HomeMy WebLinkAbout070390 CC AgendaInvocation
Flag Salute
9rd~O~nc~$ No.
George Si~aons
T~cula Valley House of Praise
90-10
90-68
Z~OZ, Z, CALb:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz,
Parks
·
P-'~TXONS
Certificate of Appreci&tion
Douq Davies
Frank Aleshire
.A.~t_o?&l of. !S _~inut.e.S i. p.z'ovided sO members Of the l:)t~bli¢ can
;enda' ~ers are li~t~ tO
-~ co ~e C ''
"~ '~ ~e c~y c~e~~ ~o~ s~ou~ ~ t~22~ out
You ~e Call~ to
cow m c)ASHRal
Approve t~he minutes of June 19, 1990 as mailed.
~ U fown.t ~ Ro~d.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Along Y~e= Rn§d N9rth ~f Rancho
Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RBSOLUTTOM MO. 90-
e
Ap)?w'ov.,ql of ~td No. 6-90 - C4tv M~r~agv's Vghlcle
RECO!.-d~DATION:
3.1
Authorize City Manager to accept best low bid
submitted by DeAnza Chevrolet Ln ~le amount of
$20,485.63, including tax and license.
Maps 21675 e~d 21675-6
It~COMMENDATION:
4.!
Approve Final Tract Maps 21675 and21675-6, subject
to ~e conditions of approval.
C~ty Co,,nc:i'l As_erda
~-]y 3, ~990
V~,c~t4on of a Port4on of ~ercedes
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Approve vacating a por~ion of Mercedes Street
subject to reservation mf easements for public
utility purposes and further subject to obtaining
an access easement from the State of California
over the easterly half of Mercedes Street.
OOUNC?T. RUmTN,~SS
6. O~d T9v~H~lto~io ~eViev ~POCed,'PeL.And RecoBiLtR.d.S~4on~
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve the Planning Co~lseion Recommendations as
follows:
Review of development proposals and property
alterations within the Temecula Historic
Preservation District for historic
appropriateness should be incorporated into
the City's development review process as soon
as possible.
The City'should re-establish full membership
for the Temecula Historic Review through
Council appointment of new members.
e
Within the next two-month period, the City
should establish interim review procedures and
evaluation criteria for use in reviewing
proposed projects in the Historic Preservation
District.
The City should investigate the possibility of
expanding the boundaries of the Historic
Preservation District.
0
The City should initirate the for~ation of
permanent design quidslines and special
/
/
/
/
/ x0.~ !)Xrec~ the cXt¥ Atto~ to prepare a Xea.e
ugr~ement for Old Town ~eneoula Foundation ~n Sam
Hicks
~lv ~, 1990
¸6.
The City ah~!d prepare & .c~mOrehen~ive, long-
:r '~ ,etrat~yy for the -l~uervation and
~ev~!opm~t o£ TJm Old Torn .area. addressinq
such: 'ff~e~..u land .~, o~roulation, parkinq,
?xalic tmorov~t~.wts, e~onc~tc development, and
7.1¸
&ppoint & chai~n for a Sister City Committee.
7,2 Invite interested individuals to participate on
this committee to explore the. po~eibility of'
afflliatinq vith Sister ¢iti~, International.
&uthorizs the ~yor to en~ into an agre~nt with
t!~ c-ounty of Riverside to provials G~ne~al S~rvices
as z~luired by '.tim City.
'9.:1.
&uthoriss the Nayor to ~nter into an agree~nt vith
the County of Rtvorsida to provide street
mintePanoa servioes in the City for one year.
Adopt a r~olution entitled:
4 W
MZNUTES OF &ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETZNG
OF THE TEMECULA CZTY COUNCZL
HELD JUNE ~9~ ~990
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order
at 7:05 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
ABSENT: i COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
Also present were City Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott
F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Doug Keup, Church of Christ.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember
Lindemans.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Parks declared June 23,
Shootout" Day in Temecula.
1990
as "Over the Hill Pigskin
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CZt~LENDAR
Councilmember Lindemans requested the removal of Items 2 and 3 from
the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Mufioz asked why Item No. 5 is on the agenda and
whether the standards could be modified at a later date.
City Manager Aleshire stated this item is on the agenda as
recommended by the City Engineer, Tim Serlett. The recommendation
is to adopt the uniform standards for plumbing. He stated these
standards can be modified by resolution at a later date.
#~nutes\6\19\90 - 1 - 06/25/90
City Council Minutes June 19. 1990
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
Moore to approve Consent Calendar Items 1, 4, 5 and 6 as follows:
1. Minutes
1.1 Approved minutes of June 5, 1990 as mailed.
4. P10t Plan No. 1133So Amended No. 2o Planning Correction No. I
4.1
Received and Filed Plot Plan No. 11338, Amended No. 2,
Planning Correction No. 1, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions of approval contained in the
County Staff Report.
e
Resolution AdoDtin~ the Standard Specifications for Public
Works Construction and Establishing Certain Requirements.
5.1 Adopted a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 90-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, WORK AREATRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
ESTABLISHING CERTAIN PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
6. &Dproval of City Manager's Contract
6.1
Authorized the Mayor to sign letter of agreement with
David F. Dixon to serve as City Manager of the City of
Temecula.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: i COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
2. Tentative Tract Map 23209, anendment No. 4
Councilmember Lindemans said he felt this issue would better
be handled by the Planning Commission. He stated his
opposition to destroying the hillside by moving 2 million
cubic feet of dirt, and questioned why a traffic impact study
had not been done.
Ninutes\6\19%90 -2- 06/25/90
City Council Minutes
June 19. 1990
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to refer Item No. 2 to the Planning Commission for
public hearings.
Councilmember Mufioz asked if the Council would have final
approval on this tract. Ross Geller, Planning Director,
stated the Final Map will come back before the City Council.
Mayor Parks said this item has gone through the County
Planning Staff, and asked if it can be expedited. Mr. Geller
said it will be placed on the next Planning Commission Agenda.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNC I LMEMB ERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Muhoz,
Parks
NOES: i COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
3. Final Tract HaD No. 24169
Councilmember Lindemans stated he did not have a problem
regarding the splitting of two parcels but asked if anyone was
addressing the road requirements for this project.
Tim Serlett, City Engineer, stated the developer is meeting
the conditions for approval. He said the developer is paving
the intersection of Moraga, and widening Rancho California
Road at Lindy Way.
Mayor Parks asked if the developer is creating a left-turn
pocket at Lindy Way? City Engineer Setleft said this project
was originally conditioned to stripe a left turn pocket for
Lindy Way. However, in dealing with the County Road
Department, they agreed to have the developer pay a fee, and
have the County do the striping plan and install the left turn
pocket. Mr. Serlett stated the developer has also agreed to
install the median.
Councilmember Lindemans suggesting taking this item off
calendar until the road conditions are met.
Tim Serlett, responding to Councilmember Mu~oz, said the left
turn pocket into Moraga Plaza and the median islands, are
under the direct control of the developer who is constructing
these improvements. He said the left turn on Lindy Lane would
be constructed by the County Road Department having received
a fee from the developer. The timing on when the County will
make these improvements is not known.
N ~ nutes\6\19%90 -3- 06/25/90
City Council Minutes June 19. 1990
Larry Markum, 41750 Winchester Road, representing the
developer stated the project has been delayed by the County
Traffic Section with regard to relocation of traffic signals
for six to eight months. He said the developer offered to
relocate the signal but the County declined. Mr. Markum said
the developer is ready to finish the improvements but has been
put on hold by the County. Mr. Markum further explained that
the median under construction by the developer would be a
raised median whereby a protected left turn could be made into
the plaza. He said the developer has complied with all
conditions of approval and would like to move forward.
Mayor Parks asked if delaying this map would have a negative
effect? Mr. Markum said that Kinder Kate is ready to close
escrow and needs this approval to do so. Mayor Parks
suggested not allowing occupancy until the road conditions are
met. Mr. Markumstated if the developer could have assurance
from the County Road Department that their portion of the work
would be completed, the developer would probably not have a
problem with some deferral of occupancy. He stressed,
however, the developer has no control over the County.
City Attorney Fields said in order to condition this final
map, a public hearing must be held. He said since this is a
final map, only issues concerning and health and safety may be
addressed.
Mayor Parks stated he felt this issue has been resolved, and
only the timing remains to be worked out. He suggested
continuing this for two weeks, to get the schedule for
completion of road improvements.
Mr. Markumasked the City to apply leverage with the County to
get a response. He stated the County has collected the
developer's money and needs to perform. He requested a one
week continuance.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by
Councilmember Moore to continue this matter for one week.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: i COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
#inures\6\19\90 .~,. 06125190
City Council M.~nutes
June 19. 1990
Councilmember Mufioz stated he felt the Council should
seriously consider reversing the decision of the County to
restripe and install left turn pocket, and return this
responsibility to developer. He stated he felt the
improvements would be made in a much more timely manner.
Mayor Parks said it is possible to install reflective tape on
a temporary basis to satisfy this road condition, as long as
it is safe. The County could later replace the tape and
permanently restripe the left turn pocket.
P~BLIC HEAI~ING8
7. Plot Pl&n No. 11234
City Manager Aleshire reported this is a request to build a
two story office building. Staff recommendation is to
continue this item off calendar to allow a traffic report and
other matters to be reviewed by staff. He said the developer
has agreed.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he felt the parking
requirements were not met, and suggested referring this item
to the Planning Commission.
Ross Geller, Planning Director, said he felt most of the
planning issues have been addressed, and recommended
continuing this item off calendar until the final matters are
resolved. He stated the applicant is agreeable to this.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:45 PM.
There being no public comment, the Mayor closed the public
hearing at 7:46 PM.
Councilmember Moore stated she had concerns regarding the on-
site traffic generated and asked if circulation will be looked
into. City Engineer Serlett answered this will be addressed.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to refer this item to the Planning Commission for
further discussion.
Councilmember Mufioz asked what the implications of referring
this to the Planning Commission would be.
Planning Director, Ross Geller, said this item has been
approved by the County, and this action would send this item
backward instead of moving forward.
#~ nutes\6\19\90 -5- 06/25/90
City Council Minutes June 19. 1990
City Manager Aleshire stated Willdan collects fees from
developers when doing planning studies that cover the cost of
these services. When a project comes from the County with a
recommendation of approval, all such fees have been collected.
If the City chooses to restudy an issue, funding must come
from the City budget. These costs have not been anticipated,
and the financial impact is significant.
Mayor Parks said the County has spent a lot of time reviewing
this plot plan. He said City staff has raised questions and
the Council is obligated to continue this item, yet needs to
move it along and not further delay the process by sending it
back before the Planning Commission. He stated there is no
reason why the City Council cannot address this issue.
Councilmember Muhoz asked if the City will receive additional
money from the developer. City Manager Aleshire stated the
fees were collected by the County. No further fees can be
collected from the developer. Mr. Aleshire stated this
applies to all projects referred by the County.
Councilmember Lindemans stated we will spend fees whether it
goes to the Planning Commission or to staff, and stressed this
is a very complicated project in which we need the expertise
of the Planning Condition.
Mayor Parks stated he felt he had a problem referring this
matter back to the Planning Commission. He said the Council
is very familiar with this project and it needs to be
addressed by the Council.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu5oz,
NOES: i COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: i COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
COUNCIL BUSINESS
8. Animal Control Services
City Manager Aleshire reported this is a proposal for the
County to continue to provide Animal Control Services to the
City of Temecula for Fiscal Year 1990-1991, in an amount not
to exceed $80,000. Mr. Aleshire said this contract could be
terminated any time in the future if desired.
H i nutes\6\ 19\90 * 6 - 06/25/90
City Council Minutes June 19. 1990
Councilmember Lindemarts questioned Section A-2
contract, stating it was open ended and asked
services could exceed $80,000.
in the
if these
City Manager Aleshire explained that the contract represents
an estimated cost for a truck operating eight hours a day for
one year. The contract enables the City to receive additional
service if needed, but the City would have control.
Councilmember Moore stated that in Section 2, Item C, the
contract states a copy of the agreement between the County and
the Lake ElsinoreAnimals Friends will be provided to the City
of Temecula upon request. She asked that this be requested.
Councilmember Moore asked under Item 3 (B) if the County will
inspect private kennels and catteries. City Manager Aleshire
said he did not have an answer to this question.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if it would be possible to sell
animal licenses at pet stores.
City Manager Aleshire said this is a good suggestion. He said
many cities issue license at City Hall, Fire Stations, etc.
and this would be looked into.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember
Mu5oz to approve a proposal with the County of Riverside to
provide Animal Control Services to the City of Temecula for
Fiscal Year 1990-1991.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu5oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
Councilmember Mu~oz moved,
motion to reconsider Agenda Item No. 7.
Councilmember Moore seconded a
The motion was carried by the following vote:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: i COUNCILMEMBERS:
H~t~\19\~ -7-
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu5oz,
Parks
None
Birdsall
06125190
City Council Minutes June 19. 1990
o
Plot Pl&n No. 11234
Councilmember Mufioz stated he was concerned with overloading
the Planning Commission. He said that additional tasks would
likely be given to the Planning Commission which they would
handle from inception. The Council is more familiar with the
details of this particular item. He said he would like to
change his vote on this item and sparingly give additional
tasks to the Planning Commission.
Councilmember Moore said she agreed as long as the traffic
engineering studies are provided to the Council.
Councilmember Lindemans said if the Council felt the Planning
Commission is overloaded, he would yield.
It was moved byCouncilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember
Lindemans to continue this item off calendar.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Muhoz,
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
CITY MAN~ER REPORTS
City Manager Aleshire requested that Council identify any known
traffic "hotspots" and be prepared to address the matter of
possible allocation of funding for the purpose of short-term
remedies.
He stated there is a need in the community to give some fast-track
attention to short-term traffic solutions.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Attorney Fields requested that Council adjourn to 6:30 on June
27, 1990 for the purpose of conducting an executive session on the
terms for the City Hall acquisition.
CITY COUNCI?. REPORTS
Councilmember Moore requested that staff investigate the matter of
the County holding four traffic signals which have been designated
to be installed in Temecula.
H ~ ~t es\6\19\90 - 8- 06/25/90
City Council Minutes
June 19. 1990
Councilmember Mu~oz requested that staff contact the County and
urge the completion of restriping, road repairs and providing at
least one decent street sweeping prior to termination of County
services on July 1, 1990.
Councilmember Lindemarts requested a report on the status of the
Stepben's Kangaroo Rat study.
Mayor Parks requested that
interviews for both Public
Commissioners.
staff coordinate rescheduling the
Safety and Parks and Recreation
He requested a status update on the City's taking over the Mello-
Roos District administration.
He also asked staff to look at incorporating plans for the Foothill
Corridor and for a by-pass road to be installed West of Old Town
into a City Circulation element.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Mu~oz seconded a motion to
adjourn at 8:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
#Jnute~\6\19\90 -9- 06/~5/90
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
ABe:
MTG:
DEPT
TITLE:
DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALONG YNEZ ROAD. NORTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
CITY ATTY
C[TYHGR ~
Recr~...t:ndstion
ADOPT attached Resolution 90- approving the dedication of two (2) easements
for public road and drainage purposes, including public utility and public
services purposes along the west side of Ynez Road, northerly of Rancho
California Road, and accepting the easements as part of the maintained-road
system, subject to satisfactory construction of required street improvements.
Discussion
On October 16, 1989, the County of Riverside approved Plot Plan 11220, located
on the west side of Ynez Road, northerly of Rancho California Road.
Conditions of approval required that the developer provide additional dedication
of right-of-way to meet the fifty (50) feet wide half-street standard in effect at
the time of conditioning this development.
The subject offers of dedication are six (6) feet in width, resulting in the
required fifty ~50) feet of right-of-way required.
Staff Concerns
The acceptance of the easements offered for road and drainage purposes into the
maintained-road system should be conditioned upon satisfactory completion of the
required roadway improvements.
Fiscal Impact
No immediate costs to be public are anticipated. Satisfactory construction of the
roadway improvement will minimize short term City maintenance efforts. Future
maintenance costs will be a part of the overall City Pavement Sealing and Overlay
Programs.
The dedications MEET the conditions of approval for Plot Plan 11220, and subject
to satisfactory completion of the required roadway improvements, will enhance the
roadway on a critical part of the City street system.
RESOLUTION NO. 90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC ROAD
AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES, INCLUDING PUBLIC
UTILITY AND PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES,
ALONG PORTIONS OF YNEZ ROAD
WHEREAS, The developer of Plot Plan No. 11220 has presented for approval
of the City Council of the City of Temecula, a dedication of EASEMENTS across
portions of Parcel 11, in Parcel Map 17q7tt, being along the west side of Ynez Road
north of Rancho California Road.
WHEREAS, Developer desires the City Council to approve said easements.
Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve
as follows:
SECTION 1.
That the easements as submitted by the developer, are
hereby approved by said city.
SECTION 2.
That the easements are accepted into the maintained-
road system by the City of Temecula, subject to
satisfactory completion of public improvement.
SECTION 3.
The Mayor shall sign this resolution and the City Clerk
shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption
thereof.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks,
Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
LeRoy D. Smoot
ROAD (X)MMISSIONER & COLINlY SURVEYOR
· ,.. ~ .... l!tt'~kINTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
P.O. BOX 1090
........................ ,-.""~'VEI~IDE, CAUFOP. N1A 92502
(7! 4.) 78
June 19, 1990
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
PO BOX 3000
43172 BUSINESS PARK DR.
TEMECULA, CA. 92390
Attention: Robert Righetti
RE: Plot Plan 11220
Sir,
Enclosed, per your request, please find a copy of the original
signed easement forms for the above referenced case. The legal
and plat have been corrected as per your instructions.
As soon as possible please have these forms approved by the City
Counsel and notify this office so we may sign and record these
documents.
William G. Stephenson
Senior Land Surveyor
WGS:tmg
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER ,, 4080 LEMON STREET * RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
OF- l~l~Y~ L~E~iC,~TIOIV
PCI.. A
CUI~VE
0 A /e Z.
12' 12'Q7u 2'~d. 00'
tI° 07/ 04 o ~052.00'
\/
A
M/CHAE/. ~. $~ ,~lV~
R.C.E 2'~l~
EX,~. ~- ~1- ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB//: "~ TITLE:
t4TG: 7/3/90 Purchase of City Manager's Vehicle DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
DEPT: C.M. CITY NGR
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the low bid as recommended by the City
Manager and authorize the purchase of said vehicle.
BACKGROUND:
On June 28, 1990, the City received five (5) bids for the City Manager's vehicle. After
reviewing the bids, the best low bid was received from DeAnza Chevrolet. The price of the
vehicle, including tax and license is $20,485.63.
DD:jsg
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: *'f TITLE: OEPT HD ~
HTG: ?/3/'~o FINAL TRACT MAPS 21675 AND 21675-6 CITY ATTY
DEPT: ~..~,,,,.~ CITY HGR ~
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council APPROVE Final Tract Maps 21675 and 21675-6, subject to
the conditions of approval.
DISCUSSION
Tentative Tract 21675 was submitted to the Riverside County Planning
Department in July, 1986, and was approved by the Board of Supervisors on
March 31, 1987. The second extension of time for the map expires on March 31,
1991. Tract 21675 is part of Specific Plan No. 199, adopted by the Board of
Supervisor's on October 6, 1988, and is covered under Development Agreement
No. 5.
Tract 21675 consists of seven phases, five of which have already recorded. Tract
21675 comprises 53 lots on 19.23 acres. Tract 21675-6 comprises 45 lots on 11.29
acres. A minimum lot size of 7200 square feet is created with these maps.
Tract 21675 is one of several tracts comprising the Executive Series Residential
Community within the Margarita Village Specific Plan. The developer for these
tracts is Mesa Homes. The tracts are located south of Rancho California Road and
east of Margarita Road. The following fees are required for the development of
Tract 21675-6 and 21675:
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Drainage
Fire
Inspection
Public Facilities
14,700.00
60,124.40
39,200.00
~4,075.00
419,146.00
The following bonds and agreements have been posted for the project:
Tract21675
Faithful Performance Material $ Labor
Streets
Water
Sewer
Monuments
Taxes
Fire
511,500.00 255,750.00
77,500.00 38,750.00
56,500.00 28,250.00
15,000.00
22,800.00
20,400.00
Tract 21675-6
Faithful Perromance Material $ labor
Streets 2~1,000.00
Water 38,000.00
Sewer ~6,000.00
Monuments 12,000.00
Taxes 22,800.00
120,500.00
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Final Tracts 21765 and 21765-6,
subject to the conditions of approval.
OFFICE OF THE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Ivan F. Tennant Acting
Road Comissioner
County Administrative Center
Mailing Address: PO Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
Telephone (714) 787-6554
June 15, 1990
SUBMITTAL TO FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF TENECULA
FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula
SUBJECT: Tract Map 21675
in the First Supervisorial District
SPECIFIC REQUEST:
Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it
is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map.
All required certificates and documents have been filed and
the map is ready for recordation.
Acting City Engineer
IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb
City of Temecula
Re: Tract 21675
The developer wishes to enter the following agreements to cover the
improvements within this subdivision for:
IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS (Bond No. 3S 740 912 00)
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (Water to be supplied by Rancho
California Water District)
(Bond No. 3SE 740 913 O0
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (Service to be provided by Eastern Municipal
Water District)
(Bond No. 3S 740 911 00)
SETTING OF LOT MONUMENTS (Bond No. 3S 740 910 00)
SECURING TAXES (Bond No. 3S 741 799 00)
MATERIALS AND LABOR Bond Nos. 3S 740 911 00, 3S 740 912 O0 and
3SE 740 913 O0 in the amounts of $28,250, $255,750, and $38,750 are
also attached.
FIRE AGREEMENT in the amount of $20,400.
The above referenced bonds are issued by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty.
This map complies in all respects with the provisions of Division 2 of
Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local ordinances.
The dedications made on the above map are for:
Lots "A" through "D", inclusive, and the abutters rights of
access along Rancho Vista Road and Meadows Parkway are
dedicated to public use for street and public utility pur-
poses, and as part of the city maintained road system.
2. Drainage easements are dedicated to public use.
OFFICE OF THE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Ivan F. Tennant Acting
Road Co--.issioner
County Administrative Center
Mailing Address: PO Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
Telephone (714) 787-6554
June 15, 1990
S[]B~ITTAL TO FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula
SUBJECT: Tract Map 21675-6
in the First Supervisorial District
SPECIFIC REQUEST:
Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it
is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map.
All required certificates and documents have been filed and
the map is ready for recordation.
Acting City Engineer
IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb
City of Temecula
Re: Tract 21675-6
The developer wishes to enter the following agreements to cover the
improvements within this subdivision for:
IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS (Bond No. 3S 687 505 00)
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM {Water to be supplied by Rancho
California Water District)
{Bond No. 3S 687 506 00)
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (Service to be provided by Eastern
Municipal Water District)
{Bond No. 3S 687 507 00}
SETTING OF LOT MONUMENTS (Bond No. 3S 687 508 00)
SECURING TAXES (Bond No. 3S 741 799 00)
MATERIALS AND LABOR (Bond Nos. 3S 687 505 00, 3S 687 506 O0 and
3S 687 507 O0 in the amounts of $120,500, $19,000 and $46,000 are
also attached.
The above referneced bonds are issued by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty.
This map complies in all respects with the provisions of Division 2 of
Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local ordinances.
The dedication made on the above map is for:
Lots "A" and "B", and the abutters rights of access along
Rancho Vista Road, are dedicated to public use for street
and public utility purposes, and as part of the city main-
tained road system.
:IiVE:I)iDE Cc)urI ¥
'PLA, IlI'IifK DEPAR ErI
DATE: June 11, 1987
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT HAP NO. 21675
E. A. NLKSER: 30956
REGIONAL TEAI~ NO. I
Dear Applicant:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors has taken the following action ~ the above
referenced tentative tract map at its regular meeting of March 31, 1987 ·
X APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions.
DENIED tentative map based on attached findings.
APPROVED withdrawal of tentative map.
The tract map has been found to be consistent with all pertinent elements of the
Riverside County General Plan and is in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970. %he pruj~j:t will not have a significant effect on 'the environment
and a Negative DeclaraUion' has bee~l~dopted.
A conditionally approvied tentat[~-~ract map shall expire _~?~onths a':ter the approval at
..... the Board of Supervisor% Hear-i~u~..ihe-dete of ~vhicl~-i~~'~ab~, unless within that
period of time a fin~)..4r~p~sh~ll ~(a.~. been approved and ,f,~e~wi'th ~he County Recorder.
Prior to the expiration d~te,C):J~e'~l~!-Ri. jv(~r/~ll~Y/'a)l~Pl~y .(.~i_~.!~_.ing .for. an extension of
time. Application shall';- ' .-~he Planning .Oi!~..~'t.~r..'~j~liiYty~(30) days prior to the
ten t~t_~_' ~ ~a~ ;.
expiration.date of the ' ))(IB~U~,~)~f,~:ts'~it~im~ay extend the period for
one y~ar and upon further ap~en a second and a third }tar.
'\
-~ Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director
JCB:ms
FILE- WHITE
~ohn C. Bischoff,/~ervising Planner
APPLICANT - CANARY ENGINEER - PINK
295-39 (~tv. 10/83)
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787'6181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM: Plannln$ DeparCB~nt SUBMITTAL DATE: FebFusty 25, 1987
SUBJECT: C~g;GE 0¥ ZONE &742, I~;L~IVE TltACr NOS. 21672 &mi. NO.
21673 &red. No. 1, 21674 &red. No. I and 21675 &mi. He. 1. r-toer Development,
First Supe~-~tsortal District, Rancho Ca/tfornla Areas 283 Tots/ Acres, 800
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Tota~ Lots, Schedu~ "A", RF. qUEST: £zou R-P, to It-l, It-2,
and R-5.
The Planning Connt~ston and graff gecomud:
ADOlfION of the Hesstire Declaration for Ravtronmental Assesanent
No. 30956 bas~l on the findinss ~ncozporated ~n the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed pzo~Ject vi~L~ not
have a significant effect on the anvtronment; and,
DENIAL of Change of Zone NO. 4742 fzou R-It to R-I and R-2; and,
APfitOVAL of Change of Zone Ho. &742 fzon R-It to R-l, I~-2, and !~-$
in accordance vtth Exhibit 4 sub~Ject to the attached conditions,
based on the findings and conclusions ~nco~porated tn the Plan~Lng
ComncLssion ncLuutas dated January 7, 1987; and,
APPROVAL of TENTATIVE TRACT HO. 21672, Amd. 'No. I sub:Ject to the !
attached conditions, based on the findtrip and conclusions Incor-
porated in the Planntn$ Comnlaston mlnutes dated January 7, 1987;
APPROVAL of 'rEKTATIVE TRACT NO. 21673, And. No. I eubJect to the
attached conditions, based on the findtnp and conclusions incor-
porated in the Plannin$ Commission uctnutes dated January 7, 1987;
and,
APPI~OVAL of TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21674, And. No. 1 sub:Ject to the
attached conditimm, based on the findings and conclusions incor-
porated in .the Plo~g Comn~sion n:Lnutes dated January 7, 1987;
APPltOVAL of TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21675, And. No. I sub:Ject to the
attached conditions, based on the fiudtnp and conclusions incor-
porated in the Planntu$ Commission minutes dated January 7, 1987.
ltoxe~' S.I Streeter, Planning Dlrector
POeM l~A (1~,J~2)
Prey. Agn. ref.
Depu. Comments Dist.
AGENDA N
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING coIqlqlSSlON gINLITES
JANUARY 7, 1987
(ASENDA ZTEIqS 24, 24a, 24b, 24c, 24d - REEL 926 - SIDE I - Z121-2422)
CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 4742 - EA 30956 -Katser Development - Rlncho California
Area -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrtct- 283.1t acres, south of Rancho california
Rd, west of Butterfield Stage Rd - R-R to R-1 and R-2, etc.
TRACT 21672 AMENDED NO. 1 - EA 30956 -Katser Development - Rancho California
Area -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrtct- south of Rancho california Rd, west of
Butterfield Stage Rd - 177 lots - 75t acres - R-R Zone. Schedule A
Subdivision
TRACT 21673 AMENDED NO. I - EA 30956 -Katser Development - Rancho california
Area -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrtct- south of'Rancho California Rd, west of
Butterfield Stage Rd - 140 lots - 57.8t acres - R-R Zone. Schedule A
Subdivision
TRACT 21674 AMENDED NO. 1 - EA 30956 - Kaiser Development - Rancho california
Area -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrtct- south of Rancho Clllfornta Rd, west of
Butterfield Stage Rd - 155 lots - 44~ acres - R-R Zone. Schedule A
Subdivision ~
TRACT 21675 AMENDED NO. 1 - EA 30956 -Katser Development - Rancho california
Area -Ftrst Supervisortat Dtstrtct- south of Rancho California Rd, west of
Butterfield Stage Rd - 325 tots - 106.3~ acres - R-R Zone. Schedule A
Subdivision
The heartngs were opened at 2:34 p.m. and closed at 2:52 p.m.
STAFF RECOI~[NDATION: Adoptton of the negattve declaration for EA 30956,
dental of Change of Zone case.4742 from R-R to R-1 and R-2, and approve] of
Change of Zone Case 4742 from R-R to R-l, R-2 and R-S in accordance wtt~
Exhtbtt 4. The subject applications proposed to change the zone from R R to
R-1 and R-2 and to subdivide 283 acres tnto 800 lots on properties wtthtn
Spectftc Plan 199, ~htch had been adopted by the Board of Supervisors on
August 26, 1986. The specJftc plan focussed on the destgn of the houstng and
the utilization of the extsttng topography, coupled wtth creattve terrac-
Ing gradtag to produce the effect of natural berrters between separate
'enclave' neighborhoods. Staff felt the applicant had attempted to meet thts
goal through the destgns of the subject tract maps, and that the proposed
zontng and tract maps were consistent wlth the approved spectftc plan and the
Comprehensive General Plan. Staff was recm~endtng an R-5 zone for the open
space lots, They had originally reco~l~ended an R-2-5000 zone for a portton of
the area requested for R-2 zontng, but after discussions vrlth the applicant
felt the density'could be adequately controlled wttha stretght R-2 zone and
had therefore amended thetr recommendation.
Two of the tract maps (No. 2~673 and No. 21675 ) proposed stngle famtly
residential lots under the R 1 zontng standards, and t~o of the tract maps
(No. 21672 and No. 21674) proposed slngte famtly residential lots under the
R-2 zontng standards. Hs. Crottnger revtewed an exhtbtt showtag the circula-
tion pattern for at1 four maps, advtstng the applicant had provtded for
north-south thoroughfares (between Tracts 21672 and 21673, and between Tracts
29
RTVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG COPIqXSSZON MZNUTES
JANUARY 7, 1987
21674 and 21675); there v~s no east-west circulation between the four tracts.
kxky circulation wou!d take place along the major roads (either Rancho Vista or
Rancho California Road). The proposed density for the four tract maps Nas
within the low to mid range densities allowed by the specific plano
Ns. Crottnger racomhanded amendments to Conditions 6, 17(d), 17(9)(1),
17(9)(3) and 19(c) for all four tract maps.
Csaba Ko. representing the applicant. agreed to the conditions as amended.
There ~as no further testtmny. and the heartng was closed at 2:52 p.m.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant has submitted requests to subdivide
283 acres into 800 lots within Spectftc Plan 199, Iqargartte Villages; Specific
Plan 199 identifies the density for the subject area to be 3 to 8 dwelltng
units per &cre; the applicant's combined proposals average 3.2 d~elltng units
per acre and range from 2.9 to 3.47 dwelling units per acre; the applicant's
proposals p~ovtde for "tot" lots, open space, and equestrian tretls as
outlined in the specific plan; the applicant has requested a change of zone
from R-R to R-1 and R-2; and the proposed zoning meets the intent of the
specific plan. The requested zontng (R-1 and R-2) ts inconsistent with ~
specific plan standards. The recommended zoning (R-l, R-2 and R-5) is
consistent wtth the spectftc plan and the applicant's request; the tentative
tract maps are designed in conformrice with the specific plan and Ordinances
348 and 460 standards; and the conditions of &pproval mitigate any environ-
mental concerns. The proposed projects wtll not have a significant effect on
the environment.
~TZON: Upon mtton by Countsstoner Bresson. seconded by Co,,,1ssloner
Purvtance and unantmusly cartted. the Commission recommended to the Board of
Supervisors denial of Change of Zone Case 4742 from R-R to R-1 and R-2 but
approval of Change of Zone Case 4742 from R-R to R-l, R-2 and R-5 tn
accordance ~tth Exhtbtt 4, and &pproval of Tract No. 21672 Amended No. 1,
21673 Amended No. 1, 21674 Amended No. I and 21675 Amended No. 1 subject to
the proposed conditions, amended as follows, based on the &hove flndtngs and
conclusions and the recontnendattons of staff.
6 - Delete the second sentence (Zf gradtng ts proposed on slopes of 10
percent or greater, an environmental assessment approval Wtll be requtred
from the Planntng Department prtor to an acceptance of the plans by the
Butldtng Department).
17(d) - Zf the open space lots and easements are to be mtntatned by a
homeowners association, then a property owner's association with the
unqualified rtghts. . . (balance of condition to be as shovm)
17(g)(1) -Prtor to the recordation of the ftnal map, the developer shall
ftle an application wtth the County for the formation of or
annexation to CSA 143, or burden the homeowners association, for
maintenance of coneon open space and parkNays.
30
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COHH:ZSSION M:ZNUTES
JANUARY 7. 1987
17(g)(3) ' Add to the end (after the ~ord 'district'): or homeotmers
association.
19(c) - Amend to requtre the acoustical study prtor to the tssuance of
but]dtng pe~mtts (not prlor to the submittal of but]dtng plans).
ROLL CALL VOTE RESULTED AS FOLLOI~S:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Coaetsstoners Beadling, Smtth, Oonahoe, Purvtance and Bresson
None
None
31
Zontng Area: Rancho California
Supervtsortal District: Ftrst
E.A. Number: 30956
Regtonal Team No. 1
Quur~E OF ZONE NO. 4742
TEIITMIVE TRACT 21672 Amd. #1
TENTATIVE TRACT 21673 .Amd. #1
TENTATIVE TRACT 21674 Jmd. tl
TEgTAT]VE TRACT 21675 Amd. #1
Planntng Commission: 1-7-87
Agenda Item No. 24 a, b, c, d
RZVERSZDE COURTY PLANNI~ DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
i !i Applicant: Katser Development Company
Engineer: R.B.F.
Type of Request: Change of zone from R-R to R-1 and R-2, two
R-2 subdivisions and two R-1 subdivisions
~. 4. Location: Southerly of Rancho California Road, easterly
c~~ ~ Extsttng Zontng: R.~f MergerIra
: Surrounding Zontng: R-R, R-2, R-l, C-1/C-P and Spectftc Plan 199
7. Stte Characteristics: Low ro111ng htlls
~-2". 8. Area Characteristics: Developed stngle femtly homes to the west,
9. Comprehensive General Plan
Elements:
10. Land Dtvtston Data:
11.
School District
a. Impacted?
b. School agreement
received?
12.a Agency Recommendations
and Tract Data:
Tract 21672 Amd. ~1
(R-2 Tract)
75 acres gross
179 Lots Total
174 Residenttel Lots
3.45 du/gross acre
4500± sq. ft. min. lot size
high school to the south
LAND USE: Specific Plan 199 Margarita
Village
DENSITY: Medium Low 3 to 8 du/acre
OPEN SPACE/CONS: Specific Plan 199
TOTAL ACREAGE: 283
TOTAL LOTS: 786 Residential Lots
800 Lots Total
DU PER ACRE: 3.2 du/gross acreage
PROPOSED MIN. LOT SIZE: R-1 Tracts - 7200
sq. ft.
R-2 Tracts - 4500
sq. ft.
Yes
Yes, Temecula Union and Elsinore Union High
School
See letters dated:
ROAD:
HEALTH:
FLOOD:
FIRE:
WATER:
LAND USE:
3-31-87
10-17-86 and g-5-86
10-17-86 and g-23-86
11-12-B6
9-03-86
10-23-B6
gRM~E OF ZONE RO. 4742
TENTATIYE TRACT NOS. 2167:~ /bad. #1
thru 21675 Aad. #1
Page 2
12.b Agency Recomendattons
and Tract Data:
Tract 21673 Amd. #1
(R-1 Tract)
57.8 acres gross
141 Lots Total
138 Residential Lots
2.9 du/acre
7200 sq. ft. min. lot stze
12.c Agency Recommendations
and Tract Data:
Tract 21674 Amd. #1
(R-2 Tract)
44 acres gross
155 Lots Total
153 Residential Lots
3.47 du/acre
4500± sq. ft. min. lots size
12.d Agency Recomnendattons
and Tract Data:
Tract 21675 Amd. ~1
(R-1 Tract)
106.3 gross acres
325 Lots Total
321 Residential Lots
3 du/acre
7200 sq. ft. min. lot size
13. Letters:
14. Sphere of Influence:
See letters dated:
ROAD:
HEALTH:
FLOOD:
F1 RE:
WATER:
LAND USE:
10-21-86
1-29-87
10-17-86 and 9-24-86
12-11-86 and 9-9-86
9-03-86
10-23-86
See letters dated:
ROAD: 10-21-86
HEALTH: 1-28-87
FLOOD: 3-23-87
F! RE: 9-09-86
WATER: 9-03-86
LAND USE: 10-23-86
See letters dated:
ROAD: 3-31-87
HEALTH: 1-28-87
FLOOD: 10-17-86 and 9-23-86
FIRE: 9-11-86 and 11-12-86
WATER: 0-03-86
LAND USE: 10-23-86
Opposing/Supporting: None as of this
None
ANALYSIS:
The applicant ts proposing a change of zone from R-R ~o R-1 and R-2 and to
subdivide 283 acres into 800 lots wtthtn Specific Plan 199, ~rgartta Village.
Specific Plan 199 yes adopted by the Board of Supervisors on August 26, 1986.
~rgartta Village ts a 1275.5 acre project proposing the establishment of 3650
residential dwelling units incorporating a variety of housing types wtth mixed
densities. The focus of the Spectftc Plan ~s the destgn of the housing
contained within and the utilization of the existing topography coupled with
creative terracing grading to produce the effect of natural barriers between
separate "enclave" neighborhoods. The applicant has strived to meet this focus
through the destgns of Tracts 21672, 21673, 21674, and 21675.
CHARGE OF ZORE NO. 4742
TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 21672 /~d. #1
thru 21675 ~nd. #1
Page 3
TENTATIVE TRACT 21672
Tentative Tract 21672 ts an R-2 proposal tn Planntng Areas 30 and 32 of the
Spectftc Plan. Planntng Area 30 ts 1denttried as haytrig 'family oftented
houstng' wtth 'medtum to low denstry' at a denstry range of 3 to 8 dwelling
untts per acre. Planntng Area 32 ts 1denttried as medtum famtly residential
wtth a denstry range of 8 to 14 dwelltng untts per acre. Planntng Area 32 ts
encompassed enttrely by Lot 179 of the tentative tract. Both Planntng Areas
a~e wtthtn Phase I of the Spectftc Plan.
Tract 21672 proposed 174 residential lots. Lots 33 and 97 are tot lots. Lots
177 and 178 are open space lots. Lot 178 also tncludes a 10 feet ~ide horse
trail as requtrecl under the Specific Plan. I~tvate common open space within
each planning area as per the Spectftc Plan text ts devoted to passtve open
space use. In the family oriented areas, this may tnclude facilities for
picnictrig, children's play areas, and small lot sports such as volleyball or
basketball. Exact destgn and layout of the open space facilities for Tract
21672 are requested as a part of the conditions of approval.
As Indicated tn ttem 12a on the cover page, Tract 21672 proposes a mfnlmum
residential lot stze of 4500t square feet and a dwelltng untt density of 3.45
untts per acre. The applicant ts proposing four d~fferent floor plans, with
each plan having 4 elevations. The smallest house proposes square feet;
and, the largest square feet. The project ts tn conformance with
Ordinance 348 as tt rela.tes to development standards for restricted single
famtly development tn the R 2 zone. The lots haytrig f~ontage on Rancho
California Road and Iqargartta Road are conditioned for an acoustical study
prtor to the tssuance of butldtng pe~mtts as per-condition number 10 of the
Spectftc Plan.
Staff reco~nends that Lots 33, 97, 177, and 178 be zoned R-$ to reflect their
intended use; that lot 179 be zone R-2 to reflect the 143 dwelling units
assigned to that planning area as per the Specific Plan; and, that the
remaining lots be zoned R-2 to accommodate the proposed tract.
TENTATIVE TRACT 21673
Tentative Tract 21673 ts an R-1 proposal covertng Planning Areas 28 of the
Spectftc Plan. Planning Area 28 encompasses the 11.6 acre school
administration center 1denttried as Lot 139 on the tentative tract. Planning
Area 28 ts 1denttried wtth the same denstry range of 3 to 8dwelling units per
acre as Planning Area 30; and tt ts also wtthtn Phase ! of the Specific Plan.
Tract 21673 proposes 138 residential lots wtth a mtntmum lot stze of 7200
square feet; and, t~o open space lots, Lots 140 and 141. Lots 140 ts for slope
maintenance along Rancho Vista Road; and Lot 141 covers the Municipal ~ter
Otstrtct easement and Incorporates the 10 feet wide horse tratl requtred under
C~ANGE OF Z~E RO. 474Z
TEllTAT:lYE TRACT IIOS. 21672
t~ru 21675 /mi. tl
Page 4
the Spectftc Plan. There are no parks or tot lots proposed for Tract 21673 but
the Spectftc Plan states that tt should be emphasized that I~rgartta Vtllage is
planned as a stngle tritegrated co,t~untty and that contnuntty wtde recreational
facilities (tf publlc) wtll be available to all residents of Hargartta Village
and the Rancho California Cornunity as a '~ole. "Therefore, future Individual
tract approvals must recetve credtt for the overall project-~tde open space and
recreation systems tn assessing open space and recreation factltty requirements
· for each future Individual tract."
Staff recon~nends that Lots 139, 140, and 141 be zoned R-5; and, the remainder
to be zoned R-1 as requested.
TENTATIVE TRACT 21674
Tentative Tract 21674 ts an R-2 proposal covertng Planntng Areas 21 and 24 of
the Spectftc Plan. Both of these Planntng Areas are 1denttried wtth the same
density range of 3 to 8 dwelltng untts per acre as Planntng Area 30; howdyer,
they are wtthtn Phase I! of the 5pectftc Plan. The Spectftc Plan states that
phases my overlap based on changtrig economtc and market trends. However,
major publlc factlity and 1nlrastructure construction wtll be completed for
each phase according to development requirements.
Tract 21674 proposes 153 residential lots. Lots 88 and 155 are open space
lots. Lot 88 is proposed for tot lot; and Lot 155 is an open space lot for
drainage purposes and the 10 feet wide horse tratl as required under the
Specific Plan. The horse trail requirement is also proposed to be met via
easements along the rear yards.of Lots 5 through 21 and the side yard of Lot 1.
Exact design and layout of the open space facilities are required as part of
the conditions of approval.
The project proposed a minimum lot size of 4500± square feet and a dwelling
unit density of 3.47 units per acre. There are 4 different floor plans, with
each plan having 3 elevations. The ~nallest house proposes 845 square feet;
and, the largest 1527 square feet. The project is in conformance with
Ordinance 348 as it relates to development in the R-2 zone. The lots having
frontage on Rancho California Road and the Kaiser Parkway are conditioned for
an acoustical study prior to the issuance of building permits as per condition
number 10 of the Specific Plan.
Staff recommends that lots 88 and 155 be zoned R-5 to reflect the intended open
space use; and, the reminder of the tract to be zoned R-2 as requested.
TENTATZVE TRACT 21675
Tract 21675 ts an R-1 proposal covertng Planntng Areas 20, 22, 23, and 25 in
Phase Z! of the Spectftc Plan; and, Planntng Areas 26 and 27 in Phase I. All
of the above Planntng Areas are 1dentilted wtth the same density range of 3 to
8 dwelltrig units per acre as Planning Area 30.
C~gI~E OF ZOgE #0.
TEgT~T~VE TRACT I~S. 2~672 ~d. #1
Pa9e $
The project proposes 32! residential lots wtth a mtntmum lot stze of 7200
square feet; t~o park lots, lot 57 and 211; and, t~o open space lots for slope
maintenance along Katser Parkvray and Street A, Lots 324 and 325. Exact design
and layout of the open space facilities are reclutred as part of the conditions
of approval. Residential lots adjacent to the Katser Parkay are conditioned
for an acoustical study prtor to the tssuance of a butldtng permit as per
condition number 10 of the Spectftc Plan.
Staff recommends that lots 57, 211, 324 and 325 be zoned R-5 to ~eflect their
intended use.
CONCLUSION:
There are 786 residential lots proposed by the four tracts. The Spectftc Plan
Planning Areas identify a d~elltng unit count of 763. The Specific Plan text
handles the difference through its statement that 'ftnal development densfries
shall be determined through the appropriate tract application, up to the
maximum density identified for the Planning Area in questton as sho~n on Table
I-2 based upon, but not 11mtted to the following: adequate availability of
services; adequate access and circulation; sensitivity to land forms;
innovation in housing types; adequate provision of recreational open space;
sensitivity to neighborhood design through appropriate lot and street layouts;
compatibility with surrounding off-site development, land uses and densities
etc.. The target dwelltrig unit count for the areas identified as Medium to low
density ts 102! homes. The total project count is consistent with that number.
ENVZRONMENTAL CONCERNS
All environmental concerns have been addressed thoroughly in the Environmental
Impact Reports for the Rancho Villages Policy Plan and Margarita Village as
well as in Environmental Assessment 30956 which is attached. All concerns are
mitigated through the conditions of approval.
FINDXNGS:
1. The applicant has submitted requests to subdivide 283 acres into 800 lots
within Specific Plan 199, Margarita Villages.
2. Specific Plan 199 identifies the density for the subject area to be 3 to 8
dwelling units per acre.
3. The applicants combined proposals average 3.2 dwelling units per acre and
range from 2.9 to 3.47 dwelling units per acre.
4. The applicant proposals provide for tot lots, open space and equestrian
trails as outlined in the Specific Plan.
CHANGE OF ZI)NE NO. 4742
TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 21672 Amd. #1
thru 21676 Amd. #1
Page 6
5. The applicant has requested a change of zone from R-R to R-1 and R-2.
6. The proposed zoning meet the intent of the Specific Plan.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The requested zontng is Inconsistent with Specific Plan standards.
2. The proposed zontng ts consistent wtth the Spectftc Plan and the applicants
request.
3. The tracts as designed are tn conformance wtth Specific Plan standards,
Ordinance 460, and Ordinance 348.
4. The conditions of approval mtttgate any environmental concerns.
RECOI~ENDATZONS:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment Number 30956
based upon the findings in the initial study and the conclusion that the
proposed projects will not have a significant effect on the environment~ and,
DENIAL of Change of Zone Case No. 4742 from R-R to R-1 and R-2; but,
APPROVAL of Change of Zone Case No. 4742 from R-R to R-l, R-2, R-2-5000, and
R-5 in accordance with Exhibit 45 and,
APPROVAL of Tentative Tracts 21672 Amd. #1, 21673 Amd. #1, 21674 Amd. #1, and
21675 Amd. ~1 subject to the attached conditions and based upon the findings
and conclusions in the staff report.
DA3:me 12-18-86
t~ ~CZ 4742
; VAC
t
V AC
KAISER DEVEL~ I~
C
V & C
mAP
i
CZ 4742
oo
C,Z 4742 / TR m*ra, ams, m'r4,ams
:R.R ·
~R-R
~,~::.:- KAISER D 'E~.LDI~Eh[T CCL
~:.~ ~' R-R TO .R-I,, R-~ & R-**S
[1','~[ :.. ~ GAbIF.
./'
R-R
~IMIMdJIffA
· \
RXVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITZONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21675 AMD. #1
OA~: P~.CH ~;3, ~7
NtENDED NO.
EXPTRES: PIARCH .~], .'1_0.~
STANDARD CONDITIONS
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A , unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Oeoartment of Building and
Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one Drtnt of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The
plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval.
e
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
SAfety orior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way.
One mylar copy of the approved grading plan shall be submitted to the
?epartmant of Butldtnq and Safety for transmittal to the Road Department.
~eleted at Planning ConTn~ssion 1-7-87).
Any delinquent property taxes shall be p~td Drtor to recordation of the
final map.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Oeoartment's letter dated
_~:~!-.,q7 a copy of which is attached.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21675 AMD. ~!
Conditions of Approval
Page -3-
17.
d. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the R-1 zone.
eo
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot
shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet,
exclusive of the utility easement.
fe
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to ~ECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met.
County Fire Department County Health Department
County Flood Control County Planning Department
Santa Ana Regional Water Qualtiy Control Board
Metropolitain Water District
Rancho California Water District
Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone No. 4742
shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective.
Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property.
The common open space area shall be shown as a numbered lot on the
final map and shall be managed by a master property owners association
or other appropriate authority as indent·fled in the specific plan.
de
If the open space lots and easements are to be maintained by a home
owner association then a property owner's association with the un-
qualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for
reasonable maintenance costs shall be established and continuously
maintained. The association shall have the right to lein the property
of the owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such
lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first
deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and
for value and is of record prior to the lien of the association.
{Amended per Planning Commission 1-7-87}.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21675 AMD. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page -7-
lg.
3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
4)
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 100 feet in horizontal length,
the horizontal-contours of the slope shall be curved in a
continuous, undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved
by the Director of Building and Safety.
ge
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist
shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the
proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to
significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist
and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When
necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the
authority to temporarily divert or redirect grading activity to allow
recovery of resouces.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
aJ
In accordance with the written request of the developer to the County
of Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the
agreement between the developer and the Elsinore Union High School
and Temecula Union School District, no building permits shall be issued
by the County of Riverside for any parcels within the subject tract
until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with the terms of said agreement for between
the developer and the School Districts.
In accordance with the written request of the developer to the County
of Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the
agreement between the developer and the County of Riverside, no
building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any
parcels within the subject tract until the developer, or the developer's
successors-in-interest provided evidence of compliance with the terms
of said agreement for the financing of public facilities. {library)
Prior to the issuance of building permits an acoustical study shall be
performed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation
measures that shall be applied to individual dwelling units within
the subdivision to reduce ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn
along Kaiser Parway. {Amended per Planning Commission 1-7-87).
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21675 AMD. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page -8-
Prior to the issuance of building permits; composite landscaping,.
recreational, and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects
the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be installed
including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope
planting, and individual front yard landscaping.
All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be
designed and constructed with fire retardent {Class A} roofs as
approved by the County Fire Marshal.
20. Prior to the ~ssuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
ae
Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and
Safety Department, a fencing plan along Rancho Vista road and Kaiser
Parkway shall be submitted for Planning Director approval.
All landscaping, irrigation and recreational facilities shall be
installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting,
interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as
approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and
Safety.
Not withstanding the preceding condition% wherever an acoustical
study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls s.hall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461.
e. Street trees shall be planted throuqhout the subdivision in accordance
with standards of Ordinance 460.
f. Street lights shall be installed within the subdivision.
CJC:bc
12/18/86
LeRoy D. Smoot
COMMISSJOd~tl & COUNTY SUliYtYOe
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
OFFICE OF ROAD COM4AIIS.SIONER (; COL'NTY SURVEYOR
March 31, 1987
Oet, ebeP-gJv-t986
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
Tract Map 21675 - Amend tl
Schedule A - Team 1
* Amended by Board March 31, 1987
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvements and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461).
It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows all existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their
omission may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These
Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement
occurring in ONE is as binding as through occurring in all. They are intended
to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the
improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall
be referred to the Road Ccmnissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate crainage facilities including enlarging
existing'facilities or oy securing a drainage easement or by
both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map
and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Depar~ent.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the
Road Commissioner per~its the use of streets for drainage
purposes. the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply. Should the ouantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited'for drainage
purposes, the sub, iv,der shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Tract ,l~ap 2)675 - Amend #1
Schedule A - Team !
tle~e~-~i~-~986 I~rch :31, 1987
Con'd i t t on s
,~ded by Board March 31, 1987
10.
11.
~jor drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the R~ad Department.
~aiser Parkway shall be improved within the dedicated right of way
in accordance with County Standard No. 101, (38'/50').
Rancho Vista Road shall be improved within the dedicated right of
way in accordance with County Standard No. 102, Section 32'/44').
Street 'A" shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (44'/66').
Streets "B", 'L" and "M" shall be improved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section
A. (40'/60').
Streets "C", "D", "F", "G", 'H', "I", 'J", "K", "N", "0" and
shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accorUance
with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (36'/60').
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the land
division in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 {curb
sidewalk}.
A primary and secondary access road to the nearest paved road
maintained by the County shall be constructed within the public
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section
B, (32'/60') at a grade and alignment as approved by the Road
Commissioner. This is necessary for circulation purposes.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall
deposit with the Riverside County Road Department a cash sum of
$150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should
the developer choose to defer the time of payment~ he may enter
into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment
to the time of issuance of a building permit. No traffic signal
mitigation will be required on open space lots 324 and 325.
Tract Map 21675 - Amend tl
Schedule A - Team 1
~ebe~.~l~--19e6 March 31, 1987
Condi t't ons
P'a~)e 3
Amended at Board I~rch 31, 1987
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
lg.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at
a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road
Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply
acceptance for maintenance by County.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog. seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard.
Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall be
constructed throughout the landdivision.
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Kaiser Parkway & Rancho Vista
Road and so noted on the final map...
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope
easements as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho Calif.
Water District prior to the recordation of the final map.
The minimum centerline rmdii shall be 300' or as approved by the
Road Department.
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall
be 35 feet.
Street trees shall be planted in conformance with the provisions
of Article 13a of Ordinance 460.53 and their location(s} shall be
shown on street improvement plans.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County
Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans..
,'fact Nap 21675 - Amend tl
~chedule, A - Team 1
)c~vbr~ -~1-#-1a~6 Narch 31, 1987
:on~tti ans*
~age 4
~nded by Board ~rch ~l, 1987
24.
25.
* 26.
27.
When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope,
& debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right
of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the
Road Commissioner.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the
face of curb.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90°
feet-o~-tan§en~-q~d-~t~e-~ew-~Me as approved by the Road
Commi ss ioner.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall
be coordinated with TR 21674 and TR 21673.
GH:lh
Very. truly yours,
Gus Hughes
Road Division Engineer
* 26. All centerline intersections shall be at gO° as approved
by the Road Con~nissioner.
*Amended at Board March 31, 1987
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ~ TITLE: DEPT HD ~
MTG: -~15tlo VACATION OF PORTION OF CITY ATTY
DEPT:~,,~,.,~.~,~ MERCEDES STREET CITY HGR ~
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council vacate a portion of Mercedes Street subject to reservation
of easements for public utility purposes, and further subject to obtaining an
access easement from the State of California over the easterly half of Mercedes
Street.
DISCUSSION
The intent to vacate the subject portion of Mercedes Street is to provide off street
parking for the Sam Hicks Monument Park. The vacation of the street results in
each half of the vacation street reverting to the respective frontage property
owner. Thus the westerly half reverts to the park site as deeded by the
Temecula Union School District, and the easterly half reverts to the state of
California which owns the joint fire department's site.
Fire department access is maintained with the street vacation but mutual ingress-
egress easements over the vacated portions of the street would enhance and
provide better vehicular and pedestrian movement in this mutual access and
parksite parking area.
STAFF CONCERNS
Granting of mutual access easements will require State of California approvals at
several levels and will not be accomplished shortly. We would therefore
recommend that this street vacation be conditional and subject to obtaining these
mutual access easements.
FISCAL IMPACT
The improvement costs for this parksite including the street improvements and
parking area are estimated to be $41,000 by the design consulting engineer. The
County is providing approximately $47.000 through CBDG funds.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
VACATION OF A PORTION OF MERCEDES THAT
PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 3,
PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAY
CODE.
WH~AS, it appearing to the satisfaction of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, California, that a resolution of intention to vacate the hereafter portion of Mercedes
Street was duly and regularly passed the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 14th day
of June, 1990, and that said resolution was posted in three (3) public places pursuant to said
Resolution No. 90-60, not more than fifteen (15) days from the date of passage or less than ten
(10) days before the time of the hearing on the said proposed vacation; and that a "Notice of
Public Hearing" was posted along the street to be considered for vacation in accordance with
Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 9 of the streets and highways code and that said hearing on the
proposed vacation having regularly come before the City Council for heating on the 3rd day of
July, 1990, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. on said day, the City Council having found from all the
evidence submitted that the hereinafter described portion of Mercedes Street is unnecessary for
present or prospective sheet purpose.
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that the portion of Mercedes sheet shown and
described on attachment "A" hereto is hereby vacated subject to condition:
That a mutual ingress and egress easement be negotiated, executed, and approved by the
City Council of the City of Temecula and the State of California over the portion of Mercedes
Street to be vacated prior to certification and recording of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Temecula does herewith reserve and
except from the vacation above referred to, a permanent public service easement over and upon
vacation of said portion of Mercedes Street to construct, place, operate, inspect, maintain,
repair, replace and remove such public utility underground and overhead facilities as may be
necessary upon over and across the said portion of Mercedes Street herein vacated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
resolution of vacation, attested by the City Clerk, to be recorded, when the condition herein set
forth has been satisfied, without acknowledgement, certificate of acknowledgement or further
proof in the office of the Recorder of the County of Riverside.
3/Res~78
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[ATTES~
3/Resos78
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250
Temecula, California 92390
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ABANDONMENT
MERCEDES STREET
June 4, 1990
JN 26087-M1
Page 1 of 1
That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of
Mercedes Street (60.00 feet wide) as shown on a map of the "Town
of Temecula" filed in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, lying
northerly of a line parallel and/or concentric with and 30.00 feet
northerly from the following described line:
BEGINNING at the centerline intersection of Moreno Road with
Mercedes Street as shown on a map filed in Book 61, Page 14 of
Records of Surveys in the Office of the County Recorder of said
Riverside County;
thence along said centerline of Mercedes Street
South 72°51'02" East 31.50 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve
in said centerline concave northerly and having a radius of 405.78
feet;
thence along said curve and centerline easterly 134.62 feet through
a central angle of 19°00'29";
thence tangent from said curve North 88°08'29" East 174.24 feet to
the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly and having
a radius .of 150.00 feet, the southeasterly terminus of said curve
being tangent to the centerline of said Mercedes Street (60.00 feet
wide);
thence along said curve southeasterly 121.30 feet through a central
angle of 46°19'54" to said tangent intersection;
thence tangent from said curve, along said centerline
South 45°31'37" East 117.86 feet to the centerline of 6th Street.
EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
L.S. 3527
EXP. 6-30-92
Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527
co.
R'. 800.0~'
L ~ ~4.$$'
EXHIBIT 'B' __ SKETCH
TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
,4~ANO~)iVMENT
MERCEDES STBEE T
OAIE I SCALE
SHEET I OF / ~HEET
~bert c'~ei~z, fiT~illiam ~FrOst ~ ~ssociates
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, P~NNERS & SURVEYORS
2~765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE * SUITE 2~ · R~C~ ~IF~NIA, ~ ~
(714) 676.~42 · FAX (714) 676-7240
FIELD BOOK ~ JOB NO
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: G TITLE: DEPT
MTG: 'W'~l,~o OLD TOWN HISTORIC REVIEW CITY ATTY
DEPT:q3k~, PROCEDURES AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY NGR
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council ADOPT the
recommendations as delineated in the text of this report.
BACKGROUND
At the request of the City Council, the Planning Staff has investigated the
procedures and evaluation criteria utilized by Riverside County in reviewing
development proposals in the Temecula Historical Preservation District (Old
Town). The results of our initial investigation were presented to the Planning
Commission at their meeting on June 18. A copy of the staff report presented to
the Planning Commission is attached for the Council~s review. Also attached is
a map of the historic district boundaries and a copy of County Ordinance No. 578,
which establishes historic district review procedures.
In brief, the County's historic district ordinance established a five-member, local
historic review board which makes recommendations to the Planning Director on
development proposals within the historic district. The original board members
were appointed by the Board of Supervisors in 1980. Due to resignations, only
two board members remain: Doc Cummings and Bob Morris.
The Planning Commission unanimously endorsed all of staff~s recommendations for
incorporating historical review procedures into the City's development review
process, with some added specificity. The Planning Commission's
recommendations to the City Council are as follows:
Review of development proposals and property alterations within the
Temecula Historic Preservation District for historic appropriateness should
be incorporated into the City's development review process as soon as
possible.
The City should re-establish full membership for the Temecula Historic
Review Board through Council appointment of new members.
Within the next two-month period, the City should establish interim review
procedures and evaluation criteria for use in reviewing proposed projects
in the Historic Preservation District.
The City should investigate the possibility of expanding the boundaries of
the Historic Preservation District.
The City should initiate the formulation of permanent design guidelines and
special development standards for the Historic Preservation District.
The City should prepare a comprehensive, long-range strategy for the
preservation and development of the Old Town area addressing such issues
as land use, circulation, parking, public improvements, economic
development, and urban design.
If the Council is in agreement, staff requests authorization to initiate
development of interim review procedures and evaluation criteria for the historic
district.
CITY OF TEHECUL~
PL~,h'NI N~ DE P~%RTI~ENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
June 14, 1990
City of Temecula Planning Commission
Ross Geller, Planning Director
OLD TOWN HISTORICAL DISTRICT
At the Commission's request, Staff has investigated the
procedures and criteria which have been utilized by the County
to review and evaluate development proposals in Temecula's Old
Town District. In addition, recommendations have been
formulated for incorporating similar procedures into the City's
Development Review Process.
In the late 1970's, members of the Temecula Historical Society
and other local citizens urged County officials to establish
some development controls which would help ensure the historic
character of the Old Town area. In response, the County
initiated a study of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance for
the purpose of establishing a historic preservation program for
Temecula. The County's first action was the adoption of a
Historic Preservation Element for the General Plan in early
1979. The Historic Preservation Element established a detailed
policy framework for subsequent actions aimed at preserving
historical resources throughout the County. In late 1979, the
Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 578 which provided
for the establishment of historic preservation districts and set
up a process for local review of development proposals in such
districts.
The Temecula Historic District was established by the County in
1980. The historic district encompasses a 15-block area in
downtown bounded by 6th Street to the north, River Street to the
west, 2nd Street to the south, and Interstate 15 to the east.
Originally, a much larger area was proposed to be included in
the historic district, however, local opposition prevented this.
Ordinance No. 578 states that if property owners of more than
one-half of the total assessed valuation within the proposed
district are opposed to the district, then the district may not
be established. In order to overcome opposition from property
owners outside the downtown core, the area of the historic
preservation district was reduced.
Ordinance No. 578 provided for the establishment of a local
review board to oversee preservation activities and review
development proposals in the historic preservation district.
Page Two
June 14, 1990
The local review is intended to be composed of five (5) members
appointed by the Board of Supervisors.
The board members are to serve staggered two-year terms without
pay. One member is required to be knowledgeable in
architectural and construction techniques. The board is
required to hold regular meetings and is responsible for
establishing its own rules and procedures. Specifically,
Ordinance No. 578 provides the local review board with the
following duties:
Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals
interested in constructing or altering property within the
district.
Recommend implementation guidelines and standards to be
used in the review of the applications.
Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of
significant historic resources within the district.
Serve as an advisory resource to County agencies in matters
pertaining to the district.
®
Render advice and guidance, upon request, to property
owners and occupants within the district.
Encourage public understanding and appreciation of the
unique heritage of the community.
The local review board does not have the authority to approve or
deny proposed development projects or other property
alterations. Instead, they serve in an advisory capacity to the
planning director, who has the responsibility for issuing
Certificates of Historic Appropriateness. Without such a
Certificate, projects may not move forward. Applicants pay a
fee to have their projects reviewed for historic appropriateness
by the planning director. The planning director seeks advice
from the local review board and other agencies or departments,
who have 30 days to respond in writing. The planning director's
decision may be appealed to the area planning council.
Temecula's local review board refers to itself as the Historical
Review Board. The original membership of the board has never
been changed, although resignations, including two very
recently, have left the Board with only two acting members,
which is not enough for a quorum. In its ten-year history, the
Board has reviewed an average of only one or two cases per year
(according to one of its members), the most recent being earlier
this year. It appears that neither the Board nor the County
ever adopted any detailed design guidelines or evaluation
Page Three
June 14, 1990
criteria to guide its decisions on development proposals,
although this is still being researched. The Board has worked
to make projects conform to an 1890s theme of southwest
architecture. The Board has worked to make projects conform to
an 1890s them of southwest architecture. The Board has kept its
procedures and meetings fairly informal. It appears that pre-
application conferences with applicants, as described in
Ordinance No. 578, rarely occurred.
With the incorporation of the City of Temecula, the Temecula
Historic Preservation District remains intact and Ordinance No.
578 is still technically in effect. The County's zoning and
development standards are also still in effect. The County's
development standards have always presented some difficulties in
Old Town because they have not been customized to address the
unique situations in this area and have not been designed to
promote the historic preservation objectives of the district.
In conclusion, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
make the following recommendations to the City Council.
Review of development proposals and property alterations
within the Temecula Historic Preservation District for
historic appropriateness should be incorporated into the
City's development review process as soon as possible.
The City should immediately establish its own historical
review board for the Temecula Historic Preservation
District. The Planning Commission may choose to take on
these responsibilities itself or recommend the appointment
of a separate board or committee advisory to the Commission
and Council.
The City should establish interim review procedures
evaluation criteria for use in reviewing proposed projects
in the Historic Preservation District.
The possibility of expanding the boundaries of the Historic
Preservation District should be investigated.
The City should initiate the formulation of
guidelines and special development standards
Historic Preservation District.
design
for the
The City should prepare a comprehensive, long-range
strategy for the preservation and development of the Old
Town area addressing such issues as land use, circulation,
parking, public improvements, economic development and
urban design.
ORDINANCE NO. S78
AN ORDINANCE OF THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
PROVIDING FOR THE ES-
TABLISHAAENT OF HIS-
TORIC PRESERVATION
DISTRICTS
The Board ol Supervisors of
the County at Riverside, State
of California, do ordain as
tallows:
Section I. PURPOSE AND
INTENT. It is hereby declared
aS a moffer of DuOItc POlicy
that the recognition, protea-
lion, preservation, enhance-
ment, perpetuation and use at
sites and structures within the
hC.o~.nt¥ of Riverside having
ISTOrlC significance iS neces-
sary and reauired in the inter-
est of the health, safety, pros-
parity and general welfare of
the public.'The purpose of this
ordinance is to:
(o) Effect and occomolish
the arasaction, enhancement
and aerDetuation at such
provemerits which reDresent
or reflect signitJcc)nt ele-
ments of the county's
history:
(hi Safeguard the countv's
historicheritage, os em-
bodied anal reflected in
cifJcallv defined Historic
Preservation Districts.
Ic) StaOilize and ireDrove
oroDertv value.
(d) Protect and enhance
the countv's attraction to
residents. tourists and visi.
tars, and serve as o support
and stimulus to business and
industry.
(el Strengthen the economy
of the county.
if) PrOmote the use of His-
toric Preservation Districts
for the education, pleasure,
arosoerlly and welfare of the
peDDle at the county.
Section 2. DEFINITIONS. In
this ordinance, unless the con-
text otherwise reouires, the
following words shall hove the
following meanings:
(o) APPLICANT means
onv Derson who aDolies for
Certificate at Historic Ap-
proofiDleness altecting prop-
arty subject to
thisordinance.
(b) ALTERATION means:
(I) any oct or arocess
which changes or
modifies one or more
of the exterior archi-
tectural features of
an existing structure.
within the boundaries
of o HiSTOriC Preser-
vation District includ-
ir.~, Put not limited to,
exterior changes to,
or moditlcalion of
structure, architec-
tural details, or visual
characteristics such
as paint color and
surfDoe texture;
(2) the placement or re-
moral of any exterior
o~iects such as signs,
pigDues, light fixtures,
sireel turmture, walls,
fences, sleds, plant-
ings and landscoDe aC-
Cessories atfecting the
exterior visual auali-
tJ~ at the GraDarty, or
(3) any new construction
that reauires o Dermis
or entitlement of use
from the County of
Riverside.
(C) BOARD means the
Board of SuPervisors of Riv-
erside County.
(d) CERTIFICATE OF
HISTORIC APPROPRIATE-
NESS means o certificate is-
suea by the Planning De-
partmeat or, on aDocol, by
the Area Planning Council
having iurisdictlon, which
approves Plans for the con-
structie~ or alteration of an
Improvement or o modifica-
tion of use of a specific site
or natural feature within the
boundaries of a Historic
Preservation District.
(e) ELEVATIONS means
the flo~ Scale orthooraanic
orole~ed Growings of all ex-
terior verHcal surfaces of a
buildling.
if) L~XTERIOR ARCHI-
TECTURAL FEATURE
means the architectural de-
Sign, general arrangement
and components of all of the
outer surfaces of an im-
provement, including, but
not limited to, the king, color
and texture of the building
material and the type and
style of oll windows, doors,
lights, signs and other fix-
tures apourtenont to such
Imorovement.
(g) FACADE means the
front, side, rear or super-
structure of o building, or
any port of o building which
is subject to view from a
Public right of way.
(h) HISTORICAL CDM-
AAISSION means the River-
side County Historical
Commission.
(i) HISTORIC PRESERVA-
TION DISTRICT means any
area designated by the
Board of Supervisors os a
historic area that Is su101ect
to the provisions of this
ordinance.
IAAPROVEAAENT
means any building, struc-
ture, place, oarking facility,
fence, gate. wall or other olD-
'leas constituting a physical
betterment of real proDer/v,
or any part of Such
betterment.
(k) PERSON means any
person, firm, corporation or
association.
(I) PLANNING COAAAAIS-
SION means the Riverside
County Planning
Commission.
Section :3. ESTABLISH-
MENT OF HISTORIC PRES-
ERVATION DISTRICTS.
(o) Any person may file 0
reauest that the Historical
Commission study and make
recommendations regarding
the designation of certain
areas of the County having
Saeciol historical signifi-
cance as Historic Preserva-
tion Districts. All such re-
Guests shall be filed with the
Parks Director and shall be
occomoonied by coates of
Riverside County Assessor's
moos clearly delineating the
bounclaries of the oreo fo be
considered as Historic Pres-
ervation District along wHh
o statement of Justification
describing the historical sig-
nificance of the oreo.
(b) The Parks Director
shall study the matter
uOon comoleSion of the re-
view, algae the reauest on
the regular agenda of the
Historical Commission for
Its recommendation.
(c) Uoon completion of its
revmw, the Historical Com-
mission shall make a recom-
menEaSton on the proposal
and tarward it to the Plan-
ning Director. The Historical
Commission shall reCOm-
mend that an area be desig-
nated as a Historic Preser-
vation District only if It
determines that there is a
factual basis to make one or
more of the findings Ilstea in
sub-section :f) of this
section.
(d) Uoon receipt of o rec-
ommendation from the His-
torical Commission, the
Planning Director shall re-
view the molter and shall
cause the prooasDi to be en-
vironmentally assessed, in-
cluding the oreooration of an
environmental impact re-
Dart, if required, and upon
completion thereof shall set
the matter for a DuDlie hear-
ing before the Planning
Commission.
(e) The Planning Commis-
sion shall hold o public hear.
ing on the proposed Historic
Preservation District and
shall make a racommerida.
lion to the BoarO of Supervl.
sots as to whether the pro-
Dosed district Is in
conformity with the pur-
poses and Criteria of the His-
toric Preservation Element
of The Riverslad County Gan.
eral Plan and otherwise
meets the crHerlo set forth
in this ordinance for the es-
tobllshment of a district in-
Cluding its ~eco.mmendotlon
radarElna the findings re-
quired in sub-section if) of
this section. Notice of the
time and place of the public
hearing before the Planning
Commission, Including a
general description of the
oreo and exolonatlon of the
matter to be considered shall
be given at least 10 calendar
days before the hearing by
publication once In a news-
pader of general circulation,
published and circulated In
the county and bY Dosting a
notice In consolcuous places
located within the bound-
aries of the orooosed Histor-
ic Preservation District not
less than 10 days prior to the
hearing.
(f) UPon receipt of a recom-
mendalan from the Planning
Commission, the Clerk of the
Board shall place the matter
uoon the regular agenda of the
Board of Sugarvisors for de-
termination bv the Board as to
whether It desires to Iqold a
puOllc hearing on the matter.
If the Board determines to
hold o auGIlL hearing, not less
than 14 daYS prior to the date
of the hearing, the Clerk of the
Board shall mall to every
ooertv owner within the
undarles of the proPascal
Historic Preservation District,
at the addresses shown on the
last eauollze~ assessment Fall,
O notice of hearing and shall
file on affidavff In the pro-
Dosed district file verifying
that the mailing has been com-
pleted. All Such notices shall
Include the time and olace of
the hearing, a Gescrlptlon of
the oreo to be Included In the
proposed district, an exolono-
tlon of the ourDose of this
district
a brief description of the type
of restrictions thor'will be
plied to oil aroaertv In the dis-
trict, and o statement that oral
and written protests to the
Dosed formation will be con-
sidered at the hearing. After
closing tl'~e public hearing, the
Board shall make its decision
regarding the formation of the
proposed district within a rea-
sonable time thereafter; pro-
vided, however, o district shall
be established only if the
Board makes one or more at
the following findings regard-
Ing the area being considered:
(1) The area exemplifies or
reflects significant
iects of the cultutah
ticoh economic or Social
history of the nation,
state or county, or
(2) The area is Identified
with historic personages
or with linoartant
events In national, State
or lOCal histor"v, or
~3) The area emb~lies the
distinguishing charac-
teristics of a significant
architectural Period
which is inherently valu-
DOle for the study of ar-
chitecture unlaue to the
history of the county,
state, or notion.
(g) Notwithstanding the
above, if the Board finds our.
ing the p~OIIc hearings that
orotests have ~ made bv
the owners of real proDarty
within the Proposed Historic
Preservation District, the
sessed value of which,
shown by the last eauallzed as-
sessment roll, constitutes
more than one-half of the total
assessed value of the real
proDarty within the oro~osecl
district, the proaee¢llngs shall
be immediately terminated
and the BoDrd shall not, for
one year mereafter, com-
mence any proceedings relat-
Ing to the formation of a HIs-
toric Preservatlo~ Oislrlct
Involving any DartIon of the
real oroDerty owned tw any
Derson flung a protest.
(hi All reauests to terminate,
or modify the bounclorles of an
established Historic Prmrvo-
lion District Shell 0e made In
writing directly to the Board
of SuOervisors, stating the rea-
sons therefor. The Board may
accept or reject a request
without any hearing thereon;
provided, however, if o re-
Guest. Is accepteel, the matter
shall then be referred to the
Parks Director for processing
in the same manner as for the
formation of a district. When-
ever a reauest for modified*
Ilon or termination of on es-
ol~llshed district is acteDted
bY the Board and Is ultimately
set for hearing before the
Board, Pursuant to sub-section
If) of this section, every argo-
· arty owner within the estob-
Ilshecl district shall receive no-
tice of the hearing on the
maffer.
SeCtIDa 4, L.OCAL. REVIEW
BOARD.
(o) E~.h historic Preserva-
tion District that Is estat)-
Ilshad shall have o local Re-
view Board composed of $
members° ooDolntecl by the
Board of Supervisors, who.
shall serve without GaY. One
member shall be knowledge-
able In architectural and
construction techniques and
t~nll members shall exhibit an
terest in and knowledge of
the history and architecture
of the Historic Preservation
District. Members shall be
ol~x)inted for terms of 2
eears, except that 2 roam-
rs Initially oaDolnted to
the Review Board shall be
appointed for one-year terms
so that the number of terms
expiring [t any year shall
not differ ov more than one
from the number of terms
expiring In any other year.
(b) The local Review Board
shall hold regular public
meetings and establish such
rules as may be o~roDriate
or necessary for the GrEatly
conduct of Its business. At its .
first meeting, the appointed
members shall elect officers
who shall serve for terms of
one year. Three members
shall constitute a aUGrUm,
and decisions of the Review
Board shall be determined
by malorltv vote of those
members at any meeting.
s~ac) The local Review Board
II have the following
er~ and duties In addition to
those otherwise provided in
this ordinance:
(I) Provide /or ore-appli-
cation conferences
with individuals inter-
estecl in constructing
or altering proDarty
within the Historic
Preservation DIstrict.
The purpose of these
conferences shall be to
familiarize the ODDti-
tanS with the historic
significance and relat-
edcons/ruction theme
of the district.
(2) Recommend 'imple-
mentation guidelines
and standards to be
used by the local Re-
view Board In the re-
view of am)Ucations,
which shatl be sub-
misted to the Plan-
ning Director for a
determination of con-
slstencv with the His-
toric Preservation
Element of the River-
side Courtly General
Plan. The oDorarea
guidelines shall be
used by the local Re-
view Board anci the
Planning Depot truant
OS the basis of OD-
Droving or denying
applications tar a
Certificate of Historic
Appropriateness. The
joldellnes shall con-
in drawings and
pt'totngraphs or
ductIons thereof, In-
zlUC~ing a standard-
easurvev of historic
sites and I~tructures
which will serve os
general guides of ac-
ce~tae)le construction
within the district.
(3) Explore means for the
protection, retention,
and use of any signifi-
cant structures, natu-
ral features, sites and
areas In the district in-
cludlng, but not limit-
ed to, appropriate leg-
Islation and financing
by indeemndent fun~
ing organizations, or
other private, local,
state, or federal
assistance.
(4) Serve as an advisory
resaurce._to 011 agen-
cies of Tno county in
matters oarlathing to
the district, and to en-
courage efforts by,
~ cooaeration with,
Individuals, private
organizations and oth-
er governmental agen-
cies concerned with
preservation of the
dJslrlct's architectur-
al, environmental, and
cultural heritage.
(5) Render advice and
guidance, UPOn re-
guest of the oroDer'ty
owner or occupant re-
gardtng construction,
restoration, alter.
allan, decoration,
landscaping, ~r main-
tenanco of any struc-
ture, natural feature,
site, or area within
the district.
(6) To encourage public
unaerstandlng and
Oreclarion of the
unique architectutah
environmental, and
cultural heritage of the
community through
educational and inter-
pretative programs.
Section $. BUILDING PER-
MITS; PROHIBITION
(a) Withtn the boundaries
of an adootecl Historic Pres-
ervation District, no building
or structure shall be con-
structed or altered and no
building permit, excegt for
permits for gemgillian of a
building, shall be issued by
the Director of Building and
$afe~ unless a Certificate of
Historic ADproorloteness is
first issued by the Planning
Director or granted on
Deal by an Area Planning
Council.
(b} Within the boundaries
of on oclooted Historic Pres-
ervation District, no person
~ehall alter. or cause to be ai-
red, construct, or cause to
be constructed, any building
or structure, excegt in strict
comallaoce with the plans
aDoroved in coniunction with ·
the ISSUance of a Certificate
of HIstoric Aoorooriateness.
(c) Nothing in this section
shall be construed so as to
exempt any person from
complying .with any other'
provision o[ Iffi.
SeCIIQn 6. APPLICATION
FOR CERTIFICATE OF HIS-
TORIC APPROPRIATENESS.
An aoplicatlon for a Certifi-
cate of Historic Aoaropriate-
hess, authorizing the construc-
tion or alteration of o building
.or structure within o Historic
Preservation District, shall be
made in accordance with the
following ~rocedure:
(a) Any owner, or Derson
authorized by the owner, of a
oarcol of argoarty, Imoroved
or unimm'oved. may request
the Issuance of o Certificate
of Historic APProPriateness
bv filing with the Planning
Director on aoolication for a
certificate on the form fur-
hisheel bY the Planning De-
Partment. NO aoolicatton
shall be accoatoLl bv the
Planning Director for pro-
cessing unless m:comDanied
by a filing fee of $100, sucn
dafo and other Information
as is required by the Plan-
ning Director, including any
required environmental
umentatlon, ancI drawings
slgne~l bY any architect re-
tS~ sib~le for the construc.
alteration of the
building or structure. The
drawings must be In suffi-
cient detail to meaningfully
show, insofar as they relate
to exterior aOoearonces, the
grolx~ea archilec/ural
sl~n, incIu~lioa elevations,
pr --~,M~I robSerials, t. ex-
lures, and COlors, Inclualng
samales of materials or col.
ors and the plot Dion or site
layout, inclucling all Ira.
Drovemerits affecting
Dearantes, such as walls,
walks, terraces, plantings,
accessory buildings, signs,
lights, and other elements.
lb) UPon receipt of a cam-
Dieted application, the Plan.
ning Director shall transmit
a coov of the agpllcation to
the local Review Board, the
Historical Commission and
any other aeaartment or
agency deemed necessary
by the Director, each of
which shall have 30 days to
submit written comments to
the Planning Director.
(c) The Planning Director
shall aDorove or deny an ao-
Dlication for a certificate
within 30 days after the expi-
ration of time for written
comments and shall give no-
lice of the decision, by mall,
to the applicant, together
with any required conditions
of oDoroval. The Planning
Director shall also mail a
co~v thereof to the Historical
Commission, the local
,view Board and all persons
and organizations that have
tiled on annual written re-
guest to be notified of any
such decisions within a
specified Historic Preserva-
tion District and who have
paid on annual fee to cover
the costs involved.
(d) No aPPliCatIon for o
Certificate of Historic AD-
prooflateness shall be
proved unless the Planning
Director, or on agpeol, the
Area Planning Council hav-
Ing lurlsdlctlon, finds that
the Proposed construction or
alteration is consistent with
and conforms to the
lives and design criteria Set
forth in the H~storlc Preset*
varian Element of the River-
side Count~ General Plan
and the guidelines and stan-
dards of the local Review"-
Board that relate to the soe-
elf to Historic Preservation
District In which the
Dosed construction Is
located.
Seelion 7. APPEALS.
The goaliconS, or any Inter-
ested person mov aPPeal tO
the Area Planning Council
having lurisdlCtlon over the
DartIon of the county where
rne project is located, any fi-
nal decision of the Planning
Director to grant or deny on
oogllcatlon for a Certificate of
Historic Aporoprlateness. All
oogeols must be filed within 15
days after the Planning Dlrec.
tar has Issued a decision, must
be in writing on the forms pro-
vlded by the Planning Pegart-
mens and must be occomoo-
nled bv a filing fee of S60.
Upon receipt of a completed
aDocol, the Area Planning
Council Secretary shall set the
molter for hearing before the
Area Planning Council not less
than 10 days nor more than 3S
days thereafter and shall give
written notice of the hearing to
the ODDaligns, the applicants,
the local Review Board and oil
~orSOns and organizations who
ve filed an annual written
request to be notified at any
oDDaais within o specified His-
toric Preservation District and
who have paid the fee to cover
the costs involved. The Area
Planning Council shall render
Its decision within 35 days fol-
lowing the close of the hearing
on the
Sectloft I. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, suP-section,
paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance Is for
any reason held to Oe Invalid
or unconstitutional, such Inva-
lidity or unconstltutlonalltv
shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of the re.
maintrig oortlo~s of this oral-
nonce, it Peing expressly
clarea'that this oralnonce and
each section, sub-section,
Doragraph, sentence, clause
onO phrase thereof waula have
been adoglad, Irresoeclive of
the fact that one or more other
section, suP-section, para-
graph, Sentence, clause or
phrase be declared Invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section f. LEGAL PROCE-
DURE; PENALTY FOR
VIOLATION.
(a) Any bullall'rig or struc-
ture constructed or altered
contrary to the gravisloftS of
this ordinance shall be, and
the some Is here~w daclared
to be, unlawful and a public
' nuisance and the District At-
tamer shall Immediately
commence action or actions,
proceeding or proceedings
for the abatement, removal
and enloinment thereof, In
the manner provided by law;
and shall take sucfi other
stoa, s, and shall apgl¥ to
SUCh court or courts as may
have lurlsdictlan to. grant
such relief as will agate or
remove such building, struc*
Sure or use and restrain and
ertlgin any oarson from set-
ting Ha, erecting or main-
talnlng such building or
structure, or using any grog-
arty contrary to the Provi-
sions of this ordinance.
(b) All remedies Provided
for herein shall be ~dmulQ-
tire and not exclusive. The
conviction and Punishment
of any person hereunder
shall not relieve such person
from the responsibility of
correcting prohibited condi-
tions or removing prohibited
buildings, structures or Im-
provements, nor prevent the
enforced correction or re-
moval thereof.
(c) Any person, firm or cor-
poration violating any of the
provisions of this ordinance
or of any permit or exception
granted hereunder shah be
deemed guilty of a misde-
meanor and upon conviction
thereof, shall I~e Punishable
bv a fine not to exceed
/~00.00 or by Imprisonment
in the County Jailnot to ex-
ceed six months, or by both
Such fine and Impfigment.
Section 10.
This ordinance shall take ef-
fect 30 days after the dote of
Its adoorion.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF RIV-
eRSlOE, STATE OF
ALIFORNIA
B~hWALT ABRAHAM
airman
ATTEST:
DONALD D. SULLIVAN
Clerk
By DeWana Waples
Deputy
I HEREBY CERTIFY that
a! o regular meeting of the
board of SuPorvlsors of said
county held on October 23,
1979, the foregoing ordinance
consisting of Ten (10) seelions
was aclooted by said ~oard by
the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Record,
McCandless0 Younglava and
Abraham.
NOES: None,
ABSENT: SuPervisor
~[~L°~or'
DATED: October 23, 1979
DONALD O. SULLIVAN
Clerk of the Board
BV DeWaria W~les
Oeautv
!1/6
Temecula
Historic
District"
~ no scale
BOUNDARY
EXCLUDED
AREA
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
HTG: 7~'3~90
DEPT:
TITLE:
Bister Cit~ Pro~ra~
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
RECOI~ENDiITTON:
1. Appoint a chairperson for a Sister City Committee·
Invite interested individuals to participate on this committee
to explore the possibility of affiliating with Sister Cities,
International.
BACEGROUND:
City Council has asked staff to research ways in which Temecula can
become involved in a "Sister City Program". Included with this
staff report is information on the Sister Cities International
organization.
FIBC~L II~PACT:
Should the Council choose to affiliate with this organization the
fees, based on population, range from $100 to $925.
JSG
" TF ITIES sister
THE U.S. SIS
ORGANIZATI0 ,
PURPOSE:
Sister Citi~ International (principal program of the ~own Affiliation Association of th~ U.S., Inc.) is dedicated to the
goal of fu~be~ng ~obal understandin~ Dy encouraging and ~sisi'~g U.S~ co~Gnities and their cit~¢ns to l~k with
si~lar eommu~tim ~roughout the world.
An ~liation d~wlo~ when an American community of whatever size or character officially links with a ~ommunity in
anotber nation. ~c goal for the communities involved is to learn more about each other an~ to dewlop I~ting and
mcanin~ul cxch~g~. ~ ideal affiliation involves a large number of citizens and organizations in Doth communities
cnga~ng ~ cxch~ of ~ople, idc~ and cultures on a long-term, continuin~ D~is.
~ national ~s~iation provides a mechanism for U.S. communities to enter this program Dy assisting them in the
press of linking ~th a community in another country. It acts ~ a coordinator and cat~yst to cncourag¢ v~ons ty~s
of sister ~ti~ ~ti~ti~ ~d se~es as a clearinghouse to gather, anMyze and share i~ormation, research and know]edge.
HISTORY:
Affiliations between cities in the United States and other countries began shortly after 1945, but no real national focus
was realized until 1956 when President Dwight D. Eisenhower initiated the People-to-People Program at the White
House. Out of this grew Sister Cities International which has assisted more than 870 U.S. cities and counties,
representing over 125 million Americans, establish links with some 1,400 communities in 92 other nations of the world.
MEMBERSHIP:
Sister Cities International is a tax-exempt, non-profit organization incorporated in the District of Columbia in 1967. The
association has five categories of membership: Government member, Ambassador Association, Individual member,
Service/Institutional member, and Corporate Sustaining member.
Association activities are also supported by private contributions, foundation grants and by funding support from the
U.S. Information Agency and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
LEADERSHIP:
A 34 member board of directors governs Sister Cities International with assistance from an international executive
board. The board of directors is composed of 24 elected members; six directors appointed by the president, with the
approval of the board; one director elected each year by the National Youth Program Assembly to serve as the youth
representative and the dean of the Ambassador Association who serves for a one year term on the board. There are 1 !
officers- a president, a chairman of the board, a chairman of the executive committee, six vice-presidents, a secretary and
treasurer. The 24 elected directors are elected at-large by and from the membership of the association at the annual
business session -- eight directors each year for three-year terms.
A nation-wide system of state coordinators and state level management teams provides services to member cities
throughout the United States and coordinates workshops to assist in training programs. State coordinators are
appointed by the SCI board of directors.
ACTIVITIES:
In addition to policy, program development and member services, the organization coordinates and facilitates several
major activities. They are: technical assistance programs with developing nations; youth and education programs; special
conference programs; assistance in formalizing new affiliations; research and information service; the annual
Eisenhower International Golf Classic and Eisenhower Scholarship Program; the Reader's Digest annual awards
program; the Kanazawa Scholarship Program for entrepreneurial and practical trainee exchange; and leadership
development training programs.
MEETINGS:
The association holds an annual conference in the summer which focuses on national and international issues. The
annual conference alternates between East and West of the United States. In addition, state and regional workshops and
training seminars are held to increase program skills at other times of the year.
Sister Cities International
120 South Payne Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
For ft~rlhcr illl'Orlllillioll coiltact:
Telephone: !-703-836-3535 ~
Facsimile: 1-703-836-4815
Telex: 40 ! 565
Easylink: 62885879
The Sister City Concept
"The Sister City Program is an important re-
source to the negotiotions o.f 9overnments in letting
the people themselues giue expression to their
common desire for .friendship, good will, and
cooperation .for a better world.for all"
--President Dwight D. Eisenhower
Town affiliations between the Untied ,Stales
and olher countries began shortly after World
War I1, and soon became popularly known as
Sister Cities. The program became a national
effort when President Eisenhower proposed
the People-to-People program at a White
House Conference in 1956. His idea was to
involve people and organized groups at all
levels of our society in personal diplomacy.
One of the groups formed as a result of the
People-to-People concept was the Civic Com-
mittee, established to promote Sister City
relations on a national scale. At the request of
the Civic Committee, the National League of
Cities, representing more than 15,000 cities,
towns, and villa~s in the U.S., agreed to serve
as a clearinghouse in expanding the Sister City
concept among its members.
In the first few years of the prog~,m~, a dozen
active affiliations were started. In the early
1960's, the number of city affiliations began to
increase rapidly and it became clear that a qew
national organization devoted exclusively to
lhe support of the Sister City program was
needed.
In 1965, delegates to a Western Regional
Sister City Conference in Portland, Oregon,
unanimously supported the establishment of a
national organization. The League of California
Cities and the League of Oregon Cities
adopted resolutions supporting the idea. The
Executive Committee of the National League
of Cities followed suit at its meeting late in 1965.
In response, the Town Affiliation Association
of the United States, Inc., was officially
incorporated on June 12, 1967, as a non-profit
corporation in the District of Columbia, de-
fined in its articles of incorporation as a
"membership organization to foster better
international understanding and cooperation
through Sister City relationships."
The Town Affiliation Association (TAA) is
governed by a board of twenty-five directors
elected by the membership. Voting member-
ship in the Association is held by cities, state
associations of municipalities, the National
League of Cities, other units of local govern-
ments and local Sister City Committees which
pay annual dues and are responsible for carm-
ing out an affiliation with a foreign community.
Sister Cities International (SCI) has evolved
as the principal program of the Town Affiliation
Association. Although the TAA title is still used
on corporate documents, Sister Cities Inter-
national is the name now widely used and
recogNzed as descriptive of the Sister City
concept.
SCI program development is handled by a
professional staff with years of service in other
nations and the Sister Cities movement. The
Washington headquarters is directed by an
executive vice president, and sector directors
are responsible for specific program develop-
rnent. A network of SCl representatives and
regional vice presidents provide close contact
and advice to local programs. They are avail-
able to assist any individual, organization, or
community wishing to join the program.
How To Build A Sister Cities Program In Your Community
What Is A Sister City?
When an American community of whatever size or charac-
ter joins with a community in another nation to learn more
about the other and to develop friendly and meaningful
exchanges, the two may propose a formal affiliation. The
ideal affiliation involves a large number of dtizens and organi-
zations in both communities engaged in continuing projects
of mutual interest.
This interchange helps to further international understand-
ing at all levels of the community on a continuing long-term
~-~asis. Within the program dries and their citizens exchange
.~ople, ideas and culture in a variety of educational institu-
aonal, munidpal, professional, technical and youth projects.
The Sister City program as a national concept was
launched at the White House in 1956 when President Dwight
D. Eisenhower called for massive exchanges between Amer-
icans and the peoples of other lands.
Hundreds of American dries responded and today are
carrying out meaningful exchanges with their affiliates in 86
nations of the world.
Why Have A Sister City?
A Sister City program helps the dtizens of both com-
munilies become directly involved in international relations
in unique and rewarding exchanges which benefit everyone.
it enables all who participate to:
· Exchange ideas and develop friendship with their coun-
terparts in another culture on a direct personal basis.
· Establish an idenlity as members of tbe family of man
involved in the constructive process of building world
peace.
· Develop a way for the many and diverse elements of
every community to come together to enjoy and profit
fi'om a cooperative program.
Open new dialogues with the people of another culture
to find unique solutions to improving the quality of urban
life.
Participate in a program with a real partner in another
country so all members of the community can feel they
are contributing to intemational understanding in a direct
personal way.
· Better understand their own community by interpreting
their way of life to the people of another culture.
What To Do First?
Hundreds of U.S. communities of all sizes have discovered
the rewards of participating in an international program
where each and every member can and does realize deep
personal satisfaction. Your community can join this growing
movement, but first you have to develop support for the
idea in your own community.
This can be easy and fun. And, you will have a lot of help
from Sister Cities International- the national organization
of Sister Cities in the U.S.- as well as from hundreds of
volunteer leaders throughout the country who are available
to share their experiences with you based on their own par-
ticipation in the program.
The Sister City concept, like all good programs, must have
broad support and understanding if it is to succeed. If your
community understands the program, it can succeed and
the rewards will be well worth the effort.
No catalog could possibly list all the ways in which Sister
Cities operate because the variety of exchanges possible are
only limited by the imagination and resources of the two
communities.
Two principal objectives to keep in mind when planning
your activites are:
· You don't establish and maintain friendships by a single
effort. It requires continuing activity.
· You do establish such continuity by a broad base of
activity in which many people and organzations partici-
pate.
'The .Steps In Building A Sister Cities Program
Discuss the sister city idea with
friends and community leaders,
then call a meeting of those in-
terested. The key to a successful
Sister City program is broad local
support and this logically comes
from community organizations
and institutions. "i
;2. After you have determined
local interest, ask your commu-
nity leaders to inform their organi-
zations about the idea. They
should discuss the program at
their own meetings and assess the
kind of activity their organizations
could support. For example, edu-
cational representatives might
agree to develop a school-to-
school program.
3. After the initial meetings, re-
.guest that your mayor and council
~port a proposal to establish an
~,~iliation with a community in
another nation. Form a commit-
tee to include the broadest possi-
ble community representation.
Appoint a chairperson who is
knowledgeable and active in local
affairs. An ad hoc group should
be ~stablished to study possible
sister city choices.
4. The process of determining
where in the world to seek a sister
city is very important and de-
serves careful attention from you
and your committee. The more
people who participate in the
selection process, the more who
will actively support the relation-
ship. Sister Cities International
(SCI) maintains a list of cities
around the world that have ex-
--~essly asked for a U.S. sister city
;[ will fo~vard that information
to you. If any of the cities on the
list is of interest to your communi-
ty, contact SCI and any additional
available information on that city
will be forwarded to you to assist
you in making the final decision.
If no listed city seems to be an
appropriate match for your com-
munity, SCI will forward infor-
mation on your city to one of its
many counterpart organizations
abroad, depending on which re-
gion of the world is of interest to
your city. A potential sister city
may then be located by advertis-
ing your city directly to foreign
cities in contact with their counter-
part organizations.
5. The process of forming a sister
affiliation can take anywhere from
six months to two years. Com-
munications, development of a
local program, involvement of
municipal officials--these are
some of the many factors which
affect the length of the affiliations
process. Avoid premature public-
ity because if publicized arrange-
ments fail to work out, enthusiasm
is likely to dissipate.
6. During this interim stage-
your committee should consider
establishing itself as a private,
non-profit organization and apply-
ing for a 501(c) (3) status from the
Internal Revenue Service. This will
help ensure program continuity
and will assist your committee in
raising funds necessary to conduct
the Sister City program.
7. When you have selected a city
as a possible candidate and you
are ready to invite that city to be-
come your sister city, you should
send an exploratory letter to elicit
the feeling in that city about a rela-
tionship with your community.
SCI will forward to you a sample
letter of invitation and a city coun-
cil resolution supporting the pro-
posed affiliation. You should
adapt these documents to state
your city's reasons for entering
the program and for choosing the
foreign city. You should state your
goals and proposed activities for
the program and should ask the
foreign city to do the same. An
invitation for community leaders
to visit your city would be well
received if included in the letter.
A visit by citizens from your city
to the prospective sister city dur-
ing this stage could expedite the
process. It is advisable to send any
correspondence in both English
and the language of your poten-
tial sister city.
8. Send the letter of invitation
and supporting resolution to your
prospective sister city along with
informational material that will
properly introduce your commu-
nity to the foreign city and convey
a sense of what your community
has to offer in a sister city relation-
ship. Send copies of these letters
to Sister Cities International, to
the U.S. Embassy in that country
and to the foreign embassy in
Washington, D.C. SCl will write
an offidal letter supporting the af-
filiation once copies of the
mayor's letter has been received.
SCI can also use diplomatic ser-
vices for communications pur-
poses if there is a problem estab-
lishing and receiving correspon-
dence from the sister city. Once
acceptance letters and council re-
solutions have been exchanged
with your sister city, send copies
to SCI. Upon receipt of these
documents, SCI will then list the
affiliation as official and add it to
the SCI Directory of Sister Cities
by State and Country. SCI char-
ters will be sent to you recognizing
your new affiliation, which can be
exchanged with your sister city.
"Everyone Can Participate
Nearly every member of the community, young or old,
belongs to some kind of organization or another. Nearly
- ~one has a hobby, goes to school, belongs to a service
~ofessionai society, works tn a business or industry, vol-
unteers his or her time'in any number of local organizations
which can be linked to counterparts in another country.
Thus, the finking of ski~s, crafts and interests of people and
organizations in both dries can open new avenues of program
adventure.
The concept is simple once two titles have taken the initial
step of actually affiliating as sister dries. A catalog of organi-
zations should be developed which will give you an idea of
the potential areas of exchange possible. Don't forget to
include your schools, hobby groups, business and profes-
sional organizations, scouting groups, service clubs, etc. This
list can then be sent to your affiliate to determine what organi-
zations they have in their community to match yours. !n
some cases, a similar organization won't exist. Perhaps you
can start one. After comparing lists, the way is open for club
and organizational affiliations which work to get the largest
number of people Involved in a relatively short period of
time and help spread the word about your international
involvement to virtually all segments of your community. It
may be helpful to have each organization extend an invitation
to ils counterpart organization through the adoption of a
formal resolution of affiliation. Each affiliated organization
carries out its own program within the sister dty framework
and with guidance by the overall Sister City Commiffee, thus
allowing each proson to individually become a part of a
pel~son-to-person... organization-to-organization... city-to-
approach to international diplomacy.
IIIIII1!
Above all, remember that the uniqueness of the Sister
City Program is that it is two-way. The give and take is
shared by both communities through planned and continu-
ous contact.
Projects You Can Do
Sister City programs and projects are developed.. out of
mutual desires and interest. There is no cut-and-dried pat-
tern. Projects are limited only by the imagination and re-
sources of the communities. Through visits and exchange
of correspondence, cities discuss the types of projects they
would like to carry out. When one or more projects are
agreed upon, the program is carried out by the dtizens on
both sides.
!n beginning the program, a community may wish to start
by sending a group of 8 x 10 inch photographs or slides, of
its city along with background material. Remember, language
barriers can be overcome by various visual presentations.
The affiliate may want to publish these in the local news-
paper. You should ask for photos and news of the dry so
your local newspaper can acquaint your own dtizens with
your sister city.
The following are some of the types of projects which
have been carried out successfully by other communities.
The projects you decide on may be more comprehensive
than this brief list, depending upon your community re-
sources and ingenuity.
· Exchanges of visitors, offdais, prominent dtizens, musi-
dans, students, teachers, professionals, news reporters, radio
and 'IV, labor, etc.
· Organized tours. Hospitality and ceremonies for visiting
groups.
· Club affiliations. Development of relations between such
groups as Lions, Rotary, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, women's
clubs, and hobby clubs, etc., with their counterparis in the
sister city.
· Letter writing. When exchanging correspondence with a
community that speaks another language, a Language Re-
source Committee is essential. Other than face-to-face visits,
one of the most important ways of exchanging ideas with
overseas contacts is through the personal letter.
· School affiliations can be a stimulating activity if organized
within your educational system. They can be a strong adjunct
to your school's language, history, cultural and other prog-
rams. There is no end to the fascinating projects young
people can engage in to enlarge their horizons of learning.
· Technical and professional exchanges can have benefits
to both communities far in excess of the limited costs in-
volved. Many U.S. dries and their affiliates have exchanged
experts in transportation, housing, medical systems, etc.
· Radio contacts between sister cities can be made by
amateur radio operators. Spedai broadcasts on records or
tape can be made for use abroad.
· Art exhibits. Both school children and members of local
art clubs exchange art work with their overseas counterparts.
The material is often exhibited in public buildings and mer-
chants' windows in both communities.
· Photo exhibits. Camera clubs exchange collections of stills,
slides and documentary motion pictures.
· Sending of mementos, not on a charitable basis, but of
mutual interest and respect. Gifts are generally modest ones.
· Exchange of music, recordings and plays.
· Publications and preparation of food recipes from the
foreign country.
The Role of
Sister Cities International
Sister Cities International (SCl) the principal program of
the Town Affiliation Association of the U.S., Inc., a tax-
exempt, non-profit organization, headquartered in Alexan-
dria, Virginia, fosters international cooperation and under-
standing through Sister City relationships between cities in
the United States and other nations. SCI was created by
participating U.S. cities to provide a forum through which
its membership could express their concerns and actively
work to meet the challenge of bettering international relations
in the wodd today.
Sister Cities International gives the community a central
clearing point to which It can turn to obtain assistance and
information about programs. It provides direct contact with
embassies, government agencies and organizational re-
sources in the United States and throughout the world.
SCI can assist you to start your program and help you
carry out the many exchanges possible by providing you
with information and advice when needed. A single commu-
nity trying to do the job alone does not have the resources,
but in cooperation with many communities, and with the
resources of the national association, these goals can be
accomplished.
.-- Sister Cities International is a membership organization
d charges a minimum fee to cover the expense of publi-
~ons and consulting senaces to assist U.S. communities
that are forming new affiliations. Membership dues are usu-
ally paid by the city, the Chamber of Commerce or the local
sister cities committee. A dty pays half of the annual dues
as a service fee during the initial stage of program formation.
The remainder is paid once the affiliation has been finalized.
SCI maintains a schedule of dues based on population, rang-
ing from $100 to $925.
For further information or assistance, contact:
sister
120 South Payne Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Tel.:' (703) 836-3535
The new headquarters building of Sister Cities International
in Alexandria, Virginia.
(Detach and return to Sister Cities International, 120 South Payne Street Alexandria, VA 22314)
Yes, I would like more Information on how our city can get involved in the Sister Cities program.
Send to:
Name
Title
Address
City State
Room or No.
Zip
7o help us help you, please complete this portion:
Population of your city
Economic Base
City or countn7 where you might be interested in forming a link
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ) TITLE: DEPT HD
HTG: 3
DEPT~!M! ~0 Oenerml Services &greement CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
RECO~!~END~.TION:
Authorize the Mayor to enter into an agreement with the County of
Riverside to provide General Services as required by the City.
BACKGROUND~
The County of Riverside has provided the City with a General
Services Agreement, which allows the City to contract for a number
of services with the County on an as-needed basis. This agreement
has been approved by County Counsel and City Attorney Field as to
form.
Fiscal Impact would be determined at the time specific services are
requested by the City Council.
JSG
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
COUNTY COUN.~EL
OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY COUNSEL
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
3535 TENTH STREET, SUITE 300
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 9;:'501-3674
TELEPHONE (714) 787-E421
June 21, 1990
Scott Field, City Attorney
City of Temecula
City Attorney Office
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92390
RE: General Services Agreement
Dear Mr. Field:
We are forwarding the attached agreement for execution by the
City Council.
It is our intent to place this on the Board of Supervisors Agenda
as soon as possible after receipt. Subsequent to approval of
this agreement, it may be appropriate to discuss individual
agreements for one/some of the services to be rendered.
Please let us know if we can be of any further assistance in
initiating this relationship.
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
County Counsel
Joe S. Rank
Deputy County Counsel
JSR:st
2511it
cc: Ken Mohr, Administrative Office
2
3
4
General Services Aqreement
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JILL1AM C, KATZENSTEIN
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE 300
3S35. 10TH STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on
between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, herein called "County", and the
CITY OF TEMECULA, herein called "City",
that for and in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants herein contained, and of Article I, Chapter 1, Part 2,
Division 1, Title 5 of the Government Code, County agrees,
through its respective officers and departments, to perform all
functions of City relating to or performed for County by said
officers or departments, respectively, as hereinafter provided
for, except as to any service which is now or may hereafter be
made the subject of a separate contract with City and for which
other provisions are in such contract made, or which is performed
pursuant to other provisions of law not involving a contract.
The following terms and conditions shall govern the
performance of all municipal functions performed hereunder:
1. By reason of the limitations upon the expenditure
of County funds provided for in Section 6 of Article XVI of the
Constitution of California, City shall pay to County the entire
cost to County of performing each such function, including
salaries and wages of all employees engaged therein, all
supervision over such employees while so employed, a prorate of
all departmental overhead, clerical work, office supplies,
depreciation on machinery and equipment, traveling expenses,
including mileage of employees, and all other cost and expense
incidental to the performance of each of such functions, as
determined by County. The cost of each function may be
recomputed annually and the charge revised accordingly thereafter.
In computing the cost of the use of machinery and
equipment, the full cost to County of rented machinery and
equipment and any operator furnished therewith, and a reasonable
rental rate on County-owned machinery and equipment shall be
included.
2. No County officer or department shall perform for
City any function not coming within the scope of the duties of
such officer or department in performing services for County.
3. No service shall be performed hereunder unless City
shall have available funds previously appropriated to cover the
cost thereof.
4. No function or service shall be performed hereunder
-1-
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
VILLIANI C. KATZENSTEIN
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE 300
~ - IOTH STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
by any County officer or department unless such function or
service shall have been:
a. requested in writing by City on order of the
City Council thereof or such officer as it may
designate; and
b. approved by the Board of Supervisors of
County, or such officer as it may designate; and
c. written evidence of the request and approval
exchanged.
Each such service or function shall be performed at the
times and under circumstances which do not interfere with the
performance of regular County operations.
5. All persons employed in the performance of such
services and functions for City shall be County employees, and no
City employees as such shall be taken over by County, and no
person employed hereunder shall have any City pension, civil
service, or other status or rights.
For the purpose of performing such services and
functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the
performance thereof, every County officer and employee engaged in
performing any such service or function shall be deemed to be an
officer or employee of City while performing service for City
within the scope of this agreement.
6. City shall not be called upon to assume any
liability for the direct payment of any salary, wages, or other
compensation to any County personnel performing services
hereunder for City, or any liability other than that provided for
in this agreement.
Except as herein otherwise specified, City shall not be
liable for compensation or indemnity to any County employee for
injury or sickness arising out of his employment.
7. County, its officers, agents, and employees, shall
not be deemed to assume any liability for the negligence of City,
or of any officer, agent or employee thereof, nor for any
defective or dangerous condition of the streets or property of
City, and City shall indemnify and hold County and its officers,
agents and employees harmless from, and shall defend said County
and the officers, agents and employees thereof against, any claim
or suit for damages resulting therefrom.
8. Each County officer or department performing any
service for City provided for herein shall keep reasonably
itemized and in detail work or job records covering the cost of
all services performed, including salary, wages and other
compensation for labor, supervision and planning, plus overhead,
the reasonable rental value of all County-owned machinery and
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jil I JAM C. KATZENSTEIN
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE ~0
~ - lOTH STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
equipment, rental paid for all rented machinery or equipment,
together with the cost of an operator thereof when furnished with
said machinery or equipment, the cost of all machinery and
supplies furnished by County, reasonable handling charges, and
all additional items of expense incidental to the performance of
such function or service.
9. All work done hereunder is subject to the
limitations of the provisions of Section 23008 of the Government
Code, and in accordance therewith, before any work is done or
services rendered pursuant hereto, an amount equal to the cost or
an amount 10% in excess of the estimated cost must be reserved by
City from its funds to insure payment for work, services and
materials provided hereunder.
Each County officer or department performing any service
hereunder shall render to City at the close of each calendar
month an itemized statement covering all services performed
during said month, and City shall pay County therefor promptly
after receipt of such statement.
10. This agreement shall take effect as of July 1,
1990, and shall run for a period ending June 30, 1995. At the
request of the City Council of City, with the consent of the
Board of Supervisors of County, this agreement may be extended
for an additional period of five years.
In the event City desires to renew this agreement for
said five-year period, the City Council shall not later than
December 31, 1994, notify the Board of Supervisors of County, in
writing, that it wishes to renew the same, whereupon the Board of
Supervisors, not later than April 1, 1995, shall notify the City
Council, in writing, that the Board of Supervisors accepts or
rejects such renewal.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may
terminate this agreement as of the first day of July of any year
upon notice in writing to the other party of not less than two
calendar months prior to the date of such termination.
11. This agreement is designed to cover miscellaneous
and sundry services which may be supplied by the County of
Riverside and the various departments thereof. In event there
now exists or there is hereafter adopted a specific contract
between the City and the County with respect to specific
services, such contrast with respect to specific services shall
be controlling as to the duties and obligations of the parties
I!1
///
III
II!
-3-
-- 1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
.... 14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
t'ILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE 300
3535 · 10TH $TRFFT
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, unless such
special contract adopts the provisions hereof by reference.
Dated
ATTEST:
Donald D. Sullivan, Clerk
By
Deputy
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
By
City Clerk
JSR:st
2381it
062090
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
City of
By
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
By
Mayor
-4-
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT.
AB#: 9 TITLE: DEPTHO
HTG: ~.s-?a CITY ATTY
DEPT: ¢. ~. S~EET ~Z~J~E~eE CITY HGR
RECOl~END~,TlON
That Council approve agreement with Riverside County Road
Department for street maintenance services.
BACKGROUND
City has budgeted funds for maintaining City streets. This
agreement provides that County Road Department will do the work as
requested by the City.
County will bill City monthly for the hourly cost of labor,
equipment and materials. Road Department is sending a schedule of
rates and charges which will be billed by the county. The City has
the option to call for bids for.any of the maintenance activities
and utilize other contractors 9f desired. The agreement may be
terminated on 90 days notice.
FISCAL IMPACT
City budget provides $240,000 for routine maintenance, $141,000 for
special maintenance (chip seal), and $1 million for major
maintenance and overlay projects on selected streets.
~ ~---~
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
ROAD CX~qMZ~iON~ & COU),~ ~URVEYOR
June 18, 1990
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE C[NTr~
HAILING ADDR,ICS~:
P.O. BOX 1090
IUVICRSED£, CALgORIqlA 92502
(714) 787-6554
Frank Aleshire
City Manager
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
RE: AGREElENT TO PROVIDE STREET MAINTENANCE SERVICES IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
Dear Mr. Aleshire:
Enclosed is an Agreement between the City and the County for street
maintenance services in the City of Temecula.
Please have the City Council approve the agreement and have the Mayor
execute it on behalf of the City. Please return all four copies of the
Agreement to this office for submittal to the Board of Supervisors.
After Board approval, we will return a fully executed copy to you.
Very truly yours,
Acting Road Conmnissioner and County Surveyor
IFT:hn
Enclosures
cc: Cooper
McKenzie/Russell
COLTNTY ADI~INISTRATWE CENIZR · 4080 LEMON STREET · RWICRSIDIr, CALIFORNIA 92501
AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE STREET MAINTEN~/~CE
SE~%_'ICES IN THE _C~ITY OF TEMECULA
THIS AGREE.W~%T between the COUNT~.. OF RIVERSIDE, herein
called "COUNTY" and the CITY OF ~CULA, her~.in called "CITY".
WITNESSETH.'
That for and in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants herein contained, and of Article I, Chapter 1, Part 1,
Division 1, Title 5 of the Government Code "commencing with
S~cticn 50001), COUNTY agrees., through its Transpor~-ation
D_=partm~.nt, to perform. all functions of City relating to or
pe~?formsd for COUNTY by said Departmez~t, as h.=reinafter provided
for, excep% as to any service which is now or m~y hereaf. Ter be
made the subject of a separate contract witk City and. ior whick
other provisions are in such contract ~de, or w.hich is perfor~.v~.d
pursuant to other provisions of la%: not involving a contract.
The follo;;ing 'te~ and conditions shall gove£n tke
performance of all municipa] functions performed hereunde'r..
1. By reason of the limitations upon the expendJ.t~:re of
CO.~f~Y fund-'-'. provided fc.r in S~ction 6 of ~..rticle X~I o'f Lhe
Constitution of California, City shall pay to County the 6r~tire
cost to County of performing each function, inc]'uding salaries
and wages of all employees engsged the_rein, all supervi~'ion over
such employees while so employed, a prorate of all departmental
overhead, clerical work, office supplies, depreciation on
machinery and e~rui~ment, traa:eling expenses, including mileage
employees and all other cost and expense incidental to '~he
perfoxmance of each of such functions, as detexunined by
The cost of any function may be recomputed annually and the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
15
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
charge revised accordingly thereafter.
In computing the cost of the use of machinery and equipment,
the f=ll cost to COUNTY of rented machinery and equipment and any
operator furnished therewith, and a reasonable rental rate on
County-owned machinery and equipment shall be included.
COUNTY has estimated the City's costs for routine
maintenance services under this Agreement at $240,000.00 for the
period from July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991. CITY shall
include within its budget a sufficient appropriation of funds for
such services.
following:
a.
b.
f.
g.
h.
J.
ke
Routine maintenance services would include the
Pothole patching~
Skin patches and maintenance overlays (not capital
projects or seal coats);
Shoulder grading~
Clean culverts and drainage structures in road
right-of-way~
Weed spraying~
Minor tree trimming for traffic safety~
Replacement of traffic signs~
Painting traffic stripes~
Painting traffic legends;
Litter clean up (trash illegally dumped on road
right-of-way);
Storm damage signing and barricading~
Storm damage repair~
Storm debris removal;
Guardrail repair~
- 2 -
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
o. Minor construction (install small culvert)
p. Minor sidewalk or curb repair;
q. Emergency call out;
r. Supervision of crews;
s. Provide equipment and material to perform above
work.
2. No County officer or employee shall perform for City
any function not coming within the scope of the duties of such
officer or employee in performing services for COUNTY.
3. No service shall be performed hereunder unless City
shall have available funds previously appropriated to cover the
cost thereof.
4. a. No function or service shall be performed
hereunder by any County officer or employee unless
such function or service shall have been included
among the services described in this Agreement.
b. Each such service or function shall be performed
at the times and under circumstances which do not
interfere with the performance of regular County
operations.
5. All persons employed in the performance of such
services and functions for City shall be County employees, and no
City employees as such shall be taken overbyCounty, and no
person employed hereunder shall have any City pension, civil
service, or other status or rights.
For the purpose of performing such services and functions,
and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance
thereof, every County officer and employee engaged in performing
- 3 -
! any such services or function shall be deemed to be an officer or
2 employee of City while performing service for City within the scope
3 of this agreement.
4 6. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for
5 the direct payment of any salary, wages, or other compensation to any
6 County personnel performing services hereunder for City, or any liability
? other than that provided for in this agreement.
8 Except as herein otherwise specified, City shall not be liable
9 for compensation or indemnity to any County employee for injury or
10 sickness arising out of his employment.
1! 7. CITY and COUNTY covenant and agree that, except as otherwise
12 expressly set forth herein, COUNTY makes no representation or warranty
13 of whatsoever kind, nature or sort, either express or implied, concerning
14 the goods and services to be furnished hereunder, AND COUNTY DOES HEREBY
15 OISCLAIM ANY AND ALL SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING SPECIFICALLY ANY IMPLIED
16 WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
17 CONCERNING ANY SUCH GOODS OR SERVICES.
18 8. The city shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless
19 the COUNTY, its officers, agents, servants, and employees of and from
20 any and all liabilities, claims, demands, debt, damages, suits, actions
2! and causes of action of whatsoever kind, nature or sort, including,
22 but not by way of limitation, wrongful death, personal injury or damage
23 to property, the expenses of the defense of said parties and the payment
24 of attorneys fees in any such claim or action, arising out of or in
25 any manner connected with the performance of services and the furnishing
26 of goods or materials by COUNTY hereunder.
27 / / /
~)4) / / /
-4-
1
$
7
9
10
11
15
16
17
19
~0
~5
~7
2~
9. Each County officer or employee performing any service for
City provided for herein shall keep reasonably itemized and in detail
work or job records covering the cost of all services performed,
including salary, wages and other compensation for labor, supervision
and planning, plus overhead, the reasonable rental value of all
County-o~ned machinery and equipment, rental paid for all rented
machinery or equipment, together with the cost of an operator thereof
when furnished with said machinery or equipment, the cost of all
machinery and supplies furnished by County, reasonable handling charges,
and all additional items of expense incidental to the performance of
such function of service.
lO. All work done hereunder is subject to the limitations of
the provisions of Section 23008 of the Government Code, and in accordance
therewith, before any work is done or services rendered pursuant hereto,
an amount equal to the cost and an amount 10% in excess of the estimated
cost must be reserved by City from its funds to insure payment for
work, services and materials provided hereunder.
Each county officer or department performing any service hereunder
shall render to City on a biweekly basis an itemized statement covering
all services performed during said two week period, and City shall
pay County therefore within thirty {30) days after receipt of such
statement.
11. This agreement shall take effect as of July 1, 1990, and
shall run for a period ending June 30, 1991. At the request of the
City Council of City, with the consent of the Board of Supervisors
of County this agreement may be extended for an additional period of
one (1) full year; provided that City shall give County notice in writing
///
1
$
$
?
9
10
11
12
15
16
17
19
~0
~5
~7
of its request to extend this agreement for an additional period of
one (1) full year before April l, 1991.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may terminate this
agreement upon notice in writing to the other party of not less than
ninety days prior to the date of such termination.
///
-6-
0§/24/90
1
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
15
16
17
19
~0
91
~6
27
12. ~OTICES
Any notices sent or required to be sent to either party
shall be mailed to the following addresses:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
P.O. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
Dated:
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BILL ~ZENSTEIN
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
By
(SEAL)
CITY OF TEMECULA
Attest:
Mayor
Cit2 Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
HTG:
DEPT: C .r~
TITLE:
HAH HICKS PARK
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
RECOMMENDATION
Direct City Attorney to prepare a lease for Old Town Temecula
Foundation in Sam Hicks Park.
BACKGROUND
The City has been offered title to Sam Hicks Park.
TCSD has budgeted funds to maintain the park. County has budgeted
funds to make improvements to the park.
The Old Town Temecula Museum Foundation has a lease on a portion of
the park. They intend to raise funds to build and operate a
museum.
City Council needs to review and approve the plans for this project
and approve a lease agreement.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: /o TITLE: DEPT HD
HTG: ~-$-9,~ &CCE?TANCE OF D~e~eDB CITY ATTY
DEPT: zc.m. FO~ BAil HZCKB PARK CITY HGR
Reco~endetion
That the Council accept grant deeds from the Sam Hicks Monument
Park Foundation for the Sam Hicks Monument parksite.
Discussion
The Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation and the City of Temecula
desire to maintain the Sam Hicks Monument Park theme and assure
Continuity in construction and maintenance of the parksite.
Annexation of these parcels was originally proposed to County
Service Area #143 prior to incorporation of the City.
Staff Concerns
Staff recommends that an agreement be drawn up at a later date
which incorporates the elements of the lease agreement between the
Park Foundation and the Old Town Temecula Museum and considers the
conditions reflected in the letter to Supervisor WaltAbraham dated
January 31, 1989.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING GRANT
DEEDS FOR PARK PURI~SES FOR THE SAM HICKS
MONUMENT PARKSITE.
WHEREAS, The Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation has offered grant deeds for
two parcels comprising the Sam Hicks Monument Parksite as set forth on the exhibits attached
hereto:
W!:!'ERF~AS, The Foundation desires the City Council to accept said offer of grant
deeds;
NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve as
follows:
SECTION 1. That the grant deeds as offered by the Grantor are hereby approved by
said City.
SECTION 2. That the grant deed is accepted conditioned by the requirement that an
agreement be formed and executed between the Foundation and City Council setting forth terms
of acceptance of this grant deed.
SECTION 3. That the said agreement shall be executed and approved by the City
Council prior to recording of the subject deed and this resolution.
SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign this resolution and the City Clerk shall attest and
certify to the passage and adoption thereof but shall not record until conditions set forth in
Section 3 (above) arre met.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEALI
Scott Field, City Attorney
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK FOUNDATION
P.O. Box 539 · Ternecula, CA 92390
(714) 676-3060
.-;.. · ?.-;.. '...'7~- -
January 31, 1989
Supervisor Walt Abraham
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Dear Supervisor Abraham:
At the regular meeting of our Board of Directors on November 8,
1988, it was voted to annex the property known as Sam
Hicks Monument Park (see exhibit A) to the CSA District
143 with the following stipulations:
1,
The name of the park and any land annexed to it
shall remain SAM HICKS MONUMEN~ PARK.
The location of the "THEY PASSED THIS WAY" monument
is to remain the same unless the change of location
is approved by the Hicks family, namely Nancy
Hicks Maurice and Linda Hicks Radich, or heirs
thereof.
3. The lease we have with the OLD TOWN TEMECULA MUSEUM
will be honored. (Attached Exhibit B)
The TEMECULA LIONS CLUB TOT LOT is to be continued
but can be relocated· The Tot Lot is to be an
Old West Theme· It is also n6ted the the SAM
HICKS MONUMENT PARK FOUNDATION has a $750.00 donation
from GTE and the TENECULA LIOBS CLUB has an additional
$750.00 in donations that has been earmarked for
more playground equipment.
The C.S.A. DISTRICT is to continue to maintain
landscaping and trash pick-up. Additional landscaping
should be implemented - peripheral flower 9ardens
and herb gardens should be added in such a way
as to not diminish the usable footage of the park.
The existing MEMORIAL TREES can be moved and.others
not yet planted are to be added. The C.S.A. 143
DISTRICT is to place plaques on granite cemented
into the ground· (see attached Exhibit C for a
list of MEMORIAL TREES donated)
Curbs, gutters and sidewalks are to be placed
around the Park on Moreno Road and Mercedes Ave.
Lighting of the Park is to be done using the old
time fixtures as used in OLD TOWN TEMECULA.
-MORE-
Hicks Monument Park - page 2
At all times the overall landscaping and buildings
are to reflect the 1890 theme of the TEMECULA
HISTORICAL OVERLAY.
All of these stipulations are to be carried forth
to any proposed park expansion. (SEE Exhibit D)
10. The C.S.A. 143 DISTRICT is to incorporate recommendations
of the TEMECULA COMMUNITY PLAN TASK FORCE in the
planning for the park·
11. In the event C.S.A. 143 DISTRICT and/or any future
City of County government for whatever reason,
decides that they no longer want to maintain SAM
HICKS MONUMENT PARK in its entirety as a park,
the land will revert back to the SAM HICKS MONUMENT
PARK FOUNDATION.
Evely~Harker
President
Encl. 5
LA~ LEASE
~lCl~ MOND!~ENT PA~K ~OUNDATION, a California ncn-p~ofit ~blic
benefi~ corporation, be~e~a~ta= calle~ 'Lessor" and O~ TO~
· .fornia ncn-p=.~fit ~blic benefit
co,potation, heteinaft~r called "Lessee",
NOW, THEREFOR~,
hereinafter mentioned,
in'consider,ties of covenants and promises
the partlea, 5esscr and Lessee, agree as
1. DESC~IPTiO.'~ OF ?tE:~.iSE$. Less.or here~7 I$~$e~ so Leases,
and Lessee here~y hi,es an~ ~kes from b~.~sor, ~he pre~i~es ~o be
,,ned as that le~d to be occupied ty ~% mu~eu~ as per -].. a~tach d
pi~= plan ~xhibi~ ".~" ~==ached hereto) located on Moreno Road,
Teaecu!a, California, here!na~ter ca,led ~e "premises".
2. TE~. The te:'m of ~his Lease shall b~ fo~ a period of
fozt2 (40) years, c~mencing on August i, 1988, ~4 ending on
April 30, 2028~ unless sooner ~ermlnated pursuant to any
provision hereof. The term may be ext,nded as set forth in
paragraph four (4} of ~his A~reement.
3. RENTAL. Lessee shall pay as re.-.tal for the demised
p:smises the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($i.00) for each year 'there,fro.-,
for the ~erm hereof, payable In advance on the first (let) day of
August of each year commencing with the date hereof.
If Lessee renew~ the term of this Lease a~ provided
paragraph four (A), the Lea~e shall continue fo~ the same rental
r ate.
Rent shall be payable in l~wful money cf the United States
to Leimor at the add~e8~ stated herein or to such other persons
OC at such other places as Lessor may d~ignate in writing.
4. OPTION TO RENEW, As part of the consideration for the
option to extend and renew this Lease for another forty-?--at
term, u~on the same ~e:ms an~ col~dftions hereof. The option to
renew and ex~end said L~aae must be exercised, if at all, by
p~lO~ tO the expiration of the iaitlal t~rm.
· 5, USE OF THE ~P.Z}~ISZ$. The ~re.-..,isss shall be us~.d
excluaive'l'~-fo~ the const:uction and o~ation of a museum and ~
annex building of 10,000 ~quare feet, including public rest rooms.
Sai~ const~uction shall be of a design 'approved by Lessor
~ee agrees to comply with all applicable laws, rule~,
requlations, and o~dlnancas of every governmental body or agency
whcse autho~ity %xtend~ to the leased pzoperty, of to the
business conducted upon the lease~ premi~e~.
1
6~ ~LTERATIONS AND REPAIRS. Lessee ~ay nc~ make any
al=e:ations (other .than insu~.etantial o~es~ ~o th~ leased
p~emiae~ w~hou~ p~!o~ written consent of 5eseor. Lessee accepts
p~emises as be!n~ in ~ood ~epai~ ~d ~ond~!on~ and Lessee
the p~emises ~n good repai~ ~d con~l~!cn.
~essee, furnl;h labor o~ Mto.~AAi to or for %he benefit of ~he
furnish labor or materials to or for ~he benefit of th~ leased
proper ty.
8. .OESTR~jCTION OF PRZMISES, Should any buildings or
improvements on the leased poemisis be damage~ of destroyed by
fire,
so
~Afty ~ ~cen~ (50%) of the
replacemen~ cos~ of all buiw~'--- and improvements %o be located
on ~he l~ased p~emi~e~, Lessee
and ~aa~o~a
required to be made by Lessor excepted.
i0. L'~ILITZES. Lessee ag:..=.~ to pay, b, fore delinquency,
all charges far water, ga~, electricity, and any and all othe~
service~ · -'
which ~y be used ~n or u;.o:~ the leased
n. TAXES. Lessee shall pay not late.- than fiftee~ (15]
days bigots they become d~iinquent all taxes and asses~mants of
every nature levied or assessed du~Ing Lessee'~ tenancy on the
leased premises or on any flztures, located on ~he leased
p~em~sma, e~cep~ as set forth herein. Lessee shall furnish
Lessor with proof of such payment not later than five (5) days
before any such tax o= a~sas~ment becomes delinquent. Lessor
leased premises.
3~7~ Of ~he ~ ~ vi mad Lessee
shall not use ot S~mlt the u~a of s~i~ p~emis~ fo~ any unlawful
5ea~ or aublea~e all o~ a 2oftton of t}',o p~emlse~ withou~
liability undm~ the terms of this Lea me.
f~om any ac~, oralssion or negligence of Lessee, or its
and agains~ all costs, ex;enses and liab!ii~ies incuc:ed in o: in
connection w!~h any auch el~im o~ p~oeeed!ng brought thereon,
tnciu~in~ bu~ go~ !~Ited to, cou~t costs and reasonable
Lessee shall ~'aintain in ~ull fo~c. du~in,; the te~m of this
~ar~ons occu~r~n-~ I~ o~ a~ou~: the i~em~aea. The amount of such
fequl re mor~ ~han TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND ~LLARS
nor more than ~IFTY TI~O~3S~D DOLlaRS ~$50.000.~O) for pro~e:ty
damage. feemee agra,-, to name Lesao~ as an addi~.onal insured
and shall furnish a cer~if!ca~e of insurance.
damage to ~ · premises, ~n th~ amount cf the full replacement
value thereof, a~ the ~ame may exist f{cm time to time, which
~ep!a~ememt value Is app~oximatlly ~100,000.00~ but in no event
leas than the total amount required by lende~ havin~ liens on
the poemiaea, agains~ all pe~1Is Included within
~lassi~lca%ion of fica, ext.nde4 cove~a~, ,~andali~m, malicious
el,chief, flood, theft, and apse!31 e.<tanded perils {'all
as such term lm ~JS~d i~: t:.e insurance Industry] Said insurance
~hall ~covide fo: pay~.~:.t of lo~a thefeud, der to ~eseoc or ~o the
holde:m o~ mort~aq~e o: deed~ of t:,~sc on th~ premises.,
shall, in addition, obtain and keep in ~orae durir~g the term of
this Lease a pc!icy c~ ~ntal valu,~ !n~urance ccvering a period
of one yesr, ',ith loa~ payable to Les~o:, which insurance shall
also :~ve~ all ~ea:. ,s~a~e tsx~s and insurance co~ts for said
pe:iod. Xf the Lesse~ .,hall fall to procu~ and m~intain said
3
and ~lnt:ln ~h~ ~ but ~t ~he ex~enee o~ ~e~ee~. i~ auch
fo: s~ch deductible amount.
a~ sam ~ea~cnable fine for ~h~ purpose o~ laapect~n~ the leased
p~ope~ty. "~.easonabla time' ~hel! ~e define~ aa dur~n~ normal
ope~a~ing
16. ~Al~K.%UPTC¥ '' the teases aha~i t~-aome inselves~ or
~ake an aasl~n~en~ fez ~he bena~i~ of c~edito~, o~ ~ile a
..~ of any b~kruptcy.
composition o~ insolvtncy lay oc ac~ o~ If the Leases shall be
ad~udqed baak~upt, o~ If a recelv~[ o: t=us=ee ~f the property of
~he Leases s~all be appointed, or ~his Lease shall by o~at~cn
o~ law devolve upon or pass ~o any person o~ persona other than
the Lessee, ~hen An each ,uch case :he Lessor a~a!! have khe
righ~ ~d opti~n to terminate ~his Lease at any time, ~nd with or
wlt~,cu~ demand cz no~ice and with o: without legal p~ocess enter
in~o t~e d~mlae~ p~emises and tak~ ~snesaion thereof and may use
all fo~ce neceasacM ~o effect s~ch entr2 oc to hold such
~oa~ea~ion o~ to cemove the Lessee o~ any person o~ any p~cpe~ty
f~cm ~he demised p~emleea.
17. WAIVER OF B~.ZACH. The waiver by
o~ any p~cviaion of ~hls Lease shall no~ constitute a eontlnuin~
waiver or a waiver of any eubae~uen~ br~ach of the same or a
hereto.
ON SUCCESSORS. The Drcvisions of ~his Lease
upoa and mheil Inu=e to the benefit of the
seal.Ins end legal :ep~sen=atives of the
4
P.O. Box $3g
Temecula, CA 92390
the Leases at,
P.o. aox 792
Ternsouls, CA 92390
payments are
that Lease,
and poe:age
party may change auch addzess
:egis~eted mail to ~he other patty.
20. DEFA:~LTI ~O?ZC?., O? OEf'AULT; ~R~ACH, A default in the
~etfct~anee of any pcomlea of, o: o~ any ebb fashion imposed upon
Lease unleal ~he pat~? in de~aul~ fa~l~ ~o cute ~uch
within ~h~tty (30) days a~er tha wct~ten noSice o~ default has
bear ae:ve~, excep~ that faiiuce Ce cute a ~e!ault in the
o~ tens shall constitute a breach o~ this Lease !~ such de:aul~
ia not cuted within ~ive (S~ days a~tet ~tt~ten notice o~ ~efaul':
has been served. Zf either patty beeaches this Lease, the other
pat~y shall be enti~:ad to pursue every legal and ~uitable
eetm~na~e this ~eane and :he :~h: to recover acctue~ ~en~, paid
in advance. ~ssor, in addition ~o other r~me~iea i~ may have,
shall have 2he lmmadta2e ~igh~ ko :eenLry, and ~y remove all
geesone and property ~rom ~h, ~:ami.ea~ ~uch proFerry may be
m~ote~ at ~he coe~ of Lessee. The p:evailin~ pac~y abel! be
rmA~u~ae~ attorney's fees.
day and year ~irat a~ve written.
SAM gICKS MONb~NT
?RP, X FOUNDATION,
Cal!fofnia non-~rofit
benefit ¢or~oratlon
President
OLD TO;w~ T~F. COLA MUSEUM
a California non-profit
public b~n~fik~ocporaticn
HELGA"BERGBR ~..'
President
KXHIBI~ "A"
OeactLptton:
In the unlnco:porated a:e of the State of ¢aiifo£nia, County of
Riverside, described as follows=
The portion of Lot 6, and o[ the unnamed road in Block 2 as shown
by Map of Subdivision cf the Pauba Land and Water Company, In the
County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by Map on fLle
in Book 11 Page $07 of Maps, Records Of San Diego County,
Califoria, described as follows1
Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 32, Block l, of the
Town of Tamecula as shown by Map on file }n Book 15 Page 726 of
Maps, Records of San Olego County, California; thence south 44
digcasa 25' 05" west, along ~he northwesterly boundary of said
town o~ ?emacvia, a distance o6 141.45 feet to a poin~ on the
northerly ~lgh~ of way ~tne of an unnamed road (60 ~eet wide) as
described in dedication and easement deed to the County of River-
side by dled recorded April 22, 1969 as ~n&tcument No. 39504 of
Offioisl Rageida of Riverside County, California;
?hence south 88 degrees 07' 25" west~ along said northerly line~
?hence westerly continuing a~ong said northerly line being the
a;o oi a tangent curve concave northerly and having a radius of
375.~$ feet through a cent;a1 angle o~ ~ deg;ees Ol'l?", a dis-
tance of 124,?$ ~eet;
Thence notth 17 deg£se; 08'42" east, along the easterly line o~
said unnamed road a di;t~cca of 290.~? ~aet;
?hence south 4~ degrees 02'36" eas~, a di&tance of 2;1.16 ~eeC to
the point of beginning.
ppi~G ~ MOTS,. 6
~~ SAM HICKS
·
POST PARK
FIRE STATION
OFFICE
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
i ,,. % \
To:
PRELIMINARY REPORT
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
3880 LEMON STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 686-4180 (800) 442-4970
May 30, 1990
City of Temecula
Attn: Frank Aleshire
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Your Reference: Park Site
Our No. : C519611
In response to the above referenced application for a Policy of Title Insurance,
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA hereby reports that it is prepared to
issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title
Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set
forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or
encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception below or not excluded from
coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy
forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or
Policies are set forth on the attached cover. Copies of the Policy forms should be
read. They are available from the office which issued this report.
This Report (and any supplements or amendments thereto) is issued solely for the
purpose of facilitating the issuance of a Policy of Title Insurance and no liability
is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance
of a Policy of Title Insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
.
Dated as of May 21, lggO, at 7:30 a.m. .___~'
Iob'Arnette/lc, Title Officer
The form of Policy of Title Insurance contemplated by this Report is:
{ ) ALTA Residential Policy (6-1-87)
( ) ALTA Loan Policy {10-21-87) with ALTA Endorsement Form i Coverage
(X) CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1988
( ) ALTA Owner's Policy (10-21-87)
()
The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by
this report is a fee.
- 1-
C519611
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation, a non-profit corporation
At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and
Exclusions contained in said Policy form would be as follows:
1. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of
Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State
of California.
1A. General and special taxes for the fiscal year 1990-1991, a lien not yet payable.
IB. General and special taxes for the fiscal year lgSg-lggO,
First Installment : $1,707.73, now delinquent to which a penalty
must be added
Penalty : $170.77
Second Installment : $1,707.73, now delinquent to which a penalty
and advertising cost must be added
Penalty
Advertising Cost
Tax Code
Tax Parcel No.
Exemption
Affecting
: $170.77
: $10.00
: 094-088
: 921-070-016-4
: None
: Said land
1C. Defaulted general and special taxes and subsequent delinquencies for the
Fiscal Year : 1989-1990
Taxing Authority: County of Riverside
Parcel Number : 921-070-016-4
Amount to Pay : $2,068.62
Prior to : June 30, lggO
Affecting : Said land
1D. Supplemental taxes for the fiscal year 1988-198g, assessed pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 3.5 (co~mnencing with section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation
Code of the State of California:
Tax Code
Tax Parcel No.
Assessment No.
First Installment
Second Installment
Penalty
Advertising Cost
094-022
921-070-016-4
050470867-5
$1,596.59, Paid
$1,596.$g, now delinquent to which a penalty
and advertising cost must be added
$15g.65
$10.00
2. An easement in favor of the public over any portion of the herein described
property included within public roads.
C519611
3. Covenants, conditions and restrictions in an instrument
Recorded : April 25, 1973 as Instrument No. 52863
Restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, religion or national origin are deleted.
4. The terms, covenants, conditions, and restrictions, contained in an instrument
entitled "Agency Agreement", executed by and between Kacor Realty, Inc., a California
corporation, and Rancho California Water District, a public corporation, dated March
29, 1979, and recorded May 7, 1979 as Instrument No. 92330.
- 3-
C519611
DESCRIPTION
The land referred to in this report is situated in the County of Riverside, State of
California, and is described as follows:
That portion of Lot 6, and of the unamed road now known as Moreno Road in Block 2, as
shown by Map of Subdivision of the Pauba Land and Water Company, in the County of
Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 11, Page 507 of Maps, in
the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, described as
follows:
Beginning at the most Westerly corner of Lot 32, Block 1, of the Town of Temecula as
shown by Map on file in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego County,
California;
thence South 44°25'05" West, along the Northwesterly boundary of said Town of
Temecula, a distance of 141.45 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way line of
an unnamed road now known as Mercedes Street (60.00 feet wide) as described in
Dedication and Easement Deed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded April 22,
1969 as Instrument No. 39504 of Official Records of Riverside .County, California;
thence South 88o07'25" West, along said Northerly line, a distance of 55.58 feet;
thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly line being the arc of a.tangent curve
concave Northerly and having a radius of 375.78 feet through a central angle of
19°01'17", a distance of 124.75 feet;
thence North 17o08'42" East, along the Easterly line of said unnamed road a distance
of 290.87 feet;
thence South 45%2'38" East, a distance of 271.16 feet to the point of beginning.
NOTE THE FOLLOWING
Note 1: Pursuant to Sections 480.3 and 480.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the
County Recorder's office will levy an additional $20.00 recording fee upon all
documents that are not in compliance with said code. To avoid being assessed the
additional fee, please have the buyer or transferee complete the preliminary change of
ownership report and attach to the appropriate document.
- 4-
C519611
Note 2: It appears that the company may be requested to insure or otherwise pass on
the validity of certain documents executed by a corporate entity.
If this is correct such documents should be executed by either the chairman of the
board of directors, the president, or any vice president and by either the secretary,
any assistant secretary, chief financial officer or the assistant treasurer.
If such documents are not so executed, we will require an approved resolution of the
board of directors of such corporation authorizing such execution.
Note 3: The charges for this title report are for services to date only. Any
additional work requested in regards to this report will incur additional. charges as
appropriated.
Note 4: California "Good Fund" Law
All title insurance co~anies, controlled escrow companies and underwritten title
companies will be affected by a new law which becomes effective on January 1, 1990.
Assembly Bill 512 (Chapter 598, Statutes of lg89), which added Section 12413.1 to the'
Insurance Code of the State of California is effective January 1, 1990. Except for
funds deposited by cash or by electronic payment, this law prohibits a
title insurance company from disbursing funds from an'escrow account, until the day
these funds are made available to the depositor pursuant to Part 229 of Title 12 of.
the Code of Federal Regulations, (Reg. CC). Under Reg. CC, items such as CASHIER'S
CERTIFIED or TELLER'S CHECKS may be available for disbursement on the business day
following the business day of deposit; however, other forms of deposits may cause
extended delays in the closing of the escrow. Ticor Title Insurance will not be
responsible for accruals of interest resulting from compliance with the disbursement
restrictions mandated by this law.
If you choose to wire transfer funds to our company in order to avoid any delays in
closing, please use the following format;
*Wire Instructions:
Citibank, Delaware
One Penn's Way
New Castle, Delaware
ABA t03110020g
Credit: Ticor Title Ins. of CA. - Riverside
Account t38150936
Reference - Escrow/Title Officer's name Bob Arnette
Order Number C519611
IMPORTANT
It is imperative that the wire text be exactly as
indicated above. Any extraneous or missing
information may cause unnecessary delays in
confirming the receipt of funds.
-
1'O3131 C~-PII 3 I10-81)
PRELIMINARY REPORT COVER'
Printed Policy Exceptions and Exclusions
ALTA RESIDENTIAL POLICY (6-1-87)
The Exclusions and the Exceptions of the ALTA Residential Policy
form recite thlt you are not insured against Iaaa. costs. attorneys'
1~, ~ eml)~ resulting from:
I Gove..no,.! ,d~. ;o.or. ~,d the e~ae~e or ~o~, of any
~ or ~.~f,.~nt ~lgulation. This includes building and zoning
· lend use
· improvem~ms o~ the land
· lind 'd~ision
This exclusion dolls not ~ to violations or the enforcemere of
these matter~ which appear in the public records at Policy Date.
This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items
12 and 13 of Covered 1'We Risks.
2 The right to take the land by condemning it. unless:
· a notice of exercising the right aepesrs in the public records on
the POl~y ~
· the taking i~ prior to the Policy Date and is binding on
you if you _~__,,,.~t the land without knowing of the taking
3 Title Risks:
· that are =reetad. allowed. or agreed to by you
· that are known to you. but not to us. on the POlicy Date -- unless
the~ ~a*~,e~__-red in the public records
· that resuh in no loss to you
· that first affect your title after the Policy Date -- this does not
limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 6 of Covered Title
Risks
4 Failure to pay value for your title.
S L~ck of a right:
· to any land outside the area specifically described and referred
to in Item 3 of Schedule A
· in streets. alleys. or waterways that touch your land
This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in hem 5 of Covered
Title Risks.
~'-~l~d Exct131To n~
(a) Any rights, interests or claims of parties in possession of the
land not shO~Nn by the public records.
lb) Any easements or liens not shown by the public records.
This ck)es not limit the lien coverage in hem 8 of the Covered
Title Risks.
(c) Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose
and which are not shown by the public records.
This does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 1 2 of
Covered Title Risks.
(d) Any water rights, claims or title to water on or under the land.
ALTA LOAN POLICY (10-21.87)
wrrH ALTA ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE
The Exclusions from Coverage of the ALTA Loan Policy form recites that the following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage. costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of:
I (e) Any law. ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting.
regulating. prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use. or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement
now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of
which Ihe land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection. or the effect of any violation of these laws. ordinances or governmental
regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a
violation ar alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.
re) Any governmental ix)lice Ix)war not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,
lien or orlcumlxanoa resulting from a violation or ellaged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of
Policy.
2 Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but not excluding
from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
know~.
3 Defects. liens. encumbrances. edvefee claims or other matters:
(a) =reeted. sofiared. assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
re) not kno~m to the Cem11~ny. not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in
writing to the Company by the irmured cla',T~nt prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy;
{c) rseulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
kl) attaching or created sobsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage
over any matutah/lien for sen,~:es. ~ or ramariel. or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements
(a) resulting in loss ar damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.
4 Unonforselbility of the lien of the insured m=rtgege because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy. or the inability or
failure of am/subaequent owner of the indebtedness. to comply with epldicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated.
S Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage. or claim thereof. which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured
mortgage and is based UlX)n ueury or any consumer =redit protection or truth in landing law.
0 Any statutoq, lien tot services. labor ar materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services. labor or materials over the lien
of the insured mort0age) arising from an improvement at work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to
Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of
Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to ~dvance.
(Exceptions and Exclusions Continued on Reverse Side)
CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE POUCY--I~8
The Exclusim~ tram Cew,lge of Ihe CLTA StondaKI Cowwage Policy fixm rec~es that the following matters ~re expresMy excluded from the
cm'er~e of thi ~m~icf ~M the C(m~p~ wM n~ ~Y Mes or Mm~ge~ c~m~' Mton~Ys~ fees or es~enses wh~ ~ ~ ~ M:
1. (~) Any Imp. ,~limmm or B~ ,...~:v-' r~ulm~on (including but
n~ limited to buikling M zoning law~. ordinances. or
IS) the oatepancv. ~ er eawimtem d the load: (ii) the
dmrlclM, ,' .~_, #u~ m kx:Mio~ M lay i,,~.o.~.,~;.,~t now
f hereMMit Mlclld Mt the laird; (i) l 11; ? 4lion in ownml~ip
m e chlnll M the=' i ,l~M or MII of the ilnd er lny
W of which the lind il or wll I pert; or (M environmtntll
Prolection, M lhl M M MYI W M these laws,
ordinMtgel or e t_ (.,~i~IM tlB~ttant em~lM Io the oxtont
tbat n nmim M the ~.~,u ...rd theruM or. amice of. dafact.
lien or emmmbrMK~ $ from . violMion or Miaged
Molltio~ Mfacting the land W baen W in the puldic
record~MDIteMPoficy.
lb)Any g_.~ ~_.~..~.! W power nm esoluded by (a) above.
· amice of · defect. lien or erictmtMince resulting from a
Molation M Mlaged W I~ the lend his been
reconMd in me pubtic i1gords m Dim M Po#cy.
2. RMh~ of eminent dmnlin unlaes riMice of the exercise thereof
bas been rmm~led in me public recorM m Dine of Policy, bm
not excluding from coverage any toking which Ms occun'ed Prior
to Dine of Policy which would ba binding on the rights of a
3. Dnfest~. liens. encumbrances. ~ claims or other matters:
(i) whethM or not rtceded in thl I)d)lic re~rda at Date of Policy.
but created. suffered. Illumed or Igreed to by the insured
claimant;
(!)) nM know~ to the Coml~ny. nM ~ in the public records
at Date of Policy. but known to the insured claimant and not
di~doled in ~l~Titing to the Company by the insured claimant
prier to the date the insured cllimant _M~__-_me an insured under
(c) re~Jlting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
Id! attaching or CTeated subesquam tO Date of Policy: or
(e) resulting in Io~ or damage which would not have been
lustlined if the insured claimint had paid value for the insured
mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because
of the inability or failure of the in~ured at Date of Policy. or the
inebifity or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness.
to comply with the NNMicabie doing businees laws of the state
in which the land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage.
or claim thereof. which erases out of the transaction evidenced
bythe insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer
?edit prmection or truth in lending law.
Schedule B of !he CLTA Stmtd~d Cov~lge Policy form recites that this policy
nm pay co~s, laerneys' Mes or expense~l w~ich arise by teeson of:
1. Trams or !ftlfi ,..~1~ which Ire nm shown Is existing liens
by the records of ~ny toxing authority that levies taxes or
Proc~idings by a Iwbtic ~ which may result in taxes or
sssess~ms, er nonces of such Presidings, whether or not
2. Any facts. H~hts. imerests or claims which ere not shown by
the pubtic nlsmdl bm which coofd be secef~ined by an inNruction
of the land or which ram/be W by ~ in poesession
3. Esls.,,~,d~. ~ or Wnoes, or claims thereof, which are
does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will
Disore~ancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
er~roechmems, or any M~r f~ ~h I ~ su~y ~uld
· ~, a~ ~h are ~t sh~ ~ t~ ~M~ r~rds.
5. (e) U~tom~ mini~ Mires; (b) ~M~ns ~ exitions in
~ems ~ in ~s I~ t~ i~ul~ ~f; (c) water
r~hts, ~aims ~ t~ to ~m. ~r ~ ~t the ma~ers
~ u~ (~). (b) ~ (c) ere ~ ~ t~ p~ic r~.
6. Any f~s. r~h~. im~ ~ ~i~ ~h am not s~n by
t~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~u~ ~ I~i~ ~ making
i~uiw ~ t~ ~ in t~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~ r~err~
to in ~ A.
7. T~ ~ ~ any failure to ~ ~h t~ torres, ~nants
a~ ~s ~ t~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~err~ to
~~A.
ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (10-21-8T)
The Exclus~ns from Coverage of the ALTA Owner's Policy form recites that the following n'lltters are ex~rees]y excluded from the coverage
of this policy lad the Comperly will nM ply k~s or damage. colts. attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (I) Any law. ordinm~ or B" .trr, h~Mal ragulmion (including but not limited to buiMing and sorting laws. ordinances. or regulations) restricting.
renulatin& Wing or relating to (i) the occuplncy. use. or enjoymere of the land; (iS) the character. dintensions or location of any improvement
now or horeofter erected on the land; (iii) a sepMItion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or Ires of the land or any parcel
of which the land is or wes I ~ or (iv) anviror,,cntM I)rMe~ion. or the effect of any violation of these laws. ordinances or governmental
regulations. exc~X to the extem theta amice of the aMMc;..,,:nt thMeof or I notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting fTom a
viofatimt or altered violltkm effectlag the land has been recorded in the public recon:k It Date of Policy.
lb) A~/Bx[ ,,,J.~'-' ixdice Ixwmr nM excluded by (a) Ibove. esce~ to the extent that a amice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect.
~ or ~ resulting from I violation or Mleged violation eftacting the land has been recMdad in the I)UMic records at Date of
~-y.
2. Rights of eminent di)mMn unless amice of the exercise thereof his been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but not excluding
from coverage any tlAing which has _M~__,_,rred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
in w~'Wng to the Conigeny by the inswed claimant prior to the date the insured clainmnt became an insured under this policy;
{c) resulting in no Iml or Ik,m~e to the imbed cllimlm;
(d) m~(~ing or creMed ~ ia qusM to Dato of PMicIc or
(e) resulting ii~ Io~ or ~ which we~ld nM haw been Wined if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured
6300 Wilshire Boulmmrd. P.O. Box 92792. Los Angeles, ~fornis'90(O9