Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout102215 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk's Department at 951 - 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting 128 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] MEETING AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC /TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22,2015,6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Coram FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter ROLL CALL: Carter, Hagel, Richardson, Watts, Coram PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of fifteen minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION REPORTS Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Action Minutes of September 24, 2015 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of September 24, 2015. COMMISSION BUSINESS Old Town Market Study RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 2.1 Receive and file the report. 3. Consideration of Multi -Way Stop Signs — Mercedes Street at Third Street RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 3.1 Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing Multi -Way Stop Signs at the intersection of Mercedes Street at Third Street. 4. Reschedule Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meetings of Novemberand December 2015 RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 4.1 Direct Staff to cancel and reschedulethe regular meetings for Novemberand December 2015, and perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements per the Government Code. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public /Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE'1'01liE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (4 1000 Main Street, "I emecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website— www.citvoftemecula.ore —and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting, Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Anv supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 9:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed an the City's website— www.cityoflemecula erg — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. I1 you have any questions regarding any item on the ae_enda for this meeting, please contact the Public Works Department at the 'femecula Civic Center. (951) 694-6411. ITEM NO. 1 Action Minutes of September 24, 2015 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLIC /TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24,2015,6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Coram (6:00 PM) FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Richardson ROLL CALL: Hagel, Richardson, Watts, Coram Absent: Commissioner Carter PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Michael A. Petrofsky COMMISSION REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Action Minutes of August 27, 2015 — Approved staff recommendation (4 -0 -1) with a motion made by Commissioner Richardson and seconded by Commissioner Wafts. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Coram, Hagel, Richardson and Wafts; Commissioner Carter was absent. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of August 27, 2015. COMMISSION BUSINESS Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan — Sidewalk Analysis Update — Report received and filed. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public /Traffic Safety Commission: 2.1 Receive and file the report 3. Consideration of Multi -Way Stop Signs — Mercedes Street at Third Street — A motion was made by Commissioner Coram and seconded by Commissioner Richardson to defer the item to the October 22nd Commission meeting (4 -0 -1). Commissioners asked that staff research a one -way movement through the parking structure as an alternative to the suggested stop signs. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Coram, Hagel, Richardson and Wafts; Commissioner Carter was absent. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 3.1 Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing Multi -Way Stop Signs at the intersection of Mercedes Street at Third Street. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT — The meeting adjourned at 7:49 PM with a motion made by Commissioner Hagel and seconded by Commissioner Richardson. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. David Coram Chairperson Thomas W. Garcia Director of Public Works / City Engineer ITEM NO. 2 Old Town Market Study AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: October 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Item 2 Old Town Market Opportunities Update Prepared By: Lynn Kelly- Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Receive and file the report. BACKGROUND: After more than 25 years of incorporation, the City is transitioning from a growth city to a maintenance city. While there are several opportunities for large developments remaining throughout the community, the majority of developable vacant properties are considered to be smaller infill projects. The City wishes to remain fiscally prudent and maintain a healthy fiscal and economic balance, and evaluate land development potential, and economic opportunity throughout the City. On June 24, 2014, at the recommendation of the Infill Land Use Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tern Naggar, the City Council entered into an agreement with Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) for economic consulting services to conduct a land use economic opportunity study throughout the City. The City seeks to determine whether the existing General Plan land use designations for the remaining vacant land will enable the City to maximize economic opportunity for the community. As a part of this study, Keyser Marston Associates has updated a previous market assessment for Old Town, originally prepared by KMA in 1998. The 1998 Market Opportunities Study drove the vision of Old Town and greatly affected its success and image today. The primary objectives of the Market Opportunities Study Update are tri -fold: • To evaluate the progress achieved since 1998 • To assess market potential for additional development • To recommend implementation strategies to further improve Old Town Progress Achieved Since 1998 There have been many notable accomplishments in Old Town since the 1998 KMA Study. These include: • Reinforcing Old Town as Temecula's downtown • Development of new cultural uses • Installation of major public improvements • Completion of the Civic Center and Town Square Park • Development of significant office space • Development of multi - family units along Pujol Street • Old Town is widely recognized as a dining and entertainment district The City has entered into an agreement with a developer for the future development of the Town Square Marketplace, which will ultimately create a link between public gathering places and the Civic Center. The City has also invested heavily in public improvements throughout Old Town such as streetscape improvements, bike lanes, and sharrows. However many streets still lack curb, gutter, and sidewalks. While the Murrieta Creek Regional Plan has been improved, the plan is a long term planning project. There has been little progress on the formation of an Old Town Business Improvement District or the development of a major new hotel within the district. Market Demand Forecast KMA developed long term forecasts for each major land use in Old Town, based on Citywide and regional trends, demographics, and projected future development. Over the next twenty years, Old Town can absorb approximately 330,000 square feet of office space, 250,000 square feet of retail, 750 hotel rooms, and 2,100 residential units. Conversely, the remaining supply of various land uses is 809,000 square feet of office, 485,000 square feet of retail, 540 hotel rooms, and 1,800 residential units. These projections result in a relative disequilibrium of supply (development capacity) and demand (absorption) of land uses. At year twenty of KMA's analysis, Old Town is predicted to have a 479,000 square feet oversupply of office space, a 235,000 square foot oversupply of retail space, undersupply of 210 hotel rooms, and undersupply of 300 residential units. This comparison suggests that the City should consider accommodating additional hotel and residential development within Old Town over the long term. Old Town Absorption Potential vs Development Capacity Summary of Best Practices from Comparable Districts KMA surveyed five comparable mixed -use village districts throughout California and identified best practices that have led to success in Little Italy (San Diego), Carlsbad, Chico, Windsor, and Petaluma. These locations were based on similarities in land use mix, scale, arts and culture uses, and proximity to wine country. The best practices include: Encouraging the formation of a Business Improvement District to support coordinated marketing efforts and special events Establishing a parking in -lieu fee program to enhance the feasibility of in -fill projects Average Annual Projected Old Town Remaining Oversupply/ Absorption 20 Year Absorption Development (Undersupply) (Midpoint) (midpoint) Capacity at Year 20 Office 16,500 SF 330,000 SF 809,000 SF 479,000 SF Retail 485,000 SF 250,000 SF 485,000 SF 235,000 SF Hotel 540 Rooms 750 Rooms 540 Rooms (210) Rooms Residential 1,800 Units 2,100 Units 1,800 Units (300) Units Summary of Best Practices from Comparable Districts KMA surveyed five comparable mixed -use village districts throughout California and identified best practices that have led to success in Little Italy (San Diego), Carlsbad, Chico, Windsor, and Petaluma. These locations were based on similarities in land use mix, scale, arts and culture uses, and proximity to wine country. The best practices include: Encouraging the formation of a Business Improvement District to support coordinated marketing efforts and special events Establishing a parking in -lieu fee program to enhance the feasibility of in -fill projects • Forming partnerships with business and non - profit organizations to promote Old Town • Incorporating signage and gateway monumentation accentuating the district's theme • Promoting the creation of inviting, clean, and safe public spaces • Enhancing outdoor experience with lighting, seating, shade structures, outdoor dining • Permitting live outdoor music at select restaurants and bars • Engaging HOAs to inform residents of planned events Recommended Opportunities and Strategies Keyser Marston identified four umbrella strategies to optimize opportunity for the district Branding Old Town Old Town has successfully developed numerous restaurants, coffee shops, bars, and music venues, however is not recognized as an important dining destination. Old Town has an opportunity to enhance the business environment and visitor experience by developing and marketing a "foodie district" brand. Secondary branding concepts could include health and wellness, arts and culture, and entertainment. Developing a "foodie district" requires more than a critical mass of farm to table and fine dining restaurants. An essential feature of a "foodie district" is a market hall; essentially a year round, under roof farmers market, food court, and culinary institute in one. Some popular examples of market halls include Granville Island in Vancouver, Grand Central Market in Los Angeles, Anaheim Packing District, and Reading Terminal Station in Philadelphia. Given the concentration of restaurants in Old Town, and the proximity to wine country, plus the burgeoning micro - brewery sector, the "foodie district" theme celebrates the community's identity, history, and culture, while also playing to its strengths. New Private Development Potential Town Square Marketplace: The City is currently in negotiations to develop this City- owned, one acre property adjacent to City Hall. Development of this site will activate and enhance Town Square Park and will bring Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street closer together. It is a missing link to establish Main Street as the important heart of Old Town. Boutique Hotel: Existing overnight accommodations in Old Town are very limited in number, selection, and amenities. Development of one or more new hotels at the midscale or upscale level can have a transformational impact on the district. Market Rate Housing: The former Redevelopment Agency was successful in stimulating the development of multi - family and mixed use developments within the core of Old Town and along Pujol Street. However, currently all of these housing units have been restricted as affordable rentals. KMA recommends that the City encourage additional market rate housing in Old Town, including both for sale and rental units. Improvements to the Public Realm Murrieta Creek Regional Trail: The completion of the Murrieta Creek Trail may have a transformational effect on Old Town by enhancing both the natural and commercial environments by creating a visual and functional connection between Murrieta Creek and Old Town. Gateways and Streetscape: The north and south ends of Old Town are marked by arches spanning the streets. KMA recommends that the City and Old Town incorporate signage and monumentation that accentuate Old Town's themes and enhance the outdoor experience with improved lighting and seating. The City may wish to consider parklets and plazuelas, as well as additional street furniture. Parking: As Old Town builds out, the availability of shared public parking will diminish. The southern end of Old Town is currently well served by both surface parking and the Civic Center garage. The City may wish to revisit the parking study completed by Fehr and Peers in 2010 and incorporate parking strategies for additional parking toward the north end of Old Town. South Side Mixed Use Development: The southern entrance to Old Town is unattractive today, with a mix of commercial, industrial, and vacant land uses stretching approximately one mile from Temecula Parkway. The City may wish to explore options to rezone the corridor and encourage mixed use development. Marketing and Promotion Strategies Potential for a Business Improvement District: KMA recommends the formation of a Business Improvement District (BID) in Old Town. A BID works to unify business and property owners within a particular district to work towards the common goal of economic revitalization. This is often conducted through marketing and event programs, beautification projects, commercial tenant recruitment, and parking and transportation improvements. Co- Marketing with Wineries / Pechanga: The unique, big draws in the Temecula Valley are the wineries, Pechanga Resort and Casino, and Old Town. Old Town can enhance its regional success through co- marketing efforts with these organizations. There is a high demand for visitor lodging in Temecula with over 34,000 visitors using hotel services each month. Old Town has the potential to increase its capture of visitors and spending in the Temecula Valley by co- marketing and branding Old Town as a "foodie district' and an extension of the existing wineries. Old Town should complement existing promotional efforts of the wineries by emphasizing farm to table culinary arts, and allowing visitors and residents to experience the organic nature of Temecula Valley. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. 4 ITEM NO.3 Consideration of Multi -Way Stop Signs Mercedes Street at Third Street AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: I Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works /City Engineer DATE: October 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Item 3 Consideration of Multi -Way Stop Signs — Mercedes Street at Third Street PREPARED BY: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing Multi -Way Stop Signs at the intersection of Mercedes Street at Third Street. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of September 24, 2015, the Commission directed Staff to evaluate the feasibility of modifying the ingress /egress circulation at the Old Town Garage parking structure in lieu of establishing a Multi -Way Stop Control at the intersection of Mercedes Street and Third Street. Specifically the request was to restrict egress at the Third Street intersection by only allowing one - way ingress to the parking structure. The one -way egress to the parking structure would be relocated to the driveway at the Mercedes Street and Second Street intersection, which is a "knuckle" intersection. Staff has reviewed the requested circulation alternative. Shown below are the Pros and Cons associated with the ingress /egress modification at the Mercedes Street and Third Street intersection. Pros • Eliminates potential vehicular conflicts exiting the parking structure at Third Street • Eliminates visibility concerns for parking structure egress traffic (westbound traffic) • Reduces conflicts between pedestrians crossing the driveway and westbound egress vehicles Cons • Does not address the limited visibility on the west leg of the intersection for eastbound vehicles • Does not address the conflicts between pedestrians and northbound /southbound vehicles • Does not provide a controlled crossing for pedestrians exiting the parking structure at the intersection • Does not improve the visibility of pedestrians crossing at the intersection • Loss of approximately 17 on -site parking spaces due to reconfiguration of drive aisle from two - way to one -way operation on the ground level • One -way circulation will require motorists to exit the parking structure, if a parking space is not found on the ground level, and re- enterthe parking structure seeking spaces on second orthird levels • On -site directional signing will have to be modified to direct vehicles to exit at the Second Street/Mercedes Street intersection • Requires reconfiguration of Third Street driveway to eliminate egress aisle • Requires reconfiguration of Second Street driveway to eliminate ingress drive aisle • Reconfiguration may require a multi -way stop sign at the Second Street and Old Town Front Street intersection, which would ultimately affect the operation of the signalized intersection at Old Town Front Street and Santiago Road /Frist Street • Eliminates ingress to on -site parking lot located at the south -end of the parking structure on Mercedes Street • Requires Truax building patrons and employees to enter structure at Third Street to access south -end parking lot • Eliminates ingress to City secured parking lot from Second Street and Mercedes Street • Requires City Vehicles to enter structure at Third Street to access City secured lot located in the basement Although the modification of the ingress and egress to the parking structure sounds like a simple alternate solution to a multi -way stop control, the list shown above indicates that a potential circulation modification would introduce other issues that could affect the operation and integrity of the parking structure. It is Staffs opinion that the circulation modification would be an expensive endeavor in terms of the signing, striping and driveway modifications and result in the sacrificing of much needed parking spaces in the parking structure and the Old Town Temecula business district. Moreover, the proposed alternative does nothing to address the current visibility constraints on the remaining legs of the intersection nor does it address the need for a safe controlled pedestrian crossing on Mercedes Street. The Commission's consideration of multi -way stop signs at the intersection maintains the integrity of the parking structure and the Old Town Specific Plan, addresses the visibility issues, and provides a controlled crossing for pedestrians traveling to and from the parking structure. Therefore, Staff recommends the Commission approve the recommendation that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing Multi -Way Stop signs at the intersection of Mercedes Street at Third Street. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with installing signs and associated pavement markings. Adequate funds are available in the Traffic Division's operating budget. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" — Location Map EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP „r J Location Map - Mercedes Street at Third Street ft. center: 6288185, 2124326 is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or reliable. THIS IVAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Legend G city N ate 0 Percale Aerial 2012 Scale: 1:2,590 ITEM NO.4 Reschedule Public /Traffic Safety Commission Meetings of November and December, 2015 AGENDA REPORT TO: PubliGTraffic Safety Commission FROM: Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works /City Engineer DATE: October 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Item 4 Reschedule PubliGTraffic Safety Commission Meetings of November and December 2015 Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Direct Staff to cancel and reschedule the regular meetings for November and December 2015, and perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements per the Government Code. BACKGROUND: Due to the upcoming November and December 2015 Holiday Season, it is recommended that the Commission consolidate the meetings of November 26, 2015 and December 24, 2015 into one (1) meeting, to be scheduled Thursday, December 10, 2015. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent — PW Street DATE: October 1, 2015 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for September, 2015 CC: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer — Capital Improvements Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer — Land Development Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer — Traffic Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of September, 2015. The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by both in house crews and maintenance contractors. Attachments: Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division Street Maintenance Contractors Detail Report Contracted Maintenance Work Completed Graffiti Removal Chart MEMORANDUM month of September, 2015: 1. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 110 B. Total signs installed 21 C. Total signs repaired 99 D. Banners Replaced 2 H. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 85 Ill. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 1288 B. Total Tons 2.5.5 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 77 B. Down Spouts 6 C. Under sidewalks 212 D. Bowls 8 V. RIGHT -OF -WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0 Vt. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 112 B. Total S.F. 1796 VII. STENCILING A. 68 New and Repainted Legends B. 1510 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 0 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic E. I RPMs Installed R 11AwrlAIV,'0AI rem Also, City Maintenance stalfresponded to 73 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sigm repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 53 service order requests for the month of August, 2015. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 72.5 hours of overtime which includes standby Lime, special events and response to street emergencies. 'mc told cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors- lirr the 111011111 ofScptc:mber, 2015 was $0 compared to $11,573.00 for the month ol'August, 2015. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5,101 Account No. 999 -5402 Electronic Copies: Tom Garcia, City Eugiucer Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Mayta De La Torre. Senior Engineer Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer Judy McNabb, Admin. Assistant Director of Public Works Capital Improvements Und Development Traffic Division R IMAEN 1 _AI1VIJOACCORP1' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2015 •2016 Date Submitted. October i. 2015 Submitted By Thomas Garcia Prepared By Rodney Tdeed!] 1STOUARTER Jul•16 15 89 /5 I FISCAL YEAR TO DATE SCOPE OF WORK UNI COq WORK COST WORK COST COST I WORK COST TOTAL COST FOR COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED I COMPLETED LAST FISCAL YEAR ASPHALT CONCRETE: Square Footage $297 2,427 f 7,201 1,892 I f 5,61914 1,288 I 3,825.36 j 5 607 $ 16,111 $ 743,1 17 Tons 61 55 25.5 i I 142 Parking Lot Slurry Seal Square Footage i Gallons i I PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE I _ Square Footage: 5297 0 f - 0 f 0 f 0 i f $ - PCC Yards. 0 0 0 I 1 0 i STRIPING L PAVEMENT MARKINGS: Red curb B Soloing (linear feet) $001 0 tf - 676 f 47.32 0 f - j 676 if 41.32 f 8,01920 Nei 8 Redamted Legends (each). $8,00 146 f 1,108.00 148 f 1.184.00 0 S 1 294 f 2,35200 $ 18,59200 Bull Noses (each) $007 0 $ - 0 f 0 f 1 0 f $ 4284 Raised Pavement Markers -RPM'. (earn) 0 0 i 0 0 0 Thermo Plastic Legends (each) 0 0 0 I I 0 t 0 SIGNS 8 BANNERS No of Signs REPLACED $26.39 69 f 1,820.91 134 $ 3,53636 110 3 2,802.911 1 313 f 8,260.07 $ 16,1T/ W Material (cost per sign) f50.00 f 34.50.00 8,700.00 If 5,500.00 f 15,650,00 $ 30,6111 No of Signs INSTALLED. $2639 20 $ 527.80 23 �$ 1 $ 606.97 21 if 554.191 64 '$ 1,688.% f 9,31567 Material trust per sign). $5000 $ 1,00000 �f 1,15000 �f 1,1150.Wi f 3,200.00 E 17,650.00 No&Signs REPAIRED $26.39 40 $ 1,055.60 87 1$ 2,29593 99 if 2,812.811 226 It 5.964.14 $ 11,690.77 Material(cout per sign). $50.00 $ 2,000.00 �f 4,350.00 i$ 4,950.00: f 11,300.00 $ 22,150.00 No of BANNERS metalled $2639 71 f 1,873.69 0 f - 2 j $ 52.78 j 73 f 1,926.47 $ 18,393.63 Lnnsmsa WraNM Installed V6,39 0 0 f 0 I 0 $ 614.48 GRAFFITI REMOVAL _ I No df Locations % 104 112 1 314 3347 Square Footage 1,798 3.776 1,7% 7.370 31884 DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANED Catch Basins 326.39 40 : f 1,055.60 48 f 1,266.72 77 f 2.032.031 165 f 4,354.35 is Sill 9 Deen Drain. $26.39 0 f 0 $ - 6 f 155.311 6 $ 168.34 $ 2,66539 Under sidewalk Drains 82639 0 jf 0 f - 212 $ 5,594.681 212 I$ 5,594.6 $ 12,244% Detention Basins $2639 6 $ 1561 0 $ - 8 � f 211.12 1 14 t f 36!.46 $ 2,82373 Brkge Deck Dennis $2639 0 $ - 0 f - 0 $ - 1 0 $ - TREES TRIMMED t No of Trees Trimmed $26.39 86 f 2,269.54 26 $ 738.92 85 $ 2,243.151 199 $ 5,261.61 is 17.17989 R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT t l Area Abated (square leap $0034 80 �f 2.00 1.200 $ 40.50 0 {f - � 1,260 if 42.64 f 53550 _ t The SOON MainlerrNtw DhOled n WOO repantb t BaWlw re pleat for • variety of other feNNte, the toll member Of 8ervke Orl Requests, some N vAtkh Ircgude work ropeMO show Is ropoft8 rnmMly. SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS I No of SORB 53 53 ., 105 8555 Puawa er essigrad to the 8hal MNrAanrrca Belli aro mull ertd mpan0 t MN hours amNganeW N NrPport City epNMped event Ni 1 Overtime Hours $3959 186 I f 7,363.74 56 is 2,29612 0 $ - 244 is 9,859.% S 37,30288 - -- I TOTALS: 5,161 IS 30,963.46 0,282 j 2803236 3,842 j$ 25,081.311 17,m5 S 92.472.99 f 337,702 35 R: NAINTAINIMOACRPTV OLV AUG SEPT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS "The following contractors have pet ronned the following projects for the month of September, 2015 DATE ACCOUNT STREET /CHANNEBRIDGE U DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOTAL CO ST IM CONTRACTOR: Date: # 1� A T/A TOTAL COST Date: a TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: Date: # TOTAL COST Date: # TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: Date: q TOTAL COST Date: a TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: Date: TOTAL COST Date: TOTAL, COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5412 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99 -5402 R IMAiNT AINWOA('TNR DEPARTMENT 0F PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED FISCAL YEAR 2D15-2V16 Date Submitted: October ,,zo1s Submitted By: Thomas Garcia Prepared By: Rodney Tidwell SCOPE OF WORK JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Year to Date ASPHALT CONCRETE ANNUALSPRAYS Annual Spraying of Pre/Post Herbicides $ $ $ $ $ $ Annual Spraying of Pre/Post Emergent $ $ - $ $ $ $ DRAINAGE FACILITIES STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS Legends(each) 0 TREES WEED ABATEMENT ROW Area Abated (Square Feet) ___—O 0 -0 0 Other Public Lands Abated (Square Feet) _O 0 0 0 0 0 0 MISC. MAINT ACTIVITIES Repair Roadway Cost A TOTAL CONTRACTED MAINT COSTS =$1,610.00 $ 1 11,�56703.'000 =NONJE$ Is - Is 13,143.00 nWmNr^wmw0mCn,ruuc/rnpoDEC CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL FISCAL YEAR 2015 -2016 Month I Number Square of Calls Footage Jul 98 1,798 Aug 104 3,776 Sep 112 1,796 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals 314 7,370 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 w LL d 2,000 m 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun •Square ■Number Footage of Calls 120 100 80 N A V 60 0 0 z 40 20 0 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT SOUTHWEST STATION To: Southwest Station Admin From: Marianna Kuhn. Crime analyst Date October 2. 2015 Re: Part 1 crimes for the City of Temecula for September 1 — 30, 2015 Total part 1 calls for service: 304 SO iX 50 0 ■ Aggravated Arson Burglary Larceny Theft Rape Robbery Assault ■ Total 23 1 33 204 1 4 UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category. This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category. Data was obtained using Data warehouse. If you need any additional assistance in regards to this request, please do not hesitate to ask. Thanks. CITY OF TEMECULA TRAFFIC STATISTICS AUGUST 2015 Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 820 Total Non - Hazardous Citations 339 Parking Citations 323 Total Citations 1482 Citation Breakdown S. L.A.P. 67 N.E.T. Citations 52 School Zones 81 Seatbelt Citations 32 Community Presentations 0 Traffic Collisions Non -Injury 30 Hit and Run 11 Injury 16 Fatal 0 Total 57 Pedestrian Related Collisions 2 Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police report. D.U.I. Arrests D.U.I. Arrests 13 Cell Phone Cites Total cell phone cites 74 (23123 & 23124 CVC) Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints / "Click it or Ticket' Operations 08/22/15: Motorcycle safety enforcement 08/01/15- 08/31/15: 123 hours of DUI Saturation patrol 08/12/15: DUI Warrant sweep operation Prepared September 3, 2015 Deputy Joe Narciso Commission Members October 7, 2015 City of Temecula Public /Traffic Safety Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Ref: Public /Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Division Activities /Events Dear Commission Members; Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of September, 2015. These activities include the following: • Citation statistics (attachment) • Part 1 Crimes (attachment) • Community Action Patrol supported call -outs: None. • Community Action Patrol activity / patrol hours: 895 hours for September, 2015. Year -to -date total: 8,258 hours. *There were 41 CAP patrols with 56 members participating. • Training: At the monthly CAP meeting. • Special Events: 09/05/15 DUI /Driver License Checkpoint -Ynez Road X DLR Drive 09/21 through 09/24/15 Bloodhound Training- Cabazon Station • Call -outs: 09/25/15 Traffic fatality -Vail Ranch Pkwy, near Johnston Drive 09/29/15 Traffic fatality- Rancho Vista -East of Ynez Road • CAP Meetings: 9/10/15- CAP general membership meeting /training. • Radar Trailer Deployments: 9/9 thru 9/16/15 9 /21 thru 9/28/15 9 /21 thru 9/28/15 9/28 th ru 40413 Amesbury Ln. at Brandon Ln. 5,596 vehicles Loma Linda at Elderberry aprox 24,783 vehicles 29999 Ynez Rd. 46655 Peachtree 41,652 vehicles not available If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula Police Department, Traffic Division — (951) 696 -3000. Sincerely, Deputy Joe Narciso Temecula Police Department Traffic Division FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics John R. Hawkins Fire Chief 10/7/2015 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIs Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion, Station, Jurisdiction Incidents Reported for the month of September,2015 and Temecula City Page 1 of 6 'Incidents are shovrtm based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Response Activity Incidents Reported for the month of September,2015 and Temecula City •Com Fire 1 0.1% a False AWrm 54 6.0% 0 Her Mal 5 1.2% ■ Met 157 66.6% a Mush -Farr N." Fin 1 0.1% Omer Fire 6 0.9% ■Omer Misc 3 04116 Pud¢ 5enw b6it 36 5.3% Rng,ng Alarm 3 04% ■ SWMby 12 1.8% 0 Lamc CAsi 84 124% Vehicle Fee 2 0.3116 wldand Fire 2 0.3% Total 679 100.0% Com Fire 1 False Alarm 54 Haz Mat 6 Medical 467 Multi•Fam Dwelling Fire 1 Other Fire 6 Other Misc 3 Public Service Assist 36 Ringing Alarm 3 Standby 12 Traffic Collision 84 Vehicle Fire 2 Wildland Fire 2 Incident Total: 679 Average Enroute to Onscene Time- Enroute Time = When a unit has been acknowledged as responding. Onscene Time = When a unit has been acknowledge as being on ne For ant, other statistic outside Enroute to Onscene please contact the IT Help Desk at 951 - 940 -6900 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 458 150 17 2 4.2 73.0% The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average time HZM, HZMMC, OAC, OAF, OAM, OAMAD, OAMAI, OAMTE, OAMVA, OAP, OAR, OAV, OUT, OOU, LEB, LEO, LEI, BRNPMT, DES, PAA, PAD, PAF, PAO, PAP, HFS, HFSAM, HFSCA, HSBT, HSBTC, HSBTS, HSBTV, HSE, HSG Last updated 10/7/2015 3 Page 2 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response limes for all units only the first unit in Last Updated 10/712015 3 Page 3 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction Conn False Haz Mat Medical Multi -Fa Other Other Public Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildlan Fire Alarm m Fire Misc Service Alarm Collisio Fire d Fire Station 12 e,nec.la 0 11 2 89 0 2 2 1 2 0 27 0 2 Temecula Station Taal 0 11 2 89 0 2 2 1 2 0 27 0 2 Station 73 Rancho ..i��..,da 0 27 2 126 0 1 0 12 1 3 19 1 0 California Station Total 0 27 2 126 0 1 0 12 1.,_.Y_.__a ' Station 83 French Temecula 0 0 1 6 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Valley Reatlon Tar o 0 1 6 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Station 84 �e;:,da 0 8 2 133 0 1 1 11 0 5 19 1 0 Parkview Station Tar 0 8 2 133 0 1 1 11 0 6 19 1 0 Station 92 Won ie�newla 1 8 1 113 1 0 0 11 0 4 19 0 C Creek futlon Tatty 1 8 1 113 1 0 0 11 0 4 19 _,:. Last Updated 10/712015 3 Page 3 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in Last Updated 10/7/2015 3 Page 4 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Jurisdiction Wildland Com Fire False Maz Mat Medical Multi -Fa Other Other Public Ringing standby Traffic Vehicle Alarm m Fire Misc Service Alarm Collision Fire Fire ein777 1 54 8 467 1 6 3 36 3 12 84 2 2 Last Updated 10/7/2015 3 Page 4 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Supervisorial District - Summary DISTRICT 3 JEFF STONE Com Fire 1 False Alarm 54 Haz Mat 8 Medical 467 Multi -Fam Dwelling Fire 1 Other Fire 6 Other Misc 3 Public Service Assist 36 Ringing Alarm 3 Standby 12 Traffic Collision 84 Vehicle Fire 2 Wildland Fire 2 Last Updated 10/7/2015 3 Page 5 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. MONTH = () and YEAR = 2015 and CITYNAME = 'Temecula' U o A4 "0 dp, 3 vUW jr 6 0 vo 4u 0 ., 0 47 9 V4, 0 C0 At 9 j 4( Y, Kkh^m6AL wsItvrj Anv KV 4P '4, • Pa h Fre v 001. M.. -,,e+sC.Count, AA Fire Stator Haz Mat O P.", Se..i.c A.... a.,h "'.. I hwascal Last Updated 101712015 3 Page 6 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 p�JpQ� °QJpp� `SpP`s pQQ ek l�aE �a pJ�JSti Q���O�P oCoO�e F 52 O Opp 1 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2014 vs. 2015 MONTH 2014 YTD 2015 Y T) JANUARY 612 660 FEBRUARY 546 584 MARCH 614 640 APRIL 560 678 MAY 639 714 JUNE 581 626 JULY 586 614 AUGUST 594 646 SEPTEMBER 620 679 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL '1'0 DA 11 5352 5841 1112014 YTD ❑ 2015 YTD 2015 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals PUBLIC SAFETY CLASS TOTALS 2015 Class Totals Ian Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total CPR AED 75 38 34 542 25 47 93 117 49 1020 FIRSPAID 77 22 9 0 13 29 34 81 IB 283 PEDIATRIC FIRST AID 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 5 HCP 21 So 0 5 0 0 1 7 0 84 STAFF HCP 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 13 CERT 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 33 TEEN CERT 1 o 1 0 1 35 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 35 Total 180 111 78 583 38 79 128 208 68 0 0 0 1473 INCIDENT /RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2015 Incident Response Totals Ian Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7 FALSE ALARM 76 50 45 72 68 65 64 72 54 566 HAZ MAT 3 6 4 5 5 3 4 2 8 40 MEDICAL AID 444 412 464 471 502 447 444 450 467 4101 MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 OTHER FIRE 6 3 8 5 7 8 7 12 6 62 OTHER MISC. 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 2 1 3 14 PSA 48 33 1 20 30 24 32 30 27 36 280 RINGING ALARM 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 3 10 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 9 RESCUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STANDBY 8 9 11 5 6 6 6 16 12 81 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 71 62 70 77 87 58 49 60 84 626 VEHICLE FIRE 1 0 1 5 2 3 1 3 1 2 18 WILDLAND FIRE 0 1 0 7 6 1 3 3 2 23 Total 660 584 640 678 1 714 626 614 646 679 0 0 0 5841 20W 18W 16W 14W 12W IOW 800 6W 4W 2W 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 2014 vs. 2015 O tiP ■ 2014 V10 13011 5 YTO 40 MONTH 2014 YTD 2015 YTD ANUARY 1131 180 FEBRUARY 65 111 MARCH 98 78 APRIL 81 583 MAY 76 38 UNE 100 79 ULY 85 128 AUGUST 161 208 SEPTEMBER 88 68 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL TO DATE 1885 1473