HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-05 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 15 -05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVE
A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA13 -0141,
A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(PA07 -0200) AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PA07-
0202) FOR THE TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL TO
RELOCATE A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED HELISTOP TO
TWO NEW LOCATIONS INCLUDING AN INTERIM
LOCATION FOR USE DURING PRELIMINARY PROJECT
PHASES AND A PERMANENT LOCATION ON THE ROOF
OF A FUTURE HOSPITAL TOWER TO BE
CONSTRUCTED DURING A LATER PHASE AND TO
CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 5,000 SQUARE
FOOT SINGLE STORY STORAGE BUILDING TO BE
LOCATED AT THE SITE OF THE PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED HELISTOP. THE 35.3 ACRE HOSPITAL SITE
IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
TEMECULA PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET
WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD (A.P.N. 959 - 080 - 026)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On June 30, 2004, Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc.
( "UHS "), filed Planning Application No. PA04 -0462, a General Plan Amendment; on
October 12, 2005 filed PA05 -0302, a Zone Change to PDO -9 (Planned Development
Overlay -9); on June 30, 2005 filed PA04 -0463, a Conditional Use Permit and
Development Plan; and on November 4, 2004 filed PA04 -0571, a Tentative Parcel
Map, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property
consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway
79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 959 - 080 -001 through 959 - 080 -004 and 959 - 080 -007 through 959 - 080 -010
( "Project ").
B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ").
C. On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or
opposition to this matter.
D. The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general
public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this
Project.
E. On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning
Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental
Impact Report for the Project.
F. A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October
28, 2005.
G. On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning
Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did
testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06 -01
recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for
the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project.
I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 06 -04, recommending approval of the Conditional
Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04- 0463).
J. On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing
as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report at which time all
persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final
Environmental Impact Report.
K. On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the
City Council and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution
No. 06 -05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA04 -0462 (GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT) PA05 -0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04 -0463 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04 -0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP)
AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF
APPROXIMATELY 35.31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959 - 080 -001 THROUGH 959 - 080 -004
AND 959 - 080 -007 THROUGH 959 - 080 -010 (PA04 -0462, PA05 -0302, PA04 -0463,
PA04- 0571)."
L. On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered the Conditional Use
Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04 -0463) at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
M. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 06 -07, approving the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for
the Project (PA04- 0463).
N. On February 24, 2006, the California Nurses Association and Citizens
Against Noise and Traffic each filed a separate petition challenging the City of
Temecula's approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital project proposed by Universal
Health Services, Inc.
O. On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court ordered that the
City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, including without limitation, its
certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and all related approvals and
permits, until the City of Temecula has taken the actions necessary to bring the Project
into compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA "). The Riverside
County Superior Court ruled in favor of the California Nurses Association and Citizens
Against Noise and Traffic, holding that: (1) the MTBE plume was not properly analyzed
in the Final Environmental Impact Report; (2) the siren noise at the hospital was
significant and should have been mitigated; and (3) not all feasible traffic mitigation
measures were adopted for cumulative traffic impacts.
P. The Riverside County Superior Court also held that the Final
Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare,
and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources;
(4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency.
Q. On July 12, 2007, another scoping session was held to determine the
extent of issues to be addressed in the new Environmental Impact Report for the
Project.
R. In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a new
Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and
circulated for public review from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007.
S. On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning
Application Nos. PA07 -0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07 -0199 (Zone Change),
PA07 -0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07 -0200 (Development Plan), PA07 -0201
(Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference,
for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north
side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959 - 080 -001 through 959 - 080 -004 and 959 - 080 -007
through 959 - 080 -010 ( "Project "), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify
either in support of or opposition to this matter.
T. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08 -01 recommending
that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project
and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project.
U. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 08 -04, recommending approval of the
Development Plan (PA07- 0200).
V. On January 22, 2008, the City Council reminded and invalidated its
approvals of Planning Application Nos. PA04 -0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-
0302, Zone Change to PDO -9 (Planned Development Overlay -9); PA04 -0463,
Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04 -0571, Tentative Parcel Map
for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north
side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959 - 080 -001 through 959 - 080 -004 and 959 - 080 -007
through 959 - 080 -010.
W. On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered the Development Plan
(PA07 -0200) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the
City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support
or opposition to this matter.
X. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due
consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08 -10,
entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO
CERTIFY THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED
FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, ADOPT FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPT A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE TEMECULA
REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA
PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF
MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959 -080-
001 THROUGH 959 - 080 -004 AND 959 - 080 -007 THROUGH 959 - 080 -010 (PA07 -0198,
PA07 -0199, PA07 -0200, PA07 -0201, PA07- 0202). The new Final Environmental
Impact Report (FEIR) and mitigation monitoring reporting program accurately addresses
the impacts associated with the adoption of this Resolution.
Y. On June 18, 2010, Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc.,
filed Planning Application No. PA10 -0194, a Major Modification Application in a manner
in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
Z. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
AA. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on December 15, 2010, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had
an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
BB. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10-
28 recommending that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA10 -0194
and adopt an addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the project.
CC. On February 8, 2011, the City Council considered Planning Application
No. PA10 -0194 (Major Modification) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and di
testify either in support or opposition to this matter.
DD. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due
consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11 -17
approving Planning Application No. PA10 -0194 (Major Modification) and certifying an
addendum to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Major
Modification at a noticed public hearing.
EE. On May 31, 2013, Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc., filed
Planning Application No. PA13 -0141, a Major Modification Application to a
Development Plan (PA07 -0200) and Conditional Use Permit (PA07 -0202) for the
Temecula Valley Hospital to relocate the previously approved helistop to two new
locations including an interim location for use during preliminary project phases and a
permanent location on the roof of a future hospital tower to be constructed during a
later phase and to construct an approximately 5,000 square foot single story storage
building for non - hazardous material storage (including disaster supplies, linens, and
storage of excess construction materials to allow for repairs) to be located at the site of
the previously approved helistop.
FF. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
GG. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were
prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of
Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the SEIR as
required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House
from November 12, 2014 through December 26, 2014. Copies of the documents have
been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of
Community Development, located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590;
the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; and the City of Temecula
website.
HH. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on April 15, 2015, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had
an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Il. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve Planning Application No. PA13 -0141 subject to and based upon the
findings set forth hereunder.
JJ. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending that
the City Council approve the Application, hereby makes the following findings as
required by Section 17.05.030.E of the City of Temecula Municipal Code for a
development plan and by Section 17.04.010.E of the City of Temecula Municipal Code
for a Conditional Use Permit:
Development Code Findings (Section 17.05.030.E):
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of
Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of
the City;
The proposed Modification to a Development Plan is in conformance with the
goals and policies in the General Plan for the City of Temecula, the Development
Code, and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of
the City of Temecula. As designed and conditioned the project is consistent with
all applicable zoning ordinances, state laws and the General Plan. In addition,
the project is consistent with the development standards of the Development
Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO -9), including
setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public, health, safety and general welfare;
The overall development of the land has been designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare as the project has been designed to
minimize any adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and has been
reviewed and conditioned to comply with the General Plan, Development Code,
and uniform building and fire codes.
Conditional Use Permit Findings (Section 17.04.010.E):
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code;
The proposed Conditional Use Permit modification is consistent with the General
Plan and the Development Code. The proposal, a Major Modification to a
Development Plan (PA07 -0200) and Conditional Use Permit (PA07 -0202) for the
Temecula Valley Hospital to relocate the previously approved helistop to two new
locations including an interim location for use during preliminary project phases
and a permanent location on the roof of a future hospital tower to be constructed
during a later phase and to construct an approximately 5,000 square foot single
story storage building for non - hazardous material storage (including disaster
supplies, linens, and storage of excess construction materials to allow for repairs)
to be located at the site of the previously approved helistop is consistent with the
goals and policies contained in the General Plan and land use standards in the
Development Code. The goals and policies in the Land Use Element of the
General Plan encourage 'A diverse and integrated mix of residential,
commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses" (Goal 1);
'A City of diversified development character where rural and historical areas are
protected and co -exist with newer urban development" (Goal 3); and A City
compatible and coordinated with regional land use and transportation patterns"
(Goal 8). In addition, the project is consistent with the development standards of
the Development Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO -9),
including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional
use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures;
The proposed modifications to the hospital's Conditional Use Permit are
consistent with the previously approved helistop site with regard to the nature,
condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and affect
on the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. Although the Supplemental EIR
identifies "Substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity and exposure of persons to excessive noise levels'; it also
identifies that Section 9.20.030 (Noise Ordinance) of the Temecula Municipal
Code exempts sound emanating from "Public safety personnel in the course of
executing their official duties, including, but not limited to, sworn peace officers,
emergency personnel and public utility personnel. This exemption includes,
without limitation, sound emanating from all equipment used by such personnel,
whether stationary or mobile" and the Supplemental EIR identifies that limitations
on medical flights are not allowed pursuant to Public Utilities Section 21662.4.(a),
which states that aircraft flights for medical purposes are exempt from local
ordinances that restrict flight departures and arrivals to particular hours of the day
or night, or restrict flights due to noise. As such, the proposed project
modifications are compatible with the nature, condition and development of
adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use
modifications (exempting noise pursuant to Section 9.20.030 of the Temecula
Municipal Code and Section 21662.4.(a) of the Public Utilities Code) will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. Additionally, the
proposed storage building integrates into the hospital complex and is compatible
with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and
structures and will not adversely affect the adjacent hospital uses, buildings or
structures.
C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and
required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with
other uses in the neighborhood;
The site for the conditional uses, including the hospital buildings and helistop, is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking
and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in this development code and required by the planning commission or
council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The
project is in compliance with the development standards of the Development
Code and associated Planed Development Overlay (PDO -9), including setbacks,
parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height. The site is adequate in
size and shape to accommodate the proposed hospital facilities without affecting
the yard, parking and loading areas, landscaping, and other development
features prescribed in the Development Code.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health,
safety and general welfare of the community;
The Modification to the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the
health, safety and general welfare of the community. The purpose of the
Modification to the helistop location is to address Caltrans Division of Aeronautics
and Federal Aviation Administration safety concerns in a manner that minimizes
impacts to the surrounding community with regard to aesthetics, hazards, and
helicopter noise. As such, with regard to the helistop, the purpose of the
Modification to the use permit is specifically to redesign the helistop to ensure
that the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of
the community.
E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the
application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the
record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal;
The decision to recommend that the City Council conditionally approve the
proposed Modification to a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental finding and determinations in connection with the
recommendation for approval of Planning Application No. PA13 -0141, a Major
Modification to the Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the Temecula
Valley Hospital (the "Project').
A. On January 24, 2006, the City Council approved and certified the Final
Environmental Impact Report ( "FEIR ") for the Temecula Regional Hospital; on January
22, 2008, the City Council approved and certified the Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report ( "FSEIR ") for the Temecula Regional Hospital; and on February 8, 2011
the City Council approved and certified the Addendum to the Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report.
B. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff
prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the
Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit Major Modification Application (the
'Project'), as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that
study, City staff determined that the City determined that the proposed modifications to
the project did trigger conditions described in Sections 15162 and 15163 of the CEQA
Guidelines which require the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report (SEIR) and that a SEIR is appropriate for the proposed modifications to the
hospital project.
C. On November 25, 2013, a Notice of Preparation was released to all
agencies and persons that might be affected by the project.
D. On December 11, 2013, a scoping session was held at which time City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be
addressed in the SEIR for the Project.
E. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, City staff prepared a
SEIR analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development
Plan and Conditional Use Permit Major Modification, and described in the SEIR. Based
upon the finding contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial
evidence that the Project could result in new significant effects or increase the severity
of previously identified effects. The Supplemental EIR found that new circumstances do
exist that introduce new significant effects or increase the severity of previously
identified significant effects and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and
Statement of Overriding Considerations was prepared.
F. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the
public comment period and intent to adopt the SEIR as required by law. The public
comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from November 12, 2014
through December 26, 2014. Copies of the documents have been available for public
review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development,
located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library
located at 30600 Pauba Road; and the City of Temecula website.
G. Six written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a
response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning
Commission and Incorporated into the administrative record of proceedings.
H. The Planning Commission has reviewed the SEIR and corresponding
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding
Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at
the April 15, 2015 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1)
the SEIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding
Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial
evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to
helicopter noise; and (3) the SEIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and
Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment of the
Planning Commission.
The custodian of records for the FEIR, the SFEIR, the Addendum for the
modification application, and the second SFEIR and all other materials, which constitute
the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based, is
the Community Development Department of the City of Temecula. Those documents
are available for public review in the Planning Department located at the Planning
Department of the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
All legal prerequisites to the approval of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Major Modification Application to
a Development Plan (PA07 -0200) and Conditional Use Permit (PA07 -0202) for the
Temecula Valley Hospital to relocate the previously approved helistop to two new
locations including an interim location for use during preliminary project phases and a
permanent location on the roof of a future hospital tower to be constructed during a later
phase and to construct an approximately 5,000 square foot single story storage building
for non - hazardous material storage (including disaster supplies, linens, and storage of
excess construction materials to allow for repairs) to be located at the site of the
previously approved helistop on 35.3 acres generally located on the north side of
Temecula Parkway, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor
Parcel Number 959 - 080 -026, as set forth in Planning Application No. PA13 -0141,
subject to the specific Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 15th day of April, 2015.
ATTEST:
(N
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary
[SEAL.]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
ht, Chairt' an
I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. -05 was duly and regularly adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held
on the 15th day of April, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Harter, Kight, Telesio, Turley -Trejo
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Guerriero
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
I M110
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary