HomeMy WebLinkAbout073190 CC AgendaPastor Tim Riter
Rancho Christian Church
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, MuRoz, Parks
Certificate of Appreciation:
Traffic Controller Program S-U-pporters
speak, please. come forward and .lllll~ Pllli'"
ttveCm~'il ~mt, to tim Item. TI~e is a. five. (5trninute tim
Illted under. .C/M,,,:,p, kt-'Cilildi, are ~.to be ~mnd all
:~:by one rgaAI caltvote, There wI~bm rwaw,~.~r~sion oftheme Vr~rns
'__-~ofthe CJtV~mquest mpecmc ~wnm be removed'from the
1.1" i: · .~, te wMve'l~ raiding of the text of *all ordinances included
in the agenda.
'RECOi,fL~t&,~ATtON:
2.1
AdOlrc an ordinance entitled:
_ON, PiIiiRTY LOCa'; ON TIE :NORTiNIST
~: OF ItA~A :ROAD All) STATE tIIHNVA Y
3
~e FreewW~,ldabl~~e Agreement and authorize the
S
RECO~ATION:
-AuUmrize the CWy Idanager to enter into a lease agreement
between the City of Ternecula .and VVindsor Partners - Rancho
IrKJustr~ for office space Iotated art Windsor Park 1, 43180
Business Park Drive, Suite 200, for a period. of five months.
6
Trayel AD!~r~ f~
-6.1
Approve plrdcipalJon of Idayor FieMid J, Perks with the Valley
Group for the purlrowe of traveling to Washington, D,C, to meet
with congressional mpmsentltivee and other officials rebated to
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Plot Plan No. 2, a revised permit for county Plot Plan No.
'11222, based on the findings contained in the staff report and
subject to the conditions of approval as amended by the Pinning
commission on July 16, 1990.
e2
Approve Tentative Parcel No 23430, Revised No 1, based on the
findings contained in the County Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of approval with the deletion of Road
Condition 125.
C/TY MANAGER REPORT
Next meeting: August 14, 1990, 7:00 PM, Ternecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, Cafifornia
07DIm0
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB# TITLE: Standard Ordinance DEPT HD
r4TG: 7-31-90 Adoption Procedure CITY ATTY
DEPT: C.C1. CITY MGR
Prepared by Deputy City Clerk June Greek
RECOMMENDA T/ON:
Approve a policy to place an item on each agenda which allows the City Council to
waive the reading of the text of all ordinances on the agenda.
BACKGROUND:
In an effort to simplify the procedure Council must go through on the adoption of
ordinances we recommend this addition to each Council agenda which will allow all
ordinances to be either introduced or adopted with one motion. This item will be
automatically inserted in the Consent Calendar portion of the City Council agendas in
the future if it meets with your approval. When an ordinance is introduced, the City
Attorney will read the title only before Council acts. When an ordinance is placed on
the agenda for second reading, it may be placed on the Consent Calendar with the
addition of this agenda item.
FISCAL IMPACT.'
None
ORDINANCE NO. 90.-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINteD
IN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. ~563, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM
R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO CPS (SCENIC HIGHWAY
COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCAT~-n ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 79
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning law
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application land use
district as shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official
Land Use map for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as many be mended
hereafter from rime to time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of
Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in affect the zone or zones as described
in Change of Zone No. 5563 and in the above rifle, and as shown on zoning map attached hereto
and incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City
Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
posted in at least three public places in the City.
SECTION 3. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of
its adoption.
PASSF-r}, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 31st day of July, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 90-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TE/vI~t~t.~LA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 90=04
PERTAINING TO CONSOLmATED FEES FOR LAND USE AND
BRL&TED FUNCTIONS.
~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FO'HOWS:
SECTION 1. City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference cerUtin portions of the
Non-Codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 671. Ordinance NO. 671
is hereby amended to read as follows:
*The City Council of the City of Temecula may adopt by resolution a schedule of fees
for land use and related functions. The City Council may subsequently mend from time to time
such schedule of fees by resohtion."
SECTION 2. RF:VF-RABII.1TY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining pans of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. The City shall cenif~ to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be posted as required by law.
~ETION 4. ~.~l~C-l'lv~- r)ATF. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED titis 14th day of July, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
A'frP_~f:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
3/Otdsg0-14
].
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
XO
XX
X2
- X3
X4
:L5
Z6
Z7
].8
Z9
20
2Z
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
3X
32
33
34
35
36
3"7
38
39
40
4].
42
43
44
45
46
4'7
~e Board of Sapen'bon of the ComaiT of B. Itasli Orddu,
SECHONI. Odbamcel~71bbenl~ammdedmmdatbBomm
The purpose of this ordinenoo is to provide for the aonsolidation of
oer~uin sahodules of Zoos related to the 1And us~ miters as provided
Zor ~n the seperete ordinenoes, resolutions end rules oZ the County
of Riverside mntionod hereih, The Beenine of any particular vord or
phue appearing henin shaXl be der, aratned by roLeForm t.o rat
ord:Lnance, resolution, or ruXe to vhtch LI: relates. Shou3.d any roe
provi. dmd here:Ln be ruJ, ocl-.:tneaXLd Oz~ unmnforcmabXe, reich dmt:erm.tnatton
mlaal. l. not: allot, t: 1:ha vai. ldl~-y of aXX rmi. nXncJ fee provimXonm,
3.
1
2
3'
4
5
6
7
8
9
ZO
Z2
Z3
Z4
Z8
17
Z9
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
27
28
29
3O
31
32
33
34
ORDINANCE 671.4
S~'.ON 2. ORDINANC/NO. 34S FgF, S
· he fees rot Ordinance No. 348, relating
land use shall be as follows:
(a)
~he folioring fees shall be paid to the
plannlng DIrector and deposited in the
general fired, the L'tmcl of the Flood
Control District: or agenoy that provides
~he flood hazard repoz'c, the
appropriate road or gas tax fund, and
the Parks Department fund:
aBBMZI ~^ P~lDn4n- P,!aJa/4on-
a. Oensral~
. J. l~lannlnq DegarUent
111. ioe~DePebvamra (If · Roed
Condition Is Appealed)
Casprehenslve Transportation
Plan
1, ~lanAinq Delmrt:sent
LL . ......Zavlronsen~,al Xealth
iti. Fire DaMresent
b. !rL..o~d.. Coatrol Distri~
d, load Del~,-taant (traffic study,
required_)
e, loadDepazt:asa~:-
Ccmpreh.e~s..ive Transportation plsn
Fiscal Year
1990-91
328
215
438
26
2746
19
336
145
155
641
220
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
· ) .)17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Yeu
199(~91
a3)
Con'44tional U~i_XZT3,t~
a. General. Fund
3815
11. ~nvirormental Healt. b
167
Fire
531
24
8ball equal 1 · 5 j,~ ',-~_ "" "
teLLmated/-~-T
.__.,~.-~ .*~.:t to · max:laxm ~
-
e. Rgmd De;mx'taent (tra~Rlc study,
Road Department -
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
435
S
651
641
3O5
(4)
li. Znvtrormntal Health
: 'ill. Fire Department,
lv. Bulldlnq end Safety
b. rlood Co~tz'ol District
plus $5 par lot or site
c. Road Departmsnt....(gsneral)
3533
167
531
24
600
5
735
1
2
3
·
S
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
ORDINANCE 671.4
Final Yeax
199(~91
Fee
plus $2 per 1.or or sits
~,c~r2--.-__, · ,~f ~o a maximus total
~ ~ ~ -~ 000
s. Rc~d Department (traffic s~mdy, if
required) .............
f., ]toad Department -
Cosprehensivs ?r~nsport~.tion Pl.~ .....
r~n,411. t~nsl Use
~ ~rkl
ii. Invirormenr~sl Wealth
ill. fire Department' ' _.
iv. Building sad 8~lety ......
(s)
b. lloodC~mtrol DistriCt
plus Sip or lot or si~e
c. Road HS~L'U~nt fqenerei) J
plus $2perlot or site ....
2
.. 641
.... 283
3190
167
531
24
67
435
S
73S
641
4
ORDINANCE 67L4
F[~sl Year
1990-91
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
9
lO
Z2
13
Z5
16
-
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
(6)
(v)
(s)
g. R~md Dspartssn~ -
CO~r_..O. mn.S..ive ~rans~orU~ion Plan
Compnhesive ~ans~orUtioa
ii. ....~i..~.._._nmmnt~l Ssalth-
ili...~i.rS..tm~artmmnt '~.
b. Road Oq~rmmst (tntttG study,
r~qulnd)...
c. Road Omparmmn~: -
Compr~_._._~__i.v_e_~ranspomtion Plan
ii, Znvironmmstsl Health
ili..~!_r~_..._.Dspar~,msnt
b. Smad kpartmnt (traffic stay, if
c. it~md Dslmrtmsn~ -
CmsprshensiVs Transls~~-
255
261
19
113
21
352
113
641
28
307
642
5
ORDINANCE 671.4
199~91
'1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
,
(9)
tii. Fire Departsent
b. Road Department
e. Parks Department
d. Road Department -
I
---[--
........ 1
.............. I"'
4128
36
366
368
355
Coa)rebeUive ~:8n~porUtlon Plea
ti. lavironaenUl Health
Ill. FLreDeparUont.
"'.J_zt~ent
d. Road Departsant -
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
ii. Fire Departsant
b. Road Departsent
c. Road De;arment
required)
330
(traffic study,
43.4g
36
366
368
355
340
3906
273
96
105
641
6
1
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
13
13
14
15
16
17
')~ 18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ORDINANCE 671.4
d. Road Department: -
Cosprehensi_ve...~por~at:ion Pla~.__.__
(13) Biv~-e4 Pe~I,LM Wh~,,,h bau~ra *
a, General Fund
~-)q .~4-M
rire De~r~ment:
b. Road De~4rtmmst:
o. goad oeSmruwmt: (mrf/o study.,
required)
d. Road Oeida-Csent: -
~ -~ ~ ? ~ [T~LC~,TDortat:ion Plan
Per appli~ut:ion
iii. Buildinq and Safety
Road DeperUent: -
Cospnhensive
Trunsportat:ion Plan
if
Cosprehensive Tranmportat:ion ..
Plan
(Direc~or*s Hearing for
Outdoor Adver~lsing)
._l~..r kpplicat:ion
'1
Fiscal Year
1990-91
..22
590
94
X55
641
47
253
262
31
2O
21
7
:t
X
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
Z1
12
Z3
Z4
15
Z6
')
Z9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
199~91
PlOt: Plxn WhiP-h T~t: From
(r'~-nAI k,t: imRe~,trmq to hI '1'ranEmitted
DIRiX:Glent t^ ot'hI- e-,~vern~mn~a l
a. Genera~ Fund ....... -- __
LI. gnv/ronamntal HeaZth
b. Flood ConlLrol District
548
120
407
400
678
m. Road meetmerit (traffic gudy, if
required)
'. f. Road IMi~'laent -
Comprehensive ~:anBportation plan
s. ~M
i. ~ ~~t
~)
i
Omsprmbm~ vm 1~anEpoztation Plan
641
44
176
641
14
2
3
4.
s.
6
I
9
10
17
.20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE 67L~
RscaJ Yea:
1990-91
(X7)
· ._li, Snvironmental ~$alth
ill, Fire DeLm~._._.r~
iv, Sulldinq and. 8afe~y
· ~...-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'~,,~.rl~ · .y? ~....4 c.: ....
-.. . ..
1483
407
24
400
_.__,rgrxr,.--'~. ,~ .,,s.~ to · maximum-
- "-, -,b 000
e. Road Departaent (mff/ommdy~ Lr
Road Delmrtaent -
Cosprehensivs .....Tr.m.._~po_rt4tion Plan
(18) p,.w'~ 4,.,- ua~
a, General Fund
i, PlaAnlnq Dslsa_..r_..tm~n._._t
ii, znvironmenUl Health
ilL.-Fire Oelm._r_~aent
iv. Buildinc/and Safe~y
b. Flood Control DlstriO_~
c. Road Departsent (general)
641
3707
I 625
I 375
I 678
9
2
3
4
S
8
9
~0
~2
~3
:L4
~S
~8
~9
20
2~
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
3~
32
ORD]~IANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
estimated ~ k _,,: ~.~ s'~-~-r ,-,, _. ' ' --
e. Parks
f, Boad Departmen~ -
Compfth.m~...iv, Tranmlx}rl3~Lon P::LBA
(Lg} ~t~-nnd Un4+ ~
a. General 7Und
i. ~iannLnq Department
li.......~vLx~rsen~al Health
b. Flood Co~._~ol Dls~r~c~
c. Boad Departsent:
d. Road Departmn~, - -'
Comprehens'tve 'L'nnnlmm on Plan
_. _l~,_lm $33 ~ qz'oss am
it.. ..!nvfA'onaenUl Health
ilL. FiFe Delmartaen~
b. Flood Control
c. Roed Del~...rt:men't:
355
297
83
335
245
244
142
250
2O
9254
33
649
800
2105
10
C# ·
2
3-
4
S
10
12
.t3
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
199~91
d. Parks Deparlm_en~
e. aoad Deparlment: -
BBi~.~ ~..TT~FFlt~or~a~ion Plan
355
74:0"
(22) BRBe-t ft~- plan - Roid, SR~-t flP plan
a. Road !)elmrtment: ......
4039
'~' .~
343
27
li. Environmental Heal~:h
b. ~oad Delmrtmen~
c. ~oad Deparmen~ -
Cem~rahensivs ~ranspor~atimm Plan
59
138
106
(25) :ZiI,~ Usedraft. N^4. T^ w't,et~LAiaG
i. Plsnninq Delmrtsent
ii. Znvimmmental Health
iv. $mildir~ and safe~w
b. ~mad DeVartment
c. Read Departman~ -
Comprehensive Transporta~ion Plan
1407
36
140
24
147
113
11
X
2
3
4.
5
6
7
8
9
X0
XX
X2
X3
X4
XS
X7
X8
Xg
20
2X
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3X
32
33
34--
ORDINANCE 671.4
ii. Znvirormental Health
iii. Fire Departzent
b. Road Department
c. Road-Delmrtaent-
Coaprehe~ive Transportation Plan
(37) V~rlanee Tiled klan,
a. GeneralFund
i. Planninq Departaent
ii. !nvironaental Health
iv. SulldirW and. Sare'~-y
Coaprehensive Transportation
Plan
(28) Accesson, IlRCH hea~,,d' f,r,l,,Gii1
tq~14fnrntli wnviP,,~nlten~l n,-l tt,v ~
a. Ganmral ~
i. planninq Departmant
ii. rix~ De~art~n~
ili. load Deportant -
CasF~~lve Transl~mtion
)lan
(29) ~ lltyw M,,~- htlrd. ft-,l_l~bl
~til 4 fOt~liT:T~ t'nviPotllln~al n, sl 41..v
Fiscal Year
1990-91
Fee
571
48
315
79
46
1476
48
315
3Z
118
372
360
3O
553
ORDINANCE 671.4
F~aJ Yea:
1~)4~91
1
2
3
4
5
7
S
10
13
'16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
32
33
ii. Fire !)e~attaeAt
lii, Road DeptFtaent -
Cosprehensive Transporta~Lon
Plea
(30) cosm~-4,m uu~ PtER~
a. GenertlAmd
. i, Planninq DoRatruant
"' ii, 'SnviromenUl Smlth'
360
44
3045
19
ill, Fire ~-.'~- 360
· :- - , ~ :~r- '~neral) I ..... 668
d. Road oepattmAt -
Cos~.rehensive Tnns~rUtion Plea
(31)
a, Gsnsva~Funcl
. L..,_ EnvironRental Health
244
SO0
(32) ~hnirsi Tnfomtion va~er
a, CsenerLZ Paid
i- PlamdJIq I)el~z~:melt
18
Road DeparUent -
Couprehensive TransporUtion
Plan
(33) vax. am lrauilv Day ~arsHoas
a. GeneralFund
i,. PlanaiM I)elmtl~eAt
ii. EnvironRental Health
ilL.,. Fire Depam~nt
b. Flood Control Distri~
436
78
255
400
13
1
2
3
4
S
6
I
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
ORDINANCE 671.4
FLed Year
1990-91
c, Road D!__.Mrlm...ent f_aeneral)
shall equal 1,5 -~b~ ,.' ~ I.~-- ..,~ ....
e, Road Depart:sent: (~a~c 8~udy,
required)
Z, Road Depertxant
Comprehenaive Transportation Plan
(34) Razardous Waste Fa~,!14+y f44,(r~ ~
a. eef~~
~-~F~P~.,:- DePartment
· - pxu $36 pera_.cmI
b. Flood Oor~,Tol Distri~
e, Road lMi~t'eamnt -
Cou~rehene~veTraneportatlon Plan
plus $3 I~r qroes am
(35) r4nnele and Oattaries Jlhieh*"21
l, Lm~eaeed unda~ fac4-i^n 11.4q
i. planninq Department
lll.'load Department -
CoepreheneiveTransporl:atlon
Plan
678
641
35
10683
36
lOOO
450
764
641
855
3
331
30
26
14
ORDINANCE 671,4
FL~al Ye~
199(~91
Fee
1
2
3
4
6
ii, EnvironRental Health
7
ill, SherifZ*s
8
9
10
eoaprehensivo Transportation
Plan
Z2
13
14
IS
16 ii, Znviro..mn..tal Health
X7 ili, aheriff'S......DO. pa__r~t I
').-) IS b, Road Depertmm.~_ . .... I
19
20
o, Road DepartRent -
Cosprebensive Tren..s. por~ution Plon
2Z
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Comprehensive Transportation
29
30
31
32
33
34
lOS
3:L
27
8
424
3Z
27
68
34
73
6
789
1S
2
3
·
5
6
7
8
9
XO
XX
X2
13
14
15
X7
Z8
X9
20
21
22
23
ORDINANCE 671.4
li. Road Deparment -
Comprehensive TransporUtion
Plan
(40) B~D, la~y ~ehtd,,l e
been hal,4 Before an~ ~1 n^t: t',,tSVt' IProR
the ~slifo~n4~ lt~v4tmDiln4'-I
a. General ~md
li. Road DeparUent -
Cosprehenstve ~ransSmrU~ion
Plan
a. General ~ "
Cospreh~rmive 'l'ranapomt. J. on
F~caJ Year
199~91
63
850
68
407
33
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
'10
X3
~4
15
16
17
18
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2g
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
42
42
ORDINANCE 671.4
Li. Road Department -
Comprehensive Tranmpomtion
PXan
B. Whenever an application rot a change or
gone, peruit, or variance is terminated
for any reamon, the PXanninV Deparlaent
may, Xn accordance vith the itmt~tnd
Polic./Staf'.aent adoi~ed by the Board
of Supervbore, re~md fees paid, upon
lie written request of the applLoum:. '
Zf any portion of the application foes
have been paid by the Planning
Department. ~o another Juriedic~ion,
agency, or deparUent for the
perro~ of senices reigned ~o the
application,- th, ~lanntng cmpartaent
viII not reined any such portion of
Ctmir foes until the other
Juried/c~Lon, egency, or~*dWiMix-l~erit-
eu~bor/gem the pIanntng tMpar~aent U
do go. Xn the absence of much
eu~horXsation, it viII be the
applicant's responsibility to ~ontact'
the o~her Jurimiic~ion, agency, or
d~t for a refund of the foes
paid ~o it, in accordance vith the
Refund Policy SUnmont.
c. The plannLng Departmant mIX rough a
processing foe of $75 from the 'total
aount to be refunded.
Fiscal Year
1990-91
2
75
The fees for Ordixmma No. 43X, .rmguXatiJW
and controlling the l~Cion ~ o~raCion or
h~ ~, mIX ~ u rollre:
New PmrRitAPnliem~4^n PH
a. GonereX Fund
i. Planning Department
1639
17
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
Fee
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
XO
11
12
13
14
X6
X7
X8
19
20
2X
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
(2)
(3)
ii. Road Depar~en~ -
Comprehensive Transportation
Plan ·
Road EMpertmen~: -
Cbsprehensive ?ransperta~ion
Pl8~
$l per ZOO hogs vith · sinisua
of $lO regardless or the
staid:mr of hoql allramble
a. Gmmx*al~
i. l, lanning Deperemem:
aS Imz~eit or the required
insl~ion fee
Cosprehensive Transportation '
Plan
S perodrt'of the required
inslM~cion fee
131
16
127
1
10
2t
26
2
[
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
1
2
3
4.
S
(s)
6
7
9
10
CcmprebeneLve Tx-anspam~aa
11
12
13
14
IS
17
18
X9
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
b fees rot ordl~saoe ao. 458, relating to
the reg~ation or flood hss&rd ~zes~ ~nd
ispleseating ~ NatJoel rl~ ~
t~,u, ~ll M u tollmz
(x)
~+4^n vnvslv4rV LiD4 Which v.4em
Dmmerribmd in ~m-d. 4sn 't ^f rsrd4ni/lgI
a. GmnmraX Fund
i. Bui.l_d_inq and Safety
b. Flood .Control Distri~
Plus $180 rot e~ch b~Llding mitt
shovn_oa the awlioBtion
(3)
b. 11.o9d. Control Oistri~
32
33
for each building site shorn on the
sppll~.ti.._on '
34
35
36
37
(3)
~rml lrmtiOM for an Xs'l, peml Or VsP4tneo
a. Clerk of ~ Board o~ Supervisors
169
X4
410
180
119
545
180
6O
1
2
3
4
6
8
l0
11
12
16
17
18
~' 20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
ORDINANCE 671.4
SECTION 5~ ORDINANCE N0~'460 FEES-
The fees for Ordinance No. 460, relating to
the division of land shall be as lollors:
A. The folloving fee shall be paid to the
Road Coaslsslonsr aid deposited into
the general t~md:
X. aPP~Nh. ~rUrl4~ NO.
L. Survey
B. The toXlovi~J tees slmll be paid to the
Planning D/rector end deposited Lnto
the general fund, the fund for the
Flood Control District or sgaioy that
Eramidas the flood hazard rei~rt, the
appropriate road or gas tax i~nds, and
the Parks Departseat i~mds
;lus $21 per ~ross a~re
ii. Znvironsental !kalth
ili. Fire Departsent
( 2 ) Flood ~mt~ol Distri~
· . tm-'-~_~r~ss am
(4) Bond DepartBent (~A'af~iO study,
(s) Road ~eperUent -
Cmprshensive ~'z'snspamtion Plan
Fiscal Year
1990-91
Fee
25
4764
65
21
362
544
600
8
277
641
381
ORDINANCE 67L4
F/s~l Year
199~91
Fee
1
2
3
4
6
1Q
12
D
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
(4) ~oad
.... (r, rarrlc study,
.I
( s ) Road DeperUent -
_. .C..osprehensJ. ve 'rransportatlon Plan
..9.1ua $5 ~r unit
DIns $2 per qross am
c. Pavts~d Statutory Condosinlns
Sutdlvlalon I~p Filing (Within ~eo
Yetre of Original kFproval)
(1) Gesez~l 9land
. ._1. Plknnlng Depaztaent
Dlu $70 D~r additional trait
plus $22 pot additional gross
tl... Bnvlzonaental Bealth
111. FIre DeFaztaent
pr each additional unit
21
5
2
4764
65
21
783
544
600
8
300
641
381
5
2
5131
70
22
203
159
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
lee
1
( 2 ) Road _Depa_rtaen.t_ ..
( 3 ) Road DepartRent:
(traffio s~udy,
300
642.
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
14
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
( 4 ) Road Departmint -
_ ._C_O_aprehermive Transpo_rta.t_lon. Plan
.... ~..lUs $6 .~er additional unl~
.._ plU ..~2 per__a. dd~tional qroes acre
plus $22 per e~cb eddit~on~ ·
ii. Znviromn~al Health
ili, Fire Departmat
(2) .Rmd Department ...................... :
(3) ~rdrequb~Tm) t,(trafrio otudy,
(4) ned Departant -
Comprehensive TrusporUtion Plan
· . Ll~'-r additional unit
plus $1 per additional qross acre
0
(2.) enere2. Fund
1. Plm'mtr~.....De~~. ..........
plus $20 per lo~
plus $2o per gross a~re
410
6
2
5131
70
203 '..
178
300
641
410
6
2980
20
20
2
3
·
'5
6
7
8
9
ZO
Z2
Z3
Z5
Z6
Z9
20
2Z
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDINANCE 671.4
Znviromntal Health
Fire DepartRent:
( 3 ) Fl~.t...COntrol ....... J
Pl.s $5 Per Lot ................... J
(ZaT~rovesent plan ~L...._~_~_. [.
I
( 4 ) load Depaztant
If required)
( 5 ) Parks DeSmrtment
(6) load Deimztsent -
Ccmprehensive ?rsnspor~ation Plan
plus $2 per lot J
~~ Mr aross acre J
(4) Road DepartBent (l:ratf.'Lc study,
if required)
( 5 ) PLrJm DepeFlaent
"1'
Fiscal Ye~
1990-91
362
547
600
641
355
238
2
2980
20
20
783
547
600
5
761
641
355
l
2
3
·
S
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Z9
'20
21
32
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE 57L4
( 6 ) Road Depar~Ren~ -
Couprehens ive Transportation Plan
plus $2 per lot
plus $2 per qross acre
~lD~st4veRssiden~ial
lfaive~ of IP4nll N~
(1) General Fund
l. Plenninq
$86 per lot ........... [ ........
ii. Zn~ironsen~l Health
I
I
I
(2) Ylood ~mtrol Distri~
· . ~l*;-r lot
(Zsproveuent Plan Check)
( 4 ) Road
study,
hrks
RDad 'Deimrtaeat - :
Cos~rehensive Translmrtatian Plan
Flus $7 per lot
d, ~saestivs Issidsntial Parcel Man
Without Waivs~ ^f tiql],,J[IR -
(3.) GeMnZ rmvS
i. I,/,unlx~ Delarcaem:
· . ~.m-~r lot
iii. yizm
Fiscal Year
199~91
Fee
238
2
2
1332
86
295
547
260
300
5
52
318
641
355
107
7
1213
9O
326
547
24 (',
1
3
4
5
?
9
't0
X3
17
20
2m
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3m
ORDINANCE 671.4
.rl. ood_ Control D__iS_~.!Gt:
p..l. us_$S ~er !.0._~ ................
Road .. Oepertment ..............
-(4) ~tdz. equ_~U~m~t:':'(~-'~t'fie study,
rid
(S) Ptrkg'Del~rtment .............................
(6) Road Oeptrtnent -
~ ~ ~ -~rtation Plan
~_luS~_$7 I~_r lot '
plus $84 pet eeQ additional
lot
ii. Environmental Health J
ill. Fire Department .... J"
(3) ]toad IMptrtment "I"
(3) L~R~dre~b~~)t (trefflo mmdy,
~ 4 )' Peru Departrant =
(s) Road Department -
Comprehenmive Transpomtion Plan
RluS,. $~_.psr _.such.. additional lot J
ltmeimed IMpeel Maw Pi14n~
and Industrial It~-,.~el MaDe After
Years nf ~tn-~
(1) ~1 ~
F~cal Yea:
1990-91
300
S
......... 318
97
7
351
84
101
1~9
248
641
178
28
351
1
2
3
4
S
8
9
10
Z1
13
14
15
16
Z7
Z8
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
31
ORDINANCE 671.4
plus $44 per each addl~ional
. i.i-_ ....._Znv_Irorms_nt_a.1 Health ['
· ..i_i..i__,._ P_ira Dela._z~_.s_n.t:__' . .......... ]"
( 2 ).. Road Deparlmsnl: ._ ' ......... ]' .
(3) Road Delmmsn~ (tnZZio 8tndy,
_..i~ .required.) ....
( 4 ) l~rks Delmrlmsn~ ...... ['
( 5 ) Road. Delmr~sent -
Cosprehensive Transportation )lea
plus $4 per each. additio..nsl_ 1..or .... I ...
Revised Residential pst~*tt.J~ f/~i~er
~ sf oPte4nlJ~ARBv~vsll
i, Planning Departseat ..
plus $100 per tu~h edditioml
lo~
ii, lnvironuenUl Health I
ili, Fire Delmrtmn~ I'
~~ ufud Deua~cnent: I '
(3) Lfi~d~~i: (tnUi. o st'ud7~
(4) im:ks DeFarimen~ .......
(S) ~ I)el~ztmen~ -
Cm~rehensive'Z'ransl~r~.ation PZsn
pzus $8 per ..e..s.ch.__kddi...t!o.nsl_ lot_ _1 .............
26
Fiscal Year
1990-91 (
101
170
318
6.41
178
28
4
414 /
100
113
318
641
1'78
33
2857
1
2
"3
4
S
7
I
9
ZO
12
Z3
15
Z6
'1'7
18
't9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28'
ORDINANCE 671.4
(3) Road
(4) Road Department (traffic study,
if requi_red) .....
Fizal Y~
199(~91
!2
362
S44
600
S
896
641
355
229
2
4990
90
21
362
S44
24
600
S
896
641
) 27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10'
12
13
:1.5
:1.8
20.
21
32
23
24
25
36
27
28
29
30
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
Fee
( 5 ) Road Depar~mant -
C0mp.r.._~..._en,.tve ~ranspor~ation Plan
. plus .5'7 per lot
.plus $2 per qros8 acre
plus $20 per qrosa acre
ii. Invironaental Health
ill. rite
plus$Sper lot
(4) iP~~t (trafflQ study, red
(5) iqudm Depart:mint
(6) lad Delmrt~ut -
CaWrebensive ?ruslmmtion Plan
per lot
plm $3 ~er m am
(:L) aeertt Vund
i. P:Leaning umparmmut
plus $62 per each additional
399
7
2
2857
82
20
S44
600
5
896
641
355
229
7
2
279~.__ ....
62
3
3.
S
I
9
XO
X2
't3
'~4
X5
X7
X8
X9
20
2~
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
plus $19 per ts~h sddition~l
qzoss acre_ ....
Znvirorment&l Health
( 2 ) ..Rind.._oegettuent: ......
(3) __~_.~t (trufflo study,
(4) u,,-d IMpetUent: -
e. RlY,,LIf f.,,W, d4v4m~on Nae (W44-1s4n ~
Yetan ^f r~4~74n,t'1 a~t, eV=,11
(1) (kutzIZ IPlznd
i. Pl~nnin~ Delmrtmmt ....................
plus $62 per eaoh additional
lot
plus $19 per each midit~Lonl~
..eraas acre
ii. Znvirormental HMlth
( 2 ) Roed Depez'e:aen't ' _
(3) iZS~K!~t (traffic etudy,
19
--
I.... 20.3._
I 159
641
234
!
2
2798
62
19
203
178
318
641
(4) Road
Ccaprehenaive
plus $S.pe~._e~.._r~. sdditiorml lot
plus $3 per m~ch additiorml gross
224
S
-)
29
],
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ZI
12
:],3
14
:],S
:1,6
19
20
21
22
23
34
25
26
27
28
29
ORDINANCE 671.4
ii. Znvironsen~ul !iealt, h
i..xJ. ~J~ ue~rtmem:
( 2 ) Flood' c~..ntrol Distric~
plus. $57_ l~_r._ acT_e ...........
( 3 ) Road_ Oe_pe~~. ..................
(4) Road 9epa~'ement (raffia study,
i
i~zmqu red) ...............
(s) hrks Depart:sent
(6) Road Oepa~caeng -
Cosprehensive 2Tensportation p~an
plus $7 per .uni~
plus $2. F4~. gross am
b. Vestina Tenutive Pt"~tI,H2
(l) 2emral Fund
i. Plsnnin~ DepartBent
· . LLm-'-z lc:4:
plm_..$21 _,;er_qzoss am
ii, ln~izo~_tm.l._ .Bealt:h .....
ill. FJ.z'e..De;m~t. I
( 2 ) rleed Con~...1 .. Di_stric~
I
I
Fiscal Year
1990-91 (
4983
9O
Plus $57 per lot
( 3 ) aoa. d_ tmparten~
21
783
544
600
63
974
641
355 ~"
399
7
2
4846
88
21
783
544
600
57
974
],
2
3
4
S
6
8
9
10
13
].S
)
]..8
19
20
2],
22
23
24
25
ORDINANCE 671.4
Year
199~91
(4) :~l~a~dr~~[a~~)t (traffic study,
. ( S ) Parks D~lmrU~nt
(6) Road oeptruent -
Cos~rehensive Transitoration Plan
olus $7 Rer lot
o. 3~11~t~'' ?tlltativs Sinale-family
(1) Gene~'al Fund
RluS $84 ~er lot,
Rlus $20 Mr qross aore
ii, ZnviroraenUl H~alth
ill., Fire Hartant
(3)/'Z _ood Control Distriot
(4) Road DeparUent
if..required)
(traffio study,
(S) ;~..._ka.. DeDarc:se~t
(6) Road D~|mrl:s~nt -
Colurehensive TransportatiOn plan
641
355
388
7
2
4698
84
783
544
600
57
974
641
355
.I
376
..p.l_us $7 per lot
pluS $3 per gross acre
7
2
31
1
2
3
4
S
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
34
25
26
37
38
29
30
31
32
33-
34
35.
36
ORDINANCE 671.4
C. The following fees shell be peld to the
Planning DepartRent end deposltod in the
g~neral ~und or appropriate Road
DepartBent or ~lood Control Dlstrt~ Fund:
AlmaliB r.e-~d~vsalon~
11. Ylre Departsent (If fire
conditions appealed)
(a)
(3)
(4)
b. Roed Deparement (ZR road conditions
appealed).
o. RosdDepartaent -
eomprehenslveTransporUtion Plan
Cmaprehensive Trznsporratlon
~lsn
il. invirOrd~l wealth
iii. 9ire D~pertsent
~e
Couprehenalve Trenspomtlon
Fiscal Year
19~91
Fee
331
215
126
26
93
356
23
104
28
100
32 ~
1
2
3
4
5
7
I
9
XO
XX
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
30
21
22
23
24
25-
26
27
28
29
3O
31
32
33
(s)
(6)
('7)
(8)
ORDDiANCE 671.4
qpT~ 'I'PS'I S*
~e
Oaapz~e~alve S~AapomtAo~
91a~
!mr~4on ,~f 94at (m,.,k,q4v4mion~
a. e, eneeraX ~
ii. aoad Deparment -
Omap~ive ?:w~apomtlea
9la~
/diDd_DAXAi4on nni4- NaV r414,~
a. generaX Fund
i. Planninq Departant
it..._YJZe Demarment
ilL. we~d Departsent -
.ii, laviron~n~l Xtslth
b. flood ...Control DIstrict
c. Road De _p~rtent
d. Road ;emarmet -
Comprmhmnsive Transportation Plan
Rsca~ Year
1990-91
xo4
8
268
21
274
22
187
104
15
430
2O
3O
138
34
,)
33
1
2
3
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
'
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2'7
25
3O
ORDINANCE 67L4
Fjsud Yea:
1~)(~91
Fee
(9) M{nor r~*n~
a. General Fund
L. PXmnnLr~ Department
1t. Firm
b. Road Delmrtsent
c. Boad Dep~rtaent (tx'affic study,
d. Boad Department -
Comprehensive Txlnsporl:atlon Plan
a. Gan~al Ftmd
L, PlannfiW Del art:... n...t
470
104
124
641
38
459
a. :~/L~E L~~~~)t: (trafila study,
d. ltoedDep&rtment--
CcmDz'ebenaLve ~qu~l~mtion Plan
(11) MePatP of Cont.tm,o,,i Pmrcmll I
104
134
641
37
494
a. GmnsralFund
i. plmnnXnq Department
500
4O
392
104
..................
6,sv
34
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
:1.3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
33
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
ORDINANCE 671.4
c. Road Department
Cospre~...ens_.l,.ye 7rans~X~..rr, at:l, on_P].an
(13) Sue,'.ia't earvice Latter
a. Genera]. FusM
Cosprehensive ~nsporUtion
i~d , n~l-Familv Reaidential ~rs~ts
(1) General Fund
Flus $10 per acre
~].tll rl~ordl ~ol t f
ill, Road bpartaent~ -
Coapnhensive Trusportation
plus $1 per lot chanqe
plus $1 per q~oss am
(x) ~eneruX Fund-
i, i~lanni.M Departsent
:K~Ius $16 per lo4:
plus $9 per gross acre
plus recordation fee
ill, Road Department -
CosprehensiveTrenspert~tion
Plan
plus $1 per lot
I
'1
Fm~d Year
1990-91
..32
1.83
15
1709
18
~0
didiV
137
1
1
1592
16
9
QdiQ,/
127
1
35
1
2
3
4
S
6
8
9
X0
12
13
14
15
16
17
II
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fisc~ Yeas ·
x99o-gx(
Fee
plus .$1 per~ross acre I 1
D. The Zollovi~/fees shall be ;mid to the
Road Cmissioner and de;melted into the
general fund, the gas m fm~d and the
a~r~prie~e fl~mi control ftmd or dis~i~
Z~ for ~e distri~ ~Mu~lon ~e Z~I
(3)
(4)
e. General IPunci ' -
' ' "'~lum'~ecorda~ion fee
- -lu re~rda i n Zoo
m-M4vtmi~MmV IPtli~sa
i. Plannin~ Department
plus $l , par qt~s8 'am .................. J
(
147
101
1
(5) linal Parcel Maw 141.4h
a. ~2hedule JR"
-(X) ~eneral Fund
i. .Plarm!r~J..Depar'caen~
101
')
r
ORDINANCE 67L4
wIPe ('hm, wl{%h mimes
plus $X ~er lot.-
ili, Sold De,~~v~ - natim
.. plum 0 per lot
~o 8t~mdulm mXm
olus Sl ram: marcre1
ili, ~ DeSmrtment -
~ive 1~sportatio. n
37
.... ~lus 0 Mr Nr~el
Fiscal Year
199~91
1
1470
8
0
X36o
4
0
54
1
2295
4
X
2
3.
4
S
9
XO
XX
X2
X3
X4
XS
X7
X9
20
2X
22
23
24
25
26
2~
28
29
30
3X
ORDINANCE 671.4
(6)
....... pl~s $1 Def lo~
F/seal Year
199(~91
10
lO1
1205.
8
2
3
4
S'
6
8
9
ZO
Z2
Z3
X4
X6
:7
ZI
X9
20
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
3:].
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
4Z
(9)
ORDINANCE 671.4
plan r~tek'lne. ~ t:^ 4,.!,if
Deuattment for both road and ~l,-,--:=-am.
At +l~L,~ of ftl 4n~ ^f
pl anl f~P ~tek4 n-
Road Departs $2.S00
I ~e~osnt of ~he es~lsa~sd
end ut~ZL~y ~ons~_~/on
(3) rZood _-:-: --oZ
l__pe~O~m__t of romdandlsd~lic
(2) rlood ContTol DistriCt
Z SN~oeat o~bondedvalue o~
saLntaLned Flood ConZ:ol
Fac~l~tLes
39
Fiscal Yea:
1990-91
lee
52
5S
2 ~
3 ~
X~
1
2
3
'4
5
7
8
9
3.0
11
12
13
14
lS
· 16
) 17
1,9
20
21
22
23
ORDINANCE 671.4
Survey Hon,,ilnt: F 1 · 1,4 Tner~ec.t: 4 on
Schedule A-C and B-
GeneraX fund
S1.ZZVey
us $2 ~4rq~oee acre
1. Survey
pXu~ $. so
200
c. S~edule' kP-H
(X) GonereX Fund
i, Survey
pXum $3(
Rarcel
(x)
ie
pXue $,S0 per groee a~re over
200 ($3,SOOKaxLaua)
(x) GoneFaX Fund
1. Survey
1O Ipmt or orLg~ fee
Fisca/Yea:
1990-91
Fee
635
2
865
,S0
340
20
740
SO
50 t
4O ~.
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
ZO
~2
Z3
't6
Z7
~8
Z9
20_
22
25
26
27
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
ORDINANCE 671.4
FXLIXG rzzs FOR EXPIRED RBCORDABLB
· UBDZ'VZS'rON liSP8
'i. Xe · tentative trac~c map is mabslt~od to
recordable 8ubd~vimion map on Use sam
propar~ and Use nev Umta~lve tnct mp
is no ~rerent than
the Zinu
of Use
M~~n 4,WI l~vtn,, Fees Shall be
F^I
(x) emuz'eZ Z, und
a, Planninq Depax-~sen~
;lus $15 )e~ lo~
;lus $15 ~e~ elx~ss acre
( 2 ) Flood Control D/strict
;lus $S per lot
(3) Road
(4) Road Department:.-
~ -} .~ ~ ~ -;,,rearion PIn
plus .$1 per lot:
;lus $1 m qross am
Lieu of the Filing Fees Provided for
Baltt-faully Residential tracts ~n
and b or Paragraph
this aecl:lon, the
Foilwing Foes shall be Psitit
(l) General Fund
·. Planning.
F~c~ Ye~
1990-91
1681
15
15
600
5
150
134
1
1
1829
41
2.
2
'3
4
S
6
7
8
9
lO
Z2
Z3
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
ORDINANCE 671.4
plus $16 per qross acre
(2) Flood Con~:rol Dil~riC~
.... p.1..uo_....$S.. pe:.. gFoss acre
( 3 ) Ro~d Delmrtsen~
(4) Road OeperUong -
ConpFehenaive TFenoportetion Plan
plus $1 per 9ross scr.e ....
plus $1 per lot
plus $s per lot
ill, Road Departmat -
Couprehensive ?rensporUt.ion.
plus 0 per lo~
(2) r. tjlLt_Jj~4~y '~^ndominium Man
aoGemzul/Und
plus $1 I~r lee
~erVJmssacreever 10
plus $3s per groea e~re
($1,2S0 mix) ............
Irerod ~t -
Comprehensive Trmmpo~tion
Pl&n
42
Fiscal Year
1990-91
16
600
8
1S0
146
101
1
603
8
101
1
600
25
8
2
3
4
"'S
6
8
9
ZZ
13
14
17
Z8
20
22
23
24
25
36
27
28
29
30
3Z
32
33
34
35'
36
ORDINANCE
~lus 0 per lot
For t~h~e purpoeel o~ this 8zbleG'r. ion,
expired r~~le s~lvision mp
~ ~ epp~ ~Utive m~ mp for
~si~, ~e r~l up ~e
for si~~, ~ ~e f~ mp
subdivision map shall be Bade by tht
Road Coamis~ioner.
Nothing mined in~hia subso~tion
shall bo~onstruedtoprevaut or -.
proaibitthe lsposition of additional or
diffarenta~ditions on the nee .....
tentative map. b riling foes
~mtainod in the subsection shall be
applicable if any changes or
altArnatives are required to be made to
the tentative mp or final sap or to
2o tsprovem~ plans as a ~ resml~
of the isposition by the of
additional or different ~lit~onsJ
or~~f l saps or to the iaproveaent
plans ~hieh are uo~ l~e dlzm~ result of
the iqNMitAOn Of additional or
.diZferent conditions by the Count, the
land divider shall be required to pay
all the filing foes specified in
Subsetions & through D of thia Section.
F~scal Year
1990-91
43
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
Z0
Z2
14
15
Z6
Z7
18
19
20
'} 2Z
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
32
33
34
35
39
40
4Z
42
43
44
F. Air r~,altty v-lfmant IPat
Xn addition ~o ~e Zees se~ ~o~ in
'S~se~lons k, B, ~d ! o~ ~is S~lon,
~e a~ll~ Zor any r. id~tial~
t~Utive s~ivision Mp or resid~tial
1ot ~ ~e appll~ for ny sUtuto~
~~iu ~ivision mp ~all ~y ·
fee of SIX ~r ~lt for ~e ~m of
p~ri~ ~ ~Xaen~i~ ~ air
~all~ elu~ of ~e qaral ply,
(I) Air rmili~v v,l~
$II Star. lot or unit
a. Gantral Pund
i. Plannlnq D~par~snt
G. Raf~,nd ^~ letis ^f Ot, d4naneL Nh. 460
1. Ifhenever u appZiution for a Ia,ml division or related application is
tera~nated for any reason, the planning
Departrant nay, in aacordanee vieb the
Refund Poliay S~ateaent adopad by
applicant. If any portion of the
application fen has been paid by the
ampiztauttodoso. In thembsenceof
smi~sation, it viII ha the
appllaant'8 responsibility to eorataet
the othezJ:~ic~ion, aqenoy or
departmud: for a refund of the fees paid
to it, in aooordance with the Refund
PollcT Itateaen~.
The Planning DepartRent shall reUin a
promsing fee of $75 frOU the toUl
11
75
44 (~.,
X
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
X0
12
X3
14
15
16
17
18
X9
2O
22
24
25
26
27
29
3X
32
33
34
35
ORDINANCE 671.4
SECTION 6~ ORDDIANCB S46:
the County Fire Chief and deposited into the
general Zund, and shall be as foilross
(1) Plan Ch~ks-Su41StnRI
(6) "_lmd:~,',ks ~ p~-~ ,"~m~d
e.~anerulFund
i. Fire beS~rtaent
Fiscal Year
1990-91
558
138
84
560
558 ..
354
45
-)
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
Z2
13
14
15
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fire safety rnsM~tonl (t.tcglf4 carel
(1) Ftr,~ rnBctton (NOv t.t~tntt~
me6 or 11lI
(1) General Alnd
a. Fire
(1) General Fund
a.. F._ire Delmmen~
(4) F"~tlP'Vk'im
a. General~ i. Fire
C. lA73_liZj TnlD~'tiO.' (1)
a. rl~*hwsllgh '.499
(1) General Fund
a.r..Lre DeMrment
b. · · aM +hs~B~h 4. egg ~tq. IPI-.
(:t) aeaerax rums _
a. F~._~~ ...............
(3.) ames3. Z, md
·. _..r!~_.._oepartaent:
(a) IalallDe4eg
a. Genena rmd
i._;._..i~_ Depaz4:ent
(3) ~al&mLLt.
Fiscal Year
1990-91
81
162
81
40
16
58
82
124...
124
82
46 ~-
2
3
4
--S
ORDINANCE 671.4
b, a. OOO m,., IP~. hr Bore
(1) oneral fund
._. a. r_ire. Department
(4) Restaurants
a. J~h~M~h 4.999 ~-.1~:.
(1) General fund
a. fire Devartaent
F~d Ye~
199~91
124
82
8
9
10
(1) gena~l And --
a, fire .Deoarmen~
124
12
:L3
14
11
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
olus $3 ~4fun~
plus $32 per addi~LonaZ
(3) 1Mrsr S VEt in FXovTsEt
a. rdmr~hnd
i. ~irm....._Oe~a..___rtJa~ Per hydrant
82
92
121
2.08
32
121
47
2
3
4
S
6
7
9
lO
ll
12
X4
15
~ X7
X9
2O
22
23
24
25
27
28
2g
30
3X
32
33
.- 34.
35
36 ..
37
ORDINANCE 671.4
S~ON 7. ORDINANCE S47 FEES,
The fees for Ozdinance 14o. 547 ralatinq to
the lsplesenUtion of the Alquist-Priolo
Special S~dies Zones Ac~, shsll be is
foilors:
(3.) ttlin~ of - eSle~le~l~- Re,~or4' for ADrPewal
i. Plsnninq Depaz~ment
for a Irareal lO acres Ln size
or less plus $X6 for each
adaitionaZ acre
to a maximm fee ~f $637
Coapz'ebensive ~r~nspomtion
Plsn
for a paz~l 10 sofas in sLss
or leu plus $Z for each
additional am
to a naziram fee o~ $~0 "-
Caprohanaiva s~u~pamtioa
plus an additional $Z6 upon
submission to the State
· eologist of rec~aaendation or
approval of v~vier by ~
Geologist.
F~cal Year
1990-91
Fee
453.
627
36
2
SO
58
324
5
26
48 ~.
2
4
S
7
$
10
12
20
22
23
24
26
27
29
30
31
32
ORDINANCE 67L4
The feee for Ordinance No. SSS, relatJ~g ~o
the ~upleuenUtion of ~e ~a~ ~ ~
~lmti~ ~ of XgtS, ~ll ~ u foilrot
i. Plsnninq DeR~z'~sm~
if. Znvirmmentsl Seslt~
b. Flood Control Distria~
d. Road De~arUm~ (raffia study, if
B.~-~ ~ ~ -~,mtioa -SlsA _.
(3)
Raelm4,4^n plans Nutmitt. aS f^t,, Vaua~M
~BIZRLLgBI e,..,md.,e4.ed Ai~er ..Tsnuaw "t .
eoGeosrel/Und
c. need eepu'taent (traffic study., if
(3)
FIscal Year
1990-91
3723
20
24
450
819
641
355
298
1727
410
641
307
62
49
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fiscal Year
1990-91
1
2
7
9
lO
12
13
14
15
16
'~' 18
-19
20
21
22
23
24
'. 25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
(4)
(s)
(~)
c. Ro~d Department -
__ Comprehensive Transportation Plan
~Ri~_ 4 $1 TnlRI~ 4 ^n Perei~
a. General fund
i. B~ildinq and Safety
a. G~neral Fund
Ii. ~d H~~~ -
~~e~lve ~~tion
._ i · PX~~
fees for O~ No. 559, relating to
teaoval of trees, shall be as foliowax
(1)
~L~li~tion for a Permit
or ere Native
a,.aeneralrund
i. Pl~ ~~'
' ii. ~ ~~t
~ive ~~ie
25
113
199
16
785
63
214
17
,o L
X
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
XO
XX
X2
:L3
X4
X5
X6
X8
X9
2O
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
ORDINANCE 671.4
szcnoN ORDm q. CS.' ·'
The tees for Ordinance leo. 578, providing for
the es~ablishnent og historic preservation
districts shall be as ~ollovsz
a. General Fund
i. 9lanninq De;mrtant
(2)
a. GeneralFund
i, Planninq Department
ii, Road Department -
Couprehensive TransporUtioa
Plan
"1
The fees for Ordinsn~s No, 6S0, regulating
the disclarge of sewage in the ~rporut6d
territory of t~e ~o~nty of Riverside end
providing penalties for violations 8baXl be
as Zollo~sz
For tueh ParesT !e^~ .tn +hk.~iBl_Bd]~
Division. Fax, saw, +hmn 10.000 a,,. 1~. tn
2JiP- ~ 1, an Xdmne4'f(md ~,e-4~Area
~ ~ e4~t ~v-l,,itton tl_Blllij~lil
(Submurfaem DisusereX -eVStmm~
as e4neral Fund
i, Environmental Health per parcel
F~aJ Yea~
1990-91
189
Ill
X5
106
8
89
51
X
2
3
4
S
6
7
9
XO
X3.
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X?
X8
X9
20
2X
~3
~4
25
26
27
2g
30
3X
32
33
34
35
36
37
ORDNANCE 671.4
(a)
(3)
lt'nv- Mt, l~.4d~ll ps~-r, slI Within
r~n~ ntvtlion (~,,hsurfaes D~s~saX
I. ~ach Of ~~t
I. ~eral ~
(a) ~L~en~al Beal~ ~r
b. For ~ ~X v~ ~e ~ X~
d~v~s~on at~ ~e ~LD~ i~ (4)
~ls v~n ~ X~ d~v~BLon
I. ~~l ~
(a) ~vL~en~al Beal~ pr
8ub-mlrfaes'gmmaa D,suossl Plan
(4) ~tsrns~ive and h~sriaen~-I
DinVeal Svstess rrmludiM nn-si~t
~rmlmtion'and Plan
i, ~~1
(5) ~ ~1-F4~ 4n ~n4,,~4~n Wi~k '
~m~ ~om DiStal
a.~M
(6)
Fiscal Year
1990-91
Fee
89
37
37
346
173
136
1
2
3
4
5
6
'7
I
3.0
11
12
13
~4
~S
X7
II
X9
20
32
33
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40.
ORDINANCE 671.4
The teem for 0mUAam~ IIo. 653, ewe, RblLlhing
tees for ansination of Rooord~ of Suremy and
corner bcmrda by ~he County surveyor snail
bs as tollre:
(2)
i. Survey
........... plus rm~ordinq ice
i. SurV._ey
53
F~al Year
199~91
27
67
73
36
600
7
,)
1
2
3
4
S
8
9
10
],:L
12
13
14
],5
Z8
,, 19
20
21
23
33
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
42
ORDINANCE 671.4
SBCFION D.. Bales ~r Rhwdde Coun~
Implementing the
California Environmental Quilt7' Act' (CEQA)
The fee8 and EZM. depoe:LU for environmenl~al
rev/ev p,u-suanl: t,o t. he "lu.T. e8 for RLvereLde
County bid. ement: the C~l:LrornLa
~xvironaeneal Qual~t~ k~ (CIQA), .aim
rollovi~V al~lications shall be paid to
1:he PlannJaV 2epax'l:aen~ as rollins
(x)
a. eemrall'und
L. l,.annLM De.,erUen~.
IAue $S per acre So a aaxima
$2179
Coup~ehensive Transpor~lon
Plan
54
FLsca.l Year
1990-91 (
.(
594
S
48
X
2
3
4
S
7
9
XO
13
14
lS
16
20
22
33
24
25
26
27
21
29
30
33.
32
ORDINANCE 671.4
plus 0 per acre
(2)
]lkw91 .I "LG,LIXI f^F r~l Wt n-1 lettermr.
~9J:]JJrvit:{nn ~tvstem IMrmit:s (Courmez'~,tal
a, General. Fro'K1
i, ._.P. larm.t. Aq' !)epert::aeAt .....
plus $5 per Vross acre
Fiscal Year
199~91
to · maximm or..$1gg7 ......
plul $278 per gross BegsWit
~~jm_~lied for
LL, hd lMpar'lment -
QmpreheM ve TraMpOLlUtiOn
(3)
plus per qross acre
plus $33 r gross megava.~t,
(lOf) ·WIFe~ for
I. Plannin~ Departsent
(4)
"'1
420
S
1997
278
34
22
207
Road Depertaent - -
Comprehensive Transporr4tion
&l i rw,htr S,,,)l 4 eat form
a. Genexll/md
i. . Plannine 'Deparusnt
plu~ $5 per qros8 ·cre to · ["
uaximmof $2061
17
568
S
206Z
load Department -
Cosprehensive Transportation
Plan
plus $0 per gross acre
45
S5
.t
2
.-3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ZS
16
"'- 17
· -; 18
/
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ORDINANCE 671.4
Jibenever ~vo or Bore applic4tionl are filed
concuFFen1:ly by the sm applictn1: for the
sane propez'cy, only one fee for the
required,
c. The deposits requlFed for the preporal:ion
of the daft: ZZlt 8ball be paid 1:o the
PlannincJ EMpar'caen1: as follows:
r~raf4' eTR
e, ~4neFsl Fund
it.. lnvi.rormenUl Health
iv, load IMperi:aent -
(2)
a. General Fund
I. PZann~W
Fiscal Year
199~91
Fee
6202
154
422
496
1021
154
422
82
X
2
3
4
S
6
7
9...
XO
X3
X3
14
1S
16
X9
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3:].
32
33
34
35
ORDINANCE 67L4
o. The fees for
tollovJ. ng environRental
~oXXM~
(1,) 11'a,,14, Watard Rsnoz. t
a. Genez-aX Fund
t. 3,XannJ. ng Department:
2o~ 'c.~e f LzwI: X 0 aortas
i
pXua $3 per each
~ s ~ of $~
(3) It~4e ~
s. aanaz. a3.~
LL ·
plus $366 vben Eulm~tted t:o
Plan
~zu 13t vlmn eUmitte~ to
(3)
57
Fatal Year
1990-91
53.6
Z8
734
41
2
58
121
366
XO
29
349
28
ORDINANCE 671.4
Fisc~ Year
199~91
Fee
l
2-
3
4
S
6
8
9
lO
ll
13
14
17
) 11
20
22
23
34
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
The tees required Zor ~n appeal
de~eruine~lon to require an BIR
proJet.: shall be as follows:
a. General Fun4
i. Plann~nq DeparUen~
LL. load Depart:sent: -
Cosprehensive TransporUtion
(2) ARRSA~ ,^ sa~ ~ ~,'Rld~J~a ...
a. General Fund
i. Plinninq Delmrtamnt:
ii, Road Depertmn~ -
Coupreaensive Tanspotation
93
7
9
in liverside County mIX be as foilms
The appropriate fee, as listed be~ov,
Jail 8ocxmlmny the application and im
1371
103
103
1
2
3
S
6
7
xO
IZ
:1.2
Z3
14
17
:3,9
31
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3Z
32
33
34
35
ORDINANCE 671.4
(3)
Conpreheno~ve TnnoporUt~on
Plan
..plu $8. per ovner'8 pe~ion
per contra~t upon approve1
application_ (non-re.fun4~..1..e) __
,riI4,-k14~IRIDt' ,,~T, t'vil~ ,'~@ art
,P, VPl,'~14m-al Preserve
oener,s petition plus $103 per
Conprehensive TrensporUtion
'1"
(3)
(4)
a, OeneraXb
I. p~enning Depertsent per
~ontru~
Cuap~lve Transportation
Plan
Fiscal Year
1990-91
110
8
103
103
8
8
103
8
1345
100
59
!j
1.
.2
3
4
S
6
?
8
9
3.0
X2
Z3
X4
XS
3.6
Z9
20
2X
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
3X
32
33
34
35
36
37
38.
39
ORDINANCE 671.4
(s)
(6)
of an
~o Fee
N^+4q of N^n-vttttlLL
General Fund
i. Planning Depar~men~
ii, Road Delmrtaent -
Coaprehensive Transportation
Zoos rot Resolution No. 85-330, fixing
slmll be paid to the County Surveyor and
deposited into the (ZonereX l~ml, and sdmll be
u lollms
Berylfie Easements Put~uan~
and n4~XS_~Ja.aj~tnn S~O0.
(~) General ye~ation-
e, Genaral rund
i, Survey
(2) S~"'Fy
e, General ~
i, Survey
(X) f~a.B~m4-4n~ lk,k14e !eiir. LiZfi
i, Burvery
~lus $65 per otroe~ name
Year
X99~gX ('
53
4X55
920
22.0
65
65
6O L,
X
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
XO
XX
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X8
X9
20
2Z
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
4Z
42
43
ORDINANCE 671.4
· he foliovim/fees are hereby esUblished to
defray the estisated reasonable ~osU of
providing searches of County archives end
parlorsing remrch on planning infomtion
relst. edto land use Batters, as and when
toquestad. The fees shall be paid to the
Planair.- Departant and deposi~.l in the
~~ at $6.75 pr m~ Z/4
or f~ion ~e~f rot ~fom~on
or d~U ~l~ an Mt m~ly
avail~le ~
i, pl~~ ~p~nt.
Znfo~tion
$4S ~ ~ of muff t~
~t~ at $XX.25 ~r
or Zn~ion ~e~Z for ~fomtion
or ~~ ~l~ are
avail~le ~
a. ~nl ~ ·
varifi~tion
048 ~ ~ of surf t~
a,~~
6X
Fueal Year
1990-91
4s/hr,
4s/hr.
1
2
3
4
S
6
'7
8
10
1.1.
12
3.3
14
15
-.1.6
18
1.9
20
33.
33
33
34
35
26
2"7
28
30
3:1.
32
33
34
35
36
35
39
40
41
42
43
44
SECTION ~- This Ordinsn~ shsll ~k~ effect 60 cl~ s/t~r tl~ cl~ of adoption
GERALD A. MALONE~
Clerk of r. he Board
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUI
OF ~F,, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
62
·
5
6
8
9
10
:1.1
:1.2
3.3
14
15
16
17
18
Z9
20
23
24
25
28
29
30
3:1.
32
33
34
35
36
37
31
39
40
42
43
44
46
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF IUVEI~SID!Z)
I HISU~Y CER~ that at · rsgular inssting of the Board of Sularvisors of said
amnty Item on "' ,19 , tim foregoing ordino,,ce consisting of
sections was adopted by said Board by the following vote:
AYES:
NOF. S:
Sopel~_rl
OE~4LD ~, ~L4LONEY
Cl8'kttthsBoard
(,s~)
md671.4
63
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
LAND ,DEVELOPMENT/INSPECTION SERVICES
Lecml Documents
FEE SCHEDULE
( JUNE 1990 )
Lot Line Adjustment
Certificate of Correction
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional Certificate of Compliance
Certificate of Parcel Merger
Vacations Summary/Full
Document Clearance and Processing
Condemnation ( initial deposit )
Reversion to acreage -'
Map Checkincl
$600.00
$6oo.oo
$6o0.00
$6oo.oo
$800.00
$200.00
$2,000.00 deposit
$750.00
Parcel Map
Monument Review
Tract Map
Monument Review
Amended Map ( parcel i; tract )
qth and subsequent submittals
$750.00+$20/Iot
5~ of mon. bond or
$250.00 minimum
$7S0.00+$2011ot
5~ of mon. bond or
$250.00 minimum
$200.00 per sheet
$100.00 par sheet
Studies
FEMA Study Review (CLOMR, LOMR)
LOMA
Drainage (Prior to project approval)
Traffic (Prior to project approval)
$1,200.00 up to 150
ec.
$2, qO0, O0 over 150
$780.00
PLAN CHECKING
The initial submittal dr improvement plans and final maps for Engineering
Dep~t~e:~t review shall be accompanied by the design engineer's
construction cost estimate (based upon Riverside County Road Department
unit mats) and full payment of land development checking fees as specified
hereln. The City Engine shall prepare the final construction cost
estimate and establish the final plan check fee. Should the initially
submitted plan checking fees be determined to be Inadequate, the balance
due shall be paid prior to the approval of any maps or plans.
-I-
June, 1990
Improvement Plans
On -site
Off-site
Revisions
Gradinq Plans
One lot residential
Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits,
Public Use Permits
Stockpile
Subdivisions
Rough Grading Plan
(Total cost of construction)
First. $20,000 q%
Next $80,000 3.5%
Over $100,000 3.25%
( Total cost of construction )
First $20,000 q%
Next $80,000 3.5%
Over $100,000 3.25%
$200.00 or as
directed by
City Engineer
the
$300.00 ( 0-500 cu. yd. )
$500.00 ( 500 cu.
yd. and above)
$500.00 ( 0-5,000 cu.
yds. )
$750.00 (5,000-100,000
cu. yds. )
$1,000 + $501for
each addt'l 10,000
cu. yd. over
100,000
$300 (0-500 cu. yd. )
$qO0 (5,000-100,000
cu. yd. )
$500 ( over 1 O0.000
cu. yd. )
$500 ( 0-5,000 cu.
yd. )
$750 (5,ooo-loo, ooo
cu. yd. )
$1,000 + $50/for
each addt'l 10,000
cu. yd. over
100,000
-2-
June, lggO
Precise Grading Plan
$511ot (0-50 lots)
$250 + $~llot
(50-100 lots)
$q50 + $311ot (over
100 lots)
Plan Revision
Landscapinq Plans ( CSD }
$200 or directed by
City Engineer
On-site, off-site
1-3 submittals
q rtn g submittal
I1~ of cost estimate
$1001sht.
INSPECTION AND TESTING
Engineering Inspection end Testing fees shall be based upon the final
umstruction cost estimate and established as specified herein. All fees for
inspection and testing shall be paid prior to the issuance of the permit.
Improvements
Off-site ( Total cost of construction )
On-site (parking lot)
Overtim Inspection
First $20,000 q. 0~
Next $80,000 3.5%
Over $100,000 3.25%
Cost + 11)~
Landscapinq ( CSD )
1-3 submittals
qth return and submittal
q% of cost estimate
$100/sheet
Rouqh Gradinq
0-500 cu. yd.
SIN)- 10,000 cu. yd.
10,000 & above cu. yd.
$250.00
$350.00
$700.00
Soils TestinQ
Subdivision
per lot
retest
Cost + 10%
Cost + 10%
Trenches
Mainline g Laterals
I test every 300 linear feet
Cost + 10%
-3-
June, 1990
PERMITS
Pools
Prior and post construction
Gredinq
50 cu. yd. or less
51 - 100 cu. yd.
101 - 1,000 cu. yd.
1,001 - 10,000 cu. yd.
10,001 to 100,000 cu. yd.
100,001 cu. yd. or more
Camstruction
Cancrete sidewalk
Pedestrian Benches
Bus Stop Ares
Drainage Structure
Parkway Drains
Cancrete Gutters
Street Lights
DrivewaylCc,,,iK;, 'cial
Driveway/Residential
Curb/Curb i; Gutter
Excavation/Street Xing
Excavation/Parallel
$100.00
$15.00
$22.50
$22.50 for I st 1 O0
cu. yd.
$10.50 for each
addt'l 100 cu. yd.
$117.00 for 1st
1,000 cu. yd.
$9.00 for each
addt'l 1,000 cu. yd.
$198.00 for 1st
10,000 cu. yd.
f40.SO for esch
addt'l 10,000 yd.
$562. O0 for I st
100,000 cu. yd. .'
$22.50 for esch
addt'l 10,000 cu. yd.
Issuance Fee $25.00 +
$50.00 + O.051LF
over 100'
Issuance Fee $25.00
esch
Issuance Fee $25,00 +
+ 5% e. st. cost
Issuance Fee $25.00 +
$500,00 each
Issuance Fee $25.00 +
5~ est, cost
Issuance Fee $25,00 +
$qO.OO esch
Issuance Fee $25,00 +
$50,00 rain + $0.151LF
Issuance Fee $25,00 +
5~ est. cost
$100.00 es.
$75.00 ea.
$75.00
$125 rain or $11LF
$125 + $.251LF
June, 1990
Other Permits
Block Party
Movie Filming
Tree Trimming
Optional Monthly
Blanket Pemit
( Utility companies only )
Service Cuts
Main Line
USA Service
Street Closures
Pedestrian Protection
Blockwall ( incl. retaining )
Miscellaneous Construction
Transportation Peruits
Oversized or Overweight Vehicles
SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION DIVISION
Land and Assessment Division Applications
with amended assessment diagram
without amended ; ssnsment diagram
Special Districts Formation/Application
Issuance Fee $25.00
Issuance Fee $25.00 +
$50.00/day
Issuance Fee $25.00 +
$25.00 each
Issuance Fee $25.00 +
$10.00/cut
$25, + $11LF of
excavation
$25, + $1/LF of
excavation
No Fee
$25.00 + $50 for ea.
calendar day of
pproved closure
125.00
$25, + 5% of cost
estimate
$25, + amount deter-
mined by the City
Engineer
Annual Pemit $60.00
Single Trip Pemit
$20.00
$375 + $151parcel
$575 + $151parcel
$2,000 initial de-
posit + 1% of bond
issue cost
-5-
Sht. 1 of 4
(lOOt of btiaated
r~,jaf, xk-v4^,,
(SOt o~ b'L*Laated
t"'sfmett'rnt',,t"'f^~ rrke,l..j..l'
b Boed Samants to the amzeg 8500,00,
2of4
CCb'~
q.O0
90.00
40.00
9.00
10.00
6.00
~elqOO.QO
~.O0
4.QQ
~.OQ
6q.O0
7q.O0
qq.O0
~40~.00
e~O00. O0
flubtota].l
20% ConCiageacy:
~mlmm. waB
11/8~
Sht:.
30:[ 4
S=
it' gad"wrl
10*
1')· 1a1-~,.1 'trio
4=
10=
1,~=
~.,,= ,,u,,h ,-.r: ,, ( S · )
~'b.e ,,j.~,_.,4-, (4')
40 a'fy. lt'4t-t. 4nGZ,,t
6" Wfq,'~. l'4'J-l-4nlFe
10'
llllC/Ftffm
20% ~ ~ ,qpncyt
XZ/89
!he.
Sht, 4 oZ 4
TT~
4' V.P-.P.
S' V.P.P.
A' V.(?.P.
10' V.~.P.
12° V.C.P.
RfmMmI-.4
9.00
11 .O0
11.00
18.00 ·
22.0,
S4000.O0
e4000.oo
qoo~,Oo
9q.O0
':tO0.O0
100.00
90.00
aW1T]WT,
BTIbtDt~J.l
·
|
$
,e
·
:
:
·
g$1$ElRlJ$6 FEE COtPMISOR FOR SMPLE
~S as of June 16, I~
IllliE LOT COIIERCI&
Ibp: O lots
!alr. leo.: S20,004 cut eat.
6.P. liev.t 425 c.y.
I#. losJet.: $20,094 cost
Total Cost:
BiliLL iES. IEVELOP~ENT
Nap:
iopr. leo.:
3 lots
636,004 cut fit.
3 dents
6.P. liev.: 3,000 c.y.
IN- Iraopec.: S3i,0M cost eat.
:
:
Total Cost:
:
:
:tiED. $ES, IEV. (15 lots)
: Rap: 15 lots
: !opr. liev.: $120,04)0 cost oat.
: 5 detts
:
: 6.P. lev.: ]5,04e c.y.
:
: lap. Irapet.: S120,004 cost oat.
:
:
: Total Cost:
:
: LG. lIES. KV. (75 lots)
: Rap: 75 lots
: let. leo.: H50~000 cost oat.
: i2 skeets
: 6.P. left.: 105,004 c.y.
:
:
: IN. iespec.: H20,004 cost ost.
:
:
: Total Cost:
:
:
Proposed : City of
City of : Norato
Timcola: Valley
I
I
I
I
I
$500.04: S504.04
I
I
M04.04: M04.04
:
S2,104.04: $2,10e.04
:
I
!
:
di0.04: SIS0.00
$J,260.00: $1,260.00
:
:
S504.04: S500.00
I
:
$i,2&0.00:
:
: .......
$3,130.04: $3,830.00
:
:
:
91,050.04: $1,050.00
S3,904.04: t3,904.04
:
:
$750.00: S750.00
:
:
t3,900.04: S3,1e0.04
:
:
S9,604.04: S~,&04.04
:
:
S2,250.04: 62,250.04
$i4,625.04: $14s&25.04
:
:
$1,000.04: S1,004.00
S50.04: S50.04
:
S14,&25.04: $14,625.00
:
: .....
S32,550.H: $32,550.04
:
:
City of : City of
Corona : Cbie
:
:
S1,204.04: Sl,202.04
$525.04: $94.97
: N3. 2
:
M04.00: $4d0.04
-. :
:
:
:
$2,&25.04: S800.52
$1,620.00: $i.502.50
: S566.50
:
$1,500.00: $296.48
: S3&.24
$1,440.00: S762.50
: $267. l 0
:
$7,185.0e: S4,251.M
:
:
:
S2,9ZS.04:
H,200.04:
$i,930.50
:
Sl,&0e.00: 9489.62
: $111.61
:
S4,M0.04:
: $976.50
$i3,525.0~: S|0,7i4.73
:
:
:
H,425.00: S2,H0.20
: $5,375.00
'.
$1,b0e.00: t1~562.65
S180.00 ', t63.60
:
s16,Oeo.oe .. Ht460.04
: s2,700.04
:
s39,950.00: $25,141.45
County of
liverside
$1,060.04
$1,420.00
S720.04
H5.04
11,0M.04
S3,265.04
S1,355.00
$2,400.00
S45.04
$15.00
$3,600.04
$7,415.04
Sl,955.04
$t,004.04
$174.00
$13,500.04
S24,&26.04
ASSUMPTIONS FOR '*TYPICAL" DEVELOPMENTS
1. Single Lot/Commercial Development
Single Lot: No Map
Improvement Cost: 11120,000. O0
3 Sheets of Improvement Plans
Grading: ~25 C.Y.
3 Lots:
Improvement Cost:
2. Small Residential Development
Parcel Map Required
$12,000.00 Per Parcel = $36,000.00
3 Sheets of Improvement Plans
Grading: 3,0000
3. Medium Residential Development
15 Lots:
Improvement Cost:
Grading
Tract Map Required
$8,000.00 Per Lot = $120,000.00
S Sheets of Improvement Plans
15,000 C.Y.
II. IJrge Residential Development
75 Lots:
Improvement Cost:
Grading:
Tract Map Required
:1;6,000. O0 Per Lot -- 14150, 000. O0
12 Sheets of Improvement Plans
105,000 C.Y.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: TITLE: DEPT HD ~
MTG: 7/St Iq~ ROUTE 15 CXTY ATTY
DEPT:Gt,~mu-..~.t' FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT CITY MGR /-~ ?~
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council APPROVE the attached Freeway Maintenance Agreement and
authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement.
DISCUSSION
The County of Riverside, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula, has
previously agreed and consented to certain adjustments of the then County Road
system required for the development of State Highway Route 15 as a freeway.
The City has incorporated these areas from the County and has assumed the
obligation of maintenance of specified portions of this system from the County
under these agreements. The attached agreement, promulgated by CalTrans, is
to clarify the division of maintenance responsibility as to separation structures,
City streets or portions thereof, and landscaped areas within the freeway limits
and to replace the County with the City in these requirements. The specific
maintenance responsibilities are detailed in the agreement.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached agreement for
freeway maintenance and specified portions of Route 15.
STATE C/CAUFOINIA--BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231
SAN BERNARDIt, K), CALIFORNIA 92402
TDD (714) 38,1-4609
~l.l. ne 4 ~ 1990
Frank Aleshire
City Manager
P. O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
J U N 5 ,ggO
08-RIV-15
PM 3.2/7.6
GEC~GE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
Dear Mr. Aleshire:
Enclosed are three originals of a Freeway Maintenance Agreement
and three copies of the vicinity map and exhibits for Route 15.
Because of the many stages of development of the freeway system
in the County and the subsequent incorporations/annexations by
the Cities, there are a number of maintenance documents involving
both the Cities and the County.
We are currently updating these documents relating to freeway
matters between the City/County and the State for ease of
reference by both parties and to further clarify areas of control
and maintenance responsibilities.
The accompanying agreement details the maintenance
responsibilities of the State and the City relative to the
freeway and related City facilities and conforms with the
Freeway Agreement(s) entered into by the County and the State.
If, after review, the Freeway Maintenance Agreement appears to be
in order, will you please arrange to have the necessary
signatures placed thereon.
Please execute and return two copies, along with an original of
the City's resolution sheet to this office, retaining the other
copy for your files. A fully executed copy will be provided for
your files when approved.
If you have any questions, please call Bob Bader at 383-4596.
· GREG B. ~IREZ, P. E
Maintenance Engineer
RAB / rw
Enc
FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into, in duplicate this
day of , 1990, by and between the State of
California, acting by and through the Department of
Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "the STATE", and the
City of TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "the CITY",
witnesseth:
WHEREAS, freeway agreements were executed between Riverside
County and the STATE, wherein Riverside County agreed and
consented to certain adjustments of the COUNTY road system
required for the development of that portion of State Highway
Route 15, within the current limits of the CITY OF TEMECULA, as a
freeway, and the CITY has annexed areas within the COUNTY and has
assumed the obligation of maintenance from the COUNTY and
WHEREAS, said freeway has now been completed (or: is
nearing completion) and the parties hereto mutually desire to
clarify the division of maintenance responsibility as to
separation structures, and CITY streets or portions thereof and
landscaped areas, with the freeway limits, and
WHEREAS, under the above freeway agreements, the CITY has
resumed or annexed control and maintenance over each of the
relocated or reconstructed CITY streets except of those portions
thereof adopted as a part of the freeway proper.
MAINTENANCE DEFINED:
Maintenance is defined in Section 27b of the Streets and
Highways Code as follows:
Sec. 27. "(a) The preservation and keeping of rights of way, each
type of roadway, structure, safety convenience or
device, planting, illumination equipment and other
facility, in the safe and usable condition to which
it has been improved or constructed, but does not
include reconstruction or other improvement.
(b) Operation of special safety conveniences and
devices, and illuminating equipment.
(c) The special or emergency maintenance or repair
necessitated by accidents or by storms or other.
weather conditions, slides, settlements or other
unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway,
structure or facility."
1
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
When a planned future improvement has been constructed,
a minor revision has been effected within the limits of
the freeway herein described or when limits have been
revised by annexation, which affect the division of
maintenance, the Department will provide a new dated
and revised Exhibit "A", which is made a part hereof by
this reference, which will supersede the original
exhibit and which will become part of this agreement.
2. VEHICULAR OVERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the entire
structure below the deck surface except as hereinafter
provided. The CITY will maintain, at CITY expense, the
deck and/or surfacing and shall perform such work as
may be necessary to provide an impervious and otherwise
suitable surface. The CITY will also maintain all
portions of the structure above the bridge deck, as
above specified, including lighting installations, as
well as all traffic service facilities (signals, signs,
pavement markings, etc.) that may be required for the
benefit or control of CITY street traffic.
At such locations as shall be determined by the STATE,
screening shall be placed by STATE on STATE freeway
overpasses on which pedestrians are allowed (as
directed by Section 92.6 of the Streets and Highways
Code). All screens installed under this program will
be maintained by the STATE (at STATE expense).
3. VEHICULAR UNDERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain the structure proper. The
roadway section, including the traveled way, shoulders,
curbs, sidewalks, walls (including eliminating
graffiti), drainage installations, lighting
installations and traffic service facilities that may
be required for the benefit or control of CITY street
traffic will be maintained by the CITY.
4. PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the entire
structure below the top of the concrete deck surface,
exclusive of any surface treatment thereon. The CITY
will maintain, at CITY expense, the top of the concrete
deck surface, together with any surface treatment
thereon, and all portions of the structure above the
concrete deck surface, EXCEPT SCREENING which will be
maintained by the STATE at STATE expense, and shall
perform such other work as may be necessary to provide
an impervious and otherwise suitable surface. The CITY
will also maintain all traffic service facilities
provided for the benefit or control of pedestrian
traffic.
5. PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING
The STATE will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. The CITY will maintain all drainage and
lighting installations and will be responsible for all
cleaning and painting, including but not limited to
keeping the structure free of debris and graffiti.
6. SOUND WALLS
The STATE will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. If there be any responsibility for
cleaning and painting to keep the CITY's side of the
structure free of debris and graffiti, it shall lie
with the CITY and not with the STATE.
7. LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO CROSSING STRUCTURES
If there be any responsibility for maintenance of any
plantings or other types of roadside development lying
outside of the area reserved for freeway use, it shall
lie with the CITY and not with the STATE.
8. INTERCHANGE OPERATION
It is the responsibility of the STATE to provide
efficient operation of freeway interchanges including
ramp connections to local streets. The STATE will not
pay for the maintenance, repair, servicing, or power
for ordinary street lighting; however, lighting at
intersections which qualifies as safety lighting under
current warrants will be paid for by the STATE. The
maintenance and operation costs of safety lighting,
traffic signals or other necessary electrically
operated traffic control devices at ramp connections to
CITY streets shall be shared, between the STATE and the
CITY on a prorate basis in the same ratio as the number
of legs of the interchange under each jurisdiction
bears to the total number of legs. Timing of traffic
signals shall be the responsibility of the STATE.
9. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended
to create duties or obligations to or rights in third
parties not parties to this contract or affect the
legal liability of either party to the contract by
imposing any standard of care respecting the
maintenance of State highways different from the
standard of care imposed by law.
It is understood and agreed that neither the STATE, nor
any officer or employee thereof, is responsible for any
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything
done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to the CITY under this Freeway Maintenance
Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, the CITY
shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of
California, all officers and employees from all claims,
suits or actions of every name, kind and description
brought for or on account of injuries to or death of
any person or damage to property resulting from
anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under
or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this
agreement.
The CITY waives any and all rights to any type of
express and implied indemnity against the STATE, its
officers and employees arising from any work, authority
or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this
agreement.
10. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement supersedes previous Freeway Maintenance
Agreements entered into by the STATE and the CITY on
Route 15 and shall be effective upon the date of its
execution by the STATE, it being understood and agreed,
however, that the execution of this Freeway Maintenance
Agreement shall not affect any pre-existing obligations
of the CITY to maintain designated areas pursuant to
prior written notice from the STATE that work in such
areas, which the CITY has agreed to maintain pursuant
to the terms of the Freeway Agreement, has been
completed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands
and seals the day and year first above written.
CITY OF
Mayor
City Clerk
Approved as to form and procedure:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROBERT K. BEST
Director of Transportation
Attorney
Department of Transportation
District Director
City Attorney
By
5
W
U
'"r
X
UJ
0
~ CO
a 0
/°
-r
x
uj
o
o ,~
'~ ~o
E ~
--_1 '-
u~: u
O\ 0
FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into, in duplicate this
__day of , 1990, by and between the State of
California, acting by and through the Department of
Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "the STATE", and the
City of TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "the CITY",
witnesseth:
WHEREAS, freeway agreements were executed between Riverside
County and the STATE, wherein Riverside County agreed and
consented to certain adjustments of the COUNTY road system
required for the development of that portion of State Highway
Route 15, within the current limits of the CITY OF TEMECULA, as a
freeway, and the CITY has annexed areas within the COUNTY and has
assumed the obligation of maintenance from the COUNTY and
WHEREAS, said freeway has now been completed (or: is
nearing completion) and the parties hereto mutually desire to
clarify the division of maintenance responsibility as to
separation structures, and CITY streets or portions thereof and
landscaped areas, with the freeway limits, and
WHEREAS, under the above freeway agreements, the CITY has
resumed or annexed control and maintenance over each of the
relocated or reconstructed CITY streets except of those portions
thereof adopted as a part of the freeway proper.
MAINTENANCE DEFINED:
Maintenance is defined in Section 27b of the Streets and
Highways Code as follows:
Sec. 27. "(a) The preservation and keeping of rights of way, each
type of roadway, structure, safety convenience or
device, planting, illumination equipment and other
facility, in the safe and usable condition to which
it has been improved or constructed, but does not
include reconstruction or other improvement.
(b) Operation of special safety conveniences and
devices, and illuminating equipment.
(c) The special or emergency maintenance or repair
necessitated by accidents or by storms or other
weather conditions, slides, settlements or other
unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway,
structure or facility."
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
When a planned future improvement has been constructed,
a minor revision has been effected within the limits of
the freeway herein described or when limits have been
revised by annexation, which affect the division of
maintenance, the Department will provide a new dated
and revised Exhibit "A", which is made a part hereof by
this reference, which will supersede the original
exhibit and which will become part of this agreement.
2. VEHICULAR OVERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the entire
structure below the deck surface except as hereinafter
provided. The CITY will maintain, at CITY expense, the
deck and/or surfacing and shall perform such work as
may be necessary to provide an impervious and otherwise
suitable surface. The CITY will also maintain all
portions of the structure above the bridge deck, as
above specified, including lighting installations, as
well as all traffic service facilities (signals, signs,
pavement markings, etc.) that may be required for the
benefit or control of CITY street traffic.
At such locations as shall be determined by the STATE,
screening shall be placed by STATE on STATE freeway
overpasses on which pedestrians are allowed (as
directed by Section 92.6 of the Streets and Highways
Code). All screens installed under this program will
be maintained by the STATE (at STATE expense).
3. VEHICULAR UNDERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain the structure proper. The
roadway section, including the traveled way, shoulders,
curbs, sidewalks, walls (including eliminating
graffiti), drainage installations, lighting
installations and traffic service facilities that may
be required for the benefit or control of CITY street
traffic will be maintained by the CITY.
4. PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the entire
structure below the top of the concrete deck surface,
exclusive of any surface treatment thereon. The CITY
will maintain, at CITY expense, the top of the concrete
deck surface, together with any surface treatment
thereon, and all portions of the structure above the
concrete deck surface, EXCEPT SCREENING which will be
maintained by the STATE at STATE expense, and shall
perform such other work as may be necessary to provide
an impervious and otherwise suitable surface. The CITY
will also maintain all traffic service facilities
provided for the benefit or control of pedestrian
traffic.
5. PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING
The STATE will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. The CITY will maintain all drainage and
lighting installations and will be responsible for all
cleaning and painting, including but not limited to
keeping the structure free of debris and graffiti.
6. SOUND WALLS
The STATE will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. If there be any responsibility for
cleaning and painting to keep the CITY's side of the
structure free of debris and graffiti, it shall lie
with the CITY and not with the STATE.
7. LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO CROSSING STRUCTURES
If there be any responsibility for maintenance of any
plantings or other types of roadside development lying
outside of the area reserved for freeway use, it shall
lie with the CITY and not with the STATE.
8. INTERCHANGE OPERATION
It is the responsibility of the STATE to provide
efficient operation of freeway interchanges including
ramp connections to local streets. The STATE will not
pay for the maintenance, repair, servicing, or power
for ordinary street lighting; however, lighting at
intersections which qualifies as safety lighting under
current warrants will be paid for by the STATE. The
maintenance and operation costs of safety lighting,
traffic signals or other necessary electrically
operated traffic control devices at ramp connections to
CITY streets shall be shared, between the STATE and the
CITY on a prorate basis in the same ratio as the number
of legs of the interchange under each jurisdiction
bears to the total number of legs. Timing of traffic
signals shall be the responsibility of the STATE.
9. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended
to create duties or obligations to or rights in third
parties not parties to this contract or affect the
3
legal liability of either party to the contract by
imposing any standard of care respecting the
maintenance of State highways different from the
standard of care imposed by law.
It is understood and agreed that neither the STATE, nor
any officer or employee thereof, is responsible for any
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything
done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to the CITY under this Freeway Maintenance
Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, the CITY
shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of
California, all officers and employees from all claims,
suits or actions of every name, kind and description
brought for or on account of injuries to or death of
any person or damage to property resulting from
anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under
or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this
agreement.
The CITY waives any and all rights to any type of
express and implied indemnity against the STATE, its
officers and employees arising from any work, authority
or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this
agreement.
10. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement supersedes previous Freeway Maintenance
Agreements entered into by the STATE and the CITY on
Route 15 and shall be effective upon the date of its
execution by the STATE, it being understood and agreed,
however, that the execution of this Freeway Maintenance
Agreement shall not affect any pre-existing obligations
of the CITY to maintain designated areas pursuant to
prior written notice from the STATE that work in such
areas, which the CITY has agreed to maintain pursuant
to the terms of the Freeway Agreement, has been
completed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands
and seals the day and year first above written.
CITY OF
By
Mayor
City Clerk
Approved as to form and procedure:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROBERT K. BEST
Director of Transportation
Attorney
Department of Transportation
By
District Director
City Attorney
By
5
/
0 ~'
I
0
~,~
:I::
X
I.u
I,-
W
uj
uj
uj
9
,1
$
u~ u
Ox, 0
I-
W
uJ
W
uj
6
Z
· tEE
h 0
o
H 0
,.-- t- 0
_,j --
u
0
FMATEMEC. UI.A
FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into, in duplicate this
__day of , 1990, by and between the State of
California, acting by and through the Department of
Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "the STATE", and the
City of TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "the CITY",
witnesseth:
WHEREAS, freeway agreements were executed between Riverside
County and the STATE, wherein Riverside County agreed and
consented to certain adjustments of the COUNTY road system
required for the development of that portion of State Highway
Route 15, within the current limits of the CITY OF TEMECULA, as a
freeway, and the CITY has annexed areas within the COUNTY and has
assumed the obligation of maintenance from the COUNTY and
WHEREAS, said freeway has now been completed (or: is
nearing completion) and the parties hereto mutually desire to
clarify the division of maintenance responsibility as to
separation structures, and CITY streets or portions thereof and
landscaped areas, with the freeway limits, and
WHEREAS, under the above freeway agreements, the CITY has
resumed or annexed control and maintenance over each of the
relocated or reconstructed CITY streets except of those portions
thereof adopted as a part of the freeway proper.
MAINTENANCE DEFINED:
Maintenance is defined in Section 27b of the Streets and
Highways Code as follows:
Sec. 27. "(a) The preservation and keeping of rights of way, each
type of roadway, structure, safety convenience or
device, planting, illumination equipment and other
facility, in the safe and usable condition to which
it has been improved or constructed, but does not
include reconstruction or other improvement.
(b) Operation of special safety conveniences and
devices, and illuminating equipment.
(c) The special or emergency maintenance or repair
necessitated by accidents or by storms or other
weather conditions, slides, settlements or other
unusual or unexpected damage to a roadway,
structure or facility."
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
When a planned future improvement has been constructed,
a minor revision has been effected within the limits of
the freeway herein described or when limits have been
revised by annexation, which affect the division of
maintenance, the Department will provide a new dated
and revised Exhibit "A", which is made a part hereof by
this reference, which will supersede the original
exhibit and which will become part of this agreement.
2. VEHICULAR OVERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the entire
structure below the deck surface except as hereinafter
provided. The CITY will maintain, at CITY expense, the
deck and/or surfacing and shall perform such work as
may be necessary to provide an impervious and otherwise
suitable surface. The CITY will also maintain all
portions of the structure above the bridge deck, as
above specified, including lighting installations, as
well as all traffic service facilities (signals, signs,
pavement markings, etc.) that may be required for the
benefit or control of CITY street traffic.
At such locations as shall be determined by the STATE,
screening shall be placed by STATE on STATE freeway
overpasses on which pedestrians are allowed (as
directed by Section 92.6 of the Streets and Highways
Code). All screens installed under this program will
be maintained by the STATE (at STATE expense).
3. VEHICULAR UNDERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain the structure proper. The
roadway section, including the traveled way, shoulders,
curbs, sidewalks, walls (including eliminating
graffiti), drainage installations, lighting
installations and traffic service facilities that may
be required for the benefit or control of CITY street
traffic will be maintained by the CITY.
4. PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSINGS
The STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the entire
structure below the top of the concrete deck surface,
exclusive of any surface treatment thereon. The CITY
will maintain, at CITY expense, the top of the concrete
deck surface, together with any surface treatment
thereon, and all portions of the structure above the
concrete deck surface, EXCEPT SCREENING which will be
maintained by the STATE at STATE expense, and shall
2
perform such other work as may be necessary to provide
an impervious and otherwise suitable surface. The CITY
will also maintain all traffic service facilities
provided for the benefit or control of pedestrian
traffic.
5. PEDESTRIAN UNDERCROSSING
The STATE will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. The CITY will maintain all drainage and
lighting installations and will be responsible for all
cleaning and painting, including but not limited to
keeping the structure free of debris and graffiti.
6. SOUND WALLS
The STATE will maintain the structure from a structural
standpoint. If there be any responsibility for
cleaning and painting to keep the CITY's side of the
structure free of debris and graffiti, it shall lie
with the CITY and not with the STATE.
7. LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO CROSSING STRUCTURES
If there be any responsibility for maintenance of any
plantings or other types of roadside development lying
outside of the area reserved for freeway use, it shall
lie with the CITY and not with the STATE.
8. INTERCHANGE OPERATION
It is the responsibility of the STATE to provide
efficient operation of freeway interchanges including
ramp connections to local streets. The STATE will not
pay for the maintenance, repair, servicing, or power
for ordinary street lighting; however, lighting at
intersections which qualifies as safety lighting under
current warrants will be paid for by the STATE. The
maintenance and operation costs of safety lighting,
traffic signals or other necessary electrically
operated traffic control devices at ramp connections to
CITY streets shall be shared, between the STATE and the
CITY on a prorata basis in the same ratio as the number
of legs of the interchange under each jurisdiction
bears to the total number of legs. Timing of traffic
signals shall be the responsibility of the STATE.
9. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended
to create duties or obligations to or rights in third
parties not parties to this contract or affect the
legal liability of either party to the contract by
imposing any standard of care respecting the
maintenance of State highways different from the
standard of care imposed by law.
It is understood and agreed that neither the STATE, nor
any officer or employee thereof, is responsible for any
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything
done or omitted to be done by the CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to the CITY under this Freeway Maintenance
Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, the CITY
shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of
California, all officers and employees from all claims,
suits or actions of every name, kind and description
brought for or on account of injuries to or death of
any person or damage to property resulting from
anything done or omitted to be done by the CITY under
or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this
agreement.
The CITY waives any and all rights to any type of
express and implied indemnity against the STATE, its
officers and employees arising from any work, authority
or jurisdiction delegated to the CITY under this
agreement.
10. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement supersedes previous Freeway Maintenance
Agreements entered into by the STATE and the CITY on
Route 15 and shall be effective upon the date of its
execution by the STATE, it being understood and agreed,
however, that the execution of this Freeway Maintenance
Agreement shall not affect any pre-existing obligations
of the CITY to maintain designated areas pursuant to
prior written notice from the STATE that work in such
areas, which the CITY has agreed to maintain pursuant
to the terms of the Freeway Agreement, has been
completed.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands
and seals the day and year first above written.
CITY OF
By
Mayor
City Clerk
Approved as to form and procedure:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROBERT K. BEST
Director of Transportation
Attorney
Department of Transportation
By
District Director
City Attorney
By
6
',,
vl
u_
~' 0
I-
W
IM
3:
I,-
W
uj
/°
i
.-- \
-1,-
x
LI.J
1
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: 7/31/90
HTG:
DEPTyM'IS
TXTLE:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY HALL LEASE AGREEMENT
That the City Council
Manager to enter into
DEPT ATT, f~
CZTY
CXTY HGR
authorize the City
a lease agreement
between the City of Temecula and Windsor
Partners - Rancho Industrial for office space
located at Windsor Park I, 43180 Business Park
Drive, Suite 200, for a period of five months.
BACKGROUND: The City Hall purchase is scheduled for the
August 14, 1990 City Council Meeting. The attached lease is recommended
for approval now so that telephones could be installed, the computer network
can be moved, and Finance Department can be relocated to the new space as
soon as possible. When the City Council approves the City Hall purchase, this
lease will become null and void and new lease executed in conjuction with the
City Hall purchase.
The current City Hall is severely overcrowded. The City Manager has
expressed his desire to hire new employees in the very near future; therefore,
additional office space is required. Next to Willdan in Building "A" is an 1,057
square foot office space currently vacant and improved. The lease period is
five months and will expire either on December 31, 1990 or upon the
Council's approval of the City Hall purchase, which ever occurs first. The lease
payments are $1.12 a square foot, exactly the same amount charged for the
Willdan office space.
The City Manager desires to move the entire Finance Department to this area
in order to create more office space at the current City Hall and to locate the
Finance Department, which is tasked with cashiering and contract
administration, closer to the Community Development functions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Monies are available in this year's office rent
budget.
A TTA CHMENT:
Lease Agreement.
NET OFFICE LEASE
TABLE 0F CONTENTS
1. LEASE OF PREMISES ................................................... 1
2. EXHIBITS AND ADDENDA ................................................ 1
3. DEFINITIONS .......................................................... 1
4. DELIVERY OF POSSESSION ............................................. 2
5. ACCEFTANCE .......................................................... 2
6, USE; LIMITATIONS ON USE .............................................. 2
7. RENT; OPERATING EXPENSES ........................................... 3
8. TAXES; ASSESSMENTS .................................................. 3
9. MAINTENANCE ........................................................ 4
10. UTILITIES AND SERVICES ............................................... 4
11, INDEMNITY AND EXCULPATION; INSURANCE ............................... 5
12. ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS, IMPROVEMENTS ............................... 5
13. MECHANICS' LIENS ..................................................... 5
14. DESTRUCTION ........................................................ 6
15 CONDEMNATION ....................................................... 6
16. ASSIGNMENT ......................................................... 7
17. DEFAULT .............................................................. 7
18. ADVERTISING .......................................................... 8
19, LANDLORD'S ENTRY ON PREMISES ...................................... 8
20. OFFSET STATEMENT, ATrORNMENT, SUBORDINATION ...................... 9
21. NOTICE ............................................................... 9
22 WAIVER .............................................................. 9
23 SALE OR TRANSFER OF PREMISES ...................................... 9
24. ATTORNEYS' FEES ..................................................... 9
25 SURRENDER OF PREMISES; HOLDING OVER .............................. 9
26 ABANDONMENT ........................................................ 10
2/. QUIET ENJOYMENT ..................................................... 10
28 FORCE MAJEURE ...................................................... 10
29. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES .............................................. 10
30. GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................. 10
NET OFFICE LEASE
I~ndsor Partners - liancho Zndustr~al
General Partnership
The Ctty of Temecula
California Corporation
Jul~ 18
1. LEASE OF PREMISES.
1.1. In consideration of the Rent (Is defined in Section ?.1) and the provisions of this Lease. Landlord leases to Tenant and
Tin·n· ~ from Landkxd the Primate shown by dilgonit lines on the floor plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A; ' and further described
in Section 3,1~t The Premises are located within the Building described in Section 3,14. Tenant ·hall have the non-exclusNe right (unlesS
ethanvise pKwlded harem) in common with Landlord, olher Saints, sulXenents and invifees, to use of the Common Areas (as defined
1~.. Tenant has examine<l the Premises and is fulh/inlonned of their condition.
1-q This LIIIe cOnbff, nO rights either with regard to the aubeudace of the lind below the ground level of the Premises or with
regard TO m above the lop of the mot of the building that is a part of the Premiles.
2, EXHIBITS AND ADOENDA.
The exhlits and addendl listed below (unless lined out) Ire incorporated by telfenCe in this Lease:
2.1. Exhibit 'A" -- Floor Pin Showing the Premises.
2.2. Exhibit "B"-- Site Plan of the Proiect.
2.4. Exhibit "D"-- Rules and
2~ i: See Addends
RI oaecl in mis I. else, the lollowing terms sh/li haw the following meanings:
3.1. b Rent: $ Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred Stx and 08/100 .................. ($14,206,08)
3~. lase ~br. TM calendar War of 1990
3,t leeira(e) Iml kles Agent(I): lesttier Cramerda1 Brokerage
per year.
3,4. COlfi. 411Ceff4,'~l Dlte: Jul.y 18, 1990
3.5. C~mmim Atoll: All areas within the exterior bounder:as of the Project trlit are provided and designated by Landlord, froff~
time to time, for the general Use and convenience of the tenants of the Building and which are not liased or held for the exclusive
use of Tenant or other tenants of the Building. Cammarl Areas include, but are no~ limited to, pedestrian wllkw~ys, ~itio$, lindsclped
~ planted IreH. Ik:lewitks, mice corrk:lors, restrooms, mairways, throughways, loading ere·S, parking areas, driveways and rOads.
3.6 Colt Of Living NNultment RInSe: (fill in it ipplicable) Minimum 5 ol Mlximum 5 %.
-qT. ~ Stop: (fi, in if applicae4e): $ N/A
3J. Expimlxl DIre: December 31, 1990 , unlifa otherwise mr terminated
m accordlace with the provisionl of this Lease.
3.1.Mdex (See·los 7.2): Unilcl Stmes Department of Labor. Bureau of Lalxx Stitistecs Consumer Pace Index for All Urban
Conlumevt LOI AngelislLong Beich/Anlheim Average, Subgroup "All Items" (1167 . 100).
3,10.Landlal'a Mailing &ddmss: 29377 Rancho California ROad, Suite ZOO
Temecul a, CA 92390
TenIra'· Me·ling Ntdmss: 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite ZOO
Temecula, CA 92390 ($1,183,84.)
311. Monthly istellmente of ~ Rent: $ One Thousand One Hundred E~ohty Three and 84/],00 ..... par month.
312. llrtong: Telant Shitl be parrre·led TO park 4 Cat~ on · non-excluSive besS· in the area(s) designated by
Landtorcl tar parkrag
3,13. PromSial: That 13o~4xl of the Building containing Ipproximitely 1,057 square feet
Of ~ Area, m~wn by chagonal lines on Exhit~t "A."
3.14. Proleer: A aldti-tonlm office/commercial real property development of Landlord locited It 43].80 lius~ness Park
Drive, $utte ZOO, Teaecula, CA 92390 and described In Exhibit "B"
The Plqect includes the lind, the Building and III olhet improvements located thereon, including the Common Areas. The ProWct m known aS lltndsor Park !
3.15 Rentebl Am8: As to the Premraes. the measurements of ftoo~ area aS may. from tffne to time, de subject to lease by
Tevlnl Ind MI mints of the Buitding, mspeclrvely, aS cletermmed by Llndlorcl and ippilid on · coniCtent ~ throughout the Building
3.16 lecurtty Spa·it {Section 7,4): $ IlIA
3.17. TenlN's Fiat t qb'ate, ~1~Di~(iect~n7~2):The~r~cliyofthecItencirm~nthtOli~qtheC~m~nca~t~t.Dmep~us
!we,re (12) months.
3.18, Tenl~'e Pm RE·8 ~ism: 1,5 Ii. Such share is I hlction, the numeralor of which is the Ran·able
Am· of the Promrues, lad the ~lenominator of which il the RentibM Area of the 8uiKling, aS cletermined by Landlc~cl from time to t~ne.
3.1~. lyreare UN CIMSe (Ames I): Benoral 0ff~ce
320. Tens: The parioel oommencing on the Commencement Date anti expiring It midnight on the Experet~on Date.
3.21. 1aide NMm: The City of Temecula
3.22.
Allmilton: Any liditK)n or Chlnge io, or ~lon of, the Premises made by Tenant Ifier !he lixturing period, including,
~ Rlp,.lelvl: Any officer, IgeN, lmploWe, o~ inclepandent contrlctor riteSned or Iff~ by ~ Plfly, acting
w~hinauthOrifygwenhimbythitParty.
CMmage: Inlury, deteradmire, or lois to · par·on or m clueeel by lad·her pert, on'· Icts or milsions. Damage inducles
Denap~:Ammearycm¶penM~morir~emnifymItcanberecwere~mthe;~urtsbyanypem~w~hassuffemddama~e
Desltuct~n: Any demlge to or tlfiguflfiwnl of the Premises.
Encumbrance: Any 0acl of tn~. mortgage. or deer wrmen security dewce ~' Igreement affecting the Premises, and the note
or offier ctligilton slcurecl by ~t, Ihat corlstdutaS $ecurlly for the payment of a deDt or performance of in oOtiglt~on
Expiration' The Com:n~ TO In end of a time DerKX:I spec:hec ~n the Lease. Including, without lim,tat~on. lay exlens~on of the
term resuRmg tram tlqe exercise of an oDhon TO extend
1 WTNDC);gNET ~12~1 ~I~86
C_-ood__ ConditK)n: The good phys~cit cOndit,on of the Primrues anti each port:on o~ the Premises, mcluding, without limitsimon,
Fe~',~, windows. show inniOwa, ippurtenlnces, end Tenint's personal property "In good condition' means firsl-cless, neat. clean.
t~;eTrcleen, Ilxl iI equwelent to s~miler phrms referring !0 physical adequacy m appearance and for use.
Hold Hlrff~: To cl~ Ind in~mfy from ell lisl~ity, __q__ , penaRes, cleftrages. __,,J~t__. expenses (including, without I:fnttst~on.
Ittomey's lees). causes of icfion, cleims, of judgments arising out of of rallied Io any dimage, Is defined hereinshore, to any person
of re-
Law: Any judiciit decision, STITUTe, constitution, ordinlnce, lute. regulation, rule, edministretivl {xder, ex other requirement
OI Iny munK:q)ll, county, Ilite, federal, Of othof government agency of luthonty hlving junsdictson over the Pities cx' the Premises,
Of belh, in effect either It the time o~ execution of the Lease Of it Iny time during the term, including, without limitation, any regulit,On
Of on:lof of I Quasi-official entity Or body (e.g., board of fire examiners ot public utilities).
Lien: A chlrge im~_e~__ on the Premises by m other then LandlOrd, by which the Premises ire mlcle SeCurity for the
Ixdv,,,ance of in act. Molt of the liens referred to in this I,ahtse ire roechin,ca' liens. Mainename: Ripearl, rll;ilcement, repelnting Ind ctllning.
Plrty: Shah mean Llndkxd Of Tenant; IN:l if morn than one perIon m entity is Landkxcl of Tenant, the obligitions imposed
on thit Pen? shall he joint and ssvofel.
Penon: One Of more human beings, Or legal entities Of other Irtificiel persons, including, without limitation, pa~nerships,
m, fluits, estates, assoCiitlons, and any combination of human beings end legN antitea.
Provision: Any term, Igreement, covenant, condition, clause, cluefificition, reiriction, resen~t,on, Or nthof stipulate in the
Lalse thit defines Or otherwise conlmis, astal)lishes, Of limits the lance required Of permaid by either Pldy.
Flestoretm: The rf,,~,mctidn, rebuilding, rehabilitation, end replhl thit Ire necessary to return clestroyed portions of the
F~ Incl other praperty to lulxlntielly the same phyml condition in which flee/m immediately bekxe the destruction.
b m of this Lease, to the rights Of obligations ot either Parly.
Tenant: A person Of INity (Of their successor in interest) who has signed · valid ixisting lease for I Iplce in the Project.
Tenant's Improvement: Any Idclition to o~ modification of the Premises made by Tenant before. at, Of heir the commencement
of the lerrn, including, without limitation, fixtures (not including Tenant's Irade fixtures).
Tenant's Personal Propely: Tenem's eduq:)mem, furniture, merchandise, Ind movable pm~ pieced in the Premises by
Tenant, including Tenent's Im0e fixtures.
Tenant's Trade Fixtures: Any Woperty rolled in ~' on the Premises by Tonlnt lot purposes of trade, mlnufacture, ofnlment,
Ternanal:on: The ending of the term before ex4xratmn for any relso~.
4.1. If !or lny relson lendlOrd cloe$ no~ deliver possession of the Premises to Tenin on the Commencement Dale. lendlord
shall nol be Sub/act to any liability kY Such failure, the Expiret,on Dite shill not change end the velidity of this Lease shall not be impaired,
I)UT Rent shall be abited until detwofy of ~:~_~s___cession. "Delivery of possession" shill be deemed to occur on the date lendlorcl complies
Llndtcm:!'s Work as defined in Exhibit "C.' ff Landlord permits Tenant to enter into I~"~t____eee, SiOn of the Premises bofore the Commencement
Date, luch ~N~S__SeSS~ ehell be lubject to Ihe provisions of this Lease, including, without Imlltatlon, the payment of Rent.
5.1. Tenlnt's taking m~on of the Premises on conlmence,~4nt of the m shill constitute Tenant'l Icknoadldgc,,cnt
that the I~ Ire in good con(lition.
6. USE; LIMITATIONS ON USE.
6.1. Tenant Ihell use the Prenises solely for the purposes set ~ m me Tenant's Use Clause end for no mr use without
I, Bndk3~'s writeft
Tenant shall condua its Qusines~ at the Prem:ses under the trade name set forlh in the Tenant's Trade Name Clause end under
no othe Irade name unless firi mining the written consent of Landlord.
6-2. Tenlnt's use of the Premises as provided in this Lease Shill be in iccofdance with the followrag:
5.2.1. Tenant shall hat Clo, bring, Ot keep anything in Or liDout the Prime thlt will cause S cancellltion of any
insurance COvering the Prime.
If the rate of any insurance caffiecl by Landlord is increased as · result of Tenant's use, Tenant shall pay to Landlord within
ten (10) dlys belOre the clite Landlofcl is obhgated to pay I premium on the insurance, o~ within ten (10) days liter Lindlofcl delivers
to Tenant · cerlilisd statement from Landlord's insurance carrWr Stating thit the rite increase was caused solely by in activity of Tenant
on the Promises, as permitIN:l in this Lease, whichever date is later, · sum equal to 1he difference between the Original premium
the incmasecl mum.
5.2.2. Tenlnt shall comply with Iny mister Covenants, Conclitmns and Remnctions which encumber the reel property
on which the Pre~Nses ere located.
6.23 Tenant shall comply with Ill laws concerning the Premises Or Tenant'S use of the Premises, including, without
limillid6, the obligation it Tenant's cast to liter, maintain, Of restore the Premises in com¢4isnce and conformity with ell laws relating
to the condition, ule, Of occuglncy of the Premises during the term.
6.2.4. Tenant shell nol use the Premises in any miranet that will constitute waste. nuisance of an tmrelsonible annoyance
I0 the quail enjoymlfit of the m of the Building (including, without limitation, the use of loudspeakers Or lotand Or light Ipparetus
the can be heard Of seen outlkte the Premises).
Tense shell not m ~e Prwnises lot leaping. washing clothes, cooking. Of the preparm,on, manufacture, Of mixing of
anyruing mit m.~r,t emit any udof of c~jectmnable nomes or ligms.
6.2.5. Tenant shell not do anything on the Premises thit will cause damage to me Premises. Any overloading of
Ilectficof circuits Ihel! be Ihl fllponlibility of Tenant. No enlchmery, Ipplretus. Of other ipplilme 111111 be uled or operated in of
on me Pm, mises that will in any manner' injure, vilyme, Of shake me Premises.
5.~'.6 Tenant .hall not displey Of sell merchandise Of Illow ca~. portable signs. devices Of other objects to he stored
Or amain Outside the cMinld m In(I paffnanent ~c.~-,ayl of the Premises.
5.2.7. Aftm alxNng lot business. Tenant Ihell cominuouely remain open kx Ixaliness it least those dlys end hours as
is cumamary Ims business of e ko character in the city m which the Promrues are situated. 5.2A Tenam shell not conauct Of permit iny site by auction on the Premises.
6.29. Te~lnt shill hive for its ,ale Ind benefit the non-asclulive ~gN in common with Landlord and future owners,
other lieants Ind their agents, employees, customere, lienslea, mjIXinints anti ell others to whom landlOrd his grinted ~ ely grant
such rights, to use the Common AreIs {luring the entire term of this Lelle, Of any extenmon thereof, for ingress end Igress, roadway,
lutomoble parking Ind siclewllks. Tenlnt shell hive the nor~ush~ right to use the number of parking Iplces ctes|gnited in the
Plrkq Cllule. However, LandleRI shall, it ill times, hive N rigN Ind PfiW of determin:ng the nature and actant of the Common
AreIs Ind 01 making such chingas which in its otxmon ire Seemed to be clesirebM. Such changes may include. but Shill nol he limited
TO. cBnvefiing the Comm~ Arel~ m lelllble IreIs. cofiltructing I~lit~OnN parking llcilites m lhe Common Areas. increasing Or
cleofeuing Goretoo6 Aree land analof ficilit,es. the loce~ofi Ind rNocit|on of Or,veweys. entrences. exits. eutofnobile parking spaces.
me cleecl,on and flow of ireif:c. elelllt,ofi of prohibited ereas. lendsclped eress. and ell other facilites thereof Tenlnt ecknowiedges
mat such actlv~ws may result in OCClSeOnll inconvenmnce to Tenant. Nolhlng Contimed herein Shall be ~teemed to creale any liability
upon Landlore as · result ot se,:l changes m for any damage to motor vehicles of cuatome~ ~ employees or for lOSS of property from
wiifw~ SuCh malof veh,cles. vnins caused by the noghgence of landlord. its agents. minis o~ employees
W|NDO~Cl~ hIE' i129) 11~86
patrols and servsCe-_e'_~%~dlerS of Tenant. and other tenints of Landlord who mike use el slid Ireis ;nm with the rules and
fegulatm istablished by Landloccl from time to time wdh respect thereto. The nghts of Tenlnt hereunder. ,n and to the Common Areas,
Ihatl, at III times, be sulc~cf to the rights ~ Landkx'd, other tenants of the Bulldin~ and Ill others to whom Landlot6 his grinted such
~ to ule the lime m cosmos1 with Tenant. Tenant shatl not, at any lime, intarlere with the rkOhts el Landlord, other tenants, of
~ny~If~rp~r~m~ntit~ec~tou~NC~mm~nArO~s~lt~h~bethedu~yelTen~nttok~p~C~mm~nAre~fme~ndcM~of~ny
otmlTvctions created of permitted by Tenant of resulting from Tenanr$ operation and to permit the u~e of any of the perking and roadway
H, in the opinion of Landlo~l, unauthorized m am umng any Common Areas by reason of the penerie of Tenant in the
IraTemiss, Tenant, ulxe dimand el Landlo~, shill m such Fights against III $uch unauthor~T, ed m by Ippfl:q)~le
Nothie9 heroin slmll iifect the rights of Landlord, at iny time, to remove any such unluthorized persons h'om the Common Areas of
to rislrmn the m el any el the Common Area by unauthorized persons.
6,2.10, TenIN agrees to comply with such relsonable rules ind regulltfons in the use of the Premises and the Common
AreIs u Landinn:l rely Idopt from time to time for th~ ofderly and proper opmition of the Project. Tenant shatl m its ~ Ifforts
Io cause othms who use the Commo~ Ar~u with Ten~nt's express of implied mission ~o mbide by Landiord's rum ind re~ulm~ons.
~__,d~_ ruiss ram/inclucle, but are m limited to, the following:
(~ Normal business bourn;
(i) The hours dum~ which the Common Areas shatl be open for use:
(i') The restricting el eml:~4oyee parking to I limited, cissi~nmed area or ~reis ancl the imposition of fines for
h m~ulat~on of removal, mofa~e Ind dispml of Tenlm's r~u$~ and other rub~sh.
6,2.11. Tenram shall m use, sisre, h~ndle of m el Iny hez~rdous wa~es of sum on the Premises or any
pro1 el the I~ct. The tarm "l'mzmdous u~ates of substances," is ~ in this sectm in im ~ m sense and includes, but
mbmslo~, PCBs Ind olher chemical products,
7.1. All co~s and m w~ich Ten~,m Issumes or m~rees Io pay to Landlofd under this Le~e shall be deemed idditionat
Isl-elf, prm~ notice, of deff~nd, the Rent, in edvance, on the first dey of i~ch month, commencing on the Commencemere Date
con~inuif~duhn~theTem.B~seRentforthe~ratm~mh~p~nionelit~h~bep~idup~nexecuti~nofthisLam~BameRemf~t
~nyp~niNmonth~h~bepmrmec~atthemteof1~3~thoftheE~se~q*n~perd~y.Them~flermntsh~bep~y~blein~cc~rdancewith
h~ mcluimd. AH m ShNI be paid to Landford at th~ eddrm prayidol at the I~inning el this
7.2. The Iraaunt of Blse Rent (and the corresponding Monthly Inatatlments el Blse Rent) paylble herlund~ shill be ~djumed
Innually (the "Adjuslmen~ DIe'*), commencing on Tenlnt's First Adjustment Date. Adjustments, i~ Iny, shill be ~ upon increases
(if Iny) in the Incisx. The Index in Ix~tilicat~on thrse (3) months befofs the Commencemere D~te shNI be the "BIs~ Iridex." On eish
Ad~nt Die, the Blse Rent shill be increised by i parcentage equal to the percentage increm, if any, in the Inclex in publr, ation
rome (3) months before the Adjustmere Date (the "Compa,son Index") over the B~se Index ("ldjusted Base Rent"). In the event the
Compar~so~q ~ in Iny y~ir is less then the Comparison Index (of ~ Index, is the case my be) for the preceding War, the Base
~c1m~ha~mmainN~mou~tofB~meRemp~/ab~eduringthe~3~(;~:~ingy~When1h~c~ju~edB~eRentp~y~b~eisofeachAdjustment
i is cidermined, ~ shill 0n~ Tenant writtin nohce of Such Icljulted Bame Rim ind the mennar in which it wls computed.
The ~ljuated Bus Rent shatl merHfilr be the "B~se Req~t*' Iof ill mjr,~o~es undm th~ Lea.
ff at Iny ~ Date the Ins'Ix no Ion~er lists in the form Clescribed in this LalSe, LanctforCl my subetituta iny sul~tenti~lly
eclui~iem ~ inclm laul~ish~l by the Burelu of ~ Stmist~cs of its successor. I, mqdlofcl Shatl use m'q ~X~ri~tl conyemen
letore to accoml~ish such submitre,on. The substitute inclex shatl then decores the "Index" 'hemunCler.
me Cos~ of Livin9 Adjusm~t Rings Cl~usl.
7~. If this ~ terminates before the ~xl~ratio4q clme for telsons other th~n Ter~nt's default, B~se Rent shill be prorated
to the date of Wminatm, Ind Landlord Shill immm:liately repay to Tenant Ill Blse Pent th~n preplid ind unelrned.
7.4. On I=~cutfon of this Lolse, Tenant shill deposit with LandlOrd tht ~cufity Deposit for the performlnce by Tenant of the
peows~ons of this L~. If Tenant is m default. Landlord can use the ~Curity Dipo~it, or any portion of it, to cure the cl~lult of to
compensate Landto~ Iof any {tamag~ suslain~d by Landlord resulting from Tenant 'S Cllfault. Tenira shill immediately on demand pay
to Llnclinfd i sum eQuil to the port|on of the S~curity Deposit i~pended of Ipplild by Landfo~d is provided in th~ Section Io is to
mlmtein the Sicmy Depos:t in the sum initillly dipsshed with Landtotal. ff Tenant ~$ nil in default at the ispirat|o~ or termination
of Ih~ Lease. Lancltofd shatl raturn the ~urity Deposit to Tenlnt, ~ any Iraaunts required to matore th~ Primira to ~ canalman
and repair, i.r~_.~__,dq~. dln~ge resulting from the removal by Tinant of its trade fixtures of ~cluipment. Landfo~d's o~ligatH~ns with respecx
in Ih~ ,~urity ~ m ~ of I dNxor and n~ i truatse. Landlord cln mlmtain the Sl~urity ~ separatl and apart from
Landford's ~ fu~ts of can commit~le the Security Deposit with Landford's general Ind omer fun{Is. Lanclio~l sl~ll n~ be rocluired
~o p,y Tenam intorest on the S~curity Deposit.
7.5. FoI' putpoles of thm Arlicis. Operating Expenm Shall meln III elitact ~ of operation Ind meintenance, is determined
by ~ ~ prlctic~ incfudmg. ~ not limited to. Common Area expertre, real properly taxes, meintermnce, rapiers, utilittes,
Tenlnt Shall ply to Landford, is Idditio~ll rent, TenIm's Pro Rite Shire of such Operating Expemes in the Ioffowing sinnat:
7.& 1. Tenam shah pay to Landlord, Is eddit~onal refit, on the first {Sly of each calendar month of the term el this Lea_se,
m~m~n~(NattoL~ndk~rs~Nat~atimae(b~sedonL~ndfon:r~-h`~---~---~---v--`"~dIfgum~)ofTen~n~m~th~yPf~Ri~S~w~eelthe~pereting
Expemms.
7.5.2. Wiminth~y{3~)daysfe~kxvingtheendofeachcNendaryear~LandfordshaHfu~ahTenamwlth~mmemenfc~vering
thecalenaryearjuste;ired(cer~ifisdIsc~ectbyanauth~ized~pris~datraofLandfom~ofifrequesi:~byamaj~rityofthetanants
in N Building by I cartif~d public accountant) showing (i) the total Operating Expanses; (ii) the Iraaunt of Tenlm'l Pro Rata Sham
el such Ol)eratm9 Expefiles Iof such calendar yelr; and (iii) the payments made by Tenint with respect to such period Is Set forth
in Sectio~ 7~I. If Tee~nl's peyments e~cled Tenlnt'l PrO Rata Shire el such Operating Expermes, Tenants Ilalt de entitled to offset
the moils 191mat the net paymess due Landkxd Is sat forth in Section 7.5.1. However, H Tenant 's Pro Rata Shire of such Operating
Expenses m Tefant's plymints, Tenant shall ply LandfoR! the ~leficisncy within te~ (10) days Iftef fecmpl of such Itatament.
In additmn, Tenanrs Pro Rata Share of the total Operating Expenles Tm' the previ(xas calef~dar yelr shatl be used Is In Istimate for
the c~ffeet yeer and pokl to LifetoN p~rsuant to the m of Sictie, 7.5.1.
7.5~ LJndtordmay~atits~ixm~byserV:ceofwrine~n~ticeonTenam.ch~setoaIfer~nypeyme~tparfocispr~vK:~ed
for by this Lease under the Adicles titled "RaN; Operatkng ExDefises:' "TaxIs: A.Heuments," "idNntenance" end "lndemn~/and
I, TAXES; AIRMEN11.
6,1. Tenlnt slsatl ply, before de~h'~luency, atl axes, Illellments, license fees Ind other chlrges ("fixes' ') that Ire levied
Inlssed aglansl Tenlnrs plflonat property inatatled of located in of on the Press, In(I that tiecOme payll)le durmg the term. On
demand by Landlord, Tefianl shatl furnish Landlord with set~iflctory evidence of thele plymints.
Whenever polsd)le. Tefilnt shill cause se:cl trade fixtures. furnishrags, eduipment and personat property to be separately
Issessed It. however. any taxes on Tenant's pefsonll pro;erty am lev~:l againin Landlord or Landlord's Ic)rol)erty. o~ it the Issessed
val~, of The Prim;sis :S :ncrelsed I)y the ~ncluslon of a value placed on Tenant's personal property. and :f Landlord pays the taxes
on any of these 4eros of the taxes lased on the mcreised assessment of these items. Tenant, on demand. shall ~mmedjatily re:ml)urse
WINDOFF NET (12~11~6
Laft~:~thesumofthet~es~ev~:~gain~Landkxd~ormeF~z~nofthetaxesres~mn~am~s~
Landkx(i shill hive the nglM to pay these taxes regardless of the validity of the levy.
82 Tenant shill ply to Landlord, m the manner provide<l :n Sechon 7,~. Tenlnt'S Pro Rata Shire. of Ill real oro0~ly taxes
lad genwll and special assessments ("real property taxes") livid and assessed agamst the lend. buiidq. and other ~mpr0v~mentS
of which the Premises are · part.
[3. ~ lay generll or Ipeci~l aeSlll ~,ant m ~ and assessed mgiin~ the Premises which uriclet the laws then m ~
ram/I~ lvidlnc~d by iml:m:wement or ofhet ~o,~.5 and rely be ~ in annual in~t~l|ments. only the amount of SuCh ·nnu·l iniflllmont.
wilh ~ IXOtlt~orl Ior Iny parlill y~lr. IrlcI interest thorIon. shill be includl~ within · computif0on OI ~ ~
&4. Tw..mnt shall pay to Lindlord any and all ~xciH. i~'tvi~ and other taxes (tXher than ·if income and aslifo tmxoS} levlecl
or ms··sod by any todeml. sial· or local ·umority ("taxi.~g authority"} upon the rant recewo<l by Lindlorcl hereunder. Tenant shall ·iso
pray to LlndlO~ lay business fix impotod upon Llndlo~l by any tlxing authority whether Or not such tlx s blmKI or mo~sureCI.
e or in part, by amounts chargod to To~lm or ricewOol by Landlord fre~ Tenant undot ths Lore4.
8.5. ~Ifany~im0c~urif~th0~0rmofthisa~0ny~xingauthoritysha~Iftmth~mIfh~d~and/orIfandan:~softoxIfmand/or
t IsI w..;.M {"llx pimn"}, in who~ or in pan. I0 as to umpooo a tlx pfan in lieu of or in addition to the tax pfan in o~istonco u of tho
/ of ~ Lllle. luch 11xo$ or asle~sm~nts ~ upo~ such/tored fix pfan including: (i) any tlx. If40ssmont. lacclt4. surch~r~fi.
fat ponllty, ~,,~, or limiler imposition ("impositio,f') whether or nof in lieu. partially or tolally. o~ any impol4t~ons asoost4cl against
tho llncl. builc~. Incl ~ i~ of which the Premises am · parl poor to lay Ifterations in the tlx plln; (ii) any imposit~qs
on Lindlord's ti~ to re~ or olhor i~come from the Prominos or ogainsl Landlord's business of leasing the Prem~4s; (iii) any imposit~qs
~ to or molsured by the ma of the Prernim or tho rent payable heroundor. including without limitmt~o~ lay impositions lev~d
by any laxlag authority with raspoct to such rental or with respect to the ~-os____*essson. leasing. operation. rnanagoment. mainton·ace.
Mlmmlion. mpmir. use or occupancy by Tenant of the Prem~sos or any pottin therfiof; (iv) any impositions upon this Liase trannction
er any documom to which Tenam is a pa~/which oroifes or transfers any interes~ or estate m or to the Premmes; and (v} any spic~al.
&G. Tenln!'s liability to pay ~ property tmxes fill De proreted o~ the basis of a 365 day mr to account for any Irectmnal
Fortinn of · fmcaJ year included in the tim at its Comm~nc~rtmnt aod exl~rlhon.
I MAINTENANCE,
maimam the enlim Premises in ~ lenantal~ con~ibon ·nd raptar, including without lirn:lat~on Ifl 8dditmP4 and imptorments made
by the Tenant as ~ as all ilems of maintenance, ·llerif~on, or reconstructs0· mif may be require0 by · governmental agency having
~ W. If Tenant fails to keep the Premises in Hid cond,t~on, Lindkxd sh·ll ~ the nght, I~ Llndtord's o~X~on, to enter
ell ~ in 0Kfaf to piece ·1me in !he rl(luired condit~ofi and raplit. Tenint Shall ~mmediltely pay to Lindlord the cost thereof,
~ w~h inletelf It the mlximum rife IIIow~l by isw
9.2. Lindtotal Ihlll mX hlvl Ifly rl~3onsibility to Ill·tim the Prem~es. Tenlnt. at · mltefial part of the cortsiOeflt~n rendered
to Landlofi:l. ifi 8Hating irdo this Lelse. Ileflby walv$$ the Fovis~ns of Civd Code S4ct~ofi 19dl and 1942 with respGcl to Lindloed's
obligificn tot lenantability ol the Promises and Tenant's ,ght to make repairs and deduct the expense of such repairs !tOm rent
9.3. I. Indtord shall. If Tenant's co~t. keep and maintam all widow and door glass. utilitms. fixlureS and mechlnal
IQuipment. including any heating and/or air conditioning units senncing the Praises and used by Tenant (excluding Tenant's personal
Ixo0eqy lad tm0e fixtures). in ~ or0et. condition and replir. Tenam shall pay to Landlofcl. in the manner I:)fovided in Sectwon
Tlnafll's Pro RIll Share of lit such ramate·lace and repair costs
9.4, I.mn(:Notd shall keep in 9otx:i conditK)n and rsplur the roof an0 sltucturel ms. its of the Primrues. exclpl when such
~ and raplit is rmcHsitifld by mason o4 Tenant'l negIHalence, alteration o/or ICk:ht~n to the Praises, or beeuGh of any
IMm or condition of this Lellt Lindk:)fd fill ~ no C4:)l~lt~n to make any Such replirs until Landlord hll ticaired wf~ln f~X~ce
tn}m Tinam with ~ to the need for such replirs, and Lindlottl shall not be deemed to be in 0etanit with telpact to ds
to tapir unless Ind until Landlord has (i) received aid wrmen riolace and (ii) failed to make SuCh rapmrS within a re·Ion·hie period
Iolowin9 the receipt ol aid notice. ~ sheIt, liter ~lceiving written no(ice. exerc:f,e due diligence in making such replirs. Tenlit
heq4W m lay Fovisions of IIw pe~milting Tanlit to mike replirs It Lindlord's Ixpense. Lindlof~l shill eftforce any construcho~
eaTlies Ior the befiefit of Tenant to the ixtent that they Ire Maim.
9.5. Landk)rd 111111. If Tenlnt's cost, mainilia the Commo~ Areas in · nero, Cleln and orderly co·tilt:off lad raplit, I:)fopedy
lagbled In(I ilndiclped, and shifl operife the PTO~eCt, in Lindiord's SOle discre;off, IS · full cfass officelcoe'nmercill rill I:)foperty
~.,IOpT. S~t. NI I~penses of maintenance in CormaCtiOn with the Common Arias shill be charged and prorife<l in the manner set
Iollh in SeclKx17.5. it is understood lad ~ thlt the phrase "ape·sis in COnneCtion with said Commo~ Arias" shill mclude, ~
~ f~t be liffljtod to, III sums ~xpefxled in connection with said Common Areas for III 9enerel maintenance and replirs.
laintin9, rellq)in9, cfaanlng. Iwee~ng lad ilnitorill services; mainlena·ca lad repair of sidewllks. curbs, and Buik:ling mgns (ofher
than ksant's qn}, ~,~,-ade systems, pfantin9 and rang; eghting and ottw utilities; paint,t of aH exawtor euHaces of the 9uadm9
m ~ in the I:~qed; direchonal signs and o~her markers and bumpers; maintenance and replif of any ~rl pf01$Ctl0fl m,
au~mM~icsixi~MmsyIfems~ightingmmormminagesymemsandany~meruti~itysystoms;pers<mne~toimpiememsuchsehqce,
im:luding, il ~ daems necessary, the COif of secur~ guards and/or 811 colts and expenm parlaining to · security alarm system
~or~hetoeants~p~iceandikeFeactensewicas;peq~nalpr~perty~Ises~ev~e{~onormthbab;etopef~a~m~wnedbyLandkXd
which is coa4am~ in the operation or maintenance of the Commo~ Areas; dapreciatio~ and mmn(e~ance on operating nilchine·/
and eq~w~lnt ~ff owned) and rentll laid for luch mlchinery mn(I Iquipment (H rsmed); any parking chitgas, sufChlrges or any other
ca~s~eVle~oraesessedby~ca~morfadere~9~vemmenta~a9encesinc~nnectm~withtheuseofparkingfacitities~faesf~required
liclfllms Im:l permits; adequifl public Ifal~lity and prope~/damlge mlurance on the Commo~ ,Areas; resetN~s for exteo0t Hinting
sma~w~m~tiasm;sn~mss~ns~fa~i~vencetoLsnd~xdiorLindtord~ssupsvsionoftheseidC~mm~nAreas~wh~-h
cssss sny or sl of gs ssid sst, wces to be Ixovids:l by sn indspsnds,'~ tonirector or commclors.
10.1. Es:elX as IxoviOsd in Sec~idn 10.2, 'lbnam shall tusks al/srrengernems Ior and lay for all utilities and serv,ces fumishsd
10.2. in IM evsm thif any ufiitm are furnished by Lindtord, ssndlor~ Shsl| only be required to Ixov~e heating, sir conditioning
~ mores in ths building of which the Proroses am · part. Lsndlord shall noI be lis~e ks', and Yenera shsll noI be smitled to, any
mductS~ of mnts~ by resson of Lindlord's failure to furrash any utilitSas when such/allure ss csus~d by sccidsm, Ixesksge,
m IOODUB or ~thef ~ dimufoances or ~ clisOu~s of any chsrec~er, or by shy othor csuse, ssmilsr or clissSmiler, beyond The
undm any ciecumlances Ior · ~ of or injury to property. however occufflng. through or m connection with or inCidenlal to tli|ufe
to fwnlh In,/ot the !Oregoing. Wherever halt ganerifing talchines or I(lu;pment ire ~ m the Primisis which afiecl the
ethanrole maillied i)y Ihe mr conditioning system. Landlord raserveS the rghl to if'~,lll kapp4enll~ll~/lit CW~:litlofi~ng units in
Primisis in(I Ire ~ ttwrlot, mcluding the cost of inltIIlatm. ·nd the cost of 0peraim and Nin~nlnce themot shill be ;}lid by
10.4 Tenam may. al ~ expense, elect to mifall ~ own m~er toe any rodrues which am loamy malerod by while·
11.1. Ten~ntd~e~hem~indem~ty~s~ieb~ek~ndhof~sLand~rdh~rmlessfrom~ny~sstwmas~nof~uryto~
Of Ixoperty. from ~ CIUM, all 0f in ~rl co fifie, ctod with the cofidit.)n Of usa of the Premises 04, the im~nts Of personal
mvilaeL Of tm~plssl~ Tenant shill, II Tenam'· expense. resist and detend any such acbon, suit, or Ixoceeding Of cause the same
10 lie M Or ditended by counsel defagnited by Tenant and II~:)roved by Landlord. Tenlm's 0~ligition he~jnder shill survive
me Wninabon of Sis Lease, if the incident requiring Such de~nsa occurred during the Lease term.
11.2. Tenant, Is I ~ pan of the consideration refxlerad TO Landlord, in entering into this Lease, hereby waives all claim·
eraploWs·, invites·, Of any third pwson in or about the PremiSes from any cause al any lima.
11.31. LaRdlord shill enaimlin, It Tenant'$ expenle, a policy Of policies of insurance pmtoctiAg against the following:
(i) Fire and othe~ pa~iis normally included in the extended coverage insurance with special form. to the extent
of It telit one hundred procent (100~) of the inlurable v/us of the Ixjilding and other improvements on the Premises exclusive of
Irade fattufts and equipment belonging to Tenant;
(is') Rent loss insurance 10 fill rotten of It least one hundred pefcem (100%) of the annual gross rentals from
('i') Public liability and proItaly damage insurance and Ix~ducts liability insurance with respect to Common Areas
for the joint bene~t of landlord and Tenant in amoums (i) mX less than $1J00,000 for inlury or death to any one person, (iS) not less
than $1,{XX).000 I~' __hc~__,ffence, and (iii) m31 ~ thin S250,1~0 per occurrence for damage to property. bid amount ·hall be subject
10 adjustment every Ihme (3) 1fairs to the then primSling limits normally required for opm'Itions of the type conducted by Tenant on
11.3.2. TenIra shill ply Io Landlord, Is additional rent, and in the manner Wovided th Section 7,5, Tenlm's Pro Rata Share
of ~le coil d inssince mquir~l in Sectldn~ 11.3.1 Ind 11.3J.
11.3.3. Tenlnt shall malntlin in force I liticy Of policies of fire Ind ext~led coverage insurance with respect to its
~ix~ums and equipment ~caed in the Pmmises with vandalism and malicicus mischief endmaments to the emnt of It leam ~ne hundred
~ (100~) of their insurlble vllue. During the term of this Lease, the proceeds of any such policy Of policies of fire insurance
Shill Ix ulld sony for the split or replacement of the fixtures Of equipment so insurad. Landlord shall have nO Claim o~ interera in
Mid in~mnCe and wil ~gn all 6ocumants nscessaff to effectuSe me soillament of any claim or ldss by Tenant.
11 -~4. Tenlnl shill malf~in during the tara of this Lalse, with an insurance company acceptable to Landlofd, a
~,,,p4tL~ve genl,ll Itability insurance policy, ~ with I "lxold Iorm" Inclorsement, with respect to the Premises. for Ihe pint
baneIll ot landlord and Tenlnt for personal injuff in amo, nts ot not less than $500,000 tof injury Of death to any one person, and in
an Imoum mx Ii~ than $1,0Q0,000 per occuffence, and for Ixoptrly damage in In amount of not less thin $250,000 per occurra~ce.
Tl~ Imounts of such ~ liability insurance shall de iocraased from time to time Is Landlord may ralsonably datermini. Tenant shall
nlme Landlord Is additional insured on such policy. Tenant ·hell furnish Landlord with · certificate of insurance with respect to such
policy IX policis$ prkx to entry of the Premises.
11.3.5. Landlord and Tenant hereby mutually release each other from liebilily and waive all right to recover against each
{Xher from any loss from perils insured aglinst under their respective lira insurance pohc~es, including any extendeel coverage and
endo~ements to said policies. It is provided, however, that this subparagraph shall be inapplicable it it would hlv~ the effect, but only
10 the 8merit thlt it would have the effect. of invalidating any msurance coverage of Landk~l o~ Te~lnt. The Pans shall olXain. if Ivailble.
from meir respectwe slurinCa companies. · wawer of any righi of subrogatmn which said insurance company may have against the
Landkx~l Of the Tenant, Is the case sly be. in the event that the insurance cornpiny ot Tenant does noI waive the right of subrogmicn
aglinst ~ Ind i~ insurance company, Tenlnt ·hill (i) mainlain during the term of this Lelse firs legal lilt)italy coverage with
aspect 10 the Premises and (iS) shall ply to Landlord upon mind. Landkxd'l colt inCurred in socuring fire legal I~ll~lity prolacking
Landlo~lmtheevemofthedestrucbonofTenant'spmperly.
11,16 LaNltord m~y mal,ntmn, It the Tenant'$ expense (Ixo rated in the manna' described in Secbon 7,~), boils and
roachmen/msurance oel all Ix~iers, heating equipment, lit conditions9 eduipment, and ofher pressure vessels and systems that may
be lociled m, on. or Itmut the Praises. Tenant Shah rmmburae Landlofd Iof the mluranCe provided by Landkxd undm' this subparagraph
in accordance with the terms set foflh in Sectton 11.32.
113.7. All the ,nsurance required under this Lease ·hall:
(i) Be ~ssued by snsuranOe coalames luthorszed to do business in the State of Californii, with a financial rating
el It least superie stalus as rated in the most recent ed,t~on Of Best's Insurance Reports: (ii) Be =sued as a Iximary policy:
(iii) Contain an endo~ement requiring thifly (30) (lays writtIn riolice horn the insurance company to IxXh Landlord
Ind Llndlord'· ands before cancellation of change in the coverage, sco~e, Of Imount Of Iny pohcy
Elch policy, or I cetificl~e of the policy, logether with ev~enOe Of payment Of Ixemiums, shall be deposited with the mr
Plrty It the Con,,'~Llnclhint Of the lefms. and Is t~ rewwal of the poticy ncl less than twenty (20) dlys before e~piration Of the term
12. Ai3ERATIONS, ADDITIONS, IMPROVEMENTS.
desired by Tenam sMII be made by Lanexa only ~ter Tenant submits detailed fmal I~ans and drawings to Landlord and oblains Landlord's
Ippeovl Of such ptans. Any such alterationS, Ick:libon· or imlXOvemems Ihal~ be in contorrndy with the lies Of all Ipplicable government
luffmdlies ind exce¢ing movit34e rumslurs, trials fixtures, mlchinofy Ind other trade equipment shill blcome part of the realty and
~Ni~ng10~"and~Of:~Hewe~Land~Mc~nalect~withinttw1y(3~)days~xfommotthe~erm~OfwithinfNe(~)daY&~ertorminati~n
of~he~11~tof~cp~i~Tef1~v~1yal1er~tic~ddifi~Of~(~4h~iTe~nth~f11~detothe~femiseS~
Imm, ofwimin ton (10) days mftm'larminitmn Of the Laase. whichever is fiPq.
12.2. Tenant may install Irlde f, ma, ls, machinery o~ elher trMle equipment in contormance with the lies Of all Ippticit~e
~l~4,~w.~ suthofitieL Tenant m~/remove any of such eade fixtures Of machinery upon the expiration or Im'minaticn Of this Lelso;
Wevided the, Tenant is nee in default under the ~effns and conditions of this Lease.
12.3 16 N eenl ~ TartaN mils trade fixtures, machinery Of othe~ trade equipment, Tenint shitl mum the Premises on
eof lemineldn of the Leale10 the lame condate Is ~ It the dete of entry, masonable wear and !ear exceplld. In
Iny event, Tenlnt shel split Ire/{leaage mlulting f~m the ~ ertra~e fixtures, mlchinary or other trade equipment of Tenlnt.
13.1. Tenant~hItip~y~w~en~utal~cQIt~forc~n~ucti~nd~nebyitOfcius8dtobed~nebyIt~ntheP~Is
~ by this Lease. Tenant shall keep the building, emer improvements, and land bee and mr ot all mechanics' liens resulting
mnd~othOfmpen~e~on--m~.~`---~ntOfcimmsOfiienOf~alxx8raOfmieri~menOfothersf~rw~k~x~xmeaOfm~e~Ofsuppiies
tumlehedforTenamofperlonSoflimingunderif.
TN~nt ~ he4 the fight 10 ~ The m Or the validby of any such lien if, immediitity on demand by
I.in01o~, Tenlnl W01NraS Ind ricotall I lien rilelie bond isauld by · cofpomt~on luthofized to ~ SurNy bonds in C41ifomis in
an Imount equal to one an(I one-hitf times the amount of the clam of lien. The bond shall rnett the re(luiramentS of Civil Coae Section
3143 IN:I Shall IxovKle kx the payment of any ~ that the claimant may recover on the claim (together wifh costs Of suit. if ~t recovers
m me
5 WINDOFF NET it29i 11/86
14.1. if, (lunng the term. the Premises are totlily of part:ally destroyed by a nsk covered by the mlurlnce describe(I m
~ 113, rlfKlofmg the Prem,ses rally of partially inlccet~ble of unulible, Lindlord shatl restore the Prorheas to subatantlllly
the lime COnclifton m which they were ~mmediately before destruchon. The process of such restorehen Shill begin with· ninny (90)
{lays allm me date of iNstrucllon,
Such destruclmn shill nil le{minate this Lem. ~ the existing laws do nof permit the rsltorltion, either Party can terminate
Lease immedimely by giving mice to the ·he{ Party.
If the colt of the matoration exceeds the ranaunt at proceeds received from the insurance required under Section 11 ,~1, Lindlord
cln Illct to terminate this Lilse by giving rioface to Tenlnt within fifteen (15) dlys Ifter determining thai the restoration ~ will excted
the inlumnce proceeds. In the came of destructm of the Premises, if i, lndlord elects to terminate this Lnase, Tenant, within fifteen
(15) 6lye after receiving Landlord'· mice to terminate can elect to pay to Lindkxd, at the time Tenant notifies Landlord of its electson,
the dillsfence beN·an !t~ amount of insurance proceeds and the colt 01 reatoratson; in whx:h case, Lindloccl shatl restore the Premises.
LIn~lofd shill giv~ Tenlnt satisfaclory evidence that lit lures Conlrtl~ by Tenlnt Is I}KNided in ~ Section hive been expanded
by Landlord in paying the cosl of rastoration.
IfL~nd~¢c~ecistotormin~to~hisLe~seandTen~nt~e~m~4ecttoc~ntribute~rdthec~s~ofraat~mtmMpr~videdin
~ Section, this Lease shall torminNe.
14.2. H, ~ the term, !~ Premises era tolllly of padility mroyed horn I risk nof covered by the insurance described
Siclion 11,3, rendering the Premises toeally ix pert|atly inaccessible of unusabta, LindtOKI Sh~ll restore the Premises to substantially
I~ lame condifion in which they were immediately before destruction. The process of such mstofatlo~ Ihlll begin within ninely (~0)
~ ~er the ~ et deatruct~on. Such destructson shall nof terminate lh~s Lease,
Howeve{, if the coat of realoration exceeds five percent (5%) of the then replacement value of the portion of the Premises that
~re{~eimyed~L~ndlOK~c8neiscttotarminatethisLeasebygivingnoficetoTenantwithin~ftsen(15)days8fte{date{min|ngmerastomti~n
in the case of deslruction to the Promrues, if I, Indlo~d elects to terminate this Lille, Telrant, within fifteen (15) dlys ·fie{ receiving
~'· nol~ce to terminate, cln elect to pay to Landlord, at the time Tenlnt nil·lies LerKllord of ill election. the difference between
five percent (5%) of the then replacement value of the Premises and the ictcal cost of fistoration; in which case, Landlord shall restore
the Premises. Lendlord shall g,ve Tenant satisfactory evidence that all sums contrilmjtld by Tenant es provided in this Sealion
been expende<l by Landlord in laying the cost of restofatson.
If Landlord ~ to le{minlte this Lease and Tef~ant does nof elect to perform the reslofatson of contribule loward the
¢011 of rastoratmfi Is Ixovided in this Sect·, this Leue shill terminate.
if the axisling laws do nof permit any realoration Is described in this Sect·, eifhe{ Parly can terminate this Lease immediately
by ~B nol~ce to me ether party
14~ if Landlord is requifacl or ~ to reinore the Premises Is provided in this Articte. Lincllord ~'~atl nof be reCluirecI
to mstofe alteratsons ~ by Tenant. Tenant's smprOvements. Tenlnt's Irl~e fixlurK. and Tenant's personIS property, ksch excluGecI
items being the safe reSpOnsibility of Tens· to restore. Without interfering w~th Li~dlord's feslofatlon process, Tenant shall congruence
and allgently prosecute the restoration of such liters,ins and improvements and shatl replace lit trade fixtures, equipment and perlenil
property promp!ly upon delivery of the Premises to Tenant.
14.4. if I.Indlord L~ requireq Or elects to restore the Premises as provided in this Article, Tenant ·hall continue the Opera,On
of its buS·ass on the Promrues, during the restorlt~on period. to the extent reasonably practm from the Standpoint of I~'udent I~Jsines~
manlgement. and to the exlent that il will nix anteflare w~th the reitorat,on Ixocess.
14.5. Tenant shill nix be ant|tied to iny compensation O~ dlm,lges from Lindlof~l Is I resull of shy pert~ll or tlxat deatructm
of the Primsees of kx any mconvemence, loss, or 6arnlge that Tenant may ·cur Is · risult of the realO~at~on proceSs
14.5. in the event mat ether Party elects to terminate th~s Lease under the enabling provisions of this Article, Tenant
shill luffef~er tithe Lendlo~l IIt proceeds from the inlurance pofscm delcribed m Seclmfl 113, excluding proceeds fof Tenant'· trade
14.7. In clse of dellruc,on caused from · risk covered by the tourinca Ixovided in Sect·6 14.1, m shall be no
rant of reductm of rent. In case of 0estruct~on caused from I risk not covered by the inlurance peavaried in Section 14.2, there
shell be an abatement of s~luction of rent, excapl any percentage rent, behveen the dale of destruchon Ind the date of co·plat|on
of IIsIofltion, I)ised oll the extenl to which the destruction interferes with Tenlnt's use of the Premises.
14.8. Tens· waives the prowssons of Civil Code Section 1932(2) Ind Civil Code Section 1933(4) with re~pect to any destructiOn
of the Premises.
15. CONDEMNATION,
15.1. "Condenmat~on" means (I) the exercise of any governmental power, whether by legal procledings of othe{wise, by
~,,-,~emnof and (b) · voluntary Isle of trinefar by Lendlorcl to any condemned, either unclar thrall of cOndm~nat,on of while legal
proceedings tar cantleran·son ·re pending.
15.2. '*Die of liking" mains the date the r~,-,~emnOr hes the sign to possessson of the property being condemned.
15~ ~Aw~d~.me~m~c~mpef~atlOn.sums~of~nythingofv~ue~we{ded~p~id.ofmceivedon·tola~ofperti~c~ndemnat~n~
15.4. "Condemf~"' mains Ira/public o~ quire-public ·uthOrify, Or private COqx)rat~on Oe' individuat, having the power of
155. H, dunng the term of do~ing the period of time between the execution of this Lem and the cite the term commences,
there is any taking by Condeft·mean of II1 of any pert of the lind. building, of mr improvements, Ot which ·re · part of the Premises,
of any interest in the Lease, the nghts and o~iigations of the Part· Ihall be daerminecl pursuant to this Article. 15.6. If the FNsmises are totally taken by condemnm~on, this Lease ·hall terminate On the {late of taking.
15.?. ~ any Ixxllon of the Pramme· is taken by condemnation, this Lelle Ihlll remain in effect, exclpl that Tenant can elect
to le{minate this L_k~__e- if the remithang portion of the Prim·eel is rendarid unlultable kX Tenlnt's continued uee of the Premises.
If Tenant elects to tern·'tale tt,s Lease, Tenant musl exe{cse its right to terminate puracant to this Section by giving nofsce to Landlord
~ thirty (30) days she{ the nature and the extant of the taking heve been finally ~etormmed. if Tarrant elecll to terminate this Lease
Is Ixovided in this Section, Tenant 8·so shall riolily Landlord of the det· of teffnination, which date shah nof be eartim than thirty (30)
deys nor later than ninaty (~0) days after Tenant has rim·lied Lindlore of its election to te{minate. Provided, however, that this Lease
Ihall le{minme On me ~late of taking if the date of taking fatis On I date before the cite of termination Is designlied by Tenant. ff Tenant
does mX Wminme this Lease within the thirty (30) day parsed, ths Lease shell continue in full fat'ca Ind effecl, excepl that Blse Rent
15J. ~thepmkinge{e~ofthePmmisesist~kenbyc~n~lOmn~ti~thisL~a~e~h~mmaininfut~tofce~ndeftect.Pr~vided~
however. that if fifty peacent (50%) of morn of the parking area is teken by condemnatloe~, e~he{ Party Ihall have the elect~on to terminate
if eithe~ Plrty elects to le{mm thin Lease, it mum ta~ninle puraulnt to this Secl~on by giving mice Io the other Plrly within
thirty (30) days W the nature and extent of the taking have teen finally date{mined. The PIny terminating thm lee ·ls~ shall riolily
the ofhe{ Party of the m of terminateart, which date Shell nof be earlier then third/(30) {lays of liter than ninety (~0) dlys after me
temllnitlng Party Ills nolinecI The ofher Party of its election to term,hate ProvSOecl, however. that this Lease Ihatl term·nile on the date
of taking if the i of liking fills on · elate before the date of terminal|on 0ef,~nated m the nof~ce from the terminating Party. ff this
Lelse ~s nix lefminaW:l wimin me thirty (30) day period, it shall contmue in full fOrcl Ind iffect.
if irn/porlmn of the Premmes ~1 liken by condemnation Ind th|s Lease tlffllini in full force Ind efflct. on the ~late of taking
the 81se Refit shill be reduced t}y In Iraaunt thal iS m the same ratio to Base Rent Is the vNue of the e{el of the porlm of The Premises
taken I}ears to the tolal value of the Premises immeOlltely lafore The date of lakerig
159 If. wslhm thirty (30) ~lyS lifer the date that the nature Irld extent of the lak~ng Ire frolily d~e{m,ned. Landlord
Tellint Nt LendlifO I! fts coil will Idd on to the remaining Premises' parking arel Io thlt the iral and the Ipprox~mate layout of
th~Pr~mmes~n(~p~rki~m~wi~s~stanti~ythe~me~terth~dat~Of~k~t~e~N~of~k~ng~~
cc, w~n Jnces the restartion ey and cOmp4~es the restoration within nineS/(90) days after LandtoKI riotHies Tenant. the Lease
shal~c~mm~amfu~ceandewec~w~utanymduc~icnin~aseRen~ceptmea~RmenHxr~duc~mn~pu~m~m 1612.
15.10, ElCh Plrly wlim the pmvtSeons Of Code Of Cewl Procedure Section 1265.120 aliowmg eelher Party to petition the superxx
COu;~ to tarfie t~s I. me in the Mnt Of a pittill akin9 Of the Premises.
15.11, If there is I part~ taking of the Primass and thm Lease remains in full fo~ and effect pursuant to Sachaft 157, Lanelo~
,e i~ col shah R~amp4is~ d nsc~,san/astorstick.
1&12. Rent. ecept lot any I)e~entage rent, shall be abited or reduced dunng the period ham the date Of taking until the
campiNion Of teatoration. but iH mr of)ligltml ol Tenon uMer this La~,e shall amain in full lotre an~ effecl. The Ibatament or
reduction Of rent shah be bid on the etam to which the r~orstion intarleres w~h Ter~'s use of the Pmmm~s.
15.13. The award sham belong tO and be paid to Landlord, except that Tenant shall receive from the award the ~;owing:
A sum afirdN~ to Tormnt*s improvements or alterations made to the Premises by Tenant in accordance with this Lease, whr, h
Termm's improvemere or alterat:Ins Tenam has the right tO remove from the Premises pursuant tO tt~ provrs~ons of this Lease but
alecta net to rmnov~; or, if Tenant elects to remove any such Tenlm'l imlxovements or alterationS, a sum for masonable removal and
Illicition coils net Io excled the market value Of such improwments or alterations.
A sum sttritx~a~ to any excess Of the markel value Of the Premises (exclusive cl Tenam's impn:wme~ or aliarations tar which
Tenantisce~pensmedunde~thisSectm)fortheremalnderOftheta~n~verthepmsentva~ueatthedateOftakingOftheiRent
payable kx the mmainder of the tarm.
A sum attribut~ Io that portia, Of the mrd cor~stiluting severance danmess tar the mton of m Premises.
15.14. The taking Of the Premises or any pad Of the Premises by military or ether public authority shitl constitute a taking Of
I~ Premises by col~ls;,~qation only when the use and occupancy by the taking authority has continued for Io~er than 180 co,secutive
eys. Du, ng me 180 day peiod, all the provisions of this Lelee shill remlin in full fo~ and effect. Provital, however, that rant. excem
fat Ira/percemlge ant. ~ be ebited or reduced during such perkxI of taking baled on the exlm to which the taking interferes
with Tenanrs use Of the Premises. I.~ndlord shall be emitled m whirever Nrd I111y be pak:l for the ule Illd occuplk~q of the Premises
IortheperkXlinveed.
t &IIR3RMENT.
16.1. Tenant shall ne valuntarfiy usign or encumber ita interest in this Leue or in the PremiseL or sublease Ill or any pa~l
Of the Premises. or ale any mhe person or enlity (excepl Tenlnt's authoriz~l mpref, entatives) to ~ccupy or use all or any pan of
IN Premil~, without firsl ofc)lNni~ Landtord's c~sent through strict accordInca with N blowing procedure:
10,1.1. Tenant must first gNe to Landlord a w,tten nilice Of intent tO sublease or u~ign (rarefied tO herein as "Tenlnt's
Niltoe") at least one hunme ~ twenty (120) days prior to the effective date el any propose sublettrig or es~ignmeN. Tenam's Notice
mustceqtamN~of~wing:(~wheherTenan~p~%`~-=JstoIs~gnorsub~st;(~)theidentifyandtradeOfthe~Isalgneeor~ub~eIsee
(elch Of which is raterid tO heroin es the "hn~eree' ') with accompanyin~ financial matemints Ior IxXh the individual hnsleree and
NI iNsiness entities; (iii) I signed sammint from both the Tenam and the ~ Tm stating 811 the tarms end conditions
Of all Iheir Iransactm concerning the Premises; and (iv) in the case Of a sublethnV, a copy Of me ~ subtease.
16.1.2. Tenant must at all limes IxomlXly mify Landlord o4 any c~nge and/or aherit~on Of the items required to be in
Tenant's hkx~ce. Tenant's failure to do so, or any misrepresentation or untruth comained in Tenant's Nilice, by either the Tenant or the
I;m3posed hnsferee, shall constitute a clatlult by Tenira, Ind Landtotal shill hav~ the right to elect to terminate this Lease ~reement.
161.3. After mcmpl Of Tenant'S No~icl, Landlord may, al any tim within ~ (90) days Of slid receipl, clncel this Lelse
lOP/mailing I written cancelstion mice to Tenant. Such cancellltion will become effective thirty (30) days after receipl of said mice
by Tenant.
16.1.4. ~ Llrdord llils to exercise ils right to cancel this Lease wdhin The before-mentioned mflety (90) day period, said
Cancellation right on the part Of the Landlord Shall be mmed waived, but only with respect to the assignment or subliming specified
in Tenant's Notce. Tenam may thereahr Is,qn this Lease or sublet the Premises in accordance with the terms Of Tenant's N<Xce
am:l m mstm Of this Aniclt
Any railW, pMdVe or Iss~nment of this Lelse, or ff Ter~nt is I COqXH'NIOn, Iny trlrlsfef Of this LIIse from Tenlnt by
am'Vet, consolidatKm, rso~anizltion or kluH:lit;On or any change in me Ownership Of or power to vote the majority Of the outmandin9
voting stock Of Tenlnt. Ihlll constitute an Iss;gnment for the purposes of rues section.
Any Iss:Vnment, encum~lnce, or subtaase made wffhout obtainir~ Landtord's cousiN, according to the Facedate described
Ibove, shill be voidable Ind. at Landlord's election, shall constitute I default. Landiord's consent tO Iny assignment, encuml3elnce,
or sublease shill n(X con~itute a further warvat of the provisions of this Section. Landtorcl shall not unreasoaably withhokl COnsent,
t~t riseryes the reVnt tO require Transferes to be as financially stable is TonaN anci fOr Transferee's busmess to be of the same cherlctar
Ind Qullity IS Tenlnt's business and Is the entire Project m general. Tenant agrees to reimburse Landlord tar Landiord's attorneys'
lees incurTed in conluncho~ with the processing and documentat|on of any requested assignmeN of this Lease or subletting of the
Premises. Consent by Landlord to an asS;gnmem or a subletting shall neither release Tenant from its FiNn/liarlily under this Lease
n~' from its of:digltK}ns IS stated in this Article.
162. WittlO~ in lay wly limdlng any other rights availalOe to Landlord it the time Of any proposed IIs~nment, Lindlord
mprlMly resets the nght to Kljust ~ Base Rent Iccordin9 Is any chlnge in the Co~umer Prce IS IS Ipecified in Sicfish 7.2,
whether or nil such an ediustment would othenvme be due It that time.
163 O~e hal! {v~) of any consideration received by Tenam lot either reigning this Lelse or ham antera9 into a sublease
tonitact. IS well IS o~e hilt (~a) Of any continuing rent pa~l tO Tenant from a hnsfeme in eces$ Of the ~lnt Tenlnt w~ o431igited
to ply to LandlOrd It the time of the IM~nment or sublea. IMII be paid to the LandlOrd in CO~ide~atm Ior Landtord's cogent
to any c~nmgnment of subleamg. Tenlm's failwe to pay to Landkxd said required consideration shall cormRule 8 default by Tenant
Mid Landlord shall Mve the right to immediately tlrminitI the Lelse Agreement in Iddition to all olhef timedies.
164. Tee~immedmta~yandirmv~cab~aw~nstoLand~orc~ISsecurity~orTenant~sel~igati~emw~erthi~Lea~e~al~mntfmm
~ny~a.d]~e~ingofaHor~p~r~OfthePremisesISpe~nit~edbythisLaase~IndLanel~rQ~as~signeeandesattomey.in.facttorTee~8nt~
or a mceiv~ kx Tenant apf,~r. ed on Landk~l's a,WUcat~on. may ccioc~ such rant am ~ it toward Tenant's ob, Iatms uocw' this
Lelle. P/twioe(:l, hOwevM, until the occunlflce Of deelult by Tenlnt. Tenlnl Ihall hive the light to coflect luch renL
16.5. N~kemstofTen~n~mthisL~seN`~at~be~ignab~eby~perationOf~w(incfudi~g~with~ut~imitstio~Ntmndorof
~ ~ by totIcy or intoilCy). Elch Of the foE)wing Icta 111111 be conlider~ In invofufitln/assignmeN,
16~.1. ~ 1Mint is or becomes henkrupl or insoh~t, makes an assignmere for the benefit el creditors. or institutes a
proceeding ueder the Bankruplcy Act in which Tenant is the blnkrup(; or, if Tenant is I partnmhip m cormira Of more than one pareart
or ~mity. if any pannor Of the plrtnership or elN~ person or efitity is or m blnkrupl or inletvent, or mikes an eaignment for
IN benefit Of creditors; ·
16,5.2. if a writ Of attachmere or esecution is levied on this Lease;
1653`if~many~x~ceedingoracti~ntowhichTenantisaPany~amisN}~xmtedwimauthorityto~a~epmaeni~n
otthe Pmmises.
An invofunll~/Ilalgnment shall corqstitute a clefsuIt by Tenm and ~ ~1111 lllve the ~ to atec't to ter~inlle this, I.IIN!;
~avmtofa~achmen~orexecutionistaviedonthisLease~Tenantsha~have1~daysmwhichtOinifi~temm~valOf~hemment
~reuecuti~nan<~six(6~mer"hstomm~vethesame`ifanyinvofuntan/~x~ceedingin~ankruptcyis~x~ugNagainstTenam.orifam
is appointed. Tenam Shall have sixty (60) de~ in which to heva the invofuntan/Ixoce~linV dismined or the receiver removed. Landlore
shall have the eplmn tO exland said ttme limitations.
17. DEFAULT.
~7.1. The occuffence Of any of the feesrang shall constitute a default by Tenant:
17.1.1. The tadunt, of Tenant to pay or cause to he paid when Oue any rent. man,as. or chatVia require0 by this Lelse to
be paKI by Tenant:
17.1.2, The abandoftment el the Prermses by Tenant as such term i· defined in the Art;cle Idled "Abanclonment:"
17.13. TeOlnt cauSing or pertaining, vethour ~ wrmen con·aN. el Landlord, any act when this Lease requires LandlOrcl'S
prior written consent or prO~itHts SuCh aCl;
17.1.4. FitIra tO perform any other pmvisK~ el this Lease, ~ the failure tO perb'm is not cured within 30 days afte~ notice
Ms blen given tO TonIn·. ff the clefauK cannot mlsmllbly be cured within 30 cllyl, Teolm shill no( be m default el thrs Lelse if Tenant
c4)e~,,~lnces Io cure the default within the 30 clly petocl anti diligently and m ,_hoOd__ faith COntinues tO cure the default.
Nolices grven uncle this Section shall specify the sieged default and the applicable Lease Wovislons, and shall demand that
Tenant pelfram the WovisiOnS of this Lease or pay the rent that a in arrears. as the case ely be, within the Ipplicable period el tiN,
Of clult the Premises. No such note ShlH be tieseed · k)deifure of I teffninit~o~ of this LaMe unM·s Landlord su elects in the nofte.
17.2. ~ IMII hem the lOllOwing remeclm if TenIn· commits I doflult. These ram·deS Ire not all incluswe; they are
17.2.1.Landk~c~c~nc~NinuethisLe~~~infu~~~~ceandof~ec~~nc~sha~~havetheri~~1oc~~~ectrantwhendue~TheLem
d~c~ntinueinof~ectasinn~asL~ndi~K~d~esnnttorminIte11~Mnt~right1opeseui~n.Duf1ngthepe~1~Tenantisinde(~ult~Landlord
cln ofef the Premises and re~ them, Of any pert el them, tO third Pitties Ior Tenant's account. Tenant Shall be liable ~mmedmtely
tO Landlord Iof all ~ LancRofd incurs in rata·tang the PTemeMe, mclucling. without limifmlort, beokere' commisulons, expenses o(
remode4ing the Premises required by the raM·tin9, and like corn. Rate·tin9 can be for I period shorter or longer than the remaining
from Ira/resorting. No act by Landlord ellowed by this ·ut~plragrap~ shall letre·hate this LaMe unless Landlord ncXifms Tenant that
Landinto ~ 1o term this Lease. Afler Tenant'· clelault, and for as long as Landlord does nGI termirWe Tenan·'· ri~hl to possession
01 the Promise·. if TOfilnl ot~in$ Landlord's cogent, Tenin· Ihatl hive the ngnt tO ii~n or lut)lat its inlet·st in this Laa,,e pursuant
17.2.2. ~ cln tore·nat· Tonant'l righi tO poueSsion et the Prl~nises at any tm~e. No act by landlord mher than
giving nolloe tO Tenant Ihltl tartruants this Lal~e. Acls el maintenlnce, efiof~ 1o rate( the Premises. or the appO, ntmant el a receiver
on Landtord's inltmtive tO peteel Landlord's ~nterest under this Lease shall ncX conmifute a terrainabort el Tenant'· right to posses·ran.
(i) The worth, at the time el the award, el the unpmcl rent that had been earned at the time el terrainalton Of
0i) The worth, at the time of the award, el me Imount by which the unpaid rent that would have been earned
oflm' the date el terminllton el this Lalle until Ihe time el award exceeol the Imoont of the loss of rent that TenIn· prcwes could have
(iii) The wofth, It the t~ma of the Iw, rd, of the amount by which the unpaid rent for the balance of the term after
the time el award exceeds the amount el the Ms· el rent that Tenant proves could have been reasonal~y avoided; and
(iv) Any ether amount. Incl coufi __,:,~__, necessary tO compensate Landlotcl ·of Ill detriment Foxarea·ely caused
by Tenam's clefsuit.
"The worlh, at the time of the Iward;' as used m (i) and (ii) el this subplragraph is to be computeq by allowing interest 81
the rite el 10~ per annum. "The worlh, It the tithe Of Ihe Iwlrd." as referred tO in (iii) of this subparagraph it tO be computed by
discounting the amount at the discount rate el the Federal Reserve Bank ot Ban Francisco at the time of the award, plus 1%.
17.2.3. If TenIn· is m default of this LaMe, Landlord ·hall have the neht tO have l receiver iplx:Hnted tO colaset rent and
conduct Tonint's business. Noifher the filing el · patit;on for the appointment Of I receiver nOr the Ippointmant it·eft Shall constitute
an Nectmn by Landlofcl 1o laminate this Lean.
17.2.4. Lancltofd, at any time altar Tenant commits · clefauIf, can cure Ihe clefsuit It Tenan·'· colts. If at any time, by
el Tonanrs default, Landlofcl pays any sum or does any Ict that requires the payment Of any Sum, the Sum paid by Landlord artIll be
due m from Tenant tO Landlord at the tithe the Sum is paK:l, and if Tof~lt pays Such Sum It · later date. if Shall hear ire··st
at the tie el 10e/o pe annum from the cllte the sum s pNcl by Landlord untd Landlord is rmmbursed by Tenant. The sum, tOga·her
with accrued mterem, shell be eclditional rant.
173. Rent not peld when clue ·hall bear interest at the rats el 10ea pe annum from the date due until paid.
17.4. In the event iny payment el rent requira(I her·by Shall not be paid within Ins (5) cllys Ifter the ·1ms shell be due and
payable, · me charge by way el parnlges shall be immeclmtely due and paylids. Tenant recognizes and icknoMeclees that default
In re·kin9. when C}ue, payments Of rent requlrs(I hereby will result in LandlOrd incurring MlditloMI COltS Ind expenses. Such costs and
expelrues include. but are not limited tO, processing and accounting charges, legal costs, isle charges that may be imposed on Landlord
by the terms of any encumbrance Ind ncXe secured by any encumbrance COvering the Premises. and loss tO LandlOrd of the use of
1hem~neyckae.Tenan~heraby~9ree$that~intheeventel~ny~uch~mp~yment~Land~K~sh~ilbeen1if~ed1oc~am~gestorthedatrimant
clusecl thereby. IN· that It is extremely difficult Ind imprlcticll:de to IlCertein the extent Of such dlmlges. Tenant that·lore agrees
(1)thIta~Itechargeequa~1ofhepe~cent(5h)eleachpaymentelrentth~bec~mesdeiinc~Uentisarea~orab~eeItimateelsaldc~am~ges
Io LardofcI ancl (ii) to pay said Sum on demand.
,a~,~lnce Of Iny a chlree, Of any part Nreof, shall not cooItifute · diver el Tenant'· default with respect to the overdue
· nouN, or prevent Landlord from execism9 any el the mr righ~ and rameclms available tO Landlord. ff rent is not received by the
due dale, Landlord shall ncXify Tenant and Tenant shalt, on demand of Landlord, |romecite·ely cure the {Maul· by presentment o4 rent
17.5 Landlord shadl be in default of this Lease if if fails of reluses tO perform any provision of this Lease that if is obligited
tO patiofro if the litlure 1o peftofi~ is not cure(I within 30 clays of·el ·flatten ncltte of the cisflult Ms been given by Tenant tO Landlord.
if the cletlkdt canna m be cured within 30 days, Lanelord shall nm be in cletlult el this Lalse if Landlord commences
tO Cura IN default within IN 30 clay perloci and diligently end in good fNth continues tO cure the default.
17.6. ff ~ is in cloflult el this Lease, and as a consequence Tenant recovers a money judgment seains1 Landlord, the
juclgnmm shill be sitisfisd o~ly out of the Foceeds el sale receW~ on execution of the juclement end levy IgainIt the ngnt, titM,
imeraatelL~M~m~inthe~rami~es~nc~utelrentor~theinc~mefr~m~uchree~pr~per1yNbyL~nd~rc~or~utelthec~n-
Ndemmnrsceivedbyi~and~edh~mthe~ateof~thmdisp~iti~nof~Ofanypaf1ofLandlord~sright~tif~e~andintereatinme~remim~
Thl obligltlosm et i. lndtoKI Uriclet this Le-__-e do nm ~,~,-ltute personIf oprigltlo~ of Landlord of the individull perlnars,
shamoldms. dim, eli·cars, eraploWs· of agents el Landlord. Tmmnt shal~ Io~ ~ tO Landlofd's iraere in me Leased Premises,
~nc~ton~he~atselLenc~loN~of8atjMact;~nelany~is~)ityinmpectelth:sLeese~endshe~n~tseekrec~ursee9amsttheindivldua~
pannet shareholders, diractoel, officers, employees, of Igents oi Landlorcl of ~qy of their perions· Islets for such satisfaction.
11, ADVERTISING,
111. TonIn· IMII fl~ Iffix any signs. Idvedising placlrcis, names, ansigrim·, tmclemlrks or other descriptive mitefills on any
window or upofi the emeriOr el the Buirding. unless Tenant has received the prfot written N3provat of Landlord as to raze. type, COtor.
incltmn, copy. Mlure Irld ~ qualities of any such prepoM(I miterilia. Te~lnt IMII nol mY, Itom or ·Ill any fflefchlno~e Outside
the dlaned exten(x wds Ind permanent Goo,-,~lys el the PiImses. TenIn· IMII n(X in·till Iny extofior lighling, implihers of Similar
devices, or use m of Ibout the Premises Iny ao'veflising maclie em~'h my be Msrcl Of seen Outside the Premmes, such as ltuhing
lights, searchl:gnts, IOUClS;IIRe, L phonographs Of rldlo IXOaClClStS.
1t, LANDLORD'S ENTRY ON PREMISES.
19.1. Llndlorcl and i15 iuthorized rlFelmltltwe· Ihlll hive the right to eNer the Premmes It III re·so,able timel for any of
19.1.1. To clatormee whether the Prammes Ire in ~ conClifton ancl wheher Tenant ~s comp;ying wnh its obligations under
th~s Lease.
191.2 To make ilterit~OnS. acids·ion· and to clo any necissary mlfnlanlnce ·nd ref)s~rs. Ind tc make any restoration to
WINe)01:t NET ;1~9, 11~6
~lmeW~m. ordu~ngmnyNncxlwt. MTmmmi~indeCauX.
~ ~ M mr ~n ~ mm ~ ~ ~. ~ ~H m~ mmm
dim ~ l) ~ ~ ~ Wn (101 ~y ~ ~11 1 in U~.
WIN(X:FFNET (126)
ot Tenant's personal property Tenant Shill be liable to Llfidlord for landlord 'S cOStS for stofin4j removmg. aM ~$posstTg 04 any alterm~ons
ot Te~ant's personal pt~3eny
If Tenant fads to surfeider the PTem~ses to landlOrd upon exD|rition O~ 10 alys aftof termln/tlon (X the Lease i$ required by
N ArtK:le, Tenant shill hold Landlord harmless from all damages result:rig therefrom, mcluQing, with hiltethan, clt,ms made by I
~_,c~eeding Tenant resultart9 fro~ Tenint's fadure to surrender the Prim:re.
25.2. ~fT~nant~wifh~sc~nsent.rem~in~mp(~e~K)n04~hePmmise~qxratidn(~te~Nn~nof~he~~
the dlte in Iny I',X~ce (]wen by Lendlo~ to Tenant termre·rig this Lelse, such p~___uJsSion by Tenant shill be deemed tO be a month-to-
month In·Icy terrainable on 30 days' netice given It any time by either Party. Duril~ such month-to-mOnth tenancy, Tenant shill pay
al rent required by this Lease. If percentage rent ~s required by the Lease, it shall be paid mO~hly on Of bel(xe the 10 thclly of elch
month. All provisions 04 this Lease except those pertaining to term shall Ipply to the month-to-month tenancy.
25,3. The voluntlry o~ other surTender by Tenlnt (x a mutual cancollation 04 this Lease ·hell n(X work I mMger, and shall, It the
election 04 LandlOrd, either terminate all of any existing subleases of sublenanc~es of may aperIte as an 8qnmem to it O4 any of
IN 04 such subleases of subtanancies. Landlord Ihefl exercise its elichin within thirty (30) clays 04 the event so requiring.
21, ABANDONMENT,
261. Tenant ·hell nil vacale nor abandon the Premises at any time during the term 04 this L,else, my permit the Premises
to remlin unoccupied for I period O4 longer then ten (10) consecutive Clays during the term 04 this Lelse. If Tenant shall iI:)and(x) the
Premi~e$~eny~em~n~mb~lO~ingtoTe~nt~nd~oftonthePrem~e~h~bec~eat~with~dikT~`~4d04~pmvidedinSec~n2~-1.
27, QUIET ENJOYMENT,
27.1. N(Xwithatanding any subordinatidn as I~ovided in the Artcle titled "Offset Statement, Ntomment, Subordinatm." if Tenant
is not in Ix~ach uncIof the covehints made in this Lease, Landlord COvehints that Tenant shall have peaceful and quie enjoyment Of
the Premises without hindersIce on the part O4 landlord. and Landlord will defend Tenant in the peaceful and quiet entoymem Of the
Promises 8gainst cllim· 04 Ill parsons clllm:ng Ihrough of under the Lendkxd.
1t, FORCE MAJEURE.
28.1. Any prevention, defay (y sloppage due m strike·, locko~s, labof disputes, Icts Of God, inability to 04xain labof of materials
ofmas~nabesu~xMutesthem~x~g~vemmenta~re$trictm~regu~at~qs~ofm~enemy(xh~stiieg~vemmenta~act~n~cNi~c~mmotm~
fire of other casualty, and other causes beyond the reasonable control 04 the Party Obl~gIted to pertarm, ·hill excuse the performance
by Iuch Party kx s period equal to that resulting from such DriveNion, 0Nly of stoppage. except m obtigltions 04 Tenant to rake
plymen· tof rental lncI (Xher charges pursuant to the term· (24' thi· Lelse.
2t RELATIONSHIP OF PANTIES,
29.1. The re~mi~nship 04 the Partm hereto is that 04 LendlOrd and Tenant~ ~nd it is expressh/ un4~e~-q~-nd--.--- ~nd aVm~K~ that Lend~rd
is not in any way of fat any I~rpose a partner of Tenant, of · ioint venturer with Tenant in the conduct 04 Tenant's t~jsiness of otherwise.
311. GENERAL PROVLSION$.
30.1. Time ~s 04 the essence 04 each pro~qslon 04 this Lease.
303. If either Parly G a corporitton. that Party shall deliwr to the other Party, o~ execut~o~ O4 this Laasea certif~d copy of
a res04utuo~ 04 its boare of directore authofizm9 the execution 04 this Lease and naming the offcarS that are authorized to e~ecute this
Lease on behalf Of the cOtpo,"attOn.
30.4. This Lelse Shell be binding on and artore to the 13~n04il of the Partial and thmr ·ucc~llofi, Ixcept as provitlvd in ~tctlon
14.1, end all 04 the Part·e· hetefo shell be lathfly and Severlily lllbla for the cavillint· cofillinld herlift.
30.5. Rent and III other sums payable under this Lease must be paid in IIv~ul money 04 the United ,States 04 Amerecl.
30.~ Except as prowdid in the Amcle ,tied "DefaulL' ff a Party elocts to terminate this Lease Is ~ herein, the Parties
M be relelsecI from further habilit~es and o0hgltlona {m the date the Lelse termir4tas. Landlord Ihlit mum to Tenlit any una~rned
rant, 8s long as Tenant is not in default on N clate the Lease terminatas.
30.7. All exhibits referred to are attach~l to this Lelse and inca, fro,·ted by reference he~ein.
30~,. This Lease ·hall be construed and Interprefed in accordance with the laws 04 the Stlte 04 CNif(xnia lid all amendments
thereto which occur ·ubseduant Io the execution of ·hi· Lalse.
30.9. This Lease contains Ill the agreements 04 the Patois, and cannlX be amended or modified except by I written agreement
ligned by Ill 04 N pert|Is to ·hi· Lelse.
30.10. NI proviston$, wh~her Covenants of conditions. on the part Of Tenant Shill be deemed to be bolh coq4nlms and conditto·.
30.11. The definitions contained in this Lelle Shill be ulld to inlerpr~ this Lelse.
30.12. The use 04 the masculine, leminice of neuter genclof and the ·angular of pturel numl3~ shill be deemed to include the
ottwm whenever the context Io r~luires.
30.14. The heldir~s ot titles Io the Articlss Of this Lelse InCl the Ltlse Provislofis Summa~ Ire kx convenmnce only Ind clo
not in 8ny way define, limit ot construe the contents Of such Articles.
30.15. Except ms may otherwise be expreseh/·tied, elch payment muir~l to be made by Tenant shatl be in acldit~on to encl
not in substitution kx other payments to be made by Tenant.
30.16 Tenant's execution Of this Lease is conclitloned upon Lendkxd'· execution on of bekxw the thirtieth (30th) clay f04towing the
EXECUTED as 04 the clay ancl year firm above wTiften, at County, CaMoils.
LANDLORD TENANT TI~ CiTY OF TEIT, CtlLA
By:
~Ww Po11·ck, General Partner
By:
David Dtxon, Ctt~ NInige~
N~ID NNN 1~
ADDENIX)M:I:
JkDDDIDOM TO LBA,SB BY AID BRTIIBB!I
THE CZTT OF TKIIBCUIA~ AS TElANT, AID
IZM!)SOR P~-RANCHO TIF)USTR.T. AL, AS
DATED d'l]Z,Y 18, 1990
In the event that the City of Temecula and Windsor Partners
- Rancho Industrial fail to reach an agreement on the lease
or purchase of buildings C and D, then the City agrees to
pay Windsor Partners, in addition to the base rent, $930.16
par month of occupancy on the 1,057 square feet of office
space in Building A occupied by The City of Temecula.
The City of Temecula agrees to professionally clean said
space in Building A at its sole cost and expense after they
vacate.
SSCITY1 .ADD
Z ·
0
;1
Landlord's Initials
1'21IIRIT '8'
Tenant's !nittals
EXHIBIT "D" RULES AND REGULATIONS
14 TM ~ ~ ~. C~ ~H. ~ ~r ~ ~u~ ~mm~ tO
On Saturday. S,hdeVs. and ~mm hobdays. and on other
~IM~OE~PM.~I~AM N~.zcmmtMPrlmtMs.
!e ~ ~ ~ N ~. m~i Wff~ ~e ~ Wt~t ImPelfly tO
~m I~l ~ ~ e aM turn ~ lit m~ I~ m~ ~r~al ~umpment
m~u~ ~ns ~m mn~ m a ~ ~ ~ Mmt,~ w mar ~de~ m~r than mare
~ ~m ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ N ,~ m ~ t~ ~ wnh any
N ) ~nm~'l e~(e ~1 ~ toni ~ c~an,~ ~ cl~ IN ~ ~hef man
(wm,~ ~l~l S~lt ~ M ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~nlm 't Clm~lMSs and
~e~e m m ~mm~ m ~ ~r ~ C~inl;~l
T~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ TO ~ly ~ W~II~ I the
~ ~ ~O'l ~ ~ ~ I*) ~ ~ m (v) ~ a~,~ ~m~ Of tM,r
~ m m M ~n ~t ~ N ~ ~ ~ lu,W,ng ~ INNI m ~ S~l M DrO~ht
O~ R Iq is/e6
CrFYOFTEMF, CULA
AGENDA I~i~ORT
TRAVEL APPROPRIATIONS FOR
PARKS TO WASHINGTON, D.C.
RONALD
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve participation of Mayor
Ronald J. Parks with the Valley Group for the purpose of traveling to
Washington, D.C. to meet with congressional representatives and other
officials related to economic development and other city-related
business.
BACKGROUND
Mayor Ronald J. Parks has been approached by the Valley Group, which
is a group made up of business and community leaders within the
Moreno Valley, Perris, and Temecula valleys.
The Valley Group is coordinating a Washington, D. C. trip with other
community groups from Corona and Hemet. The group is hoping to
influence and obtain support for relocation of the Los Angeles Space
Systems Division to March Air Force Base in Riverside County. The
attendees will also meet with congressional representatives on other
city- and area-wide concerns.
A tentative list of subjects and programs is attached for your
information, as well as other material that may be of interest to you.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The cost associated with the trip is $1500. Therefore, it is my
recommendation that the City Council approve an amount up to $1500
to cover costs associated with this activity.
JUNE 22, 1990
TO~
VALLEY GROUP MEMBERSHIP
CORONA GROUP PRESIDENT
HEMET GROUP PRESIDENT
CITY MANAGERS
SPECIAL INVIT=D GUESTS
FROM:
SUBJECT
MARION ASHLEY, AL SYKES, JOE KUEBLER
TRIP COORDINATORS
WASHINGTON D.C. TRIP SEPTEMBER 10, 1990
THROUGH SEPTEMBER 15, 1990
Please confirm with Beverly Buckley, (714) 242-7716, if
you are going to participate in this most important trLp
or not.
The group as a whole will leave early Monday morning
September 10th and return Saturday September 15th. ~
!
Approximate airline rates from America West and U.S. Air
(round trap) are as follows~
GRQUp RATES (10 OR MORE).
Non-refundable
NON GROUP.(NO CMA~GES)
$405
(Group must travel together)
9-10 to 9-15 $447
J~UT.~R PRICES .(WITH ~XCHANGES ALLOWED)
Straight (any time) $724
To book and pay for your airline t~ckets please call~
Gail Quirk
Uniglobe Travel
676-0046 or Fax 699-6196
Of course you are all welcome to make your own travel
arrangements.
Page i of 2
VALLEY GROUP WASHINGTON D.C. TRIP
SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 15, 1990
We have hooked rooms for the roup at the Washington
Marriott Hotel which is only ~ blocks from the White
f
House. Room prices are as ollows=
=.
Single Rate .......... $ 165
Dou e Rate ..... 180
Hospitality Suite 250
Friday and Saturday Night Rate - 99 *
Frida & Saturday Night Rates include a free
breakfast'
Please let Beret1 Bucklay know your intentions b~
July 6, 1990. ~so, don't for et to make your axr travel
arrangements directly to Uniglo~e Travel. (Identify
yourself as part of The Valley Group)
Please call if you have any questions.
Page 2 Of 2
VALLEY GaOUP ET AL
WASHINGTON D.C. TRIP
TENTATIVE GROUP SCHEDULE A~D PROGRAM
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 TO FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 14, 1990
~F~TR~R~ ~0. 1990
6m00 P.~. Recap;ion In Bob wolf's suite
J.W. Harriet= Hotel
Dinner at Old Ebbere Grill nenr
out hotel
7,30 A.X. Con%inental breakfame and orientation
mee%ing in Bob wol£'s suite a~ the
J.W. ~IO~ HOTEL
9xOO A.M. ~o 5mO0 P.M. - Regular scheduled
meetingm and visits
7s30 P.M. Nc hos~ dinner in =he "Torpedo Factory"
Res~auran~ at Alexandria, irginla
7:30 A.M. =o Noon - Leave the ho~el tot the
Pentagon tcr a hemted breakfast and
mem~ln with Air Force O~ficers. Ag3nda
=o include Los Angeles Air Force Ba~e
move of "Space Systems Division" to
.M.A.F.B. end Norton A.F.9., M.A.F.B.
groundwater ollution, M.A.F.B. Hus4~m
and onher br~efings am approprtaZe.
lx00'P.H. =o 5800 P.~. - Regular mchedule
meetings end vimi~s.
Wednesda~ evening - On your ow~
Breakfast - On your own
9m00 A.x. to ~m00 P.M. - Regular mchedule~
meetings end visits.
6aOO
Reception f=: all an~endeee and
quests a~ %he Sewall-Belmon~ House ~r
other o~her suitable facility.
PAGE I of 2 ~
VM.,~EY GROU~, ST AL
TENTATIVE GROUP SCXSDU~E AND PROGR.~
'COn~,inued
Page 2 oZ 2
K~eak~aS~ on :your own
day bum ~our {O~ a%l attendsms
lis~u:n home a~ your dis~:e~lon
TENTATIVE LIST OF SUBJECTS AND PROGRAM~
WASHINGTON D.C.
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 10# 1990 TO FRIDAY S=PTEMBZR 14,
1990
·
·
e
INCUD;~G Bp4~?A~T - ONE ~aT,,,F DAy
Boa=wriVht
w SSD - Space S e~ems Division move =o M.A.F.B.
and Nor=on A.~.B.
w Groundwa~er pollu=ion at ~.A.T.B, ,
(G& VeI=} (Ruber~ Parll
* M.A.~.B. MUSeum )
· H.A.F.S. Hospl=al and health services and
o~her subjects
RRIEFING
VALLEY GROUP, ET AL
TZNTAT=VE LOGISTIC2~L SURVEY
WASHINGTON~ D,C, TRI~
MONDAY SEPTEXBZR 10/1990 TO FRIDAY SEPTEIdlSER 14,199)
ALR T~VEL PACKA~
~T~L - J.W. MARRIOTT HOTKL
p~) WOT.F VAT.LaY ~a~U~ B~C~PTION - Upon arrival Monday
evening and Tues morning a~ k~b Wol{'~ oul~e a~
J.W. Marrio= Xo~el.
NO ~T~Nt~.~ - Monday evening dinner at "Old
~r~" De~r Ho~el. Tuesday evening dinner a~ Ebbe~s
"The TOrpedo
Feo=ory" Alexandria, Virginia,
Tr~ - Pen=agon half-de viein
Frida~ his~orica~ bus ~our
Whi~e House tour
Departmen= visit end briefing
8~ ~T~T NR - Marry Saldi~ch - Press En=er$=ise, :
~on~~ Bob Wol~ or assi nee, Consider'inviting
Na==~ 8aldi:c[ =o selec=ed mee=[ngs.
~reno Valley
Tamsouls
COrona
Beaumo~=
Banning
Xeme~
THANK YOU GIFT~ ~ E~P'S
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
MTG:
DEPT:
TITLE:
PLOT PLAN NO. 2
A REVISED PERMIT FOR
COUNTY PLOT PLAN NO. 11222
DEPT HA~T~-
CITY
CITY NGR,
Reu,,,e,.e. ,daMon
That the City Council APPROVE Plot Plan No. 2, a revised permit for County Plot
Plan No. 11222, based on the findings contained in the Staff Report, and subject
to the Conditions of Approval as amended by the Planning Commission on July 16,
1990, and APPROVE Tentative Parcel Map No. 23q30, Revised No 1, based on the
findings contained in the County Staff Report and subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval with the deletion of Road Condition #25.
Project Information
Applicant:
Bedford Properties
Representative:
Greg Erickson
Location:
Southwest corner of Winchester Road and Ynez
Road.
Proposal: 1.
To revise a plot plan for an approved
ql 3,228 square foot commercial project on
~1 acres as follows:
a) An a 12,73~ square foot retail
building.
b) Reconfigure building square
footage with a total net gain in
square footage of 15,9~7 square
feet for a total of ~29,175 square
feet.
c) Request for Special Review of
parking.
To revise the subdivision for the site into
9 commercial lots.
Analysis
On February lq, 1990, the County Planning Commission approved Tentative
Parcel map No. 23~30, Revised No. 1, and adopted a Negative Declaration for the
project. Minutes from that meeting are attached and incorporated herein.
The Temecula Planning Commission, on July 16, 1990, recommended approval of
Plot Plan No. 2 to the Council· Normally, final decisions on plot plans are made
by the Planning Commission or Planning Director; once they receive their
approvals, they are forwarded on to the City Council as "Receive and File" items.
However, in this case, these were some recommended mitigation measures
proposed by the applicant {see letter dated July 16, 1990) at the Planning
Commission meeting which Staff did not have the opportunity to review and
comment on. Consequently, the City Attorney recommended that the Commission
make a recommendation for approval to the Council and that the item be set for
public hearing in order to allow Staff the opportunity to assess the proposed
mitigation measures and report their findings to the Council.
Staff has reviewed the proposed mitigation measures and has determined the
following:
Condition No. 22, of the County Flood Department Conditions letter dated
December 2, 1989, requires that the following improvements be in place and
operational prior to occupancy:
ao
Winchester Road at 1-15 ramp facilities.
Winchester Road at Ynez Road.
Ynez Road at Center driveway.
As there is some question as to the feasibility of this occurring prior to the
proposed opening of the Mervyn's Store, the applicant has requested the
following condition:
a. Replace Condition No. 22 as follows:
"That the developer be allowed to occupy 60% of the leasable
area of the center prior to completion of the Winchester/Ynez
traffic signal and Winchester Road improvements from 1-15 to
Ynez Road. The developer will be responsible for monitoring
intersection traffic levels and pay for traffic directors when
needed at the time of the intersection after opening until the
improvements are completed, so as to keep the same level of
service at the intersection at current operational level."
While Staff is supportive of this proposal, there are some issues which staff
feels need to be addressed and resolved. These are:
Currently, there is adequate daylight to safely control traffic via
the use of traffic directors. However, in a few months, because of
the decreasing duration of daylight hours, it may be hazardous to
attempt to control traffic via this method without some source of
supplemental lighting l if this is feasible).
Also, as the City is located within the Palomar Lighting District,
there may be some concern about the intensity of the supplemental
lighting and its temporary impact on the observatory. If it can be
demonstrated that these concerns can be satisfied, then Staff would
agree to the Condition as proposed. To this end, Staff has added
some wording to require the submittal of a plan to satisfy these
concerns,
In addition to the applicant proposed mitigation measures, the Commission
2
recommended that the following changes be made to the plan:
That the trash enclosure at the north side of Building No. 9
be relocated to the westerly side of the 18 parking stalls north
of the building.
2. That a landscape buffer be added behind Buildings I and 2.
The extension of the parapet wall for Building 2 to screen the
loading and trash areas from view from Apricot Street.
The addition of landscape fingers behind Buildings 11 and 13.
These Conditions have been incorporated into the revised plans dated July
20, 1990, which were distributed to the Council with this agenda packet.
In addition to the request for additional retail space and reconfiguration
of buildings, the applicant has requested a modification of the Parking
Standards under Ordinance #3~8 to reduce the parking requirements from
a ratio of 6.21 per 1,000 square feet of commercial square footage to 5.72
per thousand. The basis for the request was that there are different
parking demands based on whether the use is predominantly daytime or
nighttime; e.g., in this case, the theatre use offsets the parking demand
for the retail commercial uses which typically create the heaviest parking
demand during the daytime hours. Because, in this case, the theatre
would generate a substantial parking demand {627 cars) and that demand
would be created largely during the nighttimes hours and/or weekends, it
is StafPs opinion that the parking reduction from 2,~95 stalls to 2,~08 is
justified based on the evidence presented by the applicant.
R~u,,~.w~nd~tion
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 2, and APPROVE
Plot Plan No. 2 based on the analysis and findings contained in the
Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval as
revised below:
Condition No. 22:
"Developer shall be allowed to occupy 60% of the
leasable area of the center prior to completion of the
WinchesterlYnez traffic signal and Winchester Road
improvements from 1-15 to Ynez Road. As mitigation,
the developer will monitor intersection traffic levels
and pay for traffic directors when needed at the
intersection after opening until the improvements are
completed, so as to keep the same level of service at the
intersection at current operational level."
Additionally applicant shall, prior to occupancy of any
building, submit a plan to the City for review and approval
indicating how they propose to utilize traffic directors under
adverse lighting conditions. Said plan shall also include an
analysis of any proposed supplemental lighting for consisting
with the Palomar Lighting District; and
APPROVE Parcel Map No. 23~30, Revised No. 1, based on the
Findings made in the County Planning Commission, subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval with the deletion of Road Condition
No. 25.
X-,
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANN I NG DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
CASE NO.:
RECONIAENDATION:
JULY 2, 1990 I JULY 16, 1990
PLOT PLAN NO. 2, A REVISED
PERMIT FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 11222,
AMENDED NO. ~
APPROVAL
PROJECT INFORMATION
1. Applicant:
2. Representative:
3. Proposal:
Location:
5. Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Surrounding
Land Uses:
8. Project Statistics:
Bedford Properties
Crag Erickson
Revise an approved 413,228 square foot commercial
project on 41 acres to include:
a) An additional 12,73q square feet retail
b)
c)
building.
Reconfigure building square footages with a
total net gain in square footage of 15,9~7
square feet for a total of 429,175 square feet.
Request for Special Review of parking.
Southwest corner of Winchester Road and Ynez
Road.
C-P-S Scenic Highway Commercial
North:
South:
East:
West:
CPS - Scenic Highway Commercial
MM - Medium Manufacturing
Mostly CPS - Scenic Highway
Commercial
Across Interstate 15 - Commercial
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial Center
Manufacturing
Cardiovascular)
Vacant (Specific
pending )
Interstate 15
(Advanced
Plan submittal
Approved Total
Square Footage:
Proposed Total
Square Footage:
No. of Acres:
No. of Approved
Parking Spaces:
q13,228 sq.ft.
~2g,175 sq.ft.
ql acres
2,511
No. of Proposed
Parking Spaces: 2,qO8
Percent Increase of
Building Square Footage:
No. of Driveways
on Winchester: 0
No. of Driveways
on Ynez: 3
No. of Driveways
on Apricot alignment: 0
ANALYSIS
Project. Des~DtJcm and B~c:karound
On July 2, 1990, the Temecula Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
this proposal and instructed Staff to further explore traffic impacts, landscape
opportunities, and flooding impacts. Those items have received additional review
and associated materials have been attached to this report.
This commercial project was originally approved by Riverside County on November
6, 1989. It consisted of a 413,228 square foot commercial project on a 41 acre site.
The major anchor tenant for the site is a Mervyn's Department Store, which is now
under construction. The project is located at the Southwest corner of Winchester
and Ynez Roads. Three driveways service the center from Ynez Road. The project
has 1-15 frontage, which plays a major role in the project design and marketing
strategy.
The site is currently being graded under permit from Riverside County. The
grading plan is based on the originally approved plot plan. Differences between the
approved plot plan and proposed revised permit do not affect the grading
substantially.
The revised permit application seeks approval for an additional 12.73q square foot
building which the applicant has indicated will be a furniture showroom.
Construction of that building will impact the parking allocation both in terms of
creating additional demand for parking and losing parking spaces to construct the
building. The applicant has requested that the parking allocation be reviewed
pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 3~8 titled "Request for Special Review of
Parking". A Parking analysis is contained in this report as is the justification
provided by the applicant. Additionally, the developer seeks shifts in building
oonfkJurations which adds approximately 3,213 square feet (0.8% increase exclusive
of the furniture showroom )of space to the site. The total proposed increase is 15,9~7
square feet of additional retail area.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
An initial study was conducted for this project end has been attached for review.
Staff identified the following imports as potentially significant:
1. Location of the project within 100 year flood zone boundaries,
2. Traffic impacts associated with the entire development as revised and
expanded.
-2-
Staff concluded that with proper health and safety mitigations, the project was not
likely to create significant or unavoidable impacts. The initial study and Notice of
Determination have been attached which describe potential harmful effects and
mitigation measures. The Planning Staff is recommending adoption of a Negative
Declaration for the project.
BUILDING CONFIGURATION CHANGES
BuildiN No. ts 10 thrmmh 22
This major building segment backs up to Interstate 15 and is comprised primarily of
the Mervynls Department Store, a theatre complex, a supermarket/warehouse store,
a Pier 1 Store and a mix of smaller shops and restaurants. A net gain of 1,280
square feat would be realized in this building grouping if the revised permit
application is approved. The only significant footprint change is the shift in the
theatre building which improves its frontage on Interstate 15. The change in
elevations for building No. 's 10, 11, 17, and 22 have not bean described or depicted
in the application.
Buildinca No. I
This 12,73q square foot building constitutes the bulk of the proposed changes. It
replaces area previously allocated for parking. The architecture is acceptable and
compatible with the rest of the center. The additional square footage constitutes
approximately a q% increase of building area for the project. Staff finds the
proposed increase acceptable and without significant impact. The executive traffic
summary prepared in July, 1990, concluded that approximately 7 peak hour trips
would be added as a result of this building.
BuildiN No.~s 2 throuqh 9
This building grouping lies along Ynez Road. It is comprised of a K-Mart, two
savings and loans, two restaurants (not drive-thru's) and three small commercial
buildings. The approved site plan did have two drive-thru restaurants, but those
ere no longer part of the application. A net gain of 2,:3~; square feat would be
realized for this building grouping if the revised permit is approved. The proposed
increase is not significant. The executive traffic study concludes that this general
increase would result in approximately 8.l~ additional peak hour trips.
BulldiM No. ~s 23 throuah 27
This centrally located building grouping is proposed for a total 39 square foot
reduction in apace. It is comprised of mostly small merchant shops and a Music Plus
audio/vide store. The proposed changes to this section of the site plan are not
significant.
CIRCULATION
Circulation on-sita is adequate. Threa driveways service the project from Ynez
Road. One driveway is right-in, right-out only. The central major driveway has
2 lanes turning in, and 3 lanes turning out, the third most southerly driveway also
has a left turn pocket from Ynez; all controlled through a traffic signal the developer
is required to construct. The traffic signal should provide ample left hand turn
opportunity into the most southerly driveway.
-3-
Two additional traffic signals have been required to be constructed on Winchester
Road prior to the project opening, although not at the developerrs direct expense.
Improvements to both sides of Ynez Road will be constructed at the applicants
expense rather than through the area assessment district.
The traffic study was reviewed and accepted as adequate by the Engineering
Department. Mitigation measures arising from the impacts of this project are
attached in the Conditions of Approval. An executive traffic summary was submitted
July 10, 1990. It concluded that additional proposed building area constituted
negligible peak hour impact. It further pointed out that the study had been
predicated on a total site build-out of approximately 26,000 square feet mere than
now proposed. _
PARKING ANALYSIS
On May Q, 1990, the applicant submitted a Request for Special Review of Parking
(see attached information dated May Q) . Ordinance No. ~ allows for shared use of
facilities when it can reasonably be projected that parking needs will occur at
different times of the day. The theatre use would occur primarily at night and
requires space for 627 cars. 50% of those spaces would be equivalent to 31Q required
~tces, which is the permitted maximum parking reduction allowed by the code. The
furniture store is primarily a day use. As detailed in the request, the parking
reduction appears reasonable.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE SOUTHWEST AREA
C0111UNITY PLAN
The Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP) has been adopted as a policy guide for
land use decisions by the City Council. This project is consistent with the land use
designation suggested by the plan. The project is consistent with the Goals
contained in SWAP, with the exception of Goal E, which suggests that open space be
retained in areas subject to seismic impacts ( liquefaction ) and flooding. The original
Plot Plan No. 11222 has been previously approved, however, end the site is most
appropriately utilized in a commercial capacity given its proximity to major roads and
the freeway. The project is basically consistent with the Scenic Highway policies
mined in SWAP, in terms of design, use, and setbacks.
PROBABLE CONSISTENCY WITH
i HE FUTURe: GEN/:RAL PLAN
Due to the level of consistency that this project maintains with SWAP Goals and
Policies, and based on previous determinations made for Plot Plan No. 11222 by the
County of Riverside, Staff finds that Plot Plan No. 2, a revised permit for Plot Plan
No. 11222, is likely to be consistent with the Cjtyts Future General Plan when it is
miopted by the City of Temecula.
FINDINGS AND SUPPORTING FACTS
The site for the proposed use is suitable in size to accommodate the proposed
project,
-4-
Facts in Support of Findlrm
Adequate area is provided for all proposed structures. Adequate
parking is also provided. Landscaping on site exceeds Ordinance No.
3q8 requirements in terms of required percentages.
The internal circulation/parking plan should not create traffic conflicts
as design provisions include driveways and parking areas in
confomance with adopted City standards. The Special Review of
Parking indicated adequate parking will be provided.
Findinu
The proposed intensity of use will not have a substantial adverse impact on
adjacent properties.
Fects in Support of FindiN;
The proposal is similar in intensity beth to the original plot plan
approval and to surrounding properties. A regional mall is proposed
gross Ynez Road. A q-story manufacturing facility is proposed
immediately to the south.
Adequate area and design features provide for siting of proposed
facilities in terms of landscaping. parking and internal traffic
circulation.
Findino
The project as conditioned will not likely have an adverse impact on traffic
circulation.
Facts in Suplxtt of Findin~
The proposal is a large project conditioned to provide an infrastructure
level commensurate with its size. Winchester, Ynez and Apricot Roads
will all be appropriately improved to avoid adverse impact.
Reference potential off-site circulation impacts and recommended
mitigation measures contained in the Conditions of Approval and noted
above and discussed further in the approved traffic study and
Executive Summary.
The proposed use will not likely generate excessive noise, vibration, or other
disturbance resulting from use of the site,
FEet in Sumxrt of Findin.
The project does not propose any use that would create any extreme
noise or disturbance. The surrounding properties include commercial,
manufacturing, and transportation uses.
-5-
5. Findin~
The project is considered consistent with the current zoning of the subject
site.
Fact in Sumxx't of Findirm
The proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "Allowed" within
the project site's existing CPS (Scenic Highway Commercial) land use
designation.
Findin~
The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment.
Fact in SuNart of Findinu
A Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. Impact mitigation
is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions of Approval.
Findin.
There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the
City's General Plan, once adopted, based on analysis contained in the staff
report.
Fact in Sulxxe't of Find(N;
The project is under construction in an area generally recognized as
commercial property. The project is consistent with the SWAP land use
designation.
FiNtna
There is not a probability of detriment to, or interference with the future
General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the new
General Plan.
Fact In Sumxe't d~ FindiM
The project is in substantial conformance with existing and anticipated
land use and design guidelines and recommendations as discussed in the
project Analysis.
Findirm
The project should not inhibit or restrict future ability to use active or
passive solar energy systems.
Fact in Sumart of Rndin~
Adequate structural exposure exists for passive solar heating and
landscaping, and architectural features are provided for
shading/cooling during summer months.
10. Rndinq
The site of the proposed use is provided adequate access.
Fact in Sumxx-t of Finditto
The project currently proposes three independent driveways accessing
Ynez Road which has been determined to be adequate by the City
Engineer.
11. Rndirm
The lawful conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect
the public health, safety and general welfare.
Fact in Support of Findiem
Ae
The conditions stated in the approval are based on mitigation measures
necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project
as discussed in the above Findings, Facts, body of the Staff Report.
and initial Environmental Study.
12. Rndirm
That findings stated above are supported by minutes. maps, exhibits.
correspondence and environmental documents associated with this project and
herein incorporated' by reference.
Fact in Support d Findir~
Reference the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Initial Study and
Conditions of Approval.
RECOIIAENDATION
Staff, zcc,,,~lends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 2. and APPROVE Plot Plan
No. 2 based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
SJRIks
Att: :!t,~nta:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Initial Study
3. Traffic Study
q. Amended Site Plan
5. Letter dated 7-10-90 from Applicant
6. Hydrolegy Report
-7-
July 16, 1990
VT~ HAND D~.T.IVERY
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
Mr. Gary Thornhill
Director of Planning
CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
PaLM Pla~ PP#2 ~NDED ]1
Dear Gary:
The plot plan will go before the Planning Commission tonight. I
will bring up a Road Department condition requiring that the
Winchester/Ynez signal and Winchester Road from 1-15 to Ynez be
completed prior to occupancy.
We will request this condition to be modified as follows:
"Developer shall be allowed to occupy 60% of the leasable area of
the center prior to completion of the Winchester/Ynez traffic
signal and Winchester Road improvements from 1-15 to Ynez Road.
As mitigation, the developer will monitor intersection traffic
levels and pay for traffic directors when needed at the
intersection after opening until the improvements are completed,
so as to keep the same level of service at the intersection at
current operational level."
There is a traffic report to support the above recommendation.
I have discussed the matter with Dave Dixon and he supports our
proposal. I hope to have staffms support at tonight's hearing.
Sincerely,
Greg~AS~Eri~ck n
so
Area Manager
/dh
Enclosure
cc: Tim Serlet
Bedford Pr~.perties, Inc.
A Diversified Real Estate
Development and
Management Company
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 9016
Temecula, California
92390-0736
28765 Single Oak Drive
Suite 200
Temecula, California
92390
'telephone
714
676-5641
MAP COMPILED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. JANUARY 1982
:%
I'IIINI'
aIq'IIO, XBAIT ICALI: TO 4.1'6 MILil
IIl~!llllll CO UNTV R.ilN6 DIF'AIITMENT
July 23, 1990
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
RECEIVED .jUt 2 3 1990
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Mr. Sam Reed
Planning Department
CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
SUBJECT: PP #2, CITY COUNCIL
Dear Sam:
The Planning Commission made various recommendations in a
resolution to the City Council on July 16th. I've had the site
plan revised to reflect their requests as follows:
o Relocate trash enclosure on Pad 9.
o Added landscape buffer behind Buildings 1 and 2.
o Added screen wall at Building 2. Height matches Mervyn's as
requested by the Council.
o Added landscape fingers behind Buildings 11 and 13.
We are looking forward to the City Council adopting the Planning
Commission's recommendations for approval on July 31st. Mervyn's
will also attend the hearing.
I've enclosed 8 site plans for your distribution and reduction.
Sincerely,
Grego'~A. Erickson
Area Manager
GAE/dh
Enclosures
cc: Gary Thornhill
F ,If,, d l'rnperties, Inc.
.,\ l )ix.,-; ':' '.
- ~f,.d Real Estate
I ',,: v,-l,T,nent and
~ l ~nor .~ m?nt CornFaro,
- ,, ,
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 9016
l'en~ecula, California
92390-0736
28765 Single Oak Drive
Suite 200
Temecula, California
92390
Telephone
714
676-5641
APPROV~.n PP #11222
I~I~VTSI~.D pI~.T~MTT #~- CI~ANG~.
2 86,887
3 7,500
4 4,050
5 3,400
6 3,793
7 7,600
8 2,500
9 6,000
10 10,000
11 52,826
12-16 44,292
17 76,500
18-23/18-22 65,389
24-28/23-27 33.~91
13,812 +13,812
86,479 - 408
7,855 + 355
4,050 -0-
3,400 -0-
4,450 + 657
7,600 -0-
5,000 + 2,500
5,240 - 760
10,020 + 20
52,826 -0-
44,377 + 85
76,186 - 314
66,532 + 1,143
33.~93 - 68
404,028 Sq. ft.
421,050 Sq. ft. +17,022
PARXING RATIO: 6.21/1000
5.72/zooo
Overall increase in area is 4%. Increase is .8% without Building
One. Building One use is home furnishings, requiring 1/750
parking.
Bore:
Building numbers shifted by one digit due to elimination
of a building number on the revised permit.
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
lay 4, 1990
Planning Department
CIT~ OF T~!ECUIA
43172 Business Park Drive
Teaecula, CA 92390
~z R.IVIBBDI!ItIaT CI~l PP #2~ NLLM PIJ, BA
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me this morning. We
have an application and fee paid for Plot Plan e2. However, based
on our conversation, we are now requesting an alternate procJramfor
parking in accordance with Ordinance e348.
The specificpartion of the alternate program is the shared parking
section. Under this section, we can request up to a 50% reduction
in rsquirsments based on night and day uses.
- Nighttime use is a 29,650 sq. ft., 1880 seat cinema requiring
627 cars (1/3 seats).
- Daytime use is a home furnishing retail user (Interior
2urroundings) for 13,812 sq. ft.
- Overall center parking Is 2408 stalls, 2,495 are required.
The canter is 87 cars short or 3.5t overall.
~asedonthe 50% reduction of the cinema requirement to 313.5 cars,
thecenter would exceedtheovsrallparking requiredby226.5 cars.
The 226.5 excess parking figure is computed as follows: SOt
reduction of cinm adds 313.5 cars to the 2,408 spaces provided
to 2,721.5 cars. Subtracting the parking required of 2,495 from
2,721.5 leaves 226.5 excess spaces.
The above shared parking analysis closely matches the parking
assessment provided by Linecart, law & Greenspan ~ngineers dated
lipril 20, 1990. In their report, they determined t hat the shopping
center, with the addition of Building 1, would still have 250
excusparktngstalls.
Be~ord P~pe~es, ~c.
A I~,v~s:-.:ie~ Real E~ate
D~'elopmer.: and
RL-~agemem Company
Mailing Address
P.O. !~x 9016
Teme,-ula. Callfen'trim
28765 Smile Oak Drive
State 200
Teme~.tla. California
92390
'Iel~Fh~:;~
67~.-F,:,41
!tr. San Reed
Planning !)epartmen;c
CX'A' OF
May 4, 1990 - Page 2
Finally, if the total project square footage of 421,050 is compared
to the 2,408 spaces provided, the parking ratio is S.72/1,000.
· ccording to the ULI parking requirements for shopping centers,
projects with 400,000-600,000 square feet require an average of
4.~/1,000. This provides an excess of 513 cars.
I look forward to hearing the results of the staff meeting on
Nay 17, 1990 regarding the project.
Sincerely,
~reaXanager
(4)
Shared Perklq Requireaunts: The Plannlng DIrector
my, upon application by the owner or lessee of any
J~,~pe, kY. authorize shared use of perking
facilities under. tM conditions specified hereIn:
tip to fiftY percent (SOl) of tim required perking
facilities of · use matdared to he Ftmrl
mighttime ese;. am aF to fifty perGet (t3) Of the
kmq.Frimlred perking fKI Ilttee for a use considered to
rlly e nighttim matY he provided b7 the
larktel facilities of I lie Geesidereal to he
primarily · daytime ese; Iwevtded, hoarere that
such Factprice I perking Irrangements She I I be
reject to the ceedltloes set forth tn Paragraphs
l, b end c helen of this subsection.
TIm folioring uses ire t~plcal primarily daytim
mean: hanks, hellmess offices, prefesslonal
offices, medical clinics, Service stores, retat l
stores (vlth Italted ho, rs), menulecturer/wholesale
stores (irlth Italtad heurlJ, grade schools, end
high schools.
The fol Iolrlng ales Ire typlCa I I)rlmerl ly
nighfilm uses: leiltng alle),s, dance he1
theterse restaurants (with !Illted hours), bern,
nightclubs, aodltortuas, end meeting ha1 Is.
uses, such as cherchos, schools and g)anasla or
offices conbleed vtth recreational facilities, lay
IIIov use of shared perking fact Itttes.'
Conditions required for shared larklng are:
e. The hat Idtng or use for vhtch an applt'catton ts
being lade shell be lecat4d vtthtn 150 feet of
the existing off-street perktrig facilitY.
b. SelfIcier ivtdence lhll I be presented to the
Planning Delartaent demonstrating that no
substantial conflict tn the prtnctlal hours or
FarINs of peak and of the structures or
eses for ,hlch tim Jotnt use 11 proposed w111
exist.
c. Parties cancerend In'the use of shared use of
off-street perking facilities shell evidence
agreeBent for such Joint use IW a proper legal
tastrum.t recor~d tn 1M office ¥ CoUnty · tM
Iscorder u~th lao coplea thereof filed wlth the
ktldteg end bfetY Oelartaont.
t
but for Sl~c al lay ev of Parking.
Farking re(lucttons or modifications excee(ltng the
maxtime speclfted In bctton 18.12 (e) (l).
(3) real (4) my M Kented as pert of a review of ·
davelolment plan, plot plan, subdivision,
coMltlonai ell peruIt, public use pemtt, suffice
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING · TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, PARKING
8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE, SUITE 247, SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA 92108, (619) 299-3090
Apd 20, X990
Mr. Greg Erichon
Bedford Properties
P.O. Box 9016
Temecula, CA 92390-0736
PHILIP M. UNSCOTT, P.E
JACK M GREENSPAN. P.E.
WILLIAM A. LAW, P.E.
PAUL W. WILKINSON,
LEON D. WARD, P.E.
DONALD W. BARKER, P.E
Subject: ~alrn P]avn Assessment, Temecula, California
Dear Greg:
Per your request we have prepared the following assessment of the parking needs for the
430,000 square foot Palm Plaza project, located in the southeast quadrant of 1-15/
Winchester Road in Temecula. The project is proposing to provide 2,408 parking spaces.
You indicated that the parking calculations prepared by others for your project did not
lake into account the characteristics of specific project land uses. You are correct in
assuming that theaters complement retail uses, not compound the parking demand, as
outline! below.
SHARED PARKING CONCEPT
A shared use parking demand analysis was performed by time-of-day for weekdays and
Saturday. The shared parking concept considers the fact that in a multiple-use
environment, not all of the land uses experience their peak parking characteristics at the
same time. For example, planned retail uses traditionally have daytime parking peaks,
while theater and restaurant uses generally peak during the evening hours. Rather than
simply adding the peak parking need of each land use, as is usually done in a lypica] code
parking computation, the demand generated by each use has realistic demand pattern
which illustrates the most probable number of parking spaces needed to support the
planned mix of uses throughout the day.
The Urban Land lnstitute's (ULI) Shared Parkjar* hourly demand factors represent a
methodology for determining parking need which takes into account differing demand
patterns as they occur in real operations. The extent of shared parking depends on the
type, size and character of the land uses involved, as well as other factors such as location,
surrounding land uses, social/economic environment, and availability of alternative modes
of ~nation.
*Shared Partial: de Utbe~ Land Institute:, WadtinVon. D.C-, 19e3: p~. 47.
OTHER OFFICES · CObrA MESA' (714) 641-1587 * PASADENA: (213) 681-2629
AN LG2WB COMPANY
Bedford Properties
April 20, 1~0
~ge ~o
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
The shared use concept was incorporated into this analysis but only the theater parking
accumulation percentages have been modified to reflect the results of similar parking
studies undertaken by Linscott, Law & greenspan (LLG). ULI shows that the theaters are
at 70% of the maximum parking demand between 1:00 and 6:00 PM, every day of the
week. This does not seem reasonable and is not supported by local studies.
MIXED-USE CONCEPT
The mixed use parking concept considers the fact that when two or more complimentary
land uses are located close to one another (i.e. within walking distance) they ten to
support one another. Persons patronizing one !and use may also patronize a second out
of convenience without generating any additional parking demand. Consider the example
of a hotel located adjacent to a retail/restaurant development. ULI studies of this
situation show that greater than 75 percent of the hotel guests are likely to patronize the
adjacent retail/restaurant uses during their hotel stay with out creating any additional
parking demand.
The mixed-me parking effects for the Palm Pl.'.~za project are considered to be potentially
significant between the theater or restaurant and the smaller retail shops. However, the
exact magnitude of these effects is hard to determine without very specific and detailed
research. The effects of mixed-use parking demands have not been included in this
analysis with the intention of generating a conservative estimate of the peak parking
demand.
PARKING DEMAlXq2) ANALYSIS
The parking demand analysis is based on the following assumptions:
I) The land uses consist of the uses outlined on the Site Plan prepared by SGPA
dated April 5, 1990.
2) Parking demand was derived using a "shared use" analysis.
The parking demand rates are from ULI and ITE, without adjustment.
4) The accumulation curves are based on data derived by the ULI, however, the
theater accumulation percentages have been modified to better reflect LLG's
experience on similar projects and the specific uses of this project.
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Bedford Properties
. ru
page three
s)
The project will experience a "mixed-use" parking demand to some degree.
However, m~ed-use characteristics were not accounted for in this analysis in order
to obtain a conservative parking demand estimate.
The enclosed Tables 1 and 2 show the gross parking demand for each individual planned
land use for a weekday or Saturday, respectively. The number of spaces shown in the
right-hand column reflects the cumulative parking demand by time-of-day for both
weekdays and Saturdays. Table 3 contains the hourly accumulation percentages used to
calculate peak demand. The following paragraphs summarize the parking demand
characteristics for each of the proposed !and uses on a Saturday, which is the worst case.
Retail Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation for the combined retail uses is estimated to be 1,869
spaces at 2:00 PM. In the evening, the demand l~r the retail uses is expected to drop
significantly. The Saturday demand rate of 5 spaccs/KSF is conservative and ULI indicates
the 4.2. space/KSF would be appropriate. The higher rate used allows for better customer
service during the holiday season.
Financial Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation for this use is estimated to be 31 spaces from 11:00 AM
to 1.'00 PM. The parking generation rate is 2.1 spaces/KSF. Banks and Savings and
Loans are busiest on weekdays, especially Friday. Saturdays traditionally have had a very
low parking demand, but this has been changing recently. Parking accumulation rates are
assumed to be the same as for office uses, since UL] does not specifically identify financial
uses.
Restaurant Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation is projected to be 233 spaces from 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM.
Friday and Saturday nights are typically the busiest. Parking accumulation rates were
taken directly from ULI and have not been modified.
Bedford Properties
Apr~ 20, 1990
page four
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Movie 'l~eater Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation for this use is estimated to be 564 spaces at 9:00 PM.
The parking generation rate of 0.30 space/street is from ULI for both Friday and Saturday.
The other days of the week are lypically much lower. This rate is higher than the rate
derived from parking surveys conducted by LLG over the past ten years. Our studies
show that the "newer generation" of multi-plex theaters have about 60% occupancy due
to the staggering of movie start times and that all of the theaters in the complex are not
full simultaneously or all showing block buster movies.
COMBINED PARKING ACCUMULATION
The total parking accumulation has been calculated by hour of day for Saturday. It is
anticipated that a maximum combined demand of 2,139 spaces will occur at 3:00 PM. The
parking lots will provide 2,408 spaces. The supply will typically exceed the anticipated
demand by over 250 spaces.
We would be pleased to provide you with supf;oning documentation as necessary and call
us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LINSCOTr, LAW & GREENSPAN
Senior Transportation En~nccr
.]PK/pb
~-900392
TABLE 1
MEEKDAY PARKING ACCUHULATION BY HOUR
PROOECTz PALH PLAZA, LL8 CZNENA ACCLJHULATION, 4/19/90, 3929. NK1
USE
SIZE
PARKXN8 RATE
II:I)SS SPACES
FINANCIAL RETAIL RESTAURANT CINEMA
14.69 KSF 373.88 KSF 11.65 KSF 1880 SEATS
4.2/KSF 3.8/KSF 20/KSF 0.3/SEAT
62 SPACES 1421 SPACES 233 SPACES 564 SPACES
HOt jR OF DAY NET SPACES NET SPACES NET SPACES NET SPACES
6~00 A. 2 0 0 0
7~OOAN 12 114 5 0
8:00 AI'I 39 256 12 0
9:00AM 58 597 23 0
lO:OOAlq 62 966 47 0
11:00 ~ 62 1236 70 17
12500 Nn 56 1378 117 17
1500 PM 56 1421 163 23
2:00 PM 60 1378 140 39
3500PPI 58 1350 140 39
4500 PPI 48 1236 117 39
5:00 PH 29 1123 163 73
6:00 P!~ 14 1165 210 203
7500F'I'i 4 1265 233 299
8:00 PM 4 1236 233 412
9:OOPH 2 867 233 508
10:00 PIq 2 455 210 564
I1:00 PPI 0 185 163 344
12:00 rid 0 0 117 305
TOTAL
NET
SPACES
2
131
306
678
1075
1385
1568
1662
1618
1587
1440
1388
1592
1801
1885 ,
$
, 1609
$
1230
| 692
421
1885
2280
PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE:
PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE:
TABLE 2
SATURDAY PARKING ACCUHULATION BY HOUR
PROOECT-' PRLM PLAZA, LLS CINEt'I~ ACCUMULATION, 4/19/90, 392B. NK1
USE
SIZE
PARKIN8 RATE
GROSS SPACES
HDURC)F'iX~Y
6zOO N'I
9:00 N'I
10=00 ~
11=00
12zOO Mn
1:00 PI'I
2:00
4:00 PH
5:00 PI'I
6s00 PI'I
7=00 PH
8=00 PN
9s00 PI'I
10=00 P'I'I
11:00 F~
12=00 ~d
FINANCIAL RETAIL RESTAURANT CINEMA
14.69 KSF 373,88 KSF 11.65 KSF 1880 SEATS
2,1/KSF 5/KSF 20/KSF 0,3/SEAT
31 SPACES 1869 SPACES 255 SPACES 564 SPACES
NET SPACES NET SPACES NET SPACES NET SPACES
0 0 0 0
6 56 5 0
19 187 7 0
25 561 14 0
25 841 19 0
31 1364 25 17
31 1589 70 85
25 1776 105 107
19 1869 105 135
12 1869 105 152
12 1682 105 169
6 1402 140 245
6 1215 210 316
6 1121 221 344
6 1028 25~ 406
0 748 255 564
0 710 221 519
0 243 198 254
0 0 16~ 20~
PARKING NEED NITH SHARED USE:
PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE:
TOTAL
NET
SPACES
0
67
212
599
884
1456
1774
2012
2128
2139 ,
1969
1790
1747
169:~
1675
1545
1450
695
3,66
2697
TABLE 3
m PERCENTAEES
OFF ICE RETA ! L RESTAURANT
LILI LILI tILl tILl ULI ULI
NO NO NO NO NO NO
NKDY BAT I, IKDY SAT W-.DY SAT
3:¢ OX OX OY, OX 0/.
20/. 20X 8X 3X 2X 2X
637. 60X 187. IOX 5X 37.
937. 807. 42X 307. 107. 6X
IOOZ 807. 6BX 457. 20X 87.
100:¢ 1007. 877. 73'/. 307. IOX
90X IOOX 97X 85Z 50:¢ 30X
90X 80Z IOOX 95X 70X 45X
97X bOX 97X 1007. 60X 45X
93X 40X 95X IOOX bOX 45X
77X 40X 87X 90~ 50~, 45X
47Z 20X 79X 75X 70X 60~,
23~, 20:( B2X bSX 90X 90X
7~, 20Z 89X 60X 1007. 95X
7Z 20X 87X 55Z IOOX IOOX
3~( OZ 617. 407. IOOX 1007.
3~, 0~. 32~. 38'/, 90X 95~.
07. OX 13X 13X 707. 857.
OX OX OX OX 50X 70X
CINEHA
LL6 LL6
P:~T
OX
OX
OX
OX
OX
4X
24X
27X
30X
13X
72~
100~
45~
P
31/. 13 '~ 16:32 TO 714 6'76 3385 FROH Hilbur ~th Rs, Ph~, T-52e P,~
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS
2d06 S. 241h STI~FF:T--~.UITE L.2~0, HI IOENIX. AZ, ~5034 · {6~1 275-5'14~. · TELEX b73439
July 3.3, 1990
1~..: PAI~ PLAZA
In response to your recent request, Wilbur Smffh Associates has completed an aueument
of peak-hour traffic conditions in the tmmcdtatc vicinity of Palm Plaza for the following
o 60 percent bm'ld-out of Palm Plaza;
o Projected opening in October,
o Improvement of Ynez Rond to six lanes adjacent to site;
o Existing intersection approach lane con~2uration on Winchester Road
at Ynez Road;
o Existing approach isme con~Suration at the southbound Ynez Road
approach to Winchesxer Road;
o Four-way stop control at Ynez Road/Winchester Road intersection;
o Si2~nHntion of the Winchester Road/I-13 ramp intersections; and
o St~,tlt?~tion of the Main Palm Plaza access driveway intersection with
Ynez Road.
Ai BANY.NY · ALL lANCe.OH · CAIF~'C).FGYPT · CI.U',~FSTON.SC, COLLIMB~A. SC · FALLS CH~H.VA · NC)NG, KONG · HOU~TO N.,X, KNOXVILI E.TN
KUA .A tUMPUI~.MALAYSIA · LEXING I(3N,KY · MIAMI.FL · NEW HAVEN.CT · O~LAN[.)O.FL · PHOENIX.A7 · PiTTSBUitGN.PA · Pi'~VlDI:NCEIfi
r?ALLIGH.NC · RICHIVlOND.VA · IIOSFL iFJl · SAN FRANCISCO.CA e SINGAPORE, TORONTOCANADA · WASHING1ON.DC · WOODBI;qDGF.NJ
The analysis addresses PM peak-hour conditions since this is when projea-related traffic and
non-project (ba~d) traffic arc m $:i~ ~ k~l.. McthocioloZX used in the ana!~
included Highway Capacity Manual methodology for four-way stop conditions and ICU
~-me g~
Fatlmated 1990 PM peak-hour vohnncs with 60 percent project build-out arc depicted in
Figure I. Trsmc forecasts were developed in the following manna:
o Evcnin2 pcak-hour traffic counts taken in latc 198~ wcrc incrcascd by 15 percent
to estimate back{round traffic for October,
o Projea traffic ~eneration and mieZxment assumes:
- 60 percent dcvclopmcnt of Pakn Plaza (approxixnatcly 2j7,{~0 square fcct of
2ross leasable floor arca);
- 15 percent Imss-by Uidic; and
- Same distribution pattern ss in previous Palm Pl_s~ studies.
o BackSround trmdc and new project traffic were combined to arrive at total traffic
volumes at project openi~
It should be noted that the estimated project traffic (at projcct opening) represents a
conservative estimate since the maximum patronage/sales expectations are not typically
achieved at project opening and often take several years to be resli-cd.
Tfm~lc Ammabrsls FireinStants
Anaby2 of the bur-way stop control at the Ynez Road/W'mchester Road
intersection indicated an estimated Level of Service D capacity of approximately
3,0~0 v~hicles per hour and a PM peak service volumc at project opening o[
2
3UL 16 'ge 819:52 TO 714 6?6 3395 FROH Wilbur Smith Re. Phx. T-5'3~ P. B2
ap~,mxlmately 3,220. This would put the peak-hour Level of Service into the E
ranSe of operation.
The ICU analysis of ~e signsli~,ed Winchester Road intersections at the 1-15
access ramps ruulted in borderline Level of Service C/D or better during the
critical PM peak hour.
o The ICU analysis of the signalized Main project access driveway intersection on
Ynez Road indicated Level of Service A operation during the PM peak hour.
Based on the conservative estimate of background and projea-related traffic volumes, the
analysis results indicate less than desirable traffic conditions would be experienced at the
four-way stop controlled Ynez Road/Winchester Road intersection during the critical PM
peak hour. In our jud~ement, the intersection would likely operate at borderline Level of
Service D/E. In any case, less critical AM and Midday peak periods would more than likely
operate at "D' or better.
RecommeWkd Mtt~V.tion
Given the uncertainties regarding the acnud trip generation of the partially completed Palm
Plaza, we would propose the fonowing mitigative actions be taken:
1. Implement all improvements assumed on page one of this analysis.
2. At project opening, carefully monitor traffic operation at the Ynez
Road/Winchester Road intersection during the AM, Midday, and PM peak
periods with the four-way stop control Maintain a traffic control officer on duty
monitoring in the event that traffic operation is determined unacceptable with the
bur-way stop control The monitoring program should be undertaken for at least
3. Based on observations of traffic conditions during the initial monitoring program,
peak periods would be identified in which traffic control officers would be needed
to provide, acceptable operatinS conditions at the intersection. A recommended
program would be provided to the City for approval.
JLIL 1G 'eJe 8t9:53 TO 714 G?G 3385 FROrl Idilbur ~m~th Rs. Phx. T--538 P.~3
4. Periodic monitoring would be continued on a monthly basis until the permanent
tmfBc si2nal is installed at the intcrscction.
The Traffic Control Officer Program would maintain or improve the existing service levels
at the intersection after Palm l'~=,~ opera.
If you have any questions regarding our analysis and/or recommendations, please don't
huitatc to call
SiDcerely~
Robert A. Davis
Senior Transpox',ation Bngineer
RAD/Sn
Attachment
257600
4
.jelJl_ 13 'cJ9 16:35 TO 714 6~ ~ ~ Wilbur Smith A$.Phx, T~ P,~
11~1 los--, ~448- .:: .._,
221~ 987
Figure 1
Estimated 1990 PM Peak Hour Traffic
With 60% Project Build-Out
Palm Plaza
July 10, 1990
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
VTA RAND nRT.TV~.Ry
Mr. Gary Thornhill
Director of Planning
CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
8UB~ECTt PLOT PLAN
Dear Mr. Thornhill:
I would like to respond to the Planning Commission's concerns
raised at the public hearing on July 2, 1990. I felt that there
were three different areas of discussion: design, engineering and
traffic issues. These will be addressed in order. Backup
information, plans and studies are enclosed with this letter.
Please forward this to the Planning Commission.
nesign.*
Building 2 screen wall. We will include a screen wall that
faces toward the future Apricot Street. Please see enclosed
plan.
- Landscape fingers. We will add two fingers behind Buildings
11 and 13. They have been added to the amended #1 Site Plan.
Landscape theme, Plans, canopy trees, shrubs and grass make
up the street scape theme. I enclosed a small rendering of
a section along that road to provide the Commission with a
clear picture. There is an enclosed rendering for reference.
Building area. The site plan is revised from our previous
exhibit. The plan increases the area by 31 square feet.
Please refer to the Plot Plan #2, amended #1 Site Plan
enclosure.
e~_aineer4nqt
- HTdraulic/hydrolog~ study. A study was prepared by J.F.
Davidson dated April 1990 and approved by the Riverside County
Bedford Properties, Inc. Mailing Address 2878 Single Oak Drive Telephone
A Diversified Real Estate P.O. Box 9016 Suite 200
Development and Temecula, California Temecula, California 676-5641
Management Company 92390-0736 92390
Nr. Gary Thornhill
Director of Planning
CITY OF TENECULA
auly 10, 1990 - Page 2
Flood Control District. The recommendations of the study were
incorporated into our grading and improvement plans and later
approved by the District. A copy of the report is enclosed.
Traffic2
Mello P~os District, The District has been formed.
Currently, the City of Temecula is requesting proposals from
engineers for design services. The bonds should sell in
September 1990. Construction could start on Apricot in
approximately 15-18 months.
Dedication of land for Apricot. The City Council has
designated Apricot a regional benefit for the City of
Temecula. Therefore, the CSty Council has determined right-
of-way should be acquired by the District.
apri~t tlignment. The alignment plan is included as an
Exhibit. Adequate land is set aside to accommodate the right-
of-way. ACSts plot plan (PP #1) also reflects this alignment.
The same engineer is handling both projects.
Traffic study. Wilbur Smith & Associates performed the
traffic study in July 1989. Subsequent to that study, various
other focused studies were done. There is also an executive
summary to address the Commissions comments included as an
Exhibit.
- aegicnal improvements. The site in the planning process set
aside land for Apricot, loop ramp and Ynez Road to 134 ROW.
The traffic study had the following findings:
o
Project size in the study in July 1989 was 455,230 sq.
ft. This is over 5% larger than now proposed, therefore
covering our requested increase in area. This provides
a favorable margin of error. The Executive Summary and
a previous update reflects 3 (not'4) driveways.
A specific studyaddressed the left turn in movement (no
left out) at the south intersection and determined the
movement to be safe due to gaps caused by spacing of
traffic signals.
!~. ~ry ~hoz~d~ill
Director of Planning
CITY OF TENECUL&
July 10, 1990 - Page 3
o
Apricot overcrossing intercepts Ynez approximately 1/4
mile south of the main entrance signal. This spacing is
generally acceptable for signalized intersections.
Growth. The traffic study addressed the development of
the Temecula Regional Center, various other projects and
long range growth forecast. These projections were used
to determine future needs.
Service levels. The project with mitigation provides
service levels of "C" or better at opening in 1990-1991.
This is within the acceptable range. The project with
the required'road improvements will improve service
levels over the existing construction conditions due to
the extensive mitigations. The 1-15 Winchester
overcrossing will operate at service level "D". The
overcrossing would function at service level "D" with or
without Palm Plaza.
Apricot timing. The Mello Roos District timing is
starting construction in 15-18 months. The District,
including acquisition and construction, is being
administered by the City. The Kunzman study performed
for the Cityand the Mello Roos District early this year
concluded that the Apricot overcrossing would not be
needed until 1993-1995. Apricot is not a condition of
this project. We feel that rising a 13,000 sq. ft.
building to this citywide regional improvement that is
already in process may be an unreasonable condition to
impose.
Traffic mitigation. The improvements include both sides
of Ynez Road to the-full 134 ROW, a traffic signal at
main entrance and signals at the freeway overcrossing.
Approvals and permits have been obtained for Winchester
Road and Winchester/Ynez signals. Bedford's cost is
approximately $1.3M to provide this infrastructure. The
property also provides funding for various traffic
improvements through Assessment District #161 and the
Mello Roos District 88-12. These improvements exceed
minimum requirements for the project plus existing
conditions.
Mr. Gary Thornhi11
Director of Planning
CITY OFTEMECULA
July 10, 1990 - Page 4
I trust that I have addressed the issues to your satisfaction. The
proposed building and minor square footage adjustment increases the
total square footage by only 4%. The traffic study covers this
building increase plus an additional 25,000 sq. ft.' This is a
service level "D" area per SWAP that will function at service level
"C" with improvements except for the overcrossing. The traffic
study fits with and has been coordinated with the property directly
east.
We strongly feel that approval of this building will benefit the
City through increased revenue without having a detrimental impact.
I strongly urge the Planning Co!ission to approve Plot Plan #2 as
requested at the hearing scheduled for July 16, 1990.
Sincerely,
eeaganAa&eErricks°n
Enclosures
cc: Sam Reed
JUly 5, 1990
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
VTA MaMrs D~T.TV~.Ry
Nr. Dave Dixon
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
SUBSlOT: PaLM PLaJA SHOPPING CENTER
Dear Mr. Dixon:
We are developing the 421,050 sq. ft. Palm Plaza Shopping Center
located at Winchester/Ynez Roads here in the City of Temecula. The
center is under construction and scheduled to open in mid-October.
We are anchored by Mervyn*s and they have a fixed opening date of
October 19th. We are concerned that not all of the off site
improvement requirements imposed by the County of Riverside as a
condition of occupancy will be complete by Mervyn*s scheduled
opening. The following is a list of off site requirements and
their status:
Tries load: Both sides along the project frontage will be
developed to a 134' ROW prior to occupancy. This is nowunder
construction. Funding by Bedford Properties.
Project entrance signal on Ynes: This will start in early
August and will be completed prior to project opening.
Funding by Bedford Properties.
Winchester overcrossing signals: Bedford is providing funding
and constructing the signals on the overcrossing. This work
will start by July 20th and will be completed prior to
- Winohester/Ynes traffic signal: This improvement is funded
by CountyTraffic Mitigation Funds. Plans have been approved
by beth Caltrans and the County. The County is now going
through the public bid and award process. We estimate
construction on the signal will start in late September or
early October along with the associated widening Winchester
Road. The completion of this off site improvement prior to
Mervyn*s occupancy is our concern.
~edford Properties, Inc.
~. Diversified Real Estate
Development and
Management Company
Mail~g Address
P.O- Box 9016
Temecula, California
9239O-O736
28765 Single Oak Drive
Suite 200
Temecula, California
9~90
Telephone
714
676-5641
Nr. Dave Dixon
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
July 5, 1990 - Page 2
Bedford Properties will complete the improvements that are in our
control. The process of approval for the Winchester/Ynez signal
and associated street plans with Caltrans and the County has been
time consuming, causing a potential delay of completion 60 days
after Mervynes occupies.
However, we have realized the potential delay and have taken
various steps to accelerate the process. This problem has been
discussed with Tim Serlet. The steps include: 1) paid for the
design of the signal at Winchester/Ynez ahead of the County; 2)
ordered long lead time signal equipment for the County, which will
arrive in early August to a preclude future material availability
delay7 3) took a very active role in processing plans for
approval.
Mervyn*s will generate approximately $10M in taxable sales between
their October opening date and Christmas. If Mervynts cannot open
this October, they will have to delay their opening until March.
This delay would provide a needless loss of revenue to the City of
Temecula.
The traffic engineer for the project feels that occupancy can be
accommodated and still be within acceptable standards. I will
provide you with his written comments early next week.
Mervynts and Bedford are requestingthatthe condition to have the
signal and associated Winchester Road work at Winchester/Ynez
complete prior to occupancy be modified to allow occupancy. We
estimatethatthe improvements should be complete 60-75 days after
Mervynes occupancy. Please let me know when you are available to
discuss how to accomplish this.
Sincerely,
Gregory A, Brickson
Area Manager
CC:
Lana Milligan, Mervynts
Tim Serlet, Planning Department, City of Temecula
Lisa Peterson, Bedford Properties
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLOT PLAN NO. 2
(REVISED PERMIT FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 11222, AMENDED NO. ~)
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL DATE:
EXPIRATION DATE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This approval shall be used within two 12) years of the original County
approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect
whatsoever. By this approval within the two (2) year period which is
thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
o
The development of the promises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 2, or as amended by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null end void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded end directed so as not to shine direally
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way, end shall comply with
Ordinance No. 655.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with epproved landscape,
irrigation end shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler syatom shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
emintsined in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exist driveway shall not be pemitted to grow higher than thirty (3)
inches.
Prior to the issuance of building permits. a phasing plan for the shopping
center must be submitted and approved to coincide with the approved
landscape plan.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall
submit seven (7} copies of an 18.12 perking, landscaping, shading and
irrigation plot plan to the Planning Department end shall be accompanied by
· filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 3~8.
A minimum of 2583 perking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3q8. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to · minimum depth of three (3)
inches on four (q) inches of Class II base.
-2-
A minimum of 25 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
the approved plot plan. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped
shell be identified by a permanently affixed raflectorized sign constructed of
porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol
of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area
and shall be centered at the interior end of the perking space at a minimum of
height of 80 inches from the bettom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in 8 conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17
inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than one ( 1 ) inch in height,
which clearly and conspicuously states the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons my be towed
away at owner:s expense. Towed vehicles my be reclaimed at
or by telephoning ."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue
paint of at least three (3) square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of s building permit, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of
the Department of Building end Safety.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Eighteen (18) trash enclosures which are adequate to enclose s total of 18 bins
shell be located within the project, and shall be constructed prior to the
issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shell be six feet in height and
shell be made with masonry block and a gate which screens the bins from
external view. (Amended per Director's Hearing on 11/6/89)
Landscape screening shell be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height
of six (6) feet.
Landscaping plans shell incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees
along the freeways, streets, and within the perking areas.
This project site is within s significant groundshaking zone. Mitigation shall
be the application of the proper Uniform Building Code standards in the
development of this project.
18,
20,
21.
This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of
any building pemit by the Riverside County Department of Building and
Safety, · California Licensed Structural Engineer ·hall certify that the
intended structure or building is safe end atructur·lly integrated. This
certification ·hell be based upon, but not limited to, the ·its specific seismic,
geologic and geotechnical conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure
development is determined to exist, epproprlate mitigation measures must be
demonstrated.
Twelve Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations to
facilitate bicycle access to the project are.
Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to
be dstemined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of plantings, walls end fences in accordance with the epproved
plan, and adequate mintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with
the Director of Building end Safety.
Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, ell required landscape planting and
irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of building end Safety. The plants shall be healthy end free of
weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
end in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, ·hall be installed
underground.
Prior to the sale of any structure as ·hewn on Plot Plan No. 2, · lend division
· hall be recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. ~60 and
any other pertinent ordinance.
For use on projects located outside SKR study ares which contain occupied
SKR Habitat:
Prior
eo
to the issuance of a grading or building permit:
The Secretary of the Interior must have epproved the Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan end any proposed taking
of the SKR must be in compliance with the epproved Plan:
The Secretary of the Interior must have issued to the County,
the Section 10( a ) Permit required by the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 end said Pemit must be in effect: end
Co
A report, prepared by a biologist pemitted by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to trap the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat for scientific
purposes, documenting the amount end quality of occupied
Stephens' Kengarco Rat Habitat subject to disturbance or
destruction must have been submitted to epproved by the
Planning Director.
Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate
fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by
the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot plan,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
ataexhrds:
3e
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance No. 5q6.
2q.
The existing water system per water improvement plan approved for Plot Plan
No. 11222 will provide sufficient fire protection for the proposed project.
25.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow
flow 1500 Glum or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within S0 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building(s) will
be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the
building plans.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Cede.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building ( s ) must be are separated into
square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per Section
505 (a) of the Uniform Building Code.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
29. Certain designated oreas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
· certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $al13.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
Prior to the Issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum
of $.25 per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount
BUSt be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning
and Engineering staff.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
The Environrental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan No. 2 end has no
abjections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. Prior to
building plan submittal, the following items will be requested:
ellViII-serve" letters from the water and sewering agencies.
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted,
including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in
order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities
Law.
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
This is a proposal to construct a shopping center in Rancho California between Ynez
Road and the freeway south of Winchester Road.
The site is on relatively flat terrain between Santa Gertrudis Creek to the north and
a large unnamed wash to the south. Santa Gertrudis Creek is contained by newly
cBnstructed facilities. The unnamed wash has capacity for perhaps a third of its 100
year peak flow rate of 1259 cfs. The reinforced concrete box where the wash crosses
North General Kearny Road is undersized. Large amounts of runoff from this wash
will spill over onto an open field to the northeast of the subject property and join
with runoff from a local watershed of 300 acres. These combined flows sheet across
Ynez Road onto the subject property. Water ponds on the property as it seeks
enough energy to pass through an existing 7: wide x 3: high reinforced concrete box
beneth Interstate 15. As the pond gets higher, some flow will outlet in a CelTtans
interceptor channel toward more freeway culverts to the south.
This project proposes to intercept the sheet flows with a temporary offsite along the
east side of Ynez Road and carry them to the box culvert under Ynez Road to the
channd along the south side of this project.
The applicant indicates that the ponding elevation upstree of the freeway is 10~3.7,
and their project would not decrease the existing pond volume and that all new
buildings would be flood proofed to at least that elevation.
The County Board of Supervisors has adopted the Murrleta CreeklTemecula Valley
Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of collecting drainage fees. Those fees are used
to construct needed flood control facilities within the particular ·re·. The Area
Drainage Plan fees apply to new land divisions and other types of development.
Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff. These increases are
particularly troublesome in those watersheds where an Area Drainage Plan has been
adopted. In order to mitigate the downstream impacts brought about by increased
runoff, the District ,ecc,,,,~nds that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans and Public
Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation charge. Mitigation charges, where
appropriate, will be similar to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate.
Following are the Diatrict's ,.ec~,,l~endations:
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the ·tee of new development. The
new development in this case includes a total of ~ acres. At the current fee
me of $1,970.00 per acre, the mitigation charge equals $86,680.00. The
c~arge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The preservation of the 10~3.7 pond elevation should be proven with
appropriate hydraulic and topographic information.
The p, op~ssJ interim channel on the east side of Ynez Road should be
umatructed with the first phase of this project. The channel should have
capacity to carry the storm runoff from the 300 acres. The 8~0 cfs breakout
should ·leo be carried unless upstream facilities have been ·pproved.
Maintenance should be provided.
The RCB under Ynez Road and the channel along the south boundary of the
project should have capacity to carry the 100 year peak runoff from its
tributary area with full development assumed. If they do not have capacity
they should be enlarged or other measures should be taken.
The onsite channel should be constructed to District standards including
those relating to design, alignment and access. If the District is to maintain
the channel, the applicant will have to pay · maintenance charge.
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be
exmtained within drainage easements. Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions.
Off·its drainage facilitiea should be located within publicly dedicated drainage
easements obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should
be recorded and · copy submitted to the District prior to the issuance of
permits.
-7-
A copy of the improvement plans and grading plans along with supporting
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submittad to the District for
review and approval to the issuance of grading or building permits.
COUNTY GEOLOGIST
We have revleeed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Preliminary
Geotechnical Investigation, ql + Acre winchester Plaza Shopping Center, SWC of
inchester Road. and Ynez R~d. Temecula, CA," dated April 14, 1989, and your
response latter, dated. August 10, 1989.
Your report determined that:
There is a moderate liquefaction potential at the site for soils at depths
between 20 and/t0 feet.
Approximately I to 3 inches of liquefaction-induced settlement might occur at
the subject site.
Your report, ~.oeme(,nded that:
To mitigate the liquefaction potential of the site. the near-surface soils within
prr, ex~s,d building areas should be rernovad to a minimum depth of 5 feet below
the existing ground surface or ~ feet below the deepost footing. whichever is
greater. Deepor localized removals to competent soils should be anticipated.
Overexcavations should extend a minimum lateral distsnca of 5 feet beyond the
outer edges of exterior footings.
Prior to fill placement. the exposed soils should be scarifiad to a depth of 6 to
8 in and compacted to a minimum of 90~ relative compaction (ASTM D 1557).
A 1-foot layer of gravel (1-1/2 in maximum size) should then be placed in the
bottom of the excavations and compacted to at lest 90~ relative compaction
ASTM D 1557 ).
To mitigate the potential effects of liquefaction, continuous footings should be
used for all Pe~l~seJ structures. Square footings may be considered but
should be constructed as a combined or continuous footing. Two #4
reinforcing bars placed in the top and 2 in the botten of the continuous
footings ere r;u,,,,~ended to provide uniform support of the foundation
system. A Structural Engineer should evaluate configurations and
reinforcement refiuirements for combined footings, structural loads.
shrinkage and temperature stresses, with special consideration given to the
possible effects of liquefaction.
The design structures should comply with the requirements of the governing
jurisdictions and standard practices of the Structural Engineers Association
of California.
-I-
Foundation and grading plans should be reviewed by the Geotechnlcal
Engineer to assure conformance with the intentions of the, ;cc-,,,~ndations
umtained in this report.
It is our spinion that the report was prepared in a competent runner and satisfies
the additional information requested under the California Environrental Quality Act
review and the Riverside County Cemprehensive General Plan. Final approval of the
rqart is hereby given.
The, ~.c,,..~!~lstions made in your report for mitigation of liquefaction potential shall
be adhered to in the design and construction of this project.
It should be noted that the r, ce.,,,~ndations for liquefaction mitigation made in this
report supersede those made in County Geologic Report q18. prepared by Leighton
and Associates on ~ 16. 1985.
ENGINEERINC DEPARTMENT
DRAINAGE
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the, u.c,,,hcndations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
The Development shell accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage
flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the
use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of
Ordinance No. q60 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage pu, isles, the
shall provide adequate facilities as approvad by Engineering Department.
All lots shall drain tmeard the street unless otherwise approvad by the City
Engineer.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shell be diverted
through undersidewalk drains.
A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to the City
Engine for review and approval. The study shall be prepsreel by m
Registered Civil Engineer end shall Include existing interim and prqasad
editlets, including Hydrology and Hydraulic Calculations.
GRADING
Pr;or to the issuance of a grading permit. the developer shall submit four ( ~ )
espies of · soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall
address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit. the developer shall submit four (~)
copies of · comprehensive grading plan to Engineering Department. The plan
shell camply with the Unlf~rm Building Code. Chapter 70. and as my be
additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. The plan shell be
-9-
drawn on 2q" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer.
,/
A grading pemit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City mintsined road right-of-
way.
The developer shall provide bonds and agreements, clearances from all
applicable agencies, and pay all fees prior to the approval of the plans.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments, including median cuts.
Street improvements for Winchester Road and Ynez Road shall be completed
prior to issuance of certificates ~n~. /~ e
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
Prior to the issuance of building permits the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum based on the current fee schedule as
mitigation for traffic signal impact.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
Backaround
1. less of Proponent:
R~dfnrd DPv~looment
Address and Phone
lumber of Proponent:
P.O. Box 9016. Temecula, CA 92390
(714) 676-5641
Date of Envjzosental
Assessant:
May 8, 1990
4. Agencx Xequ.i:~g
~ssessssnt:
Nmmof~l,
ff applicable:
Palm Plaza P.P. Revision
6. Locstton ofProposal:
Southwest corner of Winchester
and Ynez
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets.)
Yes
1. Earth. Will the propoul result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
be
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
Substantial change in tq~grsphy
or ground surface relief features?
de
The destruction, covering or modi-
timion of any unique geologic or
physical features?
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erasion of soils, either on or
or off site?
Maybe
No
X
X
X
BLANKIF, S/FORMS -1-
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltat·on, deposition or erosion
which my modify the channel of
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any biiy, inlet or lake!
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslid·s,
ground failure, or similar hazards!
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Cii
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
be
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
me and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
de
Change in the 8mount of surface
water in any water body?
e$
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
er turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or me
of flow of ground waters?
Maybe N_9
.X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANKIESIFORMS -2-
go
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an equifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishant of existing
q=eciei?
de
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish end shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
be
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Ye__~s
X
Maybe N._~o
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANKIF, S/FORMS -3-
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light sad Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned lead use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial deplation of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pearecedes,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
sacy response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan~
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth me of the human population of
sa area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
i,. {,potel result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement!
Ye.S
.Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANK IF, S/FORMS -~-
Effects on existing parkin9 facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d, Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
end/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, reil or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial affect upon, or result in a
need for new or sitered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
e. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Perks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
Energy. Will the ~oroposel result in:
e. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b. Substantial increJse in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
eourct~ of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
· need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANKIESIFORMS -5-
b. C4xamunlcations systems!
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
suit in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
rental health ) ?
be
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20, Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
be
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic offms to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
[lees the proposal have the potential
te cause m physical change which
mid affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
de
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANKIES/FORMS -6-
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of m fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
be
Does the project have the potential
to Khieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of tim while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future, )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
impoct on two or more separate
resources may be relatively
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Ye_,~s
,Maybe
No
X
X
BLANKIESIFORMS -7-
III Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
BLANKIESIFORMS -8-
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and · NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have · signi-
ticant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ticant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED,
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
Date
6-11-90
Samue] Reed
For
CITY OF TEMECULA
BLANKIESIFORMS -9-
1 .s. -f.
legs
Air
2.a.-c.
liter
3.a.
3.b.-c.
3.d. -e.
3.f.
No. the proposed addition of a 13,812 square foot building and 2,8q8
square feat of additional floor space will not involve significant
additional amounts of grading to approved Plot Plan No. 11222.
No. The project site is identified on the Riverside County General Plan
Seismic Geological Map as being located within a fault zone, liquefaction
or subsidence area, and appropriate building design will be required
to mitigate potential impacts.
No. The additional square footage of commercial space adds
incrementally to the deterioration of air quality locally and regionally.
Temecula's rate of growth regionally is significant. This individual
project's impact is not significant.
No. There ere no marine or fresh waters on the site.
No. Sheet flow will continue to be channeled into the streats and
drainage facilities. Development activities on open land generally
decreases water absorption by the installation of concrete structures.
Construction activities also compact soil which effects absorbability.
This impact is not deemed significant and will not be increased if the
revised permit application is approved.
The closest intermittent body of water to the site is Tucalots Creak.
The proposed project will not effect the amount of Tucalots Creak's
surface water or alter the surface water quality.
Yes. See Flood Control letter dated June 18, 1990. Conditions to avoid
significant impact have been attached.
No. The proposed project is an amendment to the approved Plot Plan
No. 11222 and would not edditic~nally effect the quality of flow of ground
waters.
No. The proposed project will not affect the public water supply.
Yes. See Flood Control letter dated June 18, 1990. The project site is
located within a dim inundation area end is subject to 100 year storm
flow. Development on the site is subject to the land use standards for
floods implemented through the Riverside County Ordinance No. q58 -
Flood Plan Management. See Flood Control latter dated June 18, 1990.
Mitigations will prevent significant impact.
Pbnt Life
ll..a.-c.
No. The proposed project is to add additional square footage to an
already approvad Plot Plan No, 11222. The proposed project will not
additionally effect the existing plant life.
No. There are no agricultural crops on the site to be affected.
Animal Life
No. Since the proposed project is an amendment to an approved Plot
Plan No, 11222, there will be not additional impacts to animal life,
.a6
Maybe. the proposed additional commercial space may increase traffic
volumes to the site during certain times of the day resulting in possible
increased traffic noise, This potential impact is not considered
significant,
No. The proposed project will not expose people to severe noise levels.
No. The proposed project will not produce additional substantial light
glare as will already be produced by Plot Plan No. 11222. The project
site is located within the Mr. Palmar Observatory Street Lighting
Building Area which recommends the use of low pressure sodium vapor
(LPSV) light to avoid interference with the Mr, Palmar Observatory
Land Use
No. The southwest Area Plan designates the site as commercial, Plot
Plan No, 11222 has previously been approvad for this site.
Natural Resources
No. The proposed 13,000 square foot commercial building will not
substantially increase the rate of use or cleplation of any natural
resource.
li~k d UDeet
lO.a.
No. The proposed project will nat require the closure of any hazardous
substances.
r-. lO.b. No. The proposal will not involve the closure of any streets.
-3-
No. The addition of 13,000 square feat will not allow the location.
distribution, density, or growth rate of human population within the
area.
12.
No. The addition of 13,000 square feat of commercial space will not
create a significant number of jobs which would affect the area's
housing demand.
TrensmrtmtlenlCirculmtlen
13.a.,
c.,f.
Maybe. There may be an increase in traffic during peak hours. The
transportation related conditions of approval for Plot Plan No. 11222
shall apply.
13.b.
No. Approved Plot Plan No. 11222 provides 2,N)8 stalls. By allowing
a shared parking reduction, due to the nighttime use of the theater and
daytime use of the retail store, Palm Plaza will have adequate perking.
13.d. -e.
No. The proposed additional commercial space will not alter the present
patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. There are
not waterberne or rail facilities within the vicinity of the project.
Public Services
No. The proposed addition of 13,000 square feat of cc,,,,,e~cial space
will nat generate a need for additional public services.
15 .a. -b.
No. The proposed project will not result in the substantial use or
increase a and of fuel or energy.
16.l.-f.
No. The proposed project will not generate a need for additional
utilities.
17.a.-b.
No. the proposed 13,000 square feat of commercial space will not create
· health hazard or increase human exposure to hazardous materials.
No. The proposed will not present an impact to any scenic vistas.
Itenlatbn
No. The proposed project will not affect the ·rea's recreational
opportunities.
Culttrd Resources
2O.·.-d.
No. All cultural resource impacts will be eddreased by Plot Plan No.
11222.
Maablm~ Findines of SIQnificance
21 .a.-c.
No. The proposed 13,000 square foot commercial building will not
impact the biological environment, achieve short term goals to the
disadvantage of long term environmental impacts, or have cumulative
impoct,.
21 .d.
No. The traffic study for Plot Plan No. 11222 has ben analyzed to
determine if the additional 16,668 square feat of commercial space will
hove a significant impact on the transportation system in the immediate
are. No significant impacts are expected from the additional retail
SUBIqITrAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF TEECULA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FRON: RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT SUBNZTYAL DATE:
SUBJECT: TEI~'ATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 23430, REVISED PER!qZT NO. 1, MENDED NO. 2
RECOIlENDED ROTION:
ADOPTION of a 'Negative Declaratfon for Environmental Assessment No. 34048
based onthe f.t~nd. tngs that the proposed project wtll not have a significant
effect on the'environment; and,
.~APPROVAL. of/~IBTATIVE PARCEL ~ NO, 23430, .REVISED PERNIT NO. l, ANENDED NO. 2
"..~'based~on:~tl~;flr~d~!r~gS~?and!'*conclustons 'found w~thtn the staff report and subject
to the attached conditions of approval.
PRO~ECr LOCATION: Nest of Inez Road and South of k/Inchester Road.
BACKGROUND:
Land Use andZontnq:
The stte ts currently vacant. Surrounding land uses tnclude commercial uses to
the north, vacant land and a pasture to the east, l~ghttng manufacturing uses
to the south and various commercial and Industrial uses to the west across
Z-15, The stte ts zoned C-P-S. Surrounding zoning Includes C-P-S, to the
north, R-R and A-2-20 to the northeast and east, N-N to the south and the Z-15
freeway to the west.
Comprehensive General Plan:
The project Is located w~th~n the Southwest Area Community Plan. The land use
designation ts C (Commercial). The established zoning on the property conforms
with the proposed land use designation for thts area, and therefore this
project ts consistent wtth the Southwest Area Community Plan and w~th the
Comprehenshe General Plan.
Envt tonmental Assessment:
The tn~t~al study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 34048 ~ndtcated
liquefaction and floodtrig hazards, ~mpacts to local ~mport farmland w~ldllfe
and the Z-15, and Eligible State Scenic Htghway. All of these concerns or
tmpacts have been mitigated to an level of non-significance whtch w~11 be
1mplenented through the conditions of approval.
GG:sc
3/26/90
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COI4MISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 14, 1990
(AGENDA ITEM 3-3 - Tape 3A, 3B)
PARCEL HAP NO. 23430, REVISED NO. 1, AMENDED NO. 2 - EA 34048 - Bedford
Properties, Inc.'- Rancho California Area -Ftrst Supervtsorial Dtstrict- west
of Ynez Rd and south of WInchester Rd - 9 lots - 44.07~ acres - Schedule
E
Hearing was opened at 2:32 p.m. and was closed at 3:02 p.m.
STAFF RECOI~ENDATION: Adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 34048 and
approval of Tentative Parcel Hap No. 23430, Revised Permit No. 1, Amended No.
2, based on the findings and conclusions listed in the staff report. The
applicant proposes to divide 44.07 acres into 9 conmercial lots located west of
Ynez Road and south of Winchester Road. The site, which is currently vacant,
is zoned-C-P-S. Surrounding land uses are conmercial uses, lightsmanufacturing
uses,-a pastUre'an~d vacant property. Surrounding zoning is C'P-S, R-R, A-2-20
and M-M. The project site is located within the Southwest Area Cemmunity Plan
and is designated as Commercial, therefore, the proposal is consistent with the
Plan. Staff added the f~lowing three findings as follows:
6. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent
with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied by the City
of Temecula or which will be studied within a reasonable time by the
.Ct.ty .of 'Tmecul a.
7. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference wtth the City of Temecula's future adopted General Plan If
the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
8. The project canplies with all other applicable requirements of State law
and 1 ocal ordtnances.
Staff amended the Conditions of Approval by deleting Condition No. 17 as there
are no trees on the site at present. 'Further, staff deleted Conditio~ No. 21
regarding the ECS note on trees as that condition is no longer needed.
Cmmtsstoner Turner asked if a plot plan was previously approved by the
Director for this proposed parcel map. Staff advised that there was an
approved plot plan with conditions. Staff advised that the conditions for the
plot plan are basically the same as for the parcel map, however, there was no
mention of trees.
Larry Toerper, Road Department staff, said that the conditions of approval for
the plot plan require the project proponent to construct a 134 foot street,
with more lanes along the frontage and the intersection than required of the
Toyota dealership (CUP 3076). Therefore, the conditions of approval for the
plot plan and parcel map would more than provide for the frontage. The project
would improve Ynez and the intersection of Ynez and WInchester, and would also
signalize both ramps at 1-15 and Winchester as well as the matn entrance to the
shopping center, located about half way down Ynez. Mr. Vtckers asked whether
the conditions for this map the same as imposed on the plot plan, and
Toerper said yes.
32
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COleMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 14, 1990
CamtsstonerDonahoe referenced ttem 3 of the Road Department's letter dated
January 23r. d,;:and Mr. Toerper recanmended delettng Ztem No. 3, as the full
wtdth construction. of Mtnchester ts not required. There have been discussions
about a regtonal center going tn on the southeast corner of WInchester and
Ynez, and that would requirethe wfdentng of the bridge.and of WInchester.
There are no submtttalsas';yet for the regtonal center. Staff advtsed that a
spectftc plan ~as .been submitted. Canmfsstoner Beadltng asked where the "hang
up" was that they-am not requiring everyone to pay tnto that btg Intersection.
Mr. Toerper saidthat, hopefully, there wtll be a road Improvement dtstrtct
formed to fund thtngs 11ke the overpass. By tts very nature, brtdges and
overpasses are not part of frontage requirements. The Road Oepa~tment ts
starttrig a program to.brtng many road Improvement districts to the Board to
Institute, and to have saneone start paytng for then. He satd that a one year
program will reflect a lot of the things these traffic studtes are potnttng the
need for.
TESTZMONY OF PROPONENT:
Greg Ertckson, Bedford Properties, satd that they support the Toyota project
(previous case) as they felt that tt would beneftt the ctty through sales tax
and also the-Me11.o RoosOtstrtct, whtch ts pendtng. The property to the east
ts also owned bythetr company and they plan on developing a regtonal mall,
hotels, offlce buildings, restaurants, etc. They are processing a spectftc
plan, an EZR, and associated studtes tn order to butld that project. He said
that Bedford has been worktrig for a long ttme with the Road Oeparl=ent and
Caltrans to try and resolve sane trafftc problems. They came tn wtth a trafftc
study that showed a mtntmum level of Improvements which they agreed to provtde
and, through the Road Department, they plan to provtde additional Improvements
over and above what ts requtred by thts project. The extsttng Assessment
0tstrtct No. 161 wtll help alleviate the congestion at that Intersectton and
overcrossing at least for a couple years.
Mr. Ertckson satd that there are a couple long range problems, such as the
wtdentng of the Mtnchester Road overcrossing and the construction of the
Aprtcot overcrossing. They need beneftt districts to provtde for those
Improvements. The Hello Roos 01strict, whtch has been adopted by the County
and ts now before the'Ctty of Temecula, can provtde fundtng for the Apricot
overcrossing. All thetr plans are tn various stages of plan check.
Canmtsstoner Turner said that the Aprtcot overcrossing would be located at the
bottan of the project. Mr. Ertckson Indicated on the exhtbtt where the Aprtcot
overcrossing would go, and satd that the rlght of way would be spllt SO-SO
between thetr property and the adjacent property owner (A.C.S.). They acquired
the rtght of way on the west stde. A.C.S, through a bustness agreement, agreed
to the rtght of my for Aprtcot, and are ccmlng tn wtth a plot plan
demonstrating that tn the near future.
Mr. Ertckson said that the trafftc studtes were done to provtde for Level of
Servtce (LOS) "C" or "O," depending upon land use, and thts trafftc study was
33
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 14, 1990
conditioned to provide a LOS "D." This project has conditions to provide two
lanes each way on Ynez without turn pockets, a signal at Winchester and Ynez,
and a signalized road crossing. In addition to those improvements, they
realize that as a major development in the area, future traffic can cause a 1 ot
of problems, and they are sensitive to that issue. To meet those concerns,
they are widening Ynez to a 134 foot right of way, which allows for six lanes,
with the help of an assessment district. They will provide for double left
turn pockets on Winchester and Ynez into the shopping center, and will
signalize the overcrossing. They are working on right of way for Apricot and
will set back the buildings voluntarily in order to provide room for a loop
ramp, which would be required. Their timing is planned in order to get this
project going later this year. He did not know if the Toyota project will be
successful in having their conditions waived, but he would appreciate their
cooperation in helping them get applicable encroachment permits and so forth.
Cowntssioner Turner asked the timing on the Assessment District. Mr. Erickson
said that Assessment District 161 was formed by selling Series B bonds. If the
bonds do not come through in time, they will do upfront funding through a
letter of credit and be reimbursed by the bonds. That would take care of
Winchester Road. Ynez Road will be funded through developer funds as will the
Winchester overcrossing. Apricot has been included within the existing Mello
'Roos District approved by the County, but that still needs to be approved by
the City. If the city approves the District, then they will have the Apricot
overcrossing built some time in the future. Caltrans has not given their
approval, and that will probably take about two years to get. However, with
the first phase of the Mello Roos District, they will fund the design and
engineering, then hope to build the overcrossing in the second phase.
Assessment District 161 includes the Winchester overcrossing, so that can be
improved. Lacking those two, they can form a bridge benefit district, which
they are doing with Rancho California Road.
Commissioner Turner asked Mr. Erickson if they had any suggestions regarding
the Toyota project. Mr. Erickson said they could meet with the proponents and
let them know what their schedule is. Everything is now in plan check, but
working with Caltrans takes a long time.
Mr. Erickson said he had some questions regarding the Road Department letter,
first page, item 2. He was not familiar with that condition and asked that
that it be modified to make it consistent with this parcel map request by
stating, prior to the recordation of the parcel map. He requested that the
Road Department assist them in their attempts to meet those conditions, as they
were concerned about the timing. He asked that item 5 be amended to read LOS
"D" rather than LOS "C". Item 6 has already been explained (Apricot
overcrossing).
Ed Studor, Road Department staff, said in reference to item 2 that the South
Coast Air Quality Management District is becoming more and more involved with
projects and the Road Department is 1 ooking for a letter from them regarding
whether they have any comments or concerns. This site is within the service
34
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COHMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 14, 1990
area of the Riverside Transit Agency. The population is growing in this area
and, therefore, this site would be a candidate for RTA services in the future.
The Riverside County Transportation Commission is expressing more and more
interest in projects that have an impact on regional facilities. Commissioner
Turner said that it does not say that they are 1 ooking for input or conments,
but rather clearance from those agencies. He asked if some of those people
would have the ability to shut down this project. Mr. Studor said that the
Road Department is 1 ooking for any additional requirements that those agencies
may ~sh to impose, and added that Caltrans has the ability not to issue a
permit. Mr. Erickson said that he had no problem with Caltrans, but he did
with the others. He does not know how 1 ong it would take those agencies to
respond, as they may not be set up to provide clearances.
Mr. Richards explained that the Southwest Area Plan set up two tiers of special
policies regarding transportation and circulation. The first tier is all the
physical improvements necessary. The second tier, in order to get to an
acceptable level of service, is all the operational kinds of things that occur
with respect to transportation management, such as car-pooling associations,
etc. What is happening is that, technically, under SWAP, this parcel map
should have been transmitted to those agencies initially. In an effort to move
this along, the Road Department suggested requesting a clearance rather than
having to transmit to those agencies at this time. Under SWAP, those are
legitimate clearance agencies. Mr. Erickson said that it will take time before
this item gets to the City Council, therefore, they can investigate this
condition. As this is a parcel map, they would like the condition to read,
'"prior to recordation" rather than "prior to issuance of building permits."
They already have an approved plot plan and they will be trying to pull
building permits soon. Mr. Toerper said that the only issue he sees would be
if they tie this to recordation of the parcel map, and not to the building
permits, and any of those agencies have requirements that may require even a
slight redesign of the plot plan or some accommodation, then how would that be
addressed if the building permits have been issued and construction started.
Mr. Vickers said if Bedford pulls the parcel map, they can still build on this
site, as they have an approved plot plan. This is a financing parcel map so
that they can divide up and sell off the lots. He suggested changing that
condition to read prior to recordation of the parcel map.. Mr. Toerper
concurred. He added that Item 5 can be amended to read Level of Service "D,"
and that Item 6 could stay. Mr. Studor advised that a new Road Department
letter will be issued with today's date.
Commissioner Donahoe said that she was curious about the parcel map lines, in
particular the jagged lines. Mr. Erickson explained that each parcel has to
have parking for its own use. Commissioner Donahoe referred to Parcel 4, and
Mr. Erickson said that he believed that that jog was in error. There was no
one else who wished to comment.
The hearing was closed at 3:02 p.m.
35
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 14, 1990
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23430, Revised No. 1,
Amended No. 2, proposed to divide 44.07 acres into 9 commercial lots in the
Rancho California Area; the site is currently vacant; surrounding land uses
include cemmercial uses, vacant land, a pasture and light manufacturing uses;
the site is zoned C-P-S; surrounding zoning includes C-P-S, R-R, A-2-20 and
H-M; the site is located with the Southwest Area Community Plan; the land use
designation is C {Commercial); environmental concerns include liquefaction and
flooding hazards and impacts to farmland, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat and
Scenic highways; there is a reasonable probability that the project will be
consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied by the
City of Temecula or which will be studied within a reasonable time by the City
of Temecula; there is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the City of Temecula°s future adopted General Plan if the
project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan; and, the project complies
with all other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. The
proposed project is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan within
the Comprehensive General Plan and Ordinance 460; is compatible with area
development; and, will not have a significant effect on the environment.
MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Donahoe,
and unanimously carried, the Commission recommended to the City of Temecula
adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 34048, and approval of Tentative
Parcel Map NO. 23430, Revised Permit No. 1, Amended No. 2, subject to the
conditions of approval as amended this date, and based on the above listed
findings and conclusions.
36
Zoning Area: Rancho California
First Supervisorial District
E.A. Number 34048
Regional Team No. 5
PARCEL ~AP MO. 23430
REVISED PERMIT NO. 1
AMENDED ND. 2
Planning Connission: 2-14-90
Agenda Item No. 3-3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLAMNIN6 DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
1. Applicant:
2. Engineer/Rep.:
3. Type of Request:
4. Location:
5. Existing Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
Comprehensive General Plan
Designation:
10. Land Division Data:
11. Agency Reconmendations:
12. Letters:
13. Sphere of Influence:
Bedford Properties Inc.
J.F. Davidson and Associates
To divide 44.07 acres into 9
commercial lots.
West of Inez Road, and South of
Winchester Road.
C-P-S
C-P-S, R-R, A-2-20, H-M
The site is currently flat and
vacant with dry grasses.
Conmercial uses, a pasture and
vacant.
Southwest Area Community Plan
(C) Commercial
Land Use: Category II
Open Space/Cons: Areas not
Designated as Open Space
Total Acreage: 44.07
Total Lots: g
See letters dated:
Road: ~-~-!)&) 2-14-90
Health: 12-06-89
F1 ood: 12-06-89
Fire: 12-04-89
B1 dg. & Safety-
Land Use: 12-13-89
Grading: 10-12-89
County Geologist: 8-15-89
Opposing/Supporting: None received
Within City of Temecula's city
1 imi ts
ANALYSIS:
~roject Descripti on
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23430, Revised No. 1, Amended no. 2 is an application
to divide 44.07 acres into g conmercial lots in the Rancho California area.
The site is located west of Inez Road and south of Winchester Road.
PARCI=I I..AP NO. 23430
REVISED PE]IIqIT NO. 1
ARE!IDEDRO. 2
Staff Report
Page 2
Land Use and Zontng:
The site is currently vacant. Surrounding land uses include commercial uses to
the north, vacant land and a pasture to the east, light manufacturing uses to
the south and various commercial and industrial uses to the west across 1-15.
The site is zoned C-P-S. Surrounding zoning includes C-P-S, to the north, R-R
and A-2-20 to the northeast and east, H-H to the south and the 1-15 freeway to
the west.
Cmprehenstve General Plan:
The project is located within the Southwest Area Community Plan. The land use
designation is C (Commercial). The established zoning on the property conforms
with the proposed land use designation for this area, and therefore this
project is consistent with the Southwest Area Camnunity Plan and with the
Comprehensive General Plan.
Environmental Assessment:
The initial study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 34048 indicated
liquefaction and flooding hazards, impacts to local important farmland wildlife
and the 1-15, an Eligible State Scenic Highway. All of these concerns or
impacts have been mitigated to an level of non-significance which will be
implemented through the conditions of approval.
FINDINGS:
1. Tentative Parcel Hap No. 23430, Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2 proposed
divide 44.07 acres into g commercial lots in the Rancho California Area.
to
2. The site is currently vacant. Surrounding land uses include commercial
uses, vacant land, a pasture and light manufacturing uses.
3. The site is zoned C-P-S. Surrounding zoning includes C-P-S, R-R, A-2-20,
and
4. The site is. located with the Southwest Area Camunity Plan. The land use
designation is C (Commercial).
5. Environmental concerns include 1 iquefaction and flooding hazards and
impacts to farmland, Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat and Scenic highways.
There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with
the General Plan proposal being studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time. (Added at Planning Ccmmis.sion 2-14-g0)
PARCEL MAP NO. 23430
REV/SED PERH/T RO. Z
AMERDEDRO. 2
Staff Report
Page 3
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is
ultimately inconsistent with the General Plan. (Added at Planning
Canmission 2-14-g0)
8. The project canplies with all other applicatl e requirements of State law
and local ordinances. (Added at Planning Canmission 2-14-90}
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan
within the Comprehensive General Plan and Ordinance 460.
2. The proposed project is compatible with area development.
3. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
RECOR4ENOATIONS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 34048
based on the findings that the proposed project will not have a significant
effect on the environment; and,
APPROVAL of TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 23430, REVISED PERHIT NO. 1, ARERDED NO. 2
based on the findings and conclusions found within the staff report and subject
to the attached conditions of approval.
GG:sc:gs
1/23/90:3/14/90
' I PM 23430 LANDUSE } I
' : i~ I ; "' ,~-',,,,
/ ~ ~ ~ .' '~.....,,'/
/,, , ;__'~ '~ ~F,^sTu.."'
. '::!i="'~ :--'.."-', ! .
· ~ KAISER DEVELOPMENT C'oMP. ~
/' ~ "' ~ '~,1 FREEWAY lIABLE
I PM 23430
.... J EXISTING ZONING t 3
\ "' ' IN
II i%%
R-R /? )~
Ii I I
' II //
/ R-R
"('~ .-... p ~!~!':i!i..:.. ~/"
~ 44.01 ACRES INTO l"~"'~' ;"' "' ,.~
t e, Area RANCHO CALIFORNIA Ist SelLlid.
/ ,, · · · · re · · ,
·., ~'~ ..... ...
I
! I'M 23430
f
cz 4SlO&
C
I CP- SWAP
15
/ ~|
// //
I/
RLI
"',.
12-5 DU! A
~ . ~ ' '~ ~ 8-16 DU/AC
--. .,,;
· -;. ..,,Y -., ~'~,,
I'AIIP. KAISER BEV, ELOPMENT COMP.j
, i. be 44'.01 'ACRES INTO 8 LOTS ' "J
· ,". .° e · ' ' :' '
;"."Z. '.,,';,;.; ;";;. , :..,'Z;", .,.'
-"- F. lemaet (~) FREEWAY VARIABLE
;tI I,. ..... E, ; ' .
PLAMMING COI~ISSION HEARIRG DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1990
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLARNIIIG DEPARTMENT
COIIDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TEIlTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23430, REVISED PERMIT NO. 1, AIqEffi)ED NO. 2
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold hamless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, actfon, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning TBTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23430, REVISED PERMIT NO. 1, AMENDED
IK). 2, which action is brought within the time period provfded for in
California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully tn the defense.
If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully tn the defense, the
subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or
hold harmless the County of Riverside.
The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance
460, Schedule E unless modified by the conditions listed below. This
approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Board of
Supervisors approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed
land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Hap Act, Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance 460.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the County Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to
approval of the Road Commissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for
nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of
dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by
the Riverside County Surveyor.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the
parcel map boundary to a County maintained road.
TEIITATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 23430
REVISED PERHIT NO. 1
NEM)ED NO. 2
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
10.
11.
12.
51
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in canpliance with the Unifom
Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be submitted
to the County Department of Building and Safety.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated t-~3-GOy 2-14-90, a
copy of which is attached. {Amended at Planning Canmission 2-14-g0)
The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recanmendations
outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated 12-06-89, a
copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shal 1 canply with the flood control recanmendati ons
outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated
12-06-89, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within
an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of
Riverside County Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the
construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road
Canmissioner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel
map.
The subdivider shall canply with the fire improvement recanmendations
outlined in the County Fire Department 's letter dated 12-04-89, a copy of
which is attached.
The subdivider shall canply with the recanmendations outlined in the
Building and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated
12-13-89, a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recanmendations outlined in the
Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated
10-12-89, a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall canply with the
Geologic Report No. 418 update and in the
dated 8-15-89, a copy of which is attached.
recommendattons outlined County
County Geologist transmittal
TENTATIVE PARCEl, IqAP NO. 23430
REVISED PERMIT NO. 1
ANEIIDEDNO. 2
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
16. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the C-P-S zone.
A;~ eMis~in9 (Fees ee ~ke sub~ee~ pFe~eF~y wi~k a ~FNnW diame~eF g~ea~eF
~kan ~eeF ~4~ inekes ska~ be pveseFved, Reeeva~ skiS; be a( ~ke
d4sspe~iee ef ~he P4aenieg D4vee(ff, (Deleted at Planning Conmission
2-14-90}
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FILIAL MAP
18. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the following condition{s}
shall be complied with:
a. A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet {ECS} shall
transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
be
ENVIRO!I4ENTAL CO~STRAINT SHEET COIIDITIONS
19. An Environmental Constraints Sheet {ECS} shall be prepared with the final
map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be
permanently filed with the Office of the County Surveyor. Prior to the
recordation of the final map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to
the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall
be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning
Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following
note(s} shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
a. "The notice appearing in Section 6.a. of Ordinance ~o. 625, the
Riverside County RtVht-to-Farm Ordinance, shall be placed on the
Environmental Constraints Sheet, with Lots No. 1 thru g identified
therein, in the manner provided in said Section 6.a., as being located
partly or wholly within, or within 300 feet of, land zoned for
primarily agricultural purposes by the County of Riverside."
b. "County Archaeological Report No. 1203 was prepared for this property
on 3-2B-BB by Christopher Drover, and is on file at the Riverside
County Planning Department.
c. "County Biological Report No. 195 was prepared for this property in
Narch lg88 by the Planning Center, and is on file at the Riverside
County Planning Department.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23430
REVISED PEI~IT nO. 1
AMEI~EDNO. 2
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
d. "County Geological Report No. 41B-update was prepared for this
property on April 14, 19Bg by Highland Geotechnical Consultants and is
on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items
of concern in the report are as follows: liquefaction.
e. "This property is located with thirty (30) miles of ,ount Palcmar
Observatory. Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the
observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be frcm low pressure sodium lamps
that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above
the horizontal plane passing through the luminare."
20. The following note shall be placed on the final nap: "Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor. These constraints affects all parcels.
~, ~ke Envire~men(al Ge~e~rain( 8kee~ ska44 de~ieea(e ~he e, ea)yp(Hs (~ees
amd oak ~ee Rear ~ke i,~ewsee~ie~ e~ Highway ~O and ¥ne~ R~ad as
4Mdiea~ed im G~m~y Bie~Jiea~ Re~ Nk ~e6~ A me~e ska4~ a~se be
piened e~ ~he B,~vG, Ghee~ ~(a~img+ ~Ne sw~aee a~e~a~4~ e~ wm~a~ ~
~ees skel~ Mew~ in the de~imea(ed a~ea, Rei~a~i~ ~ ~ep~aeeee( e(
mkese ~ees ia sub~ee~ ~e mke appv~e~ ~ ~ke P4enni.~ Diwee~e~,u
(Daleclad at Planning C~mission 2-1~90)
22. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying fee required by that ordinance which is based
on the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development. Should
Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
23. This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Pri or to
issuance of any building permit by the Riverside County Department of
Building and Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall
certify that the intended structure or building is safe and structurally
integrated.. This certification shall be based upon, but not be limited
to, the site specific seismic, geologic and geotechnical conditions.
Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development is determined to exist,
appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated.
GG:sc:gs
1/23/90
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
Lf. Roy D. Smoot
I:}AD CDHHISSII3NI3 & COUNT}' SURVt~'OR
February 14, 1990
~m~uarT-~2er-ige~
COt,.'NTT AI)f4NISTRATI%T CL',TER
HAII.NG ADOREiS;
P.O. BOX 1090
aIDE. CALIFOR.NL~ 92502
(714) 117-6554
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
(Shopping Center)
I~: PM 23430-Revised #1-Amend #2
Team 5 - SIft) #9
AP #111-111-111-9
*As amended at P.C. 2-14-90
The Road Departanent has reviewed the traffic study for this
project. The study indicates a projected Level of Service "C" on
both Winchester Road and Ynez Road, based upon substantial
improvement. The Comprehensive General Plan circulation policies
relative to Category II Land Uses states: "A minimum of Level of
Service "C" is necessary for any new Category II land use." As
such, the proposed project is consistent with this General Plan
policy.
The following conditions of approval incorporate mitigation
measures identified in the traffic study which are necessary to
achieve or maintain the required level of service.
The project proponent shall incorporate such demand
programs as may be appropriate to comply with the goals and
objectives of t31e Regional Mobility Plan and Air Quality
Management Plan, including: a) design provisions to
accommodate transit servicesl and b) Participation in
regional corridor studies~ all as approved and confirmed by
the Road CoHaissioner.
Prior to the-iss~r~}e-et-~M~--b~~g-t~eemite~- recordation
of ~he f~al ~p, ~e p~J~= pro~nent shall co~ult with
~d ob=ah cl~~e fr~ ~he follow~g agencies ~o assure
c~li~e ~ coor~=e wi=h the Regio~l Mobility and
~ ~li~ M~g~n~ Pl~s~ a) Cal~r~s, Dls~ric~ 8~ b)
T~ Sou~ ~as~r Quali~yM~ag~ District (S~Q~)~
c) The ~rside ~it Agency (RTA)~ ~d d) T~ Riverside
Co~=y ~s~ation C~ission (R~).
*As amended at P.C. 2-14-90
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER · 4080 LEMON STREET · RIVERSIDE, CAMIrON 92501
PN 23430-Revised #l-Amend ~2
aeRee~y-aa~-&99e February 14, 1990
Page 2
Ynez Road shall be constructed to a full width Urban
Arterial standards, 134' right-of-way along the frontage of
PH 23430.
The project proponent construct the traffic signals at the
freeway interchange. This is necessary to attain a Level of
Service a{:- "D" .
The plot plan should delineate the future Apricot right-of-
way as proposed by the developer for informational
purposes.
After a review of the Operation Analysis submitted for the
proposed access points for the project, the Road Department's
requirements shall bez
Install the primary entry to the Palm Plaza project as a
standard intersection with a signal midway between
Winchester Road and Apricot Street.
Install two additional driveways, one as a right turn
in/right turn out located midway between Winchester Road
and the primary entry, and the other located midwaybetween
Apricot and the primaryentry. The southerly driveway shall
have a channelizedmedian opening for left turn in only, as
long as access rights are dedicated on the eastside of
Ynez, except for two access points. The southerly opening
shall not line up with the left turn in opening
With respect
referenced item,
recommendationst
to the conditions of
the Road Department
approval for the above
has the following
Sufficient right of way along Winchester Road (State
Highway 79) shall be conveyed for public use to provide for
a 134 foot full width right of way.
10. Sufficient public street right of way shall be provided
along Ynez Road to establish a 134 foot full width right of
way including standard corner cutback. Developer shall
dedicate to Riverside County all vehicular access rights
along the east side of Yv~z Road from Winchester Road,
southerly to the south line of this project, with only two
access points allowed. The two access points shall bez (1)
opposite the signalized entrance to this proJect~ (2) north
of (not aligning with) the southerly drive approach to this
project.
· As amended at P.C. 2-14-90
· *As deleted at P.C. 2-14-90
PN 23430-Revised #l-Amend #2
aaR~ary-~g~-~99e February 14, 1990
Page 3
14.
Prior to recordation or any use allowed by this permit, and
prior to doing any work within the State highway right of
way, clearance and/or an encroachment permit must be
obtained by the applicant from the District 08 Office of
the State Department of Transportation in San Bernardino.
The project proponent shall enter into a written agreement
with the County of R~verside and Caltrans District 08 to
provide for the design and construction of signals and
related facilities at the following intersectionez
a. Winchester Road at 1-15 ramp facilities
b. Winchester Road at Ynez Road
Winchester Road (State Highway 79) and Ynez Road shall be
improved with concrete curb and gutter located 110 feet
curb to curb and match up asphalt concrete paving~
reconstruction~ or resurfacing of existing paving as
determined by the Road Commissioner within a 134 foot full
width dedicated right of way in accordance with County
Standard No. 100A, iD~luding all necessary transitions as
per Caltrans standards as approved by the Road
Commissioner.
The landdivider shall construct
on Winchester Road and Ynez Road
Ccmmttssioner.
full width raised medians
as approved by the Road
Standard 35 foot curb return, cross
access ramps shall he constructed
Ordinance 461 where applicable.
gutter, spandrel and
in accordance with
Six foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along
Winchester Road (State Highway 79) and Ynez Road in
accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb
sidewalk).
Improvement plans shall be based upen a centerline profile
extendinga minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Commissioner. Improvement plans
shall include all traffic signal design plans as described
in Condition #5 and 22.
Major drainage is involved on this project and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Commissioner.
PN 23430-Revised tl-Amend #2
aam~aPy-aav~ggG--February 14, 1990
Page 4
2.~a.
Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section
11.1.
All work dons within County right of way shall have an
encroachment permit.
All driveways shall
County Standards
improvement plans.
conform to
and shall
the applicable Riverside
be shown on the street
All entrance driveways shall be channelized with concrete
curb and gutter to prevent 'back-on" parking and interior
drives from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum
distance of 50 feet measured from face of curb.
The primary Anterior driveways shall be kept free of all
'back-on" parking.
Projects creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance
control and slope easements as approvedby the Road
Department.
The project proponent shall be responsible for the design
and construction of signals and related facilities at the
locations listed below. Said signalized locations shall be
operational prior to occupancy of any development projects=
a. Winchester Road at 1-15 ramp facilities
b. Winchester Road at Ynez Road
c. Ynez Road at center driveway
The above shall be designed and constructed at no cost to
any government agency. Should tha project proponent
request reimbursenent from the signal mitigation fund
(except for location 'c'), it shell be made to the Board of
Supervisors or governing agency and subject to their
approval.
The traffic signal at the center driveway shall be
constructed and funded by the developer with no credit
applied towards developer's signal mitigation fees.
A striping plen is required for Winchester Road (State
Highway 79) and Ynez Road. The removal of the existing
striping shall. bathe responsibility of applicant. Traffic
signing and striping shall be dons by County forces with
all incurred costs borne by the applicant.
PM 23430-Revised #l-Amend #2
aaeaaPy-aa,-~99e- February 14, 1990
Page 5
The applicant shall comply with the Caltrans recon~end-
ations as outlined in their letter dated July 11, 1989.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Road Department standards and require approval
by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape
plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet
format ( 24" x 36" ). Landscape plans shall be submitted
with the street imp~ove. ent plans a~t shall depict ~
such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are
to be placed within the public road rights-of-way.
Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit
district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make
application for and pay for their reapportionment of the
assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district
unless said fees are deferred to building permit.
Prior to recordat ion, the
Businessman' s Association
easements for legal access
Commissioner.
applicant shall establish a
to provide for reciprocal
as approved by the Road
Sincere ly,
Road Division Engineer
LTz Jw
County of Riverside
TO: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
A1 '~NMENTAL
FROM:
DATE: December 6, 1989
HEALTH SPECIALIST IV
RE: PARCEL HAP 23430, AMENDED NO. 2, REVISED NO. I
Environmental Health Services has revieved Amended No. 2,
Revised No. I dated November 17, 1989. Our current commmenta
SM:tac ~
[
DEC 0 8 198~1
" ~'R'TMENT
. COUNTY OF ]RIVERSIDE
..... DEPARTMENT
' "' ,._., of HEALTH
-...-,.,.,.
I1£. IIILI [9,I-et.~N,
April 22. 1988
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
RIverside. CA 92502
Attn: Greg Ne, l
~4t. CA IsJll&
&OJ SOUIN MI&
.:OleOseA. CA litlo
illlit
leo eeOlevm ITmll IT.
el-NO ~ I~111lt
¢I~KI. ~a ellis
!It e~efee *~' ~
keNOil
PU~; Parcel Hap 23430; That portion of Lots 115 and 116 of
Tamecull Land and Water Company in the County of Riverside.
State of California. as shown by map on file an Book 8. Page
359 of Naps. Records of San Diego County. California
(Q Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tent. alive Map
No. 23430 and recommends that:
A water system shall be artstailed accordahg to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prlndts of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a man]mum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet. along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall IhOv the internal pipe diameter.
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with Div. S, Part l. Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code. California
Administrative Code, Title 22. Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California. when applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Amended No.~ *1,-~
Page Two
Attn: Grog Ne,l
April 22. 1988
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and
water company with the following cert~ficaLion: "I
certify that the design of the v, ter system in P,rcel
Map 23430 is in accordance with the water system
expansion plans of the Rancho Calxforni, Water
District and that the water service,storage and
distribution system vii] be adequate to provmde water
service to such parcel. This certification does not
constitute , guarantee that it viii supply water to
such parcel at any ,pecSfic quantities. flows or
pressures for Fire protection or any other purpose".
This certification sha/l be s~gned by , responsmble
official of the water company.
submitt~_~g,~D~_~gD~,Survevor's OFfice to ~ev~e~
least two weeks ~zor to the r~guest for the
recordation of the
Thms Department has a statement From the Rancho Calmfornia
Water D~strict agreeing to serve domestic water to each and
every lot mn the subdivxsmon on demand provxdXng
satisfactory fmnancmal arrangements are completed with the
,ubdivzder. Zt will be necessary for the fznanc~]
arrangements to be made prior to the recordatmon of the
final map.
This Department has a statement from the Eastern HunzcmVal
Water Dzstr~ct agreein~ to allow the subd~viszon sewage
system to be connected to the sewers of the Dzstr~ct. The
sewer system shall be Installed according to plans and
speciricatzons as approved by the D~strzct, the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans oF the sever system shall be submitted Zn triplmcate,
along vz-th the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the Internal pipe diameter. location of
manholes, complete profiles. pipe and joint speclFmcations
and the sixe of the sewers at the Junction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines and' water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be sigmed by a
registered engineer and the sewer dlstrict with the
following certification: "I certify that the delign of the
se~er system in Parcel Nap 23430 ~s in accordance with the
swear system expansion plans of the Eastern Nunicipal Water
D~str~ct and that the waste disposal system 3s adequate at
this time to treat the anticipated wastes From the proposed
parcel."
Rzvers:de CounLy Planning Dept.
Amended No. ~ q,,,
Page Three
AT]N: Greg Neal
April 22, Z988
~__!_~ns must_b_e submztted to the
to rqv~ev at !~st two w~_R~!gK_to
It v:ll be necessary for fznanc~al arrangements to be made
prior to the recordation o~ the final map.
ILbvzJJ be necessary for the annexatzon proceedings to be
completely/snalized prsor to recordat~on or the f~na! ~,ap.
S:ncerely.
· Sa"tN~a~' an '
EnvsronmentaJ Health Services
£M:tac
KENNETH L EDWARDS
CHIEF ENdSINtER
lggS MARKET STREET
P.O. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE (714) 787-2015
FAX NO, (714) 788-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALJFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No.
Planner ~w,l/~
Area:
Re:
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated ~'- ~'C~ is still current for this project·
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements
accordance with approved plans.
· The project will be
t n
have been construc ed i
The attached comments apply.
KwNNLITH I_ EDWARDS
CHIEF ENelNELI!
fill MARK~'T rrRIET
P. O. BOX 1033
I'Ei,EPHONE (714) 717-a012
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERlIDS'', CAI, IFORNIA IZIO~
August 3, 1989
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention:
Regional Team No. 5
Gloria Maciel
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
Parcel Map 23430
Revised Permit
This is a proposal to divide 44 acres into a 9 lot commercial
subdivision in the Temecula area, on the southwest corner of Ynez
Road and Winchester Road, and adjacent to Interstate 15.
The site is on relatively flat terrain between Santa Gertrudis
Creek to the north and a large unnamed wash to the south. Santa
Gertrudis Creek is contained by newly constructed facilities.
The unnamed wash has capacity for perhaps a third of its 100 year
peak flow rate of 1250 cfs. The reinforced concrete box where
the wash crosses North General Kearny Road is undersized. Large
amounts of runoff from this wash will spill over onto an open
field to the northeast of the subject property and join with run-
off from a local watershed of 300 acres. These combined flows
sheet across Ynez Road onto the subject property. Water ponds on
the property as it seeks enough energy to pass through an exist-
ing 7' wide x 3' high reinforced concrete box beneath Interstate
15. As the pond gets higher, some flow will outlet in a Caltrans
interceptor channel toward more freeway culverts to the south.
This project proposes to intercept the sheet flows with a tem-
porary channel offsite along the east side of Ynez Road and carry
them to the box culvert under Ynez Road to the channel along the
south side of this project.
The applicant indicates that the ponding elevation upstream of
the freeway is 1043.7, that their project would not decrease the
existing pond volume and that all new buildings would be flood-
proofed to at least that elevation.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 23q30
Revised Permit
- 2 -
August 3, 1989
Following are the District's recommendations:
This parcel map is located within the limits of the
Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for
which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board·
Drainage fees shall be paid as set forth under the provi-
sions of the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of
Area Drainage Plans", amended February 16, 1988:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner
as part of the filing for record of the subdivision
final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a
final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be
paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording
a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of
the parcel map; or
At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment
of fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Build-
ing Director at the time of issuance of a grading
permit or building permit for each approved parcel,
whichever may be first obtained after the recording
of the subdivision final map or parcel mapl provided
however, this option to defer the fees may not be
exercised for any parcel where grading or structures
have been initiated on the parcel within the prior 3
year period, or permits for either activity have been
issued on that parcel which remain active.
The preservation of the 1043.7 pond elevation should be
proven with appropriate hydraulic and topographic
information.
The proposed interim channel on the east side of Ynez
Road should be constructed with the first phase of this
project· The channel should have capacity to carry the
storm runoff from the 300 acres. The 640 cfs breakout
should also be carried unless upstream facilities have
been improved· Maintenance should be provided.
The RCB under Ynez Road and the channel along the south
boundary of the pro]eet should have capacity to carry the
100 year peak runoff from its tributary area with full
development assumed. If they do not have capacity they
should be enlarged or other measures should be taken.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 23430
Revised Permit
-3-
August 3, 1989
The onsite channel should be constructed to District
standards including those relating to design, alignment
and access. If the District is to maintain the channel,
the applicant will have to pay a maintenance charge.
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected property owners. The documents should be re-
corded and a copy submitted to the District prior to
recordation of the final map.
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions".
A note should be put on the environmental constraint
sheet stating, "Finished floors of buildings shall be
constructed above elevation 1043.7".
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to reeorda-
tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved
prior to issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to the Subdivi-
sion section of this office at 714/~87-2884.
1)
2)
Ve r yJ t,~,~,
iv~l ~ng~neer
J. F. Davidson ~ssociat
~ancho California Development Co.
KF:bjp
fiRECHID
12-~.e9
tbeakC&m0t
ATDh GLOIL~ )tACZF. L
RKVZIKD PARCEL HAP 23i30 - A)fI:~F...D t2
ca rife Department Feesmends the follov~nJ fire protection ueeouree be provided
4eao~ofdmieear~Ch Liverside County Ordinances rid/or reeolnised fire protection
standards:
The valor mane ah&~l be capable of providing · potential fire flow of 5000 glq4
and an aceear fire flay avetreble from any on hydrant ehaZZ be 2000 ~ for
hours duration aC 20 rsz residue1 operatinS pressure.
Approved outer fire hydrants, (6'xi"x2-2|') ebb11 be located az each street
intersection and spaced not mrs than 330 fast apart in any direstion, with
no portion of any log frontale nora ttmn 165 feec ffou a fire hydrant.
App14Lcauc/developer sba~l fernlab one copy of the wager eyeCos prune Co the
/ire DeterMe for rmw. 1~0 eh~l c~o~ to fire hydrutt,,,, rotation
be qud/~~ by · reiterated c~vtl e~ner ~ the 1oul uCer c~euy
~ the fo11~ certifiesclot 'Z cerCL~ c~C the desip or the ~ter eyetom
U b accords vtch the requiremace proscribed by the Uveretde ~uucy Fire
The required water eyetee includLuI fire hydrants shall be tnecaXZed and accepted
by the appropriate racer qeEcy prior to any eoubustibte buildinS mtertL~ being
p3.ued on u individual lot.
ALe questions reSetdins the menial of the conditions shell be referred co the
/ire DeparMt rle--4~l and hSiJieerLnl mtdf,
IAXM0aD B. liars
C~e~ rireh. parUtut rleuner
guft Xm:A've11, rife leEely 8p.eciLIJJt
Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
December 13, 1989
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: Gloria Guzman
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Parcel Map 23430 - Revised, Amended #2
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for
all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of
the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348.
The site is located in a special studies zone -- G-418.
Lot configuration shall conform to site development of PP 11222.
Very truly yours,
Senior Land Use Technician
/sn
Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020
02/86/98
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUILDINO AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADINO SECTION
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
APN:
PLANNING / GLO~A GUZKAN
PM 23430 AMENDED
The information provided on this pro~ect did not include'a conceptual grading
plan. HoWever, sufficient information was supplied for us to recommend
approval wi:h the following conditions.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from
the Building and Safety Department.
Grading in excess of 199 cubic Farde will require performance securi:y
to be'posted with the Building and Safety department.
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide ~he applicable information
from Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21,284-88.
and 284-46. These forms are available at the Buildin8 and Safety Departme~
offices.
McLaughlin, WM
McLaugnlin Marjorie
8705 Glider Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90045
911120020-8
118
Heberle, Jack
Compton, Jeffrey
P.O. Box 1152
Temecula, CA 92390
911130017-7.
913260040-4 1~'4'
Blake, Joseph
Stephens, Alber~ D
C/O A.D. Stephens
P.O. Box 6324 '
San Pedro, CA 90734
132
Margarita Prop
28530 Via Los Flores
Murrie~a, CA 92362
913260019-5
Joseph Blake ll5
Alber~ Stephens
C/O A D Stephens
P.O. Box 6324
San Pedro, CA 90734
911-130-015-5
-~"u~ta Mayrl
.9510 Avenida Del Sol
Temecula, CA 92390
921-140-014
Jack Heberle 111'
Jeffrey Compton
P.O. Box 1152
Temecula, CA 92390
39
911-130-017-7
40
Donald J. & Marilyn K. Mowrer
29515 Avenida Del Sol
Temecula, CA 92390
921-140-015
Victor Holchak 113
Noma Holchak
1602 W 65TH Street
Los Angeles, CA 90047
911-130-020-9
Rancho Mobile Home Est
2312 W Olive Ave Ste A
~'rbank, CA 91506
921-290-001
46
Edwin Kirkpatrick 119
Dorothy Kirkpatrick
6745 S Elman Street
San Diego,' CA 92111
~11 _1 ~_~_1
Scharnagl, Gary F.
Scharnagl. Paula K.
,0666 La Colima Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
Werbil, J. Rex
Werbil, Wanda J.
2208 E. Via Mariposa No. N
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
919052001-7
29
27
Hepler, Kenneth R.
Hepler, Ellen L.
~0735 La Colima Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
919052003-9
25
Nelsen, Paul E.
Nelsen, Susan G.
40685 La Colima Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
919052005-1
Aanderud, Dianne L.
406~5 La Colima Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
919052007-3
23
21
Paquet~e, Edward H.
.... Paqueuze, jenne A.
40595 La Colima Rd.
Rancho California, CA 92390
919052009-5
50
Toyota Motor Distribuuors, Inc.
19001 S. Western Ave.
Torrance, CA 90509
921080039-6
919052002-8
Southward, Melvin F.
Southward, Beverly J.
~0755 La Colima Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
Hillin, William D.
Hillin, Luana D.
40715 La Colima Rd.
Elias, Hector
Elias, Helen
~0665 La Colima Rd.
Cooper, David
Cooper, Dianne
,0625 La Colima Rd.
26
24
22
20
Downs, George
Downs, Queen Ester
A'0575 La Colima Rd.
49
Mission Chrysler Plymouth Inc.
298 N. Azusa Ave
West Covina, CA 91791
921080040-6
Cambray, Micha~'L~l'ie '
Cambray, Chriszopher Brian
Great Tree
Nottingham Fee Ln Blewbury
Didcot Oxon Oxll 9PG Englan
~ancho Calif Water
P.O. Box 174
Temecula, CA 92390
911180019-u
Heberle, jack
Compton, jeffrey
P.O. Box 1152
Temecula, CA 92390
913250020-5
Blair inv Corp
Heberle, Jack i.
29377 Rancho Ca!if Rd
Temecula, CA 92390
913260031-5
Pike, Audrey S.
102 S. Por:o!a Ln
Tustin, CA 92680
91904i004-6
13
13
36
16
Epperson, Roger W.
28465 Fron; Szree; No. 113
Temecula, CA 92390
919042002-7
Tomond Prop
C/O Terration Corp
P.O. Box 2159
Escondido, CA 92025'
9210800~1-7
48
54
Coop, Donald W.
Coop, Jennean
P.O. Box 1234
Temecula, CA 92390
92108004~-0
Rancho Calif Dairy Assoc No. 2
C/O Rancho Calif. Prop
29400 Rancho California Rd
~"~ncho California CA 923 0
30
General Telephone Co of Calif
1 GTE P1 RC 3521
Thousand Oaks. CA 91362
919051010-2
47
Worldwide Executive Prop Inc.
40274 Paseo Sereno
Rancho California Dairy Assoc.
29~00 Rancho California Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390 0 8
921090 07-
42
Royfin NV
10960 Wilshire Blvd. No. 2224
Los Angeles, CA 90024
921090016-6
911170011-5 9
Day Bar.I
C/O California Communities, Inc
12520 High Bluff Dr. No. 300
San Diego, CA 92130
Downs, George
Downs, Queen Es:er
40575 La Colima Rd
Parker, Leon
Parker, Bari
40550 La Colima Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
9190,3001-9
Canevari, Paul A.
Canevari, Ingrid B.
29720 Valle Verde Rd.
Temecula, CA 92390
919051001-~
Holchak, Vic:or A.
Holchak, Noma
1602 W. 65th St.
Los A~zeles, CA 900~7
18
3~
33
140
Studer, Francois D
28306 Borgona
MissiOn Viejo, CA 92692
911130021-0
Ms:'sin, Mr & Brown Fred
n Pembroke
P.O. Box 619
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
911130023-2
Tekunoff, William
Tekunoff, Betty
8441 Yarrow St
Rosemead, CA 91770
911150006-9
Gallion, Mary M
901 Motto Bay Blvd No 33
Morro Bay, CA 93442
0
911160 05-9
120
139
Roripaugn, Leo E
Roripaug~, Marjan E
P.O. Box 2
Temecula, CA 92390
911160027-9
Roripaugh, Leo
.-Roripaugh, Marian
.O Box 2
femecula, CA 92390
911160029-1
12
Day Bar I
C/O Calif Communities Inc
12520 High Bluff Dr No 300
San Diego, CA 92130
91117000 6tl
14
Day BAr I
C/O Calif .Communities, Inc
12520 High Bluff Dr No 300
San Diego, CA 92130
911170008-3
57
James L & Mary A Ramsay
P.O. Box 52
Temecula, CA 92390
910-130-002
Randall Home
Home Welding
P.O. box 791
mecula, CA
92390
0 0
91-130-0 2
Jim McGell
Rancho Muffler Specialist
27590 Jefferson Ave
Temecula, CA 92390
57
57
Dez.n x & Connie M Hill
27622 Jefferson Ave
Temecula, CA 92390
910-130-003
Connie M. Hill
27622 Jefferson Ave
Temecula, CA 92390
910-130-004
55
56
Temecula Animal Medical Center
27622 Jefferson Ave
Temecula, CA 92390
910-130-003
93
Hobie Rawlings Investment Co
26820 Jefferson Ave
Murrieta, CA 92362
910-200-001
MDC Calif
C/O L J Cornick
9699 Tierra Grande St
San Diego, CA 92126
910-200-022
Jeffrey Compton
P.O. Box 1152
Temecula, CA 92390
913-260-018
148
131
Ventura Pacific Capital Co
340 Rosewood AVe Ste D
Camarillo, CA 93011
910-200-028
147
Kulberg Ltd
27710 Jefferson Ave No 310
Temecula, CA 92390
9110150-016
137
Kulberg Ltd
27710 Jefferson Ave No 301
Temecula, CA 92390
911-160-020
136
John E Roripaugh
Box 203
Temecula, CA 92390
911-170-009
ll
John E Roripaugh
June R Tull
P.O.,Box 2
Temecula, CA 92390
lO
John E Roripaugh
June R Tull
P.O. Box 2
Temecula, CA 92390
911-180-014
Lawrence & Paula Murphy
30326 Calle Halcon
Temecula, CA 92390
913-260-017
13C
52
Advanced Cardiovascular Syst
26531 Ynez Rd
Temecula, CA 92390
921-080-036
53
Advanced Cardiovascular Syst
26531 Ynez Rd
Temecula, Ca 92390
921-080-038
51
Advanced Cardiovascular Syst
26531 Ynez Rd
Temecula, CA 92390
921-080-037
Key Comm Corp
P.O. Box 7556
San Jose, CA 95150
921-080-038
53
Perry Norris Corp
567 San Nicolas Dr #306
Newport Beach, CA 92660
921-080-038
53
Orient U S Leasing Corp
P.O. Box 3985
San Francisco, CA 94119
921-080-038
53
53
Advanced Cardiovascular Sys
26531 Ynez Rd
Temecula, CA 92390
921-080-038
41
Rancho Solana Assoc
Won Sang & Insook Yoo
5473 Kearny Villa Rd 210
San Diego, CA 92123012
921-090-
38
Meadowview Community Assoc 1
P.O. Box 788
Temecula, CA 92390
921-090-018
M & J Ramsay Corp
Box .
Temecula, CA 92390
910130016-9
61
M & J Ramsay Corp
=ox 4
Temecula, CA 92390
910130020-2
94
Stretch Partners
P.O. Box 686
Murrieta, CA 92362
910200032-9
Cooksey, James D.
23191 Peralta Dr
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
910200036-3
95
Hobie'Designs Inc.
35605 Beach Rd-
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624
910200047-3
98
M & J Ramsay Corp
Box 4
Temecula, CA 92390
910130021-3
Tierra Silverado Ltd
C/O Tierra Financial Inc
3325 Adams Ave
San Diego, CA 92116
910200033-0
910200046-2
Walsh, Harold
Walsh, Rosemarie
C/O R P McAlister
25725 Hayes
Murrieta, CA 92362
Schostag, Robert
Schostag, Eleanor B
14621 Holt Ave
Tustin, CA 92680
910200048-4
Asano, Hideo
469 Ena Rd No 2304
Honolulu, HI 96815
910200051-6
96
97
99
154
909120020-18'
Rancho Calif Indus Complex
Rancho Calif Indus Assoc
C/O William Johnson
P.O. Box 1027
Temecula, CA 92390
85
Rancho Calif Indus Complex
P.O. Box 1027
Rancho California, CA 923[
909120022-3
Rancho Core Assoc No 1
P.O. Box 1075
Temecula, CA 92390
90912002~-5
83
76
Gilbert, Gary
Gilbert, Irene
2440 Camino Rey
Fullerton, CA 92633
909270012-8
Riverside County Flood Cont
P.O. Box 1033
Riverside, CA 92502
90927001~-0
910200049-5 100
Barkley, Matt A.
_-~Webb, Tanneke j.
/O Harold Brown
5729 Madrid Ln
Long Beach, CA 90802
Port, Norman
Port, Marlene
~ Jib St No. 16
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
910200055-0
Port, Norman
Port, Marlene
4 Jib St No 16
Marina Del Rey, CA 90202
910200057-2
Port, Norman
Port, Marlene
a Jib St No. 16
Maraina Del Rey, CA 90292
910200062-6
M & J Ramsay Corp
Box 4
.~Temecula, CA 92390
910130017-0
155
157
159
64
M & J Ramsay Corp
Box 4
Temecula, CA 92390
910130019-2
60
Port, Norman
Port, Marlene
4 Jib St No 16
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
910200056-1
Kuzmanic, Joseph J
Kuzmanic, Kirk
1250 Pacific Coast Hwy
Wilmington, CA 90744
910200061-5
Port, Norman
Port, Marlene
4 Jib St No. 16
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
910200063-7
Pascoe, William T
William T Pascoe 3rd
P.O. Box 2550
Newport Beach, CA 92660
909070006-5
Pascoe, William T.
P.O. Box 2550
Newport Beach, CA 92663
909110005-7
Diaz Road Inv
C/O PM Prop Man
27840 Del Rio Rd Ste C
Temecula, CA 92390
156
158
16o
91
9O
89
Blackmore, Kenneth J
Blackmore, Terry J
42181 Avertida Alvarado
Temecula, CA 92390
909270016-2
Coop, Donald
Coop, Jonnean
45150 Via Vaquero
Temecula, CA 92390
909270018-4
Cherry Partners Ltd
30137 Mira Loma Dr
Temecula, CA 92390
909070008-7
72
7O
92
88
Diac Road Inv
C/O PM Prop Mgt
27840 Del Rio Rd Ste C
Temecula, CA 92390
909120019-1
86
Rancho Calif Indus Complex
Rancho Calif Indus Assoc
P.O. Box 1027
Temecula, CA 92390
909120021-2
84
Rancho Calif Indus. Complex i
P.O. Box 1027
Rancho California, CA 9239(
909120023-4
Rancho Core Assoc No l
P.O. Box 1075
Temecula, CA 92390
909120025-6
Rancho Calif Water Dist
P.O. Box 174
Temecula, CA 92390
910110010-1
Channell Commercial Corp
620 W Foothill Blvd
Glendora, CA 91740
910110043-1
Schoerfler Robert J
~choeffler, David A
41890 S Enterprise Cir
Temecula, CA 92390
909270013-9
Varela, Ron
Varela Cristy
109 N Maple Ste K
Corona, CA 91720
909270015-1
Press Enterprise Co
3512 14th St-
Riverside, CA 92501
909270017-3
Winchester Auto Partners
6150 Farrow Ste H
Carlshad, CA 92009
909270019-5
909270020-5
Atkinson, William
Atkinson Robert E
-~'/O Creative'Blends Inc
.O. Box 851
Placentia, CA 92670
Coop, Donald
Coop, Jennean
P.O. Box 1234
Temecula, CA
9239O
909270022-7
Kay, Arnold
Kay, Vicki
5512 Voletta P1
North Hollywood, CA 91607
909270024-9
David Lowry
27715 Jefferson Ste 202
Temecula, CA 92390
909270032-6
Lowry, David
27715 Jefferson Ste 202
Temecula, CA 92390
909270037-1
74
73
71
68
80
78
67
66
150
Windsor Prtners Winchester High
29377 Rancho Calif Rd
Temecula, CA 92390
910110039-8
910120003-6
Blake, Joseph
Stephens, Albert D
C/O A D Stephens
P.O. Box 6324
San Pedro, CA 90734
Reeves, Donna Lee
P.O. Box 1524
Temecula, CA 92390
910130012-5
59
909270021-6
Foli, Victor
Foli, Billie J
C/O Foli Family Trust
~718 Via Tola
Fallbrook, CA 92028
Press Enterprises Co
3512 14th St
Riverside, CA 92501
909270023-8
79
Omdahl, Howard L
Omdahl, Debra K
801 Shade Tree Ln
Fallbrook, CA 92028
909270025-0
Lowry, David
27715 Jefferson Ste 202
Temecula, CA 92390
909270036-0
77
65
Kemp, Karl
Kemp, Edeltraut
234 Flower ST
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
910100006-7
Rancho Calif Water Dist
P.O. Box 174
Temecula, CA 92390
910110008-0
103
Nelson, Dorothy
Nelson, Robert A
6737 Vesper Ave
Van Nuys, CA 91405
910120007-0
M & J Ramsay
P. O. Box 4
Temecula, CA 92390
910130013-6
15
58
Griffin Stephen Stanley
Griffin Alan Miles
321 San Colla St
La Jolla, CA 92037
911150005-8
Roripaugh, Leo E
Roripaugh, Marjan E
P.O. Box 2
Temecula, CA 92390
911150007-0
Roripaugh, Leo
Roripaugh, Marjan
P.O. Box 2
Temecula, CA 92390
911150012-5
1
Roripaugh, Leo
Roripaugh, Marjan
P.O. Box 2
Temecula, CA 92390
911160028-0
8
Day Bar I
C/O Callf Communities Inc
12520 High Bluff Dr No 300
San Diego, CA 92130
911160030-1
13
Day Bar I
C/0 Calif Communities Inc
12520 High Bluff Dr No 300
San Diego, CA 92130
911170007-2
116
Jaim. Terrence
34990 Orange
Wlldomar, CA 92395
911130016-6
910100009-0
Blake, Joseph
Willi~s, Richard +J.
C/O Gerald Garrett
1766 Maplewood
Orange, CA 92665
104
County of Riverside
3133 7th St
Riverside, CA 92507
919119933-2
149
114
Williamson, Frances Eliz
328 37th Ave S W
· Calgary ALB CAN T2S OV2
911130019-9
Rancho Calif Water Dist
P.O. Box 174
Temeeula, CA 92390
911180007-2
Margarita Prop
23530 Via Los Flores
Murrieta, CA 92362
913260019-5
132
913260030-4
Blake, Joseph R.
Stephens, Albert D.
C/O A D S e hens
P.o. Box
San Pedro, CA 90734
Woods, George M.
Woods, Leslie F.
29615 Valle Olivera
Deleon, Raymond E.
Deleon, Aria M.
40435 Calle Madero
Temecula, CA 92390
919042001-6
McMillan, Patrick L.
McMillan, Vikki
40495 Calle Madero
Temecula, CA 92390
919042003-8
Slater, Edmond Motdell
Slater Alene Melton
26272 6th
Highland, CA 92346
919042005-0
Klotsas, George M.
Klotsas, Leah D.
P.O. Box 922
Glendale, CA 91209
919043002-0
Suovanen, Thomas M.
Suovanen, Debra M.
29715 Valle Verde
?emecula, CA 92390
919-51008-1
Royfin, N V
10960 Wilshire Blvd No 2224
Los Angeles, CA 90024
921090022-1
134
37
15
17
19
35
32
White, Kenneth Warren
White, Gall Ellen
29573 Avenida Del Sol
Temecula, CA 92390
Port, Norman
Port, Marlene
4 Jib St No. 16
Signal Dev Corp
17890 Skypark Cir
Irvine, CA 92714
910240014-7
161
101
Heberle, Jack
Compton, Jeffrey
P.O. Box 1152
Temecula, CA 92390
911060008-3
Moore, Claris M.
P.O. Box 1083
Crescent City, CA 95531
911110007-6
107
105
122
McAsh, Charlotte
H Pembroke
P.O. Box 619
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
911120015-4
911120017-6 124
Alfaro, Jose A.
Roger, David J.
C/O Ernst Loelkes
29921 Villa Alturas
Temecula, CA 92390
911120019-8 126
Cambray, Michael Leslie
Cambray, Christopher Brian
Great Tree
Nottingham Fee Ln Blewbury
Didcot Oxon Oxll 9PG England
128
Holt, Harold
2525 S W Marine Dr
Vancouver BC CAN V6P 6C3
911120021-9
Moore, Gilbert S.
5481 Calle Ocho
Carpinteria, CA 93013
911130004-5
108
Hewitt
Montreal Tr Co
466 Howe St
Vancouver BC CAN V6C2A8
911130013-3
Signal Dev Corp
17890 SkyparK Cir
Irvine, CA 92714
910240002-6
Heberle, Jack
Compton, Jeffrey
P.O. Box 1152
Temecula, CA 92390
911050006-0
Heberle, Jack
Compton, Jeffrey
P.O. Box 1152
Temecula, CA 92390
911100005-3
Finlay, Catherine M
603 Trinity Ct
Dixon, CA 95620
911120014-3
123
Schramm, April
Schramm, Roy
10427 Ditson St
Sunland, CA 91040
911120016-5
Kirkpatrick, Thomas E.
Kirkpatric, Kathy S
2028 Notre Dame
Barsrowe, CA 92311
911120020-8
Griffith, Reed O
Reed O Griffith
609 W Sierra No 108
Fresno, CA 93704
911130003-4
Montgomery, Mary A.
P.O. Box 533
Homeland, CA 92348
911130005-6
Blake, Joseph R
Stephens, AlberS D
P.O. Box 6324
San Pedro, CA 90734
911130014-4
1C
12
lO
12
12
10(
11(
112
· dVE'-DEDE coun
PLAnninG DEPaq;ITiEi
APPLICATION FOR LAND UIE AND DM LOPMENT
DATE: ~une 16, 1989
0 PUILCUIIPERMn'NO. ,
DtRACtlIId~NO. _,_,_
O TI~R,',qYUSIPINMffNO. · · ,
i ~.;'
DWqtUiC!NCX . , . . .
~L", ....~ - -
'E'
1, &Yt rename: R~FO~ pROpE!fi'ZgS, INC,
tdjaqW: ~..271o5 Xnez Road Rancho CaZirornla, Ca 93390
teiall~neNck: f ?lq I 676-.S6~11 leJw.-llml
t O,m~Neme: sam as above
Telmmm~ W{t: ( I t IJL-I IuaJ
MI~A~U': u...~aq .T,rre~,wnn. '~'~F ll~ lqanchn Cal4[a"'nZa, CA 93t90
TelllieNs: I ?rob I i~?d~-vvln IIBJL-IILI~I
l. IIAIIJKt
1. peelem ofllNoom(I Fole~l:lOmbeMeMImf. eo.I
ii~z'ova~ or !Wvlsod rentatSve Parcel Map 23e30
I- Imemmlmi~m_.l,..e:.r. mmmmmmmm: 41emm~
Im~J~uc ot ~.w~.*]a lloml, lim-Ux~c ot
· &. _ ' ' emma: aa,0?t ac2,es
IIKa ~k - mmmlmgmt.emwY~r,k,.mmalmmm,mOImmfleCeemW~MmYIramere
I. ThenmlmewsPeeeNe. amiC ,:' ' ~ 125 !)-1,
IINATIII II ImlI:MtlITYOIIIRIll
4010 LEe STREET, I"' FtOOR
NVEIqSfDF... CALIFOmiI&
INOtO, GAI, IFOmlL~ Illc
IIIOUIIIID PROPERTY OWNEH8 NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
AJi~llNFOR: NaGELM Ikl0FLDTIIL~Rmmw~EmMmdmie
~0idg 'Cf V.k~Jt8 - teemme: I
~fL'~ UM PfmdrTS VANANCES
MiMe INII~Y CONMIJelON IVITIM
Theimmmq memmdllm mmelme mme lmm ei lmeO ef lm mvw noMmee % ~ --t ore:
1. TWOldmMiiniMi~tmilebmmMiemem lli'X¶I~'immMIeMi~..TmeeemmeMIMmieme~iB
memeeililmwemlmk:meilehellemmiimleilMe:
:' V'I
b. AMImellem 'A ~ - i.fik. illlabedm.
Onelllm41wllelellmmlnlineef.
II. OllllllmlIwIlmewll~.
e. I~llLANODfVll;ONGllllOMkV:Amh-xS1-memmeedmeWnmammmm.
3~ Cln' tm'~lm, metmmmmmst~.enlmer.ermlmtthemIMllmommimeMmlmmm~e.TheTaa~l~
PROPERTY OWNERI CERTIFICATION
~8765 lln~le Omk Drive
..m,p:bo Ca:tarorn~., Cl..9,2)9o
1.__989 . OAIE: ....
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
PlmmmmmPmftmlmndUdiNmgmmmmmlmmlldNmmddllommlmm4~mummmdlnPmPim. Wm~m~y
1. WimtlmthmTelmlaimdmd? kQ.0?
I. Illalmedmm4'p(' Yio~ilefthmmmmmmdl8? YEIC) NOB
Z NUmimmmmmmmmmyemmutomemmmmiNmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~.)
Irasurf u: IA,mi,a....m~dml
1. Iml~mlmmmmQmm~mmmll~N~m~m~aV 1475t Ilmmm~kldimZ, mm? I'EIC)
TedMmwdmmlyeeflmmimleetllleeBtedlmlmllmB(lituillmeZoNLemmllmmklkk ...
Mlllm~VZmme Mapl mvNiltle ltthe PMIdiG II fl .. -" mm, Gmmmm efilm lmmmieg Omi m~m.4.1nhe mmemet mwlmm m
8mo. m~wto O~fd?.l. mei~lheNl~wllt gte MNUil~.
IfstmdhamimeonmemmV. mammok~x.~,qV~motWeeNmyee..cp"
tho mem mm mm foen. WseWee of me ..-i '~.,f, mMa mgud. ems mev of me ee~mmemfon~
& tmtmmPmmjmmm mMmlnm hmmaqlmmhmgemmmmmmor,~ .*~ m*m~mmmmmmmmmmmmmofmm'lemmmSmmmy~m-
memTeclmmllleeefr? ~l NOD
T~dmiemwm~mmieemimmmmbmeitm)tmm9eei~icmmmimdmmkmmmyevemmmmidmmm~em~ab1Y&kieh
EilmmmTeeNeiReemo(elmevNIIbleetmelmlmbl;k.k.... V.'m,~GommMmeltlmPammqOlll.k,/em.
ItoNmueftoQumboeells'Ym.'emthoem,dM:~.'L~e6ooF~Pt~Ymmleeboetodim4,g
mmmmmmmmWmitmmMMmmmkk,.,;dmeymmgmmemmemmmdmmemm,mmmmmmmqemm~mmmmWmumgmMmmemm
llelmlldvll~OifiolSilllndioemiRkellldeedllPeddelmemmelthiff...
lyommmNmmmlmmmlmmmmtoNmmmm~lummm~mdmmtmNmmmmedmmmm$1mma,4m~em.~d' T'D~lNIoWtorme~tio~ld.'
W0mmmmmdmo. mmmmmmmummmmmmmmmmmeorm~tKY~r~
4. tmummmmmm~mmmmmmwmmemmmlmmmm? ~TI~ NOD
rNm?mmmmmmmmemummmmm(m) mmmmmmmWmmemmmmmmMm?
Id,mmmlmdmmmmmmmmm
!"ror~dmd b7 Ikmm:mbo CLl.&rm, mm~ iim~- D~mtr2~
'FIMIl'il:AddllmelMIMdde
IbeblmlammmlmMadluetmlme:
tNIlei~(lllvl-_ 'kWm, Ro$'Mi ItldefplallellmPmle~el~wmamlelllmlollthede. WeelefleeeelmP
mmlmmmmmm"
· ltmmmmlmtmm,mkmmmmm~m4~_ ~mmtmmmm
k 'rlmmmmdmdmSm~A, ~
ZAdee/eVmnp~,Ofawekdleeel4efee,e~ ,,,,m'~mmpmlimemmmU.l. QmVeiXVkneyl .'Y....,~mmmem
· eldlnllMlu.
leeelyltetlili~ ~ig ~ltllMMelMmliIMIItndllndlMefammmtmeNi~togemlff
' vk&m
REOUIRED PROPERTY OWNERI NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
AP~ICJkTIO NS FOR:
PARCEL MAPS
TRACTS
ZONE CHANGES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
PUBLIC USE PERMITS
SURFACE MINING leEliMITS
tARND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM
Thelollow~dlemsdtneeeweedellfwlimeollibeOolllweboeeemedcaleefgitVW:
Jr -!l MN fog.}
re. Alf~,r'e,,ot the WeaA. eN4refilel~.
e. FOllLANDDIVIIIONCASESONLY:Anr~'X 11'elNtN~alfftelenleMlelD.
2. Four ~ am ol gummeff aabe~. al ff~e 81~.mt owaef .eegewee .encl tNxmnIMNe web Nit eelrig M~'esse s. D ·
MCkueN:decme~etseemNai:da~end~weef~e4c~et~N~Nee.~ieee~iedd~eNiee~ed~n~MMf4eed~M~a
PROPERTY OWNERI CERTIFICATION
Sb~lton Janiko~ski June 19, 1989
I. . ¢eedy that aft
tee,e, , ,;- ..
3.F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
the Mtachee peoeeny oemees bSl was Werate~ tW ....
Mmeeeeeee,-,e-e,,,eeeamme
r''~iip~e~i~te;~e~d~te~'~p~pe~nd~f'i~4~ef1y~e~tee~1s'~Me3~ee~N~~m~
tie ~ iS ~ Mimes Ihe letter e,~_,,,~_,eO ~sleslmeN n
111'LEIREalSTRATION: .
PleONE:
Shelion Jenikovski
Asst Planner/J.F.bvLdson
27349 Jefferson Ave Ste
bnchoCalifornia, C& 92390
(714) 676-7710
taall.-ill,laJ
cAe:
-.V[ iDE councP
-PLAnnine DEPAmnERC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBER: .~)~ ~ c/.~ MODULE NUM.~BER(s):
PROJECT CASE TYPE(S)AND NUMBERS:
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPA .: .
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
STANDARD EVALUATION
DESCRIPTION (include proposed minimum lot size end uses as mpplicabte~.*'F'~n
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES
C. ASSESSOWS PARCEL NO.(s): q
; or SQUARE FEET
D. EXISTINGZONING:
E. PROPOSEDZONING: N/t-?
F. STREET REFERENCES:
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
IS THE ,,~~~N CONFORMANCE?
He
BRIEF DE~RlfflON OF ~E ~ISTING E~RONMEffiAL S~ING OF THE ~~ S~ AND ffS SURROUNDINGS
II. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check the appropriate option(s) below end proceed accordingly. ~ a ~
are ' t°J'
~I*AII or part of the Droject site is in "Adol:)ted Specific Plans," "R P or "Rancho Villages Commun
Policy Areas". Complete Sections III, N (B and C only), V end VI.
:p AII or girt of the project site is in "Ames Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections IIi, IV
(A, B and D only), V and VI.
r-! All or part of the project site has an Open SDace and Conservation designation other than those mentioned
above. Complete Sections III, IV (A, B, end E only), V end VI.
295-1'0 (New 12~87'
III. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES Ag'C;:sa~MENT
A. ~ndicate~hena~re~fffepr~p~sed~andu~sde~erminedfromthec~e~cri~ti~nsu~undinC~mprehen~ve~P~anFigure
VL3 (Circle One~ This information is necessary to cl~tr.,,,ine the 8pproWiste land use suital~lity ratings i.n .~v-H,,,n Pl, B
NA - NOt AppliCJb~ CrtticaJ Ellenti81 tlo.,,,l' Iligh Risk ( Normal-Low Ris'~_-
B. ~nC~k~ew~th8ye~(Y)~rn~(N)whether~nye~vir~nm~tih~rd~nd/~rre~um~i~Je~rn~y~igni~cant~y~ect~rbea~ected
by the propolaL All referenced figures eta conflirted in the Co,,,p,'c.henlivt ~ Plln. For any illue mekecI yes (Y) write
Idditionll cIIts sources, agencies cortlulted, ~ncling~ of faot Ind Imy, ,ltljglti0n ~ under Section V. AIm), where indicated.
HAZARDS
I__/V Alcluist-Prioto SpecjaJ Studies or County Fault 12./V ~ Noie (Fig. !1.18.5, 11.18.11
(Fig. Vl.1) & VL12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.B.)
U R (Fig. VL3) ~ A B C D (Fig, Vl.11 )
ng~0Tine i~ Vl. 1)R (F~g Vl /%/E;se (Fig. Vl. 13- Vl. 16)
2._>/__ cti Pot ntiaJ Zone (Fig. Vt.1)Cr---ql~-~'lll~,~13.
NA ndsSha . .~ A B C D (Fig, Vl.11 )
3..~/_ ~ ki (F 14./xi ' way Noise (Fig. VI.17 - VI.29)
S PS U R (Fig. VI.5) J C D (Fig, VI.11 )
4-/V Slopes (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope MBDs) 15./"( i
No A n
'~tic Maps or On-site Inspection) 16. __
6. i'~ fall S PS U R (Fig. VI.6)
Hazard (On-site Inspection) 17.
7./J Expansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil 18./'
Conservation Service Soil Surveys) 19./'/
8- / / Erosion (U.S.D.A. Soil Q:H'mervation 20. ~
Service Soil Surveys) 21.
9-/%/ Wind Ersosion & Blowsand (Fig. VI.1, 22.
Ord. 460, Sec. 14.2 & Ord. 484) 23.
10./~J Dam Inundation Area (Fig. VI.7) 24.
11 ~ (~plains (Fig. VI.7) 25.
U R (Fig. VI.8)
Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. Vl.11 )
Noise Sensitive Project (Fig. Vl.11 )
Air Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Air Quality
Water Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Water Quality
Hazardous Matedls and Wastes
Hazardous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - VI.31 )
Other
Other
(Riv. Co. Agricultural land Conversation
Contract Maps)
Wildlife (Fig. %/I.36 - %/I.37)
Vegetation (Fig. VI.38 - VI.40)
Mineral Resources (Fig. VI.41 - VI.42)
Energy Resources (Fig. VI.43 - VI.44)
',,L,-tS'- eliSi Die sl'o-le
$~nie Highwayl (Fig. VI.45}
Hislorie 1:!~oure~ (FiO. ~.82 - V1.33}
(F't. VI.S~ - ~.~ & ~.,t6 - Vl.4~}
PaleontOtogical Resources
(Paleontological Resources Map)
Offer
Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally SuitaDle
U - Generally Unsuitable R - Restricted A - Generally Acceptable
B - Conditionally Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable D - Land Use Discouraged
395-70 (New 12/87t
LAND USE DETERMINATION
CornDe ~is part unless the ¢.~ject is located in "Adopted Specific Plans", "REMAP" or "Rancho
V'dlages Community Policy Areas."
sP^c ONS .V^T,O. MAP
3. SUBAREA, IF ANY: / ~./-ljz-x-4 * ~ -
4. COMMUNITY POUCY AREA, IF ANY:
COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY:
St}MMARY OF POLICIES AFFECTING PROPOSAL:
For all projects, inidcate with a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or NNViCeS issues may significantly affect
or be affected by the prolx~al. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Ran. For any issue
marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consuited, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section V.
PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
1 ._.y._ Circulation (Fig. IV.l-IV.11. Discuss in 10-
Sec. V Existing, Ranned & Recluired Roads)
Bike Trails (Fig. IV. 12 - IV. 13)
Water (Agency Letters)
Sewer (Agency Letters)
Fire Services (Fig. IV. 16 - IV. 18)
Sheriff Services (Fig IV.17 - IV. 18)
,Schools(Fig. IV.17- IV. 18)
Solid VVaste (Fq). W.17 - IV. 18)
Parks and Recreation (F'~I. IV.19 - IV.20)
e
3.~
4. 'Y
5.7
6,/Y
15./
16-Y
17-N
Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV. 19 - IV,24/
Riv, Co. 800 Scale Ecluestrian Trail Ma~s)
Utilities (Fig, IV,25 - W,26)
Libraries (Fig. W.17- N. 18)
Healffi Services (Fig. IV.17 - IV. 18)
Airports (Fig. 11,18,2 - 11.18.4,
11.18.8 - 11,18.10 & N.27 - IV.36)
City 0~1,,,,~
Other
C. If all or part of the project is located in "Adol}ted Specific Plans", "REMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community Policy
1. Slate the roterant land use designation(s):
2. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consistent with the policies and designations of the appropriate document.
and therefore consistent with the Comprohensive General Plan? If not, explain:
(New 12/81)
N. LAND USE DETERMINATION (continued)
D. ff all or part of the project site is in "Areas not Designated as Open Space", and is not in a Community Ran, comOlete
questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete Questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in a Community Ran.
1. Land use category(ies) necessary to support the proposed_ project. Also indicate land use type
(Le. residential, commercial, etc.) ~
r (; 'T'r-_
3. If D.1 differs from D.2, will the difference be raeolved at the deve~ mage? Explain:
4. Community Plan designation(s): (q ~ ('/.T'vTv~,~. ~.(_.<'~, / .)
5. is the proposed project consistent with the i:K)licies and designations of the Community Plan?
If not, explain: L/~. ~-
6. IS the proposal compatible with existing and proposed surrounding land uses?
ff not, explain: L'C~-t-'L/
Based on this initial study, is the prolx~al consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
If not, reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies:
E. if all or part of the project site is in Ol~m Space and Conservation designation, complete the following:
1. State the designation(s):
2. is the proposal consistent with the nation(s)? ff not, explain:
3. Based on this initial study, is the proposal sisent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
issues identifying inconsistencies:
ff not, reference by Section and
295-70 fNew 12/871
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MF./3URES
A. ADDmONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
SECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION DETBqlIIATION
ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED (YES/NOJ)ATE}
B. For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and IV.B, identify the Section and issue number and do the
following, in the format as shown below:
1. Lilt all additional relevant data sources, including agencies consulted.
2. State 811 findings of fact regarding environmental cortcems.
3. Stale specific mitigation measures, if identifiable without requiring an environmental impact report (E.I.R.)
4. ff additional information is recluired before the environmental asaesmnent can be completed, refer to
Subsection A.
5. If additional sheets are needed to complete this section, check the box at the end of the section and attach
the necessary sheets.
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
I t l
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (continue)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
:,,~.~:~:.~ ~: . .
,
k ,-~- W~' ":'
~,4 ~ ,L'~ ~.Z~.~. ~d~~:~ 7Zc.~,~
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
lNrolect will not have · significant effect on the environment end 8 Negative Declaration may be
(or)
[] The project could have a elgnific, imt effect on fie environment; however, there will not be a significant
effect in this oa~e because the mitigation measures described in Section V have been applied to the
project and a Negative Declaration may be preparecl.
(or)
11 The project may have a significant effect on the environment ancl an Environmental Impact Report
is required. '~ ,. / ' C. /
~,,.,= ,,~,"~d',,,, c,., ..2' .,'
~ by
295-10 file, 12/87i
A GENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER
JULY 31, 1990 - 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTA 7IONS/
PROCLAMATION$
PUBLIC COMMENTS
r~en, f~USlN;SS
Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks, Birdsall
Anoeal Procedures - CRn Rates end Charges
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Direct the City Manager to implement the procedures outlined in
the staff report for evaluating appeals filed regarding the CSD
City-wide rates and charges.
MANA OER$ REPORT
DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting:
August 14, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB# TITLE: DEPT HD
MTG: 7-31-90 Procedure for Evaluating TCBD CITY ATTY
DEPT: C,M, Rates and Charges Appeals CITY MGR ~
Prepared by Deputy City Clerk June Greek
RECOMMENDA T/ON:
That the Community Services District Board of Directorrs review the procedures
recommended by staff for implementation during the evaluation of appeals filed in
connection with the levy of TCSD rates and charges. That if these recommendations
meet with the Council's approval the City Manager be directed to implement the
procedures during his review of the appeal forms submitted by the property owners.
BACKGROUND:
During the Public Hearing held before the Community Services District Board of
Directors on July 24, 1990, I was asked to develop procedures for dealing with a
number of appeal criteria which were discussed during the hearing. Listed below are
the issues and the suggested policy/procedure which I feel is fair and reasonable in
each case.
Private Parks - Within the City there are a number of subdivisions who
have private parks within the boundaries of that community. Since
these park lands are owned and maintained from funds collected from
the homeowners association members it is my feeling that the present
vacant residential and/or vacant non-residential rates may be excessive.
Since these are private parks, not open for use by the general public, I
feel that some assessment for city-wide recreation is appropriate.
Recommendation: Apply the agricultural land-use rate of $16.70 per acre.
Ooen Soace Areas - A second category of land owned and maintained
by homeowners is open space that, for a variety of reasons, can not be
used for any other purpose. An example of this would be the riparian
area along Pechanga Creek.
Recommendation: Place this land in an exempt category.
Agenda Report
TCSD Appeal Procedure
Page 2.
Agricultural Land - Since agricultural uses vary significantly depending on the
type of crop and growing method, I feel that the large land farmers who are
required to have sizable acreage should be given special consideration.
Recommendation: Assessment should be based on $16.70 per acre for
agricultural land, with a designated maximum number of acres subject to
charges. Council may wish to establish a 25 acre maximum for such cases.
Mobile Home Park Sites - It appears that the County has placed Mobile Home
Parks in a land use designation for non-residential (improved). Since this
assessment will be billed to the owner of the Park, who presumedly will pass
this cost on to the tenants, an adjustment may be in order.
Recommendation: Base the total assessment on the number of spaces in the
!}ark at $25.05 per space. This is the assessment applied to apartments and
condominiums.
Golf Courses - Currently the County land use category for courses such as the
Temecula Creek Inn is vacant industrial/commercial for the entire parcel. Since
much of this acreage is in open space and recreational use we believe an
adjustment should be made.
Recommendation: All acreage used for golf should be assessed at the
agricultural rate of $16.70. All acreage used for hotel/motel, restaurant, club
house, and parking should be assessed at the non-residential (improved) rate
of $200.40 per acre.
Hardship Criteria - This criteria seems to fall into the areas of the elderly and
handicapped property owners who are on fixed incomes.
Recommendation: Establish an annual fixed income level of $12,000 or less
to qualify for a deferment of the assessment.
FISC,4L IMPA C T:
Unknown at this time.