HomeMy WebLinkAbout062690 CC Agenda .~... ....... BII~I.v~:!9~i', .l!9, _~I~0-
Section 54956. 'to consid~ r~l pr~y a~iti~on*
.- of ~5 ainu~ i~ provided'l~o. ~ of ~e. ~:.~ i
' ' ~' ' desire ~o ~ to ~e Co~cil a~ut an it~ ~ liit~.
'~:- -,:- For all o~ ag~a ~t~s a 'I~ut b i!o .2u .~ It
"" ~ f~l~ ,.~ ~e Ct~F Clerk ~ ~e ~~-~ q!~l. ~, '~t
-
'~-~?~ ,,. ~. ' '~re ~I a f~ve ~5} a~ t~ l~t for
:~. :.[ .':..: i~~/.
conient ~~ ~o~ IepaFace a'~on.
!.1
Approve ainutea of ~une 12, X990 u mil~d.
I~~NDATION:
Adopt a resolution antitied:
~97.~T%~ ~O. 90-
3..1 Receive and file.
o
4.1
Receive and file.
402'
A~opt a resolution entitled:
-IBfOLUTXGtg .]K). 00-
i,atza~x:me..Tim zz~!u, lfZAa zooo-oo '~t~4aff-.,,Zo ],'~:r. ATI
$%,0oo. l,~ 'L'EB Iqml, O~B O~' I'ROVXDXlm &DD%TXOBI,L CGtnfUI~T'Z
~ a resolution
Adopt & resolution entitled:
B. BIOZ,~XQII ~0, ~0'
'6.
7.1
Autaoriss ~e city ~ngineer to solicit prGl~sals
for ~he -provision of soils and IratarSal 'mtinq
Be~rices for FiBoil Y~ar 1990-91.
Adopt a r~olution entitled:
UOOLUTX Jo. to-
a~2~TXOM:
10.1 Author'lie the City Manager to, purr.~ale a Kodak
235AF oopi~ ~~h ~e ~asinq ~-~t of
~e Co~ty of Rivaside.
it!~OW~TXON:
Set the second exteltalon of
Tentative Parcel Hap No. 21383
on July 24, 1990.
11.1
time request for
for Public Hearing
'Vli'.JflltllllO
00/21/00
12.
Continued from the smetinq of ~dne 19, 1990.
an-: application filed by Xi-nd~rcare I~arninq Center,
aivtde 4.4 acru located south of ~_rqarita Road,
Xnc. to
north of
Rancho ~mlifornia Road, east of Lindy #ay and vest of Moraqa
into two parcels.
12.1
'Approve Final Tract Nap No. 24169, subject to the
conditions of approval.
13.
13.1 &yard checks for contest ei~q ~tries.
13,2 D~ staff ~ ~y f~~ a~ion d~ired.
14.
15.
~TlOII:
15.1
adopt a resolution entitled:
RBSOLUTXOM MO. 90-.
a mmOLUTXO~ o~ W~B ex~ ~OUH~ZL Of THB ex~ o~ mmo~u~
18 o¸
18.1
Refer toCityAttorney to prepare maenduents, or
!8.2'
'Refer to City lianager for further study, or
18 · 3
Reject roquest and-direct City Hansget to enforce
current ordinance.
19.
~To~L~ fo~ .~-re~t SveeD4 ng jqe~4
RECOIO[ENDATIOH:
19 · 1
Authorize the City
agreement with R. F.
svoeping services.
!(ariaget to enter into an
Dickson Coupany for street
20.
R~ATION:
20.1
Authorize the City Hansget to enter ~nto an
agreeBent with the Tenecula Tovn Centerton&kethe
foXloving ~uprovesenta 'on Pancho California Road.
Install traffic signal at thenainentrance to
the shopping center.
Close the existing nedJan cut at the rotefly
driveway to the shopping center.
ReJJdmrse developer for '~provenents out of
future sales tax revenues.
Request Rancho Mater D~trict to install pilot
plann/ng prograB in the Rediarm east of ¥nez
Ro~d.
2X.X ~evt~ and approve ~ta£f
.D,Ixe,m~ the City lianaget to execute a cent.~a...,,~ with
Llqh~£oo~ Plannin~ Group ~ conduc~ a .c~ive
land u~e inventory.
23.1
~uthortze the ~ayor to .iqn "a~ree~ £or Buildinq
P!an~ gxa~intnq Servicean vAth #ildan ~ociate~.
¸24.
A~.;r~priate $200,000 frei con~A-ngon~y and direct
to · expedite . ~&£fic I~£1~y ttlldilI arid
N-.~lt· It~I ~1~ 3, 1990, 7:00 ~, .Rincho California Water
District C~Immity Rooi, 28061 D*iaz Road, TeIoC'u!&, -~aIi£ornia
MX~ES O~ A ~EGOXu~ltMI~TXMG
~3,D ~ 12; 1990
An Executive Session of the Temecula City Council was called to
order at 6=35 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
ABSENT: 0
COUNClLM],:MB~RS: None
Also present were City Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott
F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek.
The Executive Session was adjourned at 6:50 P.M.
The Executive Session was adjourned at 6:50 PM.
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order
at 7:05 PM.
INVOCaTiON
The invocation was waived.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember
Birdsall.
PRBSENTATXONS/
PROCL~TXONS
Proclamation issued declaring June 18-24, 1990, Amateur Radio Week
Roger Owen of J. F. Davidson Associates presented the City of
Temecula with a check for $500 to be used for the Traffic
Controller Program. The check was accepted by the City Manager.
PUBLIC ~OMMENTS
Doug Blois, 3050 Trade Water Court, commended the Council on work
that has been done, but requested more attention and money be
directed toward establishing parks in Temecula. He stated he did
not see any money allocated in the budget for parks.
Mayor Parks advised the audience that Parks and Recreation have a
completely separate budget under the Community Services District.
Chief Jim Wright, County of Riverside Fire Department, introduced
the new Temecula Battalion Chief, John Winder.
4~smls~6'~ 11~0 -1- 06~1~90
C~ty Council Minutes
June 12. 1990
Linda Cloughan, 41304 Bravos Ct., coordinator of NeighborhoodWatch
Program, congratulated the Council on what has been accomplished
and publicly thanked Councilmember Birdsall for her strong
leadership role. Ms. Cloughan thanked citizens who have worked
hard to bring issues to the Council's attention for the good of the
community.
Mayor Parks requested the removal of Item No. 4, Councilmember
Lindemarts requested the removal of Items 3 and 10, and
Councilmember Mufioz requested the removal of Items 5 through 9 of
the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember
Lindemarts to approve Consent Calendar Items I and 2 as follows:
1. M4nutos
Approved minutes of May 22, 1990, and May 29, 1990 as mailed.
2. Resolution Approving Paymsnt of Domands
2.1 Adopted a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 90-58
A RE~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
~LLOWING CERTAIN CLAIM~ AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
~131IBIT A.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILHEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIg[EMBERS: None
3. Fee Soh®duls for City Clsrk's Departed,
Councilmember Lindemansquestioned whether the City would lose
money on a subscription fee for agenda packets at $175/year.
June Greek, Deputy City Clerk, answered that this would
reflect a cost savings for the City since the packet could be
duplicated at the same time the regular agenda packets are
processed. She explained that to duplicate agenda packets
separately not only requires a cost for duplication, but also
4~%12~0 -2- 06/21~0
~. C~t¥ Co-nc~l M~nutes June ]2. ]990
necessitates extra staff time.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember
motion to approve the Fee Schedule for
Mufioz seconded a
the City Clerk's
Department and adopt a resolution as follows:
RESOLUTZON NO. 90-Sg
A RBBOLUTXON O~T]LB CXTY COUNCIL OFT HE CXTY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING A PBBSC!FgDULEIPORTHB CITY CLERK'S DEPARTMENT.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Tentative Parcel MaD 21383 - Second ~tension of T{uo
Ross Geller, Acting Planning Director, stated he received a
request from the applicant to continue this item for two
weeks.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Moore to set this matter for public hearing on
July 24, 1990.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemaas,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
P,1ot Plln 10863, Revised No. ,1
Councilmember Mufioz asked about the landscaping planned for
this restaurant.
Ross Geller, stated the area will be extensively landscaped.
He said condition No. 14 requires a detailed landscaping plan.
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to approve Plot Plan 10863, Revised No. 1.
4b~12~0 4- 0~21~
C4ty Council Minutes June 12. 1990
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIT/.EMBERS: None
6. Pi~Ge~ MIo 23S87
Councilmember Mufioz asked the purpose of the request to divide
the 8.34 acres.
Tim Setleft, Acting City Engineer, stated it is the intention
of the owner to sell each lot separately.
Diane Tannon, representing Linkletter Properties, stated each
of the three lots will be sold separately with different uses
planned for each lot.
Mayor Parks stated the specific plot plans will come before
Council for approval.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Lindemans to receive and file Parcel Map 23687.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCII,~EMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
7. F4-al Traot MaD No. ~1760
Councilmember Nufioz stated that the Traffic Mitigation Fees
are the lowest item listed on fees paid. He asked whether
this would change or whether the City plans to accept these
fees.
City Manager Aleshire said the City is now in the process of
studying a complete developer fee structure. He feels when
this is completed, there will be higher fees levied for
traffic mitigation.
Councilmember Mufioz questioned the receive and file
4U~11~6~2~) ~ 06/21~
..... C4t¥ Council Minutes June 12. 1990
recommendation. Tim Serlett responded saying
recommendation means approval of final tract map.
the
Councilmember Lindemane asked why fiscal impact for this
project has not been determined, and expressed a desire to
have fiscal impact determined on all projects approved.
City Manager Aleshire said that ~any cities require a fiscal
impact statement and this is one thing the Planning Commission
should look into.
Ross Geller, Planning Director, stated normally staff will
look into fiscal impacts, however, this project predates both
staff and the City Council.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
~otion to receive and file Final Tract Map No. 21760.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBF~S:
Birdsall, Lindemane,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
8. F4nal Tract Map No. 21820
Councilmember asked if this tract is restricted to septic
tanks only. City Engineer Tim Serlett answered that this
tract will have only septic systems and that the project has
been approved by the County Health Department.
It was moved byCouncilmember Moore, seconded byCouncilmember
Mufioz to receive and file Final Tract Map No. 21820.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsal i, Lindemane,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOF. S:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
· esolution of Intention to Vacete a Portion of Mercedes Street
And Set · Public H®-r4nq.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
C4ty Co-nc41M4nutes June 1R, 1990
Councilmember Mufioz to adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 90-60
A RESOLUTION OPT HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMBCULA
~ffq)RnXNG ITS INTENTION TO VACATB A PORTION OP MERCEDES
· TH~ET NORTHNEST~BLY OF 6TH STB~FT B~D SETTING A PUBLIC
wa~TNG T~HEON PUB~UA~T TO THB AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY
(~PTBR 3; PJdtT 3, D~BXON 90P~B B~B~B ~HX~YB
Councilmember Birdsall asked how wide an area would be noticed
by mail. Tim Serlett, City Engineer, answered property owners
within 300 feet of the property. Councilmember Birdsall asked
that the 300 foot notification requirement be looked at for
increase in the future.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
10. CO-~oil Appointments
None
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to appoint Councilmember Mufioz to serve as
representative to the Riverside Transit Area; to confirm
Councilmember Birdsali's appointment to the League of
California Cities Committee on Community Services and to
appoint Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans tothe Eastern Municipal Water
District Compostins Project Monitoring Committee.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
11.
Resolution Regardina Reh~bursemont f,~om Proseeds of
aert4fioatas of Part4c.4Dat.4nq .4n aonnoot40n w4th the P~ODOS®d
C,4tv Wall Fin%no4nq
City Manager Aleshire reported that the City Council
authorized staff to go forward with the purchase of Windsor
4~disms~'~12%90 .~. 0~21/90
C4tv Counc41M4nutes ~ne 1~. !990
Properties. He stated the first report from Harry Clark, Muni
Financial Services suggested the following action:
1. Designate Burke, Williams and Sorensen as Bond Counsel.
Authorize Financial Consultant to prepare a proposal for
City to issue $5 million in notes.
3. Designate M.L. Stern as underwriter.
Mr. Aleshire said these are the first steps in moving ahead
with the City Hall purchase.
Councilmember Lindemarts asked if a bond issue can not be
worked out, does this cancel the $75,000 payment. City
Attorney Fields stated this is correct.
Councilmember Birdsall said it is her understanding one of the
reasons for choosing Windsor Properties, was because should a
purchase not be immediately possible, a lease arrangement
could be made. She asked why capital improvements have not
begun.
City Manager Aleshire stated within two weeks, staff will have
a proposal before the Council for the tenant improvements.
Councilmember Birdsall asked how long tenant improvements will
take. Mr. Aleshire said it can be done within 90 days, but an
interim plan to house staff will be in place within 30 days.
Mayor Parks asked staff to give the Council a time frame for
these improvements.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded
Councilmember Moore to adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION MO. 90-61
A RESOLUTION OFT HE CXTY COUNCXL OFT HE CITY OF T~MBCULA
PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS MADE BY TH~ Cz~nr ZlI' ~O~NECTXON
NZTH THE ACQUISITION OF A CITY ~]~LL FACILITY ME TO BE
]~LDE ZN~NTZCZPATION O~R~ZK~iln~'nb~ iP~O~ THE PROCEEDS
PARTICIPATION TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY AND
AUTHORZSZNG AND DIRECTING C~T~IN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT
THBP~TO.
and to designate Burke, Williams and Sorensen as Bond Counsel,
to authorize the financial consultant to prepare a proposal
4~MJlllm~6~11~gO .%
City Counc41 Minutes
June 12. !990
for the City to issue $5 million in notes, and to designate
M.L. Stern as underwriter.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RBCBSS
Mayor Parks called a recess at 7:55 PM. The meeting was reconvened
following the Community Services District Meeting at 8:50 PM.
12. ~ ZNT~qt0~RZBDZCTXON~n PRBTR~TMBNT AGREEMENT
City Manager Aleshire reported the staff recommendation is to
authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement withEMWDto cover
pretreatment services. He stated the City needs to grant
authority to EMWD to enforce it's program. Mr. Aleshire
introduced Mike Creighton, and John Gonzales of Eastern
Municipal Water District to give a report.
Mr. Creighton introduced John Gonzales, Senior Industrial
Waster Inspector. Mr. Gonzales stated this is a draft
agreement which should be adjusted to the needs of the City,
and stated he would be happy to meet with legal counsel to
make any necessary adjustments. He said the City may want to
review other City's drafts. He emphasized that this agreement
is necessary because there are currently industries within
City limits that are in noncompliance.
City Attorney Fields recommended directing staff to meet with
EMWD and bring back a proposal in a timely fashion.
CounciLember Mufioz asked that the wording on Item No. 8,
regarding the right to enter private property be addressed.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to direct staff to meet with Eastern Municipal Water
District and bring back to the City Council a proposal in a
timely manner and acceptable form.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
4U~lmm%6~12%90 -.l- 06/21/90
City Counc41 Minutes ~,ne 12. 1990
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
13. Cons{deration of Reg4onal PtEk~nd O~en Spaoe D4str4ot
City Manager Aleshire stated this is a resolution presented at
a previous meeting. He said the City has received comments
from citizens and groups endorsing this District. The
recommendation is to approve the resolution.
Mayor Parks stated WRAG has been presented with three options
available to City Councils:
City Council may adopt the resolution during the meeting
and become a participant of the District.
City may set an advisory measure on the November Ballot
to allow citizen input on the additional taxation. This
would require LAFCO approval for City participation in
the District after the November election.
®
City may choose to take no action at this time and may
annex to the District at a later time. This annexation
would also require LAFCO approval.
He said the recommendation by the staff of the Western
Regional Association of Governments is to endorse Joining the
District.
Councilmember Mufioz stated he would like the City to take
Option No. 2 and let the voters decide whether they are
willing to be taxed for this District. He said citizens
should have the option of keeping all taxes for parks on a
local basis instead of giving a large portion to a regional
effort.
It was moved byCouncilmember Muff.z, seconded byCouncilmember
Lindemans to set an advisory measure on the November Ballot to
allow citizen input on the additional taxation.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he has no problem with $30 per
household for parks, however it is his understanding that some
of the funds would go toward augmenting general funds.
Mayor Parks stated he agrees with allowing the voters to
decide on the November Ballot, but stated Council needs to
send a message to the voters either in support or opposition
to this District.
City Counc~ 1 M~nutes June ] 2. 1990
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsa 11, Lindemarts,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 9:10
PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:11 PM.
14. ~ousehold HasJrdous Waste P~oqram &rid Waste O41 Collection
City Manager Aleshire stated this item is on the agenda at the
request of Councilmember Muffoz. He introduced Mike Shetler,
Supervising Hazardous Materials Management Specialist, County
of Riverside, to give a presentation.
Mr. Sh~tler %ntroduced the Council to a mobile waste
collection pro]ect. Products being collected are waste oil
paints, automotive batteries, used oil, etc. He stated this
is a pilot program that has been operating for approximately
two months. He indicated this program could be in place in
the Temecula area by November or December.
Mr. Shelter also said there is State legislation currently
being worked on now that would put a service charge on oil,
whereby waste oil could be returned to the store or gas
station where it was purchased for a rebate.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if this program should be
administered by the City instead of the County. Mr. Shetler
said ultimately more facilities will be needed, at this point
the County is trying to establish a workable program.
Mayor Parks stated the City is currently contracting with the
County for Health Services. He asked if the mobile waste
project was available through Health Services or whether the
City would be charged an additional fee.
Councilme~ber Mufioz asked what individuals should do until
December when they currently have a need to dispose hazardous
wastes. Mr. Shetler suggested safely storing these items
until then. He also stated that Chief Auto Parts is currently
accepting used oil.
Mayor Parks asked if other cities coordinated this problem
with Waste Management Contracts. Mr. Shetler stated that in
some cities, i.e. Palm Desert, trucks are sent twice a week to
C4t¥ C~nc~l M~nutes ~ne 12. !990
pick up hazardous wastes.
Councilmember Nufioz asked the City Attorney if a draft
ordinance requiring all service stations in the City to accept
used oil, has been worked on.
City Attorney Fields stated it has not as yet been looked
into. He said an ordinance of this nature must be consistent
with State Law so it is not preempted.
Councilmember Lind.marts suggesting contacting the League of
Cities and asking what other cities are doing.
Councilmember Mufioz suggested the City take two steps:
Investigate the possibilities of an ordinance to be
applied to all service stations.
2. Contact Chief Auto Parts -.Explore possibilities.
Nayor Parks expressed his concern that such an ordinance would
only deal with used oil and not the other hazardous waste
products.
City Manager Aleshire asked whether the County's mobile
program could be expedited and brought to Temecula in a month
~nstead of November or December. Mr. Shetler stated that this
program is safer in cooler temperatures when the Summer months
have passed. He also said a suitable site is very important
to the safety of this program.
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz seconded by Councilmember
Lind.mens to direct staff to begin to explore the creation of
an ordinance requiring all service stations in Temecula to
accept used oil from the community.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed two concerns:
This ordinance would only address used oil and not all
hazardous wastes.
~uestionedwhether gas stations that serve food, such as
a mini-mart could legally take used oil.
Councilmember Moore expressed her opposition to this motion
stating she favored a more comprehensive solution that would
address all forms of hazardous waste materials, not Just used
oil.
The motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
4~diamm~12~O -11- Oral,gO
City Council Minutes June 12. 1990
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Moore
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
Mayor Parks called a recess at 9:40 PM. The meeting was reconvened
at 10:00 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember
Mufioz to extend the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was
unanimously carried.
15. Agrasent w4th County of R{vars4de tnvironmant%l Health
Servioes for Review of Sewage D4sposal Svstas
City Manager Aleshire stated staff recommendation is to
approve this agreement allowing the County to continue
reviewing development with projects in regard to sewage and
septic systems and water systems. He stated the County is
currently running this programs, the City collect fees from
developers for this service to defray the cost.
Mayor Parks asked if it would be possible for developers to
obtain permits in the City, instead of in Riverside. Mr.
Aleshire stated that when plans are originally filed, the City
will collect a fee, send the reports to the County, and the
County will participate in the review process. He said,
however, that when a permit for a septic system, from the
County is needed this would require a trip to Riverside.
Councilmember Birdsall asked if these permits could be
obtained at the new County building. Mr. Aleshire said that
at this time, permits are only available in Riverside.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to authorize the Mayor to enter into an agreement with
the County of Riverside to review such applications and plans
for private, commercial and industrial sewage disposal systems
to assure compliance with the Uniform Plumbing Code, and
direct City staff to collect the necessary fees for this
review at the time and place the plans/specifications are
submitted for review.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
C4 t¥ Counc4 1 M4 nutes
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June 12. 1990
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
None
None
16. )dOpt4On Of the sgg0-gs F4somX Year
City Manager Aleshire reported Council has reviewed the budget
on several occasions and this updated version calls for
$12,000,000 for general services of the City. This does not
include Parks and Recreation, the CSD Budget. Staff
recommendation is to approve the resolution adopting the
budget and establishing controls on changes of appropriations.
Mr. Aleshire said a cash flow analysis was distributed to the
Council which shows the projected revenues and expenditures by
month for the 12 months beginning July 1, 1990.
Councilmember Lindemans requested changing Section 3,(B) of
the resolution adding the wording "with the approval of the
City Manager" and Section 3(C) adding "with the approval of
the City Council". He stated he spoke with Mr. Dixon who had
no problem with the changes.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemarts, seconded by
Councilmember Birdsall to adopt Resolution No. 90-62 with
amendments in section 3(B) adding the wording "with the
approval of the City Manager" and Section 3(C) adding "with
the approval of the City Council" entitled:
REBOLUTXON 90-62
A RESOLUTION OFT HE CITY COUNCIL OFT HE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL OPtTING BUDGET FOR THE
FISCAL ~ 1990-91 FOR THE CXTY OF T~M~CUL~ AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON C~ANGES IN ~PPROPRZATZONS FOR
THB V~IOUf D~PAHTM~NT BUDgeTS.
City Manager Aleshire stated this change will be quite
restrictive to department heads, hampering flexibility.
Councilmember Moore stated she felt these changes were very
constraining to the City Manager, making it difficult to use
available funds.
Councilmember Mufioz said he felt it is important for Council
to carefully review how funds are allocated.
City Council Minutes
June ~2. 1990
Mayor Parks said since Mr. Dixon had no objections to the
changes, he would support the motion.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
17.
Cooperative &areaent with County of Riverside to Prov4de F4re
Proteotio~. Fire Prevention° Rescue. and Medical Aid for the
C4ty of Te~eoula
City Manager Aleshire reported staff recommendation is to
approve the contract with the County of Riverside and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. He said this is
funded by $853,957 in City funds and money raised through the
Assessed Fire tax levy. Mr. Aleshire said if taxes are higher
than estimated, the City's share would be reduced.
Councilmember Lindemans questioned the method of payment on
page two of the agreement, (b).
Jim Wright, stated the City will be billed quarterly for
services rendered. He explained that if the County delayed
extra staff for a period of time, the City would not be billed
for extra personnel.
Councilmember Lindemarts asked staff if the cash flow issue had
been addressed.
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Director, stated she understood the
City will pay a total of $853,000. She said the assessors
office will be completing their evaluation by the end of this
month, the City's tax credit will be known then. Ms. Henry
suggested applying this credit to the first billing.
Council~ember Lindemans questioned why the contract is for
three years, instead of one year. Councilmember Birdsall
explained the reason for the three year contract is because of
training and staffing. Training involves four to six months,
Baking it impractical to enter into a one-year contract when
half the period would be used in training.
Mr. Wright stated a three year period would make it possible
to establish a consistent program, and then contract annually
after that time.
City Counc~ 1 M4 nutes
~ne 12, 1990
Councilmember Lindemens asked for an explanation of the Mutual
Aid section. Mr. Wright explained this pertains to aid to
other cities in a major fire situation, where units assigned
to the City of Temecula are used elsewhere. The first 24
hours is free under the State Mutual Aid System. Any time
after that, the costs would be reimbursed to the City.
City Attorney Fields stated he had discussions with County
Counsel on the indemnity clause. He recommended the City
Council approve this contract, ~ubJect to the approval by the
City Attorney as to the indemnification clause.
Councilmember Nufioz asked that the payment clause be made
clearer.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Moore to approve the Fire Department agreement
with the County subject to the approval of the City Attorney
of the indemnification and payment for services clauses.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemens,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILE,]~BERS: None
18.
Cooperative Aqrement with County of
W-foroement Servioel to the City of Temecula
City Manager Aleshire presented the recommendation to approve
the contract with Riverside County for law enforcement,
subject to the condition that the City Attorney approve the
wording of the indemnity clause.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if in Section 10 the City is
agreeing to pay $3.1 million or whether this is wide open.
Captain Sayre stated the hourly rate for the basic service is
adjusted according to cost of living, etc. He said that the
budget reflects these increases.
Councilmember Lindemens asked if City of Temecula badges and
emblems will be worn on officer's uniforms. Captain Sayre
stated these will be provided without charge to the City.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to approve the Sheriff's Contract subject to the City
Attorney's review of the indemnity section.
City Counc4] M4nutes June 12. 1990
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILE~BERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Mayor Parks seconded a motion to
extend the meeting 15 minutes. The motion wasunanimously carried.
19. !'~ D,4eao randf i] 1
City Manager Aleshire stated this is a request to authorize
the City Manager to extend the contract with PhilAnthony and
Bill Mecham to represent Temecula in continuing hearings
concerning San Diego North County Landfills. Mr. Aleshire
stated there was a meeting held today, June 12, 1990 in
Fallbrook which the Mayor attended.
Mayor Parks stated there was a great amount of opposition to
these lands fills. He said there were approximately 600
people in attendance, the majority in opposition to these land
fills. The County of San Diego received 1,413 negative
responses and inquiries about the intent of the EIR. He said
there is an element of the San Diego general plan specifing
trash should be disposed of in the areas where it is
generated. Most of the trash proposed for this area is
generated in the San Diego North County coastal areas.
Mayor Parks said he gave a verbal presentation to the San
Diego Planning Co~ission, and stated he felt it necessary to
continue this effort at the Planning Commission level and also
the Board of Supervisors level. He asked that the City of
Temecula be notified of any public meetings, as well as the
County of Riverside.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall to extend the contract
with Phil Anthony and Bill Mecham to represent the City.
The ~otion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
- C4tv Counc41 N.4nutes June 12. 1990
Mayor Parks stated another meeting of the Planning Commission
will beheld on July 10, 1990 in San Diego. The amendments to
the General Plan regarding the landfills will then go before
the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, July 25, 1990.
CITY MANItGE~ P.~PORT
City Manager Aleshire stated the Council has received a copy of a
draft letter to Supervisor Abrahams requesting approval by the
County of the agreements the Council has approved tonight and other
agreements that are in the works. He requested Council's comments
on this letter this week.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
No report given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Moore asked if the Council needs to confirm her
appointment to the League of California Cities Housing and
Community and Economic Development Committee.
Councilmember Birdsall advised she will be absent next week.
Mayor Parks thanked staff for an excellent job putting all the
agreements and, the budget together.
~DJOUP~tENT
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz,
Lindemans to adjourn at 10:50 PM.
carried.
seconded
It motion
by Councilmember
was unanimously
Next meeti~g~ June 19, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujo1 Street, Temecula, California.
4~dim~6~12~O -17- 06~21/90
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A.
follows:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as
Section 1:
That the following claims and demands as set forth in
Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager and that
the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $114,245.29.
Section 2:
The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of lune, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald I. Parks, Mayor
~Iune S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
2/R~o1/76 061ZZ190 11:&3~m
tJO
~0"
~,11~
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
0
0
0
_1
.-I
n,o
0'0
n
>.
Z
0
0
O'
0
0
0
0
0
0
~kl~ U
o o § g ° ooo o o o
0 000 0 0 O, 0
J oc; J c;c; c; c; c; J c; Jc;J' j c; c;! c;
I
c; c; c; j j c; c;I c; J c; JJ
~m
OIL
I~ I~. 0 0
.,0 0
0 0
Ou
o
u
0 t~
0
O0
i
O0 0 0 0
c; C; c; J Jc; J c; J ,o c; c;
CITY OF TEMECULA
&G END & REPORT
H~G= 6/26/90
DEPT: Finance
TITLE:
City Treasurer's Report for the
Month Ending May 31, 1990
DEPT HD y~~
CITY ATT
CITY MGR ~
RECOMMENDATION= That the City Council receive and file the City
Treasurer'a report for the month ending May 31, 1990
DISCUSSION=
A report to the City Council regarding the City's
inveltment portfolio is required as part of ~overnment
Code Section 53646. In addition, a report from the City
Treasurer regarding receipts, disburlements and fund
balance il required by Government Code Section 41004.
The accompanying report for the month ending May 31, 1990
metl both of these Government Code requirements.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT
City Treaeurer's Report for the Month Ending May 31, 1990
City of Temecula
City Tre&surer's Report
For the Month Ending May 31, 1990
Cash Activity
Beginning Balance, May 31, 1990
Cash Receipts - Revenues
Cash Disbursements
$766,682
441,063
(165,646)
Cash and Investments as of May 31, 1990
$1,042,099
Cash and Investment Portfolio as of May 31, 1990
Institution
Yield
Maturity Balance
Money Market
Demand Deposits
Petty Cash
Certificate of Deposit
Local Agency Investmt Fund
Overland Bank
Overland Bank
N/A
Overland Bank
State Treasurer
Cash and Investments as of May 31, 1990
6.50%
4.75%
N/A
7.50%
8.52%
N/A $193,125
N/A 17,656
N/A 350
6/20/90 50,968
N/A 780,000
$1,042,099
AB# 4
MTG: 6/26/90
DEPT= Finance
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY OF TEME CULA
AGENDA REPORT
TITLE
Statement of Revenues and
Expenditures for the Six Months
Ending May 31, 1990
That the City Council:
1)
2)
3)
DEPT HTTY~
CITY A
CITY MG~
Receive and file the Statements of Revenues and
Expenditures - Budget and Actual for the Six Months
Ending May 31, 1990.
Amend the 1990 budget for Community Services by $1,000
Amend the 1990 budget for Community Development by $60,000
DISCUSSION:
The attached statements summarize the City's operations
for the six months ending May 31, 1990.
The excess of general fund revenues over expenditures
is $232,361 for the six months.
Eighty-one percent of General Fund revenues were received
as of May 31, 1990.
The City received its third estimated sales tax payment
in the ~mount of $224,700. Actual sales tax collected in
the City will not be reported to ul by the State Board of
Equalization until June or July.
During the 1990 fiscal year the County has been collecting the City's
transient occupancy tax, which results in delays to the City creating
the indicated variance from estimated revenue.
Sixty-six percent of budgeted appropriations were expended or
encumbered as of May 31, 1990. Hiring delays account for much
of the savings.
Road fund revenues of $70,012 were received during the
month ending May 31, 1990. The City has not yet
received Measure A or Local Transportation (LTF) funds.
We expect to begin receiving LTF payments during June.
No Measure A monies will be received until a CIP plan is
is submitted to the County.
No road fund revenues have been expended to date.
Staff recommends that the 1990 budget for Community Services
be increased by $1,000 to cover additional consulting fees
related to the CSD 1990/91 assessment.
FISCAL IMPACT=
ATTACHMENT:
During May, the planning and engineering fees collected during April
and May were identified ·s to &mounts collected on behalf of the
County and the related adjustments ·re reflected on the May 31
financial statements.
When the 1990 budget was adopted we did not anticipate collecting
planning and engineering revenues or performing those services until
July 1. Therefore, we ·re reco~mending · budget ~mendment of $60,000
for planning and engineering services.
$1,000 increase in budgeted appropriations for Community
Services and $60,000 for Community Development for FY 1990.
Statement of Revenues - Budget and Actual - Special Revenue
Funds for the Six Months Ending May 31, 1990
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual
General Fund for the Six Months Ending May 31, 1990
Statement of Expenditures - Budget and Actual - General Fund
by Department for the Six Months and Ending May 31, 1990
RESOLIYI'ION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEME~ AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR
1~-90 BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE $1,000 FOR THE
PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL
COMMUNITY SERVICES CONSULTING FEES AND
CAPITAL OU'I]~Y
The City Coundl of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1:
That the FY 1989-90 Annual Budget of the City of Temecula is
hereby amended to appropriate $1,000 for Community Services
Department Consulting Fees.
SECTION 2:
The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 26th day of June, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATI'EST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEALI
RESOLU~ON NO. 90-
A RESOLIYrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEbiF_~A ~ING ~ FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE $60,000 FOR THE PURPOSE
OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY
DEVF~OPM~NT DEPARTMENT CONSULTING FEES.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1:
That the FY 1989-90 Annual Budget of the City of Temecula is
hereby amended to appropriate $60,000 for Community
Development Department Consulting Fees.
SECTION 2:
The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVI~ AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
0 (
N
N
N ,lb
N O0
N O0
II CO
N
N
N
CO t,-' II CO
00) 0 N
N
N
N
N 0
N
N
N
N
N
N
00~0 # 0
0000 II i~
~ 0
A
~ 0 ~
0 ~l ~-
0 c1'~
0
dP d~d~d~ rt'
0 ~00~0~
0 ~0~~
0
Oo~
im
I-,D,
· . t-,-
r~
0 m
I
C
I
+
N
#
N ~
# ~
N
N I~
N ~,~
# ~,
N O~
N ~.~
N
#
N
# ~
N
N ',
N ~
N
#
0 0~
0 ~
0 0~ 0
~) ~ ~
I
I
II
I
O0
O0
I
0
I~ n
r? I.I
0
0
0
0~
0
0
0
0
000
000
0
0
0
0
r~
0 ~ ~
0 ·
~ r~
CT~O
r~
#
#
#
#
#
I
I
I
#
II
I
I
N
I
I
IN
I
I
N
·
m
O~
0 ~
0 0~
O~
4-
O0
O0
000
00~
0
I
I
I:
rr
0
N
II
N P
I 0
# 0
# C)
# 0
N
II
N '~
N ~,
N ~
I
I
N
I f~
N ~
#
N
N
N
N
N
#
N
N
N
N
I
#
N
#
I
I
I m
#
I
I
I
I
N
I
I
I 0
i
II
II
II
It
I
it
If
II
II
II
#
ii
II
I
II
ii
I
It
II
II
#
N
N
II
I
II
#
It
#
#
#
#
N
N
#
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
It
ii
II
ii
I
I
I
ii
I
II
0
rr
o
0
o
0~
~D
~ 0
~D 0
I~ 0
0 I~
0 u~
0
0
O~
0
0
C~ ·
II
II
II
II tn
# 0
II -
# 0
II 0
II 0
#
#
# 0~
# m
#
II
II
II ~-.
II 0
# ,.
II 6.1
II 4~
N
N
II
#
II
II
II ,.
N t~
# Ox
IN
II
#
#
II
# ·
II 0
II 0
N
IN
N
#
IN
IN
#
II
II -.
II ~0
II 0
II
('!
0
('1'
# o
I 4:.
li 4~
# -.
II 4:.
II (x)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
I
ul (x)
0 ~o
0 0~
t/I 0
0o~
01~
A
00~
Ol~
0
4*
Ox~,
g
d~
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
O0
O0
4~ 0
· ,4 0
0
~0
0
~
I~ cr
+
,~ 0 I-'*
0 I~ I~
ID
rr
H
N
It
N
H O~
N '-
N O~
N C:)
N C)
N
II
N
N ~
N '
N ~
N
N
N
H
N
N db
N '.
N C::)
N ~
N O0
N
N
N
N
N
N
II t...*
N C:)
N '
N ~
li
II
N
N
II
I O~
II '.
I CO
II
li
II
II
II
II
II
li
N
II
II
N O~
II ',--
0
#
#
# ~-~
N O~
# I~
N O~
# O~
N
N
N ~
N '.
N !~
N ~
#
#
#
N I~)
# ~
# ~
N )~
# I~
# ~
N
N
N
N
N
N
N ~4
N ~
# 0
# C)
# ~D
N
I
#
I 01
I ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
#
# ~
I 0
# ~)
#
o~
0
O~
0
0
+
dP dP ('f
I m
I
mm OD
mm O~
I I-,
I
mm
I ,,
I o
I
#
i
i o
i
0 000
0 000
0
0 0
CID ¢~
Co
0
0
0
e,,.) Oh,
!
.4-
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ~
MTG: ~1~1'~
DEPT :~~11~
TITLE:
A RESOLUTION TO CHANGE THE STREET NAME OF
KATHLEEN WAY TO R IOGE PARK DR IVE
DEPT HD~
CITY ATTY ~
CITY HGR ~/
RECOI~ENDATION
That the City Council APPROVE and ACCEPT Resolution No.
street name of Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive.
· changing the
DISCUSSION
A petition for a street name change was filed by Omdahl Enterprises, with the
County of Riverside. Prior to the City of Temecula incorporation, the intention
to change the street name from Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive was reviewed
by the County departments and a resolution prepared for the name change. Now
that the City of Temecula has incorporated, the County has transferred this
matter to the City for Council action. Omdahl Enterprises has contacted all of the
affected property owners and obtained letters of consent for the name change.
SUMMARY
All appropriate departments have reviewed the proposed street name change and
find the change consistent with the area theme.
~LUTION NO. ~
A RF~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECI~A CHANGING THE STREET NAME OF
KATIH, EEN WAY TO RIDGE PARK DRIVE
follows:
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as
WI~/~EAS, Sections 34091.1 and 34092 of the Government Code provides for changing
the name of a public street, and;
WIJ]/:REAS, the developer, Omdahl Enterprises has applied under the provisions of the
Government Code to change the name of Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive, to be consistent
with the area theme, and;
WIH/~,EAS, Omdahl Enterprises has contacted all of the affected property owners and
obtained letters of consent for the name change;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula determines and orders that the name of Kathleen Way be changed to Ridge Park
Drive.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
06/19/90
APR i ? 1989
O3ONTY OF RIVERSIDE PETITION FOR STREET HAME
The road currently known as ~//~Tt~! ~/=~/ ~.
in the W'~',~'/.,4F::_~_..uLA area is under petition for a name change
to IO]H~P. /:P~PY ~i~.. Please note reason for name change
request, by whom, and telephone number: W)~cj/~A/ Z[SSGC//kY-~?_~
All property owners abutting the easement are herewith given
the opportunity to sign this petition and express their opinion
towards the proposed name change. Please fill out this form and
mail to: Riverside County road Department, P.O. Box 1090~..
Riverside Ca. 92502, Attn= Kelly Henry, Street Names. <~
PLEASE PRINT
APPROVAL
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I t I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
t I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
9-6-89
'."!a~ chanz~ from Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Dr.
(Thomas Bros. pa~e 125 D-4)
To whom it may concern;
I, John Firestone,. as owner of lo~s 20 & Zl of P,M.
18254. do hereby a~ree to the chan~e of name from'
Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive. Thank You.
Sincerel.v yours
JOHN A. SVENNINGSEN
10 PHEASANT RIDGE ROAD
RYE, NEW YORK 10580
October 18, 1989
County of Riverside
Road Department
Right-a-Way Division
Name changes from Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive
(Thomas Bros. page 125 D-4)
To whom it may concern:
I, John Svenningsen, as owner of Lot 1 of PM 19626-2 and a portion
of PM 18254 Lot 19, do hereby agree to the change of name from
Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive. Thank you.
Sincerely,
John A. Svenning(]sen
October 12, 1989
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
ROAD DEPARTMENT
RIGHT-A-WAY DIVISION
RE:
Name change from Kathleen ~ay to Ridge Park Drive
(Thomas Bros. page 125 D-41
To whom it may concern;
I, All Parsa, as owner of Lot 2 of PM 19626-1, do hereby
agree to the change of name from Kathleen Way to Ridge Psrk
Drive. Thank You.
SinceflOurs,
October 12, 1989
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
ROAD DEPARTMENT
RIGHT-A-WAY DIVISION
RE:
Name change form Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive
{Thomas Bros. page 125 D-4)
To whom it may concern;
We, Preferred Equities, as owners of Lot 3 of PM 19626-1,
do hereby agree to the change of name from Kathleen Way to
Ridge Park Drive. Thank You.
resident
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
DEPT
TITLE:
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
DEPT HD.
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
RECOMM!~NDATION
It is recommended the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement
with Riverside County Road Department for maintenance of traffic signals and
safety lighting within the City for Fiscal Year 1990-91.
BACKGROUND
There are 15 intersections within the City which have traffic signals. These
signal and intersection lights need to be maintained on a 24-hour per day basis.
The County Road Department has trained technicians available to do the work.
It is recommended that the City contract with the County because the County is
familiar with the City streets and signals. Their contract can be canceled and
work awarded to competitive bid or done by City forces at any time in the future.
FISCAL IMPACT
County will bill the City for direct costs under this agreement. Estimated cost
per signal per year is $5000 or $75,000 for all 15 intersections. City has
budgeted $75,000 for Fiscal Year 1990-91 for this service.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TITLE:
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
DEPTHO ~J'~--~
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
RECOk~ENDATION
That the City Council APPROVE the attached agreement for maintenance of traffic
signals and safety lighting with the County of Riverside and authorize the Mayor
and the City Clerk to sign the agreement.
DISCUSSION
The attached agreement between the City and* County of Riverside is for
maintenance of traffic signals and safety lighting. The agreement covers
maintenance work on traffic signals and safety lighting installations located
wholly within the City of Temecula. A list of locations is provided with the
agreement.
The agreement provides for the County to bill the City on a time and materials
basis on a monthly basis. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon
thirty (30) days written notice.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE the agreement for traffic signal
and safety lighting maintenance with the County of Riverside.
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
LeRoy D. Smoot
ROAD CONHIS~O~ & COUNT? SURV~L'YOR
June 12, 1990
COUNTY ADH~ISTRA'fl~ C~NTT. R
~ ADOR~S:
P.O. BOX 1090
RIV!~RSR)K, CAUTORNIA 92502
(714) 757-6554
Frank Aleshire
City Manager
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
RE: AGREDENT FOR NAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
Dear Mr. Aleshire:
Enclosed is an Agreement between the City and the County for maintenance
of traffic signals and safety lighting.
Please have the City Council approve the agreement and have the Mayor
execute it on behalf of the City. Please return all three copies of
the Agreement to this office for submittal to the Board of Supervisors.
After Board approval, we will return a fully executed copy to you.
Very truly yours,
Acting Road Commissioner and County Surveyor
IFT:hn
Enclosures
cc: E.Cooper
R. Barrera
COUNTY AD~!]~RATIV~ C~'TF.R · 4080 LENON STREET · RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
$
?
9
10
11
1,1
15
16
17
18
19
AGREEMENT FOR
MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AND SAFETY LIGHTING
THIS AGREEMENT is between the County of Riverside
(hereinafter referred to as COUNTY) and the City of Temecula
(hereinafter referred to as CITY):
This agreement is for maintenance work provided by the
County Road Department on traffic signal and highway safety
lighting installations located wholly within the CITY as shown
on the attached Appendix.
IT IS AGREED:
1. COUNTY, through its Road Department, will provide routine
maintenance work on traffic signals, highway safety
lighting, flashing beacons, and other electrically-operated
traffic control or warning devices located in the CITY.
Said maintenance shall include inspection of signal system
and clean control cabinet once a month, telamp and clean
signal heads once a year, clean street lights once a year,
telamp street lights every three years, and provide
emergency call-out service.
2. CITY shall pay COUNTY for the cost of maintenance, and
emergency service, including all COUNTY costs for wages,
benefits, transportation, materials, and administrative
accounting for all the CITY location installations serviced
by the COUNTY.
?
3. Records for the maintenance work under this Agreement shall
be kept by the COUNTY covering the cost of all services
performed. Billing for the cost to CITY shall be made
1
$
?
10 ~.
11
12
15
16 7.
17
18
19
~0
91
8.
95
9?
monthly and shall include an itemized accounting of all
costs and services.
CITY shall pay for services within thirty (30) days after
receipt of billing from COUNTY.
Upon approval by the CITY, this Agreement shall become
effective on the date that this Agreement is approved by
resolution of the COUNTY Board of Supervisors. The
Agreement shall remain in force until terminated by thirty
(30) days written notice to the other agency.
Any notice required to be sent pursuant to this Agreement
shall be sent by regular mail, addressed as follows:
City Manager
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Road Commissioner
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
CITY and COUNTY covenant and agree that, except as otherwise
expressly set forth herein, COUNTY makes no representation
or warranty of whatsoever kind, nature or sort, either
express or implied, concerning the goods and services 'to be
furnished hereunder, AND COUNTY DOES HEREBY DISCLAIM ANY AND
ALL SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING SPECIFICALLY ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE CONCERNING ANY SUCH GOODS OR SERVICES.
The CITY shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the
COUNTY, its officers, agents, servants, and employees of and
from any and all liabilities, claims, demands, debt,
damages, suits, actions and causes of action of whatsoever
kind, nature or sort, including, but not by way of
limitation, wrongful death, personal injury or damage to
2
1
2
$
7
9
10
11
15
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
property, the expenses of the defense of said parties and
the payment of attorneys fees in any such claim or action,
arising out of or in any manner connected with the
performance of services and the furnishing of goods or
materials by COUNTY hereunder.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Dated:
Dated:
By:
Mayor
By: Chairman,
Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
Attest:
Gerald A. Maloney
Clerk of the Board
By:
City Clerk
By:
Deputy Clerk of the Board
Approved as to Form:
Approved as to Form:
By:
City Attorney
William C..Katzenstein
county c.o,,. sel
3
1
$
$
?
9
I0
11
15
16
17
18
19
20
o5:-~3o-90 27
28
APPENDIX
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTING INSTALLATIONS
THAT ARE OWNED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA
July 1, 1990
Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road
Rancho California Road and Diaz Road
Rancho California Road and Front Street
Rancho California Road and Ynez Road
Rancho California Road and Moraga Road
Via Montezuma and Front Street
Del Rio Road and Front Street
Margarita Road and Rancho California Road
Margarita Road and Rancho Vista Road
Mira Loma Drive and Rancho Vista Road
Margarita Road and Moraga Road
Ynez Road and Santiago Road
Ynez Road and Rancho Vista Road
Ynez Road and Pauba Road
Ynez Road and Solana Way
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ~ TITLE: ANNUAL SOILS AND MATERIAL DEPTHO ~
HTG: ~[z~lqo TESTING CONTRACT CITY ATTY
DEPT: ~.~,,,.~ CITY HGR~
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council authorize the City Engineer to solicit proposals for the
provisions of soils and material testing services for fiscal year 1990-1991.
DISCUSSION
The City of Temecula is in the process of assuming all responsibility for the
approval of plans and the field inspection for public improvements within the
public rights-of-way. The County of Riverside is transferring previously
approved plans and a number of projects currently under their inspection with
September 1, 1990, the anticipated transfer completion date.
The County Road Department previously provided these soils and material testing
services for subdivisions but was unable to provide services for utility service
trenching and other non-subdivision work. Testing for these other non-
subdivision items was provided by a variety of private soils testing companies.
A number of trench settlements have occurred where inconsistent testing and
monitoring of these tests was experienced.
The City of Temecula will need to provide or have provided similar soils and
material testing services. These services assure that appropriate pavement
thicknesses are specified for each project (consistent with soil characteristics and
anticipated traffic intensities), and that compaction of roadway sections, trench
backfill, and related work meet city specifications.
The advantage of having a primary or single-source provider of these services
is that of uniformity in policy and of control by the contracting agency, the City
of Temecula.
The benefits to be received will be a consistent, higher quality of compaction and
other construction controls, with fewer trench settlements and longer pavement
life with less maintenance costs.
FISCAL IMPACT
None anticipated. The proposed City of Temecula fee schedule provides that the
subdivider or other permittee will be charged for the actual cost to the City for
the soils and material testing services plus ten (10) percent for administrative
costs.
SUI¥1MARY
The City of Temecula needs to provide soils and material testing services in lieu
of previous County of Riverside services. A single provider of these services
directly under contract and control by the City is superior to the mixed past
experiences. The quality of finished projects will be improved and the actual
costs of these services plus administrative costs will be borne by the developer
or permittee.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: $ TITLE: RESOLUTION 90- DEPT HD ~
IqTG: &~/% ~lm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ CITY ATTY
DEPT: ;.~,,~.~.,~ EVen' PEARITS (PNIN)ES) CITY FIGR ~ J
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 90- adopting standards and
procedures for special outdoor event permits, to become effective on July 5,
1990.
DISCUSSION
This resolution establishes a procedure for applications for special outdoor event
permits to be approved at a staff level by the City Manager, with consultation
from the City Engineer. Resolution No. 90- contains the information required
of an applicant in order to obtain a permit. Certain notification requirements are
also part of the resolution, should a permit application be approved.
Any decision regarding the permit application pursuant to this resolution made
by the City Manager is directly appealable to the City Council.
Staff is requesting that this resolution become effective on July 5, 1990, since the
County of Riverside has processed all applications for the July q, 1990 holiday
period.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
.... RESOLLrI'ION NO 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING STANDARDS AND
PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL OUTDOOR EVENT
WH~:REAS, certain groups and individuals frequently desire to conduct parades and
cerlain other special enterprises, activities, and events on public properties in the City of
Temecula; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to maintain an orderly, fair, and expeditious
ImX:ess for controlling and regulating these events consistent with the protection of public
pr/4x~ty and the promotion of its best and most beneficial public use; and
IRHI/atEAS, the City deems that standards and procedures regarding the issuance of
special outdoor event permits are necessary for these purposes and in furtherance of the public
health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, ~~F'ORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T!~IECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following procedures shall be followed for the issuance of special
outdoor event permits:
A. The sponsor of such special outdoor event shall meet and confer with the City
Manager or designee regarding the special event and the effect, if any, on the City.
B. Application for a permit to hold a special outdoor event shall be made on forms
provided by the City. The application shall include a detailed description of the proposed special
eveat, including but not limited to the following:
(1)
The name and address of the applicant, and if the same be a corporation, the
names of its prindpal officers, or if the same be a parmership, association,
organization or fictitious company, the names of the parmers or persons
comprising the association, organization or company with the address and
~e, lephone number of each;
('2) The number of persons anticipated to be participating in the event;
(3) Purpose of the event;
(4) The date, hours, and precise location where the event is to be held;
3/Rems72 - 1 - 06114/90
The amount of any spectator, participant, entry, or other fee, if any, to be
charged in connection with the event;
Type and nature of any vehicles, equipment, or other apparatus to be used in
connection with the event;
The number and amplifying range of any sound amplifying systems to be used in
connection with the event;
Type of goods, wares, merchandise, food, or beverages to be sold or otherwise
provided to persons at the event;
The name and business address of any vendors who will be participating in the
event;
(10) Security plan for event.
The application shah be signed by the applicant under penalty of perjury and shah contain
an agreement whereby the applicant agrees to fully compensate the City for any damage to
public property, as well as to clean and otherwise restore the event site to the condition in which
it existed prior to the conduct of the event.
C. A 'major' special outdoor event shall be defined as one involving one hundred (100)
or more persons of requiring changes in normal traffic patterns regardless of the number of
persons involved. In the case of a major special outdoor event, the application for the special
outdoor event permit shall include a traffic control plan and a Waffic study. The following
elements shah be included in the traffic study:
(1) A fact sheet and time line.
(2)
Maps of the parade, bide or run courses, if applicable, which shall include both
overview maps and detailed layouts.
(3) Descriptions of the parade, bike or run courses.
(4) A traffic flow and diversion plan.
A street and highway closure schedule, and a plan for notification to every
residenee and business located on a street or highway subject to closure or detour
due to the special event.
(6) A listing of all affected intersections, and a traffic control diagrams(s).
A brief narrative describing course control, the set-up and clean-up for the special
event, the manner and extent of community notification, the extend of public
06114/90
relations for the special event all parking requirements, the necessary medical
support system, the manner of radio communications, an all insurance
documentation.
(s)
Any and all mitigation measures applicable to the special event and available to
lessen the impact on traffic access and safety.
(9) An executive summary of the special event.
(lo)
The traffic control plan shall be prepared in accordance with the *State Manual
of Traffic Control for Construction Maintenance Work Zones". Such Traffic
Controls Plans shall be produced on reproducible sheets (24' X 36").
D. The sponsor shall be required to submit an application processing fee of fifty dollars
($50.00) concurrently with the application documents.
E. Prior to the issuance of permit, the sponsor shall submit to the City proof of public
liability and property damage insurance, including products liability coverage, written by an
insurance company acceptable to the City in the limits set forth below, naming the City as an
additional insured; in the alternative, the City may require execution of a hold harmless
agreement, indemnifying the City for any personal injury or property damage arising from such
Public liability and property damage insurance shall be required in the following amount:
100 persons
250 persons
500/+ persons
$ 500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$2,500,000.00
F. The sponsor shall be required to meet with both the Police Department and the City
Traffic Engineer to discuss the results of the traffic study and to review the prepared Traffic
Control Plan. The Police Chief or his designee may require additional Police staff for the event
in addition to the City staff normally on duty. Any cost for such additional Police Staff shall
be paid by the applicant sponsoring the event. The rate of cost will be based upon the current
fiscal year extra division rate.
G. If the Traffic Engineer, in his discretion, recommends approval of both the Traffic
Control Plan and the Traffic Study, the City Manager shall submit a copy of both documents to
the City Council for review and comment.
H. Following City Council review and comments, the City Manager may approve the
application for the special outdoor event permit. Approval or denial of the application shall be
made by the City Manager within thirty (30) days after its filing with City Manager. The
applicant shall be promptly notified in writing of the decision of the City Manager.
3/Re,~m72 -~- 06114/90
I. As a condition to issuing a permit, the City Manager may impose reasonable terms
and regulations concerning the time and place of such event; the area and manner of conducting
such event; the maximum number of persons participating therein; the regulation of traffic, if
required, including the number and type of signs and barricades to be provided by the applicant,
if any, together with a plan of their disposition following the event; permissible decibel levels;
and such other requirements as he may find reasonable and necessary for the protection of
persons and property.
Issuance of any special outdoor event permit shall be conditioned on and subject to the
right of the City to summarily cancel, restrict, or modify such permit in order to facilitates or
accommodate any other duly approved or permitted special event, celebration, or activity. The
City Manager flmll mail to the applicant a notice of such cancellation, restriction, or
modification no later than thirty (30) days prior to the special event and shall take reasonable
and appropriate actions to reduce, minimize, or eliminate any inconvenience, hardship, or
burden as may result from such cancellation, restriction or modification.
I. An application for a special outdoor event permit may be denied on any of the
following grounds:
(1)
The applicant has failed or refused to provide the City with the information
referenced in the Sections above or any other information requested by the City
which is reasonable related to the conduct of the proposed event;
(2)
The applicant has knowingly made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement
of material fact in the application for a permit.
(3)
The building, structure, equipment or location of such special events does not
comply with or fails to meet applicable health, zoning, fire or safety requirements
imposed by law:
(4)
The activity or location of the activity is such as to unreasonably limit, obstruct,
or curtail the free flow of traffic on any public street or sidewalk;
The applicant has filed to comply with any of the conditions imposed pursuant to
Section I.
The conduct of the special event will unreasonably interfere with the public
peace, health, safety or welfare;
The applicant refuses to agree to or abide or comply with all conditions and
regulations attendant to issuance of the permit.
The City Manager shall notify the applicant in writing as to 'the reasons for denial of any
application for a permit.
06114/90
following:
(1)
(2)
(3)
by the
Upon appwval of the permit application, the City Manager shall so notify the
Policy department;
Fire department;
Public Works department;
(5) City Manager
L. A permit for any event issued hereunder may be summarily suspended or revoked
City Manager at any time when he has reason to believe that:
(1)
(2)
O)
Any of the grounds exist for which the original permit application could have
been denied; or
The health, safety, or welfare of persons or property would be endangered
because of real or threatened disaster, public calamity, riot or other emergency;
The event is or will significantly or materially deviate from the terms of the
pwposed event as described in the permittee's application or in supplemental
information provided to the committee; or
(4) The permittee is or will be unable to satisfy any condition of the permit.
Notice of such suspension or revocation shall be made in writing to the applicant.
M. Any decision made pursuant to Section I may be appealed to the City Council upon
payment of an appeal processing fee in an amount of fifty dolhrs ($50.00). The appeal may be
made by the applicant or by ten or more persons potentially aggrieved by the issuance of the
permit. Such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk no less than fifteen (15) days before the
proposed commencement date of the special event. The City Clerk shall forward copies of the
appeal to the City Council and the City Manager, who shall submit to the City Council a report
The City Council shall consider the appeal at a regular meeting or special meeting.
Written notice of the time and place the Council will consider the appeal shall be mailed by the
City Clerk to the person or persons who filed the appeal at least ten (10) days before the date
set for heating unless the applicant shall waive notice in writing.
3/Reom72 -~- 06/14/90
In any appeal, the City Council shall consider the application, the report of the case
submitted by the special events committee and other pertinent subject to the conditions, terms
and other pertinent subject to the conditions, terms and regulations set forth in this chapter. The
decision of the Council shall be final.
The City Clerk shall, within five (5) days after decision of the City Council, notify the
applicant in writing of the decision of the Council.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this
day of June, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks,
Mayor
June S. Greek
Deputy City Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on theday of June,
1990 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
3/Re0~72 -6- 06114/90
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: q
HTG: 4, .o.~ .q ~
DEPT
TITLE:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23513
JUNE 26, 1990
CITY
CITY HGR
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council RECEIVE and FILE Tentative Tract Map No. 23513.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Request Filed:
Case No.:
Applicant:
Representative:
Proposal:
Location:
Zoning:
Surrounding Zoning:
Surrounding Land
Uses:
Project Statistics:
County Planning, March 2, 1988
Tentative Tract Map No. 23513
Abhai Kumar Sawh
To-Mac Engineering
An 11 lot residential subdivision on 14.37 acres
North
R-R
North
South
East:
West:
side of Santiago Road westerly of Margarita Road
: R-R
: R-R
R-R
R-R
North: Natural terrain
South: Natural terrain
East: Natural terrain
West: One single family residence
Tentative Tract Map 23513 for 11 residential lots on
14.37 acres.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract No. 23513 is an application to subdivide a lq.t~ acre site into 11
parcels. The site consists of three vacant parcels of gently rolling hills with
grassland and coastal sage scrub and cactus. the project is located north of
Santiago Road and west of Margarita Road. Currently the site is zoned R-R, and
surrounding zoning includes R-R.
The request was filed for this project with the County on March 2, 1988. The
project was approved by the County Commission on March 14, 1990, and was
transmitted with a RECEIVE and FILE recommendation on May 18, 1990.
AREA SETTING
the project lies in an area characterized by gently rolling hills and some sharper
knolls and arroyos. The vegetation is apparently natural, containing cactus and
open grassland. Some portions of the subject site are open to natural vistas
which include the Santa Rosa mountains and portions of the Temecula Valley.
ZONING
The proposed site is zoned R-R (Rural Residential). The R-R district allows a
minimum density of 1/2 acre lot sizes. The proposed lot sizes are all in excess of
the minimum requirement.
SOUTHWEST AREA PLAN
The S.W.A.P. identifies this site and surrounding areas as 2 to 5 dwelling units
per acre. This project proposes a density which is generally one (1) unit per
acre.
GRADING
At the proposed density, substantial grading will take place. This would be
necessary in order to accommodate the proposed number of pads on the existing
terrain.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council REC:EIVE and FILE Tentative Tract Map No. 23513.
Zontng Area: Clty of Temecu]a
Supervtsorta] District: Ftrst
E.A. Number: 33455
Regional Team No.: One
TRACT NAP NO. 23513, AllENDED NO. 1
Planntng Commission: 03-14-90
Continued from 02-21-90
Agenda Item No.: 3-2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT
STAFF REPORT
10,
11.
12.
13.
Applicant:
Engtneer/Rep.:
Type of Request:
Location:
Existing Zoning:
Surrounding Zontng:
Stte Characteristics:
Area Characteristics:
Comprehensive General Plan
Designation:
Land Dlvtslon Data:
Agency Recommendations:
Letters:
Sphere of ~nfluence:
Abhal Kumar Sawh
To-Hac Engineering
Subdivide 14.37 acres tnto 11
residential parcels.
North of Santtago Road and ~/est of
Hargartta Road.
R-R
R-R
Vacant, gently rolltng terratn with
grassland and coastai sage scrub and
cactus.
Vacant natural terratn, single family
residences on large lots.
Southwest Area Community Plan
Land Use: Category ]]! Residential
Denstry: 1-2 du/ac
Total Acreage: 14.37
Total Lots: 11
DU Per Acre: 0.76
Proposed Htn. Lot Stze: 1.0
See Letter Dated:
Road: 03-08-89
Health: 04-19-89
Flood: 03-08-89
Ftre: 12-04-89
Buildtrig and Safety:
Land Use: 04-07-89
Gradtrig: 03-09-89
Elstnore Valley #unlclpal · #ater
District: 01-23-89
Elstnore Unton High School District:
01-04-89
Opposing/Supporting: Norm
Clty of Temecu]a
~CKGROIJND:
Tentative Tract No. 23513, Amended No. I ts an application to lubdlvtde a 14.4
acre stte Into 11 parcels. the site conststs of three vacant parcels of gently
rollln9 h111s with grass]and and coastal sage scrub and cactus. The pro3ect ts
located north of Santtago Road and west of Nargarlta Road. Currently the site
1s zoned R-R, and surrounding zontng Includes R-R.
TRACT NAP NO. 23513, AHENDED NO. 1
Staff Report
Page 2
general Plan
The project ts within the Southwest Area Community Plan. The land use
designation for the site is Residential 1-2 dwelllng units per acre, Category
Ill. The pollctes for Category II! tndlcate that adequate water and sewer
facilities, or adequate septic and well water facilities should be present In
the area. Zn addition, there should be road circulation. The Health Department
and the Eastern Hunicipal Water D~strict have indicated that the proposed project
would be acceptable, if the condJtions of approval are met. The Road Department
has also tndJcated that the road circulation will be adequate, tfthe conditions
of approval are met. Staff has determined that the project is consistent wlth
the Southwest Area Plan (SNAP) Category IZ! policies, and therefore, consistent
with the General Plan.
Land uses tn the project area Include vacant natural terrain, and some single
family residences on large lots. Staff has determined that the project is
compatible wlth existing land uses in the area.
Environmental Analysis
Environmental Analysts No. 33455 was prepared for this project. ~tems of concern
tncluded Hazardous Fire Area, wildlife and vegetation, archaeological resources,
water and sewer services, slopes, and schools. Staff requested and recetved on
archaeological report and biological report. The archaeological and biological
concerns w111 be mitigated through the conditions of approval. Staff has
determined that a Slope Stability report is required at thts ttme. Because Staff
has not to date received the Slope Stability report, a continuance of this
project is being recommended in order to allow ttme for the applicant to submtt
the Slope Stability report and to allow Staff adequate ttme to review the report.
The other environmental concern can be mitigated through the conditions of
approval.
FINDXNGS:
Tentative Tract Hap No. 23513, /mended No. 1, ls an application to
subdivtde'a 14.4 acre stte tnto 11 parcels.
2. The =tni=u~ proposed lot stze ts 1.0 acre.
e
The site consists of vacant gentle rolling hills with grassland end sage
scrub and cactus.
TRACT HAP NO. 23513, AHENDED NO. 1
Staff Report
Page 3
4. The site 1s zoned R-R and surrounding zontng ts R-R.
The project 11es wtthln the Southwest Area Community Plan, and the land
use designation ts Residential Category [[[, 1-2 dwelling unt%s per acre.
There is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or whtch will be studied within
a reasonable time (added at Planning Commission March 14, 1990).
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to an
interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is
ultimately inconsistent with the plan (added at Planning Commission March
14, lggO).
The project complies with all other applicable requires of state law and
local ordinances (added at Planning Commission March 14, 1990).
CONCLUSIONS:
Tentative Tract Map No. 23513, Amended No. 1 is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan Category II! land use designation and therefore with
the Comprehensive General Plan.
Tentative Tract Map No. 23513, Amended No. 1 is compatible with area
development.
RECOHHENDATION:
CONTINUANCE of Tentative Tract Map No. 23513, Amended No. 1, to allow time for
the applicant to submit the Slope Stability report and for Staff to revtew the
report.
DK:csf
2/14/90
TRACT ~P NO. 23513, AMENDED NO.
Staff Report
Page 4
FURTHER PLANNING CONSIDERATIC~S:
March 14, 1990
Tentative Tract Map No. 23513, Amended No. 1 was oontinued frc~ the
FebD~vy 21st Planning Ounnission hearing in order to all~ t/me for the
applicant to submit a slope s~ahility report for staff to review that
report. The report was received, however the County Geologist has not
yet completed reveiwing the report. Therefore staff again rec~,~ds
continuance of this case.
DK:bc
3/7/90
~ _ ~ I 8TOJ .HIM .OA ~\1' OTHI ~Q!VIQ eeU
I'~i--~i~-"a~' ' . ..... ~,R"O:IJ^o o.o.^, ~n~
--- 01 .glq e ~g' 318, 'K:)eme~ .WC~.Fl..ae.T ~' .::mS
'orr- JA~3TRA - OR C)~AITHA8 ~
'aa- YRA(:]HOD3~ - (JR ASUAq ~
='t
:
I Ill'.'
[-llll
!llll
.~ -'.
:i
I ~" ~ I c. , .!" '
~..~.A_UB~._~ ',U/A~ '
%2 ~/~ ..~ ~~DU/AC
~ ,, :... · · '
.;{'...;;';..~;};;.,., .
x2 1/2
j App. ABHAI KUMAR SAWH. ETAL &oc, r~,L ,,,~,
~ DIVE)E INTO 1/2 AC. MIN. LOTS .~,.~,~'~r,~
~. 7 T.SS..R.2W. illaeeeaorl Bk. 945 Pg.I0
~...,,. s,...'n^~o RD- ^RTER~^L -
~ ~ liD- SECONDARY- 88' "%,,,,.,.._"~e,w~ ~' ~1~ .
I~tVEFiSIL~ ' 'CO{JNT'Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23513
AHENDED NO. 1
DATE:
EXPIRES:
STANDARD CONDIT[ONS:
The following conditions of approval are for Tentative Tract No. 23513,
Amended No. 1, which will subdivide a 14.37 acre site Into eleven parcels
located north of Santiago Road and west of Nargarita Road in Rancho Santa
Rosa.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, Its agents, officers, and employees from any clatm, actlon, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, 1rs advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body
concernin9 Tentative Tract No. 23513, Amended No. 1, which action is
brou9ht within the time period provided for in California Government Code,
Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the
subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceedin9 against the County of
Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. [f the County fails
to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceedin9
or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460,
Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended
as provided by Ordinance No. 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance No. 460.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Offlce and two copies to the Department of Butldlng and
Safety. The report shall address the sotls stability and geological
conditions of the site.
If any grading if proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Butlding and Safety. The
plan shall comply wtth the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance No. 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 23513
AMENDED NO. 1
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
0,
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of County maintained
road right-of-way.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 03-08-8g,
a copy of which is attached.
Legal access as required by Ordinance No. 460 shall be provided from the
tract map boundary to a County maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road
Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the Road
Commissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within
the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall
be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor.
Water and sewage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with
the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter
dated 04-19-89, a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined
by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 03-08-89,
a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted
floodcontrol drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance No. 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall
be collected by the Road Commissioner.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outltned tn the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 12-04-89, a copy of
whtch is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
Butldtng and Safety Department - Land Use Sectton's letter dated
04-07-89, a copy of which is attached.
20.
21.
22.
23.
m~ su~3v~oer sna)m comply with the recommendations outltned in the County
Geologist's transmittal dated March 13, 1990, a copy of which is attached,
(Added at Planning C~ission on March 14, 1990),
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
Elsinore Union High School District's letter dated 01-04-8g, & copy of
which is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department
approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access
to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the Intent
and purpose of the subdivision approval.
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
A. All lots shall have a minimum size of 1.0 acres gross.
All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section
3.8C of Ordinance No. 460.
Cm
Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with
additional area pursuant to $ectlon 3.8B of Ordinance No. 460 and
so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area
in non-corner and through lots.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the R-R zone.
Prior to the RECORDATION of the final map, the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and SurveyDepartment
that all pertinent requirements outltned tn the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met:
County Fire Department
County Flood Control
County Health Department
County Planning Department
TENTATIVIE TRACT NO. 23513
AMENDED NO. 1
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
24.
25.
26.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints
Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to
delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed
with the office of the County Surveyor. .A copy of the ECS shall be
transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The
approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to
the Planning Department and the Department of Buildin9 and Safety.
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: "County Biological Report No. 404 was prepared for this
property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department.
Specific items of concern in the report are as follows: Sage Scrub
vegetation."
Be
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: "County Archaeological Report No. 1381 was prepared for
this property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning
Department."
Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS, the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
Ae
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a
guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for Individual phases
of development and shall include the following:
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the gradlng process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
whtch may be graded during the htgher probability rain months
of January through March.
3. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
4. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
Grading plans shall conform to Board-adopted Hlllstde Development
Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or Individual combinations thereof,
which exceed ten feet tn vertical height shall be modified by an
appropriate combination of a special terracing (benchln9) plan, tncrease
slope rat1. (t.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planttng combtried
wtth Irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a ftfteen (15) percent
grade.
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
27.
28.
29.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceed ten
(10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded incorporating the
following gradlng techniques:
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terrain.
Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
e
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves wtth radii
designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where
drainage and stability permit such rounding.
Where cut and/or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length,
the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS, the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding
property.
Building separation between all buildings Including fireplaces shall
not be less than ten (10) feet.
C. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS, the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply
wtth Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee requtred by that ordinance.
Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees requtred by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under
the Habttat Conservation Plan as Implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
OK:csf
2/14/90
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
BOAO CI]qMIS~IOI~J~ & COUNTY ~%TY~
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
March 8, 1989
COUWTY ADIqDqI1STRATlV[
P.O BOX 1090
ItJVERS~D~, CALJIrORNIA 925O2
(714) 787.6554
Re: TR 23513 - Amend #1
Schedule B - Team I - SMD#9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative
land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider
provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement
Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map
correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their
.T~ission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for
rther consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are
_~sential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as
though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred
to the Road Commissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/
or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage
easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as
follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions,
or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
o
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of
all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site.
In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article
XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the
quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of
streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities
as approved by the Road Department.
COU]FFY ADMINISTRATW~ ~ · 4080 ~ON STR]~L"F · RIVERSIDE, CAUFORNIA 92SO1
'R 23513 - Amend
~arch 8, 1989
10.
11.
Najor drainage is involved on this landdivision and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department.
#B# Street shall be improved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 105
Section B. {36'/60')
'A" Street northeasterly of Street "B" shall be improved
within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County
Standard No. 105, Section B. (36'/60')
Santiago Road shall be improved with 32 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 44 foot half width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 102,
Section B. {32'/44')
'A" Street southwesterly of "B" Street shall be improved
with 28 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 40 foot
part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County
Standard No. 105, Section B. (18'/30')
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No.
805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for
dedication.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of
road improvements does not imply acceptance for main-
tenance by County.
Standard cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throu9hout the
landdivision.
Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to
Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifi-
cations.
27.
28.
29.
EB:J~
constructed or i~%%ved wi; in' e ivision. county
Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the
subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If
not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO
for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in
accordance with Governmental Code Section 25210.1.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this project shall be coordinated with this
project and shown on the street improvement plans.
A striping plan is required for Santiago Road. The removal
of the existing striping shall be the responsibility of the
applicant. Traffic signing and striping shall be done by
County forces with all incurred costs borne by the
applicant.
Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit
district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make
application for and pay for their reapportionment of the
assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district
unless said fees are deferred to building permit.
Very truly yours~
Elmer Baumgarten
Subdivision Engineer
Ordinance 461.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimum
50' tangent measured from flow line.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along Santiago Road
in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb
sidewalks).
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and
knuckles shall be 35 feet.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside
County Standards. A minimum of four feet of full height
curb shall be constructed between driveways.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from
the face of curb.
The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient
public offsite rights of way to provide for a primary
access road to a paved and maintained road. Said access
road shall be constructed in accordance with County
Standard No. 106, Section B. (32'/60') at a grade and
alignment approved by the Road Commissioner.
Said offsite access road shall be the easterly extension of
Santiago Road and to Santiago Road or as approved by the
Road Commissioner.
Said offsite access road shall be the westerly extension of
Santiago Road to Santiago Road or as approved by the Road
Commissioner.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer
shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department,
& cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic
signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the
time of payment, he may enter into a written agreement with
the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance
of a building permit.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Lot access shall be restricted on Santiago Road and so
noted on the final map.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEI'ARTM ENT '
,, of HEALTH
CISIM II0~LL.IS #..11J.&
April 19, 1989
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
Attn: Kim Dirtmet
$0SS RAMSEY STREET
iANNING. CA
~,. # I~OADWAY
7240 MARGUERITA
RIVERSIDE. CA
S0S SOUTH BIJ~NA VISTA
CORONA. CA StTJ0
ell0 NOlTe4 STATE
IllelO
4s.2o8 OASIS STREET
INO;O. CA 12201
L&ll ILIIIOII
~01ES FI~IASER ~4~.
LAKE ELSINOre. CA. SZ$$0
I~&LII ePlilllll
$~'Ss TAHOU(TZ'M~CALLUSI
· ALM SINlINGS. CA S~6~
P~RRIS. CA
IS~0 LINDEN ST&EaT
RIVERSIDE, GA.
MISSION BLVD.
IRE1 TRACT MAP 23513t Bexnq a subdxvision of Parcels 1-3 of
P.H. 8755, on file in Book 43 of Parcel Haps, Pages 52 and
53 in the Office of the Riverside Recorder, also being a
portzon of the Temecula Rancho.
(ll Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has revzeved Tentative Hap
No. 23513 and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed according to
plans and speczfzcation as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prznts of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet. along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
1ocation of vaAves and fire hydrants~ pipe and
3oint specifications. and the size of the main
at the ~unction of the new system to the
existing system. The pAans shaAA comply in
aA1 respects with Div. 5. Part 1. Chapter ? of
the California Health and Safety Code. California
Administrative Code. TitAe 22. Chapter 16. and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California. when applicable.
protection or any other purpose", This certz~ca~on
shall be signed by a responsible official of the water
company. The plans must be submitted to th~_~O~_
~£y~¥or's Office to review at least two
to the r~guest for the recordation of the final
This Department has a statement from Rancho California Water
D, strict agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every
iot ~n the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory
financ,al arrangements are completed with the subdivider.
]t wil! be necessary for the f~nan¢ial arrangements to be
made prior to the recordation of the final map.
It will be necessary for the financial arr&nqements to be
made Dr,or to recordation of the final map.
This Department will permit domestic sewage disposal from
the individual lots in thzs subdivision as per a percol&tion
report submitted by To-Mac Engineering dated
November 30. 1980 as follows:
SO. FT./100 GAL.
I 60
2 40
3 40
4 40
5 90
6 90
7 60
6 60
9 60
10 110
11 110
NOTE: lEACH LINES TO BE INSTALLED IN TEST AREAS
disposal systems based on existing grouna
time the tests were conducted. If any grading, compaction,
cutting, etc. is accomplished and zs in excess of two feet,
additional sewaqe disposal information shall be required
prior to flnailng of the map.
The size of the septic tank and effluent dlsposa! area shall
be determined based upon the occupancy of each individual
lot. There shall be an unoccupied area on each lot where
sewage disposal, as required above, may be installed in
conformance with the current Uniform Plumbing Code. There
shall be an additional unoccupied area equal to 100% of the
above-required sewage disposal systems for sewage disposal
installation in case of failure. However, sewage disposal
systems are considered temporary and if sewage lines of a
sewer district become available, connection to the system
should be made at that time.
It will be necessary for financial proceedings to be
completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map.
.~~ncere~ ~
SM:tac
KENNETH L.. EDWAIRD~
~HIEF I'N~,INIrER
Illl MARKET ITREET
P.O. BOX IOSH
TIlEPHONE (714) 7e7-HOIB
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Re:
Attention: Regional Team No.
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the /~.rr;e~ ~'r~ /'~,f~!~ V~/If~cab~l:> Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the appl e r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The Dtstrtct's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
The attached comments apply.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
C ie~ Engineem
! OHN H. KASHUBA
(Senior Civil Engineer
DATE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
nRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN 3. NEWMAN
46-20~ Ouh ~ S~e 405
(&l~) 342-8886
12-4-89
4080 ~ Street, Suite 11L
P,J~, C~ 92501
(714) 787-66O6
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: DIANE KIRSKEY
TRACT 23513 - AMENDED
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule "B" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x&"x2{") located
one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 660 feet apart in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 330 feet from a hydrant.
Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company
with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system
is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Dept."
The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
Prior to the recordation of the final.map, the applicant/developer shall provide
alternate or secondary access as approved by the County Road Department.
HAZAI~US FIRE AREA
The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County
as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any
building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with
the special construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance
546.
A11 buildings shall be cons£rucced with fire retardant roofing material so
d~scribed in section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles
or shakes shall have a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the Fire
Department prior to installation.
Subject: TRACT 23513 Page 2
Driveways not to exceed 15Z grade.
HITIGATION
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit vith the
Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of
payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff. '
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Kurt Mantwell, Fire Safety Specialist
~ma
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention, Diane Kirksey
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE, Tract 23513, Amend #1
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions~
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall
obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-
site signage advertising the sale of the parcel map pursuant
to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348.
Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side yard
setback.
Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5'
side yard setback.
Very truly yours,
Becky
Land Use T. e6hnician
Administration (714) 682-8840 * (714) 787-2020
NOTE:
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
PLAN CORRECTING SHEET
Refer to Log Number for eny inquiry. This lpplication expires on
Date
JOB LOCATION
OWNER
by County Ordinance 457.
MAILING ADDRESS
~mm;m ...M~i Iw~ll,~'e k
Sheet No.
L~g No:
CHECKED BY
APPROVED BY
Department of Building and Safety
TO: Planning - File
FRDM:
RE:
Grading Section
7- c'r z- 13
Next LDC/EDC Date:
DATE:
INITIAL:
_~_Please make the following a condition of approval:
- _~_a. Prior to commencing any grading exceeding 5~ cubic yards,
the owner of that property shall obtain a grading permit
from the Department of Building and Safety
___b. Prior
to approval of this use/subdivision · grading
permit and approval of the rough grading shall be
obtained from the Building and Safety Department.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property
owner shall obtain · grading permit and approval to
construct from the Building and Safety Department.
___d. Constructing
of material
permit.
a road, ~here greater than 5~ cubic yards
is placed or moved, requires · grading
..... The Grad·n9 Section has no comment on this site
FOR FINAL GRADING PLAN - PLEASE PROVIDE APPLICABLE ~TION
FOR COUNTY GRADING FORMS: 284-86
284-21 -
284-120
284- ( A. C./Paving )
~'W T ¥
'March 13, 1990
INTER-DERARTMENTAI. I. ETTE R
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TO: Diana Kirksey - Team 1
FROM: Steven A. Kupferman - Engineering Geologist
RE: Tentative Tract Map 23513
Slope Stability Report No. 225
The following report has been reviewed relative to slope stability
at the subject site:
"Geotechnical Analysis of Slope Stability for Tentative Tract Map
No. 23513, ~15 Acre Site, Proposed Residential Development, Rancho
California, Riverside County, CA," by Leighton and Associates,
dated February 20, 1990.
This report determined that:
Planned fill and fill over cut slopes will be graded at 2:1
(horizontal to vertical), to a height 20 feet. Cut slopes are
planned at a 2:1 gradient to a maximum height of 15 feet.
2. Cut slopes will expose Pauba sandstone and/or alluvium
materials.
e
Proposed fill and fill over cut slopes will be stable against
deep-seated failure and surficial failure.
Cut slopes should be grossly stable provided they are fee of
adverse geologic conditions.
This report recommended that:
All cut slopes shall be observed by an engineering geologist
during site grading.
me
The General Earthwork and Grading Specifications (Appendix C
in the subject report) shall be incorporated into project
design and construction.
Cut and fill slopes shall be provided with appropriate surface
drainage features and landscaped with drought tolerant
vegetation as soon as possible after site grading.
Berms shall be provided at the top of fill Ilopes and brow
ditches shall be constructed at the top of cut slopes.
Diane Kirksey
March 13, 1990
Page -2-
Lot drainage shall be directed such that surface runoff on the
slope face is minimized.
The outer portion of fill slopes should either be overbuilt
by 2 feet and trimmed back to the finished slope or compacted
in ~ncrements of 5 feet by a sheeps foot roller as the fill
is placed and then track walked to achieve the final
configuration.
This report satisfies the General Plan requirement for a slope
stability report. The recommendations made in this report shall
be adhered to in the design and construction of this project.
SAK: bam
Ri -:::DiDE counc.
PL, llninG DEPaRQTIEnC
,1;: December 28, 1988
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety
Surveyor -Oave Ouda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Fire Protection
Flood Control District
Fish & Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
~eneral Telephone
Ca1 Tran ~8
Temecula Union S¢hool District
Elsinore Union H.S~ ~
Commissioner Bresson
U.C.R. Arch Unit
C.J. Crotinger
Community Plans
TRACT 23513 - (Tm-1) - E.A. 33455 - Abhat
Kumar Sawh- To-Mac Engineering - Rancho
California Area - First Supervisortel
District - North of Santiago Road and
West of Margarita Rd - R-R Zone - 14.37
Acres - REQUEST To Subdivide 14.37 Acres
into 11 Residential Parcels - Hod 11g -
A.P. 923-400-003,004,011
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for January 26, 1989. If it
clears, it will then go to public hearing.
Your commnts and recommendations are requested prior to January 26, 1989 in order that we
may include them in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
Alex Gann at 787-1363.
Planner
COt'g~NTS:
The Elsinore Union High School District facilities are overcrowded
and our educational programs seriously impacted by increasing
student population caused by new residential, commercial end
industrial .construction. Therefore, pursuant to California
Government Code Section 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, this district
levies a fee against all new development projects within its
boundaries.
~)ATrr= 1/4/89 SIGNATURE
4~0 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
~14) 787'6181
Dr. Larry B. Maw. Suo~rint~na~n+
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
Eastern unieipal ' ,er District
Do/k: F. Bo~n
Riverside Co. Planning Dept.
4080 Lemon St., 9th Floor
Riverside, Ca 92501
Th~ District is responding to your request for comments on the subject pro~ect
relative to water and/or sewer service. The items checked below appl~ to this
pro~ect review.
The subject pro~ect:
Zs not ~thin EMND's:
~,~ water service area
sewer service area
b_~~11 be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to
e served b2 E~ND:
Nater Service
An~ and a!1 necessar~ onsite and any offs~te water matns, regulators, pumptn9
plants, storage tanks, and appurtenant facilities and works. All mains and
facilities are to be reg~ona11~ s~zed. Part~cipatton in regtonal water
facilities, and fee payments must be met. ~ Nater mains wtll not be allowed
along lot lines/private lands. Fire flow requirements and backflow prevention
reouirements must be met.
Sewer Service '
Any and all necessary regionally sized onsite and offsite gravity sewers and
... appurtenant wor~s that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force
mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot
.lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers,
treatment, and.effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EMWD
regulations will be a)lowed.
EASTERN MUNICTPAL WATER DISTRICT ~"~-~
Planning Department
2045 S. SanJacinm Street ® Post Office Box R300 · SanJacinto, Calilornia 92~8~.1~00 · Telephone (.714) 92.5-7676
COU l:u.
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
3/2/88
CHANGE OF ZONE NO.
CONDmONAL USE
PERMIT NO.
PARCEL MAP NO.
PLOT PLAN NO.
23S13
APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
Afqq. ICiNT INFOlIMA11ON
I. AiX)#conri Nome:
2317 #i~ !l/vez I~oad ~1 ~:~on, Ca. 92020
Telephof~ No.: I 619 )
2. C)w~8 Nime: SAme
T~ No.: ( ) (8 Km- 6 I~m~
3. Relxe,enlatwe: ~O-NAC ~NG/#~ERXNG
MaiMgA4~f~t~: 41934 !~Ln Street, ?emegul&, Ca. 92390
714
T~ No.: ( ) (8 &m- S p.m.)
PROJECT INFORMATION
1. Purpose of Request (Clelcril~ project): (OrOi~e ~8 ref. no.)
Divide ~je~
~~ INF~A~N
!. AneoSO~8 PlroM
923-400-003,004,011
S~ti~ ~ad ~ot of ~rgazi~ ~d,
~cule ~ncho
7 Os 2w
3. ~ _ T~p
14.37 ~r~
L~t ~ ~ e~ ~1 ~ Is ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J. May M
Attired
T~ Broils PI~ No I~
Pine 12~, B4
~T~ ~ A~NT ~ AttAched ~ ~2-88
~IGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER(~) See Attached
4080 LEMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-36S7
(714) 787-6181
40-200 OAmS STREET,/KX)M 304
I~10. ~IF~NM 92201
(619) 342-8277
CASE N¢
E.A. NO.
STAFF USE ONLY '
ENWRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Please complete Parts I and II of this form and provide all of the additional materials requested in Part III. Failure to do so may
delay the review and process of your project. If you are unable to provide the information, or you need assistance, please leel
Iree to contact the Planning Department at (714) 787-6418.
PART I: General Information
1. What is the Total Acreage involved? 14 · 3? acres
2. Is there a previous application filed for the same site? YES ~x NO [3
If "Yes," provide Case Number. Also provide the Environmental Assessment Number, if known, and Environmental Impact
Report Number, if ·pplicable.
CASE NO. PM 8755
(Parcel Map, Zone Change, etc.)
F-A. NO. If Known). EIR NO. (if alN:)liceble)
3. Addilional comments you may wish to supply regarding your projecL (Attach an ·cioitional ~heef If necessary.)
PART II: Environmental Questionnaire
1. Is the IXOjeCt within an AlClUiSt-Priolo Special Studies Zone? YES
To determine if your project is located in a Special Studies Zc~e, contact the Public Information Section. or refer to the
Specisl Study Zones Maps available al the Public Inlormalion Counler of the Planning Department. If the project is within ·
zone, refer to Ordinance 547.1, or discuss the situation with the County Geologist.
If a fault hazard report is necessary, complete the investigation prior to submitting your N~l:~ioefion and Ixovide 6 copies of
the report with this form. If a waiver of the requirements is granted, submit · copy of the waiver with this form.
2. is the project located within a hazard management zone or licluifaction area as shown on ~ of the'Seismlc Safety Ele-
ment Technical Report"? YES [3 NO
To determine it your prolect is subject to the geologic hazards noted ·boy· you ~houid con~ult the "Seismic Safety & Safety
Element Technical Report' which is available at the Public Information Counter of the Planning DepartmeaL
I1 the answer to question #2 is *Yes," contact the approprista Geographic Planning Team Section to cliacuss aplwc~riste '
measure to minimize the hazard. Incorporate any mitigation measures into the project design I~ior to ~ubmitting the elN)lice-
lion or indicate in the space provided below the results of your discusions with the Planning Team.
3. If your project is in the desert area. is it within a blows·rid hezatd area? YES [3 NO It) N/A
The Planning Offices in I ndio and Riverside will provide you with information ooncemlng blow·and hazard& You may also
w~sh to contacl the U.S. Soil Conservation Service.
If your project is subject to blowsand hazards, submit · blows·rid control plan with the alN~llCatlon. (Also refer to Section 14.1
of Ordinance 460, if your project is a parcel map or subdivision).
4. Is water service available at the project site? YES 19x NO [3
If 'No," how far must the water line(s) be extended to provide service?
Number of feet or miles
Further explanalion:
5. Is sewer sewice ·vailable at the site? YES ID NO I~X
If "No,' how far must the water line(s) be extended to provide lervioe?
Number of feet or miles
6. Additional Comments:
Septic Tanks to be used.
PART III: Additional Material·
The following item& must be lubminecl with thi~ form:
1. AI Illit th~ (3) penorlmic photographs (cokx Ixinti) of the pre(ect lite, o~ In lehel photo of lite lit& ff color photographs
ate utilized, include · map K:leniifying:
· The Ix~itio~ from which each phologr~ph was taken
b The area of coverage oi each photograph
2. A Clear photocopy (Xerox or similar CO~y) of the al~ro~rlafe IXxlion of the U.S. GeoI;O~!! Suwey cluecharge map, delin-
eating the bounclarles of the ~oject site. Also note the title of the map.
I certify thai I have investsgelati the clueslions in Parts I end II end the an·were are true ~ ~ to the ~ of my
knowledge.
A~thony 3. TezJ. c:h ~ 21914
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the FLAIIRING COIIl~SSlOff to
consider the application(s) described below. The Planning Department has
tentatively found that the proposed project(s) wt11 have no significant
environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s).
The Planntng Cmmntsston wtll constder whether or not to adopt the negattve
declaration along wtth the proposed project at thts beartrig.
Place of Heartrig:
Date of Heartrig:
Board Rom, Z4th Floor, 4080Lmmn Street, Riverside, CA
¥E~IESDAY, FEBRUARY ZZ, IOK~O
The time of heartng ts Indicated wtth each application 1tsted below.
Any person may submit written cmments to the Planning Department before the
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption
of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be 11mtted to
ratstrig only those Issue) you or someone else raised at the publtc heartrig
described in this notlce, or in wrttten correspondence delivered to the
Planning Conmntsslon at, or prior to, the public hearing. The envtronmntal
finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public
information counter Monday through Friday from g:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m.
TRACT IMP NO. 23513, EA 33455 is an application for To-Mac Engineering for
property located in the Rancho California Area and First Supervtsortal
District and generally described as north of Santiago Rd and west of
Margarita Rd and which proposes to divide 14.37± acres into 11 lots
: TZHE OF HEARING: 9:30 I.B.
OWNER
923-400- ·
Sawh,Premawati Et A1
2317 Wind River Rd.
E1 Cajon, Ca. 92020
423-400-004 PI~
Sawh, Premawati Et A1
2317 Wind River Rd.
E1 Cajon, Ca. 92020
923-400-006
Terich, Phyll£s/Mike
6621 Canterwood Rd.
La Verne, Ca. 91750
Chaparral View Prop
1060 San Rafafl Ave.
Pasadena, Ca. 91105
923-400-007
923-400-008
Keup, Douglas/Connie
c/o Rancon Corp.
27720 Jefferson 4th Fl.
Temec~la, Ca. 92390
923-400-009
Terich, Phyllis/Mike
6621 Canterwood Rd.
La Verne, Ca. 91750
923-400-010
Darras, Sylvia/Jules
25202 Derby Cir.
Laguna hills, Ca. 92653
923-400-011
Sawh, Premawati Et A1
2317 Wind River Rd.
E1 Cajon, Ca. 92020
923-390-009
Pierce, Billie
P.O. Box 973
Temecula, Ca. 92390
923-390-013 01
GTR Investor~ s ~
30170 La Primavera
Temecula, Ca. 92390
923-400-003
$awh, Premawati
2317 Wind River Rd.
923-460- '7
Reinhard .. Elenore/Walter
12321 Emrys Ave.
Garden Grove, Ca. 92640
923-460-018
Altshuler, Robert Et A1
7173 E1 Poste
Buena Park, Ca. 90620
923-460-019
Machine Craft of San Diego Inc.
9187 Chesapeake Dr.
San Diego, Ca. 92123
923-460-020
Machine Craft of San Diego Inc.
9187 Chesapeake Dr.
San Diego, Ca. 92123
923-471-006,007,008
Rancho Calif. Der. Co.
P.O. Box 755
Temecula, Ca. 92390
923-330-001
Rancho Calif. Der. Co.
P.O. Box 755
Temecula, Ca. 92390
923-390-002
Hasbach, Ray/Lucille
3401 Quiet Cove
corona Del Man, Ca. 92625
923-400-012
Reh, Alfred/Rose
4663 Madera Dr.
La Verne, Ca. 91750
923-460-009
Visser, Jules/I1se
260 Camino De1 Sol
South Pasadena, Ca. 9f030
ENGINEER
TO-MAC ENGINEERING
41934 Main Street
Temecula, Ca. 92390
RiVER:biDE counct,
-PLAnninG DEPARClTIEnC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: STANDARD EVALUATION
NAME OF PERSON(s) PIlEPAllING E.A.:
I.
PRGJE~ INFORMATION
DESCRIPTION ~ (,,;.~.c~11~ minimum Io4 ILte Incl u~# Is lll~)lic:lble):
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES
C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s):
,
D. EXISTING ZONING:
E. PROPOSED ZC~NtNG:
F. BTP. EET REFERENCES:
IS THE PROPOSN. IN CC)NI:ORMN~E?
IS THE PROPOSN. IN CONFORIdNqCE?
SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION C~ AI'I'ACH A LEGAL. DESCRIPTION:
IL ~QIIqI~H~]qI~VE GENERAL PLAN OPEN BPACE AND CONSERVATION DE81GNATIOH
I III.
III.ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND IIIESOURCE$ A88EI~MENT
A. kK~ ~M n~um ~1M r~p~d ~nd uM i~ detenn~h~d fn)m ~M dMcdpt~ni M ~und.in C~4~ ~ ~n F~
0tUGIJ I'/ll~'/I Normid-High Pink NommJ-l. ow Iqiik
I. iVi0li w~ i WI (Y) or nO ~) Whl~W iny Invk~mln~ huird ind/or fliou~l ilum my dOfd~jdy i~lc~ or M i~
bylhlprolx~J. Allil&r~nCldf~urtll~ecQ~h~d k~ffm ~ Oenl~P~f~ ForlnY~lUlffld~dyt$~lw~de
ild~rl~ tI dill lOUtOil, IOI r~il I Oc)filUIlld. firidinOl M I1~ &rbcI Ifiy II~ltio~ Illill,tel ufid~ 84cUofi V. Adlo, where tficli~lttd.
~ the mpprol)dBt~ ~ l ~ult~bil~ m nc~4 ~cc~tsbllity ming(s). (Gee clef~dUcm8 st
HA~D8
Alqulst-Prtolo Specd~J Studies or County ~utt
H~ Zones (FJO. Vl.1)
NA PS u R (fit VI.3)
Ltcwef~ton Potenti~J Zone (riO. V1.1)
~ 8 PS u R (Fig VL4)
Gfouncl~MnO ~ (FJo Vi.1)
N~ $ PS u R ~. vl.s)
~c)pes ~Jv. Co. 8OO Sc~
L~nc~e R~k Zone (RW. Co. O00 S~11e
Se~m~ MBps or ~
_NA $ P$ U R
~ HIzlKI (On-lJtl Inll:lcUon)
7~_ Expahiiv~ 8MS (U~J~
IFS. NA.6)
C~Uon Sef~ ~ Surveys)
F. rolion G.I~.D.A,. 8,oil CCi~IMvBUon
kvk~ Soil Survlys)
WffIcI EIIoik)n & Blow141nd (FiG V1.1,
Oral. 460, 84C 14.2 i Ord. 484)
~ InundltJon Am (1~. V1.7)
rk~Cd~4B~n8 (Fig. VI.7)
u n (fig. VI.8)
12./'/ AirpOll ~ (FJo. i.18.S, 11.18.11
~. ~ HIzB~k)u8 Mi~d~$ Bnd W~tes
~3.
~t___ C)~er
RESOURCE8
D~flnltlonl for Land U.e 8ultlblllty and Noise AooeptlblHty RitinOI
U - O. nedy un.unnU. n - Rnuc~ A - GWNNdyAompmb~
I. r, ud6MMy c. O - Lind UnDKoumpd
LAND USE DETERMINATION
&
For all I:)K)jects, inidr, lte with · yes (Y) or no (N) whether at~y public McilitiN Ind/or iervicwl illuit may significantly arklet
Of bo affected by the pn:)lx:)~al. All felerer~KI ~0ures ~re conteir~d in the P..,ogni~lM~sive G4nofll Pta~. For any i.~ue
marked yes (Y). write clam soure#. a4~ corw~ltecl. firelings of tacL and mitigation mensums under Section V.
IRJBL.IC FACIL. mE$ AND SERVICES
k. V Existing. Planned & fling:rid Roeds)
4~ 8,ewer (~alnGy IJWrl) 13...,~_
EquMtrin Trds (Ir~. IV. le - IV.24/
Riv. C4). CO0 &Gale Fqul I bin TrlJl
UUM~ (F~. nf26 - IV~6)
IAxam~ (Fig, IV.l? - IV.18)
Helllh ~11~tCli (Fio. IV.l? ,, IV.18)
ILlU- Ll&10 & IV2?-
C]ty 81:d~fe Of kl~l~mr c !
keM', NnMw k ~ !M M)Ed~ imidm IM)lyine k) the r..~x~a', and (x~llt~
LAND USE DrrLrRMIN~TiON (Wiled)
D. I/ii or pitt o(~l W IAi il in 'M not DMionlled i8 C)pen Spl~ ~d i W ~ i ~~ ~, ~e
?~'lAi~ni 1, 2, ~, e Ind 7. C&iINMete ~ltJonl 4, 6, 6 IM 7 II # il in · COnVl~Jnlty Pin.
8. I D.1 ~ M)m D2, will Ihe diflwinM be mk)lwd It Ihe d~vl/~;.,~wnl 1410s? Expllin:
S. il ~he propoled project conillten! wi~ ~e polk;M I~d desionitic~ of the Community Pin?
# no~ explh~:
II ~e pf~palll complt~)le w#h exltk~g Ind r)K. paaed ~TounclinO imcl
no(, expik~:
I. li It r,,~. ~ w* oliilld dh # dillOrlOn(i)? I no~ iiplin:
Ii.7o Nm IIJi?) 4
¥. INFOIIIMATION SOURCES. FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MF.,AJUIIIIIE$
& ADDITIONN. INFORMA,TION REOUIRED BEFORE EI'~IRONMENTAI. ASSESSMENT ~ BE COMPLETED:
DATE
NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED
I~TE ADEOUACY
INFORMATION I~"T!~IMI~'n0N
RECEIVED IYE$,IqODATE~
r.M elch Iliue mirkeri yes (Y) undeT SecUc~l III.B and N.B, identify 1he Section Ind il~ue number end do the
k)#owing, in the formit II Ihown below:
1. I~t ~11 mddition~l relevant cl~t~ ~urc~$, Inr. l~ling igenci.t c~ne~tttecl.
finclings of fact regarding environmental conc4ms.
~Wl ~f~t~ M ~uir~ MfMe ~ ~r~l ~t ~ M ~t~, refer to
~u~mm~t~n ~
l~i~l I~ i~ ~ ~ ~plte ~il ~, ~k ~ ~x it ~ ~d ~ t~ ~ and a~ch
nl;1111~ i~.
IEc'rlON/
B~LIE NO.
~OURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FAC~I', MITIGATION MEASUI4ES:
BIFORMATION ~OURCE$, FINDING~ OF FACT AND MITIGATION MF..A~URE$ (~ontlnued)
~OURCE$, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
]~] ~ ~ d [lot ~ I Ilonllcilnt I411C:l On the I'~k,,rdlr, e~t IJV:l 8 ~ Dec:ifmlion my be
.ou~l have · .10nlacant ~ on the .~d.,r..~int. hc/.Kir. there v41 not b, a SiOnlib:ant
may hmv~ a dgnffic~nl .ffec~ .n the ~l,c,r..~tn! and an En~c~..~t-I Impact
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ~
HTG:
OEPT:
TITLE:
P. ECOMMEND/~T Z ON:
OOPl~I~ POI~OIIABE CITY
CITY HGR ~./j
Authorize the City Manager to purchase a
Kodak 235AF copier through the Purchasing
Department of the County of Riverside.
B~CKQROUNDI Staff has determined that the purchase of
a copier is the desired economical and logical alternative.
Another alternative is to purchase an offset duplicator and
various accessory items (collator, plate maker, etc.) and create
a reprographics shop. However, the City's volume and type of work
does not support the creation of a reprographics shop. It is not
economical to establish a reprographics shop for duplicating
multiple copies of multiple originals. A reprographics shop is
idea1 when the majority of the work to be performed is duplicating
multiple copies of a few originals. We average over 2S0 original
agenda documents and produce 25 oop~es of the agenda. A
reprographics shop would be the economical alternative if the
numbers were reversed= 25 original agenda documents and produce
250 aopies of the agenda. Therefore, for the volume and the
majority of the work we duplicate, a copier is the most logical
and economical choice.
Staff has been evaluating copiers at City
Hall since January 1990. Since that time, we have had loner
machines, at no cost to the City, for evaluation trials. We have
evaluated copiers from Xerox (two machines), Kodak (one machine),
and Canon (one machine). These trials evaluated the coplet's
reliability, quality, features, and price. The Kodak Ektaprint
235AF has been chosen by staff. The Cities of Lake Elsinore and
Moreno Valley have also chosen the Kodak 235AF and have experience
tremendous service and equipment reliability.
The County of Riverside has a contract
with Kodak that reduces the list price of the copier from $73,500
to $44,625. After July 1, 1990, the price for the machine will
increase to $46,856. An equipment maintenance agreement is
required at a cost of $465.00 per month and $0.0052 per copy. The
copier price includes delivery, installation, training, parts,
labor, image loop and drum changes, a 90 day warranty free service
period, and a seven year service availability with service
exchange policy.
FZBC~L IMPACT:
$48,101.39 is available in Fiscal Year
1990's budget for Nondepartmental -
Capital Outlay - Office Equipment.
None.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: tt
D£PT: ~ ~.~ ~,
TITLE:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21383
SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME
DEPT "D~=~-
CITY ATTY
CITY I~R ~
R;_,~,,...~.e ndation
That the City Council SET FOR HEARING the second extension of time request
for Tentative Parcel Map No. 21383 on July 24, 1990.
Project Information
Request Filed:
Case No.:
Applicant:
Representative:
Proposal:
Location:
Zoning:
Surrounding Zoning:
Surrounding
Land Uses:
Project
Statistics:
County Planning, February 23, 1990
Tentative Parcel Map No. 21383, second application for
a one year time extension.
Rancho Core Associates No. 1
NBS/Lowry
Second extension of time request for Tentative Parcel
Map No. 21383, 130 industrial lot subdivision on 16q
acres.
Northwest corner of the intersection of Winchester and
Diaz Roads.
M-SC
North:
South:
East:
West:
M-SC "'
M-SC
R-R, M-SC
R-A-20
North: Vacant
South: Industrial Park
East: Murrieta Creek
West: Hillside/Vacant
Tentative Parcel Map for 130 industrial lots on 164
acres. The minimum proposed lot size is one { 1 ) gross
acre.
Prolear Backqround
This project was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on March 24, 1987. The first extension of time was applied for on
March 16, 1989 and was approved on October 2q, 1989.
The second extension of time was applied for at the Riverside County Planning
Department on February 23, 1990. The case was then transferred to the City of
Temecula with a RECEIVE and FILE recommendation.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21383
PAGE 2
Area Sattincl
Approximately one half of the site lies in the Murrieta Creek Flood Plain area.
The other half ascends the valley floor and extends into the foothills of the Santa
Rosa Plateau. The site is currently vacant. To the south is an existing
Industrial park. Easterly of the site is the Murrieta Creek Channel, which is
zoned R-R. Northerly of the project is vacant area zoned M-SC. To the west of
the proposed industrial site is hillside area zoned R-A, with 20 acre minimum lot
sizes.
Staff Concerns
Staff recommends that the project be set for public hearing because of concerns
which include the following issues:
The Intensity of the proposed grading is severe and staff requests
policy direction. Approximately 3,400,000 cubic yards of earth on
16~ acres are proposed to be moved.
Possible land use conflict with the future General Plan in terms of
appropriate development in this relatively large, undisturbed open
area.
Staff Recommendation
That the City Council SET FOR HEARING the second extension of time request
for Tentative Parcel Map No. 21383 on July 24, 1990.
SOL
AU~
~ d ~c.T ~
I i LAND USE
'
RiVERSiDE counc .
PLAnnin DEP&RC Eni
Mr. Ross Geller
Willdan Associates
155 Hospitality Lane, Suite 110
San Bernardino, CA 92408
RE:
Transfer of Case File for Project Within the City of Temecula
(Case Number)
Dear Mr. Geller:
The above referenced case{s} is being forwarded to you for any additional
processing that may be required. The subject case{s) was considered at a
public hearing and is being forwarded to the City Council of Temecula for
action, as noted below.
/--'-7 Approved by the Planning Director and being forwarded to the City
Council to RECEIVE AND FILE the Planning Director's action.
Approved by the Planning Con~ission and being forwarded to the City
Council to RECEIVE AND FILE the Planning Commission's action.
/ /
Approved by the Planning Con~nission and being forwarded to the City
Council for a public hearing.
With the case file being transmitted to you, as staff for the City of Temecula,
the County Planning Department will not be taking further action on the
subject c~se(s).
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office at 275-3208.
Very truly yours,
R]VERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Joseph A. Richards, Planning Director
Richard~acHott, q~rincipal Planner
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE
BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 9220
(619) 342-827
PLANNING COMMISS! OtJ' 3-29-90
Agenda Item No. : 3-1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
BOARD ROOM - 14TH FLOOR - 4080 LEMON STREET ~ RIVERSIDE
PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR STAFF REPORT
NOTE:
The following will be presented to the Planning Commission as
consent calendar items. Unless specifically requested by the
applicant at the time cf consideration, these items ma~ not be
discussed and are subject to approval by the Commission under a
single motion.
CEQA: The following tract have conformed to the require~,:e:;t.= of
the C~lifc,-nia Envlronn',ental Cua~ity Act of 197C. It has bee'-:
determined that the indi¥idua! ma~. will not have a sigr,'Ficant
effect upon the environment.
GE;..'ER~L PLAN: Unless otherwise noted, the following tracts
been determined to be consistent with the general plan a-:~ its
· l ement s.
Om~INA!JCE NO. 653' The . ~ . ..-
c_,r,.itions of apDrc.'val for the
ma~. will be - , ~ ~ to -
a,.,ea~e. reflect tt',e implementat'ion of Crd
(Stephe,~ Kang~
n -too R~t M~tig~' .
~,e conditions wi,! be ar.e~_. as follows:
Tract 21283,
add Cond'=tior. No. 20.
RECOMHENDATIO)JS- The applicant of the following map has
an e.,.tension o~ time to allow for recordation of a final
Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval.
TRACT NO. 21383 - NBS Lowry - Temecula Area - First Superviscera~
District - 130 Lots - 164 Acres - Southwest of Dia~ Road and we~
of Rancho California - Schedule E - M-SC Zone - EXTENSI~H OF TIt~E
THROUGH MARCH 24, 1991 - Second Extension.
Zoning Area: Te~cula
Supervtsorial District:
E.A. Number: 30363
Re9tonal Team No:
First
INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP NO. 2]383 Ar~U.M3
Planning Con~nisston: 1-21-B7
Agenda Item: No. g
Engineer:
Type of Request:
4. Location:
~ 5. Existing Zoning:
~E~ ~. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. Area Characteristics:
g. Comprehensive General Plan
Designation:
JO. Land Division Data:
Agency Recommendations:
]2. Letters:
]3. Sphere of Influence:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Rancho Core Associates No. ]
N.B.S. Lowry
To divide ]64.07 acres into 130 lots
Southwesterly of Ot az Road
southeasterly of Cherry Street
M-SC
M-SC, R-A-20, and R-R
Flat open area sloping
the west
Area transitioning to
activities
and
upwards towards
industrial Dark
Land Use: Category II Industrial
Total Acreage: ]64.07
Total Lots: 130
Proposed P. in. Lot Size: 1/a¢ gross
Road: 3-24-87
Health: S-15-86 & ]-21-86
Flood: $-21-86
Fire: 5-]5-86
Other: Butldtng& Safety: g-4-86
Opposing/Supporting: None as of
wrt ting
Not within a City Sphere
this
ANALYSIS:
Project Description:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 21383 Amended No. 3 is an application to divide ]64.D7
acres tnto ]30 lots. The mtntmum lot size proposed ts ] acre gross. The
proposed project is a schedule 'E' parcel map. The project site is located
Southeasterly of Diaz Road and southeasterly of Cherry Street.
At present, the subject property is vacant and is zoned N-SC. Surrounding
I~'operttes are ~oned M-SC, R.A-20, and R-R. The general characteristics of the
area are vacant lots transittoning to Industrial I)lrks end service cMnmerctal
uses.
INDUSTRIAL PARCEL NAP NO. 21383 ~nd. t:3
Staff Report
Page 2
ENVIIK)IOEfITAL ~IIAL¥SIS:
Environmental Assessment No. 30363 Indicates
cancer. ns Impact the subject s itc: L icluefact ion:
resources.
the follow Ing
Eros ion: and
any Ironment al
Archaeolog ic al
The Department of Build ing end Safety's letter dated g-4-86 provides ~ecluate
mitigation for liquefaction concerns. Erosion concerns can be mir igatecl
through project des ign and proper grading techniclues. Archaeological Report,
PO 1:125 #as prepared for the project s Itc, and the report showed no f fncls anc~
racomends no eit igat ion reclu tramants.
PROJECT r.d)NSISTENC¥/C~ATIBILI1~r:
The subject property lies within the Southwest Land Use Planning Area. The
site also lies within the Mr. Palomar Observatory Policy Area.
Review of the Open Space & Conservation Map of the Comprehensive General Plan
sho~s the site as Areas Not Des ignored as Open Space. The Land Use Element of
the Comprehensive General Plan designated the site Category ]I land uses. A
full range Of public services and facilities are available to the subject
property.
The proposed 130 lots Industrial/commercial subdivision is a logical extension
of the existing and proposed industrial pattern in the area. The proposed
project is compatible with the industrial park located directly southeast of
the project and the tentat ively approved schedule 'E" parcel map located to the
SOuth of the project. Industrial Parcel Map No. 21382 was sub~ittecl
concurrently with this project, and was approved by the Planning Commission on
December 3, 1986. Parcel Map 21382 is proposing the sane type of project with
the sane proposed lot s ize.
Staff recon~ends approval of Tent at ave Parcel Map No. 21383, Amd. 13 in that
the proposal Is consistent with the General Plan, campat Ible with the
development, and conforms to the requirements of Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460.
FI#BIIIGS:
The applicant proposes to divide :164.07 acres Into :130 lots with a minimu~
lot Size of I acre gross.
The subject site Is current17 vacant and Is zoned )~-SC.
3. Surrounding properties consist of vacant lots, a Industrial park, proposed
Industrial subdivision, approved Industrial subdivisions and the ~rrieta
Creek Bed; and are zoned H-SO, and R-A-Z0, and R-R.
.... 4. The Comprehensive General Plan calls for Categor~ 11 land use.
INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP NO. 2]383 Amd. ~3
Staff Report
Page 3
S. The site Is subject to 11quefact ion, and eros ion.
]. The proposed pro~tect is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan.
The proposed pro.tect is compatible with existing and proposed surrounding
land use.
3. The proposed project is in conformance with Ordinance No. 348 and 460.
4. All environmental concerns can be adequately mitigated.
RE(:OII~E)I~AT ION S
AIXIPT!OM of a gegat lye Oeclarmt ion for Environmental Assessment No. 30363,
based on the conclusion that the proposed project will not have a Significant
effect on the environment; and,
/LmPROVAL of Tent at lye Parcel Map 21383, Amended t~o. 3 subject to the cone it ions
Of approval, and based on the findings and conclusions incorporateU in the
staff report.
DM:bc
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I~I~L PMC~L N)? NO. Z1~83 MID. ~3 Ikte: ~ 24, 1!
~pf~s: ~ 24, 1~
~~ ~ITI~S
1. T~e ~tl~e subdivision shall c~ply ~lt~ t~ State of ~llfoc~la
~Mtvtston ~p ~t and to all ~e requtr~nts of Riverside ~unty
Ordinance 460, ~dule E, unless mdtft~ by the conditions 11sted.~low.
~ Z. This ~ndtttonally app~v~ tentative mp wtll expt~ tm ~r's after the
'~. ~ - ~
~a of Supervisors mppmred da~, unless exte~ed as provided by
~l~nce 460.
3. The ftna~ mp shall ~ p~epared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the ~t~e~nts of the State of California Subdivision ~p ~e and
Riverside ~unty Ordinance 460.
4. The su~tvtder shall submtt one copy of a solls report to the SuPve~'s
~ftce and tm copies ~ the ~pa~nt of ~l]dtng and ~fety. The
re~rt shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the
stte.
If any grading ts proposed, the subdivider shall submlt one prtnt of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of"'Butldtng and Safety. The
plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval.
e
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Deparbnent of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way. If grading is proposed on slopes of 10% or greater,
and environmental assessment approval will be required from the Planning
Department prior to an acceptance of the plans by the Building Department.
One mylar copy of the approved grading plan shall be submitted to the
Department of Building and Safety for transmittal to the Road Department.
7. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final top.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement reconmendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 3-24-87 ,
a copy of which is attached.
9. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided fro~ the tract
amp boundary to a County rainrained road. ...
IIM)OSTRIAL PARC~ NAP RO. 21383 Amd. ~3
Cond! tJons of Approval
Page ~
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
conttnue tn force unttl .the governing body accepts of abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from al1 encumbrances as approved
by the Road Commissioner. Street names sha]l be subject to approval of
the Road Co,t, tsstoner.
El semen ts,
utilities,
withtn the
conveyances
Surveyor.
when requtred for roadway slopes, dratnage factlites,
etc., shall be sho~n on the ftnal mp tf they are located
land dtvtston boundary. A1] offers of dedication and
shal] be submitted and recorded as dtrected by the County
Water and sewerage dtsposal facilities shall be 1natalled tn accordance
wtth provisions set forth tn the Rtve~ide County Health Depart~nt's
letter dated 5-15-86 & 1-21-86, a copy of whtch ts attahced.
The subdivider shall comply wtth the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Rtvertsde County Control Dtstrtct's letter dated 5-21-86,
a copy of ~htch ts attached. If the land dtvtston 11es within an adopted
flood control dratnage area pursuant to Sectton 10.25 of Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the constroctton of area drainage facilities shall be
collected by the Road Comtsstoner.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvements recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 5-15-86, a copy of
which is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
16. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
17.
a. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section
3.8(; of Ordinance 460.
b. Lots created by thts subdivision shall be tn conformance with the
development standards of the #-SC zone.
c. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Butldln9 and Safety.
Prtor to RECORDATION of the ftnal map the following conditions shall be
satisfied.
INDUSTRIAL PMC[I. NAP NO. 21383 Md. f3
Coalitions of Approval
hge 3
Prior to recordation of the final map the applicant shall su~tt written
clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all
pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from
the following agenctes have been met.
County Ftre Department
County Flood Control
County Health Deparb~ent
County Planning Deparb~ent
The land-divider shall be responsible for mtntenance and upkeep of all
slopes, untt1 such ttme as those operations are the responsibilities of
other Perttes as approved by the Planntng Dtrector
PP4oP 4o Pe(oPda~.4on 0¢ the f4na~ mp the subd4v4deP sha3~ p~vade a
~ve W. m(, e so~ o~ ~4ek 4s e~eeked, Deleted ~r Planntng
~tsston Januar~ Z]. 1987.
PpaoF (e peao~dfi4om of ~he f4ma~ mop ~he subd~vadeF sha~ preyads a
wF$~(ee samaemeM( ~m ~he 9epa~lJ, eM( o~ 8ua~da~g and $a~e~y &hfi ~he
peee,,mendii4eMs dried g-4-86 have been me, a espy of whaeh 4s a&~ashed,
Deleted per Planntng Commission January 21, 1987.
e. Street 1tghts shall be provided wtthtn the subdivision tn accordance
wtth the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following:
Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plants
with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of
the proposed street light layout first from the Road Depar~ent's
traffic engineer and then frown the appropriate utility purveyor.
Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road
Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also ftle an
application with LAFCO for the formation of a street 1tghttng
district, or annexation to a existing 1tghttng district, unless
the site is within an existing lighting district.
o
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street lighting application from
LAFCO, unless the site is within an existing 1tghttng district.
g. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints
Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to
delineate identified envtrorlnental concerns and shall be pemanently
ftled with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall
be transmitted to the Planntng Department for review and approval. The
approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map
to the Planntng Department and the Department of Butldtng and Safety.
INDUSTRIAL PARCEL HAP IlO. 21383 Amd. #3
CoedttJons of Approve1
Page 4
18.
he
de
The Collowing note shall be placed on the Envtromental Constraints
Sheet: 'A Geologtc Report was prepared for this property by Letghton
end Associates on June 23, 1986, end ts on ftle at the Riverside County
Plenntng Department. Spectftc 1terns of concern tn the report are as
follows: Liquefaction.'
The following note shall be placed on the Envtromental Constraint
Sheet: 'County Archaeological Report No. 1125 ~as prepared for this
property end ts on ftle at the Riverside County Planntng Department.
Prtor to the Issuance of MADING PERMITS the follo~ng conditions shall be
satisfied:
If the project ts to be phased, prior to the approval of grading
permtts, an overall conceptual gradtng plan shall be submitted Co the
P]anntng Dtrector for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline
for subsequent detatled grading plans for Individual phases of
development and shall tnclude the following:
Techniques which will be uttltzed to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of
January through March.
3. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
4. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent
grade.
Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Htllslde Development
Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combination there
of, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be rodtried by an
appropriate combination of a special terracing (benchtrig) plan,
tncreese slope retto (t.e., 3:1) retaining m11s, end/or slope planttrig
combined wtth irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen
percent grade.
All cut slopes located adjacent to undergraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded
incorporating the following grading techniques:
1. The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terrain.
~JSTRIAL PA~C~. MAP NO. 21383, Amd.
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
~3
2. Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proporotion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and s~aHility penmir such rounding.
19. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied.
a. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 460.
DM:bc
12/23/86
20.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permits, the applicant shall comply
with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee
set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of
the fee required by Ordinance ~1o. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee
required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as /mplemented by County
ordinance or resolution. (A~ded per Planning Cc,,,,c[ssion on 3-29-90).
/bc
3/12/90
I{I V F, IL~ I I )F. (, ;( )uNrY
FI I{F, DF.I'^I{'IM F. NI'
IN COOPERAlION Wl ! H 111E
CALIFORNIA DEPARIMEN I OF FORESlaY
RAY I IF. BEARD
FIEF. CIlIF. F
05-;15-86
210 WF.S I SAN I^t'IN I I} AVI!NU
I'I:IIP, I,~, ('Al.I! ()I~,NI^ ~! }70
I'EI.EI'I It)Nl:: (714l 65 ?.J I RJ
TO '.
PLANNING DEPARTNENT
Attm Team II
Re ~
21383 - Amandment~3
gtth respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department racomcods the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
atandards=
CO!~ERCIAL FlEE PROTECTION
The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of ~000 GPH
and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 2000 GPH for
2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure.
Approved super fire hydrants, (6"x&"x2J"x2J") shall be located at each street
intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with
no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one (1) copy of the water system plans
to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types,
location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flov requirements.
Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local
water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design
of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by
the Riverside County Fire Department."
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering section.
NICRAEL E. GRAY
Planning Officer
cdt
Planning Department
PARCEL N~P NO. 21383
-2-
January 21, 1986
This Department has a statement from the Rancho California I~Yater District agreeing
to allow the sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the district. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approred
by the district, the County Surveyor and the Health Deparment. Permanent prints
of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with
the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal
pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint
specifications, and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system
to the existing system. I single plat indicating location of sewer lines and
· mter lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans
shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the
following certification: "! certify that the design of the sewer system in
Parcel [4ap No. 21383 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the
Rancho California l~ater District and that the waste disposal system is adequate
at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract."
The plans must be submitted to the Count), Surveyor's Office to review at least
two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map.
It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the
recordation of the final map.
It will be necessary. for the annexation proceedings to be completely finalized
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Sincerely,
H. Ralph Luchs, R.S.
Administrative Superrisor
~.L:cg
CUNTY OF RIVERSIDE- DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH
Jammr)- 21, 1986
Riverside County Planning Department - Team 2
4080 Lemon St.
Riverside, CA 92501
JAN 2 ? 1986
RIVERs~up.. ~UUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: PARCEL I~v NO. 21383; Parcel 4, l~.i 4646, PM 6/75, Riverside County Records.
(152 Parcels)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 21383 and reco~ends
that:
A ~ter system shall be installed according to plans and svecifications
as approved by the water cempany and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate,
~Sth a minimum scale not less than one inch eauals 200 feet, along ~cith
the original drawing, to the Count)' Surveyor. The prints shall sho~c the
internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pive and
joint sgecifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the ne~,'
system to the existing system. The plans shall couply in all respects
with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code,
California Administrative, Title 22, Cha~ter 16, and General Order Xo. 105
of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when a~licable.
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and ~ater coupan)' ~,'ith
the following certification: "I certify that the design of the ~,'ater
system in Parcel Map No. 21585 is in accordance with the water system
expansion plans of the Rancho California ~ater District and that the
~ater service, storage and distribution system ~ill be adequate to ~rovide
vater service to such tract. This certification does.not constitute a
guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at an)' specific auantities,
flows or pressures for fire protection or an)' other pumose." This
certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water con-an)'.
The ~lans~ust be submitted to thf_County ~rveyor's Office to review' at
~ast t~o weeks ~rior to the request for the recordation of the fina]-~-~?.
This Department has a statement from the Rancho California ~:ater District a~reeifig
to serve domestic water to each and every. parcel on demand providin~ satisfactorT
financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessa~'
for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final ma~.
LoRoy D. Smoot
-IOAO COMMISSJONII · COUNTY $UitVlVOt
OFFICE OF ROAD COMmiSSIONER 6 COLWTY $L'RVEYOR
Hatch 24. 1987
~anaary'~tT-t98~
eo.e,,/o~r-Igr-l~J~e
Riverside County Planntng Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92S0!
Ladies and Gentle~en:
Re: Parcel Map 21383 - Amend #3
Schedule E - Team 2
As Amended at Planninq Commission 1-21-$7
'As Amended at Board 3-24-R7
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvements and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461).
It iS understood that the tentative map correctly shows all existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their
ontssion may require the map to be resubmitted for :.rther consideration. These
Ordinances and the following conditions are essenti~' parts and a requirement
occurring in O))E is as binding as though occurring '~ all. They are intenceo :o
be complenentary and to describe the conditions for ~ complete design of the
inprovenent. All questions regarding the true mea.'ing of the conoitions shall
be referred to the Road Comnissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream pro~erties fr:~ carafes
caused by alteration of the ~rainaGe patterns, i.e., c:rcentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall ~e ~Dvi:eo :y
C~nstructing adequate drainage facilities inc!~cit~ enlar~i~
e(istin~ facilities or by securing a ordinate easement :r :y
both. ~ll drainage easenents snall be shogun on t~e final ~a~
and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allo,ea". The
protection shall be as approved by the ~oaa ~epart~ent.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the
Road Co~nissioner permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance ~4o. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Parcel Map 21383 - Amend #3
Schedule E - Team 2
-N~vcqMi!~P-]~r-~ January 21, 1987
Page Z
As Amended At Planning Commission '2-21-87
As Amended at Board 3-24-87
®
*4.
**7.
Be
11.
~Jor dratnage ts involved on thts landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
Diaz Road & Winchester Road shall be improved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 101, ~G~f~
76'/100').
"A" Street shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 102, (32'/44').
Streets "B", "C", "E", "F" and "G" shall be improved within the
dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard I(o. 111,
Section A. (56'/78').
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk)
or as approved by the Road Commissioner.
Primary and secondary access roads to the nearest paved road
maintained by the County shall be constructed within the public
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section
B, (32'/60') at a grade and alignment el approved by the ~oaU
Commissioner. This is necessary for c'~culation purposes.
Prior tO the recordation of the final -at, the developer small
Ueoosit wit~ t~e ~iverside County Road ~epartnent, a cash su~ of
S1,750.00 ~er gross acre as ~itigation for traffic si§nal i~pacts.
Should the developer choose to defer the ti~e of payment, ne ~ay
enter into a ~.;ritten agreement ~ith the Cc~nty Ueferrin~ sai~
~ay~ent to the ti~e of issuance of a buil:i~ ~er~it.
i-:rovenent plans shall be based upon a centerline ;ro~ile
,(tending a mini~u~ of 3C0 feet beyond t~e ;r~ject :euncaries
a Grade and alignment as approved by the Riversice County
Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not i~ply
acceptance for maintenance by County.
Electrical an~ c~mmunications trenches small be provi:eo in
accordance wit~ Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
*Deleted at Planning Co~mission 1-21-87
**As Amended at Board 3-24-R7
Parcel ~p 21383 - Amend f~
Schedule E - Team 2
Ne~embe~9~-~986 ,JemJer~-2-~-.1.O~March 24, 1987
Page 3 .
As Amendeo At Planntng Commission 1-21-87
As AMnded At Board 3-24-87
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
lB.
21.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog sea1) shall be applled not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be applted at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard.
Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 3g and g4 of the
State Standard Specifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall be
constructed throughout the landdivision.
Corner cutbacks in conromance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Dia~ Road and so noted on the
final map with the exception of one 40' opening between parcels
2! and 22 and one 40' opening between parcels 23 and 24.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall provide erosion control, sight distance and slope easements
as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall provide utility "earance from Rancho Calif.
Water District ~rior to the recorUatic- ~f the final ~ap.
The minimum centerline radii shall be :]0' or as approved by the
Road ~epar~rent.
Street trees shall be planted in confor-area ,itn t~e :r~visions
of ~rticle l]a of Ordinance 460.53 ~nd their locationlsl $~all :e
Shown on street improvement plans.
:ll ~r~veways small confo~ to t~e applicable qivers~-o
Standards and small be ShOwn on the street improvement Glans.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90° ..~itn a minimum
feet of tangent beyond the flow line as apDrovea by the Road
Commissioner.
Parcel Map 21383 - Amend #3
Schedule E - Team 2
--.. No~embe~-~t;-)t86 Jee~Je~,,j~1-,--~98~ March 24, 1987
Page 4
As Amended At P1enntng Co~lnisslon 1-21-87
A~ Amended at Board 3-24-87
22. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall
be coordinated with PH 19582, PH 210Z9, PH 21382, MB 122/42-43.
23.
Prtor to the recordation of the ftnal map, the significant issues
Involving fee contributions for the Winchester Road Bridge
crosstng the t~rrteta Creek along with signal locations at the
intersection of Rancho California Road end Front Street shall be
resolved.
24. Lot access shall be restricted on Winchester Road and Street "A"
for a distance of 200' measured from the centerline of Diaz Road
and so noted on the final map.
GH:lh
Very truly yours,
Gus Hughes
Road Division Engineer
K[NNLrTH L.. EDWARDI
P.O. BOX 10,~
T!a I'llHONE (714)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERIIDE, GAI.,IIfORNIA eJlO*
May 21, 1986
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention= Regional Team No. 2
Ladies and Gentlemen=
Re:
Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 3)
The District's report on tentative Parcel Map 21383 dated March
20, 1986 is still current for the above land division.
Very truly yours,
KENKETH L. EDWARDS
f, n ine
OHN H. FOkSHUBA
;enior Civil Engineer
Road Dept.
Dept. of Building
& Safety
Attn= Eric Traboulay
MC~pml
__ KB'N.NE'TH I,. EDWARDS
CHIBIf BNelNI'ER
1Blab N ARK!.'T
P.O. BOX IO]3
TIll'PHONE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERIID[. CALIFORNIA l~lOl
March 20, 1986
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Attention: Regional Team No. 2
Ladies and Gentlemen=
Re:
Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 2)
Parcel Map 21383 is a proposal to subdivide approximately 164
acres in the Temecula area. The property is located southwest of
Diaz Road, westerly of Rancho California Airport.
The northeasterly portion of this property is located within the
Murrieta Creek 100 year flood plain. Finished floors of all
buildings must be elevated above expected flooding levels.
'['he property is subject to offsite storm flows along its
southwest boundary. These flows should be collected and conveyed
to an adequate outlet.
The District is concerned about development occurring in the
Murrieta Creek watershed. The cumulative effect of development
will cause increased storm runoff and, without adequate drainage
facilities in the area, will have a significant adverse impact on
downstream properties. A practical and equitable mitigating
measure for such an impact is the adoption and implementation of
an Area Drainage Plan. Adoption of the Murrieta Area Drainage
Plan, however, is not expected until the Spring of 1986. Rather
than await formal adoption of the Murrieta Area Drainage Plan,
the developer has requested that a condition of approval be added
requiring a drainage mitigation payment prior to construction.
Following are the District's recommendations:
In accordance with the written request of the applicant
to the County of Riverside, dated January 31, 1986, the
final map shall not be recorded until the applicant, his
successors or assigns, has executed a Special Drainage
Facilities Agreement with the County. Grading and
building permits shall not be issued for Parcel Map 21383
or any unit thereof until the developer has provided
evidence of compliance with the terms of the Agreement.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Ret Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 2)
-2- March 20, 1986
10.
The property should be graded so that all building sites
will be free from flooding from Murrieta Creek during a
100 year storm.
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facili-
ties.
Development of this property should be coordinated with
the development of adjacent properties to ensure that
watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from one watershed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or off-
site construction and grading.
Drainage facilities located outside of road right of way
should be contained within drainage easements shown on
the final map. A note should be added to the final map
stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free of build-
ings and obstructions."
All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained
within the street right of way. When either of these
criteria are exceeded, additional drainage facilities
should be installed.
Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be
designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows.
Additional emergency escape should also be provided.
The properry's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area
and outlet points.
A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of
the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the
District for review prior to the recordation of the final
map.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Parcel Map 21383
(Amended Map No. 2)
-3-
March 20, 1986
CC~
ll.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District for review
prior to recordation of the final map.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
Chief Engineer
DAVID T. SHELDON
Chief of Planning Division
Road Dept.
Dept. of Building
& Safety
Attn: Eric Traboulay
Neste, Brudin and Stone
MC:pml
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ~'~.. TITL£: DEPT HD
HTG: ~..,z.~.~o PARCEL MAP NO. 2q169 CITY ATTY
DEPT: ~,~.~.~r~ CITY I~R
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council RECEIVE and FILE Parcel Map No. 24169, subject to the
conditions of approval.
DISCUSSION
The parcel map is located south of Margarita Road north of Rancho California
Road, east of Lindy Way and west of Moraga Road. The project is to divide 4.4
acres into two parcels. The applicant is Kindercare Learning Center, Inc.,
represented by the J.M. Burnsfine Company.
This project was submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on
October 28, 1988, and was approved by the Board of Supervisors on September
19, 1989.
The following fees have been paid for this project:
Fee Amount
Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
Flood Mitigation
13,625.00
4, 7~8.25
4,287. O0
No bonds were required by the County of Riverside for this project as bonds for
Plot Plan No. 10694 have been posted for the improvements shared with this
project. A security deposit of $17,802.00 has been paid for street improvements
by Parcel Map 21469. This project will have only one access to Rancho California
Road as shown on the parcel map. The access for the proposed day care center
will be from Lyndie Lane.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not determined
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE and FILE Final Tract Map
24169, subject to the conditions of approval.
OFFICE OF THE ROAD CONNISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Ivan F. Termant Actin9
Road Commissioner
County Achsinistrative Center
Mailing Address: PO Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
Telephone (714) 787-6554
May 16, 1990
SUBMITTAL TO FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
FRO~: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula
SUBJECT: Parcel Map 24169
in the First Supervisorial District
SPECIFIC REQUEST:
Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it
is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map.
All required certificates and documents have been filed and
the map is Feady for recordation.
IFT:GA$:MSB:rdb
Ivan F. Tennant
Acting City Engineer
City of Temecula
Parcel Map 24169
2 May 18, 1990
Attached is Tax Bond No. 3SM 75741700 in the amount of
$30,200 issued by American Motorists Insurance Company.
This map complies in all respects with the provisions of
Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local
ordinances.
The dedications made on the above referenced map are for:
Lots "A" through D" inclusive and the abutters rights of
access along Rancho California Road are dedicated for public
road and public utility purposes and as part of the City
Maintained Road System.
GRADED APTS.
A cu a~eo 0
PP 10494 ~
COMM.
U/C.
APTS
VAC
COMM.
o APTS
~ ~* APTS VAC
VAC
4.3O,f~.z
VAC
VAC
STA.
VAC
RD.
VAC
KINDER-CARE LEARNING CENTER, INC.
Use 4.4Ac. INTO TWO PARCELS
TEMECULA ·
!'e,m,.t .ANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.'~IAL_110'
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT r,'c. SCALE
I;M/:~4169 ~EXISTING ZONING
'' R-3 ~ ,o°
R-2-3,OOO O.--
R-3-3,_OO0
I 3
R-3-4,000
liD.
R-3
C-1/C-P
J
R-3
R-2
R-3
R-3
SP ~80 R-R
App. KINDER- CARE LEARNING CENTER, INC. LOCATIONAg.
Uae 4.4Ac. INTO TWO PARCELS ..~
-- TEMECULA Sup.Di~t. lST
~.~ST.7~W. A~,;,~'S~ 921 ~.~1(10)
~~ ~ FREEWAY VARIABLE ~ .
1~ ~' R~I~ ~~ P~NNING ~R~ENT ~o ~c~
/ !
// //
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CITY SEAL CONTEST
CXTY ~
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by City Manager that City Council award certificates
to winners of the City Seal Contest and direct City Manager to submit
designs to commercial artists for preparation of a permanent seal.
BACKGROUND
The Chamber of Commerce coordinated a contest for students in
Temecula schools to submit ideas for a City seal.
One hundred entries were received and judged by a committee chaired
by Councilmember Pat Birdsall.
The following winners were selected:
First Place - Originality
Dominique Alcantar
Temecula Middle School
First Place - Artwork
Kris Kennedy
Temecula Middle School
First Place - Slogan
Heather Short
Temecula Middle School
Honorable Mention
Michael Ramos
Temecula Middle School
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
ABI: /4
MTG: G.z~-~o
DEPT:'~..~.~
TITLE:Adopting of Resolution Establishing
the City's Appropriations Limit for
Fiscal Year 1990-91
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
Reoouuendation:
That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing
the City's Appropriations Limit for FY 1990-91 of $9,772,450.
DiSCUSSiOn: Using cost of living data provided by the State of
California and population data provided by the County of Riverside
the City'sAppropriations Limit for FY 1990-91 has been computed to
be $9,772,450. Appropriations subject to limitation proposed in
the FY 1990-91 Budget total $7,994,822 which is $1,777,628 less
than the computed limit.
Additional appropriations to the Budget funded by nontax sources
such as service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies,
grants or beginning fund balances would be unaffected by the
Appropriations Limit. However, any supplemental appropriations
funded through increased tax sources would be subject to the
Appropriations Limit and could not exceed the $1,777,628 variance
indicated above. Further, any overall actual receipts from tax
sources greater than $1,777,628 from budget estimates will result
in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations
Limits, requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal
years or voters approval of an increased in the City's
Appropriations Limit.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As indicated in the attached schedule, the City's appropriations
subject to limitation as proposed in the FY 1990-91 Budget are
$1,777,628 less than the computed limit. Any supplemental
appropriations funded throughnontax sources would be unaffected by
the Appropriations Limit. However, supplemental appropriations
funded through tax revenues in excess of budget projections would
be subject to limitation and could not exceed the $1,777,628 margin
indicated above. Further, any overall increases in tax sources
greater than $1,777,628 from budget estimates will result in
proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limit,
requiring refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years of
voter approval of an increase in the City's Appropriations Limit.
-1-
In implementing the provisions of SB 1352 as they relate to the
Gann Initiative, it is recommended the City Council adopt the
attached Resolution establishing the City's Appropriations Limit
for FY 1990-91 of $9,777,450.
Schedule 1,
Classification of Revenue Sources and Calculation
of Limit Margin
Resolution Establishing Appropriations Limit for FY 1990-91
Exhibit A, Computation of Appropriations Limit
-2-
RESOLI.rrION NO. 90-
A RESOLU~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
~ CITY OF TEM~CULA ESTABLISHING
THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY1990-
91
~, the voters approved the Gann Spending-Limitation Initiative (Proposition
4) on November 6, 1979, adding Article XIII B to the Constitution of the State of California to
establish and define annual appropriation limits on state and local governmental entities;
WHEi~AS, SB 1352 provides for the implementation of Article XIII B by defining
various terms used in this article and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific
provisions of the article, including the establishment by resolution each year by the governing
body of each local jurisdiction of its appropriations limits;
~~4~S, the required computations to determine the Appropriations Limit for
FY1990-91 have been performed by the Department of Finance and are on file with the Office
of the City Clerk, and available for public review;
WHEREAS, these computations are provided on the two pages of Exhibit 'A" which
is herein incorporated by reference and attached hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T!~IECULA
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Appropriations Limit for the City of Temecula for FY1990-91 is
$9,772,450.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall
cause a certified resolution to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
~ 67 06107190
SCHEDULE !
CLASSIFICATION OF REVENUE SOURCES AND
CALCULATION OF LIMIT MARGIN
1990-91
PROPERTY TAX
OTHER TAXES
Salle Tax
Property tranefer tax
Franchise flee
Tranelent occupancy tax
Business license
LICENSES & PERMITS
FINES & FORFEITURES
REVENUE FROM USE OF MONEY
Cigarette tax
Motor vehicle in lieu
State gee tax revenues
County trane~ortation
NON-TAX
PROCEEDS
276,072
4,124,716
33,000
TAX
PROCEEDS
1,000,000
4,000,000
199,971
253,320
38,000
48,322
1,135,374
423,081
871,554
GRANTS
OVERHEAD REIMBURSEMENT - CSD
INVESTMENT INTEREST
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMITATION
GAHNAPPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
MARGIN
50,000
198,244
14,800
25,200
$ 4,696,832 7,994,822
7,994,822
9,772,450
$ 1,777,628
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMPUTATION OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Base Appropriations Limit ....................... $8,500,000
U.S. Consumer Price Index Change** .......... 4.8%
Population Change* (16.67 X 7/12) ......... 9.7%
Cumulative Compound (1.048 x 1.097) ........ 14.97%
FY 1990-91 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT ................. $9,772,450
*SOURCE:
County of Riverside, Planning Departments, Change in
population for the unincorporated areas of the County.
**SOURCE: State of California, Departments of Finance, Price and
Population data for local jurisdictions
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ~5 TITLE: DEPT HD
HTG: 6/26/90 ]~rsonnM Po~cies CITY ATTY
DEPT: C.M. CITY HGR
RF~O~ATION:
That City Council review the Draft Personnel Policies (for discussion only) manual dated May
23, 1990 and transmitted under separate cover. That Council adopt a resolution establishing
personnel policies governing attendance and leaves as proposed by consultant Michael Deblieux
of Ideas for Effective Management and adopt an Ordinance adding Chaper 2.60 to the Temecula
Municipal Code which establishes a personnel system.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council previously authorized IEM consulting firm to prepare standard personnel
policies for City employees. These rules set vacation, holiday and leave regulations and provide
basic management rights and employee rights.
The rules govern such things as recruiting, hiring and disciplining city employees and they
establish pay and promotion procedures.
These rules are consistent with other cities in Southern California and will keep Temecula
competitive in attracting and retaining City employees.
These rules do not confer benefits such as health, retirement or insurance plans. That will come
later.
The recommendation to adopt the attached resolution provides the City Manager with a policy
to administer attendance and leaves (i.e. sick leave) immediately. The recommendation to adopt
the attached ordinance sets up the vehicle to adopt all of the recommended personnel policies
contained in the Draft prepared by IF_aM, after you have reviewed them and made any
modifications desired.
FDA:jsg
RESOLSON NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TH6:
crrY OF TEMECUIA PROVIDING FOR ~
F, STABU~ OF PERSONNY. POLICIES
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.08.060(b) of the City's Municipal
Code, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to
adopt those policies as identified below;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RF. SOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula as follows:
Section 1. The following Personnel Policies are hereby adopted pending the adoption
of a comprehensive personnel system pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government
Code:
Attendance - Non-exempt Employees
Comprehensive Annual Leave
Holidays
Iury Duty
Leave of Absence Without Pay
Military Leave
Such policies are attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2.
thereafter amended.
Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the above policies.
Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict
Resolution are hereby rescinded.
Section S. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
These Personnel Policies shall become effective immediately and may be
with this
Resolution 90-
Page 2
PASSim, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 26th day of June, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
I HEREBY CERTWY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of June,
1990 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
Attendance - ~on-exempt bployees
ielsted policies:
Discipline
¢ceprehensive ~nnual Leave
!~licv:
b~ortina to #ork: Each non-exempt employee is expected
to report to work and to be prepared to work at the start
of each work shift he/she is scheduled to work.
Absence: If a non-exempt employee is unable to report to
cork for any reason, he/she must call his/her supervisor
within 30 minutes of his/her scheduled start time. The
employee must tell his/her supervisor why he/she will not
be able to report to work and when he/she does expect to
return to work. If the supervisor is not available, the
employee must provide the required information by calling
his/her Department Head or the Personnel Office.
Tsrdiness: Non-exempt employees must notify their
supervisor within 30 minutes of their scheduled starting
time, if they will be unable to report to work on time.
If a non-exempt employee notifies his/her
supervisor within thirty (30) minutes of
his/her scheduled start time that he/she will
be late to work, the tardiness may be charged
to Comprehensive~nnual Leave in increments of
fifteen (15) minutes.
Except in a bona fide emergency, if a non-
exempt employee does not call in within 30
minutes of his/her scheduled start time, to
report that he/she will be unable to report to
work, the absence will not be compensated or
charged to Comprehensive Annual Leave.
Ce
#hen a non-exempt employee is tardy, the
supervisor will determine the time at which the
employee may begin working.
Discipline: A non-exempt employee nay be disciplined for
absenteeism or tardiness which affects the employee's
ability to perform his/her assigned duties; interferes
with the efficient or effective operation of City
proqrams, or, establishes a pattern of abuse or neglect.
~-k'tect: Comprehermive Annual Leave
Related Policies:
Attendance
Holidays
Leave of Absence Without Pay
Back~r~,nd:
Probationary and regular employees earn Comprehensive Annual Leave
(CAL) credits. CAL is intended to provide eligible employees with
paid time off for rest and relaxation, personal or family illness,
and personal business. In most cases, the City expects eligible
employees to request time off in advance. In all cases, eligible
employees must request the time off from their supervisor, or if
the supervisor is not available, their Department Head or the
Personnel Office.
Any employee who is frequently absent without the prior approval
of his/her supervisor, may create unnecessary scheduling
difficulties for the City. Employees may be subject to disciplinary
action up to and including dismissal for excessive absenteeismor
tardiness.
Policy:
eliethilitv: Probationary and regular employees earn
Comprehensive Annual Leave credits from the date of hire.
a. Project employees ~o not earn Comprehensive
Annual Leave Credits.
Accru-1 Rate - Probationary ~qd Regular. ~,11-time Stsff
~Dlovees: Probationary and regular full-time staff
employees earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits in
accordance with the following schedule:
Yemrs of Service
Accruals per
Period
Approximate
Annual Accrual
First day of employment
through year l
Beginning year
Beginning year
Beginning year
Beginning year
Beginning year
and thereafter
5.538 hours
6.153 hours
6.769 hours
7.384 hours
8.000 hours
8.923 hours
18 days
20 days
22 days
24 days
26 days
29 days
a. Probationary and regular full-time staff employees who
are paid for less than eighty (80) hours in a pay period
Co~prehensive Annual I~ave
Page 2
will earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits on a pro-
rated basis for that pay period,
Acc~,~l P~te - Probation~rv ~d Reaul~r. Manaoement ~d
~UDerViSOrV P-11-?tmemuDlovees: Probationary and regular
full-time staff employees earn Comprehensive Annual Leave
credits in accordance with the following schedule:
Yenrs of ~ervice
Accruals per
P~v Period
Approximate
Annual Accrual
First day of employment
through year 1
Beginning year 2
Beginning year 4
Beginning year 6
Beginning year 8
Beginning year 10
and thereafter
6.770 hours
7.385 hours
8.000 hours
8.616 hours
9.231 hours
10.154 hours
22 days
24 days
26 days
28 days
30 days
33 days
Probationary and regular full-time employees
who are paid for less than eighty (80) hours
in a pay period will earn Comprehensive Annual
Leave credits on a pro-rated basis for that
pay period.
Accrual Rate - Probationary mnd Reaulsr Port-Time
~mDlovee!: Probationary and regular part-time employees
earn Comprehensive Annual Leave credits in accordance
with the schedule shown above on a pro-rata basis in
increments of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% (ie., a part-time
employee who normally works 20% of a 40 hour week would
accrue 25% of the CAL credits of a probationary or
regular full-time employee).
liAr_Before Credits are Earned: An eligible employee may
not use Comprehensive Annual Leave credits before they
are earned.
IJse: Normally, eligible employees are expected to
schedule Comprehensive Annual Leave time off in advance
with their supervisor.
In in urgent or emergency situation, an
eligible employee may request Comprehensive
Annual Leave time off on an unscheduled basis
by calling his/her supervisor within the first
thirty minutes of his/her scheduled start time
(see Attendance policy).
C~pr~h~nsive Annual Leave
l~age 3
be
· xcessive -n~cheduled time off whether
compensated by Comprehensive ~nnual Leave or
not, may result in discipline up to and
including termination.
]MAJ]gpAcc~,~l: At any given time, an eligible employee
may not have a ComprehensiveAnnual Leave balance of more
than two times (2x) his/her annual accrual rate. The City
may schedule eligible employees to take Comprehensive
Annual Leave time off to satisfy this requirement. The
City may, at its option, buy back unused Comprehensive
Annual Leave credits once each calendar year.
8. Nini~,~ ~h~rae: The minimum charge to Comprehensive
Annual Leave credits is fifteen (15) minutes.
Holidays: If a holiday falls within a time period when
an eligible employee is using Comprehensive Annual Leave
credits, the holiday will not be charged to Comprehensive
Annual Leave [see Holiday policy].
10.
Leave of~.-ence Without Psv: An eligible employee who is on
a Leave of Absence Without Pay will not accrue Comprehensive
Annual Leave credits.
At the City's discretion, an eligible employee
may be required to exhaust all Comprehensive
Annual Leave credits before the employee is
granted a Leave of Absence Without Pay.
11.
Termination P-v-off: All accrued Comprehensive Annual Leave
credits will be paid at the eligible employee's regular rate
of pay at the time of termination, death or retirement.
~-htect: Bolidays
p~.l icy:
1. ~he City observes the following holidays:
New ¥ear's Day
Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday
President's Day
Memorial Day
July 4th
Labor Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Friday after Thanksgiving
Christmas Day
~-ervmace: Holidays which fall on a Saturday will
normally be observed on the preceding Friday. Holidays
which fall on a Sunday will normally be observed on the
following Monday. The City Manager will determine the
actual dates holiday~ will be observed each year.
Wliaihilitv: Probationary~nd r~lularfu11-time~ndpart-
ti~e employees who are eligible for holiday pay and are
on paid status for their entire regular work shift
i~ediately prior to and l~mediately following the
holiday will be paid for the holiday.
Project employees are not eligible for holiday
pay except as specifically authorized by the
City Manager.
4. ~'o~oen!atton:
Probationar~ ~nd regular full-ti~e employees
who are eligible for holiday pay receive eight
hours holiday pay on a City observed holiday.
Probatioa~r~ ~d regular part-tiM employees
who are eligible for holiday pay receive
holiday pay for the hours that they would have
normally been scheduled to work had the day
not been a holiday.
Morkona Holiday: If a probationary or regular
non-exempt employee who is not scheduled to
work on a holiday, is required to work on a
holiday, he/she will be paid for the actual
hours of work at the rate of one and one half
times his/her regular rate. In addition, the
employee will bepaid holiday pay as explained
in Paragraph 4.a. and b. ~bove or be given
equivalent holiday time off on another day as
determined by the City.
~-~ect: Ju~y D~ty
l~ltcy:
bployees may attend Jury duty in accordance with their legal
obligations to do so. An employee who is summoned to Jury duty
will be placed on a paid leave of absence for up to 90
calendar days. If the employee is required to serve for more
than 90 calendar days, he/she will be placed on a Leave of
Absence #ithout Pay.
Upon receipt of payment from the court, the employee must
provide a copy of the payment check stub to the City. The jury
service fees (not including mileage) will be deducted from the
employee's pay in a subsequent pay period.
Leave of Absence Without Pay
le£erance:
Anniversary Dates
Abandonment Policy
Comprehensive Annual Leave Policy
Employee Benefit Plans (ie., medical insurance, PERS, etc.)
Nilitary Leave
Backaround:
The City expects employees to be at work on days that they are
scheduled to work. The City provides a generous Comprehensive
Annual Leave (CAL) policy for regular employees. These credits are
intended to provide employees with paid time off to deal with
personal issues or needs. However, the City also recognizes that
an employee may occasionally encounter a personal situation which
requires additional time away from the }oh for which the employee
has not accrued enough CAL credits. Therefore, employees may
request a Leave of Absence #ithout Pay. Generally, such requests
fall into one of three categories: medical, maternity or personal.
The City deals with each type of request separately.
.t~T. PROVI~q:IoNs:
The following provisions apply to a Leave of Absence
#ithout Pay, regardless of the reason for the leave:
Comprehensive Annual Leave Credits will not
accrue during a Leave of Absence #ithout Pay.
All requests for a Leave of Absence Without Pay
must be submitted in writing.
An employee who is granted a Leave of Absence
#ithout Pay and does not return to work on the
first regularly scheduled day of work following
the completion of the approved leave may be
terminated (see Abandonment Policy).
A Leave of Absence #tthout Pay of more than
thirty (30) days will result in an adjustment
to the employee's service anniversary date.
A Leave of Absence Without Pay in excess of
five (5) days must be approved by the City
!qanager.
Leave of Absence #i~ut Pay
Page 2
MEDXCJ~V~- OF~nq~]~ WITHOUT PAY:
An employee who is medically disabled may be granted a
Xedica! Leave ofAbsence Without Pay for up to one year.
Medically disabled means unable to perform
assigned work duties as determined by a
Licensed medical practitioner.
be
The City Manager, or a designee, may require,
at City expense, that the employee submit to
an examination by a City selected physician.
If the employee is unable to return to work at the
completion of the Medical Leave of Absence Without Pay,
he/she may request a Personal Leave of Absence #ithout
Pay.
ae
The granting of a Personal Leave of Absence
Without Pay is at the discretion of the city
Manager, or a designee.
The City will continue to pay its share of the cost of
insurance premiums for the employee and eligible
dependents for up to the first four months when an
employee is on an approved Medical Leave of Absence.
An employee who is granted a Medical Leave of Absence Without
Pay for other than maternity reasons will be returned to their
previous position or an equivalent position at the discretion
of the City Manager, or a designee.
MAT~KHITY T.~V~. OF ~DS~qCE WITHOtrT PAY:
A~l of the provisions of a #edical Leave of Absence
Without Pay shall apply to a Maternity Leave of Absence
Without Pay for medical reasons except as
Unless her position has been abolished, an
employee who is on aM at·miry Leave of Absence
for medical reasons, wi~! be returned to her
original position at the completion of a
Maternity Leave of Absence Without Pay.
(continued on next page)
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
Leave of Absence Without Pay
Page 3
P~tSONAL v.~AVE OF ~SENC~. WITHOUT PAY:
An employee who has completed at least one
continuous service may request a Personal
Absence Without Pay for up to one year.
year
Leave
of
of
The approval of a Personal Leave of Absence
Without Pay will be at the sole discretion of
the City Manager, or a designee.
bo
Art employee who is granted a Personal Leave of
Absence Without Pay must use all accrued
ComprehensiveAnnual Leave credits before being
placed on unpaid status.
Co
After exhausting his/her Comprehensive Annual
Leave credits, the employee shall be
responsible for the entire cost of insurance
premiums for the employee and any eligible
dependents.
An employee who is granted a Personal Leave of Absence
Without Pay and desires to return prior to the expiration
of the approved leave may request, in writing, permission
to return earlier.
The approval of a request to return prior to
the expiration of a Personal Leave of Absence
Without Pay shall be at the sole discretion of
the City Manager, or a designee.
An employee who is granted a Personal Leave of Absence
Without Pay will be returned to their previous position
or an equivalent position at the discretion of the City
Manager, or a designee, provided that such a position is
available at or near the time the employee is scheduled
to return.
ao
An employee maybe placed on lay-off status or
terminated depending upon the needs of the City
during the course of a Personal Leave of
Absence Without Pay.
n,,~,4~ct: Ktl~tar~ Leave
An employee who enters the armed forces of the United States
will beplaced on an extended leave of absence without pay in
accordance with applicable federal or state laws. Upon
completion of military service, the employee will be
reinstated with full seniority to his/her former position or
to a comparable position if application for reemployment is
made within 90 calendar days of release from the service or
related hospitalization.
An employee who is a member of the #·tiehal Guard or of a
reserve component of the armed forces shall, upon furnishinq
· copy of the official orders or instructions, be granted a
military training leave. Training leaves will not, except in
an emergency, or in event of extenuating circumstances, exceed
two weeks per year, plus re··enable travel time. Upon
presentation of a military pay voucher, employees will be
reimbursed for the difference between their normal
compensation and the pay they received while on military duty.
ORDINANCE NO. 90-O7
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TE3~IECI.1LA ADDING CHAPTER 2.60 TO THE
'I'I~I~2L~A MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A
PERSONNg~L SYSTEM ENTITLED *pER .qON'N-F.I. SYSTEM"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
read as follows:
Chapter 2.60 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code which shall
Sections:
2.60.010
2.60.020
2.60.030
2.60.040
2.60.050
2.60.060
2.60.070
2.60.080
2.60.090
2.60.100
2.60.110
2.60.120
2.60. 130
2.60.140
2.60.150
'Chapter 2.60
System Adopted.
Definitions.
Administration
Competitive Service
Adoption and Amendment of Policies and Procedures
Probationary Period.
Status of Present Employees.
Demotion, Dismissal, Reduction in Pay, Suspension, Reprimand.
Right of Appeal.
Lay Off and Reemployment.
Political Activity.
Contract for Special Services.
Appropriation of Funds.
Abolishment of Position.
Oe/21/~0
Ordinance No. 90-
Page 2.
2.60.010. System Adopted.
In order to establish an equitable and uniform procedure for dealing with
personnel matters and to comply with applicable laws relating to the administration of the
personnel process, the following personnel system is hereby adopted.
.060.020 r)efinitions.
The terms used to administer the personnel system shall be defined in the
personnel policies.
2.040.030 Administration
The City Manager shall administer the city personnel system and may delegate
any of the powers and duties of such administration to any other officer or employee of the city
or may recommend that such powers and duties be performed under contract as provided in
Section 2.60.130. The City Manager shall:
(a) Act as the appointing authority for the City in accordance with
§2.08.060(b) of the Municipal Code;
(b) Administer all the provisions of this chapter and of the personnel policies
and procedures not specifically reserved to the Council;
(c) Prepare or cause to be prepared personnel policies and procedures and
revisions. The City Attorney shall approve the legality of such policies and procedures and
revisions prior to their submission to their implementation;
(d) Recommend to the City Council personnel policy issues involving financial
commitments such as, but not limited to, pay rates and employee benefit programs;
(e) Prepare or cause to be prepared, a position classification plan, including
class specifications, and revisions of the plan;
(0 Prepare, or cause to be prepared, a plan of compensation, and revisions
thereof, covering all classification titles for authorized City positions. The plan and any
revisions thereof shall become effective upon approval of the Council;
(g) Have the authority to discipline employees in accordance with this
ordinance and the personnel policies of the City;
(h) Provide for the recruitment and selection of City employees based upon
open or promotional recruitment, and performing any other duty that may be required to
administer the personnel system.
Ordinance No. 90-
~.60.040. Competitive Service
The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all offices, positions and employments
in the service of the City which offices, positions and employments shall be in the competitive
service, except this chapter shall not apply to:
(a) Members of the City Council;
(b) Members of the appointive boards, commissions and committees;
(c) Persons engaged under contract to supply expert, professional, or technical
service for a definite period of time.
(d) Volunteer personnel, who receive no regular compensation from the City.
(e) City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager, City Treasurer, Assistant City
Manager and/or Assistant to the City Manager, City Treasurer, City Clerk;
(f) Department Heads and other management positions so designated by the
city Manager.
(g) Emergency employees who are hired to meet the immediate requirements
of an emergency condition such as extraordinary fire, flood or earthquake which threatens life
0i) Employees, other than those listed elsewhere in this section, who are not
regularly employed in positions. *Regularly employed in positions' means an employee hired
for an indefinite term into a budgeted position, who is regularly scheduled to work no less than
forty 940) hours per week and has successfully completed the probationary period and been
retained as provided in this ordinance and the personnel policies;
(i) Any position primarily funded under state or federal employment
by the City Council to be in the classified service at the time of creation or thereafter.
Any new position hereafter crated by the City Council, unless declared
Employees not included in the competitive service under this section shall serve
at the will of their appointing authority and may be discharged without cause or right of appeal.
Ordinance No. 90-
Page 4.
9.60.050. Adoption nnd Amendment off,Policies
Personnel policies shall be prepared and may be amended from time to time by
the City Manager, subject to the review of the City Council. Any policy matters involving the
commitment of financial resources shall be recommended and must be approved by the City
Council prior to implementation. The policies shall govern the personnel system, including but
not limited to:
(a) Preparation, installation, revision and maintenance of a position
classification plan covering all positions in the competitive service, including employment
standards and qualifications for each class;
(b) Preparation, revision and administration of a plan of compensation directly
correlated with the position classification plan providing a rate or range of pay for each class;
(c) ~ and promotional recruitment to fill regular positions;
(d) The making of temporary and emergency appointments;
(e) Establishment of probationary testing periods;
(f) Transfer, promotion, demotion and reinstatement of employees;
Evaluation of the job performance of employees;
(h) Separation of employees from the City service;
(i) Content, maintenance and use of personnel records and forms;
The establishment of any necessary appeal procedures.
2.60.060. Appointments
(a) Appointments to vacant positions in the competitive service shall be made
in accordance with the personnel policies. Appointments and promotions shall be based on merit
and fitness. Examinations shall be used in and conducted to aid in the selection of qualified
employees, and shall consist of selection techniques which will test fairly the qualifications of
candidates such as achievement and aptitude tests and other written tests, personal interviews,
performance tests, physical agility tests, evaluation of daily work performance, work samples
or any combinatioo of these tests. The probation period shall be considered an extension of the
examination process. Physical, medical and psychological tests may be given as part of any
examination.
(b) In any examination, the City Manager or his designee may include, in
addition to the competitive tests, qualifying test or tests, and set minimum standards therefore.
(c) The appointing authority of employees in the competitive service is the
City Manager. The City Manager may delegate the appointing authority to any other officer or
employee of the City.
~.60.070 ProbntlonnO, Period
All regular appointments, including promotional appointments, shall be for a
probationary period in accordance with applicable provisions of the personnel policies.
Determination as to satisfactory completion or extension of said period, and/or rejection of an
employee during said period, shall also be consistent with the applicable provisions of the
personnel policies and procedures.
2.60.080 Status of Present ~.mployees.
Any person holding a position in the competitive service who, on the effective
date of this ordinance, shall have served continuously in such position, or in some other position
in the competitive service for a period equal to the probationary period prescribed in the
personnel policies and procedure for his class, shall assume regular status in the competitive
service in the position held on such effective date without qualifying test, and shall thereafter
be subject in all respects to the provisions of this ordinance and the personnel policies and
procedures.
Any other persons holding positions in the competitive service shall be regarded
as probationers who are serving out the balance of their probationary periods as prescribed in
the personnel policies and procedures before obtaining regular status. The probationary period
shall be computed from the date of appointment or employment.
All employees as defined under this section are employed subject to the personnel
system established herein which in accordance with Government Code §53291, supersedes any
other system.
2.60.090 r~emotion. r)ismis~l. Reduction in Pay. Su~i)ension. R~rimand.
The City Manager or any appointing authority shah have the authority to demote,
discharge, reprimand, reduce in pay or suspend any regular employee for cause in accordance
with procedures included in the personnel policies.
2.60.100 l~ight of ~
Any employee in the competitive service shaU have the right to appeal a demotion,
reduction in pay, suspension exceeding five (5) days, or discharge for disciplinary reasons,
except in those instances where the right of appeal is specifically prohibited by this ordinance
or the policies and procedures adopted thereunder. All appeals shall be processed iti accordance
with the requirements and the procedures as set forth in the personnel policies and procedures
adopted pursuant to this ordinance.
2.60.110
Lay off and
personnel policies.
2.60.120
I ~ Off and Reeml?loyment
reemployment actions shall follow the process outlined in the
Political Activity
The political activities of City employees shall conform to the pertinent provision
of state law and any local provision adopted pursuant to state law.
2.60.130 Contract for Sl?ecia! Services
The City Manager shall consider and make recommendations to the City Council
regarding the extent to which the City should contract for the performance of technical personnel
system. The City Council may contract with any qualified person or public or private agency
for the performance of all or any of the following responsibilities and duties imposed by this
2.60.140 Al~ropriafion of Funds
The City Council shall appropriate such funds as are necessary to cax~ out the
provisions of this chapter.
9.60.150 Abolishment of Position
Whenever in the judgement of the Council it becomes necessary in the interests
of economy or because the necessity for the position involved no longer exists, the Council may
abolish any position or employment in the classified service and discharge the employee or
officer holding such position or employment.'
0~121/~0
Section 2. Sl::.V~.RARN.ITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of
this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 3. I~.FF!::CTIV~. PATNa. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause the same to be postal in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROV!~ AND ADOPTED this 26th day June, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks
Mayor
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss.
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify the
foregoing Ordinance No. 90- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of June, 1990, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
,1990, by the following vote, to wit:
COUNCILI~MBERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMB~:
CO~CILM~ERS:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
AB#:
HTG:
DE:PT
TITLE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPEAL ~2, TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 21769, REVISED NO. 1
AMENDED NO. 2
OEPT "l~~
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Staff recommends that the City Council CONTINUE the APPEAL for
Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769, Amended No. 2 off calendar in order to
allow staff additional time to review the project and analyze the appeal.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Case No.:
Applicant:
Appellant:
Reason for Appeal:
Project:
Location:
Zoning:
Existing Land Use:
Surrounding Zoning:
SWAP Designations:
Project Statistics:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769
RANPAC, Inc.
J.C. Resorts, Inc.
See attached application
Revised 4-1or subdivision of 91.37 acres.
West side of Rainbow Canyon Road, immediately south
of the Temecula Creek Inn.
R-R Rural Residential
Vacant hillside property
Rural Residential
Residential - 8-16 dwelling units per acre, OC - Office
Commercial; R-S - Resort Commercial
Number of Lots: 4
Number of Acres: 91.37
BACKGROUND
On June 12, 1990, the City Council continued this item. Additional time is needed
for review before staff can fully assess the parameters of the project and the
merit of the Appeal.
Jt~ 11 'B8i10:48 J.W. COLACHIS CO. P.2/2
Ju31e 11, 3.990
No. Ross Geller
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temeoula, California 92390
Re=
binboy canyon Site
Tentative Parcel Nap No. 21769; Appeal No. 2
Dear Mr, Geller:
It is my understanding that Ranpac Engineering Corp. wishes to
continue this matter for an additional four week period. We are
attempting to work. with representativel from Ranpac and will be
meeting with them in an attempt to resolve our outltanding issues
a~icably and additional time is required for this purpose
we appreciate your cooperation and indulgence in this matter.
Very truly yours,
UCRESORTS
a California limited partnership
By: THB ~. W~IACHIS COMPANY
Paul L. Reed, Vice President
PLR=awb
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: Iq
HTG:b-~..~-~o
DEPT:~,,'~%
TITLE:
Ai'Yi::AL Nu. :l
PLOT PLAN NO. 11#99
CITY
CITY HGR
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Staff recommends:
That the City Council UPHOLD the appellant's APPEAL, subject to the
recommendations of the City Traffic Engineer, based on findings and
analysis contained in the County report; and
APPROVE Plot Plan No. 11499, based on the analysis and findings
contained in the County staff report, subject to the conditions of approval
revised in APPEAL NO. 3.
CASE INFORMATION
Date Appeal Filed:
Case No.:
Appellant:
Representative:
Proposal:
Location:
Zoning:
Surrounding Zoning:
Surrounding Land Uses:
Project Information:
North:
South:
East:
West:
North:
South:
East:
West:
April 27, 1990
Appeal No. 3, Plot Plan 11499
Escondidio National Bank
Tucker, Sadler, & Associates
An Appeal for relief from a condition of approval placed
on Plot Plan No 11499 by the Riverside County Road
Department.
Northwest corner of Winchester Road and Enterprise
Circle North.
M-SC/Manufacturing-Service Commercial
M-SC/Manufacturing-Service Commercial
M-SC/Manufactur!ng-Service Commercial
M-SC/Manufacturlng-Service Commercial
M-SC/Manufacturing-Service Commercial
Vacant/Commercial Center
Commercial Center
Commercial Center
Vacant/Commercial
Proposed 10,000 square foot bank/commercial building.
ANALYSIS
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Plot Plan No. 11499 is a proposal for a 10,000 square foot bank/commercial
building on .95 acres. The project is located on the northwest corner of
Winchester Road and Enterprise Circle North. The project was tentatively
approved at the County of Riverside Planning Directors hearing on April 23,
1990. The Appeal For Relief from County Road Condition No. 1 with the City of
Temecula Planning Department was filed on April 27, 1990.
AREA SETTING
The project site lies within an area of existing commercial development. The site
is flat, and is surrounded by existing infrastructure.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed building will consist of a financial institution and leasable office
areas. Parking has been adequately provided. Landscaping constitutes 29
percent of the proposed site.
APPEAL
The appellant is appealing County Road Condition No. 1, which states:
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this permit,
the applicant shall submit a striping and signing plan that conforms to the
following geometrics for:
ae
Jefferson/Winchester: two northbound through lanes, one
northbound right turn lane, one northbound left turn lane, one
southbound through lane, one southbound right turn lane, two
southbound left turn lanes, three eastbound through lanes, one
eastbound right turn lane, one eastbound left turn lane, two
westbound through lanes, one westbound right turn lane, and two
westbound left turn lanes.
1-15 $.B. Ramp/Winchester: one southbound right turn lane, one
southbound left turn lane, two eastbound through lanes, one
eastbound right turn lane, and two westbound through lanes.
1-15 N.B. Ramp/Winchester: one northbound right turn lane, two
northbound left turn lanes, one eastbound through lane, and one
westbound right turn lane.
The applicant shall provide any widening necessary to implement such, as
approved by the Road Commissioner, all at no cost to any government
agency.
Because of the relatively small scale of this project (.95 acres), and because of
some rece~tt chaft.cles i. Country Road !)e.i)nrtme~tt I)olicy, the !)roject woul(J !rave
been exempt from these require~nents.
The new County policy exempts review of intersections in which the project
impact is less than five (5) perce,t. If the project had been submitted after the
change it would have fallen into this category. The appellant submitted a traffic
study which identified that the impact from the proposed use would be less than
five (5) percent at the intersection of Winchester and Jefferson. This traffic
study was accepted by the City of Temecula Traffic Engineering Department.
The traffic engineer has recommended that the appeal be upheld based on the
findings and new recommendations in the attached report.
SUI~tARY
The Planning Staff recom~nends:
That the City Council UPHOLD the appellant's APPEAL, subject to the
recommendations of the City Traffic Engineer, based on findings and
analysis contained in the County report, and APPROVE Plot Plan No.
11t~99, based on the analysis and findings contained in the County Staff
Report, subject to the conditions of a3proval, as revised in APPEAL NO.
3.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERS REPORT
APPEAL NO. 3
ESCONDIDO BANK, TEMECULA VALLEY BRANCH
PLOT PLAN REVIEW 111/~99
The transportation engineering staff reviewed the letter of appeal submitted by Ms.
Terry Taylor of Tucker, Sadlet I~ Associates on behalf of the applicants. The staff
also reviewed the traffic impact study report regarding the proposed development
prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates and the letter from Riverside County Planning
Commission regarding mitigation measures related to the development.
The following conditions of approval incorporate mitigation measures imposed on the
development by the County of Riverside Planning Commission to achieve the required
level of service:
1. Improve the intersection of Jefferson St. and Winchester Road.
Improve the intersections of 1-15 northbound and southbound ramps
with Winchester Road.
The applicant shall pay for all the required improvements at no cost to
any government agency.
The City staff estimated that the cost of the required improvements is about
$750,000.00.
The applicant is appealing the County's conditions of approval based on the size of
the development as related to the recent changes in the County criteria and
requirement for a traffic impact study.
Based on the new criteria set forth by Riverside County, new development is
exempted from the following:
Submitting a Traffic Impact Study, if the development is less than one
{ 1 ) acre.
!f the project impact at an intersection is less than 5% of peak hour
traffic volumes.
The Engineering staff recommends the following:
ae
The applicant shall not be required to improve the roadway system
specified in the Riverside County Planning Commission letter dated
January 26, 1990, based on the size of the development.
be
The applicant shall sign an agreement with the City of Temecula to pay
a fair share of required transportation improvements. The content and
form of the agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney.
-2-
de
At the time that a Certificate of Occupancy is issued, the applicant is
required to deposit an amount of $10,000.00 to a newly approved City
Road Benefit Fund. The Development Impact Fee Study, currently
being prepared by Willdan Associates, will determine an equitable fair
share of the applicant's cost of improving regional transportation
systems.
When the Development Impact Fee schedule is adopted by the City
Council. the developer will either pay additional funds or receive a
refund equal to the difference between the Development Impact Fee
amount and the amount of deposit.
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92390
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the
matm~s) described below.
Case No: Appml No. 3, Plot Phn 11499
Appellant: Tucker, Sadler and Associates
Location: Northwest corner of Winchester Road and Enterprise Circle North
Reason: Appeal of County Road Deparlment Condition #1 for relief from
improvements at Winchester Road and Jefferson and 1-15 ramps
north- and south-bound at Winchester Road.
Environmental
Action: Negative Declaration for Plot Plan 11499 previously adopted
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing(s) or may
appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The
proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula City
Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM.
Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Mark Rhoades, City of Temecula
Planning Department, (714) 694-1989.
The time, place and date of the hearing(s) are as follows:
PLACE OF HEARING:
DATE OF HEARING:
TIME OF HEARING:
l~:~ncho Cnlifornin Water r)istrict Community Room
28061 r)ia~. Rand
Temeculn
Tuesd~, ~une 26. 1990
7:00 PM
VICINITY MAP
':VICINI'i-Y MAP
1;'.?. Ilq qq
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTIqE#T
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tucker, Sadlet & Associates
2411 Second Avenue
San Diego, CA 92101-1593
Attn: Terry Taylor
PLOT PLAN NO. 11499, AMD. ~1
Project Description: Bank and
commercial office
Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-282-001
District/Area: Temecula
®
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for a bank and commercial
office building.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body
concerning Plot Plan 11499 Amd. #1. The County of Riverside will promptly
notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the
County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
County fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall
not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date;
otherwise, it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A, Amd. ~1, or as amended by these
conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one
(1) year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Road Department's transmittal dated 1-26-90, a copy
of which is attached.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
transmittal dated 1-12-90, a copy of which is attached.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11499, Md.
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
lB.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control District°s transmittal dated 1-6-90, a copy of which is
attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate
section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal
dated 4-11-90, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Oepartment of Building and Safety - Land Use Section's transmittal dated
1-16-gO,a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Oepartment of Building and Safety - Grading Section's transmittal dated
1-12-g0, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Riverside County Geologist's transmittal dated 2-4-88 and 2-5-88, a copy
of which is attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved
landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and
all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition.
Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be
permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, six (6) copies of a Parking,
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, species,
and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all
requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied
by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348.
The irrigation plan shall be in accordance with Ordinance No. 348, section
18.12 and include a rain shutoff device. In addition, the plan will
incorporate the use of in-line check valves, or sprinkler heads with check
valves incorporated to prohibit l~ head drainage.
A minimum of forty-four (44) parking spaces shall be provided in
accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348.
Forty-four (44) parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved
Exhibit A. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete
paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base.
A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown
on Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
PLOT PLAR NO. 11499, /~nd. ll
Conditions af Approval
Page 3
lg.
20.
22.
23.
identified by a pemanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of
~orcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International
ymbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking
space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the si to the
parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of ~ inches
from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall
also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street
parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and
conspicuously stating the following:
'Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed
away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning ."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of
accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain
clearance and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division
of the Department of Building and Safety.
If signage is proposed, a separate plot plan accompanied by the
appropriate fees as set forth in Ordinance No. 348 shall be submitted and
approved by the Planning Department prior to sign installation.
haterials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in
substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit M-2 (Color Elevations)
and Exhibit M-1 (Materials Board). These are as follows:
Use & Material Color
Main Wall Tiles
Accent Band Tiles
Black Anodized Mullions
Blue Reflective Glass
Built up Roof
Accent Column Tiles
Pavers
YM 155/1BG 12
YM 155/1BG 16
Black
Royal Blue
Light Gray
Cherry Red D-101
Ironspot
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to planning Department approval.
One (1) trash enclosure which is adequate to enclose a total of two (2)
bins shall be located within the project, and shall be constructed prior
to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in
PLOT PLA!I NO. 11499. J~!. fl
Conditions of Appraval
Page 4
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
30.
31.
32.
33.
height and shall be made with masonry block and a gate which screens the
bins fran external view.
Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height
of six (6) feet.
All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved
wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated
or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical
plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check
approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan
'This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to
issuance of any building permit by the Riverside County Department of
Building and Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall
certify that the intended structure or building is safe and structurally
integrated. This certification shall be based upon, but not be limited
to, the site specific seismic, geologic and geotechnical conditions.
Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development is determined to exist,
appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated."
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is
based on the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development.
Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
Five ~) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations
to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in
amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance
with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one
year, shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape
planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be
healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall
be properly constructed and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall
installed underground.
Prior to any use allowed by this plot plan, the applicant shall obtain
clearance fran the Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section
that the uses found on the subject property are in conformance with
Ordinance No. 348.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11499, hnd. tl
CondttJons uf Approval
Page 5
34. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy
or any use allowed by this permit.
,.1R:jg
4/12/g0
KENNETH L EDWARDS
1995 MARKET STREET
P.O. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE (714)
FAX NO, (714! 788'9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA g2SO2
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regtonal Team No. -~'
Planner Jo~/~,~
Area
We have revtewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodp~uufing may be required to fully develop to the
impl ted density.
The Oistrtct's report dated ~.~c,-~et/~ is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements I~avJhb~enproject will be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
Very, truly yovr~,
JOHN H. KASHUBA
Senior Civil Engineer
PLOT PLAN I10. 11499, /~nd. fl
Conditions af Approval
Page 2
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control Oistrict's transmittal dated 1-6-90, a copy of which is
attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate
section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal
dated 4-11-90, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set. forth in the
Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section's transmittal dated
1-16-90,a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Building and Safety - Grading Section's transmittal dated
1-12-90, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Riverside County Geologist's transmittal dated 2-4-88 and 2-5-88, a copy
of which is attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved
landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and
all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition.
Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be
permitted to grow higher than thirty {30) inches.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, six (6) copies of a Parking,
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall -be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval The location, number, genus, species,
and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all
requirements of Ordinance Ho. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied
by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Or"~nce Ho. 348.
The irrigation plan shall be in accordance with Ordinance No. 34B, section
1B.12 and include a rmtn shutoff device. In addition, the plan will
incorporate the use of in-line check valves, or sprinkler heads with check
valves incorporated to prohibit low head drainage.
A minimum of forty-four (44) parking spaces shall be provided in
accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348.
Forty-four (44) parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved
Exhibit A. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete
paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base.
A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown
on Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
PLOT PLAN NO. 11499, /bnd. ~1
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
lg.
20.
21.
22.
23.
identified by a pemanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of
~orcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International
ymbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking
space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the
parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches
from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall
also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street
parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and
conspicuously stating the loll owing:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed
away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning ."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of
accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain
clearance and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division
of the Department of Building and Safety.
If signage is proposed, a separate plot plan accompanied by the
appropriate fees as set forth in Ordinance No. 348 shall be submitted and
approved by the Planning Department prior to sign installation.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in
substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit M-2 (Color Elevations)
and Exhibit M-1 (Materials Board). These are as follows:
Use & Material
Col or
Main Wall Tiles
Accent Band Tiles
Black Anodized Mullions
Blue Reflective Glass
Built up Roof
Accent Column Tiles
Pavers
YM 155/1BG ]2
YM 155/1BG 16
Black
Royal Blue
Light Gray
Cherry Red D-101
Ironspot
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to planning Department approval.
One (1) trash enclosure which is adequate to enclose a total of two (2)
bins shall be located within the project, and shall be constructed prior
to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in
PLOT PLAII NO. 11499, /~!. ~1
Conditions of Appromal
Page 4
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
height and shall be made with masonry block and a gate which screens the
bins from external view.
Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height
of six (6) feet.
All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved
wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated
or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical
plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check
approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan
'This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to
issuance of any building permit by the Riverside County Department of
Building and Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall
certify that the intended structure or building is safe and structurally
integrated. This certification shall be based upon, but not be limited
to, the site specific seismic, geologic and geotechnical conditions.
Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development is determined to exist,
appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated."
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is
based on the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development.
Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
Five (5) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient location:
to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
Prior to the issuance of building permtts, performance securities, in
amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance
with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one
year, shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape
planttng and irrigation shall have been Installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Director of Butldtng and Safety. The plants shall be
healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall
be properly constructed and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be
installed underground.
Prior to any use allowed by this plot plan, the applicant shall obtain
clearance fron the I)epartment of Building and Safety - Land Use Section
that the uses found on the subject property are in conformance with
Ordinance No. 348.
PLOT PLM #0. 11499, ~md. ~1
I:ondtttons af Appraval
Page 5
34. All of the foregoing conditions shall be conplied with prior to occupancy
or any use allowed by this permit.
JR:jg
4/12/90
KENNETH L EDWARDS
C~lr EN~N~ER
1995 MARKET STREET
P.O. BOX ~033
TELEPHONE (714) 787-201S
FAX NO. (714) 788-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 9='502
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. ~
P1 anner Jo~ ,,~t~ ~,
Re:
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
]B inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The Distrtct's report dated (~cTa~et/~? is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
lhis project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~avJhb~e~r°ject will be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
Very, truly yourS,
JOHN H. KASHUBA
Senior Civil Engineer
KENN~T'H L. El)WARDS
CH~Ir L~IGINEER
1995 MARKET STREET
P.O. BOX $033
TEI. EPHONE (714) 787-2015
FAX NO. (71,4) 788-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
P1 anntng Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, Ca1 tfornia
Attention: Regional_.Team
Planner JOllY
Area:
Re: PP 11¢
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. lhe natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~les and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The Oistrict's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of pjx~ /~g_~L~_ The project will be
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements l~ave been constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
truly yours,.
Hn~oHr' c~vA~U~nAg i neer
DATE: C~c.~ [{~, ('~ B c~
T__he County Bo.ard of Supervisors has adopted the
7A'~W~6/~ ~lJ~,/ Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of
collecting drainage fees. Those ~ees are used to construct
nee~e~ flood control facilities w~thin the particular area. The
Area Drainage Plan fees apply to new land divisions and other
types of new development.
¥irtually all new development causes increased storm runoff.
These increases are particularly troublesome in those watersheds
where an Area Drainage Plan has been adopted. In order to miti-
gate the downstream impacts brought about by increased runoff,
the District recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans
and Public Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation
charge. Mitigation charges, where appropriate, will be similar
to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate.
Following is the District's recommendation:
A flood mitigat~on charge sha}l be paid. The charge shall
equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied
by the area of new development. The new development in this
case includes a total of ~.~.+~ acres. At the current
fee rate of $ ~ ~ per acre, the mitigation charge
equals $ ~S.~ ' · The charge is payable to the Flood
Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full
Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Mitigation Charge
(mitcharg)
County of Riverside
TO: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
?
ATTN: John Ristow
DATE:
Ocrnhor ~, !qRq
· ~OM: gAN ~ARTTN~, ~NVTRnN~FNTAI. ~A~ $p~c~!iST IV
RE: PLOT PLAN 11~99
Fl."
Envtromaenta! Health Services has reviewed the above ploc
plan and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services
are available in this area. Prior to any building plan
submittals, viii-serve letters from the water and severing
agencies will be required.
SH:tac
GEN. FORM 4, (Rev. 8/8?)
County of Riverside
TO:
FROM:
RE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: January 12, 1990
NHENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST IV
PLOT PLAN 11699, AliIENDED NO. 1
Environmental Health Services has reviewed A~ended No. 1
dated December 17, 1989. Our current comments will remain
as stated in our memo dated October 3, 1989.
SM:tac
J~IN 1 8 1990
RIVERSIDE
PLANNIN(~ r~r.~I~._UNTY
t;I..N. ¥tlIIM 4. ~!(.., ' ~71
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
LeRoy D. Smoot
January 26, 1990
COUNIY AD~41NI~lRA1 IV[ CI N! I
M&ILJ'~f~ AI K)RI3,S
P.O ~.)X lug()
RIVERSIDE CAUIORNL~, 92502
(714) ?B?.6554
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
(Bank/Commercial Office]
Plot Plan 11499
Team 5 - SMD #9
AP 9111-111-111-9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the traffic
study for the above referenced project. The traffic study has
bccn prepared in accordance with accepted traffic engineering
standards and practices, utilizing County approved guidelines. We
generally concur with the findings relative to traffic impacts.
The study indicates a projected Level of Service "C" at
Enterprise Circle North/Winchester Road. The Comprehensive
General Plan circulation policies relative to Category II Land
Uses states: 'A minimum of Level of Service "C" is necessary for
any new Category II land use." As such, the proposed project is
consistent with this General Plan policy.
The following conditions of approval incorporate mitigation
measures identified in the traffic study which are necessary to
achieve or maintain the required level of service:
Prior to issuance of a building permit or 'any use allowed
by this permit, the applicant shall submit a striping and
signing plan that conforms to the following geomet~cs for:
a)
Jefferson/Winchester: two northbound through lanes, one
northbound right turn lane, one northbound left turn
lane, one sout}~ound through lane, one southbound right
turn lane, two southbound left turn lanes, three
eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane,
one eastbound left turn lane, two westbound through
lanes, one westbound right turn lane, and two westbound
left turn lane.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER * 4080 LEMON STREET * RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
January 26, 1990
Page 2
b)
1-15 S.B. Ramp/Winchester: one southbound right turn
lane, one southbound left turn lane, two eastbound
through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane, ans two
westbound through lanes.
c)
1-15 N.B. Ramp/Winchester.' one northbound right turn
lane, two northbound left turn lanes, one eastbound
through lane, one eastbound left turn lane, two
westbound through lanes, and one westbound right turn
lane.
The applicant shall provide any widening necessary to
implement such, as approved by the Road Commissioner, all
at no cost to any government agency.
With respect to the
referenced Item, the
recommendationst
conditions of approval for
Road Department has the
the above
following
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this
permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at
no cost to any government agency=
No additional right of way shall be required on Winchester
Road and Enterprise Circle North since adequate right of
way exists.
Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed
by this permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Road Department the sum of $3,450.00
towards mitigating traffic impacts for signal require-
ments.
This amount represents 1.38 acres x $2,500.00 per gross
acre = $3,450.00.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the
applicant shall construct the following at no cost to any
government agency~
e
Winchester Road shall be improved with concrete curb and
gutter located 38 feet from centerline and match up asphalt
concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing
paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 50
foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with
County Standard No. 101.
Enterprise Circle North shall be improved with 34 feet of
asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width
dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard
No. 111. (28'/39')
Plot Plan 11499
January 26, 1990
Page 3
®
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Asphalt emulsion (fog sea1) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
Standard 35 foot curb return, cross
access ramps shall be constructed
Ordinance 461 where applicable.
gutter, spandrel and
in accordance with
The landdivider will provide a left turn lane on Winchester
Road at the intersection with Enterprise Circle North as
approved by the Road Department.
Six foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along
Winchester Road and Enterprise Circle North in accordance
with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk).
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of
road improvements does not imply acceptance for main-
tenance by County.
Major drainage is involved on this project and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Commissioner.
Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section
11.1.
All work done within County right of way shall have an
encroachment permit.
All driveways shall
County Standards
improvement plans.
conform to
and shall
the applicable Riverside
be shown ~n the street
All entrance driveways shall be channelized with concrete
curb and gutter to prevent "back-on" parking and interior
drives from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum
distance of 35 feet measured from face of curb.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with PM 19582-2 and PP 10433.
Street lights shall be installed in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads
constructed or improved within the development. The County
P]o~ P]an 11499
January 26, 1990
Page 4
18.
19.
20.
21.
Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the
development is within an existing assessment district. If
not, the land owner shall file after receiving tentative
approval, for an application with LAFCO for annexation into
or creation of a County Service Area in pursuant to
~overnmental Code Section 56000 et. seq.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this project shall be coordinated with this
project and shown on the street improvement plans.
A striping plan is required for Winchester Road. The
removal of the existing striping shall be the
responsibility of applicant. Traffic signing and striping
shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs
borne by the applicant.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Road Department standards and require approval
by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape
plans shall be submitted on standard County Plan sheet
format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted
with the street improvement plans and shall depict Qnly
such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are
to be placed within the public road rights-of-way.
The applicant shall provide evidence of a reciprocal
easement for the shared driveway, ingress and egress.
cere ly,
Road Division Engineer
LT, Jw '
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
46-Z0~ OASIS STREET, SUITE 405
INDIO, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WI.[H THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMEN'[ OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
{;!.I:N .I. N!:.WKIAN
FIRE Ct!IEF
April 11, 1990
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
3760 12TH STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
(714) 787.6606
TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JOHN RISTOW
PLOT PLA~ 11499 - AMENDED4H.'~
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding t~e above referenced
plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection
measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or
recognized fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the
remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure
established in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1750 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure which must
be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire hydrant
(6"x4"x2½x2½), located not less than 25 ft. or more than 165 ft. from
any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways.
The applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written certification
from the water company noting the location of the existing fire hydrant
and that the existing water system is capable of delivering 1750 GPM fire
flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If
a water system currently does not exist, the applicant/develo~~ shall
be responsible to provide written certification that financial arrangements
have been made to provide them.
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow
requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil
engineer and the local water company with the following certification:
"I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with
the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department."
RE: PP 11499 Page 2
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 CPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement
that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be
included on the title page of the building plans.
Install a supervised water flow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as per
Uniform Building Code.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated
into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per
Section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code.
9. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered
must appear on the title page of the building plans.
10. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
11. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
12. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
13.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00 to
the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
14.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25¢ per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
15. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in
Building and Safety.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
Administrative Center * 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
January 16, 1990
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: John Ristow
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Plot Plan 11499, Exhibit A, Amended #1
JAN 1 B 1990
RIVEI~IDE OOUNTY
PLANNINO DEPARTMENT
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site
signage will be required.
If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department
the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division
concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review.
Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B,
per Ordinance 655.
Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety
review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning
Department must be attached.
Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping
may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval.
Prior to the. issuance of building permits, written clearance
is required from the following:
° Temecula Unified School District
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
conform with an approved floor plan indicating the maximum
number of tenants allowed. Each space shall be labeled with
a number or a letter.
Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020
Planning Department
PP 11499
January 16, 1990
Page 2
Where no specific uses for proposed structures are indicated,
Building and Safety may require additional Planning Department
approvals.
Yours truly,
Land Use Technician
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
PLANNING JOHN ,RISTOW
WENDY PARKER
January 12, 1990
P. P. tl 499
RIVER61DE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site.
The plan is acceptable. ConseQuently, the "Grading Section" recommends
approval of this project if the following conditions are included.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from
the Building and Safety Department,
Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall
oDtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and
Safety Department.
Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will reauire performance security
to be posted with the Building and Safety department.
Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will reouire performance security
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information
form Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86,
and 284-46. Thank you.
:livr-:DiDr- ¢OU11[.u
i'LAllnin( D PA:I[liIF. n[
leb~'uar'y 4. 198il
Pioneer Consul tants
251 Tennessee Street
Redlands, California 92373
Attention:
Mr. Michael C. Shea
Mr. Kyle O. Emerson
SUBJECT:
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone
J.N. 2067-002
Parcel Map 19582-2
County Geologic Report No. 457
Rancho California Area
Gen tl emen:
We have reviewed your report entitled "Geological Investigation of the Wildomar
Fault, Parcel Flap 19582-2, Rancho California area, Riverside County, CA," dated
October 19, 1987, and your addendum report dated January 6, 1988.
Your report determined that:
Active traces of the Wildomar Fault have been found to trend through the
site at the locations shown on the grading plans, Exhibits 2A and 2B, and
the trench logs, Exhibits 3A, 3B, 3C and 3E.
2. Active faulting is confined to a distinct and well defined zone g to 54
feet wide centered on the western flanks and toe of the distinct
topographic escarpment trending northward along the proposed Enterprise
Circle North and the western margin of Lot 13.
3. No other faults were found on-site over the entire width of the
Alqutst-Pr.tolo Special Studies Zone.
No other geologic hazards are anticipated to affect the future development
of the site, except for liquefaction potential which is being addressed in
a separate report.
4080 LEMON STREET. 9'" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
(.714) 78743181
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
Pioneer Consultants
-2-
February 4, 1988
Your report recommended that:
A butld)ng setback zone should be established on the site which will
contain all known active traces of the Wildomar Fault through on the site.
Width of the setback zone will vary from 85 to 155 feet as shown on Exhibit
2A.
All recent backfill placed in the trenches should be recompacted during
grading as per the reco~wnendations of the soils 'engineer.
It ts our opinion that the report was prepared tn a competent manner consistent
with the present "state-of-the-art' and satisfies the requirements of the
Alqutst-Prtolo Special Studies Zones Act, associated Riverside County Ordinance
No. 547, and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Final approval
of this report is hereby given.
We recoffwnend that the following conditions be satisfied before issuance of any
County permits associated with this project: ·
lea
The Building Setback Zone shown on the Geological Hap (Exhibits 2A and 2B)
in the report shall be delineated on the Environmental Constraints Sheet
(E.C.S.). The areas within the Building Setback Zone shall be labeled
'FAULT HAZARD AREA." This zone shall supercede the previous setback zone
shown on the E.C.S.
The following revised notes shall be placed on the E.C.S.:
e
(a)
'This property is affected by earthquake faulting. Structures for
human occupancy shall not be allowed in the Fault Hazard Area. This
constraint affects parcel numbers 12 through 16 and 26.'
(b)
'County Geologic Report No. 457 was prepared for this property on
October lg, 1987 by Pioneer Consultants, and is on file at the
Riverside County Planning Department. Specific items of concern
are as follows: earthquake faulting, seismic design of
structures, and liquefaction."
Notes 2(a) and 2(b) above shall also be placed on the final Parcel Map with
the following addition to Note No. 2(a) ' as shown on the accompanying
Environmental Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the
office of the Riverside County Surveyor.'
A copy of the final map and Environmental Constraints Sheet shall be
submitted to the Planning ~epartment Engineering Geologist for review and
approval.
Pioneer Consu 1rants
-3-
February 4, ],988
This report supercedes the previous fault hazard Investigation prepared for
this project by Pioneer Consultants tn 1980. Thts report is also referred to
as County Geologic Report No. 199
Very truly yours.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARJENT
Roger S. StFeeter - Pl~)/~nir)/D)/~/ector
Engineering Geolog,st/ /
SAK: rd
c.c Csaba Ko California Development Co. /,
Joe McGee - Hawkins, Robertson & Assoc.
Norm Lostborn - Building & Safety (2)
Earl Hart - COMG
Planning, Central Files
?L, IlI'I;I'IG
February 5, 1988
Pioneer Consultants
251 Tennessee Street
Redlands, CA 92373
Attention: Mr. Nicholas Z. Selmeczy
Hr..David W. Turner
SUBJECT:
Liquefaction Hazard
J. N. 2067-002
Parcel ~p 19582-2
County Geologic Report No. 457L
Rancho California Area
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Geotechntcal
Engineering Report, Parcel Hap 19582-2, Rancho California, CA," dated
October 19, 1987, and your response letter dated January 18, 1988.
Your report and response determined that:
There is a liquefaction potential in the subsoils which would have an
effect on the proposed development on Lots 5 through 12 and 21 through 26.
There is also a potential for soil liquefaction in the remaining lots, but,
because of the depth of the potentially ltqueftable layers, the proposed
fill placement on the parcels and/or the relatively high fines content
(silt and clay) of the near-surface soils, soil liquefaction should not
have an effect on the proposed development. These are lots 1 through 4 and
13 through 20. ~
Settlement or loss of bearing capacity for proposed structures induced by
sot1 liquefaction in the near surface soils is not anticipated if the
recommendations made in your report are followed.
The deeper soils underlying the 10 foot thick well compacted layer may
experience liquefaction, and in turn a minor amount of ground subsidence
may be induced by the denstftcatton effect of liquefaction. This potential
liquefaction of the deeper lying soil layers will not produce intolerably
large differential settlements in the proposed structures.
4. The potential of lateral spreading due to sot1 liquefaction adjacent to the
proposed stream channel is considered minimal.
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
Ptoneer Consul rants
-2-
February 5, 1988
5. There is a potential that on certain lots where the soils are prone to
1tquefy, storage tanks buried in the ground may get damaged.
Your report and response recommended that:
For Lots S through 12 and 21 through 26, a sufficiently thick layer of
nonltqueftable sot1, that is, compacted fill below the foundation elevation
of the proposed buildings, should be provided. The required thickness of
this layec.should be equal to or greater than two times the width of the
proposed foundations Assuming that the foundation depth wtll be 1tmited
to not more than two feet and the footing width to not more than four feet,
the thickness of the nonltqueftable layer should be at least 10 feet below
proposed finish grade. This nonltqueftable layer can be provided by either
placement of compacted fill and/or removal and replacement of the existing
sotls as compacted f111 to the required depth.
Additional analysis should be performed concerning the effect of soil
liquefaction on underground storage tanks. This should be based on the
particular circumstances and design at the time when the basic design
information becomes available.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner and
satisfies the additional information requested under the California
Environmental Quality Act review and the Riverside County Comprehensive General
Plan.
We recommend that the followthg note be placed on the Parcel Map prior to its
recordation: 'County Geologtc Report No. 457L was prepared for this property
on October lg, lg87, by Pioneer Consultants and is on file at the Riverside
County Planntng Department. The specific items of interest are liquefaction
and seismic design of structures."
Vary truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING D~EPARTMEpT
Rog.e~r._S. $~treeter - Plannffg DireCtor
Steven A. Kupferman / /- /
Engineering Geologts~ / /
CEG-120S
SAK:rd
c.c. Csaba Ko - Rancho California Development Co.
Joe McGee - Hawkins, Robertson & Assoc.
Norm Lostbom - Building & Safety (2)
Planning Central Files
:liVEq iDE courl;u.
PLAIIIlilIG DEi :t;lilEIIC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (Ek) NUMBER: O ~ ~IC~
PROJECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(s):
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING Ek:
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
STANDARD EVALUATION
MODULE NUMBER(s):
A. ~IPTION (Include prol~os~d min, lmum lot size and u~ea ~s ~oplicable):
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES * -~ '~ ; or SQUARE FEET
C..~,.%.~=.~,SOR'S PARCEL NO.(s):
D. EXISTING ZONING: /~-- .~
E. PROPOSED ZgNING:
F. STREET REFERENCES:
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?/~'L~-,
IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
G. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Ho
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVlRONI~EN'rAL SETTIN.G OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS
,...-, ,,' _...:- ,, .
,s
~~ I · ~ _( (£ COr~.r~,.4 I/Z C ~ eL...
E. COblPR~ GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check Ihe al:qXoprlate option(s) below and ~oc:eed accordingly.
,~AII or ~ of Ihe project lite le in "Adopted Specific Plans," "REMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community
Policy Ames". Complete Sections III, IV (B and C only), V and Vl.
r"l All or ~ of the p~t aite is in "Areas Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV
(A, B and D only), V and Vl.
I"1 All or I~rl of the project site has an Open Space and Conservation designation other than those mentioned
above. Complete .Sections III, IV (A, B, and E only), V and Vl.
¥. INFORMATION ~UtlCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MF.A~URE$ (continued)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
Z,~ ,'s t~c~ ~),v/~,, ~/~_.. /14,,.,~-,~.,~/t~' (~.~_/-.."
~ ENVlIIONMENTAL liPACT DETERMINATION:
The projecl will not have a Ngnificant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration may be
Ior)
The ixoject oould have I significanl elfeel on tha environment; however, Ihere wtll nol be a significanl
effect in lhtl ca~e becauee the mitigation measures described in Section V have been applied to the
I:XOject and I Negative Declaration may be prepared.
The project may have/e~gniftca~ effect on the environment and an Environmental ImDac! Fiepot1
~ /
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
DEPT '0~
TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION
SIGNS- BALLOONS
It is recommended the City Council consider a proposal of the
Commerce Committee to change advertising sign regulations; and
refer to City Attorney to prepare amendments, or
refer to City Manager for further study, or
reject request and direct City Manager
ordinance.
O)
(2)
(3)
DEPT HD.
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
Temecula
to enforce current
BACKGROUND
County Ordinance 348 and 457 regulate advertising displays in Temecula.
Ordinance 348 prohibits any advertising sign without a permit. It prohibits any
display above the roof line of a building. It prohibits moving signs.
Temporary signs are not specifically mentioned except for political signs,
subdivision signs and for sale signs, which are allowed under limited conditions.
On May 15, 1990, the County Department of Building and Safety sent letters to
businesses displaying balloons being used for advertising. Owners were asked to
abate the balloons.
On May 16, 1990, the City acted to remove illegal signs within the public right-
of-way.
On May 29, 1990, a delegation known as the Temecula Commerce Committee
met with the City Manager to protest enforcement of the sign ordinance and
indicated their intention to request City Council action to change the ordinance.
On May 29, 1990, the City Manager requested the County to suspend further sign
enforcement activities in order to allow the Temecula Commerce Committee to
make a presentation to the City Council.
The Temecula Commerce Committee has filed a report for Council agenda June
26, 1990. After considering the Committee's request, Council needs to give
direction to staff.
The City now has a Code Enforcement Officer employed as city staff, and he will
be directed to enforce whatever ordinance the Council endorses.
TEMECULA COMMERCE COMMITTEE
June 19, 1990
Mr. Frank Aleshire
City Msnsger, City of Temsculs
P.O. Box 3000
Temsculs, CA 92390
Dear Mr. Aleshire,
Attscbed you will find our proposal for an amendment to
Temscula's interim sign ordinance which allows for ambient
balloons as s temporary form of on-site outdoor advertising.
I believe you will find our proposal to be quite reasonable in
,cope and rationale.
We request that our presentation of this proposal be presented
before the City Council on Tuesday, June 26. Please place this
topic of discussion on your scheduled agenda for this particular
date.
Your assistance on our behaff is much apprsclated.
If you have any further questions please give me a call at 676-
5611.
(~;8~hCerelY' ~- n C. Bell
Cbeirman
P.O. BOX 564
TEMECULA, CA 92390
DEDICATED TO MOLDING A CITY OF PROSPERITY
PZ~&L ~ AZ,m'l~l~ TO ~ ~l~ OI~ZIt&NCE
ZItCO~OZULTZ~ ~ZEI~T B&LZ,00~S ~ Z~ ACCF~TA~.,Z FOI~ OF OUTDOOR
ADVF.~TZ~~
l'L'elmEod by: Temoc,*d].a Ccgmo=oo Ccmm:i.t:toe (TCC)
D&~:o: d'm:le 2.9, 2.990
To Be P=eoon~od b£oz'e C:Lty Coun~::i.].: June 26, 2.990
INTRODUCTION:
With the advent of Temecula's Balloon and Wine Festival
and the growing popularity of hot air ballooning as a
recreational sport in our valley, the words Temecula and
hot-air balloons have become almost synonymous.
As a result, Temecula has unofficially been labeled, by
many, as "The Balloon Capital of Southern California".
Merchants have capitalized on Temecula's festive image
by tastefully incorporating colorful balloons into their
business logos, billboards, brochures, and on-site
advertising.
With the exception of subdivision signs, political signs
and "for sale lease or rent signs", Temecula's interim
sign ordinance does not provide a vehicle in which
merchants can apply for temporary forms of outdoor
adve~ising.
Note: Temecula's current codes pertaining to
"Outdoor Advertising Displays" are being
administered and enforced using the guidelines
set forth in Riverside County's Ordinance 348.
Ordinance 348 was adopted by the City of
Temecula as an interim ordinance, and will
remain in force and amended until such time
Temecula's long range General Plan is
developed and approved. A material part of
the General Plan will be criteria used to
regulate all forms of signage within the City
of Temecula.
Given the existing ordinance, the City currently has no
choice but to disallow balloons as a permissible form of
advertising.
As merchants and residents of Temecula, we do not believe
that our city's ordinance should be an "all or nothing"
situation when it comes to balloon advertising.
Therefore, it is our objective to propose a reasonable
amendment to County Ordinance 348. An amendment that
maintains Tamecula's balloon image and beautiful skyline
while at the same time providing an affectire and
tasteful form of on-site advertising.
~okoo~nd ~.o Proposal
Upon researching several southern California cities said to allow
balloons in their signage ordinances, we found the following local
cities to permit the same:
1. San Marcos
2. Escondido
3. Vista
4. Oceanside
5. Corona
6. City of Industry
In each of the above examples, we found that "ambient balloons"
were defined as "temporary signs" and were regulatedunder "special
provisions" of each city's particular master sign ordinance (refer
to Appendix A).
In addition, we found that the regulations pertaining to balloons
varied with respect to time and size limitations, amount of
required fees, the number of inflatables used, and the materials
from which the balloons are to be constructed from.
Formulation of Proposal
In formulating our proposal, we used the ordinances of the
aforementioned cities as our amendingguildline. By incorporating
these guildlinesand definitions into Temecula's current ordinance,
we derived the following draft as a basis for our amendment
proposal:
ARTICLE XlX
ADVERTISING REGULATIONS
SECTION lg.1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. Because Riverside County is a large,
diverse and rapidly expanding jurisdiction the Board of Supervisors finds tnmt
proper sign control Is necessary to provide for the preservation and protection
of open space and scenic areas, the many natural and man-made resources, and
established rural cam,unities within Riverside County. ]t is the intent of
this ordinance to provide standards to safeguard life, health. property and the
public welfare. to provtde the means for adequate Identification of businesses
and other sign users by prohibiting, regulating and controlling the design.
locatton and maintenance of stgns, and to provide for the rmoval and
limitation of use of signs within the unincorporated area of Riverside County.
All outdoor advertising displays and on-site advertising structures and signs
in the unincorporated area. of the County of Riverside shall conform to the
applicable provisions of this article. If any specific zoning classification
within this ordinance shall impose more stringent requtrments than are set
forth within this article, the more stringent provisions shall prevail.
~ended Effective:
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
SECTION 19.2. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this ordinance, the following
-.words or phrases shall have the following definitions.
'Outdoor Advertising Display' means outdoor advertising structures and
outdoor advertising signs used for outdoor advertising purposes, not
including on-site advertising signs as hereinafter defined. An
outdoor advertising display may be con~nonly known or referred to as an
'off-site" or an off-pr~ntses' billboard.
'Outdoor Advertising Structure' means a structure of any kind or
character erected or maintained for outdoor advertising purposes, upon
which any poster, bill, printing, painting or other advertisement of
any kind whatsoever may be placed, including statuary, for outdoor
advertising purposes. Such structure shall be constructed Or~ereCte-~
upon a permanent foundation or shall be attached to a structu having
a permanent foundation.
'Outdoor Advertising Sign' means any card, cloth, paper, metal,
painted, plastic or wooden sign of any character placed for outdoor
advertising purposes, on or to the ground or any tree, wall, bush,
rock, fence, building, structure or thing, either privately or
publicly owned, other than an advertising structure.
The words 'Outdoor Advertising Structure" and 'outdoor Advertising
Sign' as defined in subsections (b) and (c) do not include:
X. Official notices issued by any court or public body or officer;
242
e
j~l~ding stgns necessary for the operation and safety of public
utility uses.
A structure erected near a city or county boundary, which contains
the name of such city or county and the names of, or any other
information regarding, civic, fraternal or religious organizations
located therein.
"On-~tte Advertising Structure and Signs' means any structure,
housing, sign device, figure, statuary, painting, display, message
placard, or other contrivance, or any part thereof, which is designed,
constructed, created, engineered, intended, or used to advertise, or
to provide data or Information tn the nature of advertising, for any
of the following ~urposes:
(1) To designate, identify, or tndtcate the name of the business of
the owner or occupant of the praises upon which the Structure or
Sign ts located.
(Z) To advertise the business conducted, services available or
rendered, or the goods produced, sold, or available for sale.
upon the praises where the structure or sign is located.
portab].o m:Lgn, k-,am-., b&l.X~n, l:~Unant, v.Ll. anom, or &dvoFb4s:Lng
d.t~.ay ~ated o£ c~l.o~h, ff. anvum, X4ght £~b~:i.o,
oi~'xlx:xBz'd, voJ. Zboazd, o= ot:ho= XXght: mat~m=XLl. o, trJ.~h o=
fEBmOO, Xntondocl t:o be dJ. lrpXmymd £oz~ · XXud. tod po=Xod o£ t:Xme
f. "Freeway' means a divided arterial highway for through traffic with
full control of access and with grade separations at intersections.
· Highway' Beans roads, streets, boulevards, lanes, courts, places,
canons, tratls, ways or other rights-of-way or easehanes used for or
laid out and intended for the public passage of vehicles or of
vehicles and persons.
'Edge of a Right-of-way' means a measurenent from the edge of a
right-of-way horizontally along a line normal or perpendicular to the
centerline of the freeway or highway.
"Maximum Height' means the highest point of the structure or sign
measured fram the average natural ground level at the base of the
supporttng structure.
Jo
"Free Standing Sign' means any sign which ts supported by one or more
columns or uprights imbedded in the ground, and which is not attached
to any building or structure.
"Surface Area" Beans that area of outdoor advertising signs and
on-site advertising signs as measured by the smallest geometric fob
such as a square, rectangle, triangle, or circle, or combination
thereof, which will encompass the face of the sign on which the
message Is displayed.
243
"For Sale, Lease or Rent $tgn' means a stgn advertising that the
property or structure upon which the stgn ts located ts for sale,
lease, or rent.
'Shopping Center' means e parcel of land not less than 3 acres in
stze, on which there exists 4 or more separate bust hess uses that have
mutual parktng facilities.
'Directional Sign' means a stgn used to direct and control vehicular
or pedestrian traffic that is located upon the same parcel of land as
the use that tt ts triteholed to serve.
o. 'Significant Resources" means any county, state or federal site whtch
has significant or potentially significant soctal, cultural,
historical, archaeological, recreational or scentc resources, or which
plays or potentiaily could play e significant role tn pramottng
tourism. For the purposes of thts arttel,, the ten. significant
resources shall Inclucia, but not be 1tatted to, the following:
Riverside #attohal Cmetery. A strip, 660 feet tn wtdth, measured
frm the edge of the right-of-way 1the on both stdes of 1-215 fro.n
the intersection of Van Buren Boulevard southerly to Nance Road,
and on both sides of Van Burart Boulevard from the tritersection of
Z-21S westerly to blood Road.
2. scentc fltghways.
3. A corridor $00 feet in width adjacent to both stales of
highways withtn three-tenths (3/10) of amtle of any Regional,
State or Federal park or recreation area.
'Scenic Htghway' means any officially designated state or county
scenic highway as defined in Streets and Highway Code Sections 154 and
261 et seq.
'Illegal Outdoor Advertising Display' means
(2)
(3)
any of the fol 1 owl ng:
An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertistn~ sign
erected without first complying with all applicable county
ordinances end regulations in effect et the time of its
construction, erection or use.
An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign that
wes legally erected but ~hose use has ceased, or the structure
upon which the advertising display is placed has been abandoned
by its o~ner, and not maintained or used for e period of not less
then one (1) year.
An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign that
was legally erected which later became nonconforming ms a result
of the adoption of an ordin&nce$ the ~ortizetion period for the
display provided by the ordinance rendering the display
nonconfomtng has exptre~; and conromance has not been
accmpl t shed.
(4) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
which does not cmply with the Notice of Decision or the approved
plot plan.
244
(s)
(6)
An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
whtch is a danger to the publtc or ts unsafe as ma~ be determined
b~, the Otrector of the Buildtrig and Safet~ Department.
An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising stgn
whtc~ ts a traffic hazard as ma~ be determined b~, the Director of
the Bullcling and Safet~ Oeparl~ent provtded satd trafftc hazard
was not created b~ the tel,cation of streets or htghwa~s or
acts of the Count~.
r. "Illegal On-Stte Advertising Structure or Sign" means an~ of the
fo11 owt rig.
(1) An on-stte advertising structure or stgn erected without first
cmpl~lng with all applicable Coun~ ordinances and regulations
effect at the tlne of 1rs construction, erection or use.
(2) An on-site &dyerrising structure or stgn that was 1ega11~
erectmalt but whose uses has ceased. or the structure upon which
the advertising dtspla~ ts placed has been abandoned b~ 1rs
owner. and not maintained or used to tdenttf~ or advertise an
ongotng busthess for a pertod of not less than ntnet~ (90) da~,s.
(3) An on-stte advertising structure or stgn that was lega11~ erected
whtch later bec&le nonconfomtng as a result of the adoptton of
an ordinance; the ~orttzation pertod for the dtspla~ provided b~
the ordinance rendering the dtspla~, nonconforming has expired;
and conromance has not been accomplished.
(4) An on-stte advertising structure or stgn whtc.~ ts a danger to the
publlc or ts unsafe as ma~, be determined b~ the Dtrector of the
Butldtng and Safet~ Department.
(5) An on-site advertising structure or sign whtch ts a traffic
hazard as ma.v be datemined b.y the Director of the Butldtng and
Safety, Department provided satd traffic hazard was not created b~
the tel.cation of streets or htghwa),s or b~ acts of the Count~.
Se
"Abandoned" means etther:
An~, outdoor advertising clispla~, that 1s allowed to continue for
more than one (1) ~ear wtthout a poster, bt11, printing,
painting, or other fore of adverttsment or message; or
(2) An~ outdoor advertising dtspla~ that does not appear on the
tnventor~ requtred b.v Section 19.3.a.(25); or
(3) An~ on-site advertising 's~.ructure or stgn that ts allowed to
continue for more than ntnet? (90) da~s ~lthout a poster, bill,
printing, painting, or other form of advertising or message for
the purposes set forth tn Sectton ~zg.Z.e hereof.
/~ended Effecti re:
07-16-85 (Oral. 348.Z496)
06-Z0-89 (Ord. 348.Z989)
SECTZON 29.3. OUTDOOR ADVERTISZNG DISPLAYS. No person shall erect or
matntatn an outdoor advertising cltspla~ tn the unincorporated area of the
Count~ of Riverside, except tn accordance wtth the following provisions.
245
The changtrig of an advertising message or customary maintenance of a
legally extsttng outdoor advertising titsplay shall not requtre e~' permit
pursuant to thts sectton.
Standards.
I. Zontng. Outdoor advertising crisplay are pemttted only tn the
C-~/C-P: Iq-SCo~lq-14 and H-H zones and providing only that .the
titsplay meets all of the other requlce~ents of the zontng
classification and this arttcle. Outdoor advertising allsplays are
expressly, prohibited In all other zones.
2. Spactng. No outdoor advertising dtspl~y shall be located wtthtn
ftve hundred ($00) feet tn any direction from any other outdoor
advertising cltspl~y on the sine stele of the htghway; provided,
however, that tf tn I parttcul&r zone a different tnterval shall
be stated, the spactng tnterval of the particular zone shall
preyat1. No outdoor advertising dtspla~, shall be erected wtthtn
the houndar~ of any significant resource as deft ned tn Sectton
:i9.Z.o. of thts ordinance. No outdoor advertising crisplay shall
be located wtthtn one hundred ftfty (150) feet of properU for
whtch the zontng does not allow advertising cltspla~s provided;
however, that an outdoor advertising dtsplay may be placed ~thtn
one hundred (150) feet of property for whtch zontng does not
displays, tf ~t the ttme an ~pltcatton for an out,or ad~rtistng
~spll~ ~mtt ts ipplted for, t~re ts m extsttng residential
st~c~ or an ~proved butldtng ~mtt for a ~st~nttal
stsctufa ~thtn one ~nd~d ftftl (~SO) feet of ~ 1ocatton of
the p~posed out.or advertising ~spl
3. Hetght. The eaxteum hetght of an outd~r ad~rttstng ~spla~
shall ~t exceed a ~tght of t~nt~-ft~ (gS) feet frm the
road~d of the adjacent fr~wa~ or htgh~a~ to ~tch t~ ~spla~ ts
oriented, or a maxtm~ hetght of t~nt~-ftve (ZS) feet frm the
grade on ~tch tt is const~cted, ~tchever ts g~ater.
4. Poles. A maxtm~ of t~ (~) steel poles a~ allowed for sup~rt
of an ~tdoor advertising ~spla~.
S. ~of ~nts. ~ out.or advertising dtspla~ shall ~ afftxed
or over t~ ~of of any ~tldtng and no..~spla~ shall ~ affixed
to t~ wall of a ~tldtng so that tt projects a~ t~ para~t of
the ~11dtng. For the ~rposes of thts sectton, a mansard st~le
~of shall M coat.red a para~t.
6. ~m~r of Displays. ~ more than one (Z) proposed ~tdoor
advertising dtsplay ~r application shall ~ ~mttted.
7. ~acks. ~ outdoor adverttslng ~splay shall ~ erected ~thin
an established setback or butldtng 1the, or ~thtn road
rtght-of-wa~ 1tries or future road rtght-of-wa~ 1tries as sho~ on
an~ S~ctftc Plan of Hig~a~s. A mtntm~ setback frm the
pro~rt~ 1t~ of o~ (~) foot shall ~ ~qutred.
8. ~r of 0tspla~ Faces. ~ ~re than t~ (Z) ~spl~ faces ~r
outdoor advertising ~spla~ shall ~ ~mttted. Back-to-back and
V-ty~ ~spla~ shall ~ allowed provt~d that t~ a~ on the
sine ~tdoor advertising st~cture and provtded that the V-t~pe
Z46
10.
11.
12.
displays have a separation between display faces of not more than
twenty-five (25) feet.
Lighting and Illumination of Displays. An outdoor advertising
display may be illuminated, unless otherwise specified, provided
that the displays are so constructed that no light bulb, tube,
ftlment, or similar source of tllm~tnatton is visible beyond the
display face. Display making use of lights to convey the effect
of movment or flashing, intermittent, or variable intensity shall
not be permitted. Display shall use the most advanced methods to
insure the most energy efficient methods of display illumination.
Within the Palomar Observatory Special Lighting Area, all displays
shall cmply with the requtrments of Riverside County Ordinance
No. 655.
Display Movment. No outdoor advertising displays shall move or
rotate, TO display any moving and/or rotating parts. No
propellers, flags, or other noise creating devices, and no
architectural ~belltsh~ents which utilize mechanical or natural
forces for motion, shall be permitted. Use of daylight reflective
mater1 els or electronic message boards ustng flashing,
intermittent or moving light or lights is prohibited, provided,
however, that electronic message boards displaying only time
and/or temperature for periods of not less than thirty (30)
seconds is permitted.
Display Face Size. NO outdoor advertising display shall .have a
total surface' area of more than three hundred (300) square feet
Outdoor Advertising Display Permit Required. No person shall '
erect, alter, repair, or relocate any outdoor advertising display
without first obtaining an outdoor advertising di~lay permit
pursuant to Riverside County Ordinance No. 457. outdoor
advertising display permit shall be issued unless and until the
Butlding Director determines that the proposed activity is in
accordance with this Article and Riverside ts in accordance with
this Arttcle and Riverside County Ordinance No. 457, and that the
aouitcant has obtained a valtd State Outdoor Advertising permit.
l~ ld~ttftcatton. No person shall place, erect, or maintain an
outdoor advertising display and no outdoor advertising display
shall be placed, erect, or maintaining. anywhere within the
unincorporated area of Riverside County unless there is securely
fastened thereto and on the front display face thereof, the n~e
of the outdoor advertising titsplay owner in such a manner that the
name is visible frm the highway. Any dtspl~y placed, erected, or
maintained without this identification shall be tiered to be
placed, erected, and maintained in violation of this section.
~4. Mobile Displays. No person shall place maintain, or otherwise
allow a mobile vehicle, trailer, or other advertising display not
permanently affixed to the ground, as defined in Section 19.2.b.
of this ordinance, to be used as an outdoor advertising display.
1~. Display Inventory. In order to evaluate. and assess outdoor
advertt st ng dt splays .4 thtn the unt_ncorporated area of Rtvers t de
County, within one hundred eighty (180) days of the effective date
247
of thts ordinance and on each fifth (S) anniversary after the
effective date of this ordinance, each titsplay canparty ~th
outdoor advertising dtspla~s wtthtn the unincorporated area of
Riverside County shall subntt to the Department of Building and
Safety, a current Inventor~ of the outdoor advertising displays
they currently own and/or matntatn wtthtn the unincorporated area
of Riverside County. Failure to subutt a current or accurate
Inventory shall be damned to be a separate violation of this
ordinance.
qaocd.£iod under Sootion 19.8 o£ tbJ. o o~oe, the above
wL11 aLeply to i11 on-oite temporary 8Lgno.
b. ~)rocesstng Procedure. I
1. R~pl~Lcal:J. on. Tn additJ. on t.o all other applJ. cab~e Federal,
State, and local lava, rules, regular:Lens and ordinances, no
outdoor advertising. display o: teml~razT outdoor &dvo~41ing
· LspI&F shall be placed or erected until a permit therefore has
been issued by the ~Lty of TomoGqll&, on the form provided by the
Planning DepartJnent accompanied by the filing fee set forth in
OrcLtnance No. 671 and meeting the Requirements of Section 18.30 of
this ordinance. Fees and &pplioation fezes for use of teml~orary
on-site advertis/rig eigzm Gan be found in SeG*tion 19.8 of tJLa.8
ordinance.
.__- Satcf*~lScatton shall also consist of ten (10) copies of a Plot'P1a~-
drawn to scale. containing the nine. address or telephone nanbet
of the appltcant~ · copy of the current valid State Outdoor
Advertising Peruit. end a general description of the property upon
which the outdoor advertising display ts proposed to be placed.
In addition. the appltca,t she11 provide sufficient ~nber of
address labels as deened appropriate by the Planning Director for
411 property owners within a five hundred foot (SO0') radius of
aRY proposed outdoor advertising titsplay. The Plot Plan shall
show the precise location, type, and stze of the proposed outdoor
advertising displays, all property 1tries, zontng, and the
dimensions, location of and otisrance to the nearest a~verttstng
displays, building, bust hess districts, significant resources as
dateruined b.v the ordinance, publlc and prtvate roads, and other
rights-of-way, butldtng setback 1tries, and specifically planned
future road right-of°way 1tries, and any and all other information
requtred by the Planning Otrector tn such a manner that the
proposed display may be readily ascertained, identified, and
evaluated.
Hearing and Notice of Oectston. Upon acceptance of an application
for an outdoor advertising displa~ as canplate, the Planning
Director shall transmtta copy of the application to the
Department of Butldtng and Safety for revtew and caunent.
(a) Not less than thirty (30) days after acceptance of the
application for outdoor adverttstnlt dtspl~y as canplate, the
Planntng Dtrector shall schedule the time and date on which
the Planntng Director's decteton on the application ts to be
earle. Not less than ten (~0) days prior to the date on which
the decteton ts to be made, the Planntng Otrector shall gtve
notice of the proposed outdoor advertising dtspla~, by mail
or dellverT, to all owners shown on the last equalized
assessment roll, and any updates, as owning real property
248
within a five hundred (500) foot radius of the exterior
boundaries of the parcel upon which the proposed outdoor
advertising display is to be located. Notice of the proposed
outdoor advertising display shall also be given by
publication in a newspape.r of general circulation within
Riverside County. The Notice shall include the statement
that no public heartag will be held unless a heartag is
requested, in writing, and delivered to the Planntng Director
at least two (2) days before the dete scheduled for' the
decision is to be made. No public heart rig on the application
for an outdoor advertising display shall be held before a
decision is made by the Planning Director, unless a hearing
ts requested, in writing, by the ~ppltcant or other
Interested person, or if the Planning Director detemtnes
that a public hearing should be required. If no public
hearing ts requested or required, the Planntng Director shall
give the.Notice of Decaston to the applicant and any other
person who h~s made a written request for a copy of the
Notice of Decision. The decision of the Planning Director
shall be considered final unless within ten (lO) days of the
date of mailing of the Notice of Decision to the applicant,
an appeal therefrom is filed.
(b) If a public hearing is required under the provision of this
subsection, notice of the time, date, and place of the
heartag before the Planntng Director and a general
description of the locatton of the real property which is the
subject of the hearing, shall be given at least ten (10) days
rtor to the hearing as follows:
l) Hatltng or delivering to all owners of real property
which ts located within a 500-foot r&dtus of the
exterior boundaries of the percel upon which the
proposed outdoor advertising display ts to be located
as, such owners are shown on the last equalized
assessment roll and any updates.
(2) The Planning Dtrector may require that additional notice
be ~tven tn any other matter the Otrector deems
necessary or desirable.
(c) if a public hearing ts required, the Planntng Director shall
hear relevant testimony fr~m interested persons and make a
decision withtn a reasonable time after the close of the
public hearing. A Notice of Decision shall be filed by the
Planning Director with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors,
not more than fifteen (15) days after the decision. A copy
of the Notice of Decision shall be mailed to the applicant
end to any person who has made & written request for a copy
of the decision. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall
place the Notice of Decision on the next agend~ of the Board
of Supervisors held five ($) or more clays after the Clerk
receives the Notice of Decision frm the Planning Director.
249
e
Appeals. The dectston of the Planntng Dtrector shall be
considered final unless an appeal therefrom ts filed.
(a) Appeals to Planntng Commission. The applicant or any
· triterest person ma~ file an appeal, accmpanted b~, the fee
set forth tn Ordinance No. 67! of this ordinance, and on the
fore provtded b~, the Planntng Department ~lthln ten (10) da.vs
after the #ottce of Dectston Is mailed for those matters
~here a publlc hearing was not requested or requtred or
~tthtn ten (!0) daTs after the gottce of Dectston appears on
the Board of Supervtsor*s agenda. The appeal shall state the
reasons v~y tt 1s belt eyed the action of the Planntng
Director ts traproper. Upon recetpt of a completed appeal end
fee, the Planning Director shall set the matter for heart rig
before the Plannlng ¢ammlsston. Nottee of the hearing on the
appeal shall be gtven tn the same manner that nottce was
tven t~ the same manner that nottce was gtven under !g.3.b
2)(b). The Planntng Commission shall render its dectston on
the appeal ~tthtn ten (10) de~s of the clostng of the
hearing. A #ottce of the Dectston of the Planntng Caratssion
shall be ftled b~ the Planntng Director ~tth the Board of
Supervisors, not more than ftfteen (15) da~s after the
decision. A cop~ of the Nottce of Oectston shall be matled
to the applicant, appellant end to anj, Person ~ho has made a
~rttten request for a cop~, of the decision. The Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors, shall place the Nottce of Dectston on
the next agenda of the Board of Supervisors, held five (5) or
more da~s after the r. lerk receives the Notice of Oectston
from the Planntng Director. The decision of the Planning
Cen~tsslon shall be considered ftnal unless an appeal
therefram ts filed.
(b) Appeals. to Board of Supervisors. The dec, sion of the
Planntng Commission shall be considered ftnal unless an
appeal therefrom ts ftled. The applicant or an Interested
Person may ftle an appeal, accompanied b~ the fee set forth
In Ordinance No. $7! of this ordinance, and on the form
provided b~ the Planning Oepartment wtthtn ten (!0) days
after the Nottee of Oectston of the Planning Commission
appears on the Board of Supervtsors's
agenda. The appeal shall state the reasons ~h.v tt ts
belt eyed the action of the Planntng Canmission ts traproper.
Upon recetpt of a completed appeal end fee, or tf the Board
of Supervisors ass~es :Jurisdiction b~ ordertng the matter
set for publlc heartng, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
shall set the matter for publlc heart rig before the Board of
Supervisors, not less than ftve (5) days nor more than thirt.v
(30) da~s thereafter, and shall gtve nottce of the time and
place of the heart rig tn the same manner as notice of the time
and place of the hearing tn the same manner es nottce was
Itven for the I~.aring .before the Planning Commission. The
oard of Supervisors shall render 1rs dectston wtthtn thirt~
250
Co
(30) da~s folloW rig the close of the heartng on the appeal.
The decision of the Board of Supervisors shall be final.
Revocation. Any outdoor advertising display pemtt ~lJch has
been tssued as a result of a matertel misrepresentation of fact
by the applicant or his agent, ~hether or not a criminal
prosecution ts Initiated therefor, may be summarily revoked by
- the Planning Dtrector ~ho shall forthwith gtve ~Jtten #ottce of
Revocation to the applicant. klfthtn'thfrty (30) days after
nottce ts gtven, any outdoor &dyerrising titsplay authorized
said outdoor advertising ~isplay pemtt she11 be rmoved at the
~ppltcant's expense. Fatlure to rmove the dtspl!y ~Ithtn said
thtrty (30) days she11 be darned a separate violation of thts
ordinance. Nothtng tn this ordinance shall &uthortze the
Installation or maintenance of any outdoor advertising titsplay
~htch ts tn violation of any State or Federal law or regulation.
Enforcment. ~herever the officials responsible for the enforcement
of a~nJntstratton'of the Land Use Ordinance or thetr.. designated
agents, have cause to suspect a violation of this arttcle, or ~henever
necessary to Investigate either an application for the granting,
modification, or any actton to suspend or revoke an outdoor
advertising dtsplay pemJt, or ~henever necessar~ to investigate a
posstble violation, said agents may lawfully gain access to the
appropriate parcel of land upon ~htch satd violation ts belt eyed to
extst. The folloW rig provisions shall apply to the violations of this
arttcle:
1. All violations of- thts article ccemttted by any person, ~hether as
agent, employeeo offtcero principal, or otherwise, shall be a
elsdemeanor.
2. Every person ~ho knowingly preytales' false tnfomatlon on an
outdoor advertising titsplay pemtt application shall be gutlty of
a misdemeanor.
3. Every person ~ho fatls to stop ~ork on an outdoor advertising
titsplay, when so ordered by the Otrector of Building and Safety or
the Planning Director, shall be gutlty of a misdemeanor.
4 Every person ~o, haytrig racet red Nottce to Appear tn court to
answer a related charge, ~11fully fails to appear, shall he gutlty
of a etsdmeanor.
$ A misdemeanor may be prosecuted by the County tn the name of the
. People of the State of California, or may be redressed by civil
actton. Each v~olatJon ts punishable by a fJne of not more than
one thousand dollars (1,000.00), or by tmprJsoment tn the County
Jatl for a tem of not more then six (6) months, or by both fine
and tmpri somehr.
6. Every person found gutlty of a violation shall be deemed guilt~ of
a separate offense for every day during a portton of which the
violation 1s committed, continued, or permitted by such person.
7. Every illegal outdoor advertising display (permanent or
te~mz~zF) and every abandoned outdoor advertising display is
hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to
abatement by repair, rehabilitation, or removal in accordance with
the procedures contained in Section 3 of Riverside County Ordinance
No. 457.
Nonconfomtng Stgns. Ever~ outdoor advertising display w~tch does not
confore to this ordinance shall be deemed to be a nonconfoming sign
and shalt be removed or altered tn accordance with thts ordinance as
fo1 lo~s:
1. Any outdoor advertising display whtch was lawfully tn existence
prior to the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No.
348.2496 (July 16, 1985) shall be abated or brought into
conformance with these provisions by July 17, 1990.
2. Any outdoor advertising display which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No.
348.2856 (June 30, 1988) but after the effective date of the
enactment of Ordinance No. 348.2496 (July 16, 1985) shall be
abated or brought into conformance with these provisions by July
l, 1993.
3. Any outdoor advertising display which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 348.2989 but after
the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No. 348.2856
(June 30, 1988) shall be rebated or brought into conromance with
these provisions within eleven (11)years of the effective date of
Ordinance No. 348.2gBg.
4. If federal or state law requires the County of Riverside to pay
just compensation for the removal of any such lawfully erected but
nonconfomtng outdoor advertising display, it may remain in place
until Just cmpensmtion as defined in the Eminent Domain Law
(Title 7, of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure} is paid.
Illegal and Abandoned Outdoor Advertising Displays. All illegal
outdoor advertising displays and all abandoned outdoor advertising
displays shall be removed or brought into conformance with this
ordinance immediately.
~mended Effecti re:
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
06-30-88 (Ord. 348.2856)
06-20-89 (Ord. 348 2t8g)
252
SECTZON 19.4. ON-S~[TE ADVERTISZNG STRUCTURES AND SIGNS.
NO person shall erect an on-stte advertising structure or sign tn the
unincorporated area of the County of Riverside that 1s tn violation of the
provisions contained ~dthtn any spectftc zontng classification tn thts
ordinance or that ts tn v~olatton of the folloW rig provisions.
a. Free-standing Signs
1. Located w~thtn $$0 feet of the nearest edge of a freeway right of
The maximum height of a sign shall not exceed 4S feet.
The maxtram surface area of a sign shall not exceed lS0
square feet.
2. All Other Locations.
(a) The maximum hetght of a stgn shall not exceed 20 feet.
(b) The maxtram surface area of a stgn shall not exceed $0 square
feet.
3. Shopptng Centers - All Locations.
Notw'ithstaneqng the provisions of sub-paragraphs 1 and 2, an
alternate standard for free standing on-stte adverUstng signs for
shopptng centers ts established as follows:
(a) the maxtmum surface area of a stgn shall not exceed SO square
feet of .25 percent (1/4 of lS) of the total extsttng
butl~ng floor area tn a shopping center, whichever ts
greater, except that tn any event, no sign shall exceed 200
square feet t n surface area.
b. The maxtram hetght of a stgn shall not exceed 20 feet.
4. Number of Free-standing Stgns- All Locations. Not more than one
free-stanoqng stgn shall be pemttted on a parcel of land, except
that tf a shopping center has frontage on 2 or more streets, the
shopping center shall be pemttted 2 free-standing stgns, provided
that the 2 stgns are not located on the sa~e street; are at least
100 feet apart and the second sign does not exceed 100 square feet
~n surface area and 20 feet tn height.
be
Stgns Afftxed to buildings - All Areas
1, No on-site advertising stgn shall be affixed on, above or over the
roof of any bullcffng, and no on-stte advertising stgn shall ~e
afftxed to the wall of a buileqng so t.hat It projects above
parapet of the bull c ting. For the purposes of thts sectton, a
mansard style roof shall be considered a parapet.
2. The maxtram surface area of stgns afftxed to a buildtrig shall be
as fo1 lows:
(a) Front wall of building -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed 10~; of the
surface area of the front face of the building.
(b) Stde walls of a butlding -
The surface area of the stgn shall not exceed 10~ of the
surface area of the side face of the building.
(c) Rear ~all of a butlcfing -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed $~ of the
surface area of the rear face of the building.
253
Directional Stgns- Directional stgns to advtse patrons of location,
distance or purpose shall be pemttted on a parcel of land as follows:
1. The maxtmon hetght of such stgns shall not exceed 3 feet.
2. The maxtmum surface area of such signs shall not exceed 6 square
feet.
On-stte Identification Stgns- On-stte identification signs affixed to
the surface of walls, wtndows, and doors of permanent structures,
~htch do not exceed 4 inches tn letter hetght and do not exceed 4
square feet tn area are pemttted in addttton to any other stgn
pemttted tn this ordinance.
SECTION 19.5. FOR SALE, LEASE OR RENT SIGNS. For sale, lease or rent
stgns shall be permitted to be placed in all zone classifications subject to
the followi ng regulations. '-
1. For one and two fmily residential uses - one sign not exceeding 4
square feet in surface area and not more than 4 feet in height.
2. For multiple fmtly residential uses - one sign for each separate
fronta~ on a street, each sign not to exceed 16 square feet in
surface area and not mre than 8 feet in ~tght.
3. For commercial uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 24 square feet in surface area and
not more than 8 feet tn ~tght.
4. For Industrial uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 3:~ square feet in surface area and
not ~re than 10 feet in height.
$. For agrtcultu~ uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 16 square feet in surface area and
not more than 8 feet in height.
SECTION 19.6 SUBDIVISION SIGNS.
On-site subdivision signs, advertising the original sale of a
subdivision are pemttted within the boundaries of a subdivision, upon
approval of a plot plan pursuant to Section..18.30 of this ordinance
and subject to the following minim~ standards:
1. No sign shall exceed 100 square feet in area.
2. No sign shall be within 100 feet of any existing residence that is
outside of the subdivision boundaries.
3. No more than two such signs shall be permitted for each
subdi vi sion.
4. No sign shall be artificially 11ghted.
be
Off-site subdivision signs advertising the original sale of a
subdivision, shall be permitted in all zone classifications, except
the C-P-S, N-A, and W-I Zones, provided a conditional use permit is
granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.28 of this ordinance,
and subject to the following minimum standards:
1. No sign shall exceed 100 square feet in area.
264
2. NO stgn shall be ~tthtn 100 feet of any extsttng residence.
3. No more than two such signs shall be permitted for each
subdtvtston.
4. The mextmum petted of ttme a stgn may r~atn tn place shall be two
~ears.
5. NO stgn shall be artificially 11ghted.
6. An agreement, secured by a $100 cash bond, shall be executed ~th
the County for each sign, assurtng the removal of the stgn wtthtn
the allowed ttme parted. The bond and agreement shall be filed
~th the Oepartment of But leqng and Safety.
Added:
09o13o73 (Ore. 348.1201)
~ended Effectt re:
01o20o77 (Ord. $48.1S40)
05o27-78 (Ord. 348.1658)
09-25-80 (Oral. 348.18SS)
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
SECT/ON 19.7. Ti~PORARY POLZTZCAL SZGNS.
For the purpose of this oreqnance, a temporary political stgn shall
mean a sign, not other, s, permitted by this ordinance, which
encourages a particular vote in a scheduled election.
be
Not~thstandtng any other provision of this ordinance, temporary
political stgns are pemitted tn all zontng classifications subject to
the followring limitations:
1. No such stgn shall exceed 16 square feet In surface area.
2. No free-standing temporar~ political stgn shall exceed 6 feet in
hei 9hi.
3. No lot shall contain temporary political stgns havtng an aggregate
surface area tn excess of 80 square feet.
No such sign shall artificially lighted.
No such stgn shall : erected or placed more than 90 days prior to
the scheduled electton to which tt pertains.
6. All such signs shall be removed wtthtn 10 da~s after the scheduled
election to which they pertatn, except that a sign erected or
placed for a candidate who prevatls in a primary election may be
eatntafned until 10 days after the ftnal election.
7. No such sign shall be erected, placed or maintained upon any
private property wtthout the consent of the owner, lessee, or
person tn lawful possession of such property.
8. No temporary political sign shall be erected, placed, or mainta~necl
on any publtcly owned tree or shrub or upon the improved portion of
any street or highway right of way which ts used for traffic or
park1 rig.
9. No temporary political sign shall be erected, placed or maintained
so that tt does any of the following:
(a) Mars, defaces, disfigures or damages any public but1~ng,
structure or other property.
(b) Endangers the safety of persons or property.
265
(c) Obscures the mew of any fire hydrant, traffic sign, traffic
s19na1, street sign, or publlc tnfonnational sign.
(d) Blocks motorists' 11nes of stght to areas of vehicular or
perlesir1 an traffi c.
Co
Any tmporary political sign erected, placed or maintained tn
v~olatton of any provisions of thts sectton may be reuoved by the
County $ days after notice of the violation ts gtven to the concerned
candidate or sponsor. end to the owner, lessee or person in lawful
posse.sston of ~the property. Any temporary political sign Mhtch
constitutes an Immediate dan9er to the safety or persons or property,
or ~htch has not been ~emoved wtthtn 10 days after the scheduled
electton as provtded tn subsection (b)(6). may be removed by the
County summarily and wtthout nottce. The County may bring as action
to recover the reasonable cost of sign fezoval under this subsection.
Added Effective:
04-21-83 (Ord. 348.2126)
8~'TZQlI19.8. T~I~)O~X~.,YC~-BZ'~,~ZSZ~G 8ZG!IS
&. ]l~bi~=t ]Ltz Balloons
1. The maximum 8~1o~able size o£ any hlloon
~1ovodbytJ~Ls eelion e~lX~X~ted to no
~ ~ 1,500 .~=e ~eet, as Mssused at
~ ~00 seaion o~ ~e hXX~ used. (City
o~ S~~ooe O=~ce).
2. AXX bailsone ehalX be gzound mounted
Eoo£ mounted. The aXXowabXe height ohAXX not
ezoeed ,k4rty (30) feet, as meu~od
point o£ 8neho= to the heighest poE~Lon o£ the
balison. (City o£ S&u Mt=oos ~ce).
256
3. Balloon8 may ngt bo £roo-£10&t4ng
(tethered) nor co·st ruc~cod
~10n ~d ~o footL~l. ~lo, ~l~ns Ln
o~l not b ~ttod (~C ~o~~tLon)
· . Ambient balloons ohall be poEmitred to be
d~oplayod £0r · per40d not to ezceed £i£toon
(X5) conoocut4ve dayo v~tJ~tn any oixty day
(60) consecutive day poriod (~Lty 0£ V4st·
~co). xn ·dd~tion, · 30 consocut4ve day
month o£ Temocul·'s annual BLtloon end
reot4val. (TCC
$. The ntud~o~ o£ ball·on· uaod £or
~l~g for noir· ~ ~ (3) at ~y ~o
s~to du~g ~y ~lMd t~ ~rL~ (~ty o~
~ough as to pn~t ~hg, m~la~g, o~
~t~gl~t of one ~o~o~ (TCC
Dlnctor end the Dlroctor 0£ ~lann~ng.
an ·pp1Acat4on end payment of zoqu~rod foes
(to be eotab14obed by the D~zoctor o£
plan, spa~L£:y~ng the loca~Lon o£ the baXloon
to be ·pproved !~ ~ l, lanning and BulldAng
Dopartnont8 with tho frpooL£iod dates o£ the
lot up and t~ko down for &X1 prop·sod
balloons. (Standazd appX4cation proc-~-· £or
temporary signs).
7. Any v~oXatXon o£ th~ adoprod roguXat4on
shall be sub:Jeer to · da£ault auount £or ·ach
· ·pazate o££eno·. Bach day o£ v~olation or
non-~npXian~e with these ~eg~Xationo ohaXX be
deemed ao a oepaxate o££enoe and oub~eot to
the penal~es and Palm~ut o£ da£auAt aaouat·
established b~ t~e CAt~ CounoAX. (Cit~ of San
Uaz~os OcdAnanoe).
APPENDIX A
CURRENT CITY ORDINANCES THAT INCORPORATE AMBIENT AIR BALLOONS
3UN-14-'98 1~:45 ID:CITY OF' SAN MARCOS TEL N0:619~44~-o~3
~o$ w. RIC.I~,Le.R AVEN~ $A~ MARCOS.
AHBIENT AIR BALLOON APPLICATION
(and othe£ inglatables)
Accepted by:
Date:
Receipt NOr
Refundable Ant
APPI, ICANT:
BUSINESS NAME':
ADDRESS:
PHONE NUi~ER:
Approved:
Denied:
Date:_.
SIGN COMPANY:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
DATE BALLOON(S) TO BE INSTAbLED:
DATE BAL~(S) TO BE REHOVED:
BUMBER OF BALLOONS:_.
SIZE OF RACH
I~tT~RIAL USED:
,(c)
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
Filing gee: $50.00 got application plus $200.00 for deposit gee.
(The deaposit fee is Refundable after the camoval of the inflatable.
This fee will be used to defray cost of ~emoval upon any violation
of City regulations.)
Submit:
One (l) folded site plan illustrating the locations o~
the balloon(s) on the site.
One (l) elevation d~awing to scale. showing ~he
location og balloon(s) on ~ho building.
One (1) drawing o~ photograph of the balloon with a
descziption of the balloon. Include the balloon
mate~ialo attacrment method and air source.
have read Ordinance No. 84-637 pertaining to inflatable balloons.
aqree ~o comply with the Requirements stated ~he~etn.
(signature)
$1.~q-14-' 90 15:46
ID:CITY.OF $1:~1 !IqRCOS TEL NO:619744'F-J43
OItD[tdANC[; ~.
AN OROIHAH~ OF THE CITY COU~CIL Or ~ CITY
SAN IqAitCOS AMtNDIHG T~ Z~ING O~IN~. BY
~XVIII. SIGHS. pKETAXNZ~ ~ ~I~AIR ~NS
feltarm:
&ddin~ nay provisions to Section JZd. JKticlu XXXVZI! of the 2ertlrig
024.
ArrZCL~ XJ~II
Governaerie signs toc ~c&fti~ samecy ~ucpomum mE otke[
publi~ ne~eemitT much am ~oad uigam mm, l S&tOC¥ b~acoas.
Public service tl~ and tsm~n~stu:e sigas or alaska.
Holiday de~ocationm thlt do no% advertise · product secYL~a
holiday and ~an (XO) d&ym a~Cer. ·
Ashtent air bal~ooam ~nd o~hec ilmila~ l~tlatibles m~&~l be
~loved o~ly in colnorela~ and Laduatcial :ones subject to
compliance ~tth the faltering pcovtmion$..~
taft&tibiaS) mhatl be lllovld for · peCtod of uo~ mace
than X4 oalsadu days viibin say one calendar
&it suoh tattactbtum utilized vatbin the City must
first obtain mbe approval of the Sutldtn~ Oic~ctoc
the Director Of PanaMaS. Approval emit be obtained
ID:CITY OF SAN MARCOS
TEL. NO: 61~?44T-u4~
l"/01A
O)
d)
s)
required tees (to be established by the Diceoeec oC
location 0£ the .inSlit/hie to be approved bF the
ln£1&tLblea. The time period alleged ~or such use
ebiXZ be ground sourced or coof-~ed.
(SO) ~ee~, as seacured Ccou.tbd ~in~ of anchor .~o
highest portion of the in~Xa~ibio.
~ee suc~ t~iactbtes ~ en~ one sits during
aXisgod time ~ctod.
The maxim aLeMbic size oC any l~cibte alleged
by ~his section s~ll be liaX~ed ~o no ~re ~an ~,S00
in£leciblsCs) used.
an administrative action by the CIty. The permit must
be ~evieved by .the Building and Planning Departments
fouc times the permit tee (deposited vtth the City)
~tch ~OUX4 be used to defray cost oC gemov&~ upon any
default oc violation or City regulations. The
permitCos must agcee to alton. 1~ necessary, for
enfoccomont of this sectton· any City ageQt upon one
ID:CITY (~' S~N ~
TEL. N0:61~'7447543
ordinance 04-637
October 23, tg14
I?OIA
ddy antLee to the poemtrine and to the 0ropecry ovamo.
in~liCible d~ipl~y, provided cnec'e vis a determined
e- ~e ~erai~ee or these agent sh~ll specify the
~e avllding a~ Planning Dicedcots s~li deteralum
the nicerials used viii no~ tide, cent, rip or
o~hervise beeoRe Unsightly du~ing' cae period or
installation. lg much dece~min~ciea cannot be made.
~hen the CI~y ~y.nec issue ~he ~eques~e4 persic, ALL
COUpI~ vi~b the Building ~tce~toc,s specification
requi~uea~o.
h) Xa addL~oa Co providing ~he ~a~oc~Lon on the
pgovidtnq ~OGZ&Cio~ st square tooCave e~ Mxiuua
XtaeaZ fee~ o~ dove,es suspe~ed br vice in ~he ~i~.
T~e loonfinns ladici~od on the perair and app~o~ed and
issued on c~e perBit ~a~ risc c~age during the period
oZ ~Lmo '~o~ V~Lch ~he pecm~ ~8
~Y violation o~ c~e adop~ad regulation ,~ be
lubJec~ ~o a default aBeuric goc each
ottoAle, Each day of violation oc ann-compliance
these regulations shall be dented is a separate
offense end subject co the penalties and p~y~ac
degfu~,oloua~l esC6b~Lihed bY ~e cloy
Section IT: ThL o[dt~nze inal~ ~o~e eC[ec~ e~ be ta [occe
~htcCy (]0) days artec ~he d6Ee st L~l pessage. And the CLoy
published and posted tn the manner required by ldv.
ID:CITYOFSI:INI,V:~.~
TF.L 1%10:619'744'7543
~:~9! P96
I~?QLK
ABIEI~T: CCX,'NCI~B,~8: TMtBJU~.AU
~f~ZOHt~[, G. BUt'~OH, HAYOR
(~XTY OF SAN I'daltOS
/
/
VI~A OODE
itmtrume~t of credit in the amount of five hunare~
1. Si~u area of all such s~mtd~a11 not exceed aecumu-
htive total ~ one (:tOO) eqa~re feet.
Sisns made of rifid tnz~ shall not exceed
twenty-four (24) mqtztre feet.
2. Copy area. No ttmitatilns-
Height. Signs made of rigid materi~t end placed
All other temporary s~ns aria. u~ e~,~ --
ing height limitation3: :'
8upp. No. 20
A.72.24
Post-it" brand fax transmittal memo
1804
APPENDIX A~ZONING
(92)
(b)
(c)
(d)
1. Temporo~ signs sh~11 advertise only the goods
0erricao av~hbl~ on ~e p~ whe~ ~e si~
2. Te~ ~ ~1 ~~ .~ ~y ~ ~ ~y
~ble ~;
b. A ~ ~p~on ~ ~e ~;
d. ~ ~ ~ w~ ~ ~) ~ ~ ~ ~v~.
~aA~it s~tter
~c~ ~ a ~sit shel~r.
Pe~ ~nf~ db~icL T~it ~elMr si~ ~
~ ~t~ h ~ ~mmer~l or ~d~tri~ distri~
or ~ ~iden~ distich, subj~ ~ minor use
~tion. S~ may hi'plaid u~n, et~ched ~ or
~cMd ~ ~ ve~i~! o~s~ on ~e integor of
e ~it ~e~.
1. $~ me ~ ~ ~nside~ ~ ~ ~e indoor
Notification of Sign Ordinance Enforcement
Page 2
Temporary Si.ans:
Temporar~ signs are defined as "any portable sign, banner,
balloon, pennant, valance, or advertising display
constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, pager,
cardboard, wallboard, or other l£gh~ materials, with or
without frames, intended to be displayed for a limited
period of tlme only."
Temporary sians may on1¥ be posted sub~ect to the folXowing
conditions=
(a) Temporary signs may advertise only the goods and
services available on the premises where the sign is
located.
Temporary signs will be permitted for a period not to
exceed fifteen (15) consecutive days within any sixty
(60) consecut£ve day period.
(c)
Temporary signs will only be permitted if the party
responsible for the sign submits the following
information to the Code Enforcement Office for
approval prior to posting of any temporary sign:
Name, address and phone number of the
responsible party.
(2) A brief, written description of the dlsplay.
(3) The date on which posting is to commence.
(4) The date on which the sign(s) are to removed.
Off-site Real Estate Sign_s:
Off-site real estate signs may be displayed only on weekends,
begt~ntng 5:00 p.m. on Friday and ending at midnight the
following Sunday. Off-slte real estate signs may also be
displayed on any legal ho1£day observed by the City of Vista.
Any signs which are posted or maintained in violation of these
provisions may result in the issuance of the citation (Notice to
Appear An Court). Additionally, any sign which is posted in the
public right-of-way will be summarily removed by the City's Code
Enforcement Division.
Your cooperation in adherence to these regulations will be
greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or would like
additional ln£ormatton regarding enforcement of the Slgn
Ordinance, please feel free to contact the City of Vista Code
Enforcement Division at 726-1340, Extension 405.
#~18 PB~
JUN-18-'9~ 18:82 ID:CITY O~ ESCONDIDO TEL N0:6197414699
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
DO~ TRANSMrlTED:
**F~x trmtt'mt~l ink Is not promhint.
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
201 N. BROADWAY
Esc~, ~ 9202S
(619)'7,fi,a699 (FAY)
.]~NO: 61~F7414699 tt618 ~2
10:02 ID:CITY
plastic, oc cica, incl'aSin~ otrmioCqo
vehicle gealff· (n~,, ~ ~ ~'~. SSiO) a~J
JUN-18-'98 10:B~ ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO
TEL NO: 619~414699
S~4ne
Vall-~ounted
Identification
SISns
Vall-Hounted
Sips to Identify
Ind/vidualDepc,.
Di~ection~l
Sisns
eaporary Large
st-air Balloons
Teeperary Banners
Proposed
Sign
Standards
OGe Bofiument
per dealeFship
o~ 2 for
desist,hips
with ~vo
fr~nchises and
275' of fro,rase
per deelership I
or, for dealerships
on corners or with
large expanses Of
buildinS vail,
exceed 200 Se and
to exceed &00 SF
Any aumbe~ with
letters not to
exceed 2~' in
height
Any number
8 SF el,no
Four t/~es per
year for 10-day
special events
Four t~me, per
year for 30
days each t~te
erevioualy
Approved
S~n Standards
per dealership
One 200 SF sign per
dealership
#or alloved
Vere not expressly
allowed, but were
ehov~ on~rhibit
Noc allowed
#oc allowed
Or. her Temporary Small helium #oc allowed
Deeplay, balloons on
weekends
~iT'/~.~: ............ ' ....
:.z .. '... :.j; ~ ~ ~ r~f~, ,
.. FOe smn.y ON, y
C~ Zone
Sign
Standards
One per
or parcel
any number
at 1 8F per
50 SF of
floor area
or 100 SF
of site
area with a
assregale
area of 300
( Inc luded
In above
st~nclard)
any number
signs
Not all,red
For 2VO
30-day
pe~iod, per
year
Alloys any
els, or
device
which move,
with breeze
~or special
event, not
to exceed
10 day,
.. JUN-18-'98 10:03 ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO TEL..NO:619~14699.. #~18 P~4
SHOPPIHG CENTERS
Freestanding
Proposed
Sign
Standards
One 196 SF
inSeErily Illumi-
nated plexiglass.
p~lon slSu for
bpo~ ~n~e:. ~e
~ted v~d alga
Approved
Si~n St&ndards
One externally
lllusln&ted wood
eisa for each center ·
(size Per CG
requireneats)
Vall-Mmmted
Leasing
Signs
?supsEarI
Internally lit
plexiglass for
Ho~e Depot Center
(one for each in-
line shop. two for
outpads and in. line
vith rear to a
street). Kxternally
lit eood for Burger
Kln~ Center.
and number pec C~
etondeEds
One 6 $F eisa in
vacant shop window
plus one ~0 sF elsa
along street
SeMlI helium
balloons, banners
and portable elsas
to advertise grand
openauks
One 20 $F or 30 SF
wood mtrquee sign
on building front
(depending on length
of lEontags)
Hot exp£essly
alleyed
Not alleyed
DRAFT COPY
FOR STUDY ONLY
CG Zone
standards'
One 10o se
eisa foe
each cantee
·nd one 60
$F monument
for each
outpad on ·
separate
parcel
Any rambeE
with area
l~uited to
I sF s~n
per $0 SF
floor area
with Iaxi-
sam a~re-
gate o~ ~00
Two 16 $F
signs per
parcel or
lot
BornleEs
other
deviceI
which. Bove
with bEeeze
to adver-
tise special
events not
exceeding 10
days
S~/89- 3&-PD/9- 3
JUN-I~-'9~ 10:94 ID:CITY [~r E~qDIDO TEL ~:619741~6~ .... ~618
~X~XT
1. A copy of the revised CC&E's shall be subsisted ~o and appr~ed by
PI~g ~pa~sent prior to approval o~ any sign perel~s vith~ the
[sc~d/~ AuLo Pa~, ~e subsisted ~&R's s~11 be consis~en~ v/~h
Attac~nt vith the ~ollov~S excep~Aons~
A. ~all heli~ balloons referred ~o in Section II.E.2.e.1 shall
all.red only An conJ~c~/on ei~h an issued Cl~y pemtt ~or ~eaporary
ILsplay o[ a b~er
B. h~er si~s Ben~io~ed ~ Sec~Lon ZI,E.2.e.2 shall ~ l~i~ed to tvo
10-day perils vithin any 12-aonth ~rlod sad to 100 SF An a~ea and
require a Ci~y pe~i~.
~e use of large hot-air balloons searLened ~ Section
s~11 be l~lted to tee 10-~y ~riodl vithi~ any 12-~onth pegLed
~d re~rel a C~ty permit.
E. ~e head~ for Section II.~.~.c ihall read 'For any lite ~ln~ used
. ~or ~eneral co~erclal putpete, o~her t~au auto dealerships."
~n~er ,t the no~hves~ co~r ot Valley Parkely and &uco Fa~ Vay.
O. ~cclon II.E.~.c.S Ihall read "Special t~nl ~Ch vary tree
I~n criteria mu,~ tlrlt ~ ipprov,d by the 0~er. D.~.C.. and
ob~a~ P~ini Co~ls,lon coKurrence.
Section lI.E.~.c.a shall be revl~ed ,o ae not to alloy ~he
o[ a ~eipo~a~ t~eestind~ I~ln I1on~ Valley Parkray.
~1 approval ~ ,ubject to all applicable condl~l~6 of Trace 477 and/or
All future reque,~s ~or s~gnise vith~ ~e Au~o Park shall be rapproved by
~he Auto P~ ~si~n ~evlev Co~l~ee, CIty ~81sn Reviev Committee or
~sl~ Revlev Board, Pl~ln~ ~par~ent, and Bulld~s
ipplice~ions shall be subsisted ~o ~e PlanIns ~partsont and
~lude ~hree sets of plans and the approval o[ the Au~o Park
brier Co~lttee. ~e City ~818n Revise ~it~eo or ~8isn Revlev
~ard shall reviev ~he request for confenice vith ~he Clty*s deol~
reviev ~uidel~es co ensure sdequate separation bedesen siSns and
FOR STUDY ONLY
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
AB# ~9 TITLE: DEPT HD.
W~G /e/gt~/YO STI~T S%VF~R!~ING CITY ATTY
D~T 'W~
CITY MGR ~ ~
RECOMM~NDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to contract for street
sweeping in the City on a one time basis prior to 1uly 4, 1990 and appropriate $2500 from
contingency.
BACKGROUND
In order to clean up the town prior to 4th of 1uly, it is suggested that "operation clean sweep"
be approved.
This would provide four sweepers to hit the high traffic streets in the City on one day between
4:00 AM and noon.
It would provide a demonstration of how sweeping would benefit the City and provide feedback
from citizens.
R.F. Dickson is a contractor who provides sweeping in many cities. He would like an
opportunity to show what he can do.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are available in contingency for this year, and $50,000 is budgeted for street sweeping
next year. No specific program has been worked out.
June 1~,1990
City of Temecula
P.O.Box 3000
FAX (71~) 69~-1999
Temecula, CA 92390
ATT: Mr. Frank Aleshire/Interim City Manager
REFERENCE: Clean-up of main arterial roads and the commercial
and industrial areas within the City of Temecula.
SCOPE OF WORK:
PROPOSAL # 1
Dickson Co. of Inland Empire to supply four mobil
sweepers with operaters, as required for an eight hour
sweep of highlighted streets shown on map attached.
Sweeping is recommended to be between the hours of 4 AM
until 12 noon on June 26, if this is agreeable by the
City of Temecula.
Working on Tuesday will allow the City 3 additional days
to have any extra sweeping done, desired by the City
prior to July 1.
For the above described work the lump sum of $2,500.00,
shall apply.
PROPOSAL # 2
A second proposal is to have 4 sweepers available to the
City of Temeculs to use at their discretion. The cost for
this is 65.00 per hour per sweeper.
NOTES: (1) City of Temecula to supply water for sweepers.
(2) Dickson Co. to provide dumpsite and haul
all debris to land fill at a per trash truck
load of debris cost of $225.00 each. To be
R.F. Dickson Company Municipal Sweeping 12524 Clark Avenue
Construction Clean-up Downey, CA 90242
Sweeper Sales
213/923-5441
800/841-7994
June 14, 1990
City of Temecula
paid for at the conclusion of the sweep,
by the City of Temecula. It is our estimate
it will require approximately, 7 loads.
(3) Insurance Certification is to be provided to
the City of Temecula upon acceptance of this
proposal.
PROPOSED BY: PHil TFPJtATH
DICKSON CO. OF INLAND EMPIRE
TITLE: SALES REPRESENTATIVE
DATE dUNE 14,1990
ACCEPTED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
BY:
TITLE:
DATE
R.F. Dickson Company Municipal Sweeping 12524 Clark Avonue
Construction Clean-up Downey, CA 9{)242
Sweeper Sales
213/923-5441
800/841-7994
F
HIS'I'ORY
or over 40 yea~s, the R.F. Dickson
Company, Inc. has grown from simply
supplying sweepers on a limited basis
to a full line street sweeping company.
Wholly owned and operaled as a family
business for over three generations, the
Dickson Company has grown to
encompass over 60 major cities,
counties, and state agencies in both
California a.d Arizona
The Dickson Company has been able to
expand it's line of service, while not
being too big or impersonal to provide
the quality and service cities expect
and deserve. In fact, a look at the
Dickson client list will show customers
that have been with the Company
for decades.
CONTII. ACTS
Upon request, the Dickson Company
takes the initiative to research what a
client"S street sweeping needs are, and
then works with the client to develop a
full service contract that provides
qualily service at a reasonable price.
Dickson not only tailors each contract
to fit a client's specific needs and
spf.~r:ial evenIs. Iml also slamIs bohilld
their contracts with a sense of pride
and commitment. A multi-year contract
with Dickson also means that an
average client could save anywhere
from 10% to 30% on street sweeping
costs compared to operating its
own line of sweepers.
T
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
he Dickgnn ~nmpnny mCn!lnims
obligation to lhe community. Because
'" of this Dickson is committed to working
with young people in the communily,
educating them about tl~e dangers of
drug abuse. Organizing anti-drug
campaigns and rallies, Dickson has
been able to educate and help many
young people. Dickson works with the
develop new ones that refiecl
positive interest and involvement each
ci15 wisheslo convoy to it'; citizens
and ifs community. Dickson urges
interested communities to conlact them
Io learn mo~e about Ihe program.
SERVICE & REPAIRS
Kn.wn hu Ihei~ exlensive knuwledgo of
the mechanical operations of street
sweepers, the Dickson Company has
the capability of customizing and
performing a preventive maintenance
program to suit the individual cus-
tomer's needs. Preventive mainte-
nance is the key to less down time. As
Dicksoh's fieel has qrnwn, so has the
mainlenance lacililies to support the
equipment. ]he Dickson Company can
handle any size repair job with it's
complete line of in-sleek parts and
experienced personnel, which means
"faster service at lower costs"
II
I
I
I
A
REBUILDING
flor years of use. the cost of maintain-
illg a sweepo~ c;.lll I)P.l:olll(: ('.ost
prohibitive. Starting with just a frame,
Dickson can rebuild every inch of the
sweeper and transform it into "like
new" condition, for approximately half
the cost of purchasing a new machine.
The Dickson Company provides quality
street sweeper rebuilding to ensure
customers with reliable sweepers at
reasonable p~ i~:es
I'ARTS
All extensive I~a~ls del)admonI Jills
been developed to support the needs
of Dicksun's fleet and it's customers
As a result, the Dickson Company
surpassns other dealers in both part
availabilities and pricing Also,
qualified salesmen are always on hand
to provide a better understanding of
the equipment and to help answer any
service questions.
SALES
Dicksee's extensive line of sweepers,
along with their rebuilding capabilities
allows them to sell used and rebuilt
equipment at the most competitive
prices. In addition to selling equip-
ment, Dickson also provides a leasing
option for those cities or cuslomers
wanting to reduce preliminary cosIs.
SI:,RV !(
For four decades tile Dickson Company
has worked hard to provide the quality
of service communities have come to
expect and deserve With this dynamic
commitment to quality and service,
R.F. Dickson Company, Inc. is tile
industry leader, not only the best, but
setting the pace in the street
sweeping industry
Printed Courtes~ of
RANCHO TEMECULA MURRIETA BOARD OF R~ALTORS®
For:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Incorporated November 7, 1989
Prepared for the City Manager's Office
+
TEMECULA
SCALE
t
ESTATES
CITY OF TEMECUhA
AGENDA 1H ORT
RF~CO~ATIONS
It is recommended that City Council authorize City Manager to prepare an agreement with
Temecula Town Center to make the following improvements on Rancho California Road:
(a) install traffic signal at the main entrance to the shopping center
close the existing median cut at the westerly driveway to the shopping center
(Marie Catlenders)
(c) reimburse developer for improvements out of future sales tax revenues
(d) request Rancho Water District to install pilot drought-resistant plants in the
medians east of Ynez Road
BACKGROUND
When the Town Center was developed, the owners requested County permission to install two
traffic signals -- one on Ynez Road and one on Rancho California Road.
The County Road Depamnent determined the signals did not meet County warrants and denied
the request. The County has now determined traffic congestion and accidents at the shopping
center entrances provide sufficient warrant to install traffic signals. Bedford Properties is
required to install a signal at the main drive way entrance to the Von's Center on the west side
of Ynez Road. That project is in design and will be under construction this summer. Town
Center paid over $300,000 in traffic mitigation fees and believes those fees should be used for
the Rancho California signalizafion. County policy is not to use traffic mitigation funds for
private driveways.
Town Center developers need to complete the median landscaping on Rancho California Road.
All other phases of development are complete and no discretionary permits are required. The
City cannot require any further traffic improvements.
City Council requested staff to study accidents and flow problems along Rancho California Road.
Willdan traffic studies recommend the left turn pocket nearest Ynez Road be closed to eliminate
bn~rds at that location and a signal be placed at the main entrance to Target store.
City Manager met with owners (Land Grant Development) and worked out an agreement for the
city to reimburse owner for the cost of traffic improvements, and Land Grant would assume
responsibility for designing and building the improvements. Town Center merchants are
concerned that construction work be completed by Thanksgiving.
City Manager requested Rancho Water District to consider using the median area as a site for
a drought-tolerant planting demonstration project. The water district board agreed to design,
install and maintain plants as a demonstration to show citizens of Temecula how drought-tolerant
landscaping works. This is an important project for the City, because of the need to consider
water conservation measures in connection with outdoor landscaping.
The current landscaping used along Rancho California Road is high maintenance and high water
requirement.
Land Grant is willing to undertake the work if the City will agree to reimburse for the cost
incurred over and above landscape improvements. My recommendation is that the Council agree
to commit 25 percent of the sales tax received from the Town Center businesses and enter into
a reimbursement agreement similar to the sales tax agreement u 'tdized on Ynez Corridor. the
Town Center is not a part of the Ynez Corridor/Mello Roos District.
FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated cost of rebuilding the median, installing the landscaping and the signal is
$200,000. The cost of landscape installation will be bore by Land Grant as a condition of
development and the maintenance cost of the median will be bore by Rancho Water District.
If desired, the cost of signal installation could be charged to the traffic signal mitigation fund
or included in the developer fee traffic deficiency study now under way.
Willdan Traffic Report
3. Rancho California Road at the Shoppincl Center ITwo Items)
The segment of Rancho California Road between Ynez Road and Moraga Road is under
investigation by the City staff for possible modification to the median and left turn
access to the shopping center. This segment is also a part of an overall corridor
Improvements and a study of the landscape and beautification program from Front
Street to Moraga Road. The corridor study may be extended east of Moraga Road
depending on the land use intensity proposed on the currently undeveloped land
south of Rancho California Road.
Our preliminary analysis of the traffic flow, access to the shopping center and
accident records from December 1989 to April 1990 on Rancho California, indicates
the need for access management to improve the traffic operation and safety on
Rancho California between Ynez Road and Moraga Road. The City staff recommends
the following:
Eliminate the left turn lane at the westerly driveway and the median be
restored to full width. Access at this driveway should be by right turn
only.
Be
The left turn storage at the second driveway should be increased to 250
feet. A traffic signal should also be installed to control the traffic
movements from the shopping center. The church driveway on the
south side of Rancho California should be aligned with the existing
median opening.
No changes are recommended for the other median openings on Rancho
California because they currently serve developments on both sides of
the road.
D. The raised median concept should be extended to Moraga Road.
Ee
Traffic signal on Rancho California Road between Moraga Road and
Front Street should be interconnected and traffic timing plans be
coordinated to provide for optimum traffic flow along the corridor.
The City staff should work closely with Land Grant Development and
other property owners to coordinate the landscape plan with the
proposed roadway improvements.
~. Pala Road Allclrmmnt at Hicahway 79
The lama Road alignment study was initiated by the City staff as requested by the
Mayor during May 22. 1990. Council meeting. The City staff visited the site to
Identify the problem. Pala Road crosses the Temecula River by a two (2) lane
bridge. The road serves the Temecula Inn. the Rainbow Canyon Development and
the golf course. An attempt was made to contact both the Corps of Engineers and
the Dep~ I~,mnt of Fish and Wildlife on Friday. May 25. 1990. The staff also
contacted Sergeant Ron Roberts of the California Highway Patrol regarding accident
r~.: ds at these Io~tlons.
Z
' I
W
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
MTG: 6/26/90
DEPT: CM
TITLE:
CALLE MEDUSA
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
IH~2OMM1;.NDATION
That Council direct City Manager to implement the traffic improvements recommended in The
BACKGROUND
City staff was directed by Council to work with the residents on Calle Medusa to improve traffic
conditions.
Willdan completed a traffic study of the area and recommends: Three STOP intersections,
crosswalks, warning signs, a 25 MPH sr, c~ zone and school bus stop.
Two meetings were held with area developers and residents to discuss these recommendations.
Residents would also like to have Council consider speed bumps and prohibition of trucks on
the street.
Developer of US Homes has agreed to install the signs and markings if desired by City Council.
Developer would also 'consider doing an expanded waffic study to address alternate street
patterns to reduce through traffic on CAIIe Medusa.
FISCAL IMPACT
City has spent $14,000 on Traffic studies. Developer will install sign at estimated cost of $ ...
Traffic enforcement will be provided by Police Department
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
MTG:
DEPT:
TITLE:
CALLE MEDUSA TRAFFIC CONTROL
STUDY
DEPT HO-I~
CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
RECOMMENDATION
The Engineering Department recommends that the City Council:
Direct the Police Department to enforce the prima facie speed limit of 25
mph on Calle Medusa between Enfield Lane and La Serena Way as
established by the vehicle code for residential districts.
Direct the Engineering Department to coordinate the posting of 25 mph
speed limit signs with U.S. Home Corporation (the developer of the
surrounding tract TR 18518) prior to the acceptance of Calle Medusa for
maintenance purposes and the subsequent reduction of the improvement
bonds.
Endorse the previously installed three-way stop sign controls at the
intersections of Calle Medusa with Riverton Lane and Chauncey Way, and
approve the installation of 3-way stop controls at the intersection of Calle
Medusa and Enfield Lane; subject to the following extenuating
circumstances:
Calle Medusa was designed to the Riverside County street standards
for a residential collector (Nll66). However, due to the Incomplete
development of the City's circulation system, Calle Medusa is also
functioning as a through street to provide north/south access within
the City.
Be
There is an average of one residential driveway with the potential
for a vehicle to back into Calle Medusa approximately every 100 feet.
Ce
Community mailboxas have been Installed on alternative side~ of
Calle Medusa causing pedestrians to continually cross the street.
De
There are school bus loading/unloading ~op, st Enfleld Lane.
Chauncay Way. and Riverton Lane.
Direct the Engineering Department to establish crosswalks at the three
locations controlled by stop signs.
A. Enfield Lane and Calle Medusa
B. Chauncey Way and Calle Medusa
C. Riverton Lane and Calle Medusa
Direct the Engineering Department to coordinate the installation of the stop
signs, all appropriate striping, and the installation of the crosswalks with
U.S. Home Corporation prior to the acceptance of Calle Medusa for
maintenance purposes and the subsequent reduction of the improvement
bonds.
Direct the Engineering Department to coordinate the location of the school
bus loading zones in conjunction with the installation of all recommended
traffic control devices.
Refer the issues of speed bumps and truck routes to the Traffic Safety
Commission to formulate draft policies for recommendation to the City
Council.
Discussion
The residents of homes adjacent to Calle Medusa street approached City Officials
in March of this year to express traffic safety concerns relative to the type of
traffic, quantity of traffic, and speed of traffic using Calle Medusa. Calle
Medusa between Enfield Lane and La Serena Way has been fully improved to the
Riverside County standards for a local collector street (forty four feet of asphalt
paving between curbs within a 66 foot right of way) through the construction of
Tract No. 18518 and Tract No. 22148. North of Enfield Lane, Calle Medusa has
been paved to a width of 32 feet with intermittent asphalt berm and curb and
gutter. Tract No. 18518 has completed the majority of their required street
improvements to their southerly tract boundary (_+ 700 feet south of Riverton).
However, Tract No. 22148 is still under construction and will need to complete the
final course paving from the southerly tract boundary of Tract No. 18518 to La
Serena Way. In addition, some unauthorized 25 mph speed limits have been
posted along Calle Medusa and stop signs have been installed at Chauncey Way
and Riverton Lane. There is presently no striping on the street.
Calle Medusa is a local street as defined by the California Department of
Transportation on the latest functional usage and federal aid maps as submitted
to the Federal Highway Administration. As a local street is was designed to
collect the traffic generated by the adjacent development and transmit it to the
major components of the City's circulation system. However, because of the
current incomplete state of the City's circulation system, a higher percentage of
traffic is using the street as a north/south through route than was anticipated
during the design of the street. As a local collector street, Riverside County
permitted residences to front on Calle Medusa with the corresponding driveways
opening on to it. This situation creates the potential for numerous unexpected
conflicts when the street is functioning differently than it was designed to. In
addition, the surrounding subdivisions have been constructed with community
mail boxes that require some of the homeowners to cross the street to obtain their
mail. Together with the location of three (3) school bus loading/unloading areas,
there is more pedestrian activity than would be anticipated by a motorist using
the street as a through route.
-3-
The California Department of Transportation recommends that the following
warrants be used when considering the installation of multi-way stop signs.
POLICY
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway STOP sign
inltelletion:
Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the
multiway ~op may be an Interim measure that can be initelled
quickly to control traffic while arrangement~ are being made for the
signal inatelletions.
An accident problem. as Indicated by five or more reported
accidents within a 12 month period of a type auscaptible to
.=,:, e~tion by a multiway stop installation. Such accidonte Include
right end left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
Minimum traffic volume.
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches muet average at laset 500 vehicles per hour for
any 8 hour. of an average clay, and
The combined vehicular and ~ian volume fr~m the minor
street or highway muet average at leaet 200 unite per hour for
the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor etreet
vehicular traffic at least 30 .econda per vehicle during the
maximum hour, but
Ce
When the 85-p-: ce ,tile approach apeeel of the major street
traffic exceeds ~) miles per hour. the minimum vehicular
volume warrant is 70 percent of the Ibove recluiremente.
The Engineering staff conducted 24 hour traffic counts on Calle Medusa and the
intersecting side streets in order to evaluate the warrants. A summary of the 24
hour volumes on Calle Medusa are shown below for your review.
Hour Volumes
SB NB Total
South of Nicolas Road
South of Chauncey Way
North of La Serena Way
1, q Jr6 1,359 2,805
1,098 1,175 2,273
1,459 1,674 3,133
In addition to the traffic counts. Riverside County Officials also indicated that
none of the intersections involved in the study met the accident criteria. Staff
does not recommend the use of unwarranted signs as a solution to traffic
problems.
Numerous traffic engineering studies demonstrate that when stop signs are
arbitrarily installed to interrupt through traffic, there exists a high incidence
of intentional violation which leads to an increase in accidents. Many citizens
assume the installation of stop signs will control speeding. Research studies have
shown that vehicles do slow down when approaching stop signs but immediately
accelerate to normal cruising speed after the sign. Therefore, the only reduction
that is experienced at stop signs is within 100-200 foot approaches on either side
of the intersection. In addition, mid-block speeds usually become slightly
higher, possibly due to motorists trying to make up for lost time. Another
important aspect that cannot be overlooked regarding stop controls is the
increase in ambient noise and pollutant level in the vicinity of the stop sign. This
factor should be taken into consideration in residential neighborhoods where the
increased noise levels of cars breaking and accelerating might be objectionable.
However, staff recognizes that the situation occurring on Calle Medusa does not
fit into the typical warrant evaluation categories (sight distance, accidents,
volumes). Staff also recognizes that warrants are to be used as guidelines and
that the Council may evaluate each situation on a case by case basis. Therefore,
the staff recommends that the Council consider approving the existing stop signs
at Calle Medusa and Riverton Lane and Chauncey Way along with a new multiway
stop at Enfield Lane due to the following extenuating circumstances.
Ae
Calla Medusa was designed to the River,side County street standards
for a residential c~11ector [~I/66). Howavor, due to the incomplete
development of the City'a circulstion system, Calla Medusa ia also
functioning es an through street to provide northlsouth re:tess
within the City.
Be
Cm
De
There is an average of one residential driveway with the potential
for a vehicle to back into Calla Medusa opproxi.mtely every 100 feet.
Community mailboxes have been Installed on altornstiva aides of
Celia Medusa causing pedestrians to continually cross the street.
There are school bus Icading/unlcading stops st Enfield lane,
Cheuncay Way, and Riverton lane.
A house count was conducted on Calle Medusa between Enfield Lane and La Serena
Way and it was determined that this section of roadway qualifies for a prima facie
speed limit of 25 mph under the following section of the California Vehicle Code.
Resiclenca District
S15. A "residence district" is that portion of. highway and the property
oontiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of
which highway, within a dimnca of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous
houPrOpertmrtm ory f. ron. ting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling
Dualnm structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway,
collectively, within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property
fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separm~ dwelling houses or
business structures.
-5-
A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of · mile if the above
ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of
the highway exists.
In addition, the Engineering Department is recommending the installation of
crosswalks at the stop sign locations along with coordinating the school bus stops
at these locations in an attempt to direct the pedestrian traffic to location where
the motorist would expect them.
At the community meetings between City staff and the residents, a preliminary
agreement was reached involving the developer of Tract No. 18518 and Kunzman
Associates preparing a study of potential alternative routes to through traffic
using Calle Medusa. Unfortunately, an agreement between the two parties was
not reached and the study was never prepared.
In addition, several questions were raised involving the use of speed bumps or
speed humps and the prohibition of truck traffic through the neighborhood.
There is a significant difference between speed humps and speed bumps { devices
which have been common in shopping center parking lots for many years). A
speed bump is an abrupt pavement feature, 3 or ~ inches high and only 1 to 3 feet
in length at its base (measured in the direction of vehicle travel). A speed
hump, on the other hand, is ~ inches in height, but much gentler in
configuration, with a length of at least 12 feet at its base. Speed humps control
speed without the "jarring" effect of speed bumps. Speed bumps are not
recommended to be installed for the following reasons: high traffic counts,
hazard to bicyclists, potential damage to vehicles, all motorists are subjected to
the device, whereas only a few are in need of being alerted, motorists may make
unusual maneuvers to avoid the bumps and possibly endanger other motorists.
However, several communities such as Pasadena and Santa Clarita use "speed
humps" in selected locations on local residential streets. It is recommended that
this matter be referred to the Traffic Safety Commission to investigate the
development of a city wide policy. The Engineering department would also
recommend that the Traffic Safety Commission review potential truck routes and
recommend a policy to Council before indiscriminate restriction of truck traffic
starts to occur. In the interim, the City's construction inspectors will visit the
construction sites in the area that appear to be generating the through truck
traffic and encourage them to use alternate routes.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: ..,'.~ TITLE: PROPOSAL TO PREPARE DEPT H0'~ .~~'~
HTG: ~,-~.~, .~o
DEPT:~-*,-,,.&.,\ COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE INVENTORY CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council direct the City Manager to execute a contract with Lightfoot
Planning Group to conduct a comprehensive land use inventory.
BACKGROUND
The County of Riverside does not have a system to provide the City with a
comprehensive report on all approved projects within the City. Subsequently,
the staff has no way to anticipate which final parcel maps and tract maps will be
forwarded to the Council for approval. In addition, the plot plan approval
procedure permits a 24 month period for a developer to actually begin
construction. Subsequently, staff is currently working blindly in terms of
having a baseline on the location, number, and intensity of development citywide.
The City is currently preparing a developer impact fee study. In order to
identify future infrastructure mitigation, it is imperative that the existing level
of development and existing infrastructure deficiencies be identified. To address
this need, the attached Request for Proposal (RFP) was prepared. The Request
for Proposal was mailed to four (4) local planning firms. The planning firms
which received the R. F. P. were Lohr Associates, The Lightfoot Planning Group,
Robert Bein, William Frost Associates, and J.F. Davidson. The proposals were
due on June 11, 1990.
A total of four proposals were received. Attached B. is a matrix analysis of the
four proposals. As can be seen by the matrix, the costs to conduct the services
ranged from $24,100 to $93,760. All four proposals have similar schedules to
complete Tasks 1-4 (the research and data presentation). The cost for the
optional item of providing a computerized data base ranged from $13,500 to
$90,000. After analyzing all proposals in great detail, staff recommends that
Council instruct the City Manager to execute a contract with Lightfoot Planning
Group to conduct the land use inventory and the optional computerized data base.
FISCALIMPACT
The cost of this contract is $37,600. It is recommended that an appropriation be
made from the FY 1989-90 City Council Contingency, account number 001-303.
Mayor
Ron Pafi~
Mayor Pro Tem
Karel F. Lindemans
CITY OF TEMECULA
P,O. Box 3000
Temecula, California 92390
(714) 694-1989
FAX (714) 694-1999
(ATTACHMENT A)
Councilmembers
Patricia H. Birdsall
Peg Moore
J. Sal Mu~ioz
(DATE)
FOR PROPOSALS
Dear Sir:
The City of Temecula requests proposals from qualified consultants
to identify approved projects within the corporate limits. The
City of Temecula incorporated in December, 1989 and is now
responsible for development review. Prior to incorporation, the
County of Riverside reviewed and approved development projects
throughout the community. The City wants to create a comprehensive
development baseline prior to embarking on advanced planning
projects. To this end, the City requests that consultants submit
proposals to address the following needs. It is anticipated that
the consultant will be required to review project files at both the
County Administrative Center in Riverside and Temecula City Hall.
(1)
Identify all Tentative Tract Haps, Parcel Maps (residential,
commercial and industrial) and Plot Plans (commercial and
industrial) within the City of Temecula. At minimum the
followinq information will be required:
A. Applicant/representative (name/address/phone nu~er).
B. Acreage.
C. Number of lots/square footage.
D. Location (napped).
E. Date of Filing/Date of Approval/Map Expiration.
F. List or provide improvements required.
G. Amount of Development Fees Collected by Type.
H. Copy of Map (folded to 8 1/2 x 11).
Page TWo
(2)
(3)
(4)
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
.A.
Identify&11 Approved Specifio Plans within the City Limits
Project Name.
Applicants/Representatives Name/Address
Total Number of Residential Lots.
Total Commercial Acreage Approved.
Maximum Square Footage of Commercial Uses.
Total Industrial (if applicable).
G. Copy of Development Agreement Approved with Project.
H. Total development impact fees paid by type.
Copy of approved Land Use Plan.
J. All non-standard Conditions of Approval on and off-site.
K. List of public improvements required.
Identifyill approved Conditional Use Permits within the City.
A. Applicants/Representatives Name/Address.
B. Type of Conditional Use Permit.
C. Use Permitted.
D. Location (Mapped).
Conditions of Approval.
F. Expiration Date.
Prepare · Comprehensive Report showing the following:
A map and table listing all existing land use types
including: average number of units and square footage
for non-residential uses.
B. A map and table showing all vacant land by land use type
and acreage.
C. A listing of all projects with development agreements.
Page Three
Ut
A map and table listing all approved developments by
stage of approval (whatever these are: application
submitted, application accepted, etc.) including total
acreage of the project, a breakdown of each land use type
with acreage, number of dwelling units and/or square
footage of non-residential development.
A City of Temecula base map showing all special district
boundaries.
(5) Optional Item
Prepare a comprehensive computerized land use inventory by
Assessor's parcel number with information layers which can
show all data listed abovein Item 4.
Proposals are due no later than 4:00 p.m., June 11, 1990.
Proposals will not be accepted after 4:00 p.m. Proposals should
include a brief background about the firmrs experience at
identifying the information requested. The project manager
assigned to this program will also be identified. This manager
shall conduct all interactions between the City and the Consultant.
The planners assigned to the project shall be included with the
proposal. Proposals should not exceed five (5) pages excluding
resumes.
A lump sum fee shall be proposed.
be based on the following factors:
and (3) experience of personnel.
The award of the contract will
(1) cost, (2) project schedule,
If you have any questions, please dontt hesitate to contact me at
(714) 694-1989.
Sincerely,
Ross Geller
Planning Director
RGad
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LAND USE INVENTORY
PROPOSAL ANALYSIS
LIGHTFOOT
RBF
LOHR DAVIDSON
Cost
Tasks 1-4
$24,100
$29.800
~1~7,500 $93,760
Time of
Performance
Task 1-~.
8 Weeks
9 Weeks
9 Weeks 8 Weeks
Cost
Task 5*
$13,500
$55,00 - $90,000
No Bid $37,100
Time of
Completion
Tasks 1-5
Weeks
Not Determined No Bid 13 Weeks
Total Tasks
1-5 $37,600
$84,800-$119,800
Not $130,850
Compatible
* Optional Computerized Data Base
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
TITLE:
BU~.DING INSPECTION
DEPT HD.
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR~9~
RECOMMFNDATION
It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor to sign "Agreement for
Building Plans Examining Services" with Willdan Associates.
BACKGROUND
At City Council meeting April 17, 1990, Tom Ingram, County Director of
Building and Safety, indicated the County Department of Building and Safety
would prefer to have City take over building inspection July 1, 1990. City
Manager recommended that City call for proposals from private companies to
provide said services.
After discussion, Council directed City Manager to work out a contract with the
County to continue County services until the City can hire its own employees.
Further discussions have been held with Tom Ingram and the following plan has
been worked out:
On July 1, 1990, the City will assume responsibility for building services. The
County will assist as requested and will bill the City at an hourly rate for services
rendered. The City will collect fees, handle public contract and assign plan
checking and inspection to the County or to private contractors.
In order to manage this process, it is recommended that City contract with
W'fildan Associates on an interim basis.
City has advertised and is recruiting for a chief building official to take over the
department. When that happens, the Willdan contract will be phased out.
The County will continue inspection on projects in the pipeline on July 1.
W'fildan will take over new permits filed after July 1, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT
The County has not provided any data on workload or fees collected in Temecula.
The 1990-91 City budget estimates $1.4 million in building permit fees.
Experience indicates that costs incurred will be less than fees collected. Council
will be able to monitor receipts and expenditures on the monthly financial reports.
.~.GREEMENT FOR BUILDING PLANS EXAMINING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of ,
1990 . by and between the City of Temecula a municipal corporation located in
the County of Riverside. State of California. hereinafter referred to as
"CITY" and Willdan Associates. a California corporation with principal offices
at 222 South Harbor Boulevard, Suite 600, Anaheim, California, hereinafter
referred to as "ENGINEER".
WlTNESSETH
WHEREAS, CITY desires to contract for Building Plans Examining servic-
es with a private consultant in anticipation that said private consultant can
provide such services in a more expeditious manner at or below the present
costs to the CITY; and
WHEREAS. ENGINEER is experienced in providing such services for mu-
nicipal corporations and is able to provide personnel with the proper experi-
ence and background to carry out the duties involved; and
WHEREAS, CITY wishes to retain ENGINEER for the performance of said
services;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits
and premises herein stated. the parties hereto agree as follows:
CITY does hereby appoint ENGINEER in a contractual capacity to per-
form the following services in accordance with the terms and conditions here-
inafter set forth:
BUILDING PLANS EXAMINING SERVICES
ENGINEER shall, at the request of the CITY, examine plans for
compliance with the ClTY's Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical
Codes and other pertinent CITY and State regulations .falling within the
1
purview of the Buildin9 Official. Employees of ENGINEER shall have the
power and duties of the Plans Examiner of the CiTY when performing
such work for structures review by ENGINEER.
OTHER MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
CITY may from time-to-time have the need for other services not
specifically listed in this Agreement for which ENGINEER has the neces-
sary experience and capabilities to provide. CiTY may authorize ENGI-
NEER to perform such selected services on an as-needed basis.
COLLECTION OF FEES
All fees to be collected from any applicant in connection with the
carrying out of the functions as set forth in this Agreement shall be col-
lected by the CITY.
IV COMPENSATION TO ENGINEER
A. For services performed under Paragraph I of this Agreement, ENGI-
NEER shall be compensated at a rate of 75% of the plan reviewing
fees collected by the CITY per .the then current edition .of the Uni-
form Building Code for each project reviewed by ENGINEER hereun-
der for structures not exceeding $1 million in valuation.
For structures exceeding $1 million in valuation, ENGINEER shall be
compensated in an amount equal to 65% of the plan review fees col-
lected by the CITY for structures to be reviewed by ENGINEER.
B. For services performed under Paragraph I I of this Agreement, EN-
GINEER shall be compensated at the then current hourly rates, per
Exhibit "A", or as it may be adjusted each July 1.
V TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by the
City at any time. In the event of such termination, ENGINEER shall be
2
Ill
¥1
~xnpensated for such services up to the point of termination. Such
compensation for work in progress would be pro-rated as to the percent-
age of work completed at the date of termination. This Agreement may
be terminated by ENGINEER only by providing CITY with written notice
not less than ninety {90) days in advance of such termination.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. ENGINEER shall provide no services for any private client within
the corporate boundaries of CITY during the period that this
Agreement is in effect which is subject to review by the CITY.
B. CITY shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct
payment of any salary, wage or other compensation to any person
employed by ENGINEER performing service hereunder for CITY.
C. "All officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, their agents, offi-
cers, and employees who are hired by or engaged by ENGINEER in
the performance of this Agreement shall be deemed officer, agents,
and employees and subcontractors of ENGINEER, and CITY shall not
be liable or responsible to them for anything whatsoever other than
liability to ENGINEER as set forth in this Agreement. ENGINEER
agrees to save, keep and hold harmless CITY and all of its officers
and employees from all damages, costs or expenses in law and equi-
ty including costs of suit and expenses for legal services that may
at any time arise or be set up because of damage to property or in-
jury to parsons received or suffered by reason of any wrongful or
negligent act or omission on the part of ENGINEER or any of its
agents, officers, employees and subcontractors in the performance
of this contract.
3
C_ngineer shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the wrong-
ful or negligent acts of CITY or its officers, employees, and sub-
contractors, and CITY shall defend and hold ENGINEER harmless
against such claims. In the event that ENGINEER is sued in his
official capacity for reasons other than the wrongful or negligent
acts or omissions of ENGINEER, or ENGINEER'S officers, agents,
employees, and subcontractors. CITY shall defend and hold harm-
less ENGINEER
Engineer agrees to and shall at its own cost and expense procure
and maintain during the term of this Agreement both general liabili-
ty and automobile liability insurance in an amount of not less than 1
million {$1,000,000) each, per occurrence as to automobile liability
insurance and per occurrence and annual aggregate as to general
liability insurance. Such insurance shall be procured from an in-
sured authorized to do business in California. CITY shall be named
as an additional insured. In addition, ENGINEER shall obtain Work-
er's Compensation Insurance covering all of its employees as re-
quired by law. ENGINEER shall obtain professional liability insur-
ance in the amount of 1 million |$1,000,000) per occurrence and an-
nual aggregate. ENGINEER shall provide CITY with satisfactory
evidence that such insurance has been renewed and that the re-
quired premium or premiums have been paid. Certificates of Insur-
ance shall be filed with CITY and shall contain provisions that
CITY will be given thirty 130) days written notice in advance of
cancellation of any policy of insurance."
IMPLEMENTATION
The CITY shall provide ENGINEER with written notice in advance of the
date at which these services are to be implemented if different that the
date of the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
be executed by the duly authorized officers the day and year first above
written in this agreement.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Mayor
Clerk
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
Vice President
Secretary
Approved:
City
A1811:22
EXHIBIT "A"
~J:LLDAH ASSOCZATES
S~ULE OF HOORLY RA~
August 1, 1989 -3une 30, 1990
Classification
e~q~neerfnq
St. Consultant
Principal Engineer
Dlvisfon Manager
C~ty Engineer
Pro, eat DXrector
St. Engfneer
St. Project Manager
Project Manager
Associate Engineer
Sr. Designer (CADD)
Designer (CADD)
Supervising Engineer
E~g~eer~ng Associate
St. Designer
St. Design Engineer
Design Engineer
st. Drafter
St. Drafter. (CADD)
Drafter (CADD)
z,v-~_t ~al J~Lde
f~.-Publio Works Observation
Dr. Public Works Observer
Publto Works Obeerver
Dr. R~X PFap(c~ Agent
Enal. ~ Agent
As~i~tent ~al Pro~rty Agent
~. 81~cin~ DJ. str].crt~__ ServJ. oe.
SpooXa]. D:l. lt:r].otS Analyst: XX ,
speoJ. aX D].str:l.ots Ana].yst X
Fee Rate
Per Hour
$125. O0
110. O0
100. O0
100. O0
95 · O0
82.00
82.00
75.00
73.00
73.00
68. O0
90.00
73.00
68. O0
59 · 00
SS. 00
57. O0
52. O0
57. O0
52. O0
45. O0
38. O0
72. O0
62 · O0
S2. O0
90. O0
75. O0
62 · O0
90. O0
75.00
75. O0
62. O0
62. O0
85. O0
78. O0
140. O0
185. O0
90.00
75.00
62.00
5:2.00
~chedule of Hourly Rates
Xugus~ 3.989
Page 2
Prlnc~pa! Planner
Sr. Planner
Planning Associate
Planntnq Ass~s~nt
Planning Technician
ComBunity Development Services Coordinator
St. CoBraunity Development Spec~al~st
Commml~y Developnent Spec~alist
Plan Check Engineer
Plans Examiner
Spvsr. Building Inspection
Building Inspector
St. Pe~Ltt Special~st
Permit Spec~alist
Associate Landscape Architect
Assetant Landscape Architect
cauputer Tlne
Hanager-C~er 0pera~tons
St. Boftvare Engineer
Br. x.c~u Analyst
..c~.._u Analyst
Fee Rate
Pe~ Ho-r
$ 93.. 00
75.00
68.00
57.00
42.00
82.00
68.00
57. O0
73.00
63.00
66.00
56.00
51.00
40.00
82 · 00
68 · 00
62 · 00
52.00
35.00
75. O0
'62.00
62 · O0
52 · O0
42 · O0
38. O0
Word Processing 35.00
Oonsulta~ton in ccenec~on with 11~lgatton and court appearances
v111 be quoted seperately.
Additional bllltng olaamt~l~at~ons may. be added to the
11sting durlng the your as new po!lttons az~ araat~i.
at 1.25 tLmel the st-,tnA*,'d ~Lourly rat. el. BlmdayI and holidays v111 -
bl CfMIZ'gld at, 1.70 ~ the
labor ad~Jus~nerr~ end ~,her Am:Teases in o~.her
April 27, 1990
Mr. Joseph P. Hreha
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Mr. Hreha:
Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Pursuant to our discussion and your request on April 20, 1990, I
have met with Mr. Ron Espalin and several of his staff members
representing WILDAN and Associates, your contract city engineer
and planning staff. Our discussion centered around the question
of the distribution of responsibilities and the performance of
certain mandated duties. Our intent was to identify the sum of
all tasks which must be accomplished and to determine how best to
transition from county to city. We believe that certain
responsibilities currently performed by my department should,
from the standpoint of how those things typically work best in a
city, become the responsibility of your city engineer and
planner, (WILDAN and Associates).
LAND USE CODE ENFORCEMENT:
Specifically, we believe WILDAN should assume responsibility for
the maintenance and utilization of all land use records and maps,
and that the review of all applications for permits should become
the responsibility of your planning staff. Further, those same
planning staff members should assume responsibility for the
performance of field inspections and to ensure all appropriate
planning requirements are in fact complied with prior to permit
or occupancy as the case may dictate.
GRADING CODE ENFORCEMENT:
We believe your city engineer (WILDAN) can and should assume
responsibility for the review of plans, issuance of grading
permits and performance of the necessary grading inspections.
Again, this function is typically the responsibility of the city
engineer in most cities and is directly related to the design,
construction and maintenance of off site roads and drainage
facilities within the city.
(CONTINUED)
Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020
CITY OF TEMECULA - April 27, 1990 Page 2
STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW:
We believe this function is typically the responsibility of the
building official. I believe you have two basic options in this
matter: (1) You may choose to contract for some or all of the
services; (2) You may choose to hire your own staff. Mr.
Espalin has indicated to me that WILDAN is interested in assuming
that additional contract responsibility. If you desire, and if
my Board and your Council approves on the other hand, my
department can also serve as a contractor beyond June 30, 1990,
and continue to perform that task.
BUILDING INSPECTION CODE ENFORCEMENT:
Again, WILDAN and I agreed and believe that this function is
typically the responsibility of the building official, and as in
the case of structural plan review, these services may be
performed after June 30, 1990, by your contractor or by your own
staff. As in the case of structural plan review, we will be
happy to respond as a contractor with approval from my Board.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:
Certain administrative and logistical questions were discussed as
they relate to the provision of the services described above. I
will briefly summarize below:
1. Contract Form, Duration, and Costs
Speaking only for my department, contract form is dictated by
my Board through the office of our County Counsel. In most
cases, I have little say in these matters. The specifics
concerning duration of a contract and the mechanisms for
termination typically are for one or more years, and termina-
tion of a contract can occur by either party within 30 days
following written notification. Our costs are determined for
us by the Office of the Auditor-Controller on an annual basis
and these same costs are used to set our fees annually. Our
rates for fiscal year 1990-1991 would be as follows:
Structural Plan Review .......... $ 44.94 per hour
Building Inspection .......... $ 39.25 per hour
2. Equipment
We can provide our own office furniture, personal equipment
and vehicles as a part of our contract services. There would
not be an added cost except for vehicle mileage and security.
The rate for vehicle mileage is $.29 per mile and that cost,
as in the case of man/hour costs would be billed monthly.
(CONTINUED)
CITY OF TEMECULA - April 27, 1990 Page 3
3. Office Space and Vehicle Security
If you contract with our department, I assume you will want
our staff to occupy office space directly adjoining your
planning and city engineering staff. For the sake of
convenience to the public, the need for close coordination
between city and contract staff, and in order for city
management to exercise adequate control, I cannot imagine an
acceptable alternative. Our vehicles are parked nightly at a
local private property which is fenced, well lighted and
under the observation of a night watchman. Our cost per ve-
hicle is $187.00 per month. We would bill that amount along
with mileage and man/hours.
Staffing
We can provide the staff necessary to generally meet the
level of service which your council establishes through the
assignment of one Building Inspector III (Senior Building
Inspector), as the lead inspector, and as many Building In-
spector II's (Combination/Journey level) as our senior and
your building official agree is necessary from time to time.
I would prefer not providing a staff member to act as your
building official. I believe the person should be an
appointee of the City or perhaps a contract responsibility of
WILDAN.
5. Miscellaneous
For the sake of simplicity, I propose that City staff,
(Finance, typically), collect all fees and provide all ac-
counting. I further propose that City provide clerical sup-
port. Of course, technical and professional staff would need
to train clerical on questions of procedure, etc.; however,
our experience in these matters in the past has generally
been positive. If City needs for us to provide clerical
staff, we can do that of course.
Phasing
For the sake of simplicity, I propose County Building and
Safety continue with our present system through June 30,
1990. During this same period, City, WILDAN, and County can
identify, train, and/or hire staff, purchase equipment and
supplies, install tenant improvements and telephone equipment.
(CONTINUED)
CITY OF TEMECULA - April 27, 1990 Page 4
Effective after July 1, 1990, County Building and Safety will be
moved into City offices and will begin work as a separate,
contract entity from County unincorporated staff. Operationally,
my senior inspector and his staff will be under the direct super-
vision of the City's designated building official.
On an as needed or on a monthly basis, we can meet to discuss
contract implementation, strengths and shortcomings. If for
whatever reason either party feels the contract is not
beneficial, that party could serve notice for termination within
30 days.
In summary, I sincerely trust this proposal will address your
needs. Our intent is to provide you adequate support to
facilitate a smooth and effective transition. I believe we do
most things very well. Occasionally, we too, make a mistake,
hire a personality not suitable for serving the public, or worse.
We always attempt to address a problem head on and assist the
public without at the same time compromising our position as
the code enforcement agency.
In closing, let me remind you I serve at the pleasure of the
Board. If, in fact, you are interested in our services, an
appropriate official of the City of Temecula needs to communicate
that to my Board. I will await further word from you on your
decision.
Sincerely,
Director of Building and Safety
THI/dc
cc: Walt P. Abraham, Supervisor, District 1
Melba Dunlap, Supervisor, District 2
Kay Ceniceros, Supervisor, District 3
Patricia "Corky" Larson, Supervisor, District 4
A. Norton Younglove, Supervisor, District 5
Gary Cottrell, County Administrative Officer
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
HTG:
DEPT:
#"~$ TITLE: DEPT HD
6/26190 Tr'aiT~ lmprovemen~
C.M. CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
RECOMM1OqDATION:
That City Council appropriate $200,000 fTom contingency and direct the City Manager to
implement a short-term program to expedite traffic safety studies and improvements.
BACKGROUND:
Council previously designated Councilmember Lindematts to meet with the City Manager and
Max Gillis to discuss how the City can get faster action on traffic improvement projects.
The result of that meeting is the following recommendation:
It is suggested that the Council prepare a list of priority projects and direct the City
Manager to expedite an action program.
Projects to be considered could include but are not limited to the following:
1. i~ncho C'~iifornia Ro~d Eliminate deficiencies between Front 'Street and
Margarita Road by widening, striping, signing and redesign.
2. Moraga Road ,t Temecula Middle School - Finish full width street and install
traffic controls for the school.
P~!:~ Road Bridge - Prepare report giving status of bridge replacement and
recommend an action program for short-term and long-term action.
I-Iighw~ 79 and pala Road - Recommend an interim traffic design to increase
safety.
Highway 79 South - Make a study to provide adequate signs and markings for
in~ctions and traffic warnings.
Winchester R~d - Develop a plan to expedite Assessment District construction
and recommend immediate safety measures such as widening, striping, signing,
and re-route driveways.
Nicolx~ - Winchester Intersection - Come up with intersection improvements such
as widening, left turn pockets, signs, etc. to improve traffic safety.
Traffic Improvements Report
City Council Agenda- June 26, 1990
Page 2.
1-15 Interchanges - Prepare report on how to improve traffic flow through 1.15
interchanges, what is planned and when. Present designs for additional
interchanges or ramp relocations.
r~rivew-4y Policy - Present policy proposal to restrict number of driveways on
major streets.
10. ~lIeed Studies - Initiate traffic counts and speed zone studies on major streets.
11.
Circulation Pl:~rt - Initiate a study to build a bypass arterial street on the west side
of the City.
FISCAL IMPACT
It is recommended that $200,000 be appropriated to hire an expeditor, conduct traffic studies
and finance immediate improvements. If approved, reports will be prepared and brought to
Council for action as was done on the Calle Medusa project.
FDA:jsg
&GBMD&
TBIfBOULIk OONMUIIZTY IBRVZGBS DZBTRZ~"T
JUllB :16; 3.990
LindeBans, Moore, Muff. z,
Parks, Birdsall
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of June 12, 1990 as mailed.
o
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve ~e attach~ A~e~ent for Haint~nce of
Par~ays~tween Harl~rough~velopnent~oration and
CSD.
~cl~on T~c~087g
3.1 Au~orize ~e CSD ~esident to execute ~e Deed
acceptance. ~
~ATX~:
4.1 Receive and review ~e T~cula C~ity Se~ices
Dis~ict Budget as revised in co~ection wi~ Zone A.
5.1
Receive and revievtheEngineer·s Revised Report prepared
by Willdan & Associates relating to fees and charges in
the Temecula Conunity Service Distriot for District
se~vicem d~ing Ziscal 1990-1991,
o
6.1
Approve an agreement between the TCSD and the County of
Riverside for administration of CSD functions and
authorize the President of the CSD Board to sign the
documents.
MIlltiERS RB~ORT
DZRBG~TOR8 R~ORTS
ADq70~
Next Meeting: July 10, 1990, 8:00 PM, Temecula Conunity Center,
28816 PuJol Street, Tenecula, California
MINUTEB OF ~ REGULAR MEETING
OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICEB DISTRICT
HELD JUNE 12v 1999
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was
called to order at 8:10 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California. President Pat Birdsall
presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz,
Parks, Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were city Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott
F. Field and June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTB
H. Steve Sander, 40213 Holden Circle, made an appeal to the
Community to clean up Temecula so the city could have a clean start
on July 1, 1990.
CSD BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Director Mufioz, seconded by Director Parks to
approve the minutes of May 8, 1990 and May 22, 1990, as
mailed. The motion was unanimously carried.
Facilities Use Agreement for Temecula Communitv Service
District an~ Temecula Valley Unifie~ 8chool District
City Manager Aleshire stated he received a letter from CSA-143
requested that the Council approve the agreement with Temecula
School District. Mr. Aleshire explained that this agreement
has been entered into previously between CSA-143 and the
School District to coordinate summer programs and use of the
pool.
Director Lindemans asked if CSA-143 would administer this
program. President Birdsall stated that Temecula COmmunity
Services District (TCSD) has contracted with the County
Service Area (CSA) to administer these programs for six
months.
-- CSD Minutes June 12. 1990
Director Lindemansquestioned the 30-day cancellation clause.
City Manager Aleshire stated this agreement covers more than
just one program, and the 30-day period is needed by the
School District. Mr. Aleshire said this agreement needs to be
ratified by July 1, 1990.
Director Mufioz moved, Director Moore seconded a motion to
approve the agreement.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz,
Parks, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Publio Rearina for T.C.S.D.
City Manager Aleshire recommended continuing the public
hearing to July 10, 1990 and approving staff recommendations
as follows:
3.1
Revise the CSD Budget and proposed Rates and Charges to
take into account new financial information obtained from
the County and CSA:
3.2 Provide published and mailed notice of the Public Hearing
on the proposed Rates and Charges;
3.3
Draft a Fact Sheet to be included with the Hearing
Notice, explaining the purpose of the Rates and Charges;
3.4
Reset the date of the public hearing to 8:00 PM on July
10, 1990 at the Community Center;
3.5 Hire such consultants as are necessary to accomplish the
above; and,
3.6 Continue this Meeting to June 19, 1990.
Mr. Aleshire explained the request for the extension of time
was for the following reasons:
Budget has to be increased to allow for additional costs
for landscaping. A new budget has been worked out and
will be presented June 19, 1990. Final adoption of the
budget would be scheduled for July 10, 1990.
CSD Minutes June 12. 1990
The original recommendation was to publish a notice in
the newspaper. The recommendation has now changed to
send a mailed notice to every landowner in the City.
Director Moore asked if there would be time to get this
information to the County Assessor. City Manager Aleshire
stated the City has a month in which to do this.
Director Mu~oz asked why the recommendation has been changed
to mail notices instead of publishing a notice in the
newspaper. City Attorney Fields explained he did not feel
notification in the newspaper would be legally sound.
City Attorney Fields stated he would also be recommending an
appeal procedure, giving land owners ample time after
notification is received to present a hardship case. Mr.
Fields explained that the appeal would first go to the City
Manager, and if not resolved to the City Council. He stated
a proposal with a resolution establishing rates and charges
along with an appeal procedure is forthcoming.
Director Mu~oz asked that an objective criteria be deveoped,
defining what a hardship case is.
City Attorney Fields explained that there are two basic types
of hardship cases:
Any potential inequities between parcels. He explained
there may be circumstances where the amount of fee would
be greater than benefits received. An example may be in
the case of an undeveloped custom lot, where the amount
of land would carry a greater fee than a single housing
unit.
2. Means based hardship. (i.e. Senior Citizens)
President Birdsall asked if this should come from the City
Manager to the Parks and Recreation Commission, and then to
the City Council.
City Manager Aleshire stated alternatives will be presented at
the next meeting. He said this formula will be improved next
year, based upon the findings of the appeal procedure.
It was moved by Director Mu~oz, seconded by Director Parks to
continue the public hearing to July 10, 1990 and approve staff
recommendations 3.1 through 3.5.
~ CSD Minutes June 12. 1990
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
REPORT
City Manager Aleshire stated the City had received four offers by
various developers to donate land for parks. Because of the need
to determine if the land is usable for parks, Willdan has been
retained to do a study to evaluate these proposals. He stated a
study is needed to analyze the Park and Recreation Master Plan, the
conditions of development in order to make a decision to accept an
offer. Within 30 days a report will be given on this issue.
A report will also be forthcoming that gives the CSD Board criteria
for when to accept dedications of property.
City Manager Aleshire said interviews have been held for Park and
Recreation Director. He said these candidates have been referred
to Mr. Dixon, who will make the final selection.
Mr. Aleshire distributed a letter to the Board of Supervisors which
talks about extending the CSA-143 services to the CSD after July 1,
1990. An agreement to continue these services was not been
finalized. Because the County Board of Supervisors needs to act
before July 1, 1990, the letter must be sent to the County. He
asked the CSD Board for any comments before the letter goes out.
CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Parks stated a time needs to be set for interviewing the
Parks and Recreation Commission applicants. The time was set for
Saturday, June 16, 1990 at 8:00 AM.
CSD Minutes June 12. 1990
Director Mufioz asked that the City explore the possibilities of a
bike path system throughout the City. He also asked that the
possibility of coordinating with the Temecula School District and
using one of the school buses to take high school age children to
the beach in the summertime be explored. President Birdsall said
that the City of Monrovia is doing this at the present time very
successfully and has offered assistance in setting up a program in
Temecula.
Director Moore asked that the feasibility of building a skate board
ramp, perhaps at the Sports Park, be looked into.
President Birdsall asked the status of the dedication of Sam Hicks
Park to the City, and if funds were allocated for the maintenance
of this park. City Manager Aleshire stated it is in the budget for
maintenance for a full year. He said the deeds are awaiting a
preliminary title report which has been ordered, and as soon as the
titled is cleared, it will be on the agenda. The plan is to get it
approved by the 4th of July so a presentation could be made in
connection with the ceremonies.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Mufioz to
adjourn at 8:50 PM.
Next Meeting: Saturday, June 16, 1990, 8:00 AM, Temecula City
Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
F. D. Aleshire, Secretary
AB#:
HTG:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TITLE: CONSENT CALENDAR
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF PARKWAYS
TR 23100 AND TR 23101
DEPT HD '~
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
RECOMMENDATION
That the Temecula Community Services District (CSD) Board APPROVE the
attached Agreement For Maintenance of Parkways between Marlborough
Development Corporation and CSD.
DISCUSSION
This agreement between Marlborough Development Corporation and the City of
Temecula is for the purpose of establishing a permanent maintenance agreement
of parkways in and around TR 23100 and TR 23101. These tracts are located
north of Rancho California Road, east of Meadows Parkway, and south of La
Serena Way. Several phases of each tract have recorded and are currently under
construction. This area is more commonly known as Chardonnay Hills.
Under the agreement, Marlborough will be required to improve the parkways with
landscaping, install and maintain an irrigation system for the purposes of
watering the parkways, and will maintain the parkways in a clean and attractive
manner. Marlborough will bear all the costs and expenses of installing and
maintaining the landscaping and irrigation systems at no cost or expense to the
City. Marlborough agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from claims
resulting from any work undertaken as a result of the agreement. All work in the
parkways will be undertaken under Ordinance ~00 (adopted by the City under
Ordinance No. 1).
Marlborough Development Corporation intends to assign this agreement to a
homeowner's association at such time 51% of the lots in each phase have been sold.
Individual assessments will be recorded in the CCSR's sufficient to provide for
continuous maintenance of parkways. The assessments will carry with the sale
of any individual lot. The agreement also provides the City with the ability to
maintain the parkways and place a special assessment on the tax bills of individual
lot owners in the event that the homeowner's association fails to maintain
parkways.
STAFF CONCERNS
None
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
:AB#:
,MTG:
DEPT:
TITLE:
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF PARKWAYS
TR 23100 $ TR 23101
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
Sully
The attached agreement for Maintenance of Parkways between Marlborough
Development Corporation and the City of Temecula is submitted for approval by
the City Council.
10725.006 CCR848M 061290
Recording requested by and
when recorded return to:
HOLZWARTH, POWELL & STEIN
18400 Yon Karman Avenue
Suite 600
Irvine, California 92715
Attention= Thomas L. Powell, Esq.
(Space Above For Recorder's Use Only)
AGREEMENT FOR
MAINTENANCE OF PARKWAYS
THIS AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF PARKWAYS ("Agree-
ment") is entered into this day of ,
1990, by and between MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Cali-
fornia corporation ("Marlborough"), and the TEHECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICE DISTRICT ("District").
RECITALS:
A. Marlborough is the owner and developer of that
certain real property commonly known as "Chardonnay Hills" and as
more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
("Project");
B. Certain parkways belonging to the District are
located contiguous to the Project and/or within Parcel Map 22554,
as more particularly depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto
("Parkways");
C. Marlborough desires to improve the Parkways in
conjunction with developing the Project~ and
D. Marlborough and the District wish to establish an
agreement respecting the permanent maintenance of the Parkways.
NOW, THEREFORE, upon the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties agree as follows:
1. Duties of Marlborough. Marlborough shall improve
the Parkways by landscaping the Parkways in a clean and attrac-
tive manner and shall install an irrigation system for the put-
poses of watering such Parkways. Marlborough shall obtain the
approval of the Road Commissioner, i.e., Acting City Engineer,
for the landscaping plan and the irrigation system prior to the
installation thereof. Following completion of the installation of
the Parkways landscaping and irrigation system, Marlborough shall
maintain the Parkways in a clean and attractive condition. Except
as otherwise provided herein, the costs and expenses involved in
the installation of the landscaping and irrigation system and the
costs and expenses of maintaining the Parkways shall be borne
entirely by Marlborough with no cost or expense to the District.
2. Liability for Negligence. Marlborough, or its
assignee, agrees to indemnify, defend and save the District, its
authorized agents, officers, representatives and employees, harm-
less from and against any and all penalties, liabilities or loss
resulting from claims or court action and arising out of any
accident, loss or damage to persons or property happening or
occurring as a proximate result of any work undertaken pursuant
to this Agreement, including any allegation that the landscaping
caused, or contributed to causing, death or injury to person or
property.
3. County Ordinance No. 499. Marlborough and the
District acknowledge that County Ordinance No. 499, as amended
from time to time (the "Ordinance"), creates certain restrictions
and responsibilities upon those seeking an encroachment permit.
The parties hereby incorporate the terms and provisions of such
Ordinance by this reference as if said Ordinance was set forth
herein in its entirety. Marlborough shall obtain all permits
required by Ordinance No. 499 prior to commencing any work on the
Parkways within the street right of way.
4. Assignment of Association. Marlborough, as the
developer of Chardonnay Hills, hereby covenants and represents
that, following the execution of this Agreement, it shall form or
cause to be formed a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation to be
known as #Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association" ("Associa-
tion") and shall cause all the rights, duties and obligations
established pursuant to this Agreement to be assumed by the Asso-
ciation which shall then become responsible for the maintenance
of the Parkways. Until such time as at least fifty-one (51%) of
the lots in each phase of the Project have been transferred to
purchasers, who shall be members of the Association, Marlborough
shall guarantee the obligations of the Association. Marlborough
hereby represents and warrants that it shall submit to the City
of Temecula for approval and thereafter record a Declaration of
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, and Reservation of Ease-
ments encumbering Chardonnay Hills (the "Declaration") containing
provisions clarifying and requiring that the Association shall
assume all duties, responsibility and liability for the Parkways
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Further, Marlborough
agrees to provide in such Declaration that the duty to pay
assessments sufficient to provide for the continued maintenance
of the Parkways will run with the land on the sale of any lot.
The Declaration shall also contain provisions allowing the Dis-
trict: (a) to maintain the Parkways and place a special assess-
ment on the tax bills of the individual lot Owners in the event
that the Association fails to do sol and (b) to remove any or all
-2-
EXHIBIT #A"
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
The Project shall mean and refer to that certain real
property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside,
State of California, depicted on Tentative Tract Maps 23100,
23101, 23102 and 23103.
Page 1 of i Page
EXHIBIT "B"
DEPICTION OF THE
PARKWAYS
(see attached)
Page 1 of 2 Pages
MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORA T/ON
PHASING MAP
E',,YH/~ / T '2~ "
70 B£ R~C~£D IN~ FIIJAL 7~CT MAPS LI$7~D
· I
"1 '~3~o3 II!
i. o
of the landscaping or irrigation system if the Association fails
to do so upon request by the District, and to place a special
assessment on the tax bills of the individual lot Owners for the
cost thereof.
6. Survival of Obligations. Marlborough covenants
that it shall not cause the dissolution or abandonment of the
Association which will result in there being no person or entity
which shall be obligated to fulfill the obligations established
pursuant to this Agreement.
7. Amenclments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall
be made only by the written approval of both of the parties here-
to.
8. California Law. It is the intention of the parties
that the laws of the State of California govern the validity of
this Agreement, the construction of its terms and the interpreta-
tion of the rights and duties of the parties.
9. Parties in Interest. Each and all of the cove-
nants, terms, provisions, and agreements herein contained shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors,
administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties
hereto.
10. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement constitutes
the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto
with respect to the subject matter hereof, and there are no
agreements, undertakings, restrictions or warranties among the
parties other than those set forth herein and herein provided
for.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this
Agreement on the day and year first above written.
"MARLBOROUGH"
MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
a California corporation
BY: ts :'
Dated: , 19
"DISTRICT"
TEMECULA COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT
BY:
Its:
-3-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) sso
COUNTY OF ~v~-/f~iZ~- )
On n~an~_ /~ , 1990, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public d for said State, personally appeared
known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evi-
dence) to be the persons who executed the within instr~ent
behalf of ~LBOROUGH D~ELOP~T CO~TION, /the cor~ration
therein n~ed, and acknowledged to me that said cor~ration exe-
cuted the within instrument pursuant to its By-Laws or a resolu-
tion of its Board of Directors.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OFF1CL~L S ~.14L
' DEBRA HOUSTON
,~ NOTARY PUBL!C - CALIFORNIA
~ ORANGE COUNTY
4~ My Corem Expii'e~, J~r~. 2~), 199
(PLEASE ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR DISTRICT)
Riverside County Service Area t43
JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR
29377 Rancho California Roocl, Suite t05 - Temecula, CA 92390
[7~4) 699-0235
DATE: June 13, 1990
TO:
FRON:
June Greek - City of Te~ecula Deputy Cler~.~.~__~~E-~,
Rebecca L. Stein - CSA 163 Supervisin_e Office Assistant I
Te~ecula Community Service District Agenda Tte~s for June 26, 1990
Please find attached the CSA 163 Staff Report for Completion of the Process for
Dedication for Tract 20879, Vineyards by The Costa Group.
This office requests this item to be placed on the Temecula Community Service
District Agenda for June 26, 1990.
Should there be seme reason this item can not be approved on this date please
notify this office ismediately. The Developer has been notified the CSA will
assmee ~aintenance responsibility when approved by the Temecula Cmsmunity Service
District Board.
Riverside County Service Area 143
JEANINE R. OVERSON, DIRECTOR
29377 Rancho California Road, Suite t05 - Temecula, CA 92390
[7t4) 699-0235
DATE:
TO:
FItON:
3true 13, 1990
Temecula Co~unity Service District
.Riverside County Service Area 1~3 (~.
3eanine R. Overson - Director ~~
Report for ~une 26, 1990 TSCD Ne~ting
Completion of Process for Dedication
Tract 20879
Vineyards by The Costa Group
The CSA l&3 requests the TCSD to sign and record the legal documents for the
above tract as soon as ~ossible, therefore, enabling the CSA to commence
maintenance on these areas i~mediatelv. This will complete the Process for
Dedication.
All legals have been reviewed and approved by Riverside County Counsel and
Building Services and also by the City of Temecula staff.
Recorded at reques~ of and return to:
Departmint of Bm'ldin~ Services
Real Property Mann.meat Division
3133 7th ~
Riverside, Califmnia 92507
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is fo~ tbe benefit of
112 Cmmly of Riverside and is entitled
Is be recorded without fee.
(C, ovt Code 6103).
Parccl: g~3-21--04
Ptoject:'1I'~ ~
~ 20879
EASEMENT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, recei~ of whirl: is hereby nck.owledged, ~
~ NO. ~0879, A t'~_T.~A T.TMT'I"'~ PAR'I'qg~P
("GRANTOR") hereby grants and conveys to the
City of Temecula Comaunity Service District ("GRANTEE"), together with the right to
further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way
for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and land-
scaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the
~ounty of ILiverside, State of California, more particularly described in "Exhibit A"
attached hereto, which is ini6rporated herein by this reference.(the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmenta~itcy, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable
incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easemnt Area, maintenance shall, after.notice,
become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this ease-
Bent extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns of the GRAHTOR.
EXHIBIT
DuSCRIPTZON t'
IN THE INCORPORATED AREA OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF TEHBCULA, DBSCRIBED AS FOLLOWSt
BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 3 THROUGH 22, OF TRACT 20879-1, AS
SHONE BY HAP ON FILE IN BOOK 165, PAGES 96 THROUGH IOO OF HAPS,
RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY
DBSCRIBED AS FOLLO#St
THE SOUTHEASTERLYAND SOUTHERLY 15 FEET OF LOT 1; THE SOUTHEASTERLY
20 FEET OF LOTS 3 & 4~ THE SOUTHEASTERLY 25 FEET OF LOTS 5 & 6; THE
SOUTHEASTERLY 27 FEET OF LOTS 7 & 8; THE SOUTHEASTERLY 30 FEET OF
LOT 9; THE SOUTHEASTERLY 33 FEET OF LOTS 10 THROUGH 12; THE
SOUTHEASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOTS 13 & 14; THE SOUTHEASTERLY 27 FEET
OF LOT 15; THE SOUTHEASTERLY 25 FEET OF LOTS 16 THROUGH 18; THE
SOUTHEASTERLY 22 FEET OF LOTS 19 THROUGH 21; THE SOUTHEASTERLY 20
FEET OF LOT 22.
SEE EXHIBIT B, ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE HADE A PART
HEREOF.
VIlEYARD%LEGAL.DES
i
(~
1'his is to ~artify that the 'interst in real property conveyed by the vithin deed
to ~h~ ClW. O~~, a political corporation and/or soyarmlets1 a~ency, is
bereby accept~ by order of the Board of the T~CULACO~ITY SERVICES DISTRICT
on the date below and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly
authorized officer.
Date:
Patricia R. Birdsall, President
Vineyards - ~ 20879
a C~l..tfornia T.t~tt. ad ~p
The Omta Oroup, a cal~orrna
T-imt~__~d Partnership
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO}
On this 18th day of ~ , 1990, before me, the undersigned, a
Jotary Public in and for said State, personally appeared #ILLIAN J. KOLL and
JOAN JAMKOWSKI, personally known to Be (or proved to Be on the basis of
satisfactory evidence), to be the persons who executed the within instrument
as President and Vice President/Secretary, on behalf of COSTA DEVELOPHENT
CORPORATION, the corporation herein named, and acknowledged to me that said
corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a
resolution of its board of directors, said corporation being known to me to
be the General Partner of COSTA GROUP, a California Limited Partnership, the
limited partnership that execbted the within instrument, said partnership
being known to Be to the General Partner of VIlEYARDS TRACT lO. 2e879, a
california Limited Partnership, that executed the within instrument, and
further acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as such
partner of the limited partnership known to be the General Partner of the
partnership that executed the same.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA i PORT
COlOrUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BUDGET
RECONI~ENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of Directors for the Community
Services District approve the preliminary budget as amended for
Zone A.
B~C~GROUND
CSD Coordinator Bill Holley has prepared an agenda report which
explains the change in the Zone A budget.
Attached is the new total budget for the Community Services
District.
Parks Budget $1,564,838
Zone A 838,618
Zone B 75,775
Total:
Estimated Fund
Balance July 1, 1990
ATTACHMENT
CSD Preliminary Budget
$2,479,231
$ 822,000
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
BUDGET 8UMH]~Y
Estimated Fund Balance July 1, 1990
Estimated Revenues:
Community Services
Zone A:
Assessments
Refuse Credit
Total Zone A
Zone B
Total Estimated Revenues
Total Resources
Appropriations:
Community Services
Zone A
Zone B
Total Appropriations
Reserve for Contingency
838,618
(239.588)
1,564,838
599,030
75.775
1,564,838
838,618
75.775
$822,000
2.239.643
3,061,643
(2.479.231)
$ 582,412
AB#: c-~D~ 4
MTG: q,-~-'-,,-
DEPT: r_so
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TITLE: CSD
Engineer's Report
DEPT
CITY
CITY HGR
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council review and approve revised Engineer's Report and set Tuesday, July 17,
1990 at 7:00 PM at Temecula High School as time and place for public hearing.
BACKGROUND:
A Council Sub-Committee of Mayor Parks and Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans met with
staff on June 20, 1990 to review assessment spread and formula.
The Committee is recommending a new formula which they feel will be a more equitable
comparison of original and revised assessment. 6/21/90
OLD NEW
EDU $ % EDU $ %
Single Family DU 1 30 1 34
Apts DU 1/2 15 34 3/4 25
Vacant ResidentialAC 4 120 2 68
30
Agricultural AC 4 120 10 1/2 17 2
Comm/Industrial AC
Vacant Comm/Indus AC
4 120 56 6 203
4 120 4 135
DU=
AC=
EDU=
$=
%=
Dwelling Unit
Acre
Equivalent Dwelling Unit
Assessment per DU or acre
Percent of Total Levy ($1,556,000)
CTI'Y OF TEMECULA
AGENDA I I ORT
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT CONTRA CT ADMINISTRATION
I~Z~T ID
RECOMMENDA T/ON
It is recommended that Temecula Community Services District Board
approve an agreement between the Temecula Community Services
District (TCSD) and the County of Riverside for administration of CSD
functions and authorize President to sign documents.
BACKGROUND
During budget hearings, Council requested a contract be made with
Community Service Area 143 (CSA 143) to provide administrative
services from July 1, 1990 to December 31, 1990.
The attached agreement is submitted by the County to continue
operating the parks and recreation program within the City.
County will be responsible for park and recreation administration and
maintenance at Sports Park, Sam Hicks Park, and for contracting for
landscape maintenance in Zone A.
The City will assume responsibility for paying street light charges to
Southern California Edison Company and for administering various
functions which deal with capital outlay programs, preparation of Park
and Recreation Master Plan, and the like.
The City will hire a Park and Recreation Director in July or August, and
that person will develop a plan for transition from County to City
administration during the next six months.
FISCAL IMPACT
The preliminary budget for CSD 143 is $2.4 million, of which $1.2
million is for services to be administered by the CSA.
The City will pay $16,000 per month for County administration cost and
also will pay for contract services directly rendered within the city limits,
such as ground maintenance.
CITY OF TEMECULA
MelllOralidulli
TO:
FROM:
Mel Bohlken, CSA 143
Frank Aleshire, City Manager
DATE:
June 15, 1990
SUBJECT:
Temecula Maintenance Contract
The County Service District (CSD) budget for 1990-91 is $2.479 million. Projects administered
by City staff total $1.201 million.
Capital outlay
Street lights, Zone B
Street lights, Zone A
City overhead
Assessment Engineering
Consulting
Newsletter
Total
$ 622,495
75,775
160,188
198,244
45,000
72,000
28.000
$1,201,702
County staff will be responsible for administering $1.278 million operations and maintenance
projects for the fiscal year. If we assume a 15 % overhead cost, the City would pay the district
a total of $172,000 a year or $16,000 per month.
To simplify accounting procedures connected with the contract, I recommend the County draw
up a contract agreement to provide as follows:
Temecula Community Service District will pay the County $16,000 per month for
administration of CSD activities.
The City will pay direct contract cost for all maintenance agreements for services
performed within Temecula Community Services District boundaries.
3. Contract may be terminated on a 30-day notice.
The City intends to hire a Park and Recreation Director in July. That person will be responsible
for developing a take over plan with the County and hire sufficient staff to assume the total
operation within 6 months. Because the County operation will extend for only a three or four
month period, we should keep the process as simple as possible.
FA:sjf ·
~_ 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
.... 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.'ILLIAM C. KATZENSTE1N
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE ~00
S$~ - 10TH STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR OPERATION OF THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUNCTIONS
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the
County of Riverside ('County') and the Temecula Community Services
District ('CSD') for the purpose of providing CSD with assistance
in administering the contracts, maintaining the property,
implementing staffing park programs, and generally overseeing the
operations of the activities previously included within County
Service Area No. 143 (CSA), subject to the following terms and
conditions:
1. This Agreement is to have an effective date of July 1,
1990, and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31,
1990, or unless terminated by thirty (30) days written notice by
either party prior to such expiration.
2. County shall, during the term of this Agreement,
continue to work under the direction of the CSD General Manager in
administering/implementing programs within the CSD facilities;
continue the process of reviewing dedications/acceptance of parks,
open space areas, landscaped slopes and other public use property
on behalf of CSD and generally perform those functions that CSA
staff was providing prior to the incorporation of the City of
Temecula.
3. All personnel who are employees of County shall not
perform any function not coming within the scope of the duties of
such employee in performing services for County. All personnel in
the performance of services and functions for CSD shall be County
employees, and no CSD employee shall be taken over by County. No
person employed by the County shall have any CSD pension, civil
service or other CSD or City of Temecula status or rights.
4. For the purpose of performing the aforementioned
services and functions, and for the purpose of giving official
status to the performance thereof, every County officer and
employee engaged in performing any such service or function shall
be deemed to be an officer or employee of CSD while performing
service for CSD within the scope of this Agreement.
5. CSD shall not be called upon to assume any liability for
the direct payment of any salary, wages, or other compensation to
any County personnel performing services hereunder for CSD, or, any
liability other than that provided for in this Agreement.
Except as herein otherwise specified, CSD shall not be
liable for compensation or indemnity to any County employee for
injury or sickness arising out of his employment.
6. During the term of this Agreement, CSD agrees to
compensate County at the rate of $16,000.00 per month ($523.00 per
day) for services rendered on behalf of the CSD.
-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7. CSD is to pay for all contracts, including but not
limited to maintenance and consulting services performed within
CSD, or a pro rata share of any contracts otherwise performed on
behalf of both CSD and County.
8. County, its officers, agents, and employees, shall not
be deemed to assume any liability for the negligence of CSD, or of
any officer, agent or employee thereof, nor for any defective or
dangerous condition of the property of CSD, and CSD shall indemnify
and hold County and its officers, agents and employees harmless
from, and shall defend said County and the officers, agents and
employees thereof against, any claim or suit for damages resulting
therefrom.
8 9. Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the
parties of this Agreement will be mailed by first class mail,
9 postage prepaid, to the following addresses:
10
County of Riverside
Temecula CSD
11
12
13
14
15
CSA Administrator
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
c/o City Clerk
Post Office Box 300
Temecula, CA 92390
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CSD by order of its Board, has caused
this Agreement to be signed by its Chairman and attested and sealed
by its Clerk, and the County of Riverside, by order of its Board of
Supervisors, has caused this Agreement to be
16
17
subscribed by the Chairman of said Board and sealed and attested by
the Clerk of said Board.
18
19
2O
21
Dated:
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
22
23
By
Deputy
24 (SEAL)
25
26
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
28
'ILLIANI C. KATZENSTEIN
COUNTY COUNSEL
SUITE 300
3535 - ]0TH STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
District Clerk
By
-2-