Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout050190 CC Agenda280X6 DX3~S ltO~D, TBMB~*UL~, Xnvooation .,Flag Salute Me2L~ in Order: Resolution No. 90-47 Ordinance No. 90-08 Pastor George Simmons Temecula Valley House of Praise ROX~ C/%LL: Birdsall, Lindemarts, Moore, Munoz Parks ~a~sm~x~zoss / A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public cab address the Council on items that are not listed onithe Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) ~,minutes e&ch. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item notlisted on the Agenda, a pink "Request · o Speak#iform should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called speak, please come forward and state your na~e and 9ddress, For all o2her agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the city Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.~ .NO~XC~TOTHB PUBLXC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote~. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items to be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. ~7mo A Division .o5 153 Acres into 287 Single Family Lots located · South of 'Rancho Vista Road, East and West of Kaiser Parkway and North of Pauba Road. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Receive and file. 2. Reeo.~,,t}on ns~s~..4shina a Traffic on and T~ansportation RECOMMENDATION: 2,1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 90- ~RF~OLUTXON OF T~ECXT~COU~CIL OFT HE CITY OF TEMECUL~ EBTABLXBHXNG THE ORGANXSATZON, OBJECTIVES, ~ND RF~PON~ZBZLZTIBB OF ~TEMECULATRAFFIC~NDTRANBPORT~TION COMMIBiZON Tn%~nd ~gire Postmark RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: P~iOLUTIONNO. 90- A RF~L~TIONSUPPO~TXN~CH~NGING OF P~T~DBHI~TION ~ T_~"=~ ~ZRB ~ ~~GING ~YBIB OF POBT~ Plo~ Pl&n NO~ 11234 Construction of a 68,000 square foot office building on a five acre site generally located at the north west corner of Ynez and Rancho California Road. RECOl~E~NDATION: 4.1 Set for Public Hearing on May 22, 1990. 04~7m0 04/27/9O 10. n~vaFeJde Count~Y!~o Depar~nont Agreement RECOH)iENDATION: 10.1 Accept the Ad Hoc Law Enforcement Committee report and refer to budget hearings. 11. ?-~50ver-C~oss~ Tr&ff4o Control RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Authorize staff to enter into a contractual agreement With the firm of All City Management. 12. C!o~o~ personnel sess4on to Cons,4der ]tm~ointmont of City Hanaee~ ~nPou&nt to ~ovornment Code, Sootion S49S7. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Continue this item to a meeting on May 2, 1990, 6:30 PT(, Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 13. Closed PeEso~_~o~ Session to Conside~ Appointment of City Mana~s~puFju%nt to ~ovo-nmont Code, Section S49S7. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Continue ~his item to a meeting on May 3, 1990, 6=30 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 14. 9~osod.Porson~ol Session to provide a bus tour of the City of · ene u e to now lannina conmissioners. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Continue this item to a meeting on May 3, 1990, 1:00 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 15. Assessment Distr ot 161 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 That the City Council agreement between the R~verside providing construction of the Assessment District Properties). approve by resolution, the City and the County of for the financing and improvements contained in No. 161 (Winchester P~B8Ol'.OTXON NO. gO- & RB~~ OZ' 'L'HZ ~X'L'Y COt;MC~XZ, OF 'L'HZ C~X'L'Y C~X,X~ OP~ ~ THB CK)G~ O~f P.I'~XDB ~ ]WBB~31BIIT DXBT~X~"T NO. cxTY r' u'Aon CITY &TTOR,~' RBPORT CXTY COUMCXL RBPORTB Next meeting: May 2, 1990, 6:30 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next meeting: May 3, 1990, 1:00 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next meeting: May 3, 1990, 6:30 PM, Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next scheduled meeting: May 8, 1990, 7:00 Z:~, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujo1 Street, Temecula, California. qmdl~5~l/90 5 04/27/90 CITY OF TEMECULA TO: Frank Aleshire, City Manager FROM: Tim D. Serlet, Division Manager Willdan Associates DATE: April 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Approval of Final Tract Map No. 22915, -1, -2, and -3 A Division of Approximately 153 Acres into 2S? Single Family Lots located South of Rancho Vista Road, East and West of Kaiser Parkway and North of Pauba Road BACKGROUND: The Vintage Hills Tract 22,915 consists of four phases providing for minimum 7,200 square foot lots for the development of single family detached homes. TRACT LOTS ACRES 22915-1 97 35.44 22915-2 98 92.11 22915-3 58 15.44 22915 34 11.04 287 153.03 Tract 22915 is one of several tracts comprising the Vintage Hills Residential Community. The features of the community include (see exhibit): Two community recreational areas with amenities which include tennis courts, basketball courts, swimming pools, a baseball diamond and meeting rooms. o Two half-acre park sites. o Elementary School (10 acres) o Park Site (5 acres) o Upgraded landscaping treatments including entries, slopes, etc. Upgraded architecture associated with the development concept of a "move-up" community. To date, two tracts consisting of eight development phases (Tract 22715, 22716) have recorded within the Vintage Hills Community including provisions for two recreational areas, an area park and upgraded landscaping treatments. Frank Aleshire April 23, 1990 Page Two Discussion: The tract was originally submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on February 26, 1988. The tract was tentatively approved by the Planning Commission on September 28, 1988 and by the Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988. The tentative tract map approval expires on November 8, 1990, unless an extension of time is granted by the City Council. This tract is covered under Specific Plan No. 199 Village) which was adopted by the Board of Supervisors 6, 1988. (Margarita on October The following table shows a summary of the fees paid on each phase of the tract: BREAKDOWN OF FEES Tract 22915-1 (97 lots) Traffic Mitigation Fees ........................ $14,550.00 Fire Mitigation Fees ........................... $38,800.00 Drainage Fees .................................. $33,030.00 Tract 22915-2 (98 lots) Traffic Mitigation Fees ........................ $14,700.00 Fire Mitigation Fees ........................... $39,200.00 Drainage Fees .................................. $27,121.00 Tract 22915-3 (58 lots) Traffic Mitigation Fees ........................ $ 8,700.00 Fire Mitigation Fees ........................... $13,600.00 Drainage Fees .................................. $10,289.00 Per the Margarita Village Development Agreement No. 5, $1,227,499.00 in Public Facilities and Service Mitigation Fees have also been paid. The following table shows a summary of the bonds and bonding amounts for each phase of the tract: AGREEMENTS BOND NO. AMOUNT TRACT 22915 Streets XXX PB300 11 958 $900,000 Water XXX PB300 11 958 $ 37,500 Sewer XXX PB300 11 958 $ 72,500 Frank Aleshire April 23, 1990 Page Three Monuments Materials & Labor Taxes Fire Agreement TRACT 22915-1 Streets Water Sewer Monuments Materials & Labor Taxes Fire Agreement TRACT 22915-2 Streets Water Sewer Monuments Materials & Labor Taxes Fire Agreement AGREEMENTS XXX XXX XXX AGREEMENTS BOND NO. AMOUNT PB300 11 959 $ 13,000 PB300 11 958 $505,000 PB300 12 285 $52,000 $13,600 BOND NO. AMOUNT XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX AGREEMENTS PB300 11 961 $2,589,000 PB300 11 961 $ PB300 11 961 $ PB300 11 962 $ 128,000 191,000 29,000 PB300 11 961 $1,454,000 PB300 11 282 $ 131,300 $ 38,800 BOND NO. AMOUNT XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX PB300 11 964 $1,792,500 PB300 11 964 $ PB300 11 964 $ PB300 11 965 $ 109,500 185,500 40,000 PB300 11 964 $1,043,750 PB300 12 283 $ 130,600 $ 39,200 Frank Aleshire April 23, 1990 Page Four TRACT 229~5-3 Streets Water Sewer Monuments Materials & Labor Taxes Fire Agreement AGREEMENTS BOND NO. XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX PB300 11 967 $ PB300 11 967 $ PB300 11 967 $ PB300 11 968 $ PB300 11 967 $ PB300 12 284 $ $ AMOUNT 907,000 67,000 110,000 26,400 542,000 121,900 23,200 PLANNING.003 TDSad ber! C- eix[, cC illJam c-F ost c ssocJates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS& SURVEYORS LETTER OF TRANSMll-rAL TO: City of Temecula A1-FN: June Greek WE ARE FORWARDING: ~ BY MAIL 2~XBY MESSENGER NO. OF COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 each Tract 22915-1, -2, -3 and Final 1 Conditions of Approval DATE March 30, 1990 RBF JOB NO. 24870 DESCRIPTION Tract 22915-1, and Final [] BY BLUEPRINTER -2, -3 STATUS: SENT FOR YOUR: PLEASE NOTE: [] PRELIMINARY [] APPROVAL [] REVISIONS [] REVISED [] SIGNATURE [] ADDITIONS [] APPROVED J~ USE [] DELETIONS [] RELEASED [] FILE [] CORRECTIONS [] REVIEWED [] INFORMATION [] NOT FORCONSTRUCTION REMARKS As requested for Wildan's review. We would like to be placed on the City Council Agenda for April 10, 1990 for approval of the enclosed final maps. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. COPIES TO: ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES Karen M. Ames /dd Project Planner Temecula Regional Office ii 28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE · SUITE 250" RANCHO CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA 92390 · f7141 676-8042 ,, FAX (714) 676-7240 OFFICES IN IRVINE · NEWPORT BEACH · PALM DESERT. SAN DIEGO Tentative Tract Map Nos. 22915-1, -2, -3 & -Final TRACT 22915-1 TRACT 22915-2 TRACT 22915-3 TRACT 22915 (F) 97 LOTS 35.44 ACRES 98 LOTS 29.11 ACRES 58 LOTS 15.44 ACRES 34 LOTS 11.04 ACRES PROJECT SITE JN 24870 Regional Location Map I : .:/ OFFICE OF T~IE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LeRoy D. Smoot Road Commissioner and County Surveyor County Administrative Center Mailing Address: PO Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Telephone (714) 787-6554 April 19, 1990 SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula SUBJECT: Tract Map 22915 in the First Supervisorial District SPECIFIC REQUEST: Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it is REQUESTED that you place your signature on the above referenced Map and transmit it to the Recorder's Office. All required certificates and documents have been filed and the map is ready for recordation. Acting City Engineer IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb OFFICE OF THE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LeRoy D. Smoot Road Commissioner and County Surveyor County Administrative Center Mailing Address: PO Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Telephone (714) 787-6554 April 19, 1990 SUBMITTAL TO FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~ FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula SUBJECT: Tract Map 22915 in the First Supervisorial District SPECIFIC REQUEST: Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map. All required certificates and documents have been filed and the map is ready for recordation. Acting City Engineer IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb City of Temecula Re: Tract 22915 The developer wishes to enter the following agreements to cover the improvements within this subdivision for: IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS (Bond No. PB300-11-958) WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (Service to be supplied by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-958) SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (Service to be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-958) SETTING OF LOT MONUMENTS (Bond No. PB300-11-959) SECURING TAXES (Bond No. PB300-12-285) MATERIALS AND LABOR (Bond No. PB300-11-958 in the amount of $505,000) FIRE AGREEMENT in the amount of $13,600 The above referenced bonds are issued by American Homes Assurance Company. This map complies in all respects with the provisions of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local ordinances. The dedications made on the above map are for: Lots "A" through "D", inclusive, are dedicated for public road and public utility purposes, and as part of the City of Temecula Maintained Road System. 2. Lot "E" (1 foot barrier strip) is dedicated to the City of Temecula for street and access control purposes. 3. Drainage easements are dedicated to public use. OFFICE OF THE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LeRoy D. Smoot Road Commissioner and County Surveyor County Administrative Center Mailing Address: PO Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Telephone (714) 787-6554 April 19, 1990 SUBMITTAL TO FRANK ALES~IRE, CITY MANAGER OF TEE CITY OF TEMECUT~ FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula SUBJECT: Tract Map 22915-1 in the First Supervisorial District SPECIFIC REQUEST: Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map. All required certificates and documents have been filed and the map is ready for recordation. Acting City Engineer IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb City of Temecula Re: Tract 22915-1 The developer wishes to enter the following agreements to cover the improvements within this su§division for: IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS (Bond No. PB300-11-961) WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (Water to be supplied by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-961) SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (Service to be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-961) SETTING OF LOT MONUMENTS (Bond No. PB300-11-962) MATERIAL AND LABOR (Bond No. PB300-11-961 in the amount of $1,454,000) SECURING TAXES (Bond No. PB300-12-282) FIRE AGREEMENT in the amount of $38,800 The above referenced bonds are issued by American Home Assurance Company. This map complies in all respects with the provisions of Division 2 of Title'7 of the Government Code and applicable local ordinances. The dedications made on the above map are for: Lots "A" through "J", inclusive, are dedicated for public road and public utility purposes, and as part of the City of Temecula Maintained Road System. 2. Lot "K" (1 foot barrier strip) is dedicated to the City of Temecula for street and access control purposes. 3. Drainage easements are dedicated to public use. City of Temecula Re: Tract 22915 The developer wishes to enter the following agreements to cover the improvements within this subdivision for: IMPROVEMENT Of STREETS (Bond No. PB300-11-958) WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (Service to be supplied by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-958) SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (Service to be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-958) SETTING OF LOT MONUMENTS (Bond No. PB300-11-959) SECURING TAXES (Bond No. PB300-12-285) MATERIALS AND LABOR (Bond No. PB300-11-958 in the amount of $505,000) FIRE AGREEMENT in the amount of $13,600 The above referenced bonds are issued by American Homes Assurance Company. This map complies in all respects with the provisions of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local ordinances. The dedications made on the above map are for: Lots "A" through "D", inclusive, are dedicated for public road and public utility purposes, and as part of the City of Temecula Maintained Road System. 2. Lot "E" (1 foot barrier strip) is dedicated to the City of Temecula for street and access control purposes. 3. Drainage easements are dedicated to public use. OFFICE OF THE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LeRoy D. Smoot Road Commissioner and County Surveyor County Administrative Center Mailing Address: PO Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Telephone (714) 787-6554 April 19, 1990 SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula SUBJECT: Tract Map 22915-2 in the First Supervisorial District SPECIFIC REQUEST: Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it is REQUESTED that you place your signature on the above referenced Map and transmit it to the Recorder's Office. All required certificates and documents have been filed and the map is ready for recordation. Ivan F. Tennant Acting City Engineer IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb OFFICE OF TEE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LeRoy D. Smoot Road Commissioner and County Surveyor County Administrative Center Mailing Address: PO Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Telephone (714) 787-6554 April 19, 1990 SUBMITTAL TO FRANK ALESHIRE, CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula SUBJECT: Tract Map 22915-2 in the First Supervisorial District SPECIFIC REQUEST: Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map. All required certificates and documents have been filed and the map is ready for recordation. ivan ~'.-'rennant Acting City Engineer IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb City of Temecula Re: Tract 22915-2 The developer wishes to enter the following agreements to cover the improvements within this subdivision for: IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS (Bond No. PB300-11-964) WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (Water to be supplied by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-964) SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (Service to be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-964) SETTING OF LOT MONUMENTS (Bond No. PB300-11-965) MATERIAL AND LABOR (Bond No. PB300-11-964 in the amount of $1,043,750) SECURING TAXES (Bond No. PB300-12-283) FIRE AGREEMENT in the amount of $39,200 The above referenced bonds are issued by American Home Assurance Company. This map complies in all respects with the provisions of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local ordinances. The dedications made on the above map are for: Lots "A" through "H", inclusive, are dedicated for public road and public utility purposes, and as part of the City of Temecula Maintained Road System. 2. Lots "I" and "J" (1 foot barrier strips) are dedicated to the City of Temecula for street and access control purposes. 3. Drainage easements are dedicated to public use. OFFICE OF THE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LeRoy D. Smoot Road Commissioner and County Surveyor County Administrative Center Mailing Address: PO Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Telephone (714) 787-6554 April 19, 1990 SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY CLERK OF TuR CITY OF TEMECULA FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula SUBJECT: Tract Map 22915-3 in the First Supervisorial District SPECIFIC REQUEST: Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it is REQUESTED that you place your signature on the above referenced Map and transmit it to the Recorder's Office. All required certificates and documents have been filed and the map is ready for recordation. Ivan F.~t ~ Acting City Engineer IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb OFFICE OF T~E ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LeRoy D. Smoot Road Commissioner and County Surueyor County Administrative Center Mailing Address: PO Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Telephone (714) 787-6554 April 19, 1990 SUBMITTAL TO FRANK ALESBIRE, CITY MANAGER OF TBE CITY OF TEMEC~ FROM: Acting City Engineer for the City of Temecula SUBJECT: Tract Map 22915-3 in the First Supervisorial District SPECIFIC REQUEST: Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance it is REQUESTED that the City Council approve said map. All required certificates and documents have been filed and the map is ready for recordation. Acting City Engineer IFT:GAS:MSB:rdb City of Temecula Re: Tract 22915-3 The developer wishes to enter the following agreements to cover the improvements within this subdivision for: IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS (Bond No. PB300-11-967) WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (Water to be supplied by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-967) SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM (Service to be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District) (Bond No. PB300-11-967) SETTING OF LOT MONUMENTS (Bond No. PB300-11-968) MATERIALS AND LABOR (Bond No. PB300-11-967 in the amount of $542,000) SECURING TAXES (Bond No. PB300-12-284) FIRE AGREEMENT in the amount of $23,200 The above referenced bonds are issued by American Home Assurance Company. This map complies in all respects with the provisions of Division 2 of Title 7 of the Government Code and applicable local ordinances. The dedications made on the above map are for: 1. Lots "A" through "D", inclusive, are dedicated to public road and public utility purposes, and as part of the City of Temecula Maintained Road System. 1 $ 4 6 7 10 11 12 15 14 17 21 ~4 Board of Supervisors County of Riverside RESOLUTION NO. 88-471 ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (Margarita Village) WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 6545C et seq., a public hearing was held before the Riverside County Board of Supervisors in Riverside, California on September 6, 1988,.to amend Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village), which had previously been adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors through Resolution No. 86-355 (dated August 26, 1986); and, WHEREAS, all the procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Riverside County Rules to Implement the Act have been met, and Environmental Assessment No. 32318, prepared in connection with Amendment ~o. 1 to Specific Plan No. 199, is sufficiently detailed so that all the significant effects of the project on the environment and measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen such effects have been evaluated in accordance with the above-referenced Act and Rules; and, WHEREAS, the matter was discussed fully' with testimony and documentatiom presented by the public and affected government agencies; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED by the Board of Supervisorsl of the County of Riverside, in regular session assembled on October 4, 1988, that: 1. The proposed amendment will amend Specific Plan No. 199 which has been incorporated into the County's Comprehensive General Plan. 1 2 $ 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 14 17 ZO 22 24 ~6 27 28 e Impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo Rat, whose habitat is contained within the proposed 127 acre addition, will be mitigated through a Memorandum of Understanding established with the Department of Fish and Game or participation in a county mitigation program. 5. The proposed specific plan amendment will not cause any significant environmental impacts. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the Riverside County Rules to Implement the Act, that it has reviewed and considered Environmental Assessment No. 32318 in evaluating Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 199, and the Negative Declaration therefor is hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 199, on file with the Clerk of the Board, including the final conditions of approval and exhibits, is hereby adopted as the amended Specific Plan of Land Use for the real property shown on the plan, and said real property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the amended specific plan unless the plan is repealed or further amended by the Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that copies of Amendment No. 1 to Specific Plan No. 199 shall be placed on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board, in the Office of the Planning Director and in the Office of the Director of Building and Safety, and that no applications for subdivision maps, conditional use permits or other development approvals shall be accepted for the real property shown on Amendment No, 1 to Specific Plan No. 199, unless such applications are substantially in accordance therewith. RG: mp ;mcb RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE ORGANIZATION, OBJECTIVe, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF A TEMECULA TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: Establishment of Commission: Pursuant to Section 12.01.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code, there is hereby created an advisory commission which shall be known as the "Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission." SECTION 2: Commission Membership: The Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission shall consist of five (5) members to be nominated and appointed pursuant to Chapter 2.06.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code. SECTION 3: Staff Assistance: The City Manager shall ensure that adequate staff will be allocated to provide necessary technical and clerical assistance to the Commission. SECTION 4: Time and Place of Meetings: The Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission shall establish a regular date, time and place for Commission meetings, which shall be open to the public. Said meetings shall occur no less frequently than once a week. SECTION 5: Term: The Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission shall continue in effect pursuant to Chapter 2.06.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code. SECTION 6: Duties of Commission: The duties of the Temecula Traffic and Transportation Commission shall be as follows: Review and make recommendations to the City council on traffic matters within the City such as speed zones, stop signs and signals, pavement markings, traffic design and engineering. The commission will also recommend traffic enforcement measures and coordinate City activities with the California Highway Patrol, Sheriff, County Road Department and other regional traffic management and planning agencies. Re,os48 Resolution No 90- Page 2 Be Review and make recommendations to the City Council concerning Regional Mass Transit, bus systems, Dial-A-Ride and other transportation issues. SECTION 7: This Resolution shall become effective concurrently with the effective date of the City Ordinance adding Chapter 12.01 of the City Municipal Code. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of May, 1990. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEALI Resos-48 April 16, 1990 Frank Aleshire, City Manager city of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, Ca 92390 Dear Frank, As I related to you on the phone, the Coalition of Chambers in Rive~£d~oun~y~have long been concerned with the San Bernardino 'Post~'~.~6~i~our~mail.- The Coalition will be meeting with Postal o'f~-i~--i~s in early May to try to get the postmark changed from San~na.~~o~.to-g'-Inland Empire". The advantage to all of us is one of more appropriate identity. The Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors has passed a resolution to change the postmark and we are asking the City Coun~'~-~I'so'-pass the enclosed resolution as well. Coali~.r~of_-Chambers of Commerce Gr.eater Riverside Chamber of Commerce Attention: Art Pick 4~aln Street, Riverside, Ca. 92501 Thank you for your help. Best regards, Leigh Engdahl General Manager 40945 County Center Drive, Suite C, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 676-5090 RESOLUTION NO 90- A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CHANGING OF POST MARK DESIGNATION TO INLAND EMPIRE AND ENCOURAGING ANALYSIS OF POSTAL SERVICE AREA WHEREAS, The State of California has identified the INLAND EMPIRE as one of the regions of the "Californias," and WHEREAS, The INLAND EMPIRE, is defined as the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, the eastern portion of Los Angeles County, and the 47 incorporated cities herein, and WHEREAS, The INLAND EMPIRE, of the country, and is one of the fastest growing areas WHEREAS, It is the desire of the residents of the INLAND EMPIRE to strengthen the sense of region and community, and WHEREAS, There would be substantial benefit to the businesses and residents in the INLAND EMPIRE to enhance its national and international name recognition, and WHEREAS, The City of Temecula values its identity as a business and residential location in the INLAND EMPIRE, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Temecula supports an "INLAND EMPIRE" postmark on all mail processed at the San Bernardino General Mail Facility, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Temecula supports analysis of the service area of the San Bernardino General Mail Facility such that all INLAND EMPIRE mail would be processed at that location. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May, 1990. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk [SEAL] 3/Re~os-50 04/24/90 CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT AB# MTG DEPT TITLE: Plot Plan No. 11234, Amendment #2 Location: Northwest corner of Rancho Ca. Road and Ynez Road. DEPT CITY ATTY CITY MGR Recommendation Staff recommends: That the City Council set Plot Plan No. 11234 for public hearing on May 22, 1990 in accordance with the provisions of City Ordinance No. 13-89. Backqround/Discussion Plot P~an No. 11234, Amendment #2, proposes the construction of a 67,553 square foot office building on a 5.17 acre site. The project was tentatively approved at a Riverside County Planning Director's hearing on Feb. 26, 1990. On March 22,1990, the County forwarded the project to the Temecula City Council with recommendations to ADOPT the Negative Declaration and APPROVE the plot plan as amended. The County Staff report indicated the project is a part of Specific Plan No. 149. A copy of the specific plan, the environmental analysis and initial study, and the project's findings for approval require closer analysis by the City Staff prior to approval. Fiscal Import Undetermined. Fees to be Collected 1. Flood Control $3,821.20 2. Traffic signal mitigated through overlying Parcel Map No. 17454. City M~nager Comment This is a.major commercial development at a congested intersection. County staff needs to explain mitigation measures before Council's action. 1'0 Ri VI'~RSII)F. PROJECT LOCATION R A N¢?! I¢) (-A! .11'01~.N I TO ,NAN I)IF, G() VICINITY MAP ill DATE: 3-22-90 CASE TYPE & NO. Plot P]au No. 11234 Amende0 ~o. 2 TO: CITY OF TEHECULA FROM: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT This item.should be: Set and noticed for public hearing Placed on agenda as a receive and file item Action taken at your discretion SUBMITTAL TO THE CIlIf COUNCIL CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING SUBJECT: PLOT PLAN 11234, Amended No. 2 SUBMITTAL DATE: 3/22/90 RECOMMENDED MOTION: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for E.A. 33909 and APPROVAL of PLOT PLA~I 11234, Amended No. 2, Planning Correction No. 1 based on the following: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan and Ordinance 348. 2. The proposal is compatible with area development 3. Environmental concerns can be mitigated at the development stage through the conditions of approval. PROJECT LOCATION North of Rancho California Road, and West of Ynez Road. BACKGROUND: GENERAL PLAN: Southwest Area Community Plan a, b. C, d. ZONING: a. SITE: M-SC b. ADJACENT: I4-SC, C-1/C-P LAND USE/AREA DEVELOPMENT: a. SITE: Vacant LAND USE: "C" (Commercial} OPEN SPACE/CONS.: Areas Not Designated As Open Space COMMUNITY POLICIES: Specific Plan No. 149 ADJACENT: Commercial b. ADJACENT: Vacant, Commercial, Industrial MAJOR ISSUES: Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, Liquefaction, 100 Year Floodplain, Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat. Subsidence, JA:gs PINKS PLANNINg DIRECTOR' S ~EARIN~ CASE SUMMARY DATE: 02-26-90 CASE NO. PLOT PLaN 11234, Amended No. 2 E.A. No. 33909 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: A 67,553 square foot office building and parking structure on 5.17 acres north of Rancho California Rd., and west of Ynez Rd. AREA: Rancho California SPHERE OF INFLUENCE: Within the City of Temecula GENERAL PLAN: Southwest Area Community Plan , a. LAND USE: "C" (Commercial) b. OPEN SPACE/CONS.: Areas Not Designated As Open Space c. COMMUNITY POLICIES: Specific Plan No. 149 d. ADJACENT: Commercial ZONING: a. SITE: C-1/C-P b. ADJACENT: C-1/C-P LAND USE/AREA DEVELOPMENT: a. SITE: Vacant b. ADJACENT: Commercial / Retail MAJOR ISSUES: Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, Liquefaction, Subsidence, 100 Year Floodplain, Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat· RECOMMENDATION: ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for E.A. 33909 and APPROVAL of PLOT PLAN 11234, Amended No. 2, based on the following: The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan and Ordinance 348. The proposal is compatible with area development. Environmental concerns can be mitigated at the development stage through the conditions of approval. Bedford Properties P.O. Box 755 Temecula, CA 92390 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APP~J)VAL PLOT PLaN NO. 11234, Amenc~ed No. 2 Project Description: Office building and parking garage· Assessor's Parcel No.:921-270-032,33,35,36 District/Area: Rancho California The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for a 67,553 square foot office building and a parking garage. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning PLOT PLAN NO. 11234, Amended No. 2. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning mf substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A, Amen~ No. 2, or as amended by these conditions. e In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one (1) year or more, this approval shall become null and void. 6. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the County Road Department's transmittal dated 10-19-89, a copy of which is attached. PLOT PLaN NO. 11234 Conditiono of Appro~l Page 2 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated 10-05-89, a copy of which is attached. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated 10-16-89, a copy of which is attached. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated 10-02-89, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section's transmittal dated 00-00-90, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Building and Safety - Grading Section's transmittal dated 11-29-89, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Geologist's transmittals dated 08-28-89 and 01-12-90, copies of which are attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Transportation's transmittal dated 05-30-89, a copy of which is attached. Prior to the issuance of building permits, six (6) copies of a Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches. The irrigation plan shall be in accordance with Ordinance No. 348, section 18.12 and include a rain shut-off devi~e. In addition, the plan will incorporate the use of in-line check valves, or sprinkler heads with incorporated check valves to prohibit low head drainage. PLOT PLAN NO. 11234 Conditions of Approval P&ge 3 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. A minimum of 230 parking spaces shall be required in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 230 parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A, Amended No. 2. The parking area shall be surfaced with aspbaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base. A minimum of five (5), handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit A, Amended No. 2. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning ." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Road Department Riverside County Flood Control Environmental Health Fire Department Building & Safety - Grading Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety. If the applicant proposes to install signage, a separate plot plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department prior to any sign installation, accompanied by fees set forth in Ordinance No. 348. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B. ~LOT L:'L]~ NO. 1X234 Conditions of Page 4 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit M-1 (Materials Board) and Exhibit M-2 (Color Elevations). These are as follows: Use Material Exterior Plaster Metalwork Glazing Glass Mullions Stone Roof Tile Color Amarillo white Lt. Metalic Redwood Blue-Green Reflective Lt. Medium Bronze Red Sandstone Custom Blue-Grey Burgandy (Materials added at Director's Hearing 2/26/90) Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Screening A total of one (1) trash enclosure which is adequate to enclose a total of one (1) bin shall be centrally located in the project, and shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. The enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and a gate which screens the bin from external view. Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and within the parking areas. All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. "This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of any building permit by the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall certify that the intended structure or building is safe and structurally integrated. This certification shall be based upon, but not be limited to, the site specific seismic, geologic and geotechnical conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated." PLOT PLaN NO. 11234 Conditions of App=oval Page 5 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. A total of 16 bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate bicycle access to the project area. Nine (9) of those racks shall be either; Class I, or Class II in an enclosed, lockable area. The remaining seven (7) racks shall be Class II. Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kV or greater, shall be installed underground. No human occup~n=y will be allowed in the area designated as the attic. This space is to be used for equipment only, per Ord. 348 section 18.20(b). Prior to any use allowed by this plot plan, the applicant shall obtain clearance from the Department of Building and Safety - Land Use Section that the uses found on the subject property are in conformance with Ordinance No. 348. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. JA:jsa 02-22-90 OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR ROAD C:Df~q!~:~l-~ & ~ 5L~VL"YOR October 19, 1989 COUNTY ADM~IISTRATIV£ C~IT'r..R HAU. D4G ADOR!~ P.O. BOX 1090 WV~RS/D£. CAJ~ORNIA 92502 (714) TB7-6554 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Re: (Office Building) Plot Plan 11234 - Amend Team 5 - SMD %9 AP %111-111-111-9 Ladies and Gentlemens The Road Department has not required a traffic study for this project as we have a traffic study on file which addresses traffic impacts in the immediate area. This study indicates a projected T.~EL OF S~RVICR "C' at the Rancho California Road/Ynez Road intersection. The Comprehensive General Plan circulation policies relative to Category II Land Uses states= "A minimum of level of service "C# is necessary for any new Category II land use. As such, the proposed project is inconsistent with this General Plan policy. Therefore, the Road Department reco~ends the following conditions= With respect to the referenced item, ~he recommendations= conditions of approval for the above Road Department has the following Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at no cost to any government agency= Sufficient right of way along Rancho California Road shall be conveyed for public use to provide for a 55 foot half width right of way or in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. ® Sufficient right of way along Ynez Road shall be conveyed for public use to provide for a 50 foot half width right of way or in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. COUNTY ADMiNXSTRAT1V~ CENTT. R · 4080 LF~ON ~ · RIVEXSiDF., CAUTORNUL 92501 Plot Plan 11234 - Amend #2 October 19, 1989 Page 2 The traffic signal mitigation for this project has been met by Parcel Map 17454. Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this permit, and prior to doing any work within the State highway right of way, clearance and/or an encroachment permit must be obtained by the applicant from the District 08 Office of the State Department of Transportation in San Bernardino. Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall construct the following at no cost to any government agency~ ® Rancho California Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving~ reconstruction~ or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Co~issioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 or in accordance with the General Plan right of way standard or as approved by the Road Commissioner. ® Ynez Road shall be /mprovedwith concrete curb and gutter located 38 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving~ reconstruction~ or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 50 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 101 or in accordance with the General Plan right of way standard or as approved by the Road Commissioner. Asphalt emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen d~ys following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. Standard 35 foot curb return, cross access ramps shall be constructed Ordinance 461 where applicable. gutter, spandrel and in accordance with The landdivider will provide a left turn lane on Rancho California Road at the intermection with Ynez Road as approved bytheRoadDepartment. 10. Six foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be conmtructed along Rancho California Road and Ynez Road in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). Plot Plan 11234 - Amend #2 October 19, 1989 Page 3 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for main- tenance by County. Major drainage is involved on th~s project and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Commissioner. Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section 11.1. All work done within County right of way shall have an encroachment permit. The single driveway shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. The single entrance driveway shall be channelized with concrete curb and gutter to prevent "beck-on" parking and interior drives from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum distance of 35 feet measured fr~n face of curb. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with PM 17454. S~reet lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the development. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the development is within an existing assessment dis~rict. If not, the land owner shall file after receiving tentative approval, for an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in pursuant to Governmental Code Section 56000 et. seq. The applicant shall com~ly with the' Cal~rans recon~end- atione as outlined in their letter da~ed May 30, 1989. Plot Plan 11234 - Amend Octobtr 19, 1989 Page 4 20. Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. LJ~ Jw °~ng. Unit ~ Supervisor County of Riverside RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. TO: DATE: A~TN: Jeff _l FROM: --~MAR~IN~Z ,'-'-'~,.'~'_' R-~NMENTAL HEALTH $PEC LALIST IV RE: PLOT PLAN 11234, AKE~ED NO. 2 October 5, 1989 Environmental Health Services has reviewed Amended No. 2 dazed September 22, 1989 . Our currenz conanents will remain as seated in our memo da~ed June 7, 1989. SM:tac OEN. FORM 4, (Rev. a/aT) County of Rivers.Ae TO: FROM: RE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: June 7, 1989 A~: l~chae(~Bacon , s~ ~T~:~z, ~,~O~NT,~ H~T~ S~'EC~L~ST ~V PLOT PLAN 11234 Environmental Health Services has reviewed :he above plot plan and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in :his area. Prior to any building plan submittals, will-serve letters from the water and sewerins agencies will be required. SM:tac GEN, FORM 4, (i~v. 8/87) KENNETH I- EDWARDS C:HI~F IrNGINEER 1995 M.a~qKE'T S'KREE'r P.Oo BOX 1033 '11~L~PHONE (?IA) 78'7-2015 FAX NO. (714) 788-9965 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE. CAtJFORNIA 92502 Riverside County P1 anning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional~e.~N/~43,h~ P1 anner Are a: /~'-y~-~ u/._ ~ Re: /0o. Z. We have reviewed this case and have the following comments: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of ]8 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." This project is in the Area drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~les and regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the impl led density. u/""The District's report dated ~ _~//..~:w.~ is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. This project is a part of . The project will be free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements have been constructed in accordance with approved plans. The attached comments apply. V!~tM o~trul y yours, 'Civil Engineer DATE: O~J- ((;1 (ffS~ K~.NNETH L. EDWARDS 1995 MARKET STREET I~.0. BOX 1033 TELEPHONE (71A) 787-2015 FAX NO. (714) 788-9965 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 September 1, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California 92501 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANN~G DEPARTMENT Attention: Regional Team No. 5 Jeff Adams Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Plot Plan 11234 Amended No. 1 This is a proposal to construct an office building and parking structure on 4.1 acres in the Temecula Valley area. The site is located on the northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. Storm runoff from 120 acres is tributary to this site from the southeast. In the past, water flowed overland, in streets and between several ponds in this area via culverts under roadways. Now, Plot Plan 10579 and Plot Plan 10079 located to the south and west, respectively, are proposing the construction of a storm drain that, in conjunction with streets and existing culverts, will safely convey these flows past this project. The storm drain would outlet flows to an existing low area along the east side of the freeway. The County Board of Supervisors has adopted the Murrieta Creek/ Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of collecting drainage fees. Those fees are used to construct needed flood control facilities within the particular area. The Area Drainage Plan fees apply to new land divisions and other types of new development. Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff. These increases are particularly troublesome in those watersheds where an Area Drainage Plan has been adopted. In order to miti- gate the downstream impacts brought about by increased runoff, the District recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans and Public Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation charge. Mitigation charges, where appropriate, will be similar to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate. -' - 2 - September 1, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department Re: Plot Plan 11234 Amended No. 1 Following are the District's recommendations: A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The new development in this case includes a total of q.1 acres. At the current fee rate of $932.00 per acre, the mitiga- tion charge equals $3,821.20. The charge is. payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Construction of new buildings on this site should not begin until construction has started on the storm drains proposed by Plot Plan 10579 and Plot Plan 10079. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be contained within drainage easements. Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should be re- corded and a copy submitted to the District prior to the issuance of permits· The property's street and lot grading should be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area and outlet points. Development of this property should be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure that watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not diverted from one watershed to another. This may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading. Riverside County Planning Department Re: Plot Plan 11234 Amended No. 1 - 3 - September 1, 1989 A copy of the improvement plans and grading plans along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District for review and ap- proval prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. c: Field Paoli Architects V er~ truly yo;~, /UOHN H. KASHUBA Senior Civil Engineer AD:seb Phn~S & [.nsine~rins 0ttic~ 46-209 Oa~ 5tre~ Suite 405 indio, CA 92201 (619) ~42-8886 PJI/DGID£ COUNTY FI!~ DEPARTMENT IN COOPElaTION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION GLEN J. NEWMAN 10-02-89 I%,.,,mS & Zasi.~.S Once 4080 Laaon Slr~, Suite l 1L ~, CA 92501 (7t4) 787.-~ TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: MICHAEL BACON PLOT PLAN 11234 AMENDED ~2 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department recoumends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all co~mercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. e Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM for a 3 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system (6"x4"x2½x2½), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the racer system is in accordance ~rlth the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." e Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flo~ of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). i statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. RE: PP 11234 Page 2 7. Install a supervised water flow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as per Uniform Building Code. 8. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must appear on the title page of the building plans. 9. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 10. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 11. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $345.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. 13. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of 25C per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. 14. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to install a fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. 15. Building must meet Riverside County Ordiance 546, section 801 on high rise "Life safety support systems." 16. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and Safety. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist Riverside County Planning Department Attention: Jeff Adams County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: 'Plot Plan 11234, c~,~-~---,~'J Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site signage will be required. Prior to issuance of grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain all necessary permits required by the Department of Building and Safety for the relocation or demolition of any existing structure(s}. If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department the approved plans must be submitted to the Land Use Division concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review. Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety review, one complete set of approved conditions from Planning Department must be attached. Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping may be required. Consult your Conditions of Approval. Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance is required from the following: o Temecula Unified School District Administration (714)682-8840 * (714)787-2020 Plannning Department PP 11234 January 24, 1990 Page 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall conform with an approved floor plan indicating the maximum number of tenants allowed. Each space shall be labeled with a number or a letter. Where no specific uses for proposed structures are indicated, Building and Safety may require additional Planning Department approvals. Yours truly, Vaughn ~Sarkisian Land Use Technician COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTHENT GRADING SECTION TO: PLANNING FROM: TONY HARMON DATE: 11/29/89 RE: P.P. 11234 The "Gradin~ Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site. The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Gradin~ Section" recommends approval of this project if the following conditions are included. Prior to commencin~ any ~radin~ in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a ~ading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety department. Prior to issuance of any buildin~ permit, the property owner shall obtain a ~ading permit and approval to construct from the Buildin~ and Safety Department. Provide verification that any existing E~ading was permitted and that approval to construct was obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Plant and irrigate fill slopes ~reater than or equal to and/or cut slopes ~reater than or equal to 5' in vertical height with ~ass or ~round cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical heiEht are to be provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see form 284-47. Grading in excess performance security Safety department. of 199 cubic yards will require to be posted with the Buildin~ and In instances where a ~rading plan involves import or export, 'prior to obtainin~ a ~rading permit, the applicant shall have obtained approval for the import/export location from the BuildinE and Safety department- this may roquire a written clearance from the Pl~-nin~ Department. A notarized letter of Permission, from the affected property owners, is r~quired for anF proposed offsite E~adin~. NOTE: For the f~ual ~radin~ plan, please provide the applicable information from Buildin~ and Safety Department ~radin~ forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86, and 284-46. Th~-k you. :iiVE MDE councu. LAnnin( DEPA:ICiTIEnC August 28, 1989 Lockwood-Stngh & Associates 1944 Corner Avenue Los Angeles, California 90025 Attention: I~r, Awtar Stngh I~r. John V. Doyle Hr. Russell G. Hatter SUBJECT: Liquefaction Hazard Project Ref. 4025-92 Plot Plan 11234 APN: 921-270-019,20,21,22 County Geolo91c Report No. 529 Rancho California Area 6entlemen: We have revtewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entttled "Report of Geotechntcal Investigation, Proposed Offtce Butldtng 2 and Parktng Structure 2, Rancho California Plaza, Ynez Road, Rancho California, CA," dated ~y 19, 1989. Your report determined that: The granular sotls below the ground water table at the stte my be susceptible to setsmtc 11cluefaction to a depth of approximately 40 feet below the extsttng ground surface. Differential settlement at the surface resulting from liquefaction of the sotls underlying the stte ts esttmted to be two and one-half to three tnches. Thts wtll affect Improvements supported on-grade, such as the floattrig slab (tf selected) for the proposed garage structure, walkway slabs-on-grade, landscape planter walls and other auxiliary landscape structures, lake and appurtenant lake structures and underground utt 11ttes. 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 Lockwood-S1ngh & Associates -2- August 28, 1989 Your report recomended that: The proposed offtce butldtng and parktrig structure should be supported by drtven ptles extending through the upper 40 feet of potentially 11queftable sotls and penetrating tnto dense sotls at a depth of at least 45 feet below the extsttng ground surface. 2. Oetatled pt1, foundation recomendattons concerning esttmted allowable axtal load capactty of 12-1rich square prestressed concrete drtven ptles., Indicator (test) ptles, reductions for pt1, groups, pullout capactty, ptle settlement, and ptle Installation were mde tn your report. 3. The lower level floor slab of the proposed offtce butldtng should be structurally supported by the recommended pile foundation. The lower floor slab of the proposed parking structure my be either structurally supported by the recommended pile foundation or be designed as as floattrig slab. The destgn of the floatlng slab for the parktng structure should be undertaken by the pro:iect structural engtneer and take tnto consideration the anticipated trafftc load and the esttmted differential settlement resulting from posstble liquefaction of the underlying stte solls. The proposed parking structure (tf a floating slab ts selected), and areas for proposed exterior nonstructural slabs-on-grade or auxiliary structures not supported on piles should be provtded with a four foot thtck compacted fill blanket. For the proposed parktrig structure (tf a floating slab ts selected), the compacted ftll blanket shall extend a mtntmm horizontal tit stance ftve feet beyond the footprint of the proposed structu re. It ts our optnton that the report ms prepared tn a competent mnner and satisfies the additional tnformtton requested under the California Environmental ~allty Act revte~ and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Ftnal approval of the report ts hereby gtven. %t should be noted that County Geologic Report No. 190 was previously prepared for thts property and surrounding Rancho California Plaza area. Thts report also der, mined that the stte ts subject to sotl liquefaction. Stnce your -'-- Lockwood-Stngh & Associates - 3 - August 28, 1989 report ts more spectftc to the proposed Plot Plan, the reco~eendattons nede tn your report for mitigation of liquefaction potential shall be adhered to tn the destgn and construction of thts project. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANN:[NG DEPARTMENT CEG-1205 SAK:rd c.c. Bedford Properties - Mary Jane Jagodztnskt Herron + Rumnsoff Architects ~Russ Rumansoff Planntng Team 5 - Jeff Adams ~ Buildino and Safety - Norm Lostbom (2) :IiVE:i iDE councv PLAnnin DEP, :IClTtEnC January 12, 1990 Converse Consultants Znland Empire 630 East Brier Drtve, Suite 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Attention: Mr. Davtd B. Simon Mr. Howard A. Spellman SUBJECT: A1qutst-Prtolo Special Studies Zone Project No. 89-81-143-0! Plot Plan 11234 APN: 921-270-019 thru 022 County Geologtc Report No. 629F Rancho California Area Gentlemen: We have reviewed your report entitled "Location of the Wildomar Fault: A Literature Review, Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, Proposed Office Building 2, Rancho California Plaza, Rancho California, CA,' dated September 18, 1989, your response to County review dated December 14, 19B9, and conq)actton trench backfill letter dated January 8, 1990. Your report determined that: 1. No active faults or extensions of active faults are known to pass through the subject property. During the anticipated life of the proposed structure, the subject site will be subjected to moderate to strong ground shaking, related to seismic activity associated with nearby and distance faults. 3. According to the Lockwood-Sing Znvesttgation (County Geologic Report 629L), the subject site has a high potential for liquefaction. Your report recoe~nended that: 1. Development of the property for commercial use is satisfactory from a surface fault rupture standpoint. Ourtng site development, portions of the exploratory trench that will underlte the proposed structures and to a distance of 10 feet outside of the structures and parking areas shall be excavated to the bottom of the trench and recompacted. Recmmended specifications for placement of compacted ftll are presented in Appendix A of your January 8, 1990 response letter. 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 4~209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 Page 2 Hr. Davtd B. S1mon Hr. Howard A. Spellman January 12, 1990 It ts our optnton that the report was prepared tn a competent manner consistent wtth the present mstate-of-the-art" and satisfies the requirements of the A1qutst-PrJolo Spectal Studtes Zones Act, the associated Riverside County Ordinance No. 547. Ftnal approval of thts report ts hereby gtven. The recommendations made tn your report for mitigation of seismic/geologic hazards shall be adhered to tn the design and construction of thts project. Very truly yours, R:[VE:RSZDE: COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTRENT · £ngt neet1 ng Geo1~g'1 st/' CEG-1205 t SAK:gs c.c. ParyJane Jagodztnskt - Bedford Properties Russell Rumansoff - Herron & Rumansoff - Architects Norm Lostbom -Butldtng & Safety (2) Callfo~nla Dtvtslon of Mines and Geology - Earl Hart Planntng Team 5 - Jeff Adams DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION D;S~ICT S, P.O. IOX ~31 May 30, 1989 Development Review 08-Riv-15-4.98/5.23 Your Reference: PP 11234 Rancho California Plaza Planning Department Attention Mr. Michael Bacon County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Bacon: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Plot Plan No. 11234 located easterly of 1-15, northerly of Rancho California Road, westerly of Ynez Road in Rancho California. Please refer to the attached Development Review Form which documents Caltrans~ requirements for this project. Conformance with these conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachment Permit. If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Thomas J. Neville at (714) 383-4384. Very truly yours, H. N. LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer Art. ~tLTRAN$ (Your Reference) Plan checker DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ~ORM Date (Co Rte PM) WE WOULD LIKE TO NOTE: ~ticm within presemt or proposed State right of ~y should be inv~gated for poten~-I haz~ ~ (asbest~s, petrify1% etc.) and mitigated as per requ~ts of ~ plans are suetted, pl~e conform to th~ requ~ts of tha attached '}~xk~". This will expedite thin review process and t~ required for Plan {~. Although the m-affic and drainage generated by this pro~ do not app~r to have a significant effect ~n the state hig~y system, cl:~",.siderat. ia~ ~ be j~..ven t,o r, ha o,~,l-~ive effect of c~mtinued develc~_ It apes that r2~ traffic and drainage germrated by this prop~ ~uld have a significant effect an tha state high~y s~ of r~ mr~m. Any mmasuras _~ec_~y to mir. i~mte ~ traffic and dr~e This portic~ of state highly is incb,d~d in the Cmli{omia M~-'t~r PI~ of State Hig~ys ELigible for Offic~ Scenic }~gh~ay Designat_ion, and in tha future your agency may wish to lave this route officially designated as a state scenic highway. ~ portira of state high~my has been offJcdm~y d~gnated as a state ~c big~y, and d~o~t in this corridor should be ccmpatible with the sc~c high~y c~nc~pt. It is rmog.~l that thar~ is considerable public cor~_ern about noise levels ad~t to h~av~y traveled hig~ys. Land develo~mt, in order to be compatible wi~h this c~c__~m, may require special noise attenuation m~ures. Development of property should include any ~m~c__~ry noise attmmuaticm. WE REQUEST THAT THE IT~'IS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to provide half-width on the state highway. Normal street improvements to provide__ half-width on the state highway. Curb and gutter, State Standard __along the state highway. Parking shall be prohibited along the state highway by painting the curb red and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" signs. radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state highway. A standard wheelchair ramp must be provided in the returns. A positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit physical access to the state highway. Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the state highway. Vehicular access to the state highway shall be provided by existing public road connections. Vehicular access to the state highway shall be provided by__ driveways. standard / ~ Veh/~ ~M'~i S~ll not be prov2d_~4 with~~ of the/nr~r~ec=±o~ ~= Vehicu.l~' acce~ to the m-cate highly sinai be provided by a rood-type connecticxx. Vehicu]~ acce~ cc~m sl~qll be l~ved at l~t ~ch~n t. he scare ~.~y r~ht of ~y. Access points to r2~ sta~e hisbray sl~ll be developed Ln a nm~.r r. hac for ~ a3z~g the sua:e Ltnds~ al~ the state h.i.81'r,,ay ~nll be low and forgiving in nacure. Can~~ s~1~ be ~iven to the provision, or future prov~, of sisr~r. io~ and lighr_in~ of r~ inl~c~ of ~xi tl~ state .hi-J~ey. Farkir~ lot shnll be devo/oped in a mnnar that ~ll not cause any vi~)ic,,l~r ~m)vm~ent con~]J. cts, inr~,~i~n8 parkinB stall enr. z-~ce and exit, wid~in of uhe enu-m-~.s from the state hig~uy. Handicap t:~:i.ng slm.U not be developed in the busy driv~y enurance ar~m. Care s~l I be takan ~t~ developin~ tYd~ propert7 to p~eserve and perpetuate U'.e ex:LsLtnS draimge ixmttarn of the ~-~ate hiS~y. PartiodAr considerati(m should be 8ive~ to cu~tive 2ncre~ storm rimoff to insure ~hat a hiGl~.ay drainage problen ~ not cruated. Any r~ no/~e at~enuauton~ be provided as part of u~e develop.'~t of tXis property. ~/4 Please refer ~o atr~cl~o addi~onal ccrmunts. WE REQUEST: .J~ A ~opy of shy oa~d2~ of approval or revised approval. : ~ _~A copy of any ~ts provicLL-k~ additional sur~ higl~uy right of ~y upon recordation of the nep. WE REQUEST TiIE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEU DURING THE APPROVAL PROCESS: Any proposal~ ~o furrier dew~lop r. bAs pro~y. A ~ of ~ ~f~ ~ ~~ stay. A~~tof ~~orT~t ~ A ~ ~t of ~ ~ f~ ~y ~~ ~fi~n ~ s~ ~y m~t of ~>'. ~ A d~ ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~8e P~ for u~ ~y ~ a~i ~ble. Date: May 30, 1989 R~v-15-4.98/5.23 (Co-Rte-PM) PP 11234 Rancho Calif. Plaza (Your Reference) ~nDTTTONAL COMNR. NTS: 1. Delineate state right-of-way boundaries on all sheets. The native soil in this area is very erosive and therefore erosion control such as hydro-seeding shall be applied; in addition, the "stepping of slopes" should be considered. Both the erosion control and highway landscaping must be performed according to Caltran's standards. 4. Plans must show existing and proposed grading (off/on site). Due to the magnitude of this proposal and the construction explosion (residential, commercial), the developer should contribute to the state highway improvements necessary to maintain the existing flow patterns. In addition, we recommend that this development participate in the "Rancho California Plaza Specific Plan No. 149" to mitigate its impact on state highway. Due to an increasing demand for development within this area, Calftans requires each development to mitigate its share of drainage runoffs. · Hydraulic calculations must utilize drainage runoffs with respect to the total development (on/off site) on both sides of Empire Creek. The above ~omments represent a preliminary review (conceptual rev%ew) only: It Ks presumed ~.hat once the above comments have been addressed, appl~cation for a permit will be made in the usual. manner. At that time, a complete plan package should be submitted for review. If you have any questions regarding Caltrans permit procedure requirements, please call Mr. Bruce Gregg at (714) 383-4501. CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT AS# MTG DEPT TITLE: Plot Plan No. 10717 Location: 40750 County Center Drive DEPT HD./~ CITY ATTY CITY MGR .~' Recommendation That the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Plot Plan No. 10717. based on the findings contained in the Staff report and subject to the attached conditions of approval, Discussion / Backqround This project proposes the construction of a 116,763 square foot warehouse/distribution center on a 5.6 acre site. The application was tentatively approved by the Riverside County Planning Director on January 22, 1990. The item was forwarded to the City of Temecula for action on March 15, 1990. The project has been reviewed relative to Ordinance No. 348 requirements and is consistent with area development. Fiscal Impact Not determined. Fees to be Paid Flood Control District: Paid with overlying parcel map $1,886.00. Traffic Signal Fees: Paid with overlying parcel map $51,760.00. 1)1) I0'"/I"1 m m r- m Ill /~ANC:HO CALLCORNIA WAREHOUSE i , HIMES PETERS MASON ARCHITECTS. INC. qiVE~l)iDi COUrlb'~., PL rlrHfici. DEP&qCfilEi~ i~ES March ZZ,1990 PI. ANfiI~iG CGP, RECTIOfl NO. 3 liE:' Met FIn I~. 107.~17__, ~I.c:£o ~1 R0ded m~dftloM. ' the PLANNING CORRECTIur4 .u. ~ ~,k,'~" "'". ~,~ aRielted ' 1Ms action ~y be ,plmled to the [I ~lannfng CuBdssln [] ~ of ~s~~ in lira1 ef ~ ~fm Is I~le~rm~fesam-~11c doseph A.. Rf~s. Plann4ng DI~ APN; i-110-CI46-4 .cc:9Z'~plf.t , v, Ftle REVISE0 2/~0 rid1/IBI111 $1avla ,Carlc, Prlnclnal' P~ner CAS£ ItO. Plat Plan Ito. 10717, Rev. £.A. ao. 3441~ Plannln~ Coff~tton No. 3 t. L~D USE: ~ral Lfg~t Industrial b. ~: ~e ~ro3ec~ ls ~t~tn the n~l~ t~co~oraCed ~(ty of Ta~cula SITE: M-SC b. AOJACENT: ~SC, R-R, and C-P-S ~ USE/AREA a. S1~: ~lcant b, A03ACEK: hsJness park, ~rehouses. and vacant pascals H~ ISSUES: LJ~fact~on vtll ~ mitigated th~uoh Planntn~ Conditions of A~vil. RK~NDATION: Mtt~ ~ ~1 ~ttve Miantt~ fo~ ~.A. So. ~il and ~ Plot Pith ~uil7. by. il, Plinmtng ~tt~ ~o. t 3 in, baild on FINDINGS ANO CONCLUSIONS: The project ts consistent wt~h the G,noral Plan. ~ p~ect ~ the ~t~nts of Ordt~n~s ~e p~ict ~s c~sttt~C ~th ~e zontng on the parcel 1Ka~ and m~ ~i divelo~t ttandafds ~ the zone. any1 ~nmtil off whlch t~ I$ PLANNING BZRECTOR'S HEAR~NG DATEI 1/22/90 RIVERSZO[ COWl? PLMNZNG DEPMT11ffXT CINIDZTIMI$ OF APPNOVAL HimsoPera,. lesson Architects, Znc 390S I-6 Cadtllac Avenue Cos~l 14esa~ C~ 92826 FLOT PLAN NO. 10717, I~v. No 1. Klinering CgrNCTlgn NO. 3 PrKlecC Description: ExpinSlon ~ A DlaTrlbLrClOn #arellOUSe Assessor's PitTel NO,: 910.. Area: Rancho California The use hereby pirmltcicl by Chls ploC plan !s fo~ in expanslm ~ a dlst~l!~JttOfi warehouse frm 100,024 quire foot co 116,753 square foo~. 2. The permittee sea11 defend, 1ndenntfy, and hold harm]ess the County Riverside, 1is agents, officers, and enplo~ees fro~ any claim, acttm, pr~lng i~tnst ~he C~nCy ~ Rlvl~tdl ~ 1eS agentS, ~ftcers, ~pl~S tO attack, set astde, votd, or annul, an appr~ai ~ gl~lde, l~s tdvtso~egenctes, appeal bMrds, o~ legislative b~ c~ce~tng ~ Plan ]~Z7,hv. ~ ~aMlng C~tt~ Ho. of Rtva~de v~1I prmptly n~tfy ~ ~mttC~ of any such c]atm, or pr~edtng aqatnst the C~nW ~Rtve~tde e~w!l~ co~reCe fully the defense. ~f ~ C~nW fatls to prmptty n~tfy the pemtttee ~ any such clatm, acttm ~ preceding ~ fatls Co co~rate fully defuse, ~he pemttt. shall n~, thetaft., ~ ~sp~stble to defend, tfid~tfy, or hold hamless the C~nty of Rtvg~tde. 3. Thts apprwsl shall be used vtthtn tvo C2) years of apm'oval date: othervise 4t shall became null and votd and c~ no effect whatsoever. ey use ts meant the beginning of substantial construction conemulated by thts approval vtthtn the tvo (2) year pertod vhtch ts thereafter diligently pursued to cmplettm. or The beginning of subs*.anttal uttllzattofi contemplated by thts epp~ovaT. 4. The daveloment of the premJses shall conform substanttally with that as shmm ~ plot plan nmrked ExItlbtt A, Planntng Ca. action Ho. ~ or as amndedbythese ccndtttona. $. Tn.tM Event the use here~ peatteed ceases operation (Z) 3~lr or more. th~s a~rwal shall beccm null and void. S. ~y cutstde 11ghttng shall be hoedad and dtmctad so as not to shtno dtrectl~ upen adjoining pPoperty or pubtic rtghts.ofoway, and shall cmaply vlthO~dtnanee No. SiS. ROT ~ I]. 10717, liar. The applicant $hell eraply with thA strut 4mproven~nt recomendAttofia ~tllnK 4n the C~n~ R~d hpir~nt trlnsmitt11 di~ 12-16-80, i c~y of vht~ t~ attached. tranmtt~l dated 11-3-~, a c~ o~ which tS Ittl~hK. Flood Frosection shall be 9rovtded tn accordance with the Riverside County F~oed C~mtro1 Otstrtct SPanmitts1 dated TZ*14-Gg, a c~ of ~tc~ ~s attached. 10. ;1re protection shall be provided tn accordance with the appropriate sec~ton of 0rdtnance' 646 and the County Fire #arden's transmittal dated ],2-13-80, a copy of which 'Is attached. The applicant shall comply with the ~ecmu~endat~ons set fort~ Jn the DeparthenS of Building and S&fet~ LAnd Use Sectton transmittal dated 12-7-6gt & copy o~vhich ts attached. 12. The applicant shall canply wtth the 0apartment crf Butldfng and SafeS7 12-S-8gt & copy of which 45 et~ached. 6redtng Sectton transmittal dated 13. ~4ek ~ a~sk~, (hletK per gt~ctor's ~ar~ng ~ 1-22-90) All landscaped areas shall be planted tn accoPaence wlth approveo landscaper trrJgatton and shadtrig plans prlor To the Issuance of occupanc~ ~e~tts, An eutcnm~lc sprinkler s~sCem shall be 1naTalled and all lingscaped ar~as shalt be maintained Ina viable §rOKh canalSIon. Hinting wlthtn ten (Z0) ~Nt of in entr~ Or exl~ drlvawa~ shall no~ be permitted tO gro~ h!gher than thtrt~ (30) 1riches. Prior Co the IssUance of gliding or Imlldlng peelS, seven (7) cootes of a Parktrig) Landscaping, Zrrtgltlon, and ShadingPlans shall be su.lxnttted to the Plannlng Department for approval. The lociStrut nmber, genus, spaCles~ and container size of the plants shall be shmm. Plans shall mee~ all requlrments o1' 0rdlnance NO. 346~ 5act:IOn, 18.~2, and shall be accmplnled b~ a illleg fee as set fetch tn Section ~8,37 of Ordinance #o. 348. A total Of 143 pirklng spagee shall be provtded tn accordance with Sectton 18.12, RlvarsldeCoueW0rdlnance NO. 348. All pa~ktng spaces shell be prowldad as shmm mt the Apln'oved £xhtbtt A, Planntng Correction N& 3. The parktng ar~a shall be surfaced wtth aspbaltic GentroSe paYJog tO I mlntenm depth of 3 tnches on 4 inches of Class t! base. 18. A total of te~ (10) handicapped parktrig spaces shall be ~rovtded as shcun on £xhtbtt A, Planntng ¢onpletton #o. Z. Each ~tno s~ace ~so~ed ~ stgn CmSt~C~ ~ p~tlatn m steel, m~ text or e~l, displaying than 70 square Inches tn area and sha]l be centered at the tnter4o~ end of the parking s~ace at t mtntmum hetght of 80 taches f~m the bette of the Of 36 taches frm the parktag space ftntahed grade, ground, or $Idevlik. A staff shill also be posted tn a COnSpiCUOUS place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not 1es$ than 17 ~nches by 22 ~nche$ 4n size with lettering not less than 1 Inch tn height, ~htch clearly and conspiteously states the following; "Unluthordzed yahtoles not displaying distinguishing placards or 11cease plates Issued ~or physically handicapped persons may be tMd or b~ telephoning ." In addition to the above requIrments, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface Identification sign duptIcatlng the s~nbo1 of A mtntmum o~ seven (7) ~oadtng spaces $hall be provided 4n accordance w~th Sectton 18.13, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 19. Prior ~o the Issuance of a butldIn9 permit, the applicant shall ~Ca4n cleanante &nd/o~ pemtts ¢rm the ¢011o~ng agenotes~ guildtag & Safety - Land Use and Grading Road Oapermont R~versIde County EnvIremental Health Fire Departmat (~Wnded per O~rector's hardee on I-2~-90) 20. HrItten evidence of canp14ance shall he presented to the Land Use elyleigh of the Oepartamnt of 9utldIng and Safe%y, Building elevat4orm end ~1oor plan she11 be tn subsscarleT conformance with thlt shorn on Exhdbtts O end C. 21, Hatertale used tn the canstructton of ell buildings sM11 be tn subsSaetia! conformance wtth that shown on [xhtbtt #-1(¢01or Elevations) and Exhtbtt tq-I (~tertels Board). These are U follm~l: ~ ~ I10. 10717, 22. 23. 24. 2S. 26. 27. .Hater1 a 1 I:ol ~r I. Door and w~ndow 2. Accent strtp $l. Ttlt-u~ ~all $b. Ttlt-uD well ~4~ Hberglass co~ ~6'Xl0' ~lrh~d door 6. 22'x~4' M~ead doo~ Roof-mounted equtment shall be shtelded frm ground vtew. nqtlrtal shall be subject to Planntng Department approve!. ~creenJng Two (2) trash enclosures ~htch are ad~uata to en¢Ic~e a total o~ two (2) htn$ shall be centrally located within the poodoct, and shall be ¢eest~ucted peter to the tssuance of occullfiC¥ permitS. Each enclosure shall be stx feet in height and shat1 be painted eft the ttle-up wall to match with the main buildings and an opaque gate wi~h a self-lat;htng device whfch screens the bins frc~ external view. (~nended per Hearing on Landscape screening shall be destgned to be opaque up to a mantmm. height of s~x (6) feet atmtuetty. All street lights and other outdoor lighting abel1 be sham electrical plans subettteci to the Department c~ Bufldtn9 and Safety ~or plan chick Ipprevll and shall cmpl¥ with the requirements of Riverside Count~ Ordinance No. 66E and the Rtversdde County Ccmprehenstye General Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading pemats, the applicant shall ¢mpl~ ~lth Lrdtnance Np. ~3 b~ paying the fee required b~ the~ ordinance whtch ts led on ehe gross aoreage of the parcels proposed f~' dovelament. .Shm!d Ordinance No. 663 be superseded b~ the proclaims of a Hobfeet ~ofialrvltt.on Plan OIHOr tot he payment of the feel requtred by O~linence No. 665t the &pplfcant shall I)4~Y the fee ~quJred undlr the HlbltaC Conservation Plan as tmplenented'b~ County ordinance or resolutlm. Sfx (E) Class 12 bic~cte racks shall be provtded tn convenient locations to facilitate btcycle access to the prelect area. Peter to the issuance of butldtn9 pemlts, performrice sleurltles, tn amounts to be det~mtned by the Director of Bufldlng and safety to guarantee the tnstalletlm of plantings, walls~ and ~ences tn accordance with the approved plan, and lCIiClUIti mincehence o~ tht plan~lfi9 for ~eer, shall be ~tled ~lth the Deparment of Bulldine and Safe~y. 29. Prdor to the oceupanc~ pemSC$, all ~4u4r~l landscape plan~an9 and have 4ns:iliad and be in I ¢ondttto~ acceptable to the gutldtng and Slfe~y. The plants s~11 be healthy a,4 ~ of and 4n good wo~king order. 30. Ali ertl!ties, except electrical 14nee rated 33kV or grea~er, shall be 31. to the ~ssuince of butld~ng pampas, ~he applicant shall pr~tde e ~t~ end appr~al, (~nded per Planning Ot~torJ~ hear4ng ~ Z-Z2-gO) 32. 1~4or to any use allowed by this Plot Plan, the applicant shall Obl~tn clearance ~t the ~afiince No. 3~, 33. All o~ the ~oregoJng conditions shall be conplted with prior :o occugancy o~ an~ use illmad b:y this permit. 1/16/9o~3/oe/eo to ~ho condie/ohs o~ Prior to ~nance of a bu/ldlnq potato or any us. allowed 'no coac to any govecnnent agencyt Coatmr 12t~e i~nee adequate of Fd 21361 pe/d 6-10-88 /n the amount 8/~lr toot wide e. on~e sJ. clmmlk. 8ha/l be cmmr=~uc"..nd al~m~ 0County Contee Oc:L~ .Ca a(:~o:rdam:e v:L'ch Coun~ S*,.anda~ Ho: 0 and 40]. (~0cb s~.deva~L~)u a~,~v.~ci by 'r. ha Road 6 D~I/naqe ~onr..-o! shall be as per Ocd/M~e 4~0, Section 11,1, 60'd P1o~ ~14m 1073,7 4, XO. clAs~ume of 35 fee~ moeoun~ fun ~e o~ cm:b. fees ace cie'f'ez:z'ed co Ld'i:jv TI: lit lit!: COUNTY I~VP NO,~, 3 PLOT PLAN t0717, i~'VI~D NO. ! PJ~n 10727. P~VISI~NO. ~ and has no ObJec~ont. lever Lnd viter le~Vtaem &re tvtaXtbXe in ~his itel. Prior ifld~cttinq ~hit ~hm p~ooec~ his been GAolred ~or~ a., 3~ KohoreekA, ~ardove HatersaLe Branch EI EI]VE NOV 8 ~89 ~it ~ 'c~ RIVE;!~SlCII:' COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Rive,side County C PI nntngOe~rment oun~yAck!tntstrettve Center Riverside, California have revtlwd this case and have the fellcuing c~mints: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse porttons of the pl~laerty the project 1s considered frie from ordinary storm flood hizi~, ~ver, a stem of unusual ma~Jtude could cause la d~age. New const~c- tt~ should c~1~ wtth all applicable o~dtnin~s. ~ top~raphy of the area consists of ~11 doftn~ rtdgel and natural wa~er- tourIls ~lch traverse the pr~rty. Thi~ ~s ~quatl a~a eutstde of the ~lt~r~l uati~uese~ foe building sites. ~ nituell watercourses should be K~C ~e or outldtngs and obstructions tn o~ee to matneatn the na~ura~ deatnage pa:te~s of thl i~ii i~ to p~event ~d d~i to m buildings. A note should be placed on an environmetal constraint sheet startog, 'All ne~ buildlegs shall be floodproofed by elevating the ftntshed floors I atetime of 18 tnche~ above ~acent ground surface. Eroston p~tect~on shall be provided for~btle h~ supports." Thts prgject ts tn the , Area dratnage plan fees shall be paid tn accordance wlth the appit'cao]a rules and regulations. The proposed zoning ts consistent wtth extsttng flood hazaKIs, Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the tlll)!tld density. The Ot~t~tct's report dated ~-/I/-0C~ it stt11 current for this The Olstrtct does not obdoct to the proposid mtno~ change. ThlI pro~e~t ts a part of · ThI pro~ect w411 be free of eKItnar~ ItOrm flood hazard whin Improvements have been constructed tn aeCol~lante kith epp/Ived plans. -- The attached comments apply. [..,~ .................. K~qlql~rH ~t. EOWARO~ 4#lBIP ?l.Ifl~_.. RIVERSIDE; COUNTY !q. OOD CONTROl- AND WATE'R ~.ON$ffRVATION DUr!'RICT Pla~ntng Oepe~tmfit County Admn~strmttve Center Attention.- Pmg4anml Tam No. have revIeved thts case and have the following cmments: -..- Except for nutse~e nature local runoff ~hich may traverse porttons of the property the project ts considered free from ordtnary stom flood hazaro. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause sam damage. New construc- tion should comply vlth &11 applicable ordinances. The topography of the arma enns~sts of ~ell deftned rtdges and natural ~atar- courses ~h~ch traverse the property. There ts adequate area outstde of the natural v~terccurses for building sites. The naturaT votercourses should be kept frae of buildings and obstructions tn order to matetarn the natural dratnage patterns of the aroa and to prevent flood damage to nw buildings. A note should be placed on an environmetal constraint sheet startog, #All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elsvoting the ftntshod floors a mtnt~um of ]6 taches above adjacent ~rouM surface. Eroston protect!on shall bm p~vtded This project 4s tn the . Are~ dratnage plan fees shall be paid tn accordance vlth the applicable rules and regulatIohs. The proposed zootog ts consistent wtth extsting flood hazards. Some flood control Fattittles or floodproofing may be ~equtred co fully dovelop to the · The Otstelct's report dated II st411 cur~mt for thts project. ...- ,The District does not object to the proposed mtnor change. The attached camefits apply. ¥Ory truly yours, KOINETH L. £DNARD$ ~tef. Eng'IneeP , ~ i~nIer Civil Engineer DAT£: _.$'i. 1% t_R f n~d~ ~IO~ c~rol fa~il~tAus wi~An ~ ~eae in~a~m are pa~i~a~l~ C=~lem~ v~re an ~ea O~inage Plan has be~ a~~. Zn ~ate ~e d~~ i~aoc8 ~=~hC a~ ~ in=reas~ ~no~, ~ DA~A~ ~e~,i_~ds ~aC ~dACAo~I a~ ~%Ao ~me ~aae. be r~Ar~ Co pay m o~e. Nl~iga~Aon cha~a, w~ro app~p=ia~ A £1.cad nlt.,tqaCJ. on ch&rcja eha%l bm pai~,. Tim by ~he area o~ new developmenU. T~e nay ~evelop~enc An case Arteludes a total oC /..~( mores. AC elm c~mnc ~ee re~e of $ ?~. per n,~, khe m&CiqaCion c~a~a equal. $ ;a~ The c~m in payable Co A~ea DraAnaqe Plan ~ee or niCigakAon ~'mr~e ham already Keen cradit;.ad ~.o thin p~Nmpc~t:~, no mew chaL~gm needs Co Me palgr. m.'.J, qac:Lon caanje RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DF. PARTIdENT 2.?.-13-89 JOBX CllZIJ g~tb roepete to the Rendtalent of approvaJ. resetdins the above refere~sd plot plan, the F~re Department ceasemeeds the eel/aeOns fire protection nudeurea be pr~J~l~d An aeeordonme with t~vers~de County OrdLnaJteee and/of reasonizod ~Ozd~nanco 5~6. 4, for a 3 hour dureC~on et 20 PS! residual ope~tt~n6 proneere. which eeoc be available before eny conbusC~bXe~t.r~al Lo pieced on the ~ob site. eyetel (6"x4"x2ix2i), viii be Xocecad mac lama then 2~ £eec or note than 163 feet free any portlos of the butld~n$ as measured slamS epproTad ~7 IdJlcenC hydrant(8) ~n the nywcem. AppllCaut/devLLopsr shall furfrith OUt copy of the eater eyetea p~an. the r~c. Depart-nit ~or review. Plane eha~! tourore to the ~Ire hydrant tTpes, ~otat~ou and spacing. and, the system oha~ Beet t~. fire requireaunts. Plans sha~l be ·Lsned/approv.d by · resZoo&re6 c~vLL ens~n. er end the Loe&L water coupany utah the f~LXou~n$ cercXf~catxou: "£ that the defile of the water eyeten is :In accordance v~th the requirements proout,bed by the ~vsrside County Fire DepartBent." The reqttxed fire flowrio7 be adjusted at · later poZRc ~:t the portia pzo~eee ~o reflect ch~n10e in deeiSm. coneruction type, area separation or bud. Lc-t~f~re proteuc~onmaaureso 4 ~uataJ~a couplore fire tpr~k~er eyetom ~ a~ buf-~l~J~Se requ~r~n~ a deperMC e~oeCAou ~XX be located co the ~rouc. ~ S0 f~c ~f a h~roz. a~ a ~um of ~ for ~ the bu~ld~i(e). A o~tcmn~ ~L~d on the eL~ ~o oi the bu~ p~. Sub3acc: e submitted Co c~e F~e Department for approv·~ p~or Co ~uoca~ac~, as req~ by c~e O~o~ Bu~d~ns mast appear on C~e C~Clc pqe o! the buildinS p~an~. ~. ¢erc&tudealsnaced areas v~ be requ/red to be BainCalmed am £tra lanes. Znsc~11 portab2s f~re exclnsu~chera #~th a ,.~nt~ . rac~n$ of 2A-IOBC, Gestalt · csrt~£~cd ezcinsu~shcr company for prope~ pieceaerie uf equipment. responsebAs to eubm~e a check or money order ~n the meo~nc of $3~5.00 to the ~tVeZa~de County Fire Department fez p~an chock fees. Fr~oF to the ~ssun;c of bu~din$ pere~ts, the developer ehLL~ deposit vtth t~e ~/vers~de County F~re DepartBent, a ~hsck or money order equi~n~ the sun of 2~C per square foot as ~LC~saC~on for f~s protection Lapacts. This ~aount net be submitted sepa~aceAy from the p~an check review fee. 1~. ~he f~raflov calculated is based on buildins bales Type IlI/H Censermotion. SuILdLu6 end $·fct~ O~f~ca. AI~ questions reaardin$ the meanins of conditions sha~ be rs·arced co the BAYHOHDH. R~GXS Chief F~re Dcparmenc Plinuar By DecemOcr 7, lg89 Adminiatrltivo Center · 1777 Ariaurn Avenue Rlver~cle, CA O~.S07 RiverslOe County Plannln90epartment A~tentlon: Oo~n Chtu County Administrative center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 9ZS01 RE: Plot plan 10717, Revlsed tl Ladtes ~n~ ;ent]emen: The Land Use Otviston of the Department of Butldtng anO Safe~y has the fotlow~ng comments and conatttons: An addftlona1 plot ptan or an approved exhJb4t for on-stte stgnage w111 be required. Prtor ,~ the tssuance of butldtng permtts, ~r~tte~ clearance ~s requtred from the following: * Temecula Untfted School DtstrJct ]f approved elevations are reaut~ed from the Planning Department ~he approved plans must be submitted to ~he Land Use D~viston concurrently wtth submittal of structural ~lans for raytex. Prtor ~o acceptance of structural plans for Butldtng and Safety revtew, one complete set of aDdroved conditions from Planntng Department must be attached. Prtor to ?ssuance of but~dtng permtts, propDsed l~ghttng must be tn cDnformence ~tth Hount per OrdJnance Performance Securtt4es Bond ~or ma4ntenance Of landscaping may be requ4red. Consult your Cond4ttons of Approval. Very truly yours, . Sea4or Land Use Teohnt~an /In MmlniltrltJon (714} ~4840 · (714) 787.~20 Prior to oaame~oin4 ~AF ~.ad~ in exoess o~ 50 curio the a!~lAoaat ahall obtain a i~ad~ ~e~mAt aad a~prova~ to ~OIStZ.A~t f.~mm the ~ildJJa~ and Prior to Asm~aoe of any bGildi~K pennib, the l:z.opez~y ovaez. I~all obtain a ~adin~ pez~Lt and air.oval to construct the B~AldLuE &ndG4fety Depam*:nent. Provide veri~icatAmn that any existin~ iradinG was peem~ttsd &ud thlt approval to ooGatruot m obtained fr~m the Bu£1din~ and GafetF Dep~tmen~. Plant and irrifato fill slopes f~eaCer thaa or ~ :o S' ~or out l~8 ~ea~r t~ or e~ ~ 5' in ~fCical heart wi~ ~e or ~ ~r. S~s thaC e~e~ 15' ~ ~r oe~ o~~e 4 T. ~ f~ ~4-47. see fE~m ~4-47. ~ be ~o~d wA~Ja ~1~ hAlc!A=~ ~md DATE: October Butldtng and gife~y - Land Use Surveyor - Kin Tetch Hell~h - Rllp~ LuCh$ Flood ¢on~ol F~lh & · U.S. Postal Servtce- Ruth E. ~avddson U,S. F~ah & #~ldl4¢e ~ounC~ Super~fitenden~ of Sc~i~ Eas~m Hunc~pat ~a~r Sou~erfi C&~orn~ G~s ~al~ Trans t8 TeMcula Unton School Els~nor.e Untofi ~tgh ~vk Tu~r Co~unt ~ P1 aris -PLanninG DEPAqCiTIEfi PLOT PLAN 107~7, REVZSED NO. ~ - (Tm-5) - E.A. 3441Z - Htmes-Fe~e~oHason Archt~ec~$t Xnc. t DA~ell ~ason - Rlncn~ California Area - ~rsc ~upervlsorlAl Dtstrlcc - On ~lnchescer ~d. ~ of los 6.81~ ~r~$ - R[qUEST: Expansion ~f gxls~ng a~s~Du~on ~A~e~ouse Ho~ 119 - A.P. 910,-110-03~ Please ~evle~ t~e cut descrlbe¢ tDove, along ~tt~ the ~tlc~ea cese map. ~ Lane D1v1sloa Connlttee meettag has ~een tentatively scnedule~ for fiovemoe~ 1§, ~989. ~f ~C c~eArs,;l: w111 t~an go co pu=~lc hearlag. Your cmmmnts &fid ~tcommind&tlons ire requested prto~ to Noveml~er ~, ~989 In order t~ac ~hould ~ou nave a~ ~escions ~a~d~ng C~ls IC~, p~ease do not hesitate Co con~ac~ ,John Chiu at ~7-~363. , 0ATE:: :~/~~ SIGNATURE PLEASE ~tnt him end title 4080 LIIdON ITRIIFr, O~. ;I,00R ~P88 9~9 L 44-gOg OAli8 $TRGI~, ROOU 304 iillPIl#~ /~d~l I~I/I~IIbIIA hP~41t~q i.._3FORD PR©PER'I',~ 1~0, 3 INV1/IONMINTAL AlI!I~IMINT PORII: ~TANOARD EV&LJ. IATION · . ~CTIOI~, T~O~I~H_. IP. RANGE DF.~IFTION 1,,,~t/_...iJA ~,dl~£fmlMelailbJc#imerCeuntylr, autt 't~...L~.. AmmNelaedrlg. il.ll.$.lLILll 7.Z.,~(. ~Y4y~gkilole(UJ, OJ~SoiJ 1L.J~. Ak'Qu&lttyknpemlrromF'Voii~ IIEIOUR(~EI ~.J~ BedroW l,i~; %. (F~. VL4S) ~ YL3~ · ~ · ~AAi · ViA) DMIMtimm for ~ Ua4 lultability end Note4 &ooeptibllty R~tmllm E~' ' cr /.. t:'EIG 9)-,9 i D ,', Mind Ule ?. 9a.J~Y c)F IDO4.JCt~B A,FF'ItC~'i/,IG PRC)IK)8~ O. If mdl ~ mmn M t~ mmu#~ mm i ~ "~ not ONignmmml M OMn ~lmmDdm", w4 i ~ m · ~ Ptmm~, co"note~, (p_:~mW'M I, ~, 8, e end ?. C, ompme (Wi...'~'~n~ 4, ~, 8 IMI T I/it tml ~ · ODme,.m#y Ptmf~. I, LEYI ume G'ygmnry(lee) ~m~y'y k) lUlNgOd the f,a~J~llK~/ W ,Am) royatom land prol0om (x)mpmJbim Mth ixii~g and r,,,,.._~wuf mun'oiJrKJ~ expW~: , II ml. ,.~ .inc, ~- .I.,lll Ill addifil1/nilvim dill W il'W Ig IJ'~'a I wtte(:l. 8tire W mnlgltlon meiweL if tOMtIiIMe wNl'tOut fwqulrlng in .-~....,-.., ' t4. II I~..~i~gntl1 Ink)frei'Port Ii ri, qulr.~ ~ the m ~,~,o,,..~tr',,ia, i -,-ilia., ~11t Gin ~ V. INPOIIMA110N IOl,II~81~ ~ OP PACll' ~ MrrlOA,110N IIl~(~ntL~u~) r-I Tit4 ~ idll i!ilX five li ~ elk!c1 on t~ ~d~M.,.._ d and · ~1,._ '_.~- ~'._~fi .il~r~ may be ~111gOle~ OI)oiCI ~ · llOI,Ntll~tqt (ifflCt Off N iA~.k%,t'..K I~¥1~,11'. there will not I~ I gii'i~nt lflll:l in .MI ~ ~ Ihe ,,,.'t~OK~ meamum~ cleecmO~ m 8eDIIo~ V ~ b,ea ~a)#ed to the ~ ~ ~ ~ hlnd~ I eke'Illin- d dieJOt O~ th~ w..~d~'~e:~l ~ am I,'~A~.,., ~#d IffNM~t I~el~n ~B8 9&9 ~T~ ~ 00~-03 AB~ U30H3N~ ~:~T 066T/~T/~O PLAnnincs. DEPAqClnEriC: IK/I:i Narch 12.1990 PLA#UZ~G CCRR£CT~ON NO. 3 IbMNwII~I ~. _344f' Memo ~et!e~Me4 pletpl&m ImkJeet b the aetniNd' · ~mbJeet to the RIWJIIK C0111T/PLdUmIm OEP&qIIqE~ ~oseph A.. Rtcl~n~s, Planning o~rec~r APN: g10-110-q46-4 (TI4171N181 Slavta ;Car4~,' P~'tnc"]nal' Planner · ,% 110KX MJIIOMIA III01 CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT AB# MTG DEPT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map 24038 CITY ATTY CITY MGR Recommendation That the City Council SET FOR PUBLIC HEAR I NG Tentative Parcel Map 2~038 for the May 22, 1990 agenda, in accordance with the provisions of City Ordinance No. 13-89. Discussion Staff has concerns regarding the following issues: A request to subdivide ~.99 acres into three Parcel zoned C-P-S. The existing single Parcel currently contains an operating motel facility. The project is generally located west of the 1-15, east of Mercedes Street and southerly of Moreno Road. 1. Currently there is no tentative or approved Plot Plan to warrant a parcelization. 2. The proposed lot line separating Parcels 1 and 2, is at the bottom of a substantial slope. In circumstances such as this staff recommends that lot lines be placed at the top of slope. 3. In the future a problem may arise in regards to access on Parcel 3. As proposed, the width of the existing easement is not adequate to provide proper width for landscaping and paving. ~. Prior to approval, staff recommends that a reciprocal access agreement be drafted to provide such access between Parcels 1 and 2. Fiscal Impact Not determined. Fees to be Collected County Ordinance 633 - $12,500.00 for traffic signal impacts. Zoning Area: Temecula First Supervisorial District E.A. Number: 34277 PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 Planning Commission: 02-07-90 Agenda item No.4-1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 1. Applicant: 2. Engineer/Rep.: 3. Type of Request: 4. Location: 5. Existing Zoning: 6. Surrounding Zoning: 7. Site Characteristics: 8. Area Characteristics: e 10. 11. 12. 13. Comprehensive General Plan Designation: Land Division Data: Agency Recommendations: Letters: Sphere of Influence: Motel 6 Operating L.P. Massarc & Welsh Subdivision of 4.99 acres into three commercial lots with a minimum lot size of .73 acres. The site is located northerly of Mercedes St., easterly of Moreno Rd., and southwesterly of Interstate #15. C-P-S C-i/C-P, R-3, Interstate #15 The site currently supports an existing, operating, Motel 6, and an existing vacant building. The area is a combination of commercial and residential uses adjacent to Interstate #15. Southwest Area Community Plan Land Use: "C" (Commercial) Category II, Open Space/Cons: Areas not Designated as Open Space. Total Acreage: 4.99 Total Lots: 3 See letters dated: Road: 11-16-89 Health: 11-09-89 Flood: 11-14-89 Fire: 11-29-89 Bldg. & Safety- Land Use: 12-06-89 Grading: 11-16-89 Opposing/Supporting: None Within the City of Temecula. ~N&T.YRTS: Tentative Parcel Map No.24038 is an application to divide 4.99 acres into three commercial lots, 2.73 acres, 1.53 acres and 0.73 acres in the Temecula area. The site is located northerly of Mercedes St., easterly of Moreno Rd., and southwesterly of Interstate #15. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 Staff Report Land use and 7. onln~ The site currently supports an existing, operating, Motel 6, and an existing vacant building. Surrounding land uses are primarily commercial/retail, and residential. This site is also within the newly incorporated City of Temecula. Surrounding zoning includes Interstate %15 to the north and east, R-3 to the south, and C-1/C-P to the west. Riv~rside Co~ntv C~-l~r~hsnsive General plan: The site is located within the Southwest Area Community Plan and its land use designation is commercial. The project is a Category II land use which requires a full range of public services including water distribution, sewage collection, an adequate circulation system and utilities including natural gas and/or electricity and telephone service. The project is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan and is therefore consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan. ~..vi tonmental /~s~-s.~msnt: The initial study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 34277 has indicated impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat. The site is also located within a potential Liquefaction Zone. All environmental concerns can be mitigated through the conditions of approval. FTN~TN~S: 1. The applicant proposes to divide .78 acres into two commercial lots, .45 acres and .33 acres in the Temecula area. 2. The site currently supports an existing, operating, Motel 6, and an existing vacant building. Surrounding land uses are primarily commercial/retail, and residential. The site is zoned C-l/C-P, surrounding zoning is Interstate #15, R-3, and C-1/C-P. 3. The site is within the Southwest Area Community Plan, and is also within the newly incorporated City of Temecula. 4. Environmental concerns include impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo Rat. The site is also located within a zone of potential liquefaction. CONCT~TONR: 1. The project is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan, and therefore consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan and Ordinance No. 460. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 Staff Report 2. The project is compatible with area Development. 3. All environmental concerns have been mitigated. B~CO~.N~AT?ONS: ~nOPT?ON of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 34277 based on the findings that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and · PPROV~?. of TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.24038 based on the findings and conclusions $ncorporated in the staff report and subject to the attached conditions of approval. JSA: 1/24/90 3 PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL DATE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 24038 The following conditions of approval are for PM 24038 Amd.#l. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24038, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Board of Supervisors approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act. Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance 460. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the county Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Riverside County Surveyor. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the parcel map boundary to a County maintained road. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 Conditions of Approval o 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be submitted to the County Department of Building and Saftey. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recomendations outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated 11-16-89, a copy of which is attached. The ~ubdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated 11-09-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County District's letter dated 11-14-89, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside county Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner prior to recordation of the final map or waiver of parcel map. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated 11-29-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated 12-06-89, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated 11-16-89, a copyof which is attached. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provision of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County Ordinance or resolution. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 Conditions of Approval 17. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Road Department Riverside County Flood Control Environmental Health Fire Department Building & Safety - Grading Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety. 18. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the C-P-S zone. 19. All existing trees on the subject property with a trunk diameter greater than four (4) inches shall be preserved. Removal shall be at the discretion of the Planning Director. 20. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure soduim lamps that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal r lane passing through the luminare, and be in accordance with dinance No. 6~5. (Amended per Planning Commission on 2/07/90) JSA: kcb revised 8-04-89 OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR November 16, 1989 P.O. BOX ~ CAI..D*C~IA 92502 (714) 787..~5~4 Riverside County Planning Co~ssion 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 PM 24038 - Amend #1 Schedule E - Team 5 - $MD #9 AP #111-111-111-9 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q' s, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Comissioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream pro.per~tes from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i, e. concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/or bF securing a drainage easement. All drainage euemen~s shall be shown on the final map and no~ed as follows~ "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are all.wed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. 0 The lan~divider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing on~o or ~-ough the site. In the event the Road Commissioner pezmits ~he use of s~e~s for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of 0z~inan~e No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the s~reet capacity or the use of s~reet8 be prohibi~ed for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. ~ ADMINZSTRAT!'~ ~ · 4080 LIGON ~ * RIVZRSIDL CALIFORNIA 92501 PH 2,4038 - Amend #1 November 16, 1989 Page 2 e ® 0 ® 10. 11. 12. Major drainage is involved on this project and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. Roreno Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 32 feet frc~ centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; r~construction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Co~issioner within a 44 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 102. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improve~ents does not imply acceptance for main- tenance by County. The developer/owner shall submit a detailed soils investi- gation report addressing the construction require~ents within the road right of way. Asphalttc emulsion (fog sea1) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing a~ shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard %114 of Ordinance 461. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalks). All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street ~&ov~...ent plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the !t~venide County Road Depar~nt, a cash sum of $2,500.00 per gross acre as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer to defer time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into with the County deferring said Payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. PH 24038 - Amend #1 November 16, 1989 Page 3 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. :20. Electrical and comunications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. Lot access shall be restricted on Moreno Road with the exception of the two driveways as shown on PP 9838 and so noted on the final map. The street design and h0prove~ent concept of this project shall be coordinated with PP 9838. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file, after receiving tentative approval, for an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a 'Lighting Assessment District' in accordance with Governmental Code Section §6000. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. A striping plan is required for Moreno Road. The removal of the existing.striping shall be the responsibility of applicant. Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs horne by the applicant. The applicant shall provide CC&R's to insure access to all parcels. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall comply with Road Department standards and require approval b~ the Road Cn~4~sioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district/maintenance agreement or similar ~echanismas approved by the Road Cc~missloner. Landscape plans shall be submitted on StAndArd County Plan sheet format (24 ' x 36' ). LaPpiscape p~ans shall be subo~tted with the street imp&orient plans shall depict ~ such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are to be placedwithin the public road rights-of-way. PH 2'4038 - Amend #1 · November 16, 1989 Page 4 21. EB = Jw Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in ~he benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. Very truly yours, Subdivision Engineer County of Riverside TO: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: November 9, 1989 A~ Je~Adam, ~ NMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST IV RE: PARCEL MAP 2&038, AMENDED NO. 1 Environmental Health Services has reviewed Amended No. 1 dated November 3, 1989. Our current comments will remain as seated in our letter dated September 25, 1989. SM:tac #or 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY laI. AI~NtI~3 DEPARTMENT GEN. FORM 4, ¢Rev. 8/87) 'COUNTY oF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT ' , / J.GALLAGHE!~,II.O.,ILPJ. $5?5 II~H~TRE[T M~ {POST OFFICE ~X I$~01 · RIVERSIDE, ¢. 92~0Z ~NM,~LL. ES.N.."I.~ September 25, 1909 ~l~t,r:~. -, "--'"" "~ I~* I~ 4oo0 ~e~on S[ree[ Jg~l 2 3 ~99~ ~,,~c,~ ~iverside, CA 92502 RIVEFI61DE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANMlldO 0SS RAMSEY STREET ANNINS. CA S2220 N BROADWAY b,~ ....CA S222& .ASA mLAllCA 240 MARGUERITA ~¥ERSIDE, CA S2804 SOUTH BUENA VISTA ORONA. CA e1720 80 NORTH STATE ST, ,EMET, CA 12343 NOlO 6-209 OASIS STREET 'dOIO, CA 112201 lICE ELIIlIOIE 01SS FRASER AKE ELSINORE, GA. 'ALM INitOil 2S$ TAHOUI TZqdcGALLUM AiM SPRINGS. CA S!'SS~[' 37 NORTH '0° STP, fET S20 LINDEN STREET lIVERSIDE, ¢A, S2S07 IIlIIDOUS IS8 MISSION BLVD. ~: PARCEL MAP 24030: See attached leuaI description. (3 Lot) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 24038 and recommends that: A water system shall be 2natalled accordina to plans and specification as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate. with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals ZOO feet, alonq with the oriqina! drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pips diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint $pecifications.J~and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code. California Administrative Code. Title 22. Chapter 16. and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. when applicable. Reply to: Riverside County Planning Dept. Page Two ATTN: Mike McCabe September 25, 19~9 The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "l certify that the design of the water system in Parcel Map 24038 is accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water service. storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such parcel map. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such parcel map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose".This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The R~ans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review at least two weeks Rrior to the request for the recordation of the This Department has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providin9 satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement~rom the Eastern Municipal Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate. along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a port'ion of the sewage plans and profiles. ~i~i~ C0U~¥ Planning Page Three ATTN: Mike McCabe September 25, 1989 The plans shall be signed by a registered enuineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Parcel Map 24035 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adeguate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed parcel map." The plans must be submitted to the Coun~t Surveyor's Office to review at lea~t two weeks ,prior to the request for the recordation of the final maD. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map. Sincerely. in~',"~~nmental Health Specialist IV Environmental Health Services SM:tac Attachment KENNETH L. EDWARDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE, CAIJFORNIA 82502 lgg$ MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 1033 TELEPHONE (714) 787-2015 FAX NO. (714) 788-9965 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. Planner/~/~ '~"~ Area: Re: We have reviewed this case and have the following comments: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." This project is in the J~rY/~ (~/~~~/~ ~P. Area drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordanbe with the applicable rules and regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. The Otstrtct's report dated is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. This project is a part of free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements I~aveThb~enpr°ject will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. The attached comments apply. JOHN H. KASHUBA Senior Civil Engineer PLANNING & ENGINEERING 46-209 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405 INDIO, CA 92201 (619) 342.8886 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION GLEN I- NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF 11-29-89 TO: ATTN: PLANNING DEPARTHENT JEFF ADAHS RfVERSIDE COUNTY PLAHNII a DEP PARCEL NAP 24038 - ANENDED tl With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: Upgrade fire hydrants on the corner of Hercedes Street and 6th Street, and fire hydrant in cul-de-sac on 6th Street to a super fire hydrant (6x4x2ix2½). All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYNOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Kurt ~antwell, Fire Safety Specialist Administrative Center * 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 December 6, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department Attention: Jeff Adams County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Parcel Map 24038, Amended #1 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348. Fireplaces may encroach l' into required minimum 5' side yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5' side yard setback. t~n~arestrUly yours, Senior Land Use Technician /sn Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT GRADING SECTION (P~rNING / J.A.] HOWARD MILLS November 16, 1989 LDC Parcel Map 24038 AMD 91 NOV ? ]989 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site. The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends approval of this project if the following conditions are included. Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' and/or cut slopes greater than or equal to 5' in vertical height with grass or gound cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical height are to be provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see form 284- 47. Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance security to be posted with the Building and Safety Department. NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information from Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86, and 284-46. Thank you. E iDE counc . PL nninG DEi) :IcmEn API~LICA TION FOR LAND UiE AND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. " D TEMFORARY USE PERMrr NO;. : -. APPUCANT INFORMATION Notel 6 Olmritiag ~t= - (Jolm Beene) 1. AINMimnrl N~me: T~NG: ( ~1~ ~ ~' ~I ~ ~l~: ~tel 6 ~ti~ ~ - (~o~ ~ene) T~N~: ( 2~q ) ~-~ (8&~-6~) Wlt~~: I~ N..ate~ Ave. ~te B. ~ECT IN~Rm~ON 1. P~ ot A~st (~fiM p~): (O~i~n~ W ~t. no.) Mote~ 6 ~cu~e8 ~e~ No. I ~ lee m~ved ~ot ~ Ho. ~ - ~/I/~ C. PROPERTY INFORMATION 6. Thom~ Brothera PIp Nil.lind GOMIJinl~N: ~ No 12~. ~zM/zmtea Russell D. H~11er. 3r. HOTEL 60PER~TINfi L.P. 4080 LEMON STREET, g?" FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 02501-3657 (714) 787-6181 Russell D. Htller, Or. ItOTEL 6 OPERATI;JG L.P. Vtce President, Development 46~209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORN~ ~2201 (619) ~42-B277 REQUIRED PROPERTY OWNERR NOTIFICATION INFORMATION PAJK:EL MAPS ZONE CHANGES CoNDmc)NAL ~ PERMITS PU~3C U~E PERId~TS WIND ENERGY GONVERSION $YSTEId PLOT PLANS ReQukh~ End~onm4htll Allelements (Idu##iffdly .COmmef~ll. VARt&NCES 'I~MPOP~RY USE PERIrifTS TI~ Iolowial #imi wI t)i mQM~t m t~e time ol liltrig ol tM ibovi aoll III iPOiCmiO~l: 1. TWO ~emk:~ ~ t~ be rolened ~ eepemte e~" x l~W'm~ Ws.TW ~ ~11 ~e t~ M~ ~-i. ,JM ~J e. ~ WD Om~ ~EI ~LY :~ IW' x 11'W M~ Wt~ ~. 'The aOove hotel ifilofmltm may t~ oOtainecI Oy co~actin~ · title ifi~Jflnc4 CompBny in the Riv~sicle Coomy nrta. PROPER TY 0 WNER~ CER TIFICA ?'ION NAME: Tn'L E I REGISTRATION: ADDRESS: M40NE: ~AGNATU!~£: DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBER: '~/"/ PROJECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(a):_ NAME OF PERSON(a) PREPARING E.A.: ~_ J. I. PROJECT INFORMATION STANDARD EVALUATION ouLE .UMBF..(s): DESCRIPTION (include p~ minimum lot ~ze and ~ as apl~iceble): ~~/l~=i~t~ B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(a): D. EXISTING ZONING: ~- IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? E. PROPOSED ZqNING: ~-~-~'~ IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? ¥/~. F. STREET REFERENCES: h~"~~-L4,1 ~ I"lp'l~,'~/ J~;!~-~'-/'[.x~_L..T O1" Go SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BRIEF OE,~,RIPTION OF THE ExitrING ENVIRONMENTAL ,~'I"rlNG OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS: II. ¢CY~.r.r. HEN~IVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN 8PACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION Check the al~,ol~iate option(a) below ancl i~ooeed accordingly. [] All or part of the project lite is in "Adopted Spacific Plans," "REMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community Policy Ames". Complete Sections III, N (B and C only), V and Vl. ~ All or part of the project site is in "Areas Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV (A, B and D only), V and VI. [] NI or part of the project Nte has an Open Space and ~tlon designation other than those mentioned above. ~e Sections III, IV (A, B, and E only), V and Vl. 295-70 (New 12/87) 1 A. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD~ AND RE~OURCF.~ A~F..~,~ENT Indicate the n~ture of the propoM~ ~ u~e as ¢3t~. mined from the de~cription~ as found in Con~or~ General Plan Figure VL3 (Circle One). This information is neceM~'y to determine the ~ol~olx~ N,- Indtcltl wtlh i yN (~ or no (N) W Iny ewtrc~met~J hlzlrd Ind/or Itioun~ ii~ nl~y lignifi~lnlJy Iffect ~ ~ ifilted by the proix)elL AJI ref~-~'tcmd figraN ire centlined in the Co,,¢,4hmnlh)l General ~ For ~ny ~ ntlrked yes (Y) wTite Iddltionll ~ ~wce6, Iganc~11 cermulted, findingl of fact ~KI Iny ,,dlkWlion mseIwas under 8eclk~ V. Nl¢), where indicatecL gitale the Ipproprilte land uas 8uitlbility or ~ l=o~ility rating(8). M dB&dlU~ at boftom of thi~ ploe). HAZARDS Aiquist-PHolo Special Studws or County Fault Hazard Zones (Fig. V1.1) NA PS U R (Fig. VL3) ~AUefa~ PotentiaJ Zone (Fig. V1.1) C-L. ~ U R (F~. ~.4) PS U R (Fig. VI.5) Siop~ (Rev. Co. 800 SceJe Slope Maps) Landslide Ri~k Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Seismic ~os or On-site Irm)ection) NA ~S/] PS U R (Fi0. Vl.6) Rockfall'Hazard (On-aite Inspection) Expansive Soils (U.$.D.A. Soil Conservation Sewice Soil Surveys) Erosion (U.$.D.~. Soil Conservation Service Soil Surveys) Wind Emosion & Blowsend (Fig. VI.1, Oral. 460, Sec. 14.2 & OnJ. 484) Dam Inundation Area (Fig. VI.?) RNA°°dpI"n~' Vl'7) R (Fig. Vl.8) 27. ~ In (x Nser in Agricultural Pr~ (Rev. Co. Agdculturai Lind Converlltion 28Y' Contract Mips) W11dlifa (Fig. Vt.36 - Vt.3?) 12. ~ Al~mrt Noise (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11 & V1.12 & 1984 AICUZ RMxxt, M.~.F.B.) 13. ~ 14.._~_.. _j~_._ NA A B C D (Fig, Vl.11) 15. ~ Noise 16..~._ NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11) Project Generat~.t Noise Affecting 17..~... 18. rG 19. ~ 20. t~l 21. t~ 22. ~ 23. I~ 24. 25. RESOURCES 34. N NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11) Railroad Noise (Fig. V1.13 - V1.16) NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11) Highway Noias (Fig. V1.17 - Vl.29) Noise SMmitive Uass (Fig. VI.11 ) Nolas 8ariaafire Project (Fig. VIA 1 ) Air Quality Impacts From Project Project SMtaitive to Air Quaiity Water Quality Iml~cts From Project Project ~ to Water Quality Hazardou~ MateriaJ8 and Wastes I-lazarclou~ Fire Area (Fig. Vl.30 - Vl.31 ) Other 37. S(~mic Highways (Fig. VL45) Hiltoric Reeo~ (Fig. VL32 - VL33) ArOhleo10gicB~ Rseource$ Pl~ontol~gioai Rseoumes (F '~ont~l=g~lt Rasourc~ IVlap) Definitions for land U~e Suitability end Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - Not ADDlicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provi~ionaily Suitable U - Generally Ur~ullable R - R~tricl~d A - Generally Acceptable B - Conditionally ACteDfable C - Generally Unecceptable D - Land UM Di~:x)umged 395-70 IN~w 12/~7t · 1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(s): 3. SUBAREA, IF ANY: · 4. COMMUNITY POMCY AREA, IF ANY: 5. COMMUNITY PLAN, IFANY: ~T'r'/4c~J~-~ ~ ~__--.~V'l~*,.)/~!'~-l ~ 6. COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IFANY: ('"f~YUW~('/--~.~"~- 7. SUMMARY OF POUCIES AFFECTING PROPOSAL: So For all projects, inidcate wilh a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilitie~ and/or sewices issues may $ignificanfiy affect o~ be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are co~tained in the Comprehensive Gem~ral Plan. For any issue marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies cormulted, findings of fact, and mitigaticm measures under Section V. PUBLIC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES Circulation (Fig. IV.l-IV.11. Discuss in Sec. V ExiMing, Planned & Required Rolls) Bike Trails (Fig. IV.12 - IV.13) water (Agency Lettam) Sewer CAgeroy L ettam) Fire Sewitem (Fig. IV.16 - N.18) Shedff Servim~ (Fig rvJ?. schm~ (Fig. rv.~?. ~ wrote (Fig. fV.~? - N.~8) Padre arm necmak:m (Fig. rV.~ 9- rV.20) 17. Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV.19 - IV.24/ Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Maps) Utilities (Fig. IV.25 - IV.26) Libraries (Fig. rV.~7 - N.~e) Health Sef~ (Fig. IV. 17 - IV.18) Akpor~ (Fig. ,J8.2 - ,J 8.4, ,.1e.8. iiJe. los IV.27 - N.36) Other Ce If oH or part of the project ie located in "Adopted 8pectfic Plans", "FIEMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community Policy Am~", review in detail the m:~cific policies applying to the I~)poMI, md complete the following: 1. State the relevant land uae designation(e): 2. Baeed on thb initial study, k the ~ot..oee! (x:x'm~tent with the policies and designations of the appropriate document. and Ihr. refore ~t with the Com~ General Plan? ff not, explain: IV. LAND USE DETERMINATION (continued) D. If all or part of the project site is in "Areas not Designated Is Open Space", and is not in a Community Plan, complete questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in a Community Plan. 1. Land use category(iss) necessaW to support the proposed project. Also indicate land use type (i.e. residential commercial, etc.) d'~'T]=,P~'~t' ~ £~b~4i~~ 3. If D.1 differs from D.2, will the difference be ,x,r..olvod at ~ cK~alor..,,cnt stage? Explain: 4. Community Plan o~ssignation(s): ~.~._-~.<~vl_.. 5. Is the proposed project consistent with the policies and designations of the Community Plan? If not, explain: iv'~zr-~· 6. I$ the proposal compatible with existing and proposed surrounding land uses? If not, explain: ~--~- 7. Billed on this initial study, is the propoeM Consistant with the CompreM!nsive General Plan? If not, reference by Section and Issue Number thole issues identifying incon~l~noies: "~7~ E. If all or pad of the project site is in an Open Space and Conssn~tion cle~ignation, complete the following: 1. Slate the de~gnatton(s): 3. Based on this initial ~tucly, is ltm propcNsal conaisant with the Comprehensive ~ Plan? If not, ~ by Section and Issue Number thom issues identifying inconsistencies: 2~5-70 (N~w 12/9~) V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEA~URE$ A. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL A,_q,.ed:rSSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: DATE DATE ADEQUACY SECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION DETE!:114~ ISSUE NO. REQUIRED FIEQUESTED RECEIVED (YES/NOJ:)ATE) B. For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B encl N.B, identify the Section end i~ue number and do the following, in the format as shown below: 1. List all additional relevant data sources, including agerK;lee consulted. 2. State all findings of fact regarding environmental concerns. 3. State specific mitigation measures, if k:lentifiable without requiring an environmental imDact report (E.I.R.) 4. If additional information is required before the environmental eaea~sment can be completed, refer to Subsection A. 5. if edcl'dional sheets are needed to complete this section, check the box at the end of the section and attach the necessary sheets. SECTION/ ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES: 295-70 ~ 12/87) V. INFORMATION SOURCE8, FINDING8 OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (oontinuecl) 8~C"rlON/ 18~JE NO. 8OUNCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, M~TION MEA,~JRE$: VI. ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT OETERIMNATION: I~ The project will not have a significant effect on the environment ancI a Negative Declaration may be (or) r"l The I:)roje~ could have a IlgnifiGant effect on the environment;, however. there will not be a significant etfect in thi~ case beGaule the mitigatlon mealures de;~'il~.d in Section V have been applied to the project and a Negative Declaration may be I)ml:~KI. (or) [] The project my have a 8igniflcant effect on the onvironrnant and an EfivirOnlTlelltal Impact Report i8 required. pllpar by 2/87) SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM: The Planning Department SUBMITTAL DATE: SUBJECT: Notice of Decision of Tentative Parcel Maps acted on by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1990. RECOMMENDED MOTION: RECEIVE AND FILE the Notice of Decision for the following tentative parcel maps acted on by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1990. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 - Motel 6 Operating LP - First Supervisorial District - Temecula Area - 4.99 Acres - 3 Lots - Schedule E - C-P-S Zone: ADOPTED the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 34277 and APPROVED the tentative map. The decision of the Planning Commission is considered final and no action by the Board of Supervisors is required unless, within 10 days after the Notice of Decision appears on the Board's agenda, the applicant or an interested person files an appeal accompanied by the fee set forth in Ordinance No. 460, unless the Board orders the mater set for public hearing before the appropriate appeal board. Joseph AJ Richards, Plah~ning Director JAR:JA:sc 3/16/90 FORM 11-A (12/82) Prev. Agn. ref. Depts. Comments Dist. AGENDA NO. SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TE)4ECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 SUBMITTAL DATE: 3/29/90 RECOMMENDED MOTION: RECEIVE AND FILE the Notice of Decision for the following tentative parcel maps acted on by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1990. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24038 - Motel 6 Operating LP - First Supervisorial District - Temecula Area - 4.99 Acres - 3 Lots - Schedule E - C-P-S Zone: ADOPTED the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 34277 and APPROVED the tentative map. The decision of the Planning Commission is considered final and no action by the Board of Supervisors is required unless, within 10 days, after the Notice of Decision appears on the Board's agenda, the applicant or an interested person files an appeal accompanied by the fee set forth in Ordinance No. 460, unless the Board orders the matter set for public hearing before the appropriate appeal board. PROJECT LOCATION: The site is located northerly of Mercedes Street, easterly of Moreno Road, and southwesterly of Interstate 15. BACKGROUND: Land Use and Zoning The site currently supports an existing, operating, Motel 6, and an existing vacant building. Surrounding land uses are primarily commercial/retail, and residential. This site is also within the newly incorporated City of Temecula. Surrounding zoning includes Interstate 15 to the north and east, R-3 to the south, and C-1/C-P to the west. Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan: The site is located within the Southwest Area Community Plan and its land use designation is commercial. The project is a Category II land use which requires a full range of public services including water distribution, sewage collection, an adequate circulation system and utilities including natural gas and/or electricity and telephone service. Environmental Assessment: The initial study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 34277 has indicated impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat. The site is also located within a potential Liquefaction Zone. All environmental concerns can be mitigated through the conditions of approval. JA:gs RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 7, 1990 Mr. MacHott advised that the zoning is currently R-R, which would allow the parcels being created by the parcel map. Commissioner Donahoe said if the applicants were to go ahead, that they could end up with conditions that they could not meet, and would have no further opportunity for a public hearing. Mr. MacHott added that staff does not know what will be required until the report is in. Staff may be able to separate the change of zone from the map in order to allow the map to go ahead and be acted on by the Board. Mr. Rider said that in speaking with the geotechnical people, they suggested that they could recommend that some regrading be done on the site and compacting of soils to specifications; or, removing all buildings and completely reworking the site. The homes on the site are modular and can be moved. Commissioner Turner said that he felt that the concerns regarding the results of the tests were too great to go ahead with the map. Mr. MacHott said that the applicant would want to continue with the zone change, as they want to raise goats on the site which would not be allowed under the R-R zone, but would be allowed in the A-1 zone. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Donahoe, the Commission continued Change of Zone 5400 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 24240, Amended No. 1 to March 21, 1990 at 10:00 a.m. (AGENDA ITE~I 4-1 - Tape 2A) PARCEL HAP NO. 24038 - EA 34277 - Motel 6 Operating LP (John Beene) - Temecula Area - First Supervisorial District - west of 1-15, northerly of Mercedes St - 3 lots - 4.gg± acres - Schedule E Hearing was opened at 11:16 a.m. and was closed at 11:21 a.m. a~nd STAFF RECOM~NDATION: Adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 34277 approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 24038 based on the findings and conclusions listed in the staff report. The applicant proposes to divide 4.99 acres into three commercial lots, with a minimum lot size of 0.73 acre. The site is located northerly of Mercedes Street, easterly of Moreno Road and southwesterly of Interstate 15. The site currently supports an existing, operating Motel $ and is zoned C-P-S. Surrounding zoning is C-1/C-P and R-3. Surrounding land uses are a combination of cam~ercial and residential uses. The proposal is located within the City of Tomecula and within the Southwest Area Cemaunity Plan, which designates the site as Coammrcial. All enviromaentel concerns have been mitigated to a level of nonsignificance through the proposed conditions of approval. Staff made the following additional findings: There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied by the City of Temecula, or which will be studied within a reasonable time by the City of Temecula. 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 7, 1990 6. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the City of Temecula's future adopted General Plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan. 7. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. Staff also amended Condition No. 20 by adding to the end of that condition, '...and be in accordance with Ordinance 655." TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT: Paul Welsh (1572 N. Waterman Avenue, San Bernardino), engineer for the project, concurred with the recommendations of staff, including today's amendments. The hearing was closed at 11:21 a.m. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant proposes to divide 0.78 acre into two commercial lots, 0.45 acre and 0.33 acre, in the Temecula area; the site currently supports an existing, operating Motel 6, and an existing vacant building; surrounding land uses are primarily c~mnercial/retail and residential; the site is zoned C-l/C-P; surrounding zoning is R-3 and C-l/C-P; the site is within the Southwest Area Community Plan and is also within the newly incorporated City of Temecula; environmental concerns include impacts to the Stephens Kangaroo Rat; the site is also located within a zone of potential liquefaction; there is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied by the City of Temecula, or which will be studied within a reasonable time by the City of Temecula; there is little or no probability O~ substantial detriment to or interference with the City of Temecula's future adopted General Plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan; and, the project complies with all other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances. The project is consistent with the Southwest Area Co,tnunity Plan, and therefore is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan and Ordinance No. 460; the , project is compatible with area development; and, all environmental concern~ have been mitigated. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Com, tssioner Bonahoe, and unanimously carried, the Commission reco,mnended to the City of Tomecula adoption of the Negative Declaration for EA 34277 and approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 24038 subject to the conditions of approval as amended this date and based on the above listed findings and conclusions. (AGENDA ITEM 4-2 -Tmpe 2A, 2B) COMDITIOI~ USE PERMIT 3025 - EA 33818 - James E. Mullins - Glen Avon Area - Second Supervtsortal Dtstrtct- 1.47, acres, southeast corner of Vernon Ave mnd Hwy 60 - PR~ECT: To establish a Kennel and cartcry Hearing was opened at 11:22 a.m. and was closed at 12:09 p.m. 19 AS# MTG DEPT CITY OF TEMECULA STAFF REPORT TITLE:Conditiona! Use Permit 3036 DEPT HD. '/~ CITY ATTY CITY MGR Recommendation That the City Council RECEIVE AND FILE Cup 3036, subject to the added conditions of approval. Discussion The proposal is to replace an existing Chevron station with a new Chevron facility to include a mini-mart, The project is located at the northeast corner of Rancho CalifoPnia Road and Front Street. Staff Concerns Staff recommends the following additional conditions of approval: 1. Separate toilet facilities be provided for men and women. 2. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles. The sidewalk width on the south and east property lines shall be reduced from 12 feet to 6 six feet, and the adjacent planter width shall be increased to include the additional six feet. Fiscal Impact Not determined. Summary The site and proposed use are consistent with surrounding land uses and zoning designations. Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this project with the added conditions of approval, Fees to be Collected $3,550.00 toward traffic impacts. City Manager Comments Suggest this be set for hearing to access impact on traffic. Mini-Mart will increase traffic. ~ ¢ALIFO~IA TE Zoning Area: Rancho California Supervisorial District: First E.A. Number: 33805 Regional Team No. Five CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3036 ~ ~ 1, PLANNING CORRECTION ~1 Planning Con~nission: 2-7-90 Continued from 12-20-89 Agenda Item No. 3-3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT 2. 3. 4. 5. Applicant: Engineer/Rep: Type of Request: Locati on: Existing Zoning: 6. Surrounding Zoning: 7. Site Characteristics: 8. Area Characteristics: 9. C~prehensive General Plan Designation: 10. 11. Land Division Data: Agency Recommendations: 12. Letters: 13. Sphere of Influence: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Murphy Architects To replace existing service station with new service station North of Rancho California Road and east of Front Street C-1/C-P M-M, C- 1/C-P The site currently supports a Chevron Station All commercially developed properties Land Use: Category II Open Space/Cons: Areas not Designated Total Acreage: .75 Total Lots: 1 See Letter Dated: Road: 8-10-89 Health: 8-14-89 F1 ood: 9-05-89 Fire: 8-16-89 Bldg. & Safety: Grading: 10-10-89 Land Use: 8-07-89 County Geologist: 5-31-89 Opposing/Supporting: None as of this writing Not within a city sphere ANAI. YSIS: Project Descri pti on: Conditional Use Permit No. 3036, Amended No. 1, Planning Correction No. 1, is an application to replace an existing Chevron Station with a new Chevron facility to include a mini mart in the Rancho California Area. The site is located north of Rancho California Road and east of Front Street. CONDITIOIIAL USE PERHIT NO. 3036 ANENDED NO. 1, PLANNING CORRECTION NO. 1 Staff Report Page 2 Land Use and Zoning: The site currently supports a Chevron Service Station. Surrounding land uses include vacant land to the north a small shopping center and the 1-15 freeway to the east, a 76 union service station to the south and a watercourse to the west across front street. The site is zoned C-1/C-P. Surrounding zoning is M-M to the north and C-1/C-P to the east, south and west. General Plan: The project lies within the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area. The review of the policies of the land use element in the Comprehensive General Plan indicates that the proposed project fits the requirements of Category II land uses at this time. Category II land use should located within existing communities or within cities' sphere of influence, provide for a full range of public facilities and services including an adequate circulation system. The proposed project is consistent with the above policies, and therefore is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan. Additionally, the proposed Southwest Area Community Plan Land Use Maps designates the sites as C (Commercial} and therefore is consistent with the proposed ccmmunity plan. Environmental Assessment: The initial study conducted for Environmental Assessment No. 33805 indicated liquefaction hazard and impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat. County Geologic Report No. 616 was provided for this site and liquefaction was determined to be very low to non-existent. Stephens Kangaroo Rat impacts will be mitigated through the conditions of approval by adherence to Ordinance 663. FINDINGS: 1. The applicant is requesting to replace existing Chevron Station with new chevron facility and mini-mart in the Rancho California. 2. The site currently supports a Chevron Service Station. Surrounding land uses are offices to the north, the 1-15 freeway to the east, a 76 Union Service Station to the south and vacant land to the west. The site is zoned C-1/C-P. Surrounding zoning includes M-M and C-1/C-P. 3. The site is located within the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area and qualified as a Category II site. 4. Environmental concerns include liquefaction hazards and impacts Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat. to CO#DITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3036 AMENDED NO. 1, PLANNING CORRECTION NO. 1 Staff Report Page 3 e There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. (Added at Planning Commission on 2-14-90) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the General Plan. {Added at Planning Co~amission on 2-14-90) 7. The project ccmplies with all other applicable requirements of State and local ordinances. {Added at Planning Commission on 2-14-90) CONCLUSIONS: Law 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan, Ordinance 348, and the proposed Southwest Area Community Plan. 2. The proposal is compatible with area development. 3. Environmental concerns can be mitigated through the condition of approval. RECOMMENDATIONS: ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 33805 based on the findings that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and, APPROVAL of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #0. 3036, AMENDED NO. 1, PLANNING CORRECTION I10. 1, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the staff report and subject to the attached conditions of approval. FURTHER PLANNING CONSIDERATION This case was continued fr~ the December 20, 1989 Planning Commission in order to all o. Staff, County Counsel, and the City Attorney, for the newly established City of Temecula, on opportunity to determine whether the County or the City of Temecula's Planning Commission should be the legal hearing body. GG:bc:sc:bam:sc 10/17/89;12/12/89;2/23/90 I CU 3036 "~/~/,1~ ~% VAC~ GRADED I LAND USE I , SHOPPINCENTE VAC ~'~'~ -- VAC · WATER COURSE '0 Use SERVICE - STATION Area TEMECULA SuD.Dist. lS'l'. Sec. II T. SS.,FLSW. A,-sessor's Bk. 921 Pg. 6 Circulation FRONT I00' UC GRADE? VAC ST. MAdOR Elamrot RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.--SECONDARY-88' Fid. Bk. Pg.56-ADate li/$0/89 Drawn BYRG./ ~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 400' ,PARK LOCATIONAL MAP NO SCALE ! CU 3036 ''33 M-SC ! / MM M J EXISTING ZONING c-~/c-P \ C-P-S R-R R-R M-SC C-l/ ~ RANchO ~ · · M SC ~ ~.,~ m F ~ O C-1/C-p C-P-S C-1/C-p SP O.4, · ~ °~" ~ "." c-~/c-. . App.BILL NEELEY/CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.~.ocxr/o,/A~. MAP Use SERVICE - STATION Area TEMECULA Sup. Dist. IST. Sec. II T.8 S,R.$W. A~-~tssor's Bk. 97.1Pg. 6 CirctJation FRONT ST. MAJOR I00' EJament RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.--SECONDARY--88' I:kl Bk. Rg.56-ADate 11/:50/89 Drawn By RG./,~'~/ RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 18 · \ RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Don Nelson/Chevron U.S.A. P.O. Box 2833 La Habra, CA 90632-2833 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3036 Amended No.1, Planning Correction #1 Project Description: Replace existing service station with new service station and mini mart Assessors Parcel No. 921-060-025 Area: Rancho Calif./Temecula 8 0 The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is to replace the existing service station with new service station and mini mart. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning CUP 3036, Amd. #1, Planning Correction #1. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A, Amd. ~1, Planning Correction #1, or as amended by these conditions. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one {1) year or more, this approval shall become null and void. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way, and shall comply with Ordinance No. 655. The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the County Road Department transmittal dated 8-10-89, a copy of which is attached. CONDITIONAJ. USE PERMIT NO. 3036 AMENDE~ NO. 1, PLANNING CORRECTION NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 2 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department transmittal dated 8-14-89, a copy of which is attached. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District transmittal dated 9-5-89, a copy of which is attached. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated 8-16-89, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the Department of Building and Safety Land 8-7-89, a copy of which is attached. recommendations set forth in the Use Section transmittal dated The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Building and Safety Grading Section transmittal dated 10-10-89, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with County Geologic Report No. 616 and with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside county Geologist transmittal dated 5-31-89, a copy of which is attached. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten {10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty {30) inches. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The applicant shall submit seven {7) copies an 18. Z2 parking, landscaping, shading and irrigation plot plan to the Planning Department and shall be' accompanied by a filing fees as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance 348. A minimum of eight (8) parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.~2, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The parking area shall be surfaced ~th aspbaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT llO. 3036 ANENDED NO. 1, PLANNING CORRECTION NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 3 17. 18. 19. A minimum of one (1) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit A, Amd. #1, Planning Correction ~1. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space f~nished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than i inch in height, which clearly and conspicuously states the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning ." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following agencies: Road Depar~ent Environmental Health Riverside County Flood Control Fire Department Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety. Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit M-1 {Materials Board and Exhibit M-2 {Colored Elevations). These are as follows: Material Color Siding Roofing Entrance Door and Frame Band - Trim Decal - Lettering Stucco Barrel Tile Anodized Aluminum Stucco New Beige Terra Cota Color Dark Grey Gy 210 Red Re-360 White and Red CONDITIONAL USE PEI~MIT NO. 3036 JLqENDEI) NO. 1, PLANNINE CORRECTION NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 4 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. One (1) trash enclosures which is adequate to enclose a total of two bins shall be located within the project, and shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and a gate which screens the bins from external view. Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and within the parking areas. All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. 25. 26. 27. 28. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Depar~ent of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. This project site is within a significant groundshaking zone. Mitigation shall be the application of the proper Uniform Building Code standards in the development of this project. All existing structures on the subject property shall conform to all the applicable requirements of Ordinance 348. This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of any building permit by the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall certify that the intended structure or' building is safe and structurally integrated. This certification shall be based upon, but not be limited to, the site specific seismic, geologic and geotechnical conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure development is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated. 29. Four Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate bicycle access to the project area. COMDITIOMA!. USE PEIGMIT NO. 3036 JI#E#DE9 riO. 1, PLANNII~ CORRECTIOll #0. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of plantings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kV or greater, shall be installed underground. Prior to the sale of any structure as shown on Exhibit A, Amd. #1, Planning Correction No. 1, a land division shall be recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and any other pertinent ordinance. Prior to any use allowed by this Plot Plan, the applicant shall obtain clearance from the Depar~ent of Building and Safety - Land Use Section that the uses found on the subject property are in conformance with Ordinance No. 348. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superceded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 10/18/89 OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR LeRoy D. Smoot ROAD (~ & COUNTY 5URV~'OR August 10, 1989 COUN'~' ADMINI.~I~TIV~ CDrFT.~ MAILEqG ADDP, Z~: P.O. BOX 1090 RJI,~R~. CAL~ORNIA 92502 (714) 787.6554 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Re: (Service Station) CU 3036 - Amend #1 Planning Correction #1 Team 5 - SMD #9 Parcel 1 of PM 6757 AP#111-111-111-9 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for referenced item, the Road Department has the r ecommendat ions: the above following Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall complete the following conditions at no cost to any government agency: No additional right of way shall be required on Rancho California Road or Front Street since adequate right of way exists. 0 Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this permit, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department the sum of $3,550.00 towards mitigating traffic impacts for signal require- ments. This amount represents 1.42 acres gross x $2,500.00 per acre = $3,550.00. Prior to issuance of a building permit or any use allowed by this permit, and prior to doing any work within the State. highway right of way, clearance and/or an encroachment permit must be obtained by the applicant from the District 08 Office of the State Department of Transportation in San Bernardino. COUNTY ADM~qlSTRAT1V~ CEN~ · 40~O LEMON S13LEXT · i~F. CAL~ 9Z501 CU 2036 - Amend #1 - Planning Correction #1 Au., st ~C, 1~9 Page 2 ' Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall construct the following at no cost to any government agency: ® e e 10. 11. 12. NO additional road improvements will be required at this time. Standard access ramps shall be constructed in accordance with Ordinance 461 where applicable. Twelve foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along Rancho California Road and around the curb return on Front Street in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalks)· Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section 11.1. All work done within County right of way shall have an encroachment permit. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the development· The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the development is within an existing assessment district. If not, the land owner shall file after receiving tentative approval, for an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in pursuant to Governmental Code Section 56000 et. seq. The applicant shall comply with the Caltrans recommend- ations as outlined in their letter dated May 9, 1989. Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. CU 2036 - Amend #1 - Planning Correction #1 Au~'JSt ).0, 1989 Pa~e 3 ' 13. The applicant shall close the existing driveway at the begin curb return on Rancho California Road by constructing full height curb and gutter and 12 foot sidewalk as approved by the Road Commissioner. LJ:jw Technical Eng. Unit Supervisor TI: IE: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DATE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. aTTN: John Chlu m Martinez. Environmental. Health Specialist IV CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3036 /'~t~"~c'/' -~"~ 08-14-89 The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Conditional Use Permit 3036 and has no ob3ections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available xn this area. Prior to any buildlno plan submittals. the followinq items will be submitted: "Will-serve" letters from the water and sewerlno aoencles. If there are to be any food establishments. three comolete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, lncludin0 a fixture schedule. a finish schedule, and a plumbln~ schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. A clearance letter from the Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Manaaement Branch (3on Mohoroskx (714) 358-5055), will be required indicating that the mro3ect has been cleared for: a. Underqround storaqe tanks. b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185) d. Waste reduction management. $M:tac cc: Jon MohoroskX. Hazardous Materials Branch RIVERSIDE COUN': Y =l.AN.~f:4C F,Z~! ......"?7 KENNETH L EDWARDS f995 MARKET ~rREE'T P.O. BOX 1033 TEt IrPHONI:' (714) 787-2015 FAX NO. (71A) 788-8985 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502 September 5, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. 1 Gloria Guzman Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Conditional Use Case No. 3036 Amended No. 1 This is a proposal to replace an existing service station with a new facility in the Rancho California area. The .75 acre site is located on the northeast corner of Front Street and Rancho California Road. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has designated this area as a flood hazard zone. New structures constructed on the prop- erty should be floodproofed to a least the adjacent floodway elevation. Following are the District's recommendations: 1. The new building should be floodproofed to the floodway elevation of 1011.2 feet. e A copy of the improvement plans and grading plans along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District for review and ap- proval prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Zully Smith of this office at 714/787-2333. c: Murphy Architects !truly yo~urA, /JOHN H..~ASHUBA enior Civil Engineer ZS:bjp U.,N r r ..~~'/ RIW. RSID£ COUNTY fIRE IN COOPERATION WTTH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION GLEN J. NEWMAN 8-16-89 Ptannins & En~in~ns 4080 L~non ~r~q, ~uiie 11L Rivmid~, O. 92501 (714) 787-6606 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: GLORIA MACIEL CUP 3036 AMENDED #1 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire hydrant (6"x4"x2½x2½) located not less than 25 ft. or more than 165 ft. from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. e The applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written certification from the water company noting the location of the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water system is capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water system currently does not exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide written certification that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. e The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. 6. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 7. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 40BC. Contact certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. RE: CUP 3036 Page 2 8. Applicant/developer shall be responsible for obtaining underground tank permits from both the County Health and Fire Departments. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00 to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees. 10. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in Building and Safety. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist ml Administrative Center * 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 0une 9, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department Attention: Gloria Maciel County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Plot Plan 11170, Exhibit A, Amended #1 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions: An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site signage will be required. Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance is required from the following: ° Temecula Valley Unified School District Prior to issuance of grading or building permit, the applicant. shall obtain all necessary permits as well as final inspection required by the Department of Building and Safety for the relo- cation or demolition of the accessory structure(s). Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed light'ing must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Performance Securities Bond for maintenance of landscaping may be required. .Consult your conditions of approval. Very truly yours, . / /sn Administration (714) 682-8840 * (714) 787-2020 on ttt~ pL, o;l~2t d,td i!_~..,_-."l z.. anu,ff'to&enf, Prior, to m~monolnf Mzy fl~sdlnf 4. ozoeao o~ 50 oub4o FAz~IA, the ~ppllo~n0 abel1 ob4~tn & f~ml~uf poz1~L~ end &FA~v~I to oomsi;mmt; from ~Jo DulldZuf and ~:[ot3F dop&rlmonl~. NOT~: F~ the f~al ~ plan. please ~ide the a~li~able information f~ Bu/ldia~ aad 8afetw De~ea~m~nt ~radin~ £~: ~84-120. 284-21. ~84-88. a~d ~84-48. Thank F~u. R Vm:R iDE count. PLAnninG DEP, RC EnC May 31, 1989 Baca Associates 1141 N. Lemon Street Anaheim, CA 92801 Attention: Mr. Albert Baca SUBJECT: Liquefaction Hazard Project: A-O646-F Plot Plan 11170 APN: 921-060-025 County Geologic Report No. 616 Temecula Area Gentlemen: We have reviewed your report entitled "Geotechnical Investigation Report, Phase 1 Liquefaction Evaluation Study, Service Station No. 1870, Temecula, CA," dated May 12, 1989. Your report determined that: The probability of liquefaction under current conditions (depth of groundwater at about 33.5 feet) is considered to be very remote to nonexistent. For an assumed "historic high" groundwater at a depth of about ten (10) feet, there is a potential for liquefaction within a layer extending between a depth of about 10.5 to 18.5 feet. The overlying moderately compact to compact zone is considered to be non-liquefiable and will block the surface manifestation of liquefaction.. 3. Proposed burrled fuel tanks are to be founded at a depth of about 14 to 15 feet and will extend into the 'liquefiable' layer. Your report recommended that: 1. Special mitigating measures for ground level construction are not considered necessary. 2. Three (3) mitigation design alternatives for the buried fuel tanks are as follows: a) Remove and recompact the existing soils to a depth of 18 feet and to a distance of about 10 feet beyond the tank group perimeter. 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 Baca Associates - 2 - May 31, 1989 b) Remove the existing soils to a depth of'18 feet and to a distance of about 10 feet beyond the tank group perimeter, then replace with imported, readily compactable 3/4 inch crushed rock or clean pea gravel. c) Employ tie-down anchors for the proposed tanks. It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner and satisfies the additional information requested under the California Environmental Quality Act review and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Final approval of the report is hereby given. The recommendations made in your report for mitigation of liquefaction potential shall be adhered to in the design and construction of this project. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~ - /~tor Roger eter Planning Di Steven A. Kupfe Engineering Geologi CEG-1205 , SAK:al c.c. Chevron U.S.A. - James Coalson Norm Lostbom - Building & Safety {2) Planning Team 5 - Gloria Maciel ~ RiVERMDE courlc.u API~LICA TION FOIl LAND UIE AND DEVELOPMENT APR 20 1989 1. ,elll~' -~rlNemo: Bill Henley IdMl~m: P.O. Box 2833 T~~: (213 ~ 6g~-7736 ~ ~o~: Che~ou U. LA. Inc. ~~: P.O. Box 2833 T~ N~: ( 213 ~~: 2750 S. Harbor B~vd,Su~ce I Sanca RIVERSIDE COUNTY /Che'vTon U.S.A. Inc.PLANNING DEPARTMENT CA 90631-2833 La Babra La Rabra CA 90631-2833 (8 &m.- S CA 9270& NOTE :ff more thee o~e Demon d invoh~Ci m the otmmlhiD Of the IXOllerty II)ei~g t~eveioaecl · Nearate D~Oe musf be I. PRC)aEGT INFORMAnON 1. Purpose 04 Request (0eecrtte IMOjoct): (OKlinlneo 348 mi. no.) ~e Ipplic~t inte~l to d~llih the niltin& facility and const~ct a aev self in.ice GAi Station vith I~ dispensers, four undersround ca~s, hey canopy and None ~ ~~ INF~ 921-06-O25 28900 lincha CL~lforu~a Uo&d (Front SiTeat) Tmc~a, ~ifo~a ~ ~ ~ T~ ~l 'L.~[IG~~: .75 (32,8A0 eq.~t.) Lolll deK tdia-~ tl~de~ct Iqsl tieIt bdl~xmmeoee~J IntheOffim cd the GouMy RoeoelM~Moy t)e ~ttoched. Parcel I of Parcel hp 6757, ou ftle ~ ~ok 21 page 73 of Parcel hpl, records of SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY CHEVRON U.$JL INC. 1201 $~.:th Beach Blvd. ' ' ~.'; v~ CA 40~O LEMON STREET. gm FLOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 82S01-3657 r')' I dl 7~.?.~1n1 4~-20g OASIS ~'11qEET. ROOM 304 INDIa, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-~277 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PANTI: Oeho~ bd~_ dUlA 1. 111MM Ii~e TMM M ~ .75A I/"Ye~-ilmWleC44e NWllbl/.AM)lllWkle N ih&,-~ !.~IJAI!ii!., 1.4 N.~er, lkmlm, e/Kll~mllll/NM~ lfeMu TMM ReOmt* u~ ilVUilebieit Ihe PU~IW.. J'tl~M'ol tho PIi~ I:)ll~ b/ifiL w to mldlmdze ~ I~lzlJ~L IWi any n~ltloItiofi W t.to N pfi)ject ~n W~ lulM~li~ ttll ipOhGo. W to cemsct ~e U& ~MI Co~ Wl~Ulb-~ ~ If your I)~Ojoct il lUedl(~ IO I)k:m)~lnd ItlZllljl, W l blOwlind ~ontrol Mlfi wltf~ tfle -~,l),:~ ~ ~ WlO M~ 14.1 I/'N~' how fir must t~e u~ter MMs) be exlefield to Im~kM eMMO07 NM d foM or Ndel PROPERTY OWNERI NOTIFIOATION INFORMATION The IbOve haM4 in,on.abort rely be aMaineel Oy e(mtlctine i tWe W eom~eny m ~e Nive~le ~ou~ ~rea. PROPERTY OWNERS (~ERTIFIOA TION ,. .~_~-._,~.~. .~,.. _. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH Fl. OOR 4080 LEFtON STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director A PUBLIC #EARZNG has been scheduled before the PLANMXNG C~MMISSIOM to consider the application(s) described below. The Planning Department has tentatively found that the proposed project(s) will have no significant environmental effect and has tentatively completed negative declaration(s). The Planning Commission will consider whether or not to adopt the negative declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing. Place of Hearing: Boar~ Rm, 14t~ Floor, ~J)~O L~ Street, Riverside, CA Date of Hearing: WEDNESDAY, The time of hearing is indicated with each application listed below. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Department before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the adoption of the negative declaration and/or approval of this project at the time of hearing. If you chmllenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Con~ission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The environmental finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter Monday through Friday from g:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3036, AMENDED NO. 1, EA 33805 is an application submitted by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for property located in the Temecula Area and First Supervtsorial District and generally described as being north of Rancho California Road, east of Front Street and made pursuant to Ordinance No. 348, Riverside County Land Use Ordinance which proposes to replace existing service station with new service station TIRE OF HEARING: 10:00 Chevron USA ~57 23~,00 Rancho Cal£f Rd 921-06-025 March 15, 1989 300~ Listing Cbsp&zgal lnv 3090 Arlotte Long Be~ch CA 90808 921-060-024 Chevron USA P 0 Box 7643 San Pganciseo CA 94120 921-060-025 Rancho Calif Dev Co P O Box 755 Temecula CA 92390 921-060-029,080-049,280-13 Union Oil Co of Calif P O Box 7600 eden Diego CA 92138 ~21-070-001 A J Fisher P O Box 1600 Rowlet TX 75088 921-070-002 Dennys P O Box 605 La Mir&ds CA 90637 921-070-017 D,~n/el Levenson 41850 !%oreno Rd Temec~l.& CA 92390 921-070-018 m=phyAn~/t~cts 2750S. Hazbc~Blvd., Su/te I SantsArs, 0% 92704 p.O. Bax 2833 La Rabra, C~ 90632-2833 ::IiVE iDE counc.u ;,L nnine DEPA:ICI11EnC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBER: .-'-~ ~ ~ 0 ~ PROJECT CA~E TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS<s):.'q~I~ ', APPUCAN S NA E: NAME OF PERSON(s)PREPARING E.A.: I. PROJECT INFORMATION STANDARD EVALUATION MODULE NUMBER(s): / / A. DESCRIPTION (include prol:~, asd minimum lot size and uses as applicable)~ / B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES ~), ~- ; or SQUARE FEET C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s): °, c-~- / - C) ~2 ~ '-'.') ~ ~ D. EXISTING ZONING: C"/ /~Z-~ E. PROPOSED Z~NING: /~/ /r~ F. STREET REFERENCES: ~q~(-~ ~ No IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR A'I'FACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS: IL COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION Chec~ t~e acqm~ate ootk~s) bMow am:f ~oc~ :~ccordin9fy. I'1 All or part of the project lite ks in "Adopted Specific Plans," "REMAP" or 'Rancho Villages Community Policy Am~". Complete Sections III, IV (B and C only), V and VL AII o~ ~ of the project ette ks in "Areas Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV (A, B Im~ D only), V and VL r-i Ni or part of the project lite hu an Open Space end CoManmt~n clMignation other than thom mentioned lb(we. Complete -~w~bon~ III, N (A, B, and E only~ V and VI. III. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AHD RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Indicate the nature of the proooMd ~ ueo 88 d&to.,,,ir~.'l from the de~:~olJon8 as foum:l in ComDrehensive General Plan Figure VI.3 (Circle One). This infonrmtJon i~ noco~m'y to clotermine the ~op~to ~ use suitability ratings in Section III.B. NA - Not Apl:)lk~ble Critical E,mentml NormafLow Ri~k Indicate wf~ a yes (Y) or no (N) whMh~' Iny environmental hlz~'d Incflor resource ~ may ~ign'~..antly affect or be affectecl by the propoMI. All referenced figures are contained in the Co,,,l:~6h~nlive Gonoml Plan. For any issue marked yes (Y) write circle I~ II=~rol:x~te land use lullability ~x noise accel~lbility riffrig(s). (See ~ at bottom of this page). HAZARDS Alquiat-Prtoio SDecial Studies or County Fault 12. ~ ~ Zones (Fig. VI.1 ) NA PS U R (Fig. VL3) Liquefaction Potential Zone (Fig. VI.1)~.~ F ~/~ 13. NA S P$ U R (Fig. VI.4) Grouncle~aking Zone (Fig VI.1) 14. _~ NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.5) Slol~s (Ray. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps) 15. ,/~ Landslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Seismic Maps or On-site InsDection) 16...~ NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6) Rockfall Hazard (On-lite In~oection) 17. Expansive Soi18 (U.S.D.A. Soil 18. ~ Conservation i Sotl Surveys) 19. Erosion (U.S.D.A. Soil Consewation 20. wind £~)K)n & B~ (~. V~.l, ~. 4~, ~ 14~ & ~. ~) ~p~ns (~. ~.~ 25. ~ ~r NA U R AirlX)rt NoMe (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11 & V!.12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.B.) NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) Railroad Noise (Fig. V1.13 - V1.16) NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11) Highway Noise (Fig. V1.17 - VI.29) NA A B C D (Fig, V!.I 1 ) Other Noise NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11) Project Generated Noise Affecting NoMe Sensitive Uses (Fig. VI.11) Noise Sensitive Prc)Mct (Fig. V1.11) Air Quality Impacts From Project Project Sensitive to Air Quality Water QuaJity Impacts From Project Project Sensitive to Water Quality 22. '~j. Hazardous MateMs end Wastes 23. Hazen~s Fire Area (Fig. Vl.30 - VI.31) ~ Hi~ (Fig. VI.45) Historic Resoumes (Fig. VI.32 - VI.33) Arc~ealogl,~u' Reeoumes · .J'ea.d ~Gic~J Re~ource~ (PllomtologJcll Resources IVl.o) Definitions for Land Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings U - Genemly Unluil~le R - Reihl~t! :1 A - Germ.~lly Aooegtable B - Conditionally Aoceptlble C - Gene'lJly Unacceptlble D - Land Use Di~couragecl 3eS-TO (New 12/17) 2 LAND U~E DETERMINATION ComiCeta this ~ unless the proiect is tocat~l in "N:lol:~d Sm, c~ Plans", "REMAP" or "Ranc~o Villages Community Policy Area~" 4. COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IF ANY: 5. COMMUNITY PLAN, IF ANY: c.'~",//; X,C ~'~d..~' 6. COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(s). IF ANY: For all projects, inidcate with a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or services issues may significantly affect or be affected by the prol~)sal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comp~e General Plan. For any issue marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section V. PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 1~._ Circulation (Fig. IV.l-IV.11. Di~cu~ in 10-/~ Sec. V Existing, Planned & Re(;uired Roacls) Bike Trails (Fig. !V. 12 - IV.13) Water (Agency Sewer (Agency Fire Servfc~_'___ (Fig. N.16 - IV. 18) Sheriff Serra=es (Fig N.I?- N.~8) Schoo~ (Fig. 9~.~. Parks and Re,.~a g!;;m (Fig. IV.19 - IV.20) 11 ' EQuestrian Trails (Fig. IV. 19 - IV.24/ Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Mal~) Ulilitlas (Fig. N.25 - N~6) I. Jbraries (Fig. IV.17 - N.18) Heetth Sewic~ (F~;. rv.~7 - fv.18) NrTx~la (Fig. IL~ 8.2 - ,48.4, IL18.8 - 11.18.10 & N.27 - N.36) reV. LAND ~ DETERMINATION (~ontMued) D. If ill m' part of the project site is in "Areas not ~rmted as Open Space", and is not in a Community Plan, complete questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete questions 4, 5, 6 and ? ff it is in a Community Plan. Current land use catogor~ies) f~ t~e site based ~n existing condJtJ~s. Also indicate land use type 3. If D.1 differs from D.2, will tte difference be resolved at lte d~slo~.r~nt ltage? Explain: 4. Community Plan designation(s): Is the proposed project consistent with the policies anti designations of the Community Plan? If not, explain: ~ IS the proposal compatible with existing and proposecl surrounding lancl uses? If not, explain: ~/J,,/ 7. Baled on this in'~ial ltuCly, IS the ~ consistent with the Comprelmnsive General Plan? If not, reference by Section and Islue Number those iMuea identifying 2. II the propoeaJ ooniimnt w#h the d~n(8)? ff not, explain: 3. ~ on this InitiaJ 8tudy, is lhe pfopoM~(x)naisent ~ the Ccxnprehensive General F)tan? If not, ,..,',storm by ~ and Isaue Nun~ thoae Jesues identifying ilXX)illilllr~cilr ~M-?o (N~w I~7) 4 V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES a. ADDmONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: DATE DATE ADEQUACY ,~Ec'rlON/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED (YES/NOJ)ATE) Be For each issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and IV.B, identify the Section and issue number and do the following, in the format as shown tinlow:. 1. List all additional relevant data sources, including agencies consulted. 2. State all findings of tact regarding environmental conrems. 3. State specific mitigation measures, if identifiable without requiring an environmental impact report (E.I.R.) 4. If additional information is regluired before the environmental as~eesment can be completed, refer to Subsection A. 5. If additional sheets are needed to complete this section, check lite box at Ihe end of the section and attach the necee~ary sheets. SECTION/ ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES: , _ V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (eontlnuecl) SECTION/ ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES: See attached i:mges. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION: will not ~ a ~ignircafit effect aq the ~~t ~ a ~ ~ nY ~ ~ ~ a ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ te~v~r, ~ ~11 ~ ~a ~~t !-1 The project may have a eigplficant effect o~ ~.vironment and an Environmental Impact ggd/AGD14913 DATE: TO: FROM: MEETINS DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT April 24, 1990 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY May 1,1990 CITY CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution and Conflict Code with the Resolution title as follows: #A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE" DISCUSSION: California Government Code Section 87300 requires all agencies, including cities, to adopt a Conflict of Interest Code. After incorporation, cities are provided six months in which to adopt a Conflict of Interest Code. This Code has been prepared pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974 as amended and meets the mandates of statute. The list of designated officials has been prepared to reflect those City officials and employees whose positions may involve decisions which could materially impact their personal financial interest. Please note that the Mayor, Members of the City Council, Planning Commissioners, the City Manager, City Attorney, and Finance Director are all required to report economic inter- ests pursuant to state law and thus are not covered by this Code. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be minimal fiscal impact to the City other than reporting and record keeping requirements. These requirements are mandated by state law. ATTACHMENTS: The Resolution adopting the Conflict Code and the draft City of Temecula's Conflict Code. ggd/RES18626(042490) RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHEREAS, The City of Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989; and, WHEREAS, it is forseeable the city officers, employees, and commission members may make decisions which could have a material impact on their personal financial interest; and, WHEREAS, the California State Fair Political Practices Commission has ruled that such material interests should be disclosed and in appropriate circumstances the effected official should abstain from voting or participating in such a decision; and, WHEREAS, "local agencies" including cities are required by Government Code Section 87300 to adopt a Conflict of Interest Code; and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the attached Conflict of Interest Code, is hereby adopted as the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Temecula. SECTION 2. of this Resolution. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this , 1990. day of RON PARKS MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the city of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1990 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS F. D. ALESHIRE CITY CLERK ggd/COI19764 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SECTION 1. Purpose. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Sections 87300, et seq., the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as "City") hereby adopts the following Conflict of Interest Code. The provisions of this Code are in addition to those contained in Title 9, Chapter 7 of the Government Code (Section 87100 et seq.). Except as otherwise indicated, the definitions contained in Title 9, Chapter 2 of the Government Code (Section 8200 e__t seq.) are incorporated herein and apply to this Code. It is the purpose of this Code to provide for the disclosure of assets and income of designated employees which may be materially affected by their official actions, and, in appropriate circumstances, to provide that designated employees should be disqualified from acting in order that conflicts of interest may be avoided. SECTION 2. Designated Positions. The positions listed in Exhibit #A# are designated positions. Officers and employees holding those positions are designated employees and are deemed to make or participate in the -1- ggd/COI19764 making of decisions which may foreseably have a material effect on a financial interest. SECTION 3. Disclosure Statements. Designated positions shall be assigned to one or more of the disclosure categories set forth in Exhibit #B#. Each designated employee or official shall file an annual statement disclosing that employee's or official's interest in investments, business positions, interests in real property and source of income designated as reportable under the category to which the employee's or official's position is assigned in Exhibit #B#. SECTION 4. Place and Time of Filing. (a) All designated employees or officials required to submit a statement of financial interests, (FPPC Form No. 730), shall file the original with the City Clerk's office. (b) The City Clerk's office shall make and retain a copy of the statement. (c) A designated employee or official required to submit an initial statement of financial interests, (FPPC Form No. 730), shall submit the statement within 30 days after the effective date of this Code, disclosing interests held including investments, business positions, and interests in real property on the effective date of this Code, and income received during the twelve (12) months prior to the effective date of this Code. -2- ggd/COI19764 (d) All persons appointed, promoted, or transferred to designated positions shall file initial statements not more than 30 days after assuming office. (e) The first statement of financial interests filed by a designated employee shall disclose the designated employee's reportable investments, business positions, and interests in real property as those investments, positions, and interests in real property exist as of the effective date of this Code or the date the designated employee assumed office, whichever is later, and income received during the preceding twelve (12) months. (f) Annual statements shall be filed by April 1, of each year by all designated employees. Such statements shall disclose reportable investments, business positions, interests in real property, and income held or received at any time during the previous calendar year or since the designated employee took office if during the calendar year. (g) A designated employee required to file a statement of financial interest with any other agency which is within the same territorial jurisdiction and whose disclosure requirements are comparable may comply with the provisions of this Code by filing a duplicate copy of the statement filed with the other agency, in lieu of an entirely separate statement. -3- ggd/COI19764 (h) Every designated employee who leaves office shall file, within 30 days of leaving office, a statement disclosing reportable investments, business positions, interests in real property, and income held or received at any time during the period between the closing date of the last statement required to be filed and the date of leaving office. (i) A designated employee who resigns his or her position within 30 days following initial appointment is not deemed to assume or leave office, provided that during the period between appointment and resignation the individual does not make, participate in making, or use the position to influence any decision of the City or receive or become entitled to receive any form of payment by virtue of being appointed to the position. SECTION 5. Contents of Disclosure Statements. Disclosure statements shall be made on forms supplied by the City Clerk's Office, (FPPC Form No. 730), and shall contain the following information: (a) Contents of Investment and Real Property Reports. When an investment or an interest in real property is required to be disclosed, the statement shall contain: (1) A statement of the nature of the investment or interest; -4- ggd/COI19764 (2) The name of the business entity in which each investment is held and a general description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged; (3) The address or other precise location of the real property; (4) A statement whether the fair market value of the investment or interest in real property equals or exceeds one thousand dollars ($1,000) but does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000), whether it exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000) but does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or whether it exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). For purposes of this Code, "interest in real property# does not include the principal residence of the designated employee or any other property which the designated employee utilizes exclusively as the employee's personal residence. (b) Contents of Personal Income Reports: When personal income* is required to be disclosed under this Code or pursuant to the Political Reform Act, the statement shall contain: (1) The name and address of each source of income aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value, or fifty dollars ($50) or more in value if the * "Income is defined in Title 9, Chapter 2 of the Government Code (Section 82030). That definition is attached hereto as Exhibit #C#. -5- ggd/COI19764 income was a gift, and a general description of the business activity, if any, of each source; (2) A statement whether the aggregate value of income from each source, or, in the case of a loan, the highest amount owed to each source, was at least two hundred fifty dollars ($250) but did not exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), whether it was in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000) but not greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or whether it was greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000); (3) A description of the consideration, if any, for which the income was received; (4) In the case of a gift, the name, address and business activity of the donor and any intermediary through which the gift was made; a description of the gift; the amount or value and the date on which the gift was received; (5) In the case of a loan, the annual interest rate and the security, if any, given for the loan. (c) Contents of Business Entity Reports. When the designated employee's pro rata share of income to a business entity, including income to a sole proprietorship, is required to be reported, the statement shall contain: (1) The name, address, and a general description of the business activity of the business entity; -6- ggd/COI19764 (2) The name of every person from whom the business entity received payments if the designated employee's pro rata share of gross receipts from such person was equal to or greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) during a calendar year; (3) Income of a business entity is required to be reported only if the direct, indirect, or beneficial interest of the designated employee and his or her spouse in the business entity aggregates a 10 percent or greater interest. In addition, for purposes of subparagraphs 2 and 3 of this subsection, the disclosure of persons who are clients or customers of a business entity is required only if it is reasonably foreseeable that the client or customer may be materially affected by the decisions of the designated employee. (d) Contents of Business Position Disclosure. When business positions are required to be reported, the designated employee shall list the name and address of each business entity in which he or she is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or in which he or she holds any position of management; a description of the business entity in which the business is engaged, and the designated employee's position with the business entity. -7- ggd/COI19764 (e) Acquisition or Disposal During a Calendar Year. If any otherwise reportable investment or interest in real property was partially or wholly acquired or disposed of during the period covered by the statement, the statement shall contain the date of acquisition or disposal. SECTION 6. Disqualification. Designated employees shall disqualify themselves from making, partici- pating in the making of, or in any way using their official position to influence a governmental decision when it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial affect distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the designated employee, or a member of his or her immediate family, or on: (a) Any business entity in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more; (b) Any real property in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more; (c) Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public -8- ggd/COI19764 without regard to official status, aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made; (d) Any business entity in which the designated employee is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management; or (e) Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by, or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. For purposes of this section, indirect investment or interest means any investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of a designated employee, by an agent on behalf of a designated employee, or by a business entity or trust in which the designated employee, the designated employee's agents, spouse, and dependent children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10 percent interest or greater. No designated employee shall be required to disqualify himself or herself with respect to any matter which could not legally be acted upon or decided without his or her participation. -9- ggd/COI19764 A designated employee required to disqualify himself or herself shall notify the City Manager and the City Clerk in writing, and the City Clerk shall record the person's disqualification. Violations Pursuant to Government Code Section 87300, this Code #shall have the force of law" and any violation of any provision of this Code shall be punishable in accordance with Government Code Sections 91000 to 91015 and include criminal and civil sanctions, as well as discipline within the City's Personnel System. -10- ggd/COI19764 SECTION 7. EXHIBIT "A# Designated City of Temecula Employees and Disclosure Categories The following positions entail the making or participation in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on financial interests: Designated Position Disclosure Categories Assistant City Manager ..................................... 1 Building Official .......................................... 1 Chief of Police ............................................ 1 City Clerk ................................................. 1 City Engineer .............................................. 1 Exempt Officials** ........................................ 0 Fire Chief ................................................. 1 Members of all City Commissions, Boards, and Committees Not Otherwise Required to File Conflict of Interest Statements ............................ 1 The Mayor, City Council, Members of the Planning Commission, City Manager, City Attorney, City Treasurer, and Director of Finance are all required to file disclosure statements pursuant to state law and thus are not included herein. A-1 ggd/COI19764 Planning Director .......................................... 1 A-2 ggd/COI19764 SECTION 8. EXHIBIT "B# Categories of Reportable Economic Interests Desiqnated Persons in Category "1# Must Report: All investments, interests in real property, income, and any business entity in which the person is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. These financial interests are reportable only if located within and subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or if the business entity is doing business or planning to do business in an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or has done business within an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City at any time during the two years prior to the filing of the statement. Designated Persons in Category "2" Must Report: (a) (b) (c) All investments in real property located within or subject to the jurisdiction of the City. Investments in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. Income from any source which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. B-1 ggd/COI19764 (d) His or her status as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holder of a position of management in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City. DesiGnated persons in Category #3# must report: (a) Investments and business positions in, and income from business entities located in, doing business in, or planning to do business in the redevelopment project area and all interests in real property located within two miles of the redevelopment project area. B-2 ggd/COI19764 EXHIBIT "C# 82030. Income. (a) #Income# means, except as provided in subdivision (b), a payment received, including but not limited to any salary, wage, advance, dividend, interest, rent, proceeds from any sale, gift, including any gift of food or beverage, loan, forgiveness or payment of indebtedness received by the filer, reimbursement for expenses, per diem, or contribution to an insurance or pension program paid by any person other than an employer, and including any community property interest in the income of a spouse. Income also includes an outstanding loan. Income of an individual also includes a pro rata share of any income of any business entity or trust in which the individual or spouse owns, directly, indirectly or beneficially, a 10-percent interest or greater. "Income," other than a gift, does not include income received from any source outside the jurisdiction and not doing business within the jurisdiction, not planning to do business within the jurisdiction, or not having done business within the jurisdiction during the two years prior to the time any statement or other action is required under this title. (b) "Income" also does not include: (1) Campaign contributions required to be reported under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 84100). (2) Salary and reimbursement for expenses or per diem received from a state, local, or federal government agency and reimbursement for travel expenses and per diem received from a bona fide educational, academic, or charitable organization. (3) Any devise or inheritance. (4) Interest, dividends, or premiums on a time or demand deposit in a financial institution, shares in a credit union or any insurance policy, payments received under any insurance policy, or any bond or other debt instrument issued by any government or government agency. (5) Dividends, interest, or any other return on a security which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or a commodity future registered with the Commodity Futures C-1 ggd/COI19764 Trading Commission of the United States Government, except proceeds from the sale of these securities and commodities futures. (6) Redemption of a mutual fund. (7) Alimony or child support payments. (8) Any loan or loans from a commercial lending institution which are made in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to official status if: (A) Used to purchase, refinance the purchase of, or for improvements to, the principal residence of filer; or (B) The balance owed does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (9) Any loan from an individual's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, uncle, aunt, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that a loan from any such person shall be considered income if the lender is acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not covered by this paragraph. (10) Any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction if made in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to official status, so long as the balance owed to the creditor does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (11) Payments received under a defined benefit pension plan qualified under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a). (12) Proceeds from the sale of securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or from the sale of commodities futures registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the United States Government if the filer sells the securities or the commodities futures on a stock or commodities exhange and does not know or have reason to know the identity of the purchaser. C-2 CITY OF TEMECULA TO: Mayor Ron Parks Councilmember Pat Birdsall Councilmember Karel Lindemans Councilmember Peg Moore Councilmember Sal Munoz FROM: Ad Hoc Law Enforcement Committee DATE: April 20, 1990 SUBJECT: Riverside County Fire Department Agreement for expanded services At your request, the Committee has reviewed the proposal from the Riverside County Fire Department and has requested the preparation of the enclosed agreement. The Committee feels this agreement provides the needed level of service and recommends your favorable action. However, if reductions are necessary due to budgetary restrictions, the Committee recommends changes in the following order: 1) 2) 3) Reduce number of Battalion Chiefs to one. Removal of The Fire Prevention Officer position. Reduce the three positions of firefighters to two. Teresa Maley, Recording Secretary RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF April 20, 1990 ~G.'TI&F,.NT of FOR -~ ." IT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENU PERRIS. CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE: {714) 657-3183 Frank Aleshire, City Manager city of Temecula P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 Dear Frank: The attached Cooperative Agreement is our standard agreement, the initial term of this agreement is for a period of three years. Because it is necessary to hire and train personnel on the truck company and the need for a stable work force, we feel that a three-year initial contract is appropriate. In addition, I am including two different staffing patterns that are possible for the city. Attachment #1 lists either a Fire Captain or Fire Apparatus Engineer on duty and two Firefighter II's for each of the two fire stations within the city (3 persons on each of the two fire engines). It also lists a truck company with four-person staffing; one Fire Captain; one Fire Apparatus Engineer, and two Firefighter II's on duty at all times. We propose that the city fund 50% of the truck staffing and the county fund the other 50%. It should be noted that we are budgeting for the county's share of the truck company staffing and no guarantee can be made that our budget request will be approved, although we feel confident it will be. The attachment also lists two Battalion Chiefs and a Fire Prevention Officer/Coordinator for a total additional expenditure of $853,957. Attachment #2 is the same as Attachment #1 for staffing of the fire engines and truck company, but it deletes one Battalion Chief and the Fire Prevention Officer/Coordinator for a total additional expenditure of $696,034. We offer the different alternatives for your review but recommend the staffing level in Attachment #1 for your growing city. Both proposals are figured on a 12-month basis. We realize that the truck company training would not start until approximately August; therefore, the actual contract billing will be somewhat less than listed. We are pleased to present these proposals to you and would hope to receive your decision in the next few weeks, at which time we will prepare the Exhibit "A", per your decision, and process the completed contract for the necessary signatures. Yours in Fire Safety, '~LEN J. NEWMAN Chief db ATTACHMENT #1 CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDED STAFFING LEVEL USING FY 90/91 DOLLARS - 3 PERSON ENGINE CO. 4 PERSON TRUCK CO. STA. #12 STA. #73 INDIRECT 1 - CAPT 5.2 COSTS 1.6 - ENG. FF II TOTAL 164,300 175,712 291,548 631,560 164,300 175,712 291,548 631,560 SUBTOTAL $1,263,121 TRUCK COMPANY (50%) 2 - BATTALION CHIEF FIRE PREVENTION CAPTAIN 3 - CAPT. 3 - ENG. 6 - FF II'S 110,208 95,850 168,201 SUBTOTAL TOTAL DOLLARS FOR RECOMMENDED STAFFING CITY OF TEMECULA TAX CREDIT NET CITY BILLING TOTAL 374,259 168,892 73,472 $ 616,623 $1,879,744 (1,025,787) 853,957 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1'7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 3OO 3535 . 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE. CAL/FORNIA A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, RESCUE, AND MEDICAL AID FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19 , by and between the County of Riverside, hereinafter called "County", and the City of Temecula, hereinafter called "City", whereby it is agreed as follows: PURPOSE The purpose of the Agreement is to arrange for the County, through its Cooperative Agreement with the State of California, to provide the City with fire protection, rescue, and medical aid services, hereinafter called fire protection services. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority granted by Government Code Sections 55603, 55603.5, 55632, 55606 and 55642, and will be mutually advantageous to the City and the County in that it will provide a unified, cooperative, integrated, and effective fire protection, rescue, and medical aid system which will satisfy the combined County/City responsibilities to protect lives, property, and natural resources from fire danger. II COUNTY IN CHARGE A. The County Fire Chief shall represent both parties during the period of this Agreement and that Officer shall, under the supervision and direction of the County Board of Supervisors, have charge of the organization described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, for the purpose of providing fire protection services as deemed necessary to satisfy the needs of both the County and of the City, except upon those lands wherein other agencies of government have responsibility for the same or similar fire protection services. B. The County will be allowed flexibility in the assignment of available personnel and equipment in order to provide the fire protection services, rescue and medical aid services as agreed upon herein. C. The City shall appoint the County Fire Chief referred to under Paragraph A. above, to be the City Fire Chief. In addition, the Chief shall have the authority and responsibility equal to that of a City Department Head for the purposes of administering City expenditures under Exhibit "A" of this Agreement. III I!1 -1- 2 4 5 6 '7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 040590 ';jf 1581it ~8 ~?VILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSFI ,~5a$ - 10TH STREET RIX~:ISIDE. CALIFORNIA III PAYMENT FOR SERVICES A. The City shall appropriate a sum of money to provide fire protection services within the area of responsibility of the City for the period from the date of execution of this Agreement t( June 30, 1991 B. The County shall make a claim to the City for the contracted services as shown on Exhibit "A" during each of the following periods: (1) July 1 through September 31, claim for 25% in October; (2) October 1 through December 31, claim for 25% in January; (3) January 1 through March 31, claim for 25% in April; and (4) April 1 through June 30, claim for 25% in June. City shall pay each claim within fifteen (15) days after receipt thereof. The County shall allow a credit to each claim in the amount of 25% of the Structural Fire Taxes as determined by the County Auditor-Controller to be collected in each Fiscal Year of this Agreement. IV HOLDING OVER A. The initial term of this Agreement shall be from July 1 1990, to June 30, 1993. The term of this Agreement shall be a one (1) year term thereafter. Either party to this Agreement may term- nate this Agreement by providing a written notice of termination t~ the other party hereto twelve (12) months prior to the expiration of the term hereof. In no event shall this Agreement be terminate( by either party prior to June 30, 1993. If no written notice of termination is received by either party, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed at the same level of service, at the then current level of expense, and otherwise on the same terms and conditions herein specified, so far as applicable until: (1) A new Agreement is fully executed, or (2) Termination of the Agreement following twelve (12) months prior written notice of termination, or (3) New Exhibit "A" is mutually agreed to by and between the parties. B. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual consent of the parties at any time after June 30, 1993. v COOPERATIVE OPERATIONS All fire protection, rescue, and medical aid work contem- plated under this Agreement shall be done by both parties to this Agreement working as one unit; therefore, personnel and equipment, regardless of whether they are included in Exhibit "A" may be -2- 1 temporarily dispatched elsewhere from time to time for mutual aid. VI MUTUAL AID When rendering mutual aid or assistance as authorized in Section 13050 and 13054, Health and Safety Code, the County may 5 demand payment of charges and seek reimbursement of City costs for personnel as funded herein, under authority given by Section 13051 6 and 13054, Health and Safety Code. The County in seeking said reimbursement will represent the City in following the procedures 7 set forth in Section 13052, Health and Safety Code. Any recovery of City costs, less collection expenses, will be credited to the 8 City. 9 VII 10 PROPERTY ACCOUNTING 11 All personal property provided by the City and by the County for the purpose of providing fire protection and rescue services 12 under the terms of this Agreement shall be marked and accounted for by the County Fire Chief in charge, in such a manner as to conform 13 to the standard operating procedure established by the County Fire Department for the segregation, care, and use of the respective 14 property of each. 15 VIII 16 LIABILITY 17 A. The County will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City from all loss, costs or expenses caused by the negligent or 18 wrongful act or omission of County officers, agents and employees occurring in the performance of this Agreement to the extent that 19 such liability is imposed on the City by the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California. B. The City will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the £1 County from all loss, costs or expenses caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of City officers, agents and employees 22 occurring in the performance of this Agreement to the extent that such liability is imposed on the County by the provisions of 23 Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California. IX 85 DELIVERY OF NOTICES Any notices to be served pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered delivered when deposited in the United States mail and addressed to: 88 VILLIAI~ C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 353~. lOTH STREFI' RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA III -3- COUNTY County Fire Chief 210 W. San Jacinto Ave. Perris, CA 92370 CITY OF T~.CUT.A City of Temecula Post Office Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390-3000 Provisions of this section do not preclude any notices heine delivered in person to the addresses shown above. 5 X 6 ENTIRE CONTRACT 7 This Agreement contains the whole contract between the 8 parties. It may be terminated at any time or any provision herein contained may be amended or modified upon the mutual written con- 9 sent of the parties hereto. 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officials of the parties hereto have, in their respective capacities, set their 11 hands as of the date first hereinabove written. 12 14 Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM CITY OF TEMECULA 15 By 16 Title 17 ATTEST: 18 19 2O 21 22 By Title ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By Chairman, Board of Supervisors 24 By 25 28 WILLIANI C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 353~ - 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA GB:jf 1581it 033090 Deputy (SEAL) -4- CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TITLE: 1-15 OVER-CROSSING TRAFFIC CONTROL RECOMMENDATION: City Council authorize staff to enter into a Contractual Agreement with All City Management Company for the purpose of providing traffic control points at the over-crossings located at Winchester Road and 1-15, and Rancho California Road and 1-15. BACKGROUND: On March 13, 1990 the City of Temecula, Traffic Advisory Committee presented a report to the Temecula City Council. The report discussed the need for Traffic Control Points at two 1-15 over-crossings that provide motorists access to either side of the City. The current traffic flow at the over-crossings contributes to grid lock during peak use hours: 6:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M.; 11:30 A.M. to 1:30 P.M.; and ~:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.; Monday through Friday. Citizens have reported delays as long as 40 minutes to travel the 1-15 over-crossings. Members of the California Highway Patrol conducted a Test Program using traffic officers directing traffic at key points at the aforementioned locations. They were able to reduce the trip time for over-crossing passage to 6 minutes during peak user times. On March 27, 1990, Resolution 90-33 was passed by the City Council. It approved $50,000 in City Funds for use with dollar- for-dollar matching funds contributed to the City for a program intended to cause a more timely traffic flow at the 1-15 over- crossings. On April 13, 1990, three private security vendors attended a Request for Proposal Conference. The purpose of meeting was to discuss the feasibility of providing a turn-key Traffic Control Program, tailored to the needs of the traffic problem at the two 1-15 over-crossings. The companies who attended the conference were selected from information obtained from other agencies, who employ private contractors for traffic services. The three who were invited to attend were: Coleman Security, All City Management Company and Excalibur Security Service. Page Two City of Temecula Agenda Report Coleman and All City Management submitted bids for the program. Both companies complied with the requirements discussed at the Request for Proposal Meetings. The following reflects the monthly cost for each company: * All City bid per month * Coleman bid per month $9,730.50 $11,859.40 Contact was made with several Southern California agencies who utilized the services of All City and Coleman. Several agencies expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with Coleman Securities. The major complaint seemed to revolve around employee/employer problems, pertaining to payment to employees for services rendered to Coleman. Agencies who employ All City Management Company provided positive feedback regarding the services that were rendered by All City Management employees. FISCAL IMPACT: Resolution 90-33 caps the fiscal impact to the City for this program at $50,000. Resolution 90-33 also requires that prior to City funds being spent, donated private funds must be used as dollar-for-dollar match money. The Traffic Safety Committee is the conduit for the solicitation of these funds. To date, Bedford Properties has indicated that they will contribute $10,000 at start-up of the program. ALTERNATIVES: Utilizing California Highway Patrol officers is feasible, however, the $25,700 monthly cost is prohibitive. Hiring City staff would be the next most efficient concept, but supervision, benefits, workers compensation costs, workers' injury claims, and other hidden costs associated with city would be costly. ATTACHMENTS: A. Traffic Committee Report. B. Coleman Security Bid. C. All City Management Bid. C'ty 1 of Temeeula TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT City Council Meeting March 13, 1990 CITY OF TEMECULA TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ROSTER E.B. ADAIR JR. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 450 W. STETSON AVE. HEMET, CA 92343 714/652-6202 SGT. RON ROBERTS CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 27685 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 714/676-0112 CHUCK vO~INS RANPAC ENGINEERING 27447 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST TEMECULA. CA 02390 714/699-$972 714/676-7000 CURT HAWKINS -- ~L HAWKINS & ROBERTSON ASSOCIATES 28481 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TEMECULA, CA 92390 714/676=2443 KNOX JOHNSON PRIVATE CITIZEN 29681 AVENIDA DEL SOL TEMECULA, CA 92390 714/676-3946 JACK LEATHERS PRIVATE CITIZEN (RETIRED CIVIL ENGINEER) 42623 REMORA ST. TEMECULA, CA 92390 714/699-9563 DAVID LOWRY DEVELOPER 27349 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SUITE 206 TEMECULA, CA 92390 RICHARD BARRERA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ROAD DEPT. 4080 LEMON STREET 7TH FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CA 92502 714/676-4131 714/275-6800 T A B L E __2)_ !'~ __([_0 N T E_.~ _T S i'KAFFi F '.5 h' .;~ V E ',.' ~,. i."af'fic 'founts B. Commuter Survey C. Statisl~ics {Bar Graph PROPOSED TRAFFIC IMPROVEME.~TS City o~ Temecula) ............. 7 CITY OF TEMEC. ULA Tg_A F F [.C_ C_O_MM[.T_T_E~ REPENT City Council Meeting SUMMARY :,eaviest ~raveiling westbound. Stop anO ~o traI i ic on W[nc~.es%er Road staffs east of Ynez [{Dad and continues r}ast *-[:3 Yreewgy overcrossing to Jefferson Avenue. .:~ ripple ef~ecl causes traffic to also back up on northbound Ynez Road from Winchester Road. Morning commute traffic on Rancho California Road appears to be equally divided. The heaviest traffic in both directions continues to be east of the freeway due mainly to the close proximity of Front Street and it's signalized intersection. Afternoon commute traffic on eastbound Winchester Road backs up from the 1-15 Freeway overcrossings to several blocks west of Jefferson Avenue. As the result of northbound traffic on Jefferson Avenue making right turns onto eastbound Winchester Road during left turn phases, near gridlock has developed on eastbound Winchester Road west of Jefferson Avenue. Vehicles entering Winchester Road from parking lots and side streets add to this congestion. Afternoon commute traffic on eastbound Rancho California Road backs up from the freeway overcrossings to west of Diaz Road. 'Traffic on north and southbound Front Street also backup for some distance due to the congestion on Rancho California Road between Front Street and the overcrossing. Traffic on Rancho California Road east of the freeway is usually free flow The intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road has little traffic congestion during commute traffic hours. for appointzp. 4 persons other ., Pr'ov':,ae t:affiz direct~:t a: the followin~ Locations ~uri:~ ;,e.ak :raff:c hours u~ilizin~ part time i'ity of "emec~_;ia employees ~.rained in traffic control. a. ;,inchester Road at s/b !-15 off-ramp. b. Winchester Road at n/b 1-15 off-ramp. c. Winchester Road at Ynez Road. d. Rancho California Road at s/b i-15 offramp. e. Rancho California Road at n/b 1-15 offramp. Roadway b~odifications 1. Winchester Road. a. Create additional westbound traffic lane on Winchester Road from Ynez Road to west of I-1~. b. Post anti-gridlock warning signs on Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue. 2. Rancho California Road. a. Lengthen left turn 1-15 freeway access lanes on Rancho California Road. Post anti-gridlock warning signs on Rancho California Road at Front Street. } I I F~ve Hours Traffic Control Five Traff;~ '~ontroi ' "f rs - _ ~ ~ ,3: ice ,.'[' $224.75 p.~r day. (Morning and afternoon shift) Five Hours Traffic Control - Two Traffic Control Officers ~ $89.90 per day. Five Hours Traffic Control - Fixre Traffic Control Officers @ S1,!23.75 per week. iMonday through Friday) Five Hours Traffic Control - Two Traffic Control Officers ~ $.~49.50 per week. (Monday through Friday) It is recommended that the City Council also consider implementing additional civilian traffic direction during the noon hours on week days (1130am-130pm). This would raise the cost estimate to 21,573.25 per week or approximately $6,300 per month of operation utilizing five Traffic Control Officers. 'n Encrcac~.menr l'?rm!+ '. {1! ~-? re,s':irem b'- Ca!Trans '~mplementaCion oI 'd~ie .d-=\-!ii~:-~ Ei'c~IIiC ,control pro,ram. committee :'ecomme:~cs that v. hi:£ :~?'ccess be started as possible. ATTACHMENT A TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT Page 6 USE OF CIVILIANS FOR LOCAL TRAFFIC CONTROL Section 21100, Subsection (e) V.C. permits local authorities to adopt rules and regulations for appointing persons other than traf'fic officers to direct traffic under the following circumstances. a. Whenever traffic control devices are disabled or otherwise inoperable. '~ b. At scenes of accidents or disasters. c. At locations requiring traffic direction for orderly movement of traffic. Section 21100 V.C. prohibits the appointment of such persons to perform traffic regulation duties unless and until: a. The local authority has approved an enabling ordinance or resolution. b. The'local authority has submitted a proposed training program for such persons to the California Highway Patrol. c. The proposed training program has been approved by the Department. Section 21100.3 V.C. makes it unlawful to disobey traffic directions given by a person appointed or authorized by a local authority to regulate traffic pursuant to Section 21100 when such person is wearing an official insignia issued by the local authority and is actin~ in the course of his appointed duties. The California Highway Patrol is not responsible for conducting the training required by Section 21100 V.C. However, assistance may be provided in the development of their individual training programs. a. Local authorities may develop their own traffic control training program. In lieu of a locally developed program, the Department's training program may be used. TRAFFIC COUNTS - SEPTEMBER 1989 - 24 HOUR COUNT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD/I~15 RAMPS: South Bound Off Ramp South Bound On Ramp North Bound Off Ramp North Bound On Ramp Total 8,880 5,770 6,600 8,670 29,920 WINCHESTER ROAD/I-15 RAMPS: £ouuh Bound Off Ramp South Bound On Ramp South Bound On Ramp North Bound Off Ramp North Bound On Ramp Total 9,120 3,0t5 2,370 4,600 9,750 28,855 WINCHESTER ROAD NORTH OF YNEZ - ALL LANES: 17,000 to 17,100 (Loop)[1] [2] Estimated Annual Growth 7% to 8% [1] [21 West Bound on Winchester Road East Bound on Winchester Road Data from Donna Crowley - Caltrans 383-4226 COMPANIES CONTACTED FOR COMMUTER SURVEY Advanced Cardiovascular Systems American Industries Banner American Products BC! General Contractors Bedford Properties Bianchi International BW/IP International Cal-West Rental Center Cal. Geo. Tex, Inc. Central Power Engineering 'Senturv 2! Coleman Homes Inc. Creative Kids Nursery School CTS Corporation Davidson Associates ECO Farms Corp. General Dynamics Financial Services Halstead Industrial Products Honda of Temecula Hudson Oxygen Therapy Sales Co. International Rectifier Ivonyk Group Services M & J Ramsey Corp. Marie Callender's Maurice Printers McDonalds Milgard Mfg., Inc. Overland'Bank Pamco/Rancon Financial Payless Northwest Pichel Industries Plant Equipment Inc. Polycraft, Inc. Press Enterprise Price Security Systems Rancho California Water District Ranpac RFL Surveying, Inc. Soil Tech, Inc. Solid State Stamping Temecula Valley Pipe & Supply US Thermo Plastics, Inc. Western Lumber TOTAL No. of Day Shift Emp. 600 100 5O 3O 25 2O0 i50 2O !7 21 !5 !6 25 23 142 28 33 450 3OO 2O 14 5O 17 140 110 5O 200 4O 30 75 15 10 7 124 175 4O 35 43 2O 25 44 3569 ~- Z w SE S33XO9~N3 JO ~!St~[HnN I Crossing guards may be given up to outside firm Guards · · · Story and photo by PETER IMAMURA The Press-Enterprise The Moreno Valley City Council tonight will consider hir- ing a private company to adminis- ter the city's sclaool crossing guard program. which has been expanding each :,'ear and taxino. the city department ~hat now oversees The council w~11 review a contract with [.os Angeles-based All City Management Company. whicl~ specializes in managing public programs. If approved, the company would h~re, tram and supervise the crossing guards, who help children safely cross streets and intersections at desig- nated locations near schools. All City Management present- (From Page B-t) and school districts in the county said that crossing guard programs in their jurisdictions are usually administered by city police de- partments or through joint ar- rangements involving a city and a school district. Programs in the unincorporated areas of the coun- ty are usually supervised through school districts. In the city of Riverside, which employs 87 crossing guards and 10 substitutes, the Riverside 'Police Department coordinates the program and provides train- ing. Riverside Police Capt. Gary Barnes, who oversees the depart- ment's Special Services Division, said that Riverside's crossing guard program is coordinated by a non-sworn department employ- ee, who works with school dis- tricts in the city to determine where-guards are needed. He said such programs should have the approval of the local law enforcement agency, sinc~e a crossing guard provides som~ limited traffic control ser- vices. In Moreno Valley, the Trans- portation Division of the city's Public Works Department pres- ently supervises the crossing guard program, which consists of 24 employees and about the same number of alternates. According to All City Man- agement's proposal for Moreno Valley, the firm plans to hire all existing crossing guards and sub- stitutes who wish to remain work- ing as guards. If the council approves the contract, the firm, which had sub- reitted a lower bid than another competing firm, would be paid $152,000 for services from July 1 to June 30, 1991. The city then would consider renewing the con- tract each fiscal year. When Moreno Valley incorpo- rated in December 1~84, the city employed only two guards. City Public Works Director Barry Mc- Clellan said the number of guards has steadily increased and has become a drain on the trans- portation department, which for the most part can spare only one ly provides crossing guard admin- istration services for a number of cities. including Huntington Park. Cudahy. Anaheim, Stanton. West- lake Village, Agoura Hills, Fuller- ton, Westminister and Vernon. The company also provides ser- vices for Ventura County. In addition. the firm had pro- :'~ded similar services for the city ,',f Los Angeles for three years. The city eventually established its own municipal bureau for cross- inl~ guards. Although other cities and counties in California have em- ployed private firms for crossing guard programs. the practice is apparently rare in Riverside County. Officials from other cities (See GUARDS, Pa~e B-2) person Ior the p,~,~, sion. More guards also will be needed as both the Moreno Valley Unified School District and the Val Verde School District begin constructing more schools and start year-round schedules in the city. Tracey Vaclmr, chairwoman of the city's Traffic Safety Com- mittee, said that problems appar- ently have arisen in the past whenever a crossing guard calls in sick at the last minute. The city often must scramble to find a replacement, or employ a police officer to temporarily serve at the guard's post until a replacement can be assigned, she said. Meanwhile, Moreno Valley school district spokesman Bill In- gram said that the district at this point did not have any concerns over the city hiring a private com- pany, as long as the crossing guard program continues to func- tion efficiently and properly. "The main thing we're inter- ested in are the results," he said. ENTEE TAINMENT BRIEF Watch for it in.. · COLEMAN SECURITY SERVICE, INC. April 16, 1990 Sgt. Rick Sayre City of Temecula City Hall 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, Ca 92390 Dear Sgt. Sayre: It was a pleasure having the opportunity to meet on April 13 to discuss the traffic control program for the city of Temecula. As I stated, Coleman Security Service has been involved in the management of municipal services since 1980. Our programs have included the management of crossing guard services and parking enforcement programs. In 1982-84 we were also contracted by the Department of Navy to provide police services for Hamilton Air Base in Novato, California. As the on-base police we handled everything from issuing speeding and parking citations to investigating a variety of misdeameanor crimes. All of our officers at this site were POST certified. Enclosed is a proposal for providing a traffic control program for the city of Temecula. In this proposal our company would be responsible for the recruitment, hiring, training, supervision and placement of all personnel. The program would involve providing traffic officers at five sites and a roving supervisor. The major concerns in developing this program are having professional, trained officers working each site and a competent field supervisor who can effectively supervise the forces working in the field and guarantee that a site is never left uncovered. We are very aware of the liability involved in this program. That is why we are so concerned with the individuals selected to participate in this program and their training. Should you have any questions or need any additional information call me_ at (213)~938-2996. C~a~les StYalter Vice-President/Chief Operation Officer Corporate · 5622 W. Pico Blvd. · Los Angeles, CA 90019 · (213) 938-2996 Orange County · 727 S. Harbor Blvd., C · Anaheim, CA 92805 · (714) 535-4372 PROPOSAL FOR CITY OF TEMECULA TRAFFIC DIRECTORS PROGRAM 1. PERSONNEL A. RECRUITMENT: PERSONNEL WOULD BE RECRUITED FROM THE IMMED- IATE AREA. WE WOULD PLACE ADVERTISEMENT IN THE LOCAL NEWS- PAPERS, AS WELL AS CONTACT THE MARINE DEPOT AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT SOURCES. THE IDEAL CANDIDATES WILL BE THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO RESIDE IN TEMECULA. THE ADVANTAGE OF THIS WOULD BE REDUCTION OF DRIVE TIME FOR THE PERSON AND FAMILI- ARITY OF THE AREA. B. PERSONNEL: THERE ARE FIVE (5) SITES THAT NEED TO BE FILLED. HOWEVER WE WOULD INITIALLY TRY TO RECRUIT 10 TO 15 PEOPLE, EXPECTING A TURNOVR OF AT LEAST 50% IN THE FIRST 90 DAYS. ALSO AT LEAST 2 TO 3 PEOPLE WOULD BE WORKING IN A RESERVE STATUS, AVAILABLE TO FILL IN SHOULD SOMEONE CALL OFF. A FIELD SUPERVISOR WOULD ALSO BE HIRED. THE SUPERVISOR WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSISTING IN THE RECRUITMENT, HIRING, TRAINING, ASSIGNMENT AND SUPERVISION OF PERSONNEL. THE FIELD SUPERVISOR WOULD SERVE AS THE COMPANY'S DAILY LIASON WITH THE CITY AND AVAILABLE TO INVESTIGATE ANY PROB- LEMS, CONCERNS OR QUESTIONS. THE MOST IMPORTANT ROLE OF THE SUPERVISOR WOULD BE TO SEE THAT EACH SITE IS COVERED. SHOULD SOMEONE CALL OFF, THE SUPERVISOR WOULD ARRANGE FOR A RESERVE OFFICER TO WORK THE SITE AND THE SUPERVISOR WOULD STAY AT THE SITE UNTIL THE RESERVE ARRIVED. EACH DAY THE SUPERVISOR WOULD VISIT EACH SITE AND WATCH THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OFFICER, TO ENSURE THERE ARE NO PROB- LEMS. THE SUPERVISOR WOULD PREPARE A DAILY ACTIVITY REPORT THAT WOULD REFLECT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SUPERVISOR FOR THE DAY. THE FIELD SUPERVISOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE TIME RECORDS ON ALL EMPLOYEES AND PREPARING THE INVOICE FOR SERVICE. 2. REQUIREMENTS A. AGE: 21 TO 65 YEARS B. EDUCATION~ HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA OR GED EQUIVILENT (WOULD PREFER PERSON WITH SOME JUNIOR COLLEGE EDUCATION) C. ABILITY TO EFFECTIVELY READ, WRITE AND SPEAK ENGLISH D. ABILITY TO BE CLEARED IN CRIMINAL BACKGROUND IN VESTI- GATION AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE TEST. E. BE ABLE TO PASS A MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF HEARING, SIGHT, COLOR DIFFERENTIATION AND ABILITY OT MOVE FREELY WITHOUT USE OF MEDICATION OR OTHER FORMS OF ASSISTANCE. F. PREVIOUS LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY OR TRAFFIC DIRECTION EXPERIENCE PREFERRED. TRAINING A. ALL PERSONNEL WILL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS OF TRAINING. PERSONNEL WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO WORK UNTIL THE TRAINING IS COMPLETED. B. TRAINING WILL FOCUS ON THE SUBJECTS OF TRAFFIC DIRECTION, REVIEW OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE, REPORT WRITING, RADIO COMMUNICATION, FIRST AID, POWERS OF ARREST, PUBLIC RELATIONS AND RESPONSE IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS. A CER- TIFICATE WILL BE ISSUED AS AN INDIVIDUAL COMPLETES THE TRAINING (COPIES WILL BE SENT TO THE CITY). C. IT IS HOPED THAT AN ARRANGEMENT CAN BE MADE WITH THE HIGHWAY PATROL TO HANDLE THE TRAINING REGARDING TRAFFIC DIRECTION. 4. COMMUNICATION e A. ALL TRAFFIC OFFICERS AND THE SUPERVISOR WOULD CARRY A HAND HELD RADIO WITH WHICH THEY COULD MAINTAIN COMMUN- ICATION BETWEEN THEMSELVES AND THE HIGHWAY PATROL. B. THE TRAFFIC SUPERVISOR WOULD ALSO HAVE A BEEPER SO HE/SHE COULD BE CONTACTED IN THE OFF-HOURS. C. THE CITY OF TEMECULA WOULD BVE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING THE RADIO EQUIPMENT. RADIOS WOULD BE CHECKED OUT AT THE BEGINNING OF A SHIFT AND RETURNED AT THE END. COLEMAN SECURITY WOULD PAY FOR ANY RADIOS THAT ARE LOST OR DAMAGED. TRANSPORTATION A. THE FIELD SUPERVISOR WOULD USE HIS/HER OWN VEHICLE AND BE -'- REIMBURSED FOR MILEAGE AND USE. B. THE FIELD SUPERVISOR WOULD HAVE A MAGNETIC SIGN ATTACHED TO HIS/HER VEHICLE WHICH INDICATES "TRAFFIC CONTROL-CITY OF TEMECULA". 6. UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT A. ALL PERSONNEL WOULD BE ISSUED: THREE(3) SHIRTS THREE(3) SLACKS ONE(i) WINDBREAKER ONE(1) ORANGE SAFETY VEST ONE ( ! ) ORANGE BALL CAP ONE ( 1 ) WHISTLE ONE(1) I.D. CARD B. ALL UNIFORM ITEMS WOULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY OUR COMPANY AND ON THE BACK OF THE SAFETY VEST AND WINDBREAKER THE NAME OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA WOULD BE PRINTED. 7. INSURANCE A. ONE OF THE GREATEST CONCERNS IN UNDERTAKING THIS PROJECT IS THE LIABILTY INVOLVED FOR BOTH THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND OUR COMPANY. THIS IS WHY THE APPLICANT SCREENING PROCESS, MEDICAL EXAMINATION, CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK AND TRAINING ARE SO IMPORTANT. ONE MISTAKE CAN COST OUR COMPANY A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF TIME AND MONEY. B. WE ARE CURRENTLY ABLE TO PROVIDE A LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 2 MILLION, NAMING THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS A CO-INSURED. C. ALL EMPLOYEES WOULD BE COVERED BY WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND THE CITY WOULD RECEIVE A CERTIFICATE VERIFYING OUR COVERAGE. 8. CLIENT RELATIONS A. A PROGRAM MANAGER REPRESNTING COLEMAN SECURITY WOULD MEET WITH THE CITY ON A MONTHLY BASIS TO DISCUSS ANY PROBLEMS, CONCERNS OR QUESTIONS. B. THE SUPERVISOR WOULD BE AVAILABLE ON A DAILY BASIS TO RE- SPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS, CONCERNS OR PROBLEMS. C. IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS THE PROGRAM MANAGER OR AMANAGE- MENT REPRESENTATIVE WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO ASSIST IN THE RESOLUTION OF ANY COMPLAINTS, PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS. 9. INVOICE FOR SERVICES A. THE CITY WOULD BE INVOICED TWICE A MONTH. B. THE INVOICE WOULD REFLECT HOURS WORKED BY THE OFFICERS AND BY THE SUPERVISOR. 10. WAGES A. ALL FULL TIME PERSONNEL WOULD BE GUARANTEED EIGHT(8) HOURS OF PAY FOR EACH DAY WORKED. THIS WOULD COMPEN- SATE INDIVIDUALS FOR THE SPLIT SHIFTS OF WORK. B. PART TIME PERSONNEL WOULD ONLY BE PAID FOR THOSE HOURS ACTUALLY WORKED. C. BOTH TRAFFIC OFFICERS AND THE TRAFFIC SUPERVISOR WOULD BE PAID ON AN HOURLY BASIS. THEIR RATES OF PAY WOULD BE: TRAFFIC OFFICER I (NEW HIRE): $8.25/HR. TRAFFIC OFFICER II (AFTER 30 DAYS OF EMPLOYMENT): $8.50/HR. (2) TRAFFIC SUPERVISOR (NEW HIRE): $9.25/HR. TRAFFIC SUPERVISOR (AFTER 30 DAYS OF EMPLOYMENT): $9.50/HR. IT IS OUR BELIEF AND EXPERIENCE THAT IN ORDER TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED PERSONNEL THE PAY IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE ABOVE THE NORMAL RATES PAID FOR SECURITY PERSONNEL IN THE AREA. THIS SHOULD REDUCE THE TURN- OVER PROBLEM AND ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THROUGH RECRUITMENT, TRAINING AND HIRING OF NEW PERSONEL. THE THING WE ARE TRYING TO AVOID IS A REVOLVING DOOR AND DEVELOP A CONTINUITY IN THE PERSONNEL PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM. SERVICE CHARGE A. TRAFFIC OFFICER: $13.90/HR. B. TRAFFIC SUPERVISOR: $15.21/HR. THESE RATES INCLUDE COSTS FOR PAY, PAYROLL TAX, WORKERS COM- PENSATION, LIABILITY INSURANCE, UNIFORMS, EQUIPMENT, ADMINI- STRATION AND PROFIT. ~eme~ ~ 6820 La Tijera Blvd.. #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 I[ APR i 1990 Dear ¢~4 .... ef Sayre, ,,o~= aike to take .... ¢ opportunity ~ Int ......... company, A~ CiTY ~ ~ ~=~'~ ~ ¢,Rv~ES, iNC was founded zn ~984 to manage oublzc programs and consult with municiDaiitles and other ~.=~,,,,,=,~ entit One of our maln components ~ protective serv .......... partlcuaar emphasas on the management of ....... c corporate principals have over 40 years of protective ...... e ...... Include ~'aw e .......... ent ~,, the Los Angeles ~eD .......... t and several t~=rfi~ ~elated programs ...... var:ous .~o,~,,e~,, ~<=.~.~.o~,, cities and counties A~ TY ,~A,,AG.~.M~R .............. C is managing crossing Stanton, Westlake Village, Agoura Hills, Vernon, ;~e .......... e~, Downey an~ Ventura ?he ~raditi~, of e~ce~ence an= safety that ALL CiTY ~' ? ~=~'~'~ _ r~ those cltles and counties wl~ oe conzinued in the ~-- ~ Temecuia. management servlce ~'-- company sDeclalizes = the managing o~ ,~ related programs sike ~ours and we wi~ tea&eye your agency of the ~-~ - -~ ~-~ -~ ' ..... e~e=~ ~ .... e .... that accompany those operations. If t~ere are any cuestlons Diease don't hesitate to ,ca~ _ ' _ ~ me at Farwell * Vice President RGF/ir ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 EDUCATION: MASTER DEGREE ~" ~:; ~'~ ~%~.'~"'~ "~.'~' ............. ,,~.~ ANGELES ..... A,iO~' - TERMINA~ r ~ .... ~ AND A~ ~=~~ BETWEEN THOSE =v~o~ .......... TO ...... · ..................... ~ALUAT.~, AND .~98~ - ,. R ...... : , R.NC ~ .... .,AN Au ~, ,E,,. INC ............ ~ ...... ~ ...... .,ANAoEME~,, AND THE PROFESSIONAL & c~,? - =.~,~'~ ,~? ~,= r~ ANGELES ~=~M~o OF ~=0~ ~ ,,AE .... NAACP ( ~ '~ ~ ,.,~,.,B~R) .................. · ,~,.,~ER) 6820 La Tijera Blvd.. ,¢211 · Los Angeles. CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281o0430 "~ASTER DEGREE 1N ~::~?~ A~,,. ....... RA ..... 978 - ~ ,,E ..... : FiNANCiAL SERViCES/LOAN BROKER.'SYNDiCATOR/PROPERTY HANAGER AND REAL ESTATE BROKER 1968 -- i918 ..... O~ D ~A .... R PROFESSIONAL AFF'r~ ~A,,~ REALTORS ~R~A,, LEAGUE ......... ~,, TROJAN ,'-* ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 , A~,., would concent~ ~ts "'*=~="'-*-~ * ' ....... of recruiting ~n ~,,e area where the traffic o~ficer is likely to wor~. In ~he management othe~ ~ro~ram~ we f .... ~ ~ha~ ~ t was more advantageous the program ~ ...... ~..~,~tv values and mores are preserved · . ~ ~ ~ore homogeneous rela~ionsn~o Derween the police, businesses, ' unc% ......... e e~fect'vely personnel recrElted ¢ ..... 4 , - - ~o ...... tn&n the commun&%y. ~ recruitment ..... ~ ~"~' *' ~-~*-~-~ ~- mi=itarv bases, retired Cltlzen gr ...... ~--~-~-'- ~ ~o, ~,~ ~ ~,,~ teachers, =,,~ ~,,=~, ~ewsDaDer adve-~ ~ - ~ .. _ _ ~ ~oe,,,en~, e~c. All applicants will complete applications, interviews and a wr~ tten exam to Catermine *~ ~- ~ -~=~ .... e~, oral and written commun~-~ ion ~'~I~ 'L'he interview would focus on assessing the =,,d~v~dua~' co~unicat Ive ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ...... ies, employment ~ " ~' ~,- ~O~ tO relate _ ~=,~ phase "~lx then have a personal re~erence and bac'~ground -~ ~' ~' applicants must: A) E) Possess = ~'~ * - ' ~ .on Or ~o ~c~va~ent =,~u,, scnoox e~ucaZ' i~ .... .... speak English Possess a properly insure~ venlcle Possess a valid ~' ' - ' ~ive-~ license Be me~caix~ ~:t Possess a home teiepnone ~ccess,u~ completion of all phases _" _ ~a e,,,~,o~,,,en~. The select,on Is then made. Those passing but not selected immediately ~re placed on a avai = x=b~x~ty roster for ~ternate work and subsequently a permanent assignment ALL Cz,: ,.,A ...... .,~'~T SERViCmS ~z,C IS an equal oppor , · employer aria w~l= hire senlot c~e,~o, women, veterans, and all .... ~ ~fled ;~'~"~"~ ' ' ' .... ~ ........ regardless of thezr etnn:c background or religious a~liation. 6820 La Tijera Blvd.., 211 Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 , After the contract is awarde~ and as soon as practicahie a training meet~ ~ ' ~,,~ ~ all personnel will be held '~ ..... ~ng ~o,~e~on of all ore-- employment ~orms: applicat ~ons, W-4 forms, i-9 ~'~ -" ' ' . ~on and revlew o~ the ..... o~ questlonnalres, etc (2) distri ~P., and fznally a tra&nzng session on ~,,e proper 0oiicy ..... ~ ' ' ~,¢ use when di A~ ~=r The ~ ining and orie~t=t~ - . ~on =ess~~ .~ii De t on =mw~yeeo the materlax discusse~ durlng the training meeting. ~I selected personnel will be hired assigned and ~ .... ~ , ~o~ec~e~ orior to +~ .... ~,e beglnn~ng of the contract. ~"=~ ~Cle~t a~ter~ate rosters will be maintained to guarantee that all locations are covered This roster ~ ~iso avaiTM ' ~=D~e to use In appointing personnel to newly opened sites; thereby, insuring immediate response to requests for service. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., ,¢211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 The '==t below reflects ........ ' ~ e ....... g cl~ents except fo~ ~ ' ~o ' ~e City of Los Angeles wh~ ' ended ~ ~ ..... ~ ' ~ ' years ~ ~' ' ~ ~ . ~ ~f '^- Angeles elected ~ ....... e= ..... h~,, government .~ manage the crossing cuards however, they acknowledge ~k~ ~ ; ~,,~ our management program was efficient, well managed and cost effective. ';.$hen the C 4iv of Los Angeles beg,~,, managing the crossing guard program in SeptemDer i988, they utilized the ACM system that we deve ioped. '- ~'~'~' program we managed over 500 emoloyees (393 guards anu aiternates} covering 492 square ..... e~. A~,., set and malntalned a hlgn stan=ard of performance, one In which ACM, ~y iegio and ciZizens of Los ~- ~ Wherever ~' operates ~**g=~es were proud we br~ '" ~nc that same Drl~e and ~ ~ ~ .... eg~ ~ ~ . May ~ ..... ?, after nearzv two ~¢ " A~,., was awarded ~ ~e~a~on~ ~n ~,,e ~ of '~ Angeles, commenaaZion for "~ .... "4 ..... in ~ city 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 REFERE.?'~CE SHEET City ~, nuntlngton ?ark 2oilce Department = z~ ies Ave. Huntington Par~, CA 902~ City ~ Cudany Police Department 5n~ Santa Ana (213) 773-5~ r'~ty oC Anaheim Ariahelm, CA ~5 10660 r., .... ,,eo~e~,, Ave. James Buell - (7"~ City of West ~=~e V~ilage 31824 Village Center Roa~ Westlake Village, CA 91361 - ~o ,~6- 3 Gretchen ~'~~~ "Manager (8~) ~ 161 ~.,~Ich - ASSt tO the ~t~ City of ~I~' W Agoura Road ~9-9~14 Fe l-'tv v~ _ (818) ~o - ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 28,1-0430 REFERENCE ="~ierton Police ~.~lerton, ~ 926~ 800 S. Victor:a Ave. Ventura, ~ 9°~n 074 oe~ ..... ~Ixxer - (71~} 898--331z City of Vernon 4~5 Santa Fe Ave. o0~58 Vernon, CA ~ ~ ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 A suDervlsor will be tested, tralned ~ Chosen ~efore work on ~,,e~ f~e,~ resume is not yet avai~=~e ~or tnls con~rac~ uegins; ~ -e ~- ~ ~ supervisory ~ersonnel. ADDiicants f~. the ...... ~ .... * ~= ~n ,.he ~2c~ an= responsID~lltles o~ the Irar~Ic control oSficer. The interview ....... will suestions for eac~ candidate and *'' be review. Once individuals have been selected to work as field suDervlsors, ~e¥ will be trained ~ .... ~ ' ....... c. the same fashion as the trafflc conzrox o~==" ~ ...... they will also be ~eeping, report "-~" * The supervisor will visit each site under ~is/her supervision on · . . a regular bas~s It has seen our experience nave a success~ ant e~fective program, on-going and open xlnes of communication ~ ~ ex~ ~ ~o,,~oI of~' ~ ,,uo~ t setween traf ~o .~ICer, _ ~lce o~flclals and California m~,wa~ ?atro~ personnel. ALL CiTY ~"~'~=~'=~ SERVi~ ~'~ "'~11 coordinaze ~ superr=~e an~ con=rol the activities of the field supervisor, ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 0820 La Tijera Blvd., ~211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 ~ ' ' ' ~n this program wial be The orlmary means of communlcat~on ...... ~h the use of telephones and beepets. All designated ~n~ persons ?emecula C~t~ o~,sc io and Police ~epa ..... en~ c will be given ~he ohone number messages can be relayed to the field supervisor. The field supervisor will be on SeeDer and available for immediate The Imar¥ ~eo.o,,o=billt~es of ~ ~, ~ ~m ~ ~,,e field supervisor ~a~e,,,e,,~ of regular and a ......... traff sites; =.~o,~o~.~ =ix sltes ~ ensure ~,,=~ a~x o~flcers are on ~-~ not leaving early and comp~"~"- '~ ~z~,,~ wi~,, ~e company policy; C Preoaration of ~" ' ' · _ .... = activity logs, reporting ~tes visited each day; ~,eop~,,~,,g and ~ .... ~ ~ ' ~=,~eo~=ga~ng any ~" ~1ons ~=,,~ or incidents; E. Recruiting, tralning and discipline of personnel; F Distr~"~' - .... ~ ' ' .... ion of ~a~l checks and time G. Preparation of various reports. The field supervisor wiTM ........ and be reimbursed ~ use their own for - ~ ~ ~ . Pr ..... eawe ior to being allowed to drive, the supervisor .... ~ submit a copy of his/her drivers license and proof .... en~ and valid Insurance. ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 Attorney at Law 1880 Century Park East, Suite 1018 =os ~.ge~es, CA ~0 ~,,~a~t: Charles Certified Puolic Accountants 17°~ Ventuz~u 31vd c ..... 210 Encino, CA 91316 ...... er Pacific Bank ~ ~,,, ........ Blvd. Beverly Hills, CA 90211 ~o ...... : Pau~ Fer~no - Manager Specialty Unl~ -- = -~-~ Los Angeles, CA 90037 ...... c~: Lou Fields San ?edro, CA ,~,,~c~: ~o~ieen Amos ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 =,v.o? ~v== EVALUAT~'~- There are several important factors '~-~ ...... 4~ e,~ions of ~ ' " ~. These include; ~tt .... e, appearance ~mDloveeo abili~" to work and communicate wi~ ~ ~, others, prevlous experience ,.~anage.,e.. ~ CorDorat selected to work =o traffic control ~flcers represent Client ~ ...... +~ ' ,,~R oo~e~**.,e**~ Entlty and ALL CITY ~'~=~'~'~ o~ while on ~uty. For thls reason ~ ..... be ,,~,~ o=iec~ive the persons hired ~or ~he program. ~" ,.,e~, must also be of moral character and a true professional in every sense of the word. in order to de,3s'op profes=ionalism, a periodic empiovee e ...... ion report will be ..... p~e~ed on each employee ~-- the field supervisor. The employee will be rated on appearance, attitude, +~ Those -~ + .... be ~ou..~ o De deficient n any area wi~x e.,,~oyees = ~ ~ counseled, refrained, disciplined or terminated based on the oeverzty of the act and the employees response ...... of response to corrective measures. ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. 6820 La Tijera Blvd., #211 · L. os Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 568-9060 · (213) 281-0430 All Ci . Management ~ ...... ~-'" ..... ~ ~ ~o.~.~,~,, ,,~ix do every ~ ~ ' ~ ........ ~ * per~ ....... During z~e operation ~ ~= ..... ee a hlgh level '-~ ' of ~ program we ~ ...... That the Cltv of Temecula has certain performance level expectatlons; the.e~o.e, we .... ~ave our oper~thons closely supervised and managed so ..... problem £he cilent is certalniy not expected ~ Da-- for services not ,_e,,==~e~ out, we fee~ ~,,=~ ~ines against ~ne contractor not be auzoma~ic ~ .... to making a deciol ..... impose a fine zor xacz of performance, the .... tractor ..... ad be given ,~:~po~ tun~ ,_~ ~nves ~w=~e an~ collect a~= re=evant ~ata, such =~e, T~,me and Location Witnesses and severity of ~~ etc A~- the sara is ~ected, a report -to ~ ....... e C~ient agency oe submitted t is at ,_h~s stage ~+ the discussion ~ fines an~ Dosslbie reme~i~ to avoid ="~ .... ~ =o ~e occurrences o,,o~ take place. April ALL CITY MANAGEMENT CO. (5820 La Tijera Blvd.. #211 · Los Angeles, CA 90045 (213) 5(58-9060 · (213) 281-0430 Sayre, ~nc~osed you Wll~ 21n~ a oro~osa~ ' r i ~ Iraff4~ Control ¢=ficers ........................ o i? 6~ 00 084 00 $ 12 7~n O0 ~ ~ 4 88 Liability insurance (includes non-owned auto) 043 ~ ,~n~Zorms (~nciudes caD, ra",n gear, jacket, etc.) 063 *~ lies & EcuiDment Aamlnlstratlve Oremead 2n=s proposal ~ based on = wage determlnation ~ 88 00 Der ..... .~=..~c cers and $8 ~n ~ per ~our for supervlSlO~ The billing =~ rate $~ 96 per hour The cost given above covers one whole year of service .... can easily be adjusted downward based on the length of service needed, ~ ~ . ~. ~ - professional management company anG we will relieve your agency ~**e ~~C Control 0¢¢4 ' ~,=cer We maintain a ,000,0 insurance policy. =~:.4 G Farwell - Vice President ALL CITY ,.,ANA~,',~N. SERVi~ ~'~ 'ZHE ~ = ~'~ ~'~ ~OPL~ CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PRODUCER LFC INSURANCE 625 SO. NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE. LO~ ANGELE~ CA 9(Xl05 / ,,,THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY LETTER A Amez~cms ~mpire INSURED ~ll City l~=~age~mt, 6820 La Ti.le~a Slvd., ~20~ ~s ~gel~, ~ 90045 COMPANY LETTER B COMPANY LETTER C COMPANY LETTER D COMPANY LETTER E COVERAGES.. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- ~ll;~i;~..'~['c "'~']"~'~*l. ~: ~.~,~., :,. :;. ~r.~ ~,'..,',; .~.:'.~.~.,=..,. ~. ~.,..,:, :,. ,: ~>;:~ .~ ;.., :.,:,~ ~-..~ ~ .: :... E TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS III~"~I~J~L LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY I OWNER'S & ~0NTRACTORS PROTECT',VE IAUTOMOBILE LIABILITY · ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS ~'iON-OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABtLt~ 9S~33432 EXCESS LIABILITY t 0THER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OTHER STATUTORY $ $ $ (EACH ACCIDENT) ,DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT) iO[SEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES / RESTRICTIONS / SPECIAL ITEMS It is hereby agzeed that HOLDER th~ certificate holder is an sddtttonal i~su~ed as thei~ interest 92805 ACORD 25-S (11/85) CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX. PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE CO.M_PANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' IIR/ACORD CORPORATION 1985 STATE ,.o. ,ox COMPENSATION INSURANCE I=UN O CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE J ~ L ¥ I * ~, t -~ ~ ~ POLICY NUMBER: CERTIFICATE EXPIRES: .This is to certify,t.hat~we have issued a valid Workers' ,ComPensation.insuranc~::policyJ~a.~mapprove~by-the-,Cali~oPnia.~.~..*--- ~*:~ l'hsuFance c0'mmi'~-s';~r to ;the emplo'~er nam~l below for the policy period indicated. This policy is not subject to cancellation by the Fund except upon ten days' advance written notice to the employer. We will also give you TEN days' advance notice should this policy be cancelled prior to its normal expiration. This certificate of insurance is not an insurance policy and does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed herein. Notwithstanding any requirement, term, or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate of insurance may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies. ~J~PRESIDENT F- EMPLOYER ~LL CITY VANA6~ENT ~EVERLY HILLS CA, ~C212 L City of Temecula Police Department To: City Council 04-27-90 Fm: Chief Sayre Re: 1-15 Over-Crossing Traffic Control On 04-26-90, the City of Temecula Traffic Safety Advisory Committee reviewed the 1-15 Over-Crossing Traffic Control report. Their unanimous recommended was to approve a contract with All City Management Company. Their only request was that preference for employment be given to local citizens during the hire cycle. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT AB#: HTG: DEPT: TITLE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 DEPT HD CITY ATTY CITY MGR RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving (Winchester Properties) Utility Agreement for AD-161 BACKGROUND: City Attorney Scott Field has asked that we place this matter on your agenda for the meeting of May 1, 1990. He has indicated the Agenda Report and final version of the Resolution will be transmitted to the City Clerk's Department by Monday, April 30, 1990. We will forward that material to you as soon as we receive it.