that the development being constructed by Buie Corporation and the amount of grading which is taking place at that site has created an extreme noise and dirt problem for the adjacent properties. He also said the grading has caused neighboring properties to lose the scenic views they had previously enjoyed. Minutes/07\30\90 I July 30, 1990 Citv Council Minutes July 30. 1990 DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Current procedures and authority for consideration of discretionary projects. City Manager Dixon outlined the issues to be discussed during the joint meeting. He said the policies that need to be developed would be discussed and he suggested that similar joint meetings be held as often as necessary to address concerns end the directions in which the Council and Commission will wish to go. He then introduced Gary Thornhill, who presented a staff report outlining the types of projects which are reviewed by the City. He explained tentative maps, both tract and parcel maps; plot plans, also known as site or development plan reviews; Conditional Use Permits and the development review process from application to final City Council action. City Attorney Scott Field reviewed the current County of Riverside approval process. He also explained examples of types of zoning and methods for changing zoning. He outlined the factors that make up a specific plan, which are sometimes referred to as planned unit developments (PUD's). Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that the Planning Commission should review residential parcel maps because in many cases the Commission is more aware than staff of the political considerations in these cases. Councilmember Lindemans said he feels that when an extension of time is requested on tentative maps the City Council should have another opportunity to examine the conditions of approval. He also questioned the difference between certificates of compliance and substantial conformance. Gary Thornhill defined the two and advised that all substantial conformance applications were being reviewed with the Planning Commission. City Manager Dixon discussed the various options available to the Council and Commission relative to the amount of authority each body might have in approving planning matters. He said the time frame required for projects to be completed would be a very important consideration. Mr. Dixon pointed out that if the Council decided to look at all cases, additional cost and well as time would be involved. Mayor Parks asked what a typical cost might be for a public hearing before the City Council in a matter which has already been approved by the County. City Manager Dixon replied that this could cost approximately $1,000. Minutes/07~30~90 2 July 30, 1990 Citv Council Minutes Julv 30. 1990 Gary Thornhill, in response to a question from Commissioner Fahey, said the County has sent the last of the active cases to the City. He said he believes there are about 75 cases to be dealt with. City Attorney Scott Field outlined four options available to the City Council for defining the areas of authority for approving planning matters as follows: Planning commission would be authorized to hear and approve all subdivision development applications with a simple right of appeal to the City Council. The Planning commission would act as an advisor agency only. They would simply make recommendations to the City Council with the Council making all final decisions. The smaller projects would go to the Planning Commission for final approval and larger projects would go to the Council for final approval. The example given was projects under 50 acres or commercial projects under 50,000 square feet would go to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would have final authority on all projects but each City Councilmember would have the right to appeal any Commission decision. This would be accomplished by having an action memo go out to the Councilmembers the morning following the Commission meeting describing each action taken. This would give the Councilmembers eight to nine days to make a decision on whether or not they wished to have the Council hear a specific matter. Mr. Field advised that staff recommended option three. Councilmember Mu~oz said he would like to see a combination of options three and four considered. Chairman Chiniaeff said option two is not acceptable to the Commission because it does not utilize them at all. Councilmember Moore suggested perhaps the Council might consider option four with a limitation on the number of appeals each Councilmember can file. Mayor Parks said he would support option three and any appeals of Commission actions should be received from opponents and proponents of a project. Minutes/07~30\90 3 July 30, 1990 .- Ciw Council Minutes Julv 30. 1990 City Manager Dixon recommended that the four options should be discussed by the Planning Commission to formulate a recommendation to the Council. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that the City Manager make this recommendation to the City Council based on the comments expressed by the Council and Commission. RECESS Mayor Parks declared a recess at 8:30 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:40 PM. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Cont.) Consideration of the necessity for interim land use development oolicies and/or guidelines as a "stop gaD" measure until the adoption of the City's General Plan. The Council and Commission agreed to take a straw vote on each of the policies rating them from A to C, with A indicating the highest priority. 1. Construction on slopes; establishment of "blue line" or policies relative to maximum slopes or slope/density formulas. Rating (B) 2. Landscaping; establishment of standards for coverage, setback, and consideration of policies relative to drought resistant (Xeriscape) materials. Rating (C + ) 3. Parking in impacted areas of town (e.g., "Old Town"). Rating (B) 4. Buffering of agricultural lands from urban encroachment. Rating (A +) 5. Acceptable service levels at impacted intersections and design capacities as these issues relate to the approval of new development projects. Ratin9 (A) 6. General traffic circulation within the City; policies requiring adequate traffic circulation for land use decisions. Rating (A) 7. Parks and recreation issues and standards relating to their development. Rating (A) Minutes/07\30\90 4 July 30, 1990 _-~ City Council Minutes July 30, 1990 Consideration of development decisions as they relate to the adequacy of services (e.g., schools, water, sewer, etc.). Rating (C) Mass Transit issues as they relate to new development (i.e., Bus turnouts, provisions of bus shelters, etc.). Rating (B-) Development Guidelines 1. Architectural guidelines to assist developers and staff in ascertaining appropriate architectural styles. Rating (B) 2. Landscape guidelines to encourage xeriscape materials and to provide guidance relative to the design and installation of plant materials (including bonding and inspection provisions). Rating (B-) 3. Design guidelines for "Old Town" addressing such issues as parking, extent of the historic district, curbs and gutters, landscaping, architecture, etc.) Rating (4) Councilmember Mu~oz suggested adding other policy priorities as follows: 10. Establishing a policy related to signs. Rating (A) 11. High density development related to the general plan and zoning. Rating (B) Chairman Chiniaeff suggested adding the following priority: 12. SWAP being used as more than a planning guideline. Rating (B) CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. CITY MANAGER REPORT None given. COUNCIL REPORTS None given at this time. COMMISSION REPORTS Minutes/07\30\90 5 July 30, 1990 Ciw Council Minutes Julv 30. 1990 Commissioner Ford asked staff to provide information on the matter of hiring an engineering firm for the Ynez Corridor Mello Roos. Chairman Chiniaeff asked for information on when the sphere of influence study will be completed. He also asked if the issue of placing an additional feeder road on the West side of the City is to be addressed by the Commission. City Manager Dixon responded that the matter of a West-side road would be a consideration during the general plan discussions. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at 9:26 PM to a regular City Council meeting to be held at 7:00 PM on July 31, 1990 at the Temecula Town Center. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk Minutes/07\30\90 6 July 30, 1990 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD JULY 31, 1990 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:05 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Tim Riter, Rancho Christian Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Moore. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Parks presented certificates of appreciation to companies and organizations contributing $2,000 or more toward the traffic control program. The recipients were as follows: Arco - AM/PM Advanced Cardio Vascular Systems American Industrial Manufacturers Bedford Development Company Coalition for a Reasonable Environment (C.A.R.E) Rancho California Builders Ranpac Temecula Valley Pipe and Supply Company PUBLIC COMMENTS James Marpie, 28541 Via Princesa, asked that all new projects considered for approval be conditioned to install systems to prevent urban runoff and to conserve Hi nutes\7~l \~0 - 1 - 08/06/90 City Council Minutes July 31, 1990 ground water. He asked that a committee be appointed to research this issue and come up with a recommended course of action. Ray McLaughlin, 30025 Front Street, asked that the problem of excessive noise and traffic be looked into in the area of La Serena Road. He stated property values are going down as a result of this problem. Jane Vernon, 30268 Mersey Ct., asked that public hearings be held on projects, even though they have been approved by the County. She stated citizens living in Temecula want to have a say in this community. Councilmember Mu~oz asked staff where the points brought up by Mr. Marpie regarding water conservation should be directed. City Manager Dixon stated the matter should be referred to the City Engineer and County Flood Control and water agencies to respond. He suggested obtaining expert advise on this issue rather than forwarding to a committee. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve the Consent Calendar as follows: 1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances included in the agenda. Second Reading Ordinance Amending Zoning Map in Change of Zone Application - Development Permit No. 5563 2.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 5563, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO CPS (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY L OCA TED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 79. nut es\~31 \90 - 2 - 08/06/90 City Council Minutes 3. July 31, 1990 Second Reading - Ordinance Amending Ordinance Pertaining to Consolidated Fees for Land Use and Related Functions 3.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A CONSOLIDA TED SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR LAND USE AND RELA TED FUNCTIONS The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCIL BUSINESS 4. Route 15 Freeway Maintenance Agreement City Manager Dixon reported the County of Riverside, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula, agreed and consented to certain adjustments of the then County road system required for the development of State Highway Route 15 as a freeway. The City has assumed the obligation for maintenance of specified portions of this system from the County. He recommended that the City Council approve the attached agreement for freeway maintenance and specified portions of Route 15. Councilmember Moore asked if this would allow the City to maintain the median on I-15. City Manager Dixon responded that CalTrans has very specific requirements on who is allowed on the freeways. He stated he would not feel comfortable having City employees on the freeway, as it is a safety risk. Councilmember Mu~oz asked what responsibility the County had in regard to past maintenance that was neglected. City Manager Dixon answered that maintenance is due in many areas, but it is doubtful whether any of this money can be retrieved. N t nutes\Z'G 1 ~,90 - 3 - 08/06/90 City Council Minutes JulV 31. 1990 Mayor Parks said that State law now gives counties the right to bill new cities for services performed. Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a motion to approve Freeway Maintenance Agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None City Hall Lease Agreement City Manager Dixon reported that staff has a need to expand. He said this agreement would provide a lease for five months which would give the City an opportunity to hire additional staff. He recommended approval of the lease agreement between the City of Temecula and Windsor Partners. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to authorize the City Manager to enter into a lease agreement between the City of Temecula and Windsor Partners - Rancho Industrial for office space located at Windsor Park 1,43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200, for a period of five months. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Travel Al~propriations for Ronald Parks to Washington D.C. Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to approve participation of Mayor Ronald J. Parks with the Valley Group for the purpose of traveling to Washington, D. C. to meet with congressional N i nutes\7~31%,90 ' ~ ' 08/06/90 City Council Minutes July 31, 1990 representatives and other officials related to economic development and other city-related business. Councilmember Mu~oz asked what Valley Group is and how close is the relationship between the Space Division relocated at March AFB and a positive impact on Temecula. He stated March AFB is 35 to 40 minutes away from the community and questioned whether additional funds should be spent in this 8reB. City Manager Dixon reported that the Valley Group is one part of a consortium that is looking at the opportunity of bringing the Space Division to March AFB. He stated that this would bring 7,500 high paying jobs, not just military but private contractors as well. Because of the high quality of life in Temecula, many of these people would choose to live in Temecula. Along with employment at March AFB, there will be many companies locating in the area to provide services needed. Mr. Dixon estimated the "spin-off" effect of the Space Division located at March AFB would be 25,000 to 30,000 jobs. Councilmember Mu~oz asked if this would happen whether or not we supported the program. Mr. Dixon responded that to bring industry to Temecula as opposed to Menifee or Lake Elsinore, the City need. s to take a pro- active roll. Councilmember Lindemans said that he supports this project not only for the additional jobs it may bring, but also because of the information that Mayor Parks will gain and be able to share with the Council. Mayor Parks stated the reason this has been brought before the Council is that he did not want to be obligated to any special interest group. He said he felt the only obligation should be to the City of Temecula. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks nut es\?~31 \90 - 5 - 08/06/~0 City Council Minutes JulV 31, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING 7. Plot Plan No. 2 - Related Case PP 11222 Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM. City Manager Dixon asked Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner to give the staff report. Mr. Thornhill reported that this plot plan as been previously approved, this request is to obtain a revised permit based on the following changes: To revise a plot plan for an approved 413,288 square foot commercial project on 41 acres as follows: a) A 12,734 square foot retail building. b) c) Reconfigure building square footage with a total net gain in square footage of 15,947 square feet for a total of 429, 175 square feet. Request for Special Review of parking. 2. To revise the subdivision for the site into nine commercial lots. Mr. Thornhill stated the applicant would be changing existing conditions number 22 and 25 with the condition number 22 included in the staff report. He outlined proposed changes in the staff report on page two. Mr. Thornhill stated one concern of staff is that with the Fall Season approaching, the traffic directors will need some lighting in order to perform their duties. These lights would need to be consistent with the Palomar Lighting District Plans. Councilmember Lindemans asked that Planning Commission minutes be included in the packet for review. Councilmember Mu~oz asked why these changes were needed. He stated he felt that County parking requirements were the minimum needed spaces. He said this plan would not only take away parking spaces but would increase density of commercial activity. Greg Erickson, representing Bedford Properties, explained the request for reduced parking was based on an analysis done by a parking consultant using data received from other shopping centers. He further explained that a theater would have primarily night usage. This would free additional parking for the center during the day-time shopping hours. 14 i nutes\7~31 \~) -6- 08/0~/90 City Council Minutes July 31, 1990 Councilmember Mu~oz asked when the street improvements were scheduled. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, reported 60 to 90 days. Councilmember MuSoz stated if the developer has a commitment from CalTrans, the Council should be informed. Mr. Erickson said his best estimate is 60-90 days. He said the plans have been approved and they will go out for bid on August 14, 1990. He further stated that the shopping center can only be occupied at 60% until the traffic improvements and signal are completed. He said that Bedford and Mervyns have expended $200,000 to complete the water lines required, so as not to delay the road improvements. He explained the reason the variance is requested is that Mervyns has a firm opening date and must make the Christmas season to open this year. He strongly urged the City Council to approve the plan. Councilmember Lindemans asked the status of the Mello Roos District's planned Apricot Overpass. City Manager Dixon stated CalTrans has set this on a fast track. He said the acquisition of property has not taken place but needs to be done in the next 30 days. He stated staff and CalTrans are moving forward on this issue. Councilmember Mu~oz expressed concern that conditions provide for the traffic be monitored by the developer. He stated he feels that until the improvements are completed, traffic directors will be needed and this language needs to be reflected in the conditions of approval. Councilmember Lindemans asked if the theater will be conditioned to always be a theater, expressing his concern over the parking requirement change. Mr. Erickson stated he would not like to see this as a permanent condition because it is very limiting. Lon Milligan, 22301 Foothill Blvd, representing Mervyns spoke in favor of the proposal to waive the condition that Winchester Road be completed before occupancy. She advised that she felt the project will park effectively and said it was in the shopping center's best interest to make sure this is not a problem. She stated Mervyns has been meeting with the County to find ways to accelerate the street improvements. She said a number of materials have been ordered and the installation of water systems has been completed in advance to not further delay the improvements. She stated Mervyns is looking forward to opening and they will be hiring approximately 250 people who will need to be trained. She asked the Council to support these changes. Ilinutes\7%31\90 -7- 08/06/90 .... City Council Minutes JulV 31. 1990 Dr. Dean Hill, asked what impact the proposed Apricot Overpass would have on his business which is located adjacent to the proposed site and asked the Council why he had not be contacted. Mayor Parks stated this is not a part of this agenda item but asked Deputy City Engineer Doug Stewart to arrange a meeting with Dr. Hill. James Marpie, 28541 Via Princessa, asked that the Council consider conditioning this project for a change in the parking lot to include pervious pavement which would allow rain water to settle through the pavement instead of being washed away. Mayor Parks asked if he knew of any commercial centers who use this type of pavement. Mr. Marpie answered he did not know of any in the West, only back East. Councilmember Mu~oz asked the developer what his feelings are on use of pervious pavement. Mr. Erickson replied that in parking lots, this type of pavement has had problems with buckling and settling, but he would be happy to discuss the issue. Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 8:25 PM. Councilmember Mu~oz stated he was not happy about taking away additional parking spaces and felt the standard should not be changed. He also asked that the wording of condition 22 be modified requiring the use of traffic directors until the traffic improvements are completed. Mayor Parks said he feels the Planning Commission has looked at this project extensively and the Council should accept their recommendations. He said the developer has agreed to provide traffic directors and we should accept these recommendations. Councilmember Lindemans asked for City Manager Dixon's advise. Mr. Dixon suggested that the recommendation be changed from, "the developer will monitor intersection traffic levels", to "City Engineering will monitor traffic levels and determine when traffic directors are needed." It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 7.1 Approve Plot Plan No. 2, a revised permit for county Plot Plan No. 11222, based on the findings contained in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval as amended by the Planning Commission on July 16, 1990. tli nutes\7~ 1 \90 - 8 - 08/06/90 -- CitV Council Minutes July 31. 1990 7.2 Approve Tentative Parcel No. 23430, Revised No. 1, based on the findings contained in the County Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of approval with the deletion of Road Condition #25. Condition No. 22, was changed to read, "as mitigation, the City Engineering staff will monitor intersection traffic levels and the developer will pay for traffic directors when needed at the intersection after opening until the improvements are completed, so as to keep the level of service at the intersection at current operational level." The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None RECESS Mayor Parks called at recess at 8:50 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the CSD meeting at 9:35 PM. CITY MANAGER REPORTS City Manager Dixon requested that regular meetings be held twice a month starting in August and on the odd weeks, a study session be held. He requested a closed session be held on August 7, 1990 to discuss acquisition of City offices and facilities, redevelopment litigation and pending claims. He asked that this meeting be adjourned to August 7, 1990, 7:00 PM at City Hall. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. nut es \7%31 \90 - 9 - 08/06/90 CitV Council Minutes July 31. 1990 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Lindemans requested the following: Matching funds be considered for a Temecula Banner to be used by the Temecula Valley High School Band. He requested placement on a future agenda. Requested staff consider an ordinance requiring specific parking allocation to specific land use designations. Requested a joint meeting be scheduled with Parks and Recreation and Public Safety Commissions similar to the recent Planning Commission/Council Meeting. Councilmember Moore requested the following: Asked what the status of swearing in Parks and Recreation and Public Safety Commissioners. Suggested other Councilmembers besides herself and Councilmember Mu~oz take tour and become familiar with AB939 Waste Disposal program. Councilmember Birdsall requested that staff schedule the Public Safety Commission swearing in. Councilmember Mu~oz requested the following: Asked that staff look into the possibility of replacing the flaming symbol on the Temecula Monument Signs to the symbol of a rose. Asked that Council begin discussing where the Community Recreational Center be built· 3. Asked the status of the KRTM Radio Tower and when it will be moved. 4. Requested staff give a regular report on the status of temporary road improvements. N i rtutes\7~31 \90 - 10- 08/06/~0 City Council Minutes July 31. 1990 Mayor Parks re(luested the following: 1. Asked the status of locating and acquisition of additional park land. Outlined a proposed Congestion Management Plan and asked Council to become familiar with the Program to see if City wishes to participate. To be scheduled as a future agenda item. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to adjourn at 9:55 PM to a meeting on August 7, 1990, 7:00 PM at City Hall. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR JUNE S. GREEK, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Hi nutes\7~l \90 - 11 - 08/06/90 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE RELOCATION OF THE SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION FROM LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE TO MARCH AIR FORCE BASE WHEREAS, the United States Air Force has announced its intention to relocate its Space Systems Division from Los Angeles AFB in an effort to consolidate its functions to realize greater efficiency, provide for future expansion, and improve the quality of life for its military and civilian personnel by providing access to affordable housing and reducing commuter time. These efforts should allow the Air Force to achieve its goal of attracting a professional management team for future space systems development. Also, the Air Force has announced its intention to relocate the Ballistic Missile Organization from Norton AFB in an effort to improve operational efficiency. WHEREAS, the Air Force has maintained an active facility at March AFB since 1917 and the Ballistic Missile Organization or similar agency at Norton AFB since 1962. WHEREAS, California is a critical location for the entire pacific area with respect to supporting all space defense initiatives. WHEREAS, the community leaders of Temecula, Riverside, and San Bernardino areas have joined together to relocate the Space Systems Division to March AFB and to keep the Ballistic Missile orgnni-~tion at Norton AFB. Should the Air Force decide to move the Ballistic Missile Organization, the commqllity leaders agree it should move to March AFB. WHEREAS, March Air Force Base possesses the necessary physical space, would provide continuity of operations within the Los Angeles basin, would cause minimal environmental disruption, has access to adequate and reasonably priced housing, offers easy access to Ontario International Airport, is close to a number of colleges and universities within the Inland Empire enjoys excellent military, community relations, and has an excellent geographical location with adequate land for base and industrial expansion. i~_W. OLVED, that the City of Temecula respectfully requests the Department of the Air Force to relocate the Space Systems Division from Los Angeles AFB to March AFB, and to keep the Ballistic Missile Organization at Norton AFB, or should it be moved, relocate the Ballistic Missfie Organization to March Air Force Base. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 1990. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk 4~,~elml~9 081~190 1 4 6 8 10 11 14 15 18 21 24 ~.8 D~MARCO AND ARAUJO A IIlOIrflllONAt LAW COIIImOIIATION IO1~ NORTH BROADWAY IANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 91701 I'BI, EPHONE ('714) 831-ll90 A~me~ ~o~ Claimant, DAVID CUEVAS BELOW X~)R FD. ZNG STAMP ONLY) i,i~ JiJL 2 8 1~90 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO: CITY OF TEMECULA City Clerk 43172 Business Park Drive P. O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 RE: Claimant : D/Accident: DAVID CUEVAS, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Espiridion Cuevas 1/24/90 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT: DAVID CUEVAS (a minor) 39643 Willflower Drive Murrietta, CA 92362 NOTICE TO BE SENT TO: DI MARCO AND ARAUJO A Professional Law Corporation 1015 North Broadway Santa Ana, CA 92701 DATE AND PLACE OF ACCIDENT: January 24, 1990 at approximately 8:40 p.m. on SR-79 (Winchester Road) .6 miles north of Ynez Road, City of Temecula, City of Riverside, California. DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT: On or about January 24, 1990, David Cuevas suffered multiple severe injuries while occupying a vehicle operated by Juan Cuevas Magana. The claimant's vehicle was proceeding north on SR-79 (Winchester Road) when a second vehicle (1976 Chevrolet Van) operated by Keith George Trotter, heading southbound on SR-79 crossed over into northbound lane -1- · · 4 8 10 14 15 16 ]-8 19 21 26 ,?,8 DdlARCO AND A PIOleIJIIONAI, CAUIrORNeA 91701 TEL,/,PNONE 4714) striking the claimant's vehicle head on. As a result of this impact the claimant's vehicle flipped and rolled severely injuring the claimant. (Note: There was a resulting fatality and two additional injured parties in claimant's vehicle). Claimant contends that the roadway (SR-79 near Ynez Road) was negligently engineered, designed, constructed, controlled and maintained so as to create a dangerous condition when utilized by the public in general. Specifically, claimant contends that the aforementioned roadway was not properly lit, was not properly marked by appropriate road signs warning motorists of an impending/dangerous curve alerting them to reduce vehicular speed, and that the roadway was covered with sand and gravel which impaired vehicular traction and breaking ability. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INJURIES: David Cuevas suffered multiple severe lacerations and other severe personal injuries including fractures and internal injuries. GENERAL DAMAGES: In an amount over $10,000.00 and within the jurisdictional limits of the Superior Court. SPECIAL DAMAGES: DATED: July 20, 1990 /// /// /// To be determined. DI MARCO AND ARAUJO A Professional Law Corporation DAVID CUEVAS -2- PROOF OF SERVICE 1013A (3) CCP Revised 5/1/88 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1015 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California 92701. as: On July 23, 1990, I served the foregoing document described CLAIMMR DAMAGES on the interested parties in this action by placing the original thereof in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: CITY OF TEMECULA City Clerk 43172 Business Park Drive P. O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 BY PERSONAL SERVICE I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee. Executed on July 23, 1990, at Santa Ana, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. MONICA BOWEN ,41~ACE BELOW FOR FHaII~G eTAUP ONLY) 1 4 5 DIMARCO AND ARAUJO A lellOlellllONAl. LAW ~,OItPOItATION 101B NOItl'H BROADWAY IAlqr!'A ANA, ~ALIIrORNIA ~1701 '!'EI. IPHONt (714) 135-1190 A~me~ mr Claimant, MAYRA CUEVAS 6 8 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 9 10 11 12 TO: CITY OF TEMECULA City Clerk 43172 Business Park Drive P. O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 13 14 RE: Claimant : D/Accident: MAYRA CUEVAS, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Espiridion Cuevas 1/24/90 15 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT: MAYRA CUEVAS (a minor) 39643 Willflower Drive Murrietta, CA 92362 17 18 19 NOTICE TO BE SENT TO: DI MARCO AND ARAUJO A Professional Law Corporation 1015 North Broadway Santa Ana, CA 92701 DATE AND PLACE OF ACCIDENT: January 24, 1990 at approximately. 8:40 p.m. on SR-79 (Winchester Road) .6 miles north of Ynez Road, City of Temecula, City of Riverside, California. DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT: On or about January 24, 1990, Mayra Cuevas suffered multiple severe injuries while occupying a vehicle operated by Juan Cuevas Magana. The claimant's vehicle was proceeding north on SR-79 (Winchester Road) when a second 27 vehicle (1976 Chevrolet Van) operated by Keith George Trotter, 28 .heading southbound on SR-79 crossed over into northbound lane -1- striking the claimant's vehicle head on. As a result of this impact the claimant's vehicle flipped and rolled severely injuring the claimant. (Note: There was a resulting fatality and two additional injured parties in claimant's vehicle). Claimant contends that the roadway (SR-79 near Ynez Road) was negligently engineered, designed, constructed, controlled and maintained so as to create a dangerous condition when utilized by the public in general. Specifically, claimant contends that the aforementioned roadway was not properly lit, was not properly marked by appropriate road signs warning motorists of an impending/dangerous curve alerting them to reduce vehicular speed, and that the roadway was covered with sand and gravel which impaired vehicular traction and breaking ability. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INJURIES: Mayra Cuevas suffered multiple severe lacerations to her lower extremities together with left leg tibial-fibular fracture, right knee tibial-fibular fractures, and right hip femoral neck fracture. GENERAL DAMAGES: In an amount over $10,000.00 and within the jurisdictional limits of the Superior Court. Presently exceed $40,000.00 and SPECIAL DAMAGES: are continuing. DATED: July 20, 1990 Iil III DI MARCO AND ARAUJO A Professional Law Corporation By': ' ~ -2- PROOF OF SERVICE 1013A (3) CCP Revised 5/1/88 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1015 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California 92701. On July 23, 1990, I served the foregoing document described as: CLAIM FOR DAMAGES on the interested parties in this action by placing the original thereof in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: CITY OF TEMECULA City Clerk 43172 Business Park Drive P. O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 BY PERSONAL SERVICE I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee. Executed on July 23, 1990, at Santa Ana, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. MONICA BOWEN CARLA DeDOMINICIS ATTORNEY AT LAW 326 E. Grand Avenue (619) 46oo9o3 14r. IlavidlYasc~ P.O. T,,m~__Lla, California 92390 ~ office has been retained by Maria, Arttn~, Cabrlal md Jose ~ to Fwteet their leSsl rlShts, ~ if necessary, lxwsus thei= leSal r~ies arisinS out of ~n aut~vbtle accident in which they were injured when an aSent of ~e CiCy's srn~al Wine and Balloon Festival drove a limosine while drunk, be__~_-on into the m~tozhcme in which they were passeriSers. l~ clients have received va--Tir~ deEtees of injury, ranSix~ Farla ~ho sustained third deSree hurns over 25 percent of her body to Cabrial who zecei~ed ~or bun~ a~d soft tissue injuries. ~lditionally, the driver of the motoriv,~ ~as killed and his parents injured, alth~ they are represented by camsel otherthanmeo I have ben in contact ~ith the insurmce cc~pmies that Frovidsd coyeraSe to the limpsine ~sr, driver, snd the Chsmber of G~e. Bo~sver, the lt-Hts of inm~sw.e wailable are ins~ficient to caepensate all of ~ potetial plaintiffs ~nd It is my initial belief that the City of T*~_,!~ may share erm~ zespcnsibility for the accident, in that in SrmtinS permits and sup~ to the C~ to host this event, it failed to take re~ov~hle steps to assure that indies ~ho were drlvinS for the festival ~ld not participate in the fastival's alcoholic df~J_n~; or in other ~0~ls, the City ne~i~ntly supervised the festival's oration and execution. 1~dle I believe that the cenparative fault of the City is far less than that of the other tortf~__~ws in this action, I feel compelled to pursue my clients riShts aSainst it. Consequently, I am enclosin8 ~ a claim pursuant to 9 I as Gov~.~,m,mzt Code § 10. k that you foxward it to the ix~urance company that issued the liquor policy that provides inda~d~icatton to the City o~ T_p, np~la and ask that a claims adjuster contact me so we c_~n_ det~.~ne whether this nmtter can be ~ndcably resolved without the need for litigation. ~~rfa'De~_nici~/~s CD/dks CertifiedMail P-575 875 372 1 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 1Z 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 :~0 ~5 CARLA DeDOMINIClS Attorney at Law 326 E. Grand Avenue Escondido, California 92025 (619) 480-0903 Attorney for CLAIMANTS IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF MARIA, ARTURO, GABRIAL, AND JOSE MARQUEZ, Claimants, CITY OF TEMECULA, and COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, and DOES 1 to 100 Defendants. CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES [GOVT. §910] TO: THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, P.O. Box 3000, Temecula, California 92390; and THE COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California 92501-3656: MARIA, ARTURO, GABRIAL and JOSE MARQUEZ, each individually, hereby presents this claim to the CITY OF TEMEC~ and the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE pursuant to Section 910 of the California Government Code. 1. The Names of the Claimants are as follows: MARIA MARQUEZ, ARTURO MARQUEZ, GABRIAL, MARQUEZ and JOSE MARQUEZ whose address is 311 Main Street, Elsinore, California. 2. On May 20, 1990, on Pala Road at or near its intersection with Rainbow Canyon Road, claimants and each of them 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 received personal injuries under the following circumstances: A vehicle driven by Deborah Hoehn-, who was in the course and scope of her duties as a chauffeur for the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, was being driven by her southbound in the northbound travel lane while she was under the influence of alcohol, thereby violating Vehicle Code Sections 21~60 and 23153, when it colltded head-on with the motorhome in which claimants were passengers, and exploded into a ball of fire. 3. Claimants are informed and believe that The City of Temecula and the County of Riverside are the municipal entities charged with issuing all applicable permtts to, providing security for and supervising the balloon festival organization and execution, and did so negligently and carelessly, by among other things, failing to establish policies, or take precautionary action to assure that drivers employed in the course of the community event would not be served nor consume alcohol prior to driving in the course and scope of their duties with the festival. 4. So far as it is known to claimants, at the date of filing this claim, each of the claimants have been injured. Claimant Maria Marquez suffered third-degree bums over 25- percent of her body and has incurred in excess of 870,000.00 in medical bills to date. Claimant Arturo, Gabrial and Jose Marquez have suffered second degree burns and soft tissue injury, and have collectively incurred in excess of $10,000.00 in medical bills to date. 5. The true names and capacities (whether individual, 2 1 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 26 27 28 corporate, associate or otherwise) of Defendant Does 1 to 100 are unknown to claimants who sue them by fictitious names. Claimants are informed and believe and thereon allege that each defendant designated herein as a Doe is a public employee responsible in some fashion for the events and happenings referred to herein and caused injuries and damages to claimants as alleged. 6. At the time of presentation of this claim, claimants and each of them, claim general and special damages in an amount greater than $10,000.00 and within the jurisdictional limits of the Superior Court of California. 7. All notices pertaining to this claim are to be directed to Claimants' attorney of record at the following Post-office address: Carla DeDominicis Attorney at Law 326 E. Crand Avenue Escondido, Californa 92025 Dated: July 20, 1990 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA I am employed in the County of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age 0f eighteen and not a party to the within action; my business address is 326 East Grand Avenue, Escondido, California, 92025. On July 23, 1990 I served the foregoing documents described as CLAIN FOR PERSONAL INJURIES on all interested parties in this action by placing the original copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: The City Clerk of the City of Temecula P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, California 92390 · The COunty Clerk of the County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501-3656 : I caused such envelope with certified postage thereon fully paid and return receipt request to be placed in the United States mail at Escondido, California. I am "readily familiar" with firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postage cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing affidavit. Executed on July 23, 1990 at Escondido, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. the DEAN K, SNITH BARRY ~I.S~ ATTORNEY AT LAW 1801 CENTURY pARK EAST TWENTY FOURTH FLOOR LOs ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90067 (2¶ 3) 552-3242 FAX: (213) 552-5332 CLAIM FOR DAKXGEB (CITY OF TF~ECULX) 1) S~BMIT TO: TEMECULA CITY HALL P.O. BOX 3000 TEMECULA, CA. 92390 2) NAME XND ADDRESS OF CLAIMANT: Paul M. Stuart Nicholas Stuart, (a minor) 27475 Ynez Road, #454 Temecula, California 92390 3) AGE.* 37; 3 4 ) MARITAL STATUS: Widower; son 5) JAME AND ADDRESS OF SPOUSE, IF ANY: (Deceased - Babette Stuart) 6 ) PLACE OF ACCIDENT: Highway 79 and Pala Road, Temecula, California 7) DATE ~ DAY OF ACCIDENTz February 6, 1990 S) TIMEl 10:30 p.m. 9) AMOUNT OF CLAIM (in dollars) (X) PROPERTY DAMAGEz (B) PERSONAL ZNJtTRYt (C) WRONGFUL DEATH: $10,500 Approx. $2,000,000.00 Approx. $8,000,000.00 1 xo) 12) "3) (D) TOTAL: $10,010. 500.00 DESCRIPTION OF ACCZDENTt Please see attachment, Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by this reference. PROPERTY DAMAGE NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER, IF OTHER THAN CLAIMANT= N/A BRIEFLY DESCRIBE KIND AND LOCATION OF PROPERTY aND EXTENT OF DAMAGE = 1981 MBZ-3000D Metcedes Benz~ Calif. License Plate No. KUH392~ totalled. CHP Fleet towing, Temecula Calif. Highway Patrol. PERSONAL INJURY STATE NATURE AND EXTENT OF INJURY WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF THIS CLAIM: Please see attachment, Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by this reference. WITNESSES NAME U.S. Border Patrol Agents John D. King Carlos J. Ramos (Others Unknown) ADDRESS 43136 Rancho Way., Temecula, Ca. 92390 (Also see attached CHP Report) DATE OF CLAIM= July 25, 1990 MI MI /11 2 15) DO YOU CAI~Y ]kCCIDmeNT INBURANC~ (X) YES, ZF YES , GIVE NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURANCE COMPANY AND POLICY NUMBER. ( ) NO. State Farm Insurance (auto) Agent: Lori Caltenbach CLAIMS SERVICE CENTER 19770 Mariner Ave. Torrance, Ca. 90503 Policy No.: 594570C117B (see below also, parag. 20) 16) NAVE YOU FILED Cla~IM ON YOUR INSURANCE CARRIER IN THIS INSTANCE, aND IF SO, IS IT FULL COVERAGE OR DEDUCTIBLE? Yes, Full Coverage. 17) IF DEDUCTIBLE, STATE AMOUNT: Deductible Waived. 18) IF CLAIM NAS BEEN WITH YOUR CARRIER, WHAT ACTION HAS YOUR INSURER TAKEN WITH REFERENCE TO YOUR CLAIM? State Farm - auto, UMbenefits - total paid approx. $43,000.00. Case No. 755311481 Amex-American Express Life Ins., paid $100,000.00 Continental Airlines (Paul Stuart ts employer) Life Ins. benefits paid $50,000.00 19) DO YOU CARRY PUBLIC LIABILITY 3~ND PROEPRTY DAMA6E INSURANCE? ( ) YES, IF YES, GIVE NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURANCE CARRIER (X) NO. 20) LIST OF DOCUMENTS aTTACHED: (&) California Highway Patrol Report (B) All Medical Records and Bills in Claimants' possession at the time of this claim. (C) Reports from U.S. Border Patrol (D) Other relevant documentation supporting this claim is being requested and will be made available through Claimants' Attorney. 2:1.) SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY FOR CLAIMANT DATED: July 25, 1990 III Iii 111 imants 4 Claims of Paul M. Stuart and minor son. Nicholas Stuart Paragraph 11 - Description of Accident; Paragraph 13 - Personal Injury. On February 6, 1990, at approximately 10:30 p.m., Claimant Paul M. Stuart was operating his 1981 MBZ-3000 Metcedes Benz (California License Plate No. KUH392) easthound on SR-79 approaching Pala Road, in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. Accompanying Claimant were his wife, dacedent Babette Stuart (pronounced dead at scene) in the first passenger seat, and his son Nicholas Stuart (date of birth May 28, 1987) in the rear seat. At approximately 10:20 p.m., on said date, US Border Patrol Agents John D. King and Carlos J. Ramos and other US Border Patrol agents unknown to Claimants, acting in the authorized scope of their employment, purportedly were observing traffic on Rainbow Canyon Road in Temecula. The agents reported that they observed a blue Hyundai Excel bearing California license plate number 2KIES49 pass through the illumination of the agentse marked Border Patrol sedanes headlights. The agents stated that they observed the driver, one Francisco Javier Gutierrez (a minor) and three 1 passengers (Jeffrey B. Kincaid and Gerreld G. Kincaid - twins, born January 18, 1972 - and Roger W. Quilalang, a minor) in the vehicle. The agents stated the occupants of the Hyundai were staring straight ahead, failing to acknowledge the presence of the Border Patrol agents, and all four appeared to be of latin descent. Based on those observations the Border patrol agents followed the Hyundai for the stated purpose of initiating an ~mmigration inspection. The agents activated the unites overhead lights. The Hyundai, however, did not pull over. Agents state they activated the unites siren, and at this Juncture the Hyundai purportsally sped up. A high-speed vehicular pursuit was undertaken as follows. The chase proceeded northbound on Rainbow Canyon Road, up to reported speeds of 60 m.p.h. Agents state observing the Hyundai taking comers widely onto the wrong side of the street. The fleeing vehicle failed to stop at a posted stop sign at Pala Hont, turned left, and continued northbound on Pala Road. Agents report that after crossing the Temecula Creek Bridge, Pala Road makes a right-hand 90 degree decreasing radius turn Just prior to intersecting with Highway 79. Also,'there is a 10 foot brick wall on the west side of Pala Road, at this location, which agents report blocks the view of traffic travelling east on Highway 79. As the chase continued at this location, agents reported that the Hyundai entered the aforesaid right-hand curve of Pala Road in the opposite, on-coming lane of traffic and that the vehicle~s left tires were completely on the dirt shoulder of the west-side of Pala Road. As the Hyundai entered the T-intersection of Pala Road and Highway 79 the driver of the Hyundai failed to stop at the stop sign, cutting the corner turning left, and caused the Hyundai to collide with the claimantts vehicle at the right passenger door and rear-right portion of claimant's vehicle. The high-speed chase extended over a distance of 2.5 miles~ Agents report they never observed the Hyundaits brake lights go on, and that throughout the chase, they were approximately three to four car lengths behind the fleeing vehicle. B: Damages As a result of the high-speed pursuit that culminated Jn t~e said collision, the claimants have been caused the following injuries and damages: 1) Loss of the love, affection, solace, support, society, and consortlure of wife and mother Babette Stuart who died at the scene, in the approximate sum of $8,000,000.00. 2) Loss of a viable fetus carried by decedent Babette Stuart at the time of the incident. 3) Property damages in the sum of $10,500.00. 4) Personal Injuries in a sum to be ascertained. 5) Personal injuries comprised of general and special damages in the total approximate sum of $2,000,000.00 ~ Claimants intend to seek an award of punitive damages against the individual Border Patrol agents in a sum according to proof. 6) Claimants reserve the right to introduce any such other and further injuries and damages as might be subsequently 3 discovered or ascertained continue. C. Basis of Claim Claimants base their State of California as investigation or discovery respective claims herein against the on the following theories. Claimants do,- however, reserve rights to supplement or otherwise Join other theories of liability against this agency that Light become known subsequently as investigation or discovery get under way. The State of California, through its authorized agents, acting within the scope of their official duties, and such other agents unknown to claimants, acted and/or failed to act reasonably under the facts and circumstances described above by, including but not limited to,.the following: (a) By wrongfully causing the death of Babette Stuart. (b) By causing Claimants to loose the love, solace, affection, moral support, contribution, and consortium of Babette Stuart. (c) By causing Claimants property damages, loss of use of property, loss of earnings and earning capacity, as well as causing Claimants to require medical care, treatment, and foreseeable future medical care and treatment and to incur medical expenses past, present and future. (d) By failing to construct, design, maintain, improve and/or otherwise make safe the roadways at and surrounding the intersection of SR-79 and Pala Road, in Temecula, California, in such a reasonable manner so as to prevent the unreasonable and 4 foreseeable risks of harm that caused Claimants injuries and damages, situated as motoristsa~d within a class of persons to be protected from such risks. (e) By failing to secure and/or make safe the subject intersection with the type of traffic control, signs and/or signals, warnings, devices, and road markings, in such a manner so as to prevent theunreasonable and unforeseeable risks of harm that caused Claimants injuries and damages. (f) By failing to limit, control, warn, enjoin, and/or otherwise secure portions of the roadways at and surrounding the subject intersection from encroadment of billboards signs, walks, and such other interferences of obstruction, and construction and such other meddling with said roadways by private landowners so as to prevent the unreasonable and foreseeable risks of harm that caused ~njuries and damages. (g) By failing to warn motorists situated as Claimants of the unreasonable and foreseeable risks if harm presented by the designand/or construction, and conditions of the subject roadways where the State of California knew or should haveknown of the U.S. Border Patrol activities that presented special damages to 3rd party motorists such as Claimants. (h) By failing to maintain the subject roadways in a reasonable and safe conditions so as to prevent the unreasonable and foreseeable risks of harm that caused Claimants injuries and damages. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT ABE: DEPT:~,',..~u.. TITLE: Resolution Establishing the City's Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 1990-91 DEPT ~?TY~ CITY CXTY HGR~/' Recommendat ion t That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution temporarily establishing the City's Appropriations Limit for FY 1990-91 of $9,785,200. Discussionz The City Attorney has recommended that the City Council adopt a "temporary" Gann limit, while the City pursues a validation action to revise the original Gann limit established by the electorate in November 1989. Using cost of living data provided by the State of California and population data provided by the County of Riverside, the City's Appropriations Limit for FY 1990-91 has been computed to be $9,785,200. This computation considers the effect of Proposition 111 in that the California CPI was used instead of the lower United States CPI. Appropriations subject to limitation proposed in the FY 1990-91 Budget total $5,991,467 which is $3,072,263 less than the computed limit. Additional appropriations to the budget funded by nontax sources such as service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies, grants or beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, any supplemental appropriations funded through increased tax sources would be subject to the Appropriations Limit and could not exceed the $3,072,263 variance indicated above. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater than $3,072,263 from budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limits, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years or voters approval of an increased in the City's Appropriations Limit. FISCAL IMPACT: As indicated in the attached schedule, the City's appropriations subject to limitation as proposed in the FY 1990-91 Budget are $3,072,263 less than the computed limit. Any supplemental appropriations funded through nontax sources would be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit. However, supplemental appropriations funded through tax revenues in excess of budget projections would -1- be subject to limitation and could not exceedthe $3,072,263 margin indicated above. Further, any overall increases in tax sources greater than $3,072,263 from budget estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limit, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years of voter approval of an increase in the City's Appropriations Limit. In implementing the provisions of SB 1352 as they relate to the Gann Initiative, it is recommended the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing the City's Appropriations Limit for FY 1990-91 of $9,785,200. Attachments Schedule 1, Classification of Revenue Sources and Calculation of Limit Margin Resolution Establishing Appropriations Limit for FY 1990-91 Exhibit A, Computation of Appropriations Limit Prepared By: City Manager' s Recomm -2- EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA COMPUTATION OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Base Appropriations Limit .............. $8,500,000 California Consumer Price Index Change** ......... 5.0% Population Change, (16.67 X 7/12) ............. 9.7% Cumulative Compound (1.05 X 1.097) ........... 15.12% FY 1990-91 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT ........... $9,785,200 ,SOURCE: County of Riverside, Planning Departments, Change in population for the unincorporated areas of the County. **SOURCE: State of California, Department of Industrial Relations. RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY1990-91 WIIFIEAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative (Proposition 4) on November 6, 1979, adding Article XIH B to the Constitution of the State of California to establish and deEme annual appropriation limits on state and local governmental entities; WtlEREAS, SB 1352 provides for the implementation of Article XIII B by defining various terms used in this article and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific provisions of the article, including the establishment by resolution each year by the governing body of each local jurisdiction of its appropriations limits; WHEREAS, the required computations to determine the Appropriations Limit for FY1990-91 have been performed by the Department of Finance and are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, and available for public review; WHEREAS, these computations are provided on the two pages of Exhibit "A" which is herein incorporated by reference and attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOL~ AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Appropriations Limit for the City of Temecula for FY1990-91 is $9,785,200. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 1990. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEALI Reao 67 08~08/90 SCHEDULE 1 C'-_~SSIFIC~TION OF REVENUE SOURCES CALCULATION OF LIMIT MARGIN 1990-91 PROPERTY TAX OTHER TAXES Sales Tax Property transfer tax Franchise fees Transient occupancy tax Business license LICENSES & PERMITS FINES & FORFEITURES REVENUE FROM USE OF MONEY INTERGOVERNMENTAL Cigarette tax Motor vehicle in lieu State gas tax revenues County transportation NON-TAX PROCEEDS 276,072 4,124,716 33,000 423,081 871,554 TAX PROCEED S 1,000,000 4,000,000 199,971 253,320 38,000 48,322 1,135,374 GRANTS OVERHEAD REIMBURSEMENT - CSD INVESTMENT INTEREST TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMITATION GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT MARGIN 50,000 198,244 14,800 25,200 5,991,467 6,700,187 6,700,187 9,772,450 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: HTG: DEPT: 8/14/90 PLNG TITLE: APPEAL NO. 5 PLOT PLAN 11756 DEPT CITY CITY MGR/~L Recommendation: 1. That the City Council UPHOLD the appellant's APPEAL, subject to the recommendations of the City Traffic Engineer, based on findings and analysis contained in the County report, and APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11756, based on the analysis and findings contained in the County staff report, subject to the conditions of approval as revised in APPEAL No. 5. APPLICATION INFORMATION DATE APPEAL FILED: June 22, 1990 APPELLANT: Ida Sanchez of Markham S Associates for Hawthorne Development R EPR ESENTAT I VE: Ida Sanchez, Markham F, Associates PR OPOSA L: An appeal for relief from a Condition of Approval placed on Plot Plan No. 11756, by the Riverside County Road Department. LOCAT I ON: Northeast corner of Business Park Drive and Rancho Way. EXISTING ZONING: M-SC Manufacturing Service Commercial SURROUNDING ZONING: North: M-SC South: M-SC East: M-SC West: M-SC Manufacturing Service Commercial Manufacturing Service Commercial Manufacturing Service Commercial Manufacturing Service Commercial SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Industrial Development Vacant Industrial Development Vacant STAFFRPT\APP5 BACKGROUND: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: Plot Plan No. 11756 is a proposal for a 155,523 square foot multi-building industrial park on approximately 9.1~ acres in the Rancho California Business Park. The project was tentatively approved at the County of Riverside Planning Directors hearing on May 21, 1990. The appeal for relief from County Road Conditions No. 1, 2, 3, ~, and 5 was filled with the Temecula Planning Department on June 22, 1990. Proposed 155,523 square foot Multi-bui Iding Industrial Park on approximately 9. lq acres. Area Settinq The project site lies within an existing industrial park development. The site has been rough graded. Project Description The proposed development entails 8 concrete tilt-up structures which predominately are composed of office and manufacturing. Parking has been adequately provided. Landscaping constitutes 22.08% of the site. The proposed project is approximately situated on 9.1~ acres. Appeal The applicant is appealing County Road Conditions No. 1, 2, 3, ~, and 5. County Road Condition No. 1 states: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the intersection of Front Street and California Road shall be improved to provide the following intersection geometrics, including any needed widening: Northbound - Southbound - Eastbound - Westbound - one right turn land, one left turn lane, two through lanes. one left turn lane, two through lanes. one left turn lane, two through lanes. one left turn lane, one right turn lane, two through lanes. County Road Condition No. 2 states: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the intersection of Interstate 15 Freeway southbound ramps and Rancho California Road shall be improved to provide the following intersection geometrics, including any needed widening: Southbound - Eastbound - Westbound - one left turn lane, one right turn lane. two through lanes, one right turn lane. two through lanes, one left turn lane. County Road Conditions No. 3 states: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the intersection of Kathleen Way l Business Park Drive West) and Rancho California Road shall be improved to provide the following intersection geometrics, including any needed widening: Northbound- one through lane, one left turn lane. Southbound- one through lane, two left turn lanes. Eastbound - two through lanes, one left turn lane. Westbound - two through lanes, one left turn lane. County Road Condition No. ~ states: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the intersection of Diaz Road and Rancho Way shall be improved to provide the following intersection geometrics, including any needed widening: Northbound - Southbound - Eastbound - two through lanes, one left turn lane. two through lanes. one right turn lane, one left turn lane. County Road Condition No. 5 states: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the intersection of Business Park Drive East and Rancho California Road shall be improved to provide the following intersection geometrics, including any needed widening: Northbound - one through lane, one right turn lane, one left turn lane. 3 Southbound - Eastbound - Westbound - one through lane, two left turn lanes. two through lanes, one left turn lane. one right turn lane, one left turn lane, two through lanes. Based on the appeal application, the appellant states that the County Road Department Conditions were derived from the Traffic Study and that the requirements were based upon regional traffic impacts and are not site specific. The appellant has proposed an alternative course of action based on the appeal application: The appellant recognizes that these improvements are needed at these intersections and is willing to accept a new condition to participate in the Road Benefit Fund in lieu of the proposed Riverside County mitigation measures. The Engineering Department agrees with the appellant~s appeal based on the analysis of the Transportation Engineering Report. Thus, the revised condition states that prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, if a fair and equitable share of the developer~s cost of transportation improvements has not yet been determined, the applicant shall agree to deposit $10,000.00 into a City established Road Benefit Fund. The City Engineer has evaluated the appellant~s Traffic Study and his recommendations are attached. In addition, because the improvements are already in place at the intersection referenced in Conditions 3 and 5, Staff recommends deletion of these conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. RA:ks That the City Council UPHOLD the Appellant~s APPEAL, subject to the recommendations of the City Traffic Engineer, based on findings and analysis contained in the County report, and APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11756, based on the analysis and findings contained in the County staff report, subject to the Conditions of Approval as revised in APPEAL No. 5. MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Gary Thornhill, Planning Director Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer~/f Kirk Willjams, Transportation Engineer August 6, 1990 REVISED CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 11756 Hawthorne Development through Markham and Associates, has submitted an Appeal to the Conditions of Approval set forth by the County Road Department dated April 11, 1990. The Engineering Department agrees with the appel lant~s appeal based on the analysis of the Transportation Engineering Report and recommends a revised Condition of Approval be added to replace the Appealed Conditions. The Revised Condition shall read: 1. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, if a fair and equitable share of the developerms cost of transportation improvements has not yet been determined, the applicant shall agree to deposit $10,000.00 into a City established Road Benefit Fund. The applicant shall also sign an agreement with the City to either pay additional funds or receive a refund equal to the difference between this estimated fair share amount and the amount of deposit with the City. The form of the agreement will be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. KW: ks cc: Richard Ayala, Planning Dept. Ida Sanchez, Markham ~; Assoc. STAFFRPT\APP5 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING REPORT APPEAL NO. 5 PLOT PLAN NO. 31756 R ECOMMEN DAT I ON That the City Council REVIEW AND CONSIDER a policy for addressing conditions of approval for traffic reports for new development projects. BACKGROUND The County of Riverside currently requires any development project that immediately impacts an intersection past the level of Service C I level of Service D at the peak hour) to be burdened with the total improvement of the intersection. This policy has resulted in the first development adjacent to an impacted intersection to be burdened with the full costs associated with improvements. In some cases the cost of these improvements would make the proposed development economically infeasible. In addition, the County~s policy has also created numerous projects with the exact same conditions of approval for improvements. The County~s policy does not recognize any relationship the level of impact to the level of improvements. It also does not create an equitable fair share basis to assure the improvements get constructed. For these reasons, Staff recommends that the following policy be adopted to address County approved projects which have been conditioned with specific mitigations. R ECOMME N DAT IONS The applicant post a performance bond equal to the cost of improvements listed in the mitigation requirements in the Traffic Study, prepared for the project at the time a building permit is issued. At the time that a Cerfiicate of Occupancy is issued, the applicant is required to deposit an areout of $10,000.00 to a newly approved City Road Benefit Fund. The Development Impact Fee Study currently being prepared by Willdan Associates will determine an equitable fair share of the developer~s cost of improving the intersection based on the number of vehicles which will be generated by the project. When the Development Impact Fee schedule is adopted by the City Council, the developer will either pay additional funds or receive a refund equal to the difference between the Development Impact Fee amount and the amount of deposit. STAFFRPT\APP5 RIVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDZTZONS OF APPROVAL hithome Develolxnent 23232 Peralia Neeoft Beach, CA 92653 PLOT PLAN NO. 11756/md.. #1 Pro:lectDescrtptton: To construct a mitt-Industrial park Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-020-062,063 DIstrict/Area: Temecula The use hereby pemttted by thts plot plan is for a multi-Industrial park.. The penntttee shall defend, Indemnify, and hold hamless the County of Riverside, tt agents, officers, and employees from any claims, actton, or proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, votd, or annul, an approval of the County of RIverside, tts advtsory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body t Gc action, or proceeding agalnst the County of Riverside and wtll cooperate fully in the defense. Zf the County fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such clatm, action or roceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee s~all not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold hamless the County of Riverside. This approval shall be used wtthtn two (2) years of approval date; other wise, tt shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use ts meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which ts thereafter diligently pursued to compleUon, or the beginning of substantial uttltzaUon contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall confore substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A hnd. #1, or as amended by these conditions. Zn the event the use hereby pemttted ceases operation for a pertod of one (1) year or more, this approval shall become null and void. Any outside ltghttng shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the County Road Department's transmittal dated 4-11-gO,a copy of which is attached. PLOT PLAM RO. %%756 Cmdtttms of Approval page 2 8. Nater and sewerage dtsposal facilities shall be Installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated 4-9-90, a copy of which ts attached, 9. Flood protection shall be provtded tn accordance wtth the Riverside County Flood Control Dtstrtct's transmtttal dated 4-10-90, a copy of which ts attached. 10. Ftre protection shall be provtded in accordance with the appropriate sectton of Ordinance NO. 546 and the County Ftre Warden's transmtttal dated 4-11-90, a copy of whtch is attached. 11. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Building & Safety - Land Use Section's transmittal dated 4-11-90, a copy of which is attached. 12. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Building and Safety - Grading Section's transmittal dated 4-13-90, a copy of which is attached. 13. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be i permitted to grow higher than th rty (30) inches. 14. Prior to the issuance of buildin permits, seven (7) copies of a Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and ~hading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus,species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance 348. 15. A minimum of 346 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 346 parking spaces shall be rovided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A Amd. ft. The parking shalV be surfaced wit asphal i paving to area h t c concrete minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base. PLOT PLAN NO. 11756 Cmdtttons of Approval page 3 6. A minimum of 16 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit A ~md. #1. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of ai~f Accessibility, The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum i of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be osted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street par~ing facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning ." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 17. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Road Department Environmental Heal th Building & Safety - Grading Riverside County Flood Control Fi re Department Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety. Naterials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit N-2 (Color Elevations) and Exhibit N-1 (Naterials Board). These are as follows: Naterial Col or Siding Concrete tilt-up Nullion ~inish Aluminum Windows Glass Dunn-Edwards Q-8-36P Swiss Coffee Dunn ~dwards Q-B-36P Swiss Coffee Sapphire Blue 19. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. PLOT PLAR NO. 11756 Conditions of Approval page 4 20. Twelve (12) trash enclosures whtch are adequate to enclose a total of twelve (12) bins shall be located within the project, and shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy pemits. Each enclosure shall be six feet tn he1 ht and shall be made wtth masonry block and a gate which screens the btns :~ran external vtew. 21. Landsca e screening destgned to of stx ~6) feet. shall be be opaque up to a mintmum hetght 22. Landscaping plans shall ~ncorporate the use of spedmen canopy trees along streets and w~thtn the parktng areas. 23. All street l~ghts and other outdoor 11ghttng shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Bu~ldtng and Safety for plan check approval and shall canply w~th the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No, 655 and the R~vers~de County Comprehensive General Plan, 24. This pro~ect is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to tssuance of any butldtng pemit by the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety, a California Ltcensed Structural Engtneer shall certtfy that the tntended structure or butldtng is safe and structurally tritegrated. This certification shall be based upon, but not be limited to, the site specific setsmtc, geologic, and geotechntcal conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or ftssure development is detemtned to extst, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated. 25. Prtor to the tssuance of grading pemtts, the appl 1cant shall canply wtth Ordinance No. 663 by paytrig the fee requtred by that ordinance whtch ts based on the gross acreage f h o t e parcels proposed for development. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provisions of a Habttat Conservation Plan prtor to the payment of the fees requfred by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee requtred under the Habttat Conservation Plan as Implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 26. Etght Class Z! btcycle racks shall be provtded tn convenient locations to facilitate btcycle access to the project area. 27. Prtor to the tssuance of butldtng pemlts, performance securities, tn amounts to be detemlned by the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety to guarantee the installation of planttn s, walls, and fences tn accordance wtth the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planttrig for one year, shall be ftled wtth the Department of Butldtng and Safety. 28. Prtor to the tssuance of occupancy pemtts, all requtred landscaped planttn and Irrigation shall have been Installed and be tn a condition acceptable to the Dtrector of Butlding and Safer . The plants shall be y ;~ good worktng order. PLOT PLAR IlO. 11756 Cmdtttms of Approval page 5 8e 2e Prtor to the tssuance of occupancy penntts, all requtred landscaped planttn and trrttgaetton shall have been Installed and be tn a condition AeandThe 1ants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests shall be properly constructed and in good worktrig order. All utilities, except electrical 11nes rated 33kV or greater, shall be Installed underground. Prior to the sale of any structure as shown on Exhtbtt A Red. #1, a land division shall be recorded tn accordance wtth RIverside County Ordinance No. 460 and any other pertinent ordfnance. Prior to any use allowed by thts plot plan, the applicant shall obtatn clearance from the Departcent of Butldtng and Safety - Land Use Sactton that the uses found on the subject property are in conromance wtth Ordinance No. 348. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complled wtth prtor to occupancy or any use allowed by thts permtt. GG:kcb 4-20-90 County OI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH O: E~IVERGIDE COUNTY PLANNIN~ DEPT. DATE: -- ATTN: Clcr~a Gunman 1aM; ~!~aj'{,,7~'~'Z"~,ronmental Health ~pecxalist Iv 4 Plot Plan f~,mvironmen~al Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan 11756. Amended No. I dated ADr~I 5. 1990. Our current co,n;t, ez, t~ will remain as stated %n our memo dated Narcl~ 14, l'~gO. S1'4: wd 3 &~rlZ 11, 1990 Riverside County Planning Cm~lssion 4080 Le~n Street Riverside, CA 92501 ( Zndustrl~l Center ) YZot Plan 11756 - &mend Tozm 5 - SXD #9 AP 1111-111-111-9 Ladles and Gentlemarts The Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the traffic study submit~ed by Xunzman Associates for the above referenced pro ect. The s=ud7 has been prepared in accordance with eccelM:ed traffic engineering standards and practices, utlltsing County app,--oved guidelines. We generally concur with tba findings relative to traffic lmpncta. The study Lndicates a proJoc~ed Level of Service *C* at Front Street and Rancho Ca/ifornia Road, with improvements. The ~lve General Plan cJ_~culation policies relative to the Southwest Area C~neunity Plan states that a miattmum of Level of 8errIce" "is necessaz7 for any new land use. As such, the D proposed project is consis~ent with this General Plan policT. The followlr~ conditions of approval incorporate ml=Lgatton seesures identified in the .traffic study, which ire ae~esssr~ to echieve or sa~ntain the zequired level of servicet Prior to the issuance of occupancy pemiu, the intersection of Pront Sixset and California Road shall be to provide the follceing intersecuton geose~rics, any nea'aed wtd~n~qg~ Eastbound - Westbound - ~ne right turn Jane, one left turn "' lane, two through lanes. one left turn lane, two through one left turn lane, two through lanes. one left turn lane, one right turn lane, two through lanes. COt~T~~~~, 4010LD, KmSlltZZt, IWla$1~. ~~SOI Page 2 Prior to the issuance O~ lmlldJJ~ pezmit2, the l~tetsection of Interstate 15 Say southbound ramps and Rancho California'Road shall be/zproved to provide the following intersection gecsetrics, Including any needed w~bn~s one left turn lane, one tight turn lane. two through lanes, ene fight turn lane. two throggh lanes, ene left turn lane. P:ior to tre issuance oZ occupancy petetits, the ~nt~tsection of Xathleen Wa (Business Park Drive West) and Rancho Cali forala Road shalt be improved to provide the following ~ntersectlon gecewtrlcs, ~nclud~ng any needed Souf~bound - netbound - Westbound - one through lane, ~ne left turn lane. one through lane, two left turn lanes. two through lanes, one left turn two through lanes, one left turn lane. Prior to the issuance of occupant7 per~=e, the Intersection of Dlaz Road and Ranthe Way shall be Jz roved to provide ~he felltying intersection geomeUtics, ~nc~utding any nssdsd wtder~.n~s ~crthbound - two through lanes, lane. two through lanes. eae right turn lane, lane. one left ~ one left turn l~lot to the issuance of occupancy parmira, the lntersec~ien of' Business !ark Drive East and Xancho California P~sd shall be ~ to provide the following lntersect~on gecesttlcs, ~nclading any needed v~xhu~ngs 2oufJlbound - lutboLmd - WestJ~uncl - o~e tJ~t~mg~ lane, one tight lane, one le~t turn lane. one through lane, t~o left turn lanes. t~ ~~ l~s, ~ left l~e. em r~ght t~ lu, o~ left 'Apt11 II, 1990 Page 3 II~th teslsct t~ the conditions o! approval ~ot the applicant provide the following street bs~ro~ts, stzeet .t d lspxwesen plans and/or ros dedications In accordance Ckdfiunce 460 and Ittverside County Road Xs~ovemont 2tandazds (Ot~4te~e 461 . It JJ mxle.Ts~ chat the exhibAt cor:ectly shoe a]~ exist~t~g euemnts; traveled ways, and dFttna~e cottses vith epL~zc~t~ate. O's, and t jut theft oreLesion or my ~ the m; to be testtm~tted for furthe= conaidetatJ~n. describe the conditions for a complete des1 of the s Fz~or to Issuance of a building permlt or shy use allcesd by this petxtt, the applicant shall cceplete the following conditions at no cost to any government No addtt~onal r~ght of ray shall be resulted on Business ~szk Drive sad ltancho Way since adequate. :lght oZ way exists. Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed this permit, the developer shall deposit vith the ~verslde County Road Deperr~ent the sum of $18,322.S0 Tltts amount re_pX'esenU 10.47 acres x $1,750.00 per g~OeS 32 acze - 818, 2.50. :P:lo~ to occ or any use allowed by titis following luslness Pazk DriVe and Xancho Nay shall be ~ w~th 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement v/thin a 45 Zoot lmrt wlcl~h dsd~csUsi zLght of vsy J~ accordance with County St-sdeTd leo. 111. ( :28'/39' ) isphalt essls~on (fog seal) shall be s~lLed not less then fottr~oen das following piecement of the asphalt surfacing and shal~ be a lied at s rate of 0.05 gallon per square ud. asphalt eNdSion shall congore to Section 37, 39 and ~4 of the SCare ST. andanS Specifications. 2~n~-~d 35 foot curb x'eZurn, cross tre:, spand:~ ~ ~tnan~ 461 v~ a~llc~le. · Apt11 11, 1990 Pip 4 Six foot vide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along SusLness Park Drive and Pancho Way in accordance v~th County 2?andard No. 400 and 401 (curb s/Jewalk}. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a mtn4w,m of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignrant as approved by the lttverside County Road CcemissLonsr. Completion of load ~wleents does not imply acceptance fo: main- tena~e by County. Eraimage control shall be as pe: Ordinance 460, 2action 11.1. a/1 work done viibin Count-/:lght of way shall have an encroachment per~Lt. All driveways shall County Standards /mp~G~!enC plans. conform to and shall the appl lcable Rivers ida be shown on The street all entrance driveways shall be channelized viuh concrete curb and gutter ~o prevent 'back-on' parking and interior drives from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum disvance of 35 feet ~easured frc~ face of curb. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coorcLtna~ed with PM 19580. Street lighting shall be zequired in accordance with Or~4~nce 460 and 461. The County Service Area (CSA) JLdminis~rator detarmines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, ~he land miner shall file, After ~c~4v4ng for an application with LM~ for annexation into or czeation of a 'Lighting Assessment Dls~ric~' fix accordance wi~h GovernmenTal Code 8action 56000. PRr~ the landowner shall receive and provide a Cer~lfica~e of Cc~pletion trim LAFCO. all r~vtte tad public entrances and/or inrarsections c~pos[~e this lro:Jec~ hall be oordinated with this project tad shown on v~e s~reet Lmp~nt plans. a striping plan is required for Pancho Way. The zerooval of the existing stripin shall be the tee lbl3J. ty of applicant. Traffic s[ g and striping s~l be done by County farces with ~?~ cosus borne by the applicant. 'Ploz'Plan 11756 -Amend Apt11 li. 1990 Page 5 Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall ccmpl wXth Road De nt standards end require e~proval by ~ ~oed C~ss~s~r and assurance of continuing maintenance through the es=abl~shsen~ of a Zands~ape s~tnranance d~euv~c~/maintenance e~eemen= or s~milar machan:i. sm as oved b~ the Road Cce~t esLoner. Landscape plans shall ~ sub~tvad on standard Court1: Plan shee~ forsat (24" x 36'). Lendscape plans shell L sulm~t~ed with ,r. bs street improvement plans and shall depict ~ such landscaping, irrigat~on and related facilities as ere to be placed w~thin the public road tights-of-ray. Sincerely, KIJ~'/NLIDW~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Imn~RsmOL G&UF~NiA ~&~,OZ Riverside County P1 ann1 ng Department County Administrative Center Rivers ida, Cali forni a Attention: Regional Team No. Me have rev~e.ed this case and have the fo]3~ng c~nts: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- Courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the 1 natural watercourses for but dang sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood dmmage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches ·bore adjacent )round surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports. lhts project is in the "' drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~lesArea and regulations. The proposed Zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the Implted density. The Otstrict's report dated ~-~,:3-~(:) is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. This project is · part of . The project will be free of ordinary s orm flood~ azard when improvements have been constructed in t h accordance with approved plans. The attached comments apply. truly you-s ~J)HN H. ~entor Civil Engineer DATE: tt~ [iv, tO.(xtq 0 KENNETH L F_DV~ARD5 1995 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 1033 TELEPHONE (714) 787-2015 FAX NO. (714) 788-9965 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CAUFORNIA 92502 Riversidc Count)' Planning. Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No.. ~.: .... P1 anner 6'u~v/,~ . ..: ?? Area Ne have reviewed this case and have the following comments: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area conststs of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." This project is in the drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~lesArea and regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards· Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The District's report dated is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change· This project is a part of _7'_z~ /9,-~oPO The project will be free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvemen{~'have been constructed ih accordance with approved plans. v"' The attached comments apply· CO: V y .truly yoir, s/ OHI~ ~.~U~A\ 'or Civil ngineer DATE: The County Board of Supervisors has adopted the ~V/Z~/67W (~F~T/ 7~/~ ~/~ ' Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of collecting Ir~Yanage fees. Those fees are used to construct needed flood control facilities within the particular area. The Area Drainage Plan fees apply to new land divisions and other types of new development. ~ Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff. These increases are particularly troublesome in those watersheds where an Area Drainage Plan has been adopted. In order to miti- gate the downstre.am impacts brought about by increased runoff, the District recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans and Public Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation charge. Mitigation charges, where appropriate, will be similar to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate. Following is the District's recommendation: A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The new development in this case includes a total of q.~ acres. At the current fee rate of $ ~2.,e per acre, the mitigation charge equals $ ~/~/.'~ The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prio~ to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Mitigation Charge (mitcharg) IJemo. cAezz0~ 4)LL~t J, NBWblAN In. mS CHI~ Fie ~ D O ~ A INGZNIBK~; JfdO tfi'H rrRllT fit4} With respect to the sendirises of approval relerdtnS the above referenced plot plan, the 7~re Departmet rosesmends the following fire pzoteettou maeuroe be provided tn accordance lr~th liversida Cmdnty Ordinances and/or teeetA/sod fire protection etu~fardef the Y~re Departaerie le required to eel a s~tnisnm fire f~w for the remode~ oz constr~ction of 811 emzcie~ bulldido ~inl the pro:ed~e eecib~Ie~ed ~di~ce 546. JI ~rovida or show there exists a eager eyeCam ~epable of deliver~nl lSOO GP~ for a 2 hour duration at JO PSI residual operettas treasure, ~hlch smec be available before ~y c~cib~e mnrt~ is pieced on the ~ob e~ee. A ecebLaaC~on of on-site end off-aiceJuper fire hydrants, on · ~ooped eyetea (6'~4"x2|~2|), viii be ioeaged not ion than ~/eat or mrs than ~65 feat fm anT:Nr~ of the bu~ld~nl u muur~ ~ont eppzwd vehicular treystrays. ~e required fire f~ eke~ be avetXebXa frm ny ~aeent.hydrue(e) ~ ~e spots, Appliesrig/developer ehall furnish one copy of the eager eyetea p~ane to the Wire Del~rtmut for review, ff~au oh11 eo~o~ co the rite hydrau~ t, ee, ~etton e~ epaotq. ~0 gb eyeca ebalX met the fire fiow requ/zmnts. elm a~l be e~nd/~prmv~ by e ~eltecered civ~ eqJ~e6r ~ the 1o:~ water e~an7 with the fo11~ egretfleeting "Z mortify that ~e dee~u of ~e ~tor eyeBe 18 b scootdane with the requtrmnco ~eecr~ by ~e ~veroMe bury re, bpermnt.' bnd~ a seaplate fire eprtnk%ar r/e;ra 1n a11 Im/Xdtnle requiria8 a fire fl~ of ~ ~ or ~er. ~ ~a; ~teatoz valve ~ fire d~erm~c c~eic~on ~aXX k Zooec~. to ~ front, ~tb~ SO fe,~ of a hydr~c, e~ a ~~ of ~ feeC f~m fie bulbdiSCs). i b: ~e bu~diqCs) v~ be ~smg~e~y fire epr~ered mC be Znsts~l s supervised vacerflovmon~sortnl firs s~srm system, FleAs muse bs required by the thlforu'B~i~d~u8 Code. 8.. i eastsane that the buildtul.wi~Z be sucomstics~ly fire Sprtu~sred suet appear on the cites pals'of :he buildinS plan. .. luL3dltnt Code. :. ~ · lO, Certain desfaulted areas el~1 be requited 16 be taMgained as fits lanes. Prior to issuance o~ bglldlM permits, the appliesat/developer sha~l 'be rsepousib~e to submit s ~hs~k o~smasy order ~n the mount of $4%3,00 co gh, Uverstds Canoe7 rL:, DopefeRric fog p~ ~e~ fees, Pr~or :o the issuance of bul~dinl permits, the developer shsZ: dsposi; I,Ath the glverslde County ~Lrs )spar,sue, s ~hso~ or Busy order squab:fiE ~s ;~c us= be subSclod ssDsrsceZy fr= ~s p~lu e~ek rev~ev fee, · : .. ., i. Le, ra ~sbra~, l~ro Jarely IJM~tsZtst cDepa tt e.t cgut &g at d ga elL t 'Administrative Offlos, 1777 Atlanta Avenue RIverside, CA 92507 April 11, 1990 Riverside County Planning Department Attentions Jeff Adems County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 REI Plot Plan 11756, Exhibit A, Amend~ No. I (Fast. Track) Ladies and Gentlemen, The Land Use Division of the Department of Building'and Safety has the following comments and conditions, An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site signage will be required~ If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review. If the proposed project im to be "phased," an approved exhibit indicating which structures and on-site improvements are required for each "phase" ehou½d be required. Prior to issuance of bulading permits, proposed lighting must be. in conformence with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan. Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety review. one complete set of approved conditions from Planning Department must be attached. % Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval. Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance is required from the following, . % · Temecula Valley Unified School District Sincerely, Vaughn Sarkisian Land Use Technician tt/vS (7141 682-8840, (714) 275-1820, Fax (714) 3694084 (IXINTY OF RIVERSIDE BUILDING AND ~ DEP~ GRAI)ING 5'~CTION TO: PLANNING GLDRIA (tlZMAN FROM: TONY HARMON DATE: 4/13/90 RE: P.P. 11756 AMD. 1 APN: 921-020-062,068 APR 19 1990 RIVER$iD~ COiji,tT"/ pLANNING DEPARTMENt' The "Gradir~ Section" has reviewed a conceptual ~radin~plan for this site. The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Gradir~ Section" recommends approval of this project If the followin~ conditions are included. Prior to commencir~ any~radtng in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a Zradin~ ~ermit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety department. All ~radin~ shall conform to chapter 70 of the Uniform Buildin~ Code as amended by Ordinance 457. Prior to issuance of any bullding permit, the property owner shall obtain a Sradin~ permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Plant and trrlgate all slopes greater than or equal to 3 'in vertical height with grass or ~round cover. Slopes that exceed 15°in vertical hei~hth are to be provided with shrubs and/or trees per county ordinance 457, see form 284-47. Gradin~ in excess of 199 cubic yards will require 'performance security to be posted with the Buildir~ and Safety department. In instances where a Sradin~ plan involves import or export, prior to obtaining a ~rading permit, the applicant shall have obtained approval for the import/export location from the Buildtn~ and Safety department- this may require a written clearance from the Planning Department. A recorded drainage easement is required for the proposed lot to lot drainage. All drainage facilities shall be dest~ned to accommodate 100 year storm flows. The proposed retainin~ walls, shown on the conceptual 2fading plan, will require separate permits and shall be designed by a registered civil engineer - unless they conform to the County Standard Retaining Wall designs shown on BuildinS and Safety Department form 284-197. Obsez~s slope setbacks per. 2eo~ton .2)07, :~tgur~ 29-1 2ectton 7011, end Figure '.70-.1 o~ -the Uniform Bulldtn~ Code. VICINITY MAP 't. fm 81TE-'~ 'F~° /¢pPEz¢ .,// NORTH CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT ABI: MTG: DEPT: FINANCE TITLE: REVISE RESOL U I IUN ,~u-U,z ALLOWING CITY MANAGER TO PREPA Y DEMAND PAYMENTS LESS THAN # 1,000 DEPT HDMJ Henry CiTY ATTY ~ CITY HGR RFCOMMENDA TION: That the City Council adopt Resolution 90- to revise Resolution 90-02 to allow the City Manager to prepay demands that are less than ~ 1,000. DISCUSSION: On January 9, 1990, the City Council adopted resolution 90-02 allowing the City Manager to prepay payroll demands and to prepay any demand, where, in his discretion, he determines that such prepayment is necessary for the efficient management of City business. Staff recommends that the wording be revised to allow the City Manager to prepay demands that are less than $1,000. This revision will better facilitate accounts payable processing for small and recurring vendors without jeopardizing Council's control over ~~ / si nificant e penditures. FISCAL IMPACT: · None. ' A TTA CHMFN T.' Resolution 90- . RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE FOR PREPAYMENT OF DEMANDS. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, the City Manager may pre-pay demands, prior to audit by the City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 37208 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 3.16.060; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to establish a procedure for such prepayment of demands: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Except as specifically provided in Section 2, no demands may be paid prior to the performance of an audit by the City Council as required by Section 3.16.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Upon completion of the City Council's audit, the Council may direct the City Manager to issue a check, which must be signed by at least two of the following officials: A. Mayor; B. Mayor Pro Tern; C. City Manager; D. City Treasurer; E. Finance Officer; provided however, that no one individual may sign on behalf of more than one office. SECTION 2. The City Manager is expressly authorized to prepay City employee payroll demands, and further, to prepay any demand where, in his discretion, the City Manager determines that such prepayment is necessary for the efficient management of City business and any demands less than $1,000. Prior to issuing any check for the prepayment of any demand, the City Manager shall present the demand to the Finance Officer (or City Clerk if no Finance Officer has been 4~RESOS\91 08108190 appointed) for certification as in conformance with the City's budget. Upon certification by the Finance Officer, the City Manager may issue a check, which must be signed by at least two of the officials listed in Section 1, provided, however, that no one individual may sign on behalf of more than one office. Should the City Clerk fail to certify the demand as in conformance with the City's budget, no check shall be issued until the demand has been audited by the City Council as provided in Section 1. SECTION 3. This Resolution is expressly intended to supersede those provisions of Resolution No. 89-20 regarding the signing of checks. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTF. D this 14th day of August, 1990. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATrEST: June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] 4XRE$OSX91 08/08/90 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLI~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTMN CLMMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of $330,993.47. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 14th day of August, 1990. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] 4/R~o,/95 08/08/90 r~ II ~ II · II ¢'~ II ¢:~ II a~ II - II o II ¢'n II ¢'~ II ! 0 L 13 I~ L U U UI E G O U -IJL) ~O L 0 m 'O U m 0 S> > r O~ 0~ -.., ,I il 0 >- 0~ · U 0 U ~ :~., o o o o o c, o o o o o o o o o ,", C, ,D O O 0 C. 0 C, C, ,', C, O 0 C, .5 d d c; d d d d d d d d d d d c: d 1 j~ ~ ~ -- , '~ I J I,u ~ ~ J ~ Z ~Z>t 0 ~ 0 ~ O ~ UJ'C' ~ 0 ~ u ~ ~ U I Zhh~ u O O0 ~0 -00 ~0000000 >00 ZO OO ~00 ~0 ,00 J Z 'J JO0 ~0 O0 ZOOOOOOO O0 ~0 ~00 JO000000 OO 0 OO OOOOOOO ~ Z J Z O~l D~ I~O Ohl OO Oh~ OOO~O00 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. L · L ~ Q~ :~,+J U ~n EE ~ ,.pv O U h') E') O O O O O O' I'~ 'K~ 0' O' O. ':' q' ',t O O O O: b') b') ("'I :("1 O O O I'~ I~. O O 'O '0 O O: q' ~ Ifi If) O O QD O) O. O O O li') b3 fil '("1 ,C' O V) C O u wI C 01 0 ; r-, n W U r",, r, r, x t- _IC, .JO' I ,','C. >-~ ,~'-. nr,. · ou I-.- c..,., _1 113 ~"-> CI,',C. Oh.. ': I0",0 O O O O O O O O O O C., O O O O O O O O O O O O: O: O O O. JO O C, O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O- O O O O b'l I~I 0 0 0 0 ,D 0 t"J to O- O- 0 0 ~' ' ~' 0 0 0 0 b'l b'l C-I t..:, t<, o o -0 -0 ,D o ~ ,~- u'~ b'} C, C, m CO O O O O bl bl ~.l e0 ~ ~ ~ q' ~i' f-1 fq II1 b') O- 0' q' ~' m C0 O O ,D O t-9 r,) 0- iN I~. ~ ~ ~' q' [,I C"I O O 0' O' ~ --~ ~ -'~ I"~ t') ~"1 C..I 11'1 ~ -r L3 h Z 0'~ U) ILl .-J u w c z m r ~ U_ )., (.0 ILl LLI C:I Z h v LLI 'r Z ~ W r? O ~- r? ~. 0 O Q LL L1 ~ ~ I;:1 IN C3 q' LL ~ ¢r .J L0 K][: ',- LL Q1 '~ O LU ~ W W Z t" ~ ~: "'r W t-- 3 P -J Z r Jl w ~ z ~ o ~o ; ~ ~ ~,',' ~ ~ ~ ~ . LJ x O L) L'L. UJ 0 ~ 0 U 0 I;1 0 0 0 0 i~ 0 Z 0 t- 0 LL O 0 W 0 ~ 0 Ld 0 .J I-- Z I-- ~ I-- (.0 I- 0' h- Z I- rr' h- Z F- h. W ~- -r F- W I,- ) I-- Lq _.1 <Z f.,q Z -~. ,-4 <I W ~ LQ r.j n- O 01 rr u ~ u W U ~ u (N U u u u ~ U F.- U O U <]: U b3 u ~ L1 '-' (_1 ~ L3~_J L) O (J U. L) m:L Ur',~C (_1 O) L1 m:L rj .,-, L1 Lm. U UJ Z O [00 0 ~ 0 0 0 O ~ O 0 'D 0 0 C' C' ~' hm 0 g~' h Z--' O t-'., 0 q' 0 m o ~o >-o zo o oo o e:o o o o o zo o w' rt Z I LU Z LI ,..4 :3 W 01 J ~ N W ' J ;j'J Z rrto Ol~ ~ rr ' · <1: Z F O ,D rr ~1 m ~ ' 'r <I ~O W~ 'r'O rJl ~0 LIO :..:. 0 LIO O0 ,D n,'O 0 '~0 0 n'O 21'-O 0 WO' rr'O- ':WO' :0' TO- P~O' 00" 00" · tO- WO' NO- fi"~l OOf:.'!t/L~h- t'-h ,q[:.,-m .,4,--~ C),-.m tJ,,O %~'3 ttl'tj Qlq'' .: ,-0 Zrn W-~ (.rjt',E,~ ¢ZC'4 I'-BI fro <1:0 ZO Z'," ~0 0,.4. ILl ' : <X:h rrh ': Jr,- Q.h. : glQ3 ' (JCO '~II1 rr'p, Nm ~p, ~m ':.::}¢.<[r~ UP'. O 0 '::: 0 .0 O 0 O 0 O ~O 0 ~'~::! '0 0 Z UJ .;is I.L :E:?; I-- fi" <I: I~ .. ::: (i: L) , O O n, I-- 01 '5' L .'::).. O g 1.3:': .: ~. T P9 ' O 0 :: : r. W · : ,,, ~ :,.Z:; :::{ ::> ::.u ,t co = w co · ~: O.: O ::E . ~ I-,::: ::- </: ~ a U :~,- fi' : · I,q ' L) W 01 ~ .1 <I: O E::~, ::~:' ,Y O ' ': <C O Z O '! Z O . 01 O O : L · .:, J ~ O ::i ~ 0- re:o- ,-, o, ~ o- z o, .w ' J m zo-.'-, ::~.:;,::uo- ":: '~':08 =g' - c.': u o,,- o,'-::: ~::o,-, o,,-~, -m } om om o,,-': om 04- ; o,-,. :o,0 or,, 0-o'! ~- ::;:' 0' 0 .:: ~:i:~ 0 O'O!.:' 0 O' O O u m 0 U.. I O00 O O0 0 O0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 00000 0 OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, 0 0 000 0 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 OC, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F9 t.9 ~I z ~ z w m w mwo~ ~> j z F~ 0 ~g 0 ~ 0 ¢ O ~ 0 g 0 ¢Z Z¢ 0 ¢¢ 0 W 0 0 W 0 Z 0 000 -O,D O0 0 0 ~0 O,DO,DC, O0 0 0 'D 0 OOO OO O0 ~0 0 ~0 ~O00C:O O,D 0 0 0 ~0 - ~ ~o w mo oo ~ o~ooo oo mo ~ z oo x GO0 ~00 ¢00 WO WO 0 O00,DO O0 0 ~0 ~0 ZO.J OOO ZOO O0 0 0 0 00000 :° O0 0 0 '0 0 N ~ D . : Z W ,~ C~ 0 ~ ~ I > Z Z · .<J~ Z: O '::::Z ~fi W $0 O0 J ~O. ~ ~ ~0 D~~ >,,, ¢ xO '::~ ~' OnO ~ ~0~ ~0::::~0 ".~0 ~ -: O-- 0 , , :: ~ ::::: :: :: ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'- 0 O' 0: :: 0 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 O: : 0:;' 0 ~ O 0 0 O O o o,o:o o o o oo . 0., 0 : O 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ::>': 0 ~,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0::: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OS ~1~1- -I-I- ~1-1- ~1;1: :1=1~ =l:l~lal~l~l; ~1=1~ =1~1~ ~1~1~ :1~1~ ~1~1~ ~1;[= ~1=1~ ~1~1~ ~lsl; :1:1~ ~1~1'~ Cl ~ C ~ ,~ .~, ,~. -~ ,~ , ,: .... , ~ ) ,) ) · 'L | I I r-I.l,l~ -Io1~1- I I · · ' i'll,gt'.' C',I t'~ 1'9 OB,rh O f'.l ('4 O.-' ""' h h --,K, ('4 m ~ IFJ tO tO l"~ ['O, -8 .O O O C,o~o o o o ooo o o o Oo o 0 o oo~o ~ o o o o o o o o o o .:. 0~0 0 0 0 ~00 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 OOuO 0 0 0 ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U hhf'4 h ~ ~ q'(:O-O 0' O O "'40 ['4 ~ q' hb"'lC. CO ~ ~ ...0 h h h h 1'9 t.9 -O ,0 113 tO I") l'l 1'6 F'.~ ~ ~t' h O C'I 61 C' ,-' ~ h -'~ 1'9. e-I I11 b3 iil tO tO l'9 1'9 -0 -0 O ffl .-. q .t O' t'9 r'., h ,o O m M O .0 ,4:1 C'l ('t m 130 --' .-~ ~'1 IN tO O ,Y 0 ~ ~1 I-- [:::1 .D ¢ ~:: >' O' h rr' 'O D' 0 .(..:1 I-- 0 O B. LLI >' ZZ LL , W _J ,u ,',' ,~ m oo I ~ w ~ ~ I m ~ uw , ,u z ~ m L--, I-1- .u r .u .u s- .u _lZ 4J .E .u ,',-rr ~ 4-, ~ .u Z ,,u .... O ~ 13 rr'UJW O "~ O .'-'O O '-' O ~ O O I.LI O Z O "" O LIJ O O~ IIIWW I-- W I- Ldrr'~Y I- W h ~1' I- W h WWWW h h .Y h m I-- W I- W I- W'. t--~-h U ¢ u ~.~1- u ¢ U Z>* U ¢ u ~WLU¢ U ¢ U ~ U U ~ U U r, CLL'L g li U rJ:i:r~ U b. U "'~ n tL g I:Z:I:h L1 LL nW~J U ¢ n II g ~ rj ). r- 0,3 ~D 0 O '0 0 0 ~ ~ iZ o o o ~o odo o ooo o I. LO' Ch 0" 0'. G .. ~ ~ o----- - '-' " "'\ , ~- o- - " O 00 O ,-(> O 0 0 0 ,O 0 O O0 0 0 .J 0 0 0 -0 W 0 Z >~ LL ~ Z <I: :> E O I rJl I- Z W ' 'IO ._. Bi:,0m O v j 7'0- Z~ Z "- U W P'~ '~ eq ~ ,:3: <I: O ~4 </: ,~ 3: ,.~ n, F-¢,-0-0' W -r 0 rr ~ JO. Z I-- 0 n- IL 'US W i- :Z 000 O OOO n'O O0 ~0 ~O0.DO 0 ¢0 ¢0 ~30 uK~ 0 4~ O-,Or.9 n-q- t-.,t41Nt',l W~': ~,I~ t-,cr n',OMK:).t Wet WID W(,I ¢q' n'O0 Z~I"~ ~ .~-...~ 1'-. 0'-'~ D~.. I-'~'-- >'- <~'~"""' 0'- Z'-, Z"* ,=:)"- .'.- hhh ~?n (Dhhh "~ID 81,..rn Urn -rhhh00 ,-jn'm ~h ~h '(J)~ "-~h r 000 0 t-- ' " >- I-- I-- ~ ¢ U- h,tq' L1 W ::~. v ~ ~l:.~ 0 ~ ¢ ?'' ;.r, Jl W T W W n' .,.: >> .81".O n' OI")4)BI rf I.-I~0' ': ¢ ¢ChO'O' ;: n- rl,9 ~ZO' 0 ECI~ C h ~ 0~ IL ¢ ~ 04 &',l O0 ~ ¢.~ ~::.::!.(.0 0 ,-' ,<. T' ¢ -r -0 t':, 0 ¢ Z ¢ ,.-, O0 ,..-, .4) ~ ¢ ,-~ t,4 ~ ~1 14 t.9 LI ',0 ,,0 II1 t,1 :-i ,i O 0 [.J ,-~ L't I4 Ct Ij -I:1 O' f,;I F) · OOO .O'-' OOOO O....::::::O_.lm O'-' Ohhh'-' O"'~ O/Q OO O"" Oh Oh" -~- .... I,r.,t,t e'LL 0""~"" O'LL::: ;.O-hOL:.:O'LL e'OOOLL 0'U. 0'm O'U . O'LL 0'1'9 · ,.,, , · '~ ~ -T, ;:" :~ '- :-" "" ' m .!:.m m m , o o " o::~ o :: o o o o o ~o: o o. K, h9 1'9 Y) I~., · O U ' m ' I O O O: O O O ': O O O . O O O -. ~ .i ,". in :.C · I O O :,::'! O O O O · ~, O O O ::O'. O O m -H r.J I O O O .:' O .O O ; O O O O;;,: O O OIL I O O O O O O ' :!I O O O ::O ~. O · O ,::! ~:: '~] ._..,..,.,..,.,..,=,.- =,-.,.- -,--,. --,.t: ...,= .,.,'- '-..,. ""'" : .---~_~ ...... :... : t m C 0 U m $ E L "~ u C 0- ~ ..~ ~. O 0 0 C, C, 0 0 0 OOOC, 0 C,o 0 O 0 O0 0 OO 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 OOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O00C, 0 O0 0 0 0 O0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OOC, 0'. 0 ,,,, (.j 0 <I: Z m,i I.s] ill L ..i U~ 0 ~ ~l.d C..) ~ LL LU Z _1 I-- n :::3 I.-- L1 rJ3,'~ _1 Ld LU .J ILl LI(',I :~ ~C_1 .,.4 Z Z rrLU U.In LU H~ r. OZ 'r 9' LU I:',,i LL W fJ ~LL C) r~ I- LUZ 1-: · q: tO0 Zcrj :~ ZCJ ~ O h 0 U O ~ 0 ~U ~ O ~ O ~ 0 W~ O ~ O ~ O Z O Z O W ~0 I-O- ZO 0 LL ..J r~ 0 OOOO 0 ~0000 :W OOOO0 0 0 O. O, .~. q' 0 -,. .~. 0 . 0 O0 0 00 ZOO 0 O0 ~0 O0 O0 0 I ZO 0 ~ ~'! ~0 Z : ~ ~ ~::~' ~ 3. ::: ~ ~ :;0>0 0 O0 O0 0 J - : ~ J m :~ 0 ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~0. O ZOo WOO ~ O~~ O~ O~h O~h O~ ~,'0~ ~ ~00:::~00 :~ 0-:' 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 000 O, O- O'C)-~. ,0 O -'~ r.'.~ ,D ~ 0 'OO "'~C'~"-' LUO ZO ' OOO ~ I-- LLI ~ t':, ..: rr h "':: O. ~ O O 0: mO i:t:000 i:Z:O::::'(O WOO0 W~' LLO' 1'--'~("4("4 F- Z 030 . UO WOO0 rd') : ::: <]: 0 W ~ I:'..I ~ .0.~ O !:.~:./~: 0 0 O O h 'l- m:, rl Z · ". ,- -m ~' g!:: '' :: 5 g., o ._':..-, W rr'hO0 0..1t'~ Ll.(-.I 0.~,-~ 04 :: ~ 0 F.I J _J Oh: O~ 0'0: :,:>0'0 0000 0 r' 0 0 O' ZOO00 ..Ih _Jh ~P-OD 0 : 0 0 0:'000 I.L 0 : Z :::' :! r,'.:l' ILl >-: ' Wh 3 >' _1. z ~ ¢ o u :: ~ :! ~:: m ~ J -0 Z: ~: I: ..Cj.::' 113 t't ~ k~ ('4 ~ ~ "~ ~ ~:!;i::~:.::: o o ,0 o ::::::::::.::::~ b'J '.0 h. ~ ':: ' C'4 C'4 H 113 U3 ,: Ii1 b')' m :: to 0 t-9 P5 t,') . 0 0 0 '0 0 :: '0 ::: .:~:: I~ ,:r · I,,) t.') F"., ~ I,') ~ I~ ~ !~1~ 0 0 :! 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 -0 ,M !i 0 tl · -~ .O C~/ Cq IN N - ,.~ C,I -~ ~ C'4 -~ ,~ ; :.:!. l'- ' 1'9 .~,.rrj ~ -0 ,,0 ~ ,1~ 0 L. f...Q C 0 Z 0 ~OO I ~ O Z n. D fi .J LU UJ w Z OOUJ~ 4J I~ ,u <I: 4J rl-rZ:t-I--I-I-I-DOO>>~rrWLL~ 4J ,YI: 4J .u U ..P Jj-J W 0 ~ O -uuuu o m mm u~u~ ~,mFs - - ~r~ a:.:~ -~ www JJ_lJ U L1 U ,,"'.U D~DD X: ,Y /: <~ X: O~O00OO00J--IJWWOfi'~WJJW r- .r,o.,-.~. c-, F- u ,~ u nF.~nrYr,-r. crr~rOun.j.Jnnmr,'uUj OOC'O il-,D 0 O00OO000000,DOOOOC, O000: O0 C, O0 ': 0 000 OC'O0 LLIO ~0 : CL I:,OOC'O IL~ 1:2'.;,:: OO000000C. O000000000000 : . "::.i"O O O O .LL O J ~: O OO O O O O O O O ~ O O O C' O O O O O O ,Y '.:<: :;;;.: L1 · c;..:.:::. O IN r O O O ' " ,,',';'t ~: ';' "'1 : ~ :!.: ':::'., '. ' !~,;~:.I.~o.~o · o tr, O: ,-,0o00"oo0o~oooooooooo00 ~OO.';i::' rtOoO: JO · -~j;;'i:*OOOO .j'7.',; O O: OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO,OOOO.O:::; OO;~.:~i: OOO O OOO,.: m · L ::.T: :: := =" ~':.:= :' ' ~.: ' ' ~.:~:~: ~: : ' :' ~:-~:=:h ::: i7 ~ · ~ . :..~ . ~ , . ~ 0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 .0 .00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 .O -0 0 -O 0 0'.0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ·I- I: L :'; . :~.. : ::: u > - ~ ,~ ( · :,. J' - 'q ~ > : '7 ~ ~, ~ - ~: .... ~ g :. ~,., O ~ Z ~ · ~ ~..". ~.~; :Q~ ~ Q - .. '. ~ .... u ; ; -; , ; .:>,-;: > :; ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~ L o ' :'~ o C D -:" ~: :''"' ": ,, . . ' , : ; ~-. ,:~,~ . _.. o o .:::: , , ~,:~;:~, .; ;:: ..: ":Co::::;: ' :. ,~ ~ : ~ > ',:,' .:., e '=: ~ ~ S ~ ~Z %; Z :. ~ ~ ~::' ::= E: ::. :: :. ~.<: ,~: = ~: : o ~ :~ . :::'o o ~c ~ ~ ~:'::: : j~:~:~: ':~:~'~ · z " .;m2, z ~ ~ ....:~ , ~:::: ' ~:.: ~. ~ ~ . ":::I ~ i 'm: ~:~'¢ : ~ O ~ W O ' :t=:::' ~; :; ~ ,' : u ~ ~: z ~ '~:~::~: :~ o o ~ ~ - ::::::::::::::::::::::.~: · :~;: ~. :;,,>:Z:; , - .,. ,::::~::~:: ~: ~:'. · ":' : :O J :: J f~ ·.,: ~: : : ~ ~,- · U r ~ ' ~ ~=.:'::: ~ : :::::-- ;~ : O :.::: O~ ~:~:'- ::::~':7:::%: ¢: ,: .::.:: : ::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::' ~ I' T" D ;::: 2 ~ - ~?:.,~::A ~:.::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::· ; ~: .... ~ - ~ ~~::::.:~ ~: :~ ~ l:~<:~:~=; ~ ~::...~:::~.::::::::. · ::j ~ ::: :: ~ ::· ~ L':. 5:~::: '~":': .::: ,,: L ':~ ~ ~::~ ::::4 :::::::::::::::::::::: :;~::d~," :.:h:,::'::: :' ::::"' - ': i ':0 ' ~: ': :': ¢ .: · ': ,: ," : o, '~b:.,. ': .... ~: .::;:::~:: . ~ :~.'.~:.~. ':-::~': ::':' : o ~:.,, .::/::~:~::':: ~:% ::~: ~":' = '. f:,=:: - ' ' 'I ~' "' ~ f , CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: MTG: e/1,1/9o DEPT: MZB TITLE: ANIMAL COIrTROL AGRE~4.EN~ DEPT ATT~ CITY CITY MGR PREPi~ED BY: Joe Hreha, Manager of Information Systems RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENT: Authorize the City Manager to enter in to an agreement with the County of Riverside to provideAnimal Control Services in the City of Temecula for one year. On June 19, 1990, the City Council approved a proposal from the County of Riverside to provide Animal Control Services for one year, beginning July 1, 1990, for an amount not to exceed $80,000. Attached is the formal agreement for the City Council's approval and subsequent City Manager's authentication. Staff: - Reviewed the attached agreement Compared the agreement to the proposal approved by the Council at the June 19th meeting Concurs in the attached agreement Monies are available in the Fiscal Year 1991's budget for Animal Control Services in the amount of $80,000. Agreement for Services Relative to Regulation and Control of Dogs, Cats, and Other Domestic (~ An als 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES RELATIVE TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF DOGS, CATS, AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE through its Department of Health, herein called County, and the CITY OF TEMECULA, herein called City, pursuant to the provisions of Section 51301 of the Government Code. Recitals WHEREAS City is desirous that County provide certain services relative to the regulation and control of dogs and other domestic animals and County is desirous of providing such services, and WHEREAS County and Lake Elsinore Animal Friends, located at 29001 Bastton Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California, hereinafter referred to as "Shelter", entered into an agreement on May 1, 1990 whereby Shelter is obligated thereunder to perform certain services for County relating to dogs and other domestic animals delivered to Shelter by County; and all service provided under said agreement shall be pursuant to County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534, as amended, or such other County ordinances or resolutions which may hereafter replace or supersede said ordinances, and any applicable State law relating to such impoundment, care and disposal, and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 1. City Ordinances. City has adopted its Ordinance No. 90-04 prescribing procedures and standards for the licensing, impounding, regulation and control of dogs and other domestic animals substantially identical to those set forth in County Ordinance No. 630 as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534, as amended, and shall maintain the same in force so long as this Agreement shall remain in force. Two (2) certified copies of such ordinance, and of any ordinance amending or repealing the same, shall forthwith upon adoption be furnished to County; one of said copies to be furnished to the County Health Officer, and the other to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence July 1, 1990, and shall terminate June 30, 1991, except that either party to this Agreement may terminate its obligation hereunder upon 60 days written notice to the other. Further, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed on a year-to-year basis on the annual termination date thereof, subject to cancellation by either party upon 60 days written notice to the other. 3. Impound, Care, and Disposal of Do~s and Other Domestic Animals by Shelter. County shall cause Shelter to impound, care ORIGINAL - 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 for and dispose of all dogs and other domestic animals, owned, kept or harbored within, straying or running at large in or into the incorporated area of City, which are delivered by County to Shelter at Shelter's facilities located at 29001 Bastron Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California. In that connection, Shelter: (a) May humanely destroy any dog or other domestic animal and dispose of the remains at the request of the owner, upon payment by the owner of the fees for such destruction and disposal as set forth in Section 9(b) of County Ordinance No. 630 as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534 as amended. Shelter shall issue receipts for all such fees and charges collected and shall keep copies thereof. All destruction and disposal fees so collected shall be retained by Shelter. (b) Shall collect, from animal owners and others, for dogs and other domestic animals redeemed, the impound fees and charges as set forth in Section 9(a) of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and Section 12 of County Ordinance No. 534, as amended. Shelter shall issue receipts for all such fees and charges collected and shall keep copies thereof. All such fees and charges so collected shall be retained by Shelter. (c) Shall, prior to the release of any unredeemed impounded dog or cat to any adult individual, collect spay/neuter deposits in accordance with Section 10 of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and issue receipts therefore. All such fees and charges so collected shall be retained by Shelter. 4. Collection of Impound Fees and Char~es for Release of Unredeemed Impounded Do~s and Cats. COUNTY shall relinquish to Shelter any unredeemed impounded dog or cat for sale or disposal by Shelter in accordance with California Food and Agriculture Code Sections 30503 and 31751 requiring the collection of a spay/neuter deposit prior to the release of any dog or cat, and in accordance with Section 9(g) of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended. Shelter shall issue receipts for all such fees and charges collected and shall keep copies thereof. All such fees and charges so collected shall be retained by Shelter. 5. Services by County/Compensation. County shall perform services for City relating to the control of dogs and other domestic animals as prescribed by the provisions of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534, as amended, on the basis of 40 hours per week during the term of this IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIil ORIGINAL -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Agreement. City shall compensate County for such services at the following hourly rates plus mileage at $.42 per mile: Regular time - 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. weekdays with exception of holidays. Overtime - In excess of 8 hours per day or at any time on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. $32.00 $39.00 All services performed on an overtime basis must be authorized by the City Manager or his designated representative or any peace officer as that term is definedin Section 830 of the Penal Code. In addition, City shall compensate County at the following rates for every live dog or other domestic animal County delivers to Shelter as provided in Paragraph 3 herein: (a) $15.00 per live weaned animal delivered to Shelter. (b) Additional fees for animals housed in excess of ten (10) days; i.e., evidenciary animals: (1) Dogs/cats - $2.00 per day. (2) Birds/fowl - $1.00 per day. (3) Farm-type animals - $3.50 per day. (c) $25.00 per month to offset a portion of the rental expense paid by Shelter for euthanasia freezers. County shall submit a billing to City, on a monthly basis, for costs incurred during the immediately preceding month and said billing shall include the hours of such services provided, the nature of such services and the mileage incurred, and City shall pay County upon such billing and accounting. The maximum amount payable by City to County under this Agreement shall not exceed $80,000.00. Should the amount of $80,000.00 not be sufficient to cover the expenses of Fiscal Year 1990-91, City shall notify County at least sixty ~60) days in advance. Upon such notification by City, County shall discontinue services unless City provides written assurance that funds are available to defray further expenses incurred by County. 6. Licenses for Do~s, Kennels and Catteries. County shall issue dog licenses, licenses to operate dog kennels and carteties within City, and collect fees in connection therewith for dogs within City. County shall provide its own forms and tags for such licenses. All fees for licenses to operate dog kennels and catteries shall be retained by County. All fees collected for dog licenses shall be accounted for by County and remitted to City on a monthly basis; provided, however, that County shall retain the sum of $5.85 for each dog license issued hereunder. 7. County/City Personnel. The services provided by County shall be performed by County personnel under the control and ORIGINAL DOH-MM.0244Rev 12f811 -3- O~G~NAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 direction of County. City shall have the right to inspect County's records pertaining to the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. To the extent that City officers or employees may voluntarily participate in any of the activities herein provided for, or that peace officers of City shall be called upon to render aid or assistance within the boundaries of City or otherwise to perform law enforcement functions, the expenses thereof shall be borne by City. 8. Veterinarian Fees. Notwithstanding any provisions herein contained, City shall be responsible for the payment of veterinarian fees incurred as a result of the enforcement of California Penal Code Section 597f. 9. Animal Care Education and Information ProRram. County will provide lectures and presentations relative to animal care education and information to schools and community groups upon reasonable prior notice from City, and scheduling availability of County Animal Control personnel. Pamphlets and/or flyers relative to animal care and animal education will be provided by County at no additional cost to City. 10. SDay/Neuter and Rabies Vaccination ProRram. County will maintain a mandated low-cost spay/neuter program through the services of various licensed veterinarians or in a County-operated low cost spay and neuter clinic. Door-to-door canvassing to verify rabies vaccination and applicable licensing will be performed in conjunction with other field services provided by County Animal Control personnel. Annual low-cost rabies vaccination clinics will be held in City by County. City of Temecula dog licenses will be sold at these clinics. 11. Hold Harmless. City shall indemnify and hold County, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any claim or liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of City, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, for property damage, bodily injury or death or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, occurring in the performance of this Agreement between the parties hereto to the extent that such liability is imposed on the County by the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California, and City shall defend at its expense, including attorney fees, County, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any legal action or claim of any kind based upon such alleged acts or omissions. County shall indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any claim or liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of County, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 36 and independent contractors, for property damage, bodily injury or death or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, occurring in the performance of this Agreement between the parties hereto to the extent that such liability is imposed on the City by the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California, and County shall defend at its expense, including attorney fees, City, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any legal action or claim of any kind based upon such alleged acts or omissions. 12. Venue. Any action at law or in equity brought by either of the parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by the Agreement shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of California, and the parties hereby waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceedings to any other county. 13. Attorneys' Fee. In the event of any litigation or arbitration between CONTRACTOR and COUNTY to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or any right of either party hereto, the unsuccessful party to such litigation or arbitration agrees to pay reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred therein by the successful party; all of which shall be included in and as a part of the judgment rendered in such litigation or arbitration. 14. Paragraph Headings. The paragraph headings herein are for the convenience of the parties only, and shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement. 15. County's Representative. COUNTY hereby appoints the Director of Health for the County of Riverside, or his designee, as its authorized representative to administer this Agreement. 16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the provisions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. This Agreement may be IIIII !1111 IIIII IIIII IIIII Iliil II!11 IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII ORIGINAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 changed or modified only upon the written consent of the parties hereto. Dated: ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By Chairman, Board of Supervisors By Deputy (SEAL) CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) Title ,, ilGINAL -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES RELATIVE TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF DOGS, CATS, AND OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE through its Department of Health, herein called County, and the CITY OF TEMECULA, herein called City, pursuant to the provisions of Section 51301 of the Government Code. Recitals WHEREAS City is desirous that County provide certain services relative to the regulation and control of dogs and other domestic animals and County is desirous of providing such services, and WHEREAS County and Lake Elsinore Animal Friends, located at 29001 Bastton Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California, hereinafter referred to as "Shelter", entered into an agreement on May 1, 1990 whereby Shelter is obligated thereunder to perform certain services for County relating to dogs and other domestic animals delivered to Shelter by County; and all service provided under said agreement shall be pursuant to County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534, as amended, or such other County ordinances or resolutions which may hereafter replace or supersede said ordinances, and any applicable State law relating to such impoundment, care and disposal, and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 1. City Ordinances. City has adopted its Ordinance No. 90-04 prescribing procedures and standards for the licensing, impounding, regulation and control of dogs and other domestic animals substantially identical to those set forth in County Ordinance No. 630 as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534, as amended, and shall maintain the same in force so long as this Agreement shall remain in force. Two (2) certified copies of such ordinance, and of any ordinance amending or repealing the same, shall forthwith upon adoption be furnished to County; one of said copies to be furnished to the County Health Officer, and the other to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence July 1, 1990, and shall terminate June 30, 1991, except that either party to this Agreement may terminate its obligation hereunder upon 60 days written notice to the other. Further, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed on a year-to-year b~sis on the annual termination date thereof, subject to cancellation by either party upon 60 days written notice to the other. 3. Impound, Care, and Disposal of Dogs and Other Domestic Animals by Shelter. County shall cause Shelter t~ impound, care -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 for and dispose of all dogs and other domestic animals, owned, kept or harbored within, straying or running at large in or into the incorporated area of City, which are delivered by County to Shelter at Shelter's facilities located at 29001 Bastton Avenue, Lake Elsinore, California. In that connection, Shelter: (a) May humanely destroy any dog or other domestic animal and dispose of the remains at the request of the owner, upon payment by the owner of the fees for such destruction and disposal as set forth in Section 9(b) of County Ordinance No. 630 as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534 as amended. Shelter shall issue receipts for all such fees and charges collected and shall keep copies thereof. All destruction and disposal fees so collected shall be retained by Shelter. (b) Shall collect, from animal owners and others, for dogs and other domestic animals redeemed, the impound fees and charges as set forth in Section 9(a) of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and Section 12 of County Ordinance No. 534, as amended. Shelter shall issue receipts for all such fees and charges collected and shall keep copies thereof. All such fees and charges so collected shall be retained by Shelter. (c) Shall, prior to the release of any unredeemed impounded dog or cat to any adult individual, collect spay/neuter deposits in accordance with Section 10 of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and issue receipts therefore. All such fees and charges so collected shall be retained by Shelter. 4. Collection of Impound Fees and Charges for Release of Unredeemed Impounded Dogs and Cats. COUNTY shall relinquish to Shelter any unredeemed impounded dog or cat for sale or disposal by Shelter in accordance with California Food and Agriculture Code Sections 30503 and 31751 requiring the collection of a spay/neuter deposit prior to the release of any dog or cat, and in accordance with Section 9(g) of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended. Shelter shall issue receipts for all such fees and charges collected and shall keep copies thereof. All such fees and charges so collected shall be retained by Shelter. 5. Services by County/Compensation. County shall perform services for City relating to the control of dogs and other domestic animals as prescribed by the provisions of County Ordinance No. 630, as amended, and County Ordinance No. 534, as amended, on the basis of 40 hours per week during the term of this IIIII Ilill Ii111 I1111 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Agreement. City shall compensate County for such services at the following hourly rates plus mileage at $.42 per mile: Regular time - 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. weekdays with exception of holidays. Overtime - In excess of 8 hours per day or at any time on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. $32.00 $39.00 All services performed on an overtime basis must be authorized by the City 'Manager or his designated representative or any peace officer as that term is defined'in Section 830 of the Penal Code. In addition, City shall compensate County at the following rates for every live dog or other domestic animal County delivers to Shelter as provided in Paragraph 3 herein: (a) $15.00 per live weaned animal delivered to Shelter. (b) Additional fees for animals housed in excess of ten (10) days; i.e., evidenciary animals: (1) Dogs/cats - $2.00 per day. (2) Birds/fowl - $1.00 per day. (3) Farm-type animals - $3.50 per day. (c) $25.00 per month to offset a portion of the rental expense paid by Shelter for euthanasia freezers. County shall submit a billing to City, on a monthly basis, for costs incurred during the immediately preceding month and said billing shall include the hours of such services provided, the nature of such services and the mileage incurred, and City shall pay County upon such billing and accounting. The maximum amount payable by City to County under this Agreement shall not exceed $80,000.00. Should the amount of $80,000.00 not be sufficient to cover the expenses of Fiscal Year 1990-91, City shall notify County at least sixty (60) days in advance. Upon such notification by City, County shall discontinue services unless City provides written assurance that funds are available to defray further expenses incurred by County. 6. Licenses for Do~s, Kennels and Catteries. County shall issue dog licenses, licenses to operate dog kennels and carteties within City, and collect fees in connection therewith for dogs within City. County shall provide its own forms and tags for such licenses. All fees for licenses to operate dog kennels and catteries shall be retained by County. All fees collected for dog licenses shall be accounted for by County an~ remitted to City on a monthly basis; provided, however, that County shall retain the sum of $5.85 for each dog license issued hereunder. 7. County/City Personnel. The services pr9vided by County shall be performed by County personnel under the control and -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 direction of County. City shall have the right to inspect County's records pertaining to the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. To the extent that City officers or employees may voluntarily participate in any of the activities herein provided for, or that peace officers of City shall be called upon to render aid or assistance within the boundaries of City or otherwise to perform law enforcement functions, the expenses thereof shall be borne by City. 8. Veterinarian Fees. Notwithstanding any provisions herein contained~ City shall be responsible for the payment of veterinarian fees incurred as a result of the enforcement of California Penal Code Section 597f. 10 11 12 13 9. Animal Care Education and Information Program. County will provide lectures and presentations relative to animal care education and information to schools and community groups upon reasonable prior notice from City, and scheduling availability of County Animal Control personnel. 14 15 Pamphlets and/or flyers relative to animal care and animal education will be provided by County at no additional cost to City. 16 17 18 10. Spay/Neuter and Rabies Vaccination Program. County will maintain a mandated low-cost spay/neuter program through the services of various licensed veterinarians or in a County-operated low cost spay and neuter clinic. 19 20 21 Door-to-door canvassing to verify rabies vaccination and applicable licensing will be performed in conjunction with other field services provided by County Animal Control personnel. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Annual low-cost rabies vaccination clinics will be held in City by County. City of Temecula dog licenses will be sold at these clinics. 11. Hol~ Harmless. City shall indemnify and hold County, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any claim or liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of City, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, for property damage, bodily injury or death or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, occurring in the performance of this Agreement between the parties hereto to the extent that such liability is imposed on the County by the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California, and City shall defend at its expense, including attorney fees, County, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any legal action or claim of any kind based upon such alleged acts or omissions. 34 35 36 County shall indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any claim or liability whatsoever, based or asserted. upon any act or omission of County, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ' 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 and independent contractors, for property damage, bodily injury or death or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, occurring in the performance of this Agreement between the parties hereto to the extent that such liability is imposed on the City by the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California, and County shall defend at its expense, including attorney fees, City, its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any legal action or claim of any kind based upon such alleged acts or omissions. 12. Venus. Any action at law or in equity brought by either of the parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by the Agreement shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of California, and the parties hereby waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venus in such proceedings to any other county. 13. Attorneys' Fee. In the event of any litigation or arbitration between CONTRACTOR and COUNTY to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or any right of either party hereto, the unsuccessful party to such litigation or arbitration agrees to pay reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred therein by the successful party; all of which shall be included in and as a part of the judgment rendered in such litigation or arbitration. 14. Paragraph Headings. The paragraph headings herein are for the convenience of the parties only, and shall not be deemed to 'govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement. 15. County's Representative. COUNTY hereby appoints the Director of Health for the County of Riverside, or his designee, as its authorized representative to administer this Agreement. 16. Entire A~reement. This Agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the provisions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. This Agreement may be It111 Iliil IIII! Ilill IIIII III!1 I1111 Ilill i1111 I!111 !1111 i1111 , Iiill -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 changed or modified only upon the written consent of the parties hereto. Dated: ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By Chairman, Board of Supervisors By Deputy (SEAL) CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: By City Clerk ( SEAL ) Title -6- T-x- ,--.15 CrrYOFTEMECYJ_~ AGENDA 1/s3aORT air THREE-YEAR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO COVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS RECOlVlM~NDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a cooperative agreement between the city of Temecula and the Economic Development Agency of Riverside, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreements. BACKGROUND The city of Temecula is one of several cities in Riveside county which cooperates with the county in carrying out the intent and the funding of the Community Development Block Grant programs. The city of Temecula is not an entitlement city; and, therefore, needs to enter into a cooperative agreement so that annual funds can be appropriated to the city of Temecula for local programs which fall within the block grant program criteria. The cooperative agreement (attached) needs to be executed and forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors for execution. It will then be forwarded to the Los Angeles office of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1 2 4 5 COOPERATION AGREEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTBLOCKGRANT FUNDS IMPLEMENTING THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSING AND URBAN RURAL RECOVERY ACT OF 1983 6 V 8 9 i0 11 12 13 14 .... 15 16 27 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as 'COUNTY', and CITY OF TEMECULA · an incorporated municipality within the geographical boundaries of the COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as 'CITY', mutually agree as 1. GENERAL. The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended by the Housing and Urban Rural Recovery Act of 1983, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act', provides that grant funds may be used for the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and by expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low 17 and moderate income. 18 COUNTY is ~ualified as an 'Urban County' under the Act. 19 CITY, by executing this Agreement, hereby gives notice of its 20 election to participate in an Urban County Community Development 21 Block Grant program, hereinafter referred to as 'CDBG programs'. 22 Furthermore, COUNTY is hereby authorized to carry out activities 23 which will be funded by Community Development block Grants from 24 federal fiscal years 1991, 1992 and 1993 appropriations and from 25 any program income generated by the expenditure of such funds. 26 COUNTY and CITY hereby agree to cooperate or to assist in undertaking community renewal and lower income housing assistance /// follows: 1 activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted 2 housing. 3 2. TERN. 4 The term of this Agreement shall be for not less than a 5 period of three (3) years commencing on the date specified below 6 and extending through the federal fiscal years FY 91-92, FY 92-93 7 and FY 93-94. 8 3. PREPARATION OF FEDERALLY REOUIRED FUNDING g APPLICATIONS. 10 COUNTY, by and through its Economic Development Agency, 11 subject to approval of COUNTY°s Board of Supervisors, shall be 12 responsible for preparing and submitting to the Department of 13 Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter referred to as 14 in a timely manner those reports and statements required by the 15 Act and the federal regulations promulgated by HUD to secure 16 entitlement grant funding under the CDBG program. 17 4. COMPLIANCE WITHFF-DERAL ~TATUTES, REGULATIONS AND_ 18 ~APPT. ICABLE STATUTES, ~GUT.&TIONSANDORDINANCES. 19 (a) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable 20 provisions of the Act and those federal regulations promulgated by 21 ~ pursuant thereto, as the same currently exists or may 22 hereafter by amended. (104(b) of Title I; Title 42 United States 23 Code SS5301, et seq., and Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations 24 Part 570.) In addition, COUNTY and CITY will comply with Title VI 25 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. SS3601, et seq.); 26 section 109 Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act 27 of 1974 (42 U.S.C. S5309); Executive Order 11063, as amended by 28 Executive Order 12259; Section 109 of the Act of the National I..U~C. KA~ COUNTY CCY,.JNSF~ SUITE300 ]535 - 10TH STREET ~ CALr-ORN~A 2 Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. SS4321, et seq.)~ the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. SS4630, et seq.) and any other federal or state statute or regulation that is applicable to use of entitlement grant funds. (b) COUNTY and CITY shall: 1. Meet the citizen participation requirements of 570.301(a)(2) and provide citizens with: A. the estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used for activities that will benefit persons of low and moderate income~ and B. aplan for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of activities assisted with CDBG funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a result of such activities. (c) CITY shall follow a detailed citizen participation plan which: 1. provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation.. by persons of low and moderate income who are residents of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods~ 2. provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act; 3 26 27 28 representative of persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance in developing proposals, with the level and type of assistance to be determined: by the grantee; 4. provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at a11~ stages of the connnunity development program, including- at least the development of needs, the review of~ proposed activities and review of program performance,; which hearings shall be held after adequate notice, at! times an locations convenient to potential or actual~ beneficiaries, and with acconnnondation for the~ handicapped~ 5. provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and grievances, Within 15 working; days where practicable~ and 6. identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will be met in the case-..of public hearings where a significant number of non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate. (d) CITY shall develop a community development plan, for the period of this Agreement, that identifies' community development and housing needs and specifies both short and long-term co,~uunity development objectives that have been with the primary objective and developed in accordance requirements of the Act. (e) cz z is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written agreement set forth in 24 CFR 570.303. -4- 19 26 27 (f) CITY certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the CITY, to any[ person for influencing or attempting to influence an~ officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Z Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or ant employee of a Member of Congress in connection with thei awarding of any Federal contract, the making of anyi Federal grant, the' making of any Federal loan, thei entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the~ extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or! modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan,.. orZ cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Fe~erB1 appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person forZ influencing or attempting to influence an officer or' employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress "in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit .standard Form-LLL, *Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,* in accordance with its instructions. 3. -The CITY shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, ~nd contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. -5- 14 federal regulations or for the efficient administration of the 15 CDBGprogramwill be adopted by COUNTY*s Board of Supervisors'and 16 COUNTY andCITYwill adhere to said policyand program 17 objectives. Prior to adoption of said Polic7 and program 18 objectives or adoption of amendments thereto, CITY will be 19 notified of the policy or program objectives and be permitted-to 20 review and comment thereon before any final action is taken by 21 COUNTY°s Board of Supervisors. 6. ~]PPT.~TAL AGRE~4ENT. For each Fiscal year during the term of this Agreement, 24 COUNTY 'and CITY shall enter into' a Supplemental Agreement that 25 will have a term coinciding with a Program Year and enumerate the 26 project(s) CITY will implement with its entitlement funds. Said 27 Supplemental Agreement will set forth the time schedule for 28 completion of said project(s) and any funding sources, in addition 1 This certification is a material representation 2 of fact upon which reliance was placed when this 3 transaction was made or entered into. 4 (g) CERTIFICATION REGARDING POLICY PROHIBITING USE 5 OF EXCESSIVE FORCE. 6 In accordance with Section 519 Public Law 101-144, 7 (the 1990 HUDAppropriations Act), the CITY certifies 8 that: It has adopted and is enforcing a policy 9 prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement '10 agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals 11 engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations. 1~ 5. COMPT.IANc~.WITHPOr. ICvANDPROGRAMOBJ~.CTIVES. 13 Policy and program objectives as required by applicable 6 7 8 9 '10 1 to entitlement funds, that will be used in completing the 2 project(s). If substantial compliance with the completion 3 schedule, due to unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances, 4 cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the project(s) may be 5 extended. If substantial progress toward completion of a project(s) is not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, the entitlement funds associated with the project(s) may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate notice if given COUNTY's decision not to extend the completion schedule 11 associated with the project(s) or to reprogram the entitlement 12 funds associated with the project(s) will not excuse CITY from 13 complying with terms of this Agreement nor will said decision 14 render CITY ineligible ~rom securing entitlement ~unds in ~uture 15 fiscal years governed bythisAgreement. 16 7. nrrERNINAT~ON OF PROO~-CT~ TO B~ FUNDED AND 17 nTRTRTBUTTON OF ENTTTT.I~'!~NT FUNDS. 18 CITY will,. prior to the commencement of a Program Year, 19 designate those projects that it desires to implement with its 20' entitlement funds said designation to comply with statutory and 21 regulatoryprovisions governing citizen's participation. Said 22 designation is to be reviewed by the COUNTY's Economic Development 23 Agency to determine that the project is eligible under federal 24 regulations for funding and consistent with both federal and 25 COUNT~E policy governing use of Community Development Block Grant 26 (CDBG) funds. 27 COUNTY's Board of Supervisors will, consistent with Paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 o£ this Agreement determine the COUNSEl, SUfT'E3O0 !OTH ~ JERS~D~CALFORNIA 7 1 4 5 6 8 9 '10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 hereof. 27/// /// distribution and disposition of all CDBG funds received by COUNTY pursuant to the Act. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MANUAL. CITY warrants that those officers, employees and agents retained by it and responsible for implementing those projects funded by CDBG funds have received, reviewed and will follow the Community Development Block Grant Manual that has been prepared by COUNTY and, by this reference, said Manual is incorporated herein and made a part hereof. 9. RF~T. PROPERTVACOUTRED OR PUBLIC FACIT.ITYCONSTRUCTED WITH CDBG FUNDS. When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part, by CITY to acquire real property or to construct a public facility, CITY will comply with the National Environmental PolicyAct of 1969 (42 U.S.C. SS4321, et seq.), the California Environmental 0uality Act (Ca1. Pub. Resources Code SS21000, et seq.), the Uniform RelocationAssistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies--act Of 1970 (42 U.S.C. SS4630, et seq.), California Government Code Sections 7260 et seq., as those Acts may be amended from time to time and any federal or state regulations issued to implement the aforementioned laws, and the Housing Policy for the Community Development Block Grant Program adopted by COUNTY and attached hereto marked as Exhibit 'A*, and by this reference made a part In addition, the following is to occur: (1) Title to the real property shall vest in CITY; 8 1 (2) the real property will be held by or the constructed facility wfll be maintained by the CITY for a minimum period of 20 years; (3) while held by CITY, the real property or the constructed facility is to be used exclusively for the purpose for which acquisition or construction was originally approved by COUNTY; (4) CITY shall provide timely notice to COUNTY of any action which would result in a modification or change in the use of the real property purchased or improved, in whole or in part, withCDBG funds from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement, including disposition. (5) Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if the property or the facility is to be put to an alternate' use that is or {- not consistent with federal regulations governing CDBG funds; (6) should CITY desire during the 20-year period to use the real property or the constructed facility for a purpose not consistent with applicable federal regulations governing CDBG funds or to sell the real property or facility, then: (a) If CITY desires to retain title, it will have to reimburse either COUNTY or the federal government an amount that represents the percentage of current fair market value that is identical to the percentage of current fair market value that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised monies paid to ~nitially acquire the property or construct the facility; or (b) if CITY sells the property or facility or is required to sell the property or facility, CITY is to reimburse either the COUNTY or the federal government an amount that represents the percentage or proceeds realized by the sale that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised monies paid to initially acquire the property or construct the facility. This percentage amount will be calculated after deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale from the sale proceeds. 10. DISPOSITION OF TNCOMEGRNEP, ATED BY THE EXPENDITURE OF CDBG FUNDS. CITY shall informCOUNTY of any income generated by'the expenditure of COBG funds received b~CITY from COUNTY'S .... CITY may retain any program income so generated. Any and all program income may only be used for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements, including all requirement's for citizen participation. COUNTY has the responsibility for monitoring and reporting to HUDon the use of any such program income, thereby requiring appropriate recordkeeping and reporting by CITY as may be needed and requested by COUNTY. In the event of a change in status of CITY or the close-out of funds governed by of this Cooperation Agreement, any and all program income that is currently on hand or received /// lo 7 8 9 11 14 ..... 1 2 COUNTY. 4 27 subsequent to the change in status of close-out shall be paid to 11. TERMINATION. This Agreement may not be terminated by either CITY or 5 COUNTY, nor may the CITY or COUNTYwithdraw from this Agreement or any of the terms of this Agreement. 12. FORMER AGREEMENTS UTILIZING COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY. All agreements between CITY and COUNTY'S regarding the use of CDBG funds for fiscal years 1975-76 through 1990-91 and any supplemental agreements thereunder, shall remain in full force and effect. If the language of this Agreement is in conflict or inconsistent with the terms of any prior said agreements between CITY and COUNTY, the language of this Agreement will be controlling. 13. LIABILITY. 17 COUNTY shall assume no liability for the negligence of 18 CITY or of any officer, employee or agent thereof, and CITY shall 19 hold COUNTY free and harmless from any loss, damage or liability 20 that may arise out of the performance of this Agreement. 21 CITY shall indemnify COUNTY'S in the amount of any CITY 22 expenditure under this Agreement which is determined by HUD to be 23 improper, if such amount is charged against the COUNTY or withheld 24 -from COUNTY'S share of funds under the Act. 25 CITY shall assume no liability for the negligence of 26 COUNTY or of any officer, employee or agent thereof, and COUNTY'S shall hold CITY free and harmless for any loss, damage or liability that may arise out of the performance of this Agreement. 11 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 '10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 24 26 28 JAM C- MATagNSTEIN COUNTY shall indemnify CITY in the amount of anyCOUNTY'.S expenditure under this Agreement' which is determined by HUD to be improper, if such amount is charged against the CITY or withheld from CITY's share of funds under the Act. Da ted: ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board , 19 . COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ATTEST: Deputy By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors CITY OF TEMECULA By: By: COUNTY COUNS~. CERTTFTCATION The Office of the County Counsel hereby certifies that the terms and provisions of this Agreement are fully authorized ~nder State and local law and that the Agreement provides full' legal authority for the COUNTY to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing. LAV:ay 6/26/90 130A WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel By: Deputy 12 EXHIBIT HOUSING POLICY FOR COHI4UNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, encourages and supports the development of decent, safe, and sanitary housing vtthtn a suttable living environment that is affordable to low and moderate tncome persons. The County is required under the Act to develop and Implement an approved Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) as part of its Community Development Block Grant Application (Title 24) Code of Federal Regulations (Part 570.306), The Housing Assistance Plan serves as a measure of the conditions of the houstng stock and the needs of low and moderate income persons for housing assistance. The HAP also serves to establish goals for assistance best suited to meet the identified needs and to further the revltallzatton of the community. The HAP must also provide general locations for assisted housing, which promotes a greater choice of housing opportunities and avotds undue .concentrations of assisted persons in areas containing a high proportion of lower tncome persons, and whtch furthers fatr housing and assures the availability of publtc facilities. Zn addition, all communities are expected to share in protiding expanded housing opportunities for lower income persons and to participate in area-vide solutions of housing problems through promotion of spatial deconcentratton of housing opportunities for lower income persons. , The County and its cooperating cities have revteved and formlly approved their respective Housing Assistance Plans. As such, the local :Jurisdictions are responsible for Implementation of the Housing Assistance Plan in an expeditious manner, This tncludes the ttmely achievement of all goals for assisted housing and particularly those vhtch address the needs of faintlies and large famtltes requiring rental assistance. Local :Jurisdictions may be expected to take any or all actions vtthtn their control to facilitate. the Implementation of an approved Housing Assistance Plan, Including: * acquisition of sites and provision of stte Improvements for the development of assisted houstng; * adoption or modification of local ordinances and land use measures to facilitate the development of assisted housing, Including insti- tution of local referendum actions, where necessary; * issuance of appropriate zoning changes, building permits, utility connections and stmtlar administrative requirements; * formation of a local housing authority or execution of an agreement ~ith a housing authority having powers to provide assisted housing vtthtn the local :Jurisdiction; * removal of local restdency preferences for assisted housing; * promotional and assistance activities to encourage developers to initiate assisted housing or to allocate a portion of their planned unsubsidized developments for assisted housing, and to encourage own- ers to make units available for Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program; Exhibit "~" Housing Policy for CDBG County of Riverside Page Tvo * measures to reduce the cost of housing development, such as tax abatement, deferral, vatvet or deferral of fees and other admin- istrative costs. The County of Riverside requires all ctttes and sponsors to contribute to the Implementation of the Houstng Assistance Plan. Section Z of the Sponsor's Agreement states that Community Development Block Grant funds are to be used to asstat and undertake essential Community Development and Housing Assistance activities pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. Failure to comply vtth these provisions, specifically any action on the part of a cooperating city or sponsor taken to impede the development of publtcly-~sststed housing, my result in that City or sponsor not qualifying to receive Community Development Block Grant Funding. State lay also requires local government action to produce housing. C~ltfornta Government Code, Sectton 65302 (c) requires that all Jurisdictions in-the State of California prepare a housing element vhtch identifies existing and future housing needs, and develops plans for meeting such needs. Sectton 65008 of the C~ltfornta Government Code, as amended, prohibits, triter alta, any city or county from enacting or administering ordinances pursuant to Tttle 7 (Planning and L~nd Use, Government Code 65000 et. proh b t or discriminate against any .residential development seq.) vhtch t t or pro~ect because of the method Of financing or the race, sex, color, reltgtou, nattonal ortgtn, ancestry, lavful occupation, or age of-~the ovners or intended occupants of the residential development. The Code further provtdes that "the Legislature finds and declares that discriminatory practices lhtch inhibit the development of housing for persons and ramtiles of 1or, moderate, and mtddle income, or emergency shelters for the homeless, are a mtter of statevide concern". Dtscrtmlnatton against housing for 1or, moderate and middle income persons, and especially families, is also a matter of local concern. Therefore, tt is the policy of the County of Riverside that Community Development Block Grant funds shall be idthheld from any sponsor or potential sponsor vhtch discriminates against, or inhibits the development of housing for 1or and moderate income persons or famtltes vtthtn tts Jurisdiction. Furthermore, each sponsoring entity shall take actions vtthtn tts capabilities to the support of publicly-assisted houstng. Zn addition to city and community support, spectal districts, Including school districts, are expected to assist, contribute or set aside sufficient capacityvhere legally possible, to accommodate the development of 1or, moderate, and middle income housing vithin their jurisdictions. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: 8/14/90 TITLE: NTG: DEpT:MIS PREPAREDBY: DEPT HD ., ~ CABLE TELEVISION CiTY ATT~_~ Joe Hreha, Manager Of Information CS~:t:mGR, ~ RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution establishing non-refundable fees for cable television franchise applications and agreements. Adopt a Resolution appropriating $15,000 for cable television consulting services. BACKGROUND: The City Council recently adopted an Ordinance establishing procedures and standards for granting cable television franchises. Section 1.12 of that Ordinance provides that persons may apply for a cable television franchise by submitting certain information to the City and paying a non-refundable processing fee. This fee is intended to cover certain fixed costs the City must spend to process any franchise application. Any additional costs the City incurs beyond the non-refundable fee will also be recovered as a condition for issuance of the franchise. The City has already received a franchise application from Jones Intercable. The Staff has also obtained a proposal from Telecommunications Management Corporation (TMC) to provide cable television consulting services for the City in connection with processing franchise applications and agreements. This consulting firm is the same organization that drafted our cable television Ordinance. TMC's proposal establishes certain fixed price costs for reviewing the franchise applications and negotiating franchise agreements. Specifically, the cost to evaluate the financial and technical qualifications of a franchise applicant, as well as evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of granting additional franchises is $2,800. Assuming the applicant meets these initial prerequisites, the cost of negotiating an actual franchise is $4,200. Accordingly, TMC's charges are recommended as the amounts to be set for the non-refundable franchise application and agreement fees. Also attached is a resolution appropriating $15,000 for cable television consulting services. FISCAL IMPACT: None. All monies expended to process applications and negotiate agreements are reimbursed by the applicant. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolutions. RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING APPLICATIONS FOR CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISES WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 90-12 of the City of Temecula provides procedures for awarding new cable television franchises; WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 90-12 provides that the City may set a reasonable non- refundable fee for processing applications for cable television franchises; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The non-refundable fees to apply for a cable television franchise are as follows: A. B. Evaluation of a Franchise Application Negotiations for a new Franchise $2,800.00 $4,200.00 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 14th day of August, 1990. ATTEST: Ronald i. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] 4~RESOS~92 08108/~0 RESOLLrrlON NO. 90- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $1~,000 FOR CABLE TELEVISION CONSULTING SERVICES WHEREAS, the FYg0-91 Budget requires the appropriation of monies in order to process cable television applications and agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETER.MINED AND ORDERRD BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. $15,000 is hereby appropriated to cable television consulting services for processing applications and franchise agreements. SECTION 2. City Manager is hereby authorized to recruit and hire necessary personnel to carry out this project. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 14th day of August, 1990. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor A'ITEST: June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] 4'~\93 08/08/90 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT NIl: tfrG: DEPT: 8/lq/90 PLNG TITLE: FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23211 Prepared by: Recommendation: Samuel Reed, Senior Planner Set for Public Hearing August 28, 1990. CiTY T CiTY HGR ~ on APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: R EPR ESENTAT I VE: P R OPOSA L: LOCAT I ON: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: PROJECT STATISTICS: Marstan Development Gary Martin 128 unit condominium subdivision of 7.23 acres. First Extension of Time. South side of Margarita Road, between Moraga Road and Avenida Cima Del Sol. R-3-2500 (General Residential, one unit per 2,500 square feet) North: South: East: West: R-1 ( Single Family Residential ) R-3 ( General Residential ) R-3-3000 {General Residential, one unit per 3,000 sq.ft. ) R-3-3000 (General Residential, one unit per 3,000 sq.ft. ) Large lot with single family residence No. of Units: No. of Acres: Proposed Density: SWAP Density: 128 7.23 17.5 units per acre 8-16 units per acre STAFFRPT\VTT23211 BACKGROUND: PURPOSE FOR HEARING: This project was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on May 31, 1988. At that time a Negative Declaration was adopted and the project was found to be consistent with applicable policies in the Comprehensive General Plan and Zoning requirements. An application for a First Extension of Time for this vesting tentative map was filed with the City of Temecula on April 20, 1990. Location This project is located on the south side of Margarita Road, east of Moraga Road. It is located immediately north of Tract No. 23304, the Club Valencia condominium project. It is located east of an approved but not yet constructed 220 unit apartment project on Margarita Road. Status The Extension of Time application was filed subsequent to a new application being filed on the project site, Tentative Tract No. 25443, which proposes to subdivide the same 7.23 acres into 105 condominium units. The density on the new project as proposed is 14.5 units per acre. Staff perceives three essential issues as the reason for the Council to consider this matter fully: 1. 2. e Proposed density { 17.5 units per acre) Clustering of multi-family projects in this area 120 properties zoned for multi-family and in varying stages of development in this area between Rancho California Road and Margarita Road) Grading and the loss of a natural ridgeline to accommodate multi-family density. A less dense project is currently proposed for site (14.5 units per acre) STAFF RECOMMENDAT ION: GT:ks That the City Council SET THE EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23211 FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 28, 1990. 2 ~:.~ 0 ~ Z~C) Z 0 0 0 ~'~m~__ MAX. II,.DG. HT. B3f "' 'I' TYPtCAL BIDCa, 300 ,,/ ,,, TYINCAL BLDG. 200 / · TYF'tC:At. BLDG. 100 /' ~ , -- L O ' L ' ' R ' ", , MBR 8R , L I| ~~8A~ :'* :;' ~;' ' :t.'9'"' ~,' -~": · -.-' ~L,~ _~' ':'- ~ ~' K I VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 232 ! I - 6ULC)IIG PLANS 128 CONDOMINIUMS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA ART MONTGOMERY PROJECT/ON 128 Unit ADt./Condo Site So. Ft. __~ MIX Rent/s~. ft. Rent Rent/roD. Rent/yr. 750 28 lbr/lba .~,~,. 495 13,860 166,320 875 36 ~br/lba 2~ '~ 568 20,448 245,376 950 36 ~h~/2ba 618 22,248 266,976 1050 28 3br/2ba ~ '0b% 683 19,124 229,488 Lndy 20 2,560 30,720 939,880 Value $939,880 X 8 (gross rent) = $7,511,040 (58,680/unit) Cost Total Fees 512,000 ON/Off Site 519,000 Hard Cost 3,543,000 T~nd 1,280,000 Interest 562,500 Points 84,375 6,500,874 S/unit 4,000 (end. estimate before fee increase) 4,054 (eng. estimate w no contingenies) 27,680 (30/sq. ft. X 118,100 sq. ft.) 10,000 4,095 (5.625M at 10% for 1 yr.) 659 (1½ pts. for above const. loan) 50,488 ) ne . ! jan zatnn october 15, 1987 ~UBJECTx Preliminary Rental Recommendations Fomily Townhouse Apartments Alia Murrieta, Rancho. California 3ased upon a' review of tile unit plans as currently designed and ~'~ easing characteristics of tile existing Rancho California .ental inventory, we recommend pricing il~ a range from $62B to ~B~ per month as shown im~ Exhibit 1. The~e' ~enhs assume that unit emenities include washer and dryer, refrigerator, central ~ir conditiol~il~, full carpets and window coverings. The value of al~ enclosed ~urage is already factored into the rents, and the assumption is that an, attached garage carries a premium per month over a detached ~ara~e. We have yet to evaluate tile rents in single family homes and townhOmes ill time. area. This phase of the analysis should be completed in tile next week. We will notify you if tile analysis allows us tu .i~crease rents above tile base presen.t.ed. 'in this preliminary report. I'he preliminary re,its will place the Alta Hurrieta apartments at the top of tile rental market in llam~cho California based upon existing illventory. llowever, no other apartment project offers a product comparable to the towlHlouse concept being planned. Further, projects currently in planuillg conform to tile existing ,inventory ill Unit types and sizes and will not produce any comparable uuits. TIle apartment market in l~a,lcho California continues to be strong, ~__wlth a current overnll occupancy -of 9G. 3 percent. Occttpal~cy 'hould remain high given timat the three k!lown proposed developments are on hold and will not enter the market JIm the foreseeable future. 1 'C. f~hite ~age 2 Eveli if plann.ed. new uuih~ are completed, they will not compete -31reotly with a towmlhouse product. It is likely, rather, that a famlly-orlelited tow,~house product will be able to draw existing rentere out of smaller units, since leasin~ n~ents indiaate a stronger pre£erence for three-bedroom plans. The preliminar~ results of our field survey are summarized in time attaclxed outline. Please cull if you have auy questions. Siucerely, : President TIle Deans Organization // PLANNING COIIII~SION: 3-21-90 Agenda Item: 3-1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COlIIISSION NEE'rING Board Room - 14th Floor - 4080 Lemon Street - Riverside PLANNING COIIqlSSION CONSENT CALENDAR STAFF REPORT NOTE: The following will be presented to the Planning Commission as a consent calendar item. Unless specifically requested by the applicant at the time of consideration, this item may not be discussed and is subject to approval by the Commission under a single motion. CEOA: The following map has conformed to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. It has been determined that the individual map will not have a significant effect upon the environment. GENERAL PLAN: The following map has been determined to be inconsistent with the general plan and its elements, due to its density being in excess of that set forth in the Southwest Area Plan (8-16 DU/AC). However, the following map is within the City of Temecula which has not adopted a general plan. Therefore the following map is not subject to the provisions of the Southwest Area Plan. ORDINANCE NO. 659: It has been determined that in order to insure public health, safety and welfare, the map listed below will be subject to Ordinance 659, Development mitigation fee for residential development. ORDINANCE NO. 663: The conditions of approval for the following map will be amended to reflect the implementation of Ordinance 663 (Stephens Kangaroo Rat Hitigation). The conditions will be amended as follows: Add Condition No. 23 ORDINANCE NO. 460: The conditions of approval for the following map will be amended to reflect the implementation of Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460 (Park and Recreation Fees and Dedications). The conditions will be amended as follows: Add Condition No. 24 VESTING TRACT 23211 Consent CaT endar Staff Report Page 2 FINDINGS: There is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. RECOIIIENDATIONS: The applicant of the following map has requested an extension of time to allow for recordation of a final map. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval, based upon the above listed findings. VESTING TRACT NG. 23211 - D2 ENTERPRISES - Rancho California Area - First Supervisorial District - 128 Units - 7.3 Acres - South of Hargarita Road and Easterly of Horaga Road - Schedule A - R-3 Zone - EXTENSION OF TIME THROUGH May 31, 1991 - FIRST EXTENSION. RJM:aea 3-07-90 e' t Zontng Area: Rancho California Supervisor1·1 District: First E.A. IUnber 32219. Ragtonal Team No. ] Vesttrig Tentative Tract 23211 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT STAFF REPORT (.J 1. Appltunt: A t Montgomery 2. Engtneer/Rep.: ~)~ Enterprtses 3. T~pe of Reqtest: To butld· 128 unit condomtntum complex 4. Loutton: S. Extsttng Zonlng: 8. Surrounding Zoning 7. Site Land Use 8. Surrounding Land Uses g. Comprehensive General Plan Designation 10. Land DIvision Data: on one lot. South of Kargartta Road and East of Moraga Road. R-3-2500 R-1-10,000, R-3, R-3-2,500, R-1 The site supports a house and vacant land. Vacant lan~,apartments, stngle family res~denttal Land Use: CATEGORY I I)enstty: 8-20 D.U./·c. Total Acreage: 7.3 acres Total Lots: 128 units IXI Per Acre: 17.5 11. Agency Reconnendattons: Road: 03-09-88 Health: 03-16-88 Flood: 03-07-88 Fire: 03-10-88 Butld~ng and Safety: 03-11-88 HI. P·lomar: 01-12-88 12. Letters: Opposing/Supporting: None recetved 13. Sphere of Influence: Not wtthtn a Ctty Sphere ANALYSIS: Project Description eVesting" Tentative Tract Mop No. 23211, Amended No. 2 ts ·n ·ppllutton to clay·lop 7.3 acres tnto· 128 untt condomtntmum project, vtth · overall denstry of 17.53 du./ac. The project stte ts laceted south of )krgartta Rd. and east of Nor·g· ltd. tu the Rancho California zontng area. Lend Use/Zontno The MJect stte ourrently supports a stngle fmtly residence. Surrounding land .sea tnclude single fmtly reatdentt·l to the north end east end vaunt land ad- :lacefit to the stte to the east and vest. The adjacent propert to' the south ts currently vacant, but · 344 untt condan ntua project (TR 21608~ ' for as ·pproved the stto by the Board of Suporv4sors on 10/28/86, and has ben raftled as "Vesting" Tract No. 23304. The project stte is ourreetly zoned R-3-2500. Thts zontng (CZ 4500) ms ·pproved by the rd of Supervisors on 1:1/19/85. Ad:Jacent property to the west is also zoned 'B~SO0. *MJotntng property ts zoned R-3 to the south, R-I-/O,O00 to the R eastr(g:Z~4Ja~, sOproved 3/15/88), aM R-I across Narg·rita Rd. to the north. Vesttrig Tentathe Tract 23211 Staff Report Page 2 Destqn Consideration: The proposed 128 untt condomtntum project has been destgned tn accordance wtth the standards of the R-3-2500 (General Residential 2500 sq. ft. mtntmm zone. I f The project cons sts· Wo butldtng types (8 plex and 16 plex), and four differ- ent untt floor plans rangtrig from 750 sq. ft. to 1050 sq. ft. Zt's colors and architecture reflect a "Townhouse" theme. Due to the tract's vesttrig sautus, the foiltoeing addtttoM1 plans ~ere submitted for revtew tn compliance wtth ordinance 460; -Landscape and irrigation Plan -Gredtng Plan -Drainage P. lan. -Entry I1onaenautton -LIghting Plan These plans were found to be adequate and wtll be Implemented through the cond4- 1t ons of approva 1. Comprehensive 6eneraq Plan Consistency: The Comprehensive General Plan's Open Space and Conservation Element sho~s thts stte tn "Areas Not Designated As Open Space". The Land Use Element of the Campre- 1rig Area. The poltctes of the Rancho Caltfornta-Temecula Land Use Planntng Area saute that "Future land uses ~thtn thts area should generally be Category ! and Category Z! lend uses", Category Z land uses tnclude residential developments vtth densities ranging from 8 to 20 D.U./AC. It requires water and sever servtce and must be sewed by a arterial htgh~ay. The C~nty Health Department has a statement from the Rancho California klater DIstrict agreeing to serve domestic water to the project. The Eastern Nun~c(pal Ikter DIstrict has supplied the Health Dupart~ent brith a statement agreeing to allw the proJec~ sewer system to be connected to the sewers of the district. The site Is vlthtn a five minute fire response are, and Schedule A fire protec- Uoo ts required. The denstry as proposed by Vesting Tentative Tract De. 2J211 ts 17.53 cke111ng entta per acre. Raytree of the poltctes of the Land Use Elmeat tn the Comprehen- sive General Plan Indicates that the subject project ftta the requtrments of hiegot7 Z. residential It thts the. EJwtrementel Assessant: The 1nttta1 study fo~ Envtromentel .Assessment No. 32219 has Indicated that the subject stte ts located vlthtn the hebtUt range of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat. ned ts vlthtn the fit. Paloear $pectal Llghttng Are. The subject stte is also Idthtn the Tmecula Unton School Dtstrtct and the Elstnore Unton Htgh School DIs- trict. -These school dtstrtcta are Impacted by overcromltng. Vesttrig Tentative Tract 2321 Staff Report Page 3 Potential tEHctS upon the fit. Palomit Observatory can be mitigated through con- formInca vtth the conditions of approval and the Comprehensive General Plan's I1ount PaloEar $peCtll Ltghttng Area policies. The subject stte ts too urbantzed to be actual hebttat for the Stophans Kangaroo'Rat. Therefore no mtt4gatton 4s required. NtttgatJon of Impacts to the .Irfi's scheol and 11brsry vtll be accom- plished through the payment of mitigation fees prtor to the tssuance of butldtng ImrEtts. Ifith the tinlamentation of the above referenced mitigation, tt has been detemined that the proposed project vtll not have 'l significant adverse affect on the env4r- oment and a Negattve Decllratton has been prepared. Ftndtncjs: "Vesting" Tentative Tract No. 23211 ts an R-3-2500 1 lot statutory condo- mtntum project, wtth 128 untts. 2. The project stte currently supports one stngle 'faintly cl~elltng. Surrounding LInd Uses tnclude stngle faintly residential to the north and South, fist,and ~est.' " Tract 21608 i344 untt condmntntum project} has been ipproved on the adjacent property to the south. 5. Surrounding zontng conslats of R-l, R-3-2500, R-3 and R-1-10,000, R-A-2~,, R-3-3O0O, R-2 End A-2-20. Rev(w of the poltctes of the Land Use Element tn the Comprehensive General Plan tndtcltes that the subject project Ind the subject stte meet the requirements of Category I at thts ttme. 7. The lntttal study for Envtromentol Assessment No. 32219 has Indicated that the project w111 create no significant adverse trapacts upon the enviroment. CONCLU$I ON$ ~ 1. The proposal ts consistent ulth Ordlnanoe le. 348 and 460. 2. The proposal ts consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive knifE1 Plan. 3. The proposal ts cmeattble vtth area develolaent. 4. Potential envtromen. tal tEFaCtS Vtll be mitigated through adherence to -- conditions of approval. Vesttng Tentative Tract 232Z1 Staff Report Page 4 RECOIIeENDATIONS: llsed upon the ftndtngs and conclusions Incorporated tn thts staff report, Staff recoamwnds: ADOPTION of the Negattve Declaration for Envtromental Assessment No. 32219 based upon the findtngs ~ncorporated tnto the tntttal study and the conclusion that the proposed pro3ect kr111 not have a significant effect upon the envYfoment; and APPROVAL of VESTING TENTAT/VE TRACT NO. 23211, sub3ect to the attached conditions of approval. D~:$c 4/7/88 I llqt. / '! e I ' 'i ;. ' 1.1 AC. TO CONDO.PROJECT ~-~'- ~.... "':.._.L'.:_...'.~..A~T.. :,,oo.' . 1~_--~=- ' VTII i$tll IEllm IE]mllm ~ IJ' · ' aa. AnT MONTGOMERY .... ' -, ,; '|'~1 'CkedelioenANCHO CALIFORNIA nO. ART. jl0' · ~" EIMMM IO. OENERAL KEARNY RD.ART. 110' _._-- --- ILILII IlCOcde IllSlie liewe By D.O.T.41~| .. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL f~ IdJz r.~0 ~"t/) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 23211 DATE: EXPIRES: -STANDARD COIQITIOeIS The sotd¶vtder shall defend, tedentry, and hold he·less the County of Iflvers~de, 1as agents, officers, and employees f~om any cla~m, actton, or proceeding agates· the County of RIverside or tts agents, officers, or en~_loyees to attack, set astde, votd, or annul an approval o the County f f o RIverside, 1as advtsory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning VTP. 23211, Md. #2 wh4ch actton Is brought about vtthtn the tIN pertod provtded for tn California Government Code bctton 66499.37. The County of RIverside vtll promptly nottf the subdivider of any such clalm, action, or proceeding agetest ~e County of RIverside end w411 cooperate fully tn the defense. If the County fatls to promptly nottfy the subdivider f n o a ~y Such clatm, actton, or proceeding or fatls to cooperate fully tn the defense, the subd~vtder shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, ted·hetty, or hold her·less the Coun?,y of R~ vers t de. 2. The tentative subdivision shell comply Kith the State of California $utxltvtston IMp Act aM to all the require·eta of Ordinance 460, khedule A, unless eodtfled by the conditions 11steal bolw. Thts cond111onally a proved tentative mp Kill exptre t~o ars after the County of RIverside g~ard of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provtded by Ord4Mnce 460. 4. The tIM1 mp shell be prep·rid by a 11ceased land surveyor Subject to the require·has of the State of California Subdivision IMp Act and tn Oral ante 460. SO The subdivider shall Sutelt one copy of asotls report to the Itlverstde County Surveyor's Office and tmcoptes to the bierbeet of ktldtng and t stability end geological hie·Jr. The report shall address the so l s conditions of the stte. e If may grodtng ts proposed, the Subdivider shell Submtt one print of c_omerohenstve gradtrig Floe to the bierbeet of gutldtng and Safety. The In p a shall COmply Kith the Untfonm htldtng Code, Chapter 70, as mended by 0rdtanco 457 end ms amybe additionally provtded for tn these conditions of approval. ItSrig TEITATXVE 111ACT I0. Z321.S kd. #2 Ceedlttons ef aFpFewel Pale2 7. A grsdtng perndt shell be obtetned free the Deportment of ktldtn9 and Safety prtor to cmmencenent of any gradtng outstale of county mintsteed f road rtght o 8. My delinquent property taxes shell be potd prtor to recordatton of the ftnal Imp. The subdhtder shall comply vtth the street Improvement recomendattons outltned te the Rherstde County Road Deportaent's letter dated 3-9-88, a copy of uhtch ts attached. ~.0. Legal access as requtred by Ordinance 460 shall be provtded from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. ~.Z. M1 road easements shall be offered for dedication to the publlc and shall conttnue tn force unttl the overntng body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications sha~1 be free from all encun~rances as approved Easements, vhen requtred for roadway slopes, dratnage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the ftnal map tf theY are located vtthtn the land dtvtston boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as dtrected by the County Surveyor. ~.3. Mater and severage dtsposal facilities abel1 be Installed tn accordance ~tth the provisions set forth te the RIverside County Health Deportment's h letter dated 3-Z6-88, a copy of vhtch ts attaced. The subdivider shall comply vtth the flood control recommendations n outltned by the RIverside County Flood Co fro1 Dtstrtct's letter dated 3-7-88, a copy of uhtch ts attached. if the land dtvtston 11as v4thtn an adopted flood control drltnage area pursuant to Sectton 10,25 of Ordinance 460 lppro rtate fees for the construction of area dratMge facilities sha~l be ~oTlectad by the bad Comdsstoner. The subdivider shall comply vtth the. fire Improvement recommendations eutltned tn the County Ftre' IIershaT's letter dated 3-Z0-88, a copy of uhlch ts attached. The s, bdtvtder sial1 cmply vtth the recomendattons outltned tn the letter dated 3-11-88 from the RIverside County Deportment of ktldtng and Safety o Subdhtston phastng, Including any proposed coneon open spoce area taproVement phistag, tf appltcableo shall be subject to planntng Deportment approval. My proposed phastng shall provtde for adequate )aSTIR6 TBfTAllVE TIACT 10. 1321X/ted. (nedtUnes of AFal PIle3 vehicular access to all lots tn nach phase, end shall substJnttally conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. !8. Lots created by thts subdivision shell comply wtth the following: a. Lots created by thts subdivision shall be tn conforminn with the daveloin·ha standards of the R-3-2500 zone. 6rmled but undeveloped land shall be mmtntmtned In · ned-free condition end shell be either planted with tat·rim landscaping or tided with other eroston control seaauras as ·pproved by the ST°tractor of Building and Safety. c. Trash bins, loadtrig areas and tactdental storage areas shall be located ·way and vtsually screened frmn surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping. d. Btke racks an blke lockers tn sufficient quanatty shall be provtded tn convenient locations to facilitate btke access to the pro3ect area. Prior to RECORDATXON of the ftnal mp the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prtor to the recordaUon of the ftnal map the applicant shall su~tt uTttten clearances to the RIverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outltned tn the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Ftre Deparment County Flood Conare1 County health Department County Planntng Department Prior to reconlmtlon of the final imp, the subdivider shell sulatt the documents to the Plmnnlng Department for raylaw, ~htch fell°w· trig shell be su Jet to the rappreys1 of that department and the docueen s b c Offico of the Count~ Counsel: 1) A declmretton of covonmnts, conditions and restrictions; and YESTIlE TEXTATIVE TIACT I0. 132LT kid. bndiUoas of Allewe1 Paige4 2) A sample documents conve trig tttle to the purchaser of an 1Mtvtdual lot or untt ,hl~ provtdes that the declaration of covenants, co dtttons and restrictions Is tncorpo ated therein by n ~ The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted 4'or revtw shall (e provide for I fiatmum term of 60 years, (b) profide for the establishmat of I property ovners' association tonerteed of the meets of each Individual lot or anti, (c) provide for eueershtp of the connon Ires by etther the property whets' association or the oreera of each Individual lots or untt as tenants tn conmen and (d) conlath the following provisions verbsUm: llotvtthstandtn any provision tn thts Declaration contrary, the ~ollovtng provisions shall apply: to the (as amended by P.C. 4-20-B8 ) The property smers' assectatton established herein shall manage and continuously maintain the 'cannon aren't more particularly described on Exhibit ,A , attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common iTEm', or any part thereof, absent the prior vrttte~ consent of the f County of Planntng Nrector o the RIverside or the County's successor-In-interest. The property ovners' association shall have the rtght to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of Binlathing the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the property of any such oiner vho defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. As assessment 1ten, once established, shall not be subordinated to any encumbrance other than a first trust deed or first mort age, rode in and for value and of record prior to ~e assessment ~t~en.fatth Thts Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' mended or proper deanaxed therefrom absent the prtor vrttten consent of the ~aontng Director of the County of Rtvorslde or the County's :uccessor-tn-tnterest. A proposed amendment shall be considered *substantial' tf It affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area'. end Reoulattons , if an.v , this Declaration shall cont.rol. (As amended b P.C. 4-20-88) Once approved, the declaration of co eftants, ~e~tions end v restrictions shall be recorded It the same tim that the final mp ts lIESTilE TBITATiVE 11UiCT lID. Z3211 kid. #2 Cedtttms of AFFaffll Fags5 d. The developer shall COBpI~ With the foiltoeing larhey landscaping condtttons: x) Prfor to recordatton of the ftnal mp the developer shell ftle an application With the County for the formtton of or annexation to, · parksay mint·hence dtstrtct or County krvtce Area for Iirgsrtta bad tn accordance With the Landscaping end Llghttng Act of X972o unless the project ts Withtn an extsttng parkway mt neehence dtstrt ct. 2) 'Prtor to the tssusnce of butldtng permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landsceptng end Irrigation plans from the County bad and Planntng Deparment. All landscaping and Irrigation plans and s tftcattons shall be repared tna vTth the reprbductble format suitalOe for peruanent ftltng County Road Departmet. 3) The developor shell post s landscape potromance bond vh4ch shall be roleused concurrently With the role·s· of subdivision perfoe·rice bonds, gust'ante·Jag the vlabt14ty of lll landscaping vhtch vtll be Installed prtor to the assumption of the mint·hence responstbtlltJr by the district. a) The developer, the developer' s successors-In-Interest or ass1 ees, shall be responsible for all parkway lendscaptng aatn~l:nence unit1 such tie is maintenance is taken over by the district. The developor shall be responsible for mint·hence end u keep of all slopes, lsndscspod ereu arid Irrigation systems unttF such ttm is those oporsttons ere the responsibilities of other porttes as approvod bJ~ the Plenntng Direclef. Prtor to recorderton of the ftnal mr, on Envtromental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared In conjunction With the ftnal ap to delineate 1denttried envtrome tel concerns end shall be permnently n fried With the offtce of the County 5urveJmr. A copy of the ECS shall · rev4w and appreval. be eraemitted to the Planning.Department/~ r The ·pproved ECS shill be forwarded with coptie of the recorded ftnsl map to the Plsnntng Department and the Department of htldtng end g. The foilrating note shall be placed on the Env4romental Constraints Sheet: 'Thts proper ts located withtn thtrty (30) atleS Of Hount Palore·r Observatory. ~1 proposed outrico 11ghttng systems shell r J~STINI 1BITATIV~ ~ W. 23211 Aid. #2 Coed~Uoms of line6 conFly vtth the California Znstttute of Technology, Palmar Observatory_ recamendattons dated 1-%2-88, a copy of ,h4ch Is on ftle tn the RIverside County bperme t of ktldtng end h ely end the n f RiversIda County Planning Datafluent." Prtor to the tssuance of GRADZIG PERHXTS the folioring conditions shall be sat1 sit ed: Prtor to the tssuance of gradtrig Fernfits datatled conenon open space are landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planntng DataFluent approval for the phase of development tn process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, end shall provtde for the fol 1 or1 ng. 1. Permanent automttc lrrtgat4on systems shell be Installed on landscaped Irons requiring Irrigation. 2. Landscape screening vhere requtred shall be destgned to be opaque up to a Etatuna hetght of stx (6) feet at mturtty. All uttllty servtce areas end enclosures shall be screened from vtev idth landscaping end decorative berttars or baffle treaUnents, as approved by the Plann4ng D~rector. Utilities shall be placed underground. 4. Parkeys end landscaped butldtng setbacks shall be landscaped to provtde vtsual screening or a transition 1non the prtmary use area of the stte. Landscape elmenOs shall tnclude firth berntrig, ground cover, shrubs end spectee~ trek tn con3unctton vtth meandering stdNlks, benches end other pedestrian amentOtes vhere appropriate as approved by the Planntng Del)lrtmnt. S. Landscaping plans shall Incorporate the use of spec4men accent trees at ke~ vtsual focal petals vtthtn the pro3ect. 6. idhero street trees cannot be planted vtthtn right-of-ray of hoeriot streets and roJect rkwys due to Insufficient red rtght-of-v~ym they shuT1 be p~nted outstde of the road h rtg t-of-ely. 7. Landscaping plans shall Incorporate nottve and drought tolerant plants ewre appreprtate. 8. All extsttng spectlm Ores and significant rock outcrop 1rigs on sub ect property shall be shove on the pre:lect's gred]Fng plans the sha41 note those to be removed, reincared and/or retetued. and liSTInG TEIT&TZSS TIACT I0. 232~X kid. Cldtttem ef AFINlw·I IMle7 9. All trees shall be Etateam double staked. growtag trees shall be st·el staked. lieaker ·rid/or slow b. My oak trees removed vtth four (4) 1rich or larger trunk dtamters shall be re laced on · ten (ZO) to one (Z) beats Is ·pproved by the Pl·nnlng D~rector. Iteplacment trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. c. If the Imo3ect ts to be phased, prtor to the approval of 9rad4n9 refits, an overall conceptual gradtag plan shall be sub·fitted to the ~11anntng Dtrector for approval. The 1an shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detatled radtng ~ans for lndtvtdua phases of develolaent and shall tnclugde the fo~lotrlng: 1 :Z. Techniques .htch vtll be uttllzed to prevent ernston and sedtmentatton durtng and after the gradtag process. 2) ~hproxtmate ttm frames for tadtag and Identification of areas tch my be graded durtng the ~tgher probability retn months of aanuary through Parch 3) Preliminary lad and ruad~ay elevations de 4) Areas of temorar~ grodtng outatde of a larttcular phase M1 cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural tarrata and exceeding ten ~AOe) feet tn verttcal he ght shall be contour-graded tncorporettng following grading ~ tec ntques: The ·le of the rnded slot· shall be gradually adjusted to the angle ongf the natura1~ tarrata. Mgular form shall be discouraged. The graded fore shall reflect the utural rwnded tarrata. The toes and tops of slopes shell be rounded vlth curves vtth red11 destg~ed tn proportion to the total betght of the slopes inhere dratMge and stablitany perEta such rounding. 4) ilere cut or 1tll slolm exceed 300 feet tn bertzontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved tn · continuous, eedulattng foshtoe. e. Prior to the 1·suenon of redtag pemtts, the developer shall provtde evtdence to the DIrector o4~ ktldtng and bfe_ty that all adjacent off-·tie manufactured slopes have recorded slope easemats and that e, slope mtntenance responsibilities have been uslgned as approved by the Dtrector of ButldSng and Safety. Prior to the tssuance of gradtrig peretts, a quallfied paleontologist shall be ratateed by the developer for consultation and cement on the proposed gradtrig idth respect to potential paleontologtcal tapacts. Should the paleontologist find the petentis1 ts htgh for tapact trapact to significant resources, a pre-grade t betasen the meet ng paleontologist and the excavation end tadtrig contractor shall be arranged. Mhen necessary, the peleontoIIogtst or representsthe shall have the anthertry to temporarily dhert, redtract or hell gradtrig acthtty to a11o~ recovery of fosstls. Prtor to the tssuance of BUZLDXNG PERNZTS the folioring conditions shall be satisfied: No butldtng pemtts shell he tssued by the County of RIverside for a~y residential lot/untt ~lthtn the pro3ect boundary unttl the developer' s successor' s-In-Interest provtdes evtdence of compltance vlth publlc factltty ftnanct measures. A cash sm~ of ont-hundred dollars ($ZO0)per lot/untt sh~ be dapos ted vtth the RIverside 1 1 County Department of Butldtng and Safety as atttgatton for publlc 1 tbrary developnent. Ce de f n Bulldlng and c study shall he per omed by a acoustical engtneer to establish appropriate wiltgallon measures that shall be ap 1ted to tndtvldaal d~e111ng untts vlthtn the subdivision d aPmCtent lntertor eotse levels to 45 Ldn. to re ace M1 butldt_n9 plans for all ne~ structures shall Incorporate, all requtred elmants from the subdhtston's approved fire protection plan as epproved ~ the County Ftru lirahal. ktldtng elevations shall be tn substantial conformsrice vtth that shone on Exhtbtt i. Iktortals used tn the construction of all buildings shall be tn substonttal conformrice vtth that shone on Exhtbtt I (Color Elevations) and Exhtbtt C (llatorlals hard). These are as lollmesa natartal Color lieof Mphelt Shtngles tlalls Iksontto $htplap Stdtng charcoal (z) Old Quaker #405 or Old Quaker WESTERn TBffATZVE 11MCT nO. ~3211 bd. #2 Cemdftlens of 4;ru;al Trim llood All M111ngs to be constructed destgned end constructed ~lth ftre · pproved by the County Ftre IMrshal. Old Quaker wtthln thls subdhlston shall be retardant (Class A) ~oofs as g. Roof-mounted mchantcal equtl~ent shall not be permitted ~tthtn the I~ ktld1 separation between ell buildings Including fireplaces shall not ben~ess then ten (10) feet. t. All street stde yard setbacks shall be a adnlmu~ of ten (10) feet. Prtor to the tssuance of OCCUPANCY PER~TS the follo~ng conditions shall be satisfied: All landscaping end Irrigation shall be Installed In accordance vtth epproved plans prior to the tssuance of occupancy perrates. seasonal conditions do not parmtt planting, tntertm landscaping and eroston control measures shall be uttltzed as approved by the Planntng Dtrector and the Otrector of Butldtn9 and Safety. b. A monument st shall be constructed, and shall be tn substantial c fifofinance ~ o tt~nExhlbtt E, !)H:bc 4/7/88 23211, AId. #2 VESTZNG TENTATIVE TRACT NO. Conditions of Approval Page 10 23. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 24. The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with CSA 143 which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land divider has provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the City Council prior to the recordation of the final map. RaM:aea 3-07-90 DAlE SIANP OCT 19 1989 ::L.. drE::DiD - COUrlC,u PLanninG DEPARClTIEIlC RIVERSIDE COUNTY pLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Please complete two (2} copies of this application form. The approp~P~Ftel te~Bt process this request is listed on the current fee schedule. RIVER2!DE of t~v~nts specified by the R~verside County Land D~v~s~ Ordinance for land d~vis~ons or the R~vers~de County Land Use Ordinance for Variances, Conditional Use Pem~ts, and Public Use Pem~ts. CASE NO: Tract/Vested .Tract Map 23211 itar/CUP/PUP ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO(s) 921-370-004 EXTENSIDN REQUEST: First X Second Third NDTE: Only Land Divisions may obtain a second or third extension of time. 2 Applicant's Name D Enterprises Hailing Address 28465 Front Street, Suite 204 Ae,mecu~ Ca. 92390 Signature / [ (~_~,x ' ~,x/ Phone 714-699-1322 Owner' s Name Supervtsortal District Zoning Di stri or/Area Xntttal Approval First EXtension to Second Extension to Marstan Corporation 1225 W. 190th Street, Suite 150 Ca. 90248 OFFICE USE ONLY Third Extension to Phone 714-676-5766 213-532-4550 Hearing Dates: Planning Conm~tsston Board of Supervisors Request Denied Approved Approved Approved PD 85-37 4080 LEMON STREET. 9" FLOOR RIVERSIDE CALIFORNhG 9250'-3657 (T14= 7F..,T-e161 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOk: INDIO. CALIFORNIA 9220~ (619,342-52"..' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: MTG: DEPT: 8/1~/90 PLNG TZTLE: PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 675 Recommendation: Receive and File DEPT HD , CITY ATTY/~~ CITY MGR APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPR ESENTAT IVE: PROPOSAL: LOCAT ION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: STAFFRPT\PUP675 Don Coop Larry Markham Request to permit church (Calvary Baptist) in an existing industrial/commercial center. Northeast of Enterprise Circle West, southwest of Commerce Center Drive. M-SC ( Manufacturing - Service Commercial ) North: M-SC South: M-SC East: M-SC West: M-SC Not requested. I ndustrial/Commercial Center North: South: East: West: Industrial/Commercial Industrial/Commercial Industrial/Commercial Industrial/Commercial Number of Acres: Number of Units: Total size of combined units: 0.53 acres 2 8,790sq.ft. PUP 675 is a request to permit an existing church ( Calvary Baptist) in an existing industrial/commercial center. Due to inadequate parking allotted to the units in question, PUP 675 was approved on April 18, 1990 by the Riverside County Planning Commission with a special review of parking agreement under which existing tenants allow use of their parking spaces during the church's hours of operations. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Public Use Permit No. 675 is an application to establish a church in an existing light industrial shell building· The project site is located northeast of Enterprise Circle, west and southwest of Commerce Center Drive in Commerce Park in the City of Temecula. The applicant proposes to use two units totaling approximately 8,790 square feet for assembly, office and concurrent child care. Staff recommends that the City Council: Receive and File Public Use Permit No. 675, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, based on findings contained in the Staff Report. RA:ks Attachments: 1. Vicinity Maps 2. Conditions of Approval I PU 675 VAC, I LAND USE IND. VAC ~ · VAC VAC · I1 a~OPPING SELF- CENTER STOR · VAC ' m VAC T VAC. App. CAVALRY CHAPEL LOC,utONAL Idse CHURCH ' Area TEIdECULA Sup.Dim. I ST: .t Sec. 35 T. TS.R.3W. Assess~r's Bk. 921 Pg. 46 ' Circulatk~ JEFFERSON AVE-- -MAJOR 100' Element ~STER RD.- - -MAJOR-- 100' ~,. --- ~ ' Rd. Bk. Pg.55C DmeO3/O3/9ODrawn By RG./1BU~k'. X~ ' ~' ' 1'- ' 20;:)'* tWVERSIDE CXX.RVTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT No sc,,E f EXISTING ZO_NING · [ 3 ':-I/C-P · Illll lieram' R-R * I App. CAVALRY CHAPEL Use CHURCH Ares TEMECULA Sec. 35 T.TS, FL3W. MIll Sup.OistlST 921 Pg. 46 Circulation JEFFERSON AVE .....MAJOR - -100' ElmnBnt WINCHESTER RD.- .... MAJOR .....100' "-'-t 'Rd,, Bk. 1~.55C DmttO:S/03/90Drlwn By RG./TTX./~. ~ 20~ RIVERSIDE CCXJVTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,,o :c,,~ I PU 675 C S.W.A.P. ! S COMMER AL f · ENERAL LIGHT INI~ LI J App. CAVALRY CHAPEL LOCATIONI, L MAIJ UM CHURCH ., Arm TEMECULA . S~c. 35 T.T$,R. 3W. A-t,sser'$ Bk. 921 leg. 48 .e · (~) Cir~tion JEFFERSON AVE .... MAJOR -- 100' ,. '~ Element WINCHESTER RD.- .... MAJOR .... 100' !_.~,=,-'"q 'R~I.'Bk. I:g.55C DateO3/O3/9ODrmwn By RG./I~L/zr. X~k,A : ' 1'- zoO' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,~o sca~.~ R]:VERS]:DE COUNTY PLANN]:NG DEPARTNENT COND]:TZONS OF APPROVAL Den Coop - Calvary Chapel 28000 Front Street Tlmecula, CA 92390 PUBLZC USE PEINZT NO. 675 Prolect Description: Church Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-480-023 Area: Temecula The use hereby permitted Is for a church Including assembly area, office, and concurrent childcare area located within Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 921-480-023. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of RIverside, tts agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding sgatnst the County of Riverside or tts agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, votd, or annul, 8n approval of the County of Riverside, tts advtsory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning PUBLIC USE PERNIT NO. 675. The County of RIverside wtll promptly nottry the permittee of any such claim, actton, or proceeding agethat the County of RIverside and will cooperate fully tn the defense. If the County fatls to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fatls to cooperate fully In the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. This approval shall be used wtthtn two (2) years of approval date; othervise tt shall become null and void end of no effect whatsoever. By use 1s meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by thts approval wtthtn the two (2) year pertod which ts thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by thts approval. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as sho~n on plot plan marked Exhtbtt A, or as mended by these conditions. Zn the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a pertodor one (1) year ore ore, thts approval shall become null end void. Any outstde 11ghttng shall be hooded and directed so ms not to shine dtrectly upon adlotnlng property or publlc rights-of-way. The applicant shell comply vtth the street Improvement recommendations outltned tn the County Road Department transmlttsl dated 10-12-89, a copy of~htch ts attached. Water end severage dtsposal facilities shell be Installed tn accordance wtth the provisions set forth In the RIverside County Health Department transmittel dated 10-10-8g, a copy of whtch Is attached. Flood protection shall be provtded tn accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Dtstrtct transmittel dated 9-12-89, a copy of which ts attached. PUBLIC USE PEINZT IK). 675 Condfttons of Approval Page 2 01 2. 13, 14, 6e Ftre protection shall be provtded tn accordance with the appropriate sectton of Ordinance 546 and the County FIre Narden's transmittel dated 8-23-89, a copy of whtch ts attached. The applicant shall comply wtth the recommendations set forth tn the Department of Bulldtn9 and Safety Land Use Sectton transmittel dated 10- 2-89, a copy of which ts attached. All landscaped areas shall be planted tn accordance with Plot Plan No. 9193 approved landscape, Irrigation and shadtng plans prior to the tssuance of occupancy permtts. An automatic sprinkler dyetam shall be 1natalled and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a vtable grouch condition. Planting wtthtn ten (10) feet of an entry or extt drtveway shall not be bermttted to grow htgher than thtrty (30) inches. A minimum of 94 parktng spaces shall be provtded in accordance with Sectton 18.12, RIverside County Ordinance No. 348 and wtth the Special Parking Revtew contained wtthln the staff report for Publlc Use Permit No. 675. A mtntmum of three (3) handicapped parktng spaces shall be provtded as shorn on Exhtblt A. Each parktng space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectortzed sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the Znternattonal Symbol of Accessibility. The stgn shall not be smaller than 70 square Inches tn area and shall be centered at the tntertor end of the parktng space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parktng space ftnlshed grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 1riches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall alsobe posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to theoff-street parktng facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 clearly and conspicuously states the folioring: 'Unauthorized vehtcles not displaying distinguishing placards or 11cans, plates tssued forphyslcallyhendtc~ppedpersonsmaybetoved away at ovner'a expense. Toyed vehicles Bay be reclaimed at .. or by telephoning Zn addltton to the above requirements, the surface of each parktng place shall have a surface Identification atgn duplicating the symbol of accessibility tn blue patnt of at least 3 mquare feet tn size. Prior t o the tasuanceofoccupancypermtts the follovtngaddttlona1 and/or rtvtsed plans ~ha11 be submitted for Planntng Department approval: Stgntng Program Flcorplans shall be tn substantial conformance wtth that eho~n on Exhtblt INBLZC USE PBNZT NO. 675 Conditions of Approval Page3 Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum hetght of six (6) feet at maturity. Landscaping plans shall Incorporate the use of Spectmen canopy trees along Itreets end wtthtn the parktng areas, 19, All landscaping end Irrigation shall be Installed tn accordance with el}proved plans prtor to the issuance of occupancy permtts. 20. 21, Publlc Use Permtt No. 675 parmtts a church assembly area, and associated offtces and concurrent childcare area, No day school or daycare are permitted. Publlc Use Permtt No, 675 is permitted for the foliofling hours of operation: 7 p.m.- 9 p.m. Ifednesdays and all day on Sundays. Prtor to tssuance of occupancy permtts, all requtred landscape planttng and Irrigation shall have been Installed and be tn a condition acceptable to the Director of Butldtng and Safety, The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, dtsease or pests, The Irrigation system shall be properly constructed and tn good working order. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complted wtth prtor to occupancy or any use alloffed by thts parmtt. Thts permtt shall become null and votd after4-18-95. (Added at Planntng Commission 4-18-90), LD:bc,lgg 3/27/90 4119/90 SUBMI'I'FAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM: Planning De~oa~i,,ent SUBMFFFAL DATE: Nay 21, 1990 SUBJECT: Notice of Decision of Permit Acted on by the Planning Cu.~ission on April 18, 1990. RECOMMENDED MOTION: RECEIVE AND Fn.~. the Notice of Decision for the case acted on by the Planning C~L~.i ssion on April 18, 1990. ADOPTED the Negative Declaration for E.A. Number 34142 based on the findings incorporated in the environcental assessment an~. t_ha conclusion that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the enviroment; and, APPNDVED the PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 675 subject to the attached conditions and based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Planning Jo ards, Planning Di :~cto · r r PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast of Enterprise Circle West Southwest of C~iLerce Center Drive BACKGROUND: PUP 675 is a request to permit an existing church (Calvary Baptist) in an existing industrial/ommercial center. Due to i~_dequate parking allotted to the units in question, PUP 675 was approve] with a Special Paview of Parking agreement under which existing tenants allow use of their parking spaoes during the church's hours of operations. 5/21/90 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNXNG C(ICHZSSION NINUTES April 18, 1990 sstoner Turner questioned the rtdge 1the poltcy and asked how did staff thts matter. Hs. Dobson explained how they determined the height of the relation to the ridge line. TESTIMONY Susan Anthony, have questions and requested a two week Way Indicated they have read the staff report and regarding the conditions. Oue to thts, she :e NOTION: Upon morton by and unanimously cartted, the Cmxntsstl Parcel Map No. 24742 to Nay 16, 1990 at seconded by Comtsstoner Donehoe Change of Zone 5530 and Coa~tsstoner Turner at this point expressed Involving the Santa Rosa Poltcy and the Interpretation of poltctes tnvolvtn and he Nanted to know tf these poltctes could be defined and explained would know what the rules are. Mr. Rtchards stated that Harshall on this matter and the Commission should be receiving something on tier. (AGENDA ITEM 3-5 - Tape 2A) PUBLIC USE PERMIT 675 - EA 34142 - Calvary Chapel - Temecula Area - First SupervlsoHal Dtstrtct- 0.53/acres, southeast of Rider Nay, northeast of Enterprise Ctrcle West - PROJECT: Permit church tn existing Industrial shell building (tn City of Tenecula) The heartrig opened at 11:05 a.m. and was closed at 11:12 a.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoptton of the Negattve Declaration for EA 34142 based on the ftndtng that the proposed use wtll not have a significant effect on the environment and approval of Publlc Use Permit 675 subject to the conditions of approval. The applicant ts opostng to establish a church in a extsttng ltght 1 Industrial she 1 building. ~hhe project stte ts located northeast of Enterprise Ctrcle, west and southwest of Cc, merce Center Drtve tn Commerce Park tn the Ctty of Temecula. Staff noted that the primary concerns of thts project ts compatibility and parktrig. Current uses tn the commerce park tnclude construction company offtces, graphtc arts, carpet sales and cleaning, shopptn9 consultants, automotive mchtn~ng and glass, ctvtl engineering and a beauty school. The stte ts currently zoned N-SC whtle the surrounding zontng tncludes N-SC and C-1/C-P. The prtmry concerns associated with the establtshment of this use was the amount of parktrig required. Ordinance No. 348 requtred 94 parktng spaces for 3300 square feet of assembly area. The applicant has submitted a request for spade1 revtew of parktrig requesting a shared parktrig arrangement with other Cameroe Park tenants. Letters from 11 tenants with a total of 115 spaces were submitted agreetag to allow the Calvary Chapel to use thetr spaces 811 day Sunday end from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. on Wednesdays. The okmer Of the buildings have tndtcated that future tenants will be asked for the same pe of agreement. Stnce the busthess hours of operation do not confllct with tt~church's hours, . staff not object to thts arrangement 24 R/¥ERSZDE COUNTY PLANNING CONHISSTON HINUTES April 18, 1990 TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT Anthony Polo, 41750 Winchester Avenue, Temecula agreed with the recommendations of staff however he had a question on Condition #15 that states that prior to issuance of occupancy permit a signing program shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. Mr. Polo said he believes the underlying plot plan has a general signing program that ms approved on it. His request ms for the signing program to be optional. Ms. Dobson said she knows the sign is on the building but it ms not shown on the exhibit. She said she did not know anything about a general signing of the agreement. Mr. Balys said if Mr. Polo can show documentation regarding the underlying stgntng program then the condition woul'd be met. Commissioner Turner said there is no time limit on the project. He suggested a time ltmtt of five years. Nr. Polo had no objection. ADDED - Condition t24 - This permit shall become null and void on p;~ 18, 1995. There ms no one present in opposition. Hearing closed at 11:12 a.m. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Public Use Permit No. 675 is an application to permit a church in an existing light industrial park; the units proposed for use are located northeast of Enterprise Circle West and southwest of Commerce Center Drive in the City of Temecula; current tenants in the industrial park include construction offices, carpet sales and cleaning, graphic arts, shopping consultant, automotive machining and glass, civil engineering, and a beauty school; the site is zoned N-SC; surrounding zoning includes M-SC and C-l/C-P; the site is designated Light Industrial on the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP): SWAP policies and Ordinance No. 348 allow public uses in any zone or designation provided that use can be found to be compatible, have adequate services and wtll not Jeopardize public health, safety or welfare; the proposed use requires 94 parking spaces for 3300 square feet of assemble area; the applicant submitted a Special Review of parking requesting a shared parking arrangement with the park's other tenantst letters submitted by 11 tenants committed 115 parking spaces for use by Cavalry Baptist during the church's hours of operation; the tenants business hours range from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday thru Friday; the church's hours are from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on lednesday and all d~y Sunday; all environmental concerns ere addressed on the under13rlng plot plan (PP 9193) and mitigated by tt's conditions of approval; there ts reasonable probability that the project wtll be consistent wtth the general lan proposal betn considered or~htch wtll be studied wlthtn a reasonabV; ttme; there ts Vtttle or no probabtlt of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general ~an if the project is ultimately Inconsistent wtth the plan; and the project cempltes rlth all other applicable requtremnts of state law and loul ordinances. The proposed use ts consistent wtth the Southwest Area Commmntty Plan and Ordinance No. 348; the proposed use ts considered to be compatible wtth the existing uses due to the RXVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG CONHISSXON MZNUTES April 18, 1990 lack of overlap in the businesses and the church's hours of operation and all environmental concerns have been mitigated to a level of insignificance. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Donahoe, and unanimously carHed, the Comtsston recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 34142, approval of Public Use Permit 675 subject to the conditions of approval as amended and based on the findings and conclusions. ENDA ITEM 3-6 - Tape 2A) .. T MAP NO, 24951-R - Martlyn & Rachel Stockdale - Alberhill Area - First $upe sofia1 District - north of Coal Ave - I lot - 28~ acres - M-SC Zone - PRO3EC Reversion to Acreage The hearing ned at 11:14 a,m, and was continued to 9:30 a,m, on July 18, 1990, d Approval of Tentative Tract Map No, 24951, Amended No. 1, Roa Correction No 1 subject to the conditions of approval and based on the findings and conclusion in the staff report, The applicant is proposing to revert to acreage 25 lots n 29.52 acres into one parcel, The project site is located north of Coal Avenu and west of Pierce Street in the Alberht11 area within the City of Lake Elsin e sphere of Influence, Presently the site is vacant land whtle the surroundi' adjacent land uses are also vacant land and also there are some scattered res nttal, Currently the site is zoned N-SC and the surrounding zoning is R-R, C, M-RA, M-1 and the City of Lake Elstnore. The project at hand is cons' tent with the Category II land uses and the Elstnore Valley Subarea Policies, S ff finds the project compatible with area development and . omprehenstve General Plan. Staff amended the following conditions in the s ,ff report. Finding t3 - AMENDED to read: Surrounding ning is M-SC, M-l, R-R, M-RA and the City of Lake Elstnore. Finding t5 - Surrounding adjacent land uses are m vacant land and scattered residential. Staff noted they have received m letter regarding road dedication and they have submitted tt to the Commission. Commissioner Turner stated the letter that ms passed out states that Cty :';";:.';:; :'j'::': · s t f aid Rot feel this was a recmmendatton for continuance, Zoning Area: City of Temecula Supervisorial District: First E.A. Number: 34142 Regional Team No. One PUBLIC USE PERMIT 675 Planning Commission: Agenda Item No. 3-5 4-18-90 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT STAFF REPORT 1. Applicant: 2. Engineer/Rep: 3. Type of Request: 4. Location: 5. Existing Zoning: 6. Surrounding Zoning: 7. Site Characteristics: 8. Area Characteristics: Comprehensive General Plan Designation: 10. Agency Recommendations: 12. Letters: 13. Sphere of Influence: Don Coop - Calvary Chapel Larry Markham Establish church in industrial shell building Northeast of Enterprise Circle West, southwest of Commerce Center Drive M-SC C-l/C-P, M-SC, C-P-S Existing mixed use Industrial/Commercial Center Industr i a3/Commerc i al buildings, office buildings Light shell Southwest Area Community Plan Land Use: LI - Light Industrial Open Space/Cons: Area Not Designated See Letter Dated: Road: 10-12-89 Health: 10-10-89 Flood: 9-12-89 Fire: 8-23-89 Bldg.& Safety: Land Use: 10-2-89 Opposing/Supporting: 11 In City of Temecula ANAt YSIS: Pro.iect nescrintion: Public Use Permit No. 675 is an application to establish a church in a existing light industrial shell building. The project site is located northeast of Enterprise Circle, west and southwest of Commerce Center Drive in Commerce Park in the City of Temecula. The applicant proposes to use two units totaling approximately 8790 square feet for assembly, office and concurrent child care. PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 675 Staff Report Page 2 land Use/7oninq: Current uses in Commerce Park include construction company offices, graphic arts, carpet sales and cleaning, shopping consultants, automotive machining and glass, civil engineering and a beauty school. The site is zoned M-SC. Surrounding zoning includes M-SC and C-1/C-P. Pro.iect Consistency/Compatibility: The subject site is designated Light Industrial on the Southwest Area Community Plan. Public uses such as schools or churches are allowed in any zone or General Plan Designation if the use can be found consistent with applicable ordinances and compatible with area development. Due to the generally low intensity nature of the existing tenants in the surrounding units and the lack of conflict in the hours of operation between the church and those businesses, the church is not considered to be in conflict. The primary concerns associated with the establishment of this use was the amount of parking required. Ordinance No. 348 required 94 parking spaces for 3300 square feet of assembly area. The units in question are only allotted 24 of the 158 spaces on site. The applicant submitted a request for Special Review of Parking requesting a shared parking arrangement with other Commerce Park tenants. Letters from 11 tenants with a total of 115 spaces were submitted agreeing to allow Calvary Chapel to use their spaces all day Sunday and from 7 pm to 9 pm of Wednesdays. The owner of the buildings have indicated future tenants will be asked for the same agreement. Since the business' hours of operation do not conflict with the church's hours, staff does not object to this arrangement. Public uses must have adequate services, and circulation available to the site. All services are available and road improvements are in place. rnvironmental Analysis: The initial study for Environmental Assessment No. 34142 indicated the following concerns: fault hazard zone, liquefaction zone and inadequate parking. Fault hazard and liquefaction have been addressed through studies and conditions of approval on Plot Plan 9193, the case under which the units were constructed. The parking issue was addressed in the previous section, Project Consistency, FINDINGS: Public Use Permit No. 675 is an application to permit a church is an existing light industrial park. The units proposed for use are located northeast of Enterprise Circle West and southwest of Commerce Center Drive in the City of Temecula. · UBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 675 Staff Report Page 3 Current tenants in the industrial park include construction offices, carpet sales and cleaning, graphic arts, shopping consultant, automotive machining and glass, civil engineering, and a beauty school. 4. The site is zoned H-SC. Surrounding zoning includes M-SC and C-1/C-P. 5. The site is designated Light Industrial on the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP)· 10. 11. 12. SWAP policies and Ordinance No. 348 allow public uses in any zone or designation provided that use can be found to be compatible, have adequate services and will not jeopardize public health, safety or welfare· The proposed use requires 94 parking spaces for 3300 square feet of assemble area. The applicant submitted a Special Review of parking requesting a shared parking arrangement with the park's other tenants. Letters submitted by 11 tenants committed 115 parking spaces for use by Cavalry Baptist during the church's hours of operation. The tenants business hours range from 7:00 am to 5:30 pm, monday thru friday. The church's hours are from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm on Wednesday and all day Sunday. All environmental concerns were addressed on the underlying plot plan (PP 9193) and mitigated by it's conditions of approval, There is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or which will be studied within a reasonable time, There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The project complies with all other applicable requires of etate law and local ordinances, ~UBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 675 Staff Report Page 4 CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan and Ordinance No. 348. 2. The proposed use is considered to be compatible with the existing uses due to the lack of overlap in the businesses and the church's hours of operation. 3. to a level of All environmental insignificance, concerns have been mitigated RFCOHMFNDATZONS: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 34142 based on the finding that the proposed use will not have a significant effect on the environment, and. APPROVAl of PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 675, based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval. LD:bc 3/26/90 I PU 675 I L AND USE VAC. VAC q~IND. SELF- I 1 .~OPPING CENTER ~ · YAC ~ VAC STA. VAC e VAC · \ · VAC App. CAVALRY CHAPEL ,OCAV~OnAL .AP ~lse CHURCH AFea TEMECULA Sup.Dist. 1 ST , Sec. 35 T.7S,R. 3W. Assessor's Bk. 921 Pg. 46 , ,~ Ckct~tion JEFFERSON AVE-- -MAJOR 100' . Elerrsnt ~STER RD.- - -MAJOR-- 100' . ,.~,... I---",""'~. Rd. Elk. Pg. 55C I:Mte O3/O3/9O l:)rawn By RG./I~./,1Ee ~ 1'- 2od RNERSIDE CCX~TY PLANNING DEPARTMENT uo sc, te EXISTING ZONING J 3 TEMECULA Sec, 35 T.7S.,R. 3W. C, ircu~ JEFFERSON AVE ..... MAJOR - --100' ~t WINCHESTER RD.- .... MAJOR .....100' Rd, Bk. I:q;i.55C Dtte O3,/03/9O Drawn By RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTME~ l~llS'J0r'S Ek Sup.Dist. I ST 921 Pg. 48 LOCIITIO NAL NAP NO ICa L E 2od m "'1 CHURCH CAVALRY CHAPEL | PU 675 C S.W.A.!'. COMMERCIAL f ENERAL LIGHT INI~ LI App. CAVALRY CHAPEL LOCaTIONAL MAI~ ! UseCHURCH ., Area TEMECULA Sup.Dist. IST * Sec, 35 T, TS,R, 3W, Isnssor*s Bk, 921 lug, 48 ~ (D Circulation JEFFERSON AVE - *-MAJOR -- 100' , , ~ Element WINCHESTER RD.* ..... MAJOR .... 100' ,,~ k--~"' , Rcl. Bk. R3.55C DateO3/O3/9ODrawrt By RG. i'fEIUzr. Z~ . ,r. * I 1'- 200' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,,o SC,~LE RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTNENT CONDZTZONS OF APPROVAL Don Coop - Calvary Chapel 28000 Front Street Temecula, CA 92390 PUBLZC USE PERNZT NO. 675 Pro3ect Doscrtptton: Church Assessor's Parcel No,: 921-480-023 Area: Temecula The use hereby permitted ts for a church Including assembly area, office, and concurrent childcare area located wtthtn Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 921-480-023. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of RIverside, tts agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside or tts agents, officers, or employees to attack, set astde, votd, or annul, an approval of the County of Riverside, tts advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning PUBLZC USE PERMZT NO. 675. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the permittee of any such clatm, actton, or proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully tn the defense. Zf the County fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or falls to cooperate fully tn the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever, By use is meant thebeginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhtblt A, or as amended by these conditions. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one (1) year or Bore, thts approval shall become null and void. Any outstde lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine dtrectly upon adjoining property or publtc rights-of-way. The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outltned tn the County Road Department transmittel dated 10-12-89, a copy of whtch ts attached. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be Installed in accordance wtth the provisions set forth in the RIverside County Health Department transetttal dated 10-10-89, a copy of whtch ts attached. Flood protection shall be provtded in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District transmittal dated 9-12-89, a copy of which is attached, PUBLZC USE PERNZT I0. 675 Conditions of Approval Page 2 11. 12. 13. 14, 15. 16, Ftre protection shall be provtded tn accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmtttal dated 8-23-89, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recuenendatlons set forth in the Department of Butldtng and Safety Land Use Section transmtttal dated 10- 2-89, a copy of which ts attached. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with Plot Plan No. 9193 approved landscape, irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler ~ystem shall be Installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable grouch condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be pemltted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches. A minimum of 94 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 and wtth the Special Parking Review contained wtthin the staff report for Public Use Permit No. 675. A minimum of three (3) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibtt A. Each parktrig space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently afftxed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the Znternational Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square tnches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum hetght of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parktng space lintshed grade, or centered at a mtntmum hetght of 36 inches from the parking space ftntshed grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted tn a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parktn9 facility, not less than 17 tnches by 22 clearly and conspicuously states the following: "Unauthorized vehtcles not displaying distinguishing placards or ltcense plates issued for physically handicappedpersons may beto~ed away at ovner's expense. Toyed vehtcles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning " In addttlon to the above requirements, the surface of each parktng place shall have a surface Identification stgn duplicating the symbol of accessibility tn blue patnt of at least 3 square feet tn stze. Prtor to the tssuance of occupancypermtts the follovtng additional and/or revtsed plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval: Stgntng Program Floorplans shall be tn substantial conromance with that shown on Exhibit B. PUBLIC USE PERNIT NO. 675 Conditions of Approval Page 3 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a mintmum height of six (6) feet at maturity. Landscaping plans shall Incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and within the parking areas. All landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed In accordance with approved plans prior to the tssuance of occupancy permits. Public Use Permit No. 675 permits a church assembly area, and associated offices and concurrent childcare area. No day school or daycare are permitted. Public Use Permit No. 675 is permitted for the following hours of operation: 7 p.m.- 9 p.m. Wednesdays and all day on Sundays. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. This permit shall become null and void after 4-18-95. (Added at Planning Commission 4-18-90). LD:bc,19g 3/27/90 4/19/90 OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR LzRoy Do Smoot ROAD~&CDUNTYSURVCYOR October 12, 1989 couN'r'Y ADMIN~'TRAT/W. ~ e ADOP,,CSS: P.O. BOx 1090 IUVER.SlDL CAMTOP,.N~ 92502 (714) 787.6554 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Re s PU 675 Team 1 - SMD #9 Parcel 17 of TR 16178 AP #111-111-111-9 Ladies and Gentlemen= With respect referenced item, recommendations: to the conditions of the Road DeparUnent approval for the above has the following Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at no cost to any government agency: No additional right of way shall be required on Enterprise Circle West since adequate right of way exists. Traffic signal mitigation for this project has been met by TR 16178. Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall construct ~he following at no cost to any government agency: Enterprise Circle West shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot par~width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (34'/45') Asphalt emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon par square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. COUNTY ADN[NLSTRATIVE CENFER" 4080 lEMON STREEt" RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 'PU 675 October 12, 1989 -Page 2 10. 11. 11a. 3. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for main- tenance by County. Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section 11.1. All work done within County right of way shall have an encroachment permit. All driveways shall conform to the .applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. All entrance driveways shall be channelized with concrete curb and gutter to prevent 'back-on" parking and interior drives from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum distance of 35 feet measured from face of curb. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with MB 160/102-104, PP 9193 and any related improvement plans. The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient public offsite rights of way to provide for primary/ secondary access road(s) to a paved and maintained road. Said access road(s) shall be constructed in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B. (32'/60') at a grade and alignment approved by tba Road Cog~nissioner. Said offsite access road shall be the northwesterly extension of Enterprise Circle West to the paved County maintained portion of Enterprise Circle West or as approved by the 9~ad Commissioner. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall comply with Road Department standards and require approval by the Road Co~nissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet .'PU G75 October 12, 1989 . Page 3 14. format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted with the street improvement plans and shall depict only such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are robeplaced within the public read rights-of-way. Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordationmake application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. Ve truly o , it Supe~isor LJtJw County of Riverside 'O: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. FROM: ~NEZ. "~WZR~~NTAL PUBLIC USE PERHIT 675~ DATE: August 10. 1989 H~1'%I SPEC~IST IV Enviromnental Health Services has reviewed the above plot plan and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. Prior to any building plan submittals, will-serve letters from the water and sewsring agencies will be required. SM:tac GEN. FORM 4, (Hey. 8/87) KENNETH L EDWARDS CHIEF ENGINEER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 1995 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 1033 TELEPHONE (714) 787-2015 FAX NO. (714) 788-9965 September 12, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. 1 Laurie Dobson Ladies and Gentlemen Re: Public Use Permit 675 This is a proposal to establish a church in an industrial shell building in the Temecula area. The .53 acre site is located on Enterprise Circle West about 150 feet southeasterly of Commerce Center Drive. The church is proposed in a building reviewed by the District under Plot Plan 9193. The building was floodproofed in accordance with the flood plain information available when the plot plan was reviewed. Area drainage plan fees have already been paid on this property as part of the underlying Plot Plan 9193- The District does not object to the proposed use. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Kris Flanigan of this office at 714/787-2333. c: Markham and Associates cry truly yours, HN H. KASHUBA 'or Civil Engineer KF:slw RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF 8-23-89 PLANNING & ENGINEERING 46-209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405 INDICX CA 92201 (619) 342-8886 PLANNING & ENGINEERING 3760 12TH STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501 (714) 787-6606 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: LAURIE DOBSON RE: PUBLIC USE 675 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. 2. The existing water mains and fire hydrants will provide sufficient fire protection for the proposed project. 3. Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code, Section 503. 4. Comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code. 5. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 6. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of 25¢ per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to install a fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. 10. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and Safety. KE: PU 675 Page 2 All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist ml October 2, 1989 Administrative Center, 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Planning Department Attention: Laurie Dobson County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA g2501 RE: Public Use Permit 675, Exhibit A Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site signage will be required. The site is located in a special studies zone. Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance is required from the following: ° Temecula Valley Unified School District If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review. Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning Department must be attached. Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval. Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 Planning Department PU 675 October 2, 1989 Page 2 Tennent Improvement plans required for plan check prior to issuance of building permits. Very truly yours, Robert Linares Senior Land Use Technician /sn County of Riverside RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. ~._.~T~? 14m~e [~bson a.. PUBLIC USE PERNIT 675 RE: DATE: August 10. 1989 HEALTH SPECIALIST IV Environmental Health Services has revieved the above plot plan and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and rarer services are available in this area. Prior to any buildinS plan submittals, rill-serve letters from the vater and severing agencies will be required. SM:tac ,,~LA!,:;-';N~ DEP&=' :' GEN, FORM 4. (Ray. S/871 Addendure. Thts form ts complementary to the appl(catton for land use and development. Request for Sbecial Review of Park~nq Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, Parking and Landscaping Suppleqent The current parking and landscaping ordinance offers alternative program for parking, parking reductions and bicycle parking exemptions. The follo~ng tnfomatton ts necessary to datemine reductions and/or exemptions. A. Please ~ndtcate the type of use: Church - Assembly Hall 1. Number of required regular car parking spaces 92 '2. Number of compact car spaces 3. Total parking spaces required 2 94 Check where appropriate: No. of Roms 13 1BR No. of Rooms 13 2BR No. of Rooms 13 3BR B. Alternative Program for Parking. Private van pool/car operations: Monetary incentive or flexible working hours to promote van pool/car operation. Yes No Number of parking spaces after 23 reduction tn required parking spaces Pass transtt Yes No Ind~cate distance of~roJect"~iTh respect to mass transtt entry ray or bus stop Number of parking spaces after 23 reduction tn requtred parking e Btc3~cle Parktng Number of required bicycle parking spaces Number of proposed bicycle parking spaces · Number of requtred parking spaces after 2Z reductton ~n requtred parking Total reduction tn parking spaces deducted from, item 1, 2 and 3 C. Planned Residential Development for Senior Citizens. A proposal for planned residential develoment for senior citizens my have a 20 percent reduction in parking; as specified in Section Z8,6 of Ordinance No, 348, An additional five percent reduction in parking spaces is allowed if the applicant proposes alternative senior citizen transportation programs; however, in no Case will the reduction of parking spaces exceed 25S of the total spaces required by Section t8,t2 of this ordinance. Describe the alternative program as indicated on item B.2. of this form. 2. Number of required parking spaces 3. Number of proposed parking spaces D. Bicycle parking exemption. 1. Type of use. 2. Purpose of request. Describe reasons for requesting bicycle parking exemption. Exemptions from bicycle parking may be granted depending upon the location of the site with respect to the urban area, the nature and hours of the operation of the proposed use, the accessibility of the site by bicycle at present and in the future. 3. Description of proposal. Shared Parking Requirement. 1. Describe the type and number of daytime uses. letters Number of required parking spaces Number of proposed parking spaces See attached 2. Describe the type and number of nighttime uses: None . Number of required parking spaces Number of proposed parking spaces State the distance between the proposed use and the off-street parking facility. (The project should be located le~s~ha~50 feet from the off-street parking facility.) e State and explain reasons demonstrating that there ts no substantial conflict tn the principal hours or periods of peak demand of the structures or uses for ~htch the ;}otnt use is proposed to exist, ChUrch meeting schedule is only on Wednesday eveninqs after 7:00 ~na .~.na~y.~. ~aj~t h,~4~~ ~e na~ ooen d,~r~ng these times. Describe and submit floor plans that shows that the floor area devoted to customer and employee use ts less than typical for the size of the building proposed, Submit to the Planning Department a copy of the Legal Instrument of Agreement between the parties involved in the ~oint or shared use of the off-street parking facility. In addition submit one copy o[ the Legal Instrument of Agreement to the County Recorder's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. F. Nodtfication to the drculatton, landscaping and parking layout. The Planning'Otrectormay.pemtt modifications without notice of hearing to the circulation, landscaping and parking layout where topographic or other physical conditions make it impractical to require strict compliance ~th these requirements. Please indicate belo~ which are the toDographic or physical conditions that hinder the develoixnent of your pro~ect. .. RANPAC ~NGIN!~G COtI~ORAT1ON August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Norm Thomas Di~cto~ of Public Works 734 676-?000 27447 Enterprise Circle West Temecula, CA 92390 USA FAX 714 676-8527 To Whom It May Concern: located in Commerce Park. My address is __ and my busi~ <ss hours are Rz r ~arking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel t~r the purpose of a Church al?. day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wedne!~day. Enclosed is my business card. Sincere~?~ August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: located in Co=erce Park. My address is 2?qe~ and my business hours are I authorize my / ? parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel f~,r the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wedn.-~sday. Enclosed is my business card. Sincerely, TONY FALCO (714) 676-4257 (619) 941-1838 CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANING 27499 Commerce Center Dr. Sure B Rancho Celifomi~, 92390 August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of S~4,-;; located in Commerce Park. My address ~s and my bus~ness hours are ~'~'//~.-/~/' I authorize my /-? parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel for the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wednesday. Enclosed is my business card. Sincerely, August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of ~ ~WL~~ 'Yt.~,~t~ ~C~k,) located in Com~e:¢e ~ark. M~ addres~ is j~'Y~ ~?>/~',U' ~][~{ ~jv%t I authorize my /~ parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel for the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wednesday. Enclosed is my business card. Sincerely, August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: located in Commerce Park My address is and my busi::ess h s )- I author.i~;v.. my J parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel fa=' the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM We~t:...-.sday. Enclosed Ks my business card. Sincerely, ~ ~ (7~4) 53~-333~ R.W.L. CONSTRUCTION · [NERAL CONTRACTOI~ Lic. No. 314116 RUSS LUCIER 14322 Harrington St. Garden Grove, Ca. 92643 August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of located in Commerce Park. RIDER WAY, TEMECULA 7:00 - 4:00 RWT. CONSTRUCTION My address is __ 41745 and my busiz,~ss hours are I authorize my 14 parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel for the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wednc~sday. Enclosed is my business Sincerely, card. Temeeula Shaping Consultant 45150 VIA VAQUERO ROAD TEMECULA, CA 92390 (714) 676-3301 JENNEAN COOP (714) 676-3301 August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of Temeoula StlD~iDg Onn~ult~nt~ located in Commerce Park. My address is __ 41765 Rider Way, Temecula and my business hours are 8:00 - 5:00 I authorize my 13 parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel foE' the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wedne~]ay. Enclosed is my business card. Sincerely, August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of ~Qu5 ~O~l~D~ _ O~C~'~ located in Commerce ~a~. My a~dress is _~193~ ~e~ b~ ~ ~ ~,' ~'~,'~, and my business hours are ~'.~o-S~3D ~h-[,:. ~3~ ~o ~% I authorize my ~G)~ parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel for the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wedne$~day. Enclosed is my business card. Sincerely, :EEN Joe Kr DkJe August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of located in Commerce Park- W. EnterDrise Cr. 8-5 Mon-Fri Magewind.~rts My address is __ 27488 and my business hours are I authorize my 6 parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel for the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wednesday. Enclosed is my business card. September 25, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department 9th Floor 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92507 Attention: Kim Jerroll-Johnson Regarding: PUP 675 Proposed Church and Sunday School Parking Requirements Mrs. Johnson: In reference to the above referenced public use permit the planning department is requiring 1 parking space per 35 square feet of assembly area. This totals 94 parking spaces. The existing shell building only has 24 parking spaces alloted to it. The Church and Sunday School's hours of 7-9pm Wednesday and 9-12am Sunday do not coincide with the operating hours of a typical business. We are asking for the Planning Department's consideration so that we may use the parking spaces of adjacent buildings to satisfy the parking requirement. Businesses that have already signed leases in the center have included letters supporting this proposition. In addition, we have included a letter from the owner of the project stating he has no objections. In addition, he will notify future leasees of this arrangement. Please direct any questions to this office. Pastor Gary Nelson · (714) 244-6378 27575 Commerce Center Drive · Temecula. California 92390 · (714) 699-0553 Raneho .lass & S reen Table Tops · Etchel & Beveled Glass · Ernergen~ Board-up Service · CHRIS DODD (714) 699-6604 2?495 Commerce Center Dr., Unit B. Temecula. CA 92390 August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: .C ~~k. address is )7~f5'/~-~'Z-~-~ .located in ommerce ar My __ ~F~ j'.Zo~/~./4~. I authorize my F parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel for the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wednesday. Enclosed is Sincerely, my busin ss card. DONALD W. COOP September 26, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department 9th Floor 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, Ca 92507 RE: Calvary Church Parking Dear Mrs. Johnson, I am the owner of adjoining buildings in Commerce Park in Rancho California. These buildings have a total of 158 parking places. I am enclosing reciprocal agreements from my present tenants which when combined with the Calvary Chapel assigned places represent a total of 123 places. I will also make all future tenants aware of these agreements and secure their concurrance as the buildings are leased. We respectfully ask your favorable consideration of the Calvary Chapel PUP Request. DWC:sb Enclosures (714) 676-3301 · P,O. Box 1234 · Temecula. CA 92390 August 28, 1989 County of Riverside Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Whom It May Concern: located in Commerce k. My address __<' 6~O,~w,{(c~_ A~-- F - I authorize my ~ parking spaces to be used by Calvary Chapel for the purpose of a Church all day Sunday and 7-9 PM Wednesday. Enclosed is my business card. Sincerely, :liVE:BiDE COIJnCt.. " PL, nnin6 DEPA:tClTIEnC APPLICA WON FOR LAND UIE AND DEVELOPMENT D CHANGE OF ZONE NO. D CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. D PARCEL MAP NO. D PLOT PLAN NO. DATE: )i~PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. D TRACT MAP NO. [:) TEMPORARY USE PERMIT NO. D VARIANCE NO. INCOMPLETE APPUCATIONS WILl, NOT BE ACCEFTED. A APPUCANT INFORMATION 1. Apl:dicant's Name: MIlling Address: ~ ""' TeM~x~ Nc~: ( 7/",/ 2, Ownef's Name: Mailing Acidtess: Telephcme No.: ( ~ 3. Repmtentative: Z ~ r/ Mailing Address: Te~phoneNo.: ( RIVF,~,,... ~ ,. .....~l Y PLANNIN8 DEP~,~TMENT (8 &~ - 5 I~m.) ~-,/'/--- ~--- A, - . s',~, 'z-/'7'C-,-,,,_-Z ~ (, ?~'- (" ~7 Z- (a&m.-51:xm.) NOTE: If more than one person is involved in the ownership of the ;:x'Opefl'y being developed 8 leDPrate page must be attached to this Ipplrjtion which lists the names and Iddrelles Of ill persons having an interest in the Ownership Of the Ixoperty. B. IqqOJECT INFORMATION 1. Purpose of Request (describe project): (Ordinance 348 ref. no.) 2. Fielltecl GIles filed in conjunctio~ with thai flcluest: leROPERTY INFORMATION Aleesso~shrce|No(s). '7 7-/' IZ'ez:> ' o L General location (stTeet address, etc.) /~, '/c/,' ,5.: E'.- 15 e. nge ~Ld 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 REQUIRED PROPERTY DWNERI NOTIFICATION INFORMATION APPLICATIONS FOR: PARCEL MAPS TRACTS ZONE CHANGES CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PUBLIC USE PERMITS WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM 18,30 PLOT PLANS RmauirinG Environ,mental Alsessments (Muitifamity,Commercaal, Indultr:al ) VARIANCES TEMPORARY USE PERMITS The following Ittrrm will be required It the te~e of filing of the eb(wl riolid Clle IpplQtion$: 1. TWO identical Nickages to be inserted in eeNirlte 9Ya" X 12Ya" marfile envelopes .These envelopes shaft indicate the case number and the word ~ebels,"end Shill contain the following: I. One typed let of gummed labels indicating Ill the m owners 'nlmes end the fNliling 8ddrelses ·hit are within · 3004OOt radius of the ixqeriof of thek pe'OpOl4~ I:woject (thl lilt Ihall be Iscertlmed from the last equalized esNlsment roll,) b. A phOtOCOpy of the aforementioned its. c. One label for the Ip~iCant/engineer. Onellbelfo~theovmer. FOR LAND DWISION CASES ONLY: An 8Ya' X 11 ~ reduction of the tent·we maD. 2. F~urtyped~etsofgummedlabe~softhe~ph~nt~w~er~e~gineer~ndreprelentm~vewiththeirm~i~ing~ddresses.D~t include cluplicale sets wt~efe applicant end owner ,etC. ere the MN .Thele ShOuld be inserted in I letter.sized envelope and Itlpled to the ou/l~de of o~e of the large manila envelopes mentioned in Hem 1 above. 3. Ce1i~r~ati~bythetitlac~mp~ny~engineer~r~unrey~rth~tthe~b~ve~latisc~mp~e~e~nd~ccuf~te.TheT~xA~ess~r~ff~ce will not prebere or certify the property oemer list (lee certificltion foeTn below). 4. ~c~py~fy~urexhibit~rtent~tivem~how~bercelaw~thin3~feet.~nthema~p~nttheri~mes~·~pr~;erty~wners wdhin 300feet Is they ire filth On the gummed labels. The above note infommtion my be obtained by contacting · title inlumnce company m the RwereiCle County area PROPERTY OWNERI CERI'IFICA I'ION i, ,mify that on __.. (her NaN) the atl·ched p~operty owners list wet prepared by .. _ puftulnt to application requirements furnilhed by the Rivertide Courtty PIInning Department, hid tim is · complete and true compilation of owner of the eubiect property and all other prOpeRty om~mm wtthin 300 feet of the property involved in the · ion and is besed uPon the latest 14;luelized asaelsment folis, I fullher cartif¥ thlt the tnforffmtion fHecl is true Ind cofflCt to the belt of my knowledge; I uncle·rind that inconect or erroneous info~'matlon my be ~ for ·ejeCtion or denial of the N3¢dicatiorL NAME: ITTLEIREGIGTRATION: N)DRESS: PHONE: 6tGNATURE: DATE: .18am.-6nm,I DON COOP P.O. BOX 1234 TEMECULA, CA 92390 (714) 676-3301 July 27. 1989 Re: Calvery Chapel of Rancho California To Whom It May Concern: Don Coop, as owner, give Markham & Associates permission to process. file. and sign documents pertaining to the subject site. If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT COUNTY ADf4INISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH FLOOR 4080 LEHON STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA g2501-3657 Joseph A. Richards, Planning Director A FUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COleMISSION to consider the application{s) described below. The Planning Department has tentatively found that the proposed project{s) will have no significant environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration{s}. The Planning Canmission will consider whether or not to adopt the negative declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing. Place of Hearing: Board Roam, 14th Floor, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA Date of Hearing: WEDNESDAYm APRIL 18, 1990 The time of hearing is indicated with each application listed below. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Department before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Canmission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The environmental finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter Monday through Friday fran g:O0 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. PUBLIC USE PERMIT 675, EA 34142, is an application submitted by Calvary Chapel for property located in the Temecula Area and First Supervisorial District and generally described as SE of Rider Way, NE of Enterprise Circle West and made pursuant to Ordinance No. 348, Riverside County Land Use Ordinance which proposes to permit a church in an existing industrial shell building (in City of Temecula). (LD) TIHE OF HEARING: 9:30 A.M. ~Rod~n, Robert C/O Roden Props 225 E. 3rd Ave. Escondido, CA. 92025 921480005 Howard Omdahl 801 Shadetree Lane Fallbrook, CA. 921480006 Maurbern Systems, Inc. 4532 Costa De Oro Avenue Oxnard, CA. 921480009 Ranpac Engineering Corp. 27447 Enterprise Circle Temecula, CA. 92390 921480010 Riutcel, James A. P.O. Box 209 Bonso11, CA. 92003 921480011 Churchill Commercial P.O. Box 17899 Irvine, CA. 92713 921480012 ChurchillCommercial Broker P.O. Box 17899 Irvine, CA. 92713 921480013 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jeffezson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480020 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480021 -i- Bancon xea~y ~'uno ~ '27720 0efferson Avenue Temecula, CAo 92390 921480022 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480024 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480025 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480026 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480027 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480028 Kruis, Robert G. Rancon Realty Fund I 2140 Green Canyon Rd. Temecula, CA. 92390 921480029 Rancon Realty Fund I 27720 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA. 92390 921480030 McMillin, Donald L. 1561 W. Chanticleer Anaheim, CA. 92803 921480031 Riverside County Flood P,O. Box 1033 Riverside, CA. 92502 909120016 :iiVE:DiDE cotlncY PLAnnin6 DEPaRCntEn; EN~O~ENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: STANDARD EVALUATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E,A.) NUMBER: , ~///////2.. MODULE NUMBER(s): PROJECT CASE TYPE(s)AND NUMBERS(S): NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E.A.: //q I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. DESCRIPTION (include proposed iminlmum,lot size and as applicabl ): B, TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s): D. EXISTING ZONING: E. PROPOSED ZgNING: F. STREET REFERENCES: //f° ,~j/~ IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? ~"*~ IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? G. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR .ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: -7:T.. II. COMPREHENSNE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION Check the mpproprtate option(s) below and proceed lccordingly. ~] All or pad of the project life is in "Adopted Specffic Plans," "REMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community POlicy Are". Complete Sectior~ III, N (B and C only), V and VI. ~1 or pad of the project Bite is in "Areas Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV (A, B and D only), V and Vi. All or part of the project site has an Open Space and Conservation designation other than those mentioned Ibove. Complete Sections III, IV (A, B, and E only), V and VI. IIII. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Indicate the nature of the proposed land use as determined from the descriptions as found in Comprehensive General Ran Figure VL3 (Circle One). This information is necessary to determine the Ippropriate land use suitability ratings in Section III.B. NA - Not Applicable Critical Essential Ho...I~ !ligh Risk Normal-Low Risk Indicate with a yes (Y) {x no (N) ~vhether any environmental bs-srd end/or resource issues may algnirt,,arttly affect Or be affected by the prOpONII. All reference~ figures ere contained in the Ci~ General Bin. For any issue marked yes (Y) write le:lclitior~l data sources, 8gencies ¢or~jlted, findings of fact end any mitigation measures urlder Section V. Allo, where indicated, Circle the appropriate land use suitability or noise 8oceptability ~8). (See definitions at bottom of this page). HAZARDS Alc uist-Prioio Special Studies or County Fault .,, , [ uefaction Potential Zone (Fig. VIA ) S PS U R (Fig. VI.4) (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps) landslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Seismic Maps or On-site Inspection) NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6) Rockfall Hazard (On-site Inspection) Expansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soil Surveys) Erosion (U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soil Surveys) Wind Ersosion & Blowsand (Fig. VI.1, Ord. 460, Sac. 14.2 & Ord. 484) Dam Inundation Area (Fig. VI.7) plalns (Fig. VI.7) U R (Fig. VI.8) 12. ~ Airport Noise (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11 .12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.B) ..~ ~IA A B C D (Fig, VI. 11 ) 13. 'lroad Noise (Fig. VI.13 - VI.16) ~, A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) 14. way Noise (Fig. VI,17 - VI.29) A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) e A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) ' t Generated Noise Affecting ;;: ..~ Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. VI.11) Noise Sensitive Project (Fig. VIA 1 ) Air Quality Impacts From Project 19. ~ Pr6ject Sensitive to Air Quality 20..~. Water Quality Impacts From Project 21..~. Project Sensitive to Water Quality ~23: ~ Hazardous Materials and Wastes Hazardous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - VI.31 ) 24. Other 25. Other 27,_1~ In or Near an Agricultural Preserve RESOURCES (Riv. Co. Agricultural Lind Converaltion Contract Maps) Wildlife (Fig. V1.36 - VI.37) Vegetatio, (Fig. Vl.38 - Vl.40) Mineral Resources (Fig. VI.41 - VI.42) Energy Resources (Fig. VI.43 - VI.44) Scenic Highways (Fig. VI.45) 33 k Historic Resources (Fig. VL32 - VI.33) 34-1L Archaeological Resources 35/~J (Fig. %/I.32 - VL33 & %/1.46 - VI.48) . , Psleontological Resources (Psleontoiogic, al Resources Map) 36,..__~ Other 37,.,,."' Other Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable U - Generally Urtmjitable R - Restricted A - Generally Acceptable B - Conditionally Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable D - Lind Use Discouraged 3e5-7o INew 12/S7~ 2 LAND USE DETERMINATION Complete this part unless the project is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", "REMAP' or "Rancho Villages Community Policy Areas." 1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s): Ud D USE PLaNNiNG ,t,4 3. SUBAREA, ANY: "'{E4/HI/41/ 4. COMMUNITY POUCY AREA, IF ANY: '" SUMMARY OF POLICIES AFFECTING PROPOSAL: B, For all projects, inidcate with a yes p0 or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or services issues may significantly affect or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Ran. For any issue marked yes p0, write data sources, agencies Consulted, findings of fact, end mitigation measures under Section V. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 1..j~_ Circulation (Fig. IV.l-IV.11. Discuss in 10,.]~_ Sec. V Existing, Ranned & Recluired Roads) Bike Trails (Fig. IV.12 - IV. 13) Water (Agency Letters) Sewer (Agency Letters) Rre Services (Fig. IV.16 - N.18) Sherfff~ (Fig IV.17- N.18) Schod$ (Fig. W.17 - N.18) Solid Waste (Fig. N.17 - N.18) Perks and Recreation (Fig. IV.19 - N.20) 12,J~.. 13,_~ 14J~J. 17, Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV. 19 - IV.24/ Riv. Co. 800 Scale Eclue~trian Trail Ma,os) Utilities (Rg. N25 - IV.26) Libraries (Rg. IV.17 - IV. 18) Health Sen4ces(Rg. IV. 17 - N.18) Airports (Fq3. 11.18.2 - 11.18.4, 11.18.8 - 11.18.10 & N27 - N.36) Other Ce If Ill or part of the projed is located in "Adopted Specif'c Plans", 'REMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community Policy Areas", review in detail the KN~J~C policies applying to the propoe, el, end complete the following: 1. Slate the relevant land use designation(s): 2. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consistent with the policies end designations of the appropriate document, end therefore consistent with the Comprehensive C-erNgral Plan? ff not, explain: 295-/0New 12/87~ 3 LAND USE DETERMINATION (continued) If Idl or part of the project site is in "Areas not Designated as Open Space", mad is not in 8 Community Ran, complete Questions 1, 2, 3, 6 mad 7. Complete clue~tions 4, 5, 6 mad 7 if it is in a Community Plan. Current land use catsgory(ias) for the site based on existing conditions. (Le. residential, commercial, etc.) Also indicate land use type 3. if D.1 diffem fTom D.2, will the difference be fesotvecl at the development stage? Explain: { ~is the proposed project consistent with the policies mad designations of the Commun~ Ran? If not, explain: GBased on this initial study, is the proposal consistent with the Comprehensive General Ran? if not, reference by Section mad Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies: {~ · If 811 or part of the project site is in ma Open Space mad Conservation designation, complete the following: 1. State the designation(s): 2. Is the proposal consistent with the designation(s)? ff not, explain: 3. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consisent with the Comprehensive General Plan? ~ not, reference by Section mad Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies: V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES A. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: DATE DATE ADEQUACY SECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION DETB~MI~TI0~ ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED (YESIN0~ATE) For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and IV.B, identify the Section and issue number and do the following, in the format as shown below: 1. Uat 811 additional relevant data sources, including agencies consulted. 2. State all findings of fact regarding environmental concems. 3. State specific mitigation measures, if identifiable without requiring an environmental impact rel~ort (E.I.R.) 4. If additional information is required before the environmental 8sseasment can be completed, refer to Subsection A. 5. ff additional sheets are needed to complete this section, check the box at the end of the section and attach the necessary sheets. SECTION/ (New V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continue) SECTION/ ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES: See attached pages. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION: !~The project will not have 8 lignifr, ant effect on the environment and 8 Negative Declaration may be prepared. (or) The Ixoject could have 8 8ignificant effect on the environment; however, there will not be 8 significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in Section V have been applied to the project and a Negative Declaration may be prepared. (or) r'l The project may h~ve · ZZ/~the ertvironmant encl an Environmental Impact Report is recluired. Prepared by CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: MTG: DEPT: TITLE: 8/14/9,0 PREPARED BY: RABIES VACCINATION CLINIC AND DOG LICENSING PROGRAM HD DEPT AT~ CITY CITY MGR Joe Hreha, Manager of Information Systems RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENT: That the City of Temecula Cosponsor the Vaccination Clinic and Licensing Program Staff proposes that on August 25, 1990, the City of Temecula, Riverside County Animal Control, and Doctor Daniel Pearson, D.V.M, sponsor a Rabies Vaccination Clinic and Dog Licensing Program. The specifics are contained in the attached flyer that would be advertised in local papers during the week of August 19, 1990. This clinic and program also occurs during our Dog License Late Fee Amnesty Program that has been previously approved by the City Council at the July 24, 1990 City Council Meeting. The clinic is a requirement provided by the County of Riverside in support of the City of Temecula's total Animal Control Program. None Proposed Newspaper Advertisement FOR DOGS ONLY -Rabies Vaccination Clinic- Sponsored by The City of Temecula, Riverside County Animal Control Services, and Dr. Daniel Pearson, D.V.M. WHEN: TIME: COST: August 25, 1990 2:30 p.m. thru 4:30 p.m. 41002 County Center Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 County Administrative Complex - Parking lot area Vaccinations: $3. O0/each Licenses: City of Temecula and Riverside County Licenses will also be sold at the clinic Dog - City of Temecula Dog Licenses - 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year COST: Altered Dog Unaltered Dog Altered Dog Owned by Senior Citzen (60 years or older) $ 8.00 $12.00 $16.00 $16.00 $24.00 $32.00 $ 3. oo $ 5.00 $ 7. oo All dogs four months or older are required to be license& No late fees will be charged to Temecula residents in connection with the City of Temecula 90-day late fee amnesty program that expires on September 30, 1990. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB# TITLE: Copier Purchase MTG: 8-10-90 DEPT: C.M. CITY CITY MGR Prepared by Deputy City Clerk June Greek RECOMMENDATION: This report will be forwarded to you under separate cover. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: HTG: DEPT: 8/14/90 PLNG TITLE: R ecommen dati on: DEPT HD ':'~/.".r~ . TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067 CITY ATTY , CZTY Approval of Tentative Tract No, 21067 with an additional condition that the applicant shall provide a focused traffic study prior to occupancy. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Kingsway Construction ENGINEER: Musser Engineering Consultants PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a third extension of time to record the final map for Tract No. 21067, a 104 lot single family subdivision with 17.7 acres of open space along the northern side of the site for Temecula Creek. LOCAT ION: The northerly side of Pala Road south of State Route 79 and approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of Pala Road and State Route 79. EXISTING ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: R-R Rural Residential R-1 Single Family Residential R-R Rural Residential C-1/CP General Commercial PROPOSED ZONING: Not requested EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Vacant Single Family Residential Subdivision Horse Ranch Mini-storage Facility PROJECT STATISTICS: STA FFR PT\TT21067 Number of Acres: Number of Lots: Open Space: Proposed Density of Developed Portion of Site: 46 104 17.7 acres 3.7 dwelling units/acre BACKGROUND: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: Tentative Tract No. 21067 was submitted to the County in conjunction with Chan9e of Zone No. 4525, a request to change the zone of the subject property from R-R, Rural Residential, which has a minimum lot size of 1/2 acre, to R-l, Single Family Residential, which has a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet (0.17 acre). Tentative Tract No. 21067 and Change of Zone No. 4525 were approved by the Board of Supervisors on April 8, 1986. The first request for a one year extension of time for the tentative tract was approved by the County Planning Commission on May 11, 1988, and by the Board of Supervisors on June 7, 1988. The second request for an extension of time was submitted on March 20, 1989, and was approved by the County Plannin9 Commission on August 8, 1989. The third request for an extension of time was submitted to the County on February 21, 1990. The reason for the request is to allow time for review of the flood control and drainage plan by the Federal Emergency Management Agency before the deadline for recordation of the final map. On March 29, 1990, the County Plannin9 Commission tentatively approved the third extension of time and recommended that the City receive and file the notice of decision by the County Plannin9 Commission. The proposal is to subdivide a 46 acre site into 104 single family lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. 17.7 acres alon9 the northerly side of the site will be maintained a open space for Temecula Creek. The site is located in Flood Zone A. The applicant proposes to import 160,000 cubic yards of fill soil to elevate the building pads above the flood plain. The secondary access to the site will be provided by dedicatin9 "Temecula Lane" and providin9 improvements for "Temecula Lane" and Loma Linda Road. A traffic study was not prepared for this project at the time of its original approval in 1986. The Conditions of Approval from the County Road Department require the provision of an improved secondary access, payment of $150.00 per lot prior to final map recordation as mitigation for traffic signal impacts, and concrete curb and gutter improvements on Pala 2 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: FINDINGS: Road at a distance of 43 feet from the street centerline and 55 feet dedicated as half-width right-of-way. County Roads Department Condition of Approval No. 25 requires successful completion of proceedings for an assessment district for the construction of a four lane bridge on Pala Road at Temecula Creek. Assessment District 159 as established does not include fundin9 for improvements on Pala Road, the realignment of Pala Road, or the four lane bridge across Temecula Creek. The County Roads Department reports that 82% of the cost of the Pala Road and bridge improvements is available through federal bridge rehabilitation funding. The City will have to make provisions for the remainder of the cost of improvements· Tract No. 21067 will contribute a relatively small portion of the cumulative traffic impacts on Pala Road and State Route 79. The applicant is willing to contribute a fair share of the cost of street and bridge improvements· A traffic study will quantify the contribution of Tract No. 21067 to the traffic impacts on Pala Road and State Route 79 and indicate what the project's fair share should be. The proposed density of 3.7 units per acre is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan designation of 2-5 units per acre. All lots conform to the minimum lot width, depth, and area standards in the R-l, Single Family Residential. On May 8, 1986, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors adopted a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 20201 in conjunction with the approval of Change of Zone No. 4525 and Tentative Tract No. 21067. Tentative Tract No. 21067 is consistent with the R-l, Single Family Zone in that all lots meet the requirements for minimum lot area, width, and depth. Tentative Tract No. 21067 is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan designation of 2-5 dwelling units per acre in that the proposed density is 3.7 dwelling units per acre. 3 The project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment in that Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation fees are required and archaeological resources are not likely to be found at the site. The project will not be detrimental to human health or safety in that drainage and flood control measures must be approved by FEMA prior to map recordation, and the potential for liquefaction, differential subsidence, and surface fissuring at the site are very low. A soils report must be submitted to the Building and Safety Department addressing soil stability and geological conditions. Two means of ingress and egress will be fully constructed prior to occupancy. Street and intersection peak hour levels of service will be acceptable when the required street improvements are constructed. The site is suitable for the type and intensity of development proposed in that drainage and flooding problems will be mitigated, the potential for differential subsidence and surface fissuring is low, and the tentative map is in conformance with all applicable requirements regarding lot area and dimensions, density, and street and subdivision design standards. The project will not have an adverse impact on adjacent properties in that all lots will drain toward streets within the subject property or into drainage facilities as approved by the City Engineer. Tentative Tract No. 21067 is consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act regarding passive use of solar energy in that the proposed lots have significant southern exposure which allows for passive heating opportunities. 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: Approve a Third Extension of Time for Tentative Tract No. 21067 based on the analysis and findings contained in this report and subject to the original Conditions of Approval with the following exception: The County Roads Department's Condition of Approval No. 25 shall be replaced with the following Condition: The applicant shall submit a Focused Traffic Study addressing the project's impacts on the existing alignment of Pala Road and the existing intersection of Pala Road and State Route 79. The study shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineers prior to occupancy of the first unit. The study will determine a reasonable "fair share" cost to be paid by the developer toward a new bridge. If a fair and equitable share of the developer's cost of transportation improvements has not been determined at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is needed, the developer shall be required to deposit $10,000 into a City established Road Benefit Fund. The developer is also required to sign an agreement with the City to either pay an amount or receive a refund equal to the difference between his estimated fair share and the amount of deposit with the City. SW: ks Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 - Tract Map County Staff Report Conditions of Approval 5 3..Z/$' .011 '.LI=I~I' 'dlt V"lVd u~.lolnoJ!3 --.c::r SI '8,d 9Z6'qg s.,,msteW 'MZ'It"S 8 '.L 61'oeS I ';sla 'dnS OGZt, "TI:::) '0tt DeTI I-tt O.L lt-tt NOI.L::}nI=I.LSNO3 A.llSONIX 'dd-f ZgOIZ '0N .L:)¥1IJ,3AI.LVlN3J, .. U3~JIalON3 ~m3dO'13'^3Cl' 4|HSW3NAmmO S~OAt)ILNO~) ANV311ddl U3N/A0 . * ~';'.' =: ::::~,:: . · ONIN0Z NVld 1VI~3N3~) / / dl~ NOIAV3Ol /. : ~ 'H" .' t~ION]~IV Z90 I~ '0N Notice of Public Hearinl~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92390 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No: Tentative Tract 21067, revised Applicant: I(ing.gway Cottstruction Location: The northerly side of Pala Road, south of Highway 79, and approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of Pala Road and Highway 79. Proposal: A third extension of time for a 104 lot single family subdivision with 17.7 acres of open space along the northern side of the site for Temecula Creek. Environmental Action: Previous Environmental Determination Negative Declaration. Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing(s) or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public heating(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula City Hall, 43180 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Scott Wright, City of Temecula Planning Department (714) 694-6400 PLACE OF HEARING DATE OF HEARING TIME OF HEARING: Temecula Community Center 28816 Pujol Street Temecula Tuesday. August 14. 1990 7:00 PM APPROVEI) BY BOAM3 OF SUPERVI APRIL 8 Zoning Dlstr~c~:98~ancho California Supervisorial District: First E.A. Number: 20210 Regional Team No.: II TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067, Amd. No. 3 CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 4525 Planning Con~nission: 2-5-86 Agenda Item Nos.: 27 & 27a RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 1. Applicant: 2. Engineer: 3. Type of Request: 4. Location: 5. Existing Zoning: 6. Surrounding Zoning: 7. Site Characteristics: 8. Area Characteristics: 9. Comprehensive General Plan Elements: 10. Land Division Data: 11. Agency Recommendations: 12. Letters: 13. School District: 14. a. Impacted? b. School Agreement received? Sphere of Influence: Kingsway Construction Corporation McCutchan Company, Inc. Zone change from R-R to R-l; to divide 46 acres into 118 lots Easterly of Jedediah Smith Road and Southerly of State Highway 79 R-R R-R, R-l, C-1/C-P Flat open pasture, subject to flooding Rural area transitioning to urban LAND USE: Category II DENSITY: 2-8 du/acre OPEN SPACE/CONS: Not designated as Open Space TOTAL ACREAGE: 46 Acres TOTAL LOTS: 118 DU PER ACRE: 3.9 PROPOSED MIN. LOT SIZE: 7200 square feet ROAD: See letter dated 11-27-85 HEALTH: See letter dated 11-25-85 FLOOD: See letter dated 12-24-85 FIRE: See letter dated 12-2-85 WATER: See letter dated 9-23-85 Opposing/Supporting: None as of this writing Elsinore Union High School District and Temecula Union School District Yes Yes ~// No None ANALYSIS: Project Description: Change of Zone Case No. 4525 and Tentative Tract No. 21067, Amended No. 3 is an application to change the zoning of the project site from R-R to R-1 and to divide 46 acres into 118 lots. The subject property is located on the north side of Pala Road and east of Jedediah Smith Road. At present, the subject property contains a stable and mobile home. Surrounding land uses are a TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067, Amd. No. 3 CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 4525 Staff Report Page 2 storage facility, horse ranch, vacant lot, and a single family subdivision, under construction. The site is currently zoned R-R, and surrounding zoning is R-R, R-l, and C-1/C-P. Environmental Analysis: Environmental Assessment No. 20210 indicates that the subject site is impacted by Liquifaction hazard, 100 year floodplain, dam inundation area, and Agricultural and Wildlife Resources. A liquifaction report has been submitted, and reviewed by the County Geologist. He has prepared a letter of Conditional approval dated December 12, 1985. Flooding concerns have been mitigated through tract design and the Flood Control District letter dated December 24, 1985. The agricultural and wildlife potential for the site are non-existent due to commercial and residential development in the surrounding area. Project Consistency and Compatibility: The subject property lies within the Rancho California/Temecula subarea of the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area. The Comprehensive General Plan's Open Space and Conservation Element shows this site in Areas Not Designated as Open Space. Review of the policies of the Land Use Element in the Comprehensive General Plan indicate that the subject site and proposed project fit the requirements of Category II at this time. A full range of public services and facilities are available to the site. The developer is proposing a density of 3.9 dwellings per acre. The proposed 118 lot subdivision is a logical extension of the existing urban pattern. Staff recommends approval of Change of Zone Case No. 4525 and Tentative Tract No. 21067, Amended No. 3, in that the proposal is consistent with the General Plan, compatible with area development, and conforms to the requirements of Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460. Findings: The applicant proposes to change the zoning of 46 acres from R-R to R-l, and to subdivide the site into 118 single family residential lots. The subject property contains a mobile home and a stable. Surrounding land uses are: a residential subdivision, vacant lots, horse ranch, and a storage facility. 3. Surrounding zoning is R-R, R-l, C-1/C-P. 4. The General Plan policies call for Category II land use. 5. Liquifaction and flooding impact the project site. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067, Amd. No. 3 CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 4525 Staff Report Page 3 Conclusions: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan 2. The proposed project is compatible with area development. 3. The proposed project conforms to all applicable County Ordinances. 4. Liquifaction and flooding concerns can be effectively mitigated. Recommendations: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for E.A. No. 20201, based on the conclusion that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and, APPROVAL of Change of Zone Case No. 4525 from R-R to R-l; and APPROVAL of Tentative Tract No. 21067, Amended No. 3, subject to the conditions of approval, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Staff report. DM:dw 01-1..v ,,,,,, ,.i · , ' :. , ~. ., · ,d.9013 'ON .L jJ. 2AIJ. VJ N:3J. ' ' , ' APPRDVED BY BOARD OF SUPERVI APRIL 8, 1986 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067 DATE APRIL-8,' 1988 AMENDED NO. 3 STANDARD CONDITIONS The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Riverside County Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. e A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained road right of way. If grading is proposed on slopes of 10% or greater, an environmental assessment approval will be required from the Planning Department prior to an acceptance of the plans by the Building Department. One mylar copy of the approved grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for transmittal to the Road Department. 7. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated November 27, 1985, a copy of which is attached. g. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067 Conditions of Approval Page 2 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the pu61ic and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Con~nissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and con- veyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated November 25, 1985, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated December 24, 1985, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460,.appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Marshall's letter dated December 2, 1985, a copy of which is attached. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. 16. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: a. All lots shall have a minimum size of 7200 square feet net. b. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C or Ordinance 460. Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.8B of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots. d. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the R-1 zone. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067 Conditions of Approval Page 3 17. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met. County Fire Department County Flood Control County Health Department County Planning Department Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone 4525 shallbe approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. c. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461. d. All existing structures on the subject property shall be removed prior to recordation of the final map. ee The final map shall reflect the combination of lots 61 and A. The final design of this combination shall be as approved by the Planning Director prior to the recordation of the final map. f. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460. *g. If street lighting is proposed to be installed in this subdivision, it shall be installed in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. 2) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 3) Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. * Amended per Planning Commission, Feb. 5, 1986. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067 Conditions of Approval Page 4 18. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department.and the Department of Building and Safety. The f~llowing note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "County Geologic Report.No. 326 was prepared for this property and is on 'file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern in the report are as follows: Liquifaction." The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar'Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations dated September 24, 1985, a copy of which is on file with the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety." Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: aj If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: 1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. 2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of 3anuary through March. 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that any adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067 Conditions of Approval Page 5 19. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: In accordance with the written request of the developer to the County of Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the agreement between the developer and the Elsinore Union High School District and the Temecula Union School District, no building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside.for any parcels within the subject tract until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with the terms of said agreement between the developer and the School District. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. * 20. If any off-site grading is proposed, the developer shall obtain the proper easement from the appropriate owners, prior to the recordation of the of the final map. ** 21. ~e-p~epe~e~-~a~na~e-d~e~?-a~-e½e~-en-~½e-~en~a~ve-map~-a½a~-~-be e~ab~s½e~-as-ea~emen~-en-½e~s-~½-~9~-an~-ma~n~a~ne~-by-~½e-e~ne~ e~-aa~a-½e~s~--Wn½eee-e~e~w~ee-app~e~e~-by-~e-P~ann~n~-~ee~e~. * Changed per Planning Commission, Feb. 5, 1986 **Deleted per Planning Commission, Feb. 5, 1986 DM:dw;et 'T SUBMFrrAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .~,, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,~ FROM: Planning Department SUBMIllALDATE: February 24, I 6 gB SUBJECT:TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21067 Amd. No. 3 - CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 45251 . Kingsway Construction - First Supervisortal District - Rancho California Area - 46 Acres - 118 Lots - Schedule 'A" - REQUEST: R-R to R-1 loning RECOMMENDED MOTION: The Planning Commission and Staff recommend: ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 20210 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and, APPROVAL of Change of Zone No. 4525 from R-R to R-1 in accordance with Exhibit No. 2, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Planning Commission minutes dated February 5, 1986; and, APPROVAL of Tentative Tract No. 21067, Amended No. 3 subject to the attached conditions, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Planning Commission minutes dated February 5, 1986. Rog _leF~ Streeter, Planning 'Director DM:csa ~ORM 11A 12/~2 ( } Prey. Agn. ref. Depts. Comments Dist. AGENDA NO. (REEL 888- SIDE 2- 363-686) CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 4525 - EA 20210 - Kingsvay Construction Corporation - llncho California Area - First Supervisorial District - 46~ acres, easterly of Jedediah Smith lid and southerly of St Hwy 79 - R-R to R-l, etc. TRACT 21067 AHENDED NO. 3 - EA 20210 - Kingsway Construction Corporation - Rancho California Area- First Supervisorial District- easterly of )dediah Smith Rd and southerly of St my 79 - 127 lots - 46+ acres - R-R Zone. Schedule A Subdivision The hearings were opened at 3:43 p.m. and closed at 4:00 p.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the negative declaration for EA 20210, approval of Change of Zone Case 4525 from R-R to R-1 in accordance with Exhibit 2, and approval of Tract 21067 Amended No. 3 subject to amended condi- tions. The subject property contained a mobilehome and a stable; surrounding land uses included a residential subdivision, vacant lots, a horse ranch and a storage facility. Staff thought the proposal would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Gerald Tutt, the engineer for the project, accepted the conditions as amended. William Martin, 45080 Temecula Lane, Temecula, advised there were six horse ranches in the immediate area on parcels ranging in size from 5 to 22 acres. Nr. Martin raised horses and cattle on adjacent property and asked whether the new ordinance relating to agricultural uses being considered by the Board of Supervisors would affect his rights. Nr. Salter asked whether he had lived there at last three years; when Nr. Martin advised he had lived there nine years Nr. Salter indicated he thought his use would be protected by State law. Hr. Martin ~es concerned about Temecula Lane, which ms fully maintained by himself and one other neighbor and asked whether this road would be used to provide access to Pala Road. Mr. Tutt advised the Road Department conditions required them to provide 32 feet of pavement from the end of the tract (which was the beginning of Temecula Lane) to the nearest paved County Road (Pala). The right of way for Temecula Lane had been offered for dedication on a pre- viously recorded parcel map and currently existed; they would be required to improve within that right of my. Therefore, there would be improved access from the tract down Temecula Lane to Pala. Mr. Martin had no further concerns. Louise Rouhe, 45100 Pala Road, owned a horse ranch in the immediate area and ms concerned about flooding and drainage problems. Mr. Kashuha advised the Flood Control District realized there ms an existing flooding problem and briefly described drainage patterns in this area. The project had been conditioned to construct a concrete channel to carry the flows. Hr. Tutt advised they had held many meetings with Rood Control staff, and he felt the flooding problems had been resolved. In addition, the property was within a flood plain and would have to meet Federal requirements. Although there would be additional traffic on the access road, he thought most of the traffic would move along Pala Road to the northwest where there were schools and shopping facilities. 35 There ms no further testimony, and the hearing ms closed at 4:00 p.m. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant proposed a change of zone on 46 acres from R-R to R-l, and the subdivision of the site into 118 single family residential lots; the subject property contains a mobilehome and a stable; surrounding land uses includes a residential subdivision, vacant lots, a horse ranch, and a storage facility; surrounding zoning is R-R, R-1 and C-l/C-P; General Plan policies call for Category II land use; liquefaction and flooding impact the site. The proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan; compatible with area development; conforms to all applicable County ordinances; and liquefaction and flooding concerns can he effectively mitigated. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. NOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Bresson, seconded by Con~nissioner MacGregor and unanimously carried, the Commission recomended to the Board of Supervisors adoption of the negative declaration for EA 20210, approval of Change of Zone Case 4525 from R-R to R-1 in accordance with Exhibit 2, and approval of Tentative Tract 21067 Amended No. 3 subject to the proposed conditions, amended as follows, based on the above findings and conclusions and the recommendations of staff. 17(g) - Delete the first two lines and replace with the following: If street lighting is proposed to be installed in this subdivision, it shal 1 be instal led as: 20. - If any off-site grading is proposed, the developer shall obtain the proper easements from the appropriate o~ners, prior to recordation of the final nmp. 21. - Delete entirely. ROLL CALL VOTE RESULTED AS FOLLO~IS: AYES: Commissioners Bresson, MacGregor, Oonahoe, Purrlance and Bead ling NOES: None ABSENT: None 36 ii GOLF VAC COURSE cZ 42,10 VAC · A,~. KINGSWAY CONSTRUCTION CORe t.OC&T:ONAs.. UAP UN R'R TO R-I See. IS T. 8S.,R.2W. 41esesser's Bk.926 Pg. 15 .,~---~ /r; Circuletimt PALA RD. ART. I10' :"",S' t'I-/I-I-dLW LeRoy D. Smoot '- .. IO~ COMNL$S~ONEll · COUNTY $uevSYOe Rtver~:lde County Planning C~;~ss~on 4080 Lemon Street R~vers~de, CA 9Z50~ ~ OFFICE OF ROAD: ,'OMMIS$1ONER 6 COUNTY SURVEYOR · .November 2~, 1985 Ladies and Gentlemen: Tract Map 21067 - Amend ~3 Schedule A - Team 2 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that' the landdivider provide the following street improvements and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County I~oad Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the Tentative Rap correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, and that their omission may require the map to b~ resubmitted for further. consideration. These Ordinances' and the following conditions are essential parts and a require,~ent occuring :.in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Comm~ssioner's Office. I. The landdivider shall protect downstream pro. perties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage p~tterns, i.e., concentration of diversion of. flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities or'by securing a drainage easement or by both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: mDrainage Easement - no buildings, obstructions, or · encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. 2. The landdivider shall accept'and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto 'or through the' site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the ROad Department. · tract Map 21067 - Amend ~3 ..Schedule A - Team 2 Nov~,er 27, 1985 ~ndttions je 2' 3, Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as.approved by the Road Department. Pala Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up'asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction or resurfacing. of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. "A" Street,."C" Street, "~" Street and 'F" Street (northerly of lot 55) shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. {40'/60'). 'B" Street shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard Ho. 105, Section ~. (36'/ 60'). -- 'F" Street (from lot 55 southeasterly) shall be improved with '28 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 40 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 110, Section A..:{20'/_30'3. 8, Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 409 and 401 (curb sidewalk). g. A secondary access road to the nearest paved road'maintained by the County shall be constructed within the public right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B, (32'/60') at a grade and alignment as approved by the Road Commissioner. This ts necessary for circulation purposes. 10. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash .sum of $150~00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the · developer choose to d~fer the time of payment, he may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring'said .payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. No traffic signal mitigation for open space lot ~118 will be required at this time. 11, Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment aS approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County. Tract Hap 21067 - Amend #3 Schedule A - Team 2 Nov~nber 27, 1985 " Condt. tions Page 3 Electrical and ~ommunications trenches shall be'provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. 13. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall 6e-applied not less'than fourteen days following placement of the.asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05-gallon per square yard.. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of th~ State'Standard Specifications. ~4. Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be constructed throughout the landdivison.. 15. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. 16. Lot access shall be restricted on Pala Road and Jedediah Smith Road · and so noted on the final map with the exception of lot 118. 17. 'Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control,' sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Deparb~ent. 18. The landdivide~ shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation o4 the final map. 19. The minimum centerline radii 'shall be 300' or'as approved by the Road Department: " 20. The minimum lot frohtages along th~ cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. 1o Street trees shall be planted in co~formance with the provisions of Article 13a of Ordinance 460.53 and their location{s) shall be.shown on street improvement plans.· 22, All driveways shall conform to the applicable'Riverside County. Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plan~. 23. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° or' radial or as approved by the Road Department~ .. 24. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with Tract 13060-5 {MB 135/87-90) and Tract 13060-- 6 (Ms 135/83-86). Tract Nap 21067 - Amend #3 '.Schedule A- Team 2 Novqnber 27, 1965 *Conditions, tge 4 Prior to recor~ation of any phase of Tract 21067, proceedings for an assessment district for the construction of a four lane bridge O~ Pala Road at the Temecula Creek shall be successfully completed. GH:lh Very truly yours,7 Gus Hughes - Road DivisiOn Engineer KENNETH L. EDWARD8 CHIEF' ENGINEIll lies MANKL'rlT~EET P.O. IOX TEL. EPHONE (7T4) 717-2015 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVIRIIDI. CALIItONNIA IIBOt December 24, 1985 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California DE C Z y 1985 RIVERSIDE COUNTy PLANNING COMMISSION Attention: Regional Team No. 2 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Tract 21067 (Amended Map No. 3) Tentative Tract 21067 is a proposal to subdivide approximately 46 acres in the Rancho California area. The property is located northerly of Pala Road and southerly of State Highway 79. The property is subject to flooding from two distinct sources. Most of the property lies within the 100 year flood plain of Temecula Creek. The most northerly portion of the property has been designated "floodway" on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map of the area published in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program. The tentative map recognizes this fact and delineates the floodway area as open space. Considerable quantities of Temecula Creek overbank flow may approach the property along the easterly boundary. The property is also subject to flooding from approximately one square mile of local watershed located to the southeast. These flows approach the property along the north side of Pala Road. Under current Federal Emergency Management Agency Regulations the proposed lots must be floodproofed by elevation above expected flooding levels. This will require placing substantial fill material on the property. To avoid blocking overbank flood flows from the east, the tentative map proposes an open flow through area in the vicinity of the intersection of "E" and "F" Streets along with a collection ditch adjacent to Lots 62-79 and a setback adjacent to Lots 47, 48 and 60. This concept is appropriate if properly designed. Following are the District's recommendations: That portion of the property which has been designated "floodway" in conjunction with the Flood Insurance Program should be delineated and labeled as "floodway" on the environmental constraint sheet. A note should be placed on the environmental constraint sheet stating, "Floodway must be kept free of all buildings and obstructions including landfills." Riverside County Re: Tract 21067 (Amended Map No. 3) -2- December 24; 1985 The engineer should submit a hydraulic analysis of Temecula Creek. The study should analyze both existing and proposed geometry and be based on dynamic flow condi- tions. A 100 year flow rate of 36,000 cfs should be uti- lized for design purposes. Building pads for all lots in this tract should be elevated a minimum of one foot above the "floodway" water surface. Fill banks which will be exposed to flowing water should be hardened with riprap or concrete to protect against erosion. Velocities greater than 5 feet per second should be considered erosive. The slope protection should extend from the top of embankment to a depth below adjacent ground based on velocity of flow. An area should remain open adjacent to the intersection of "E" and "F" Streets to allow for the conveyance of overbank flood flows. The exact width of this area is to be determined at the time of final design and based on the quantity of overbank flow. Slope protection should be provided where erosive velocities are expected. A concrete lined drainage facility should be installed adjacent to Lots 61-79 to convey overbank flows which are not contained in the existing ditch along Pala Road. If located offsite, this facility should be installed within a recorded drainage easment. Alternatively, this facili- ty should be installed within the limits of this tract. The existing concrete lined channel adjacent to Pala Road should be extended upstream to the tract boundary. The channel should be extended downstream to a point past Lot 23. Appropriate energy dissipation facilities should be installed. A grading and building setback of 20 feet along the east- erly side of Lots 47, 48 and 60 should be maintained. This area should be delineated and labeled on the en- vironmental constraint sheet. A note should be placed on the environmental constraint sheet stating, "The setback area must be kept free of all buildings and obstructions, including landfills." Drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free of build- ings and obstructions." Riverside County Re: Tract 21067 (Amended Map No. 3) -3- December 24~ 1985 12. cc: All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these criteria is exceeded additional drainage facilities should be installed. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows. Additional emergency escape should also be provided. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal- culations should be submitted to the District for review prior to recordation of the final map. Very truly yours, ~Tf Enyn~ ~ief of Planning Division Road Dept. Dept. of Building & Safety McCutchan Company, Inc. MC:bjp County of R xrex-s e John Blschoff v~slng Planner Team II F~%OM,- Lou'~anck - Engineering Geologist Da'X'M:, 12'12~85 Review of Liquefaction Evaluation for Tentative Tract No. 21067 We have .reviewed the report entitled: Preliminary Soil Investigation/Liquefaction study, Tentative Tract No. 21067 (46 Acres), Rancho California, Riverside County, California, dated July 19, 1985; prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc. Project No. 6850953-01, Response to October 29, 1985, County review of Report Titled "Prelim- inary Soil Investigation/Liquefaction Study, Tentative Tract No. 21067 (46-"! Acres) Rancho California, California, dated July 19, 1985, Pro- ject No. 6850953-01", Prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc., Pro- ject No. 6850953-02, Meeting with County Building and Safety Representatives pertaining to Liquefaction Study, Tentative Tract No. 21067, Rancho California (Leighton and Associates Report dated July 19, 1985, Project No. 6850953- -01), dated December 10, 1985; prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc., Project No. 6850943-02. The reports have recognized a potentially li~efiable "local layer" at the depth of 38 feet. The report states: "In our opinion, no mitiga- tion measures are warranted due to the great depth of the soil layer, weight of the overburden soils, and the depth of the ground water table (26 feet)." I would recommend that a compacted fill mat and foundation steel reinforcement he considered for this local area. It appears that the reports and their addendums satisfy the additional information requested by the Planning Team under the California Envi- ronmental Quality Act review. 284-143 1/80 TI: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Planning Department - Team 2 F1OM: H. Ralph Luchs, R.S. Administrative Supervisor Environmental Health Services Division (EHSD) IE: SAN 53 Requirements - Tract No. 21067 The Environmental Health Services Division has reviewed the tentative map for this project and cannot make any recommen- dations until a sanitation letter is filed. The requirements for a SAN 53 letter are as follows: A satisfactory soils percolation test to prove the project feasible. A clearance letter from the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board. 3. Two copies of the tentative map. A "will serve" letter from the agency/agencies serving potable water. Should the project be served sanitary sewer service, this Department would need only: 1. A "will serve" letter from the agency/agencies serving potable water. 2. One copy of the tentative map. If the project is to be served water by existing wells, pumps and water tanks, a water supply permit will be required. (Contact the EHSD, Engineering Section at 787-6543). The requirements for a water supply permit are as follows: Satisfactory laboratory tests (bacteriological, organic, inorganic, general physical, and general mineral) to prove the water potable. A complete set of plans showing all details of the pro- posed and existing water systems: sizes and types of pipe and calculations showing that adequate quantity and pressure can be maintained (California Waterworks Standards - California Health and Safety Code and California Administrative Code, Title 22). These plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. DATE: September 16, 1985 TO: Assessor Building and Safety Surveyor Road Department Health Fire Protection Rood Control District m EOFEFTVEp',, SEP 301985 (IIwI, NN|NG CX:)MMfiI~KXI~ RECEIVED SEP 24 1985 pALOMAR OBSERVAIDRY Southern Cali f. Gas Southern Calif. Edison General Tel ephone Eastern Muni. Water Rancho Calif. Water Commissioner Bresson Mr. Palomar TRACT NO. 21067 -(Tm 2) - E.A. 20210 - Kingsway Construction - McCutchan Co - Rancho California - 1st Supervisorial Dist - Ely Jedediah Smith Road, Sly Hwy 79 - R-R - REOUEST: Schedule A Subdivision of 46. acres into 127 lots with No Waiver - (Related Case: CZ 4525} - Hod ~.11.q A.P. ~926-150-021 A 031 Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for September 26, 1985. If it clears, it will then go to public hearing. Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to September 24, lq85 in order that we may include them in the staff report for this particular case. Should you. have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact D ~d Mare~t 787- 2 1 av 33 Planner CO4NENTS: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DATE: 9/24/85 SIGNATURE 'LEASE print name and title Dr. Robert 3. Brucato/Assistant Dtrector/Palomar ~|OGO LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR PALOMAR OBSERVATORY 105-24 This case is within 30 miles of the Palomar Observatory and is therefore within the zone requiring the use of low-pressure sodium vapor lamps for street lighting, as stipulated by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. We request that the design for other types of outdoor lighting that may be employed on this property be made consistent with the spirit of the decision of the Board of Supervisors which is intended to mitigate the adverse effects such facilities have on the astronomica/research at Palomar. Beneficial steps to that end include: 1. Use the minimum amount of light needed. 2. Orient and shield light to prevent direct upward illumination. 3. Turn off lights when they are not needed. 4. Use low-pressure sodium lamps to the greatest extent possible. For further information, call (818) 356-4035. Robert J. Brucato Assistant Director PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125 TELEPHONE (818) 35b-4033 TELEX 675425 CALTECH PSD ~{~ Ri| ERSiDE'a= ~ · <' RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RAY HEBRARD FIRE CHIEF 12-02-85 To: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE: (714) 657 -3 ! 83 Attn: Team II Re: TR 21067 - Amendment #3 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department reconw, ends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2~") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 500 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 250 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 500 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one (1) copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." MITIGATION FEES Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $300.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the drveloper choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. cdt Planning Officer D PIning Department - Team 2 November 25, 1985 H. Ralph Luchs, R.S., Senior Sanitarian - Environmental Health Services Division Tract No. 21067 Amended Map No. 3 The Environmental Health Services Division has reviewed the Amended Map No. 3 dated November 19, 1985. Our current connents will remain as stated in our previous letter dated October 4, 1985. HRL:cg GEN. FORM 4. ~/6S 1985 RIV[RSIDE COUNTy PLANNING COMMISSION CUNTY OF RIVERSIDE- DEPARTMENT OF iS?~8- Iltt~ STWEET MAL. L (IwC)S1' OFFICE IOX 131'0)- IIIVB~S ID~. Ca, 1250~ HEALTH October 4, 1985 OCT ' Y 1885 RIVER~i::~(X:)tJNTY Riverside County Planning Department - Team 2 IPI, AHNINGC,~ 4080 Lemon St. (10/1/86 Riverside, CA 92501 Amended Map No. 1) RE: TRACT NO. 21067; Parcel 2 of PM 6427 as shown on map filed in PM 17/72 and Parcel 4 of PM 8856 as shown on map filed in PM 41/72-73. (125 Lots) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 21067 and recommends that: A water system be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects. with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California,.when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 21067 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water service, storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such tract. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose." This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the County Surve or's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request~orr' _t'~_e recordation of the fin__al___m~. This Department has a statement from the Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. Planning Department TRACT NO. 21067 -2- October 4, 1985 This Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the district. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the district, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of ~he plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with.the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract No. 21067 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract." The plans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review at least. ~wo weeks prior to the.request for the recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. Sincerely, H.R hL h R.S. alp uc s, Administrative Supervisor HRL:cg September 23, 1985 Wa r Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, California 92501-3657 Gent1 emen: Water service is directly available to the above-referenced property from a waterline located within Pala Road. Rancho California Water District feels it is imperative that present water availability or non-availability be indicated on all final maps, and recommends approval of final maps be contingent upon same. Property would be subject to Rancho California Water District Stand- By charges and Ad Valorem Tax. Wells are not permitted on properties where water service could be made available. If we can be of further service to you, please contact this office. Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Laurie Williams Customer Service Representative File: Board of Directors: Jon A. Lundin Board President 8tan Mills General Manager P.M. 6427-Engineering Doug Kulberg T.C. Rowe Dallas Gray ;effrey L. Minkler Tom A. Leevers James A. Darby Rutan and Tucker Legal Counsel RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT ~tlR1 rllA~. I:~FIAT'I · P('),~T ('11~1~1~1~.. l:lt'lW 1'74 · TI~.MI~,~.ITT,A #'2 7><-/Z ~ C ,,-,,, ,"2 - "'~ GEN. FORM 4, 3165 DEC - 3 iS85 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: September 16, 1985 TO: Assessor Building and Safety Surveyor Road Deparbne~t Health Fire Protection Flood Control District L~ OCl-llBB5 ) FI, AI. tNING Southern Calif. Gas Southern Calif. Edison General Telephone Eastern Muni. Water Rancho Calif. Water Commissioner Bresson Mt. Palomar TRACT NO. 21067 - (Tm 2) - E.A. 20210 - Kingsway Construction - McCutchan Co - Rancho California - 1st Supervisorial Dist - Ely Jedediah Smith Road, Sly Hwy 79 - R-R - REOUEST: Schedule A Subdivision of 46. acres into 127 lots with No Waiver - (Related Case: CZ 4525} - Mod ~119 A.P. #926-150-021 ~ 031 Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for September 26, 1985. If it clears, it will then go to public hearing. Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to September 24, 1~85 in order that we may include them in the staff report for this particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact David !taresat 787- 2331 Planner CO4MENTS: DATE: ~r.~. ~,F" SIGNATURE ~ ,,'-/~- ~ ' ~ / / /LEASE print name and title/ CARM ;.N F,~_. ,A..:" -'lann~Pp 4080 LEMON STREET. gT, FLOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 30/. INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 September 23, 1985 Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, California 92501-3657 Gentlemen: Water service is directly available to the above-referenced property from a waterline located within Pala Road. Rancho California Water District feels it is imperative that present water availability or non-availability be indicated on all final maps, and recommends approval of final maps be contingent upon same. Property would be subject to Rancho California Water District Stand- By charges and Ad Valorem Tax. Wells are not permitted on properties where water service could be made available. If we can be of further service to you, please contact this offlce. Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Laurie Willjams Customer Service Representative File: Board of Directors: ;Ion A. Lundin Board President Stan Mills General Manager P.M. 6427-Engineering Doug Kulberg T.C. Rowe Dallas Gray Jeffrey L. Minkler RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 2R~R1 I')TA'7,, ]~C]AT] P(~.qT CI1~'I;'TC~ R~Y 17A 8 T~M~TTT.A ~A Tom A. Leevers ;lames A. Darby Rutan and Tucker Legal Counsel DISTRICT QOQQr~ , ~tA DATE: 5eptm~er 16. 1985 TO: ~ssessor - L'I' Road !)epar1~nent Heal th ItlVt~ C(X~1 Y Ftre Protection FId~NING Gi:3MMIII4C~ flood Control Dtstrtct Southern Calif. Gas Southern Calt f. Edison General Tel ephone Eastern Huni. Water Rancho Calif. Water Conrntsstoner Bresson PIt.. Palomar TRACT N0. 21067 - (Tin 2) - E.A. 20210 - Kingsway Construction - NcCutchan Co - Rancho r~l ifornia - 1st .~upervisorial Dtst - Ely Jedediah Smith Road, Sly Hwy 79 - R-R - REOUEST: Schedule A Suhxtiviston of 46 acres into 127 lots with No Waiver - {Related Case: CZ 4525) - Nod e119 A.P. t926-150-021 ~ 031 Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for September 26, 1985. If it clears, it will then go to public hearing. Your camments and recommendations are requested prior to September 24, lqB5 in order that we may include then in the staff report for this particular case. $hould E~av% have any questions regarding this item, d Nare~t 787- 233~ ~lanner please do not hesitate to contact Z)ATE: ,~"-,~-4j~ ~.r""' SIGNATURE ~ ,, --/'' ~- ': - - - / PLEASE print name and titl~ CARM 'N &l _., .... 4080 LEMON STREET. 9'" FLOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 30/. INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 3~2-8277 NOISS~AV~O~ 9NINNV'Id M. NnO0 ,~CIIS~3AI>.J CITYOF~ AGENDA RI~ORT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND SALARY RANGE FOR JOB CLASSIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is my recommendation that the City Council adopt the attached resolution along with the list of position rifles and salary ranges as shown in Exhibit A; and approve the organizational structure as contained in the memorandum dated August 8, 1990 BACKGROUND The memorandum dated August 8, 1990 entitled Organizational Structure, addresses an organizational structure to better serve this community. It divides the organization into two managerial positions; that being developmental services, and administrative support. I have aim included a proposed organization structure outline noting the above- mentioned divisions. This graphically represents functional responsibilities and not specific positions. Also attached is a report dated July 25, 1990 with an update dated August 6, 1990, containing recommendations for the City Council to consider. These recommendations deal with job description, classification, and salary. I have also included a resolution for City~~ Counc adoption. CITY OF TEMECULA Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor Ron Parks Vice Mayor Karel Lindemans Councilmember Pat Birdsall Councilmember Peg Moon Councilmember Sal Munoz David F. Dixon, City Manager August 8, 1990 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE In the past thirty days I have done a lot of thinking about structuring the organization to be responsive to public needs and wants. Frank Aleshire structured the organization, as contained in the 1990-91 budget, horizontally with many functions and directors reporting to the City Manager. I personally find this somewhat cumbersome and awkward to implement and would prefer to structure the organization to better serve the elected officials and the public. I propose to restructure the organization by dividing it into two managerial divisions, they being developmental services and administrative support. Developmental services would include planning, building and safety, community services, and public works, along with contractual administration for engineering, plan check, public works inspection, infrastructure design and assessment district creation. Administrative support would include finance, personnel, risk management, purchasing, management information systems, and record keeping. Administrative support would also manage the contracts for police, fire, animal control, and disaster preparedness. To accomplish the above task, I would establish two positions: (1) Assistant City Manager/Director of Developmental Services; and (2) Assistant City Manager/Director of Administrative Support. Each of the above noted positions would have certain administrative tasks specifically assigned to them, as well as the management over-sight of other specialty functions. Coordination of work, responsibility, and authority would be channeled into these positions, thereby reducing the span of control and requiring greater accountability for their particular responsibilities. Organizational Structure August 8, 1990 Page No. 2 As City Manager I am not abdicating or reducing my role, as I will be responsible for the effectiveness of the total operations by establishing the two manager divisions, and appointing bright, well-qualified people to the positions. My time will be spent more effectively in leading and managing the available resources and putting into clear prospective the policy directions of the City Council. I will place strong emphasis on quality of life and balancing the wants and needs of this community against the reality of critical resources. Attached you will find a very basic organizational chart, a proposed salary range, and a job description for those positions not yet authorized by the City Council. I am anxious to have the City Council consider this organizational structure and would ask your support for its implementation at the earliest possible opportunity. DFD:sjf Attachment r- C: ' e u. (:::) ierrl ldeas for Effective Management City of Temecula Table of Contents July 25, 1990 Recommendation .................................... 1 Background ....................................... 1 Position Summaries .................................. 1 Chief Accountant ................................. 1 Senior Accountant ................................ 2 Management Analyst (includes Network Administrator) ........ 2 Director of Building and Safety ........................ 3 Senior Building Inspector ............................ 3 Building Inspector ................................. 4 Director of Community Services ....................... 4 Maintenance Supervisor ............................. 5 Senior Maintenance Worker .......................... 5 Maintenance Worker ............................... 6 Senior Planner (Park Development Coordinator) ............. 6 Recreation Supervisor (includes Volunteer Coordinator) ........ 6 Recreation Leader ................................ 7 Salaries .......................................... 7 Resolution ........................................ 8 Attachment I - Resolution ............................. 9 Attachment II - Salary Survey .......................... 10 P.O. Box 3253 · Tusttn, CA 92681 · 714 - 669-[]309 iel~ldeas for Effective Management City of Temecula Classification Titles, Salary Ranges & Initial Personnel Policies Report & Recommendations July 25, 1990 Recommendation: Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment I) which includes classification titles and salary ranges for new positions included in the FY 1990/91 budget which are not covered by the City's currently authorized position titles. Background: As organizations grow and develop, new programs and responsibilities require the addition of new staff. In order to accommodate these new responsibilities, it is often necessary to establish new classification titles and salary ranges. The City established initial classification titles on the basis of brief job concept summaries. The City's initial salary ranges were based on a salary survey for surrounding communities and available private sector data. A similar approach has been followed in developing the recommendations in this report. Position Summaries: The FY 1990/91 budget includes the following proposed job positions: Chief Accountant Under general direction to plan, organize and direct the City's fiscal reporting and fiscal operations functions; to supervise assigned staff; to prepare and present financial, statistical and narrative reports; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of principles and methods of municipal finance administration including accounting, budgeting and financing; laws regulating municipal government financial management. Ability to plan, organize and direct the maintenance of municipal financial records; monitor, analyze, verify and reconcile accounts receivable, accounts payable, budget expenditures, revenue projections and other financial data; recommend and implement and update comprehensive financial and accounting practices and strategies; select, train, supervise and evaluate assigned staff; plan, develop, prepare and present operating and capital improvement budgets. Four years of progressively responsible accounting experience which involved City of Temecula - Classification Titles & Salary Ranges -RO. Box 3253 · Tustin, CA 92681 · 744 - 669-0309 ............. directing the maintenance of a variety of records, recommending and implementing accounting and financial programs and supervising staff. Graduation from an accredited college or university with major course work in accounting, finance or a closely related field. Senior Accountant Under direction to perform a variety of professional accounting work related to maintaining and processing of the City's financial records; to design and provide a variety of financial reports to assist in the effective management of the City; to research and resolve financial problems; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of the principles of financial administration, including financial recordkeeping, financial document verification, budgeting and reporting; automated financial systems including ledgers, journals, reconciliations and financial reporting; the principles of accounting practice. Ability to interpret and apply general government accounting and auditing principles, procedures and methods; develop, organize and prepare routine narrative and statistical reports to explain or record financial transactions, revenue sources and status of accounts; determine appropriate classification of accounts and funds in making accurate and consistent journal entries to record financial matters; analyze and utilize full application of a data processing system. Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major course work in accounting or business administration. Three years of experience in professional accounting work which involved maintaining a variety of accounts, providing reports of financial activity, auditing financial transactions, making adjustments and advising management on various accounting issues. Management Analyst (includes Network Administrator) Under general direction to perform a variety of complex financial, budgetary and administrative work; to provide staff assistance within or to City departments; to research, write and present reports and recommendations on a wide variety of topics or issues; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of principles of municipal government management; principles of financial and budget management in municipal government organizations; municipal programs such as but not limited to purchasing, personnel, risk management, finance, budgeting or other municipal government related programs. City of Temecula - Classification Titles & Salary Ranges 2 Ability to research and analyze financial, budget or administrative issues or questions; develop and present oral and written recommendations on a variety of financial, budget and administrative issues; write clear, logical and concise reports and correspondence on a variety of financial, budget and administrative issues; communicate effectively and maintain effective working relationships with citizens, City officials, staff and others regarding a variety of City policies, procedures and practices; administer assigned programs or projects; use or learn to use a computer to perform administrative or statistical analysis related to assigned duties. Graduation from an accredited college or university with a major in accounting, business public administration, finance administration, personnel management, economics or a closely related field. Three years of experience researching, analyzing, and recommending policies, procedures or actions on a variety of administrative issues. (Specific experience may be required for some positions.) Director of Building and Safety Under general direction to plan, organize and direct the plan review, field inspection and code enforcement functions; to supervise assigned staff; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of building construction techniques, principles and practices including plumbing, electrical, carpentry and seismic issues; construction contracting; the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Code and general health and safety codes related to construction. Ability to plan, organize and direct a comprehensive building and safety function; select, train, supervise and evaluate assigned staff; develop, recommend and implement policies and procedures; work with building contractors, citizens other officials and others to effectively administer assigned functions. Four years of experience in municipal government or related building and safety programs which included field inspection and the supervision of employees. Graduation from an accredited college or university with a major in architecture, structural engineering or civil engineering or equivalent experience. Senior Building Insvector Under direction to perform difficult, complex and/or specialized inspections of public and private construction projects; to enforce building and other codes; to City of Temecula - Classification Titles & Salary Ranges 3 prepare reports and recommendations; to supervise other building and safety employees; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of principles, methods, materials, equipment, construction, surveying and safety techniques related to the construction of residential, commercial and industrial buildings; soil conditions, types and formations; basic mathematics including, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and measurements; technical expertise in at least two construction fields such as carpentry, electrical, plumbing, grading mechanical or other closely related fields. Ability to read, understand, interpret and apply plans, specifications, codes and related records; inspect construction and detect faulty materials, workmanship and practices; communicate clearly both orally and in writing with contractors, citizens, officials and others; oversee and train lower level building and safety staff. Two years experience in municipal building inspection or a closely related field. Completion of some course work related to construction and/or inspection of residential, commercial and/or industrial construction. Building InsDector Under general supervision to inspect public and private construction projects to assure compliance with codes, specifications and regulations; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of principles, methods, materials, equipment, construction, surveying and safety techniques related to the construction of residential, commercial and industrial buildings; soil conditions, types and formations; basic mathematics including, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and measurements; technical expertise in at least two construction fields such as carpentry, electrical, plumbing, grading, mechanical or other closely related fields. Ability to read, understand, interpret and apply plans, specifications, codes and related records; inspect construction and detect faulty materials, workmanship and practices; communicate clearly both orally and in writing with contractors, citizens, officials and others. Director of Community Services Under administrative direction to plan, organize and direct the parks and recreation program; to develop and implement a full range of community programs including, but not limited to, human and leisure services, cultural arts, sports and other City of Temecula - Classification Titles & Salary Ranges 4 related programs; to plan and direct the park maintenance and development program; to serve as a member of the City's management team; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of a wide variety of community based recreation programs and concepts; park maintenance procedures and practices; park and recreation facility planning and development; principles of supervision and management. Ability to plan, organize and develop a comprehensive park maintenance and recreation program for the community; to work with community leaders and program participants to effectively meet their needs; to supervise staff; to serve as an active member of the City's management team. Approximately five years of progressively responsible experience which involved supervising park maintenance programs and planning and directing community based recreation programs. Graduation from an accredited college or university with major course work in recreation, sports, sociology, public administration or a closely related field. Maintenance Supervisor Under direction to plan, supervise and perform building, facility and landscape maintenance for assigned areas; to coordinate the work of contractors; to repair or coordinate the repair of maintenance related equipment; to maintain maintenance records; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of methods, materials and procedures used in the maintenance of building, landscaping, roadways and related equipment and facilities; purpose and safe use of a wide variety of maintenance and construction related tools and equipment; safe work practices. Ability to supervise employees assigned to perform work related to maintenance of one or more facilities; to perform a wide variety of maintenance tasks; to coordinate the work of outside contractors; to establish and maintain maintenance records; to communicate effectively; to read blue prinus and schematics. Approximately three years experience performing a variety of maintenance related work which involved landscaping, irrigation systems, buildings and related equipment. Senior Maintenance Worker Under direction to maintain buildings, equipment and facilities; to perform general City of Temecula - Classification Titles & Salary Ranges 5 carpentry, electrical and plumbing work; to provide direction to other maintenance employees; to inspect, monitor and perform routine preventative maintenance operating equipment such as, but not limited to air conditioners, pumps and other equipment; to maintain maintenance records; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of methods, techniques and tools used in the repair and maintenance of buildings, equipment and facilities; safe operation and uses of hand and power tools; basic principles of electrical and plumbing maintenance and carpentry. Ability to perform skilled and semi-skilled maintenance, construction and repair work; to perform plumbing, carpentry, painting, electrical; and mechanical maintenance and repair tasks; to safely use hand tools and operate electrical and other power tools; to work independently; to maintain maintenance related records. Maintenance Worker Under general supervision to perform a variety of general maintenance tasks; to provide skilled and semi skilled labor related to maintenance, minor construction and related activities; to use hand and power tools; to operate equipment; and to perform a variety of other work as required. Knowledge of hand tools, power tools and light construction equipment and their uses and applications; general landscape maintenance; safe work practices. Ability to perform a variety of general maintenance tasks and to learn to perform new or more difficult tasks as assigned; perform heavy manual labor for extended periods of time; understand and follow written and oral instructions. Some experience performing general maintenance tasks. Senior Planner (Park Development Coordinator) We are recommending that this position be classified in the existing Senior Planner classification. It will work with consultant, architects, the community and others in planning and developing park and recreation facilities. The salary survey indicates a salary similar to Senior Planner is appropriate for this type of work. We prefer not to recommend specialty classes in new organizations any more than necessary pending the evolution of work assignments as the organizational structure is implemented. Recreation Supervisor (includes Volunteer Coordinator) Under general supervision to plan, implement and supervise recreation and leisure time programs for a variety of age groups; to prepare and distribute program City of T~necula - Classification Titles & Salary Ranges 6 Assista.n~: C,:v Mana~rer Under administrative direction to plan, organize and direct a wide variety of City programs or departxnents through department heads and other managers; to function as an active member of the City's top management team; to research, recommend, implement and/or administer a wide variety of policy, administrative and program issues; to work with representatives of the comrnunity~ other public agencies, private firms and others; to act in the absence of the City Manager; to actively participate in the development and administration of City budgets; and to do other work as necessary. Knowledge of public administration including, but not limited to, public finance, budgeting, supervision, personnel and purchasing; federal state and local laws, rules and regulations related to the administration of a municipal government agency; operating procedures for City Council and related commissions including, but not limited to, report preparation and presentation, public speaking, policy guidance and related issues. Ability to plan, organize and direct a wide variety of City programs through department heads and other managers; to select, train and evaluate staff; to research, recommend and implement a wide variety of policy, administrative and program issues; to communicate clearly and concisely in verbally and in writing; to actively participate as a member of the City*s top management team; to work effectively with the community and representatives of other public and private organizations. Five years of progressively responsible experience managing program or department functions which included supervising lower level managers or supervisors, working with representatives of other organizations, participating in policy decisions and researching, presenting and implementing recommendations on policy, procedure and program issues. Graduation from an accredited college or university with a major in public or business administration or a closely related field. (August 6, 1990) publicity; to supervise assigned staff; and to do other work as required. Knowledge of procedures and practices for planning, implementing and supervising a variety of recreation programs for all age groups; recreation program publicity; basic principles of supervision. Ability to plan, implement and supervise community based recreation and leisure programs; supervise assigned staff; maintain records; develop flyers and other materials to announce or advertise recreation related programs. Some college course work in recreation, public administration or a related field. Approximately two years of experience in recreation programs. Recreation Leader Under supervision to carry out specific recreation programs; and to do other work as required. Ability to implement assigned programs; to direct and oversee recreation activities of a wide variety of groups. Salaries We have conducted a salary survey which included the following agencies: City of Corona City of Escondido City of Hemet City of Lake Elsinore City of Moreno Valley City of Perris City of San Marcos City of Riverside Rancho California Water District In addition, we have reviewed information from the 1989 Merchants and Manufacturers Association (M&M) Inland Empire Wage Rate Survey. The M&M survey includes information from 76 firms in the Riverside/San Bernadino County area. However, our recommendations are based primarily on the data collected from the nine agencies listed above. Generally, we are recommending salary ranges which are at, or slightly above the median rate of the survey agencies. City of Temecula - Classification Titles & Salary Ranges 7 Attachment I - Resolution RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERSONNEL POLICIES WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter of the City's Municipal Code, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt those policies as identified below; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: SECTION 1. The attached list of Position Titles and Salaries (Exhibit A) is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. This list of Position Titles and Salaries shall become effective immediately and may be thereafter amended. SECTION 3. The City Manager shall implement the above list of Position Titles and Salaries and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's personnel policies. SECTION 4. All prior resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the __ day of , 1990. Mayor I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of , 1990, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS City Clerk City of Temecula - Salary Survey - 25-Jul-90 Senior Building Agency Inspector City of Corona 3445 4187 City of Escondido 2676 3254 City of Hemet 2524 3067 City of Lake Elsinore 2427 3107 City of Moreno Valley 2972 3793 City of Perris 2624 3190 City of Riverside 2850 3464 City of San Marcos 2775 3373 Rancho Calif. Water Dist. Mean Survey Agencies 2787 3429 Median Survey Agencies 2726 3314 Merchants & Manufacturers ~City of Temecula 2675 3331 Building Inspector 2062 2286 2310 2354 2377 2585 2617 2370 2354 2431 2506 2779 2958 3004 2890 3142 3182 2923 3004 3027 Chief Accountant 3046 3702 3374 5060 3118 3979 2427 3107 3539 451 7 2500 4000 4064 3001 4061 3082 4000 3377 4205 Director of Building & Safety 6878 4327 6490 3528 4502 4391 5620 5322 6792 4625 5620 4421 5643 3800 6300 4345 5981 4391 5972 5060 6300 Maintenance Worker 1964 2387 2110 2566 2176 2645 1733 2107 1555 1914 1908 2324 1964 2387 1765 2423 1952 2431 Management Analyst 2448 2976 3007 4510 2497 3186 2199 2815 2972 3793 2100 3600 2537 3480 2473 3393~ 2731 3393~ Page 1 tembud90.wkl City of Temecula - Salary Survey - 25-Jul-90 A_~encv City of Corona City of Escondido City of Hemet City of Lake Elsinore City of Moreno Valley City of Perris City of Riverside City of San Marcos Rancho Calif. Water Dist. Mean Survey Agencies I Median Survey Agencies Merchants & Manufacturers JCity of Temecula Network Administrator 3198 3887 2200 3300 2500 4000 Director Community Services 4327 3706 4179 5322 4184 5218 3800 Maintenance Maintenance Supervisor Worker 6878 3526 4285 1696 2062 6490 3007 4510 1730 2102 4730 3118 3979 1579 1919 5349 3694 4728 1556 1992 6792 2804 3578 1659 2118 5083 2624 3190 1603 1948 6524 3748 4556 1893 2301 6300 3017 3667 1733 2107 2633 3729 4391 6018 2500 3887 4184 6395 3089 3873 5236 6519 3192 4062 3068 4132 3331 4148 Park Development Recreation Coordinator Supervisor 3798 4615 2834 3445 3007 4510 2354 2860 2495 3185 3150 4020 2564 3116 2610 3331 2298 2794 1681 2069 3318 4382 2526 3122 1678 2082 3150 4510 2530 3151J 1667 2076 3642 4534 2533 3154I Page 2 tembud90.wkl City of Temecula - Salary Survey - 25-Jul-90 Recreation A_~encv Leader City of Corona 839 926 City of Escondido 1928 2344 City of Hemet City of Lake EIsinore 983 1253 City of Moreno Valley City of Perris 1526 1854 City of Riverside 1837 2233 City of San Marcos Rancho Calif. Water Dist. Mean Survey Agencies 1423 1722 ~Median Survey Agencies 1525 1855 Merchants & Manufacturers ICity of Temecula 1424 1774 Page 3 tembud90.wkl CIty of Temecula - Proposed Salary Ranges - 06-Aug-90 Attachment ]- Exhibit A I. isled in Alohabetical Order # of Exempt/ Position8 Non-Ex. Proposed Title 1 NE 1 NE I E 3 NE 2 E I NE 1 E 2 NE 4 NE I E I E 1 E I E I E I E 1 E I E I E I E 2 NE 2 E 4 NE 1 NE 2 NE 2 E I NE I E 1 NE I NE 1 E 44 TO~I Account Clerk ACCOuntant Administrative Assistant Administrative Secretary Assistant City Manager Assistant Planner Assistant to the City Manager Associate Planner Building Inspector Chief AcCountant CiW Manager Deputy City Clerk Director of Building and Safety Director of Community Services Director of Finance Director of Planning Executive Secretary Information Services Manager Maintenance Supervisor Maintenance Worker Management Analyst Office Assistant Planning Technician Recreation Leader Recreation Supervisor Secretary Senior Accountant Senior Building InSpeCtor Senior Maintenance Worker Senior Planner Minimum Maximum 1,600 1,993 2,498 3,111 2,105 2,621 1,702 2,120 6,172 7.685 2,464 3,068 2,807 3,495 2,885 3,592 2,431 3,027 3,377 4,205 by City Council 2,414 3,006 5.236 6,519 5,236 6,519 5,236 6,519 5,236 6.519 2,285 2,846 4,148 5,165 3,331 4,148 1,667 2,076 2,731 3,393 1,303 1,624 2,193 2,731 1,424 1,774 2,533 3,154 1,454 1,811 2,788 3,471 2,675 3,331 1,926 2,398 3,424 4,236 temlist2.wkl CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: MTG: DEPT: TITLE: OEPT HD 8/14/90 CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5446 CiTY ATTY PLNG ORDINANCE NO. CiTY MGR Recommendation CONDUCT FIRST READING of Ordinance No. , Change of Zone No. 5~6 amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula from )-P (Industrial Park) to C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) on the west side of Ynez Road, north of Winchester Road and as further clarified in the exhibit. Backqround On June 6, 1990, the Temecula City Council conducted a Public Hearing and approved Change of Zone Application No. 5~6. The attached Ordinance Amendment implements the action that the City Council took on the date of the hearing. The Zone Change involved a parcel located at the west side of Ynez Road, north of Winchester Road. The application involved changing the existing I-P zone ( Industrial Park ) to C-P-S zone I Scenic Highway Commercial ). Staff is recommending that the City Council conduct a First Reading of the Ordinance to change the I-P zone to C-P-S zone. A Second Reading will be conducted at the next regular meeting of the Council. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 5446, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM I-P I INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO CPS {SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON 6.51 ACRES AT THE WEST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD. The City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Public hearings have been held before the Riverside County Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The applicable land use district as shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in affect the zone or zones as described in Change of Zone No. 5446 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 15 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. SECTION 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June Greek, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was duly and regularly introduced at a meeting o the City Council on the day of , 1989, and that thereafter the said ordinance was duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1989, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Temecula, California, this day of , 1989. City Clerk (seal) Adopted by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this __ day of , 19__. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form Mayor Approved as to Content City Attorney City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5elq6 .M-SC R-R t0 \ / M-SC( 'Z4,~48 \ CZ 4078 SUBJECT SITE ' '~Z 4077 /M-SC CZ 4607 Change of Zone from I-P (Industrial Park) to C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) on approximately 6.51 acres. Assessor Parcel No.: 910-200-059 Location: West side of Ynez Road, north of Winchester Road. CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGE OF ZONE NO. ,=~".5 © z~r i1,~ SUBJECT SITE LBOATIOIIAL i Change of Zone from I-P I Industrial Park) to C-P-S l Scenic Highway Commercial ) on approximately 6.51 acres. Assessor Parcel No.: 910-200-059 Location: West side of Ynez Road, north of Winchester Road. sff/AGD17161 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY AUGUST 6, 1990 AUGUST 14, 1990 PROCEDURES FOR ADOPTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 90-XX, which establishes procedures for approval of development agreements. DISCUSSION: The City Council recently approved an extension of the Subdivision Map for TPM 21383 (Johnson and Johnson) subject to the adoption of a development agreement imposing various conditions on the project. Before the City Council may consider such an agreement, state law requires that the Council adopt procedures for considering development agreements. The attached resolution would adopt such procedures. If this resolution is approved, it is anticipated that the development agreement would be negotiated between Johnson and Johnson and City Staff and would be brought for City Council consideration at a public hearing for the August 28, 1990 meeting. -1- sff/RES17162 RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the State Legislature has authorized the City to enter into development agreements which provide greater certainty to developers to proceed with approved projects according to local policies and regulations; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65867 requires a public hearing before the planning agency and the legislative body prior to the adoption of a development agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to implement this authorization in an efficient and equitable manner by providing processing procedures for development agreements; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. As a policy, development agreements should include public benefit(s), beyond those already forthcoming through project approvals, in return for commitments to maintain present plans and regulations for determinate periods. SECTION 2. The City Council is hereby designated as the planning agency for purposes of Government Code Section 65867. SECTION 3. The following procedures are approved: A. Application. 1. Consideration of a development agreement (Article 2.5, Chapter 4, Title 7 of the Government Code, beginning with Section 65864) shall be initiated by the property owner ("OWNER") filing an application for such consideration with the Director of Planning ("Director"). The application shall include: -1- sff/RES17162 (a) A proposed agreement which conforms to the form approved by the City Attorney and shall include the following: (i) A legal description of the property sought to be covered by the agreement. (ii) A description of the proposed uses, height and size of buildings, density or intensity of use, and provision for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. (iii) Conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent City discre- tionary actions. (iv) Proposed time when construction would be commenced and completed, including a phasing plan. (v) Proposed public benefits inclu- sive of an implementation phasing plan. (vi) Termination date for the agreement, not to exceed ten (10) years from the date of execution. (b) Sufficient information to enable the Director to perform an initial study pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21160. (c) Sufficient information to establish that the project is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan. (d) Such other information as the Director may require. 2. The application shall be accompanied by a $4,000 deposit fee to cover processing costs. Additional funds may be requested. Any overage shall be refunded subsequent to adoption of the agreement or upon termination of the application. B. Recommendation and Transmittal. The Director shall, in accordance with adopted City procedures for implementation of CEQA, prepare appropriate environmental documentation and, upon completion of such documentation, shall transmit the application, -2- sff/RES17162 together with the Director's report on adequacy of existing plans and regulations, and proposed public benefit(s) to balance development commitments; and why such benefit(s) is/are adequate to the City Council. C. City Council Action. 1. Upn receipt of the application, environ- mental documentation and Director's report, the City Clerk shall schedule a public hearing on the application. The hearing shall be preceded by public notice given in the same manner as for a zone change. 2. Following the public hearing, the Council may approve, disapprove, or approve as modified by the Council the application and, if approved or approved as modified, adopt an ordinance approving the agreement and may execute said agreement on behalf of the City. Said agree- ment shall not become effective prior to execution by the Mayor. 3. No agreement shall be executed by the City until it has been executed by the applicant. If the applicant has not executed the agreement, or agreement as modified by the City Council, and returned said executed agreement to the City for execution within thirty (30) days of Council approval, said application shall be deemed withdrawn and the agreement shall not be executed by the City. 4. Within ten (10) days after the City executes a development agreement, the City Clerk shall cause a copy thereof to be recorded. D. Annual Review. 1. All development projects subject to the agreement shall be reviewed by the Director once every twelve months concurrent with OWNER's submittal of an Annual Monitoring Report. 2. The purpose of the review shall be to inquire into the good faith compliance of the OWNER with the terms of the agreement and any other matters which may be specified in said agreement. 3. Prior to each review, the OWNER shall file a report with the Director as to development which has occurred under the agreement subsequent to the last past review and any other matters which the OWNER wishes to bring -3- sff/RES17162 to the Director's attention. 4. If, following a review of an agreement, it is determined by the City Council that the agreement should be terminated or modified, the matter shall be set by Director for public hearing by the Planning Commission and transmitted to the City Council for proceedings for termination or modification. E. Termination, Cancellation, Modification and Amendment of Development Agreements. 1. Any development agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the OWNER and the City Council or cancelled by the City Council in the same manner as set forth above for entering into such agreement. 2. If as a result of a periodic review it finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the OWNER or successor in interest has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the agreement, the City Council may terminate or modify the agreement. SECTION 4. this Resolution. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this , 1990. day of RON PARKS MAYOR -4- sff/RES I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS DAVID DIXON CITY CLERK -5- 88/10/90 10~09 ~ ?147555648 BWS O~ 0~ sff/AGD10019 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM DATE: MEETING DATE SUBJECT= CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCILRN~ SCOTT F. FIELD, ClT~ ATTO D DOUG STEWART, DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER AUGUST 9, 1990 AUGUST 14, 1990 FLOOD CONTROL AGREEMENT FOR MESA HOMES; TRACTS 24131, 24132, 24133, 24124 AND 24135, LOCATED NORTH OF MARGARITA AND EAST OF PABA ROAD RECOMMENDRTIO~= That the City Council: (1) approve the Flood Control Agreement between Mesa Homes, the Riverside County Flood Control District, and the City of Tamscala; (2) approve the Memorandum of Understanding between Mesa Homes and the City of Tamscala; and (3) authorize the Mayor to execute the same. DISCUSSION: The Riverside County Flood Control District operates all flood control improvements of 36 inches or more. Pursuant to its existing practice and procedure, the District requires that before any flood control improvements are installed, the developer must enter into the attached agreement with the District providing for payment of inspection fees, and a fee to cover operations and maintenance of the improvements for a fixed number of years. once the operations and maintenance fee is exhausted, an assessment on the property will pay for the operation and maintenance of the improvements. Concurrently with the installation of the flood control improvements provided for under the enclosed Agreement for Tracts 24131 through 24135, the developer will also be installing various flood control inlets and connectors. These facilities will be less than 36 inches and the responsibility of the City. Consequently, it is necessary that the City also enter into this Agreement. -1- 08/10/98 10:10 ~ 7147555648 BWS OC 0~ ~ff/AGDiO019 The improvements to be owned and operated by the City will also be covered by a Subdivision Improvement Agreement which will be executed between the City and the developer at the time of approval of the final maps. Among other things, this Subdivision Agreement will provide that the developer will warranty and maintain =~e City improvements for the first year after their dedication. However, because a Subdivision Agreement does not yet exist for these Tracts, the attached Memorandum o2 Understanding between the City and Mesa Momes provides that Mesa Homes will maintain and warranty the City improvements for their first year consistent with the Subdivision Agreement, which will be executed between the City and Mesa Homes at the time of approval of the Final Map. In conclusion, it is recommended that the city approve the attached Agreements, and authorize the Mayor to sign them. -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AGREEMENT The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRICT", the CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called CITY, and BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a California corporation, hereinafter called "DEVELOPER", hereby agree as follows: RECITALS A. DEVELOPER has submitted for approval Tract No. 24131, Tract No. 24132, Tract No. 24133, Tract No. 24134 and Tract No. 24135, hereinafter collectively called "TRACTS", within the City of Temecula in western Riverside County, and as a condition for approval of TRACTS, DEVELOPER must construct certain flood control facilities in order to provide flood protection for DEVELOPER'S planned development; and B. The required facilities include several underground concrete pipe storm drain systems, hereinafter called "STORM DRAINS", as shown in red on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and C. DEVELOPER desires DISTRICT to assume ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS. Therefore, DISTRICT must review and approve the plans and specifications and subsequently inspect the construction of STORM DRAINS; and D. DISTRICT is willing to review and approve plans and specifications prepared by DEVELOPER for STORM DRAINS, and is willing to inspect the construction of STORM DRAINS; and E. DISTRICT is willing to assume ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, - 1 - t 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 excluding all STORM DRAINS inlets and connector pipes within CITY street rights of way, provided (i) DEVELOPER complies with this agreement, (ii) DEVELOPER deposits with DISTRICT the amount specified herein to cover DISTRICT'S construction inspection costs for STORM DRAINS, (iii) DEVELOPER pays DISTRICT the amount specified herein to cover DISTRICT'S operation and maintenance costs for STORM DRAINS, (iv) STORM DRAINS are constructed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by DISTRICT, and (v) DEVELOPER obtains and conveys to DISTRICT the necessary rights of way as set forth herein for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, including ingress and egress; and F. CITY is willing (i) to accept and hold faithful performance and payment bonds submitted by DEVELOPER for STORM DRAINS, (ii) to consent to the recording of Irrevocable Offers of Dedication furnished by DEVELOPER as provided herein, (iii) to grant DISTRICT the right to operate and maintain STORM DRAINS within CITY rights of way, and (iv) to accept responsibility for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS inlets and connector pipes within CITY rights of way, provided STORM DRAINS are constructed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by DISTRICT and CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: SECTION I DEVELOPER shall: 1. Prepare plans and specifications for STORM DRAINS in accordance with DISTRICT standards, and submit the plans and specifications to DISTRICT for its review and approval. - 2 - 1 2 4 5 6 '7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2. Deposit with DISTRICT the sum of $69,000.00, the estimated cost of providing construction inspection for STORM DRAINS, at the time of providing written notification of the start of construction as set forth in Section 1.6. herein. 3. Pay DISTRICT (Zone 7 Maintenance Trust Fund No. 732-64-950-3211), upon execution of this agreement, the one time cash sum of $49,100.00, the agreed upon DISTRICT estimated cost for operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS through the year 1998. 4. Secure all necessary licenses, permits and rights of entry as may be needed for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, including, but not limited to, encroachment permit(s) or grant(s) of easement as may !be required from CITY for the construction, inspection, operation 14 L .! and maintenance of those portions of STORM DRAINS located on or within CITY rights of way. DEVELOPER shall furnish DISTRICT, at 16 'the time of providing written notification to DISTRICT of the 17 start of construction as set forth in Section 1.6. herein, or not 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 less than 10 days prior to recordation of the final map for any of TRACTS, or any phases thereof, whichever occurs first, with sufficient evidence of DEVELOPER having secured such necessary licenses, permits and rights of entry, as determined and approved by DISTRICT. 5. Provide CITY, at the time of providing written notification to DISTRICT of the start of construction as set forth in Section 1.6. herein, or prior to recordation of the final map for any of TRACTS, or any phases thereof, whichever occurs first, with faithful performance and payment bonds, each - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the amount of 100% of the estimated cost for construction of STORM DRAINS as determined by DISTRICT. The surety, amount and form of the bonds shall be subject to the approval of DISTRICT and CITY. The bonds shall remain in full force and effect until STORM DRAINS are accepted for operation and maintenance by DISTRICT as set forth in Section II.4. herein~ at which time the bond amount may be reduced to 10% for a period of one year to guarantee against any defective work, labor or materials. 6. Notify DISTRICT in writing (Attention - Michael D. Rawson), at least twenty (20) days prior to the start of construction of any element of STORM DRAINS. 7. Obtain and provide DISTRICT, at the time of providing written notification to DISTRICT of the start of construction of STORM DRAINS as set forth in Section 1.6., or not less than ten (10) days prior to recordation of the final map for any of TRACTS, or any phases thereof, whichever occurs first, with duly executed Irrevocable Offers of Dedication of easements to the public for flood control and drainage purposes, including ingress and egress, for the rights of way deemed necessary by DISTRICT for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, as shown in concept cross-hatched in red on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Irrevocable Offers of Dedication shall be in a form approved by DISTRICT and shall be executed by all legal and equitable owners of the property described in the offer. 8. Furnish DISTRICT when submitting the Irrevocable Offers of Dedication, with Preliminary Reports on Title,. dated no - 4 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 more than thirty (30) days prior to date of submission for all the property described in the Irrevocable Offers of Dedication. 9. Construct, or cause to be constructed, STORM DRAINS at DEVELOPER'S sole cost and expense in accordance with plans and specifications approved by DISTRICT. 10. Upon completion of construction of STORM DRAINS, and upon acceptance of all "on site" street rights of way by CITY as deemed necessary by DISTRICT and CITY for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, but not until immediately prior to DISTRICT acceptance of STORM DRAINS for operation and maintenance as set forth in Section II.5. herein, convey or cause to be conveyed to DISTRICT, flood control easements, including ingress and egress, in a form approved by DISTRICT, for all pertinent rights of way deemed necessary by DISTRICT for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, as shown in concept cross-hatched in red and cross-hatched in blue on Exhibit "B". 11. At the time of recordation of the conveyancing documents described in Section 1.10., furnish DISTRICT with policies of title insurance, each in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) for each parcel to be conveyed to DISTRICT, guaranteeing DISTRICT'S interest in said property as being free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, assessments, easements, taxes and leases (recorded and unrecorded), except the Irrevocable Offers of Dedication described in Section 1.7., and except those which, in the sole discretion of DISTRICT, are acceptable. 12. Assume sole ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, until such time that - 5 - 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STORM DRAINS ownership is accepted by DISTRICT as set forth in Section II.5. herein. 13. Pay, if suit is brought upon this contract or any bond guaranteeing the completion of STORM DRAINS, all costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, and acknowledge that, upon entry of judgment, all such costs, expenses and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. 14. Furnish DISTRICT with the final mylar plans for STORM DRAINS and assign their ownership to DISTRICT. SECTION II DISTRICT shall: 1. Review and approve plans and specifications prepared by DEVELOPER for STORM DRAINS, prior to the start of construction. 2. Record, or cause to be recorded, the Irrevocable Offers of Dedication provided by DEVELOPER pursuant to Section 1.7. 3. Upon execution of this agreement, record or cause to be recorded, a copy of this agreement in the Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder. 4. Inspect the construction of STORM DRAINS. 5. Accept ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, excluding inlets and connector pipes within CITY street rights of way, upon (a) DISTRICT acceptance of the construction of STORM DRAINS as being complete, (b) recordation of the conveyancing documents ~escribed in Section 1.10., (c) completion of construction of all - 6 - 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 surrounding street improvements required as conditions for approval of TRACTS, and phases thereof, as determined and deemed necessary by DISTRICT, and (d) DEVELOPER'S completion, at DEVELOPER'S sole cost and expense, of all STORM DRAINS repair and/or maintenance work as may be determined necessary by DISTRICT, including, but not necessarily limited to, removal of accumulated debris. 6. Keep an accurate accounting of all DISTRICT construction inspection costs, and within thirty (30) days after DISTRICT acceptance of STORM DRAINS construction as being complete, submit a cost statement to DEVELOPER. If inspection costs exceed the deposit as set forth herein, DEVELOPER shall pay the additional amount upon demand by DISTRICT. If the deposit exceeds said inspection costs, DISTRICT shall reimburse DEVELOPER the excess amount within forty-five (45) days after DISTRICT acceptance of STORM DRAINS construction as being complete. 7. Provide CITY with "as-built" mylar plans for all STORM DRAINS facilities constructed within CITY rights of way, upon DISTRICT acceptance of STORM DRAINS as complete. SECTION III CITY shall: 1. Review and approve plans and specifications prepared by DEVELOPER for those portions of STORM DRAINS within CITY rights of way, prior to the start of construction of STORM DRAINS. 2. Accept the CITY and DISTRICT approved faithful performance and payments bonds submitted by DEVELOPER as set forth in Section 1.5., and hold said bonds as provided herein. - 7 - 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Consent to the recording of any Irrevocable Offer of Dedication furnished by DEVELOPER pursuant to this agreement. 4. If requested by DISTRICT, accept the Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication as set forth herein, and any other outstanding offers of dedication necessary for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS, and convey sufficient rights of way to DISTRICT to allow DISTRICT to construct, operate and maintain STORM DRAINS as provided herein. 5. Grant DISTRICT, by execution of this agreement, the right to construct, inspect, operate and maintain STORM DRAINS within CITY rights of way as set forth herein. 6. Not grant any occupancy permits for any dwelling unit within TRACTS, as shown in orange on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof, until construction of STORM DRAINS is complete, unless otherwise approved in writing by DISTRICT. SECTION IV It is further mutually agreed: 1. All work involved with STORM DRAINS shall be inspected by DISTRICT and shall not be deemed complete until approved and accepted as complete by DISTRICT. 2. CITY and DEVELOPER personnel may observe and inspect all work being done on STORM DRAINS, but shall provide any comments to DISTRICT personnel who shall be responsible for all quality control communications with the contractor during the construction of STORM DRAINS. 3. Construction of STORM DRAINS shall be completed by DEVELOPER within twelve (12) consecutive months after execution of this agreement and within two hundred ten (210) consecutive - 8 - 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 i, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 calendar days after commencing work on STORM DRAINS. It is expressly understood that since time is of the essence in this agreement, failure of DEVELOPER to perform the work within the agreed upon time shall constitute authority for DISTRICT to perform the remaining work and require DEVELOPER'S surety to pay to CITY the penal sum of any and all bonds. In which case, CITY shall subsequently reimburse DISTRICT for DISTRICT costs incurred, and any excess shall be returned to DEVELOPER. 4. DISTRICT assumes no responsibility, whatsoever, for surface drainage upon those easement areas within TRACTS as shown in concept cross-hatched in blue on attached Exhibit "B". 5. DISTRICT shall assume no responsibility, whatsoever, for the repair or replacement of any improvements constructed within the rights of way shown in concept cross-hatched in red and in concept cross-hatched in blue on Exhibit "B", including, but not limited to, paving, fences or landscaping features which may become damaged, destroyed or removed as a result of DISTRICT maintenance, repair or reconstruction of STORM DRAINS. DISTRICT shall exercise reasonable care to minimize damage to such improvements in connection with maintenance, repair and reconstruction of STORM DRAINS. 6. DEVELOPER and DISTRICT, knowingly and voluntarily, waive the provisions of Government Code Section 65913.8, relating to fees and charges. Such waiver is accomplished with the understanding that DISTRICT is voluntarily undertaking the obligation to accept ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of STORM DRAINS as set forth herein, - 9 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28t and DEVELOPER is not required by DISTRICT to enter into this agreement. 7. DEVELOPER shall, during the construction period, provide Workers' Compensation Insurance in an amount required by law. A certificate of said insurance policy shall be provided to DISTRICT and CITY at the time of providing notice pursuant to Section 1.6. 8. DEVELOPER shall, commencing on the date notice is given pursuant to Section 1.6., and continuing until DISTRICT accepts STORM DRAINS for operation and maintenance: (a) Provide and maintain comprehensive liability insurance coverage which shall protect DEVELOPER from claim from damages for personal injury, including accidental and wrongful death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from DEVELOPER'S construction of STORM DRAINS or the performance of its obligations hereunder, whether such construction or performance be by DEVELOPER, by any of its contractors, subcontractors, or by anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them. Such insurance shall name DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside as additional insureds with respect to this agreement and the obligations of DEVELOPER hereunder. Such insurance shall provide for limits of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence. - 10 - 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 28 (b) Cause its insurance carrier(s) to furnish DISTRICT and CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the start of construction, with certificate(s) of insurance showing that such insurance is in full force and effect and that DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside are named as additional insureds with respect to this agreement and the obligations of DEVELOPER hereunder. Further, said certificate(s) shall provide that the issuing company shall give DISTRICT and CITY sixty (60) days written notice in the event of any cancellation, termination, non-renewal or reduction in coverage of the policies evidenced by the certificate(s). In the event of any such cancellation, termination, non-renewal or reduction in coverage, DEVELOPER shall, forthwith, secure replacement insurance meeting the provision of this paragraph. Failure to maintain the insurance required by this paragraph shall be deemed a material breach of this agreement and shall authorize and constitute authority for DISTRICT, at its sole discretion, to proceed to perform the remaining work pursuant to Section IV.3. 9. In the event that any claim or legal action is brought against DISTRICT, CITY or the County of Riverside in connection with this agreement because of the actual or alleged acts or omissions by DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER shall defend, indemnify - 11 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9i 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and hold DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside harmless therefrom, without cost to DISTRICT, CITY or the County of Riverside. Upon DEVELOPER'S failure to do so, DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside shall be entitled to recover from DEVELOPER all of their cost and expenses, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees. 10. DEVELOPER shall defend, indemnify and hold DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside, their respective officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any claim or legal action whatsoever, based or asserted, pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage whatsoever, for the design, construction or failure of STORM DRAINS or from the diversion of the waters from the natural drainage patterns, save and except claims and litigation arising through the joint or sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of DISTRICT, CITY or the County of Riverside, with contribution among DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside to be pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6. DEVELOPER shall defend DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside without cost to DISTRICT, CITY or County of Riverside, and upon DEVELOPER'S failure to do so, DISTRICT, CITY and County of Riverside shall be entitled to recover from DEVELOPER all of their cost and expenditures, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees. 11. DEVELOPER for itself, its successors and assigns hereby releases DISTRICT, CITY and the County of Riverside, their - 12 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 respective officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, or suits of any kind arising out of any liability, known or unknown, present or future, including, but not limited to, any claim or liability, based or asserted, pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage, whatsoever, for the design, construction or failure of STORM DRAINS, or the discharge of drainage within or from STORM DRAINS. Nothing contained herein shall constitute a release by DEVELOPER of DISTRICT, CITY or the County of Riverside, their officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions or suits of any kind arising out of any liability, known or unknown, present or future, for the negligent maintenance of STORM DRAINS after their acceptance by DISTRICT. 12. Any waiver by DISTRICT or by CITY of any breach of any one or more of the terms of this agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other breach of the same or of any other term hereof. Failure on the part of DISTRICT or CITY to require exact, full and complete compliance with any terms of this agreement shall not be construed as in any manner changing the terms hereof, or estopping DISTRICT or CITY from enforcement hereof. 13. If any provision in this agreement (with the exception of Section IV.6.) is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. Should it be held by a court - 13 - 1 4 5 6 '7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 28 of competent jurisdiction that any portion of Section IV.6. is invalid, void or unenforceable, the provisions of Government Code 65913.8(b) shall apply. It shall, therefore, be determined that this fee is extended through the year 1998. 14. This agreement is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 15. Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the parties of this agreement will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CITY OF TEMECULA AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 43172 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 1033 Temecula, CA 92390 Riverside, CA 92502-1033 BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 28765 Single Oak Drive Suite 100 Temecula, CA 92390 16. Any action at law or in equity brought by any of the parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by the agreement, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venus in such proceedings to any other county. 18. This agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this agreement was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this agreement - 14 - 1 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this agreement in its final form. 19. The rights and obligations of DEVELOPER shall inure to and be binding upon all heirs, successors and assignees. 20. DEVELOPER shall not assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights, duties or obligations hereunder to any person or entity without the written consent of the other parties hereto being first obtained, and such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In the event of any such transfer or assignment, DEVELOPER expressly understands and agrees that it shall remain liable with respect to any and all of the obligations and duties contained in this agreement. 21. This agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. This agreement may be changed or modified only upon the written consent of the parties hereto. // // // - 15 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on · (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT KENNETH L. EDWARDS Chief Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel Deputy Dated ~ { ~ [~ O APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) CITY OF TEMECULA By Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a California Corporation By Title By Title (NOTARY) JMB:pln agrmt479 - 16 - ]. ,?, 4 6 9 10 1,?, 13 14 20 2:]. 24 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the par~ies hereto have executed this agreement on · (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT KENNETH L. EDWARDS Chief Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By By Deputy Deputy Dated (SEAL) A~PROVEDAS TO FORM: By ~. City Attorney Dated ~' 2- ~d CITY OF TEMECULA By Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, · California Corpor~ Title ~J. P. Title (N~ARY) JMB:pln agrmt479 - 16 - o o STATE OF CALIFORNIA Rivers ide COUNTY OF On July 30, 1990 said State, personally appeared Donald Dennis Kla, mmek }ss. , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for Lorenz " and , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument as Vice President and ///////////Secretary, onbehalfof Development Company Bedford the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its beard of directors. WIT~IESS my hand and official seal. Cr'his area for official notarial seal) zZ l gN ~'-~NOV ~'g 7 ~Z '~'V~]~''; O0 0~. 2) " ' I '3rid / / / ! / · 0.~ AC~'& t4~T EXHIBIT B I ~ ,"V {,o l ~o~. L/I I z /':/.="i. I \ \ ,,, .... \ II. L~O' · I · · . -,,, ,. ,... :. / ,.:.%'5 - ..'<:: z I I I I I I UNIOH ~'CHOOL DISTI~ICT PIfOPERTYL .,,. PER /Iv',~T. N9 3Z440D~ O.~'. ('teEC. N- IZ- EXHIBIT Et */ \\ / H ~,tt,tt.~O 00'0~ 'C ~ t z~ '/?"ZO.,~/ ,::%~o9--,. ~ i Z Ot\r I3 VI,.-,-fJ_ 8 .LilEIIHX:t / / / / / / ,ZZ 7Z-'7~ .OS,21-'F. Ifg~F 331t"'Jg N~dO NOYtl/f03 I..,'TN DY '~f 7 ' ~1 N, OGL~eE~N,J~,~ ,1~'8'9Z ~ I 19"O0,O0.O~N ' l ,~,. ~ C ; 8 .,r l'i-.7 l~ ~:] ~ ,"', 7B3~'Vd o. "~."." ~ ~~ ' . . "~/' ': ' IfJ'~rF ..~::)~clg N~dO NOPlllf03 ..'~ ' ~' ,/,~ ,:,,,..,z~.9,~eN ,~;oo/ ~ oazt. ~'eN..~ ,i~'RS:Z :.!~" · ' -4, ~ .&.~,y" 2 EXHIBIT B -1"" X hi CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS CSD BUSINESS A GENDA TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT A REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 14, 1990 PM Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 1.2 1.3 Approve the minutes of July 23, 1990 as mailed. Approve the minutes of July 24, 1990 as mailed. Approve the minutes of July 31, 1990 as mailed. 2 3 Sports Complex Maintenance - CSA 143 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve agreement for landscape service with Dennis Reeve and authorize the President to execute the same. Landscape Maintenance Services - Ridegview RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve agreement .for landscape service with California Landscape and authorize the President to execute the same. andscape Maintenance Services - Winchester Creek and Winchester Collection 5 6 7 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve agreement for landscape service with MacKenzie Landscape and authorize the President to execute the same. ! andscape Maintenance Services - The Summit. Costain Homes. Vineyards and Woodcrest. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve agreement for landscape service with East Bros. and authorize the President to execute the same. Annexation to TCSD-Zone A - Parcel Map 21592 Tomond Properties RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve annexation. Annexation to TCSD-Zone A - Parcel MaD 23335 Bedford Development Co. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve annexation 8 9 Encroachment Permit - Tract 22593 - Rancho Solano RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve encroachment permit for Tract process of dedication. 22593 to complete Annexation to TCSD-Zone A - Tracts 23299 & 23267 Presley of San Diego RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve annexation. 10 Annexation to TCSD-Zone A - Tract :~3195 Ran0ac Engineering RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve annexation. MANAGERS REPORT D/RECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: August 28, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD JULY 23, 1990 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 5:07 PM in the Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, California. President Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Attorney Doug Holland, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None were offered at this time. DISTRICT BUSINESS 1. TCSD Rates and Charges City Manager Dixon explained the purpose of this study session and introduced the staff report by Bill Holley. Mr. Holley explained the procedure that the Board should follow to conduct the public hearing on the TCSD Rates and Charges. He introduced Mr. Rob Brown of Willdan Associates who has been doing the assessment engineering for the rates and charges. A number of concerns were brought to light by the board members regarding specific assessments and the land use codes assigned to the parcels. Director Munoz suggested that the Board of Directors identify specific criteria to be used when dealing with appeals that are filed with the City on the proposed assessments. President Birdsall asked that staff prepare a guide to the procedures for the specific conduct of this hearing and a reminder of the announcements to be made to the public. Hi nutes\7~23\90 - 1 - 07/27/c)0 Director Parks asked that staff have available extra copies of the appeal procedure along with the Appeal Forms that the property owners will be asked to fill out if they wish to appeal their assessment. CITY MANAGER REPORTS None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 6:53 PM to a meeting to be held at 8:00 PM, Tuesday, July 24, 1990, at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR ATTEST: JUNE S. GREEK, DEPUTY CITY CLERK N i nutes\7~2] \90 - 2 - 07/27/90 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD JULY 24, 1990 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:20 PM., President Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks Birdsall ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk. CSD BUSINESS 1. Minutes It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to approved the minutes of July 1 O, 1990 as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks, Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None 2. Temecula Community Services Rates and Char~le$ President Birdsall asked if all notices have been posted as required by law. Deputy City Clerk June Greek stated notice has been published and posted in four places as well as mailed to all property owners. President Birdsall stated all citizens will have an opportunity to ask questions and voice their opinion. She explained the manner in which this would occur. Staff will first give an explanation of the assessment district, a break will then be given to allow citizens to fill out "request to speak" forms, and everyone desiring to speak would be heard. 4\CSDMIlq\072490 - 1 - 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24, 1990 City Attorney Fields explained that State Law establishes certain procedures for parks and recreation fees and charges. He stated mailed notices must be sent and a public hearing held. Tonight is the time for the public hearing in which all interested persons will have the opportunity to speak. Mr. Fields stated that the County has established similar rates and charges, however they did not have a requirement to give property owners notice, or hold a public hearing to give citizens an opportunity to be heard. Bill Holley, Parks and Recreation Consultant, stated this has been a process, developed over a number of months, to help create a parks and recreation program and to maintain previously provided services. He reported the Temecula Community Services District was voted upon at the time of incorporation November 7, 1989 and officially began on December 1, 1989. He stated the purpose of the District is to assume the duties and responsibilities previously provided by County of Riverside through various County Service Areas (CSA's). Mr. Holley explained the TCSD service program proposed for fiscal 1990-91 is in two parts. First, a City-wide program, generally described as a Parks, Recreation and Community Services program, in which all property owners in the City are assessed; and second, a Zone-of-Benefit program, whereby parcel owners within a Zone-of Benefit are charged for services received, such as slope maintenance and/or street lighting. He explained the charges were determined by spreading the proposed budget of $1,564,838 among 9,868 parcels of varying sizes and land uses. He explained this budget would provide for the development of a comprehensive Master Plan for Parks and Recreation facilities for the City; the operation and maintenance of public parks and recreation programs, capital improvements within public park and recreation facilities; and the administration of these services. Mr. Holley emphasized that the zone charges are a direct continuation of previously existing programs by the County of Riverside, (CSA). City Attorney Fields indicated that a number of citizens have contacted the City indicating their property was not classified correctly, and these will be corrected. He stated citizens may wish to fill out an appeal form, available in the back of the room, to voice such complaints. He also stated citizens will have up to 30 days after taxes are due to file an appeal. He stated the various classifications for appeal. They are as follows: 4\CSDMIN\072490 -2- 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24, 1990 Misclassification - this is for properties with improper land use classifications, for example zoned commercial instead of residential. Hardship - this classification covers persons on fixed incomes who are unable to pay charges and provide the necessities of life. The charges in this case may be deferred. RECESS President Birdsall called a recess at 8:50 PM to allow citizens to submit a request to speak form to the City Clerk. The meeting was reconvened at 9:10 PM. President Birdsall reminded speakers to limit their comments to three minutes. She stated those speaking in opposition would go first, following by those speaking in favor. Marsha Slavin, 30110 La Primavera, representing Lake Village Community Association, spoke in opposition to the assessment for the common park areas owned by the association. She stated these areas are completely maintained by the association and should not be further assessed. She stated this property was zoned commercial/industrial and it is not commercial. It does not fall into any of the land use categories correctly. President Birdsall suggested filing an appeal on behalf of all members of the association. Steve Corona, 29926 Corte Tolono, stated he owns a 20 acre parcel where he operates an onion packing house, and a small fruit stand. He requested this property not be assessed since he feels no benefit from parks will be gained by his property. Vern McCarty, 29753 Via Chacras, stated the zone assessment for his area has increased 255 percent above actual cost. He questioned how this assessment is determined. He asked if each project is truthfully analyzed and assessed. City Manager Dixon requested Mr. McCarty fill out an appeal and the zone assessments would be investigated. Director Parks pointed out that on previously tax bills if citizens received a charge for CSA-143, CSA-103 or CSA-75, those charges will not appear separately on the 1990o91 property tax bill. Only a TCSD charge will appear, which will include the zone change and the district change. John Dedovesh, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, asked since CSA has already collected for 4\CSDMIN~072490 -3 - 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24, 1990 trash pick-up, how will the refund be handled? Second, he stated he did not feel that any portion of CSD assessment should be used for Sports Park lighting until there are sufficient parks on the other side of the City. Bob Pipher, 41825 Green Tree Road, stated he did not like the size of the assessment and had two concerns. One, the City does not have sufficient parks spread throughout the City and two, additional Sports Park lights would be very disturbing to adjoining properties. David Michael, 30300 Churchill Ct, asked several questions as follows: 1. Since, the County of Riverside was responsible for the collection of monies or land from developers and the Council hired a consultant to help in locating these assets for Temecula, what has been accomplished to date? 2. What inquiries have been made by the City Council, the County Supervisor or press as to what monies and/or lands have been collected County-wide from any developer in the last three years? Has any developer been contacted? 3. Has the District Attorney been questioned regarding an investigation into possible corruption on the part of developers, county employees or elected officials if no monies were collected? 4. Have the people responsible for collecting fees and/or lands from developers been reprimanded or terminated for this failure? He stated there are two members of the Board of Supervisors who represent Temecula and it appears they lacked personal involvement in protecting the interest of property owners prior to the area becoming a city. This would include police and fire protection, traffic safety and adequate schools and parks. He asked if any Councilmember or the press has asked these supervisors for answers. If not, the press and Council should demand an accounting of their past performance so it is part of the record. Hershel Gray, 31130 General Kerney Rd., Manager of Heritage Mobile Home Estates, stated the assessment amount for the mobile home park is based on commercial/industrial when the zoning for the park is R/R. He stated the mobile home park is home to many senior citizens. He stated many amenities are available at the park, for example landscape areas, clubhouse, pool, etc. He said the residents will not be using City parks and should be exempt from assessments. President Birdsall stated the landuse classification is incorrect, and this assessment is to the property owner, not the residents of the mobile home park. Mr. Gray stated 4\CSDMIN\072490 4 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24, 1990 that the resident's lease states additional assessments may be passed through to residents. President Birdsall said senior citizens do use the Senior Citizen's facilities in this area. She said a part of the proposed fees will be used to fund the Senior Citizen Center. Director Mu~oz stated this may be a category where those individuals who are on fixed income may file a hardship appeal, and have this assessment deferred. Brian Sampson, 40655 Calle Medusa, raised several questions as follows: 1. Who developed the 1990-91 Budget? 2. Why is park maintenance so high - over $250,000? Is the City looking at alternative contractors to care for the grounds or will it hire City staff. 3. Why does administration and overhead account of 34% of budget. 4. What are the findings of the consultant hired to uncover developers fees paid to the County? 5. What changes are being made to insure more public parks in the future? Most of the parks proposed in the near future are in private master planned communities. Zones of Benefit 1. The sub zones were created by the County - as conditions change, should zone boundaries be adjusted. What establishes the costs of each zone? Is the work performed by outside contractors? Why are some areas of the City outside all zones? Why didn't the City's notices identify which zone the property falls into? Shouldn't potential homeowners be made aware that this proposed property is inside a particular zone? Director Parks clarified how the budgets were prepared. He stated the City took information provided by the consultant and CSA-143. The City hired the County to 4\CSDMIN\072490 -5- 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24. 1990 act on behalf of the City until the City can take over this operation. He said if these numbers are incorrect, they will be adjusted next year. Director Mu~oz stated that the trash collection fee would be a credit on the tax bill instead of a cash refund. Bill Holley stated that in each of the zones where a refuse charge has been collected, those monies collected will be credited back to the zones of benefit. President Birdsall called a one minute break at 9:41 PM to change the tape. The meeting was resumed at 9:42 PM. Greg LeBlanc, 39843 Amberley Circle, asked the following questions. "What is the highest assessment?" "When will the maintenance begin, and what changes will occur for the money collected?" He asked, "if the assessment fee is likely to increase or will it decrease with the number of people moving into the area? What determines the boundaries for these zones? If the money allocated for maintenance was not spent, will this money be rolled over to next year's budget, or will it be absorbed into the City budget for other purposes?" President Birdsall stated that the CSD budget is separate from the City budget and the two do not intermingle. Edward Doran, 39985 Stamos Court, asked if the City has adopted a Quimby Ordinance? He asked what progress has been made by the consultant hired to look into these fees. He asked if the reported 120 acres of park lands exist, or if fees were collected. Mr. Doran asked why there is no provision in this plan for acquisition of parks. He asked if a developer providing a private park for the residents of his development satisfy Quimby. He stated this City needs neighborhood parks as well as Sports Park. President Birdsall stated $2,000,000 is available for acquisition of land through a Mello Roos District. For this reason, the budget was not increased to include acquisition. She stated the City does not have the report from Consultant John McTighe at this point, but it is forthcoming. Mr. Doran asked that if a Parks Director, at an annual salary of $66,000/year is to be hired, a resident of Temecula be chosen for the position. Director Mu~oz stated that the City has adopted the County Quimby Ordinance. He said that as of July 1, 1990, the City has been collecting these fees. Director Parks reported that a jurisdiction must have a master plan for parks before Quimby Fees can be collected. He said CSA-143 failed to establish a master plan, so 4\CSDMIN\072490 -6- 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24, 1990 the County Planning Department did not collect these fees. They did require developers to develop parks within some sub-divisions as part of the specific plans, but no fees or land under the Quimby Act were collected. Mr. Holley stated that as of last month, no dollars were collected under the Quimby Ordinance. Doug Blois, 30350 Tradewater, asked that lights not be installed in the Sports Park, but instead neighborhood parks should be built. He stated these lights would mainly benefit adult sports. President Birdsall stated the fields would be lighted to provide an opportunity for adult use at night, freeing the park for the children during the day. Director Lindemans stated the Little League is one of the main groups asking that the Sports Park be lighted. Richard L. Busenkell, 30946 Shaba Circle, representing Wolf Valley Homeowners Association, addressed the riparian land the homeowners association holds in common. He stated no walls surround this area so everyone is free to enjoy this area. He asked this be excluded from tax roles, as it benefits the community as open space and can never be developed to generate income. Bob Altshaler, 7173 El Poste Drive, Buena Park, asked that when assessments are levied in the future the assessment be coded so the property owner knows exactly what categories they fall into. He asked how the costs per acre calculated? He also asked if the budget parks and recreation would be on target. Director Parks answered a single family residence was established at one dwelling unit, apartments at 3/4 dwelling unit, vacant residential at 2 dwelling units per acre, commercial/industrial is 6 units for developed and 4 units for undeveloped. Mr. Altshaler asked how the basic unit cost ($33.40) was established? Mr. Holley answered the actual cost of the budget was established, then the total amount of acreage or overall amount of units was spread against the total cost. President Birdsall closed public testimony at 10:05 PM. It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Mu~oz to extend the meeting. The motion was unanimously carried. Director Parks asked staff to respond to citizens who raised questions. 4\CSDM[N\072490 -7- 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24, 1990 City Manager Dixon stated staff will respond to all calls and letters receiver either one on one, or with a written response. He stated some issues can be answered very quickly, others will require a great deal of research. Mr. Dixon asked that those citizens who have concerns put their concerns in the appeal forms available at the back of the building. He thanked the people who have commented because it will make the process smoother next year. Director Parks stated there are several policy issues that need to be addressed, i.e. homeowner association lands, golf course properties, agricultural properties. He asked that policy concepts could be brought back next week on the agenda for discussion. Director Mu~oz asked if these fees are likely to increase in the future, or would it be safe to state that as more development takes place and are further spread, these fees would not increase to the individual property owner. City Manager Dixon stated there are built in costs that the City does not control, such as power costs, continuing maintenance of slopes, water, etc. These costs will probably go up, however, they will be subject to the bidding process. With respect to the overall City fee, he stated if a real need is presented, the City may need to increase these fees. Director Parks asked if these expenses will be tracked by City employees. City Manager Dixon stated the tracking methods will be very precise. For example, the exact cost for moving the lawns, water, etc. will be tracked. Director Moore moved, Director Mu~oz seconded a motion to close the Public Hearing at 10:12 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION CSD 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR PARK, STREET ~,IGHTING AND S!. OPE MAINTENANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None 4\CSDMIN\072490 -8- 08/07/90 CSD MINUTES July 24, 1990 CITY MANAGERS REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT None given. DIRECTORS REPORTS Director Lindemans thanked Mr. Holley for a job well done on an extremely complicated project. City Attorney Fields stated the City does have a Quimby Ordinance in effect. He stated there should not be any problems in the future and land or fees will be collected. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to adjourn at 1 O: 20 PM to the meeting of July 31, 1990 at 7:00 PM at the Temecula Community Center. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, President June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk 4\CSDMIN\072490 -9- 08/07/90 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD JULY 31, 1990 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:53 PM, President Patricia Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CSD BUSINESS 1. Appeal Procedures - CSD Rates and Charges City Manager Dixon reported during the public hearing on July 24, 1990, staff was directed to review the procedures recommended by staff for implementation during the evaluation of appeals filed in connection with the levy of TCSD rates and charges. He stated this is an effort made by staff to make the procedure as fair and equitable as possible. He said this report outlines these procedures and they can be adjusted according to the Council's wishes. He recommended reviewing each category and getting Council direction. Private Parks Recommendation: Apply the agricultural land-use rate of $16.70 per acre. Director Parks stated he would like to see this an exempt category as the residents are already paying to maintain these parks. City Manager Dixon reported one part of the assessment is for parks and one is for recreation. He said even if a subdivision has it's own park, the residents are involved in the community recreation programs. He suggested instead of completely exempting these areas the lower agricultural rate be charged. He said it would be difficult to determine what areas would be exempt and what 4~CSDMIN\O73190 -1- 08/07/90 CSD Minutes July 31, 1990 areas would not, indicating quite a large area is involved. A straw vote was taken to approve staff recommendation applying the agricultural land-use rate of $16.70 per acre for private parks was taken as follows: AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Birdsall NOES: I DIRECTORS: Parks ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Open Space Areas Recommendation: Place this land in an exempt category City Manager Dixon reported this land cannot be developed or used for any other purpose and recommended placing this in an exempt category. Councilmember Mu~oz asked what is the rationale for this exemption. Mr. Dixon responded that this land is not usable space. A straw vote for staff recommendation to place this land in an exempt category was taken as follows: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall None None Agricultural Land Recommendation: Assessment should be based on $16.70 per acre for agricultural land, with a designated maximum number of acres subject to charges. Council may wish to establish a 25 acre maximum for such cases. City Manager Dixon recommended that large parcels of land be given a special consideration of $16.70 per acre with a maximum acreage charge of 25 acres. 4\CSDMIN\073190 -2- 08107/90 CSD Minutes July 31o 1990 Director Mu~oz stated the problem with this recommendation is several large land owners have extensive land which will be sold as commercial property. In this case, he suggested deferring the charges. City Manager Dixon stated the reason for this recommendation is to not create a hardship for farmers who may continue to farm for 20 years, creating a large lien against the property. Director Mu~oz said if the acres are developed as commercial property, the assessment would be more than covered. A straw vote was taken to change the staff recommendation and approve a deferral program as follows: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Mobile Home Park Sites Recommendation: Base the total assessment on the number of spaces in the park at $25.05 per space. This is the assessment applied to apartments and condominiums. A straw vote was taken to support staff recommendation as follows: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Golf Courses Recommendation: All acreage used for golf should be assessed at the agricultural rate of $16.70. All acreage used for hotel/motel, restaurant, club house, and parking should be assessed at the non-residential (improved) rate of $200.40 per acre. 4\CSDMIN\073190 -3- O8/07/90 CSD Minutes July 31. 1990 A straw vote was taken to support staff recommendation as follows: The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Hardship Criteria Recommendation: Establish an annual fixed income level of $12,000 or less to qualify for a deferment of the assessment. Director Lindemans suggested raising the fixed income level for joint filing to $18,000/annually. A straw vote was taken to approve staff recommendation with the change of annual fixed income level of $12,000/single and $1 8,000/joint as follows: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None President Birdsall suggested placing an ad in the newspaper explaining that these appeals may be applied for prior to receiving the tax bill. City Manager Dixon reported that between now and the time we process the computer run, those areas needing change will be adjusted. He said staff is trying to make as many adjustment as possible before the computer run out is made. President Birdsall asked if citizens will be receiving an answer to their letters from the City. City Manager Dixon stated every request will receive an answer. City Manager Dixon informed Council that a motion needs to be made approving the procedure for evaluating rates and charges appeals. 4\CSDMIN\O73190 -4- 08/07/90 CSD Minutes July 31, 1990 It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to approve the criteria as voted upon. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall None None NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: CITY MANAGERS REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT None given. DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 9:35 PM to a meeting to be held August 14, 1990 at the Temecula Community Center. The motion was unanimously carried. Patricia H. Birdsall, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk 4\CSDMIN\073190 -5- 08/07/90 Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 405 - Temecula. CA 92390 [7~4] 699-0235 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT SUBMITTAL DATE: June 26, 1990 CSA 143 Director Jeanine R. Overson SPORTS COMPLEX MAINTENANCE - CSA / RECONMENDEDMOTION: That the Board approve the attached Agreement for Landscape Service to Dennis Reeve; and authorize the Chairman to execute same on the Temecula Community Service District's behalf. JUSTFICATION: The County Service Area 143 recommends that the Board accept the contract with Mr. Reeve for landscape maintenance for Temecula Sports Park and Sam Hicks Park. Mr. Reeve has been maintaining CSA 143 parks since October 1, 1988 and is being recommended to continue by Tatsumi and Associates and the County Building Services Department. Tatsumi and Associates have been contracted by CSA 143 to recommend maintenance contractors. We are recommending that Mr. Reeve continue the landscape maintenance for Temecula Community Service District. May 28, 1990 DENNIS REEVE BALL PARK MAINTENANCE 27475 YNEZ ROAD SUITE 106 TEMECULA, CA 92390 (714) 676-8511 DIRECTED TO: Jeanine Overson CSA 143 RE: Maintenance Contract SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES: Turf areas will rereive mowing and edging at least once every 7 days or twice when needed. Planter beds will be weeded once every 14 days c.r more often as needed. Pruning of trees and shrubs will take place twice per mort t h. All clippings and cuttings will be promptly removed and disposed of on same day as .-utting. All walkways will be edged and swept. Trash will be removed from all mowing areas and flower and shrub beds daily. Herbicides and pesticides will be applied as needed, and used in cc, mpliance with country regulations. (see attached forms) Herbicides will be paid for by Ball Park Maintenance, however, pesticides will be paid for by the county. Irrigation and Rodent control are checked daily. Action is scheduled as needed. These type of problems are considered urgent, and are treated on an ASAP or an Emergency basis. Fertilizati.-.n takes place 4 times per year or every 3 m._-,nths. Labor is included, however, the fertilizer is billed directly to the c,-,L~nby by the supplier. Airating will be done once per year if needed. I will personally schedule and supervise. Cost of rental equipment and operator will be paid by the county upc. n approval of bid. Sprinkler heads will be repaired and/or replaced as needed. Extra charge will be for cost of materials only. · . PAGE 2 SCOPE OF WORK ON INFIELDS INCLUDES: Large softball infields are dragged, prepped, watered, and chalked, six days per week. Small infields are dragged, prepped, watered, and chalked six days per six days per week. All infields will receive herbicide treatment and edging on c. utside perimeters and foul lines. SCOPE OF WORK ON PARKING LOTS INCLUDE: Sweeper services, using power sweeper, will take place three times per week per lc. catic, n. ADDITIONAL LABOR: Areas maintained, square footage totals, and costs of services, are listed on page 3. The fc. llowing, includes services that may incur above and beyond the scope of work detailed in this contract. Installation, remc, val, or replacement c,f landscaping will be an additional ,zharge of $18.00 per h._-.ur. This will be by request or approval of the county. Sprinkler heads damaged by vandalism, theft, weather conditions, c.r special events held on any park, will be repaired c.r replaced at the rate of $6.00 per h,z:,ur per man plus cost of materials. Valves, br,z, ken lines, or any maj.z,r irrigatic, n repairs, will be charged at an additional $18.0u per hour per man. Additional F'arks added to this contract July 1, 1990 tc, July 1, 1991 will be at the rate of $. 185 per square fo,z,t per year. All Infields will be charged ac.--ording to the size and request for care. Any work requested by the Cc, unty c,n Sundays and Holidays, will be an additional charge ,:,f $18.00 per h.:,ur per man. COUNTY REGULATIONS: All work will comply with County Standards as listed in attatched copies c,f: Spe,zific Sc,:,pe c.f Services, CSA 143 Landscape Maintenance Evaluatic, n and Report, and Pesticide Appl i0-ation Record. 000~/~ q~lOl q~lOl AqHINOM AqHINDW A~ ~a gI9 ~8T'0 080TT ~8I'0 AqHINOW ~W3A W3a $ L 0000~ lj DS 133HS ISOO dR N~393 HS~BI SOq313NI qq~WS S09313NI qq~8OWWH :SCI']313NI )~d S~3IH W~S )~d SIWOdS 03NI~INI~W ~3W~ S>~8~d ~3~ ~9NO3W31 Appendi~ "A", Project SPECIfiC SCOPE OF SERVICES This scope of services peNnins to: The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perfor.m the following maintenance services: General Maintenance (See Appendix 'D', Landscape blalntenance Bid Form, rot approximate area quantltles) Landscape Maintenance Contractor or Contractor's representative, along with CSA 143 repre- sentative or Landscape Consultant shah make at least twelve (12) general inspections of the premises per year. These persons should be experienced in landscape maintenance and , preferably, should have an education in Ornamental Ho.iculture and/or field experience in landscape maintenance. Complete policing (litter pick-up) of aH maintenance areas weekly, h~cludlng landscaping, path- ways, flowerbeds and driveways. Landscape Maintenance Contractor will conduct maintenance services at the site as deemed under Items B, C, D and E of this Appendix and at the minimum frequency as defined under Items B, C, D and E o[ this Appendix. I'erformance shall be evaluated by CSA 143 representatives as deemed under Item F of this AppendLx. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall make available emergency service on a 24 hour a day, seven days per week basis. 5. Cleaning and maintenance of all dsain.ge lines and catch basLns on an as-needed basis. Complete wash down, sweel~ing, vacuuming or blowing off of all wa!'ks as necessary. This does not include garages or All materials used during the course of the maintenance process shall either conform to CSA 143 approved landscape cons[ruction specifications or shall otherwise be acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143. The Riverside CountySen'ice Area 143 shall be given a monthly record of all herblcides, insecticides and disease control chemicals used. (See AppendLx "C": Pesticide Application Record) Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair or replace at his own expense any and all damage to property caused by any act or omission of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor, his employees or his agent. 9. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall dispose of all waste materials in a CSA 143 approved waste disposal facility. .. TurfP,.lalntenance (See Appendix 'D', Landscape blah~tenance Bid Form, for approximate area quan- tities) Mowing shall be done at least every 5-7 needed at other seasons.' days during the Spring and Fall seasons, and as ,,t,,,ul,u~,~ ,, , l luJutL .... Parcel/Tract All cuUings shall promptly be collected and disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contrac- tor. All sidewalks shall bc cleaned of grass cuttings, etc. on the same day as the mowing. The height of grass is subject Io the approval by the Riverside County Service Area 143 and t)~e material planted; however, a height of ~ inches in winter and g inches in summer is recomtnended. Apply complete chemical fungus and insect controls as necessary. If needed, control broad leaf weeds with selective herbicicles. In areas where Crabgrass has infested the Turf, apply pre-emer- gent herbicicles such as Dacthal, Balan or Betasan for control, prior to Crabgrass germination. All materiMs used in this function shall be paid by the Riverside CounlyService Area 143 at tile Contractor's cost price. Turf shall be watered at such frequency as weather conditions require, to replenish soll moisture below the root zone. Watering shall always be done at night. Normally, a total of '1 ~ inches of water are needed weekly during hot weather. Re-seed and/or re-sod failing Tuff areas as necessary. including labor and materials, if due to the Contractor's negligence. Turf shall be fertilized in 4 applications with a total of 7 ¼ pounds of Gro-Fower Hi-Nitrogen 14-4-9 per 1,000 square feet per year. Fertilizers shall be paid as an e.x'tra by the Riverside Coun- ty Service Area ].43 at tile Contractor's cost price as predetermined in Ihe Unit Price section of rile landscape maintenance bid forms. Notify CSA 143 24 hours prior to fertilization. ir required, remove thatch by verticuttlng, preferably in the Fall, but other~4se in the Spring. At this time, fertilize with Gro-Power Hi-Nitrogen ld ,1.-9 and over-seed if needed. Over-seeding must precede pre-emergent herbicldes by at least four (4) to six (6) weeks. Normally, fixls means that turf which have been invaded by Crabgrass should be renovated and over-seeded in the Fall and treated for Crabgrass control in the following late Winter. Aerify compacted areas to ira- prove water penetration whenever needed. Tree and Shrub Maintenance (See Appendix 'D', Landscape Maintenance Bid Form, for approximate area quantities) 1. Sltrubbcry and tree beds shall be edged at least 4 times per month. Shrub plant material shah be manicured regularly to contain their size in respect to species, size of planter or relative to surroundings, and to tile best health of the plant. Sixrubs shall not be clipped into bailed or boxed forms unless such is required by the design. All pruning cuts shah be made to lateral branches or buds, or flush with the trunk. 'Stubbing will not be permitted." Prune trees to select and develop permanent scaffold branches that are smaller in diameter than the trunk or br:inch to which they are attached, which have vertical spacing of 18' to 48' and radial orientation so as not to overlay one another; to eliminate diseased or damaged growlh; to elinfinate narrow v-shaped branch forks that lack strength; to reduce toppling and wind damage by titinning out crowns; to maintain growlh within space limitations; to maintain a natural ap- pearance; and to balance cro~vn with roots. Under no circumstances will stripping of lower branches ('raising up') of young trees be per- mitted. Lower branches shall be relaincd in a 'tipped back' or pinched condition with as much Appendix "A",. Project Piercol/Tract -~. foliage as possible to promote callper [funk growlh(toppcd trunk). Lower branches can be cut flush with the trunk only after the tree is able to stand erect without staking or other support. Evergreen trees shall be thinned out and shaped when necessary to prevent wind and storm damage. The primary pruning of deciduous trees shall be done during the dormant season. Damaged trees or those that constitute health or safety hazards shall be pruned at any time of the year as required. All trimming litter shall be disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to tile Riverside County Service Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Remove stakes and guys as soon as they are no longer needed. Stakes and guys are to be inspected to prevent girdling of trunks or branches, and to prevent rubbing that causes bark wounds. Notify CSA 143 24 hours prior to removal of stakes and guys. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all trees and shrubs including labor and material to be paid by tile Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Keep basins and area between plants free of weeds. Use recommended legally approved her- blcides. Avoid frequent soil cultivation flint destroys shallow roots. Use mulches to help prevent weed seed germination. 10. Once, early in Spring, and once, late in Spring, fertilize recently established plants witIt slow release tablets. Avoid applying fertilizer to the rootball and base of main stem; rather, space evenly under plant to drip llne. Plant tablets to be Gro-Power. Apply according to manufactuser's recommendations. AJI fertilizers shall be paid as an extra by the Riverside Coun- tyservice Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Notify CSA 143 24 hours prior to fertilization. 11. Maintain a large enough water basin around plants so that enough water can be applied to estab- lish moisture thsough the major root zone. When hand watering, use a water wand to break the water force. Use mulches to reduce evaporation and frequency o[ watering. Watering shall be performed at such a frequency as weather conditions requires, to replenish soll moisture tluough the major root zone. Remove dead and dying plants and replace '.,Ath plants of an equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid by the Landscape blaintenance Contractor. Flower Bed antFor IIerbaceous Gro~undcover (h,cludh, g slope planting) l~laintenance (See Appendix 'D', Lnndscnpe Maintenance Bid Form, for approximate area quantities) Trim and edge all flower bed and groundcover areas a minimum of 4 times per month to achieve an overall even appearance. Control weeds, preferably ~qth pre-emergent herblcldes, but also with selective systemic her- blcldes as recommended by a licensed pest control/herbicides advisor. Hoe weeds as little as possible since this may result in plant damage. It will be considered unsatisfactory to allow weeds Io grow unabated for more than one (1) week. L'tndscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all flower and groundcover beds including labor and materials to be paid/or by tile Riverside Coun- ty Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. ,,~.~.~:~u~,., /, , i~uJ~cL Parcel/lracL Apply 20 . pounds of Gro-Power Plus per 1,000 square feet per year in 4 applications during the first year of new planting or if plant material is nitrogen starved. Apply 20 pounds of Gro-Powcr Plus per I,(X)O square feet per year in 2 applications in slope areas. __ application should be in early Spring when gtowll, begins. Increase to 25 pounds of Gro-I'ower Plus in following years or as needed to maintain vigorous growth and good color. Complete fertilizers are desired in Spring and Fall. Landscape Maintcnance Contractor shall inonthly cultivate all base groundcover and flower bed arcaS. Remove trash weekly to a legal disposal area. Water enough that moisture penetrates throughout the root zone, and only as frequently as neees- say to maintain healthy growlh. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perforlrn routine repairs of erosion and other damage to slopes due to normal maintenance conditions. Replace dead and missing plants with plants of equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid for by Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Irrigation System (See Appendlx "D', Landscape blalntenance BId Form, for approximate area quan- tifies) Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall, on a weekly basis, inspect and repair as required all irrigation heads for full coverage and adjustment. Adjust heads as necessary to minimize over- spray on buildings, sidewalks or other un-landscaped areas. Lateral lines shall be flushed out after removing the last irrigation head or two at each end of the lateral. Should poor coverage of localized areas become evident, the Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall rectify the same ',,,qthin one watering period by adding new sprinklers or new lines. Repairs to system shah be made with originally specified materials or suitable substitute. Such materials may be charged extra at the Contractor's cost price. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair all damages to irrigation system at Isis own ex- pense. However, major repairs such as controllers, valves and mainllnes, or additional installa- tion items may be charged extra at the current agreed rate. In either case, all repairs shall be made within one watering period. Set and program automatic ;:oatrollers for seasonal water requirements. If controller enclosures do not incorporate a locking device, Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall install a locking device and give Owner's representative a key to controllers and instructions on how to turn off system in case of emergency. Performance Evaluallon The performance of the .maintenance work will be reviewed and monitored by CSA 143 representatives on a random basis. DuFmg these periodic reviews, CSA 143 representatives will utilize the Landscape Maintenance Evaluation Checklists to document the findings. CSA 143 representatives may review dividual parcels or any number of parcels at any given time ~vith or without the presence of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Implementing a rating scale for dcs;gnated landscape maintenance tasks, over- all performance will be evaluated on a point system. Any overall rating falling below 80% of all possible points will be deemed unsatisfactory. A reduction in the amount of 10% of monthly payment will be assessed for each month the evaluation rating is defined as unsatisfactory. Three consecutive unsatisfactory ratings may, at the discretion of CSA Appendix "A", Project__ rParcel/Tract 143, result in the termination o[ the cnti~e contract. See Appendix 'F" for samples of the Landscape Main- tenance Evaluation Checklists. Additional Information specific for thls parcel/tract: PRO J E C T IR,\CT;~ DATE/I [PIE INSPECIED B. B. C. BY IURF I. Howing 2. Edging 3. Weeds 4. Pest/Disease 5. Color GROUND COVER 1. Edging 2. Weeds 3. Pest/Disease 4. Color SHRUB S 1. Pruning 2. Weeds 3. Pest/Disease 4. Color IREES [. Prtm. ing 2. Staking 3. Pest/Disease lANDSCaPE MAINTENANCE EV'AI.UATION SCORE BEPORT POSSIBLE SCORE 6 5 4 4 5 6 4 4 CSA lz, 3 Landscape Maintenance Evl~untion Report Page 2 D. IRRIGATION 1. Quality of Repair 2. Programmiug Controllers J, 4. Sprinkler tuning CLEANLINESS 1, Walks 2. Dulnpsters 3. Equipmerit 4. Fertilize~~ PLAY AREAS 1. Tot lot 2, Play equipment 3. Trash receptacles 4. Barbeque fixtures SPORTS PARK 1. Benches 2. Pool areas & basketball/te~mis courts 3. Volleyball courts RE~RKS 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 CSA 143 Landscape Haintenance Evaluation PROJECT : IRACT : DATE/TIME: INSPECTED 8¥: POINTS Turf A) Nowinq: tlas ruts and missed areas. Chewed ends and non-uniformed height. Not uni formed height. Chewed grass tips instead of clean cuts. Grass clumps. Height higher or 16~er than recommended. No mi ssea areas. No ruts. ,. Sharp blades no chewed en. ds. Some grass clumps. Turf moved to proper uniform height. (All blades · at same height) - no variation between mowers. No missed areas - (adequate overlapping). No ruts. No grass clumps, i.~., mowing of wet turf or'not emptying basket frequently enough. Grass cut with sharp blades not chewed up by dul 1 blades. Thatching of warm season turf. Page 1 o f 9 B) Edaina: Edging noL done on tile vertical. "Hissed" areas, (forgot to edge). This would be indicaLed by grass height or lengLh in the excess of 4". Not edged frequently enough. Edging height not uniform with mowed height. Weedeating around trees instead of bare area. All trees in turf shall have 6" bare dirt clearance around circumference of trunk at grade. All edges adjacent to walks, curbs, paved areas, buildings, and other.miscellaneous objects in tur areas shall be edged as needed to maintain a well defined edge. Pao. e 2 of 9 C) Weeds: 40% or more of area contains weeds or any weeds over 3' in height or length, (three feet). 70% - 79% weed free and no weeds larger than 3". 80% - 89% wee~ free, (no weed over allowable, however). , 90% - 100% weed free. D) Pest/Disease: 40% or more infested. 70~ -79% pest free. Lots of old damage. Infestation went pretty far before controlled. 80.% 89~; pest free - evidence of some past damage. gO% - 100% pest/disease free. E) Color: · Less than 70% uniform green. I. Iore Lhan one sLress area in same lawn. 70~ -79% uniform green. Very chlorotic. 90,% - ]00% uniform green. Ground Cover A/~d~in~: Ground cover past curb or up side of building, or into shrubs. Corners not square. No edging around trees. Not edged frequently enough. Only outside edges done, other items inside ground cover not edged enough. Ground cover up to edge of buildin and trees, but not yet growing up side of building tree or trunks. All edges adjacent to walks, curbs, paved areas, buildings, shrubs, trees and other miscellaneous objects in ground cover areas shall be edged as n~eded to maintain a well defined edge. · Hounding around cover should have edges cut on a 45 degree angle away from walks to a green service verses brown underground. Clean perimeter around base of all trees. Ne'xt to buildtng~ should have 4" 6" bare area. B) Weeds: 40% or more contains.weeds or any weeds present ,. over one foot. 70%-- 79% weed free, or any weeds present of 80% - 89% weed free. 90% - , 100% weed free. C) Pest/Disease: 40% or more infested. 70% -7~% pest free. Lots of old damage. Infestation ~vent pretty far before controlled. 80% - 89% pest free evidence of some past damage. 90% - 100% pgst/disease free. D) Color: Stressed or dead spots in more than 40% of areas. Page 3 of 9 Chlorotic, 30%. ".. A few chlorotic spoils, (less than 20%). 90% - 100% uniform and lush. Shrubs::-'::~ i ! , .., · A). Pruninq: ~ : .. : , .,.:: , · .i Not pruned in proper,~'manner, natural verses · '...she~red. ' .J "',. 70%.-' 79% ]n excellent condition. Sucker growth '~ present. Somewhat overgrown, i.e., t}me to · ~: prune agBin.. ' '.'.~1'~' -.'. 80%: 89% p~ned ~n' correct manner, natural or ., sheBred. Sore wh~t overgrown, ~.e., time to prune again. i..' ..' 90%- 100% pruned in'correct manner~ (natural or sh'eared), and at correct time of year. No broken or d]se~sed branches. No hubs. Good containment.,,~. ..: B) Weeds: 60% weed. free or ~ny weeds over 6". 70% - 80% weed free and no weeds over 6". Less than 20% of area contains weeds and no weeds of 4". - 90% 100% w6ed f~ee and bare areas cultivated. C) Pest/Disease: 40% or more infested. 70,% -79~ pest free. Lots of old damage. ]nfestation went pretty far before controlled. 80% - 89% pest free - evidence of some past damage. 90% - 100% pest/disease free. D) Col or: · 60% or less perfect color. 30% dead blooms, non vibrant color conlbinaLion. Page 4 o f 9 Trees Less than 20% dead blooms, Some plants blooming out of sync with the others in the same planter,(i.e., Marigolds blooming, Salvia finished}. lotally filled in.if new plantin sufficient number to fill in when mature - less 10% than dead blooms. A) Pruninq Needs to be structured. Broken or diseased branches present. Improper'cuts. Proper structure some firebri ht, (especially Pears}. Some sucker growth~ ~ranches low over wal ks. Proper structure no broken or diseased branches, no hubs. Some sucker growth. No sucker growth and nt> hubs, broken or diseased branches. Base of canoly at correct height, eight feet over walks. toper structure for the intended use screen verses airy. B) Stakinq: Stakes leanin9'~or fallen Guys broken, unsleeved or Improperly ~laced. lrees needing to be staked aren't. ' No tree ties. One staked where two needed. Staked crooked not totally vertical. Stake not cut off at correct height. Incorrect tree ties. (2) stakes are c uL are not vertical. Tree ties (minimum 2)are installed. Stake upright. Trees and ' nt properly correc height. Stakes removed where not needed. No Page 5 of 9 Note: Less than 70% of total required stakes installed. 70% 79% 80% - 89% -' 90% - 100% C) Pest/Disease: 40% or more infested. 70% - 79% pest free. Lots'of old damage. Infestation went pretty far before controlled. 80% -' 89% pest free damage. evidence or some past gO% -.100% pest/disease free. Irrigation A} Quality of Repair: No repair where one needed or repair/alteration that does not solve problem. Correct head but improper placement with regard to finish grade or distance of walks/buildings. Pipe/head repair correct, but sloppy cleanup/repair of adjacent landscape. Sprinklers set at 'correct height, correct heads used, correct inserts used, and landscape damage repaired around repaired heads/valves/pipe, etc, B) Proqramminq: Not using controller. Obvious stress area in landscape. Stress areas are both too dry and too wet. 2 ..... Page G of 9 Incorrect time on stations For type of plants. Correct time allotted to each station, but not most effective use.of controller capabilities. Effective use of controller* ~sapabilities. Correct amount of time allotted each area. Controllers: Dirty and no irrigation maps. No irrigation maps, clean. Dirty but with maps. map for each station. All knobs on. ock provided. D) Sprinkler Tuninq: 60% or less of system fine tuned. Lack of coverage. Overspray on sidewalk, streets, or building. 70% - 79% of system fine tuned. Some misting some overspray on sidewalks, streets ,or buildings. Htxed type of heads on same ltne. 80% 89% of system rifle tuned. Some misting, no overspray on sIdewalks, streets, or buildings. Complete coverage. 90% - 100% of heads fine tuned. No misting, no overspray on sidewalks, streets, or buildings. Complete coverage. Cleanliness A) Walks: 60% of walks debris free, or enough leaves on walk to kick or pile. 70% - 7g% of all walks clean of all debris. 80% 89% trash/debris Free. 90% - 100% free of any debris, natural (leaves) or man made (papers). Cannot blow onto public areas. B) DunlDsters: Trashed daily, swept once a week. C) Equipment: Cleaned stored properly.' D) Fertil izer Fertilization at regular, specified intervals. 24 Ilour notification. Page 7 of ? ." , P1 ay Areas A) Tot Lot: No raking of sand in tot Lot. Sand below · t required dep h. .. Raking of sand in tot Lot but still below required depth. Sand in tot Lot raked. Sand at required depth. B) Play Equipment: Not properly maintained. Safety problems. Properly maintained equipment. Safe for kids to play on. C) Trash Receptacles: Overflow or trash around ~eceptacles. Trash removed weekly. Barbeque Fixtures Never cleaned. Excess trash and ashes around barbeque fixtures. Cleaned but still some ~rash exists. lhoroughly cleaned. No trash or ashes. Sports Park A) Bencites: Never cleaned. Debris and graffiti exist. Bencites wiped clean. Debris and grafriti still exist. All debris and graffiti cleaned. Benches wiped clean. Page 8 of 9 C) Pool A'r~as Areas Areas D) Volleyball Sand Sand swept and/or Courts: not raked. raked. & ~a~ketball/Tennis Courts: not swept and/or washed. washed. Prepared for: Jeanine Overson County Service Area ]43 2-°377 Rancho California Road Rancho California, California '92390 Prepared'By: Tatsumi & Partners ]7461Derian Avenue. Suite Irvine, California 92714 June 21, ]989 224 C,: r'~".?.:.l .'; Ta:'.'urni & Farmnets, 1~:S9. No pan of Ibis doeJmenl m'~y be {e~'rcx:luced or d,s~zibu~ed in any Iorn~ cr by I~ny me3n!, or s;cied ; mn 3 c~:a ~-i~ c' ~e:ncval s~s:em I~ ~ny pu~ose othe~ U~an s~dfie Gve~sid~ Counb' ~en-ice/~ea 143 u~. J Riverside County Service Area 443 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Roact Suite 405 - Temecula, CA 92390 [714] 699-0235 Fax: [714] 699-4390 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT SUBMITTAL DATE: July 12, 1990 That the Board approve a continual Agreement for Landscape Service to California Landscape; and authorize the Chairman to execute same on the Temecula Community Service District's behalf. ,JUSx J_FIC~TION: The County Service Area 143 recommends that the Board accept the contract with California Landscape for landscape maintenance for Ridgeview. California Landscape has been maintaining CSA 143 areas since May 23,1990 and is being recommended to continue by Tatsumi and Associates. Tatsumi and Associates have been contracted by CSA 143 to recommend maintenance contractors. Also they were chosen as an alternate through the County Purchasing Bidding Process RFP. We are recommending that California Landscape continue the landscape maintenance for Temecula Community Service District.. . Quotation # p2/t9 N [] Request for 80 Washington Street, 92504-4698 ..~: RO. Box 1259, Riverside, CA 92502-1259 · . . Proposal # 9 41 4 2 (714) 275-4937 · FAX (714) 36g-9244 · .... , Closing Date Sept' '15, '19 8~:30 RM. · jc 08-.].8-89 ,. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS Buyer~rQn Phone 275-493R IlL IV. V. V|. Vii. VIII. IX. X. XI. Pre-Qualificalion -- Unless slated elsewhere In Ibis documenl, you musl lift out and Telurn with your response the allached Pre-quallflcallon/Vendor Information form, Io be qualified. If no Iorm Is enclosed or Ihere are no other pre-quelillcallon requirements staled elsewhere In this document, you may assume you ere pre-quallfled. Prices/Notations All prices/notations must be typewritten or wrillen In Ink. No erasures permitted. Mistakes shall be Crossed oul, Corrections made adjacent and Initialed by person signing document. Each Item shall be bid separately. Format -- Use the documents provided· II you decide Io submit more than one bid, photocopy our documents. nc~grl'erms/Tax -- All pricing shall be F.O.B. our dock, n~;'J;bX3'~ {e.g., cash lares lees than 20 days should be considered net) excluding applicable tax. The County pays Calilornla sales tax and Is exempt Irom Faderat excise tax. In Ihe event ol In extension error, the unit price shall prevail. Other Terms and Conditions -- The terms and conditions ee indicated on Ihe reverse side ol this document and/or attached are a part of this document and shall apply. Period ol Firm Pricing -- Unless elated olhanvlee elsewhere in this document, prices shall be Ilrm lot 45 days alter Ihe closing date. SpecilicalionlChanges -- Wherever brand names are used, the words "or equal" shall be considered Io appear and be · part of Ihe speclllcatlon. It you are quoting anD{her make or mode, Cross out our nonmenctature and insert yours. II no make or model IS stipulated, Insert yours. Attach applicable specifications and/or brochures. ValetIons tn manufacturers, design, sic., may be acceptable, bidders are encouraged Io offer IheP as allernatlves; however, the County reserves the right to reject those alternatives as non-responsive. . Method ol Award -- The Courtly reserves Ihe fight Io reject any or all alters, Io wane an); discrepancy or technically and io spill or make Ihe award In any manner deisTmined by the County Io be most advantageous to Ihe Counly. The Counly recognlzel that prices are only one of several crllerla to be used In Judging an offer end the County Is not legally bound Io accept Ihe loweel offer. Closln Date/Return To -- The bid response shall be delivered to the address above by 1:30 p.~, on the closing dale listed above. The closing dale and lime and Ihe R.~.Q.IR.F.R number relerenced above Ihall appear on the outside of Ihe seated envelope.' Mull Pad Bid Sheets -- Relurn all three copies, with your company name prlnled on Ihe lop .o,I each page. Deliver Io Address -- Products/services bid shaft be delivered Io THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE PART OF THE RFQ/P ~ Prequelificatlon Form ' El General Conditions Equipment I::] Special Conditions RFQ [~.General Conditions, Meierisis &Services (:3 General Conditions E.C,~eneral Conditions R.Fp, REFER ALL INQUIRIES TO BID SECTION ITEM ~ QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION " NO. Landscape maintenance services as per· the attached appendix A~ incorpo~%ed into,.,.a city, the County reserves the righ~'~'~ancel the contract.) '~'~'~q~ '. I~ Appendix A El BId Sheet Equlpmenl U Samples TO BE COMPLETED .... UNIT PRICE EXTENSION "Execution hersol Is certification Ihal the undersigned ha read and understands Ihe terms an4 condilionS hersol, and that the underslgned's principal Is fully bound and cammilled;' TOTAL TYPE OR California Lanecape Maintenance Inc · PRINT · COMPANY NAME 27401 Ynez Road STREET ADDRESS Temecula, California 92390 MAILING ADDRESS ZIP SALES TAX TRANSPORTATION CHARGE IF~PPLICABLE GRAND TOTAL CITY STATE ZIP Ran Jeanes NAME TITLE CASH DISCOUNT {FROM RECEIPT OF GOODS OR INVOICE, WHICHEVER IS LATER.J CASH 1ERMS LESS THAN 20 (:~,YS W1LL eE coNeDEfiES Cash dlscounl shall be applied to grand total amount. DATE H6-5 (Re. 5-.eel SIGNATURE PHONE (714) 699-0138 FAX(714) F~QQ-SR24 DELIVERY: calendar days after receipt of order. COMMERCIAL. & INDUSTRIAL ~ ....· Liccf~cd Contr~,ctorL. No. 271220 C-27, A.B ;' PROPOSAL SUBMFFFrED TO: NAME: County S~;rvice Area #143 STREFT: 29377 R~[ncho California Road Ste. CITY/ST/ZIP " Temecula, California 92390 ATTENTION: Bob Kast ,J" :'1 J 990 CBA (818) 346-7552 ..')T . Fax (714) 699-5824 . .Fax (818) 346-6752 ';',. : PHONE:: , .. '.~. DATE: ' ' 714'.699'0235 January JOB NAME:. ',:. "Ridgeview C.S.A. Tract STREET: 105 La Serena Way CITY/ST/ZIP Temecula, California 92390 1990 Dear Sir: We propose to furnish the following Landscape Maintenance and other related services: Per County Service Area "Specific Scope of SirVices". "Appendix A" and attached map. All of the above work to be performed in a substantial and workmanlike manner according to standard practices for the sum of One Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty,Dollars($ 1850.00 ) per month. All services will be billed on a monthly basis and are due on the tenth of the month following. Re lly ubmitted, .~~~ IAN~~ANCE, INC. Ron Je 2 , , . and according to the terms thereof, ACCEPTED By': .... ' :' · ": ." ;' :' '. ~, 'Date ,19 __ AppoudLx ;Landscape"'.' Maintenance Bid Fore Name or Project Name or Bidder Raturn to s Item ~ 2 Ridgeview Tract California Landscape Maint. JDate Due ' Delcrlptlon Slopes Landscape Irri~ation Maint. Inc. Quantity appro~.212,640 $.085 .... per on Total Bid Cost/Month (title parcel/tract) . $1850.00 ._aDOR'SINSTRUCTIONS . .~,,~./UI~I I I ~/1" I"llvr...i-I~,~n./I- . , ~.,, iv, ,n~.,--- v, ,,-.---, 3. Noplrtteablings.,ramlwhenspecWedinoeder:-,,, *. *'~' s-.:* "' ' ' 7. Out-of-StalevendoeaMUSTshowCABoeglolEq. PenmtNo, Oltleewisesalestaxwibe~ &tApQRTANT:Se~ershaJIixovtdematemalsafeb/dateshee~loreechproductcorUmingm ' as 4. THIS ORDER E)~SLY I. IkiIB ACCEP1ANCE TO THE S OF ORDER. ANY ADD~IONAL OR . . , and ~ of D%-FERENTlI~RMSPROPOSEDBYTHE- III:IqARERE.JECTEDUNLESSEXPRESSI_YASSENI~DTOIN IstedbyCAD4r. tr~.Fiel. inCAAdm. Code, TItleB, Sec. 5194andLab~Codem. WRf'I'INGBY'fi-IEBUYER " ' SHIP TO: RIV. County Se=v',.cu Area I 14P4~archase Order 29377 Rancho C,,].i~. Rd, /.833390 [ tZ05 VENDOR California Landsuape Maint. Inc.. 27401 Ynez Road' Temecula,. Ca. 92390 699-0Z38 FAX (73.4) 699-5824 PHONE D/dE FUND CODE RED. NO. 305· 3,2' 85 2 38403, '..:.:" " 82020 QUANTn7 UNn' BILL 'TO: Temecula, Cu. 92390 Admini2trutivu Office County Admin. Center 4080 Lemon Riverside, Ca. 92503, F.O.B. TERMS: FROM RECEFT OF GOODS .., .',, ., OR INVOICE, WHICHEVER IS LATER DESCRIPTION - BLANKET LANDSCA~g MAZNTgNANC~ S~RVIC~ TO 6/30/90. THIS BLANK-~T SHALL COVP-R TiiB COUNTY~S R/~AINING FISCAL YEAR FROM 4/1/90 TO 6/30/90 A~D SHALL AUTO.~ATICALLY RENEW ITSSLF EACH YEA~ UNLESS CANCELLED BY TRE COUNTY. TO INSURE PROMPT PAYMENT OF YOUR INVOICES A/~TER JULY 1 OF EACH Y~AR, YOU MUST CHANG= TEE LAST T~O DIGITS OF THE PURCHASE ORDP-R NU~6SR TO AGJL~E WITH TH~ LAST TWO DIGITS IN T~ N~XT CALENDAR YEAR. FOR EXAMPLe= ON JULY 1, 1989, BLANKET ORDER NUMBER 7363189 WILL BF. COME 7363190. Tn~ NEW NUMBeR MUST B= REFERENCED ON ALL .INVOICES TO INSURE PROMPT PAYMENT OF YOUR INVOIC, JiS. TOTA/, ANNUAL COSTS NOT TO EXCFJS:D RIDGgViEW TRACT 20735-7-8-9 UNIT PRICE THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL IN- VOICES, SHIPRNG PAPERS AND PACK- AGES. R.F.Q/RF.P. · AMOUNT .. 8,000.00 RECEIVED* ALL TgRMS, CONDITIONS A~D SPECIFICATIONS OF RFQ#94142 ARE ~EREBY TNCLUDED -' AS IF ~gT FORT~ (~T~ $I, 850.00 per mon~) : T~ COUNTY , ' ! , PNnNI= (7141 ")7r-,-4.cl.cl7 AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ,F..A_,),),)~(714) 369-9~44 _ Addendum "A" General Scope of Work SUMMARY DESCRIPTION The work involved which shall be performed includes, but is not limited to, the maintenance of all common areas, including banks, slopes turf, flowerbeds and pathways. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, supervisian, equipment, tools, materials, transportation, permits, insurance and taxes in his performance of this Scope of Services. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform maintenance in accordance with the highest horticultural standards keeping the project in a first-class condition. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform the following maintenance services: A. General Maintenance .- Landscape Maintenance Contractor or Contractor's representative, along with CSA 143 representative or Landscape Consultant shall make at least twelve (12) general inspections of the premises per year. These persons should be experienced in' landscape maintenance and , preferably, should have an education in Ornamental Horticulture and/or field experience in landscape maintenance. Complete policing (litter pick-up) of all maintenance areas weekly, including landscaping, pathways, floxverbeds and driveways. Landscape Maintenance Contractor will conduct maintenance services at the site as defined in Sections B, C, D and E and at the minimum frequency as defined in Sections B, C, D and E. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall make available emergency service on a 24 hour a day, seven days per week basis. Cleaning and maintenance of all drainage lines and catch basins on an as-needed basis. Complete wash down, sweeping, vacuuming or blowing off of all walks as necessary. This does not include garages or 7. All materials used during the course of the maintenance process shall either conform to CSA 143 approved landscape construction specifications or shall otherwise be acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143. The Riverside County Service Area 143 shall be given a monthly 2record of all herbicides, insecticides and disease control chemicals used. (See attached Pesticide Application Record Form) - see Addendure 8. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair or replace at his own expense any and all damage to property caused by any act or omission of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor, his employees or his agent. Turf Maintenance Mowing shall be done at least every seven (7) days during the Spring and Fall seasons, and as needed at other seasons. All cuttings shall promptly be collected and disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to the Riverside County Servi~e Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. All sidewalks shall be cleaned of grass cuttings, etc. on the same day as the mowing; The height of grass is subject to the approva! by the Riverside County Service Area 143 and type material planted; however, a height of 1-1/2 inches in winter and two inches in summer is recommended. Apply complete chemical fungus and insect controls as necessary.' If needed, control broad leaf weeds Mth selective herbicides. In areas where Crabgrass has infested the Turf, apply pre-emergent herbicides such as Dacthal, Balan or Betasan for control, prior to Crabgrass germination. All materials used in this function shall be paid by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Turf shall be watered at such frequency as weather conditions require, to replenish soil moisture below the root zone. Watering shall al~vays be done at night. Normally, a total of 1-1/2 inches of water are needed weekly during hot weather. Re-seed and/or re-sod failing Turf areas as .necessary, including labor and materials, if due to the Contractor's negligence.. Turf shall be fertilized with a total of four (4) pounds of actual nitrogen per 1,000 square feet per year. Fertilizers shall be paid as an extra by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price as predetermined in the Unit Price section of the landscape maintenance bid forms. If required, remove thatch by verticutting, preferably in the Fall, but otherwise in the Spring. At this time, fertilize with nitrate (N) and over-seed if needed. Over-seeding must precede pre-emergent herbicides by at least four (4) to six (6) weeks. Normally, this means that turf which have been invaded by Crabgrass should be renovated and over-seeded in the Fall and t..reated for Crabgrass control in the following late Winter. Aerify compacted areas to ithprove water penetration whenever needed. Tree and Shrub Maintenance Shrubbery and tree beds shall be edged at least two (2) times per month. .. Shrub plant material shall be manicured redularly to contain their size in respect to species, size of planter or relative to surroundings, and to the best health of the plant. Shrubs shall not be clipped into bailed or boxed forms unless such is required by the design. All pruning cuts shall be made to lateral branches or buds, or flush with the trunk. "Stubbing will not be permitted." Prune trees to select and develop permanent scaffold branches that are smaller in diameter than the trunk or branch to which they are attached, which have vertical spacing of 18" to 48" and radial orientation so as not to overlay one another; to eliminate diseased or damaged growth; to eliminate narrow v-shaped branch forks that lack strength; to reduce toppling and wind damage by thinning out crowns; to maintain growth within space limitations; to maintain a natural appearance; and to balance crown with roots. Under no circumstances MI1 stripping of lower branches ("raising up") of young trees be permitted. Lower branches shall be retained in a "tipped back" or pinched condition with as much foliage as possible to promote caliper trunk growth (topped trunk). Lower branches can be cut flush with the trunk only after the tree is able to stand erect without staking or other support. Evergreen trees shall be thinned out and shaped when necessary to prevent wind and storm damage. The primary pruning of deciduous trees shall be done during the dormant season. Damaged trees or those that constitute health or safety hazards shall be pruned at any time of the year as required. 10. All trimming litter shall be disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Remove stakes and guys as soon as they are no longer needed. Stakes and guys are to be inspected to prevent girdling of trunks or branches, and to prevent rubbing that causes bark wounds. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all trees and shrubs including labor and material to be paid by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contradtor's Cost price. Keep basins and area between plants free of weeds. Use recommended legally approved herbicides. Avoid frequent soil cultivation that destroys shallow roots. Use mulches to help prevent weed seed germination. Once, early in Spring, and once, late in Spring, fertilize recently established plants with slow release tablets. Avoid applying fertilizer to the ro0tball and base of main stem; rather, space evenly under plant to drip line. Plant tablets to be 21 gram "blue chip". Apply according to manufacturer's recommendations. All fertilizers shall be paid as an extra by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. 11. Maintain a large enough water basin around plants so that enough water can be applied to establish moisture through the major root zone. When hand watering, use a water wand to break the water force. Use mulches to reduce evaporation and frequency of watering. Watering shall be performed at such a frequency as weather conditions requires, to replenish soil moisture through the major root zone. 12. Remove dead and dying plants and replace with plants of an equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid by the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Flower Bed and/or Herbaceous Groundcover (including slope planting) Maintenance Trim and edge all flower bed and groundcover areas a minimum of two times per month to achieve an overall even appearance. Control weeds, preferably with pre-emergent herbicides, but also with selective systemic herbicides as recommended by a licensed pest control/herbicides advisor. Hoe weeds as little as possible since this may result in plant damage. It will be considered unsatisfactory to allow weeds to grow unabated for more than one (1) week. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all flower and groundcover beds including labor and materials to be paid for by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Apply two and one-half (2-1/2) pounds of actual nitroger/per 1;0if0 square feet per year in two (2) to four (4) applications during the first year of new planting or if plant material is nitrogen starved. One (1) application should be in early Spring when growth begins. Increase to three (3) pounds of actual nitrogen in following years or as needed to maintain vigorous growth and good color. Complete fertilizers are desired in Spring and Fall. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall monthly cultivate all base groundcover and flower bed areas. Remove trash weekly to a legal disposal area. Water enough that moisture penetrates throughout the root zone, and only as frequently as necessary to maintain healthy growth. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform routine repairs of erosion and other damage to slopes due to normal maintenance conditions. Replace dead and missing plants with plants of equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid for by Landscape Maintenance Contractor. rectify the same within one watering period by adding n. ew sprinklers or new lines. Repairs to system shah be made with originally specified'materials or suitable substitute. Such materials may be charged extra at the Contractor's cost price. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair all damages to irrigation system at his own expense. However, major repairs such as controllers, valves and mainlines, or additional installation items may be charged extra at the current agreed rate. In either case, all repairs shah be made within one watering period. Set and program automatic controllers for seasonal water requirements. If controller enclosures do not incorporate a locking device, Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall install a locking device and give Owner's representative a key to controllers and instructions on how to turn off system in case o[ emergency. E. Irrigation System Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall, on a weekly basis, inspect and repair as required all irrigation heads for full coverage and adjustment. Adjust heads as necessary to minimize over-spray on buildings, sidewalks or other un-landscaped areas. Lateral lines shall be flushed out after removing the last irrigation head or two at each end of the lateral. Should poor coverage of localized areas become evident, the Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall rectify the same within one watering period by adding n. ew sprinklers or new lines. Repairs to system shah be made with originally specified"materials or suitable substitute. Such materials may be charged extra at the Contractor's cost price. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair all damages to irrigation system at his own expense. However, major repairs such as controllers, valves and mainlines, or additional installation items may be charged extra at the current agreed rate. In either case, all repairs shall be made within one watering period. Set and program automatic controllers for seasonal water requirements. If controller enclosures do not incorporate a locking device, Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall install a locking device and give Owner's representative a key to controllers and instructions on how to turn off system in case of emergency. Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 405 - Temecula, CA 92390 [744] 699-0235 Fax: [744] 699-4390 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CSA 143 DIRECTOR, Jeanine R. Overson LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES ~ B. KCFiteEt~K!) I~O'FION: That the Board approve a continual Agreement for Landscape Service to MacKenzie Landscape; and authorize the Chairman to execute same on the Temecula Community Service District's behalf. ~ t~ x I~'ICATION: The County Service Area 143 recommends that the Board accept the contract with MacKenzie Landscape for landscape maintenance for Winchester Creek and Winchester Collection. MacKenzie Landscape has been maintaining CSA 143 areas since December 1, 1989 and is being recommended to continue by Tatsumi and Associates. Tatsumi and Associates have been contracted by CSA 143 to recommend maintenance contractors. Also they were chosen as an alternate through the County Purchasing Bidding Process RFP. We are recommending that MacKenzie Landscape continue the landscape maintenance for Temecula Service District. PURCHASING SERVICES ~. 2980 Washington Street, 9;~504-4698 P.O. Box 1259, Riverside, CA 92502-1259 (714) 275-4937 · FAX (714) 369-9244 · jC 08-] 8-89 I,N.S__T,RUC11ONS TO BIDDERS I, E! Rbquest for Proposal ff 9 4 ] 4 Closing Date .':;P-Dr ] 5, 19 I~ 9:30 RM. Buyer..-Kaz~en P[o.Ouafilicalion -- Unless sisled elsewhere In this doCumenl, you must hll oul end return with your response the Stlached Pfe.qualificellon/Vendor InfOrmalion I~; f6 h'~ q~lTfied- II no lore Is enclosud or there ass no other pru-quRltlicatlon requhemenls stated elsewhere In this document. you may assume you ere prO-qualified, II. Prices/Notallons · All prlces/nolallons musl be Iypewritlen or wrilten in Ink. No erasures permilled. Mislakes shall be crossed out, corrections made adjacent end L~'p"~on signing document Each item shall be bid separately. III. FOrmat -- Use the documents provided. If you decide to submit more than one bid, photocopy our documents. V, 01her Terms end CoRdSlions -- The lares and conditions as indlcaled on the ,'averse side Or this documen~ end/or eftached are a pad of Ibis document and shall apply· Vl. Period of F.m Pricln -- Unless listed olherwlSe elsewhere In this doCumenl, prices shelf be firm for 45 days after the closing date· Variations in manufacturers, design, etc., may be acceptable. bidders are encouraged to ohm them as alternatives; however, Ihe County reserves the right to reject Ihole IiternatlveS as non.responsive. VIII. Melhod of Award -- The Courtly reserves the flghl Io reJecl any or all Offers, Io wane any discrepancy or lechnically end to Spill or make Ihe award In any manner I]elermlned by I~e County to be most advantageous to Ihe Counly. The Courtly recognizes that prices are only one el several criteria to be used in Judging an offer and the Counly Is not legally bound to accept the loweel ofler. IX. Cleat Date/Return To -- The bad response Shall be delivered Io tl~e address above by t:30 p.m. on the closing date listed above. The closing date and lime and ~fit,F.F,'~d~5'er referenced above shall appear on the outside of Ihe sealed envelope. X. Muff Pad Bid Sheell -- Return all Ihree Copies, with your company name printed on the lop of each page. Xl. Deliver to AddJe. ss ~ Products/services bid shall be delivered to ..... THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE PART OF THE RFQIP .,~ PiequalifiCatiOn Form [.I General CoRdilleRa Equipment (R Appendix A* E3 Special CoRdSlions RFQ F~Oeneral Conditions, Materials & Services E) Bid Sheet Equipment I .... [I General Conditions [ D,,Generaf Conditions RFP [] Seep es TO DE COMPLETED REFER ALL INQUIRIES TO BID SECTION BY VENDOR ITEM UNIT NO. QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION EXTENSION PRICE ~!)' " Landscape maintenance services as per '~ ": '/k' the attached appendix A. · ~,.:. ~, (Note:'~',;{"zf the area described herein 9~YOSONV]]ZNSWSVV incorpo'~ed into.:a city, the County reserves the right .to2 'dancel the ~~ ~~' ~ ontract. ) '~'~"'~ ~(;~ 686t z O . is "E~Cu~IOe heet~ is CertifiCation Ihlt Ihe u. nderelgned ~s ;cad and u~eqls~l the lerms I~ ~1 het~, a~ Ihlt Ihe u~m~'l pklplf b tuiy ~u~ Ind c~ml~ed" LINO ~ ~ES8 ZiP ~T ' ., IP EVERYTHIN(~'BEL0~/TO BE. C..O.M__PL._E_.T.__E.D_.._BY VENDOR TOTAL SALES TAX TRANSPORIATION CHARGE IF APPLICABLE CASH DISCOUNT (FROM RECEIPT OF GOODS Orl INVq~CE. WHICHEVER IS LATER.) CASH TERMS tESS THAN 10 OAt3 MLL 8~ CONIK)~R~O NET) Cash discount shell be applied to grand Iotal amounl. DELIVERY: calendar dey~ after receipt or order. Landscape Maintenance Bid Form Riverside Count3, Service Axea 143 l{ancho California Tatsumi & Partners Name of Project Name of Bidder Return to item 1. 2. 3. 4. : WincheSter Creek : MacKenzie Landscape, :Karen Bauer-McNeat Date Due Description Slopes-Planting SlopesiIrri'gation Turf Turf-Irrigation Tract No. : 20130 A California Corporation : 9/15/89 Time Due ]46,295 sL Ir 843 s ~ : 1: 30pm Cost of Item per Month .009 $1,324.00 Total Bid Cost/Month (this parcel/tract) $1,324.00 Disclaimer: ]he units and unit quantities provided above are for urposes of uniform bids Only. 7Acuta~ unils and unit quantiUe~ are .. Ihe responsibility of the individual bidders. Unit prices provided aP~ove by bidder ,sha]l remain tn effect for the duration of Uie .... Project i - · :. :: :. - ;' 2.' '.: ': ' · - '' · ' ::' ..... . .:: ." -".s .........· .... :: .::.!~!i;:':':!'~i:'iT'F::T! App~ndix"B", Project 2 Parcel/Tract 20130 ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 1. All plant material removal or r~placement shall be accon~plished only witIt the approval of the Riverside County Service Area 143. 2. The La.dscape Maintenance Contractor siPall furnish the Riverside Counly Service Area 143 witIt an itetnized estimate for a.y extra work required. lie shall not proceed without authorization from the Riverside County Service Area 143. 3. Additional planting, removal or replacement of planting shall be charged at $ see belowper hour plus materials at the Contractor's cost price. 4. !lourly rate for miscellaneous extra services shall be $see below per hour. 5. Major irrigation servicing ~r danaage caused by acts of God, theR or vandalism shall be charged at $ see below per hour, plus materials at the Contractor's cost price. 6. Any additional charges presented to the Riverside County Service Area 143 shall include the following information: a. Itemized detailed description of tasks involved. b. Names of parties (or persons) perform Lug the work. c. Copy of Riverside County Service Area 143 authorization to do work. Receipts for material costs. COMMENTS: Labor Rates for all extra work: Labor with hand tools: $15.00 / hour Foreman with pick-up truck and hand t6ols: 30.00 / hour Materials: cost plus 15% VENDOR/4aoKenzie Landscape Z~~~~~~~. ~E~ERE~C~ .-, ~~~~in~. · 7.~-Smte~MU~mCA~.~.Ot~s~xwi~. ~ ~ ~R E~ES~Y ~ ~E~ ~ ~E ~S ~ ~S ~DER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~t~ ~y ~ ~ts ~ e~ ~ ~n~ h~ ~s~s ~ · ~E~ ~RMS ~D BY ~ ~R ~E R~E~D UNE~ EX~E~Y ~D ~ ~ Im~r.l~.~.m~m,~,~t/8,~.51~~s 5.1LI~IN~~E~IN~CA~DE~ffiEEO~ETO~E~BEL~.SH~R ~E O~R N~BER ~ ~Rffi ~P~Effi. "' SHIP TO: Riverside County Service Purchase Order BILL TO: THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL IN- VOICES, SHIPRNG PAPERS AND PACK- AGES. 00 PHONE ,' PAGE 2 QUAhERTY UNIT COOE REQ. NO. F.O.E ;. . ..... ,: h--'...r,: ,./, / DESCRIPTION Comgens~tion shall ; 1,324/mo - Winchuiter Creek ;285.-/mo - Brock Homes - R~ncho Las Briuas ;1728.-/mo- Chaparrai aancho Las TERMS: FROM RECEPT OF GOODS OR ~NOICE, WHK;HEVER IS LATER UNIT PRICE RF.Q./RJ=.P. · AMOUNT COUNTY.OF R/VERSIDE Pj~SERVES THE OPTION TO CANCEL THE UNEXPENDED BA~ANC~ OF THIS ORD=R AT ANY TI~ ..,*~,/.. ..- / . PHONE (714) 275-4937 The COunty has dusignated the following individual ~s t_he County Contract Administrator (CCA) Jeanins Overson Service Area 143 County of Riverside 29377 Rancho Calif. Road, Suite 105 Rancho Calif, Callf. 92390 The CCA wall coordinate Lhe County~ contract ~dmini~trative functions. Admiai~tra~ion shall include, receive and approve for paymen~ contrdutor invoice, ins~ec~ Contractor aervices and ~rovide technical guidance us required. Changes to the terms of the Con~rac~ wall be m~de bZ a written change order described in the term8 and conditions ethangee clau3e. SALES TAX 40,044.0 TOTAL AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EQ%)~/'LROAP~I~TYUNITy ETMPLOYER FAX (7 Addendum "A" General Scope of Work SUMMARY DESCRIPTION The work involved which shall be performed includes, but is not limited to, the maintenance of all common areas, including banks, slopes turf, flowerbeds and pathways. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, supervisi6n, equipment, tools, materials, transportation, permits, insurance and taxes in his performance of this Scope of Services. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform maintenance in accordance with the highest horticultural standards keeping the project in a first-class condition. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform the following maintenance services: A. General Maintenance ' .- Landscape Maintenance Contractor or Contractor's representative, along with CSA 143 representative or Landscape Consultant shall make at least twelve (12) general inspections of the premises per year. These persons should be experienced in' landscape maintenance and , preferably, should have an education in Ornamental Horticulture and/or field experience in landscape maintenance. Complete policing (litter pick-up) of all maintenance areas weekly, including landscaping, pathways, flowerbeds and driveways. Landscape Maintenance Contractor ~vill conduct maintenance services at the site as defined in Sections B, C, D and E and at the minimum frequency as defined in Sections B, C, D and E. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall make available emergency service on a 24 hour a day, seven days per week basis. Cleaning and maintenance of all drainage lines and catch basins on an as-needed basis. Complete wash down, sweeping, vacuuming or blowing off of all walks as necessary. This does not include garages or All materials used during the course of the maintenance process shall either conform to CSA 143 approved landscape construction specifications or shall otherwise be acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143. The Riverside County Service Area 143 shall be given a monthly 2record of all herbicides, insecticides and disease control chemicals used. (See attached Pesticide Application Record Form) - see Addendure Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair or replace at his own expense any and all damage to property caused by any act or omission of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor, his employees or his agent. Turf Maintenance Mowing shall be done at least every seven (7) days during the Spring and Fall seasons, and aS needed at other seasons. All cuttings shall promptly be collected and disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to the Riverside County Servile Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. All sidewalks shall be cleaned of grass cuttings, etc. on the same day as the mowing... The height of grass is Subject to the approva! by the Riverside County Service Area 143 and type material planted; however, a height of 1-1/2 inches in winter and two inches in summer is recommended. Apply complete chemical fungus and insect controls as necessary.- If needed, control broad leaf weeds with selective herbicides. In areas where Crabgrass has infested the Turf, apply pre-emergent herbicides such as Dadhal, Balan or Betasan for control, prior to Crabgrass germination. All materials used in this function shall be paid by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Turf shall be watered at such frequency as weather conditions require, to replenish soil moisture below the root zone. Watering shall akvays be done at night. Normally, a total of 1-1/2 inches of water are needed weekly during hot weather. Re-seed and/or re-sod failing Turf areas as .necessary, including labor and materials, if due to the Contractor's negligence. Turf shall be fertilized with a total of four (4) pounds of actual nitrogen per 1,000 square feet per year. Fertilizers shall be paid as an extra by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price as predetermined in the Unit Price section of the landscape maintenance bid forms. If required, remove thatch by verticutting, preferably in the Fall, but otherwise in the Spring. At this time, fertilize with nitrate (N) and over-seed if needed. Over-seeding must precede pre-emergent herbicides by at least four (4) to six (6) weeks. Normally, this means that turf which have been invaded by Crabgrass should be renovated and over-seeded in the Fall and t. reated for Crabgrass control in the following late Winter. Aerify compacted ai'eas to irhprove water penetration whenever needed. Tree and Shrub Maintenance Shrubbery and tree beds shall be edged at least two (2) times per month. Shrub plant material shall be manicured redularly to contain their size in respect to species, size of planter or relative to surroundings, and to the best health of the plant. Shrubs shall not be clipped into balled or boxed forms unless such is required by the design. All pruning cuts shall be made to lateral branches or buds, or flush with the trunk. "Stubbing will not be permitted." Prune trees to select and develop permanent scaffold branches that are smaller in diameter than the trunk or branch to which they are attached, which have vertical spacing of 18" to 48" and radial orientation so as not to overlay one another; to eliminate diseased or damaged growth; to eliminate narrow v-shaped branch forks that lack strength; to reduce toppling and xvind damage by thinning out crowns; to maintain growth within space limitations; to maintain a natural appearance; and to balance crown with roots. Under no circumstances will stripping of lower branches ("raising up") of young trees be permitted. Lower branches shall be retained in a "tipped back" or pinched condition ~vith as much foliage as possible to promote caliper trunk growth (topped trunk). Lower branches can be cut flush with the trunk only after the tree is able to stand erect without staking or other support. Evergreen trees shall be thinned out and shaped when necessary to prevent wind and storm damage. The primary pruning of deciduous trees shall be done during the dormant season. Damaged trees or those that constitute health or safety hazards shall be pruned at any time of the year as required. All trimming litter shall be disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Remove stakes and guys as soon as they are no longer needed. Stakes and guys are to be inspected to prevent girdling of trunks or branches, and to prevent rubbing that causes bark wounds. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all trees and shrubs including labor and material to be paid by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contradtor's Cost price. Keep basins and area between plants free of weeds. Use recommended legally approved herbicides. Avoid frequent soil cultivation that destroys shallow roots. Use mulches to help prevent weed seed germination. 10. Once, early in Spring, and once, late in Spring, fertilize recently established plants with slow release tablets. Avoid applying fertilizer to the rootball and base of main stem; rather, space evenly under plant to drip line. Plant tablets to be 21 gram "blue chip". Apply according to manufacturer's recommendations. All fertilizers shall be paid as an extra by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. 11. Maintain a large enough water basin around plants so that enough water can be applied to establish moisture through the major root zone. When hand watering, use a water wand to break the water force. Use mulches to reduce evaporation and frequency of watering. Watering shall be performed at such a frequency as weather conditions requires, to replenish soil moisture through the major root zone. 12. Remove dead and dying plants and replace with plants of an equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid by the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Flower Bed and/or Herbaceous Groundcover (including slope planting) Maintenance Trim and edge all flower bed and groundcover areas a minimum of two times per month to achieve an overall even appearance. Control weeds, preferably with preoemergent herbicides, but also with selective systemic herbicicles as recommended by a licensed pest control/herbicides advisor. Hoe weeds as little as possible since this may result in plant damage. It will be considered unsatisfactory to allow weeds to grow unabated for more than one (1) week. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all flower and groundcover beds including labor and materials to be paid for by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Apply two and one-half (2-1/2) pounds of actual nitroger/per 1;00'0 square feet per year in two (2) to four (4) applications during the first year of new planting or if plant material is nitrogen starved. One (1) application should be in early Spring when growth begins. Increase to three (3) pounds of actual nitrogen in following years or as needed to maintain vigorous growth and good color. Complete fertilizers are desired in Spring and Fall. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall monthly cultivate all base groundcover and flower bed areas. Remove trash weekly to a legal disposal area. Water enough that moisture penetrates throughout the root zone, and only as frequently as necessary to maintain healthy growth. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform routine repairs of erosion and other damage to slopes due to normal maintenance conditions. Replace dead and missing plants with plants of equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid for by Landscape Maintenance Contractor. E. Irrigation System Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall, on a weekly basis, inspect and repair as required all irrigation heads for full coverage and adjustment. Adjust heads as necessary to minimize over-spray on buildings, sidewalks or other un-landscaped areas. Lateral lines shall be flushed out after removing the last irrigation head or two at each end of the lateral. Should poor coverage of localized areas become evident, the Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall rectify the same within one watering period by adding n. ew sprinklers or new lines. Repairs to system shah be made with originally specifled"materials or suitable substitute. Such materials may be charged extra at the Contractor's cost price. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair all damages to irrigation system at his own expense. However, major repairs such as controllers, valves and mainlines, or additional installation items may be charged extra at the current agreed rate. In either case, all repairs shah be made within one watering period. Set and program automatic controllers for seasonal water requirements. If controller enclosures do not incorporate a locking device, Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall install a locking device and give Owner's representative a key to controllers and instructions on how to turn off system in case of emergency. Riverside County Service Area 443 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 405 - Temecula, CA 92390 [714] 699-0235 Fax: [744] 699-4390 TO: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT SUBMITTAL DATE: July 12, 1990 FROM: CSA 143 DIRECTOR, Jeanine R. Overson SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES ~CF~M'a~i~!) lttOTION: That the Board approve a continual Agreement for Landscape Service to East Bros; and authorize the Chairman to execute same on the Temecula Community Service District's behalf. JUb.s.U,r/CATTOi: The County Service Area 143 recommends that the Board accept the contract with East Bros. for landscape maintenance for The Summitt, Costain Homes, Vineyards and Woodcrest. East Bros. has been maintaining for CSA 143 areas since February 20, 1990 and is being recommended to continue. Tatsumi and Associates have been contracted by CSA 143 to recommend maintenance contractors. Also they were chosen through the County Purchasing Bidding Process RFP. We are recommending that East Bros. continue the landscape maintenance for Temecula Service District. Addendum"A" General Scope of Work SUMMARY DESCRIPTION The work involved which shall be performed includes, but is not limited to, the maintenance of all common areas, including banks, slopes turf, flowerbeds and pathways. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, supervisi6n, equipment, tools, materials, transportation, permits, insurance and taxes in his performance of this Scope of Services. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform maintenance in accordance with the highest horticultural standards keeping the project in a first-class condition. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform the following maintenance services: A. General Maintenance .... Landscape Maintenance Contractor or Contractor's representative, along with CSA 143 representative or Landscape Consultant shall make at least twelve (12) general inspections of the premises per year. These persons should be experienced in' landscape maintenance and , preferably, should have an education in Ornamental Horticulture and/or field experience in landscape maintenance. Complete policing (litter pick-up) of all maintenance areas weekly, including landscaping, pathways, flowerbeds and driveways. Landscape Maintenance Contractor will conduct maintenance services at the site as defined in Sections B, C, D and E and at the minimum frequency as defined in Sections B, C, D and E. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall make available emergency service on a 24 hour a day, seven days per week basis. Cleaning and maintenance of all drainage lines and catch basins on an as-needed basis. Complete xvash down, sweeping, vacuuming or blowing off of all walks as necessary. This does not include garages or All materials used during the course of the maintenance process shall either conform to CSA 143 approved landscape construction specifications or shall other, vise be acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143. The Riverside County Service Area 143 shall be given a monthly 2record of all herbicides, insecticides and disease control chemicals used. (See attached Pesticide Application Record Form) - see Addendure "C" Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair or replace at his own expense any and all damage to property caused by any act or omission of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor, his employees or his agent. Turf Maintenance Mowing shall be done at least every seven (7) days during the Spring and Fall seasons, and as needed at other seasons. All cuttings shall promptly be collected and disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to the Riverside County Servi~e Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. All sidewalks shall be cleaned of grass cuttings, etc. on the same day as the mowing: The height of grass is subject to the approva! by the Riverside County Service Area 143 and type material planted; however, a height of 1-1/2 inches in winter and txvo inches in summer is recommended. Apply complete chemical fungus and insect controls as necessary.' If needed, control broad leaf weeds with selective herbicides. In areas where Crabgrass has infested the Turf, apply pre-emergent herbicides such as Dacthal, Balan or Betasan for control, prior to Crabgrass germination. All materials used in this function shall be paid by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Turf shall be watered at such frequency as weather conditions require, to replenish soil moisture below the root zone. Watering shall always be done at night. Normally, a total of 1-1/2 inches of water are needed weekly during hot weather. Re-seed and/or re-sod failing Turf areas as .necessary, including labor and materials, if due to the Contractor's negligence.. Turf shall be fertilized with a total of four (4) pounds of actual nitrogen per 1,000 square feet per year. Fertilizers shall be paid as an extra by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price as predetermined in the Unit Price section of the landscape maintenance bid forms. If required, remove thatch by verticutting, preferably in the Fall, but otherwise in the Spring. At this time, fertilize with nitrate (N) and over-seed if needed. Over-seeding must precede pre-emergent herbicides by at least four (4) to six (6) weeks. Normally, this means that turf which have been invaded by Crabgrass should be renovated and over-seeded in the Fall and t. reated for Crabgrass control in the following late Winter. Aerify compacted ai-eas to ifnprove water penetration whenever needed. C. Tree and Shrub Maintenance e Shrubbery and tree beds shall be edged at least two (2) times per month. Shrub plant material shall be manicured redularly to contain their size in respect to species, size of planter or relative to surroundings, and to the best health of the plant. Shrubs shall not be clipped into batled or boxed forms unless such is required by the design. All pruning cuts shall be made to lateral branches or buds, or flush with the trunk. "Stubbing will not be permitted." Prune trees to select and develop permanent scaffold branches that are smaller in diameter than the trunk or branch to which they are attached, which have vertical spacing of 18" to 48" and radial orientation so as not to overlay one another; to eliminate diseased or damaged growth; to eliminate narrow v-shaped branch forks that lack strength; to reduce toppling and ~vind damage by thinning out crowns; to maintain growth within space limitations; to maintain a natural appearance; and to balance crown ~vith roots. Under no circumstances will stripping of lower branches ("raising up") of young trees be permitted. Lower branches shall be retained in a "tipped back" or pinched condition with as much foliage as possible to promote caliper trunk growth (topped trunk). Lower branches can be cut flush with the trunk only after the tree is able to stand erect without staking or other support. Evergreen trees shall be thinned out and shaped when necessary to prevent wind and storm damage. The primary pruning of deciduous trees shall be done during the dormant season. Damaged trees or those that constitute health or safety hazards shall be pruned at any time of the year as required. All trimming litter shall be disposed of in a manner and location acceptable to the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the expense of the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Remove stakes and guys as soon as they are no longer needed. Stakes and guys are to be inspected to prevent girdling of trunks or branches, and to prevent rubbing that causes bark wounds. The Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all trees and shrubs including labor and material to be paid by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contradtor's CoS1 price. Keep basins and area between plants free of weeds. Use recommended legally approved herbicides. Avoid frequent soil cultivation that destroys shallow roots. Use mulches to help prevent weed seed germination. 10. Once, early in Spring, and once, late in Spring, fertilize recently established plants with slow release tablets. Avoid applying fertilizer to the ro0tball and base of main stem; rather, space evenly under plant to drip line. Plant tablets to be 21 gram "blue chip". Apply according to manufacturer's recommendations. All fertilizers shall be paid as an extra by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. 11. Maintain a large enough water basin around plants so that enough water can be applied to establish moisture through the major root zone. When hand watering, use a water wand to break the water force. Use mulches to reduce evaporation and frequency of watering. Watering shall be performed at such a frequency as weather conditions requires, to replenish soil moisture through the major root zone. 12. Remove dead and dying plants and replace with plants of an equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid by the Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Flower Bed and/or Herbaceous Groundcover (including slope planting) Maintenance Trim and edge all flower bed and groundcover areas a minimum of two times per month to achieve an overall even appearance. Control weeds, preferably with pre-emergent herbicides, but also with selective systemic herbicides as recommended by a licensed pest control/herbicides advisor. Hoe weeds as little as possible since this may result in plant damage. It will be considered unsatisfactory to allow weeds to grow unabated for more than one (1) week. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform complete insect and disease control on all flower and groundcover beds including labor and materials to be paid for by the Riverside County Service Area 143 at the Contractor's cost price. Apply two and one-half (2-1/2) pounds of actual nitroger/per 1;0if0 square feet per year in two (2) to four (4) applications during the first year of new planting or if plant material is nitrogen starved. One (1) application should be in early Spring when growth begins. Increase to three (3) pounds of actual nitrogen in following years or as needed to maintain vigorous growth and good color. Complete fertilizers are desired in Spring and Fall. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall monthly cultivate all base groundcover and flower bed areas. Remove trash weekly to a legal disposal area. Water enough that moisture penetrates throughout the root zone, and only as frequently as necessary to maintain healthy growth. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall perform routine repairs of erosion and other damage to slopes due to normal maintenance conditions. Replace dead and missing plants with plants of equal size, condition and genus and species of original planting, to be paid for by Landscape Maintenance Contractor. Irrigation System Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall, on a weekly basis, inspect and repair as required all irrigation heads for full coverage and adjustment. Adjust heads as necessary to minimize over-spray on buildings, sidewalks or other un-landscaped areas. Lateral lines shall be flushed out after removing the last irrigation head or two at each end of the lateral. Should poor coverage of localized areas become evident, the Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall rectify the same within one watering period by adding n. ew sprinklers or new lines. Repairs to system shah be made with originally specified"materials or suitable substitute. Such materials may be charged extra at the Contractor's cost price. Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall repair all damages to irrigation system at his own expense. However, major repairs such as controllers, valves and mainlines, or additional installation items may be charged extra at the current agreed rate. In either case, all repairs shall be made within one watering period. Set and program automatic controllers for seasonal water requirements. If controller enclosures do not incorporate a locking device, Landscape Maintenance Contractor shall install a locking device and give Owner's representative a key to controllers and instructions on how to turn off system in case of emergency. COUblI'Y OF HIVEHSIDE ..PUr~"EhASING SERVICES ~'9.80 Washington Street, 92504-4698 Re. Box 1259, Riverside, CA 92502-1259 (714) 275-4937 · FAX (714) 369-9244 · jc 08-18-89 ..,!].:,,!;.,,:.~%El Request for (:~,~ Quotation ff . ;- F,j Request for Proposal ~ ;, ,.;...;, ,, INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 94142 Closing Date..__,S.ept 15, 198_S1:30 RM. BuYer_Kar,_en Phone ~7%-4q'lPE_ Pre-Ouellllcetlon -- Unless stated el.~ewhere In Ibis document, you musl lift oul end rehrrn with your response Ihe ellached Pro-qualification/Vendor Inlormatlon ~ I'~ I~ q'G~llr~ed. II no Ionn Is enclos,d or Ihere ere no other pre-quetlllcallon requhemenls sisled elsewhere In this document. you may assume you ere pro-qualified. II. Prlces/Nolallons. All prices/Relations must be lypewrllten or wrlllen In Ink. No erasures permitted. Mlslakos shell be crossed out, corrections made adlRcenl and r~le"~y'b'T'~on signing document. Each Item shall be bid seperRtely. III. Formal -- Use Ihe d~,cuments provided. If you decide I0 subrail more Ihan one hid. pholocopy our dor. umenls. IV. P~'~frerms/Tax -- All pricing shall he F.O.B, our dock, n~{~lJ~f~la3,~ (e.g., cash terms less Ihsn 20 days should be considered net) excluding applicable lax The ~peya~ornla Solos lax and Is exempt Irom Federal excise lax. In the evenl el an extension error, the unll price shell prevail. V. Other Terms and Conditions -- 1he lerma and conditions as Indicated on the revmse side el Ihls document end/or Ritechad ere e pad el Ibis d0cumenl end shall apply. VI. Pe,iod el Firm Fnc'iE~: Unless aleled olberwlse elsewhere In Ibis documenl, prices shall be Ihm for 45 days alter Ihe closing date, ' VII. S ecilicelion/Chan es -- Wherever breed names ere used, Ihe words "or equal" shall be considered to appnsr end be e pad el Ihe specificslion. If you ere quoting ~me~'~, c,oss oul our nonmenclalura and Inserl yours. If no make or model la stipulated, Insert yours. Atlech applicable SpeClIICRIIOnS end/or brochures. VarlellonS In menulath,era, design. elc., may be ecceplable. bidders ere encouraged Io offer Ihem es alternatives; however. the Counly reserves Ihe~lghl Io rnJect Ihose alternatives as non-responsive. VIII. Melhod el Award -- The Calmly reserves the right Io re'loci any or ell oilera. to waive any discrepancy or lechnlcetly nnd to spill or make the award In any annnor i~'[~m."~'E~ IHe Counly to be meal advantageous Io the County. The Counly recognl?.es thai p,lces a,e only one OI several crllorle Io be used in Judging an offer end the County Is not legally bound Io accefit the lowest otter. IX. CIo~ln Date/Return To -- the bid response Shall be delivered Io the addless above hy 1:30 pm. on Ihe closing dale Ilsled above. The closing dale end lime and ~l:i~ R.~.~jZTT. F.P. ~*d'~5'er rolelanced above shell appear on the outside el Iho sealed envelope. X. Mull Pert BId Shn_ol_9 -- eelurn aft Ihrae copies, wllh your company nerne printed on Ihe lop el each page. XI. Deliver to Address -- Producls/servlces bid shell be delivered to THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENI S ARE PART OF THE RFQ/P :X] Prequnllflcellon Form [3 General Condlfinns Equipment [3 Special Condlllons RFQ FqJ(Geneml Conditions, Meierlois & Services ~ General Conditions [J:43enelal Conditions RFP REFER ALL INQUIRIES TO BID SECTION HEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION Qt Appendtx A E:) Bid Sheet Equipmeal U Samples TO BE COMPLETED · 13Y VENDOrl "' UNIT' PRICE EXTENSION Landscape maintenance services as per the attached appendix A. (Note::faif the area described herein incorporated into a city, the County reserves time right to cancel the contract.) '~' ,~ is "E=fH:utlon hereo~ Is cedlllclsllo. IhRI Ihe undersigned has reed end underslRnds Ihe lares led CoRdilleRa hereel, end lhal Iha underslgned'S pelnclpRI tl lull}, bound led committed;' TYPE OR PmNT EAST BROS. LAN..P_S_C,.~PE SERVZCE COMPANY NAME I 12 EaSt Aviation Road ~r~EEr ADDhESS P. O. Box 1350 MA~UNG ADDnE~ Zt~ Fallbrook, CA 92028 CITY StA~ E ZIP -, Try vie B~-cerr~l. Supervisor NAME DA! E SlG NA~ URE P~ONE~ I 9 ) Z28-9043 FAX ( EVERYTHINe BELOW TO. BE COMPLETED BY VENDOR TOTAL SALES TAX TRANSPORTATION CHARGE IF APPLICABLE GRAND TOTAL 2216.07 CASH DISCOUNT (rnoM RECEIFrl OF OOO DS OR INVOICE, WIIICIIEVErl IS LATER CACTI TERMS tESS THAN ~ DAYS WTLI, BE CONSlOEnEO NET) Cash dlscounl shell be applied to grand totel amount. DELIVERY: calendar days sller receipt of order. 06 '~ ~00 ' 09~ ' ~ '.oT:)'~ET~Z - ~'~'".L 09'51 ZO' 095'~ Z.t, "g9 '~00 ' 6g~ '~;~ d'~'73:..z,b'7~'~z - v~do3'S' ~{;,"06~ ~/.00' 61'~"~Z,, '3d~'aVp~D7 - v.~doyS' iuo| J;;d'' u ~ Itu~li ...,{, ,o ~,t,,~..,.tr{':,",/,V.I,,,,~,.'~ ~ t I ISV)J 1~-t90~ 061~/9; a.(i atoll' amiO 9lul:l ; ul Jalqqli Ju ainuN J S'daVA,qN~A :]HI t.,.q.ujdjeamuN ; S *oN I',um.L , ]3/AH:]S' ~JV3S'dNVI S'2t3/110~9 .ISV] gaau,ud 1' !:un~l~.L ul.-loJ!lu;3. LuF~.uH .un21 PI~, aammmma).!ulA] adu~sl'.mul EASl' 8ROrHERS LANVSCAPE SERVICE 'Alipendlx"l]", ProJecl:_ THE VZNEVARDS Parcel/trac~- ADDITIONAL SEItVIC!~S AND I~,!r~II%'I!IUil, SAIILE EXI'ENSES All rfnnl mnhrlnl rem,n, nl or rrpIncement shnll be nccompllshed nnly ~Hlh Ihe nl,l~rovnl of the Rh'erslcle Count~, SenIce Aren 143. 1he !.nndscnpe I%lnlnhnnnce Cmslrnclor shnll hn'r~l.~h Ihe Rh'ersjde t=omd:y ,~ler~.lce Aren 143 ~sillr nn Ihmh..ed ,slimhie f.r nn.t exf:n work requhed. lie slmll not proceed Hl!!soul nulhorlt. nllon from Ihe Rivershie {=onnl)' SenIce Aren 143. A~h!lllmml pfnnllnft, remotnl .r repine,moot or rlnn!lng shnll be chnrl.,efl hi ~ I 5, 5 0 per hm~r plus molefinis nl the Conh'nclor's cnst price. !lonrl~ rnh rer mlscellnnenus exlrn s~rvlces shnll be S 14.0 0 .... per hour. ~lnl~r h'tlpnelnn sertlch~ rnr dnmnRe cnnsed b~ ncls or (;ml, lht~ gr tnndnllsm shnll be chnrSed nl I 2 5 · 0 0 p~r hour, plus nmfe~lnls nt Ihe Conh'ncfor's cost price. At~ ndellfln,nl chn:ges Frescoled In fhe Rh. erslde ~mmf~ Sen'Ice Aren 1.1.t sfmfl Inchl~le !he Inrormnllhm a. Itemized delhiled dcsct~i~llcm ~f loses inv~lvcd. b. Nnmes ~r !rotlies (or l~ersctn~) petformin~ ihe work. Copy ~[ Rivc~sldc Camfly Service Area 143 nullmriznlion !c~ do wink. ReccJpf~ fi~r mnletJnl c~sfs. CUI~!h!i~N'I'S: ~ ~7 ' 6 0 o° ~ (l~e.al/P3,s"d fiql) qluol~/lse:3 PlO |vlo.L LO' '= :S.l.lq31Ui.qO" S~IgN,.'ZI,IX,':I ~J"lflV~lfltll,qlSl~l (INV f~,~lDIA~l~IS qVNOl,iJflflV ,/'~' Jo //. ilud 6 t - / ~ -~ Z :;aufl ,(.tappiG) l"lllui .1 ~ 6 ' 0 ~c/. (l:)ltll/ia~Jl~d J;Itll) q|uul~Al/::) PIG Iq°.L · - DEC E2 · -AppondiX'D', 21561 ADDITIONAL SEllVICES AND itlrAMIIUItSA!ILE EXPENSES P.6 All plnn! .mhrlal removal or replaee,.ent shall be accomplished .,,ly .llh lbe .ppr.val ef Ihe Rh'crside Courtly Service ~en the I.nndscnpe Mnlnhnnnce Conlrncl.r shall f. rnlsh Ihe Rivershie Co..!y Sen'Ice Area 143 .'ilh lhmlt~d eslimnl~ f.r nny e~fm wink required. Ih shall aol prnce~d .Ifho.t nuthorl~lJon from the Riverside County ~e~ice ~ea 143. .. Addilia.hi pinnil.g, removal or replacement .f planting shall be d. nrged hi $j ~. ~ 0_ plu~ tnnterlals nt the Contrnctor's cost price. I!onrly rnle for mlscellnnemss exlrn servlees shall be $ ~ 4.0 0 .__ per per ttotrr Mnlor h'r|~vnlln. servicing r.r dam,,fie caused I,y ntis or (;od, theft or vnud.llsm shall be d;nrged nt $_2 5. ~ 0 per hm~r, ldu~ materials nt the Co.trnrlor's cost price. At,y .fhllflo..l charges presenled !n If,e Rh'erslde C.ii.ly SetsIce Area 143 sh,,!l h:chs,le the foll.nl ug hnfornmtibn: a. Itemized detailed tlescri!~tlo..f tn.~ks ;nvulv~d. b. Names o[partles (or pcrso,,s) petfar,sslng tl,~ work. e. Copy o[ Rivctsicle Co.nly Service Area 1,13 nulhorlzation to dd worl<. d, Rece;pIs ft, r materln] COMMEN;i'3L /% iN,D~C.,{Eu.' 8'3 ~Z:05 HRILIHG SERVIr:ES CEH " -Landscape '. , Maintenance Bid. Fornl Name of I!hhhr Reh,'. to ._ e P.9 Riverside Cou~dy Service Area 143 ita.cho Califor/da (COn6Z~ma,~'iOYt O~ P~OpO6~e Va~ea 1~-/15/~3tuni&patfners ._EAST BROI'IfERS LANDSCAPE SERVICE ........ : THE SUMMIT-RANCHO HIGHLANDS ~ 'rractr4o. EA3F BROI'HERS LANUBCAI'E SERVICE ~4 !)esctipllnn .T.u~f .......... 1 above : 20643 Co t of Ihm per ~ ontb 493.55 65,806 .0025 764.52 51,355 .Of 513.55 51,355 .0025 128,39 _ Total Bid Co~t/l~fonth (this parcel/tract) · inl~fmen I u t'i d 'i" ~tleip,-vt edib~vearelq 'dfp~eiotunli~m~ld,~ I,: "v .... ~300., 07._ ;'""'"""'"~"' ~.I.~"''' "-"-" .--I~"':~ "' ~.'~. I · Al, pcndix13'. 12:05 HAILIHG SERVICES CEH .EAST 8ROTItERS EANE)SCAF'E SERVICE ProJeel: ....THE SUMMIT-RANCHO P~rcel/rract. 20643 HIGHLANDS 20644 ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND IUrJMI1UItSABLE EXI'ENSES P.8 All plane material removal nr replacement shall be accomplished only -Jth Ihe ni, l, rovnl of the Riverside County Service Area 143, 'lhe !.nnt|.'~cnpe hlnlnhnnnce Lonlrnelor .droll h#rnl.,h Ihe Rivershie Connty Service At'on 143 ~|lh nn lieinlaid e~ltrnnle f.r nny exh'a w.rk reqnired. Ih slmll not proceed ,~[Ihmfl nulhnrlznlion from Ihe Riverside Cmmty Service Area 143. Arhl!llo.nl plnnII,~B, rem6ynl m' rel, lnc~m~n( of planflog shall be cf,nrgrd hi $ I 5~.5 0 pIu9 materials nt Ihe (:onh'nclor'~f co.~( price, _ per hnur Ilonrly rnle roy mlscellnne~us exlrn servlce.~ el, all be ~ 14,0 0 ~ per h-try. MaJor In'!gnflnn Ren'lcl.g ror damaRe caused by nets or Cod, thOR or vnndnllsm shall be chnl~ed nt S . ~_~, ~ 0 .. per hour, plu~ mnlerlnls nt Ihe CoJrlrnclor's cost price, Any nddlflonnl chn~es pre~enlrd In ihe RIverside Cnnnly Sen'Ice Area 143 ~hnX h, clude the tollon-lag hffnrmnll~n: Ilemlzed detailed tlcscrilfllrn~ or tn.~s involved. Nnmes of patties (or I~ersnn,) l,crfornflng lime work. _L_'OMMEN'I'S; WNDO.'S,.. "UC O.S' -COUNTY OF RIVER _'rlEPURCHASE ORDER 1.Packmgd~ahowir~ ~nberandoontentamustsccompeffeechsh~omenL * , ~ . · t~ ; 6.~P.O. IS i PURSUANT TO ll-[ REQt~REMENTS STATED IN THE REQUEST FOR QUOTASqON SIGNED 2. No charge for'mcklr~ ~~/ayage wffi be at~wed except when specffied ~ offier. BY 'IHE VENL ,4/HERE APPUCABLE. 3. No pert~d M~ngs exce~ when N~ctf~sd in order. ~ · ' ?! 7. Out-~-State vendors MUST show CA Board of Eq. Perm~ No. Otherwise sales tax win be deducted. DIFFERENT TERMS BROPOSED BY THE SELLER ARE REJECTED UNLESS listed by CA Dir. Ind. Ret. in CA Adm. Code. 1"ffis 8. Sec. 5194 and Labor Code~ ' 5. UNLESS INDICATED ELSEWHEFE OIHERVVISE TO ADDRESS BELOW. SHOW OUR insurance required and provkte proof of insurance befae be~nn4ng wodc, .., ~HASE O~ER N~BER AND OR~IG ~PARTMEffi. VEN~R B~St BrOs, ~n~scape Service. 112 C~st Aviation Fallbrook, CA 92028 Attn= John Scherf SHIP TO: -.., THIS P.O. HAS BDE~EN B~LL TO: ' ENCUMBERE "'::" DATE AUDITOR ' CONTROLLER Riv. County' Service Area 14P~rchase Order 29377 R~ncho California Rd. 18~0191 Room # 105 Ternsouls, CA 92390 THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL IN- VOICES, SHIPRNG Same As Above PAPERS AND PACK- AGES. PHONE # 0 1/90 12 85 2,38401 82008 DEST QUANTTTY UNIT TERMS: FROM RECEFT OF GOODS O. '"~h fftf~" '~ ~TE" DESCRIPTION Landscape Maintenance Service= for CSA 143 A~l Terms, Conditions and Specifications o~ RFQt94142 and letter dated 1/19/90 by John Scherf are hereby included with full force and like effect as i= set forth herein. Total annual. costs not to 'exceed are The County has designated the following individual as the County Contract Administrator (CCA) Jean=he Overson Service Area 143 County of Riverside 29377 Ranch. Calif. Rd. Suite 105 Temecula, Calif. 92390 As Req'd R.F.Q./R.F.P. d, UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 24,900.00 Rr'E|VED , .~ ! ' e,';' ,/ *, FEB 20-1990 '" HOLD IN DEPT. t D L O0 The CCAwill coordinate the County's contract administrative functions. Administration shall include receive and approve for payment contractor invoice, inspect Contractor services and provide cec~-~ical (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) FRANK ~GPJiN. ~HA~NG ~E~ SALES TAX TOTAL FOR Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 105 - Rancho California, CA 92390 (714) 699-0235 · Fox (7t4] 699-4390 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 23, 1990 June Greek - City of Temecula Deputy Clerk Deborah M. Tharp - CSA ]43 Office Assistant~~ Temecula Conm~unity Service District Agenda Item for July 24, 1990 Please find attached the CSA 143 Staff Report for Annexation to TCSD Zone A for Parcel Map 21592. Tomond Properties. This office request this item to be placed on the Temecula Community Service District. Agenda for August 14, 1990. Should you have any questions on this matter please contact this office. %~'-~FOR ?f) Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 405 - Rancho California, CA 92390 (7t4) 699-0235 · Fax [7t4) 699-4390 DATE: TO: FROH: SUBJECT: July 23, 1990 Temecula Community Service District Riverside County Service Area 143 ~_~ Jeanine R. Overson - Director Report for August 14, 1990 TCSD Meeting Annexation to TCSD Zone A PM21592 Tomond Properties The above tract has requested am~exation to the TCSD for additional services. All legals have been reviewed and approved by Dana Robie of the City of Temecula. The CSA 143 recommends annexation of this area into the TCSD. cc: Dana Robie APPT.TCATION TO THF. T~.M~.CUT.A COMMUNITY' .~,'FTRVTC~R DTSTRTCT Mail or deliver to: Temecu]a Community Service D~strict c/o CSA 143 29377 Rancho C~l~forn~a Road. Sutie 105 Temect,]a, CA 92190 For office use only INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data about the proposed project and site to allow staff to assess this proposal. ~,thm~t thin or4ginsl. s ho,,ndary m~p and metes and hO,,nd~ legs] aescr~Rtton of the sffectea ~re~. ~nd two (2~ complete copies of a]] m~ter~a]s. No other ~]ic~t~on form will he accepted. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO: Annex rn TCSD Zone A (Describe proposal or action requested) APPLICANT: TUnond Properties Telephone: (619) 489-0123 ADDRESS: P.O. Mox 2159 Escondido, CA 92025 CONTACT PERSON: Anthony Polo, Markham & Associates Telephone:(714) 676-6672 ADDRESS: 41750 Winchester Rd., Ste N TenBcula, CA 92390 Describe s ecific boundaries) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ~ Hwy 79 and ~state 15 in Terecula SECornero (29150 Hwy '/9) A. OWNERSHIP: o 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property (circlee NO B. AREA INFORMATION: 1. How many acres or square miles of territory are included in this proposal? 4.54 acres 2. Specifically describe how the property will be improved or develo ed (e.g., number of dwellin units, mobilehomes etc.) N~additiofz/ ' Bldgs. proposed under~21592 3. Specifically describe how the property is presently used (e.g., vacant roves B~cn~.le ~amily residences, etc. ) 4. Population within the area at the present time? 0 5. Number of registered voters within the boundaries? 0 Expected change in population which will result from this proposal? 0 7. Area assessed value? $ 3,000,000.00 8. Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor ' s Parcel Number 922-210-041. 049.043.044 9. Current zoning? CPS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND SERVICES PLAN: (attach additional sheets where necessary) Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. (Note: Refer to Tract N-mhers, Specific Plans, etc.): PM21592wasaDDrovedbvRiversideCounty. Tne mapwasrecordedonMay 18, 1988. PP 9498 & PP 9606 ~ve approvedov;vtb~sn~p. Outline the full range of services which will be extended to the property as a result of this proposal, and the cost of these services to the landowner and/or future residents. Street Lights If street lights are to be installed, list how many, type and intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 LPSV). Aleo, ~tt~ch street 14ght~ng l~yo-t ~rel}~rea bY the re~pon.~hle ~,,~ltc -t~)~ty. ~na -~l~roved bY the Co-nty Trsf[4c ~.ng~neer. 2-55 Watt T,RqV 8000 If parks, medians, drainage facilities, etc., are to be maintained, describe the area(s) to be maintained and level of service to be provided. N/A PROPERTY OWNERS POSITION: 1. How many landowners make up the total ownership of the project area? One How many landowners have been contacted regarding the project 'On~ 3. How many landowners are in favor of the pro~ect? (attach letters of consent from landowners) One 4. How many landowners are not in favor of the project? None NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS: List below the names and address of people to whom notices and communications should be directed· NAME: Tam3nd PrDDerties - Ken Oftedal ADDRESS: P.O. Rox 2159 TELEPHONE: (619) 489-0123 CITY & ZIP: Escondido, CA 92025 NAME: Markham & A~soc~ates-Anthonypolo TELEPHONE: (714) 676-6672 ADDRESS: 4~750 W~n~h~vPA~a. SteN CITY & 'ZAnIP~lo~92390 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: TITLE: Associate DATE: 4-10-90 APPLICATION TO THE TEMRCU;~ COMMUNITY' SERVICES DISTRICT Mail or deliver to: Temecul~ Communi~J Service District c/o CSA 143 29377 Rancho California Road. Sutie ]05 ~emec,,la. CA 92390 For office use only INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data about the proposed project and site to allow staff to · assess this proposal. Submit thi- origin-I, a boundary map and metes ~na ho,,nd. leg~] aescri~tion of the affectea are~. ~nd two (2] complete Qo~ies of all materials. No other ~ap~lication form will be accepted. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO: Annex tn TCSD Zone A (Describe proposal or action requested) APPLICANT: Tcmond Properties Telephone: (619) 489-0123 ADDRESS: P.O. Box 2159 Escondido, CA 92025 CONTACT PERSON: Anthony Polo, Markham & Associates Telephone: (714) 676-6672 ADDRESS: 41750 Winchester Rd., Ste N ~a, CA 92390 LOCATION OF PROJECT: ~Describe s[~cific boundaries) SE Corner o Hwy 79 and terstate 15 in Temecula (29150 Hwy 79) A. OWNERSHIP: 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property (circle~[.S~ NO B. AREA INFORMATION: 1. How many acres or square miles of territory are included in this proposal? 4.54 acres 2. Specifically describe how the property will be improved or developed (e.g., number of dwellin units, mobilehomes, etc.) Nd additioi3/Bldgs. proposed under~ 21592 3. Specifically describe how the vacant, roves ~ags. existingy 2 'cu~_r~a~ B ngle ~a~il residences, etc. ) 4. Population within the area at the present time? 0 5. Number of registered voters within the boundaries? 0 6. Expected change in population which will result from this proposal? 0 7. Area assessed value? $ 3,000,000.00 property is presently used (e.g., 8. · Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor's Parcel Number 922-210-041. 042.043°044 Ce 9. Current zoning? CPS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND SERVICES PLAN: (attach additional sheets where necessary) Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. (Note: Refer to Tract Numbers, Specific Plans, etc.): PM 21592was aDDrovedbVRiversideCounty. The mapwas recorded onMay 18. 1988. PP 9498 & PP 9606are approvedoverthismap. Outline the full range of services which will be extended to the property as a result of this proposal, and the cost of these services to the landowner and/or future residents. Street Lights If street lights are to be installed, list how many, type and intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 LPSV). A]~o, -tt~ch ~treet lighting l~yo,,t ~rel}ared bY the responsible ~ubltc -tt]tty..na ~roved by the County Traffic Rngineer. 2-55 Watt I.pSV 8000 IX] If parks, medians, drainage facilities, etc., are to be maintained, describe the area(s) to be maintained and level of service to be provided. N/A PROPERTY OWNERS POSITION: 1. How many landowners make up the total ownership of the project area? One How many landowners have been contacted regarding the project 'Ona 3. How many landowners are in favor of the protect? (attach letters of consent from landowners) One 4. How many landowners are not in favor of the project? None NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS: List below the names and address of people to whom notices and communications should be directed. NAME .' Tcmond P--roDerties - Ken Oftedal ADDRESS: P.O. Box 2159 TELEPHONE: (619) 489-0123 CITY & ZIP: Escondido, CA 92025 NAME: Markham & Associates - Anthony Polo ADDRESS: 41750 Winchester Road. Ste N CITY & APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: TITLE: DATE: TELEPHONE: (714) 676-6672 ZAnIP~ 92390 Associate 4-10-90 EXHIBIT "A" Annexation No. To Temecula Service District Area No. LAFCO No. Parcels I through 4 and Lots "A" and "B" of Parcel Map No. 21592, as shown by map on file in Book 150 of Parcel Maps, pages 49 and 50, in the office of the Riverside County Recorder, described as follows: Commencing at the centerline intersection of State Highway 79 and La Paz Street (northbound) as shown on said map; thence N57'55'lg"W 326.95 feet along the centerline of State Highway 79 to the Point of Beginning; thence leaving said centerline S32'04~41"W 93.42 feet; thence N59645~42"W 145.00 feet; thence S58e40t56"W 617.06 feet to the most southerly corner of said parcel map; thence N06°19'21"W 667.51 feet along the easterly right-of-way line of Interstate 15 to the southwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 79; thence N32°O4t41"E 126.68 feet to the centerline of State Highway 79; thence S57~55~19"E 835.89 feet along said centerline to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel of land contains 6.39 acres, more or less. See Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. 7-t~ EXHIBIT "~" ' ~,0FESS/~0.4,~/ (./""/ N~ 3 )657 L.A.F, C. NO. ANNEXATION N0. TO TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT ( RIVERSIDE COUNTY ) CALIFORNIA PREPARED MARCH 20~ 1990 BY MARKHAM AND ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT "A" Annexation No. To Temecula Service District Area No. LAFCO No. Parcels I through 4 and Lots "A" and "B" of Parcel Map No. 21592, as shown by map on file in Book 150 of Parcel Maps, pages 49 and 50, in the office of the Riverside County Recorder, described as follows: Commencing at the centerline intersection of State Highway 79 and La Paz Street (northbound) as shown on said map; thence N57'55~19"W 326.95 feet along the centerline of State Highway 79 to the Point of Beginning; thence leaving said centerline S32°04~41"W 93.42 feet; thence N59°45t42"W 145.00 feet; thence S58°40t56"W 617.06 feet to the most southerly corner of said parcel map; thence N06'19'21"W 667.51 feet along the easterly right-of-way line of Interstate 15 to the southwesterly rtght~ of- way line of State Highway 79; thence N32°04'41"E 126.68 feet to the centerline of State Highway 79; thence S57'55~19"E 835.89 feet along said centerline to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel of land contains 6.39 acres, more or less. See Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. f EXHIBIT H~ffit4CI~J~ POINT ' ?~,GFESSIO,~,~ N~3 )657 ~F CM-\~~ L.A.E.C. NO. ANNEXATION NO. TO TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT IN ( RIVERSIDE COUNTY ) CALIFORNIA P.M.2159:> P.M.K.150/49-50 POR. SEC. ' IgRANCHO TEMECULA) I:~,T. BS.,R.:SW. PREPARED MARCH 20,1990 BY MARKHAM AND ASSOCIATES IE N Corporation Port Offic~ 8ox 2159 · ENil ituildin9 , 613 West Valley Parkway, Suite 270 , April 12, 1990 P.2-.'2 Telephone (619} 489-0123 i Escondido, California 92025 Re;" Par .Crest Plaza: PiN- 2151P TO Whom Zt Hay Concern; Tetraton Corporation, gives Harkham and Associates permis~sion tO process, file, sign 8.nd pick up all pertaining documents on our beh;alf for this project. Zf there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us. Thank you. Sincerely, TERRATON CORPORATION · 0hn C. Raymond"J President JCR/en Riverside County Service Area 443 JEANINE R. OVERSON. DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 405 - Rancho California. CA 92390 (744) 699-0235, Fax (714] 699-4390 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 10, 1990 Temecula Community Service District~/~_~_~__~~ Riverside County Service Area 143 Jeanine R. Overson - Director / Report for 3uly 24, 1990 TCSD Meeting Annexation to TCSD Zone A PM23335 Bedford Development Company The above tract has requested annexation to t, he TCSD for additional services. All legals have been reviewed and approved by Riverside Road and Survey Department and by Dana Robie of the City of Temecula. The CSA 143 reconnnends annexation of this area into the TCSD. APPT,TCATTON TO THE T~M~.CUT,A COMMUNTTY .~RVTCF. S DT~TCT Mail or deliver to: Temecu]~ Communi~J Service District c/o CSA 143 29377 R~ncho Californ/~ Road. Sutie 105 Temec,,]~. CA 92390 For office use only IN~ODUCTION: The questions on this fom are designed to obtain sufficient data about the proposed project and site to allow staff to assess this proposal. Submit this orlg~na]. a ~undary map and metes ana k~unds legal description of the ~ffectea ~re~. ~nd two (2] complete copies of all m~teria]s. No other app]{c~tion form will be accepted. ~PLICATION IS H~REBY, MADE ~O: (Describe pro~..sal or action re.quested) Annex to the Temecula Community Service District Parcel Map 23335 and a portion of APN 910-200-0714. APPLIC~a~T: Bedford Development Company T~%~hone: (714) 676-5641 ADDRESS: 28765 Sinq]e 0ak Dr., Suite 200, Temecu]a, CA CONTAC~ PERSON: Robert B. Kemb]e Tele hone: (714) 616-8U42 ADDRESS: 28765 Single 0ak Dr., Suite 250, Temecu]a, CA 9239~ LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Describe specific k~undaries) North of Winchester R0ad(Hwy 79) and West of Margarita Road. A. OWNERSHIP: 1. Is the applicant ~erty owner in the area of the proposed project (circle) NO 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property (circle) YES e B. ~aEA INFOPa~ATION: How many acres or square miles of territory are included in this proposal? 14.95 acres Specifically describe how the property will be improved or proposes 5 lots for commercial development = 10.18 acres. 3. Specifically describe how the property is presently used (e.g., vacant, groves, single family residences, etc. ) Parcel 1=Vacant ~rassland, Parcel 2= 3 structures- commercial development. 4. Population within the area at the present time? None 5. Nu~r of registered voters within the boLmdaries? None 6. Expected chan e in population which will result from this pro~sal? Mone 7. ~ea assessed value? $ 4,985~900.00 8. Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries' by Assessor's Parcel Number Parcel 1: a portion of 910-110-031.0areel 2 = a portion of 910-200-014 9. Current zoning? C-P-S (Scenic Hiqhwav C0mmerical) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND SERVICES PLAN: (attach additional sheets where necessary) 1. Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible· · Tract Numbers, Specific Plans, etc.): Parcel Outline the full range of services which will be extended to the property as a result of this proposal, and the cost of these services to the landowner and/or future residents. Condition of approval for PiM. 23335, that the site be annexed to The Temecula Community Services District for street lighting maintenance. 3. If street lights are to be installed, list how many, tyl0e and intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 .EPSV). Al~o. .tt~ch street l~ght~ng l~yo-t prepared h~ the responsible p-~lic ut.i~t~0. ~na ~proved by the County Tr.ff~c ~ng~neer. Parcel 1: volt- 135 watt L.P.S.V. 22500 LU per Count~ Traffic Engineerinq Plan Approval. Parcel 2 = existing street lights on the corner of Winchester and Ynez, and by the driveway on Ynez-L.P.S.V. 4. If parks, medians, drainage facilities, etc., are to be maintained, describe the area(s) to be maintained and level of service to be provided· N/A PROPERTY OWNERS POSITION: 1. How many landowners make up the total ownership of the project area? Two How many landowners have been contacted regarding the project Two 3. How many.landowners are in favor of the project? (attach letters of consent from landowners) Two 4. How many landowners are not in favor of the project? Nnnp NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS: List below the names and address of people to whom notices and communications should be directed. Nima(E: Robert B. Kemble, Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc~I'ELEPHONE: (714) ~76-F~(~42 ADD~SS: 28765 Single Oak Dr., Suite 250 CITY & ZIP:Temecula, CA N~=m0:: Greg Erickson - Bedford Properties ADDRESS: 26765 Single Oak Dr., Suite 200 CITY & APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: TITLE: DATE: TELEPHONE: (714) 676-5641 Z~Tem~cu] a, CA 92390 Gr Erickson~~ B~d~ford Properties ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Rancho California, California 92390 Revised July 2, 1990 October 31, 1989 J.N. 24157-M1 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION NO. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PARCEL I That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 114 and 118 of the "Temecula Land and Water Company" as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 8, Page 359 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of Ynez Road with the southeasterly line of said Lot 114 as shown on a map filed in Book 58, Pages 75 through 83 of Records of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County; thence along said centerline of Ynez Road North 41°51'29'' West 487.90 feet; thence North 48°08'31'' East 50.00 feet to the most southerly corner of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 21361 filed in Book 139, Pages 89 and 90 of Parcel Maps in said office of the Riverside County Recorder; thence along the southeasterly line of said parcel map through the following courses: North 56°56'24'' East 388.54 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1000.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 147.86 feet through a central angle of 8°28'18"; thence tangent from said curve North 48°28'06'' East 92.85 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 5000.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 471.47 feet through a central angle of 5°24'10"; Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates Exhibit "A" Annexation No. Temecula CommUnity Services District Revised July 2, 1990 October 31, 1989 J.N. 24157-M1 Page 2 of 3 thence leaving said southeasterly line, non-tangent from said curve South 41°51'52'' East 280.58 feet to the northwesterly line of "Well Site No. 108" as described in a document recorded May 28, 1982 as Instrument No. 92787 of Official Records in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder; thence along said northwesterly line South 48°08'08'' West 26.25 feet to the most westerly corner of said "Well Site No. 108"; thence along the southwesterly line of said well site and the southeasterly prolongation thereof South 41°51'52'' East 155.00 feet to the centerline of said Winchester Road; thence along said centerline South 48°08'08'' West 874.79' feet to the most southerly corner of said Lot 118; thence along said southeasterly line of Lot South 48°07'48'' West 243.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 114 CONTAINING= 11.42 Acres, more or less. PARCEL 2 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 1 and of Lots "A" and "B" of Parcel Map No. 19677 filed in Book 135, Pages 85 and 86 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Parcel 1; thence along the northwesterly line of said Parcel 1 South 69'23'23" West 100.73 feet and South 56°55'31'' West 320.11 feet to a point distant along said northwesterly line North 56°55'31'' East 98.60 feet from the most northerly corner of the property granted to the State of California May 30, 1986 as Instrument No. 126013 of Official Records in said office of the Riverside County Recorder; Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates Exhibit "A" Annexation No. Temecula CommUnity Services District Revised July 2, 1990 October 31, 1989 J.N. 24157-M1 Page 3 of 3 thence South 41°52743'' East 323.09 feet to a point in a course in the southeasterly line of said Parcel 1 shown on said parcel map as "North 48°08'33'' East 403.00 feet" distant thereon North 48°08~24'' East 15.88 feet from the southwesterly terminus thereof; thence continuing South 41°52'43" East 1.40 southeasterly line of said Parcel Map No. 19677; feet to the thence along said southeasterly line through the following courses: North 53°10~09'' East 120.95 feet; thence South 41°51'35'' East 54.71 feet to the southeasterly line of Lot 114 of the "Temecula Land and Water Company" as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 8, Page 359 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California; thence along said southeasterly line North 48°07'48'' East 339.64 feet to the centerline of Ynez Road as shown on said parcel map; thence along said centerline North 41°51~29" West 304.34 feet; thence South 48°08'31'' West 50.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 3.53 Acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part here of. L.S. 3__,,27 EXP. 6-30-92 ~Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 PO.~. 2 aO. 5,S' ~6. 2_~ ' PARCEL l : CONTAINIMG II. 4e AC. .~ ~, , ~ L.S. 3527 ~ , LAWRENCE t. ~ACON E P. - - o L,5. 3~7 ~ ~~ VICINITY ~HIB~ '~' ~ e o~ cA~~ ~ ~S. ~ A~~ LE~ ~r.l:, ~ II' SHEET I Of ~ SHEDS ' TY P~E~L E~INEERS, P~NNERS & SURVEY~S FIELD BOOK JOB NO e4~157 ~~OR ~/~Y DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 30, 1990 ~' Temecula Community Service District Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road. Suite t05 - Temecula, CA 92390 [7t4] 699-0235 Fax: [714] 699-4390 Riverside County Service Area 143 . Jeanine R. Overson - Director~~/Z~/~ Staff Report for August 14, 1990 TSCD Meeting Completion of Process for Dedication Tract 22593 Rancho Solano The CSA 143 requests the TCSD to accept the Encroachment Permit for the above tract, therefore, enabling the CSA to commence maintenance on these areas. This will complete the Process for Dedication. The Encroachment Permit is the only legal document in this dedication as the City Road Department Right-of-Way is the only area of maintenance. The Encroachment Permit has been prepared by Mr. Albert K. Crisp, City of Temecula Permit Engineer. Riverside County Service Area JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite t05 - Temecula, CA 92390 [714] 699-0235 Fax: [714] 699-4390 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 30, 1990 June Greek - City of Temecula Deputy Clerk Rebecca L. Stein - CSA 143 Supervising Of~tant I Temecula Community Service District Agenda Items for August 14, 1990 Please find attached the CSA 143 Staff Report for Completion of the Process for Dedication for Tract 22593, Rancho Solano. This office requests this item to be placed on the Temecula Community Service District Agenda for August 14, 1990. Should there be some reason this item can not be approved on this date please notify this office immediately. The Developer has been notified the CSA will assume maintenance responsibility when approved by the Temecula Community Service District Board. PERMIT NO.: E/~(::~ "~ HA (Nm Of Road) CI~ OF TEMECU~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA VIA L4/IRA ~NCROACHM6NT PERMIT e~e~E F~Hr~Wo 7r~cu~, cA ~z~o ~rl~.'A~c/~7' re 24-hour Emergency Telephone Number: (fl z~) ~gY"OZ-~,~ TEMEOULA, CALIFORNIA Jv/,Y /990 Subject to the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 499 and all the terms, conditions, restrictions, specifications, standards, and rules and regulations of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside or any other public agency written below or printed as general or special provisions or incorporated heroin by reference. PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO/HAIA/TAiA) f ~,4~7~4rG~ /iv 71y-E Pr~r-E T ~'/6ffr~-OF-WA/ L/$TEf TEMECULA trench policy shall apply~. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS INDICATED ON PAGE 2 OF THIS PERMIT SHALL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED. TRAFFIC control shall be to most recent edition of W.A.T.C.H. Manual and as follows: IS A C.~II~/]'7otO d;'F. 7'~ts /'~,44~T, The following specifications and/or standards, a copy of which are attached to this permit, are hereby referred to and made a pad hereof as fully as if they are set out heroin. County Standards and/or specifications for: Special Provisions: Temecula R-l, R-3, R-4, R-12, R-14, R-15, R-19, R-20, R-22, R-23, R-24. A copy of this permit is to be kept at the site of the work and must be shown on demand to any authorized representative of the City Engineer. ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER/TENANTS SHALL BE NOTIFIED 72-HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. This permit is to be strictly construed and no work other than that specifically mentioned above is authorized hereby. Performance of the work shall be deemed to be acceptance by the Permittee of all terms and conditions of this permit and Ordinance No. 499. This permit shall be void unless work herein contemplated shall be completed before: - .,t9 ~ A4~HA/T~NANcE Permittee File Inspection Police Dept. :: .~ENGI EE.R Albert K. Crisp, Per~ Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 105 - Rancho California, CA 92390 [714) 699~235 · Fax (7t4) 699-4390 DATE: July 24, 1990 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June Greek - Cit3 of Temecula Deputy Clerk Debo~'ah M. Tharp - CSA 143 Office Assistant ~~ Temecula Community Service District Agenda Item for Aug. 14, 1990 Please find attached the CBA 143 Staff Report fox Annexation to TCSD Zone A for Iract 23299 & 23267, Presley of San Diego. This office recluest this item to be placed on the Temecula Cc, m~unity Service District Agentia for August 14, 1990. Should you have any questions on this matter please contact this office. Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite ~05 - Rancho California, CA 92390 [714] 699-0235. Fax [7t4] 699-4390 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 24, 1990 Temecula Community Service District Riverside Count)' Service Area 143 Jeanine R. Overson - Director Report for August 14, 1990 TCSD Meeting Annexation to TCSD Zone A Tract 23299 & 23267 Presley of San Diego The above tract has requested annexation to the TCSD for additional services. All legals have been reviewed and approved by Dana Robie of the City o~ Iemecula. The CSA 143 reconunends annexation of this area intc~ the ICSD. cc: Dana Robie APPT,ICATION TO THR TRMRCU;.A COM~ITY SRRVTCRS DISTRTCT Mail or deliver to: Temecu]a Community Service District c/o CSA 143 29377 R~ncho California Road. Sutie 105 Temecul~. CA 92390 For office use only INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data akM3ut the proposed project and site to allow staff to assess this proposal. Submit this original. a boundary map and metes and ~unds legal description of the affected ~rea, and two (2] complete copies of a]] materials. No other application form will be accepted. ~PLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO: Annex to TCSD zone A (Describe proposal or action requested) APPLICANT: Pres]ey of San Dieq0 ADDRESS: 15010 Ave, of Science Suite 200, 'San Dieq0, CONTACT PERSON: Ravm0nd A. Casey A~DRESS: same as applicant Ael~Flh2%ne: (619) 451-6300 Telephone: (619) 451-6300 LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Describe specific kM)undaries) East of Loma Linda Rd.. north of Pa]a Rd,, south of Hwy. 79 and west of Narqarita Rd. (see vicinity l]ap) A. OWNERSHIP: 1. Is the applicant ~e~y owner in the area of the proposed project (circle) 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property (circle~ NO B. AREA INFORMATION: 1. How many acres or square miles of territory are included in this proposal? 203.12 acres Specifically describe how the property will be improved or developed (e.g., number of dwelling units, mobilehomes, etc.) 600 single - family detached homes and 232 multi-family dwelling units Specifically describe how the property is presently used (e.g., vacant, groves, single family residences, etc.) vacant Population within the area at the present time? Nu~r of registered voters within the kM3undaries? Expected change in population which will result from this proposal? 1848 7. Area assessed value? $ 3,2]8,638.00 'B. Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor ' s Parcel Number 926-160-010. 011,012, 013 9. Current zoning? A-i-IO DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND SERVICES PLAN: (attach additional sheets where necessary) Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. (Note: Refer to Tract Numbers, Specific Plans, etc.): VestinqTentative Tract |~ps 23267 & 23?99 and EIR Outline the full range of services which will be extended to the property as a result of this proposal, and the cost of these services to the landow~ler and/or future residents. See attached sheet If street lights are to be installed, list how many, type and intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 LPSV). Al-~o. ~tt~ch street l~ght~ng l~yo,,t ~re~red bY the re~ons~ble p,,h]ic uti lity. ~nd ~ap~roved by the County Tr. ffic Rngineer. 119-8000 LPSV and 17-22,500 LPSV for TM 23267 5-22,500 for TM 23299 If parks, medians, drainage facilities, etc., are to be maintained, describe the area(s) to be maintained and level of service to be provided. See attached sheet PROPERTY OWNERS POSITION: 1. How many landowners make up the total ownership of the project area? 1 - corporation How many landowners have been contacted regarding the project c0rD0rati0n' is aware of situation 3. How many landowners are in favor of the project? (attach letters of consent from landowners) 1 4. How many landowners are not in favor of the project? 0 NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS: List below the names and address of people to whom notices and communications should be directed. NAME: Preslev of San Diego c/o Raymond Casev ADDRESS: 15010 Ave. Of Science 8200 TELEPHONE: (619) 451-6300 CITY & ZIP: 5. D. 92128 NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: CITY & ZIP: APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: Ra~~d A,JC~a'se~ TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: TITLE: Project Manaqer DATE: February 6, 1990 C. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND SERVICES PLAN: The Old Vail Ranch will provide the following services to its residents: Regional Park "A" Regional Park "B" Neighborhood Park "B" Refuse Collection Street Lighting 11,761 20 61,680 96 59,203 04 9,000 00 6,379 30 $148,024 50 This is a per year cost. We have submitted a budget to the CSD, I have attached a copy for any further reference. The following are the areas to be maintained by the CSD. Please see attached map for the designated areas. Entry Ways Channel Slopes Neighborhood Park "B" Maintain aerator Regional Park "B" Neighborhood Park "A" Class A & B Class E Class A & B Class A & B Class A & B RIverside County Service Area t43 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 105 Temecula, CA 92390 (714)699-0235 December 13, 1989 Mr. Raymond A. Casey Presley of San Diego 15010 Avenue of Science #200 San Diego, California 92128 In February 1990, Riverside County Service Area 143 Advisory Committee will hold a Speclal Heeting to develop the budget for the 1990/91 fiscal year .(July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991). This meeting is open to the public, ...... - ...... ~'. It is our understanding you are annexed't~6' th~'CSA'l.~nd may require service during the 1990/91 fiscal year. In orde'r to receive m~),:Fs~yices within your development during the fiscal year l~90/'~r~'{r. hese ar~.~S ~ be identified. If r~ere will be any sub- owners o,r merchant builders ~ir. hin this period, or if there is ~. change of , ~ | /,.~'*" following**~nformat~oni, b~'~??~dm;y~:lS,::lO,91L If we do not informatloh~yO(t~-*p~,pe~ y*_; '*'! *t, re~etve any of the reqUest~ ~"* .'..; ,*..'., ',~*'~i-~*.."~ ' ·' .....: ~' .~ .:: *'. ,- ~ '~' ' New Trac~ #' s '~' '0~' ........... '~ ................................ Tract Name: """' ~-V~tl. Ranch " Developer/Address and/o~o~tact PersOn lr~filr) Ave- rFF ~r~enrp tf~Cgl .~.11. ca 9~l~rehone# Service Fnnctton'. ENTRY ~YS Hedians ] Parkw~s I S 1 ODeS IHOm~ents (A~9) a-q-63nn Location located in Unit 1 f, Unit 2 (htghltghtpd in yellow) Acreage or square footage of maintenance 3~.000 (Unit '1) Existing cost of maintenance none at this time Projected cost of maintenance during FY 90191 $9.750 " Class A & MEDIANS/PAR[WAYS/SLOPES/MONUMENTS CHANNEL SLOPES Location lO ft. slope on hoth sides of channel Acreage or square footage of maintenance 20,100 Existing cost of maintenance none at this time Projected cost of maintenance during FY 90/91 $500.00 Class E NEIGHBORHOOD PARK B WITH RESERVOIR PARES OR RECREATION FACILITIES (types Re. casual, sports, etc. ) Location Snuth end of project - next to reservoir Acreage or square footage of maintenance Existing cost of maintenance none at this time Projected cost of maintenance during FY 90/91 $27,101.52 Class A & B REGIONAL PARK "B" PARES OR RECREATION FACILITIES (types is. casual, sports, etc.) Location located in Unit 3 (highlighted in orange) Acreage or square footage of maintenance 514,008 Existing cost of maintenance none at this time Projected cost of maintenance during FY 90/91 $30.840.48 Class A & B RESERVOIR PARES OR RECREATION FACILITIES (types is. casual, sports, etc.) Location in reservoir - to maintain aerator Acreage or square footage of maintenance n/a Existing cost of maintenance none at this tfme ProJected cost of maintenance during FY 90/91 $5.000 ,: CSA 143 90/91 Budget Letter December 13, 1989 Page 2 Parks or Recreation Facilities (t, yuesi.e. casual, snorts etc.) Location Acreage or square footage of maintenance Existing cost of maintenance Projected cost of maintenance during FY 90/91 Drainage Chnnnels General location of chazmels; acreage/sq. footage Type of maintenance required Existing cost of maintenance Projected cost of maintenance during F¥ 90/91 Refuse Collection Number of Units 200 Existing cost of maintenance none at thts ttme Projected cost o~ maintenance during F Y g0/91 $9,000.00 Street l.i~httn~ Number and intensity(ie 8,000 or 22,500 lumen) of lights ~1 nnJt~ W ~000 lumen. 45 units e 22,500 lumen Existing energy charges none at this time Projected energy charges during FY 90/91 $6,379.30 If you wish the Service Area to take over service on this item you must include it in your budget. CSA 163 90191 Budget Letter , December 13, 1989 Page 3 N-mberofUnits Developed - iI~$W=~ built out by June 30, 1991 No. of tmits 200 Projected development time frame construction on unfts wt11 start tentatively tn September. 0ccupancey ts targeted to start tn December. N~m~berlll ~its Developed -!e~lttOl~ 11wellingJa built ou~ by June 30, 1991 No. of units fUA Projected development time frame Number nfUnit~ Developed - R.~tne~alTnd,,~trtal!lnt~sbuilt OUt by June 30, 1991 No. of units N/A Projected development time frame Other (i.e., ball park lighting, facilities) Neighborhood Park B wtll have bathroom facilities Please enclose as it elL l all (8-112 l lll identifying property as public use (i.e. park, open space, etc.), with your budget letter to help this office identify the area of concern. Please mail to Jeanine R. Overson, Director, CSA 143, 29377 Pancho California Road, Suite 105, Temecula, Ca 92390. We appreciate your immediate response and assistance. The CSA has a developers package and CSA 143 Landscape Standards Book/et ($10.00 charge for booklet) available at this office. 1his package includes information required to turn over street lights, Riverside County approved Grant and Easement Deed forms. the Process for Dedication and other items each developer must have to correctly turn over property to the CSA for maintenance. Should you require this package or the landscape Booklet please call this office. Very truly yours, Director Enclosures: Landscape Maintenance Methodology I I COMPOSITE MAP OLD VAIL RANCH APPLICATION TO THE TRMRCU;A COMMUNITY' SRRVTCRS DISTRICT Mail or deliver to: Temecula Community Service District c/o CSA 143 29377 Rancho California Road. Sutie 105 Temec,,1 ~. CA 92390 For office use only INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data about the proposed project and site to allow staff to assess this proposal. Submit th~s orig~na], a boundary map and metes and bounds legal description of the affected area. and two (2] complete cop~es of all materials. No other application form will be accepted. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO: Annex to ICSD zone A (Describe proposal or action requested) APPLICANT: Presley of San Dieq0 ~Ael~Fl%~ne: (619) 451-6300 ADDRESS: 15010 Ave, of Science Suite 200, 'San Dieqo, CONTACT PERSON: Raymond A. Casey Telephone: (619) 451-6300 ADDRESS: same as applicant LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Describe specific boundaries) East of Loma Lir, da Rd.. north of Pala Rd,, south of Hwy. 79 and west of I.larqarita Rd. (see vicinity Ilap) A. OWNERSHIP: 1. Is the applicant ~e~y owner in the area of the proposed project (circle) 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property (circle)~ NO B. AREA INFORMATION: 1. How many acres or square miles of terr.itory are included in this proposal? 203.12 acres 2.. Specifically describe how the property will be improved or developed (e.g., number of dwelling units, mobilehomes, etc.) 600 single - family detached homes and 232 multi-family dwelling units .Specifically describe how the property is presently used (e.g., vacant, groves, single family residences, etc.) vacant Population within the area at the preseHt time? 0 Number of registered voters within the boundaries? 0 Expected Change in population which will result from this proposal? 1848 7. Area assessed value? $ 3,2]8,638.00 8. Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor's Parcel Number 926-160-010,011,012, 013 9. Current zoning? A - 1 - 10 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOS~ ?~ND SERVICES PLAN: (attach additional sheets where necessary) 1. Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible· (Note: Refer to Tract Nu~ers, Specific Plans, etc.): Vesting Tentative Tract |~ps 23267 & 23?99 and Outline the full range of services which will be extended to the property as a result of this proposal, and the cost of these services to the landowner and/or future residents. See attached sheet If street lights are to be installed, list how many, type and intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 LPSV). Also. -tt-ch street l~ghting layout pre~.red bY the res~onslble ]}ublic utility. and ~3~roved by the County Traffic Rngineer. 119-8000 LPSV and 17-22,500 LPSV for TM 23267 5-22,500. for TM 23299 If parks, medians, drainage facilities, etc., are to be maintained, describe the area(s) to be maintained and level of service to be provided. See attached sheet PROPERTY OWNERS POSITION: 1. How many landowners make up the total ow~ership of the project area? 1 - corporation How many landowners have been contacted regarding the project c0rp0rati0~' is aware of situation 3. How many landowners are in favor of the project? (attach letters of consent from landowners) 1 4. How many landowners are not in favor of the project? 0 NOTICES ~ND COMMUNICATIONS: List below the names and address of people to whom notices and co~ununications should be directed. NAME: Preslev of San Diego c/o Raymond Casev ADDRESS: 15010 Ave. Of Science//200 · TELEPHONE: (619) 451-6300 CITY & ZIP: S.D. 92128 NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: CITY & ZIP: ~a~PLICA~T'S SIGNA%~JRE: Ran~dA.C~a~ev~ TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: TITLE: Pro]ect Manaqer DATE: February 6, 1990 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANNEXATION TO TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 TOGETHER WITH ALL OF PARCELS 3 AND 4, AND LOTS B,C AND E OF PARCEL HAP NO. 18993, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 134 AT PAGE 13 THROUGH 18, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND REDHAWK PARKWAY, BEING PORTIONS OF RANCHO TEMECULA AND THE LITTLE TEMECULA RANCHO, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT "E" OF SAID PARCEL HAP; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "E" AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, SOUTH 83°17'14'' WEST 724.13 FEET (SOUTH 83°16'35'' WEST 724.11 RECORD); THENCE NORTH 63°29'08'' WEST 282.49 FEET (NORTH 63°29'11'' WEST 282.48 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 67~56'39'' WEST 532.16 FEET (NORTH 67~56'54'' WEST 532.09 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 70°45'07'' WEST 452.94 FEET (SOUTH 70~45'05'' WEST 452.95 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 69~37'57'' WEST 336.10 FEET (NORTH 69°38'35'' WEST 336.25 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 48°37'35'' WEST 247.92 FEET (NORTH 48~37'40'' WEST 247.90 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 84~38'51'' WEST 208.85 FEET (NORTH 84~37'55'' WEST RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 81~32'12'' WEST 315.87 FEET (SOUTH 81°33'05'' WEST 315.84 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 61°46'30'' WEST 215.98 FEET (SOUTH 61~44'20'' WEST 216.03 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 20~23'31'' WEST 286.39 FEET (SOUTH 20~22'30'' WEST 286.32 RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 21~12'29'' WEST 171.33 FEET (SOUTH 21~17'35'' WEST 171.27 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 40~04'09'' EAST 439.26 FEET (SOUTH 40~03'40'' EAST 439.27 FEET RECORD); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "C" OF SAID PARCEL HAP, SOUTH 37°25'57'' WEST 300.07 FEET (SOUTH 37~27'00'' WEST 300.09 FEET RECORD); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "C", SOUTH 86~24'33'' WEST 121.39 FEET (SOUTH 86~20'45'' WEST 120.05 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT "B" OF SAID PARCEL HAP, AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRALANGLE OF 57~20'50'' A DISTANCE OF 1201.07 FEET (57~24'35'' 1202.39 FEET RECORD); THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, NORTH 36~14'37'' WEST 824.55 FEET (NORTH 36~14'40'' WEST 823.61 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLYALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°38'09'' A DISTANCE OF 479.80 FEET (19~37'57'' 479.71 FEET RECORD); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3 AND ALONG THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN SAID PARCEL 1 SHOWN AS NORTH 16°36'43'' WEST 1059.60 FEET ON SAID PARCEL MAP, NORTH 16°36'28'' WEST 639.85 FEET (NORTH 16~36'43'' WEST 640.82 FEET RECORD) TO THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO PARCELS "A" AND "B" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 3033 RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 382852 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 4695.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 16~36'28'' WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°40'57'' A DISTANCE OF 301.76 FEET (03°40'52'' 301.64 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 20~55'00'' WEST 202.00 FEET (201.61 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1650.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04~18'17'' A DISTANCE OF 123.97 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 16~36'43'' WEST 676.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61~36'43'' WEST 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79; THENCE LEAVING SAID COMMON BOUNDARY LINE AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, NORTH 16~36'43'' WEST 71.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY 79; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 73°23'17'' EAST 2016.10 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE, SOUTH 16°36'43'' EAST 71.00 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO PARCELS "A" AND "B" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 3034 RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 382853 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, SOUTH 15~37'50'' EAST 79.38 FEET (SOUTH 16~36'45'' EAST 108.29 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRALANGLE OF 10~54'53'' A DISTANCE OF 304.80 FEET (09°51'27'' 275.27 FEET RECORD); THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 26~32'43'' EAST 99.17 FEET (SOUTH 26~28'10'' RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17°21'41'' A DISTANCE OF 484.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09~11'02'' EAST 129.77 FEET (SOUTH 09~06'29'' EAST RECORD) TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 2268.88 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 09~11'02'' EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11~24'40'' A DISTANCE OF 451.87 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP, SOUTH 21°15'25'' EAST 791.22 FEET (SOUTH 21~15'55'' EAST 791.19 FEET RECORD); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, SOUTH 00~30'11'' EAST 568.12 FEET (SOUTH 00~30'33'' EAST RECORD) TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 4 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, SOUTH 86~58'49'' EAST 141.46 FEET (SOUTH 86~59'50"EAST RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 70°00'16'' EAST 199.61 FEET (SOUTH 70°01'17'' EAST 199.56 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 88~22'03"EAST 192.99 FEET (NORTH 88~21'44'' EAST 192.98 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 80°53'15" EAST 250.08 FEET (SOUTH 80°53'58'' EAST RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 53°07'36'' EAST 146.87 FEET (SOUTH 53~07'41 EAST 146.84 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 74~57'41'' EAST 578.71 FEET (SOUTH 74°58'19'' EAST 578.70 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 56°42'44'' EAST 654.77 FEET (NORTH 56~42'21'' EAST RECORD) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "E" OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 16~38'44'' EAST 885.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 205,960 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETOAND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. TRACT NOS. 23299 & 23267 WRH/AWU 4-21-90 J.N. 225-64 ALEXANDER W. URQUHART, ~II R.C.E. 30958 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION C,'½/, ~/ Te,~ecu/~ ANNEXATION TO TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 TOGETHER WITH ALL OF PARCELS 3 AND 4, AND LOTS B,C AND E OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18993, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 134 AT PAGE 13 THROUGH 18, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND REDHAWK PARKWAY, BEING PORTIONS OF RANCHO TEMECULA AND THE LITTLE TEMECULA RANCHO, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT "E" OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "E" AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, SOUTH 83°17'14'' WEST 724.13 FEET (SOUTH 83°16'35'' WEST 724.11 RECORD); THENCE NORTH 63~29'08'' WEST 282.49 FEET (NORTH 63~29'11'' WEST 282.48 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 67o56'39'' WEST 532.16 FEET (NORTH 67~56'54'' WEST 532.09 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 70~45'07'' WEST 452.94 FEET (SOUTH 70°45'05'' WEST 452.95 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 69~37'57'' WEST 336.10 FEET (NORTH 69~38'35" WEST 336.25 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 48°37'35'' WEST 247.92 FEET (NORTH 48~37'40'' WEST 247.90 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 84~38'51'' WEST 208.85 FEET (NORTH 84°37'55'' WEST RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 81~32'12'' WEST 315.87 FEET (SOUTH 81~33'05'' WEST 315.84 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 61~46'30'' WEST 215.98 FEET (SOUTH 61~44'20'' WEST 216.03 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 20°23'31'' WEST 286.39 FEET (SOUTH 20°22'30'' WEST 286.32 RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 21o12'29'' WEST 171.33 FEET (SOUTH 21~17'35'' WEST 171.27 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 40~04'09'' EAST 439.26 FEET (SOUTH 40~03'40'' D~'~ L::~.i' 7~_'F~.. 7~E',', _~rq.~2~C~ CC.N'T_L~!~NG ~L~NG T~__T_ LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "C" OF SAID PARCEL MAP, SOUTH 37°25'57'' WEST 300.07 FEET (SOUTH 37°27'00'' WEST 300.09 FEET RECORD); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "C" SOUTH 86°24'33'' WEST 121 39 FEET (SOUTH 86~20'45'' I · WEST 120.05 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT "B" OF SAID PARCEL MAP, AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRALANGLE OF 57°20'50'' A DISTANCE OF 1201.07 FEET (57024'35" 1202.39 FEET RECORD); THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, NORTH 36~14'37'' WEST 824.55 FEET (NORTH 36~14'40'' WEST 823.61 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19~38'09'' A DISTANCE OF 479.80 FEET (19°37'57'' 479.71 FEET RECORD); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3 AND ALONG THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN SAID PARCEL 1 SHOWN AS NORTH 16°36'43'' WEST 1059.60 FEET ON SAID PARCEL MAP, NORTH 16°36'28'' WEST 639.85 FEET (NORTH 16°36'43'' WEST 640.82 FEET RECORD) TO THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO PARCELS "A" AND "B" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 3033 RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 382852 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 4695.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 16~36'28'' WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°40'57'' A DISTANCE OF 301.76 FEET (03~40'52'' 301.64 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 20~55'00'' WEST 202.00 FEET (201.61 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1650.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04~18'17'' A DISTANCE OF 123.97 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 16~36'43'' WEST 676.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61~36'43'' WEST 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79; THENCE LEAVING SAID COMMON BOUNDARY LINE AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, NORTH 16°36'43'' WEST 71.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY 79; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 73~23'17'' EAST 2016.10 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE, SOUTH 16°36'43'' EAST 71.00 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO PARCELS "A" AND "B" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 3034 RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 382853 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, SOUTH 15~37'50'' EAST 79.38 FEET (SOUTH 16~36'45'' EAST 108.29 FEET RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRALANGLE OF 10~54'53'' A DISTANCE OF 304.80 FEET (09~51'27'' 275.27 FEET RECORD); THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 26~32'43'' EAST 99.17 FEET (SOUTH 26°28'10'' RECORD) TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17°21'41'' A DISTANCE OF 484.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09~11'02'' EAST 129.77 FEET (SOUTH 09°06'29'' EAST RECORD) TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 2268.88 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 09~11'02'' EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11~24'40'' A DISTANCE OF 451.87 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP, SOUTH 21~15'25'' EAST 791.22 FEET (SOUTH 21~15'55'' EAST 791.19 FEET RECORD); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, SOUTH 00~30'11'' EAST 568.12 FEET (SOUTH 00~30'33'' EAST RECORD) TO ANANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 4 OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, SOUTH 86°58'49'' EAST 141.46 FEET (SOUTH 86~59'50"EAST RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 70~00'16'' EAST 199.61 FEET (SOUTH 70~01'17'' EAST 199.56 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 88°22'03"EAST 192.99 FEET (NORTH 88~21'44'' EAST 192.98 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 80°53'15'' EAST 250.08 FEET (SOUTH 80°53'58'' EAST RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 53°07'36'' EAST 146.87 FEET (SOUTH 53°07'41 EAST 146.84 FEET RECORD); THENCE SOUTH 74~57'41'' EAST 578.71 FEET (SOUTH 74°58'19'' EAST 578.70 FEET RECORD); THENCE NORTH 56~42'44'' EAST 654.77 FEET (NORTH 56~42'21'' EAST RECORD) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "E" OF SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 16~38'44'' EAST 885.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 205.960 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETOAND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. TRACT NOS. 23299 & 23267 WRH/AWU 4-21-90 J.N. 225-64 ALEXANDER W. URQUHART 7 ~ Ii R.C.E. 30958 Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 105 - Rancho California, CA 92390 (7t4] 699-0235, Fax [7t4] 699-4390 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 18, 1990 June Greek - City of remecula Deputy Clerk Deborah M. Iharp - CSA 143 Office Assist. ant~~ Temecula Co~nunity Service District Agenda Item for July 24, 1990 Please find attached the CSA 143 Staff Report for Annexation to TCSD Zone A for Tentative Tx'act 23125, Ranpac Engineering. This office request this iteh~ to be placed on the Temecula Community Service District Ag~nda for August 14. 1990. Should you have any questio~. on this ~,~atter please contact this office. Riverside County Service Area 143 JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 405 - Rancho California, CA 92390 [744] 699-0235 · Fax [744] 699-4390 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECI: July 18, 1990 Temecula Community Service District Jea~zne R 0 e~ on D~ector Report fcr August !4, 1990 TCSD Meeting Annexation to tCSD Zone A Tentative Iract 23125 Ranpac Engineerin~ Ihe above tract has requested annexation to the ICSD for additional services. All lega!s have been reviewed and approved by Dana R~hie of the City o£ lemecula. Ihe CSA 143 ;e,_'ommends annexation of this area into the ICSD. ~'c: Dana Robie · AF'R 17 '90 14:52 FROM F~AI.~PAC EI~,,~IMEEP, ING COMMUNITY 8~RVICM~ nTeTRTCT Mail or deliver to: Temcula Community Service district c/o CSA 143 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 105 Temecula, CA 92390 For office use only INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data about the proposed project and site to allow staff to assess this proposal· Submit this original. a boundary map and metes and bounds legal ~escription of the aff.ecte~ area. and two (2) cgmplete copies Of al~_material~. No other application form ~i.l.~ be accepted. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO: (Describe proposal or action requested) The city of Temecula ~or~nnex~ti~n of Vestin~ Tentativ~ Map 23125 into the Temecula Community service district_ for maintenance of open s~ace ~ots. Annex t~ TO~D Z~n~ A APPLICANT: RanDac Engineering Telephone: (714~ 676-7000 ext.32~ ADDRESS: 2~4~7 ~nterDrise Circle. W~st, Temecula. CA 92390 _ CONTACT PERSON: Dave Gilber_t Telephone: (714) 253-3359 ADDRESS: 19762 Mac Arthur Blvd. Irvine. CA 92715 LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Describe specific boundaries) Northeasterly corner of Butterfield stage Road and De Portold.Road (legal description attache~) ._ A. OWNERSHIP: 1. Is the applicant a proper.._t__owner in the area of the proposed project (circle~YES_jNO 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property (circle~ NO AREA INFORMATION: How many acres or square miles of territory are included in these proposal? 90 Specifically describe how the property will be improved or developed (e.g., m~her of dwelling units, mobilehomes, etc.) R-1 Residential subdivision co~tainin~ 212 dwelli.ng units· .. _. Specifically describe how the property is presently used (e.g., vacant, groves, single family residences, etc.)_ Site is presently vacant e Population within the area at the present time? 0 Number of registered voters within the boundarieS?_.. Expected change in population which will result from this proposal? 510 persons Area assessed value? $ 2,~78.000 Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor's Parcel Number ~9) APN 926-330-0Q4 and APN 926,070-020 ~. Current zoning? RA - 2~ (O!rent~y in Re-7. onq, Droces~ · thr~ case No. 5122. Riverside County) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND SERVICES PLAN: sheets where necessary) (attach additional Describe the proposed projecC in as much detail as possible. (Note: Refer to Tract Numbers, Specific Plans, etc.) Tentative Tract No. 23.125 a residential _ subdivision Environmental Impact Report ~o. 263 Was prepared in connection with proposed subdivision Outline the full range of services which will be extended to the property as a result of this proposal, and the cost of these services to the landowner and/or future residents. A fully ~mproved residentia~ d~velopment with I I I ~.street lights; 3andscap~ng, refuse collection. etc. ~]ope maintenance: weed controlmowing etc. If street lights are to be installed, list how many, type and intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 LPSV). Also attach street l~ghtinu ~a~out prepared by the responsible Dublit utility and aperoved by the_ County Traffic Engineer. 47-120 volt 55 watt T..P.S.V. 8000 T~ 12-120 VO_lt 13B wat~ L.P.S.V. 22.500 LU ApproveS. street lj4ht plan per Riverside C~unty Road beD=. iS enclosed. 4. If parks, medians, drainage facilities, etc., are to be maintained, describe the area(s) to be maintained and level of service to be provided· 8 acre park site easterly.part of site~ lands. taped slopes adjacent to Butter~ield Stage Road and De Port. old Road plus recreational trails all dedicated to C.~S.D. Generalmain- tenance of[ark site parking lot and also wee~_ control mowing, triming weed control, etc. PROPERTY'owN~R~ PO~TION: How many homeowners make up the total ownership of the project? one (Sterling Ru/lders) Mow many landowners have been contacted regarding the project? all HOw many landowners are in favor of the project? (attach letters of consent from landowners) all Mow many land owners are not in favor of the project? _ none NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS: List below the names and address of people to whom notices and communications should be directed. N~ZE: Ranpace E~ineerin~ (P. Rev) ..TE~EPHO~FE: f714) 676-7000 ADDRESS: 27447 Enterl0rise Circle W. CITY & ZIP ~emecula. CA 923~Q NAME: S=erlina Builders (Dave Gilbert) ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (714] 253-3359 19762 MacAthur Blvd. CITY & ZIP ~~. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: ,, · TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: DAVID TITLE: DATE: TOTAL F'~'3E . 003 * * ,t COMMI~{ITY 8~RVICR8 DISTRICT Mail or deliver to: Temcula Community Service district c/o CSA 143 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 105 Temecula, CA 92390 For office use only INTRODUCTION: The qUestions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data about the'proposed project and site to allow staff to assess this proposal. Submit this original, a boundarY map and metes and bounds legal description of the. a.ffe.c_t_e_d. area. and two (2) cpmple~e Copies of ale.materials.... No other appl.igation form ~ill be accepted. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO : (Describe proposal or action requested) The city of Temecu.la ~Qr.Ann~x[t.ion o~ Vesting Tentativ~ Map 23125 into the Temecula Community service d~Strict_ fo_r maintenance of open sp~ce lots. Annex ~n TC~D Znnp A _. APPLICANT: RanDac Engineering Telephone:_(T14) 676-7000 ext.3.2.~ ADDRESS: 2Y4~3 Enterprise Circle. West,_ Temecula. CA 92390 _ CONTACT PERSON: Dave Gilbert Telephone: (714) 253-3359 ADDRESS: 19762. Mac Arthur Blvd. Irvine. CA 92715 LOCATION OF PROJECT: (Describe specific boundaries) N_oztheaster~y corner of Butterfield stage Road and De Portola.Road (legal description attache~) ._. A. OWNERSHIP: proposed project ( i 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property (circle~ NO AREA INFORMATION: How many acres or square miles of territory are included in these proposal? 90 Specifically describe how the property will be improved or developed (e.g., number of dwelling units, mobil.homes, etc.) R-1 Residential subdivision co~tainin~ 2~2 dwelling units. .. Specifically describe how the property is presently used (e.g., vacant, groves, single family residences, etc.)_ Site is presently vacan~ Population within the area at the present time? 0 Number of registered voters within the boundaries? 0 Expected change in population which will result from this proposal? 510.p~rsons Area assessed value? $ 2 ,_97s, 090 Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor~s Parcel Number fg} APN 926-3~0-004 a/~d APN 926-070-020 ,i thz"U cas_e .No~· 5122, R,tverg. ide .County) . _ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND SERVI6E$ PLAN: (attach additional !' sheets where necessary) ~ 1. Describe the' proposed project in as much detail as possible. (Note: Refer to Tract Numbers, Specific Plans, etc.) Tentative Tract No. )3.125 a residential subdivision Environmental ImpaC_t Report .N-q. 263 was pr.epared in_connection with propos.e.d subd.ivision .. 2. Outline the~ full 'range of services which will be extended to the property as a result of this proposal, and the cost of these services to the landowner and/or future residents. _ A fully improved r_esidential development with I 8 street lights; landscaping, refus_e. col. lectionj etc. ~] ope maintenance: weed control mowing etc. If street lights are to be installed, list how many, type and intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 LPSV). Also attach street ]ightinu layout prepared by the __. responsible public' utility and app.~oved by the_ County ~r_affic En~ine_er. 47-120 volt 55 watt L.P.S.V. 8000 LU. 12-120 vo_lt 135 wa~t_t. L.P,S.V. 22~500 LU ADDrove_d. street l_ight.plan per Riverside Co_unty Road DeBt. is enclosed, 4. If parks, medians, drainage facilities, etc., are .to be maintained, describe the area(s) to be maintained and level of service to' be provided· 8 acre park site easterly part of ~ite~ lands_caped slopes adjacent to Butter~eld Stage Road and De Port. old Road plus recreatignal trails all dedicated to C..S.D. General main- tenance of park site parking lot and also weed control mowing, t~iming weed control, etc. PROPERTY'ow~R~ PO~ITION: How many homeowners make up the total Ownership of the project? one (Sterling B~ilders) How many landowners have been contacted regarding the project? all How many landowners are in favor of the project? (attach letters of consent from landowners) all_ How many land owners'are not in favor of the project? _ none NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS~ List below the names and address of people to whom notices and communications should be directed. NAMe: Ranpace En~ineerin~ (P_. Rev} ..TELEPHONE: J714) 676-700Q ADDRESS: 27447 Enterlorise Circle W. CITY & ZIP ~emecul.a, CA 9239Q NAME: Sterlin~ Builders (Dave Gilbert) ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (714] 253-3359 ~PLIC~T ' S ,. TYPED OR PRINTED-N~: DAVID. ~ ~ .... - - -, ....... DATE: ~ - 15 ~o + + T',"TF~L F'AGE . 003 ' ~ wIXIBIT ww~. AI~EXATION TO TF~ECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT Those portions of the Rancho Pauba, in the County of Riverside, State of California, which Rancho was granted by the government of the United States to Luis Vignes by patent dated January 19, 1860 and recorded in Book 1, Page 45 of Patents, Records of San Diego County, California, and being a parcel of land more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road with the centerline of De Portola Road, as shown on Record of Survey recorded in Book 83, Pages 63 through 75 of Records of Surveys on file in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County; THENCE along the centerline of De Portola Road, North 56'24~47" East, 254.55 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave southeasterly and having a radius of 4400.00 feet~ THENCE northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 12°19~39" an arc distance of 946.68 feet~ THENCE North 68°44~26" East, 907.66 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 30'18~53" an arc distance of 634.91 feet~ THENCE North 38'25~33" East, 400.73 feet~ THENCE leaving the centerline of De Portola Road on a line bearing North 20'38~33" West, a distance of 1482.96 feet~ THENCE South 42'42~43" West 1649.90 feet~ THENCE South 68'23~57" West 1618.53 feet to a point in the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road; THENCE along the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road, South 22'57~33" East a distance of 1271.93 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel contains 90.04 acres, more or less. (See Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.) ~2 Ne L85697 'f~ . pATRiC~Z~J""a?XK ~. scazrr,-v-/~ LS 5(597 Exp: 9/30/91 EXHIBIT ANNEXATION TO TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT Those portions of the Rancho Pauba, in the County of Riverside, State of California, which Rancho was granted by the government of the United States to Luis Vignes by patent dated January 19, 1860 and recorded in Book 1, Page 45 of Patents, Records of San Diego County, California, and being a parcel of land more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road with the centerline of De Portola Road, as shown on Record of Survey recorded in Book 83, Pages 63 through 75 of Records of Surveys on file in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County; THENCE along the centerline of De Portola Road, North 56°24'47'' East, 254.55 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave southeasterly and having a radius of 4400.00 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 12°19'39'' an arc distance of 946.68 feet; THENCE North 68°44'26" East, 907.66 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 30'18'53" an arc distance of 634.91 feet; THENCE North 38'25'33" East, 400.73 feet; THENCE leaving the centerline of De Portola Road on a line bearing North 20'38'33" West, a distance of 1482.96 feet; THENCE South 42'42'43" West 1649.90 feet; THENCE South 68'23'57" West 1618.53 feet to a point in the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road; THENCE along the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road, South 22'57'33" East a distance of 1271.93 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel contains 90.04 acres, more or less. (See Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.) ..~ ~. LS5697 ~<,.,N ~ PATRICK J.4CHEF~E~R LS 5697 Exp: 9/30/91 CITY OF TEMECULA ANNEXATION MAP COMMUNITY SERVICE ## ' tlJ TO DISTRICT 90.04 acres-~ P.O.B.~ INTERSECTION DE POitTOLA Rr 8k BUTTERRELD STAGE RD. F~R RS. 83/63- 75 / TRICK ,a. SC W.O. 144-05 L33.,1 L44,1 TR. 23125 Q BN. I.O'TAGGED ~.M. K)O/ 18-198 R-S.83/6~-15. t~TN, Sh'C. tO, TSS, te~W COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT TE:I',41='CULA, CALIFORNIA A PORTION OF THE RANClIO PAUBA, RIVERSIDE COUNTy, CALIFORNIA RANPAC ENGINEERING CORPORATION LAFCO NQ. E,,vH/~/T 'Z~''