HomeMy WebLinkAbout061990 CC Agenda TB!fBOUL~ (~IT~
d-UIIB :L9, X990 - 7z00 PM
I[~"'t, ,I n 0"4e1':
.- ' Tnvocation
Flag Salute
O~'e~ 4 nAnce: No. 90--10
Resol,,t~on:. No. 9~)-63
Peter Molster
Church of Christ
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Parks
Proclaiming June 23, 1990 as "Over
the Hill Pigskin Shootout" Day in
Temecula
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can
address the Council on items that are not listed on the
Agenda, Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you
desire to speak tothe Council about an item not listed on the
Agenda~ a pink "Request To Spelk" form should be filled out
and filed withthe City Clerk.
:When you are called to speak, please come forward and stote
your ~o~e and aa~ress.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Opoa~°* form must be
filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that
item. 'There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
-speakers.
~[O~TCI~ TO ~ PURT. TC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered
to be routine and all will'be enacted by one roll call
vote. There.will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items to be
removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
1.1
Approve mirrotes of June 5, 1990 as mailed.
03-09. buaMu~t Mo. 4
Prop~a! to subdivide an 80 acre site into 257 single family
lots,~ located. west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott
Lane, approximately 1.25 miles north of Rancho California
-Road o
'RECOMMENDATION:
Set for Public Hearing on July 24, 1990.
-An-appli~ati~n filed by Kindercare Learning Center, Inc,, to
divide 4,4 acres-located south of Margarita Road, north of
Rancho California Road, east of Lindy Way and west of Moraga
Road into ~wo parcels.
~ATION:
3.1
Receive and File Parcel Map No. 24169 , subject to
the conditions of approval.
Filed l~yMexican.PatioCafe, Inc.-to construct a 4,060 square
foot restaurant with drive-through lane service at the
northwesterly side of Jefferson Avenue approximately 1,200
feet southeast of Winchester Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and File Plot Plan No. 11338, Amended No.
2, Planning. Cor=ection No. 1, based on the findings
and subject to -.he conditions of approval contained
in.the County Staff Report.
H/14/;0
Adopt a-resolutiOn entitled.:
· J,~OLU~XOII ~0. gO-
& ~OZ, U'L'XO~ C~ ~ 4~X'A'~ 4C~)I~K~Z~ OF ~ C~X'A~ OF
~.,l.T.,X~, JU)GI~Z~G ~ ~A"AMI)ARD BP~C~XFXOJCA'ZOMB FOR
RECOM~]~TD~ON;
6.1
Authorize the NJyor to sign letter of agreement
with David F. Dixon to serve as City Manager of the
City.of TemeCula.
A p.r-'vposal to construct a 67,5'53 square foot office building
&ndatwo-storyparkinq structure (total 231 spaces needed) on
a five acre site at.the northwest corner of Rancho California
Road a~d Ynez Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Open the .public hearing, receive public-testimony
and continue the ite~ off calendar.
8,
,Wl' cq *-9% ezwl aes
Presentation by--Mr. Emmett GibBon, Chief of Animal Control,
County of Riverside.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve. a proposal from the County of Riverside to
provue Anhnal Control services to the City of
Temecula for Fiscal Year 1991, in an amount not to
exceed. S80,000.
CXT~. ~OU~CXL ~TS
Next'~eetinq: June 26, 1990, 7:00 PN, Te~ecula Co~munit¥ Center,
25516 Pujol Street, Te~ecula, California
A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TUF~ CITY OF TI~ECULA
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has a number of fine service organizations who
dedicate themselves to community programs to benefit the citizens of this community; and,
WHEREAS, the Rotary Club, Kiwanis, Optimist and other non-profit service club
members have joined together to participate in the 4th Annual "Over-The-Hill Pigskin Shoot-
Out", sponsored by the Temecula Sunrise Rotary; and,
WHEREAS, this event has been providing funds to combat drug abuse through
education of our school faculty, administrators, board members and community leaders; and
WHEREAS, the proceeds of this event will be donated to the Temecula Valley
Substance Abuse Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald D. Parks, Mayor of the City of Temecula, hereby
declare June 23, 1990 as
"OVER-THE-HILL PIGSKIN SHOOT-OUT IV" DAY
and encourage all citizens to support your local senior athletes on June 23, 1990 at 6:00 PM as
they play against Lake Elsinore at the Temecula Valley High School Stadium.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 12th day of June, 1990.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks
Mayor
June S. Greek
Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
2/Proel061290 I 06/13/90
THE TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY
PROUDLY PRESENTS...
THE 4th ANNUAL
"OVER-THE-HILL
PIGSKIN SHOOT-OUT"
When: June 23, 1990 - 6:00 p.m.
Where: Temccula Valley High School Stadium
Who: Rotary, Kiwanis, Optimist & Other Non-
Profit Service Club Members have joined
together to play against Lake Elsinore.
Why: All proceeds will be donated to the
Temecula Valley Substance
Abuse Council
Cost: Adults-S5.00 kids under 12-FREE. Buy
tickets at Stadium Sporting Goods,
Solutions, or at Gate.
CELEBRITY B~ LLPLAYERS, CHEER LF. ADERS,
FUN, ACTION, AND MUCH MUCH MOREl
CONTACT: Rocky Hill, 676-3410
Sue Thompson, 676-7082
PRESS RELEASE
WHO: (Rocky's list) Community leaders, service club members -
anyone over 30 can play in this game. Jimmy Moore is our oldest
player holding at 55 years of age. Our Temecula leaders will be
playing Lake Elsinore leaders 30 years and older.
WHAT: 4th Annual Over the Hill Pigskin Shootout. The Over-the-
Hill Pigskin Shootout began four years ago when Rocky Hill and
Judge Vic Saraydarian pooled together local service clubs and
co-munity leaders to sponsor and participate in a benefit full-
tackle football game. The Temecula Sunrise Rotary sponsors the
event and all proceeds go to combat substance abuse.
WHERE: Temecula Valley High School stadium.
WHEN: June 23, 1990 at 6:00 pm.
Tickets available by contacting any Rotary Club member,
Substance Abuse Council member, or Rocky Hill.
liE.d//
MINUTES OF ~ ~d~JOURNED REGUIJ~ MEETING
OF THE TF~ECUL~CITY COUNCIL
HELD JUNE $v 1990
An adjourned meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to
order at 7:10 PM at the Rancho California Water District, 28061
Diaz Rd., Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore Mufioz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott
F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember
Lindemans.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCL~,TIONS
A certificate of appreciated was presented to:
1. Ad Hoc Law Enforcement Negotiating Committee
2. Traffic Advisory Committee
PUBLIC COMMENTS
James Marpie, 29500 Mira Loma, asked the City Council to be aware
of the increase in urban run-off caused by new development and
urged them to deal with the problem now, before costs to correct
problems increase.
John Bell, 27711 Diaz Road, Temecula Commerce Committee, spoke
regarding sign control in the City of Temecula. He asked the
Council to give businesses an adjustment period and time to develop
amendments to the Sign Ordinance which they feel are necessary. He
said one amendment the Committee desired would be to allow
advertising with the use of balloons. Mr. Bell stated Temecula is
known for balloons and this should be a permitted use.
George Richards, 323018 Merlot Ct., expressed his concern with
increased traffic accidents and lack of control of this situation.
He also stated statistics for arrests and citations issued were
very low for this area, possibly contributing to the problem.
14 J nutes \6\5 \90 - 1 - 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
Jeff Haines, 40580 Via Diamante, spoke in favor of the proposed
Regional Park and Open Space District. He presented the City Clerk
with petitions containing names of residents of the area who favor
this District.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Mufioz requested the removal of Item No. 2 from the
Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Lindemans requested the removal of Item No. 3 from
the Consent Calendar.
1. Minutes
1.1 Minutes of May 15, 1990
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Mufioz to approve the minutes of May 15, 1990 as
mailed.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Plot Plan No. 11376
Ross Geller, Planning Director, reported this is a proposal to
construct a 7,992 square foot office building with
subterranean parking located west of Front Street and south of
First Street. Mr. Geller recommended the Council receive and
file this item.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded
a motion to receive and file Plot Plan No. 11376.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
#inutes\6\5%90 -Z- 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
Plot Plan No. 11435
Ross Geller stated this is a two story, 5,000 square foot
office building on 0.37 acres located north of Second Street
and northeast of Mercedes Street and is an adobe style
building. He said this is in the Old Town Area and has been
reviewed and approved by the Old Town Architectural Review
Committee. Mr. Geller recommended the Council receive and
file this item.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if this Committee is still
functioning. City Manager Aleshire answered that he spoke
with the current Chairman of the Committee who expressed his
interest in continuing in this capacity. Mr. Aleshire
reported the Committee will be meeting with the new Planning
Commission on June 18, 1990.
Mayor Parks stated the applicant had already gone through the
process and received approval both from the County and the Old
Town Architectural Review Committee and asked the Council to
approve this item.
Councilmember Mu5oz stated guidelines for this Committee must
be reviewed and requested a date for completing this effort.
Mr. Geller said as soon as the Committee met with the Planning
Commission, a time table would be set.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a
motion to receive and file Plot Plan No. 11436.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mu5oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
4. Parcel MaD 24058
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:37 PM.
Ross Geller reported this item was before the City Council two
weeks ago. He said the applicant asked to continue this item
off calendar so that he may prepare a plot plan. Mr. Geller
stated the original recommendation was denial of the map,
however it would be given another look when the plot plan is
# i nut es \6 \5 \90 - 3 - 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
prepared. Dale Kerlin, representing Massaro Welsh, stated he
was in agreement with this recommendation.
The public.hearing was closed at 7:39 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded
Councilmember Moore to continue this item off calendar.
by
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Consideration of Extension of Ordinance 90-08, Establishing a
~oratoriu~ on Billboards.
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM.
Ross Geller stated that on April 24, 1990, the City Council
adopted an ordinance prohibiting billboards for a period of
120 days. Mr. Geller recommended extending this ordinance for
10 months and 15 days to allow the Planning Commission time to
consider new guidelines for this form of advertising.
Mayor Parks declared the public hearing open at 7:45 PM.
There were no requests to speak on this issue and the public
hearing was closed at 7:46 PM.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a
motion to waive further reading of Ordinance 90-08.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Muhoz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
#~nutes\6\5\90 -4- 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
e
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Mufioz to adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-09
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, EXTENDING INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 90-08
PERTAINING TO REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
DISPLAYS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858(B) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Change of Zone No. 5446
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:55 PM.
Ross Geller stated this is a zone change for a 6.51 acre site
on the west side of Ynez Road at the terminus of County
Center Road, from existing IP to CPS. He recommended adopting
the negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No.
33728 and approval of change of Zone Change Application No.
5446.
Councilmember Mufioz asked the reason for the requested zone
change and what the possible impacts would be.
Ross Geller stated this was approved by the County some time
ago and consists of two parcels, one of which has an
industrial building on it. He said the probable cause for the
change of zone request is that the existing building was
vacant for over a year. He advised that Mr. Larry Markum was
available to answer questions regarding this request.
Larry Markum, Markum and Associates, stated utilities are
already installed, and this is an active plot plan. He said
the building vacancy illustrates commercial usage is more
appropriate for this area.
Councilmember Mufioz asked what type of tenants would likely be
housed in this building. Mr.'Markum responded there would be
some offices and some show room commercial. He said when the
.'- #~nutes\6\5\90 -5- 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
parcel map was approved it was originally zoned commercial and
later changed to IP.
Councilmember Mu5oz asked if this would impact the scenic
nature of the area. Mr. Markum said the building would have
more glass and significantly more landscaping as a commercial
rather than an industrial building. He stated the
restrictions as far as signage are covered in an agreement
with the builder and are more stringent than those in the
Scenic Highway regulations.
A letter from Steve $illa, 28765 Single Oak Drive,
representing Bedford Properties, in opposition to the zone
change, was presented to the City Clerk.
Councilmember Lindemans said the IP designation provides for
many business uses. He expressed his concern with traffic
problems generated by a full retail operation.
Mr. Markum stated the original zoning was commercial and
street widths were designed in accordance with that zoning.
He stated he felt traffic would not be adversely impacted.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked is the City Council could get
assurance that this would not be full retail. Mr. Markum said
the builder would be required to submit a traffic study as
part of the process of approving the plot plan. At this time
the Council could condition the uses.
Councilmember Muhoz said with the assurance of staff that the
Council can look at the type of usage, he is in favor of this
zone change.
Councilmember Birdsall asked if this would go through the new
Planning Commission. City Manager Aleshire explained the
reason this is before the Council is the City did not have a
Planning Commission at the time it was received by the City.
He said in the future plot plans will not come before the City
Council unless there is an appeal. Mr. Aleshire said a letter
of explanation would be forthcoming.
Mayor Parks asked how the procedure will change as a result of
having a Planning Commission. He asked if the City of
Temecula Planning Commission would act in the same manner as
the Riverside Planning Commission, having final approval
authority for plot plans.
Councilmember Mu~oz expressed his desire to continue to give
final approval to plot plans, especially for the next couple
of months.
nut.s\&\5 \90 - 6- 06/1:~/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
Councilmember Birdsall suggested directing staff to have the
City Council review all Planning Commission decisions for the
next six months.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Mu~oz to approve Zone Change No. 5446 and adopt
the negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No.
33728.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Muhoz,
Parks
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RECEHH
Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:20 PM. The meeting was reconvened
at 8:35 PM.
Mayor Parks stated Item No. 9 was scheduled for 8:00 PM and would
be heard at this time.
Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water
District Presentations
John Henniger, General Manager of Rancho California Water
District gave a presentation to the City Council. He stated
the new Santa Rosa Reclaimed Water Treatment Plant is being
built and he invited the City Council to tour this facility.
He also outlined the two basic water conversation programs
that are in place. He said Donna Powers, concentrating on
Urban water needs, is the Water Education Specialist. Mr.
Henniger stated Rancho Water has visited all four elementary
schools and both middle schools. He reported this is a very
effective educational program. He said Don Peck oversees the
agricultural water conservation program and great gains have
been made through irrigation efficiency and education of
growers.
Also available through Rancho California Water District, are
brochures on drought resistent landscaping listing over 200
varieties of plants and water saver kits (shower heads,
attachments for toilets). Mr. Henniger asked the City's help
in disseminating this information.
nutes \6\5 \90 - 7- 06/13/90
city Council Minutes June 5. 1990
Councilmember Birdsall asked if there has been a study on
putting reclaimed water to use. Mr. Henniger answered yes,
that the greatest return for this use has been through large
permanent areas, such as golf courses and parks.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if Rancho California Water District
was willing to invest funds to educate the adult population
about the drought situation. Mr. Henniger said Rancho Water
has in the past spent a considerable amount of money in
advertising and has hired a public relations firm to further
assist in the educational process.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if there is a "hot-line" for
consumers to report water waste. Mr. Henniger answered there
is a number to call and a call will be followed up by a letter
and a personal visit from a District representative.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the District has a position on
water retention and detention systems. Mr. Henniger answered
that the District has over 200 acres of recharge area as part
of a general water management plan.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if pollution from people dumping
waste materials in the sewer is a problem. Mr. Henniger
stated that at this time it is not a major problem, however as
the area continues to urbanize, it could becomes one. He
suggested regulations being imposed.
Mr. Larry LaBeau, representing Eastern Municipal Water
District, stated that Eastern is the major regional facility
for sewage and reclaimed water. Mr. LaBeau asked the City to
enter into an agreement with EMWD to cover pretreatment
services. In this way industrial users can be monitored for
improper disposal practices.
He addressed
implementing
install dual
the problem of reclaimed water and suggested
a program requiring all new developments to
piping for potable and reclaimed water systems.
Mr. LaBeau also addressed the need for treatment of sludge
through a composting project. He requested that the Council
appoint a representative to the Eastern Municipal Water
District Composting Project Monitoring Committee.
Mr. Labeau stated the best way to get information to the adult
population is through educating the children who are very open
to water conservation practices and bring this information
home to their parents.
Hi ~ut~s\6\5\90 -8- 06/1~/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
7. Appeal No. X - Plot Plan No. XX607
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 8:20 PM.
Ross Geller, Planning Director, reported this is an appeal
filed by Opto 22, of a condition of the Riverside County Road
Department to make improvements at Rancho California Road and
Front Street. Mr. Geller stated this project is adjacent to
the current City Hall and appears to be a high quality
project.
Tim Serlett, City Engineer, stated the County placed the same
condition on several plot plans and suggested alternatives for
funding these road improvements.
Howard Oxley, the project architect answered questions
regarding this project. Councilmember Mufioz asked why the
applicant would like this change, stating that someone must
make the necessary improvements. Mr. Oxley stated the company
would prefer to construct their building and would pay the
necessary fees in lieu of actual construction of the road
improvements.
Mayor Parks stated the County conditioned several plot plans
with the same conditions of doing all road improvements. He
stated it is not equitable for one developer to shoulder the
entire burden, but this should be spread between several
developers.
City Attorney Fields stated that contributing to a City Road
Benefit Fund would not necessarily be restricted to a certain
intersection, but would be a regional traffic facilities fee
which would affect the entire City. Mr. Fields outlined the
changes in conditions he would recommend. The first condition
in the staff report should be deleted and the second and third
conditions changed as follows:
At the time that a Certificate of Occupancy is issued,
the applicant is required to deposit an amount of
$10,000.00 to a newly approved City Road Benefit Fund.
The Development Impact Fee Study currently being prepared
by Willdan Associates will determine an equitable fair
share of the developer's cost of improving regional
traffic facilities based on the number of vehicles which
will be generated by the project.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the
applicant shall agree to pay a Traffic Impact Fee
according to the Development Impact Fee schedule to be
adopted by the City Council. The Agreement will provide
that the applicant will either pay additional funds or
nut es\6\5 \90 - 9- 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
receive a refund equal to the difference between the
Development Impact Fee amount and the amount of deposit.
The form of the Agreement will be subject to the approval
of the City Attorney.
Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 9:40 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by
Councilmember Birdsall to uphold the appeal, and approve Plot
Plan No. 11607 subject to the revised staff recommendations,
deleting Recommendation No. 1, adding "regional traffic
facilities" to Recommendation No. 2 and adding Recommendation
No. 3 as presented by the city Attorney.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Parks
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Appeal No. 2, Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 21769
Mayor Parks announced he would be absent from Agenda Item No.
8, due to a conflict of interest. He turned the meeting over
to'Mayor ProTem Lindemans at 8:45 PM.
Mayor ProTem Lindemans opened the public hearing at 8:46 PM.
Acting Planning Director Ross Geller, stated staff has
received an appeal from an adjacent property owner requesting
denial of this project. The developer has requested this
matter be continued at this time. Mr. Geller said a staff
report will be before the City Council on June 26, 1990 or
this item will be continued off calendar.
The public hearing was closed at 8:48 PM.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a
motion to continue this item to the meeting of June 26, 1990.
14 ~i nut es\6\5 \90 - 10- 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
10.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans turned the meeting over to Mayor Parks
at 8:47 PM.
Reauest for sponsorship - Miss California Paaeant
City Manager Aleshire stated the City has received a letter
requesting sponsorship of Miss Temecula Valley in the Miss
California Pageant. Mr. Aleshire recommended appropriating
$500 from this year's contingency fund.
Kim Foss Erickson, 41661 Enterprise Circle North, Ste 217,
stated Tracy Louvat had been crowned Miss Temecula Valley, and
is now representing the City of Temecula. Ms. Erickson stated
the Chamber of Commerce has contributed $850 toward
sponsorship and Erickson and Company has contributed $250.
She said the total cost of a pageant of this sort would run
approximately $3,000 to $5,000. Ms. Erickson requested the
City match the Chamber of Commerce donation of $850. She
stated there is no better exposure for a new City than the
television coverage Miss Temecula will have. Ms. Erickson
further stated she felt Tracy has an excellent chance to win.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor
Parks to match the Chamber of Commerce sponsorship in the
amount of $850.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Muhoz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
11. Budget considera~ion
City Manager Aleshire reported that at the previous budget
hearing, the Council asked staff to cut $1,000,000 in
appropriations from the budget. He stated this has been done.
H i nutes %6%5 %90 - 11 - 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5, 1990
John Dedovesh, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, asked the Council to
increase funds to obtain more radar equipment for the City.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Lindemans seconded a
motion to continue this item to the meeting of June 12, 1990
for final consideration.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mu5oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember
Mufioz to extend the meeting to 10:15 PM. The motion was
unanimously carried.
12. Traffic Report
City Manager Aleshire introduced Max Gillis to give the City
Council a presentation on traffic problems and solutions. Mr.
Gillis presented five categories of considerations as follows:
1. Bandaid Approach - put in stop signs, striping, etc.
2. Major construction (projects already funded).
Global overview to identify solutions which have not been
discussed such as keeping traffic away from congested
areas with off-ramps or one-way streets.
Improve workings relationships with the State, County and
Federal Government.
5. designation of one individual with knowledge and
experience to look at the total plan.
Mr. Gillis explained it is not possible to put in stop signs
"tomorrow". He stated traffic solutions must be consistent or
they create a danger to the public for which the City would be
held liable. He said projects can be expedited by not sending
out one traffic engineer at a time, but 10 to establish
nut es\6\5 \90 - 1 ~ - 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5. 1990
necessary criteria. He said a priority list should be
established.
Mr. Gillis further advised that in working with State, County
and Federal Governments, a single voice, single face who
understands the entire issue should represent the City, not
several diverse groups.
City Manager Aleshire asked Tim Serlett to present several
projects currently in process. They are as follows:
Rancho California Overpass Crossings - meeting with
Bedford Properties to discuss alternatives to removal of
medians. The County will no longer be involved in this
project, it will be handled by the City.
Highway 79 and Pala Road - meeting on June 12, 1990 with
Riverside County Road Commissioner, Ivan Tennant, a
representative from J. F. Davidson, Riverside County
Flood Control, and Fish and Wildlife, to determine the
status of this project. The design has been completed
but not reviewed by the County.
Club Valencia - Have met with developers and the flood
control issue has been resolved. Traffic counts have
been taken and the final map will be on the agenda on
June 26, 1990.
Calle Medusa meeting with property owners was held on
June 6, 1990 - a stop sign will be installed, cross walks
and a 25 mph zone.
Winchester Road and Nicholas Road - Will have a meeting
with Chuck Collins from Ranpac to discuss an interim
design for the intersection. The assessment district
will fund improvement.
e
Woodcreek Apartments - staff has looked at a striping
plan or restricting left turns. There is currently not
enough room to create a left turn pocket.
Moraga Road in front of Temecula Middle School - The
school district does not plan to make improvements. Mr.
Serlett stated a conceptual design, cost and a time frame
will be coming before the Council in two or three weeks.
Councilmember Lindemans asked that the Senior Citizens Center
on Highway 79 be looked into as well as the Roripaugh entrance
into Highway 79.
# ~ o~es\6\5\90 - 13- 06/13/90
City Council Minutes June 5, 1990
Mr. Serlett said he is working with Captain Sayre and the
Highway Patrol to obtain accident reports to determine the
locations and causes of accidents in the City.
Councilmember Muhoz asked that a left turn lane on Rancho
California Road turning into the center just west of Moraga,
be looked into.
City Manager Aleshire stated there are a series of issues
being reviewed and a detailed report is forthcoming.
13. Sign Ordinance
City Manager Aleshire stated a meeting has been held with the
Temecula Commerce committee and the City has agreed to give
balloon owners one more week to present recommendations for
amending the sign ordinance to permit advertising balloons.
Mr. Aleshire also reported a meeting is scheduled with Target
Store owners to discuss improving the medians and left turn
lanes into that center.
14. Mello Boos - Ynez Corridor
The County has turned the engineering work over to the City.
Willdan is putting together a report recommending action to be
taken within the next two to three months.
15. Landscape Maintenance
City Manager Aleshire stated he will report next week on this
matter.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
16. Ouimbv Ordinance
City Attorney Fields stated this is being finalized now and
will be on the agenda on the June 19, 1990 or June 26, 1990.
This ordinance will deal with land dedication and impact fees
for improvements of parks.
17. Curfew Ordinance
City Attorney Fields said a draft loitering ordinance was
prepared and delivered to Police Chief Sayre. Captain Sayre
feels it is not necessary to have a loitering ordinance since
codes are already in place. Captain Sayre reported success
through this method. A report on an ordinance to establish a
curfew will be before the Council on June 19, 1990.
14 i nut es \6\5 \90 - 14- 06/1~/90
city Council Minutes June 5. 1990
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded
a motion to extend the meeting until 10:45 PM. The motion was
unanimously carried.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Mu~oz asked to be designated as the Council Delegate
to the Riverside Transit Authority. Mayor Parks asked that this
matter be placed on the next agenda for action.
Mayor Parks requested that the matter of requesting Mr. Max Gillis
to work with the City on traffic matters be placed on a future
agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember
Moore to adjourn at 10:51 PM to a meeting on June 12, 1990, 7:00
PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
RONALD J. PARKS, MAYOR
F. D. ALESHIRE, CITY CLERK
nut es \6\5 \90 - 15 - 06/13/90
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
MTG:
DEPT
Z TITLE: TENTATIVE TRACT "O. 23209 DEPT
~-~-eo CITY
: e."~. CITY MGR
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council SET FOR HEARING Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amendment
No. 4 on July 24, 1990.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Request Filed:
Case No.:
Representative:
Proposal:
Location:
Zoning:
Surrounding
Zoning:
Surrounding
Land Uses:
Project
Statistics:
County Planning, April 6, 1990
Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amendment No. 4
Alba Engineering, Inc.
To subdivide an 80 acre site into 257 single family residential
lots with a minimum area of 8,000 square feet per lot.
West of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane,
approximately 1.25 miles north of Rancho California Road.
RT
North: RA-5 and RA-2 1/2
South: S-P
East: A-1-10 and R-R
West: R T
North: Scattered single family residential
South: Vacant
East: Vineyards
West: Single family residential existing
construction.
and under
Tentative Tract Map for 257 lots on 80 acres. The minimum
proposed lot size is 8,000 square feet.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amendment No. ~ was tentatively approved by the
Riverside County Planning Commission on February 7, 1990. The case was
transferred to the City of Temecula with a RECEIVE and FILE recommendation.
AREA SETTING
The site which is currently vacant is located in hilly terrain primarily
characterized by steep slopes. The site is traversed by several westerly
trending washes. A biological field survey has identified Stepben's Kangaroo Rat
habitat on the site. There are scattered single family residences on large lots
north of the site. The land east of the site is a vineyard. There are single family
residences west of the site, both existing and under construction. The currently
vacant land south of the site is part of the Margarita Village Specific Plan.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO 23209
STAFF CONCERNS
Staff recommends that the project be set for public hearing because of concerns
which include the following issues:
The intensity of the proposed grading over two million cubic yards of cut
and fill on 80 acres is severe. Staff requests policy direction on earth
movement of this intensity.
e
A traffic study was not conducted for this project. There is no information
available regarding traffic impacts and projected levels of service of
streets in the vicinity.
There is a possible land use intensity conflict with the future General Plan
regarding appropriate development in this hilly area adjacent to the
citrus/vineyard agricultural area. Appropriate buffer densities are in
question.
The apparent presence of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat raises questions not
yet addressed by the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council SET FOR HEARING Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amendment
No. qon July 2q, 1990.
.%
li
. / =/! I ',N..,,> .~:-~. "'i "(
I,/SCAll'I~REDIJ 'v''--, r~
'~ ~11 RESIDENTIAL ~, ; \
..4..~!!'m-! · !',-..:--_ ~,'.,,RE~IOENTI,AL_ '
--~ -,L~_q. jum~ ,,~..-'_____ -
..," -. I__ .~,----~l~ 11
,' !t~."" "!' \ II ----
!
AND / 't:-~ i"'
~//GRADED , HILLY
'...$~
" "~ ~-'~' ~ HILLY
.%1 '
-.~~ ..~..'
VAC ~ ' ~:~i\\ ..x" ~ X,~ '--
~ uo.~ ,, ::-' .' .~ NEYARDS
'xx HOI~E " . :~.. ~"~ ,," ,~:-=---- _
.... ~. ?;.;~, \~ ~
\V--~AI:IK .'
~ // GRADED ~.:'v-~~"' :~:'"~-'~;'
.
~. ~X/ . . ~/~ ~ --
RE~/ "- ~ / u GRADED
~. ALBA '~SULT~NG
~ ~ AC. IN~ ~57 LOTS ~ ey.
, ~ ~ ~ SKINNER LAKE ~~. lit
: . ~.~9T. 7~2W. ~'1 ~ 914 ~. ~1
~~ LA ~~ WY --SECONDARY-- 88'
~t ~ERFIE~ STA~ ~. ~~L-- I10'
1'- ~' R~ ~~ P~NING ~~NT
W Y
A~. ALBA ~$ULT1NG
u.. ao AC. m?o zs7 LOTS
~ SKINNER LAKE
~ L4 ~EREN4
EIment BUTTERFIELD-.---- £CONDARY-..
_. o ~(~E
'"""" ' '"I-q~/W,VG
LOO4TION4L M4,t
lINEN4
..~E XI BIT D
SK~ ~
· DISTRIBUTION OF STEPHENS' KAN6ARO0 RAT (SKR)
ON TEKrATIVE TRACT #0. 23?.09
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: $
HTG: (,-
DEPT: ~~.~
TITLE:
PARCEL MAP NO. 211,169
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY HGR
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council RECEIVE and FILE Parcel Map No. 24169, subject to the
conditions of approval.
DISCUSSION
The parcel map is located south of Margarita Road north of Rancho California
Road, east of Lindy Way and west of Moraga Road. The project is to divide 4.4
acres into two parcels. The applicant is Kindercare Learning Center, Inc.,
represented by the J.M. Burnsfine Company.
This project was submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on
October 28, 1988, and was approved by the Board of Supervisors on September
19, 1989.
The following fees have been paid for this project:
Fee Amount
Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
Flood Mitigation
13,625.00
4,748.25
4,287.00
No bonds were required by the County of Riverside for this project as bonds for
Plot Plan No. 10694 have been posted for the improvements shared with this
project. A security deposit of $17,802.00 has been paid for street improvements
by Parcel Map 21469. This project will have only one access to Rancho California
Road as shown on the parcel map. The access for the proposed day care center
will be from Lyndie Lane.
FISCAL IMPACT
Not determined
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE and FILE Final Tract Map
24169, subject to the conditions of approval.
OFFICE OF THE ROAD CO~qlSSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Ivan F. Tennant'Acting
Road Commissioner
County Administrative Center
~lailing Address: PO Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
Telephone (714) 787-6554
~ay 16, 1990
SUBMITTAL TO FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY !~iAGER OF THE CITY OF TF~tEC~
FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula
SUBJECT: Parcel Map 24169
in the First Supervisorial District
SPECIFIC REQUEST:
Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it
is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map.
All required certificates and documents have been filed and
the map is ~eady for recordation.
IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb
Ivan F. Tennant
Acting City Engineer
City of Temecula
Parcel Map 24169
2 May 18, 1990
Attached is Tax Bond No. 3SM 75741700 in the amount of
$30,200 issued by American Motorists Insurance Company.
This' map complies in all respects with the provisions of
Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local
ordinances.
The dedications made on the above referenced map are for:
Lots "A" through D" inclusive and the abutters rights of
access along Rancho California Road are dedicated for public
road and public utility purposes and as part of the City
Maintained Road System.
~ '~ APTS
GRADED APTS.
0
· cu zeBo
PP 10494 ~ ~
COMM.
U/C.
VAC
APTS
o VAC
VAC
VAC
COMM.
VAC
VAC j~ L
o APTS
KINDER- CARE LEARNING CENTER, INC.
4.4Ac. INTO TWO PARCELS
Area TEMECULA Sup.Dist. lST
Sec. :55 T.7S.R.$W. A~,ussor's Bk. 921 Pg.:51 (10)
Circulation ~ FREEWAY VARIABLE
'Element RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.--ARTERIAL-IIO'
I:~ Bk. 1~l.55-CDate 04/26/89 Drawn ByRG./I~./
' 40~' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NO $CAL!
RES.
LOCATtONAL MAP f
i PM 24169
R-2'-3,000 -2-20.--.-
/EXISTING ZONING
- ~ f.=.ij ,m,L. '-
R-3-3,000
} 3
R-3-4,000
C-1/C-P
i:.~' 4.3 9 Ac. z
R-3
C-1/C-P
.i
R-2
~ R-3
R-3
. -SP 180 R-R
App. KINDER- CARE LEARNING CENTER, INC.
Use 4.4Ac. INTO TWO PARCELS
Area TEMECULA . Sup. Dist. lST
Sec. :55 T. 7S.R.$W. Ae~sessor, Bk. 92' Pg.$l(10)
Circulation ~ FREEWAY VARIABLE
Fid. Bk. 1~.55 CDate 04/2:6/89 Drawn ByRG./ /
I
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: '/
MTG: (o- ~a .qo
DEPT:
TITLE: PLOT PLAN NO. 11338
AMENDED NO. 2, PLANNING CORRECTION NO. I
DEPT HD /~
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
R ECOMMEN DAT ION
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE and FILE Plot Plan No. 11338,
Amended No. 2, Planning Correction No. 1, based on the findings and subject to
the conditions of approval contained in the attached County Staff Report.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Owner:
Applicant:
Proposal:
Location:
Zoning:
Surrounding
Zoning:
Surrounding
Land Uses:
Environmental
Concerns:
James L. and Mary Ann Ramsay
Mexican Patio Cafe, Inc.
To construct a 4,060 square foot restaurant with drive
through lane service.
The northwesterly side of Jefferson Avenue approximately
1,200 feet southeast of Winchester Road.
C-P-S, Scenic Highway Commercial
North: C-P-S
South: C-P-S
East: I - 15
West: C-1/CP, General Commercial
North:
South:
East:
West:
Service Station and Motel
Single Story Office Building
1-15
Shopping Center
2.
3.
Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat
Liquefaction Potential
Alquist-Priolo Zone
Inundation Potential
BACKGROUND
Date of original submittal to County of Riverside: June 28, 1989.
Date of tentative approval by Riverside County Planning Director:
1990.
Date received by the City of Temecula: May 2, 1990.
February 5,
DISCUSSION AND ADDED CONDITION
The legend on the plot plan indicates that the total combined area of the interior
dining rooms and the patio is 1,755 square feet. The parking requirement is
calculated on the basis of the stated square footacje. The number of parking
spaces provided is adequate to satisfy the parking requirement with no extra
spaces provided.
PLOT PLAN NO. 11338
AMENDED NO. 2, PLANNING CORRECTION NO. 1
City Planning Staff found that the combined interior dining and patio area is
substantially greater than 1,755 square feet and would require a significant
number of parking spaces in addition to those provided. Staff is recommending
approval of the project based on the attached letter of intent from the applicant
to limit the combined interior dining and patio area to 1,755 square feet. The
following condition shall be added to the project:
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit working
drawings demonstrating that adequate parking is provided based on a combined
total interior dining/patio area of 1,755 square feet. The environmental concerns
are adequately addressed in the conditions of approval of the attached County
Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACT
The processing of the application was completed by the County. No development
application fees are available to reimburse the City.
FEES TO BE COLLECTED
2.
3.
q.
County Ordinance No. 663 - Stephens Kangaroo Rat fee.
Riverside County Fire Department plan check fee of $t~13.00 and fire impact
mitigation fee of $0.25 per square foot.
Riverside County Road Department traffic signal mitigation fee of
$3,8OO.OO.
Riverside county Flood Control and Water Conservation District flood
mitigation fee of $1,118.00.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE and FILE Plot Plan No. 11338
subject to the revised conditions of approval and based on the analysis contained
in the staff reports.
ESBENSEN G, ASSOCIATES
architects &. general contractors
~emcu~a, CA 92390
latention: 8coat V~ight
~ Pl~Og !~:XICMI CA!~g
In accordance with toBay's telephone conversation with Scott Wright, we
o! sub{eel pro~ect to 450 square feet In order to met the limit pt
1755 squo~e ~eet o! total dining a:ee and X4L total seats V~tch are
ouppo:ted by the 47 peeking s~ces UEovided on site,
This resflitted amount o[ Ixte:lor plaid seating viii be achieve~ by
expanding the landscaping within the a:sa isclose~ by the 4' mtucco
~x~ an~ ~¥ designating circulation areas. h are DEeriding herewith
two zecoz~ pzin of modified sheets X and 2 Ihovlng these revisions.
T~ank you Eor cooperation in getting this 9reject ~o ~he Council.
If you ~ave a~ questions, please ca~l. Us will resDon~ imdlately.
{Imcorely,
#. BA.O(3
Maptiered A~chitect
inc. (2)
8150 Yarrow Drive, Suite H Carlsbad, CA 92009 ($1g) 41'd ~4~5
PL Oq" PLAN 11%38
75 NOTTINGHILL RD
76 BRAEWOOD CT
79 CALI. E ESPANA
80 BUFFY WY
' 81 CORTE FLAMENCO ~ ... /,
82 ATHENA LN
83 MIMOSA DR j~' ~ 3~ ~'.
,o,/ _.,'
.~t~' 'S~ .
. Countk
.... ~Admin. Ctr.
'uare
SOL \
AUTO
CE
'f~cul~
Bon~ F~tro/
Ama HO.
v/c /h,I/TY mAP
Ill
I~1
I-
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
HTG:
DEPT:
TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. ~0 0EPT
/~w~q t~ ~ ~fie~!am tee C~[T¥ A1~¥
J~J~11e M,,'a eM'~n,~.'[m a~ e~,abllidnl Qeetatn
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 90, adopting the "Standard
Specifications For PublicWorks Construction" and specifying permit requirements
for construction within public righ~ts-of-wa¥.
DISCUSSION
The City wail permit, approve, and maintain items constructed within public
rlgh.ts-of-way. The subject rea~lutlon addresses two Issues: uniformity of good
quality construction methods and materials, and city liability during and after
construction of those Improvements.
The "Standard Specifications For Public Works Construction" (also known as the
Greenbook), is widely used by public agencies throughout the st. ate. The
specifications In the Greenbook, In c~nJunctlon with the previously adopted
standard drawings and proper Inspection, provide that Improvements constructed
within the public rights-el-way will be constructed in a uniform manner with
proper materials.
improvements permitted by the City should be performed only by licensed
contractors with proper insurance coverage. The improYementa should also be
covered by security in the form of a cash deposit or bond to Insure that the work
will be completed in a proper manner.
The Greenbook requires contractors to carry liability Insurance covering the
City. The current edition requires the following amounts:
Bodily Injury
$250,000 each person
$500,000 each occurrence
$500,000 aggr~cjate product and completed operations
Property Damage $100,000 each occurrence
$250,000 aggregate
;x', alternatively
A combined single limit policy with an aggregate limit In the a~nount of
$1,0o0,0o0.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION
WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND ESTABLISHING
CERTAIN PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to insure that standard and acceptable
methods and materials are utilized for constructing improvements within public rights-of-way
with uniform, safe and effective work area traffic controls; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to insure that the construction of such
improvements is properly prosecuted with minimum liability to the City.
follows:
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve as
Section 1. The Standard specifications for the City of Temecula shall be the
latest edition, latest supplement of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction", published by Building News, Incorporated.
Section 2. Work area traffic control standards for the City of Temecula shall be
the latest edition, latest supplement of the "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook",
published by Building News, Incorporated.
Section 3. A permit issued by the City Engineer is required for all construction
within the public rights-of-way. Such construction shall be performed only by a
contractor properly licensed by the State of California.
Section 4. Proof of liability insurance as specified in the "Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction" shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of any permit.
Section $. Surety for the proposed work shall be submitted to the City Engineer
prior to the issuance of any permit.
4/Reso/62
Section 6. Administration of the issuance of permits and interpretation of the
several specifications and standards adopted herein, shall be by the City Engineer or
authorized representative.
Section 7. The Mayor shall sign this resolution and the City Clerk shall attest
and certify to the passage and adoption thereof.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 1990.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk
[SEAL]
4/Re~o/62
Mayor
qon Parks
Mayor Pro Tern
Karel F. Lindemans
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, Califomia 92390
(714) 694-1989
FAX (714) 694-1999
Councilmembers
Patricia H. Birdsall
Peg Moore
J. Sal MuBoz
June 13, 1990
Mr. David F. Dixon
11140 Pioneer Ridge Drive
Moreno Valley, California 92388
AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER OF TEMECULA
On behalf of the City Council, it is my pleasure to officially offer you the
position of City Manager for the City of Temecula.
It is my understanding that you are already familiar with the duties and
responsibilities of the City Manager, and that you will perform all of the duties
necessary to manage the City and to perform such other duties as the Council
may assign from time to time. The purpose of this letter is to set forth the
additional terms and conditions of employment for your position.
1. Appointment - If you decide to accept this position, your
appointment would become effective July 5, 1990. Your appointment will
terminate on July 5, 1995; however, the City and you anticipate that this
Agreement may be extended from time to time with the consent of the City and
you, and according to such terms as the City and you may agree on.
2. Salary - Your base salary will be set at $103,870.00 per year for
the remainder of the fiscal year 1989-1990, and all of the fiscal year 1990-1991.
Your annual base salary will be payable in installments at the same time as the
other employees of the City. Commencing on July 5, 1990, the City will
contribute to a deferred compensation program of your choice, a sum equal to
seven and 22/100 percent (7.229[) of your base monthly salary.
3. Retirement - The City of Temecula will execute all necessary
agreements to participate in the State of California Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) and you will be enrolled in that program at the earliest eligible
date. The employee's contribution to PERS would be paid on your behalf by the
City of Temecula.
AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER
June 13, 1990
Page No. 2
4. Vacation Leave and Sick Leave - Effective on your first day of
employment with the City, you will be credited with fourteen (14) days of
combined vacation and sick leave. Thereafter, you will accrue combined paid
vacation and sick leave at the rate of 2.334 days per month during the term of
your employment. You will also be eligible to receive any unused vacation leave
and sick leave in cash when leaving the employment of the City. All aspects of
the administration of sick leave and vacation leave will be in accordance with that
which is provided to all executive management employees of the City.
5. Administrative Leave - The City will provide you with ten (10)
days of administrative leave per fiscal year accumulating at a rate of 0.834/day
per month. Any unused leave may be paid out to you in cash semi-annually at
your option.
6. Medical Benefits - The City will enroll you and all of your eligible
dependents in the major medical, health, sickness, accident, and disability income
programs the City provides or makes available to all executive management
employees of the City. In the event that no such plan exists, the City will
provide a similar plan for you, substantially equal to that which is provided to
employees of similar cities in the area.
7. Life Tn~rance - The City will provide you with term life
insurance from a carrier of the City's choice in accordance with that which is
provided to all executive management employees of the City. In the event that
no such plan exists, the City will provide a similar plan for you substantially
equal to that which is provided to employees of similar cities in the area.
8. Physical Examination - You will submit to a complete physical
examination by a qualified physician selected by the City once a year. The City
will pay for the cost of this physical examination and the City will receive a copy
of all medical reports related to such examination.
AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER
June 13, 1990
Page No. 3
9. Professional Development - All normal business expenses,
including attendance at League of California Cities, Independent Cities
Association, California Redevelopment Association, and International City
Managers Association meetings and conferences, as well as local service club
membership, business lunches and dinners, etcetera, will be paid for by the City
and provided for separately in the operating budget of the City Manager's Office.
All other job-related seminars, training sessions, and professional dues and
subscriptions will be paid for by the City and provided for separately in the
operating budget of the City Manager's office.
10. Vehicle - The City will provide you with a City vehicle for your
professional and personal use, not including vacations. The City will pay for all
insurance, gasoline, maintenance, and registration for this vehicle. In addition,
the City will provide for regular replacement of the vehicle consistent with the
depreciation policies of the City.
11. Residency - The City and you have acknowledged the desirability
of your relocation to the City of Temecula. In order to secure your relocation,
the City will provide you with:
(A) Low Interest Loan. The City will make available to you
a housing loan. The loan, a first mortgage, will be up to 70% of the purchase
price of a home within the City. The interest payments will be paid to the City
on a monthly basis at a rate equivalent to the interest earned by the City
investment portfolio or some other mutually agreed upon index. The rate will be
an adjustable rate, calculated on an annual basis. There will be a cap rate of
three percentage points on the loan which means that the rate will not increase by
more than three percentage points during the life of the loan. The loan will be
due and payable within twelve (12) months of your leaving your employment with
the City or when the home is no longer your primary residence, whichever occurs
first. You will obtain, and keep current, a life insurance policy in the amount of
the loan and the City will be named as the primary beneficiary in order to pay off
the loan in the event of your death. You will be responsible for the cost of this
policy and you will file a copy of the policy with the City.
AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER
June 13, 1990
Page No. 4
(B) Moving Expenses. The City will pay your expenses, in an
amount not to exceed $4,000, for packing, moving and transporting, storing,
unpacking, and insurance of your personal belongings and those of your family.
12. Performance Evaluation - The Council will review and evaluate
your performance at least once annually in advance of the adoption of the City's
budget. This review and evaluation will be in accordance with specific criteria,
goals, and performance objectives developed jointly by you and the Council.
13. Outside Activities - You will not engage in any outside activities
for compensation without prior approval of the Council.
14. Termination of Appointment; Severance - The City and you will
have the right to terminate this Agreement prior to July 1, 1995 or any extensions
of this Agreement, except that the City will not terminate this Agreement during
the first ninety (90) days following a regular or special municipal election in
which members of the Council are elected. The City may terminate this
Agreement for any reason; however, should you be involuntarily terminated by
the City for any reason other than conviction of an illegal act involving moral
turpitude or personal gain to you, you would be provided with a lump sum cash
payment equal to six (6) months' aggregate salary. Medical benefits and life
insurance will be extended six (6) months after termination, or when replaced by
another employer, whichever first occurs. You may terminate this Agreement for
any reason, provided you first furnish the City with at least thirty (30) days'
advance notice.
15. Indemnification and Bond - The City will defend, save harmless,
and indemnify you against any tort, professional liability claim or demand, or
other legal action, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act
or omission occurring in the performance of your duties as City Manager. This
provision will not apply with respect to any intentional tort or crime which you
may commit or to any punitive damages which may be assessed against you. The
City will bear the full cost of a fidelity bond in the amount of $100,000.00 or any
other bonds which may be required of you in the performance of your duties as
City Manager.
AGREEMENT/APPOINTMENT AS CITY MANAGER
June 13, 1990
Page No. 5
16. Miscellaneous - Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement,
you will receive all benefits to which executive management employees of the
City are entitled. In addition, the City will not, at any time during the term of
this Agreement, reduce your salary, compensation, or other financial benefits,
except to the degree the City reduces such benefits, or any portion of such
benefits, for all employees of the City.
This offer of employment is made with the approval and authorization of the
Temecula City Council.
Sincerely,
Ronald Parks
Mayor
ACCEPTED:
Dated: , 1990
David F. Dixon
RP:sjf
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#: *r
MTG:
DEPT:
TITLE:
PLOT PLAN NO. 1123~
AMENDED NO. 2
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR -~'~---~
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council open the public hearing, receive public testimony and
continue the item off calendar until the staff and the developer have had a chance
to review the potential traffic impacts of the project,
BACKGROUND
Case No.:
Applicant:
Representative:
Proposal:
Location:
Zoning:
Environmental
Action:
Plot Pan No. 11234, Amended No. 2
Bedford Properties
Mary Jane Jagodzinski
Construct a 67,553 square foot office building and a two story
parking structure (total 231 spaces needed ) on a five ( 5 ) acre
site.
Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road.
C-1/C-P General Commercial
Negative Declaration
ANALYSIS
STATUS SUMMARY
This project was processed by the County of Riverside and initially approved at
a Planning Director's hearing on February 26, 1990. Pursuant to the provisions
of City Ordinance No. 13-89, the item was forwarded to the Temecula City Council
for final action. On April 17, 1990, the Council pulled this project from the
consent agenda and set the matter for public hearing. The proposal has been
duly advertised and posted as required by the City ordinances, and adjacent
property owners have been notified of the hearing. The project was continued
at the May 22, 1990 meeting to the June 19, 1990 meeting, but the application is
not yet ready to be considered.
PROPOSAL PARAMETERS
The project proposes construction of a 67,553 square foot multi-story office
building and parking structure on a 5.17 acre site. The architecture and land
use intensity parallel the office building and parking structure currently under
construction by Bedford Properties on the site. All the structures are situated
around a lake system designed as an entry statement and focal point for Specific
Plan No. 149.
The project is immediately adjacent to Highway 15. Access is limited to Ynez
Road, or from the north through Von's parking lot.
PLOT PLAN NO. 1123~1
AMENDED NO. 2
PAGE 2
INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT
The multi-story building planned for the site, in conjunction with the building
under construction, will constitute an intensity of development more common to
urbanized commercial areas. From an aesthetic standpoint, the lakes and
generous landscaping will mitigate concerns of visual impact. Additionally, the
office buildings have deliberate designs which form an effective transition from
the lower scale commercial development ( Von's Center) to this office development.
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Staff has been waiting for the developer to provide the City with the approved
traffic study which assessed the potential impacts of the proposed project. Staff
was recently informed that no traffic study was prepared for the project. The
County Road Department felt that they had ample traffic data on file for the area,
to justify not requiring a specific study for this project. Staff feels the intensity
of the proposed project could further impact an already impacted intersection.
This impact coupled with the recent improvements proposed by Bedford
Properties along Rancho California Road, concern staff. Staff feels that
additional review time is appropriate and is warranted to fully assess the potential
impacts of the proposal.
SUMMARY
In conclusion, staff recommends that the City Council Continue item off calendar
until the staff and the developer have had a chance to assess the potential traffic
impacts of the project.
Notice of Public Hearint,
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92390
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the
matter(s) described below.
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Plot Plan No. 11234
Bedford Properties
Northwest Corner of Rancho California and Ynez Roads.
Construction of a 68,000 square Foot Office Building and multi-
level parking structure on a five acre site.
Environmental
Action: Negative Declaration
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing(s) or may
appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of
hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The
proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula City
Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM.
Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Samuel Reed, City of Temecula
Planning Department, (714) 694-1989.
The time, place and date of the hearing(s) are as follows:
PLACE OF HEARING:
DATE OF HEARING:
TIME OF HEARING:
Temecula Community Center
28816 Pujol Street
Temecula
Tuesday. May 22, 1990
7:00 PM
PROJECT
'~.. ~OCAT ION
VICINITY MAP
,- !
i
I'O R ! V 1! R.";IDI.i
PROJECT
LOCATION
R,,\ X¢'i I{} (' ,,\1.11
T() SAN
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
HTG: 6/Z9/90
DEPT:ozs
TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND:
FISCAL IMPACT:
&TTACHMENT:
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
DEPT J
CITY
CITY MGR :::~..._~
Approve the County of Riverside to provide
Animal Control Services to the City of
Temecula for the Fiscal Year 1991 for an
amount not to exceed $80,000.
At the attachment is the County's proposal
to provide Animal Control Services to the
City of Temecula for the next Fiscal Year.
The County's proposal has been reviewed by
staff and is considered the desired
alternative. The services that the County
would provide are consistent with services
that could be provided by a private agency
at approximately the same cost. As
detailed in the attachment, the County
would provide:
- Field Services and Staffing
- Emergency Services and Staffing
- Local Animal Control Presence
Shelter Services Within a Reasonable
Distance (Lake Elsinore)
- Local Animal Licensing Services
Animal Care Education and Information
Programs
Low Cost Spay/Neuter and Rabies
Vaccination Programs
- Veterinary Services
- Ordinance Enforcement
- All Forms, Citations, Tags, etc.
Monies are available in Fiscal Year 1991's
budget for Animal Control Services in the
amount of $80,000.
County of Riverside, Department of Health,
letter and proposal of June 7, 1990, with
enclosure.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
/DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
4065 COUNTY CIRCLE DR. RIVERSIDE. CA. 92503 (Mxilinq Addteaa - P.O. Box 7600
FAC$ ,~e (714) 358-4529
June 7, 1990
92515-7600)
Mr. Joe Hreha
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Mr. Hreha:
Enclosed are answers to questions in the City of Temecula's request for
proposal for animal control services. If you have additional questions or
disagree with the information provided, please contact Emmett Gibson, Chief
Animal Control Officer at (714) 358-5083.
In order for us to continue to provide animal control services to the
City of Temecula, we will need a letter from the City Manager stating the
city's willingness to pay for the services provided at the prices set forth
in the enclosed document.
If you have further questions or if we can be of assistance in any way,
please call Mr. Gibson.
Sincerely,
er ert C. Holk, M.P.H.
Deputy Director of Health
for Special Services
HCH:sr
CINDRA ROWELL, B.S.N.. M.B.A.J.M. FANNING. R.S., M.P.A. H.C. HOCK. D.V.M., M.P.H. E.R. COYNE. M.S.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HEALTH DEPUTY DI~[CTO~ OF ~ALTH [.d. GALLAGHER. M.D~ M.P.~ M.A. ~TY D~ECT~ ~ ~ALTH DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ~EALTH
~RS~AL ~ALTM SERV~[S ~NV~MENTAL ~ALTH SERV~[S DIRECTOR 0r HEALTH S~ClAL SERV~[S ' A~. & SUPP~T 5[RV~ES
~ALTH CENT[RS
~ ~O~S ~AMS[Y STREET - ~ CA 92220 ~ BLYTH[ ~6~ NORTH BROADWAY - Blythe, CA 92225 ~ GAS& ~LANCA 7~40 MARGU[RITA - R~VlrlJde, CA 92504 ~
GORONA ~0~ SOUTH BUENA VISTA - Cararia, CA 917gO ~ ~[M[T ~80 NORTH STATE STREET - Hamer. CA 92343 ~ INOlO ~6-209 OASIS STREET - lal~e. CA 92201
LAKE ELSINORE ~0195 FRASER DR. - Lake Elenaere, CA 92~0 ~ PALM SPRINGS 3255 TAHQUITZ- MgCALLUM - Palm S~r~ale. CA 92262 ~ P[RRIS 2~7 NORTH "D" ST. -
Petrie. CA 92370 ~ RIVERSIDE 1520 LINDEN ST. - R,verl,~e, CA 9250? ~ RU~IDOUX 58~ MISSION BLVD. - R~ere,ee. CA 92509
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
RIVERSIDE, CA. 925034065 (MAilinq AddreAa - P.O. Box 760092515-7600)
COUNTY CIRCLE DR.
F&CS ae (714) 358-4529
June 7, lg90
Mr. Joe Hreha
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Mr. Hreha:
Per your telephone request on June 1, 1990, the following are the services
that the County of Riverside Department of Health, Division of Animal Control
Services have available to the City of Temecula.
I. Field Services/Staffing
A. Regular Hours
$32.00 per hour and 42C per mile.
1. Recommend one (1) full time Animal Control Officer for your
city to begin with and to be reviewed after six months.
2. The hourly rate and per mile fee would apply only when the
Animal Control Officer is performing city functions.
3. Public requests and radio dispatching of the Animal Control
Officer would be included.
Be
After Hours, Holidays & Emergency Services/Staffing
$39.00 per hour and 42C per mile.
1. Requests for services during these time periods are screened
to avoid any unnecessary costs, i.e., a dead animal is not
considered an emergency.
2. These services would be provided by the On Call Animal Control
Officer for the unincorporated area and the city would not
be charged for the extra "on call" costs, but would be charged
for services performed for the city.
3. The Riverside Sheriff's Department would receive calls, relay
to the Animal Control Officer and provide radio dispatch
services during these time periods.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HEALTH
P~RSONAL 14~ALTM SERVICES
C. Animal Control Officer
Space has been provided for Animal Control in the Temecula Health
Center, at Yenez Road, and Winchester. The Animal Control
personnel will make arrangements to sell dog licenses from the
office at a specified time period, i.e., 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM or at
a time that could be mutually agreed upon. Since the Animal Control
Officer would handle the license transaction, a limited time must
be established in order to avoid reducing field time.
DEPUTY D~ECT~ ~ ~ALTN I.d. GALLAGHER, M.Ow M.P.H. M,A. DEITY ~[CT~ ~ ~ALTH DEPUTY OIR[CTOR 0F HEALTH
ENV~MENTAL ~ALTH SERV~ES DIRECTO~ 0F HEALTH S~C~L SERV~[S ' A~. &
HEALTH CENTERS
CORONA 505 SOUTM BUENA VISTA - Cereal, CA 9f7~0 ~ HEMET 880 NORT~ STATE STR(ET- Heeet, CA 92543 ~ tNOlO 46-20~ 0ASIS STREET -
Plrr~l, CA 9Z370 ~ ~IVERSID[ ESZO LINDEN ST. - R,vlrl,al, C& 92~07 ~ RU~IDOUX 5888 MISSION BLV0. - R~vers~ae. CA 92509
The County telephone system will allow "call forwarding" when
personnel are not in the Temecula Health Center, telephone number-
694-5105.
II.
Shelter Services
A. Shelter services for animals impounded from the City of Temecula
are provided by the Lake Elsinore Animal Friends, a California
nonprofit corporation, located at:
29001Bastron Ave. Mailing Address
Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 P.O. Box 1143
(714) 674-0618 Lake Elsinore, CA 92331
Lake Elsinore Animal Friends charges the following fees to the County
and the County in turn will charge Temecula:
1. $15.00 per live weaned animal delivered to the shelter.
2. Additional fees are charged for animals housed in excess of ten
(10) days, i.e., evidenciary animals pending court action.
a. Farm type animals, $3.50 per day
b. Birds/Fowl, $1.00 per day
c. Dogs/cats, $2.00 per day
3. The sum of $100.00 per month as reimbursement for the rental expense
for euthanasia freezers.
a. The City of Temecula will be charged a sum of $25.00 per month
to offset a portion of this service.
B. Lake Elsinore Animal Friends shall retain all impound fees, adoption
fees and charges collected from animal owners and others.
A copy of the agreement between the County of Riverside and Lake
Elsinore Animal Friends will be provided to the City of Temecula
upon request.
III.
Animal Licensing Services
A. Dog licenses
1. County will provide tags, licensing forms, renewal notices
by mail, second mailing notice if necessary, maintain license
data on the computerized system, sell the license and other
related aspects necessary. The City will be charged $5.85
for each license sold; the remainder of the license fee will
be credited to the City and used to offset part of the costs
of the Animal Control Services Contract. The current dog
license fees are:
Altered dog
Unaltered dog
Altered dog (owned
by Senior Citizen,
60 yrs. or older)
1 yr. 2 yr. 3 yr. Late Fee
8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00
16.00 24.00 32.00 20.00
3.00 5.00 7.00 15.00
B. Kennel/Cattery licensing would be handled in the hourly rate
covered under Field Service/Staffing.
IV.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
Animal Care Education & Information Program
A. The County will provide lectures and give presentations to schools
and community groups when requested to do so.
B. Pamphlets/flyers relating to animal care and animal education will
provided by the County at no additional charge.
Low Cost Spay/Neuter & Rabies Vaccination Program
The County has a low cost spay/neuter program which was mandated by
public vote. The services are presently provided by various licensed
veterinarians.
Negotiations will be started immediately with the veterinarians in
and/or near the City of Temecula to further enhance this service to
the public in the Temecula area.
Door to door canvassing to verify rabies vaccination and applicable
licensing will be performed in conjunction with other field services
provided by the Animal Control Officer.
Annual in city low cost rabies vaccination clinics will be held by
the County with the cooperation of those veterinarians in the areas
that wish to participate.
City of Temecula dog licenses would be sold at either of the above
clinics.
Veterinary Services
The City of Temecula would be charged any veterinarian fees incurred
in accordance with California Penal Code 597(F). The County will monitor
and review veterinary bills. This monitoring would be performed at
no cost to the city.
Ordinances/City Codes Enforcement
A. The city may wish to adopt the County Ordinances relating to Animal
Control or establish their own city codes.
1. Our recommendation would be to adopt the County Ordinances.
We would enforce whichever is applicable.
B. County will have approved citation forms printed reflecting City
of Temecula.
Contract Agreement
A. County will prepare the appropriate agreement.
1. The term will be from July 1, 1990, through June 30, 1991.
2. The agreement will provide that the overall costs shall not
exceed $80,000.00. Should the amount of $80,000.00 not be
sufficient to cover the fiscal year, the City shall notify
the County at least 60 days in advance. The County will dis-
continue services unless the City establishes other arrangements
with the County for the balance of the fiscal year.
If we can be of further assistance or should you have any questions, feel free
to contact me at (714) 358-5103.
Sincerely,
· , M.P.H.
Deputy Director of Health
for Special Services
HCH:sm
PP. O42LA1(ATXOMI
PUBLZ~
1.
LindeBans, Moore, Mufioz,
Parks, Birdsall
TCBD n-~gst (ReVised)
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and review the TeBecula Community Services
District Budget as revised in connection with Zone
A.
u~g~nss~'s Rev4sed Report on Fees %rid Oh&rqos for District
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Receive and review the Engineer's Revised Report
prepared by Willdan & Associates relating to fees
and. charges in the Tenecula Community Service
District for District services during Fiscal 1990-
1991.
DZRB~ORSRBPORTB
Next meeting:
June 26, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 PuJol Street, TeBecula, California
TEMECU C0 NITY SERVICE DISTRICT
AGE A REPORT
DEPT HD~
AB# I TITLE: Receive and review TCSD
MTG:June 19, 1'990 Budget as revised. ATTY
DEPT: TCSD/P&R CM ~
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors of
the Temecula Community Service District:
Receive and review the Temecula Community Service
District Budget as revised in connection with Zone A.
BACKGROUND: The Zone A budget has been updated to include the
most recent information regarding developments and areas of
service that were not included in the original Zone A budget.
(Other portions of the budget, the District Wide charges for park
and recreation services and the Zone B charges for streetlighting
are unchanged.) As revised, the Zone A Budget now looks like
this:
Estimated Appropriations
Department - Community Services : Zone A 019-191
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
(Revised)
(Original)
Zone Street Lighting .................. $160,188.48 ($169,070)
Zone Monument, Park and Slope Maint... 586,049.26 (273,021)
Zone Drainage Maintenance ............. 92,380.38 ( 3 3 , 5 8 8 )
TOTAL ESTIMATED APPROPRIATIONS $838,618.12 ($475,679)
While the budget has increased by 76%, the included tracts have
also increased by 58%. Also included within the increased budget
costs are two small parks, Mirada in A-12 and La Serena in A-15,
that are expected by CSA 143 to come on line during fiscal 1990-
1991.
It is this revised budget that is being spread by Willdan through
the Sub-Zones of Zone A at this time and will be included within
the Revised Engineer's Report, which is the next item on your
agenda. And it is this budget, along with the Revised Engineer's
Report, detailing the spread of charges, that will be the subject
of the July 10 public hearing.
CITY OF TEMECULA
BUD~.FT SUMMARY
Estimated Fund Balance July 1,
General Fund
Gas Tax Fund
Community Services
Estimated Revenue
Total Resources
Appropriations
Reserve for Contingency
1990:
TCSD
$ 822,000
2.479.231
3,301,231
(2.479.231)
~ 822.000
TEMECU C0 NITY SERVICE DISTRICT
AGE A REPORT
AB# Z TITLE: Receive and review TCSD DEPT
MTG:June 19, 1990 EnGineer's Revised Report on fees ATTY
DEPT: TCSD/P&R and charges for District services CM
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors of
the Temecula Community Service District:
Receive and review the EnGineer's Revised Report
prepared by Willdan & Associates relatinG to fees and
charges in the Temecula Community Service District for
District services durinG Fiscal 1990-1991;
BACKGROUND: On May 22, the Board of Directors received the
EnG±neer's Report which contained a proposed plan to spread the
cost of the park and recreation functions District-wide.
Additionally, contained within the Report were the rates and
charges for both Zones A and B, coverinG charges for services
such as landscape and drainage maintenance, and street lightinG.
The Revised Report contains the followinG changes from the May 22
Report:
Revised Zone A BudGet. This budget reflects recently
updated information regardinG additional developments
and areas of service not included in the original
budget. (Other portions of the budget, the District
Wide charges for park and recreation services and the
Zone B charges for streetliGhtinG are unchanged.)
A Parcel Analysis. This analysis, contained near the
end of the Revised Report, details how the parcels in
the TCSD are categorized, i.e., residential homes,
commercial-retail, agricultural, etc., and what portion
of the District each comprises.
Revised Text. Portions of the text were revised to
reflect legal counsel's comments and to add new
information where appropriate. The substance of the
text, however, remains as before.
In receivinG the EnGineer's Revised Report, the Board may
make comments, ask questions or direct revisions. Approval is not
a matter for consideration at this meetinG. Final action may only
be taken after the public hearinG that has been set for July 10.
As of the time this page is beinG prepared, the 'numbers'
for the revised 'spread analysis' for Zone A are beinG prepared
by Willdan, and it is therefore, not possible to comment on them
at this point. As before, this process will be completed by
week's end with results immediately forwarded to the Board.
F~M :
DA?~: June 15, 1990
TO: City Council and City Manager
.IUN. 15.15~90 2:16 PM
P [
~o June 20, ~ho day oftor ~he ~x~ meo~ng, ~h~Ch ~o w~ we w~
be lining up ~he printer.
Additionally, you will bo receiving additional information
in your Monday delivery on the Zo~o A optcad from Willdan.
~f you have any queertone between now end then, feel free ~o
cell me et (714) 995-4187. Th&nko.
}'act Sheet
OUESTZON: W~at t9 the Temscula community 8ervlce Dietflor?
t~a "TC~D", i~ a c~unit~ ~vL~ district ~rg~izad
elect~on, provides various authorized services within
~he oommvni~y, including bu~ no~ limited to
streetlighting, landscape ~aintenance, drainage
control, ~nd g~er~l p~rke ~nd reor~tton ee~i~s.
QUESTION: How dora the TC~D opera=e?
ANSWER: The TCSD, whose governing Board o~ Directors is ale0
your CLty Council, through the public meeting and
public hearing process, develops a program of services
designed to address the needs of the coanunity and
maintain and operate certain public improvements, such
aa the parkways and community streetli~htin~. Th~e
services are supported bM the rates and charges within
the VCSO.
~uring ~ie t~amal~l ~ar ~r~ Coun~ ~o local
Coun~ $e~ioO Areas. Application of thio ferule i.
~o~ in two ways.
d~ot=~o% wade 'benefit, such ~ opor~t~-ng and
maEn~aining ~he large oo~uni~y pe~k 8~ Me~gurita and
Rancho Road, are lharod by the entire district.
iddl~ionally, the district wide actlvi~ieg for the
u~mAng year w~11 include p~ring e Master Plan for
futur~ P~k a~ ~ec~atAon facilities in T~ula, a~
~11 as p~viding for ~ a~iniatrati~ and staffi~
~sts of ~he TC~D ~ th~y had d~ in the past for t~
~Y Sarvl~ Areas.
~nd. =area and charges for se~icas ~hat provide
less than a district wade benefit, such as slope or
~nefi~', with rates and charges being appll~ %o
~r~als only within t~ partieula~ ~. ~ain. duri~
this ~ransl~lonal year, ~e zones of ~enefl~ are the
~eae. The ~cloaed slip shows 2~r rs=es s~ charges
~o~ bo~h die~rio~ wide oe~i~o a~ ~one o~rgoe, i~
applicable.
0UE~TION: Vha~ ~f ~ have morm ~o~ttons a~ut the
~W~R~ Additional informmtion a~ut thm TC~D or ~bovt your
Of~ioee, 4~172 ~mineee Park Drive, Tamable, or you
moy p~ne ~he Oi~y Offioes e~ (714) 604-108~, betwoen
the ho~m of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., ~nday though