Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
012511 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JANUARY 25, 2011 — 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:30 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council/Temecula Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section: 1) Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of pending litigation to which the City is a plaintiff. The title of the litigation is City of Temecula, et. al. v. Tovey/Shultz Construction, Inc., et. al., Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 541908 (Old Town Community Theater construction litigation). 2) Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of pending litigation to which the City is a defendant. The title of the litigation is Alissa Gross etc. v. Landscape Structures, Inc., City of Temecula, et. al., Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 538128. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: 11-02 Resolution: 11-09 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts Prelude Music: Joshua Jurkosky and Ron Savitt Invocation: Pastor John Ruhlman of Life Church Flag Salute: Council Member Edwards ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Washington, Roberts 1 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five minute (5) time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of January 11, 2011. 3 List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 2 RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approval of the fiscal year 2011-12 Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TVTBID) Advisory Board's Annual Report and Levy of an Assessment against Lodging Businesses within the TVTBID for fiscal year 2011-12 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011- 12 AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF 5 Roripaugh Ranch — Approval of Sixth Operating Memorandum RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SIXTH OPERATING MEMORANDUM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ASHBY USA LLC AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR SUNWOOD RORIPAUGH RANCH LLC, BHT- RORIPAUGH WB99 LLC, AND WINGSWEEP CORPORATION, OWNERS OF LOT 7 OF FINAL TRACT MAP 29353-1, TRACT 29661-2, AND LOT 1 OF FINAL TRACT MAP 29353-1, RESPECTIVELY, WITHIN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT 3 6 Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Second Amendment with ProActive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc. for an additional amount of $29,000 to increase the existing contract amount to $59,000. 7 5 -Year Agreement for Animal Control and Sheltering Services between the City of Temecula and Animal Friends of the Valleys (aka L.E.A.F.) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the five year Agreement for Animal Control and Sheltering Services between the City of Temecula and Animal Friends of the Valleys at a cost of $247,500 annually; 7.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve additional service not to exceed $30,000 annually. 8 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 11-01 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 11-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS WITH OR WITHOUT A CAR WASH IN PLANNING AREA 10 UTILIZING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ******************** 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 11-01 Resolution: No. CSD 11-01 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 9 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the action minutes of January 11, 2011. 10 Youth Work Experience Program Partnership RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center and the Temecula Community Services District to establish a youth employment work experience program. CSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 11 Community Services Department Monthly Report 5 CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 6 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 11-01 Resolution: No. RDA 11-01 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Mike Naggar ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington, Naggar RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 12 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the action minutes of January 11, 2011. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 13 Redevelopment Department Monthly Report RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS RDA ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 7 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 14 An Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Planning Application Nos. PA08- 0241 and PA08-0242, Islamic Center of Temecula Valley, a two -Phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot structure on 4.32 acres within a VL zone at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA08-0241 AND PA08- 0242, A TWO-PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TWO-STORY, 24,943 SQUARE FOOT RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 4.32 ACRES WITHIN A VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE COLIBRI (APN 957-140-012) DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 15 Planning Department Monthly Report 16 City Council Travel/Conference Report - December 2010 17 Public Works Department Monthly Report 18 Police Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 8 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at the Main Reception at City Hall (41000 Main Street, Temecula) or at the Temecula Library (30600 Pauba Road, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the packet may as well be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review at the Main Reception at the Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula — 8:00 — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's web — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please contact City Clerk's Department — 951-694-6444. 9 CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 1 Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET JANUARY 11, 2011 — 7:00 PM The City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts Prelude Music: Susan Miyamoto Invocation: Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel of Temecula Flag Salute: Council Member Comerchero ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Washington, Roberts PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of gavel to incoming Mayor Ron Roberts. Service Awards - Ron Roberts, Ron Guerriero, Felicia Hogan, and Stan Harter PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals addressed the City Council: • Robert Skiff • Fred Grindle • Chuck Rear • George Rombach • Suzanne Rombach • Wayne Hall • Randy Thompson • Mano Bakh • Lana Tomlinson • Jacqueline LeBeau CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Action Minutes\011111 1 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of December 14, 2010. 3 List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2010 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2010. 5 Inland Empire Heart Association Heart Fundraiser Walk (at the request of Mayor Roberts - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize the City to become a media sponsor for the Heart Association Fundraiser Walk. Action Minutes\011111 2 6 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements - Phase I, Project No. PW09-02 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements — Phase I, Project No. PW09-02. 7 Tract Map No. 34698, located on the north side of Date Street at Lakeview Road, between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, within Harveston Specific Plan - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Council Member Comerchero who abstained RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Tract Map No. 34698 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval. 8 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map No. 25004 (located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and east of Seraphina Road - KB Homes) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 25004) 9 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map Nos. 31053, 31053-1, 31053-2, and 31053-3 (located southeasterly of the corner of Date Street and Ynez Road within the Harveston Subdivision — Meritage Homes) - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Council Member Comerchero who abstained RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Action Minutes\011111 3 RESOLUTION NO. 11-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NOS. 31053, 31053-1, 31053-2, AND 31053-3) 10 All -Way Stop Control - Sunny Meadows Drive and Corbie Street - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF SUNNY MEADOWS DRIVE AND CORBIE STREET 11 Urban Forestry Grant Program - "An Urban Forest for Every City" - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FUNDING FROM THE URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM ENTITLED, "AN URBAN FOREST FOR EVERY CITY", AS PROVIDED THROUGH PROPOSITIONS 40 AND 84 12 Approve a Maintenance Agreement for the Street Striping Program FY 2010-2011, Project No. PW09-04 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve a $300,000 Maintenance Agreement with Pacific Striping, Inc. for the total cost of work associated with the First and Second Cycle of the bi-annual Citywide Street Striping Program for the Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Project No. PW09-04; 12.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $30,000, which is equal to 10% of the total agreement. Action Minutes\011111 4 13 Police Department Asset Forfeiture Account Purchases - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the purchase of Police equipment for a total amount of $6,119 with asset forfeiture funds held by the County of Riverside Sheriff's Department. 14 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 10-15 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 10-15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A ZONING AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF A PARCEL LOCATED AT 42210 LYNDIE LANE FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (H) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) At 7:54 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency. At 7:59 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business. PUBLIC HEARING 17 Specific Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and Development Plan for (Planning Application Nos. PA09-0246, PA09-0287, and PA09-0288) RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Naggar; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval ORDINANCE NO. 11-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS WITH OR WITHOUT A CAR WASH IN PLANNING AREA 10 UTILIZING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT 17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval Action Minutes\011111 5 RESOLUTION NO. 11-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA09-0287, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A 946 -SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THRU CAR WASH AT THE EXISTING ARCO AM/PM GAS STATION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND NICOLAS ROADS ADDRESSED AS 40212 WINCHESTER ROAD (APN 920-100-048) 17.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RESOLUTION NO. 11-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA09-0288, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 946 -SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THRU CAR WASH AT THE EXISTING ARCO AM/PM GAS STATION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND NICOLAS ROADS, ADDRESSED AS 40212 WINCHESTER ROAD (APN 920-100-048) 17.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RESOLUTION NO. 11-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 946 -SQUARE FOOT DRIVE-THRU CAR WASH AT THE EXISTING ARCO AM/PM GAS STATION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND NICOLAS ROADS, ADDRESSED AS 40212 WINCHESTER ROAD (APN 920-100-048) CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 18 Selection of 2011 City Council Committee Assignments RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees: - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Naggar; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval Action Minutes\011111 6 Commission Liaison (One Member) Current Member Community Services Commission Comerchero Old Town Local Review Board Washington Planning Commission Naggar Public/Traffic Safety Commission Edwards 18.2 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Standing Committees: - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Naggar; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval Standing Committees Current Member(s) City Sustainability Program Committee Roberts, Washington Economic Development Committee Washington, Roberts RDA/Old Town Steering Committee (Suggest RDA Chairman be considered) Roberts, Naggar Finance Committee Naggar, Washington Infrastructure Beautification Committee Edwards, Naggar Joint City Council/TVUSD Committee Edwards, Washington Murrieta/Temecula Committee Naggar, Washington Public Works/Facilities Committee Edwards, Roberts Quality of Life/Temecula 2030 Master Plan Committee Roberts, Washington Southwest Cities Coalition Committee Edwards, Comerchero 18.3 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Representative Assignments (External Organizations): - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Mayor Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval with following abstentions: RCA Representative Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Transit Agency Representative WRCOG - Edwards, Washington - Edwards - Roberts & Comerchero - Comerchero & Edwards - Roberts & Washington Representative Assignments (External Organizations) Current Member(s) Animal Shelter Liaison/JPA Representative Edwards League of California Congress — 2011 Voting Delegate (Suggest Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem) Roberts, (Alternate Washington) National League of Cities Annual Congress — 2011 Voting Delegate (Suggest Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem) Roberts, (Alternate Washington) Military Liaison Representative - new Comerchero Murrieta Creek Representative deleted Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison Roberts, (Alternate Naggar) RCA Representative Edwards, (Alternate Washington) Action Minutes\011111 7 Rancho California Water District Liaison Comerchero, Roberts Riverside County Child Safety Commission (Suggest possible deletion) deleted Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board Edwards Riverside County Transportation Commission Roberts, (Alternate Comerchero) Riverside Transit Agency Representative Comerchero, (Alternate Edwards) Temecula Sister City Liaison Roberts WRCOG/Zone Committee (relating to TUMF Program for WRCOG) (Suggest combining WRCOG & Zone Committee) Washington, (Alternate Roberts) Riverside County Child Safety Commission/School District Liaison — new Edwards 18.4 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Ad Hoc Subcommittees: - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval Ad Hoc Subcommittees — (Can be one or two members) Current Member(s) Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Washington Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Washington External Communications Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Edwards Firestone Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Naggar French Valley Parkway Interchange Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Roberts Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Washington Homeless Needs Ad Hoc Subcommittee Washington, Edwards Jefferson Corridor Ad Hoc Subcommittee - new Roberts, Comerchero Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee Washington, Roberts Military Ad Hoc Subcommittee (Suggest combining with Military Liaison added above) deleted Nicolas Valley Ad Hoc Subcommittee Roberts, Washington Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Roberts Old Town Gym Ad Hoc Subcommittee — new Comerchero, Washington Promenade Mall Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Washington Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Naggar Roripaugh Ranch Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Roberts Santa Margarita Annexation Ad Hoc Subcommittee Edwards, Comerchero Action Minutes\011111 8 South Temecula Land and Transportation Ad Hoc Subcommittee Roberts, Washington Summerhouse Senior Housing Development Ad Hoc Subcommittee — changed title to Summerhouse Housing Development Ad Hoc Subcommittee Roberts, Washington Temecula Healthcare Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Naggar Transit/Transportation Ad Hoc Subcommittee Roberts, Comerchero Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee Comerchero, Edwards Youth Court Ad Hoc Subcommittee deleted Youth Master Plan Implementation Ad Hoc Subcommittee Naggar, Washington CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that under the Brown Act, there was nothing to report from the Closed Session. ADJOURNMENT At 8:34 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 25, 2011, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes\011111 9 Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Leah Thomas, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $3,380,789.20 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2011. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 12/29/2010 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/06/2011 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 01/13/2011 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/31/2010 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 01/06/2011 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01/25/2011 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 869,891.39 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 427,423.66 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 302,757.36 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 147.03 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 612.04 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 4,914.90 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 13,783.39 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 849,044.37 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT 46,234.94 300 INSURANCE FUND 230,865.96 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 65,807.42 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 11,239.85 340 FACILITIES 26,764.42 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,500.00 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 3,216.45 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,950.03 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 1,884.35 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,816.82 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,816.82 477 CFD- RORIPAUGH 25,952.46 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 2,827.66 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 2,369.94 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 166.70 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 654.83 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 2,401.34 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 1,616.16 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 1,735.72 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 1,826.30 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 77.42 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 133.98 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 257.81 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 1,566.09 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 199.18 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 2,967.91 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 93.66 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 190.59 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 316.35 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 16,900.43 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 207.83 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 9,218.55 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 743.88 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 69.13 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 32.00 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 24 HARVESTON 372.31 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 310.29 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 56.99 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 27 AVONDALE 196.41 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 536.77 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C'ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 60.26 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 4,588.22 001 GENERAL FUND $ 245,799.19 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 10,641.12 $ 401,496.28 686,139.30 1,856,682.79 22,720.53 413,750.30 $ 3,380,789.20 2,944,318.37 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 92,188.11 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 143.96 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 903.67 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 888.77 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 274.95 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT 6,541.97 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,392.96 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 41,375.05 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,931.66 340 FACILITIES 8,394.68 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 91.73 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 60.98 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 72.40 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 13.38 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 147.34 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 26.58 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 37.97 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 250.09 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 2.03 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 11.00 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 7.01 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 166.70 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 35.65 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 20.69 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 17.71 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 41.54 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 3.51 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 154.41 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 82.80 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 224.07 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 378.88 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 9.05 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 9.92 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 213.38 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 68.56 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 3.00 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 9.92 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 314.66 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 6.01 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 19,513.77 436,470.83 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 3,380,789.20 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 12/29/2010 8:27:55AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 143008 12/22/2010 002185 POSTMASTER postage:"we've moved" postcards 756.00 756.00 143009 12/29/2010 005068 ADKISSON, CANDICE Employee Computer Loan Pgrm 612.34 612.34 143010 12/29/2010 009033 ALLEN, STEVEN L. photography svc: Civic Ctr 12/9 300.00 photography svc:winter wdrind 12/10 300.00 600.00 143011 12/29/2010 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT equip rental:tree lighting 12/2 610.10 610.10 143012 12/29/2010 012943 ALPHA MECHANICAL SERVICE HVAC svcs: city hall 80.00 80.00 INC 143013 12/29/2010 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DUI & DRUG SCREENINGS: POLICE 575.12 (AFN) DUI & DRUG SCREENINGS: POLICE 377.56 952.68 143014 12/29/2010 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC (88) book purchase: Library 1,959.68 1,959.68 143015 12/29/2010 000128 BROWN & BROWN OF CALIF INC 10/11 trvl grp gen liab #gp06302497 122,639.00 10/11 excs liab ins #843300 ironshore 41,713.00 10/11 trvl grp umb liab ins #GE06300161 20,805.00 10/11 trvl grp auto #8109158P917 19,127.00 143016 12/29/2010 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Dec copier leases: Library 2,836.52 INC 143017 12/29/2010 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE supplies:bkfastw/Santa 12/11 220.95 supplies:Civic Ctr Opening 12/9 99.19 143018 12/29/2010 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD 2,133.04 FUELING INC 204,284.00 2,836.52 320.14 Fuel for City vehicles: B&S 521.92 Fuel for City vehicles: Code Enf 385.11 3,040.07 143019 12/29/2010 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Dec 39569 seraphina rd 164.80 164.80 DIST 143020 12/29/2010 011203 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING Dec janitorial svc:park restrooms 5,315.00 5,315.00 143021 12/29/2010 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE (94) tree installations:crowne hill 8,030.00 8,030.00 143022 12/29/2010 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK sttlmnt: Nutcracker Ballet Dec '10 44,604.05 44,604.05 143023 12/29/2010 011781 FIRE INNOVATIONS LLC misc fire tools: Stn 73 870.96 870.96 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 12/29/2010 8:27:55AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 143024 12/29/2010 011922 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC Nov database subscr:Code Enf INC Amount Paid Check Total 12.00 12.00 143025 12/29/2010 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 013353 AMERICASPRINTER.COM AA printing Winterfest sheets/cards:ED 1,986.58 004811 HEWLETT PACKARD TT (10) pc adapters: Info Sys 998.42 009815 CARD QUEST INC TT (200) proximity cards: Info Sys 783.59 004811 HEWLETT PACKARD TT (26) computer power cords:IS 560.40 013353 AMERICASPRINTER.COM AA printing Winterfest sheets/card:ED 522.00 012915 LUCILLE'S BBQ SJ meal:closed council mtg 11/9 241.85 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS SJ utility cart: city clerk 217.49 DIV 002652 PAT & OSCARS RESTAURANT RJ meal:pin commission mtg 12/1 170.01 012112 PALUMBOS RISTORANTE SJ meal:closed council mtg 11/23 147.68 001048 ROSAS CANTINA TT refreshments: IS staff move 11/13 85.51 RESTAURANT 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS DIV TT wireless keyboard adapter: Info Sys 59.79 013969 NETWORK SOLUTIONS TT council domain @citycouncil.org 34.99 008669 VONS SJ refreshments:ethics trn 11/17 24.94 008956 PANERA BREAD TT refreshments:IS staff move 11-13 20.02 5,853.27 143026 12/29/2010 010326 G E MOBILE WATER, INC Dec power washer maint:Stn 73 57.00 Dec power washer rent:Stn 73 26.10 83.10 143027 12/29/2010 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC sttlmnt: Merc Sunday Classics 5,400.00 5,400.00 SOCIETY 143028 12/29/2010 004406 IGOE & COMPANY INC Dec flex benefit plan pmt 515.00 515.00 143029 12/29/2010 013555 JJJ ENTERPRISES fire alarm sys maint: library 388.50 388.50 143030 12/29/2010 004546 KING, JAMES N. performance:NewYear's Eve 3,000.00 3,000.00 143031 12/29/2010 012065 LANCE, SOLL& LUNGHARD '10 FINAL ENGAGEMENT: FINANCE 508.00 508.00 LLC Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 12/29/2010 8:27:55AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 143032 12/29/2010 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC 143033 12/29/2010 002634 LITELINES INC 143034 12/29/2010 012962 MILLER, MISTY 143035 12/29/2010 000973 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT 143036 12/29/2010 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES 143037 12/29/2010 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 143038 12/29/2010 000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT 143039 12/29/2010 001365 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF 143040 12/29/2010 012251 ROTH, DONALD J. 143041 12/29/2010 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC 143042 12/29/2010 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 143043 12/29/2010 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 143044 12/29/2010 010162 STEMRICH, CYNTHIA 143045 12/29/2010 009061 STURDIVANT, ANGELA P. (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Medical Supplies: Paramedics 817.31 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 356.96 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 212.99 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 155.37 1,542.63 lighting supplies: old town 163.14 163.14 TCSD Instructor Earnings 514.50 514.50 PLAYGROUND EQUIP MAINT:VAR 1,462.78 1,462.78 PARKS- publication:advertising:OT quilt show 196.77 196.77 Dec var water meters:tcsd svc lev C 35,408.37 Dec 01-04-47210-0:TES pool SC -2 315.33 Nov 01-31-61237-2:calle elenita 28.57 35,752.27 Nov K -Rat payment 4,320.00 4,320.00 July -Sep '10 vector control svcs 6,378.37 6,378.37 TCSD Instructor Earnings 567.00 567.00 sttlemnt:Jazz @ the Merc 12/16 210.00 210.00 Nov 2-00-397-5059:comm svc util Nov 2-27-560-0625:32380 deerhollow Nov 2-30-296-9522:31035 rncho vista Dec 2-31-693-9784:26036 ynez TC1 Nov 2-29-974-7568:26953 ynez TC1 Nov 2-29-807-1226:28077 diaz PED Nov 2-30-099-3847:29721 ryecrest Nov 2-29-807-1093:28079 diaz PED 10,235.91 3,627.92 583.04 490.80 123.55 23.69 22.57 9.85 15,117.33 Dec 015-575-0195-2:FS #92 430.05 Dec 055-475-6169-5:PBSP 151.13 581.18 refund:sec dep:rm rental:CRC 250.00 250.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 145.60 145.60 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 12/29/2010 8:27:55AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143046 12/29/2010 013968 TEMECULA DANCE CO MAKE A sttlemnt:The Nutcracker 12/14-15 10,643.25 10,643.25 143047 12/29/2010 005970 TEMECULA VALLEY PLAYERS sttlemnt:A Christmas Carol:OT 8,146.78 8,146.78 143048 12/29/2010 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Dec high speed internet:Civic Center 5,372.16 Dec high speed internet:FS #92 143049 12/29/2010 004145 TW TELECOM Dec City phones general usage 143050 12/29/2010 004794 VALLEY WINDS COMMUNITY Performance:holiday in Old Town - 143051 12/29/2010 004261 VERIZON Dec xxx-5072 general usage Dec xxx-0073 general usage Dec xxx-3143 gen usage:PD ovrind ofc Dec xxx-5473 gen usage:moraga rd Dec xxx-8573 general usage 102.32 5,474.48 5,688.08 5,688.08 400.00 400.00 1,593.16 87.47 54.03 36.07 36.07 1,806.80 143052 12/29/2010 004789 VERIZON ONLINE Dec Internet svcs:City Hall 269.99 269.99 143053 12/29/2010 006248 WALKER, JESSICA 143054 12/29/2010 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF 143055 12/29/2010 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY 143056 12/29/2010 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings Nov '10 TUMF Payment Nov '10 MSHCP payment reimb:ofc supplies:civic ctr file rm 100.80 19.60 8,873.00 1,938.00 137.72 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 120.40 8,873.00 1,938.00 137.72 401,496.28 Page4 apChkLst Final Check List 12/29/2010 8:27:55AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 49 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 401,496.28 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1614 12/31/2010 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 13,299.68 13,299.68 1615 12/31/2010 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Income Taxes Payment 3,897.65 3,897.65 1616 12/31/2010 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS Retirement Payment 1,506.81 1,506.81 RETIREMENT) 1617 01/06/2011 000245 PERS - HEALTH I NSUR PERS Health Admin Cost Payment 80,043.01 80,043.01 PREMIUM 1618 01/06/2011 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- Project Retirement Payment 1,818.54 1,818.54 SOLUTION 1619 01/06/2011 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD Support Payment 553.84 553.84 SUPPORT 1620 01/06/2011 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE Child Care Reimbursement Payment 8,852.89 8,852.89 1621 01/06/2011 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment 122,742.20 122,742.20 RETIREMENT) 1622 01/06/2011 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Nationwide Retirement Payment 13,910.17 13,910.17 SOLUTION 1623 01/06/2011 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 77,355.34 77,355.34 1624 01/06/2011 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 22,404.76 22,404.76 143057 01/06/2011 003552 AFLAC AFLAC Cancer Payment 3,260.81 3,260.81 143058 01/06/2011 005068 ADKISSON, CANDICE reimb:MPSC New Year's supplies 274.30 274.30 143059 01/06/2011 013844 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES Nov data svc:long cyn det basin 550.00 550.00 INC 143060 01/06/2011 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES piano tuning: theater 170.00 170.00 143061 01/06/2011 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT equip rental:OT holidays 11/26 14.45 equip rental:winter wonderland 1,450.59 equip rental:Winterfest 12/11 144.93 1,609.97 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143062 01/06/2011 012943 ALPHA MECHANICAL SERVICE HVAC maint: parking garage 305.00 305.00 INC 143063 01/06/2011 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY battery supplies: PW Traffic 24.65 24.65 CORPORATION 143064 01/06/2011 013338 APPLE STORE Employee Computer Loan Program 2,000.00 2,000.00 143065 01/06/2011 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO Jan drinking water svc:Civic Ctr 92.44 92.44 143066 01/06/2011 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC (14) book purchase: Library 259.26 259.26 143067 01/06/2011 003215 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS subsc:2599627 title 13 motor veh 328.00 328.00 143068 01/06/2011 013684 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA COBRA SUBSIDY MEDICAL PAYMENT 978.89 978.89 143069 01/06/2011 004851 C B RANCH ENTERPRISES flower field excursion: MPSC 200.00 200.00 143070 01/06/2011 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 428.04 PW patch truck materials 214.56 PW patch truck materials 810.19 PW patch truck materials 410.36 1,863.15 143071 01/06/2011 010939 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL elevator conveyance 139731:theater 225.00 225.00 143072 01/06/2011 001159 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE Nov fingerprinting svcs:HR/PD 2,750.00 2,750.00 143073 01/06/2011 006114 CASEY, MARGIE reimb:office supplies Info Sys 123.29 123.29 143074 01/06/2011 000137 CHEVRON AND TEXACO City vehicles fuel: CM 351.84 351.84 143075 01/06/2011 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH Community Health Charities Payment 66.00 66.00 CHARITIES 143076 01/06/2011 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MAINT SVC: MPSC 75.00 alarm maint svc: Fld Op Ctr 75.00 Jan -Mar alarm monitoring:citywide 4,920.00 5,070.00 143077 01/06/2011 012353 CONSTRUCTION TESTING Nov geotech svc: Civic Center 3,600.00 3,600.00 143078 01/06/2011 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE misc supplies:emp recognition 739.27 739.27 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143079 01/06/2011 008810 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & equip repair/maint: PW Traffic 552.00 552.00 DATA 143080 01/06/2011 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON plotter supplies: info systems 312.50 312.50 COMPANY INC 143081 01/06/2011 012600 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES NOV CNSLT SVC:BUTTERFIELD STG 2,119.08 2,119.08 INC RD 143082 01/06/2011 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATES Nov -Dec lobbyist svcs: CM 7,000.00 7,000.00 143083 01/06/2011 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Jan restroom svc:Veterans Pk 52.88 SRVCS 143084 01/06/2011 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING INC Jan restroom svc:Lng Cyn Pk Jan restroom svc:Riverton Pk Jan restroom svc:Redhawk Pk portable restrooms:light parade portable restrooms:light parade 52.88 52.88 52.88 705.69 5,298.00 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Traffic 260.31 Fuel for City vehicles: PW CIP Fuel for City vehicles: PW Maint Fuel for City vehicles: PW Lnd Dv Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD Fuel for City vehicles: Police 143085 01/06/2011 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 143086 01/06/2011 011967 FULL VALUE ENTERTAINMENT sttlmnt: Live at the Merc 12/17 143087 01/06/2011 011283 GABRIEL ROEDER SMITH & Aug cnslt svc:OPEB valuation COMPANY 6,215.21 181.03 1,231.81 197.49 116.92 51.14 2,038.70 50.00 50.00 112.00 112.00 6,126.00 Nov cnslt svc:OPEB valuation 258.00 Oct cnslt svc:OPEB valuation 654.00 Sept cnslt svc:OPEB valuation 3,681.00 10,719.00 143088 01/06/2011 013552 GANDS PRODUCTIONS LLC sttlmnt: Country at the Merc 12/18 618.00 618.00 143089 01/06/2011 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC sttlmnt: Classics at the Merc Dec '10 1,579.50 1,579.50 SOCIETY 143090 01/06/2011 003792 GRAINGER Portable Generators: Citizen Corps 1,132.20 1,132.20 143091 01/06/2011 004188 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES Nov pavement rehab: citywide 44,433.75 44,433.75 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 143092 01/06/2011 001135 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL Emp industrial care svcs: HR 25.00 25.00 GROUP INC 143093 01/06/2011 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE res impry pgrm: Ortiz, Misel/Amy 364.00 364.00 143094 01/06/2011 002701 HUB INT'L INSURANCE Dec '10 special events premiums 293.34 293.34 SERVCS INC 143095 01/06/2011 000194 I CMA RETIREMENT -PLAN I CMA Retirement Trust 457 Payment 4,804.84 4,804.84 303355 143096 01/06/2011 013420 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES (7) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY 278.73 INC 143097 01/06/2011 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT (1) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY (3) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY (2) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY (117) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY (49) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY 12/10 doc shred svc: City Hall 12/20 doc shred svc: Library 12/20 doc shred svc: CRC 41.17 19.47 12.22 803.14 371.56 35.00 15.00 15.00 1,526.29 65.00 143098 01/06/2011 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT Nov copier maint/usage:Library 630.07 SOLUTIONS Nov copier maint/usage:citywide 2,945.65 3,575.72 143099 01/06/2011 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY pool santizing chemicals:citywide 713.35 713.35 INC 143100 01/06/2011 004119 J T B SUPPLY COMPANY INC misc light supplies: PW Traffic 1,389.83 misc light supplies:PW Traffic 2,392.50 3,782.33 143101 01/06/2011 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC Jacob's House Charity Payment 200.00 200.00 143102 01/06/2011 013200 JAROTH INC Jan pay phone:RDA:OT bus depot 82.64 Jan pay phone:duck pond,library,crc 212.64 295.28 143103 01/06/2011 013788 KOA CORPORATION traffic study: Islamic Center 1,400.00 1,400.00 143104 01/06/2011 012422 KRONQUIST, MATHEW holiday lighting: Old Town 30,000.00 30,000.00 143105 01/06/2011 004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC (2) ProLaser radars: Police 6,365.50 6,365.50 143106 01/06/2011 012065 LANCE, SOLL& LUNGHARD STATE CONTROLLER'S RPT: FINANCE 1,250.00 1,250.00 LLC Page4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143107 01/06/2011 004176 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS Dec Long distance & internet svcs 741.00 741.00 LLC 143108 01/06/2011 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & Nov HR legal svcs for TE060-01 243.00 243.00 WHITMORE 143109 01/06/2011 013769 LIGHTSQUARED LP 12/14-1/13 satellite svc:CM/Fire 146.48 146.48 143110 01/06/2011 013971 LYN, MARGARET ROSE refund:sec dep:rm rm rental:CRC 250.00 250.00 143111 01/06/2011 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS Misc signs: PW Maint 78.30 Misc signs: PW Traffic 495.90 574.20 143112 01/06/2011 004141 MAINTEX INC Cleaning & maint supplies:citywide 353.44 353.44 143113 01/06/2011 002664 MARCO INDUSTRIES INC EQUIP REPAIR & MAINT:CSD CAT 40 425.57 425.57 143114 01/06/2011 008864 MEJIA, CARILU refund:sec dep:rm rental:TCC 150.00 150.00 143115 01/06/2011 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS INC. Reimbursements:old town marketing 379.92 Reimbursements:old town marketing 73.22 Jan marketing & promo srvcs:old town 1,500.00 1,953.14 143116 01/06/2011 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE MetLife Dental Insurance Payment 7,594.30 7,594.30 COMPANY 143117 01/06/2011 009541 MEYER AND ASSOCIATES AUG CONSULTING SRVCS:BARN 3,901.99 3,901.99 RELOCATION 143118 01/06/2011 012580 MINUTEMAN PRESS Generic business cards:civic center 45.37 Printed envelopes:business license 783.34 828.71 143119 01/06/2011 001986 MUZAK -SOUTHERN Jan satellite music:old town 72.11 72.11 CALIFORNIA 143120 01/06/2011 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS Auto parts & supplies: Sta 84 17.36 Auto parts & supplies: Sta 84 14.04 31.40 143121 01/06/2011 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION CODE BOOKS:BUILDING & SAFETY 155.56 155.56 ASSN 143122 01/06/2011 000718 NATIONAL RECREATION PARK 3/10-2/11 mbrshp dues:H.Parker 21539 145.00 145.00 ASSOC 143123 01/06/2011 013972 NAT'L PURCHASING 2011 membership dues: M. Vollmuth 90.00 90.00 INSTITUTE,INC Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 143124 01/06/2011 005006 NBS GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 143125 01/06/2011 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES 143126 01/06/2011 013072 NUNEZ, PAUL & MARIA 143127 01/06/2011 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS DIV 143128 01/06/2011 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE (Continued) Description CONT DISCLOSURE RPRTS:CFD 03-02 RORI PAU CONT DISCLOSURE RPTS: VAR. CFD'S Nov advertising:holidays in Old Town Nov advertising: TCSD credit: billing adjustment/TCSD refund:eng grad dep:apn957-170-014 Amount Paid Check Total 125.00 8,109.06 8,234.06 918.53 940.50 -490.50 1,368.53 3,000.00 3,000.00 Misc office supplies:pd old town 612.68 Office supplies: c. museum CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW MAINT CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW MAINT CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW MAINT 143129 01/06/2011 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:Bldg & Safety 143130 01/06/2011 012833 PC MALL GOV, INC. Misc computer supplies:info sys Printer toners & cartridges:info sys Misc computer supplies:info sys 30.30 642.98 3,590.53 86.82 55.00 3,732.35 36.57 36.57 153.71 2,955.59 313.20 3,422.50 143131 01/06/2011 002331 PEP BOYS INC Vehicle Repair & Maint: PW Maint 143.38 143.38 143132 01/06/2011 003200 PIN CENTER, THE City seal lapel pins: city council 681.00 681.00 143133 01/06/2011 011660 PLANNET CONSULTING SEP-NOV CONSULTING SRVCS: CIVIC 1,000.00 1,000.00 CNTR 143134 01/06/2011 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL Var pool supplies: CRC 293.85 293.85 PRODUCTS INC 143135 01/06/2011 013915 PREMIER COMMUNICATIONS Emergency Radios: Citizen Corps. 672.08 672.08 CORP 143136 01/06/2011 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PrePaid Legal Services Payment 324.85 324.85 INC 143137 01/06/2011 013725 PROCRAFT INC RES IMPRV PRGM: RADABAUGH 900.00 900.00 143138 01/06/2011 011751 PUAHI'S POLYNESIAN refund:sec dep:rm rental:TCC 150.00 150.00 DANCERS INC 143139 01/06/2011 013909 R & M DEESE, INC Blue Tattletale Lights:pd traffic 761.80 761.80 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143140 01/06/2011 002612 RADIO SHACK INC Misc computer supplies:info sys 52.13 52.13 143141 01/06/2011 011020 RAGLAND, JACK refund:salsa & bachata 2605.101 50.00 50.00 143142 01/06/2011 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER Dec water meters:30875 rancho vista 414.52 DISTRICT Nov var water meters:TCSD,PW Dec var water meters:Warbler Dr Oct water meters:Wolf Crk Dr N Nov var water meters:Fire Stns Dec var water meters:TCSD svc lev C 1,391.52 2,373.49 134.57 225.74 5,852.12 10,391.96 143143 01/06/2011 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL HERBICIDE APPLICATION: CITY LOTS 10,975.00 10,975.00 MANAGEMENT 143144 01/06/2011 002110 RENTAL SERVICE Rental of tools & maint:pw maint 58.99 58.99 CORPORATION 143145 01/06/2011 004498 REPUBLIC INTELLIGENT Traffic signal repair & maint:PW Traffic 4,630.08 4,630.08 143146 01/06/2011 000266 RIGHTWAY Portable restroom:old town event 10/9 60.88 Portable restroom:old town event 10/8 60.88 121.76 143147 01/06/2011 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS Santa's Parade patrol srvcs 12/3 7,577.68 7,577.68 DEPT 143148 01/06/2011 000220 ROBINSON PRINTING & Printing srvcs:civic center postcard 598.13 598.13 CREATIVE 143149 01/06/2011 004270 RUFFIAN SPECIALTIES Equip repair: stn 84 100.32 100.32 143150 01/06/2011 013827 RYAN MONTELEONE Street drain repair:rainbow cyn 8,500.00 8,500.00 EXCAVATION INC 143151 01/06/2011 008404 SAFE CHECKS Accounts payable checks: finance 1,180.83 1,180.83 143152 01/06/2011 007582 SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION SafeGuard Vision Plan Payment 781.83 781.83 143153 01/06/2011 013169 SCHINSKY, WILLIAM C. Nov exhibit id & cataloging:vail ranch 1,457.00 1,457.00 143154 01/06/2011 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - SUPPORT PAYMENT 725.18 725.18 CENTRAL 143155 01/06/2011 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - SUPPORT PAYMENT 200.00 200.00 CENTRAL Page:7 apChkLst 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 143156 01/06/2011 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL 143157 01/06/2011 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL 143158 01/06/2011 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL 143159 01/06/2011 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC 143160 01/06/2011 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW 143161 01/06/2011 000645 SMART & FINAL INC (Continued) Description SUPPORT PAYMENT SUPPORT PAYMENT SUPPORT PAYMENT Jazz @ the Merc 12/23/10 Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc Public ntc posting srvc xx0241:Planning xx0275:Planning xx0293:Planning xx0263:Planning xx0210 Dec:Pln xx0287:Planning xx0210 Nov:Pln xx0327:Planning xx0345:Planning xx0320:Planning xx0325:Planning xx0194:Planning RECREATION SUPPLIES: C. MUSEUM Misc supplies:emp recognition luncheon MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CNTR GRAND OF MISC SUPPLIES: TREE LIGHTING/CIVIC MISC SUPPLIES:BRKFST W/SANTA RECREATION SUPPLIES: MPSC MISC SUPPLIES: DOG HOUSE PGRM Amount Paid Check Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 521.00 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 148.50 297.00 201.80 483.20 901.78 489.45 288.21 201.13 137.79 100.00 100.00 100.00 521.00 1,930.50 2,703.36 Page apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 143163 01/06/2011 000537 SO CALIF EDISON (Continued) Description Dec 2-31-404-6020:28771 OT frnt st Dec 2-14-204-1615:30027 frnt st rdio Dec 2-31-912-7494:28690 mercedes Dec 2-29-223-8607:42035 2nd st PED Dec 2-31-536-3226:28690 mercedes Dec 2-25-393-4681:41951 moraga rd Dec 2-28-629-0507:30600 pauba rd Dec 2-02-502-8077:43210 bus pk B Dec 2-00-397-5042:43200 bus pk #1 Dec 2-02-351-4946:Senior Center Dec 2-19-171-8568:41970 moreno rd Dec 2-18-937-3152:41950 moreno rd Dec 2-33-056-0681:28912 pujol tpp Dec 2-29-933-3831:43230 bus pk dr Dec 2-20-817-9929:28410 OT frnt st Dec 2-31-536-3481:41902 main st Dec 2-31-419-2873:43000 Hwy 395 Dec 2-29-657-2332:45538 redwood Dec 2-29-953-8082:31523 wolf vly rd Dec 2-29-953-8249:46497 wolf crk Dec 2-29-953-8447:31738 wolf vly rd Dec 2-29-807-1226:28077 diaz PED Dec 2-31-536-3655:41904 main st Dec 2-31-031-2616:27991 diaz PED Dec 2-29-657-2787:41638 winchester Dec 2-31-282-0665:27407 diaz PED Dec 2-00-397-5067:28684 harveston Dec 2-30-520-4414:32781 tem pkwy Dec 2-30-220-8749:45850 N wolf crk Dec 2-29-657-2563:42902 butterfield Dec 2-31-936-3511:46488 pechanga Dec 2-29-458-7548:32000 rncho calif Dec 2-29-295-3510:32211 wolf vly rd Dec 2-29-224-01 73:Fire Stns Dec 2-27-371-8494:42189 winchester Dec 2-32-903-8293:41000 main st Dec 2-21-981-4720:30153 tem pkwy tpp Dec 2-28-904-7706:32329 overind trl Amount Paid Check Total 1,820.78 35.50 1,467.96 526.46 771.39 301.43 5,445.55 1,205.34 4,233.45 753.03 84.82 472.36 125.66 1,593.03 218.44 741.60 22.62 20.38 27.18 24.02 24.02 46.46 954.85 22.57 21.84 24.76 2,047.48 451.09 637.04 179.86 44.40 283.10 1,018.03 2,153.91 26.78 11,675.35 44.48 49.23 39, 596.25 Page9 apChkLst 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 143164 01/06/2011 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 143165 01/06/2011 012087 SODEXO SERVICES 143166 01/06/2011 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 143170 01/06/2011 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 143171 01/06/2011 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 143172 01/06/2011 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CLEANING 143173 01/06/2011 009937 SUPPLY CACHE, THE 143174 01/06/2011 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC 143175 01/06/2011 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS (Continued) Description Dec 095-167-7907-2:30650 pauba rd Dec 101-525-1560-6:27415 enterprise Dec 129-535-4236-7:Civic Center Dec 196-025-0344-3:C. Museum Dec 133-040-7373-0:Maint Fac Dec 181-383-8881-6:Museum Dec 026-671-2909-8:Comm Theater Dec 021-725-0775-4:Senior Center Dec 060-293-3341-3:28922 pujol st Dec 125-244-2108-3:Library Dec 101-525-0950-0:Comm Ctr Dec 129-582-9784-3:43230 bus pk dr Dec 091-085-1632-0:TES pool Dec 091-024-9300-5:30875 rncho vista Nov senior nutrition pgrm: mpsc Pest control srvcs:old town 11/7 Pest control srvcs:harveston park 10/29 Pest control services:O.A.T.C. Dec pest control srvcs: facilities Mandatory Life Insurance Payment Voluntary Supp Life Insurance Payment Carpet & floor maint: theater FIRE EQUIPMENT: PREVENTION Dec sweeping srvcs:parking garage MISC SUPPLIES: C. MUSEUM MISC SUPPLIES: MPSC Misc supplies: Brkfst w/Santa Misc supplies: civic center grand Hospitality supplies: Theater MISC SUPPLIES: CLASSES & ACTIVITIES 143176 01/06/2011 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 Union Dues Payment Amount Paid Check Total 276.55 429.24 3,469.92 98.43 124.68 145.28 513.90 289.96 38.35 536.68 178.64 283.45 15.29 3,538.55 560.00 84.00 84.00 48.00 641.00 9,081.26 653.90 385.00 532.50 500.00 41.52 113.61 152.45 80.99 21.63 30.97 9,938.92 560.00 857.00 9,081.26 653.90 385.00 532.50 500.00 441.17 4,772.00 4,772.00 Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 143177 01/06/2011 012265 TEMECULA ACE HARDWARE hardware supplies:var park sites C/O 143178 01/06/2011 010679 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR/RADIATOR Amount Paid Check Total 169.98 169.98 Vehicle Repair & Maint: Prevention 235.28 Vehicle Maintenance: Sta 84 69.95 Vehicle Repair & Maint: Prevention 235.28 540.51 143179 01/06/2011 010848 TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE Dec lease interior plantscape:library 200.00 200.00 143180 01/06/2011 013973 TEMECULA ROTARY Council Community Service Funding 500.00 500.00 143181 01/06/2011 010493 TEMECULA TOWNE CENTER Jan lease pmt: Police Mall Storefront 1,458.33 1,458.33 ASSOC LP 143182 01/06/2011 011736 TEMECULA TROPHY INC sign for civic center 16.31 16.31 143183 01/06/2011 006325 TEMECULA VALLEY ELKS refund:sec dep:rm rental:CRC 150.00 150.00 #2801 143184 01/06/2011 003067 TEMECULA VALLEY R V Equip repair & maint:police trailers 164.76 164.76 SERVICE 143185 01/06/2011 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON Plumbing supplies: various park sites 43.02 COMPANY Facility supplies: pbsp 410.20 453.22 143186 01/06/2011 009579 THOMAS, LEAH ee computer purchase prgm 2,000.00 2,000.00 143187 01/06/2011 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Jan high speed internet:41000 main st 3,642.75 Jan high speed internet:MPSC 44.95 Jan high speed internet:Library 524.70 Jan high speed internet:42081 main st 58.10 4,270.50 143188 01/06/2011 000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC Volleyball equip parts:CRC gym 114.58 114.58 143189 01/06/2011 001561 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC Dec paging/rental svcs:TCSD, PW 94.92 94.92 143190 01/06/2011 005460 U S BANK TRUSTEE & FISCAL AGENT 2,500.00 2,500.00 SRVCS:CFD 88-12 143191 01/06/2011 011659 ULINE INC Banner shipping boxes: Central Srvcs 200.78 200.78 143192 01/06/2011 011659 ULINE INC Heat sealer equip: Police 142.47 142.47 Pagel 1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143193 01/06/2011 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 62.00 62.00 143194 01/06/2011 008977 VALLEY EVENTS INC EQUIP RENTAL: BRKFST W/SANTA 1,900.00 1,900.00 143195 01/06/2011 004261 VERIZON Dec xxx-9196 TCC-S.A.F.E. 169.60 Dec xxx-3526 gen usage:Fire Alarm 108.21 Dec xxx-2016 gen usage:Reverse 911 121.95 Dec xxx-5706 general usage 144.28 Dec xxx-2676 general usage 36.07 Dec xxx-5696 gen usage:sports comp 36.07 Dec xxx-6400 general usage 98.70 Dec xxx-5275 gen usage:Tem PD DSL 37.21 Dec xxx-0074 general usage 210.76 Dec xxx-6084 general usage 34.96 Dec xxx-3564 general usage 36.07 Dec xxx-0714 gen usage:PD Mall alarm 183.19 1,217.07 143196 01/06/2011 004789 VERIZON ONLINE Dec -Jan Internet svcs:Library 180.09 Dec -Jan Internet svcs:Tem PD DSL 42.99 223.08 143197 01/06/2011 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC Misc maint supplies:civic center 1,706.83 Custodial supplies:civic center 1,730.10 3,436.93 143198 01/06/2011 011740 WEST COAST LIGHTS & equip maint/repair srvcs: Police 23.56 23.56 SIRENS INC 143199 01/06/2011 008530 WITMER ASSOCIATES INC City veh repair & maint: Sta 84 243.93 243.93 143200 01/06/2011 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL Reimb: Team PACE supplies 93.42 93.42 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 686,139.30 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List 01/06/2011 4:23:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 151 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 686,139.30 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1625 01/13/2011 013551 SUMMERHOUSE HOUSING Ph I (20) units/club/pool:Summerhouse 369,592.29 369,592.29 ASSOC 1626 01/13/2011 013984 CHARDONNAY ESCROW I NC 44760 Banana) Way #62 231745 42,800.00 42,800.00 143201 01/11/2011 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY MISC PROMO ITEMS:RECREATION 625.31 625.31 PGRM 143202 01/11/2011 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY embroidery svcs:special events 312.66 312.66 143203 01/11/2011 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY embroidery svcs:special events 699.69 699.69 143204 01/13/2011 013975 28500 PUJOL ST., L.P. refund:eng grad dep:LD03-147GR 995.00 995.00 143205 01/13/2011 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI TCSD instructor earnings 680.00 680.00 143206 01/13/2011 013367 ACTIVE MICRO INC MISC TOOLS/EQUIP: PW TRAFFIC 255.33 MISC TOOLS/EQUIP: PW TRAFFIC 189.87 MISC TOOLS/EQUIP: PW TRAFFIC 54.94 MISC TOOLS/EQUIP: PW TRAFFIC 21.45 MISC TOOLS/EQUIP: PW TRAFFIC 1,352.28 1,873.87 143207 01/13/2011 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL DEC TRAINING: POLICE K-9 RUDY 141.67 INC DEC TRAINING: POLICE K-9 CASPER 141.67 143208 01/13/2011 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES piano tuning: theater 170.00 143209 01/13/2011 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES JAN STAND BY FEE: POLICE 1,248.00 (AFN) DUI & DRUG SCREENINGS: POLICE 410.80 DUI & DRUG SCREENINGS: POLICE 283.34 170.00 410.80 2,069.60 143210 01/13/2011 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC BOTTLED WATER SVCS: CITY 543.52 543.52 FACILITIES 143211 01/13/2011 013976 ARTIGIANO CONSTRUCTION refund:eng grad dep:LD07-077GR 995.00 995.00 INC. 143212 01/13/2011 013983 ARTISAN LEGACY, INC. refund:eng grad dep:LD07-106GR 995.00 995.00 143213 01/13/2011 006594 B B K PERFORMANCE INC refund:eng grad dep:LD05-057GR 995.00 995.00 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143214 01/13/2011 013977 BABB, PAUL M. refund:viol. dismissed:prkg cite #77586 305.00 305.00 143215 01/13/2011 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC (62) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY 1,380.61 1,380.61 143216 01/13/2011 010962 BILBY, DAVID reimb:GFOA/CPFO pgrm fees 590.00 590.00 143217 01/13/2011 005716 BIRTH CHOICE OF TEMECULA Community Service Grant Funding 800.00 800.00 INC 143218 01/13/2011 006908 C C & COMPANY INC santa visit:high hopes dance 150.00 santa visit:mpsc holiday dance 150.00 300.00 143219 01/13/2011 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 214.56 PW patch truck materials 255.55 470.11 143220 01/13/2011 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Dec Copier Lease: Fire 182.55 182.55 INC 143221 01/13/2011 013978 CASSATT ACADEMY refund:eng grad dep:LD06-037GR 995.00 995.00 143222 01/13/2011 000447 COMTRONIX radio/antenna install:civic center 16,902.50 16,902.50 143223 01/13/2011 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & plumbing repair: Stn 84 145.00 145.00 HVAC INC 143224 01/13/2011 008810 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & equip repair/maint:PW Traffic 1,260.64 1,260.64 DATA 143225 01/13/2011 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES JAN LEASE:PD OLD TOWN OFFICE 2,828.70 2,828.70 143226 01/13/2011 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON plotter supplies:info systems 41.33 41.33 COMPANY INC 143227 01/13/2011 001393 DATA TICKET INC Nov citation processing:police 1,337.05 1,337.05 143228 01/13/2011 006392 DAVCON DEVELOPMENT refund:eng grad dep:apn 921-810-032 33,976.80 33,976.80 143229 01/13/2011 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Jan restroom svc: GOHS 52.88 52.88 SRVCS Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 143230 01/13/2011 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD 1,354.42 Fuel for City vehicles: B&S 210.62 Fuel for City vehicles: Code Enf 328.51 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Traffic 122.60 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Lnd Dv 135.96 Fuel for City vehicles: PW CIP 210.85 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Maint 1,826.69 Fuel for City vehicles: Police 72.44 4,262.09 143231 01/13/2011 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Dec water meter:39656 Diego Dr 54.76 54.76 DIST 143232 01/13/2011 005880 EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC. release stop ntc: SW Dirt Exchange 8,921.87 8,921.87 143233 01/13/2011 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY Jan advocacy cnslt: CM 3,500.00 3,500.00 LLC 143234 01/13/2011 009953 FEDERAL CLEANING Jan janitorial svc:pd mall office 625.00 625.00 CONTRACTORS 143235 01/13/2011 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 001060 HYATT RR meaI:NLC cf Denver 11/30-12/2 40.08 001060 HYATT RR htI:NLC cf Denver 11/30-12/2 498.33 006942 ONTARIO AIRPORT RR pkg:NLC cf Denver 11/30-12/2 54.00 006952 PAYPAL GR Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction 59.95 006952 PAYPAL HP Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction 157.60 007744 SUPERSHUTTLE RR shuttle:NLC cf Denver 11/30-12/2 22.00 007592 CAROLS RESTAURANT AT RR meal:Sister City (23) attendees 1,199.76 2,031.72 143236 01/13/2011 011121 FORM BASED CODES regist:weblink 1/1-3/31/11 Lariccia 50.00 50.00 INSTITUTE 143237 01/13/2011 011121 FORM BASED CODES regist:weblink 1/1-3/31 Lariccia 50.00 50.00 INSTITUTE 143238 01/13/2011 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 330383649 2010 Form 592 350.00 350.00 143239 01/13/2011 005311 H2O CERTIFIED POOL WATER Dec water maint: TS Fountain 175.00 SPCL. Dec pool maint svcs:CRC/TES 900.00 1,075.00 143240 01/13/2011 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE misc supplies:OT Boardwalk 356.32 356.32 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143241 01/13/2011 004984 INDEPENDENT ROOFING NOV ROOF INSPECT:CIVIC CENTER 5,516.56 CONSULTANT 11/15-21 ROOF INSPECT:CIVIC CENTER 1,740.00 7,256.56 143242 01/13/2011 013420 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES (1) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY 6.03 INC (2) BOOK PURCHASE: LIBRARY 85.13 91.16 143243 01/13/2011 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT 12/20 doc shred svc: PD Old Town 15.00 15.00 143244 01/13/2011 012295 JAMESON MANAGEMENT INC Garage Door Repair: Stn 73 250.00 250.00 143245 01/13/2011 013077 JONES, DENNIS sttlmnt: performance 12/31 2,725.00 2,725.00 143246 01/13/2011 013979 JOY A DENTAL CORP refund:eng grad dep:LD05-116GR 995.00 995.00 143247 01/13/2011 002531 KATY FM RADIO radio broadcasting: OT Holidays 331.50 broadcast fee: OT Holidays 250.00 581.50 143248 01/13/2011 011910 L H ENGINEERING COMPANY DEC CONST:OLD TOWN STREET 1,760.00 1,760.00 INC IMPROV 143249 01/13/2011 013879 LAKESHORE LEARNING class supplies: tiny tots pgrm 74.27 74.27 MATERIALS 143250 01/13/2011 012065 LANCE, SOLL & LUNGHARD regist:GASB cf 1/26 Oceanside 50.00 50.00 LLC 143251 01/13/2011 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC Medical Supplies: Paramedics 46.32 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 137.58 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 406.43 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 464.65 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 151.62 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 75.81 1,282.41 143252 01/13/2011 013981 LOWRY, DAVID refund:eng dep 30180 Pala Rainbow 995.00 995.00 143253 01/13/2011 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE Dec xxx-0714 gen usage:PD mall alarm 18.75 18.75 143254 01/13/2011 004141 MAINTEX INC Cleaning & maint supplies: city fac's 357.57 357.57 143255 01/13/2011 004307 MARINE BIOCHEMISTS Dec water maint srvcs:Hary/Duck Pond 3,900.00 3,900.00 143256 01/13/2011 013311 MATERIAL HANDLING SUPPLY Forklift maint/repair:pw maint 143.14 143.14 INC Page4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143257 01/13/2011 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC NOV ENG SRVCS: TRAFFIC SIG SYNC 17,957.98 NOV ENG SRVCS:TRAFFIC SIG SYNC 6,802.45 24,760.43 143258 01/13/2011 013390 MILLER, JOSHUA TCSD Instructor Earnings 84.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 143.50 227.50 143259 01/13/2011 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 12/19-1/17 modular rental: OATC 619.88 619.88 143260 01/13/2011 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL 9/26-10/30 CONSULTING:FRENCH 325,020.11 325,020.11 ENGINEERS VLY/I-15 143261 01/13/2011 006077 N T H GENERATION prof services:Civic Center 2,600.00 2,600.00 COMPUTING INC 143262 01/13/2011 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS Auto parts & supplies: Sta 84 75.56 Auto parts & supplies: Sta 84 13.62 Auto parts & supplies: Sta 84 94.31 183.49 143263 01/13/2011 005006 NBS GOVERNMENT FINANCE SPCL TAX ADMIN SRVCS:FINANCE 9,058.27 9,058.27 GROUP DEPT - 143264 01/13/2011 013872 NICHOLS, JANALYNN JOANN Innerstate dance grant recipient 100.00 100.00 143265 01/13/2011 008528 NICHOLS, MELBURG & NOV ENG SRVS:CIVIC CENTER PH II 41,861.78 ROSETTO NOV DSGN SRVCS: PRKG STRUCTURE 7,398.72 NOV ENG SRVS: CIVIC CENTER PH II 569.65 NOV ENG SRVS: CIVIC CENTER PH II 2,160.66 51,990.81 143266 01/13/2011 010273 NIXON PEABODY LLP Feb -Dec '10 legal services 21,747.56 21,747.56 143267 01/13/2011 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Dec advertising: Temecula Presents 331.63 Dec legal advertising: City Clerk/Pln 453.60 785.23 143268 01/13/2011 012833 PC MALL GOV, INC. Misc computer supplies:info sys 119.63 Misc computer supplies:info sys 177.30 296.93 143269 01/13/2011 002498 PETRA GEOTECHNICAL INC Nov geotech srvcs:storm drain impv 2,972.50 2,972.50 143270 01/13/2011 013871 PHAM, JASMINE V. Innerstate dance grant recipient 200.00 200.00 143271 01/13/2011 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL Var pool supplies: citywide 610.84 PRODUCTS INC Var pool supplies: citywide 44.02 654.86 143272 01/13/2011 002185 POSTMASTER Annual PO box fee payment: City Hall 1,160.00 1,160.00 Pages apChkLst 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date 143273 01/13/2011 143274 01/13/2011 143275 01/13/2011 143276 01/13/2011 143277 01/13/2011 143278 01/13/2011 143279 01/13/2011 143280 01/13/2011 143281 01/13/2011 143282 01/13/2011 143283 01/13/2011 143284 01/13/2011 143285 01/13/2011 Vendor 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC 013947 RADOSEVICH, PAULA 013866 RAL INVESTMENT CORP 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR WASH 000271 RBF CONSULTING 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 004498 REPUBLIC INTELLIGENT 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON 008928 RIGEL PRODUCTS & SERVICE 000352 RIVERSIDE CO ASSESSOR 001365 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 143286 01/13/2011 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 143287 01/13/2011 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY (Continued) Description NOV DSGN SRVCS:REDHAWK PARK IMPRV refund:Guitar Lessons 1760.204 Conference table: Civic Center Dec vehicle detailing srvcs:Var.City NOV ENG SRVCS: ULT. INTRCHG OCT ENG SRVCS: ULT. INTRCHG concrete mixer: PW Maint Equipment rental: TCSD Maint Install traffic signal pole: PW Nov 2010 legal services credit:billing adj/lack of documentation Equip repair & maint:pw maint Sept- Nov assessor maps: b&s dept. food handler's permit: O.T. holiday '10 Jazz @ the Merc 12/3/10 MISC SUPPLIES: DOG HOUSE PROGRAM MISC SUPPLIES: DOG HOUSE PROGRAI` MISC SUPPLIES: DOG HOUSE PROGRAI` Dec 2-30-066-2889:30051 rancho vista Dec 2-29-807-1093:28079 Diaz PED Dec 2-27-805-3194:Comm Theater Dec 2-29-479-2981:31454 Tem Pkwy Dec 2-31-031-2590:28301 rncho cal Dec 2-05-791-8807:31587 Tem Pkwy FY 10/11 emissions fee: Stn 84 Amount Paid Check Total 1,261.20 15.00 7,323.06 63.00 121,833.79 112,865.13 2,990.63 50.03 4,300.98 154,762.99 -622.45 82.71 27.00 177.00 513.00 72.12 112.54 134.72 23.30 22.77 3,198.90 127.39 60.50 7,876.34 109.00 1,261.20 15.00 7,323.06 63.00 234,698.92 3,040.66 4,300.98 154,140.54 82.71 27.00 177.00 513.00 319.38 11, 309.20 FY 10/11 operating fee: Stn 84 293.21 402.21 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143288 01/13/2011 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST Dec pest control services: Stn 92 42.00 CONTROL INC Pest control services: Duck Pond 73.00 115.00 143289 01/13/2011 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Jan gen usage:0141,0839,2593,9306 507.49 507.49 143290 01/13/2011 002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS Audio srvcs:Old Town events 12/31 675.00 675.00 143291 01/13/2011 008023 STATER BROTHERS MARKETS refreshments: CERT Training 153.74 Rfrshmnts: Dinner w/Fire Fighters prgm 47.20 200.94 143292 01/13/2011 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD MISC SUPPLIES: CLASSES & 47.36 SRVCS ACTIVITIES Hospitality supplies: Theater 50.53 MISC SUPPLIES: SKATE PARK 65.02 162.91 143293 01/13/2011 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL Display:civic center reception/sunshine 188.09 188.09 143294 01/13/2011 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS City vehicle repair & maint: Police 201.44 LLC City vehicle repair & maint: Police 108.74 City vehicle repair & maint: Police 73.77 383.95 143295 01/13/2011 004209 TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY Oct -Dec bus bench install & maint:PW 3,000.00 3,000.00 FOUND. 143296 01/13/2011 011736 TEMECULA TROPHY INC Emp recognition awards:HR 593.72 Recognition awards:csd 561.15 1,154.87 143297 01/13/2011 009194 TEMECULA VALLEY NEWS Dec advertising: Temecula Presents 143.20 143.20 143298 01/13/2011 003067 TEMECULA VALLEY R V Equip repair & maint: Police 1,473.39 SERVICE Equip repair & maint: Police 481.11 1,954.50 143299 01/13/2011 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith srvcs: civic center 200.00 CENTR Locksmith srvcs: civic center 252.91 452.91 143300 01/13/2011 003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY Emp recognition awards:HR 4,009.48 4,009.48 143301 01/13/2011 003862 THYSSENKRUPP Elevator repair & maint:foc 148.50 148.50 ELEVATOR.BRNCH 37 143302 01/13/2011 013974 TORRES, CASSANDRA refund:Tiny Tots 1040.104 56.00 56.00 143303 01/13/2011 013980 TORRES, RAMSES refund:eng grad dep:LD06-152GR 995.00 995.00 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143304 01/13/2011 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE Misc traffic control supplies: PW Maint 43.23 INC Misc traffic control supplies: PW Maint Misc traffic control supplies: PW Maint Misc traffic control supplies: PW Maint 143305 01/13/2011 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE Dec undrgrnd svcs alert tickets:PW ALERT 143306 01/13/2011 004261 VERIZON Dec xxx-0049 gen usage:Comerchero Jan xxx-0590 gen usage:TCC alarm Jan xxx-7530 gen usage:Library Jan xxx-5180 gen usage:79S Irrig ctr Dec xxx-1999 general usage 66.61 1,496.84 1,496.84 225.00 37.34 82.43 367.25 40.83 40.73 3,103.52 225.00 568.58 143307 01/13/2011 004789 VERIZON ONLINE Jan SW DSL:PD:Jones, C. 39.95 39.95 143308 01/13/2011 012292 VIAMEDIA INC Dec cable commercial:Old Town holiday 3,162.00 3,162.00 143309 01/13/2011 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLI ES: 654.02 C.MUS/THTR/PARKS Custodial supplies: civic center 723.38 Custodial supplies: civic center 728.26 Custodial supplies: var.city fac's 3,244.99 5,350.65 143310 01/13/2011 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 11/16-30 tree trimming srvcs:pw maint 7,240.00 11/1-15 tree trimming srvcs:csd 1,780.00 Tree trimming & removal:signet 432.00 9,452.00 143311 01/13/2011 000339 WEST PUBLISHING CORP CA Penal Code '11 pamphlets: Police 180.79 180.79 143312 01/13/2011 013556 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL ret. w/h pmt: civic center -9,629.39 AUDIO/VISUAL INTEGRATION:CIVIC CEN 96,293.99 86,664.60 143313 01/13/2011 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE Dec '10 TUMF Payment 275,063.00 275,063.00 COUNCIL OF 143314 01/13/2011 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE Dec '10 MSHCP payment 60,078.00 60,078.00 COUNTY 143315 01/13/2011 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC Nov engineering srvs:pw traffic 2,080.00 2,080.00 143316 01/13/2011 000230 WILLDAN FINANCIAL Jan -Mar assessment eng srvcs:csd 5,666.65 5,666.65 SERVICES 143317 01/13/2011 004567 WITCHER ELECTRIC Electrical repair:rrsp ballfield 1,680.00 1,680.00 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 143318 01/13/2011 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Medical Supplies: Paramedics 1,305.00 Medical Supplies: Paramedics 893.21 2,198.21 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 1,856,682.79 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List 01/13/2011 1:44:04PM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 120 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,856,682.79 Pagel 0 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Approval of the fiscal year 2011-12 Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TVTBID) Advisory Board's Annual Report and Levy of an Assessment against Lodging Businesses within the TVTBID for fiscal year 2011-12 PREPARED BY: David Bilby, Senior Debt Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF BACKGROUND: In December of 2005, the City Council took the necessary actions and formed the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TVTBID), Chapter 3.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code, to promote tourism in the Temecula Valley at the request of all the lodging businesses within the City. Thereafter, the City Council was authorized to undertake proceedings to annually levy assessments against lodging businesses within the TVTBID pursuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989. On November 24, 2009, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with the preparation of a Resolution of Intention to increase the Assessment rate on all lodging businesses within the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District from 2% to 4% of the rent charged by the operator per occupied room per night. On January 12, 2010, the City Council amended Section 3.40.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code increasing the assessment from 2% to 4% for all lodging businesses within the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District. The primary purpose of the 4% assessment is to provide sufficient funding to support marketing activities promoting tourism for all lodging businesses in the District. As annually required, staff has prepared the necessary resolutions to approve the Annual Report and set a Public Hearing on the assessments, staff will prepare a final resolution confirming the assessments for fiscal year 2011-2012 to be brought forward at the scheduled Public Hearing on February 8, 2011. At the Public Hearing, testimony may be heard and protests may be made by any person with an interest in the proposed levy. After the Public Hearing, and in the absence of a majority protest, staff will proceed to levy the assessment for the fiscal year 2011-12 (March 1, 2011 through February 28, 2012) as authorized by City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that the 4% annual assessment will result in the collection of approximately $939,087 in fiscal year 2011-12 which would be used by the CONVIS for the promotion of tourism. The City would receive up to 2% of the assessments, or approximately $18,782, to offset administrative costs. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 11 - Resolution No. 11 - Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Report — Budget and Marketing Plan Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Report — Budget and Marketing Plan Bureau 2010-2011 Annual Bureau 2011-2012 Annual RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: A. The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., (the "Law") authorizes the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council") to annually levy an assessment against businesses within a business improvement area for the purpose of promoting tourism, which is in addition to any assessments, fees, charges or taxes imposed in the City of Temecula (the "City"). B. Pursuant to the Law, the City Council enacted Chapter 3.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code, establishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District in the City (the "TVTBID"). C. The Law requires the City Council to appoint an advisory board which shall prepare an annual report for each fiscal year for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the activities described in the report and which shall make recommendations to the City Council on the expenditure of revenues derived from the levy of assessments, on the classification of businesses, as applicable, and on the method and basis of levying the assessments. D. By Resolution No. 05-121, the City Council appointed the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board to serve as the advisory board for the TVTBID (the "Advisory Board"). E. In accordance with Section 36533 of the Law, the Advisory Board has prepared and filed with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council, a report for fiscal year 2011-12 in connection with the proposed levy of an assessment against lodging businesses within the TVTBID entitled, "Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District 2011-12 Annual Marketing Plan Budget and Marketing Plan" (the "Report") and, by previous resolution, the City Council preliminarily approved the Report as filed. Section 2. The City Council has examined and reviewed the Report, and such report is hereby preliminarily approved as filed. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify to the vote adopting this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2011. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., (the "Law") authorizes the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council") to annually levy an assessment against businesses within a business improvement area for the purpose of promoting tourism, which is in addition to any assessments, fees, charges or taxes imposed in the City of Temecula (the "City"). Section 2. That pursuant to the Law, the City Council enacted Chapter 3.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code establishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District in the City (the "TVTBID"). Section 3. That the Law requires the City Council to appoint an advisory board which shall prepare an annual report for each fiscal year for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the activities described in the report and which shall make recommendations to the City Council on the expenditure of revenues derived from the levy of assessments, on the classification of businesses, as applicable, and on the method and basis of levying the assessments. Section 4. By Resolution No. 05-121, the City Council appointed the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board to serve as the advisory board for the TVTBID (the "Advisory Board"). Section 5. In accordance with Section 36533 of the Law, the Advisory Board has prepared and filed with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council, a report for fiscal year 2011-12 in connection with the proposed levy of an assessment against lodging businesses within the TVTBID entitled, "Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District 2011-12 Annual Marketing Plan Budget and Marketing Plan" (the "Report") and, by previous resolution, the City Council preliminarily approved the Report as filed. Section 6. The boundaries of the TVTBID are the boundaries of the City, and include all lodging businesses therein. Section 7. The City Council hereby declares its intention, in addition to any assessments, fees, charges or taxes imposed by the City, to levy and collect an assessment against lodging businesses within the TVTBID boundaries pursuant to the Law for fiscal year 2011-12 (March 1, 2011 to February 28, 2012). Such assessment is not proposed to increase from the assessment levied and collected in the TVTBID for fiscal year 2010-11. The proposed fiscal year 2011-12 TVTBID assessment is to be levied on all lodging businesses, defined in Temecula Municipal Code Section 3.40.020 to mean hotels, motels, and bed and breakfasts as defined in Temecula Municipal Code Section 3.20.040, within the TVTBID boundaries based upon four percent (4%) of the rent charged by the operator per occupied room per night. Extended stays, defined as stays of more than 30 consecutive calendar days, and those exempt persons, as defined in Municipal Code Section 3.20.040, will be exempt from the levy of the assessment. The assessments will not be included in gross room rental revenue for the purpose of determining the amount of the Transient Occupancy Tax imposed pursuant to Chapter 3.20 of the Municipal Code. New lodging businesses established within the boundaries of the TVTBID after the beginning of the 2011-12 fiscal year will not be exempt from the levy of the fiscal year 2011-12 assessment. The assessment shall be collected in monthly installments as set forth in Chapter 3.40 of the Municipal Code. Section 8. The revenues raised from the levy and collection of the assessment shall be used for marketing and promotions to increase tourism and market the Temecula Valley area as a tourist destination that benefits lodging businesses located and operating within the boundaries of the TVTBID as provided for in Chapter 3.40 of the Municipal Code, and shall not be used for any other purposes. The City shall retain two percent (2%) of the collected revenues to pay for collecting the assessments and administering the TVTBID. Section 9. The City Council hereby fixes the time and place for a public hearing on the proposed levy of the fiscal year 2011-12 assessment against lodging businesses within the TVTBID as follows: Time: 7:00 p.m. Date: February 8, 2011 Place: City of Temecula City Council Chambers 41000 Main Street Temecula, California. Section 10. At the public hearing the testimony of all interested persons regarding the levy of the assessment within the TVTBID for fiscal year 2011-12 will be heard. A protest may be made orally or in writing at the public hearing. A. Any protest pertaining to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceedings shall be in writing and clearly state the irregularity or defect to which objection is made. B. Every written protest must be filed with the City Clerk at or before the time fixed herein for the public hearing. Written protests may be delivered or mailed to the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. C. The City Council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any written protest and at the public hearing may correct minor defects in the proceedings. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. D. Each written protest must contain a written description of the business in which the person signing the protest is interested, sufficient to identify the business and its address. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official records of the City as the owner of the business, then the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the business. If the owner of the business is a corporation, LLC, partnership or other legal entity, the authorized representative for the entity shall be authorized to sign the protest. Section 11. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record, written protests (submitted and not withdrawn) by the owners of the businesses within the TVTBID that will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total assessments of the entire TVTBID, no further proceedings to levy the proposed fiscal year 2011-12 assessment, as contained in this Resolution, shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the City Council. If the majority of written protests is only as to an improvement or activity proposed, then that type of improvement or activity shall not be included in the TVTBID. Section 12. Further information regarding the TVTBID may be obtained from the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. For a full and detailed description of the boundaries of the TVTBID, the activities to be provided for fiscal year 2011-12 and the proposed fiscal year 2011-12 assessment, reference is hereby made to the Report of the Advisory Board. The Report is on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection. Section 13. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least seven days before the hearing. Section 14. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify to the vote adopting this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2011. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk 1111111111010000VOMIIVIIIIIIIIIIIII„, 11. "w MO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WINE COUNTRY Convention andI Visitors Bureau 2011-2012 marketing plan TVTBID budget and marketing plan Mar 11 - Feb 12 O CO CO 0 W 4) 0 N 0 N 0 CO 0 4) O f0 MV V O co 0) O^ O O O O C CD O V f0 1' V 0) f0 0) 1'- 4) O W s- 0 e- 47 1'- N O eF N M CO 4) 47 4) 0 CO 0 0 0 01 F- 1� N CO O V CO 0 CO O W 4] V CO W N 0 W N. O N O CO. N r m N N V V 4) N OI� 4) 4) 0 CO 0 CO 0 O) CO CO W W N V (00000(0 V W CO 0 W t` O O N O CO (71 ti N a- N N r V r V 4) N N CO 4) O4) 0 CO 0 CO 01 O CO 00(4) a (0000(0 et 0 O f� N N O N n " m ° O N N N M N M V N N CO N N N O 4) 4) 0 CO 0 CO 0 0) M CO O N 0 V CO 0 CO 0 W 4) V CO M 41 N + O 0 4) O N N O CO N O 4) .- N '7 r V LO [V W M N h N N- CD (00(0005(00)0)0 I� W 4) V CO 0 CO 0 0 1' V CO 4) O W W O 0) 0 1- O 4) CO O W N U 4) t` N r — V — V 4) N CO M N W O 4) O4) O O 4) O 01 CO CO M 4--• 0 CO `71-- M O V 0 O 4) V M 1-- c7 N N N 0 CO O O 4) No 00 N O) 4) N 4) N m W CO M V V h 4) )) O 4) O co O M O V CO CO O LO O O V coO coO N 50 N M "i:. - N V O 1-- CO 1-- O 4) N of CON N N N a 4) N Q V N I� N O 4) O co 0 0 0 V CO CO 4) 4) 0) O V (0000(0(0(0(0 ID N W 0 0 1� 0 4) N V CO N 0 W V N �- 1' V 4) N 0) M N I'IW 11') O 0C0 O co O N O V W ti .--.. N W N V M O CO O O If) N W N W CO CO O V W N O W N V N 4) W V N N V V W N O) co N W 0) 0 0 4) 0 CO 0 V 4) V M N N co co O V CO O W 0 CO I-- N M M N O M M O 4) CO N.- CI Cl. CO V CO. N q . V N N r 1,` r V 4) N I m W a V M O •-- O IMO l00 N M O W N W O N 4) O O 4) N V CO CO M N N. V 4) N W CO M 171 0 t0 d 0 0 O r N o!I C O C 0 O U m > 0 m 7N C 0— E�1L 01 0 N I- I� M 4) 4) O O M O 4) O V M 0) N O N V f0 O CO O CO 4) 1-- CO 0 I� 545 N M O W t` O CO N 47 CO O 4I ' r N M r 1� r V 4) N W N N Total Income Dues & Subscriptions FAM Tours/Site Visits Event Hosting Office Supplies Personnel Costs Professional Fees Promotional Items Trade Show Participation Travel & Entertainment Total Expenses J 0 0 0 0 m 0 O 0 c 0 0 O U 0 0 D)� > 0 0 N CO LL 0 0 r 0 � e FmNm C7 Mar 11-Feb 12 O O 0 0 0 0 (0 0) CO f0 N 0 0 O 0 CO 0 O 0 t0 0 O LO 00 t0 O O CO 0 0 0 1 P) 10 r r x r x . 0 r 1 r- r r In csi 6 01 CVO O cocc* V V 01 co O co m 0 0 0 O CO ▪ • 0 O CO o M coo O O o (0 0 0 r 0 n M O O 10 oLCn 0 PI 0 - CO o VI 0 0 0 Oo co co O O 00 CO0 CO O CO M • 0 Cr O 1? O O CO o co o cc co O co ▪ n O r m r r O co ▪ O W O M ▪ O O O O 10 o O co • co O O O 0Li 0D Advertising - Website 0 9 0 LL Investment Revenue Membership Dues 0 1) vJ t? -4 0 m L 0 2 Sales -Publications co V 1 o IO M CO co 0) V o 0 )- M N ) o n c 0 LO 1- mco co a 0 CO C•I CO LO N 0 r 0) n n n ) 1 1 co r a Ln • V 10 L') CO 5) 0— 0) M000_ 1 10 1 CO r e d CO 1 IL) (0 cn co 0) 0 00 (1) CD i r M 1 0 n 03 f 1 CO 1 CO CO r0 N IL) 111 0 1 m r 1 1 CO Lo r- LO O ▪ • 1 1 r r 0 1 m 0- 1 M O 0) CO CO 0 CO 0) MN 4 r r a 0 n C0') r 1 1 0) 1 0 0) 1)) m m ro o Total Income Advertising -Website Dues & Subscriptions Event Hosting, Industry Sales Event Hosting, Local Community CV CV 0 n * + CO 0 N 0 Office Supplies Personnel Costs Professional Fees Promotional Items Operating Cost Telecommunications Travel & Entertainment 10 co0 co 0 0) <0n 10 CO co 0 0 Total Expenses Net Income `Proposed -Pending final confirmation of Pechanga Partnership Q 0 1 - Mar 11 - Feb 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Income Advertising-CIty Brochure/Rack Service FAM Tours/Site Visits Trade Show Participation 0 0 0 0 0 Total Expense Net Income *Proposed -Pending approval of continued City Partnership Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Section IX Marketing Opportunity B Target Markets A. Temecula Valley Marketing Opportunity If the newly formed visitors bureau and the community can consistently increase room sales through the TVCVB's leadership and expanded marketing efforts, there can be significant revenue growth. Following are two scenarios based on 5 year projections that outline potential Retum on Investment (ROI) by the TVCVB's efforts. Scenario 1: Moderate Growth Scenario • Minimal new inventory is added. • Average Daily Rate increases at 3% annually. • Occupancy increases at approximately 1.5% annually, Scenario 2: Aggressive Growth • Minimal new inventory is added. • Average Daily Rate increases at 3% annually„ • Occupancy increases at about 3% annually. Scenario 1 5 Year Projection Hotel Rooms 1,666 1,766 1,866 Rooms Available 608,090 644,590 681,090 Occupancy 72% 73.5% 75.0% Rooms Sold 437,825 473,774 510,818 Incremental Rooms 0 35,949 37,044 ADR $100 $103.00 $106.09 Incremental Revenue $3,702,731.55 $3,929,982.05 Incremental Cost $437,825 $473,774 ROI $8.5 $8.3 Scenario 2 5 Year Projection Hotel Rooms 1,666 1,766 1,866 Rooms Available 608,090 644,590 681,090 Occupancy 72% 75.0% 78.0% Rooms Sold 437,825 483,443 531,250 Incremental Rooms 0 45,618 47,808 ADR $100 $103.00 $106.09 Incremental Revenue $4,698,623.10 $5,071,918.89 Incremental Cost $437,825 $483,443 ROI $10.7 $10.5 8MG 1,966 717,590 76.5% 548,956 38,139 $109.27 $4,167,535.11 $510,818 $8.2 1,966 717,590 81.0% 581,248 49,998 $109.27 $5,463,383.67 $531,250 $10.3 2,066 754,090 78.0% 588,190 39,234 $112.55 $4,415,804.38 $548,956 $8.0 2,066 754,090 84.0% 633,436 52.188 $112.55 $5,873,771.61 $581,248 $10.1 2,166 790,590 79.5% 628,519 40,329 $115.93 $4,675,219.03 $588,190 $7.9 2,166 790,590 87.0% 687,813 54,378 $115.93 $6,303,865.78 $633,436 $10.0 It should be noted that in either scenario it will be important for the destination to increase overall demand and focus TCVCB efforts to that end. Given Temecula Valley's new and exciting position in the marketplace, these scenarios may be understating the potential. On the other hand, acts of terrorism, economic uncertainty, increased competition as well as other issues may have a dramatic and negative impact on either scenario. 52 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan B. Target Markets 1. Geographic Markets Temecula Valley has excellent proximity to three major population markets including Orange County, Los Angeles and San Diego. Temecula Valley should focus on stimulating ovemight visits from FIT, group and business travelers originating from Orange County. Additionally San Diego and Los Angeles because of its close proximity offers significant opportunity. In addition to overnight leisure travelers from these markets it is believed that Temecula Valley also offers enough distance for business travelers and meeting and convention attendees to generate overnight stays. Based on information collected in the destination, the following target market summary for Orange County, San Diego and Los Angeles has been developed. 2004 Median Age 2004 Average Age Median Household Income Average Household Income Per capita income Casino Gambling Any casino gambling Activities on Domestic Vacation General sightseeing Attend event Shopping Play golf Bicycling Running/jogging Other outdoor sport/recreation Visit relatives/friends Visit spa Activities Participation in General Attend Arts & Cultural Events Gourmet Cooking/Fine Foods Bicycle frequently Golf Running/Jogging Wines Source: PCensus Table 12 Target Market Size and Characteristics Orange County 34.6 35.3 $63,748 $83,329 $27,722 San Diego Los Angeles 34.1 32.6 35 33 $50,995 $42,632 $67,814 $61,812 $24,651 $20,349 216,592 21.9% I 220,844 20.80% 643,613 458,058 20.8% 429,784 13.0% 1,261,120 179,461 8.2% 176,695 8.0% 503,683 332,413 15.1% 321,700 14.6% 925,514 65,299 3.0% 61,757 2.8% 168,025 48,059 2.2% 45,515 2.1% 111,963 35,262 1.6% 33,870 1.5% 91,635 165,907 7.5% 152,725 7.0% 445,928 330,289 15.0% 323,382 15.0% 936,532 32,339 1.5% 28,748 1.3% 809,569 (Households) 231,220 238,864 268,483 237,908 184,403 227,398 2420.0% 232,161 22.0% 1,201,130 2500.0% 240,343 23.5% 1,254,752 2800.0% 262,843 25.7% 1,388,807 2490.0% 204,547 20.0% 1,002,729 1930.0% 207,615 20.0% 975,918 2300.0% 219,888 4.5% 1,072,438 19.8% 17.4% 6.9% 12.7% 2.3% 1.5% 1.3% 6.1% 12.9% 1.1% 22% 23.40% 25.90% 18.70% 18.20% 20% As illustrated in the above table, in addition to high household incomes, each of these markets have a propensity to gamble, golf, enjoy wines, shop and attend arts and cultural events which include all the elements found in Temecula Valley. 53 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Despite the size of these markets it is clear that Temecula valley does not have the financial resources to adequately cover all of the markets with media alone. As such the following table is developed to show the range of marketing options that might be used in each market. The bureau may choose to emphasize different tools and different levels depending upon the opportunity It should be noted that while the primary source of Temecula Valley's visitors arrive by automobile, there is significant air access into Ontario Airport with Southwest Airlines being the dominant carrier with approximately 50% of the passenger arrival market share. This offers excellent long-term potential for both group and FIT travel as Southwest provides access from a variety of Califomia markets. Illustrated below, Southwest Airlines is the dominant carrier that services the Ontario Airport. Table 13 Ontario Airport Carrier Market Share Airline Carrier Market Share Southwest 49% Delta 8.3% American West 7.3% American Airlines 7.2% United 5.B% Alaska 4.3% Continnental 3.8% Skywest 3.4% Northwest 2.5% Horizon Air 2.4% Other 5.2% Source: Ontario Airport 54 Orange County Los Angeles San Diego 1 Group 2, FIT Target Segments 1. Group 2, FIT 1. Group 2, FIT Marketing Tools Media Public Relations Promotions Sales Special Events Public Relations Promotions Sales Special Events Public Relations Promotions Sales Special Events It should be noted that while the primary source of Temecula Valley's visitors arrive by automobile, there is significant air access into Ontario Airport with Southwest Airlines being the dominant carrier with approximately 50% of the passenger arrival market share. This offers excellent long-term potential for both group and FIT travel as Southwest provides access from a variety of Califomia markets. Illustrated below, Southwest Airlines is the dominant carrier that services the Ontario Airport. Table 13 Ontario Airport Carrier Market Share Airline Carrier Market Share Southwest 49% Delta 8.3% American West 7.3% American Airlines 7.2% United 5.B% Alaska 4.3% Continnental 3.8% Skywest 3.4% Northwest 2.5% Horizon Air 2.4% Other 5.2% Source: Ontario Airport 54 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strata9lc tarketing Elan In terms of access markets, there are 51 daily non-stop flights between Oakland, Sacramento and San Jose into Ontario Airport with approximately 6,987 seats. This frequency and capacity offers Temecula Valley significant long-term growth opportunities. Table 14 Southwest Non -Stop Flights From Selected Markets Market FIIghtslDay Est Seats Oakland Sacramento San Jose Source; Sosrlliwwesl Airlines ItAip 2,603 7' 55 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan 2. Target Segments With regards to target markets, the TVCVB should target leisure (FIT) and group travelers as indicated below. A. FIT Travelers Based upon Temecula Valley's easily accessible location and wide range of activities, the following leisure segments should be targeted: • Youth (25-34) • Baby Boomers (35-54) • Active Mature Adults (55+) o Vacation/Getaway It should be noted that these targeted age groups of leisure travelers are highly receptive to visiting destinations that are convenient "easy to get to" getaways which Temecula Valley epitomizes. B. Groups While the individual properties and attractions primarily target their efforts at leisure travelers, the TVCVB will optimize its marketing efforts and resources by focusing on group and business travelers that can generate business for the destination during the mid -week. Following is a list of potential groups that should be targeted by the TVCVB: • Corporate & Incentive — (30-40%) Sales and reward based meetings • SMERF — (30-40%) Sports, Military, Educational, Religious and Fraternal groups • Associations — (10-20%) State or National Associations 56 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Section X Marketing Strategies In order to achieve its stated goals and to establish an effective long-term competitive advantage, the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau must successfully implement three core strategies. These include destination branding, differentiating the destination, and facilitating the conversion of mid week room sales by the private sector. Temecula Valley Core Strategies A. BrandinglPositioning 1. AIDA (Awareness, Interest, Desire and Action) Being a new destination, Temecula Valley must create awareness and desire (by implement steps outlined in the advertising action plan) among its identified target segments. The basic AIDA model of Awareness, Interest, Desire and Action is one that can conceptually guide the marketing and sales efforts of the organization. Awareness Create Awareness of Temecula Valley, Interest Develop Interest in Temecula Valley. Desire Create Desire to visit Temecula Valley. Action Instill Action to visit Temecula Valley. The TVCVB needs to see its efforts as impacting the market through each of the above steps. This process should be viewed as strategic in nature since it takes time to build a brand. It is critical to understand that brand building is essentail for both FIT and group travel. Both segments have to have awareness and a positive perception of the destination in order to take action to visit the area. 57 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan 2. Brand Identity A brand is the way in which visitors perceive or distinguish a destination. Temecula Valley's brand, "Where you want to be...", helps to promote one, all-inclusive identity that integrates all of the destination's primary attributes — wine, history, golf, gaming, events - to create an indelible impression in the mind of the consumer. A brand not only serves to unify all of the assets/attributes of a destination under one identity. It also works to unify the community and encourage it to provide the highest quality standards and customer service that will further strengthen the brand and customer loyalty. 3. Brand Awareness and Customer Loyalty As time becomes increasingly scarce, consumers will first tum to highly visible brand names when planning a purchase. Consumers want an assurance of quality when they don't have the time, opportunity or ability to inspect alternatives. This positive behavior is reinforced by the constant visibility of a brand using mediums and communication efforts that reach the target segment. A brand representing leadership, success, quality and excitement can create a genuine connection with the consumer. Temecula Valley: "Where you want to be..." Wine • History • Golf • Gaming • Events Target Market Segments Brand Awareness: Educate Target Segments via TVCVB Communications Brand Recognition: Familiarity of the Temecula Valley brand leads to Recall & Preference These positive associations can motivate a buying decision that is both emotionally and functionally driven and is positively reinforced when the experience meets the expectation. As such, y r *VV'Wly the Temecula Valley CVB, lodging properties, attractions and all visitor oriented businesses should strive to consistently offer exceptional customer service ( by continually emphasizing service and developing effective customer service programs) beginning with the information gathering process to the actual visitor experience. The continual and dedicated commitment by each community member, TVCVB and business to provide a positive overall experience will help to build brand awareness, reinforce positive brand associations, and generate customer (brand) loyalty among target segments. Above all, a highly loyal customer base can be expected to generate repeat visitations and revenue flow. To effectively communicate the key benefits of visiting the destination, the Temecula Valley brand needs to be continually promoted in all marketing initiatives. As such, it is critical that the key points of differentiation that help to build the Temecula Valley brand continue to be interwoven and communicated through all aspects of the TVCVB and the private sector marketing efforts over the long-term. With only a limited budget (even with the added BID funds), the TVCVB can increase the visibility of its brand through the following marketing and promotional initiatives: o TVCVB website and collateral materials. o Logo exposure on all partner (private sector) promotional pieces, i.e., website, signage, brochures, etc. o Strategic partnerships with public and private sector inside and outside of Temecula Valley. o Public relations efforts that are targeted at key market segments and media. o Sales activities that represent the destination. 58 Temecula Valley Convention and Visite Bureau 4. Brand Extension SMG sees the opportunity to extend the existing Temecula Valley brand to a variety of market segments. Core Brand: "Where you want to be...Temecula Valley." Brand Extensions by Segment: Goff Temecula Valley. "The place you want to golf:"' Meetings Temecula Valley. "The place you want to meet." 5lrateglc Mn€ketk g Flan Leisure Temecula Valley. "The place you want to play: 59 Ter ula Valley Ccnvertion and Visitrtis bureau Strategic Marketing Pian B. Differentiate the Destination Part of successfully building the Temecula Valley brand and destination awareness is to clearly differentiate the experience in the mind of consumers and key group leaders, As such, Temecula Valley should differentiate its offerings from the competition through an emphasis of its key tourism assets, translating them into believable and meaningful benefits for its new and repeat target market segments. Key Points of Differentiation Tourism Asset: New Southern California Destination Consumer Benefit: New Experience As a burgeoning new destination tucked away in southwest California, Temecula Valley has the perfect blend of rural charm and metropolitan excitement unlike any other location in Southern California. This unique "boutique destination" offers award-winning wineries, diverse accommodations and group facilities, cultural events, 24-hour gaming and entertainment, and championship golf to suit a wide variety of preferences and budgets for leisure and business travelers, Weather Comfortable Environment Temecula Valley's geographic location provides idyllic weather with abundant sunshine and cool ocean breezes while the coast can be foggy and inland locations can be muggy smoggy and often oppressively hot. Easy Access Convenience, Easy to get to Highway access via Interstate 15 conveniently links Orange, Riverside and San Diego counties and all parts north to Temecula Valley, Additionally, Temecula Valley is located 1-1/2 hours away from four major airports making it easy to get to for out of state travelers as well. Southern California Wine Destination World -Class Wine Tasting As the only wine producing region in Southern California, Temecula Valley offers over 20 award-winning wineries set in an exquisite setting for the large Southern California populations to visit. Pechanga Resort & Casino 24-hour Entertainment The all-inclusive Pechanga Resort & Casino with its headline entertainment, 7 restaurants, 522 rooms and 200,000 square feet of casino provides 24-hour, Las Vegas -style gaming opportunities and excitement. Preserved Heritage Educational, Culture. History Temecula's Old Town features rich historical sites including several historical buildings, the Temecula Valley Museum, and over 640 antique dealers providing an educational and cultural experience that helps to tell the valley's distinctive and illustrious story. Special Events Culture, Attractions, Family -Oriented Temecula Valley boasts several year-round special events that have become major attractions for visitors of all ages. Many promote the area's arts and culture as well as primary tourism assets such as the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival and the Temecula International Film & Music Festival, 60 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategng Plan C. Generate Room Nights As was identified previously in this plan. the TVCVB is accountable for increasing room nights specifically in the mid week time frame and to a lesser degree on the weekends. To that end, the TVCVB must focus its efforts and measurements on activities that will generate the targeted room nights. Within this core strategy there are several key steps the TVCVB can take to ensure it focuses on generating room nights. 1. Target the Group Segment. As was identified in a number of community interviews, many felt the TVCVB should focus on generating mid week demand with targeted efforts at the group segment. As such, the TVCVB must develop targeted programs designed to attract this key segment. As was also identified in this plan, a 5 point increase in mid week occupancy could lead to approximately $2 million+ in lodging revenue alone. This, in turn, should also stimulate demand and revenues for the other parts of the tourism economy within the greater Temecula Valley area. 2. Increase Overnight visitation from Orange County and San Diego FIT visitors. In addition to attracting groups as a core strategy to increase occupancy levels, the TVCVB and the local community must develop and implement programs to increase overnight visitation from Orange County and San Diego. Develop Strategic Programs with Southwest Airlines via Ontario Airport. Another effective strategy to increase visitation is the longer term potential that Southwest Airlines offers. As was identified earlier in this report, the Ontario Airport provides a credible access option for both FIT and group travel to Temecula Valley. Given that Southwest Airlines is the dominant carrier, it is natural to seek out and develop a partnership with the carrier. 4. Drive Traffic via the Internet As can be seen below s core strategy to drive room night si through the website, the model below illustrates how all of the marketing efforts work together to do this. Competitive Strategy Sales [uuu_ pR Special Events Advertising Promotions Target Market Segments -- www.temeculacvb.org Link to lodging property/attraction Book Vacation Positive Experience - Collect Information - Measure Programs - Make Adjustments and Refinements u1 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Section XI Marketing Tactics A. Sales Goal: Develop group sales programs that generate approximately 6,000 room nights mid week. Current Lodging Inventory: Property Name # Units Pct. Pechanga Embassy Suites Motel 6 Temecula Creek Inn Extended Stay Hamption Inn & Spa Holiday Inn Express South Coast Winery Resort & Spa Best Western Comfort Inn Ramada Inn Rodeway Inn Rancho Califomia Inn Palomar Inn Hotel Loma Vista B&B The Churon Inn The Castle B&B Total 522 31.8% 176 10.7% 135 8.2% 130 7.9% 107 6.5% 99 6.0% 90 5.5% 76 4.6% 74 4.5% 74 4.5% 70 4.3% 39 2.4% 24 1.5% 10 0.6% 10 0.6% 26 1.6% 4 0.2% 1666 101.6% Groups Target Segments: ❖ Corporate & Incentive — (30-40%) Sales and reward based meetings. • SMERF- (30-40%) %) Social, Military, Educational, Religious and Fratemal groups Associations — (10-20%) State or National Associations Sales Forecast: The sales forecast for group sales efforts is provided on the following page. 62 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Temecula CVB Group Sales Segement Forecast Model 2006 Base 0 (assumed 2005-2006 base rooms) Protected Incremental growth in room night production 1ST Yr 2007 annual % 5.0% 2008 3.5% 2009 3.5% 2010 Basis 5986 299 6285 220 6505 228 6733 Association Corporate Incentive SMERF Gov Total National Statewide Regional 2007 Room Nights 0 1200 0 2386 0 2400 0 5986 ADR $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 Segment Revenue $0 $144,000 $0 $286,320 $0 $288,000 $0 $718,320 2008 Room Nights 550 500 2550 150 2535 6285 ADR 3.00% 123.60 123.60 123.60 123.60 123.60 123.60 Segment Revenue 60 $67,980 661,800 6315,180 $18,540 $313,326 $0 0776,826 2009 Room Nights 550 500 2655 200 2600 6505 ADR 3.00% 127.31 127.31 127.31 127.31 127.31 Segment Revenue $0 $70,019 $63,654 $338,003 $25.462 $331,001 $0 $828,139 2010 Room Nights 600 500 2800 300 2533 6733 ADR 3.00% 131.13 131.13 131.13 131.13 131.13 Segment Revenue $0 $78,676 $65,564 $367,156 $39,338 $332,145 $0 $882,880 3 year growth Assumptions: $164,560 18.64% Temecula Hotel Community 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 rooms 1640 1640 1640 1640 1640 rooms available 598600 598600 598600 598600 598600 occupied rooms 430992 annual occupancy 72,00% CVB group rooms 5986 6285 6505 6733 CVB occ 1.00% 1.05% 1.09% 1,12% CVB grp rms/occ rms 1.39% midweek occ 40% Annual growth rate in rate runs flat at 3% Annual room inventory does not expand over forecast Annual occupied rooms will fluctuate up or down Annual ADR applied in flat basis to all segments, future actuals should be utilized Source: SMG Estimates 63 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Segment Approach 1. Corporate and Incentive Market Focus: Small Group executive level board meeting/retreats and corporate education and training. • Develop meeting planner sales presentation kit that includes gross capacities, service levels, destination amenities and booking contact information. • Develop an annual newsletter to meeting planners highlighting new products and services. • Send out direct e-mail pieces to targeted group meeting planners from growth industries with destination updates on the Temecula Valley region, including hotels' value dates and new venues. • Conduct four annual sales blitzes to targeted origination markets (Orange County/Los Angeles), inviting hospitality members to present services/facilities to meeting planner prospects for corporate meetings. • Take membership within Southern CA chapters of MPI if sponsorship can be found. (MPI does require membership to sponsor new supplier candidates) • Identify and Assist corporate travel planners and meeting planners with organizing a minimum of 15 site tours of properties, attractions and outside activities that meet their needs and create the desire to bring their business to Temecula Valley- South West California. • Create one annual corporate meeting planner event in Temecula including golf toumament or barrel room wine tasting dinner, spa services and shopping tours. • Host site visits for target meeting planners. 2. SMERF Market Focus: Education, Social, Religious • Develop programs to target wine industry including wine seminars, master sommeliers and other pertinent industry education components. Integrate food education and cooking components into this segment approach. • Target key Sports organizations including soccer leagues, softball leagues and bicycle groups for consideration of Temecula during the pertinent seasons. • Consider wedding industry to targeted periods if the fit works between wineries and hotels. • Develop religious retreat segments as identified opportunities present themselves. 3. Association Market Focus: Regional Association Meetings • Target 50 qualified statewide and regional associations to consider the Temecula Valley as a potential meeting destination. • Create a second tier of 50 prospects for continued efforts. Emphasis will be placed on the markets that feed demand (So Cal and Sacramento) • Develop memberships with California ASAE and regional chapters in Southem CA demand generation areas of San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles. • Work to establish site inspections for key potential prospects • Work to gain regional chapter meetings of broader National Association groups. 64 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan 4. Tour and Travel • Identify regional ground operators of coach and limousine services to facilitate small group tours built around wine country hospitality and accommodations with focus to off season and mid week demand generation. • Develop affinity tour groups such as vintage or collector car clubs, agricultural science or other identified targets Sales Action Plan 1. Tradeshows and Memberships Short Term: • Affordable Meetings -West, Target audience is corporate, association, incentive meeting planners • IT&ME-The Motivation Show, Chicago, IL. Target Audience is incentive and corporate meeting planners. San Jose June 2007 • North American Journeys, - January 2007, Los Angeles, CA. Target Audience is International and Domestic Tour Operators. • MPISCC (Meeting Professionals International Southem California Chapter), March 2007, Los Angeles. Target audience is corporate meeting planners. 2. Direct Sales Short Term: • Undertake monthly or quarterly sales calls within key segment demand generation markets to include day travel to prospect offices and occasional multi day sales missions • Host special sales receptions for corporate site decision makers at appropriate places and times to retain awareness and develop new relationships. One such event should be held in each Southern Ca regional market of San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles. • Establish specific quota's for sales contacts to be made weekly and monthly within each segment targeted. Quotas must follow to segment priorities and goals. 3. Client Relations & Account Retention Short Term • Maintain relationships with current and past clients to secure repeat business and generate new opportunities for the region. Work with destination hotels to gain perspective of key accounts • List top 10 ten clients and actions to maintain their business. • Manage leads to a close by acting as liaison between client and hospitality partner to secure hospitality business into the Temecula Valley Region- South West California. • Qualify all details of potential business with an emphasis on determining key deciding factors. These deciding factors will be communicated to hospitality partners to secure the business in the Temecula Valley. • Develop a meeting planner section within the destination web site that provides for meeting information requests and response (integrate this with below web discussion) 65 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan • Respond to Internet inquires and qualified prospects by mailing out visitors guides, sales brochures and other sales materials. • Assist groups with hotel and non -hotel needs such as destination management companies, transportation, off-site venues, attraction, team building and all other hospitality services to maximize member benefits. • Build a dynamic group sales module into destination web site that provides initial detailed information for meeting planners to undertake preliminary research on capacities and facilities 4. Research New Markets Short Term: • Query Temecula Valley members to determine needs periods and targeted business scope. • Define and research sales sources to be used to generate new business. • Develop pre and post FAM/SITE tours for larger groups convening in So CA where appropriate 5. Direct Mall Mid Term: • Create a targeted and unique direct-mail piece that will be sent directly to pre -registered attendees for all trade shows locally to create interest in the Temecula Valley. 6. Industry Memberships Short Term • Join and maintain memberships in the following organizations for networking and new business opportunities: Society of Incentive Travel Executive( SITE), Religious and Conference Management Association (RCMA), Meeting Professionals International (MPI), California Society of Association Executive (CaISAE), Hospitality Sales & Marketing Association International (HSMAI), The goal will be for the TVCVB team and sales staff to attend chapter meetings from primary targeted regions. 7. Promotions Mid Term: • Introduce Temecula Valley tie in promotions to the leisure, religious, sports, fraternal groups utilizing affinity vehicles they align with • Place destination co-op advertising in selected tour brochures in conjunction with, members for group sales to corporate, association and, SMERF segments. • Develop on-line packaging programs to increase online sales. 8. Sales Measurements Short Term: • Develop tracking system for guest rooms, Food & Beverage, and meeting room revenue for all definite bookings that are consumed in 06 and record actual sales results against these goals as an ongoing monthly and annual measurement system of sales effectiveness. • Develop a tracking system for contracted bookings in the area of guest rooms, food & Beverage, and meeting room revenue for all definite bookings that are consumed in 05-06. 66 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan • Develop systems for tracking spending as a performance, measure to determine economic impact of group business booked in our region. • Conduct monthly sales meetings with members to address trends, targets selling and destination packaging for the Temecula Valley. • Invite individual members to weekly sales meetings to present and educate the Bureau staff and sales team on member promotions and provide business updates. • Partner with member to promote the Temecula Valley region by offering client educational tours, site inspections, and co- op trade show opportunities. 9. Other Short Term: • Develop a specific group sales budget including expected room night and revenue sales volume to community, record monthly actual sales results against such plan, develop an expense budget that breaks out resource spending against each segment and in a priority that ties to the revenue goals by segment and to strategic plan. (half of this is now presented above, the sales expense budget now gets created based upon segments and actions defined above) • Develop an appropriate sales material kit in conjunction with the private sector to present a unified destination presentation. (now previously covered -redundant) • Develop a Sales Committee from the private sector to assist and support the CVB sales efforts. (integrated in notion above in measurements) • Adapt the core Temecula creative message to the group meeting segment stretching the brand beyond the leisure travel segment and positioning the group/meeting benefits of the destination. • Encourage add-on days to meeting and conference visitors by presenting the destination as one that offers much to see and do beyond business. • Develop collateral support materials that can be used to get the attention of target segment decision makers. (covered above sections) • Implement specific communication programs to targeted publications and online media database resources that serve meetings and conference organizers. (this is the start of the PR action steps, it could be expanded and identified as such) • As part of the website, develop a meetings and conference section, in conjunction with the private sector, which is designed to direct meeting and conference planners to a final property. (integrate with above web site discussions) • Partner with local destination management companies to cooperatively solicit incentive business and third -party planners in targeted cities. (move to tour and travel and incentive sections above) 67 11111111 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan B. Brand Development and Promotion Short Term • Continue to include the TVCVB logo and positioning statement in every marketing effort including printed materials, print ads, trade show booth and online initiatives. • Develop specific message points that promote the key points of differentiation and primary tourism assets that help to build and promote the Temecula Valley brand over the long-term. Integrate supporting message points into all marketing programs that target meetings, groups and leisure travelers. • Educate and encourage local newspapers, magazines and media to use "Temecula Valley" brand name in their communications about the region to foster support by locals for destination wide tourism efforts implemented by TVCVB. Mid Term: • Encourage all BID partners, the City of Temecula, and tourism related businesses to include the Temecula Valley destination brand on their websites and appropriate printed materials in order to unify all destination tourism assets under one identity. • Build a photo library of the primary tourism attractions including wineries, golf courses, meeting facilities, Pechanga Resort & Casino, entertainment, Old Town, shopping and special events in order to support the brand and message points for both leisure and group market segments. • Obtain testimonials from satisfied meeting planners, group leaders and decision makers to use in specific marketing efforts to help build credibility for the destination among target market segment. Testimonials or quotes could be used in press releases, group/business print materials and TVCVB website pages. • Understand visitor perceptions about Temecula Valley brand through implementation of comprehensive visitor's survey. C. Visitor Data CollectionNisitor Database The collection of visitor data and the creation of a visitor database will be the lifeline for Temecula Valley marketing efforts. It is not cost effective to make an investment in visitor contact efforts (trade shows, advertising, etc.) without securing visitor data to keep that costly visitor contact informed about year-round activities and special events in Temecula Valley. Temecula Valley's future success is contingent upon ongoing, quality visitor relationship programs. The primary mechanisms for collecting visitor information and data include: Short Term: • Website/lntemet o Email capture system on TVCVB website o Online monthly newsletter with "forward newsletter" mechanism to encourage new readers/visitors o Online ads/promotions o Visitor's Guide online order form o Meeting Planner's Guide online order form • Print Advertising o Email leads collected via reader service mechanism sent to TVCVB from publication 68 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan o Leisure leads to TVCVB via 888# or website o Group sales leads to TVCVB sales staff • Trade Shows o Promotions (sign up/collection of emails) o Attendee surveys o Online newsletter sign up form • Promotions o Participant entry forms with email sign up form for online newsletter o Email sign ups on TVCVB website • Special Events o Online newsletter sign up form o Attendee surveys • Leads from TVCVB Partners o Reciprocal website links from BID members, City of Temecula, wineries, Pechanga, attractions, etc. that generate visitors to TVCVB website o Emails generated by partnerships, i.e., Southwest Airlines, CTTC, etc. • Visitor's Guide Orders (888#, website) • Meeting Planner's Guide Orders (888#, website) • Meetings and Groups sales leads Collecting visitor information will assist the TVCVB with more targeted programs over the long-term as well as help to obtain a visitor profile of current and potential guests. All visitor data will be directed to the online newsletter database where they will be continually educated about year-round activities, specials and events in Temecula Valley that will encourage new and repeat overnight visits. Specific meetings and groups sales leads will have additional customized sales activities. D. Website Enhancements (See complete Website Review located in Appendix of this report) Short Term: • Consider simplifying the Home Page in order to make it more user friendly and to achieve primary goals: collect emails, book a trip/rooms/packages, promote special events, and to order guides. • Consider restructuring navigation where repetitive to provide a clear and simple 'choice' for users, driving them to click on the links and take the CVB's desired action, be it to book a trip, request a guide or sign up for email newsletter. • Add unique title tags to all pages (while some pages have tags, not all do). • Add and maintain a blog to provide ongoing updated information to assist users and search engine rankings. • Consider purchasing a slightly more consumer -friendly URL like www.visittemecula.com, as the acronym "CVB" isn't as intuitive to someone researching travel. 69 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan • Test and fix all pages that do not render correctly in all browsers including Firefox and Netscape. • Consider streamlining the booking process with fewer options. If the goal is to encourage visitors to book a trip to Temecula Valley, consider having one option only and include lodging, cars and flights within the booking engine. Similarly, instead of offering multiple links (get a room, get some wheels) to the same booking engine, it may be Tess confusing for the user to simply offer the links to hotels, attractions, car, packages and deals that are currently on top of the ARES booking engine. • Revamp ad units on home page to feature one or two larger units that rotate. This provides greater value to the advertiser, potentially attracting more and should result in a cleaner look. • Set up an email capture system on every page in the navigation bar above the fold. Include a more in-depth system that allows the user to request a guide, provide geographic information and indicate email newsletter interests for segmentation purposes. • Investigate developing specialized newsletters and customized email updates based on interests (i.e. wine, recreation, meetings, groups, weddings, entertainment, events, lodging specials & packages). • Create a monthly online newsletter for all travelers to promote year-round activities and special events to the visitor database in order to encourage repeat visits, especially during the slower seasons. a. Include the TVCVB brand, key positioning message points and links to the BID members and attractions. b. Include a "forward newsletter" option to encourage new sign ups as a viral marketing tactic. c. Ensure the newsletter is of the highest quality before sending to the database. Make sure it is formatted correctly for HTML, text and AOL users and for different browsers. Make sure all the links work and that the copy has been edited for readability, spelling errors and relevant content for the specific visitor segment. Test the format before it is sent to the database. d. Ensure newsletter copy is free of spam alert words, i.e., Free, Spam, any words in all CAPITALS, etc. e. To ensure the newsletter complies with federal law (CAN -SPAM act), include an unsubscribe link and the TVCVB physical address and contact information in every newsletter. • Measure the newsletter based upon opened emails, click-throughs to specific TVCVB website pages, click-throughs to featured links, and increased user sessions on the TVCVB website. • Develop an online marketing strategy including search engine optimization, paid search, online advertising and email marketing campaigns. • Improve exposure for BID members on the lodging section (Places to Stay and Sleep) and improve usability for the end user by including a photo, copy and direct link to each property under each category like the Book Online page. • Assist meeting planners and provide better exposure for BID members and tourism businesses by improving the Conventions/Conferences section by including listing of each meeting facility with a link similar to Book Online page. • Update overall copy including current events, specials, promotions, etc. on an ongoing basis to provide continual updated information for new and repeat users. • Upgrade the Visitor's Guide and Meeting Planner's Guide Order forms to including brief survey questions about how the user found out about the website in order to track effectiveness of marketing efforts. Include a note next the email field that user will be added to monthly online newsletter database. 70 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan • Implement a reciprocal link strategy with BID members, attractions and businesses in Temecula Valley as well as outside of the area where it makes sense to improve search engine optimization and to build visitor database for ongoing visitor relationship programs. • Measure monthly user sessions, traffic to specific pages, referrers, page views, desired actions (i.e. email sign ups, guide orders) and exit links (click- throughs) to BID members and strategic partners in order to continually improve the site's usefulness and efficiency. • Conduct a thorough review of the website measurements compared to website layout/navigation system in order to determine if current website organization is achieving identified goals, i.e., links to BID members, bookings, etc. • Develop an online promotion to give away a trip to Temecula Valley for those visitors who participate in an Internet survey designed to gather emails, track advertising and brand building efforts and to develop a visitor profile study. E. Media Planning/Advertising Short Term: • Research and develop a print media plan to reach leisure travelers with targeted publications in specific Southem California regions such as Orange County and Los Angeles, and publications that cover the southwest and state of California. • Advertise in Southwest Airlines in-flight magazine and as a Featured Destination on southwest.com in order to reach air passengers into Ontario Airport and other Southem Califomia airports. • Develop local media plan including print and broadcast to promote year-round specials events to the local and surrounding areas of Temecula Valley. • Develop print ad creative that integrates the Temecula Valley brand, key message points and the appropriate call to action based upon target market segment and co-op participation. • Print ad call to action should include sales contact information, free guide, specific website landing pages and 888#. • Investigate signage and Visitor's Guide distribution at the Ontario Airport. • Research online advertising options (banner ads) for leisure and group markets based upon number of impressions. Mid Term: • Develop a print and online media plan to reach group and business travelers with publications/websites that cover the southwestem region of the United States and Califomia. • Negotiate value-added programs including free editorial, material distribution and website exposure such as free banner ads or online newsletter editorial as part of print media buys. • Research email newsletter sponsorships, advertorial and promotional opportunities with activity -specific websites such as golf, wine, meetings, etc. in order to reach targeted online audiences and to build TVCVB email database. • Develop an online geo-targeted ad program by selecting certain IP addresses based upon a predetermined geographic region, i.e., Orange County. 71 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan • To leverage TVCVB's print budget, consider developing co-op print ads with lodging properties and attractions for leading leisure magazines such as Sunset Magazine. • For meetings and group ads consider including testimonials from highly recognized decision makers to help legitimize the appeal and qualifications of Temecula Valley to meetings/groups/business travelers. • Develop a measurement system for print and online ads including generated sales leads, collected emails, 888#s, guide orders, etc. in order to track ROI and areas of improvement. • Implement a website conversion study to determine the number of users who click -through to the TVCVB website from the various online marketing efforts including newsletters and online ads. F. Public Relations 1. Out -of -Market Short Term: Develop (or hire a professional public relations firm/professional to develop) a comprehensive public relations program including print and online activities in order to maintain ongoing media relationships and to pitch story ideas. • Update online and traditional press kit and photography to ensure Temecula Valley brand and key message points are included and fully represented. Develop segmented media lists and talking points, including blog copy, for specific travel audiences: meetings, business, golf, wine, special events, gaming, etc. • Develop unique story ideas that capture the essence of Temecula Valley. Story angles could include the following: o Wine o Old Town o Gaming o Golf o Special Events o Outdoor Activities o Meetings o Value • Target appropriate media sources in Southem Califomia (Los Angeles, Orange County) primarily and Northern Califomia and outside Califomia secondarily. Specifically target the following types of publications: o Newspapers o Lifestyle & Epicurean Publications o Wine Publications o Wine Blogs o Wine Sections in Newspapers o Wire Services o Freelance Joumalists o Travel Writers o Radio & TV o Guide Books o Online Travel Sites o Online Meeting Sites o Online "Lifestyle" Sites such as wine and golf 72 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan • Distribute information to meetings and conference planner publications to position Temecula Valley as a viable meeting and conference destination. • Communicate with the California Travel and Tourism Commission (CTTC) and provide press kit and ongoing releases for possible inclusion in their press kit stories or marketing materials. • Create and manage monthly online traveler's newsletter to opt -in subscribers. • Write and distribute monthly press releases to targeted media. Include new releases on media website pages and update site pages on an ongoing basis. • Implement targeted media FAM trips with qualified travel writers to encourage coverage of Temecula Valley. • Attend media events such as the CTTC Media Reception and Marketplace in San Francisco. Mid Term: • Work with other visitor and convention bureaus in Southem Califomia on appropriate cooperative programs that bring in travel writers who want to visit the entire area. • Develop a proactive public relations disaster plan in case of emergencies that could hinder travelers. • Measure public relations activities and program results based upon generated coverage, ad equivalency and press clips. • Targeted promotions to locals to create awareness and education for tourism within Temecula 2. In -Market Short Temi: • Develop an ongoing email communication tool/system for BID members, City of Temecula, Chamber of Commerce and tourism business community to provide ongoing updates about public relations and marketing efforts and results. • Solicit ongoing information from BID members and local tourism businesses to obtain newsworthy information to feature in out -of -market press releases and the online monthly newsletter. Mid Term: • Develop a comprehensive plan to communicate with the local and regional media. Develop and distribute press releases about TVCVB marketing activities in order to increase awareness and support for tourism marketing efforts in Temecula Valley. Meet with local and regional media as needed to gain coverage and support of TVCVB tourism promotion efforts that can be reported and broadcast on a regular basis. • Develop power point presentation for funding partners that includes a review of marketing program, results and ROI measurement. 73 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan G. Visitor Information Short Term: • Continue to enhance the Temecula Valley Visitor's Guide, Meeting Planner's Guide, brochures and CD as sales tools for the entire region as new capital investments are added in order to continue to promote a sophisticated and unified destination. • Develop a comprehensive distribution plan for the Visitor's Guide to include corporate locations throughout Califomia and possibly the southwest, and in select California Welcome Centers utilizing Certified Folder distribution channels to reach leisure travelers. • Research distribution plan for the Meeting Planner's Guide in order to reach group/meetings/business decision makers. • Track distribution of guides by orders via 888#, online order forms, print ad leads, newsletter links, selected California Welcome Centers, corporate locations and trade shows. • Investigate distribution of the Visitor's Guide at Ontario and Orange County airports. Mid Term: • Develop integrated destination wide information system using kiosk technology (pictured below) designed to educate visitors, extend their stays and increase their spending while in Temecula Valley. • Investigate costs to create Visitor Centers in the wine country and Old Town that could either be staffed or include kiosks. • Measure the effectiveness and appeal of Temecula Valley printed and online visitor information with a visitor survey in order to identify necessary improvements or changes. H. Special Events/Promotions Short Term: • Create quarterly special event seasons that tie together aII of the various events occurring during the 3 month period to create a larger attraction and to help cross -sell events such as the Winter Special Events Promotion featuring the Winter Barrel Tasting, Good Old Days Car Show and the Bluegrass Festival. 74 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan • Support the development of a "Foodie" promotion that includes all of the restaurants, agricultural partners, wineries, farmer's markets, etc. to showcase the local and regional agriculture and cuisines. (Similar in nature to the Thursday evening street fair in San Luis Obispo.) • Feature quarterly Special Events and "Foodie" promotions on the website, in the online newsletter, press releases and ads. A great example is a weekly farmers market that brings together local farm produce with wines and local restaurant s and chefs. Mid Term: • Create "Foodie' Lodging Packages with all partners in order to encourage overnight visits during slower season. • Create quarterly Special Events Packages that include events, attractions, retailers and lodging properties in order to stimulate overnight visits during each quarter. • Measure promotional efforts by number of room nights generated, travel spending, attendance at featured seasonal events and attractions, collected visitor information, leads, requests for specific information and website visits and click- throughs. I. Strategic Partnerships Short Term: • Maintain strong partnerships with the City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Winegrowers. • Investigate partnership with Southwest Airlines in order to reach air passengers traveling into the Ontario Airport and to develop a comprehensive travel partnership program that includes promotions, air packages, advertising, online exposure, sales programs, etc. • Investigate partnership opportunities with the CTTC in order to enhance Temecula Valley's exposure in its marketing efforts such as a location for filming or to participate in cooperative programs that reach out-of-state visitors. Mid Term: • Measure partner programs based upon website activity, generated visitor information, generated sales leads, guide distribution, bookings and travel spending impacts to determine effectiveness and ROI. 75 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan J. Research and Measurement In order to determine if the Temecula Valley marketing program is achieving long-term goals and objectives, it is imperative that the TVCVB creates a comprehensive system to measure the effectiveness of all marketing efforts. Temecula Valley marketing efforts have two levels of measurement. One measurement includes computing the performance and Retum on Investment (ROI) of the TVCVB marketing efforts. Efforts can be measured through website usage and various costs per analysis of specific activities, as well as tracking the leads sent to BID lodging properties and attractions. The other measurement includes calculating the ROI to the business community generated through travel spending. Temecula Valley lodging properties can measure revenues generated from tourism through the analysis of their T.O.T. collection reports. It should be noted that not all of the marketing efforts can have a designated ROI such as ads and public relations that are designed to build brand awareness. Building brand awareness is just as critical to long-term success as specific marketing efforts designed to drive a particular response that can be tracked. Brand building can be measured, however, through the monthly user sessions on the TVCVB website in which all Temecula Valley marketing efforts are designed to feed into. Short Term: • Establish an annual budget for a comprehensive research and measurement program in order to develop a baseline for measuring the results of specific marketing efforts, as well as areas of refinement and overall ROI. • Review annual increases in Temecula Valley T.O.T. collections, ADR, room nights sold, occupancy rates and travel spending in order to determine the impact of TVCVB marketing program on the local economy. • Conduct ongoing measurement of all marketing efforts to determine if programs are increasing visitations to the TVCVB website, links to BID lodging properties and ovemight bookings. • Invest in a comprehensive website reporting system in order to understand the website users behavior and to identify areas of improvement. The report should track user sessions, site paths, page views, top exit and entry pages, as well as the links (click throughs) from the TVCVB website to the BID lodging properties, attractions and partners. • Develop a special events survey in order to gather precise Information about the economic Impact of events. • Develop a visitor profile study in order to understand the visitor's perception, behavior and motivations as well as demographic data. Use the study findings to refine marketing messages and to better target marketing efforts to more efficiently reach the most lucrative visitor segments. • Encourage each tourism related business including wineries, lodging properties, attractions, special event promoters, etc., to collect visitor demographic information whenever possible in order to understand the Temecula Valley visitor demographics and economic impact. Mid Term: • Survey the tourism business community in order to understand their perception of the TVCVB marketing strategy and program in order to make refinements to specific efforts, and to identify if business levels have improved due to TCVCB efforts. • Establish benchmarks for measuring the ROI for each marketing effort such as a Cost Per Inquiry, Cost Per Visitor Contact/Sales Lead, Cost per Click -Through, Cost per Visitor Guide, etc. • Utilize and share the information with BID members and tourism business community in order to stimulate change and innovation for overall tourism efforts. 76 Temecula Valley Convention and SUM* MdtkudetvPIii Once a visitor database has reached a critical mass, develop and implement an online survey to determine if the print ads and other marketing efforts increased visits to the TVCVB website. 77 00111111111011111100:0110„: 1„„„00000„10,100 l0 0 0 00IH 111111111111111111111' ,1,1,1,1,1,1 000000000000000,000000 11111100000010,000, , uuuiuul 00 11111111111111111 01001111110 ))))),))))1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0000 1000000000,00 00,0001101001011.0010100 0 ro jJ to w 0 4-' f0 CO W N ,-I 0 .--1 0 00000,00 000,001000,00,00 111101101j."1111' 01111 I�I11�� 11111111111111 1111111:::.„ 1°I'°oii la " I%8 1 m wI 1 VV 1110 111V1111111111111111111111111..f, f01111.1.1111--10„, 1.„). 111111111111111111 lllIIIA 000000000111111,111,11111111111,111,1111111 FISCAL 2011-2012 PROPOSED TRADE SHOW SCHEDULE AND BUDGET Est. Staff Hours Trade Show Profile Trade Show 0 s 0 N 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 C d a ,7t O .,,"2.5 0 d0 n0 a. V O.8 O OO O u u u u 72 v -61 v b c t 'o 2 : FISCAL 2011-2012 PROPOSED TRADE SHOW SCHEDULE AND BUDGET Est. # Attendees 2 Trade Show Profile O V 0 •a u a a sr;—:..o :s w m ua` yc E c ' o 0 -o 3 v a c c v Ivo c � 11; o 2 m a c -o a v E :,38E 41 -CO `- O U 2 a v e O N 9.99.a 0 c r 0 ry ux O ' Vi ri Smart Meetings The Smart Mart 0 0Q c C a v o 0 a o o c _ o f= S. c E_ O O J am •�- v m a c E E O • C C E 01 E C IUIIiIit as `° 1• .m a 5 c .c t w m y a 01 v O®j 0 s w a w c v v w y a w o v E c E o — v m O o w a C m g d 0 0 o m E o av 60 « > c ri' a b O' C .M `VVVryN'' 3 E w g N N g > a O o C C O W 0 01 J L. a -1),. v v d C 41 u W 3 8 v a E v v as December 2011 $ 1500.00 $ CaISAE Seasonal Spectacular n 0 O O 0 O Ln 00 0 a o 0 cio o ,c1 o in o- a+ m ri n n +n 0 0 o O 0 o O O O 0O D 00 N M1~ 00 41, 4/1. LL m 0 February 2012 Leisure and Sports Travel O d0' Desert Golf and Travel Show O N LA Times Travel Sho FISCAL 2011-2012 PROPOSED TRADE SHOW SCHEDULE AND BUDGET Est. Staff Hours Trade Show Profile Trade Show 0 3 N N N N N 8 b N 3 17 0 0 0 pm O O O O O O 8 O O N O NO O r9 m O O N co 4" V' N O ;v O J J ® O - g d v O ° W C >:2,,,i, Z .J 1 F.E. >,:`." m g> m C g C O °o o v x W� m w E v, a o ti m > , e m o 22gv --5°g2 o ? _ Y( _14 ° o C = v .- v v a u o - o E °� 2-, z a o 1"2" N ° > o a 2 c v ` E w° 3 H 3 N u°6 -,,,of,- m d` 2>" -E.. -.9=c ro—w C O ® ® O ro d O u r �_ � O s, - ad 2..2 -E;10;--. C ° � L e a h ,n O .-o.c p 1,V282.=2 m `m ° L w o 3 E a,w m c -° -o L E C ®. y -OW -O t "O u v E i® m n 0 O ® O ® O O O ® O O O O ® O 00 o d N V mm a4 r1 May 2-3, 2011 E ation Symposium 0 September 2011 3 Mini Travel & Trade Show TEAMS Conference & Expo 0 0 O 000 O u Bay Area Travel Show alb 0 0 N ua February 2012 d 0 ggy. VF ilb a/F 411- og 00 0 0 00 N 00 m 01 Cp N M H 0 N N VF y} vi Ul O N C - > Q ar <:20 tai a H FISCAL 2011-2012 PROPOSED TRADE SHOW SCHEDULE AND BUDGET a m 2 Trade Show Profile e Vf O O t C O E, u • ® a • ro l7 c a .3 n .n ..% « c o W E m« 0)1;1E1_1?°p ro,`o oo E= O« E y v m m v « m 6,-) v j m g -§ -p.. 72= • m ▪ m a 0.15 L = C ,®U U a =vm vi O ` 'pp C e U = . ® a C p C K c o v `;.Y2 m c v v v � - m ,c 3 y o 0 3 ,v. C W « `c.1° v a u a ® • °w vE -o • E Y a c m 2 a m E 3 EA 2 m• o m E 231.2 ▪ v 8N05,a v a o 'c+ N O 0 Bridal Bizaar M 0 0 0 0 N N erator Shows O H 0 ® a c 'a ri o C N N 6 « m o c E.mooa � -Oa a a ° w® c a a $ E> E n Y 2 v - v h ro '- 0 N N wo` m0 3° °1 .® « r u 3 0 2 C Ov EE o v « w C m m v v GO a. N O . W C � O 0..17;1 g a 0 v c E 2. -- o a c • c y w 3 °J• P o f° v S 0 • �' Fz v m - r o p 0 01 ill ▪ 2.0 a ° E c vi °m m n °f E g c V c = m ¢' d m m._ t E m v o o® v m v j Ft:m W a m m m m ro c N y E v N= vi ,v, � c .`. « 3_12_ o w m 0 Lei 2 nw ..°2E -o ro® ro c v a ® U a 0 C N 0 ry San Francisco May 21-25, 2011 $ ternational Pow Wow Co -Op 0 .3 The Trade Show Est. # Attendees Est. Staff Hours Trat J Q U m v") w 1 z M 5 N m Go West Summit N OO m m OO O17 m w 00 ti • m 0 10 va ti 0 Media/PR Shows O 0 0 O 0 0 ti CO C C n 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 Ow 660 N Q1 m N O O N .-4" Nti N N Vs R ? w th N 0 0 >.. N E m j g V " l d g L N N N 0 od SS N 1-1.2 O N N O ec n Q -1/1. o 0 w N N N ti ti N o N N 1,12 E n O 91 -61¢ W m .5.5 mm 6 ¢ F- F- an 8 CTTC Conference SD Concierge Association LA Concierge As 0111111 u,im�dp6,luullllll�lllffff�ggl! N11110.11 m* 00 SOUTHERN ALIFORNIA WINE COUNTRY Convention and Visitors Bureau. u���YAIM"vll�� „11111111111111111 "" oMw.,, u�i V� �r ���wl�A'AHn M W w 'II 1111111111111111111111 ,'", 1111 mumu TABLE OF CONTENTS 2010-2011 TVTBID ANNUAL REPORT © Copyright 1 Executive Summary 2010 - 2011 Budget Marketing & Public Relations -Plan 3 Trade Show Schedule & Performance Media Plan Supporting Source Documents & Charts The Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (TVCVB) is a non profit 501 c(6) funded by the Temec- ula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District, Pechanga, City of Temecula and a membership of over 140 tourism -related businesses. The TVCVB is the destination sales and marketing or- ganization. Our purpose is to stimulate economic growth and tourism in the Temecula Valley region by developing and marketing the destination to the meet- ing and travel markets. Our mission, as the tourism ex- perts in the Temecula Valley, is to run an effective busi- ness that increases awareness and measures the spend- ing in the Temecula Valley. Our Board of Directors is comprised of business owners and professionals who have experience and willingness to serve the community beyond the scope of their de- manding works schedules. Their volunteer responsibili- ties include steering company policy, financial over- sight, and determining the future course of the Bureau's mission. President &CEO Kimberly Adams VP Operations & Finance Carrie Penny VP Sales & Marketing Kathleen Fitzgerald Director Of Sales Leslie Mercado Public Relation/Marketing Betsy Lohse Finance/Booking Karen Ratkowski Visitors Center Specialist Pamela Locascio Becky Hess Membership Coordinator Leann Anderson Publication Contracted Support Nigro & Nigro. PC ARK Marketing Ashcraft Designs/Technology 2 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 r/rid )0110 I Executive Committee Chairman of the Board Denis Ferguson, Europa Village, LLC 1st Vice Chair John Kelliher, The Grapeline Wine Country Shuttle 2nd Vice Chair Cherise Manning, A Grape Escape Balloon Adventure Treasure Katherine Bailey, Bailey's Wine Country Escape Secretary Terri Delhamer, Keyways Vineyard & Winery Board of Directors Marlene Altieri: Melody Brunsting: Craig Clark: Jason Curl,: Tom DeMott, Melina Ferraez,: Darleen Henderson: Grant Channing Carlos Palma: Craig Puma: Mario Richmond: Joy Sarolia: Bill Seltzer: Jan Smith: Bill Wilson: Fairfield Inn & Suites— TID Melody's Ad Works Pechanga Resort & Casino Temecula Creek Inn-TID Embassy Suites -TID Promenade Temecula Hampton Inn & Suites-TID Pechanga Resort & Casino Palomar Inn Hotel The Bank- Mexican Restaurant Triple R Sports Group Quality Inn-TID Temecula Valley Golf School Inland Management Group Wilson Creek Winery u i iip;pu` economy. Our name Temecula best describes our FY 2010-2011, "Sun shining through the mist "and we did just that especially through this changing Our CVB Board and team worked smarter and more aggressively in our sales and marketing efforts pro- moting our destination. We replaced under perform- ing tradeshows and advertising with fresh new pro- grams and initiatives. Temecula is doing relativity well compared to our competitive set. Leisure travel is coming back with our consistent and long standing special event. How- ever our business travel is still down over 25%. The CVB entered our facial year with a 50% funding in- crease that allowed us to go from a 2% assessment to 4%. This increase could have not been executed at a better time for Temecula with the extreme competi- tion within the destination marketing industry. We are all competing for the drive markets of California and the Canadian traveler. Temecula continues to stay on the cutting edge and is seen as a mighty robust destination positioned be- tween the top three California markets. Temecula is our gold mind we need to continue to shine and mar- ket all the wonderful experiences Temecula has to offer. We are proud to share with you our results in direct sale, public relations, marketing and partnerships, and we look forward to even greater positive impact in 20 -2012, Kimberly 1 d'P' President & CEO, Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau 3 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 Temecula TID Assessment 1,200,000 — ......... L 1,029,377 1,000.000 Temecula Transient Occupancy Tax collected 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,017,726 2,000,000 y 1,500,000 1,000,000 tG lj 500,000 1,9 1.994 530,908 FY 07-08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 Temecula Average Hotel Occupancy 59.5 59 55.5 56 57.5 57 56.5 56 59 FY 09-10 FY 10 11 e Occupancy Temecula Average Daily Rate 99 913 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 FY 09-10 95 FY 10-11 AOR The hospitality industry experienced ongoing chal- lenges in FY -2010-2011. Although the industry continues to be impacted by the Up Economy, posi- tive movement is occurring. Toward the second QTR the hotels started reporting growth (but slow) with increase over prior year number. Rates are still lagging and business meetings are below aver- age leisure travel is coming back. In FY 10-11, the CVB achieved 83.33% of its goal for potential room nights generated. 7,692 potential room nights generated against a goal of 4,082 (09/10 numbers). The CVB generated leads goal was slightly missed with 50 leads gener- ated against a goal of 60. The CVB Sales Department made positive strides in penetrating new markets such as association, wed- dings, religious and tour operator Business which generated a growing number of leads. The Sales Department experienced delay in the hir- ing of two newly approved positions for the 2010- 2011 TID year, due to funding cash flow and new hiring process. Both positions will be filled in first QTR of 2011. This impacted lead generation. /,r//G%T/(„, / 0 ,( PerMeasures /f P110%ie r9 LEADS GENERATED LEADS BOOKED BOOKED ROOM NIGHTS PROJECTED ECONOMIC IMPACT POTENTIAL ROOM NIGHTS 31 194,357 607 1,106,072 4,082 1lij000fiiii%% 50 190,638 908 2,019,467 7,692 4 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 (fl JJfllff�/ W��/, (// I„ ��„ 4 Il IN ,,1�4„1„! v ,i F'',� i `�i r ' 1 $V j I'I G ;u The 10-11 TID increased budget recourses impacted the CVB's trade show schedule, and multiple trade shows were included in our Sales and Marketing plan. In FY 10-11 the sales team participated in 22 trade shows, resulting in 20 Leads being generated, repre- senting over 1,600 potential room night and 30,000 attendees and nearly 5242,361 in projected economic impact for the Temecula Valley TID hotels, venues and event service providers. liar 1 4,': AOf+ The sales team hosted 39 meeting and event planner and preformed 3 site tours to familiarize planners with the Temecula Valley destination. Market seg- ments represented at these destination tours in- cluded corporate, social, association, tour & travel, film scouts and wedding. Mar 10 MPI SCC, Los Angeles, CA Mar '10 OC's Largest Mixer, Orange, CA Apr' 10 Successful Meetings University, Monterey, CA May '10 MPI Educational Conference, Newport Beach, CA Jun 'lo Festival of Brides, Temecula, CA Jun '10 HSMAI Affordable Meetings West, Long Beach, CA Jun 'lo Orange County Concierge Show, Orange County Jun '10 San Diego Concierge Show, San Diego, CA Jul 'to MPI World Education Conf., Vancouver, Canada rr Corporate Leisure Corporate Corporate Wedding Corporate Concierge Concierge Corporate Sep '10 Sep '10 Sep '10 Oct '10 Dec '10 Jan '11 Jan '11 Feb '11 Feb 11 Smart Meetings -The Smart Meeting, Phoenix, AZ Travel Media Showcase, Irvine, CA Mini Travel & Trade Show, Irvine, SD, Riverside, CA TVCC Business Expo, Temecula, CA CaISAE Seasonal Spectacular, Sacramento, CA Bay Area Travel Show, Santa Clara, CA RCMA Annual Conference, Tampa Bay, FL AAA Arizona, Glendale, AZ MPI San Diego Educ. Conf., San Diego, CA Corporate Media Leisure Leisure Association Leisure Religious Leisure Corporate In conjunction with on going sales calls, missions and tradeshows, the sales team initiated or was involved in special sales projects and events. These activities gen- erated lead opportunities ad increased the visibility of the Temecula Valley CVB to target audiences. Among these activities were: Temecula Valley Road Show -The sales team and TID sales task force team developed and implemented the CVB Road Show destination showcase event designed to present the Temecula Valley Southern California Wine Country's meeting and event venues to meeting planners and tour operators. The premier program was presented in LA and Orange County and 35 planners attended. 20 CVB member hotels and partners venues exhibited at this event. Pechanga Resort & Casino Promotion— for the second year the CVB and hotel partners initiated and supports Pechanga's Rewards and coupon rack card program with partner hotel room booking. TID partnering hotels distributed over 22,000 coupon. Industry Networking Activities— The CVB sales team maintained its active participation in industry associa- tions and organizations as a means of promoting the Temecula Valley and interacting with clients and pros- pects in a very valuable way. Staff participated in spe- cial events and project with MPI , HSMAI and CaISAE ASAE. Membership Outreach & Support—The second Sales Educational Seminar was presented, to help members uncover and close business opportunities. Attendance was up over the previous year as many as 40 CVB members and attendees. In addition the sales team attended three Mega Mixers in the IE, OC and Temec- ula. 5 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 a.IWehdk oo..ed nm.ineyards. crpmalve .e.. ..ddo,.11.aUUYoohg h uak.re...ai ..r ..e.r.aaor rale, . MN .. r 001.000. 00001.0000.0000 Nato �. nYen.aw.r c.ftw. *w �k+.m mda.matm..nn .d. Y.0....Y mato . 6000M. YYd Ereasumfoard uel. c 4ad. n dew$rt. 0.dAws.r.l10,0Wyd,0ivdL 013.00.1741.1041,1104400.4* rw....6 .0.4.4 $wpw. 4.00.0000001 .P40,44 Yii.t ddh.dW MyAvarp aa+. a. .rea.milmamk. 10000, ,000100000.00$4040000010ra 60010 ''.f.. Temecula Valley So.m..ex ( ..FORMA WrosCourrrail 01.0 000 0.nr000 00 CU o 00G (Y8(0) YPp.xliga w0rycd�W .A{np}Cdnu lairtoq�LL.Y.Y. 6.tl�pFM 10444,019. 1od plan maw 1000000.00100.00040041000001 t�.r1., ert�n,.ray noY. an n�r+l Pit. e..arY>(p 00000000.00,00.es00000ep itt.00,00,00,04,00,000000.0400,0ttittitit.0.100,00 .00:0,000,00.000.0,00 »dy ke0006000• ew/ 00,0 a Vh.. pu..dm ems. dvt pe..sui e74r10.ti.r,4r...rr,r M...d,..I Smari Maeinp flam.n clavas. Sonhom Calbau Woo Crrrn.vy for n. any ol rarao v year-round KLM,.. and eburclancy of (17l1OI14 t 11' 11I11C)tll•Li• .S. 000110 000,000N10 S0 t t YEA. n9.10 01,60.1 f550d E 1 ,/ ET`x! �� ;'11J,,i4ifitI The TVCVB works hard to build professional relationship with media outlets and representatives in various markets to build and maintain awareness of the Temecula Valley as a travel destination. The CVB supplies the media with current information, editorial content, story ideas and imagery. Our activities generated over 2.3 million in in- kind press editorials, publication and on-line press. A total of 29 press releases were instated and researched the fiscal year. Additionally, the TVCVB serviced many re- leases from partners to media. Press Releases supported the Temecula Valley Southern California Wine Country brand as a entertainment, wine, golf, history, meeting, wedding, sports and culinary destination. On behalf of the TVCVB and it's partners, media visits are secured to promote the destination, with the goal of se- curing valuable editorial coverage. The CVB supported over 231 Media Inquires and hosted 75 Media Partners and executed 10 CVB Media FAM. fib! h (^/a 6 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 t%rll153SI01J`'& L1S With the purpose of networking and building and building connections with travel and life- style media, members of the CVB marketing department attended the California Tour & Travel Commission (CTTC) media event in LA and San Francisco in February and September and Destination Day in Sacramento in April. Additional events included, Travel Media Showcase, SD, OC Press Club, SD, LA and Orange County Concierge events. T111 1 r ,1,)IT°� Through public relations efforts working with traditional and new media outlets, the TVCVB exceeded our expectation and goals, reaching an audience of more than 400,119,031 mil- lion potential visitors. Contributing partners, Inside Luxury Travel Channel, CTTC Life Time Channel "Valentine AD featuring Temecula, and Orbits. // /% y'rori /%i%i IMP RESSION5 N/A 400,119;031 PRESS RELEASES 1 MEDIA TOURS 2 10 MEDIA PLACEMENT 115 100 Due to the economy the CVB and Media buyer ARK Marketing was able to negotiate better advertising rates during FY 10-11 and increase the number of placements by 30%. Print campaigns were targeted to the California drive travel and meetings markets with presence to build the brand. Print advertising placed in the California Visitors Guide, Sunset, CTTC Drives, Smart Meeting, and MPI meetings publications. The CVB provided the editorial content to include sug- gested itineraries, TID and partner listings with prop- erty details, logos and images. An online campaign was launched targeted to the drive markets in Southern California for meeting and leisure travelers. New branding banner advertising was developed to maximize new sponge cell technol- ogy, adding room booking, Visitor Guides and Calen- dar of Event. (First media buy took place in August due to TID cash flow for increase funding). Strategic placement on top travel sites, Expedia, Trip Advisor, Multi Travel and Media Sites, CTTC Online, I&MI Do - It -Workbook, Smart Meeting, Meetings West, Sun- set.com and gocalifornia.com. "0"."7"'„ /0A) INQUIRE/FULLMENT VG CALL IN DIRECT MAIL E-MAIL WEBSITE-vlsltors i <f D l 1 f G The CVB utilized e -marketing to communicate regularly with members and meeting profes- sionals, potential visitors as well as to build brand loyalty. The e -marketing promotes new, upcoming events and special promotions as well as compliments our advertising and public relations outreach for hotels and member partners. The CVB increased the number of subscribers by 20% in FY 10-11. SUZign espongecell ADS U N Room offers from as it gets, to get to, ILIIMINO 4011 A �/�1, i/ ir 24,055 31,157 NUMBER OF PRINT PLACEMENT 25 7,113 7,117 10,000 25,000 941 2,840 67,953 54,464 8 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 40 NUMBER OF DIRECT E-MAILS 24,000 225,000 TOTAL REACH PRINT/E MAIL N/A 15,000,000 TOTAL VALUE OF MEDIA PLACED N/A 150,000 CO=OP MEDIA DOLLARS 30,000 20,000 •••••• ••••‘ ....................... 11111r, ',1',.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,11111111JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJjjjjj11111.11111111111111111111,1,!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)))))))),1111111111111111111111111111111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,11,111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,111111 11 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111jjiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii,f,,,„„„„„„„„„........................,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;‘,,,,,,,,,,,,, 11111111 1111111111111111111111111 „„„v,,,,,,,rdi11111111111111111111 Ij'1'1111111111111'11'1( II 1111111111111111111111111111 '''•:•••••••.....fill.1.1111111111""""""""",111111111111111111111111111111,,111111111111111111111111111110,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,uini,1.• 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 .mm111111111111111,, „„„„„„„„„„, 111 ,6'111. • 1"11111111111111111"..1''''''''''''1"""""""""""",""""""""""J.:;r,",".1!1!1!1!1'!!'((((((("!"!",."!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",",z",.."""k",•",",1,•",",g3",•",•",..',..',..1,''",!,!,1,.1111)))))111111111111111111I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111iiiJJJJJiiJJ1111111110110011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 . ••,,,,;...,..,„.„„„.„.„.„.„6„," • 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"""""""""""""""'":".7.77.77.7.77"""""""""""""""":":":"."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""1""""""""11111111111111111111.?.""lill.l."""""""',11.11.11.1:1:1.1.1.1... """""""""""""'":""•••••;;;;;;;;;;":".....":":"1":"1"::::::::::::":":":"":":":":":"""""""":":":":""""""""""""""7"1":" 6 IAA • •••• "1..."1"1"."""1":"":111. AFFORDABLE SPLURGE STAY & PLAY 11,4011111101110111111111,11111111111,111111111111111111111111111111011111111111?1111110 0111101,111,01 '41'11 ,141:10 141411111111111111111nuloouhllooll; 44004411111144441111111111111111111110111041401,10,11111101000100m 0001"1004011111 Tenc 1•'• 17, 1 0 n Ve aul Rodgers orizon Sin Blossoms my Wayne nd Pei r Yyr" Bei°.1111:1s-plivee- ro 01 w M8 4411 „, ••,: „„•• Id,' • omv.0.01.11" "'mu I .01 1111...14. p a 1001110011000000110,111001111,001tr,,,,,,,, 11111111,11111111( 100 11111111111111111 0110.1 II': "11'1111101 I; 1111111*1114 ) t',41 ,N4 4 ir 41,1t1 iT141". ' 1°11110111u 00001111 vouuvoi Starting from $7 ..40 11 1. lqh1^ 441 014, 1111.1'11,0,;,101112'!)/1;',',6k,')„1:1J 1164 Q KW .411, CAnne. AnOr 1,1 w OM 9 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 0.0t, kalorn PrOsuktrAM, d1„144M11 1010, 1r1urffs/IIS ta,po "MA "d^41^4.P^, "^^.^ nouqh vrim$.1} ^ auturrofest 1111111114 ,"4,111'111v. %///%%//j 10 0 istaillimmml r IN 10 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 `Y, 11, 11sn o r,J 111 foiNfril;LE The Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau contin- ues to stay on the for forefront of new technologies in so- cial media. The TVCVB utilizes social media to promote the Temecula Valley Southern California Wine Country region, Temecula CVB partners and increase awareness of the Te- mecula Valley brand. bib 'I rtl� 1 Iei 1.. Promote the Temecula Valley region, the Temecula Valley part- ners and increase awareness of the Temecula Valley Brand by utilizing the Facebook Fan page, twitter accounts for both meet- ings and visitors. Encourage fans to join the CVB mailing list and visit the CVB website at www.visittemecula.org Promote the destination and increase leads for CVB Sales ser- vices by participating in Linkedln groups targeting meeting/ event planners, travel industry professionals and sporting pro- fessionals. The CVB has increased attendance at CVB events by promoting events on Facebook, twitter and blast marketing. Increase communication to CVB partners by posting on social media sites. CVB team uses Twitter and Facebook as a virtual visitors center to answer and post visitor questions and insider tips, promote partners attractions and recent press. Pitch media and optimize press release for social media in CVB Website, PRweb.com Post and utilize YouTubeVideo.com for member partners/ destination marketing. The Temecula Valley CVB educated partners on the bene- fits of social media through member partner workshops, monthly newsletter and a Trip Advisor presentation at our QTY meeting. 11 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 ulllr� �i i' �uuu 1 faceb oak It c f 6A �I1(El' S( N FACE BOOK,COM/visittemecula TWITTER.COM/ visitiemecula TWITTER/MEET YOUTUBE.com/ Temecula 349 664 N/A N/A 1693 1257 769 1,282 lf�rrrlfl/ff���' I i/iIl11 The official Temecula Valley, California visitor infor- mation portal is designed for consumers, travel trade, meeting planner, member and media. It fea- tures enhanced interactivity and functionality, in- cluding an interactive calendar of events, photo and video gallery. A booking engine processes reserva- tions and prominently visible on all Bureau web pages. 88 rooms booked in FY 10-11 on the CVB site. All online and print advertisement direct traffic to this site, which serves as a gateway to the official site. ®trpwd.-sor VidWa Tx0000I, CA' - °" # of WEB PAGES 125 ONLINE GUIDE/BROCHURE REQUEST # OF PEOPLE REGISTERED E -NEWS ONLINE PARTNERS ONLINE CO-OP INCOME 941 10,000 6 11,560 o(Iiiai/iiiiia/1" '//7/ ...,,w� �f�/rr0 pj�i��' ji TOTAL WEBSITE TRAFFIC # OF PAGE VIEWS # PAGE OF VISITS 132 3,000 15,600 2 4,265 1,1,111ed 1101. PROP, 40 67,953 54,464 N/A 172,218 2,91 2.91 ADVERAGE LENTH OF SESSION 3:00. 3:04 12 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 /,moi%%%%%% RR THE CVB produces publications essential to mar- keting the Temecula Valley as a destination for tourism and group business. In addition to their practical informational function, publications and collateral items also serve as call to action pieces and "new products" for the CVB to pro- mote through public relations and advertising. The Temecula Valley Visitor Guide is the regions official visitor information publication. In FY 10- 11 the CVB continues to partner with CVB Mem- ber partners and local vendors to produce this publication. The guide is designed to be an infor- mational piece distributed to potential visitors and consumers, as well as meeting planners, tour operators and media. The Visitors Guide is distributed at area hotels, attractions, travel and trade shows, California Welcome Center and throughout the state. The Visitors Guide has many features, including an area map, suggested itineraries, editorial em- phasis on the regions distinctive lifestyle, which includes our niche markets of food, wine, out- door activities, history, entertainment and the arts. The CVB also publishes a comprehensive meeting planner guide, and is used by the CVB sales department in their mar- keting to meeting event, tour operators and wedding plan- ners. To promote the Temecula Valley's unique niche mar- kets of wine, golf, history, entertainment, sports, weddings, the CVB distributed several brochures in FY 10-11. The newly designed Temecula Valley desti- nation map show cases our top three area assets, Pechanga Resort & Casio, Wine Country and Old Town Temecula. The CVB distributed 250,000 Temec- ula Valley maps in 1,500 locations within California. A new golf map/brochure was developed to market and promote extended stay golf, A sports map was designed to market to adult leagues and sporting parents/getaway, A wedding map was designed to promote wedding destination, extended stay and guest suggested itineraries. The new niche market brochure/map were distrib- uted to visitors and partners, through direct mail and trade show marketing. VISITOR GUIDES MEETING PLANNER GUIDE TEMECULA VALLEY SO CALWINE MAP GOLF MAP, WEDDING MAP SPORT MAP 60,000 45,000' 20,000 15,000 250,000 250,00& N/A N/A 2,5 se 11 vsigtif 1 11 13 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 i//sir moi/ //l!i////i/a ?Ji The Temecula Valley CVB collaborates with over 150 community partners, In marketing Temecula Valley as a destination, the CVB pro- vides services to all partners. Partners are re- ferred on a daily basis to consumers, media travel trade and meeting professionals. f /:1 r! R F.HT'il; ),l I-Ian,I Jill Ili Throughout the year, a variety of marketing opportunities are offered to CVB partners, in- cluding: participation in familiarization tours for meeting planners and media, inclusion in press releases, receipt of sales leads for group business, advertisement in CVB publications, participation in local networking functions, enhanced listings, access to promotional opportunities and tradeshow partici- pation. The CVB Meeting was held at the Old Town Commu- nity Theater. 100 partners and community stake- holders attended the meeting which featured high- lights by our 2009-2010 Chairman Denis Ferguson and President & CEO Kimberly Adams. The CVB and Winegrowers Association held four networking mix- ers for member partners in Wine Country. The CVB Sales Department held four Sales Happy Hours for tourism industry partners. The CVB hosted four QTR luncheons at member partner locations, topics in- cluded goal setting and motivation, hospitality and service, Sales tactics, and Trip Advisor experience feedback. The CVB successfully had over 75 members in attendance each event. 14 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau TBID Annual Report of Activities preformed up to 11/2010 2010-2011 Members By Category APS AU10,[111:0 31Ww' & itlW o lalrr y r YI uu t��iir r ��11I6� uIII I u PF rFr; lid 4 TOTAL MEMBERS MEMBERSHIP DUES MEMBER EVENTS PRODUCTED EVENTS ATTENDED 0 10,450 \\f\r\~ \\+« ���/\/ƒ is\i!\^~ ~ ~ ] { \ ® \( lam` «�':u \ . « m may \\ \ TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS' BUREAU COMPILED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Nine Month Period Ending November 30, 2010 R R o t, r s ., m N 'I, L a" a. a,A To The Board of Directors Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors' Bureau Temecula, California We have compiled the accompanying Statement of Financial Position of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau as of November 30, 2010, and the related statements of activity and cash for the nine month period then ended, in accordance with Statements of Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial statements information that is the representation of the management. We have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them. The management has elected to omit substantially all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. If the omitted disclosures were included in the financial statements, they might influence the user's conclusions about the Organization's financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Accordingly, these financial statements are not designed for those who are not informed about such matters. The supplementary information consists of a comparison of the annual budgeted amounts to the actual amounts and also the 2009/10 unspent carry forward balances of the grants for the nine month period then ended. We have compiled the supplementary information from information that is the representation of management of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors' Bureau without audit or review. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion of any other form of assurance on the supplementary information. We are not independent with respect to the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors' Bureau. /Q20 72ir i /‘)e- Nigro ‘'G Nigro & Nigro, PC December 15, 2010 1 TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION November 30, 2010 ASSETS Cash $ 279,851 Accounts Receivable 184,609 Advanced Wages 30 Inventory 4,311 Property and Equipment Furniture & Fixtures 7,881 Equipment 4,183 Less Accumulated Depreciation (7,824) TOTAL ASSETS $ 473,041 LIABILIT hS AND NET ASSETS LIABILITIES Deferred Revenue $ 29,961 Retirement Plan Payable 2,463 Payroll Taxes Payable 516 TOTAL LIABILII hS 32,940 NET ASSETS Unrestricted 98,012 Temporarily Restricted 342,089 TOTAL NET ASSETS 440,101 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS $ 473,041 TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For the Nine Month Period Ending November 30, 2010 Temporarily Unrestricted Restricted Total REVENUES, GAINS, AND OTHER SUPPORT TID Funding $ $ 820,644 $ 820,644 City Marketing 54,807 54,807 Contribution 75,000 75,000 Program Service Revenues Membership Dues 9,150 9,150 Website Advertising 3,265 3,265 Merchandise Sales 925 925 Misc Income 121 Promotional Participation 100 100 Interest Income 340 340 Net Assets Released From Restrictions: Grant Restrictions Satisfied 600,011 (600,011) TOTAL REVENUES, GAINS, AND OTHER SUPPORT 688,912 275,440 964,352 EXPENSES Cost of Merchandise Sold 3,055 3,055 Program Services Advertising -Printed Marketing 247,812 247,812 Marketing Personnel Costs 120,244 120,244 Trade Show Participation 42,003 42,003 Advertising -Website 18,509 18,509 FAM Tours / Site Visits 16,249 16,249 Travel & Entertainment 6,883 6,883 Advertising -Media 5,394 5,394 Lodging 4,975 - 4,975 Dues & Subscription 3,065 3,065 Promotional Items 3,956 3,956 Operational Personnel Costs 117,756 117,756 Rent 39,398 - 39,398 Professional Fees 33,439 33,439 Insurance 7,285 7,285 Office Supplies 6,598 6,598 Printing 4,081 4,081 Credit Card Processing 2,725 2,725 Telephone 1,464 1,464 Miscellaneous 283 283 NET ASSETS, FEBRUARY 28, 2010 NET ASSETS, NOVEMBER 30, 2010 TOTAL EXPENSES 685,174 685,174 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS 3,738 275,440 279,178 94,274 98,012 66,649 160,923 $ 342,089 440,101 TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For the Nine Month Period Ending November 30, 2010 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Increase in Net Assets Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash provided by operating activities: $ 279,178 (Increase) decrease in operating assets: Inventory 1,541 Accounts Receivable (105,382) Publication Receivable 895 Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: Accounts Payable - Vendors (4,350) IRA Payable (145) Payroll Taxes Payable (262) Accounts Payable - Credit Cards (13,897) Deferred Revenue (14,807) NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 142,771 NET INCREASE IN CASH BEGINNING CASH FEBRUARY 28, 2009 ENDING CASH NOVEMBER 30, 2010 See accompanying accountants' report. A 142,771 137,080 279,851 Supplementary Information TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU GENERAL FUND For the Nine Month Period Ending November 30, 2010 Income Advertising - Website Promotional Participation Funding Investment Revenue Membership Dues Miscellaneous Sales -Publications Merchandise Sales Total Income Expense * Cost of Goods Sold Advertising - Printed Marketing Bank Fees / Credit Card Processing FAM Tours / Site Visits Insurance Personnel Costs -Operational Printing Professional Fees Promotional Items Rent Miscellaneous Telecommunications Total Expense Net Income Actual Thru 11/30/2010 Annual'Budget 3,265 $ 100 75,000 340 9,150 121 925 88,901 3,055 1,163 1,472 350 4,616 62,935 91 2,194 1,236 6,455 282 1,315 85,164 3,737 $ Over/(Under) Budget 24,000 $ 100,000 6,000 16,410 12,000 158,410 56,803 2,580 6,720 76,740 6,552 6,455 2,560 158,410 (20,735) 100 (25,000) 340 3,150 121 (16,410) (11,075) (69,509) 3,055 (55,640) (1,108) 350 (2,104) (13,805) 91 (4,358) 1,236 282 (1,245) WIN11111. *Pm * Cost of Goods Sold: Budget Includes all purchases (purchases sold and purchases in inventory) The inventory remaining at 11/30/10 is $ 4,311. See accompanying accountants' report. (73,246) 3,737 TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU TID FUND For the Nine Month Period Ending November 30, 2010 Accu; Thru 11/30/10 Income Funding $ 820,644 $ Publication Sales Total Income Expense Advertising / Marketing Operational Total Expense Net Income 820,644 355,903 122,652 478,555 Annual Budget $ Over/(Under) Budget glom 1,018,780 $ (198,136) 1,018,780 (198,136) 691,720 (335,817) 327,060 (204,408) 1,018,780 (540,225) 342,089 $ - $ 342,089 See accompanying accountants' report. TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU CITY MARKETING FUND For the Nine Month Period Ending November 30, 2010 Income City Funding Total Income Expense Advertising / Marketing Total Expense Net Income Actual Thru 11/30/10 Annu.IIL. 10,039 $ 10,039 10,039 10,039 Ilt et $ Over/(Under) Budget 40,000 $ (29,961) 40,000 (29,961) 40,000 (29,961) 40,000 (29,961) Deferred Revenue From 2010/11 Applied to Expenses Occurring in March to November 2010 Total Amount of Expense Related to 2010/11 Year Was $10,039. See accompanying accountants' report. 7 At Feb 28, 2010 FR Ef3 &3 O Lnk 00 00 n in m 00 V4 4 'ir 14, o. 01 o n 00 oo Total Income 00 00 0 0 M C d+ 1! 1-4 00 N 1-44 tO .54 • bo H Nt.W Uu to f D U OD 5 0J cu W U 0 d d '0 z At Feb 28, 2010 Mar '09 - Feb '10 0 3 et M H ba 1 ra OD 0 ec v g a. W u W 0al x IV U aQ 1 -r E- w °-� 0 o Q) N Z O U ea tiD b 0 N •v U y 0 Olo W O � O N ts E w x o m *1-‘ o H D iy 0 z N fR 0 rn N Total Income 0 ti ki 3 a� Ca 1 0 rrn N O O 0 in- L• su CN a cu CJ F5 O N N eti O 1-4O f O tom O a) cis .5 • N o d m b F+ O 0 cu zu" g o fJl Mar '10 - Feb 11 W N. Q O O n O (00 ((00 h (00 co S m co csi S 0 0 co 0 m O 0( 65,860 74,048 N. • 0 10 0 0 p0 0 p0p 0 0 S 0 10 0 0 (D CO 01p O V O S (mD O) coVof O ▪ ▪ O N r N of V V r (D N V g o 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 co S O • 0 N 0 0 • r N 0 r M N (9 M ro CO N Ed kr 0 O OOOOOO O (0 r 0 ? O O N 0 pV000 co of 6 O 100_ 10 S �T O O N O 0 N w (O N N N c N (0 c (1) vYi CO " O • O O N O W § 00 3 m N N M N Ol (0D a 0 2 0 0 0 8 S S S 0 0 1� 0 0 V 0 O N 0 CO 10 CD 00) ((1) N N < o Pl (7 IDD V 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 p0 0 S S co (0000 V 0 0 N O CO 0) 0 (( N N l7 M 7 co- o - 0 m 0 0O CO O pO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol r 0 Q O O N O 0 0 (00 10 N N r M r 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 1(DD ((1 (00 00 7 0 0 N O m 01 P1 V r N N N NOD O) 11m� CO W 0 v 0 0 0 0 0 p0 0 0 S - (0 (D 0 V 0 0 N O CO CO CO Obi S r N a- Cr) r W 0) C CN 0 E h 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 f0 CO N N N N r 10 f0 1v. Q�0 0 0 0 0 O O (1 CO (n m 0 v 0 0 N O o 10 S 1 V c N N N of o • S 0 0 0 O S S O O 0O 1. • 10 (0 " O V O O N 1D O O p (0 OO) 10 r N 10 co N (7 '7 co Total Income Promotional Items Trade Show Participation Travel & Entertainment m 0 W 444 Total Expenses I4I I�I IZI l0l 00ss4 N 0 `° (44 Q 0 0 0 0 25 0 uu0 0 a N as O Y1 O sr N e O 0 pOp 0 0 O O O O Q N c0 O O 0 O O 00 N O S N 0 0 0 O O co 8 N O 0 O O N 8 N Ol O 8 0 0 0) O 0 o u0) $ o N O r O 0 8 Membership Dues O Merchandise Sales O Sales -Publications 0 CD CO U) IO 0) 12,500 16,500 N -c N Q 0 0 O 8 N (p X V h co v vi 0 11 m e ) u) 8 8 m 8 01 C 2 0 0 O C i • AdvertlsIng-Web.@e Event Hosting, Industry Sales Event Hosting, Local Community 8 N g CO g n co Y CO ID 0 u1 0 tV NQ Q N Q ^ co g Q + V N- CO N Sr n ID CO N R ' O n t0 CO N Promotional Items Operating Cost Telecommunications O a b O p Y) u7l m 0 8 I(0 N N 0 +qIN 0) llul 0 Total Expenses O r • m mNbbl UM 8a W®8^bbRb b og �m^o®8Co ��®o MUMMER o - o��o o _ _m ono m8mmw8 mo = EL, ta ®rr mm Him oir rv- P m NN mm mn.dtira mumiP mm PP �.i mmNm pl m �f m ol� m REMAR Ertl mPbb Nmm�nP W P F'EMcNai_N EPEAE _E ESU F^EmM$o ommq'72Eq E ER2i3, f l a EMIR NN r r r m Nni r .4 .ivi 88 <V EFIE mfe b»mamsrrN Cmi 253f »ED Nfm E8 EE WM E,TEHE Efb bmmomrrq $8 ®EW'mHmEE Minn N m Pr RER5N<ES mNm Eo WE r®mm�N Fag�m®o °�P� 88 �® a Pyr DEME b o s� r�EM®a asa�EP�w� 88 Qgvmm® vNo mP m m m NN N r v- 1 my m PP n ati nim �PPrvm 1 R _ r M ER f *IAM eo $< rti�am% _o »Wo o�Vb vbiP ubi�N RR Nnmwm ® _ _ _ _ �" I� h Nm cN m P NN P rq P m m PP N an Vv PP m Q m EE 1mdry m m»NN EE P mbmE m m NN c ErTEH8 »Q EME P'MR Quo ER8 mMm 1E �Mi 1,:4 m r E m E N v vcri Naim POESe N v` P 86 bV mbme m Ekf26'NFA oe MNmvt®8 O PaP m I� n b Visitors' Bureau R o V �m EER EH, MmmEYmP'N�y EF N Pm$ HA -PR r NN N r PP m mm P oo m b N 6 b WU �V[m9 HMV -3. ME RE uFNm�l� EE 'NN$®m NN NN r N � � m n w mN EEE WE If oe m N m P- (fN m Mm EE $ c V F m E m E M �m V m P' tE N N R m N P O EE P m m 8 ofD 0 I -I to 5 O c a V m y LL 0 3 C Wm w , o W $o2a O F N U a 0 0 0 0 Income Funding 0 00 o I • o o o O vv 0 00 o oo o o o 0 00 Nr vv Total Income Advertising - Media Trade Show Participation 0 0 0 0 Total Expense m 0 u 1.111111111111 000, 11 0.00 0 01010 i,10100,101 .10 111,10 0,1 011111111111)100 r. - A 0 8L = § 11111111111111111 00000000000000000;,, )U1 Jho 6. HOME PAGE *** l 7. NOTES Tue 9/7 EXPIRES 10/17 Komen N/A Labor Day is Mon 9/6 Mon 10/18 N/A Labor Day is Mon 9/6 Mon 11/8 or Sooner EXPIRES _ 12/ N/A Mon 11/29 Thanksgiving is Th 11/25 EXPIRES Fri 12/31 Mon 11/29 Thanksgiving is Th 11/25 EXPIRES Sun 1/2 Mon 1/3 Christmas is Sat 12/25 EXPIRES Mon 2/28 New Years is Sat 1/1 Mon 1/24 Valentine's Day is Mon 2/14 EXPIRES Tue 2/15 N/A Thanksgiving Th 11/25 Tue 2/22 New Years is Sat 1/1 EXPIRES after BG Fest1 MLK Jr. Day is Mon 1/17 N/A Mon 3/21 Est BG FESTSatSun3/19-20 EXPIRES after W Days Est W Days SatSun 5/14-15 N/A President's Day is M 2/21 Mon 5/16 Est Jazz Fst SatSun7/16-17 EXPIRES after Jazz Fest ALL Mon 7/11 Mon 7/18 7/18 HP Calendar Features EXPIRES Labor Day WkE OT Fri Nites & TVIFF Press Release DISTRIBUTION ** A) TemecutaCV8.r n/media/press-releases; B) News Blast:Travel Writers (Carolyn's list procedure) + MSWord doc and link; C) Post iftwa.com; D) PR Web Web Von for Consumers LINKED from HOME PAGE *** SeasonalFest graphic on Home Page links to content. Confirming content/punctuation w/ MS Word doc can help w/ ac -curacy 5. DISTRIBUTION ** ALL Tue 8/3 ALL Wed 10/6 ALL Tue 10/12 All but PRWeb Tue 9/7 ALL Mon 10/18 6 weeks lead time ALL Mon 11/15 ALL Mon 11/29 ALL Mon 11/29 ALL Mon 1/3 ALL Mon 1/24 All but PRWeb M 12/6 90 day lead time ALL Tue 1/18 45 day lead time ALL Mon 2/14 ALL Mon 3/7 All but PRWeb M 2/27 90 day lead time ALL Mon 4/4 60 day lead time ALL Mon 5/16 4. DRAFT to K Tue 7/27 Tue 9/28 Mon 10/4 V1 Mon 8/23 V2 Mon 10/11 oo 1 C 2 V1 Mon 11/22 V1 Mon 11/22 V2 Tue 12/21 e-1 V1 Mon 11/29 V2 Tue 1/11 N Mon 2/28 V1 Tue 2/22 V2 Mon 3/28 Mon 5/9 Tue 7/6 3. DIRECTION Week of 7/19 Week of 8/30 or b-4 Week of 9/20 or b-4 Week of 8/9 or b-4 Week of 10/4 or b-4 Week of 10/25 or b-4 Week of 11/1 or b-4 Week of 11/1 or b-4 Week of 12/13 Week of 1/3 Week of 11/15 or b-4 Week of 1/3 Week of 1/24 or b-4 Week of 2/14 or b-4 Week of 2/7 or b-4 Week of 3/21 or b-4 Week of 4/25 or b-4 Things To Do Week of 6/21 or b-4 2. STORY Announcement People Things To Do Announcement V1 Announcement V2 N O. O G! Q. New Year's Eve Things To Do V1 Things To Do V2 Valentine's Day Announcement V1 Announcement V2 Q 0 G7 a Things To Do Announcement V1 Announcement V2 W O. 0 Gl a 1. SEASON A. AutumnFest 2010 SEPT, OCT, NOV Wed 9/8 to Wed 11/24 Autumn begins Th 9/23 Thanksgiving is Th 11/25 0 N O N N m O N u_ CO LL LI z O :31Q In w ❑ a-1 am i_>c..)ze0- N ami I- C •— .0 L Christmas is Sat 12/25 New Years is Sat 1/1 MLK Jr. Day is Mon 1/17 Pres's Day is Mon 2/21 C. SpringFest 2011 MAR, APR, MAY Tue 3/01 to Tue 5/31 Spring begins Sun 3/20 Easter Sun 4/24 Mother's Day Sun 5/8 Memorial Day Mon 5/30 D. SummerFest 2011 JUN, JULY, AUG Wed 6/1 to Wed 9/7 Father's Day Sun 6/19 Summer begins Tue 6/21 Independence Day M 7/4 Labor Day Mon 9/5 TVCVB FISCAL 2010-2011 TRADE SHOW RECAP # Attendees *Est. Staff Hours Nv 0 2.1 Planner Trade Shows 2 O O 30 N ID -c 0 C CO 0 c m s,11 a m L E E m 3 A -452 Q O 0.w m 422W -4S E c Q 0-=,_0 c . v o i 3 v gv v c 3 c � N m m 1O$ O v 0 0 a 03 O e ; o y � `w m c m c E E 0 15 w E H N E-= = H m v a g5 -2u u vm n U 42m a H N — ?,:327, C 15 p+ 0 2.13 m v _c c n u N .490= o c E > > 2 w E °> s. V! 0 0 m 0 0 IO N O m N O co N Oo 0 0 0 W N e-1 .-i O. L d -C C 0 wm `>u2m o`g — c p m n E a 0 a> .,, c m Q c m.-'v oa... c E Y Uc m55 m25maE .EO22 IxC Wwu�NVC NLmm msmCOLL 0 §s-5, mem„,.. _r01> i c UUHMit”! yng0« ^'~LO C 1073', .2:� r-121141.1.4.! m� 3 m v !!!:!0N0a==0 0 1,1 ▪ YUPn L ICO 1O?m C O m« MIA 5 ~ E t :a, c Q 3 w,„. ...E m m m-59.1,117,115 s v 013v d0a r`m r::"1111 gm cY v3 .u▪ c =3 0o .y c0p E>Emm ri Y - O.0.. Eao cm Eo1ccO c0Npa- m vOO'a1 y c .., o0C -0 cLLHMI ` LL EOccE °A1522- er2_acE;! vwo_ ;WI lEEc`EoEmon 0 z -r, oaCmwma32 v . ma0c m2=gm ;-mo aE-oOE cO0 E y •+ C N d m`aca EE c« v m a Epm N a NCFmCCm— S L -E° E 8 Ln ill N N N O O a W O NE; =N 0 Successful Meetings N O b L} c Y � E E„ Q _ z E 3 0 0 299 o E N Q 7.27? -27.113"E p N v- J �^ C ` y 01 :842-8 p 0 0 t m m✓ n? CO S 0 a W o- m e m c>N t 3 ° w u,12m-cam E N t1 E 3 L m N Emoizg0E25 U p C C C CO u m .o m E - O w a E N° v o' u m 0 C 0 00 .0 9 E v c p E m m pa 0 0 0 0 p- m E v $ v « 14.210/ ▪ o Y v E .0 ti E 1 0 ,0.. /m. co m a e c y v n G- M -S m a O a 0 r = m 0 x 9 m c a> E E m 1° E y 3 w m' °� t c mi' r w S tw m m O C C E 0 Ia3ac8L9 — C 0 •O m 7°11' C m E_ L 0 w Et -.52 mm93N c v ma E. 0.> G w 0 t co t a 0.0 n c a 3„ 3 0-.E. 9 E 89 m N M O pOp O 14 n 0) N O O n ry .-1 ti ;I OO 1" 0 0▪ -= m “°, m m m 0 N 0 N 8 N O 4L 01 (00 Smart Meetings- The Smart Mart Smart Meetings -The Smart Meeting w O t a m Prepared by Leslie Mercado, Director of Sales Revision Date 11/15/10 TVCVB FISCAL 2010-2011 TRADE SHOW RECAP EEI From Leads ! ! k # tendees *Est. staff Hours § 0 2 k -4 ■ © 8 § mm k k EC k/, k\41 coE41 n 0 0 21 EN to 00 if /d 0 2 Bridal Shows erator Shows 0 0 01 k � § w Prepared by Leslie Mercado, Director of Sales Revklon Date 11/15/10 TVCVB FISCAL 2010-2011 TRADE SHOW RECAP EEI From Leads # Staff # Partners # Attendees *Est. 5 el 0 0 1 to N tt 1 Trade Shows Tota E E Q 0 0 o m J N r 0 H t m o m Z NJ o 0 L7 3 W 4 m y 01 m cv 0.- 3 o x oN in W v G 00 E CC 4-3 H v N W Q C �� d 7 ._° 1 W E u w c ;: I; 0 TRADE SHOW AND MAR Prepared by Leslie Mercado, Director of Sales Revision Date 11/15/10 MEDS. OBJECTIVES Target Audience • Corporate Travel- Individual and Group • Meetings Markets • Leisure Travel Demographic/Psychographic • Adults 35-64 • Weekday traveler 1,46 Geography • The Primary Trade area includes Los Angeles and Orange County for Leisure travel • National and International for Meetings Market Objectives The primary objective is to increase hotel room sales at all hotels throughout Temecula. Strategy/Tactics • Support each season (Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter) with a combination of print, online, social media and direct marketing. • Leverage the Temecula Valley Southern California Wine Country brand by creating a series of advertising campaigns for online and print. • Increase online effectiveness through the use of new creative technology called "Spongecell." This allows traditionally static banner ads to come "alive" for interaction. These can include event calendars, short sizzle videos, hotel booking options and relevant content for the online viewer. Spongecell provides a "lift" to traditional flash ad click -through that ranges from 20-60%. • Create a social media plan and playbook for Twitter and Facebook. BUDGET ALLOCATION Social Media Print Direct Marketing Online Marketing Trade Show Marketing Creative Strategy and Design (Includes ad campaign concepts Spongecell and banner ad design) TOTAL 2 % Allocation 11.0 16.0 7.0 49.0 4.5 12.5 Budgeted Dollars $19,791.00 $28,173.00 $13,052.00 $87,137.00 $ 8,148.00 $22,508.00 100.0% $178,809 �h� �flfinu ,;O0uii )1 H SOCIAL MEDIA Ark Marketing will continue to increase audience engagement in existing social media outlets. A suggested campaign has been created under separate cover. Highlights of the plan include the following: • Build Facebook tabs • Update the `look' and `feel' of the Facebook page and offer multiple interaction opportunities • Provide all travel and information for the region • Engage audiences via monthly contest on Facebook and Twitter • Enter the location based social space via Foursquare • Create and execute Facebook ads • Feature a "Business of the Week" Once these upgrades and enhancements have been achieved, we will take the social media venue to the next level through collaboration with Petra Consulting. Working with Petra Consulting, Ark Marketing will assess the current social media offerings of the Temecula CVB and determine a plan to increase their social media effectiveness. The project will begin by completing a social media audit report, creating a social media engagement plan and playbook, and providing ongoing monthly success coaching and implementation. The Engagement Plan and Playbook includes a listening plan, social media playbook, social media outreach and metrics for each defined target segment. I.e.; wedding market, sports market, business traveler, meetings market, etc. The social media playbook will include an improvement opportunity with specific recommendations and content examples to help increase effectiveness of the designated social media properties. Included in the recommendations are time involved, tools to use and a three-month calendar excel spreadsheet with daily posts. Monthly trends will be tracked along with impact measurements. Real-time feedback will be provided on social media conversations with ideas on building more targeted relationships while energizing fans and influencers. PRINT Leisure Market A very limited amount of print is planned for this fiscal year through cooperative opportunities with the California Travel and Tourism Commission (CTTC), Sunset 3 uk V71`Uirk 'HT DVV`c diod;��DP�°� Magazine and the Inland Empire CVB. All of these opportunities connect the TVCVB with national and international leisure markets in a cost-efficient manner. CTTC- CMG Fall/Spring In November 2010- a special 24 -page California section will be inserted into the following U.S. magazines: • Travel+ Leisure- 150,000 circ. • Budget Travel- 200,000 circ. • Food & Wine- 200,000 circ. National Geographic Traveler- 150,000 circ. (Magazine inserts will target upscale households in key Western U.S. states along with select opportunity markets in other regions of the U.S.) Canada Newspaper Inserts: • Vancouver Sun- 100,000 circ. • Calgary Herald- 100,000 circ. • Edmonton Journal- 100,000 circ. • Toronto Star- 100,000 TOTAL CIRCULATION- 1,100,000 Sunset Magazine- SoCal Insider Sunset Magazine publishes a special section, four times a year, called "SoCal Insider." This section targets the most affluent readers in the Southern California area. In the November 2010 issue- Sunset focuses on the Annual Wine Awards, providing the perfect platform to deliver Temecula's unique message- the Southern California Wine Country. This year, Sunset Magazine will be writing and featuring an editorial about wine country within the SoCal Insider section. The TVCVB ad will be part of a full Temecula page that includes the TVWA, California Dreami_n and Pechanga as partners. This full-page ad will be surrounded by relevant editorial and will be seen by almost 525,000 readers through a circulation of 136,000. California Official State Visitors Guide & Travel Planner- 2011 Inland Empire Tourism Council Co-op Advertising Program Travelers turn to the guide throughout the year for its lifestyle -focused editorial and inviting design elements that make it easy to use. It inspires readers to explore and gives them fresh ideas on where to go and what to do with precious leisure time. Specific travel information is organized throughout each of the 12 California Tourism regions, and the print Guide works hand-in-hand with the VisitCalifornia.com web site. 9 hrhhh hr, As the main fulfillment piece for the CTTC's $50 million advertising budget, The California Official State Visitors Guide & Travel Planner is distributed world-wide and year-round, January — December each year. • 450,000 copies are distributed upon request in response to the CTTC's print, broadcast and online advertising. • 50,000 copies are distributed on newsstands for $2.99 a copy. • Plus bonus electronic distribution- users access the digital version of the Guide on VisitCalifornia.com all year long. The guide offers lead generation that is emailed bi-weekly throughout the year, enhanced listing in the Inland Empire section (name, address, 20 words, phone and URL), free ad and listing with links in the digital guide at visitcalifornia.com, and heavily discounted co-op rates. Meeting Market Smart Meetings Smart Meetings periodically offers cooperative partnerships with other companies within the Temecula area. This provides the TVCVB with the ability to market through the magazine using the TVCVB branding, while only paying a fraction of the cost. This opportunity was implemented in June 2010 and will be included for February 2011 as well. Smart Meetings- Site Solutions (print and online) The site solution package includes a 1/3 page, 4c ad within the Site Solutions publication -a special Meeting Planner supplement for the West Coast. This supplement is poly -bagged with Smart Meetings magazine and distributed to 31,500 subscribers the first week of December 2010. (Digital reply cards included.) Meeting Professionals International- Northern California. Chapter (MPINCC) The MPI Northern California Chapter is a publication that will be published in October 2010. The chapter includes more than 1,100 members and has been promoting the industry for 30 years. The MPINCC members approve and recommend facilities, products and services to California's leading companies and associations. The TVCVB has purchased a half -page ad in directory. ONLINE Leisure Market Three travel search sites were chosen to market the TVCVB. The focus will be on people planning their trip from Southern California; Los Angeles, Burbank and Orange County. 5 Olson 4y The TVCVB ad will be served up within targeted pages of the planned partnering websites during the time people are making their travel plans. Three different size banner ads will utilized on the travel sites. These include the 300 x 25o rectangle,160 x 600 sky scraper and the 728 x go leader board. Expedia.com The expedia.com flight schedule begins mid-September through mid-February 2011. Ads will be shown on the hotel search tab, the deals and offers tab and the hotel results tab. A total of 1.6 million impressions will be delivered throughout the flight, approximately 550,000 each season. TripAdvisor.com TripAdvisor.com hosts a special Temecula content section where the TVCVB appears. The page provides a picture of Temecula, the website address, the opportunity to email the TVCVB and download the official Visit Temecula guide. The ads will also appear in Special Wine Country content, special Southern California content, wine country with IP addresses in Southern California and throughout the Trip Advisor site for general bonus exposure. The flight will begin mid-September and run through mid-February for a total of 655,684 impressions. Multi Travel and Weather Sites A consortium of 50 travel and weather sites will be purchased as a package for the TVCVB's ads to run. Some sites included are travelandleisure.com, vacation.rentals.com, citysearch.com, foodchannel.com, frommers.com, hotels.com, hotwire.com, travelchannel.com. The flight will begin mid-September and run through mid-February for a total of almost two (2) million impressions. Only those website visitors from Los Angeles and Orange County will be served the ads. CTTC- CMG Fall/Spring As part of the Fall CTTC print campaign package, a new program enhancement launching in spring 2011 will provide the TVCVB the opportunity to showcase the Temecula destination in a highly interactive and engaging format. In addition to expanded advertorial content, including imagery, the TVCVB will be able to feature destination videos, calendars of events and/or itineraries, along with opportunities for consumers to order visitor guides, opt -in to receive destination emails or enter promotional sweepstakes. The CTTC will launch the digital guide with a Geo -targeted email in April/May to one million U.S people and a half -million Canadians. 6 ,aa�ll� auaQaa��,x e:�u as adu;a vv, R dahV' 000 The TVCVB will receive a 2 -page spread in this digital guide in addition to distribution through Zinio.com, the largest e -newsstand in the world. California's digital guide will sit alongside well-known magazines (more than 2,400 titles) and be available for download to consumers for free. The TVCVB will also receive a dedicated email to 25,00o geographically targeted consumers to increase program exposure and allow the TVCVB to customize promotional messaging and timing. Meeting Market Smart Meetings- Site Solutions (print and online) The online portion of the package includes the following: • Site Solution Digital edition emailed out to 38,000 meeting planners in December. • Two group email blasts sent out to 38,000 meeting planners in January and February 2011 with the TVCVB's smart deal. • Four months of Smart Deals to be included in the "Smart Deals" section of the smartmeetings.com website. On the Smartmeetings.com website, there is a section on the bottom right of the home page which features special deals from the featured destination. November 2010— February 2011. • Three months on the Smart Show Case Home Page. A picture with link is included on the home page. Once a visitor clicks the link, they are taken to a full- page micro site that includes information about the destination with live links to hotels, wineries and local tourism opportunities. November 2010, December 2010 and February 2011 I&MI Do -It -Yourself Workbook I&MI online Do -It -Yourself Workbook is used regularly by more than 15,000 registered qualified North American and international subscribers. The international DIY site has been up and running since January 2009. The domestic launch is October 2010. The TVCVB package provides three marketing approaches: 1) The DIY Workbook, 2) Temecula e -booklet and 3) Marketing campaign. The DIY Workbook allows planners to search for a CVB by state. Once the Temecula CVB comes on screen, the TVCVB will have two (2) full pages of information including a Welcome page. These pages can be downloaded to a planner's computer with a single click. (.pdf digital flipbook) An e -booklet will be created for Temecula. This is a self-contained online booklet that focuses on everything to do in Temecula and includes 4-6 other properties in a co-op arrangement. Once IMI has these properties committed to the project, an e -booklet will be created. These booklets are available for download to the planners desktop and are one of the most popular downloaded sections on the DIY website. The e -booklets are 7 HH?Ho, liAmon also emailed worldwide to over 14,000 registered meeting planners and MICE buyers through the IMI web marketing. The marketing campaign will include one email blast to the 14,000 IMI email subscribers with information about Temecula. Quarterly, the TVCVB will also be included in the IMI newsletter with relevant event and hospitality information. Meetings West The Meetings West website meetingsfocus.com is a premiere B to B content provider serving the meetings, convention and incentive market. It features destination articles, news and events, property listings, hot deals, educational and custom webinars, and videos. Meetingsfocus.com concentrates on attracting quality traffic by actively bringing the magazine subscribers online directly from the e -newsletters, promotions and webinar invitations. The monthly page views are 56,391 with 18,113 unique visitors. On the home page of the site, there is a "featured profile" section on the bottom right hand side. The TVCVB will be one of the featured destinations. Once a planner clicks on the link, it takes them to a page of information about Temecula. This includes an overview of Temecula, its properties, meeting space availability, a map of the area and any other relevant data. The website also offers a double -wide skyscraper ad (300 x 600) that runs throughout the site. A total of 8,000 impressions are guaranteed monthly and will run three specific months: October 2010, December 2010 and February 2011. DIRECT MARKETING- EMAIL Refer a Friend Campaign The "Refer a Friend" email campaign will be created to gather new email addresses and increase the number of people that are exposed to Temecula offerings. Contest Description An email is sent out to the TVCVB database asking people to refer a friend. Those who participate are sent to a landing page designed and hosted by Eagle Marketing to give the email addresses of their friends. For each name they provide, they are entered to win a monthly and grand prize (two referral names, two prize entries). They are also given an immediate prize of a 2for1 wine tasting coupon. The referred friends are then sent an email with a custom subject line (Audrey Patterson referred you )And those people receive a newly written email inviting them to join the TVCVB database, refer to their friends and visit Temecula. The eblasts will be sent out on 9/22,10/20 and 11/17/10. Prize for referring a friend: one free wine tasting coupon ($10.00 value) 8 �aAuaH Hs Monthly Prizes: Month 1: The Grapeline Wine tour and picnic lunch ($200.00 value), Month 2: hot air balloon ride ($300.00), Month 3: round of golf for 6 ($350.00 value) Grand Prize: 2 night stay, wine tasting, hot air balloon ride, dining coupon ($710.00 value) cxFaTISE Creative Strategy- PaintVox, Inc./ProsFromDover The branding guidelines are quite complete from the standpoint of brand presentation. However a communication platform is needed based on A. Target Audience B. Reason to believe C. Unique campaign device(s) D. Interpretation of guidelines into tangible and ownable advertising campaigns E. Competitive set (looking at what other options people have, and finding a way to put Temecula into the competitive set) Deliverables include 4-6 campaign concepts presented with copy and visuals in both print and online. Each campaign concept includes two-four ads represented in both print and online. For example, if PaintVox comes up with five (5) concepts, they may show three (3) executions for both print and online for each of the five concepts for a total of 3o visual ideas. Once the concepts are agreed upon, these concepts are then turned into actual online and print ads moving forward. Spongecell Spongecell is a new technology that allows online banner ads to come "alive." Spongecell provides interactive ad technology that converts engagement to participation. It helps advertisers increase engagement by creating ads that make it easy for messages to flow into calendars, mobile devices, social networks and email inboxes right from the ad unit. By offering more options than just a click through to move past engagement, Spongecell increases the yield from each impression. The TVCVB will be able to run their ads using the Spongecell technology for up to 3 million impressions. TRADE SHOW MARKETING Several of the trade shows offer marketing opportunities to talk to their attendees before, during and after the show. Opportunities consist of pre and post mailing lists, social media, promotional events, sponsorships and special signage. Each trade show is unique in its offerings and will be evaluated as information becomes available. A separate trade show list with opportunities is under separate cover. 9 F L MEDIA FLOWCH TEMECULA VALLEY CVB 2010-2011 FISC f10000 00000000100 000000' 1111111 J�ll�r°'�% I I1r�1l111�r' in 0 1 oloo IYI � wnW�nrdnu�� 1111.11111111111111111111111111111 flhlIIIIIIIIliiIIl��IN� !I@NI@I1I911111 2I W 7 TEMECULA VALLEY CVS 2010-2011 FISCAL MEDIA FLOWCHART ®® H 111101111 1111111111„ a 0 40 0 010 oil1111.. o INR71.1 I I�p I I I p 1 I: ul 1, 111111.1011111!!111 • 1414 •4 1•1111 11 O. IIII III II 1 II IIII hI III III �IIII m 1111111 1111111 �� 11111.1111111. IIII� �� VIII ��, IIII, II IIII IIII ,�I OUNTRY Convention and Visitors Bureau 2010 saw the Sales Department of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau increase its activity from sales prospecting to trade shows attended. The increased efforts saw substantial rewards when it came to hotel occupancy, demand and revenue. Hotel room occupancy increased 4.2% over 2009 to 59.9%, with a de- mand for rooms increasing over 9% to 414,529 hotel rooms booked. Revenue also saw a healthy increase, up 5.7% to $38,408,440. Leads processed through the Sales Department also saw increases over 2009 for a total of 50 leads proc- essed, valued at $2,019,467. Of those leads, 21 became "Definite" bookings for an estimated economic impact of $190,638. Eight of the Leads remain "Active" and the TVCVB is working vigorously to actualize the business. The TVCVB continues to research new markets and increase interest in the Temecula Valley as a Leisure, Group, Corporate Meetings and Special Events Destination. January 2010 • Processed 4 leads with an estimated Economic Impact of $39,000 • Processed 1 definite booking with an Economic Impact of $9,200 • Sent out "Save the Date" to 175 meeting planners, tour operators and media for Spring FAM Tour April 8-10, 2010 • Sent post -show follow-ups to 72 planners from CaISAE trade show • Attended RCMA trade show in Ft. Worth, TX. Made 40 new contacts and working on 5 sales leads • Arranged site tour for Trilogy Financial Services • E -blast invitation to 4,500 potential leisure guests for upcoming LA Times & Travel Show February 2010 • Processed 4 leads with an estimated Economic Impact of $13,000 • Processed 2 definite bookings with Economic Impact of $5,300 • Sent out "Save the Date" to 100 additional meeting planners, tour operators and media for Spring FAM Tour April 8-10, 2010 • Sent post -show follow-ups to 43 planners from RCMA trade show • Attended LA Times Travel Show with 20,000 attendance. Distributed 2,500 visitor guides and maps and collected 300 emails • Processed 3 meeting planner requests via website • E -blast invitation to 1,620 meeting planners inviting them to visit our booth at the MPISCC trade show March 2010 • Processed 4 leads with estimated Econ. Impact of $46,417 • Processed 2 definite bookings with Econ. Impact of $6,420 • Sent out 280 FAM invitation to meeting planners, tour operators and media for Spring FAM Tour April 8-10, 2010 • Attended MPISCC Trade Show in Los Angeles • Sent post -show follow-ups to 15 planners from MPISCC show • Attended OC's Largest Mixer at the Orange County Fairgrounds. Distributed over 500 visitor guides and maps • Processed 6 meeting planner requests via website • Conducted Sales Task Force meetings and discussed planning of Spring FAM and upcoming sales efforts April 2070 • Processed 3 leads with estimated Econ. Impact of $556,310 • Processed 2 definite bookings with Econ. Impact of $8,613 • Held Spring FAM Tour April 8-10, 2010. Entertained 55 Meeting Planners and guests • Attended MPI San Diego Educational Conference & Trade Show • Sent post -show follow-ups to 6 planners from MPI San Diego trade show • Attended Successful Meetings University in Monterey with 16 scheduled appointments with targeted Meeting Planners • Processed I meeting planner request via website • Attended Sales Task Force meeting/Post Con for Spring FAM May 2070 • Processed 9 leads with estimated Econ. Impact of $276,998 • Processed I definite booking with Econ. Impact of $21,930 • E -blast sent to over 1,300 meeting planners promoting upcoming sales trade shows • Attended MPI Orange County Educ. Conference & Trade Show • Twitter E -blast to over 1,500 meeting planners, netting 30 new Twitter followers • Processed 5 meeting planner requests via website • Addition of new Sales Intern for the summer • 101 f June 2010 • Processed 13 leads with estimated Econ. Impact of $445,627 V I w i • Processed 2 definite bookings with Econ. Impact of $35,325 • E -blast sent to over 1,500 meeting planners inviting them to attend Af- fordable Meetings West trade show • Held Sales Happy Hour Event at The Bank—Mexican Restaurant • Held planning meeting for "Temecula on the Road" FAM trip • Attended Affordable Meetings West trade show in Long Beach; currently working on 5 RFP's obtained from the show • Processed 2 meeting planner requests via website July 2010 • Processed 6 leads with estimated Econ. Impact of $120,664 • Processed 2 definite bookings with Econ. Impact of $10,974 • E -blast sent to over 1,600 meeting planners, travel agents & media invit- ing them to Temecula On the Road event • Attended Sales Meetings with sales teams from Pechanga, Temecula Creek Inn & Embassy Suites • Held planning meeting for "Temecula on the Road" FAM trip • Attended MPI World Education Congress trade show in Vancouver, Canada; working on 7 leads obtained from the show • Held planning meeting for "Temecula on the Road" FAM trip • Attended MPI World Education Congress trade show in Vancouver, Canada; working on 7 leads obtained from the show August 2010 • Processed 1 lead with estimated Econ. Impact of $184,000 • E -blast sent to over 1,600 meeting planners, travel agents & media invit- ing them to Temecula On the Road event • Held Temecula On the Road FAM Tour in Orange County • Attended Successful Meetings Smart Mart in Orange County with 15 one -on-one appointments with meeting planners • Attended ASAE 20t0 Volunteer Orientation Meeting & Final Evening Event in LA • Attended Pechanga luncheon for TID Hotels • Attended HSMAI Meeting Planner Panel Luncheon in LA • Held Sales Task Force Meeting September 2010 • Processed 2 leads with estimated Economic Impact of $8,560 • Processed 3 Definite Bookings with an estimated Economic Impact of $39,341 • Sent E -Newsletter to 1,540 meeting & event planners U� !IfkIP� 1.IIFOIwRNit WINE COUNTRY Convention and Visitors Bureau • E -blast sent to over 870 area travel agents inviting them to the Mini Travel & Trade Shows in Riverside, Orange County and San Diego • Attended sales meeting at Pechanga Resort &Casino • Attended Passkey/GroupMax and MeetingMax Webinars • Participated at Urban Land Institute member reception at South Coast Winery Resort & Spa • Attended Successful Meetings Trade Show in Scottsdale, AZ, with 20 one-on-one appointments with meeting planners • Held Sales Happy Hour at The Edge Restaurant & Lounge • Participated at Mini Travel & Trade Shows in Riverside, Orange Count and San Diego and met with over 100 travel agents October 2010 • Processed 1 lead with estimated Economic Impact of $8,140 • Processed 2 Definite Bookings with an estimated Economic Impact of $5,742 • Attended meeting with Joy Sarolia of Quality Inn • Fulfilled 1 online Meeting Planner Guide Request • Added 1,463 new Sales Prospect Accounts to the CRM • Added 1,818 new Sales Prospect Contacts to the CRM • Followed up on 24 CRM Sales Accounts • Attended staff budget re -cap and budget planning meeting November 2010 • E -blast sent to over 1,500 meeting & event planners promoting upcoming trade shows: Seasonal Spectacular, RCMA World Conference Expo, Go West Summit & MPI Northern California Chapter Annual Conference & Expo • Held Sales Task Force meeting • Attended Passkey/GroupMax meeting • Attended MPI So. Cal. Chapter monthly Educational meeting • Held TID Advisory Board Planning Session and TID Advisory Board Review Session • Continue to add new sales and contact prospects to the CRM • Prospected 15 accounts from the CRM December 2010 • Processed 3 Leads with estimated Economic Impact of $605,844 • Processed 3 Definite Bookings with estimated Economic Impact of $45,010 • Attended CaISAE Seasonal Spectacular Trade Show • Sent E -Blast to 10,000 Leisure Travelers and Meeting Planners promoting upcoming events and trade shows Fiscal Activity Report Year 2010 pip ti o o L NN o o N m 0 0 in *� 0 00 N 0 a0 C .m. N Ina N 0 N 0 if,0 N ID N 1� O L L i1 7 U December M 0 0 a N 0 0 N ti N 0 0 CO 0 N 0 m 0 0 NN N (0 0 m O N ^ m M 0 .-I a N 0 N 0 ti O m m 0 N O .i m V O 0 Q w-9 CO •� N N 0 N 0 O N N (y 0 a L o 0 o 0 .ii 0 0 .fi o 0 o 0 y 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 .0 N E al o .y o Ny z torsi N O N o 0 o 0 0 it 0 0 .-I 0 0 .-1 0 0 o 0 n N d .0 d c o a LI N o (0 w N I. 0 m m m O I0 ti N O N .moi N 0 O N M 0 0 m m E m i 0. 0. O1 0 0 N o o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .+ 0 0 .y 0 0 O 0 m 0 7 in p1 O 7 N 4 ›ii N o 0 N a1 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 1n .-1 o ID 0 0 o 0 7 0 7 N .I ,� N m 01 o, 0 C o ry o N 0 0.. 0 o N 0 N 0 O1 m -+ N 0 m In ID m iin n 7 N N N N a 00 D1 N M N m om 1�0 .+ 0 0 .i 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 m. 0 01 m O o in m 0 ri .i 0 ry M .D M .-- .a 01 - N 0- .`I" N 0 No o O0 O o Oat o 00o M 0 O M 0 0 O In m 0 N 0. 0 10 R1 N N 10 4 .-1 N ny 41, Co' N C=7 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 O O in 0 .y M 0 a O a 0 7 N L m d ta a i a Z. N 0 0 No 0 0 sa ^ O o Of 7 L a 111LL 0 0 .i 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 A C n ai dr 10 ui a m 10 0 0 0a 0 m ., 0 a m 0 0 .. N O O Total Bookings E i �° 0z y 'u' N N q OI C1 W O) O 0 10 d 82 cn (0 tea' m 01 014, I- N �a C L L t� C E if a vl C Ez la -.2 I.> Ti 0: io HD &I Total Delegates .. 7 01 E a J M.;56; 2y z E v J 2. L wv )0 E To Z M U'O 0 O O U z 0 E rno0_) 3 rnE'��°v1n� � s E cQ ; yl�r - i+ U (C0 W E H 0W H j Ez FO-. N WJ HZ Meeting Sales Held W In N c 0 01 0 O) E0 on 0 0 0 0 0, N NI tl•IAZ WI NI rn 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 01 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 b2 0Ly 6 4 0 0o 0 1t-; itm 2 e ." - 8 2 g „-V, 0, I,. a E w 0 10, 0 0 Definite Group Rooms N E O O CC -0 O 0 0 m 0 0 0 r-1 O 0 0 0 00 LD N 0 r-1 0 N 01 0 0 N 00 0 0 N N 0 0 N LO 0 0 N Group Room Revenue E 0 0 = v 0 > a1 (9 cc o 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0Ln 0 OO Ln OO Ln N N r -I r-1 -V)- -0- ih i4 -JI- 0 60 Group Leads Processed Group Leads o 000 0 0 O 0 cPo oc, onommossommossommossommoifill11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111„„1111„„, I, II I I 11111111 „„„ „„„. -,,,,ififilli11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 '1111111 ' 111:3 11111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii111111.11iorionn:111.11111111.4111.11.1.1.11.1.111.1.1.1.IIIIII.1111 oll.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.11011clifiiii0(1i0,10,01110111101, 0i0d01,10,111,111ipihrftoi0111111111(1111111oloolopl000„IlloolLooLoopiIiipoo '111,11111,1,1,11',111,101101111,11,110.1111101111010101011111101plifir *400 : • •"-1'..;•' p a 11111111111111 Westways Access Temecula somethingbluemag.com SomethingBlue.com Digital Billboards on 1-10 and 1-15 Freeways .0',0140.00.-00000:00 Paul Rodgers Vertical Iiorizon Gin Blossoms Jimmy Wayne Tho Band Perry ortisilelp 4 d 000000 0 010 rSprroyra „ I AFFORDABLE SPLURGE STAY 81 PLAY STARtlING AT inum1111111111111111111111111111111l oOfmorrio 01"1""1""1""1"loolooluillii[ • •••••• .„•• „,•„.„„„,, •••'. •iiii••••••••:••••••::,••''''••••••":•:„. 4:01414 CO44:44 Startingfi.ont $ iiPT•• 000:0000000000000000:00 111111111ml . „1„1,1,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11,11 •iiii•••••11 1111111001'0000000.11: 1:111(.11.1111„11.1, 00000001111111111111111111P11110.,/,. I , • 1s1.1111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111.. NU! '14,11111,1,11,111,1,1:.11111,H,11 111o1111111111i I, • 01,1141 44:41040. III0111,":1111:11:111:11r California Roadtrips • .., „......„,„„„,„„,„,„„vv„„v• • • ....,..... •• ,n110000:„ ',,'VVV„V'1V1V1111.1V1.1:0000V'0000V'VVV'V'V'VVVV'Vilv(1111101iIIIIII,V1,I,VV11,11,I,I,vv.vvvvvvv.v.0,vv„,v,;vv,vv,,vv,,vv,,vvv'vvv0vvvvvvJ,I„,,V'0!01,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvRv,.,V1V1V10Vvvvvvvvvvvvvyvvvvvvvvvvvvv,vvvvvvvvvv1,vvVvvv,V1VVV1V,11,VV111,1,VVVVVVVIVVV,VVIVV,V(111v1vv101V101,VVVVV Smart Meetings Co -Op ,.„ '..:tgraINI!!!1)!I!!!!!!!1111111411111101111,; " !OOPS v,,,,vv,vvv,„vv.v.v„.„1.0.110,1,10,0f,4,0,4),,,,14,,vv,100000000101,00°00,00'. V00,71000 00m00110000000111100010000m01 °°' 01,1,1001,10000vIvi'°"11100101101001101110 TVUSD Fundraising Ad °0° 010°11,0040,000 1/01 vvi v 0111 , $1.4 1.414n. A 01[11 IV fv,001,101MO4' '1°0 0,U0i ;11"100i 0110010 "i 00000100110001" 10000000000 • ,lorA ft.num0.14.1144,4 11rno...M11 10,m, avnmpl, ' 000.0•000.0040000000004.0•004,00.0, 1‘747.: AV44.11,, IhP.0,41"01. [ Planners Choice Package Postcard 00•00.01•60400601•544071 : 10.,./avv.v.0.404avrwm, v'vv,v,44.,,v,Cvwv1101.,•4 WEC Trade Show E -Blast vvvvvv0111,11'101VVVVVVV„,v0:010,0,1,, 0v. ....... 010,V, 111,1:- 11Vv 1111v 111:vvv,VVIVVVV11111,111111111vv111.11 '11111111111 11,11111v1,1v. ,111111111v 11,1,00,yvv, 110„,10,11,,, Spongecell Online Banner Ads espongeeelt At w 0 0 E ) '010400,1„ 0100001111010000000,00 Room offers from $99 01" v10:v espongeceli ADS IenvotuVF• mv4i vs00.064l1 ,..,,,vVvvvvvvvv#,04v,00,04 vvvvv«: LA, V, V0 04404 v vvvyt vvvt tOvvVvvvoilivv III nn+''°' Y111OIIYIIYIIIIGIIYPVYI%^%II'r YIIIIIII"I-111i1111°°011ilumlllllllllluuurYilitfa. ��Ml'I'+VIII ll j „,„„„„11„„,„„„„,1„, ...���. rr l'11,11,111,111.1,111111,dI ry d'uuA e short drive take you a world away. rL, IR" 1111 c.000 mob„ of Temecula, yam fdendel Temecula ValVsy, Southam Carson. Wine Country. SCCera hidden treasure. Jed b PIP arc, Aa'IioY says. "Drink it all inl" A great getaway AND Incredible prizes? Sign me upl Temecula Valley, Southern California Wine Counlry. SoCal'a hidden Treasure. • PREseedle work 1. 1111 "I VI "I rd'acOaY^,011" Arilr'ytUUq r. NO* 0.0arirrtorry«,.,wl'pooera,Wweae, Irrorry Expedia, TripAdvisor, Multi Travel & Weather Sites MPI Northern California Chapter Directory l rr„ uuuu iil11, Online Booking Incentive Coupon Book il11,11 PP, r ;i,, ,,P1 Po,p tdrv:rouatrin a,d' U Ji"Ik Sunset Magazine SoCal Insider Temecula Valley SWrnExx C&a wan„ vrrowrorrco„,..ar. oau..ra,..naf. 4 Ow .gaml....e.wr -.111,Ea ah Jmuml6Ym.nr maapup,,.nwn. hard d ogano marecrlkmad emeemm dfowled runpl peml, pop CTTC-CMG I 11111111,111111111111 111111111:1'11,11111111111„e,,,,l'I' Rm.. • $500 m...tog ol.f,Ipk• • Wino C177 Cootowoy" ...kon you • moo tnoj Tocrocula Vo Wns Coruy KA16 rral Ju, pouruld to worm du Foconobonai /owl. d/f1.111 MAW LASION MR/A 0, L.111.4k1A61,K,i6C,11.01, ))111 flamer, chooso \/alloy Southern Colifomus Walls CouTar,/ Itx , array of unique Ver.:* yoar-rot,nd artN•lins and abundance of °r" 000nrobo, ctruoroglhe toinioyoords..,„oot. Smart Meetings -Site Solutions Print & Online ))),. ooOdoO, =7171.A.t/CC; Comer.e.n..• •-• Le.c,rum,Irwa. 11.r.rrrnr• 11\ X.M1.1410.111x1114111,11,,,111.10•C*01,14.1.**14,110,µ.011111,01/1rnlY011,1rnl.. I&MI Do -It -Yourself Online Workbook '1)441"n 1( California State Visitors Guide-IETC Co -Op twit E,NIN‘i ra• , • •••••••Or rt o'r"""od'oollt.oltiO174-44.:otor," od•-• d • do 011000000O 000 1,04e.rtall [ Meetings West—meetingsfocus.com „ • • • •• •••••••••••• ••••-••••• d „•••••,•d„ „„„ • • ...„.„,„„dd, • „. OOLI ) (2,7,Z0.4)0741,4,,,,r,11 c 0 0-3 0 E (T3 0 E E Meetings West—meetingsfocus.com Skyscraper fl E Room offers from $9 1 cr...4048),9 Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Roripaugh Ranch - Approval of Sixth Operating Memorandum PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SIXTH OPERATING MEMORANDUM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ASHBY USA LLC AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR SUNWOOD RORIPAUGH RANCH LLC, BHT-RORIPAUGH WB99 LLC, AND WINGSWEEP CORPORATION, OWNERS OF LOT 7 OF FINAL TRACT MAP 29353-1, TRACT 29661-2, AND LOT 1 OF FINAL TRACT MAP 29353-1, RESPECTIVELY, WITHIN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT BACKGROUND: The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002 and was amended on January 11, 2005 and February 14, 2006 (the "Specific Plan"). On December 17, 2002, the City and Ashby USA entered into that certain agreement entitled "Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC" (the "Development Agreement"). The Specific Plan and Development Agreement required Ashby USA to construct certain improvements necessary to support the homes to be built within the Project. The Specific Plan and Development Agreement further provide that the issuance of building permits is dependent on the completion of specific Public Improvements as set forth in the Specific Plan and Development Agreement. Upon the completion of the reconstruction of the main entry road (Roripaugh Meadows Road) to the Phase 1 Panhandle Area ("Panhandle"), sufficient Public Improvements have been constructed to permit the issuance of 107 building permit for the Panhandle. Pursuant to certain requirements of the Fourth Operating Memorandum approved on March 8, 2007, the City agreed to issue all 515 residential building permits for the Panhandle; however, the letter of credit required for the issuance of the permits was never posted by Ashby USA and no building permits were issued. In July 2009, the Temecula Public Financing Authority and Developer entered into that certain Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement in which the Developer agreed that the City would construct the Phase 1 Public Improvements to be funded by Community Facility District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch). The construction of the City Improvements by the City is anticipated to be completed before the end of 2011. On November 9, 2010, the City Council entered into the Fifth Operating Memorandum with HRA Roripaugh 1 and 2 LLC's, owners of Tracts 29661-3 and -4 to allow the issuance of 199 building permits (of the 515 permits) for Planning Areas 3 and 4 within the Panhandle prior to the completion of all of the Phase 1 Public Improvements, subject to the fulfillment of certain required improvements. In approving this Fifth Operating Memorandum, the City's intent was to also provide for the release of building permits to other owners of Planning Areas within Phase 1 (panhandle) on similar terms to those provided to HRA. As such, Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep, (additional owners of Phase 1 property — "Owners"), have requested the City enter into a Sixth Operating Memorandum. Sunwood has requested the City issue 113 building permits for the Sunwood property (Planning Area 4B), BHT has requested the City issue 99 building permits for the BHT property (Planning Area 2), and Wingsweep has requested the City issue 98 building permits for the Wingsweep property (Planning Area 1A). Staff supports issuing these building permits within the Panhandle upon the fulfillment of certain required improvements (as described below). Consistent with the Fifth Operating Memorandum, the major provisions of the proposed Sixth Operating Memorandum include: • Prior to the 51s1 building permit, owners shall begin construction and installation of the traffic signal at the intersection of Pourroy Road and Murrieta Hot Springs. This work shall be complete prior to the 108th building permit. Owners may be reimbursed for this work with CFD funds. • Prior to the 108th building permit, owners will complete the Nature Trail and Slope landscaping immediately adjacent to their respective property, along the rear of the Panhandle. In addition, a one-year landscape maintenance bond would be submitted to the City. • Prior to the 108th building permit, owners will complete the park located at the Roripaugh Ranch Primary Recreation Center. • Prior to the 150th building permit, owners will complete the pool and Recreation Center Building located at the Roripaugh Ranch Primary Recreation Center. The Recreation Center would then be open for use by the residents. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Owners to pay for improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 6th Operating Memorandum RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SIXTH OPERATING MEMORANDUM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ASHBY USA LLC AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR SUNWOOD RORIPAUGH RANCH LLC, BHT-RORIPAUGH WB99 LLC, AND WINGSWEEP CORPORATION, OWNERS OF LOT 7 OF FINAL TRACT MAP 29353-1, TRACT 29661-2, AND LOT 1 OF FINAL TRACT MAP 29353-1, RESPECTIVELY, WITHIN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain agreement entitled "Sixth Operating Memorandum to the Recorded Development Agreement Between City of Temecula and Ashby USA LLC" with such changes in said document as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties, the City manager and City Attorney as are in substantial conformance with the form of such agreement as presented to the City Council. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute said Sixth Operating Memorandum on behalf of the City. Section 2. The City Manager (or his designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to take all actions necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement the Sixth Operating Memorandum and to administer the City's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under the Agreement. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2011. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Clerk Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 (Space above for recorder's use) SIXTH OPERATING MEMORANDUM TO THE RECORDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ASHBY USA, LLC RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT (Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1, Final Tract Map 29661-2, and Lot 7 of Final Tract Map 29353-1) THIS SIXTH OPERATING MEMORANDUM to the Recorded Development Agreement Between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC ("Memorandum") is made and entered into as of January , 2011, by and between City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City"), Sunwood Roripaugh Ranch LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Sunwood"), BHT - Roripaugh WB99, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("BHT"), and Wingsweep Corporation, a California corporation ("Wingsweep"). Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep are sometimes referred to hereinafter collectively as "Tract Owners". In consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Tract Owners agree as follows: 1. RECITALS. This Memorandum is made with respect to the following facts and for the following purposes, each of which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties: A. Sunwood is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California generally known as Lot 7 of Final Tract Map 29353-1 (the "Sunwood Property") which property is more specifically described on Exhibit A- 1, Legal Description of the Sunwood Property. Sunwood is responsible for the development of the Sunwood Property. The Sunwood Property may be subdivided into 113 residential building lots subject to the satisfaction of the conditions for recording a final map thereon as set forth in the Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No. 01 -0253 -Tentative Tract Map No. 29661, (Level "B" Map) (Revised Per PA06-0053, Major Modification) approved November 26, 105779-00010 988149.19 1 2002 (revised May 17, 2006), referred to herein as the "Conditions of Approval". BHT is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California generally known as Final Tract Map 29661-2 (the "BHT Property") which property is more specifically described on Exhibit A-2, Legal Description of the BHT Property. BHT is responsible for the development of the BHT Property. The BHT Property has been subdivided into 99 residential building lots pursuant to Final Tract Map 29661-2. Wingsweep is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California generally known as Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1 (the "Wingsweep Property") which property is more specifically described on Exhibit A-3, Legal Description of the Wingsweep Property. Wingsweep is responsible for the development of the Wingsweep Property. The Wingsweep Property may be subdivided into 98 residential building lots subject to the satisfaction of the conditions for recording a final map thereon as set forth in the Conditions of Approval. The Sunwood Property, the BHT Property and the Wingsweep Property are depicted on Exhibit A-4. B. On December 17, 2002, the City and Ashby USA, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Developer") entered into that certain agreement entitled "Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC" which Development Agreement was recorded on January 9, 2003 in the Official Records of Riverside County ("Official Records") as Document No. 2003-108567, which was amended on February 28, 2006 by the "First Amendment to Development Agreement Between City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC" recorded on March 7, 2006 in the Official Records of Riverside County as Document No. 2006-0162268 (collectively, the "Development Agreement"). The Sunwood Property, the BHT Property and the Wingsweep Property are a portion of the real property subject to and encumbered by the Development Agreement. C. Section 3.5.5 of the Development Agreement authorizes Developer or an Owner (such as Sunwood and/or BHT and/or Wingsweep) and the City to approve an "Operating Memorandum which does not constitute an amendment" to the Development Agreement, in order to implement the Development Agreement or provide for "changes, adjustments, or clarifications [that] are appropriate to further the intended purposes" of the Development Agreement. The First Operating Memorandum was entered into on October 21, 2004 and was recorded November 3, 2004 as Document No. 2004-0874441 of Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder, the Second Operating Memorandum was entered into on March 21, 2006 and was recorded on March 30, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0225016 of Official Records, the Third Operating Memorandum was entered into on August 31, 2006 and was recorded October 19, 2006 as Document No. 2006-0770494 of Official Records, the Fourth Operating Memorandum was entered into on March 6, 2007 and was recorded on March 8, 2007 as Document No, 2007-0160512 in the Official Records, and the Fifth Operating Memorandum was entered into on October 26, 2010 and was recorded on November 18, 2010 as Document No. 2010-0557219 in the Official Records (collectively, the "Operating Memoranda"). D. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was approved by the City on November 26, 2002 and was amended on January 11, 2005 and February 14, 2006 (the "Specific Plan"). The Specific Plan is part of the Development Plan as defined in Section 1 of the 105779-00010 988149.19 2 Development Agreement. "Project" shall mean that development project described in the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan. E. The Specific Plan and Development Agreement require the construction of certain Public Improvements necessary to support the homes to be built within the Project. The Specific Plan and Development Agreement further provide that the issuance of building permits is dependent on the completion of specific Public Improvements as set forth in the Specific Plan and Development Agreement. F. Upon the completion of the reconstruction of the main entry road as described in the Specific Plan, sufficient Public Improvements will have been constructed to permit the issuance of 107 building permits for the Phase I of the Specific Plan (Panhandle Area) ("Phase 1"), of which the Sunwood Property, the BHT Property, and the Wingsweep Property are each a part. G. Pursuant to the Fourth Operating Memorandum, the City agreed to issue all 515 residential building permits for Phase I of the Project with the fulfillment of the following conditions, without application of force majeure: 1) Developer posts the Letter of Credit in the amount of $8,030,000 for the "Phase I Public Improvements" as described in Section 3 of the Fourth Operating Memorandum concurrently with the issuance of the fourth (4th) residential building permit for Phase I of the Project; 2) The Riverside County Flood Control District and the applicable Resource Agencies have issued such permits and approvals as necessary to construct the six foot (6') diameter storm drain necessary for completion of: (1) permanent access on Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road for the fire station, except for sidewalks and landscaping; and (2) the Secondary Access required by Attachment 5 to the Development Agreement and as described in Section "n" of the conditions precedent to the 108th building permit in Appendix K to the Official Statement, except for landscaping and sidewalks; and 3) All other conditions and requirements for the issuance of the requested building permits, including but not limited to Building Codes plan checks, have been fulfilled except for completion of the Phase I Public Improvements. The letter of credit described in Section 3 of the Fourth Operating Memorandum was never posted with the City and no building permits were issued pursuant to the Fourth Operating Memorandum. H. The Phase I Public Improvements for the Project are described on Attachment 5 of the Development Agreement. The current status of the Phase I Public Improvements are as follows: yet completed. 105779-00010 988149.19 1) Fire Station. Construction has started on the Fire Station but is not 3 2) Portion of Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Construct full -width improvements from east of Pourroy Road at the northern project boundary to the MWD pipeline property. Construction has started but is not yet complete. 3) Portion of Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Construct full -width improvements from MWD pipeline property to Butterfield Stage Road. Construction has started but is not yet complete. 4) Culverts for Santa Gertrudis Creek. Construct full width arch culverts for Santa Gertrudis Creek at Butterfield Stage Road and North Loop Road. Construction is complete. 5) Culverts for Long Valley Wash. Construct full width arch culverts for Long Valley Wash at Butterfield Stage Road. Construction is complete. 6) 5.1 Acre Neighborhood Park. The neighborhood park in Planning Area 6 has been partially completed but has not yet been deemed complete or accepted by the City. It is controlled by an entity owned by Developer. 7) Roripaugh Valley Road. Street "A" (Roripaugh Valley Road) has been partially completed but has not yet been accepted by the City. 8) Fiesta Ranch Road. Street "B" (Fiesta Ranch Road) has been partially completed but has not yet been accepted by the City. 9) Nature Walk/Landscape Areas. The nature walk and adjacent landscape areas (Lot 36) and the trail in Planning Area 7A have been partially completed but have not yet been deemed complete by the City. 10) Park at Private Recreation Center. The park portion of the private recreation center in Planning Area 5 has been partially completed but has not yet been deemed complete by the City. 11) Building/Pool Private Recreation Center. The building and pool portion of the private recreation center in Planning Area 5 have been partially completed but have not yet been deemed complete by the City. I. On or about July 21, 2009, Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") and Developer entered into that certain Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement"). Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, the Developer agreed that the City would construct the Phase I Public Improvements defined in the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, and described below for convenience, (referred to herein, as "City Improvements") and the Authority agreed to fund the City's construction of the City Improvements through the Authority's Communities Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD"). Funding is currently available through the CFD for these City Improvements. Except for the City Improvements 105779-00010 988149.19 4 described in Sections 2)d. and 2)e. below, construction of the City Improvements by the City is anticipated to be completed before the end of 2011. The City Improvements are as follows: 1) Murrieta Hot Springs Road. a. Murrieta Hot Spring Road from west boundary of Tract 29661 to north boundary of Tract 29661. b. Murrieta Hot Springs Road from north boundary of Tract 29661 to Westside of MWD right-of-way 2,300 feet. c. Murrieta Hot Springs Road from Westside of MWD right- of-way to Butterfield Stage Road 1,500 feet. 2) Butterfield Stage Road. a. Butterfield Stage Road from north right-of-way of Murrieta Hot Springs Road to north right-of-way of Nicolas Road 2,300 feet. b. Butterfield Stage Road from Nicolas Road to 550 feet south of Nicolas Road 550 feet. c. Butterfield Stage Road from 550 feet south of Nicolas Road to southerly boundary line 1,910 feet. d. Butterfield Stage Road from southerly boundary of Tract 29353 to 1,230 feet north of La Serena Way 2,110 feet (50 percent within County). e. Butterfield Stage Road from 1,230 feet north of La Serena Way to La Serena Way 1,930 feet. 3) Calle Chapos from Butterfield Stage Road to Walcott Lane 500 feet. 4) South Loop Road. Full width improvements along frontage of Fire Station to intersection of Butterfield Stage Road. J. The City's construction of the above-described improvements to Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road (even without the construction of the improvements described in Section 1.I.2d and 2e. set forth above) as part of the City Improvements (the "Butterfield Stage Improvements") effectively provides secondary access to Phase I of the Project for all public safety and fire protection purposes in satisfaction of the conditions of approval for the Project. K. In the Fifth Operating Memorandum, the City agreed to issue 199 building permits to HRA Roripaugh 1, LLC and HRA Roripaugh 2, LLC, (which own property within 105779-00010 988149.19 5 Phase 1 of the Project and which property is subject to the Development Agreement) prior to the completion of all of the Phase 1 Public Improvements subject to the terms set forth in such Fifth Operating Memorandum. The Fifth Operating Memorandum also provided that it is the intent of the City to provide for the release of building permits to other owners of Planning Areas within Phase 1 of the Project (which would include Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep) on similar terms to those set forth in the Fifth Operating Memorandum. L. Sunwood has requested the City to agree to issue 113 building permits for the Sunwood Property, BHT has requested the City to agree to issue 99 building permits for the BHT Property, and Wingsweep has requested the City to agree to issue 98 building permits for the Wingsweep Property of the 515 building permits for Phase 1 of the Project prior to the completion of all of the Phase 1 Public Improvements, and City is willing to do so based on the terms and conditions of this Memorandum. M. The changes, adjustments and clarifications of the Development Agreement set forth in this Memorandum are appropriate to further the intended purposes of the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan. N. There are other owners of Planning Areas within Phase I of the Project. It is the intent of the City to provide for the release of building permits to those owners on terms similar to those set forth in this Sixth Operating Memorandum. O. As used in this Memorandum, the following terms shall be defined as follows: 1) "Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement" is defined in Section 1.I. of this Memorandum. 2) "Authority" is defined in Section 1I of this Memorandum. 3) "BHT Property" is defined in Section 1.A. of this Memorandum. 4) "BHT Property Required Improvements" is defined in Section 3 of this Memorandum and are the public improvements BHT is required to complete prior to the City's issuance to BHT of 99 residential building permits. 5) "Butterfield Stage Improvements" is defined in Section 1.J. of this Memorandum. 6) "CFD" is defined in Section 1 .I. of this Memorandum. 7) "City Improvements" is defined in Section 1.I. of this Memorandum. 8) "Developer" is defined in Section 1.B. of this Memorandum. The current status of Ashby USA and its successors is unknown and, therefore, the City makes no 105779-00010 988149.19 6 representations as to the Developer or its ability to complete its obligations under the Development Agreement. Memorandum. 9) "Development Agreement" is defined in Section 1.B of this 10) "Force Majeure" is defined in Section 6.D. of this Memorandum. 11) "Phase I Public Improvements" are the public improvements described in the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan as required for the homes in Phase I of the Roripaugh Ranch Project and are described in Attachment 5 of the Development Agreement. 12) "Project" shall mean that development project described in the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan. 13) "Recreation Center Property" is defined in Section 2.A. of this Memorandum. 14) "Specific Plan" shall mean the "Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP11)" approved by the City Council on November 26, 2002, as amended. 15) "Sunwood Property" is defined in Section 1.A. of this Memorandum. 16) "Sunwood Property Required Improvements" is defined in Section 2 of this Memorandum and are the public improvements Sunwood is required to complete prior to the City's issuance to Sunwood of 113 residential building permits. 17) "TUMF Credit Agreement" is defined in Section 6.B. of this Memorandum. 18) "TUMF Improvements" are those certain Public Improvements to be constructed pursuant to the TUMF Credit Agreement. 19) "Wingsweep Property" is defined in Section 1.A. of this Memorandum. 20) "Wingsweep Property Required Improvements" is defined in Section 4 of this Memorandum and are the public improvements Wingsweep is required to complete prior to the City's issuance to Wingsweep of 98 residential building permits 2. ISSUANCE OF 113 BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE SUNWOOD PROPERTY. The City shall issue 113 building permits to Sunwood (for Lot 7 of Final Tract Map 29353-1) of the 515 residential building permits for Phase 1 of the Project upon the 105779-00010 988149.19 7 fulfillment of the following conditions (collectively, the "Sunwood Property Required Improvements"), without application of force maj eure: A. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Sunwood shall complete or cause to be completed the Recreation Center Park Work (defined below) in connection with the private recreation center in Planning Area 5 (the "Recreation Center Property"). The "Recreation Center Park Work" shall consist of the work remaining to be completed on the park portion of the Recreation Center Property (to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning). B. Prior to the issuance of the 150th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Sunwood shall complete or cause to be completed the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work (defined below). The "Recreation Center Building and Pool Work" shall consist of the work remaining to be completed on the building and pool portion of the Recreation Center Property (to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning), but shall not include a transfer to the homeowner's association, which is not anticipated to occur until the homeowner's association's ownership and maintenance of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work is economically viable. Following completion of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work, Sunwood shall cause to be maintained the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work until the Recreation Center Property is transferred to the homeowner's association. On or before the completion of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work, Sunwood will enter into an agreement with the owner of the Recreation Center Property to contribute towards the acquisition, construction and maintenance of the Recreation Center Property and the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work ("Recreation Center Agreement"). Given that other Owners of Phase I (or the Panhandle) shall benefit from the Recreation Center Property, and the Recreation Center Building Pool Work, it is anticipated that other Owners in Phase I (or the Panhandle) also shall enter into Recreation Center Agreements with the owner of the Recreation Center Property. If requested by Sunwood, the City shall assist Sunwood and/or the owner of the Recreation Center Property in requiring the other Owners of Phase I (or the Panhandle) to enter into Recreation Center Agreements and, if necessary, the City shall require such Recreation Center Agreements to be in place prior to the release of building permits to such other Owners. C. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Sunwood shall complete or cause to be completed the Nature Trail and Slope Work (defined below) on Planning Area 7A. The "Nature Trail and Slope Work" shall consist of: (i) the work remaining to be completed for only those portions of the nature trail and adjacent landscape areas, as well as the slope, located on Planning Area 7A and which are immediately adjacent to, and along the frontage of Lot 7 of Tract 29353-1, including, without limitation, all permanent utilities, and the deeming of the work complete by the City (with a corresponding transfer of Planning Area 7A to the homeowner's association); and (ii) the submittal to the Director of Planning of a one-year maintenance bond pertaining only to those portions of the nature trail and adjacent landscape areas, as well as the slope, located on Planning Area 7A and which are immediately adjacent to, and along the frontage of Lot 7 of Tract 29353- 1. 105779-00010 988149.19 8 D. Prior to the issuance of the 51st residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Sunwood shall have commenced or caused the commencement of construction and installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pourroy Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Sunwood shall have completed or caused the completion of construction and installation of such traffic signal. The City already has caused to be designed the plans and specifications for the traffic signal, as well as the related right-hand and left-hand turn pockets required in connection therewith, and, at Sunwood's request, shall assign and/or make available to Sunwood such plans and specifications to enable Sunwood to pull improvement permits related to the traffic signal without further processing or delay. If Sunwood is the party that proceeds with the installation of the traffic signal work, (i) Sunwood shall bid the traffic signal work in accordance with the bidding and construction requirements of the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement applicable to public improvements paid for with CFD Bond funds, (ii) the Director of Public Works shall approve the bids for the work, (iii) Sunwood acknowledges that pursuant to the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, it shall pay prevailing wages in accordance with Labor Code Section 1720, et seq. for the work, and (iv) as soon as reasonably practicable, but not later than forty-five (45) days, following the City's acceptance of the traffic signal, the City shall reimburse Sunwood for its actual costs of the construction and installation of the traffic signal in accordance with Article V of the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement. E. Prior to the issuance of any residential building permits within Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, the detention basin located in lot 8 of Tract 29353-1 Planning Area 7B and associated drainage facilities (the "Basin A System") shall be constructed and installed. In the event Sunwood constructs and installs the Basin A System, the City shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with Sunwood to allow them to recover from benefiting property owners in the vicinity their pro rata costs of constructing the Basin A System and related improvements. Sunwood will use its reasonable best efforts to join with the owners of Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1, Tract 29661-2 and Tract 29661-3 to assist in achieving the completion of the construction of the Basin A System. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, upon approval by the City's Planning Commission of a revised condition of approval pertaining to the construction and installation of temporary or permanent drainage facilities so as to connect the drainage facilities on the Sunwood Property to permanent drainage facilities (the "Revised Drainage Condition"), the following provisions shall apply: The City will allow building permits for lots within the Sunwood Property (whose storm drain runoff drains towards the detention basin and associated drainage facilities located to the south of the Recreation Building (the "Basin B System")), upon the completion of the Basin B System. To the extent Sunwood does not have sufficient title or interest in the real property required for the construction or installation of the Basin B System, Sunwood shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required property in a 105779-00010 988149.19 9 timeframe calculated to meet the obligations of this paragraph. If, following this effort, Sunwood is unable to acquire the required property, Sunwood may request that the City acquire the property pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 66462.5. The City shall consider in good faith the acquisition of the required property pursuant to an agreement in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66462.5. Both parties acknowledge and agree that the acquisition of real property in accordance with the California Eminent Domain Law requires more time than the suggested timeframes of Government Code Section 66462.5 allow and therefore, the parties waive these time constraints and the Agreement shall so provide. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the City cannot exercise its power of eminent domain unless and until a Resolution of Necessity has been duly adopted by the City Council pursuant to law. The provisions of this paragraph are neither a commitment nor an announcement of intent by the City to acquire any or all of the property required for construction or installation of the Basin B System. The parties shall enter into an agreement provided for the exercise of this section and the payment by Sunwood of necessary City expenses. F. The final map that subdivides the Sunwood Property into 113 building lots shall have been recorded. The City will not impose any additional requirements to the recording of such final map or the issuance of building permits or occupancy permits for the Sunwood Property except (i) as set forth in the Conditions of Approval described in Recital A above as such conditions have been modified, refined or clarified by the Development Agreement, the Operating Memoranda, or as noted in the Recitals set forth above, and (ii) as set forth or clarified in this Memorandum. G. All other conditions and requirements for the issuance of the requested building permits, including but not limited to Building Codes plan checks, have been fulfilled except for completion of the Phase I Public Improvements (which are being addressed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Memorandum). 3. ISSUANCE OF 99 BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE BHT PROPERTY. The City shall issue 99 building permits to BHT (for Final Tract Map 29661-2) of the 515 residential building permits for Phase 1 of the Project upon the fulfillment of the following conditions (collectively, the "BHT Property Required Improvements"), without application of force majeure: A. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, BHT shall complete or cause to be completed the Recreation Center Park Work (defined below) in connection with the private recreation center in Planning Area 5 (the "Recreation Center Property"). The "Recreation Center Park Work" shall consist of the work remaining to be completed on the park portion of the Recreation Center Property (to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning). B. Prior to the issuance of the 150th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, BHT shall complete or cause to be completed the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work (defined below). The "Recreation Center Building and Pool Work" shall consist of the work remaining to be completed on the building and pool portion of 105779-00010 988149.19 10 the Recreation Center Property (to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning), but shall not include a transfer to the homeowner's association, which is not anticipated to occur until the homeowner's association's ownership and maintenance of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work is economically viable. Following completion of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work, BHT shall cause to be maintained the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work until the Recreation Center Property is transferred to the homeowner's association. On or before the completion of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work, BHT will enter into an agreement with the owner of the Recreation Center Property to contribute towards the acquisition, construction and maintenance of the Recreation Center Property and the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work ("Recreation Center Agreement"). Given that other Owners of Phase I (or the Panhandle) shall benefit from the Recreation Center Property, and the Recreation Center Building Pool Work, it is anticipated that other Owners in Phase I (or the Panhandle) also shall enter into Recreation Center Agreements with the owner of the Recreation Center Property. If requested by BHT, the City shall assist BHT and/or the owner of the Recreation Center Property in requiring the other Owners of Phase I (or the Panhandle) to enter into Recreation Center Agreements and, if necessary, the City shall require such Recreation Center Agreements to be in place prior to the release of building permits to such other Owners. C. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, BHT shall complete or cause to be completed the Nature Trail and Slope Work (defined below) on Planning Area 7A. The "Nature Trail and Slope Work" shall consist of: (i) the work remaining to be completed for only those portions of the nature trail and adjacent landscape areas, as well as the slope, located on Planning Area 7A and which are immediately adjacent to, and along the frontage of Tract 29661-2, including, without limitation, all permanent utilities, and the deeming of the work complete by the City (with a corresponding transfer of Planning Area 7A to the homeowner's association); and (ii) the submittal to the Director of Planning of a one-year maintenance bond pertaining only to those portions of the nature trail and adjacent landscape areas, as well as the slope, located on Planning Area 7A and which are immediately adjacent to, and along the frontage of Tract 29661-2. D. Prior to the issuance of the 51st residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, BHT shall have commenced or caused the commencement of construction and installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pourroy Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, BHT shall have completed or caused the completion of construction and installation of such traffic signal. The City already has caused to be designed the plans and specifications for the traffic signal, as well as the related right-hand and left-hand turn pockets required in connection therewith, and at BHT's request, shall assign and/or make available to BHT such plans and specifications to enable BHT to pull improvement permits related to the traffic signal without further processing or delay. If BHT is the party that proceeds with the installation of the traffic signal work, (i) BHT shall bid the traffic signal work in accordance with the bidding and construction requirements of the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement applicable to public improvements paid for with CFD Bond funds, (ii) the Director of Public Works shall approve the bids for the work, (iii) BHT acknowledges that pursuant to the 105779-00010 988149.19 11 Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, it shall pay prevailing wages in accordance with Labor Code Section 1720, et seq. for the work, and (iv) as soon as reasonably practicable, but not later than forty-five (45) days, following the City's acceptance of the traffic signal, the City shall reimburse BHT for its actual costs of the construction and installation of the traffic signal in accordance with Article V of the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement. E. Prior to the issuance of any residential building permits within Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, the Basin A System shall be constructed and installed. In the event BHT constructs and installs the Basin A System, the City shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with BHT to allow them to recover from benefiting property owners in the vicinity their pro rata costs of constructing the Basin A System and related improvements. BHT will use its reasonable best efforts to join with the owners of Lot 1 of Tract Map 29353-1 and of Tract 29661-3 and complete the construction and share in the costs of the Basin A System. The City will assist BHT with completing the cost sharing agreement for the Basin A System. To the extent BHT does not have sufficient title or interest in the real property required for the construction or installation of the Basin A System, BHT shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required property in a timeframe calculated to meet the obligations of this paragraph. If, following this effort, BHT is unable to acquire the required property, BHT may request that the City acquire the property pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 66462.5. The City shall consider in good faith the acquisition of the required property pursuant to an agreement in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66462.5. Both parties acknowledge and agree that the acquisition of real property in accordance with the California Eminent Domain Law requires more time than the suggested timeframes of Government Code Section 66462.5 allow and therefore, the parties waive these time constraints and the Agreement shall so provide. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the City cannot exercise its power of eminent domain unless and until a Resolution of Necessity has been duly adopted by the City Council pursuant to law. The provisions of this paragraph are neither a commitment nor an announcement of intent by the City to acquire any or all of the property required for construction or installation of the Basin A System. The parties shall enter into an agreement provided for the exercise of this section and the payment by BHT of necessary City expenses. F. All other conditions and requirements for the issuance of the requested building permits, including but not limited to Building Codes plan checks, have been fulfilled except for completion of the Phase I Public Improvements (which are being addressed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Memorandum). 4. ISSUANCE OF 98 BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE WINGSWEEP PROPERTY. The City shall issue 98 building permits to Wingsweep (for Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1) of the 515 residential building permits for Phase 1 of the Project upon the fulfillment of the following conditions (collectively, the "Wingsweep Property Required Improvements"), without application of force majeure: 105779-00010 988149.19 12 A. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Wingsweep shall complete or cause to be completed the Recreation Center Park Work (defined below) in connection with the private recreation center in Planning Area 5 (the "Recreation Center Property"). The "Recreation Center Park Work" shall consist of the work remaining to be completed on the park portion of the Recreation Center Property (to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning). B. Prior to the issuance of the 150th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Wingsweep shall complete or cause to be completed the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work (defined below). The "Recreation Center Building and Pool Work" shall consist of the work remaining to be completed on the building and pool portion of the Recreation Center Property (to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning), but shall not include a transfer to the homeowner's association, which is not anticipated to occur until the homeowner's association's ownership and maintenance of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work is economically viable. Following completion of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work, Wingsweep shall cause to be maintained the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work until the Recreation Center Property is transferred to the homeowner's association. On or before the completion of the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work, Wingsweep will enter into an agreement with the owner of the Recreation Center Property to contribute towards the acquisition, construction and maintenance of the Recreation Center Property and the Recreation Center Building and Pool Work ("Recreation Center Agreement"). Given that other Owners of Phase I (or the Panhandle) shall benefit from the Recreation Center Property, and the Recreation Center Building Pool Work, it is anticipated that other Owners in Phase I (or the Panhandle) also shall enter into Recreation Center Agreements with the owner of the Recreation Center Property. If requested by Wingsweep, the City shall assist Wingsweep and/or the owner of the Recreation Center Property in requiring the other Owners of Phase I (or the Panhandle) to enter into Recreation Center Agreements and, if necessary, the City shall require such Recreation Center Agreements to be in place prior to the release of building permits to such other Owners. C. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Wingsweep shall complete or cause to be completed the Nature Trail and Slope Work (defined below) on Planning Area 7A. The "Nature Trail and Slope Work" shall consist of: (i) the work remaining to be completed for only those portions of the nature trail and adjacent landscape areas, as well as the slope, located on Planning Area 7A and which are immediately adjacent to, and along the frontage of Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1, including, without limitation, all permanent utilities, and the deeming of the work complete by the City (with a corresponding transfer of Planning Area 7A to the homeowner's association); and (ii) the submittal to the Director of Planning of a one-year maintenance bond pertaining only to those portions of the nature trail and adjacent landscape areas, as well as the slope, located on Planning Area 7A and which are immediately adjacent to, and along the frontage of Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1. 105779-00010 988149.19 13 D. Prior to the issuance of the 51st residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Wingsweep shall have commenced or caused the commencement of construction and installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pourroy Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Prior to the issuance of the 108th residential building permit in Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, Wingsweep shall have completed or caused the completion of construction and installation of such traffic signal. The City already has caused to be designed the plans and specifications for the traffic signal, as well as the related right-hand and left-hand turn pockets required in connection therewith, and at Wingsweep's request, shall assign and/or make available to Wingsweep such plans and specifications to enable Wingsweep to pull improvement permits related to the traffic signal without further processing or delay. If Wingsweep is the party that proceeds with the installation of the traffic signal work, (i) Wingsweep shall bid the traffic signal work in accordance with the bidding and construction requirements of the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement applicable to public improvements paid for with CFD Bond funds, (ii) the Director of Public Works shall approve the bids for the work, (iii) Wingsweep acknowledges that pursuant to the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement, it shall pay prevailing wages in accordance with Labor Code Section 1720, et seq. for the work, and (iv) as soon as reasonably practicable, but not later than forty-five (45) days, following the City's acceptance of the traffic signal, the City shall reimburse Wingsweep for its actual costs of the construction and installation of the traffic signal in accordance with Article V of the Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement. E. Prior to the issuance of any residential building permits within Phase 1 of the Roripaugh Ranch Project, the Basin A System shall be constructed and installed. In the event Wingsweep constructs and installs the Basin A System, the City shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with Wingsweep to allow them to recover from benefiting property owners in the vicinity their pro rata costs of constructing the Basin A System and related improvements. Wingsweep will use its reasonable best efforts to join with the owners of Tracts 29661-2 and 29661-3 and complete the construction and share in the costs of the Basin A System. The City will assist Wingsweep with completing the cost sharing agreement for the Basin A System. To the extent Wingsweep does not have sufficient title or interest in the real property required for the construction or installation of the Basin A System, Wingsweep shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required property in a timeframe calculated to meet the obligations of this paragraph. If, following this effort, Wingsweep is unable to acquire the required property, Wingsweep may request that the City acquire the property pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 66462.5. The City shall consider in good faith the acquisition of the required property pursuant to an agreement in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66462.5. Both parties acknowledge and agree that the acquisition of real property in accordance with the California Eminent Domain Law requires more time than the suggested timeframes of Government Code Section 66462.5 allow and therefore, the parties waive these time constraints and the Agreement shall so provide. The parties further acknowledge and agree that the City cannot exercise its power of eminent domain unless and until a Resolution of Necessity has been duly adopted by the City Council pursuant to law. The provisions of this paragraph are neither a commitment nor an announcement of intent by the City to acquire any or all of the property required for construction or installation of the Basin A 105779-00010 988149.19 14 System. The parties shall enter into an agreement provided for the exercise of this section and the payment by Wingsweep of necessary City expenses. F. The final map that subdivides the Wingsweep Property into 98 building lots shall have been recorded. The City will not impose any additional requirements to the recording of such final map or the issuance of building permits or occupancy permits for the Wingsweep Property except (i) as set forth in the Conditions of Approval described in Recital A above as such conditions have been modified, refined or clarified by the Development Agreement, the Operating Memoranda, or as noted in the Recitals set forth above, and (ii) as set forth or clarified in this Memorandum. G. All other conditions and requirements for the issuance of the requested building permits, including but not limited to Building Codes plan checks, have been fulfilled except for completion of the Phase I Public Improvements (which are being addressed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Memorandum). 5. FEE CREDITS FOR PROPERTY. A. DIF Credits. 1. General. Section 4.1.1 of the Development Agreement governs the means by which the City's Development Impact Fees ("DIF") are collected and accounted for as regards the Project and the conditions under which DIF credits are available. 2. Street Improvement DIF Component. In accordance with Section 4.1.1.1. of the Development Agreement, the City will provide a 100% DIF credit for the street improvement DIF component, and thus not require cash payment to the City from Sunwood or BHT or Wingsweep for this component. 3. Traffic Signal DIF Component. In accordance with Section 4.1.1.2. of the Development Agreement, the City will provide a 100% DIF credit for the traffic signal DIF component, and thus not require cash payment to the City from Sunwood or BHT or Wingsweep for this component. 4. Library and Corporate Facilities DIF Component. No credit for the library and corporate facilities DIF component described in Section 4.1.1.3. of the Development Agreement shall be allowed and Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep shall each pay the applicable DIF for this component with respect to their respective properties. 5. Fire Service Improvements DIF Component. In accordance with Section 4.1.1.4, the City will provide a 100% DIF credit for the fire service improvements DIF component, and thus not require cash payment to the City from Sunwood or BHT or Wingsweep for this component. 6. Park and Recreation DIF Component. No credit for the park and recreation DIF component described in Section 4.1.1.5. of the Development Agreement shall be 105779-00010 988149.19 15 allowed and Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep shall each pay the applicable DIF for this component with respect to their respective properties; provided however, that the City shall refund to such party the park and recreation DIF actually paid to the City, without interest, as soon as reasonably practical, but not later than forty-five days following the City's acceptance of the (1) 5.1 acre Neighborhood Park (Planning Area 6) as described in Section 4.1.1.5b. of the Development Agreement, and (2) street and right of way improvements as described in Section 4.1.1.5c. of the Development Agreement. B. TUMF Credits. 1. City, Developer, other Owners and the Western Riverside County Council of Governments, a joint powers agency and council of governments organized under the laws of the State of California entered into that certain "Roripaugh Ranch Project Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Improvement and Credit Agreement dated as of February 28, 2006 (the "TUMF Credit Agreement"). 2. Pursuant to the TUMF Credit Agreement it is anticipated that the construction of TUMF Improvements contemplated therein will substantially exceed the TUMF obligations of the Owners and, therefore, Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep shall not be obligated to pay TUMF fees in connection with their residential building permits for their properties referenced above. C. Quimby Fees. In accordance with Section 412, of the Development Agreement, the City will provide a 100% credit for Sunwood's, BHT's and Wingsweep's proportionate share of the fees required by Section 16.33 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance ("Quimby Fees") for the Property, and thus neither Sunwood nor BHT nor Wingsweep shall be required to pay Quimby Fees for the residential building permits for the their properties referenced above. D. Development Agreement Fee. This fee was paid by Developer at the time of the issuance of the Bonds and, therefore, neither Sunwood nor BHT nor Wingsweep shall be required to pay this fee. E. Public Art, Open Space and Habitat Preservation Fee. Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep shall each be required to pay the fees described in Section 4.1.4.b. of the Development Agreement. The fee described in Section 4.1.4.a. of the Development Agreement has been fully satisfied and is not required to be paid. F. Transit Contributions. Sunwood, BHT and Wingsweep shall each pay its fair share of the Transit Contribution in accordance with Section 4.1.5 of the Development Agreement. Sunwood's fair share of the Transit Contribution for Lot 7 of Tract 29353-1 shall be in the amount of $19,427 (or $300,000 multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the 113 lots within Lot 7 of Tract 29353-1 and the denominator is the 1,745 residential units allowed to be constructed in the Roripaugh Ranch Project), and shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit in Lot 7 of Tract 29353-1. BHT's fair share of the Transit Contribution for Tract 29661-2 shall be in the amount of $17,020 (based on the same formula 105779-00010 988149.19 16 and the 99 lots contained in Tract 29661-2), and shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit in Tract 29661-2. Wingsweep's fair share of the Transit Contribution for Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1 shall be in the amount of $16,848 (based on the same formula and the 98 lots contained in Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1), and shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit in Lot 1 of Final Tract Map 29353-1. G. MSHCP. The Development Agreement was approved prior to the adoption of the City's Multispecies Habitat Conservation requirements in Chapter 15.10 of the Temecula Municipal Code and, therefore, neither Sunwood nor BHT is required to pay the MSHCP fee otherwise required by Chapter 15.10. 6. TERM OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The Development Agreement provides that it shall continue for a ten (10) year term from the Commencement Date unless terminated pursuant to the terms of the Development Agreement. The Commencement Date is defined in the Development Agreement as the date of the issuance of the first building permit within the Project or the one year anniversary date of the Effective Date, whichever occurs first. The Effective Date is defined as the date the Authorizing Ordinance becomes effective, which is the thirty first (31st) day after the second reading of the Authorizing Ordinance. As a matter of clarification, City and the Tract Owners acknowledge and agree that a building permit for the clubhouse was issued November 25, 2003, the second reading of the Authorizing Ordinance occurred December 17, 2002, and as a result of the above, the term of the Development Agreement continues through November 25, 2013. 7. LEGAL REMEDIES; RELEASE OF CLAIMS A. The Tract Owners' sole remedy in the event of a breach of this Memorandum by City shall be specific performance, declaratory relief; writ of mandate, or similar remedies to compel City's compliance with the terms of this Memorandum. Due to the size, nature and scope of the Project, it may not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its natural condition once implementation of this Memorandum has begun. After such implementation, such Tract Owner may be foreclosed from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property and provide for other benefits. City acknowledges that each Tract Owner has already invested significant time and resources and performed extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Memorandum and will be investing even more significant time and resources in implementing the Project in reliance upon the terms of this Memorandum, and it may not be possible to determine the sum of money which would adequately compensate such Tract Owner for such efforts. For the above reason, the City and the Tract Owners agree that damages may not be an adequate remedy if the City fails to carry out its obligations under this Memorandum and that such Tract Owner's sole legal or equitable remedy shall be the right to seek and obtain specific performance, declaratory relief, writ of mandate, or similar remedies to compel City's compliance with the terms of this Memorandum as a remedy for any breach of this Memorandum or the unlawful failure to issue building permits for Phase I of the Project and that specific performance, declaratory relief, writ of mandate, or similar remedies to compel City's compliance with the terms of this Memorandum are available remedies in the event a Tract Owner establishes City's breach of this Memorandum or the 105779-00010 988149.19 17 unlawful failure to issue building permits for Phase I of the Project. Any such action shall be filed in the appropriate court within one (1) year from the date of the action by the City that is being challenged. B. No Tract Owner shall retain the right to seek, and hereby expressly waives, the right to seek damages against City, its elected and appointed officials, agents, contractors and attorneys for any action or failure to act under this Memorandum. C. City shall have all legal and equitable remedies available to it, provided City shall not file any such action until twenty (20) days following notice to the affected Tract Owner of the alleged breach or other problem, except for such filings as may be necessary to preserve any applicable statute of limitations. During such 20 -day period the parties shall meet and confer in good faith in an attempt to resolve the dispute. D. Except as provided in Section 2 of this Memorandum, no Tract Owner shall be deemed to be in default, subject to the provisions of this section, where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Memorandum is caused by floods, earthquakes, rain, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, beyond such Tract Owner's control, but for no other causes ("force majeure"). If a Tract Owner claims force majeure pursuant to this section, the Tract Owner shall notify the City within five (5) business days of the event. The cumulative days allowed for force majeure relief under this Memorandum with respect to any Tract Owner shall be a maximum of forty-five (45) days. E. In consideration of the promise of the parties specified in this Memorandum and the need for the Tract Owners to obtain the early release of the Phase 1 building permits in order to facilitate the sale of the 113 lots of Phase I in the Sunwood Property, the 99 lots in the BHT Property and the 98 lots in the Wingsweep Property to a merchant builder, each such Tract Owner shall fully and forever release, acquit, and discharge the City, Temecula Public Financing Authority, their officers, elected officials, attorneys, agent, servants, representatives, and employees ("Release Party") of and from any and all past, present, or future claims, demand, obligations, actions, causes of action for monetary damages or for relief by way of a writ of mandate for costs, losses of service, expenses, liability, attorney fees, suits, and compensation of any nature whatsoever, except for injunctive or declaratory relief or specific performance, whether based on tort, contract, or other theory of recovery, known or unknown, that they now have, have had, asserted or could have asserted because of any event, act, error or omission occurring up to and including the date of this Memorandum relating to the Specific Plan, Development Agreement, Deferral Agreement, First, Second, Third Operating, and Fourth Operating Memoranda, the land use entitlements for the Roripaugh Ranch Project, the Bonds, or otherwise relate to the alleged actions or inactions of the Indemnified Parties with respect to the Roripaugh Ranch Project or the Bonds. The foregoing release shall not affect any rights, duties, or obligations arising under this Memorandum or arising in the future under any agreement between the parties thereto, subject to the terms of those agreements or an action to compel the Authority to release the proceeds of the Bonds pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. Each Tract Owner acknowledges that it is familiar with Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which provides: 105779-00010 988149.19 18 "A general release does not extend to claims which a creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." Each Tract Owner being aware of the aforesaid code section, hereby expressly waives any rights it might have hereunder with respect to the release described in this Section. F. Any legal action hereunder shall be heard by way of a reference from the Riverside County Superior Court pursuant to the reference procedures of the California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 638, et seq. The affected Tract Owner and the City shall agree upon a single referee who shall then try all issues, whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgment thereon and issue all legal and equitable relief appropriate under the circumstances of the controversy before him. If the parties are unable to agree on a referee within ten (10) days of a written request to do so by either party hereto, either party may seek to have one appointed pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 640. The cost of such proceeding shall be initially be borne equally by the parties. Any referee selection pursuant to this Section shall be considered a temporary judge appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California Constitution. G. If legal action is brought by any party against another for breach of this Memorandum or to compel performance under this Memorandum, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of its costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, and shall also be entitled to recover its contribution for the costs of the referee referred to in this Section as an item of recoverable costs. 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Pursuant to Section 3.5.5 of the Development Agreement, this Memorandum shall be attached to the Development Agreement as an addendum and thereafter become a part of the Development Agreement. B. As part of the Development Agreement, this Memorandum shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties' successors, transferees and assignees to the same extent as the original Development Agreement. This Memorandum shall be recorded in order to ensure that subsequent owners of the Property are bound hereby. The parties agree that recordation is proper as a conveyance restriction under Government Code §27281.5. C. In entering into this Memorandum, the parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys, who are the attorneys of their own choice, and that these terms are fully undertaken and voluntary accepted by them. The parties further represent that they have no questions with regard to the legal import of any term, work phrase, or portion of this Memorandum, or the Memorandum in its entirety, and accept the terms of this Memorandum as written. 105779-00010 988149.19 19 D. Each Tract Owner on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges and agrees that this Memorandum is valid, lawful, and binding upon it and its successors and assigns. E. Memorandum constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and this Memorandum supersedes all previous negotiations, discussion, and agreement between the parties to this Memorandum with respect to its terms, and no prior evidence of any prior or other agreement shall be permitted to contradict or vary the terms hereof, except for the Development Agreement Specific Plan, the land use entitlements for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, and the First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Operating Memoranda. F. Except for the terms specifically set forth in this Memorandum clarifying and modifying the terms of the Development Agreement and Specific Plan, all other terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan, shall remain in full force and effect. G. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated hereby this reference. H. The City agrees that representatives of the City and representatives of the each Tract Owner will meet as frequently as reasonably necessary to discuss the status of the construction of the infrastructure and improvements and any problems encountered or anticipated with respect thereto. I. Each Tract Owner warrants and represents to the City that it has obtained all required third party approvals of this Memorandum with respect to its execution of this Memorandum. J. This Memorandum shall not be effective and shall not be recorded until such time as all persons with an interest in the Property, or holding a deed of trust in the Property or a portion of the Property, have duly executed a Consent and Subordination in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney. Each Tract Owner warrants and represents to the City that there are no deeds of trust, or other similar financing documentation, encumbering all or any part of its property. K. The following Exhibits are attached to this Memorandum and incorporated herein as though set forth in full: Exhibit A-1 Exhibit A-2 Exhibit A-3 Legal Description of Sunwood Property Legal Description of BHT Property Legal Description of Wingsweep Property L. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, any and all notice or other communications required or permitted by this Memorandum or by law to be served on or give to a party to this Memorandum by another party shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly served and given when personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed or to any officer of that 105779-00010 988149.19 20 party, or, in lieu of personal service, on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, Certified, postage prepaid, addressed to: 105779-00010 988149.19 21 To Sunwood: Sunwood Roripaugh Ranch LLC 2600 Laning Road San Diego, CA 92106 Attention: Mr. Donald R. Faye With Copy to: Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, LLP 401 West "A" Street, Suite 2600 San Diego, CA 92101 Attention: Tim Waters, Esq. To BHT: BHT - Roripaugh WB99, LLC 400 Continental Boulevard, Suite 450 El Segundo, CA 90245 Attention: Mr. Stephen Hester To Wingsweep: Wingsweep Corporation c/o UNICOM Systems, Inc. 15535 San Fernando Mission Boulevard Suite 310 Mission Hills, CA 91345 Attention: Mr. Corry Hong To City: 105779-00010 988149.19 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager (signatures on next pages) 22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and the Tract Owners have signed and entered into this Memorandum as of the day and year first above written. 105779-00010 988149.19 CITY OF TEMECULA Ron Roberts Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney Tract Owners: SUNWOOD RORIPAUGH RANCH LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company By: SUNWOOD AND ASSOCIATES a Delaware limited liability company, Its: Manager 23 By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: 105779-00010 988149.19 BHT - RORIPAUGH WB99, LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: WINGSWEEP Corporation A California Corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: 24 EXHIBIT "A-1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUNWOOD PROPERTY All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Lot 7 of Tract No. 29353-1, in the City of Temecula, as shown on map recorded in Book 334, Pages 21 to 24 inclusive of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. EXHIBIT "A-2" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF BHT PROPERTY All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Lots 1 through 100, inclusive, and Lots A through I, of TRACT NO. 29661-2, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as shown my map on file in Book 355 Pages 5 through 8, inclusive, of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. EXHIBIT "A-3" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF WINGSWEEP PROPERTY All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Lot 1 of Tract No. 29353-1, in the City of Temecula, as shown on map recorded in Book 334, Pages 21 to 24 inclusive of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. EXHIBIT A-4 DEPICTION OF SUNWOOD PROPERTY, BHT PROPERTY AND WINGSWEEP PROPERTY (see attached page) Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Sean Dakin, Fire Marshal DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment with ProActive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc. for an additional amount of $29,000.00 to increase the existing contract amount to $59,000.00. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2010, the City Manager approved an agreement for $30,000.00 with ProActive Fire Design & Consulting, a fire protection consulting company that performs plan check service for the Fire Department on an as needed basis. Plan check service is utilized when fire prevention staff experiences an increased level of applications that exceed their ability to process plan submittals within acceptable timeframes. The Fire Department went through the formal RFP process in May of 2010 and received several responses/proposals for service. The panel reviewed all proposals and chose two companies, Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc. and Broadspec, Inc. The City entered into agreements with both companies based upon the panel's recommendation. On November 8, 2010, Broadspec stated that their fee for service must be increased from 40% of the fire plan check fee to 80%, or have their agreement terminated. Staff determined that a 40% increase in Broadspecs fee is not fiscally minded and chose to terminate the agreement. Due to the termination of Broadspec's agreement, there has been a significant increase in plan reviews sent to Proactive Fire Design. It is now necessary to increase the agreement for service from $30,000.00 to $59,000.00 through June 30, 2011. The additional funds will allow us to provide quality customer service and effectiveness through the end of the fiscal year. The increase is currently budgeted in the 2010/2011 operating budget and is available through the termination of Broadspec's agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the current fiscal year 2010/2011 Fire Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Contract Amendment SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW SERVICE THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of January 25, 2011 by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2010, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Service", in the amount of $30,000.00. b. On August 4, 2010, the City and Consultant entered into the First Amendment entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Service", to remove paragraph 4, the Prevailing Wages section from the agreement and to clarify paragraph 5, the Payment section to read correctly. c. The parties now desire to increase the payment for services in the amount of Twenty Nine Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($29,000.00), as well as, revise the Written Notice section to notify Consultant of the Temecula City Hall address change effective date, and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 4. of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Second Amendment amount shall not exceed Twenty Nine Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($29,000.00) for additional Fire Department Plan Review Service for a total Agreement amount of Fifty Nine Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($59,000.00)." 3. Section 13 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (11) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Use this Address for a Delivery Service: City of Temecula or Hand -Deliveries ONLY Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Don Walton, President Jo Marie Walton, Secretary Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Proactive Fire Design, Inc Don Walton, President 45686 Hopactong Street 951-695-3539 Proactive.fd@verizon.net FSM Initials: Date: 0/0/70 3 Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: 5 -Year Agreement for Animal Control and Sheltering Services Between the City of Temecula and Animal Friends of the Valleys (aka L.E.A.F.) PREPARED BY: Tamra Irwin, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the five year Agreement for Animal Control and Sheltering Services between the City of Temecula and Animal Friends of the Valleys at a cost of $247,500 annually. 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve additional service not to exceed $30,000 annually. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has contracted with Animal Friends of the Valleys, formerly L.E.A.F., since 1995 for animal control services. Animal Friends of the Valleys has performed very well during this period, and City staff, including the Police Department has been very satisfied with the services they provide. On April 24, 2005, the City Council approved Temecula's participation in a Joint Powers Authority referred to as the Southwest Communities Financing Authority (SCFA). The member agencies of the SCFA include the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake and the County of Riverside. The express purpose of the JPA is to fund and construct an animal shelter, located in Wildomar, that will serve the region. The construction of the Southwest Communities Shelter was completed in September 2010, and the grand opening was held in October. The Southwest Communities Financing Authority Joint Powers Authority contracts with Animal Friends of the Valleys for shelter operations at the new animal shelter. Services include vaccination clinics, adoption clinics, impoundment of stray animals, licensing, and food, shelter and care for animals that have been lost, abandoned, or surrendered by their owners. The cost to the SCFA for the Operations Agreement is estimated to be $868,784 per year. The cost per agency has been determined by the percentage of use by each member agency. Temecula's share of the shelter operation equates to $10,625 per month in FY 10-11 with actual costs to be reconciled at the end of each year. The total compensation to Animal Friends of the Valley includes monthly shelter operation costs in the amount of $10,625 and animal control services monthly costs of $10,000, for a total monthly amount of $20,625 for FY 2010-11. These rates are based on the estimated shelter budget. There will be a final adjustment on the last shelter invoice based on actual shelter expenditures to true up the shelter payment. The annual sheltering costs are set based on Temecula animal counts. The updated sheltering rates wil be presented to the City Council in May of each year once they are approved by the SCFA JPA board. This process will ensure the City Council is aware of Temecula's annual contributions, which will also be adopted as part of the annual Operating Budget. FISCAL IMPACT: All costs associated with this contract in Fiscal Year 2010-11 have been included in the Operating Budget and future costs will be budgeted accordingly in future Fiscal Years. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement For Animal Control and Sheltering Services Between the City of Temecula and Animal Friends of the Valleys (aka L.E.A.F.) AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL AND SHELTERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS (aka L.E.A.F.) THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of January 1, 2011 between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Animal Friends of the Valleys ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2011, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2016, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Contractor shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Schedule for Animal Control Services, and Exhibit C Payment Schedule for Sheltering Services attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B and C other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. The animal control services amount shall not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($10,000.00) per month and One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($120,000.00) annually unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Exhibit C is based on the number of animals housed in the shelter annually. The current amount is for Ten Thousand and Six Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and No Cents ($10,625.00) per month for sheltering services and One Hundred Twenty seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($127,500.00) annually. Staff will amend this Exhibit to the City Council annually in May for final spending authorization. These amounts are dependent upon the number of animals housed in the shelter allocated to the City of Temecula and are subject to change. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work up to Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($30,000.00) annually. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for the contract amount as described in Section 4a. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within 1 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 6. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR. a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of 2 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Contractor shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. than: a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 4 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City's prior written authorization. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third 5 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Use this Address for a Delivery Service: 41000 Main Street Or Hand -Deliveries ONLY Temecula, California 92589 Attention: City Manager To Contractor: Animal Friends of the Valley 33751 Mission Trail Wildomar, Ca 92595 (951) 674-0618 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval or who participates in its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interests described in this paragraph is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set 6 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 7 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Ron Roberts, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Animal Friends of the Valley 33751 Mission Trail Wildomar, CA 92595 (951) 674-0618 By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: (Two Signatures of Corporate Officers Required For Corporations) 8 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx EXHIBIT A Scope of Services 1. Services To Be Provided. Contractor shall operate a complete animal control program for the City consisting of, but not limited to, field services, and licensing. Animal Friends of the Valleys will provide 1 %2 full time Animal Control Officers, a fully equipped vehicle, and shelter for the City of Temecula's animals. The Animal Control Officers will be serving the City of Temecula 12 hours per day, 5 days per week, as well as, after hours, week -ends and emergency calls. In the conduct of this program, CONTRACTOR shall perform the following specific functions: (a) Enforcement. Enforce all applicable provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code (Animal Control) as it exists on the date of this Agreement pertaining to animals, including the issuing of warning notices or citations as necessary for violations of such Ordinances. In the event the Municipal Code is amended and the amendments would substantially alter the duties and responsibilities of CONTRACTOR under this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to meet and in good faith renegotiate those terms and conditions of this Agreement affected by such amendments. (b) Sheltering. Animals are to be sheltered in accordance with Southwest Community Financing Authority (SCFA) standards as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding with Animal Friends of the Valley. (c) Impound. Impound all animals caught at large and collect all impound fees assessed on behalf of the City; accept stray animals brought in by private citizens; provided, however that identified, vaccinated, spayed or neutered cats shall be released as required by the Temecula Municipal Code. (d) Quarantine. Quarantine as prescribed by law all animals suspected to be rabid. (e) Complaint Investigation & Resolution. Investigate and pursue action on complaints and/or reports of potential violations of Municipal Code relating to animals, including unnecessary noise, in accordance with such procedures adopted by the City; respond to requests from the County Fire Department and contract law enforcement provider for assistance with animal related situations. (f) Dead Animals. Remove dead animals from the public right-of-way within City limits and from other areas upon request. (g) Potentially Dangerous/Vicious Animals. In accordance with the Temecula Municipal Code, identify potentially dangerous and/or vicious animals and initiate the administrative or legal process for their control. (h) Trapping & Removal. As limited by subsection (b) above, respond to requests for assistance in the trapping and removal of domestic or wild animals, including coyotes and skunks, from public or private property. CONTRACTOR will offer advice in setting a trap in any enclosed space and will remove belongings, or will maintain on - premises surveillance unless in the Officer's or his or her supervisor's opinion there is a 9 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx direct, clear and present danger to human life or injury. Identified cats will be released as required by Temecula Municipal Code. CONTRACTOR will provide traps but will not be required to provide vector control. CONTRACTOR shall charge a fee for traps as set out in the City's Animal Control Fee Schedule as approved by Council action. (i) Dog Licensing. (i) CONTRACTOR shall implement a comprehensive licensing program including conducting dog license inspections. Area -wide canvassing will be conducted as part of the field service activity. CONTRACTOR shall administer the current licensing provision of the Temecula Municipal Code. (ii) Dog licenses shall be issued by mail, at the Animal Shelter, at vaccination clinics and by Animal Control Officers in the field. CONTRACTOR shall send renewal notices by mail to owners of currently licensed dogs, and shall send an application for licensing when requested by owners. (iii) CONTRACTOR shall, at Contractor's expense, provide the forms and tags for such licenses, and shall affix a professionally prepared sign at the Animal Shelter, stating applicable fees for licensing for the City. (iv) CONTRACTOR shall collect all license fees and penalties on behalf of the City, issue receipts for all such fees collected and keep copies thereof. The remaining license revenue collected will be applied to the budget for City services under this contract. Revenue shortfalls, below the estimate, will be the responsibility of Animal Friends of the Valley. (v) All administrative citation revenue will be remitted to Animal Friends of the Valleys on a quarterly basis. (vi) CONTRACTOR shall pursue collection and/or prosecution, if appropriate, to recover any fraudulent, delinquent or worthless payment received as payment for dog licenses issued, including penalties. (vii) CONTRACTOR shall cancel any dog license issued for which invalid payment was received, and give notice of such cancellation to the licensee. (viii) CONTRACTOR shall maintain such records in such form as required by the City's Director of Finance so as to provide for proper cash management and for review and audit of the monies collected. CONTRACTOR shall furnish the City a monthly report detailing the licensing activities. (j) Animal Bites. Investigate reported animal bites. CONTRACTOR may initially receive animal bite reports by telephone, but also shall respond in person to all reported bites by dogs or other suspected rabid or wild animals. CONTRACTOR shall take appropriate steps consistent with the circumstances of each separate incident to locate and quarantine the suspected animal(s) and/or assist the complained and/or injured party or parties to trap the suspected animal(s). (k) Disposition of Unclaimed Animals. After notice and hearing as required, provide 10 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx euthanasia service in a humane manner in accordance with procedures approved by the City Manager for unlicensed animals held for five (5) days and licensed animals held ten (10) days or more, if these animals are not reclaimed by their owner and are deemed unsuitable by the Officer for adoption. (I) Clinics. Make all necessary arrangements and conduct at least two (2) one -day clinics for rabies vaccination and licensing of dogs each year which are open to City residents and which may be located in the City, or may be held in conjunction with the City of Lake Elsinore. (1) Field Services. Assign two and a half field service officers appointed as Animal Control Officer. Routine field services will be provided as necessary within the hours limitation of this Agreement. The number of hours per week include, but are not necessarily limited to routine mobile patrols, investigative and rescue time, court appearances and impoundment of dangerous, wild, injured or loose animals. CONTRACTOR shall assign a sufficient number of field service employees to duty at all times to meet the needs of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall provide service of twelve (12) hours per day during such hours as approved by the City Manager. Telephone service for members of the public shall be not less than eight (8) hours per day on a schedule approved by the City Manager. Emergency response shall be available 24 hours per day, seven days per week as described in subparagraph (m). CONTRACTOR shall advise fire and law enforcement authorities serving the City of Temecula of the telephone numbers to access its services and shall cooperate with such authorities in developing the procedures necessary to provide after hours services. (m) After -Hours. Provide a field service person either on duty or on call after regular hours as necessary to respond to emergency calls. The City and CONTRACTOR agree that any incident reported to CONTRACTOR or City staff, through the fire or law enforcement provider involving a dangerous, wild or stray injured animal, constitutes an emergency and requires immediate action by CONTRACTOR. When the City Manager or his or her designee has reason to believe that an animal control emergency exists, the Manager or his or her designee shall notify CONTRACTOR and request a prompt response. If CONTRACTOR fails to respond to such request within a reasonable time or fails to respond at all, the City shall request in writing that CONTRACTOR send to the City a written explanation giving the reason(s) for the delay in responding or the failure to respond. Contractor's written explanation shall be submitted to the City Manager within two (2) working days from the date of the request for emergency service. This Agreement and the provisions herein shall not be construed to limit the interpretation of what constitutes an emergency and/or the need for a priority response. The following examples are illustrative of the need for an immediate response from CONTRACTOR. (1) Requests to remove a wild, dangerous or injured animal or animals from an inhabited place or vehicle; (2) Reported animal bites involving loose animals; and, (3) Livestock, fowl or game birds being attacked or killed by dogs or other 11 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx animals. (n) Public Relations. Provide service to the public on matters covered in this Agreement consistent with established policies and procedures that promote courteous and efficient service and good public relations. Other policies and procedures notwithstanding, CONTRACTOR in processing any type of complaint or request for service will indicate to the caller when a response can be expected from CONTRACTOR and how CONTRACTOR will respond. In the event an in-- person response is appropriate to the specific situation, CONTRACTOR shall make such response by the end of the following business day. This provision shall be subordinate to shorter time limits specified elsewhere in this Agreement. (o) Complaints Regarding Service. Cooperate with the City to resolve any and all complaints filed with CONTRACTOR and/or the City pertaining to services provided under this Agreement. The City shall submit to CONTRACTOR in writing all complaints filed with the City concerning services provided by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall report monthly in writing to the City the number of complaints received by CONTRACTOR directly or indirectly through the City pertaining to quality of service(s) provided under this Agreement. (p) Legal. Coordinate with City and City Attorney any inspection warrants impounds or potential dangerous/vicious animal hearings or court actions. (q) Records. Maintain and keep timely, complete and accurate records of the receipt and disposition of all animals delivered into its custody. CONTRACTOR will file a report with the law enforcement provider within twenty-four (24) hours if an impounded animal is missing or suspected to have been stolen. CONTRACTOR shall indicate on the police report the circumstances of the animal's disappearance and make available to the City Manager the designated report or file number. (r) Communications Equipment. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide radio equipment and frequency as necessary for effective performance of its obligations hereunder and in order to provide law enforcement backup for its field personnel. (s) Other Equipment. CONTRACTOR shall provide all vehicles and equipment necessary for the performance of this Agreement and shall be responsible for maintenance of such vehicles and equipment, including the installation and removal of the paging or radio equipment described in Paragraph (q) of this Section. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for all costs relating to theft, vandalism, or destruction of said equipment by fire, accident or intentional acts. (t) Personnel & Supplies. CONTRACTOR shall provide all personnel, supplies, and equipment necessary for the efficient and effective operation of the Animal Shelter and animal control services and programs provided for herein, including, but not limited to Animal Control Officers, clerical staff, license tags and forms, citation forms, notices and all necessary envelopes and postage. Animal Control Officers will complete the required training in accordance with Penal Code 832 or its equivalent, and such other training as may be required by law, before being issued a badge and given the authority to perform Animal Control duties. Humane Officers will complete the required training in accordance with Corporations Code 14502. 12 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx (u) Attendance at Meetings. Provide input and coordination on amendment of City animal control fees and ordinances and shall attend City Council and other City meetings as required or requested to do so. 2. Coordination. Contractor's Executive Director and the City Manager shall meet not less than quarterly to discuss Agreement performance. 3. Reporting. (a) CONTRACTOR shall furnish the City monthly reports detailing shelter, field, licensing and identification activities, including a summary of the utilization of field service employees' hours required in Section 1 above and the records required by Section 1(P). (b) CONTRACTOR shall maintain and keep records of all expenditures and obligations incurred pursuant to this Agreement and all income and fees received according to generally recognized accounting principles. Such records shall be maintained by CONTRACTOR for a minimum of four (4) years following the termination of this Agreement unless a lesser period is approved in writing by the City Manager. The records and/or animal control operations of CONTRACTOR shall be open to inspection and audit by the City or its authorized representative as is deemed necessary by the City upon reasonable notice to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall provide the City a copy of Contractor's full Annual financial statement immediately upon completion thereof, but in no case later than six (6) months after the close of each fiscal year. 4. CONTRACTOR shall also implement the following programs on a continuing basis: (a) Public School presentations (b) Spay/neuter subsidy programs for low income persons (c) Cable television Announcements and educational messages (d) Ordinance review and changes aimed at ending pet overpopulation (e) Animal Rescue Plan for domestic animals during disaster (t) State Humane Officer services 5. In addition, CONTRACTOR will consult with the City and on any policy/procedure that affects Temecula animals, which shall be approved by the City Manager prior to implementation. 6. Contractor shall charge License Fees for dogs within the City as follows: a. Altered dogs $15.00 for 1 year b. Altered dogs $20.00 for 2 years 13 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx c. Altered dogs $25.00 for 3 years d. Unaltered dogs $35.00 for 1 year e. Unaltered dogs $70.00 for 2 years f. Unaltered dogs $105.00 for 3 years g. Senior Citizen's dogs $8.00 for 1 year h. Senior Citizen's dogs $10.00 for 2 years Senior Citizen's dogs $12.00 for 3 years j. Late penalty of $20.00 per license 14 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES The City shall pay a monthly flat rate to Contractor in the amount of $10,000.00 per month for animal control services for a total of $120,000 annually for the term of the Agreement. 15 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx EXHIBIT C PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR SHELTERING SERVICES The cost for Sheltering Services in FY 10-11 will be $10,625 monthly. Costs for sheltering services will be based on Temecula's proportionate share of animals being housed in the shelter. Temecula's percentage has been in the 15% - 20% range historically. The animal shelter budget will be approved by the Southwest Community Facility Authority JPA Board and the annual animal count will also be certified by the Board. The City's annual sheltering costs are based on these animal counts. Staff will amend this Schedule in May of each year. These costs will be reflected in the Annual Operating Budget. 16 C:\Program Files \Neevia. Com\Document Converter \temp\988885. docx Item No. 8 ORDINANCE NO. 11-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS WITH OR WITHOUT A CAR WASH IN PLANNING AREA 10 UTILIZING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 3, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA09-0246, Specific Plan Amendment; PA09-0287, Conditional Use Permit; and PA09-0288 Development Plan B. The proposed amendment to the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan will amend the permitted uses and development standards for Planning Area 10 to the standards of the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district with the addition to allow automobile service stations with or without and automated car wash. In addition, the Specific Plan Amendment application is accompanied by a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan application. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA") and circulated for public review from October 12, 2010 through November 1, 2010 for a 20 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. E. On November 3, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on November 3, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended R:/Ords 2011/Ords 11-01 1 that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application No's. PA09-0246, Specific Plan Amendment; PA09-0287, Conditional Use Permit; and PA09-0288, Development Plan. H. On January 11, 2011, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 11-08 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code [Subsection 17.16.20 (Procedures) of Chapter 17.16 (Specific Plan Zoning District) of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code]. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The Specific Plan Amendment identifies a car wash as requiring a Conditional Use Permit and clarifies that the property will be subject to the Development Standards identified for the NC -Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. Car washes are a common ancillary use for a gas station and this proposal meets the development standards for car washes under section 17.08.040.D of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed and conditioned for approval by Building and Safety, Fire, Police, Public Works, and Planning through the Development Review Process (DRC) to ensure compliance with the General Plan, Development Code and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; R:/Ords 2011/Ords 11-01 2 The Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire, Police, Public Works and Planning to ensure that the use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Furthermore, the project is consistent with the requirements of the General Plan and Development Code, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. D. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The Specific Plan Amendment would facilitate development of an automated car wash attached to an existing gas station. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the car wash. Loading, parking, and vehicular circulation will not be adversely affected by the project. The project will adhere to all other development features described in the Development Code. E. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure development of a desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; The Specific Plan Amendment would allow a car wash to be located within Planning Area 10 of the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan, which is within a heavily traveled commercial corridor that is fully developed. Surrounding uses include a high school, commercial and residential development. An Initial Study has been prepared and mitigation measures have been included to address noise impacts from the car wash blowers on surrounding commercial and residential development. With these and other mitigation measures identified, the project will not adversely affect adjacent uses, buildings or structures. Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan to allow automobile service stations with or without a car wash in Planning Area 10 subject to the development standards of the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District of the Specific Plan and in accordance with the revised Specific Plan on file with in the City of Temecula City Clerk's Office. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. R:/Ords 2011/Ords 11-01 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2011. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Ords 2011/Ords 11-01 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 11-01 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 11th day of January, 2011, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2011, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk R:/Ords 2011/Ords 11-01 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Item No. 9 ACTION MINUTES of January 11, 2011 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District Meeting convened at 7:54 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 15 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) — Director Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Director Roberts and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve the action minutes of December 14, 2010. CSD Action Minutes\011111 1 CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:55 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 25, 2011, at 5:30 PM., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] CSD Action Minutes\011111 2 Item No. 10 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Youth Work Experience Program Partnership PREPARED BY: Charles Walker, Human Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the Memorandum of Understanding between Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center and the Temecula Community Services District to establish a youth employment work experience program. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has successfully provided youth employment opportunities to approximately 400 youth through the Mayor's Summer Youth Employment Program for the past two seasons. As clearly identified in the Youth Master Plan, Temecula's youth desire and need employment opportunities and experiences which allow them to acquire important job readiness skills necessary for future employment success. Through the joint funding efforts of the federal government, Riverside County and the City of Temecula, the seasonal program was made available. Recently, staff from the Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center proposed entering into a partnership with the Temecula Community Services District to provide a year-round youth employment program for Temecula youth ages 16-21. The partnership will allow for twenty-five eligible youth, to work up to 300 hours each in the program. The TCSD's overall responsibility will be to provide the work sites, supervision, required documentation and in-kind contributions, and program office space. The Center's responsibility will be to confirm eligibility, all aspects associated with wages, pay roll processing, and overall program oversight. This exciting program allows for the Temecula Community Services District to enter a unique partnership with Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center, who receives federal funding through the Workforce Investment Act via Riverside County to provide up to 7,500 hours of paid employment experience to Temecula youth at no direct cost to the City. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the TCSD is valued at $15,000 of in-kind contributions. The in-kind contributions will include a temporary work space and minimal staffing support from the Human Services Manager and support staff as appropriate. ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum of Understanding between Oasis Youth Opportunity Center and the City of Temecula. WORK DE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center and Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Parties Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center, described herein after as "AGENCY" is the lead administrative entity, authorized and existing under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998. Temecula Community Services District (TCSD), described hereinafter as "PARTNER," is a service provider. PARTNER and AGENCY enter into this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) documenting their PARTNERship regarding the comprehensive array of year-round WIA services to youth ages 16-21 years old. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term The term of this MOU shall commence when the MOU is signed by AGENCY and PARTNER. The MOU shall remain in effect until June 30, 2011 and shall thereafter renew for successive one-year terms, unless terminated by the repeal of WIA, by action of any applicable law, or otherwise in accordance with this section. Either party may terminate this MOU by giving written notice of intent to withdraw at least thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the effective withdrawal date. Notice shall be given to the party at the address set forth below. The site location for AGENCY services will be at: 351 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite F, Perris, CA 92570 The site location for PARTNER services will be at: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 2. Description of Services A. PARTNER Responsibilities 1. PARTNER will provide hands-on work experience sites and supervision of youth assigned within the TCSD. 2. PARTNER will provide mentoring and guidance to all youth in work experience. 3. PARTNER will generate and submit timesheets for all youth assigned to work experience bi-weekly for AGENCY to process payroll for all enrolled and assigned youth with the TCSD. 4. PARTNER will conduct evaluations and provide feedback to youth in work experience. Page 1 of 6 5. PARTNER will provide facilities as needed for customized training workshops. 6. PARTNER will provide in -take eligibility to all youth residing in the City of Temecula. 7. PARTNER shall attend scheduled partnership meetings to obtain updated information and provide updates on partner services. B. AGENCY Responsibilities 1. AGENCY will conduct the recruitment, intake -eligibility, enrollment, and work readiness certification. 2. AGENCY will refer eligible and qualified youth for the Work Experience Program to the TCSD. 3. AGENCY will be responsible for all wages up to 300 hours per youth and will process payroll for 25 youth assigned to the TCSD for the Workforce Investment Act program. 4. AGENCY will provide oversight of the Work Experience Program. 5. AGENCY will collect evaluations for all youth in work experience to ensure completion of the Work Experience Certification. 3. Funding Costs of Services As between the parties, this MOU is a non-financial MOU. (WIA funds are not being requested for payments to PARTNER.) 4. Method of Payment (Not Applicable.) PARTNER shall submit itemized monthly invoices and sufficient backup documentation to Arbor Education & Training certifying that required services were performed. No accrual of disallowed costs is permitted. PARTNER's final billing will be due thirty (30) days following the end of the MOU term. 5. Partnership Funding Allocation PARTNER agrees to provide In -Kind Contributions in an amount valued at $15,000.00 during the term of this agreement. The AGENCY will maintain written record of the contributions and report it monthly on the Universal Invoice, Cash or In -Kind Match Detail report. PARTNER will provide a quarterly In -Kind Invoice to AGENCY for records. 6. Disallowed Activities The following activities are disallowed under this Memorandum of Understanding: 1. Political activities (WIA 195 (6). 2. Charging participants a fee for placement or referral into a WIA activity (WIA) 195 (5). Page 2 of 6 3. Displacement of employees by any WIA participants [WIA 181 (b) (2) & (3)]. 4. The promotion or deterrence of union organization [WIA 181 (B) (7)]. 7. Referrals The parties agree to make written referrals to one another for services and activities to individuals, where appropriate. Referrals shall be made with respect to each party's target group, eligibility requirements, and performance standards and expectations. The parties will jointly develop and implement mutually acceptable processes for intake and referral and will train their staff on the services of each participating PARTNER. The parties agree to evaluate this process periodically and to modify it based on changing requirements and/or agreed upon needed improvements. 8. Licenses PARTNER, its employees, and agents, shall maintain professional licenses required by local, State, and Federal laws at all times while performing services under this MOU. 9. Amendments The parties may, upon mutual written agreement, amend this MOU at any time during its term. The amendment(s) must be in writing and a copy of the amended MOU shall be forwarded to the county within ten (10) days of execution. 10. Criminal Background Checks PARTNER shall conduct criminal background checks through the California Department of Justice of all employees providing services to the AGENCY pursuant to Education Code 45125.1. PARTNER shall provide a signed certification stating that criminal background checks have been conducted and that no employee has been convicted of any serious or violent felonies, as specified in Penal Code Sections 1192.7 (c) and 667.5 (c), respectively. PARTNER shall also provide a list of all employees providing services to the AGENCY. 11. Confidentiality The parties will share information regarding clients, applicants, and other customers only to the extent that such sharing does not violate WIA, other applicable statutes or ethical standards or requirements. All such shared information shall remain private and confidential, shall not be published by either party, and shall not be shared with, divulged, or given to individuals or groups not a party to this MOU, unless the disclosure of such information is required by the Page3of6 California Public Records Act. A client must be informed in writing that the parties intend to share information about him or her and consent in writing thereto before that information may be shared. 12. Indemnification AGENCY agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the PARTNER, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all liabilities for injury to persons and damage to property arising out of any negligent act or omission of AGENCY in connection with this Memorandum of Understanding. PARTNER agrees to indemnify and hold harmless AGENCY from any and all liabilities for injury to persons and damage to property arising out of any negligent act or omission of the PARTNER, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers in connection with this Memorandum of Understanding. In the event PARTNER and/or AGENCY is found to be comparatively at fault for any claim, action, loss or damage which results from their respective obligations under this Memorandum of Understanding, PARTNER and/or AGENCY shall indemnify the other to the extent of its comparative fault. 13. Insurance PARTNER and AGENCY will maintain professional liability, general liability, and Workers' Compensation Insurance. The degree of coverage should commensurate the types of service, the population to be served, and the level of potential risks. The PARTNER and AGENCY warrant they have adequate professional liability, general liability and Workers' Compensation to provide coverage for liabilities arising out of the PARTNER's and AGENCY's performance of this Memorandum of Understanding. A copy of the insurance policy shall be maintained on site by the AGENCY. 14. Additional Provisions The PARTNER, at their expense, may utilize AGENCY's shared, web -based, electronic case management system, if the PARTNER so desires, if it meets the system's hardware and software requirements. Mutual Responsibilities: Health and Safety Standards Both parties will ensure that all facilities meet health and safety standards established under state and federal law [WIA 181 (B) (4) & CFR 667.274]. Page 4 of 6 Discrimination Clause The parties to this MOU shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee, applicant for employment, or participant for services provided under this MOU because of race, color, age, religion, sex, national origin, disability, political affiliation or belief, and for beneficiaries only, citizenship or participation in the WIA Title 1 financially assisted program or activity as specified in Section 188 of WIA. Parties to this MOU will assure compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA. 15. Monitoring As part of the required duties in the performance of this MOU, the AGENCY shall monitor WIA program activities of its collaborative PARTNER's including but not limited to fiscal management, invoices, and services rendered to the partnership. The AGENCY shall submit a written report of the monitoring and if applicable, any findings should be noted. Copies of monitoring reports must be available for review by the County, State, and Federal monitors or auditors and shall be maintained in files at the AGENCY's office. Monitoring of all sub -recipients shall be completed by the end of the fiscal year 1 st quarter. 16. Dispute Resolution Process The PARTNER agrees to use the Local Workforce Investment Area's grievance process to resolve disputes. 17. Conformity with Applicable Law In providing all services under this MOU, the PARTNER shall abide by all applicable Federal, State, and local statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and standards, as well as the standards and requirements imposed upon the AGENCY by Federal and/or State agencies providing funding to the AGENCY for the purchase of supplemental services. 18. Governing Law This MOU shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 19. Termination This MOU may be terminated, with or without cause, by either party by giving 30 days written notice of intention to terminate by certified mail, such period beginning upon receipt of notice. Page5of6 Notwithstanding any of the provisions of this MOU, PARTNER's rights under this MOU shall terminate (except for fees accrued prior to the date of termination) upon PARTNER's bankruptcy, death or disability or in the event of fraud, dishonesty, or a willful or material breach of this MOU by PARTNER or, at AGENCY's election, in the event of PARTNER's unwillingness or inability for any reason whatsoever to perform the duties hereunder. In such event, PARTNER shall be entitled to no further compensation under this MOU, it being the intent that PARTNER shall be paid as specified in Sections 3 and 4 only during such period that PARTNER shall, in fact, be performing the duties hereunder. 20. Sole Agreement This Agreement is the only MOU between the parties relating to the subject hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representative of each party does hereby sign and date this document as set forth below. Name of AGENCY: Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center Dated: By: Authorized Signatory of PARTNER, Title Name, Title: Rosa H. Penaloza, Program Director Name of PARTNER: Temecula Community Services District Dated: By: Authorized Signatory of PARTNER, Title Name, Title: Page 6 of 6 TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT Item No. 11 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail Zigler, Administrative Assistant Phase 1 of the Redhawk Park Improvement project is nearing completion. The Redhawk Dog Park is complete, the parking lot renovations are complete, the half -court basketball court is complete. These amenities are now available for use. Staff anticipates the restroom and hydro - seeding portion of the project to be completed within the next 25 days. The park is being used heavily by dog owners from the region. A conceptual design for the Old Town Gymnasium project was completed and approved by the Community Services Commission and City Council. The new gymnasium project will include the construction of a regulation size basketball court, restroom facilities, seating for spectators and an office. The project is currently in design development and we anticipate the plans to be completed by the end of March and ready for bid, The Recreation Division is currently planning for the activities and events which highlight the spring season including our annual Special Games and the Easter Egg Hunts. The Recreation Division is also currently carrying out the classes and activities offered through our Winter/Spring Guide to Leisure Activities. During the next couple of months, staff will be putting together the classes and activities for the summer/fall activities guide. The TCSD Maintenance Division plays an integral role in assisting with the many citywide special events held each month. In addition, the Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance and rehabilitation of all City parks and facilities. At the January 10, 2011 Community Services Commission meeting the Commission honored and thanked Wayne and Mary Bershaw for their donation of a 61" color television they donated to the teen center. The television is now in place in the teen center and the CRC. Sunset Park, which is part of the Redhawk Park Project Phase 1, continues in the construction process. Hardscape has been completed and additional planting and irrigation must be completed. The Escalier House and Barn are now open and being used by the Community Pantry for their community service programs. Due to the heavy rains in December, the contractor was not able to complete the exterior landscaping around the building. The parking lot improvements have been completed and the landscape improvements should be completed within the next three weeks. At tonight's Board of Directors meeting the Board will consider the approval of a MOU between the Oasis Perris Youth Opportunity Center and the TCSD. If approved, the program will provide employment for approximately 25 youth working 300 hours each during the school year. Youth who participate must be eligible and between the ages of 16 and 21 years of age. The program has no fiscal impact to the City. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Item No. 12 ACTION MINUTES of JANUARY 11, 2011 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING The Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meeting convened at 7:55 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Mike Naggar ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Washington, Roberts, Naggar RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 16 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Agency Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Agency Member Washington and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the action minutes of December 14, 2010. RDA Action Minutes\011111 1 RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS RDA ADJOURNMENT At 7:58 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 25, 2011, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Chair Person ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] RDA Action Minutes\011111 2 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT Item No. 13 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Redevelopment Department November/December Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. REDEVELOPMENT Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Lease of Commercial Space in the Old Town Parking Garage - The Agency and the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau have executed an Office Lease for commercial space in the Old Town Parking Garage. The Convention and Visitor's Bureau is currently in the process of working with the architect of the Civic Center project to design the tenant improvements. These improvements are estimated to be complete February 1, 2011. Town Square Market Place - As part of the Civic Center Master Plan, the City has created a development opportunity for approximately 52,000 square feet of commercial and office space surrounding the Town Square along the reconfigured Main Street. The Agency issued a Request for Interest to select a preferred development partner. On August 26, 2008, the City Council entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Pelican Properties to develop the project. Pelican has participated in several meetings with Old Town stakeholders and adjacent property owners. They have worked closely with Staff on site planning issues. On January 22, 2009 the Executive Director granted a three-month extension to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement which expires on May 26, 2009. Due to the state of the economy Staff recommended the Agency extend the ENA an additional six months. On May 26, 2009 Agency Board approved a six (6) month extension to the ENA. Agency Staff met with the Agency sub- committee in February 2010 and received direction to take an extension of one year with the possibility of an additional one year administrative extension which the Agency approved on March 9, 2010. Agency Staff and Pelican Properties have been in continuous contact as we make progress towards a first draft of the Development Agreement. Auto Mall Sign - The Agency and Auto Dealers Association have entered into a Loan Agreement for a loan from the Agency to the Auto Dealers Association in the amount of $875,000 for a state of the art high definition marquee sign. Part of the agreement stipulates that the City will have 10 percent of the time between sunrise and 11:00 p.m. daily to use the sign to promote City interests. The sign will be located on the parcel south of Rancho Ford. The old sign will be removed before the new sign can receive final approval from the building official. Currently the foundation and structural support beam have been constructed. The construction of the electronic sign itself is anticipated to begin on January 10, 2011. Per the first Amendment to the Loan Agreement, the Auto Mall sign shall be completed on or before January 31, 2011. Facade Improvement Program - The Facade Improvement Program provides funding assistance to Old Town business and property owners to provide exterior improvements to their buildings and property. Funding in the amount of $80,000 is available during FY 2010-2011. As of July 1, 2010 the Agency began accepting applications for the program. The following facade improvements are in process or recently completed: • Emporium Center — Facade Renovation (in process) • Temecula Stampede — Exterior repairs and paint (in process) Abbott Cardiovascular Systems OPA Payment - On February 12, 2002 the Agency Board approved an Owner Participation Agreement ("OPA") between the Agency and Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (formerly Guidant Cardiovascular Systems). The purpose of the OPA was to provide development incentives through property tax reimbursement. In order to receive the reimbursement Abbott was required to meet certain thresholds including minimum square foot expansion to its physical plant (90,000 square feet) and to add and maintain 300 full-time jobs within its Temecula Facility. Per the OPA, the fiscal consultant of the Agency was directed to analyze and determine the amount of the reimbursement due to Abbott. The reimbursement is based on property tax increment generated as a direct result of Abbott's physical plant expansion. The Agency has verified that Abbott has met the thresholds to reimbursement as stated in the OPA. The Agency's fiscal consultant has conducted a review of the amount of reimbursement due to Abbott, and the reimbursement will be delivered to Abbott by February 1, 2011. HOUSING R.C. Hobbs Exclusive Negotiating Agreement - The R.C. Hobbs Company approached the Agency regarding the possible development of mixed income affordable housing on vacant Agency owned property located at 28640 Pujol Street. Considering Hobbs' background and recent Staff experience working with the organization, Staff felt that Hobbs would be a quality partner on an affordable housing development at the aforementioned location. Hobbs requested that the Agency and Hobbs enter into an ENA with a one-year term with a potential six month extension by written approval of the Executive Director. The Agency approved the ENA at its February 9, 2010 meeting. An appraisal for the subject property was commissioned by the Agency and completed on June 24, 2010. The Agency and R.C. Hobbs continue to negotiate potential development on the subject site. First Time Homebuyers Program - On July 22, 2008, the City Council approved an amendment to increase the loan amount for down payment assistance from $24,000 to $65,000. This down payment assistance allows qualifying households to purchase homes in the $200,000-$300,000 price range. As of July 1, 2010, the Agency began accepting applications for FY 2010-2011. Currently, one loan in the amount of $48,000 has been funded for this fiscal year. Summerhouse - The Agency negotiated an Owner Participation Agreement ("OPA") with Summerhouse Housing Partners L.P for the purchase and development of the Summerhouse community. The Agency Board approved the OPA on September 22, 2009. The OPA terms require the development of 70 affordable units at very -low income, 20 units at moderate income, and 20 units at senior affordable income, for a total of 110 affordable units. The terms of this agreement place affordability restrictions on the property for 55 years. Immediately following the close of escrow, Summerhouse Housing Partners L.P. began clean- up and restoration of the site. A Development Plan has been approved by the City and construction of the 20 units is nearing completion. Residential Improvement Program - The Residential Improvement Program provides funding assistance to low and moderate income level homeowners to do exterior improvements to their home and property. The program budget for FY 2010/2011 is $200,000. The Agency began taking applications for the program July 1, 2010. There are currently 32 applications being processed for this program. PUBLIC HEARING Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: An Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, Islamic Center of Temecula Valley, a two -Phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot structure located on 4.32 acres within a VL zone at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA08-0241 AND PA08-0242, A TWO- PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TWO-STORY, 24,943 SQUARE FOOT RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 4.32 ACRES WITHIN A VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE COLIBRI (APN: 957-140-012) BACKGROUND: On October 14, 2008, Stephen Sigler of Axis 3 Architecture, Inc., behalf of the Islamic Center of Temecula, submitted Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit application designed to allow for the construction of a 24,943 square foot religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. The Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit applications were unanimously approved by the Planning Commission after hearing public testimony on December 1, 2010. At the Planning Commission hearing, members of the community (including appellant Mr. George Rombach) spoke in opposition to the project. The opposition has focused on several issues related to legal requirements, project design, and operational characteristics. Legal issues consist of requirements related to the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Brown Act. Project design and operational issues consist of automobile parking, emergency evacuation, minaret height and hours of operation. RECOMMENDED ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS FOR APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING In hearing appeals from actions of the Planning Commission, the Council has utilized the following schedule of comments for the public hearing. Staff has outlined this schedule in this Agenda Report so that all persons interested in the hearing will be apprised of the schedule in advance of the public hearing. The Council is authorized to modify the schedule as appropriate. 1. Staff Report/Council Questions 2. Appellant Presentation — 20 minutes 3. Applicant Presentation — 20 minutes 4. Public Hearing 5. Appellant Rebuttal — 10 minutes 6. Applicant Rebuttal — 10 minutes. APPEAL: On December 15, 2010, Mr. George Rombach (appellant) filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242. Attached to this report is the Agenda Report for the Planning Commission hearing on this project. The Planning Commission report provides a detailed explanation of the Project and the analysis of the planning issues. This report to the City Council focuses on the contention's and concerns raised in Mr. Rombach's appeal and the Staff's response to them. Parking Appellant's Contention. Appellant's states that any formula used to caluclate parking for religious facilities must be based on the operational charateristics of the religion being analyzed. The formula used by the Development Code is intended to calculate the parking needs for western style churches. As a result, it is incapable of insuring that adequate parking will exist for Muslim facilities. The insufficient parking requirement generated by the Development Code will cause the surrounding streets to be overburdend and thus endanger the public safety and welfare. Staff Response The City Development Code provides a formula for calculating parking for religious facilities. It does not make distinction between religious denominations. This is consistent with Development Code regulations in cities throughout the State of California. The proposed Project has met all Development Code requirements related to parking. Per Table 17.24.040 of the Development Code, religious facilities shall be parked at a rate of one space for every three fixed seats, and one space for every 35 square feet of assembly area where there are no fixed seats. A Mosque does not use fixed seats. Staff calculated parking based on the assembly area and determined that Phase 1 will require 91 parking spaces (104 provided). The Phase 1 sanctuary will cease to be utlized as a sanctuary after construction of Phase 2. Consequently, the Phase 1 sanctuary square footage is not included in the calculation for Phase 2 parking requirements. Thus, the Phase 2 sanctuary will require 98 parking spaces (181 provided). The Project will have adequate parking for both Phases as required by the Development Code. Additionally, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has released the 4th edition of their Parking Generation Report. An analysis of Mosque parking requirements was included in the Report. The ITE Report used the total square footage of each facility analyzed in their calculations instead of only the prayer areas. This means the analysis factored in meeting rooms, classrooms, and all other areas of the facilities studied. The study concluded that 6.3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area is needed to ensure adequate Mosque parking. Using the ITE Report parking supply ratio, Phase 1 of the Project (4,157 total square feet) will require 27 parking spaces; 104 spaces are provided. Phase 2 (24,943 total square feet including that of Phase 1) will require 158 parking spaces; 181 spaces are provided. The Project provides for a total of 181 spaces for both Phases. Traffic Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that the traffic study was released five days before the hearing and as a result, did not give the public enough time to review the document. The study has four main issues: (1) the times of day studied avoid the heaviest usage and "rush hour" of the two adjacent churches and the Mosque; (2) analysis of street locations in relation to the ingress and egress of the Project was not conducted; (3) accident history was not evaluated; and, (4) infrastructure improvements should be completed immediately and not in the future by another developer. The Project will result in more area traffic which creates a substantial burden on the religious exercise of the adjacent churches and the free access of the residents in the area thus violating RLUIPA. Staff Response The study was made available for public review on November 24, 2010. The analysis revealed that the applicant will need to provide as mitigation, a two-way left turn lane along the Project frontage on the eastbound approach of the Nicolas Road/Calle Colibri intersection to make impacts for the Project less than significant. The study intersections were selected based on criteria identified in the guidelines established by the County of Riverside's Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide, which is used by the City. The days and peak hours studied were based on the actual operations of the proposed use. Accident history is not typically included in this type of study because a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is a planning tool that is used for forecasting demands on the transportation network that are associated with new development based on accepted practice. Road improvements are designed and modified to minimize accidents. If a road or intersection has a higher incident of accidents then the Public Works Traffic Division analyzes the issue and recommends modification to the Public Safety Traffic Commission for their approval. Roadways analyzed in the traffic study did not have a higher incident of traffic accidents than what is typical found. The roads are designed to carry traffic volumes both currently and if and when the Project is developed. Future traffic infrastructure improvements are expected to be developed as part of the development of residential projects in the surrounding area. The traffic study prepared for the Project indicates there are no significant traffic impacts. It also states that impacts created by the Project can be mitigated to a level of no significance. Since traffic for the Project is considered insignificant with mitigation, there should be no impact to surrounding religious facilities, therefore no violation of RLUIPA will occur. Emergency Evacuation Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that Calle Colibri will become congested during an emergency as vehicles attempt to leave the area. This will not allow access for rescue vehicles. Staff Response The Project has been designed and conditioned to ensure that all required improvements to Calle Colibri will be completed. These improvements include: Phase 1, the developer shall construct: A. Calle Colibri from the northerly driveway to the southerly terminus of the cul-de-sac to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Phase 2, the developer shall construct: A. Calle Colibri from Nicolas Road to the northerly drive approach to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). B. Nicolas Road, from westerly property boundary to Calle Colibiri, to include installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlight, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) including pavement transition per Caltrans' standard. All road improvements required meet emergency vehicle access standards and have been reviewed and accepted by the Fire and Police Departments. Therefore emergency access on Calle Colibri will not be impaired by this Project. Environmental Issues Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that Grace Presbyterian Church was required to complete an Environmental Impact Report while the proposed Mosque was only required to complete a Mitigated Negative Declaration. In addition, no evidence was presented that all appropriate agencies were notified. Staff Response The Initial Study for the Project was drafted and routed to all appropriate agencies on May 28, 2010. Comments received from outside agencies were incorporated into the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The study revealed that Project impacts could be mitigated to less than significant levels. As a result, an Environmental Impact Report was not required for the project. The City's project file for Grace Presbyterian Church (PA02-0257) shows that the Church was not required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for approval of its facilities. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Grace Presbyterian Church project in the same manner as the subject application. Flood Plain Issues Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that other religious facilities have been told they could not build in the area near the proposed Project because of the flood plain. In addition, City officials are trying to remove the property from flood plain designation. Staff Response The Initial Study developed for the Project examined the potential flood risk as required by CEQA. Mitigation measures have been incorporated to ensure impacts are less than significant. The City has prepared a preliminary flood plain analysis irrespective of the proposed Project as the area in general has not been official been mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on City flood plain analysis, Grace Presbyterian and Calvary Baptist have been able to develop in areas that are clearly out of the flood plain. In both cases, the facilities have located parking lots in what is believed to be the flood plain. This is consistent with FEMA regulations. The Project has been conditioned that only Phase 1 of the project can move forward immediately if the Project is approved. Construction of Phase 2 cannot begin until the applicant submits a CLOMAR (Conditional Letter of Map Revision) to FEMA to obtain an official detemination as to what is the actual flood plain limit. Once this is obtained and it clearly identifies that Phase 2 structures are out of the flood plain, then the applicant may proceed with Phase 2. If FEMA determines that Phase 2 of the Project is within a flood plain, the applicant will be required to redesign, if possible from an engineering standpoint, the Project to insure that all buildings are located above the flood plain levels before they are able to move forward with Phase 2. This redesign would trigger the need for a Major Modification to the Conditional Use Permit which would require a public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider the redesign. While the applicant is required to prepare the request to FEMA, determining the actual flood plain limit will be of benefit to all property owners in the Nicolas Valley area. Other Churches Have Been Denied Permits Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that other religious organizations have inquired about constructing facilities in the same area as the proposed Project and that these requests have been denied. Staff Response Staff has reviewed applications for other religious facilities in the area of the Project since incorportation. These applications have included an expansion of Calvary Baptist Church, the construction of Grace Presbyterian Church, and applications related to the construction of a Kingdom Hall of Jehovah Witnesses facility. These projects were approved by the City. Height of Minarets Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that the "Equal Footing" intent of RLUIPA will be violated if the crescents for the proposed project are taller than the steeple for Calvary Baptist Church. Staff Response The height of the minarets (40 feet) are within Development Code requirements. For comparison, the height of the steeple for Calvary Baptist Church is 55 feet at grade and 60.5 feet at the bottom of stairs facing Calle Colibri. The maximum overall height of the proposed facility is 43 feet at grade, including minarets and crescents. This height meets Development Code standards and is less than the height of the steeple for Calvary Baptist Church. Additionally, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC) reviewed the project and concluded that its height will not have an impact on French Valley Airport. The following mitigation was recommended by the Commission and these mitigation measures have been incorporated into the condtions of approval: • The following uses shall be prohibited: o Any use which would direct steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. o Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. o Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. o Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. • Any outdoor lighting that is installed shall be hooded or shielded so as to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. • The attached notice shall be provided to all potential purchasers and tenants of the property and shall be recorded as a deed notice (notice is attached to the Mitigation Monitoring Program). No Sunday Services Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that conducting Sunday school will increase traffic congestion. The project should be prohibited from operating on Sundays. Staff Response The traffic study analyzed this issue and concluded that traffic impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels with the recommended mitigation on any day of the week. Since traffic can be mitigated on Sundays as well as other days, there is no valid reason to prohibit services on Sunday. Substantial Burden Issues as to RLUIPA Appellant's Contention: Appellant contends that the "Substantial Burden" verbiage within RLUIPA requires that the project should be moved to a new location. Staff Response The proposed Project will be located within a Very Low (VL) density zoning district. Religious facilities are permitted within VL zones upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Project was granted a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission on December 1, 2010 consistent with the City's Development Code standards. Impacts on other religious facilities and uses in the area of the Project were studied as part of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that there are no substantial impacts on other religious facilities or uses in the area of the Project. No Impartial Review Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that City officials have violated the Brown Act in the following ways: (1) attempting to conduct a hearing without posting a notice at the site; (2) posting a notice on the wrong property and allowing it to fall; (3) releasing a memorandum changing future Planning Commission dates to the new Civic Center; and, (4) releasing a Resolution indicating Project approval. Response Notices of the public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council fully comply with state law and the City's Development Code. The City of Temecula Development Code and state law require that notices for public hearings shall be posted not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing. The City is prohibited from conducting pubic hearings without legal notice. No such attempt occurred. Originally it was intended to schedule the public hearing for late August of 2010. Based on concerns raised by those in opposition to the Project, the Project was delayed while the applicant voluntarily agreed to pay the City to have a traffic study prepared for the Project. The Project was then noticed for a November 17, 2010 hearing. However, the Public Notice sign was inadvertently posted on the wrong property. The meeting was cancelled and a press release was sent to local media explaining the error and the need to postpone the hearing to December 1, 2010. A new sign advertising the revised hearing date of December 1, 2010 was posted on the correct location on November 9, 2010. Staff visited the site every day between this date and the date of the public hearing and verified that it remained in place on each day. In addition new notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1300 -foot radius of the proposed Project , consistent with Development Code Requirments, which stated the hearing had been rescheduled to December 1, 2010. An Agenda Report for the December 1, 2010 Planning Commission agenda provided for the official designation of the new City Hall as the location for future meetings of the Planning Commission as required by the Brown Act. The new City Hall was opened for meetings in the new Council Chambers on December 14, 2010, so the Planning Commission meeting of December 1, 2010 was the last meeting before the move. This Agenda Report was listed as Item 2 in the Consent Calendar section and the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley was listed as Item 3 in the separate Public Hearing Items section. In addition, the December 1, 2010 Planning Commission Agenda clearly identified 43200 Business Park Drive as the location of the hearing location. Further all mailed notices to surrounding property owners clearly noted the date of the meeting and the location at 43200 Business Park Drive. A draft Resolution of Approval for the proposed Project was also included as part of the December 1, 2010 agenda. This was a draft prepared by the Staff consistent with the Staff's recommendation for approval of the Project. The resolution would not be a binding legal document until approved by a vote of the Planning Commission following the public hearing. The Brown Act requires that all documents to be acted on by the Planning Commission be placed in the Agenda packet for public review prior to the meeting. The placement of this document is not only legally required but is standard practice for public hearing items so the public can see the specific findings proposed for the Project. If the Planning Commission had denied the request on December 1, 2010, staff would have been directed to return with a Resolution of Denial at the next Planning Commission meeting. No Consideration of SB 375 Appellant's Contention. Appellant contends that SB 375 is designed to lessen sprawl and that SB 375 was never considered as part of the Project analysis. Staff Response The City of Temecula General Plan, through the Land Use Element, governs development activity within the City. The element does this by identifying the proposed general distribution, location, and extent of land uses including residential commercial and office, light industrial, public/institutional and open spaces areas. This ensures responsible growth for the City on a macro level. Senate Bill 375 is designed to be implemented within this macro context. Implementation for the Bill is conducted by the State's Metropolitan Planning Organizations in an effort to create a sustainable community strategy at the regional level. SB 375 thresholds apply to an individual project only if a developer requests a streamline CEQA review or exemption. No such requests were made by the developer of the proposed Project. Other Documentation Appellant's Contention. The appeal listed a variety of attachments as support of the positions presented. Several of these attachments were not provided to staff as of the printing of this report. These items include video of the parking and traffic at the Corona Mosque and video of the traffic conditions at the intersection of Calle Medusa and Nicolas Road. Response Staff is unable to comment on documentation that was not provided for review. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution December 1, 2010 Planning Commission Staff Report Appeal Application and Corresponding Attachments Planning Commission Resolution No. 10-26 December 1, 2010 Planning Commission Minutes Public Correspondence STAFF DRAFT OF RESOLUTION NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL VOTED ON BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA08-0241 AND PA08- 0242, A TWO-PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TWO-STORY, 24,943 SQUARE FOOT RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 4.32 ACRES WITHIN A VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE COLIBRI (APN 957-140-012) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Stephen Sigler of Axis 3 Architecture Inc. representing the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley filed Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 on December 1, 2010 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. On December 15, 2010, George Rombach filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242. E. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 on January 25, 2011 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 2. Findings. The City Council in approving Planning Applications PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 (Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code. STAFF DRAFT OF RESOLUTION NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL VOTED ON BY CITY COUNCIL Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed use as a compatible use within residential areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; As conditioned, the project has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the Initial Study process to further ensure that the project has been designed and appropriately conditioned so that it will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E) A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; The proposed religious facility is located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. Religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in VL zones. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed use is for a religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. According to the City of Temecula Development Code, these types of uses are allowed in all residential districts upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Custom single-family homes surround the project on all sides with the exception of the east side. An existing religious facility lies to the east of the proposed project. As designed and conditioned, the project will not adversely affect adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, STAFF DRAFT OF RESOLUTION NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL VOTED ON BY CITY COUNCIL landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; As designed and conditioned the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features required in the City of Temecula Development Code have been satisfied. As a result, the project will integrate into the surrounding area in much the same way as the immediately adjacent existing religious facility. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The project is a religious facility to be located in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. Religious facilities are a permitted use in VL zones with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. As designed and conditioned, the project is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which contains provisions to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for the Conditional Use Permit will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project: A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Project as described in the Initial Study (the "Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. STAFF DRAFT OF RESOLUTION NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL VOTED ON BY CITY COUNCIL B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Planning Department. Prior to December 20, 2010, the Planning Department Offices were located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California and beginning December 20, 2010, at 41000 Main Street, Temecula California C. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all written and oral comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the January 25, 2011 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it, finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and, (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. D. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. The Director of Planning and Redevelopment is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA. Section 4. Decision. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby denies the Appeal and approves Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 (Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. STAFF DRAFT OF RESOLUTION NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL VOTED ON BY CITY COUNCIL PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of January, 2011. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of January, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUM MARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 1, 2010 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Approve with Conditions Mitigated Negative Declaration w/ Monitoring Plan Section 15070 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Stephen Sigler, Axis 3 Architecture, on behalf of owner, Islamic Center of Temecula Valley Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning Designation: Very Low (VL) Residential Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant Lot/Very Low (VL) Residential North: South: East: West: Nicolas Road - Single Family Home/Very Low (VL) Residential Single Family Home/Very Low (VL) Residential Existing Religious Facility/Very Low (VL) Residential Single Family Home/Very Low (VL) Residential Lot Area: Total Floor Area/Ratio: Landscape Area/Coverage: Parking Required/Provided: Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required 4.32 Acres 2.5 Acres Minimum .13 Proposed .20 Maximum 55% Proposed N/A Phase 1: 104 Proposed 91 Required Phase 2: 181 Proposed 98 Required BACKGROUND SUMMARY On October 14, 2008, Stephen Sigler of Axis 3 Architecture, Inc. submitted Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit application designed to allow for the construction of a 24,943 square foot religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. No daycare or formal educational institution is proposed as part of the project. The applicant has proposed to construct the project in two phases. Phase one of the project will feature a 4,157 square foot building. This structure will include a prayer hall, restrooms, and a storage area. The site plan for phase one illustrates that parking will be located mostly at the rear of the structure. Landscaping will be placed between the front of the structure and Nicolas Road. Phase two of the project will consist of a 20,786 square foot two-story expansion of phase one. The expansion will include a new prayer hall and several offices and classrooms. These rooms will be used in a manner typical for religious facilities in that they will create space for activities such as religious study and counseling. Parking will be added along the front of the structure in the second phase. The existing prayer hall will be converted to multi-purpose space. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project site will be constructed on a parcel totaling 4.32 acres in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. Nicolas Road borders the subject property to the north and Calle Colibri is a cul- de-sac bordering the property to the east. The subject property is surrounded by custom single- family homes to the north, south, and west. An existing religious facility is located immediately to the east across Calle Colibri. Phase one of the project will consist of a one-story 4,157 square foot religious facility. This structure will contain a prayer hall, restrooms and storage space. A playground will also be provided at the east side of the building. Ingress and egress to the site will occur at two points. The primary access to the facility will be placed at the southern end of Calle Colibri. This entrance will take patrons into the parking lot in which the applicant will provide 104 spaces. For phase one, 91 spaces are required per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. The site plan also shows that decorative stamped concrete will be used in the areas consisting of the disabled parking spaces. The pedestrian walkway leading from the southernmost portion of the parking to the facility also features the same decorative paving. A seven -foot retaining wall will be installed at the southern end of the parking lot. This retaining wall will be designed to match the fencing around the property. The plans call for the area between the structure and Nicolas Road to be landscaped until the construction of phase two. A secondary entrance has been provided on Calle Colibri and is located approximately 200 feet south of Nicolas Road. For phase one of the project this point of access will lead to the parking lot through a decomposed granite path within the landscaping just described. This vehicular access path will be removed upon the start of construction of phase two. Phase two of the project will consist of a two-story, 20,786 square foot expansion to phase one. This structure will contain a prayer hall with a balcony replacing the prayer hall in phase one, classroom space and offices. According to the Statement of Operation, the classroom space will be devoted to Sunday School programs. The Statement of Operations also indicates that no other classroom activities will occur during Sunday School and that no classroom activities will occur during Friday services. Access to the facility will remain the same as phase one with the exception that the decomposed granite travel lane will be paved. The disabled spaces and pedestrian walkway will feature the same decorative concrete as phase one. The phase one sanctuary will cease to be utilized as a sanctuary after construction of phase two. Per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code, parking for religious facilities must be parked at a rate of one space per every 35 square feet of assembly area where there are no fixed seats. Phase two will require 98 parking spaces based on this calculation. As part of phase two, the applicant has elected to provide an additional 77 parking spaces to the original 104 for a total of 181 parking spaces at the completion of the project. Architecture The project includes many design elements typically found in traditional Islamic architecture, but also contains many elements of Mediterranean architecture which is widely found in Southern California. For example, the applicant has chosen to use mission style clay tiles for much of the roof with the exception of the dome, and a tile mosaic has been proposed for sections of the exterior wall. Stucco will also be incorporated in the project. The stucco will use three different neutral colors to create accents for both phases of the structure. Two minarets have been included in the design. These traditional Islamic architectural elements have been carefully blended into the project in order to ensure they are in visual harmony with the rest of the structure. They will also be the same height as the main structure. The dome and a portion of the roofing for the minarets will feature a metal roof consisting of the color Cool Copper Penny. This type of roofing has been done in the City before, most notably at the Penny Dome building in Old Town located at 41888 Fourth Street. The project will feature a total building height of 40 feet. The limit for structures in a Very Low (VL) residential district is 35 feet. However, per the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.06.050.G), certain architectural elements may exceed the zone height limit by no more than 15 feet. The overall building height of the project does not exceed this 15 -foot threshold. Fencing will surround the property and will incorporate wrought iron elements with interspersed pilasters that will provide a decorative appearance. Landscaping will also be provided along the fencing were it is adjacent to the public right-of-way to help soften its effect. Landscaping Landscaping for the project will feature a variety of trees shrubs and ground cover plant material. These plant materials will surround the property and will thus serve as a way to soften the hardscape features such as pedestrian walkways, drive isles, and parking areas. Phase one of the project will feature wildflower hydroseed mix landscaping in the area that will contain phase two. This effectively means that landscaping during phase one will cover nearly the entire area between the structure and Nicolas Road and help create a finished look for phase one. The hill immediately above the retaining wall located at the southern end of the property will also feature an abundance of landscaping including Magnolia trees and Cape Mallow shrubs. Landscaping for the parking areas for both phases have been designed to include landscape planters at the end of each parking row and a minimum 5 foot landscape planting area along the perimeter of the entire parking area. All planting areas will utilize drought tolerant plants. These design features are consistent with the City of Temecula Development Code (Section 17.24.050. H). Traffic The applicant voluntarily agreed to the development of a traffic study. This study study was prepared by KOA Corporation under the direction of the Public Works Department Traffic Division and submitted to the City on November 11, 2010. Based on the intersections and roadways evaluated, the study reveals that if the recommended mitigation is followed, the proposed project will not result in a significant impact on the city's circulation system. In order to ensure a complete and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project's impacts, KOA Corporation analyzed the following intersections: • Winchester Road and Margarita Road • Winchester Road and Nicolas Road • Nicolas Road and General Kearny Road • Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri • Walcott Lane and La Serena Way The following cumulative projects were also included in the analysis: Project Name Size Land Use Kingdom Hall of Jehovah Witness 8,264 Square Feet Religious Facility Saraphina 67 Single -Family Homes Single -Family Residential Roripaugh Ranch 2,015 Single -Family Homes Single -Family Residential AM/PM Car Wash 946 Square Feet Commercial Gas Station Car Wash Walcott Estates 45 Single -Family Homes Single -Family Residential The traffic study analysis of the intersections and cumulative projects listed above revealed that the applicant will need to provide, as mitigation, a two-way left turn lane along the project frontage on the eastbound approach of the Nicolas Road/Calle Colibri intersection. Project impacts at this intersection will be made less than significant with the inclusion of this measure and it is included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. The study also revealed that intersections of Winchester Road/Nicolas Road and Winchester Road/Margarita Road are operating and will continue to operate at unsatisfactory levels of service. This is a result of existing uses compounded by a heavier traffic load when the pick-up time for Chaparral High School (2 p.m.) and the proposed Roripaugh Ranch project to the east are added to the analysis. Recognizing that the Level of Service and delays at intersections along Winchester Road are currently operating less than satisfactory, the City of Temecula has initiated the implementation of an Adaptive Traffic Signal System to mitigate conditions. The adaptive system monitors traffic flows system wide and adjusts traffic signal cycle lengths to address the changes in traffic flows, minimize delays, and improve system progression. By virtue of this continual monitoring, intersection LOS is improved significantly, typically by 10 to 15 percent. The implementation of the adaptive system will be completed by April 2011. The traffic study utilized the adaptive system to analyze the operation of the intersections of Winchester Road/Nicolas Road and Winchester Road/Margarita Road and found that it will mitigate the intersections to a level of no significant impact. Operational Characteristics The applicant has submitted a Statement of Operations as part of their application materials. Per the Statement of Operations, hours of operation for the religious facility shall be as follows: Monday through Thursday: 5:30 a.m. — 6 a.m. and 8:30 p.m. - 9:15 p.m. Friday: 12:15 p.m. — 2:45 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Saturday (last week of the month): 7:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Sunday (Sunday school): 9:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m. The Statement of Operations indicates that no other types of classroom activities will be conducted during Sunday school sessions and Fridays will consist of religious services with no classroom activities occurring simultaneously. In addition, no daycare facility will be included as part of the project. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on November 17, 2010 and mailed to the property owners within the required 1300 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. An Initial Study was prepared for the project in an effort to further evaluate if the project would generate any potentially significant impacts to the environment. This document was distributed and made available for public review on May 28, 2010. The results of the Initial Study show environmental impacts for the project are all less than significant with the mitigation proposed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program developed for the project. FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.050.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed use as a compatible use within residential areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. As conditioned, the project has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the Initial Study process to further ensure that the project has been designed and appropriately conditioned so that it will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E) The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed religious facility is located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. Religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in VL zones. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed use is for a religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. According to the City of Temecula Development Code, these types of uses are allowed in all residential districts upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Custom single-family homes surround the project on all sides with the exception of the east side. An existing religious facility lies to the east of the proposed project. As designed and conditioned, the project will not adversely affect adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. As designed and conditioned the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features required in the City of Temecula Development Code have been satisfied. As a result, the project will integrate into the surrounding area in much the same way as the immediately adjacent existing religious facility. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project is a religious facility to be located in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. Religious facilities are a permitted use in VL zones with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. As designed and conditioned, the project is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which contains provisions to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for the Conditional Use Permit will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Statement of Operations PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study Mitigation Monitoring Plan Responses to Initial Study Traffic Study Public Correspondence Notice of Public Hearing 0ce>' hi°LUI hi HIGHLAND VISTA CIR — .� SO_NIA�,,� a LN ./ �� PARK I S .11 QVISTA CIR v P • & TERRAEE t' 'tom Y Z VIEW CIR 1') CHE ��PKY 1 _ EAST';,�.011� ik • x Au. at' . � 111 -tj al ^ HILLGREST .3 DONS= p\- oak f JR me$ ■ ■ 0 iQ MOO MEW NE= MI MN 111 imomm SKYLINE ar ti PA08.0241 1 1 11111111WAuui/h:11 R ❑ cc w 1 Maw MOM X1111 Ce 0 0 01 w �70N C,Tff OOK-RDi RITA WY Project Site GATLIN RDS e- 110 - Irn it G Ia • l o<V.P S„ --S01 1 PA ; 4k 4111 Pit tramo AR swim. priso di 1* O 01‘11)'cn c• i iog op, tcock 500 1 ov cro�_ ar, tfrAr 441.rs got( • Oar 1,000 2,000 Feet 7 \\X A 1 1-.-1-VIAtNORTE-11---L 000 I . n±5-AI5 ,6 . Sr S-09 facg, aftlaanag ymoatag 4 1.1109,9139091091g1 4 . ,, -0-0, I'd laaaa 1-04121.94199 99410391911 1" Flaid sncgion3d tuoi =.3.a.h. 1 I 1 z 1 DRAWING INDEX 4- „, V .. 11 gg ..„ „, .,„ .',,, JI! 1 igl ; II u 5 g WE PROJECT TEAM 0 '" 49 4 1 1 g 4 x 4 ' ag g_ ggIS a Pt 55552 /5 a . a r dONC-0-0. I Id SC g! ;i g gsg8 Si '.. .., ,._.8. q . py,t, „.. i tl. , 113 54 a - 14 - a 11 ALYSIS PLANNING DEPT.NOTE E: NpARKIG SUMMARY 2 6 r g :§ ijq, , . , . - s s III, 11111111111111111 I OCCUPANT LOAD & PARKIN ii ;i i ?,. ' v 5atgaltaa 9449. Z2m...M4,4042,ZO.Z 21, Z. Pat4M-,." ..,,,Z2 1111 11111 11111 1 . ,„,, gill gill Iiiii g ;8922 EL1111 11111 11111 . ;1 .. . , a a a 8 88 49 S.-0 . ..., ., , . g.g, g , e _Ig, [FIE 10010 Igii0 'r.', 1 i ,, LIIM III!! 11111 ."5 11 - ;a. 1. 1 i 0 ' g i 50 ' 5; 5 0.05 MINI Iiiii 11111 1 .4 01111 ]1111 111111 1 g >-- U-1 4 t n @ v i m Ilylt lalffell ., t 1 0 01000000000001 1 aummooli011V1„, 110000000 o dtvitontli 551555555550 000 AIN 1 ,13)(1 ,Oly 'i ,,\ Olt i 1 'NO Al I 1 r Z \ SITE ANALYSIS , 5 I 5 ; g g ; .,,...., -g. 5 .• ; N4 -- BUILDINGAAL Y . i !, 1 g F i 1 i f. - t t I .g , ,... e - ENTER OF IBRI ROAD, TEMEC NON 0 V111111111 v10110 0,0111 OMEMM 10145.4 R, t WI q Ul 8 g 5 g . 4 it 1 P g =t 1 1 H ' { g 0 5 k a 4 1 a ihz ;LE i - - • I SYMBOLS LEGEND VIi i.1.11' . 11 E.,'” EIJ 6 19 555 5 a i ; i ' g i 5 0 ABBREVIATIONS p51bb5 00 ' i5 t 05 t , 1 1 , i 555 wt., 55555 5'55giia5 5°541'01;05 a 55 aiiiiiiiii5i5ga 50 r 0 1 5 ; '5 ,„ g P i 557.757.155511555557.74.55 °1511 BzdrilaJL11-12:1'te ,11X' il I I 14 11 15,' 54 i 2 t 5 F • X ID El SBOC30 E11,1051015530171 0E0E1 0 DO EIC31T5]CjEMCitIO (i i 1 411 <I 1 i 1 11 i i 1 1 ,51 mbrau ronstoArmo rtarkinak 5t. tams naat Wm A131,14.50 Owcw item4f4/55N55. moo arms 14046 vumadUrro. Y111123112. Ainnvd SI101D1138/1101 =Brost tu ruut . 551, 441 tttai 055f15,15.5-1 55if, 1550 ag p,1 4455 f7,04X7di 41.1.01105d 0 NOLLV5Ildd1101404.4;149 Et, Is 2 11 oil I III II 1 II 11111151H 111 GO ti St1455DIN 1 b4,441.15. (4. In.411.7* OSSZ4 VA141:4111:0 "e-iro;k5.1 4, 411114 04314 cxa es ; x5: A101 5 A11110Vd SnO1V112 A101 640b Isono, 41'4,,D C140.4 $410DIN 1.6446 47lie04114.3 Ar1flx1.131 133,04a aD- 4 LULL Zisn-GiCaf.5 1.6 0-80Yd # NOI1V311ddsd CNINNsrld a ENLARGED- �N'' 2)f1i �11F1 2i'd £SIXd ri 1-1,7,N0.1. 05526 e3HNOjRY 'tMO31e V.31.15 003KOki 8812r A.LOI bx"VD icp • 4 4 Hill Z6Z0 d07d 8 12W-2ONd # NOLLVOIlddt4 UNINNtnd w z O w S z 0 O 0 ENLARGED- ? CV ITAY11141 0806 11fINNOAll.Tn vorkoawat airs 00aq 01U 616Zro AirnovJ snolDnmi ALoi CZTOd MVO 3TTVO Otl0t1 W1COIN mrs amoxvo V1117:11N31, narObd rvAramiencrow-va.a •loomommo,...161.0noirt61.,..tr, mn,Mbr.b.Ludowakroona,....14,1n Mmnynnome,grooPmarm,i, u•Aillv,mw•OuNntr.." .• ,; lddV NN d -a a n1 111-i'5-gc, "L Dew' fii5 ifI-EDZJ V ESIX`v' z3xv11$ ry i7vsNo3 05SL6 v 131OSPP3n'01 V3,Z9 M0Ixx:.Vp AiflIDVd snoFOE726 nlOI aeortrm 1 1666 V.ow , 1UlO3}131 ZO-BOVd V Lp 0-80Vdii NOLUV011chitl ONINNVid -g ru_3ili--I521d ESix e >I3X1.H5 fY=.YL:0o ossta eiwstobrwo Yrnoarra6 .Y. .3.1.1,1S- 009. as eaur Ai3S ll.l.11I Vdsno13113aIILa 0,11}6 W8rI0> 317Vo90Cotl SVloNN S S :6gtb Ytpt101i,YO Yifi�3roL l�ifObE m lnem®.. •�r�'TASrrti:4il.. _ __.. _ _ ..•�.m.ai��.ta.-.a-� .._..,. J. Ar14.1—i441, '44 099Vd 8 5420-90tld# NOLLtlDIIddV'JNiNNVId 0 ¢ 0 z O U u1 0 0 0 0., -RN ru_AIIH caeca voagoArra ''rnalwarak, wart wax, coveccr 01 in 0 17+0b .1100 Tn., V cm. 6,10X1 L Wrnalaila, VIoDainal snonn3a ALL 2 411111 DtOOVfl fozcrativd 1;'Nonivn4 EJ g4 6 6 1.4 E3 SODDED 3 0 6L3 3C30 E3 111I1IIIII111111 CIVOei Sv10D114 fini KkYNOTES: 13.[TAS, .5251.1.4X.Ee ^e15.ral 2+.11.....oar a..Lz, njoi IttI vfmoD,e-r. ^nno.. SY1O5IN kiniovd snoio 'au A.L31...-G. tram... I ac-sa. s perarenrdev,m., t.• x,,,,,,,,...2.-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.: t - ".'--.,.. s.14sUriR.,',.:st .:, ''i 31 H,' -:,',,F 7.• -7-, .,,E:-..•...Ri'F'i ,,... ;'.:t.. • F :!. j t sR s.14sUriR.,',.:st ''i ; 7.• -7-, fl11 ligitliffa 11 it , - a •5' thwrtS VA?. revOarir] 322^.-somm A131 L vIna... COU,0111. 711.3 CO, WI,. Ainiovd snolorGel /2101.rz. C11111 11111 iraroove v 1 riC-02.111ouvmddv mvpas^ne i r MEM ill 1111 il IIP:',7•57,k,:,),I 7.1F.Zr ya ' p FrS tl IMMUNE!! MEM ill 1111 il V11311 t 1, 1 ii 1 II 1 11 1 flHII 1 I . i 1 11 i ii I h gli - I' iiiihnhi 11 lo 111 I 1 &p. 1 li 13 111 1 li 1 h 11 hi ;Oh -.44444 44.- e flJDJJHThV ix 106,4.0....****.nrodrawarMaulareroweNortia,..o tano...eommrwrtnalror'w,. ,Oppamodg Ih !!! oN, liZONS =VIM. tO;LP SIWRIC.PeD V14011‘311. 31.1r6 003.X1:1131a* !UZI AJLIllOW Sf10101138 A191 CoMo Itlarltltl UV. .1n0011V wee eweedwo enettect .0,b111,1 V 0100 00000 1111111 1011111 ,0 AF•04 00000 ,0010° filieestmenet E_4, •aNr15":67-ioiiii x -v, tr,n1,,V.n. %Uo vv.0111ya v. 3f.n... ca3v ma" N.01 LhXvrvvolv0. VIn0311. Cos�rtD)r,v, aeCE ,unovd snoien2aAI I11 -qc A 2.-2,...Vev tr.... sr 1.1011‘nneev ohvvvel., . , . . NI . • • I 1111 • • • I 0 . • i mrM ERAMRs E...... 'net ru_5411-145- ' ',' i>c•,:e METAL FENCE PRIVACY FENCE 11. MONUMENT SIGN h31R1,15 re I3V12:03 06526 VIVaDdI=1,3 Inronaitai aiirlv.041,., ON ggi.y. ALOI AillIOVJ S11010112JA1.01 AIM IL CreCat 1[1911007:17,01. Coaki snlonai SdSit VcNk0,11rD VIOn3ve1 lo3raed ...%—aawkleMararar ea.rens u r lar Vd 14 0130Vd NOLIV31 dt, Ohl NNYld 1. TRASH ENCLOSUR WM= VMDIPMIYINVOINMODWAMIM11,9117,MAIMIU179/1.11111TPROMFPNR,,,,,„........... . "l111.V.M.el.144 USXVVIIS •rv. loviNcto svvirseos6Hd 059X Y3 Viillaariel, V Runs "moo Nat 000101 WOO Ntrld 3,3VOSONVI 1Vrilc3DNOD Y3 Vif 030131 " 3 311V3C W/OCAIW1O&BM/CO MS ATRIA V1133ei O 21143.0 W.V. PTV 1041,. • 1,,,,441.)••••••-..— 0 O 0w 4C W • z 4* - Z Z W < ) "' CC W • CCO <:r W C° .. ...... . ...... . . .. . j' speszerce ...E.1 Nv-L,E, 23.,:,'-.S.C,,,ErE-E '3"tr3i4DONCE.E.) 1 CE -1-5 v::--- •IE,EirraaV4! 1 '•* V-,01 Ei ams 'o,....::: aE.EJ mzt,1 E::.,:* -7-3 Trrot.:‘, aw sr-roDN 7!•0 4.L.W600 M-4.. DOA.LOIE ,G'TIVILk n1*l 4'3 EaLtiK WEE \E9E3i 9. Es! '3\e3i-1 , ! ! 3•3 a Il E . Q ... 1 • ,7,, • ... • ... • _79 - • - - ST/1,8•54.'S'ict i-/ 4 / N,..-',13SC!11Vell.dSONCY:_, 053Z.E. ',..."0 ',...1(10;l1 i \',3 'V -1/.-3,76.T1 f-4-4---"---i----4.-- v ans 'ocak ow mz,1 kiE/7100 ;7/VD <INV SV-K-ef.-./N dO ;&DO et.F. 3OAt3l A.UTIVA V113 -3/a_ 14112D affir13 I !.,1 , , 1 1 • • ij HJ •11,14.0. q.111f0i5/. -4.11W614K , Eri>fri-tS. rk, ..i.a\-+.0,01 ss-r-E-szeiSe, H.d, rJvid 9..a.,,,ZaW,,,,IV-11VC11:733°K.2".) 05.qZ6 v:vin -D4ral.] ..., V ..„13.7:5 'oJTJ-,N 0& r....zp] l'eri:03 2-riv3-Ctaa, 5,11.0:N Fa.,.....n1,,,la 00,k.li ;,..7.11VAnr€030.,..-LEaa.-, i • 1 Iii L__1 '..•:'A / IA J1: .43" 73 • • • . • • 531,041..C19.6 H.d R Be:OS:INV-1 wudDQZ C6..c•Zevo LTTIVO E.SNEC-3 00A101, A211VA ni10.1. 4.D 1,2i.N9D 1 • f, I C?,L2 L z Ej-, ELE ::. c. EE'E• EE,EE•E ,,,E.E.E•Ei: E;E-E -E-E -.. ,EEEEEEE.- -- E ----E "kE ,E.EEE,tE -E' PE. E`EiEE'E •E„..E. •EEEE.-E- ',E4TEE: ;•EE EE ,. ..EEE EEEEE-EE- XEEEEEEE•E-E E, • ; \ , I 1 — 06;Zti V;) V1132/G1. VO VT? EITC- 00.A.La ,01-1VA afivisi ..i.::•VJJ=i g9t13-5-!..C1S4: H4 1,,,,r,-1...-_:.yoso!...^di -iVilidg•ONOre [.;•.] v Birrs '023N G -E n2.,,-..,i-r.,-.7;ow SVIC01.4O 444:44: ff.S 00/L.L0 LLTTIVA rInDaa. 4 t -B.1.03 Wftria A lin w • . -4 ▪ 4 ,•,-4`e2 ro,r, tR‹ •e• •••: e.-••• : .................,... &EY:CPS CV lacel.NO3 SCTSS4E'VS6 1-181 Nt."1.AOSJ LLr3r) 1 1- 05SZtv,.VITIOF.K.7-11. 1O ONvs-v-oa\ErC OTTVA kr1113362.1.7.0 H2.11,23 3iErS I 1 ' : I r 01, p".. 'EE r. ,.,.;. •,(..:;.. c,- :.r .E...,, EL:,-,... E: -;':'., f.' .'..). Y.. ,'. !"' i'P', ..,;': i-, ", ,'...• 0 V vi• q . , E‘...- , ii,.. =.;•, a . " 4 • u.• 4.• 44.• •• , ti • It. MULLM.U. lllll 1-r. 64 ' Y.1-1'N',1-ri ;yr' -10VINOD i 06gLE 'td1r103A-' ; L -18'13D '....-11E3 UNE S'VlOaNOOCAn I ! 00A1011 vincsnat. taLN;o onro I •••••2,:r 1-1" 7 ry I LU ; - c •.,.. 't.i,? •7•-•.-. j,..-.,,-,.....- ,......-.1. -,:•::-."1::_::-..::- ' '• ('' i .---... \ --. i , ,--- v.- < .,„ •tgl.„[,]..,',1,2,1\[[" ,-. , , .-. , ''''''{,;‘,'";.3%k,-,,'''''' '', ''''• -=1,- ,.-' -. I ,"" "i:.... Ip.,,a`z ,:.:-. s 41.t--- .2, ....4, , ., ..... - , ,---.t.:. -.1.:. '.. .• 1 ai ...E 73 i IQ ' 1 i 1 ''.•.,q.•;=, ••• - ' .;;'1.;* ., '`E' '": 0 rE 0 1 r'' ,, •.R. E-------- 0 q . .. 1:. .,... t ' 7 .• .,- (.....-..: . . ----- \ r....... -...._.3 .., :,, ,,,,,, 000000 '''....'"- '''.• , s - 7..'.$ .. '4 ' g, : ;• : 3. 1,, :/: 1.• .,-E. ..,.'.. OS L ," 0 ' D I TREE ON SLOFE P I , ,-. . 1. r, r, T •,/.. :•. ...,.:.:,?, .,•„ ., .:•,..,,, ...-.,..-,.,...., :, ....••••2- ,• —t-. , ..... , 'e" , V,..1. .... ,.., •.•-.,_, ' f. ,...„ - 1 ..-, 1 I IY I inni : LE. fy...7 .-4 al 0 t)..' Lti . 10 j \ .. I / .00.:0000000 •-•:":;,&.,1- , . ..' 0 '''' L., w ,-:j,, SI--IUE3 PLANTING ,,, 0 0 0..• * 0 * 0 1) 0 0 0 LC AN.............. IGROUNIDCC.',VER PLANTING: . —... 1...., ..,..-.;'/...., 7-------:\ i::';:,-"- .,, J • ''''. - .i ' ' ' ' ' ' ' j '• 1-:., 3 .., , 0P -...,. .7?: i . .1- I I JUTE MESH 51'4E311_1=R _I --) 1 v i'y ggvSSZCig6 Hd! 1-!,!!v-,4 OG.r...T.:1.,1 ID "7 -1,71.: -..rel 1 t ---t----1.---, :.wrrs -.c..ci-",: c.... nzt: r- 1,,,n0=.) TT -NO Wr' SV1.0DN :-.,/,` 03A101 )3TIVA V113.3VE. 1 iPi 1 r . 1 (0 z 13NNV -O 28751 Rancho California Rd. SUITE 208 Temecula, CA. 92590 (951)506-2800 (951)506-3988 fox AXIS ARCHITECTURE, INC STEPHEN C. SIGLER A.I.A. LIC. NO. C 19090 stephen®oxls3orchitecture.net Date: November 1, 2010 To: City of Temecula, Planning Department Subject: Regarding: ICTV Community Center Facility Located at Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Road City of Temecula Plot Plan Approval, PA 08-0242 "Statement of Operations", revised 11.1.10 The following is the proposed facility operations: The facility is approximately 24,943 gross sq. ft., two story structure for religious and community functions that are being planned and constructed in two separate phases. Phase One, one story, 4,157 s.f. community center Parking required for this phase is 91 spaces. Total parking provided is 104 spaces. Phase Two is a two-story Mosque and community center. Main level is 12,481 s.f., and the second floor is 8,305 for a total of 20, 786 gross square feet. Parking required for Phase Two is 98 spaces. The total parking for both phases is 181 spaces. Outdoor Activities: The only outdoor activity related to our normal operation of the facility will be related to the children's playground. Adequate parking, landscaping, open space, play area and driveways have been included to enhance the overall design and function. 28751 Rancho Collfornlo R. SUITE 208 Temaculo. CA. 92590 (951)506-2800 (951)506-3988 fox AXIS ARCHITECTURE, INC STEPHEN C. SIGLER A.I.A. LIC. N. C 19090 staphan®oxls3orchltacture. net a.) Hours of operation: Phase One Facility; Monday thru Thursday, 5:30 thru 6:00 am, and 8:30 thru 9:15 pm. Friday services from 12:15 thru 2:45 pm., and 7:00 thru 10:00 pm. Saturday services, last week of the month, from 7pm —1 Opm. Sunday School services program from 9 am —1 pm. Phase Two Facility, Monday thru Thursday, 5:30 thru 6:00 am, and 8:30 thru 9:15 pm. Friday services from 12:15 thru 2:45 pm., and 7:00 thru 10:00 pm. Saturday services, last week of the month, from 7pm — 1 Opm. Sunday School services program from 9 am —1 pm. b.) Number of employees: Phase One and Phase Two; one employee, Pastor/Imam. One religious leader, Pastor/Imam will be compensated on the basis of a service contract. c.) Required parking for this facility is 91 spaces for phase one. The phase one sanctuary will cease to be utilized as a sanctuary after construction of phase two. 98 spaces are required for phase two of the project. A total of 181 spaces, including 7 motorcycle spaces, will provided at the completion of phase 2. d.) Average daily peak trips anticipated is sixty five (65). e.) Equipment anticipated use: none f.) Hazardous material: none 28751 Rancho Collfornlo Rd. SUITE 208 Tamocula. CA. 92590 (951)506-2800 (951)506-3988 fox AXIS ARCHITECTURE, INC STEPHEN C. SIGLER A.I.A. LIC. NO. C 19090 stephsn®oxls3orchltactura.nat g.) The exterior spires or minarets at the roof area are for design purposes only and at no time during phase one or two will there be any audible prayer calls or outdoor public announcements. h.) The proposed use is a Mosque and community center. PC RESOLUTION NO. 10 - PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA08-0241 AND PA08- 0242, A TWO-PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TWO-STORY, 24,943 SQUARE FOOT RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 4.32 ACRES WITHIN A VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE COLIBRI (APN 957-140-012) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 14, 2008, Stephen Sigler, Axis 3 Architecture, on behalf of owner, Islamic Center of Temecula Valley filed Planning Application No. PA08-0241, a Development Plan, and Planning Application No. PA08-0242, a Conditional Use Permit Application. Both applications were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on December 1, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241and PA08-0242 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Section 17.05.010.F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed use as a compatible use within residential areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; As conditioned, the project has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the Initial Study process to further ensure that the project has been designed and appropriately conditioned so that it will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E) C. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; The proposed religious facility is located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. Religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in VL zones. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed use is for a religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. According to the City of Temecula Development Code, these types of uses are allowed in all residential districts upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Custom single-family homes surround the project on all sides with the exception of the east side. An existing religious facility lies to the east of the proposed project. As designed and conditioned, the project will not adversely affect adjacent uses, buildings or structures. E. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; As designed and conditioned the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features required in the City of Temecula Development Code have been satisfied. As a result, the project will integrate into the surrounding area in much the same way as the immediately adjacent existing religious facility. F. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The project is a religious facility to be located in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. Religious facilities are a permitted use in VL zones with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which contains provisions to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. G. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for the Conditional Use Permit will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone, located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit as described in the Initial Study for the project. Based upon the findings contained in that study, it was determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on May 28, 2010, and expired on June 26, 2010. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. C. Two written comments on the initial study were received prior to the public hearing and responses to the comments were prepared. The responses have been submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the December 1, 2010 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the mitigation measures required by the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Comm ission. E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 1st day of December 2010. Carl Carey, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of December 2010, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application Nos.: PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 Project Description: A two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Assessor's Parcel No.: 957-140-012 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: N/A (Non -Profit 501c — Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.06.030.B) TUMF Category: Exempt (House of Worship — Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.08.040. F.9) Approval Date: December 1, 2010 Expiration Date: December 1, 2012 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Seventy -Four Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($2,074.25) which includes the Two Thousand Ten Dollar and Twenty -Five Cent ($2,010.25) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty -Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Mitigated Negative Declaration. PL -7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL -8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -10. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -11. The applicant shall paint a three-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL -12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Exterior Stucco Roof Tile Metal Roof Wall Mosaic Aspen (La Habra 1/2x23) Silverado (La Habra x820) Mesa Verde (La Habra x)(215) San Ramon Blend (M.C.A. Clay Tile Roofing) Cool Copper Penny (DuraTech 5000 & Zincalume) Chestnut (Jasba-Toscana: 0536/IV) Slate (Jasba-Toscana: 0537/IV), Atlantic (Jasba-Toscana: 0533/IV) PL -14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL -15. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross -lot access and parking across all lots. PL -16. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Planning Director. PL -17. The applicant shall comply with all operational characteristics included in their Statement of Operations dated November 1, 2010, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -18. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -19. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in - lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -20. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. PL -21. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -22. The developer shall contact the maintenance superintendent for a pre -design meeting to discuss design perimeters and obtain Temecula Community Services District Landscape Standards. The median landscape plans submitted for consideration for TCSD maintenance shall be in conformance with the TCSD Landscape Standards. PL -23. Construction of the landscaped median shall commence pursuant to a pre -construction meeting with the developer, TCSD maintenance superintendent, Building and Safety inspector and Public Works inspector. Developer shall comply with City and TCSD review and inspection processes. PL -24. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped median until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD or other responsible party. PL -25. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL -26. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, landscaping, walls, fencing, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -27. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -28. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL -29. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -30. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL -31. The following shall be included in the Notes section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation." PL -32. The following shall be included in the Notes section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." PL -33. The following shall be included in the Notes section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified Paleontologist shall be on-site during grading activities." PL -34. The following shall be included in the Notes section of the Grading Plan: "Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer." PL -35. The following shall be included in the Notes section of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." PL -36. The following shall be included in the Notes section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." PL -37. The following shall be included in the Notes section of the Grading Plan: "A 30 -day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30 -day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works." PL -38. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30 -day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL -39. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -40. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lotto the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL -41. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL -42. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -43. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL -44. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi fora minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -45. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -46. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance) and the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -47. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -48. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -49. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL -50. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -51. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL -52. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -53. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL -54. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. PL -55. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the advanced energy fees. PL -56. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL -57. The landscape construction drawings for the landscaped median shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services. PL -58. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to install the landscaped median. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -59. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL -60. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL -61. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -62. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -63. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." PL -64. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL -65. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL -66. The developer shall design and construct or provide an in lieu of construction fee for half width raised landscape median on Nicolas Road (Major Arterial Highway Standards -100' R/W) along property frontage. PL -67. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -68. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated November 3, 2008, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. PL -69. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 14, 2008, a copy of which is attached. PL -70. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated October 28, 2008, a copy of which is attached. PL -71. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 5, 2008, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code in place at the time of building permit application submittal. B-2. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B-3. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B-4. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B-5. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. B-6. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-7. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-8. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-9. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance Number 94-21, specifically Section G(1) of Riverside County Ordinance Number 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays. B-10. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance, subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Prior to Submitting for Plan Review B-11. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. At Plan Review Submittal B-12. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B-13. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of the California Plumbing Code in place at the time of building permit application submittal. B-14. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B-15. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-16. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-17. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a looped water system, with two points of connection, capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R). F-3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on-site and off site 6" x 4" x 2-2 %2" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system. Additional hydrants may be required to meet spacing requirements to provide hydrant protection for entire site, including parking lots, than what is proposed on development plan (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R) F-4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or site that is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on-site fire hydrants are required (CFC Chapter 5, Section 508.5). F-5. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.4) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-6. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Paved access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-7. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-8. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.7. and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-9. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.1.2). F-10. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-11. Fire Department turn around requirements are 45 feet outside and 37 feet inside. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-12. The developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being metforthe on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14, Section 1412 and Chapter 5, Section 501.3). F-13. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F-14. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-15. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) per City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E. F-16. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6- inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-17. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). F-18. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). F-19. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.3). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD -2. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. PD -3. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD -4. All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting Ordinance, California Government Code 8565. PD -5. All exterior lighting to be in compliance with Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 665 requiring low pressure sodium lighting. PD -6. All exterior doors to have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above each door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD -7. All building mounted exterior night lighting shall be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. PD -8. Applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non -business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non- business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1000 in accordance with Section 8565 of the California Government Code. PD -9. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD -10. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. PD -11. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. PD -12. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". PD -13. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well - lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD -14. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD -15. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department. PD -16. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Design the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Design space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -2. The project is proposed to be developed in two phases. a. Phase 1 consists of a 4,157 square feet building and the southerly parking lot. b. Phase 2 consists of a 20,786 square feet building and the northerly parking lot. PW -3. A Grading Permit, for rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained street right-of-way. PW -4. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW -5. All grading and improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -6. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post -construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non -permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. PW -7. Prior to any plan checks submittals, the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be conceptually accepted by the City. The WQMP shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and include infiltration -based best management practices, (BMPs), source control requirements, and treatment mechanisms. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -8. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Department of Fish and Game b. Army Corps of Engineers c. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District e. Department of Public Works, and other affected agencies PW -9. A copy of the grading, and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. PW -10. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PW -11. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW -12. For Phase 1, the Developer shall submit for approval: a. A grading plan to include an onsite water quality retention basin, designed in accordance with the CASQA BMP Handbook for New Development, within the proposed parking lot of Phase 2. The basin shall accommodate the 100 -year storm event/runoff from tributary areas. b. A finalized WQMP that includes additional text, exhibits, layouts, details, sections, calculations, and appendices for the retention basin and as necessary to clearly identify the structural treatment controls corresponding to each phase of the project. c. A street and drainage improvement plan for Calle Colibri, from northerly driveway to the southerly terminus of the cul-de-sac, (General Local Street Standard No. 104-60' R/VV) to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW -13. For Phase 2, the Developer shall submit for approval: a. The site is not mapped and its zoning is not identified in the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The Developer shall obtain and submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The 100 -year water surface elevation of Santa Gertrudis Channel shall be ascertained and the centerline profile of Nicolas Road shall be established. b. A grading plan to include the remainder of the onsite improvements. c. Prior to the approval of any plans, the developer shall comply with Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code. d. A street and drainage improvement plan for Calle Colibri, from the northerly driveway to Nicolas Road, (General Local Street Standard No. 104-60' R/W) to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). e. A street and drainage improvement plan for Nicolas Road, from westerly property boundary to Calle Colibiri,(Major Arterial (4 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 101-100' R/W) to include installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlight, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) including pavement transition per Caltrans' standards. Project shall restripe the eastbound approach on Nicolas Road to include a two-way left turn lane. ii. The developer shall design and construct or provide an in lieu of construction fee for half width raised landscape median on Nicolas Road (Major Arterial Highway Standards -100' R/W) along property frontage. PW -14. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. PW -15. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW -16. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction. PW -17. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of 100 years. PW -18. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW -19. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW -20. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW -21. The Developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. PW -22. The developer shall obtain grading and drainage easements for any work performed on adjoining properties. The easements shall be in format as approved by the Department of Public Works. PW -23. Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum overA.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 207A. c. Streetlight shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 800. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number. 400. e. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. f. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. g. All cul-de-sac shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Number 600. h. Public street improvement plans shall include plans and profiles showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. i. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed underground. j. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. PW -24. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. PW -25. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public VVorks for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW -26. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -27. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. PW -28. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW -29. For Phase 1, the developer shall construct: a. Calle Colibri from the northerly driveway to the southerly terminus of the cul-de-sac to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW -30. For Phase 2, the developer shall construct: a. Calle Colibri from Nicolas Road to the northerly drive approach to include installation of half -width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Nicolas Road, from westerly property boundary to Calle Colibiri, to include installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlight, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) including pavement transition per Caltrans' standards. PW -31. Corner property line cut off shall be required per City of Temecula Standard No. 603A. PW -32. The project shall demonstrate the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW -33. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW -34. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -35. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -36. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager -Chief Engineer City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CaalLir lliifornia 9258 -9033 Attention: t CJ Vin CIV 1995 T STREET E, CA 92501 51.955.1200 1.788.9965 rcflood.org I80_7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD C AND WATER CONSERVATION D Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: 12PD— ON 2. /1X14 Y I)o8 - o 2 L ) The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in anyway constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public healh and safety or any other such issue: No comment. This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities: The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. sva Thisproject is located within the limits of the District's MU'�r\2;v1 CX.2Q1 Ytt�,lit}IArea Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be aid y cashier's chheck or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities. For further information, contact the District's encroachment permit section at 951.955.1266. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other finalapprovalshould not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, c: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: David Mares G -4 ALE V. ANDERSON Senior Civil Engineer Date: 1l (3/ 0e,' C��IVTY OF RIVERSIDE •COMA �NITY HEALTH AGENCY L��� DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH City of Temecula Planning Department c/o Eric Jones PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 14 November 2008 RE: PA08-0241 and 0242 a Nov 1 NOV8 :' 3 The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA08- 0241 and 0242 for the Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24,943 square foot Islamic Community Center to operate with a VL zone in the City limits of Temecula under applicant: Stephen C. Singler. The CUP is required per the Conditions of Approval to have presented to the Planning Department of the City of Temecula, will serve letters from the purveyors of piped water (Rancho California Water District) and Sanitary Sewer (Eastern Municipal Water District.) The community center will be located at Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Roads. (APN 957-140-007) Any future food facility or food sales to the public, the applicant shall contact this Department at 951.461.0284 for food plan check compliance by the County of Riverside DEH. If your have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.955.8980 Sincerely, Gregor Dellenbach, REHS EHS081535 ($136.00) Land Use and Water Engineering • 39493 Los Alamos Road, Murrieta, CA 92562 • (951) 600-6180 • FAX (951) 600-6181 Board of Directors President David J. Slawson Vice President Ronald W. Sullivan Treasurer Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Randy A. Record Philip E. Paule Board Secretary Rosemarie V. Howell General Manager Anthony J. Pack Director of the Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif. Randy A. Record Legal Counsel Redwine and Sherrill EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT October 28, 2008 City of Temecula Planning Department PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attn. Eric Jones SINCE 1950 E©ElVE OCT 3 1 2008 The City of Temecula has requested EMWD to review and comment on APN 967- 140-007 & 957-140-011 EMWD requires beginning dialogue with the applicant at or before the tentative phase of a project, in order to assess the infrastructure needs. Accordingly, we offer to meet with developers/engineers for one initial due -diligence meeting, without requiring a deposit. This meeting is to review your project and determine potential service from EMWD. The objective is to provide a forum to resolve any questions about our development process and help to determine if there are any potential issues that may exist in the area concerning EMWD facilities (water, sewer or recycled water). No improvement plans will be accepted until this pre -project phase is completed and an EMWD Plan of Service has been approved. In an ongoing effort to develop a dependable and reliable water supply for its customers, EMWD's goal is to maximize the use of recycled water, for landscape demands. All projects that include landscaped areas are carefully considered for recycled water use. This process needs to begin early to avoid unnecessary delays. In order to set up a Due Diligence meeting we need: 1- A completed Due Diligence questionnaire. 2- Your proposed agenda for the due -diligence meeting 3- Location Map 4- Proposed development plan layout if available (hard copy and JPEG format) I encourage developers/engineers to become familiar with EMWD New Development processes, while designing your project. They have been developed over many years and serve a great importance as they can prevent complications and save time. More information can be found at http://www.emwd.org/new_biz/new-biz-dev.html If at any point in time there are questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. If I can not help, I will get you to someone who can. Sincerel Linda H. Petersen Development Coordinator ex. 4310 Petersel@emwd.org MailingAddresscC: Posf 61'fiskttltox 8300 Perris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (951) 928-3777 Fax: (951) 928-6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet: www.emwd.org Gaucho 9PaYu Board of Directors William E. Plummer President Ralph H. Daily Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ben R. Drake Lisa D. Herman John E. Hoagland Lawrence M. Libeu Officers: Matthew G. Stone General Manager Phillip L. Forbes, CPA Assistant General Manager/ Chief Financial Officer Perry R. Louck Director of Planning Andrew L. Webster, P.E. Acting District Engineer Jeffrey D. Armstrong Controller Kelli E. Garcia District Secretary C. Michael Cowett Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel November 5, 2008 Eric Jones, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY ISLAMIC CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOTS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15421 APN 957-140-007 AND APN 957-140-011 [S. SIGLER] Dear Mr. Jones: Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The subject project/property fronts an existing 8 -inch diameter water pipeline (1610 Service Pressure Zone) within Calle Colibri. Please note that the existing 8 -inch water pipeline within Calle Colibri is programmed to be converted to the 1485 Service Pressure Zone. Water service to the subject project/property does not currently exist. Additions or modifications to water/sewer service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner, including payment of all applicable special assessments. Where private (on-site) facilities are required for water service, fire protection, irrigation, or other purposes, RCWD requires recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for such on-site private facilities, where private on-site water facilities may cross (or may be shared amongst) multiple lots/project units, and/or where such "common" facilities may be owned and maintained by a common Property Owners Association or agent (proposed now or in the future). Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) destroying all on-site wells and signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon water supply shortage contingency measures, pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan. As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for water service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. 08\CW:at091\F450\FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 www ranrhnwatrr .nm Eric Jones/City of Temecula November 5, 2008 Page Two Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be Water District. If you should have any questions or need additional information, Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Corey F. Wallace Engineering Manager cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor S. Sigler, Axis 3 Architecture 0 8\C W : at091 \F45 0\FEG provided by Eastern Municipal please contact an Engineering Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 www.ranchowater.com City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Islamic Center of Temecula Valley (ICTV) Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Eric Jones, Case Planner (951)506-5115 Project Location Generally located on the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Project Sponsor's Name and Address Stephen Sigler, Axis 3 Architecture General Plan Designation Very Low Residential (VL) Zoning Very Low Residential (VL) Description of Project A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Exception for Height (PA08-0241, PA08-0242 and PA09-0154) for a two-story, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located on a 4.32 acre parcel (APN 957-140-012). The project will be constructed in two phases consisting of 4,157 square feet in the first phase and 20,786 square feet in the second phase. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The project is proposed to be located on a vacant 4.32 acre parcel in the Very Low (VL) residential district within the City of Temecula. The immediately surrounding parcels abutting the site to the west and south are also zoned Very Low residential. Nicolas Road and Calle Colibir boarder the property to the north and east respectively. Parcels zoned Very Low (VL) residential exist beyond these roads. The adjacent residentially zoned parcels each contain existing dwellings with the exception of the parcel located to the east. This parcel contains a religious facility. Other public agencies whose approval is required Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) G:IPIANNINGI2008IPA08-0241 Islamic Center DPIPIanning\Initial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Aesthetics X Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population and Housing Biological Resources Public Services Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Utilities and Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydroio_gy and Water Quality None Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Eric Jones Printed Name 2 S- /0 Date City of Temecula For I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. nothing further is required_ Eric Jones Printed Name 2 S- /0 Date City of Temecula For 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact: No impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: 1.a. No Impact: The project will have no impact on a scenic vista. The proposed two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility is located on the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. The Community Design Element of the City of Temecula's General Plan identifies important scenic viewsheds throughout the City to ensure all new public and private development projects will not obstruct the public views of scenic resources. According to the Community Design Plan Exhibit on page CD -5 of the Temecula General Plan, the subject property has not been identified as a viewshed, nor is the project located in close proximity to an identified viewshed. Therefore, no scenic vistas or identified viewsheds will be affected by the development of the proposed project. 1.b. No Impact: The proposed project will not substantially damage scenic resources including trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. The proposed project site does not contain any scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings or historical buildings. Furthermore, the proposed project is not located near a State scenic highway. 1.c. Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or quality of its surroundings. The 4.32 acre project site is currently vacant. However, the project .site is surrounded by single-family homes and an existing religious facility on Very Low residential zoned parcels. 1.d. Less than Significant Impact: The project will create a new source of light glare; however, the impact is not anticipated to be significant .enough to adversely impact the daytime or nighttime views in the area. The proposed site is surrounded by parcels with residential development. The City of Temecula requires that all new developments comply with the Mount Palomar Light Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires that all lighting sources be shielded and directed downward to avoid glare on adjacent properties and ensure low levels of glare in the sky. Lighting design will be addressed during the plan check process, prior to the. issuance of any building permits for the new religious facility. Lighting issues will also be addressed during the construction and inspection phase of the project. Because the project will be required to be in compliance with Ordinance 655, it will not adversely affect the day or nighttime views or create substantial light or glare, resulting in a less than significant impact. G_IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DPIPlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the CaliforniaDepartment of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation: incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? X d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? X Comments: 2.a.e. No Impact: The proposed project will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, to a non-agricultural use. According to the. City of Temecula General Plan, the project site does not contain any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide importance. Therefore, the construction and operation of the project will not have any impacts to these types of farmland. Many of the adjacent properties contain existing single-family dwellings and are not used for forest or farmland. Additionally, the project site does not contain existing farmland, or forestland, nor was the site intended to be used for agricultural or foresting purposes. 2.b. No Impact: The project site is zoned Very Low (VL) residential. This zoning designation does allow for agricultural uses provided they are consistent with all. Development Code requirements. However, agricultural uses are not planned for this property. In addition, the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract per the General Plan. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\Planninglinitial StudylRevised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.cdoc 2.c.d. No Impact: The project location is not suitable for forest and/or timberland uses as defined by the Public Resources and Government Codes. Forest land is defined as land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation and other public benefits. The proposed project site is zoned Very Low (VL) residential and not as a Timberland Production Zone as defined by Section 51104(g) of the Government Code. As such, the parcel and surrounding area are intended to be developed with detached single-family homes and are therefore not available to grow trees commercially as required by the timberland definition contained in Section 4526 of the Public Resources Code. In addition, forest land does not exist on the parcel or in the immediate area. No impact is expected. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PIanninglInitial StudylRevised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 3. AiR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact` a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: 3.a. No Impact: The proposed religious facility is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are the responsible agencies for preparing the Air Quality Management Plan for the SCAB. The proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The proposed project is subject to the requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and SCAQMD. A project is deemed inconsistent with air quality plans if it results in population, and/or employment growth that exceed growth estimates in the applicable air quality plan. The proposed project does not include any residential development, housing, or large local or regional employment centers and would not result in significant population or employment growth. Thus, the proposed project would result in no impact with respect to the implementation of the SCAQMD's AQMP. 3.b.d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: Air quality impacts may occur during site preparation, grading, and construction activities required for implementation of the proposed land use. Major sources of emissions during construction include exhaust emissions generated during site preparation, grading, and the subsequent construction of the structures, as well as fugitive dust generated as a result of soil and material disturbance during site preparation and grading excavation activities. The emission of reactive organic compounds during site paving and painting of the structures may also occur. Sensitive receptors are land uses such as residences, schools, daycare centers, medical and recreational facilities that are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than are the general population. The nearest sensitive receptors are the adjacent residential properties. These adjacent uses are located more than 25 meters from the proposed project site. Short term construction related air quality impacts are expected to occur during the development of the site. These short term impacts may be generated by soil disturbances and equipment exhaust. With the prevailing west to east winds, several residential units will be downwind of on-site construction activities. Any potential air quality impact during construction can be minimized by the combination of mandatory control programs. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures outlined below and a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project with mitigation. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PianninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial.Study.doc Required Mitigation Construction Practices • Use of Best Available Control Measures pursuant to Air Quality Management District guidelines for PM10 and for diesel equipment exhaust and during all grading activities. • Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. • Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. • Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. • Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. • Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. • Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. • Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for than 96 hours after clearing is completed. • Ensure that all cut and fill slopes are permanently protected from erosion. • Require the construction contractor to ensure that all construction equipment is maintained in peak working order. • Limit allowable idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. • Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. • Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. • Wash or sweep access points daily. • Sandbag construction sites for erosion control. With the required mitigation measures specified above, no SCAQMD emission threshold will be exceeded during construction or operation of the proposed project. Thus, the air quality impacts from the development under this mitigation scenario are anticipated to be less than significant. 3.c. Less than Significant Impact: CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 (h)(3) stipulates that for an impact involving a resource that is addressed by an approved plan or mitigation program, the lead agency may determine that a project's incremental contribution is not cumulatively considerable if the project complies with the adopted plan or program. In addressing cumulative effects for air quality, the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan is the most appropriate document to use because it set forth comprehensive programs that will lead the South Coast Air Basin, including the project area, into compliance with all federal and state air quality standards. It also utilizes control measures and related emission reduction estimates based upon emissions projections for a future development scenario derived from land use, population, and employment characteristics defined in consultation with local governments. Because the proposed project is in G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial StudyCEQA Initial Study.doc conformance with the AQMP and the project is not significant on an individual basis, it is appropriate to conclude that the project's incremental contribution to criteria pollutant emissions is not cumulatively considerable. Therefore the project's incremental contribution to criteria pollutant emissions is not anticipated to result in a cumulatively considerable increase, and a Tess than significant impact is anticipated. 3.e. No Impact: During construction the proposed project will include operations that will produce odors associated with equipment and materials. The site is located within the vicinity of sensitive receptors, including single-family homes. However, the odors associated with this type project are normally not considered so offensive as to cause sensitive receptors to become adversely affected. Diesel fuel combustion odors from construction equipment, operation equipment, and new asphalt paving fall into this category. Both based on the short-term of the emissions and the characteristics of these emissions, no significant odor impacts are anticipated to result from implementing the proposed project. G:IPLANNING120081PA48-0241 Islamic Center DP 1PIanninglinitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant : .Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with . the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a.d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: Based upon existing conditions, the proposed project is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on the wildlife movements in the surrounding area within established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Further, the project site is not located, within a Criteria Cell of the MSHCP Plan Area. Therefore, no MSHCP HANS review is required. The Western Burrowing Owl was identified as possibly present on or in the vicinity of the proposed project. However, suitable habitat for this species is not present on the proposed project site and Burrowing Owls or signs of Burrowing Owls were not observed on the site during a study performed by PCR Services Corporation (PCR). Thus, a less than significant impact for the project is expected with mitigation. Required Mitigation The following actions shall be taken to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive biological resources: A 30 -day Burrowing Owl Pre -construction Survey shall be conducted prior to any ground disturbing activity. If burrowing owls are found on the site, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall be consulted regarding relocation of the owls. Relocation may only occur during the non -breeding season. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1Planningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA initial Study.doc Alternatively, pre -construction surveys may be conducted at five-day intervals until three consecutive surveys fail to find owls on the site. 4.b. No Impact: Riparian/Riverine areas are lands which contain habitat dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent vegetation, or emergent mosses and lichens, which occur close to, or which depend upon, soil moisture from a nearby fresh water source; or areas with fresh water flow during all or a portion of the year. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, no portion of the project site is located in a riparian biological area (Sensitive Habitats — Figure 5-3). No impact is anticipated. 4.c. No impact: The project site does not contain federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. To be considered a wetland, a site must meet three criteria: hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. Hydric soils are defined by the national Technical Committee as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the grow season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil. Wetland hydrology is present when, under normal circumstances, the land surface is either inundated or the upper portion of the soil is saturated at a sufficient frequency and duration to create anaerobic conditions. These conditions are also required in order for hydrophytic vegetation to be present. There is no indication that soils on the project site are inundated or saturated long enough during the growing season to promote hydric conditions or hydrophytic vegetation. Based on the absence of hydric soils, wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation, there are no wetlands present on the project site. No impact will occur. 4.e. No Impact: The construction and development of the project will not conflict with any local ordinances or policies as they relate to the protection of biological resources. The City of Temecula has recently adopted a Heritage Tree Ordinance designed to protect certain species of trees within the City. However, no trees designated in the ordinance where located on the subject property. The City of Temecula General Plan outlines a number of policies which emphasize the interrelationship between the built and natural environment. The General Pian recognizes the importance of conserving important biological habitat and protecting plant and animal species of concern. As a result, the General Plan requires that development proposals identify significant biological resources. The Biological Assessment that was completed for the proposed project site did not identify any sensitive plant species, sensitive bird species, sensitive mammal species, sensitive reptile or amphibian species on site. Additionally, a Burrowing Owl survey was completed to identify any potential habitat which would assess the likelihood that Burrowing Owls would utilize the property. No Burrowing Owls were found on-site. No impact will occur. 4.f. No Impact: The proposed development of the project will not conflict with the provisions of the Multi - Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The MSHCP is a comprehensive, multi jurisdictional plan which focuses on the conservation of 146 species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County_ The Plan's overall goal is to maintain a biological and ecological diversity within the rapidly urbanizing area. The Plan Area encompasses approximately 1.26 million acres and includes the City of Temecula within its boundaries. In considering the development of this site in the context of the MSHCP, it has been determined that the project site is not located within MSHCP Criteria Cells (Southwest Area Plan - Subunit 1 Murrieta Creek). Since the project does not lie within a designated Criteria Cell, it is not required to undergo a Habitat Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) and Joint Project Review application. No impact will occur. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center IDPIPIanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\GEQA Initial Study.doc 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant ' Impact Less Thar}, :. Significant With Mitigation Incorporated ':: Less Than Significant Impact No impact`: a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a.b.c.d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: "Historic Resources" as defined by CEQA Section 15064.5 are prehistoric and historic resources that are assessed as being "significant", insofar as their evidentiary contents can be demonstrated relevant to the established local, regional or national research domains, issues and questions. According to a Cultural Resource Assessment that was completed for the property on January 20, 2010 by Michael Brandon and Associates, a cultural resources records check conducted at the Eastern Information Center was conducted. A pedestrian field investigation was also completed by using the transect survey technique across the study area. Surface visibility was excellent at 100%. The survey results indicate that one isolated artifact is located within the project area. This artifact (catalogued P#33-17881) consists of a quartzite flake and was likely deposited on the property during the prehistoric era. All topsoil's on the property are disturbed down to the bottom of the disking horizon, which is up to three feet below the modern ground surface. Impacts to potentially significant cultural resources are considered moderate. This because other resources do occur in the area, and it is entirely possible that significant subsurface prehistoric resources will be uncovered during development related earthmoving. If buried prehistoric cultural resources are detected during monitoring, the resources must be evaluated for significance before earthmoving can continue in the area of the find. The following mitigation measures will be required: Required Mitigation • A qualified Paleontologist shall be on-site during grading activities. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified Archaeologist shall be retained to initiate and supervise cultural resource mitigation monitoring during project -related earthmoving in all areas of the project. Project -related archaeological monitoring shall include the following constraints: o All construction -related earthmoving shall be monitored by the qualified Archaeologist or his/her designated representative. o Once 50% of the earth to be moved has been examined by the qualified Archaeologist, the qualified Archaeologist may, at his or her discretion, terminate monitoring if and only no buried cultural resources have been detected. If buried cultural resources are detected during monitoring, monitoring must continue until 100% of virgin earth within the study area has been disturbed and inspected by the qualified Archaeologist or his or her designated representative. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1Planningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study_doc o Grading shall cease in the area of a cultural artifact or potential cultural artifact as delineated by the qualified Archaeologist or his/her designated representative. Grading should only continue in other areas of the site while particular finds are investigated. o If cultural artifacts are uncovered during grading, they shall be examined by a professional archaeologist are subject to MM CR -3, and then curated in a museum facility chosen by the County. A mitigation -monitoring report must accompany the artifacts once they are donated to the museum facility. Given the project's Iodation in Pechanga territory, the Pechanga Tribe intends to assert its rights pursuant to California Law with regard to any remains or items discovered in the course of this project. Furthermore, the Pechanga Band of Indians requests the following mitigation measures: • According to the California Public Resources Code, 5097.98, if Native American human remains are discovered, the Native American Heritage Commission must name a "most likely descendant" who shall be consulted as to the appropriate disposition of the remains. Required Mitigation • Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/developer is required to enter into a Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luiserio Indians. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be uncovered during construction as well as provisions for tribal monitors. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiserio Indians shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and ground -breaking activities, including further surveys, to be compensated by the project applicant/developer. The Pechanga Tribal monitors will have the authority to temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any archeological resources discovered on the property, in conjunction with the archeologist and the Lead Agency. • If human remains are encountered, all activity shall stop and the County Corner must be notified immediately. All activity must cease until the County Corner has determined the origin and disposition of said remains. The Corner shall determine if the remains are prehistoric, and shall notify the State Native. American Heritage Commission if applicable. Further actions shall be determined by the desires of the Most Likely Descendant. • The Landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all resources, including ail Luiserio sacred items, burial goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Band of Luiserio Indians for proper treatment and disposition. All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided and preserved. G_1PLANNING120081PA08-0241.Islamic Center DPIPlanninglInitial StudylRevised Initial. Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting. Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than -. Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant . Impact No impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a.i.ii. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: A Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Analysis was completed by Earth -Strata Inc., dated September 17, 2008. According to this analysis, the project is proposed to be located within a seismically active region. As a result, significant ground shaking will likely impact the site within the design life of the project. The geologic structure of the entire southern California area is dominated by northwest -trending faults associated with the San Andreas Fault system, which accommodates for most of the right lateral movement associated with the relative motion between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates. Known active faults within this system include the Newport -Inglewood, Whittier -Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults. No active faults traverse the project site and the site is not located within an Alquest-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. However, based on the review of regional geologic maps and the computer program (USGS 2002 Interactive Deaggregation), the Elsinore -Temecula Fault with an approximate source to site distance of 6:7 kilometers (4 miles) is the closest known active fault anticipated to produce the highest ground accelerations, with an anticipated maximum modal magnitude of 6.6. Based on the data compiled during the preparation of the Preliminary Geotechnical report, it has been determined that the potential for surface rupture to adversely impact the proposed project is low to remote; however, since the proposed project is located within a seismically active region, and ground shaking will likely impact the site during the life of the project, the following mitigation measure shall be required: G:\PLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PIanninglInitial StudylRevised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study_doc Required Mitigation • Structures are required to be designed and constructed to resist the effects of seismic ground motions as provided in the 2007 California Building Code Section 1613. The following seismic design coefficients should be implemented during the design of the proposed structures for the project: it Site Location Latitude: 33.5417 Longitude: -117.1173 Site Class D Mapped Spectral Accelerations for short periods, S5 1.50 Mapped Spectral Accelerations for 1 -Second Period, S1 0.60 Site Coefficient, Fa 1.00 Site Coefficient, Fv 1.50 Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for 1 -Second Short Periods, Sms 1.50 Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for 1 -Second Period, Smi 0.9 Design Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, SDS 1.0 Design Spectral Response Acceleration for 1 -Second Period, SD1 0.60 Seismic Design Category D Importance Factor Based on Occupancy Category 11 All conclusions and recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Study prepared by Earth -Strata, Inc. dated September 17, 2008 shall be incorporated into the plans for the project and implemented during construction. 6.a.iii. Less Than Significant: As indicated above, the project site is located in a seismically active region and within the general vicinity of a number of earthquake faults. The secondary effects of the seismic activity could produce several types of ground failure at the site. These include landslides, ground lurching, shallow ground rupture, and liquefaction/lateral spreading. The probability of occurrence of each type of ground failure depends on the severity of the earthquake, distance from the faults, topography, the state of subsurface earth materials, groundwater conditions, and other factors. Based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report all of the potential secondary effects of seismic activity are considered unlikely. Soil liquefaction was specifically examined in the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report. Liquefaction occurs as a .result of substantial loss of shear strength or shearing resistance in loose, saturated, cohesionless earth materials subjected to earthquake induced ground shaking. Potential impacts from liquefaction include loss of bearing capacity, liquefaction related settlement, lateral movements, and surface manifestation such as sand boils. Seismically induced settlement occurs when loose sandy soils become denser when subjected to shaking during an earthquake. The three factors determining whether a site is likely to be subject to liquefaction include: seismic ground shaking, type and consistency of earth materials, and groundwater level. The proposed project will be supported by compact fill, competent alluvium and bedrock, with groundwater at a depth of over 51 feet. As such, the potential for earthquake induced liquefaction and lateral spreading beneath the proposed structures is considered very low to remote due to the recommended compacted fill, relatively low groundwater level, and the dense nature of the deeper onsite earth materials. 6.a.iv. No Impact: According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report, landslides are identified as a type of ground failure that is typically studied. However, the report mentions that landslide debris was not observed during the subsurface exploration and no ancient landslides are known to exist on the site_ No impact from landslides is expected to occur. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PIanningllnitial StudylRevised Initial Study\CEQA InitialStudy_doc 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a substantial loss of topsoil or erosion since the project will be graded according to all Public Works specifications and will be paved and improved with asphalt, concrete, landscaping and other materials. Therefore, soil erosion or loss of topsoil is not likely to occur and a less than significant impact is anticipated. 6.c.d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report completed for the project by Earth -Strata, dated September 17, 2008, the site visit indicates that landslide debris were not observed on the site and no ancient landslides are known to exist on the site. In addition, the preliminary laboratory test results indicate that the proposed structures will be supported by compacted fill, competent alluvium and bedrock, with groundwater at a depth of over 51 feet. As such, the potential for earthquake induced lateral spreading beneath the proposed structures is considered very low to remote due to the recommended compacted fill, relatively low groundwater level, and the dense nature of the deeper on-site earth materials. The Preliminary Geotechnical report also indicates that preliminary laboratory test results illustrate that onsite earth materials exhibit an expansion potential of low to medium as classified in accordance with the 2007 California Building Code Section 1802.3.2 and ASTM D4829-03. It cannot be determined at this time by the laboratory tests that have already been conducted for the project site whether the soil has an either low or medium expansion potential. As a result, the following mitigation measures shall be required for the earth materials tested upon completion of the rough grading: Required Mitigation • The appropriate preliminary design and construction recommendations contained in the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report completed by Earth -Strata, dated September 17, 2008, outlined on page 15 under the heading "Low Expansion Potential" and on page 16 under the heading "Medium Expansion Potential", shall be incorporated into the project design, depending upon the determination of the levels of expansion anticipated for the project, as determined at the completion of the rough grading stage of the project. 6.e. No Impact: Per the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report dated September 17, 2008 by Earth - Strata, Inc. the property is considered suitable for the proposed development from a geotechnical and engineering perspective. The project will utilize a sewer connection. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems are proposed. G_IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DPIPlanninglInitial StudylRevised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a Issues and Supporting Information Sources Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Potentially :Significant Impact Less Than !; Significant With Mitigation incorporated - Less Than Significant Impact> X No Impact b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: 7.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: At this time there are no adopted statewide guidelines for greenhouse gas emission (GHG) impacts, but this is being addressed through the provisions of Senate Bill 97 (SB 97). For the proposed project, the project would be considered to have a significant impact if the project would be in conflict with the AB 32 State goals for reducing GHG emissions and have. Staff assumes that AB 32 will be successful in reducing GHG emissions and reducing the cumulative GHG emissions statewide by 2020. It is not anticipated that the project could have a major impact (either positively or negatively) on the global concentration of GHG. GHG impacts are considered to be exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non -cumulative greenhouse gas emission impacts from a climate change perspective (CAPCOA, 2008). The proposed project would contribute to global climate change as a result of emissions of GHGs, primarily CO2, emitted by construction activities. However, the project will not conflict with the CARB's thirty-nine (39) recommended actions in California's AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan. The project will also not exceed the SCAQMD GHG screening threshold (3,000 metric tons CO2e/yr). In addition, the City of Temecula does not have any plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of. GHGs. The project is expected to have a less than significant impact with regard to greenhouse gas emissions. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PIanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant, Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than ';Significant Impact 1. No :Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X. f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency . response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildiands? X Comments: 8.a. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed land use is a religious facility and will not be routinely transporting, using or disposing hazardous materials_ 8.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The proposed project is a religious facility and will not emit hazardous materials into the environment, or impact the public through day-to-day operations. In addition, the project will not require the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances and waste. Additionally, the proposed project is not located within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. 8.d. No Impact: The proposed project will not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The California Environmental Protection Agency lists Hazardous G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DPIPlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc. Waste and Substances Sites. The project site is not on this list, therefore no impact related to hazardous materials posing a significant hazard to the public or environment will occur. 8.e. Potential Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The French Valley Airport lies approximately two miles to the northwest and is the only air strip in the immediate area. Areas surrounding French Valley Airport have been categorized into six zones. The proposed structure resides in Zone E which is the least restrictive of all zones. Per the City of Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report, Zone E only prohibits hazards to aircraft flight. The proposed project was also reviewed by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. The Commission stated that no action was necessary because of the project location, but the Commission did provide standard mitigation measures which address safety hazards. Required Mitigation • The following uses shall be prohibited: o Any use which would direct steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward and aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. o Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. o Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract Targe concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. o Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. • Any outdoor lighting that is installed shall be hooded or shielded so as s to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. • The attached notice shall be provided to all potential purchasers and tenants of the property and shall be recorded as a deed notice (notice is attached to the Mitigation Monitoring Program). 8.f. No. Impact: The project is not located with within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project will not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the :proJect area as a result of a private airfield. No impact is anticipated. 8.g. No Impact: The proposed project will not impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed project site is located within an area that is surrounded by residential development and a religious facility located immediately across Calle Colibri. In addition, the subject parcel for which the project is proposed is zoned Very Low (VL) residential and is intended to be developed. The development of this parcel will not physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. 8.h. No Impact: According to the City of Temecula Geographic Information Systems Department, the project site is not located within a High Fire Hazard area. Therefore, the project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are. adjacent to urbanized areas or where residents intermixed with wildlands. The closest High Fire Hazard areas are located approximately 4.5 miles to the northeast and southwest of the project area. Since the project is not located within a High Fire Hazard area and is not located in the immediate proximity of a High Fire Hazard area, injury, death and loss of life resulting from a wildfire is not likely to occur. Additionally, the City of G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DPIPIanningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study_doc Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau has reviewed and conditioned the proposed project to ensure that it meets all fire code requirements, and that the project will be provided with fire protection, if needed, in the case that fire does occur on-site. GAPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center ©P1PlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources - Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact . No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project -specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project proposes a religious facility totaling 24,943 square feet. This type of development typically generates domestic and/or municipal wastewater that does not require pretreatment or waste discharge requirements. No water quality standards are forecast to be violated by implementing the proposed project. In addition, the project submitted a Water Quality Management Plan for review by the Public Works Department_ This document has been conceptually accepted. Upon acceptance of a final WQMP, Best Management Practices outlined in the WQMP will be implemented which will control storm water runoff pollution to a level of no significance. Therefore an overall less than significant impact is anticipated. G_1PLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center. DPIPlanninglInitiai Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study_doc 9.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is not anticipated to result in a substantial depletion of groundwater supplies or substantial interference with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table. The proposed project is not anticipated to have an effect on the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 9.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. Through the implementation of the project SWPPP (Storm Water Protection Program), erosion and siltation issues will be controlled to a less than significant impact level and this project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site. 9.d.e.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would increase runoff as a result of increasing the impervious surface on the project site. The City imposes standard design criteria to detain surface runoff on the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume from the site is not significantly increased. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements established by the State of California. However, the project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) pursuant to the Municipal Separate Storm -Sewer permit (MS4 Permit) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). A preliminary plan has been submitted and conceptually accepted and the project will comply with RWQCB standards as designed. Based upon the information presented above, no significant adverse impact to either downstream flows or water quality is forecast to affect properties downstream of the site from developing the property as proposed. Less than significant impacts are proposed. 9.g. No Impact: The proposed project is for a religious facility and features no residential component. As a result, the project does not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area. 9.h.i. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The proposed project may expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of a flood plain but not by the failure of a levee or dam. The subject property is not located within a dam inundation area per the City's General Plan. In addition, the City has implemented a multi -hazard functional plan pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act. Staff has also received correspondence from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District indicating that the project would not be impacted by the District Master Drainage Plan facilities. Flood Control also states that the project is located within the limits of the district's Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. The proJect will be conditioned to pay these fees prior to issuance of grading permits. The City's Public Works Department indicated that the following mitigation measures must be incorporated: Required Mitigation • Prior to issuance of a Precise Grading Permit for Phase 2, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be submitted for review and approval by City of Temecula, Riverside County . Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD), and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to determine the extent of the required improvements to Santa Gertrudis Channel, Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. Approval from all pertinent local, state and federal environmental agencies shall be obtained. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall also be processed and approved by FEMA, subsequent to provision of the required infrastructure improvements. • A Drainage Study shall be submitted for review and approval with the precise grading plan in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and G: 1Pt_ANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PIanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial StudyICEQA Initial Study.doc provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. 9.j. No Impact: Due to the project area's distance from the ocean and elevation, there is no potential for a tsunami. The project area is not located near a large surface water body and there is no potential for inundation by seiche or mudflow. No impacts are anticipated. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PIanning\lnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting information Sources Potentially '' Significant- Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No. .' impact a Physically divide an established community? X b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 1O.a. No Impact: The proposed project will not physically divide an established community. The proposed project is an infill development project located on a 4.32 acre parcel, which is currently vacant. The proposed project is surrounded by residential parcels to the north, west and south, a religious facility to the east. The project does not involve any additional street or highway improvements which could otherwise divide an established community. 10.b. No Impact: The proposed project will not conflict with an applicable land use plan, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project, (including, but not limited to the General Plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Very Low (VL) residential. The zoning for the property is also Very Low residential. The proposed religious facility is consistent with the General Plan land use and zoning designations for the property. The proposed project meets all Development Code and zoning standards. Since the Development Code is a tool to implement the General Plan, and this project meets all Development Code Requirements, it can be concluded that the project is also consistent with the General Plan. No conflict with any applicable land use plan will occur. 10.c. No Impact: The proposed development of the project will' not conflict with the provisions of the Multi - Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The MSHCP is a comprehensive, multi jurisdictional plan which focuses on the conservation of 146 species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The Plan's overall goal is to maintain biological and ecological diversity within the rapidly urbanizing area. The Plan Area encompasses approximately 1.26 million acres and includes the City of Temecula within its boundaries. In considering the development of this site in the context of the MSHCP, it has been determined that the project site is not located within an MSHCP Criteria CeII. However, according to the MSHCP, the site does have a potential for Borrowing Owl habitat. Additional information related to the findings and analysis contained in the biological assessment can be found in the Biological Resources Section (above -Section 4). GIPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1Planninglinitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact .. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Comments: 11.a. No Impact: The construction of this project on the proposed site is not anticipated to result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residences of the State. According to the General Plan, the State Division of Mines and Geology has prepared a mineral resources report entitled Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California, Special Report 165, which evaluated mineral deposits within the Temecula Planning Area. According to the State Geologist, the Temecula Planning Area was classified as a Mineral Resources Zone -3a (MRZ-3a), which determined that the area contains sedimentary deposits which have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate, however these areas are not considered to contain mineral resources of significant economic value. 11.b. No Impact: The project is not anticipated to result in the Toss of locally important mineral resources, as the project site, which is within the above mentioned Temecula Planning area, has been classified as a Mineral Resources Zone -3a (MRZ-3a). According to the General Plan, the Temecula Planning Area is not considered to contain mineral resources of significant economic value. The property on which the proposed project will be located does not represent an area of locally important mineral resources. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP 1Planningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially -, Significant Impact . Less Than Significant With Mitigation : Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a.b.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: Development of the land will result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long-term. No activities are anticipated within the proposed project that would expose persons to generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. The project will create some noise levels over that currently emanating from the project site as patrons arrive and leave the religious facility. However, those noises are not anticipated to create a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project due to the low impact nature of a religious institution. The project may result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 50 feet, which is considered bothersome. However, noise from construction of the project will comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity to Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No significant impacts are anticipated. 12.e.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The project is located within the French Valley Comprehensive Land Use Plan issued by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. The plan divides the area surrounding the airport into six zones. Many of these zones prohibit the development of highly noise -sensitive outdoor nonresidential uses. According to this plan, the project is located in Zone E. This zone does not include the prohibition of highly noise -sensitive nonresidential uses. The French Valley airport is the only airstrip located in the vicinity of the project site. The project is not located within the French Valley Airport Noise Contours exhibit provided on page N-13 of the City of Temecula General Plan. A less than significant impact is anticipated. G:IPLANNING1200131PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PIanninglinitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 13.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not induce substantial population growth in the area. The proposed project is for a religious facility located in a Very Low Residential zoning district in the City of Temecula. This religious facility is not anticipated to create new jobs in a manner that will substantially raise the population in the Temecula area. In the event jobs are created, the minimal increase in population that may potentially result is considered to be Tess than significant when compared to the projected population growth that is anticipated for the Temecula Area. 13.b.c. No Impact: The project includes the construction and operation of a 24,943 square foot religious facility on a vacant parcel within a Very Low Residential zoning district in the City of Temecula. Considering the site is currently vacant, it can be concluded that the project will not displace existing housing or necessitate the construction or replacement of housing elsewhere. G:IPEANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial StudyICEQA Initial Study.doc 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact% Less Than Significant; With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant . Impact No Impact a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will have a less than significant impact upon the need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The development of the site will incrementally increase the need for these services; however the development of this parcel was anticipated in the Final Environmental impact Report that was prepared for the City of Temecula General Plan. Therefore, the need for public services was previously analyzed and determined. As a result, the incremental increase in the need for these services, based upon the development of this project, will not result in a significant environmental impact. No additional police or fire facilities will be required to be constructed in order to maintain acceptable service ratios or fire/emergency response times. No additional parks or other facilities are proposed to be constructed as part of this project. Furthermore, the project will contribute its fair share to public services through the City's. Development Impact Fees for the maintenance or provision of services from these entities. The project itself is not proposing a residential use and therefore will have no impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. Development of the subject parcel will not cause a significant increase in the number of people within, or coming to, the City of Temecula. The incremental effect from the project will be mitigated through the payment of applicable school fees at the time the project is developed. A Tess than significant impact to existing public services is anticipated as a result of the project. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PIanningllnitial StudylRevised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study_doc 15. RECREATION. a Issues and Supporting Information ounces Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Potentially Significant Impact! Less Than, Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than s Significant ,' Impact X b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? x Comments: 15.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will have a less than significant impact on the existing recreational opportunities and existing parks since the proposed project is a non-residential development. The City owns and maintains 38 parks, and has two recreational centers, and outdoor amphitheater, a gymnasium, two swimming pools, a senior center, the Temecula Museum and Children's Museum. There are 22 neighborhood parks in the Temecula Planning Area which serve the recreational needs of the residents, and based upon the City's population of 72,715 residents at the time that the General Plan was updated, the City should offer 364 acres of parkland. Currently there are 308.73 acres of parkland existing within the City. The proposed project may slightly increase the use of the existing parks or other recreational facilities in the area because it is possible the patrons of the religious facility may wish to visit the existing public park located approximately 1,700 feet to the east near Calle Girasol. It must be noted that nearly all patrons of the religious facility and park will be Temecula residents. As such, since this project is a non-residential development, the demand for parks would not increase significantly as a result of this project. The proposed project would not directly result in the substantial deterioration of the existing recreational and park facilities, nor would this project increase the deterioration of existing park and recreational facilities. 15.b. No Impact: The project does not require or include the construction or expansion or recreational facilities that could otherwise have an adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project is for the development of a 24,943 square foot religious facility. The scope of the project does not include the construction of any additional recreational facilities or parks. Therefore, no impact will occur as a result of the project. G;IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PIanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant impact. Less Than Significant With Mitigation rincorporated Less Than Significant Impact::- No Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e Result in inadequate emergency access? X f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: 16.a.b. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan. Religious facilities are permitted with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit in Very Low Residential zoning districts and are exempt from performing a traffic impact analysis. However, a traffic study was performed by KOA Corporation and submitted to the city on. October 15, 2010 in order to ensure compliance with all appropriate traffic regulations. Based on the intersections and roadways evaluated, the study reveals that if the recommended mitigation is followed, the proposed project will not result in a conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system in the project area. Further, the project will not conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including but not 'limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the County congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. A summary of the traffic study follows: The traffic study analyzed the following intersections: • Winchester Road and Margarita Road • Winchester Road and Nicolas Road • Nicolas Road and General Kearny Road • Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Walcott Lane and La Serena Way G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DPIPlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc In addition, the traffic study included the following cumulative projects in the analysis: Project Name Size Land Use Kingdom Hall of Jehovah Witness 8,264 Square Feet Religious Facility Saraphina 67 Single Family Homes Single Family Residential Roripaugh Ranch 2,015 Single Family Homes Single Family Residential AM/PM Car Wash 946 Square Feet Commercial Gas Station Car Wash Walcott Estates 45 Single Family Homes Single Family Residential The intersections were evaluated using a variety of scenarios. These scenarios and their corresponding analysis are indicated below: Friday/Sunday Peak Hour intersection Performance Opening Year (2013) Conditions Without and With Project Intersection Opening Year Without Project Opening Year With Project a Delay Significant LOS LOS Friday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd F F 0.1 No 2_ Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd F F 5.3 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd D D 2.2 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* A C 15.8 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* B B 0.3 No Sunday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd E E 1.1 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd E E 3.5 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd C C -2.3 • No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* A A 2.7 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* A A 0.2 No The first set of scenarios represent the existing conditions with and without the project at opening year (2013). The opening year scenario includes an ambient growth rate of 2% per year. The table currently shows that the intersection of Winchester Road/Nicolas Road will continue to operate at a level of service (LOS) of F for the Friday peak hour and a LOS of E during the Sunday Peak hour. The LOS results are the same with and without the project. The Friday peak hour LOS deterioration is attributed to the significant number of school age pedestrians and vehicular traffic associated with the picking -up of students at Chaparral High School located on the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. The bulk of this increased traffic occurs within 15-20 minutes surrounding the school dismissal time of 2 p.m. After the school dismissal period is over, LOS improves and the intersection operates normally. The Sunday peak hour LOS is attributed to the ambient growth rate of 2% per year for the area. Impacts to the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road intersection will be mitigated by the City of Temecula's Adaptive Traffic Signal system. Recognizing that the LOS and delays at intersections along Winchester Road are currently operating less than satisfactory, the City of Temecula has initiated the implementation of an Adaptive Traffic Signal System to mitigate conditions. The adaptive system monitors traffic flows system wide and adjusts traffic signal cycle lengths to address the changes in traffic flows, minimize delays, and improve system progression. By virtue of this continual monitoring, intersection. LOS is improved significantly, typically by 10 to 15 percent. The implementation of the adaptive system will be completed by April 2011. The traffic study G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PIanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study_doc utilized the adaptive system to analyze the operation of the intersection and found that it will mitigate the intersection to a level of no significant impact. The below table summarizes these findings: Level of Service Analysis for Opening Year Conditions with Mitigation Intersection Opening Year Without Project O enin p g Year With Project A Delay Opening Year With Project With Mitigation Impact LOS LOS LOS Friday Peak Hour 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd F F 5.3 ' F No Sunday Peak Hour 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd E E 3.5 E No The second set of scenarios represents cumulative projects, 2% per year ambient growth rate and with and without the project. This analysis also includes Roripaugh Ranch as a variable. The results of the analysis are presented below: Friday/Sunday Peak Hour Intersection Performance Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (Including Roripaugh Ranch) Intersection Cumulative Year 2013 Without Project Cumulative Year 20 13 . With Project © day Significant LOS LOS Friday Peak Hour I. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd F F 4.6 Yes 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd F F 5.0 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd D D 1.0 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* A F 66.2 Yes 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* B B 0.7 No Sunday Peak Hour I. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd E E 0.5 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd D d 0.5 No 3. Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd C C -L3 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* A A 1.8 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* B B 0.3 No As shown, three intersections will continue to operate at unsatisfactory levels of service during the Friday peak hour. These intersections are Winchester Road/Margarita Road, Winchester Road/Nicolas Road, and Nicolas Road/Calle Colibri. As previously indicated, the LOS and delays at intersections along Winchester Road are currently operating less than satisfactory, the City of Temecula has initiated the implementation of an Adaptive Traffic Signal System to mitigate conditions. The adaptive system monitors traffic flows system wide and adjusts traffic signal cycle lengths to address the changes in traffic flows, minimize delays, and improve system progression. By virtue of this continual monitoring, intersection LOS is improved significantly, typically by 10 to 15 percent_ The implementation of the adaptive system will be completed by April 2011. The traffic study G:IPLANNINGl20081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\Planninglinitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc indicates that the City proposed adaptive signal system will become appropriate mitigation to relieve traffic impacts to the Winchester intersections with Margarita and Nicolas. An additional mitigation is the extension of the existing left turn lane at the Winchester Road/Margarita Road intersection. This improvement will be constructed through the City's Capital Improvement program and is not the responsibility of the religious facility applicant. The Roripaugh Ranch development has been conditioned to improve the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road intersection through a Development Agreement. These improvements include: • Northbound Approach: Widen to provide two left turn lanes, four through lanes, and two right turn lanes • Southbound Approach: Widen to provide two left turn lanes, four through lanes, and one right turn lane • Eastbound Approach: Widen to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane • Westbound Approach: Widen to provide three left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right tum lane These improvements are tied directly to the Roripaugh Ranch development and are not the responsibility of the religious facility applicant. The increased delay at the Nicolas Road/Calle Colibri intersection is attributed to increased vehicle volumes along Nicolas Road generated by the Roripaugh Ranch development, causing project generated traffic to wait to access Nicolas Road. The traffic study indicated that mitigation for the Nicolas Road/Calle Colibri intersection must include a two-way left turn lane along the project frontage from the eastbound approach. This mitigation measure is the responsibility of the religious facility applicant and will be included as a condition of approval attached to the project's frontage improvement responsibility. Required Mitigation • Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri -- Eastbound Approach: Widen to provide a two-way left turn lane along the project frontage The adaptive signal system, lane widening, and two-way left turn lane mitigation measure will reduce impacts at these intersections to a level that is less than significant. The below table summarizes these findings: Level of Service Analysis of Mitigation for Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions (Including Roripaugh. Ranch) Intersection Cumulative Year 2013 Without Project Cumulative Year 2013 With Project pay Cumulative Year 2013 With Project With Mitigation Impact LOS LOS LOS Friday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd F F 4.6 F No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd F F 5.0 F No 3. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* A F 66.2 A No G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DPIPlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc The third set of scenarios represents the cumulative project, the 2% per year growth rate and with and without the project but excludes Roripaugh Ranch as a variable. The results of this analysis are presented below: Friday/Sunday Peak Hour Intersection Performance Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (Excluding Roripaugh Ranch) Intersection Cumulative Year 2013 Without project Cumulative Year 20I 3 With Project A Delay Significant LOS LOS Friday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd F F 0.2 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd F F 6.4 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd D D 1.5 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* A C 19.0 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* B B 0.4 No Sunday Peak Hour I. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd E E 1.6 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd E E 5.8 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd C C -2.2 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* A A 2.7 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* A A 0.2 No The table indicates that the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road intersection during both the Friday and Sunday peak hour will operate at unsatisfactory levels of service under this scenario. The Friday peak hour LOS deterioration is attributed to the significant number of school age pedestrians and vehicular traffic associated with the picking -up of students at Chaparral High School located on the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. The bulk of this increased traffic occurs within 15-20 minutes surrounding the school dismissal time of 2 p.m. After the school dismissal period is over, the intersection operates normally and LOS improves. The Sunday peak hour LOS is attributed to the ambient growth rate of 2% per year for the area. The traffic study indicates that appropriate mitigation for this intersection is the implantation of an Adaptive Signal System. As previously mentioned, recognizing that the LOS and delays at intersections along Winchester Road are currently operating less than satisfactory, the City of Temecula has initiated the implementation of an Adaptive Traffic Signal System to mitigate conditions. The adaptive system monitors traffic flows system wide and adjusts traffic signal cycle lengths to address the changes in traffic flows, minimize delays, and improve system progression. By virtue of this continual monitoring, intersection LOS is improved significantly, typically by 10 to 15 percent. The implementation of the adaptive system will be completed by April 2011. The traffic study analyzed the affects of this system and found that it will mitigate the intersection to a level of no significant impact. The below table summarizes these findings: Level of Service Analysis of Mitigation for Cumulative 2013 Conditions (Excluding Roripaugh Ranch) Intersection Cumulative Year 20 13 Without Cumulative Year 2013.0e With ay Cumulative Year 2013 With Impact G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1Planningllnitial StudylRevised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc In addition to the required mitigation, the Temecula Capital Improvement Program has three infrastructure improvement projects underway to accommodate the growth and volume of traffic generated by business and recreation areas. The below referenced projects will provide additional traffic relief: French Valley Parkway/I-15 Overcrossing and Interchange Project provides for construction of a new freeway interchange on the 1-15 between the existing Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/1-215 freeway split. The project includes the construction of a freeway overcrossing, high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and collector/distributor (CD) lanes, construction of braided ramps between Winchester Road and the proposed new Interchange for both the northbound and southbound directions, and the construction of a by-pass exit ramp southbound north of the 1-15/1-215 freeway junction to French Valley Parkway. The construction of the French Valley Parkway will reduce delays and alleviate current LOS deficiencies along Winchester Road. The construction of this facility will redistribute traffic within the circulation system thereby offsetting the proposed projects impacts at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. French Valley Parkway (Date Street), Winchester Road to Margarita Road will widen the current arterial from two to four lanes and is being constructed by the cities of Temecula and Murrieta. The widening and extension project will complete the connection between Interstate 15 and Winchester Road (SR79 North) at Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Butterfield Stage Road will extend from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Calle Chapos. The extension will provide a north -south link between Temecula and Murrieta. Drivers will be able to travel up Butterfield and then turn left on Murrieta Hot Springs to enter Murrieta. When completed, Butterfield will have two lanes in each direction with a raised center median. Improvements listed above will help alleviate roadway congestion and improve intersection LOS along Winchester Road. It is anticipated that approximately 20-30 percent of the existing and projected daily peak hour trips will diverted to the newly constructed roadways listed above. Diverted routes are roadways where trips will divert from an existing congested roadway facility to access newly constructed streets that connect to main roadway arterials or regional freeway facilities. For example, the existing trips that currently access the 1- 1.5 through the Winchester Road interchange will divert from their normal route with the construction of the French Valley Parkway/I-15 Overcrossing and Interchange project. The resulting diverted trips will create a decrease in the traffic volumes along Winchester Road. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\Planningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc Project Project Project With Mitigation LOS LOS LOS Friday Peak Hour 2_ Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd F F 6.4 F No Sunday Peak Hour 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd E E 5.8 E No In addition to the required mitigation, the Temecula Capital Improvement Program has three infrastructure improvement projects underway to accommodate the growth and volume of traffic generated by business and recreation areas. The below referenced projects will provide additional traffic relief: French Valley Parkway/I-15 Overcrossing and Interchange Project provides for construction of a new freeway interchange on the 1-15 between the existing Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/1-215 freeway split. The project includes the construction of a freeway overcrossing, high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and collector/distributor (CD) lanes, construction of braided ramps between Winchester Road and the proposed new Interchange for both the northbound and southbound directions, and the construction of a by-pass exit ramp southbound north of the 1-15/1-215 freeway junction to French Valley Parkway. The construction of the French Valley Parkway will reduce delays and alleviate current LOS deficiencies along Winchester Road. The construction of this facility will redistribute traffic within the circulation system thereby offsetting the proposed projects impacts at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. French Valley Parkway (Date Street), Winchester Road to Margarita Road will widen the current arterial from two to four lanes and is being constructed by the cities of Temecula and Murrieta. The widening and extension project will complete the connection between Interstate 15 and Winchester Road (SR79 North) at Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Butterfield Stage Road will extend from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Calle Chapos. The extension will provide a north -south link between Temecula and Murrieta. Drivers will be able to travel up Butterfield and then turn left on Murrieta Hot Springs to enter Murrieta. When completed, Butterfield will have two lanes in each direction with a raised center median. Improvements listed above will help alleviate roadway congestion and improve intersection LOS along Winchester Road. It is anticipated that approximately 20-30 percent of the existing and projected daily peak hour trips will diverted to the newly constructed roadways listed above. Diverted routes are roadways where trips will divert from an existing congested roadway facility to access newly constructed streets that connect to main roadway arterials or regional freeway facilities. For example, the existing trips that currently access the 1- 1.5 through the Winchester Road interchange will divert from their normal route with the construction of the French Valley Parkway/I-15 Overcrossing and Interchange project. The resulting diverted trips will create a decrease in the traffic volumes along Winchester Road. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a Issues and Supporting Information Sources Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\Planningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc Comments: 17.a.b.e. Less. Than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements,. require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. However, since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 17.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project will create storm water impacts for the surrounding area. The project has been reviewed by the City of Temecula Public Works Department, which has concluded that the project will require the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or the expansion of existing storm water facilities. The below mitigation measures have been provided by the City of Temecula Public Works Department: Required Mitigation • A Drainage Study shall be submitted with the precise grading plan for review and approval in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. 17.d. Less Than Significant impact: The project is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). This agency has indicated that water availability is contingent upon water supply shortage contingency measures pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan. However, the project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "RCWD anticipates supplying water to 167,640 persons within its service area in 2020" (pg. 5.14-3). The FEIR further states: "EMWD anticipates supplying water to 756,699 persons within its service area in 2020" (pg. 5.14-3). This anticipated water supply includes a portion of Temecula. G:IP.LANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PIanningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA initial Study_doc applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? , X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a.b.e. Less. Than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements,. require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. However, since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 17.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project will create storm water impacts for the surrounding area. The project has been reviewed by the City of Temecula Public Works Department, which has concluded that the project will require the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or the expansion of existing storm water facilities. The below mitigation measures have been provided by the City of Temecula Public Works Department: Required Mitigation • A Drainage Study shall be submitted with the precise grading plan for review and approval in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. 17.d. Less Than Significant impact: The project is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). This agency has indicated that water availability is contingent upon water supply shortage contingency measures pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan. However, the project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "RCWD anticipates supplying water to 167,640 persons within its service area in 2020" (pg. 5.14-3). The FEIR further states: "EMWD anticipates supplying water to 756,699 persons within its service area in 2020" (pg. 5.14-3). This anticipated water supply includes a portion of Temecula. G:IP.LANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PIanningllnitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA initial Study_doc Since the project is consistent with the City's General Pian, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the this project. 17.f.g. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City_ Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\PlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues: and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than SignificantVUith Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact: No impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 18.a. Less than Significant Impact: This site is surrounded by development and does not contain any viable habitat for fish or wildlife species. This is an in -fill development and it does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.b. Less than Significant Impact: The effects from this project are Tess than significant from a cumulative impact perspective. None of the impacts associated with the project will be considerable when viewed in connection with the effect of the past projects, current projects and future projects. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.c. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly_ The project will be designed and developed consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1Planning\Initial Study\Revised Initial Study\CEQA Initial Study.doc 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 19.a. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report were used as a reference source in preparing this Initial Study. These documents are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 43200 Business Park Drive 19.b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19.c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. Burrowing Owl Survey prepared by PCR Services Corporation, April 16, 2010 5. Cultural Resource Assessment prepared by Michael Brandman Associates, January 20, 2010 6. Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report prepared by Earth -Strata, Inc. September 17, 2008 G:IPLANNING120081PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP1PlanninglInitial Study\Revised Initial StudyICEQA Initial Study.doc Project Description: Location: Applicant: Mitigation Monitoring Program A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Exception for Height (PA08-0241, PA08-0242 and PA09-0154), two-story, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located on a 4.32 acre parcel at APN 957-140-012. The project will be constructed in two phases consisting of 4,157 square feet in the first phase and 20,786 square feet in the second phase. Generally located on the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Stephen Sigilar 28751 Rancho California Road, Suite 207 Temecula, CA. 92590 Air Quality General Impact: Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Mitigation Measures: 1. Use of Best Available Control Measures pursuant to Air Quality Management District guidelines for PM10 and for diesel equipment exhaust: and during all grading activities. 2. Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. 3. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. 4. Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 5. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. 6. Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. 7 Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. 8. Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for than 96 hours after clearing is completed. 9. Ensure that all cut and fill slopes are permanently protected from erosion. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: 10. Require the construction contractor to ensure that all construction equipment is maintained in peak working order. 11. Limit allowable idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. 12. Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 13. Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. 14. Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. 15. Wash or sweep away access points daily. 16. Sandbag construction sites for erosion control. Place the above conditions of approval on this project to reduce construction equipment emissions and dust; and to protect sensitive receptors generated by grading/soil disturbance and construction operations. During grading and construction. Planning Department and Public Works Department General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: Biological Resources Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 17. A 30 -day Burrowing Owl Pre -construction Survey shall be conducted prior to any ground disturbing activity. If burrowing owls are found on the site, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall be consulted regarding relocation of the owls. Relocation may only occur during the non - breeding season. Alternatively, pre -construction surveys may be conducted at five-day intervals until three consecutive surveys fail to find owls on the site. Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than significant level. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc Mitigation Milestone: Precise Grade Plan shall show that the required Mitigation Measures have been incorporated into the project design prior to the issuance of grading permit/building permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department Cultural Resources General Impact: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 Mitigation Measures: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 18. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/developer is required to enter into a Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be uncovered during construction as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 19. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and ground -breaking activities, including further surveys, to be compensated by the project applicant/developer. The Pechanga Tribal monitors will have the authority to temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any archeological resources discovered on the property, in conjunction with the conjunction with the archeologist and the Lead Agency. 20. If human remains are encountered, all activity shall stop and the County Corner must be notified immediately. All activity must cease until the County Corner has determined the origin and disposition of said remains. The Corner shall determine if the remains are prehistoric, and shall notify the State Native American Heritage Commission if applicable. Further actions shall be determined by the desires of the Most Likely Descendant. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc Specific Process: 21. The Landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all resources, including all Luiseno sacred items, burial goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition. 22. All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided and preserved. 23. A qualified Paleontologist shall be on-site during grading activities. Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall be placed on all applicable project plans. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department Geology and Soils General Impact: Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Mitigation Measures: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Strong seismic ground shaking. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 24. Structures are required to be designed and constructed to resist the effects of seismic ground motions as provided in the 2007 California Building Code Section 1613. The following seismic design coefficients should be implemented during the design of the proposed structures for the project: C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc Site Location 1iilimim uuuu iiiii�iiiiuuu ui tl mi uuu 111111111111111111% uu Latitude: 33.5407 Longitude: -117.1098 Site Class D Mapped Spectral Accelerations for short periods, Ss 1.50 Mapped Spectral Accelerations for 1 -Second Period, S 0.60 Site Coefficient, Fa 1.00 Site Coefficient, F, 1.50 Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for 1 -Second Short Periods, Sms 1.50 Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration for 1 -Second Period, Smi 0.9 Design Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, SDS 1.0 Design Spectral Response Acceleration for 1 -Second Period, SD1 0.60 Seismic Design Category D Importance Factor Based on Occupancy Category I I Specific Process: 25. All conclusions and recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Study prepared by Earth -Strata, Inc. dated February 9, 2009 shall be incorporated into the plans for the project and implemented during construction. 26. The appropriate preliminary design and construction recommendations contained in the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report completed by Earth - Strata, dated February 9, 2009, outlined on page 15 under the heading "Low Expansion Potential" and on page 16 under the heading "Medium Expansion Potential," shall be incorporated into the project design, depending upon the determination of the levels of expansion anticipated for the project, as determined at the completion of the rough grading stage of the project. Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall be placed on all applicable project plans. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department and Public Works C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc General Impact: Hazards and Hazardous Materials For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Mitigation Measures: 27. The following uses shall be prohibited: Specific Process: o Any use which would direct steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward and aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing a an airport, other than an FAA approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. o Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. o Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. o Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. 28. Any outdoor lighting that is installed shall be hooded or shielded so as to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. 29. The attached notice shall be provided to all potential purchasers and tenants of the property and shall be recorded as a deed notice (notice is attached to the Mitigation Monitoring Program). Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall be placed on all applicable project plans. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc Hydrology and Water Quality General Impact: Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows. Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: Expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. 30. Prior to issuance of a Precise Grading Permit for Phase 2, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be submitted for review and approval by City of Temecula, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD), and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to determine the extent of the required improvements to Santa Gertrudis Channel, Nicolas Road and Calle Colibir. Approval from all pertinent local, state and federal environmental agencies shall be obtained. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall also be processed and approved by FEMA, subsequent to provision of the required infrastructure improvements. 31. A Drainage Study shall be submitted with the precise grading plan for review and approval in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential hydrology impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall completed before any grading permit is issued. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department and Public Works Department General Impact: Transportation/Traffic Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 32. Nicolas Road/Calle Colibri Intersection — Eastbound Approach: Restripe to provide a two-way left turn lane along the project frontage. Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential traffic impacts to a less than significant level. Above referenced mitigation measure shall completed as part of the frontage improvements Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department and Public Works Department General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: Utilities and Service Systems Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects 33. A Drainage Study shall be submitted with the precise grading plan for review and approval in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential hydrology impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall completed before any grading permit is issued. C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department and Public Works Department C:\Program Files\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\988285.doc COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY George A. Johnson • Agency Director Planning Department Ron Goldman • Planning Director City of Temecula Planning Department June 2, 2010 Phone: (951) 506-5115, FAX: (951) 694-6477 Attention: Eric Jones, Case Planner RE: DRC REVIEW COMMENTS Islamic Center of Temecula Valley CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO's. PA08-00241, -0242 and PA09-0154 We are in receipt of the "Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration" (NOD) for the referenced cases. The following comments are based on my review of this document and the County's GIS database: 1. The site is located in the County's zone of high potential for paleontological resources at shallow depth. The NOD submitted to the County for review does not mention any assessment of the paleontological resources. Rather, it addresses only the cultural (Archaeological) resources (see Section 5.). In addition, the NOD indicates the level of significance for paleontological resources as "The Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated"; however, there are no paleontological resource mitigation recommendations/conditions provided in the NOD. This resource should be assessed and discussion provided in the NOD independent of the archaeological resource. It appears, based on the County's GIS database and General Plan mapping, mitigation of this resource should include, at a minimum, a condition on the project(s) that require(s) a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) prior to issuance of Grading Permits and a condition requiring a report of this monitoring program at some milestone subsequent to completion of site grading. 2. The site is located in the County's subsidence potential zone and moderate liquefaction potential zone. The NOD does address Geologic hazards by reference to a report by prepared by Earth -Strata, Inc. However, the County cannot comment on the content this section of the NOD (Section 6) as the Earth -Strata, Inc. report was not provided to the County for review. 3. The site is located in an area classified by the State of California as MRZ-3 for mineral resources. The site is not designated as being of regional or statewide significance for mineral resources. The NOD indicates "No Impact" to mineral resources. However, given the MRZ-3 classification, it may be more appropriate to indicate the potential impact as "Less Than Significant Impact". Although the County Geologist is not currently contracted with the City of Temecula for geologic hazards review other than for projects within the Alquist-Priolo Zone, or for Riverside Office • 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor P.O. Box 1409, Riverside, Califomia 92502-1409 (951) 955-3200 • Fax (951) 955-3157 Desert Office • 38686 El Cerrito Road Palm Desert, Califomia 92211 (760) 863-8277 • Fax (760) 863-7555 review for potential impacts to Paleontological Resources or Mineral Resources, the County would be happy to provide report review services to the City for other geologic hazards and/or paleontological resources and/or mineral resources. Thank you for the opportunity to review this case for the City of Temecula. Please call me at (951) 955-6863 if you have any questions. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Rondman, Planning Director avid Jones, CEG No. 2283 Chief Engineering Geologist, TLMA-Planning W:\Geology\Temecula Reviews\PA08-0241 DRC.doc June 17, 2010 City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division 43200 Business Park Drive • Temecula, CA 92590 P.0. Box 9033 • Temecula, CA 92589-9033 FAX (951) 694-6477 David Jones Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9tr, Floor Riverside, CA. 9250f SUBJECT: External Agency Comments for a Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for PA08.0241, a two phase commercial development plan for a two-story 24,943 square foot religious facility located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri totaling 4.32 acres; PA08-0242, a Conditional Use Permit to allow the religious facility to operate within a VL zone; PA09-0154, A Minor Exception to allow the religious facility an increase in building height. Dear Mr. Jones: Thank you for reviewing the above -referenced project. This letter shall serve to summarize staff's comment response. County of Riverside Planning Department: 1. Staff will add a mitigation measure/condition of approval indicating that a Paleontologist is present during grading activity. 2. Staff has provided a copy of the Preliminary Geotechnical Report by Earth -Strata for review. 3. The area surrounding the project is developed as primarily residential and the project will be developed as a religious facility. Even though the site as a designation of MRZ-3, the nature of the surrounding area makes it unlikely that a mineral extraction facility will be developed in the area. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (951) 506-5115 or by e-mail at eric.jones@cityoftemecula.org Sincerely, Eric Jones Assistant Planner Enclosures G:\PLANNING\2008\PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP\Planning\Hearing\Response to Initial Study Comments.doc South Loast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov E-MAILED: JUNE 23, 2010 June 23, 2010 Mr. Eric Jones, Planner eric.jones@cityoftemecula.org Planning Division City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft MND) for the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following comments are meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration. In the project description, the lead agency proposes the construction of a two-story 24,943 square foot religious center located on a 4.32 acre parcel that would be constructed in two phases. The lead agency did not quantify the project's construction or operation air quality impacts unlike a recent CEQA document released by the lead agency for a similarly sized project and land use (Developmental Plan with a Conditional Use Permit PA09-0061). Because this information has not been included in the Draft MND, the lead agency has therefore not demonstrated that the proposed project will not yield significant adverse construction or operational air quality impacts that may trigger further analysis and/or mitigation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. To calculate the proposed project's regional air quality impacts, the lead agency can utilize the current URBEMIS 2007 version 9.2.4 land use emissions model', or the lead agency can follow the calculation methodologies in Chapter 9 and the Appendix to Chapter 9 in AQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. In addition, the Draft MND indicates that the proposed project is located within one-quarter mile of sensitive receptors (residential properties) east and south of the proposed project. Therefore, the AQMD staff requests that the lead agency evaluate localized air quality impacts2 to ensure that any nearby sensitive receptors are not adversely affected by the construction activities that are occurring in close proximity. Should the lead agency conclude after its analyses that construction or operational air quality impacts exceed the SCAQMD daily significance thresholds, staff has compiled 1 http://www.agmd.gov/cega/urbemis.html 2 Analysis methodology available here: http://www.aqmd.gov/cega/handbook/LST/LST.html • J 4 w Mr. Eric Jones Planner 2 June 23, 2010 mitigation measures3 in addition to those listed by the lead agency on page 7 that can be implemented if the air quality impacts are determined to be significant. Please provide the AQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the adoption of the Final MND. The SCAQMD staff would be happy to work with the Lead Agency to address these issues and any other questions that may arise. Please contact Gordon Mize, Air Quality Specialist — CEQA Section, at (909) 396-3302, if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, 2 V&7/( Ian MacMillan Program Supervisor, Inter -Governmental Review Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources IM: GM RVC100526-03 Control Number 3 http://www.aqmd.gov/cega/handbook/mitigation/MM intro.html Traffic Study for The Islamic Center of Temecula in the City of Temecula November 1 I, 2010 Prepared for: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589 Prepared by: KOA CORPORATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING 3190 Shelby Street, Bldg. C Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 890-9693 job No: JB04118 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1 2. PROJECT STUDY METHODOLOGY 4 STUDY TIMEFRAMES 4 • PROJECT STUDY AREA 4 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES 4 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 5 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA 6 FUTURE (YEAR 2013) TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 EXISTING CIRCULATION NETWORK 7 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 10 4. THE PROJECT 13 EXISTING LAND USE TRAFFIC 13 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 13 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 14 5. OPENING YEAR WITHOUT AND WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS 18 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 18 6. CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT AND WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT 23 FUTURE GROWTH 23 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 24 7. CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT AND WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH 30 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 30 S. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 36 SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS 36 MITIGATION 36 OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS 36 Winchester Road & Nicolas Road 36 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 CONDITIONS (INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) 37 Winchester Road & Margarita Road 37 Winchester Road & Nicolas Road 37 Nicolas Road & Calle Colibri 37 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 CONDITIONS (EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) 38 Winchester Road & Nicolas Road 38 CITY OF TEMECULA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) 39 9. PROJECT ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION 41 10. CONCLUSIONS 42 KOA Corporation ii November 2010 List of Figures FIGURE I-1 PROJECT STUDY AREA FIGURE 1-2 PROJECT SITE PLAN FIGURE 3-1 EXISTING CIRCULATION NETWORK FIGURE 3-2 EXISTING FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 3-3 EXISTING SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 4-1 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 4-2 PROJECT FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 4-3 PROJECT SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 5-1 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 5-2 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 5-3 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 5-4 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 6-1 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS (INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 26 FIGURE 6-2 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS (INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 27 FIGURE 6-3 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS (INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 28 FIGURE 6-4 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS (INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 29 FIGURE 7-1 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS (EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 32 FIGURE 7-2 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS (EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 33 FIGURE 7-3 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS (EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) FRIDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 7-4 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS (EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 34 FIGURE 7-4 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS (EXCLUDING ROR1PAUGH RANCH PROJECT) SUNDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 35 2 3 9 II 12 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 KOA Corporation iii November 2010 List of Tables TABLE I LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR INTERSECTIONS 5 TABLE 2 FRIDAY/SUNDAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE EXISTING CONDITIONS (YEAR 2010) TABLE 3 TRIP GENERATION RATES TABLE 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION 10 14 14 TABLE 5 FRIDAY/SUNDAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS WITHOUT AND WITH PROJECT 18 TABLE 6 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS (INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) 24 TABLE 7 FRIDAY/SUNDAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT AND WITH PROJECT (INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) 25 TABLE 8 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS (EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) 30 TABLE 9 FRIDAY/SUNDAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE CUMULATIVE YEAR 2013 WITHOUT AND WITH PROJECT (EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT) 3 I TABLE 10 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS WITH MITIGATION 37 TABLE I 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION FOR CUMULATIVE YEAR. 2013 CONDITIONS INCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT 38 TABLE 12 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION FOR CUMULATIVE 2013 CONDITIONS EXCLUDING RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT 39 Appendices APPENDIX A Traffic Count Data (August 2010) APPENDIX B - School and Religious Center Schedules APPENDIX C - Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Existing Conditions APPENDIX D Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Opening Year Conditions APPENDIX E Cumulative Project Information APPENDIX F Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions Including Roripaugh Ranch Project APPENDIX G Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions Excluding Roripaugh Ranch Project APPENDIX F - Cumulative Year 2013 Mitigation Measures KOA Corporation iv November 2010 I. Introduction This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report is prepared for the proposed Islamic Center of Temecula Valley (ICTV) located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri in the City of Temecula. Figure I shows the vicinity of the proposed project as it relates to the regional circulation network. Figure 2 shows the proposed project site plan and local access to the site. The appendices of this report contain background materials for this study. These materials include manual traffic counts, analysis worksheets and other details. Project Location and Description The subject property is currently vacant and located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Road. The proposed project will be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include the construction of a 4,157 -square -foot community center and Phase 2 will include the construction of a 20,786 -square -foot, two-story structure that includes a prayer hall, office space and Sunday School classrooms. The main level of the two story structure is anticipated to be 12,481 square feet and the second floor is anticipated to be 8,305 square feet, for a total of 20,786 square feet. The total gross floor area of the proposed project is anticipated to be at 24,943 square feet upon completion of both phases. This report has been prepared consistent with City of Temecula General Plan requirements. KOA Corporation 1 November 2010 0 LJ LI0 L. ICN Religious Facilities J r-1 < 3— .W Cen Study Intersection Locations 4 a) L) L) O Q November 2010 [V introduction ICTV Religious Facilities c,%17 rl z cn LL November 2010 M KOA Corporation 2. Project Study Methodology This chapter documents the methodologies and assumptions used to conduct the circulation impact analysis for the proposed project. This section contains the following background information: • Study timeframes • Study area description • Capacity analysis methodologies Study Timeframes This report presents an analysis of the intersection operating conditions during the peak periods, which were selected in consultation with City of Temecula staff for the following anticipated timeframe scenarios: • Existing Year 2010 • Opening Year 2013 Without and With Project • Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (including Roripaugh Ranch) • Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (excluding Roripaugh Ranch) The City selected the following peak hours for analysis to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed project during overlapped peak hours between ICN, Chaparral High School, Nicolas Valley Elementary School, Grace Presbyterian Church, and Calvary Baptist Church: • Weekday Friday (peak hours between 1:00 PM and 4:00 PM) • Weekend Sunday (peak hours between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM) Project Study Area The study area was determined through consultation with City of Temecula staff. As shown in Figure I, the study area consists of the following intersections: • Winchester Road at Margarita Road • Winchester Road at Nicolas Road • Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road • Nicolas Road at Calle Colibri (Project Driveway) • Walcott Lane at La Serena Way Analysis Methodologies This section presents a brief overview of traffic analysis methodologies and concepts used in this study. Street system operating conditions are typically described in terms of "level of service." Level of service (LOS) is a report -card scale used to indicate the quality of traffic flow on roadway segments and at intersections. LOS ranges from LOS A (free flow, little congestion) to LOS F (forced flow, extreme congestion). KOA Corporation 4 November 2010 ICTV Religious Facilities Project Study Methodology LOS for signalized intersections is based upon the average time (seconds) that vehicles approaching an intersection are delayed. There is a specific delay and LOS associated with each movement and an overall average delay for all movements. The overall LOS for the intersection is based upon the overall average delay. Unsignalized intersection LOS is also based upon the control delay, but delay is only assessed for those traffic movements that are stopped or must yield to through traffic. Some movements, including cross traffic on the minor street or left turns onto the major street, can be subject to long delays; however, unstopped through traffic and right turns from the major street will not experience any delays. When delay for cross traffic is severe (LOS F) the intersection should be evaluated further for possible improvement with traffic signals. In some cases, this analysis determines that the delay is being experienced by a very low number of vehicles and traffic signals are not warranted. In other cases, the number of stopped vehicles is substantial and traffic signals may be justified as a mitigation measure. Table 1 shows the relationship between LOS and the performance measures for signalized and unsignalized intersections, and lists the HCM delay criteria for signalized intersections. Table Levels of Service for Intersections Level of Service Signalized Intersection Control Delay (in seclveh) Unsignalized Intersection Control Delay (in seclveh) A 0-10 0-10 B 10.1-20 10.1-15 C 20.1-35 15.1-25 D 35.1 -- 55 25. I — 35 E 55.1 — 80 35.1 — 50 *.A/L__ J_1___ 1_ _ F 80.1 or more* 50.1 or more* excessively , delay would be shown as > The City of Temecula follows County of Riverside Traffic Study Guidelines. For the purpose of this report, all intersections along Winchester Road and Nicolas Road will comply with the LOS criteria D or better, according to the City of Temecula General Plan requirements. Mitigation measures should be considered when traffic conditions are forecasted to decline to poorer levels of service. Intersection Capacity Analysis The analysis of peak hour intersection conditions was conducted using the Synchro software program. All signalized intersections were analyzed based on the "operational analysis" procedure for signalized intersections, as defined in the. 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This technique. uses 1,900 passenger cars per hour of green per lane (pcphgpl) as the maximum saturation flow of a single lane at an intersection for existing and future scenarios. This saturation flow rate is adjusted to account for lane width, on -street parking, conflicting pedestrian flow, traffic composition (i.e., percent of trucks), and shared lane movements (e.g., through and right -turn movements from the same lane). LOS for signalized intersections is based on the average time (seconds) that vehicles entering an intersection are delayed. KOA Corporation 5 November 2010 ICN Religious Facilities Project Study Methodology Table 1 lists the HCM delay criteria for signalized intersections. In addition, the existing peak hour factor was added to all of the volumes to analyze the peak hour. Traffic volumes may fluctuate from minute to minute within the peak periods, so a peak hour factor increases the hourly volume to simulate the higher 15 minute peak period for the entire peak period. Existing traffic signal timing sheets were obtained from the City and were used for this study. Existing Traffic Count Data Existing peak hour traffic data was obtained from True Counts in August 2010. Traffic count data presented in this report was commissioned during the time when Chaparral High School, Nicolas Valley Elementary School, Grace Presbyterian Church, and Calvary Baptist Church were in session. All Data used in this report is compiled in Appendix A. Appendix B include ICTV, churches and schools schedules. Future (Year 2013) Traffic Volumes The Year 2013 was selected for opening year of the project. For the purposes of this traffic study, it was conservatively assumed that both phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2) of the project are constructed and all identified cumulative projects would be constructed and operational by the year 2013. Peak hour intersection volumes under Year 2013 conditions were forecast based on existing peak hour intersection volumes, and were adjusted to reflect anticipated growth in the City of Temecula. A total growth factor of 6% (2% per year) was implemented. The approved cumulative project list provided by the City was added to the background base to determine the relative potential impact of the project. KOA Corporation 6 November 2010 3. Existing Conditions This section documents the existing conditions of the circulation network within the study area. The discussion presented here is limited to specific roadways in the project's vicinity. Existing Circulation Network Streets within the vicinity of the project site that could be affected by the proposed project include Winchester Road, Nicolas Road, North General Kearny Road, Calle Colibri, Walcott Lane, and La Serena Way. Figure 3-1 shows the existing roadway classifications/circulation network and intersection configurations/control in the project vicinity. Winchester Road functions as a six -lane principal arterial running on a north/south alignment located west of the project site. The roadway provides three travel lanes in each direction and is divided by a center median. The posted speed limit in the project vicinity is 45 mph south of Nicolas Road and 55 mph north of Nicolas Road. Land uses along this roadway are mostly commercial with no on -street parking permitted on either side. Winchester Road is controlled by traffic signals at Nicolas Road and Margarita Road. Margarita Road functions as a four -lane major arterial running on an eastlwest alignment located south of the project site. The roadway provides two travel lanes in each direction and is divided by a center median. The speed limit is posted at 45 mph with no on -street parking permitted. Land uses along this roadway are a mix of residential and commercial uses. Nicolas Road is a four -lane major arterial running on an eastlwest alignment. The roadway provides two travel lanes in each direction and transitions to a limited secondary arterial just east of Joseph Road. The roadway is divided by a striped median. The speed limit is posted at 45 mph in the project vicinity and on -street parking is generally not permitted. Land uses along this roadway are mostly residential with commercial uses close to Winchester Road. Nicolas Road is controlled by a traffic signal at North General Kearny Road. North General Kearny Road is a two-lane residential roadway running on a north/south alignment located approximately 1 mile west of the project site. The roadway provides mostly one travel lane in each direction. On street parking is generally permitted along the roadway. Ladd uses along this roadway are mostly residential. North General Kearny Road is controlled by traffic signals at Nicolas Road. Calle Colibri is a two-lane roadway running on a north/south alignment located adjacent to the project site. The roadway provides one travel lane in each direction and is undivided. The speed limit is posted at 45 mph in the project vicinity. Land uses along this roadway are mostly residential and vacant lots. Calle Colibri is controlled by a stop sign at Nicolas Road. Walcott Lane is a two-lane collector running on a north/south alignment located approximately one-half mile east of the project site. The roadway provides one travel lane in each direction. The speed limit is posted at 30 mph in the project vicinity and on -street parking is generally not permitted. Land uses along KOA Corporation 7 November 2010 ICN Religious Facilities Existing Conditions this roadway are mostly residential and vacant lots. Walcott Lane is controlled by a stop sign at La Serena Way. La Serena Way is a two-lane collector roadway that transitions into a secondary arterial roadway running on a north/south alignment located approximately one mile east of the project site. The roadway provides one travel lane in each direction and two lanes along roadway segments west of Calle Medusa that is mostly divided by a painted median. The speed limit is posted at 45 mph in the project vicinity and on -street parking is generally not permitted. Land uses along this roadway are mostly residential and vacant Tots. Interstate 1-15 is the nearest freeway that is located approximately 3 miles to the west of the project site. It provides regional north/south circulation to the San Diego and Riverside Counties and provides a full freeway interchange at Winchester Road. KOA Corporation 8 November 2010 Walcott Ln & La SerenaW ff y� "So 'till D"" _ d L =- r 62 L" al 41L 12 2 H c� LIZ Winchester Rd & Margai1ta Rd 4-' 0 LU LU -J E tJ c 2c crt E 0- November 2010 KOA Corporation ICN Religious Facilities Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Figure 3-2 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes during the Friday peak hour. Figure 3-3 illustrates the Sunday peak hour volumes. Table 2 summarizes the results of the LOS analysis for existing conditions. The study area was observed during both morning and evening peak hours. The indicated LOS shown in Table 2 is representative of observed traffic conditions in the study area. Table 2 Friday/Sunday Peak Hour Intersection Performance Existing Conditions (Year 2010) Intersection Without Project Delay LO5 Friday Peak Hour I. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 137.3 F 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 180.3 F 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 38.4 D 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.0 A 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 10.0 A Sunday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 48.1 D 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 52.9 E 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 34.1 C 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.1 A 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 8.4 A ote: Delay based on seconds per vehicle average. * Unsignalized Intersection As shown in Table 2, the majority of intersections currently operate at satisfactory levels of service (LOS D or better) except for the following intersections: • Winchester Road & Margarita Road for the Friday & Sunday peak hour • Winchester Road & Nicolas Road for Friday & Sunday peak hour It should be noted that the significant number of pedestrian/students crossing at the intersection of • Winchester Road and Nicolas Road during Chaparral High School's dismissal time (duration is 15-20 minutes), is considered a major contributing factor to the deterioration in LOS at this intersection. Once the school dismissal period is over, the intersection LOS improves at this location. Appendix C contains the analysis worksheets. KOA Corporation 10 November 2010 Wal cLa e'rtenLan r, Wy to '-157 r9 39-,4 ,.... ,.... as -r_ .L.'4.T (32 icHI 52,7, — u 62 gignsteg"iidcilsr Rd & 2t71‘garny Rd <aNicolas .24 0 .-6571 L214 KAN 644 ...°' in — if co <37 (—inc,900 7 ,1 ,,,T Ve., c219 ° 7 cE),, C436 54 0,-. re 1372 70; kr, 588—) t=tr-co 154 k1 839—) to 220Th '" 173—) ,- co v, 49Th 84Th Friday Peak Hour Volumes 0 Lu 11) 8 0 z November 2010 0 4J00- 0 0 'al a Wet i-ican Wy 4-54 T r9 ' 28 • 43-4 i 6Th 82 _cp.z c0 t• -I 1 rE c. nt ,n 81 ril N a, d ci) cg Fi 24 8t. -,1 1 cC 12" 0.1 z a...Y 96--y la OZ ggeit'sVir Rd Le) (R44-10 r391 7-4 tc-D 16-a Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd r`-393 CD <-324 r233 135j 438—) co do =coo 187- \ N Sunday Peak Hour Volumes 0 uJ CD LU November 2010 KOA Corporation 4. The Project Project related traffic consists of trips on any portion of the street system that will begin or end on the project site as a result of the proposed project development. Project related traffic is a function of the extent and type of development proposed for the site. This following information is used to establish traffic generation for the site. The proposed project will be constructed in two phases. Phase I will include the construction of a 4, 157 -square -foot community center and Phase 2 will include the construction of a 20,786 -square -foot, two-story structure that includes a prayer hall, office space, and Sunday School classrooms. The Main level of the two-story structure is anticipated to be 12,481 square feet and the second floor is anticipated to be 8,305 square feet, for a total of 20,786 square feet. The total gross floor area of the proposed project is anticipated to be at 24,943 square feet upon completion of both phases. Existing Land Use Traffic The project site is currently vacant; therefore, the current trip generation for the project site is zero. Project Trip Generation Trip generation is a measure or forecast of the number of trips that will be made to or from the project. It is generally equal to the traffic volume expected at the project entrance. Trip generation characteristics for projects are normally estimated based on rates published in Trip Generation, Eighth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). This document is widely used in Southern California and indicates the probable traffic generation rates for various land uses based upon studies of existing developments in comparable settings throughout the nation. Due to the unique nature of the proposed project, there are no trip generation rates provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual for this specific type of use. Since the characteristics of the Islamic Worship schedule are not reflected in the ITE literature for trip generation, a unique trip generation rate was developed consistent with similar worship land uses such as a church land use. The church ITE trip rates were taken into consideration in the development of the Islamic Center trip generation used in this report. An individual prayer station area was developed and, as a result, a total number of prayer stations were calculated based on the proposed square footage of the prayer hall. The approach taken in developing the total number of prayer stations for the Islamic Center is consistent with the approach taken by the ITE in calculating the trip generation for a church based on number of seats provided. For the purpose of this report and to evaluate worst case scenario, it is assumed that the Islamic Center project will be fully constructed (phase I and phase 2) by the year 2013. The proposed square footage. of the prayer hall shown on the approved site plan for phase 2 is 3,439 square feet. The individual prayer station was calculated to be approximately 13.5 square feet (4x3.5 -square -foot space). Taking into consideration the total square footage of the prayer hall and individual prayer station, the total number of prayer stations that can be accommodated within the proposed prayer hall is a conservative 255 stations, not accounting for any pathways or aisles. The Sunday church trip rate is used to calculate the trip generation for the Islamic Center during the afternoon Friday prayer (worst case) since it correlates KOA Corporation 13 November 2010 1CTV Religious Facilities The Project to the church Sunday mass peak hour. In addition, the weekday church trip rate is used to calculate the trip generation for the Islamic Center during the Sunday peak hour since it correlates to the church weekday peak hour activities. The Islamic Center activities on Sunday include Sunday school activities. Based on the information provided above, the worst case scenario trip generation rates that are applicable to this project are shown in Table 3 below. Table 3 Trip Generation Rates ITE Rates (modified to fit mosque) Prayer Station Intensity Units Rate Friday (ADT) 255 station 1.85 Friday (peak hour) 255 station 0.61 Sunday (ADT) 255 station 0.61 Sunday (peak hour) 255 station 0.61 Table 4 summarizes the traffic generation expected from the project, based on the trip generation rates shown in Table 3. Table 4 Project Traffic Generation ITE rates (modified to fit mosque) Trips In Out Friday (ADT) 472 Friday (Peak Hour) 156 79 76 Sunday (ADT) I56 Sunday (peak hour) 156 78 78 The project will generate a total of 472 daily Friday trips, 156 daily Sunday trips, including 156 trips during the Friday peak hour and 156 trips during the Sunday peak hour. Project Trip Distribution Trip distribution is the process of identifying the probable destinations, directions or traffic routes that will be utilized by project traffic. The potential interaction between the proposed land use and surrounding regional access routes are considered to identify the route where the project traffic will distribute. The distribution of the proposed project was based on information received from the Islamic Center Temecula Valley related to current worshiper's zip codes and routes to the site. The anticipated trip distribution for the proposed development is presented on Figure 4-1. This figure indicates the proportion of project traffic that will use the street segments and turning movements indicated. Figures 4-2 and 4-3 indicate the volume of project related traffic increases. Future traffic levels in the project vicinity are expected to be changed by the amounts shown on these figures. KOA Corporation 14 November 2010 ICTV Religious Facilities ESTIPM 3°3 9.0!103 2110° 76, 41" 01 15 e r- tn 9 104 6 3:0) Z Ck z LU LU Distribution Percentage Lfl November 2010 KOA Corporation Walcott Ln & La Serena Wy 12-'' cn N I, ot 82 _do U��pp _V Z �4 c19 0 to azs K a K To us uz Winchester Rd & Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd Nicolas Rd ce)v -13 I r43 v Lic 'a z 0 0 November 2010 <43 KOA Corporation ICN Religious Facilities Wcatt Ln & 2,°Serena Wy 12-'' o as •A� U 2 -di' 2 ',-0Z r89 00 in Generaasl Rd Keamy Rd & Nicol < --56 58—) Winchester Rd & W€nchester Rd & Margarita Rd N colas Rd er X14 7, r44 T � 0 z ILJJ —J Q v cn 0 0 0 November 2010 KOA Corporation 5. OpeningYearWithout and With Project Conditions This section documents the expected effect of the project upon opening year conditions in the study area with added ambient growth. Traffic growth in the study area has historically increased at a rate of about 2% per year. Future increases in the background traffic volumes due to regional growth are expected to continue at this rate in the vicinity of the project. Assuming an opening year date within 3 years, the existing traffic volumes were adjusted upward by 6% (2% per year) to reflect area wide growth. For the purposes of this traffic study, it was conservatively assumed that both phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2) of the project are completed under "With Project" conditions. Peak Hour intersection Level of Service Figures 5-1 and 5-2 illustrate the opening year without project peak hour traffic volumes. Figures 5-3 and 5-4 illustrate the opening year with project peak hour traffic volumes during the Friday and Sunday peak hours, respectively. Table 5 displays a comparison of existing scenarios for opening year without and with project conditions. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix D. Table 5 Friday/Sunday Peak Hour Intersection Performance Opening Year Conditions Without and With Proiect Intersection Opening Year Without Project Opening Year With Project A Delay Significant S Delay LOS Delay LOS Friday Peak Hour I. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 162.3 F 162.4 F 0.1 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 203.7 F 209.0 F 5.3 _ Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 37.5 D 39.7 D 2.2 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.0 A 15.8 C 15.8 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 10.5 B 10.8 13 0.3 No Sunday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 57.1 E 58.2 E 1.1 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 65.7 E 69.2 E 3.5 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 33.9 C 31.6 C -2.3 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.1 A 2.8 A 2.7 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 8.6 A 8.8 A 0.2 No vciay oases on seconas per venicte average. *Unsignalized Intersection As shown in. Table 5, study area intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service (LOS D or better) except for the following intersections, which continue to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service: • Winchester Road & Nicolas Road for Friday & Sunday peak hour • Winchester Road & Margarita Road for Friday and Sunday peak hour KOA Corporation 18 November 2010 CO 14- ID (0C) CV OO T CO CO 0(0 ch TE, <-1? (-99 (0 • !- 0.1 CO ▪ CO 1 T`-1.98 9Z6L r901. 1,,‘ ED CO CO ‘-96L f--999 L cal? NY 01 • tO Friday Peak Hour Volumes c LU (.9 LU Nov KOA Corporation Opening Year Conditions fCN Religious Facilities cc 1 esnpalN 311e7 vgnoa ow* WaSerelcott na WLn & La y ``-95 X1 rc,0 46- 3 r c� � 17-y, df 70-0 Acotl al' VZ tn N 1 £ 09. a 2 E -1. n caZ 03 NMN ,) .1, 14, Fl j -L£ N i 6iico„),., n4� Winchester Rd & Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd Nicolas Rd • X417 X141 eon F343o rri m F11 7, T.., y-247%--,- tsi Ni.., r414 143 '-) 10-i 'r"...2 If) -3 464co N 198-,y •T2R1 17-,,, z Sunday Peak Hour Volumes November 2010 fd KOA Corporation Walcott Lna Wyn & La Sere CO o X172 M r. co F77 if -10 1152 'i� 63� °D 41Th 0 0 T o Tz8 23 do _ -u ''-61- CO General Kearny Rd & Nlcolas Rd r -32 co co rn F-467 ,()NT, r6 318✓' 7361 'Ps"' 52� Wcolas Rdinchester Rd & Nl u� '-240 ch 4-75 Z, x505 160,' (":".° 183- •-�� 89-y Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd CO KIc+� r`696 c,i a r~ <-683 ,7T`t ir232 1.45-' 'S r" 233T 6 M November 2010 N KOA Corporation Opening Year Conditions ICN Religious Facilities CC U7Uo�feM esnpaW alis) vgtso3 aiieD 0 Walcott Ln & La Serena Wy to o X172 „ 70 115-'' 63-4 c,.,°° 41y u n Q O �u Z 8 Ns 4.62 rs-61. cL9 amu' S'n ,, .1 ag q,3 +.92 Ncry "01, $P -,i 91.-->f`7nv' LEZ� m _WN Winchester Rd & Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd Nicolas Rd -696 u, X240 co v 1.++ E-683 ro N X75 r232 cz, r505 145-'' 6bto 160-'1.1(T 3 623- ro r o> 183-3 o 233 y 't m 89 v a) V Z a) O rclL . O i]I n z 4—I 01 CU L ' 0 SJ co 01 c 0 0 Sunday Peak Hour Volumes November 2010 KOA Corporation 6. CumulativeYear 2013 Without and With Project Conditions Including Roripaugh Ranch Project This section addresses Cumulative conditions in Year 2013 "With and Without Project" traffic in the study area with added ambient growth and cumulative traffic generated by approved or pending projects in the vicinity of the subject property. For the purposes of this traffic study, it was conservatively assumed that both phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2) of the project are completed and all identified cumulative projects including Roripaugh Ranch project would be constructed and operational by the year 2013. Intersection improvements at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road that are provisions of an existing Development Improvement Agreement (DIA) between the City of Temecula and Roripaugh Ranch project are included and assumed to be in place for this scenario. Any traffic issues associated with this location area would mainly be tied to the Roripaugh project. The following are the improvements considered to be in place at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road under this scenario: • Northbound Approach: Widen to provide two left turn lanes, four through lanes, and two right turn lanes • Southbound Approach: Widen to provide two left turn lanes, four through lanes, and one right turn lane • Eastbound Approach: Widen to provide one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane • Westbound Approach: Widen to provide three left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane Any traffic issues associated with the intersection of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road would mainly be tied to the Roripaugh project. In addition, it should be noted that the significant number of pedestrian/students crossing at this location during Chaparral High School's dismissal time (duration is 15-20 minutes), is considered a major contributing factor to the deterioration in LOS at this intersection. Once the school dismissal period is over, the intersection LOS will improve at this location. Future Growth Based on discussions with City of Temecula staff, it has been established that traffic in the study area has historically increased at a rate of about 2% per year. Future increases in the background traffic volumes due to regional growth are expected to continue at this rate in the vicinity of the project. Assuming a 9 completion date within 3 years, the existing traffic volumes were adjusted upward by 6% (2% per year) to reflect area wide growth. Future traffic increases can also be forecast by considering additional traffic that may be generated by other developments that have been approved in the area. There are several projects near the site that will add cumulative traffic to the intersections analyzed in the study as shown in Table 6. KOA Corporation 23 November 2010. ICN Religious Facilities Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions (Including Roripaugh Ranch Project) Table 6 Cumulative Projects (Including Roripaugh Ranch Project) Project Name Size Land Use Location Number Kingdom Hall of Jehovah Witness 8,264 Square Feet Religious Institution I Saraphina 67 Single Family Homes Single -Family 2 Roripaugh Ranch 2,015 Single Family Homes Single Family Residential 3 AM/PM Car Wash 946 Square Feet Commercial Gas Station Car Wash 4 Walcott Estates 45 Single Family Homes Single -Family 5 The trips generated by these cumulative projects are included in the future forecast. Cumulative project information is compiled and shown in Appendix E. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service To forecast the future growth conditions for the year 2013, the peak hour volumes in Figures 3-2 and 3- 3 were increased by 6% per year and traffic from the list of cumulative projects was added. Table 7 summarizes the results of the LOS analysis for this scenario Figures 6-1 and 6-2 illustrate the Friday and Sunday peak hour volumes for Cumulative Year 2013 without project conditions (including Roripaugh Ranch Project)". Figures 6-3 and 6-4 illustrate the Friday and Sunday peak hour volumes for cumulative Year 2013 with project conditions (including Roripaugh Ranch Project)". The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix F. KOA Corporation 24 November 2010 ICN Religious Facilities Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions (Including Roripaugh Ranch Project) Table 7 Friday/Sunday Peak Hour Intersection Performance Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (Including Roripaugh Ranch Project Intersection Cumulative Year 2013 Without Project Cumulative Year 2013 With Project 4 Delay Significant $ Delay LOS Delay LOS Friday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 181.7 F 186.3 F 4.6 Yes 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 118.3 F 123.3 F 5.0 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 41.5 D 42.5 D 1.0 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.0 A 66.2 F 66.2 Yes 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 13.4 a 14.1 B 0.7 No Sunday Peak Hour 1. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 63.6 E 64.1 E 0.5 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 54.5 D 55.0 D 0.5 No 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 25.9 C 24.6 C -1.3 No 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.1 A 1.9 A 1.8 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 10.2 B 10.5 B 0.3 No ote:_ uetay based on seconds per vehicle average. * Unsignalized Intersection As shown in Table 7, the following intersections are forecast to continue to operate at unsatisfactory levels of service and experience a significant impact under Cumulative conditions: • Winchester Road & Margarita Road for the Friday peak hour • Winchester Road & Nicolas Road for Friday peak hour • Nicolas Road & Calle Colibri for Friday peak hour k should be noted that the significant number of pedestrian/students crossing at the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road during Chaparral High School's dismissal time (duration is 15-20 minutes), is considered a major contributing factor to the deterioration in LOS at this intersection. Once the school dismissal period is over, the intersection LOS will improve at this location. The increased delay with project conditions at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri is primarily attributed to the increased vehicular volumes generated by Roripaugh Ranch and introduction of side street traffic from the project waiting to access Nicolas Road. KOA Corporation 25 November 2010 0 0 0- a -c tus a 0 re no c v c C 0 0 u 0 sls tis A 3 ICN Religious Facilities -CC a a srt esnpaW allJ uggoa all a M1 M O_ ,7E .4 , (-a 691.-'' •E 144 -01 33 ZS �{`r N vi O N. -Ola T N. V 2 dZ , cn lob tif CZ N-03,— X91 a K -9g E Til. 9 4-a wZlln 6EZ c+, rn CO - C -LLS r'n <-1792 as 4) 1 C x904 geav LOPS' r°C 69E4--> i? T' wmm §z III Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd �0 r716 m 21:.3 F-683 r232 161- 623-1 cesj 0,, 233-y °w - E November 2010 co {6 0 co N lL C 1 0 C U Q1) L . l2 a.-1 O en a-+ a) Friday Peak Hour Volumes O ncluding Roripaugh Ranch Project) ative Year 2013 Conditions ICTV Religious Facilities J J it QsnpaW all�D 11 ugs�ua a{IBJ 11 Walcott Ln & La Serena Wy N ``-98 L (-122 90-4 Tm 17,, as r 84 Yla 1520 Ln 1 L£ • T4:3) O N a'a�c mr,M cg c92 N N -71 <-C ra 8C z04 -y � r Wsnt cochlas erd az. Rd NiesR x`-176 ,;(7.A1<-11 r604 i 10j • 7-3 vrm i17-1 11'2,. ch 31 mM,— N 7 AV; J 1 4, 'Luz <-1--L6es (-961. 9692 9692n�ao �a)rn Sunday Peak Hour Volumes IL! (D uJ J November 2010 KOA Corporation w d 0 0- -C u c Le t 40 d Ce b0 cC c 0 0 u 0 cY m rd CCTV Religious Facilities J 47 A0)1eM esnpayd a41) vggna 21t,r) 0 WalcSereott na Ln W& y La +n —1X181 34 162' 141 v41- _vo flZ mo 1 04 l' CL9 7 K al I+ Ste] - "91H .1 y E-# 3.0 ce w� 9s__/' 9k4 '`i T MOi L9Z Winchester Rd & Ni 1 vr (-75 7T. f657 160 ,1. (" 183- oac 89Th N Winchester Rd & Margari 'coNt- 716 0,[0 F-683 r232 161J T cf: 623—> 233 r' (1) z to 4L CUas L mom' E 3 c a.i O a=+ -0 c O v 11 m N s,. Q1 sll a:+ ts7 7 U Friday Peak Hour Volumes 0 November 2010 CO N KOA Corporation tT N O N O y uric 01 NC. N 8£, za4-� 0 F'£ r4 T rn (-49 T � a co r"-64 cLe , •:1C a -c, 414,5 965-r 449 `s-Z4Z -4Z04 c864 N SCO Sunday Peak Hour Volumes 0 November 2010 N KOA Corporation 7. Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project Conditions Excluding Roripaugh Ranch This section addresses Cumulative_ Year 2013 "With and Without Project" traffic conditions, excluding Roripaugh Ranch, in the study area with added ambient growth and cumulative traffic generated by approved or pending projects in the vicinity of the subject property. For the purposes of this traffic study, it was conservatively assumed that both phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2) of the project are constructed and all identified cumulative projects would be constructed and operational by the year 2013. The existing traffic volumes were adjusted upward by 6% (2% per year) to reflect area wide growth. The following cumulative projects shown in Table 8 were added. Table 8 Cumulative Projects (Excluding Roripaugh Ranch Project) Project Nae Nan -le Size Land Use Location Number Kingdom Hall of Jehovah Witness 8,264 Square Feet Religious institution l Saraphina 67 Single Family Homes Single -Family 2 AM/PM Car Wash 946 Square Feet Commercial Gas Station Car Wash 4 Walcott Estates 45 Single Family Homes Single -Family 5 The trips generated by these cumulative projects are included in the future forecast. Cumulative project information is compiled and shown in Appendix E. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service To forecast the future growth conditions for the year 2013, the peak hour volumes in Figures 3-2 and 3- 3 were increased by 6% per year and traffic from the list of cumulative projects was added. Table 9 summarizes the results of the LOS analysis for this scenario Figures 7-1 and 7-2 illustrate the Friday and Sunday peak hour volumes for "Year 2013 Without Project (excluding Roripaugh Ranch)" conditions. Figures 7-3 and 7-4 illustrate the Friday and Sunday peak hour volumes for "Year 2013 With Project (excluding Roripaugh Ranch)" conditions. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix G. KOA Corporation 30 November 2010 ICTV Religious Facilities Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions (Excluding Roripaugh Ranch Project) Table 9 Friday/Sunday Peak Hour Intersection Performance Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (Excluding Roripaugh Ranch Project) Intersection Cumulative Year 201 3 Without project Cumulative Year 20 13 With Project A Delay Significant & Delay LOS Delay LOS Friday Peak Hour . Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 162.6 F 162.8 F 0.2 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 206.4 • F 212.8 F 6.4 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 38.6 D 40.1 D I.5 No 4_ Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.0 A 19.0 C 19.0 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 10.8 8 11.2 B 0.4 No Sunday Peak Hour 1_ Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 57.8 E 59.4 E 1.6 No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 67.2 E 73.0 E 5.8 Yes 3. Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 32.1 C 29.9 C -2.2 No . 4. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.1 A 2.8 A 2.7 No 5. Walcott Ln & La Serena Way* 8.8 A 9.0 A 0.2 No i.oiar ua�ea on secanas per venicie average. * Unsignalized Intersection As shown in Table 9, all study intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service (LOS D or better) except the following intersections, which will continue to operate at unsatisfactory levels of service under Cumulative conditions, excluding Roripaugh Ranch: • Winchester Road & Nicolas Road for Friday & Sunday peak hour Winchester Road & Margarita Road Friday and Sunday peak hour It should be noted that the significant number of pedestrian/students crossing at the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road during Chaparral High School's dismissal time (duration is 15-20 minutes), is considered a major contributing factor to the deterioration in LOS at this intersection. Once the school dismissal period is over, the intersection LOS will improve at this location. The increased delay with project traffic at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri is attributed to the introduction of side street traffic from the project waiting to access Nicolas Road. KOA Corporation 31 November 2010 0 V OC s 00 0 d L 0 Ce b0 C 7 u 1.15 4� C 0 C O M O N 4 li{ Ol r n J Walcott Ln & N r• 0, %-175 •JJ.� (p 163—) '14:14' 41Th .17 =2 U m siz ;.TA T T W Winchester Rd & General Kearny Rd & Nicolas Rd Nicolas Rd in co '`239 X33 o4 m75 75 ch coo <-435 J ., ('477 ,1 T. r7 w 1602 E 318-'1 71, T r 183-) ,-570" 718 �;7 2 89- s 82-,,, Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd co co co '-697 w co r- <-683 i-232 146-'' T C 23CO 3 v cu O In z Q1 E O O co t) (13 LL rti O A.__ fll 13 0 r4 G1C A a1 w D a1 , 6L X LI/ O U a) 'o a 0 Cr) 0 (NI L cls r v U Friday Peak Hour Volumes 0 w mb 0 z KOA Corporation WalSerecott na WLn & La y to X98 .hZ <10 46—> to t'7 cii a� 43 aO MY To ErE Ic M N d. Emco a ) .L L (-4 els E : 6VA �ul ti- aZO b-,, s '1n� 03Nth Winchester Rd & Nicolas Rd X161 0¼ <-11 j, L X438 102 eco aio d 7-) ttco-4- 1 7Thi 17T MaWinchesterRRd d & Margarita f°C-418 YrFA` <-343 � L'-247 144, T 464—) co r N 198-t,Y' w Sunday Peak Hour Volumes November 2010 en KOA Corporation j • Walcott Ln & i La Serena Wy t€, T\--1231 v to 4--77 c e-10 1232 4c1:3°' 63—) 41-y Calle Colibri & Nicolas Rd 4-533 r20 641-) �� 59Th in F2 °ce =o V OZ N �y� TH,1, c9S 9�°N- sz ") " Md ai ce i i'l CGi ..±. N OS`LEti ��N ,5,4"117 1N . `�, 9z6� �9a� c017 -a 96Zk3 mmm ,--, N Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd T`-697 c0.1 cO 4-683 T. r232 1462 dao M cn' 623-4 a z a.) 0 z uJ C9 uJ Friday Peak Hour Volumes 0 November 2010 KOA Corporation Sunday Peak Hour Volumes uJ U LLJ J November 2010 KOA Corporation 8. Impacts and Mitigation Significant impacts Traffic impacts are identified if the proposed project will result in a significant change in traffic conditions on a roadway or intersection. A significant impact occurs when project related traffic causes LOS at an intersection to deteriorate below the minimum acceptable level by a measurable amount. A cumulative impact may also be significant if the intersection is forecast to fall below the minimum acceptable level of service due to the addition of cumulative traffic and project related. According to the City's General Plan, a project significant impact occurs when the vehicle delay is increased by 2.0 seconds or more at an intersection operating at LOS E or F. For the purpose of this report, all intersections along Winchester Road and Nicolas Road shall comply with the City of Temecula General Plan requirement of LOS D or better.. Unsignalized intersections are considered to be impacted if the LOS is poor and delay is increased significantly. If signals are not warranted, mitigation measures other than signalization may be considered to improve the operation of the stop control. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix H. Mitigation Mitigation measures are required if approval and construction of a project results in a significant increase of delay to unsatisfactory LOS. Mitigation measures are also appropriate if cumulative traffic conditions result in an unsatisfactory LOS and the proposed development contributes to these conditions. Recognizing that LOS and delays at intersections along Winchester Road are currently operating less than satisfactory, the City of Temecula has initiated the implementation of an Adaptive Traffic Signal System to mitigate conditions. The adaptive system monitors traffic flows system wide and adjusts traffic signal cycle lengths to address the changes in traffic flows, minimize delays, and improve system progression. By virtue of this continual monitoring, intersection LOS is improved significantly, typically by 10 to 15 percent. The implementation of the adaptive system will be completed by April 20! 1. Given the April 201 1 implementation date, the project traffic was evaluated utilizing the Adaptive Traffic Signal System as a tool for mitigating impacts for each of the scenarios evaluated. Opening Year Conditions The intersection of Winchester Road & Nicolas Road is expected to operate at an unsatisfactory LOS in the Opening Year With Project Conditions. Below is a discussion of the required mitigation measure for this intersection: Winchester Road & Nicolas Road { The LOS at this location is deficient due to the heavy traffic volumes combined with the significant number of students crossing at this location during Chaparral High School's dismissal time. The delay and LOS at this intersection can be mitigated by implementing the City of Temecula's Adaptive Traffic { Signal System.: Table 10 below shows the LOS for the intersection if the above mitigation measure is implemented. KOA Corporation 36 November 2010 ICN Religious Facilities Impacts and Mitigation Table 10 Level of Service Analysis for Opening Year Conditions with Mitigation Intersection Opening Year Without Project Opening Year With Project d Delay Opening Year With Project With Mitigation - Impact Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Friday Peak Hour 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 203.7 F 209.0 F 5.3 184.! F No Sunday Peak Hour 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 65.7 E 69.2 E 3.5 62.! E No Winchester Road, at the intersection of Nicolas Road, will continue to operate at LOS F with the proposed mitigation; however, as shown in Table 10, the implementation of the adaptive traffic signal system reduces the delay and project impact to less than significant and improves the overall intersection LOS to better than with and without project conditions. It should be noted that the significant number of pedestrian/students crossing at the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road during Chaparral High School's dismissal time (duration is 1520 minutes), is considered a major contributing factor to the deterioration in LOS at this intersection. Once the school dismissal period is over, the intersection LOS will improve at this location. Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions (Including Roripaugh Ranch Project) The intersections of Winchester Road at Nicolas Road and Margarita Road, and Nicolas Road at Calle Colibri are expected to operate at unsatisfactory LOS in the Cumulative Year 2013 With Project Conditions. Below is a discussion of the required mitigation measures for these intersections: Winchester Road Margarita Road The LOS and delay at this location is deficient due to the heavy traffic volumes combined with Chaparral High School's related pedestrian and vehicular traffic during dismissal time. The delay and LOS at this intersection can be mitigated by implementing the City of Temecula's Adaptive Traffic Signal System. Winchester Road & Nicolas Road The LOS at this location is deficient due to the heavy traffic volumes combined with the significant number of students crossing at this location during Chaparral High School's dismissal time. The delay and LOS at this intersection can be mitigated by implementing the City of Temecula's Adaptive Traffic Signal System. Nicolas Road & Calle Colibri This location is expected to operate at unsatisfactory levels of service based on the delay cause by the heavy traffic volumes on Nicolas Road. The LOS can be improved and the delays mitigated by constructing the project's required frontage improvements including a two-way left -turn lane on Nicolas Road adjacent to the project. KOA Corporation 37 November 2010 ICTV Religious Facilities Impacts and Mitigation Table I 1 below shows the LOS for the intersection if the above mitigation measures are implemented. Table 1 I Level of Service Analysis of Mitigation for Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions Including Roripaugh Ranch Project Intersection Cumulative Year 2013 Without Project Cumulative Year 2013 With Project Ma y Cumulative Year 2013 With Project With Mitigation Impact Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Friday Peak Hour I. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 181.7 F 186.3 F 4.6 126.E F No 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 118.3 F 123.3 F 5.0 81.8 F No 3. Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri* 0.0 A 66.2 F 66/ 5.3 A No ntersecLon The intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri will operate at an acceptable LOS if the recommended improvements are provided. Winchester Road, at the intersections of Margarita Road and Nicolas Road, will continue to operate at LOS F with the proposed mitigation; however, as shown in Table 11, the implementation of the adaptive traffic signal system reduces the delay and project impact to less than significant and improves the overall intersection LOS to better than with and without project conditions. Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions (Excluding Roripaugh Ranch Project) The intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road is expected to operate at an unsatisfactory LOS under this scenario. Below is a discussion of the required mitigation measure for this intersection: Winchester Road & Nicolas Road The LOS at this location is deficient due to the heavy traffic volumes combined with the significant number of students crossing at this location during Chaparral High School's dismissal time. The delay and LOS at this intersection can be mitigated by implementing the City of Temecula's Adaptive Traffic Signal System. Table 12 below shows the LOS for the intersection if the above mitigation measure is implemented. KOA Corporation 38 November 2010 ICTV Religious Facilities Impacts and Mitigation Table 12 Level of Service Analysis of Mitigation for Cumulative 2013 Conditions Excluding Roripaugh Ranch Project Intersection Cumulative Year 2013 Without Project Cumulative Year 2013 With Project d Delay Cumulative Year 2013 With Project With Mitigation Impact Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Friday Peak Hour 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 206.4 F 212.8 F 6.4 190.7 F No Sunday Peak Hour 2. Winchester Road & Nicolas Rd 67.2 E 73.0 E 5.8 , 65.0 E No Winchester Road, at the intersection of Nicolas Road, "will continue to operate at LOS F. However, as shown in Table 12, the implementation of the adaptive traffic signal system reduces the delay and project impact to less than significant and improves the overall intersection LOS to better than with and without project conditions. City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The City's Capital Improvement Program has several infrastructure improvement projects underway to accommodate the growth and volume of traffic generated by business and recreation areas. The following are three major infrastructure improvement projects planned in the City of Temecula: French Valley Parkway/l-15 Overcrossing and Interchange Project provides for construction of a new freeway interchange on the 1-15 between the existing Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/1-215 freeway split. The project includes the construction of a freeway overcrossing, collector/distributor (CD) lanes, construction of braided ramps between Winchester Road and the proposed new interchange for both the northbound and southbound directions, and the construction of a by-pass exit ramp southbound north of the 1-1511-215 freeway junction to French Valley Parkway. The construction of the French Valley Parkway will reduce delays and alleviate current LOS deficiencies along Winchester Road. The construction of this facility will redistribute traffic within the circulation system thereby offsetting the proposed projects impacts at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. French Valley Parkway (Date Street), Winchester Road (SR79 North) to Margarita Road will widen the current arterial from two to four lanes and is being constructed by the cities of Temecula and Murrieta. The widening and extension project will complete the connection between Interstate 15 and Winchester Road (SR79 North) at Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Butterfield Stage Road will extend from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Rancho California Road. The extension will provide a north -south link between Temecula and Murrieta. Drivers will be able to travel up Butterfield, and then turn left on Murrieta Hot Springs to enter Murrieta. When completed, Butterfield will have two lanes in each direction with a raised center median. KOA Corporation 39 November 2010 ICTV Religious Facilities Impacts and Mitigation The improvements listed above will help alleviate roadway congestion and improve intersection LOS along Winchester Road. It is anticipated that approximately 20-30 percent of the existing and projected daily and peak hour trips will be diverted to the newly constructed roadways listed above. Diverted routes are roadways where trips will divert from an existing congested roadway facility to access newly constructed streets that connect to main roadway arterials or regional freeway facilities. For example, the existing trips that currently access the 1-15 through the Winchester Road interchange will divert from their normal route with the construction of the French Valley Parkway/1-15 Overcrossing and Interchange project. The resulting diverted trips will create a decrease in the traffic volumes along Winchester Road. KOA Corporation . 40 November 2010 9. Project Access and Internal Circulation The project proposes to take access to the roadway system at one location along Nicolas Road. Daily traffic volumes were evaluated at the project access points to determine if there is need for signalization. Accepted traffic signal warrants are not met for the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. Traffic controls should be adequate with the current stop sign control and the recommended improvements identified in the previous chapter including the following: • Eastbound Approach: As part of the project frontage improvements, project shall restripe Nicolas Road to provide a two-way left turn lane. The proposed project shall be conditioned to construct the recommended improvement at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, satisfactory to the City Engineer. KOA Corporation 41 November 2010 10. Conclusions The City of Temecula is evaluating the development of a proposed Islamic Center religious facility located on the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. The project site is currently vacant. The project will generate a total of 472 average daily trips (ADT) on Friday and 156 ADT on Sunday, including 156 trips during the Friday peak hour and 156 trips during the Sunday peak hour. KOA Corporation's analysis finds that the traffic impact of the project has no adverse effect on the surrounding street system with implementation of the identified mitigation measures, which include the following: • Project shall restripe eastbound Nicolas Road at Calle Colibri to provide a two-way left turn lane. KOA Corporation 42 November 2010 • APPENDIX A Traffic Count Data (August 2010) KOA Corporation November 2010 tia a arch rc0 M 'o S Y z= ma as 0 rc me r a' W t 0 0 ZO Y s 2 i r 2 2 gra ' N N N ae 0 Era 0 00 &a r= s 0 1 0 3 F n Peak Hour Data MARGARITA RO 0) In Tolal 406 iT0)I 1 29261 MTO�Eliil I 41 f,l phi TV 1 by 100 Peds Peak Hour Elogirtoel 55:0 1Vc .Pad [s 111 10 1 Imz ILi .a AIM ul 02Vlt)90Wl 20 6 a 12 � a gw 2 9 m n C b w a V N E41,7,e' N mvi 1:32g;_ <^cV 0000 2a F a M0 G s o00 A 0 a a. w. 1-0 .0 w0 01 2 0 mT mm 77 3 al w. am wm =0 22 }11 (k C.) # 3 g q§3!i !e„ 01. .419 476 .724 !r!E 0 �$ 1k +111 1 11 1LIC CRI &® B2 0 W. wc 2. ■- st ri o 3 ! ! f VI N 00100 n ,o O`w Ulu 0 } z° W 0 z K C U 2 7 n 3 m VI n � n uTu .n a a ca .0 AI WI A NI - ab. O.mG r 6 Q a Peak Hour Data ry A ry ,71... '",-.7,1M M O n Rh rozi N = NICOLAS RD Eastbound y00r.N jg gtg OON .14N +o rgrv. mwn ..N Nv w N GENERAL KEARNY RD Northbound Un Thar [ mast I Peds 8 1 0 0 12 3 0 0 1• 2 2 0. . 5 1 [ 0� odr cm c.1 N^oNH 20M .e ..,. . w -+n rdr rrrV'C Nmn m N c m a G h '''' NICOLAS RD Westbound • ten MISI J�9m1=1:01 0 66 2 0 I 46 4 0 0 74 7 0 0 60 6 .0 ONr m,.. -,N 1.1m�O.N ..... H H M V- r a sIzn N m o N n v . A .o ry b N 00 N GENERAL KEARNY RD Southbound telt 1 Thn j Right 1 Ped. D 0 15 0 4 0 27 0 2 0 30 0 3 l 3.7 0 000 Nv.e QMOO mcu,0 0-.0 00-N nnOm .. AAA,M r r G O n e+. . m A. Al 'fr.," MA.A V M1Nm �0..---rM� O. 2On.T Gngv Cotal Grand Total Apprch Total % S 22 00 S 3 09 4-6 2 lam CoMg Iu fi _I J° 0Z 0 "g 00 00 00 00 vg 00 0 O 10 X{ 2 22 22 09 22 22 N 5 0 U 0 s m 0 W 000 $$n gEig- Emma. ZUOZ m e m w memo_ a` d 0 Z Iz a my c U 1U.0 Jo 0 00 0 m 2 i a L 0 N 2 a • 2 a e 3 2 3 00000000 0000 ntiw 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 .041,0 0000 0000 0000 000 O 0000 O O O — b wpicz Wm 7W F. O. Um WM r 2� teE 1-0 wr xr 00 0 B 2 0 W. wo )CO 3 | 2 ! o §7E§ 0 _ \�"LIED _ MhPW ZZ 2 | h oh 1 r. co 3 03 gg }) 2 ) 0 =0 } 741 E 000 !■ ! 0000 06 e; em # f 0 ceg ik Ow 0. 10000 3 � � ZZWS MZ OD Mr 011 k0 0 kw §z )k ■i k 2 }w grin`; 23,-@ §§qk2 M )k 07 ND 0 CV— o 2-.000 � —000 O. NDO sp a. wWN K2 M 7 52 u� y7 3 mm 0 O V J al N �n v m a1 3 z 1 d 2 3 0000 m q 4 0000 o N m N.00 0000 0000 Ng 0000 0000 404 O O o 0 00 ra 00 2.000 .:m r q0 0 0 0 sx r O o g 0 $9 LL300o0 00 0 a 00 W 0 52 0'J a UIY Z 0 C 4D 00 u z 3 2 L d tt 0000 a0 0 0000 00-,0 0000 00040 .0 . 0 00000 .0000 000 3 1 0000. 0000 0000 0000 .444 4000 O 00000 00000 400 0 40000 00000 000. A a 3-01 j— z mr Vaca" 0.22 oEg LA SERENA WAY 04t In Total L 1591 it -fl 31 11 mmairinewl qhL j Let Pnd /111: area 1ELC 1 L92L I f AtlMN3lf3 tl5'K1 iO ry O m N m �o em000 se— o No En i d a O m co 0 m J W LL1 000 ZZa°i t 43 c c c O c _c 2 ▪ Q¢� W aa) m N oVICC ttttt'' 11:1 m LEI 1— • mru a 0) Change Record m O T 0 • • 0 r 0 T 0 O. 0 0 Ti7 7ti E d (Red Lock I O } EV -A Clear (Ped Recall 1 m citN CO Red Rest 1 'Dual Entry Max Recall [Soft Recall 1 2 'Cond. Service CO c as t O y First Phases o C7 Ie) C 0 0 0 T p0 O 0 4 m iv' Opppp)-'N F � L 00030 O o 0 • r- 001000,-,-,-NNpaooCio a com O us 14.: U.:10aD c 0 O O LO l"' oi CO a a C 0 0 o h 0 0 0 0 N { j �y O 0 • o 0 Ii [i IL ✓ V V O) N 0 0 I1i Ts 0 5 0 } m cC ID co N A A < 0 v v d ID 7 m 5 0) 0 0 ID 2 0 0 G) Ts ID 2 Z 0 A A A ACJ ON -C11[13---0 ++++—m o a a o N vvv Vg o-0 O 73 In M 10 113 Z 0 0 ID E Z m 0 m E Z ID m tn m ID m a) 0 ar 0 m Z U a a 0 at 0 U 0 0 tartigt MragiN 12345678 O O T 0 • • 0 r 0 T 0 O. 0 0 Ti7 TI E d (Red Lock I O } EV -A Clear (Ped Recall 1 m citN [Rest In Walk Red Rest 1 'Dual Entry Max Recall [Soft Recall 1 2 'Cond. Service [ManCntrl Calls 1, O y First Phases O O O T 0 T 0 r 0 T 0 O. 0 0 e 0 tl' Tr w [L m T w7 Et ¢ w EV -A Clear FEV -B Delay EV -B Clear EV -C Deiay- m 0 0 w W IEV-D Delay EV -D Clear RR -2 Delay I [RR -2 Clear . Ij) m 1V7ewEV Clear Qa 0 m 0 m A U) O) m 0 - LL LL V N O u_ ID 0) O. fl cc Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:32 PM It) co0 N0 1� 0 0 iN 0 CV O CV p Ih p vs 4 0 0 0 0 o 0 tl' 0 - 0 0 0 4 V .3-• O 0 In O 4 co uY T an T ill Y o0 N N p CI 000 o o C7 Ie) C 0 0 T p0 O 0 4 0 a Opppp)-'N F � L 00030 O o If • r- 001000,-,-,-NNpaooCio O us 14.: U.:10aD 0 O O LO l"' oi CO a a C 0 o h 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 p 0 0 0 o 0 0 poo 0 T 0 0 q7 p O o In T LC) r Let a= p N p0 N o O o 0 o 0 to i0 6 1-- N Too 000,00000q0 00000) .,. 0 0 In O I10C0In00 o T T r N N p o00IQ o 0 M o Column Numbers ----> Phase Names --1 Ped Walk• IPed FDW c W c 5 (Type 3 Limit 1 ID a ¢ IVeh Extension ro g 2 A c'2 5 5 'Max Limit 2 I Call To Phase 'Reduce By Reduce Every (Yellow Change 1Red Clear fl cc Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:32 PM r0) ew1— z * = Coordination Recall muumuu Plan 1 - Sync Plan 2 - Sync Plan 3 - Sync Plan 4 - Sync Plan 5 - Sync Plan 6 - Sync Plan 7 - Sync Plan 8 - Syne Plan 9 - Sync nnrwri Pr i * NEMA Hold MEMO '''S.'•.- , MEI C1 " 1-• to co 0 os to co cs 10 co 0 0 cm 05 to 0 is 0 0 to r- in Ca 0 ;Exclusive Phases IRR Overlap A - Phases 8 r-.4° c 2 Tecsi tsce c v -c" tr" c ..-cr' c c tr2 2 0 120 84 c, o Lig 24 77 c, o o o co c, ..- o ,..„ - w - in o - ... 4. 20 51 0 a CI 0 0 S6 9l. C °3 Y. .4= 0000000000000000 01 :,... XL 000000t000000000ci ,, ci " 01 r CO 0 10 01 01 a r CI CO 10 Ch r CR a o cr 0 0 ICI • 4') li, 0 r 01 r 18 57 79 0 15 57 erz. CI a r a o 15 255 0 I I —•—= 0 ca 1% tl; c 15 o c'3 cs es 10 tn in o Column Numbers dr% =13 2 = Cycle Length Phase 1 - ForceOff Phase 2 - ForceOff = 4.z• .....-.: 0000 0000 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 =01 LL LL LL LL C) en (0 (0 0000 CO0G1C0 tataaaal _0 .0 = QOO_ Phase 7- ForceOff Phase 8 - ForceOff Ring Offset Offset 1 Offset 2 Offset 3 Permissive Hold Release Zone Offset rf-,t ...11,41vALaa .9F A as a v 0 .c 0. 0 A 0.1 04 CL. V 0 0 19. "rn.F.<-,.=.4.:-. ors 1J - 0 0- 7r. F••• 0 fai A 0 + 0 ÷ 0 v E. c s , 0 1 g 01 i- 0 o Z co zor a) rd 2 (7) 7 1 t4 E o E - - N n u u 11 4 11 11 u crn =cr 40 40 n co MEI 0 11 Free Lag Plan 1 - Lag Plan 2- Lag Plan 3 - Lag Plan 4 - Lag Plan 5 - Lag Plan 6 - Lag Plan 7 - Lag Plan 8 - Lag Plan 9 - Lag Crinrri Max * Crawl 1 ari * ors 1J - 0 0- 7r. F••• 0 fai A 0 + 0 ÷ 0 v E. c s , 0 1 g 01 i- 0 o Z co zor a) rd 2 (7) 7 1 t4 E o E - - N n u u 11 4 11 11 u crn =cr 40 40 n co ,r... =r, (•1 (13111'1'j CO C•1 Ca r I '°I 11 CO r C•11 " 11\ ..2 E g a ;Exclusive Phases IRR Overlap A - Phases FRR Overlap B - Phases _ RR Overlap C - Phases RR Overlap D - Phases Ped 2P IPed 6P Ped 4P Ped BP Yellow Flash Phases Overlap A -.Phases Overlap 8 - Phases Overlap C - Phases Overlap D - Phases 'Restricted Phases Assign 5 Outputs ,r... =r, CN1 CO I 0.1 i k- .4. ir '°I 11 1 ell Ir C•11 " 11\ ..2 E g a ;Exclusive Phases RR -1 Clear Phases !RR -2 Clear Phases IRR -2 Limited Service 'Prot / Perm Phases 'Overlap A - Green Omit 'Overlap 8 - Green Omit !Overlap 0 - Green Omit 'Overlap D - Green Omit Overlap Yellow Flash IEV-A Phases I EV -B Phases IEV-C Phases I EV -D Phases 'Extra 1 Config. Bits EC Select (Interconnect) 2 EfiZAW:,,e A a) a) 0_ 0 v A 0 LL1 V 0 og 0 A a) OP LU V Revision: 10430 Printed on 09/21/2010 2:32 PM Cr tkl found 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 i 0 0 0 m E M 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 Day of Week a) a) d 0 a 0 ( sr 1 _23456 i j r• n J 1 1 i M N1 4-95)10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cr 0 0 0 0 0 0 ulJd O 000 O 00 OO 0 00 000 0 O a) h, O 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 found 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 i 0 0 0 m E M 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 Day of Week Day of Week] ( sr 1 _23456 i j r• n J 1 1 i M N1 4-95)10 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 laid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 ay F. 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O O oa000Oa0000Ca000o 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 C7 0 0 0 0 0 found 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 i 0 0 0 m E M 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 Day of Week Day of Week ( sr 1 _23456 i j r• n J 1 1 i M N1 iMMJJQ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O us14 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 O O O O O 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E O Cr O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 j- 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 found 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 i 0 0 0 m E M 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 Day of Week m � ( sr 1 _23456 i j r• n J 1 1 found 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 i 0 0 0 m E M 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 Day of Week 0[ v ( sr 1 _23456 i 0i sr r• n J M N1 C7 NJ N N' 'J4O4as Sr C7 Q 0000000OOO meld (0..I- W W CAW 0 0 0 000000 O q3O O -O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E00'00000000000000 f- (0 0 10 O CO O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O s- •- CY O CH 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 m sts A M O a' 0� a -0U it 0 IC o C3 3 cam O 0, v A 0} M a v 0 CP 0 0 ynuoVV 0 0 O JP8), O 0 O ICE© O ar N O 4* n 0 O m 0 N 4* 0 S O 0) id 0 co 4* -o o 2 ts a a � `� n 1-41111 A R - t T° LyQ1 }O 3) 11 17 17 11 71 11 11 11 17 11 11 11 N P7 cpwr, co m<m0 11-A o o m :!%121.." 2 _ m,1acVg2 0118" d Y >Dm _ Swcc 7 N R 0 m 8 xlcm 0ErasgaOm D-4-1,:c�L C�-0m`rm0�LL Q0ammwO bo '$=t -a cnmm»Uu.mmanman Qu unu nnouaunn m -1n8 O .- N l7 '�P f0 n c0 m< m 0 0 W n ii 1<m0 m m 000 81515 11 11 L <00 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:32 PM m u J CO a 0 0 0 SS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' QA a) 0 0 0 N 0 m • ,111 A m 0- V V A IC 0- !L. v a E 1- TB 0 1 0) a) n E z 0 0 4) 0 N co 0 0 a TN" 10E[ o 0 V' m N • 0 o 21 22 23 24 Detector Number � N to NN N M .- N ^°N 27 r,-. . . 332 Input File r N N M M d d W M 1�!+ J . M G) . . Detector Name N N M M d' If) co r, n a0 a, . ; 8, '45E 4 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 c 0 0 0 0 A A A A + M T } k N U + c ❑ + a) V V U) V V (i) 1 1 C C 0 O m CO 0) a c c C O •E ea v CO 0 = o U m L N > > 'a t E la a aF-a 0 0 0 E Z a) ea r 0- 733 m y. m 0 m m a) co i - as !L !L v v 0 0 0 0 m 0 tL 0) a3 rt 0 0 m m 0 O U L c 0 d U 0 0 0 d m a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 E a) 0 N N 0 E 0, m C) 0 E a) U) 0 E m 0 G) 0 E m w a) ❑ E m a 0 0 E a) 1 ao U) 0 E m a 0, A a1 g 0 v N O 0 0 N N U) W €c. Q Q ❑ ❑ V V Ili 0 m m E 0 c E LL u 0 2 Detector Number CO N N N 1.0 N co r r,-. a . 332 Input File ....I D J J -6L 7 J 0 J -9L 1 a . , N N M M d' If) co r, n a0 a, . ; 8, '45E '' 2o [0 Z 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 17 . Tu 0 0 c 0 c 0 0 c 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 c 0 0 a 0 0 0 c . 0 cc A N g 0- V . v V i 4) 0 i 0 tu 0 10 v G) 0 Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:32 PM CO U O con "eot m al CL o�tp�t . 0000 0 0 0 0 C C •0000 0 0 O O q 0.0 0.0 0.0 cF Paae> 10 0 0 0 ,0 0000 C O C d 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 d III S) O O O O C O O 0 O 0 G 0 O O O a O 0 C? 0 0 O a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0.0 1 0.0 - Bank s I 0 • 0000 0 0 0. 0 a,000 0 0 0000 0 Q 0 • 0 0 O .;.r Iii 0000 • 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Q 0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 Phase Timi O o 0 a o 0 0 0 o 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s a 0 0 0 0 0 •0 •Co •Co •0 0000 0 0 a 0CI d 00000 d Column Numbers ---> I E yC IPed Walk IPed FDW Min Green Type 3 Limit f IVeh Extension II 2-s in C 'Max Limit 2 Call To Phase [Reduce By Reduce Every 11 Yellow Change 1Red Clear 11 Phase 1 o�tp�t . o 0 0 0 a 0doo o 0 0 0 0 0 o a Dodo 0 0 0 R. sem, 0 0 0 Co 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 o 0 d 0 E o S) f O 4 0 0 0 d 0 o 0 o 00 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 ,... C 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 O O a 0 0 0 0 I 0 • a,000 c ddd Iii N Q • 0 0 0 0 o O o Co , 0000 Co O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 ; T d• 00.00 N 0000 :i! O 0 0 0 Co 0000 , 0 N 0 M ln o N 0 O O d r Ch 0 0 0 0 ''4. 0 0 0 O O 0 O 4 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O Co O 0 5' O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 C2•• 0 0 O O 0 O d d .mn Numbers ----> Phase Names ---> Ped Walk IPed FLAN Min Green Type 3 Limit Added Initial IVeh Extension Max Gap ) 'Reduce By Reduce Everll (Yellow Change Red Clear CV CO a 8 :a I X22 0 cc 70' O cc x: f 1 o�tp�t 12345678 I 12345678 I 12345678 Al k 3 Ped Omit___ 4 ,-.0 Permit Phases f o 1. Vehicle Call [ Iii N Q 4r rte. MI S , 111 m ; T d• O O N O e' No :i! O n 0 0 @0 O , m Ec0v00 H 0 N 0 M ln o N o P1 , r- .12 r r Ch Fr cQ7. ON's A N Q1 LL .0 Co0 V 09 co 0 t v Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:32 PM 0 CO 43) O '0 0 as O 0 Z O 0 0 z z 0 N z 00 UJ IJJ p2Z phi Z E E E o m• a)Z baa m 'w'T a m U) o • N 2 W 1– a E Z it _N j - c4 0 O z Change Record m 0) 0 A in coo p M [n ID 0 o p COO o WI lid .crIrl Change h Red Lock Yellow Lock a CC I Ped Recall View Set Peds m' 0) 0 'Red Rest 0 Max Recall I [Soft Recall 1 a) u N a 20 u. IMan _Cntrl Calls 1 m m ce d OO.c+f4 r 0 0 0 m C al t 0 M 0 0 0 o ov W • LL o 0 • o 0 + ++ ✓ V V cn 0 In O to co CC 11) CC a CC A A + v v 0 0) c lO 0 ID 15 CO2 AAAA G 0 0 0 C) v v v 0 .fl E z 0 0 0 0 E D Z 0 a`) .o 2 0) 0 r tos 11) 11) a 10 0 E 1- N CG .6. In .11 N 0 N 0 c 10 2 0 as 0 m z 0 12_456_8 1 A in coo p M o I ID 0 o p COO o WI lid .crIrl 0 Permit 1 Red Lock Yellow Lock a CC I Ped Recall View Set Peds CC 'Red Rest 0 Max Recall I [Soft Recall 1 a) u N a 20 u. IMan _Cntrl Calls 1 Yellow Start m ce d 000 1 A in coo p M 0 ID 0 o p COO o 0pN 0 0 RR -1 Delay RR -1 Clear of N 0 Q 1.1.1W EV -A Clear EV -B Delay EV -B Clear FEV -C Delay EV -C Clear EV -D Delay �al a1 m 0 0 L] N CC RR -2 Clear View EV belay `U 1u 3 S View AR Delay 1 .111 R 3 S A 0 CO 0 U_ V c E 1= E tl01 Phase 1 A co) N p r p 00G 4 N or O N o M p COO o 0pN 0 0 M ui O Z Q V QO M COOO O io 10 10 0*'rlp 1. p OO.c+f4 r 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 o ov o o vv T O p d 0 a C O 0 0 0 C 0 11ir. 0 O O 11f o 0 Q 10 r 1n. r N r o N 10 N O o O 0 0 0 HS !J In O r ,e Cti Ca G CS C 111 1, P? N p O -ON o 0 0 04 o NMM p p C COO 00 10 riO 1n a 110>In poc'o000 u1 iq o ...... r�"lpporri6P. 0 x000.5 N 0.0 °o..a.4.4a'doeo6 00p Opp 0°00.0 Lei 4-c . Up O IO O 0 O 1n r 1n Ci In r 10 C4 10 CV O 04 0 10 rib 10 c E z E IPhase Names ---a Ped Walk Ped FDW Min Green Type 3 Limit tO 0x IVeh Extension 1 Max Gap 0 _E R 'Max Limit 2 j Call To Phase Reduce By 'Reduce Every (Yellow Change I Red Clear A Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:04 PM N t- = Coordination Recall 0 cc 9 7s ktt 111111111111 III Plan 1 - Sync Plan 2 - Sync 'Plan 3 - Sync Plan 4 - Sync Plan 5 - Sync Plan 6 - Sync Plan 7 - Sync Plan 8 - Sync Plan 9 - Sync C:nnrrl PPrt NEMA Hold js,. o o (0O O N c. c1AO O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Exclusive Phases RR Overlap A - Phases O(6 RR Overlap C - Phases C? N 40 Ped 4P O 25 40 0 0 0 0 r N 0 o SI Q N c>na C N Q 0 0 0 a r N o b O NO (GNaOO a O O ._` Out `tel C LO . a CS O r O N too.) O 25 j 40 0 0 0 0 12 255 0 I 100 1 � O co 40 C0 ccsL x 0 0 0 0 �N. US N 0 0 w 0 cl 40 —� 12 O 25 40 0 0 O C? N • O 1 1 o p o 25 1 65 O N R. o 0 0 0 N 255 I 0 .44 . .. C4 Orcp. O N".( O N Q 0 0 0 0 12 I 40 N O Column Numbers ----a Plan Name :.-a Cycle Length Phase 1 - ForceOff Phase 2 - ForceOff Phase 3 - ForceOff Phase 4 - ForceOff Phase 5 - ForceOff Phase 6 - ForceOff Phase 7 - ForceOff Phase 8 - ForceOff Ring Offset - r m 000n N m co m o > H rn E : 'Hold Release m m = O m c N a A CO L7) 0. 0 V N G) co s 0 eF tai Imo: OE rtI NI of 0i Nt COL 01 of of vi Ni co of 01 of of or NI 0f mL aI NI of �aE VI NI oI co `*1 Ni CO of al NI O 0) U LL m LL [�tl N CT - CO ro N (O 0. CO J CrJ CO C J CO o. J cc a J fD Q m J CO CL co (0 m 10 -J Q) A a kcc t C C e R t C C c; 0 N Q 0 0 1- A 0 + 0 = L C. Q C . N n F TJ > m W ` 0 8 W m m O] LL X � C C o o E m— m m.. 1.c 4_ FGO o o}s m Er -0 8 o r-- LT_ mr-4 O Z 11 0 11 11 II 1 11 0 U 1- N CO '7 In CO 1. 03- co 0 m 1-- s D. N L j a o ...gy m m,. ca Cr- aeu v m o.a }O ' 2 N. A a j 11 4• a y 1 r�i § �3 m CI. HQOOa m i 31'-o m m R y Ca QMo6 mi':. arammmm> m W >> a2 f0 Q'O» 8.2 -8 El }-Z dlkl U)f(.m mJ cr1- W W CO0-4 [� 0 8 0 11 8 0 X 0 -0 0 0 C 11111011 V rN CO v 10) (OA90 d N CO) 0 In 031.03 ID = b O o s s E o m 4020E C L57.- 31. AA) LT 0 v N ' N Nas 0 10 A O) ad CL LU V Configuration Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA N O �1 11 0. N� I 1 F w 0 I O r,E N1 Q. 2 L^ E 'Exclusive Phases RR Overlap A - Phases 1RR Overlap B - Phases RR Overlap C - Phases RR Overlap D - Phases I Ped 2P (Ped 6P Ped 4P Ped 8P Yellow Flash Phases II 'Overlap A - Phases II Overlap B - Phases I Overlap C - Phases II 'Overlap D - Phases II 'Restricted Phases f Assign 5 Outputs C L57.- 31. AA) LT 0 v N ' N Nas 0 10 A O) ad CL LU V Configuration Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA N� I 1 F w 0 I O r,E N1 Q. 2 L^ E 'Exclusive Phases IRR -1 Clear Phases I RR -2 Clear Phases RR -2 Limited Service Prot 1 Perm Phases 1 Overlap A - Green Omit Overlap B - Green Omit 1 Overlap C - Green Omit Overlap D - Green Omit 1 Overlap Yellow Flash J EV -A Phases _I IEV-B Phases EV -C Phases EV -D Phases 'Extra 1 Config. Bits___ IC Select (Interconnect) C L57.- 31. AA) LT 0 v N ' N Nas 0 10 A O) ad CL LU V Configuration Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA 0 a 0. 1144 fi u m CD 0 N 0 1asIIO UDId 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m E j- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O a a 0 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Day of Week ]3u° O O o 0 a 0 0 000000000 /Feld 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 0 m E p.-0000000000000000 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m CD 0 N 0 1asIIO UDId 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m E j- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O a a 0 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 II -1011 ID N 0 ro 0 nj 1 1 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O 0 d E h a 0 0 0 a 0 0 O a 0 a a O 0 O O O 0 a O 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 a a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 0 0 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a) m 0 0 12s110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 USId 0 a O O O O 0 a a O O 0 Q 0 Q 0 0) E 1- 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10. r e t, A m ID r 0 v c 0 U Y 17 V 0 1- LDUOyy 0 0 0 JEa� a 0 Aeq 0 0 a m is 0 ld 0-o 2 m 0 N lG 0 2 m iC 0 co ted -a 0 m i mg E E .r .a8= 7, C >, �rn 0 2 a 0 ��Q�'ice 60C) Co n 8 u _n 1 11 A 1 fl 11 11 11 N V2 V' (0DO. f -m 07 10 '68 0 .= O 0 a- m rst 73 n � @- -- 2 ro 0 m m m a U m ° i3 Ra nWm m mr • d Z'timNwL 0m�LL..-▪ F— u- 2 a_� xomm � mc=CCt22`A'sO22 3•-1 % wo¢m cC 2caE:Ty E a L 3 ro 0 0 m m m o m ni m_ . .a �} j a. CL LC07?>�ULLm m frim n u n u n n v u n n I u p u a OS co and co A co m Q CO 0 CO W 0 4 m 0 T5 15 15 000 • 1 u n <00 n w - m m O Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA LDay of Week 1 125110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mid 00000043000000000 00000000000000000 F 00000000000000040 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 II -1011 ID N 0 ro 0 nj 1 1 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O 0 d E h a 0 0 0 a 0 0 O a 0 a a O 0 O O O 0 a O 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 a a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 0 0 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a) m 0 0 12s110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 USId 0 a O O O O 0 a a O O 0 Q 0 Q 0 0) E 1- 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10. r e t, A m ID r 0 v c 0 U Y 17 V 0 1- LDUOyy 0 0 0 JEa� a 0 Aeq 0 0 a m is 0 ld 0-o 2 m 0 N lG 0 2 m iC 0 co ted -a 0 m i mg E E .r .a8= 7, C >, �rn 0 2 a 0 ��Q�'ice 60C) Co n 8 u _n 1 11 A 1 fl 11 11 11 N V2 V' (0DO. f -m 07 10 '68 0 .= O 0 a- m rst 73 n � @- -- 2 ro 0 m m m a U m ° i3 Ra nWm m mr • d Z'timNwL 0m�LL..-▪ F— u- 2 a_� xomm � mc=CCt22`A'sO22 3•-1 % wo¢m cC 2caE:Ty E a L 3 ro 0 0 m m m o m ni m_ . .a �} j a. CL LC07?>�ULLm m frim n u n u n n v u n n I u p u a OS co and co A co m Q CO 0 CO W 0 4 m 0 T5 15 15 000 • 1 u n <00 n w - m m O Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA -1011 ID N 0 ro 0 nj 1 1 1 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O 0 d E h a 0 0 0 a 0 0 O a 0 a a O 0 O O O 0 a O 0 0 O O O 0 O O 0 a a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 0 0 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a) m 0 0 12s110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 USId 0 a O O O O 0 a a O O 0 Q 0 Q 0 0) E 1- 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10. r e t, A m ID r 0 v c 0 U Y 17 V 0 1- LDUOyy 0 0 0 JEa� a 0 Aeq 0 0 a m is 0 ld 0-o 2 m 0 N lG 0 2 m iC 0 co ted -a 0 m i mg E E .r .a8= 7, C >, �rn 0 2 a 0 ��Q�'ice 60C) Co n 8 u _n 1 11 A 1 fl 11 11 11 N V2 V' (0DO. f -m 07 10 '68 0 .= O 0 a- m rst 73 n � @- -- 2 ro 0 m m m a U m ° i3 Ra nWm m mr • d Z'timNwL 0m�LL..-▪ F— u- 2 a_� xomm � mc=CCt22`A'sO22 3•-1 % wo¢m cC 2caE:Ty E a L 3 ro 0 0 m m m o m ni m_ . .a �} j a. CL LC07?>�ULLm m frim n u n u n n v u n n I u p u a OS co and co A co m Q CO 0 CO W 0 4 m 0 T5 15 15 000 • 1 u n <00 n w - m m O Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA 43 0 3 0 0 0 0 0�9 0 0 a 43 4) 0 a 0 CO o 4) 0 a 0 0 o 4) 0 0 0 0 4) O A 4) _a 0 V A LC 2 EL V H 0 i Detector Number 1234 12345678 L° 01 N 1 Detector Numbers r1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 9 10 11 12 -- -- -- -_ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2011 -- 21 22 23 24 i ' 40 1 (NI 0 N 332 Input File CO • N i Detector Number w 00o0a 332 Input File L° 01 N CAM,^ o o 0 N N r m Nr-'- 0 332 Input File r 7_.d7J�„7-17J n1 P1 co C7 — — 40 ID a I - W i 7J G) 0) . Id . 1 1 Detector Name ' d 0 . I i N 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 071-0.1 Fr riligmn A 0A] 0 0 U_+ !L V V 0 a 0 .0 E Z m co ca 4) >- a> m m E 1- } + N 0 0 c V VCO c CCi0 U tlf 1I R d U c 7 a 0) 0 0 Phase Number IT) >- 4) O m m E A A 0 • 0 ✓ V 0 Q 0 4) F I1. 0) 0 4) (C 0 0) A a O 0 0v V. 0 C� G 4, o 0�. cut C�- O D 0 C f D N To . S a 4) n 0 O N OE 0 0 0 0 0 a ❑ E N N Cn 04 0 E 4) 0) M 3fi ❑ E 4) 7 Cn 43 ❑ E 4) (4 0 E 0) CO Cil 4) O N V7 N. 4) 0 4) >. CO co 4k 4) 0 E 4) ) A 4) a 0 0) O 2 4Y E N co a a) t E z 0 4) D C E 1I 11 0 2 0 4- 0 m .00 4L 0 U 2 0 0 _U w 00o0a 332 Input File 1163 1” Detector Name il on iii _U w 00o0a o 0 0 a o 00000codao o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . a" p ,_, 0U ?he '0000000000q000 dao ❑ 0 0 0 o a a 0 0 a o o..a ' d 0 0 41ti, CC Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:04 PM j a_ • z ca cES a_ Ik ... CI r.eaci"c=c"5007c=c 1-• V) 10 Cal 0.5 1 0.0 1.0 <F Paae› -g- : • ea ca co 0 • 0000'” • • • el Ca C3 0 1- VI I -IIA" " 1._ 1 Permit Phases /••• e II•-• 0 Cal ...7, 10 c„.; 0 ui. CI cyi 0 ,,p ca p„. 0 0 I- 6 0 ..z. CI .cil 1 .I. 0000 0 C•1 0 a • 10 • in • In • ps azj 00 III•6 • 0 • 0 • to 1 0.0 na - Bank 1,.• 0 „_ 1.• 0 cv • •I in • tyl 0 • 10 0 • 01 0 azi. 40 ps. 0 0 1- • 0 0 • re• 0 • cr 1 1 ca ea C9 0 CI o UI o WI o 9 o P". 1- Cp Vi 0 0 7; aa ct a•- c! CO 0.0 0.5 0.0 Phase Timi 0 E 43) t-. ... f•-• e l'•••• 0 CI ••• ID • t".7 CI. WI Ct 01 0 ,i. 1;:a p„, 0 0 Ir. • CI 0 • ".- 0 • ch g Q) la 03 CL o 0 ra o • C3 • 0 • C1 • C1 3- 3.0 0 ca • 0 • ,i • 03 Column Numbers ta' E R sz a. 1Ped Walk 1 Ped FDW 2 :•-•,.= o a) T, a IVah Extension 11 1Veh Extension Max Gap • 0_ 40 .E Max Limit 2 II Call To Phase 'Reduce By -11 Reduce Every 11 [Yellow Change 11 'Red Clear 11 Out out 1-• V) 10 Cal 0.0 1 0.5 1 0.0 I 1.0 lank 2 cF Parie E 0 Its e, : • ea ca co 0 • 0000'” • • • el Ca C3 6 ... ci - -., I.: ..„._ -t- ,.:•-, 1 Permit Phases . . 0 C.I ILO 0 S CI CI 1.•. S. Ci 1 .I. 0 0 C•1 0 0 • II) • III - • II) • p, 0 ?OO .0 CI. /.." :2 1"- 4) CM • ••••• criooaso • C•1 • ID • 0.11 cr r. e5 e5 r- Ci 0 Ili 0 a C 1 ERMEMR77 Advance a C3 30 1f) 10 p, ca a••• 0 q 0 E 43) t-. ... 0 el r- ul C1 0 cri 0, csi Q co 1.- el g Q) la 03 CL ,, •. 0 1Ped Walk -1 0 Ped FDW Min Green 0 • 0000l • . ' - tneOcj., 0 0 0 c.i. 6 • G I 4 a. G I 2 LIZI 4- _.i Ea. C -a 1Veh Extension Max Gap • 0_ 40 .E E g IMax Limit 2 Call To Phase 'Reduce By 'Reduce Every 'Yellow Change es a.) -a Wra (Set Dwelt = 255) 0 1:H41 vele. sttitSC cr Out out ,tk 1,---; - E 0 Its e, : • - -., I.: ..„._ -t- ,.:•-, 1 Permit Phases . . 1 .I. -ti 0 rt. . 1‘ I • I ERMEMR77 Advance a t-. ... ,, •. 0 • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. E 0000000.000 • 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 cc •'; 4o` ORM Revision: 10430 Printed on 09/21/2010 2:04 PM LO 0 Id a 31/2010 8:11 0 m rn ca 0 CD 0 C C an al 8 To CD 0 as 0 zz E E ca z 2 N 65 N N 0 LU EU ,.O ZZ Z Z v C C N z C C c o0,0,Z CI fl! F < � U LIU a N or- CI) ?N O W 0 2 0 1— a E N N 1L j,. Change Record 1 0 ID Cam 0 ,- 0 1- 0 e-• 0 1- eo N 1 1 "' i o 07 O O ml "1,+ v Permit 'Red Lock (Yellow Lock I Min Recall PedRecall 1 N Q. . h 0 Red Rest I IDual Entry 1 - N CC Soft Recall N a) . 0 9 c -0• N O First Phases 0 Q 0 0 0 0• L13 0 0 0 00 1- 0 r 0 O m 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 C . 0 0 m O 0 O 0 N 0 N 0 N „y M I Change 0 0 G O O O O cl uq C? `.g 0 CCI a LS A A A w u o 0 • o 0 ui u u ✓ V V y O O 10 N w cc Up a A A m V V a ID N a asc A A A A O * N M O O O O ✓ v v v A m Q E 0 0 N m Q 7 Z m 1V co b 2 m m m ID ams E 1- cc i R N C 0co d is ar azu wpm 1 12345678 1 0 0 ,- 0 1- 0 e-• 0 1- eo N 1 1 "' i o 07 O O ml "1,+ 0 O Permit 'Red Lock (Yellow Lock I Min Recall PedRecall 1 N Q. . h Rest In Walk Red Rest I IDual Entry 1 - N CC Soft Recall N a) . 0 9 c -0• 1Man Ontrl Calls 1 O First Phases o 0 0 ,- 0 1- 0 e-• 0 1- 0 0 o 07 O O 0 O 0 O RR -t Delay FRR-1 Clear EV -A Delay EV -A Clear EV -B Delay EV -B Clear EV -C Delay EV -C Clear EV -D Delay EV -D Clear a m 0 N [X RR -2 Clear 4 W View EV Clear 0 ¢ R S 0 cc a 0 Co V y 0 U- 4) y y t 0 Phase [*- No 1-y +n o 0N 0 0 N o N a M o 07 O O 0 O 0 O 0 e' 0 1— A cd d L.L. ¢ O 0 p o 0 a r cri r a r 0 CS 0 PI O G 0 Q 0 0 0 0• L13 0 0 00 1- 0 r 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 C . 0 0 [1-f O 0 O 0 N 0 N 0 N „y M Lej M 0 0 G O O O O cl uq C? `.g 0 CCI a LS 'K F,r 1.••7 cm 0 O 0 o 0 01 0 .04N a y y 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cll. QGOgQ..r 0 IA 1if"2ir1 rC4 a000a,E CV 0Oao of O 0 co co a O N*- 0 0 4 4 a a 0 0 0 0 Irl r• 0o000NNoain01 0 o O O Le) 0 0 00caO 0 0 10 n Lq E U n k , 2 x Ped Walk (Ped FDW (Min Green I IType 3 Limit Added initial —11 IVeh Extension 11 (} 2 UI `ti IMax Limit 2 Call To Phase fn N = aC 'Reduce Every (Yellow Chang Red Clear MOP Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA N N 10 a 0 1w fq O 1- 0 = Coordination Recall) 0 tQ 0�0( • 4 Q • 1 Ii'iiiiiiiIIIOI 'Plan 1 - Sync Plan 2 - Sync Plan 3 - Sync Plan 4 - Sync Plan 5 - Sync Plan 6 - Sync Plan 7 - Sync Plan B - Sync Plan 9 - Sync (:nnrd Par! * NEMA Hold c C a a wi- 1• Napolra�mo nC�I O EE 20 1 mo 03 11to z U 1 -Of en 0 RR Overlap A - Phases RR Overlap B Phases N4 RR Overlap D - Phases 0c 69 0 CO O 20 59 O la o 0 15 O O .a< N o6f) 09 N O N 2 0 0 V 0 0 15 10 • M M 120 74 0 1013 M n Q 20 59 00.0Q 4 00000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000 120 76 0 r-. O r co co h O 0 r CO O CO h 0 O h w 0 01I A s. :: 4iy .3?R- 0 N 00 O r CO 0 0 r. CO O C O Cr r 1.0 o 0 .YIll N., CO O r N 03 O r 10 a OP 411 0 0 111111611111 ! 255 1 O !t Lu z C a (Cycle Length Phase 1 - ForceOff Phase 2 - ForceOff Phase 3 - ForceOff Phase 4 - ForceOff Phase 5 - ForceOff ! Phase 6 - ForceOff Phase 7 - ForceOff Phase 8 - ForceOff I'D in 0 m -C - hcc To !Offset 2 Offset 3 Permissive m m m 'a 2 IZone Offset A OI 0) Q 0 v COCO Z a 0 0 1) 0 1a (0 U v 0 0 0 • • • r-- 8 8 ti O 0- C 47) 0 0 1— A 0 0 + V v 0 1 F 0 m F 0 1 N ro `m 0 .1; N CO 11 x c m m = r 0.= m o m E `L n 1L 11 a 11 U u e 9 11 CO 4.13 OD ME II III Free Lag Plan 1 - Lag Plan 2 - Lag Plan 3 - Lag Plan 4 - Lag Plan 5 - Lag Plan 6 - Lag Plan 7 - Lag Plan 8 - Lag Plan 9 - Lag (:nnrrl Max * C:nr rrl tarn r-- 8 8 ti O 0- C 47) 0 0 1— A 0 0 + V v 0 1 F 0 m F 0 1 N ro `m 0 .1; N CO 11 x c m m = r 0.= m o m E `L n 1L 11 a 11 U u e 9 11 CO 4.13 OD CE A 0) 0 a. U v A m 1a 0 w v 0 4— 01 0 U A Ae 0 w V 0 a7 C 0 Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:02 PM. nC�I O EE 11to z U Exclusive Phases 11 [RR -1 Clear Phases IRR -2 Clear Phases RR Overlap A - Phases RR Overlap B Phases j RR Overlap C - Phases RR Overlap D - Phases Ped 2P co N a IPed 4P Ped 8P [Yellow Flash Phases Overlap A - Phases Overlap B - Phases !Overlap C - Phases j Overlap 0 - Phases ea a) 40 a Ts m a Assign 5 Outputs CE A 0) 0 a. U v A m 1a 0 w v 0 4— 01 0 U A Ae 0 w V 0 a7 C 0 Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:02 PM. 11to z U Exclusive Phases 11 [RR -1 Clear Phases IRR -2 Clear Phases RR -2 Limited Service Prot / Perm Phases 'Overlap A - Green Omit 11 Overlap B - Green Omit] Overlap C - Green Omit Overlap D - Green Omit Overlap Yellow Flash 11 EV -A Phases EV -B Phases EV -C Phases EV -D Phases Extra 1 Config. Bits IC Select (Interconnect) CE A 0) 0 a. U v A m 1a 0 w v 0 4— 01 0 U A Ae 0 w V 0 a7 C 0 Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:02 PM. CO m 0. 0 ais O c c 0 it. 1.1. Day of Week I 3 T- 4# 4k la NO M It `-al s8s4p0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000000000^3 0 0 0 0 card o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1. Day of Week 3 T- 4# 4k la NO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 as 0 0 '3 •0 "aid 0 0 0 0 N MILO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mid 0 o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 E a o 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000 1.1. Day of Week T- 4# 4k la NO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 as 0 0 '3 •0 "aid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e E F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 Co 0 0 CO 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'ca Day of Weekl C O M m 0 "0 '0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q rai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 E o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'O 0 1 1 0 0 0 card 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m % 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ware x m ar 0 0 ynuoW 0 0 0 !PGA 0 0 0 Apo 0 0 0 ar 0 ctia Q S ar id 0 N 0 1 m 0 co 0 A O pj C + 'aU o.. 0 U 0 n.o 7.. � m .. E `m E E 3 . p O Y C A _ C? O m co lri4.34:7Qmozo V I. 11 11 1 1 0 11 0 n 1 6 11 N cyV u° m r` m m <al0 5 0 c '0 0 0 o m m 2NMOnpj 0. V m .b -- c N y m q C 0 m L , m NL0 m. mm m LLUo4 v`Y c m "= 7,0-822w0-2712 oc m m m g o Ei3ddOo qlz 3 3 ° ET a XE v m y a d E -o QL'p "a �r. 16 0 NC7. Em % V m m m m m m m o m m m J &fl )-76. ��07 7"20[1- 0 (0m CO G] O !I n tt u n 7 II 0 u II II II II ) n II o r"r C] .0 0, m Q°3 U 0 1-L Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:02 PM Day of Weekl C O M 'j7tlllj 0 "0 '0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o E... 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'O 0 1 1 0 0 0 card 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m % 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ware x m ar 0 0 ynuoW 0 0 0 !PGA 0 0 0 Apo 0 0 0 ar 0 ctia Q S ar id 0 N 0 1 m 0 co 0 A O pj C + 'aU o.. 0 U 0 n.o 7.. � m .. E `m E E 3 . p O Y C A _ C? O m co lri4.34:7Qmozo V I. 11 11 1 1 0 11 0 n 1 6 11 N cyV u° m r` m m <al0 5 0 c '0 0 0 o m m 2NMOnpj 0. V m .b -- c N y m q C 0 m L , m NL0 m. mm m LLUo4 v`Y c m "= 7,0-822w0-2712 oc m m m g o Ei3ddOo qlz 3 3 ° ET a XE v m y a d E -o QL'p "a �r. 16 0 NC7. Em % V m m m m m m m o m m m J &fl )-76. ��07 7"20[1- 0 (0m CO G] O !I n tt u n 7 II 0 u II II II II ) n II o r"r C] .0 0, m Q°3 U 0 1-L Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:02 PM or or 0 J O 0 0 0 0 al O (j 0 O 0 Ib 0 O 0 m 0 at, 0 O_ ID 0 0 0_ 46 ID 0 aA) O osW 0 v A ID al a IL v 0 0 m w tioM cm Detector Numbers a m cr !'7 V^ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 4.0 to 21 22 23 24 m N CO N I() N A ID 0- 0- V v v i 04) 4) Detector Number Q3 m oc500 0 0 0.0 0 0 Yellow Chane 0 0 0 0 0000 N V- 1— 0 al O (j 0 O 0 Ib 0 O 0 m 0 at, 0 O_ ID 0 0 0_ 46 ID 0 aA) O osW 0 v A ID al a IL v 0 0 m w tioM cm Detector Numbers a m cr !'7 V^ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 4.0 to 21 22 23 24 m N CO N I() N A ID 0- 0- V v v i 04) 4) Detector Number . .- r 100tW N N o r L0 V OD` cod' N,_mN N N V- 1— a r a 332 Input File N J N M [7 J1) M V'10 -S -S D (O J w D r J 1i m D O) J C) a a Detector .,Name I i I O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0) 0 O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O c 0 O Cc O 0 O c O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 A cJ r 0 0 V V!%) •c 0 0 d m c •i O c Q 0 0 0 Phase Number 0 0 m >ID O m m ID E } • N 00 c ✓ v 0%) O 0)R C 0d C a 0 0 0 .0 E z ID ld m m O m E to h + • + 0 o + + ✓ V 0 0 0 0 ID Ii O) 0 -J m <6 LL O r 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 1 O U m 0 0 a A CO Ca tr; + CO 0 '3 m 70 E O • 3 CD W C 0 Q , a d o � o Q c a $ R N av 0 to a ID (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ID N a 0) a M 0 E ID 7 it 11) m co a U) 4* to E ID a 0) 0 ID >. (1) 0) m a m 14. ID 0 N T Eiga A ID � L ■Q,I O 8 ✓ 0 IT 2 L O L i N m 7 41 . �.. Q) 0 ._ U O E LL 0 O 0o° Ciril C▪ I W • [f_ 0 ✓ v V 10 0 m O Q) 'O 03 n z ., N N (O N o r L0 V cod' N c0 N N V- 1— O) a 332 Input File J -2U N % J -3U 0) V'10 -S -S LJO t '22 I in -a a Detector Name I a 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 ab m O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 alleirMe Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:02 PM LI) rr W M 1 -------, P- C5 "D CD O CD O 04 ca oi CD 44 cp vs cp 0/ 0 0 0 C2 0 CD 0 NT 0 22- 11! 0 0 4, 0 0 41 9 41 cp c) 0 0 0 C1 0 41 I I .,_ up 0 ,- 0 ,- 0q9c:Ro009Rgc: c, ,t .4 ,t us us 4, 0-.0 C! 0 CD CO v• ' 17 CD 10 CD CI • C2 LO • 1- 41 • 1- Ill • 1- c2 ...m N. 0 ..... -• 0 CD CD • CI 0 • C2 CD • CI I.0 . • C7 • ,_ e2 ,,.. ..„ CI 0 CI ri 0 ri 0 ri up 4-, up VD ..... " . " 0 ci 0 ci 0 1 0 L0 0 m) up 0 C: Ift III it: LID 40 0 el g c,C7! cIR ci i• 41 �o CM 1- CD CD 0 CD nf CD nf C2 ni 0 us 0 us CD CD CD CS CI CS C2 It; CI g -CI E c E -. a C2 CD Ul CD 0 CD 41 1- 41 1- If! 1- up VI up 04 CD CD CD CS C2 CS C2 CS 41 CS Phase Names [Ped Walk [Ped FDW IMin Green Type 3 Limit Added initial Veh Extension Max Gap Min Gap Max Limit Max Limit 2 Call To Phase Reduce By Reduce Every [Yellow Change 1 [Red Clear Ch. CO A= 11 P- cp 0/ "D CD 0 CS C1 01 C1 01 C2 c4 c) vs cp 0 c' c' 0 6 0 6 CD ni CD ' i • Ili ez es us ca R 't! ral 41 c) C2 CD CD C1! CD C:,! LID I 20 CC 0 4, C! 0 CI ..i• CI la cl cr. CI ul CI in 4, 4, C! 0 C? 0 CI 41 Ci 1- J 46 1- y- N- VI CO 'D CD 0 6 CS 4 CS Wint4V-K5M Advance 1 0 CD 111 0 CD . NO • 41 • ICJ • up up CD CI 2 2 2 Ict4 i' up CO C4 C2 T- ry -- C2 0,t CI! CI ..4. C:: ..4. CD us CD O .-. -- P, -- Q 6 a 6 C: up C:! t 00000 CD 111 111 1.11 20 up _ a) E F -7- 0 6 CI 6 0 ci 41 6 0 0 g •Z Cb N Z [Ped Walk [Ped FDW Min Green Type 3 Limit Added Initial Veh Extension 2 ca CD [Call To Phase I [Reduce By Reduce Every 1 [Yellow Change 'Red Clear ITNENUMF1 - _ AL1311,-NAN A V as a A w cs) 1. n;$ V (Set Dwell 25g, 4-F PA7. ,•;..53'4.:. :-.42.`•• .1; V t -,..-.2i IP F PAO E 0 a) EL .71 Permit Phases ,.. =._ '5e13 a) > :... 41 Force Off Wint4V-K5M Advance piovi Wit 0 • 000000000000000 _ a) E F -7- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ea = 0 0 0 ca CD A >. 0 0 grilketArIMPVIA A LL _4= 1g 0 V Revision: 10430 Timing Sheet Version: 200 SA & CA Printed on 09/21/2010 2:02 PM APPENDIX B School and Religious Center Schedules KOA Corporation November 2010 Temecula Valley Unified School District Student/Teacher Calendar 2010/2011 School Year = Student Days S M T W TH F S W TH F S 1 ' 2 3 4 (FI) 5 H 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Holidays and Breaks: Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day July 5, 2010 September 6, 2010 November 11, 2010 H - Holidays & School Breaks T - Teacher Preparation Day (K-12 Non -student day: iS - Staff Development Day (K-12 Non -student day) MHhN - Modified Day (6-12 only) HM - Modified Day (9-12 only) w- Work Year Reduction Days M - Modified Day (K-12) EM - Elem. Modified Day (K-5 only) MM - Modified Day (6-8 only) fon-ILS (6-12 anly)Late Start -MSB -IS Sit- Staff Dev & Teacher Prep Day (K-12 Non -student day) Work Year Reduction Days Board Adopted 2/23/2070 (Board Adopted on 210212010) bevaea3-111.2010} 2010 3M OCTOBER APRIL 1'H S M T W TH F S 8 7 8 9 sur 10 T.... 1 : 2 3 .-4 1 .5:'..-6''.'=7` ` 4.-.- _ • .5:. -8- 9 10 'ft:;.T2 - mica . '•33 em '14" • MY ''"15 . MN 16 17 1.8, ' .19r' 20 21 - 22. 23 24 25." MHOS. 26 - 127 -: 'EM ".28 - .'•.-29 . 30 31 Holidays and Breaks: Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day July 5, 2010 September 6, 2010 November 11, 2010 H - Holidays & School Breaks T - Teacher Preparation Day (K-12 Non -student day: iS - Staff Development Day (K-12 Non -student day) MHhN - Modified Day (6-12 only) HM - Modified Day (9-12 only) w- Work Year Reduction Days M - Modified Day (K-12) EM - Elem. Modified Day (K-5 only) MM - Modified Day (6-8 only) fon-ILS (6-12 anly)Late Start -MSB -IS Sit- Staff Dev & Teacher Prep Day (K-12 Non -student day) Work Year Reduction Days Board Adopted 2/23/2070 (Board Adopted on 210212010) bevaea3-111.2010} 2010 3M JANUARY APRIL 1'H F SM 1 T W TH F 8 7 8 9 sur 10 T.... ' 1'1": • 1 H 1 2 3 ` 4.-.- _ • .5:. 6 - -_7 8 9 f0' MHLS •11 '..: .. . 12.::-1-3. -:,.ar _ , _ 14 W 15 16 17:.:'18, ' . _ _ 19::''20::'' =21. - 21 22.. 3fl `•-"° .4: -25:-• ` .28': EN.- .47..";; --f '.:28 -•. 29 Holidays and Breaks: Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day July 5, 2010 September 6, 2010 November 11, 2010 H - Holidays & School Breaks T - Teacher Preparation Day (K-12 Non -student day: iS - Staff Development Day (K-12 Non -student day) MHhN - Modified Day (6-12 only) HM - Modified Day (9-12 only) w- Work Year Reduction Days M - Modified Day (K-12) EM - Elem. Modified Day (K-5 only) MM - Modified Day (6-8 only) fon-ILS (6-12 anly)Late Start -MSB -IS Sit- Staff Dev & Teacher Prep Day (K-12 Non -student day) Work Year Reduction Days Board Adopted 2/23/2070 (Board Adopted on 210212010) bevaea3-111.2010} 2010 3M M APRIL 1'H F 6 1 2 W TH F S 7 8 9 sur 10 T.... ' 1'1": • 1 H 2 3 4 11 5 H 6 H 7 H 8 - H 9 10 . 11 : . 12 ' 13; .-"i4:•, 15 16 17 18:.,'19. ilt•• ' . _ _ .,-20 :EM =21. - _ 22 _ 23 24 • :25, -`20; 27:.. 28 :29 30 Holidays and Breaks: Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day July 5, 2010 September 6, 2010 November 11, 2010 H - Holidays & School Breaks T - Teacher Preparation Day (K-12 Non -student day: iS - Staff Development Day (K-12 Non -student day) MHhN - Modified Day (6-12 only) HM - Modified Day (9-12 only) w- Work Year Reduction Days M - Modified Day (K-12) EM - Elem. Modified Day (K-5 only) MM - Modified Day (6-8 only) fon-ILS (6-12 anly)Late Start -MSB -IS Sit- Staff Dev & Teacher Prep Day (K-12 Non -student day) Work Year Reduction Days Board Adopted 2/23/2070 (Board Adopted on 210212010) bevaea3-111.2010} 2010 3M M AUGUST T W 1'H F 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 sur 10 T.... ' 1'1": • .;71 • -._- 13' . .. .... 14 15 `'.:i."0-.-: .17: ..0'...1V. ' -'f:0 - '2U' 21 22 23..: 'MOBS: "24 .... -.. t25.: -- - :26, ...'=27 • '- •- . .- - 28 29 =..30• .: 31 -- : Temecula Valley Unified School District Student/Teacher Calendar 2010-2011 School Year "'Board Adopted on 2/02a0101 (Board Adoption of "W" Days - 2/23/2040) (Revised 3.19-2010) alendar nates H" w Holidays & School Breaks (K-12) Dates Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Break Winter Break Martin Luther King Jr. Day Lincoln's Birthday Washington's Birthday Spring Break Memorial Day July 5, 2010 September 6, 2010 November 11, 2010 November 22- 26, 2010 Dec. 20, 2010 -January 3, 2011 January 17, 2011 February 18, 2011 February 21, 2011 March 28 -April 8, 2011 May 30, 2011 _ - eac er ' reparation ' ay ' - (Non -student clay) ''S" August 10, 2010 June 6, 2011 - Staff Development Day (K-12) (Non -student day) August 9, 201-0 January 3, 2011 "W" Vflork Year Reduction Day (K-12 & All 1111212010; 1/14/2011; 5/31/11; Employees) (Non -student & employee day) 6/1/11; 6/2/11; 6/3/11; & 616/11 'al" - Modified Day (K-12) May 26, 2011 May 27, 2011 "1=N1" - Elementary Modified Day (K-5 only) Every Wed. starting 8/18/10, ending 5/11/11; (Also: 11/16/10, 11/18/10 & 11/19/10) MM" -- Middle School Modified Day (6-8 only) October 14, 2010 October 15, 2010 MHM" - Middle & High School (includes RVHS) December 17, 2010 Modified Day (6-12 only) March 11, 2011 "HM" - High School Modified Days(9-12 only) September 23, 2010 (includes RVHS) December 16, 2010 III a ala MP at Mt a mama El a MI a ML a IN "MHLS" -- Middle & High School Late Start (6th -8th grades & 9th -12th grades) School Hours: High Schools(8:45am 2:30pm) & Middle Schools(9:15am-2:45pm) School Sites ("MHLS"): CHS GOHS & TVHS (High Schools 8:45am - 2:30pm) and BVMS. DMS, GMS MMS. TMS, VRMS (Middle Schools 9:15am - 2:45pm) Dates ("MHLS"): Middle & High School Late Start Monday DATES: (Dates below are also the same for RVHS "Modified Day" Schedule seen below) 8/23/10, 8/30/10, 9/13/10, 9/20/2010, 9/27/10, 10/4/10, 10/11/10,10/18/10, 10/25/10, 11/1110,11/8/10,11/15//10,11/29/10, 12/6/10,12/13/10,1/10/11, 1/24/11,1/31/11, 2/7/11, 2/14/11, 2/28/11, 317/11, 3/14/11, 3/21/11, 4/11/11, /18/11, 4/25/11, 5/2/11, 5/9(11, 5/16/11, & 5/23/11. School Chaparral, Great alk &moi emecula Valley High Schools Crisis information Line 506-7900 • Page 2 of 2 School Listing Site Elementary Schools_ Alamos Elementary School (AES) Abby Reinke Elementary School (ARES) Ysabel Barnett Elementary School (BES) Crowne Hill Elementary School (CHES) French Valley Elementary School (IVES) Helen Hunt Jackson Elem. School (JES) Susan La Vorgna Elem. School (LES) Nicolas Valley Elementary School (NVES) Paloma Elementary School (PES) Pauba Valley Elementary School (PVES) Rancho Elementary School (RES) Red Hawk Elementary School (RHES) Temecula Elementary School (TES) Temecula Lulseno Elementary (TIES) Tony Tobin Elementary School (TIES) Vail Elementary School (VES) Vintage Hills Elementary School (VHES) Middle Schools Bella Vista Middle School (BVMS) James L Day Middle School (DMS) Erie Stanley Gardner Middle School (GMS) Margarita Middle School (MMS) Temecula Middle School (TMS) Vail Ranch Middle School (VRMS) Phone 284-6780 302-6610 296-5579 294-6370 926-3643 302-5199 294-6385 695-7180 302-5165 302-5140 695-7150 302-5125 595-7130 294-6340 294-6355 695-7140 695-4260 294-6600 699-8138 699-0080 695-7370 302-5151 302-5188 High Schools Chaparral High School (CHS) 695-4200 Great Oak High School (GOHS) 294-6450 Temecula Valley High School (TVHS) 695-7300 Rancho Vista High School (RVHS) 695-7320 (RVHS fp the Joan F. Sparkman Alternative Ed. Center- SAEC Alternative Education Programs Susan H. Nelson High School (NHS) SAEC 695-7360 Temecula Valley Adult School ('NAS) ( D.O. 506-7996 Rolling Hills Academy Horne School (RHAHS) 506-7908 (RHAHS W Joan F. Sparkman Alternative Ee Center- SAEC7 Temecula Valley Charter School 294-6775" Temecula Preparatory School (Charter School) 926-6776` *Cell for Information District Admintstratlon District Administration Center (DO) 676-2661 Transportation (MOT) 695-7110 Maintenance and Operations (MOT) 695-7115 2010-2011 Daily School Schedules Regular Day 7:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. TEMECULA VALLEY unrrld sauna restrict Modified Day 7:30 a.m.-12:22 p.m. Rancho Vista High School Middle Schools 725 a.m. - 3:13 p.m. (flex schedule) .m. - .. pm (ContaGRVAg for a todrbedlaay-Ftex Schedules) (same dates as MI -LS dates) 8:15 a.m. - 2:45 p.m. 8:15 a.m. - 12:25 p.m. Elementary Schools AM Kindergarten PM Kindergarten 8:55 a.m. - 3:20 p.m. 8:55 a.m. 12:22 p.m. Extended DavJ<inder garterr: AES, RES, LES, NVES. RES. ES, TES. VES & VHES Charter Schools 11:53 a.m. 3:20 p.m. 8:55 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. 8:55 a.m. - 11:35 a.m. 8:55 a.m. - 2:10 p.m. (e#mzded day 10ntlergutes schools) 2:40 p.m. - 3:2u p.m. s "MHLS' ! Late Start Mondays 1 (see dates above) ▪ High School: ▪ 8:45am - I 2:30pm J 1 Middle School: 8:55 am. - 1:00 p.m. (extended) i 9:15am - 2:45pm Call School Call School Nicolas Valley Elementary School Schedule ATTENDANCE HOURS Kindergarten - 8:55 a.m. - 2:10 p.m. Grades 1-5 - 8:55 a.m. - 3:20 p.m. Modified Days - Grades K-5 Dismissal 1:00 p.m. DAILY SCHEDULE 8:50 Warning BeII 8:55 School Begins - MI Students 9:05 - 9:35 School -wide Interventions/Enrichment Block 10:45 - 10:55 Snack/Recess - Grades 1, 2, 3 11:15 - 12:00 Lunch - Kindergarten 11:45 - 12:30 Lunch - Grade 5 12:05 - 12:50 Lunch - Grade 4 12:25 - 1:10 12:45 - 1:30 1:10 - 1:55 2:00 - 2:10 2:10 3:20 Lunch - Grade 1 Lunch - Grade 2 Lunch - Grade 3 Snack/Recess - Grades 4,5 Dismissal - Kindergarten Students Dismissal - 1st -5th Grade Students MODIFIED DAY Recess 10:45 - 10:55 12:50 -- 1:00 Lunch 11:00 - 11:30 11:30 - 12:00 11:45 - 12:15 12:00-12:30 12:15 - 12:45 12:30 -1:00 Snack/Recess -- Grades 1, 2, 3 Snack/Recess - Grades 4, 5 Kindergarten Gracie 5 Grade 4 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 RAINY DAY/HOT DAY Lunch 11:15 - 11:45 11:30 -12:00 12:05 - 12:35 12:20 - 12:50 12:40 -1:10 12:55 - 1:25 Kindergarten Grade 5 Grade 4 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Home About Us Connect Coming Up... Missions Youth Group Contact Us Service Times You Are Here » Home \ About Us \ Service Times Join us for either one of our Worship Services: 9:00am - Contemporary - children join adults for the first part of service and then dismissed to theft classe! 10:30am - Traditional - children go directly to their classes in the Youth Center. Junior High Students and 1 except for the first Sunday of the month when they join everyone for Communion. Copyright 2010, Grace Presbyterian Church (PCUSA) Temecula, CA 1 (951) 695-1913 Powerec httpi/www,gracepreschurch.netJcontent.cfm?id=293 8/26/2010 search • Home • About Us» • Ministries» • Media» • About Us » • Our Service Times Parents welcome! "Children are given to parents?' I've said it before and I'll say it again and again. In fact, I try to -preach' • to them the basic idea that if they are not right with their parents, they are certainly not right with their God! That said, I want it to Read More » Latest Slog Posts • Parents welcome! • Further Discussion: the Temecula Mosque and Islam • Another view of some camphQ otos • Pictures and Videos from Camp • New Youth Series Post Archives Select Month Our Service Times Sunday http://www.cbctemecula.org/about usiservice-times 8/30/2010 rta:• �. - Adult Bible Classes 10:00 AM Children's Sunday School 10:00 AM Morning Service 11:00 AM Children's Church 11:00 AM Evening Service 6:00 PM Wednesdays Master's Club Children's Ministry 7:00 PM Evening Service 7:00 PM Loving nursery care provided by trained workers for all services About Us • Home • About Us o Pastor's Notes o Are You Sure About Heaven? o Our Service Times o How to Find Us o Our Staff o What We Believe o Upcoming Events o Contact • Ministries o Bus Ministry o Children's Ministries ■ Sunday School ■ Master's Club o Youth Ministry a Announcements • Bro. Ryan's Notes o Adult Bible Classes N Youth Ministry ■ Merry Hearts • Lively Stones • Fellowship Class • Ambassadors o Music Ministry a Missions o Men's Ministry o Ladies' Ministry http://www.cbctemecula.org/about us/service-tunes 8/30/2010 ',raw r rqy, y bW# Vaa.ia vwi. ... Vlii./v µlLi till t If V.Aa_ 1,/.!i 7 {Vv 1 itzst.., A 446V J VA T o Outreach o Reformers Unanimous o Jail Ministry o Construction Ministry o Upcoming Events • Media o Videos o Pictures WE WOULD LOVE TO HEAR FROM Y4 • Home • About Us • Ministries • Media Copyright 0 2010 Calvary Baptist Church: Temecula, CA - All Rights Reserved CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH 31087 Nicolas Rd. Temecula, CA 92591 Pastor Wm. Rench (951) 676-8700 Quick Contact Form Name Email Message http://www.cbctemecula.org/about us/service-times 8/30/2010 ICTV Opening Day Phase 1 opening date 3 years from issuance of grading plan permit Phase 11 opening date 4 years from opening of Phase 1 ICTV Schedule Monday Thru Thursday:5:30 am -6:00 am and 8.30 pm -9:15 pm Friday: 12:15 pm -2:45 pm Friday: 7:00 pm -10:00 pm Saturday (Last week of the month): 7:00 pm -10:00 pm Sunday School: 9:00 am -1:00 pm APPENDIX C Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Existing Conditions KOA Corporation November 2010 -EAQij:.:(,ig.6.6AVMM:*SIRAF-#qiaIMKK.MNVifeakdatO22tar:.7i.itrVPWeP-NPETRRPttr HCM Volume to Capacity ratio ...#00-mmegaga.'4.r Ex Friday 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility k. 4\ /0. \ Lane Configurations - -19-00 1900 19 VI 44 1900 VI 0 - 1900 r '124-4101at'L In ideal z-- -1900 1900 1 uuu 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Rialkterralz.- gYq Fl Pt: 1.11 Ari 0 r 721111Palk; ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 "Slie,"g ,4-S.AWVi,f: 116V-t.,:riftrr' Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1'4. ire Fit Permitted *1161k1.0.4cf ,,,a,#:41:14.414.4.1691,10WRIOW4540;41yEettaintlargRANgtillgi ,s7.6 - • 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 g IM104100-5, At4-6" ° - Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 litafi&-42,44ingti.q41,,F 0 0 116 0 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) WeajViP'Allige Conti. Peds. (Mr) Protected Phases OtiiAt'ARNAIW Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated gIC Ratio RAT(11.0K103,10.,:. 711. - Vehicle Extension (s) 164 41,76 319 Fv- e e MRSiSTM , r - 4 9.5 28.5 0.05 0.19 20.7 13.9 32.9 20.1 ttx.• 20.7 51.2 13.9 20.1 0.13 0.08 0.23 0.13 0.13 0.37 0.08 0.13 i,t,,,---- tap, • ...,0 50.6 0.36 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 1.5 :62 4.0 vls Ratio Prot 0.04 0.17 - - vlc Ratio ROP-14.711.,v.cv Progression Factor ‘k Aft:4- Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 0.84 1.00 90.6 0.04 c0.07 c0.21 0.90 0.32 0.89 0.92 Aftte,*.lciTrattivi-401e: '"r'?.?":"-*TVIIIP-ANE..k 2.16 0.95 0.86 9.67 1.55 0.85 kvi; ige4r7 "ay- ,,A; c0.28 0.13 c0.32 0.06 0.20 0.31 1.00 65.5 1.00 51.9 1.00 1.00 85.6 65.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t,"1,14,r 594.9 86.1 43.2 68.0 316.2 42.9 66.0 297.2 53.8 127.4 VAPP•WitAt-letelVIWW-VgaIri,t4 nor ta*F"g Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.04 0W/4T-re 94.1% ICU Level of Service At-litoRt.geNr0:7412,14,,,Fet- Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Ex Friday 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations YAMS/Cab ;,Y Ideal Flow (vphpl) Teo g �-�.�:���� Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Flt Permitted 6_4 :irifol* --► %V 1900 1.00 1.00 0.95 1900 1900 1.00 • f "i ++t 1900 1900y 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 • ANA' WAttarklati,r,V.". 1121PiggagNONC •,• 0.95 k1 1.00 0.95 1.00 .�1.00 .5. 0.951 1.00ply +T., ��,:....«e.001S! ` 1p4 �"fs:sv..b•, 'c. br'31.'-'�5n.,2d�'xk 0.95 1:00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0,x°3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 44-1k1034,41400-1*. 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) Conf. Peds. (#!hr) 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 IMPAIM 10 0 0 0 t� .- 287 fi 0.82 0.82 t 44 m `� 0.82 0.88 226 295 0 173 169 0.88 0.88 630 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G ( Actuated glC Ratio 4i. } bf 4f.16X ;tea Vehicle Extension is) 25.0 39.0 0.13 0.21 • 1.5 • gf 2.0 30.0 44.0 W.412L, 0.16 0.24 1.5 �.w 2.0 44.0 16.1 50.0 0.24 0.08 2.0 2.0 50.0 35.0 68.9 0.27 0.27 0.19 4.0 4.0 2.0 0.38 4.0 vis Ratio Prot v/c Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) 0.14 c0.27 c0.17 0.05 1.13 1.28 1.10 0.22 0.27 1.00 1.00 172.1 215.0 1-i O ; r a"� Approach Delay (s) 199.1 106.8 1.00 1.00 Y6 0.07 c0.43 0.89 1.00 1.00 Witt c0.22 1.56 0.75 1.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.80 1.00 141.8 52.7 53.6 123.6 319.7 67.5 179.2 50.0 272.9 77.2 • NCM Volume to Capacity ratio Se. Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 1.39 124.4% t_ �� c "^k'w ? max." sx>" '�. ICU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Ex Friday 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility f -1* se" Lane Configurations +13 ti) MtMfltfdatiigai,, - ' ''''''.:i' • 30 7_,:.,,..A•LIORIN .,,.... Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 VtVLWittitgala%ILiltctagttOiMM*Nakaaadkagfa.tglnrgMoaa Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 r0- :'''''-iik-7-rVer 4-1310,1Lielignil. jgVAM"tOaj,n:"":ViSktaigr' 4 VIINS-Vati , Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ROISSB.3M,SOEOIWgAttked,OPPMPKSMOBNITM,tangi ..,„3101grala Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 taglagalebRIONEMMIntat I8q5MADVAPA52401C,AgialViCatingigik4ii Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.75 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PI -IF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.53 0.53 0.53 •M`-` ir&s iirrARAIS 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 9 0 0 301 toe- . Tat RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 -At, colej Confl. Peds. (#/hr) -4114: t'Ok. 11 1 14 81. Protected Phases n •-• VI'In.SMNie Actuated Green, G (s) WrgliaratMAPRI4 1 6 .5 ;:11**-Oriti,VASMIntatift!..' Ve44 8 25.2 41.0 3.6 19.4 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 ,N.41-- wwww„2,.A...4-Agtt•6_,f, Actuated g/C Ratio 01.1 '; • 0.26 0.45 0.01 0.20 Cr-ONRiateplitz4,44a -4V44.,"`Ar-aw,.„W-wei:Aptv-' WCg'ffit--WO'Wftfetfl-”NVzi 4 £r6i147. Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 2.0 2M 2.0 2.0 0.27 0.27 0.27_ 0.27 -- 41 ff '7q.W? 4;6- v'WMstTec.., 1,411:-Y5 Via-0,0AVZOWV-4:1,W41-3 vis Ratio Prot c0.20 0.24 0.02 c0.13 0.00 0. vlc Ratio 0.78 0.52 2.54 0.66 0.63 0.02 0.23 0.34 VSM010-""7'--"'I'nik:4*Iatigattfle'SINfiata:13.:74.7Wiskitrl'2i3i4LI-- Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rji Delay (s) 35.8 17.0 915.1 33.7 34.9 22.7 V44'&4'4:1-11, fAVZ 1.00 1.00 24.1 25.0 krgitAkatzit-iVi*Okit.:46iAigitibiks.45Z4efiNittavirAN:Kv'414-V-ZNPIthAPAZIO;$;- W1.5' Approach Delay (s) 22.7 7dit'Dt.WU ;2.gPtitt44:153 92.4 32.5 24.9 6-IMMIWillit-kOLLR-PL-SiYAVIW4iiPiTati-A4M-64Zal0014; HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Intersection Capacity Utilization �im: Critical Lane Group rkigife4,-; 40#4 86.5% ICU Level of Service •5•••,--•,,,.. • . . - •r, "NA., KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex Friday 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations Sign Control Free Free Stop `+'P -s. r,g4 M Yip . , .,.v��'�C��:;s�n..r.._.._ ..x -sem. Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians Lam tti N f, Walking Speed (ft/s) � � -�.,a;� wr 4 C i it •� Right turn flare (veh) 0.78 0.78 0.90 0.90 0.42 0.42 Median storage veh .°.10=r a�. pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free% Volume Left OROI cSH E 744 100 Mc"' y ee; 1274. 744 100 100 mss' S .,`ri'., a w: kvt.'ftrr T^�� Queue Length 95th (ft) 1700 873 0 1700 Lane LOS z � Yom•_; • 411. ;01 - Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (m n 0.0 Vair KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 Ex Friday 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Hourly flow rate (vph) Volume Total (vph) Olt kom-,7 Volume Right (vph) Departure Headway Capacity (veh/h) Approach Delay (s) 4 ICTV Religious Facility k. 4\ 97 59 39 TiM 120 73 48 120 121 3 v7:: .�. r e .e.:ua3t s�._ _ .A,,.'.x>- w- 'e 48 0 178 7 0 138 s) 6.5 5.7 6.4 5.5 6.4 6.4 5.3 9 73 157 t �l® 10 83 1-78 33 8 6 145 39 10 7 171 16 117 19 138 10 261 56 171 156 526 598 527 628 513 527 634 9.4 HCM Level of Service 8 Analysis Period 4' r14S5"h y mi 15 flISAMIESi 10.1 9.9 • „max" KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 Ex Sun 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations VI ft 'Pi/i +ft ++4 rAttertiiMPAMALAW519Wif-,ANSW:4.--4P4 Arg -'0$01"410M1...„, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1904 1900 -1900 1900- 1900 - -1900- -1'904 1900 1900 1900 1900 iMVSMIVII.graggZi41eatf„kdatbaCKVMFVA104.tlg§ela•Ark0.AA Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 VIMOLS.It"-"SONNIONINKANgralt 'atggtftqPgkq:-glatlgCaVf2 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4: 1--z1-WDRVIAW604,41.096,111,g9MA:1PMA, 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 'Fit :Z*146?idril!l0r Jr 91:991I'l 6 1.00 0.95 'tor' tanski;- iitiMieWtilliaalliMitgAgtOOMMitit4.1414-MISA4fn Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.89 0.89 'r.?.,:eakitAthz-14.4407:Mki,i,"41#1,-A, AtagAta IA* ' RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 208 0 0 324 FltProtected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 0 186 .7t=t1 4 • 0 7 0 11 'Protected Phases ' 7 4 5 3 8 1 5 2 3 StetiatriW7 IlAyUlaiINIBMASNOISS.LvatII - 9.2 20.7 10.2 12.7 24.2 20.5 10.2 35.2 12.7 20.5 45.5 0.06 0.17 0.07 0.09 0.20 0.16 0.07 0.30 0.09 0.16 0.40 Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated gIC Ratio k-47arafnie-123 Vehicle Extension (s) 0.05 c0.14 0.01 c0.08 c0.10 0.08 0.05 0.16 0.01 c0.18 c0.29 - - ‘';A%Ve.t.d'A:',, ge-R:AVE.4.*Wf.,,'2§n,A.WAtii5rf .;Tr.k0-..05,NA'att.°,0,t;211,4MVZ.,07,:ft,1-;-CW'kl 0.79 0.87 0.14 0.85 0.52 0.49 0.81 0.52 0.13 1.07 0.74 '-10:24-,--Afit: ''. ' ''''''''‘gOithlittinakkititMailt: litar--.061...rja0#1024i44,MAKAIIV2-141,A14-'' Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 arcar434.040.0Wr*, • 1.5 4.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 Ids Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Unkagliltlag 67.5 56.5 47.2 65.6 38.7 41.2 67.3 31.4 44.9 103.1 29.2 - 56.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 - A 137'404%. os LISIda,7,45V-1-517. ,giaiSVaTa-aa4 75.7% ICU Level of Service 7 - VIEU 4;74 g RA VA U-A,74V17C1 igaViagatWM t4g4 Z‘A--1-1 46.4 stalocz - 39.4 50.5 "r.,IrPc-t.k4 ;N4 Intersection Capacity Utilization_ aftga."- Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization Ex Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICN Religious Facility Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Utii. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected ftif in 44 $9, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 . ?, .,sr. Via:+.5E ,YJ 4g� 6 ta.7c..sI -Ii�1„ iC.r , 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91_1 . > } y. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6`. %r,,. F„..r rn'v. ; ,3.--...$d•a.. �. - ,",,,-..-4 "`...U�ABit?�, �azl�_ 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Flt Permitted 0.95 arJflitlititVIV 1.00 1V 5 #' 1 ©5 5th" .�. ..;�., ...,. sr �._ :��. .., •.r,+y4.,r�,�,. � . r3 ic�'�. 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 feWititkVIOMINKAISEAMP Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 �f'� V1fP tlhd $ RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 Ailtelritinealtr aS3s. Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) yy 109 0 0 Protected Phases 3 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.2 40.7 . sr 26.3 41.8 41.8 7.6 47.4 47.4 28.8 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.14 0.23 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.28 0.28 FI.�' i%': ..Y.-�x�.-a'...Ic.3.v,.:Lv'ims i3�i�:�P� ' �Eb 4t::"•� Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.03 c0.23 vis Ratio Prot vfc Ratio q-se Progression Factor Delay (s) Liu{..... _. 0.01 0.01 c015 0.01 0.05 0.04 ... .. 1.00 0.03 0. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Wir 11 0 92 0 83 0 29 S£k` 3 yam: 3 G4e. J .+t` r" q ]_ tf.F•-.;.;.- 'i�"`� '.'l.'�ix H . ~�"ZG'i�y6 ',ry1:��° $ ,� . ':c' ,.ve5>r �t r"� �« .e`_ 'Y-y.� ��.S'�"eew�;�� X�b ����'.;3F���� 60.8 47.9 109.9 46.8 47.7 173.1 59.5 46.4 Approach Delay (s) 51.5 ft6Ti. ):4,: f .-r- : mo i 93.3 61.1 101 68.6 0.16 0.41 2.0 4.0 c016 0.28 0.98 1.00 affS 0.69 1.00 115.3 40.4 52.6 • Critical Lane Group 0.65 86.7% ICU Level of Service V KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Ex Sun 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility 1 4- Lane Configurations 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 \* 4, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 TAWAMENNittSOMMEPJUSIOINDM:ar, * 0174WW1141,40.§.4": -4,: Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . !, ,-"rd- :-.,+:... . ' .*-=,L ,.4,,,,,-,1.. •,..,.---.:,,,A;,,...r' 'lay, ..'., -, ..,:---, -0 t 0 . : t 0 ,;• ..„.z...,- , 4.: - ..,..,,),R4 :, 04 it . ,:4;:g Le, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 w WOMINNitakwoh'inteivairiotervamiwatoolgwoor -„,,*,_ ,7470:por • &we:0 ,a.e,ftaitz4.,:i4,,, ,hogg„,..:, ,:o,a,',v,,-&,.,..,,,,m,, 4,:p.: iw,g-,.., ',.. V•az,., r.,10;.! '.gr'.,MilkIlf Flt Protected Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 RE. • %..itgAtiktiteMMOAP5a,ViintataategliVAZ4-i.T.: kg.F4.= Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.76 1.00 Jima 4:i; :*:+4,z441,-.1.444-4,;:;:zoskosimmatitit.ototkm, Peak -hour factor, PH F ,AAtititOttil,71474.-3.4 RTOR Reduction (vph) „.. Amigozo Confl. Peds. (hr) DIA-AMAYg Protected Phases kaltak3...* OhONlitaci: Actuated Green, G (s) r.11 -4,..110-.7P114104",V. ,••'' -,:g01.4 4530,41.4'N',V* ... .4 ..,•-4 ;,,.•x -&-w.; , -- -• -... Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.15 0.15 -4.i.,•0,----- .•0,:,,,-.4,..-y 1Iip 4.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.71 2 igengtZ 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 93 cir 2 5.3 15.4 5 5.6 15.7 1; -1-itigt,-avr 9.7 9.7 EU? Ii-ircifits- Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 4.0 1.5 9.7 9.7 11' %.4-2.4.14K 0 5vv,14illw 2.0 ..41aEff•Ar.6•1:aiz4 Ws Ratio Prot 9/4;RN vlc Ratio Impelge. • e..L ro 0.05 0.09 c0.06 c0.12 liate '0414../Ar 1.07 0.42 iri4.9Me ' ';4 Progression Factor Delay (s) 1.02 0.31 1.00 1.00 120.5 1 3.0 1.00 1.00 128.0 13.4 0.00 0.25 0.00 1.00 1.00 17.0 1 6.2 0.01 • .u.TWk&A.i.{244•Vh$ 0.09 0.09 1"4:1,,W4P.A.4f8L44-4,V,, 1.00 1.00 16.4 Approach Delay (s) 38.0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 37.2 17.0 16.4 7'4_'AP"12. i'ATttli&O 0.32 #0,61-114440,11091-ent ; • - F4,g- Intersection Capacity Utilization_ 10-aftWIMIN5144-0? -3/4...tvtrgsk, 42.7% Critical Lane Group ICU Level of Service A wt-t- KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex Sun 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility — - \ Lane Configurations T+4 f Sign Control Free Free Stop • .V.Aft4tv4-.. Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians ka . - . 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.62 0.62 • 1:45rfelf.igV,PV'''w;''''A2P'":'ojra''i•',''A'-o-7:-4vWWW).4v4RiaV4. pi-lpirztki-aiNg..4.0E,.w:4i.z.*_,,,,,,,Kv-0.,..,.7,*,,„=, „., Walking Speed (Ws) _,,,,W;;,„!:,,,,,r:VZ.:,(q/.4iN.,,,,,,-7q;M,W:-1-.4;4,,1---;.,V.NR.",;.',...417F-7-74V-.:,,,V,M0±1,.V.,:W.:,,,N -,V;,.,A,,,,t,..0,-;:-.7*!,,,.07&L.,;;,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,5,,,,,a.M,,a.,1,-,ft Right tum flare (veh) ,0.141.14.44:46;i- 4,0'1 --'''' ‘,7411.* ',.,1,t,k,,V ' ".'-• - ' kolMar..., . .,-.10;:: ..0,„!,=':, ,. 24:42A4EVOMN,W_Slegt-M-,M1. 4.V. -Z'!.'4,t Median storage veh ' ininSIVA ' ., .:.., -:,..,R.rgL,-7.,..,ztw...tv.,-mz pX, platoon unblocked .4110016 :46 t~. Exrci , . rkV:;,° _Are.}.,,,zSiarxrif,.:exv vC1, stage 1 cont vol r4-1;"3/41AleV,M vCu, unblocked vol •Ve .•:?4,?.‘• tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 343 • -2- ., • 7 ° id rr: rararirr„raef r'N,r14,,,ty.,1•4 474 613 329 airgr„...Ea 99 100 7-zso 7; • VpjagfAdi_Q:XAiq.iek;,P-a-M,Vbtt*taiPj-W-gTAttfRliXPI'trrg,-ZtiVret4tq.irtWrXPttgVi5 0 0 5 Volume Left oSH .,;4101,.[Ti.14ii.GaWOra, N-4'114 —•4 Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS 411%.7.5V"' 4,0-014K k e .wzr. 1700 1227 459 g - A-4 •,g 500, -4-4, ',4'444%-1Z0*-- Itt!A161;70Avegpyitc*L.T,;,44.fttaskthg-Macgilentk-4-44a.VA,r14,4 Approach LOS : 1 - Average Delay -P'''._14,:'-'41°0-A-71041911.4011074- Analysis Period (min ' 0. 7 VrY 15 ;i'AZ-SaV .-lxvilti4-0-'Itate-W71;; AVIPM--,471f-Z..P3:44,%****;E*VEVt: 4 = • r KOA Corporation Synchro 7- Report Page 4 Ex Sun 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations` Pb :Ai' 6lj Ali '-� xy. J.., PI � . fi z _ _Nxr ? . �.. w L, favim ., Volume (vph) 28 43 16 A k t P Hourly flow rate (vph) Volume Total (vph) Volume Right (vph) Mittcps i^ Departure Headway (s) Capacity (vehlh) Approach Delay (s) 34 52 20 34 72 rrF 12 12 195 401402, 20 0 ?tSit 6.0 5.3 5.9 bac 569 646 582 7.8 8.4 90 18 73 122 28 42 149 80 122 9 0 73 44 ? iP 4.9 5.6 5.8 4.7 698 604 588 9.0 8.6 725 54 149 7 73 • ^.x -�,.To� ,��, Vis= �v _ g._,t .�.. y.sfi .,5��`-s �''ir .��s'�.`+.`�.% �" �w;*s r.,,•-.a;4� HCM Level of Service Analysis Period Txa. 15 twg a KOA Corporation Synchro 7 e Report Page 5 APPENDIX D Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Opening Year Conditions KOA Corporation November 2010 j Ex +Amb Fri 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd 1CTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations VI 4+ r • 11) 44 if 1i) +14 r 'ffil to natt,t ,..• 7IN.MT;SiMi-4'Me6:AVMISIEM,fait41_VitgiMMMM€1RRINSVEdfg Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t -,„ --:.,:,.:-§,„:4:w.,ord-mqgligF4tpf-Axr,argiipp.S1pgqtlt--Mgkt-VakPrjtrg”la,,,-.,''Lr c't4i c.%.-4,--;%;,:'!,a0af.,: ,11.&e4A.W0-4Alt.k.,..,,.....:,..e--21DAL :gfil, - , • ' n.E.---ft.if .'3Zt-.11.5A-.- ,4Z4g.' ...,1&,;.m.". k&t.M7-. - 4;.'.3:.2:= ' faft.13t'-1,-:! Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ':',,Lqtf.ZVSaaaVatMIXMMttdntnitaaaglz:an 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lane UtiI. Factor 11.4V - Fit Permitted 4r4,:a'S Peak -hour factor, PH F 4(;-;j1113- . RTOR Reduction (vph) .cii.li.647S24.0610° "5*Wit, .W. . ;AIX"."` .azif:To...- °Vr/a- • ,:sei • 333 201.r.r,? 3 ;'-44.1 §.! 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 .taTifir.A.M.P.W. ;0' :iiikisks„,$1,AftEtegt-,IIIRtg 0 4 ailieWitfean? 163 316 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 04:240tatit Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 9.9 29.3 Actuated g!C Ratio 1 kr: 22.0 14.5 33.9 20.0 22.0 52.8 14.5 20.0 50.8 ta • " -•frk r3C,"",-Vp.33; , EIRMS.* - 0.09 0.23 0.13 0.14 0.37 0.09 0.13 0.36 -13. 446ZIOS6 17%33...3: F,3,3‘33 116 0.90 ""'• • VAT Vehicle Extension (s) 0.05 0.20 0.14 *AP 1.5 2.0 4 r vtat . Ids Ratio Prot 0.04 0.18 0.86 0.94 vlc Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 Yq . 7,,fr, latiAr'PAir'Mal= . ,,,i, rt wt. 0.y.ve.ppf.,, At1-4,nirg , r,4•,-4--34 -..7.--Aq ..t-' 0.05 00.08 00.22 00.31 ' 0.14 -00 34 .„ ___,_, ,,,,,,,,,x,,,,..,..„., --,-..?,,y,-,./..,•::::: -,ida • WIN- ..-3W-fe.i'- A...e.., ,', ..3-, • ^ ''.' %, ''''"3, 0.97 2.46 0.96 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.21 0.33 0.37 0.91 0.74 1.69 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 A4F- - s• a - 93.0 73.8 52.8 91.0 75.0 732.3 88.4 46.9 76.2 380.0 49.4 71.7 361.2 57.7 151.6 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 11,04,,72Wki".4-WE g±1,414r 98.3%, ICU Level of Service 1.12 '.&-11•4;. : Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 - • . . ... • • • Ex +Amb Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations VI " +ft r1 +4$ ., ' „ .....4tr4 , , .. . ISal'ik-- 12561 371 .., , ..„.. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1999 1900 1900_-,,, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7994900-Top19._.9,mkzMVg%at*fAk_APMAtttCtM„ Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 44. 7.30,retatt! _607: Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rar'4k Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 it_rikAggeeli., ` 42ISi4.-.._10 .,.4b#,Aktil N1* -§1 - 4itialle : :VIORIVO- Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 .. W4r1y4 ,..411Eriymi1805 g161 -42L.,:' ..':''',vilatelanktefi-;:giif ti''41§titgl*VOM!-1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 '1,10A(N-OPZisz:::-4tieltriMgargUtt: Itele-Strhi:Fri"-ie4.414-:_',40144Witti.P,'' At, RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 0 240 0 0 173 g,...., ,.:,.a,--4„1tow!:. :,„...o.i.v.k.,-4-4, , -D,i4yi - Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 287 295 169 630 Protected Phases tatiO11016$A Actuated Green, G (s) 25.0 39.0 ianOrattin. :784, 3 8 "pm Actuated 9IC Ratio 0.13 0.21 eJ_(.4argitif P.1,234, 1.5 2.0 Vehicle Extension (s) • • 2 . . 30.0 44.0 44.0 16.8 50.0 50.0 e 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.27 0.27 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 35.0 68.2 0.19 0.38 2.0 4.0 vis Ratio Prot .5313 vtv,ank, , vlc Ratio Progression Factor n:-10 % 0.15 c0.28 c0.18 0.05 0.07 c0.45 go 0).-, -,..04- ' i, .-•;-1 ,..A.---A---7,,',,jii.,!..e.-,:v_.7,,.:-5.i.141.LIT,ffcs,_".,.-4,..,-1,,,AVI.a.1:-.7 .... :.---„,,-.-,,,- ,..... el .4.3`C: hig-37.,g:--,6: .:•'' .... V%-4-'' - '...2.t.. 1.19 1.36 1.17 0.23 0.29 0.89 1.66 046rAletAikkArdfle Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 228.4 121.7 PUgligaMfa6V-rftWAiSsal.-gfitAtittgeti,.W4%:A:4:550#3r-iajiiicen-lE-Vti-a. 1.06-"1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 -44.1k-Asle5j 197.0 246.9 166.1 52.9 53.8 120.7 361.6 c0.23 0.33 0.83 1.26 0.86 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 75.4 207.2 53.6 P..in-ttitk-Z443,1Air4Z;latiItAWS 307.8 86.0 ;*'79&b.49Tg3iiltki0fi.tgAV-Vifliibti.gfaTo*PAKOAII:bilr HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.48 Xr.T4711t..-14:014.gi°' - '•W tkAWM Intersection Capacity Utilization 128.4% liffilaPtag,010.2 c Critical Lane Group ICU Level of Service U .L VW. KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 }.-.7A41..)tei534:7Z6rniri•.'1:;Wr!ars*.P=4,4:.5:7Agrin, Approach Delay (s) 28.2 77.1 1 1 J . . .." ....• Ex +Amb Fri 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility C 4- 41\ Lane Configurations jft, "i Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 `°,.W.C.,••• 2:15Vdts-.11.1-AllIALAM-AW Lane Uti . Factor 1.00 0.95 • "§; Ac 44A44-aggilg011er 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • - '••41'. . 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4A434.4tatitattriattrVakSiStAttAVANSA Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 CirajZV''. {1V41411tWMIAMIAgatAt. Fit Permitted We: 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 364,161Miteat-IMMAir 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 laggatsle- 0.24 1.00 0.75 1.00 Tgi r40.:141 -f• re P•ktk76,2" Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.90 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1:WV,i,00,490,taRtliiikiat°-4104; Cod. Peds. (#/hr) 11 0.90 0.90 0.77 0.77 0:77 0.53 0.53 "eV 14 298 0.53 81 DtiR'0:i:;-,,3..r.s:51Ntinttejs!,,t4te 0°- :°,4,t6.-1;f,V$A4,91$.7.4:467.41,t4A4- tY*Ii,r4i14 Protected Phases 01' 51 014;46-"A4111I-Zt 110-0'" 7.4'4-kv4t414i114.,kAr---tv4, Actuated Green, G (s) 26.8 41.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.42 GEodirUAdthAct'44-1.13,4h,.voi Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 4.0 3.9 18.8 32.1 32.1 32.1 7•7 0.01 0.17 • `,Est..-t";'24/0'',4t; • ".±-s'- 1.5 4.0 0.32 0.32 2.0 2.0 32.1 0.32 0.32 2.0 2.0 -21('V'f-Fi'W,r4.-°:6116i):37:043.14*-0S \VI rAiket:1 40:$.1 C.314:ad . .444.k. ".ir• '44-",V4.0,5".W vis Ratio Prot v/c Ratio c0.22 c0.25 '71"..•hf:Vs' 0.84 0.60 1.83 0.79 0.02 c0.14 k.17, 0.01 0.11 j, 0.50 0.02 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.35 1.00 1.00 '7101 "k.K.. Vt'Pgra-VAVIR4.47,4Z114*4 40444-- WV-1ga Delay (s) 44.1 21.2 575.9 43.6 26.4 21.5 22.9 24.2 25.4 24.0 • HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 88.2% ICU Level of Service 4.7 47•44'7.-73. 441' ":047.1 47,7 rfo 74> KOA Corporation Synch ro 7 - Report Page 3 • • - • - _ - _ • . ..• .•- • - - - • -•-• • Ex +Arrib Fri 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Coiibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations ta, FreSt.op Sign Control Free Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians "e• 4v4.1-titlk amt -.11,..%. -Ph- • 0.78 0.78 0.90 0.90 0.42 0.42 :04f#AVA4Vgag:':' Walking Speed (ft/s) J -W -Aka' Right turn flare (veh ellititiSAbiTIOAT4--,!: Median storage veh) u1511'.001-11.RIKceit, pX, platoon unblocked r 4;167 4-Otti.:42itlz,ez,,y, vC1, stage 1 conf vol • - " 41.11-- 4- - vCu, unblocked vol tc,-2stage (s) • p0 queue free % aW121W61.0- MOS WV1-100:' 011 Z*1- t344911 441SWAVA2.:',Atvg" 1351 788 100 7V6it?I.V- • VtigX•4,:cr, :Se fp/ - , 4191"4 VAT' "Zt 788 • 'Ag"PelAtit 100 100 :viihWotgisk • Yrn • .44*-XieVarAMM. *'APSOIR: Volume Left cSH •••410,,, .qh•gr; 1700 840 1700 1-L-4 - Queue Length 95th (ft) €W6flifWAalf-MIA,o ikAgi,444044.04-' Lane LOS Approach LOS WA' ittr*OM,499k-gt!':-.A • "-'..6*-tv=f--- , • ,0 • •-•-• 14440 Vea ..15.444•00 4 4..• -k -1-,L Average Delay 5511:04-141,Alt*P.AbratakViald ° Analysis Period (min Nr-it*Ile-S*445:4, 4>g, 0.0 15 -A•44,fn KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 Ex +Amb Fri 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln 1CTV Religious Facility .#44 {4__ t d Lane Configurations WM!: A*:atkaiataiAr't,S'BtaaRtAIPUdVkEaAtktVMIOiaNakgittli Volume (vph) 103 63 41 10 77 166 35 8 6 154 17 124 Ohiati:AISEliiiii '-'41ZASOI litlitASEAMMaUe 4" ',z. - 084''''1'/' IG:SANZ:Vi Hourly flow rate (vph) 127 78 51 11 88 189 42 10 7 181 20 146 Volume Total (vph) 127 128 11 276 58 181 166 ,ve: Volume Right (vph) :1569; jahoof NAtr- - V- 4 -.1; '37x.gent 0 51 0 189 7 0 146 Departure Headway (s) 6.6 5.8 5.6 --------------- Capacity (veh/h) -0414171WX,W74'4‘.- Approach Delay (s) NNA-igraialbrig--4b 6.6 1 47 6.6 6.6 5.4 491, 517 586 518 616 499 519 9.7 \se 11.3 10.3 10.3 0, - • ' ;AZ' • 622 • FICM Level of Service Analysis Period (min) ••-••,,• -17 15 4,1 -", KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 �y�e i is .k.o � yvs:�Sr ,r. . igel ^' 4 ': FR.��.. �-m w�t�-�',:`.'r'�t._'F'i.���� �i �� HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Ex + Amb Sun 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICN Religious Facility J Lane Configurations /111 ff ' r /111 ft 4:y :190�3a;5iy.rF; 8 '0{tk�2' 4 ► "`c4 0 1900w1900;1900190�a0 ,1900 rrait'ar�"-`J 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 190 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Lane UK Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Fit Permitted akafi��7-- tem Vo ` up. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 is 6 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.89 0.89 by'''`A4131' ,,. v ' 131'. 220 0 320 196 4 0 11 �-d Protected Phases • p R.1-4,4401101%44, uM v i.. Va' Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 22.3 Actuated gIC Ratio a Vehicle Extension (s) 0.06 0.17 1.5 2.0 10.7 13.4 26.0 20.3 0.07 1.5 0.09 0.20 1.5 2.0 0.1 10.7 38.5 13.4 20.3 48.1 5 0.07 0.32 0.09 1.5 1.5 • 4.0 1.5 0.15 0.40 1.5 4.0 vis Ratio Prot vic Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) 0.05 c0.15 0.81 0.89 0.01 c0.08 c0.11 0.10 0.06 0.16 0.01 c0.19 c0.31 0.15 0.88 0.53 0.64 0.84 0.52 0.13 1.21 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 72.2 60.3 49.5 72.1 40.3 48.9 73.5 31.9 47.1 157.6 31.4 Approach Delay (s) 59.8 ry 51.7 41.1 67.9 • Intersection Capacity Utilization OMKAIRr°dnn .r,;.1 a te Critical Lane Group 78.5% ICU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Ex + Amb Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations •Aa��f Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Ffpb, ped/bikes ax Flt Protected Flt Permitted + +++Qy �fy1r '} ftp .. vf-P :.a.`_ �,' 6�' r.2+,17 i�•FLS" 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 5r -{,ate �' t! - 4gV 5ko• -5F @ 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 vAeriF 3 r a 0.91 1.00 1.00 , 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 q,oo 09 r -v��ti 0---60,,,--- i s� ' &� z€ 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 rillxtit]77 IA9lai4t48Ms c L1 - T . , Y 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 xv 0.95 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.67 0.67 0.67 '�.:4rt�,iF"�r7..lY�B9'�`F��`�' �, �ia�. ,.x � 3 - • _ RTOR Reduction (vph) Conff. Peds. (#/hr) Protected Phases 19 k• 9 ).77 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 0 139 0 0 ��i't ok. Yom �n_ r"i-aSa' Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated gJC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 25.1 39.8_ 0.13 0.22 1.5 2.0 27.9 42.6 42.6 7.9 49.0 49.0 30.6 71.7 IMO " 514740% 0.15 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.28 0.28 0.17 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 0.42 4.0 *Pt ititaigPir.' vls Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.04 1.00 1.00 c0.15 0.01 41}- 0.03 c0.24 c0.17 0.30 1.02 0.03 0.11 0.94 0.88 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 yy 1.00 1.00 1.00 63.0 50.6 0.71 1.00 1.00 114.2 48.2 49.2 180.7 63.4 47.8 120.7 41.3 Approach Delay (s) 54.4 96.8 64.7 54.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio intersection Capacity Ufilizafion c Critical Lane Group 111 4 44"a 4 a pal; r WW 0.72 88.8% ICU Level of Service Anif Xz_ KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Ex + Amb Sun 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility • Lane Configurations 44, 44, 'I I, iiIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .1900 1900 1900 1900 rr ' 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Util. Factor r"." -g4 • - -'Vkk '.W;k4v.34,W!,44P' j*.eig90.tal.R.**,.4.47411040iftit. Rob, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 c-ive, tf-A-Sfit,=5-1-Av?"-ttlikt*W-liVegs-VP-'014ile'4 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 _ 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.76 1.00 j. 4.1.1 Fit Permitted .`:,,0_,*.•e4-well-701,, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.88 0.88 0.88 /14411501Pis,atifkA ARNi-gi4 -44,14LAm. RTOR Reduction (vph) ':L•i4':?'i'll'%f1115,,,gfMMqggg-Vgg-r-r"i-'Agetqfst9k4,-1= Confi. Peds. (#/hr) 0 0 (te-V-i-X6P 4 4--P64` 99 quanig4-ieiliVwiWk-ONV-Vapat,c.. ,-;44:616,13 Protected Phases '!ieiftr4settdigrfiz:P:tq*dia:iki.z.,::'i.rvkrstf_tm,; 74-iiitatiOgiigAVNe--ArgtaNg-0.441eAAAti,r*c404.11A Actuated Green, G (s) 5.5 15.9 5.8 16.2 4.01#419.10:ft44.-*-49:0U0174,14.kr, Actuated gIC Ratio 0.06 0.28 421,4 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 4.0 --pagiste4, 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 'X',W"'',r '4AP' IiriEW:Ms'..eiZ''4U.:40r4'44V'tPa:WA... 0.06 0.29 DE -4.• 4:4kn 1.5 4.0 0.15 0.15 2.0 2.0 • • ••',3e1,,Pri:',d-1,..•.• 0.15 0.15 2.0 ..- 5.4 2.0 '40.(2-4-ffil4NOWA5MaktiV4:141M.en,'.4' V.:41 -100:2;?.- tejt; vis Ratio Prot 1,744-1,,t-:461.41-tt v/cRatio 0.06 0.09 c0.07 cO.13 1.02 0.32 tYtifti;A r41.1a° Progression Factor Delay (s) 1.00 1.00 117.5 13.1 1.07 0.43 1.00 1.00 127.4 13.5 0.27 0.00 11° 114 ,.4.4-A454s9WA.7 TV 4: 0.00 . 0.10 cot `42*;•=e•tr-...? m•4 1.00 1.00 17.5 16.5 0.01 0.09 • 1.00 1.00 16.8 16.8 Approach Delay (s) 37.4 37.2 17.4 16.8 t,.;-1•4`..Rtgi*ak.'1Hje,i'egalgete!..L.i?-ttWhVItarr.t=tat-lt-Sg4,.V1. HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.33 rs4AtitaVi44aNZARVAWMAti -:L;aftft11;r. Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.7% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex+AmbSun 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0..62 0.62 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ftls) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf voi 4-43 1 e. , 498 4.:.rs t s7 vCu, unblocked vol IC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 100 M a wfW • as s Y-4 gg&we-.. , 364 Volume Left cSH 1700 1206 437 650 • 99 MOW� p,, a , t va. Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS Approach LOS AverageDelay 016171,:4-1,71VOcat 0.1 349 100 te_ Analysis Period (min) 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 j Ex + Amb Sun 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICN Religious Facility Lane Configurations Volume (vph) ci Hourly flow rate (vph) Volume Total (vph) Volume Right (vph) 30 46 37 • y 17 10 57 95 19 3 6 117 5 57 56 21 14 77 128 30 5 9 158 7 77 37 77 14 205 158 21 0 128 9 0 6.0 5.3 5.9 5.0 5.7 Departure Headway (s) Capacity (vehlh) ey)F Approach Delay (s) 562 7.9 veltkowfmr,Pt.ove 14-41 637 576 690 592 8.7 9.1 77 5.9 4.7 581 715 8.8 HCM Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Ex +Amb +Project Fri 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility t \.* Lane Configurations tri tt ++ r +++ 411, -1906 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 'h41.4., jf&r Lane UV!. Factor ARe 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.9791 -r,a-qD:;k:VIIROS:t'i'--qii`;, '0=V -+-4TIA9etrci'da.V(.4 0.95 1.00 0. . . . . 97 091 100 097 0 qo:.AvsAgOrgft;:-ttfi.aikiditaelteoxfkba Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 6r4 otfk. Flt Permitted -141,4UfrigkitatjaV4-10.410101.40 :1,12LitY '14 0.95 1.00 1.000.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ttwerkitios.,44, tOISAVietriAl 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 .1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 41t MircViVratillt?9", ak. ,334' K.JCW- P rgi At Peak -hour factor, PHF 01E174; Ailf/T';t'''• RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 163 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 -0kg02,!Nvkiflok6::611.”042TiARAKIAIrti 0 316 113 ,*:atIM:1Vg•-ai#SXat-ta#Msti*?ieM,SMVR'ttg:-, Protected Phases rAf ti4 - --44. --;VANCIttegagtining-S,W-,r4;41,Qt•Sk,f• -.VV-e441"14.41,!- ... Actuated Green, G (s) 9.9 29.3 22.0 14.5 33.9 20.0 22.0 52.8 14.5 20.0 50.8 q-INAKAgain,-A4Siitia-faitt600 ' 404 0- tiAig.740:14.tt-24taletaigagtOik CarrOW "4:11,-;'‘-- 0.05 0.20 0.14 0.09 0.23 0.13 0.14 0.37 0.09 0.13 0.36 kAlgq.E1PrIrigOtal,*,...--***40:AR,I, Vehicle Extension Actuated glC Ratio (s) 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 :.16JT;M9;:tgt•gtlr-F.ktfiit4"rirt4*-•tkeqr;AMt't-a%**-a:XSAagV4AXP'et:VAZTMN:tttVg•S213WRVVta* 0.04 0.18 0.05 c0.08 c0.22 c0.31 0.14 c0.34 0.06 0.21 0.34 ' fo vls Ratio Prot vlc Ratio -4 ' - Wlif.-4,4.'- 1-1•Wit-UVAVP!,D21D7Cht,,X..s ''''';?::,:.:',WAVN-Vet 0.86 0.94 - 0.37 0.91 0.97 2.46 0.96 0.93 0.76 1.69 0.94 -00.C.ZO•fak-itzt'i-44aPreN,i7-"g-,*104V4440,1 t -1P•06?-*MAtaagagjigtitilkalvOi-i° 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Progression Factor re> rg,,5-1.pm7,141ift-;43s-htvm Delay (s) 93.0 73.8 52.8 91.0 75.0 732.3 88.4 49.8 79.0 380.0 52.8 ee4'7-4!•71t0ii4 Approach Delay (s) 71.7 361.2 59.7 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 151.9 t7, i•ig! 1.13 " 0,41-1:ciAtqr*Ft4ir.g4t$4*--V4V-441-1(ke ••• 99.1% ICU Level of Service _ - • • , _ so, 1.11,-,4•5 • c Cdtical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 .. _ Ex +Amb +Project Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility t 4/ Lane Configurations I + II' +++ rfte4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 11:-Ie..;;i4g§iti-if.t413-'611410PRIMPOr 1900 1.00 1.00 ' 097 1.00 1.00 toa 0.91 1.00 1:00 0.91 440-1442**414 Lane Util. Factor tr4,101g- Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1101001.9.e.4 1.00 1.at. 991:99).90tiv,,,ni SWA-94fagiltirgiar,,ARIA- t; '''' -7ArMattn..*' ':aW.,::,k,-- ,, - •,,,a ._-4„,,.. •,,,L,.., , Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 ' er3--ArftotageMirittK, ,,t„,, 0.95 1.00 at e Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ; • . _ . , 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1z1,44-. Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 Ye.4*.jk RTOR Reduction (vph) Off-4-lectitbedeR* Conti. Peds. (#/hr) • - 10 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 AtAit.44A4T-AVSAV-W38. 254 195 ‘„4-, 4P4., p#Tark :4407. 287 295 169 630 Protected Phases i-1:401140akalAa.-*= d*.!- tl'AzOtk-, 50.0 50.0 35.0 68.2 Ac?'PT 4.4,1 otArretiFAMS Actuated Green, G (s) ..7"1 -111-1,4X2'4Afr Actuated 25.0 39.0 30.0 44.0 44.0 16.8 IC Ratio geiffinitiCt? .96 Vehicle Extension (s) 0.13 0.21 1.5 -n47,0 4'1^ 2.0 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.08 . „ . 1.5 -(44. 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.38 - .•41,17*,rt. '''k,-.Alkt; -WA ititteit''*"7:7).0W4 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 8:= “.4A-4.7" WA44141 :;-10%;-WhItg-,1V-4'); 6v;01045-44.jVc---LAWX-4A-Lt 7i2A0-4-1-ite c0.20 0.05 v/s Ratio Prot ;11.--: .1=16 ,4*-• vlc Ratio rAltikalt Progression Factor 0.15 c0.28 1.19 1.36 1.00 1.00 .:-,'!1-76*-0•04,0'11AltAt:1*At RtkatRIAN1164:ttia.:24Y; kr44:4K. =W4- : Delay (s) 0.07 c0.45 :4 0.89 0.89 1.66 0.93 1.30 0.86 1.27 0.23 0.31 • " Pg. fa, 44A. e0.24 0.33 /IA: -0, 47.4its, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Approach Delay (s) 197.0 246.9 209.7 52.9 54.0 120.7 14j /41‘. 361.6 94.2 226.7 53.6 228.4 149.8 306.7 91.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.51 i''''-';it',7)4S-I-NOr'ILKti-',4W):9::'1;74-;5,40.--tikg-.,41-.:Ult,?!@kz,r--, 4'4 - ttd-t*V-0-0k5-Atilkiip, 2.-‘„,..-',,.-,.S..t... ; sAt' - • . Intersection Capacity Utilization 130.4% ECU Level of Service .„...„H c Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Ex +Amb +Project Fri 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Ff pb, ped/bikes r. Flt Protected p Flt Permitted J +t "1 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 rix _ti ' `i" MA-. 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 e2 1 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 gikS at Peak -hour factor, PHF ‘.111c RTOR Reduction (vph) Dai Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.90 ;liaf Bet 11 4 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.53 0.53 0.53 14 301 81 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g1C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 25.1 0.24 1.5 43.8 0.43 4.0 • 3.9 22.6 0.01 1.5 0.21 4.0 47. 32.1 32.1 0.31 0.31 2.0 2.0 329 32.9 0.31 0.31 2.0 2.0 vls Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) c0.22 0.27 0.92 0.62 1.00 1.00 0.02 c0.15 .94 0.74 1.00 1 -�...};'•s'�� �� ;�--ria=,.:.�,°. ti�� ��_"�� K ti �i lr� .ki �ir"r`-s`f �: = ca1� z {s ��.+,"k.,..: "•�,*;cKx" .am..'.�. .u.:t,.i:v--��.-i�..'�r..s:.� _4 t�-. -„�. +a.:i�'-�-. e,8. �..w_.:a- :.a'� kx Approach Delay (s) 71.9 60.5 21.5 .00 628.8 38.7 v_s at 0.01 0.54 0.02 1.00 1 .00 28.8 22.4 0.11 0.21 0.35 1.00 1.00 23.9 25.2 32.7 27.5 25.0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 0.71 89.8% ICU Level of Service wzo KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex +Amb +Project Fri 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurelions t4. 4 V veritqwk - Free Sign Control Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians 3-400 Walking Speed (ftls) Right turn flare (veh) h.141reginiKACOM,N Free Stop 0.78 0.78 0.90 0.90 0.42 0.42 Median storage veh) OpirOnaiiiiiS it -2$ ' pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 confvol vCu, unblocked vol k4ieftilgR-24,040,14*0 tC, 2 stage (s) oi:ag.,020:141.-5attek- p0 queue free % Volume Left cSH " .00 _WA V-Pe'e'T,741M-: abagiigiggggePKW • vfktlw ----ASTAWMV,2U-44 S'T&L.Wb.ZfAy„-wt.74R1,,,65e,a- ,;;;0.-4p6iggt4k1AUVig4AWWWL -atftWMAXUAWA • ,...&-i-4,A5kr 884 1433 826 alOrU4.ola-4WV115,-;‘Az _ 97 88 .eS14agia4,04111iihe.,, .'Aigri4V-VON*44nriVinifi' letupri30,V*A.ca,,kg-'41-ga?-4,1,4,-qMir 0 245v4146 ifOlt 17, e- V114,-;' 1700 787 171 t'LA.z.iNg;r7.4ift--15-74i4i**;14:10 22 136 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 2 222 :011.agRallaitatifei4S74:061W4JAH4a.ag44.;:i4L-. s14144.17V'4116iStit-N-iftiAgfilkiritftittagetiliiigazoi. Lane LOS A F Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (min OV,V4154.1.13.5**k. 14: 15.8 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 '1-472,1 HCM Level of Service Ex +Amb +Project Fri 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations Volume (vph) c 4 - 115 63 41 - 10 77 AvAit:Ovava*-tri4, 161.M - etigtfe, Li Hourly flow rate (vph) • Volume Total (vph) "4 -Alp PA -4 Volume Right (vph) .x• 142 4, Witmax,,:_k-041" 172 35 8 6 160 17 136 VIA* i,:vadm -1,1, 78 51 11 88 195 42 10 142 128 --41441„: zokatatrate, 51 0 195 r:IVMtkii-Vtr=.1 11 283 58 188 180 Departure Headway (s) 6.7 5.9 6.7 5.7 6.7 6.6 5.5 188 • 0 , 0A.67-,NAV-atlIgesfAX*M50-04,S-OrtirVIYA4 41trittiMAAMOLIV---Ate-4-ti '4601-itt„ Capacity (vehlh) 51 1 577 510 606 479 514 615 rIcata,r;R:Vta;a0Pon'14,Attqf,AAV Approach Delay (s) A•5P.:45))11-4K-::sti' 10.1 11.8 10.5 10.7 20 160 1,-YR4iffct-W9wq, Analysis Period (min) 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 1 Ex + Amb Project Sun 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations VI ftjVVI ft In .44 vili 4414 % - ---,,,,:,,xv,,,,,,w..-,-,-,,•••-: 7'4g4Sg',IriPgRWkVEE'-"OWAA1E,,-,."':EE-4 ,-1 7 --r,AE-1.6Er6A4.VER4AA66,'_,. -122 Ideal Flovv (vpholli: .1„1900 .2:4900w1,900. 190 ,5 1900 91,,,,,:,_, .,,,,1900 alltaz:11; I 0... - -'4VU.*- Lane IJtiI. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 _,.. *ROO, 11:1:::; 494,--e, •-..,.,.. ‘•,. , , §0., ,, .t f 11-1, ,,... ,:: A .0.-0..• A•m:.,„ '=„0„,, ••",,,,-.,•WiA,"fr'' ') ;If' A_ V.4 0 '!: ''-- Y'E i1 c, ,,,,-,„ „n .,,,,u: 4 . 1 ,,..4,..,:k.,_ Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 42K2:::-:7-14811,143-MIMA-0141.41IMUNI ,er Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 '4°4; greq.•'';- iNVI0,10:405:1 ,„ Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.89 0.89 - - 0 7 0 r 4.1014*)_iNtr04-4,1141-40..ttrake.,01k RTOR Reduction (vph) fii-AATtiii0grirg00,' 3-F•154Attze,1.0Q,•: Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 220 318 196 dlia,11,4,21*AZWiiMONSOAL,T,:;. 11 figfogiL•Vii:001P-4•VictifitAt.,1Ariffisdri4:::1' Protected Phases '-..:4IigOgikkgigArt.44:4442tA4:4,1"r4itte.• Actuated Green, G (s) "AWAR Actuated gIC Ratio iit'-ktv• 9.7 22.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 0.06 0.17 - cf4r14;00.4.a* V.It*.4744 %)4664P766/6/&:? -E "'IlEkif66.,.. 4 10.7 13.4 26.0 20.3 10.7 39.6 13.4 20.3 49.2 t- 10.11,-;4..;•Vgint 0.07 0.09 0.20 0.15 0.07 0.32 0.09 ..• 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 . 4.0 0.15 0.41 1.5 1.5 4.0 "fArQvgiRAWOnsk4; v/s Ratio Prot ' E.E" 66'4' E6.• 0.05 !AL 0.05 c0.15 0.01 c0.08 c0.11 0.10 0.06 0.17 0.01 c0.19 c0.32 " "ipW•wolgo VE:E-EYar,i-lkif).4:17N • 1.22 0.79 -. - - • ^AZ vlc Ratio 0.82 0.90 0.15 0.88 0.54 0.65 0.85 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) - .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 74.2 62.3 50.1 74.3 40.9 50.1 76.0 32.0 47.6 163.8 31.8 14-e Approach Delay (s) 61.4 52.9 41.3 69.1 Verrnit:441*A7140404,11aP HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 n?-1Y-W1:14-04iArk-ataVtlfr--40-5•r:-:4;%.4.1A;;;;7, 'VX,M#V1 79.4% ICU Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization l''.Vrt • s," 1.414f Critical Lane Group D KOA Corporation Synch ro 7 - Report Page 1 Protected Phases Ex + Amb + Project Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICN Religious Facility Lane Configurations Ideal Ffow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Fit Protected Flt Permitted k. t 7 1 +,++R +ft4.f� .. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 too 1.00 X1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95_y 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 , > � (Y�J(�}j S ` rr77�' F �"� 4 3 ,, f his e �1"..mak-,Z,}41.- „ 4.H�3F . Sd..'�SiJ'�a� _ �i'i�ti.�, �r,.,_�'.. _+- _s5'.r.�L 0.95 1.ry00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 t WP4'"9. r ,axe pg 152 Confl. Peds. (#/h) 131 0.88 'AO tfitigT4 Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated gIC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 25.0 39.1 o 0.13 0.21 30.0 44.1 44.1 8.1 49.4 49.4 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.28 0.28 ''6 7.14.--" • <X :'tee 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 32.2 73.5 0.17 0.42 2.0 4.0 vis Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.04 5�. 1.00 1.00 F rc c0.17 0.01 0.03 c0.24 1.06 0.03 �Ca -ATP. c0.18 0.30 0.12 0.93 0.89 0.38 1.02 0.71 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 64.8 52.8 $ �?�� Fit 4 a`r�fyq,� 4� �; ��4�i�-� -w�•gA.i.,��� . r 126.6 48.6 49.8 1746 65.8 ...s'c4 50.3 124.8 41.8 �s'At W1�_�Vaf¢:. dS.,K-kfraiVP YT O Approach Delay (s) 56.4 106.2 66.3 56.0 '! HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity utilization Critical Lane Group 0.75 89.5% !CU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 1 Ex + Amb Project Sun 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd 1CTV Religious Facility k- 4 at fa. ,I, 4/ Lane Configurations ftY 'Pi tra. 1 T.) li ta S9-' -''''32t'''-'"*30 i89 o86:144424:t37vA1:Vo. .A.,;:t,. . kw- , Ideal Flow (vphpf) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 rjAamiP,!:P-,::tir-- talattliWAW'ItILM4v -411-7Z+21- 74200i" ' 1 15--"e•W' 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane LAI. Factor 444takftc12;00149i*-Sk-.'1,A.-‘114a-44.01.t.,',61/20Att‘ Rob, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -''''2! 6 ''),, .;,, 1.0 ,.•-k ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,>,, , 1.00 1.00 1-.4i.,,,,,mwAorNi. iw.L.`,i.•,; A ,,, ,..ii,,z :,....,,q 6 '',W..... 40.39. 04 , 4i- .6, ... J. 0 .... . 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ,A,.w....,pmt...;.t.twevw4..„„%v, w„si0•9O0 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.76 1.00 -.A; a ‘,.. • Fit Protected Peak -hour factor, PHF i'.'611111Mafront‘t*:44:- RTOR Reduction (vph) C,onfi. Peds. (#/hr) 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 ag-fiev z 0 0.71 011 tT74K-g: • Wf.%tte0164'VP''Flk 01,0*,V4P6:4:2;41P 6 `;‘if.'-'*,k170,--.t",‘"...t-3N-445.1-0,? 0 0.88 0.88 0.88 99 iiltD5COU414,1%.104-0, Protected Phases keth.§:03000W*441/4.1414.6,74--M4k,*SaItitlYli2WAloblie Aivsc4--aq;...a-ko4*AvqkiOs-talti:V-T' Actuated Green, G (s) 5.5 16.7 Actuated gIC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 5.9 17.1 le3.034. 0.05 0.30 0.06 0.31 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 9.6 9.6 0.14 0.14 2.0 2.0 9.6 9.6 0.14 0.14 2.0 2.0 4'OPYWin:if(01.1A.i? Ykt-M5Via,:ft.g.rLkttVgPff;YM.;*OAIVNOA"'):CAii0.iftZ;gqYaij%rah:nNig- vis Ratio Prot 0.06 0.11 if.ig4tOiel*P 1.03 0.37 vlc Ratio c0.07 c0.15 1.05 0.48 d •fiThltIP5ArAII, ,-§,FMAPte,)t,i5NrYadt:44V-V,&;1 4,‘" Progression Factor 1166-00141t. Delay (s) 1.00 r,1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 "IT • . 0.01 0.11 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Approach Delay (s) 1 11 121.3 13.2 35.0 121.3 13.5 33.3 18.0 17.0 17.3 17.3 18.0 17.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio VD:P=0;74' Intersection Capacity Utilization Onggt5VjaraN4;a-ti*f**g*)t*Mr#aktYMrft*ae'SVZGAA.''\i4L 1i Critical Lane Group 0.36 45.2% ICU Level of Service 4.4 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 =„1 Ex + Amb + Project Sun 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations et) 4 •••.; Sign Control Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians Free 0.97 0.97 0.98 Free Stop • 0.98 0.62 0.62 WI -6 A: -_,-i-1,11)44-1V•!'-'11-elf.4 f•-•*?' 37-;.*.V.g4Z04-4-54;,k-Dbadgifit-40$5:--0-7-',!'" Walking Speed (ftls) 2:14F.,(41WW-t na,WAitagMbtAA-TEVIRA''' ..,:::,tirftfVtAtrVM&L6ZWtakta)., Right turn flare (veh), l'AW" '4441AJ-: 114i±g`V Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked . . . -4T:34WT-240$Pras vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol yfrOlt 1.1'-}V157£6A 1-'!* -,`4=.6164-1R4 ;444 ^ - tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 424 98 4>1 721 379 _Loa, ,EVtP421,204, 75 95 „A • Volume Left cSH ,221Te 1700 1146 435 20 ‹.2!... A 98 n1.14WWW-glatai-7401R4-14V,-- Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 31 • ';'Z'AV-NIRM2i-Virt45444,tkii,;144:414:WitMg!K;-404.430-41e4.0310+-:? Lane LOS kta. , A Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period (m n Vn4.% 2.8 15 • -..,..4,0,gek,Ly..,.avf '131SW10,„ 5"4"i_ , .g= KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 9 1 1 Ex + Amb + Project Sun 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICTV Religious Facility , . Lane Configurations Volume (vph) —111. k- 4\ t Ti! •;„ 1 0 6 123 5. 69 42 46 17 10 57 •V}.0:4WkIre4;91tEA. - - 1 -Et kl.ISSM.FA-5.-E4Ifeartt•:14-11V " Hourly flow rate (vph) Volume Total (vph) Volume Right (vph) Departure Headway (s) 51 56 51 77 6.1 5.4 21 14 AVAM, " V-1 WOrt. 77 136 30 14 214 44 166 100 -481111.7\424. 111- 136 9 0 93 6.0 5.1 5.8 5.9 4.8 ..w4,11•;4110-1,11Glifw.T.V'-,,AiimsA4ki-,-AWA,3sWe:w5%,erit-4.4 Capacity (vehlh) 554 626 566 678 580 574 706 Approach Delay (s) 8.1 8.9 • %RV 166 7 93 are 70:Agt:itiAgl$544-5:31-RiVf.,41;4'443:,;.4-iutlges=e- 9,2 9.0 HCM Level of Service tattirVvf-4,15 Analysis Period (min) 15 --"Z" 141-74.7'0 eicit"-74-4W0-4 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 • -- ,,,,, 7.1 APPENDIX E Cumulative Project Information KOA Corporation November 2010 aapment Activities )5 - 06/03110) • 4,9 APPENDIX F Intersection Level of Service Worksheets - Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions Including Roripaugh Ranch Project KOA Corporation November 2010 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility -rfr44- Lane*Wile ConfigurationsgIII ft til f +++ �r 'II ,++ *Wil ova ' s x' it.,1,,,%LA S z c, j h fi Y2 3 y, „�8 t k L &11}.�,r {,�' 1 S �*""i '�53 -�S'+�4>u«. ��,�y`L.:. i.t` `5 a'..L4! t- T - +` f <d'.i."'A �t�� � 6111 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900{ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 "-"` "�`ka v:',_Tt . h i- "E�i en - ova9, Y , -�[` 4.`F'z 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Iftiik..0a4.4.,:kaigiO 0441-11.4M67404,_ • Lane Util. Factor FIpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Jtt h .. nh.,;b AM} .YG PENIA Mtra ggiNSIC 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 gtr 1.00 1.00 1.00 • i 110.401 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) twaZiaitmeite- Protected Phases r-RIMR101.%-h- vet Actuated Green, G ( 0.94 0.94 0.94 163 sr� 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0:90 310 0 0 97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 fire's afeA 10.5 29.3 22.0 14.9 Actuated gIC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 0.06 0.19 vls Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Progression Factor g 0.88 1.5 �x 0.05 0.14 0.09 2.0 1.5 1.5 33.7 20.1- 22.0 52.7 44.6 Eigfi.74R-t-c4 14.9. 20.1 50.8 oESL .�k�^ fA- 0.23 0.13 0.14 0.37 0.09 0.13 0.35 40, 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 i';t"[y [. i `a 3h9 qJ_ 0.18 0.05 c0.08 c0:22 c0.33 0.14 c0.40 0.08 0.22 0.37 0.94 0.37 0.88 0.98 2.59 0.97 1.09 0.85 1.72 1.05 "�� � 'se tA, � ��^.P'��"'�, ��SX�-Fd"�y..�..�1._ :1 s�'3 yy � d ��f-a'�l '�{. �.�. � �-i a�� 'd t3^���• 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Y. _ 1.00 1.00 - b>�.��-�+3t�EA�,3.y�'Z:.3€_+-c.^'t�'. i.N���0,�.+n��`'"Y�'.2;�.0����*`,47,44,1M-,: 95.2 74.5 53.0 84.7. 77.8 790.7 89.1 92.3 96.0 391.7 79.1 72.8 Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 391.6 92.0 168.4 - r3'?`'"tel sfr. HCMVolume to Capacity ratio 1.22 g)tlf_ 4441 giOkk':3 • Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 104.6% ICU Level of Service ;y3 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 ,Y42' *-4.±e,a{c:PtonAKZIV-A.tl&-IANX -441A, Progression Factor :1 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility -"A "\T I 4- k- t \ I4' tilt Lane Configurations -liaait.„.:AaSmM,V1.1M_§Sf614Mkeatoqa-*il.gMIMS)ISiktttgigifiMM4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 • 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 [io •••,?wooftwirtoramtiorgivag,*-k..4, ' arlfavr- -,-.21WXMaMETX-.M...,W,MZEge•-41:- • , 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 1.00 Lane UtiI. Factor ti Flpb, ped/bikes 4U_:: o__o tz,2,41-30 • too 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f•,••= „,„,,,,,temitgammesaavyantagut r -P TAAMIMAI Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 , 424- I. T*400,4:8 r qt..4410.21,441P-0-0101-4,, it:teraf, 0.95 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Itta4A, J A -41-,e0 Avo n Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 aA,V1901))k,r:t*e ge4 .S10 V-7-tQz;34614;g4--ffek, :4114K.-4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 70 qrrotAKia,MA AEI Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 287 257 295 277 169 0.88 0.88 31 41; 630 Protected Phases (Lq4=-0-1614VVWSWIM.041:41"tia Actuated Green, G ( 4:17_ 7E,"4 1,,oe ;El 65.3 65.3 • 4g1,10-404VAiliXre.itAMA.,::- ;1.24.46...I,PAWAGAI 25.0 39.0 39.0 30.0 44.0 44.0 10.4 50.0 50.0 25.7 rov-wgz0a.-14-4,AtviiI-4..v3w4,,tpr&Azyt-v2,44up Actuated gIC Ratio 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.14 0.38 0.38 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 7-aii.§-/VAlertmeiWt&c.RAWaaqqatAari4.4;4i4iF744PAlivaNsfvotOnsag4'74-4-' vis Ratio Prot 4.0 v/c Ratio 0.15 c0.17 c0.17 0.05 e - . 1.13 0.75 0.34 1.01 0.22 0.31 0.04 c0.38 c0.13 0.24 ,5491-14t',.S..rAtar•Vt4ni., 'IMATIT'VEy.` 4% 0.81 1.33 0.91 0.94 0.62 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) 167.9 71.0 57.1 101.2 48.2 49.6 101.7 208.7 77.5 96.3 41.2 34.7 Approach Delay (s) 104.0 83.3 176.9 52.9 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.11 Intersection Capacity Utilization 'AT4,-,KOTAPSMIRAT::,;:;,t12., Critical Lane Group 110.6% ICU Level of Service -40* KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations • '211E [Apt.;,,itgi, -• c 4-- 4,- 4\ t \ 1, _ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -4aust.,4~,m,Rmt-m-A-0:tamow&ww-v- V,''"Atif,A114471.VtKot;144:1-31p.--Zr--"" '',iw:r*Wrhyti&w.f* • mft. 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 ?TATO OlvF Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected 4 u c Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 • • • 1.00 1.00 1.00 ;71", A.P=1'7:4°Nr:41701V5aq`.'tYMT 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.19 1.00 Artpt .-C,WCepat 0.95 1.00 KWATL.::; • 0.71 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.53 0.53 0.53 , About 41K Maxt,--4,6 4x,? -Ir twn-V-4-*V.-ftia0 RTOR Reduction (vph) Conti. Peds. (#/hr) ",144Z1::::-Avittkv 11 43 309 0 g,nt-Satt70.,PAilnqesliT*iMA.4,1w 14 81 gjf:"WICT-OZP:atirA*te4 t,I.T7AV4-444.VITA' %.4:iiii-44%103W-UtittR/VArgirtifiaiDVAViV-, Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 25.1 49.7 0.22 0.47 k. • 4.0 28.6 32.1 32.1 32.1 32.1 0.01 0.26 0.29 0.29 ir-4:165.4.M1fAti-tfait4004:-#.44'4,kef4101-`3%.4.4:-.:ig • 0110.g..C.O.RiEF0S7*4'4..f.-.5-Paik-1, 0.29 0.29 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 4.0 1.5 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio c0.22 c0.34 0.02 0.20 0.98 0.72 1.89 0.77 Milti:V3.4-440A*,4-P10.*4 p_q* 0.01 -a-54070Pk,Urigrlfk-olKiali. 0.68 0.05 0.11 0.40 0.36 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) 78.7 22.9 603.0 38.7 43.6 25.4 28.6 28.2 Approach Delay (s) TP 36.6 64.5 35.0 28.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 piffogsmowitim.oftux.„., *141,--aar Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.6% ICU Level of Service .1.7M-tqVj.fif,-44-4-..lft0t.ni:l;Wf:.40t'*S•q-4.V.ZVf#ZSijeni.5ttf*Vf7tPtakt4:'-A-V-ak;--' -P Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 . • - Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility -"` c 44— 4\ /6* • Lane Configurations 't+ 4 icir Sign Control Free Free Stop Zintrilatag.011940024akit-M Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.90 0.90 0.42 0.42 "q3'1'..„44-tplepiW14-29P4r- L- • , . Pedestrians ViltiNaitokr "44 41.t. 'aMtfr"1111Pat e7t4s." 44, tY-Alf.W Walking Speed (Ns) Right tum flare (veh) rt;,Vlb • 4-f., ,111`Z' • r} • - aittiiVIVAMORMIlhttkaUttc Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol o ,:4,ii61160wW4titwr.4;4,4, tC, 2 stage (s) .T'llON4-*Z1 p0 queue free % 1176 100 1986 • 4,1., - •-*4-"Falyg .P.V4 , • . „ 1176 100 100 00, ye Volume Left 0 0 0 ,z*,71A4Vilir cSH Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS. 1700 A.. 601 1700 A 5-,71PA- •PV: Approach LOS A Average Delay ‘R',!4-1fiN7k'':igeOcatt,ca0-,!-Ii,*&7;f3,st Analysis Period (min) 15 ,4,-.44,ydrwa 0.0 VtXfv,->it; WAY035-..- x ;„ „t"1.-71eXip 440'4'9 ."441&-'11-,'tr..411.1*-1 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICN Religious Facility Lane Configurations 1 T.} 'I t+ 4) 1 t ic0.614it fi 4.aS.d.traa*adriagratM;,-k-ikaVg.MP.:.:..04-A'W.---WANH.6.3V4iaOt:g.t.M--Vk.',-,A▪ 9Hfitfts;AP-4-`,tiw:-41v.WA:StYP,2,d:-V;-Mf, 150 141 41 10 134 175 35 8 6 159 17 152 t,,,, .s.,..„iz. -.. . ,1- ° qat.glittligratfifeMOVA: 174 51 11 152 199 42 10 7 187 20 - 179 Volume (vph) Hourly flow rate (vph) Volume Total (vph) ° Volume Right (vph) Departure Headway (s) 185 ;.. : , ' . • • •••., ; ; • 185 225 11 351 58 187 199 0 51 0 199 0 179 = akagYa4P-.?...W• &IV* 7.0 6.3 7.1 6.1 7.4 7.2 6.1 • ik',4**-4.:-OrrieW.06-0-Alm,--1.-10,P.,A14;131-24„i3i7Arigt-Aft9,44-41M.Atii -'.14-2,41-Cfrwi.-.OLVAtrias ' - =`,.%`• Capacity (vehih) 493 Approach Delay (s) 1 2.3 547 482 16.5 556 426 470 11.4 12.1 556 --. HCM Level of Service i.,iXANgTiA141.-011414-14.,:z5,2d;&0*,t4,7...4 Analysis Period (min) 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility f 4, Lane Configurations ++ r 11 ft ' Ft+ r fft) ,r,. 411. Wt-egraV.4.1 4.P434h4.Y,WarifigeriW4Laqi.-Ir4"6 ,.g•0 -.V 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 WafaiSto • Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes 711:44,445069-4-, Fit Protected 6 - Fit Permitted 1=-W. 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 taire'" 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 •P.= 42% - '*1 _ ,VivZ 0.91 cAgi-VO:.&4 "Xwti':,t5Pitt.t7,1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 14,t; Varirti- 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 '101VIN, !%t-f:r -111P7MOVAIMINSIIMMATIMANI, -;r%t' 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 MeffreffV.AvOnfrows-40 Apv .Stiktk .;.!4,4014-Z4.g_tVitA40,i74. 0.95 • 1.00 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF vrulptio6m5ov-4',* RTOR Reduction (vph) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.98 098 0.88 202 309 ,2,74,743rAgtititelY,7 196 0.88 0.88 0 OTAN'gAgijitASVUPPIA6145,'4,,:kaingAVA `;14'0DiAlt, '66*".4)''',Ii4-170V3Y1014,-0. Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 11 004 ilkFigEfiNfitk}Nial" el: z-eatTarxie4V, atzn-,1,steijsAP,') Proteded Phases Actuated Green, Green, G (s) 10.0 22.2 10.7 13.4 25.6 20.2 10.7 41.0 13.4 20.2 50.5 44-42APACTS-...1- 2 ''qita3M--44',W-'.;141kAtia,Zna*ZitiAt3.44,6-it,W •NAQ T,VZ474,';:4-laairtitalziOW-1,4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.17 0.07 0.09 0.20 0.15 0.07 0.33 0.09 0.15 24RQfrAit-ARViA444,10-Mget-MAP•faii0ft:4:A.;,, •,d 41',44-1-4001WW014a4 • 0.41 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 A46-iirzsitAtigact#14104106:41,464AWK, USWAIM,V":Varf4r,tn-_114411:43.1gPV4filat.55AMNORM. 0.05 c0.15 0.02 c0.08 c0.11 0.11 0.06 0.19 0.01 c0.19 c0.38 vis Ratio Prot vIc Ratio Progression Factor 0.85 0.91 0.31 1 Delay (s) ; I4.401t*J.17:0R-0.,31VOteMS1net. ,e44,{1,14,11TC 4:;k*, 0.90 0.55 0.75 0.86 0.58 0.13 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 77.7 65.1 51.6 77.1 42.1 58.0 77.6 32.4 48.2 .29 0.91 .00 1.00 192.9 38.3 rr-4 7.,'1:11,Vi:tr:_ffg.74-•;'!1,-,L-"*11-•?-f,2',•:-.-:1=-114V47J-T-:';'-‘e;:-1.4;:t4t27-44-':**-'.k:-U.A4ta,niVeziAlittfIMr.:itiOgY Approach Delay (s) 64.1 57.3 FICIVI Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 are, 41:1‘49,,:fsk`tt-g- drpi(Alri intersection Capacity Utilization at-IriteMfAU:4,4•*0-&10.--7.= - c Critical Lane Group 83.9% ICU Level of Service 41.3 ..gfV . 78.3 qel KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations r eirctd.410..41„: r 11) Mt re in tttt r '110' • Wiff4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • 4,44-V -Mt7.-4M0.RMYiei0W6Wat • Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 ' - ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .71. 1.00 , Ak.,! 49-"Vjeag WA- 4 Y Flt Pt roected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 git(.41-0A ,t7.1 . , 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 St, -,..:dortor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.77 • 0.77 .44 . . Airil.:770W40.9jgg'Zift.M.Gt,i-P-1.44-41.4.1q,' RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 0.77 0.90 169 0.90 0.90 0.88 276 IL 0.88 0.88 r'% 11461 "V.r 3:10 faimitelarigidNaW 3 8 -• Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) jrtr..6=a zitav---2vorrAge44---.44„,;,- 5.5 46.8, :46.8 18.2 59.5 59.5 Actuated gIC Ratio 25.1 40.2 40.2 26.9 42.0 42.0 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.26 0.26 0.02 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.38 0.38 ,A44-441-7:2*.W.V.?A Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 :itiRRiariAM, 444, v/s Ratio Prot fro-41,r-rNt- ),,:x4.4zi,-.10,-DVa-Y.:c v/c Ratio AROV.10.*04!,ig: .1aIg14 2 „cc* v 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - • 0.01 0.01 'Ft! 0.06 0.02 0.02 ' . -Naraf: 4 v-tiYilswit:Ail*ctookyfqx---f-44,0. -atv9,-ge c0.15 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.97 0.03 0.14 0.88 0.68 0.14 Progression Factor Delay (s Approach Delay (s) c0.09 c0.25 : 0.91 0.67 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 55.4. 42.8 42.7 86.3 41.4 42.7 147.2 46.5 76.0 48.2 39.3 92.5 49.1 39.8 29.3 n2W45.07 48.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54 -. --- ,-----,ci -5--,04.- - -0,---c-4-ay.Pi'lWil-gR41-00r-e4---" . '4' • e„ -,T.**-, - * '.. $1,-4 ,.:,,iffkak:4,%01 !f-.. ',- Intersection Capacity Utilization C-.016MWArgiA2-441,4fr c Critical Lane Group 84.5% ICU Level of Service A 4-gfalgfi _4P4,421-: . E KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 ."::1 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor C `` t P t t i f bt-#0...,.�- WSJ 1900 1900 1900 1900 , 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 € tY�g'_�'x.' , 1.00 1.00 1.0 0 1.00 ro `Eb�h4�ad��AL 4� 444i$o aA-A 6 E; m3 40 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0 6 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 �,i^n-. «�.: 5��._..'.x,-ssk"�-.�i..r z_,✓tea 0.95 1.00 0.95 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 n. 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.74 1.00 MFR 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.88 0.88 0.88 CIA RTOR Reduction (vph) Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 0 We 'Ix 24 101 2 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 6 5 4 6.0 22.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 0.06 0.37 1.5 4.0 2 6.5 22.9 0.07 0.38 9.6 0.13 9.6 0.13 1.5 4.0 2.0 2.0 9.6 8 9.6 0.13 0.13 2.0 2.0 vis Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Progression Factor 0.06 0.13 0.98 0.36 1.00 1.00 c0.07 c0.22 0.99 0.58 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.32 0.02 1.00 1.00 miookome- 0.01 0.24 0.10 1.00 1.00 t. e,.: G4-e,yi ', t-aN1, aaE' ' r t ? ' - huWvA P ''w . 5-011, , iter a Delay (s) 103.7 106.7 12.3 13.7 21.3 20.1 v z tt ?jY' ?.;A[� iw fir fff,. a`a ,�.::!- - .... .=-1r ,t'ZW: -1w - __.n 'R mow- lie i-zA-- '�` � - -4?- s -�; �, .�: �". �, � �t3� �',� � tet:= Approach Delay (s) 28.6 25.5 21.0 20.4 20.9 20.5 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 50410-1054 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.4% ICU Level of Service • Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations APS -41-. Sign Control r'rtf-'4" Peak Hour Factor Free • 8' 0.97 4 Free Stop 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.62 r1.10v-triM1P1 ';41°W;ZP4'.4.:AtZkURGI, '7,z111 Pedestrians AtWAD:14VOINItitigow-* Walking Speed (ftls) ,a91.1A-MAIL Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) ,.:10F.4(1141.5.11144z, pX, platoon unblocked Acret*t. ItigeSIX:f431 %AUL* 1.4 ;.:iy,:f;40.11,Altitt004:WAVV4Staliteihig-VAlentirlarViat4-00.-WAsti; ',t'Ult?:4154.*144t4;*., vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) 'A> 4:"IMCi''47:ATALf*/", f-cli-VrPt4 350 900 335 hre=1:17:Alf-r-air:54'4441'4.43r'it;11--'44$9; AitditT''F4RNI.44'4Er ,IP.;n4QMORRI-40F4POW*N.0014M5Ng-MWL:TARAP---,405!%,=ieigs*A_ p0 queue free % 100 Volume Left 99 100 Ac,711;t4.*,418v-44?-40,10,1A441,5,0-742. 71,;_;51? °Ili. eirl' 7:03. cSH 1700 1220 311 42Pi:O.M&A-1344.745,04,0teatiVMP;[kAtAvti- Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS Ag4,14-A.A. ;AP: VatriaL4*, . _ Approach LOS Average Delay 0.1 f'ilW=41V41.iaatlUiqiftg-ki-*jtnrjgcAAfVVdl-Wqgf'/iPd0'e44aiWAWft, Analysis Period (min) 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 1 • Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations eja-Alce i-ko4 44 90 17 Volume (vph) k*K-WiiVh roe - ; Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 44 *I T4 122 98 19 3 6 125 5 6 !. ,v,..7. 169 110 21 14 165 132 30 5 96 Volume Total (vph). .TkIt.i*P9RD Volume Right (vph) Departure Headway (s) 54 130 21 14 297 !,411'1K315.,- 169 136 132 9 0 130 ..:0•04A1 VairrittliyargWfi'MW4Wiv. • t 6.4 5.8 6.3 5.4 6.3 6.4 5.2 46z ciAlriA1-404.MINA- Atie.pqr oxt:,41m1,31,Aohtlialn.x.ft Atir4,4010444_ Capacity (veh/h) 528 588 546 637 !S.ANR*-Oji:4t''Nl_A."ZAOY3fireg,=:jraf,RM-l*;VXZ;j:4.,e:,Nf-akk-Vk,VYAV-A;;.‘.jerg:Y,Xa-c'P:ai 522 534 646 Approach Delay (s) 9.0 11.4 9.8 9.7 , 4 HCM Level of Service Analysis Period (min fasaltiftft=77-N-!,.. A 15 KO- KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility With Project f s' 4- Lane Configurations VI ++ r in 44 11) tt4 r ill 440 .40,11iNelNO,tx- . - ,temw,. ,,_•,,,.,.*,,,.,,,. Aw wu 7ANSAVI:41r-i•enta deal Flow (vphpl) 1900 -1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ailf.441.1i.Mil.40.- vaCtlillii4- , blar ; ',3.4--; Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 INU:EjtatNiMMINO.Ada-Vit0..ig4t,t;gril,4144.ARMVSAirittAk4-04tP Flpb, ped/bikes +441P'4 It`IS,Wq;* -Wax, Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4be 1=4 kattf: "40-SittiO 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 liadUrgaira--,r r::)9141tage#A4Maktafia-: 7`f=efitA: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00 IV-4PFtY ni(1,,44:4,-Mig.-gatkr44,41 F4' Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Cant Peds. (#/hr) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 4;g1.11 -44,4.W 10:41X44-MWt4V4C-4461''AiiZtitt ff.".C1: 163 310 95 6,0 Te0,-;Ire;'S.-'':•;=.40-7,411,5MONWatei,Y..tAi4-4471i.WW67-MaajtagttNaliar-WP -?24-;44,44540t: 1 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 29.3 22.0 15.1 33.9 20.1 22.0 52.7 15.1 20.1 50.8 Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 1 5 2 3 6 Actuated /C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 0.06 0.19 0.14 0.09 0.23 0.13 0.14 0.37 0.09 0.13 0.35 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 se',114k,„ 1.5 4.0 :i16-'.3M4WiliA0-MN'At.V,PAUTOWragg-WittNAggidAtMat.Paial-4:,,,;JW4NNVIRAZ vis Ratio Prot 0.05 0.18 0.05 c0.08 c0.22 00.33 0.14 c0.41 0.08 0.22 0.38 -4ft'Wlkt5t,t*,MRNiAai'eAN:--IB::?AtgT,eaAMgrLiIra,gYgWgilrr:!A W 0.88 0.94 0.37 0.87 0.97 vlc Ratio 2.61 0.97 1.12 0.85 1.72 1.08 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Defay (s) 96.7 74.8 53.1 82.6 76.7 796.4 89.6 103.4 94.8 393.5 71: Approach Delay (s) 73.3 393.3 100.4 89.0 174.5 = HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.23 intersection Capacity Utilization 105.5% ICU Level of Service Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Wit^ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility With Project Lane Configurations .'410;1` Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Uti! Factor 11- t/0. \* 1 r + r !pi tilt re tilt 1900 19.00 1900 1900 1900K 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 100 10001.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 1.00 *# e st v� zG e4iti `§; rfa :1 °av : Ren i. Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Flt Permitted rk�wys. � 1.00 1:000, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3`'�i -s 7 s' a ter 4 w `- EF,a ttAcG 6t 9 s 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.04 =-i Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 70 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 271 300 31 287 295 169 630 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 25.0 39.0 39.0 30.0 44.0 44.0 10.4 50.1 50.1 26.5 66.2 66.2 10ring",�s.��` -��'..�,.%..C4tak.3'Vigt@3'_.. �' .Mg;m�'r�� PWOz�„�i.DY00:04MieAs�Z.:KA 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.14 0.39 0.39 Actuated glC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 vis Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Progression Factor 0.15 c0..17 114 0.76 0.34 00.18 0.05 0.04 c0.38 c0.14 0.24 ,446.61,0 1.09 0.22 0.33 0.82 1.33 0.99 0.95 0.62 0.24 170.1 71.7 57.6 125.3 48.7 50.3 102.9 211.0 956 97.2 41.0 34.5 7'r cfi �Ff �.��r��� ���'�!"'" ,- �'�y�'� �`" � �.� �`� ice• �7� -��' �r+x�r� � �s '�' e `" � �'� r''"+ �_ Approach Delay (s) 105.3 99.8 181.0 53.2 �;aViF HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12 ?Y }�o��J� ���i�G1�49 '� � � �'• i4�= ��� A'.' 'gyp ��'3� Intersection Capacity Utilization 1 11.8% ICU Level of Service (K� I.*i'n1.+2c-AM. sem'-- "�..• -,..rfp;f45b,sia -rc_ �a�•,F ..y. � � ;. Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility With Project C t 4, Lane Configurations fit. ) 114) 1 Ts. 1 T+ rkelbati,,..i. . ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ,_ •.. 4.014P-RagistWO , ,„:::-Vii,,-„,,,.....•;.. all.y.,,,, .,,,,_..-,..,-,41..,...g...-• ,z,....„,_ ','• V.,413..;A•1-1•1=0:.,,-.1.:-F,*,,4 -•-•,Azz,L.,,,x4.1 .,- , -;---- --.-', -.:*-7..tr.og,i,-,;.,,r.A--,,,..4,-,14i6%...,,,:,s,,,, 1.00 0.95 ---,,w.,--- • .1--0•0.k 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Util. Factor ,f1,04,0.-04*-41A40*--- Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 eNdic -: SAIMMAIROS31:IfatellalkgritaNMAL: $11 SP Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 t-.:V101-AJMNI ti-liVAMIAS2111: gtelglificalLWAP&WW'al, ' ' - , -A.,".-)-2. --• Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.71 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 0.81 A4,44.4azeci, 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.53 0.53 0.53 11 ViAaratiVi --CY`74aftli4k1A4.144;-VA,16aPjk 43 0 312 MRW-Q*4.& 14 81 a4s',r0---E!,:alaggiiovzo Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) q.q4V4-47sKaRo: Actuated gfC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) it;PzitliP Al* 25.1 52.1 4.1 31.1 .y•-••.. e 'F. • '0,440VINK-M.4.4,144&,' ft.;•Sf , 0.22 0.48 1.5 4.0 0.01 0.27 .104.440.10-: - 1.5 4.0 32.1 32.1 32.1 32.1 442-it,,A0,49-av:44*-;%7-44o4,Jon,151M1,14, 0.28 0.28 2.0 2.0 0.28 0.28 2.0 2.0 Nik,'W.Mita.414V440414.0 -q`C' "71-"fitr,Wh• •`V15'.'r ,r:&.!‹"M. v/s Ratio Prot :=5 5 vk Ratio kellara-Mikaib4 Progression Factor c0.22 c0.36 •Vika:,, 1.01 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.02 0.22 '745T- "4.'5 5104.4143%5"ai5.'” 1.79 0.78 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.75 0.05 0.41 0.10 0.36 •"555‘ • 4•4-"Vi'',g'1,!.:,3s-filVP4t---*-k-SaffetrIgl-7Ntx,44--,2-„,_/441..m,' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1"L'•-.'47-PIROWW-tiik**-44,4-18,W.Wiy;e1M5,kiiggitiltiZ):VdMi;i4Cit,_8-Mr:41aWe.44! Delay (s) 87.6 23.4 556.6 38.7 58.2 26.6 30.0 29.4 Approach Delay (s) 38.5 60.5 43.3 29.5 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.1% 'ids-Itj-Kligfi-NRQTA•44,4,..it,;;;Aiiatiftelk.etikf*Ar;r414iiRtgaitarNribti4411,1_0i;430g..;:itOSikt c Critical Lane Group ICU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility With Project Lane Configurations fttalS'-'''r41 14 - Free Sign Control Peak Hour Factor 440 'AV`WMFIWA:4,,,likirakid*-31W;2",*740Alitn -:04,117n.--:,t4V-EViOA:WW:beptMV.,4k.ragt42z)71::i Pedestrians .47 4 Free Stop P 0.78 0.78 0.90 0.90 0.42 0.42 --"Afvf •-•#.4 regtvawit Walking Speed (ft/s) anaLlattiik Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) t.I.ORrei6"_Cifjlet.0.31.710?".A.:iik-Vk.-i;:33,-A-4VAI:f.L-WAW::;;X:.-V-46.-.0e-h#14-4%•-f-4(5' ARM 01;-4ra-ttea- pX, platoon unblocked !el yr 2ci'.."-zIttAkkilaVli'dlitek-f.'4:'*4- vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1251 2068 1213 Mf.qf.M.VaZif4:-.i-$ZN',-a_.I.ZtW.AIRS.tet*:ZW--AAMA*N#'gai4'tic4kTkAkSN*:MMS.Ma tC, 2 stage (s) n4fittiiPsff-iFt401-1-4,-::7 p0 queue free % 96 80 Volume Left 0 22 136 Vigttg.iAig.„C4=7:i:V:j*:iatAiy2-itAgjXtgMi.iAfikka:iW"Ai4ZV-VfPAie'':4;1iaiii;tlt4V''.'W-IA;ftittaa;.:!":rV't cSH 1700 563 71 Queue Length 95th (ft) ft Lane LOS 0 3 439 A F '7- ; • Approach LOS F Average Delay 66.2 rig'f----f'tjaVik3rAr.iijgek4-t8VF-4Dtlgn't;M.Vtral,z'*fsa.V-iaigPZ-V:4UtifiVSridt4-ASiigfW,4 Analysis Period (min) 15 ';si,'UtlYittaigiitVIOz;zAiriftfSV'fegtV;-fA41iivf-:iz;'IC;_W--ig-A?;:ge)-ftfg=tva KOA Corporation Synchro 7- Report Page 4 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICTV Religious Facility With Project " • Lane Configurations ,fr • - )0gagROKI*M-45-&4, Volume (vph) s 162 141 41 10 134 181 =,---60.:..-Ve:144441,41A,„! Houdy flow rate (vph) 200 174 35 t \•• 1, Volume Total (vph) 451-Wq,10*-Trz::63,7- Volume Right (vph) 200 ;',1•11 . 51 11 152 206 42 10 225 11 358 51 0 206 0 4A 58 194 213 Departure Headway (s) 7.1 6.4 7.2 6.3 W=-zi'4;VW;tt?bVc.M;tfigJff'.*t-tAe.,,4l4SaXI;*_:gki.rAq0e4-YgM:jlftfW=girWaitiigtt-.46 475 548 7.5 193 7.3 6.2 165 17 164 194 20 193 0670-41iWail Capacity (veh/h) Approach Delay (s) 487 539 418 466 12.9 17.6 11.6 12.6 551 • HCM Level of Service Analysis Period (min 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7- Report Page 5 te :0 i k'.°F� m ie 2 3 ' $ ; it a : Y #r - .i`. `€ Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 i." 4 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICN Religious Facility With Project Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 4- t )111 ft r 'i" ++ i' +•+ 'i +ft* 'uxay ,� � S �xr�.r` CCA �Jvi si's r, a ' . E" ^:� } . � 1- 1tz i .G a t a 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 as °tea Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 qxSS� p �� ,� y P p ry q h°4`'�rLfY �a `1G -1f � �'G.V�I�-:``p,}�' S .N iq V "'0: C -`$. ° L `7;G` p.�V F Z¢ ro: fi' V �.1 0 tl W 4 V fi' �' kik'-?��-s 5�.. ��r v,C :s ��..��:', � "i�".c�.� �� .��r�` 5... ��,�.�'�alri �� ��� � ,� �� E' @, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 _ isAs'ti vim= ,- , tMU: ®--- 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Fipb, ped/bikes Fit Protected f�- Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 litMINISTEP 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 0.84 0.84 0 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.88 0.88 0.88 202 308 191 „ G-. Aye[ s����5:,: 0 ��� -•�� � Wig, � � ;��.. ��- � ,� ° �. x , ,11 10 11 4 Protected Phases 7 4 5 ..€%- ta ariiiiiids14_}'max, i�'�a�`-%e� -�A ��T-.. •sem}�.. yz 3 t riaj° ri paq1. 0 4sa ,} Actuated Green, G (s) 8 5 3 1 6 10.0 22.2 10.7 13.4 25.6 20.2 10.7 41.0 13.4 20.2 50.5 !-4):' j P!TiSi'i igA:M:: {,1 X,0 `° ` 4 -3' i;ANsect "? EW g 0.06 0.17 Actuated glC Ratio 0.07 0.09 0.20 0.15 0.07 0.33 0.09 0.15 0.41 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 v/s Ratio Prot v/c Ratio 0.05 c0.15 0.02 c0.08 c0.11 0.11 0.06 0.20 0.02 c0.19 c0.39 0.85 0.91 0.31 0.90 0.55 0.76 0.86 0.61 Progression Factor 3 0.17 1.29 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) 77.7 65.1 51.6 77.1 42.1 58.8 77.6 32.9 48.4 192.9 40.8 rLi . �. �� -�° �y � '``` � ��,�"� �'��'ia ���'3j%� r�j� '�� ���+� ,*�+� '�. �1 "��-�� �� " l .,mat � �s-�, wv:� �- 5. �, � �m'� � `�� � ,r'•� �<�,E,r:Pa Approach Delay (s) 64.1 57.6 41.4 79.4 i 7 �G v..+�� .,r ...�,n� ,_.� k2,• �.�� , �� � r���ct�� `ki.�� '-;f:Ci�.i4t�.>..k>.. �' �r� .� .? Xv�"_�:��ax- g �.eA��.:Lrit HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.8% ••,- fit* tiVii4eNnitAc.4124-ii4.4ft,Se,PAate.e ICU Level of Service E c Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 Report Page 1 14' 1 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility With Project -DP P Lane Confguratiops irt 11' )1111111 'i ttft -P4V. 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 zr,>-;.**--'44t.•za ip.044,7434 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 1.00 6.41m, 4,o,-;,;4%.11,7473, iett-af,i1D 4tV rq:5* Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4, aegitiltVIWAUSIMPWILIIAli Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Wertnig-ft,Z20-Wit'" Talt 'MO '0.411 tIA;Z, 4,1„;,,WilstavOU 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 :17;je;A-Itfi'd- .'"',7!-).--.4:414,Ai,1ek5Zro P•i9-i:liila#10-5.,;-0:%106i1M61Akcf-,frA vAs_. pse :11M110 ' fr;- .111" 1.00 1.00 Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.67 0.67. 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 4FA-Vjg;k:AqFWATtiAlligta- Vik,Y=E40112M:ft-ififixag!**,;.1100M3WtNitn-,7103AMVirOA UDR Reduction (vph) 0 0 19 eLiar:4VXi'Yif.3"W?gn-X?0611NV4kri;-10!W404rTAEW Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 0 0 182 0 0 311 3 0 0 3 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 25.1 39.2 39.2 29.5 43.6 43.6 5.6 47.6 47.6 19.2 61.2 61.2 git.*-igh-ViN,q;'gtgzV:gt;a:VMCAeN"-l"1"4'*AAVj*"5-lii*:MaeiGkir4;±AkW.FitiaiiZE''Sg:W 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.02 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.38 0.38 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 Actuated gIC Ratio 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 vis Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 vlc Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) c0.17 0.01 0.01 0.20 c0.10 c0.25 ;arianigt:PlIatitt OtatMtif:OZNR840--AdA7414M-::-.40, g 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.96 0.03 0.15 0.86 0.69 0.15 0.92 0.66 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 57.1 45.1 45.1 83.4 41.8 43.3 143.8 49.4 40.6 94.3 40.3 29.7 Approach Delay (s) 48.7 73.9 49.9 49.4 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 viik.M.*:-00:7470.X.ittiOM%1:--1#.0014R,100' ,,,ZtTegcROMI-TaligOge7q541 intersection Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group E KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpi) Lane Util. Factor 'it+ 1900 1900 b`tl 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes Fit Protected Flt Permitted Peak -hour factor, PHF x.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 ICN Religious Facility With Project ft+► t 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 `�1900 1�K59` 0-40- ,190Q 19 .. 0SiS0 19 9. 00 1.00 0.95t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CLiik 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 MORIKUM - 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 m spa e.l 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 w�, _ �-i.� � � ���. ��,�5'� � '�� k ;. `�� �::�6e�-�.f�;s s am. ��`:"5��a✓>. a '� s @ % :'max Conft. Peds. (#/hr) 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 102 Protected Phases F 111`b5 a iiy 4. 4- k VV 5 0 sg�pc ., «tea c ua s 6.2 24.7 A f tedGreen, G( ) Actuated gIC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 0.06 0.39 1.5 4.0 6.7 25.2 0.07 0.40 1.5 4.0 9.7 9.7 0.12 0.12 2.0 2.0 X, a5. v. te �. 9.7 9.7 0.12 0.12 2.0 2.0 v/s Ratio Prot �. vlc Ratio Progression Factor 0.06 0.15 0.96 0.39 1.00 1.00 c0.07 c0.24 0.98 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.33 0.02 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 �i;3�� 1`��{}t���,F*�.�'��z�t€���4.-�`€� ��`.��a•',�n�.hr€f5�1 63��r','~�,�. L���.���'� j���'^�$�>�°.�5 Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 100.7 12.2 25.9 101.7 13.7 22.6 21.3 22.2 21.6 24.4 22.2 21.8 INN HCM Volume to Capacity ratio ,•Wr tiAsw Via¢.,?? s5tr fl til 3 -. Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.46 52.0% ICU Level of Service c Crifical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Coiibri ICTV Religious Facility With Project Lane Configurations .01P-4-700AN--4- Sign Control Peak Hour Factor IMP-aMili-A. '4 -PA Pedestrians Mtil 'F 44P - Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) flL pX, platoon unblocked --••• te- Free 0.97 0.97 41. 4 V '1V1.4:6WRAWAV = Free Stop :loot - • 241/41.WVA, * ;:f 0.98 0.98 0.98 17' • 0.62 V•X :%54470.1"'ia -.2WV`,A.'" • 42Z -M , AttrIni, kr-1.15:441142 •01.44ew-Terftr''''89-1,,,,t"' •,;e ,1-4114.41kafke--5.14,-".fi-_ vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 410 971 365 giiitWafik,M41410-75WP: IC, 2 stage (s) LE-43,-AtWhik.1 4f5ttfr p0 queue free % Volume Left cSH y4:40firalw?toz Queue Length 95th (ft) igiA* Lane LOS 98 20 62 1700 1160 348 27 78 95 WMTA-4.-2Prerr‘T'-;:',7nAir.::#t 47,Z,VtLVt';.:10 Approach LOS Average Delay 41:6.&10ii,•Nwpigk. ,futigmextstafammt%4ftRv Analysis Period (min ,4,4140. d,ZN;:ztb-4VVafiW-f5-:V-TK. =;°'' avs,i44t. Rtetialfir KQA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Sun 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln Lane Configurations Volume (vph) —11b 56 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4Fiktr131. 90 17 10 122 104 19 Volume Total (vph) Volume Right (vph) Departure Headway (s) 68 110 21 14 165 ICTV Religious Facility With Project -o 5 108 Ve.A '-'10111a 141 30 5 9 177 7 146 68 130 44 177 153 14 305 0 0 141 21 6.5 5.9 6.4 NIFIS tz$4.-kfliAi.1 4 5.5 146 6.4 6.5 5.3 3%,4-rijageiP:.‘',..i1A-04-ARIre*:;;Yetgqtr.A-%!Ialtn.4WgariEWAV4:1V.:4gti?NleiVe-IW 521 577 536 627 511 527 639 9.2 Capacity (veh/h) )Q, Approach Delay (s) 12.0 9.9 10.0 HCM Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) %.;:17A;2:'-'-cret:MiierkAKZiatatialfgalil-454404-AiSnitag'Vtgtitlit6Art4,145TIN44-i: 15 KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 IIIII.1IiiiiI1HIii1!h•;; lilut ir', big I3 ttfaI1111 'wlI 1 -1111111TH IIII1 1. =•_- hi!IIIII;IIIi • .: I �1 II1n1'II11LJ1111'.in1111 I: III L !!!klIIIIIIIIII1 IIIiirtEIM �II1iihI11OC111111 mo■■Eiiue.ai4.1111prwoll u1■■r■ pmq��ike moen111110111111■■■■1e■ � memi1io■ip■■ie■■■o■ .mmirm ipil !iIIIIrim..!V•IIIP!I•!III Ii"InIHhILiIit1IJHuIH ilinFielligillinlinililli mummatimmimpAmommumminimmin mnsiaorrnmvcimmosuiWimmlmmoomm JociIocar3midi■eoo■ptmilit+t:�aassi■■ r gill' i 1 °1.r s o iz a .W414i s"; i (! EUEIOF-: gi 11111 iali Igig4 •01 mg -ill! iiagE b6 to f .1x, }}..ypy z( F N` 7 W iJ SFy� 4 Q ; ~ a d !! f 3 IJ 6,66 1666.-F.vcotg.am6.. 0000€ ca®®®®®o®®®®®®®o c ®®o®®® Ga 10 40+8 E.F`E3 �T-'s�A}",`��� �')R�19?..1�a) 00 4-0 MIS kaltpHONEM 21,01 N3 oo ..« 34,01 1S! 001601 a 70Y1.5 OI NIYJ3a 013 M4=0 141 .5076. [BIZ WeiVi l+1*. 1ENLIM r; a'3atr1 n c i r • 11 A011 00 11,71,+06 LI10Nafll Si19 MN - Wan TAM 11N3 i3 .00r9=to OL'lb+06 I Men GNa 1 STER ' • A t .11914.1.41-1111 statavaa auno ate Ll ;Y8'LB WOL+2S 1 (lD'f601} Vkin Annan e+rs3a r r r • d iliggSiA SVEIrig5 ggE 5iga g - q a • g 2E't.E2giir- Ex 8t5_ tq'irl- g 1 6, g ,- i isiii OW PP §giligVieo 100 0. . roNi011iq;.:!igi0.E22'2220,. ;.,..... g .ix.olgEJEI a a g Ei4 igi n 4 b t 6 t a g gE a Hw . v a a a a a g Milli i iiiiiiiiiig 111111111 �®®® ®@©®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® 0 11,0019 .1.1 ,00190 69.19 .1.1 .0009 r L6 62111 N IE •JI 00 £ 'ON 9010 L V06. L 00 ft 209 99' +£6 111,94 019199136 110610 11 .0099 99£94£6 STO1W-ti@ 01 0 901 V-Za 143:4-1 I ;;11;1•101.1 1 i 1 ■■■■.■!!!!! . 1111161 1111111MENMEM L_. a ; i g$;! g 3 185- gqiIi2 ,4gf m� mai gil �a6� ..3 a 0e®0€®®000®®®®®® w �1C�Io7 ������®�1+� ,t—dfgR.; 5gz.io 4 2 9 .! a w 3 3 t .4EIER ggg.gxgE 2 § §§ zigEZ igg§ ecxxxxx)(Deogoo® 1 A 41 CD z ZO cq g 1 z 71 431 0 1 os crisici• a COI 63.00+41. S2131410 AS , AVM.11.91.113arana kedY1.1PX.1493 11 ,00!99 Zalt+ZI L ON £1.1V+13 31 EL7.601: 100 r 31 96603i 18 Arra ;.f °.7 P. rk- .0 ��T���� �1L�3�� tiOa•£V10+15 W REMOVE AND SALVAGE SIGN 5 �C 1111111111111111 CXXXXX ocoNc Hcoo®® it 4 I S Et6"illi ! oe®®o® o@® ?Zr+cc wis 1,i4 (,r ;4741'11111 1 `,� er' � 5s t7 °e - 0 g o J 777-0 Rye SIGNING AND SIR NF Yp = ! SO 15 aoan I w2 MK xb g m 4!41 4 Nm p0 A VSW '�` t/1 :5 s< cJ PI om i; g. g g. wl ate. E z d 4" d 0. 6, 31 �aiAsn t4 �'� 4$ 4.6 r m a r 0 1d3� dOi 33s 3N111-101VIN 09+1-6 'VIS f; ca 12' Y1HI1E STRIPE ECg 5 s a pi 2 g. a O M OL 133HS 33S 0÷6 'V1S Igitfiliii-gui 0 114 Naos. 1103111110=1111 g ,G1117: it El w O. ING GENERAL SIGNING AND DER .BAR CROSS 1 S a S 0 0.2 Z q a i o c_.1 s61 000000®00®@®@@0®® ®®o®o®o 41 .,U 00411 1 a 6 C4 A LA (51 0.0 • n 8,4 p Z m M 8 tr d ip n m r8i 8 8 0 8 8 8.i b 0 8 735 Est gt of 11 Qt SVIODJN a WC) 0 oz Ix CC a3- 1 < U -J 2 52 Lao . te Id Le W C I� ltl 1— W _ , 3 a4 rw IS f N N d �rS M n MJ`N N H q N 11 f 1 H n Wred YE 01 A i1 LA Cf) F- 6 41 g 6 APPENDIX G Intersection Level of Service Worksheets Cumulative Year 2013 Conditions Exncluding Roripaugh Ranch Project KOA Corporation November 2010 Approach Delay (s) 71.9 362.4 .4 Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Fri 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICN Religious Facility Lane Configurations IdealFlow (vphpl) - -Ism Lane UfiI. Factor el. ITA 6 f Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Fit Permitted *PONY -41 t ' ++r lin ft nI) +++ r vivi 411) 4..,::,,,„Ems, l23 233 2 , j,� e>z e ms_ t f :......5'"i „� 40.1 1 ` �'~ a 2 r`� 8 1900 1900 19£00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .,_2...rMI���(.a�.S�..�.A�,iT��NISi 'fir, f ,L, a,-": 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Fra • VAL•�'`t.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 c�r yfi< 1 0lAAI. "w2ragIP ov6 6 #w 91 J 1•v :01-Sa- =,- 0"95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 -i SSS_ 51 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 � 0.95::rr1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 :'toaitva ra .n6 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0:85 0.90 0.90 1 316 163 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 • Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated o/C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 9.9 29 4.4 $,. %Ar . e TM. .3 22.0 14.5 P33.9 20.0 22.0 0.05 0.2 1.5 0 2.0 0.14 0.09 0.23 0.13 0.14 C 52.8 14.5 � 1.5 z:q 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 20.0 50.8 0.37 0.09 0.13 4.0 1.5 1.5 0.36 4.0 VIS Ratio Prot v]c Ratio .-44 Progression Factor Delay (s) iR 0.04 0.18 0.05 0.86 0.94 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 sooigiA 70, c0.08 c0.22 c0.31 0.14 c0.34 0.91 0.97 2.47 0.96 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.21 0.33 0.75 1.69 0.93 • y, p 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 94.4 73.8 52.8 91.0 75.0 734.5 88.4 48.2 78.4 380.0 50.4 58.7 151.6 ;r474i� �'3 r fi erre - tee: r ^z HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12 AgitaiAnaliliV 4:VAL; Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 98.7% ICU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 4)31n. -16P.' _- Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) .,1111„•c,111114.'.,-; rffi��a 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes • Fit Protected Flt Permitted 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 _7tr ^v1111�N y 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 al.+.WS .c 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 i .00 6 A) Li-s's tir 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 „..t.:6 -1t SaSSigaitifattargat 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 a.95 1.00 WI 46 1.00 MI a 0.0 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (##!hr) 0.58 vow 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 10 287 253 295 185 169 0.88 0.88 630 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 25.0 39.0 -•nom 0.13 0.21 1.5 2.0 30.0 44.0 44.0 16.8 50.0 50.0 35.0 68.2 Rio 3 ai..= '. `�a 4 �„ 4in�. - . 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.19 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 0.38 4.0 iPnNif v/s Ratio Prot vlc Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) 4' 0.15 c0.28 1.19 1.36 1.00 1.00 c0.19 0.05 0.07 c0.45 1.20 0.23 0.30 0.89 1.66 r -r, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 c0.25 0.33 0.89 1.32 0.86 arf 1.00 1.00 1.00 gEi Approach Delay (s) 197.0 246.9 228.4 180.5 52.9 54.0 120.7 361.6 84.6 234.1 53.6 130.2 306.9 93.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.50 intersection Capacity Utilization 130.0%. ICU Level of Service Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 1 Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Fri 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 10.00.,f Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Auneg,i9 Fit Permitted C 4- 4\ t \o• -4/ - ' ze • -‘:Ow'''r • 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ARA* Mpt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 At' rtV• -paIiVide =':' A•Ni*A 19.1,c40014,4t.i..1'41-AN,,ek.,:li 4 U -V-,..4- ".4.0.1. . ..,,m... .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m-_,-1m.,.11440n•t=•,-:...1,,,,4V3-..-.1,MVGMvkitti351&v. :je:. a. _. t::'*g1-Vim.71,,:-.;,1'4.-.5,-.-.1.,5,.,,,Ft4-, 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 tftttg%AAMV.fr&XOXdtfitXrXX,Vf?;tt.f---,'-'EiMe,NlttfSfV,Afikit *44-WAgraVA:.-7,,SK .;.,-••,-13k,A§,;,-,-, vAva...-e.).3..44.,,I,Z.4.-1;0:'," -......,..2"-.Z.,:a....,,,,T,-•-•-::-:-'k',:."-- 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.75 1.00 -.11N Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds.p/hr) 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.53 0.53 0.53 4-45-Pria, 44-161tiV46W4,..el iv' ff. •a. 0 11 10 14 299 81 ligitcm5A4K51400, g,441tIO,OVItliOneIR*6 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G ( Actuated gIC Ratio 25.0 42.6 0.24 0.43 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 4.0 3.9 21.5 32.1 32.1 0.01 1.5 0.20 4.0 0.31 0.31 Asigat yr 2.0 2.0 32.1 32.1 0.31 d•t;4' - 47- ,ft_ROI 2.0 0.31 2.0 44,4.105,3.(c.4a3p,,,praf,„qpINITAM.'i,107,-.1014:013M-.61.AME,4-4.411.0-Tik vis Ratio Prot c0.22 0.27 iq,MaVgiff0.14q-'41-1:46„.40:x:- vt-V.; N.,s2 vlc Ratio Progression Factor ril.f504 Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) HCM Volume to Capacity rafio 0.92 0.62 1.00 1.00 0.02 c0.14 1.83 0.72 .00 1.00 58.0 21.5 576.4 38.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 32.2 0.70 str, 70.6 0.01 0.52 0.02 1.00 1.00 40"f".I.V.OP 0.11 0.21 0.35 1.00 1.00 27.3 21.9 23.4 24.7 14,•its CA% 88.9% ICU Level of Service •••171..eol.; :Y1345144 -61.194:4T 26.2 24.5 ff,f2aiistoViAweit-04-miu* 6, e KOA Corporation Synch ro - Report Page 3 c.1 Ex+Amb-'-CP-Roripaugh Fri 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations T.) Sou A.Taog_o*.v., v Sign Control Free Free Stop 0106144-;1::'1,;:-'14357:441:'001o. 1J%''•":1:4.V.StAtiftVilig,oAtagt, 0.78 0.78 0.90 0.90 0.42 0.42 4:-.6A.A.A%1,-54*-V4':'44144 Peak Hour Factor tratoAva--, " -6;4, 4-'1 • Pedestrians lat,',A12101111SIMIONMINO-i- :201SVIStr Walking Speed (Ws) Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) waasb:htla,WIA pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % krt:V •;"*P"- • +A .4.1.457 'Ag.e• Si-P'ASEAFIOr "4-•v$A2-44.4. 822 100 • s...,P•;.0,44.!Y `'361 A?1:$":Ag.§"iiWg.V44-jgfrA'Alt Volume Left cSH iat#T-OZIrk22*C414*.i., Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS Approach LOS Average Delay 1700 816 1700 0.0 Analysis Period (min) 15 tlii4ML.40/Viikiikt 1414 100 822 822 100 , • .,,,i•kr",ro- • kV • ,-.&-i-15zs lg§W.4:WW: -y. ''''14Veri•tVArx 4Fel-t-t,WRIVE<M41442-47-6iN0' ";.rn zzazo-- •, ' ,• KOA Corporation Synchro 7- Report Page 4 :1 Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Fri 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICTV Religious Facility f —1111. d Lane Configurations 1"4 7„,.,_ 4, ,,,,I,N-P4--mt.,_ Mg-A4Skg-lw., - tAtkfir"'":17-it-oV-,17 N4?;4g::-..-'q-, ' ,•'%''t-', - Volume (vph) 111 63 41 10 77 175 35 8 P, athu KheditHftrikailt. 'ga:4.4.vd,,,,,d,m,,,, eA;:-.mx-i,,,,,,..c Hourly flow rate (vph) 137 78 51 11 88 199 42 = 10 T.) 6 159 17 129 'Vrgr'w-AitM 187 20 152 Volume Total (vph) 137 128 11 286 58 187 172 J, Iiiitke;]" :.-fltVititillt,- --11Ali:1017 ,aiiVg.OMMINASilk-zi Volume Right (vph) 0 51 0 199 7 0 152 iya4irmilwifgo-N4r -,w .- _,T‘..,-,7dR.A..e ala ..i WO 007 W50 Departure Headway (s) 6.6 5.9 6.6 5.6 6.7 6.6 5.5 -v. -*4 .6 '2ileatriAila ',..;k 579 L!--.6,14-413ai Capacity (veh/h) 513 513 610 481 514 615 ,:44M,14 4.344s4grag_S-4, v741,-.e4itzliatsilo 4-ratke?tI'4.--lit--Z*NrtVi3`iegiAreiv=44 Approach Delay (s) 10.0 11.8 10.5 10.6 ANQR'J-Ft-MtS(W4$,'C'=t'kg4".:aktl.t):iVit4:-4;;t.-Wtgh!AV;.e.4fq`Nk„-;tkt'r2.krgqM"NVV.:-kVit:.44-Xt-;f.:N'V.1:A-*Z=-VV--: HCM Level of Service laff.#4feeklIV*Vt: Analysis Period min 44.41-4±44.:4Cg4-111.• 15 :341::-Arat; KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Sun 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configuration_ s Lane Ufil. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Fit Permitted J t 'yFL��glr' c +1 r ' ' ' + )1 i M.Y.Q. ,_.a�g:gn,'ita rux� )3 ;0;1::'- ` ... s `zE.... , r "MOSIV! f -n x IV. ,.. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Peak -hour factor, PHF 4X1 4144. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 10A0 1.00 Mtebt4"`L', .� �. n{+A,z_e9 i' �. �,7��.6 Y 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 $ 1.00 0.95 1.00 P v 4 A S 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 �a TK„Mnz 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.89 0.89 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 220 0 940:Mik ` ©' o Conti. Peds. (Mr) 0 319 0 0 196 0 7 4 0 11 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G ( Actuated gIC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) VAS 9.7 22.3 10.7 13.4 26.0 20.3 10.7 0.06 0.17 0.07 0.09 0.20 0.15 0.07 1.5 - 2.0 1.5 .. 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 39.0 13.4 20.3 48.6 0.32 0.09 0.15 0.40 4.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 F h `'per i,s�o ems' tr y vis Ratio Prot vlc Ratio 0.05 cO.15 0.01 c0.08 c0.11 0.10 0.06 0.17 0.01 c0.19 c0.32 0.82 0.89 0.15 0.88 0.54 0.65 anti • 0.85 0.52 0.13 1.22 0.79 ro Apa % w.e a u''o4 =7 "t: Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) L �;I 0.4 Approach Delay (s) 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 73.9 60.9 49.8 73.6 40.6 49.6 74.3 31.9 47.3 161.4 31.6 60.5 52.4 41.2 68.7 .itsry .t51 ,s+`Q HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 pp Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 79.0% ICU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 } Ex+Ambi-CP-Roripaugh Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility J Lane Configurations T, rI 4+4 . .„, 1+4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 314411"g:lb;' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -e--.4":1U-AAA%--$V,MitOt4m. - voTity,5-N m5e: Aft: 1.00 1.00 0.97. 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 MIATEMA*14;44014rg :"V'S 4.6%- rlifu 000}PlairCANAK ,kNA0i41/4;abalftliP 4:04-;z• Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Flt Permitted Etair • 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 . . AIPSE-Ar" ZfOrg:WeiMM,., LIWISWIRPENVIV6?-151a4P49.0: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 IftEmai Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) g-A-*'UNKT)fiA-I1,0% Confi. Peds. (#/hr) AV.1 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 20 124:4. e :q-iA A .5-1.434VA . 159 lAa 117 k'"" 4 ,..z.#-ZWI...)...,2041g4:-'!..0.4'.4.3•1•W.e. Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) iffilerfkr--!` 25.1 39.1 !AY, 29.4 43.4 43.4 -A • gEf5..-T:klaglrggag. .7-'1.4*40*1.-.A•trAl. "•••. `..?'z?"4'• ; . , Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.22 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 0.16 0.24 0.24 70: 2 8.0 4a2 staj 49.2 • 31.8 c,,e04-00. 1.5 • 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 =Wall, • '=q6p5=''''. 4.0 2.0 73.0 TiaDite2., 0.42 4.0 ' tt4V.1.-A vis Ratio Prot v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 .a‘4' --•`" . •A•2,4P-', 0.06 • 0.04 w:41,541.+:13r-V_E*st,0;zv.V Progression Factor Delay (s) .1•••• '44:1 t;.L,r6 11:Y=Z.ItZ4FS-., 2'.1:4z1-.1.91WAX1t74,171V-0,*4,51.•;4' n c0.16 0.01 • f4 ;i 1.03 1.03 0.03 •44:11.-W, , 401 s ..t•• 14! • 0.03 c0.24 igkef.*Ule,42, c0.17 0.30 raY5-tal, '6* Pe, 0.13 0.94 0.88 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.71 101-tite'- .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 64.1 52.2 117.0 48.6 49.8 181.7 65.1 49.1 122.1 41.5 Approach Delay (s) 55.8 98.1 66.1 55.1 t','&4,E,AX;i:AciliOr-lk,..VIT...-C411a.4-tkiktvoi,..,„(wisaitiv5givyi-il-i-Aww-2,1mtp-AitoxemA-oet HCM Volume to Capacity ratio, 0.74 glaW4,-Ft3:eltatarl tifreeiff- " Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.3% • • • •• • .."10 c Critical Lane Group ICU Level of Service AriN t•m• KOA Corporation Synch ro - Report • Page 2 Exp-Amb+CP-Roripaugh Sun 3: Nicolas Rd & General Kearny Rd ICN Religious Facility V Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor AvAIATAF 8aNgt p 1900 1900 1900 ��v3 qe:A< `b 1.00 095 -wrgiOn. 1.00 1.00 Flpb ped/bikes Ate N Fit Protected Fit Permitted 1900 '1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 i ext 4,_'�'. 8D5 , , , �$ i r ,. . ; l , 1 `i ' .0 0.95 1.00 0.68 1.00 3 0.95 1.00 Lbeer 100t 1.00 100 100 .r. d 0.95 1.00 0.76 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 �q+ 0 0 2 0 0 0.71 0.71 0.88 0.88 0.88 e`''�; 99 1444111-7.0 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated qIC Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) sP 5.5 16.2 0.05 0.29 1.5 4.0 SVA .-48*:n:Pt:ktVif*eP 141K 5 2 xa �� rs y -ry-�'E• 5.9 16.6 0=06 0.30 1.5 4.0 S 9.7 9.7 0.15 0.15 2.0 2.0 SIA 9.7 0.15 0.15 2.0 9.7 2.0 1:00011-At0 , v/s Ratio Prot Atiratikar vlc Ratio 0.06 1.02 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.10 Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 117.7 13.1 36.6 AWE 4.,0¢® c0.07 c0.14 1.04 0.47 1.00 1.00 118.0 13.6 33.6 0.00 0.28 0.00 1.00 1.00 17.7 16.7 17.7 0.01 0.10 0.09 1.00 1.00 17.0 17.0 zF 17.0 �;��^�'�'� C f i y < <., .. =�.� u.k,.,c. • J 3 a'`� �?' 'm' v"'. �' g ,,s,f krid"* ?4 r" ` : 4i �' S HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.35 44.7% ICU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Sun 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations Sign Control Free '4%a 4- 4 v Free Stop Peak Hour Factor 0.�9�7,, .0.97g-406741.44611 '`,44 0.98 0.98 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ftls) Right turn flare Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked 0.62 0.62 - nteA . �gr�T'FR'-iX 'Jf J. .� C'L A' F '.T• 3,.�.� - - vC1, s#a9 e 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol IC, 2 stage (s) 386 692 371 »r",r��:v'�s�Y.,���'°�e-s'-����':�';�3���,a. - - - •."w'�.����ea�"ac•4r��4�.�.��_�'-�_�,_ p0 queue free % Volume eft 100 99 100 4,Tlfrk;,tiaragfAVAFI;15 V441 -- 504.7 V4q,e ANie- NAP F1 -"tom' "^A� kF'} cam^ �S®1�dO',vti : +`rt' * r.aU.;..'hk. ��l S,. •F n�.e�Ga sY`��s ..t+: :F�?-'`-w'3iiY;� V10031 - cSH Queue Length 95th (ft) i3y .r. —`� ,,, G� .51.3 ��._r:;.�ii�'4'�St''�z�:;.�•x,,�r � 9.3�.� ��`.,r-�����.v'����.��'F$'!�'�.r`s ����".v �'��-a�.�'s��' ����..� Lane LOS R ‘4I13.4 -ft T610141::,X?..z21044-it 1700 1184 413 �. r.-... +. 1 �: •�`� ...a�".°r„ a tu... --. r-.,... ,.�.yS,�-aod?�'�.,�"R. ��._ �'.s.�_`��°,v�= k�a�`n�s"°�i} �`?������� Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.1 '-4044-4;41,1 ..11.-affitriitaci-itA"4:41:Kiekg,4-t-ittk Analysis Period (min) 15 41'" - 4f:S er Q KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Sun 5: La Serena Way & Walcott Ln ICTV Religious Facility Lane Configurations 33 Volume (vph) Hourly flow rate (vph) 40 Volume Total (vph) Volume Right Right (vph) y...Lacq Departure Headway (s) lt Capacity (vehlh) Approach Delay (s) 3,9 HCM Level of Service 40 ,e4V .81".„ 1 TP. 46 17 10 57 98 19 tPi •„.. - 010 56 21 14 77 132 30 21 555 8.0 628 14 209 44 169 93 AtTi, 132 9 0 86 4k- _ - 569 8.8 681 586 9.1 - 6.1 5.4 6.0 5.0 5.7 5.9 579 9.0 4.8 • 712 125 5 64 • >1,-,?..WP•Aai'41.t.' ,Itii:A.5.-ingfAMONI:1-0442414vZ ht4r rkA, Analysis Period (min) 15 44.14t1.4.41.5--elt7409.t!za,a, KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK APPENDIX H Mitigation Measures - Cumulative Year 2013 Mitigation Measures KOA Corporation November 2010 Ex +Amb +Project Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility f --fg• Lane Configurations '11 To III + r ) +44 ri 1 fil, -, r ,„„--,_w.,„,..w.t....,,-,.is,„..4..,gli,: .,,v,i,m.-..„,.-„,,vck:.yf..:,t:,,,,hit_g,-,4,,,,,,k.tis._e,tv.,,,k=,:ao,w_,..fa,w..0 ,,,.::7,,4.,,.--0 dil NAsge,Vulki4 -illgl:: gq4';:!;%rgagart*Wsia+2 V. - f'1,t0oPiNzif..zo,"50,•24.gf-114V-1.6.Vit mlmiz---4- ' °IP :,",--i-A-' ! ° -.,. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 tftitt§:fllfgr413lli9DM5r §"'''"-'-*UtnN 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 - .- -Itikv-,14A: Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes atft--.41.*441:dr '0172, Fit Protected Flt Permitted grIt;i-rf01064:1 Afilehtf: e e - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "ltialittgalatsj43SUMMOSSISIM.14,01 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 g 1'5= AV,lg);klOfaingtirr,'',_:.,Lreng4E4.ctfkOjff-oktg 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 cr4V-..outriNAAr Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 .0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 C-15ri.4,10731.1)t.0.4-ae.,?'ii:4_44$-Id,;%21,01-2tRAiiit9s, LA°141%.!,L.itg, RTOR Reduction (vph) 11 187 170 r-0.1 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 287 295 169 y,04-417-1„ 630 ,)-4-06w, .-Plo .4-1471A -41t ,,v.ctz 4441'1 Protected Phases P*,:0,04.0.0.40AitAff?Aapop*Alivz,.,0414i4i1V-Ai% Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 45.0 q.;;;;>:;18.eagi*A15:,-;;e0R,046etilkti,:oLut:4?-16-- Actuated gIC Ratio 4i41.4001,:;t: 22.5 48.0 48.0 16.2 58.0 58.0 26.5 68.3 0.10 0.25 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.14 0.38 !:,,:l'oaqqQ4:ZiWerAtkOzitfitt*.620:31-r-74t-t-WW:tigeiV24,4-adOina40,9P.-ie41," Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 l'AP(242114-MW:r -6;:t1t;%4NVOtifg4t;15A-61105PNIM'IP-RVENSTRNEOWA''.., 'Veri40 560:3'" vis Ratio Prot 0.15 ..•ivre‹.1.oi-.4 e • 2"..4r.,*1.: v/c Ratio 1.58 c0.28 1.15 c0.20 0.05 1.74 0.21 0.07 c0.45 c0.24 0.33 0.50 0.92 1.40 0.85 1.75 0.85 'Al 1th afigijA 144e:, rXVZtag 4; Progression Factor 1-21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.27 0.46 0.15 1.00 1.00 'I'zikt2,FFO-Wrilii:3WP:Z15.71.Rilkil'IY,:-A5=-F-7.1:1MOP4q?A,$:'16"7,.2-.43W-.A.,:ARS'n.Wg;e--$3 41-5- #Valf.V.-". Delay (s) 362.1 155.2 420.1 48.7 53.5 107.8 206.8 10.1 427.7 52.8 .Z:-.:"...t,'-.;;;---0,--DIVZ.V215-7-5A*1-1Z:4-'4 Approach Delay (s) 231.8 278.9 169.8 134.2 1 `1‘7-11:,--'1'elL11-4e41.14„1:iheeVte.T.11-:11,:cnIrei:efe.:;4> e1z:Peejg j5E-3',.a,:i_.E.:;:;to:ro,kk,:a-,Aqvi-1,mm-Ak-2'93--t_;*ec_-kt:o,,,ttm6.-..-- HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.52 Ylf:Millekr:Irigr:gtet7,444;NE-SX4 toP„Lir-3. Intersection Capacity Utilization i',Y.VAWSMAIN-14.AT-PS*4-0"Aeliff*alr-e44', 1 30.4% ICU Level of Service Critical Lane Group KOA Corporation Synchro 7- Report Page 2 . • • • • • • • • Ex + Amb + Project Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility • 1 Lane Configurations r ft+ T latu, -.00-paa-trAgso7v 074tpall.-66%wiNtipswyosomm4-040migi,Ali • . - • ...Avfv,^ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 YMANI-...42•40-taAttig$ 'W*12MMCIEr'"IMINifittaiging Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 $1644034446gIkkilM! V°50:471fAbiLIZIA21 P,••• Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Y.4,`42:tAt14*-57:4'"W4410*44W,c1-. VO, -1., a r e ,%tQJ 4.4-kA4' Akg _ - Fit Protected satitaest 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 MOW rittegtmonaitz.„ . • Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 • 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 • Peak -hour factor, PHF itCPANagrio, RTOR Reduction (vph) d'PakkikleXig.ziaTIVVWAN:7AINzsrott:7.-:76t4w4:w..,3.v 1.00 1.00 1.00 A1,31.74,',4•4 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 31F, -4,•• • Tr.•- • ::•rng•O le"liAT•11X-Yt.W4a..15.2F-WArArtXf-,:iliAket • •• 0 20 0 130 4.1444,Agjgi'49t Confi. Peds. (#/hr) 0.88 0.88 R.44-,AN.A1:0422A;a4P-44 123 Protected Phases *JiVOIMVigai401%."7 ;7410 f"%, V12D4E Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 8.5 39.5 32.0 63.0 63.0 Mia.'4444fig.E.-ig;9440141§,146 4zts'AttirDt-h- '4.417t;S:V4.1-7'4144., 8.0 47.4 47.4 33.1 72.5 0.03 0.21 0.17 0.35 0.35 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.18 0.41 474 • - r - • .0„) • - ill-taWabWreV4L4' '7'0" - ,-reV-- Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 -0-605ZAA7.4.0.!;"'i''-: VIWIII:feSg:nitVAMPligan? vis Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 '11,10-'6ktr'-4.31q-SZ 0.26 0.04 1.00 0.02 0.12 0.96 0.93 0.42 0.99 0.72 v/c Ratio c0.17 0.01 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 f%W"'•.: .•fg • -1;F:44-,111;14r*.11V-WP5Pahttit,04.10*, 0.03 c0.24 c0.18 0.30 „. Tg-1:4K-ritk;i414'*-F Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.74 0.37 1.00 1.00 ifq(Kike`2:4404tA-:44`,.d a*-,Zbeetkit.4-;*:--11-PV:ANW%-1--v,45-VAI--tOM' Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) 90.8 53.1 64.4 106.1 35.9 37.3 205.3 56.8 21.7 117.4 44.4 87.8 55.0 56.9 Pr. !..1•7•2: HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 D,-±1MqNr1.--100ta.exv-4' IAA :lefid*Atg"-h-M02,-k14itArt ,:ta*. Intersection Capacity Utilization 00.k606111,iite-4r -"iv- Critical Lane Group 89.5% ICU Level of Service *V.,W*4#41#4.,-..,qtia0-444-0t- •,, KOA Corporation Synch ro 7 - Report Page 2 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Protected Phases Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 1: Margarita Rd & Winchester Rd ICN Religious Facility With Project Lane Configurations f�%+TT�4 r 1' 14 ' 1' f14 j('� 1, lgp� Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 ri1900 1900 1900 1900, 19 0r 0 ° .1900 a: 1900 1900 S 1900 1900 1900 900 -11.R7 A. 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97' 0.91 :.'t416* 146 1.00 ; .9" 0 G4-40 Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Flt Permitted 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 401 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 ra k 4 k .}Seit'� . .. �,`i�� _1Plik5?•ii _ Stt.vt 414 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 4651 VZ • 34.0;)c-wo-Pil -'.yea Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Cont Peds. (#/hr) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0 138 0 257 1 0 0 76 0 0 4 v/c Ratio r.7 ps6rp�et{t r� { e 3?0� o P€`®. .-t.L 7yi,;:f qa ark' Y' s -x+i "a gta f' to ireen: � � .(.-�"F�'S����;_ ���:¢��'''�`4.-; o � �r�`'��.��rT-� kgs. „fir Ue Progression Factor Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g1C Ratio 9.5 31.0 0.04 0.1 26.6 14.5 8 36.0 41.5 26.6 65.0 14.5 41.5 79.9 6 0.14 0.07 0.19 0.23 0.14 0.36 0.07 0.23 4.7.:YWAC4t-'9r9 n i4 n :'Sire -r' ._'�" Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 1.5 0.45 1.5 4.0 vls Ratio Prot 0.05 0.18 0.07 0.08 c0.22 c0.36 1.28 1.11 0.14 c0.41 c0.09 0.22 0.38 0.49 1.15 1.15 1.60 0.98 1.13 1.30 0.96 0.84 Delay (s) • Approach Delay (s) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.47 `r�"` r �,��,,��x�-.��,��a�?� ..,�,c '`��,,✓ sf m�,'����-���...i"�-�a� 251.5 143.4 68.3 184.9 150.7 347.8 107.9 118.3 265.4 �.�y_.t kir3rt�Y gm 71.3 21.7 143.3 242.1 127.9 35.6 Z C T� H P.-3 t .,;�5��s.•.a.< �� sem:: �s��.��3 �r`aaFr-" �.-,s'' HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 1.31 ,.�d�l ( f C "�- c+ t Ic'y}fir P�`'�-r`a �' x3 a r t:..•4c� n,.v-�,(� - '�..ka 105.5% ICU Level of Service VliKa 4 r�: 'as`. w KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility With Project t pL�ane Configurations + + T� vim +ps �{�" 'VI - rjT 'i tilt '1� b` :- ;I: -�i, `� i�.� a7 T`3Sn `'a iii 5 '6 x 13 �7Y .,`x-�' Y 5 w.,,4 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 irSakr cap 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 1.00 Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane UtiI. Factor fnc E ails r1 _,:K €Mi20 o mea ' : :gb bfat:0 V. , .'R < . Flpb, ped/bikes Flt Protected Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 6. 9a; 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 111 _ p 1.00 b6Y. }.e+„�V.°yr' S �E' E 4F. 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 72 287 0 169 295 287 0 1 69 34 630 r ...,VT -i. i st as, a.e n.Jo 411,*; ram Protected. Phases Actuated Green, G (s) ..;igetfikt-t414,17.tiyie.40 ',Ha! 28.5 39.0 39.0 28.5 39.0 39.0 10.5 62.0 62.0 22.5 74.0 74.0 si SmotY%�;r�K '� Actuated g/C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.04 0.35 0.35 5 � a• x^s W i We su r3 � a'{ 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.1 1 0.42 0.42 4;47;4 44,:triVit-- 2.0 4.0 4.0 vis Ratio Prot via Ratio Progression Factor .... �.4 �. t.<1E� �F, .--�.z-,. �. _��3-�c.`. "� �� r.�-r. �ta�� `.s'�-.-�.'.ea �,k. �,`�.z?��,., ����a:ur :;:'+o s, ,• ;����t;- .?.;a�`-*,`K?aaa�r %. 0.15 0.17 1 c0.18 0.05 .02 0.79 0.35 1.19 0.26 0.83 ra 0.04 c0.38 0.83 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.24 0.51 c0.14 0.24 lizaaAl6e;gilt, 0.86 1.19 0.57 0.22 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay (s) 131.7 77.7 61.2 172.1 56.0 85.1 103.6 76.1 9.9 182.6 38.7 313 Approach Delay (s) 94.3 140.5 y NCM Volume to Capacity rafio WeifICAJIVAZWAII Intersection Capacity Utilization Critical Lane Group 1.06 111.8% 62.4 70.6 ICU Level of Service tgarg o KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 yd -Y -s i. 7 t 0 22 136 Ex+Amb+CP+Roripaugh Fri 4: Nicolas Rd & Calle Colibri ICN Religious Facility With Project Mitigation Lane Configurations Sign Control Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians Walking Speed Otis) Right tum Hare (veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked g-.1.400110113 94 vC1, stage 1 confvol vCu, unblocked vol tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free • Free '}6 Stop 0.78 0.78 0.90 0.90 0.42 0.42 wsoMictIN 2 WOO, 1251 96 1213 -40 n"+ Pic 2068 1213 5.4 41 %"se 41:5404 80 tittAIEz t tp i� , fit Fid ��:...�..Z Z` _'F:}`�4Na lr Volume Left foAtip cSH Queue Length 95th (ft) Lane LOS Approach LOS Average Delay Analysis Period 1700 563 Astotto 230 143 F 5.3 15 211 KOA Corporation Synchro 7- Report Page 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Fri 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility With Project Lane Configurations Vate Ideal Flow (vphpl) ,40 Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes Fit Protected 30:€3 Fit Permitted t 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.97 1.00 1.00 +J r 44 '247z0444.40121 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 y° { x ,,�-T} - 0.95 1 00 100 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 me's 1.00 1.00 4, olt 01„-A-, , 5msi,-ttxze �tatu 00`Te.., 1:71<4. Peak -hour factor, PHF .,}.: 1j, x` 6 jf � °` " r 9 Q.i 0 G '-0' i..`r�a� .T '`. C 't '� 1"c' RTOR Reduction (vph) 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 0 11 0 0 0 187 0 0 175 0 5 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 287 295 169 630 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Vehicle Extension (s) 19.5 45.0 0.10 0.25 1.5 2.0 ,40 23.5 49.0 49.0 16.2 57.0 57.0 26.5 67.3 , z.0 oi,4x e- t144,5g 'e ''@ ` k a t , .. 0.12 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.14 0.38. 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 F d., -h .1 vis Ratio Prot vic Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) •G Approach. Delay (s) 0.15 x0.28 1.58 1.15 1.00 1.00 362.1 155.2 231.8 x0.21 0.05 0.07 x0.45 x0.25 0.33 1.71 0.20 0.55 0.92 1.43 0.94 1.84 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.49 0.18 1.00 1.00 404.6 47.9 54.2 108.0 220.1 15.7 466.4 54.3 268.8 179.5 147.2 rAP- _..: ..,..., HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 1.55 132.0% ICU Level of Service KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 lirTodetoki471:- Ex+Amb+CP-Roripaugh Sun 2: Nicolas Rd & Winchester Rd ICTV Religious Facility With Project Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Flpb, ped/bikes ps .41 'F FIt Protected,,. Fit Permitted 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 T:411 PIE 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 � 502 4000 x '�.. 0 6 0.95 1 AD 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 t p t 4/ e a l 1 3Q y j2 i 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Gi'!s3 1.00 5b...s. .00 0.95 1.00 .00 0.95 1.00 1.0 Peak -hour factor, PHF RTOR Reduction (vph) Conti. Peds. (#/hr) Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Actuated gIC Ratio taiinfiainrv Vehicle Extension (s) 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 20 8.5 39.0 0.03 0.21 1.5 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 33.5 64.0 64.0 146 0.18 0.36 1.5 2.0 8.0 e g 45.3 130 Vi -Age! 45.3 34.2 71.5 0.36 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.40 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 fx'ikt v/s Ratio Prot RAlt vlc Ratio Progression Factor Delay (s) 0.01 0.01 0.26 0.04 .00 1.00 90.8. 53.5 ezb c0.18 0.01 0.03 c0.24 'xY4 fdB; 1.00 0.02 0.14 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 t26 0.74 c0.18 0.30 0.46 0.99 0.38 1.00 0.73 1.00 104.5 35.2 36.8 204.4 65.9 23.7 116.1 45.4 • R. .<.>c>gitifugeri:.1-eR443).1.4.644b*A..<t0r -� .,':�€-r Aa-;vf -VA EINR.:a .. y Approach Delay (s) 64.7 85.7 62.1 57.8 ° [ � I L-si r �` i�;, R �.� ��.. ��� exp � � '''-�' � § ^s.. ,� �.�?,��T�.--� 'E������ �.'�•� ai �� +.t' .,,, h�,A�.�s� ;�fc„ UCw � n-�}o i �I bw �a�. �o�.r �•,�T� � �G '�i� �' � � ��`=� e� �� � p '�"�°'tu� ;;a€,. ��.. .� � ��-"3 �..._,� � � f�.�,�,,�,,'y+ �s.� .. RCM Volume to Capacity ratio Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.73 90.1% Critical Lane Group ICU Level of Service 444M`e : OP - KOA Corporation Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 Patrick Richardson From: John Steinmetz[johnsteinmetz@globalrecordings.net] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:08 AM To: Patrick Richardson Subject: Mosque Dear Sir, I just spoke with you and wanted to offer my support to Imam Mahmoud Harmoush and those who wish to build a mosque here in Temecula. Please stay here and enjoy our community and help us to be a better community! John Steinmetz 1 October 11, 2010 City of Temecula Planning Commission, My name is Brian Bell. 1 am the pastor of Calvary Murrieta. My wife and land two adult children have been residents in Temecula since March of 1985,.and we love our city. 1 am writing you regarding the building of a Mosque in our city. I would first point out I am not writing in regards to the Mosques building codes, noise ordinance, etc. as I know they will obviously need to comply, as would any new development. I am simply writing in regards to the recent "bad press" that the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley (ICTV) has received. I have called the center's Imam, Mahmoud Harmoush, to share my endorsement of a permanent house of worship for them. My reasoning is because our country was built on Freedom of Religion, all religions, not just the one I hold to. I believe there has been some in our community who assume all Muslims are extremists...which is as foolish as all Christians believe in blowing up abortion clinics. I have traveled to many Muslim countries and have enjoyed sharing my faith with them and hearing of their faith as we reasoned together. I know many beautiful Muslim families who are all about providing for and loving their family, community, and loving their country where they reside. Last I checked our Statue of Liberty still reads: "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to, I lift my lamp beside the golden door.!" I hope the planning commission will make their decision based on the building, the area, the codes, but not in any way hold prejudice against a people group, nor a religious group. I will be praying for your decision. I appreciate all your hard work for our city. Thanks for listening, Pastor Brian Bell Calvary Murrieta 24225 Monroe Ave. • Murrieta, Ca. 92562 • Phone 951.677.5667 • Fax 951.698.4896 City of Temecula Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Planning Commission Members: 27601 Sun City Blvd., #270 Sun City, CA 92586 August 20, 2010 This letter is in response to certain actions reported in the Riverside Press - Enterprise in regards to Commission consideration of a mosque in Temecula. [ am in favor of allowing the plans for a mosque to move forward. I am not a Muslim, but instead a practicing Christian. I am not a resident of Temecula, although I live nearby. I strongly support our U.S. Constitution's protection of freedom of religion and freedom of speech. This means that I must condone the tea party or individuals when they express their fear of local Muslims. I think it is a great disservice to label these law-abiding, peaceful Muslims as terrorists. I do not believe they are war -mongering fanatics, but rather responsible individuals who contribute in positive ways to this country. The hallmark of our country is that we allow all faiths and beliefs to be practiced and that we, as a country, tend to give people the benefit of the doubt until they prove differently. The best way to turn U.S. Muslims into terrorists would be to take away their rights, label them as subversives, and treat them as "the enemy within." I was heartened to see such a large turnout in July in support of the mosque. I hope the Planning .Commission will move forward to grant a permit for the mosque to be built. This will, hopefully, counteract Temecula being presented as a city of bigoted, insensitive individuals who do not hold the U.S. Constitution in high regard. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions or comments, you may contact me at my address above or call me at 951-679-3838. Respectfully, ()c_ Ada J. Hand cc: Council on Islamic -American Relations Eric Jones From: Patrick Richardson Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 7:46 AM To: Eric Jones Subject: FW: COPY: Citizen Web Contact: General Feedback/Requests » General Feedback (Supervisor Version) FYI and for the file. From: Grant Yates Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 7:32 AM To: Patrick Richardson; Bob Johnson Subject: FW: COPY: Citizen Web Contact: General Feedback/Requests » General Feedback (Supervisor Version) From: City Website Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 5:03 PM To: Grant Yates Subject: COPY: Citizen Web Contact: General Feedback/Requests » General Feedback (Supervisor Version) This' copy is,sent to ;you becauseyou are the Director/Supervisor contact for'this topic. If the prinaryper-son (Sue.Steffen(c cityo;€tern$ecula.org) is absent, pleascTfollo.,w`uprw th the:'crt�zen. A Contact Us Web Form has been submitted to: General Feedback/Requests » General Feedback First Name: Cindy Last Name: Beech Email Address: cstu112004@yahoo.com Type of Request: Problem Description: Courage!! !Please take a stand in your City for freedom of religion and ALLOW THE BUILDING OF THE MOSQUE. I know that non -citizens of Temecula protested the building of a mosque. I live in Hemet and do shop in Temecula so I feel that I can at least voice my opinion regardingthis subject. i Rev. Dr. Gwynn* Guibord Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles Jihad Turk Islamic Canter of Southern California Parldetpating Organizations Bishop Steve Gilliland Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints Sherrci A. Johnson Council on American -Islamic Relations Greater Los Angeles Area Rev. Ginny Wegener Southwest California Synod Evangelical Lutheran Cfwrch in America Dr. Grace Dyrnass institute for Urban Research and Development Dr. Maher Hathout Islamic Center of Southern California Shakers' Syed Islamic Shura Council of Southern Ceiifomie Dr. Musammif Siddigi Islamic Society of Orange County Salam AI-Marayati, Adze Hasan, and Edina Lckovic JMusJim Public Affairs Council Defer a Dekhii Omar Ibn AlIEhattab Foundation Dr. Lisa Patriquin Synod of Southam California and Hawaii, Presbyterian Church (USA) Virginia C'assick Progressive Christians Uniting Rt. Rcpt Alexei Smith Roman Catholic Archdiocese Sufi John Ishvaradas Abdallah South Coast Interfaith Council Acv. Dr. Paul Lance Southern California Ecumenical Council Rev. Jerry Stinson Southern California -Nevada Conference United Church of Christ Mary Marjorie 13cthoa St. John's Cathedral Rev. tfark Nakagawa United Methodist. Church The Christian -Muslim Consultative Group 137 N. Larchimont Blvd. Suite 689 Los Angeles CA 90004 323-309-4061 www.thecmcg org Carl R. Carey Chairman Temecula Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Dr Temecula, California 92589 Dear Commissioner Carey, 16 August 2010 On behalf of the Christian representation of The Christian - Muslim Consultative Group we stand in full support of our Muslim brothers and sisters building a mosque in Temecula. As our Muslim neighbors have begun their observance of Ramadan with fasting, re- dedicating themselves to God and God's service, we as Christians are troubled by fellow Christians who are expressing intolerance against Muslims in words and actions. We are reminded that The United States Constitution guarantees that there will not be an established religion in our nation and that all citizens will be free to exercise their religion. The guarantees in our constitution allow various expressions of religion to flourish; our country's diverse religious heritage is our greatest asset. It is our fervent prayer that the Temecula Planning Commission will say 'no' to the non- inclusive rhetoric of hatred and 'yes' to promoting respect and love of neighbor, in order that as a community of faithful people all may live out the commandment to love our neighbor and to promote peace. Faithfully yours, The Feverer :-.anon Dr. Gwynne Guibord Co-founder and Co-chair Temecula Planning Commission Temecula City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589 Re: Temecula Valley Islamic Center Though not a resident of your community, I am writing to ask that you give fully impartial consideration to the proposal to establish the Center when it comes before you. I of course cannot say whether it complies with the various land use requirements under which you must evaluate such submissions. But as an American citizen who believes deeply in our long tradition of religious freedom I ask that you give it the same treatment that you would give that of any group seeking to establish such a facility. I have read accounts in the news of demonstrations both for and against the planned mosque. I believe that those who are attacking the proposal have confused a relatively small number of terrorists and criminals who hide behind Islam with a peaceful & productive community that is very much an asset and yet another valuable different perspective in our diverse and pluralistic country. Nick ` cNaughton PO Box 27612 Los Angeles, Calif. 90027 nickfmcn@yahoo.com 37670 Early Lane Murrieta, CA, 92563 July 26, 2010 To Chairman Carl R. Carey and the Temecula City Planning Comm Gentlemen: My name is Merle Lehman and I am writing to support granting permission to the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley to build a worship and community center on Nicolas Road. I am a member of the Murrieta -Temecula Interfaith Council and have known Imam Mahmoud Harmoush and other members of his congregation for five years. I am a retired United Methodist pastor, campus minister and college teacher and have known Muslims, both academically and personally, for over 40 years. Before the first mosque was built in San Diego, the Islamic Society of San Diego met for Friday services in the social hall of the Wesley United Methodist Church when I was the pastor. I made many Muslim friends and we had Christian -Muslim dialogues at our church. Most of the San Diego Muslims were professional people: doctors, lawyers, engineers, architects, teachers, business people, etc. This is typical of American Muslims and is also true of the members of our Temecula mosque. The Islamic Society of San Diego met at the Wesley United Methodist Church until they built on land sold to them by a Lutheran Church. This was in a residential neighborhood next to the Lutheran Church. Now they have a beautiful mosque, a school and a shop which sells Middle Eastern food and other items. I` realize that the Planning Commission's task is not to pass judgment on the character or the religion of groups asking permission to build. However, those who oppose building a mosque in Temecula will use criteria like increased traffic congestion and noise levels to mask the true motivation for their opposition which is religious discrimination based on fear and ignorance. How do I know this? When an article was published in the Riverside Press - Enterprise earlier this month which quoted me as supporting building the mosque, a woman phoned me to scold me. She told me that I should not support it because all Muslims are extremists who want to conquer the world. She said they are devious and only pretend to be tolerant of others. The mosque should not be built, she said, because Islam is not a religion, it is "a business and an ideology." I think the most appropriate description of this woman's remarks is "slander:" "The utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation." I have seen the proposed building site. It is not in a residential neighborhood and there is plenty of room for the Islamic Center as well as the two churches which will be its neighbors. My view of Muslims is not just personal; it also reflects the teaching of The United Methodist Church. The church's statement on "Our Muslim Neighbors" includes: "We urge United Methodists to promote understanding between Christians and Muslims in local communities through:... ---upholding the dignity of individuals, families, and communities, and --seeking to remedy situations in which Muslims encounter misunderstandings, 2 prejudice, stereotyping, or even hostility from the neighborhood or population when they desire to express their faith in everyday life." Hostility toward Muslims in Temecula has received national attention. I am sure the Planning Commission will not want to promote the perception that our community is ruled by fear and ignorance by denying permission to build the mosque. Sincerely, td/t/cet Rev. Merle Lehman Note: Duplicate informational packets were sent to all five Planning C . Fssioners PLANNING COMMISSION A very important decision will be made soon that can affect the lives of the people of Temecula and surrounding communities. Enclosed are articles for your review that give a look at how things may change for this area. We live side-by-side with many religions but none want to change our way of life or infringe on the United States Constitution. It is my hope that Temecula and other areas will remain as safe and enjoyable as i ey are, which is the reason we moved here. Sincerely, KenFaz 37 ► Galil Murrieta, CA. 92563 fG'iL�v� August 19, 2006 The Real Teachings of the Koran By Cal Thomas During the Cold War, American intelligence loved getting its hands on defectors from communism. The reasoning was that these people had the best information about the plans of the other side, information that would help America defeat thern. In the present war against what President Bush has properly labeled "Islamic fascism," defectors are just as valuable. The Israel Project, an international nonprofit organization devoted to educating the press and the public about Israel, recently made a former leading imam and radical Islam expert available for media interviews and I had a chance to speak with him. He goes by the name of Sam Soloman because of death threats from those not happy with the information he has about their plans to dominate the world. Soloman was brought up in the Islamic tradition and became a "recruiter," which he says is something like an assistant teacher. One of his responsibilities was "brainwashing people in the Koran." He tells me "The suicide bombers go throu h stages, and the most important stage is not when they low themse ves up. The most important stage is conforming them to the (Muslim) ideology. Once they are conformed to the ideology, tiexrest rs `easy. a s e ro e I had." Soloman is in double trouble. Not only did he abandon Islam and the terrorists' objectives, he has also become a Christian, which has marked him for death. Born in the Middle East, he visited Washington from his adopted country, which he declines to name to protect his family. Soloman speaks with knowledge, credibility and conviction. He has memorized large sections of the Koran and tells me, "There's nota single verse in the Koran talkin about peace with a non- uslim, with the Jews and the Christians. Islam means submission. Islam means surrender. It means you surrender and accept Islamic hegemony over yourselves..." What is a Mosque? An Interview with Sam Solomon by Jerry Gordon (August 2010) Gordon: Greetings Mr. Solomon and thank you for consenting to this interview. Let us start with the simple question, what is a mosque and what is its basic function in the Muslim community? Solomon: A mosque, totally unlike a church or a synagogue, serves the function of orchestrating and mandating every aspect of "life" in a Muslim community from the religious, to the political, to the economic, to the social, to the military. In Islam, religion and life are not separate. They are indivisible. In Islam religion is not just a part of life, but "life" is absorbed and regulated to the tiniest detail by religion (See Figure 1). In other words every aspect of a man or woman's life must be defined and governed by religion. So there is no concept of personal choice whatsoever, or in theological terms, there is no "free will," but only limited preferences between prescribed courses of action. In addition, there is no concept of a personal relationship between the person and the entity being worshiped, so "worship" itself, is of a different nature than that performed in a church or synagogue. c Figure 1: Comparison of Non -Islamic vs Islamic views of one's freedom of choice and options in life. So we see that a mos ue is a seat of government. A mosque is a school. A mosque is a cou . A mosque is a training center. A mosque is a gathering place, or social center. It is not a place of "worship" per se as understood and as prac ice in Western societies, Specifically, how is a mosque a threat to the community within which it is built? Every single mosque in the world, by definition, is modeled on the mosque of Muhammad in Medina in accordance with the Sunnah. The Sunnah interprets the Qur'an by reporting exhaustively on everything that Muhammad said, did, or consented to. Therefore, his Medina mosque, ,the first mosque was a place where he gave judgments, where he decided who would be executed, where he instituted policy— domestic and military-- where Jihad war strategies were designed. Consequently, it was a storage place for arms, a military training base, and was where troops were blessed and dispatched. Literally they were sent to conquer - first the whole of Arabia, and then the rest of the known world. Therefore if the present-day mosque is modeled as per the Sunnah of Muhammad then there should be very serious concern. As is well-known, Muslims are required to ollow the example (Sunnah) of Muhammad—and according to Sura 33:36 it is not an option or a matter of opinion: "It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error." This explains and establishes beyond doubt why arms have been found in mosques in various countries, and in different Capital cities. In addition to the undisputed significance of the Medina mosque as the role model for all Mosques, there is also the Islamic policy of establishing strateis Mos ues as eachheads with interconnected networks. Taken together, ese two policies do constitute a clear and present danger— and a need for concern. For example, when Abu Hamza[ i.] was the Imam of the Finsbury Park mosque in the United Kingdom, he trained (..., people, he sent out terrorists and British authorities found arms stored there. He was well within his Islamic mandate as these activities were sanctioned b Islam. a didn't find it . wrong because it is in the Islamic manuals. Another prime example of a mosque being found to have engaged in high- level political, military and intelligence activities is the Munich Mosque, which is now considered by Islamists to be on a par with some of highest -ranked Mosques in Muslim countries.[2 ] What comment do you have on the significance of the Ground Zero Mosque set to open on 9/111 2011? First of all, the sponsors and supporters of the Ground Zero Mosque insist that the significance of the building of this mosque is that it constitutes a refutation of the radical "fringe" within Islam, and as such, is a gesture of peace and reconciliation toward America and the victims of 9/11. But, it is ludicrous for anybody to accept that this is a gesture o f peace in t e es ern sense—rather it is a different definition of "peace." It is the Islamic definition of "peace" as a suspension of "struggle" which is ultimately said to emerge once opposition ceases,, and Islam reigns supreme as Muhammad has stated, "Islam rises and nothing rises above it." The rationale of the sponsors is that acts of terrorism are being carried out by misguided "radicals" rather than true Muslims and that as a consequence, Islam itself has been victimized and defamed and needs to be defended. Their solution is to appear to decry all "radicalism", and to take the bold symbolic act of erecting a 13 to 15 -story Mosque— ostensibly representing true Islam—on the site itself, in their words, to "bridge and heal this divide." w ] So, if allowed to be built, this mosque would consolidate, solidify, and embody a fallacious and pernicious interpretation of what really happened at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.[4] In one fell swoop, it will be a re -writing of American history with American cooperation, and will achieve another major Islamic goal of setting a high profile beachhead at a strategic location in the seat of American economic power. When you speak of setting a "beachhead," is building this mosque tactically similar to Muslims building the Al Aqsa Mosque adjacent to the Western Wa in erusa em _ Most Westerners do not realize that there are two Mos ues on the Temple Mount. One is called Masjid Al-Agsa, the Mosque of Ascension, and the other is called "Qubbat Al- Sakhra"f the Dome of the Rock. To provide the groundwork for answering your question more specifically, the basic principle is, that a mosque, totally unlike a church or synagogue, is a "sign" and a "symbol" of the establishment of "authority"—both religious and political—not just a place of worship o lts adherents. A mosque is the symbol of the establishment of an Islamic authority, and an announcement of the beginning of the "ri htful restoration" of the land according to Islamic claims that the "whole world is a mosque," and is echoed in Muhammad's words, "the whole earth has been declared unto me a mosque." Therefore it is a matter of "restoring" rather than "claiming" the land to Islam, as an land not in current submission is at virtual war with sl wand mus •e brought "back" according to the Qur'anic version of history. This process of "bringing back" has a name, it is called "Islamisation," and is implemented progressively though immrgratin• se•reuating, •a€ning rig s, an s owly asse in• the supremacy of Is am po i iT c� ally, socially and even culturally. So, yes, e roun• ero Mosque wou • •e a beachhead—and an important one, but it is not exactly the same as in the case of the Al Aqsa Mosque. The building of the Al Aqsa Mosque adjacent to the Western Wall was a necessary consolidation of prior Qur'anic claims to the Holy Land and the spiritual base of Judeo-Christian Monotheism,[51 whereas the building of the Ground Zero Mosque would be more in line with the tactical aspect of spreading the base. (See footnote 3) Having said that, some "beachhead" mosques are more strategic than others. As we have seen earlier the Munich Mosque became the most influential of those built outside Muslim lands prior to the proposed Ground Zero Mosque. (If built, the Ground Zero Mosque will be the most influential sign and symbol of Islamic authority in the Western World., C Can you explain the significance of the `Hijra' or migration? You need to understand an important distinction: In Islam migration is a mental concept as well as a physical action. To answer your question about the significance of the Hijra itself, it was the physical migration of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib [Medina] in 622 AD, making it the most important event in Islamic history and the reason for starting the Islamic calendar—while at the same time instituting it as the model for future expansion by immigration. [6] However, the concept of migration in its broader sense is highly significant. Conceptually, mental migration can be from one mode of operation to another, in other words from a non -Islamic mode to an Islamic mode. The non -Islamic mode is known as Al-Jahiliyyah meaning "the age of ignorance," which has nothing to do with the Western concept of ignorance. So Al-Jahiliyyah, is a broad title given to all sorts of practices which might be regarded as un -Islamic. For example a woman who used to dress in Western-style, (considered as Jahiliyyah practice), her "migration" toward Islamic practice would be that she now adorns herself with the Hijab (head scarf) or total Nikab (full face and body cover). This movement from Western dress to Islamic veil would constitute a migration in dress code and behaviour. Examples of other conceptual migrations would be im osin Islamic values and systems within host countries, such as Sharjah -complaint finance. It is all to achieve one purpose, the Islamisation first of the Muslim community by bringing it more and more in line with Islamic principles and, second to condition and transform the host society. The foregoing was an explanation of a conceptual,spiritual, or mental transformation. • The physical migration of Muslim communities, from one country to another or from one area to another is just as important. It is to extend the rule of Islam. For instance, there would be no need for s auric schools if there were no Muslim children. There would be no need for Halal meat if there were no Muslim consumers. There would be no debate about the Hijab if there were no Muslim women to wear it. Therefore, any such demand by the Muslim community within a host country is an expression of their desire to be governed by Islam. Demanding Islamic banking is a direct imposition of the S ariah Law on non Muslims, even if there may not be any Muslims in the community. Why does Islam celebrate Mohammad's journey from Mecca to Yathrib (Medina) annually rather than his birthday? The celebration of Muhammad's birthday is controversial within the community of Islamic scholars, as it is considered as an innovation (a "Bid'a")—though practically, it is recognized as a holiday in most Muslim countries. However, your point is well taken. All Muslims do celebrate the Islamic New Year, based on the Islamic Calendar—which after deliberations regarding other dates in Muhammad's life, was dated from the Hijra, his journey from Mecca to Medina, rather than from his birthday. The Islamic calendar was established by Umar bin Ai- Khattab, the second Khalifah in response to letters of concern from the various judges and governors in the new Islamic empire saying to him, your letters are undated. Thus he was confronted with a dilemma, as any dating system at that time was un -Islamic. So he called a committee to look into it and they initially decided not to start the Islamic calendar with the birth of Mohammed, and then considered various other important events that occurred in Muhammad's life as the starting point of the new calendar. However. Umar concluded that it would be appropriate to start the calendar from the day of Muhammad's flight or Hijra, because from that day forward he was transformed from a haunted man to a victorious ruler. Thus the Islamic calendar, called the "Anno Hijrah Calendar," or "Immigration Calendar," abbreviated as "A. H." replaced all existing calendars and was established as a declaration of the victory of Islam over the rest of the World. What is the most important thing for us to know about Islam? The most important thing for a non -Muslim to understand about Islam is that Islam is not simply a religion. Islam is a social and political system, an indivisible melding of religion and state. It is a socio-political, socio -religious, socio -economical, socio -educational, socio -judiciary, legislative militaristic system cloaked and garbed in religious terminology. We must never forget that Islam is an all-encompassing ideological system and as such wherever there is a Muslim • community there will be $haria_and wherever there is a -- Sharia there is an Islamisation of the territory and ultimately -.._ of the nation. Why Sharjah? By Noah Feldman, Adjunct Senior Fellow March 23, 2009 1 .introduction 2. What is Sharia? 3.Controversy: Punishment and Equality under Sharia 4.Sharia vs. Secularism S.Modern Economies and Sharia Introduction Sharia, or Islamic law, influences the legal code in most Muslim countries. A movement to allow sharia to govern personal status law, a set of regulations that pertain to marriage, divorce, inheritance, and custody, is even expanding into the West. "There are so many varying interpretations of what sharia actually means that in some places it can be incorporated into 7 political systems:relatively easily," says Steven A. Cook, CFR senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies. Sharia s influ�erce on bothsonal status law and criminal law is highly controver though. Some interpretations are used to justify crue punishments such as amputation and stoning as well as unequal treatment of women in inheritance, dress, and independence. 'The debate is growing as to whether sharia can coexist with secularism, democracy, or even modernity. What is Sharia? Also meaning "path" in Arabic, sharia guides all aspects of Muslim life including daily routines, familia an re igzous o h�ations and financial zags. It is derived primarily from the Quran and the Sunna--the sayings, practices, and teachings of the Prophet Mohammed. Precedents and analogy applied by Muslim scholars are used to address new issues. The consensus of the Muslim community also plays a role in defining this theological manual. Sharia developed several hundred years after the Prophet Mohammed's death in 632 CE as the Islamic empire expanded to the edge of North Africa in the West and to China in the East. Since the Prophet Mohammed was considered the most pious of all believers, his life and ways became a model for all other Muslims and were collected by scholars into what is known as the hadith. As each locality tried to reconcile local customs and Islam, hadith literature grew and developed into distinct schools of Islamic thought: the Sunni schools, Hanbali, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanafi; and the Shiite school, Ja'fari. Named after the scholars that inspired them, they differ in the weight each applies to the sources from which sharia is derived, the Quran, hadith, Islamic scholars, and consensus of the community. The Hanbali school, known for following the most Orthodox form of Islam, is embraced in Saudi Arabia and by the Taliban. The Hanafi school, known for being the most liberal and the most focused on reason and analogy, is dominant among Sunnis in Central Asia, Egypt, Pakistan, India, China, Turkey, the Balkans, and the Caucasus. The Maliki school is dominant in North Africa and the Shafi'i school in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Yemen. Shia Muslims follow the Ja'fari school, most notably in Shia -dominant Iran. The distinctions have more impact on the legal systems in each country, however, than on individual Muslims, as many do not adhere to one school in their personal lives. Controversy: Punishment and Equality under Sharia Marriage and divorce are the most significant aspects of sharia, but criminal law is the most controversial. In sharia, there are categories of offenses: those that are prescribed a specific punishment in the Quran, known as hadd punishments, those that fall under a judge's discretion, and those resolved through a tit-for-tat measure (ie., blood money paid to the family of a murder victim). There are five hadd crimes: unlawful sexual intercourse (sex outside of marriage and adultery), false accusation of unlawful sexual intercourse, ..--X---wine drinking sometimes extended to include all alcohol drinking), theft, and highway robbery. Punishments or has I o fenses--flogging, stoning, amputation, exile, or execution --get a significant amount of media attention when they occur. These sentences are not often prescribed, however. "In -� reality, most Muslim countries do not use traditional classical Islamic punishments," says Ali Mazrui of the Institute of Global Cultural Studies in. a Voice of America interview. These punishments remain on the books in some countries but lesser penalties are often considered sufficient. Despite official reluctance to use hadd punishments, vigilante justice still takes place. Honor killings, murders committed in retaliation for bringing dishonor on one's family, are a worldwide problem. While precise statistics are scarce, the UN estimates thousands of women are killed annually in the name of family honor (National Geographic). Other practices that are woven into the sharia debate, such as female genital mutilation, adolescent marriages, polygamy, and gender -biased inheritance rules, elicit as much controversy. There is significant debate over what the Quran sanctions and what practices were pulled from local customs and predate Islam. ose that seek to eliminate or at least modify these controversial practices cite the religious tenet of tajdid. The concept is one of renewal, where Islamic society must be reformed constantly to keep it in its purest form. "With the passage of time and changing circumstances since traditional classical jurisprudence was founded, people's problems have changed and conversely, there must be new thought to address these changes and events," says Dr. Abdul Fatah Idris, head of the comparative jurisprudence department at Al- Azhar University in Cairo. Though many scholars share this line of thought, there are those who consider the purest form of Islam to be the one practiced in the seventh century. ,Sharia vs. Secularism In a 2007 University of Maryland poll (PDF), more than 60 percent of the populations in Egypt, Morocco, Pakistan, and Indonesia responded that democracy was a good way to govern their respective countries, while at the same time, an average of 71 percent agreed with requiring "strict application of [sharia] law in every Islamic country." Whether democracy and Islam can coexist is a topic of heated debate. Some Islamists argue democracy is a purely Western concept imposed on Muslim countries. Others feel Islam necessitates a democratic system and that democracy has a basis in the Quran since "mutual consultation" among the people is commended (42:38 Quran). John L. Esposito and John O. Voll explain the debate in a 2001 article in the journal Humanities. Noah Feldman, CFR adjunct senior fellow, writes in a 2008 New York Times Magazine article that the full incorporation of Islamic law is viewed as creating "a path to just and legitimate government in much of the Muslim world." It places duplicitous rulers alongside their constituents under the rule of God. "For many Muslims today, living in corrupt autocracies the call for [sharia] is not a call for sexism, obscurantism or savage punishment but for an Islamic version of what the West considers its most prized principle of political justice: the rule of law," Feldman argues. On the other hand, some Muslim scholars say that secular government is the best way to observe sharia. "Enforcing a [sharia] through coercive power of the state negates its religious nature, because Muslims would be observin the law of the state and not freel s erformin their reli g ious obligation as Muslims," says • • dullahi Ahmed An-Na'im, a professor o acv at Emory University and author of a book on the future of sharia. Opinions on the best balance of Islamic law and secular law vary, but sharia has been incorporated into political systems in three general ways: •Dual Legal System. Many majority Muslim countries have a dual system in which the government is secular but Muslims can choose to bring familial and financial disputes to sharia courts. The exact jurisdiction of these courts varies from country to country, but usually includes marriage, divorce, inheritance, and guardianship. Examples can be seen in Nigeria and Kenya, which have sharia courts that rule on family law for Muslims. A variation exists in Tanzania, where civil courts apply sharia or secular law according to the religious backgrounds of the defendants. Several countries, including Lebanon and Indonesia, have mixed jurisdiction courts based on residual colonial legal systems and supplemented with sharia. Ahmad Nizar Hamzeh of the American University of Beirut says only Qatar has an official dual legal system where Adlia courts, or civil courts, are independent of the sharia system and legislate secular laws. Western countries are also exploring the idea of allowing Muslims to apply Islamic law in familial and financial disputes. In late 2008, Britain officially allowed sharia tribunals (NYT) governing marriage, divorce, and inheritance to make legally binding decisions if both parties agreed. The new system is in line with separate mediation allowed for Anglican and Jewish communities in England. Criminal law remains under the gavel of the existing legal system. "There is no reason why principles of sharia law, or any other religious code, should not be the basis for mediation," Britain's top judge, Lord Nicholas Phillips, said in a July 2008 speech (PDF). Supporters of this initiative, such as the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, argue that it would help maintain social cohesion (BBC) in European societies increasingly divided by religion. However some research su ests the r cess to be discriminatory toward women BBC). Other analysts suggest the system has led to grey areas. Britain's Muslims come from all over the world, Ishtiaq Ahmed, a spokesperson for the Council for Mosques in England, told the BBC, noting that this makes it hard to discern at times "where the rulings of the sharia finish and long -held cultural practices start." 1,/ •Government under God. In those Muslim countries where Islam is the official religion listed in the constitution, sharia is declared to be a source, or the source, of the laws. Examples include Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates, where the governments derive their legitimacy from Islam. In Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, and Iraq, among others, it is also forbidden to enact legislation that is antithetical to Islam. Saudi Arabia employs one of the strictest interpretations of sharia. Women are not allowed to drive, are under the guardianship of male relatives at all times, and must be completely covered in public. Elsewhere, governments are much more lenient, as m the United Arab Emirates, where alcohol is tolerated. Non - Muslims are not expected to obey sharia and in most countries, they are the jurisdiction of special committees and adjunct courts under the control of the government. -Completely Secular. Muslim countries where the government is declared to be secular in the constitution include Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Chad, Somalia, and Senegal. Islamist parties rtrn for office occasionally in these countries and sharia often influences local customs. Popular Islamist groups are often viewed as a threat by existing governments. As in Azerbaijan in the 1990s, secularism is sometimes upheld by severe government crackdowns on Islamist groups and political parties. Similar clashes have occurred in Turkey. Under the suspicion that the majority party, the Islamist Justice and Development Party, was trying to establish sharia, Turkey's chief prosecutor petitioned the constitutional court (Economist) in March 2008 to bar the party from politics altogether. One of the politicians indicted, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, told Newsweek, "Turkey has achieved what people said could never be achieved --a balance between Islam, democracy, secularism and modernity." Secular Muslim countries are a minority, however, and the popularity of Islamist political parties are narrowing the z gap between religion and state. V Modern Economies and Sharia Growing at an estimated 15 percent annually, Islamic banking and finance is a worldwide industry that modifies modern business practices to conform to the rules of sharia. Centra to this field is riba, the charging or payment of interest, banned under Islamic law. Clever twists on standard financial products like credit cards, savings accounts, mortgages, loans, and even trust funds bypass the interest business model. A 2008 report by the General Council for Islamic Banks and Financial Institutions estimates the Islamic banking industry to stand at $442 billion. Even big name banks such as Citigroup, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank are developing Islamic banking sectors to cater to the demand. The industry is small in comparison to the global market, but may grow as some non -Muslims are turning to sharia - compliant services. Some of the ethically minded are also switching over to sharia -compliant investments. Businesses are required to avoid transactions related to forbidden things, such as weapons, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, pornography and pork, and investors are guaranteed that their money won't 1 end up financing those industries. Governments are also looking to get a piece of the pie: Malaysia is the largest issuer of sharia -compliant bonds and Indonesia launched its own in January 2009. Islam is no different from CANCER, they are working their way into every culture like a disease & if we don't do something NOW (as described above) then all other cultures will be in serious trouble. WW3 will be Islam against what remains of the free western world. WE CANNOT LET THIS HAPPEN IN OUR COMMUNITY! IF OUR CITY PLANNERS WON'T FIGHT FOR OUR COMMUNITY'S --"--- FREEDOM --FREEDOM WE MUST FIND THOSE THAT WILL! Subject: Denmark, a must read? ? ? ? ? A good place to start a discussion about immigration and reli ion. Not to mention what will happen if we remain . oliticall correct and refuse o do not wish us well. Iwe do not make some tough decisions very soon we will have them made for us by people who want to do us harm. This article could be seen as racist by some but on the other hand it could also be seen as a reflection of our own reality that somehow our politicians refuse to see. Tie interpretation is up to t e teader, however it is food for thought... at there are t ose among us w SALUTE to Denmark... They are trying to fix a huge problem. This could very well happen here on our Continent... Susan MacAllen, a Canadian citizen, is a contributing editor for (FamilySecurityMatters.org ) Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants. The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time. The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free -thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism. Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transporous�ng an education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism .176"c to bite? Dy the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillin_ness to inte:rate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim -exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more voca a out what they const tired the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing va u.es. el;ef in persona i • erty an s free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history. An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted, accurately, that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported: 'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.' 'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue C given that practically all the female victims are non -Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are oan rn other crimes:. 'Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers they wish less to mix with the indi^enous po .ulation. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent o young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dan& 'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem.' 'Muslim leaders openl declare their _oal of introducin_ Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enoug - a not -that -remote prospect. If presen trens persis , one socio ogist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.' It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and - A' - Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who o •ted to leave the Muslim faith have been mindere• in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened an grassed o• enl by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who, as a teenager, had dreaded eros nis g the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today. In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non -generous ideas about liberal 7/ unfettered immigration. Today, Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. (Its c " ort to protect itse as been met wit accusa ions -o 'racism by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too -lax immigration.) If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test, r 3. You must lire in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. if you wish to bring a spouse into enrn.ark, you must boti be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't. In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immi_rants on the Danish welfare system, and it was hor�fyin : the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare stem, as it existed, was bein ex lo.ited by immigrants to theint of�ventu ilY bankrupting the government. 'We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration. 'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,' he said. A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, ' 1'1 e Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,Hvilshoj says, 'There is an inverse correlation between how man come here and how well. we can receive the foreigners that come. And on us im immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to end in, 'In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.' Hvilshoj has aid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that t e government pay lood move to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for reverwe could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his deman , e argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark. the Muslim reply carpe soafter: henhouse was torched while her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed but she an her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce. Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Canadians clamor for stricter immigration . oli_cies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history. We would do well to look to Denmark, and say as prayer for her future and for our own. Islam is no different from CANCER, they are working their way into every culture like a disease & if we don't do something NOW (as described above) then all other cultures will be in serious trouble. WW3 will be Islam against what remains of the free western world. 17 October 2010 Last updated at 03:51 German Chancellor, Angela Merkel: "immigrants should learn to speak German" Attempts to build a multicultural society in Germany have "utterly failed", Chancellor Angela Merkel says. She said the so-called "multikulti" concept - where people would "live side- by-side" happily - did not work, and immigrants needed to do more to integrate - including learning German. The comments come amid rising anti -immigration feeling in Germany. A recent survey suggested more than 30% of people believed the country was "overrun by foreigners". The study - by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation think-tank - also showed that roughly the same number thought that some 16 million of Germany's immigrants or people with foreign origins ha cometo the country for its social bene its. Foreign workers Mrs Merkel told a gathering of younger members of her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party on Saturday that at "the beginning of the 60s our country called the foreign workers to come to Germany and now they live in our country." She added: "We kidded ourselves a while, we said: 'They won't stay, sometime they will be gone', but this isn't reality." The words "utterly failed" are very strong, but there are also nuanced messages about the usefulness of immigrants in a count that needs skilled labour. She is pitching it very carefully, with important elections coming up in the spring. The tone is very important. The chancellor is basically saying that Germany needs immigrants but im miaants need to do something to get into the society. Germany's charged immigration debate "And of course, the approach [to build] a multicultural [society] and to live side-by-side an. to enjoy eac -r... as failed, utterly al es . In her speech in Potsdam, however, the chancellor made clear that immigrants were welcome in Germany. She specifically referred to recent comments by German President Christian Wulff who said that Islam was "part of Germany", like Christianity and Judaism. Mrs Merkel said: "We should not be a country either which gives the impression to the outside world that those who don't speak German immediately or who were not raised speaking German are not welcome here." Mounting debate There has been intense debate about multiculturalism in Germany in recent months. Correspondents say Mrs Merkel faces pressure from within her CDU and its allies to take a tougher stance and require immigrants to do more to adapt to German society. Earlier this week, Horst Seehofer, the leader of the CDU's Bavarian sister party, the CSU, said it was "obvious that immigrants from different cultures like Turkey and Arab countries, all in all, find it harder" to integrate. Continue reading the main story Your Say: Does multiculturalism work? "'Multikulti' is dead," Mr Seehofer said. Earlier this month the chancellor held talks with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in which the two leaders pledged to do more to improve the often poor integration record of Germany's estimated 2.5 million -strong Turkish community. The debate first heated up in August when Thilo Sarrazin, a senior official at Germany's central bank, said that "no immigrant group other than Muslims is so strongly connected with claims on the- wfare state and crime". Mr Sarrazin has since resigned. `yw - Such recent strong anti -immigration feelings from mainstream politicians come amid an anger in Germany about high unemployment, even if the economy is growing faster than those of its rivals, our correspondent says. He adds that there also seems to be a new strident tone in the country, perhaps leading to less reticence about no -go -areas of the past. April 15, 2010 Geert Wilder?s speech to Holland's Parliament Madam Speaker, allow rye, first, to express my sincere thanks to you personally for having planned a debate on Islam on the very day of my birthday. I could not have wished for a nicer present? Madam Speaker, approximately 1400 years ago war was declared on us by an ideology of hate and violence which arose at the time and was proclaimed by a barbarian who called himself the Prophet Mohammed. I am referring to Islam. Madam Speaker, let me start with the foundation of the Islamic faith, the Koran.The Koran's core theme is about the duty o a ushnas o g t non - Muslims; an Islamic Mein Kampf, in which fight means war, jihad. The Koran is above all a book of war "" a call to butcher non-Muslims.,(2:191, 3:141, 4:91, 5:3), to roast them (456 :330- 9 ~32), and to cause bloodbaths amongst them (47:4). Jews are compared to monkeys and pigs (2:65, 5:60, 7:166), while people who believe in Jesus Christ as the Son of God must according to the Koran be fought (9:30). Madam Speaker, the West has no problems with Jews or Christians, but it does have problems with Islam. It is still possible, even today, for Muslims to view the Koran, which they regard as valid for all time, as a licence to kill. And that is exactly what happens. The Koran is worded in sric away that its instructions are addressed to Muslims for eternity, which includes today's Muslims. This in contrast to texts in the Bible, which is formulated as a number of historical narratives, placing events in a distant past. Let us remind ourselves that it was Muslims, not Jews or Christians, who committed the catastrophic terrorist attacks in New York, Madrid and London; and that it was no coincidence that Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered by a Muslim, Mohammed Bouyeri. Madam Speaker, I acknowledge that there are people who call themselves Muslims and who respect our laws. My party, the Freedom Party, has nothing against such people, of course. However, the Koran does have something against them. For it is stated in the Koran in Sura 2, verse 85, that those believers who do not believe in everything the Koran states will be humiliated and receive the severest punishment; which means that they will roast in Hell. in other words, people who call themselves Muslims but who do not believe, for example, in Sura 9, verse 30, which states that Jews and Christians must be fought, or,rampie, in ura 5, verse 38, , hie status that the hard of a t,aref mit be cut off, such people will be humiliated and roast in Hell. Note that it is not me who is making this up. All this can be found in the Koran. The Koran also states that Muslims who believe m only part of the Koran are in fact apostates, and we know what has to happen to apostates. They have to be killed. Madam Speaker, the Kor2n is a book that incites to violence. I rernind the House that the distribution of such texts is unlawful according to Article 132 of our Penal Code. In addition, the Koran incites to hatred and calls for murder and mayhem. The distribution of such texts is made punishable by Article 137(e). The Koran is therefore a highly dangerous book; a book which is completely against our legal order and our democratic institutions. In this light, it is an absolute necessity that the Koran be banned for the defence and reinforcement of our civilisation and our constitutional state. I shall propose a second -reading motion to that effect. Madam Speaker, there is no such thing as "moderate Islami".... As Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said the other day, and T quote, "There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that's it".... Islam is in pursuit of dominance. It wishes to exact its imperialist agenda by force on a worldwide scale (8:39). This is clear from European history. Fortunately, the first Islamic invasion of Europe was stopped at Poitiers in 732; the second in Vienna in 1683. Madam Speaker, let us ensure that the third Islamic invasion, which is currently in full spate, will be stopped too in spite of its insidious nature and notwithstanding the fact that, in contrast to the 8th and 17th centuries, it has no need for an Islamic army because the scared "dhimmis"® in the West, also those in Dutch politics, have left their doors wide open to Islam and Muslims. Apart from conquest, Madam Speaker, Islam is also bent on installing a totally different form of law and order, namely Sharia law. This makes Islam, apart from a religion for hundreds ofion rmil s of Muslims also, and in particular, a political ideology (with political/constitutional/Islamic basic values, etc). Islam is an ideology without any respect for others; not for Christians, not for Jews, not for non -believers and not for apostates. Islam aims to dominate, subject, kill and wage war. Madam Speaker, the Islamic incursion must be stopped. Islam is the Trojan Horse in Europe. If we do not stop Islamification now, Eurabia and Netherabia will just be a matter of time. One century ago, there were approximately 50 Muslims in the Netherlands. Today, there are about 1 million Muslims in this country. were will it end? We are heading for the end of European and Dutch civilisation as we know it. Where is our Prime Minister in all this? In reply to my questions in the House he said, without batting an eyelid, that there is no question of our country being Islamified. Now,. this reply constituted a historical error as soon as it was uttered. Very many Dutch citizens, Madam Speaker, experience the presence of Islam around them. And I can report that they have had enough of burkas, headscarves, the ritual slaughter of animals, so-called honour revenge, blaring minarets, female circumcision, hymen restoration operations, abuse of homosexuals, Turkish and Arabic on the buses and trains as well as on town hall leaflets, halal meat at grocery shops and department stores, Sharia exams, the Finance Minister's Sharia mortgages, and the enormous overrepresentation of Muslims in the area of crime, including Moroccan street terrorists. In spite of all this, Madam Speaker, there is hope. Fortunately. The majority of Dutch citizens have become fully aware of the danger, and regard Islam as a threat to our culture. My party, the Freedom Party, takes those citizens seriously and comes to their defence. Many Dutch citizens are fed up to the back teeth and yearn for action. However, their representatives in The Hague are doing precisely nothing. They are held back by fear, political correctness or supply electoral motives. This is particularly clear in the case of PvdA, the Dutch Labour Party, which is afraid of losing Muslim voters. The Prime Minister said in Indonesia the other day that Islam does not pose any danger. Minister Donner believes that Sharia law should be capable of being introduced in the Netherlands if the majority want it. Minister Vogelaar babbles about the future Netherlands as a country with a Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition, and that she aims to help Islam take root in Dutch society. In saying this, the Minister shows that she has obviously gone stark raving mad. She is betraying Dutch culture and insulting Dutch citizens. Madam Speaker, my party, the Freedom Party, demands that Minister Vogelaar retract her statement. If the Minister fails to do so, the Freedom Party parliamentary group will Withdraw its support for her. No Islamic, tradition must ever be established in the Netherlands: not now and also not in a few centuries' time. Madam Speaker, let me briefly touch on the government's response to the WRR [Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy] report. On page 12 of its response, the government states that Islam is not contrary to democracy or human rights. All 1 can say to that is that things can't get much more idiotic than this. Madam. Speaker, it is a few minutes to twelve. If we go on like this, Islam will herald the end of our Western civilisation as well as Dutch culture. I would like to round off my first -reading contribution with a personal appeal to the Prime Minister on behalf of a great many Dutch citizens: stop the Islamification of the Netherlands! Mr Balkenende, a historic task rests on your shoulders. Be courageous. Do what. many Dutch citizens are screaming out for. Do what the country needs. EtStop all immigration from Muslim countries, ban all building of new mosques, close all Islamic schools, ban burkas anle Koran. Expel all criminal Muslims from the country, including those Moroccan street errorists that drive people mad. Accept your responsibility! . Stop Islamification! Enough is enough, Mr Balkenende. Enough is enough. Courts Placate Islamists by David J. Rusin ® Mar 5, 2010 at 10:39 am Even as Shari'a courts sprout up like mushrooms on UK soil, secular ones across Europe increasingly bend to an Islamist worldview. Consider the phenomenon of exempting Muslims from the standard practice of rising before judges. In January, seven radicals on trial for shouting insults at British soldiers during`a 2009 homecoming parade refused to stand when the judge entered — because, in the words of one of their lawyers, "it is a grave and cardinal sin to show respect in this way to anyone other than God himself." The response from Judge Carolyn Mellanby? Appeasement and more appeasement: Eventually, a compromise was reached where they would enter the court. after her during the trial, which is expected to last six days. The maximum penalty each of the men can receive is a £1,000 fine. The defendants were given an extra 20 minutes on top of their lunch break to go to pray at a mosque a few minutes' walk away. A separate "quiet" room has been set aside for their regular prayer intervals for the rest of the week. Mellanby "said she did not wish to 'set a precedent' by charging them with contempt of court." Instead, it was the defendants themselves who apparently "set a precedent" here. Also of note: Five were convicted in the harassment case but went unpunished. Ordered to reimburse court costs only, the men gleefully declared that, as they are on welfare, taxpayers will foot the bill. In the Netherlands, the bar association is leading the way to mollify Islamists. An appeals chamber of that organization recently overturned a reprimand of attorney Mohammed Enait, who had been censured because he does not rise for judges and dons an Islamic hat in court sessions. It ruled that he can remain seated and wear his head covering; as the article explains, the panel found that "his refusal to rise and his headgear are not meant to show contempt of court." (Be sure to read the humorous passage about Enait and his "secretaries" at the above link.) Other events demonstrate the growing deference to Islam in Europe's courtrooms: A woman made history last summer by becoming the first in Denmark to testify while wearing a niqab. Earlier this year, Judge Cherie Blair, wife of Tony, drew fire for her leniency toward a British Muslim convicted of assault, to whom she said, "You are a religious man and you know this is not acceptable behavior." Finally, foot -washing basins have been installed in a German courthouse so Muslims can clean themselves before prayer; a spokesman justified the facility by "saying that in the past toilets have been stopped up with toilet paper and used for feet washing." How drenching one's feet with toilet water advances cleanliness is unclear. Equally difficult to grasp is how Europe's legal establishment could think that this spate of accommodations will inspire anything but more and more outrageous demands from Islamists. 1 Council on American -Islamic Relations Launches `Islamophobia' Division Tuesday, October 12, 2010 By Patrick Goodenough Nihad Awad, national executive director for the Council on American - Islamic Relations (CAIR), speaks at a news conference in Washington on Dec. 9, 2009. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert) (CNSNews.com) — Spurred by the controversies over Quran-burning and the planned Ground Zero mosque, the most visible Islamic advocacy organization in the United States says it is launching a department to deal with "Islamophobia." In doing so, the Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) is following the example of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the 57 - member bloc of Islamic states. The OIC set up an "observatory" five years ago to monitor and report on incidents and trends around the world it regards as amounting to "Islamophobia." CAIR, which calls itself "America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization," said in a statement Monday that its executive director, Nihad Awad, had announced the move at the group's annual banquet, held in Arlington, Va. on Saturday. ( Why insult Americans?) "We have seen a small but vocal group of bigots and hate -mongers manufacture an atmosphere of anti -Islam hysteria through smear campaigns that rely on distortions, misinformation and outright falsehoods," Awad said. The statement said the new "Islamophobia" department would produce an annual report tracking "trends in rhetorical attacks on Islam and Muslims and will offer accurate and balanced information to be used in the struggle for tolerance and mutual understanding." It would also "organize conferences, seminars, cultural exchanges, and other activities and events designed to provide opportunities for education and dialogue." "It will take joint efforts by people of goodwill of all faiths to challenge this epidemic of hate," Awad said. (How about if they would be transparent) The term "Islamophobia" has become widely used in recent years despite criticism — even from some Muslims — about a term which etymologically suggests an irrational fear or horror of Muslims or Islam. (The horror is in Sharia Law and the Quran) Critics say proponents use the word to cover everything from acts of unjustified discrimination targeting Muslims to legitimate opposition to Islamic tenets, practices, leaders or institutions. CAIR itself has labeled "Islamophobes" critics who have drawn attention to the fact that the organization was named by federal prosecutors in 2007 among "unindicted co-conspirators" in a case against the Holy Land Foundation in Texas. Five former Holy Land organizers were convicted the following year of providing support to the Palestinian terrorist group, Hamas. Islamophobia is "a wretched concept that confuses criticism of Islam as a religion and stigmatization of those who believe in it," a group of writers and intellectuals, including British author Salman Rushdie, said in a joint 2006 statement condemning Islamism as a "reactionary ideology." Although increasingly fashionable since 2001, the term "Islamophobia" predated the 2001 terror attacks and their aftermath. A Nexis search suggests that the earliest usage in media reports came around 1990, when a Soviet Academy of Sciences academic told an Uzbekistan - based newspaper that "Islamophobia" on the part of Soviet leaders could lead to an "Islamic explosion." In 1995, Jordan's Prince Hassan, brother of the late King Hussein, used the word in an address at the U.N. General Assembly. "The attention of this body should be turned to the spreading of Islamophobia," he said. "This phenomenon occurs in all manner of ways, from the purely verbal to the bluntly physical. Its proponents deal in inflammatory rhetoric. They preach the inevitability of cultural apocalypse, tarring all Moslems with the brush of fanatical extremism." ( Like strapping bombs on children?) In 1996 a British think tank focused on multiethnic affairs, the Runnymede Trust, set up a body called the Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia, which the following year produced a report entitled "Islamophobia: A challenge for us all." As the decade progressed Iranian diplomats used the term more and more frequently at the U.N. and its now -defunct Commission on Human Rights, describing the phenomenon as "the perception of Islam and its followers as threats to the West." (In their words to kill Christians, Jews and Americans.) The OIC in 1999 introduced its first resolution at the Commission on Human Rights on what it calls "religious defamation" and over the ensuing decade has passed one at the U.N. every year. Initially the annual resolutions referred to problems like "stereotyping" or "xenophobia" but from the middle of the 1990s the term "Islamophobia" was introduced. Today it appears regularly in U.N. documents, and the OIC last month called on the U.N.'s top human rights official to start tracking "Islamophobia." The U.S. State Department has in recent years used the term periodically — sometimes in quotes, sometimes not — m annual human rights and religious freedom. (As in free speech) In a joint op-ed published in several European newspapers last month, President Obama's envoy to the OIC, Rashad Hussain, and special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism, Hannah Rosenthal, wrote, "We are deeply aware of the growing anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hatred, rhetoric and bigotry that have blossomed worldwide." makaigsPP ifinihedred Aaron C1erU fit4 pikom fiscimafters. IcTV shoulaCl33.%, fthelz nfcr.dasobedierice. 0 e ..-Center ofTemeciila tiiia*Tt lecture ° If the IC'EV des not bo ei06 witht :tffe1a;r,,ps,e•rea-. qsuze, the; P.fl`duid. PP9rtal.1-011-6t6aea :dthnonsttions .eacl iinfavr .guesallifrJearc51*-,,, emecul :41 E ` eA��.. r � a W 9- \a eoRivers\ )rang}§un§ )4\0: m a Three pe iple werearrested i amages vere esfim to t :$x,000 In Aught 200 , tt1B Earth'LrberatIo aFront ti e Iaamedresponsab1hty for arsoritoa:uewhousiiig development near San Diego The group was protesting sprawtand �ideveiog ent heplanned La Rolla Crossroad's cdmp1e� contemplated T,560 :40-71.6.;" ing initsmcludng]ow �rcorne and market rate rentaI aP` men 'afi cgit ,� Ieaitiutcthe arretA tYazrret rcfreas an, 9 thobelieved a thakDaineI d eaaSan Diegawasytmvo veciAnse trtzgtlus�tim>a ; a Q kA ftei San Diego may not she"rn Irke a courterterror ; rsns hot spot, ho never, lodlc ciase'and yo -4, fund 7mted Mates Coast ',uard elieopters buzzuxgg over cad and scientists deuel ne of , a ton airport e ctor currently �tr€der derreIop rnent at LTC.San Diego and the Salklnstitute t renords fac4a express scans ofpassengersbefore they board a plane ;it rs designed to;show how niappropriate facial expressac�ris rrnghtncovea poteYi ial fe or s `� , , Terorista aretrA1Pedlo keel cool ctndez pressure, however, the systez sensitive enough to coon teract that evas�vezneas orwsits athi'foiiiicfi 4narm. es by several op Irarnan of C011iNalll 2 .PS9 ear arilW 471711119,,Va pkunito kinOn n could he a long have heen chrected Li in Aran; at :pp 111 f the go ern m&it uIti Iran e ovottigieit, clx9riph, Telronsni rOtt ; Al Qaeda Cleric's Recordings Sold at Va. Store By Erick Stakeibeck CBN News Terrorism Analyst Wednesday, June 02, 201ORSS WASHINGTON -- Some U.S. intelligence officials believe al Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki is now the worlds most influential Islamic terrorist, surpa.ssinrg even Osarna bin Laden. In recent months, al-A1waki's jihad ''street creel" has risen to new levels. He exchanged e-mails with Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hassan and rnentored. Christmas Day "underwear bomber" Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. He also reportedly served as the inspiration for Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad. For more on this investigation, Pat Robertson spoke with CBN News Terrorism Analyst Erick Stakelbeck on the Wednesday, June 2 edition of The 700 Club. Click play to watch the interview. U.S. officials want al-Awlaki taken out. hey missed that chance just a few years back, when al-Awlaki was imam of .)ifthe D.. al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Va., a suburb of Washington, D.C. Al-Awlaki has since fled to Yemen. But a CBN News investigation has revealed that the al Qaeda cleric's presence is still being felt in the leafy suburb of Falls Church, just minutes from the nation's capital. The Last Place You'd Look It seems like the last place you'd find CDs and DVDs by al Awlaki. But that's exactly what CBN News found during a recent visit to Halalco, a Muslim supermarket in Falls Church. Halalco is the largest store of its kind in the Washington, D.C. area. In addition to halal meat, the store carries a large selection of Islamic books, recordings and clothing. In an exclusive investigation, CBN News discovered that Halalco was also selling CDs and DVDs by none other than aI-Awlaki. In t e. store, was a display devoted entirely to al-Avglaki,'s works just one day after he released a video calling for the killing of U.S. civilians. When Halaco's management was asked for comment, CBN News was told to come back the following day to speak with store owner Abdul Mateen Chida. The next day, the al-Awlaki display was gone. CBN News asked Chida about the sudden change. "Lite have removed them now," he replied. When asked whether the display would still be up had CBN News never inquired about it, Chida answered, "...it is possible." Anti-Semitic Materials for Sale Chida told CBN News the Awlaki display contained no violent materials. He says he was just trying to sell them off and make some money. "I don't agree with him at all," Chida said. "But his lectures that he had earlier were excellent --they were very good sellers. And there is nothing in this one which would you can say is terrorist material." Former federal terrorism prosecutor Andrew McCarthy told CBN News that doesn't always matter. "I prosecuted a guy a number of years ago named the Blind Sheikh whose commands to violence were usually couched in sometimes lengthy sermons," explained McCarthy, whose new book is called The Grand Jihad. "So when somebody says to you, 'not to worry, he's just talking about the prophet (Mohammed),' that's when you should start to worry." CBN News purchased additional materials at Halalco, including notorious anti-Semitic works like The Protocols of Zion and The International Jew and a book by Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who has voiced support for Iraqi insurgents and suicide bombings against Israeli civilians. CBN News also found copies of a book written by convicted.terrorist Abu Hamza. al-vlasri. Chida said he did not know that al- asri was a convicted terrorist. He said he is unaware of the contents of his books and orders them based on their titles. 1rrChida was asked if young Muslims could be inspired to commit -violence by some of the materials sold at Halalco. "Those things, no one can control," he answered. Protected by the First Amendent As for al-Awlaki, CBN News also found his materials for sale at Amazon.com. The online bookselling giant did not respond to a request for comment. However, a spokesperson from the FBI's Washington, D.C. field office told CBN News that al-Awlaki's recordings are protected under the First Amendment. Sharia Flaw: Y.S., Group Aims for Islamic DorninationBy .Erick Stakelbeck CBN News Terrorisrn Analyst Thursday, July 0S, 2OIOSS The latest version of Adobe Flash Player is recuired to watch this video, Please click on the link below to downioad the latest version, Thanks! Ad Feedback For most Americans, July is a time to celebrate their country's freedom and independence. But one radical Islamic group will do the opposite. In fact, Hizb ut-Tahrir believes in the abolishment of the U.S. Constitution by way of a worldwide Islamic state, or c. ip ate. CBN News Terrorism Analyst Erick Stakelbeck reported the upcoming Hizb ut-Tahrir event on U.S. soil on the latest episode of his new CBN News show, 'Stakelbeck on Terror'. The segment on the program was entitled "Sharia Flaw," and featured Stakelbeck's analysis. Stakelbeck appeared on The 700 Club to explain more about the Islamic group and why they are so dangerous. Click play to watch the interview. "The Islamists who want to impose sharia law in America don't just have regional aspirations," Stakelbeck explained. "They want global Islamic domination. One influential group that preaches exactly that is Hizb-ut-Tahrir." The terror -linked group wants to see a worldwide Islamic state -or caliphate --re-established. Although the group has been banned in Germany, Russia, the Netherlands and many Middle Eastern countries, Hizb ut-Tahrir is still welcome in the United States. Watch the group's Internet promotion for their upcoming conference outside of Chicago, by clicking here. 'Welcome to America. Give us your tired, your poor and your Islamic jihadists," Stakelbeck said. "Subduing the world under an Islamic caliphate a® it's just another in a long list of sharia flaws," Hizb ut-Tahrir's event was originally slated to be held at a Marriot Hotel outside of Chicago on July 11, but the hotel cancelled the event due to public pressure. The group will now hold the conference in late July at an as -yet -undisclosed location. U.S. -born cleric Anwar Al-Avviaki called on Muslims to kill The cleric, who r.oved. T; " .as..p�oscv.klI nation osition, saying the anistan and other Is al Awlaki the next °sarna bin Laden? CBN News Terror Analyst Erick Stakelbeck offers more insight, as seen on Monday's edition of Newswatch. Click play for his comments. He added that American civilians are to blame because "the American people, in general, are taking part in this and they elected this administration and they are financing the war." Some believe al Awlaki's Internet messages have been instrumental in inspiring attacks like last year's shooting at Fort Hood and the foiled effort to blow up a jetliner bound for Detroit on Christmas Day. "Those who might be killed in a plane are merely a drop of water in a sea," he said in the video in response to a question about Muslim groups that disapproved 1of the airliner plot because it targeted civilians. Meanwhile, the White House has vowed to continue to hunt al Awlaki, who has reportedly been added to the CIA's list of targets for assassination. "The president will continue to take action directly at terrorists like Awlaki and keep our country safe from their murderous thugs," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told CBS's "Face the Nation" on Sunday. American -born imam Calls U.S. Muslims to 'Jihad TBNNews.com Thursday, March 18, CAIRO - In -an audio -taped message, an American -born imam called U.S. Muslims to jihad ("holy" war) against America. In heavily accented. English, Anwar al-Awiaki, born in New Mexico to Yemini parents, said every Muslim must eventually decide, as he did, to obey Islam's call for jihad against America. "I eventually came to the conclusion that jihad against America is binding upon myself just as it is binding on every other Muslim," al-Awaki said. CNN aired excerpts of his latest message on Wednesday. "To the Muslims in America I have this to say: how can your conscience call you to live in peaceful coexistence with.a nation responsible for the tyranny and crimes against your own brothers and sisters? How can you have loyalty to a government leading the war against Islam -and Muslims?" he asked. AI-Awlaki, who is believed to be in hiding in Yemin, was in close e-mail contact with Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, indicted for shooting down 13 soldiers at the Ft. Hood Array base in Texas this past November. He may also have contacted Umar Farouk Abduhnutallab, the "Christmas Day bomber," sent to blow up a passenger Northwest airliner on its approach to the Detroit airport. "Our brother, Umar Farouk, has succeeded in breaking through the security systems that have cost the U.S. government alone over $40 billion since 9/11," al-Awlaki said in an excerpt provided by the SITE Intelligence, a group that monitors Islamic Web sites. Key Al Qaeda Leader Killed Meanwhile, U.S. officials say the man suspected of masterminding an attack on a CIA base in Afghanistan is dead. Hussein al Yemeni, a top al Qaeda planner and explosives expert, was reportedly killed in a U.S. missile strike in the Miran Shah area of Pakistan on Wednesday. He is believed to have plotted the bombing that killed. seven CIA employees last December. "Al- would be the latest victory in a systematic campaign that has pounded al Qaeda and its allies, depriving them of leaders, plotters, and fighters," a U.S. counterterrorism official told CNN. "For thein, there can be neither- safety nor rest." in the past two years, U.S. government intelligence agencies have identified more than a dozen American Muslims actively pursuing jihad. Former terrorist Walid Shoebat, reveals disturbing contradictions between Ground Zero mosque founder Tmarn Faisal Abdul Rauf s English statements and his Arabic comments. Abdul Rauf directly contradicted his New York Daily News article from earlier this week, and, in the process, lied to New York City about his true intentions. King Abdullah wants e Israel and Iran off the map Posted By David Kenner n ryi . esda :lune 29, 0 `:6 PM Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah probably refrained from expressing at least half this sentiment in his meeting today with President Obama: On June 5, he reportedly told French Defense Minister Herve Morin that "There are two countries in the world that do not deserve to exist: Iran and Israel." The scoop comes from Georges Malbrunot, a French journalist with Le Figaro. Malbrunot, a respected Middle East correspondent who spent four months as a hostage of the Islamic Army in Iraq, goes on to report that two sources, from diplomatic and military circles, have confirmed the story. He suggests that the anger directed as Israel was the result of the IDF raid on the Gaza -bound flotilla, which occurred just days before this outburst. (Hat tip goes to the eagle- eyed correspondents at Friday Lunch Club). Update: Of course, the White House statement following the Obama-Abdullah meeting reaffirmed both leaders' sincerest hope that the current round of proximity tags will Lead to "two states luring side- by-side in peace and security." Asked how to define the enemy, Mr. Korb answered:, "Al Qaeda, T 1U1t": w fl_ ,t we went in there fora" Mr. Brennan said that describing the enemy, as. Islamists "would actually be cotmterproducti ve. It would play into the false perception that they are y religious leaders defending. a holy a ai.ue, i�i"hen in fact they are 'ot i L _ �'r than murderers, ! 'd i O L murder of thousands upon thousands of Ir. Obarna made an outreach to Muslim countries one of his early priorities as president. He has praised Islam and its contributions to American life. His new NASA director recently said one of his agency's "foremost" goals is reaching out to Muslims. The Petraeus counterinsurgency manual takes the position that, to understand the enemy, commanders must recognize terrorist links to Islam — its leaders in some cases, its fundraising and its infrastructure. Forces must fight "Islamic extremists," it says, differently from the Viet Gong or followers of Saddam Hussein. "Islamic extremists use perceived threats to their religion by outsiders to mobilize support for their insurgency and justify terrorist tactics," the manual states. c.,,_ . In a section on the ideological source for Islamic terrorists, the doctrine says, "For many Muslims, the Caliphate produces a positive image of the golden age © s auric civilization. This image mobilizes support for al Qaeda among some of the most traditional Muslims While concealing the details of the movement's goal. In fact, al Qaeda's leaders envision the 'restored Caliphate' as a totalitarian state similar to the pre -2002 Taliban regime in Afghanistan." The manual also discusses support networks for "Islamic extremists:" "A feature of today's operational environment deserving mention is the effort by Islamic extremists, including those that advocate violence, to spread their influence through the funding and use of entities that share their views or facilitate them to varying degrees. These entities may or may not be threats themselves; however, they can provide passive or active support to local or distant insurgencies." Among these support goups, it says, are "religious schools and mosques." In the successful prosecution of an Islamic charity in Dallas that fiinneled money to the designated terrorist group Hamas, the U.S. Justice Department listed scores of U.S.-based Islamic groups as unindicted co-conspirators. 3/:‘ r l-Qa da warns of new attacks deadlier than before By PAUL SCHEMM (AP) — 2 days ago d President Barack �CAIRO---- ��-(�aida's U.S.-bornspokesman? warned Obama Sunday that the militant group may launch new attacks that would kill more Americans than previous ones. -In a taunting, 24 minute message that dwelled on Obama's setbacks, including the loss of Massachusetts Senate seat to the Republicans, Adam Gadahn set out al-Qaida's conditions for peace with the U.S., including cutting support for Israel and withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. Gadahn said that if you compared the number of dead Muslims "with the relatively small number of Americans we have killed so far, it becomes crystal-clear that we haven't even begun to even the score," he said, dressed in a white robe and turban. "That's why next time, we might not show the restraint and self-control we have shown up until now," he said. Even if al-Qaida was defeated, "hundreds of millions of Muslims" would still fight the U.S., he added. Al-Qaida offered the same conditions for an end to hostilities to then President George W. Bush in 2007, including the release of all Muslim prisoners and cutting off aid to Middle East governments. Gadahn's statement was notable for its mocking tone, in whichht dewscribed abed Obama as "a devious, evasive and serpentine American pr Muslim name," and seemed to delight in his setbacks. "You're no longer the popular man you once were, a year ago or so," he crowed, ascribing his drop in popularity to the escalation of the U.S. wars abroad. At the time of Obama's election, many analysts said al-Qaida was worried that his race and Muslim family connections would make him more appealing to Muslims and Arabs angry at Bush's foreign policy. In. its statements since his election, al-Qaida has taken pains to show the continuity between Obama's foreign policy and that of his predecessor. Gadahn is wanted by the FBI since 2004 with a $1 million rewardfor information leading to his arrest or conviction. He is also knownas Azzam al-Amriki, Arabic for the American. AMexico thwartsHezbollah American network to set up South Militant r employed Mexican nationalsi ties to Lebanon to target Israel and the West, Kuwaiti newspaperreport By jack :ho u :° and Haaretz Service Tags; Israel news • ez;_ Mexico foiled an attempt by Hezbollah to establish a network in South America, a Kuwaiti newspaper reported on Tuesday. Hezbollah operatives employed Mexicans nationals with family ties to Lebanon to set up the network, designed to target Israel and the West, the Al- eyassah daily said. According to the report, Mexican police mounted a surveillance operation on the group's leader, Jameel Nasr, who traveled frequently to Lebanon to receive information and instructions from Hezbollah commanders there. Hezbollah leder Hassan Nasrailah. Photo by: Reuters Police say Nasr also made frequent trips to other countries in Latin .America, including a two-month stay in Venezuela in the summer of 2008.. Nasr was living in Tijuana, Mexico at the time of his arrest, the report sad. The report follows warnings from the United States that Hezboliah and its backer Iran are stepping up operations in the region. In kine,, a US. congresswoman wrote to the Department of Homeland Security to warn that Hezbollah was increasing its presence in Central and South Arnerica In her letter, Congresswoman Sue Myrick called on the U.S. to work with Mexican forces, as there was intelligence that Hezbollah was working in conjunction with Mexican drug cartelstico border._ In 2009 a U.S. commander tasked with overseeing U.S. military interests in the region said Hezbollah was linked to drug-trafficking in Colombia. "We have seen.,. an increase in a wide level of activity by the Iranian government in this region," Admiral James Stavridis told the Senate Armed Services Committee. That is a concern principally because of the connections between the government of Iran, which is a state sponsor of terrorism, and Hezbollah," he said. ( In February a U.S. court in Miami indicted three men for raising funds for Hezbollah, which the U.S. classifies as a terrorist organization. Hezbollah is believed to have been behind the •bombing of a Jewish cultural center in the Argentinean capital Buenos Aires in 19941 in which 85 people were killed. 'We are killed because we are Christians' Life is becoming increasingly dangerous for the Christian community of crag Deborah Haynes in Nineveh Plains, Iraq One grey-haired woman understands more than most the fear that has gripped Iraq's beleaguered Christian community over the past month. Her brother, Bashar al-Hazim, was among the first to be murdered in a wave of targeted killings that has forced more than 2,000 Christian families to flee the northern city of Mosul. Masked gunmen walked up to Mr Hashim as he stood with his two children outside their house in the east -side of Mosul in late September. They demanded to see his identity card, confirmed he was Christian and executed the 41 -year-old on the spot. RELATED LINKS • Tug-of-war for Iraqi minority groups Iraq: Battle for business begins "I could have died when 1 found out. He was a dear brother and was killed in a very despicable way," said the woman, 60, who was too afraid to give her name. She, liKe thousands of other Christians who have left the city since the start of October, claims to have no idea who carried out the attack. Fear of potential repercussions appears to prevent many in the region from speaking heir mind. "We're peacguil-people. VVhen my brother was executed he had •no enemies. Why was he killed? He was nota member of a party. There was no reason except for being Christian," the woman, dressed in a black gown, said. Terror Ter or Radical ishmist Group is Returning to Chicago for Maio - Recruitment Drive By Diane Macedo Published June 16, 2010 I FOXNews.co . YouTube video promoting the Khilafah Con erence 2011 as more than 13,000 views. They're back. A radical Islamist group critics say has links to Al Qaeda is gearing up to host its second annual U.S. recruiting event. The group, Hizb ut-Tahrir America, which is committed to establishing a caliphate, or international Islamic empire, kicked up controversy in Chicago last year with its first U.S. conference, "Fall of Capitalism & Rise of Islam." Speakers at the conference blamed capitalism for everything from. two World Wars to Michael Jackson's decision "to shed his black skin." It drew more than 500 attendees, dozens of protesters and a heavy police presence. Now the group is coming back to the Windy City with its second conference, "Emergin World Order: How the Khilafah Will Shape the World.." schedu e. to begin my at the Chicago �` arriott 0 roo According to a video promoting the event, the goal is to ersuade attendees to "answer the call" to "join the campaign" for a Khilafah, or global Islamic empire. Despite the charged message, the group insists that it advocates change only through nonviolent means. Terrorism "is not in our dictionary," spo an Mohammad Malkawi told reporters last year. "We condemn it by all means ... From our perspective, our records are clean on this issue." But some experts say the group's rhetoric masks its true role: preparing the infantry for groups like Al Qaeda by indoctrinating young j ihadists. ("Hizb ut-Tahrir realized that U.S. laws, iti tl iS sta.� allow lien to i oak u. detered as lon _ as the use a narrative that foo the s ublic and law enforcement," 'valid. Phares, director of the Future of Terrorism Project at t:ie ounda. ior: for Defense of Democracies, told FoxNews.eom. He said the group's vision of a worldwide caliphate is "is identical to the Taliban regime but spanning on three continents, as a first stage." Former Hizb ut-Tahrir member Ishtiaq Hussain. agreed. "They don't believe Israel should exist, some of their leaders have denied the Holocaust, and they believe homosexuals should be thrown off the hihest uilding," Hussain, now a trainer or t ie Quilliam Foundation, told FoxNews.corn. "... It's actually a very dangerous group." Phares said Hizb ut-Tahrir's list of alumni.-- including confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Al Qaeda in Iraq's onetime leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi -- speaks for itself. "The bottom line here," he said, "is that we are witnessing the emergence and the ex ransion of a 'ihadist recruitment facto in our midst openly - calling or jihad and for the establishment of a caliphate instead of many ( governments... and in its last stage to what the call jihadism against America and its alliesthat is, tec nically speaking, terrorism and massacre." , Hizb ut-Tahrir America did not respond to requests for comment sent by e- mail. The group's website lists neither a phone number nor a mailing address. - - - At a recent conference in the United Kingdom, Hizb ut-Tahrir spoke direct against the U.S., mocking Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's warning of severe consequences if a Pakistani connection to the Times Square bomber was discovered, and contending that the U.S. was behind terror attacks in Pakistan. Whether there will be similar rhetoric at next month's conference in Chicago is unclear. Unlike last year, the group has no itinerary laid out on its website for this year's conference. The Chicago Marriott Oak Brook confirmed that it would be hosting the conference, but it would not comment on whether it had reviewed the group or was aware of its specific plans for the conference. But news of the hotel chain's hospitality came as a surprise to the Florida Security Council, which said the Marriott of Delray Beach, Fla.., backed out of hosting one of its events last year when it planned to honor an anti- jihadism advocate. The group, which aims to raise awareness of security threats facing Florida and the U.S. by "radical, supremist, Muslims," and "Latin American totalitarianism," is now suing the Marriott for breach of contract. \ "You let lunatics come into our hotel, and then you have peo'le trying to w them out ... e double standard is glaring and obvious and absurd," Florida Security Council Director Tom Trento told FoxNews.com. defend the United States of America and ou thr • Marriott's Corporate Office did not respond to requests for comment on the Hizb ut-Tahrir conference or the Florida case. But Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, President of American Islamic Forum for Democracy, said he thinks the decision of whether or not to host an event like this should be left to the hotel. "It [Hizb ut-Tahrir] is a conveyor belt to terror, there's no doubt about it, but the issue is if we're going to change these hearts and minds and we're going to prevent the future Nidal Hassans of the world, we're not going to do it by making these types of things illegal," Jasser told FoxNews.coin. Instead, Jasser said, the U.S. needs to "start to provide Muslim youth an alternative to where America is not demonized but where we change the narrative and start to promote groups that are reformist." "I'd like us to debate them publicly in order to prove how invalid their ideas are rather than shut them down and make them into victims," he said. "...I think it's the type of thing we need to expose." Hizb ut-Tahrir America, meanwhile, is seeking some exposure of its own. A YouTube video advertising the conference teas amore 13,000 iews a Facebook page promoting the event has more than 2,400 fans, and countless supporters in t e .S. and abroa.:?a`Je "Tweeted" and "ReTweeted," news of the upcoming conference, extending Hizb ut-Tahrir America's reach fax beyond its known followers. With an 11,000 -square -foot ballroom reserved at the Marriott, it apparently expects to acquire many more in Chicago next month. -§AA ),/4- -.)))4Tit/ hJ' Atlas Shrugs Home Archives About Atlas Subscribe Atlas Articles Donate Atlas RSS Feed Video Youtube Search Thursday, July 09, 2009 DIVERSITY VISAS DOUBLE IN JULY FROM SOMALIA AND "PALESTINE" Check out the latest "diversity visa numbers" from hot spots. The numbers from Africa -especially Egypt and Ethiopia' (Somalia) doubled from last month. "Palestine" is chargeable to Egypt and Somalis are chargeable to Ethiopia. "Diversity" visa -- a class of immigrants known as "diversity immigrants." Diversity "visas (DV) each fiscal year are made available to persons from countries that with low rates of immigration to the United States. The Diversity Immigrant Visa program is a lottery program for receiving a United States Permanent Resident Card. It is also known as the Green Card Lottery. Taking into account dependents, there were more than 10 million participants in the DV -2008. The number of applicants for the DV -2009 was 45% higher than for the DV -2008. VISA NUMBERS FOR JULY DIVERSITY (DV -2009) VISA NUMBERS: For July, immigrant numbers in the Diversity Visa category are available to qualified DV -2009 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as listed below: Africa 48,700 Except: Egypt 21,600 [includes "Palestinians""] Ethiopia 21,100 [includes Somalia] Nigeria 14,400 This does not include the arrival in the US of Palestinian Iraqis. Atlanta - The State Department confirmed today that as many as 1,350 Iraqi Palestinians — once the well- treated guests of Saddam Hussein and now at outs with much of Iraqi society — will be resettled in the US, mostly in southern California, starting this fall. It will be the largest -ever resettlement of Palestinian refugees into the US — and welcome news to the Palestinians who fled to Iraq after 1948 but who have had a tough time since Mr. Hussein was deposed in 2003. Targeted by Iraqi Shiites, the mostly -Sunni Palestinians have spent recent years in one of the region's roughest refugee camps, Al Waleed, near Iraq's border with Syria. http ://adasshrugs2000.typepad. com/atlas_shrugs/2009/07/diversity-vi sa-numbers-double-... 12/30/2009 "Really for the first time, the United States is recognizing a Palestinian Tefugee population that could be admitted to the US as part of a resettlement program," says Bill Frelick, refugee policy director at w:= in Washington. Given the US's past reluctance to resettle Palestinians -- it accepted just seven Palestinians in 2007 and nine in 2008 — the effort could ruffle some diplomatic feathers. S dcli .'s guests Palestinian refugees came to Iraq is successive waves over several decades, first in 1948, then in 1967, and La 1991. They were treated well under Hussein but were also used to attack Israeli policies, and their presence was resented by many Iraqis. June 4: DIVERSITY VISA NUMBERS: IMPORTING JIHAD IN THE TENS OF THOUSANDS APRIL: "Diversity Visas" and "Religious Visas": Importing Jihad UPDATE: Streaking of Somalian Muslims: David Kris, Assistant Attorney General for National Security, and Frank J. Magill, U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota announced that on July 9 in Minneapolis, U.S. District Court Judge John Tunheim sentenced Mohammed Abdullah Warsame to 92 months in prison and three years of supervised release. Warsame, a naturalized Canadian citizen of Somali descent, was charged with one count of conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization — al Qaeda. — in a Jan. 20, 2004, indictment returned In the District of Minnesota. A June 21, 2005, superseding indictment also charged Warsame with one count of providing material support to al-Qaeda and three counts of making false statements to the FBI. Warsame pleaded guilty to the material support count of the superseding indictment on May 5, 2°09. The government has agreed as part of a plea agreement to dismiss the remaining charges. "I applaud the many agents, analysts and prosecutors whose tireless efforts led to this sentence. This case serves as a reminder of the continuing threats we face as a nation and our resolve to meet those threats," said David Kris, Assistant Attorney General for National Security. Back in the day, under Bush, when we busted terrorists and killer of performed outreach on them. Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, July 09, 2009 at 10:46 AM in Refugee Resettlement: The quiet Jihad tsunami 1 Permalink Reblog 1 Favorite 1 Digg This 1 Save to del.icio.us 1 Tweet This! TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6aood83q icbobf53efoh1571eo254c97ob Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DIVERSITY VISAS DOUBLE IN JULY FROM SOMALIA AND "PALESTINE" : Comments )/4"--- ilk:. 1 can't help wondering whether people in, say, Minneapolis/St.Paul would think themselves under -represented by Somalis? You will be overrun by Obama s'diversity (cheap labour/sympathetic voter importation) projects - just like we Brits have been for the past 40 years with Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, who bate us and out -breed us. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.comJatlas_shrugs/2009/07/diversity-visa-numb err -double-... 12/30/2009 Note: Duplicate informational packets were sent to all five Planning Commissioners PLANNING COMMISSION Enclosed are articles I have come across and would like you for your review. We have many religions and houses of worshi but none have brought their own laws. All people are welcome who wish to embrace the American values and the Constitution of the United States. I hope the decisions made will be for the good of the citizens of the Temecula area and surrounding communities. erely, briel Fazz 37072 Galileo Lane Murrieta, CA. 92563 > Geert Wilders is a Dutch Member of Parliament. > In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: Who lost > Europe ?' > Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for > Freedom, the > Netherlands , at the Four Seasons, New York , introducing > an Alliance of > Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in > Jerusalem . > Dear friends, > Thank you very much for inviting me. > > I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the > old world. There is > a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be > .optimistic. We > might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. > This not only is > a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, > it is a threat to > America and the sheer survival of the West. The United > States as the last > bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. > First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe > . Then, I will > say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you > about a meeting in > Jerusalem . > > The Europe you know is changing. > You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these > cities, sometimes > a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is > another world. It > is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim > mass -migration. > > All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire > Muslim neighborhoods > where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. > And if they are, > they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. > It's the world of > head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, > with baby > strollers and a group of children Their husbands, or > slaveholders if you > prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street > corners. The > shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be > hard-pressed to find any > economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by > religious > fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are > mushrooming in every > city across Europe . These are the building-blocks for > territorial control > of increasingly larger portions of Europe , street by > street, neighborhood > by neighborhood, city by city. > There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe . With > larger > congregations than there are in churches. And in every > European city there > are plans to build super -mosques that will dwarf every > church in the region. > Clearly, the signal is: we rule. > Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just > take Amsterdam , > Marseille and Malmo in Sweden . In many cities the majority > of the under -18 > population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of C > Muslim > neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys > in many cities. > In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no > longer be mentioned, > because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that > would be an insult > to Muslims. > Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal > food to all • pupils. In once -tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up > almost exclusively by > MuslimNon-Muslim women routinely hear 'whore, whore'. > Satellite dishes are > not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the > country of origin. > In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors > deemed offensive to > Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is > increasingly true of > Darwin . The history of the Holocaust can n� ___ o loner be > taught because of > Muslim sensitivity. > In England sharia courts are now officially part of the > British legal > system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for > women without head > scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up > by Muslims in > Brussels , because he was drinking during the Ramadan. > Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for > the worst wave of > anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly > spoken or, the > streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya , Israel . I could go on C > forever with > stories like this. Stories about Islamization. > > A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe . > San Diego > University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent > of the > population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. > Bernhard Lewis > has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this > century. > > Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be > threatening if the > Muslim -immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But > there are few signs > of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of > French Muslims see > their lo al to Islam as greater tha i E eir 1. alt to > France . One-third > of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The > British Centre for > Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim > students are in > favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they > call 'respect'. And > s is ow we give them respect. We have Muslim official > state holidays. > > The Christian -Democratic attorney general is willing to > accept sharia in the > Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet > members with > passports from Morocco and Turkey 7. > Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging > from petty crimes > and random violence, for example against ambulance workers > and bus drivers, > to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the > low-income suburbs, > the banlieus. I call the perpetrators 'settlers'. Because > that is what they > are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they > come to > integrate our society into their Dar -al -Islam.. Therefore, > t�iey are > settlers. > Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed > exclusively against > non -Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their > neighborhoods, their > cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing > vote not to be > ignore . > The second thing you need to know is the importance of > Mohammed the prophet. > His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be > criticized. Now, if > Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi > and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was (> a warlord, a > mass murderer a pedophile, and had several marriages - at > the same time. > Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he > had his enemies > murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed > himself > slaw htered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good > for Islam, it is > good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. > Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it > has a god, and a > here -after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a > political > ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for > society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect > of life. Islam > means 'submission'. Islam is not compatible with freedom > and democracy, > because w at it strives for is sharia. If you want to > compare Is am to > anything, com are it to communism or national -socialism, > these are al > totalitarian ideologies. > > Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam 'the most > retrograde force > in the world', and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. > The public has > wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees > Israel as the > aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it > dozens of times. I E> > support Israel . First, because it is the Jewish homeland > after two thousand > years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second > because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of > defense. > > This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, > frustrating > Islam's territorial advance. Israel is facing the front > lines of jihad, like > Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines , Southern Thailand, > Darfur in Sudan , > Lebanon , and Aceh in Indonesia . Israel is simply in the > way. The same way > West -Berlin was during the Cold War. ( > > The war against Israel is not a war against Israel . It is > a war against the > West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows > that are meant for > all of us. If there would have been no Israel , Islamic > imperialism would > have found other venues to release its energy and its > desire for conquest. > Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the > army and lay awake > at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and > dream, unaware of > the dangers looming. > > Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order > to address the > grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, > God forbid, to go > down, it woul not ring any solace to the West It would > not mean our Muslim > minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and > accept our > values. On the contrary, the ei__2,4.'sil ive > enormous encouragement > to the force f Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the d> emise of Israel >as ro ha t weak, and doomed. The end of > IsraeI would not mean > the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning It would mean > the start of the final battle for world domination. If they > can get Israel , they can get everything.. So-called journalists volunteer > to label any and > all critics of Islamization as a 'right-wing extremists' or > 'racists'. In my > country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now > sees the mass > immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake > since World War II. > And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. > Yet there is a > greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of > America as the last > man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than > you can imagine. > An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and > democracy, an economic > wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of > military might for > America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies > with atomic bombs. > With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to > preserve the > heritage of Rome , Athens and Jerusalem . ( > Dear friends,liberty is the most precious of gifts. My ro > generation never had > to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver > platter, by > people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout 5 -Europe , mean > cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it > home, and whose > memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; > we are merel >'its Gusto ians;,We can only hand over this hard won liberty > to Europe 's > children in the same state in which it was offered to us. > We canno > deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never > forgive 1.*. --.. e > cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the > right to do so. > > We have to take the necessary action now to stop this > Islamic stupidity from > destroying the free world that we know. C C Obama's Legal State Department Adviser: Impose Sharia Law on America Published by Benyamin Solomon on April 9, 2009 in Opinions Obama's pick as the legal State department adviser sees no wrong in imposing Sharia law, which is one of the most backwards set of fascist -like laws. This wi 1 a so show detai ed analysis on the ra+ ical Islamist threat the bit on the deadly consequences of Sharia law. X --- Sharia law is a type of medieval Fascism. It was a set of laws made up by Islamic scholars and became laws of all the Islamic Caliphates. Now radical Islam seeks to impose it, whether through violent�ihad or through cultural jihad, the latter of which is a jihad to overthrow existing societies [including Fel etc emocratic west] and to impose Sharia law from within. Sharia law controls every aspect of the individual's life. Under Sharia, leaving Islam is punishable by death. Under Sharia, when a women is ra d, she receives the death penalty for adultery while nothing happens to the rapist. That's why hana law appeals to rapist and gets rapists to be radical Islamists. That's a large part why Jihadist Fascism thrives in our [America's] prisons. Sharia law is a totalitarian set of laws that contradicts the US constitution and the vision of the Founding Fathers. America is now becoming a.victim of radical Islam. The cultural jihad is a monster that s a sorbing whatever it can with this Jihadist m octrination. t seeks to eliminate "Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions" [1991 Muslim Brotherhood memo]. The violent Jihad commits terrorist attacks on men, women and children. The cultural jihad backs the violent 'ihad if it's not caught. When it comes to 9/11 and 7 , with the west looking at whether those acts are condemned or not, the cultural jihadists give cheap lip service against them, while supporting terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah by funding them and by indoctrinatin. Muslim s eo le to fight against the non -Muslim infidels. Since t e western world expects Muslims to con emn < 1 Qaeda to be moderate, cultural jihadists man times give cheap lip service against Al Qaeda. The cultural jihadists still ight for the same kind of society Al Qaeda fights for, an Islamo-fascist society ruled by Sharia law. I think I did enough in describing the violent and cultural jihads in radical Islam and showing a little bit about why Sharia law it a totalitarian set of laws. To make it all worse, President Obama chose Harold Koh as the legal adviser for the State Department. Harold Koh says that there's nothing wrong with Sharia law. The NY Post reported that: JUDGES should interpret the Constitution according to other nations' legal "norms." Sharia law could apply to disputes in US courts. The United States constitutes an "axis of disobedience" along with North Korea and Saddam - era Iraq. Those are the views of the man on track to become one of the US government's top lawyers: Harold Koh. President Obama has nominated Koh — until last week the dean of Yale Law School — to be the State Department's legal adviser. In that job, Koh would forge a wide range of international agreements on issues from trade to arms control, and help represent our country in such places as the United Nations and the International Court of Justice. It's a job where you want a strong defender of America's soverei: ty. But that's not Koh. He's a an o "transnational legal process," arguing that the distinctions between US and international law should vanish. What would this look like in a practical sense? We've seen Sharia courts at work. They're never fair. Basically, as the state epartment s egal a. viser Will be someone who sees no wrong in Sharia law, which punishes rape victims instead of rapists and which kills people for leaving Islam. Harold Koh, you've gotta be kidding me. I have no government job. Yet at least I understand the horror of Sharia law. It's people like Harold Koh w o w� to sum non-Muslimsan American Jewmto scond-class Dhimmis. Armenian freedom fighters fought to free the Armenian people from being second-class dhimmis under the Ottoman empire. As a result, the Ottoman Nazi -like leadership carried out a genocidal campaign on the Armenians. Yet we have this Harold Koh fellow who sees nothing wrong with imposing Sharia law and who has no idea what being a Dhimmi is like. The US, as the superpower leading the free world, has anobli ation to protect its 1 and do its part.in protectin the world from radical Islam. Yet how will America do that if the legal adviser for the State De s artment sees no wrong in Sharia la MMidd e East. expert Bernard Lewis said," Europe will be slamic y the end of the century." With Obama America is heading down the same road as Europe, where the cu tural jihad eats more and more of our [America's] institutions. already has Sharia courts and no go zones for the police in those countries where is enfo ecr d Mus xm radicals plan to use t ose areas as bases in order to ex s and to the rest o urope in imposing their assist system, w Bch inc udes Sharia law. Many people will say that the Muslim radicals can't achieve their goals. Whether they can or not, they're still a global threat. Lebanon had a Christian majority. Look what happened. Radical Islamic ou s including Hezbollah are causing trouble and are trying to turn Lebanon into an expansionist Islamist state. If the State Department's legal adviser sees no wrong in having Sharia law, it will bolster the Islamists at the expense of the moderate Muslims who seek to promote a tolerant interpretation of Islam that's compatible to democracy. Obama already made horrible choices on nominees like choosing the tax - cheat Timothy Geitner as Treasury Secretary. Geitner is helping Obama to impose a nanny state Socialist agenda on America. Obama also attempte to c oose Charles Freeman as the head of the National Intelligence Estimate. Mr. Freeman has anti -Israel views, ties to the Saudi regime and also praised the Chinese crackdown on the pro-democracy heroes in Tianamen Square. His choice was controversial. So he didn't accept it and blamed it on the pro - Israel lobby. Now, we have this pro -Sharia law fellow Harold Koh as the State Department's legal adviser. Obama just seems to do a horrible job with nominees. When it comes to choosing horrible nominees, I think President Obama deserves first prize. Plus, Obama understands the violent terror jihad from groups like Al Qaeda, but fails to understand the cultural jihad. Subject: Islam in a nut shell Please take the time >to read this. It explains to me why >we don't hear any objections from the rest of the Muslims in the U.S about > >the Mosque in NYC or the atrocities they are committing around the world, >including Afghanistan . > >Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: >The >Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat > >Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a > >complete, total, 100% system of life. > >Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military > >Components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other >Components. > >Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to >Agitate for their religious privileges. > >When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies Agree > > to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the Other > >components tend to creep in as well. > >Here's how it works: > >As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given >Country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace -loving >Minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in: >United States -- Muslim 0.6% >Australia -- Muslim 1.5% >Canada -- Muslim 1.9% >China -- Muslim 1.8% >Italy -- Muslim 1.5% >Norway -- Muslim 1.8% > >At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities >and >Disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among >Street gangs. This is happening in: > >Denmark -- Muslim 2% >Germany -- Muslim 3.7% >United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7% >Spain -- Muslim 4% >Thailand -- Muslim 4.6% >From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their > >Percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the >Introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby Securing > food >preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure On supermarket >chains >to feature halal on their shelves -- along with Threats for failure >to >comply. This is occurring in: >France -- Muslim 8% >Philippines -- 5% >Sweden Muslim 5% >Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3% >The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5% >Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5..8% >At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them > >To rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic >Law. >The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the Entire > >world. >When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase >Lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , >we Are >already seeing car-burnings. Any non -Muslim action offends Islam >and Results >in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition >To >Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen Daily, >particularly in Muslim sections in: > >Guyana -- Muslim 10% >India -- Muslim 13.4% >Israel -- Muslim 16% >Kenya -- Muslim 10% >Russia -- Muslim 15% >After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad Militia > formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian Churches >and >Jewish synagogues, such as in: >Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8% >At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, > >And ongoing militia warfare, such as in: >Bosnia -- Muslim 40% >Chad -- Muslim 53.1% >Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7% > >From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non -believers of >All other religions (including non -conforming Muslims), sporadic >ethnic >Cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax >Placed — --^----- >on infidels, such as in: >Albania -- Muslim 70% >Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4% >Qatar -- Muslim 77.5% >Sudan -- Muslim 70% > >After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run > >Ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the >Infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced >an In >some ways is on-going in: > >Bangladesh -- Muslim 83% >Egypt -- Muslim 90% >Gaza -- Muslim 98.7% >Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1% >Iran -- Muslim 98% >Iraq -- Muslim 97% >Jordan -- Muslim 92% >Morocco -- Muslim 98.7% >Pakistan -- Muslim 97% >Palestine -- Muslim 99% >Syria -- Muslim 90% >Tajikistan -- Muslim 90% >Turkey -- Muslim 99.8% >United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96% >100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of >Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, >the >Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such) >as >in: > >Afghanistan -- Muslim 100% >Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100% >Somalia -- Muslim 100% >Yemen -- Muslim 100% >Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most > >radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust >by >killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons. » >'Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It >was me >against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family >against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the >tribe against >the world, and all of us against the infidel. Leon Uris, 'The Haj' > (7........_—____________-___ >It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% >Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations >live >in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live >by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. >T ere >are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim >religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate >into >the community at large.. The children attend madrasses. They learn only >the >Koran. To even associate wi an ' fidel is a crime unishab e with death. > >Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists > >exercise more power than the national average would indicate. > >Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. >But >their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, > >Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's >population by the end of this century. > >Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse. >The wolves will be herding the sheep! » >Obama appoints two devout Muslims to Homeland Security posts. Doesn't »this make you feel safer already? > ' >Obama and Janet Napolitano appoint Arif Alikhan, a devout Muslim, > as (i >Assistant Secretary for Policy Development. > >DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano swore in Kareem Shora, a devout Muslim >who >was born in Damascus , Syria , as ADC National Executive Director as a >member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC). >NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified >as >a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant...? Just >Devout. Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions? >Doesn't this make you feel safer already?? >That should make the US ' homeland much safer, huh!! >Was it not "Devout Muslim men" that flew planes into U.S. buildings 8 >years ago? >Was it not a Devout Muslim who killed 13 at Fort Hood ? >Also: This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start >to >finish. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking > out about any atrocities. Cana ood Muslim bea good American? This >question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. >The following is his reply: »> »Theologically - no ... Because his allegiance is to Allah, The >moon >of Arabia > »>Religiously ??no??Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah >except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran) »> >Scripturally - no??Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars >of Islam >and the Quran. »> >Geographically ??no??Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which >he >turns in prayer five times a day. >Socially - no??Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make >friends with Christians or Jews.. »»» >Politically - no?xt,i/2Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual >leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , >the >great Satan. »> >Domestically - no??Because he is instructed to marry four Women and >beat >a rscourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34) »> »> >Intellectually - no??Because he cannot accept the American Constitution >since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be > >corrupt. »> >Philosophically - no??Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not >allow >freedom of religion and expression.. Democracy and Islam cannot co -exist. >Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic. »> >Spiritually - no??Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' >the >Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as >Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent > names. »» >Therefore, after much study and deliberation.... . ->Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS >in this country. - - - They obviously cannot be both 'good' Muslims and >good Americans. >Call it what you wish, it's still the truth. You had better believe x >it. >The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and >our >future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand. >Can a muslim be a good soldier??? >Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, opened fire at Ft. Hood and Killed 13. He >is >a good Muslim ! ! ! > >Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. >SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. • w i st NA G • .4. F all 2..e.. g I i i i n itt—I v 0 i 9 , t T K to t 0 E a 0 g E A 3 C • • 3 . p, P m5 Sharia v. Constitution: It is coming. A showdown in America, not some wild west show, but a real showdown, just like Europe is facing, with Islam. Islam is not a religion but our government is treating it as such. Islam is a theocracy that governs citizens way of life, in the same way the Constitution is the light that governs America (when Congress is not in session). The forces of Islam in America are pushing the boundaries, in the hopes of establishing a Sharia based caliphate in America, and undoing western civilization. For those of you who still do not understand or believe that Islam is a threat, J am going to compare Sharia Law to the Constitution. You shall see that the "religion of peace" is really the religion of pieces, where the children blow up so quickly. ISLAM The religion at peace. Sharia Law is well-documented in the 1,200 page Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, "The Reliance of the Traveler" by Ahrnad ibn Naqib al-Misri, and published in the United States by Amana Publications. The Constitution is, well, the Constitution: LEGISLATIVE POWERS US Constitution Article I - Ali legislative Powers shall be vested in the Congress. Sharia Law The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah. (al.1) It is not a sin to comply with man-made laws that require buying auto insurance or having a photo ID because "the authorities are responsible for the sin, not the individual forced to comply." (w42.3 and w50.4). POWER TO DECLARE WAR US Constitution Section 8 — Powers of Congress include to levy taxes, to make laws, and to declare war. Sharia Law It is obligatory to obey the commands and interdictions of the caliph or his representative in everything that is lawful, even if he is unjust .. because the purpose of his authority is Islamic unity, which could not be realized if obeying him were not obligatory. (o25.5) The caliph or his representative have the duty of undertaking jihad if their territory borders on enemy lands, of dividing the spoils of battle, and of remitting a fifth for "deserving recipients." (o25.9(8)) Jihad is obligatory for everyone when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims. (o9.3) It is permissible in jihad to cut down the enemy's trees and destroy their dwellings. (o9.1) PRESIDENT (CALIPH) US Constitution Article II, Section I -- Qualifications of a President — He must be a natural born citizen, thirty-five years old, and a resident for fourteen years. The President is elected by ballot by the people (via the Electors) and shall serve for no more than 2 four-year terms. No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. Sharia Law A caliph must be a Muslim, a non -slave, a male, of the Quraysh tribe, etc. (025.0) The Caliph appoints a group to select his successor among themselves. There is no a term of office. However, the caliphate of someone who seizes power is considered valid, even though his act of usurpation is disobedience, in view of the danger from anarchy and strife that would otherwise ensue. (o25.4(3)) REMOVAL OF GOVERNMENT OFFICERS US Constitution Section 4 — The President and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from office if found guilty of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Sharia Law (No provision for removal from office.) LEGAL AUTHORITY US Constitution Article VI — This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made under it shall be the supreme law of the land, and judges in every state shall be bound by them. Senators and Representatives, legislative officers, all executive and judicial officers both of the United States and the several states shall be bound by a Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution. Sharia Law The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah_ (a1.1) CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS RIGHTS US Constitution Amendment 1— Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances. Sharia Law Non -Muslims are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. Non -Muslims are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures, or make a public display of feast days or funerals. Non -Muslims are forbidden to build new churches. A non -Muslim may not enter a mosque without permission. a protection for non -Muslims is withdrawn if a non - Muslim commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her, leads a Muslim away from Islam, kills a Muslim, or says anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam. (o11.5 through 011.10) - US Constitution Amendment 2 — The right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Sharia Law It is a condition that someone buying weapons be of a people who are not at war with Muslims. (k1.2(f)) Enormities (sins) include selling weapons to non -Muslims who will use thein against us. (w52.1(192)) US Constitution Amendment 3 -- No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner prescribed by law. Sharia Law (Not covered.) However, the Pact of Omar (636 AD) imposed on Christians in Syria, "We shall keep our gates wide open for passersby and travelers. We shall give board and lodging to all Muslims who pass our way for three days." US Constitution Amendments 4 — 8 — These amendments prohibit unreasonable searches, require due process according to the law, provide for confrontation of witnesses, impose jury trial on all matters involving over $20, and prohibit excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments. Amendment 14 provides for equal protection of the laws for all citizens. Sharia Law No testimony may be made by people who have lowly jobs, such as a street sweeper or a bath house attendant, or non -Muslim. (o24.2-3) Testimony regarding fornication or sodomy requires four male eye -witnesses to the act. (o24.9) A woman's testimony is worth only half that of a man. (o24.10) (There is no provision for a jury trial under Sharia Law.) Cruel and unusual Islamic punishments include 1) stoning for adultery (012.2); 2) scourging 40 lashes with hands, shoes, ends of clothes, or a whip for drunkenness (o16.3); 3) severing the right hand for theft of over $36 and the left foot for a repeat offense (o14.1); and 4) death for apostasy from Islam. (o8.2) Indemnity for accidentally killing a male Muslim is 100 camels or 4,235 grams of gold. (Current value: $144,000.) Indemnity for killing a woman is half that of a man, for killing a Jew or a Christian is one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a killing Zoroastrian is one -fifteenth of that of a Muslim. The indemnity for causing a miscarriage is one slave. (o4.9) There is no indemnity for a killing a non -Muslim at war with Muslims, an apostate, or someone sentenced to death by stoning. (014.17) Jews and C ristians are subject to a " oll ax" not less than 1 dinar (Current value: $144) ' per adult mak per year. No maximum is stipulated. (o11.4) This is a penalty for remaining in their ancestral religion instead of embracing the "religion of truth." (o9.8) A husband may beat a "rebellious" wife for 1) not allowing immediate sexual intercourse when he asks for it, at home, and if she can physically endure it; 2) answering him coldly; or 3) being averse when she was previously kind_ (m5.1 and m 10.12) The only limitation is that he may not break her bones, wound her, or cause bleeding. US Constitution Amendment 13 Slavery and involuntary servitude are abolished. Sharia Law The section on Slavery (k32.0) is not translated into English. The provisions remain in Arabic. The editor of "The Reliance of the Traveler" claims that these provisions are no longer applicable, yet they remain in there in the text of Sharia Law. Elsewhere, the manual states, "Originally the status of slave was simply the outcome of having been taken as a prisoner of war. A captive who could not buy his own freedom by means of ransom retrained in the possession of the captor until he had earned his freedom by work or until he was granted liberty by his master." (w13.1) US Constitution Amendment 21 repealed "prohibition," thereby allowing manufacture, sale, and transport of alcoholic beverages. Sharia Law It is unlawful to sell grapes to someone who will make wine from them. (k4.9) "Allah cursed w never drinks wine, gives it to others to drink, sells it, buys it, presses it for another, transports it, receives it, or eats its price." Enormities (sins) include drinking wine in any form or other intoxicant, even if only a drop as in medicine; pressing out the juice to make wine or other intoxicant; carrying it for purposes of drinking, or having it carried; serving it to others or having it served; selling it; buying it; having it bought or sold; consuming proceeds from selling it; or keeping wine or other intoxicant. (o16.6 and w52.1(350-361)) ID CARDS FOR BRITIAN Wil! Boost National Security My fellow Americans, the next time someone says we need to be more tolerant, more understanding, more accepting of Islam and Sharia Law, ask them, "What art{s) of the Constitution are you willing to abandon in order to accommodate Sharia Law?" Then do not say a word. lie/she that speaks first loses. If they try to wander off course, change the subject or insult you, simply restate the question and wait. This is too important a fight to just walk away. Bill Turner Assistant National Coordinator The Patriotic Resistance US Western Regional Coordinator Modern Conservative/Anystreet.org 4vww.anvstreet.org Co-Founder/Senior Advisor The American Patriot Commission www.ainericannatriotcommission.com Blog: www.americanpatriotscommission,com Twitter: Czarhunter Report government corruption and abuse: press,,(americanpatriotcormission.co€n Last Updated: Friday, 5 January 2007, 18:17 GMT E-mail this to a friend Printable version Italy to monitor mosque funding By Christian Fraser BBC News, Rome Italy's interior minister said Islamic schools would also be monitored The Italian government plans to introuce strict checks ori the sources of foreign money used to build mosques in the country. Italy's interior minister is considering setting up a foundation which would monitor foreign funding for religious buildings and mosques. A similar system already exists in France. Italy now has 1.2 million Muslims, making Islam the country's second biggest religion after Catholicism. Giving alms is a religious obligation in Islam. But some foreign charities distributing funds in Europe have been accused of supporting extremist groups. It will help to protect the law-abiding majority Yahya Pallavicin Italian Islamic council Italian Interior Minister Giuliano Amato says he has little control over charitable money corning into the country, especially from foreign governments, who are helping to fund the building of mosques. "There's something I don't like about it," he said. "In the future, I want to understand who is financing what." He is advocating a foundation to monitor funding, based on the French model, within which the government would have some say. Muslim welcome Mr Amato, like his predecessor, wants to limit the influence of foreign Islamic oto s that he believes are trying to get a foothold in Italy through fringe organisations. The minister has promised that Islamic schools will also be more closely monitored than they were in the past to make sure they respect national standards, especially where teachers are concerned. The proposals have so far won cautious support from leading Muslims in the country. Yahya Pallavicini, one of the 16 members of Italy's Islamic council, set up to advise the government, said he welcomed the move. "It will help to protect the law-abiding majority," he said. "If everything is handled transparently, then there is no space left for ambiguous or hidden funding by these ideological organisations." Islam in Action Islam in Action is a site dedicated to exposing the worldwide issue of Islamofascisrn. The owner of this site is not calling for any violence or harassment of Muslims. He is looking for political solutions. One being putting a moratorium on Muslim immigration. Wednesday, August 27, 2008 Italy Proposes Bill to end all Mosque Construction Italy, the worlds leader in the fi _ht against Islam attempts to take it up a note an put a ban on Mosque construction. If this passes look for a call to end all Mosque construction to spread across Europe. As the Swiss have already looked to put an end to the Islamic calls to prayers being broadcast in their country. Muslims across the world use our freedoms against us in order to impose Islam on us. To fight back we are going to have to bend our constitutions and treat Islam unlike other religions, as it is a political movement as well as a religion. Either that or Muslims will eventually dominate us. Take your pick. Italy's Northern League seeks to block new mosques By Paul Bompard in Rome Published: August 25 2008 03:00 1 Last updated: August 25 2008 03:00 Italy's Northern League, the populist, xenophobic, sometimes separatist movement that is a key component of Silvio Berlusconi's governing coalition, has proposed new legislation which would in effect halt construction of new Islamic mosques. The bill, which the League's chief of deputies Roberto Cota is expected to send to parliament next week, would require regional approval for the building of mosques. It would also require that a local referendum be held, that there be no minaret or loudspeakers calling the faithful to prayer, and sermons must be in Italian, not Arabic. Chances of this being approved as it stands are slim, since it clashes with a number of constitutional rights and there was no immediate support from either Berlusconi's Forza Italia party or from the exfascist National Alliance. But there has been cautious support from the small, ultra -Catholic UDC party, and the proposed anti -mosque legislation undoubtedly reflects widespread feeling among Italians that some defence against a rapidly rising Islamic presence is needed. At present, the Muslim population in Italy is estimated at 1 na, with 258 registered mosques. The Northern League, which theoretically favours the secession of northern Italy from the centre and south, won more than 8 per cent of the vote at the April general elections, and has always trumpeted defence of national values of the northern Italian "race" as the natural product of its homeland. Without giving details, Roberto Maroni, the rightwing interior minister from the League, also said in April that "nomads" - as Italians call the Gypsies, although most do little roaming - who were not Italian citizens and did not meet conditions to stay would be deported to their "countries of origin". The League has capitalised on a wave of xenophobia, of fear of crime committed by foreigners, and of preoccupation with illegal immigrants, which did much to help the Berlusconi alliance win the elections. Link to Article Posted by Christopher Logan at 3:18 AM 11 comments: Anonymous said... The Northern League is Europe's finest political party. Not only is it good for Italy, it is also a beacon of hope to other European countries. One day our nations will need to implement such policies. All people are NOT the same. All religions are NOT equal. Identity is NOT negotiable. Muslims will never be Europeans. Islam is an abberation and should be removed from European soil. August 27, 2008 10:19 AM Christopher Logan said... If not stopped Islam will destroy Europe and the United States. August 27, 2008 10:21 AM Anonymous said... Considering what many feel is the insidious nature of Islam, such reprisal type reactions should be expected. Few, in America, Europe, or elsewhere, want their national identities abolished or obscured by an identity that demands all others submit to its religious & political nature. In America, separation of church & state is the norm, even though some would try to assert Christians are running the show. No matter because the real facts are, religious leaders do not dictate political policy in America. And this is also why we can never allow our constitution to be watered down by those who seek a living or breathing document. If we have nothing in writing to adhere to or to lead us r count on, why have the documents at all & why have a system at all? August 27, 2008 2:11 PM Anonymous said... Muslims have been trying to overturn the U.S. Constitution and impose. sharia law in America as well. We all need to fight back ASAP. The Truth About Islam August 27, 2008 7:23 PM Anonymous said... Gread article! Great comments ---nothing to add but: BRAVO!! August 27, 2008 11:06 PM Anonymous said... Italy Proposes a Bill to end all Mosque construction,that is a good start for Italy. The only solution is to stop them being built, and to demolish what is up. This will be done in the end, it will have to be, as it is the ONLY way forward. These places are a smokescreen for terrorists, and need getting rid of, ASAP. I wholeheartedly agree. c Controversy Surrounds Construction of Mosques Across U.S, By Lauren Green Published July 02, 2010 1 FoxNews.com They're separated by thousands of miles, but they share a common controversy: Mosques. Murfreesboro, Tenn., has joined a growing list of midsized towns in the U.S. that are embroiled in conflicts over proposed mosques being built or bought in their neighborhoods. Including Murfreesboro, residents have risen up against mosques in two other Tennessee towns; in Staten Island, N.Y.; Sheboygan County, Wis.; and the Sheepshead Bay neighborhood of Brooklyn, as well as the proposed mosque and Islamic Cultural Center near Ground Zero, which has garnered some of the most heated battles. A new Quinnipiac Poll shows that well over half of New Yorkers -- 52 percent oppose building a mosque near the 9/11 site. Only 31 percent support it. Among ethnic groups, Hispanics show the greatest opposition to the Ground Zero mosque, 60 to 19 percent. Among religious groups, Jews and white Catholics expressed the greatest opposition, both at 66 percent. Those who support building the mosques say the opposition comes from growing Islamophobia, racism and ignorance. Those who oppose adamantly deny that bigotry is involved. In Murfreesboro, Republican congressional candidate Lou Ann Zelenik says she's not against the building of a mosque, but she does oppose the construction of an Islamic cultural center, which she says would be an Islamic training facility. "This has nothing to do with religion, but everything to do with a radical agenda," she says. But in Staten Island, fears that a mosque will become a breeding ground for homegrown terror are rooted in reports about who's financing the deal. .----- Residents of the heavily Catholic neighborhood are in an uproar over a Muslim group's plans to buy a shuttered convent and convert it into a Mosque. Besides concerns about increased traffic and little parking, there are disturbing reports surrounding the organization, the Muslim America Society, which is funding the purchase. According to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, MAS has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, a 1 4-year-ol movement t at is widely regarded as one of the most influential Islamic fundamentalist groups in the world. Its stated agenda has been to spread Islam and Shariah law throughout the West. Some of its members also reportedly created Hamas. "The Muslim American Society was created in the early 1990s as the de facto arm of the Muslim Brotherhood," says Steve Emerson, IPT's executive direc or. He says the MAS and Muslim Brotherhood claim to oppose terrorism, but "behind closed doors they support terrorism and have defended various terrorists that have been convicted in the United States since 9/11." But Ibrahim Ramey, the human and civil rights director for MAS Freedom, adamantly denies any connection to the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas or terrorism. "There are people who don't like Muslims and don't like Muslims in their neighborhood who have been vociferously and consistently trying to link MAS with foreign organizations and movements, but that simply isn't true," Ramey says. "We are not agents of Hamas nor do we answer to them, nor do we provide money for them, nor are we part of any conflict that they have with the U.S. Government, or any authorities in the United States." Emerson says his group has documentation linking MAS with the Muslim Brotherhood. He also says MAS has been on a spending spree in the last two years, either buying property to establish mosques, as in Staten Island, or taking over existing mosques, like the huge Dal al-Hidrah in Northern Virginia and the very prominent Islamic Society of Boston in Massachusetts. "The way to gain influence among the Muslim community is to control the mosques," Emerson says. "The way to control what people think in the Muslim community is to have the right imam preach the right message. So by acquiring these mosques the Muslim American Society gets the right to appoint the imam and distribute the message they believe is necessary to spread Islam around the world." Ramey says the Muslim community simply is growing and needs more space. "Our interest in establishing mosques," he says, "is simply to provide for members of the organization and members of the larger Muslim community." "The allegations that MAS is somehow pushing for the implementation of Shariah laws is an absolute lie. It is not founded in fact. It is not part of our agenda." He says open dialogue is the key to quelling any fears a community may have about mosques. But for Zelenik, dialogue doesn't seem to be in the near future. She says she's received threats for her comments, but she won't back down_ She vows to continue fighting against the mosque in Murfreesboro. "We are focusing on the positive," she says. "We are not going to let threats stop us for one moment, have not and will not." Muslim cleric calls for 'Greater Iran' By ASSOCIATED PRESS 15/05/2010 16:39 SisieI�lzirlitiunion _dszmet .h from A p3anStawto Israel. l. TEIRAlN, Iran — A radical cleric, called Saturday for the creation of a "Greater Iran" that would rule over the entire Middle East and Central Asia, in an event that he said would herald the corning of Islam's expected messiah. Ayatollah Mohammad Bagher Kharrazi said the creation of what he termed an Islamic United States is a central aim of the political party he leads - called Hizbullah, or Party of God. He added that he hoped to make his vision a reality if the party won the next presidential election. a a Kharrazi's comments revealed the thinking of a growing number of hard- liners in Iran, many of whom have become more radical during the postelection political crisis and the international standoff over the country's nuclear program. Kharrazi, however, is not highly influential in Iran's clerical hierarchy and his views do not represent those of the current government. Kharrazi's comments were published Saturday in his newspaper, Hizbullah. He said he envisioned a Greater Iran that would stretch from Afghanistan to Israel, bringing about the destruction of the Jewish state. He also said its formation would be a prelude to the reappearance of the Mandi, a revered ninth -century saint known as the Hidden Imam, whom Muslims believe will reappear before judgment day to end tyranny and promote justice in the world. 1r "The Islamic. United States will be an introduction to the formation of the global village of the oppressed and that will be a prelude to the single global rile of the Mandi," the newspaper quoted him as saying. Besides Israel, he said the union would also destroy Shi'ite Iran's other regional adversaries, whom he called "cancerous tumors." He singled out secular Arab nationalists such as members of Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath Party in Iraq, as well as followers of the austere version of Sunni Islam practiced pprimarily in Saudi Arabia that is known as Wahabism. Sandi Arabia and otherSunni Arab nations have watched Iran's growing regional clout with deep concern. The growing voice of hard-liners like Kharrazi has deepened worries even if it appears unlikely such a divisive figure would win the 2013 presidential election. Still, even Iranian President Mahrn.oud Ahmadinejad said on Thursday that he expects the government which follows his to be "ten times more revolutionary." Into the jaws of hate: Soldiers' parade marred by Muslim extremists and far -Right By Andrew Levy Last updated at 12:40 AM on 16th June 2010 Screaming hate and brandishing vile placards, Muslim extremists and far - Right groups clashed yesterday in ugly scenes that marred a parade by soldiers. Around 40 members of a group called Muslims Against the Crusades (MAC) arrived with inflammatory banners featuring slogans such as 'Butchers return' and 'What are you dying for? £18k'. They were soon confronted by 100 people, some wearing English Defence League T-shirts, who shouted 'scum' and 'Muslim bombers off our streets'. Clashes: Police hold back Muslim protesters as they trade insults with English Defence League members while soldiers take part in a homecoming parade in Barking, Essex The Muslim protesters shouted 'murderers' as troops from the Royal Anglian Regiment paraded through Barking Police, who had received intelligence warning of trouble at the march in Barking, Essex, separated the groups behind barriers on opposite sides of the road. But violence flared after 200 soldiers from 1st Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment - who lost five men in a recent tour of Afghanistan and had been granted freedom of the borough - marched past thousands of well-wishers. MAC supporters shouted slogans such as 'murderers, murderers' and 'British troops go to hell', while the mainly white crowd opposite, some of whom are believed to have been BNP supporters, threw frozen pork sausages and chanted 'scum' and 'Allah, Allah, who the f* * * is Allah?' The anti -MAC contingent then stormed the barriers and traded punches before around 100 officers, including some on horseback, broke up the mob. The clashes carne little over a year after Muslim extremists screamed 'baby killers' and 'rapists' at soldiers from 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment parading through Luton after a tour of duty in Iraq. Members of the public who travelled to Barking yesterday to cheer the troops said they were 'disgusted' by what happened. Police lead away the protesters from the Muslim Against the Crusade Group as they face jeers from English Defence League members The homecoming ceremony was delayed by an hour after far right protesters hurled frozen sausages at the Muslim group Charlene Byrne, 24, whose boyfriend Lance Corporal Scott Hardy was killed in an explosion near Musa Qala on March 16, said: 'They should never have been allowed to hijack this. Not everyone supports what's happening in Afghanistan - but they shouldn't take it out on the soldiers.' Alex Mitchelson, 18, whose brother has completed two tours of Afghanistan, said: 'He would been disgusted by what happened here today. i had Muslim protesters racially abusing me as 1 walked by.' The leader of Barking and Dagenham Council recently wrote to Home Secretary Theresa May asking her to ban MAC because he feared its extremist propaganda could cause violence. Seven protesters charged over anti -Army demo refuse to stand for judge in court Last updated at 12:09 AM on 5th January 2010 Seven Muslim protesters accused of screaming insults at soldiers during an Iraq homecoming parade refused to stand for a judge yesterday. The men are alleged to have shouted 'murderers', 'rapists', 'terrorists' and 'baby killers' while waving placards at the 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment marching through Luton. At the town's magistrates' court, they denied using threatening, abusive, insulting words and behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others. Protesters: (from left to right) Jabair Ahmed, Shajjadar Choudhury, Ziaur Rahman, Jalal Ahmed, Munim Abdul and Yousaf Bashir arrive at Luton Magistrates' Court After refusing to stand they were threatened with being found in contempt of court by a clearly angry District Judge Carolyn Mellanby. They insisted it was a 'grave and cardinal sin' to show anyone other than Allah respect by standing. Eventually, a compromise was reached where they would enter the court after her during the trial, which is expected to last six days. The maximum penalty each of the men can receive is a £1,000 fine. Enlarge log t id i � f Itcsta court i ea ..to be a clfu is nt 4440 orfthe i to , rhks 0. , not to e o rate: uk se:rvien P t.e.:. judge h r fires= roast think tant€olfl sa d }There 1solin. is n sho l+d no.s. :iii.' u Eei t for tt# tt rit clf the st d u : to show mte Ori i court oda foraf eor^ .11 a r walk m� istra lbournet fir. oldtg defndhntsandsupo-trsr u i•�n andAl e uktt v h e > The defendants were given an extra 20 minutes on top of their lunch break to go to pray at a mosque a few minutes' walk away. A separate 'quiet' room has been set aside for their regular prayer intervals for the rest of the week. The seven accused men are Mullin Abdul, 28, Jalal Ahmed, 21, Jabair Ahmed, 19, Yousaf Bashir, 29, Shajjadar Choudhury, 31, Ziaur Rahman, 32, and white Muslim Ibrahim Anderson, 32, all from Luton. They are alleged to have chanted: 'British army murderers', 'British soldiers bum in hell' and 'Baby killers shame on you'. The Muslim protesters brandished banners calling British soldiers 'butchers' during the parade Trouble flared on March 10 last year as the regiment - known as the Poachers - marched to a meeting with the Duke of Gloucester, the regiment's colonel -in -chief, and local dignitaries in Luton town centre. They had just returned from a second tour of duty in Iraq, and had previously fought in Afghanistan. The battalion has lost 12 soldiers in both campaigns. The soldiers are based in Germany, but Bedfordshire is one of the regiment's main recruiting grounds. Avirup Chaudhuri, prosecuting, said a group of peaceful anti -war protesters arranged with the police that they would assemble at a specific point on the route, but a splinter group went elsewhere to voice dissent. Islamic Hat Allowed for Lawyer in Courtroom THE HAGUE, 12/12/09 - The appeals chamber of the Bar Association's disciplinary council has acquitted lawyer Mohammed Enait of contempt of court. He has the right not to rise when the judge enters the courtroom and can wear a Muslim hat during sessions, it ruled Friday. It is customary for lawyers to stand up during court cases when the judge enters the courtroom. Enait deliberately refuses to do so. His argument is that his religion maintains that everyone is equal and as a Muslim, he therefore does not want to behave subserviently. The disciplinary council of the Bar Association reprimanded the Islamic lawyer in May. On three points, he showed contempt of court, it ruled; he refuses to rise, wears an Islamic head -covering during sessions and showed contempt of a judge in a TV talkshow. But the appeal chamber acquitted the lawyer on all three counts Friday. His refusal to rise and his headgear are not meant to show contempt of court, I its view. And in the TV programme his relative lack of experience as a lawyer played a role. Enait appears regularly in talk -shows on TV. He is known for his complicated vocabulary, preferably using at least one difficult word in every sentence. The lawyer earlier became the focus of satire after it emerged that the secretaries portrayed on the website of his office were porn actresses. Enait refuses to shake hands with women. Woman gives evidence wearing niqab Friday, 04 September 2009 15:05 KR News .Female judge used to confirm identity of woman whose face was hidden behind traditional Muslim headscarf For the first time in Danish legal history, a woman has given evidence in a courtroom wearing a niqab, reports TV2 News. The woman was a witness during a High Court hearing on 7 August and was wearing the traditional Islamic headscarf that covers the face, leaving only the eyes visible. Judge Henrik Bitsch explained that the situation was resolved when the woman produced her driver's license as ID and then removed her face covering in front of a female judge to confirm her identity. Spokespeople for the government's Liberal party and their allies the Danish People's Party both said it was problematic that witness's faces were not visible during a hearing. Nasar Khader, integration spokesman for the government's Conservative Party which recently proposed a ban on bumps, stood by the party Iine and said courtrooms should be free of burgas and niqabs. 'But firstly I will hand it over to the judicial system to create rules that cover the niqab and burka,' said Khader. There are currently no set rules for what a witness can wear in a courtroom. It is at the discretion of the presiding judge to deem what is appropriate. It's again a victory for the muslim extremist and a defeat for the moderate muslims and another sign of weakness from Denmark. It will now be legal for bank robbers and similar felons to appear in court in their balaclavas. No? They are equally religious in their determination not to be seen and no less cynical about DK's culture of openness. And I bet this judge is very left wing politacaly oriented In 1940 some Danish collaborated with the na.zis....in 2009 some Danish are collaborating with the islamist. Three Arrested in Norway Ai Qaeda Bomb Piot C.BNNews.corn Thursday, July 08, Authorities in Norway say they have three suspected al Qaeda members in custody. The three men were arrested on suspicion of "preparing terror activities." They had been under surveillance by law enforcement officials for more than a year. Their names were not disclosed. Norweigan and U.S. officials said it was not clear the men had selected a target for the attacks, but believe the men were planning attacks with portable peroxide bombs, just like the ones at the heart of last year's thwarted attack in the New York City subway. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder called the New York subway bombing plot one of the most serious since the attacks of September 11, 2001. Jaime .Kristiansen, head of Norway's Police Security Service, said one of the men was a 39 -year-old Norwegian of Uighur origin, who had lived in Norway since 1999. The other suspects included a 37 -year-old Iraqi and a 31 -year-old citizen of Uzbekistan, both of whom have permanent residency permits in Norway. Al Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahri, has called for attacks on Norway among other countries. Magnus Norell, a terrorism expert at the Swedish Defense Research Agency, told the Associated Press that Norway's 500 troops in Afghanistan could be a factor, as could the 2006 controversy sparked by a Danish newspaper's publication of 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad. Norell said the controversy has extended to neighboring Norway and Sweden after newspapers there republished the cartoons and later published similar cartoons. Images of Muhammad, even favorable ones, are considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The Real Issue "but be transformed by the renewing of your mind" (Romans 12:2) and not the removal of your mind Equipping the Believer to Think and Challenging the Thinker to Believe Sunday, July 18, 2010Sunday Morning Quote — Sam Soloman on 'Compulsion in Religion' "When engaging Muslims in religious discussion, one usually hears that Islam is a religion of peace and there is "no compulsion in religion." This phrase, often quoted by Muslims, when freedom is discussed, is a convenient phrase but not the final word in the Qur'an by any means. The phrase "no compulsion in religion" comes from Sura 2:256 which gives the impression of complete freedom of choice for individuals within an Islamic or community. Note that "no compulsion" in religion is even at first glance a negative form of freedom, meaning at its best that it tolerates but does not grant the right of freedom for an individual to choose his or her own religion. If "no compulsion in religion" were to be practiced, then the preaching of the gospel would not be criminalized in Islamic states. Yet people are regularly deported from Islamic countries for giving a Bible to a Muslim, for discussing Christianity with an individual, or in some cases even possessing a Bible of their own." -- Sam Soloman, "Challenges from Islam" in Beyond Opinion: Living the Life We Defend (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2007): 71-72. Editor's Note: With all that is going with our colleagues with their Dearborn excursion, it is vitally important to know what the Muslim thinkin is when thecome to our coup . wi be addressing this in a future entry. This posting gives us a glimpse of that thinking in their own frame of reference. But when they come here, it is a totally different reference point that we need to defend. I ask him about the best strategy for fighting it: "It cannot be combated simply by force. It needs to be combated ideologically, spiritually (as well as) through arms." 4 Soloman says the outlets for Islamic ideology are religious - seminaries, the madrassas (Koranic schoo s) an especially e mosques. "From the beginning, Mohammed used the mosque to propagate this ideology. It was in the mosque that jihad was declared (and) that troops were sent to conquer the rest of the world. The mosque was the seat of government and Americans are right to be concerned about (their growth)." He asks Americans to inform themselves about the real teachings of Islam and not to all for what various Islamic ou • s sa it teaches. So oman says, "The simplest slamic book you open" teaches that all unbelievers (in Islam) are profane people. "Because of the (Koranic) text and what it says, it incites violence." He begins quoting verses from memory, too quickly to write them all down. One is, "Slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush." (Surah 9:5) "This kind of tactic of taking verses out of context can be used against any religious faith," says Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for Washington, D.C.- based Council on American -Islamic Relations, an Islamic civil rights and advocacy group. "It can and has been used against the Bible and has been used against the Quran." "These verses deal with the real experience of the Muslim community at the time when they were under attack. It's not a general injunction to go out and harm people. The only people who take it that way are those who want to promote hostility toward Islam and Muslims. They would object if the same thing were done to their faith." Yes, but virtually all Christians and Jews denounce the infinitesimal few who claim to be Jewish or Christian and use their "holy books" to justify violence against others as a direct command from God. Asked whether the Koran commands the killing of or violence against all nonbelievers, Ali Khan, national director of the Chicago -based American Muslim Council, replied: "No. (That's) far from the truth. There's nothing in the Koran, no verse that I'm aware of, that advocates the killing of nonbelievers." The terrorists and those who preach from mosques throughout the Middle East must be reading a different version, then, because virtually all of their sermons that I've read claim their God wants them to kill all "infidels." Soloman says Americans must demand from the leading Islamic hierarchy, such as the Muslim World League and the Union of Imams, a fatwa that makes it clear "that this isnot what the text means and that terse texts are no onger e ective. They have passed their date. But if they remain effective and eternally valid, then in America we have a serious pro em." How serious? He says "They are infiltrating and undermining every part of this society. We are promoting Islamic mortgages, Islamic insurance companies. There are 29 banks in the United States promoting Islamic banking. Since 1999, Dow Jones has launched Dow Jones Islamic Index and has subjected itself to be governed by an international Sharia board." (Sharia is the religious law of Islam outlined in the Koran. Soloman adds, "The Islamic organizations have their missionaries and there are active or sleeping cells in this country." He mentions one, Tablighi Jamaat, "a Pakistani organization that is hand -in -glove with the Wahaabis, strong Muslim sects known for their strict observance of the Koran, and a strong facilitator of al-Qaida and other factions of terrorism. They alone have 1,000 missionaries in New York, 50,000 across the United States. This is only one organization. In 1994, I took a map and started putting pins in it. I found there is not a single state without a mosque. Since then (the number) has increased." Americans must see past their natural reluctance to paint all members of a group with a broad brush and realize our failure to act now against this clear and present danger in the ways Sam Soloman recommends will leato a. disaster or us that is far worse than our Cold War enemies had envisaged. Trading cape for the burga Last Updated: 10:37 AM, October 11, 2010 tl Posted: 5:18 AM, October 11, 2010 Andrea Peyser Hide your face and grab the kids. Coming soon to a TV in your child's bedroom is a posse of righteous, Sharia-com +liant Muslim superheroes -- including one who fights crime idden head -to -toe by a burqa. These Islamic butt -kickers are ready to bring truth, justice and indoctrination to impressionable Western minds. Scheduled for release on the new network The Hub -- formerly Discovery Kids -- which launches today (Time Warner and DirecTV carry it in the city), is a cartoon beloved in the Arab world and received timidly in Britain last year, "The 99." ir f The program chronicles the adventures of 99 superheroes, each of whom embodies an attribute of Allah. Jabbar is a Muslim Incredible Hulk. Mumita is wicked fast. But Wonder Woman -style cleavage has been banned from the ladies. And, in this faith - based cartoon, hair -hiding head scarves are mandatory for five characters, not including burgs babe Batina the Hidden. In another break from standard world -saving fare, male and female 7\‘ characters are never alone together. (Imagine the stoning super -strong c aracters woul is out "The 99" even as the seal of approval of a Sharia board -- which polices Muslim law -- affiliated with an Islamic bank from which the show received financing. What a great time to come to the United States! No higher an authority than President Obamaraised the work_of the ccomic's creator, Kuwaiti psychologist Naif al-Mustawa. At an April meeting vvf Arab entrepreneurs, Obama said, "His su erheros embody the teachings of the tolerance of Islam" There was no stopping it. The Hub, a joint venture with Hasbrotoys, announced in May that it would produce and air episodes of "The 99." But then, murmurs of dissatisfaction turned into a cry. How can a secular nation endorse a children's show awned at pushing one religion? A Times of London columnist wrote last year that the show's mission was "to instill old-fashioned Islamic values in Christian, Jewish and atheist chiTdren." Then last month, the conservative Family Security Matters think tank published a piece titled "Meet the Muslim Superheroes Who Are Ready to Indoctrinate American Kids." Acknowledging Mustawa's efforts to bridge cultures, editor Adrian Morgan asked, "Are we going to see ass -kicking Christian superhero nuns called Faith, Hope and Charity whooping sinners' butts and sending Satan into hell? It's doubtful." The effect was quick. The debut of "The 99" has been pushed back at least until January, said a Hub source who asked not to be named. He blamed unspecified "production issues" for the delay. Trading cape for the burqa Last Updated: 1.0:37 AM, October 11, 2010 if Posted: 5:18 AM, October 11, 2010 Andrea Peyser Hide your face and grab the kids. Coming soon to a TV in your child's bedroom is a posse of righteous, Sharia-com pliant Muslim superheroes -- including one who fights crimehidden head -to -toe by a burqa. These Islamic butt -kickers are ready to bring truth, justice and indoctrination to impressionable Western minds. Scheduled for release on the new network The Hub -- formerly Discovery Kids -- which launches today (Time Warner and DirecTV carry it in the city), is a cartoon beloved in the Arab world and received timidly in Britain last year, "The 99." The program chronicles the adventures of 99 superheroes, each of whom embodies an attribute of Allah. Jabbar is a Muslim Incredible Hulk. Mumita is wicked fast. But Wonder Woman -style cleavage has been banned from the ladies. And, in this faith - based cartoon, hair -hiding head scarves are mandatory for five characters, not including burqa babe Batina the Hidden. In another break from standard world -saving fare, male and female characters are never alone together. (Imagine the stoning super -strong ar cacters woul is ut. "The 99" even as the seal of approval of a Sharia board -- which polices Muslim law -- affiliated with an Islamic bank from which the show received financing. What a great time to come to the United States! No higher an authority than President Obama raised the work of the comic's creator, Kuwaiti psychologist Naif al-Mustawa. At an April meeting with Arab entrepreneurs, Obama said, "His sou egrheroes embody the teachings of the tolerance of Islam." There was no stopping it. The Hub, a joint venture with Hasbro toys, announced in May that it would produce and air episodes of "The 99." But then, murmurs of dissatisfaction turned into a cry. How can a secular nation endorse a children's show aimed at pushing one religion? A Times of London columnist wrote last year that the show's mission was "to instill old-fashioned Islamic values in Christian, Jewish and atheist cfildren." Then last month, the conservative Family Security Matters think tank published a piece titled "Meet the Muslim Superheroes Who Are Ready to Indoctrinate American Kids." Acknowledging Mustawa's efforts to bridge cultures, editor Adrian Morgan asked, "Are we going to see ass -kicking Christian superhero nuns called Faith, Hope and Charity whooping sinners' butts and sending Satan into hell? Ifs doubtful." The effect was quick. The debut of "The 99" has been pushed back at least until January, said a Hub source who asked not to be named. He blamed unspecified "production issues" for the delay. Terror threat to restaurants as Al Qaeda calls for attacks on government workers in D.C. BY James Gordon Meek DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU Monday, October 1 l th 2010, 8:34 PM D.C.'s busy bars, restaurants and lunchtime hangout spots could be the next terror targets as wannabe jihadis seek to kill U.S. government workers. Do you worry that terrorists could target restaurants in New York City? Yes, if they could do it in D.C., they could do it here. No, they would have done it by now if they could. We can't live in fear either way. - The terror group tied to the Ft. Hood killings and the Christmas Day undies airbomber urge wannabe American jihadis to open fire on crowded restaurants in the nation's capital to massacre U.S. government workers. The advice appears in "Inspire," the latest issue of a slick propaganda publication by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Osama Bin Laden's franchise in Yemen. "A random hit at a crowded restaurant in Washington, D.C., at lunch hour might end up knocking out a few government employees," Yahya Ibrahim writes in the 74 -page jihadi how-to magazine. "Targeting such employees is paramount and the location would also give the operation additional media attention," Ibrahim added. Other trash talk came from "Samir Khan," an American who came to AQAP from North Carolina, who produces the publication and wrote that he is "proud to be a traitor in America's eyes." "This guy is bad news, and given the fact that he helps publish AQAP trash, he certainly spreads a lot of it around, too," said a senior U.S. official. According to a copy of the magazine obtained by the SITE intelligence group, AQAP also urged those bent on murdering for Islam to use everything from pickup trucks to improvised pressure -cooker bombs to kill. The trucks can be fashioned into "the ultimate mowing machine," with steel blades welded to the grill to "mow down the enemies of Allah" by running down Americans on crowded sidewalks "to achieve maximum carnage" in a "martyrdom operation." "This method has not been used before," advises AQAP in its "Tips for our brothers in the U.S." Ibrahim praised the killings of a dozen victims at the U.S. Army post in Texas allegedly committed by accused homegrown terrorist Maj. Nidal Hasan, who was in contact with and inspired by U.S.-born AQAP cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. In 1993, Pakistani killer Mir Aimal Kasi opened fire on CIA employees at a stoplight, who were targeted because their cars were in a turn lane for the agency's Virginia headquarters. Experiences with Muslims lead to distrust Is Islam a religion or a fanatical group of Muslims who are waging a jihad to eliminate Christianity? In 1984, when I entered Al Khubar, Saudi Arabia, all Christian artifacts that I brought into the country were seized and destroyed, including my Bible, which I watched being shredded by a paper cutter. During my year at the Saudi Naval Base in Al jubayl, I saw many instances where anything relating to Christianity was forbidden.In December 1984, the Saudi minister of information issued an order that no Christian activities were to be_ observed by any person or. groups. By building mosques, the Muslims have a legal refuge to train and planter- rorist attacks. We read about attacks all over the world by Muslims against all peoples, even them- selves. hem-selves. Should we allow mosques to be built, then we are letting ourselves in for terrorist attacks which will be far greater than 9/11. I do not wish to con- demn all Muslims; it is just that my experience with them is that I, for one, do not trust them. I did not spend 22 years in the Marine Corps defending theUSA to have these radicals come here and destroy it. DAN MILLER Sun City The Temecula City Planning Commission Dear Sirs, I am a tax -paying, home -owning citizen of Temecula for over 6 years. I was born in California a enjoy this fair city, its churches & parks. However, I must tell you, I am not happy about the planning of a Mosque here. When I see that a Muslim man will cut the nose off his wife's face because she displeases him, I become angry that a Mosque here is even under consideration. The laws that they have to rule over all parts of their lives, this Sharia Law, seems totally opposite of what we, as Americans, have come to be comfortable with. I'm afraid our freedoms are at stake with this kind of a neighbor. I'm of the mindset that they want the whole world to be Muslim and want to take over. They believe people must convert or be killed. A little radical for Temecula, don't you think? I urge you, I plead with you, I beg you to not allow this "church" or "religion" or whatever you want to call it to build here in Temecula. Let no roots be dug in America for Islam to grow here. This land is our land and they are invaders. Respectfully, C•. nie'P.ower Cc : Council From: Pegs[mailto:onelordwonforever@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 4:11 PM To: Jeff Comerchero; Ron Roberts; Maryann Edwards; Mike Nagger; Chuck Washingto Subject: Dear City Council Planning Members, Hello Council Planning Members and my neighbors, My name is Peggy Palmer and I want my voice to be heard about a decision being made to build a Mosque in Temecula. Please know that none of you are not needing to determine whether or not you are discriminating against a religion, for Muslims are more over a political entity and violent culture, housed under the cloak of a religion. Catholicism is a religion with many factions, but those separations of theology do not try to kill one another, nor do they do harm to other faiths or try to change the law of the land. Instead, they read in the bible that you give unto Cesar that which is Caesar's. Perhaps in years gone by one can point to the Crusades, but those were over before the founding of the United States of America. Unfortunately CONQUERING the world is still the agenda at hand for Muslims of all sects. Their Methodology is one family, one city, one Mosque and one country at a time. Just look at their own personal form of conquering history from 600 AD until now, New York and consider Oklahoma. Muslims honor ONLY their own laws and mainly Sharia Law and they put up with ours ONLY UNTIL they get enough population to use their weight to change the law of the land. Buddhists don't have separate laws that govern them versus everyone else, rather those are their MORAL LAWS held in their personal worship. Look at Mormons and Polygamy, that's not tolerated here in the US either, so why should Muslims get to change the laws that have governed this land for close to 300 years? A Muslim's job, RADICAL or Otherwise is to change every country they infiltrate. Their Political and religious agenda is to use "RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION" against us. However the Constitution says there is to be political separation of Church and State. However, it seems that Church and State for our government is excluding Christians and including and making exclusive the rights of Muslims. Simply look at Oklahoma and realize that 70% of the VOTERS Said NO! "NO" to Not allowing two sets of different laws to be used, one over Muslims for muslims and one for every other citizen or non. Now that is Discrimination, that is BLATANT Discrimination. Imagine that we have political moron judges, city and state PUBLIC OFFICIALS being controlled by socialists with no Constitutional Backbone, who will stand up against the Anti-American and Sosoreos backed ACLU. Instead these impotent sitting ducks have fallen for the rhetoric of tolerance. Every day I drive down Winchester Road I see a sign that states "WE Do NOT TOLERATE CHILD ABUSERS" so why would you or any American, tolerate a group of people who claim to be friendly but want their own laws? Our's are good enough for them? They are for Christians, Buddhists and others who reside in peace and use their VOTE to count for their voice. But Muslim's they use the ACLU to BURDEN FINANCIALLY the entity they want to change. Does that bother anyone? Do you support the ACLU? NOT IF YOU ARE AMERICAN PATRIOTS YOU DON'T! Muslims do not and will not honor your wishes for long, regarding the same laws being good for them, as they are for Muslims, because they recognize no law but their own. They honor no flag or country only Mecca. And let me ask this, "How would you like your police officers to pull over a masked ? Because you have no idea if it's a man or a woman under that garb? In Minnesota they are fighting, if not already won the right to wear a face covering when getting their drivers licenses. So, how do you know who and what your officers are meeting? Is it a bomber disguised as a woman or just a woman who is a martyr, for Allah, or maybe just a person covering their face? You wouldn't let me do it or Christians do it, so why allow the start of a cancer you can't control? I hear good American's tell me; OH that can't be true, the Constitution will protect us! Really? So far the militant left wing seems to be destroying one amendment after another. I wonder or you would feel if you were Arizona and you wanted to protect your citizens and your boarders? Well let the Muslims get a toe hold here and you will be another DEARBORN MICHIGAN. Let them get a toe hold here and you will be another casualty like Oklahoma and Ground Zero. I am already going to leave California because the people here are to stupid to understand what illegal immigration has done. We used to be 6th in the nation for education and employment. Now we are becoming another Detroit Ghost town and the only people who will be here to pay the TAX are those 2million 6hundred thousand illegals who collect $570 million in program relief. Anyway, I have two Muslim friends. They are wonderful people, but neither are Mosque attenders and for good reason. they love freedom of choice. They love this country and came here to find a life. They do not voice their religious voice except to me and it's more of an upbringing tradition than their religion. But do I really trust them? NOPE! Why? Because if they really do what the Quran says; they will lie and it's justified, in order to infiltrate and according to the Quran Muslims can NEVER REALLY BEFRIENDS with an infidel. Please pray and take heed for you are cutting your noses and maybe your heads off to spite your political faces. Muslims are a POLITICAL CULTURE and every place they have gone and conquered they have destroyed the civilization they infiltrated. Are you going to let them destroy Temecula and California? Sincerely, Peggy Palmer Note: Duplicate letter was sent to all four remaining Planning Commissioners 11/09/2010 City of Temecula 42300 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Carl R. Carey, Chairman Planning Commission I respectfully request that you do not approve the building of a mosque in your city. Islam uses their mosques as a center to generate radical and dangerous behaviors from jihadist Muslims and to foment their goals of implementing sharia law throughout the US and the World. A mosque is also a monument to their goals of conquest and supremacy. The building of this mosque is the beginning of escalating demands you will be facing in the future. Gerald J. • ug d) 29821 N Lower Valley Rd., Tehachapi, CA 93561 661-821-5638 CC Pat Knight, Vice Chairman. Planning commission Stanley A. Harter, Commissioner. Planning Commission John H. Telesio, Commissioner, Planning Commission Ron Guerriero, Commissioner. Planning Commission Nov 10 10 07:31p Note: Duplicate letter was sent to all four remaining Planning Commissioners November 9, 2010 Temecula Planning Commission City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Carl R. Carey, Planning Commissioner Dear Mr. Carey p.1 We are writing this letter because we have a great deal of concern for the People of Temecula and their safety, peace of mind, their property Values, and wells -being. The United States of America has a Constitution and we are a nation of Laws, laws to that Constitution and not under Sharia law. Islam has a goal of turning this country into a country of and under Sharia Law which is contrary to our Constitution and laws. Islam is "NOT' a religion, it is a `=political ideology" and they axe using our Laws and our Jeudeo-Christian religion and turning it on us and using it Against us. Recently just this past week the people of Oklahoma voted down a ballot Measure that would have, should it have passed put Sharia Law in Oklahoma Into action, that would have had disasterous results. Fortunately the people Of Oklahoma turned it down by overwhelming votes. This planned Mosques is not about religion, it is not like staving a church Move into the neighborhood. This Mosque will bring the property values Down and they are already devastated by the recession this will only make Matters worse, not to mention at dawn from the minaret the call to worship 5 times a day, And prayer for a 120 Muslims, which not all will be allowed Worship (i.e women and children) at the crack of dawn the call echoing all Across the neighborhood. 1 can't have a rooster in my backyard because of It crowing at dawn I surely do not want a minaret echoing in Arabic the call To worship. This is America, not Sandia Arabia where there they do not allow Christian Church's nor do they even allow praying to Jehovah God, and possession of a Bible can land you in prison or even death. Now who holds the title to the property, does anyone know? Is it a front For laundering money for a terrorist group, or starting a training camp In the hills of Temecula. These are not idle words here, they have a goal And that goal is to destroy this country period. You know that recently things Have been heightened because of terrorist concerns, fortunately intelligence Have prevented another disaster, do we want that on our back door? If they read and believe the Quran then they are not moderate Muslims, a Mus - Lim is a Muslim thru and thru. If the call goes out that the Madhi has returned All Muslims are required to pickup sword and kill the infidels. Guess what Nov 10 10 07:31p p.2 That is you and me. There is NO such thing as a moderate Muslim After 9111 I myself gave information on a neighbor who was anti -Israel, a Staunch anti -Israel pro -PLO Hamas supporter, and t gathered all the Information I could off the internet on this person and took it to the FBI and they kept him and his two sons, who buy the wav went to UCI on taxpayer funds, he racked up a Is', 2"°, 3Cd; and 4t' mortgage On his home, maxed his credit cards out and trashed his home and Split the country leaving all of us to foot the bill. He and his wife Both stood and looked me in the eye and Iied to my face over and Over again. In Communism the ends justify the means, well it Means whatever they want it to in Islam. I truly implore you to consider the fact that if you go along with this Plan to build this Mosque here in Temecula you will regret it in The months and years to come, and say why did I do that. Our missionaries, our Christian brother's and sister's around the World is Muslim countries are being slaughtered, their homes des- Troyed, their church's burned to the ground and they treat Jews and Christians like dirt and then they come here and want to build a Mosque so they can show they have used our laws and religion to Basically stick it in our face. We are asking for you to truly take a look at what this would mean To the community at large. You are elected not just for a few but For the community as a whole, please spend time praying about This and seeking counsel as well and remember the people of Temecula before you decide to allow this to go forward. Thank you For your time, I know that this must weigh heavy on you but do The right thing, Mr..and Mrs. Fraj.k Seres �,: ,. r`. . .• • Cc: Pat Knight, Vice Chairman Stanley Harter, Commissioner John Telesio, Commissioner Ron Geurriero, Commissioner f'..,.!" Mayor. Jeff Comerchero Ron Roberts, Mayor-ProTem Maryann Edwards, Council Member Michael Nager, Council Member Note: Duplicate letter was sent to all four remaining Planning Commissioners James E. (Jim) Horn P.O. Box 2335 Menifee, CA 92586 951-551-3722 Carl R. Carey, Chairman Planning Commission 42300 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT=. Plans for M,que Dear Mr. Carey, " I am one of many who stand in opposition to the planned mosque in Temecula. While I don't live in Temecula, I work in, conduct my business in, and shop in Temecula, spending the majority of my awake hours in Temecula. I have encouraged others who share my intellect and clear understanding about what Islam's encroachment truly forbears for our great nation to stand up against the mosque. They are all people of great character and courage who deserve your attention. I have lived in Moslem dominated countries (Turkey, Algeria, Bangladesh) for more than a decade. Not a Moslem, I was often treated as a second class citizen, in accordance with Islamic laws, rules, and tradition. I have visited Mosques where I was treated with cordiality in accord with Moslem religious tradition. Having also traveled to and within many of these Islamic countries (Morocco, Libya, Egypt, the Sudan, Eritrea, Jordan; Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Muscat and Oman, Qatar, and points East), ,1 am acutely aware of historical truths and facts about the non -religious; the political, the militaristic, the social, the financial, and other non -religious sides of Islam, which in fact and practice comprise 90% of Islam. They are not about kumbayah sweetness and love. In my own personal experience, I have been spit upon, slapped, and been the victim of an attempted murder just because I was an infidel not bowing, scraping and showing enough `respect` to my Moslem societal superior; I have witnessed wanton murder (brutal, slow, tortuous slaughter) of innocent non -Moslems just because they weren't Moslem, and have heart countless stories from others about the rapaciousness of Islam. If you have learned any history, you would know that every Christian, Jew, and pagan of the area known as Saudi Arabia was killed off or forcefully converted to Islam. Much of the rest of the near Middle East suffered the a similar fate. Egypt was Christian at the time of the Moslem movement into Egypt, where the greatest repository of literature at the time, in the libraries of Alexandria were desecrated, destroyed, and burned (reportedly, the fires lasted for six months) by the Islamist conquerors who didn't November 3, 2010 want that knowledge, science, and truths passed on to others. As Islam swept into Asia, more than fifty million (50,000,000) people were killed off in what was then Buddhist Afghanistan, Pakistan; and Hindu India. Non -Moslems were allowed to live on as second class dhimmis for two reasons: They paid hefty taxes (and bribes to stay alive) to their Moslem masters; and they had skills that their conquerors needed. (The Moslems who developed Algebra were forced converts to Islam.) I do understand that you and others feel under great pressure to capitulate to those who want to build the mosque. Just say yes, and it's done, and to hell with the people who know, who care. THE EASY WAY IS TO GIVE IN, to take another small step in the Islamification of America, of condemning future generations of Americans to hell on earth. Your grand children and their children will suffer greatly under Islam, guaranteed. Lawfare is a form of Islamic jihad legal warfare, suing anyone they can, anyone who disagrees with them and wants to resist their agenda. Some elected and appointed officials in Temecula have expressed a cop-out, indicating that they are afraid that if they deny the Islamic center, they will be sued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), CAIR, etc. Tell them that such a cop-out is NOT acceptable, that the city has an obligation to protect its citizens from the encroachment of political, cultural, militaristic Islam, etc. Cowards will duck and weave, and throw us, the citizens under the buss of their political expedience. All officials whether elected, appointed, or hireling have an inherent obligation to be cognizant of facts and implications involved with their duties. If they are unable to fully grasp these issues as they apply to the general welfare of the whole public (many of whom may be ignorant of facts and truths), said officials must step aside in favor of people capable of making courageous, wise, prudent determinations. If they are not, they need to learn or are incompetent and should be removed. [For example, Mayor Bloomberg of New York who has come out in favor of the mosque at ground zero. He is doing so because he is compromised. He is rich and has many millions (if not billions) involved in Middle East finances, and if he came out against the mosque, he's lose his butt. So, to protect his money, and to make even more money, he has sided with those who would behead him. Bloomberg is a greedy and craven coward who would feed his own mother (and the rest of the world's Jews) to the barbarian hordes of Mohammed to protect a few sheckels.] The Islamists and their supporters are calling out that the First Amendment grants everyone the right to worship as they please, etc. True, to worship or not worship is a guaranteed choice. (Islam is all about mandatory submission) The First Amendment declares that the Congress shall not..... The First Amendment does NOT say that states, counties, cities, communities, may not establish rules and laws regarding religion. In fact, the state of Utah did regulate Mormonism by outlawing polygamy. There are other precedents as well. Obamacare exempted two religious groups from participation, a clear violation of the First Amendment prohibiting Congress from such acts. To remind, officials of the city of Temecula have acted courageously and prudently in the past: Wal-Mart - denied where the Promenade Mall now sits; pom shops have been denied; liquor sales in close proximity to schools has been denied; strip joints have been denied; sex offenders are restricted (by state law); other churches wanting to build in high traffic retail areas have been denied in order to permit commercial enterprises where maximum sales tax revenues are brought in. If any official is unable or incapable of learning and understanding the full historical, cultural, moral, and human rights implications of enabling Islam's encroachment on this community, he or she ought to acknowledge their lack of courage, competence, and understanding and recuse themselves from this issue, or resign. To learn more, one only needs an internet connected computer, the ability to jiggle a mouse, and let their fingers dance across a keyboard to learn the truths about Islam and its creator, Mohammed; the truths about him and understand that all adherents to Islam are required to emulate him, like Osarna bin Laden, the Saudi King and the `royals', Hamid Karzai, and Imam Harmoush (who does an real kitman loaded job of pretending he isn't an Islamist supportive of the destruction of America). Look to Europe to see what Islam is bringing to Denmark, Sweden (where Jews had to flee the city of Malmo), the Netherlands where Theo Van Gogh was slaughtered in the streets for his un -Moslem positions, and Parliamentarian Geert Wilders went on trial for telling the truth about Islam, Belgium where people are starting to push back, France where 'youths' (an euphemism for Moslem rioters) have been wreaking havoc for several years, Germany where Chancellor Angela Merkel has declared that multiculturalism has "utterly failed". Oh yes, I've attended an Interfaith Council affair recently -- a love -fest for Islamists presented by well meaning but ignorant ("can't we all just get along" and sing Kumbayah) people who don't understand that when the Moslems attain a 51% majority in America, the tables will change. When that occurs we non -Moslems will be treated just like non -Moslems in places like Libya, Cairo, the Sudan (genocide in Darfur and more), Somalia (where the few remaining and surviving Christians are being forced to dig up Christian cemeteries and scatter the bones), Yemen, Saudi Arabia (where all non - Moslems have been killed off), Muscat and Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, Syria (where the socialist government occasionally avoids murdering non -Moslems), Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan (and five other countries whose names end in `star', Bangladesh, Malaysia, Bandar Seri Begawan, Indonesia, and more, ALL of which share one commonality: daily bloodshed of non Moslems. With the interfaith agendas, I see well foolish people trying to say that "our Moslems" are better than "their" Moslems. Is this foolishly self delusional, or what? Islam must be -stopped. If not now, when? If not here, where? Ps: I've been asked why, being nearly 70, I am so involved in resisting Islam when it will not affect me. I do what I do because I know. I and my kinfolk and friends, you, other good people have grand children who will have children, and I care. When the time comes and I stand before God, I will have to answer whether I served Him or the devil. October 15, 2010 Mayor Jeff Comerchero 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Mayor Comerchero: Carlos Martello _ 31277 David Lane Temecula, CA 92592 Council P. Richardson RECEn►ED 8 Ciry MANAGER`S OFFICE It is of great concern to me that the City Council has given rubber stamp approval for the construction of a mega Mosque (aka Islamic Center) without having given due diligence to the matter. Not only does the current environment in general demand that proper investigation into the sources of funding and the ideological outlook of its Imam be made but the specifics of this project make it imperative. The project has been represented as having been funded by and to provide service to 150 families, but the scope of the project's enormous 25,000 square feet belies that assertion. Given this unrealistic assertion assurances MUST be made that the funding does not come from terrorist front groups and that Sharia Law with its anti-Semitic, misogynistic, anti -tolerance, and anti-American teachings is NOT going to be promoted in this city. Should Temecula become a center of even minor terrorist activity it is most unlikely that you and your colleagues will be held blameless when the situation surrounding the new center is so blatantly suspicious. Sincerely, Carlos Martello Bonnie M. Tarskey 23833 ,7onathan 'Place furnreta, CX 92562 951.600.4890 September 15, 2010 Members of the Temecula City Council 43200 Business Park Dr P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Dear Members of the Council: American people are naturally trusting, accepting and welcoming to newcomers to our shores as well as to our neighborhoods. This is a good thing. There are times, however, when our trust and openness can be used against us. I would hope that you, as members of the council, would take the time to become informed as to the history of Muslim immigration into a country, a city or a community before permitting them to build a 25000 sq. ft. mosque in our community. I am including, in this letter an excerpt from a speech given by Brigitte Gabriel. Brigitte was born in Lebanon and experienced first hand the horror inflicted on the Christians after the Muslims reached a large portion of the population. She has written several books on the subject of Muslim oppression. Please read her books and find out how Muslims plan to spread their ideology throughout the world. I am sure you are familiar with Marro Bakh. He speaks with authority as a former Muslim who barely escaped Iran after the fall of the Shaw. He also has experienced the death and destruction brought to a people when Islam takes over a country. Please read about his experiences in the book, Escaping Islam. Please listen to the experiences of others who have lived with the threat of death because they have left Islam or have broken a rule. I could get you in touch with a young girl, named Ema, who is here seeking political asylum from Kuwait. She plays the guitar and sings. She was targeted for arrest because the Mullahs didn't like the songs she sang. Listen to her story and your eyes will open to the cruel and evil religion that is Islam. Ema said Americans do not understand Islam. She said that from the time she was a small child, she was taught to kill unbelievers. "They showed us how to take knives and cut the throat of an infidel." Do you want the children who will attend this Mosque, taught these things? Americans need to wake up to the fact that Islam isnot a religion but a totalitarian ideology that is completely incompatible with freedom and the American Constitution. It is the antithesis of Christianity_ Islam is intent on controlling the entire world. They are using our freedom of religion against us and will continue to build their mosques all over this country. When they reach a certain number of members and converts, it will then become clear what they are all about. But then it will be too late. Sincerely, poz.n4,c2 Bonnie Parsley P.S. I own two excellent documentaries on Islam—Obsession, and Islam -What the West Needs to Know. I would be happy to loan either or both of these to you for your viewing. LESSONS FROM LEBANON Editor's Note: Below are selected excerpts from Brigitte Gabriel's speech delivered at the Intelligence Summit in Washington DC. We gather here today to share information and knowledge. Intelligence is not merely cold hard data about numerical strength or armament or disposition of military forces. The most important element of intelligence has to be understanding the mindset and intention of the enemy. The West has been wallowing in a state of ignorance and denial for thirty years as Muslim extremist perpetrated evil against innocent victims in the name of Allah. I was ten years old when my home exploded around me, burying me under the rubble and leaving me to drink my blood to survive, as the perpetrators shouted, 'Allah Akbarr My only crime was that I was a Christian living in a Christian town. At 10 years old, I learned the meaning of the word 'infidel.' I had a crash course in survival. Not in the Girl Scouts, but in a bomb shelter where I lived for seven years in pitch darkness, freezing cold, drinking stale water and eating grass to live. At the age of 13, dressed in my burial clothes going to bed at night, waiting to be slaughtered. By the age of 20, I had buried most of my fiiends—killed by Muslims. We were not Americans living in New York, or Britons in London. We were Arab Christians living in Lebanon. As a victim of Islamic terror, I was amazed when I saw Americans waking up on September 12, 2001, and asking themselves 'Why do they hate us? The psychoanalyst experts were coming up with all sort of excuses as to what did we do to offend the Muslim World. But if America and the West were paying attention to the Middle East they would not have had to ask the question. Simply put, they hate us because we are defined in their eyes by one simple word: 'infidels. Under the banner of Islam 'la, ilaha illa Allah, muhammad Rasoulu Allah,' (None is god except Allah; Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah) they murdered Jewish children in Israel, masssacred Christians in. Lebanon, killed Copts in Egypt, Assyrians in Syria, Hindus in India, and expelled almost 900,000 Jews from Muslim lands. We Middle Eastern infidels paid the price then. Now infidels worldwide are paying the price for indifference and shortsightedness. Tolerating evil is a crime. Appeasing murderers :doesn't buy protection. It earns one disrespect and loathing in the enemy's eyes. Yet apathy is the weapon by which the West is committing suicide. Political correctness forms the shackles around our ankles; by which Islamist's are leading us to our despise. America and the West are doomed to failure in this war unless they stand up and identify the real enemy: Islam. You hear about Cahaba and Salafi Islam as the only extreme form of Islam. All the other Muslims, supposedly, are wonderful moderates. Closer to the truth are the pictures of the irrational eruption of violence in reaction to the cartoons of Mohammed printed by a Danish newspaper. From burning embassies, to callsto butcher those who mock Islam, to warnings that the West be prepared for another holocaust, those pictures have given us a glimpse into the real face of the enemy. News pictures and video of these events represent a canvas of hate decorated by different nationalities who share one common ideology of hate, bigotry and intolerance derived from one source: authentic Islam; an Islamn that is awakening from centuries of slumber to re -ignite its wrath against the infidel and dominate the world; an Islam which has declared 'Intifada' on the West. America and the West can no longer afford to lie in their lazy state of overweight ignorance. The consequences of this mental disease are starting to attack the body, and if they don't take the necessary steps now to control it, death will be knocking soon. If you want to understand the nature of the enemy we face, visualize a tapestry of snakes. They slither and they hiss, and they would eat each other alive, but they will unite in a hideous mass to achieve their common goal of imposing Islam on the world. This is the ugly face of the enemy we are fighting. We are fighting a powerful ideology that is capable of altering basic human instincts; an ideology that can turn a mother into a launching pad of death. A perfect example is a recently elected Hamas official in the Palestinian Territories who raves in heavenly joy about sending her three sons to death and offering the ones who are still alive for the cause. It is an ideology that is capable of offering highly educated individuals such as doctors and lawyers far more joy in attaining death than any respect and stature life in society is ever capable of giving them. The United States has been a prime target for radical Islamic hatred and terror. Every Friday, mosques in the Middle East ring with shrill prayers and monotonous chants calling death, destruction and damnation down on America and its people. The radical Islamist deeds have been as vile as their words. Since the Iran hostage crisis, more than three thousand Americans have died in a terror campaign almost unprecedented in its calculated cruelty along with thousands of other citizens worldwide. Even the Nazis did not turn their own children into human bombs, and then rejoice at their deaths as well the deaths of their victims. This intentional, indiscriminate and wholesale murder of innocent American citizens is justified and glorified in the name of Islam. America cannot effectively defend itself in this war unless and until the American people understand the nature of the enemy that we face. Even after 9/11 there are those who say that we must engage our terrorist enemies, that we must address their grievances, Their grievance is our freedom of religion. Their grievance is our freedom of speech_ Their grievance is our democratic process where the rule of law comes from the voices of many not that of just one prophet. It is the respect we instill in our children towards all religions. It is the equality we grant each other as human beings sharing a planet and striving to make the world a better place for all humanity. Their grievance is the kindness and respect a man shows a woman, the justice we practice as equals under the law, and the mercy we grant our enemy. 'Their grievance cannot be answered by an apology for who or what we are. Our mediocre attitude of not confronting Islamic forces of bigotry and hatred wherever they raised their ugly head in the last 30 years, has empowered and strengthened our enemy to launch a full scale attack on the very freedoms we cherish in their effort to impose their values and way of life on our civilization. If we don't wake up and challenge our Muslim community to take action againstthe terrorists within it, if we don't believe in ourselves as Americans and in the standards we should hold every patriotic American to, we are going to pay a price for our delusion. For the sake of our children and our country, we must wake up and take action. In the face of a torrent of hateful invective and terrorist murder, America's learning curve since the Iran hostage crisis is so shallow that it is almost flat. The longer we lay supine, the more difficult it wilI be to stand erect. Brigitte Gabriel is an expert on the Middle East conflict and lectures nationally and internationally on the subject. She's the former news anchor of World News for Middle East television and the founder of AmericanCongressforTruth.com. Eric Jones From: Stuart Fisk Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:15 PM To: Eric Jones Subject: FW: Citizen Web Contact: City Hall Departments » Planning Department Attachments: Description of Sharia.docx; Religious Freedom and a Mosque.docx; Andrew McCarthy - Darwa.docx From: City Website Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010. 3:39 PM To: Stuart Fisk Subject: Citizen Web Contact: City Hall Departments » Planning Department A Contact Us Web Form has been submitted to: City Hall Departments » Planning Department First Name: Arny Last Name: LaBruyere Email Address: alabruyereP,roadrunner.com Type of Request: Question Description: How can the city consider allowing an Islamic Training Center to be built when it contradicts Article 6 of the Constitution of the United States? Location: Nicholas Road Additional Information or Comments. If 1s imperative that you are explicitly aware of all implicationsinvolved-when considering the allowance 62 Islamic Training Center to be built within our town. "have attached multiple sites and files for you at the bottom of this; conmicnt 'section to explain exactly what it is we are dealing with and why it is so completely different than what most assume it is. . I did not write this, but it is very direct and insigl tfiii To those who are convinced the -debate is religious tolerance, I would respectfully ask you if you consider that framing it in that limited basis is to undermine' Constitutional law arid ,:the Bill of Thglits. I would suggest that you seriously consider the i.utieinselfdestruCtive consequences Islam as faith is:an inalienable Constitutional right;l ut'the ShariacLegal System isnot. When in conflict with the Constitution, and in matters of inalienable=rights"Sharia always. is, practitioners:of the faith cani of claim faith to protect anon-existent'rigiit' 10 trump or in any way. dissolve, weaken, ignore, "Constitutional law. `Sharia`Law, :the Islamic legal system does not recognize any protected Col stitutional:right ... go over the first 11 Amendments and the 14414 see how Sharia stands in direct opposition to" all lnalieriable;and equal"treatn entiprotection/adjudication. Put the two thoughts together: Sharia;; no inalienable rights. Constitution, protected, inalienable rights. One simply CAN NOT follow Islam AND" Constitutional law. Fora practicing Muslim, rejecting Sharia is to reject Islam, they -cannot because the legal system and"the faith are inseparable. Think of the Christian conceptof Trinity, they cannot choose Father and 1 not Son or Holy Spirit. Neither can a practicing Muslim true to his faith, separate Islam from Sharia. And so, while religious tolerance is a Constitutional fundamental, using faith as an excuse to ignore the law of THIS land certainly is not. The Constitution is the ONLY law of this land, our Bill of Rights cannot peacefully co- exist with a legal system that for example, provides for slavery, indentured servitude, misogyny, women and children as chattel owned by husbands, fathers, male relatives and subject to genital mutilation, stoning. "honor" killing, primitive and inhumane punishments, child marriages, polygamy, etc. For starters. Sharia simply cannot and MUST not be allowed to exist on sovereign US soil. It is not up to us to remedy this for them, it is up to them to live up to and under OUR laws. If Muslims cannot (and their faith demands they do not) follow Constitutional law in our land, then they have one other protected right. Leave the USA and go where they can follow the Sharia legal system. We simply cannot tolerate Sharia here. Non-negotiable. I don't say it. Constitutional law does. The renegade gov't, both federal and state have not defended their oaths to uphold and defend Constitutional law, instead, they have allowed AND PROTECTED Sharia to be actively practiced in the Islamic community here. If an non-Muslim (American) were to commit ANY of the above, you can write in stone they would' be severely punished with years, if not life, if not capital punishment, in prison. Yet our gov't goes against our law and allows Sharia to flourish. And so, whether the Mosque near WTC or any other mosque, all preach EXCLUSIVE adherence, as a matter of RELIGIOUS DOCTRINE, DOGMA and OBLIGATION. None, not even the so called "moderate" ones reject Sharia and/or preach adherence to Constitutional law, inalienable rights, Bill of Rights, etc. in this country (or elsewhere). And so, I would argue because ALL mosques are in the anti-constitutional business of sedition as a matter of faith, practice and action, each town, county, state and federal gov't legislators should declare. Sharia illegal/unconstitutional and prohibit its practice in ANY form here. As long as a mosque, ANY mosque obligates Sharia as a mandatory, INALIENAB LE part of the "faith," then mosques themselves should be as regarded as illegal as would any Casa Nostra illegal, crirhinal/seditious,'conspiratorial enterprise. Conservatives, Christians, Jews, religious'laws adhere to the Constitution, Bill of Rights, letter and spirit. Islam does not. Unless and until they do, they cannot and will not assimilate and adopt the law of the land. And WE SHOULD NOT BE PRETENDING this is any better or different than the drug cartels, the Casa Nostra or any other illegal enterprise. "Whensoever's the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force.- Thomas Jefferson As far as stopping them, WE HAVE THE POWER to do so, not in DC but beginning in our own towns, demanding our town councils pass local ordinances prohibiting building mosques on, the grounds that they teach sedition and commit crimes against the constitution. Building and. zoning can then refuse permits. Conflict of mega-mosques in America spreading islam www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfin/fini/68924/see id/68924 What a mosque is - the differences of islani other actual religions www.newenglishreview:org/custpage cfnn/frrn/68472/sec id/68472 What Islam is.Not Explains how their behavior changes as theirpercentage of the population increases - Graphic, but necessary to Understanding' (video) www.youtuhe.com/watch?v--VEXWAJ83E Islam 101 - An easy to understandguide on what islatiiiS=amt how it originated wvvWjihad*ateh.org/islam-101.1itml The Civilization War- How Islam' Carries Out War www.politicalislam com/ Three Things to Know About Islam http://www.youtubecom/.watch?v—Ib9r'ofXQ16w Un-American to Regulate Religion? http;//www.youtube.corn/watch?v-0a3TYFBQCOg: 2 Posted on Alipac Louisiana At Leading Edge In Fight Against Shariah Tuesday, August 17, 2010 By Christopher Holton, Vice President, Center for Security Policy There is a term which you may have seen or heard mentioned in the news, the blogosphere or on talk radio lately that you should know more about: Shariah. (Sometimes spelled Sharia or Shari'a, as well as some other variations.) Readers of The Hayride may also be interested to learn that Louisiana is actually at the forefront of the fight against Shariah. Background: What Exactly lsShariah? Polling done by Family Security Group back in 2008 indicated that only 3% ofAmericanswere even aware of the term Shariah—and an even smaller percentage actually knew what it was. So we will begin with a basic description of Shariah. Shariah, often referred to as "Islamic Law," is in actuality a legal doctrine based on the Quran and Hadiths (sayings and acts of Mohammed), but one which goes far beyond what Westerners would regard as religious matters or routine legal matters. Shariah covers all aspects of life, including criminal law, domestic law, statecraft and warfare (Jihad). Shariah encompa**** personal ethics and legal issues, religion and state governance, this world and the afterlife. Shariah is said to enforce the will of Allah, as opposed to the will of humans. Shariah regulates belief, speech and religious practice, criminal and legal matters, as well well a_ s finance and war and the financing of ��' 4€" �r hi �? S w:._5%' F' j<u �si` .�s � 4 %e' i, ` ,„7---174.,,,,,„`'.r�r-r ' E l'1 at -r4 g. war e ° t nig as s a , la r or�os�cla�r haw .��` .YY"w�'F"'�. r��� a�"�3°r'M �� a `� � � r e * ! eti°. ,. a f reelx igi nAn rG � ,d1si1rn�ctt u are Shariah is a code which is best known for being the law of the land in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Sudan, three nations with some of the most horrible human rights records in the world, it is no coincidence that these three nations are also heavily involved in .7ihadist terrorism. Shariah can be accurately described as reactionary, deliberately vague and, in its implementation, barbaric. Shariah mandates as a religious obligation: • Violent jihad against non -Muslims to establish Islam's rule worldwide (known as the caliphate). • The killing of apostates from Islam. • The killing of adulterers and homosexuals. • Severe discrimination against women. This includes persecution of women and execution by stoning of women who are suspected of adultery. Often these women are in reality victims of rape. • Barbaric punishment (limb amputations, gouging out of eyes) for petty crimes such as theft. • Severe discrimination against, and the subjugation of, non - Muslims. • For those Muslims who cannot engage in physical jihad using force, shariah mandates that they support jihad financially— "Jihad with money." Shariah and its tenets are completely at odds with everything America and Western Civilization stand for: freedom, equality, tolerance and justice. The promotion of shariah represents a commitment to the replacement of secular political orders. In other words, shariah sets as its goal the destruction of documents like the US Constitution and the basic liberties set out therein. The purpose of Shariah is submission. Shariah seeks to establish that Allah is the divine lawgiver and that no other law may properly exist but Allah's law. Shariah tries to attain this objective using non-violent methods. However when required, and under specified sets of conditions, the use of violence and outright war to establish the supremacy of Shariah is not just allowed, but required, This use of force or war is called Jihad. A key objective ofShariah is to establish submission to Allah's law by either converting people to Islam or subjugating them to rule under Shariah law The doctrine of ]ihad is fundamental under Shariah because it is based upon unambiguous verses in the Quran and Hadiths. Jihad is regarded as key in Islamic jurisprudence: until the kafir (unbelievers: infidels and polytheists)are converted, subjugated, or eliminated, their mischief and power will injure the Islamic world. Jihad is waged chiefly through violence and war but it also includes other non-violent methods such as infiltration, subversion and information/psychological warfare. Here is a very important point: Shariah is very different from other forms of religious law, such as Jewish halacha taw or Catholic canon law in that neither of the latter is meant to apply to non -Jews or non-Catholics respectively. In contrast, much of Shariah is explicitly meant to apply to non -Muslims. ,uires nra [So when Harmoush says he doesn't adhere to Shariah, he's LYING! Not only acceptable to islam, but encouraged to do so for its furthering! He could not be an imam and teach islam if he does not adhere to shariah.] Shariah and Violent Jihad The connection between Shariah and violent Jihad is important because it represents the most apparent :though far from only—threat from Shariah. A detailed review of Jihadi literature reveals that, in fact, Shariah is the enemy's threat doctrine. Shariah is the basis for everything the Jihadists do and it is also their main goal. Don't take my word for it, here it is in their own words: • The sharia has forbidden us from taking infidels as confidants, inducting them into our secrets. • The sharia forbids us from appointing infidels to important posts. • The sharia forbids us from adopting or praising the beliefs and views of the infidels. • The sharia forbids us from assisting infidels against Muslims; even the one who is coerced has noexcuse to fight under the banner of the infidels. • The sharia commands us to battle infidels both original infidels and apostates, as well as hypocrites. As for waging jihad against the infidels who have usurped the lands of Islam, this is a duty considered second only to faith, by ulemaic consensus, • The sharia does not accept the excuses made by hypocrites—that they befriend the infidels because they fear the vicissitudes of time. • We are duty-bound by the sharia to help Muslims overcome the infidel - Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al Qaeda Ideologue and 2nd in Command "Democracy is based on the principle of the power of creatures over other creatures, and rejects the principle of God's absolute power over all creatures; it is also based on the idea that men's desires, whatever they may be, replace God absolutely, and on the refusal to obey God's law. In Islam, when there is a disagreement or a difference of opinion, one refers to God, his Prophet, and the commands of sharia." - Ayman al-Zawahiri "Fromthe point of view of ideology and sharia, we are required to establish God's rule over any part of this earth, regardless of particularities and details. This can only happen, however, if the nation adopts this ideology and safeguards it." - Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Commander of Hizballah "The laws of the shari'a embrace a diverse body of laws and regulations, which amounts to a complete social system. In this system of laws, all the needs of man have been met: his dealings with his neighbors, fellow citizens, and clan, as well as children and relatives; the concerns of private and marital life; regulations concerning war and peace and intercourse with other nations; penal and commercial law; and regulations pertaining to trade and agriculture." - Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic Of Iran 1979-1989 "Reason also dictates that we establish a government in order to be able to ward off aggression and to defend the honor of the Muslims in case of attack. The shari'a, for its part, instructs us to be constantly ready to defend ourselves against those who wish to attack us." - Ayatollah Khomeini "It will be the duty of the Muslims to engage in an armed jihad against the ruling group in order to make the policies ruling society and the norms of government conform to the principles and ordinances of Islam." - Ayatollah Khomeini "If the enemy attacks the lands of the Muslims or their borders, it is the duty of all Muslims to defend them by any means possible, including the sacrificing of one's life and the expenditure of one's wealth. With respect to this matter, there is no need toseek the permission from a shari'a judge." Ayatollah Khomeini "Our whole struggle is for the enforcement of Shariah law." - Muslim Khan, Taliban spokesman "Practically everything valued by the immoral West is. condemned under sharia law. The sharia provides a true and just path, securing Muslims, and providing peace to the world. Muslims, and especially the learned among them, should spread sharia law to the world—that and nothing else. Not laws under the "umbrella of justice, morality, and rights" as understood by the masses. No, the sharia of Islam is the foundation. They say that our sharia does not impose our particular beliefs upon others; this is a false assertion. For it is, in fact, part of our religion to impose our particular beliefs upon others. Thus whoever refuses the principle of terror[ism] against the enemy also refuses the commandment of Allah the Exalted, the Most High, and His sharia." - Osama Bin Laden Whenever an attempted Jihadi attack occurs or terrorist plot surfaces here in the US, it is important to realize that there is a doctrine underlying these. actions. (The Center for Security Policy has made available, free of charge, the definitive work on the subject of Shariah and Jihad on its web site: To Our Great Detriment: Ignoring What Extremists Say About Jihad ). Stealth Jihad: The Civilization Threat The threat from Shariah extends far beyond that of violent Jihad. The threat also manifests itself in other ways. This threat is sometimes referred to with three interchangeable terms: • "Creeping Shariah" • "Stealth Jihad" • "Civilizational Jihad" When Jihadist forces are not powerful enough to impose Shariah by force, Shariah slowly infiltrates a target society and culture over time. This has already occurred in much of Western Europe: sr S! r.;��"�� - �,a+ � 416.4" .� M 5 � 0 � � fiii ®fc e .arta Originally meant to strictly settle disputes between Muslims, 15% of the cases they hear now involve disputes with non -Muslims. • In several nations, including Sweden and France, Muslim enclaves have developed which are essentially autonomous zones that are ruled by Shariah law. • In the United Kingdom and South Africa, due to the "necessity" of accommodating Muslims into the welfare system and succession and inheritance laws, polygamouss.' Muslim marriages are now de facto' recognized by the respective governmen s. Lest you think that this will not become a problem in the United States, think again. Shariah is already starting to appear in our r courts, especially in the area of family law: s The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which was identified as a Muslim Brotherhood organization and named an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing conviction in US history (United States versus Holy Land Foundation), rens arbi r onsy;here in.the U a cording o har ah • There have been dozens of instances in which Shariah has been invoked in US courts, mostly unsuccessfully, but not always. Here are two of the most infamous cases, brought to our attention by Stephen Gele of Lawyers Against Shariah: s ©4 : cate. "This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did ���� � vesx, is w s o,$ 'r�r �rideYr i s„ s P+ z K s CKs' ' s e li f that=it fia'i ' -�`:_ �ia5ta,r� • '��; ✓ - at�x' ` � fi»xi�'�� wy ��+ � ��r'r�a fa"t'�"�r i.��z7 5,... sist Fortunately, an appellate court overturned this atrocious decision, and a Shariah ruling by a U.S. court was not allowed to stand, In a Maryland case, Hosain v. Malik, 108 Md.App. 284, 671 A.2d 988 (Md.1996), a Maryland Court granted comity and enforced a Pakistani custody order turning a child brought to the US by the mother over to the father. The Maryland Court held that: the burden was on the mother to prove the Pakistani court did not apply law in "substantial conformity with Maryland law" by a preponderance of the evidence; the case was "not about whether Pakistani religion, culture, or legal system is personally offensive to us or whether we share all of the same values, mores and customs, but rather whether the Pakistani courts applied a rule of law, evidence,or procedure so contradictory to Maryland public policy as to undermine the confidence in the trial"; the best interest of'the childashould not be "determined based on Maryland law, i.e; American' cultures and mores" but rather "by'applying relevant Pakistani customs, culture and mores";"a Pakistani court could only determine the best interest of a Pakistani child by an analysis utilizing the customs, culture, religion, and mores of . Pakistan"; culture, the well being of the child and'the child's proper e elopmenr s thou eye the Pakistani order was not the result of "a trial by fire, trial by ordeal, or a system rooted in superstition, or witchcraft"; the "Io ng do ctri em c rge Louisiana residents may be interested in knowing that similar cases have arisen in the Bayou State, including a child custody case with fortunately a very different outcome from that in Maryland (again, thanks to Stephen Gele): In Amin v. Bakhaty, 01-1967 (La.10/16/01), 798 So.2d 75, the Louisiana Supreme Court refused to enforce an Egyptian custody order stating that:The only other forum that could possibly determine custody would be Egypt. However, the Egyptian Court is not compelled to consider the minor child's best interest, [The father] would have the absolute right to guardianship, as well as the right to physical custody. This Court believes that a parent's interest in a relationship with his or her child is a basic human right. Egypt follows. Islamic family faw, which structures some of the rights between family members based solely on gender. Under the Egyptian concept of "guardianship," the father has the absolute right to the guardianship and the physical custody of the minor child. [The father]`s affidavit when he petitioned for a civil warrant confirmed this structure in Islamic law, stating that by operation of Egyptian law, both the temporary guardianship and physical custody of [the child] rested exclusively with him. The unique circumstances of this case required more consideration for the best interest of this child than for the extension of comity toward the Egyptian./Islamic legal system. American and Louisiana Laws for Louisiana Courts State lawmakers across America are starting to take action to prevent the US from ending up like Western Europe, a victim of Creeping Sharjah, Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich recently addressed the issue in a policy speech: Video: Newt Gingrich: Ban Sharia - It is" totally abhorrent to the Western World" htto: / /thehavride.com/2010/08/louisiana-at-leading-edge-in-fight-aq.,. Some of you may have heard of the upcoming ballot initiative in Oklahoma to outlaw Shariah law. This initiative will appear on the ballot there in November. Most people do not realize, however, that, along with Tennessee, Louisiana already took the lead in preventing Shariah from creeping into our legal system with a new law which has been nicknamed "American and Louisiana Laws for Louisiana Courts." This law, Act 714 of the regular Louisiana 2010 legislative session, http: / /www.legis.state.la.usJbilldata/Authors.asp?sessionid= .ORS&am... was a collaborative effort by Rep. Ernest Wooton and Senator Danny Martiny. Governor Bobby 3indal's office was aware of this bill and its intent from the earliest stages and the governor dispatched staff to appear in support of the bill in committee: The key passage in this important piece of legislation explains its intent and effect "The legislature finds that it shall be the public policy of this state to protect its citizens from the application of foreign laws when the application of a foreign law will result in the violation of a right guaranteed by the constitution of this state or of the United States, including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech, or press, and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the constitution of this state." Because Shariah is inherently violative of the basic constitutional liberties which Americans hold dear, this law arms judges and attorneys with the tool they need to prevent anything such as happened in Maryland and New Jersey from happening in Louisiana, Act 714 is now model legislation for the rest of the country and has already been used by legislators in states from coast to coast to prepare legislation in the 2011 legislative session. http: / /thehavride.com / 2010108/Louisiana-at-leading-edge-in-fight-ag... many links on this post; go to the link above if you wish to view them Religious Freedom and a Mosque By BiII Warner August 30, 2010, posted in FrontPage Magazine One of the most common arguments of the supporters of the Ground Zero mosque includes religious freedom as guaranteed by the First Amendment. Religion is seen as the framework to support building a mosque and community center near the site of the former World Trade Towers. Is this really about religion? Step back and look at the controversy. Do you feel like you are taking part in a religious exercise or a political fracas? There is a vast confusion about what a religion is and is not. Currently the operative rule is that anything associated with Islam is a religious affair where all of the freedom of religion is applied to the action or event. Islam's actions are religious and if you oppose it, you are an un-American bigot. It is time to stop and take a look at what we mean by a religion. There are about as many Buddhists in America today as there are Muslims. When was the last time you remember a Buddhist demand of any kind? Do Buddhists set up councils to shape the textbooks and demand Buddhist finance? Does the government make a big announcement when Buddhists are appointed to high posts? Are there even any Buddhists in any White House appointments? Do Buddhists complain? Never, for these are political actions, and Buddhism has almost no political outreach. Buddhism in America is purely religious, not political at all. Yet the media and the Internet are consumed by talk and argument about Islam. The discussion is never about how many rounds of prayer to do or whether a certain food is halal (religiously proper). No, the focus is always on something that non -Muslims are to do to accommodate an Islamic religious practice. There is a practical working definition of religion as compared to politics: Religious practices are done by those who follow that religion and are motivated for achieving paradise and avoiding hell. Outsiders are not involved in those religious acts. If it is about going to heaven and avoiding hell, then it is religious. However, if the religion makes a demand on those outside of its own group, then that demand is political. Most people think that the Koran is a religious text. Instead, 64% of the text (by word count) is about non -Muslims, who are called Kafirs. The Koran is fixated on Kafirs and makes many demands on them. Not the least is, that Kafirs submit to the rule of Islamic Sharia law. Ultimately Sharia law is the pure expression of Islamic politics and it completely contradicts our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Under Sharia there is no freedom of speech, wives may be beaten and apostates murdered. Mohammed had little success with Islam until he transformed it into a political system. He preached the religion of Islam in Mecca for 13 years and made about 150 converts. He left Mecca and moved to Medina. In Medina he turned to politics and jihad. In the last 9 years of his life, Mohammed was involved in an event of violence on the average of every 6 weeks. The political method persuaded every Arab to convert to Islam. The religion did not succeed; it was politics that made Islam powerful. Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam Permalink copyright (c) CBSX, LLC politicalislam.com Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit. Andrew McCarthy, who headed up the prosecution in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, was a featured speaker at the recent ACT! for America 2010 National Conference and Legislative Briefing. McCarthy, author of the excellent book The Grand Jihad, recently weighed in on the controversy surrounding the "Ground Zero Mosque" and its imam—notably, a book written by the imam that has a very different name for Arabic -speaking audiences than for English-speaking audiences. (See commentary below, highlights added.) Opposition to the mosque continues to grow—as do the number of people who have signed our petition. If you haven't yet done so, please click here to add your name today! http://article.nafionalreview.com/print)?q=MmNhNTgOZmY1 NzA4NWJmMIMOYj11 MzAwNzIIYjFiNDM NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE www.nationalreview.com Andrew C. McCarthy July 24, 2010 4:00 A.M. Raufs Dawa from the World Trade Center Rubble Meet the Ground Zero Mosque imam's Muslim Brotherhood friends. Feisal Abdul Rauf is the imam behind the "Cordoba Initiative" that is spearheading plans tobuild a $100 million Islamic center at Ground Zero, the site where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed by jihadists on 9/11. He is also the author of a book called What's Right with Islam Is What's Right with America. But the book hasn't always been called that. It was called quite something else for non -English-speaking audiences. In Malaysia, it was published as A Cal! to Prayer from the World Trade Center Rubble: Islamic Dawa in the Heart of America Post -9/11. Now it emerges that a "special, non-commercial edition" of this book was later produced, with Feisal's cooperation, by two American tentacles of the Muslim Brotherhood: the Islamic Society of North America and the International Institute of Islamic Thought. The book's copyright page tells the tale: A ve0alroart-tontinereial edition to promote a Fop& understanding o(fal= and ootaatort pound between Islam and ihe West By pennission front the author Imam Feiss] Abdul Rauf This edidat was made possible thsouglt a joint effort of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (In)and the orlee of Interfaith end ConununityMilance of the Mamie Soddy of North America (SNA) undiag for this prefect vials provi ded by Err Mar's }bum MTH Tst 5 res MGM' wmt Ammo*. Copyright 02004 by Feiss' Abdul Rod, Allt;ighw raved. Ninted in the United States of America; No part of this book rmy he used or ttlytaltited n dely roanner wilatscever without -written pennissbut estept in the se °Mid glootattessierubodied ncrib—cm' I =tides alai reviews. For infortiov• add HarperCollins POlishers, W gest Sard Street, New York, i•IY10022. flosperCollias books may be paxhosed cc educational, business, or sales Foinotional use Ike infonnationplesie twit*: Special Mathes Doperintent, lissperCollins Publishes% 10 Brat 53rd Olivet New York, NY10M. ffsupetCollinsykreb site: bttpd iwwntharpetrollistsxons NatpetCollinst se, and liatpet9ner" ant trOnStarbs of NorpolC011ihS Publishers. HAR.PEXCOWVIS PAPERDA,ACT; gritrON PIP/14313M 15 2005 The Libraly.tiC/45VAISSC,Skakentin-Pubb:c4iion Dab iS einiolohle upon request ran 08-0-06-171074 00% 10111210MM') 109814. S 4321 Islam is a comprehensive political, social, and economic system with its own authoritarian legal framework, sharia, which aspires to govern all aspects of life. Sharia prohibits the preaching of creeds other than Islam, the renunciation of Islam, any actions that divide the umma, and homosexuality. Its penalties are draconian, including savagely executed death sentences for apostates, homosexuals, and adulterers. And indeed he is: a prominent, Qatar -based scholar whose weekly Al Jazeera program on the subject of sharia is viewed by millions and whose cyber- venture, Islam Online, is accessed by millions more, including Muslims in the United States. Not surprisingly, his rabble -rousing was a prime cause of the deadly global rioting by Muslims when an obscure Danish newspaper published cartoon depictions of Mohammed. Qaradawi regards the United States as the enemy of Islam. He has urged that Muslims "fight the American military if we can, and if we cannot, we should fight the U.S. economically and politically." In 2004, he issued a fatwa (an edict based on sharia) calling for. Muslims to kill Americans in Iraq. A leading champion of Hamas, he has issued similar approvals of suicide bombings in Israel. Moreover, as recounted in Matthew Levitt's history of Hamas, Qaradawi has decreed that Muslims must donate money to "support Palestinians fighting occupation.... If we can't carry out acts of jihad ourselves, we at least should support and prop up the mujahideen [Le., Islamic raiders or warriors] financially and morally." Qaradawi's support for Hamas is only natural. Since that organization's 1987 founding, it has been the top Muslim Brotherhood priority to underwrite Hamas's jihadist onslaught against the Jewish state. Toward that end, the Muslim Brotherhood mobilized the Islamist infrastructure in the United States. The original building block of that infrastructure was the Muslim Students Association (MSA), established in the early Sixties to groom young Muslims in the Brotherhood's ideology — promoting sharia, Islamic supremacism, and a worldwide caliphate. As Andrew Bostom elaborated in a New York Post op-ed on Friday, Imam Rauf, too, is steeped in this ideology. In 1981, after two decades of churning out activists from its North American chapters (which now number over 600), the Brotherhood merged the MSA into ISNA. In its own words, ISNA was conceived as an umbrella organization "to advance the cause of Islam and service Muslims in North America so as to enable them to adopt Islam as a complete way of life." That same year, the Brotherhood created IIIT as a Washington - area Islamic think tank dedicated to what it describes as "the Islamicization of knowledge." After Hamas was created, the top Brotherhood operative in the United States, Mousa Abu Marzook — who actually ran Hamas from his Virginia home for several years in the early Nineties — founded the Islamic Association for Palestine to boost Hamas's support. One of his co-founders was Sami al -Arian, then a student and Muslim Brotherhood member, later a top U.S. operative of the terrorist organization Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which he helped guide from his perch as a professor at the University of South Florida. In 2006, al -Arian was convicted on terrorism charges. Marzook and other Brotherhood figures established the Occupied Land Fund, eventually renamed the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), to be Hamas's American fundraising arm. The HLF was headquartered in ISNA's Indiana office. As the Justice Department explained in a memorandum submitted in the HLF case: During the early years of HLF's operation, HLF raised money and supported Hamas through a bank account it held with ISNA.... Indeed, HLF (under its former name, OLF) operated from within ISNA,. in Plainfield, Illinois.... ISNA checks deposited into the ISNA/[North American Islamic Trust] account for the HLF were often made payable to "the Palestinian Mujahideen," the original name for the Hamas military wing.... From the ISNA/NAIT account, the HLF sent hundreds of thousands of dollars to Hamas leader Mouse Abu Marzook .... and a number of other individuals associated with Hamas. Ultimately, the HLF raised over $36 million for Hamas. At the height of the intifada, this was not about the social -welfare activities Hamas touts to camouflage its barbarism. As the journalist Stephen Schwartz of the Center. for Islamic Pluralism has observed, "Ordinary Americans should be shocked and outraged to learn that Hamas was running its terror campaign from a sanctuary in the U.S." In addition, prosecutors showed that ISNA was central to a 1993 meeting of top Brotherhood operatives, who were wiretapped "discussing using ISNA as an official cover for their activities." Meantime, in 1992, the IIIT contributed $50,000 to underwrite an al -Arian venture, the World & Islam Studies Enterprise (WISE), a front for Palestinian Islamic Jihad that ostensibly employed several members of the PIJ governing board. IIIT has been under federal investigation since 2002 — and after his terrorism conviction, al -Arian went into contempt of court rather than honor a grand jury subpoena in the probe. Ira 1991, the Muslim Brotherhood's American lea; memorandum for the organization's; close;associL rotnerno The memorandum included a list described by Akram as "our organizations and the organizations of our friends," working together to implement this sabotage strategy. Prominently included in that list were ISNA and IIIT. ---- Andrew C. McCarthy, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, is the author,. most recently, of The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America. CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION 0 = N 00 48 0 ▪ �0 0 °" Nca .4 0 �' vi 0 U rd Nvi `} g a 0 e� 5 0 -0 .� 0 ,.. N N N0 ti -4 03 = g m i.�to0 N VY N N 0 -,. -eii � � 0 ° .c - IA g 0 a) 1- � O. O 73 'c� N 5 . 0) b .5 o. 0� 3 0 U ' • .4 . s ., 0) 73 0 m &) 0 •a --' 4 s�N., i M .0 CS' 0) . 5 g NQ. - C0 _ bN ,-cd-E-,,...7....,0,8,4;.;:5.1 i• d ozN 0• .0.O 0c▪ 0 +v .0 r,, • a �', 0.4 '0 0- '� '. cV V O 4- N v, NTS N w C) • 5o' 1-4 .i~' -iso -0 — 0 b.0 N tn N ID N 0 1, _ b 1 q q CY 4. m r it 4,(1 id— Z..'" c) E 44 Z d L 12 Q 4; N�� m nUi o 5 u oact. E o. 'Q U 0 00 o ZI� _ o U )"t� • �C o s Lio. O. L O E 0) U qF.. • p O • L3. 0 v .mow �- 0 0 a8 o 3 al 00 ` C1.4 ea av3 c aG'AI .� o O 4 c -.In -5 01Z ' 'O 01 $ : L7 O t. --O 0 4 .-.47 g vi g W a) ,1' a) Q0 i* I. 0 12-1 joloegg yi:. inp 42 C....) : -- to ...�' -c- r -t • N .:: ..� O mre, ...e . �" .r i .E3,g § E4 - (3 ' 2 f L3.a.a a� • g0 -34 v W .�'g ..w... p. ota* 0 z11-~ "+ oo� 23g> '-4- U s,o -a ✓ c s�a)n,o1°� ▪ 0. t13 `ct 14 5 te 0.- - 075 0: _ N te 4) - 0 "6'- .'a. -�+ () t N 4) �.r 0 as Z. a) �� -c+-,tnrsa�0en0/'- O 49 .� i''.... ,� O 0 Z 03 y b �" n O rte,' 1"' 0 g ems g v, c ITY CITIZENS PETITION UI .7 OD .�0 1-' y i�.� 0 ijj0 . = W0 mo o.. ttr 5 Gi .�O v -,:s o 412 `+ • Q o - -.24 .,.a 43. on Ci r7f '� v "0 to Q x E p. a� Cki ` .0 0 -gjaw E , 23o ff,,; ,n.2 3 , m 0 —7 b .4 r-. cQ 0 -14 E+ 0"›:~ PI' op ami mi V 0.�a3+ G— E Q d 2 V h.♦ 1"" t- N •yy. V U T O t. T+ 0 . -. ,--1i-- 0 tj V cri eel r♦0% Od Q 0 Off" _� , i"� ▪ r'� M 0 1+01 a U .a0 • 0 S.."` i.. y 0 � .= 1-i [("1 [) 8 HtN 0 co ID b w N a5 o i.M. m . 4a'0 O -C3 ^ G to 4i o 5 q, o 0 -13r� E.V [t acg iL 17 GU 41 t -t A "V0 to 0 '1z� o o • g v, -tea •1 o , •-•-• •,g • .1 co 0.� Q ▪ a• Ati tA ITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED COM gas a dsi I-9 z' i 4 P. - he ei :,11= ® ns t .614 0 IP 0 45 ' ® °m -0 ®��-a -� u 2.7 c 0 0 8 es E � -Fg i -0 2 , 0 0 0 -Ii"! i 0 „a a' = = aim '0 ,c 40 0 0 - "'K CSA -CY Ca aw Za MI ,t ay�cpt, a 0- 0 0 a 0 S,713 0 ® =C 0 .,, s.®- E'0 4 ®oo 8 ® .w —® o o 4_4.� gi 0 0 =..«_ 0 � -Is 7,t3 -0 a_.„ m > o c mm ®air, 4- 0 0. 0 49)7 Tit 34 0E u a ... ® 0 . 0 0 . p 0 0 - ^ 2 €« ¢Y 0 0 ® Elk QS en 4.1 CD IV IX nry IS U9 13 c� LI S re CO 0 WI , E. 5... 3 E - = 0 5 0 46. . - TA (1:1;10 . . ,—, crit qtt 125 its g 4' :r A St 15 M 4v Wednesday, July 7, 2010 Mayor Comerchero, City Council, and Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Dr. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Mayor Comerchero,' City Council, and PIanning Commission: This letter is with regard to the Islamic Mosque being proposed on the property adjoining ours along a 1,000 ft. property line. There are several reasons why this proposal to build a mosque there is not a good thing: 1. There are already 2 Christian churches on 10 acres on this corner of Nicolas and Calle Medusa. Both congregations are growing. Adding a mosque on the same comer and on the same side of Nicolas would further constrict us. 2. The religious philosophy of Islam is directly contradictory and confrontational to the Christian faith we espouse. Putting a Muslim mosque within a few feet of a Baptist church exacerbates those differences. a. We have already had issues with them: i. Representatives from the Islamic center in Temecula came to us some time ago asking that we participate in an Anti -Israel -Pro -Palestinian rally they sponsored after one of the more violent conflicts between Israel and Gaza occurred. ii. They have approached us asking that we grant use of our parking lot to them because the size of the building they want requires more Iand than they have. (Please note that the back 2 acres of their property is a very steep unbuildable slope with a large home at the top.) b. We have members of our church whohave come from predominantly Muslim countries and have lived under the repressions and persecutions put upon them only because they were Christians. They are very expressive of their concerns for a Mosque being built right next to the church to which they come for worship: 3. From a practical standpoint, even disregarding the above issues, this piece of property is incompatible to their purposes. a. The buildable area is too small_ The remaining half of the existing cul-de-sac, with its corresponding right of way cuts out a good portion of the usable space. b. Most of the flatter lower portion is part of the flood plain, further reducing building possibilities. The water flows through our property and into theirs, and cannot be. impeded. c. The aforementioned steep slope comprising the back 2+ acres of their property is obviously primarily unusable. 4. There are more suitable places the Islamic Center can acquire to build a Mosque. I urge the Council and Planning Commission to deny this request and to suggest to the Islamic Center that they should look for a location more conducive to their needs. (You may recall that this Mayor Comerchero, City Council, and Planning Commission Wednesday, July 7, 2010 Page 2 happened with the Rancho Community Church some years ago, when 2 or 3 different locations they had proposed to build on were turned down until they found their present location.) Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Wm. Rench Pastor, Calvary Baptist Church 31087 Nicolas Rd. Temecula, CA 92591 P.S. We never received any notice of this hearing from the Islamic Center or the Planning Commission. We were required to provide notice to all surrounding properties when we built some years ago. I believe that this is still a requirement, isn't it? P.P.S. We did not have the email addresses for the Planning Commission. If possible, could you please forward this letter on to the Planning Commission? Thank you for your help in this matter. From; Jennycartell@aol.com [mallto:Jennycartell@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:31 AM To: Mike Nagger Cc. julie.don2©verizon.net; adelegaryh@msn.com; plynes@gmail.com Subject Fwd: Mosque at Ground Zero -where is the media? FOR MIKE FROM JENNY Dear Councilman Nagger This is what we will be doing to our neighborhood in Temecula if we build the mosque. Is there anything we can do to fight this? Noise ordinance eventually but they will build the Minaret after they have gotten the other approved and started just as they are doing in Corona and other cities. Check out the newsletter that they put out with total hatred for American. our history, presidents and our way of life. You will get to them by googling "Mosque- Corona". I would definitely say their language is inciting violence. The call to worship 5 times per day will shock many people. God Bless You, Jenny C. From: aidalem@sbcgiobal.net To: aidalem (Psbcglobat.net Sent 7/41201011:05:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time Subj: Mosque at Ground Zero -where is the media? Did you see anything about this protest in NYC regarding this mosque? 1 didn't!!! How in the name of God can this be allowed. What a sad commentary to the people who died on Sept. 11, 2001! Stop the Mosque at Ground Zero Part II June 16, 2010, New York, N.Y. , - by El Marco Americans Stand Up Against Radical Islam in New York - We Will Not Submit! Not one major network sent a satellite truck or camera crew to this event. Without bloggers this newsworthy event would have remained unknown to the public and history On Sunday, June 6th, a multi-ethnic, multi -racial coalition of Americans opposed to Islamic violence and intolerance rallied at the site of the World Trade Center in New York City. 9/11 families were joined by immigrants from India, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Africa, Iran and Europe to show opposition to the construction of a mega-mosque at Ground Zero. Others flew in from overseas to speak or just to share their particular ethnic communities' experiences at the hands of Muslims. orId The WIC c ter Tmn5partzition These are parents and spouses of firefighters trilled on 9/11. The rally took place just a minute's walk from Ladder 10 Firehouse, where their Loved ones were stationed for duty that terrible day. Ladder 10 Lost seven firefighters. Crowd estimates ranged from 5,000 (NYPD) to 10,000. The crowd overflowed the police barrier enclosures that ran the full length of two city blocks. This photo shows the enclosure in front of the stage at the intersection of Liberty and Church Streets. The second enclosure ran the length of the next block and can be seen on the other side of the traffic lights. Thousands of additional participants filled the treed area of Zuccotti Park . Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller are the founders of STOP ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICA, which sponsored the rally. Ms. Geller is a citizen journalist and blogger who runs the human rights web site Atlas Shrugs. Mr. Spencer is the author of several books on Islam and head of the influential web site Jihad watch. Pamela Geller: "Ground Zero is a war memorial, Ground Zero is a burial ground. We are asking for sensitivity.It is unconscionable to build a shrine to the very ideology that inspired the jihadist attacks at Ground Zero, right there. We are asking the imam Rauf and Daisy Khan to be sensitive. For mutual respect and mutual understanding that is demanded of us every day. There's a hair-trigger sensitivity in the Muslim world, you can't run the cartoons, you can't say Mohammed, this is offensive. This is an offensive mosque. To build a shrine, an Islamic flag of conquest on the sacred ground the cherished site, of a conquered land. This is historic, this is Islamic history. It's what they do. The St. Sofia in Turkey, the al-Quds, at the holiest Jewish site in Israel . Not here. This is where we take a stand. We must take a stand. We must say no." I do not believe that the landmarks commission controlled by Mayor Bloomberg, is going to stop this mosque. It's not going to happen. Here's Omar Muhamedi, on his humanrights council, a CAIR lawyer, who sued the airlines and the Jane and John Does that saw something and said something on those airplanes, if you remember. That's who's on his human rights commission. It ain't gonna happen with Bloomberg. We have to make it happen. You have to get involved." (Pamela Geller) Police enclosure on left, with crowd flowing out of park on right. The new Tower 7 and World Trade Center site are in the background. The green tent, center, is located immediately behind the stage. Port Authority and NYPD officers kept watch over the rally and were well aware of the need for heightened security at this event. One of their own Port Authority officers, WTC Sergeant Alan T. De Vona was on duty at the World Trade Center on 9/11, 2001, and was one of the first to help victims of the terrorist attack. He spoke these words to the SIOA rally: "It's almost nine years. I'm hoping that America is watching. I'm hoping that America is remembering. Because, make no mistake. September 11 was an act of war. And thank the military that has lost almost 5,000 troops from that day, defending us. I don't know what to say to jar America 's memory. I want America to remember. Port Authority Police and FDNY firefighters are seen here gathered beneath this banner. The issues at stake will certainly affect the heart of American freedom, democracy, cultural values and tolerance. America is a tolerant country that allows for the free worship of all its citizens. But our tolerance has limits. Do we have to tolerate intolerant Islamic ideology and Muslims who preach intolerant Islam?" Hindu human rights activists Narain Kataria, Prasad Yalamanchi and unidentified friend came front Mississippi and Chicago with banners and flyers highlighting the radical statements of imam Rauf and his jihadist roots. 13 _ 14 15 16 Stephen Dyer and Gary Jules journalism students at York College, with Pamela Geller. Not one major network sent a satellite truck or camera crew to this event. Without bloggers this newsworthy event would have remained unknown to the public and history. Pamela Geller is greeted by Hindu human rights activists Prasad Yalamanchi and Narain Kataria. Bhupinder Singh Bhurji, Pamela Geller, and Robert Spencer. Singh Bhurji is the president of the NAMDHARI SIKH FOUNDATION. The foundation is a member of the Human Rights Coalition Against Radical Islam'(HRCARI). HRCARI is a coalition of Hindus, Sikhs, Christians from Sudan, Egypt and Iraq, moderate Muslims and Jews - who are victims and targets of radical Islam around the globe. He said, at another rally: "Radical Islamists are killing people in India , trying to dominate that nation. And here too they come with violence against "infidels." We are "infidels united," standing together, brown, black and white, against this epoch's fascist movement. Radical Islam wants to dominate entire world. They want everyone to surrender. Islam radical or otherwise. They want to put the Islamic flag on White House." Because of Islamic terrorism, America and the world have seen massive new security measures become a way of life. Anyone openly critical of Islam, or terrorist ideology, must surround themselves with security, or live in hiding. Those courageous enough to confront Islamism are criticized by the cowards and appeasers of the left wbo seek safety by supporting the enemy. Moderate Muslims were silent when Theo van Gogh was brutally murdered in Amsterdam , just as moderate Muslims in the United States are generally reluctant to speak out against violent Islam. Moderate Muslims also face great danger in speaking out. Geller and Spencer will press on despite the danger. They hope to inspire Americans to stand up and say enough of political correctness and work to stem the galloping Islamization of America and Europe . This message and any enclosures are intended only for the addressee. Please notify the sender by email if you are not the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute this message or its contents or enclosures to any other person and any such actions may be unlawful,_.. Ball reserves the right to monitor and review all messages, and enclosures sent to or from this email address. Patrick Richardson From: Bill & Joanie Hanson [bjhanson7@verizon.net] Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 9:32 PM To: Chuck Washington Subject: Proposed Mosque Dear Sir Please do not allow the building of a mosque in Temecula. I know you value our freedom and beautiful city. No matter what they say, they are out to take over and enslave America. I doubt you would want this for yourself or you family. Yes, some are peaceful people, but the Mosque's are breeding grounds for the militant. I am sure my feelings reflect most of Temecula population. Thank you for taking a stand. Joanie and Bill Hanson 1 Original Message From: Sandy Handzlik [mailto:shandzlik@mtpalomar.netj Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 9:16 AM To: Maryann Edwards Subject: Dog Park on Redhawk Parkway and Mosque Dear Counilmember Edwards, 1. Dog Park on Redhawk Parkway I am writing to express my dismay that the dog park on Redhawk Parkway has not been reopened, The original signs, as 1 recalled, said lune 1 was the reopening date. It does not take that long to regrow grass and, my opinion, the park was fine the way it was. What is taking so long? If you can't afford to redo it then just open it back up. This is a very popular park not just for dogs but for families. 2. Mosque to be built in Eastern Temecula I an writing to express my concerns about the Mosque being bunt in Eastern Temecula. My concern is the call to prayer three times a day over a loudspeaker which can be heard for miles around which will disturb many homeowners in the area. The noise ordinance should not be waived for their call to prayer since other churches must abide by existing statute. Please respond to my concerns. Thanks you, Leonard and Sandra Handzlik 951/763-2737 Shandzliknntoalomar.net Heads up Folks.... Proposed: Mosque to be built on Nicolas Rd. in Temecula, next to Baptist Church. It is going to be approximately 25,000 sq.. ft., two stories tall, complete with minarets (which will stand taller), to blare their declarations s times a dav, startinga 4. AM and ending at Q is PM (will be heard for miles) and a separate building. On Fridays the traffic will be. exponentially increased as they are required to attend prayers that and will be a gathering: place for the lslamic Fundamentalists (Muslims) for miles around. The cityhad no intention of notifying anyone in surrounding neighborhoods, except by announcement in the paper! Hearings are tentatively scheduled for Aug. 18% Coo pm (check city agenda to make sure date has not been changed) at 43200 Business Drive Park (City Hall), Temecula and lend your voice and/or your presence: so that we can stop this from happening. Once they get a foothold, they will bring will expect dispensation in our governance and accommodations in the schools including the tea s ' s _ of Islam! (fired in Hemet) This is a radically intolerant belief system that is incompatible with the freedoms. guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. This is not a'freedom •of religion' issue. Freedom is a concept incompatible with the ofthe Koran.. lt.is.an i` a e e*with a manifesto ::.., -_ �.-. i a � vert, or be killed. This is a hearing butthere will be opportunitiesfor folks to line up and Speak Prepare a statement that is rid: and to the point. We will . not surrender to political correctness! For petition and information contact us at.... temeculamosque@gmaa.com `The natural attitude .of a Muslim to the infidel world mustbe one ofd `V s � and auusiou_ =Koran. Great Blow http_f/www.iihadwatch_orp/ http_ /atllasshrucs2000.typepad_carn/ Cd) 0 F-1 can g4r WA 04o 0 gla w ox zz z wa 0 05 05 •w E Piz -' ch .l U 1-4 CI A .0 150 0.4 V o CO 0 0 71 i--- —J>--- ..:E CI CD . a Lll E 0 07 • ... — = F„ .1 e 1.... Cari • a ] ) i , C. 1=• ILI ' ' - 1.14 cb V: • ,,, +J. -a 51 4 -4 Eric Jones From: Patrick Richardson Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 9:10 AM To: Shawn Nelson Cc: Bob Johnson; Aaron Adams; Grant Yates; Andre OHarra; Eric Jones Subject: FW: Monday morning- Richie's -Murrieta- 8:30 AM -The Story of Emma's Political Asylum Below is the email regarding the demonstration scheduled for Friday. An Islamic Mosque is planned to be built in Temecula Silent Majority Silent No More! We will not be Submissive! We are holding a Singing — Praying - Patriotic rally on Friday on the side of the road on Rio Nedo in Temecula. Our voices are going to be heard! Bring your Bibles, Flags, Signs, Dogs and Singing. Voices. July 30, 2010 12:30 am to 1:30 pm 'ISLAMIC CENTER TECU A VA:..,Y 42188 Rio Nedo, Suite A Temecula, CA 92590 if you bring your dog, please bring a pooper scooper too. Tell your friends, family and and neighbors. God Bless America! Silent Majority Silent No More! We will not be Submissive! An Islamic Mosque is planned to be built in Temecula Islam is nota religion. It is a worldwide political movement meant on domination of the world. And it is meant to subjugate all people under Islamic law. In the Quran, it says it very clearly. There are two spheres. One is the Dar al-Harb, which is the realm of war. The other is Dar al -Islam, which is that part that's under submission to Islam. There is no middle ground. You're either at war or you're under submission. Now, that's the way they think. The Arabic word 'Islam' simply means 'submission', and derives from a word meaning 'peace'. In a religious context it means complete submission to the will of God. 'Allah' is the Arabic name for God, which is used by Arab Muslims and Christians alike. Islam permits lying! It is called "Al-taqiyya." Al-tagiyya means dissimulation Muslims are permitted to lie: (1) to save their lives, (2) to reconcile a husband and wife, (3) to persuade a woman into a bedroom and (4) to facilitate one on his journey. Muslims are even permitted to disavow Islam and Mohammed if it is not a genuine heart -felt rejection. Muslims will tell you that concealment of a truth is not an abandonment of that truth if it benefits Islam. We are holding a Singing — Praying - Patriotic rally on Friday on the Sidewalk on Rio Nedo in Temecula. The Islam's treat women as second class people and they also hate dogs. Women are forbidden to sing -and dogs are killed. We will not be submissive to Sharia Law. Tennessee was able to stop the Mosque so bring your Bibles, flags, signs, dogs and singing voice on Friday: July 30, 2010. 12:30 am to 1:30 p.m ISLAMIC CENTER OF E TLA 42188 Rio Nedo, Suite A Temecula, CA 92590 ***************************************************************** 2 Report on the Roots of Violent Islamist Extremism and Efforts to Counter It: The Muslim Brotherhood Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs July 10, 2008 Steven Emerson Executive Director Investigative Project on Terrorism stopterror ar,aol.com www.investigativeproj ect.org ntroduction: ---" Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, the security apparatuses of United States have dedicated themselves to combating Islamist terrorism and countering its roots. These efforts have been met with varying levels of success. Operationally, the U.S. has been largely successful — thwarting terrorist attacks against the homeland and hardening American targets abroad. However, the primary driver of the violence — ideology -- has not been successfully countered or even sufficiently understood. The roots of this ideology are diverse and diffuse, but the primary root of Sunni Islamist violence in the modern era is the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood (al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun)1 was founded as an Islamic revivalist movement in the Egyptian town of Isma'iliyaa in March 1928 by school teacher Hassan al-Banna (1.906-1949).2 The vast majority of Sunni terrorist groups — including al Qaeda, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad — are derived from the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood's goal has been to promote the impletnentation of Shari Yah (Islamic law derived from the Quran and the Sunnah).3 Early in its history, the Brotherhood focused on education and charity. It soon became heavily involved in politics and remains a major player on the Egyptian political scene, despite the fact that it is an illegal organization. The movement has grown exponentially, from only 800 members in 1936, to over 2 million in 1948, to its current position as a pervasive international Sunni Islamist movement, with covert and overt branches in over 70 countries. "I did not want to enter into competition with the other orders," al-Banna once said. "And I did not want it to be confined to one group of Muslims or one aspect of Islamic reform; rather I sought that it be a general message based on learning, education, andjihad."4 According to al-Banna, "It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.i5 That helps explain the Muslim Brotherhood's motto: "Allah ghayatuna Al-rasul za'imuna. Al -Qur- 'an dusturuna. Al jihad sabiluna. Al-mawtfi sabil Allah asma amanina. Allah akbar, Allah akbar." ("God is our goal, the Quran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, struggle [jihad] is our way, and death in the service of God is the loftiest of our wishes. God is great. God is great.")6 They are also known as the Muslim Brothers, The Brothers (al-Ikhwan), or the Society of Muslim Brothers (Jama'at al-Ikhwan al Muslimun). 2 Born in Mahmoudiyya, Egypt, Hassan al -Barna was the son of the prominent Imam Sheikh Ahmad al- Banna. He studied at Al-Ahzar University and joined a Sufi order there. He then moved to Cairo as a school teacher in 1932 establishing the Muslim Brotherhood branch there. Al -Banns was assassinated by the Egyptian government on February 12th, 1949 as part of an Egyptian government crackdown on the Brotherhood. 3 Sharia'h is the body of Islamicreligious law. It is primarily based on the Quran and the Sunnah. 4 Hassan al -Barna, quoted in, Richard P. Mitchell, The Society of Muslim Brothers (New York City: Oxford University Press, 1,969), p. 207. 5 Fercydoun Hoveryda, The Broken Crescent, (Westport, CT: Praegar Publishers, 2002), p. 56. 6 Richard P. Mitchell, The Society of Muslim Brothers (New York City: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 193-4. www.investigativeproject.org filie Brotherhood has reached global status, wielding power and influence in almost every state with a Muslim population. Additionally, the Brotherhood maintains political parties in many Middle-Eastern and African countries, including Jordan, Bahrain, Tunisia, Algeria, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, and even Israel. The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood attempted to overthrow the Syrian government in the 1980s, but the revolt was crushed. Aside from the Muslim Brotherhood in Israel proper, the terrorist organization Hamas was founded as the Palestinian chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, Article II of the Hamas charter states: The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine. Moslem Brotherhood Movement is a universal organization which constitutes the largest Islamic movement in modem times. It is characterized by its deep understanding, accurate comprehension and its complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgment, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult and conversion to Islam.? Since its founding, the Muslim Brotherhood has openly sought to reassert Islam through the establishment of Sunni Islamic governments that will rule according to the strict and specific tenets of Shari'ah. To the Brotherhood, this is the correct primary endeavor of human civilization, with the ultimate goal being the unification of these regimes under the banner of the Caliphate -- or universal Islamic state. According to al-Banna, the Caliphate must govern all lands that were at one time under the control of Muslims. He stated: We want the Islamic flag to be hoisted once again on high, fluttering in the wind, in all those lands that have had the good fortune to harbor Islam for a certain period of time and where the muzzein's call sounded in the takbirs and the midis_ Then fate decreed that the light of Islam be extinguished in these lands that returned to unbelief. Thus Andalusia, Sicily, the Balkans, the Italian coast, as well as the islands of the Mediterranean, are all of them Muslim Mediterranean colonies and they must return to the Islamic fold. The Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea must once again become Muslim seas, as they once were.8 Onee that is accomplished, the Caliphate is to be expanded to cover the entire globe, erasing national boundaries under the flag of Islam. This concept was elucidated by the Brotherhood luminary, Sayyid Qutb, who wrote in his seminal work, Milestones (1964), that Muslims are not merely obliged to wage jihad in defense of Islamic lands, but must "The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement," The Avalon Project at Yale Law School, August 18, i.988, http:I/www,Yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/hamas.htm (Accessed June 9, 2008). 8 Hassan al-Banna, quoted in: Caroline Fourest, Brother Tariq: The Doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan (Encounter Books, 2008), p. 19. www. investigativeproject.org • ale offensive jihad in order to liberate the world from the servitude of man-made law d governance.9 Organizational Structure: The Muslim Brotherhood used activism, mass communication, and sophisticated governance to build a large support base within the lower class and professional elements of Egyptian society. By using existing support networks built around mosques, welfare associations, and neighborhood groups, the Brotherhood was able to educate and indoctrinate people in an Islamic setting. The organization is headed by a Supreme Guide or Secretary General and is assisted by a General Executive Bureau (Maktab aI Irshad), and a constituent assembly known as the Shura Council. There have been six Secretaries General of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood,'° which is widely seen as the leading branch of the worldwide organization. Ideology: The Muslim Brotherhood seeks to restore the historical Caliphate and then expand its authority over the entire world, dismantling all non -Islamic governments. The Brotherhood aims to accomplish this through a combination of warfare — both violent and political. The Muslim Brotherhood has provided the ideological model for almost all modem Sunni Islamic terrorist groups. When discussing Hamas, Al Qaeda, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Richard Clarke — the chief counterterrorism adviser on the U.S. National Security Council under Presidents Clinton and Bush - told a Senate committee in 2003 that "The common link here is the extremist Muslim Brotherhood — all of these organizations are descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brothers." 11 The leadership of Al Qaeda, from Osama bin Laden to his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri and 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed all were influenced by Muslim Brotherhood ideology.12 In fact, al-Zawahiri was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood as a young man, but he broke with them when his terrorist career began. He later wrote a book called The Bitter Harvest in which he condemned the Brotherhood for neglecting jihad in favor of participating in elections.13 The Brotherhood's ideology was formulated by its two main luminaries: its founder, Hassan al -Banns — who was assassinated by agents of the Egyptian government in 1949 — and Sayyid Qutb, hanged in 1966. 9 Sayyid Qutb, Milestones. 1° The six Secretaries General of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt are: Hassan al -Baena (1928-1949), Hassan Ismail al-Hudaybi (1951-1973), Omar al-Telrnesany (1976-1986), Muhammed Hamid Abu al-Nasr (1986-1996), Mustafa Mashour (1996-2002), Ma'atnun al-Hodeiby (2002-2004), and current Ieader Mohammed Mandi Akef. 11 Statement of Richard A. Clarke before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, October 22, 2003. 12 Lt. Col. (res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi, "The Muslim Brotherhood: A Moderate Islamic Alternative to al-Qaeda or a Partner in Global Jihad?" Jerusalem Viewpoints, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, November 1, 2007. 13 Raymond Ibrahim, The Al Qaeda Reader (Doubleday: New York, 2007), p. 116. www. i nvestig ativeproject. org At-Banna once described the Brotherhood as, "a Salafiyya message, a Sunni way, a Sufi truth, a political organization, an athletic group, a cultural -educational union, an economic company, and a social idea." 14 While studying in Cairo, al-Banna had become immersed in the writings of Rashid Rida (1865-1935), Muhammad Abduh (1849-1905) and Jamal al -Din al -Afghani (1839-1897), who formed the backbone of the Salafiyya Movement.15 Al-Banna agreed with their ideas that Islam provided the solution to the afflictions plaguing Muslim society. Specifically, in accordance with Salafism, he called for a return to what he perceived to be true Islam. Salafism is an austere form of Islam within the Sunni sect that attempts to return to what its adherents believe to be unadulterated Islam as practiced by Muhammad and his companions. In order to achieve this, Salafists strip out what they see as 'bida, or innovations, from the practice of Islam as it has developed over the centuries. According to Salafists, only pure Islam can solve the political, economic, social, domestic, and external issues of the Muslim nation (urnmah). As such, Muslim societies should be governed according to Shari'ah. While al-Banna drew almost exclusively on early Islamic doctrine in his works, it is also important to understand the strong anti-colonialism sentiments driving his ideology. Al- Banna was writing and working at a time when European powers had colonized the Middle East. Jihad, death, and martyrdom have been lauded throughout the history of the Brotherhood, not only as a means to achieve the above goals, but as an end unto itself. In his seminal work, The Society of Muslim Brothers, Robert P. Mitchell the late University of Michigan Professor of Near Eastern History, quotes and paraphrases al-Banna: The certainty that jihad had this physical connotation is evidenced by the relationship always implied between it and the possibility, even the necessity, of death and martyrdom. Death, as an important end of jihad, was extolled by Banna in a phrase which came to be a famous part of his legacy: "the art of death" (faun al-mawt), "Death is art" (al -maws faun). The Qur'an has commanded people to love death more than life. Unless "the philosophy of the Qur'an on death" replaces "the love of life" which has consumed Muslims, then they will reach naught. Victory can only come with the mastery of "the art of death." In another place, Banna reminds his followers of a Prophetic observation: "He who dies and has not fought [ghaza; literally: raided] and was not resolved to fight, has died ajahiliyya [ignorance of divine guidance] death." The movement cannot succeed, Banna insists, without this dedicated and unqualified kind ofjihad.16 14 Hassan al-Banna, quoted in, Mitchell, Society of Muslim Brothers, p. 14. 15 The term Salafyyah comes from the phrase as-salaf as-saliheen or "pious predecessors" of early the Muslim community, referring primarily to Muhammad's companions (sahaba). 16 Mitchell, Society. of Muslim Brothers, p. 207. www. i nvestig ativep ro ject.org :jihad is a central tenet in the Muslim Brotherhood ideology. In a booklet entitled, -'-;`Jihad" and in other works, al-Banna clearly defines jihad as violent warfare against non - `Muslims to establish Islam as dominant across the entire world. He wrote: Jihad is an obligation from Allah on every Muslim and cannot be ignored nor evaded. Allah has ascribed great importance to jihad and has made the reward of the martyrs and fighters in His way a splendid one. Only those who have acted similarly and who have modeled themselves upon the martyrs in their performance ofjihad can join them in this reward.l7 To support his assertions about jihad, al-Banna quotes extensively from the Quran, the Hadith, and great Islamic scholars. These quotes either define jihad as fighting and/or emphasize the obligatory nature ofjihad. On the specific subject of "fighting with People of the Book [Jews and Christians]," 18 al-Banna quotes Quran 9:29 the infamous sword verse: Fight against those who believe not in Allah nor in his Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger and those who acknowledge not the Religion of Truth (i.e. Islam), from among the People of the Book, until they pay the jizya [poll tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. Al-Banna quotes a Hanafi scholar: Jihad linguistically means to exert one's utmost effort in word and action; in the Sharee'ah it is the fighting of the unbelievers, and involves all possible efforts that are necessary to dismantle the power of the enemies of Islam including beating them, plundering their wealth, destroying their places of worship and smashing their idols.19 Al-Banna continues: Islam allows jihad and permits war until the following Qur'anic verse is fulfilled: "We will show them Our signs in the universe, and in their own selves, until it becomes manifest to them that this (the Qur'an) is the truth" (Surat al-Fussilat (41), ayah 53)20 In conclusion, al-Banna writes: "Hassan al-Banna, "Jihad," htto://www.voungmuslims.ca/online library/books/jihad/ (Accessed June 9, 2008). 1 A1-Banna, "Jihad." 19 Ibid. 20 ibid. www.investigativeproject.org My brothers! The ummah [Islamic community] that knows how to die a noble and honourable death is granted an exalted life in this world and eternal felicity in the next. Degradation and dishonour are the results of the love of this world and the fear of death. Therefore prepare for jihad and be the lovers of death.21 To ensure that the Shari 'ah would be the "the basis controlling the affairs of state and society,"22 al-Banna laid out a seven -step hierarchy of goals to be implemented by the Brotherhood for the Islamization of society. The first step is to educate and "form" the Muslim person. From there the Muslim person would spread Islam and help "form" a Muslim family. Muslim families would group together to form a Muslim society that would establish a Muslim government. The government would then transform the state into an Islamic one governed by Shari 'ah, as voted by the Muslim society. This Islamic state would then work to free "occupied" Muslim lands and unify them together under one banner, from which Islam could be spread all over the world. As Mitchell explains, quoting original Brotherhood sources, these goals would be carried out in three stages. Starting with "the first stage through which all movements must pass, the stage of `propaganda, communication, and information."'23 In this stage, the Brotherhood would recruit and indoctrinate core activists. The next stage consists of "formation, selection, and preparation."24 In this stage, the Brothers would endear themselves to the population by creating charities, clinics, schools, and other services. More importantly, they would prepare for the third and final stage: the stage of. "execution." 25 Of this stage, al-Banna stated: At the time that there will be ready, Oh ye Muslim Brothers, three hundred battalions, each one equipped spiritually with faith and belief, intellectually with science and learning, and physically with training and athletics, at that time you can demand of me to plunge with you through the turbulent oceans and to rend the skies with you and to conquer with you every obstinate tyrant. God willing, I will do it.26 Qutb and Jahiliyya In addition to al-Banna's founding philosophy, the works of Sayyid Qutb (1909-1966) also had a major impact on the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. Beyond that, Qutb's books sent shockwaves throughout the entire Islamic world. His most influential 21 Ibid. 22 "The Principles of the Muslim Brotherhood" 1.khwanWeb.Org, Official Muslim Brotherhood Website (Cached), http://64.233.169.104/search?q= cache:2 Lj7AHYW7oI:www.muslimbrotherhood.co.uk/Hoine.asp%3F1D %3D4584%26Lang%3DE%26Press%3DShow%26System%3DPressR%26zpage%3DSystems+%22the+b asis+controll ing+the+affairs+of+state+and+society%22+ISLAMIC&hl»en&ct—clnk&cd=9&gl=us 23 Mitchell, Society of Muslim Brothers, p. 13. 24 Risalat Al-Mu'tamar al-khamis (Message of the Fifth Congress), quoted in Mitchell, Society of Muslim Brothers, p. 14. zs Ibid, 15. 26 Ibid. www.investigativeproject.org orks were Fi zilal al -Qur'an ("In the Shade of the Quran")27 and Ma'alim fz al -Tariq `Milestones"). Milestones has come to be Qutb's most popular work and has influenced ---- ' Islamic extremists such as Ayman al-Zawahiri,28 Dr. Abdullah Azzam, 29 and Osama bin Laden.3o Written while Qutb was in prison in Egypt,3' Milestones' central thesis was that the world had degraded into a state of ignorance (as existed before the Prophethood of Mohammad) orjahiliyya.32 He proposed that the overthrow of apostate rulers and the establishment of Islamic societies worldwide though offensive jihad is the only way to solve this state of affairs. In addition to Hassan al-Banna's ideas, Qutb was heavily influenced by the writings of Indian Islamist Sayyid Mawlana Abul Ala Maududi (1903- 1979)33 and the medieval scholar Taqi ad -Din Ahmad Ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328). However, Qutb expanded on their ideas ofjahiliyyah and jihad. As the 9/11 Commission Report found, Qutb came to the U.S. to study in the late 1940s: Qutb returned with an enormous loathing of Western society and history. He dismissed Western achievements as entirely material, arguing that Western society possesses "nothing that will satisfy its own conscience and justify its existence." Three basic themes emerge from Qutb's writings. First, he claimed that the world wasbeset with barbarism, licentiousness, and unbelief (a condition he called jahiliyya, the religious term for the period of ignorance prior to the revelations given to the Prophet Mohammed). Qutb argued that humans can choose only between Islam and jahiliyya. Second, he warned that more people, including Muslims, were attracted to jahiliyya and its material comforts than to his view of Islam; jahiliyya couldtherefore triumph over Islam. Third, no middle 27 This work, written while Qutb was languishing in an Egyptian jail cell (1954-1964), is a 30 volume commentary (tafsir) on the Quran. A highly popular work, Qutb in his commentary advocates for shari'ah to be implemented in all Muslim societies. It also contains significant amounts of vitriol directed primarily at Jews. 26 Zawahiri, also a member of the Brotherhood since the age of fourteen (1965) became familiar with Qutb's writings while he was in Saudi Arabia. There he came under the tutelage of Sayyid's brother Muhammad Qutb, who fled Egypt in 1972 and began teaching his brother's philosophy while a professor at King Abdel -Aziz University in Jeddah and the Unun al-Qura University in Mecca. Osama Bin Laden also reportedly attended Muhammad Qutb's lectures there too. 17 Jim Landers, "Muslim Extremists Justify Violence on Way to Restoring Divine Law," Dallas Morning News, November 3, 2001. 30 The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States 31 Qutb spent ten years in prison from 1954 to 1964 after being arrested for being a member of the Brotherhood (he joined in 1953) when Nasser outlawed the organization in 1954. Milestones was published when Qutb emerged from prison in 1965, even though Qutb was arrested and jailed again for preaching for an Islamic state in Egypt. He was executed on August 29th, 1966 with excerpts from Milestones used against him during his trial. After his execution he became a "Martyr" (Shaheed) to his followers. 32 Jahiliyyah can be loosely translated as a state of `ignorance of divine guidance" referring to the conditions in pre -Islamic Arabian society before the revelations of the Quran by Allah and the Prophet Muhammad. 33 Also written as Maududi, Maudoodi, or Mawdudi. He founded the Pakistani Islamic group Jamaat-e- Islami in 1941 with the goal of establishing an Islamic state in South Asia. He headed the party until 1973 and was well known for his writings on Islam. www. investigativeproject.org ground exists in what Qutb conceived as a struggle between God and Satan. All Muslims—as he defined them—therefore must take up arms in this fight. Any Muslim who rejects his ideas is just one more nonbeliever worthy of destruction.34 While both Maududi and Ibn Taymiyyah used jahiliyya to describe some contemporaries, Qutb described the whole of the Muslim community to be in jahiliyya, as "the Muslim community has long ago vanished from existence."35 Since Arab secular leaders did not follow the Shari 'ah, they were considered to be in apostasy for violating God's sovereignty (al-hakimniyya) on earth. In fact, "any place where the Shari 'ah is not enforced and where Islam is not dominant becomes the Abode of War (Dar-ul-Harb)."36 Jahilryyah now included all states, whether ruled by Muslims or not. To achieve his vision, Qutb advocated for the creation of a vanguard (tali 'a), whose members would model themselves after the Prophet Muhammad's companions. This vanguard would then fight jahiliyya and its influences through methods of preaching (claw 'a) and persuasion for reforming ideas and beliefs; and it uses physical power and Jihad for abolishing the organizations and authorities of the jahili system which prevents people from reforming their ideas and beliefs but forces them to obey their erroneous ways and make them serve human lords instead of the Almighty Lord.37 According to his vision, the vanguard would not "compromise with the practices of jahili society, nor can we be loyal to it," Qutb wrote. "Jahili society, because of its jahili characteristics (described as evil and corrupt), is not worthy to be compromised with."38 Qutb's jihad against Dar al-Harb (Abode of War),39 was not only to protect the Dar al - Islam (Abode of Islam) but also to enhance it and spread it "throughout the earth to the whole of mankind."4° Adherence to Shari 'ah would free mankind from the jahiliyyah influences. This war would not be temporary, "but an eternal state, as truth and falsehood cannot co -exist on this earth. "41 The Brotherhood Today: While many Muslim Brotherhood branches around the world claim to have embraced democracy, the philosophies developed by Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb still carry 34 National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (New York: Norton, 2004), p. 51. 35 Qutb, Sayyid. Milestones. (Syria: Damascus, Dar al-rirn), 9. 36 Ibid., 124. 37 Ibid., 55. 36 Ibid., 21. 39 The Dar al-Harb (Abode of War) traditionally is considered to be countries and places where Islam is not predominant or areas not ruled by Muslims. 40 Milestones, 72. 41 Ibid., 66. www.investigativeproject.org great influence within the organization. The Brotherhood continues to be driven by al- anna's belief that Islam is destined to eventually dominate the world. The -- Brotherhood's declared principles remain steadfast even today. According to their website, the Brotherhood seeks, "the introduction of the Islamic Shari'ah as the basis controlling the affairs of state and society" and "unification among the Islamic countries and states...liberating them from foreign imperialism."42 This includes "spreading Islamic concepts that reject submission to humiliation, and incite to fighting it" while "reviving the will of liberation and independence in the people, and sowing the spirit of resistance."43 Some have contended that there is a "moderate" wing to the Muslim Brotherhood that can and should serve as a bridge between the Islamic world and the West,44 but this claim has been much disputed in academia and the media. Proponents of this theory claim that beginning with Hassan al-Hudaybi al-Banna's immediate successor as Supreme Guide — the Brotherhood took a moderate turn. Detractors45 note the proponents' lack of background in the subject matter. They also cite the Brotherhood's persistent support of violence, under the rubric of resistance against occupation, and the greater popularity of decidedly immoderate figures like Sayyid Qutb over al-Hudaybi in the modem Brotherhood (Qutb's books can be found in a variety of languages all around the world. The same cannot be said for al-Hudaybi's). One scholar has questioned whether al-Hudaybi even penned the moderate volume, Preachers, Not Judges, that has been credited to him, raising the possibility that the Egyptian intelligence service played a role in its production.46 In the fall of 2007, the Brotherhood issued its first official platform in decades. The platform explains, in plain terms, the agenda of the Brotherhood in Egypt and the Islamic world. It calls for: "Spreading and deepening the true concepts of Islam as a complete methodology that regulates all aspects of life." Here are some other notable excerpts from the platform: - "The intentions of the Islamic Shari'ah which aim for the realization of the important aspects and needs and good achievements in the realm of religion and spirit and the self and property and intellect and wealth represent the 42 "The Principles of the Muslim Brotherhood" IkhwanWeb.Org, Official Muslim Brotherhood Website (Cached), htto://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:2 Li7AtlyW7awww.muslimbrotherhood.co.uk/Horne.asp%3FID %3D45 84%26Lang%3DE%o26Press%3DShow%26System%3DPressR%26zPage%3DSvstems+-%22the+b asis+controlling±the-+-a£fairs+of+state+and+society%22+iSLAMIC&h1=en&ct=clnk&cd=9&gl=us (Accessed June 10, 2008). 3 "Reading into The Muslim Brotherhood's Documents," IkhwanWeb.Org, Official Muslim Brotherhood Website, June 13, 2007, http://www.ikhwanweb.org/Article.asp?ID=818&LeveIID 2&SectionID-116 (Accessed May 29, 2008). 44 Robert S. Leiken and Steven. Brooke, "The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood," Foreign Affairs, March - April 2007. 45 Douglas Farah, Youssef Ibrahim, Patrick. Poole, and others. 46 Barbara Zollner, "Prison Talk: The Muslim Brotherhood's Internal Struggle During Gamal Abdel Nasser's Persecution, 1954-1971" (International Journal of Muddle East Studies, 39, 2007), pp. 411-433. www. i nvestig ativeproject. org ruling policy in the defining of the priorities of the goals and strategic policies." "Islam has developed an exemplary model for a state." "The Islamic methodology aims to reform the state of limited capabilities to make it into a strong Islamic state..." Whatever moderating stance the platform takes, in August 2004, the Brotherhood issued a public appeal of support for those fighting coalition forces in Iraq,47 and the following month, spiritual guide Yusuf al-Qaradawi issued a fatwa deeming it a religious duty for Muslims to fight America in Iraq.48 The Brotherhood also plays an active role today in promoting terrorism against American interests. The Brotherhood actively supports Hamas to "face the U.S. and Zionist strategy" in the Occupied Territories and supports their "legitimate resistance."49 A November 2007 interview with Brotherhood Supreme Guide Muhammad Mandi Akef shows the group remains committed to violence against those it views as occupiers. Akef, the Supreme Guide, pledged 10,000 fighters for Palestine but said it was up to a government to arm and train them. In the same interview, Akef denied the existence of Al Qaeda: "All these things are American Zionist tricks," Akef said. "The Shi'ites attack one another, the Sunnis attack one another, and the Shi'ites attack the Sunnis. But the Muslim Brotherhood has a principle, which I declared from day one: The Shi'ites and Sunnis are brothers." "I'd like to go back to the issue of Al-Qaeda. There is no such thing as Al- Qaeda. This is an American invention, so that they will have something to fight for..." Interviewer: "What about Osama bin Laden, Al-Zawahiri, and the Islamic State of Iraq?" Akef: "When one man, or two or three, fight this tyrannical global superpower — is it worth anything?"5° Interviewer: "Thousands have carried out attacks in the Iraq in the name of Al-Qaeda..." 47 "The Muslim Brotherhood Movement in Support of Fighting Americans Forces in Iraq," MEMRI Special Dispatch Series, September 3, 2004. 48 "Cleric Says It's Right to Fight U.S. Civilians in Iraq," Reuters, September 2, 2004. A9 "Reading into The Muslim Brotherhood's Documents," IkhwanWeb.Org, Official Muslim Brotherhood Website, June 13, 2007, http://www.ikhwanweb.org/Article.asp?ID=-818&LevelID=2&SectionlD=116 (Accessed May 29, 2008). so Special Dispatch - Jihad & Terrorism Studies Project, MEMRI TV Project, December. 18, 2007. www. i nvestigativeproject.org Akef: "That is a lie. Who says so?" Interviewer: "They do." That argument fits with a theory offered by Lt. Col. (res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi, senior researcher of the Middle East and radical Islam at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He argues that Al Qaeda and the Brotherhood share the same final goal — the establishment of a global Caliphate — but the Brotherhood fears "that an Al-Qaeda attack against the West at this time might hamper the Islamic movement's buildup and focus the West on the threat implicit in Muslim communities."51 Thus, the Muslim Brotherhood and spiritual guide al-Qaradawi condemned al Qaeda's actions in the aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. However, in an interview on May 23, 2008 with the online Arabic news service Elaph, 52 Akef seemed to change his approach. He was asked: "Regarding resistance and jihad, do you consider Osama Bin Laden a terrorist or an Islamic Mujahid?" In response, Akef said, "In all certainty, a mujahid, and I have no doubt in his sincerity in resisting the occupation, close to Allah on high."53 He was then asked about his previous denial about the existence of al Qaeda, and said, "The name is an American invention, but al Qaeda as a concept and organization comes from tyranny and corruption." The interviewer followed with this question: "So, do you support the activities of al Qaeda, and to what extent?" Akef said, "Yes, I support its activities against the occupiers, and not against the people." Two days later, in another interview the Saudi -owned pan -Arab daily Al-Sharq al-Awsat, Akef tried to clarify some of his comments about al Qaeda after receiving criticism from religious and political leaders about his remarks in the May 23 interview. He said: We (the Brotherhood) have nothing to do with al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden... we are against violence except when fighting the occupier...When he thin Laden] fights the occupier then he is a mujahid, and when he attacks civilians, then this is rejected. The word al Qaeda is an American illusion...Bin Laden has a thought ...his thought is based on violence, and we do not approve of violence under any circumstances except one and that is fighting an occupier. We have nothing to do with al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden...we condemn any thought that leads to 51 Lt. Col. (res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi, "The Muslim Brotherhood: A Moderate Islamic Alternative to al-Qaeda or a Partner in Global Jihad?" Jerusalem Viewpoints, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, November 1, 2007. 52 Interview with Mohammad Akef, Elaph, May 23, 2008, http:1165.17.227.80/E1aphWeb/AkhbarKhasa/2008/5/332823.htm (Accessed May 28, 2008). 53 Ibid. www.investigativeproject.org violence. When bin Laden fights the occupier then he is a mujahid, when he attacks the innocent and citizens then this is rejected.54 Al-Qaradawi's condemnation of 9/11 was based on his assertion that the passengers in the plane and the people in the World Trade Center were civilians. However, in an interview on Al Jazeera in 2004, al Qaradawi elaborated on the concept of the civilian: When I was asked, I said that I forbid the killing of civilians. I said that it is permitted to kill only those who fight. Islam forbids killing women, youth, and so on. I said so openly, but I asked, "Who is a civilian?" When engineers, laborers, and technicians enter [Iraq] with the American army, are they considered civilians? Is a fighter only the one inside the tank or also the one servicing it? I am speaking of the interpretation of the word "civilian".55 By this logic, it can be argued that anyone providing support to a military force in a Muslim country - whether it be a tank mechanic, a worker at a defense factory, or even an American taxpayer — is no longer considered a civilian. In June 2008, Mohammad Habib, the first deputy chairman of the Muslim Brotherhood, sat down with an interviewer from Al Ahrar, an Egyptian daily. In the long interview, Habib spoke to the international Muslim Brotherhood: AI-Ahrar: But what about the view that the Muslim Brotherhood will perish in the coming twenty years? Dr. Habib: On the contrary, I see that the future is ours, and we will reach our aspirations. The group is gaining every day more territories and a depth in the consciousness of the Egyptian people. Add to this, the group is not confined to Egypt, it has offshoots in various countries all over the world, it continuously grows, achieves more successes at all levels. AI -Abrar: What about the international Muslim Brotherhood? Dr. Habib: There are entities that exist in many countries all over the world. These entities have the same ideology, principle and objectives but they work in different circumstances and different contexts. So, it is reasonable to have decentralization in action so that every entity works according to its circumstances and according to the problems it is facing and in their framework. This actually achieves two objectives: First: It adds flexibility to movement. Second: It focuses on action. Every entity in its own country can issue itsown decision because it is more aware of the problems, circumstances and context in which they are working. However, .there is some centralization in some issues. 54 Abd-al-Sattar Ibrahim, "Akif tells Al-Sharq al-Awsat: The Brotherhood is Against Al-Qa'idah Organization Targeting Civilians; Bin Ladin's Thought is Based on Violence" Al-Sharq al-Awsat, May 25, 2008, FROM: BBC Monitoring International Reports. ss Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Al-Jazeera, November 20, 2004. www.investigativeproject.org These entities can have dialogue when there is a common cause that faces Arabs or Muslims over their central issues like the Palestinian cause. At that time, all of them must cooperate for it. I want to confirm that while some see that Palestine caused rifts among the Arabs, we see that this cause is the one for which all Arabs unite.56 The Brotherhood in the West In the United States, the Brotherhood has had an active presence since the 1960s. They have been represented by various organizations such as the Muslim Students' Association (MSA) founded in 1963, the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) 1971, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) 1981, the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) 1981, the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) 1981, the United Association for Studies and Research (UASR) 1989, the American Muslim Council (AMC) 1990, the Muslim American Society .(MAS) 1992, the Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA), the Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) 1994, and others. In fact, nearly all prominent Islamic organizations in the United States are rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood. An internal Brotherhood memorandum, released during the terror -support trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (FILF) trial in July 2007 shows that the Brotherhood's jihad can take more subtle and long range approaches. Dated to May 22, 1991, the memo states: The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and `sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.57 That theme was picked up four years later by al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader, while attending a conference in Toledo, Ohio. Al-Qaradawi has been offered the post of General Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood twice, but has turned it down in favor of building and managing several Islamist organizations in the West and the Middle East associated with the Brotherhood.58 At the Ohio conference, hosted by the Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA), he said, "Our brothers in Hamas, in Palestine, the Islamic resistance, the Islamic Jihad, after all the rest have given up and despaired, the movement of the Jihad brings us back to our faith."59 He later added: 36 "Interview with MB Deputy Chairman in Al Ahrar Daily," IhwanWeb.Org, Official Muslim Brotherhood Website, June 16, 2008, http://www.ikhwanweb.com/Article.asp?Ii=17267&LevellD=1&SectionID=O (Accessed June 17, 2008). 57 U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation, 04 -CR -240 Government exhibit 3-85. 58 Mona El-Ghobashy, "The Metamorphosis of the Egyptian Muslim Brothers," International Journal of Middle East Studies (Cambridge University Press, 2005) p. 385. 59 Yusuf al-Qaradawi, MAYA Conference, 1995, Toledo, Ohio. www.investigativeproject.org What remains, then, is to conquer Rome. The second part of the omen. "The city of Hiraq [once emperor of Constantinople] will be conquered first," so what remains is to conquer Rome. This means that Islam will come back to Europe for the third time, after it was expelled from it twice... Conquest through Datum [proselytizing], that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da'wa_ But the balance of power will change, and this is what is told in the Hadith of Ibn- Omar and the Hadith of Abu- Hurairah: "You shall continue to fight the Jews and they will fight you, until the Muslims will kill them. And the Jew will hide behind the stone and the tree, and the stone and the tree will say: 'Oh servant of Allah, Oh Muslim, this is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him!' The resurrection will not come before this happens." This is a text from the good omens in which we believe.60 Prominent Brotherhood organizations in Europe include the Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organizations, the Muslim Association of Britain, the European Council for Fatwa and Research, the Islamische Gemeinschaft Deutschland (IGD), and the Union des Organisations Islamiques de France (UOIF). Muslim Brotherhood -affiliated organizations in the West have successfully, but disingenuously, positioned themselves as gatekeepers to the Muslim -American community. The underlying goal of these groups is to redefine moderate Islam and to oversee a separation between Western Muslim communities and their secular host societies in order to promote Islamism and reinforce loyalty to the global ummah. Inherent in these goals is a strategy to weaken Western resistance to Islamism. Presenting themselves as the moderate voices of Islam, they have created a narrative to their community that the US government's campaign against terrorism is, rather, a generalized "war against Islam" that must be shunned, discouraged, and monitored. This characterization serves to demonize the efforts of the U.S. government and the West, which ultimately serves to radicalize and alienate Western Muslims. To a large degree, the narrative propagated by these organizations is a corollary of the primary message of radical Islam at large: That there is a conspiracy by the West to subjugate Islam. This self -victimization fuels paranoia that Muslims are being selectively targeted for racist reasons, because of "special interests," or due to anti -Muslim bias in Western foreign policy. This, in turn, inflames self -alienation and degrades any positive connections between Western Muslim communities and their host state. The foundation and histories of these intertwined organizations in America, as well as their actions in the West, should be examined in an effort to shed a light on the radicalizing effect on the local Muslim communities. 60 Ibid. www. investigativeproject. org ile it can be argued that outreach with the Muslim -American community is a iecessary component to a successful counterterrorism strategy, there is absolutely no reason that this outreach has to go through organizations that ascribe to the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. Alternatively, outreach can be performed at the grassroots level and through individuals respected in the Muslim -American community, like doctors and local businessmen, instead of through groups such as CAIR, ISNA, and MAS. Muslim voices which promote accountability, democracy, human rights and freedoms must be elevated and embraced. Short of that, organizations, individuals and institutions in the West and in the Muslim world that are knee-jerk anti-American, and pro -terrorist, or apologists for terrorism, should be denounced and avoided. The U.S. should not seek to embrace or promote the "least worst option" for lack of a better solution. All organizations with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood need to be treated for what they are: fascistic, paternalistic organizations that seek the return of the Caliphate, act as apologists for Islamism and terrorism, and are not prepared to be responsible actors in democratic systems. They will not and cannot support the future pluralistic liberal institutions which much be built throughout the Muslim world in order to strengthen the promotion of democracy. Rather than countering the ideology promoted by the Muslim Brotherhood and the terrorist groups that it has spawned, the U.S. has empowered the Muslim Brotherhood and, by extension, its uncompromising message by reaching out to the group itself in a poorly targeted effort to find allies in the Muslim world. Domestically, government agencies, departments, and officials at the federal, state, and local levels have unwittingly empowered the affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood by making them the dominant focus of their outreach to the Muslim community and thus anointing groups with an extremist bent and a documented ulterior agenda as the gatekeepers to the Muslim -American community. This policy, which continues to this day despite the criminal connections of many of these organizations, can only end in disaster for the interest of the United States both domestically and abroad. Current and future U.S. outreach efforts need to be viewed through this lens, as the promotion and legitimacy of dangerous elements needs to be avoided at all costs, lest we allow short term and short sighted efforts of outreach, that mostly serve our goals only for the sake of appearances, yet do much damage to legitimate and genuine moderates by promoting elements which seek to exclude moderate voices, trump the more important long term needs and goals of the region, and U.S. national security. The Muslim Brotherhood movement should be considered a strategic enemy of the United States. It should be designated as a foreign power and a threat, from a counterintelligence point -of -view, to the national security of the United States. The Muslim Brotherhood has stated clearly that it considers the United States to be its enemy, despite claims by some commentators that there exists a moderate wing of the movement that somehow does not support the movement's core goals -and ideology. www. investig.ativeproject.org Iver the last forty years, the movement that began in 1963 with the MSA has ansformed itself into a network of like-minded organizations most commonly identified by a wide array of acronyms. ISNA grew directly out of MSA. According to Muslim activist lhsan Bagby, who has long been involved in ISNA leadership, "ISNA has always sought inspiration and guidance from the intellectual leaders of the modern Islamic movement (Maududi, Sayyid Qutb, Hasan al-Banna, etc.)" NAIT serves as the financial arm of ISNA and holds the deeds to hundreds of ideologically compatible mosques and Islamic institutions. Groups such as ISNA attract Muslims of all backgrounds to their conferences. Yet, the leadership has remained committed to uphold the values of Islamism, which looks to Islamicize society within the confines of a very specific interpretation. These organizations have been supported by funding from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In 1993, there was a meeting of the Palestine Committee of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America on how to advance the cause of Hamas. As a result of those discussions, three officials from the pro -Hamas, Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) founded the Council of American -Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR's stated mission is "to enhance understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding." By observing the Washington, D.C. based leadership ofCAIR, and some of CAIR's local branch leaders throughout the United States for twelve -years, it has become clear that CAIR has branched out beyond their stated mission. CAIR resources have consistently been utilized to block any action against radicalism. Since its inception, CAIR has intimidated and silenced critics — even fellow Muslims — while spreading disinformation about any who attempt to oppose or compete with them. Personal attacks on reporters, government officials and others who address issues of Islamism are dispatched in lieu of responding substantively to allegations. Almost every time there is a terrorist prosecution or an asset forfeiture of an Islamic charity linked to a terrorist group, CAIR condemns it as a fishing expedition meant to demonize Muslims. These cries often are joined by similar groups, including the Muslim American Society (MAS), an organization identified by a top Muslim Brotherhood leader as one of their own. CAIR does indeed also work to protect the civil liberties of Muslims, an important endeavor, but does so in a way that projects an "us vs. them" mentality to American Muslims, purposefully fomenting isolation from the rest of the country. Despite the known ties of the above mentioned organizations to the Muslim Brotherhood, the U.S. government insists on engaging in "outreach" and dialogue with them. This has led to an almost comical situation in which one side of the Department of Justice labels CAIR as an unindicted coconspirator in what has been alleged to be the biggest case of terrorist fmancing in the history of the Republic while the other side of the Department of Justice meets with CAIR officials and attends CAIR conferences in an effort to perform outreach with the Muslim -American community. www.investigativeproject.org American thinker- Ynnt Article Return to the Article February 02, 2007 Page l of // assWri-, .429low-4 6/eit4hirgitZen"16€:e. AnVb i`c,664-72 5 egi,j Asixtizze,e_ ietot4e,,f-es e/pf/a ex; 7 Hussam Ayloush: Poison Discourse Dispelled 2)65/sss . By Rachel Neuwirth Hussain Ayloush, the director of the California branch of the Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) is fond of comparing Israelis to Nazis and Israel to Nazi Germany. For example, he appeared on a TV talk show during the Hezb'allah- Israel war of 2006 and compared Israel's acts of self-defense following Hezb'allah's attack to Nazi atrocities during World War II. He did not criticize Hezb'allah at all for bombing Israeli territory, killing three Israeli soldiers and capturing two others, even though it was an entirely unprovoked attack. Nor did Ayloush have a word of criticism for the rockets that Hezb'allah rained down indiscriminately on Israeli communities, killing 43 Israeli civilians, some of them Arabs. But Israel's military response to the .attack on its territory and citizens he considered Nazi -like. Ayloush is also fond of labeling anyone who expresses sympathy with Israel a "Zio-Nazi." One of the individuals that he so labeled was myself, in an e-mail to me. Of course, Ayloush is not unusual in this regard among anti -Israel propagandists. The comparison between Israel and Nazi Germany, and between Zionism (meaning Jewish nationalism) and Nazism has been repeated so often by so many "opinion - makers" that millions of people around the world must by now accept it as undisputed fact. But since the Israel -Nazi comparison has become so accepted in Middle East discourse, it is time that we examine it against the facts, in order to dispel this myth. When we do this, the following facts will draw our attention: • The Jewish population of Europe declined from about 8 million people in 1939 to about 2 million people in 1945, after six years of Nazi horror. By way of contrast, the Arab population of Israel has increased from about 160 000 in 1949 to around today. The entire Arab population of Palestine west of the Jordan River was at most 1,300,000 on the eve of Israel's declaration of independence; it is now somewhere between 3,600,000 and 5,000,000, depending on whose statistics you believe. And this total does not even include the millions of Ara�ho live outside of Western Palestine and who claim to be Palestinians. If the Israelis are Nazi -like, why have they allowed, even assisted, the Arab population in the areas under their administration to increase so dramatically? Would Nazis behave like this? • The average life expectancy of an Arab citizen of Israel in 74.6 years -comparable to the average life expectancy of Americans, the world's wealthiest nation and its superpower. The life expectancy of Arabs in Israel has increased by. ears since the state was founded. By way of contrast, the life expectancy of newly born Jews in Nazi -occupied ; Europe was cTose to zero. • Arabs in Israel receive free medical care, government pensions for each and every child they have (and Arab families have very large numbers of children), unemployment benefits and a host of other welfare state benefits, free education in public schools in their own language, and equal opporiunitiesadmissions to all Israeli colleges and universities. Arabs are free to use all Israeli public facilities, such as parks, restaurants, trains and buses, (even though some of them plant bombs on buses). By way of contrast, Jews in Nazi Germany and the Nazi -occupied lands received no public assistance or medical care of any kind, and were not allowed to attend schools, ride buses or trains, enter parks, dine at restaurants, shop at most stores, etc. • Arabs in Israel are free to work in all trades and professions, including the Armyand the police, both of which have high-ranking Arab officers . Jews in Nazi -ruled lands were banned from nearly all trades and professions. Some "half` Jews (or mischlings, as the Nazis called them) were allowed to serve in the Germanarmy, but no "pure-blooded" Jews. • Of the 120 members of the Israeli parliament, thirteen are Arabs. There is an Arab member of the Israeli Supreme Court. Recently, an Arab was appointed to a cabinet post. Of course there were no Jews in the Nazi government. • Arab citizens of Israel, like all Israeli citizens, are able to choose between dozens of political parties and candidates in free and fair elections. Many of these parties are fiercely hostile to the government, and some are even hostile to the State of Israel itself. Of course Jews could not vote in the Nazi state, while other Germans were only allowed to vote http://www.americanthinker.comlprintpagel?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02... 6/24/2010 American Thinker- Print Article for a single Nazi slate. Page 2 of 3 • The Israeli government pays for the Islamic religious education of Israeli Arab children, allows Islamic courts to have jurisdiction over the private affairs of Muslim citizens, and even pays the salaries of Muslim clerics in the mosques, despite the open hostility to Israel of much of the Moslem world. Islamic organizations and preachers in Israel are free to denounce the state of Israel and even to advocate the dissolution of Israel into an Islamic state. This extreme religious tolerance is of course the exact opposite of Nazi policy. The Nazis banned Jewish worship completely and destroyed all synagogues. Christian ministers who refused to toe the government line were imprisoned and sometimes killed. • Arab members of the Israeli parliament have often publicly expressed support for the "struggle" of the Palestinian terrorist organizations against Israel. They have sometimes expressed this support while visiting states at war with Israel, such as Syria and the "Palestinian National Authority." One Arab member of the Israeli parliament urged Palestinians to kill Israeli soldiers but spare Israeli civilians. Another assured his Jewish colleagues in the Knesset (Israel's parliament) that "we will drive you [the Jewish people] out the way we did the Turks and the Crusaders before you." Yet they are not charged with any crime, remain in the Israeli parliament and continue to receive their salaries from the state. In Nazi Germany, any individual, whether in the government or not, who in private expressed sympathy for Germanys wartime enemies was instantly shot, if the Nazis found out about such remarks. No one ever dared publicly to express support for Germanys enemies. • Israel's ultra -free press constantly denounces and ridicules Israeli government leaders, often with sarcasm and vitriol. The press is constantly reporting on scandals and other developments that reflect unfavorably on the government. Military leaders are also frequently criticized. Many journalists express sympathy for Israel's Arab enemies. Of course, no newspapers or radio stations in Nazi Germany were allowed to criticize the government or to report any news that reflected unfavorably on the regime or its leaders. • Israel provides free electricity and free drinking water to millions of Arab residents of the territories governed by the "Palestinian National Authority," even though that "Authority" is openly at war with Israel, and its agents have killed over a thousand Israeli civilians and soldiers. Israel has turned over hundreds of millions of dollars in "taxes" to the Palestinian government, despite its state of war with Israel, and has even volunteered its services in collecting the taxes for the PA for free. Israelis have given thousands of Palestinian Arabs free treatment in Israeli hospitals, even including Palestinian terrorists wounded in gun battles with Israelis, even though the Palestinians pay no taxes to Israel and are overwhelmingly hostile to Israelis. Israel also provides free medical treatment to over a thousand children from throughout the Arab world suffering from severe disabilities, even though they come from countries unfriendly to Israel. No other nation in history has been as generous and forgiving towards its enemies as Israel has been and continues to be. • The Nazis, of course, gave nothing to the people of nations who forcibly resisted thein except death and destruction on a vast scale. They certainly did not provide them with free medical care, water, electricity and "taxes" while they continued to fight the Germans -or even after they had surrendered. For that matter, even the other democracies of the world, besides Israel, have never shown this kind of generosity to their enemies while they continued to wage war against them. Did the United States provide Germans and Japanese with electricity, running water, medical care and food while World War II was still going on? Did it provide the North Koreans or the North Vietnamese with these benefits while their governments were at war with America? Of course not. • Israel grants captured Arab terrorists, who attack Israelis without uniforms or insignia of any kind identifying them as combatants, and who deliberately murder unarmed civilians in cold blood, even small children, the same rights normally granted to legitimate prisoners of war, or to ordinary convicted criminals in democratic societies. Yet the long-established rules of war permit the execution of combatants who fight without uniforms as spies, and also allow the execution of those who deliberately kill civilians. Israel even permits imprisoned terrorists to attend college in Israel. Some have even donegraduate studies and have been awarded university degrees while in custody! The terrorist prisoners are also allowed conjugal visits from their wives -a privilege not required by any of the international conventions on treatment of prisoners of war. The Nazis, on the opposite end of the humanitarian spectrum from Israel, shot all out -of -uniform combatants or undercover enemy agents immediately, or as soon as all information could be tortured out of them. They also caused millions of lawful, uniformed prisoners of war to die of starvation and disease in their POW camps. In contrast, the overwhelming majority of Arab terrorists held prisoner by Israel have survived their captivity and have eventually been released in good health. These are only a few examples of the absurdity of the Nazi -Israel equation made by Ayloush and so many other anti -Israel propagandists. As Hitler shrewdly observed in his Mein Kampf, the bigger the lie, the more easily people can be persuaded http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02... 6/24/2010 American Thinker- Print Article Page 3 of 3 to believe it, provided it is simple enough for the simplest person to grasp and it is repeated constantly. Today's anti -Israel propagandists are always careful to follow Hitler's advice on how to lie; and like him, they have become highly successful at persuading people to believe their lies. Their rhetorical maneuvers are also examples of the technique that George Orwell, the great prophet of propaganda warfare in our tune, termed blackwhite or turnspeak-the deliberate attempt to represent something or someone as the exact opposite of what it, or he, truly is, and to make one's own views or objectives appear to be the exact opposite of what they truly are. According to Orwell, the turnspeakers wish us to believe that "war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." Certainly this motto accurately distills the essence of anti -Israel propaganda. Israel, the ultimate humane and democratic society, humane and democratic to a fault and to its own injury while it is being victimized by utterly ruthless enemies, is the exact opposite of Nazi Germany in every possible respect. But if Israel in reality bears no resemblance at all to Nazi Germany, is their any side in the Arab-Israeli dispute that does? Stay tuned . John Landau contributed to this article Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2007102/hussam_ayloush_poisonndiscours.html at June 24, 2010 - 12:55:33 PM CDT http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02... 6/24/2010 Windows Live Hotmail Print Message Page 1 of 6 FW: Here come the brides From:01111111111.1110111111111111111- Sent: Wed 6/16/10 8: A To: Viiiiiii111.1111 Cc: 40 1.1.11011.1011111111111111 00.0mw_. Attachments: image001.jpg (195.0 KB), image002.jpg (151.9 KB), image004.jpg (159.9 KB), image003.jpg (200.0 KB) Pass it around Read all the way to the end. And Israel is condemed by the world for trying to defend themselves against people with THIS KIND OF MINDSET??9999'099? Please pray for these little girls in these Muslim countries You do realize the Iran was just put on the board of decision makers at the UN related to "Women's Rights"111111Wi1ifirtIM11111 OMG put the Fox in the Henhouse!!!! Subject: FW: Here come the brides you think these people [Muslims] have a different "culture" than we do? This is ane of the saddest sights you'll ever see. As sad as this is, as many people as possible need to know this goes on. Mass Muslim Marriage in Gaza Poor kids - what a terrible fate to be born as a girl in a Muslim country HAMAS PLAYS HOST TO PaEDOPHILIA http://by146w.bay146.mail.live.corn/mail/PrintShell.aspx?type=message&cpids=43111006... 7/10/2010 Windows Live Hotmail Print Message Page 2 of 6 Muhammed married a six year old bride. But Islam has evolved in 1500 years. In Hamas land, in 2009, the brides are almost seven. Mass Muslim Marriage in Gaza 450 Grooms Wed GIRLS Under Ten In Gaza By Paul L. Williams, Ph.D. Thelastcrusade.org A gala event has occurred in Gaza . Hamas sponsored a mass wedding for four hundred and fifty couples. Most of the grooms were in their mid to late twenties; most of brides were under ten. Muslim dignitaries including Mahmud Zahar, a leader of Hamas, were on hand to congratulate the couples who. took part in the carefully staged celebration. We are saying to the world and to America that you cannot deny us joy and happiness, Zahar told the grooms, all of whom were dressed in identical black suits and hailed from the nearby Jabalia refugee camp. Each groom receiveda gift of 500 dollars from Hamas. The pre -pubescent girls, dressed in white gowns and adorned with garish make- up, received bridal bouquets. http://by 146w.bay 146.mail.live.com/mail/PrintShell.aspx?type=message&cpids= 43111006... 7/10/2010 Windows Live Hotmail Print Message We are presenting this wedding as a gift to our people who stood firm in the face of the siege and the war. Local Hamas strongman Ibrahim Salaf said in a speech. The wedding photos tell the rest of the sordid tale. The International Center for Research on Women now estimates that there are 51 million child brides now living on planet earth and almost all in Muslim countries. Twenty-nine percent of these child brides are regularly beaten and molested by their Husbands in Egypt ; twenty six percent receive similar abuse in Jordan . Every year, three million Muslim girls are subjected to genital mutilation, according to UNICEF. This practice has not been outlawed in many parts of America . The Islamic practice of pedophilia dates back to the prophet Muhammad, who amassed Eleven wives and many concubines after the death of his first wife Khadijah in 619 A.D. Page 3 of 6 http://by 146w.bay 146. mail.live.cow/mail/PrintShell.aspx?type=message&cpids=43111006... 7/10/2010 Windows Live Hotmail Print Message After Muhammads elderly wife, Khadijah, died in 619 A.D., he amassed eleven wives. He arranged the visits to the tents of his women around their menstrual cycles. His Capacity for sexual congress seemed to be boundless. Sahih Bukhari, one of the most Revered Islamic texts, recounts: The Prophet used to visit his wives in a round, during The day and night, and they were eleven in number. I asked Anas, Had the Prophet The strength for it? Anas replied, We used to say that the Prophet had the [sexual] stamina Of thirty [men].[1] For in-between treats, the Prophet kept a stable of concubines, including Reihana, His Jewish captive. His wives and mistresses were compelled by Islamic law to satisfy his Sexual needs at any time of the day or night, and the Prophet reserved the right to enjoy Them from the top of their heads to the bottom of their feet. [2] This might not appear shocking to students of the Kinsley Report, except for the case Of Aisha, Muhammads favorite wife. Aisha was the daughter of Abu Bakr, the Prophet's Closest friend and most faithful follower. As soon as Muhammad laid eyes on Aisha, he Came to fantasize having sex with her. There was a problem with this fantasy. Aisha, at that time, was a small child of four or five, while Muhammad was a middle-aged man of fifty.[3] Page 4 of 6 http://by 146w.bay 146.mail.live.com/maillPrintShell. aspx?type=message&cpids=43111006... 7/10/2010 Windows Live Hotmail Print Message Page 5 of 6 Still and all, the Prophet wasted no time in making his fantasy a reality. When Aisha turned six, Muhammad asked Abu Bakr for his daughter's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr thought that such A union would be improper - not because Aisha was a mere child but rather because he considered Himself Muhammads brother. The Prophet quickly brushed aside this objection by saying that The union was perfectly right in the eyes of Allah. Abu Bakr consented_ And Muhammad took the little girt as his new bride. When they were married, Muhammad, in his mercy, permitted Aisha to take her toys, including her dolls, To their new tent.(41 The marriage was consummated when Aisha was nine, and the Prophet fifty-three.[5] The three year waiting period was not caused by Muhammad concern of sexually molesting a child But rather by the fact that Aisha contracted some disease which caused her to lose her hair. [61 Pedophilia was not only practiced by Muhammad but also sanctioned by the Quran. In its discussion of the waiting period required to determine if a wife is pregnant before divorce, the sacred text says if you are in doubt concerning those of your wives who have ceased menstruating, know that their waiting period shall be three http://by 146w.bay 146.mail.live.com/m ail/PrintShell.aspx?type=message&cpids=43111006... 7/10/2010 Windows Live Hotmail Print Message months. The same shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated ?(65:4). Those who think that modem Muslims have abandoned this teaching should study the pictures and videos that accompany this article and recall the words of Ayatollah Khomeini, the most famous Islamic cleric of the 20th Century: A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate; sodomizing the child is OK. If a man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl's sister... It is better for a girl to marry in such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband's house rather than her father's house. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.[7] [1] Sahih Bukhari, 1:268, translated by M. Mushin Khan, Muslim Student Association, The University of Southern California, 2001, http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/ [2] Ibn !shay, Sirat Rasul Allah, pp. 525-526. [3] Sahih Bukhari, 5: 235. [4] Ibid., 8:151, 5:234. [5] !bid, 5:62, 63. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2934 - Release Date: 06/14/10 18:35:00 Page 6 of 6 Hotmait is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. See how. http://by 146w.bay 146.mail.live.con/mail PrintShell.aspx?type=message&cpids=43111006... 7/10/2010 Pledge of Friendship to Imam Mahmoud Harmoush The Imams of the Mosque or Islamic Centers in Temecula, California who want to be considered Moderates and insist the Mosque is a place of worship, MUST clearly declare the following declaration in their Iocal media and allow us to publicize. I Mahmoud Harmoush who want to conduct a mosque in Temecula, California, I therefore declare that: l-Redda Law, the Sharia Law that allows the killing of Muslims who convert to other faiths, must be banned in Islamic teachings and in Sharia legal doctrine. We do not accept, but condemn and renounce this teaching in Islam, the Quran, the teachings of Mohammad, and in Shariah Law_ We publicly denounce and condemn this teaching and practice in all Islamic countries. 2- Current mainstream Shariah doctrines justify the use of violence against women. They encourage men to beat their wives to discipline them. They allow women accused of adultery to be stoned to death. These doctrines are barbaricaIly inhumane, and teach Muslim children to be violent. These teachings must be ended by reinterpreting the Islamic text that justifies such violence. We hereby condemn and renounce this teaching in Islam, the Quran, the teachings of Mohammad, and in Shariah Law. 3- Traditional Sharia doctrines teach Muslims that they "must engage in war so that Islam will dominate the world. When Islam becomes dominant, Non -Muslims are offered three options: to convert to Islam, to pay Jizzia (a humiliating tax), or to be killed." These doctrines run contrary to modem respect for diversity and for personal freedom of speech and belief. This understanding of Jihad that seeks domination of Islam over other peoples must no longer be regarded as an Islamic value and its teaching as a duty for Muslims must end. We do not accept, but condemn and renounce this teaching in Islam, the Quran, the teachings of Mohammad, and in Shariah Law. 4- Jews are individuals who deserve the same respect accorded to all individuals. They should not be called "pigs and monkeys." The Islamic teaching that Muslims must "fight and kill all Jews before the end of days" is totally incorrect and anacceptable. AlI teachings that encourage anti-Semitic attitudes, violence or disrespect toward Jews, we do not accept, but condemn and renounce this teaching in Islam, the Quran, the teachings of Mohammad, and in Shariah Law. 5- Slavery is a crime against humanity. All Sharia laws that justify slavery in our modern times must not be taught any more. The Imam in charge of the mosque must have a clear and loud voice against slavery. 6- Islamic Sharia laws permit the killing homosexuals. These laws are advocating a crime against our fellow human beings. They must be declared un -Islamic and their implementation must be considered criminal. 7- As Imam, I agree to reject and renounce all areas of Shariah Law and the teaching and writings of Mohammad that are contrary to the United States of America's Constitution. As citizens of the United States, whether by birth or through naturalization, I/we agreeto abide by, honor, and protect the Constitution of the United States of America. I hereby publicly declare all areas of Shariah Law and the teachings and writings of Mohammad that are contrary to the US Constitution to be null and void. 8- As Imam, I will not allow my mosque to be used as a base for fund-raising or speaking/teaching for other groups or individuals who do not hold to publicly condemning the areas of Shariah Law and the teachings and writings of Mohammad that contradict the Laws of the United States of America and her Constitution. 9- As Imam, I .will publish a statement and make it available to anyone entering my mosque, clearly stating the areas of Shariah Law and the teachings and writings of Mohammad that I am denouncing and condemning. 10- I hereby publicly declare, and will clearly teach that Hamas is a terrorist organization and that I condemn its philosophies, teachings, and activities of terrorism. God's Gift of Unalienable Rights & Article VI of the Constitution: The Sword & Shield to stop the islamization of America. By Publius Huldah. This is an encouraging paper, because it explains the moral and constitutional justifications to stop the islamization of our country. We face a grave threat — the Muslims are infiltrating our country and taking over. We seem powerless to resist: Our governments won't acknowledge the threat; we are told Muslims have "constitutional rights" to come here, proselytize everywhere, build mosques, and implement shariah in their communities and in the public square; and our governments are letting them do it. The Muslims seek to replace our Constitution with shariah — their totalitarian political, economic, military, social & legal system — with the goal of incorporating our Country into a global Islamic caliphate. They are making progress in islamicizing our Country because we are not resisting. And the dreadful message we are getting from all sources is that aur Constitution renders us powerless to resist islamization. But read on, and I will show you how our Constitution & Declaration of independence — properly understood — actually give aur federal, State & local governments justification and authority to stop the islamization of our Country. Once we understand two things, it becomes clear what we may — and must — do: One: Islam is not a "religion" in the sense we understand religion. Islam is about TOTAL POWER. It is a system which controls every aspect of the lives of those who have the misfortune to be subjected to it. It masquerades as a religion, but once we understand that it is just another totalitarian system — like soviet communism, we can deal with it and defeat it. Once in place, Islam is enforced with stone -age barbarism. It masquerades as a religion to recruit gullible fools who become suicide bombers, and to provide "cover" for officials in the Western countries who, indoctrinated with the Lies of multiculturalism & political correctness, look for an excuse to do nothing. Two: We must understand Our Founding Principles — these are our Sword & Shield — that (1) Rights come from God alone, (2) Muslims do not have the right to divest us of our Rights, and (3) the purpose of civil government is to secure the Rights God gave us. Now let us learn more of our Sword and Shield. 1. Let us first consider Our Rights. What are our rights, and where do they come from? The Constitution? The First Ten Amendments? NO! The Declaration of Independence says: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, ... Those words are golden: Our Rights come from God Who Created the Universe; and the purpose of civil government is to secure the Rights GOD gave us. God gave us many Rights: Life! Liberty! Pursuit of Happiness! To work and enjoy the fruits of our own labors. To earn, inherit and keep private property. To demand that the civil authorities obey the Law — and to hold them accountable when they don't. To have a civil government which protects our God given rights, protects us from invasion and criminals, but gives fair trials to accused persons. Equal treatment under the law: Courts are not to favor the rich, or the poor, or males or females. God means for us to enjoy life! Healthy food, wine and strong drink (in moderation); attractive dress for women, the marriage relation between man & woman, prosperity, and liberty! As long as we obey the criminal laws (don't murder, steal, bear false witness, and the like), we have the right to be left alone. Liberty is the rule in God's Model for civil government. That is why our Liberty Bell quotes Leviticus 25:10 — "Proclaim LIBERTY throughout all the Land unto all the Inhabitants thereof." 2. Do Muslims respect the rights God gave us? Life? Theirs is a culture of death: murder, honor killings & suicide bombers. Liberty? Theirs is a culture where women are slaves and prisoners, little girls toys for old men, and conversion to Christianity a capital offense. Pursuit of Happiness? Theirs is a culture of torture & sadism. Young Muslim girls in America who talked to non -Muslim boys were shot to death by their father in the back seat of his taxicab. Wife --beating is commonplace. Women who don't cover their hair are lashed. Women are mutilated and maimed on the faces and even in their private places. Freedom of Speech? Theirs is a culture where criticizing Islam leads to a terrible death. You can go down the list: For every Right God gave us, the Muslims take it away. Let's look at just one God-given right — the Right to a fair trial Searing false witness is condemned (The Ten Commandments); the evidence of two or more witnesses is required to prove a case (Deut 19:15 &Matthew 18:16); public trials are required (Exodus 18:13); & judges are required to be fair, impartial, & without favoritism, (Deut. 1:16-17). Do. Muslims respect this God-given right to a fair trial? NO! In Iran, judges in "morals" cases (adultery) are allowed to make their own subjective determinations that a person is guilty even in the absence of any EVIDENCE! Do Muslims have the "right" to impose in this Country a shariah system which takes away the rights GOD gave us? No! God did not give Muslims the "right" to take away from us, the rights He gave us! 3. We are told Muslims have a "First Amendment right" to build mosques, proselytize, and implement shariah here. But is that what the First Amendment says? No! Let's read it: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The First Amendment doesn't grant any rights to anybody! All it does is prohibit CONGRESS from making laws about religion, speech, the press, or assembly! So Muslims do not have a "First Amendment right" to build mosques, proselytize, and implement shariah here. 4. Not only do Muslims claim the "right" to impose shariah in the Muslim communities springing up throughout our Country, they also claim the "right" to impose shariah law in the public square: They demand shariah compliant financial institutions, foot baths in public places, that wine, sausages, and the like be banned from their presence, that they be allowed to shut down public streets for "prayers", etc. Do Muslims have the "right" to apply their taw here? No! Art. VI, clause 2 of Our Constitution says: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. OUR Constitution and laws authorized by OUR Constitution are the supreme law of this land — and anything to the contrary must fall. It violates Our Constitution for Muslims to practice shariah here! Muslims who thus seek to overthrow Our Constitution and replace it with shariah are guilty of criminal sedition. The federal government has the duty to prosecute them for sedition — or deport them. 5. Can the federal or state or local governments property extend to Muslims a "right" to build mosques & proselytize here? No! Because The Declaration of Independence says the purpose of civil government is to secure the rights God gave us. Muslims seek to take away our God-given Rights. Civil government is supposed to protect us from those who seek to divest us of our Rights. We must insist that our federal, State, and local governments STOP the islamization of Our Country. We must insist that they live up to the one legitimate purpose of civil government: to protect our GOD -given rights. 6. WE are a Christian Country based on Judeo — Christian principles. Our Constitution is not a suicide pact. It does not require us to permit Muslims to take Our Country over and destroy Our principles and impose their barbaric totalitarian system on us. The Declaration of Independence recognizes God as Creator, supreme Judge and Regulator of the World, and as our Divine Protector. Article VII of Our Constitution, just above the signatures, recognizes the. Lordship of Jesus Christ. It says, Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven ... 7. So! Let us summarize the above three Principles: (1) Our Rights come from God — they predate & preexist the Constitution. Our Constitution doesn't give "rights" to anybody. So Muslims don't have "constitutional rights" to come here, build mosques, proselytize, and impose shariah. (2) All the Evidence shows that Muslims take away from People the Rights God gave them. Since Our Declaration of Independence acknowledges that the purpose of civil governments is to secure the Rights GOD gave us, it is the duty and responsibility of civil governments at all levels to protect us from islamization. (3) Article VI, clause 2, U.S. Constitution — the "Supremacy clause" - makes it unconstitutional for Muslims to practice shariah law ANYWHERE in Our Country. 8. The Center for Security Policy recently issued a scholarly (but readable) report: "Shariah: The Threat to America". Important suggested policy changes are listed on pages 141-144. Tell your tea party groups! Take delegations to your local, state, and federal representatives and tell them about it. Most of them are weak & ignorant, so you must educate them and demand that they do their job and defend your community from islamization. 9. Dutch Member of Parliament Geert Wilders lists ten steps western countries must take to stop the islamization of their countries. All ten steps are mandated by our Declaration of Independence, and consistent with our Constitution: (1) Stop cultural relativism: We must formalize the Idea that we have one dominant culture that is based on Judaism & Christianity [Wiiders adds "humanism"]. (2) Stop pretending that Islam is a religion. (3) Show the true face of fundamentalist Islam. It is a brutal totalitarian ideology. (4) Stop all immigration from Muslim countries. For Muslims who are already citizens, tell them that if they adhere to our values and our Constitution, they may stay as equals. But if they deviate, we will expel them. (5) Outlaw shariah and deport practitioners. (6) Require Muslims to sign legally binding pledge of integration and allegiance. (7) Stop building. mosques. (8) Seek reciprocity .with Saudi Arabia for western churches & synagogues. (9) Close all Islamic schools -- they are fascist institutions teaching hate. (10) Remove our current weak leaders. It is time to boldly stand up for Our God, OUR Declaration of Independence, and Our Constitution, and say, "No!" to those who are taking over Our Country. It is time to use Our God-given unalienable Rights and Our Constitution as the Sword & Shield they are meant to be. We can and must use these to defeat Islamization. Notice of Public Hearing CHANGE OF DATE A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case Nos: PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 Applicant: Stephen Sigler, Axis 3 Architecture/Islamic Center of Temecula Valley Proposal: A two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a completed Environmental Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. As a result, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for adoption in compliance with CEQA Case Planner: Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: December 1, 2010 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 506-5115. City �fTemecu(a 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 (951) 694-6400 FAX (951) 694-6477 APPEAL (PUBLIC WEARING) Planning Application No. Original Planning Application Number(s); PA08-0241 and PM)8-0242 Appealing the decision of (Specify Director of Planning, Directors Hearing, or Planning Commission and Action Dato): PLANNING COMMISSION December 1, 2010 Briefly specify what action or decision is being appealed: Development Plan-- and lanand Conditional Use Permit for the Islamic Center Of Temecula Valley Assessor's Parcel No(s): APN 957-140-012 Legal Description (Tract, Lot No.)! JO- Street Address(es): K%A General Location: Snnthwesl, Corner of Nicolas Ro €i and Cillo R: Applications - FormslAppeals-Revised o9-05,doo 2 APPELLANT/REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT ROMBACH, George F.X. LAST FIRST MI E-MAIL PROPERTY OWNER PHONE NO. ADDRESS E-MAIL LnsT STRE'ET FIRST FAX NO. MI. STATE' ;IP Lia I certify that all filing requirements have, teen satisfied for my application. 1 further understand that an incomplete application cannot t -aeped for essing1 Applicant's Sigriature Owner Certifi'cation I;i I certify under the penalty of the laws of the State of California that 1 am the property owner of the property that is the subject matter of this application and I am authorizing to and hereby do consent to the filing of this application and acknowledge that the final approval by the City of Temecula, if any, may result in restrictions, limitations and construction obligations being imposed on this real property. Date; 15 December 2010 Owner/Authorized Agent Signature: Date; Print Name: Written authorization from the legal property owner is required. An authorized agent for the owner must attach a notarized letter of authorization from the legal property owner. R:Wppllcations - FormsWppeals-Revised 09-05.doc a As an individual and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens 3 1 2 3 e-maill: 4 Telephone: Facsimile: Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS GEORGE F. X. ROMBACH, PhD, JD, CPA 6 7 8 CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 PLANNING COMMISSION 10 11 In Re: ) PLANNING APPLICATION 12 ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA 13 VALLEY 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Nos. PA08-0241. and PA08-0242 (APN 957-140-012) APPEAL SECTION A DESCRIPTION OF WHAT ACTION IS BEING APPAELI D Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 COMES NOW GEORGE FREDERICK XAVIER ROMBACH, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens, to APPEAL the approval on December 1, 2010 of the City of Temecula Planning Commission of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY on October 14, 2010 for a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a very low (VL) residential zone located at the Southwest Corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri (APN 957-140-012) -1- AI'PF'.AL Section A _... Description oI'Action being Appealed 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 12 3, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2.2 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Dated: December 15, 2010 George V.: X. Rombach -2- APPEA1,-- Section A Dosceipt ion or Aution bong Appealed 1 GEORGE F. X. ROMBACH, PhD, JD, CPA 2 3 e-mail: tomosamilippw 4 j Te!cphone: futile: Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In Re: CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY PLANNING APPLICATION Nos. PA08-024.1 and PA08-0242 (APN 957-140-012) APPEAL SECTION 13 DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE APPAEL Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 COMES NOW GEORGE FREDERICK XAVIER ROMBACH, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens, to provide the SUPPORT FOR THE APPEAL of the approval on December 1, 2010 of the City of Temecula Planning Commission of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08- 0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEIV1ECU'LA VALLEY based on the attached Points and Authorities in Opposition thereto, which consists of written points and authorities submitted to the Commission at the Public Hearing on December 1, 2010 together with certain oral arguments put forth by various members of Concerned American Citizens on that date. -1- APPEAL. — Section B Description of Support for the Appcal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Dated: December 15, 2010 g&neficie4 George F. X. Rombach -2- APPEAL, — Section 14 Description of Support for the Appeal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 In Re: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GEORGE F. X. ROMBACH, PhD, JD, CPA 'Telephone: �siaxtilr�: Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF, RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY PLANNING APPLICATION Nos. PA48-0241 and PA08-0242 (APN 957-140-012) MEMORANDUM ()l POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION Application Filed: October 14, 2008 Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 COMES NOW GEORGE FREDERICK XAVIER ROMHACJJ, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of 'Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens, to provide Points and Authorities in Opposition to Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY (hereinafter referred to as the "ICOTV") for a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit (hereinafter referred to as the "CUP") for a religious facility to be located at the Southwest Corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri (APN 957-140-012) -i- Mummorartdum or points and Authorities in Opposition 12 14 15 6 )7 1 9 20 21 22 2.3 24 25 2( 27 28 Table Of Authorities iv e: The It.aw Establishment Clause RLIJIP A CEQA 'Me Brown Act .1. —Analysis Parking 'fraffic . . . Resolving the Traffic Issues Emergency EVilCuation EnVi r0 rallent a I IS SU eS . X Flood Plainissues Other Churches have been . enied . . Height of Minarets NO Sunday Services Suham:alai Burden Issues (RLIJIPA) . . 15 No Impartial Review , , 16 No Consideration Of S13 375 1 2 3 3 4 4 7 9 10 10 11 12 13 15 4tinornidi ivosithi 19 4 6 7 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 7 9 20 21 22 23 2,4 25 26 27 28 IV. Conclusion General ly Constitutionality CEQA Mostitte Parking In rrastructure No Nccd to Approve Both ,Applications V ri flention Monlocondum nod Atoll In Oppo3it ion • 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 22 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TABLE OF AUTUORITII CONSTITUTION: Constitution to the United States of America First Amendment — Establishment Clause mm— Free Exercise Clause STATUTORY LAW: Brown Act (California Government Code Section 54950 et seq.) California Public Resources Code § 21000 ct seq. (CEQA) Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), Pub. L 106-274, 42 U.S.C. § 2000c:c-1 et seq. . 1,2&20 1, 2, 4, 6 & 7 1, 3, 16 & 17 1,3,10,11&20 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 12, 14, 15 & 19 FEDERAL CASE LAW: Cantwell_ v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) 2 Cmtnt3 a Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas , v. City g?. ,.YuIm.t 615 F.Supp.2d 980, 989 (D.Ariz.,2009) 6 & 15 Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005) 2 Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter, 82 456 F,3d978, (9th Cir. 2006) 9 & 15 Hillcrest Christian School v. City of Los Angeles, WL 4662042 (2007) 16 lutetrratic r l Church of .c 1 cl d�z ... ,ospe1._.,v,..,., ltysLf S<r C.,eandro:, 15 632 F.Supp.2d 925+ Lighthouse Community Church of God v. City of Southfield, 382 F.Supp.2d 937 (2005) 11 lidrasl Sephardi, lire. v Tfrwvrr til Surfside, Cir.2004) 36617.3d 12174, 1227 (11 15 Palko v, Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 326 (1937) 2 °air :lose Christian College v City of Morgan Hill, 360 F.3d 1024, 1034 (9th Cir.2004) 15 -iv- Memorandum of Points and Authoriti....in O posit . . ....... � cs in Opposition 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALIFORNIA CASE LAW: ckjzens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors, (1990) 52 CaL3d 553 10 county a luyo .v. Yorty, (1973) 32 CaLApp.3d 795 10 No Oil v. City of Los Anggilli, (1974) 13 Ca1.3d 68 10 Memorandni of Poinis nn0 Att111011TICin C)pposttwn I. ISSUE In this United States of America, unlike many other countries in this world, there is a right to assemble for worship. It is at the very core ot'our free exercise of religion — our "Freedom of Religion". Further, it is clear that religious assemblies cannot function without a physical space adequate to meet their needs. Those are not, can not be, the issues before the City of Temecula, Planning Commission. The issue is whether or not this Commission can approve the proposed ICO TV project its presently proposed without violating the Constitution of the United States of America, applicable Federal Statutes and California Statutes, and docs it comply with General Plan and Ordinances of the City of Temecula. That is the only issue before the Commission. IL THE LAW The primary law on the issue includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitiition (hereinafter referred to as the "ESTABLISI"IMENT CLAUSE"): the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Pub. L 106-274, 42 U.S.C. § 200Occ-1 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as the "RLUIPA"); the California Environmental Quality Act California Public Resources Cocle § 21000 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as the "CFQA"); The Brown Act (California Ooverntncnt Code Section 54950 cit seq.); and the Riverside County Code. ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: The ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE is the first of several pronouncements in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". Together with the FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE ("... or prohibiting the free exercise thereof'), are the two clauses that make up what are commonly called the "religion clauses" of the First Amendment. The ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE was initially interpreted to prohibit 1) the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or 2) the preference by the U.S. government of Wl,. Memorandum ofl'oints and Authorities In Opposition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 one religion over another. The first approach is called the "separation" or "no aid" interpretation, while the second approach is called the "non -preferential" or "accommodation" interpretation. The accommodation interpretation prohibits Congress from preferring one religion over another. However, it does not prohibit the government's entry into religious domain to make accommodations in order to achieve the purposes of the Religion Clauses. Prior to the enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1868, the Supreme Court generally held that the substantive protections of the Bill of Rights did not apply to state governments. However, under the Incorporation Doctrine, which is an interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights has been broadly applied to limit state and local government including the City of Temecula, California. The process of "Incorporating" the two Religion Clauses of the First Amendment was twofold. Thc first step was the Supreme Court's conclusion in 1940 that the Free Exercise Clause was made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. (Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)). This raised difficulties: the Due Process Clause protects those rights in the Bill of Rights "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty," (Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 326 (1937)) and free exercise of religion is a quintessential individual right which had been recognized as such at the state level from the beginning). RLUIPA: RLUIPA is a United States federal law that prohibits the imposition of burdens on the ability of prisoners to worship as they please, as well as giving churches and other religious institutions a way to avoid burdensome zoning law restrictions on their property use, It was enacted by the United States Congress in 2000. On June 1, 2005 the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled the RLUIPA did not violate establishment clause (Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 I.J.S. 709 (2005)) The purpose of RLUIPA is to protect individuals, houses of worship, and other religious institutions from discrimination in zoning and landmarking laws, and to place religious institutions on an equal footing. Consideration of land use issues is not only appropriate, it is mandatory. -2- MGmoranclum orl'oints and Authorities in (lppo i n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RLUIPA prohibits state and local governments from imposing a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the exercise of religion unless the regulation is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. The courts have noted that are three steps in evaluating the application of RLUIPA to a particular case: (1) Docs it apply? (2) Is there a substantial burden to religious exercise? (3) Docs the government have a compelling interest that is achieved by the least restrictive means? CEQA: CEQA is a California statute passed in 1970, shortly atter the United States federal government passed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to institute a statewide policy of environmental protection. CEQA does not directly regulate land uses, but instead requires state and local agencies within California to follow a protocol of analysis and public disclosure of the potential environmental impacts of development projects. Because CEQA makes environmental protection a mandatory part of every California state and local agency's decision making process, it has become a model for environmental protection laws in other states. It has also become the basis for numerous lawsuits concerning public and private projects. Under CEQA, all state and local agencies must give major consideration to environmental protection. THE BROWN ACT: The Brown Act (California %iovcrnmcnt Code Section 54950 et seq.) enacted in 1953 seeks to ensure that the deliberations and actions of local governmental entities are taken openly in a public meeting where all persons are permitted to attend, The legislative intent is "... that the public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. It iv the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly." The basic rule under the Act is that "[All meetings of the legislative body of a local agency shall be open and public, and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the legislative body." (empha. is added) -3- Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Illi. ANALYSIS The primary issues include but are not necessarily limited to parking, height, political activities and how this Department has handled other religious projects in the immediate area. PARKING: The required parking for the proposed ICOTV project has been determined based on the size of the sanctuary or assembly area, using a calculation that is used for "churches, chapels and religious facilities". Based thereon it is proclaimed that the proposed ICOTV project is providing for more parking than they will ever need because they "providing double the number of spaces required". As hereinafter set forth that is simply not true. Iia passing RLUII'A, Congress found that the right to assemble' for worship is at the very core of the free exercise of religion. Religious assemblies cannot function without a physical space adequate to their needs and consistent with their theological requirements_ The parking for the proposed ICOTV project does not meet that standard. Simply applying the established general formula for churches does not make the result inherently right even when that formula has been codified. Using the same formula for all religious institutions regardless of their individual theological requirements docs not therefore inherently place those religious institutions on an equal footing. On the other hand regulating parking and traffic in order to protect the safety of citizens of the City of Temecula is certainly a cotnpelling government interest, and requiring that the ICOTV project have adequate on-site parking is the least restrictive means to achieve that interest, In the western style of church of other religious building the primary feature of the structure is the "sanctuary" that has pews and aisles where the whole family worships together. The established general formulas for determining the parking requirement for churches or other religious buildings is based on the average American family size and estimate of how many square feet of the sanctuary they effective occupy which amount is then divided into the total square feet of the sanctuary. It is my opinion that formulaic often fails to provide adequate parking as can be evidenced by the Calvary Baptist Church and the Grace Presbyterian Church next to the eite of -4- Memorandum of feints arid Authorities in Opposition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the proposal ICOTV project. On a Sunday morning the parishioner parking not only fills the parking lots of those churches it also lines the side of the streets of Calle Medusa and Calle Colibri, However, the parking requirements should be "blind" to the particular use i.e. a religious building, and simply consider the actual number of people that will utilize the property. As such the formulaic system does not work for a mosque because its "sanctuary" sire by limiting it to the main prayer room which has no pews or isles and the usage of which has a much higher density. More importantly main prayer room is used by the MEN ONLY. The women and child are in different rooms which are not included in the parking calculation. While application liar CUP cloes not disclose whether that will be the case for the proposed ICOTV project, 1 can say of my own personal knowledge that such was the procedure at every mosque in this Country and around the world. Notwithstanding whether ICO'1 V project will use the traditional format of worship or not let us look at their numbers. They application provides for 181 parking spaces, which they claim is far beyond the required. Using that higher number of parking spaces the formula applied in reverse says shows that the proposed ICOTV project is only providing parking for approximately 5,400 square feet, less that 22 % of the total proposed project. If the other 19,500 square feet requires no parking of any kind or nature but includes at least seven (7) classrooms, Why is all of this all being built and what is it going to be used for. The truth is the total ICOTV project and its operating plan totally and completely defies any kind of logical sense whatsoever. The insufficient parking spaces for the ICOTV intended use, and consequently the overflow parking would clog the surrounding streets endangering the public safety and welfare. As such, the sante formulaic approach does NOT come anywhere close to putting the mosque on an equal,footing with the churches around. If the formulas were adjusted to add in the other rooms for the women and child, and the use density the number of spaces required would increase by at least four (4) times. The "Similarly Situated" approach under the "Equal Terms" Provision of RLUIPA attempts to interject a modicum of reasonableness into the analysis of parking requirements. Under this approach it must be determined what exactly are the appropriate institutional uses of an -5- memontown or Palms:lid Authorities in Oppo � U511i0f1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 actual comparator by asking whether the uses and impacts of the comparator are in fact "similar" to the use and impacts in the proposed project. [Centro Familiar Cristiana Buenas Nuevas v. City of Yuma (D.Ariz. 2009) 9th Circuit]. Clearly the "Similarly Situated" approach should be applied in the instant matter. This Commission has, or should have, actual knowledge of the accuracy of that statement. That is the very thing that happened in connection with the mosque ot'similar size that is only a half an hour up the road in Corona, California. That mosque persuaded the City of Corona to use the same formulaic approach being sought by the proposed ICOTV project. When the Corona Mosque was initially occupied, the parking needs immediately exceeded their parking 101 by al least four (4) times. By force of occupancy the Corona mosque took over surrounding parking resources for their own use. That situation in Corona has resulted in a serious public safety problem. If the City of Temecula repeats that proven error of Corona, it will create a serious public safety problem here in Temecula. Further, the ICOTV has demonstrated they know the proposed project does not have suitable or adequate parking when its members tried their own "Corona Plan" by approaching Calvary Baptist Church seeking permission to park in their parking lot (See page 3 the July 11, 2010 letter to City of Temecula Mayor, Jeff Comerchcro, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference). Further, that Exhibit demonstrates the City has had actual knowledge of this issue for live (5) months, and has apparently not only done nothing about it and there was no indication that the issue was adequately addressed by the Panning Commission in the application process — Why? Of even greater concern is that, 1 am informed and based thereon believe and allege, that when the Calvary Baptist Church denied the request the ICOTV .members responded with a thinly veiled threat that would they "would be sorry". If Temecula had the saint result as Corona, then the effect of the Commission's approval of the proposed ICOTV project would be to effectively cause significant impairment of the free exercise of religion of congregations of the Calvary Baptist Church and the Grace Presbyterian Church in their existing houses of worship. With actual knowledge of the probability of the parking problem, and depending on the degree of impairment, the approval could amount to -C- Memorandum of Points and WAuthorities in d ppo;aiti,on 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ?3 24 25 26 27 28 "prohibiting the free exercise thereof' and arguably a violation of the FREE EXERCISE. CLAUSE of the First .Amendment to the United States Constitution. In the alternative, the City of .Temecula could impose the same restriction on the proposed ICO1'V project that it put on the phase two project that the Grace Presbyterian Church presently has pending. When the sanctuary/ main prayer room is in use, no other part ol'the proposed 1COTV project could be used, That would totally resolve any issue as to whether the sanctuary/main prayer room was used by men only, and least partially level the playing flied. TRAFFIC: While members of this Commission have reportedly represented that the proposed 1COTV project will not have an adverse effect on traffic on Winchester Road and the Winchester Freeway (.1-15) off ramp because members of the subject congregation are: already using those roadway laeiiities at the congregation's current location. 1 strongly dispute that such a conclusion has any logical basis in the sheer size of the proposed ICOTV project clearly indicates the intent for it to be a destination facility which will inherently increase the traffic, Even though the traffic study for the proposed ICOTV project was allegedly available: that it could have been put up for public review on Friday, November 12, 2010, this Commission tailed and refused to actually make it available to the public until two weeks later during a holiday week just five (5) days before the hearing. In so doing, this Commission has effectively denied the public any real access to the information in the study. From the limited review of the traffic study that was effectively allotted, there are clearly serious problems. (1) The theses of day avoid the heaviest usage (rush hour) and the hours of usage Calvary Baptist Church and the Grace Presbyterian Church, as well as, proposed usage by the ICOTV project. (2) Did not measure all of the street locations primarily relevant to ingress and egress to the proposed IC'OTV project. (3) Did not address any history of accidents. When a member of our group tried to ask questions of the firma that conducted the traffic study, they failed and refused to provide the requested information and in their words "disengaged". However, even if that conclusion has any validity, it CAN NOT be denied that the traffic _7 - Memorandum of Points i Authorities riti n t.,. n— and Ait(taoPi[ley In O��potiition 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1! 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on Nicolas Road between Joseph Road/Via Lobo on one end and Calle Mcdusa/Liefer Road on the other end is already heavily congested and over taxed for the Calvary Baptist Church, the Grace Presbyterian Church and the residents in the immediate area. As such, it can not he denied that the proposed ICOTV project will impose a substantial burden on the religious exercise of the congregations of the Calvary Baptist Church and the Grace Presbyterian Church, as well as, the free access of the residents in the immediate area. In order to mitigate this religious land use dispute, RLUIPA requires such a burden imposed by any approval of the proposed 1COTV project be dealt with. To do so would at a minimum require that Nicolas Road from Joseph Road/Via Lobo on one end and Calle Medusa/l.,iefer [load on the other end be widened to four through traffic lanes (two each way), with a center left turn lane, bike lanes each direction, and provisions for no parking just as currently exits on Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Joseph .Road/'Via Lobo. In fact, 1 contend the required widening of Nicolas Road should extend further on to the "Y" of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol. Further, crossing Nicolas Roacl from Calle Medusa to Liefer Road is already a dangerous gauntlet especially during rush hour. The intersection should really be controlled by a traffic signal, Adding to the traffic burdens to this intersection which the proposed ICOTV project represents would frankly be irresponsible. Further, I atn informed and clo verily believe that the little Four Square Church was told by the Planning Commission staff that if they so much as erected an awning they would be responsible for paving Nicolas Road. Why the little Tbur Square Church should have that kind of responsibility and not the proposed ICOTV mega mosque project? Ms. Brigitte careen testified bel re Commission on Dec 141 about these traffic problems and stated that she had a Petition of residents concerned about the traffic conditions in the area of 1COTV project that had over one thousand (1,000) signatures but that the copy she was going to provide to the Commission was STOLEN while she was waiting to testify. Failure to address the traffic issues on just Nicolas Road in the manner set forth above will most certainly create a significant public safety issue if the CUP for the proposed ICOTV project -8- Memorandum tidum of Points and Autha ritie , in Opposition 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 were approved. Either the approval should be withheld until the traffic infrastructure catches up with demand or the cost of resolving the consequential problems that are the direct and proximate result of the proposed ICOTV project, should be the sole responsibility of that project just like any other development. RESOLVING THE TRAFFIC ISSUES: The Planning Commission indicated that the resolution of the above traffic issues has already been addressed by another Development Plan(s) and that ten (10) years or more from now we will not even remember that there was a traffic problem. There are two serious problems with that approach: 1) The traffic problem is currently being experienced today — not ten (10) years from now; and 2) 1 am informed, due verily believe and based thereon allege that at least one developer related to the Development Plan(s) that the Planning Commission was referring to has been in Bankruptcy and that any relief from that source is at best questionable. The Planning Commission has a sworn duty to PLAN for the land use and traffic of the City of Temecula. If they are going to do the age old political maneuver of "kicking the can down the road" for someone else to deal with, they should at least not take actions that will actually make the problem worse. That is exactly what the proposed ICOTV project will do, and the Planning Commission comments are effectively a defacto acknowledgement of that fact. The Planning Commission should either put this project on hold until the infrastructure needed to relieve these traffic problems are in place, or, if the proposed ECOTV project wants to proceed now, it provides for the current costs of doing so. 1n which case, the Planning Commission can certainly provide that the proposed ICOTV project be reimbursed under any future Development Plan benefited by that infrastructure for the next ten (10), or even twenty (20), years. While it may be true that this would be a considerable present expense for the ICOTV, it is their choice as to proceeding with this property at this time. Further, the courts have determined that even significant expense or delay would not constitute a substantial burden on religious exercise for purposes of RLUI.PA [Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter, 82 -9- Memorandum of Points tui<I IuthotitiCN in Opposition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 456F.3d 978, 991-92 (9th Cir. 2006)]. EMERGENCY EVACUATION: In the event of an emergency that required an evacuation, the only evacuation route for those in the Calvary Baptist Church and the ICOTV project would he Calle Colibri. That a very small street that is little more than a driveway would be the only exit route to Nicolas Road for more that three hundred (300) cars. In addition, another hundred and fifty (150) cars would be exiting Grace Presbyterian Church onto Nicolas Roacl just a few feet away from Calle Colibri. There does not seen? to have been any thought given to an emergency evacuation plan, and as it is presently laid out it virtually guarantees to lead to "the closure of streets that limit or delay access for emergency services', which is expressly discouraged by Policy 4.6 set out in the City of Temecula general Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: CEQA codifies a statewide policy dew/it—mil—lentil protection. According to CEQA, all state and local agencies must give major consideration to environmental protection in regulating public and private activities, and should not approve projects for which there exist feasible and environmentally superior .mitigation measures or alternatives. The requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (hereinafter referred to as the "BIR") is "the heart of CEQA." [County oflnyo v. Yorty, (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 795] An EIR serves to inform governmental agencies and the public of a project's environmental impacts [No Oil v. City of. Los Angeles, (1974) 13 Ca1.3d 681. Further, an EIR proposes mitigations and alternatives which may reduce or avoid the environrnental impacts; as the FIR is considered the heart of CEQA, mitigation and alternatives are considered the heart of the EIR [Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors, (1990) 52 Cal.3c1 553]. One alternative that a lead agency must usually consider is the "no project alternative" ["CEQA Guidelines Article 9: Contents of Environmental Impact Reports"]. _ 10- Mt<inoiar diem of Poling andAuth ili4s- in Apposition When a neighboring religious facility at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa, Grace Presbyterian Church was proposed, they were required to go through the complete EIR process at considerable expense. However, for the ICOTV project the EIR process was waived and the Application proceeded in that regard solely on the analysis and judgment of this Commission, and the Commission's adoption of the "Mitigated Negative Declaration" stating that there were no substantial evidence that the project would have significant effect on the environment when the Commission clearly has actual knowledge that the ICOTV project would have very significant impact on the environment. )Further, the Courts have held that the constitutional guaranty of the equal protection oI:'the law bars a city from applying land use regulations to a church in a way that is inconsistent with the treatment of other churches in the community, [Lighthouse t'omrnunity Church of Gael v. City of Southfield, 382 F.Supp.2d 937 (2005).1 The truth is that the "Mitigated Negative Declaration" IS NOT a proper finding of fae`.t, regarding the environmental impact of the ICOTV project under CEQA. The fact is that it is nothing more than an underhanded process to try and sneak the project through. Further, there was no evidence presented that all attic various agencies and authorities that should have been notified actually were. The two neighboring religious facilities were treated differently and need for an EIR for the ICOTV project was unquestionable in that proposed it would be building in the flood plane, which by itself is evidence of significant effect on the environment. There are also additional potential environmental issues relating to sewage, drainage and water that the proposed ICOTV project application did not adequately address. FLOOD PLAIN ISSUES: Policy 1,7 setforth in the General Plan of the City of Temecula states "Prohibit development of any kind, within the floodway portion of the 100 -year flood plain" (enwha,si.s' added) which forbids building in the flood plain along the subject area of Nicolas Road. In connection with the General Plan the Calvary Baptist Church was required to build out of the Manornnduin oi'Points and Authorities in Opposition' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 flood plain on the high ground completely away from Nicolas Road. And several years ago I was told on behalf of Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church to not even bother applying for CCP because of the flood plain. However, the proposed ICOTV project is being treated totally differently. Not only does Phase Two of proposed ICOTV project provide for building in the flood plain, there arc indications that this Commission is going to actively participate its efforts to have the property removed from flood plain designation. This Flood Plain issue is not some hypothecal or imaginary thing that will never actually happen — That some geologist sitting in a laboratory believes might possible happen. It actually happened at the subject site just thirty (30) years ago. In 1979/1980 there was massive flooding from rain fall that became further exacerbated when the gates of Lake Skinner were opened with warning or alarm. A wall of water went through the area sweeping seven horses away down river that were never round. The National Guard had to rescue residents clue to complete loss of roads. 'i'hey conducted several airlift operations including food for residents, feed for animals/livestock and actually rescued a family from a home on the corner of Nicolas Rd. and Winchester Rd, to save them from drowning. (Exhibit B attached is an aerial flood plain chart of the ICOTV parcel) Further, by requiring the Calvary Baptist Church to build Out ol'the flood plain at the very back of their parcel, and allowing the ICOTV to build a high profile structure forward on the parcel in the flood plain will allow ICOTV to overshadow and visually totally dominate and eclipse the Calvary Baptist Church from Nicolas Road. 13y approving the ICOTV application it imposes a substantial burden on the exercise of religion by Calvary Baptist Church and the City of Temecula has no compelling governmental interest in granting ICOTV application. As such, doing so would be a RLUII'A violation with appearance of City approval for a "victory mosque". OTHER CHURCHES HAVE BEEN DENIED ]PERMITS: Several years ago I was involved with the Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church in Temecula. That congregation had a ten (10) acre parcel off of East Benton where it planned to build its church but the requirements of the Planning Commission made it totally impractical to -12- Mernortuidwcf of Points andAuthoritcc,s in Opposition 1 2 3 4 5 {i 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 build, and in fact that land is still vacant. As a consequence, the congregation sold that parcel and began looking for new property. In looking four a new location on Nicholas Road it was of very special interest because of the name of the church (Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church). A parcel of particular interest was located at Via Lobo and Calle Colibri very near the location for the proposed ICOTV project. In light of problems experienced with the East Benton property, 1 came to the Planning Commission before proceeding with the acquisition of the property. I was told unequivocally that there was no way the Planning Commission would approve an application by Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church or any other church for that matter because they was already two churches, the master plan did not provide for any more, the land was in the flood plane, traffic issues, and that there were serous issues with flight pattern of the French Valley Airport. 1 was also old that any development in that area would be responsible for widening Nicholas Road and extending the flood control channel. Based on those communications and the pattern of denials and requirements on the Fast Benton property, and the attitude of the Planning Commission as to potential Nicholas Road property made it abundantly clear to .me that future attempts by Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church were most certainly futile. Further, 1 was absolutely convinced there was no possible way to get an approval to build a church in the arca. That situation with the proposed ICOTV project seems to he a parallel with the Ground Zero mosque in New York where another Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church that was destroyed in the 911 attacks is being denied to rebuilding of its church while the mosque a couple of blocks away is getting the red carpet treatment for approval as the proposed ICOTV project is getting. 1 am further informed that, since my experience with the Planning Commission, there has been at least one other church that has been unable to get approval to build a church in that area. HEIGHT OF MINARETS: Several years ago the office of the Planning Commissions represented to me that the ivicmoimrdua of Poir� .13 - and Autho fes in Opus 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Calvary Baptist Church was required to lower the height of their planned steeple in order to obtain a permit to build their church. 1 was tolcl the reason for that requirement was public safety in connection with flight pattern of the French Valley Airport. In prior encounters with tnosque projects, I have every time been told that the Muslim religion requires that the minarets of a mosque must be the highest structure in the community, which shows the superiority and dominance ol'the muslin religion, and that the freedom of religion guarantees that as a right. However, the truth is that the freedom of religion DOES NOT in any way guarantee the superiority or dominance of any religion or another or the height of its structures. In fact, RI,UII'A guarantees just the opposite. When the application was made for the proposed ICX)TV project, the design for the minarets was substantially higher than the actual steeple of the Calvary Baptist Church, However, I have been informed by the Planning Commissions that it had required the proposed ICOTV project lower the height of their minarets but would not give me a straight answer about whether the minarets are planned to be higher than the steeple of the Calvary Baptist Church. My understanding of the double talk that 1 got is that the height of the minarets may (or may not, I am not sure) be equal to the height of the steeple including the cross, but that a large crescent would be mounted atop the minaret higher than the cross on the steeple. I was also told that the height of the minarets of the proposed ICOTV project was a non - issue because the project was not in the flight pattern of the French Valley Airport. Due to the immediate proximity of the proposed ICOTV project and the Calvary Baptist Church, 1 do not know how one would be in the flight pattern and not the other. Further, I am not aware that the airport moved or its flight pattern has changed, and in :fact I see airplanes actually flying over the area at low altitudes. But it certainly raises the issue of whether the Planning Commission told inc the truth on both occasions. However, the flight pattern is not the real issue. In light of the special meaning given to the height of the minarets, if this Commission approves the application for the proposed ICOTV project with the highest part of crescent atop the minaret so much as a millimeter higher than the top of the cross atop the steeple of the Calvary Baptist Church, the concept of equal footing will -14- Metnorancium of Points and Authorities in Opposition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 be totally shot and it will be clear violation of RLU1PA. NO SUNDAY SERVICES: The ICOTV has professed that since their primary services would be conducted on Friday afternoon and evening, services for the existing churches, the Calvary Baptist Church and the Grace Presbyterian Church, are on Sunday morning there should be no conflict between the respective operations. However, the Plan of Operations for the ICOTV provides for "Sunday School" operation in direct conflict with Sunday morning services the existing. Prohibiting the Sunday operations for the ICOTV would relieve some of the congestion. SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN ISSUES AS TO RLUIPA: A `substantial burden' must place .more than an inconvenience on religious exercise; it must be `oppressive' to a 'significantly great' extent. The claim that is a `substantial burden' on `religious exercise' must be supported by evidence of imposition of a significant great restriction or onus upon such exercise." [C'ontr o Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas v. City o/'Yuma, 615 F.Supp.2d 980, 989 (i).Ari.,2009), citing, Guru Nanak Sikh Soc'v v. County crf'Sutter, 456 F.3d 978, 988 (9th Cir.2006), Midrash Sephardi, Inc. v_ Town ofSuriSide, 366 F.3d 1214, 1227 (11th Cir.2004)), and San Jose Christian Coll. v. City o/'A7organ hill, 360 F.3d 1024, 1034 (9th Cir.2004))]. The ICOTV has not demonstrated that they are subject to a `substantial burden', There are potential exceptions to the substantial burden provision. The courts have considered a generally neutral zoning law to violate the substantial burden provision IF the religious institution can prove that there is no other suitable land or Rropertics within the city or county. However, a religious institution would have to prove that it must he located within the particular zone because it cannot be located in those areas where churches are allowed. Examples of case where the applicants failed to meet that test include: (1) International Church of'Foursquare Gospel v. City of San Leandro, 632 F.Supp.2d 925, N.D.Cal., December 22, 2008 (Church failed to meet substantial burden because Church failed to prove that no other suitable properties existed in the City); (2) San Jose Christian College v. City of Morgan -I5- Memorandum or Points amd Authorities in Opposition 11111, 360 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1-.3cl 1024, (9111Cir, 2004) (College failed to ineet substantial burden_bccause city's actions had not lessened the possibility that the college could find a suitable property ("[There is] no evidence in the record demonstrating that College was precluded from using other sites within the city."); and (3) Hillcrest Christian School v. City of Los Angeles, 2007 WL 4662042 (School failed to meet substantial burden because School did not demonstrate that it would not be successful if it attempted to build a second campus on another parcel or significantly scaled back its current project. The ICOTV has not met that test in the instant case. NO IMPARTIAL REVIEW: One of the most important duties for elected officials to perforin is to be open and honest about their actions and to maintain their compliance with the minimal disclosure requirements of the Brown Act. It is amazing how many public agencies, and the staff supporting them, fail to take these basic tenants seriously. 'I'o many the requirements of the Brown Act are seen as a nuisance, rather than a responsibility; an annoyance, rather than an opportunity for accountability. That seems to have been the case with ICOTV project application. The Planning Commission anti its City Employees have an affirmative duty to be professional, neutral and conduct impartial reviews of all matters relating to transportation and land use in the City of Temecula. That duty requires this Commission to create a sustainable community strategy that protects the public sal4ty and li restyle of existing citizens ol'the City, while planning growth or the community in a lair, balanced and equitable manner. It appears that in connection with the proposed ICOTV project the Commission has fallen very short of that standard. In particular, Patrick Richardson, the Director of Planning and Redevelopment who I understand is currently in charge of the proposed ICOTV project issue within the Commission, seems to he a clear problem in this regard. I am informed and based thereon do verily believe and allege that Mr. Richardson has boldly boasted that be has been successrul in getting mosques established in two other com.t'nunities within Southern California; that his job in Temecula is to establish a mosque here; that the mosque in Temecula is a clone deal because it is their absolute 16.. .f_,Vncrimcuti 0)ntti Inc Aulnorities in iii 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Constitutional Right; and that public hearings are a meaningless formality. His personal feelings and motivations are clearly expressed in his letter dated November 10, 2010 (which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated by this reference) in which he characterizes those motivations as the pre judgment of the entire City Government. Mr. Richardson may fancy himself a "mosque builder", which may be all well and good, but not as the Director of Planning and Redevelopment for the City of Temecula in charge of approving a mosque project. In my opinion, ethics, morals and common decency would require that Mr. Richardson recuse himself from any and all activities regarding the proposed ICOTV project directly or indirectly , but he has not done so. Instead, what Mr. Richardson has apparently done is to mastermind a behind the scenes jamming of the proposed ICOTV project through the Planning Commission without regard for the public interest and awareness. The following events, which appear at least in part to be violations of the Brown Act, support that position: 1. Last summer Mr. Richardson tried to push the ICOTV project through an approval hearing without first posting a notice at the proposed site and otherwise as required by statute, but got caught and the public outcry forced the push back of the hearing; 2. As if nobody was watching, the Planning Commission tried to do so again by holding another approval hearing without first posting a notice at the proposed site and otherwise as required by statute, and they got caught again. This time the public outcry forced the push back of the hearing to November 2010; 3, In preparation for the November hearing, the notice was posted on the WRONG: PROPERTY and when that was brought to the attention of the Planning Commission, the notice sign was belatedly moved to the subject cite but was so poorly installed that it fell down within minutes. All of which invalidated the notice and again the public outcry forced the hearing to be pushed back to the instant date, December 1, 2010; 4. Then during the Thanksgiving Weekend when people are otherwise distracted just four days prior to the December Ise hearing, Mr. Richardson quietly released a "Memorandum" (which is attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated by this reference) that any "Reasonable -17- lvlemoIandum of Poing rend Authoriti: in Opposition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Man" would clearly interpret as moving the location of the hearing on the proposed ICOTV project. Ilowever, the notice posted on the subject property did not reflect the change in the meeting location (see the email attachecl hereto as Exhibit E and incorporated by this reference). This time when Mr. Richardson was caught, it is unclear whether the Memorandum was just grossly misleading or whether he just quickly changed the meeting back to the old location (see the e-mail attached hereto as Exhibit F and incorporated by this reference). Regardless of the actual events, the actions taken by Mr. Richardson, in the name of the Planning Commission, actually caused significant confusion as to the .lueation of the hearing. Regardless if that action was a deliberate willful attempt to mislead the public or just incredible stupidity, the confusion was real and effectively negates the propriety of the notice of this hearing and it should again be continued — this time until well after the holidays. 5, Also a couple ofdays prior to the December Is' hearing the Planning Commission posted on its web site for public distribution and dissemination the "Resolution" of approving the Development flan and CUP for the ICOTV Project (which is attachecl hereto as Exhibit 0 and incorporated by this reference). It clearly communicated that the decision was already made prior to the public hearing, and also had a chilling effect on further opposition to the project because of the perception that anything said would not be considered. In fact it appeared that nothing said in opposition was in any way given serious consideration -- instead it was criticized as "Bigoted", Racist and full of "Hatred". There are notice problems for each and everyone one of hearings for which it seems that Mr. Richardson and the Planning Commission have excuses for each failure, but excuses do not "cut the mustard". It is clearly an indication of very serious management failures at the Planning Commission, However, I must say that this is merely the result of rank incompetence rather than something more sinister that amounts to an actual attempted sabotage and subterfuge of the system. At a minimum, these notice problems along with the failure to make information fully available to the public, demonstrate an obvious and very unprofessional bias in favor of the proposed ICOTV' project and the intent to ram it through without regard for the will of the people, 18- Memorandum of . Points rind Authorities in Opposition 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 which is anything but an impartial review of the application. NO CONSIDERATION OF SU 375 The proposed ICOTV project does seem to give any consideration to SB 375 (Government Code Section 14522.1), the Anti -Sprawl Bill which is now law. SB 375 contains revolutionary changes in California's processes of regional planning for transportation arid housing — largely by mandating the creation of"`sustainable" regional growth plans. In that the proposed ICOTV project is very clearly intended to draw from a wide regional area. Accordingly, the project would most certainly have a significant effect on the all ready strained transportation resources of this portion of Riverside County, SB 375 requires that changes in the growth pattern that reduce overall driving — the proposed ICOTV project the opposite effect. Accordingly, the City or Temecula simply can not ignore the land -use planning requirements of SR 375 in its consideration of the proposed ICOTV "Sustainable project. It is required that aSttStainab[e: Communities Strategy" be created that lays out how the emissions reduction will be met. SB 375 requires for the first time, links regional planning efforts for transportation and housing. IV. CONCLUSION GEN N ERALLY: Based on the above, information, this Commission has totally and completely failed to put ICOTV on one hand, and Calvary Baptist Church, Grace Presbyterian Church, Saint Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church and other religious organizations on the other hand on an equal footing as is mandated by RLUIPA. Accordingly, the ICOTV project can not be approved in its current form without violating RLUIPA. CONSTITUTIONALITY: The handling of the ICOTV project by the City of Temecula Planning Commission showed a significant preference of the ICOTV project over the neighboring Christian churches as well as -19- MQ.mornndum of Points find Atit11oritics in Opposit lion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 72 23 24 25 26 27 28 other religious organization in the City, and totally and completely violates the "non -preferential" or "accommodation" interpretation of the ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. CEQA: 'I'hc "Mitigated Negative Declaration" IS NOT a proper finding of fact regarding environmental impact of the ICOTV project under CEQA and was adopted when the Commission clearly had actual knowledge that the ICOTV project would have very significant impact on the environment. MOSQUE PARKING: This Commission should have the courage to step f'orwar'd and establish a basis fi r determining the amount of parking that is truly adequate to the actual needs of a mosque and consistent with its theological requirements without adversely irnpacting the surrounding environment. INFRASTRUCTURE: If the proposed 1COTV project is to approved before the traffic, food control and other infrastructure of the surrounding area are adequately provided fbr, such improvements should he responsibility of the ICOTV as a condition of such approval, which could provide a right of reimbursement for a reasonable number of years. No NEED TO APPROVE BOTH APPLICATIONS: "There are two totally separate and distinct applications simultaneously before this Commission. There is no need whatsoever to approve then both at this time. To approve the First Phase (Planning Application No. PA08-0241) would not in any way adversely effect the Second Phase unless the concerns and objections were actually valid. In which denial of the application would be totally and completely appropriate at either that or even this time. -2p_ Memov nduni or Pointw'ind Authorities in Opposition 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Approving the application separately would give the City a change t0 monitor the impact or the ICOTV Project and take or require the mitigation of the consequents of the project. Separate approvals of the separate phases is exactly what was clone in case of the neighboring Grace Presbyterian Church, the second phase of which is still pending construction. If it was good and appropriate for the Presbyterians, why not the Muslims. In fact the failure to do so would be indicative of the preferential treatment that it appears this Commission has given to the proposed ICOTV project. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Dated. December 1, 2010 George F. X. Rornbach -21- memorandum of Points and Autiloritiesin .._._ OppU3ili0al 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 215 27 28 VERIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE j I, GEORGE F. X. ROMAACH, declare and say: I am over the age of eighteen years, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS, and my address is I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and if called as a witness I could and would competently testify thereto. I have read the POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION to Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08.0242 tiled by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY and I am informed and believe the matters stated therein to be true, and on that ground allege that the matters stated therein are true. I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 1, 2010, at Tenteculs, California George F. X. Rombach -22- Memorandum cif Points and Authorities in Opposition OiCand Water don't mom• July 11, 2010 Mayor Jeff Comcrchero 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, California 92589 Mr. Mayor, While the City of Temecula has before its council a proposition for the construction of a mosque for Muslim worshipers to meet; and the proposed site adjacent to a Christian Church, (located at 31087 Nicolas Rd. 'Temecula, Ca.) I would encourage each council member to consider how such a decision might well jeopardize the wellbeing and safety of the two already existing Christian Churches and the surrounding community. While there may seem some commonality between the two faiths; such as the lineage of both religions back to the prophet Abraham; yet, the peaceful coexistence of the two are not likely. Their differences are much like that of oil and water; such blatant disregard of these major differences and the well known fact that `Islam,' has sworn a jihad against alt Christians and Jews, shows irresponsibility on the part of any municipality that would consider such action. 'These concerns have been proven again and again down through the annals of history. To be politically correct in this decision could well prove disastrous. Let us not forget the blood letting at Fort Hood, Texas by a Major in the US Army, one who had been in prior months openly opposed to our effort in the middle -east to rein in the terror squads of Muslim extremists. Let us not forget how his superiors failed to take proper action against this officer; no longer a patriot, but a traitor to his oath to serve and defend our flag and country; indeed, his flag and country. Let us not forget their resistance to relieve him from duty, allowing him to continue to wear the uniform and rank of a Major in the CJS Army; all in the wont of being politically correct, not to offend the Muslim community nor bring more attention to his recent ranting against our mission in the middle -east. Another point of reference would be the following quote; as it pertains to the idea of building the Jewish "Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem alongside the Dome of the Rock: "Sheikh Abdulla Nimar Darwish, founder of the Islamic Movement in Israel, argues that it's pointless to discuss rebuilding the Temple until the "mandi" the Muslin messiah comes."Why are we taking upon ourselves the responsibility to decide such things?" Darwish said in a telephone interview with The Jerusalem Post, "Even Jews believe that it is prohibited to rebuild the Temple until the messiah comes. So what is there to talk about." Exhibit 'A' Page 1 of 3 Darwisll warned that attempts to rebuild the Temple before the Messiah would only result in mayhem. "As long as there is a Muslim alive, no Jewish Temple will be built on Al- Haram Al -Shari[`, The status quo must be maintained, otherwise there will be bloodshed." And yet, the move is on to build a Muslim mosque adjacent to two Judeo-Christian Churches here in the Temecula Valley; all in the expectation of a peace loving religious coexistence. Are we so blinded by political correctness and the desire not to offend that such potential risk or upheaval and mayhem are ignored? Does one really think that our laws against hate erimes will have any regard by religious zealots against those ofthc Christian or Jewish faith? Make no mistake those of the Christian or Jewish Faiths are infidels in the eyes of Islam; and Islam is sworn to their conversion or demise, We have Christians in our fellowship that have converted from the Moslem faith to Christianity; they are fearful of reprisals brought against them by the constant reminder — while seen attending services — of their dissent from Islam and conversion to Christianity. "There were at least 1,237 crimes committed against Christian churches and ministries in the United States this past year, according to a repot released Monday." "Included among the crimes are 12 homicides and 38 other violent incidents --- including three sexual assaults and three kidnappings — 98 arsons and over 700 burglaries, according to the 2009 "Crimes Against Christian Organizations in the United States" report published by the Christian Security Network." I am of the opinion that providing the means for a potentially volatile situation whether over the course of time by means of numerous incidents, or sudden; and that such a manifestation into something quite reprehensible is not what any city would want to be charged with, nor its political leaders held accountable; for such irresponsible actions. While discrimination is certainly the watchword of today's society; nevertheless, caution and sound judgment are the most prudent means in preventing an otherwise emergent catalyst for attacks and mayhem by those openly opposed to our Christian faith; given the culpable knowledge of the opposing issues between these two religions. This is the way of wars being started; and indeed, we are at war: and a religious one at that, over the very same opposing issues whether any want to believe it or not. What more need be said? Many °Cour congregation are military combatants and have fought against their Muslim brothers. Quite often our military members attend service in uniform wearing the decorations of veteran combatants in a war where many followers of Islam have died at their hand. While our Christian community is not thus engaged as the crusades of the middle -ages; yet we are at war with Islam, we do not wish to be anxious while attending our Christian churches here at home in America, We have been free from such intimidation of opposing religions for some two hundred and twenty years, till that tragic day in New York City; infamously known as 9-11 and for the past ten years there have been much violence and many incidents and threats against Christian America. We are still yet, a Christian nation, leastwise by the number of professing Christians; lest we allow wolves in sheep's clothing to come in amongst us; as they did by boarding our Exhibit 'A' Page 2of3 airplanes as peaceful Muslim passengers on that fateful day. Do we not take particular caution at our airports in screening for would be terrorists; all claiming to be other than the extremist radicals of Islam; yet their religion compels them to serve Allah and be obedient to all the edicts contained within the Koran. The first rule of combat is to know your enemy; and how easy it was for the despicable actions on 9-11 to take place. These Muslim insurgents knew their enemy and how best to attack him, by deception and surprise. Islam determined American civilians as their enemy and the Taliban set about to destroy us. Their agenda has not changed and we arc foolish to think that in every professing peaceful Muslim mosque there are not those that do embrace the radical side of Islam; whether there be few or many is a mystery. One has to wonder why this particular spot was chosen for their mosque; a property adjacent to a Fundamental Baptist Church; a church very active within the city, distributing tracts weekly around the city inviting residents to come hear the gospel message. No...1 think the prudent decision would be for the Muslim community to find a more suitable site where religious contention and strife will not become the primary concern of the city of 'Temecula. There is any number of reasons to deny the construction of this mosque on the property adjacent to Calvary Baptist Church: one being suitable parking..Members of the Islamic faith have already approached our church desiring permission to park in ori• parking lot. 'they were denied. It would seem this alone would be of major concern in regard to code enforcement. I'm sure there arc many viable reasons to deny construction at this specific location for a more suitable location. I believe Rancho Community Church was denied twice at two previous locations before obtaining portnission to build at their current location. C)ur concern is for the safety of our congregational members and property. Sincerely, John Church A Christian and Member of Calvary Baptist Church Cc: Ron Roberts Mayor Pro Tem Maryann Edwards — Council Member Exhibit `A' Page 3 of 3 ' d '0.11;y1A,461040 11 ,,,,,,h, i Ilk I II r)11,1 1 0 IIII 111110 min „od.„ 111,7,1 , Id 1111111,'"711' ; 11' n10[114" '1101 A "" AYORArio:', ill( 1111111111111111111111110111111 loomotooloommiooNlio Exhibit 'B' Page 1 of 1 Community Development Pion'lifig,Dirilolort 4:3200 1301000. Park Orlye • Temecula, GA 92690 P.O. Box9033 •: Temeoulk. CA92589..9033 fAX (904694-607 November 10, 2010 Mr. Hadi Neel 1610Mid Center of Temecula Valley 42188 Nod°, SUN A Torneouto, DA 82590 Dear Hadi As ws discuooed on the phone this afternoon, we were made aware that the pubilo hearing sign detailing. We public hearing for your project was accidently posted en the wrdrig property by the cltys, sign contrettor. We were not made aware of this until after It was too late to re -post the' sign on your property Within 10 days of the public hearing as required' by the Temecula Munitipal Code. Dased.on this, error, we have no choice but to re -notice the public hearing to the next Planning eemniission date which is December 1, 2010. I -Went toxt�nd Sincere apolegy"fOr this error, it was the Citys full intention to move, thIS z prejeot fOrwardie the „h ring an November 17, 200, The delay is only due to the error fn the -:publlo nOtlee process, and our support foe your project has not changed and we will be YecoraMendingPlannIng Commission approval of your request on December 1, 2010: Again; .I apologize for the delay in the public hearing, If you have any questions, do not heellatato contaetrne.ot (981) 506-5173 Patrick Richardecin, MCP Director of Pia.niting and .Redeveloorneat Exhibit 'C' Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE: December 1, 2010 SUBJECT: Change in Location for the Planning Commission Meetings Due to the recent completion of the new Civic Center, the Planning Commission Meetings will now be held in the Council Chambers at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. This change will constitute a permanent move for the location of the Planning Commission Meetings. The time of the regularly scheduled meeting will not change and will be held at the normal 6:00 p.m. hour. Attachment: Resolution Exhibit 'O' Page 1 of 1 Print Page 1 of 1 From: George Rombach To: info@escapingislam.com; karen1 cgojd 1.coru; Date: Mon, November 29, 2010 1:02:09 PM Cc: Subject: blit Hearing I have that letter - the wording could certainly be read that prior to public hearing the "City's" totally supports the project, such support has not changed, and fiil1 intends to move it forward. As to the Hearing Notice Signage, I was at the project property at Noon today, Monday November 29, 2010, the sign still shows the old address. George Rombach From: In escapingis:em.com" infui pingtslam.on> To: George Rombach jJ , karenlugojd@gmall.eom Sent Mon, November 29, 2010 11:39:08 AM Subject: Latest findingl Dear George, Dear Karen I lust oame back from Connecticut ter 9 ew York and sat behind my computer and I received this Email, The way I reed it, Mr. Patrick Richardson has already made his decision as of November 10th. Does this mean that their decision does not need public hearing. Then why public hearing? Am I right?. Please advise. Best Regareds Mono Bakh h ://www.lcotw.oroIwr cm ar�tem� t� m ..:. , +w 1. /0tt!iC "ti "-Pu Exhibit 'E' o http://us.mg2.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gX 18t.rand=fnacckhah3ngl d Page 1 of 1 11/29/2010 Print Page 1 of 1 From: info®escapingislam.com (info@a escapingislam.com) To: Info®escapingislam.com; Date: Mon, November 29, 2010 1:57:52 PM Cc: Subject: Correction, Meeting is in the old place Dear Friends, I had a phone interview with Aaron from Californian. When I referenced to the change of meeting location, he immediately called the Patrick's office and he confirmed that: Our public hearing for the mosque is going to be at 6:00 PM at the old place: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 B BUSINESS PARI( DRIVE The memo which we were confused with is written as part of the agenda to move the future meetings to the new location. So, please inform everybody that the meeting and the demonstration shall be at the firstlocation. Best Regards mano Exhibit 'F' http://us.mg2. mail.yahoo. com/dc/launch?. gx=1 &.rand—fnacckhah3 ngl Page 1 of 1 11/30/2010 PC RESOLUTION NO. 10 - PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA08-0241 AND PAN - 0242, A TWO-PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TWO-STORY, 24,943 SQUARE FOOT RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 4.32 ACRES WITHIN A VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE COLIBRI (APN 957-140-012) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 14, 2008, Stephen Sigler, Axis 3 Architecture, on behalf of owner, Islamic Center of Temecula Valley filedPlanning Application No. PA08-0241, a Development Plan, and Planning Application No, PA08,,0242, a Conditional Use Permit Application, Both applications were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on December 1, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as, prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241and PA08-0242 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, In approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Pian (Section 17.05.010.F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed use as a compatible use within residential areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; Exhibit 'G' Page 1 of As conditioned, the project has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the Initial Study process to further ensure that the project has been designed and appropriately conditioned so that it will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E) C. The proposed conditional use Is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; The proposed religious facility is located within a Very Low (VL) residential district, Religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in VL zones. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed use is for a religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. According to the City of Temecula Development Code, these types of uses are allowed in all residential districts upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Custom single-family homes surround the project on all sides with the exception of the east side. An existing religious facility lies to the east of the proposed project. As designed and conditioned, the project will not adversely affect adjacent uses, buildings or structures. E. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate In size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development. Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; As designed and conditioned the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features .required in the City of Temecula Development Code have been satisfied, As a result, the project will integrate into the surrounding area in much the same way as the immediately adjacent existing religious facility. F. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The project is a religious facility to be located in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. Religious facilities are a permitted use in VL zones with the Exhibit 'G' Page 2 of 5 approval of a Conditional Use Permit. As designed and conditioned the protect is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which contains provisions to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. G. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for the Conditional Use Permit will be based on substantial evidence In view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission, Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone, located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit as described in the Initial Study for the project. Based upon the findings contained in that study, it was determined that there was no substantial evidence that the protect could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on May 28, 2010, and expired on June 26, 2010. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. C. Two written comments on the Initial study were received prior to the public hearing and responses to the comments were prepared. The responses have been submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to 'and at the December 1, 2010 public hearing, and based on the whole record before It finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment: and (3) the mitigation measures required by the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Exhibit 'G' Page 3 of 5 E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PAM -0242, a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Collbri, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Exhibit 'G' Page 4 of 5 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 1st day of December 2010. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] Carl Carey, Chairman STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 1, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the ist day of December 2010, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Exhibit '6' Patrick Richardson, Secretary Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GEORGE F. X. I t ►MBAC .I, PhD, JD, CPA e-mail: 1101011.11.Ming Telephone: Facsimile: Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION FLANN1'.NG APPLICATION Nos. PAO8-0241 and PA0S-0242 (APN 957-140-012) APPEAL SECTION C EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT WE POSITION OF APPAEL Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 COMES NOW GEORGE FREDERICK XAVIER ROMBACJ1, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens, to describe the EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT POSITION OF APPEAL of the approval on December 1, 2010 of the City of Temecula Planning Commission of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PAO8-0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY that is submitted with the Appeal and/or will be presented at any hearing on the Appeal, which is as follows: -1- APPEAL, — Section C Evidence to Support Position of Appeal 1 1. Exhibit 'A' through '0' to the Points and Authorities in Opposition_attached in 2 support of Section B of the Appeal; 3 2. Riverside County Sheriff's Department Data Warehouse Report for reported 4 accidents at the intersection of Nicolas and Winchester Roads for the nearly ten (10) years ended 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 June 30, 2010, and extract from such report of the accidents for the Five (5) years then ended; 3. Petition of residents concerned about the traffic conditions in the area of the subject project containing over one thousand (1,000) signatures, and the Declaration of Brigitte Green in connection therewith; 4. Photographs of the parking at Calle Medusa and Calle Colibri; 5. Photographs of the parking and traffic at the Corona mosque; 6. Video of the traffic conditions at the intersection of Calle Medusa and Nicolas Road; 7. Video of the tra>F11c conditions at the Corona mosque; and 8. Such other relevant evidence that may properly come before the City Council at any hearing on this Appeal. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Dated: December 15, 2010 George F. X. Rombach -2- APPEAL - Section C Evidences to Support Position of Appeal RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF DATA WAREHOUSE REPORT ,JUL-20.2010 TUE OB:10 AF[ RIV SHERIFF TEMECULA PD FAX NO, 9616963010 02 From: To= Data: Subject: Maio R Mark Leggett Pat AgcaolU 7/16/2010 1:25 PM Collision Related !alio Codes 11-41: Fatal 11-80: Mator lrliury 11-81: Injury 11.82: Non-TJu y 11-82N: Non -Injury, No Road 8ivdc ye 11.828: Non -Injury, Road 8lodcage 11-83: No Details 20001: Hit & Run w/1njury 20002: Hit & Run '9,. Sim Y:M at) bt,UGrs t (404, C., IAA) aka ems` mr a lou /iv% vier es r - RANJ r2D G,. DIQr3 L.dIJV 14(9A- cT-S 4Izcrlio There's some enormous codes. Probably tYlm sudh as 20002P and 11-82P, but just drop the •12:1 'JUL-20-2010 TUE 08:10 AH RIV SHERIFF TEMECULA PO . FAX NO. 9518983010 Riverside County Sheriffs apartment Dais Warehouse Report Report by Address Men Jul 121817.05 Pt1T 2010 01/0802001 1100:41 01(11/2097 1717140 01/10/2001 1130:38 01/24/2001 07:201;48 02/9712001 18;31:00 02/0712001 18.30:40 03/23/2001 05:0012 04/1612001 13:30:00 001/18/9001 12:623 08/28/2001 17:51:44 05/10/3001 17,51237 06/39/2001 15:36:38 06/30/2001 22:3311 07/08/2001 15;28:05 07/00/1001 15:20:17 07113/2001 04:38:53 07127/2001 08:0415 05/08/2001 07:03:38 08105/2001 07:02:40 081202001 00:31;30 08017/1001 03:44.51 08/10/2001 07:32:4* 00/10/2001 12;54:50 10/10/2001 00:37:46 11/08/2001 701001 11/14>2001 17:32;10 11/23/2001 00:2515 12/20/2001 19:09:28 01/14/2002 0720:33 01/29/2002 07:28:48 01/20/2002 0728:00 01/30/9003 17:30:09 02/01/2002 2010:11 03/09/2002 09:23:04 03/25/2002 10:01:27 03/16/2002 07:00:18 03/90/2002 12:50:32 03/30/2002 00:40:33 04103/2002 11:43:14 00/17/2002 2227:18 08/2012002 16:21:22 07/0612002 13:52;63 07107/2001 12:18;46 07/14/2002 181021 07/26/2002 13:34:56 07018/2002 13:11242 1182N 11.0100110040 1182N TR -010110070 1188 TR -01010003A 1103 70-010240015 1101 T13-010300061 1141 T-010390080 1182 TE.010520014 11-82 TE -011040043 1182N TH-011090080 11-44 11-011380004 20001 11-011380042 90002 7$-011490083 1142 7E.011800112 1143 T%-011800041 1151 11-011900054 11-82 TE -011540020 1142 78412080018 11-81 11-012200027 1183 11.012200028 11-82 TE -013370002 1183 TE -012390003 11-82 TE -012030014 1182N 7R-017840070 11-02 • 'TE011030011 1182N 11-013080089 11.42 113-011230093 1183 7013270001 1141 72.413540092 1152N 11-020140009 1141 TH-090100007 1182/1 76.028280008 1152/4 TIE -020200124 11-81 TE420330125 20002 77.920640027 1180 T1420040085 11-81 1E420850008 11-81 1E1-020870061 1183 TE.020500006 11-07 /6020830058 1182N TE.021020124 1152NN TE -0247101$4 11-82 "I .021H70070 1122N TE -Q21050059 70002 Th -03195000 11.82 T0-02:2170052 20002 11.022070000 NICOLA8 RD WINCHES/VTR k10, TEM NICOLAS RP WINCN0$TER RD, TEM 'NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD 1 WMCHEarIR W. Tim NICOLAS RP /WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RP, T11MMECLII.A NICOLAS RD/ W1NCH88TBR RD, TEMECULA MESAS RP / WINCMEST_R RD, TEMECULA • NICOLAS RD l WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS 411 / WINCHESTER RD. TEM NDI;OI,A$ RD /WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICoLAI Ra 1 WINCNP$TER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD/WINCHESTER 1113, TEMECULA NICOLAS Rb /WINCHESTER R0, TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER ALL TLaMECLILA NICOLAS RD/ WINCHESTER RO, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER R0 TEM NICOLAS RP / WINCNER FID, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER IES"TER RP, TEM NICOLAS RD 1 WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD / wINCNE8TER RD, TEM NICOLAS ROI WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER R0, TEM NICOLAS RP /WINCHESTER RIO, TEMECULA NICOLAS /40 /WINCHESTER RD. TEM NICOLAS RD / IMNCIIHSTER RD. TEMECULA NICOLAS NO 1 WINOJIrSTER 113, TEM NICQLP,►SRD/WWNCHEWER RP, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD / WINCHeBTER RD, TEM NICOLAS / WINCHESTER NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA 27380 NICOLAS RD X WINCI4 $TER,UNIT 006, NI LA8 RP /WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER 110, TEMECULA NICOLAS RP /WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD / W INc 11ESTER RP, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD/WINCHESTER IID. TEM NICOLA8 RD ! WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER R0, TEMECULA NICOLAS R0 /WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD 1 WINCHESTER RO, TEM NICOLAS 110 / WINCHE5TE$ HO, TEMECULA MCOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RR, TEM JUL-20-2010 TUE 08:11 AM RIV SHERIFF TEMECULA PD FAX NO 9515963010 06/20/2006 0910''18 1181 06/18/2006 1117:08 20002 07/024005 1181:32 1189 07/0712006 14:76:08 11.52 07/31/2005 08 1142 07131/7005 080103 1183 07/51/2005 06:06:17 1183 08/23/2005 15:05:26 1192N 09/08/2005 19:05;19 1141 08100/2006 07`21'57 1152N 00/164006 14:47:20 1182N 08120/2008 14;11;09 1182N 02260016 16:13:46 1182N 00/28/2006 1840:51 1162N 00/2812008 2Z45:32 1182 10/1012006 12;27:52 1182N 10/14/2008 2019:43 1 t82N 1110212005 15:02:14 110281 11/14/2008 06:07:00 11.62 11/15/2009 00/06716 1142 11/1612008 12:16:15 11-01 11/19/2006 11:47:28 1102N 1210012006 17:24:08 11 S2N 12/13/2006 20;41:34 1102N 12/20/2008 2014:48 1182N ---- 41/04/20(15 21:2121 1182N 01/06/2000 114310 1182N 01/09/2006 11:32168 1181 01/101200016:46;11' 20002P 0241/9005 0140:17 1141 07/10/2006 14:08:10 1141 041141.2006 11:67:64 1181 06/01/2006 14:04:33 20002 05/22/1008 15:19:22 1182N 00/28/2005 16:0818 11-02 01/00/2006 23:05:07 20002 07/25/2008 18:61:29 11028 01/28/2000 23:11:31 20002 08/02/2008 08:00:22 1182N 0811912000 12:6145 11-81 00/30/2000 00:00:00 1142 00/01/2008 00117:56 1182N 08/19/2008 1649:46 1152N 00/19/2008 10/0130 1182N 10/024000 21:44:47 20002 1a/11/2006 161615 1142 104/2006 10/11:89 11821 10/20/2009 221021 20002P 11/084006 17:0140 1182N 11/09/2008 00051114 11828 11/15/2006 14:8198 11-62 11/29/2006 10/49:64 11-04 12/01/2000 015611 20002P 12/09/008 14:20:48 11828 12/00120116 07:110116 1142 12/08/2000 0714.00 11628 TE451400036 TE -001850054 T 18311111 TP451080193 78052120064 TE -082120039 111052120036 TE -062500140 TE -052610008 1E462620018 TB.052590111 TE -082830074 TE -062090130 TE462890128 TE710168 1E-052890070 TR -052670164 T8.069060066 TE -063100031 TE.053200052 1E-0532200/6 TE -0392900/9 1E4153490117 1E-085470130 TI -053540170 T6-060040105 79,090050168 TB060oWo18? TE..060100107 T8o80620041 TE -080090005 70461040006 TE -001210105 1E-041420211 It -0E1480137 TE -061890280 1E462070181 1E482070367 TE -062140028 TE -062280067 TE-002420iI28 YE -042444085 T5-082620164 1E40020184 78462180227 1EE.482840210 7E-082870151 TE -082930370 TI: -031001 SS T8.008120082 1E-063100181 70492030286 1E403350952 TEE -063370101 TE -063400070 1E465400071 NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEM 27216 NICOLAS RD X 1/IIiNCHESTER, TENT NICOLAS RD 1 WINCHESTER P0, TEM rictus RI51 WINCHES -ER Ftp. TCMPOULA MCOLAE3 RP / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RP / WIN0I1F6TFP P0, Tem NICOLAS Rb / WINCHESTER 50. TEM NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD! WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER R0, TMA NICOLAS RD 1 WINCHESTER R0, TEM 21215 NICOLAS RD X WINCHESTER, TEM NICOLAS PO / WINCHESTER RD. TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RD. TEM NICOLAS R0 / WLNC11EST it 1917, TEMECULA NICOLAS 571 WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAB NO /W1N0H 5TER 50, YPM 27218 NICOLAS 50 X WINCHESTER, TEM NICOLAS RD ! WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS 50 / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS R0 /WINCHESTER RD. TEM NICOLAS R0 / WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER 513, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP. TEM NIGQLAS AD/ WINCHESTER 50, TEM NICOLAS 501 WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEM 27216 NICOLAS RD X WINCHESTER, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER 50, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAE RD iINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RP / 21(1;116.6151 R0, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TOM NICOLAS 50 / WINCHESTER RD, TEMVCULA NICOLAS RD / WINCHWAR RD. TEM NICOLAS 141] /WINCHESTER RQ, TEM NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEM NICOLAS RD/ WINCHESTER RD, TBRICULA NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA 27215 NECOLAB 50 X WINCHESTER, 780,1 NICOLAS 513 / WINCHESTER 50, TEM NICOLAS 120 / WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD X, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NicoLAB ply / WINCHESTER 120, TEM NICOLAS RD 1 WINCHESTER RD, TEEM NICOLA/3 RD / WINCHESTER RO,. TLM NICOLAS 50! WINCHB2TEN 120, TEM • NICOLAO 5171 WINCIIEESTER RD. TEMECULA NICOLAS RD / WINCIII66TER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD! WINCHE87EI150, TEM NICQLA3 RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD. TEMECULA 11MCOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TSM 08 OL -20-2010 TIE OB111 A111 RIV SHERIFF TEEEGt)LA PI) i tOD. 951883010 0110212007 05:49:20 01102/2007 06:62:01 01111/2007 14:13:27 .01/12/2007 07:1215 01/12/2007 01;17:22 01/29/2007 17:61:20 02/03/2007 1942:31 02/0812007 10:25:44 02A5/ 007 10:26:20 02/18/2007 1245:09 02/1712007 21:18:45 02/19/2007 14;47:44 02/20/2007 122918 03/17/2007 20:45:55 03/2012007 07:23:45 0343/2007 l t:85:00 051021/007 20:24:00 05/02/2007 2027:15 00/1012007 16:21:22 06107/2007 0710:34 00/15/2007 132420 08/2312007 1238:40 00/24/1007 18:42.13 08/27/2007 0&30:12 00/30/200710:38:00 07/02/2007 1245:00 07/05/2007 18:57:32 07/00/2007 151041 05116/2007 13:03:24 0/20/2007 02'90-57 06149/2007 21:0021 08/20/2007 08:319).3 08126/2007 1219:00 00/0012007 00;05;47 09/45/2057 0845:24 00/10/2007 04:1913 09/10/2007 04:11119 091/2/2007 1194E80 09129/2007 23:36:31 10106/2007 10;61;18 10/13/2007 13:4235 10/19/2007 19;4250 11/03/2007 12:2233 11126/7007 13:0z26 12/044007 19:09:61 12/04/2007 181905 12/04/2007 16:12:47 12/08/2007 18:1 037 17/00/2007 10:2043 12/13/2007 18;01;05 12/13/2007 /711:31 12/15/2007 19:00:07 014141200A 2.0158:38 01/07/2008 18;21;54 02/01%2008 18:2180 02/12/2008 14:0019 1142 1102N 1182N 11-82 111122 20002 11822 11020 1182P • 1182N .. 11.82 1162P 11-52 1162P 11-02 11-82 1141 11-82 1102N 20002 1182P 114214 1182P 20002P 1102N 11-91 20002 1182N 20002 11828 1182N 1183 11828 11-81 11.82 1102N 11e2N 1102!4 1103 1182N 1102N 118214 118214 1182N 11-97 1182N 1182P 1182N 1182N 11-92 11820 11822 1103 115214 1152N 20002 TE -0700 TE -070020028 7E.010110126 TE -070120021 TE 070120022 118.01'0200103 1'04170340219 TE•070370091 1E470320090 TEAT 4070130 T0-070450247 72470800187 TE -070110123 TE -070780200 111470780020 70:-070820127 T5 -071220M83 TE471720280 TO -011380214 1'0.07160002* TE -071800126 Tli-071740069 TE -071780159 70-071780031 1•E-071810058 9'07071830118 TE.071990.135 70.071590077 TE -072280125 TEI072820029 TE -072320220 1E-070020 TE.0123000r0 704172480043 TE472480042 TE -072630025 TE -072830029 TE.072050210 TE.072710218 TF472700143 TP -072880070 T0.072320149 TR -073090111 7E47330017s NICOt.M R0 /WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA NICOLAS R0 /WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RD/WINCHeSTER R0. TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RV, Y RMEGULA NICOLAS RD !WINCHESTER R0, TEM NICOLAS R0 / WINCHESTER R0, TEM 27215 NICOLAS R0 X 1.NINCHE:$T0R, TEM NICaLAB RD /WINCHESTER R P0, TEM NICOLAS 110 / WINCHESTER RD. MM NOCOLAB RD / WIIINOH05T0R P0. TENT N11 0LAS RD / WINCHESTER R0. TEMECULA NICOLAS RA /WINCHESTER RG, TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER 10, TEM NICOLAS RD /WNOHaTER R01 IVA 'NICOLAS R0 / WINCHESTER R0, TEMECULA NICOLAS RP /WNNCHEBTER•RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RO / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS R0 / WINCHESTER RD TEM WINCHESTER R0 ! NICOLAS R0, TEM/ NICOLA0 M0 /MANCHESTER RO, TEM *WINCHESTER R0/ NICOLAS Rd. TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RP, TEM WINCHESTER fop 1NICOLAB RD, TEM 38715 WINCHESTER RDX NICOLAS, TIMI WINCHESTER R0 / NICOLAS RD, TEM NICOLAS RO 1 WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS RD ! WINCHESTER RD, TEM WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS RD, TEM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RP, TCM NICOLAS R4 / WINCHESTER RO. TD I WINCHESTER RD /NICOLAS RD. TEM WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS Ria. TEM WINCHESTER R0 / NICOLAS RP, TEM NICOLAS RD 1 WINCHESTF-R RD, TEMECULA NICOLAS R01 WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA WINCHESTER R0 / NICOLAS RP, TEM WINCHESTER RP 1 NICOLAS 410. TEM WINCHESTER R0 / NICOLAS RO. TOM NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RP, TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RIO. TEM/ WNNCHE811R RD/NICOLAS RD, TEM WINCHESTER X NICOLA0 WINCHESTER RO ! NICOLAS RD TEM WINCHEaTF-R Rd /NODOIAS RD, TEM 70.073380237 NICOLAS RD / WINCH6e7ER RD. TEMOOULA 10.073380238 WINCHESTER 110 / NICOLAS RP. TEM TR.073300236 WINCHESTER 4iP / NOCd4AA /10. TEM -m-978340220 vWNCHESTER R1? / NICOLAS RP.'TOM 113.073420046 NICOLAS 11011MINCHEBTSR R0, TEM 1R473470124 NICOLAS RD/ WINCHEETER Rd. TEMECULA TE -073470144 , 11WIN011S8TOR RP / NICOLAS 110, TEM TE -073520288 . NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEM 70.080040230 WINCHESTER RI)/ NICOI.A9 RO, TEM 70-083070108 NICOLAS 801 WINCHESTER RD. TIM T0-050360102 27200 NICOLAS RD X tMNCHESTER. TEM 70.080430141 NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER HO, NIM 01 "JUL-20-2010 TUE OD;11 A11 RIV SHERIFF TEMECULA I'D FAX NO. 9516963D1D 02/1412008 11:02:48 0310412006 14:1247 03108/2000 18.2832 OWI7/20D0 17:06:x6 09/2112008 14:4018 02/21/2004 16:02:24 43/25/2006 091432 04/21/2000 10:44108 04/1412008 14:03:09 01/1812008 00:4884 0511008 08:14:00 08/28/2008 07.4810 06/10/2008 14:66:00 06/10/2008 11;54:04 Oen 82008 08:80:00 00/18/7006 10:38:00 06/20/2008 21:04:23 07/03/2006 07;33:22 07/03/2008 13:0724 07/00/9008 17:40:58 07/10/2008 0x02:41 0712i2008 10:x&05 48109/2008 17:06:27 08/12/2008 1716:30 08/13/2008 11;24:00 0/2/20/2006 10:01:30 00/12/2000 17:13:80 04/12/2008 1714:09 08/12/2008 181,202 00/22/2008 16:20:58 00/23/2008 15168:08 10/01/2008 0837:49 10/14/2008 18:38:35 10120/200/ 01:1211 11/05/2000 12:05:11 11/08008 13:4817 11/1712004 It:23:14 11/18/2008 07:22100 11/21/2006 07:12:32 11/24/2000 10:50:07 12/00008 02:45:44 12/00/2004 14:48:47 12/10/2008 1051814 12/13/2000 17.47:41 12/15/2008 1418:48 12/19/2008 1245:47 01/07/2000 14:6831 01/1012009 17x47:04 01/20/2009 18:10:06 01/22/2009 19:34:48 01/24/2006 15:91:05 02103/2008 13:11!28 02/0611000 17:88:21 02/0642009 07:12:53 02111/2009 07:11:12 02/12/2000 1&34:04 1142 1142 1182N 1142 118214 1182N 11-02 1102N 1142N 1182N 1142 1182N 11-82 118274 1182 1142 1102N 11822 20002 114!1 1182P 20002P 1102P 116214 1182N 1182N 118214 1142N 20002 1162N 20003P 1142 11-81 1102N 1182N 1102P 11.62 1162N 1162N 1102N 20002 111713 1182N 20002P 1142 1142 11528 1142 11820 115214 1141 11.92 11-82 1102N 118214 11-81 TE -040460072 18.080840200 1E-088860166 TE -0607701r, 1E.060610129 1E-080810139 TE -000660044 TE 481120205 TR -081280202 1E481370083 1E-061400081 Th -081480080 1E-081620133 1E-081820004 TE -081840115 Tfi.061700208 TE -081720208 1E4111850053 TE.051560112 1E401910253 TE -082000025 18482040241 TS -062180128 TE -007250187 TE -082200009 10-002380048 73.062880137 1'3.062868136 TG -062580132 T!-082580197 TE062670127 7E-002750035 1E-052880226 7//00$020024 76.003100122 13083130127 T5-003220065 73„-063290029 TE -063280051 73^083200092 78483410026 7E-00$440127 TE -083450088 T5.009470155 13-0113600064 13.083540103 715-090070225 7E490180152 090180152 73.060200218 TE -080220208 TP400210111 7E-000140126 7370138 7'3-060370026 TB -080420024 716080420103 NICOLAS RD / W11c11E$TRR RD, AROMA NICOLAS RD iWINCHBVTER RD, 711MICULA NICOLAS RPI WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICOLAS RP / WINCH TER RD, TBAECULA NICOLAS RP /WINCHESTER RP, TDM 20025 WINCHESTER RD X NICOLAS, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, Tt M0 ULA ' WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS RD, TEM IMF/CHESTER RD / NICOLAS RD. TEEM NIGOLAS RD / WINCHESTER an, TEM NECOLA2: RP 1 WMN:RW(1 R RD, TEMECULA WINCHESTER RD INICOI.A8 RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA A NICOLAS HP /WMNCHESWJ AO, TEM NICOLAS Rol WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NI0OIAS RD 1 WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS RD, TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RO, TEM WINCHEOTRR RD / NIGOI-AS RP, YERA NICOI.AB RA / WNC j1ESTER RD. T EMFCU1.A WINCHESTER RD / NICOLA9 RD, TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RP, TEM WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS RD, TEM MOOLA8 ROMA/CHESTER RP, TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS 30. TSM NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER Rd. TEM wWNCHESTER RD 1 NICOLAS RP. TEM WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS RD. TEM WINCHESTER RD!NICOLAS RD, TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RD, TEM 27,215 NICOLAS 3DX WINCHESTER, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RW, TEMECULA NICOLAS RP / WINC11ESYEK RD, TEMECULA WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RD, TEM NICOLA9 RD / WINCHESTER RP, TOM NECOLAW3 RP l WINCHESTER RD, TEM NICO LAB RD / ININCt1E ST3R RO, ¥EM8CULA WINCHESTER RP / N1C0LAS Ru, TEM NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER RD, TEm WINCH3$TER RD / NICOLAS RP. TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RD, TOM WINCHESTER RD/ NICOLAS RD, TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICULAI R0, TEM WINCHESTER RD 1 NICOLAS RP, TEM NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER RD. TEMECULA NICOLAS RD/ WINCHESTER RD. TEM COLA WINCHESTER RD 1 NICOLAS RD. TEM NICOLA/3 RD / WINGNEBTER RD. TEMECULA 11143 NICOLA9 RD X WINCHESTER, TEM WINCHESTER RP 1 NICOLAS RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCH ITER RD. TEMICULA NICOLAS RD 1 WINCHESTER RD, TEmEOULA NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA 40212 WINCHESTER 3D X NICOLAS, UN NICOLAS RD / VIANCNE 21EK RD, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER Rd, TEMECULA -JUL-20-2010 TUE 08:11 Ati R1V SHERIFF TEMECULA PD FAX N0. 95169$3010 02H4r2000 11;16112 07/ i 1/20011 1900:39 0246/2000 00:60:00 03/08/2000 09112:26 03/10/7009 0816:00 03/11/2000 13:44:23 03/13/2009 12.46:119 04/0212000 14:52:28 04/11/2009 191010 04/14/2000 072426 04/22/2009 221011 04/000 1718:48 04124/2000 07:32:2a 06/194009 10;65:49 0&2412U00 19:48:00 Os10ArA00i1 16:$0:24 06115/2009 15101$ 07/05/1000 18:50:01 07/0412000 151015 07/10/2000 15:0014 07/11/2006 01:09:25 00/03/200014:18:26 08/20/1006 12:39:41 005/2008 181817 00/09/2000 1011:08 09/17/2000 12:07128 06022420011 17:x5:38 09120/2000 17:65:01 10/01/2000 18:27:02 40117/1000 11:3x:13 1011912009 11:0219 10/30/2009 10015 11/10/2009 17:40:19 11/11/2000 17:80:48 11(30/2000 05:48132 12/07/2000 12:13:02 12/05/008 16:0040 12444000 13:27:45 01/03/2010 14:40:00 01/12/3010 07:30:00 011144010 13:41:18 01/21/2010 1431014 01/2542010 13:12:00 01/29/2010 19:00:57 02/00/2010 10:00:46 02/05/2010 191222 02171x2010 13:01:27 03/03/2010 19/48:40 03/0012010 11±11:37 03/12/2010 18:1818 03/14/2010 11:34:30 03/34/2010 10:1610 03/25(2010 10:07:07 04/02/2010 1+147:28 04/02/2010 14:3711 04/0618010 10:00:20 1182N 20002 11-02 11d2N 1142 20002P 1182N 110714 1142 11-12 110214 1141 1102N 1102P 1142 1101H 11020 20002P 20002 1187P 1182N 1182N 1142 20002P 1142 118214 1192N 20002 11.80 119214 118214 11828 1182 11829 118214 1182N 1142 1142 1141 11-02 1102N 1182N 1182N 114)x14 1141 119214 1102N 1183N 20002P 1111214 1102P 1142 1182N 1141 1153 110211 TE 000450143 700601404 711090600465 7'E-090080007 70.090090015 78.090700127 7E000120100 TE490920144 T0-101120085 70401040030 M001120200 T 4191130218 75.001140022 764101300112 7E491440188 TE001840128 TO -001080149 1E491440125 T5-091870126 T6481010113 70.091980032 T5-092150101 76462320111 TE092000145 70482460068 T[~ 002000081 TS -092720107 TE -092720109 TE 092810135 7<t-092900071 75.062910086 TE.009030192 TE -493140183 70.098150221 TE403340020 TE -093410045 10.003420114 TE 0035100110 71-100000004 7E-100040148 T8-100140110 TE -100210103 TE -100280074 Tr -100290151 113100880124 TES -100960137 TE -100610098 TE -1001120282 TE -100880074 T0-100710180 TE -100780008 TE 100830103 701.100840186 78.100920090 TE -100920100 TE -100250091 WINCI1E3TER RD / NICOLAS RO. TEM WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS RP, TSM NECOLAt3 50 / WN1 H0Sl1R RD, TEMECULA WNCHP81WJ RD / NICOLAS RD, TEN WW2 RD / WINCHESTER RD. TEMDCULA 39808 WINCHESTER RD X NICOLAS, TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER R0. TEM WINCHESTER RC ► NICOLAS RR TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA NICQI-Ag 50 / WWNOHSS1 ER RD, TEMECULA 1'E19$;RELOCA;NIC0LAS x WINCHESTER RE NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA RD / NICOLAS RD. TEM WINCHESTER 50 / NIGOLAS RD. TEM NIl ULA$ RD / WINCHESTER RR TEMECULA WINCHESTER RP / 141COLAE RD, TEM NICOLAS RD /IMNGHO8TSR 50, TEM WINCHI-&IER R0 / NICOLAS RD, TEM WINCPI 1 N RD 11410+2 RI), TEM 27256 NICOLAS RD X WINCHESTER TEM WINCHESTER RP / NICOtA$ 50, TEM NICOLAS R0 / WINCHESTER 50, TOM NIOOLAS RD / WINCHEESTFR RD. TeMoCULA NICOLAS RD /WINCHESTER RD, TWA NICOLA5 RP / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECUTA 40212 WINCHE8T0R RD X NICOLAS, TEM WINCHESTER RP / NICOLAS RD. TEM NICOLAS RD I WINCHESTER RP, TOM NII,:OLaS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA WINCHESTE=R RD / N10017A8 RD. TEM WINCH5S1'ER 50 / NICOLAS RP. TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLA8 RD. TEM NICOLAS R1 / WINO*( 2TER RC, TEMECULA WINCHESTER 50 / NICOLAS R0. TEM NICOLAs RD / WINCHESTER RD TEM WINCHESTER RD / NIGONI$ RD, TEM NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA NICoria 0 / YWNCHEBTTS 50, TEMECULA NICOLAS R0 / U,lNCHBSTEiR RD. TEMECUM NICOLAS RP / WINCHESTER RD, TEMECULA WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RD, -rem WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RP, TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RD. TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS RD. TEM I4ICOLM 50 / W1NCHM_STER RD, TEMECULA WINCHESTER RP /NICOLAS RR TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS R4. tam NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER R RD. TEM 27200 NICOLAS RD X WINCHESTER, TEM 27270 NICOLAS 50 X IMNcHESTER, TOM WINCH66T8/t 1117 / NICOLAS RD TEM NICOLAS RD / WINCHESTER RP, TEMECULA 21215 NICOLAS 50 X WINCHESTER, TEM NICOLAS R01 WINCHESTER 50, TEMECULA WINCHESTER RD 1. NIGOL.AII Rb. TEM WINCHESTER RD / NICOLAS R0,'TEM *JUL-20-2010 TUE OB;fl Afl RIV SHERIFF TEHECULA PD IAX HO, 9516963010 04112/2010 07:115:50 1142 101020412,k,111C101:414 SOY WtHC MEMO* 04/1e/2010 1613;10 110= 016110146 WINCHESTER IRO I NI no TOM o.sintaio 1t42,se 1152N TE\101110102, NI OIAS tkANCilg Wit flpaptor, ) \ A 0412412010 1011:t311 *1 -111,iti ,01 :0`,110,61140044 411 Q1004 NCH RAD, TEM 000/2010 23:MW 11112r: 4 TE -10121/0303 WI tietnien 1141 RO. TEM 09/03/2010 03:28,48 1141 T15.10125001 t NICOLAS FM /1A5NOHO8TER RD, TonpuLA sonansio 1418.18 114S TB.101300055 NicoLAB RP r wINDNESTaR RD, TEMECULA 06115/2010 15;5314 1182t4 11-101550079 WINCHF.GTER ROI NIC RD, TEM 08/1612010 145034 1153 TD -101380119 wirmarraft ROI NICOLAS RP TEM 05/2312010 is:55:25 11,81 TO,1214150022 NICOLAS RD ANINCHINITOR RD, TSLIF-CUIA 05/2612810 1828;88 118214 TE -101400040 WINCHESIER P0I NICOLAS RD, TEM 06/11/2010 125204 1152N Ts -101520w 25650 WINDFIRSTSR RD X NIOOLAS,TFM ei2010 11:3500 1142 1E-1010011130 NicotAs RD WINCHESTER RD, MACULA 00127=10 15;0413 1152N Tr.101760559 NICOLAS RD / WINCHE5TOR RP, Tem Mi2$/2010 10:47:20 118214 , TE -101800104 WINCMOSTER RD/ NICOLAS RD. Tam • • CITIZEN PETITION tl ranr41 m1 1 1 1,g. d v* 4§t1 -li 4 pg %, 1 ii :1 1 4 tx) 0 I1 0 44 a M i 4.1 bb od �O 0 pjp�'d :q° o 2 ° �o� w 4 iii p p 44 0 g.1in U V 0 4'1 V R1 �I O fr--' Nlav72 i'apoi FF 0 4=1 d 03a o 8 E f ffi k O 1.0 ,WM l f. g r' 4g fi 4.1 D' o 4 a 4 0 0 Cr - 0 U O U li “s u J 1 11 il 4 ii 1 A r„ 0 gt.. 6 0 cd A 41 Z 0 U 141 O L) ic! 11 1' gd 1 ick4h II/ e 0 8 ��a 1 1 1 S tri tgi �i t g 11 Fi 8041 A J11111 lilf 6101 441i 1 I ry 1 t k 18itt t tol E. it J1I 5- I lk Iv p IZ. 91 t eal 6 12 lg 4' 1 iz Vi 1 'b a a k iu m 8 "" o �e Q &le N ill 1 1 i'4 1 III ill :' .F ill g w 13 ow 111 i amt 12014 g 14": 1 1214P 8 '411O Aio 1 sitAN9 !M = Rail pi d ROD la z 44 lm- t.....›, 8 Ibillril 1111h Iti mug z5 m U i j , 4 ga a ENS PETITION O a 0 116 4.9 1112 111 Z Ot W � s lUge v m Li! Lig tg ch EAd 4.9 ire' ti 1 li 9 li 11 41i (. U vc16. .at ij 644 1 b 4 Egig 0 bA� 3 vo cs o 01 fp rgli 1 ! 4 114 a s EA NS PETITION 0 Lig th :51i t -Q Pt '8 gll i 4. § 1 e) o . 1 1 01 0 64 d 4,4. U i O kza Iht 0 A Cr- qi I Es rH '41 ei gl 1 il::,IM k id O t.,1 0 Es A °i , .._. vl 44 Ho 1. di r i 1 401;c71 pnilli qiWk Ri Mit8A1 1,414.1404izi e' 2X01 ti O '2 o co � }c'y ,7 M u Alifyi MI lita g% i!Ws.mbP. 8 402?)Slam A/IMMO nalo 4-i 14 1 taI o 1 A hIi 3 1 th 04' 4tiTA 111 a4.og PFitO a C§z orgot,,o, 4-taij Atba". 2 0 1541 gun 8 h 414 U bio" z gA 0 c,) CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO u 11 11 A .r. a� 1. u 6 m 44— 0 • t cry tLIP N AupCL) v c cV 464 4-1 r 8 cis 1 a 'ts .'",24,14-1V fo � ins Mo A O A I. rel tif 41, .tv-g Itcq .gk2 t•ma .5111 It Pi 51 I 2 ._11 1 0ill es, la a Og ;,1, Agri1 l av Av 8i N440.-kh , IFN121 eJ el01 ,g, tO ,, 0 ..4 ,,1 filg° v hi g g 11,,, ''4) A W t b 40.1c.) r$ . 0 1 z 0 0 0 i _. 4�I � hl 0 w col 0 g 1.4 stA i oI N rd 0 , o ;2 (g p,Q o Sai .r 8 t ifi te A' .M o 4,0 g jg in ! 0 0'05t y 0)688 b '-'' "gm O ^1 zo a 0.64 m 0.1 0 U Q) Fal gig 100 4-0 g up a 75 0 ° • ti g 0 K. ao a g a? o b d§0 a o ti) 11:42 z 1.4 -44 b m Q a P U A 1 1 'a %, t .4 ki gl 11 J St UR g A A' n �+- 4.11 1 V " g r s. I. C6 N .4 if io 6 i $ - 41 0 ovirg. .1. --Jt) •. m 'Per o pi t itIlliOt 6 fii.t1 4 CI I 11:03 [ AtIll m 481 ILdh 81110 z411 'Pw p sta a v (13 4 a EcI 48 a § a d a N om. 1 4-1 Ottrigt, N 6 4 O � N p , 4 N .11 1 v li �118 ;,, 4 v i PICc''S 0,„k) o s 1l 1! i z 6.1;,,A0 1.4 :L'.. .i. 1.4'R .4.0 1 NIA Ai FA cP.. 1 0 0 & i Vill 423 .201 t 8IflRI Til o g V E 76 46. c. as tr 1 4, s tER N EIZ ::Cq a . q. qa ,m41 O � F 51 001 VVb A 121 g5 val. to a rd.v 40 :4 .blu A ii2 Aiw lei 411 141 tt,1 lrn-gq -§!50— Cql o 1 20.H align aw° 111! 2 c.. 4 1 A 0 L) 0 -00 gr o 0 cj'a 0 2 o O et D4'!' I ll 3 § in .1�' ,973 4,4 .4 14 o 4A1 Gil -MOT) y 26v2i N 1'•i •N Ulaarclm4L1 c°078 LH -g gbA " ,gv 0 o ,-,t • y• 8 M cu fl a dI ' rO o O 8 ▪ ti b R. Frig k V V N ,8 a A 4 a a k. o ca4s0 .o O 4 gagilay b GSA 411 8 '; Ilk j gt d P, b Ap8 'ZmIl 0 (41 glil o tii S Z1J. Ew g le. ai.A m 4.• q' g4 g I, w 11111A ,1 wo lagNie 4.4.0.1aiW 616APRil gAlpt4F1 5ss ogliv›Am4tva o 101Durii Rgo.s +oL Worki814 obWg8ii 2 m,g it451174a8 .11 i ;ill !'),4 ,.., a o - ;1°''GNU 8 f4omplF4PA42h4roilailPiN11 0 0 LIR g Ale A IgA C iP 7p4 leitt,(1 t. ,014 lqi4t;A 8 gtil IV* IDD!iIb 1 uas. 043114pg 14 • .*., v•f8j c 3 Pco 1 IRA §D log co 4,1 0 §Rifigt ;78. §471 .01i 4.4.sa4o s t� 111 II It ei I - J 1 tb-1 b 1 14 gt 1 tg u 11 411 1 a 1 i II ill§' lit leigt; Q . LIR PA 1 114Wili 11111115 111"41 AcoIV§ a tI $ ot II1Pit 2„..11 opal!41 811411114tli _ � r" ki, fg 1° .1§11 ig 14611Q 'grJ 1 i, 41; VI " eda 411 i 08 Vit. 0 itm 4-i,g 1" 4 8A l j.hj (5121Ati 1g4".A ie.5.5p o. 1 LA S -.V z Qi 4-i4N kie°' Mt F1LA dd 001 Q 414 a A as a g §4 U 8 '0 g a 044 44.0.i14"" 4 c34 g I AltAiN 0 2004. oo o g .717,R2 8 4 filul AAN 2e g lAi 00 0 oESM la w v CH .• > I .E -i c.4 C. .E c{l A t,,j o e 60 4)1 ° AllT rin ut O I11• ,JD „a flh 0° x ;4 gag g,4. E—, 8 -' (1-.' -g- iv:IWAig 64CORill skt O a o 0 05' A 29 0 111 IV .41 ;00108c, LI 0;Ae7)mIglo 0 OVAVR6-' Cid 1Elt lmggi tm. luilgpig4t: 18404 ElLgIal.r11 w Nu 0 o .10 °4v�OHO ,U tgb212A"-PO g' i 1 Am 1 g ttS 4Zi 11.4 g t 4 a ti ao t 004 a P I 1 g' O o aA 6 b .5.1 L ti..,,„00 v4.8 0 • a,6 g (4i° _tto 14 gzePV. n duio • U 0 " di • IJ b ,4' 2. r 0 1710., -• 11 ptig mo§g O R2ig hi U g w 4 m v, c44 p,�,� j H "n v, . , .0473"w VIII:Log CA4p4.-Q°4 c'dloola— ID pad 11'o1 U O an kl.41:218114 22V510R1- ,111,11; a §,.; 41 o *� m . mf b O .5.84� b El4gav,”:qsA z4igq0L,1 yg0,14401 gl 'E'1 a 2' m� z L) 618 Ili 1 fl; 11! k ill fh 1144 ItIV Ili lA.9 AgglAae SAillalia 141-4111g Es ,a a Q AlIAltgemi 4•ii 1 ,A2 2 0 z Lei a —'d... art O 0 ra ati 0 W 4 4,26, U pp 'b ..4g pt) o Hag, • y p 14 Crg ' yIcH N 1.a z il 'cus 1 .t .4 t 1.41 0 4H et Pitir O o.ba°8�o � o � 1 a gVg Wi86 g°hil qU it'll 4. t' fo U w ' O a3 N U 71) O •a z 4 ”511 i 1 :-.15,10 .t 11 t ti ii A t 1 0 4.11 Fal ° a 0 c) " gl4 --2a44 E- °11 4111 0 qt 1 ' t4 be o. 12 A 0,4 8 j'l 0 =4 O 8 E Q 4 tom+ is a..+ S M. ID w ti g 8 q i Q. §. z9 cua..yyt.0.t -•tA. 1:4+O oc2, .,,.41 gl a' 1 L40 0" cicei R§918 0.4=ie 8 2 § 1 i ,§ 8. IJrijt 1 0 vo 74 4 to 1I 0 'a N ca, as 0 flij•' rO 6 "aib o Et O a GA, gA u .4 t a 24 a • ai ,d o 648 o 0 — ra4 0 i A" abb La T 14 4 � a jij .� 4 ,� -421au g:8 MIldii m - 0 [f} 4.y y 49 8,41k 0 r� yH pi Q, �-1 pt 101 c q/D008= Q m eNts, 641' 4 ta?, 8 PR V •2 8 IA X91 ijI 15 4 15 Ion). th 2 a fI1 ,'d� 1 0 vt. E KIP t a 00,04 40) El A 0 a 0 4M° 8 Oby is '0 Vel g 04 Evg le ] 'ai Aillg M W d4liaD. ;.4_... o X22 C.) VIpe CI ig:0 'L0 .o, Tula v" ghh l i=i al E ThE Nom; 0 • 2 IN 8 8 Rug Z a N a rn g a U A /l?rith-1 7•S CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION 1La sly Of To mteula has the responsibility to enforce all City Code& and Ordinances fat the safety and w illtrm °fits citizens. The city ern ensure that no oily codes or ordiuic.e aro violated. This Is to ensure that rake lwelr, traffic congestion, parking problems and other iasoat do not afoot the tranquility of the residential area in which -this facility exit. Additionally, coo havo glove concerns shoat seta this pmjectwlR negatively impact the many meniral species that inhabit this area. There It► a fsctlity being planned for the 31200 block on Nicolas Road In Temecula. The fitoillty Is a 25,000 square fbot Mosque and Islamic Center situated on 4,3 auras and will accommodate op to 1,31 I people Wo; the minders ; n ed citizens, aro very mooned that this proposed facility poses numerous problstne, 6naluding Iso : „ ,;ittg: 1) life and sty 2) calm pollution, 3) tnif0c tion; 4) patkias gems; 5) nmttaut onnent o[rpealaa; and 6) quality ofllfb. 'We strongly or „ . the City of Tenaoouis deny the Continued Use Permit for this development, of my other development that Mufd negativity affect aur residential mem. Printed Name sissaanlre Address 7mrdro.iaNwref'dYkpeaky, a4drlrWormattenprarobiadhawwnhmwguarantddand?mega ander the Ftnf4awtaktnr old.* Conmtatros of the Wird Motu efAmerfco Plow malt to POBox 64 Munknt G 92564, www.coasemedcommuoItyoltlrom.wm all 4b. o 28 cr, P asi p.8 2 boob al31, I" ql iV) x PI b § U ,0 G c81 ca Ota n5 t,`,° ;'.41.g F A4 tiuw ar qij g g ' 4414721104 cNi24H1 �z� '�,tea 0 ovizrago 40 4 Q 0 d A1.2, ' viaLrg Oma, o? ,� • U all 2 a 8 Q moo ' r : t v X06041tgVY):0 g gtIlgt;OW'.g. ij o hi,4 mv .C) -8 , 4-1 . > iv 000 bi) 0 VI oom '081 cs1 E%41,.,,, 075rill M Aa QAa� b a it A -4 .0 .1:4 ,h4 ua .41.1; Eimmtap LIU so. Iloilo '04VIA -m 4 qb i2W 1443..co e 8 diij- nA y tog 4 A1. 0 0. 0 U rNX4 o A 411 N; 41,�.AA ,00 kl°4 AV gti flig gg ;� t 67, 171,b 1h :y VA tifvelg244 Pg ligv . re.grar4 te+ 6i0 Uff�� ti170,§01 4 i,014;1141 p ao !I j1il u g got...4iigtia • C) C.) § %Oa !hal n a) cri O oA N b a o 0 g If! w 1 AgT 4 4� p ccCC Ea Q 1 H °IVAE. .1,=Agg 4' 0 to 43,081.4g r"� 0— o ° 4 a i 11 d 191888 404, ,Z414-514 +� ��j 4w LS U U ial C.)m `�' ;c1 10'Scii% U 04-1g ��4y..8 �4. lgigiigre)°E424 § w El A m tl 4 "N. tg .41 A 11 0 1 uct it m o1 A 41 I d H 1 e.I .121 At id ; ih Ntk § 111 Ili 1(1 lei O ill :" Ili 0 Al.1 41 Itt FA A'gg4 i 0, 1.4a,�... ..1 . 4 Iiighlit 0114,[xl O 111i11111 t • 5311-t §I u pi ou hillr-7z 410 4 NtIliO IiHi1III t .g' it oiliot cga c,151.40dracg ill 4 gi ffi ° oas . w N N Iy d' 1 I •d tcf ,4t cA ',1 i 0 — H 0 ch 0 c9 0 g� t s » C' N 0. U a b ' 14. Mrs, do 1� 0 y2 woiE NS PETITION a fraz 0 9 z 1 I A r` d slrA V 1 1,1413 tot $, g a 1L) 414 6 a 1 m 1 4 43' 11 kfa S4 a 6. ENS PETITION 0 L) V Ctr--• ts-t• Id o 1 z1 .11 z C� U ;, fi DECLARATION OF BRIDGET GREEN 1 GEORGE F. X. ROMBACH, PhD, JD, CPA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e-mail: Telephone: Facsimile: Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION In Re: ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY I, BRIGITTE GREEN, declare as follows: PLANNING APPLICATION Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 (APN 957-140-012) DECLARATION OF BRIGITTE GREEN AS EVIDENCE TO PURSUANT TO APPEAL - SECTION C AND IN SUPPORT THE POSITION OF APPAEL Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 l . I am a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and if called as a witness I could and would competently testify thereto. 2. I make this Declaration in support of the APPEAL of the approval on December 1, 2010 of the City of Temecula Planning Commission of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY (hereinafter referred to "ICOTV"). -1- DECLARATION OE BRIGITTE GREEN Evidence in Support of Appeal 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3, I am responsible for and directly involved with circulating and collecting signatures on a Petition of local residents concerned about the traffic conditions in the area of ICOTV project. 4. There were more than one thousand (1,000) signatures of residents obtained on that Petition. 5. I went to the old Temecula City Hall on December 1, 2010 to testify at the Public Hearing of the City of Temecula, Planning Commission Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08- 0242 about the regarding the traffic conditions in the area of ICOTV project, and to present a true and correct copy of the Petition that had over one thousand (1,000) signatures. 6. When I arrived at the old Temecula City Hall for the Public Hearing, I had the true and correct copy of the Petition that had over one thousand (1,000) signatures in possession. 7. While I was waiting at the old Temecula City Hall to testify at the Public Hearing of the City of Temecula, Planning Commission Application Nos. PA 08-0241 and PA08-0242 the Petition was among my personal belongings. 8. Without my knowledge the Petition was taken from my personal belongings by person or persons unknown. 9. I conducted extensive search of the old Temecula City Hall facilities and made inquiries of all persons in the area, and no one acknowledged to taking the Petition or seeing anyone who did so. 10. I am informed and do verily believe that the Petition was deliberately STOLEN for the express purpose of preventing me from tiling the Petition with the Planning Commission. 11. I did in fact testify of the facts in this declaration and the traffic conditions in the area of ICOTV project. 12. After the Public Hearing on December 1, 2010 I did file another true and correct copy of the Petition with the City of Temecula, Planning Commission, however the later filed copy of the Petition did have additional signatures than those on the copy that I had with me at the Hearing on December 1, 2010. -2- DECLARATION OF BRIGITTE GREEN Evidence in Support of Appeal 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above facts are true and correct. Dated: January 6, 2011 -3- DECLARATION OF BRIGITTE GREEN Evidence in Support of Appeal PHOTOS OF PARKING AT CALLE MEDUSA AND CALLE COLIBRI .11111g" 111' • -.e. P-44,44. 4."4r4 4 ft • , - :44 • .44 MOMS_ ...441110444, 44h.* • _. •• - , .14Loplimommainiml . .• 0 s s s • \ ......• ... . ,- . . . _ ,•,' --"'"•"m11111111111 • • . 4 • I i 1\ , 0 ?',\ 1 A 4 . I i i . ..,. .. . •. , . . , . , i . . , . . IPw . I\ R —5111-1. • . e. x � 4L:.• ;1'. .ii- .�M! fir. °. .....0.0.• �,rs ow :�,�1'�� ?'� � • fir. 411, o,ia .,d. Iv •,fir fy `r r ,_ +a Ili _ 0 rl 1 � it F it � l / f Ail 1 . ' - a 41 l 0 ; 0 'r. �f 4 e -fir- 14Mme` ' 1 izihr .4111P�.i ',,oAL ... ii i l'' S. � '~ r I. 1>. Fri! rt it 2 402 f y. / - 7 i' 242112 x_ t y .m • Iii t : M �r rr... • 1 ,..it. .*or ,- .,,.,A4-.4 . .4,. ,,,,,,., id,' 14• . ' 1,1114:: f31' ry! - _ - _ i V. t4t-”tk • • I . I Y .y 0 fry . k G ,, ,,,i t .,. . ..t. 4-- 4Y,F •...ib_114pik r T7 - • I ■ 0 , 11 _ �� i. I 1 Jill* 4 • .. . . 1 , .. . , . . ..,_ • pr, r - te• -; am . .--...J- r Aima a IP r�r �- 0 -. • --,, • •"„ :.,.. # . . , ..-.. 7 . . -44 • . . , 0 r ^__ 1111111110W - _____.......iiimr_igiiillillillillib- Ill, '�. •• • 1 r. I ' h - - - i S t �� it • _ 4"- • ,; . . • - - 0 PHOTOS OF TRAFFIC AND PARKING AT THE CORONA MOSQUE 1 t,M. 71 ?! 0i An / r M 74.11;... all / 1 • 1704 4- I , _ 4, I. r e r a L . — • f y Z ', Ate• , r+ ; , ` ` I .41* y4I7 —.....s ,.., 4._ . ..- -,.. r 1 3, i _ i ami:t .� - — _ 4.`1961 -1 .1'"... • . ' II, i 0 . IP...' . lltIIIIII1/4 NI.It. I ,. , 4 , '' 1 1 I Oil 4„04 ,.: . _ ... ., _ . . • ,... . ,. •,,, - .40' -r -- - •=t .. .._ ._. _ .. -- ....1"- Apr , ` - rai•staPhlig% ."'h MIIIIE __ - . .. _m-ila.' , ilMineadnedillIddila Mg - - .................----- ---- - ; — ' Naar • ., ,.. -,..,.., :- R&•r4?.'.. '''''•: ', --- ' • - -- - •••• - • : 6.*--'7 -•'- .-- ....- "Ihr .. . _______ --- - 1 -...._, - +411..... 0 ,• ',... 4 . .. . • AM _.. .. .... % . 40 .- .,• ,. . . : ....... t , I _ :- -'•". I , . - ii, gait - ---lh• .......1. h s'---"4-4,c%"•-•.--- _ - -...---- -irlitrPill-i -4-44e'- - .--. ••• _ _ .. ...• -.,, _ - - ....... ... ... __ ---- bivp., ---- •_ .. •.-,- -- - 1. . , 0 gig i i a . 11 1 lit 0 -.•• . , • i t . t . . . ',.. . . . - '....• . . . . _ . -. ... - , 0 .".4 . -- • -; 'ti,-7 6..-.-.... ..-.. -.. : 6- .• 1 -:. - ;-..1, L - . .-• , - - i. •' . ... .....* ... - --*r.::_lt - ..` I •••-• - • - a 0 GEORGE F. X. ROMBACH, PhD, JD, CPA e-mail: Telephone:. Facsimile: Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION In Re: ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY PLANNING APPLICATION Nos. PA0S-0241 and PA08-0242 (APN 957-140-012) APPEAL SECTION D DESCRIPTION OF DESIRED ACTION TO BE TAKEN Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 COMES NOW GEORGE FREDERICK XAVIER ROMBACH, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens, to set forth a Description of the DESIRED ACTION TO BE TAKEN pursuant to the APPEAL of the approval on December 1, 2010 of the City of Temecula Planning Commission of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY, which action is set forth in the primary action desired and if the primary action not be granted then in the altemative(s) thereto as follows: -1- APPEAL—Section 1- APPEAL.—Section D Description of Desired Action to be Taken 1 1, REVERSE — The Approval of the "Mitigated Negative Declaration" as NOT 2 being a proper finding of fact regarding environmental impact of the project under California 3 Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq. (CEQA). 4 5 2. REVERSE -- The Approval of the Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and 6 PA08-0242. 7 8 And in the ALTERNATIVE should the City Council decline to outright reverse the 9 Planning Commission approval of such applications to do the following: 10 1 I 3. MODIFY — The formula and method by which the amount of parking that is truly 12 adequate to the actual needs of a mosque and consistent with its theological requirements such that 13 it will not adversely impacting the surrounding environment. 14 15 4. MODIFY — The Approval of the Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and 16 PA08-0242 such that proper environmental impact and traffic studies are conducted, and the 17 "Conditions of Approval" therefore provide for the following: 18 A. PARKING — Pursuant to a modified method of determination as set forth 19 in action 3, above; 20 B. RELOCATION -- Of the building to higher ground out of the flood plain 21 in a way that it will not visually dominate and eclipse the Calvary Baptist Church from 22 Nicolas Road; 23 C. TRAFFIC — That Nicolas Road be widened to four through traffic lanes 24 (two each way), with a center left turn lane, bike lanes each direction, and provisions for 25 no parking just as it currently exits on Nicolas Road from Winchester Road to Joseph 26 Road/Via Lobo. That at a minimum such widening be done along the subject property and 27 from southwest corner of the subject property to the intersection of Calle Medusa and 28 ( Nicolas Road; -2- APPEAL -- Section D Description of Desired Action to be Taken 1 D. TRAFFIC — That a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Calle 2 Medusa to control traffic at that intersection AND Calle Colibri and the parking lot of the 3 Grace Presbyterian Church in order to provide for the addition traffic load the project will 4 cause, as well as proper emergency evacuation of the subject property and the general 5 safety of the public at large in the vicinity of the subject property; and 6 E. OPERATIONS — That operations under the Conditional Use Permit 7 exclude any operations on Sunday mornings so as to relieve some of congestion resulting 8 from the project and to mitigate potential conflict with the Applicant and its neighbor. 9 10 While these modification do not impose a substantial burden on the Applicant, if the City 11 Council declines to make such modifications to the Planning Commission approval of the 12 applications to in the FURTHER. ALTERNATIVE to do the following: 13 14 5. APPROVE ONLY — The Application for the first phase of the project (Planning 15 Application Nos. PA08-0241) and monitor the impact of that stage of the project and 16 17 6. HOLD — The approval of the Application for the second phase of the project 18 (Planning Application Nos. PA08-0242) pending the results of the monitoring the impact of the 19 first stage of the project. 20 21 22 II Dated: December 15, 2010 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED George F. X. Rombach -3- APPEAL — Section D Description of Desired Action to be Taken 1 2 3 q e-mail: '1 N 4 Telephone: Facsimile: GEORGE F. X. ROMBACH, PhD, JD, CPA 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS 8 ant OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION In Re: ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY PLANNING APPLICATION Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 (APN 957-140-012) APPEAL SECTION E PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENT `RADIUS PACKAGE' Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 COMES NOW GEORGE FREDERICK X,AVIER ROMBACII, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens, to memorialize an understanding and agreement with staff (Eric Jones) as to the PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENT -- 'RADIUS PACKAGE' of the APPEAL of the approval on December 1, 2010 of the City of Temecula Planning Commission of Plan Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY. In that the City of Temecula is already in possession a current set of -1- APPEAL — Section E Public Hearing Requirements — 'Radius Package' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 mailing labels, which has been duly certified, the City was waived the requirement for Appellant to duplicate such requirement as a part of this Appeal. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Dated: December 15, 2010 M/fiaae4 George F. X. Rombach -2- APPEAL — Section E Public Fearing Requirements—'Radius Package, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ;OROS F. X. ROMBACH, PhD, JD, CPA e-mail: 4111.11111111111111101011111111, Telechane: Facsimile: Principal of CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION In Re: ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY PLANNING APPLICATION Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 (APN 957-140-012) APPEAL SECTION C EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE POSITION OF APPAEL Public Hearing: December 1, 2010 COMES NOW GEORGE FREDERICK XAVIER ROMBACH, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and a principal of the unincorporated association known as Concerned American Citizens, to submit evidence of FLOODING at the property which is the subject of the City of Temecula Planning Commission of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 filed by the ISLAMIC CENTER OF TEMECULA VALLEY as a part of his APPEAL of the approval said application on December 1, 2010. During the rains of the last week December 2010, which were very much short of the -1- PHOIDORAPH OF FLOODING — Section C Evidence to Support Position of Appeal 1 hundred (100) year flood conditions, the subject property actually flooded in a significant.portion 2 of the flood plain area (see photograph attached). This situation proves beyond even the 3 possibility of a shadow of a doubt there is a very real environmental issue as to the subject 4 property being in the flood plain area. A photograph of that flooding condition follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Dated: January 7, 2010 t.dWI . X0421,4a4 George F. X. Ronxbach -2- PHOTOGRAPH OF FLOODING — Section C Evidence to Support Position of Appeal PC RESOLUTION NO. 10-26 PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA08-0241 AND PA08- 0242, A TWO-PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TWO-STORY, 24,943 SQUARE FOOT RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 4.32 ACRES WITHIN A VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE COLIBRI (APN 957-140-012) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 14, 2008, Stephen Sigler, Axis 3 Architecture, on behalf of owner, Islamic Center of Temecula Valley filed Planning Application No. PA08-0241, a Development Plan, and Planning Application No. PA08-0242, a Conditional Use Permit Application. Both applications were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on December 1, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Section 17.05.010.F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed use as a compatible use within residential areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and State law. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; As conditioned, the project has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the Initial Study process to further ensure that the project has been designed and appropriately conditioned so that it will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E) C. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; The proposed religious facility is located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. Religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in VL zones. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed use is for a religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential district. According to the City of Temecula Development Code, these types of uses are allowed in all residential districts upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Custom single-family homes surround the project on all sides with the exception of the east side. An existing religious facility lies to the east of the proposed project. As designed and conditioned, the project will not adversely affect adjacent uses, buildings or structures. E. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; As designed and conditioned the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features required in the City of Temecula Development Code have been satisfied. As a result, the project will integrate into the surrounding area in much the same way as the immediately adjacent existing religious facility. F. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The project is a religious facility to be located in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district. Religious facilities are a permitted use in VL zones with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which contains provisions to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. G. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for the Conditional Use Permit will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone, located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the proposed Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit as described in the Initial Study for the project. Based upon the findings contained in that study, it was determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on May 28, 2010, and expired on June 26, 2010. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. C. Two written comments on the initial study were received prior to the public hearing and responses to the comments were prepared. The responses have been submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the December 1, 2010 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the mitigation measures required by the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241 and PA08-0242, a two-phase Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a two-story, 24,943 square foot religious facility on 4.32 acres within a VL zone located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 1st day of December 2010. arl Carey, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary STATE O{F.( ' IFORNIA ) COUNTd RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 10-26 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of December 2010, by the following vote: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, Telesio NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE DECEMBER 1, 2010 — 6:00 PM PRELUDE MUSIC: Earlene Bundy CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Harter Roll Call: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Next in Order: Resolution: 10-25 Approve the Minutes of November 17, 2010 APPROVED 4-0-0-1, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT; VOICE REFLECTED APPROVAL; HARTER ABSTAINED 2 Change in Location for the Planning Commission Meetings APPROVED 5-0, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT; VOICE VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 10-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE LOCATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS TO CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 41000 MAIN STREET, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. 1 Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-story, 24,943 Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, Eric Jones APPROVED 5-0, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT; VOICE VOTE REFLECTED UNANIMOUS APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 10-26 PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA08-0241 AND PA08-0242, A TWO-PHASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A TWO- STORY, 24,943 SQUARE FOOT RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 4.32 ACRES WITHIN A VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE COLIBRI (APN 957-140-012) Suzanne Rombach, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Margaret Jones, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Sylvester Scott, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Wiley Drake, Buena Park resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Mano Bakh, Wildomar resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Gayle Byrne, Menifee resident, addressed the Planning Commission. George Rombach, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. William Rench, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Amy Pina, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Julie Gilbart, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Jacqueline Le Beau, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Twilla Leonard, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Dr. Walter Moseneder, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Laura Scott, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Gabe, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Michael Torretti addressed the Planning Commission. Lorina Bennett, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Larry Slusser, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Patrice Lynes, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Donna Maxey, Corona resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Rev. Dominic Rivkin addressed the Planning Commission Paul Jacobs, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Diane Serafin, addressed the Planning Commission. Bob Kowell, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Rabbi Haim Beliak, Los Angeles resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Yosef Klien, West Hills resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Matthew, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. 2 Amy, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission Eric Greene, Los Angeles resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Michelle Lauridsen, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Tyler Saldanna, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Nam -Yong Horn, Menifee resident, addressed the Planning Commission. James E. Horn, Menifee resident, addressed the Planning Commission. David Pine, Los Angeles resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Adrienne Murphy,Tustin Ranch resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Brigitte Green, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Joseph Zarro, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Hadi Nael, Wildomar resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Christine Welsh. Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Suzanne Marks, Los Angeles resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Maya Barron, Los Angeles resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Dr. Ali A. Selim, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. David Dresnick, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. John Trautman addressed the Planning Commission. Fred Butler, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Rebecca F. Al-Ghizawi, Menifee resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Mahmoud Harmoosh, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Dr. Nisar Ahmed, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Don Krampe, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Farah, Winchester resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Shakeel Syed, Anaheim resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Karen Lugo addressed the Planning Commission. Tahmina Morshed, Menifee resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Arafiena Akbar, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Salam Al-Marayati, Sunland resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Barbara Breyer, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Farouk Abdullah, Romoland resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Greg Krzys, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Moamer Shurrab, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Wendy Rench, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Ernie White, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Samir Bazlamit, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Mahmood Choudere, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Mohamed Wehha addressed the Planning Commission. Ken Engleman, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Ali Zamani, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. John B. Rogers, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. lyad Hajjaj, Hollywood resident, addressed the Planning Commission. AJ Shaker, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Mahmoud Zubaidi, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Jessie Arellano, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Marc A. Beherac, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Teresa Formentera, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Kathi Head, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Dr. Joseph Abrahamm, Santa Ana resident, addressed the Planning Commission Adam Eventon, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Suhail Fares, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Naureen Shaker, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Waleed Abdullah, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Oumar Sisko, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Michael Johnson, Murrieta resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Raymond Johnson, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Ted Wegener, Menifee resident, addressed the Planning Commission. Robert Rosenstren, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. &Carl Carey Chairman 4 Patrick Richardson Director of Planning and Redevelopment Ladies and Gentleman - Good evening to you! My name is Dr. Walter Moseneder. I am a retired Physicist and a first generation immigrant from Germany. Studying religions has been my life long interest. Traveling to 26 countries in my lifetime has given me the opportunity to meet many people of the most diversified cultures and religions. Yes, religious people all over the world may be dogmatic in their faith but display a deep felt friendliness and peace -loving attitude to everyone who accepts them the way they are. And the Muslims here in the USA or abroad are no exceptions. I am bewildered and deeply saddened that the public so easily judges the whole Islamic Religion by the conduct of a few misguided extremists without having a deeper knowledge of the Koran. For me, as an immigrant, the written words of the Bill of Rights were very impressive. The First Amendment says so beautiful and concise: "Congress shall make no law concerning (respecting) an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The Framers of the Bill of Rights have in their wisdom put religious freedom beyond the reach of popular opinion and oppression. By doing so they guaranteed the freedom to practice all recognized faiths not just that which is most popular locally. Contrary to certain groups fighting what they call the "Islamization of America" no religious law can trump the Constitution. All Americans are free to practice their faith according to the laws of their faith - as Catholics under the Canon Law, Jews under the Jewish Law and Muslims under many variations of the Islamic Law, Sharia. But if and when these laws conflict with American Law, American Law prevails. It is NOT an American tradition to accept tenets of our laws only when they are convenient. Knowing the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley and being a good friend of their Imam, Mahmoud Hamoush, gives me more insight and competence to voice my support for the development of the Mosque. I live in the neighborhood where the Mosque is planned. I do not have any concern that the increased traffic caused by the Islamic congregation coming to the planned center would cause a problem especially since their days of worship do not coincide with the neighboring church. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to voice my support for the construction of the Mosque at Nickolas Road. fl!) pja 5, Calilo OIyrrwi)Pa BY , s Angeles. CA ( ow)" Bay Area T 51o.527:' o F: ,iO...27.8613o lberty Street CA 9453o www.pjalliance.org Progressive Jewish Alliance Mr. Patrick Richardson City of Temecula Director of Planning & Development 43200 Business Park Dr. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Mr. Richardson, We are writing as leaders in the Jewish community—and as conscientious Americans— to urge you to ensure that the Muslim community in Temecula receives fair and just consideration of its request to build a Mosque. In 1790 George Washington sent a letter to the Jewish community of Rhode Island in which he declared that freedom of religious worship was a "natural right" and added that in our country "the rights of all are protected. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunity of citizenship." This was a welcome embrace for a people that had suffered persecution in most every country in Europe. As Jews we heed the Biblical call not to oppress the stranger "for [we] were strangers in the land of Egypt." When we see today's nationwide rise in anti -Muslim discrimination and opposition to Muslim houses of worship in various states, we remember when we were strangers and newcomers to this great country. Covenants prevented Jews from buying houses and zoning laws prevented Jewish communities from building houses of worship. We remember the politicians and pundits who declared that Jews could never become part of the American family. We also remember the hostility directed at Catholics, Quakers, Mormons and others who were once feared as untrustworthy, rejected as unworthy. We remember that those prejudices were wrong then. We know they are wrong now. As Americans we are proud that the bedrock principles of equal protection under the law and freedom of worship have allowed for the flourishing and cooperation of a wide array of religious communities which have enriched our nation. And we are concerned that the suspicion and hostility directed at Muslim communities on the basis of their religious identity are undermining those principles. We hope that Temecula can bring to fruition our common dream, expressed so eloquently by George Washington, that our country be a place which "gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance." Sincerely, Elissa Barrett — Executive Director — Progressive Jewish Alliance Eric Greene — Southern California Regional Director - Progressive Jewish Alliance Rabbi Aaron L. Alexander Rabbi Lewis M. Barth Rabbi Haim Beliak Rabbi Karen Bender Rabbi Dr. Michael Berenbaum Rabbi Sharon Brous Rabbi Steven Carr Reuben, Ph.D. Rabbi Aryeh Cohen, Ph.D. Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Ph.D Rabbi Lisa Edwards Rabbi Reuven Firestone, Phd Rabbi Dara Frimmer Rabbi Laura Geller Rabbi Pinchas Giller, PhD. Rabbi Mel Gottlieb, Ph.D, Rabbi Lizzi Heydemann Rabbi Steven Jacobs Rabbi Rick Kellner Rabbi Paul Kipnes Rabbi Jonathan Klein Rabbi Zoe Klein Rabbi Susan Laemmle, Ph.D. Rabbi Josh Levine Grater Rabbi Stan Levy Rabbi Gary Ezra Oren Rabbi Scott Perlo Rabbi Joel Simonds Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz Cantor Evan Kent Professor Jody Myers Stephen Rohde, President - Progressive Jewish Alliance Douglas E. Mirell, Esq. Immediate Past President - Progressive Jewish Alliance fT.T) pja 5.. California T 3237603;33o r 23.761.8355 W Olympic Blvd, dos Angeles, CA 9oo.16 gay Area T' Sa�1.�y f,gx4o 5w..52.7.8680 680 ryn.9 liberty Street. El Cerrito. CA 9453.1 www.pjalllance.org Progressive Jewish Alliance Mr. Patrick Richardson City of Temecula Director of Planning & Development 43200 Business Park Dr. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Mr. Richardson, We are writing as leaders in the Jewish community—and as conscientious Americans— to urge you to ensure that the Muslim community in Temecula receives fair and just consideration of its request to build a Mosque. In 1790 George Washington sent a letter to the Jewish community of Rhode Island in which he declared that freedom of religious worship was a "natural right" and added that in our country "the rights of all are protected. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunity of citizenship." This was a welcome embrace for a people that had suffered persecution in most every country in Europe. As Jews we heed the Biblical call not to oppress the stranger "for [we] were strangers in the land of Egypt." When we see today's nationwide rise in anti -Muslim discrimination and opposition to Muslim houses of worship in various states, we remember when we were strangers and newcomers to this great country. Covenants prevented Jews from buying houses and zoning laws prevented Jewish communities from building houses of worship. We remember the politicians and pundits who declared that Jews could never become part of the American family. We also remember the hostility directed at Catholics, Quakers, Mormons and others who were once feared as untrustworthy, rejected as unworthy. We remember that those prejudices were wrong then. We know they are wrong now. As Americans we are proud that the bedrock principles of equal protection under the law and freedom of worship have allowed for the flourishing and cooperation of a wide array of religious communities which have enriched our nation. And we are concerned that the suspicion and hostility directed at Muslim communities on the basis of their religious identity are undermining those principles. We hope that Temecula can bring to fruition our common dream, expressed so eloquently by George Washington, that our country be a place which "gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance." Sincerely, Elissa Barrett — Executive Director — Progressive Jewish Alliance Eric Greene — Southern California Regional Director - Progressive Jewish Alliance Rabbi Aaron L. Alexander Rabbi Lewis M. Barth Rabbi Haim Beliak Rabbi Karen Bender Rabbi Dr. Michael Berenbaum Rabbi Sharon Brous Rabbi Steven Carr Reuben, Ph.D. Rabbi Aryeh Cohen, Ph.D. Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Ph.D Rabbi Lisa Edwards Rabbi Reuven Firestone, Phd Rabbi Dara Frimmer Rabbi Laura Geller Rabbi Pinchas Giller, PhD. Rabbi Mel Gottlieb, Ph.D, Rabbi Lizzi Heydemann Rabbi Steven Jacobs Rabbi Rick Kellner Rabbi Paul Kipnes Rabbi Jonathan Klein Rabbi Zoe Klein Rabbi Susan Laemmle, Ph.D. Rabbi Josh Levine Grater Rabbi Stan Levy Rabbi Gary Ezra Oren Rabbi Scott Perlo Rabbi Joel Simonds Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz Cantor Evan Kent Professor Jody Myers Stephen Rohde, President - Progressive Jewish Alliance Douglas E. Mirell, Esq. Immediate Past President - Progressive Jewish Alliance pjaProgressive Jewish Alliance S. California G 323.761 8350 r 323.76L.835.5 • a w. Olympic F3iivri, Angeles, CA 90036. Bay Area 5as.5 27.f3r p 10.527,868 I09 trberw Sireel Et Cerrito, CA 94530 www.pjalliance.org Mr. Patrick Richardson City of Temecula Director of Planning & Development 43200 Business Park Dr. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Mr. Richardson, We are writing as leaders in the Jewish community—and as conscientious Americans— to urge you to ensure that the Muslim community in Temecula receives fair and just consideration of its request to build a Mosque. In 1790 George Washington sent a letter to the Jewish community of Rhode Island in which he declared that freedom of religious worship was a "natural right" and added that in our country "the rights of all are protected. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunity of citizenship." This was a welcome embrace for a people that had suffered persecution in most every country in Europe. As Jews we heed the Biblical call not to oppress the stranger "for [we] were strangers in the land of Egypt." When we see today's nationwide rise in anti -Muslim discrimination and opposition to Muslim houses of worship in various states, we remember when we were strangers and newcomers to this great country. Covenants prevented Jews from buying houses and zoning laws prevented Jewish communities from building houses of worship. We remember the politicians and pundits who declared that Jews could never become part of the American family. We also remember the hostility directed at Catholics, Quakers, Mormons and others who were once feared as untrustworthy, rejected as unworthy. We remember that those prejudices were wrong then. We know they are wrong now. As Americans we are proud that the bedrock principles of equal protection under the law and freedom of worship have allowed for the flourishing and cooperation of a wide array of religious communities which have enriched our nation. And we are concerned that the suspicion and hostility directed at Muslim communities on the basis of their religious identity are undermining those principles. We hope that Temecula can bring to fruition our common dream, expressed so eloquently by George Washington, that our country be a place which "gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance." Sincerely, Elissa Barrett — Executive Director — Progressive Jewish Alliance Eric Greene — Southern California Regional Director - Progressive Jewish Alliance Rabbi Aaron L. Alexander Rabbi Lewis M. Barth Rabbi Haim Beliak Rabbi Karen Bender Rabbi Dr. Michael Berenbaum Rabbi Sharon Brous Rabbi Steven Carr Reuben, Ph.D. Rabbi Aryeh Cohen, Ph.D. Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Ph.D Rabbi Lisa Edwards Rabbi Reuven Firestone, Phd Rabbi Dara Frimmer Rabbi Laura Geller Rabbi Pinchas Giller, PhD. Rabbi Mel Gottlieb, Ph.D, Rabbi Lizzi Heydemann Rabbi Steven Jacobs Rabbi Rick Kellner Rabbi Paul Kipnes Rabbi Jonathan Klein Rabbi Zoe Klein Rabbi Susan Laemmle, Ph.D. Rabbi Josh Levine Grater Rabbi Stan Levy Rabbi Gary Ezra Oren Rabbi Scott Perlo Rabbi Joel Simonds Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz Cantor Evan Kent Professor Jody Myers Stephen Rohde, President - Progressive Jewish Alliance Douglas E. Mirell, Esq. Immediate Past President - Progressive Jewish Alliance )pja 5. California T 323,761.835,o 3 3..761.8 355 s '7ta W. Olympic Bqv<I„ i r 5 Angeles, CA 90o6 Bay Area T 510.527,8640 409 1 heriy 5ireci El Cerrito, CA 9453o www.pjalliance.org Progressive Jewish Alliance Mr. Patrick Richardson City of Temecula Director of Planning & Development 43200 Business Park Dr. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Mr. Richardson, We are writing as leaders in the Jewish community—and as conscientious Americans— to urge you to ensure that the Muslim community in Temecula receives fair and just consideration of its request to build a Mosque. In 1790 George Washington sent a letter to the Jewish community of Rhode Island in which he declared that freedom of religious worship was a "natural right" and added that in our country "the rights of all are protected. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunity of citizenship." This was a welcome embrace for a people that had suffered persecution in most every country in Europe. As Jews we heed the Biblical call not to oppress the stranger "for [we] were strangers in the land of Egypt." When we see today's nationwide rise in anti -Muslim discrimination and opposition to Muslim houses of worship in various states, we remember when we were strangers and newcomers to this great country. Covenants prevented Jews from buying houses and zoning laws prevented Jewish communities from building houses of worship. We remember the politicians and pundits who declared that Jews could never become part of the American family. We also remember the hostility directed at Catholics, Quakers, Mormons and others who were once feared as untrustworthy, rejected as unworthy. We remember that those prejudices were wrong then. We know they are wrong now. As Americans we are proud that the bedrock principles of equal protection under the law and freedom of worship have allowed for the flourishing and cooperation of a wide array of religious communities which have enriched our nation. And we are concerned that the suspicion and hostility directed at Muslim communities on the basis of their religious identity are undermining those principles. We hope that Temecula can bring to fruition our common dream, expressed so eloquently by George Washington, that our country be a place which "gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance." Sincerely, Elissa Barrett — Executive Director — Progressive Jewish Alliance Eric Greene — Southern California Regional Director - Progressive Jewish Alliance Rabbi Aaron L. Alexander Rabbi Lewis M. Barth Rabbi Haim Beliak Rabbi Karen Bender Rabbi Dr. Michael Berenbaum Rabbi Sharon Brous Rabbi Steven Carr Reuben, Ph.D. Rabbi Aryeh Cohen, Ph.D. Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels Rabbi Elliot Dorff, Ph.D Rabbi Lisa Edwards Rabbi Reuven Firestone, Phd Rabbi Dara Frimmer Rabbi Laura Geller Rabbi Pinchas Giller, PhD. Rabbi Mel Gottlieb, Ph.D, Rabbi Lizzi Heydemann Rabbi Steven Jacobs Rabbi Rick Kellner Rabbi Paul Kipnes Rabbi Jonathan Klein Rabbi Zoe Klein Rabbi Susan Laemmle, Ph.D. Rabbi Josh Levine Grater Rabbi Stan Levy Rabbi Gary Ezra Oren Rabbi Scott Perlo Rabbi Joel Simonds Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz Cantor Evan Kent Professor Jody Myers Stephen Rohde, President - Progressive Jewish Alliance Douglas E. Mirell, Esq. Immediate Past President - Progressive Jewish Alliance 30 November 2010 Mr. Patrick Richardson City of Temecula Director of Planning & Development 43200 Business Park Dr. P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Mr. Richardson: As faith leaders we are proud that the commitment to pluralism and to the free exercise of religion have helped make the United States one of the most religiously diverse and vibrant countries in the world. However, those values of religious freedom and diversity are threatened by the marked nationwide increase in acts of violence, discrimination and hostility directed at Muslim Americans and their religious identity. That hostility is manifest in unfounded opposition to the lawful building and expansion of Mosques in number of states. We know that American values of equality and inclusion have often had to compete with fear and discrimination. Historically, adherents of various religions — including Christians (Catholics and Mormons) and Jews — have faced hostility and opposition to the erection of houses of worship. Religious groups that are, today, valued part of mainstream America were once feared as intruders. Optimistically, we see today's controversies through the historical lenses of the acculturation experience. Our belief in compassion and our desire for a free and equal United States sustains us. We therefore urge you to ensure that the application of the Temecula Muslim community to build a new Mosque be given consideration through the exercise of fair play, moral probity, and legal merits. We hope that momentary prejudices and passions of some citizens not be allowed to taint or influence the permitting or planning process. If we can be of any assistance, or if you would like to discuss this further, please contact Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater at rabbijoshua@pjtc.net. Sincerely, Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater, Chair, Abrahamic Faiths Peacemaking Initiative Rev. Dr. Matthew Colwell Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels Rabbi Leonard Beerman 2 Father Chris Ponnet Dr. Steve Wiebe Rabbi Sharon Brous Shawn Landres Rev. J. Edwin Bacon Professor David N. Meyers Hussam Ayloush Rev. Dr. Scott Colglazier Rev. Dr. Art Cribbs Rev. Frank Alton Rabbi Jonathan Klein Rev. Ryan Bell Imam Jihad Turk Rabbi Steve Jacobs Rev. Susan Craig Rev. Bear Ride Rev. Louis Chase Professor Rebecca Golbert Rev. Peter Laarman Rabbi Haim Dov Beliak Eric Greene cc Mr. Hadi Nael December 3, 2010 In the Name of Allah, The Beneficent, The Merciful Carl R. Carey, Chairman City of Temecula Planning Commission 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92589 Re: Islamic Center of Temecula Valley Dear Mr. Carey: I applaud you for upholding the United States constitution, City of Temecula laws and also the God given common sense in granting the approval for the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley to build a new Mosque. On behalf of the Islamic Shura Council, an umbrella organization of Mosques that includes the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley, I thank you and the Commissioners sincerely for your public service. Sincerely,. Shakeel Syed Executive Director 2115 W. Crescent Avenue, Suite 261, Anaheim, CA 92801 • Tel: (714) 239-6473 • Fax: (714) 239-6493 Email: info@shuracouncil.org • Website: www.shuracouncil.org Hemet — San Jacinto Interfaith Council P. O. Box 37 San Jacinto, CA 9 Dear Neighbor: Sent to Mayor cc: P. Richardson On behalf of the Interfaith community of the mid -county region we are writing to express our solidarity with and concern for the Islamic Community of the Temecula area. The members of the Hemet — San Jacinto Interfaith Council voted at our November 2010 meeting to express our support and encouragement to the members of the Temecula Valley Muslim Community as they are planning to build a new Mosque and Community Center. We are respectfully asking and praying that the Temecula City Council and community will give you all the support you will need. We hope to increase interfaith cooperation and appreciation however possible, throughout our local region. We will make an effort to keep you informed of some of the events we sponsor throughout the year to this end. Peace, chael J. "gal, Presid Captain Susan Gibson, Secretary Hemet — San Jacinto Interfaith Council RECEIVED X11 2.0a) CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE USA FIRST-CLASS FOREVER „11 11.11.11,ALd1„ Apologists or Extremists Salam al-Marayati Adi founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council and its current executive director, Salam al-Marayati's family moved to the United States from Iraq when he was a young boy.f 1] He gained national attention in 1999, when then -House Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt nominated him to serve on the National Commission on Terrorism. Gephardt later withdrew the nomination after a public backlash highlighted al-Marayati's defense of terrorist acts and the groups who carry them out. 2 Al-Marayati's record on defending terrorist groups and extremists is substantial. During a 2002 speech at the State Department, Salam al-Marayati, said, "Rashid Ghannouchi is an example of those who promote this need for dialogue between civilizations, not confrontation." 3 Ghannoushi was the head of Tunisia's banned Muslim Brotherhood -aligned Al-Nanda Party and was convicted by a Tunisian court of responsibility for a bomb blast that blew the foot off a British tourist. In a 1999 PBS interview, he called Hizballah attacks "legitimate resistance,"5 but later added "when a Muslim commits an act of terrorism, we stand very loudly and clearly against that Muslim that committed that act of violence."161 Yet in 1996, he issued no condemnation for a man who crashed his car into a crowded Jerusalem bus stop, shouting Allahu Akbar. One person was killed and 23 others injured in the incident. The attacker was shot dead at the scene, something al-Marayati condemned as a "provocative act" and he called for the shooter's extradition to the United States to stand trial.ED Al-Marayati has continued to attempt to minimize terrorist attacks by Muslims, decry U.S. government anti -terrorism measures, and blame anything he can on the state of Israel. For instance, on September 11, 2001, on a Los Angeles radio program al-Marayati said, ""If we're going to look at suspects, we should look to the groups that benefit the most from these kinds of incidents, and I think we should put the state of Israel on the suspect list because I think this diverts attention from what's happening in the Palestinian territories so that they can go on with their aggression and occupation and apartheid policies." Two years later, in a March 2003 Los Angeles Times article, Salam al-Marayati blasted the FBI, stating that they had been targeting people on the basis of race and religion.91 Ignoring several prominent terrorism cases across the country, he added, "That's what they've been doing since the attacks, and we don't know of any case that has resulted in the arrest, indictment or prosecution of a terrorist."[l Oj Commenting on the government's actions against alleged terrorist financiers, specifically of Rafil Dhafir of Help the Needy (indicted in February 2003, convicted and sentenced to 22 years in prison in 2005) and his cohorts, in October 2004, Salam al-Marayati said, "It is a sham. You just hope at the end of a long battle these people can be vindicated because they did nothing wrong."[111 In response to the government's recent refusal to grant MPAC's request to release Holy Land Foundation, Benevolence International undalion, and Global Relief Foundation funds to a third -party, [ 12] al-Marayati asserted, in 2004, that "the government..: betrayed us." [ 13 ] At a fundraising dinner for Palestinian Islamic Jihad member Sarni Al -Arian in Anaheim, California in 2006, al-Marayati said to the attendees, "So if we have this case where we are being dictated upon, not only on terminology, but dictated upon on who speaks for us, and our organizations, our charities, are shut down one by one. Therefore, brothers and sisters, there is a storm that is coming. That storm is going to be worse than Japanese internment."[141 Beyond the effect these words may have in causing hysteria, distrust, and fear in the Muslim - American community, al-Marayati has advised Muslims to shun FBI efforts to recruit informants. Speaking to an audience in Dallas in 2005, he stated, "We reject any efforts, notion, suggestion that Muslim should start spying on one another. In fact if you look at the Lodi case, the disaster of Lodi is that Muslims were reporting each other to the authorities saying, 'Oh, this person is an extremist' and the other camp saying the same things so both of them got in trouble. So, we are, this is the model not to follow."[15] MPAC, meanwhile, has issued policy papers which argue for the removal of Hizballah and Hamas from U.S. terrorist designations. The "! 999 counterterrorism "poli ; lea c '° asks "...is Lebanon's Hezbollah, which calls for the creation of an Islamic republic, a terrorist organization? Again, most of its members are not actively involved in terror." It then tries to minimize Hizballah's brutal attack on the U.S. Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983 -- an attack which killed 241 U.S. military personnel: "...this attack, for all the pain it caused, was not in a strict sense, a terrorist operation. It was a military operation, producing no civilian casualties -- exactly the kind of attack that Americans might have lauded had it been directed against Washington's enemies." (emphasis added) [ 16] The 2003 co terterrorism paper advocated removing Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hizballah from the federal government's list of designated terrorist groups. It reads: Meanwhile, Arab states question Washington's list of designated pro -Palestinian groups and humanitarian organizations. It is clear that the current terrorist threat to the US emanates from Al-Qaeda and not Palestinian groups. There is no evidence that Palestinian groups designated as terrorist organizations have any connections to Al-Qaeda. Yet the preoccupation with these groups raises the question as to whether targeting Palestinian groups serves true national security interests or is based on political considerations. [ 17] [11 "Salam al-Marayati," Muslim WaveLength Website (in association with IslamiCity and MPAC),1 gyfilyyaw l tr "city- warispilim alffnplgyat s !r (Accessed August 17, 2007). j21 "U.S. Muslim leader denies he's terrorist sympathizer," CNN, July 29, 1999, http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/07/29/terrorism.commission/ (Accessed August 17, 2007). [3] "MPAC's Speech on Moderation at the State Department," January 28, 2002, l� t p://www. o p k . i j ? 11: M 17 (accessed August 23, 2004). 14.1 Michael Binyon, "Britain Shuts Door on Fundamentalists," The Times, January 5, 1996. Note: According to The Sunday Telegraph, Ghannouchi was "rounded up with several thousand other opponents of the Tunisian government following an alleged plot to assassinate the country's president, Ben Ali, in 1991." See: Con Coughlin, "Senators fight to keep sheikh out of the US State Department told of Islamic fundamentalist's alleged links with terrorism," Sunday Telegraph, May 22, 1994 5j Salam al-Marayati, "Muslims in America." NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, PBS, November 24. 1999 Salam al-Marayati, "Muslims in America." NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, PBS, November 24, 1999 7 The Minaret, March 1996. DI Larry Stammer, "After the Attack: Jewish -Muslim Dialogue Newly Tested," The Los Angeles Times, September 22, 2001. H.G. Reza ,"FBI Has a Pledge and a Request for Muslims," The Los Angeles Times, March 16, 2003. [101 H.G. Reza ,"FBI Has a Pledge and a Request for Muslims," The Los Angeles Times, March 16, 2003. 1111 Renee Gadoua, "Muslim Vote's Impact Weighed," The Post -Standard, October 12, 2004. [ 12] Gregory Vistica, "Frozen Assets Going to Legal Bills," The Washington Post, November 1, 2003 and "Steve Emerson's Self -Serving Distortions," MPAC Press Release, January 28, 2004, tap://www.mpac.orgjiews. a tic1 d s sp ."?1 I :'M 619 (accessed July 21, 2004). [13J Audio recording, "The Shape of the American Muslim Community in the Next Decade," MPAC, Houston, Texas, June 18, 2004. Salam al-Marayati, Audio Recording, Sami al -Arian Banquet Dinner, Anaheim, CA, March 12, 2006. [ 151 ISNA Dallas Conference. July 1-3, 2005. [161 "A Position Paper on U.S. Counterterrorism Policy," Muslim Public Affairs Council. June 1999. [ 17] "A Review of U.S. Counterterrorism Policy: American Muslim Critique & Recommendations," Muslim Public Affairs Council, September 2003. 1tRp://www,mpac.orglpukal c. tic71lSlccruntjr;lea-r01ism-pQ) cy7vp_cl/c^oukutorr 1 paper.pdf Y: Building of a Mosque in our Town of Temecula Pu,UIR" °•SE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY °r' from Temecula General Plan and Development Code (TGPDC) The following issue is addressed in the Element: • Criminal activities (I bailey many asp llli eta „, tllrSIIIInuariiiiah tr American lifter ore The Center for Security Policy: shariah has been, for over a half -century, lavishly financed and propagated by Islamic regimes (particularly Saudi Arabia, Iran & the Muslim Brotherhood ) IIIhtIlllllll;llll E111 1111tllllllIIIR IT" IS SHAMA II m"IIII°ui hillr GORED II IINS III f Ill„uat” SQUIIIIIiiiS If 1II Ili,,,,JCSAFIIEETY PLAN: from Temecula General Plan and Development Code(TGPDC) Providing an environment where businesses and residents can prosper and feel safe (1 III AShave Arnerica os 111 II'Illlf°ii' III' 11111'1. BEE S Im°I'mm Irur the YInanrimA^.11110 1„„yw 1„„yIs pr- ,`,.r 111'1111; IEE10u„r,,,UlttUfll°R IIID' IS SIII It'tlt.I I '".r m ,� r,,,, f .ticr� ti( I°°IIIb°°Illi. f t� .r VEIN � a� IIII ,IIII Biu tta� tllliii; ['ERRMEM REAM°rrESS ,,ND °i ESP NSE from Temecula General Plan and Development Code(TGPDC) In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the City of Temecula's emergency preparedness and response services have become an even more critical function to address terrorism issues that confront the nation and local communities. (I behave ieve 1h^ S h•�Ir t:errurns mann t dui. finest a n d liiis I m pIIUentientroy d to d or OUR '. :�::u�mrliiic „n y f life„„ rave niu to see . thcouurntmriiiie s h IIU°ur v squrr's in and hot tllhdr wr y t hcS mrro't just be rrnuirr clllh a ed Ilb:urt li„me IIF0REVIlER and h „Oh are o ,"ruuuut:ur ^I°"'sive t the SIIlhamrlaf: IIIL.......„«. ) The Center for Security Policy: The Terrorist Threat is Shariah. It obliges them to engage in jihad to achieve the triumph of Islam worldwide through the establishment of a global Islamic state governed exclusively by shariah, under a restored caliphate. (Ca-li'-fa) f"t.11lllllllllll1111 fI mm,ru1BE;III"m;,„ IT 10IS SHAf1,.lI,F'I, IIII ,ATHAT GO VIIII'II°RIINS A110„„„„1„„„„,IVII . ��t tft°'III SAFETY AND SECVUDRI1Ir"Y from Temecula General Plan and Development Code (TGPDC) The perception of personal safety and the security of property are central to the quality of life in a community. Exposure to criminal activity can be reduced through regulation of human activity (IIII llllli'Ueve f humamrr ctiiiiviiirts this conbr stamridIn1 up to u:"an°ay not pont °zany srAues 90wby the Bah I„„„„auin uuur to oh, our te or cuurimtuiry„„ ��'°'IIII�IIIYIZE CIIID L.... ACTIVITY from Temecula General Plan and Development Code (TGPDC) Protect residents and businesses from criminal activity. mrliiiuu°irmiliiinI a BiiUviity tafs thSlllruuamrliiirrh Illta and r°. rmm s uuur I' .me^riir Ilbefin talllken away and turn IIIInto a b ;n.r°Ill n°,.riiu:r, inhumane ay of II iiu e t r mr In a en lbe I run IIrten • ruo d uu r fel gr mai IIII 111°:11111111d beion a 1IIII y lrmrr"'Ie'ste'just tstrdoh I' V u„„, I„„„„0S III11111I' 0 : Pt E, r bsr it is th Shariah I„„„„ that :Arno, 1101 III'VIInsq ipes not the Cher �u«uay Air uumr:d, So with the "IIIIP LITSLIC'S 11111111 4D: Ill llll„„„.IIIIIIIIIR;ASlIE 11)0 IIsIAl1111„„„„,lllt0 THIS wN1 r S u ;#�,t�I IIIIIiiiU' G OVfiiiIB EP IIE 0 BY 11111„„„„,ATO SUP 1IIID°111°°0 OUR I AlIIEftI r A IIII' I-1I0EIt I°III AI' III) III1'tIS"I”" rLr” f OSIIR, I ' IISIiiiiiEEID ANI) WAY OF”' V„„I1 IIE101„.„AII” D AND IIII' "'�r� 1����I II'°t AIII1�„u1� L.........IIII'° 1ft N SOIIII 11111„„„„,"If""Ilt'I R . I''FOU Tlllh'1 'iii; E „,;�u WO KED IV I11f"1DlR„ Thank you for your time: Barbara Breyer Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. I am here today to comment regarding two concerns. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. I am here today to comment regarding two concerns. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. I am here today to comment regarding two concerns. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. I am here today to comment regarding two concerns. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. I am here today to comment regarding two concerns. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. I am here today to comment regarding two concerns. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri, I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. I am here today to comment regarding two concerns. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. 2. Project Study Methodology This chapter documents the methodologies and assumptions used to conduct the circulation impact analysis for the proposed project. This section contains the following background information: • Study timeframes • Study area. description • Capacity analysis methodologies Study Timeframes This report presents an analysis of the intersection operating conditions during the peak periods, which were selected in consultation with City of Temecula staff for the following anticipated timeframe scenarios: • Existing Year 2010 • Opening Year 2013 Without and With Project • Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (including Roripaugh Ranch) • Cumulative Year 2013 Without and With Project (excluding Roripaugh Ranch) The Cay selected the following peak hours for analysis to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed project during overlapped peak hours between ICTV, Chaparral High School, Nicolas Valley Elementary School, Grace Presbyterian Church, and Calvary Baptist Church: • Weekday Friday (peak hours between 1:00 PM and 4:00 PM) • Weekend Sunday (peak hours between 9:00 AM and �4 *` Project Study Area The study area was determined through consultation with City of Temecula staff. As shown in Figure I, the study area consists of the following intersections: • Winchester Road at Margarita Road , • Winchester Road at Nicolas Road — J-1,--1-t-'r-S e'24 1 G L • Nkolas Road at North General Kearny Road — 2- • Nicolas Road at Calle - bri (Project 4 t • Walcott Lane at La Serena Way l J r"v^-cam Analysis Methodologies This section presents a brief overview of traffic analysis methodologies and concepts used in this study. Street system operating conditions are typically described in terms of "level of service." Level of service (LOS) is a report -card scale used to indicate the quality of traffic flow on roadway segments and at intersections. LOS ranges from LOS A (free flow, little congestion) to LOS F (forced flow, extreme congestion). KOA +"orporatiopn November 2010 City of Temecula Average Daily Traffic Volumes (ADT) YEAR 2008 2009 2010 Arnwlta Wa, north Amouth of Butterfield St• • e Road itterftetd to e IRc attarfiel J " ��u�ie;,., Bu'iucf Slate Road f3eattr rfiold Sta we Road Bud Sta e Road d Sta e Road etdtae orad 13 r 't a. o a - north of De Pr.rtot load norttt%ot Oita Ro north of Temecula Parkwa soutI off Channel Street 10254 41 „, 12108 8436 SO u1 h of N 1 htl awt Pass south of Paubr Road R hr, south of rncCalifornia Road south of R echo Vista Road south of Temecula Pakwa quo I k--Cff_ Date Street east of Ynez Road Date Street west of Marr artta Road De Portola Road east of Jedediah rnitfa Road De Portola Road east of Mar «rrt1a Road De Portota Road east of Mead Parkwa 'De Port( 9885 13570 4005 6566 9552 6979 a Road.west of Butterfield Stage Road 1Deer Hol tow Wa east of Pechan a Parkwa DeurDet Rel Road weswest of Pe 'ercorn Drive ' of Calte Pina C ofada D a toad north of Rancho California Road Dias Road north of Winchaster Road Dia Road south of Via Montezuma Low Flow Gros it Dias Road south of Winchester Roam First Street west of Old Town Front Street e tedtah Smlth Road east of Cabrillo load fedediah Srnitl Road north of Temecu ta Parte Jetfea°son Avenue south of Overland Drive "Jefferson Avenue south of Via Montezuma !Jefferso�r Avenue south of Winchester Road La Paz Street north of Temecula Parkwa Seren I_a Serena L La Serena eena Wr Wa, east of Margarita Ufa east. of Meadows Parkwa Wer west of Butterfield Stae_ east of Meadows Parkwa. Wa west of Meadows Part wa Linda (load west oe Lane arita f toad east of Avenwri Arita tr'a a-0-) OA, (-2411- V ft a Barca 7484 7685 3817 3369 4851 5646 2956 4856 9686 10282 11889 2995 1602 4881 20393 17222 23050 6465 8208 7148 4066 3308 3443 4017 NA 10663 11522 2984 4811 18908 I 16382: 21090 1717 NA as='1 5 1 t (/v-ef,._. YEAR Location 2008 2009 a)tsod, Rancho California Road Mea w, P'artwa rtc, rth of Temecula Parkway Meadows Parkway soul of La Serena W Meadows Parkway soufh of Leena Wav oulh 01 Pauba Road Meadows Parkway south of Rancho California Road Meadows Parkway south of Rancho Vista Road Meadows Parkway south of Sung Meadows Drive Montele.ro Wav north of Leena Wav Mora,.l Road north of Rancho California Road Nicolas Road south of North General Kearny Road Nicolas Road south of Winchester Road Nighthawk Pass east of Butterfield' Stadae Road Niahthawk Pass east of Calle Banuelos North General Kearney east of Mar. arita Road 9782 3730 8813 7976 7855 7958 6880 2595 10815 8637 17702 649 4314 Old Town Front Street north of Temecula Parkway, Old Town Front Street south of Main Street Old Town Front Street south of Ftarclo California 'load Overland Drive east of Jefferson Avenue Overland Drive east of Ynez Road Overland Drive west of Jefferson Avenue Overland Trail west of Bannanal Wav Pauba Road east of Maraarita Road Pauba Road east of Meadows Partwa Pauba Road east of Ynez Road Pauba Road west of Maraarita Road Pectianf a Parkwa north of Deer Hollow Wa Pechanaa Parkway north of Via Gilberto Pechan a Parkwa south of Pechanaa Road 9467 14387 17115 16362 NA 4036 5091 8746 9490 15479 8485 4492 3611 Pechanaa Parkwa south of Rainbow Canvon Road Pechanaa Parkway south of Wolf Valley Road Peooercorn Drive south of Corte Barela Puiol Street south of Main Street Puiol Street south of Sixth Street Rainbow Canyon Road south of Pechanaa Parkway Rancho California Road east of Diaz Road Rancho California Road east of Moraaa Road 9005 8692 14527 28005 8867 35962 26018 6256 30735 23826 34491 Rancho California Road east of Old Town Front Street Rancho California Road east of Ynez Road Rancho California Road west of Business Park Drive Flancho Calfomia Road west of Butterfield Stage Road Rancho Ca fornia Toad west of Diaz Road Rancho California Road west of Meadows Parkway Rancho Caifornia Road west of Ynez Road Rancho Vista Road east of Maraarita Road. Rancho Vista Road east of Ynez Road Ilancho Vista Road west of Butterfield Stage Road 'Rancho Vista Road west of Maraarita Road Rancho Vista Road west of Meadows lartcwa Redhawk Parkway north of Vail Ranch Parkway Redhawk Parkway south of Temecula Parkway Redhawk Parkwav south of Wolf Valley Road Redhawk Parkway west of El Chismal Road Redhawk Parkway west of Vail Ranch Parkway Santiaao Road east of Maraarita Road Santiaao Road west of Ynez Road Solana Way east 27477 4593 NA NA 6260 22497 33995 35474 37038 5618 14911 11809 22107 55947 7676 8908 1593 5348 5597 7679 1614 24561 10478 5378 17525 4393 6899 4962 17293 NA 5709 5320 Map of La Serena Way, Temecula, CA 92591 http://maps.yahoo.com/print?mvt=m&ioride=us&tp=1 &sty&fcat=&f... Map of La Serena Way, Temecula, CA 92591 CAI 0 Hot Springs ltd I IHeritage St De stint E) c Highland Vista Cir z g" vLe. .. -0: apr'.._. V c., 1. ro G ce Pky Eastc Hillcretst pr " P1 Rita Way 1000 ft When using any driving directions or map, it's a good idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists, watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to be used as an aid in planning. 1 of 1 7/7/2010 6:55 PM Map of 40430 Wgasa Pl, Temecula, CA 92591-6989 http: //maps.yahoo. com/print?mvt=m&ioride=us&tp=1 &stx=&fc at=&f... Map of 40430 Wgasa PI, Temecula, CA 92591-6989 YAH001„ \= 0/4,,,01 er (*lc/ad yo c;6 PelecttO Rd Kabwea Rd a d, c ain mi a .i k - - l.7 iwt Calle Char'trs Karen c Lynn 0 xe pvenIda o pel Retie css cater„ t y ve tO° kD G7 ,; Ca Serena Way a SOO m 1 of 1 Brit [00 Cir n c J vista. Q� Monte_ Yahoo 1O 0ataAP/IrE 1009 When using any driving directions or map, it's a good idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists, watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to be used as an aid in planning. 7/7/2010 7:31 PM Map of 40430 Wgasa Pl, Temecula, CA 92591-6989 1 of 1 http: //maps.yahoo. com/print?mvt=m&ioride=us &tp=1 &stx=&fcat=&f... Map of 40430 Wgasa PI, Temecula, CA 92591-6989 YA1--1O01e, Highland `lista Cir 0. Sonia Ln °i 3. Park _c! Vista Cir C.''' 'A z0 Andrews Way! Terrace a VIfry/ Cir z Ai c La5c9a`e II roe Grand View Ctr Hillcrest (7r _Rita Way .rn�iH^�riNiam�rvr?idVO^� Q! 0 a _lops P Gatlin St Caidary Baptist Christiar Sct° \ eget a. c r 0 fD G• 250 m 500 ft Riverton Park Yahonil201O ©aa, C..l" 200 When using any driving directions or map, it's a good idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists, watch out for construction, and folbw all traffic safety precautions. This Is only to be used as an aid in planning. 7/7/2010 7:42 PM Map of40430 Wgasa Pl, Temecula, CA 92591-6989 http://maps.yahoo.com/print?mvtni&ioride=us&tp=1&six=&fcat=&f... 3 Map of 40430 Wgasa PI, Temecula, CA 92591-6989 yAH001, -J 0. 0 • 61 _c o1d_Trai1 Cir P. Highland Vista C' Ar o_ a � Park Vista Cir Terrace I View Cir r c stc,,%ePky 250 m Q' Sona Ln drevrs.Way li 500 ft 0 ralryra Hot Springs 0 0 u d IOC J 10 ng Brush ea Or wrieta Hot Springs Rd cPoloCreekDr1_ J U • N U "Er. _ ,c 12 ▪ p v i� e• -31 Yaho 92010.iDaIV, NAVT EQ200r,1 When using any driving directions or map, it's a good idea to do a reality check and make sure the road still exists, watch out for construction, and follow all traffic safety precautions. This is only to be used as an aid in planning. 1 of 1 7/7/2010 7:55 PM I request that this be recorded in public record and is true to my knowledge of the facts in regards to agenda item no. 3 of the Dec.15t City Planning Hearing. The city planning department has shown great preferential treatment to this proposed project from the start. There was an attempt to push this through without notifying the public properly. There was a rushed traffic study, which is still improperly done. There was a waiving of the Environmental Impact Report, even though this property is located in a flood plain and it was required of the church located next door. There has also been a refusal to see that the formula being used for the number of parking spaces required is in fact WRONG. In the traffic impact report it was stated that essentially the traffic on those streets is already impacted, so what difference does it make if more cars are added during some of the heaviest traffic times? Let's answer that question, A LOT of difference. It can mean the difference of the possibility of an accident, or the certainty of one. It can mean to the residents living in that area extra time on the road, extra time away from family and the extra frustration of dealing with more traffic. It can mean that the high school students trying to get to functions such as football games on Friday nights, the same night that the Islamic Training Center holds its meetings, will run a greater risk of accidents, including pedestrian ones as the teens venture to the fast food restaurants across the street. The traffic impact study did not even address the impact that this will have on the highway. The exit at Winchester already backs up for a mile and has had a multitude of accidents under current conditions. Based on the imam's own statements that the intention of this building is to bring in those from surrounding communities, we can surmise that there will be an increase in the number of cars utilizing this exit. Please do not insult our intelligence that a new exit ramp will be going in soon to compensate. Anyone who can read, listen to the news knows that this state is broke and that it is highly unlikely that that project will be occurring anytime in the near future. Likewise, one only has to look south to the current highway project in San Diego to note just how "quickly" these projects truly occur. What we are left with is the fact that the highway will back up further, thereby causing more accidents and physical injury to the citizens of Temecula, Murrieta and French Valley. As for your flawed formula for parking spaces, you are basing it on a model that is not pertinent to the model at hand. In a regular church families sit in pews, or chairs in the sanctuary, thereby allowing for approximately 4 people per car per 35 sq. ft. The islamists do not "sit" in chairs, or pews, nor do they have families in the "sanctuary," they stand shoulder to shoulder and only enough room as it takes to go straight down on your knees, face to the ground, thereby fitting considerably more people in the same space as a traditional church. Between the fact that it is only the male of the family in the main area and the required space needed is certainly NOT 35 sq. ft. per person/family, your number of parking spaces is grossly underestimated. Since you refuse to look at the facts, I then ask where will all of those cars go to park? Answer- the neighborhood, which you will now be intentionally negatively impacting. I leave you with one final thought, this imam has refused to denounce organizations that are labeled by the United States government as terrorist organizations and enemies of the state. He is affiliated with organizations that have been indicted for terrorist activities and had its members either deported, or incarcerated for terrorist activities. According to the Patriot Act if you enable this individual to further his cause and that cause culminates in violence, you will be held personally liable for said actions. To say that no violence has occurred to this point is not only naive, but an ignorant statement to make. All of those who perpetrated acts of violence on this country, including those of 9/11 and the man currently on the top of the wanted "dead, or alive" list and one of the leaders of al Qaeda, Anwar AI-Awlaki, whom I also might remind you was the leader of an islamic training center from right here in San Diego, were said to be "peaceful" right up until they perpetrated their acts. I would also like on record that the City Planning Department had placed this PDF on public display by Nov.26th, five days before the hearing occurred, yet had already made its decision claiming they had heard all arguments. Planning Commission approval of Islamic Training Center - violation of Brown Act? m y " U .V !. g I � 2010080802880 P hill � llsera!��al c,�fl� lr�c,agatl�:�hriJ��Vi�� y�k�,rlr ��sht,l:.Ylh� a z �<� �x1ua �, ai �b�,¢�l��I�Mu�l�&��d,�0 30 .. ...... .......... DF 1---5 lG.yiA. �i 5 AAAa c-e..1`,3`i e ;6 a ' iia ;k3 6/ w :�,,,,� �9 ► t1^- A_ S oc�A, (� 6 l �-h`c &l aM of ca . l S 5+-e..,.. 1 � Ik-d (off s vtf r tai c -c, t;3 l o u s 0-0-110")----k- ; S a-(iA-teS kA, . l cta4 . �-- ' rr re � �J C` �.� 1 oke u Does 4�0� f-ry 4, 1 of � Naq:5• 4-0 owe- -l-o evv. Met) y • 1 a 'ol &1( L iI410 wncat 5 €5 December 1, 2010 Before any facility is approved for the lot in question the city and or Mosque need to improve all infra -structure, by this I mean widen Nicolas road to the planned 4 lane arterial road, put in proper drainage, and continue Nicolas through Roripaugh to Butterfield stage. Nicolas road is a serious traffic nightmare -visualize thousands of cars �{S traveling this 2 lane twisted, potholed road, at 30 or 40)o6nore MPH; it is a cut through street for all of North Temecula and these traffic studies inadequate. According to --`/ Patrick Richardson, the traffic was studied when the High School gets out at 2730-3:00 pm, but the true peak hours are between 6-8 am and 5-7:30 pm, when people travel to and from work. Thousands of cars pour onto that road a day with up to 10 trips per household per day. This street can not accommodate this traffic load. The problem in this city is poor planning and infrastructure, which has led to our constipated traffic problem. A full environmental impact report needs to be done because this Mosque �K� S /546/7e - construction is planned in a 100 year flood plain.4 A negative mitigated declaration signed by Eric Jones is not enough. This is essentially a checklist. If you read the report all of the boxes are checked less than significant with mitigation, less than significant, or no impact. No facility is to be built on a 100 year flood plain, according to the Temecula general plan policy 1.7 for public safety. The map (show map) is from the city of Riverside and shows that 1/2 to 2/3 of the lot is in the flood plain. To not have a full environmental impact report on this lot is negligent and hazardous. 1 I am presenting to you Planning Commission resolution 10 from your own PDF file next to agenda item number 3 on the internet posted for this meeting in late November before this meeting took place. What I am holding is this document that states you have already considered our testimony and approved the application. How is it possible that you listened to our testimony before it was even given? Do you have a time machine? I received this copy from Mr. Richardson on Nov 29 when I asked for the Continuing Use Permit. It is written in the past tense and on the front and back page states passed approved and adopted by the city of Temecula Dec 1, 2010. I do not want to believe my city council and planners are reflective of the city of Bell, but after seeing this I am more concerned every day. I at;i1=Stis meeting to be postponed as it seems you have already decided,and that we be given a town hall meeting to voice our concerns. I request these documents be recreated in an unbiased way which actually would indicate you would listen to the citizens and this may require the planning commission as well as Patrick Richardson and Eric Jones to step down. I request these statements be placed into the public record, as I believe them to be true. Dec 1, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda item 3 2 tPN957140011.pdf - Powered by Google Docs G:Fom�il t;aalaaiiingr Documents I13padgiir ElpEg. wr M r )a' tG Joc„. APN957140011.pdf- Powered by Google Docs File View https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid-0.1 &thid=12c... r ,,e#Laa?:?, L_ plynes@gmail.com 1 Settings • 1 Sign out Save in Google Docs Share vi Search the dui 1 of 1 11/17/2010 9:35 PM Figure PS -2 Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas UPI Of ZEMECUIP, GENERA PIA% Legend 100 Year Flood Zone Dam Inundation Areas • — Temecula City Boundary • Sphere of Influence Boundary Planning Area Boundary 11 r.. ohliv Sources: City of Temecula, FEMA Q3 Flood Data. t,d��V§^aaC 'f111111M1111111111111111111111111111, 111 11111 1111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 _"dull 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111 .1,1111 ,,11.1111111111011111111111111111111111111 � 5,000 10,000 C I T Y OF TEMECULA PS -11 GENERAL PLAN 1-v-otot -o Dear Planning Commission, My name is Laura Scott and before I speak I want to state that I am not here to pass judgment on The Temecula Valley Mosque or Muslims in -general. I have insufficient data to do either. That being said; I feel that, at this time, Nicolas Road cannot support another facility of this magnitude. I say this because of the fact that the current road is only a double lane, poorly maintained (with potholes), and has a poor drainage system in place. I also say this because, if there ever was a major disaster, Nicolas Road would be inadequate to handle a mass exodus from all three churches at the same time. Now there are sorne who might argue that therearealready two churches on Nicolas Road what's a third. The other two churches in question are well established and were built when the population in this valley was considerably less. Therefore at this time I would ask you to reconsider granting this permit to The Temecula Valley Mosque until Nicolas Road has been expanded and is able to handle the extra traffic. Please put my statements, as I believe them to be true into public record for agenda number 3. I thank you for your time in this matter. SAFETY CONCERNS RE: TEMECULA MOSQUE My name is Julie Gilbart, and I have been an area resident for 19 years. My concern about the mosque is a safety issue. As you can see by this diagram, the mosque property sits on a corner bordered by Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. Directly across Calle Colibri, is Calvary Baptist Church. The only access into or out of the parking areas of either the Baptist church or the mosque is onto Calle Colibri. This street is a narrow lane that deadends into the property after approximately 350 feet, and is identified in the Thomas Guide as a "minor road". The other end of the road opens onto Nicolas. There are no stop signs on Nicolas at this juncture. Currently, Calvary has 116 parking spaces and the mosque, at completion, will have 181. In addition, adjacent to Calvary on the other side is Grace Presbyterian, which has 151 parking spaces, with egress to Nicolas. According to the "Statement of Operations" report provided by ICTV, the mosque will have operations every day of the week during Phase One -- including Sundays — and by Phase Two the hours will increase to be every day of the week from noon to 10:00 pm. Again, this includes Sundays. This means the mosque and Calvary will be having operations on Sundays at the same time, as well as during the week when both facilities will hold various youth events, meetings, potlucks, etc. My concern is that in the event of an emergency situation where both facilities would need to be immediately evacuated — such as a fire or bomb threat — you could realistically expect to have almost 300 cars trying to exit the two parking lots of the mosque and Calvary Church at the same time onto tiny Calle Colibri, and then merge onto Nicolas Road — which would also have to accommodate the evacuation traffic coming out of Grace Presbyterian — another 151 cars. Nicolas is a "secondary road" with two lanes that hasn't been upgraded since it was built decades ago, when there was far less traffic and the churches non-existent. It's already heavily congested at peak hours. How would it accommodate 450 cars at once in such an emergency? Furthermore, how would fire trucks or other emergency vehicles enter the property with a mass exodus of cars clogging Calle Colibri? It's obviously an untenable situation that would jeopardize the lives of everyone involved. Unless and until this emergency traffic situation is rectified, I urge the Commission to reject the mosque at this location. c,C 6t1 .4 614 lik14 doem4.-- (f5 -010 7(.22-71./ , Jc- Eric Jones From: Patrick Richardson Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:14 AM To: Cynthia Lariccia; Eric Jones Subject: FW: COPY: Citizen Web Contact: Commissions and Boards» Planning Commission (Supervisor Version) Please make sure a copy of this complaint is added to the record. From: City Website Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 5:34 PM To: Patrick Richardson Subject: COPY: Citizen Web Contact: Commissions and Boards » Planning Commission (Supervisor Version) This copy is sent to you because you are the Director/Supervisor contact for this topic. If the primary person (Denise.Caravelli@cityoftemecula.org) is absent, please follow up with the citizen. A Contact Us Web Form has been submitted to: Commissions and Boards » Planning Commission First Name: Robert Last Name: Leanza Email Address: leanza.rob@verizon.net Address: 40164 Stowe Road City: Temecula State: CA Zip: 92591 Phone: (9516992473) Type of Request: Complaint Description: Just another follow-up regarding how our City could allow another terrorist distribution center to be built in this area!? Islam is NOT a religion. It is a political ideology whose purpose is to convert the world to Sharia law and to the worship of Islam. Those who oppose are murdered and raped. Please take a look at what is happening in Europe. In this example, it is France. Please click on the link (or put into your web browser) and just look at what is happening world-wide. America is already headed in the same direction. Thank you. Additional Information or Comments: This is a shocking clip form CBN News in Paris: http : //downlo ads. cbn. com/cbnnewsplayer/cbnplayer.swf? aid=1793 3 1 DANIEL A. RA 1^',1 7(10 1, J1,1 eid iy # rt Jed e 4,14). - X.41 7 ,t1 ere ova'? I/tap- 4/4, 43963 Gatewomi.V.Vay • lernecula„ CA 92592 (951.) 676-8464 • FAX (9.51) 695-3707 V 15 Lry [ as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history. Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen In 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants. The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism - one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time. The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free -thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior education al system and a history of humanitarianism. Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite? By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim -exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam f J c!t The New York Post in 2002 ran an article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted v M1 0,1 7 rJ B.) CC� accurately that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported: "Muslim immigrants..constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending." "Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non - Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes." "Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane." "Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem." "Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not -that -remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40,years will be Muslim." �� aka 0 respect Tor uanisn values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and the U.S.: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who as a teenager had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today. In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non -generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. (Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of "racism" by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too -lax immigration.) If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy any more to move your friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to bui Id a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't. In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system as it existed was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. "We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration. The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now," he said. A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, "The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference," Hvilshoj says, "There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come." And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, "In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech." Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark. The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce. Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. < /STRONG> Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Americans clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in America look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history . . We would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own. rol.peRA r:a n elf `:" !Cs ::a47 c 11 "The Qur'an: Qur'an (5:51) - "0 you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people." Qur'an (5:80) - "You will see many of them befriending those who disbelieve; certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before for them, that Allah became displeased with them and in chastisement shall they abide." Those Muslims who befriend unbelievers will abide in hell. Qur'an (3:28) - "Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them..." This last part means that the Muslim is allowed to feign friendship if it is of benefit. Renowned scholar Ibn Kathir states that "believers are allowed to show friendship outwardly, but never inwardly." Qur'an (3:118) - "0 you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people, they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement hatred has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what their breasts conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the communications clear to you, if you will understand." This verse not only warns Muslims not to take non -Muslims as friends, but it establishes the deep-seated paranoia that the rest of the world is out to get them. Qur'an (9:23) - "0 ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Whoso of you taketh them for friends, such are wrong -doers" Even family members are not to be taken as friends if they do not accept Islam. (This is the mildest interpretation of this verse from the 9th Sura, which also advocates "slaying the unbeliever wherever ye find them"). Qur'an (53:29) - "Therefore shun those who turn away from Our Message and desire nothing but the life of this world." Qur'an (3:85) - "And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers." Qur'an (3:10) - "(As for) those who disbelieve, surely neither their wealth nor their children shall avail them in the least against Allah, and these it is who are the fuel of the fire." Those who do not believe in Muhammad are but fuel for the fire of Hell (also 66:6, 2:24. 21:98). Qur'an (7:44) - "The Companions of the Garden will call out to the Companions of the Fire: "We have indeed found the promises of our Lord to us true: Have you also found Your Lord's promises true?" They shall say, "Yes"; but a crier shall proclaim between them: "The curse of Allah is on the wrong -doers" Muslims in heaven will amuse themselves by looking down on non -Muslims in Hell and mocking them while they are being tortured (see 22:19-22. Qur'an (1:5-7) - "Show us the straight path, The path of those whom Thou hast favoured; Not the (path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray" This is a prayer that Muslims are supposed to repeat each day. "Those who earn Thine anger" specifically refers to Jews and "those who go astray" refers to Christians (see Bukhari (12:749)). There are verses that contradict the above however the peaceful friendship verses were written when Mohammed had few followers and when he had many follower the verses switched to violence. The previous verses were abrogated by the later verses. If verses contradict each other that should be a big question as to the validity of such a faith. So Mr. President if you are not a Muslim why are you using Al Taqiyah to deceive the American people about Islam. Wake up America, just look at the evidence. Keith Davies Executive Director Wald Shoebat Foundation righterdrnaire Page New folder Quick views Flagged Photos Office docs Shipping updates Messenger Sign in to Messenger Home Contacts Calendar get help easily OL. These pictures are of Muslir v.; 42 V (:\ \) Custoi plans Switch *Residents Get More tAki/ -NY vj '40 1 .00.0.1k 1111111 December 7, 2010 Honorable Jeff Comerchero Mayor of Temecula City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589 Subject: Planning Commission not properly mandated to decide on proposed Temecula Valley Islamic Center plan Dear Mr. Comerchero, The open hearing conducted by the planning commission on December 1, 2010 on the application and conditional use permit for the construction of a two-story 24,943 sq. ft. Mosque to be located at the comer of Nicolas and Calle Collibri roads illustrated the fact that the planning staff recommendation was not properly mandated to make such a consideration. We are not against those who want to worship their Allah, but we oppose any preaching that encourages the barbaric laws of Shariah that supersede our constitution. We understand that the City has to act per the laws and statutes that apply. We would expect that the city would not ignore the laws and statutes, such as (California Environmental Quality Act) CEQA that try to protect our community. All five members of the commission and staff listened to staff and consultants present their findings on the impact of this development on parking, traffic, noise, and safety, that ultimately resulted in a CEQA negative declaration, meaning that the project has either no impact to the community environment or all impacts that were determined will be fully mitigated by the conditions of approval. In other words, considerations that fall outside the statutes in force, such as, the uses associated with a mosque, which are different than a church or temple, were not understood or addressed. Examples of these differences include the time of prayer during rush hour traffic, limiting the evaluation of parking to an equivalent 6,000 sq. ft. structure, and the Islamic practice of separation of men and women during prayer times. Furthermore, these statutes do not address the actual activities that go on inside and around the mosque, nor any understanding of the connection between mosques from other localities. This is evident by not requiring parking spaces for this almost 25,000 sq. ft. gathering place. The federal "Religious Freedom" law does not discriminate, or give preferential treatment to organizations that do not meet the guidelines of, nor make them otherwise exempt from CEQA. Examples of this were given such as a Greek Orthodox Church and a Christian church that did not meet these requirements and were denied a conditional use permit by the City. It is clear that your commissioners, while listening to 90 people over a period of five hours present both opposing and supporting arguments, had already made up their minds based on the provided, but deficient staff report, before they ruled unanimously in favor of the Mosque. Page 1 of 2 We, as Concerned American Citizens (CAC), an ever-growing force in the community, would ask that rather than focusing on the "Constitutionality of the City of Temecula and its reputation" as you were quoted in the Press Enterprise last Friday, focus on the safety and security of your citizens and the requirements of CEQA. Concerned American Citizens respects the religious beliefs of others and wants to enforce our constitution as intended. We do not want any organization established here that condones 7th century barbaric laws, such as the killing of non-Muslims, degradation of women and pedophilia. These are the parts of the Islamic ideology that must be denounced. Furthermore, the security of the community and its citizens is compromised when Imam Harmoush will not publically denounce Hamas and Hezbollah as a terrorist organization. His affiliation with Progressive Jewish Alliance, Islamic Shura Council, Muslim Public Affairs and many others give cause for alarm as to what type of dogma will be expanded in the community. Mr. Comerchero, we know how much you have contributed to the community especially being instrumental in the children's museum and very active in the local Boys and Girls Club to know that we want a safe place for our children and grandchildren. We ask that you step in and lead this community to a solution, perhaps, not yet done, that puts the appropriate controls on this Mosque. It is this kind of leadership that encourages and brings in development to the City and gives courage to other communities to stop the aggressive Islamic expansion that is being funded by Saudi Arabia throughout America. Respectfully ours Mano Bakh, Concerned American Citizens 714-381-2175 P.O. Box 418 Wildomar, Ca. 92595 Cc: Mr. Carl R. Carey Chairman Planning Commission City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589 Temecula City Planning Commission Temecula City Council Page 2 of 2 I am Zorina Bennett, and I live within the sphere of Temecula and have family members and friends here who will all be affected in one way or another by an Islamic mosque training center. Any one of you, I, or anyone else can go onto the internet and find pictures and information on hundreds, even thousands of mosques around the world. They all have towering minarets equipped with LOUD SPEAKERS which are used to make announcements and call people to assembly FIVE TIMES PER DAY from early morning to evening. Many of these sites even have audio meaning that everyone must listen to this which can be heard from long distances away. They are always loud and an assult on the communities normal activities. Citizens of our community do not care to hear such intrusive noises. This is an interruption on our community and our way of life. No other building is allowed to make such offensive noises. Our churches cannot ring their beautiful hells so why must we tolerated these shouts! The plans that I have seen for the mosque in Temecula do not show a minaret. Those plans are inaccurate. Plans show that a taller than permitted Minaret at approx 50 feet tall towering over the Baptist church next door is mentioned. This exception needs to be appropriately addressed before anything else is considered. Those towers should not be any taller than any nearby churches steeples. IF PLANS ARE APPROVED THEY WILL NO DOUBT DEMAND MINARETS so this should be included in those plans now, with the appropriate height limitations, noise limitations and with monitoring stations that will alert the authorities of abusive load noises interrupting all the neighbors, churches and businesses in the entire surrounding areas. Further, the building plans are for a large, hugely, domed structure with high small windows this is not consistent with the low keyed Mediterranean architectural styles in this area. I find this utterly distasteful. This 25,000 square foot building will certainly accommodate more than five or six hundred people during a peak event and on Fridays, the busiest traffic day and additional nearby school events. Contemporary church designs of 25,000 sq feet accommodate more than 1100 people. Therefore the less than 200 planned parking spaces for this facility are inadequate. The facility and infrastructure calculations should be revised as appropriate for the mosque population density which vary considerably from similar sized church facilities to as much as 300% greater density than a church. Also there is no consideration or mention of the school rooms and times children will be transported to and from classes adding to the traffic congestion in that very constricted area. Finally, please place my statement into the Public Record as I believe them to be true. Agenda No. (3) Thank you, 7 � % ozz/7 — JA Sri a„ DUI L YY NIE. ; I S III ° I ' : 1 J1,1:C�'~�: Islam is already controlling our daily lives. Airport screenings are a direct result of Islam in America. 3 air ui c � uur �� r bowfhi it beo b d Here is what daily life in modern America will look like when sharia law is imposed on us. I hesitate to say "if" this is imposed on us because we are already in the preliminary stages of Islamic authoritarianism, and the lack of protest against it suggests this trend will continue for some time. 1 .lf you have a public swimming pool in your city or community, half of each day or even of each week will be reserved solely for women. If it is outdoors or is an indoor facility, a high solid fence and/or heavy curtains will be installed to prevent outsiders from seeing the women. (Note: this has already been done in Great Britain). 2.Seating at public events, theatres, movies, concerts, sports arenas and other public facilities will be divided, with women required to sit on one side and men on the other whether they are married or not. 3.A11 institutions, companies, public buildings, recreational facilities and municipal government facilities will be required to suspend their work five times a day to allow Muslims to pray. Prayer facilities for Muslims only will be mandatory, one for women and one for men. 4.The serving of pork and pork products such as ham and bacon, seafood, and other non -halal foods will be prohibited in schools and all public institutions and public places. Food preparation companies that provide food to these places will be prohibited from preparing non= -halal foods or foods containing non=halal ingredients on their premises. 5.The sale and serving of alcoholic beverages will be prohibited in all public facilities such as cafes, pubs, airplanes, trains, etc., with consumption of them allowed only in private homes and membership clubs. 6.The distribution and sale of Christian and Jewish religious materials such as the Old and New Testaments will be banned. 7.Universities will be prohibited from teaching courses about the history of non -Muslim religions. 8.Study of the Koran in all schools will be mandatory. 9.Criminal penalties will be imposed on anyone questioning or criticizing Islam, its books and its prophet, ranging from fines to imprisonment to execution. These will also apply to Muslims who date or marry non -Muslims. 10.Head covering will be required of all Muslim women everywhere and at all times. 11.Muslims will attempt to amend the Pledge of Allegiance to add the words "and his prophet Mohammed" after the word "God". This will eventually be extended to American coins and paper currency. 12.The beating, physical abuse or murder of Muslim women by their husbands or male family members will not be punishable by law. 13.The possession or harboring of dogs will be banned. Loose dogs will be killed. 14 Sale of'immodest" clothing and lingerie will be banned. Women wearing 'immodest" clothing will be arrested and punished. 15.Taxi drivers will be prohibited from taking on passengers who carry alcoholic beverages. (Minneapolis taxi drivers already tried this). Guide to Islamic Invasion of America by 2020 ui AMERICA! I:CA! °1'(JiCUR I,11TIES ARE , "I" MIS 10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student cen- ters (now 1500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are 300 ex- clusively Muslim schools with loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution. 11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish "Centers for Islamic studies" with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher education institutions. 12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, not the truth, which is Islam hijacked the terrorists. Furthermore in January of 2002, Saudi Arabia's Embassy in Washington mailed 4500 packets of the Quran, videos, promoting Islam to America's high schools—free. They would never allow us to reciprocate. 13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards the Mus- lims in America ho are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries. 14. Nullify America's sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodi- cally terrorize Americans of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls. (We have experienced this too often since 9-11.) 15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not American's justice system. 16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S. but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dol- lars. 17. Raise interest in Islam on America's campuses by insisting that freshman take at least one course on Islam. Be sure that the writer is a bonafide American, Christian, scholarly and able to cover up the violence in the Quran and express the peaceful, spiritual and religious aspect only. 18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by interne and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media of their visibility. 19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook. 20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the US by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America. Join US Concerned American Citizens. ori' THE SYNDROME I'm a senior citizen, a veteran, a patriot, and I love America and its people. I'm a Christian but do not attend church services except for funerals and weddings_ I am a Zionist but enjoy bacon too much to convert to Judaism. I've been given the opportunity to accept Islam and rejected that completely. I've lived in Judaeo-Christian, Islamic, Buddhist, Shinto, pagan, and other cultures and have observed goodness in all places. During my ten years in Islamic societies, I saw pure evil in action, more than any other places I have lived during my 25 -years outside of the USA. I am an American! I find my nation divided. I am a Christian! I find Christendom divided. I am a Zionist! I find the house of David divided. I am Islam Aware! Islam is the main thread of my book, Di Di Daw Daw Di Di. I find Dar -al -Islam united against a divided America, a divided Christianity, and a divided House of David. Americans, Christians, and Jews share a shameful syndrome that has only recently been identified and named because of multiple and continuing acts of jihad, both violent and subliminal, issuing from Islam over 1389 years. As Islam consumed the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula, swept across North Africa, and laid into Europe, the Islamists became adept at dividing and conquering, and subduing - driving the conquered into despair. The conquered peoples were (and continue to be) horribly brutalized by their Islamic conquerors, and compelled to struggle to survive in their humiliating dhimmi roles which have (I believe) set up cultural relationship roles over centuries, and which persist today. The alternative for the conquered was to abandon their faith in the one and only true God and convert to Ism, to die horrible tortured d-millsor forcefully submit to lives of misery and subjugation. Courageous beyond belief in the face of the most onerous oppression, these generations of humbled Jews and Christians should all be considered saints for their steadfast love of God and his son, Jesus. The Islamist conquerors selected (compelled) one submissive infidel group in a given place to be their servants pitted against the others, and vice -versa. Thus, Christians became distrustful of their neighboring Jews and other Christians, and Jews could not trust their Jewish and Christian neighbors. Enmity arose, and this strengthened the Islamist oppressors. Islam identifies Jews and Christians as `people of the book' because they were 'born Moslems' but haven't figured it out yet, and haven't accepted Islam. These `people of the book' are considered apostates and apostates are doomed to death or acceptance of lower caste status in Dar -al -Islam where they are dumped on regularly, are subjected to special taxes, including blood taxes (where some Jewish and Christian children are stolen by the Moslem masters and enslaved (sex slaves)), and more. In most places, Jews were identified by yellow stars (oh, yes, the Nazis borrowed this from their 20th century Moslem allies) sewn into their clothing, and Christians had other identification such as special hair cuts, etc. Both were forced to wear special garb and long beards so their Moslem masters could grab their beards while they hit and slapped these dhimmis who were (still are) not allowed to defend themselves thus accepting their degrading humiliation. Jewish and Christian women, young boys, and girls were (are) often taken off to be repeatedly raped, and then dumped back into their communities. This still occurs even today in places like Egypt, the Sudan, Pakistan, Indonesia, etc., and now in England, France, Germany, Sweden, and other places in Europe, increasingly referred to as Eurabia. In places such as al Andalusia - Spain, the Jews were placed into positions of tax collectors and informants for their Mohammedan masters. Cleverly, the Jews took advantage of the situation and prospered better than Christians, and when the Christians took umbrage with the Jews, the Jews sought protection from the Islamists. At times the Jews took an active role in quelling Christian uprisings, and actually protected their Moslem masters, their tormenters. Christians were driven into similar roles at times. Over the centuries, a terrible enmity between Spain's Jews and Christians evolved and their Islamists captors/masters exploited this constantly. In the fifteenth century, the Christian King Ferdinand was able to push the Islamists (Moors) out of the Iberian peninsula, and the pogroms against Jews started, eventually driving them out of Spain and Portugal. Jews, fleeing from the vengeful Spaniards and Portuguese fled to the `protection' of their Islamist masters and tormenters, and in tum served them well (they had little choice) as hated, submissive dhimmis. They are known as Sephardi or Mizrabi Jews. Other (Ashkenazi) Jews remained in Europe and did not seek `protection' from the hated Islamists and toughed it out suffering their own tribulations amongst vengeful Christians like Martin Luther. Over the past ninety years as Jews from around the world migrated to their homeland (Palestine) and created modern Israel, they have mingled and become one nation free from Islamist and Christian oppression. Most of these wonderful people treasure their liberty and freedom, and yet some still defend their former oppressors. Given opportunities to do otherwise, these hostage dhimmis have adopted their Stockholm Syndrome and continue protecting and defending their tormentors. This is more than a bad habit. Millions of Jews have come to the United States, the most tolerant nation on earth, where they thrive. Half of them still behave as dhimmis, striving (Stockholm Syndrome) to protect those who would again enslave them, and seemingly begging for another holocaust, greater and more violent even than Hitler's final solution. Dismayed, I have seen this played out at a Synagogue near my home where an Imam was invited to spread his takiyya laden da`wa, and I was in attendance. When challenged by visiting Jews of courage, they were pounced upon by the Synagogue's Stockholm Syndrome enhanced members; one, a nasty old man who viciously challenged an Israeli -American's citizenship and her right to even be in America. Both of these antagonists are Jews. Now, faced with Islamist expansion in Europe and in the United States, issues are arising and I find that a large number of people in America are willfully ignorant (applied Stockholm Syndrome) about Islam and the societal train wreck called Islam (submission) thundering towards us. Jews like Michael Bloomberg are the worst kind of Stockholm Syndrome affected dhimmi, the kind of craven coward who would shove his own mother under the proverbial bus in order to gain a few shekels and favors from his Moslem masters. Mayor Bloomberg supports the Islamist victory symbol of conquest and domination at New York's Ground Zero. He does so because he, like George Soros is in fact in bed with the Moslems with many millions invested in the Middle East. He knows that if he exhibited a shred of courage and opposed the Ground Zero Cordoba Initiative (Mosque), the Islamists would cause his millions to vanish, and Bloomberg would rather wish a holocaust on us than lose a shekel. He is a living example of applied Stockholm Syndrome. In Temecula, California, growing numbers of citizens and patriots are lining up in opposition to a Grand Mosque of nearly 25,000 square feet. Some city officials (some of whom are Jews) are draining their bladders in their drawers (Stockholm Syndrome) in fear of offending the Islamists with any negative actions directed against the Grand Mosque. Certain officials of the City of Temecula are (not very discretely) supportive (Stockholm Syndrome) of the Grand Islamic (Terrorist) Center being proposed in Temecula These dhimmi cowards have not even been held hostage and are already exhibiting classic signs of the Stockholm Syndrome, defending and protecting those who would be their tormentors. Sha Shtil There are two urban legends in the international Jewish diaspora. One is when there is a change, whether, political, economic or social the querulous response "is it good for the Jews"? The other is the legendary response in Yiddish by a Jewish mother during the murderous Kishinev pogroms in Czarist Moldavia in 1903: "sha shtil kinder" or "be quiet and sit still children and it will all be over." Jews who cowered before their oppressors and remain silent are referred to "sha shtil yidn". In 1938, Revisionist Jewish leader, Ze'ev Jabotinsky, mounted the bimah (podium) in a Vilna, Lithuania synagogue to warn his fellow Jews in yiddish: "EHR KUMT. YIDN FARLAWST AYER SHTETL — He's coming. Jews abandon your city." Jabotinsky was referring to the Nazi Holocaust, which would result in the murder of six million European Jewish men, women and children, including many who didn't heed Jabotinsky's warning in Vilna. That warning is now being given by a good friend of Israel and the Jewish people, M.P. Geert Wilders, the implacable enemy of Islamization of The Netherlands, the EU, UK and America . Yet, the Jewish leadership in both Europe and America behaves like the sha shtil yidin cowering during the Kishinev Pogrom. F4_d of America (P 1IECOIVIMENDED READING The Islamic Strategies and The Christian Response. This book reflects the cry of Abdul- lah's heart to offer America an eye-opening wake-up call. It is far more than just another book on Is- lam. It unveils the Islamic strategies used to Islamize America. It offers a practical plan to stop the oblit- eration of our. Christian civilization before it is too late. This book is available thru: The Islamization of American Schools Under the guise of teaching "World history and geography," Muslim activists are infiltrating the Ameri- can educational system. The impressionable young minds of our boys and girls are being indoctri- nated to potentially accept and embrace the religion of Islam. This is the goal behind the course on Islam that is currently being taught to the 7th graders in the California public school system and other schools around the country. r;./ N 4 1. it http://www.Isla _ ': eview.com http://www.booklocker.com/books/1413.html Shia " -Law for N r -M ,r<s - Author Bill Warner This book is an excellent, MUST read expose on Sharia Law that will take you from zero to knowing more about Sharia Law (Is is Law) and political Islam than 98% of the American public. I strongly urge all legislators, pub- lic se ts, law enforcement and clergy (and anyone else who cares about this threat) to get this "silver bullet" of knowledge that is all resource based and tightly composed. There is zero fluff or opinion in this book. It is incredi- bly easy to read and serves as an excellent resource for educating others on this topic. I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand the gr , threat facing + . 'ca and the civil' nations of the workl. http://\v%vw.cspipublishing.com%S,aria_ Law_ for Nott ;'IiHlitis.htiii ESCAPING ISLAM - Author Mano Bakh We may all have crossed paths with Iranians, and we may read the paper daily to see the Muslim conflicts around the world. This book helps us understand what is really at the heart of these issues, how once again religious fervor is misused and becomes something truly evil. There is nothing like a personal story and perspective to help us all understand and perhaps combat the forces and "traps" which are at work even now to destroy the good works being done in other cultures and faiths around the world....and they are not as far away from our own backyard as we may think! This book is a riveting account of a religion "gone bad" when distorted by those who would set out to destroy the freedoms that so many take for THEY MUST BE STOPPED! - Author Bridgette Gabriel They Must Be Stopped is a wake-up call for the West which "wallows in a state of denial and ignorance, bullied by political correctness and refusing to listen to our enemies who have an understanding of peace and tolerance different from ours." She shows that democratization is not an end in itself. Hamas and Hezbollah, for instance, are democratically elected terrorist organizations. Di Di Daw Daw Di D, DiDiDawDawDiDi - Author Jim Horm But I really had no choice. This is a no-nonsense discourse on Islam that should be required reading for everyone in the federal government. While some of the book has been edited by the CIA, it still contains a great deal of information that you will not find anywhere else. The author has a wealth of experience living in Islamic coun- tries during many years of service stationed at various American Embassies. Even in "moderate," Islamic coun- tries like Turkey there is a defining undercurrent of thought that is diametrically opposed to fundamental Ameri- can Values of freedom, independent thought and liberty. If you are looking for a politically correct, "can't we all just get along," approach, you wont find it here. This is the unvarnished truth about the philosophical battle that will define the future course of history. It is thoroughly compelling reading. www.shoebat.com/ �w,t�xta��t CHRISTI ACTION NETWO.0 sti, etion.org "Today Jamaat ul-Fugra has more than 35 suspected communes and more than 3,000 members spread across the United States, all in support of one goal: the purification of Islam through violence." TERROR ... is coming to America's schools. And the experts believe it's not a question of "if" ... but "when." According, to a "restricted" Law enforcement report: "Preparations for attacks on American schools that will bring rivers of blood and staggering body counts are well underway in Islamic terrorist camps." v is Saudi Aa • the US.? .ding and recrua a homegrown terrorists ISLAM RISING: Geert Wilders Warning to the West Geert Wilders lives with a constant death threat over his head. Al-Qaeda has vowed to kill him. As a Dutch parliamentar- ian and outspoken critic of radical Islam, Mr. Wilders must travel with four bodyguards and sleep in a safe house, each and vww. concernedamericancitizens. org - vww. actforamerica. com vww. shoebat. com vww. christianaction. org vww islamreview. com Lttp : //cspipublishing. com/ V\ °wv°.thc Separating Sharia Law from Islam - We are in for the fight of our lives and we must ACT! - before it's too late. - Former PLO Terrorist Now Speaks Out For USA and Israel. - For truth about the terrorsim from Islam in America. - The Islamic Strategies and The Christian Response. - What is the true nature of Islam? ASI es tarl' 4T,Fr- '11t1 Enemy Canlps S41r 'ound U'$ - Ittp:Ifatlassl ru' 4)O.typeaaci.ec:r�.y 1.1eta://bauserr i sruaysr()rctp a; sus. p:// w L__ s i is < tt oolisyt I t� Ifti lhArwvv,wi°sati i a. a i lii vi...vss.w i3�O43.;fica ��i i m,sw°i sig Ill i :ssar�m i..,:s�o �r Ainsole filt: as and swre.pe., i°m wtl ti .e 0:11,.....v!„vv.w ,a..ITICN:lh CiG ()N(Y.2j.),/ at1). 11l.' °6h.M. 'hNi i "p.(" if C.C.) 101' .2 I �dj N iv iNt,k�V6", IW II'��.m�.uiU��4t°r �ptl,V°�,°'I ry�r r��,� N�9 11p 81111. 11 r t r,aque •• tirN) 0011111 Nn o„ "Illlll dl G° C''04) �IIIII� Illlllq p+lllllll� (' ) IIIIIIII 11111111111111 111'1111111111111111VVVV14 WIIIIIIIII Illlllllllllllllm 4111~.. 1 Hal Mlux •IIISIIIIII 4 i• .54 cd ›.1 cu a) p toM< Mt O � cid a) cl O F-1 [-t ••••..• IIIIIIIIIIII Spy' uwg 011 'r '1'011404':'11,1'10111(110,11, You tube what islam is not cc: P. Richardson NARPFP6 azz) W AWN PRatE r-dAA✓/,4 VSV (2-2c ; g W2-4319 72 9.3-7 / C /AA/A 2--Na6S. D A/2421-- /N -ria--/.4S .r [ 7j an- / E72 2P6" - „?D,7,W _9D' , //711EivD /�f/72 pEST%a/', /W439 AL -c.(/ (/u4" /,�D✓'UDT )/14¢T ON ( A,(V) Y'e /3.&-2i,F/J "/ifr D.P frazioyz 1 / %l C/4TM(/ ' Ako S %1 /ALL-CIA/mg /ceAeD f /G/ETD 7771E &C4 /94 DA/ , i4 7 X// X! /-106/-1 T/i iokTrshve J EW2 , / 27X AAiev /S ©9/'//? A /Mom. 7hrIP T FAi/Atm/6141,r /fg-1 sP,A4/ V42 Gai/T 2 /E & UU/ .4/' // L. ", , E„, .. TSE, AM NJWYPJNLS// ia9,t1S APE rvf2Ate . / / F Aiwa/ //A/ /, D ?/, /S' 0/6471 7?/AR /S /e,„k-- }/d .3/ 3 i 4L 7,4Lt cAkee< ,,'tj 1'JN/2 7,-,' , „ y, ,E .CSX ,D):e9 Fe j Jz)/2,E 729. T 114o4,4/ TD /462&-i? T//,c� QU 7ious /OF ,,4 , M'1 / l)D9,U£[ N/W 2772wS (i� T— �DlTD2. Tlfc 00H2,0Nkto /N N9 ST /T/ ,2 TD yea , -ST Chis - ,u j L1i. Muslims want Islam in politics But they are divided on Hezbollah and Hamas, a poll taken in seven nations shows. MERIS LUTZ REPORTING FROM BEIRUT A majority of Muslims around the world welcome a significant role for Islam in their countries' political life, according to a new poll from. the Pew Research. Center, but have mixed feelings toward militant religious groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. According to the survey, majorities in Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan and Nigeria. would favor changing cur- rent laws to allow stoning as a punishment for adultery, hand amputation for theft and death for those who con- vert from Islam to another religion. About 85% of Paki- stani Muslims said they would support a law segre- gating men and women in the workplace. Muslims in Indonesia, Egypt, Nigeria and Jordan were amongthe most enthu- siastic, with more than three-quarters of poll re- spondents in those coun- tries reporting positive views of Islam's influence in politics: either that Islam had a large role in politics, and that was a; good thing, or that it played a small tole, and that was bad. Turkish Muslims were the most conflicted, with just more than half report- ing positive views of Islam's influence in politics. Turkey has struggled in recent years to balance a secular political system with an increasingly fervent Muslim population. Many Muslllns described a struggle In their country between fundamentalists and modernizers. Among those respondents, most tended to side with the mod- ernizers. This was especially true in Lebanon and Turkey, where 84 ° ,u and 74%, respec- tively, identified themselves as modernizers. In Egypt and Nigeria, however, more people were pulling in the other dime - Mom According to the poll, 59% in Egypt and 58% in 'Ni- geria who said there was a struggle identified with the fundamentalists. Despite an overall posi- tive view of Islam's growing role in politics, militant reli- gious groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah spurred mixed reactions. Both groups enjoyed fairly strong support in Jordan, home to many Palestinians, and Leb- anon, where Hezbollah is based. Muslim countries that do not share stn ng ties to the Palestinian cause, such as Pakistan and. Tur- key, tended to view Hezbol- lah and Hamas negatively, Al Qaeda was rejected by strong mgjorlties in every Muslim country polled ex- cept Nigeria, which gave the group a 49% approval rating. The poll was conducted April 12 to May 7 in seven countries with large Muslim populations. About 8,000 people were interviewed race to face, and the survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points for Pakistan and 4 percentage points for the other Countries. Lutz is a special correspondent. A AALLAH DALSH Reuters EGYPT: Supporters of the Islamist group Mus- lim Brotherhood protest last week on election day. l/1.4�.9?.e.4i /.J2ivF M=4: 9S/-.,QZ•2/90 - Ce72.' 9.s1•�i'1 G3519 TD. ' & '/vc%/4 fit/ /We,.7466 7W44 /Z//MA/ //4 aw' /// TW ,az-a e/z//.4/f/ 4 4GDE9 . Richardson vz577 4/ /S vhf -Ry co/x/pAE /W TNF Jrl/.04N ,4 ,y,DaD hi4e, /S/1 / 577[-7 19 AXxo /N 00'77)AM : 4 71 -le C. 4 o.,# TCD''/7?Yj z T/i`•e- l L5 / i 7,7, 2N /s /p er= P ' ?I,F• /si /s 4 R.6444/ o.� 6°P -,0w / ?e /?Ea'J4 & /' %' , .1.6•40-51.140, 'ter -at -al t/%/g-Pi .7 ,'//abli 52045P/1W ARS' / Fc 2ve/Si me64it//,r 47114( JT 1.�,�F Ooh// A -4/s rzic Jvor A, -T, -t/ -uis, //44,a/7-6- GN /77iC(/24 677;e0I ‘ . //�x. .ve,(4T/?�C. 9I/4 / v.far to4 i-(/i%'�4'l ER41./ vi. 47%?i/f ,4 /D/2 CeatfiVS Th5IT '/& T7i,�= � ia&-N .014E '/4 .4ND X t77(9,2T 7D T7f,-12.eD/W ,4 77. -S A. 4/SJ /1/4134 DP o4; ,aN6.e,F is 77/47 ATRDWS T //J.&4.5' - se T/f /AhvA,v ifE/WEY oW /6N8.e4T 777WE egVeS, 77&4JJ' - 1e)/519 ?? // T//E /AJA1,4N Anglo /A/ Mr/9-1FIRAM-MI E', l-Dz e•A #1,14 - HYD .•i --I b(/? /i!/ A1' /C/Ag ///S /1/40 RECEIVED It ?WO CITYOMANCEER'S cc: P. Richardson .0( tie -7Z-p "kt k o m o r. -i-' red a -C YYIuS( Q Vey- Sonle S) a D -r- - r).1 s -6() }--iv CJN--4 S rr -r I -r" ( )‘s•-k0.n! Jews `Le £ Ce,►�-e-�„ vcrs Cc_ i\//9) -y) 8 off' )9-1144) cinvSE vYG_eNj c� r �� l w �`e�l 1S —i yv —� _ (\ipS ve- r-- li i"' C44 -v ,\ 1ze?f' 0lir- ry+f- RECEIVED ,DEC".� ; .:: CITY P`' `AGER'S I a-4- c �3 �.�p►��' Ai►eSS ,I111111111IIlIII1I11+�N1IAI11I111I1t%I 11111 InIIIIan Dear Mr. Mayor: cc: City Clerk P. Richardson S. Nelson James E. (Jim) Horn 26404 Columbus Drive Menifee, This letter is in regard to the Temecula Mosque and the handling of this issue by the Temecula Planning Commission on Wednesday, December 1, 2010. I feel that I must condemn the actions of the Planning Commission in the strongest terms. The Commissioners' actions are reprehensible at best and reflect badly on the city of Temecula, and on the City Council members who appointed them. Each of those commissioners who laughed at and treated critics of the mosque project like lepers needs to be held accountable. The Planning Commissioners acted in contravention of the California Constitution when they violated our civil and Constitutional rights by their treatment and remarks. Comments of the Commissioners clearly indicated their bias against us as though we were incompetent to address valid Land Use concerns regarding the mosque because some of us are philosophically opposed to Islam. From the California constitution: Free exercise and enjoyment of religion without discrimination or preference are guaranteed. This liberty of conscience does not excuse acts that are licentious or inconsistent with the peace or safety of the State. The Legislature shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. A person is not incompetent to be a witness or juror because of his or her opinions on religious beliefs. Several of us came to the meeting on Wednesday, December 1st well prepared. We articulated our concerns clearly and concisely. Notwithstanding our demonstrating our legitimate concerns, it seems that it was a foregone conclusion that the Commissioners had already determined how they would vote. This is evident by the publication of Planning Commission resolution approving the mosque project prior to the meeting. Yes, their lawyer covered their a..es by jumping up and declaring that they commissioners had not yet signed off on their action, etc., etc. Obfuscation aside, obviously unnamed Commissioners were involved in a violation of the Brown Act, a law. One can only speculate that they may otherwise have been well compensated in one way or another as well, another possible violation of laws regarding graft and corruption. Our presentations were ignored, and this places a liability on the citizens of Temecula: • Anyone who traverses Temecula knows and understands that the many traffic studies conducted, and rubber stamp approvals by the commission over the years are worthless. Gridlock occurs every day. Our legitimate concerns regarding traffic circulation and safety at the mosque site have been tossed aside, leaving citizens vulnerable to unmitigated hazards. This will eventually become a liability to the City of Temecula and its taxpayers and citizens. • People spoke to the infrastructure regarding the unimproved condition of roads in the area, and this was ignored by the commissioners. Their arrogance in this regard will have a continuing adverse impact on everyone in the area. One way to mitigate this will be to open the Meadowview streets and roads to through traffic, and we/you can be assured that the Islamists will ultimately demand that this be done. • I ran out of time, but wanted assurance that no burials of human remains would occur on the property. This is a common practice at Islamic facilities. Thus this represents a potential serious health hazard to the entire community. I sincerely doubt that the commissioners had the basic understandings of Islamic practices or the common sense to raise this issue with their Islamic friends and their supporters. • A minaret is clearly intended to be used for the call to prayer. It has been so for 1388 years. That is the purpose of minarets around the world, and any protestations from the Islamist community that this will not occur is pure fantasy and you know that to be a fact. In their willful ignorance, the Commissioners thus condemned everyone within a mile or more of the mosque to eventually be inundated with very offensive high volume wailings and shrieking that will emanate from the minarets, five times per day, seven days per week. The Islamists were just following their prophet, Mohammed's guidance to use false representation (takiyya) to us Infidels to advance the cause of Islam, and the Commissioners fell for those lies. • The population density of the mosque will be far higher than what a church experiences. I pointed out that the standards used for the determination of parking was flawed, and this was ignored by the Commissioners. This dense population will present serious health hazards to those present at the mosque, and ultimately to the community because the sewage facilities have been determined by flawed data. Overflows will occur. A copy of my presentation is attached. • Denial of other churches such as the Greek Orthodox church were mentioned. • Special privileges have been granted to the mosque that have been denied to other churches. • Allowing portions of the mosque to be built on the flood plain leaves Temecula open to lawsuits that will cause taxpayers to rebuild any future damage to the place if/when it gets flooded, etc. This land use issue was turned into an apparent hate fest by Chairman Carey who turned the meeting over to Islamists and their kumbaya romantic Interfaith partners, treating us Islam -aware patriots and citizens like greasy something -or -others. Carey opened asking that speakers remain on topic, which we opponents to the structure did. After the second speaker spoke addressing deficiencies, a pro -mosque speaker went into a pro jihad diatribe that did not once mention the building or other concerns. Carey did nothing to bring this speaker back on topic, and this set the tone for the rest of the meeting. Clearly, the real topic was NOT land use, but an Islam/Interfaith community love fest. We who were concerned about the facility had been misled about the reasons for the hearing. Clearly, some are being treated as far more equal than others. Insults and slander. We have witnessed and experienced appalling hatred being spewed by Telesio; balderdash from Harter; dodging by Guerriero; Pat Kight showed his willful ignorance of the real world, Carey was absolutely biased against the citizens represented by hundreds of opponents present and about 1000 signatories of petitions (copies attached) opposing the Mosque. Does money talk in `TemeculaBell` The combined expressions of the commissioners and the 70 or so ignorant supporters of the mosque amounted to flipping their middle fingers at hundreds of opponents and about 1000 petition signatories. In this letter, I am asking that you return this issue to the Planning Commission and demand that they conduct a fair review (even a new hearing) that addresses the land use issues regarding the physical plant, flood plain, parking, traffic flow, population density, noise, environmental impact, sewage, and so forth. Do not permit people to go into rants either against Islam, or Islamists and their supporters to conduct another love -fest as opposed to speaking about the physical plant, flood plain, parking, traffic flow, population density, noise, environmental impact, sewage, and so forth. It is obvious that Mr. Carey is incapable of conducting such a hearing responsibly. I doubt that the commissioners themselves are any longer competent to judge fairly. You will need to develop a new panel who will judge this fairly and without bias. I would be honored to work with you in this. By way of credentials regarding my competence to address land use and other issues of the mosque. I have considerable experience and expertise in reviewing facilities of all types, including mosques: In 1974, I made the American Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia safe from rocket propelled grenade, rocket, and car -bomb attacks. In 1976, I made the American Embassy in Dacca, Bangladesh secure from unwarranted intruders and took several other measures to protect the American Embassy staff from terror threats. In 1976, it was proposed that I be sent to Tehran, Iran to undertake security improvements at that Embassy. My Ambassador in Dhaka halted that effort by refusing to release me for the transfer. In 1979, the Embassy in Tehran was taken over by terrorists and a 444 day hostage situation ensued. In 1980, I made significant security improvements to the American Embassy in Rangoon, Burma, making it secure from wanted intruders. In 1984-85 I was a counter terrorist project manager and made American Embassies and consulates secure from truck bombers in Algeria, Tunisia, Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Muscat and Oman, and Pakistan. A few years ago, a 1000 pound bomb was detonated alongside of the consulate in Karachi. Five people suffered minor injuries in the Consulate. Dozens were killed and hundred injured outside of the Consulate. I am certified by DHS regarding conducting threat analyses and surveying properties. A few years ago, I conducted a threat analysis of Temecula facilities and no action was taken by city officials. When I learned about the chosen site for the new Temecula City Hall, I wrote to city officials urging against this location. I pointed out that and accident or a terrorist on the I-15 just feet from the building could virtually wipe the City Hall off of the map. This, too has been ignored, and the Temecula City Hall is now one of the most vulnerable municipal buildings in America. An industry standard dating back to the 1980's that such buildings have a 100 foot setback from traffic was ignored by the Commission and Planning Department. How do you feel sitting just a few feet from a potential monster bomb, or horrific chemical/hazmat spill? Attached are one set of photocopies of petitions that have been signed by about 1000 of your constituents who live in the neighborhood of the mosque site. Thanking you for your time and attention. cc: Council Members bcc: Others not named Attachment: Planning Commission, City of Temecula, Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Planning Application Nos. PA08-0241, PA08-0242, a Development Plan and conditional Use Permit for the construction of a two-storey, 24,943 square foot Islamic Center located at the northeast corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri. I am James E. Horn. I conduct my business, do my banking, and most of my shopping in Temecula. I reside in Menifee. The criteria used for establishing parking vs. population density in the mosque is flawed and should be reconsidered as well as the environmental impact related to these factors. A church's worship area is for families to gather for services. A church has individual seating or pews with good leg space and wide aisles. A traditional church building of about 24,000 square feet has seating for about 1100 people, with space allocated for a choir and music instruments, baptistery, altar, a broad open space before the altar, etc., which takes ten percent or more of the worship or sanctuary area. Some churches have statuary which takes additional space. Using the criteria of 3 passengers per vehicle, this would call for about 366 parking spaces. (www.churchplansource.com) A mosque's worship space has no aisles, space consuming seats or pews, no choir or music instrument space, no baptistery, statuary, nor altar spaces, etc. It has a raised dais where the speaker addresses the assembled. A mosque separates attendees by gender. Only men are permitted into the worship space. Females and small children are excluded and must go elsewhere. Given this, the worship space of a 24,000 square foot mosque can accommodate 1100 or more men, with their families in other parts of the building. Given this figure, it is not unreasonable to consider that 1000 parking spaces would be needed to accommodate all of the attendees. 3) Before any plan can be considered further, a thorough, objective, and unbiased study needs to be conducted with unannounced census taking of Southern California mosques for a period of one year to determine peak periods of usage. Based on those figures an appropriate allocation of parking can then be determined. 4) Considering the above, the actual population density of the mosque at peak times could exceed that of a traditional church by 300% or more. Other project infrastructure and the area concerns need to be addressed in this regard: Water, sewage, trash, noise, traffic, and important environmental issues. Please include these comments and suggestions in your deliberations and file this with the referenced applications. I recently composed an analysis regarding those who support Islam and those who oppose Islam. I have run it by a couple of Rabbis (opposed to Islam, of course) and they think that I have nailed an answer about the two opposing factions. It is not going out onto the web. Here is your copy: SYNDROME I'm a citizen, a veteran, a patriot, and I love America and its people. I'm a Christian but do not attend church services except for funerals and weddings. I am a Zionist but enjoy bacon too much to convert to Judaism. [I have been asked if I am a closet Jew, and have been accused with profanities of being a ##$*"@# closet Jew.] I've been given the opportunity to accept Islam and rejected that completely. I've lived in Judaeo-Christian, Islamic, Buddhist, Shinto, pagan, and other cultures and have observed goodness and decency in all places. During my ten years in Islamic societies, I saw goodness too, but also saw more pure evil in action than any other places I have lived (including Pol Pot's Cambodia) during my 25 -years outside of the USA. I am an American! I find my nation divided. am a Christian! I find Christendom divided. am a Zionist! I find the house of David divided. I am Islam -Aware! Islam is the main thread of my book, Di Daw Daw Di Di. I find the world of Islam united against a divided America, a divided Christianity, and a divided house of David. A world of civilized people divided against a united foreign aggressor cannot stand. Islam is determined, while the west ignores the unpleasant truth they face. Americans, Christians, and Jews share a shameful syndrome (see below) that has only recently been identified and named because of multiple and continuing acts of jihad, both violent and subliminal, issuing from Islam over 1389 years. As Islam consumed the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula, swept across North Africa, and laid into Europe, in the eighth and ninth centuries) the Islamists became adept at dividing and conquering, and subduing - driving the conquered into despair. The conquered peoples were (and continue to be) horribly brutalized by their Islamic conquerors, and compelled to struggle to survive in their humiliating dhimmi (second class citizens with no rights under Moslem law called Sharia) roles which have (I believe) set up cultural relationship roles for centuries, and which subconsciously persist today. The alternative for the conquered was to convert to Islam and accept Allah, abandoning their faith in the one, the true God or to die horrible, tortured deaths. Many suffered ...., while others, courageous beyond belief in the face of the most onerous oppression, these generations of humbled Jews and Christians should all be considered saints for their steadfast love of God and his son, Jesus. The Islamist conquerors selected (compelled) one Infidel group in a given place as the swept onwards to be their servants pitted against the others, and vice - versa. Thus, Christians became distrustful of their neighboring Jews, and Jews could not trust their Christian neighbors. (For examples, George Soros betrayed fellow Jews and worked with the Nazis to murder his fellow Jews.) Enmity arose, and this strengthened the Moslem oppressors. Islam identifies Jews and Christians as 'people of the book' because they were born Moslems but haven't figured it out yet and haven't accepted Islam. These `people of the book' are considered apostates and apostates are doomed to death or acceptance of lower caste status in Dar -al -Islam where as subservient to their Moslem masters, they are dumped on regularly, are subjected to special taxes, including blood taxes (where some Jewish and Christian children are stolen by the Moslem masters and enslaved). In Moslem controlled Spain and other places, Jews were identified by yellow stars (oh, yes, the Nazis borrowed this from their 20th century Moslem allies) sewn into their clothing, and Christians had other identification such as special hair cuts, etc. Both were forced to wear special garb that identified their status, and long beards so their Moslem masters could grab their beards while they hit and slapped these dhimmis who were (still are) not allowed to defend themselves thus accepting their degrading humiliation. Christians and Jews are still treated this way in many countries such as Egypt, Libya, the Arabian peninsula, Iran, Pakistan, etc. Jewish and Christian women, young boys, and girls were (are) often kidnapped and taken off to be repeatedly raped, and then dumped back into their communities. This still occurs even today in places like Egypt, the Sudan, Pakistan, Indonesia, etc., and now this practice is being exercised in the shadows of Islamic cultures in England, France, Germany, Sweden, and other places in Europe, increasingly referred to as Eurabia by people who understand what is taking place. In places such as Spain during the Islamic period of dominance, the Jews were placed into positions of tax collectors and informants for their Mohammedan masters. Cleverly, the Jews took advantage of the situation and prospered better than Christians, and when the Christians took umbrage with the Jews, the Jews sought protection from the Islamists. At times the Jews took an active role in quelling Christian uprisings, and actually protected their Moslem masters, their tormenters. Christians were driven into similar roles at times. (Striving for survival the Stockholm Syndrome was at work before we ever defined it.) Over the centuries, a terrible enmity between Spain's Jews and Christians evolved and their Islamists captors/masters exploited this constantly. In the fifteenth century, the Christian King Ferdinand was able to push the Islamists (Moors) out of the Iberian peninsula, and the pogroms against Jews started, eventually driving them out of Spain and Portugal. Jews, fleeing from the vengeful Spaniards and Portuguese fled to the 'protection' of their Islamist masters and tormenters, and in turn served them well (they had little choice) as dhimmis. They are known as Sephardic or Mizrahi Jews. Other (Ashkenazi) Jews remained in Europe and did not seek 'protection' from the hated Islamists and toughed it out suffering their own tribulations amongst the Christians. Given opportunities to do otherwise, these hostage dhimmis have too often adopted their Stockholm Syndrome cloaks and have protected or defended their tormentors. Over the past ninety years as Jews from around the world migrated to their homeland (Palestine) and in 1948 created modern Israel, they have mingled and become one nation free from Islamist oppression. Most of these wonderful people treasure their liberty and freedom, and yet some still defend (Stockholm Syndrome) their former oppressors. Millions of Jews have come to, and thrive in the United States, the most tolerant nation on earth where they thrive. Half of them still behave as dhimmis, striving (Stockholm Syndrome) to protect those who would again enslave them, and seemingly begging for another holocaust, greater and more violent even than Hitler's final solution. Dismayed, I have seen this played out at a Synagogue near my home where an Imam was invited to spread his takiyya, and I was in attendance. When challenged by visiting Jews of courage, they were pounced upon by the Synagogue's Stockholm Syndrome enhanced members; one a nasty old man who viciously challenged an Israeli -American's citizenship and her right to even be in America. Both of these antagonists are Jews. Now, faced with Islamist expansion in Europe and in the United States, issues are arising and being ignored. I find that a large number of people in America are willfully ignorant (applied Stockholm Syndrome) about Islam and the societal train wreck thundering towards us. Jews like Michael Bloomberg are the worst kind of Stockholm Syndrome affected dhimmi, the kind who would shove his own mother under the proverbial bus in order to gain a few shekels and favors from his Moslem masters. Mayor Bloomberg supports the Islamist victory symbol of conquest and domination at New York's Ground Zero. He does so because he, like George Soros is in fact in bed with the Moslems with many millions invested in the Middle East. He knows that if he exhibited a shred of courage and opposed the Ground Zero Cordoba Initiative, the Islamists would cause his millions to vanish, and Bloomberg would rather wish a holocaust on us than lose a shekel. He is a living example of applied Stockholm Syndrome. In Temecula, California, growing numbers of citizens and patriots are lining up in opposition to a Grand Mosque of nearly 25,000 square feet. Some city officials (some of whom are Jews) are draining their bladders in their drawers (Stockholm Syndrome) in fear of offending the Islamists with any negative actions directed against the Grand Mosque. Certain officials of the City of Temecula are (not very discretely) supportive (Stockholm Syndrome) of the Grand Islamic (Terrorist) Center to be built in Temecula. These craven dhimmi cowards have not even been held hostage and already they are exhibiting classic signs of the Stockholm Syndrome, defending and protecting those who will be their tormentors. Eric Jones From: Patrick Richardson Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 12:15 PM To: Eric Jones Subject: FW: Can a Muslim be an Good American? For the case file. Thanks. From: margaret jones Finailto:margaret.tuscanytravel@hotmail.coml Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:13 AM To: Patrick Richardson Subject: FW: Can a Muslim be an Good American? From: joansbags@roadrunner.com To: margaret.tuscanytravel@hotmail.com Subject: Fw: Can a Muslim be an Good American? Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:39:44 -0800 I just received this from a friend and figured I would pass it along. Original Message CAN MUSLIMS BE GOOD AMERICANS? This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish and send it on to everyone. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities. Can a good Muslim be a good American? This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply: Theologically - No. Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia .. Religiously - No Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah Except Islam (Quran, 2:256) (Koran) Scripturally - No Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran. Geographically - No Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day. Socially - No Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews . 1 Politically - No Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan. Domestically - No Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34 ) Intellectually - No Because he cannot accept the American constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt. Philosophically - No Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co -exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic, Spiritually - No Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' The Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran's 99 excellent names. Therefore, after much study and deliberation.... Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. - - - They obviously cannot be both 'good' Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish it's still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand. ,,.. Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. 2 Fin1Y1u111-t to runuln LANA TOMLINS Viembers of Concerned erican Citizens respect glans freedom and are :nded by the Temecula ming Commission's ill - rmerl accusations con - ung their opposition to proposed mosque in iecula. le U.S. Constitution is highest law in the land cannot be subjugated ny other legal code. The damental claim of n's Shariah is that it is highest law in the world that all other legal es must submit to it. ariah law" is being timatized under the :r of religion. 'he First Amendment is 0014,0* FORIAL BOARD R YORK ;her californian.com 16.4315„ ext. 5403 being used : to destroy Article 6. Freedom of speech is being denied when those of us who criticize Islamic law are called bigots. There should be no preferential treatment. The Temecula Plarmixt Commission was not erly mandated by the Council to decide on proposed mosque, 11 ; members of the contents - sion and staff listened to staff and consultants pres- ent their findings on the impact of this development on parking, traffic, -;noise and safety — findin .: that ultimately resulted in California gnvlronma Quality Act negative. dedla ration. either on the ment or the impacts that were deter- 'freedom" law does not dis- mined will befully midget- criminate or give preferen- ed by the conditions of tial treatment to organize - approval. tiq s that do not meet the Considerations that fall gandelines of the CA, nor ide, the statutes in does it'Make o them other _ ,such as the uses assor empt from the ated with a mosquethat ,,C A ferent Plana unth "Itxamples of this were terefale, were riot under. - :given,. such as a Greek stood or addressed. OrtliodoX church and a 'Examples' Of these differ- Christian church that did ences.include 'the .time for I notmeet these require - prayer during rush-hour mems and were denied a traffic, liinitin% the evalua- conditional -use permit by tion of ling to, an Nun- the city. alent �,o� 00-squarerfoot; It is clear that the corn - structure, the;I l ' o"prac w, nisaloners, while listening tice of separationof men to op. people present both and women during. prayer oppose ng and supporting ent on mosque times, and interconnection of mosques from different localities, to name a few. The federal "religious LAURILOCKWOOD Editor lockwood@californian.com 951-676-4315, ext. 2622 arguments, had already made up their minds based on the deficient staff report before they ruled unani- mously in favor of the mosque. We ask that our mayor and city officials step in and lead this community to a solution that puts the appropriate controls on this proposed mosque. It is this kind of leader- ship that will ennburage and bring development to the city and give courage to other communities to stop the aggressive Islamic expansion that we see hap- pening throughout America. LANA TOMLINS is a resi- dent of Wildomar. COMMENTARY POLICY The Californian encourages readers to submit unsolicited com- mentaries for publication as a Community Forum. Submissions should total about 500 words and preference Is given to those on local' topics. No guarantees of publication are made. I `J �.l`L eak, J S oo \1 CL' E-mailed submissions are pre CalOpinion@californian.com. submissions to The Californiz lop, Temecula, CA 92590; or II� kb ''`n 0,. �. Mrs. Margaret Jones 31680 Calle Girasot Temecula CA 92591* cc: P. Richardson — OPINION/1 NCTIMES.COM/NEWS/'--,— We have spent thousands of dollars to have a nl e peace 011 ful existence. They are ing it away from us. shout" I asked to take this alady to please q ing in my ear. She said no, o thank Me d0 as long as the rest. were, she rg, Ismael was. She was not. a member r y Ismael of Concerned American y mom, Citizens. who Educate yourself on the. to help Quran and Sharia law. MARGARET JONES T,lemecula op'p team U' att Green xrrran and e Van BLIT togethe nity. We e team; aril! in each eek ars and ew essfor- our fora' the y"; thteW were a' bicycle uate the Via. Yay 30 the crafty". We will beSiaue g''ernChristmas• my deep- est thanks andlet"s all make ging a year long event BOLO t� 'le"i�C'N isaPlnt,. rpr1sed, n© Re: the Temecula mosque, issue: One had tobe. at the meeting to gat a true picture. It was obvious from the start the commissioners hadrnade their decision. They listel d,butdidd The mvsqid not hear. Ti Ue imported speakers frorri Los Ane geles and San 'Diego. jest of traffic was not addressed by thein. The traffic study was afarce• There was no talk of acci- dents on Nicholas or Calle and Girasol. My family neighbors bail people out of the concrete ditches on a regular basis. Rudeness? 'Ye up d on both sides. Thee group Concerned Am C d. aitefus was try Words Haiperson and others tags clime from edo, I did not fee'l,tliatm. The fact remains that ,surrounding home- owners are not being con- sidered. We bought a home with five acres to have some rural -residential life, as promised by the City. What is happening here? i) -- 11" r.7- Li .'"Li r I r • -i i 4.': o a co i tao 44 6 S -0 8 I g •,:,, .5 71.14 ,-, 0 . . . •,.., .... ,2 ti-cs .411 •_, i Ei g ,R-., . -5 4. 04,4_, 0 (;., n i g 'g ,.. .?- •- t . . •. R . 49., A 4„ a g galinAl _oa : () -- .5 -•-' a; o▪ r Lei 2 m °«.w`+d.- o ,, 4 1 '61 R"p'E Q «. 0 .T.,.,0.._4e8s O flfl '"'- w g co iri ..... T3 § ▪ 1.1 °' [— m - w ' — ___4_,, i .76 .i, i ,g -ti ,,,;.4; zi : -7--) -;tri � ii L E a9 go E 6 X 111 .. w , g NITY CITIZENS PETITION vs N4-4 O square foot Mosque Printed Name W E Cx ,i4 y 4- ›,tc�a0 �j / AAS,) • Eh] 1-` CSY .`fir: ir, 0 MI in d ) ,A w -4 •4 — O 6, En rh 0 cn o. b' 5 Ci0 ry T.i •:q Ell.,:, - , v U (/} ..b' V 4 Q 5L 4 'g I q w m o o 0 0 C ,_ E to E • M , �� �cli ci . '' " *r7[�' , 0 M g. Q) oy �% .. 1 'F.11t�4/� . -04 + a W ✓ , O'Q;m. Li•ECom! j "0 i.i • W d.4 W ( �0y 4 CI 1.y Gn TY CITIZENS PETITION a a w pa a.) .4 b O ,. a. u. 2 4,1 Z1) r - ,60 Po P, 7t a ar-, .6 t a} UN 0 461 0 a a, .. , , u� 0 , . ,..., .,,, .., .,.... rz. g., dg U 15 z .a Y Att E › a 'g .° a -0 woa "E ,8 =Q3 E a o v r 'fi 8 0 a :.--. g o"' CJ Sr) -1 U 0 0 2u i i 1 t , g .'A :" 1 = 'c� e... : 0.0 4a .^" a3 C E 'o 0.A w, N U O 0 a b 0 >1 4) H 0 wi 4 a] "C3i5 '. 8 t� N 8 a, N GL) v • a.. 4] ..w •. 4-4 47 o K C]" 0— vp"7 E `+ Qy r ` q r- . g O k? -r0 {V raj • ., ' -r LA 0 . 4]b; O I 4d - El 6)� �,O zv 6' . rr,�,,,,}}Gum 43 ✓`. kr) ru y 'C7 A U la' 74.6-64 8 y "' CI) . al ..,,n 'mowi b4 W E L., V w 4) Q C�,., 4 5} �y 43 O ' , ix. •S4 Cy sn � 0.1 g E Qg 0 rQj c,.., (-661 ' 01 0 y a� g a w 71...iEG , o C? 5? ".C,` 4Wy} - 4 rn VS , >R{ 0 CZ 4] dr)' 4S 4t d ,,,.,„Cf j.v; •a.. 5 ..c , C'••2 • 3 EU 4a " w 0.1 • o a 0 . C.1 4 4 6 �. O • •^+ d R ,., 0 ..0 0 '6 '^" Fa •-1 {-4 [ j Cl?CI>U Wtl ��! �" 4? u] di c�G.?� + uo 0 54Gou b m .2 0g 4.) O g "' , - Cid „I "d 0 "b 2 GA Printed Marne C/] E 0 Q e g A72 4 8 -4 g E4t Urwg 100A08" r, p ergrg •o a .13b a 5 p o U 0 . �'' -w mf.n . ' 846 P.aS E .� � ; d mModg _712 r� t 1-37 EL 8 to r E Q • E .ate tl z •k7' o 4 4) a TY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED COMM N S '"'• 4} O cr o v] ' U cK+7 t al `ar p - L C as bA . ^ d ,� .9g�, M ri < • r 4+4 t% 0 �rh 1.10 OD N E U 1 ^�. 2 0 w4 N . ch '� ,* v5 b r.-1 ' •.... 1w U11) ° nla 0 . ma 0 = 00 ti 00 0 4.1 0 _ 2 Cb) 0 0' s . r"1 .''' ;;,-, WO I" r (YI Ki yy .w y M o 0 M C 0 0 bi) z n15 . N 6 ' 0 .7d'.rfi ' ,.D '1, r, ti w p1 Pts a � O v 141 I VIto6 tl•tY 4f iO E i cr � m K � S o.26 as arcs a o 1_ a 4a G q . ,94 q -As rol•a) 0 tl) 0 1-d r5 I C1'2 ti. ocn 4. 4 t ,,, .,..,, . ›, .,„ ,,.4 . .,„,„ .,.-,.., i t-, „, Q A i .t4) 4.,o d. , •� w ] ! .-- c, 1 c, c., , c„, 7 ° 0 i \,,. :,, af- ..,..4 y +- �kd 1 * as • E 1 i 4. r -r }C 4] h1 as 1 N 4) f 1 I C" t g k' i .,,,4 .5 .,9 4 —0 3 'Ny 0 0 4 oa �' CU il 00`4a 0 a.. Y•-, , c)U c v tet a 4-. '' «8 'd "6 Q 00Sa , a), 0'0..- till .rij 0 A TY CITIZENS PETITION EI 454 8 ❑ '1: ybi) co `-. O cid �Cy V «.q Ctl d D NO «2 d" ' G" .e d" Ci) li -w 97 ' 0, .• ,may « 0 0 O :.•. ua) ,, 1' g Ela c .0 * C -0 O) od v7 0 ' - H co0 r,..1 �o az - 0 o o c'l per'Ti ol ii "I7 71 4s, e6,.:,, 3 > M Z izti aim) *a yy [� , C] il al 0 0 'al' � U '•� ;72,, � � • C3 raj � 0 L- 2 V, i s y a•1 +r 4--. N 0 E-1 U g i syi N "Cy .0a„ e 1) o a f) Cr tat,)' Ctt •� o ,tol ') w OR F+yr . � •'--1 `i..l .0 E- c) ,„• cc 2 w o ° 2-.4 •pu' cd at5' g I • c, L6:41 "tli .?: 'e 0 O 'c ••—i 11) bo 0 U a t 9 ,. . o i o CI 15 P. ' = 8 °' u g pa) R ! i § 7744 g g g c.T4 p-,. g 0 0 0 0 ' . z ,0 ,8 v2 a a •, of to ct .° • l Q E.4 g> ,moi FW Yy Jm! 0 • •rte"' Citt�C.y1 { V) 'C� .=. V dal •i,.,i Cj y 0 ,+ 0 F+ z 0 w tu c1.4 0 c.am v o co u - i .5 � *r m* '• E 0 - -4 °' 0; an ft; 4.3 618 on .74 -.4 cAmt CONCERNED C ay cr • e `� by 0 ▪ w : o +4 (1) • CD 1te) I . w .`� - a 0 a Q - u]• el) D WA 1)- 1 � ,,,,1 0.i eh � 0as ducd ;x, rh Qen 4rri -4) 4 M, 5 .2 Q by i O z ig .6, ' v 11! 0 o� b O 0.l O 02 a,"?' i'B by 40 P: ay X0 a5 . p E.__, B a.) zo cg, a) "ci d) 7P W ▪ E,9 a cl3 C.-) g 0 C'l .14 0 0 - EA al II r" 'ig-I ; ,i, AV 8 PE gPri , .11 0.0 r444 111g4 118 2 gagaA .14 g isA.4111 giagkei lloliqqa 1 '1 1-.2. m„.2., 151 i CI 11 1.Ta 49 04R I d Z $014° 0 ;I laiiht a5 Willl 1141. e IAN 04 411TI# 1 4 W z c E 8 °044 an o ii cr 8 � b 44) • d 2 En us -b •W ., o.r 03 ' 1 11 et) 9)g v 4. P0.—. 5 fil v 4.1 4 Po 0 to to P icy to "CI 'w a 0 Xi 1W CD_ pa4 41 1 er on 0 et g co °mow 0E43 Ir4 g to 494 513 0tLA13.4 ' 4, 0 0 2 0 C] g yri urrA a" vE"' -E ceiEfJE 0 nn y 4 car nn a) v� g 0.) o .' b •'" cu os fn v, tg w8orik g o ' 'ury 0 �,. may 16 b t nt a 2 a .� i -14 ITY CITIZENS PETITION co) ▪ bb 18 a 'w' �' o ▪ to s+—I , C.) SD r.] o tr. .- ''y GA ° o . a" .5 C]"' 6 75 t1- dY .40171 "'0 rn vi,' i . .. 4.64 i„ j"▪ 8.q 0 4.i 4E1 'Q 0 bU 6:8, ra ;tr. g 4,3 iz, 2 m ,,-,1 '+'41 8 6 (13 .-`e; 0 "' 1 r.p, 6.4 En 9ZI m* ,5.2 'o oi)o o OF °o Qa, Qi' 0 o a c'0 o 0 c .. c> (.) [ you ' T to o_I ,'-e. ; 'r" •g r0 ..4.1 ut i cd cd o 4.4 pp O 0 »W • u ,n) P,8 a� 2 �-1 p di 0 , 4,4 Lel :y a) E, ) c 0 o LI a g 0 8 Z 611 E 'F,hz 0 ,44• • u•5 5 Ti.4" b ..p, • aCil o 4 ih V m -I -r c �." bli 4,) Fg p =. 4▪ ) fdel cuE 9.M4 E""? ai W - -8 w n G 44 p fr1 c• � ami • cd o 1 4w 'a`1 „, "'M 8 u , d ,..›.' I ,..,,,,e, 7, ..,:d Q. ,..i. _sq., W El •Jd - rO -, 1. ,▪ `fir <''"+ 6 8Irp.I8 H•Trl- sC .2 ”aoA t) 0., , . b,%., ,N.V) 4, b (11 Si +4 ii N O d3 ., V • q j 4-, 0 L.) Q0m, `c* 0 a.. 0a) .14 4 :-. . ga i -1 3 a)• 2' —, as —,`?". '44> �; , n •a o , .10 eLA ck • fl nE N u •k U To o rt try . � u• G Q R. A trs CN a. 0 tea, F _w TY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED ED CO 0 E—, 01 Q ( M 1.4 n 0 9]'U n4 0 I 0 CA w 0 SA bi' w a �. u on n= 14-e tu FA C14o . -1 `� yw - q, ate) 4.s ''" •'C1 O ( U O ›, 9) 0.i'od t' C 0.15 t? rte. dr '''C9 OA 4.1 "'" W W Ctl o"' C r- TC •. U F"" 471 sa A 'E' c w ',,a1 L6 -q Lil .M 0 .-. ot$ • fir ,• , cu = . g Q vii vo 5 c 0 a) E C) ,GU . W b,i U F XO'-r ] 7, z sn N Ini c,3 4�y to O EL) R el t( N C «.+ .w U C EL o N sA Gam{ _ bfj F-" N .•-• tzt 0 U v C >-, Vcoq 93 0 ."M c, U a' 4) rX# 9) Ntt ., Q? er) .4,-5. 4.} q7.)v) U di ut t1S 04) Cel '4 4 0 •C °) wGA ' / 9 Ott b11 C%) "C9 C." to a E 8 E k q 6, aq� � 'w . a 2 o +J q o . 173 ❑ rn '1-.7'27. z a • Q 120 w d •-- g y ar 46, p. TY CITIZENS PETITION 0 W 0 •, U N y "' rrn ' t o Q ,4 D � o • a) a5 H _ 4-$ . �o -, -, m. = 0.1 = Cp al 2 0 'a Q. 4-e• ay , d A •VS E 4,4) 0 •4 1.1 CU -CU. .E•°?C4 0 2 b0 „ *J ski 5 rw 03 • "C� w • 4] s u • ▪ ) b cn + d.) o I>', °- - • oL) 8a�cci qv) 'id rte° ° W 41 44 ; 4A zar 'Up cn .6,E 0 •A 4' ti5I . ,74 r U o 0 CO Uc .� H 1 —1 v , 11.2 ezi Gl 4-1 ezi nn con ITY CITIZENS PETITION CZ 0 8 vi 2 N U.0 0 w ° 0- 4-1 6 "It cf o _ u c a 73 a_ °a)w g09c� w, Q 4 •� y a• t j a, o 4 E a)t o a ra 0 �,„ 0" o g, o 0:9 104) bo u� 2 c 5,3 4.1 cn- 0 w 5 a square foot Mosque eu c LiSo Go i n 3 Q •W oq 4,4 ca a o N vs i w y �' o a 0 p.,w C7'13) A a a) E o F� E ,- .r s 0 '240 (K o o W .'" c) 0 mc—�w 0,•-, i3•.w w 0 0 c o '4 0 o A o i 8-) i CU o 0 6 2 L) izsi f- c go .- g ill ,n cat u b4? 'U U.) "a7) 'cl ' d -5 0 • u� M k N U M.M. 4.4 4 � = 0-4 COMMUNITY ITY CITIZENS PETITION 44 ,;oma ' NeA a • • w C > o ai o 4 a 4)' bn ° v50 ' 4,4 - � T..) on -b0 rp '" lr? ' "" 0 'Id U C'' ' &3 • 0•r) Sl, Na ._ o o ,,, 0 ›, s° . 43 a) 12 ii"--i)a a) �'. rfl 'Ci 41 u (.4,1' 5. - "U a) w a 'b to G #• a,) - E 0 0 ❑' O ? rCG• m �CI 3(Y ' $-A MI of vi t 4? O 1:0 n y sn ,, 0 oE= ccs •• ' wi ,...-, 4J1 'C� • • a) P. a)a) A _ p v._ a• .w 6„ •_N N ( w pa M al >, 4] V 4 0 c4 al b crs :>, "0 0 "1:1 '"-- —4 0 aA 0 0 St c(5 - a) 4) , rNA Cr Nin TY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO as 1) h .. Grl >1 ▪ r ✓ cd d .0 • 06.°>; b+ r- 0 VI u) �;• ani O MI▪ N 6 vs. •c) .1.1.4 ". 5", w o E 0 :' ••••`%% Z • 2 • .5 - gi w En 41) O• ,W-,"d ►t cn 75 Q • • P4 04 • 0 2"o 0 0 Ga 01 71V 8 o .9 .., ti, ,,,, -,,, w 11 0 0 Ina 8. y y 'I) 0 .,. - .,i" 0 • p - SV 74 os a,4° F- 0.r v] N w ch0"dL'-° • ml 0 Oh • '-09; &N 0 col 0 C-% r • Li • ED CON1INILNITY CITIZENS PETITION ;n ax Em 76 8a n o vp0 N • as cu. 'r c6 .a▪ q V � 4 ▪ 75 • .,▪ .,▪ } ID• 44tl. tr. „• 2 n • 5 co cam., co• co 0 `° . 7 l gi on -‹ p,, ch., m • • QQ.) o c.-; u m to o S.3 rd.]0 ▪ d3• :El .tr 'C c* eH. Q p,5u {4 G .—. ▪ ' -cmc ,, O a3 19 ZS CI - ci 6 w 0 g 0 o ' • ri°'Er' ,40 ) Ego ci0— E a r • 0 + - " u 0 '� 2 pz 43 CJ -g (V1 ✓ . ►r7 M TA Z- 344 4 vIZt ? :w k to � O ti w. tti a • .• co - c"' a D COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION 44 0 of its citizens. o 0 I�q N "i o c� (3 o 1 o • 7- 0,0 =; �, • r. cs el) ii ca c c . rrt=QC" ca 5.5..)7. • ., o 4) • - 4) 43 Iw 6} Q ,40 ttt �-, t\o dJ flag4 '' c Q a7.:;'-‘ 0 t as rn sc En . .c_ O ...4.M ms cn 1:4 O b4 w 1,1 Q w OttU u5 '"'ailD LI a 71-1tt�� Vi . , o 0 1a, Cla N 'C7 U:?4 < O 0= O O o m0 00 C N _ s~ E .61° 03c a . 0 0 V 0 0 PI o a ". w I l ami + Si a v V 0 � ".0 o CZ U o O 49. 0 w ' a 0-1' Id 4 '20 Crl� � u Od 6'41 qy • 4, CA. " O TY CITIES PETITION CONCERNED CO a) " ' OD 7 .0 g )O 4 a •_. 0., . A -.--'. 1 02 _ tri .5 -, ,,, o. ei 'ani (j Lel E 6 "Cy v5 wy Q 1+ `o-, °* En O z 8*"� ax a E o g '5 •U a� , d - - c*yw (1, a... En 0 ,_., .5 Mt o.i Q f...i = o 0a w �, 4) =,.a O 8 O'5 cr ' 8 a.'tea .� fd� ▪ •--,. , ami r7 • ,.-u � " 8 & as • .. , ,..- 0 1,„m as•„ • ^' 4.) • - 4” 0 y "U 0 -'0 O Q ) U g i 12 Printed Name 4.1 • O u 2 • O • w • L 8 tai g E s rn vE m o 2 ti a 0 FO ✓ tE'il 6i) ,4o a a oCI • aid 8tr 0 E a. o 92 645 o .5 w - u N g"o 5 �,y b I'U CA 0 '41 '73 0 g u -0,74 .� . 5 • N Cul c ,..., LI 'b Q m • • ,. o o ...4 Q= as pE4-_=..,... N ... 4+ rQ °a, 8 4� E. 0 •- v `Cy rzt so 0 43 Cr1 •, iCS 7 gg am' " ; ; .L,„0 �r °' -0 -4j ° 2 co41 p +..o z G} g ,.r Y o i, i,a v 2 E .cid . -e v u to �`�0� a. •. ,w w a .0 g' - •rh$a) Printed Name ENS PETITION CONCERNED CO H 4 0 0 US 0 0 raj VI 0 The circula TY CITIZENS PETITION 9. E bb as • -r5 cr -s • 0 7 qip S u q C _ a) g Q G `b "d th W U ~ 7 6 Q0.4 a'5 `+"a. ~ ▪ m 0 C 4 A• ' 1 � 0. 4,, °' m FIS ` • U 3 2a (u b S' 8 c> U ` ms .. a ,.7., G a 0 at • 'ma°.$. P " coy" - 2 .i 00, • o v H v 0w 71v u,U o w m egeg . v' 1'`6 -2 H 2 1 Tile circu1ati TY CITIZENS PETIT'IO 0g f • 'P' EA 4tau t-° an V• '6 rci WI 0 L' ° 03 el T4 T4 a) .F.,.4 -., ▪ P, . g Atib 0 4 . to tri rn�, 0 — -t3 .. °' .E .°'fix 0 to U • 5 Lo 0 ,, cl --. ,S •y.ate, a) 8 0 } �▪ 0 4-. •-•1 6-1 0 U `*r 0 j B ?_izi ° 74 , ID .ci i w 0 ' T--, •,.., N CJ bil . • c ',I, yt�JJi cR ▪ .7 E 75 — r 2, J-_ si a N ▪ `51 g i — 2 v 1) z tuaxsur49PS11:iniiirmoopmamioa-RuAJA .1.9SZ613011.1111 Aim p9 :41)110d 0111,Alua 0J,MOug'ib -WILUSPPMrin J10/40 00ringinfa3 ZAP IpLf.JFMY fitki Olp .17p!IR PaP410"1 040 PMILUVra 0n2 Ifl1.i4DJlf popinOda 404,4140AI p11L7 nompd nobi aleqjyrin:up od 01 -V- Lclg-e61 it14004111 :311171SONI0)-i frJtZIOVI91101IYW g1-5170)15.49Cil oreera vra /r) eve) oi?r, 1(;1 glta EsaIPPV ,VM-u-Nsia9oci9 Cid L A • en/ fr V:. y ,..„„.115s °cErgN PPJ ilapUap!ftilt-to nava Al!Ap2au pinom WLp wowdoloAop rfolito kuu IG LltrawdopAap s!trtZOJl!Ultnd asa pnwiiico g.tri Amp ginagmaj, JO SID at(' asin. RI2ILOSIS *PA 0111,10 AIHRIII3 (9 I" l'I°1-13DdliulcrauLlauupuo (5 Nonss! Suppud (tr !!!!)!Wai)) agpm tur!!!!!110(1 ag!ou (z fARps puru an (1 :Ii!!!!)itraai sariss! ffu!(1nIgit! NWO!claicl snolaumu mod kt!!!agj pa1iOtio11 spill P1paulaazaa /Craft aro `simillra inap.p2p11112q) At 'Wood !ICI W (In plupWil!igeme !!!At 3IIC sanu P5IFITIiq5 1211123 allot !MC 0111550/A: Wei aanbs 000‘5t Er 1! Sagplu. mu, Tginlotuoi, u! ptoa rroioo!N uo 1;1(3N oozit alp pouutryd 2upti 4!!!oBj U. 5! 212/11. .eam !qq1 ”q131111! WEI! $2PNr5 mom! Sum all !OMNI! glahlitagutpt wafaid sprintaq inoqu #111001.142 2AULI 2Atlq bi `um)!-!!ppV is'!" X'11!" -I 9111. VR•i• T tmo 101)10FKu 041 Jo 4H1±01notn ow pogo Ion op toms! Lupo pug oulowmd Vupind 'uop54uoo oujen aspu oqIcumigUa g! 'Fratep!,..*4 glaulru!plo JO 42p02 45.7k OTA PIT ammo pintol.;!a aqi, •sua250 315 ju, 0.11!)!2M.U1Y Alajus aIp .10j Muutqpio puv sQ.P*D 00.118 30KIJII2 Affig!"4041•13.1 524 ITM'Slio31 JO [ALL NOLLI.trati SKIZIJID A11611UNIA103 aaktunmop -"Vrtir,9 t 1.1 ,1 UNITY CITIZENS PETITION its citizens. The O 0 pr 0 - -zzi 0et 613 • 75 w ^'" 0 V) 1 a) moQ6 0 w p ▪ } o • r, w C a as 0a) Q 4t g O a� 0 M t Or a o ) En • En r U 1 fal Ota 0 $ 0 • 0 0 E 0 a) az eat a) 0 square foot Mosque a) 0tr) cu 0 iI O N g a OD 0 0 0 a) 0 0 a) En 0 0 y 'm U COla1-4 1) 0 • 'CS 'e1 CCI Fri .8 g CJ 6 w • r.> Oh` r b1 'w bb eel CrS 120 I) rcs a., NITY CITIZENS PETTTION a.' a) �° to -0 bt 6, cr - M ro C H 5"ZIP o ..a ° -a c (, •- a - I-1 _g CE) :A.., a O j p :x, g 3) • eq n a4,,O ai w o w 8'?? 0 o - • - -c, xi a) vt w-' b....1.q,w - •4 . • ; o t u 2 g.° sa. ,0 747 o1'o a • "' a) p 0 'o 7) ig 4.1 . 4) S = E g i 0 ' o Q .— b «a L) ,ie • ,.p - e.E, ' , 0 m 0 • L) , o U.`1) -8 m N c g a) a94 cci WO R N {. .may 0 2 z .- �j • 0 „,„,O WP sn U q) 6 G) ..i Q cu ,4 v, K.) CrS 5 a 4'' g 14 14 a) a) ` a) fi. 'Cf 0 "Cl 0 gip -6153$ Royal CITIZENS PETITION U Vf cr ,10 ti 0Q nPel0" ai -0 40'o 0 3 °`( 1 u ' -; f 69'6 i t,69 �� 4-4 o C4 0 1 Jam. N. id N 47 N N O \ (./ 1 6.'- -. - -- f t'0�ti 0_o. th j -R i 4 ‘I't)1 1.... co °. a) 1 aea) i - f U n22 (ill 0 QI 1� al -0 6'b a Z' < I 7a 0 D 7 N O j [} ,r5 U qq avW4 "U 0 1) - "0 i :SMI .g =1;' '-'-'-.4"' i 1.16 w '8 ep ' v.raj �i 4J D 4.+ N sI ti ' '='m b4:4 [—a NITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED C g . 'E..2 00.)may 0, nn�, w "' e A7 o • W O MI ay -p 0 g O ,ryY o ,€ 41,4 O C1 ?} O O uy � sv ay -�' yy 5 W O 0 o v Nmr. N ( U O E ,,5, - • o ? p f's ty O '..�'} 4M 4} y Vi ra n ere w'. , U �. O P.+ 0 N is ctiU yam' 'C cc��4.4 o*'n ivy},z 2 d) 'q '~ f*1 (ry C7 60 V ". .1 6' 4] .72 Scd O ay . ar ;ui ea ;' C7 Eo on 'Cy g �••� 0 G • Crj atVe — Printed Name C) Y CITIZENS PETITION N :.--4 nQ .. . .., s7.. as O p - Cl..) . 1) 73 } o =' MI ?w O , 1"'+ 4-1 ~ 0 (1) al • 0 •w rt w OF 4, St 0 GO a u '- p 0 w 0 � 0 0 0 6 , _ H '67);.., 0 0 7, 72,,9 0,J W 0 0 '5 V CNS .3 1 co 8 15 p CJ_a,•-1 ;.- -s 0 ies that inhabit square foot Mosque rts ;•"1 • a-1 •u E2 4:i 0 0 ca m4-14,1 0• ok 0 o bn • W 0 0 0 •0 g T 0} cci 0.1cdt n4 u Er EW " a) C34ZA' 17) 4l 44 COO -E .,, ..J " ..., o U an s° 0 0 8 0 CrS cfs 0 0 0 0 rai.,0 J3, 5 •0 0 A . CI 0 o 0 LI0U ami 0 O 0 ,� ,ro• .'0'0 yr 0 i. --6T 0 ?_-.,-, e+ ^� c3 a l m 1174 =° 0 b h 0 S cc; Printed Name -7f;j, 9 I' UNITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO tn � .,.a v ay v, ai N 5 2 0 m' co N to ;24 , 0 .$ . "-'i} o � «i '.,J Q 0 tr.,) u; w E o ...41 c•,) • N ! .. - ' ,20 , u ,...,, - :-.... . ,...,.4 . •-. 0 a c 0 w o0a .� r-, g° V) N ''.•;.° CCf o 44 al CIA q8 C' E ^Ca criU 0 H a) ry "S a] C'.. O cam,] ,-, ',5 [moi i 43 C1 O ;ZI },y• E s Vl S.<y ix. ,) 0 ,.- O 6 g el) cn ? a) en 0 o trs g -7,7. (4) c‘ ct 4 -4 ITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO g o 4.9 124N nn 0 T0 U ) c2 0)U o d4 ver y_ w •,,t a q A U pp'n 'L7 U i [NTi r/ w - 5qq.� o .w., G Pi led yr «`i j D -,9c"„j .5.._,'?:-.':',,, cuiz D d) n q .� wct •, w wry •,•,.� . 3 .2 GLi 0 'Y to 4 2, - g . 0 v 4 v 0 N. _ 3 ii 0 i o' p rax ,„ 5 • a "o�� P. g 0 'ryU ,--1 -0�``'� 8 q)y1 rw .. {..Yr c] Y•+ iq ,b j ',:f4' Qy "8 E" 4? -4 g (cl 4C O ,cdr4r, =) o E- a I cw 0 ^es (1) = `4.. :c.: g b g 'a) i 4 -z:' IA v , L) 5 l w S CD CONCERNED CO O1 ER1R CD COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETIT ON vy o`6'gc'„u t)14ai mi 4, .> to egb-CC prt,, 0 . ' Mr i , r,gu 471 .2 ct P". i'si...g a 0 ,_ = M V '4} i s/5 0 0 cii Om 6 la, ,E .'ter m "tzl PI w , .5 --Iu i sndy] O —c4 0 ..o • -, O °a , 2p• fel. H Z1 d ao. 0 qs8 ` Gt 9, - 8 u o >, g O ,,, t 1 c7 H C1 :ii Mo a A7 Pi O -.M z va� 0 b..0� .•.� = w .42 a� v Vi n N t-. cis ami , ,14 ...) E .; 0 0 0.7 >'.. r`}'t 'CJ C7z _ca 'Ci - Q by Gi mow + a) v, C A 17,1 E � •a tt L. o Ct - 0 X � o � q I/7 cb (Li � o •4) M w Vbc m 11 PQ o cia E 1ITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO o z4 INC, u"o 4• M a a} t. •W P 11 • 0-1',,{ U Ca Cil N • ^ FF b 414 -CI 0 al 15. 2 ' ;114 2cci rt%) 2 8 z S 1114 El f 4, ani +i Ill • ""' —i -o 0 Ch • • .w ••i. o F4 0 w) o o c...5nt v "• O . ..4:-.70,,cin = ,..1 :41. cz 'CI '4? 5 d) z C wW y� •k „.' '- , LAITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO • E 1) gra an) "'4-. ' v 5t '0 16 v "SI • 'f) 11-1 8 al •x,• 00 - c ob • - a Y O iD. ✓ ? i7.4 r y0.y1 qj '-'4 Sg g▪ i-I ▪ 1 iL as a bW. w 1 El / -w W O o'Cfrl . 'a�- , `2` 6 .. ▪ +� .W ids W5 {} D EA z 0 , 64 13. 78 74 ° ▪ " ▪ 0er, • ! 0 U F y 4Y O 0 a)(1)e fai >a)( a a 4- ) o � o - C 4-4 •6 0 V ...1 •W i CONCERNED CO O 1) 48 •W CL4 (1) 001 b�'s 5 g a) tt o 1 PI Q.5 sr t4 '.0-'4 a 4 0 , rix 2 713 7_,,;1cid o -0 g V.ra M ,cc 0 cl) VI al c: ag, 0,84 .. I c,1 0 0 V,vim, :''' 3 ,-',, 4 i ,2 If 0 5 az - tR ,P a} 0 ° o _ p 0 C o (3 .4 Q,1 0-,•0 .4 CSU H^ "slitc876j.gfi ; cd r}::$: c u g- d] a> 1 cn to I L.).4.4, wg 1 1 .02-.! .....4. i ! MI 9 ) o-^ 64 g ;=''' C13 w r Printed Na m a o • O F • • 1 kt I t173". • a i cy ar COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION z of its citizens. 9E" , 47 'St M 0 • r ,--1 0 1) 3 r% 0 to W cid 413 W � 0 —,.„ .2 p 61)42, u. 66 r . ' ›,E- o o 0 WE .0 U N 661) •0 ° U`� $4) L) .-eliD ;12 h. p, ° ^� r om. O p, �O 9 merr C7 4,? CKi CU 0 ! cIl0 En • w 4 M CCf , „a CU CI) 18 ..Eru 'cljr.) i 1 g A g 4 c�a73 two ' ^ ED ( °' = W -,1 -. -0 4 , 0fY+ 4 w C7 C} N U Mg + 0 4) 4 ~ _ V cq cd ct) +--I v (21 Printed Name rtJ E 774, 13 i o g 90Z1 C .. CA O W � J •) n) 0 tr m O � G a.. u z 0 ra.w0 O y` •� p m � N a � rL, CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION -v 13u 0 u etw � •- 1 cd 4,43 OA • 0 0 . w num square foot Mosque 4 a Imo oas '� l'orri ai +0 -�• c �„ o . o N a) 2 a) (LI 1.1 44 5'E .g 4.4 • mt a) d. C G) 0 v rcl t O 4.44.5 to . a) 1214 ,n 0 r cu 181 r_° ` ° ,' o a t_T.VQ0 Q .14 i ckr O ts zap 13 ti rr Vl a CS o Ozri • Ls g :i4 2 s , c) TY CITIZENS PETITION 0 a1 w el PO Q a> q) v ti ;.V °o ao an E or d5 a a �, 75 A 1 'b O '1=j U t� cel U Vcej� p 41 "Ci S51 M .(I 0.11 440. g 0 46 O R) , t G e-' 4 cis 9) O 8 1741:1 C 'd E ct- E"( 24 co et! "Cy W c a.. c)� ' 51,84 4g 2 ,.M.L a4 g° 7,-. co o ca c U 'd , a) E u CA M a1 E o � .4 0 0 ?, a-, ,.m-, L) 2 en , r3" 4 0 N ;+ cl 0cn a 0.10 q)cii t vi ' s O 0} ci O N p E N c.,CE, r � 0.3 ) .) ,„ WI C1 z 4) 4) w E_, 6 d) 41 '0 N ..1 c D b • ' ' nn .. ._ 0 r 4.1 —c, e cA FL,' U W a u Ci Le). t 1.34 ,7tt .75 Ca11 z �C '=moo v � N en ccl ,64 NITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CD! g g a0 0 .2 0 on d d]wo 0 "7 b a a 0 tit. bo cm 4 M m cr0 '° 0" ca co.. a.. 6 2 a En 44 g 20 V/.� ECS 0 8 ,- 2d uviE 7, .,� ° O . (1y w V}0 'C] • 61 . d = 2 44 ^ice, 0 rz4 ,, e -0-: s 0 'C' '.4 7t. ri.9 q1 CCl C3 O '5 ') -E 9 UU tC 0 " "fl std 0 g . s 47 sn 9} rw p = O 84.a 'CI Cs1 U U 9 8 M 'c'U ,Lt;' '') 4 kO g 4] ,� ttY °; i'•2ca 43 y� GA 4] 8 C _ 8 C/] 4.,m ) 6 p 572, 4 4:Azi (-2 'V) ?„0 q 0 4-. dl04� F�»� -0 110 }}terr itx c.2„, r c,7Q _„0 11\ UNITY CITIZENS PETITION rzi SiS g.6 E 4) 4? o Q r o -- o c . CI• o 45 ..... E 0›, •Eg6 ,,,, u rA c'C' Z/7 rt 0•b U •1 -- -•' ° o d 3 0 , w• - a) Q a) t•••1ani = a) d a L° ° E E c,_ a> cn cn o �--� 'd 4.3 • ••-, �,., _ {C '•2• w {� c 0 Sal 4] Q te, s4 cS o . a 0, - 1 n � as o� 4 ;. V Q Q .= 0 ..i,- - z c�CJ +-. cv 7,-, 0 o a3 0 i - w i a, W a rel r`1 0 037a�1 1,1 MI W Gid T ' Sh •c 4) 0 '.5 aA 071, 0oE y3 CZ 7'b 3 ° 4.1 °a) r g 0cam.,, 0 1) 'iI (4 0,136i, w 2 -rye Ci c74 ca mt Cr of its citizens. d 0.0 C/) Printed Name ITY CITIZENS PETITION r air H a' m w 0 N na ay «-, 2 '— o un IA arl era tcl 1-4 v o v-;.•- s V citN it; y" R1 c 0 ra g a> 4 . V to 0 ›} oi — W N pqi 0 y O W v4l V tet C^ 4--' ca 1.1-. A ,,,,1 * rk c� CJ .z - = H c. 4, ,n ai th + 0 ...� .' I_ a a„0 ,7 C.7 trs .n 74 tt't c "3 I 'l 0o to $-- pct a 4,i di di C� 4) D ' E . c. Cry vs � 3� t ar 22 c*y 7 . � ! . f . ,It -5 ,ia; •W 2 = 17- o ^•.' air G os 0 D ,2 C 0 o 0C n1 Ti tP.4 2 '•P .-& -== g - 4% °':. 'G .0 C —0 m on A l o o IA d) # u) 4-4 • l.. • fid, ▪ > N ..... asa . °•, f .0 ° Ta v ;,s O ;, , • ." 414 ' ° 1 a? • ,d a2 .x m a9 WPI 0 0Q} • c` ,, an fir. a , • °G 0 a MI0"1.wPC 0 Ii (-1 'B 7▪ 8: v' --(5 ° C 0 s o U cl ° czi ' a.) O -�3 03 4] • O i• " ..+ da} R ._.+ N , a 4,° . °0 O ▪ • 2 45 ti-IA tz N , Chi 6b /-'"114-1 H i ar„ "i & '� N ° m O 2„ FA :R tt 2 4? m ars a .� 0 r-- , NITY CITIZENS PETITION .ca ray 'a y 0 '66 v50 O ca 4 bbl VI ' •- U) G.1 • �. vat O t] �y O d0 2 Cl + ,- 4..7. &) E r' COY id 5 '•"w • M 8 Qom 5 u 124 2 69 = ›ThE-4 sU m E I'Gf 0 - go 1.1 8 o ti; co z0 v, 6v8.E o 61 0 ,-9 ; a u g O q�t°.b� 0 [x. "cl `3 c' 6 °' '1 g s a 2 8.- vv�� •.M 4A .. C1 SO -, z 0.1 U 43 4", " at C? fi• 41 c. "d , a o ,% '-' 2 .F: .0-'n ;44' 1.., .-1 c -i (,) mai , a•, bpi) ,--w a) cn w a.) 73 a x y u `. V R a ti 2 E :§ 41 4"• h. d •4 0 a u • u o • N 1 0 TU aw o b � g • fir ,ITJNITY CITIZENS P TITIO CONCERNED CO f oh v : o48 tea° biz •° 0 . 0 6 ca 04 m °'' 5 0. 2 0 t24My 4' bE 'o au o 'a' g ..,._., • . , ,-.4 Pic, .1"4i (1) g no .mss , . ; X; a 1 g 0 — c a ▪ an o '64-"' -y; .7_, p z— 1 A 4-1 P a a 0 .. , ,, . ., -as ,..... ,,, 0 . Ili L)0 a m ° 4uii 4'g 7'4'0 pari tZ S 4`" ig-c8 .5 0 a) c yam., 4.)+ N g q8 0 • .i"'1,4)At1 b. of .--� 4 a P T1 Nt rt gao 0 g g N • 000 as o • o C• � t E re, 75 czt Ea c macu. nci „, 4° .y t 4-i re2 g 61"0 •° u , 3=1. Ers tri to 0 Q o ., ,E � Cr) "C',1 M ay .4 Eh 40 ] ,- v n oo c) °' m • w t� aaA 2• c e a azi v a� on ani , ,. ,� : 0 'fory' a) 2.4 o ice. .,- 0 in 4'.:▪ , II L'I .4 -35 075 a6 • 'TZS Ci t COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION E NCD p) Pn ri. ,0 .� - b4 g0 td ++ 2, ''‘us:65¢ 8 t a, ` - `. q3 01:1p 5 O 0 , ifl y eIn :=4- A7 •�•� [.1 ai t ' O vow u O r,, ay ° as �. I x cd a) o 5 c, A ,--i 'l F' -t • .A .N c4 0 0 bA s O 4, alar`° 0 005 a. E 715 4 I� •++ a NN O fi, a) tIi47 . w 0 Cr1 O X 0 g0A _ o - v ..0 7,W 0. .0 tri o= ` u•- •4, rp 6 A) rw ,2dS ' U a 4--' .Li 74 e7.) y SCS CCS ,- v7 -01 Printed Name N. 1 \D 0 k' 0 V,\ ;; :. -- C67 --f a ') r''' S i , e. ,-, t , \\). - ) , U { .. ')k. t O' .J- '-", -,. .,j 4-y E go CFI c7. k ar 1) O 1 3:z N b � w 4 Q py f„j bb 0 e t ao 0a, w mi 0 6 a A' .fi g E4, „ ,..; . g , g "a W 44 P. -S`" 6,a 2 l t...2 ,44 4 1 z: 1 g ,-- iffi ID 05 . .3.0 6_ •'1 § c) °cr.'moo p•r' i VD 1 Izr. gli E . a 'g _'8P481 a a = '71 FA "-;_ ti -,3, Lc)) r,q rbA r CONCERNED CO D COAD,1U1%,llTY CITIZENS PETITION .4 E0 Q1 ch _t ••- er�rp Wy il V o m '5 g ,itVI C�:i...5 mo ] - *.r C ▪ .... fill Cr) raj A •..,p 4) "' cti Ri ;.6 4� � ay p �—, q) 6 N "d H �p+ ., _ o c/ as t}, O co cri 4°I rcn o M .5 •L' G o 5i an l :n HoVo5 cn lal -CI ▪ o4 u o El -•p 5 u, 43 .1,g,6" �Li)' ) ,... 0 . • {a m u) au may, ,,,., ,, O Pet ti a� O 173 6a 6 A 4 O o � 4 : Q • • 4 ENS PETITION S { ▪ bnv 4•-cv O ..fr 0' u • ch 0 • "2 ed t 0 „.9 0 } w '"" 0 B ID 6-.i .5a .w dy Uo 19 En 4.0 P O 44 0 • ". . • a 0 +'m0— o.) co .E-°,fg o •;: c.) {1.4 rzi, E4 rg 1:::1 "il MI dri 0 a 7, ,,, i,.,, "CY � P c9 ' 3.4 0 .17j 01 2 H. W 4.1 4) O a id A 4,1 ,"5, 8V 1'55' .., C'3 '' .2 0 o ai 0 .0 . rn A ,r, -..„U 11 0 0 u7 CwIwi 4a "T:1 V .1 . 0 S t 43 43 1 411t0)0- .i — ▪ i 0 • -0• X000 0 ^01 a --- ENS PETITION 4 0 tio ct 11 VZI C_7 .2 o o U O 0 0 w 4 3 ca.., 1 A' • 0 9 rcs r c0 A[ 0 U ry 0.i .41-": ... C d CZ)0 5 1 01100 ,r7 r‘i ' CIS •- .1' '0 o t V c} � Ei Ei E ;+^I ,fn it 01)0 8 0 -c112 140 9, 1) ; ' . J 0 -..-5.- -,..., ,,d 3,-tz$ •z„,,w 6g0 VI , chi �} "Ci 4) g ,� Q N TV V ii'2) :r, +Q cn "C) 0 R. F g4) 7' n3 b A 0, CU t. 4 t ti..) 't a) aS 41 t<4 Vig r- M1/4 r7 2 J Q oo r sd 0 • 0 tv EJj o; a tLL n "V3 tzu a O' 60 'Fs Q rttz Pzk e a � U3 CY, CS Z'xs .Z3 A PETITION V) .- VI ❑ Q a) '1 -ri ENS PETITION PA L) N • baa, cfa ril hho 0 IQ n . o Q • rM a M , ' `0. ` f Mt U cv vi •. tz" r a ai 2 ci 42' ami' F v . N 9] w. 0 i Pi T3 n .`"- 7,20 .Qa0 to U CO F,)4 +-1 . ai 0 C) O + i-Qo u • ▪ Q.,a6, , bp- ot5°>'r ) r'2 g ? EL) `"bh E N ) _ ▪ 2 v.i% V 0a} 0 Q c„., bl] ''- yj 1 j 04 C] t" hl y" r ty 1 O .6,, E .. • N 4? 30 as ai ai ami ▪ 8 mt �n�, CA g till ca 4 cs Nu.' 1 �. �' 4,.o - , E-+ cl cl ° un o — . ,., 0 Sq . ,. O +.. gr, C a 0 a 0 Z •:.. 0 n'v tP r 2 00 a 0 E mwi' 8 -8 rig 1 .1,:i.';'... 2 ;(1.4 —.:43CL4 4 ...,g -50p, o �r,,y` ' 0 • ,-•py q) 1x1 ti")•- , y..y dj c v0 'E •• i..1 •'M 4 i U h ❑ 4.1 d.) .0 rzi q) y .1 r•It CACA F cid U g 4A y0 0 0 e 43( () N 3 E TY CITIZENS PETITION 0 z ch N t,0 u> L. on a ' 4-4 a0 tar) ri '"o a o 72 a rariti y O ,-7 cwt., 4) d 4 i )1 E a) cug 0 0 641" 'o o 41 *J 0 .2 — 4-. .. CA q.-- . °ao 3 4 WI 41 U ' ' Y a) E a]Wl. �pp 4--i ,-. Q - — 0w�w U t....-, :;,�"' _ fir o =" .tom' b!� ^' T 1 r . '+- mrcs N b aico cis 4/2 ay TY CITIZENS S P TI'..SDN 0 V .) E ii, ) , H at yy ❑, tN1111 hi b4 4) ; 1-+ ❑ 1:: > p td 44-'4 CSS• m . 00 1° Q 5 S3 , - U d •V ❑ d. JR1E a `" , 1r; „❑ ) ccO en o ' 'TA - ' '-U a0 0 , 2 g E ,zr en N n a 0 o 0,. r 0U ,carry W f ° " 0 as 6 0 as •> , as in R '.3 P.-, «a to E .tY• c+� - t.r as Q 4,-. hi) q a) . c. 'i °N 0. yi Sraa,� _ bA'oi C.y N •r' A w+ u ,r -.i 4-4 cn 4J .Z tb is W g 0 8. vs +- La bA flfl Hg fo g r--- P. NITY CITIZENS PETITION 0 �, as F-•76 8613 Q) 41� ° , a N 0• 4 1 o. a~ 0_' , �'CD U 'L7 alk v g -t,°{4 ra'V 8 ca gay r .L •0 o I „..)-r4 ,..i.,4 r-. a, _8 i .:.;.), 0) c 14.4 01-4 ›, „,.r . E I v, { O ,_. us q O 1 (0 moi."' Si 1 Z g u — V-, +a o -g En i ,to V 1.ti (....r›, vi ! ••0r — cq a> w 0 b b S 1 I 1 - an ' 0 rt i &E i 114-.4 1111 4.4 "1::J F.1 • q) 4 — i Z.' w) 11 N rtsk �7 m � v• 773 ru 0 k z r z V O 0 ; .s g gra 5 s-5 - 'r ` D w 0 • as N O 9] w EP w car } (j a m."' ! '''' 2' 8 6 '21 .2 t g i 4 pi., cn, ,.} 0,.m+, " .5 vii Q i 3 e !...so: 11 1•.„! - 8 Q. 4�r c� 0 - 0U .,aM 0 ELY -0 U ..1,.. 4 12 d Q g - C O N cd g vi .,, i is o E ` 'i 5 E" 5 ' a p, 2 — 42 4 4 o .. 0L L .1 yam, o H -p ,0 • V g li g W iii P Z N k;). N cJ C m r l N 3 f P CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION N co 0 0 0 ib 0 a j "44cd - ..-i 0 0 `200 C.I...4 . ;;." N • cal . `c ted N En 0 03 O 'g _ . (I) vii p "-' "r a) C14 0 °' " U •� 6 4) a 15 4v v op ,q= C]p [ncrj i GoO z O a •"mss o n '>. chi a .,.... •Til 1 ai Q l ... 0 0 0 5 0 ty cwt a a) p -E a.15.? -"':(5:«,:t sF b ctl r 4a w.. '.. oN.w •v.. eq ""f 13' 0 0 f ' 0 G -.i 0 'C3 a3 .... C v. 0 0 a 7 vs b!7 ca � ' - ` a crs 1-�• la •U o -Pe S� rw vl N k 4-1 q ; 2 0 ,-2 i ° 15 t.4,.( › i ...,Q._0 a) 2 I Cr' C CO .-t, W e ; c?lin q erg 2 a • 2a}4 " T3 . i g 2 E o., ``7 1 • 0 . m a 'd• .5•°';a:$ an16 ,F"�0 ti • C'} O gi U ° ti tO ° 4,,4_,1cv' d V0 ›,./..t.,,,..„ .., .5 .„9 -, 1-.., G} g. z• v m .5 F qg 4] 8 O a , '-8° - t- `'.v alitnra-i a h rx Ed) 1� Co 0 9 ENS PETITION bh gt a. • on cM D.0 a, 241 = • J g '' c -0 Z 1/40 6 on -b f' •sq N e_ g " o pc a v 0 VS 0 IMA 4-4 rj t4.4 4'i ka 1-1 6* `0 } st3 b 0.Y a no • y1• .Q .2 C4 E 'Do 40 0 •. - o .. 0 w 5. 5.''' w le .4 ci) EA a18 c u -" 01 ^ ) Q o ▪ a.0+''^ a g. >-02 W 8 '_ C44_ qj s- '14 2. an a) L,q t • O 6. B ¢a t. 2 4. oy 'a)ty N C3 E k.i u' vii «- 0 = ` a] Q e •4 ; •4 .2 a) b o.4 ip wt.ono ahrzpvi,p9/4 boo* ,f/ 72/Vi 1/ 0110/ "Pr I 4,/ 61;7 Nn -bo 1,1412 v1;-1(r_qc. Nay ,9 CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION 0 a2 N zt 8 .7, + •,. > 8 a, o CA 0 q' [r m _ Q m -'_ Q o ig = V 111 CQ [meq 'M er4'yam... 4. .x? 0 a -0 4d E C10. k, •' 0 — .:=-..L" cci 1'1' . . 65 C9 co .r...._9 .92 c p 0 0 w w ' E'-' [fit s o Q [� o C_j ' k• 4. 'Cs . ,Thrlt 3:0 v a, 03 w.LD va o E,, c.. - as G' En y"' ix 0 0 — CUM rt"' 44`„' V R. O d ) ' 80 :-- -- a0 In ' 5.0 t 5rc�3�� am } = b] Ga 8 6 m ti.A C o 7 ¢)CII En .w 0.1 V1 C0 En U CI 76 a.? "C 0 72 • U c� � co in 43 rn 4 10 1(A T k tXJ IT w r/^ Printed Name IES PETITION A 0 N bq Nf E= P . i .i1/1 ,.t" :1g8 • b 5g Iv t 1 A... Cy "n pl. 751 P vi a) 75 c o 6:„ 194 5' Wim' ,-'12-4 2 o 8') r. ero O '0 C U •5 r 1g:6 6 F. ci sem, 42 ri5 .0 g g A2 t 11 vH- cNr • \k ,k7 6 o � O 1..1 • 0 0 0 • o g • .01 b O • - o Yom` N • 0 0 p 1.4 rzl w • b Q o E r .5 . g 0 0 0 cz, • • 6 ai • ett 2 0 0 0.11 c*`r 4 h t • t P • +01c'd g 0a G) • p o 8 � g o gbo Ir qfi 0.0 Cay to 0 � ami ami • o 0 k's. 7, 4) S 40 0 7 4 g CIS' E ' 0 t 0 cis tit 5 , } 0'.' \\'- cl.' '-'-(1: J 7I J v. 2 v E kritc TY CITIZENS PETITION 4 V) o O vr t'41 02 t +r o —6 1 g 4—t o 48 134 cm sc •.. p c a� O i ` ,LI K, en o . As a) 2 a) CO 0 a] 0 — "8 . - r.g t4 ax Cid Z:Wil"29 b a ,. r 1 l' N —1(A 4 I miV.Dt' Y CITIZENS PETITION 0 U W — pi i) r~ bf1 r WWW C: .,,,g �/ •raw 550 0 '0 2, i 55 ! rVVF'"fJ� `55"11 1:44 o w <C W I, - 4 214 . . 4 1. 2,u E . . . ,..., 43 0 '""�_jviCa 0 - -ad •.w o c.) 4 0 LA la, 24: ' -.3,t «8 r14 Cl? .O ›-..-s4 +-+ r '6 q} r., O .0 0.1 a c..) C U . Q -. 00 co.g V, q y 2" 6" E rq 0 11 "o .8 A C� �.a a A u � z09 1--"u ,— g .?:,1 ' Printed Name UNITY CITIZENS PETITION 0 L) 6 a� 2 a0 0 )v cr to A 71 .P4 o Qsa4 4-4 g .6 VA � « .5 - . i 0 "W , v1 c r -Y "d ..,n .t) ' «e f t 4-.bA rnm8 ;P b .0 t C5 4 V ' Al a 4-4 U U co 5 z "8 toCtz c 0 t c t Ei t t. 4 c) S7 .414Li ti N7 -644 icy' Ot r g O 8 -cg's °i GNU :F g 3) 1 N a Pgt in • 1-4 4} .per 4s � -w 47: O � TNITY CITIZENS PETITION isH Ye -d 0 En .4 Ec gas vi 2c o • F cn w 77. CD •�3 o 4; . A g ( y c (----1t,5'ui7 "C g " a al 5.61 'E4 4-. a, c# < ¢, 4c•-)iEn4 A o o 8H w vy{o.4-'.m 040 a td Oa, -a. Et% col (A 0 ,- y 41 .4 .5 .,' P4 a bo o "' cis .[�' c w O O c9 ool;2 , ca Q j o .,, v 6 0 ,_,r4 0U ;may .1 �, C] uy cn 6 Fai ri` •2 ' ai t o=, a) 7 • cl a) •" un 4-1 v cu„ ; g v w v -Q ci' ,�' va as o m • h cod ..?-4. `6g E Y CITIZENS PETITION 0 a t4.4.4! 1!, E • . z os} ?: s V '�1 tsU O ,r? . h ' 7:1 u . - _+ri 8 0 0 .0iri 0 r/j —. til474 rr� ; ASCI 41 . dit rn •{j Hrte ri g a E' O MEI' R,t1 Pse'l gi g 6-u .5 .1) s •na ttl Cf. - i ; q ,,,Ei ',,,k -i .P 4r1' 6•-z. •* 0 o `_ E ' ,, z r 8cQU : A cn c' p 4' D.T 0 cri . 1 • 401 1hrA N r`�ux g 4 =S B ct ,�. 8'3 o Qren ci 8) g 4'2 wi 7:4':-.q,.._, wv O t� cncn a, w -4.-. 0 E ,„, ' i t"0 ai 4 0.7 r...75...w r, 0 0 tl•7 } CS)0 idI - �„ t(4 HI„?.4.11 , F, Q 1) o E- 00- En 0 m ,id- '^' c P. nzi •., >. i . +, 0e',&I87 �' o0 o — i 0 0 C,) 0 '' c� a c `*o › m ani uo O A ci O vw ;r, V g R, N m,2' W c,8• aF q 0 = a 5 - 0 'p mI C.7 y �4,3y ti) al 8 0 4 .4,-..,.c! vi E, ti.) 4S CA Ch -1 4% t ry" sgi P . C./) 4.7 0 O gcu I.) b w y t: lo yyVo to oi.) 11.1 > N . . . - tJ] t. en C•1 0 p. 10 .5 lei) gz tcd P 'd °w 6 p ct' -0 • i.4 O -Ex a 0 .5 , =_,, `3 0q H Wig! w -g r, 2 �•W 4 SG Y { q) • O g. * .9. 'Z7 o 0 2 c 4W I3 rh 0 to 0 c)a' 1-9 4> bA via. d 8 vl 8 g-8 .6i -'Z' t *Z N Or D 0 , _ v, rJ 0 cn bp f qJ 'r—, - x;0.'14 i Q 111 g 4639 4 L. 1014 ■ ti. Nit 444 k 4 '1 1 • 4.4 C Cri 4 r- • "11 4 fh y ENS PETITION 0 ▪ w nn 14 0 1314 9? A. gEri . b V .b kr, N 6 a w 2' "- e • UL (i ; "' g 0 .5r - et o $v0� ! CJ '„, . .5 el co ug, a &m I .- ., )i 3 ' $ 0-9 gl -dF log o t. g g ; $6 , -g A 11 .2 • c u o :dq 1)4 m`I& MI 0" g . EIS PETITION rzt0 ilbo 12) li 4-4 bb IS a M I P 0 '4,! W cp .2 ID c) "El' ;� o Cdp c C4—t rn g o ', .5. -9, o t O pzi4 a v0 ,3 '§' g t:' Pi -2 § rgb _N 0 A ch 0 C• p N w '� O ' o e .3 N ,0-0 .._ ,,,,„„ , , 0 ,.. cr . cr.-,..' U 71 a rizi u O txt uas •• vi • A 4-1 V3 . 0 9.3' ii) g k w On -- ci, v c ,9CI r:m t. C. a 0 o5)° 2 eft LJ -77 COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION U O U ch ▪ N Nto 0 to O 0 '' o t onc.u N.0,0-4 1 ›v3, o ID v' 5,,a3 0 3 n}0Cri •anti) N g 9u8cd PWS ,.. • 1 • Hi=', ' If. th-i Cory En Z3 0— ' 0 r -"`O O ur, m Ec$ P E rn w 7r _ 0 , o az • �. E , • a 0b al P •ar 0 "v : O Vi 00.4 c - •U rn Ct U SC �c�ca� Ln ami w • V i., g -_, ri5 2 44, CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION o 'E3 0 t ., 9 - crS an' . Cr Pa C Q 0 -a a 0 5 CA CI) .b 5 761 O �� r c�i E 4.1 L. (j r • , uy 94 4) ..,, r",^, .. as ,....i p ., "U, 2 0 - 0 o, 0 1, r 0 o ,-. - 4- -, . Eh u L4 0 ,92 ei 0 ;r, csd ta vi a) ;5 1. til v o L. — r f .., 43 a) ,,, , t Q p? co b!) V ; U Ta 4.• � 0 0 0 • V 0y '1� DSI] «S� ,^b o -o a •M n . =a. 't5 Ci 4 g7 U z • o � -w ti LL w m z a � • COMMUNITY Y CITIZENS PETITION rh ' a) r' " 1(17 7610. 4 .N °�'�o a 0 4-a ° .:fit N°9 V0 OD .0 cf tfi 4) c) n, •.0 ` c;' cg. gt)a to e0- .. p 0.) 't7..)' c o . ax e•A 've O A ..., H N ,,„ cg 49, VH , � � i f,3 o a" GL, a� 4TH o > M 0 m v i-. �a 0 - •- til w 41 ,/,.,9] 0 4A0 6 of u a} �, ' caca M ,__, w g Cd g °. ter VI r al O ria C) o s` ›, 8 2 `,- -F cd R. f• .00l a)8 "'2 iv �,.r _ _ U col alp cd o ''' ` o ° *6 a 14 v 42 CI) 0..-443) ' cR H • r$ g Pt wa 2 ENS PETITION CONCERNED CO fl v o ai , of) ai 't J 0,) . GU -o'er S 0 Qa €wig • oo Q try s_) 0 1 K4 cci p § en- ,1 v, -es .5 .2 r4 a 2 c o En c.) e 2 ,9, 2/J' i -_ .2 P, Q 5 ro i o E .s on z Q y... •--+ e' g . „, L „ma 0 U .Q rg .gU} a) gl 8 ., › 70 ,n rn d.. U "' Q N N !,:',LA 8 0 af]•- ; N o 5 g 0 Cd 0 0 tam Itit ,v 'C4 ti rtt r- m 0 TY CITIZENS PE CONCEI ED CO 0 gbfl 0 06 w CV' �', N 0 a 4_,0 vim, t, ou 4,4 '-‘- i . M Aa-waP 0 , p ,. . g 1 i 550 a "E g :4"! i .1 c.,-,-:, :,:c-.). ,..,013‘ g'..-,, o aJ m p,-•+ -q • al) i ,?:,.., I. _de Q. Q. oQ o En I) eco �':s(5 c 0 0 u 6 R -fr 0 u ti ' •0 1 8,1 N ., • -. •ice ,, N + iS 0 0 v .4 u a) w ..° 0 CI "n i gr)., TY CITIZENS PETITION 0a ay A c ,E d as H, w10 a07 ID ,= Ho 6o: O, ai O �.W .5'5," ; o ci spay • g 0 t 0c tri 4) t4 a Pk 4> 41 2 a) teIL' t aim' 6 c.) a� g COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION uo Z 8 t cizt 0 r.-.! to g 'al I ti -4 v C3 a'^0 a in i ' ceS • .. Cx p f c; G-1 el Yw O + 7 'WM En I O § U . ' w' , o Pi e' cin (54 o ah. Di 2,4J.-- c,„ ~ 12 W `3 05.7'x°' 00 q a 8 t4., Fl 8 V o rf,g o —1 .. 9.V II1u gb H1i..Li l 0 en e8 4 TS .2" :Ill '-' l''',.., c--1 g g'3 tc4 6 't14 0 0.} . 4 Com] ro bA cu E Iza CITIZENS PETITION .p pi) v ., 4-4 -6 ;;" N •.", O . E 6-' , o E n '..fir . -' 4 N O r+�" o • a, -, ( ID O ▪ w • 6 i non a 5 �-, . -Qin' cg, • f �•- ,-� -d •,- c,..) .8[..., ,..a.) rii9., —0 SI' El 1 ..c, cd . O 7.; I to ',2;. : 1'4 "--. 12L4 gfl v o o• »� • a� In.7,,,4) t) 0 o .- 0 U i ,. V C*1 -0 cJ a) Cir. Q) g 0 en u5 . ` ,' Gam) fn cd g 5 i) 0 49a 5 v • b Vis. Pi N CCS I m 4i a to W k 414 • t3 z q5 m`l a .ate ▪ 14.142 • b � m CONCERNED C 0 H 0 DA . . . i , O O A ? d"' • S R. kri ra., 8' Q—} "' O 4 o w bo o ,..,, E i o .cy c/5 o ,r -Id •_ CD.F,.5. 0 . ) o ° 6 2 0= E ° o • o E c:i ) L) U cn .,c) y.M",- c. ", P°cr ;,.ate°.' v V, aq v E • u•hlil;Pl-g .01 U r b ti' co o ° I O 0 0 0 Agag +z -8 curo il 0i 0 a)• csF1' aucg id 0'2,il 4- •4 as '€� e ▪ ;\ ci 4R CTS g +-1 60 f ,r1,4 i JNITY CITIZENS PETITION r=1 Cid0 6 p o l R' Z l a ai D 4▪ , ' al cw M .. -C on n ms o :r, .5 g i' °' z Q 0.'.C13 cti nno r & Q 4w ch 5 ,4)O " 0 ch I-4 in 11' O '30•° r�-.0 •x„71_141'ccwr-o 0 as — -e g 4] 'iii AN ' . 0 on O a a , qy � as - N+, b ❑ N : .moi '51-iQ •-@ .5 tip z "U 65 4.4 E .�' I) 5p LH a .4,a o ,-0 o �, ';gam g E Q f1 • k. - 7IN - 14) E • A � s CONCERNED CO r c. ✓( . Al c.—�r yY k,f) 3 cr ' . —Th., 1 kr "TM eij • m Yr, rizt, U • E▪ l) a NS PETITION U ri V .., 3 ir) ,.4.4 Z. i t, I.,?), 4-4 o7 • r.Mt Q3 g V A c 'c.) ,„ 4.3 1 5 c °" ro 9• 4 ' .1 '5 ° . ° 4 .18 a Awa 8 8, 2 8 ,Q' V N 0,- u r, 0 ▪ p q:,: a? 0 0 . g. o Ja `' • 0 4- 0C can ,. 0 'e •rte^, tz ... n co . dy .61 o -58 A ! 8 4-.'(7, a 6 8 '70, . • : TIT CITIZENS PETITION 7 cu bh cu P. ° °OD ; :o 4o o .-, nsa °p.to , hii c.J " CN v; -cl e .;.. R. 4. i • oc onu)'6„, §. A a .... 8 6 g?) uX 0 m 8.- d.4 p v 4-1 5'8a) 0 . a, 6 �} 0 . m q = 0 ,o�_ % av cci o �+ 0 'rK 'p �' q �6 171 . '^-1 6 iVY CIA r'1 ..,,., I N ' C.) ( 4 :4,1 4-i _i "C'3 c4.9m' 41 E'' g q} c y?' •a a 0 t F, • a to V2Ltd O ay Cr e'" Eh fes, ve- .' °0,,c wt, i :' gbncl Ur 71173 g.5fl r 3 . ' ao V, ciP d � la c- s- CCl �+ 1:0 � 0.)5 qj 2 a 5Ta a0 '-0 u ' . -4 . En O En 4 —4 ,ma • —1"0. .5 •2J�4 0 rp?j y o 4? '.E 0.y O -, O o�. p 0C. ''_.r 4 1 Ei-ti g `', E„ 6' d]a] d} ' ci n g f.) ' N V —I by '0 . r--.. .r t. ( `m }' ..0 ,E 0 O O F� � 04 cri 0 ' 4Aj C) 0 ••.:4 .22 .. 2 LA ??J) t. ig w 'pi MS 0 - 1 -711 0/3 0 bq 0 cA a? cn d a„s as 0 ▪ g a tr▪ . csa) 4 0 ▪ 91 1 cd '5 S H .8 co 1 o a o - i .g.g in 0 o 5qt rn KZ hz •0 10 O '4 O d) 0 a m CCS Q) cd dR .5 O a 6 , O • V)c� w . g o 1 0 p w- ' "C9 5 8 awe tab en 0 8 L-1 .5 O P. fg I* q4 B m m It 4 1 N k 14.4 113. r F•. r'? AD 6 44 a 0 CI -4 ri I V,--i t vn ' - El " E Z E. E14] Qc < ' g0 11 El Pk .6, 0 ,_, O 1 e dM 41 no v] o• — 4. o ana g a) 2 r q cI " 8 v O r. 0c' --+0 0 .' t-,cen 8 0.r a� C13 Dn 1=1 2 4 0 .4= r &I..0 ii O 0 i.. 5) v. g _ , P ,•, .' ad 6 ..° tI' "ami: '41 t °' ° 4.� cu O ..2E ~ bg Efa j Q �. ..r<7mss 0 .Cr J 7. l'-`-\ l''',.. ;•::ti c A ." ',) Ji , , 1g..) ir' , 0 0 , A f, (.4.: C-' r-- 0- a)= 0 4, o o G4 i ❑ bA o.' g24od ,, .5, ❑ 5.4 r ,c • ` oa 0.1 E`000 Cin 'O . ' L oo v ❑ o .-CM3 c 91 * 'rn o € !::3" 2 ; • ) W .0 -pu 0 0 0 0 g o � 6 0 C) o T u-, o co w '4 as -r p ' .)oni t, ' M —,I) P cd 4) 1 N -61 Eta /74Z 0 : .4 L, e/) 0 0 u al 1N6 t6\c. co kri i n. , i I 1 i t sy tit • y� 2 eoe P e!] TY CITIZENS PETITION • p • a, o bp — 0 • 0 4 g .4t3 ki "O vi •M a) 0 .,� .a; tri Q d} d) 0- a ands . P a c J as „� ba c cr, co ca v 5 ril cd 50 ai . 4v: _ N a o 13) adi 4 P Et ' mi 0 60 ❑ O cCf � di ▪ r o— b . — s.,, ri 0 0 IIHI g o 0 . — b u U 8 a, 20 ° ay it IR n Yd a .5 413 .5 • 0 u cb a.) , ar a ...,, ' a) C7 '""` w 0% C`1 C) 5 ,,,, p.,Q I: 4-.0-.)..,4 • ani •- ril u + • g - OD FW 0 4-1 V 0 .. 8 uo0 g a g z,5 4_, ..0 p T o i t gij 4-s Zy v p 74 V � 0 nzi BiQ :a -g .+ vii 5, b1;1491I _. ,,,, , cl.) g, 6 g -8 'iE o m 00 1.14! ;'tea, 1 rn Fi 2 a 0Pr v cd u .5 .v.), o F"' TY CITIZENS PETITION C V 0 61 E N 5 ,..., . › i .4 .Oki ' 2 0 os 4D' 411 ° a " 2 ,„ O ',g ct c4-6( Ee3 0 E A 71; :1! 11 ' a a ` ••-* 0 • '-.-- o c) A g • it p. 2.4 U7 Q "iCI : 'f! • 2 o• , ."3 o _ E . a " o +1- c' 0 • 4 Si 0 cl a • E 4) 12 } , 0 • . , ER bQ 03y r--, .,• , E P,21-5 .ai 0 O - V VII 5,g ' rid © • ,Z ›, • '4 • 0 9C1 .'.40 • r�'n 0 \ 1,1 2 • ,S* )-42'<. 4 .-,„ kA vi ' . t '\'-- ‘4. M .49 1\41 \.1Q I VN a� N '5 Nrii ..)4 a/ } 4 6 a� E . an 8 0- N nn" vv. L.% ' a 4_, 0 ...- P1 -Vito 0 :11') 0 '0 4 i>, ,` .5 L4 g V 0cis Q1"c Ti'on ci) .5f '4+ ¢'GJ AW Nor Ea "`" a d. o "U rn 4- 1 ---.Qty . W - g O on t5 s.. 0 O V Ww Cy • UV ❑ � `Vq UUp ��❑yy W 'r'µ r'Y N G� . 0 0 Cr . g >1, a 0 Li r*� 0 ay �y C.> .� CRS €y fo o Ln VI yam. •C1 0 ` "Cy :.0 7,1'. , g i — V, 1 tLI Ctig a1 73.C `CS ❑ ,2 O Liz 1 w q O � Zr I N Qa - .h31 N +� '" 4 --.(4. 0 „ G o o t o - a 5 ay 2 a Qy "8 E -@ ..., ..,c, _ la, 4.... 4 pA 44 it I ed o,4>o 0 , r Ni . pc j b .4'4- . VI .5 '"" U ag -g- 04otntotz In U `6 1 2 p. la, :. a" o M y O 7:' yG N "El . b 4- P, m o 6.as w cz P 4 0ra 0 csa a k ;5. f Trk H ten 4. •7Q 411. 2 :a 3 w °) t 7 05 u ' 0 - g.g. 4. L) a0 ,c¢ c, 4 . G} CCI N • U O G]1" Yr = 2 . -, a Ci � a] H .cn ij o'c� .,' (lC_j C) UjHIt;H p ' ago ;�•,G PI O 2 0.- a - 0 a.r t 4 N u • .13) .C+ 'C7 CD Q hL O CD UDot0 d? 0 1 0 e.,....tv ' 74 N dU b b4 0 .4' PI cct •0) "5 Zcrl 0•"• may iii rs, 0 W 0 0 dpi 0 H SL+ Cis -, „ . `kol 0e;..., 0 r..4 Crl •5 0 Y*w y to � • ',C� 0 .- -- w °) ami u • 7 ▪ Z `' 8 • �" rp m 0 ,..w - .,,., M 7 "4 o .9, p4 0 cyr, bU 8 '° ' r sw u • :.-, o a CI) ), 8 c) 0 ' _ _ O • 0 Gam) ��" 8 0 'Ci 8 g• = "?., 44 8 ,ti -2..„ pb,.._,,:lp, -, 0 23,;, ,.., • Trf C64 C.) ' +,, O '0 ' -0 "Cf c ?-, '54 g g --- ✓ t- a a ta ▪ 4r d ti. O d ' o .13 :w 7 Z1 1.4d V zN t4 cg i .414? S u *Z > q 14. was ,y.II Ct 0 .z o -0U p • P ',g ..Y• j CC�Cjr En 0 ua 'nC p b4 0 0 b ;5 ' ces 02A.,,:.„86gIE ....._) nU° ,� vt E- KP tr.0 E a> :g .�, 1 � � t� mow'{ � i 3 111" to• 1 c);a81010,2, i w '° Hi SIJ A o cwte- a ` o z U U — ,,-, 0 g 4 g. i ��yy1 W 'd 4.1 .49"t Ti., 085 �n .w •5 c./ 2 , 4w ▪ �� P.-, ' c6, ttt CV Fag "RC1 0 c'*1 ; ° ani 11.11 p C] b.- 15 cn�y sn 0 — "�y .-, "a ,s 4 hti O • vj tol C/) -2 LA Q 8o'-�U 8 • 2� U c, • R. FJ % e37 c, 'A p tti 73 Q 4 D - j t"40 0 ..o a Su ❑ •a • L., • C.4 Cj 0 b4 co O ' 4 6 2 F ri)'g g - t i/] = r N. f C 40 i . = mac){ 4,' 1 .. A i ,,, -.0 r6 VI A , 40 tl, 1 1 1 \''' ...o.j.i I, i4 N, VA '..217A V6' -44 •A1 , ,,,, ,' - _..,... ,„,k,„ , .,.... ,,ii,„, ...,., _,.. ,, , a., 8n a U. 4.' 0 CI NI a s per' u; a 1� { El 4% •" w � 04 E'I 4'4-; 4 P -'a a cli z8[ 1E 8 ci, a,1 � ,� o 4 on ..'E rp y ..1 s., . +9i 1:4 o w—y o ch E & o a_ot -au '0. ay° a ›-, wOCa ig °� c4 4j --, o b O , c': P Q ❑ � '° 45 '= ,---• . , Da g .0 u a✓ do o E _ r=u 4) - ,oF� WV � ` 4r 2 &) ccaa�40.36.°7 0 it, ._ .,4 C1 N is V 0 o C ' co a 4i Tia 8 a a ,„ 5.3 o a a Nat owl 4 - it, � p pen v- X 0 41 404 C4 144 nil .4416 Lt. al '5`� o tp • D `t'7 ..= c E 0 * 4.1 • o = CAD 4SCa CONCERNED COMMUNITY ITY CITIZENS PETITION O TA " Q -44 3,4 4 a) Q U d] • O�,y y • , ? • (1.) Q U M! r q ,,,,, O •5 d. g I O03r‘i 46 r ▪ ,� M r: u p 1.1 er2 0 Q., C Vtit 4.• °i al V) �a o MI • P o 4i 2 .- - .. D ' -c0 - 8 uO 2'�,c•"'F4r a td]O C„) . 5 w • u5 r C �- 0 en 421 'CJ toV 'el W .-' V u, qi O O 4 i . .00 V g o " --',c° L .• t• d.'3 0 15 4 ar t ti '• 2 IL a 6 ti, w 14-1 ^0 H •' ..0 ° n,o 5 '^' •,moi 4 ►, 44w t+l.} a] H 6- g o N cr Q t 1t3 42 5 y Ca ;672 (....J ezt .-173 'r d Q ' 1,1 �.0 rid Printed Name A4 I» 0 V\ i TY CITIZENS PETITION «)i bb 1,)w j4,4 ta ED {T, ›, . ,,,...4 _ , b,f, . N ' I :7, .2° -c:c% ,,,,,s, :g cr -p. ....., . ..... ,... . r. o_' a '5go c c cv r4 �-0 E. �- yi . - C]. cd i -i • p W k] N 47 'o z boo cde n} v°, ani • .--c ch 1:13 g 19.E .54� p 00 re) r C,.sn. . G 1 0rte! 1,..11 ›-J.-1 "' 8 , , . ,, t D . iP f 6: ,... 0 Z - ui r. O 14 0 3 ? cn ., 0cu ni• • Yom+ G� W W U V �' cr C] �za 01, 71.75 bu o fly c, 0 ., O a' V 4w o -a 0o cvl O y .� ar 0 E 5 -1 4 Printed Name 6P2 - ED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION a) E cg big PO SI 6P. N 0 ' 0 0 CA `k wGO Qj 4-4 a)' ca 7, M a) ' ,.`) Q 'd via "" n� E It a)00 *, 0 4) 4-, -0 0 r v, 0 0, 0 8 Ckl 4 - Cr) 0 i ri) El) ELI D. •a 7.3 Qw 4)V>0 p hIH`: .b .., — cn 0 a) �s 4) :t-, ..a, , `w rn G .i rig " cri _ r re) CO ...Y,` cb 0 en 0 m 0 en 1n 0 ..G 74 V N ". ?o 0 Uis 2 Pw a) o ° : ,. E .2 -0 d) v, 0 cm - , 0 0 - u ' rn -0 0 4) 4) q 0 1 0 ate)' 1 .1...•g >, s-. > fn 0 .1...• 4? "Ci vl 4) m -0 vi - U a) 0 bA L." A a) ice, �"• a1 .4:4 043>.,cha ,.. '0 O ~ 0 .,_, „,. c w „ t) S -0 0 ---•-•.t.,00" •n7 3-. IS 4] � VW Printed Name CITIZENS PETITION aWo 75 'I • a) 't5, ,,,,, N t i ,..., r,„ sr 4c'' X81 500 od -�• .4 _ " 0"4.-t -64 v! 1 g u 1 Og g'. ,.`"'.h' -0 51 -5 . -°,11 ...,1 ,__," 1 dg 'j ' `r c.o.?2 0 Q ,--i ,z) ...., 2 v ,itpl., cd 0 CI 0 ;..4 0 ° 04 y'a 8 as Q., 0 t R4 0 N o �Q . E a w 0 0 Opri o 4#.8 .2 p � g 8 2 :6: p &iJ v :15 p., A . 0 aazz p,g 00,443 b►] 2 o :x El A c� 5 0.0 0 -' .i ,� G} IFS N � to 0 42 z 4 1 a -5 , A 05a C.)8ili '8'• a ��yy rd -ti r.o Q7 2 g O'48 O+ n4. ° a cin, a,, 54 pTh C3 N t�1 C> al r 0 C� b 1] , q -, 0 4-4 " p. 0 t �•Q '5 2 a B ", o ... E -.0, ' ' E N 0 tnc)0 e it 1HM T2 . - h. ga' CITIZENS PETITION ] p ,., n, N .5 > bb 0 b p„ V cw 71 of)W ice.+ L" "- 4 O o acd N w 7 v3ra) 0 .0 , q7.1 h + q Ckr, d) iv 0 ta •-4- t '12 ''-) .4 fq °' Z. c.,,,a? ft si _ C ) :. . a 8 a , a j ...a. { U 1 I r Ilai 0 c..) -? TA .-,..,1 g 4 i rg 0 @ „,,,',,i E i ' c t8 7., . , ga i 0 G.? V , g ' c : 09 4 8 ''" '1';? tn c1.4 Cd A 4' 'p 0 p ++ fuq A aa 5 t 0, U o ) +1.) 4--, 0 E z O L) 0 C.) vi • 2 0 0 O � on => ▪ En • iop Ca g q) 0 � er T▪ r; 0.0 ? Cx 0 • "0 0 - y▪ 0 in o ins w g ea g -a E •_ "75 .= S" • 0 = • 0 C • try a) N 00,F2 {� SCI„ 0 -,.pa-).. o o ›.,..s4w o .74 v ,4—, N v5 • . 0N .. Ste} Q 0 'yam, ,-- 2 0 U 2 2 2 rn v,Gam.+ rti 0 0 0 d] 1 64. ° °'1 to O a.2= .go U p. Nj 2 -w m . g ~ 6 e. E } th ci u , 8 8 8 -175 a z 3 ,q rt131.4 Y a.0 5 Y CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO 0,3 cc . N n, nn O c.,.., . ›. N .'14 0 .., .5 csi' . ti cin oEn 'it aED U .0 ? . 0 ' 2 '„ °'j fLIL #'. {• bpi} 1-11 i) , ., o ani ' 'av Cid 0 E , v, U 6 V] 0,.-' y...• .) •, .°� 2 °' n}} o E Dov °8 _, v u,. 0 i ,—, 0 • En 0 0 , rj;4-i Ci} 0 w "0 O a ar sn .M • pw U '"' Q� a� N CHS., fa) 'C1 ami 0 o - cti i fi ' i —c31- 0 ED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION 0 L) bli Cr vi°Q o O 0 0 o a) � fl t> 1'4)ti-,r1i CI "0 ° ..o 0- - o iii • d 2 o ( a '� =uy 7• 80 X ▪ . ,W 9 .). y a4,1 ' E▪ n • ' CI, . an "• ,. ^12 a • .� Crs o ° , .b CD 73. a] C] 4)=. a ?; aA c o 0 . 1-1 -� as cim ▪ �" ▪ 1 �°- o 1.,o I. .17S 1 N 0 b1 co = - V ., ▪ U K" a"` a N 0.1 • CF. —• �� U 4w mt O ,+ ` . 0.7 "� O C� q .5 •.w as = >, 1/2 k ,,4 a t•f y a 173 � s v lzt -vs 4,7 ,261 C3 • �� CS 4, o " L) ^S▪ „, 4- o TY CITIZENS PETITION 0 U..trj 0a~o a. 0 LY] 9] '"' E oC 0 v dopc .1 v u o Wit•- E t-. , 0 16 ,_, M CI O VuE .,, U Ste , f. a> _ ..0y•..,7,.. c4 — .,,c O 0 - 'as 'C1 .0 0 O U 0 g as 0 'O t:1.- • –. CA C 43 tA 0,4wcti L -'m-«-, ch 0 6 0 2 ! i !" • O —1 0 '0 ,64 Ml P M't, 'Lini in 41 O L • C., 5iw 4, E 0 t r -'�..• cu ra. ai ' of o r g 4}rn ay -ar g o 20 i O H', ' 'v o z a] «, . c •P 0 Cil p v, 21 a) a . , 5 ro O A o W 4-4a) P c o° a) g4-, ar.) ir-r "Cq) PIC) ''' 8 Q ° o 68, '74.4r; d c U rag rrr •b 43 c. �l r a) O dA q,1 ' ,7,-,r,) fl, Q • N c ii g *- a) r—, HI!1 •-• U v c..1 : a) 0 2 ..-. g ,,, •—. a> 1 Cts TY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO 6 qty .L., -.,r f rel 0 ,--+ -ct • - H q) . - 4.-F. N .2 Q) 211 'rd (13 k 0 0 N I 1. r ti t Li 411 v C7 11) cy e-' 5 CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION "ar o ) w Ocil Nlar) 0 .: W = 0 s c° 0 ca, j Nw 03 as 0 . . o i'....::0 0 CI GY, F 1. Q" fA 0 ,,,,,, :-.4 *^ S, -i r w0 E "'fl Chi a ,� • 0 Q 6.) 0CO 0 0 yy iw` , 0 0 1.-4: M v 1— , U Oi 0.4 0 ) A:w�1cb.co t.d) ('"" ict Vc' * ` U Vi Mt C O .2 B 6 0 4. oAr-, Lo (Z), oP as il.� 0 t e, ata) ; ', -0 0 't - - 0 ."' ' 63 "0 ••a L. c. 2 FA. - .65 V tta v 6- 6 tvji 1 � (-V3-7- • 4 G =47 tiQC3 1 CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION H 'n .,, ,ti apo w o ii-, •w,- moi .4-. — . .y d7 V] > ▪ s1] Q "1 "C7 ...A 'd • . °) Ali O 1 aU 0 U� ` c. a,) .2 -� >, E C 0 „ ▪ an)25' Cc) VI moo- E o 23 CA. r t o • ."}y ❑ " Fr M G.1 7;-. CCS ifltn gu4-. n C5 ;�._ tea} 4 u w0 1:1 Q a) E ' ` 5 0 ! Sfi 4} r4`i r1] � r'-, .—� v. 0 .O 6 •'s1] N c) N W r1] 4) "0LH C/3 Fn LE ct u g N .. M4 s Hyo10 ~0 4) ,r . • u] ED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION of its citizens. The bb Ls• 164 82tMEA ?..du 1flJay .bz ca 0 rer 4 0 • . .5 • v d 6 O zz O_ ren a 0 0 E 02 ;> v, U 8 C] �} w w . w Q « dJ 4 E'er' k.� E r_Ao A _p ▪ 0 • a• mi U r9'124 "51 cd ' _ O .171 ✓ 0 th- c2 4A d 'al • trs 0 '' 0'51 0 C) (rS" rfiy� r w 2 ' ren �• my E" '" in 4a -a 0 - o 465 Printed Name +i S o cp 0 r P 4 \\ \ff_ N; D COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION 0 bp 4) 7i."" O C] 0 CU 46N 60.. ,,a 1 Gh._io 4) h O .5.- bU ba, tri Z M Od rcs Q) .y o. rhLl a 8 . 0 ° ar 4 "" 1.)~0 ai ",.0,a E 5 'A a. E.,' j i t'0 m g -+q 7iv v CD ay,+�/I -� LVA El �{ a)ri) 41 O Q 2 {,, 8 [y 8 S1 C0 A ,.-q 2. ci r_i lai 44 .5 [1: c�} v., U CO 0A .6 i t ; 4 2 1) (1.1 t)f) A c> id - v 0 0 0 Pd r? a~ lit a 12,g G640 ill • t 481.2", g uppj.,m, 1§ :14 "g AY, ar.„..,E cal -0 >cal 10191%gag 0 t IbILW-0° Q i i gni 2 h.) A) LL I 1 1 (z;fr • nzs k. tsurst Lsg q N 16-d of 1 TY CITIZENS PETITION w �' N tin a EA 0 c En � _ f-1--,'41. : el °a.Cg . M e' = m of S„ ' °'0,4) 44 .;< a ' ;IS ` o o Co 1_,i O ,,...f.,} .o. 4, En 0./ ID = rte-, 12 D 0 0 � Z.', in 'ct 6, • 5 .— 4i � #h -'g O V� U' dpi 0,,o,. :6 ,V0) o Euz al.2Q to 0 ar 4-, Ca o - 43 as E .r3 0. Oil — a• 2ba.. — 0 . 0 " 4} W 0 Y`,3 . M r4,i) MI MI i6 li .0 tri p «Mt .4 V .5 8 c1 Sr y s •0 0 .7=',.,s F: '•''c o Cr N , F1, 0 4) e, 0 4. low V) cc 0 cc t L 0 =\o It CONCERNED CO 4' ,, an • ol ice', 4�, 4 3 1 f! .0 1 ....., 8 E iv :a cii , 0 N4 4.9. .--,.., -g ..,..): .8 0 0,k) N .1 t� A0 tr, c.,.,o„..1U i (j4W04g4. ▪ Ti., fn 1 g 1 b ..ci ri, 'ffl 0 u, 0 a - 0 47Z 01 thlo',-.1,b''' h) .s• uto....40-0?) cis • d 0,, ''''.'tair^ .. . 64 4 M sv C▪ .) -114.1113;c4) fr--114) 44 ° .5 g 4 9,741 0 .4 -8 1 CONCERNED COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION a' " N, my q) :� ' g V] 4-1 CI CIc o N c. e, , i 0 ' G] 4) 79 M A N r" W qsj 1 • .,, g bD Q 7-1 2.. ��r u 8 ^..y o m -" .�! i , '_' </, 0 •--' rd •- c) aris , x ,s ai r 0 4 fil f_.4) U = F' .0 $ , ;; r'n 1) or, cA 15 0 bu r 0 .. U ,.+ .-M " . 4? CS c 8 u.•N � `cO 8"'.o4"5 ' µ i v :>,.. (. y,R 1 „may Ci la , E 15 a vw a1i-i 0= it g as O yij 0; v, to bG w :r . 14 A -0 " t" it er '-0 '= d ,-, r, u cd cC ca . Printed Name L t \, I ‘\\ r\ J' r� r a a Z a qji Zs) t bU � t flo 4• z � v rZ3z 7 175q Z a f .a -'Q rpt "4y0 rsi 2.4 as EI 4 " .,— DN tD .5 71" ` V 1t 1 a Q M Q" N ,. :",, U CO _7 • °`•' ` 4i co , V ,-I ' 4 •an i t) w . . V. 15 P ter ai w i Q61 )1 44 I k 1 f 0 8 j IL A,�o ocm fErt 101 7d t; Nia aVg4 IL: 41001 Alt41 g 734 h1i 11 4 pip .0SivIA2 uomo S.117111.i,Q +TI 1 0 0.4z 0 8 4i1 .4) Ai; i UE6 .10 a AF a a miu A IP . 018 MA=1Ailis. 1a11.0.--lvdg .•wim�, §` 73 et 0 p tts .11.400 PLel 1\9 j 1E .� pp idg orn ,00.g TA, Rt 2m. g 14] z 101 ri 0 A14,- Nie #1 O a &Nogg E O ski /8 U ginoia Intedi q418 C.44 411 4E7E= =tEl 49E0a- 28 • o,, m. 481W Mg .0C3i ti kic-e8N 6'4 tilq4e51* 11 COMMUNITY CITIZENS PETITION 0 C7 0 ,..=8 f.a) 00 �n› �u 6 nr) .. ‘CI o_ L . )-c N a at II 3 43 b 2 El, H!a va o w � 73 SI c4 g p ?Igo � .� C�, 8 rte. �Y'1 � o F9 c— G4 :_---0 'CI, W U J .W ""2 0 A•V 5 ,a 124 0 0 w ch o 0 di I O , al P. . In 73 0 "-' 41 0 a f ° !L.)g 0 a ro g n a8i .8 v '6 (0 ,) , vim, 4 "t 8-d A dJ = � pUi O 4) 00 ' U 'FI ^1 c'�i'� 8 TY CITIZENS PETITION W z a.,, as E 0 0 0 • CL, a, a C7 rgeiE -.+1 ,.tea +CU ,3 8 g4 Q., y93 .0"..El▪ l yr) co -45 — ,,... 8 ." g r{ aj O yj crj .472, U 5 4 g E CS 4..4 c2 � —u78 i --i ,.-y Lw 7 : ,d fai iia g o i c.'''' 2 - u 0 ›, 0 ..., 3 C V ›, w m -a o a> CI 0 c. 0 «..▪ . �0 > c ai ,s 2 cg '6 0 —ei 4-- ,I: E -., 'IA in.,,c 4,, it, a) 2 v,CI4 V a) U H = 47 cin y.. a) ,Ev ++- 6›., a.,.! .6.,— — , 1-2 .,:i . ,?:,,, 4) 5 4- r -i ,,' iv bbl ' cea E 0 161 g ' ti 2 ✓ 41 eKI a-. w a dr gI 53 '1) .$ - 0 b c• A L) .o' ta-L 1.14 s a � pw UNITY CITIZENS PETITION 11 :4) as Li a w CA CO 1:14 0 .,; a a. - 0 4-4 ill g it p;-..-i• c.> .3 e4 �; .. > ...4 x4115 ' En u u 0 .. ? % E' '' N w �" E45 .y VCr =r • M Crl & a) .' 0 "4 , • `� sb N 0 f]" > p P H go 7.4 I a.1 U stl ' ,_, U d) C* TA m Cti r,0 c6. .2 • ca a to w, WI E--� - o0 :g t71 t5 O e O o n a} ru • 1 +1-- fi''� 'C3 0 LI a) : v5' 0 IL 6.0 (n a)..0 0, co j W b!) 'a:a V g 2 g vi a 1-4 tea 10aEel 0 rq o 0 • "'I /:14 0.) N -`4',--,-4 ,.,_, ., , 0 . „„ 0,, _ ., 0 ,... 2- _ .,,, .,.. c„.,.., . 08 75 mi a o7:3 Lb ' c w . - g ° zal I'44 CO° U:! c._)tea 0 78 ,!44 4 !,i,_,1,11, °.)0 0 0 •-- E O 0 W ° Q"• o a 0 o n m re, "al 2 74 0.) ' 1 ''.....", 6. cp , E . .4..„., 0 -8 li g 0.) d] cn c} bA c49 c`0 — , GAJ 'd 2 1 ^VP 8 • o 'd CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO a 1 a t ckh .mow Qz 0 173tl .2 t .12 sit. 1.---,---..- 4-_-_-.Ncx----: (---\ c.i.,, r ,c, bir c....\ -- U .4 • on f'", O �1 W ! Y1s .V i - i 0.F P .i. (40 Ei:: §:lf.?, 2 4,,-;;-/ n1▪ .5n .5 .2 04 0 u) ,t'D t5 5 , , • ..-, , DI „ al V'°i�CA � a.4) 6ga v 76 `4 E;(9 . 1 wil ' 1 ° ' sC? 2 ° ar -' o u V'' a°tle% ptias0g 8 °a 4,,. ,� . 4- nv.� 0u GI 0 rc) OL - i o m` Ac a S1" i • k a m rt 4 r ki ITY CITIZENS PETITION 1) g g iob o o t" w tirrri - - OD o -a ,-.4 vi .0 E 4 . - °W 0 o, 7 +••' aa") 'ovv)d a°'ijo 4, "c E o a a) VI - m O,.,.' -¢•r., 2 t i� 4' ai r a:a A 0a, i`n -c a -, 3, R v 0 biU w u . t) 2 vct 8 p , A t, •Di § ,-,ri 61 N 0 .'J .� ,Cil as o t o U �n Gp 4} - 'f2 ,, o 4il 0 6-4, a it?!,4Na ti x.i, �y+,� �W V i Y {�� 0e0 N 11% t4. -E ,t5) 0 0 -CI g' 7rel Of›; .g-glil .1t181 w:t; t, 1.41 8 '0 0 . ,§ g,,°.e• Ifo t. 1.4149'4 J (2g;gPli,sici Uh rt Vo car,) A9 a O 2 RI PAZIO4V 5;131 gt gabagtilf(!, D a .:' 8g1,(22thg 4rEi 1 n1 A 77-4 r -c of its citizens. The 0 1 2 8 b a) tu cts a) 0 n ezt ati ki • ^{�}L)751 24 .`a ,2 48 0— 8 ca 4 MI iy Com} Ctl 0 4.4 en 71 V E a 0 t cis .,-4 ch 0 CIO 0 g as tu v a 0 00 0 0 $� 0 r 0 cou ' n I go -a Cg .5 0 ..4--. a, . 9.g. ,,, .,.. 'a' 0 0 N o ,. E. �'r, 0 0 a' w w w, 0 0 � . ,4 ,2 a) O 5 — t 11 1Cq N Li Q1 1,1 c ).-_ c''.. It g \iN 1 4 .m . cw 112 -%4 ja) I 175 1— PL N gv,p, T. Z: ° O Az jkl O 'C CY UNITY CITIZENS S PETITIO CONCERNED CO v 8 0 N net a) o .... i 0 15 on g ?, ,Eg U g L E . . .02 " C3 Hi v ,* °' o z.� 0 ro•W, ,°'cpu9to8 o Q g 4) H .xa cigv au . S 1)cn w oa' Ra o CU 2 -tg .-,Ifrijrd, •4 ,.q +` r" = ..4-,2, � N cw, P ' Pl ''.41 't ri, _b N yl, wi p 4) 4ri i ..., 0.) c� CI) �3 c�ay 0 6 vii 2 vgi aA t� Q cv aA v 'b ~E g t a '7 1T _41 11) 4-1 tri 1,.. "`"4 i _El E,•5., �' 8g. d Y CITIZENS PETMON ..r s 8 a4 .N a I1 - -W ry 0 in `1-1 ..1 b 0.9,E 4 Q . 0 - M. j 0 car, "s a, .r cv) N. 4, pA p 6 • g a a to o ,...' -8•M,31.2r 0 mboa • W • r W �"I ly • J 74 g 2° vy F M 4,3 . - ' '6'C s ,C7 � C? Q7 r-- Q ° O; 1)..QL) w 0N 4) O ezko a,, -w U ,,, . '0 0 •,.. b . a'_• •W '- • 4 L) W V) l4) U 11-43"CI fy`ootiD N — • II �€) R -8 — . g., 03 0 a c1 o 0 nzt 0 NN 13- n V N r \\ ts C A CITY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO V b Nva,''~ w 0 ch o ° • .•••in, p nn ° a . c'.5 ' • p 01 µa ' ..... a ' '5 g a) ••qV co N rii g ❑ c E,+❑- 0 ▪ ,•{',` ❑ -, rx cd `� cci 2 49 to g PEE. ai = bIy Q 0§..,,, -"nn S"., 4� 0 CCS •'" •t,7 N 'r-. »-� a) l., a. , c0 0 4'' w 0 c)- as w a9 r� s 0,—,0 L) 2 ay • y 2 A • ❑MI▪ tet' B t'4' "44 o ° E m' ' ' r4,1) H cd ca ti'0 • 4) >-• 'vi e--, +w ai, ❑.O • - NU F r• aw c) 0a 0 a) • . T, �' v y W .. 0 6 - O 1-4 .- c0 -- , P 0.0 0.) tts 3 r z n4, 4, CU ▪ b ▪ 01 d 4 1,. N t4)• -rt a 0 (J., LE..., —,.',3. L • °.u0i �,as N. . ,„... O 01 0 Oil a) `' i, an 0d �r, tri' -d c3 -a CSE V • cal D a ' a" O '' .;.. c+..0 ill +.1 - ;is4 al0 ,+ z + r cd Q -0 V ^j •,v), .5. .Q i O v, 00 D n,o ° 0;7 g 0 .0 a[? „� as V D al; -��77 ca a ' . W P 0 W A l o to an ' 'v, as t p g , V 0 ob nvi 0 1721. 13 rttit a 2 � a ti 43 0 Rt 417 t z 4-,a ww 0 1.7 41 a} 8 cdi O O 4 j 'C� `` e.4 _ bb N ... 0 4 ba 0 co 0 cc o4-0 ° o= 5 cr. 0 aU GI 04 a o 74 itnf .5 w "" 8 (j} 4) El' El 'VI ,b ..0 E.'.4 as co y • tiS `. W E as o Aii o0� c.' 5 , e, CD g � ' .° b R , a•a� , to g -0 — ..t.i .2 g 2, t'i) 4?-, owes a...,,,,,: . ..tt, 1 , t 4) L) ai .M '2, ›.,.d s p ct N • :i o 8 4_, e*i ' -; 8 Ci o Q S c) .18qLs o 21 g 4 c! Sao lot '1:]UH 44 = sep �, as .. 5 .0 ' L 0S �4 =' ct ;3 -0 O to 'a TY CITIZENS PETITION CONCERNED CO v o '43a A L. 4- >P 6A ▪ w n .- "3 - 0" r ' 0 0 = tan"" .may Q g (*1 c4 in t ti It .'^ W "0 , M U . } ch �P a.0 ° O . -� 11S 4T3 v1 N] 0 - -0 '"" o 4} { T) 11 l'''' g °G g .d' "'S O W w cq ,-...4"Cj a E ccl N 0 0 w8 u a 0.f U 0 ni Q 0 0 ti g -6 ) t 41 vi = Q b N co vi 0 0 ,. 0 gob4• 6 tit E .,m . , u ar Printed Name • g 4 4 H .410 q 14 • 17) V) o a •t u U Da 0 4 v o w U �53 q C O � O • 0 q ▪ E v f"9m ,,qs „ ,N, Guide to Islamic Invasion of America by 2020 WAKE UP AMERICA! YOUR LIVES ARE AT RISK! 10. Reading, writing, 'arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student cen- ters (now 1500) should be sprinlded with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are 300 ex- clusively Muslim schools with loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution. 11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish "Centers for Islamic studies" with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher education institutions. 12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, not the truth, which is Islam hijacked the terrorists. Furthermore in January of 2002, Saudi Arabia's Embassy in Washington mailed 4500 packets of the Quran, videos, promoting Islam to America's high schools—free. They would never allow us to reciprocate. 13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards the Mus- lims in America ho are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries. 14. Nullify America's sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodi- cally terrorize Americans of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls. (We have experienced this too often since 9-11.) 15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not American's justice system. 16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S. but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dol- lars. 17. Raise interest in Islam on America's campuses by insisting that freshman take at least one course on Islam. Be sure that the writer is a bonafide American, Christian, scholarly and able to cover up the violence in the Quran and express the peaceful, spiritual and religious aspect only. 18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media of their visibility. 19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook. 20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the US by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America. Guide to Islamic Invasion of America by 2020 WAKE UP AMERICA! YOUR LIVES ARE AT RISK! 1. Terminate America's freedom of speech by replacing it with hate crime bills state-wide and nation-wide. 2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities to promote Islam as the original African -American's religion while Christianity is for the whites! Strange enough, no one tells the African-Americans that it was the Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves, neither the fact that in Arabic the word for black and slave is the same, "Abed." 3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith. 4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office for favorable legislation to Islam and support potential sym- pathizers by block voting. 5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the internet by buying the corporations or a controlling stock. 6. Yield to the fear of imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America — the black gold. America's economy de- pends on oil, (1000 products are derived from oil), so does its personal and industrial transportation and manufac- turing -41% comes from the Middle East. 7. Yell, "foul, out -of -context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran" anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena. 8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions, get membership in local school boards. Train Mus- lims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way. Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America? 9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via: • Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961) • No birth control whatsoever — every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later. • Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and re- marry every five years — since one cannot have the Muslim legal permission to marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America. • Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2000 released inmates have joined Al Qaida world-wide). Only a few have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil. So far — sleeping cells! CI) N 'C " • • • tQ ct ct cn E h 0 E cl as bA c, -1-) c.) c.) ..--( a -P cid 11) .R .!_—_,( cu 0 ,4 re40 bO U .) cu m $-0 •-•1 "a 't .com/must-watch-three-things-vou-must-know-about-islam a� 0 a) a) remacist-mos ad.com/atlas shrugs/2010/08/islamic-su a) 0 must-know-about-islam 0 om/must-watch-three-things- 0 0 • You tube what islam is not 4- (13 131-3 1)0312 0.CU03 c J20.1; -0C 4) Q) ai 3 150•E0 N • F- G • cri 0 . a} 4J0721 C13 .6 00 • Vl r W 0 of Q .§ O G N C0 y CU ▪ C>a) Jr1 C _ 13 of 0 w - 0 > as 'OC 03 -8 Its3 E a`f��s.ni 0rl 314., c 0• '0 Tc._ toa)�a3 — c 6Y0 16 2in w 3 WHEN WILL AMERICA STAND UP AND RESIST THIS MUSLIM TAKE OVER OF OUR COUNTRY! Islam is already controlling our daily lives. Airport screenings are a direct result of Islam in America. 13. The possession or h:.rboring of dogs v+rill be bttuned, Loose dogs will be killed.. Here is what daily life in modern America will look like when sharia law is imposed on us. I hesitate to say "if' this is imposed on us because we are already in the preliminary stages of Islamic authoritarianism, and the lack of protest against it suggests this trend will continue for some time. 1. If you have a public swimming pool in your city or community, half of each day or even of each week will be reserved solely for women. If it is outdoors or is an indoor facility, a high solid fence and/or heavy curtains will be installed to prevent outsiders from seeing the women. (Note: this has already been done in Great Britain). 2. Seating at public events, theatres, movies, concerts, sports arenas and other public facilities will be divided, with women required to sit on one side and men on the other whether they are married or not. 3. All institutions, companies, public buildings, recreational facilities and municipal government facilities will be required to suspend their work five times a day to allow Muslims to pray. Prayer facilities for Muslims only will be mandatory, one for women and one for men. 4. The serving of pork and pork products such as ham and bacon, seafood, and other non -halal foods will be prohibited in schools and all public institutions and public places. Food preparation companies that provide food to these places will be prohibited from preparing non= -halal foods or foods containing non=halal ingredients on their premises. 5. The sale and serving of alcoholic beverages will be prohibited in all public facilities such as cafes, pubs, airplanes, trains, etc., with consumption of them allowed only in private homes and membership clubs. 6. The distribution and sale of Christian and Jewish religious materials such as the Old and New Testaments will be banned. 7. Universities will be prohibited from teaching courses about the history of non -Muslim religions. 8. Study of the Koran in all schools will be mandatory. 9. Criminal penalties will be imposed on anyone questioning or criticizing Islam, its books and its prophet, ranging from fines to imprisonment to execution. These will also apply to Muslims who date or marry non -Muslims. 10.Head covering will be required of all Muslim women everywhere and at all times. 11. Muslims will attempt to amend the Pledge of Allegiance to add the words "and his prophet Mohammed" after the word "God". This will eventually be extended to American coins and paper currency. 12. The beating, physical abuse or murder of Muslim women by their husbands or male family members will not be punishable by law. 13. Th tlossessit►n or harhoring Of dogs will be banned. i ocs+e does will be killed. 14 Sale of 'immodest" clothing and lingerie will be banned. Women wearing 'immodest" clothing will be arrested and punished. 15. Taxi drivers will be prohibited from taking on passengers who cavy alcoholic beverages. (Minneapolis taxi drivers already tried this). Educate yourself on the truth of Islam. http://www. citizenwa rrio r.com/2009/O1/stop-m uslim-immigration-to-u n ited. htm I l�tit p;//atlas_shrugs200©w typepg ,comVali ksjhrugs/20110/08/t, l am i cAtipretnacist-ro uc -a-prim http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/ Itzlivyww,therightscoop.com/must-watch-thr things -you -mu t-kn.oy-Atlut _Wam http://www.whatislamisnot.com http://v/ww.islamreview.com/ rtes Subject: Can good Muslim become a good American? Interesting questions for the Muslim Community to discuss & for research on our part also. Can a good Muslim be a good American? I forwarded that question to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his forwarded reply: Theologically - Religiously - Scripturally - Geographically - Socially - Politically Domestically Intellectually Philosophically - Spiritually NO! Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon God of Arabia. NOI Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256) NO! Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran (Koran). NO! Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he tums in prayer five times a day. NO! Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews. NO! Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and the destruction of America the great Satan. NO! Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys NO! Because they will confiscate and kill our pets and kill the ones found on the streets NO! Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt. NO! Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co -exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic. NO! Because when we declare "one nation under "God "the Christians God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Qurans 99 excellent names. Therefore after much study and deliberation.... Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously CANNOT be both "good" Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish it's still the truth. You had better believe it! If you find yourself intellectually in agreement with the above statements, perhaps you will share this with your friends. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand. Barack Hussein Obarna, a Muslim, is the Muslim they selected to put in our White House. Pass it on to Fellow "Americans". SHARIA LAW This begs to question, can a house divided still stand? Many ask whether sharia law and democracy can co -exist. However, the larger question is whether sharia law and human rights can co -exist. The answer to these questions is a resounding So what is sharia law? It is the fusing of religion, government and private life into one codified body of law based on Islam's religious ideology that governs everything from politics to econom- ics, from banking to business and from family issues to sexuality, even going so far as to legislate private matters such as hygiene. Separation of church and state, a principle on which democracy in America was founded, is non -existent in Islamic countries ruled by sharia law. Sharia law is so all-encompassing that is leaves no room for independent thought, freedom of speech or freedom of religion. Sharia Law dictates, for example: * How and when to pray.. * How to divide your possessions to your heirs upon your death. Vv" nether you should bathe after being intimate with your wife. Yes, sharia law will even legislate this matter, for obedience to the law requires obedience to Allah and his messenger and the jurisprudence they implemented in 7th century Arabia. T okt come specific sharia 19 e to Fee whether they are compatible w.vth Western pl!nciples Since Islamic countries currently implement sharia law to varying degrees, we will focus on funda- mental jurisprudence as dictated by Saudi Arabia, the home of Mecca and the keeper of the "purest" form of Islam and Islamic law. All laws listed below are directly from Alifta.com a web- site for official "fatwa" (legal opinions) issued by the General Presidency of Scholarly Research and Ilia (issUi ig fatwa) of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sharia Law & Freedom of Speech: * c, punish D'<icmt fr np�?ntn'v ( milting nY d!Iscnrding �11'�!" TCii mic J�i�1�Ci1( i i.1 fi . i'. Ste. b. .£ .. ,. .. tt�+..4 :. .:, (, � ,.. :sl_ a„ e' e.. n �t, Fatwa 4400, Part No. 1 Page 334 & 335 * Mocking anything in the Quran or the Sunnah of the prophet Muhammad is apostasy and therefore punishable by death. Fatwa 2196, Part No 2, Page 42 * Criticizing Islam, sharia law or the Sunnah of the prophet Muhammad is apostasy and there fore punishable by death. Fatwa 21021, Part No. 1, Page 414 *My Muslim who states a preference for democracy rather than shari law or questions anything in the Quran or Sunnah is a kafir (disbeliever) considered an apostate and therefore sentenced to death. Fatwa 19351, Part No. 22, Page 239-248 Sharia Law & Hunian Rights * The punishment for theft is amputation of the right hand up to the elbow. Fatwa 3339, Part No. 22, Page 218 & 219. * The penalty for premarital sexual intercourse is 100 lashes with a whip and one year of exile. Volume 3, Part No. 3 Page 359 * The penalty for adultery between a married man and a married woman is 100 lashes with a whip and death by stoning. Volume 3, Part No. 3 Page 359 * The penalty for homosexuality is death. Fatwa 4324, Part No. 22, Page 53 & 54 * Non-muslims living in lands ruled by Islamic law (sharia law) must pay a poll tax (jizyah) in order to be subdued and feel subjugated to muslims. Refusal to pay the tax grants muslims the right to wage war against the non-muslims. Fatwa 4461, Part No 1, page 215., Volume 3, Part No. 3, Page 183-190 * Waging war against non-muslims (jihad), even those who are peaceful, is encouraged so that other religions and atheism will be purged from the earth. Volume 2, Part No. 2 page 437-440. * If a muslim kills a Jew or Christian dhimmi (one who pays the poll tax), he must pay only half the amount of "blood money" he would have to pay for killing a muslim. Fatwa 5414, Part No. 21 Page 245 Sharia Law & Women's Rights: Women are permitted an education in Islamic issues (religious education) and family Duties, but academic study is not encouraged. Fatwa 9019 Women are not permitted to attend universities where both men and women are taught or all -female schools with male teachers. Fatwa 13814, Part No 12, Page 150 Women over the age of puberty are not permitted to leave the house without covering the Body (except face and hands). Fatwa 667, Part No 17 Page 142-150. Women are not permitted to visit the graves of loved ones. Fatwa 2501, Part No. 1 Page 429, Women are not permitted to obtain passports (since their photographs on them may tempt Men) unless for the purpose of making Hajl (pilgrimage to Mecca). Fatwa 2595, Part No. 1,Page 719 Subject: FW: info on Harmoush Here is a report from the Rabbi. Please let me know if any further information is needed. The Imam Mahmoud Harmoush is ,an operative of the Islamic Brotherhood. He Is Syrian byfi(rth and Nationality.. au • ed_b i I ; If "Yo: of Ke n" who Is Am "protests" and "fundraisincas". s i ai: b . ved to have se :din the S : rie . tl `l nal I t; Ili! ence Co, . S an av just can't seem to find his records at present. He is also an expert in Islamic Prowpwa+dwda o Communications?' Mahmoud Harmoush joined the World Languages and Literatures (WLL) Department in the Winter of 2007 to teach Arabic Language and Islamic Culture. He was.bom and raised in Syria and completed his college education in the USA. He earned a B.S. in Economics from the Califomia State Polytechnic University in Pomona and a Master's of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies and Second Language Acquisition from Mountain State University in West Virginia. Mr. Harmoush holds many educational and leadership positions at several institutions in Southern California. He currently leads the community in Temecula / Murrieta where he also teaches Arabic Language and Islamic Studies and organizes community events. Mr. Harmoush has traveled and conducted business in several parts of the wort& He is highly informed on the Middle East and the Global affairs. A Gulf newspaper reports that Mr. Harmoush emigrated from Syria in the mid-1980s and according to their website, he is a member of the leadership council of the Syriilin American Council which is headed by Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) leader Louay Safi and also includes ISNA President Safe Zarzca ir. As documented by a Hudson Institute report, ISNA is an important part of the USMB. o , i » Ie ties to the . i» » al Musil B » erhood incld * Mr, Harmoush may have also hpd a leadership role in Important 44lamic student organizations tied I the Global Muslim Brotherhood. For example, a report on Muslims in the Caribbean Identifies a Mahmoud Harmoush as the 1993 Caribbean representative for the Internat orpal Federation of Islamic Student CtroanizationsJlHFSGI, an organization In which many leaders in the Global Muslim Brotherhood belong at one time including Ahmed Totonli of International Institute of Ilslamic Thought IIIT who la a rominent rat : ;' n theCarrib e . n branch of IIFS° at one time. part of the US Muslim Brotherhood. As late as June 2008, the website of the Muslim World Lear ue MFL Can : !. d a M : h no d Harrnoush living In LA as one of its approved speakers. The ti » to the Glo ; I Muslim Brotherhood. This rrrak vein as Bin Laden, Mahmoud Harmoush /Approximate age 52 years, suffers from high blood pressure, and mood swings and metabolic disorders. Part-time Lecturer, World Languages and Literature's California State University, San Bemardino L'Shalom, 1 cc: P. Richardson -7Z7i� J RECOMMENDED READINGp�° I=2/D g The Islamization of America The Islamic Strategies and The Christian Response. This book reflects the cry of Abdul- lah's heart to offer America an eye-opening wake-up call. It is far more than just another book on Is- lam. It unveils the Islamic strategies used to Islamize America. It offers a practical plan to stop the oblit- eration of our Christian civilization before it is too late. This book is available thru: /www [siamReview.coln bookZc r,cold/b oks/1413.htotol klitII) i. illl01) IncricA The Islamization of American Schools Under the guise of teaching "World history and geography," Muslim activists are infiltrating the Ameri- can educational system. The impressionable young minds of our boys and girls are being indoctri- nated to potentially accept and embrace the religion of Islam. This is the goal behind the course on Islam that is currently being taught to the 7th graders in the California public school system and other schools around the country. http://www.IslamReview. corn wwwvbookloc.ker.com/books/1413.httnl Sharia Law for Non -Muslims - Author Bill Warner This book is an excellent, MUST read expose on Sharia Law that will take you from zero to knowing more about Sharia Law (Islamic Law) and political Islam than 98% of the American public. I strongly urge all legislators, pub- lic servants, law enforcement and clergy (and anyone else who cares about this threat) to get this "silver bullet" of knowledge that is all resource based and tightly composed. There is zero fluff or opinion in this book. It is incredi- bly easy to read and serves as an excellent resource for educating others on this topic. I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand the greatest threat facing America and the civilized nations of the world. h ttp:' ESCAPING ISLAM - Author Mano Bakh We may all have crossed paths with Iranians, and we may read the paper daily to see the Muslim conflicts around the world. This book helps us understand what is really at the heart of these issues, how once again religious fervor is misused and becomes something truly evil. There is nothing like a personal story and perspective to help us all understand and perhaps combat the forces and "traps" which are at work even now to destroy the good works being done in other cultures and faiths around the world.. .and they are not as far away from our own backyard as we may think! This book is a riveting account of a religion "gone bad" when distorted by those who would set out to destroy the freedoms that so many take for THEY MUST BE STOPPED! - Author Bridgette Gabriel They Must Be Stopped is a wake-up call for the West which "wallows in a state of denial and ignorance, bullied by political correctness and refusing to listen to our enemies who have an understanding of peace and tolerance different from ours." She shows that democratization is not an end in itself. Hamas and Hezbollah, for instance, are democratically elected terrorist organizations, Di Di Daw Daw Di Di THEY MUST BE ST DiDiDawDawDiDi - Author Jim Horm But I really had no choice. This is a no-nonsense discourse on Islam that should be required reading for everyone in the federal government. While some of the book has been edited by the CIA, it still contains a great deal of information that you will not find anywhere else. The author has a wealth of experience living in Islamic coun- tries during many years of service stationed at various American Embassies. Even in "moderate," Islamic coun- tries like Turkey there is a defining undercurrent of thought that is diametrically opposed to fundamental Ameri- can Values of freedom, independent thought and liberty. If you are looking for a politically correct, "can't we all just get along," approach, you wont find it here. This is the unvarnished truth about the philosophical battle that will define the future course of history. It is thoroughly compelling reading. www.shoebat.com/ CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK— www.ChristianAction.org "Today Jamaat ul-Fuqra has more than 35 suspected communes and more than 3,000 members spread across the United States, all in support of one goal: the purification of Islam through violence" ifp r TERROR ... is coming to America's schools. And the experts believe it's not a question of "if" ... but "when." According to a "restricted" law enforcement report: "Preparations for attacks on American schools that will bring rivers of blood and stouoerinu hndv counts are well nnderwav in Islamic terrorist camps." How is Saudi Arabia funding and recruiting homegrown terrorists inside the U.S.? ISLAM RISING: Geert Wilders Warning to the West Geert Wilders lives with a constant death threat over his head. AI-Oaeda has vowed to kill him. As a Dutch parliamentar- ian and outspoken critic of radical Islam, Mr. Wilders must travel with four bodyguards and sleep in a safe house, each and RESEARCH • c ligls r WN ACTJC)H HF,rpHK ILL lalannlc Enemy Camps Surround U.S. www. concernedamericancitizens. org - Separating Sharia Law from Islam www.actforamerica.com - We are in for the fight of our lives and we must ACT! - before it's too late. 7trzm7 fll,,, i, n+ ,..v..,., www.christianaction.org www.islainreview.com http://cspipublishing.com/ -vw th a ightss; oo;l_rc http is lassbr a.t� i/uruuiist:.,watch-t gree.. T,.- TIT r\ n-..- 'ITC A IlW - For truth about the terrorsim from Islam in America. - The Islamic Strategies and The Christian Response. - What is the true nature of Islam? ua fcuuo.,.ul�ouut i�ol� a tuuauua/atl as_ lluuus 0 Q $/istar i vpuema is i 0. 0 a :..JP .crm.x. htt;lr,;//I.auenak:edusiard.pru .s: com./ http;//wwwjherightscoop.com/must-vva s-ymu� past- aabcaut .a.sla http:// V hatisfarn sirtot.col http://www.y uu.ttibe.com/watch` .vr 1../ii;f b 90CD0&fi at.ye #2 Sharjah Islamic Law in America and ]f urope- What the West 'Needs `l:' a l ::u oIw u.,�lli.t A critique of the co rse . .4„,. ledook on Islam taught to p!? -7th grade students in. California PublicSchools January 12, 2011 The Honorable Mayor and Town Council The City of Temecula, California 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 cc: P. Richardson Recoveo JAN 192 j C( AG e �R s Re: Islamic Center of Temecula Valley Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: ICOM INTERFAITH COALITION ON MOSQUES We write in support of the Islamic Center of Temecula Valley's ("The Center's") application for a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP"). The Interfaith Coalition on Mosques THE INTERFAITH COALITION ON MOSQUES (ICOM) carefully monitors incidents of mosque discrimination around the counrxy, including assisting Muslim communities who are being denied permission to build mosques in their neighborhoods. Made up of some of the foremost interfaith leaders of the Muslim, Jewish, and Christian faiths (a list of members is attached hereto as Exhibit A), ICOM uses its voice to help Muslim communities who are encountering prejudice in the building of religious institutions. ICOM believes that the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. ("RLUIPA") controls this matter and favors the Center's application for a CUP. Factual Background The initial CUP in this matter was unanimously granted on December 1, 2010 by the local planning commission which determined that the Center compiled with local laws and would be aesthetically suitable to the community. Opponents of the facility have filed this appeal to City Council. While some critics voiced concerns about increased traffic, congestion and noise in the area, others voiced fears about Shari'a law and about how the Center would be a refuge for terrorists. One of the leaders of this anti -mosque protest, Diana Serafin, 59, said Muslims want to take over the U.S. from within. 'We have a constitutional right to freedom of religion," she argued. "But Islam is more than a religion. It is an ideology to enforce Sharia law [Islamic jurisprudence] in America, and Shari'a law is in direct contrast to the American Constitution."' efnation/ ticle/0,8599,2012134,O0.htm ixzz17NSpQ hC The Honorable Mayor and Town Council The City of Temecula, California January 12, 2011 Page -3- Under the statute, the Center carries the initial, very low burden of proving that planned government conduct satisfies at least one of RLUIPA's jurisdictional prerequisites, and that that conduct imposes a "substantial burden" on the Center's "religious exercise." See 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc(a)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(b). If that burden is carried, the government agency seeking to impose the regulation must prove that the imposition of a substantial burden on the Center's religious exercise is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. Here, the Center would have no difficulty in demonstrating that a reversal of the previous land use determinations would substantially burden its exercise of religion. See, e.g., City of Ladue v. Gilleo, 512 U.S. 43 (1994); see also WestchesterDay School v. Village of Mamaroneck, 417 F.Supp.2d 477 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). The burden would then shift to the government -Defendants to show that there is a compelling interest. It is well-settled that compelling governmental interests are those that protect public health, safety or welfare. See Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 215 (1972) ("[O]nly those interests of the highest order and those not otherwise served can overbalance legitimate claims to the free exercise of religion."); Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398, 406 (1963). ("[I]n this highly sensitive constitutional area, 'only the gravest abuses, endangering paramount interests, give occasion for permissible limitation."' Nothing in the appeal lays out even the possibility that such a compelling interest is present in this case. In fact, appellants appear to be asking this Council to engage in unlawful viewpoint discrimination by asking this Court to rule that the Center's views of politics and/or religious laws are so disfavored as to be punishable by a denial of a land use permit. The Supreme Court has clearly and repeatedly held that government may not punish disfavored viewpoints under the guise of legitimate regulation. Nat'l Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 587 (1998); Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N.Y. State Crime Victims Bd., 502 U.S. 105, 116 (1991) ("Regulations which permit the government to discriminate on the basis of the content of the message cannot be tolerated under the First Amendment."). Such discrimination would not only be unlawful, but will subject the Council and the Town to liability. Critically, RLUIPA itself makes such discrimination based on denomination unlawful. See 42 U.S.C. §5 2000cc (b)(2). Governments are unequivocally barred from using religious bias or bigotry in their decision making about land use. Id (empasis supplied). ICOM also doubts that the local planning authority would be able to show (even if they wanted to) that there are "no other alternative forms of regulation" other than the denial of the land use permit that would meet a compelling state interest, if some were present. Sherbert. 374 U.S. at 407. The Honorable Mayor and Town Council The City of Te M. calla, California January 12, 2011 Page -4 In light of the foregoing, we ask that this Council recognize the legal and practical impossibility of the Appellant's success on the merits before this or any other -- body. Conclusion Therefore, ICOM urges the Court to safeguard religious freedom and find for the Center. Sincerely, Coe Rabbi ie J.lig Greco_60.' ICOM Coordinator cc: Amanda Susskind ICOM Members Ambassador Professor Akbar Ahmed Chair of Islamic Studies, American University Dr. Saud Anwar Founder and co-chair of American Muslim Peace Initiative (AMPI) Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove Senior Rabbi, Park Avenue Synagogue Abraham H. Foxman National Director, Anti -Defamation League Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy President of the Interfaith Alliance Rabbi Eric J. Greenberg ICOM Coordinator Director, Department of Interfaith Affairs Anti -Defamation League Rabbi Irving (Yitz) Greenberg Founder of Center for Leadership and Learning (CLAL), former chairman of the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. Dr. Rev. Katharine Henderson President of Auburn Theological Seminary Dr. Rev. Joel C. Hunter Senior Pastor, Northland, A Distributed Church. Member of Advisory Council of the White House Office of Faith -Based and Neighborhood Partnerships Bishop Paul Peter Jesep American Representative for the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church Dr. Richard Land President, The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, Southern Baptist Convention Msgr. Guy A. Massie Vicar for Ecumenical and Inter -Religious Affairs, Diocese of Brooklyn Dr. Eboo Patel Founder and director, Interfaith Youth Core, member of Advisory Council of the White House Office of Faith -Based and Neighborhood Partnerships Father Robert Robbins Director, Commission for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, Archdiocese of New York. cc: P. Richardson To: Temecula City Council FROM: Jackie Sheets-Raspler RE: Temecula Planning Commission and Mosque DATE: January 16, 2011 RECEIVED JAN 19 2011 CITY MANAGER'S OFFIQE The recent ( December 1, 2010) action and accusations of the Temecula Planning Commission was appalling. It was obvious they had already made their minds up regarding their decision without listening to the citizens concerns. It is of concern that they then voiced their decision in a condescending, arrogant and critical manner. The citizens were within their rights to voice concerns about traffic, parking and environmental concerns. The citizens certainly deserved to be heard and given a response with facts that answered those concerns without name calling and labeling (CAIR Propaganda) terminology. I personally know most of the citizens addressing land use issues and they were not misinformed or Hateful. Quite the contrary. I got involved in the Mosque issue last June, after I visited the ICOTV's webpage. The mosque was supporting the 11 Muslim Students who were arrested at UCI for disrupting the speech of Michael Oren, Israeli Ambassador. A video of MLK talking about freedom to assemble and freedom of speech was also included in this support of the students rights. This video was taken off the webpage when the mosque protest began. Also on the webpage was an consultant, Hussam Ayloush. Ayloush is the Executive Director of Southern California Council of American -Islamic Relations. He is also well know in this county for being fond of comparing Israelis to Nazis and Israel to Nazi Germany. (Neuwirth, Rachel, American Thinker, February 2, 2007) Talk about filled with hate and Ayloush is a frequent guest speaker for ICOTV. I also attended "Meet the Muslims" hosted by the Temecula Interfaith Council last fall and personally met their guest speaker, MPAC President Salam Al-Marayati. Our Senate had a problem with his views years ago when his name had to be rescinded from a position on a Terrorism Board. Ayloush and AI-Marayatl are both trying to get Mamas and Hezbollah off the U. S. Terrorism list. Do you realize that the charter of both of these organizations calls for the obliteration and dissolution of Israel and then the eventual creation of an Islamic State of Palestine in Israel and the Palestinian Territories? Both of these organizations are listed as Terrorist Organizations by the US government. Concerned American Citizens has asked that the Imam denounce Hamas and Hezbollah and the Imam refused five times on MSN national news. He said he does not get involved in international political issues. But according to the Californian Newspaper of January 9, 2009, the Imam and ICOTV, along with the local chapter of Al-Awda, a Palestine rights coalition, sponsored a protest rally against Israel. This was actually a support rally for the Hamas government in Gaza. No wonder the Imam won't denounce Hamas and Hezbollah, his two major consultants are trying to get the organizations off the US terrorist list because they don't think Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations. As a citizen in this community I am concerned about the sincerity of Imam Mahmoud Harmoush. His associations with other organizations are telling us something contrary to what he presents. You have the responsibility to secure this city. You need to investigate and find the truth of what is going on behind the surface of a Mega Mosque in the city of Temecula for only 150 families. Now, what is concerning many of the Temecula citizens is the preferential treatment given to the ICOTV. There are two Christian churches setting next to each other on the back of their lots. They were forced to build on a higher elevation because of the flood plain. The ICOTV is now being allowed to build in the flood plane on the middle of their lot. The Christian churches were not allowed this option! The Baptist church had to complete a full Environmental Impact Report which the ICOTV did not have to do. Traffic and parking is horrendous. We are not bigots, misinformed, hateful or Islamaphobe's but believe all people should live in peace and assimilate as Americans to obey our Constitution. When individuals name call and label, it means they are ill-informed to address the issues in a truthful and logical manner. Thank you for your time Jackie Sheets -Rasp 38090 Stone Meado Murrieta, Ca 92562 cc: P. Richardson Iraq's Last Christians Muslim groups have killed hundreds. Survivors are fleeing into Jordan and Syria. Ey Kenneth R. Timmerman and Edward Pentin N A SCENE GROWING HORRIFICALLY familiar, io jihadi Muslims — some dressed as Iraqi police officers — stormed into a Christian church gunning down the faithful in cold blood. The attack during Sunday Mass left 58 parishioners dead and 78 wounded. Not a single person in Our Lady of the Deliverance Catholic Church in Baghdad on All Saints Eve escaped the carnage unscathed. The massacre, one of the bloodiest single assaults on an Iraqi Christian church, was among more than 7o attacks on Christians since the 2003 liberation of Iraq from the dictator- ship of Saddam Hussein. In the days that followed the atrocity, several more coordinated terror bombings in Christian neighborhoods left three dead and nearly 3o injured. Amid the drawdown of American troops and the nominal end of U.S. combat operations in Iraq, the nation's 1.5 million Christians say they are living in constant fear. Muslim insurgent groups have killed about 8o o Christians with countless others taken hostage. More than half of Iraqi Christians have fied their homes, most of them exiled to neighboring Jordan and Syria. experts say. Many more plan to flee. In 2003, the number of Christian families living in the 36 NEWSMAX !Ati_:21*2011 DEATH TOLL Furaeral procession ofa victim R:died ro,�r Llriv c1F SaivaJiofl chilrc 1.. Iraqi capital was 40,000; now, barely 5o reside there, according to figures given to Aid to the Church in Need, a Christian charity. Iraq's Christians are on the verge of extinction," says John Eibner, the CEO of Christian Solidarity International -USA who recently returned from an aid mission to the Nineveh Plain and Mosul. 'What we gave American lives to liberate this country for was not this," says Carl Moeller, president and CEO of Open Doors with Brother Andrew, a Christian aid group active in Iraq. "Most Americans would be appalled at the lack of liberty in a country we fought and died to liber- ate, and that we are watching slowly disintegrate into sectarian chaos. The church is bleeding." Survivors- of the Oct. 31 attack tell blood -curdling sto- ries about the viciousness of the al-Qaida gunmen. One of the assail - 0 5 Cower in Fear MOMEN FLASHBACK Newsmax spotlighted the perils fadng Iraq's Christian community in our May 2009 issue. Moussalli, warned a recent 'Vatican meet- ing of Middle East church leaders, that jihadi Muslims are waging "a deliberate campaign to drive out the Christians" from Iraq. "There are Satanic -plans by extremist funda- mentalist groups against Christians not only in Iraq, but in all the Middle East," he said. Religious persecution in Iraq has become so egregious that the U.SS Commission on International Religious Freedom has designated "Country of Particular Concern," ays Commissioner Nina Shea. Joseph. Kassab, executive direr- or of the Chaldean. Federation of America, says his organization is call - for the international community tervene. "Things are deteriorat- ing very fast iii Iraq; our people are left with nochoice but to flee because they are losing hope and there are no serious actions -taken to protectthem as oftoday," Kassab says. Although the attacks in Iraq have been particularly violent, Christian communities throughout the Middle East have been under siege from Muslim majorities in recent years. "There is very real pressure from Islamic extremists to demise Egypt, Just as they are trying to cleanse Iraq, and jlran. President Mahmoud] Ahrnadiriejail istrOng to cleanse. Iran," M ► I er says. This is a fun- damental struggle for the life of the Christian church." ❑ ants shot a pregnant woman after her dying husband tried to protect her and their unborn child. Another ordered a young parishioner to con- vert to Islam on the spot, then shot him in the head. Al Qaida has said it wants to drive Christians out of Iraq and from Muslim lands in general. Former GOP Rep. Pete- Hoekstra of Michigan said he believes, the U.S. rwgovernment's response to 'the per- secution of Christians in Iraq and throughout the Middle East is half- hearted and embarrassing. "I think it's fine that President Obarna is trying to build bridges to the Muslim world," he tells Newsmax. "But where is the same passion for protec " : Christians and Jews in the Middle East? It's almost scandalous that Americais not bilk- ing about this." The head of the Chaldean Church in Jordan, the Rev. Raymond JANIZARY 2011 / NEWSMAX 37 AFA ActionAlert - For Veteran's Day: A vet who understands the enem... http : //secure. afa, net/afa/activi sm/takeacti on. asp? i d=3 i afa Act onA ert f(;)rwdI($ thk Iflll)(70r)f1it() fii(-thk rind fr rrliIV'! For Veteran's Day: A vet who understands the enemy we face President Obama this week once again called Islam "a great religion" which has been "distorted" by a small number of "extremists" to justify committing acts of violence against the West. But the Qur'an (or Koran) itself, the holy book of Islam, contains over 100 verses calling for violence against Christians and Jews. To give just one example, Sura 9:5 says, "Slay the idolaters wherever you find them." During a panel discussion sponsored by the Hudson Institute last January, retired Army Lt. Colonel Allen West, who did combat duty in Iraq, responded to a Marine who asked the question, how do you answer people who say that terrorists are following a "warped" version of Islam? The panel consisted of a number of former military personnel, who fumbled around trying to answer the question. Col. West finally stepped forward answered the question directly and truthfully. Listen to the words of a former military man who understands the nature of the enemy we face: Notice again Col. West's straightforward assessment: "This is not a perversion. They are doing exactly what this book (i.e., the Qur'an) says." Col. West, by the way, was elected last week to Congress, to represent Florida's 22nd congressional district. He will be the first African-American Republican congressman to represent Florida since 1870. 1 of 2 12/27/2010 6:04 P1 AFA ActionAlert - For Veteran's Day: A vet who understands the enem.,, http://secure.afa.net/afa/activism/takeaction.asp?id=31 If you would like to add your signature to our "thank you" letter to Col. West for speaking frankly about the nature of the enemy we face, you can do so here. Don't forget to give a special "thank you" on this Veteran's Day to every member of the military you encounter. If you'd like to see the full, unedited video of the exchange, which includes the Marine's question and shows the discomfort felt by every other member of this panel in responding to the question, click here. United States/Canada Form (If you live outside the United States or Canada, please use the International form.) * E-mail Subject: * Feel free to edit this letter or send it just as it Is: (Please enter your own subject line.) Dear Col. West, We want to thank you for your honesty and directness in telling the American people about the threat that we face from the religion of Islam. We thank you also for your faithful ,service in the military, including your combat duty in Iraq. At a time when political correctness * First Name: * Last Name: * E -Mail: * State/Province: * Zip/Postal Code: * Are you a pastor? O yes O No Submit * - indicates a required field. Additional information: Ret. Lt. Col. Allen West NOTE REGARDING USE OF INFORMATION In keeping with our Privacy Policy, we may notify you via e-mail of updates on matters of importance. If, at that time, you do not wish to receive such mailings, folow the instructions provided in the e-mail message to unsubscribe. If you DO wish to continue receiving our updates, please add us to your 'approved or 'safe' Ilst so the message Is not filtered. American Family Association 1 P 0 Drawer 2440 1 Tupelo, MS 38803 1 1-662-844-5036 Copyright 2006 All Rights Reserved 2 of 2 12/27/2010 6:04 Pi Subject: FW: Islam Is Not A Religion, It Is Foreign Law SO THIS IS THE DESTRUCTION YOU PEOPLE WANT TO BRING TO TEMECULA ! A LITERAL DEATH SENTENCE TO THIS COMMUITY AND OUR COUNTRY. AMERICA IS WATCHING WHAT KIND OF MEN WILL DO THIS THEIR COMMUNITY! HAVE YOU NOTICED THE NEWS! THEY ARE KILLING CHRISTIANS AROUND THE WORLD. THEY ARE BURNING ALL NON MUSLIM CHURCHES AROUND THE WORLD. ARE Y I H f' I1 Li 1 1 ; ' R I, f P II PE, s UN°°IIIc°°HY F T1114°°i SIH s VO HH"�l T IrFs'Illi""1'I,. UR pilit °° IIH" EN i" THE 1111 r c u1111' "' III' MIIUSLEVIS D Y FUR 111 11' " ia ANIIII[/5,? 11 11""' A ERIC u1111 HH IIID Ell'°.I Al'II' Y 11 "' --- On Fri, 12/31/10, Director <directo, i educateusa.com> wrote: From: Director <director@educateusa.com> Subject: Islam Is Not A Religion, It Is Foreign Law To: "Director" <director@educateusa.com> Date: Friday, December 31, 2010, 8:58 PM 0111111111111111 IH�1111' Islam: Socially engineered society with its own laws and customs that seriously conflict with American law Islam Is Not A Religion, It Is Foreign Law By JR Dieckmann Wednesday, September 1, 2010 The time has come to question if Islam is protected under our First Amendment rights to freedom of religion. Yes, everyone in America has the right to freedom of religion, but Islam is not a religion. Religious faith is only a part of Islam. The rest is a socially engineered society with its own laws and customs that seriously conflict with American law. Is Great Britain a religion because they have the Church of England? Of course not. Britain has an established charter, civil and criminal laws, and a society that respects those laws. Islam has the Qur'an that provides the governing charter, complete with laws, punishment, and social behavior for its people in addition to its 1 religious teachings. If Islam is a religion, then Britain is also. We must recognize that religion is only one aspect of Islam`s Qur'an. The rest of this charter advances ideas, social behavior, and laws that are in direct conflict with American and western laws and values. Teddy Roosevelt once said that to live in America, immigrants must have undivided loyalty to America and to no one else. How is that possible for Muslims who swear loyalty to Islam where their governing laws are found in the Qui.' an? What legitimate religion would demand that its members either kill or convert people of other faiths? What legitimate religion is intent on imposing its own laws on the rest of the entire world? If Islam were just about praying to Allah and worshiping Mohammed and nothing more, we would not be having a problem with Islamism and Islamic terrorists. Islam has a global mission to take over and run the world according to Islamic Shariah law. How can we call that a religion? What legitimate religion in this country comes with its own civil laws that take precedence over national, state, and local laws? No, Islam is not a religion. It is a governing doctrine that not only dictates religious beliefs, but also social behavior that includes laws, penalties and punishments, not by God, but by people if the laws are not obeyed. Islam is a form of government, not a religion. It does not belong here. We already have government under our Constitution (sort of). As Muslims build their mega -Mosques in our nation - financed by Saudi Arabia - they laugh at the stupid Americans who are selling out their fellow citizens by allowing Islam to take over our country a little bit at a time. It is the same method used over decades by the Marxist Progressives who now have control of our government - take away our liberties one little piece at a time until full control and submission is achieved. We are extending a welcoming hand to the enemy of our country and western culture under the pretense of religious freedom Islamists know they cannot destroy us militarily, but they also know that they can do it with political correctness and insisting that we respect their freedom of religion, even though they have no respect for ours. We are extending a welcoming hand to the enemy of our country and western culture under the pretense of religious freedom. What religion recruits killers and terrorists in their place of worship, then sends them off to foreign training grounds to become proficient at mass murder? I know of only one. They are taught to kill in the name of God, but this is not the law of God who commanded "thou shall not kill" - it is the law of Mohammed who commanded "kill them all who will not convert." The Qur'an blurs the lines between religion and government and teaches that Islamic government is God's law The Qur'an blurs the lines between religion and government and teaches that Islamic government is God's law. It certainly is not. Why do we tolerate this abomination in America where our laws maintain a separation between church and state? To accept Islam in America is to accept Islamic law as well. Are we out of our minds? Did anyone notice that we are at war with these people? Terrorists feed on the same rulebook as other Muslims who have so far remained peaceful. Will they be making the same decision that Barack Obama made when he wrote in "Dreams Of My Father" - "When the political winds shift in an ugly direction, I will side with the Muslims?" It is always nice to know that our president is on our side when America goes to war. Too bad this one is not. L.A. now sides with Mexico and Mexican Nationals over the legal citizens of this country 2 The same thing is happening in the southern Border States where Mexicans are taking over cities one by one. You need look no further than the Los Angeles boycott of Arizona to realize that the city government in L.A. now sides with Mexico and Mexican Nationals over the legal citizens of this country. The strong Democratic population has even elected a Mexican mayor to run the city, and half of the city council members have Mexican surnames, as do many in the California state legislature. Although most of these legislators were born here in America, their loyalties seem to lie more with Mexico and Mexican citizens who are now invading our state along with other Border States. These people of Mecha and La Raza believe this land is rightfully theirs and they intend to govern it for their people. Any objections are met with charges of racism aimed at Americans who simply want to preserve the American language, culture, values, and way of life. Los Angeles has changed a great deal since this invasion began and many American have moved out to find a new homeland. What are we going to do when we see the same thing happening in the federal government? What are we going to do when Muslims demand that the United States respect and enforce Shariah law? They are already doing it in England and other European countries. It is only a short time before we see it here too. Shariah is already creeping into the courts and local laws in some states. Is that the kind of country we want? Or do we want the country that our founders created? I have no problem with Muslims living in Islamic countries overseas where they can have the kind of society they desire, as long as they leave us alone and free to enjoy the kind of society that we desire. The two cannot be reconciled into one united society any more than capitalists can unite with communists. It must be one or the other. Some people think we should be bending over backwards to make nice with Muslims and make sure they feel welcome in our country because that is what America is all about, they say. Immigrants built America, they say. To an extent, this is true if we are talking about the immigrants who migrated here to become Americans and help to build this great country over 200 years ago, Today we have way too many foreigners coming to America not to become Americans, but instead to change America. They want to dominate instead of assimilate. They want us to accept their culture instead of them accepting our culture and becoming productive members of it. Are you tired of being called "an immigrant" right here in your home country? I know I am. "America is a nation of immigrants," they say. Let me state this for the record. I am not an immigrant, I am a natural born American. My parents were born here. My grandparents and great grandparents were born here. How many others in this country have the same family history? How many people reading this have known no other flag than the American flag? We are not immigrants, we are Americans - and America is a nation of Americans - not a nation of immigrants. How much longer will we be able to call ourselves "Americans" with foreign cultures and emphases on diversity encroaching on our country? People naturally gravitate toward their own kind, not because they are racists, but because they seek the company of others with whom they have things in common. It's becoming increasingly difficult to relate to people here in Los Angeles who don't even speak our language. This creates an atmosphere of mistrust, resentment and hostility when we see our city being taking over by foreign invaders. Now we have to lock our doors both at home an in our cars. When America was being built, most everyone was an immigrant - from Europe. That was over 200 years ago. We still welcome immigrants who want to become a part of America and become American - but where do we draw the line between welcoming friends and embracing our enemies? Obviously, to those running our government, there is no line thanks largely to Ted Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, and a Congress full of 3 Democrats when they passed The Hart-Celler Act of 1965. "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs," Kennedy said. Oh really? Europe 88% Othr1% Canada 8% Latin Am• 3% Asia 4% 1901-1920 8ourob IN8 8tatletloal Latin rice' 43% 1980-1993 • Inaludse Qurlbaan If Muslims want to live and work in America and worship their prophet and God, that is not a problem. But when they try to go beyond their own personal worship and demand that we change our society to accommodate them, then that is where we need to draw the line. It is not we who should change, it is they. Just like people migrating from Mexico, they need to discard their old country ways, adapt to America, assimilate into our society, and become Americans. Muslim worship is protected under the First Amendment, Islamic law is not Muslim worship is protected under the First Amendment, Islamic law is not. Until Muslims - and our own government - can accept that, then Islam cannot be considered a religion and Islamic culture does not belong here in America. Mark Hass Director, EducateUSA ucatea..JSA lamist::Bookstore .iparr 4 . .. Ir„ .°°.unn A YOUNG SCHOOL GIRL BEHEADED BY ISLAMIST FOR momori IIIIIIIIII'I'lllll"'1111111 �••r IIII',IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, 11111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111 (C4 tlllllllllllllllllll u, 111111111111111111111111111111111 su � 111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111 II II!!!uiuulluuuuuu0 1111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIa 101111111111 1111 1111 1111111111111 111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 1111102110000001 xx 'rcnWlq,1„ l i• h�l��V mr liii 1111111111;111111111111 1 1 4141 • IJ' iMomue��� w w�n"Itlw, 11, 1401 1111 a) t N O — V t Z U 13- 03 - o .G V 03 ._ `a c ,, = a, of c a)a0 aim 13 all— 03 -•� o a) $ Id t 0 0 c i0 6 �.c ~ 0 o'a1 0 t a) o � Q CA ct.) s o co 03 U 'oo�o C41 'his tis 0-a) o130 2 3 as 0 03 73M• a) it as co_046'0. C 0WN a. t •a) ol�. ...c .o Ian0 fl c fA i = as zE y O zf 2 i 114,4'4 ,,44,i4144,:411,411,111i' 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111 00000001,00000000 tiull,100000000000000004 11111111111111111111 111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 x1111) 444.441 1111111111 ,[111111111111h111111111114 ,11111111111111110 tto Cs ffi cd —To N1�plm �W qI IIIIIOIIIIu •rl AA) oll unT1.11111II0 74W1MIIII11111 MAllllpuuluu,' 1 p pi1,„ 11i 11111111 1011 CI) elm unnummunn (113 ill 4,44 1 , ice.. w lm. �mxim w6l;am. •u,"4 11 4- 91,1 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS Item No. 15 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: November and December 2010 Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department for the months of November and December, 2010. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 82 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations including 17 applications for public hearings during the months of November and December. Special Projects & Lonci Ramie Planninci Activities The Long Range Planning Division commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities currently in progress are described in the paragraphs below: • Temecula Regional Hospital — This project was approved by the City Council on January 22, 2008. On December 30, 2009 the applicant submitted an application for a one year extension of time and Council approved this extension on January 26, 2010, extending the approval until January 22, 2011. The applicant submitted a Major Modification application on June 18, 2010, to reduce the number of hospital beds in the first phase from 178 beds to 140 beds and to change the construction of the building from concrete to framed construction. A draft addendum to the EIR was received from our consultant, ESA, on August 13, 2010. Comments on the addendum to the EIR were provided to ESA on August 31, 2010. A technical review of traffic was completed on November 12, 2010 and a technical review of MTBE was completed on December 1, 2010. ESA provided a revised EIR Addendum on December 3, 2010. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended that the City Council approve the Major Modification application on December 15, 2010. Staff anticipates presenting the Modification application to the City Council at the February 8, 2011 hearing. (FISK) • SCE Triton Substation — On September 23, 2010, the CPUC approved SCE's permit to construct the Triton Substation. Director of Planning and Redevelopment, Patrick Richardson, attended and spoke at the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) meeting in San Francisco. In his presentation Mr. Richardson indicated that the City had actively objected to the Triton Substation since SCE introduced the project to the community in 2008. He further explained that Council and staff requested the CPUC and SCE to prepare a full Environmental Impact Report instead of the Mitigated Negative Declaration as the El R would require SCE to look at alternative sites, which could potentially avoid the need for 5 additional 80 -foot tall power poles. He concluded by stating to the Commission that impacts from the project in the areas of land use and aesthetics cannot be mitigated, therefore an EIR should be required. The Commission had no questions of Mr. Richardson or CPUC staff when it approved the Triton Substation on their consent calendar by a vote of 5-0. On October 29, 2010, City Attorney Ginetta Giovinco filed a re -hearing request with the CPUC on the basis that the CPUC erred in its' approval because the CEQA document prepared by CPUC staff was inadequate. The CPUC legal team denied the City's request, which was then appealed to the State Supreme Court and denied again. The City has exhausted its appeals with regard to the CEQA document. Staff will continue to monitor the project and try to minimize impacts during the construction process. (KITZEROW/PETERS) • The Green House Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory — The Green TAC selected 2007 as the base year for GHG emissions inventory analysis. Two inventories were prepared: 1) a municipal operations inventory and, 2) a communitywide inventory. The next steps are to select a target emission reduction and identify implementation measures that will achieve the selected target. The Green TAC established a test target of 15 percent below the 2007 base year. Staff is currently reviewing potential reduction measures to see if a 15 percent reduction in GHG emissions below baseline is feasible. (WEST) • Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program — The Residential Energy Efficiency Loan Program will make low interest loans available to low and moderate income homeowners to make energy efficient improvements. The Program allows for specific types of energy efficiency improvements based on the year of construction, which coincides with the changes to Energy Codes of the California Building Standards. The type of improvements allowed include but are not limited to: HVAC replacements, window replacements, additional attic insulation, and attic fans. The Residential Energy Efficiency Program will work in conjunction with the Redevelopment Agency Residential Improvement Program, which offers forgivable loans for general interior and exterior home improvements. The program was approved by the City Council on September 14, 2010 and staff has begun accepting applications to fund residential Energy Efficiency loans. (WEST) • Santa Margarita Area Annexation —The Santa Margarita Area (Annexation No. 2) was officially annexed into the City of Temecula jurisdiction on November 10, 2010. A separate LAFCO application is still pending; however, to remove a portion of the City of Temecula's existing Sphere of Influence. This separate application is a result of a condition of approval placed on the City by LAFCO to accommodate Granite Construction's request that their proposed Surface Mine Liberty Quarry application not be within the City's existing Sphere of Influence. Therefore, as a condition of approval of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2, a separate LAFCO application to reduce the City's existing Sphere of Influence was submitted by the City on July 19, 2010. LAFCO anticipates that the Staff Report for this sphere of influence modification application will be available on January 20, 2011 and that the application will be heard at the January 27, 2011 LAFCO meeting. (RICHARDSON/LOWREY) • Liberty Quarry Draft Environmental Impact Report — The County of Riverside has released the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Granite Construction's Liberty Quarry Surface Mining Permit, Change of Zone, and Noise Ordinance Exception. The project is a 75 -year land use permit for a rock quarry and associated aggregate processing facilities, hot mix asphalt plant, ready mix concrete plant, concrete and asphalt recycling facility, administration and employee buildings, a maintenance facility with diesel, gas and propane tanks, water tanks, natural gas fuel engines for electric power generation, water and gas lines, settling ponds, truck scales, and truck and equipment parking areas within a 414 acre -site located adjacent to the City's southwest boundary within the County of Riverside. The City reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report and provided comments to the County of Riverside on November 23, 2009. The City is awaiting a response to comments and/or revised and re- circulated EIR from the County. (RICHARDSON/LOWREY) • Jefferson Corridor Specific Plan — Staff is studying the Jefferson Avenue Corridor to create a Specific Plan for the area. The boundaries of the Jefferson Avenue Corridor are preliminarily defined to include all properties north of Rancho California Road, east of Diaz, south of the Murrieta City boundary and west of Interstate 1-15. In June, approximately 15 representatives of the Urban Land Institute (ULI) together with City Staff conducted a tour of the Jefferson Corridor. The ULI Technical Advisory Panel consists of design, architectural, engineering, retail, and planning experts and provided the City with an outside expert review of the Jefferson Avenue Corridor with land use recommendations. The ULI Technical Advisory Panel (TAP) held a one day planning summit in the Council Chambers on June 23, 2010, and shared their findings and recommendations with City staff. On September 23`tithe recommendations from the ULI Technical Advisory Panel were presented at a ULI Transit Oriented Development conference in Anaheim. This conference was intended to highlight the planning efforts being made throughout California in relation to the future high speed rail that will eventually connect San Diego to San Francisco. The City of Temecula was recognized, along with two other cities (San Diego and San Jose), for its future transportation planning efforts and ULI TAP process. Since the future high speed rail station will be located to the north of the Temecula boundary in Murrieta, the ULI TAP process provided a case study for a "station adjacent" community and focused on how future land use planning efforts within the Jefferson Avenue Corridor will take advantage of the proximity to the future high speed rail station. The ULI TAP recommendations have provided valuable information from a group of outstanding and diverse professionals. The recommendations from the study will set the foundation as the City embarks on our own planning effort for the Jefferson Avenue Corridor. Staff is currently drafting an "Existing Conditions Summary" for the project area. This report will outline baseline information for the corridor. (RICHARDSON/WEST/LOWREY/INNES) • SCAG 2012 Regional Transportation Plan — The update to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is underway. The RTP includes a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), which is a new component to the RTP as a result of the passage of SB 375. Staff will be working with the abovementioned agencies throughout the update process and has provided land use, employment and population data to SCAG and the County of Riverside Center for Demographic Research to establish Base Year Conditions and General Plan Based Growth Forecast/Distribution and land use for years 2020 and 2035. Staff is awaiting a response from SCAG staff regarding the land use data provided. SCAG and WRCOG will use this data to develop the Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) that achieves the greenhouse gas reductions targets envisioned by AB 32. The Regional Transportation Plan, including the SCS, is scheduled to be adopted by SCAG by November 2012. (WEST) • WRCOG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan — Staff is working with Western Riverside Council of Governments on a multi -jurisdictional backbone network of bike and pedestrian routes which will link transit and regional points of interest to local bicycle and multi -use trails. A draft plan was completed and presented to the WROCG Planning Directors on July 8, 2010. WRCOG is developing a model resolution for its member agencies to adopt the WRCOG Non -Motorized Transportation Plan. (WEST) • Caltrans Community Based Transportation Planning Grant — The City of Temecula was awarded $248,200 from Caltrans for a Community Based Transportation Planning grant. This grant will fund a multi -jurisdictional transportation corridor planning effort for the Jefferson Avenue Corridor. The Jefferson Avenue Corridor is a 16 -mile central north/south arterial that parallels the west side of Interstate 15. The City of Temecula is the lead agency and primary recipient of the grant funding. WRCOG is a sub -recipient for the purposes of administering the grant. The City of Murrieta, City of Wildomar and City of Lake Elsinore are grant participants. The Jefferson Avenue Corridor planning effort will promote public engagement, livable communities, and will address mobility, access and safety along the Jefferson Avenue Corridor. As a part of this effort, the City of Temecula will analyze affordable housing opportunities, and the opportunities and impacts of increased intensity and density, mixed-use development and impacts and opportunities related to the transportation network. The final product emerging as a result of this grant will be a "Multi - Jurisdictional Corridor Planning for the Jefferson Corridor" which is a 20 -year transportation plan for the Jefferson Corridor. The Caltrans Community Based Transportation Planning grant is anticipated to complement the U LI Technical Advisory Panel study completed for the Jefferson Avenue Corridor which focuses on future land use and transportation planning efforts related to the high speed rail alignment through the City of Temecula. (WEST/INN ES/LOWREY) Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 1. Recently Approved APN # 957340059 • PA10-0165 Roripaugh Security Trailer TUP CHERYL KITZEROW A Major Temporary Use Permit for a security trailer (RV-motorhome) and temporary power to the trailer, which will be parked in front of the Roripaugh Ranch Clubhouse located at Polo Creek Drive, Tract 29661-3 Submitted Date Approved Date May 28 2010 Nov 5 2010 APN # • PA10-0210 Lyndie Lane Zone Change 921310018 ERIC JONES A Zoning Amendment Application to change the zoning of a parcel located at 42210 Lyndie Lane from High Density Residential (H) to Community Commercial (CC). The site's current General Plan designation is Community Commercial (APN: 921-310-018). (Corresponding Application: PA10-0211 - Minor Modification) Submitted Date Approved Date Jul 13 2010 Dec 14 2010 • PA10-0223 St Catherine's TUP APN # 922080010 MATTHEW PETERS A Major Temporary Use Permit for St. Catherine of Alexandria 100 year Celebration on November 19-21, 2010 to include a mechanical bull, rock climbing wall, carnival rides, temporary tents, live entertainment, and food and alcohol will be provided. Submitted Date Approved Date Jul 19 2010 Nov 15 2010 • PA10-0275 Shell Car Wash Major Mod APN # 921760001 ERIC JONES A Major Modification Application to construct a 756 square foot self-service car wash at an existing Shell gas station located at 29750 Rancho California Road (APN 921-760-001). Related application PA10-0276. Submitted Date Approved Date Sep 15 2010 Dec 2 2010 • PA10-0276 Shell Major CUP APN # 921760001 ERIC JONES A Major Conditional Use Permit to allow a self serve car wash to be installed and operated at an existing Shell gas station located at 29750 Rancho California Road (APN 921-760-001). (Associated Application PA10-0275) Submitted Date Approved Date Sep 15 2010 Dec 2 2010 • PA10-0293 Call of Temecula Valley MCUP APN # 921020054 CHERYL KITZEROW A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the Call of Temecula Valley Church to locate in approximately 7,500 square feet of an existing industrial building located at 43234 Business Park Drive, Suites 105-107. Uses include a 2,233 square foot assembly area with non -fixed seating, kids rooms and administrative office space. Proposed hours of operation include Sunday service from 10 a.m. to noon and one weeknight service from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. (Associated Application PR10-0034) Submitted Date Approved Date 1 of 8 Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 Oct 82010 Dec 9 2010 • PA10-0302 Lowes Christmas tree lot APN # 910330011 ERIC JONES A Major Temporary Use permit to allow a Christmas Tree lot in the parking area of an existing Lowes from November 17 to December 23, located at 40390 Winchester Road (APN 910-330-011) Submitted Date Approved Date Oct 18 2010 Nov 3 2010 • PA10-0303 Support our Troops VII MTUP APN # 922120010 ERIC JONES A Major Temporary Use Permit for the Support our Troops VII Event at the Quaid Harley Davidson to include live entertainment on Saturday, December 4, 2010 from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Submitted Date Approved Date Oct 19 2010 Nov 15 2010 • PA10-0307 Tem. Dental Prac. Apprec TUP APN # 921320045 CHERYL KITZEROW A Major Temporary Use Permit for Temecula Dental Practice to hold a community appreciation/office relocation celebration event on November 20, 2010 from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. in the Temecula Town Center parking lot generally located at the northeast corner of Ynez and Rancho California Roads. The event will be located in the parking area (23 spaces) between the Mobil gas station and Temecula Dental building along Rancho California Road. The event will include complimentary food, Bounce House, DJ, and face painting. No alcohol will be provided. Submitted Date Approved Date Oct 21 2010 Nov 9 2010 • PA10-0308 Family Fall Festival Major TUP APN # 921320058 ERIC JONES A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow the 2010 Family Fall Festival to be located within the Temecula Town Center (27458 Ynez Road) on November 6th between the hours of 3 p.m. and 8 p.m. The festival will include live entertainment featuring an orchestra , dance performances and non -contact martial arts demonstrations. Food and business vendors will also be included. Submitted Date Approved Date Oct 21 2010 Nov 3 2010 • PA10-0311 Christmas Tree Lot APN # 922072013 ERIC JONES A Major Temporary Use Permit for a Christmas Tree Lot for Boy Scout Troup 384 to be in operation from November 30 -December 20 from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 9 a.m. to 11 p.m. Friday through Sunday, located on the vacant property immediately north of First Street and east of Old Town Front Street (APN: 922-072- 016; 013; 011; 010; 023). Submitted Date Approved Date Oct 25 2010 Nov 1 2010 APN # • PA10-0320 Steve's Towing Minor CUP 909290027 ERIC JONES A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow an existing towing facility located at 42620 Rio Nedo to have outdoor storage of vehicles. No external changes to the building or the site plan are proposed. 2 of 8 Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 • PA10-0321 Summerhouse Phase 1 MTUP APN # 959080025 DANA SCHUMA A Major Temporary Use Permit to use an existing parking lot and temporary driveway access off Dartolo Road for Phase 1 residents at Summerhouse located at 44155 Margarita Road. The temporary parking and access will be used until Phase 2 construction is complete. Submitted Date Approved Date Nov 2 2010 TBD 3 of 8 Submitted Date Approved Date Nov 1 2010 Dec 16 2010 • PA10-0321 Summerhouse Phase 1 MTUP APN # 959080025 DANA SCHUMA A Major Temporary Use Permit to use an existing parking lot and temporary driveway access off Dartolo Road for Phase 1 residents at Summerhouse located at 44155 Margarita Road. The temporary parking and access will be used until Phase 2 construction is complete. Submitted Date Approved Date Nov 2 2010 TBD 3 of 8 Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 2. Scheduled for Hearing APN # 957140012 • PA08-0241 Islamic Center DP ERIC JONES A Development Plan for a two story 24,943 square foot religious facility located at the southwest corner of Nicolas Road and Calle Colibri (APN 957-140-012), totaling 4.32 acres. The project will be constructed in two phases. (Related: Planning Application PA08-0242, Conditional Use Permit) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 14 2008 TBD • PA08-0242 Islamic Center CUP APN # 957140012 ERIC JONES A Conditional Use Permit to allow a 24,943 square foot religious facility to operate within a VL zone located on parcels 957-140-007 & 957-140-011. (Related Planning Application PA08-0241, Development Plan) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 14 2008 TBD • PA09-0246 Roripaugh Estates SPA#3 PA10 APN # 920100048 MATTHEW PETERS A Specific Plan Amendment (text only) to change the permitted uses/development standards for Planning Area 10 of the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan to the standards of the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district with the addition to permit automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash. Project proponent proposes future car wash at the existing Arco AM/PM at the southeast corner of Winchester & Nicolas Roads, addressed as 40212 Winchester Road. (Associated Applications PA09-0287 and PA09-0288) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Aug 4 2009 10/22/2009 Nov 3 2010 APN # • PA09-0287 Arco AM/PM Nicolas Car Wash 920100048 MATTHEW PETERS A Conditional Use Permit to construct a 946 square foot drive-thru car wash at the existing Arco AM/PM gas station at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Winchester Roads, addressed as 40212 Winchester Road. (Associated Applications PA09-0246 and PA09-0288) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Sep 22 2009 10/22/2009 Nov 3 2010 • PA10-0257 T -Mobile Redhawk Med APN # 960020042 ERIC JONES An Antenna Facility Application to allow cellular facility to be installed within the cupola of an existing structure that will be raised 4 feet at 44274 George Cushman Court (APN: 960-020-042) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Aug 31 2010 Feb 2 2011 APN # • PA10-0337 T -Mobile Major Mod 960020042 ERIC JONES A Major Modification Application to allow an existing cupola located at 44274 George Cushman Court (APN: 960- 020-042) to be raised four feet . The extra height will make room for a proposed building integrated cellular telecommunication facility (Related application: PA10-0257) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision 4 of 8 Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 Nov 23 2010 Feb 2 2011 5 of 8 Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 3. New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting APN # • PA10-0213 Simms TTM 945120001 ERIC JONES A Tentative Tract Map application to create 15 residential lots located approximately 1,500 feet east of Santiago and Ynez Road. Lots will range in size from 1.31 - 2.80 acres. Related Case PA10-0214. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 14 2010 8/12/2010 TBD • PA10-0214 Simms Zoning & GPA APN # 945120001 ERIC JONES A Zoning Map and Land Use Map Amendment application. Current zoning and General Plan designation is Very Low Residential. Proposed zoning and General Plan designation is L-1 (Low Density Residential). The project is located approximately 1,500 east of the Santiago and Ynez Road intersection (related application PA10-0213) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 14 2010 8/12/2010 TBD • PA10-0297 Cycling Event APN # 909370002 CHRISTINE DAMKO A Special Event Permit for a cycling event on March 6, 2011 from 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. located on a 1.3 mile circle around Diaz Road, Dendy Parkway and Remington Avenue. No formal street closures required. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 13 2010 TBD • PA10-0309 High Gate Dev. Plan APN # 944290025 ERIC JONES A two phase Development Plan Application for a three story 98,970 square foot senior congregate care facility generally located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road (APN: 944-290-026). The project features 72 units consisting of studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom apartments as well as a courtyard. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 21 2010 11/18/2010 TBD • PA10-0317 Mtn. View Community Church CUP APN # 910281001 MATTHEW PETERS A Minor Conditional Use Permit for Mountain View Community Church to operate in a Service Commercial (SC) zone and occupy approximately 101,619 square feet of an existing building next to Gold's Gym located at 29201 Ynez Road (APN 910-281-001). Related cases PR10-0025 and PA10-0318. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 29 2010 TBD • PA10-0322 7-11 PCN for Type 21 APN # 910281003 MATTHEW PETERS A Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity application for a Type 21 (off -sale beer, wine and distilled spirits) at the 7-11 convenience store occupying 3,016 square feet of retail located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Ynez Roads, addressed as 41125 Winchester Road, Suite A3. APN 909-200-040 & 041 Related Cases: PA10- 0288, PA09-0156 and PA09-0157 Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Nov 2 2010 TBD 6 of 8 Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 • PA10-0323 Paseo del Sol Reserve HPR (SP) APN # 961440014 CHERYL KITZEROW A Residential Home Product Review for 100 lots in Tract 24188-3 in Paseo del Sol. Three floor plans ranging in size from 2,875 to 3,360 square feet with three elevations each (Spanish, Tuscany, Italian) will be constructed by Standard Pacific. Lot sizes range from 7,200 to 14,000 square feet. Project site is locate at the southwest corner of Pauba Road and Butterfield Stage Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Nov 5 2010 TBD APN # • PA10-0333 Harveston Emery2 Models 916410001 CHERYL KITZEROW A Model Home Complex TUP for Harveston's Emery Place 2 Lots 1-4 at the northeast corner of Date Street and Lakeview Road (Product review PA10-0073) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Nov 19 2010 TBD • PA10-0335 APN # Golds Gym Minor CUP 954030002 ERIC JONES A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow a gym to be located within an existing commercial center (Meadows Village) at 31771 Rancho California Road (APN: 954-030-002) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Nov 22 2010 TBD • PA10-0347 Linfield PDO Amd APN # 955020006 ERIC JONES A Land Use Amendment application to amend PDO -7 for Linfield Christian School. Revisions will include the addition of senior housing density requirements and a revision to the PDO Planning Area Map. Located at 31950 Pauba Road (Related Applications PA10-0348 Tentative Parcel Map and PA10-0349 Major Modification) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Dec 15 2010 TBD • PA10-0348 Linfield TTM APN # 955020002 ERIC JONES A Tentative Map application (for conveyance purposes) to allow Linfield Christian School to create four additional parcels. Total parcels within the school property will equal eight. Parcels will range in size between 2.52 - 6.63 acres. Located at 31950 Pauba Road. (Related Applications PA10-0349: Major Mod and PA10-0347 PDO Amendment) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Dec 15 2010 TBD • PA10-0349 Linfield Major Mod APN # 955020002 ERIC JONES A Major Modification to a previously approved CUP for Linfield Christian School. Modifications include revisions to the approved site plan and the addition of new facilities for the school. Located at 31950 Pauba Road (Related applications PA10-0348 Tentative Track Map and PA10-0347 PDO Amendment) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Dec 15 2010 TBD 7 of 8 Planning Agenda Report 11/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 • PA10-0352 SJVC Minor CUP APN # 910272005 ERIC JONES A Minor Conditional Use Permit application to allow San Joaquin Valley College to operate in an existing structure within an area zoned Service Commercial. The project is located at 27270 Madison Avenue (APN: 910-272-005) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Dec 23 2010 TBD • PA11-0001 Promenade Carnival Feb MTUP APN # 910420005 MATTHEW PETERS A Major Temporary Use Permit to conduct a carnival at the Promenade Mall west parking lot from February 17 through February 20, 2011 featuring rides, food, and games of chance Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jan 3 2011 TBD • PA11-0006 Spirit Run For the Arts APN # 962020009 CHRISTINE DAMKO A Major Temporary Use Permit for Spirit Run For The Arts a local 5K and 10K foot race beginning and ending at Great Oak High School located at 32555 Deer Hollow Way, Temecula, Ca. 92592 on March 13, 2011 from 6:00 am until 12:00 pm with an extimated daily attendance of 500-1000 people. Minimal food items of bananas, oranges and water will be served after the race. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jan 5 2011 TBD 8 of 8 1 1 s4 if*•I • 9� Planning Status November/December 2010 .,•,., ••N., •,I• • `•. I U 1. Recently Approved U 2. Scheduled for Hearing on 3. New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting 1741,EC"LA e Item No. 16 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager 0/ -e -r - fie. Oa, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager DATE: January 25, 2010 SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report - December 2010 PREPARED BY: Sue Steffen, Executive Assistant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file On November 30, 2010 Mayor Ron Roberts traveled to Denver, Colorado to attend the National League of Cities' Congress of Cities Conference and Exposition. Attachment: Meeting Agendas 0 E 0 0 0 u 0 0 vonload Conference �L ruc Ecu 2 m c w c ro E o < C La O •a-' t3 40 cu C d ra m Y ro a) a icr, a) C V 0 Q< O 0 ea E Q.T U ea [3t r3 a.+ CO 0 C Cit 5, i.. s4.+ a) o .f] a 4 c a) G1 "p3. a) 0 > a v Q o fli V N rn. ° C rC5 0.4 02 ma3 ea 0 2 ii CO 03 01 LS o Rs cu E r)c a) " O drt, UU, - .474- a) " GJ cr4 0.) citate. LisN -� TS -0 0 0 U a) '' 0 t�4) 13 0.1 (n 2 In E Er, ro@ c ca a LF,(1) a) a CU — 0 ,0 1-. �� a) -0 ul o 4_, Leis E -49 , t. -0 a) -SC co o U j 6a O0Q.9 C p i4""20 '40 Gr3 a p7.E cas Ea..xac c o B E u E a) 0a) as nC Le)o rcsr IP ��'—vav"a o E co D 2 eu 4 . to 5xp ow a) cr, 0 e-. 0) L io 2 "C ' p N .Fi a` O , Q o L7 rci s & Exposition programming is currently available. Click to 0 0 • 0 EXPOSITION/congressprogram.aspx EVENTS/CONGRESS OF CITIES http://www,nle.org/CONFERENCES 2010 Congress of Cities Program Overview cs ,1 Era a)Ea 0 0 — �a o. E o � c 0 Z Q3 - V )-03 'U iJ .� 0 0,1 C.) y UCO 0 a) 0 N O ID U U 0 a) U u- VI 01 'a U as ed ata C sngsess �t 3 E 2 a qwa Skip to Main Conference Activities Skip to Pre -Conference Act a) 2 ® 0 in8 .0 G 0 T ' X o E a L L tea° aa, I ; 6 L w E '.0 ro 0 a, 01° -ii a3 ro -cs a, a) a, E E : _a o0. u ? -0 c 0 al CD a, u _ y a 0 o LI U U .0 0 0 v = E 0_ CI I ul u .IC .. a) U D, a E m U o o () j V N ? - - C� 01 O U u C a Ili Oa, 01 [n a, Q., N a. .s=+ a, 0 Zi V ® MI 0 O ttr) iv i Tg 'iw CTI u u a o L- Q g ) :u ID iV aa) O- OE a) "" -p GS v I-- 0 a3 1- CI.. To learn more about the Youth Delegate Agenda, 7:00 AM - 6:00 PM Leadership Training Institute Informatin Desk 7 :00 AM - 9 :00 PM Hotel Shuttle Bus Schedule 7 :30 AM - 9 :00 AM Women in Municipal Government (WIMG) Nominations Meeting 7 :30 AM - 8 :00 PM Registration 7:30 AM - 8:00 PM NLC Store ID E u Ll ro 0 0 CL. Oe 0 4) E c a) 0 co 01 0 CO .E V C tL 0 0 z Human Development (HD) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 0 0 9 :00 AM - Noon Information Technology and Communications (ITC) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 11/18/2010 ON/congr essprogram. aspx Page 3 of 13 2010 Congress of Cities Program Overview For full -descriptions of LTI Seminars, 9 :00 AM - Noon Mobile Workshop: National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 :00 AM - Noon Mobile Workshop: Smaller Cities Development of Sports, Event, and Community Venues 9 :00 AM - Noon Mobile Workshop: Providing Sustainable Recycling Solutions through a Public/Private Partnerships 9 :00 AM - 12:30 PM Spouse/Guest Tour: Behind the Scenes of Denver's Sports Gems: Coors Field & INVESCO Field 9 :00 AM - 5 :00 PM NLC Board of Directors Meeting 10:00 AM - 10:45 AM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Nominating Committee Hearing 10:00 AM - 4 :00 PM NLC Advisory Council Meeting 10:00 AM - 8:00 PM NLC Bookstore by Barnes & Noble Noon - 1 :00 PM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) New Member Orientation Noon- 1 :30 PM LTI: Leadership Luncheon Noon - 1 :30 PM Women in Municipal Government (WIMG) Board of Directors Meeting 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: FasTracks Transit System & TOD, (Transit Oriented Development) 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Re -use of Major Facilities; Lovvey, Stapleton and Fitzsimons 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Scientific Cultural Facilities District, (SCFD) 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: The U.S. 36 Multi -Modal Transportation Project and Corridor Coalition , Event and Community Venues 1:00 PM - 4:00 PM Mobile Workshop: Smaller Cities Development of Spo 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Transportation Infrastructure and Services (TIS) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Public Safety and Crime Prevention (PSCP) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Community and Economic Development (CED) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Energy, Environment and Natural Resources (EENR) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting EXPOSITION/congressprograrn.aspx 'S/CONGRESS OF CITIES Page 4 of 13 0 Congress of Cities Program Overvi For full -descriptions of LTI Seminars, d 2 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Corporate Partners Leadership Council Meeting 2 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Hispanic Elected Local Officials (HELD) Nominating Committee and Board of Directors Meetings 10 1) c c c.� 0 .10 ra ea 0 0 vi at m 0 0 a 10 10 cn c 0 cn 1 Q 6n 5 :00 PM - 6 :30 PM League of Minnesota Cities Reception 5 :45 PM - 7 :30 PM National Black Caucus of Loca! Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Board of Directors Meeting 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM NLC Gift Shop 6 :30 PM - 8 :00 PM Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Local Officials (GLBTO) Reception 1,41 0 El 7 :00 AM - 8 :30 AM Small Cities Council Steering Committee Breakfast 7 :00 AM - 5 :30 PM Registration 7:00 AM - 5:30 PM NLC Gift Shop 7 :00 AM - 6 :00 PM Enterprise Programs Showcase and Briefing Room 7 :30 AM - 8 :30 AM Louisiana Municipal Association Delegates' Breakfast 7 :30 AM - 8 :45 AM First Tier Suburbs Steering Committee Breakfast 7 :30 AM - 8 :45 AM Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Local Officials (GLBTO) Business Meeting 7 :30 AM - 8 :45 AM UCC Steering Committee Meeting CO 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM Host City Hospitality Lounge 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM NLC Bookstore by Barnes and Noble 8 :00 AM - 6 :00 PM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Welcome Center EXPOSIT[ON/congressprogramaaspx EVENTS/CONGRESS OFCITIES 0 Congress of Cities Program Overview C;) Policy Committee Meeting u 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO 11:00 AM - 1 :00 PM Council on Youth, Education and Families Meeting 1.4ris Luncheon - 1 ;00 PM Exposition 11:00 AM - 1 :00 PM Youth Delegates Orientation 11:00 AM - 4 :00 PM Spouse/Guest Tour: Amazing Natural Wonders & A World -Famous Brew 11:00 AM - 5 .00 PM ExptosMon Open 11:15 AM - 12:45 PM Small Cities Council Lunch 11:30 AM - 1 :30 PM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Membership Luncheon and Awards Program 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM Exhibitor Solutions Theater: Migration - Future Proofing Your Home 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM Exhibitor Solutions Theater: Home Fire Sprinklers: Protecting Your Community 1 :00 PM - 2 :30 PM Asian Pan American Municipal Officials (APAMO) Business Meeting For workshop ziescriptson$ and confirmed speakem, click here 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: National Renewable Energy Laboratory ca. CO 2 00a 0 cr) 01 a) a) rta ,rn 0 0. 0 0 w .0 0 a_ ca. cr? 41- c " 0. 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Re -use of Major Facilities; Lowry, Stapleton and Fitzsimons P*, c.org/CONFERENCES Workshop: River Vision Implementation Plan,(RVIP) 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mob 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Scientific Cultural Facilities District, (SCFD) s Development of Sports, Event and Community Venues 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Smaller Ci 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: The U.S. 36 Mufti -Modal Transportation Project and Corridor Coalition u 0 —may 0 c u 0 _0 ns 00 u a) E ro 0 T.) u 2 LI m= u a cn 0 ccn cc.) D a. _c co in I-- 0) 0 aS a 0 E 0 : c LI a LE S c O 0) I0 0 03 ID 0 C_ _A CY r9 o F- 2 o i,.: ae c 4, 2 0 0) v ? a) _ 1-- E c c 0 o (0) 0 0 VI 0 v CD v0i '�` in aa) 0 , c v, O 0 c`q 0 r,=• E o 5 cx x k LL I>< 2 Q 5 5 c 5 irt. Q, El co W,,. r,g CD a Ln ]n u7 C7 �r 'a cr M N 0 Fv a 5 ° 5 ca. -° CD 0) 0 a 0 tn r Z iNi V) ni 3 :15 PM - 4 :45 PM UCC Membership Meeting a E U a E as 5 0) as rn 01 c 0) m 5 0) tZ v .0E as 2 0 SL] v m _u 0 0 0 i a!i w m d a its c 2 a. 0a CD, a 4:00 PM - 4:45 PM Exhibitor Solutions Theater: Learn What GPS, First Responders and Your Car Have 4 :00 PM - 6 :00 PM Nominating Committee Hearing 4 :30 PM - 6 :00 PM International Council Meeting 4 :30 PM - 6 :00 PM Youth and Elected Leaders 0' :2 03 2 03 0) 0) 2 5 5 :30 PM - 6 :30 PM Virginia Municipal League Reception cwt cc E L 0.0 0 as bA 0 z 0 0 I W H 0 0 0z cdo z z Lxd O r ? 3 0 Cd 2010 Congress of Cities Program Overview 5:30 PM - 7:00 PM Colorado Municipal League Reception 5 :30 PM - 7 :00 PM League of Kansas Municipalities/Missouri Municipal League Reception 6 :00 PM - 7 :30 PM Florida League of Cities Reception 6 :00 PM - 7 :30 PM League of Arizona Cities and Towns Reception 6 :00 PM - 7 :30 PM North Carolina League of Municipalities Reception 6 :00 PM - 7 :30 PM Texas Municipal League Reception 6 :30 PM - 7 :30 PM Tennessee Municipal League Reception 8 :00 PM - 9 :30 PM Joint Constituency Group Reception (APAMO-HELO-WIMG) 0) 5 Fa 205558 7 :00 AM - 12:00 PM NLC Nominating Committee Meeting 7:00 AM - 2:00 PM NLC Gift Shop 7 :00 AM - 5 :00 PM Registration 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM Hotel Shuttle Bus 7 :00 AM - 6 :00 PM Enterprise Programs Showcase and Briefing Room 7 :30 AM - 8 :30 AM Bank on Cities Breakfast 7 :30 AM - 8 :45 AM State Municipal League Presidents and Executive Directors Breakfast 8 :00 AM - 6 :00 PM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Welcome Center ck here Pm 10;15 AM 11,;00 AM Break in Exposition 1015 AM - NOON Expositor4Open .tr Z cE5 a) .,—. (=> 0 Congress of Cities Program Overview 11:00 AM- 1 45 PM City Futures Panel on Democratic Governance E c. cu Tri 5 -o E E 3 0 '3) o_ 0 2 c? 11;00 AM - 2 :00 PM CityFutures Pane! on Public Finance 11:00 AM - 2 ;00 PM Youth Forum 11:00 AM - 5 :00 PM Spouse/Guest Tour: Shop, Taste & Tour the Best of Boulder 11:00 AM - 5 :00 PM Spouse/Guest Tour: Shopping Shuttle to Cherry Creek Noon - 12:45 p.m. Exhibitor Solutions Theater: Increase Revenues with No Capita! Expense ork (APAN) Luncheon Meeting NOON - 2 ;00 PM Afterschoo! Policy Advisors Ne 1230 PM - 2 i.00 PM Delegates Lunch Break OR Special Lunch Opportunities 12:30 PM - 2100 PM Special Lunch Oppoitturales— i,linVlii click here, ,tf: 12:30 P14 - 2 :00 PM Women in Municipal Government (WIMG) Luncheon and Membership Meeting with Award Program 1 :00 PM - 3 ;15 PM Western Municipal Association 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: FasTracks Transit System & TOD, (Transit Oriented Development) 1 :00 PM - 4 ;00 PM Mobile Workshop: Providing Sustainable Recycling Solutions through a Public/Private Partnerships 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Re -use of Major Facilities; Lowry, Stapleton and Fitzsimons 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: River Vision Implementation Plan,(RVIP) 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Scientific Cultural Facilities District, (SCFD) EXPOSITION/congressprogram.aspx 0 tr) 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM Exhibitor Solutions Theater: Better Quality of Life Through Real -Time Adaptive Traffic Cont 0" 2 0 w u Ul Trs L) 0 LTJ u 0 L) "X 0 U 17:6 .475 Z r4-1 u1 5 :00 PM - 6 :30 PM State Municipal League Presidents Reception 5 :30 PM - 6 :30 PM League of Alabama Cities Reception 7 :00 PM - 10:00 PM Youth Delegate Social Event 7 :30 PM - 9 :30 PM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Evening Out ember 7 :00 AM - 2 :00 PM Cyber Cafe 7 :00 AM - 2 :00 PM Registration 7 :30 AM - 8 :30 AM Legal Advisory Council Meeting 7 :30 AM - 8 :45 AN1NLC Leadership Group Chairs Breakfast EXPOSITION/congressprogram.aspx EVF,NTS/CONGRESS OF CITIES tp://www.nic.org/CONEERENCES 2010 Congress ofCities Program Ove: 7 :30 AM - 6 :00 PM NLC Policy Office 8 :00 AM - 2 :00 PM Host City Information Booth 8 :00 AM - 5 :00 PM State Municipal League Staff Headquarters 8 :00 AM - 5 :30 PM NLC Press/Media Office 8 :00 AM - 6 :00 PM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Welcome Center 10:45 AM - 12:00 PM Youth Wrap Up Event ra a) 0 0 0 N LL1 0 LU 23 o 0 () ft) Uu 0 0 00 ro„ r,1 12:30 PM - 1 :30 PM National Annual Business Meeting 0_ 6..,04) - 9 ;30 PM Host City Closing Event 2:00 PM - 6:00 PM Hotel Shuttle Bus Service 3 :00 PM - 5 :00 PM Denver Information Center 3 :00 PM - 5 :00 PM Registration 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM NLC Store 7:00 AM - 6:00 PM Hotel Shuttle Bus Service 0 E 0 0 0) . 0 1— Sa LE ,f) cu 0) 173 0) c. c=, <IC 7 :30 AM - 6 :00 PM Registration 7:30 AM - 6:00 PM NLC Store 8 :00 AM - 5 :00 PM Denver Information Center Page 11 of 13 2010 Congress of Cities Program Overview For full -descriptions of at Seminars, dick L) 0 = o III m r0 1,'..!: a) u z....: ..yi rl ..., .....,',..-.. ..,-,.. ) ....'..,:,=. ':..;: ..:'...,:. . . ..;',... :.;•::, ± C-) 7-n ..-- al z ,....., un {....; .1!.......7,. 0 :......,„7. a) L) a..) 4‘....) ..,.',":-. i.....': ...'....:.. -,'.,a 0 -.......-,: ...,)".. .-;':.-. 4-.. ..--.J 0 t.▪ ) - c....:.'..:,.i., .„, „:.!..-i. ..„ . ..„. no , .. . . ,-,,f.,..... ,,.:,,,,. ,,,,•....;) ,:..)..., ).:).:., .,-.,) ra rn ',. --.1. 7 :00 AM - 6 :00 PM Leadership Training Institute Information Desk 7 :00 AM - 9 :00 PM Hotel Shuttle Bus Schedule 7 :30 AM - 9 :00 AM Women in Municipal Government (WIMG) Nominations Meeting 7 :30 AM - 8 :00 PM Registration 7:30 AM - 8:00 PM NLC Store 9 :00 AM - Noon Information Technology and Communications (ITC) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting -descriptions of LTI Seminars, Ock N (X) 1•^.-1 ://www.nle.org/CONFERENCES Page 2 of 13 0 0_ ...E. ILI el C t i, = C CV CU 10 > .> C -._,... 0 E - E .= n_ -..n.. o c ..= a) m 2 1 --- LU = 0 O 0 a V) vs ca .7.1. 0 ,_ O c t--- . ,. ,..., 2 a) o a.) .-,. ".,,' -a-) --,d • 0 0 a..) 0 4-, E tr) 0 V) Ce 0) =F., = 't-:$ 76 r 5 ! 0 E o z u) L .. a ..,..',..",- 2 o 0 T vl ▪ IP -Y 0 0 0 2 IL • Z ;.-..1 0 00 ;.---. ;,•...• 8 0 0 ,--;. 0 0 ,..,-. z a z E 0 co 6., 0, . 0 ...1 ,.--1 ,..") .,.... .4.-. ..— c) 9 :00 AM - 12:30 PM Spouse/Guest Tour: Behind the Scenes of Denver's Sports Gems: Coors Field & INVESCO Field z 0 0 0 7 o 0 0 0 0 0 0)0 tn. 0 1.11 C, cr, N 2 0", 0 9 :00 AM - 5 :00 PM NLC Board of Directors Meeting 0 0 E 0) 2 0 0 0 0 LLI 0 0 0 0 k..r1 7-1 10:00 AM - 4 :00 PM NLC Advisory Council Meeting 10:00 AM - 8:00 PM NLC Bookstore by Barnes & Noble 0 0 ."2 0 0 0 2 0z 0 Lu 're (I) CC) 0 0 rtj _J 0 0 cz, Noon- 1 :30 PM LTI: Leadership Luncheon Noon - 1 :30 PM Women in Municipal Government (WIMG) Board of Directors Meeting 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: FasTracks Transit System & TOD, (Transit Oriented Development) :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Re -use of Major Facilities; Lowry, Stapleton and Fitzsimons 1 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Mobile Workshop: Scientific Cultural Facilities District, (SCFD) 0 0 00 0 0 O 11. 0 0 0 00_ 0 10 5 %.0 0 25 2 0 00 0 7 11.1 o_ 0 0 cu> 0 0 0 0- 0- 0' 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Transportation Infrastructure and Services (TIS) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Public Safety and Crime Prevention (PSCP) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Community and Economic Development (CED) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting 1 :30 PM - 4:30 PM Energy, Environment and Natural Resources (EENR) Policy and Advocacy Committee Meeting For full -descriptions of LTI Seminars, dick here. 11/18/2010 EXPOSITION/congressprograrn.aspx z LL1 2010 Congress of Cities Program Overview 2 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Corporate Partners Leadership Council Meeting 2 :00 PM - 4 :00 PM Hispanic Elected Local Officials (HELO) Nominating Committee and Board of Directors Meetings 5 :00 PM - 6 :15 PM Informational Session on Waterways, Ports and Landside Connections 5 :00 PM - 6 :30 PM League of Minnesota Cities Reception 5 :45 PM - 7 :30 PM National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials (NBC -LEO) Board of Directors Meeting National League of Cities TION/congressprogram. aspx 0 EVENTS/CONGR.ESS OF CITIES latp://www.nle.org/CONFERENCES 1:30 p.m. TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES POLICY AND ADVOCACY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA NLC Congress of Cities and Exposition Colorado Convention Center Room 503 Denver, Colorado Wednesday, December 1, 2010 1:30 p.m. — 4:30 p.m. WELCOME, INTRODUCTIONS AND MEETING OVERVIEW • Steve Elkins, Chair Council Member, Bloomington, Minnesota 1:40 p.m. CHAIR'S REPORT • Steve Elkins, Chair Council Member, Bloomington, Minnesota The Chair will update the Committee on the Steering Committee's work, including its Governance Project discussion, and its recommendations for policy amendments and resolutions. Additional Materials 1:55 p.m. FEDERAL RELATIONS UPDATE • Leslie Wollack Program Director for Infrastructure and Sustainability 2:10 p.m. CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS • Robert C. Wunderlich Senior Managing Director for Transportation/Engineering, Garland, Texas; President -Elect, Institute for Transportation Engineers The Committee will hear more about the Institute for Transportation Engineers' Context Sensitive Solutions guide for designing communities. 2:40 p.m. MOBILITY MANAGEMENT STUDY • Robert Stanley Mobility Management Research Manager, American Public Transportation Association (APTA) The Committee will learn more about ways in which APTA can work with cities to maintain their transportation systems. 3:00 p.m. PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL , PP. 5-14 MUNICIPAL POLICY The Committee will consider the Steering Committee's proposed recommendations for renewing or amending resolutions, or incorporating them into existing policy. Proposals for additional resolutions or policy amendments will also be in order. 3:25 p.m. Move to Rooms 505, 506 & 507 3 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES POLICY AND ADVOCACY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 3:30 p.m. JOINT MEETING WITH COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES POLICY AND ADVOCACY COMMITTEES • Moderator: Peggy Neely Council Member, Phoenix, Arizona; NLC Representative to the National Association of Regional Councils Facilitated discussion on regional planning issues. 4:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT 4 Item No. 17 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City ManagerOOL Ole -r- 46 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the attached Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Reports for the months of November and December, 2010. MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Supervlso DATE: December 7, 2010, 2010 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - November, 2010 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of November, 2010: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired D. Banners Replaced II, TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 19 6 31 92 28 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 2.379 B. Total Tons 70 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 235 B. Down Spouts 24 C. Under sidewalks 196 D. Bridge Drains 23 E. Bowls 4 V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0 VI.' GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 89 B. Total S.F. 2.052 VII. STENCILING A. 8 New and repainted legends B. 0 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 151 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic R: SMAINTAI NSMOACTRPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 52 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 61 service order requests for the month of October. 2010 The Maintenance Crew has also put in 50 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of November, 2010 was $179,433.09 compared to $64,799.00 for the month of October, 2010. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 Electronic Copies: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer $ 167,859.09 $ 9,750.00 $ 1,824.44 Capital Improvements Land Development Traffic Division RAMAINTAIMMOACTRFT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of November, 2010 DATE ACCOUNT. STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST . SIZE CONTRACTOR: WEST COAST ARBORISTS, IN Date: 11/05/10 CITYWIDE TREE REMOVAL TOTAL COST $ 1,872.00 Date: 11/01/10 CITYWIDE TREE TRIM, TREE REMOVAL TOTAL COST $ 2,386.00 CONTRACT()R....: ......IMPERIAL PAVING Date: 11/10/10 VIA LA VIDA ROAD REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED ASPHALT TOTAL COST $ 12,783.00 CONTRACTOR. PACIFIC STRIPING, INC. Date: 11/03/10 CITYWIDE RESTRIPED ALL ROADS "FALL CYCLE" TOTAL COST $ 149,958.09 CONTRACTOR. RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT, Date: 11/08/10 CITYWIDE CHANNELS APPLICATION OF "AGUA MASTER" TRASH AND DEBRIS REMOVAL TOTAL COST $ 9,750.00 CONTRACTOR BECKER ENGINEERING Date: 11/16/10 28663 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REPLACED MISSING HANDICAP HAND RAIL 'TOTAL COST $ 860.00 CONTRACTOR REPUBLIC ELECTRIC Date: 11/05/10 "OLD TOWN" REPAIRED ALL BURNT OUT STREET LAMPS TOTAL COST $ 1,824.44 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 9,750.00 $167,859.09 $ 1,824.44 R:1MAI NTAINIMOACTRPT RODNEY TIDWELL YEAR TO•DATE 18,000 0 18 $79 ass nn 0 0 SO ) CO-_ e }CNI : i 0 0 = . C13- ° m co m`( CO w = w - . . - . . \ CONTRACTORS,... ;.,; j�?LY AtJG 13T sE� , SEPTEMBER,_,_ ACT,OBER , NOVEMBER DECEMBER Asphalt Square Feet 0 0 0 14,000 4,000 Concrete Square Feet 0 0 0 0 0 Drainage Channels 0 8 0 2 8 TOTAL COSTS $0.00 57,300.00 50.00 546,295.00 $22,553.00 CONTRACT STRIPING Striping Linear Feet 0 0 0 0 2,254,489 Sandblasting Linear Feet 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL COSTS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $149,958.09 TREE CONTRACTORS Trees Trimmed 55 0 5 0 2 Trees Removed 0 0 . 0 0 17 TOTAL COSTS $2,750.00 $0.00 51,800.00 $0.00 54,258.00 R.O.W. SPRAYING SQ. FT. 0 0 187,000 0 0 TOTAL COSTS $0.00 $0.00 $10 455.00 50.00 50.00 CITY MAINTENANCE CREW Banners 92 75 184 92 92 Signs Replaced 91 47 47 34 19 Signs Installed 6 13 7 9 6 Signs Repaired 141 121 88 80 31 Catch Basins Cleaned 215 246 197 372 482 Trees Trimmed 105 101 141 101 28 R.O.W. Weed Abatement 1,380 100 0 0 0 New & Repainted Legends 306 381 784 449 159 After Hours Call Outs 145 72.5 98 168 50 Service Order Requests 98 86 73 61 52 Graffiti Removal - Sg Ft 2,779 2,840 4,115 4,471 2,052 TOTAL COSTS 52,750.00 57,300.00 512,255.00 546,295.00 5176,769.09 0 1- CG: 10 0) N 1— <: o 0n W ::r3 a g >' E N0 00 0) 0 0� 0C 0D CA S tli CO l y 't O r 14) M)) d VC N cts f!! � N M t- 03 ER 0▪ 1 y� ER 49 ER CO CO Aci sr; O N r• 0 4747 COCO CZ a)) er CO Qco om) ENr R soA ER :2 a, .. V1 -.c0..< rm }, 0—W' 00 v,,,.. (1) 7 0) Q xa; W 0u- €0) iio �.`. N.W x 0.- LL N 0 0 z 0 co 0 co re • I Y I- T re Q O Ui Q N O z ' 0 LC • } W O m I F C oi LL>2 xa 0 o LL. LU .J WQ .0O x 2 6- N LL — Q Q ag LLL 0 3 0 ASPHALT AC O O O O3 3 0 0 00 EA- ER0 0 0 0 0 0 O DER 03 0 0 N co -0 re 2 Q 0 LWIL Ll) 0 x Vin. H • N H cd CO D 0 J 3 0 STRIPING LINEAR FEET: 71. O 0 0 O N 10 N IN-HOUSE PAINTING LEGENDS: 0 0 0 0 10 N CO 00) CO 0 CO CO 6N) h r Cp 01 'c-� tri N' r4R rr ER ER ER rr 03 69, ER 0 UJ SIGNS REPLACED 0) 0 CO 1- CO ER g .L � J SIGNS INSTALLED O 'C) O 0 160') ER iE4 CD 0 to ClER SIGNS REPAIRED M co N '0) 0 N Square Footage: CO 0 04 O 0 a) 0) O O ti N ti ✓ s so u3 N CO CO CO 01 O O M A O 1D ✓ r CO CO 0) CD ER T 49 EA N N 0 0) N M CC C CO CCI 0 LL! 0 a J 0 J z x 0 W z 0 IN-HOUSE TREES TRIMMED: SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS: N LO lD AFTER HOURS CALL OUTS_ CD N N N N '11,3 so ER 0) 0) 0 O O O 0 O $181,414.80 CO A lA N ti '0 4H CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2010 R:1MAINTAINL W KCMPLTDIASPHALT,RPR Or6 r ms jS .:__,_. :� - -,..-:-A-7:4-:::-......: »a rnsecerr .""a ... 11/01/10 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT COSMIC R & R 120 10 11/02/10 43513 RIDGE PARK R & R 130 3.5 11/03/10 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT COSMIC R & R 351 10 11/09/10 MIRA LOMA AT RANCHO VISTA R & R 215 6 RAINBOW CANYON E/P 20 11/10/10 MIRA LOMA AT RANCHO VISTA R & R 505 15 11/16/10 MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER R & R 156 6 VINCENT MORAGA AT FELIX VALDEZ POTHOLE 4 11/17/10 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT TEMECULA PARKWAY R & R 290 11.5 11/18/10 3RD STREET AC OIL 220 RANCHO VISTA AC OIL 30 RAINBOW CANYON AC OIL 15 2.5 11/19/10 CITYWIDE POTHOLES 8 TEMP 11/22/10 28975 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET POTHOLES 2 TEMP RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ POTHOLES 5 TEMP 11/24/10 NICOLAS ROAD POTHOLES 18 TEMP 11/29/10 CITYWIDE POTHOLES 154 .5 11/30/10 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AT NORTH ARCH R & R 96 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AT SANTIAGO R & R 40 5 TOTAL S.F. TOTAL TONS OF REPAIRS 2.379 70 R:1MAINTAINL W KCMPLTDIASPHALT,RPR CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2010 -:: 7, ,,,.. ,,,-,-A: - F17,:AR ; v t '-''' -- 'j4: -- 7.. . -1:=-- -.,' ••.: ' ''''" :7 j—'-15-47-+- --, ' 17,::: -7" - ,,_ , ,, „,.....,-.,••_•,. „ .. • lskm......4K6,:57,.: zittiw...:: :. . 7i:71,itiVi- ima--"A7r:7,1.+" ' 4 1V„, .,— - •q. _,,,,' .* _:,/.: ,.;;;',, 11/01/10 CITYWIDE "HOT SPOTS" CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS 11/02/10 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 39 UNDERSIDEWALKS AREA #1 CLEANED & CHECKED 2 BOWLS 11/03/10 TEMECULA PARKWAY AT BEDFORD CLEANED & CHECKED 2 BOWLS AREA #1 CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS TEMECULA PARKWAY AT MARGARITA CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 11/04/10 MAIN STREET CLEANED & CHECKED 0 CATCH BASINS 11/08/10 CITYWIDE 'HOT SPOTS" CLEANED & CHECKED 24 CATCH BASINS 11/09/10 AREAS #1 & #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 5 UNDERSIDEWALKS AREAS #1 & #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 3 CATCH BASINS 11/10/10 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 15 UNDERSIDEWALKS 11/15/10 CITYWIDE "HOT SPOTS" CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS 11/16/10 AREA #3 & #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 29 UNDERSIDEWALKS AREA #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 58 UNDERSIDEWALKS CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 19 BRIDGE DRAINS 11/17/10 RANCHO VISTA CLEANED & CHECKED 7 CATCH BASINS OVERLAND BRIDGE CLEANED & CHECKED 4 BRIDGE DRAINS RAINBOW CANYON CLEANED & CHECKED 6 CATCH BASINS 11/18/10 AREAS #4 & #5 CLEANED & CHECKED 30 UNDERSIDEWALKS CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 23 DOWN SPOUTS 11/22/10 CITYWIDE HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 29 CATCH BASINS AREA #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 20 UNDERSIDEWALKS 11/23/10 AREA #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 39 CATCH BASINS RAINBOW CANYON CLEANED & CHECKED 1 DOWN SPOUT 11/24/10 OLD TOWN CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS AREAS # 1 - #5 CLEANED & CHECKED 8 CATCH BASINS RAMAINTAINNVOCCMPLETD1CATCHBAS1 : m :�en.°i .^.'�":k «.dx j�++,yy^^ r __."........a.^....^'^14"'^52�]5` RdJ0:z�:dfl6654&"�?.;�".n _, .. ,.,. ,�............. "6.M . J : ..'^'�^w'=� :`8 >...'-.w.wr.£SFrt�:T...x..'':. eN « m r�Y » «'.Mew'.,. mmE.e., .-«.sE893X-^-p^^=:'=e3RF•''mm..a^`2" =,xai.ww«-r.w.«.rw«-,-,..__...._...a__ _ ,i»"°"»:z4„"r^'.-".'.x,E3: :^se.' : .e ........... ... ....w ^e.a...mLi«:«::« �: �"`e :.:`m� ;^: a°.m°S. w ew.eSeb1':>L^ _S1'^.e".E4��.�,. ...,.«...r.... """". Ee�e...sa..a. ......,...,....._..__..a15.i.,:.-:r.«...9..,_-rG.mm.m.e��a.s?a�-�^^i-.YiE�`s��.-".�56.w.«ai-...u'E rt :: :. , ..:µ,;ms �,.. "�"..� m ° s..... ^"w3�«S° .ate«.e q�@^^."°"...'^.:�'"«..Y:'.' ,.rk^_..-.» .- �' d , "Y.�"I�iG:SF��:+:1.!.�... . a�::'.X µ'Es::9. n, .. m». ie. .., ._ ,. 11/29/10 CITY HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 14 CATCH BASINS 11/30/10 OLD TOWN CLEANED & CHECKED 29 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED TOTAL UNDERSIDEWALKS CLEANED & CHECKED TOTAL BOWLS CLEANED AND CHECKED TOTAL DOWNSPOUTS CLEANED AND CHECKED TOTAL BRIDGE DRAINS CLEANED AND CHECKED 235 196 4 24 23 R:1MA1NTNMWKCell' LETD\CATCHBASI CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2010 11/01/10 WOLF CREEK AT GREEN OAK REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI CAMPANULA ATAUGUSTA REMOVED 1 S.F.OFGRAFFITI RANCHO VISTA AT LOMA PORTOLA REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD APARTMENTS REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI OLD TOWN FRONT AT 4 REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WINCHESTER BRIDGE AT SANTA GERTRIJDIS CREEK REMOVED 65 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1102h0 80MARGARITA ATK4DRAGA REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI EMPIRE CREEKATTARGET CENTER REMOVED 210 S.F.OF GRAFFITI CAM}NODEL ESTE ATVIA PUERTA REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI LA SERENA AT SO. GENERAL KEARNY REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFLTI LONG VALLEY AT ROANOAKE REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 33105 VERMONT REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/03/10 RANCHO VISTAAT HIGH SCHOOL AREA REMOVED 17 S.F. OF GRAFFITI , 11/05/10 S/B JEFFERSON AT CHERRY REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI ' ENTERPRISE CIRCLE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI DIAZ AT ZEVO REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF VALLEY AT CAMINO ROSALES REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WINCHESTER AT 1-15 FREEWAY REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11k08/0 1-15 FREEWAY AT GOLD'S GYM REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT ¥NEZ REMOVED 80 SF. OF GRAFRTI REDHAWK AT VAIL RANCH REMOVED 6 S.F.<]FGRAFFITI REDHAWK AT WOLF VALLEY REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI PEPPERCORN AT REDHAWK REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 33153 PRIMROSE REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11d2/10 AVEN|OAQELLEZAATOORTETOBARRA REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI CAMINO SAN DIMAS AT PASEO GALLANTE REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI VIA LAC[>LORAOAATOAM|NOSAN D|MAS REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI •.•»•.-•• G°ww.rd.w.«...r..»«&«^"..":»r°:":«:«:'ara9««.w.......r..r.wJ«....,«,.w G.Sa , yt ::. «. ..—^.'.."%a".at.,9E:..F«....L:6]d9i.9a.....�.e-.89.Cn•".a'e..E9:�1..^.e:.'".r r:e:-'e";�'.EB P.e�'.". «^p.9>4.3«Y"««wnw.SG w...a.s...:.x9..:u:tG:«-::.>A".:«"."'- «'=:3 m E:;E«'d""".'"d',".i7 ^ d9xc:¢:EY":Ce:B✓m .aFav:F;e «° r°a."^...Y :.«..«:«E<.".[g:E:.. i'.».:':wwd 9««.r.'^:"BFS...: ^:.69.«-.fi :.4:.:.'Sw:='. .-«..:-,...-. ...r. ............ .....>-"„,..._a.a�.,". `e�E.. .....i.r:.-,:.•--'--r....n�a9v:�.-..;.".'.-.e.�.g....C81ce°E'e'u:='v"E'i?SFs^::e .. _ �.:x:t8-w"e'e'm"Sx;" wD.-.� s b%sY:"m� ^a:.,u j;^....a'e...,......;;�aa " j, ,:"xrA 11/12/10 46129 VIA LA COLORADA REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 46177 VIA LA COLORADA REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 46210 VIA LA COLORADA REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI CERVANTES WAY AT ODESSA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI ODESSA AT CAMINO CAMPO VERDES REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI OVERLAND AT MARGARITA REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 40949 WINCHESTER ROAD REMOVED • 24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/15/10 MORENO AT OLD TOWN FRONT REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK AT LYON LANE REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI OLD TOWN FRONT / PARK-N—RIDE REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REDHAWK AT CAMINITO AVILA REMOVED 6 S.F. OF. GRAFFITI REDHAWK AT CALLE VALLARTA REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI PEPPERCORN AT CORTE ZARAGOZA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REDHAWK PARKWAY REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT TEMECULA CREEK REMOVED 285 S.F. OF GRAFFITI BEHIND PORTOFINO APARTMENTS REMOVED 100 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOWER PLAZA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 40805 WINCHESTER ROAD REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 151 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/18/10 CEBU DRIVE AT CALLE ELENITA REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT RANCHO VISTA REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RORIPAUGH AT SWALLOW REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RORIPAUGH AT SENNA COURT REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RORIPAUGH AT NICOLAS REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 30385 SIERRA MADRE REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/19/10 JEFFERSON AT SANBORN REMOVED 60 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/22/10 MORENO AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 45683 WOLF CREEK REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 44711 JOHNSTON REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/22/10 43765 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 43765 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI YNEZ AT SOLANA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI R:IMAINTAIN IWKCMPLTDIGRAFFETII �°�""-- K::. - m..._..»w».;:�............ ..«... e.. M=,..., e««.«aWssWab9�'a^:.:� _.e :avxs", .."L...^'s ^....e:"^iv£BS•^ .-•-«-.»..., 4"Xe.®erg ". rt_......_ ........__ ... _ SFr'm.`zi^^: - iS««m3....5I.:.n�.' b ^'^"erl.W;eee e: d,. ,8 b _ "S^'.er".:. '..-r«..re °']'-',gy^...�.." .C:.. Z�""nw`'"=,�'+W-, ee,w ■y„��j ”.-..-.L G£ ���ry$� e9• rei:"' .. ,.. �' 1 "em.A.. �"oc. y-:-a-.a.��,`ii: ......".z':<pL:°�r=JS:t".;..u;,..�. �=• y. S"'^ ... �"e.....r.�3ma.T ... �r..m F�'^ .:^..:�: m�.^A, � 11/23/10 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER REMOVED .,..nP 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT NICOLAS REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI PAUBA AT VIA RAMI REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/24/10 29738 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI CALLE REVA REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/29/10 - DLR DRIVE ATI -15 FREEWAY REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI YNEZ AT TOWN CENTER REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI NICOLAS AT NO. GENERAL KEARNY REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 41257 CHARDONNAY HILLS REMOVED 45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TARGET CENTER REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-15 FREEWAY AT TEMECULA CREEK REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI EDISON PLANT REMOVED 90 S.F. OF GRAFFITI LAS COLINAS AT MORAGA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 33198 ROMANCE PLACE REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI JUNIPER AT WOLF CREEK REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI ELM AT WOLF CREEK REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI ELM AT WOLF VALLEY REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 45667 PECHANGA PARKWAY REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI AVENIDA DE MISSIONS REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI VAIL RANCH AT REDHAWK PARKWAY REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI f LA PRIMAVERA AT PAUBA REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI PAUBA (ACROSS FROM LIBRARY) REMOVED 120 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REDHAWK AT VIA RIO TEMECULA REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/30/10 CUPA AT JOSHEROO REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI NO. GENERAL KEARNY BRIDGE REMOVED 130 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED TOTAL LOCATIONS 2.052 89 R:\NMAINTAlrnwl(CMPLTD1GRAFFITn APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT O OO O O o 00 O O 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 O 000000000©©000000©©0000000 000000O000000000000OOO0000 e?d'd d' 1-1•CO ICOte MNNNNN%-r-rr 1- L 0 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2010 ......"..."...,....... ."."........._ ...,......_"......................_."_e........,."__."."."."....".....,.,.-".',:Sf.,-..,,.......,......._......"....._.»«.". <-". _"..-.-.....,..-... .b...,..."...... "..., _.....".,.........q......._...._...._.."."..."._.......a_.«....".._._m....,..,...:-_......._.".; ' :" ....p T".ik°.rE�.. .o-F..m.,.' a 9. .. .' 10/26/10 CAMPANULA WAY GRAFFITI 11/01/10 10/27/10 31138 CAMINO DEL ESTE SIGN REPAIR 11/01/10 11/01/10 NO. GENERAL KEARNYAT SIERRA MADRE CATCH BASIN 11/01/10 MARGARITA AT MORAGA GRAFFITI 11/01/10 43360 CORTE BENEVENTE GRAFFITI 11/01/10 29935 & 29934 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL DEAD TREES 11/04/10 33105 VERMONT ROAD GRAFFITI 11/02/10 11/02/10 ROANOAK AT LONG VALLEY GRAFFITI ' 11/02/10 VAIL RANCH AT OVERLAND TRAIL SIGN REPAIR 11/01/10 DIAZ AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD ARE HYDRANT 11/02/10 11/03/10 29873 VAIL BROOKE DRIVE TREE 11/03/10 WALLABY AT JAGUAR DEBRIS 11/04/10 OLD TOWN PARKING LOT DEBRIS 1/04/10 11/04/10 41087 VINTAGE CIRCLE TREE 11/04/10 11/04/10 30500 SHENANDOAH COURT TREE 11/04/10 39340 LIEFER SIGN REPAIR 11/05/10 11/05/10 TOPEKA COURT AT ESSER COURT DEBRIS 11/05/10 WOLF VALLEY AT CAMINO ROSALES GRAFFITI 11/05/10 28566 PUJOL TREES 11/10/10 JUNE AT NICOLAS SIGN REPAIR 11/05/10 11/07/10 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN TRAFFIC ACCIDENT 11/08/10 11/08/10 TEMECULA PARKWAY FROM 15 FWY TO BUTTERFIELD DEBRIS 11/08/10 JEFFERSON ROAD / RICHARDSON R.V. STORM DRAIN 11/10/10 31918 CORTE MONTECITO TREE 11/08/10 REDHAWK PARKWAY AT VAIL RANCH GRAFFITI 11/08/10 11/11/10 AVENIDA BELLEZA AT CORTE TOBARRA GRAFFITI 11/11/10 11/12/10 BIKE PATH ON WINCHESTER CREEK GRAFFITI 11/12/10 R:IMAINI'AINIWRKCOMPLTDISORSI :..0.: ..__...... _ _... __... .__._..._.........� .......... _...::.: CA�I�IrN 7,-;.r.:.�.. W::.::::::::::.:.�::.:.,.-.::.�.itE )-:.�,-- - - ., _,::..:;-,� ::.;_.,::::u. --....W....... 11/12/10 SOLANA AT MARGARITA SIGN REPAIR 11/12/10 11/10/10 MORAGA AT MARGARITA SHOPPING CARTS 11/10/10 11/07/10 44615 CORTE VERANOS CONCRETE REPAIR 11/10/10 11/12/10 LIEFER ROAD ROAD CONDITIONS 11/15/10 11/15/10 43029 ARGO COURT DEBRIS 11/15/10 VIA LOBO CHANNEL DEBRIS 11/16/10 11/16/10 CEBU DRIVE AT CALLE ELENITA GRAFFITI 11/17/10 11/17/10 RANCHO WAY AT BUSINESS PARK DEBRIS IN ROAD 11/17/10 11/19/10 MARGARITA BETWEEN MORAGA & STONEWOOD POTHOLE 11/19/10 11/22/10 30465 CABRILLO TREE 11/22/10 LIEFER ROAD WANTS ROAD SCRAPED 11/22/10 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND YNEZ POTHOLE 11/22/10 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND MAIN STREET DRAIN 11/22/10 ANZA ROAD AT DRYMAN DEBRIS 11/23/10 11/24/10 43040 MARGARITA GRAFFITI 11/24/10 E!mum 41257 PROMENADE CHARDONNAY GRAFFITI 11/29/10 MARGARITA AT YMCA GRAFFITI 11/29/10 VAIL RANCH MIDDLE SCHOOL SIGN 11/29/10 MARGARITA AT VAIL RANCH GRAFFITI 11/29/10 REDHAWK AT VALENTINO GRAFFITI 11/29/10 MARGARITA AT PAUBA GRAFFITI 11/29/10 41245 PROMENADE CHARDONNAY TREE/SIDEWALK 11/29/10 11/30/10 NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT NICOLAS GRAFFITI 11/30/10 NO. GENERAL KEARNY BIKE TRAIL GRAFFITI 11/30/10 STONEWOOD AT MARGARITA DEBRIS 11/30/10 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 52 R:\MA1NTM N WRKCOMPLTD\SORS1 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2010 ilio —�'� e «# I>A^.. : t_.. q s�''''.,- 11/01/10 11/01/10 e1 BANNER REPLACEMENT .,.., .e.. e ...., :..'..--. w ... 92 TOTAL WINCHESTER AT MARGARITA • REPAIR R2-40 11/02/10 W/O TEMECULA PARKWAY AT WABASH LANE NEW INSTALL 52-55 VIA PUERTA AT LA SERENA REPAIR SNS YNEZ AT PAUBA REPLACE W3-3 11/04/10 OLD TOWN INSTALLED 56 XMAS WREATHS VAIL RANCH AT TEHACHAPI REPLACED R4-7 & K—MARKER MARGARITA AT OVERLAND TRAIL REPLACED 2 DELINEATORS 11/05/10 LA SERENA AT MEADOWS REPLACED R2-45 JUNE COURT AT NICOLAS REPAIR SNS 11/08/10 BUTTERFIELD STAGE A JEREZ REPLACED R4-7 OVERLAND TRAIL AT VAIL RANCH REPLACED R1 & SNS REDHAWK PARKWAY AT VIA RIO TEMECULA REPLACED R3-7 PUJOL AT MAIN STREET REPLACED W13-1 11/12/10 AVENIDA BELLEZA AT CORTE ORIZABA REPAIR SNS TEMECULA PARKWAY AT VIA CONSUELO REPLACE R-7 COUR BEAUNE AT RUE JADOT REPAIR "NO OUTLET" 11/15/10 JEFFERSON AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REPAIR R4-7 OLD TOWN FRONT AT MAIN REPAIR R1-1 OVERLAND TRAIL AT VAIL RANCH REPAIR R1-1 VAIL RANCH AT HARMONY REPAIR R1-1 VAIL RANCH AT SILKY WAY REPAIR R4-7 VAIL RANCH AT CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO REPAIR R4-7 VAIL RANCH AT NIGHTHAWK REPAIR R4-7 YNEZ AT TOWER PLAZA REPAIR R4-7 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT DE PORTOLA REPAIR R2-55 R:1MA1NTAINIWKCMPLTDISIGNSI w� s, = w m. ,art-•a>ian*�sxs.e�3 ,:W�:r�m:m :....., - -. �-,:,w.::. m m�m:� �°:_�� w�,•'��;� Ba.^:��S...vL-.m°5�8sPbf�?v�w..w. "yY ®T.�ma........P.'�'"rr' --�'= 1�Ei �k«s= s .�$�.y .a�.=..m�:�. �'� �'ti�«�L.r^,�;,. s$i- ',,- , -. ...l ..rr .... P_...., :fie •:, ""`-� g: s?a ��ds irrr� �qr sr, ;ems �.;��,� � ...�:--���� �ir, �. m�s�'�;:f. ,. /,. .. me :i° m',,mn'is^aq^:�-r."•�.��isr°.�.�� 7---- ��sa•� ¢�„'i �::.. �.�»�"�'..-.n4asG ^`�sa.a..�.� -,-'-.iwr--^xFrof 11/16/10 CANTERBURY AT TEMECULA LANE REPLACED R1-1 11/19/10 VALLEJO N/O LA PAZ REPLACED SCHOOL ZONE WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON REPLACED R4-7 CALLE MEDUSA NEW INSTALL W3-1 HARVESTON SCHOOL AT MARGARITA REPAIR SNS & R-26 MARGARITA AT HARVESTON WAY REPLACED R4-7 WINCHESTER AT YNEZ REPAIR R2-4 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN REPAIR R4-7 11/22/10 YNEZ AT RANCHO VISTA REPLACED W3-3 DE PORTOLA AT CAMPANULA REPLACED R4-7 11/23/10 PECHANGA AT RAINBOW CANYON NEW INSTALL (3) WEIGHT LIMIT BAYHILL AT CLUBHOUSE REPAIR R1-1 CEBU AT JULO WAY NEW INSTALL W14-1 JULO WAY AT AHERN NEW INSTALL W14-1 11/24/10 MERCEDES AT 6T11 REPAIR S-66-21 MERCEDES AT 6TH REPAIR R-26 11/29/10 CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO AT WELTON REPAIR R1-1 JUNIPER AT WOLF REPAIR R1-1 JUNIPER AT SEA STAR REPAIR SNS WOLF CREEK REPAIR R26 & S4-3 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED TOTAL BANNER INSTALLED 19 6 31 92 R:IMAAI'I'AINIWKCMPLTDISIGNS I CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2010 R:SMAINTAINIWRKCOMPLTDISTRIPING ' .._... - ' 6g 1i;�' w i 6 _:a B ��,� JdsiSs:3x:26YE nY eaev 11/03/10 AREA #4 REPAINTED 72 BULLNOSE 11/04/10 AREA #5 REPAINTED 45 BULLNOSE AREA #5 REPAINTED 34 BULLNOSE 11/12/10 MERCEDES AT 3RD NEW INSTALL STOP -N -BAR MERCEDES AT 4TH NEW INSTALL (2) STOP -N -BAR MIRA LOMA AT RANCHO VISTA NEW INSTALL STOP -N -BAR TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. TOTAL REPAINTED BULLNOSE TOTAL NEW INSTALLS 0 0 151 8 R:SMAINTAINIWRKCOMPLTDISTRIPING CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TREM IING MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2010 11/04/10 11/05/10 11/101/0 11/16/10 11/22/10 11/23/10 11/29/10 11/30/10 28636 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET NICOLAS ROAD TRIMMED TRIMMED 1 R.Q.W. TREES 1 R.O.W. TREES MARGARITA BETWEEN PAUBA AND RANCHO VISTA YNEZ BETWEEN PAUBA AND RANCHO VISTA RAINBOW CANYON TRIMMED TRIMMED TRIMMED 7 R.O.W. TREES 6 R.Q.W. TREES 8 R.O.W. TREES YNEZ AT TOWER PLAZA TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES PECHANGA AT RAINBOW CANYON JOHNSTON AT CORTE GUTIERREZ PECHANGA AT HURON TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 1 R.O.W. TREES 3RD AT OLD TOWN FRONT TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 28 R:IMAIN1'AINIWRKCOMPLTDITREES MEMORANDUM TO: Greg J 1, ler, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Supervisor DATE: January 7, 2011 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - December, 2010 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of December, 2010: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired D. Banners Replaced IL TREES 61 17 41 0 A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 50 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned B. Down Spouts C. Under sidewalks D. Bowls V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VL GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 2,334 43.5 196 0 0 0 89 B. Total S.F. 4,806 Vil STENCILING A. 81 New and repainted legends B. 0 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 0 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic R:NAINTAIMMOACIRPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 73 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 52 service order requests for the month of November, 2010. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 258 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of December, 2010 was $111,620.00 compared to $ 179,433.09 for the month of November, 2010. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 Electronic Copies: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer $ 14,215.00 $ 93,053.00 $ 4,342.00 Capital Improvements Land Development Traffic Division R:1MAI N V A[MMOACTRPT a — z o 0 0 0 mc — 0 273 32 $17.808.00 0 6 0 . 0 ai (0 0 0 0) 0 1ST HALF TOTALS 18,000 0 18 $29,853.00 0o 49 CO C.- OAo Co 0 CO CZ 17) 0 510,455.00 T.- iN LO CO '4: 3- CONTRACTORS JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Asphalt Square Feet 0 0 0 14,000 4,000 0 Concrete Square Feet 0 0 0 0 0 0 Drainage Channels 0 8 0 2 8 0 TOTAL COSTS 50.00 57,300.00 $0.00 $46,295.00 522 553,00 $0.00 CONTRACT STRIPING Striping Linear Feet 0 0 0 0 2,254,489 0 Sandblasting Linear Feet 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL COSTS $0.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $149,958.09 50.00 TREE CONTRACTORS Trees Trimmed 55 0 5 0 2 211 Trees Removed 0 0 0 0 17 15 TOTAL COSTS 52,750.00 50.00 $1,800.00 50.00 $4,258.00 510,800.00 R.O.W. SPRAYING SQ. FT. 0 0 187,000 0 0 0 TOTAL COSTS 50.00 50.00 $10,455.00 50.00 5000 $0.00 CITY MAINTENANCE CREW Banners 92 75 184 92 92 0 Signs Replaced 91 47 47 34 19 61 Signs Installed 6 13 7 9 6 17 Signs Repaired 141 121 88 80 31 41 Catch Basins Cleaned 215 246 147 372 482 196 Trees Trimmed 105 101 141 101 28 50 R.O.W. Weed Abatement 1,380 100 0 0 0 0 New & Repainted Legends 306 381 784 449 159 81 After Hours Call Outs 145 72.5 98 168 50 258 Service Order Requests 98 86 73 61 52 73 Graffiti Removal - S. Ft 2,779 2,840 4,115 4,471 2,052 4,806 - — TOTAL COSTS 52,750,00 57,300.00 $12,255.00 $46,295.00 $176,769.09 $10,800.00 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed..the following projectsfor the month of December, 2010 DATE ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL COST SIZE CONTRACTOR: RYAN MONTELEONE EXCAVATION INC. Date: 12/30/10 VIA LOBO CHANNEL REMOVAL OF SAND, SILT AND DEBRIS TOTAL COST $ 44,540.00 Da c: 2/30/10 VALLEJO CHANNEL REMOVAL OF SAND, SILT AND DEBRIS TOTAL COST $ 48,513.00 D c: 12/30/10 I IEFER ROAD REPAIR ROAD FROM RAIN DAMAGE TOTAL COST $ 4,342.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING Date: # RAINBOW CANYON ROAD REPAIR AND REPLACE DAMAGED GUARD RAIL TOTALCOST $ 3,415.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. Date: 12/15/10 # CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING TOTAL COST $ 10,800.00 Date: TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 Turn COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 93,053.00 $ 14,215.00 $ 4,342.00 I\MALNi AIIAMOACTRPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2010 SCOPE OF WORK 12/02/10 SIB FRONT STREET BETWEEN 2ST AND TEMECULA PKWY R&R 2 12/06/10 NICOLAS ROAD POTHOLES CITYWIDE POTHOLES 1 RAINBOW CANYON 12/07/10 OLD TOWN FRONT AT SANTIAGO R&R TOTAL TONS 40 6 45 TEMP 38 40 2.5 12 6 80 6 30 30 19 3 48 TEMP 12 40 3 2 20 4 8 4 20 383 12/08/10 RAINBOW CANYON DOWN SPOUTS 345 12/14/10 BACCARAT CUL-DE-SAC DOWNSPOUT/R&R RAINBOW CANYON E.P. 12/15/10 NADA LANE DOWN SPOUTS CITYWIDE POTHOLES 12/20/10 MARGARITA ROAD POTHOLES JEFFERSON ROAD POTHOLES MARGARITA ROAD POTHOLES 12/21/10 JEDEDIAH SMITH POTHOLES YNEZ AT RANCHO VISTA POTHOLES MARGARITA AT SANTIAGO POTHOLES NICOLAS ROAD POTHOLES 114 12/22/10 OLD TOWN FRONT AT TEMECULA PARKWAY POTHOLES 10 RAINBOW CANYON POTHOLES RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ POTHOLES RANCHO VISTA AT YNEZ POTHOLES MARGARITA ROAD POTHOLES 120 NICOLAS ROAD AT CALLE MEDUSA POTHOLES JEDEDIAH SMITH POTHOLES 102 12/23/10 MARGARITA ROAD POTHOLES 178 SANTIAGO ROAD AT MARGARITA POTHOLES 15 12/20/10 FRONT STREET BETWEEN SANTIAGO & TEMECULA PKWY POTHOLES 16 12/27/10 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ POTHOLES 15 R:\MAlNTA IN;WKCMI'Uf UASPf7ALT.RPR DATE TOTAL TONS 12/27/10 YNEZ AT RANCHO VISTA POTHOLES 2 TEMP ABBOTT AT YNEZ POTHOLES 12 1 YNEZ AT COUNTY CENTER POTHOLES 10 1 MARGARITA AT SOLANA POTHOLES 3 1 MARGARITA FROM SOLANA TO SANTIAGO POTHOLES 23 NICOLAS AT JUNE POTHOLES 8 NICOLAS ROAD POTHOLES 20 1 1 3' 12/28/10 RANCHO WAY POTHOLES 3 TEMP DIAZ AT ZEVO POTHOLES 8 1 SOLANA POTHOLES 4 1 NORTH GENERAL KEARNY POTHOLES 1 1 NICOLAS ROAD POTHOLES 29 1 MARGARITA ROAD POTHOLES 43 2.5 CITYWIDE POTHOLES 107 2.5 WINCHESTER AT RORIPAUGH POTHOLES 3 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE AT RIDER POTHOLES 2 MARGARITA AT VIA LA VIDA POTHOLES 20 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2,334 TOTAL TONS 43.5 R AMAINTAINJWKCMM.1 F)`v\SPHA[.T.R R CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2010 DATE :' LOCATION WORK COMPLETED, 12/01/10 OLD TOWN AREA CLEANED & CHECKED 4 CATCH BASINS 12/02/10 OLD TOWN AREA CLEANED & CHECKED 10 CATCH BASINS 12/06/10 CITYWIDE HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 21 CATCH BASINS 12/07/10 JEFFERSON AT WINCHESTER CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 12/13/10 CITYWIDE HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 22 CATCH BASINS 12/14/10 AREAS #4, #3 & ##2 CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 12/16/10 CITYWIDE HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 9 CATCH BASINS CITYWIDE HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 6 BOWLS 12/20/10 CITYWIDE HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS 12/21/10 OLD TOWN CLEANED & CHECKED 25 CATCH BASINS 12/22/10 OLD TOWN CLEANED & CHECKED 10 CATCH BASINS DE PORTOLA CLEANED & CHECKED 4 CATCH BASINS OLD TOWN CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 12/23/10 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 7 CATCH BASINS DE PORTOLA AT PIO PICO CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS 12/27/10 HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS MARGARITA AT AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS 12/29/10 CITYWIDE HOT SPOTS CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED TOTAL BOWLS & CHECKED 196 6 R:IMAIE FTA1NiWKCM[i..ETD''.CATCI iI3AS. CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2010 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 12/06/10 BEHIND TARGET CENTER REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WINCHESTER AT CREEK REMOVED 93 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REMOVED 47 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WINCHESTER AT BRIDGE REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI NO. GENERAL KEARNY REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI NICOLAS AT JOSEPH REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 1-15 FWY AT OVERLAND BRIDGE REMOVED 255 S.F. OF GRAFFITI N/B 15 FWY. AT TEMECULA/MURRIETA CITY LIMITS REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI BEHIND K -MART REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI SANTIAGO BRIDGE AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK AT ANTELOPE REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MULE DEER AT OREGON REMOVED 2 S,F. OF GRAFFITI VIA RIO TEMECULA AT VIA LUCIDO REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI OVERLAND TRAIL REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REDHAWK PARKWAY AT VAIL RANCH REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MIRA LOMA CHANNEL REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI N/B 15 FWY. AT TEMECULA PKWY. REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/09/10 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER ROAD REMOVED 65 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA ROAD AT MARGARITA PARK REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI LIEFER ROAD BRIDGE REMOVED 150 S.F. OF GRAFFITI BEHIND PAULEY EQUIPMENT REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK DRIVE AT CHANNEL REMOVED 130 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK DRIVE AT PECHANGA CHANNEL REMOVED 45 S.F, OF GRAFFITI REDHAWK PKWY. AT CAMINO BROZAS REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/13/10 WOLF CREEK NORTH AT ALPINE PLACE REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK SOUTH AT MURDOCK LANE REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK NORTH AT ELM REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI R:' tvIA1NT'AIYIWKCMPL ['D\GRAFI'['t't`. DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 12/13/10 CHANNEL AT AVENIDA DE MISSIONS REMOVED 600 S.F. OF GRAFFITI VIA RIO TEMECULA AT COUNTRY GLEN REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT TEHACHAPI PASS REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK NORTH AT ALTO VISTA REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI YNEZ AT DATE REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RAINBOW CANYON AT OAK CLIFF REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/14/10 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 75 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 35 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 22 S.F, OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 28450 FELIX VALDEZ REMOVED 100 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 28450 FELIX VALDEZ REMOVED 60 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK AT FIRESIDE REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK AT ROCKY BAR REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI WOLF CREEK AT GREEN OAK REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI DEER HOLLOW AT PEPPERCORN REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REDHAWK AT PEPPERCORN REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI VAIL RANCH AT NICLYN REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REDHAWK AT OVERLAND TRAIL REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TARGET CENTER REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TARGET CENTER REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TARGET CENTER REMOVED 60 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TARGET CENTER REMOVED 700 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TARGET CENTER REMOVED 300 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TARGET CENTER REMOVED 225 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/15/10 SOLANA WAY REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI R;\MAI NTA WKCMPLfD'•GRA FFFH DATE LOCATJON WORK COMPLETED 12/15/10 YNEZAT DEALER DRIVE REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 34 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 50 S.F, OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 120 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 100 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI I MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/17/10 WOLF VALLEY ROAD 100' N/O WOLF CREEK REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT RANCHO VISTA REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT JEFFERSON REMOVED 117 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/20/10 WOLF CREEK DRIVE AT WOLF VALLEY REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/27/10 PECHANGA AT LOMA LINDA REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI AVENIDA DE MISSIONS AT VIA RIO TEMECULA REMOVED 125 S.F. OF GRAFFITI VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI ' SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK BRIDGE AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 200 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT SOLANA REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT CARA WAY REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD REMOVED 1 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12/28/10 REDHAWK AT VIA SALTIO REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI PROMENADE CHARDONNAY AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI MARGARITA AT AVENIDA BARCA REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI SOLANA AT MARGARITA REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI ' 12/29/10 OVERLAND BRIDGE REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED TOTAL LOCATIONS 4,806 84 R:iMAINTAIN.WKCMP1; f171CRAWITI\ Ca w 0 Z .14 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 rC)N )—C*-LcaMr01`L{)MrolioMr01�LoC Lel ' "4"1d 41nM MMMNN NNN Totals for the Year To Date: Jan. 1, 2011 0 W 00 TOTAL CALLS M '.0 M N \Gp 00 00 r -i r -f w4 w1 e�4 +�N 1-1 }� 4-,y ,.Q set0 4_9 ., cl f� Q ti ti d' 00 O Z A W c 00 VO of,© cfl O` O i *noo o 00 0 et CS 0w 4? Q.4 d .0 y .0 .0 C Co CI p. C Q 00 o Z A R:A!NTErwceGRAFFIrrcr.,nciChrt_Inaoc CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2010 DATE ; LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 12/02/10 4TH STREET TRIMMED 4 R.O.W. TREES 3RD STREET TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 12/06/10 CREEK SIDE TRIMMED 8 R.O.W. TREES 12/07/10 RAINBOW CANYON TRIMMED 9 R.O.W. TREES 41460 ROYAL DORNOCH COURT TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 12/08/10 RAINBOW AT PECHANGA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 12/10/10 AVENIDA ALVARADO AT AQUA VISTA TRIMMED 8 R.O.W. TREES PASEO DE LAS OLAS AT CALLE TAJO TRIMMED 5 R.O.W. TREES VAIL RANCH AT EAST RIDGE TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES 12/21/10 MARGARITA AT AVENIDA BARCA TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES 12/22/10 CABRILLO AT YORBA TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 12/23/10 TEMECULA PARKWAY AT MARGARITA TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 12/20/10 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT YNEZ TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 12/27/10 30884 MEDINAH TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES 12/29/10 JEFFERSON ROAD AT DEL RIO TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES t, TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 50 R:'.MA1NTAIN1WRKCOMPUr[)TRE S CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2010 DATE REC'D LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 11/23/10 PAUBA ROAD AT LINFIELD SCHOOL GRAFFITI 11/23/10 12/02/10 TEMECULA GARDEN APTS. ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. TREE 12/02/10 11/30/10 REDHAWK AT VAIL RANCH GRAFFITI 12/02/10 12/02/10 PAUBA ROAD AT LIBRARY HAZ MAT 12/03/10 VIA RIO TEMECULA AT VIA LUCIDO GRAFFITI 12/03/10 12/06/10 45775 CREEK SIDE WAY TREE 12/06/10 41460 ROYAL DORNOCH TREE 12/07/10 12/07/10 STONEWOOD AT MARGARITA DEBRIS 12/08/10 12/08/10 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER GRAFFITI 12/08/10 12/09/10 SANTA CECILIA DRIVE SIGN REPAIR 12/10/10 WOLF CREEK ROAD AT PECHANGA GRAFFITI 12/09/10 MARGARITA AT MARGARITA PARK GRAFFITI 12/09/10 12/10/10 CAMINO ROSA AT REDHAWK PARKWAY GRAFFITI 12/10/10 12/07/10 42050 MAIN STREET SIDEWALK 12/14/10 12/13/10 DE REY AT AVENIDA BARCA SIGN REPAIR 12/13/10 39372 OAK CLIFF DRIVE SIGN REPAIR 12/13/10 12/11/10 REDHAWK AT PEPPERCORN GRAFFITI 12/14/10 12/13/10 RAINBOW CREEK AT OAK CLIFF SIGN REPAIR 12/16/10 KENT HINTERGARDT PARK CATCH BASIN 12/14/10 WOLF CREEK AT LIVE OAK GRAFFITI 12/14/10 SOLANA WAY GRAFFITI 12/15/10 VAIL RANCH AT NICLYN GRAFFITI 12/14/10 12/14/10 YUKON AT RED RIVER CIRCLE SIGN REPAIRS 12/16/10 12/15/10 15 FWY. AT SANTIAGO OVERPASS GRAFFITI 12/14/10 12/20/10 REDHAWK AT OVERLAND TRAIL TREE 12/20/10 VAIL RANCH AT CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO TREE 12/20/10 PAUBA AT YNEZ TREE 12/20/10 RAMAINTAIN WRKCOMPL'PO'SORS', DATE REC'D LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 12/20/10 PAUBA AT LA PRIMAVERA TREE 12/20/10 12/21/10 KIMBERLY LANE ROAD REPAIRS 12/21/10 ROYAL BIRKDALE TREE 12/21/10 YNEZ AT RANCHO VISTA POTHOLE 12/21/10 WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON POTHOLE 12/21/10 WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON POTHOLE 12/21/10 BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. MUD IN ROAD 12/21/10 I NICOLAS ROAD FLOODED ROAD 12/21/10 29609 CALLE VIOLETA TREE 12/21/10 TEMECULA PARKWAY AT REDHAWK ROADWAY FLOODED 12/21/10 40495 CALLE MADERO TREE 12/21/10 PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS ROAD CLOSURE 12/23/10 NICOLAS AT NO. GENERAL KEARNY TREE 12/22/10 COUNTY CENTER AT YNEZ TREE 12/22/10 12/22/10 30884 MEDINAH WAY TREE 12/22/10 43062 VIA DOS PICOS CATCH BASIN 12/22/10 28897 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET POTHOLE 12/22/10 OVERLAND AT YNEZ DEBRIS 12/22/10 KIMBERLY LANE ROADWAY ISSUES 12/22/10 27705 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TREE 12/22/10 LIEFER ROAD ROADWAY ISSUES 12/22/10 12/27/10 PALA ROAD / PAST PECHANGA POTHOLE 12/27/10 12/22/10 42152 DEODAR LANE TREE 12/22/10 12/27/10 KLARER LANE AT CHANTILLY TREE 12/29/10 41521 CORTE PERGAMINO TREE 12/29/10 32050 LIVE OAK DRIVE TREE 12/29/10 12/16/10 40527 CHANTILLY CIRCLE NICOLAS ROAD 12/27/10 12/20/10 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT LA PAZ TREE 12/29/10 39120 LIEFER ROAD ROAD ISSUES 12/20/10 RANCHO VISTA AT FOSSE DEBRIS 12/23/10 28750 VALLEJO CHANNEL ISSUES 12/22/10 12/22/10 LIEFER ROAD ROAD ISSUES 12/22/10 12/23/10 MARGARITA AT MORAGA DEBRIS IN ROAD 12/27/10 R:1MAINTA INAVRKCOMPLTDSQRS`- DATE RECD LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK COMPLETED 12/23/10 MARGARITA AT AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL STORM DRAIN 12/27/10 12/27/10 30482 SPICA COURT TREE 12/27/10 CAMINO DEL VINO AT CORTE ALEGRIA POTHOLE 12/27/10 MARGARITA ROAD POTHOLES 12/27/10 SOLANA AT MARGARITA POTHOLES 12/27/10 MARGARITA AT DEL MAR APARTMENTS GRAFFITI 12/27/10 MARGARITA AT RAMSEY COURT GRAFFITI 12/28/10 SOLANA AT MARGARITA GRAFFITI 12/28/10 12/28/10 REDHAWK AT WOLF VALLEY GRAFFITI 12/28/10 BUTTERFIELD STAGE AT CROWNE HILL POTHOLE 12/28/10 45435 PEACOCK PLACE UNDERSIDEWALK DRAIN 12/29/10 MEADOWS PARKWAY AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD DEBRIS 12/28/10 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT CABRILLO SIGN REPAIR 12/29/10 EEE TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 73 R:MAI NTAIIV'•.\V R KCOMPL:11-Y.SORS'. CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2010 DATE LOCATION ` WORK COMPLETED 12/01110 5TH STREET REPAIRED SNS 12/02110 MAIN AT FRONT INSTALL WINTER FEST (2) NICOLE AT MARGARITA REPAIR SNS FIRST STREET AT FRONT REPAIR SNS RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT DIAZ REPAIR 2 DELINEATORS DIAZ AT RANCHO WAY REPAIR 12 DELINEATORS 12/03/10 28069 DIAZ REPLACED 3 DELINEATORS 12/06/10 NICOLAS AT JOSEPH REPAIR R1-1 12/07/10 TEMEKU AT PAR REPAIR (3) R26-81 12/08/10 RAINBOW CANYON REPLACED 32 CARSONITES CALLE MEDUSA REPLACED (2) W3-3 12/10/10 WESTERN BYPASS AT GUARD RAIL REPLACED 0M4-3 12/13/10 FRONT STREET AT TEMECULA PARKWAY REPLACED 2 DELINEATORS ALTO VISTA AT PINON PINE NEW COMMUNITY WATCH TETON AT GRASS MEADOW NEW COMMUNITY WATCH YELLOWSTONE AT TETON NEW COMMUNITY WATCH MULE DEER AT WHITE TAIL NEW COMMUNITY WATCH MULE DEER AT OREGON NEW COMMUNITY WATCH DEL REY AT AVENIDA BARCA REPLACED R1-1 YNEZ AT DATE REPLACED (3) W3-3 12/15/10 MARGARITA BRIDGE AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REPAIR R26-81 MARGARITA BRIDGE AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REPLACED 1 DELINEATOR TEMECULA PARKWAY AT OLD TOWN FRONT NEW INSTALL CITY HALL SIGN FRONT NORTH OF TEMECULA PARKWAY NEW INSTALL CITY HALL SIGN FRONT AT SANTIAGO NEW INSTALL CITY HALL SIGN SANTIAGO EAST OF FRONT NEW INSTALL CITY HALL SIGN R 1MAINTAfFV'AVKCMPL I IY,SIGNS\ DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 12/15/10 JEFFERSON N/O RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD NEW CITY HALL SIGNS RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD W/O FRONT NEW CITY HALL SIGNS FRONT STREET BEFORE MORENO NEW CITY HALL SIGNS W1B FRONT E/O JEFFERSON NEW CITY HALL SIGNS TEMECULA PARKWAY AT MEADOWS REPLACED R4-7 & TYPE K DEL REY AT CALLE PINA COLADA REPLACED R2-35 12/16/10 PECHANGA PARKWAY AT TEMECULA PARKWAY REPAIR W2-2 PECHANGA PARKWAY AT TEMECULA PARKWAY REPAIR W1-7 & OMI -3 PARKING STRUCTURE NEW EMPLOYEE OF QUARTER OAK CLIFF AT RAINBOW CREEK REPLACED R1-1 & SNS 12/17/10 DATE AT KINGWOOD REPAIR R4-7 DATE AT LAKEVIEW REPAIR R9 -3A HARVESTON SCHOOL AT HARVESTON DRIVE REPAIR R1-1 HARVESTON AT MARGARITA REPAIR POLE HARVESTON WAY AT MARGARITA REPAIR 2 SIGNAL POLES DIAZ AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REPAIR R4-7 JEFFERSON AT DEL RIO REPAIR R4-7 28069 DIAZ REPLACED 1 DELINEATOR 12/20/10 PECHANGA PARKWAY REPLACED R4-7 & K -MARKER BUTTERFIELD AT DE PORTOLA REPLACED W3-3 YNEZ AT JEDEDIAH SMITH REPAIR R1-1 12/28/10 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA REPLACED W3-3 NICOLAS ROAD AT LIEFER REPAIR R2-45 YNEZ AT PALM PLAZA REPLACED R4-7 & TYPE K DE PORTOLA AT MEADOWS REPAIR W3-3 NICOLAS AT JOSEPH REPLACED R2-45 12/29/10 NIB FRONT AT SANTIAGO NEW CITY HALL SIGN LA SERENA AT SO. GENERAL KEARNY REPLACED R26-81 DIAZ AT DENDY REPLACED R26 CABRILLO AT JEDEDIAH SMITH REPAIR SNS TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 61 17 41 R:\MAINTAIN^AVKC PL D•SIG?��5`. CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2010 DATE 12/07/10 LOCATION NIGHTHAWK AT VAIL RANCH PARKWAY THERMAL 7 LEGENDS CROWNE HILL AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE THERMAL 1 LEGEND COSMIC AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD THERMAL 1 LEGEND 12/08/10 BEDFORD AT TEMECULA PARKWAY THERMAL 1 LEGEND REDHAWK AT PEPPERCORN THERMAL 2 LEGENDS TEMECULA PARKWAY AT JEDEDIAH SMITH THERMAL 3 LEGENDS 12/13/10 CHARDONNAY HILLS NEW 8 LEGENDS HARVESTON REPAINT 8 LEGENDS 12/15/10 PARKING STRUCTURE NEW 50 STALLS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 81 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 0 R:1MAfNTAIN\WRKCOM1'LTD'.STRIPING Item No. 18 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Andre O'Harra, Chief of Police DATE: January 25, 2011 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of December 2010. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 2616 "Priority One" calls for service 55 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 5.54 Minutes VOLUNTEERS Volunteer administration hours 219 Special Events 286 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 156 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 57 Training hours 109 Total Volunteer hours 1451 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention workshops /Neighborhood watch meetings conducted 1 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 1 Businesses visited 2 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 3 Station Tour 1 Planning Review Projects/Temp Outdoor Use Permits 7 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 318 Sets of fingerprints taken 59 Police reports filed 12 Citations signed off 134 Car Seat Inspections 1 Total receipts $4,157.00 SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM (SET TEAM) On sight felony arrests 14 On sight misdemeanor arrests 8 Felony arrest warrants served 2 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 2 Follow-up investigations 3 Parole/Probation Searches 26 Pedestrian Checks 27 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks 46 Crime Free Housing Checks 27 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations 768 Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints 1 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0 D. U.I. Arrests 41 Non -hazardous citations 344 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 96 Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations 72 Parking citations 113 School Zone 23 Seatbelts 34 Cell Phone Cites 113 Injury collisions 32 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 101 Total Cases Assigned 70 Total Cases Closed 49 Search Warrants Served 17 Arrest 8 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service 361 Felony arrest/filings 10 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 31 Traffic Citations 84 Fingerprints/Livescans 63 Total receipts $4,772.00 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests 1 Misdemeanor arrests 5 Reports 86 Youth counseled 95 Meetings 39 YOUTH ACCOUNTABILITY TEAM School visits 18 Home visits 9 Presentations (Jail Tour) 1 Drug Tests 4 Operations/Truant Sweep 0