The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About041415 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 14, 2015 — 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. No Closed Session Next in Order: Ordinance: 15-04 Resolution: 15-19 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Prelude Music: Jamie Rector Invocation: Pastor William Rench of Calvary Baptist Church Flag Salute: Council Member Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Comerchero PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS DMV/Donate Life California Month Proclamation Certificates of Achievement Presented to Temecula Residents Participating in the Tri Valley Pageants 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of March 24, 2015 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of March 24, 2015. 3 Approve the List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: 2 RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2015 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2015. 5 Approve an Agreement with Environmental Science Associates (ESA) for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Audi Dealership RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve an agreement with Environmental Science Associates (ESA), in the amount of $142,250, for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Audi Dealership. 6 Approve an Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. for a Fiscal Impact Analysis for the Proposed Altair Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., in the amount of $35,000, for a Fiscal Impact Analysis for the proposed Altair Specific Plan. 7 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Esgil Corporation for Plan Check Services for Fiscal Year 2014-15 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Esgil Corporation, in the amount of $60,000, for a total agreement amount of $210,000, for Plan Check Services for Fiscal Year 2014-15. 8 Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with California Watershed Engineering Corporation (CWE) for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Pala Community Park), PW11-10 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with California Watershed Engineering Corporation (CWE), in the amount of $119,802, for environmental work associated with addressing bank erosion adjacent to Pala Community Park; 8.2 Authorize an increase to the contingency in the amount of $11,980. 3 9 Adopt Ordinance No. 15-03 Amending of Section 8.12.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code Concerning the Recovery of Abatement Expenses in Public Nuisance Actions (Second Reading) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: RECOMMENDATION: ORDINANCE NO. 15-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 8.12.140 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE RECOVERY OF ABATEMENT EXPENSES IN PUBLIC NUISANCE ACTIONS ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: CSD 15-01 Resolution: CSD 15-02 CALL TO ORDER: President Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Rahn, Edwards CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 10 Approve the Action Minutes of March 24, 2015 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of March 24, 2015. 11 Approve an Agreement with Margarita Officials Association for Sports Officiating Services RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the Board of Directors approve a five-year agreement with Margarita Officials Association, in the amount of $50,000 per year, for adult softball league and tournament officiating services. 5 12 Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Sherry Berry Music for Concession Services RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the Board of Directors approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Sherry Berry Music to extend the term to April 1, 2016, and to amend Payment Section 7 to maintain continuity for providing concession services at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. 13 Approval to Utilize Staff Support for West Coast Premiere Screening Event for Film Featuring Retired USMC Corporal Juan E. Dominguez in Temecula (At the Request of TCSD President Edwards) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 That the Board of Directors approve the utilization of staff for the planning and execution of the west coast film premiere in Retired USMC Corporal Juan E. Dominguez' (Purple Heart) hometown in the August —September time frame. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 28, 2015, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 6 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — No meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY — No meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY — No meeting 7 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 14 Approve a Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plans, and the Fiscal Year 2015-16 CDBG Annual Action Plan and Funding Recommendations RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 AND FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ANNUAL ACTION PLANS 14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2015-2016 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 Approve CR&R Residential Organics Recycling Program RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve the proposed Residential Organics Recycling Program as presented; 15.2 Direct staff to incorporate the rate for the Residential Organics Recycling Program into Solid Waste and Recycling Schedule of Rates and Charges; 8 15.3 Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Franchise Agreement with CR&R to reflect the proposed program and recent legislation affecting solid waste disposal and recycling mandates. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 28, 2015, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports and public Closed Session information) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694- 6444. 9 PRESENTATIONS 111�t , .%:. • w 7 11,W ■ E �_ �' lIICI!!1!!!!!ii!!!1!!1I!!!!! t' w ' ` 'moi ..•• ,_ .1 •Z-.----,_ ` Pr , , ► \\�\` gra r� ;' `Z� 1 1!!!"rf !• !!II!1!!!!!!!!! 1!!!. - __Th ,...... � -- .....;_ "� eCityofTemecula PROCLAMA WHEREAS, organ, tissue, marrow, and blood donation as expressions of compassion to those in need; and WHEREAS, millions of lives each year are saved marrow, and blood; and WHEREAS, a single individual's donation of the heart, intestine can save up to eight lives; donation of tissue and a single blood donation can help three people in need; WHEREAS, more than 21,000 individuals in California transplant waiting list and every 90 minutes one person shortage of donated organs; and WHEREAS, more than 600,000 units of blood per and WHEREAS, the spirit of giving and decision to condition; and WHEREAS, nearly 12 million Californians have signed California Registry to ensure their wishes to be organ and WHEREAS, California residents can sign up with applying for or renewing their driver's licenses or ID Vehicles. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jeff Comerchero, on behalf do hereby proclaim the month of April, 2015 to be "DMV/Donate Life California TI N are life-giving acts recognized worldwide and healed by donors of organs, tissues, lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas, and small can save and heal the lives of up to 50 others; and are currently on the national organ dies while waiting for a transplant, due to the year are needed to meet the need in California; donate are not restricted by age or medical up with the state -authorized Donate Life tissue donors are honored; and the Donate Life California Registry when cards at the California Department of Motor of the City Council of the City of Temecula, Month" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this fourteenth day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Achievement Presented on behalf of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Temecula to: Kathyvens We proudly commend Kathy for being crowned Ms. Temecula Elite of Tri Valley Pageants and wish her great success in her future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Achievement Presented on behalf of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Temecula to: Chloe Rogers We proudly commend Chloe for being crowned Miss Temecula of Tri Valley Pageants and wish her great success in her future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Achievement Presented on behalf of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Temecula to: Sidney We proudly commend Sidney for being crowned Teen Temecula of Tri Valley Pageants and wish her great success in her future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Achievement Presented on behalf of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Temecula to: Sara Blanchard We proudly commend Sara for being crowned Jr. Teen Temecula of Tri Valley Pageants and wish her great success in her future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Achievement Presented on behalf of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Temecula to: Reagan Ring We proudly commend Reagan for being crowned Pre -Teen Temecula of Tri Valley Pageants and wish her great success in her future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Certificate of Achievement Presented on behalf of the City Council and the Citizens of the City of Temecula to: Shannon Shen We proudly commend Shannon for being crowned Ambassador Temecula of Tri Valley Pageants and wish her great success in her future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this fourteenth day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MARCH 24, 2015 — 7:00 PM 6:00 PM - The City Council convened in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: 1. Conference with Real Property Negotiators. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding four parcels of real property owned by the City of Temecula/Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency consisting of approximately 1 acre (APN 922-360-004, 005, 006 & 007) located on Main Street at Mercedes Street in the City of Temecula. The parties to the negotiations for the potential sale of the property are: Truax Development and the City of Temecula. Negotiators for Truax Development are: Bernard L. Truax 11, Ross Jackson and Gary Thornhill; negotiators for the City of Temecula are: Aaron Adams, Greg Butler, Armando Villa and Luke Watson. Under negotiation are price and terms for the potential development and sale of the property. 2. Conference with Legal Counsel—Existing Litigation. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) with respect to one matter of pending litigation: The People of the State of California and City of Temecula v. Cooperative Patient Services, et. al., Riverside County Superior Court No. RIC 1103777. At 6:00 P.M. Mayor Comerchero called the City Council meeting to order and recessed to Closed Session to consider the matters described on the Closed Session agenda. The City Council meeting convened at 7:04 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Prelude Music: Matthew Yang Invocation: Rabbi Yonasan Abrams of Chabad of Temecula Flag Salute: Council Member Mike Naggar ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Comerchero Action Minutes 032415 1 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS National Crime Victim's Rights Week Proclamation Youth in Government 2015 — Certificates of Participation WRCOG Annual Presentation PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual addressed the City Council: • Mark Katan CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of March 10, 2015 — Approved Staff Recommendation (3- 0-1, Council Member Comerchero abstained) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar and Rahn with Council Member Comerchero abstaining. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of March 10, 2015. 3 Approve the List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. Action Minutes 032415 2 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Receive Report Regarding Status of Upcoming Vacancies on Boards and Commissions - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council receive the report regarding the status of upcoming vacancies on Boards and Commissions. 5 Approve an Agreement with MGT of America, Inc. for State Mandate Cost Claiming Consulting Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve a four-year Agreement with MGT of America, Inc., in the amount of $11,000 annually, for a total four-year agreement amount of $44,000, to prepare State Mandated Cost (SB90) Claims and provide consulting services. 6 Approve Annual Records Destruction - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 15-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS Action Minutes 032415 3 7 Approve the Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement with the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Association for the "Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival" Event to be Held on May 29 — 31, 2015 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement with the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Association for $30,000, in-kind promotional services and the use of the Conference Center for a day to train volunteers valued at $3,865, and the use of traffic control devices valued at $3,200, for the 2015 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival to be held on May 29 — 31, 2015. 8 Approve an Agreement with Pacific Municipal Consultants for an Environmental Impact Report (EI R) for the Temecula Gateway Project - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement with Pacific Municipal Consultants, in the amount of $105,475, with a 10% contingency of $10,547.50, for a total agreement amount of $116,022.50, for an Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula Gateway Project. 9 Approve an Agreement with Reynolds Buick/GMC/Isuzu, Inc., for the Purchase of a GMC Sierra HD Truck 3/ Ton with Dump Bed and Equipment - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement with Reynolds Buick/GMC/Isuzu, Inc., in the amount of $42,719.40, for the purchase of a GMC Truck Sierra 2500 HD Dump Bed Regular Cab and Equipment. 10 Adopt Ordinance No. 15-02 Disestablishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District and Amending the Temecula Municipal Code By Deleting Chapter 3.40 In Its Entirety (Second Reading) - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. Action Minutes 032415 4 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 15-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DISESTABLISHING THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY DELETING CHAPTER 3.40 IN ITS ENTIRETY RECESS At 7:51 P.M., the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 7:58 P.M., the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 13 Consider Appointment of Mayor Pro Tempore as a Result of the Appointment of Former Council Member Chuck Washington to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion to appoint Council Member Naggar as Mayor Pro Tempore; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 That the City Council appoint a member to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for the remainder of the 2015 year. 14 Consider City Council Appointments to Committees as a Result of the Appointment of Former Council Member Chuck Washington to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion to appoint Council Member Naggar to the City Sustainability Program Committee, Council Member Comerchero to the Economic Development Committee, Council Member Rahn to the Southwest Cities Coalition Committee and Council Member Naggar to the Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 That the City Council appoint members to serve on certain designated committees deemed necessary for the purposes of conducting time -sensitive business, including but not limited to, the City Sustainability Program Committee, Economic Development Committee, Southwest Cities Coalition Committee and Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee. Action Minutes 032415 5 15 Consider Vacancy on the City Council as a Result of the Appointment of Former Council Member Chuck Washington to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors -Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Edwards made the motion to (1) fill the vacancy on the City Council by Council appointment based on the costs, timing and term considerations, (2) approve the application for appointment, related process and timeline as submitted, (2) authorize staff to advertise the vacancy and application process as submitted, (3) authorize staff to implement the necessary steps to conduct presentations, interviews and/or related tasks to fill the vacancy by City Council appointment, and (4) incorporate the following additional suggestions into the process: (A) create a process to shortlist applicants based on the number of applications received, (B) adjust the schedule, days and times based on the number of applications received, (C) conduct second interviews if necessary and/or desired, (D) provide information related to ex parte communications with applicants, and (E) provide the final redacted applications online; it was seconded by Council Member Naggar; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 That the City Council decide whether to fill the vacancy on the City Council by Council appointment or by a special election based on the costs, timing and term considerations for each option. The following individuals addressed the City Council on this item: • Angel Garcia • Ira Robinson • Wayne Hall 16 Approve Amendment of Section 8.12.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code Concerning the Recovery of Abatement Expenses in Public Nuisance Actions - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Rahn; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Edwards, Naggar, Rahn and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 That the City Council introduce the following Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 15-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 8.12.140 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE RECOVERY OF ABATEMENT EXPENSES IN PUBLIC NUISANCE ACTIONS City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 15-03. Action Minutes 032415 6 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 17 Community Development Department Monthly Report 18 Police Department Monthly Report 19 Public Works Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised there was no reportable action under the Brown Act. ADJOURNMENT At 8:56 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 14, 2015, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes 032415 7 Item No. 3 Approvals City Attorney Mr" Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Jill Dickey, Accounting Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $ 6,900,946.60. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 1, Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/12/15 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 1,078,965.42 03/19/15 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 1,602,205.12 03/26/15 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 3,333,508.90 03/12/15 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 455,667.40 03/26/15 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 430,599.76 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/14/15 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 6,900,946.60 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 170 MEASURE A FUND 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 300 INSURANCE FUND 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 375 INTERN FELLOWSHIP FUND 477 CFD - RORIPAUGH 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 24 HARVESTON 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 27 AVONDALE 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 $ 3,940,234.32 2,200.44 20,030.19 14,384.77 112,760.14 278,482.84 80,104.23 2,041.75 7,403.28 18,935.40 1,114,378.51 146,978.99 607.50 56, 725.03 68,228.68 54,840.90 57.98 1,664.00 3,817.87 1,570.08 1,663.63 444.03 1,758.73 915.78 1,175.23 10,260.07 129.64 446.83 152.81 5,291.67 1,397.74 638.71 595.09 959.80 128.09 4,901.97 2,036.37 6,742.00 25,255.07 224.06 311.76 5,997.60 2,216.35 82.06 470.61 8,783.84 153.00 6,100.00 $ 6,014,679.44 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 526,883.80 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 4,709.68 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 11,420.24 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 204,769.28 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 499.56 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 4,304.79 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 878.23 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,766.53 300 INSURANCE FUND 4,746.66 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 54,235.26 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 13,253.07 340 FACILITIES 21,315.13 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM 322.42 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 170.43 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 114.18 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 135.68 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 24.73 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 274.94 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 49.75 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 70.63 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 466.69 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 4.75 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 21.05 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 14.40 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 311.55 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 66.43 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 38.34 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 33.60 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 77.55 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 6.69 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 288.65 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 154.44 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 418.60 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 708.00 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 16.91 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 18.52 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 24 HARVESTON 398.32 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 128.34 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 5.83 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 27 AVONDALE 18.52 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 587.14 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 7.85 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 32,530.00 TOTAL BY FUND: 886,267.16 $ 6, 900, 946.60 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2653 03/12/2015 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 1,439.52 1,439.52 SUPPORT 2654 03/12/2015 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 4,798.13 4,798.13 303355 PAYMENT 2655 03/12/2015 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 2,640.16 2,640.16 SOLUTION PAYMENT 2656 03/03/2015 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR HEALTH INSURANCE PAYMENT 103,392.16 PREMIUM HEALTH INSURANCE PAYMENT 0.00 103,392.16 2657 03/12/2015 017429 COBRA ADVANTAGE INC. REIMBURSEMENT FSA PAYMENTS 6,255.98 6,255.98 2658 03/16/2015 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAXES PAYMENT 23,339.65 23,339.65 2659 03/16/2015 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT 82,888.86 82,888.86 2660 03/12/2015 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 14,836.61 14,836.61 SOLUTION 169660 03/12/2015 016764 ABM BUILDING SERVICES, LLC facility rehab:crc replace hvac 5,975.55 5,975.55 169661 03/12/2015 013367 ACTIVE MICRO INC Misc. tools & equip.: pw traffic 721.57 IT Help Desk supplies: info tech 137.48 859.05 169662 03/12/2015 017741 AEPPLI, ANN -DENISE Refund:CRC Multipurpose Room & 188.50 188.50 Kitchen 169663 03/12/2015 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT Jan const:pavement rehab:ynez rd 59,439.65 asphalt products:street maint citywide 537.08 asphalt products:street maint citywide 555.95 asphalt products:street maint citywide 443.60 60,976.28 169664 03/12/2015 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES Piano tuning & maint:theater 740.00 740.00 169665 03/12/2015 013015 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW backflow testing:various slope areas 350.00 backflow testing:various slope areas 675.00 backflow testings:various slope areas 425.00 backflow testing:var slope areas 450.00 1,900.00 169666 03/12/2015 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY security alarm batteries:theater 148.78 CORPORATION SIGNAL BATTERIES: PW TRAFFIC 1,067.38 1,216.16 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169667 03/12/2015 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Phlebotomy srvcs:temecula police 1,248.00 (AFN) Phlebotomy srvcs:temecula police 381.42 1,629.42 169668 03/12/2015 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS Saff certification cards:aquatics pgrm 27.00 27.00 169669 03/12/2015 017719 APPLIED BEST PRACTICES Consulting srvcs:finance dept 6,000.00 6,000.00 169670 03/12/2015 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 01/23-02/22 WATER DELIVERY SVC: 361.40 VAR FAC 01/23-02/22 water deliv svc: aquatics 6.47 01/23-02/22 water deliv svc: pbsp 33.42 01/23-02/22 water deliv svc: skate park 6.47 01/23-02/22 WATER DELIV SVC: HARVES 22.63 01/23-02/22 water delivery svcs: 6.47 01/23-02/22 WATER DELIVERY SVC: CI -Pe 32.71 01/23-02/22 WATER DELIVERY SVC: TVE,' 23.00 492.57 169671 03/12/2015 017739 ASSOCIATION OF CA SCHOOL Refund:sec dep:Conference Center A/B 100.00 100.00 169672 03/12/2015 017149 B G P RECREATION, INC. TCSD instructor earnings 1,512.00 TCSD instructor earnings 1,512.00 TCSD instructor earnings 4,082.40 TCSD instructor earnings 154.00 7,260.40 169673 03/12/2015 011666 B P S TACTICAL INC Tactical vests:temecula police 369.36 369.36 169674 03/12/2015 017747 BAGDAD CHASE INC. Refund:sec dep:Conference Center A/B 100.00 100.00 169675 03/12/2015 013482 BAS SECURITY Feb 15 Security: Harveston Lake Park 1,432.00 1,432.00 169676 03/12/2015 014089 BRYANT, TIM Perf: Bluegrass Festival 03/22/15 300.00 300.00 169677 03/12/2015 010817 BURNS, DAVID Performance:Bluegrass Festival 2015 1,500.00 1,500.00 169678 03/12/2015 007794 CAL-PASEO DEL SOL, LLC Refund:Work complete for LD12-024MP 1,800.00 1,800.00 169679 03/12/2015 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY HELIUM TANK REFILLS:SPECIAL 70.16 70.16 EVENTS 169680 03/12/2015 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Mar 15 Copier lease: Civic Center 3,004.54 3,004.54 INC 169681 03/12/2015 004896 CAPLINGER, DENNIS F. Performance:Bluegrass Festival 2015 4,000.00 4,000.00 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169682 03/12/2015 004462 CDW, LLC Dual mounting kit for monitors:TCSD 279.32 279.32 169683 03/12/2015 017751 CHACON, DAVID & LAURA Refund:Work complete for LD07-057GR 995.00 995.00 169684 03/12/2015 014726 CHAPTER 13 STANDING SUPPORT PAYMENT 205.85 205.85 TRUSTEE 169685 03/12/2015 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF Conf: Flores & Ramirez: 04/04/15 100.00 100.00 169686 03/12/2015 017392 CLS CONSTRUCTION p/e 02/15 citywide concrete repairs: cip 112,760.14 112,760.14 169687 03/12/2015 017429 COBRA ADVANTAGE INC. Feb Flex Processing Fees 175.50 175.50 169688 03/12/2015 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES 24.00 24.00 CHARITIES PAYMENT 169689 03/12/2015 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL misc electrical supplies: civic center 66.69 DIST. misc electrical supplies: civic center 175.50 242.19 169690 03/12/2015 014521 COSTAR GROUP Mar 15 web subscription:Eco Dev 397.13 397.13 INFORMATION, INC 169691 03/12/2015 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 Misc pgrm supplies:human services 23.30 Misc supplies:theater hospitality 87.80 111.10 169692 03/12/2015 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC Traffic data collection: pw traffic 1,000.00 1,000.00 169693 03/12/2015 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & plumbing srvcs: tcc / pantry 300.00 300.00 HVAC INC 169694 03/12/2015 000209 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES misc small tool parts:pw street maint 17.27 17.27 169695 03/12/2015 017756 DAVIDSON COMMUNITIES, INC. Refund:Permit # LD04-222GR expired 995.00 995.00 169696 03/12/2015 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Mar portable restroom rentals:GOHS 52.80 52.80 SRVCS 169697 03/12/2015 012581 DMC BUILDING COMPANY, INC. Refund:Work complete for LD11-010MP 1.00 1.00 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 169698 03/12/2015 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & Fuel for City vehicles: tcsd & code enf 101.69 LUBRICANTS Fuel for City vehicles: tcsd 277.88 Fuel for City vehicles: tcsd & cofe enf 188.74 Fuel for City vehicles: police dept 72.81 Fuel for City vehicles: pw traffic div 254.50 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 357.14 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 191.19 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 444.37 Fuel for City vehicles: bldg 129.99 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 86.17 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 63.40 Fuel for City vehicles: bldg 217.36 Fuel for City vehicles: pw parks 572.80 2,958.04 169699 03/12/2015 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Feb water meter:32131 S Loop rd bldg 93.40 DIST Feb water meter:32131 S Loop rd Idsc 12.31 Feb water meter:32131 S Loop rd dcda 43.61 149.32 169700 03/12/2015 004068 ECALDRE MANALILI-DE VILLA, TCSD Instructor Earnings 192.94 AILEEN TCSD Instructor Earnings 173.25 TCSD Instructor Earnings 157.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 267.75 TCSD Instructor Earnings 157.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 173.25 TCSD Instructor Earnings 236.25 TCSD Instructor Earnings 157.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 173.25 TCSD Instructor Earnings 267.75 TCSD Instructor Earnings 157.50 2,114.44 169701 03/12/2015 017748 ELLIOTT, STEPHANIE Refund:sec dep:CRC Multipurpose 200.00 200.00 169702 03/12/2015 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY Mar 15 state legis cnsltng svcs: cm 3,500.00 3,500.00 LLC 169703 03/12/2015 011203 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING Feb 15 janitorial svcs:var park restroom 5,265.00 5,265.00 169705 03/12/2015 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. Feb 15 Idscp maint srvcs:parks 51,365.88 Feb 15 landscape maint: parks 48,525.10 Feb 15 Idscp maint srvcs:medians 18,094.70 Feb 15 Idscp maint srvcs: var facilities 9,993.13 Feb 15 maint svcs: north slopes 21,610.97 Feb 15 maint svcs: south slopes 34,844.87 184,434.65 169706 03/12/2015 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 850.62 850.62 Page4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169707 03/12/2015 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 2/18-2/19 Express mail svcs:fire & clerk 80.91 80.91 169708 03/12/2015 000206 FEDEX KINKOS INC Stationery paper supplies: central svcs 78.81 78.81 169709 03/12/2015 014819 FLATIRON WEST, INC. PPE 02/20 CONST:FRENCH VALLEY 7,549.20 7,549.20 PKWY PROJ 169710 03/12/2015 004074 FRANCHISE MGMT SERVICES MISC. SUPPLIES:MPSC 183.78 183.78 INC 169711 03/12/2015 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 350.00 350.00 169712 03/12/2015 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 150.00 150.00 169713 03/12/2015 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS SOUND/LIGHTING & MISC 347.72 347.72 SUPPLIES:THEATER 169714 03/12/2015 010326 G E MOBILE WATER, INC WATER FILTRATION SUPPLIES:STN 73 63.72 63.72 169715 03/12/2015 007279 GAIL MATERIALS INC Idscp material: rrsp ballfields 4,738.51 4,738.51 169716 03/12/2015 001937 GALLS INC Misc supplies:Police volunteers 32.38 Misc supplies:Police volunteers 16.19 48.57 169717 03/12/2015 017745 GARCIA, MARYCELA Refund:sec dep:TCC Multipurpose Room 200.00 200.00 169718 03/12/2015 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS FEB 15 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:BLDG 127.97 INC AND SAF FEB 15 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANC 79.67 Feb 15 misc offce supplies: city clerk 221.65 Feb 15 misc ofc supplies: central svcs 59.31 Feb 15 misc office supplies - planning 120.04 608.64 169719 03/12/2015 017750 GREENBEE Refund:Work complete for LD13-010GR 3,000.00 3,000.00 169720 03/12/2015 008081 HALL & FOREMAN INC 12/28-01/31 design srvcs: library 9,821.64 Jan 15 Cnsltnt srvcs:citywide pave rehab 411.75 10,233.39 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169721 03/12/2015 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 169722 03/12/2015 013749 HELIXSTORM INC. 169723 03/12/2015 017433 HOMAN & STONE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 169724 03/12/2015 011049 HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY 169725 03/12/2015 017226 IMSA CERTIFICATION 169726 03/12/2015 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT Description Amount Paid Check Total Feb 15 misc hardware supplies:theater 128.90 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: st. maint 1,096.66 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: civic ctr 11.86 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: crc 237.83 Feb 15 aquatics maint supplies:var pools 116.58 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies:harveston 16.73 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies:old town 37.79 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: 27.43 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies:tv museum 5.39 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies:mpsc 92.74 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: library 111.21 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: fire 155.29 Feb 15 supplies:Var. csd special events 775.57 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: tcc 91.66 Feb 15 misc supplies: pw traffic 113.69 Feb 15 misc hardware supplies: ott 1,983.11 5,002.44 FIREWALL FILTERING:INFO 3,558.13 3,558.13 TECHNOLOGY 12/10-01/23 legal services provided 607.50 607.50 Refund:sec dep:Conference Center A/B 100.00 100.00 Class:traffic signal tech level III: 285.00 285.00 02/23 doc shred svcs: CRC 16.85 02/23 doc shred svcs: Library 15.75 02/23 doc shred svcs: police dept 15.75 02/23 doc shred svcs: Civic Center 63.00 111.35 169727 03/12/2015 017400 IVL CONTRACTORS, INC. p/e 01/31 Install Pauba Rd. sidewalks 63,342.90 63,342.90 169728 03/12/2015 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC JACOB'S HOUSE CHARITY PAYMENT 40.00 40.00 169729 03/12/2015 015358 KELLY PAPER COMPANY, INC. paper supplies:central services 1,598.04 1,598.04 169730 03/12/2015 017118 KRACH, BREE B. Trophies:FIT Challenge winners 369.36 369.36 169731 03/12/2015 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC POOL EQUIP/REPLACEMENT 135.83 135.83 PARTS:AQUATICS 169732 03/12/2015 004087 LOWES INC Fire Station supplies - Sta 84 489.40 Fire Station supplies - Sta 84 574.34 1,063.74 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169733 03/12/2015 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSN Feb 15 Officiating Svcs:Sports programs 851.00 851.00 169734 03/12/2015 011920 MASTER CONCEPTS LLC TCSD Instructor Earnings 808.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 514.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 367.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 220.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 882.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 1,102.50 3,895.50 169735 03/12/2015 017743 MCNAIR, DON Refund:Temecula Rod Run Car Entry 15.00 15.00 169736 03/12/2015 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS INC. Consulting srvcs:CSD special events 90.24 Consulting srvcs:CSD special events 65.65 Consulting srvcs:CSD special events 3,500.00 3,655.89 169737 03/12/2015 015259 MERCURY DISPOSAL Household Battery recycling program. 541.12 541.12 SYSTEMS, INC. 169738 03/12/2015 016297 MID -AMERICA ARTS ALLIANCE Exhibit rental:Grand Ole Opry 1,400.00 1,400.00 169739 03/12/2015 010908 MR APPLIANCE OF kitchen appliance repair:conf center 135.50 135.50 WINCHESTER 169740 03/12/2015 014564 NATIONAL BUSINESS FY 14/15 membership dues:tve2 68778 525.00 525.00 INCUBATION 169741 03/12/2015 008820 NEIGHBORS NEWSPAPER Advertising:Bluegrass Festival 2015 250.00 250.00 169742 03/12/2015 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 71.25 DIV MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 38.70 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW TRAFFIC 35.04 144.99 169743 03/12/2015 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEH REPAIR & MAINT:PW LAND DEV 628.25 VEH REPAIR & MAINT:PW LAND DEV 755.50 1,383.75 169744 03/12/2015 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE city vehicle repairs & maint:PW CIP 211.20 VEH REPAIR & MAINT:PW TRAFFIC 268.65 veh repairs & maint: pw street maint 435.00 veh maint repairs:parks/facilities divs 41.75 956.60 169745 03/12/2015 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT:B&S 49.95 49.95 DEPT 169746 03/12/2015 015923 PCMG MERAKI'S NEEDED FOR FRONT 2,194.54 2,194.54 STREET Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169747 03/12/2015 003663 PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO TRIBAL MONITORING:PAUBA RD 17,589.90 SIDEWALKS credit:Tribal monitoring:pauba rd -2,589.90 15,000.00 169748 03/12/2015 010590 PETRICKA, TAMMY EE computer loan program 900.00 900.00 169749 03/12/2015 016529 PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY SUPPORT PAYMENT 66.92 66.92 INC 169750 03/12/2015 011861 PLUMBMASTER INC. DRINKING FOUNTAIN PARTS:VAR 656.10 656.10 PARKS 169751 03/12/2015 017675 PODS ENTERPRISES, INC. PODS rental:Fire Stn 73 79.92 PODS RENTAL:FIRE STN 73 79.92 PODS rental:Fire Stn 73 169.56 PODS rental:Fire Stn 73 10.00 PODS rental:Fire Stn 73 79.92 PODS rental:Fire Stn 73 169.56 PODS rental:Fire Stn 73 169.56 758.44 169752 03/12/2015 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS INC pool chemicals & supplies:crc pool 499.50 pool chemicals & supplies:crc pool 318.61 pool chemicals & supplies:crc pool 86.40 904.51 169753 03/12/2015 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 320.90 320.90 INC 169754 03/12/2015 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE 3/4/15-4/6/16 subscr:City Mgr ofc 286.26 286.26 COMPANY INC 169755 03/12/2015 017431 PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE PAYMENT 8,023.58 8,023.58 CO 169756 03/12/2015 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL FEB UNIFORM/FLR MTS/TWL 1,142.25 1,142.25 SUPPLY RENTAL:CITY FAC 169757 03/12/2015 017758 RANCHO VIEW Refund:Work complete for LD07-121 GR 995.00 995.00 PROFESSIONAL 169758 03/12/2015 000271 RBF CONSULTING Traffic study:river springs charter 265.00 JAN ENG SVCS:I-15/SR-79S INTERCHANi 1,046.32 1,311.32 169759 03/12/2015 017753 REICHELL, RICHARD & SUSAN Refund:Work complete for LD12-085GR 2,000.00 2,000.00 169760 03/12/2015 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & record notary oath & bond: SP 61.00 61.00 RECORDER Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169761 03/12/2015 000355 RIVERSIDE CO REGISTRAR OF election svcs:co registrar:Nov 2014 90,835.90 90,835.90 VOTE 169762 03/12/2015 017746 RODRIGUEZ, VINSON Refund:sec dep:Harveston Center MPR 200.00 200.00 169763 03/12/2015 017742 RUHL, STEVE Refund:sec dep:Harveston Center MPR 150.00 150.00 169764 03/12/2015 015646 SALTY SUITES Performance:Bluegrass Festival 3/22 750.00 750.00 169765 03/12/2015 017699 SARNOWSKI, SHAWNA, PHOTOGRAPHY:THEATER PHOTOS 500.00 500.00 M.PRESTON 169766 03/12/2015 013376 SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES FIRE ALARM MAINT SVC:CIV CTR & 139.00 INC GARAGE FIRE ALARM MAINT SVC:OT PRKG GARP 143.30 FIRE ALARM MAINT SVC:OT PRKG GARP 139.00 install access control system:faclity 3,861.21 4,282.51 169767 03/12/2015 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - SUPPORT PAYMENT 213.89 213.89 CENTRAL 169768 03/12/2015 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Settlement:Jazz at the Merc 3/5 715.00 715.00 169769 03/12/2015 004460 SILVERADO BLUEGRASS BAND Performance:Bluegrass Festival 3/21-22 2,000.00 2,000.00 Page:9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169771 03/12/2015 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Description Amount Paid Check Total Feb 2-29-224-0173:32364 Overland Trl 1,549.99 Feb 2-31-404-6020:28771 OT front st 1,274.13 Feb 2-34-333-3589:41702 Main St 28.67 Feb 2-31-031-2616:27991 Diaz Rd 28.35 Feb 2-29-807-1226:28077 Diaz Rd 27.91 Feb 2-29-807-1093:28079 Diaz Rd 27.32 Feb 2-29-657-2787:41638 Winchester 27.49 Feb 2-31-536-3226:28690 Mercedes St 1,396.26 Feb 2-29-953-8082:31523 Wolf vly rd 29.18 Feb 2-29-953-8249:46497 Wolf creek dr 28.01 Feb 2-35-707-0010:33451 S Hwy -79 56.36 Feb 2-31-282-0665:27407 Diaz Rd 28.35 Feb 2-29-657-2332:45538 Redwood Rd 26.10 Feb 2-29-953-8447:31738 Wolf vly rd 25.96 Feb 2-30-220-8749:45850 N Wolf crk dr 334.40 Feb 2-00-397-5042:43200 Bus park dr #1 3,062.46 Feb 2-31-912-7494:28690 Mercedes St 1,411.22 Feb 2-29-933-3831:43230 Bus park dr 1,576.08 Feb 2-32-903-8293:41000 Main St 13,661.48 Feb 2-35-664-9053:29119 Margarita Rd 162.23 Feb 2-35-403-6337:41375 McCabe Ct 807.56 Feb 2-25-393-4681:41951 Moraga Rd 513.92 Feb 2-19-171-8568:28300 Mercedes St 398.41 Feb 2-18-937-3152:28314 Mercedes St 374.72 Feb 2-14-204-1615:30027 Front st rdio 39.46 Feb 2-02-351-4946:41845 6th St 790.58 Feb 2-29-295-3510:32211 Wolf vly rd 750.04 Feb 2-30-520-4414:32781 Tem pkwy LS3 1,173.25 Feb 2-37-303-0485:27498 Enterprise cir 154.03 Feb 2-36-641-3912:27498 Enterprise cir 38.29 Feb 2-36-641-3839:27498 Enterprise cir 31.11 Feb 2-35-074-2847:26902 Jefferson 32.07 Feb 2-28-904-7706:32329 Overland Trl 161.88 Feb 2-21-981-4720:30153 Tem pkwy tpp 25.68 Feb 2-00-397-5067:TCSD svc lev C 2,395.73 Feb 2-31-536-3481:41902 Main St 226.61 Feb 2-29-223-8607:42035 2nd St PED 782.07 Feb 2-31-536-3655:41904 Main St 1,018.16 34,475.52 Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169772 03/12/2015 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Description Feb 091-085-1632-0:41951 Moraga Rd Feb 021-725-0775-4:41845 6th St Feb 028-025-1468-3:41375 McCabe Ct Feb 026-671-2909-8:42051 Main St Feb 101-525-0950-0:28816 Pujol St Feb 196-025-0344-3:42081 Main St Feb 129-535-4236-7:41000 Main St Feb 133-040-7373-0:43210 Bus park dr Feb 181-383-8881-6:28314 Mercedes Feb 055-461-2483-4:40135 Village Rd Feb 125-244-2108-3:30600 Pauba Rd Feb 117-188-6393-6:32131 S Loop Rd Feb 101-525-1560-6:27415 Enterprise cir Feb 095-167-7907-2:30650 Pauba Rd Amount Paid Check Total 14.79 139.97 35.99 162.85 41.77 85.15 1,466.46 20.59 88.95 91.19 251.80 174.73 182.13 244.68 3,001.05 169773 03/12/2015 017744 SOPER, GARY Refund:Temecula Rod Run Car Entry 15.00 15.00 169774 03/12/2015 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY I C E elec gen diese1:41000 Main St 331.81 FY14-15 flat fee last fiscal yr:41000 119.76 451.57 169775 03/12/2015 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST MISC PEST CONTROL SVCS:VAR 70.00 CONTROL INC PARKS pest control svcs:Fire Stn 92 42.00 pest control svcs:32364 Overland Trl 48.00 MISC PEST CONTROL SVCS:VAR PARKS 49.00 Feb pest control svcs:city facilities 748.00 957.00 169776 03/12/2015 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MAR GEN USAGE:0141,0839,2593,9306 533.45 533.45 169777 03/12/2015 017738 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Refund:sec dep:Conference Center 100.00 100.00 ASSOC 169781 03/12/2015 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT 8,215.27 8,215.27 COMPANY 169782 03/12/2015 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE 880.10 880.10 COMPANY PAYMENT Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169783 03/12/2015 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE Description Amount Paid Check Total Misc office supplies: 59.67 misc office supplies:CRC 42.47 misc office supplies:crc 1.74 credit:misc office supplies:crc -1.74 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MANAGER 206.70 CREDIT:MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CM -30.68 misc office supplies:TCSD Admin 74.52 misc office supplies:TCSD Admin 39.03 misc office supplies:TCSD Admin 55.57 misc office supplies:MPSC 146.77 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HISTORY MUSE 84.55 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HISTORY MUSE 6.03 misc office supplies:TPL 327.28 misc office supplies:TCSD Admin 43.20 misc office supplies:children's museum 105.05 misc office supplies:human services 41.40 misc office supplies:TPL 17.04 misc office supplies:PD mall storefront 120.83 misc office supplies:PD mall storefront 6.36 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PD OLD TOWN' 84.76 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PD OLD TOWN' 9.05 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PD OLD TOWN' 31.02 1,470.62 169784 03/12/2015 017757 TANAMERA/RORIPAUGH II, LLC Refund:Permit # LD04-062GR expired 995.00 995.00 169785 03/12/2015 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD MISC SUPPLIES:CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 306.10 SRVCS 169786 03/12/2015 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 169787 03/12/2015 010679 TEMECULAAUTO REPAIR/RADIATOR 169788 03/12/2015 017760 TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 169789 03/12/2015 017749 TEMECULA VALLEY COUNCIL PTA MISC SUPPLIES:HISTORY MUSEUM 223.94 MISC SUPPLIES:THEATER 44.45 MISC SUPPLIES:HISTORY MUSEUM 21.31 misc supplies:crc 20.83 616.63 UNION DUES PAYMENT 4,913.00 4,913.00 vehicle maintenance: Prevention 50.01 50.01 Refund:Work complete for LD07-109GR 995.00 995.00 Refund:sec dep:Conference Center A/B 100.00 100.00 169790 03/12/2015 009194 TEMECULA VALLEY NEWS Advertising: Temecula Presents 672.15 672.15 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169791 03/12/2015 016311 TIERCE, NICHOLAS Video services:TVM 270.00 Graphic design srvcs: Theater 2,115.00 2,385.00 169792 03/12/2015 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Mar high speed internet:Harveston Ctr 319.00 MAR HIGH SPEED INTERNET:LIBRARY 585.51 904.51 169793 03/12/2015 017740 TOBIN, SEAN Refund:Temecula Rod Run Car Entry 35.00 35.00 169794 03/12/2015 017752 TOM JONES CALIFORNIA, INC. Refund:Work complete for LD11-028GR 22,680.00 22,680.00 169795 03/12/2015 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL misc small equip parts:pw street maint 7.73 7.73 169797 03/12/2015 017430 TRANSAMERICA LIFE TRANSAMERICA ACCIDENT ADVANTAG 2,553.40 2,553.40 INSURANCE CO PAYMENT 169798 03/12/2015 017754 UHS OF DELAWARE INC. Refund:Work complete for LD10-019GR 50,000.00 50,000.00 169799 03/12/2015 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE underground utility locator: pw traffic 144.00 144.00 ALERT 169800 03/12/2015 002110 UNITED RENTALS NORTH misc equip rentals: pw street maint 34.43 34.43 AMERICA 169801 03/12/2015 000325 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY CHARITIES PAYMENT 5.00 5.00 169802 03/12/2015 012549 UPODIUM vehicle maint supplies:Fire Stn 12 202.58 202.58 169803 03/12/2015 017579 US HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL PRE-EMPLOYMENT DRUG 169.00 169.00 GROUP SCREENINGS:HR 169804 03/12/2015 004789 VERIZON Feb Internet svcs:Theater 145.98 145.98 169805 03/12/2015 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/16-2/15 BROADBAND 1,945.61 1,945.61 USAGE:CITYWIDE 169806 03/12/2015 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC MISC CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES:LIBRARY, 891.76 891.76 CIVIC C 169807 03/12/2015 003730 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING SVCS:ROW 1,092.00 1,092.00 TREES 169808 03/12/2015 000339 WEST PUBLISHING CORP CA Penal Code 2015 Pamphlet 207.90 207.90 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169809 03/12/2015 017755 WESTSIDE BUSINESS CENTER, LLC 169810 03/12/2015 011253 WILSON CREEK WINER &VINEYARDS 169811 03/12/2015 017759 WOODSIDE HOMES OF SO. 169812 03/12/2015 017734 ZIGLAR, INC. 1000385 03/10/2015 017727 JOHNSON, MARY 1000386 03/10/2015 017727 JOHNSON, MARY 1000387 03/10/2015 017729 TANGPHASEUTH, YVONNE 1000388 03/10/2015 017728 TAYLOR, CHON Description Refund:Work complete for LD98-031 MP Leadership Workshop Refund:Work complete for LD12-007GR speaker fees:Idrshp wkshp 3/12 Refund:Fun with Learning Centers Refund:Bright Start for Kids (Little Refund:Bright Start for Kids Refund:7 Habits of Happy & Smart Kids! Amount Paid Check Total 1,500.00 1,500.00 4,412.76 4,412.76 17,000.00 17,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 30.00 30.00 168.00 168.00 359.00 359.00 70.00 70.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,078,965.42 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 03/12/2015 9:49:42AM CITY OF TEMECULA 159 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,078,965.42 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2661 03/17/2015 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 40,590.82 40,590.82 RETIREMENT) 169813 03/19/2015 017321 A.M. AIR FREIGHT, INC. Exhibit shipping:TVM 880.00 880.00 169814 03/19/2015 016764 ABM BUILDING SERVICES, LLC hvac repair srvcs:history museum 208.52 208.52 169815 03/19/2015 013367 ACTIVE MICRO INC Misc. tools & equip.: pw traffic 1,020.27 1,020.27 169816 03/19/2015 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL Police K-9 monthly training 283.34 283.34 INC 169817 03/19/2015 014695 ALL AMERICAN Equip repair & maint:police bicycles 118.12 118.12 MOTORSPORTS, INC 169818 03/19/2015 013015 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW backflow tests: various facilities 300.00 backflow tests:wolfcrk:gallery slopes 425.00 backflow tests: var fire stations 250.00 975.00 169819 03/19/2015 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Phlebotomy srvcs:temecula police 296.66 (AFN) Phlebotomy srvcs:temecula police 635.70 Phlebotomy srvcs:temecula police 359.04 1,291.40 169820 03/19/2015 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS Saff certification cards:aquatics pgrm 27.00 27.00 169821 03/19/2015 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE Jan 15 Animal control srvcs:temecula 10,000.00 10,000.00 VALLEYS 169822 03/19/2015 000101 APPLE ONE INC Temp help w/e 02/21: info sys/plan/bldg 7,675.64 7,675.64 169823 03/19/2015 010903 BARNETT, BEA Conference: CPRS2015 Conf & Awards 330.12 330.12 169824 03/19/2015 012583 BLANCA Y PRICE Oct Ldscp plan check/inspection:planning 12,890.00 12,890.00 169825 03/19/2015 015834 BOYER, WAYNE E. Uniforms: PD Motors 415.50 415.50 169826 03/19/2015 000128 BROWN & BROWN INSURANCE policy 105758224 02/26/14-07/01/15 1,425.00 policy B2A31M000230700 2/26-7/1/15 31,764.96 policy BPP5780936 02/26/14-07/01/15 51,618.58 84,808.54 169827 03/19/2015 004248 CALIF DEPT OF Feb 15 doj fingerprinting 3,862.00 3,862.00 JUSTICE-ACCTING Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169828 03/19/2015 014666 CALIFORNIA AVOCADO Refund:Sec Dep:Conference CenterA/B 150.00 150.00 169829 03/19/2015 004462 CDW, LLC MISC SUPPLIES:INFO TECH- 388.80 388.80 169830 03/19/2015 009640 CERTIFION CORPORATION FEB ONLINE DATABASE 150.00 150.00 SUBSCRIPTION:POLICE 169831 03/19/2015 012930 CHARITY FOR CHARITY Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 150.00 150.00 169832 03/19/2015 000137 CHEVRON AND TEXACO City vehicles fuel: police dept 1,507.33 1,507.33 169833 03/19/2015 005417 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY misc first-aid supplies: var facilities 200.00 200.00 169834 03/19/2015 013716 COAST TO COAST LASER Crime Prevention Plaque - Quality Inn 59.40 59.40 169835 03/19/2015 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS Apr -Jun fire & security monitoring:City 6,060.00 6,060.00 169836 03/19/2015 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL misc electrical supplies: old town 1,378.46 DIST. misc electrical supplies: town sixth 156.60 1,535.06 169837 03/19/2015 011922 CORELOGIC, INC. FEB DATABASE SUBSCR: CODE ENF 22.00 22.00 169838 03/19/2015 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD Instructor Earnings 196.00 196.00 169839 03/19/2015 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:INFO TECH 56.53 MISC SUPPLIES:TEAM PACE- 224.18 280.71 169840 03/19/2015 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 Misc. supplies: rod run supplies 668.01 Misc. supplies: rod run supplies 6.03 Misc. supplies:var csd special events 217.91 891.95 169841 03/19/2015 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC Traffic data collection: pw traffic 2,000.00 2,000.00 169842 03/19/2015 016724 CRAFT, CHARLENE reimb: EOQ luncheon march 2015 234.02 234.02 169843 03/19/2015 014454 CRAMER, MATTHEW REIMB:CA NARCOTIC CANINE ASSOC 192.90 192.90 1/28 169844 03/19/2015 014713 DAN CRARY THUNDERATION, Performance:Bluegrass Festival 2015 1,250.00 1,250.00 INC. Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169845 03/19/2015 017782 DERNBACH, HEIDI Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 50.00 50.00 169846 03/19/2015 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Portable restrooms:42801 Main St 1,119.22 1,119.22 SRVCS 169847 03/19/2015 016756 DOCTOR'S NUTRITIONAL Police K-9 food FY14/15 82.80 82.80 PRODUCTS 169848 03/19/2015 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. landscape maint srvcs:var parks 283.76 landscape maint srvcs:var parks 241.36 landscape maint srvcs:var parks 193.49 install irrig regulator:saddlewood slope 1,148.59 Idscp repairs:accident:tem pkwy med 950.00 irrigigation syst upgrades: Nakayama 1,575.00 landscape maint srvcs:var parks 263.39 irrig. system upgrades: Nakayama Park 675.00 install plant material: Seraphina slope 2,836.00 landscape maint srvcs:var parks 145.32 8,311.91 169849 03/19/2015 017778 FARRA, JEANINE Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 150.00 150.00 169850 03/19/2015 017784 FASANO, CLARE Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 200.00 200.00 169851 03/19/2015 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 2/20 & 2/24 Express mail svcs 27.45 27.45 169852 03/19/2015 014865 FEIZE UHLER, KIMBERLY Uniforms for Building and Safety 403.82 403.82 169853 03/19/2015 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 017781 BRICK LANE LLC JC wooden American flag: city council 42.12 014529 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. JC Temecula Has Heart stakeholder mtg 37.00 79.12 169854 03/19/2015 011145 FOSTER, JILL CHRISTINE TCSD instructor earnings 1,837.50 TCSD instructor earnings 2,136.05 TCSD instructor earnings 3,266.90 7,240.45 169855 03/19/2015 001937 GALLS INC Misc supplies:Police volunteers 5.39 Misc supplies:Police volunteers 28.07 Misc supplies:Police volunteers 12.96 46.42 169856 03/19/2015 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Feb 15 misc offce supplies:eco dev 40.93 40.93 INC Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169857 03/19/2015 004890 GOLDEN STATE FIRE PROTECTION Description Amount Paid Check Total 5 -yr cert inspect for auto. fire 650.00 5 -yr cert inspect for auto. fire 5 -yr cert inspect for auto. fire fire alarm sprinkler insp:var facilities replace fire sprinkler valve:ot garage 750.00 650.00 700.00 1,362.00 4,112.00 169858 03/19/2015 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC Sttlmnt: Copeland celebration 3/14 2,008.88 2,008.88 SOCIETY 169859 03/19/2015 008647 GOODING, EDWIN, D. Perf:Bluegrass Festival 3/21 & 3/22 2,000.00 2,000.00 169860 03/19/2015 008081 HALL & FOREMAN INC 12/28-1/31/15 eng srvc:o.t. storm drain 305.00 305.00 169861 03/19/2015 017777 HARRIS, ARTHEA Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 150.00 150.00 169862 03/19/2015 013749 HELIXSTORM INC. IT Critical Infrastructure Support 1,012.50 1,012.50 169863 03/19/2015 017433 HOMAN & STONE ATTORNEYS 02/02/15 legal services provided 688.50 688.50 AT LAW 169864 03/19/2015 016298 HORN CLINIC, THE Settlement:Speakeasy..Merc 03/14/15 659.40 659.40 169865 03/19/2015 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY pressure washer part:pw Idscp maint 192.41 192.41 169866 03/19/2015 016564 IMPACT TELECOM FEB 800 SERVICES:CIVIC CENTER 60.73 60.73 169867 03/19/2015 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT Shred srvcs:temecula police 15.75 15.75 169868 03/19/2015 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT Purchase & Install of 14 Canon copiers 47,001.92 47,001.92 SOLUTIONS 169869 03/19/2015 013286 INTRADO, INC. MAR ENTERPRISE 911 SVC: IT 255.00 255.00 169870 03/19/2015 017785 JONES, GHAZALA Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 150.00 150.00 169871 03/19/2015 015358 KELLY PAPER COMPANY, INC. paper supplies:central services 612.19 612.19 169872 03/19/2015 001091 KEYSER MARSTON Feb 15 consult svcs: land use eco study 420.00 ASSOCIATES INC JAN 15 REAL ESTATE CNSLT:AFFRDBLE FEB 15 REAL ESTATE CNSLT:AFFRDBLE 4,525.63 3,608.30 8,553.93 Page4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169873 03/19/2015 012945 LABELLE- MARVIN INC Pavement rehab: pw cip 10,100.00 10,100.00 169874 03/19/2015 014287 LENNAR WESTERN REGION Refund:Work completed for LD13-067GR 50,000.00 50,000.00 169875 03/19/2015 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS MISC. SIGNS: PW TRAFFIC 1,052.95 1,052.95 169876 03/19/2015 017780 MARTINEZ, BARBARA Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 100.00 100.00 169877 03/19/2015 017776 MCFADDEN, ANGELA Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 150.00 150.00 169878 03/19/2015 015959 MEHEULA MUSIC Perf: Temecula Presents 3/22/15 1,000.00 1,000.00 169879 03/19/2015 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC AV collections:TPL 470.63 470.63 169880 03/19/2015 016445 MKB PRINTING & Business Cards -City Council J 96.38 PROMOTIONAL INC Comerchero Misc printing services:planning 153.28 249.66 169881 03/19/2015 013965 MONOPRICE, INC. Cables & misc items:IT Help Desk 94.17 94.17 169882 03/19/2015 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY, J. TCSD instructor earnings 168.00 168.00 169883 03/19/2015 003963 MR TINT GLASS TINTING Window tinting: vehicle tint replacement 335.00 335.00 169884 03/19/2015 017590 MYRIAD ARTISTS LLC Performance:Bluegrass Festival 2015 3,400.00 3,400.00 169885 03/19/2015 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS Auto parts & misc supplies: Sta 92 281.53 281.53 169886 03/19/2015 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 49.30 49.30 DIV 169887 03/19/2015 017779 PALERMO, LISA Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 100.00 100.00 169888 03/19/2015 000249 PETTY CASH petty cash reimbursement 735.37 735.37 169889 03/19/2015 017675 PODS ENTERPRISES, INC. PODS RENTAL:FIRE STN 73 169.56 PODS RENTAL:FIRE STN 73 10.00 PODS RENTAL:FIRE STN 73 169.56 PODS RENTAL:FIRE STN 73 169.56 518.68 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169890 03/19/2015 002579 POTAMUS PRESS 2015 ROD RUN PROGRAMS 7,560.00 7,560.00 169891 03/19/2015 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE 6 MOS. SUBSCR:SUPPORT SERV 129.99 129.99 COMPANY INC 169892 03/19/2015 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & Jan 15 legal services 51,734.02 51,734.02 GERSHON 169893 03/19/2015 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE FPARC-TM, INV# 232058, 14-15, Q2 1,081,754.59 1,081,754.59 DEPARTMENT 169894 03/19/2015 017355 RIVERSIDE CO R. M. EMS emerg dept conference:Fire 400.00 400.00 C.AUXILIARY 169895 03/19/2015 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 12/11/14-1/18/15 YOUTH COURT SVCS 395.14 395.14 DEPT 169896 03/19/2015 014347 ROBERTS, PATRICIA G. TCSD Instructor Earnings 437.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 525.00 962.50 169897 03/19/2015 014591 ROLDAN COMPANIES, INC. VIDEO TAPING SVC:EVERY 15 MIN 1,750.00 1,750.00 PGRM 4/8-9 169898 03/19/2015 016778 ROW TRAFFIC SAFETY, INC. misc traffic control supplies:st maint 1,830.60 misc traffic control supplies:st maint 313.20 2,143.80 169899 03/19/2015 009196 SACRAMENTO THEATRICAL SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES:THEATER 1,499.44 1,499.44 LIGHTING 169900 03/19/2015 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Settlement:Jazz at the Merc 3/12 1,090.00 1,090.00 169901 03/19/2015 011548 SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER video conference:Surviving the Holocaust 250.00 250.00 INC 169902 03/19/2015 014818 SKYFIT TECH, INC. GYM EQUIP MAINT SVCS:CIVIC 195.00 195.00 CENTER Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169903 03/19/2015 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Feb 2-29-479-2981:31454 Tem pkwy TC1 104.66 Feb 2-29-974-7899:26953 Ynez Rd LS3 145.66 Feb 2-31-031-2590:28301 Rancho Cal 24.51 Feb 2-05-791-8807:31587 Tem pkwy LS3 9,454.21 Jan -Feb 2-36-122-7820:31777 Deportola 51.27 Feb 2-30-066-2889:30051 Rancho vista 26.10 Feb 2-31-936-3511:46488 Pechanga 55.82 Feb 2-27-805-3194:42051 Main St 3,253.93 Feb 2-02-351-5281:30875 Rancho vista 4,234.30 Feb 2-20-798-3248:42081 Main St 1,013.36 Feb 2-10-331-2153:28816 Pujol St 551.48 Feb 2-28-629-0507:30600 Pauba Rd 6,015.27 Feb 2-02-502-8077:43210 Bus park dr 374.81 Feb 2-29-458-7548:32000 Rancho Cal 311.60 Feb 2-36-531-7916:44205 Main St 215.32 Feb 2-35-421-1260:41955 4th St LS3 21.95 Feb 2-29-657-2563:42902 Butterfield Stg 222.86 Feb 2-25-350-5119:45602 Redhawk pkwy 27.13 26,104.24 169904 03/19/2015 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control srvcs: town square 94.00 94.00 CONTROL INC 169905 03/19/2015 005786 SPRINT Jan 26 - Feb 25 cellular usage/equip 5,198.46 5,198.46 169906 03/19/2015 017783 ST. NICHOLAS GREEK Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 150.00 150.00 ORTHODOX 169907 03/19/2015 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC REFRESHMENTS:HUMAN SERVICES 92.13 92.13 PRGM 169908 03/19/2015 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS misc office supplies:PD mall storefront 76.15 76.15 ADVANTAGE 169909 03/19/2015 002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS audio srvcs:equip rental:rod run 2015 1,365.00 1,365.00 169910 03/19/2015 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS FEB TRANSCRIPTION SVCS:TEM 1,801.38 1,801.38 TRANSCRIPTION POLICE 169911 03/19/2015 014541 STEVE'S TOWING, INC TOWING SVCS:TEM POLICE 215.00 215.00 #TE150100220 169912 03/19/2015 012789 STUART, JENNIFER SARAH TCSD Instructor Earnings 3,640.00 3,640.00 169913 03/19/2015 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD MISC SUPPLIES:CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 86.73 SRVCS MISC SUPPLIES:CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 33.64 120.37 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169914 03/19/2015 010679 TEMECULA AUTO vehicle maintenance: Medics 800.00 800.00 REPAIR/RADIATOR 169915 03/19/2015 017131 TEMECULA HILLS CHRISTIAN Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 150.00 150.00 169916 03/19/2015 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith srvcs:crc 86.00 CENTR dupl. keys:Tem police 8.64 94.64 169917 03/19/2015 014056 TEMECULA YOUTH BASEBALL, Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 100.00 100.00 GENERAL FUND 169918 03/19/2015 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Mar high speed internet:Coax 28.16 28.16 169919 03/19/2015 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL misc small equip parts:pw street maint 89.80 89.80 169920 03/19/2015 009709 U H S OF RANCHO SPRINGS, SART EXAMS:POLICE 2/1, 23 1,800.00 1,800.00 INC 169921 03/19/2015 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE BUS LIC:2ND RENEWAL NOTICES 613.48 613.48 POSTAGE 169922 03/19/2015 002110 UNITED RENTALS NORTH MISC EQUIP RENTALS:PW STREET 80.42 80.42 AMERICA MAINT 169923 03/19/2015 004261 VERIZON Mar xxx-6540 gen usage:Rori fire stn 121.11 Mar xxx-2941 general usage:TVE2 423.81 544.92 169924 03/19/2015 004789 VERIZON Mar Internet svcs:Library 5.35 Feb Internet svcs:children's museum 134.99 Mar Internet svcs:skate park 39.95 Mar Internet svcs:Library 5.35 185.64 169925 03/19/2015 009101 VISION ONE INC SHOWARE TICKETING 1,391.80 1,391.80 SERVICES:THEATER 169926 03/19/2015 004861 VON RICHTER, POLLY CONF: LCW PUBLIC SECTOR 265.86 265.86 EMPLOYMNT LAW 169927 03/19/2015 003730 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC TREE MAINT SVCS:VAIL RANCH 13,123.00 SLOPE TREE MAINT SVCS:VINTAGE HILLS SLOF 1,551.00 TREE MAINT SVCS:VILLAGES SLOPE 4,347.00 TREE MAINT SVCS:VAR PARKS & MEDIA 210.00 TREE MAINT SVCS:CROWNE HILL SLOPI 420.00 19,651.00 169928 03/19/2015 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE Feb '15 MSHCP payment COUNTY 30,396.00 30,396.00 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169929 03/19/2015 004567 WITCHER ELECTRIC replace lights:controls:vail ranch slope 1,855.00 1,855.00 169930 03/19/2015 009512 WURMS JANITORIAL MAR JANITORIAL SVCS:POLICE OT 269.57 SERVICES, INC OFC MAR JANITORIAL SERVICES:CITY FACILI 18,674.56 18,944.13 1000389 03/12/2015 017765 AITKEN, JAMIE Refund:Fun with Learning Centers 30.00 30.00 1000390 03/13/2015 017774 BOWMAN, ANNE Refund:Sec Dep:TCC Multipurpose Room 200.00 200.00 1000391 03/13/2015 017766 BRAUSE, MELISSA Refund:Basketball Tiny Tots 20.00 20.00 1000392 03/13/2015 017771 CERVANTES, OLIVIA Refund:Picnic Pala Community Park 60.00 60.00 1000393 03/13/2015 017767 DAYOS, KURT Refund:ACT Practice Tests 10.00 10.00 1000394 03/13/2015 017768 HANES, SONYA Refund:Bright Start for kids (Little 168.00 168.00 1000395 03/13/2015 017769 HERNANDEZ, PRISCILA Refund:Picnic- Harveston Comm Park 175.00 175.00 1000396 03/13/2015 017775 KINSEY, ANN Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 200.00 200.00 1000397 03/13/2015 017762 LEACHMAN, GRETA Refund:Adult Learn to Swim 35001.101 36.00 36.00 1000398 03/13/2015 017770 ORTEGA, ETHAN Refund:Lifeguard Training:Class A 175.00 175.00 1000399 03/13/2015 017773 PAULOS, JONATHAN Refund:sec dep:TCC Multipurpose Room 200.00 200.00 1000400 03/13/2015 017772 REINKE, RHONDA Refund:Sec Dep:TCC Multipurpose Room 150.00 150.00 1000401 03/13/2015 017763 SHAHAR, LAURA Refund:Bigfoot's Art & Pizza Party 15.00 15.00 1000402 03/13/2015 017764 WOOLLEY, BRENT Refund:Photoshop Certification for 64.00 64.00 1000403 03/13/2015 008299 MORALES, FELICIA Refund:SAT Practice Tests #9025.101 10.00 10.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,602,205.12 Page:9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 03/19/2015 11:35:44AM CITY OF TEMECULA 134 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,602,205.12 Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2662 03/20/2015 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE Feb '15 TUMF Payment 170,869.06 170,869.06 COUNCIL OF 2663 03/26/2015 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 2,654.62 2,654.62 SOLUTION PAYMENT 2664 03/30/2015 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAXES PAYMENT 23,552.62 23,552.62 2665 03/30/2015 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT 83,522.90 83,522.90 2666 03/26/2015 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 10,605.51 10,605.51 SOLUTION 2668 03/26/2015 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 1,439.52 1,439.52 SUPPORT 2669 03/26/2015 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 4,586.42 4,586.42 303355 PAYMENT 169931 03/26/2015 010851 ADAMIAK, DAWN reimb:prizes for '15 teen egg hunt 1,000.00 1,000.00 169932 03/26/2015 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, Apr 15 Employee assistance prgm 673.20 673.20 LLC 169933 03/26/2015 015083 AIR GAS USA, LLC Misc Stage Supplies: Theater 31.53 31.53 169934 03/26/2015 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT Dec Pavement rehab: pw cip - ynez rd 325,907.95 Jan Pavement rehab: pw cip - ynez rd 345,495.91 credit billing adj: exceeds contract -130.21 671,273.65 169935 03/26/2015 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES Piano tuning & maint:theater 185.00 Piano tuning & maint:theater 185.00 370.00 169936 03/26/2015 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT RENTAL ITEMS:SPECIAL EVENTS 33.25 33.25 169937 03/26/2015 001947 AMERIGAS Propane fuel: fire dept 780.44 780.44 169938 03/26/2015 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO Feb water system svcs: police dept 27.00 27.00 169939 03/26/2015 017797 ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. 3/10/15-6/30/16 ins brokerage svcs 50,000.00 50,000.00 169940 03/26/2015 011666 B P S TACTICAL INC Tactical vests:temecula police 385.56 385.56 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169941 03/26/2015 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC Description Amount Paid Check Total Temecula Library: Misc. collections. 10.38 Temecula Library: Misc. collections. 20.44 Temecula Library: Misc. collections. -32.72 Temecula Library: Misc. collections. 1,110.24 Temecula Library: Misc. collections. 25.44 Temecula Library: Misc. collections. 342.81 Temecula Library: Misc. collections. 1,023.18 169942 03/26/2015 013482 BAS SECURITY Security srvcs: Rod Run Security:Bluegrass Festival 2015 Misc security services: csd 169943 03/26/2015 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES Drug & alcohol analysis:temecula police Drug & alcohol analysis:temecula police Drug & alcohol analysis:temecula police 169944 03/26/2015 017806 BONFIGLIO, JOHANNA Refund:Library Lost Materials Returned 191.00 750.00 120.83 1,499.94 2,070.94 1,124.58 2,499.77 1,061.83 4,695.46 16.95 16.95 169945 03/26/2015 014718 BURT, KRISTAA. TCSD Instructor Earnings 217.56 TCSD Instructor Earnings 205.80 423.36 169946 03/26/2015 004248 CALIF DEPT OF Feb 15 DOJ alcohol analysis:temecula pd 630.00 630.00 JUSTICE-ACCTING 169947 03/26/2015 017698 CALIFORNIAAVERLAND pe 2/26 Theater remediation: pw cip 204,345.00 204,345.00 CONST INC 169948 03/26/2015 014726 CHAPTER 13 STANDING SUPPORT PAYMENT 205.85 205.85 TRUSTEE 169949 03/26/2015 015090 CLEARWATER SYSTEMS CORP prey maint hvac h2o sys:civ ctr 550.00 550.00 169950 03/26/2015 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES 24.00 24.00 CHARITIES PAYMENT 169951 03/26/2015 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 Misc. supplies:var csd special events 1,179.64 1,179.64 169952 03/26/2015 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & park improvement program:rrsp 15,500.00 15,500.00 HVAC INC 169953 03/26/2015 014580 DANCE THEATRE COLLECTIVE Settlement:danceXchange 03/17/15 119.00 119.00 169954 03/26/2015 012614 DBX, INC. Jan 15 Install traffic signal eqpmnt: pw 13,601.00 13,601.00 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 169955 03/26/2015 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & LUBRICANTS Description Amount Paid Check Total Fuel for City vehicles: police dept 44.53 Fuel for City vehicles: code enforcement 158.02 Fuel for City vehicles: bldg inspectors 227.49 Fuel for City vehicles: traffic - pw 293.66 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 926.05 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 1,120.18 Fuel for City vehicles: pw 45.97 Fuel for City vehicles: tcsd 437.55 3,253.45 169956 03/26/2015 004799 E C S IMAGING INC New purchase of additional Laserfiche 21,625.42 21,625.42 169957 03/26/2015 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Feb water meter:39569 Seraphina Rd 132.95 DIST Feb water meter:Murr hot springs rd 21.73 Feb water meter:Murr hot springs rd 25.01 Feb water meter:39656 Diego Dr 64.57 244.26 169958 03/26/2015 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE JAN SUPPLEMENTAL EIR:TEM VALLEY 5,145.00 ASSOC. HOSPITAL JAN ADDT'L ANALYSIS:JEFFERSON SPE( 813.70 Jan EIR for proposed Altair Specific 32,018.34 37,977.04 169959 03/26/2015 004836 EWING IRRIGATION upgrade irrigation sys: var park sites 6,415.89 6,415.89 PRODUCTS INC 169960 03/26/2015 015330 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL Jan 15 Fair housing srvcs:cdbg funding 1,359.12 1,359.12 169961 03/26/2015 017811 FELICIANO, ROSA & LINDA refund: dismissal: pkg cit# 317886 55.00 55.00 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169962 03/26/2015 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF RO CCAC annual conference registration 395.00 015247 FAMOUS DAVE'S RO rfrshmnts: city cncil session 03/10 263.68 014214 NEWEGG.COM TG car chargers for inspectors 73.06 016071 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS TG telescoping gantry crane 852.93 015626 EVENTBRITE.COM CW registration: future of cities 2015 35.00 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE IG newletter ad for 2/5/15 150.00 OFFICERS 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC RO rfrshmnts: city cncil closed sess 230.60 005531 FRONT STREET BAR & GRILL RO rfrshmnts: city cncil session 02/24 226.06 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF RO CCAC membership dues: Olson 210.00 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES TG '15 public works officers inst. expo 525.00 017808 VITA VIBE INC. KH 8ft wood double bar ballet barre 389.90 017809 LIFETIME.COM KH commercial table cart 472.97 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER AA chamber of commerce awards gala 375.00 OF 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC AA business development semiinar: TVE2 123.70 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC AA Riv. Co. education collaborative mtg 148.50 017737 SPECIALTY DESIGN & MFG INC AA ribbon cutting scissors/engrave blade 332.40 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING AA Registration: Butler & Comerchero 1,140.00 006952 PAYPAL KH Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction 220.00 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 45.59 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 119.95 000395 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AA rfrshmnts: mtg: kitzerow, walker, 75.00 CORP 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 71.46 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 19.41 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING AA memb. renew ends 50.00 1/2016:Comerchero 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING AA memb. renew ends 1/2016:Butler 50.00 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC AA SW T -Now mtg hosted by Edwards 110.70 015354 FACEBOOK.COM AA facebook promoting city government 20.00 017736 THE CORNER BAKERY AA grants funding subcomittee mtg 2/26 225.58 Page4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING AA global retail real estate mtg: 570.00 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC AA refreshments: youth government 3/3 174.95 013812 DFIT SUBS, LLC AA refreshments: youth goverment 3/4 435.00 013812 DFIT SUBS, LLC AA refreshments: youth government 3/4 85.00 006952 PAYPAL JH Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction 61.70 017091 1800FLOWERS.COM IG sunshine fund 71.92 013851 STORM SOURCE, LLC MH appointment plus:IT 20.00 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library -0.02 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 118.70 016691 WWW.PAESSLER.COM MH PRTG 1000 renewal 1,822.50 016745 LYNDA.COM MH online video trainings 3/8/15-3/7/16 375.00 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 20.31 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 84.08 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 28.19 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 33.98 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 226.59 017798 CRESTLINE SPECIALTIES KH margarita prk ribbon ceremony: supply 996.25 004074 FRANCHISE MGMT SERVICES KH margarita prk ribbon ceremony: supply 39.79 INC 017805 AMERICAS &AMERICAS INC KH light'em up blue ceremony 87.95 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 13.62 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CPRS renewal membership: Adkisson 165.00 SOC 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 40.74 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 75.61 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 205.77 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 258.22 017800 ZAPTEL CORPORATION KH light'em up blue ceremony: supplies 150.00 017798 CRESTLINE SPECIALTIES KH margarita prk ribbon ceremony: supply 452.04 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 134.30 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH '15 CPRS Conf & Expo: Washington, 729.00 SOC C Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 017501 LUKE'S ON FRONT 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC Description Amount Paid Check Total KH refreshments for meeting 02/09/15 71.51 KH '15 CPRS Conf & Expo: Frick, Tracy 115.00 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES KH '15 airefare CPRS Conf&Expo: Frick 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC KH misc collections: library 169963 03/26/2015 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 169964 03/26/2015 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 169965 03/26/2015 016184 FUN EXPRESS, LLC MISC PGRM SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES 169966 03/26/2015 001937 GALLS INC Misc supplies:Police volunteers 169967 03/26/2015 017804 GARLAND, MARIE Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 169968 03/26/2015 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Feb 15 misc offce supplies: Fire INC 169969 03/26/2015 005664 GOSCH TOWING & RECOVERY Gosch towing services - Police 169970 03/26/2015 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION JAN 15 :MAIN ST.BRIDGE REPLACE COMPANY CCO 41 169971 03/26/2015 008081 HALL & FOREMAN INC Feb 15 design srvcs: library parking 169972 03/26/2015 002109 HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY misc maint supplies:pw street maint LTD 169973 03/26/2015 004406 IGOE & COMPANY INC Mar 15 flex benefit plan pmt 169974 03/26/2015 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT Shred srvcs:temecula police 169975 03/26/2015 011228 INLAND PLANNING AND Feb 15 dsgn guidelines: uptown jeff DESIGN INC 169976 03/26/2015 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT Feb copier maint/repair/usage:citywide SOLUTIONS Feb copier maint/repair/usage:citywide 203.70 102.02 41.56 350.00 14,961.47 350.00 150.00 150.00 39.20 39.20 4.32 4.32 100.00 100.00 1,739.32 1,739.32 495.00 495.00 5,462.07 5,462.07 1,412.50 1,412.50 58.09 58.09 50.00 50.00 15.75 15.75 3,900.00 3,900.00 740.07 7,321.51 8,061.58 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169977 03/26/2015 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY misc pool chemicals: var pool sites 706.94 706.94 INC 169978 03/26/2015 004119 J T B SUPPLY COMPANY INC Traffic signal indicators:pw traffic 1,485.00 1,485.00 169979 03/26/2015 011841 JOE RHODES MAINTENANCE Fuel Pump Maintenance: Fire 34.52 34.52 169980 03/26/2015 004115 K T U & ASSOCIATES 1/5-2/1 BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN 4,459.25 4,459.25 UPDATE 169981 03/26/2015 017730 KASHMERE FAMILY TRUST, APR 2015 FACILITY LEASE PMT: 5,150.70 5,150.70 THE HARVESTON 169982 03/26/2015 017118 KRACH, BREE B. Awards:Santa's Electric Light Parade 727.06 Awards and recognition: csd 135.92 862.98 169983 03/26/2015 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & Feb 15 HR legal svc:TE060-00001 292.50 292.50 WHITMORE 169984 03/26/2015 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC CPR Class Supplies: Medics 695.93 695.93 169985 03/26/2015 015953 LLOYD'S DESIGNS GRAPHIC DESIGN SERVICES:ROD 1,000.00 1,000.00 RUN 169986 03/26/2015 015733 LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF Conduct yearly calibration 100.00 100.00 169987 03/26/2015 004087 LOWES INC Dishwasher replacement: Sta 92 56.45 56.45 169988 03/26/2015 017812 MAKENA MEDICAL BUILDINGS refund:eng refundable dep:LD13-058GR 50,000.00 50,000.00 169989 03/26/2015 011920 MASTER CONCEPTS LLC TCSD Instructor Earnings 294.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 220.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 588.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 661.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 220.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 661.50 2,646.00 169990 03/26/2015 017799 MEYER, ELISA Refund:Library Lost Materials Returned 19.95 19.95 169991 03/26/2015 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC AV collections:TPL 43.19 AV collections:TPL 242.90 AV collections:TPL 352.99 639.08 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 169992 03/26/2015 016445 MKB PRINTING & City stationery:building & safety: 43.84 43.84 PROMOTIONAL INC 169993 03/26/2015 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY, J. Merchandise:Rod Run 2015 25,251.00 25,251.00 169994 03/26/2015 001986 MUZAK LLC Apr dish network programing:foc 135.85 Apr dish network prgm:41952 6th St 57.62 193.47 169995 03/26/2015 015164 NATURES IMAGE, INC FEB 15 ENVIRO MITIGATION:FVP 905.35 OVERCROSSIN Feb 15 pechanga pkwy enviro mitigation 3,410.24 4,315.59 169996 03/26/2015 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS APR -JUN ASSN DUES XX16:F. VLY 514.71 PARK INTRCHG APR -JUN ASSN DUES XX17:F. VLY INTRC 478.36 APR -JUN ASSN DUES XX20:F. VLY INTRC 649.93 1,643.00 169997 03/26/2015 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR DEPT 15.08 DIV MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR DEPT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 23.75 15.54 85.99 140.36 169998 03/26/2015 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT:FIRE 400.41 400.41 PREV 169999 03/26/2015 016529 PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY SUPPORT PAYMENT 73.69 73.69 INC 170000 03/26/2015 012904 PRO ACTIVE FIRE DESIGN PLAN CHECK CONSULTANT:FIRE 9,833.40 9,833.40 PREV 170001 03/26/2015 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL JAN -FEB UNIFORM/FLR MTS/TWL 865.02 865.02 SUPPLY RENTAL:CITY 170002 03/26/2015 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER Feb Lndscp meter:41951 Moraga Rd 184.37 DISTRICT Feb var water meters:TCSD svc lev C Feb water meter:27499 Commerce Ctr Feb Recl. Indscp meter:Jefferson Ave 2,775.00 80.83 29.64 3,069.84 170003 03/26/2015 011853 RANCON COMMERCE CNTR bus ctr assn:archtect review & approval 150.00 150.00 PH2,3&4 170004 03/26/2015 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL 2015 ROD RUN CLEAN-UP CREW 4,750.00 4,750.00 MANAGEMENT 170005 03/26/2015 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR Feb '15 parking citation assessments 2,293.50 2,293.50 170006 03/26/2015 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 12/11/14 - 01 /07/15: LAW 1,521,531.72 1,521,531.72 DEPT ENFORCEMENT Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 170007 03/26/2015 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT Description Amount Paid Check Total info mgmt course:Dep. EG 6/8-12 173.00 interm traffic collision:CSO CN 5/18-22 staff training 4/20-23: Dep. LH & JP canine handler update:Cpl. Staat 5/27-29 206.00 566.00 177.00 1,122.00 170008 03/26/2015 012251 ROTH, DONALD J. TCSD Instructor Earnings 504.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 378.00 882.00 170009 03/26/2015 017561 RR DONNELLEY & SONS vehicle weight record forms:police 181.83 181.83 COMPANY 170010 03/26/2015 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD Instructor Earnings 315.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 630.00 945.00 170011 03/26/2015 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC SUPPLIES:CRC 209.09 209.09 170012 03/26/2015 015316 S & S INTERIORS, INC. GRANITE MAINT SVCS:CIV CTR SEAL 950.00 950.00 170013 03/26/2015 014522 S & S SEEDS, INC MITIGATION SITE SEED 314.46 314.46 COLLECT:PECHANGA PK 170014 03/26/2015 005329 SAFE ALTERNATIVE FOR CDBG SUBRECIPIENT:PUBLIC SVC 16,321.00 16,321.00 EVERYONE PROVIDER 170015 03/26/2015 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE ADVERTISING PUBLIC 626.88 626.88 NTC/LEGAL:PLNG, C CLE 170016 03/26/2015 009980 SANBORN, GVVYNETH A. Settlement:country at the merc 3/21 811.50 811.50 170017 03/26/2015 013376 SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES GEN CAMERA REPAIR/MAINT:CC & 278.00 278.00 INC FACILITIES 170018 03/26/2015 017365 SELSTAD, LONNIE Settlement:dixieland at the merc 3/20 98.70 98.70 170019 03/26/2015 017810 SERRATO & ASSOCIATES, INC. staff training:CSO SL & CZ 3/19 130.00 130.00 170020 03/26/2015 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - SUPPORT PAYMENT 213.89 213.89 CENTRAL 170021 03/26/2015 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Settlement:Jazz at the Merc 3/19 304.50 304.50 170022 03/26/2015 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW SIGNS:SPECIAL EVENTS 263.52 263.52 Page:9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 170023 03/26/2015 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Description MISC SUPPLIES:MPSC PROGRAMS- misc supplies:high hopes pgrm MISC. SUPPLIES:VAR CSD SPECIAL EVE MISC. SUPPLIES:VAR CSD SPECIAL EVE Amount Paid Check Total 241.95 216.60 712.98 118.16 1,289.69 170024 03/26/2015 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Feb 2-28-171-2620:40820 Winchester 640.44 Feb 2-29-974-7568:26953 Ynez Rd TC1 143.76 Feb 2-31-693-9784:26036 Ynez Rd TC1 366.46 Feb 2-33-237-4818:30499 Rancho Cal 101.31 Feb 2-31-419-2659:26706 Ynez Rd TC1 168.89 Feb 2-01-202-7330:various LS1 Allnite 79,899.22 Feb 2-35-576-2634:FV pkwy e/o jefferson 84.37 Feb 2-30-608-9384:28582 Harveston 564.57 Feb 2-26-887-0789:40233 Village Rd 1,958.10 Feb 2-33-777-1950:40135 Village Rd 684.72 Feb 2-29-223-9571:30395 Murr hot sprngs 55.54 Feb 2-00-397-5059:33340 Camino piedra 9,225.92 Feb 2-36-171-5626:Butterfield/La serena 134.97 Feb 2-01-202-7603:various LS1 Allnite 25,626.26 119,654.53 170025 03/26/2015 016939 SPERO VINEYARDS, INC GLOBAL CITIZEN PRGM:SITE VISIT 1,000.00 1,000.00 TRAINING 170026 03/26/2015 004163 SPORTS CHALET SOFTBALL PURCH:SPORTS PGRM 4,649.94 4,649.94 170027 03/26/2015 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC refreshments:skate park events 21.53 21.53 170028 03/26/2015 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HISTORY 69.75 ADVANTAGE MUSEUM misc office supplies:TCSD Admin 68.53 misc office supplies:TCSD Admin 14.03 misc office supplies:TCSD Admin 60.39 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CHILDREN'S Ml 36.71 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD ADMIN 114.25 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:MPSC 11.45 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HISTORY MUSE 2.29 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HISTORY MUSE 1.60 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD ADMIN 21.77 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVIC 64.16 misc office supplies:human services 19.75 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW 41.03 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PD OLD TOWN' 257.49 misc office supplies:PD mall storefront 114.91 misc office supplies:PD mall storefront 117.77 misc office supplies:PD mall storefront 59.35 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 13.82 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:FINANCE 11.65 1,100.70 Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 170029 03/26/2015 002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS audio equip parts:old town sound sys 2,173.82 2,173.82 170030 03/26/2015 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCE FEE:NTC OF EMERGENCY 200.00 200.00 CONTROL WORK:NPDES 170031 03/26/2015 015648 STEIN, ANDREW 2015 ROD RUN:REGISTRATION 4,668.24 4,668.24 MATERIALS 170032 03/26/2015 009061 STURDIVANT, ANGELA P. TCSD Instructor Earnings 514.50 514.50 170033 03/26/2015 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC MAR SWEEPING/BLOWOUT SVC:PRKG 500.00 500.00 STRUCTURE 170034 03/26/2015 011897 TAG/AMS INC DOT screenings:human resources 195.00 195.00 170035 03/26/2015 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD MISC. SUPPLIES:MPSC— 25.36 25.36 SRVCS 170036 03/26/2015 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL FEB SUNSHINE FUND 203.93 203.93 170037 03/26/2015 016668 TEMECULA STRINGS TCSD Instructor Earnings 175.00 175.00 170038 03/26/2015 004209 TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY OCT -DEC BUS BENCHES PLACEMENT 2,512.50 2,512.50 FOUND. & MAINT 170039 03/26/2015 010046 TEMECULA VALLEY JAN '15 BUS. IMPRV DISTRICT ASMNTS 104,360.79 104,360.79 CONVENTION & 170040 03/26/2015 009194 TEMECULA VALLEY NEWS ADVERTISING:TEMECULA PRESENTS 257.76 257.76 170041 03/26/2015 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY LOCKSMITH SVCS:HARVESTON PARK 224.60 224.60 CENTR 170042 03/26/2015 017415 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR REPAIR STAGE ELEVATOR:THEATER 4,821.00 4,821.00 CORP 170043 03/26/2015 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Mar high speed internet:32364 Overland 52.99 Mar high speed internet:29119 Margarita 71.93 Mar high speed internet:32211 Wolf vly 119.86 244.78 170044 03/26/2015 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC DJ/EMCEE:2015 EASTER EGG HUNTS 170045 03/26/2015 017721 TIMOTHY B DAVIS TCSD instructor earnings 400.00 400.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 170046 03/26/2015 017565 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT INC. BARRICADES:PW MAINT SPECIAL EVENTS 170047 03/26/2015 014866 TWM ROOFING, INC PARK IMPROV PRGM:PALA PARK ROOF REPAIR 170049 03/26/2015 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE Nov '14 Postage meter deposit Dec '14 Postage meter deposit Oct '14 Postage meter deposit Amount Paid Check Total 4,970.34 4,970.34 10,880.00 10,880.00 1,348.21 2,251.57 2,407.69 6,007.47 170050 03/26/2015 000325 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY CHARITIES PAYMENT 5.00 5.00 170051 03/26/2015 008837 VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL, MAY & JUNE ADS FOR TVE2 500.00 500.00 THE 170052 03/26/2015 008977 VALLEY EVENTS, INC. MISC RENTAL EQUIP:CSD SPECIAL 800.00 800.00 EVENTS 170053 03/26/2015 014954 VANDER INTERMEDIATE 2015 ROD RUN:LIGHT TOWERS 526.87 526.87 HOLDING RENTAL 170054 03/26/2015 004261 VERIZON Mar xxx-0073 gen usage:sr ctr, skate prk 123.06 MAR XXX -3738 GENERAL USAGE:JRC 131.86 MAR XXX -1262 GENERAL USAGE:JRC 126.91 381.83 170055 03/26/2015 004789 VERIZON Mar Internet svcs:TCC 129.99 Mar Internet svcs:city hall 289.99 419.98 170056 03/26/2015 004848 VERIZON Mar long distance phone svcs 7.61 7.61 170057 03/26/2015 017658 VFS FIRE refund:permit voided F15-0595 536.00 536.00 170058 03/26/2015 017807 WALLACE, MARIA refund:viol. dismissal:prkg cite #317714 305.00 305.00 170059 03/26/2015 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE REMOVAL SVCS: CIVIC CENTER 2,044.00 GARAGE ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING SVCS:ROW TF 11,407.00 EMERGENCY TREE REMOVAL:PRESLEY 115.00 13,566.00 170060 03/26/2015 017053 WOHLFORD, CHAD TYLER CONSULTING SVCS:COST ALLOC & USER FEE 170061 03/26/2015 006290 WOODCREST VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE CENTER 1000404 03/20/2015 017789 ALANIZ, ALANA Refund:Sec Dep:CRC Multipurpose 637.50 637.50 157.00 157.00 200.00 200.00 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 1000405 03/20/2015 017790 BUSHROW, SARAH Refund:Lifeguard Training -Class B 175.00 175.00 1000406 03/20/2015 017782 DERNBACH, HEIDI Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 100.00 100.00 1000407 03/20/2015 017195 LAMBERT, LORETTA Refund:Sec Dep:Harveston Center MPR 150.00 150.00 1000408 03/20/2015 017791 LOPEZ, VICTOR Refund:Sec Dep:Conference Center A/B 112.50 112.50 1000409 03/20/2015 017792 SAN ROMAN, BEN Refund:Frozen Inspired Dance Camp 220.00 220.00 1000410 03/20/2015 017793 VASQUEZ, ABBEY Refund:Bigfoot's Video Game Creator 64.00 64.00 1000411 03/20/2015 017794 WEIDMAN, GARY Refund:Temecula Rod Run Front Street 50.00 50.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 3,333,508.90 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14 03/26/2015 10:43:51AM CITY OF TEMECULA 145 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 3,333,508.90 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 03/26/2015 1:04:54PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 170062 03/26/2015 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE Oct '14 Postage meter deposit 2,407.69 Dec '14 Postage meter deposit 2,251.57 Nov '14 Postage meter deposit 1,348.21 6,007.47 170063 03/26/2015 000325 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY CHARITIES PAYMENT 5.00 5.00 170064 03/26/2015 008837 VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL, MAY & JUNE ADS FOR TVE2 500.00 500.00 THE 170065 03/26/2015 008977 VALLEY EVENTS, INC. MISC RENTAL EQUIP:CSD SPECIAL 800.00 800.00 EVENTS 170066 03/26/2015 014954 VANDER INTERMEDIATE 2015 ROD RUN:LIGHT TOWERS 526.87 526.87 HOLDING RENTAL 170067 03/26/2015 004261 VERIZON MAR XXX -3738 GENERAL USAGE:JRC 131.86 MAR XXX -1262 GENERAL USAGE:JRC 126.91 Mar xxx-0073 gen usage:sr ctr, skate prk 123.06 381.83 170068 03/26/2015 004789 VERIZON Mar Internet svcs:city hall 289.99 Mar Internet svcs:TCC 129.99 419.98 170069 03/26/2015 004848 VERIZON Mar long distance phone svcs 7.61 7.61 170070 03/26/2015 017658 VFS FIRE refund:permit voided F15-0595 536.00 536.00 170071 03/26/2015 017807 WALLACE, MARIA refund:viol. dismissal:prkg cite #317714 305.00 305.00 170072 03/26/2015 003730 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING SVCS:ROW 11,407.00 TREES TREE REMOVAL SVCS: CIVIC CENTER G 2,044.00 EMERGENCY TREE REMOVAL:PRESLEY 115.00 13,566.00 170073 03/26/2015 017053 WOHLFORD, CHAD TYLER CONSULTING SVCS:COST ALLOC & 637.50 637.50 USER FEE 170074 03/26/2015 006290 WOODCREST VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE 157.00 157.00 CENTER Grand total for UNION BANK: 23,850.26 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 03/26/2015 1:04:54PM CITY OF TEMECULA 13 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 23,850.26 Page2 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney PlAr" Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2015 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Revenue Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2015. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of February 28, 2015. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2015 Investments Managed Pool Accounts Retention Escrow Account Letter of Credit Local Agency Investment Funds Federal Agency Callable Securities Federal Agency Bullet Securities Investments Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Par Value 39,725,968.83 600,313 83 1.00 29,809,485.97 9,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary February 28, 2015 Market Value 39,725,968.83 600,313.83 1.00 29,808,950.21 8,989,960.00 14,042,680_00 93,135,769.63 93,167,873.87 1,862,607 90 94,998,377.53 February 28 Month Ending 27,494.35 99,935,447.40 0.36% Reporting period 02/0112015-02/28/2015 Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 Book % of Value Portfolio Term 39,725,968.83 42.66 600,313.83 0.64 1.00 0,00 1 29,809,485.97 32.01 1 9,000,000.00 9.66 1,228 13,992,950.00 15 03 1,370 Days to Maturity 7 1,130 544 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6430 YTM 360 Equiv. 0.105 0,000 0.000 0.262 1.201 0.896 YTM 365 Equiv. 0.106 0.000 0.000 0.266 1.218 0.908 93,128,71 9.63 100.00% 325 192 0.379 0.385 1,862,607 90 1,862,607.90 95,030,481.77 94,991,327.53 Fiscal Year To Date 200,115.91 90,870,193.28 0.33% 1 0.000 325 192 0.379 0.000 0.385 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3 0 Report Ver 7.3 5 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2015 Page 1 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 122216003-2 CITY COP RE2 ASSURED GUARANTY 1453718479 WORKERS COMP BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC 08/01/2014 104348008-1 01-2 IMP 2 First American Treasury 104348006-4 01-2 RESA2 First American Treasury 104348016-3 01-2 RESB2 First American Treasury 104348000-4 01-2 SPTAX2 First American Treasury 94669911-2 03-1 ACQA2 First American Treasury 94669921-3 03-1 ACQB3 First American Treasury 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2014 94669906-3 03-1 RES A3 First American Treasury 94669916-2 03-1 RES B2 First American Treasury 94669900-4 03-1 SPTAXI First American Treasury 793593011-2 03-2 ACQ 2 First American Treasury 793593009-2 03-2 EMWD 2 First American Treasury 793593007-2 03-2 IMP 2 First American Treasury 793593016-4 03-2 LOC 2 First American Treasury 793593010-2 03-2 PWADM2 First American Treasury 793593006-2 03-2 RES 2 First American Treasury 793593000-3 03-2 SPTX2 First American Treasury 744727011-2 03-3 ACQ2 First American Treasury 744727002-2 03-3 BOND 2 First American Treasury 07/01/2014 744727007-2 03-3 CITY2 First American Treasury 744727009 03-3 EMWD 1 First American Treasury 744727006-3 03-3 RES3 First American Treasury 744727000-4 03-3 SP TX 4 First American Treasury 94686001-2 03-4 ADMIN2 First American Treasury 94686005-1 03-4 PREP1 First American Treasury 94686000-1 03-4 RED1 First American Treasury 94686006-2 03-4 RES2 First American Treasury 786776002-2 03-6 BOND2 First American Treasury 07/01/2014 786776007-2 03-6 IMP2 First American Treasury 786776006-2 03-6 RES2 First American Treasury 786776000-3 03-6 SP TX3 First American Treasury 95453510-2 88-12 BOND2 First American Treasury 95453518-4 88-12 GI4 First American Treasury 122216003-4 CITY COP RE4 First American Treasury Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1 7,164.73 7,164.73 7,164.73 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.5 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2015 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 122216008-3 CITY COPCIP2 First American Treasury 122216000-2 CITY COPLPF2 First American Treasury 94434160-1 RDA 02 INTI First American Treasury 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 107886011-2 RDA 06 B PRI First American Treasury 107886008-2 RDA 06 CIPA2 First American Treasury 107886001 RDA 06 PRIN First American Treasury 107886000-2 RDA 06A INT2 First American Treasury 107886018-3 RDA 06B CIP3 First American Treasury 107886010-2 RDA 06B INT2 First American Treasury 107886016-2 RDA 06B RES2 First American Treasury 107886030-2 RDA 07 CAPI2 First American Treasury 107886027-2 RDA 07 ESC2 First American Treasury 107886020-2 RDA 07 INT2 First American Treasury 107886021-2 RDA 07 PRINC First American Treasury 107886028-2 RDA 07 PROJ2 First American Treasury 107886026-2 RDA 07 RES2 First American Treasury 136343006 RDA 10 RSRV1 First American Treasury 136343008 RDA 10A CIP2 First American Treasury 136343001-2 RDA 10A -INTI First American Treasury 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 136343000-1 RDA 10B -INTI First American Treasury 94432360-2 TCSD COP INT First American Treasury 104348006-5 01-2 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 104348016-5 01-2 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 104348000-5 01-2 SPTAXI I Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669922-5 03-01 COI Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669000-5 03-01 SPTAXI 1 Federated Tax Free Obligations 164741009-5 03-03 COI Federated Tax Free Obligations 164741008-5 03-03 IMP Federated Tax Free Obligations 164741006-5 03-03 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.000 0.000 1 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.000 0.000 1 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 07/01/2014 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.000 0.000 1 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.000 0.000 1 202,118.06 202,118.06 202,118.06 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.000 0.000 1 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.000 0.000 1 209,691.55 209,691.55 209,691.55 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1,104,098.02 1,104,098.02 1,104,098.02 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1,263,932.74 1,263,932.74 1,263,932.74 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 19,951.82 19,951.82 19,951.82 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1.63 1.63 1.63 0.000 0.000 1 5,186,975.06 5,186,975.06 5,186,975.06 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 3.05 3.05 3.05 0.000 0.000 1 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 440,470.15 440,470.15 440,470.15 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 188,644.15 188,644.15 188,644.15 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 583,644.62 583,644.62 583,644.62 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 2,144,215.40 2,144,215.40 2,144,215.40 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 144.51 144.51 144.51 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 07/01/2014 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 147,777.75 147,777.75 147,777.75 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 508,488.35 508,488.35 508,488.35 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 582,336.15 582,336.15 582,336.15 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 388.85 388.85 388.85 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2015 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164741000-5 03-03 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 164742009-5 03-06 001 Federated Tax Free Obligations 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 786776006-5 03-06 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 786776000-5 03-06SPTAXI 1 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669902-5 03-1 bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 793593011-5 03-2 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 793593009-5 03-2 EMWD11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 793593016-5 03-2 LOCI 1 Federated Tax Free Obligations 793593010-5 03-2 PWADMI I Federated Tax Free Obligations 793593006-5 03-2 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 793593000-5 03-2 SPTX Federated Tax Free Obligations 793593007-5 03 -2 -IMP R11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 744727006-5 03-3 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 744727011-5 03-3ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94686001-5 03-4 ADMINI 1 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94686000-5 03-4 RED11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 744727000-5 03-SSPTAXI 1 Federated Tax Free Obligations 146161000-5 146161000-5 Federated Tax Free Obligations 146161001-5 146161001-5 Federated Tax Free Obligations 146161008-5 RDA 11ACIP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 146161009-5 RDA 11ACOI11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 146161006-5 RDA 11 RSRV11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94432363 02001 Financial Security Assurance 793593011-1 03-2-1 ACQUI CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593009-1 03-2-1 EMWD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593007-1 03-2-1 IMPRO CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593010-1 03-2-1 PW AD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 793593006-3 03-2-3 RESER CA Local Agency Investment Fun 122216008 CITY COP CIP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 122216003-1 CITY COP REI CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886008-1 RDA 06 CIP-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 107886018-2 RDA 06 CIP-2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 07/01/2014 07/01/2014 07/01/2014 07/01/2014 1,086,609.88 1,086,609.88 1,086,609.88 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 158,160.25 158,160.25 158,160.25 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 234,770.80 234,770.80 234,770.80 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1,097.91 1,097.91 1,097.91 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 142,026.68 142,026.68 142,026.68 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1,887,185.66 1,887,185.66 1,887,185.66 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1,144.59 1,144.59 1,144.59 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 507.53 507.53 507.53 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 48,570.60 48,570.60 48,570.60 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 65,512.31 65,512.31 65,512.31 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.000 0.000 1 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.000 0.000 1 7,271,607.56 7,271,607.56 7,271,607.56 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 1,307,892.42 1,307,892.42 1,307,892.42 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 11,424,734.81 11,424,734.81 11,424,734.81 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 3,506,096.48 3,506,096.48 3,506,096.48 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Average Balance City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2015 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Stated Page 4 YTM YTM Days to Maturity Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 107886030-1 RDA 07 CAP -1 107886027-1 RDA 07 ESC -1 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO -1 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES -1 107886006 RDA 06 RES A 94434166 RDA TABs RES 94669905-0 03-01 REF 744727099-0 03-03 REF 786776099-0 03-06 REF SYS95453516-1 95453516-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun MBIA Surety Bond MBIA Surety Bond USBANK USBANK USBANK USBANK Subtotal and Average 36,733,929.89 07/01/2014 07/01/2014 07/01/2014 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,725,968.83 39,725,968.83 39,725,968.83 0.266 0.266 0.266 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 0.262 0.266 1 0.262 0.266 1 0.262 0.266 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.105 0.106 1 Retention Escrow Account 194012308-16 RJ NOBLE ARMY CORPS Army Corps SYSPI aza Prtnr PI aza Prtnr PORTOLA TRRC Portola Trrc 39211000 Summerhouse Bank of Sacramento Union Bank Wells Fargo Bank Wells Fargo Bank Wells Fargo Bank Subtotal and Average 644,881.50 0.00 600,313.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,313.83 0.00 600,313.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,313.83 0.00 600,313.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,313.83 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 1 1 1 1 0.000 0.000 1 Letter of Credit 104348006-1 02008 ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE Subtotal and Average 1.00 07/01/2014 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 Local Agency Investment Funds 94669917-1 164742006-1 94669911-1 94669921-1 744727011-1 744727007-1 786776007-1 164741006-1 SYSCITY SYSRDA SYSRDA 10 DS 2 Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 03-01-1 RES 03-06 RES -1 03-1 ACQ A2 03-1 ACQ B2 03-3 ACQ 2 03-3 CITY 2 03-6 IMP 1 0303-1 RES CITY RDA RDA 10 DS 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun 769,179.22 307,671.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,425,746.59 5,898,991.73 1,750.18 0.00 769,179.22 307,671.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,425,746.59 5,898,875.99 1,750.15 0.00 769,179.22 0.266 0.262 0.266 307,671.69 0.266 0.262 0.266 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1,425,746.59 0.266 0.262 0.266 5,898,991.73 0.266 0.262 0.266 1,750.18 0.266 0.262 0.266 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2015 Page 5 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Funds SYSRDA 10A CIP1 RDA 10A CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 21,406,146.56 21,405,726.57 21,406,146.56 0.266 0.262 0.266 1 Subtotal and Average 33,380,914.54 29,809,485.97 29,808,950.21 29,809,485.97 0.262 0.266 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 3133EDTQ5 01197 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/27/2014 1,000,000.00 999,260.00 1,000,000.00 1.590 1.568 1.590 1,275 08/27/2018 3130A1 VVX2 01195 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/28/2014 1,000,000.00 999,440.00 1,000,000.00 1.050 1.036 1.050 911 08/28/2017 3130A3NK6 01200 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/29/2014 1,000,000.00 1,000,550.00 1,000,000.00 1.150 1.134 1.150 1,034 12/29/2017 3130A3RY2 01201 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/30/2014 1,000,000.00 1,000,710.00 1,000,000.00 1.150 1.134 1.150 1,034 12/29/2017 3134G5JJ5 01198 Federal Home Loan Mfg Corp 09/29/2014 1,000,000.00 1,004,360.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 943 09/29/2017 3136G2A64 01199 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/28/2014 1,000,000.00 998,560.00 1,000,000.00 1.070 1.055 1.070 1,002 11/27/2017 3136G2CE5 01203 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/30/2015 1,000,000.00 1,000,820.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 1.550 1,431 01/30/2019 3136G2D87 01204 Federal National Mtg Assn 02/13/2015 1,000,000.00 995,450.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1,080 02/13/2018 3136G2EC7 01205 Federal National Mtg Assn 02/27/2015 1,000,000.00 990,810.00 1,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 1,459 02/27/2019 Subtotal and Average 7,642,857.14 9,000,000.00 8,989,960.00 9,000,000.00 1.201 1.218 1,130 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 31331KE55 01175 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/06/2011 1,000,000.00 1,009,990.00 1,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 585 10/06/2016 31331KK58 01177 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/26/2011 1,000,000.00 1,005,310.00 1,000,000.00 1.050 1.036 1.050 239 10/26/2015 31331KV98 01178 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/23/2011 1,000,000.00 1,005,670.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 0.957 0.970 267 11/23/2015 31331K2P4 01182 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/09/2011 1,000,000.00 1,005,840.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 283 12/09/2015 31331K6P0 01183 Federal Farm Credit Bank 01/19/2012 1,000,000.00 1,005,300.00 1,000,000.00 0.850 0.838 0.850 324 01/19/2016 3133EA6K9 01192 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/29/2012 1,000,000.00 1,000,970.00 1,000,000.00 0.410 0.404 0.410 242 10/29/2015 3133EDN0 01196 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/11/2014 1,000,000.00 1,005,840.00 1,000,000.00 1.200 1.179 1.195 1,047 01/11/2018 3133EEHU7 01202 Federal Farm Credit Bank 01/14/2015 1,000,000.00 999,290.00 1,000,000.00 1.410 1.391 1.410 1,415 01/14/2019 313378AC5 01187 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/22/2012 1,000,000.00 1,000,820.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 82 05/22/2015 313378QH7 01189 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/28/2012 1,000,000.00 1,005,510.00 1,000,000.00 0.900 0.888 0.900 393 03/28/2016 313381DZ5 01193 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/28/2012 1,000,000.00 998,650.00 1,000,000.00 0.550 0.542 0.550 667 12/27/2016 3130A4AJ1 01206 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/27/2015 1,000,000.00 1,001,090.00 1,000,000.00 1.140 1.124 1.140 1,094 02/27/2018 3135G0HG1 01190 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/05/2012 1,000,000.00 1,000,120.00 999,270.00 0.375 0.399 0.404 15 03/16/2015 3135G0PQ0 01194 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/26/2013 1,000,000.00 998,280.00 993,680.00 0.875 1.026 1.040 970 10/26/2017 Subtotal and Average 13,492,950.00 Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 14,000,000.00 14,042,680.00 13,992,950.00 0.896 0.908 544 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2015 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Page 6 Total and Average 99,935,447.40 Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 93,135,769.63 93,167,873.87 93,128,719.63 0.379 0.385 192 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash February 28, 2015 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Page 7 Retention Escrow Account SYSAAA#1202 AAA#1202 COMMUNITY BANK 44,597.32 44,597.32 44,597.32 0.000 0.000 1 4110170281 EDGEDEV TORRY PINES BANK 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 23303800 PCL CONST Wells Fargo Bank 07/01/2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Passbook/Checking Accounts SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2014 3,110.00 3,110.00 3,110.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSFIex Ck Acct Flex Ck Acct Union Bank of California 07/01/2014 27,113.55 27,113.55 27,113.55 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 1,778,764.03 1,778,764.03 1,778,764.03 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2014 9,023.00 9,023.00 9,023.00 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 1 Total Cash and Investments 99,935,447.40 Run Date: 03/26/2015 - 13:50 94,998,377.53 95,030,481.77 94,991,327.53 0.379 0.385 192 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Fund # 001 100 120 135 140 145 150 161 165 170 190 192 194 195 196 197 210 273 275 277 300 305 310 320 325 330 340 375 380 381 460 472 473 474 475 476 477 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 Fund Name GENERAL FUND STATE GAS TAX FUND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM AB 2766 FUND LARRY ROBINSON REWARD AFFORDABLE HOUSING MEASURE A FUND TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL IMPROVEMENT FUND CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND CFD-RORIPAUGH INSURANCE FUND WORKER'S COMPENSATION VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND CENTRAL SERVICES FACILITIES SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES Grand Total: Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through February 2015 Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total $ 26,398,540.12 564,547.40 4,400,808.11 18,629.89 172,879.82 476,264.92 25,174.08 (9,323.23) 2,595,567.19 1,661,341.41 197,023.41 3,527,562.17 19,902.61 303,373.97 105,561.28 8,318,457.41 2,144,341.70 582,331.20 12,201,131.34 465,043.16 168,815.68 1,451,830.03 1,249,428.15 136,045.57 485,465.92 399,552.28 2,471.00 18,768,763.80 668,940.72 88,486.02 1,295,578.97 1,550,689.89 124,375.73 2,890,333.68 496,995.87 6,892,982.97 12,306.08 65,120.48 39,510.99 3,996.23 8,045.45 31,076.01 3,497.63 45,719.76 21,000.16 5,973.68 1,619.83 47,263.82 1,904.88 3,154.16 2,256.93 77, 646.13 1,608.86 25,715.06 80,128.60 163,681.18 140,654.17 884.74 10,106.08 101,802.41 56,097.72 1,780.23 1,878.65 295,812.29 2,097.83 33,594.77 $ 8,269,385.99 $ 8,722,165.48 $ 25,945,760.63 $ 0.85 $ - 564,548.25 $ 147, 043.51 $ - 4, 547, 851.62 $ 2,675.03 $ 931.37 20,373.55 $ - $ - $ 0.26 $ - 172,880.08 $ 0.71 $ 1,704.90 474,560.73 $ 0.04 $ - 25,174.12 $ 125,117.06 $ 20,877.52 94,916.31 $ 253,206.49 $ 63,539.34 2,785,234.34 $ 225,300.68 $ 494,577.72 1,392,064.37 $ 0.17 $ 80,580.22 116,443.36 $ 0.32 $ 3,312,733.04 214,829.45 $ 0.03 $ - 19,902.64 $ 0.44 $ 11,819.12 291,555.29 $ 10,916.96 $ 60,136.40 56,341.84 $ 251,660.58 $ 720,689.06 7,849,428.93 $ 18.21 $ - 2,144,359.91 $ 4.95 $ - 582,336.15 $ 2,141.25 $ 413,224.80 11,790,047.79 $ 0.68 $ 15,264.91 449,778.93 $ 0.25 $ 1,590.73 167,225.20 $ 2.18 $ - 1,451,832.21 $ 50.74 $ 127,648.86 1,121,830.03 $ 0.20 $ - 136,045.77 $ 0.68 $ 31,975.26 453,491.34 $ 19,435.40 $ 74,134.23 344,853.45 $ - $ - 2,471.00 $ 159,731.78 $ 2,143,025.67 16,785,469.91 $ 159,617.53 $ 284,616.38 543,941.87 $ 0.13 $ - 88,486.15 $ 534,586.71 $ 536,282.16 1,293,883.52 $ 450,793.50 $ 452,492.89 1,548,990.50 $ 45,772.16 $ 46,914.66 123,233.23 $ 932,753.66 $ 934,453.13 2,888,634.21 $ 149,549.56 $ 151,250.79 495,294.64 $ 1,881,471.57 $ 1,883,058.64 6,891,395.90 $ 0.01 $ 2,380.02 9,926.07 $ 0.10 $ 1,637.66 63,482.92 $ 0.06 $ 1,765.14 37,745.91 $ 0.01 $ 364.40 3,631.84 $ 0.01 $ 1,774.28 6,271.18 $ 0.03 $ 8,013.28 23,062.76 $ - $ 1,019.08 2,478.55 $ 0.06 $ 6,530.91 39,188.91 $ 0.03 $ 86.86 20,913.33 $ 0.01 $ 318.15 5,655.54 $ - $ 87.22 1,532.61 $ 0.07 $ 3,836.68 43,427.21 $ - $ 1,352.24 552.64 $ - $ 608.52 2,545.64 $ - $ 679.19 1,577.74 $ 0.10 $ 11,681.18 65,965.05 $ - $ 112.08 1,496.78 $ 0.03 $ 4,792.79 20,922.30 $ 0.12 $ 2,165.71 77,963.01 $ 847.78 $ 32,068.22 132,460.74 $ 0.19 $ 13,509.19 127,145.17 $ - $ 218.19 666.55 $ 0.01 $ 307.31 9,798.78 $ 0.12 $ 24,794.52 77,008.01 $ 0.08 $ 1,873.95 54,223.85 $ - $ 90.42 1,689.81 $ - $ 455.11 1,423.54 $ 0.43 $ 9,112.61 286,700.11 $ 0.05 $ 134.70 1,963.18 $ 0.05 $ - 33,594.82 $ 102,125,849.05 $ 13,622,089.61 $20,717,456.89 $ 95,030,481.77 Journal Entries completed after January's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts / Disbursements columns. Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Environmental Science Associates (ESA) for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Audi Dealership PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an agreement with Environmental Science Associates (ESA), in the amount of $142,250, for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Audi Dealership. BACKGROUND: The City is processing a pre -application for a Development Plan to construct a Hoehn Audi auto dealership consisting of approximately 37,673 square feet. The proposed development will include a showroom, offices, and service area. The project is generally located at Temecula Center Drive in the Harveston Specific Plan, south of the existing Mercedes-Benz dealership. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, Environmental Science Associates will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) based on the previously certified Harveston Specific Plan EIR. It will include updated analyses for aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, noise, traffic, and water supply/ quality. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. The Developer has deposited sufficient funds to cover the cost of the Supplemental EIR. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED AUDI DEALERSHIP THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 14, 2015, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Environmental Science Associates, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 14, 2015, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than April 14, 2016, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed one hundred forty two thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($142,250) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Professional Liability Coverage: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effective date. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: To Consultant: 14. ASSIGNMENT City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Environmental Science Associates Attn: Eric Ruby 550 West C Street, Suite 750 San Diego, CA 92101 619.719.4200 The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Bobbette Biddulph, Vice President ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Eric Ruby, Senior Vice President Environmental Science Associates Attn: Eric Ruby 550 West C Street, Suite 750 San Diego, CA 92101 eruby@esaassoc.com 619.719.4200 Acting PM Initia Date: EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: Tlus scope of work has been developed based upon discussion with City of Temecula staff available project documents and information, CEQA statute and guidelines, City of Temecula CEQA guidelines. and assumes that all project description details including enginneering_ architecture. landscape architecture and land planning will be provided by the applicant s team. Task 1 — Project Management/Coordination!Preliminary Environmental Review Project inanagement,'coordiination and attendance at meetings will occur under this task. We anticipate approximately 12 hours per month for project management/coordination for the duration of the project. We have also included costs for meeting attendance and conference calls with the city and the project team for the duration of the project (9 months) and attendance at Planning Coinunission and City Council public hearings. Task 1 will include preliminary research and review of the project application materials, Initial Study and CEQA notices. SEIR organization and scheduling will also be developed as part of Task 1. Task 2 — Draft Supplemental EIR ESA will prepare an Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR for review by the C'ity of Temecula and the project team_. The Adnunistrative Draft SEIR will be prepared in accordance with the provisions of Sections 15163 of the C ECSA Guidelines. It will include the above outlined specific CEQA-required sections and will incorporate the balance of the CEQA sections contained in the original Harveston EIR by reference. Notice of Preparation / Initial Study / Scoping The City of Temecula will prepare a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study for the proposed project to solicit input into the content of the SEIR. Based on our preliminary knowledge of the project the following environmental issues will be identified in the Initial StudyNOP as being evaluated in the SEIR: aesthetics, all' quahtv/GHG, biological resources_ noise. traffic, and Rater supply/water quality. The City of Temecula is responsible for all CEQA and public hearing noticing and advertising costs. Document production assumption — Cite' to provide IS/NOP Document production The following outline sullullanzes the proposed organization of the Draft SEIR: Executive Summary-: The executive sununy is untended to encapsulate the entire Draft SEIR in order to provide a quick under tanding of the project s potential impacts. It will identify. in an overview fashion. the proposed project under consideration and its objectives including any design features of the project which will be implemented_ The executive summary will briefly discuss the environmental impacts associated with project implementation (whether beneficial or adverse, significant as well as insignificant), and will contain a stmullary analysis of the altelnatives to the proposed project. In addition the executive summary will provide an overview of the courts action and how each writ of mandate issues will be addressed in the SEIR. Section 1.0 — Introduction: The introduction will include the purpose of an SEIR and procedural information_ A detailed discussion of the Writ of Mandate and SEIR structure will be included in the introduction as well as a summary of the incorporation by reference process. In addition the introduction will sunlnnarize all of the impact analysis contained in the original Draft EIR. Section 2.0 - Project Description: The project descnption will be based on existing i nfonnation and include the project location and setting_ site characteristics, project objectives and the characteristics of the project. This section will also include the requested permits and approvals for the proposed project. In addition, this section will include a discussion of the past present. and reasonably foreseeable future projects and activities iu the surrounding areas that will serve as the basis for the cumulative impact analysis. Section 3.0 — Em1ronlnental Impact Analysis: For each potentially siginficant issue identified lin the N C)P Initial Study, this section of the SEIR will include a discussion of the environmental setting. project impacts. cumulative impacts, project design features_ level of significance before nutlgation, nutigation measures_ and the level of significance after mitigation_ The assessment of impacts will be consistent with CEQA requirements and will utilize defined thresholds of significance to deternune the impacts of the proposed project. ESA will be responsible for the preparation of the technical analysis with regard to the environmental issues identified in Task 3 below. Section 4.0 — Alternatives: An alternative site will be evaluated ul the draft SEIR. Alternative site plan design schemes will be developed for the project. and will be incorporated into the draft SEIR. For the purposes of this proposal., a total of one alternative site in addition to the mandatory no project alternative will be considered in tlus section of the SEIR. For each alternative, a descnption of the alternative_ consideration of the alternative- s feasibility- in relation to the basic objectives of the project (established by the applicant and the City)_ and a comparative analysis of the environmental impacts attributable to the alternative versus those associated with the proposed project for each of the environmental categories discussed above will be provided. Consideration of any further alternatives which may be required will result in modifications to the project budget. Section 5.0 — Long-term Implications of the Proposed Project: ESA will prepare the following CEQA- requir'ed analysis sections: significant uTeverslble environrnental changes and growth -inducing impacts_ Section 6.0 — Persons and Organizations Consulted:References: ESA will prepare this section of the SEIR to document all persons and sources that contributed to the environmental analysis. Subsequent to review by City and the project team of the Screencheck Draft SEIR, ESA will prepare the Draft SEIR which incorporates final changes. We assume that changes will be minimal due to early consultation with the City, previous approval of technical reports by City personnel, and submittal of the Screencheck Draft SEIR This scope of work assumes two rounds of screen check Draft SEIR review_ Copies of the Draft SEIR including technical appendices, will be provided for distribution. ESA will prepare the Notice of Completion prior to public circulation of the Draft SEIR and will assist the City in transmitting the required copies to the State Clearinghouse and required agencies. Docwnent Production Assumptions: • 6 copies each — Administrative Screencheck and Screencheck Draft SEIR, 1 electronic copy • 6 copies each —.Administrative and Screencheck Draft SEIR, 1 electronic copy • 30 Copies — DSEIR, 15 CDs Task 3 — Final SEIR/Findings/Mitigation Monitoring At the conclusion of the public review period, ESA will work with City to obtain all comments received on the Draft SEIR. An Administrative Final SEIR containing proposed responses to comments and revisions to the Draft SEIR, where required, will be prepared once all comments are received. It is assumed that if required, the applicant's technical consultants will provide any and all necessary input to the responses to conunent letters that may be required. It is difficult to predict public reaction to the Draft SEIR at this time. For the purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that public reaction to the document will be limited to a maximum of 15 comment letters. In the event that the public comments on the Draft SEIR are greater than expected, ESA will meet with the City to adjust the work progranu'budget as necessary. An Administrative Final SEIR will be submitted to the City for review. Upon incorporation of comments on the Administrative Final SEIR ESA will prepare a Screencheck Final SEIR for submittal to the City and project team. ESA assumes that comments on the Screencheck Final SEIR will be minimal, due to early consultation with the City and the applicant when comments were received. This scope of work assumes two rounds of screen check Final SEIR review. Subsequent to City review of the Screencheck Final SEIR ESA will prepare the Final SEIR, including findings. It is understood that ESA would only prepare the Statement of Overriding Considerations, which incorporates fugal changes, as an optional task_ ESA will assist the City in transmitting the required copies to the State Clearinghouse, required agencies and commentators. • 6 copies each —Administrative and Screencheck Final SEIR, 1 electronic copy • 30 Copies — Final SEIR, 15 CDs ESA will prepare a detailed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in accordance with Section 15063 of the CEPA Guidelines in response to any significant environmental impacts that may be identified to result from the proposed development. The MMRP will be submitted with the Draft SEIR and will be finalized once the FSEIR is certified. Environmental Issues Based on the knowledge of the project, the following specific issues will be evaluated and addressed in the SEIR: Landform and Aesthetics The proposed project includes the construction of a new automobile dealership and may result in substantial visual changes to the project area. Tasks • Review the architectural and site plans design prepared for the proposed project. • Analyze the existing visual character of the project site. Compare the height and massing of the proposed project with surrounding land uses and structures. • Discuss consistency of the proposed project with visual quality and design policies and guidelines of the City General Plan and Adopted Harveston Specific Plan and other plans and studies, as appropriate. • Evaluate the project site for potential nighttime light and glare impacts on nearby uses. • Prepare a visual simulation of the proposed project from adjacent residential areas • Discuss measures included in the proposed project to mitigate potentially significant visual impacts. As appropriate, identify additional or alternative measures to avoid or reduce any potentially significant effects to a less -than -significant level. • Determine the significance of potential project impacts on the existing character of the area. Air Quality / GHG Analysis Air Quality The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) under the local jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). ESA will assess the potential air quality impacts in the preparation of the Air Quality EIR section. Site preparation and constriction activities, as well as project operational characteristics, could generate substantial short-term temporary and long-term operational emissions of criteria air pollutants such as particulate platter and ozone precursors. The nearest sensitive receptors in the project vicinity include a residential conn unity approximately 500 feet from the project boundary. Constriction_ area, and mobile source emissions associated with the project may result in project emissions that exceed SCAQMDs adopted thresholds of significance. These new emissions, added to existing sources of air pollution and cumulative development planned for the area, could contribute to the degraded air quality within the Basin. Tasks • Discuss the local and regional climate, meteorology, and topography as they affect the acctunulation or dispersion of pollutants. • Identify federal, state, and local regulatory agencies responsible for air quality management, and briefly summarize pertinent federal, state, and local air quality policies, regulations, and standards as they pertain to the proposed project site. • Stunmarize current air quality conditions and recent trends in the project area on the basis of the annual air quality monitoring data sununaries published by the SCAQMD. • Discuss SCAQMD projections of future air quality trends over the life of the project as presented in the most recent Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), and the assumptions upon which the projections are based. Identify any policies or goals embodied in the AQMP that would apply to the proposed project site. • Identif_yr specific air -pollutant -sensitive land uses or activities in the vicinity of the project site or along roads providing access to the project site. • Describe the SCAQMD air quality impact significance thresholds for new developments. • Determine, at an appropriate level of detail, the potential for short-terin emissions of criteria air pollutants generated by construction activities. Estimate construction -related emissions for all project components using the most recent versions of ARB's OFFROAD and EMFAC air pollutant emissions models as incorporated into the SCAQMD-reconunended California Emissions Estimator Model (Ca1EEMod). • Estimate area- and mobile -source emissions associated with the project based on proposed building sizes and types and the project traffic analysis using the most recent version of CalEEMod. • The construction and operational analysis will include an assessment of the projects possible effect on local air quality, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter concentrations at nearby sensitive receptors. The analysis will be conducted in accordance with the SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds methodology. • Discuss the potential for air pollutant emissions from development in the project area to adversely affect sensitive land uses or activities, including carbon monoxide hotspots and toxic air contaminants, or to impede attainment of state or federal air quality goals. This assumes a qualitative approach to both topics. • Discuss conformance of the project with AQMP, and determine whether identified air quality impacts would exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance. • Assess the potential for the proposed project to create objectionable odors that could affect a substantial number of people. • Identify cumulative development in the area and discuss the potential for cumulative development to adversely affect air quality or impede attainment of air quality goals. • Identify practical, feasible_ and clear measures to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project on air quality that are identified in the analysis. Greenhouse Gas Emissions • ESA will assess the potential climate change impacts in preparation of the Climate Change EIR section. In 2006, California passed the California Global warning Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill No. 32; California Health and Safety Code Division 25.5, Sections 38500, et seq., or AB 32), which requires the ARB to design and implement emission limits, regulations, and other measures to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Senate Bill (SB) 97, signed August 2007, acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. The updated CEQA Guidelines include requirements for determining the significance of impacts from GHG emissions. The project will generate GHG emissions during construction and operations. The GHG analysis for the project will include responses to all questions in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions section of Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Tasks • Summarize the federal, state, regional_ and local regulatory environment relative to climate change and generation of GHG emissions. • Describe the existing setting as it relates to GHG emissions. • Quantify emissions of GHGs, primarily carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, resulting from construction and operation of the proposed project using the most recent version of the SCAQMD- reconunended CaIEEMod. And following the SCAQMD's methodology which includes amortized constriction emissions as part of the total project GHG emissions. • Address impacts based on the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist questions pertaining to GHG emissions. • Describe the SCAQMD's proposed GHG impact significance thresholds for new developments. Identify the criteria used to determine significance of impacts as applicable at the time of the analysis. Assessment of consistency with ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan will be performed to determine whether the project is consistent with the goals of AB 32. • Document conformance with the City's Sustainability Plan, including GHG-reduction measures. • Recommend appropriate mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from project construction and operation, if warranted by the impact analysis. Deliverables: • 1 (one) electronic or unbound hardcopy — Air Quality ; GHG Analysis • 2(two) hardcopy — Air Quality GHG Analysis Acoustical Analysis Noise generated by construction activities and operational noise from the completed project would increase noise levels as a result of an increase in local traffic and operational activities. This analysis will be based on the traffic report and construction equipment mix. Tasks • Briefly describe and discuss existing major noise sources at the project site, particularly the noise from adjacent roadways. Describe the existing noise environment on the basis of up to four short-term measurements carried out by ESA staff. • Briefly summarize state and local noise policies, regulations, and standards as they pertain to the proposed project. • Identify noise -sensitive land uses or activities in the vicinity of the project site, and along roads providing access to the project site, that would be affected by development of the proposed project. • Discuss the potential for on-site constriction activities to affect nearby residences and other sensitive receptors_ This discussion will be based upon proposed construction activities and scheduling information provided by the applicant. Otherwise, this discussion will be based upon peak noise levels generated by an assumed standard mix of construction equipment and activities. • Using the Federal Highway Administration- s Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108), ESA will calculate existing, future base case (i.e., without the project), future project case (i.e., with the project), roadside noise levels along road segments that would be affected by motor vehicle traffic generated by the project, to determine whether project vehicular traffic would adversely affect adjacent land uses. • Identify cumulative development in the project area (i.e., development that is under formal consideration or has been approved, and discuss the potential for cumulative development to adversely affect noise -sensitive land uses. • Identify practical, feasible and clear measures to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project on noise. Mitigation measures will be developed in consultation with the lead agency and responsible agencies as appropriate. • Develop and discuss measures to mitigate potentially significant noise impacts_ Deliverables: • 1 (one) electronic or unbound hardcopy — Acoustical Analysis • 2(two) hardcopy — Acoustical Analysis Biological Assessment / MSHCP Conformance Memorandum ESA will use available information sources, including aerial photographs, topographic maps, habitat conversation plans and existing biological and planning doctunients in the project region to document existing biological resources onsite and in the vicinity of the site. Onsite biological resources ae expected to be minimal. ESA will utilize the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and the California Native Plant Society's Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California to develop a list of threatened and endangered and other sensitive species with potential to occur within, or in habitats adjacent to, the project area. ESA will also obtain official special status species lists for the project area from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Tasks ESA will conduct a field survey to detail vegetation and wildlife habitat in the project area to identify the potential for special -status species, jurisdictional waters Wetlands and other sensitive biological resources, including wildlife movement corridors, to be present onsite. Potential special -status species that may be associated with habitats on, or adjacent to, the project site include: burrowing owl, California Gnatcatcher, Quino checker spot butterfly and other riparian bird species. For each special -status species for which suitable habitat has been identified in the project area, the following specific information will be collected or estimated: • Distribution and abundance onsite — observed or expected; • Historic and recent status within the area; • Habitat quality; • Ecology, behavior, and habitat requirements; and • Aspects of biology of each species which could be relevant to the proposed uses of the project site Once the above biological resources assessment is completed, it will be incorporated into an MSHCP confornnance report / HANS application for submittal to the RCA. • Deliverables: • 1 (one) electronic or unbound hardcopy Biological Assessment / MSHCP Conformance Report • 3 (three) hardcopy Biological Assessment / MSHCP Conformance Report / HANS Application Traffic and Circulation ESA will coordinate the traffic stud to be prepared by VA Consulting and will sullunarize fundings in the . WEIR document_ The traffic impact analysis will include an evaluation of construction related and operational effects related to the development of a new car full-service dealership_ The TIA will be prepared consistent with the requirements of the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation Element and the City of Temecula's current Traffic Impact Analysis Pi'eparario►i Guide. VA Consulting will conduct a scoping session with the C'ity's Traffic Engineer prior to initiating the TIA to ensure that potential on-site circulation impacts_ off-site traffic impacts_ and parking impacts are adequately addressed in the TLA_ Tasks • Background Research, Document Collection and Field Review Following a kick-off meeting with the City to discuss and achieve a consensus on the scope of the study via a traffic study scoping agreement_ VA will conduct research to obtain available traffic volume forecasts including RIVTAM long-range model runs for build -out analysis_ VA has assessed the trip generation of the Project_ which is anticipated to generate 1,227 weekday vehicle trips with 55 inbound and 18 outbound trips during the AM peak hour and 40 inbound and 60 outbound trips during the PM peak hour_ It is noted that the City of Temecula threshold to require preparation of a traffic impact study exempts projects_ which generate less than 100 vehicle trips during each peak hour. Therefore, this project meets the threshold for analysis based on forecast peak hour volume_ but by the smallest margin possible of a single vehicle trip_ A typical threshold for an off-site intersection to be included in a traffic study is a location that receives a minimum of 50 peak hour project trips. Based on a reasonable trip distribution_ the following six (6) intersections will satisfy the threshold of 50 peak hour project taps to warrant inclusion in this analysis: • Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive (4 -way stop); ■ Ynez Road and Date Street (signalized): • Ynez Road and Winchester Road (signalized); ■ I-15 NB Ramps and 'Winchester Road (signalized): • I-15 NB Ramps and Winchester Road (signalized): and • Temecula Center Drive and Project Access (new). Based on our analysis of project trip generation and distribution, inclusion of additional study area intersections is not justified_ This task will include assembly and review of existing relevant traffic studies and information on other future projects located ul vicinity of the project study area. as appropriate. This task will also include a site review to inventory existing roadway geometries and controls, the number of through -travel lanes on roadways_ pedestrian, bicycle, parking and transit facilities_ and existing land uses and development within the Project study area. The traffic generation of the proposed Project will be based on the latest Project site plan provided by Client and estimated using trip generation rates identified in Trip Generation, 9t11 Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The Project geograplucal trip distribution will be based m accordance with site development and the local and regional roadway/freeway network characteristics. • Traffic Data Collection This task includes performing am and pm peak hour traffic volume counts for use in the traffic operations analysis. The intersections to be counted will be confirmed at the kick-off meeting and identified in the submitted traffic scoping. The budget for this task includes counts at the five (5) existing intersections identified above. This task also includes up to six (6) 24-hour machine counts on roadway segments between study area intersections. VA will coordinate traffic data collection for this project with National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) who has provided this service to VA for many similar successful projects. • Project Trip Generation, Distribution, and Traffic Forecasts VA will determine project trip generation and distribution for both short-term and long-term conditions, if appropriate. Project traffic volume forecasts will be estimated using trip generation rates identified in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Future traffic volume projections will be obtained from the County (RIVTAM) or from existing traffic studies and will be factored to the analysis scenario years using approved growth rates, if necessary. The long -terns project traffic distribution may differ from the short tenni distribution because of planned improvements to the roadway circulation system and transportation network. The resulting traffic forecast!analysis scenarios for the study will include up to the following as appropriate: Existing Conditions — no Project; Existing Conditions — with Project; Project Occupancy Year - no Project Project Occupancy Year - with Project; Project Occupancy Year — with Project and cumulative projects; Project Occupancy Year - with Project and mitigation, if required; and General Plan Traffic Conditions (Buildout) — with Project. • Level of Service Analysis VA will use the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Operations Method (signalized) as included in Synchro software in accordance with City guidelines and parameters, to determine intersection level of service (LOS) at the Project study area intersections and project driveways. The scenarios to be analyzed at study area intersections and Project driveways include up to the seven (7) scenarios as identified above. Roadway LOS will be based on volume -to -capacity (v/c) analysis with roadway capacities as identified in the appropriate City or County Master Plan resources. • Identification and Analysis of Project Mitigation Measures Based on the results of LOS analysis above, VA will identify, as necessary, mitigation measures and Project implementation strategies throughout the study area to maintain required LOS (D) and mitigate potential traffic circulation and access impacts of the project for short -teen and long -terns conditions. Evaluation of potential mitigation measures will include an analysis of their cost, effectiveness, and feasibility. • Additional Specific On-site Analyses The VA traffic analysis will also include additional analyses that will include as appropriate, but may not be limited to, location and review of on-site geometric configurations and circulation, traffic signal warrant analysis, parking_ sight distance analysis, neighborhood impacts_ pedestrian access, emergency and large vehicle access. • Project Traffic Contribution The VA traffic study will also include an analysis that will determine the Project's traffic contribution at each of the Project study area intersections identified above, if and where traffic mitigation measures are necessary. The Project's contribution will be determined as the percentage of total Project only traffic to total with Project traffic volumes and will allow the Project. s "fair share" contribution towards the cost of required intersection mitigation measures to be identified. • Report Preparation VA will prepare a stand-alone traffic report that will include all tables, figures, and text as required to document the study methodologies_ conclusions, mitigations_ and recommendations for the Project. The report will include all LOS analysis doctunentation and all other appropriate back-up calculations in the appendix. • Deliverables: • 1 (one) electronic or unbound hardcopy — Traffic Report • 2 (two) hardcopy — Traffic Report Cumulative Impacts Implementation of the proposed project could contribute to cumulative impacts in the region. Cumulative impacts and mitigation measures will be documented and will be easily differentiated from project specific impacts and mitigation measures. Tasks • Compile a list of projects in the project vicinity in cooperation with the City and county and based on information provided in the traffic report. • Address the cumulative impacts of the proposed project in conjunction with other uses, existing and proposed, in the surrounding area. • Identify measures that would reduce cumulative impacts of the project to the City. Alternative Site Analysis Pursuant to Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines_ an alternative site or alternative location to the currently proposed sitelocation will be identified_ evaluated and compared and contrasted with the impacts associated with the proposed project site. Tasks • Clearly identify the process employed for selection of the alternative site and document impacts associated with the alternative site for each environmental factor contained in the original Draft EIR_ • Document the environmental sett ng, and impacts associated with implementation of the project at the alternative site_ Identify,- any required mitigation measures. Determine if implementation of the project at the alternative site vi11 reduce or eliminate impacts associated with the proposed project at its currently proposed location. • If the alternative site does not reduce identified environmental effects and/or is not feasible_ provide the basis for rejection of the alternative. EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule Schedule We understand that an efficient SEIR preparation and processing schedule is required for this project and that certification of the SEIR by the City will be the critical path for project scheduling purposes. The Administrative Draft SEIR can be completed within sixt weeks of receipt of the final land plan and all technical studies, if the applicant and ESA are confident that no substantial changes to technical studies would occur in response to City comments. The start to finish CEQA process for the SEIR is approximately 9 months. The schedule on the following page (Table 1) supports achievement of the major milestones of the project, and the certification of the environmental documentation. Cost Estimate The cost estimate on the following page (Table 2) has been prepared to outline estimated costs to complete the above outlined tasks. Reimbursable expenses, including travel/parking, etc. will be invoiced in accordance with ESA standard rate schedule. Our services will be billed monthly on a time -and -materials basis. Should the need arise for additional professional services beyond those set forth in the scope of services due to revisions to the project, the regulatory environment, requirements exceeding our specified budget allowances, ESA will only undertake such additional services upon receipt of authorization by the City of Temecula. TABLE 1 SCHEDULE — AUDI AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP SEIR TASK DURATION Task 1 — Project ManagementiCoordination Task 2 — Draft SEIR Preparation Prepare Administrative Draft SEIR and Technical Studies City/Project Team Review Prepare Screencheck Draft SEIR City/Project Team Review Prepare Draft SEIR Draft SEIR Public Review Period Task 3 —Final SEIR; Response to Comments Prepare Administrative Final SEIR City/Project Team Review Prepare Screencheck Final SEIR City/Project Team Re vie w Prepare Final SEIR Submit Final SEIR For Certification Ongoing 8 weeks 3 2 week 2 week 2 week e 1 weeks 45 days 3weeks 3'` 1 week D 0 week 1 week b 0 week 1 day This preparation period is dependent on receipt of all documents and electronic information_ Preparation of the document may overlap with other tasks and sections will be submitted prior to completion of entire document, in order to meet schedule requirements_ This review period is just an estimate, dependent on City schedule_ Assumes that technical report authors will provide responses to comments on respective technical issues vNthin two weeks_ Initial work on technical reports will begin during the NOP process in order to save time. Technical reports will be completed within about a week of completion of traffic report_ TASK TABLE 2 COST ESTIMATE — AUDI AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP SEIR Task 1 — Project ManagemenUGoordination/Meetings/Hearings Task 2 — Draft SEIR 3 Air Quality/GHG Assessment Acoustical Assessment Biological Assessment / MSHCP Conformance Report Traffic Report Task 3 — F nal SEIR/Response to Comments / Mitigation Monitoring Program Reimbursable Expenses (in-house copying. mileage, postage, etc.) a Document Reproduction Total COST $ 22,750 $ 57,500 $ 9,750 $ 6,500 $ 4,500 $ 18,250 $ 15,500 S 1,750 $ 5,750 $142.250 Cost Estimate assumes that the following will be provided by the city or applicant : topography, aerial imagery, land ptan, market study, grading and earthwork, preliminary hydrology_ and Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment and hazardous matenals assessment_ Document reproduction costs are variable, but can be reduced if copies of all documents are provided by the city's reproduction supplier which eliminates ESA's standard mark up on printing expenses. Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. for a Fiscal Impact Analysis for the Proposed Altair Specific Plan PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., in the amount of $36,000, for a fiscal impact analysis for the proposed Altair Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: Ambient Communities is proposing a Specific Plan, referred to as Altair, on 270 acres in the southwesterly portion of the City of Temecula, west of Old Town. The proposed Plan will include the four -lane divided Western Bypass, approximately 1,700 residential units, an elementary school, civic/education use, neighborhood commercial, clubhouse, parks, trails, and hillside preservation. In addition to the Specific Plan, this project will include a General Plan Amendment, Subdivision Maps, Fiscal Impact Analysis, Development Agreement, and City -managed EIR. The project site is generally bound by the undeveloped foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains to the west, Ridge Park Drive and Vincent Moraga Drive to the north, Pujol Street and Murrieta Creek to the east, and vacant land south of the future extension of Temecula Parkway (aka the western bypass). Keyser Marston Associates will perform a fiscal impact analysis (FIA) on the proposed development that analyzes the fiscal impacts on the City's General Fund over a twenty year period. The FIA will help ensure the continued fiscal health of the City's General Fund and assist the City in negotiating the Development Agreement with the Developer. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact to the City. The Developer has deposited sufficient funds in deposit account 001.2968 to cover the cost of the analysis. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED ALTAIR SPECIFIC PLAN THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 14, 2015, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 14, 2015, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than October 14, 2015, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed thirty five thousand dollars ($35,000) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Professional Liability Coverage: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effective date. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: To Consultant: 14. ASSIGNMENT City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Keyser Marston Associates Attn: Paul C. Marra 555 West Beech Street, Suite 460 San Diego, CA 92101 619.718.9500 The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC By: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Paul C. Marra, Managing Principal ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Attn: Paul C. Marra 555 West Beech Street, Suite 460 San Diego, CA 92101 pmarra@keysermarston.com 619.718.9500 Acting PM Initials: Date: EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Task #1: Initiation and Reconnaissance At the outset, KMA will participate in a kickoff meeting (Meeting #1) with the City and Developer to review the City's objectives, gather background data on the Project, and collect available budget information from the City. KMA will also tour the Property. We will review all background documentation, including the following: • Proposed Specific Plan in terms of land use mix, densities, and public facilities • The proposed division of maintenance responsibilities between the City and Developer (and successors) • Market value and absorption estimates provided by the Developer • The City's current General Fund budget and Capital Improvement Budget • The City's most recent Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) • Recent FIAs completed for other Specific Plans and/or General Plan Amendments in the City We will follow up with the City and Developer as needed for further clarification and/or additional information. Task #2: Preliminary Estimates of Revenues and Expenditures KMA will develop a preliminary fiscal impact model for the Project at build -out, using 2015 estimates, and per -Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) expenditure projections. This model will draw extensively from our recent work on the Citywide Land Use Economic Opportunity Study. Following this task, we will refine the model in Task #3 to: (1) reflect the unique characteristics of the Project, particularly the distribution of maintenance responsibilities between the City and Developer; and (2) project fiscal impacts over a 20 -year period. Preparation of the preliminary fiscal impact model will involve the following key work steps: (1) Collection and review of demographic and economic trends for the Temecula area. (2) Estimation of recurring annual revenues to the City, to include: • Property tax • Redevelopment property tax trust funds • Vehicle license fees • Property transfer tax • Sales tax revenues, including both direct and indirect (resident spending) • Business licenses, permits, and service charges • Fines and forfeitures • Gas tax, Special Tax Measure C, and Measure A revenues • Other revenues KMA will not address one-time revenues such as Development Impact Fees and building permits, which are used to offset one-time City costs. (3) Estimation of recurring annual expenditures for municipal services. KMA will address all major municipal services in the City's General Fund and the Temecula Community Services District, including overhead and support functions such as Finance, City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney, City Council, and Community Development. However, the largest General Fund expenditure impacts for municipal services are likely to be in the areas of Police, Fire, Public Works, Recreation Funding, and Parks Maintenance. (4) Determination of recurring annual net fiscal impact, i.e., revenues less expenditures, at build -out, in 2015 dollars. Once we have completed the preliminary fiscal impact model, we will review our findings with City staff and coordinate interviews with key department heads to refine our estimates of expenditure impacts, as described in Task #3 below. Task #3: 20 -Year Fiscal Impact Projection Task #3 will build on the baseline fiscal impact model developed in Task #2. We will then adjust the model to reflect the key factors outlined below. (1) We will meet, or conduct telephone interviews, with the major service departments to refine our estimates of municipal services to the Project (Meeting #2). (2) We will review the Developer's plans to absorb certain capital facility costs, and associated ongoing maintenance, and reflect a cost savings to the City for these contributions. (3) We will review the Developer's market projections for absorption of the residential units in the Project and independently verify the reasonableness of these projections. Based on this information, we will prepare a 20 -year projection of Project -generated revenues. (4) We will review the City's projected escalation factors for General Fund expenditures and incorporate these assumptions into a 20 -year projection of Project -generated expenditures. Based on the above work steps, we will prepare a 20 -year projection of fiscal impacts generated by the Project. Finally, on a qualitative basis, we will review and comment on potential off-site economic benefits as a result of the Project. These may include increased patronage, property values, and retail sales in Old Town, as a result of introducing high-end market -rate residential uses in close proximity. We will submit our draft technical analysis to City staff and schedule a teleconference to review our findings. Task #4: Report We will prepare and submit an Administrative Draft report in executive summary format, supported by technical appendices. This will be followed by a meeting (Meeting #3) with City staff to review our analysis and findings and receive comments and feedback on the Administrative Draft. Once we have received consolidated feedback from City staff on the Administrative Draft report, we will prepare and submit a Draft report. We will meet with City staff and the Developer to review our findings and analysis and respond to any questions (Meeting #4). We will address any issues or concerns raised by the Developer and prepare and submit a Final report. Task #5: Presentation We will prepare a brief PowerPoint presentation summarizing our analysis and findings and participate in up to two (2) public meetings (Public Meetings #1 and #2). EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule BUDGET KMA proposes to complete the above scope of services on a time -and -materials basis in accordance with the attached hourly billing rate schedule. Our total budget requirement, as shown below, is $35,000: this budget includes all labor hours and reimbursables such as travel, third party data and reports, deliveries, and other direct charges. Tasks Budget Task 1: Initiation and Reconnaissance (includes 1 meeting) $4,500 Task 2: Preliminary Estimates of Revenue and Expenditures $7,000 Task 3: 20 -Year Fiscal Projection (includes 1 meeting) $10,000 Task 4: Report (includes 2 meetings) $8,500 Task 5: Presentation (includes 2 public meetings) $5,000 Total $35,000 The following maximums are assumed: • Four (4) meetings with City, Developer, and/or Council Subcommittee • Two (2) public meetings • One (1) Administrative Draft, one (1) Draft, and one (1) Final report, each submitted in PDF format only • One (1) PowerPoint presentation Tasks ii - Task #1: Initiation and Reconnaissance Calendar Days from Notice to Proceed Deliverables Data request(s) to City and/or Developer Days 1-15 Task #2: Preliminary Estimates of Revenues and Expenditures Days 15-30 Technical analysis of preliminary fiscal impact at build -out Task #3: 20 -Year Fiscal Impact Projection Days 30-60 Draft 20 -year fiscal impact projection Task #4: Report Days 60-75 Administrative Draft, Draft, and Final reports Task #5: Presentations To be determined by City PowerPoint presentation Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Esgil Corporation for Plan Check Services for Fiscal Year 2014-15 PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Esgil Corporation, in the amount of $60,000, for a total agreement amount of $210,000, for Plan Check Services for Fiscal Year 2014-15. BACKGROUND: To assist with the high volume of permit applications the City processes, Building and Safety contracts outside plan review consulting services with Esgil. Plan review services include accurate code interpretation, review of construction plans for all applicable code disciplines, and identification of areas of noncompliance. The first amendment to the Agreement will allow the City to continue using Esgil's services for the remainder of the fiscal year. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. Applicants are required to fully cover the cost of plan check services. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ESGIL CORPORATION BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 14, 2015 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Esgil Corporation, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2014, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Building Plan Review Services" in the amount of $150,000. b. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $60,000 and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The FIRST Amendment amount shall not exceed sixty thousand dollars ($60,000), for additional building plan check services for a total Agreement amount of two hundred ten thousand dollars ($210,000). 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA ESGIL CORPORATION (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Kurt Culver, President ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Chuck Mendenhall, Vice President Esg i l Corporation Attn: Kurt Culver 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 280 San Diego, CA 92123 kculver@esgil.com 858.560.1468 Acting PM Initials? 4 Date: 2 Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with California Watershed Engineering Corporation (CWE) for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Pala Community Park), PW11-10 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with California Watershed Engineering Corporation (CWE), in the amount of $119,802, for environmental work associated with addressing bank erosion adjacent to Pala Community Park; 2. Authorize an increase to the contingency in the amount of $11,980. BACKGROUND: On February 11, 2014, the City Council approved an agreement to investigate solutions to erosion at three park sites (Pala Community Park, Margarita Community Park, and Butterfield Stage Park). On August 26, 2014, City Council approved the First Amendment to this Agreement to provide full working drawings for the improvement of Pala Community Park with a groin (spur) system. In order to complete the design, it is now necessary to address environmental studies and regulatory permitting needed to construct the improvements. Under the direction of the Planning Division, a proposal was requested from Bon Terra Psomas through CWE for the anticipated environmental permitting and studies. The cost for these services is $119,802. The proposal was reviewed with Planning and they concurred with the scope of the proposal. An increase in contingency of $11,980 is requested which represents 10% of the additional services of the Second Amendment. Upon approval, the resulting Agreement base amount will be $262,333, with an authorized contingency of $21,460. FISCAL IMPACT: The Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair is identified within the City's Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2015-19, and is funded with Capital Project Reserve Funds. Sufficient funds for the recommended action is available within the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Account No. 210.165.127. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Second Amendment 2. Project Description 3. Project Locations SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND CWE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AD REPAIR (PALA COMMUNITY PARK) — PW11-10 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 14, 2015 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and California Watershed Engineering Corporation (CWE), a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On February 11, 2014, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services," in the amount of $94,816. b. On August 24, 2014, the City and Contractor entered into the First Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services," to add scope of work and increase the payment in the amount of $47,715. c. The parties now desire to add scope of work and increase payment in the amount of $119,802, and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 5 of the Agreement entitled "Payment" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The First Amendment amount shall not exceed Forty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Fifteen Dollars ($47,715) for a net increase to the original scope of work involving full working drawings and technical specifications for improvement of Pala Community Park, the Second Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred and Nineteen Thousand Eight Hundred and Two Dollars ($119,802) for an increase to the original scope of work involving environmental studies and permitting, for a total Agreement amount of Two Hundred Sixty Two Thousand Three Hundred Thirty -Three Dollars ($262,333). 3. Exhibit "A" and "B" to the Agreement are hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA CWE By: By: Jeff Cornerchero, Mayor ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Vik Bapna, Chief Executive Officer Jason Pereira, Secretary CWE Jason Pereira 1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240 Fullerton, CA 92831-5202 (714) 526-7500 (714) 526-7004 jpereiracwecorp.com Acting PM Initial _ Date: 2 ATTACHMENT "A" Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the additional scope of work and associated cost as provided by the Consultant. 3 AT "A" CAE November 19, 2014 EMAIL Mr. David McBride Senior Engineer — City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Civil Engineering Design Proposal Pala Park Channel Restoration - Spur System Design Environmental Studies PR# 14268 Dear Mr. McBride, CWE 1561 E. ORANGETHORPE AVENUE SUITE 240 FULLERTON. CA 92831-5202 (714) 526-7500 PHONE (714) 526-7004 FAX www.cweccrp.Com CWE is pleased to submit this cost proposal for environmental studies services needed to restore and protect the Pala Park channel bank along Temecula Creek. It is our understanding that the items in this scope of work include those requested by the City environmental staff to move the project CEQA process forward, as well as the geotechnical work needed for the final project design. The work requested included: 1. Habitat Assessment with the potential need for focused studies for least Bell's vireo, western burrowing owl, and special status plants. The habitat assessment must also need to address how the project conforms to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 2. Jurisdictional Delineation Report 3. Phase .1 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment 4. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Impact Analysis The detailed scope of work related to this request has been developed by Bon Terra Psomas and is attached for your review. The permit applications for the geotechnical investigation will also be completed under this scope of work. CWE has included a 10% markup on the proposed work for project management and coordination. We have also added review time for the permit application packages, the jurisdictional delineation, and to attend the resource agency meeting. Several optional tasks are included in the event that they are needed during the construction phase, including the specific surveys for burrowing owls, Least Bell's vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers, and vernal pool brachiopod monitoring. These necessity for the optional tasks will be determined during the initial habitat assessment done in Task 1. The work for cultural resource monitoring would be provided by Bon Terra Psomas on a time and materials basis. Based on the above tasks, we have developed our scope of services and cost estimate. "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 4 A► \ N\E\ T 11A 11 Mr. David McBride November 19, 2014 Page 2 The schedule provided below includes the time frame for conducting the required surveys and shows the change in schedule for other project components related to collection of the geotechnical data for the project, which requires the jurisdictional delineation and regulatory permitting. If the NTP is provided sooner than December 15th, the study timeline will be adjusted accordingly and new schedule will be provided. Schedule: NTP Habitat Assessment Jurisdictional Delineation Regulatory Permitting Phase I Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Assessment Detailed Site Analysis Prepare 75% Plans and Specification Prepare 90% Plans and Specification Quantity and Cost Estimates Prepare and Submit Permit Application Packages Submit Final Plans and Specifications Task A — Burrowing Owl Surveys Task B — Vernal Pool Branchiopod Surveys Task C — Least Bell's Vireo/Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Surveys Task D — Cultural Resources Monitoring 12/15/2014 01/01/2015 — 02/01/2015 01/01/2015 — 02/01/2015 01/01/2015 — 02/01/2015 01/01/2015 — 02/01/2015 01/01/2015 — 02/01/2015 REVISED DATES 02/01/2014 — 02/15/2015 02/15/2015 — 03/15/2015 04/01/2015 — 05/01/2015 04/01/2015 — 05/01/2015 03/15/2015 — 04/01/2015 06/15/2015 OPTIONAL TASKS As detailed by protocol As detailed by protocol As detailed by protocol During Construction "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 5 AlrAc\-1-1,Ne.,QT 11A 1 I Mr, David McBride November 19, 2014 Page 3 Fee Estimate Task Fee Task 1 — Habitat Assessment $10,812 Task 2 - Jurisdictional Delineation $9,261 Task 3 — Regulatory Permitting Task 3a - USACE 404 Permit Application $4,576 Task 3b - CDFW Streambed Alteration Permit Application $4 576 Task 3c - RWQCB 401 Water Quality Certification $4,576 Task 3d - Pre -Application Meeting $3,901 Task 3e - Resource Agency Permit Process $9,976 Task 4 — Phase 1 Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment $10,975 Task 5 — Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Assessment $2,568 Task 6— Project Management $2,376 $63,598 Task A — Burrowing Owl Surveys $12,887 Task 8 — Vernal Pool Branchiopod Surveys $22,171 Task C — Least Bell's Vireo/Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Surveys $21,148 Task D — Cultural Resources Monitoring T8iM $56,205 Total $119,802 Terms and Conditions These proposed costs do not include any other items not listed in the above Scope of Work, Additional work and Construction Management services including bid and Request for Information (RFI) submittal reviews can be negotiated separately. This proposal and the pricing herein are valid for acceptance within 60 days from the proposal date. if you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (714) 526-7500 Ext. 212 or vbapna(aoNecorp.com. Respectfully submitted CWE Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 6 A TT M t jT "A" Mr. David McBride November 19, 2014 Page 4 Vik Bapna, PE, CPSWQ, QSD/P Principal "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." A ITActi 1\AEA,31-- 1Aoi November 6, 2014 Mr. Ben Willardson CWE Corporation 1561 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240 Fullerton, California 92831 Balancing the Natural and Built Environment SENT VIA EMAIL bwillardsongewecorpscorn Subject: Proposal to Prepare Technical Studies for Pala Park Slope Stabilization Dear Mr. Willardson: BonTerra Psomas is pleased to submit our proposal to provide technical studies in support of the slope stabilization efforts at Pala Park in the City of Temecula. Based on our e-mail exchange, the project will be conducted in two parts. The first effort will involve a geotechnical exploration to assist in the design of stabilization project; the second effort will be the conceptual design. The City of Temecula had indicated the need for the following technical studies: 1. lIabitat Assessment with the potential need for focused studies for least Bell's vireo, western burrowing owl, and special status plants. The habitat assessment must also need to address how the project conforms to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, 2. Jurisdictional Delineation Report 3. Phase I Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment 4. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Impact Analysis The City also requested a Geotechnical Investigation; however, that study will be prepared by others. It is recommended that the first three studies be conducted prior to the initiation of any geotechnical exploration because it will be important to understand the constraints and jurisdictional issues pertaining to the site. The air quality and GHG impact analysis is probably better prepared as part of the second phase when there is a better understanding of the actual improvements being proposed and nature of the construction activities. These studies will support the preparation of documentation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This scope does not include the preparation of the CEQA document because the City of Temecula indicated that document would be handled under a different contract. However, BonTerra Psomas is able to provide those services should they be requested. Given the location of the proposed boring sites, regulatory permits will be required unless alter review of the jurisdictional delineation, the boring locations can be pulled out of jurisdictional areas. Therefore, a scope for the permitting effort has been included. A separate document pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has not been included in the permitting scope. The geotechnical exploration would be Categorically Exempt as a Class 4 (Minor Alteration to 2 Executwe Circle Land) pursuant to Section 15304 of the CEQA Guidelines. Suite 175 Irvine, CA 92614 Tel 714 444 9199 Fax 714 444 9599 wwwPsomas.com 8 les ATAcc--ti Nve.i\yr Mr. Ben Willardson November 6, 2014 Page 2 The Scope of Work and fees for each of the technical studies and regulatory permitting is provided in Attachment A. At this time we are unable to know if the directed biological surveys are required. Scopes of Work for the directed surveys, as well as cultural resources monitoring are provided in Attachment B as optional tasks. Should you need additional detail or resumes for the key staff, please feel free to call me with any questions at 714.444.9199. Sincerely, BonTerra Psomas Kathleen Brady, MCP Vice President, Environmental Planning Attachments: A- Scope of Work and Fees B — Scope of Work and Fees for Optional Tasks 1R1ProposalsCNE,Pala ParkeOW Pala Park -110614 dou 9 T[' t•A'E.MT ItAt1 Pala Park Slope Stabilization ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK FOR TECHNICAL STUDIES AND REGULATORY PERMITTING FOR THE TEMECULA CREEK BANK STABILIZATION AT PALA PARK November 6, 2014 TASK 1 HABITAT ASSESSMENT $9,560.00 A habitat assessment report consistent with guidelines set forth in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) will be prepared for the approximately 12 -acre project site. The project site will be assessed for the potential presence of riparian/riverine resources, vernal pool habitat, urban/wildlands interface issues, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) jurisdictional resources. According to the Riverside County Integrated Plan Conservation Summary Report Generator, the project site is located within an MSHCP Criteria Area and an assessment of burrowing owl habitat will also be conducted The habitat assessment will include a one -day field visit performed by a Botanist and Wildlife Biologist to map the vegetation and describe the current conditions on the project site. Any notable biological resources observed will be mapped on an aerial photograph. A letter report, including the required seven graphics per the Riverside County Biological Reporting Guidelines, will be written to describe the results of the habitat assessment following completion of the survey. The report will include the following: (1) the methodology used to conduct the survey; (2) a general description of the existing vegetation types and associated wildlife resources on the project site; and (3) recommendations based on MSHCP guidelines. Per BonTerra's Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Riverside, the report will be submitted concurrently to the City of Temecula and CWE Corp, following a verbal discussion of results with the project applicant. Three copies of the report will be submitted to the City of Temecula. This Scope of Work assumes one draft version of the letter report and a final report, which incorporates required modifications. Any special status species observed will be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The letter report will make recommendations for focused surveys that may be required by the MSHCP. If the habitat assessment identifies species associated with riparian resources and vernal pools (e.g., least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and/or fairy shrimp) or suitable habitat for burrowing owl, recommendations for additional studies will be included in the report. Scopes of Work for these surveys are provided below as optional tasks. This scope of work does not include a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP). BonTerra Psomas will request a contract augment if a DBESP is required. TASK 2 JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION $8,150.00 BonTerra Psomas will perform a jurisdictional delineation concurrent with the Habitat Assessment field survey (Task 1) to determine whether jurisdictional "waters of the U.S.," including wetlands (if present), and/or "waters of the State" are located within the boundaries of the project's proposed impact area. The project's proposed impact area is defined as the ultimate limits of project disturbance including grading and any other construction -related activity that involves temporary and/or permanent ground disturbance that can be characterized as dredge or fill within "waters of the U.S.," including wetlands and/or "waters of the State". CWE Corp will provide digital files (in CAD or GIS) of the proposed project's permanent and temporary disturbance areas to BonTerra Psomas to be used for impact analysis. CWE Corp will also provide BonTerra Psomas with digital files showing existing topographic contour data (at two -foot intervals if available). R:1Proposals\CWEIPaIa Park1SOW Pala Park -110614 docx A-1 Scope of Work 10 ANT 1 1 Pala Park Slope Stabilization This topographic and project impact data provided by CWE Corp will be used in conjunction with digital color aerial photography to make field maps for the jurisdictional delineation. A Regulatory Specialist will conduct a field survey/assessment to each potentially jurisdictional area and will delineate the USACE and CDFW jurisdictional limits of each channel/drainage. The delineation will define the USACE jurisdictional boundaries based on the ordinary high water mark(s) (OHWM) on the project site and indicate the presence of any adjacent wetlands not within the jurisdictional OHWM. The presence or absence of wetlands at each channel/drainage will be verified through the determination of the presence of (l) hydrologic conditions; (2) hydrophytic vegetation; and (3) hydric soils pursuant to the 2006 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region and the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The limits of CDFW jurisdiction generally extend from the top of bank to the top of bank along the channel/drainage, or to the outer limits of riparian vegetation (outer dripline), whichever is greater. Any special status species incidentally observed during fieldwork will be reported to the CNDDB. BonTerra Psomas will prepare a brief Jurisdictional Delineation Report. The Jurisdictional Delineation Report would be used to (1) assist the design team in avoiding and/or minimizing impacts to jurisdictional resources; (2) provide the technical documentation necessary to support the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation; and (3) provide support documentation for USACE, CDFW, and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) permit applications (if needed). This Scope of Work assumes one draft and one final version of the Jurisdictional Delineation Report. TASK 3 REGULATORY PERMITTING U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit Application $3,622.00 BonTerra Psomas will prepare and submit a permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), following review and approval of the application by CWE Corp, to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The submittal package will include: (1) ENG Form 4345; (2) vicinity map; (3) project description and engineering drawings; (4) jurisdictional delineation report and map; (6) habitat assessment report; and (6) site photographs. The USACE permit requires the preparation and submittal of a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the completion of the Section 404 Permit. Therefore, this proposal includes these tasks. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form, used by the USACE to help implement Section 404 of the CWA where there "may be" jurisdictional "waters of the U.S." on a site, will also be prepared as part of the application package. Geotechnical investigations will likely be authorized under Nationwide Permit 6 (Survey Activities); note that this authorizes a maximum of 1/10th of an acre of temporary impacts on "waters of the U.S.". California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration $3,622.00 A Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration (also known as a Streambed Alteration Agreement) will be prepared and submitted to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) following review and approval of the application by CWE Corp. The submittal package will include: (1) Form FG 2023; (2) vicinity map; (3) project description and engineering drawings; (4) jurisdictional delineation report and map; (6) habitat assessment report; and (6) site photos. This task does not include the permit filing fee. R:IProposals\CWE\Pala Park\SOW Pala Park -110614 docx A-2 Scope of Work 11 ITActi A T ' to' k Pala Park Slope Stabilization Regional ional Water Quality_ Control Board Section 401 Water Quality Certification $3,622.00 A Section 401 CWA Water Quality Certification application will be prepared and submitted to the San Diego RWQCB following review and approval by CWE Corp. The submittal package will include: (1) certification application; (2) vicinity map; (3) project description and engineering drawings; (4) jurisdictional delineation report and map; (6) habitat assessment report; and (6) site photographs. This certification is necessary prior to the USACE concurring with discharges of fill material under the USACE Section 404 permit process. BonTerra Psomas will work with CWE Corp and the consulting engineer to identify appropriate construction and post -construction Best Management Practices. This task does not include the permit filing fee. Pre -Application Meeting $1,052.00 The primary purpose of a pre -application meeting is to obtain concurrence with the Jurisdictional Delineation Report in terms of delineation coverage and interpretation of the type and extent of jurisdictional resources that may be temporarily and/or permanently affected by the project. This meeting offers an opportunity for CWE Corp and their consultant team to provide a project overview to the agencies and solicit comments from the agencies concerning possible avoidance and minimization measures, as well as proposed mitigation to offset impacts to jurisdictional resources resulting from project implementation. BonTerra Psomas will schedule and conduct a pre -application meeting with the appropriate USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB representatives and CWE Corp to review the site conditions, the proposed project, the geotechnical impacts, and the Jurisdictional Delineation Report. It is assumed that a teleconference will be adequate for the meeting and a field visit will not be necessary. It should be noted that the report would be transmitted to all meeting attendees prior to the pre -application meeting. At the conclusion of the pre -application meeting, BonTerra Psomas will request formal approval of the Jurisdictional Delineation Report from the USACE and the CDFW. It is understood that the USACE has a new procedure for approving a Jurisdictional Delineation Report and that the final written approval may take between 30 and 60 days. Resource Agency Permit Processing $7,198.00 Regulatory services will include processing of the USACE, the CDFW, and the RWQCB permits including preparation of correspondence and telephone calls between the agency staff assigned to process the permit. These services also include any meetings with the assigned regulatory agency staff, CWE Corp, and the consulting engineer during the review process. It is difficult to anticipate all the processing requirements. A total of 20 hours is included in this scope of work for a Senior Regulatory Specialist. The fee estimate assumes that listed species are not present on the project site and Threatened or Endangered species consultation will not be required. If this amount is exceeded due to the USACE's and the CDFW's requirements to identify appropriate mitigation associated with project impacts, a budget augment will be requested. Note: This Scope of Work does not include preparation and processing of regulatory permits for the bank stabilization project or development of a habitat mitigation concept or habitat mitigation and monitoring program for geotechnical investigations or the bank stabilization project. If these services are required, a budget augment will be requested. R:1 ProposalslCWElPala Park\SOW Pala Park -110614 docx A-3 Scope of Work 12 Ps1T'`& - ME141— p%‘l Pala Park Slop, Stabilization TASK 4 PHASE 1 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 58,730.00 Cultural Resources Literature Review BonTerra Psomas will conduct a records search of the proposed project, including a V2 mile radius buffer, in the California Historical Resources Information System at the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside, California for cultural resources that are known to exist within '/2 mile of or within the project area. In addition to the archaeological records, reports, and historic maps, an examination will be made of the Historic Resource Inventory (HRI) maintained by the California Office of Historic Preservation for Culver City. The HRI contains listings for the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest properties. The records search is designed to reveal the nature and extent of any cultural resources work previously conducted within or adjacent to the property. The results of this research will be used to help guide the subsequent field survey and will then be compiled and summarized in a Cultural Resources Report pursuant to CEQA. Native American Scoping BonTerra Psomas will contact the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a review of its Sacred Lands File. The NAHC will provide a list of Native American contacts for the property and its vicinity. All listed contacts will be consulted for additional information not listed by the NAHC regarding any Native American sacred sites, Traditional Cultural Properties, or other cultural resources within or immediately adjacent to the project area. BonTerra Psomas will prepare and send informational letters to all NAHC-listed contacts. This proposal does not include any meetings or consultation with Native American entities, local historical interest groups, or other groups or agencies. BonTerra Psomas will submit a revised Scope of Work and Cost Estimate for the additional labor and expenses entailed should any of the following request further consultation or meetings: Native American contacts; local, State, or federal agencies; or any other group, individual, or entity. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment BonTerra Psomas will prepare a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment that is compliant with CEQA to ensure compliance with State regulations for the identification of any historic properties that may exist in the project area. The inventory will include a pedestrian archaeological survey of the project area and the results of background research and scoping efforts. Exhibits will be prepared by the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) division at BonTerra Psomas. This cost reflects incorporating one round of comments. Additional review time will be billed on a time and materials basis. Paleontological Resources Assessment To meet additional Cultural Resources requirements under the State CEQA Guidelines (Appendix G[5][c]), BonTerra Psomas will obtain a paleontological records search and literature review for the property. A qualified Paleontologist in the Vertebrate Paleontology Section of the San Bernardino County Museum will provide a Letter Report that summarizes (1) the geological formations underlying the property; (2) the range of known fossil types and localities in the vicinity; (3) the project's potential to adversely affect fossil resources; and (4) recommendations for mitigating any adverse effects to a less than significant level. Subsequently, a BonTerra Psomas qualified Paleontologist will conduct a pedestrian inspection of the project to determine if any significant fossils are present in either the surface soils or visible in embankments. The result of these efforts will be compiled in a report. The report will R:1Proposals\CWE\PaIa ParkISOW Pala Park -110614 docx A-4 Scope of Work 13 AT 'f' tt M'Ex. 1 t pry t Pala Park Slope Stabilization contain the results of the records search, the field inspection, and will provide recommendations that will effectively reduce potential impacts to fossils to a level of less than significant. TASK 5 AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IMPACT ASSESSMENT $2,200.00 BonTerra Psomas will prepare an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions impact analysis for the proposed project. The analysis will include calculations demonstrating that construction emissions would be less than South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for potential significant air quality and GHG emissions impacts. BonTerra Psomas assumes that the City is preparing a CEQA environmental document for the proposed project. Therefore, the analysis will include qualitative discussions for CEQA Appendix G checklist questions relating to consistency with air quality management plans, cumulative air quality impacts, exposure of receptors to air pollutants and odors, and consistency with plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions. The results will be included in a technical memorandum. TASK 6 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $2,160.00 BonTerra Psomas will spend up to 12 hours performing project management and coordination tasks. It is assumed that the BonTerra Psomas Project Manager will attend one meeting to discuss the results of the studies. Additional time beyond this effort will either be billed on a time -and -materials basis after prior approval, or will require a budget augment. TOTAL BUDGET FOR TECHNICAL STUDIES AND PERMITTING $49,916.00 R:IProposals\CWE\Pala Park1SOW Pala Park -110614 docx A-5 Scope of Work 14 MT't-} M.1- W Pala Park Slope Stabilization ATTACHMENT B SCOPE OF WORK FOR OPTIONAL TASKS FOR TEMECULA CREEK BANK STABILIZATION AT PALA PARK November 6, 2014 TASK A BURROWING OWL SURVEYS S11,715.00 Focused surveys will be conducted following both the March 2006 Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area and the 2012 California Department of Fish and Game' (CDFG) protocol (CDFG 2012). Surveys for the burrowing owl will be conducted by a qualified Biologist. The surveys will cover all suitable habitats (e.g., grassland, disturbed areas, channels, road edges, or other open vegetation types) in the project survey area. The project survey area will include the project plus a 500 -foot buffer surrounding the project. However, the 500 -foot buffer will only be inspected visually from the project boundaries unless the client obtains permission from the adjacent landowners for surveys to be conducted on their property. A focused burrow survey will be conducted for natural burrows or suitable man-made structures during the burrowing owl breeding season (i.e., March 1 through August 31). The burrow survey will be conducted by walking transects at regularly spaced intervals, depending on topography and vegetative cover, to achieve 100 percent visual coverage of all potential habitat within the project survey area. Any burrows observed will be inspected for evidence of occupation by burrowing owls. The locations of active burrows, potential burrows (approximately four inches in diameter and approximately five feet deep), or burrowing owl observations will be mapped on an aerial photograph and recorded with a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. Data will be collected on general habitat characteristics for each active or potential burrow observed. This work effort assumes approximately 17 acres of suitable habitat for this species are present in the project survey area. Per the protocol for this species, no more than 100 acres will be surveyed per Biologist per day. A total one field days would be required to cover the project survey area each survey visit; therefore, this Scope of Work assumes a total of four Biologists field days to complete the work throughout the project survey area. If active or potential burrows are detected, focused owl surveys will be conducted. A total of four surveys will be conducted during the burrowing owl breeding season, timed to comply with the requirements of both protocols: Survey 1 will be conducted from March 1 to April 15; Surveys 2 and 3 will be conducted from April 16 to June 15; and Survey 4 will be conducted from June 16 to July 15. Surveys will be conducted at least three weeks apart. The surveys will be conducted during appropriate weather conditions from either two hours before sunset to one hour after, or from one hour before sunrise to two hours after. Surveys will not be conducted in conditions which include temperatures less than approximately 68 degrees Fahrenheit, precipitation, dense fog, or wind speeds greater than approximately 12 miles/hour. All potential habitat within the project site will be surveyed by walking in straight-line transects to allow 100 percent visual coverage of the project survey area. The transects should be spaced no more than approximately 65 feet apart and should be reduced to no less than approximately 20 feet apart to account for differences in terrain, vegetation density, and ground surface visibility. At the start of each transect and, at least, every approximately 300 feet, the project survey area will be scanned for burrowing owls or burrowing owl sign (e.g., pellets, prey remains, whitewash, or decoration) using binoculars. Any active burrows and burrowing owl sightings will be mapped on an aerial photograph and recorded with a GPS unit. The number of burrowing owls will be noted on each visit and data will be collected on general habitat characteristics for each burrowing owl observed. Any pertinent behavior will also be recorded. The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) changed its name to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) effective January 1, 2013. References to publications will refer to the agency's name at publication of the document R: 1ProposalslCWE\Pala Park1SOW Pala Park -110614 docx B-1 Scope of Work Optional Tasks 15 AV c.t't ma' "A" Pala Park Slope Stabilization Upon completion of the survey effort, a letter report will be prepared on the survey findings. The letter will include a methods and results section with locations and descriptions of any burrowing owls observed. Per BonTerra's Memorandum of Understanding with the County of Riverside, the report will be submitted concurrently to the City of Temecula and CWE Corp. This Scope of Work assumes one version of the letter report. Any special status species observed during the surveys will be reported to the CDFW's California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) as required by the surveying Biologist's permit conditions. TASK B VERNAL POOL BRANCHIOPOD SURVEYS The purpose of these surveys is to determine the presence or absence of federally listed vernal pool branchiopod species on the project site. Surveys will be conducted according to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) 1996 Interim Survey Guidelines to Permittees for Recovery Permits under Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for the Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods. A complete survey includes two full wet season surveys done within a five-year period or two consecutive seasons of one full wet season survey and one dry season survey. Surveys will be performed by a biologist with the required USFWS permit. The USFWS requires a ten-day notification prior to the anticipated start date of the surveys. Task B1 Wet Season Surveys $17,025.00 Surveys will begin after initial storm events to determine when pools/swales have been sufficiently inundated to begin the surveys (i.e., greater than 3 centimeters of standing water for 24 hours after a rain event). Following rainfall events, the hydrology of the pools on the project site will be monitored. This fee estimate includes up to four monitoring visits before surveys are initiated. Once the pools are sufficiently inundated, surveys will begin no later than two weeks following the initial inundation and continue once every two weeks until pools are no longer inundated or until they have experienced 120 days of continuous inundation. This Scope of Work assumes that the ponds will be continuously inundated, and includes eight survey visits. If the pools dry and pond a second time during the season, additional surveys may be required and additional fees may be necessary. If a listed species is observed during a wet season survey, the USFWS will be notified within ten working days and subsequent surveys will not be required. Upon completion of the survey effort, a letter report will be prepared based on the survey findings. A copy of the report will be submitted to the USFWS within 90 days of completion of surveys, as required by the surveying Biologist's 10(a)(1)(A) permit requirements. This Scope of Work assumes one version of the letter report. Revisions to the report will be billed on a time -and -materials basis using the budget. Voucher specimens of all listed vernal pool branchiopod species will be collected and deposited to either the California Academy of Sciences or the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Any special status species observed will be reported to the CNDDB. Task B2 Dry Season Surveys $3,130.00 In accordance with USFWS dry season survey guidelines, soil shall be collected when it is dry to avoid damaging or destroying fairy shrimp cysts, which are more fragile when wet. The permitted Biologist should collect approximately one -liter volume sample per pool off the top one to three centimeters of pool sediment. A total of 10 soil samples of approximately 100 milliliters each shall be taken from each pool for a total soil sample volume of approximately one liter per pool. The soil samples will be processed and cyst density will be determined by the permitted Biologist. Cysts will be cultured and reared to adulthood for identification by the permitted Biologist. Upon completion of the survey effort, a letter report will be prepared based on the survey findings. A copy of the report will be submitted to the USFWS within 90 days of completion of surveys, as required R:1Proposals\CWE\Pala Park\SOW Pala Park -110614 docx B-2 Scope of Work Optional Tasks 16 A TV.AGt-t \ T z Pala Park Slope Stabilization by the surveying biologist's 10(a)(1)(A) permit requirements. This Scope of Work assumes one version of the letter report. Revisions to the report will be billed on a time -and -materials basis using the budget. Voucher specimens of all listed vernal pool branchiopod species will be collected and deposited to either the California Academy of Sciences or the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Any special status species observed will be reported to the CNDDB. TASK C LEAST BELL'S VIREO/SOUTHWESTERN WILLOW FLYCATCHER SURVEYS $19,225.00 Because of the similar ecological requirements, surveys for the least Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher can be conducted simultaneously. Focused surveys will follow the USFWS 2001 and Sogge et. al 2010 protocol each species. Surveys for the least Bell's vireo will be conducted by a qualified Biologist, and surveys for the southwestern willow flycatcher will be conducted by a qualified Biologist with the required USFWS 10(a)(1)(A) permit. The USFWS requires a ten-day notification prior to the anticipated start date of the flycatcher surveys. Focused surveys for the least Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher will be conducted within all suitable habitat (i.e., riparian vegetation) in the project survey area. The least Bell's vireo protocol requires that a total of eight surveys be conducted at approximately ten-day intervals starting after April 10 and ending by July 31. The southwestern willow flycatcher protocol requires a minimum of five surveys to be performed within specified time periods: Survey 1 from May 15 to May 31; Surveys 2 and 3 from June 1 to June 24; and Surveys 4 and 5 from June 25 to July 17; surveys must be conducted at least five days apart. Recordings of southwestern willow flycatcher vocalizations will be played to solicit a response from any individual that may be present. Recordings will not be used for the least Bell's vireo as they are not required by the protocol. All surveys will be conducted during appropriate weather conditions, generally between dawn and 11:00 A.M. The locations where flycatchers/vireo are first observed will be mapped on an aerial photograph and recorded with a GPS unit. The number of birds (individuals or pairs) will be noted on each subsequent visit and data will be collected on general habitat characteristics for any Least Bell's vireo or southwestern willow flycatcher observed. Any pertinent behavior will also be recorded. This work effort assumes up to 12 acres of suitable habitat for these species are present in the project survey area. Upon completion of the survey effort, a letter report will be prepared on the survey findings. The letter will include a methods and results section with locations and descriptions of any least Bell's vireo or southwestern willow flycatcher observed, and the willow flycatcher and least Bell's vireo survey and detection forms. A draft of the report will be submitted to CWE Corp for review. The final report will be submitted to the USFWS and the CWE Corp within 45 days of the last survey, as required by the surveying Biologist's 10(a)(1)(A) permit requirements. Any special status species observed during the surveys will be reported to the CNDDB as required by the surveying Biologist's permit conditions. TASK D CULTURAL RESOURCES MONITORING To ensure impacts to archaeological and paleontological resources are reduced to a level of no significant impact, BonTerra Psomas provides both professionally qualified Archaeological and Paleontological Monitors. BonTerra Psomas' hourly monitoring rate for a cross -trained Archaeological/Paleontological Monitor is $90.00. Actual cost will depend on the duration of monitoring. Native American monitoring through the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians may also be necessary. R:IProposals\CWElPala Park\SOW Pala Park -110614 docx B-3 Scope of Work — Optional Tasks 17 2015-16 2017-18 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR Parks and Recreation Project Project Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between specific park sites and flood control channels, and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park sites. These park sites include Pala Community Park, Margarita Community Park, Butterfield Stage Park, and Long Canyon Creek Park. Benefit / Core Value: This project prevents further erosion into specific park sites. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: A priority list of projects has been developed. Repairs and reinforcements are completed on an ongoing basis. A study of the affected Parks is underway and will be completed during FY 2014-15. Design and construction of the recommended fixes will be implemented based on available fund. Department: Public Works / Temecula Community Services Account No. 210.190.127 Level: Project Cost: Fiscal Year Prior Years Ended 2014 2014-15 Actual Carryover Adopted 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration $ 10,841 $ 59,159 $ 70, 000 Construction $ 45,531 $ 260,169 $250,000 $250,000 $ 805, 700 Construction $250,000 $ 250,000 Engineering $ 56,372 $ 20, 000 $ - $250,000 $ - $250,000 $ - $ 20, 000 Design $ 104,300 $ 104,300 Totals $ 56,372 $ 443, 628 $ - $250,000 $ - $250,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Source of Funds: Fiscal Year Prior Years Ended 2014 2014-15 Actual Carryover Adopted 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Capital Project Reserves $ 56,372 $ 443,628 $250,000 $ 750,000 Unspecified* $250,000 $ 250,000 Total Funding: $ 56,372 $ 443,628 $ - $250,000 $ - $250,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs 2014-15 *Project cannot be constructed until a funding source is identified. 133 2016-17 2018-19 'J11E CUrt r rt TEMECULA r.Nd Tr hila. Nev. r r�q�,rl�H,itiea Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair 0 Harvestort L�keiPark, N icoiasRoad Park nit Park Y 4,4 \Harveston CommAtik,,,46. irsa u Riverton Park Serena Hills -Park Long Canyon Creek Park 041ktIre: TemekuHills Par'k- r.,,, VeteranseParkVIA A 6,, 411\7e IPIN&40••• jaririAIS l*rir41‘PT°6' W".4 .#4. i- ,', Margarita Community Park011111110%'to,,„„4, Calle Aragon -Park 44‘11.46t.‘ Meado s Park •1 lea Ranald Reagan Sports Park►' '* Sam Hicks Monument -Parks Town Squarer Ary • ,/ isAGIL S wirootrA.4 auba-Ridge Park 811)1 ge 14, .4 S Crowne Hili Park utterfildS age Park halo Rotary Park -� l 6500 Paloma-del'Sol Park ay" Ars or, Vail'Ranch Park intit PabloiApis Park.. ent Hine ergar tMemvrial= Park Wolf 'Creek-41-rawl ,Paric ivrt. 1111, Wolf Creek(Park Loma Linda;Park "\;:\,.",Pa es Gallante Park /4\, 7 N. 6r( \\"-yx soy organ, ill Park 13000 19500 ft. Map center: 6294722, 2125844 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Legend D City Highways Streets2 • Parks dlk 1, Scale: 1:64,916 ('111,1;1'11 i)1 TEMECULA '11141'E :uitisnis . '1, i q'purlaui k' 0 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair 1200 2400 3600 ft. Map center: 6296506, 2116326 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Legend City Aerial 2012 Transparent Streets Parks Scale: 1:11,977 11 TEMECULA 11,1 'k r,uiil wn,., 1r•r, t,pportunitin, 0 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair 1200 2400 3600 ft. Map center: 6288513, 2130602 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Legend City Aerial 2012 Transparent Streets up Parks Scale: 1:11,977 THE C1"1" TEMECULA 1..114 Hilo.. Wuntusit 0 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair 00EYDR .0 sew 1. ‘Gtoc'cts1 c°‘ *fg Ei-AWNCRESTCR 1200 2400 3600 ft. Map center: 6289098, 2136190 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. Legend o City Aerial 2012 Transparent Streets as Parks Scale: 1:11,977 Item No. 9 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance No. 15-03 Amending of Section 8.12.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code Concerning the Recovery of Abatement Expenses in Public Nuisance Actions (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 15-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 8.12.140 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE RECOVERY OF ABATEMENT EXPENSES IN PUBLIC NUISANCE ACTIONS BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present. Ordinance No. 15-03 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of March 24, 2015. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 15-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 8.12.140 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE RECOVERY OF ABATEMENT EXPENSES IN PUBLIC NUISANCE ACTIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment. Section 8.12.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.12.140 Nuisances Recovery of abatement expenses. A. Whenever any person creating, causing, committing, or maintaining a public nuisance, as referred to in Section 8.12.140, or other public nuisance, as defined under state law or other ordinances or regulations, has been given notice, by or on behalf of the city attorney or by any other city officer, employee or policing agent authorized to give such notice, to abate such nuisance or cease and desist from continuing such nuisance or violation of law, and such person fails, refuses or neglects to comply with the notice within the time specified therein, or if such a time is not specified, then within a time reasonably sufficient to enable such compliance, such noncomplying person shall be liable to the city for any and all costs and expenses to the city involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with or enforcing the law as referred to or encompassed within said notice. B. Costs and expenses, as referred to in subsection A. of this section, may include, but are not limited to, any and all direct costs and expenses related to such things as personnel salaries and benefits, operational overhead, rent, interest, fees for experts or consultants, or claims against the city arising as a consequence of the nuisance or violation, and procedures associated with collecting moneys due hereunder. Additionally, in any legal action, administrative proceeding, or special proceeding to abate a nuisance, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recovery of attorneys' fees. The recovery of attorneys' fees by the prevailing party shall be limited to those individual actions or proceedings in which the City elects, at the initiation of that individual action or proceeding, to seek recovery of its own attorneys' fees. In no action, administrative proceeding, or special proceeding shall an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing party exceed the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the City in the action or proceeding. C. The provisions of subsection A of this section shall also apply to any person who received a notice, as specified therein, abated the nuisance or violation, but subsequently allowed or was responsible for a recurrence of the nuisance or violation. D. The liability of any person for the payment of the costs and expenses provided for in subsection A of this section may be waived in whole or in part by the city attorney in any case where he or she determines, in his or her sole discretion, that the failure or refusal of such persons to comply with the notice therein involved was based upon a good faith and bona fide issue of law or fact specially involved in the circumstances of the case. Any determination or decision of the city attorney in this regard shall be final and conclusive and shall not be subject to appeal as prescribed in Chapter 2.04. E. Money due to the city pursuant to this section may be recovered in an appropriate civil action. Alternatively, such liability may be enforced by special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed, which proceedings may be conducted in a manner substantively similar to proceedings described in Sections 39574 et seq. of the California Government Code relating to weed abatement assessments. Section 2. Findings. In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The amendment to Temecula Municipal Code Section 8.12.140 by this Ordinance is declaratory of existing law. B. Government Code Section 38773.5 requires that in all city nuisance abatement actions the "prevailing party" shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees even if the ordinance limits recovery of attorney fees to the city and further provides that ordinances providing for nuisance abatement shall state that the prevailing party may be entitled to recovery of reasonable attorneys fees in any such abatement action. C. This provision is similar to Civil Code Section 1717 that provides that even if a contract provides for the payment of attorneys fees to a particular party to the contract, the court will award attorney fees to the prevailing party in a legal action involving the contract. D. Section 8.12.140 is construed as providing for the award of attorney fees in a legal action, administrative proceeding, or special proceeding for nuisance abatement to the prevailing party and not just to the City. The wording of the section should, however, be amended to specifically state this construction of Section 8.12.140 in order to prevent confusion and provide for a clear statement of the law. Section 3. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 1, Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 15-03 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of March, 2015, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of April, 2015, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 10 ACTION MINUTES March 24, 2015 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District Meeting convened at 7:51 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: President Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Rahn, Edwards CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS (None) CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC 11 Approve the Action Minutes of March 10, 2015 - Approved Staff Recommendation (3- 0-1, Director Comerchero abstained) Director Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Director Rahn; and electronic vote reflected approval by Directors Naggar, Rahn and Edwards with Director Comerchero abstaining. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of March 10, 2015. CSD BUSINESS 12 Consider Appointment of President as a Result of the Appointment of Former President Chuck Washington to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors - Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0) Director Naggar made the motion to appoint Director Edwards as President and Director Comerchero as Vice President; it was seconded by Director Rahn; and electronic vote reflected approval by Directors Comerchero, Naggar, Rahn and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the Board of Directors appoint a member to serve as Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) President for the remainder of the 2015 year. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD Action Minutes 032415 1 CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:58 P.M., the Community Services District was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 14, 2015, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk/Secretary [SEAL] CSD Action Minutes 032415 2 Item No. 11 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Margarita Officials Association for Sports Officiating Services PREPARED BY: Julie Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve a five-year agreement with Margarita Officials Association, in the amount of $50,000 per year, for adult softball league and tournament officiating services. BACKGROUND: The Community Services Department successfully offers a year- round adult softball league and tournaments as part of the City's sponsored sports programs. This extremely popular sports program attracts adults of all ages, including co-ed teams and active senior citizens desiring to participate in league play. Annually, the program attracts over 250 teams playing in over 1,200 games. Margarita Officials Association has over forty-five years of professional experience in providing quality and dedicated officiating services throughout southern California. In addition, they have a proven record in providing superior officiating support and customer service to the City of Temecula for many years. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the Temecula Community Services District's Fiscal Year 2014-15 budget. Program participants pay a per season registration fee which offsets officiating costs. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 14, 2015, between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Margarita Officials Association, a Non-profit, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 15, 2015 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2020, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($50,000.00) annually, for a total Agreement amount of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($250,000.00). b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the Executive Director. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by Executive Director and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the Executive Director or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effective date. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the Executive Director or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: To Consultant: 14. ASSIGNMENT City of Temecula Attn: Executive Director 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Margarita Officials Association Attn: Bill Plante P.O. Box 504286 San Diego, CA 92150-4286 The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The Executive Director is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION DISTRICT (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Maryann Edwards, TCSD Chair Bill Plante, Executive Director ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, City Kenneth Mosley, Financial Director Clerk/Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City CONSULTANT Attorney/General Counsel Margarita Officials Association Attn: Bill Plante P.O. Box 504286 San Diego, CA 92150-4286 (858) 243-4145 plantebill@cox.net Acting PM Initials: Date: EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: 1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ASSOCIATION. The Association shall be responsible for assigning Experienced and Qualified Officials for all scheduled TCSD adult slow pitch softball league games and tournaments, on an as needed basis, for the City of Temecula Community Services District at various District park facilities: a. "Qualified Officials" are those softball officials who (i) are registered umpires with Amateur Softball Association; and (ii) maintain general liability insurance with a qualified and reputable insurer of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, death and property damage naming the District and the City of Temecula as additional insureds; b. Provide appropriate scheduling and supervision for softball officials at all District leagues and tournaments; c. Require all officials to purchase, maintain in good order and wear while officiating Temecula league and tournament games, the prescribed uniform and equipment to fulfill the terms of the contract. d. Conduct on-site evaluations of officials to insure appropriate service and performance levels are maintained. Will periodically provide the Recreation Supervisor copies of evaluations. e. Provide, at no additional cost to the District, representatives to attend any league organizational meeting as deemed necessary by the Recreation Supervisor, when sufficient notice of meeting is given. f. Association shall be responsible for providing, maintaining, and repairing the equipment, materials, supplies, and similar items, necessary for the proper conduct of the officiating to be performed. g. Within five business days of the date of this Agreement, Association shall provide TCSD with a list of the Qualified Officials it will draw from in making assignments and a certificate of insurance from each such official to be approved by the Director of Community Services and Association shall update the list and the certificate of insurance each time a new official is added; h. Should an official, for any reason within his/her control, cause a game to be protested, the Association shall submit a verbal report to the District of the circumstances on the following day and a written report shall be provided, if required, within five (5) days. Officials shall be provided by the Association, at no cost to the District for any rescheduled game resulting from a protest that is upheld. i. Association shall assist the District in handling protests including, but not limited to, representing the official(s) at protest meetings, as required; j. When a grievance has been filed with Association, the Association shall notify the District in writing not more than five (5) days after the grievance is filed with the Association and provide a copy of the grievance. 2. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DISTRICT. a. The District has the right to refuse the services of any Association official, with or without cause, provided the District notifies the Association of its decision and Association shall not assign any such official to District games; b. The District shall provide fields in playable condition and set up necessary equipment for games. c. The District is to provide the Association with a copy of all by-laws and rules unique to the conduct of their games. d. The District shall schedule all games as to the time and location. A complete schedule of games shall be furnished to the Association in sufficient time as to allow for scheduling of officials. When a game is rescheduled or canceled after notification, the Association shall be apprised at least three (3) hours in advance. If this time frame is not met, the District shall pay all fees due as if the game was played. e. Officials shall appear at the game site at least fifteen (15) minutes prior to the scheduled starting time. Should officials fail to appear for a game, when properly notified, the Association shall forfeit the fee in the amount as if the game were played for each official who did not show. Games not played due to the nonappearance of one or both scheduled teams, inclement weather, or other misfortune will be paid for by District at the rate as if the game were played per official, provided an official(s) is present. Should a game in progress be canceled or terminated for any reason, the District shall pay all fees due as if the game was played. EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule FEES FOR GAMES AND TOURNAMENTS Slow Pitch Softball Officiating Fee (1 Umpire/game) • FY 2015/16 - $37.00/game • FY 2016/17 - $37.00/game • FY 2017/18 - $37.00/game • FY 2018/19 - $38.00/game • FY 2019/20 - $38.00/game Item No. 12 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Sherry Berry Music for Concession Services PREPARED BY: Erica Russo, Management Analyst! RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Sherry Berry Music to extend the term to April 1, 2016, and to amend Payment Section 7 to maintain continuity for providing concession services at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. BACKGROUND: Sherry Berry Music has been providing concession services at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater since December 2007. On May 24, 2011, Sherry Berry Music entered into an agreement to continue providing concession services which includes the sale of high quality food, beverages, and alcoholic beverages. The term of the First Amendment ended on April 1, 2014, and was extended one-year to April 1, 2015 as two one- year extensions were pre -authorized in the Amendment. Sherry Williams, owner of Sherry Berry Music, has abided by all terms and conditions within the agreement and continues to provide excellent service to over 63,000 Theater patrons annually. Staff recommends exercising the option to renew this agreement for one additional year as per Section 6. The Theater is in the midst of a six month rehabilitation which necessitated the complete closure of the facility. In order to insure the City's ability to provide concessionaire sales immediately upon completion of the project, with the appropriate catering and ABC licenses along with the ability to assist with booking performers into the Merc, the City will make a one-time payment to the Concessionaire in the amount of $30,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Community Services Fiscal Year 2014-15 expenditure budget for this additional $30,000 expense. Revenues to the City from the operations of the concession services during this truncated season are estimated at $1,000 which has been programed into the Community Services Fiscal Year 2015-16 revenue budget. ATTACHMENTS: Second Amendment SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND SHERRY BERRY MUSIC FOR THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA COMMUNITY THEATER THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 14, 2015 by and between the City of Temecula, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Sherry Berry Music, a General Partnership, (hereinafter referred to as "Concessionaire"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On May 24, 2011 the City and Concessionaire entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Food, Beverage and Alcoholic Beverage Sales," to provide concession services. b. On March 25, 2014 the City and Concessionaire entered into the Second Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Food, Beverage and Alcoholic Beverage Sales," to extend the term of the agreement to April 1, 2015, and to amend the "Notices" section. c. The parties now desire to extend the term of the agreement to April 1, 2016, increase the payment in the amount of $30,000, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. follows 2. Section 6 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than April 1, 2016 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 7 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Concessionaire a one-time payment, in accordance with and as described in Attachment A. The Second Amendment amount shall not exceed Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($30,000.00) as described in Attachment A for a total Agreement amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($30,000.00). 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES SHERRY BERRY MUSIC, a General Partnership DISTRICT (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Maryann Edwards, Chair ATTEST: By: By: Sherry Williams, Partner Randi Johl-Olson, City Frank R. Fletcher, Partner Clerk/Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City CONCESSIONAIRE Attorney/General Counsel Sherry Berry Music Attn: Sherry Williams 45600 Corte Royal Temecula, CA 92592 sherrywi II iamsm usi cCverizon.net 2 Acting PM Initials: Date: ATTACHMENT A Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the additional scope of work and associated cost as provided by the Concessionaire. "The City will be renovating the Theater from March 2015 to September 2015 during which time it will be closed for performances and special events. In order to mitigate the impact to concessionaire sales caused by the closure of the Theater for period of renovation and in order to continue the business relationship with the City, the City will make a one-time payment to the Concessionaire in the amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($30,000). 3 Item No. 13 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval to Utilize Staff Support for West Coast Premiere Screening Event for Film Featuring Retired USMC Corporal Juan E. Dominguez in Temecula (At the Request of TCSD President Edwards) PREPARED BY: Bea Barnett, Theater Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the utilization of staff for the planning and execution of the west coast film premiere in Retired USMC Corporal Juan E. Dominguez' (Purple Heart) hometown in the August —September time frame. BACKGROUND: Temecula has a long-standing commitment to serving and honoring its veterans. We have been able to work closely with the Tunnel To Towers and The Gary Sinise Foundation to host two major concerts (2012 & 2013) in Temecula's Town Square raising funds for wounded warriors including building a smart home right here in Temecula for Purple Heart Awardee, Cpl. Juan E. Dominguez, USMC (Ret.). There is now another opportunity to support and share veteran voices and spirits through art with the "You. Are. Beautiful. A Tribute To Warriors." photography series which showcases the human side of veterans that have physical wounds and invisible ones. The producer began this project in 2012, and has presented multiple exhibitions and events in Boston and surrounding areas. A new feature length documentary titled, "Darkness and Light: a Human Conversation with Eleven Wounded Veterans," highlights an important issue that we face in our nation, and that is roughly twenty two veterans commit suicide a day. Their fight continues beyond the battlefield into everyday life. This film serves as an inspiration to all who have served our country (especially those who were physically impacted by their service) and their families. The mission of this passion project is to spread love and kindness and through the artwork, honor those who have served, empower veterans through art, and share veterans' voices to help and inspire others. The proposed target date for this event is sometime in August 2015, however, producers are open and flexible to other dates. The producer has requested assistance for procuring either private or public facilities for the screening of this premiere event. The Old Town Temecula Community Theater and Conference Center do have availability on Wednesday, September 30, 2015. This event would draw worldwide and favorable attention for Temecula. Major stakeholders will be contacted and engaged for a red carpet event, reception, and film screening premiere in Temecula. This fundraising event for veterans will benefit multiple charities helping wounded warriors such as the Semper Fi Fund and other local organizations. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff time will be absorbed in TCSD's existing budget and coordinated through co-sponsored events. The producer will also assist with sponsor solicitations to offset expenses so that the maximum amount of revenue raised goes to charities ATTACHMENTS: Link to Documentary Promotional Trailer: https://vimeo.com/ondemand/DarknessAndLight COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Item No. 14 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve a Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plans, and the Fiscal Year 2015-16 CDBG Annual Action Plan and Funding Recommendations PREPARED BY: Dana Weaver, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 AND FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ANNUAL ACTION PLANS 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2015-2016 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BACKGROUND: Each year the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides funds to local jurisdictions through the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG). CDBG funds are used to benefit low- and moderate -income residents through the funding of non-profit public service programs and capital improvement projects that create decent housing, establish a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities. On June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 requesting HUD designate the City of Temecula as an Entitlement City. To obtain entitlement status, HUD required the City to develop and submit a Five -Year Consolidated Plan. On April 10, 2012, the City Council adopted the City's first Five -Year Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Resolution No. 12-30), authorizing the City to become a direct recipient of CDBG funds from HUD, and identifying priorities for the use of CDBG funding through 2016-17. The Consolidated Plan consists of various components that assess the City's current housing market, analyze demographic, ethnic, and socio-economic conditions, and identify populations within the City who have the greatest community and housing needs, including seniors, families, persons who are homeless or at -risk of homelessness, and persons with disabilities. It also defines the City's priority needs, objectives, and strategies for reducing the most prevalent barriers to housing and services in our community. The City's Five -Year Consolidated Plan identifies the following priority objectives for allocating CDBG funds: • Promote, preserve, and assist in the development of affordable housing for low and moderate income residents, special needs groups, those at -risk of homelessness, and disproportionately impacted residents. • Improve and expand infrastructure and facilities that benefit low- and moderate -income neighborhoods and residents. • Provide and improve access to public services for low- and moderate -income persons and those with special needs. • Provide for the economic development needs of low- and moderate -income persons and neighborhood target areas. As an Entitlement Community, the City is required to prepare a one-year Action Plan to notify citizens and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) of the City's intended actions during a particular fiscal year. It is designed to be a collaborative process whereby community input is gathered and utilized to establish effective funding recommendations that respond to the needs of the community. The Annual Action Plan (AAP) serves as a guide on how the City intends to utilize the allotted federal funds to address priority objectives in a manner that will produce the greatest measurable impact on the local community. The AAP emphasizes funding for feasible activities that constitute clear strategies for achieving quantified outcomes for decent housing, continuum of care, suitable living environment, and economic opportunity objectives. The City held two CDBG workshops at the Conference Center, one on November 10, 2014 and the other on November 17, 2014. Outreach allowed for community and citizen participation and feedback regarding annual CDBG funding, and providing technical assistance to potential applicants. In Fiscal Year 2013-14, in response to HUDs first program performance evaluation, staff recommended strategies to improve the City's funding of housing activities and ability to report measurable outcomes against the City's five year decent housing goals. The City's efforts were recognized in HUD's second year evaluation of Temecula's program, thus improving the City's program rating from needs improvement to satisfactory. The fourth program year AAP continues to improve and expand the CDBG Program by funding a variety of community improvements and public services. FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 FUNDING SUMMARY For Fiscal Year 2015-16, the City of Temecula anticipates receiving $540,214 through the Federal CDBG program. The 2015-16 program year will be the fourth year Temecula receives CDBG funds directly as an entitlement community. Additionally, the City has a remaining balance of $160,561 from Fiscal Year 2012-13 ($150,280) and Fiscal Year 2013-14 ($10,281) of unused funds that will be redirected to various projects/programs included in the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Annual Action Plan. This action constitutes the processing of a Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 CDBG Annual Action Plans in order to give the public an opportunity to comment independently of the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Annual Action Plan. In accordance with the City of Temecula CDBG Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) and Federal CDBG regulations, the City must process a formal Substantial Amendment whenever a project budget increases by 25 percent, the scope of an activity significantly changes, a project is cancelled, and/or funds are reallocated to other Consolidated Plan activities of equal or lesser priority. The Finance Subcommittee, composed of Mayor Pro Tem Chuck Washington and Council Member Mike Naggar, met on January 27, 2015 to consider the CDBG Fiscal Year 2015-16 funding proposals and allocations. Subsequent to the Subcommittee meeting, the City received the formal annual CDBG allocation letter from HUD on February 18, 2015. The total Fiscal Year 2015-16 CDBG grant allocation for Temecula is $540,214, which is $3,856 less than estimated at the meeting in January. Staff adjusted for the difference by evenly reducing all projects/services recommended for approval by the Subcommittee. In order for the City to meet HUD's national objectives for CDBG, and apply funding to the City's highest priorities, the Subcommittee members recommended a maximum of 20 percent be allocated for program administration ($108,042) and a maximum of 15 percent be allocated to ten public service program providers ($81,032). The public service dollars would be evenly divided between nine of the ten selected, each receiving $7,892, with the exception of the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County receiving a $10,000 award. The Fair Housing Council conducts mandatory fair housing discrimination and landlord/tenant services, and thus, typically receives a reasonable percentage of the annual allocation to provide those mandatory services to Temecula residents. The public service program funding recommendations are as follows: • Assistance League of Temecula Valley (Operation School Bell) • Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County (Before and After School Care for Kids) • Community Mission of Hope (Inclement Weather Shelter) • City of Temecula (Just Add One) • Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (Fair Housing Services) • Safe Alternatives for Everyone, Inc. (SAFE) (Domestic Violence Services) • Senior Citizens Service Center (Emergency Food/Assistance for Needy Families) • Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF) (Childcare and Adult Education) • Temecula Community Pantry (Food Pantry) • VNW Circle of Care (Food Ministry) The remaining $351,140 would be allocated to the Old Town Sidewalks Improvement Project, a five-year CDBG priority project. The project includes the design and construction of two segments of sidewalk located in the Old Town area. The improvement areas identified are located as follows: (1) east side of Old Town Front Street between the north end of Moreno Road and the US Post Office located just north of the south end of Moreno Road, and (2) the south side of Fifth Street between Mercedes Street and Old Town Front Street. Lastly, the Subcommittee recommended that the $160,561 of unused CDBG funds from previous fiscal years be redirected to feasible projects that can expend these funds in accordance with CDBG law regulating the timely expenditure of CDBG funds. A total of $122,338 of the $160,561 of unused funds will be redirected to close the funding gap for the completion of Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement project currently underway, $12,000 will be redirected to the Solar Affordable Home Program administered by GRID Alternatives, and $26,223 will be redirected to the Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program administered by Habitat for Humanity. A funding summary is provided below. Fiscal Year 2015-16 CDBG Funding Recommendation Summary (Inclusive of Substantial Amendment) Amount Public Service Programs (15%) $ 81,032 Planning/Program Administration (20%) $ 108,042 Old Town Sidewalks Improvement Project $ 351,140 Subtotal (Fiscal Year 2015-16 Allocation) $ 540,214 Sam Hicks Monument Park Rehabilitation Project $ 122,338 Habitat for Humanity—Home Rehab Program $ 26,223 Grid Alternatives—Solar Affordable Program $ 12,000 Subtotal (Substantial Amendment Funding Reallocations) $ 160,561 Total $ 700,775 In the event that the City's allocation is reduced or increased, contingency provisions can be found on page 37 of the Annual Action Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: The timely submittal of the Substantial Amendment and Annual Action Plan to HUD enables the City to become eligible to receive and distribute approximately $700,775 in entitlement funds for Fiscal Year 2015-16. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fiscal Year 2015-16 CDBG Funding Recommendations Summary (Inclusive of Substantial Amendment) 2. Resolution —Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012- 13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 CDBG Annual Action Plan Exhibit A —Substantial Amendment 3. Resolution —Fiscal Year 2015-16 CDBG Annual Action Plan Exhibit A —Annual Action Plan CITY OF TEMECULA FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (Inclusive of Substantial Amendment) CDBG FY 2015-16 GRAND TOTAL Amount Recommended byAmount Subcommittee Adjusted (Reduced Allocation) PUBLIC SERVICES Assistance League of Temecula Valley O eration School Bell p $ 7,956 7,892 $ ' Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County Before and After School Care $ 7,956 7,892 $ ' Community Mission of Hope Inclement Weather Shelter $ 7,956 7,892 $ ' City of Temecula Just Add One 7,956 7,892 ' Fair Housing Council of Riverside County Fair HousingServices $ 10,000 10,000 $ ' Safe Alternatives for Everyone (SAFE) Domestic Violence Services $ 7,956 7,892 $ ' Senior Citizens Service Center Emer Food Distribution enc g Y $ 7,956 7,892 $ ' Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF)Childcare and Adult Education $ 7,956 7,892 $ ' Temecula Community Pantry Food Pantry 7,956 7,892 VNW Circle of Care Food Ministry 7,956 7,892 TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES $ 81,610 $ 81,032 PUBLIC FACILITIES Old Town Sidewalks Improvement Project $353,646 $351,140 Sam Hicks Park Playground Replacement $122,338 $122,338 TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES $475,984 $473,478 HOUSING ACTIVITIES Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repair p $ 26,223 26,223 $ ' GRID Alternative Solar Affordable HousingProgram g $ 12,000 12,000 $ ' TOTAL HOUSING ACTIVITIES $ 38,223 $ 38,223 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION $108,814 $108,042 GRAND TOTAL $704,631 $700,775 RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 AND FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ANNUAL ACTION PLANS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula has participated directly within the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds since July 1, 2012; B. The City of Temecula has prepared all documents, notices, and forms required by HUD for participation in the CDBG Program by entitlement jurisdictions; C. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 on June 14, 2011 initiating the City to obtain entitlement community status from HUD, and authorized the Director of Community Development to prepare and return for City Council approval all documents required for the designation as an Entitlement City, including the Five -Year Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, the Citizen Participation Plan, and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing; D. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-78 on November 1, 2011, approving the Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of its Five -Year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds; E. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 12-30 on April 10, 2012, approving the 2012-16 Five -Year Consolidated Plan, that contains a housing community development needs assessment, a survey of available resources, and a five-year strategy for achieving housing and community development goals, as well as the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing which outlines the City of Temecula's strategy to affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity and remove impediments to fair housing choice; F. The City of Temecula has prepared Annual Action Plans to implement the first and second year of the five year strategy of the 2012-16 Five -Year Consolidated Plan to HUD on May 15, 2012, and May 15, 2013; G. The 2012-13 and 2013-14 Annual Action Plans established programs in compliance with HUD CDBG entitlement funding allocations; H. The City incorporated various changes to the Annual Action Plans as adopted on April 10, 2012, and on April 23, 2013, and Substantial Amendment adopted April 14, 2015, in the form of eliminating some of the programs/projects originally included in the 2012-13 and 2013-14 Annual Action Plans, reallocating those funds to other program/projects; I. The Substantial Amendment to the 2012-13 and 2013-14 Annual Action Plans was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by Federal, State, and local law; J. At the conclusion of the Finance Subcommittee meeting and after due consideration of the testimony, the Finance Subcommittee provided funding recommendations for the Substantial Amendment to the 2012-13 and 2013-14 Annual Action Plans on January 27, 2015; K. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Substantial Amendment to the 2012-13 and 2013-14 Annual Action Plans on April 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. L. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council approved the Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 Annual Action Plans, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. M. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the Substantial Amendment hereby finds, determines and declares that: N. Pursuant to Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Part 91.505, a grantee shall amend its approved Plan whenever it makes a change in its allocations priorities or change in the method of distribution of funds, carries out an activity using funds from a program covered in the Consolidated Plan, not previously described in the Action plan, or changes the purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of an activity. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed action on the Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 Annual Action Plans is exempt from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pursuant to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and specifically 24 CFR 58.34(a)(1) because the Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 Annual Action Plans is a resource identification study and the development of plans and strategies for the prioritization and funding of proposed programs through CDBG and the proposed action involves the feasibility and planning studies to determine prioritization and CDBG funding to begin the development of certain projects. The potential projects discussed in the proposed actions that might involve physical activity will be reviewed under NEPA or the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the development of those projects. The proposed action is also exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 and 15378(b)(4). Section 4. Approvals. O. The City Council hereby approves the Substantial Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013-14 Annual Action Plans, set forth as Exhibit A attached hereto, and any and all other documents deemed necessary by HUD to reprogram the $160,561 allocation of Federal CDBG funds and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or his designee, to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the execution of these documents, including, but not limited to serving as the Certifying Officer for all environmental review procedures associated with the various CDBG projects, and Certifying Officer for the purpose of signing correspondence, agreements, and other required documents. P. The City Council hereby approves the reprogram of unexpended CDBG Entitlement funds in the amount of $160,561; the allocation of Fiscal Year 2012-13 CDBG funds of $122,338 to the Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement Project; the allocation of Fiscal Year 2012-13 CDBG funds of $12,000 to the Solar Affordable Home Program; the allocation of Fiscal Year 2012-13 and Fiscal Year 2013- 2014 CDBG funds of $26,223 to the Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program; Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 1, Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Community Development Block Grant Program SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT Program Year 1: 2012-2013 And Program Year 2: 2013-2014 Submitted to: US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Community Planning and Development Los Angeles Field Office 611 West 6th Street, Suite 801 Los Angeles, CA90017 Prepared by: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 May 2015 33 l-6ot of Scmhorn C*b6 'lit Wine Country Table of Contents Summary Substantial Amendment Narrative Appendix A: Summaries of Reallocated/Reprogrammed Funds by Project 3 Appendix B: Stakeholder Consultation and Citizen Participation 3 Summary The City of Temecula currently receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding as an entitlement community from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The upcoming Program Year 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan (Program Year 4) was approved by the Temecula City Council at a Public Hearing on April 14, 2015, and subsequently submitted to HUD on May 15, 2014. This document, consisting of a narrative as well as required attachments, constitutes the formal Substantial Amendment to HUD. Substantial Amendment Narrative The 2012-13 Fiscal Year was the City's first year participating as an Entitlement Community within the CDBG Program. This, in conjunction with other project specific factors, has resulted in some delay in set-up and commencement of some of the 2012-13 and 2013-14 programs/projects which were allocated funding. Consequently, the City will also be processing a formal Substantial Amendment to HUD to reallocate/re-program funds from various projects/programs included in the respective Annual Action Plans into projects/programs included in the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan. Project/Program Description Transitional/ Supportive Housing Facility Original CDBG Funding Amount ($) $150,000 Recommended Re -Programmed Amount ($) $150,000 Substantial Amendment Recommendation City anticipated acquiring an existing private multi -family site through partnership during Fiscal Year 2012-13 (Program Year 1), and budgeted for this housing facility project as part of the FY2012-13 Action Plan. However, as of February 2015, partnership for acquisition has not occurred. The City conducted extensive research regarding the feasibility of completing a transitional/supportive housing facility as planned. The proposed project is not expected to be able to be completed within the upcoming year. Recommendation is to re -program (1) $122,338 of the Transitional/Supportive Housing Facility Project budget into the Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement Project to close the funding gap; (2) $12,000 into the Solar Affordable Home Program administrated by GRID Alternatives; and (3) $15,662 into the Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, all capital improvement projects included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Action Plan. Public Services: Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission (TMRM) Food Distribution Program Public Services: Miscellaneous $10,190 $128,333 Planning & Administration: (Fair Housing Services) Total $198,550 $487,073 $10,190 $277 $94 $160,561 Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission experienced some administration changes and was not able to complete the requirements required to receive CDBG funds. As a result, the CDBG public service activity was canceled, and not all funds were used during implementation of the FY2013-14 Action Plan. Recommendation is to re -program unused/remaining balance of FY2013- 14 public service program funds into Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, and included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Action Plan. Not all funds were used during implementation of the FY2012-13 and FY2013-14 Action Plans. Recommendation is to re -program unused/remaining balance of public service program funds into Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Annual Action. Not all funds were used during implementation of the FY2012-13 and FY2013-14 Action Plans. Recommendation is to re -program unused/remaining balance of administration program funds into Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Annual Action. Appendix A: Summaries of ReallocaiedlReammed Funds by Project In total, $160,561 from Program Years 2012-13 ($150,280) and 2013-14 ($10,281) remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/program (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed into three capital projects included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Annual Action Plan. 1. Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement Project: A total of $122,338 from Program Year 2012-13 remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/programs (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed to this park improvement project. 2. Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program: A total of $26,223 from Program Year 2012-13 and Program Year 2013-14 remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/programs (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed to this housing improvement program. 3. Solar Affordable Home Program: A total of $12,000 from Program Year 2012-13 remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/programs (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed to this housing improvement program. iAppendixB: Stakeholder Consultation and Citizen P rti Natio n The proposed reallocation/reprogramming recommendations included within the Substantial Amendment were presented before the Temecula City Council for approval during the April 14, 2015 Public Hearing. The Substantial Amendment, as presented, was approved by City Council. There were no comments received during the 30 -day comment period from March 12, 2015 through April 11, 2015. RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2015-2016 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula has participated directly within the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds since July 1, 2012; B. The City of Temecula has prepared all documents, notices, and forms required by HUD for participation in the CDBG Program by entitlement jurisdictions; C. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 on June 14, 2011 initiating the City to obtain entitlement community status from HUD, and authorized the Director of Community Development to prepare and return for City Council approval all documents required for the designation as an Entitlement City, including the Five -Year Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, the Citizen Participation Plan, and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing; D. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-78 on November 1, 2011, approving the Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of its Five -Year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds; E. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 12-30 on April 10, 2012, approving the 2012-16 Five -Year Consolidated Plan, that contains a housing community development needs assessment, a survey of available resources, and a five-year strategy for achieving housing and community development goals, as well as the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing which outlines the City of Temecula's strategy to affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity and remove impediments to fair housing choice; F. The City of Temecula has prepared an Annual Action Plan to implement the fourth year of the Five -Year Consolidated Plan; G. The Annual Action Plan includes HUD entitlement funding and the proposed use of Federal CDBG funds for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2015-16; H. The 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by Federal, State, and local law; I. At the conclusion of the Finance Subcommittee meeting and after due consideration of the testimony, the Finance Subcommittee provided funding recommendations for the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan on January 27, 2015; J. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan on April 14, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. K. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council approved the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. L. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that: M. Pursuant to Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Part 91 Consolidated Submissions For Community Planning And Development Programs (24 CFR Part 91) each entitlement jurisdiction must adopt a Five-year Consolidated Plan that states its overall plan to develop a viable urban community by providing for decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate -income persons, and prepare an Annual Action Plan each year describing the activities the jurisdiction will undertake during the next year to address those five-year priority needs and objectives; N. The City Council must adopt a plan that serves the following functions: 1. A planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders; 2. A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for jurisdictions; 3. A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and 4.A management tool for assessing performance and tracking results. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed action on the Annual Action Plan (2015-2016) is exempt from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pursuant to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and specifically 24 CFR 58.34(a)(1) because the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan is a resource identification study and the development of plans and strategies for the prioritization and funding of proposed programs through CDBG and the proposed action involves the feasibility and planning studies to determine prioritization and CDBG funding to begin the development of certain projects. The potential projects discussed in the proposed actions that might involve physical activity will be reviewed under NEPA or the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the development of those projects. The proposed action is also exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 and 15378(b)(4). Section 4. Approvals. O. The City Council hereby approves the Annual Action Plan (2015-2016), set forth as Exhibit A attached hereto, and any and all other documents deemed necessary by HUD to obtain the annual CDBG allocation of the federal CDBG funds and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or his designee, to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the execution of these documents, including, but not limited to serving as the Certifying Officer for all environmental review procedures associated with the various CDBG projects, and Certifying Officer for the purpose of signing correspondence, agreements, and other required documents. P. The City Council hereby approves an application for CDBG Entitlement funds in the amount of $540,214; the allocation of the CDBG current year program administration of $108,042; the allocation of the CDBG current year program activities of $432,172; Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of April, 2015. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 1, Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of April, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk City of Temecula Community Development Block Grant Program Annual Action Plan (Inclusive of Substantial Amendment) Program Year 4: 2015-2016 Submitted to: US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Community Planning and Development Los Angeles Field Office 611 West 6th Street, Suite 801 Los Angeles, CA90017 Prepared by: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 May 2015 Win• Country Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 The Consolidated Plan 1 The Community Development Block Grant Program 1 II. Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 3 Executive Summary 91.220 (b) 3 Citizen Participation 91.220 and 91.220 (b) 9 Resources 91.220 (c) (1) and (c) (2) 12 Annual Objectives 91.220 (c) (3) 14 Description of Activities 91.220 (d) and (e) 15 Geographic Distribution / Allocation Priorities 91.220 (d) and (fl 25 Annual Affordable Housing Goals 91.220 (g) 27 Public Housing 91.220 (h) 27 Homeless and Special Needs 91.220 (1) 28 Barriers to Affordable Housing 91.220 (j) 31 Other Actions 91.220 (k) 32 111. Program Specific Requirements 36 CDBG 91.220 (I) (1) 36 IV. Other Narratives and Attachments 37 Appendices A. Certifications B. SF 424 Form C. Listing of Proposed Projects (HUD Projects Worksheets) D. Table 36 —Annual E. Proof of Publication F. Resolutions G. City Maps 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 The CPMP Annual Action Plan includes the SF 424 and Narrative Responses to Action Plan questions that CDBG grantees must respond to each year in order to be compliant with the Consolidated Planning Regulations. Narrative Responses The Consolidated Plan Purpose of the Consolidated Plan The City of Temecula Consolidated Plan provides a framework for implementing housing, human services, and community development activities for July 2012 through June 2017. The Plan assists the City by: • Serving as a planning document that the City prepares in partnership with its citizens, community organizations, businesses and other stakeholders • Describing the City's strategic plan for implementing the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) • Measuring performance and tracking goals • Assessing the resources, needs, economic and living conditions, demographics, homelessness, housing costs, etc. of the City of Temecula • Reporting on specific items required by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as a requirement for receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds The Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) National Objectives The Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG) is a federal program that is administered by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). CDBG funds are provided to states and units of local government. As a grantee receiving annual funding allocations from the Federal Government to fund local housing and community development needs, the City of Temecula is authorized to fund eligible activities that meet national and local goals/objectives. The broad national objectives are as follows: • Activities benefiting low/moderate-income (LMI) persons; • Activities which aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; and 1 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA • Activities meeting community development needs that have a particular urgency (urgent need). The 2012-2016 Consolidated Plan directs funds exclusively toward meeting the national objective of benefiting low/moderate-income persons. The Consolidated Plan serves as a comprehensive guide on how the City intends to utilize the allotted federal funds to address national objectives in a manner that will produce the greatest measurable impact on the local community. Performance Measures While the national objectives are broad, measurements used to determine whether activities are successful are more specific. Outcome performance measurement system objectives are as follows: • Provide decent housing • Provide continuum of care • Provide a suitable living environment • Provide economic opportunities At the end of each fiscal year, the City must prepare a Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) to provide information to HUD and Temecula citizens about the year's accomplishments. 2 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Annual Action Plan includes the SF 424 and is due every year no less than 45 days prior to the start of the grantee's program year start date. HUD does not accept plans between August 15 and November 15. Executive Summary 91.220(b) Program Year 4 Each year the City is required to prepare a one year Action Plan to notify citizens and the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) of how the City intends to use the entitlement grant funds it receives from HUD to meet the objectives and strategies identified in the five-year Consolidated Plan. Actions that will be undertaken in the 2015 program year are outlined in this one-year Action Plan, which describes both the allocation of estimated resources and a narrative of what will be done. In a given year, it is possible that no steps will be taken to achieve a particular strategy. Similarly, it is expected that during the course of the year, the City may be presented with unanticipated opportunities that can be capitalized upon to meet goals and strategies. The City shall seize these opportunities to further the goals defined in the Consolidated Plan. The City does not currently participate/receive funds from the HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Program, the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Program, or Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Program. During the 2012-2016 Program Years the City may apply for a Section 108 loan. Should the City elect to do so, and/or participate in the HOME, HOPWA, or ESG programs through the State of California, the Consolidated Plan will be amended through the Substantial Amendment process. One of the major tools for accomplishing the goals of the Consolidated Plan is the annual allocation of CDBG funds provided by HUD. The City received $475,558 in 2012, the City's first year as a direct recipient of CDBG funds. In 2013, the City's CDBG allocation increased by nine percent (9%), from $475,558 to $517,195. In 2014, the City's CDBG allocation increased another five percent (5%), up to $544,070. The City of Temecula will receive $540,214 in CDBG funds for the July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 fiscal year. The 2015 program year will be the fourth year Temecula has received CDBG funds directly, as an entitlement community. The following outlines the total anticipated resources available to implement the 2015 Action Plan. Federal Funding Source Amount CDBG $540,214 Recaptured $0 CDBG Program Income $D ESG so HOME so HOPWA $0 Total CDBG/Federal Resources $540,214 3 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECU For the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year, the estimated CDBG allocation will be used as follows: CDBG Allowable Distribution of Funds Public Services (15% of annual allocation) Planning/Administration (20% of annual allocation) Public Improvements and Housing Total Estimated Funding Amount $81,032 $108,042 $351,140 $540,214 CDBG Funding Program Amounts Amount 2015 CDBG Entitlement Grant $540,214 2015 CDBG Program Income $0 2012 Program Year Carry-over Activities/Funds* $150,280 2013 Program Year Carry-over Activities/Funds* $10,281 Total CDBG Program Resources for 2015 (including carry-over activities from 2012 and 2013 Program Years� $700'775 Amount CDBG Funding Recommendation Summary Public Service Programs $81,032 Planning/Administration $108,042 Sam Hicks Monument Park Rehabilitation Project $122,338 Old Town Sidewalks Improvement Project $351,140 Habitat for Humanity—Home Rehab Program $26,223 Grid Alternatives—Solar Affordable Program $12,000 Total Estimated Funding $700,775 *Estimated $160,561 in carry-over funds from pending activities in 2012 and 2013 will be rolled -over into 2015. The programs, a Transitional/Supportive Housing Facility ($150,000) and the Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission Pantry ($10,100), will not be completed as approved in the 2012 Action Plan and the 2013 Action Plan; therefore, the funds from these activities will be reallocated in 2015. Additionally, there were miscellaneous unused funds allocated for administrative and public service programs ($371) in 2012 and 2013 that will be reallocated in 2015. See "Other Narrative" section of Plan (page 37) for additional detail on Substantial Amendments to the Program Year 1 (2012), and Program Year 2 (2013), Annual Action Plans. The development of the annual Action Plan includes citizen and stakeholder input. This Annual Action Plan is consistent with the top priorities identified by residents and stakeholders who participated in development of the Plan and the 2015-2016 funding process. 4 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA The Community Development Department held two community workshop meetings on November 10, 2014, and November 17, 2014, to collect citizen input regarding community development and housing needs for the City of Temecula. Public meeting attendees prioritized top needs as supportive human services for special needs populations including youth, seniors, domestic violence victims, and the homeless. As described below, the City has prioritized supportive human services and public improvements that benefit low and moderate income neighborhoods and residents (housing, community infrastructure, park playground). In early October 2014, the Community Development Department released a Notice of the Availability of Funds (NOFA) to interested non-profit service providers who could then apply to receive 2015-2016 CDBG program funds. The Community Development Department received 15 applications from public service providers before the application was due on December 12, 2014. The total amount requested was $223,072 for public services and $62,000 for housing improvement programs, demonstrating a tremendous need for CDBG funds in our community. The following organizations submitted CDBG funding applications: 1. Assistance League of Temecula Valley 2. Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County 3. Fair Housing Council of Riverside County 4. Safe Alternatives for Everyone, Inc. (SAFE) 5. Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF) 6. Temecula Community Pantry 7. Community Mission of Hope Pantry 8. Community Mission of Hope Temporary Inclement Weather Shelter 9. VNW Circle of Care 10. Senior Citizens Service Center 11. The Center for Life Change 12. Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center 13. City of Temecula Just Add One 14. Grid Alternatives 15. Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Each application was reviewed for CDBG eligibility, meeting a national objective and conformance to the 2012-2016 Consolidated Plan — Strategic Plan goals. The Community Development Department presented draft funding recommendations to the Finance Committee of the City Council in a public meeting held on January 27, 2015, at the Temecula Civic Center. After review and discussion, the Finance Committee made funding recommendations for the City Council's consideration. The Annual Action Plan reflects the funding recommendations made by the Finance Committee. The City Council approved the Annual Action Plan on April 14, 2015. 5 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA During Fiscal Year 2015-16, CDBG funds will be directed toward accomplishing the following primary goals and performance objectives, as established within the Consolidated Plan: Decent Housing Objective: Promote, preserve, and assist in the development of affordable housing for low and moderate income residents, special needs groups, those at - risk of homelessness, and disproportionately impacted residents. Strategy 1: Participate in available Community Development Programs offered by Riverside County. • Continue to participate and promote the County of Riverside Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program authorizing low- and moderate income first-time home buyers to take a federal income tax credit of up to 15 percent of the annual interest paid on the mortgage. • Continue to support Section 8 rental assistance vouchers to extremely -low and low- income households through the Riverside County Housing Authority Voucher Program. Strategy 2: Encourage local incentives for developers to create affordable housing. • Implement an Affordable Housing Overlay Program approved by the Temecula City Council as part of the 2014-2021 Housing Element. Strategy 3: Affirmatively further fair housing. • Continue to implement recommendations from the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Report completed as part of the 2012-2016 Consolidated Plan. Strategy 4: Preserve the supply of affordable ownership housing stock through rehabilitation. • Allocate $26,223 in CDBG funds to the Habitat for Humanity, Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, for preventative home maintenance and critical home repair services to low-income homeowners. • Allocate $12,000 in CDBG funds to the GRID Alternatives, Solar Affordable Housing Program, for the purchase and installation of photovoltaic solar systems to low- income homeowners. Continuum of Care Objective: Provide programs and services to assist families and persons who are homeless find shelter and access needed services. Strategy 1: Actively support regional and sub -regional efforts to provide a coordinated continuum of housing and services for homeless. 6 15-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA • Continue to be an active member of the Continuum of Care (CoC) for Riverside County and to provide support on efforts such as the ten-year County plan (2007- 2017) to end homelessness. Strategy 2: Work with public, private and non-profit partners to increase funding and leverage resources to prevent homelessness and encourage stability. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Community Mission of Hope, Inclement Weather Shelter Voucher Program, for operations in assisting persons who are homeless with temporary shelter and general human services during the cold winter months. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Senior Citizens Service Center, for the provision of food to LMI families and persons who are homeless. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Temecula Community Pantry, for the provision of food to LMI families and persons who are homeless. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the VNW Circle of Care, Food Ministry Program, for the provision of food to LMI families and persons who are homeless. Suitable Living Environment Objective: Improve and expand infrastructure and facilities that benefit low and moderate income neighborhoods and residents. Strategy 1: Improve conditions in economically challenged neighborhoods and/or for low-income residents • Allocate $351,140 for the design and construction of two new segments of sidewalk in the old Town District. The rehabilitation will provide upgraded infrastructure and improved accessibility for LMI residents in the Pujol Neighborhood and old Town area. • Allocate an additional $122,338 for the design and construction of a new playground structure at Sam Hicks Monument Park. The rehabilitation will provide upgraded play equipment and improved accessibility for LMI residents primarily in the Pujol Neighborhood and old Town area. Objective: Provide and improve access to public services for low and moderate income persons and those with special needs. Strategy 1: Provide support services for special needs populations • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the SAFE, Domestic Violence Services Program, to support a continuum of domestic violence services, including crisis intervention, emergency care, legal assistance, and basic needs assistance. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Assistance League, Operation School Bell Program, to support the distribution of clothing and school supplies to youth in LMI families. 7 2015-2016 _ IT ' OF TE E ULA • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the SMURF Childcare and Adult Education Program to support a continuum of support services to LMI single mothers and children, including training programs on parenting, budgeting, resume and interviewing skills, time management, and self-respect. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County Learning Connection Before and After School Program to provide LMI children with quality to/from school transportation and before and after school care. • Allocate $10,000 CDBG funds to the Fair Housing Council for Riverside County for fair housing outreach and education, and tenant/landlord case dispute services. Economic opportunity Objective: Provide for the economic development needs of low and moderate income persons and neighborhood target areas. Strategy 1: Assist residents with job training and employment needs_ • Continue to promote the City's business technology incubator (Temecula Valley Entrepreneur's Exchange) in its efforts to assist people with initial development of small businesses such as micro -enterprises, thus creating additional jobs. • Support job creation activities through partnership with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce and revitalization activities. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Temecula Just Add One Program to provide LMI youth with quality job training services aimed at decreasing unemployment and empowering youth with skills and experience to succeed in the job market. Administrative Objective: Provide for administration and planning activities to develop housing and community development strategies to carry out actions that address identified needs in the Consolidated Plan. Strategy 1: Program Implementation and planning activities. • Provide $108,042 for general staff administration of CDBG programs and activities, including use of Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS), program set-up, reporting, planning, and subrecipient training and monitoring 8 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Citizen Participation 91.220(b) 1. Provide a summary of the citizen participation and consultation process (including efforts to broaden public participation in the development of the plan. As a prerequisite to submitting the One -Year Action Plan, the City's Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) and CDBG implementing regulation 24 CFR 92.105 require that a public hearing be held to allow citizens and public service agencies an opportunity to express their views concerning the use of CDBG funds. Temecula's year three Action Plan was developed with a strong emphasis on community input. To broaden participation in the Plan, the City provided a number of opportunities for public input including public meetings and a 30 -day draft public comment period. Specifically, ■ The City of Temecula held two community workshop meetings, on November 10, 2014, and November 17, 2014, to collect citizen input regarding community development and housing needs, and to provide assistance to non-profit organizations and government agencies submitting an application requesting CDBG funds from the City of Temecula. One meeting was held in the early evening to accommodate work schedules and one meeting was held during the day to accommodate those uncomfortable driving at night. Notices for the community workshop meetings were publicized on the City's website, emailed to the Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) mailing list and several local business and affordable housing professionals, published in the local newspaper for a 15 -day period, and posted at the Temecula Public Library and Civic Center. • On January 27, 2015, the City of Temecula Finance Committee met to consider the CDBG funding recommendations for Fiscal Year 2015-2016. The City Finance Committee performs in an advisory manner to City staff and to the City Council concerning planning, implementing, and assessing CDBG programs and activities. Notices for this meeting were publicized on the City's website, published in the local newspaper for a 10 -day period, and posted at the Temecula Public Library and Civic Center. • Prior to adoption, the draft Action Plan was made available to the general public for a period of 30 -days in order to provide them with an opportunity to review the recommendation for funding. In compliance with the City's approved Citizen Participation Plan and CDBG implementing regulation 24 CFR 92.105, a public notice was published to solicit comments from interested citizens regarding the City's 2015-2016 One -Year Action Plan. The public hearing comment period commenced in late February and public comments were included in the Action Plan prior to the City Council public hearing. The City directly contacted and consulted a diverse group of public and private sector agencies providing services within the City of Temecula to help identify the available resources and community needs. Stakeholders represent a broad spectrum of interests. The industries and professions represented included: 9 2015-2016 CITY OF TE l E ULA • Affordable housing provision; • Child protective services; • Fair housing; • Foreclosure/loss mitigation prevention; • Higher education; • Homeless services; • Landlord/tenant services; • Rental property owners and managers; • Senior services; • Services for low income residents; • Services for single mothers; • Mental health services; • Social services; and • Youth development. Participating stakeholders serve a variety of populations in Temecula, including; • Elderly; • Families on CalWorks cash assistance; • Immigrants; • Low income individuals; • Persons with a developmental disability; • Persons and families who are homeless; • Persons with HIV/AIDS; • Persons with a mental illness; • Persons with a physical disability; • Persons with substance abuse/addiction; • Victims of domestic violence; • Single mothers; and • Youth. The City is committed to participation of minorities, non-English speaking persons, and persons with disabilities in the Consolidated Plan process. Wherever a significant number of extremely low- and low-income persons speak and read a primary language other than English, translation services at all public hearings are provided in such language if translation services are available and requested in advance at least 72 hours prior to the public meeting. In 2011, as part of the development of the 2012-2016 Five -Year Consolidated Pian, a community needs assessment survey was prepared and distributed to all known community service organizations operating within the City, local government agencies providing services in Temecula, the Temecula libraries, the Temecula Senior Center, and various community centers. Additionally, the survey was posted on the City's website and distributed at the two community workshops held on November 16, 2011. The survey listed several needs categories for the 2012-2016 planning period, including: housing, neighborhood services, community services, business and jobs, and special needs. Each category contained sub -categories to assist respondents in focusing and prioritizing specific needs. Survey results were tabulated and incorporated within the Consolidated Plan and each succeeding Program Year Action Plan. Based on the community needs assessment survey, the community workshops, and consultation with various service providers, the following needs were identified as important: 10 2015-2016 CITY of TEMECULA Residents responding to the survey identified the following as top needs in the community: • Job creation/retention; • Health care facilities; and • Street/alley improvements as top community needs. Stakeholders responding to the survey identified the following as top needs in the community: • Job creation/retention; • Homeless shelters/services; and • Affordable rental housing as top community needs. Public meeting attendees responding to the survey identified the following as top needs in the community: • Improving bike path linkages; • Supportive services to single mothers; and • Upgrading the Boys & Girls Club facility as top needs. The needs listed above were considered and analyzed during the funding review process, and incorporated into the development of the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan. 2. Provide a summary of citizen comments or views on the plan. No comments were received. 3. Provide a written explanation of comments not accepted and the reasons why these comments were not accepted. The City accepted all comments during the citizen participation process. 11 2015-2Q16 CITY OF TEME ULA Resources 91.220(c)(1) and (c}02) 4. Identify the federal, state, and local resources (including program income) the jurisdiction expects to receive to address the needs identified in the plan. Federal resources should include Section 8 funds made available to the jurisdiction, Low Income Housing Tax Credits, and competitive McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act funds expected to be available to address priority needs and specific objectives identified in the strategic plan. The following resources are available to the City of Temecula and will be used to carry out the 2012 — 2016 Strategic Plan and the 2015-2016 Action Plan of the 2012- 2016 Consolidated Plan. Federal Resources Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Urban communities may use funds to address neighborhood revitalization, economic development, provisions of improved community facilities, prevention and elimination of slums or blight, and activities aiding low and moderate income families. For the 2015 Action Plan, the City will be receiving $540,214 of CDBG Entitlement funds. These funds have been allocated as indicated in the listing of Proposed Projects to address the priority needs identified in the 2012 — 2016 Strategic Plan. There is no match required for these funds. The City does not anticipate receiving any other federal resources to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan that address the needs of low- and moderate -income (LMI) persons. The City will continue to participate in all eligible programs and projects offered by Riverside County including the: • Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance; and • Mortgage Credit Certificate Program (MCC) State and Local Resources The City was awarded a Housing -Related Parks (HRP) Program grant through the California State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). Based on the City's investment in the construction of 91 lower-income units between 2010 and 2013, and it's compliance with State Housing Element law, the City qualified to receive $321,100 in HPR Program grant funds to help fund the construction of a Special Needs Playground. The Special Needs Playground project is located in one of Temecula's disadvantaged census tracts comprising 47 percent LMI households. Although this project is not listed as a priority in the 2012-2016 Strategic Plan, it will directly benefit a low- and moderate -income area (LMA) and persons with special needs. 12 4015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Other Resources The City of Temecula allocates a small portion of the Community Service budget (approximately $75,000) to provide human services directly to Temecula residents through contracts with non-profit agencies. The projects listed below received funding in 2014. Each year applications for the Temecula Community Services grant funding program are accepted in July, and funding awards our announced in November. All From the Heart — Support Our Troops All From the Heart - Wheels For Warriors Assistance League of Temecula Valley (ALTV) -Building and Grounds Improvements and Maintenance Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County - AM/PM Transportation and Enrichment Program for Low Income Youth Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley - A Brush with Kindness - offset home ks to seniors, disabled and low-income homeowners Hospice of the Valleys - Senior Assistance Program -end of life services Michelle's Place Breast Cancer Resource Center - Breast Health Assistance Our Nicholas Foundation -- Peace of Mind (safety kits for autistic families) Rose Again Foundation — The Kids of Summer $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 2,000 Rotary Club of Temecula Foundation - Holiday Food Baskets $ 5,000 Senior Citizens Service Center of the Temecula Rancho Area, Inc. - Food Distribution Society of St. Vincent De Paul - New Freezer Special Olympics Temecula Valley — Training Programs $ 5,000 S 4.285 $ 2,500 T.E.A.M. Evangelical Assistance Ministries — Food Distribution $ 2,500 $ 5,000 Temecula Valley People Helping People — Holiday Food and Gift Program Waves Project Inc. — Waves Project Total $ 4, 800 $ 71,085 5. Explain how federal funds will leverage resources from private and non-federal public sources. To maximize the funding resources in its efforts to meeting its comprehensive community development and housing goals, the City of Temecula will continue to seek leveraging through additional eligible resources, including private and public. The public service providers leverage private donations and local support from United Way and other organizations and agencies for at least five percent (5%) of the operating costs for non-profit programs funded with CDBG. The City continues to apply for non-federal funds that may become available through the state or county to help address priority needs. 13 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Other public/private funding sources leveraged include, but are not limited to: • City General Funds • SB 821 Funds: Senate Bill 821 (SB 821) funds are State block grants awarded annually to local jurisdictions for bicycle and pedestrian projects within California. The source of SB 821 originate from the State of California's gasoline tax, and is administered by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) and can be used in conjunction with the CDBG Program to assist in meeting annual goals/objectives. Annual Objectives 91.220(c)(3) 6. Provide a summary of specific objectives that will be addressed during the program year. The City will be addressing five (5) primary goals in Program Year 4 (2015-2016): 1. Decent Housing (DH -1) (Availability/Accessibility) 2. Continuum of Care (Availability/Accessibility) 3. Suitable Living Environment (SL -2, SL -3) (Affordability/Sustainability) 4. Economic Opportunity (EO -1) (Availability/Accessibility) 5. Administration (Program implementation and planning activities) The City's key objectives for 2015-16 funding period include the following: • Preserving the existing affordable housing stock and assuring its continuing quality (DH) • Encourage local incentives for developers to create affordable housing (DH) • Affirmatively further fair housing (DH) • Improving the safety and livability of neighborhoods (SL) • Assisting persons at risk of becoming homeless • Remove barriers to accessibility throughout the City (SL) • Eliminating blighting influences and the deterioration of property and facilities (SL) • Increasing the access to quality public and private facilities (SL) • Ensuring services are available to all residents especially youth, seniors, permanently disabled, homeless and low-income households (SL) • Establishment, stabilization and expansion of small business (including micro - businesses (EO) • The provision of public services concerned with employment (EO) 14 2015-2016 _ CITY OF TEMP ULA Description of Activities 91.220(d) and (e) 7. Provide a summary of the eligible programs or activities that will take place during the program year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the strategic plan. Describe the outcome measures for activities in accordance with Federal Register Notice dated March 7, 2006, i.e., general objective category (decent housing, suitable living environment, economic opportunity) and general outcome category (availability/accessibility, affordability, sustainability). Overall Priority. The overall priority for the Action Plan is to use these Federal funds to increase self-sufficiency and economic opportunity for lower income residents and individuals with special needs so that they can achieve a reasonable standard of living. The national objectives and performance outcome measurement system established by HUD are the basis for assigning priorities to needs for which funding may be allocated. National Objectives. In order for an activity or project to be eligible for funding, it must qualify as meeting one of the three national objectives of the program: 1. Principally benefit (at least 51%) low and moderate income persons; 2. Aid in the prevention of slums or blight; or 3. Meet community development needs having a particular urgency. The objective and outcome that will be achieved is included in each of the planned activities and is identified using a numbering system that ties to the Community Planning and Development Performance Measurement System developed by HUD. The primary objective of the CDBG program is to develop viable urban communities. Based upon this intent, it must be determined which of the following three objectives best describe the purpose of an activity: • Provide decent housing (DH); • Provide a suitable living environment (SL); and/or • Expand economic opportunities, principally for lower income persons (EO). Each activity must also meet specific performance outcomes that are related to at least one of the following: • Availability/Accessibility (1); • Affordability (2); or • Sustainability -Promoting Livable or Viable Communities (3) In addition to national objectives and performance measurements, the City must weigh and balance the input from different groups and assign funding priorities that best bridge the gaps in the City's service delivery system. The City received input through outreach efforts helping to prioritize funding for community facilities, community services, homeless facilities and services, housing, economic development, and public improvements. Projects are reviewed and funding allocations are made based upon the above criteria, including the projects' ability to reach and serve the areas and persons with the greatest need. 15 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA The City is committed to allocating funds that serve the needs of the lowest income and most disadvantaged residents. Households with less than fifty -percent (50%) percent of the area median income, particularly those with extremely low incomes, less than thirty -percent (30%) percent of area median income, are priorities. The City has established priorities for allocating funds based on a number of criteria, including: the established need; urgency of the need; cost efficiency; eligibility of activities/programs; funding program limitations; capacity and authority for implementing actions; consistency with City goals, policies, and efforts; identified gaps in service; availability of other funding sources to address specific needs; comments and correspondence from interested agencies and organizations; and feedback from the general public. Based on a comprehensive needs assessment, priority ranking was assigned to each category of housing and community development needs according to the following HUD criteria: High Priority: Activities to address this need are expected to be funded with CDBG funds during the five-year period. Medium Priority: If CDBG funds are available, activities to address this need may be funded during the five-year period. Low Priority: The City will not directly fund activities using CDBG funds to address this need during the next five -years. No Such Need: The City finds there is no such need for activities or the need is already substantially addressed. The proposed One -Year Action Plan is then prepared. The applications and funding recommendations are submitted to the Finance Committee for consideration. Upon final funding recommendations, a 30 -day public comment period and a 10 -day noticed public hearing are scheduled. The final One Year Action Plan is presented to the Temecula City Council for approval. The One -Year Action Plan is then submitted to HUD at least 45 days prior to the start of the program year. 16 2015-2016 CITY OF TEM ECU LA Draft Summary of Program Year 4 Funded Projects, Objectives, and Outcomes 1. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor. Address: Project Description: Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement Public Facilities - High City of Temecula 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Design and construct a new playground structure to replace the existing dilapidated play equipment at Sam Hicks Park. Project includes removal of old equipment, and installation of new equipment, and resurfacing according to ADA Guidelines. CDBG funds will be used for project delivery administration, design and construction costs. 41970 Moreno Road, Temecula, CA 92590 432.15 03F Parks, Recreational Facilities LMA — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL} Sustainability (3) One Public Park Improved for 1360 LMI Persons Completion of Public Improvements Public Agency — Entitlement Community CDBG $122,338 (Reallocated funds per Substantial Amendment) 2., Project: Priority Need: Sponsor. Address: Project Description: Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Old Town Sidewalk Improvement Project Infrastructure - High City of Temecula 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Design and construct two new segments of sidewalk in the Old Town District, including complete curb and gutter installation and improved accessibility according to ADA Guidelines. CDBG funds will be used for project delivery administration, project design and construction costs. Old Town Front Street and Fifth Street, Temecula, CA 92590 512 03L Sidewalks LMA — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL} Sustainability (3) Two Segments of Sidewalk Improved for 1255 LMI Persons Completion of Public Improvements Public Agency — Entitlement Community CDBG $351,140 17 2015-2016 CITY OF TE ULA 3. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: 4. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Critical Home Maintenance & Repairs Program Owner Occupied Housing - High Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley 27475 Ynez Road, Suite 390, Temecula CA 92593 The program provides preventative home maintenance and critical home repair services to low-income homeowners. CDBG funds will be used for program administration costs (salaries and benefits). Citywide 14A Rehab: Single Unit Residential LMH — LowiMod Benefit Decent Housing (DH) Sustainability (3) 15 LMI Homeowners Number of Housing Units Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $26,223 (Reallocated funds per Substantial Amendment) Solar Affordable Housing Program Owner Occupied Housing - High Grid Alternatives 1257 Columbia Avenue, Suite D5, Riverside, CA 92507 The program provides purchase and installation of photovoltaic solar systems to low-income homeowners. CDBG funds will be used for staff salaries and benefits. Citywide 14F Energy Efficiency Improvements LMH — LowiMod Benefit Decent Housing (DH) Affordability (2) 2 LMI Homeowners Number of Housing Units Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $12,000 (Reallocated funds per Substantial Amendment) 18 2015-2016 CITY OF TEM E L 5. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: 6. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Fair Housing (Anti -discrimination) & Landlord/Tenant Counseling Public Services - High Fair Housing Council of Riverside County P.O. Box 1068, Riverside CA 92503 The program provides fair housing education, training, & enforcement programs for low income households. CDBG funds will be used for staff salaries and benefits and other operations costs. Citywide 05J Fair Housing Activities (Subject to Pub. Serv. Cap) LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL) Availability/Accessibility (1) 160 LMI Persons Number of Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $10,000 Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Operation School Bell Public Services - High Assistance League of Temecula Valley 28720 Via Montezuma, Temecula, CA 92590 The program provides clothes and school supplies to children from low income families. CDBG funds will purchase clothing for children. 28720 Via Montezuma, Temecula, CA 92590 512 05D Youth Services LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL} Affordability (2) 64 LMI Students Number of Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $7,892 19 2015-2016 CITY OF TEM CULA 7. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Domestic Violence Services Program Public Services - High Safe Alternatives for Everyone (S.A.F.E.) 28910 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA 92590 The program provides a provision of services to at -risk youth and families to avoid violence and abuse. CDBG funds will be used for staff salaries and benefits. Location: 28910 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Census Tract: 512 HUD Matrix Code: 05G Battered and Abused Spouses National Objective: LMC - Low/Mod Benefit Primary Objective Category: Suitable Living Environment (SL} Outcome Category: Availability/Accessibility (1) Expected Accomplishment: 131 LMI Persons Performance Indicator: Number of Persons Served Type of Recipient: Non -Profit Subrecipient Funding Source: CDBG $7,892 8. Project: Before and After School Care for Kids Priority Need: Public Services - High Sponsor: Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County Address: 28790 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Project Description: The program provides before and after school care for underserved low income youth. CDBG funds will be used for program "scholarships" to reduce child care costs for families. Location: 28790 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Census Tract: 512 HUD Matrix Code: 05D Youth Services National Objective: LMC - Low/Mod Benefit Primary Objective Category: Suitable Living Environment (SLS Outcome Category: Affordability (2) Expected Accomplishment: 15 LMI Students Performance Indicator: Number of Persons Served Type of Recipient: Non -Profit Subrecipient Funding Source: CDBG $7,892 20 2015-2 CITY of TEMECULA Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description:. Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Objective: Outcome: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: 10. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: SMURF Childcare and Adult Education Program Public Services - High Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF) 31805 Temecula Parkway #389, Temecula, CA 92592 The program provides support for underserved low-income youth and single mothers through a provision of fellowship and training programs. CDBG funds will be used for consultant services and program supplies. 41919 Moreno Dr. Suite D, Temecula, CA 92590 512 05 Public Services LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL} Availability/Accessibility (1) 60 LMI Families Number of Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $7,892 Emergency Food/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Public Services - High Senior Citizens Service Center 41538 Eastman Drive, Unit B & 0, Murrieta, CA 92562 The program provides food and supplies to low-income families, and individuals who are homeless and at -risk of homelessness. CDBG funds will be used for food and operation costs. 41538 Eastman Drive, Unit B & C, Murrieta, CA 92562 512 05 Public Services LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL) / Continuum of Care (00C) Availability/Accessibility (1) 1060 Persons Number of Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $7,892 21 2015-2016 CITY OF TEM ECUL . 11. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Circle of Care Food Ministry Public Services - High VNW Circle of Care P.O. Box 218, Temecula CA 92593 The program provides bi-weekly food box distribution to low- income families, and individuals who are homeless and at -risk of homelessness. CDBG funds will be used for operation costs. 27711 Diaz Road, Temecula, CA 92590 512 05 Public Services LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL) / Continuum of Care (CoC) Availability/Accessibility (1) 120 Persons Number of Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $7,892 12. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Temecula Community Pantry Public Services - High Temecula Community Pantry 28922 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA 92591 The program provides food and supplies to low-income families, and individuals who are homeless and at -risk of homelessness. CDBG funds will be used for operation costs. 28922 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA 92591 512 05 Public Services LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL} / Continuum of Care (Coq Availability/Accessibility (1) 715 Persons Number of Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $7,892 22 2015-2016 CITY OFTE E 13. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Inclement Weather Shelter Program Public Services - High Community Mission of Hope 41680 Enterprise Circle South, Suite C, Temecula, CA 92591 The program provides temporary shelter and a provision of services to individuals who are homeless. CDBG funds will be used for operation costs. 27622 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, CA 92591 512 05 Public Services LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Suitable Living Environment (SL} / Continuum of Care (CoC) Availability/Accessibility (1) 30 Persons Number of Homeless Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $7,892 14. Project: Priority Need: Sponsor: Address: Project Description: Location: Census Tract: HUD Matrix Code: National Objective: Primary Objective Category: Outcome Category: Expected Accomplishment: Performance Indicator: Type of Recipient: Funding Source: Just Add One Public Services - High City of Temecula Economic Development Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 The program provides job skills training to low-income youth through a provision of workshops and local workforce employer connections. CDBG funds will be used for staff administration costs and program/workshop operation costs and supplies. 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 512 05H Employment Training LMC — Low/Mod Benefit Economic Opportunity (EO) Availability/Accessibility (1) 55 LMI Youth Number of Persons Served Non -Profit Subrecipient CDBG $7,892 23 201.5 2016 CITY OF TEM ECU LA 15. Project: Program Administration Sponsor: City of Temecula Address: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Project Description: Planning and administration funding is intended to provide funding for general staff administration of CDBG programs and activities, including Integrated Disbursement and Information System management, program planning, reporting, budgeting, and subrecipient training and monitoring. Location: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 HUD Matrix Code: 21A, General Program Administration Objective Category: Administration Type of Recipient: Public Agency — Entitlement Community Funding Source: CDBG $108,042 24 2015-2016 CITY OF TEME ULA Geographic Distribution/Allocation Priorities 91.220(d) and (f) 8. Describe the geographic areas of the jurisdiction (including areas of low income families and/or racial/minority concentration) in which assistance will be directed during the next year. Where appropriate, the jurisdiction should estimate the percentage of funds the jurisdiction plans to dedicate to target areas. The City of Temecula is located along Interstate 15 (I-15) in southwestern Riverside County, just north of the San Diego County line. The current population of Temecula is 106,289. The population of Temecula is a multi -culturally diverse community. About 30 percent of the population is non-white. Hispanics of any race are the largest non-white ethnic group, comprising about 25 percent of the population, along with Asians (9.8%) and African Americans (4.1%). As of the 2010 U.S. Census, the City of Temecula had 31,781 households. Of the 31,781 households in Temecula, 81.3% were considered families. Among the non - family households, 74.9% were single people living alone, including 23.3% elderly persons. The average household size is 3.18 persons per household, with a median income of $72,433 in 2010. The 2010 U.S. Census counted 34,004 total housing units. Of these, 6.5% were vacant. The unemployment rate is currently 10.8 percent, and almost a quarter (24.6%) of the population in Temecula falls into the lower (extremely low, very low, and low) income category. The City of Temecula will direct assistance to low- to moderate -income Census Tracts in the City (Target Areas). These CDBG Target Areas are located directly west of Interstate -15 and in the central city. The public facility projects, Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Rehabilitation, and Old Town Sidewalk Improvement projects, aggregately representing $475,984 (68%) in funding this fiscal year, are located within one of the Target Areas of the City (Census Tract 512). In addition to directing assistance to low- to moderate -income areas, the City will provide direct assistance to limited clientele populations throughout the City. While the majority of the selected public services activities in previous program years have served low - and moderate -income clientele residing within the City of Temecula under the Limited Clientele National Objective, many participating LMI clientele also reside within the CDBG Target Areas. 9. Describe the reasons for the allocation priorities, the rationale for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA) during the next year, and identify any obstacles to addressing underserved needs. The City's primary method of allocating CDBG dollars is to assist low- to moderate - income areas and special needs populations. To the extent that specific geographic areas have greater needs than other areas in the City and/or if service and housing organizations are located in certain areas, they will receive a larger proportionate share of the funding. For sidewalk improvements, the City will focus on the geographic areas where sidewalks, curb cuts and related ADA accommodations are lacking. For affordable housing, the City's dollars (when feasible) will be allocated in 25 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA areas where affordable housing is lacking and/or infill areas that can accommodate affordable housing. During Program Year 4, the City will continue to allocate resources to those activities/programs defined as high or medium priority pursuant to those established within the Consolidated Plan. Activities not identified as high/medium priority are not included as part of Program Year 2015-2016. Activities listed as high and medium priority include assistance with residential improvement including utility costs through solar equipment, facility and infrastructure improvements including accessibility upgrades, and a provision of services including child care, clothing, food, fair housing, shelter, and other social services. As mentioned in the City's Strategic Plan, the greatest obstacle to meeting underserved needs is lack of funding. The City has many needs that exceed available funding, including infrastructure maintenance and repair, housing and services to special needs populations, comprehensive housing and services to assist persons who are chronically homeless move into supportive housing environments and provision of affordable housing. Both private foundations and public agencies have limited resources available to address social, community, and economic development goals pale in comparison to the recognized needs. For example, the City was able to fund only 37 percent of the public service requests received from non-profit and government agencies this fiscal year. To address this lack of funding obstacle, the City strongly encourages its sub - recipients to seek other resources, forge new partnerships, and to leverage additional funding whenever possible from local, State, Federal, and private sources. The City urges CDBG funded programs and services to be flexible, while at the same time to be as efficient and effective as possible to achieve expected performance outcomes. 26 2015-2016 CITY OF TEM ECU L► Annual Affordable Housing Goals 91.220(g) Complete and submit the HUD Table 3B (Annual Housing Completion Goals) 10. Describe the one-year goals for the number of homeless, non -homeless, and special -needs households to be provided affordable housing using funds made available to the jurisdiction and one-year goals for the number of households to be provided affordable housing through activities that provide rental assistance, production of new units, rehabilitation of existing units, or acquisition of existing units using funds made available to the jurisdiction. The term affordable housing shall be defined in 24 CFR 92.252 for rental housing and 24 CFR 92.254 for homeownership. As stated above, there are limited opportunities and funding available to provide affordable housing opportunities. The City will attempt to seek new partnerships in the upcoming year. During Fiscal Year 2015-2016, the City will continue to address affordable housing needs through the following programs: Goal/Objective: Promote, preserve, and assist in the development of affordable housing for low and moderate income residents, special needs groups, those at -risk of homelessness, and disproportionately impacted residents. Strategy 1: Participate in available Community Development Programs offered by Riverside County. • Continue to participate and promote the County of Riverside Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program authorizing low- and moderate income first-time home buyers to take a federal income tax credit of up to 15 percent of the annual interest paid on the mortgage. • Continue to support Section 8 rental assistance vouchers to extremely -low and low-income households through the Riverside County Housing Authority Voucher Program. Strategy 2: Encourage local incentives for developers to create affordable housing. • Implement an Affordable Housing Overlay Program approved by the Temecula City Council as part of the 2014-2021 Housing Element. Strategy 3: Affirmatively further fair housing. • Continue to implement recommendations from the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Report completed as part of the 2012-2016 Consolidated Plan. Strategy 4: Preserve the supply of affordable ownership housing stock through rehabilitation. • Allocate $26,223 in CDBG funds to the Habitat for Humanity, Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, for preventative home maintenance and critical home repair services to low-income homeowners. 27 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA • Allocate $12,000 in CDBG funds to the GRID Alternatives, Solar Affordable Housing Program, for the installation of photovoltaic solar systems to low-income homeowners. Public Housing 91.220(h) 11. Describe the manner in which the plan of the jurisdiction will help address the needs of public housing and activities it will undertake during the next year to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership. 12. If the public housing agency is designated as "troubled" by HUD or otherwise is performing poorly, the jurisdiction shall describe the manner in which it will provide financial or other assistance in improving its operations to remove such designation during the next year. The City does not have public housing; and therefore does not undertake activities to increase resident initiatives; however, the City will continue to support the Section 8 rental assistance voucher program for low-income households administered through the Riverside County Housing Authority. Any publicly subsidized housing within the City is provided and managed by the Housing Authority of Riverside County and the Riverside County Economic Development. The City will continue to support their efforts. Homeless and Special Needs 91.220(i) 13. Describe, briefly, the jurisdiction's plan for the investment and use of available resources and describe the specific planned action steps it will take over the next year aimed at eliminating chronic homelessness. 14. Describe specific action steps to address the needs of persons that are not homeless identified in accordance with 91.215(e). 15. Homelessness Prevention—Describe planned action steps over the next year to address the individual and families with children at imminent risk of becoming homeless. As an entitlement community, the City of Temecula is eligible to participate within the Riverside County Continuum of Care, which includes a 10 -year strategy to end homelessness. The strategy is based on three (3) main activities and ten (10) recommendations, summarized below: Activity 1: Preventing New Episodes of Homelessness Recommendation 1: Homeless Prevention: Implement a County -wide homeless prevention strategy designed to prevent at least half (50%) of the 7,000 households who become homeless each year from becoming homeless during the first five (5) years of implementation of this plan. Recommendation 2: Discharge Planning: Establish County -wide protocols and procedures to prevent people from being discharged from public and private institutions of care into homelessness that will help decrease the number of persons being discharged into homelessness by at least 10% annually. 28 2015-2016 CITY OF TE E U L Activity 2: Ending Chronic and Episodic Homelessness Recommendation 3: Street Outreach: Expand street outreach programs throughout the County that bring social services directly to chronically homeless people in a more "assertive" way in order to 1) decrease the number of chronic individuals each year by at least 10% and 2) help prevent additional persons from living on the streets for one (1) year or more during the first five (5) years of implementation of this plan. Recommendation 4: Shelter Beds: Create 150 additional shelter beds throughout the County for individuals living on the streets and encourage participating in a case management plan during the first five (5) years of implementation of the strategy. Recommendation 5: Transitional Housing: Create 75 additional transitional housing units consisting of 225 beds to serve families who are living on the streets and encourage participation in a case management plan during the first five (5) years of implementation of the strategy. Recommendation 6: Permanent Supportive Affordable Housing: Create at least 500 beds or units of permanent supportive housing for chronic homeless persons during the first five (5) years of implementation of the strategy. Recommendation 7: Permanent Affordable Housing: Develop 1,500 units of permanent affordable housing for extremely low-, very low- and low-income individuals during the first five (5) years of implementation of the strategy. Recommendation 8: Homeless Management Information System: Engage full participation from all homeless prevention, emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent support housing, and related supportive service programs in the County of Riverside Homeless Management Information System during the first five (5) years of implementation of the strategy. Recommendation 9: Mainstream Resources: Create a streamlined benefits system featuring a single application process for multiple programs in order to expedite enrollment and access to available resources for homeless and at risk to homeless individuals and families during the first two (2) years of implementation of the strategy. Activity 3: Developing Resources to Combat Homelessness Recommendation 10: Mainstream Resources create a Housing Trust Fund that received an ongoing dedicated source (s) of public funding to support 1) production and preservation of affordable housing including housing for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households; 2)homeless prevention activities; and 3) ancillary supportive services during the first year of implementation of the strategy. During Fiscal Year 2015-2016 the City will continue to address homeless and special needs through the following programs: Coal/Objective: Provide programs and services to assist families and persons who are homeless find shelter, transitional housing, and access needed services. 29 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Strategy 1: Actively support regional and sub -regional efforts to provide a coordinated continuum of housing and services for homeless. • Continue to be an active member of the Continuum of Care (CoC) for Riverside County and to provide support on efforts such as the ten-year County plan (2007- 2017) to end homelessness. Strategy 2: Work with public, private and non -private partners to increase funding and leverage resources to prevent homelessness and encourage stability. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Community Mission of Hope, Inclement Weather Shelter Voucher Program, for operations in assisting persons who are homeless with temporary shelter and general human services during the cold winter months. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Senior Citizens Service Center, for the provision of food to LMI families and persons who are homeless. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the Temecula Community Pantry, for the provision of food to LMI families and persons who are homeless. • Allocate $7,892 CDBG funds to the VNW Circle of Care, Food Ministry Program, for the provision of food to LMI families and persons who are homeless. The City will continue to build new, and expand existing partnerships among private and public sector organizations to ensure a comprehensive social services infrastructure that provides services to all ages and addresses gaps in services. This includes a network of public and private organizations to address homelessness, and a broad structure of social support for special needs populations. Persons who are homeless and at -risk of homelessness in Temecula will be assisted by the City through the provision of block grant funds to homeless services and other social service providers. CDBG funds will be provided to assist with the operations of the following social service agencies who work with low income and special needs residents, many of whom are also at -risk of homelessness: • Food pantries • Domestic violence services • Child care services • Provide clothing and school supplies to children in low-income families The resources in Temecula are limited to address the needs of persons who are homeless and at -risk of homelessness. The city does not receive federal funds such as the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG). 30 2015-2016 CITY OF TE E ULA. Barriers to Affordable Housing 91.220(j) 16. Describe the actions that will take place during the next year to remove barriers to affordable housing. Barriers to affordable housing are frequently caused when the incentive to develop such housing is removed due to excessive development costs, governmental regulation, and community opposition. Some development costs are driven by economic conditions and other factors that affect the real estate market. These are often beyond the control of local government policies. In the City of Temecula, the primary barriers to affordable housing are not created through local policies. Most recently, the largest barrier to affordable housing is the elimination of the City's Redevelopment Agency through State legislative action. Historically, the Redevelopment Housing set-aside fund has provided all of the funding for affordable housing development. In 2014, the City completed an update to the General Plan Housing Element that includes an analysis of barriers to housing development. The 2014-2021 Housing Element revealed land use barriers to affordable housing and therefore development goals and policies to encourage affordable housing development. Specifically, as part of the 2014-2021 Housing Element, the City has committed to implementing an Affordable Housing Overlay Program that provides local incentives for developers to create affordable housing. The City uses a multi -faceted strategy to address barriers to affordable housing. A major focus involves the use of both financial and processing assistance to maximize as many housing units as possible. This approach allows the City to quantify affordable housing production and make adjustments to development strategies as necessary. Development fees and approval delays add to the cost of development. In addition, inflation can increase the cost of both materials and labor. These factors combined with negative public perceptions serve as a major disincentive to the construction of affordable housing and are seen as obstacles by qualified developers. The City has implemented the following policies as mitigation for potentially foreseen barriers to affordable housing: • Project Manager. The City has a designated staff liaison to work specifically with affordable housing developers and their representatives. • Public Outreach: The City continues to educate the public about the social and economic benefits of affordable housing. ▪ Fast Track and Priority Processing: Expediting of affordable housing construction projects through all phases of the approval process. • Development Standard Flexibility: The City considers flexible modifications of development standards identified in the Zoning Code. 31 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Other Actions 91.220(k) 17. Describe the actions that will take place during the next year to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, evaluate and reduce the number of housing units containing lead- based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level families develop institutional structure, enhance coordination between public and private agencies (see 91.215(a), (b), (i), (j), (k}, and (1)). Lead based paint hazards. The primary program that identified and mitigated lead based paint hazards for the City was the Residential Improvement Program previously funded under Temecula's Redevelopment Agency (RDA). Since the elimination of redevelopment, the City is working to create strategies to reduce lead- based paint hazards. While the City of Temecula does not currently have a stand-alone lead prevention program, the City will continue to work closely with the County of Riverside to address these issues. The County provides services, education, referrals, and public health assistance to Temecula residents through its HIV/AIDS programs, Lead Hazard Control Program, Elderly Services/Office of Aging, Homeless Program Units, Substance Abuse Programs, Mental Health Programs, and Anti -Poverty Programs. Additionally, the City and its CDBG subrecipients provide lead based paint brochures to qualified homeowners who participate in the City's home rehabilitation program — Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program administered by Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley. Families living in poverty. Poverty is defined by the Social Security Administration as the minimum income an individual must have to survive at a particular point in time. Although there are many causes of poverty, some of the "more pronounced" causes of poverty include the following: • Low income -earning capability; • Low educational attainments and job skills; • Discrimination; and • Person limitations (e.g. developmental and physical disabilities, mental illness, drug/alcohol dependency, etc.) Some other important causes of poverty related to those mentioned above include: unemployment or underemployment; lack of affordable, decent housing; negative images of people who are recipients of assistance; the lack of available funding; and lack of policy and widespread community support for poverty issues (this includes the lack of additional federal and state funding programs to address the problem of poverty); lack of affordable childcare and health care; age; cultural and language barriers; lack of behavioral changes of people in poverty; limited access to services; and domestic abuse. Although the many and varied solutions for the reduction or elimination of poverty appear endless, costly, and complex, the City employs a variety of strategies to help reduce the number of households with incomes below the poverty line, including efforts to stimulate economic growth and additional job opportunities. An example 32 2015- 2016 CITY OF TEMECULA would be economic development activities that help create additional jobs. Economic development opportunities, such as higher paying jobs, are very important. The City's primary emphasis locally in regard to anti -poverty strategies is to provide adequate housing to low-income families and fund a range of support services that will assist them in meeting their basic needs, including food, health care, supportive services and transportation. A number of such support programs are funded through the Annual Action Plan, public services process. Other programs are provided locally through other funding mechanisms. It is difficult in the current economic climate to reduce poverty; instead, many jurisdictions focus on stabilizing those households most at -risk of poverty and homelessness. Between 2000 and 2010, the poverty rate of Temecula doubled, from 7 percent to 14 percent. The City's goal during the next five years is to prevent future increases in poverty by providing a safety net of support services for those households who have experienced job and economic losses. Managing the Process. The Community Development Department staff oversees the comprehensive administration of the City's CDBG Program and the monitoring of all program activities. The Community Development staff works in cooperation with the Finance Department staff to manage and monitor CDBG funds jointly. For Program Year 2015-2016 the City's CDBG Program can be summarized into four (4) main Program/Project Categories: 1. Housing Activities and Continuum of Care 2. Public Services 3. Community Facilities & Infrastructure Projects 4. CDBG Program Administration & Planning The Community Development staff is responsible for the preparation and submission of all required reporting/documentation including: Five -Year Consolidated Plans, Annual Action Plans, Comprehensive Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPER), Subrecipient Agreements, procurement contracts, CDBG Program Policies & Procedures, Environmental Review Record (ERR), noticeslpublication announcements for meetings, and program forms. Institutional Structure. For its inaugural Consolidated Plan the City of Temecula purposefully elected to structure its CDBG Program under a simple framework. The roles of the various City departments and other entities (public and private) involved in the implementation of the City's CDBG Program, including the 2015-2016 Program Year, are outline below: City Manager's Office: Responsible for the day-to-day operations of the City, including financial commitments and program staffing. The Office ensures that City services, including the CDBG program, are performed to the highest standard in accordance with the City Council's goals and policies. Community Development Department: Coordinates the preparation of the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, and the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). The Department administers the CDBG programs, ensures satisfactory product and service delivery by all public service grantees, and is responsible for meeting all HUD CDBG program requirements. 33 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Finance Department: Responsible for managing the accounting, purchasing and budgeting operations. The Department is actively involved with the coordination of CDBG program revenue forecasts, project expenditures and reimbursement of grant funds. Public Works Department: Responsible for maintaining and operating all City -owned facilities including publicly maintained streets, parks, street lights, some drainage facilities, and traffic signals. The Department is actively involved in the selection, implementation, and monitoring of CDBG infrastructure and public facilities projects. Economic Development Department: Participates in CDBG programs and projects that encourage investment in the community, create jobs, and provide opportunities for residents and businesses. cog and Homeless Coalition of Riverside Countfor the Continuum of Care for Homelessness: Consists of representatives from public and private entities. Focuses on assessing the need for homeless and affordable housing services throughout Riverside County and recommend a continuum of care plan for the County on behalf of at risk and homeless individuals and families. Non -Profit Agencies: Represent local non-profit entities providing a wide array of services to the community. The City collaborates with various non-profit entities on many projects, including the City's CDBG Program. Monitoring. Additionally, the Community Development staff is responsible to monitor all projects and review all reimbursement requests. Staff oversees the monitoring of all public services subrecipients as well as coordinates with other departments staff on the completion of community facilities and/or infrastructure projects. Infrastructure and/or Community Facilities Projects include direct participation from the Engineering/Public Works Departments. The City's institutional structure for carrying out housing and community development activities is efficient. Performance of CDBG funded projects and activities are monitored in various ways depending on type of program and reporting requirements. Monitoring is viewed as a way to identify deficiencies and promote corrections in order to improve performance. The actual activity of monitoring helps promote quality performance, as well as identify any need for further technical assistance. The following is a description of the types of monitoring performed by staff: Performance Monitoring: Monitoring activities includes spot check monitoring of sub recipients which includes a review of reporting information to ensure compliance with the HUD requirement that beneficiaries be low income. Comprehensive monitoring includes on-site visits, interviews, telephone contacts and reports. Subrecipient Agreements are used to measure compliance by grant recipients. Financial Monitoring: All project costs are paid on a reimbursement basis. A request for reimbursement must have appropriate documentation attached to verify all expenditures. A current report of program activities must also be attached to the draw down request. Expenditures are not paid in advance. 34 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA The combination of data from the request and the program activities report provides the information necessary to input data into the IDIS system. Collecting this data during the program year is helpful in compiling reports. By requiring documentation in association with reimbursement, the City's Community Development staff are able to closely monitor program requirements and ensure that program goals are being met. Reporting/Tracking Systems: Performance is tracked and reported as stated above. Community Development staff reviews the reports and any discrepancies are addressed with the appropriate entities. Records on performance are kept in the project file. Accuracy of data is confirmed by site visits and monitoring. Environmental Review Compliance: Each project that is budgeted is first reviewed for compliance with the NEPA (National Environmental Protection Agency regulations). CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) regulations may also apply. Projects that are community service in nature are exempt from NEPA. Once the environmental analysis is determined, staff prepares the appropriate paperwork. When environmental clearance has been obtained, the project can move forward to City Council and/or bid, etc. as appropriate. The CDBG Planner monitors all environmental reviews. 18. Describe the actions to coordinate its housing strategy with local and regional transportation planning strategies to ensure to the extent practicable that residents of affordable housing have access to public transportation. As a member of the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG), the City of Temecula has been actively involved in regional activities and community forums offered by SCAG. The purpose of SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) is to provide a vision for transportation investments throughout the region. The City regularly expresses its needs and goals with respect to transportation at the various regional activities and community forums offered by SCAG and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). Transit -oriented development (TOD) is increasingly recognized as having the potential to improve the quality of life for American households, by creating vibrant, livable communities in proximity to transit. Improved access to transit can reduce transportation costs for working families and mitigate the negative impacts of automobile travel on the environment and the economy. The need for a mix of housing types that is affordable to a range of family incomes in proximity to transit is an important policy concern for the City of Temecula. The City has clearly identified several key priorities to achieve its transportation mobility and connectivity goals. These goals include working with local and regional transportation partners to leverage existing resources for all available transportation modes, and supporting local and regional efforts to enhance transit opportunities, including transit centers and park and ride facilities. The City most recently was a partner on a multi jurisdictional effort to establish livable communities' concepts, and a sustainable transportation system that addresses mobility, access, and safety along a 16 -mile corridor. The plan identified multi -modal opportunities to help create live -work and TOD communities with better access to public transit in the future. The City is committed to effective collaboration with many partners in order to achieve its public transportation priorities. 35 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA The City is also currently working on a plan to redevelop the Jefferson Corridor as a transit -oriented development (TOD) destination with multiple nodes including financial services, hotels, restaurants, light industrial and residential hubs linking to a nearby transit center, and the Old Town area at the south end of the corridor. Through the recent Housing Element Update, the City has identified sites that are suitable for the development of housing for very -low and low income households. A percentage of these sites are located in the old Town area and therefore close to retail opportunities, transit, and other services. Furthermore, the City's Housing Element analysis has determined that sufficient land is available and zoned adequately to address the lower-income housing need projected through 2021. The City aims to encourage the development of housing units in mixed-use areas, which better provide for access to transit, goods, services, and employment opportunities. PECIFI kA CDBG 91.220(1)(1) 1. Identify program income expected to be received during the program year, including: • amount expected to be generated by and deposited to revolving loan funds; • total amount expected to be received from each new float -funded activity included in this plan; and • amount expected to be received during the current program year from a float -funded activity described in a prior statement or plan. The City does not have any revolving or float -funded activities and does not plan to use them during the Consolidated Planning period. The 2015-2016 Action Plan does not include any programs that will generate program income. 2. Program income received in the preceding program year that has not been included in a statement or plan. None. 3. Proceeds from Section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in its strategic plan. None 4. Surplus funds from any urban renewal settlement for community development and housing activities. None. 5. Any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 36 2015-2016 None. 6. Income from float -funded activities. None. 7. Urgent need activities, only if the jurisdiction certifies. None; however, should an urgent need arise the City will process the necessary Action Plan amendments to address such need. 8. Estimated amount of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. The City estimates that 90-100 percent of CDBG funds will be used for activities that benefit persons of low- and moderate -income. Changing conditions provision. As market changes occur within Temecula, the City will rededicate funding sources to address the needs in other areas. • Priority changes in public facilities and infrastructure needs will be rededicated to public projects identified to meet the City's five year priority objectives. • Funding changes or elimination of public service activities will be rededicated to other, eligible public service activities and providers that submitted eligible applications and programs within the previous (most current) year's application cycle. • Completion of one project, with additional funding, primarily for public facilities and/or infrastructure, will be rededicated to another public facilities or infrastructure project. • An increase or reduction in the amount of funds estimated to be received in 2015-2016 will be rededicated and applied to a currently funded activity given it does not exceed the public service cap of 15 percent or the administration cap of 20 percent, or applied to another project from the City's five year priority objectives. Reallocation of Funds. The 2012-13 Fiscal Year was the City's first year participating as an Entitlement Community within the CDBG Program. This, in conjunction with other project specific factors, has resulted in some delay in set-up and commencement of some of the 2012-13 and 2013-14 programs/projects which were allocated funding. Consequently, the City will also be processing a formal Substantial Amendment to HUD to reallocate/re-program funds from various projects/programs included in the respective Annual Action Plans into projects/programs included in the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan. 37 2015-2016 CITY OF TEM ULA Project/Program Description Original CDBG Funding Amount ($) Transitional/ Supportive Housing Facility Recommended Re -Programmed Amount ($) Substantial Amendment Recommendation $150,000 $150,000 City anticipated acquiring an existing private multi -family site through partnership during Fiscal Year 2012-13 (Program Year 1), and budgeted for this housing facility project as part of the FY2012-13 Action Plan. However, as of February 2015, partnership for acquisition has not occurred. The City conducted extensive research regarding the feasibility of completing a transitional/supportive housing facility as planned. The proposed project is not expected to be able to be completed within the upcoming year. Recommendation is to re -program: (1) $122,338 of the Transitional/Supportive Housing Facility Project budget into the Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement Project to close the funding gap; (2) $12,000 into the Solar Affordable Home Program administrated by GRID Alternatives; and (3) $15,662 into the Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, all capital improvement projects included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Action Plan. Public Services: Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission (TMRM) Food Distribution Program $10,190 $10,190 Not all funds were used during implementation of the FY2013-14 Action Plan. Recommendation is to re -program unused/remaining balance of FY2013- 14 public service program funds into Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, and included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Action Plan. Public Services: Miscellaneous $128,333 38 $277 Not all funds were used during implementation of the FY2012-13 and FY2013-14 Action Plans. Recommendation is to re -program unused/remaining balance of public service program funds into Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Annual Action. 2015-2016 CITY F TEMECULA Planning & Administration: (Fair Housing Services) Total $198,550 $94 $487,073 $160,561 Not all funds were used during implementation of the FY2012-13 and FY2013-14 Action Plans. Recommendation is to re -program unused/remaining balance of administration program funds into Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program, administered by Habitat for Humanity, included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Annual Action. Summary of Reallocated/Reprogrammed Funding by Project. In total, $160,561 from Program Years 2012-13 ($150,280) and 2013-14 ($10,281) remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/program (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed into three capital projects included as part of the Program Year 2015-16 Annual Action Plan. 1. Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement Project: A total of $122,338 from Program Year 2012-13 remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/programs (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed to this park improvement project. 2. Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program: A total of $26,223 from Program Year 2012-13 and Program Year 2013-14 remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/programs (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed to this housing improvement program. 3. Solar Affordable Home Program: A total of $12,000 from Program Year 2012-13 remaining and/or unused funds from various projects/programs (see previous section) will be reallocated/reprogrammed to this housing improvement program. The City is fully committed to completing all CDBG programs/projects as timely as possible and will continue to work on completing programs/projects. Labor Standards. As a requirement of the CDBG Program, the City of Temecula is required to provide business opportunities to minority and women -owned businesses in connection with the activities funded through the CDBG Program. This applies to all contracting and subcontracting funded in whole or in part from CDBG funds. OMB Circular A-102 specifically indicates, "It is national policy to award a fair share of contracts to small and minority business firms. Grantees shall take similar appropriate affirmative action in support of women's enterprises and are encouraged to procure goods and services from labor surplus areas." Further, the Uniform Administrative Requirements of 24 CFR 85.36 (e) require the City to "take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority firms, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible." Lastly, under Section 570.507(b) -- Reports (24 CFR Part 570, CDBG Final Rule) to submit a report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the City's MBE-WBE contracting and subcontracting activity generated through the expenditure of HUD funds. As part of the bid solicitations list, the City includes MBE-WBE firms and encourages MBE-WBE firms to compete for CDBG related projects. Additionally, as required, the City ensures that Contract - 39 2015-2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Subcontract Activity Report and MBE-WBE Summary Reports are submitted to the Los Angeles Field Office of HUD. Racial concentrations. In 2010, the largest racial group in Temecula was white (71%), followed by Asian (at a much lower 10%). The slight majority of Temecula residents (57%) were non -Hispanic white and approximately one-quarter were of Hispanic origin. Figure AP -1 shows the racial and ethnic distribution of Temecula in 2000 and 2010. Figure AP -1. Population by Race and Ethnicity, City of Temecula, 2000 and 2010 Source: U S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census and 2010 Census Number Percent Number Percent Total population 57,716 100 100,097 100 Race American Indian and Alaska Native 497 0.9% 1,079 1.1% Asian 2,728 4.7% 9,765 9.8% Black or African American 1,974 3.4% 4,132 4.1% Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander 174 0.3% 368 0.4% White 45,555 78.9% 70,880 70.8% Some Other Race 4,276 7.4% 7,928 7.9% Two or More Faces 2,512 4.4% 5,945 5.9% Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino Non -Hispanic White 10,974 19.0% 40,007 69.3% 24,727 24.7% 57,246 57.2% The population proportion of all minority groups increased in between 2000 and 2010, while the non -Hispanic white population proportion dropped from 69 percent to 57 percent. Despite this increase in diversity, Temecula still has a smaller minority population than Riverside County as a whole. In Riverside County, the Hispanic population (45%) outnumbers the non -Hispanic white population (40%). One of the key components of a demographic analysis is an examination of the concentration of racial and ethnic minorities within a jurisdiction to detect evidence of segregation. In some cases, minority concentrations are a reflection of preferences e.g., minorities may choose to live near family and friends of the same race/ethnicities or where they have access to grocery stores or restaurants that cater to them. In other cases, minority populations are intentionally steered away or discouraged from living in certain areas. Housing prices can also heavily influence where minorities live, to the extent that there are economic disparities among persons of different races and ethnicities. According to HUD, an area of racial and ethnic concentration (also called a "minority impacted area") is defined as where the percentage of persons in a particular race or ethnic group is at least 20 percentage points higher than the percentage of persons in the category for the city as a whole. Using the above definition of concentration, block groups in Temecula have a concentration if the following exists: • A non -Hispanic white population proportion of 77 percent and more; • A Hispanic population proportion of 45 percent and more; • An Asian population proportion of 30 percent and more; and 40 2015-2016 ITV_ E ULA • A Black or African American population proportion of 24 percent and more. Figure AP -2 shows the percentage of non -Hispanic white residents within each block group in the City. There are no block groups within city boundaries that are 77 percent or more non -Hispanic white; however one block group immediately east of Temecula is non -Hispanic white -concentrated. Figure AP -2. Percent of Non -Hispanic White Population by Block Group, City of Temecula, 2010 Source: 2010 Census and BBC Research & Consulting. Figure AP -3 shows the ratio of Hispanics to total population by block group in the City. As the map demonstrates, there no block groups in the City with Hispanic concentrations. Figure AP -3. Percent of Hispanic/Latino Population by Block Group, City of Temecula, 2010 Source: 2010 Census and BBC Research & Consulting. Legend City of Temecula Less than 20 0% 200%to45.O% _ More than 45 0% 41 2015-2016 CITY OF TEM E ULA Figure AP -4 shows the proportion of Asian residents by block group in the City. There is one block group in the southwestern portion of the City with a concentration of Asian residents. Figure AP -4. Percent of Asian Population by Block Group, City of Temecula, 2010 Source: 2010 Census and BBC Research & Consulting. Figure AP -5 shows the proportion of African Americans by block group in the City. There are no block groups with concentrations of African Americans. Figure AP -5. Percent of Population that is African American, City of Temecula, 2010 Source: 2010 Census and BBC Research & Consulting . Legend City al Temecula Less than 12 O% 120%1 24 O% _ More than 24 0% 42 Appendix A. Certifications 'p1Md : ri; t)t5% y4e*I!I0lI1*c CPMP Non -State Grantee a�, IliOiII/oQ,f Certifications B9N OcvVv Many elements of this document may be completed electronically, however a signature must be manually applied and the document must be submitted in paper form to the Field Office. ❑ This certification does not apply. ® This certification is applicable. NON -STATE GOVERNMENT CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard. Anti -displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs. Drug Free Workplace -- It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about - a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; b. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; c. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will - a. Abide by the terms of the statement; and b. Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted - a. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or b. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications Version 1.3 Jurisdiction Anti -Lobbying -- To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: 8. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 9. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 10. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti -lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all su breci pients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Authority of Jurisdiction -- The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law (as applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan -- The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan. Section 3 -- It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135. Signature/Authorized Official Date rAaron Adams Name Cit Mana'er Title 41000 Main Street Address Temecula, CA 92590 City/State/Zip 17(.951) 506-5100 Telephone Number CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 2 Version 1.3 Jurisdiction This certification does not apply. This certification is applicable. Specific CDBG Certifications The Entitlement Community certifies that: Citizen Participation -- It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105. Community Development Pian -- Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and Tong -term community development objectives that provide decent housing, expand economic opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income. (See CFR 24 570.2 and CFR 24 part 570) Following a Plan -- It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria: 11. Maximum Feasible Priority - With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); 12. Overall Benefit - The aggregate use of CDBG funds including section 108 guaranteed loans during program year(s) 2013, 2014, 2015, (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two, or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period; 13. Special Assessments - It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate -income (not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force -- It has adopted and is enforcing: 14. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 15. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction; CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 3 Version 1.3 Compliance With Anti -discrimination laws -- The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. Lead -Based Paint -- Its activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of part 35, subparts A, 8, 3, K and R, of title 24; Compliance with Laws -- It will comply with applicable laws. Signature/Authorized Official Date Aaron Adams Name City Ma nacr Title 41000 Main Street Address Temecula, CA 92590 City/State/Zi p (951) 506-5100 Telephone Number CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 4 Version 1.3 Jurisdiction This certification does not apply. Ei This certification is applicable. OPTIONAL CERTIFICATION CDBG Submit the following certification only when one or more of the activities in the action plan are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specified in 24 CFR 570.208(c): The grantee hereby certifies that the Annual Plan includes one or more specifically identified CDBG-assisted activities, which are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. Signature/Authorized Official Date Aaron Adams Name City Manager_ Title 41000 Main Street Address Temecula, CA 92590 City/State/Zip (951) 506-5100 Telephone Number CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 5 Version 1.3 Jurisdiction This certification does not apply. This certification is applicable. Specific HOME Certifications The HOME participating jurisdiction certifies that: Tenant Based Rental Assistance -- If the participating jurisdiction intends to provide tenant -based rental assistance: The use of HOME funds for tenant -based rental assistance is an essential element of the participating jurisdiction's consolidated plan for expanding the supply, affordability, and availability of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing. Eligible Activities and Costs -- it is using and will use HOME funds for eligible activities and costs, as described in 24 CFR § 92.205 through 92.209 and that it is not using and will not use HOME funds for prohibited activities, as described in § 92.214. Appropriate Financial Assistance -- before committing any funds to a project, it will evaluate the project in accordance with the guidelines that it adopts for this purpose and will not invest any more HOME funds in combination with other Federal assistance than is necessary to provide affordable housing; Signature/Authorized Official Date Aaron Adams Name Cit Mana• er Title 41000 Main Street Address 1 Temecula, CA_92590 City/State/Zi p (951) 506-5100 Telephone Number CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 6 Version 1.3 Jurisdiction This certification does not apply. ❑ This certification is applicable. HOPWA Certifications The HOPWA grantee certifies that: Activities -- Activities funded under the program will meet urgent needs that are not being met by available public and private sources. Building -- Any building or structure assisted under that program shall be operated for the purpose specified in the plan: 1. For at least 10 years in the case of assistance involving new construction, substantial rehabilitation, or acquisition of a facility, 2. For at least 3 years in the case of assistance involving non -substantial rehabilitation or repair of a building or structure. Signature/Authorized Official Date Aaron Adams Name City Manager Title 41000 Main Street Address Temecula, CA 92590 City/State/Zip (951) 506-5100 Telephone Number CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 7 Version 1.3 Jurisdiction CO This certification does not apply. fl This certification is applicable. ESG Certifications I, Aaron Adams, Chief Executive Officer of Jurisdiction, certify that the local government will ensure the provision of the matching supplemental funds required by the regulation at 24 CFR 576.51. I have attached to this certification a description of the sources and amounts of such supplemental funds. I further certify that the local government will comply with: 1. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.53 concerning the continued use of buildings for which Emergency Shelter Grants are used for rehabilitation or conversion of buildings for use as emergency shelters for the homeless; or when funds are used solely for operating costs or essential services. 2. The building standards requirement of 24 CFR 576.55. 3. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.56, concerning assurances on services and other assistance to the homeless. 4. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.57, other appropriate provisions of 24 CFR Part 576, and other applicable federal laws concerning nondiscrimination and equal opportunity. 5. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.59(b) concerning the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. 6. The requirement of 24 CFR 576.59 concerning minimizing the displacement of persons as a result of a project assisted with these funds. 7. The requirements of 24 CFR Part 24 concerning the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988. 8. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.56(a) and 576.65(b) that grantees develop and implement procedures to ensure the confidentiality of records pertaining to any individual provided family violence prevention or treatment services under any project assisted with ESG funds and that the address or location of any family violence shelter project will not be made public, except with written authorization of the person or persons responsible for the operation of such shelter. 9. The requirement that recipients involve themselves, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, homeless individuals and families in policymaking, renovating, maintaining, and operating facilities assisted under the ESG program, and in providing services for occupants of these facilities as provided by 24 CFR 76.56. 10. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.57(e) dealing with the provisions of, and regulations and procedures applicable with respect to the environmental review responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and related imE CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications Jurisdiction authorities as specified in 24 CFR Part 58. 11. The requirements of 24 CFR 576.21(a)(4) providing that the funding of homeless prevention activities for families that have received eviction notices or notices of termination of utility services will meet the requirements that: (A) the inability of the family to make the required payments must be the result of a sudden reduction in income; (B) the assistance must be necessary to avoid eviction of the family or termination of the services to the family; (C) there must be a reasonable prospect that the family will be able to resume payments within a reasonable period of time; and (D) the assistance must not supplant funding for preexisting homeless prevention activities from any other source. 12. The new requirement of the McKinney-Vento Act (42 USC 11362) to develop and implement, to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, policies and protocols for the discharge of persons from publicly funded institutions or systems of care (such as health care facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions) in order to prevent such discharge from immediately resulting in homelessness for such persons. I further understand that state and local governments are primarily responsible for the care of these individuals, and that ESG funds are not to be used to assist such persons in place of state and local resources. 13. HUD's standards for participation in a local Homeless Management Information System (HMIs) and the collection and reporting of client -level information. I further certify that the submission of a completed and approved Consolidated Plan with its certifications, which act as the application for an Emergency Shelter Grant, is authorized under state and/or local law, and that the Local government possesses legal authority to carry out grant activities in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Signature/Authorized Official Date Aaron Adams Name City Manager Title 41000 Main Street Address Temecula, CA 92590 City/State/Zip (951) 506-5100 _ Telephone Number CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 9 Version 1.3 Jurisdiction El This certification does not apply. El This certification is applicable. APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS Instructions Concerning Lobbying and Drug -Free Workplace Requirements Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Drug -Free Workplace Certification 1. By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the grantee is providing the certification. 2. The certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowingly rendered a false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act, HUD, in addition to any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug -Free Workplace Act. 3. Workplaces under grants, for grantees other than individuals, need not be identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified in the grant application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the time of application, or upon award, if there is no application, the grantee must keep the identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make the information available for Federal inspection. Failure to identify all known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements. 4. Workplace identifications must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations). 5. If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the grant, the grantee shall inform the agency of the change(s), if it previously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph three). 6. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Check if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here. The certification with regard to the drug-free workplace is required by 24 CFR part 21. Place Name Street Cly . County State Zip City of Temecula 41000 Main Street I Temecula Riverside CA 92590 7. Definitions of terms in the Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment common rule and Drug -Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantees' attention is called, in particular, to the following definitions from these rules: "Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in Schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and as further defined by regulation (21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15); "Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes; "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non -Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use, or possession of any CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications Version 1.3 Jurisdiction controlled substance; "Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in the performance of work under a grant, including: a. All "direct charge" employees; b. all "indirect charge" employees unless their impact or involvement is insignificant to the performance of the grant; and c. temporary personnel and consultants who are directly engaged in the performance of work under the grant and who are on the grantee's payroll. This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the grantee (e.g., volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the grantee's payroll; or employees of su breci pients or subcontractors in covered workplaces) . Note that by signing these certifications, certain documents must completed, in use, and on file for verification. These documents include: 1. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing 2. Citizen Participation Plan 3. Anti -displacement and Relocation Plan Signature/Authorized Official Aaron Adams Name City Manager Title 41000 Main Street Address Temecula, CA 92590 City/State/Zip (951) 506-5100 Telephone Number Date CPMP Non -State Grantee Certifications 11 Version 1.3 Appendix B. SF 424 Form Complete the fillable fields (blue cells) in the table below. The other items are pre -filled with values from the Grantee Information Worksheet ■ ate Submitted 5/15/15 L • •licant Identifier Type of Submission Date Received by state State Identifier ' ..lication _ Pre -application ■ate Received by HUD Federal Identifier @ Construction 10 Construction _ Non Construction ❑ Non Construction • •licant Information urisdiction City of Temecula UOG Code Street Address Line 1 41000 Main Street anizational DUNS 618848253 Street Address Line 2 FAganizational Unit City of Temecula 'Department Community Development Cit Temecula California ZIP 92590 Country U.S.A. Division Planning Em.lo er Identification Number E1N : Coun Riverside 33-0383649 Program Year Start Date (MM/DD) 07/01 Specify Other Type if necessary: pplicant Type: Local Government Specify Other Tyke rogram Funding U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers; Descriptive Title of Applicant Project(s); Areas Affected by Project(s) (cities, Counties, localities etc.); Estimated Funding Community Development Block Grant 14.218 Entitlement Grant CDBG Project Titles CDBG entitlement to be used for public improvements, public services, and program administration to improve the living environment of lower income families Description of Areas Affected by CDBG Project(s) Low/mod census tracts located within the city $CDBG Grant Amount $540,214 $Addlitional HUD Grant(s) LeveragedDescribe $Additional Federal Funds Leveraged $Additional State Funds Leveraged $Locally Leveraged Funds $Grantee Funds Leveraged $Anticipated Program Income $ Other (Describe) Total Funds Leveraged for CDBG-based Project(s) Home Investment Partnerships Program 14.239 HOME HOME Project Titles Description of Areas Affected by HOME Project(s) $HOME Grant Amount ;$Additional HUD Grant(s) LeveragedDescribe $Additional Federal Funds Leveraged $Additional State Funds Leveraged Q. 4 * 11111111 * i; SF 424 6. . The SF 424 is part of the CPMP Annual Action Plan. SF 424 form r* fields are included in this document. Grantee information is linked '16/ Dc-vc,n from the 1 CPMP.x1s document f h CPMP tool. o the SF 424 Page 1 Version 2.0 $Locally Leveraged Funds I$Grantee Funds Leveraged $Anticipated Program Income Other (Describe) otal Funds Leveraged for HOME-based Project(s) Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS 14.241 HOPWA HOPWA Project TitlesDescription of Areas Affected by HOPWA Project(s) $HOPWA Grant Amount $Additional HUD Grant(s) Leveraged Describe w, Additional Federal Funds Leveraged Additional State Funds Leveraged e Locally Leveraged Funds $Grantee Funds Leveraged $Anticipated Program Income Other (Describe) otal Funds Leveraged for HOPWA-based Project(s) Emergency Shelter Grants Program 14.231 ESG ESG Project Titles Description of Areas Affected by ESG Project(s) $ESG Grant Amount $Additional HUD Grant(s) Leveraged Describe $Additional Federal Funds Leveraged ISAdditional State Funds Leveraged %Locally Leveraged Funds `1$Grantee Funds Leveraged 'Other (Describe) $Anticipated Program Income otal Funds Leveraged for ESG-based Project(s) Cone res Tonal Districts of: Is application subject to review by state Executive Order 12372 Process? A. plicant Districts Project Districts Is the applicant delinquent on any federal debt? If "Yes" please include an additional document explaining the situation. 0 Yes This application was made available to the 1 state E0 12372 process for review on DATE 0 No 1 Program is not covered by EO 12372 Program has not been selected by the state for review • Yes Fit No ►I1 N/A Person to be contacted regarding this application First Name: Dana Middle Initial itle: Associate Planner eMail: dana.weavera7ciytoftemecula.org Signature of Authorized Representative Last Name: Weaver Phone: (951) 693-3928 Fax: (951) 694-6477 Grantee Website: www.cityoftemecula.org 'Other Contact aron Adams, City Manager Date Signed SF 424 Page 2 Version 2.0 Appendix C. Listing of Proposed Projects Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Sam Hicks Monument Park Pla around Res acement Description: IDIS Project #: 11 UOG Code: Design and construct a new playground structure to replace the existing dilapidated play equipment at Sam Hicks Park. Project includes removal of old equipment, and installation of new equipment, and resurfacing according to ADA Guidelines. CDBG funds will be used for project delivery administration, design and construction costs. Location: Priority Need Category 41970 Moreno Road, Temecula, CA 92590 / Census Tract: 432.15 Select one: Public Facilities Explanation: Expected Completion Date: CDBG National Objective: LMA -Provide 1368 LMI persons (79.9°I° of service area} with new playground structure. 12/ '/2015 Q Decent Housing Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity a Specific Objectives Fund Source: v Outcome II ❑ Categories Availability/Accessibility Affordability Sustainability 1 Improve quality increase quantity of neighborhood facilities for low-income persons 3 Project -level Accomplishments 11 Public Facilities Proposed 1 1 01 People v Proposed_ 1360 Underway 0 Underway Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Com ' lete Accompl. Type: 7 Complete 0 Accompl. Type: V Proposed 11 Public Facilities v Proposed 1 Underway Underway Complete Complete 0 Accompl. Type: v Proposed 11 Public Facilities v Proposed 1 Underway Underway 1 CompleteComplete Pro . osed outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Sustainability.Suitable Living Envronment 03F Parks, Recreational Facilities 570.201(c) V 03F Parks, Recreational Facilities 570.201(c) 03F Parks, Recreational Facilities 570.201(c) w 03F Parks, Recreational Facilities 570.201(c) Matrix Codes Matrix Codes r IProgram Year 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 50,000 Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 0 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 11 Public Facilities v Proposed Units 1 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units 0 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: 7 Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (1) 1 CPMP IProgram Year 4 1 Program Year 3 1 Program Year 2 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 125,000 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 0 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed � Fund Source: v Pro i osed Amt. Actual Amount 11 Public Facilities v Proposed Units 1 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units D Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG v Proposed Amt. 311,550 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 16,754 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount _ Actual Amount 11 Public Facilities v Proposed Units 1 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG v Proposed Amt. 122,338 Fund Source: r Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v : Proposed Amt. Fund Source: V : Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 1360 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: 7 Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 1 Program Year 5 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v► Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (1) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula -PMP Version 2.0 Project Name: I Old Town Sidewalk Improvement Project Description: IDIS P roj act #: UOG Code: 1 Design and construct two new segments of sidewalk in the old Town District, including complete curb and gutter installation and improved accessibility according to ADA Guidelines. CDBG funds will be used for project delivery administration, project design and construction costs. Location: Priority Need Category Old Town Front Street and Fifth Street, Temecula, CA 92590 /Select Census Tract: 512 one: Infrastructure t I Explanation: CDBG National Objective: LMA - Provide 1255 LMI persons (60.05% of service area) with new sidewalk infrastructure. Expected Completion Date: 12/ ,2115 _ Decent I- ousiF.0 Suitable Living Environment . Economic opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome ❑ LI categories Availability/Accessibility Affordability Sustainability 1 Improve quality / increase quantity of public improvements for lower income persons V 2 3 V Project -level Accomplishments 01 People v Proposed 1255 Accompl. Type: i. Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Accompl. Type= lir Accompl. Type: v Proposed Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Accompl. Type: v Accompl. Type: v Proposed Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Proposed Outcome _ Performance Measure Actual Outcome Sustainability Suitable Living Environment 03L Sidewalks 570.201(c) V Matrix Codes Matrix Codes w Matrix Codes v Matrix Codes w Matrix Codes lProgram Year 1 Fund Source: v Pro . osed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: 7 Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Accompl. Type: i ,Proposed Units Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (2) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v , Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl.- Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 1 Program Year 5 l Program Year 4 1 Program Year 3 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: 7 Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v IPosed Units Accompl. Type: m' Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG v Proposed Amt. 353,645 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source : v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 1255 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units _ Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units vi Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: I v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: ♦ Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl, Type: Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units 'Actual Units Project (2) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula `PMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Critical Home Maintenance & Re •airs Program Description. IDIS Project : UOG Code: The program provides preventative home maintenance and critical home repair services to low-income homeowners. CDBG funds will be used for Habitat for Humanity program administration costs (salaries and benefits}. Location: Priority Need Category Habitat. . Valley 27475 _ Road, _390, Temecula, CA 92590 Select one: Owner Occupied Housing 7 Explanation: National objective: LMH Expected - Date:CDBG 2115 Y !' .YFi Decent Housing o Suitable Living Environment Economic Opportunity Specific objectives outcome Categories ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability Q Sustainability 1 Improve the quality of owner housing T 3, Project-level Accomplishments 10 Housing Units Proposed 170 Accompl. Type: w► Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete - • � • • Accompl. Type: �► 14 Hauling Units � Proposed 15 Underway Underway Complete Complete Proposed Accompl. Type: v Accompl. Type: Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Pro . osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Sustainability Decent Housing 14A Rehab; Single -Unit Residential 570.202 w Matrix Codes 7' J 14A Rehab; Single -Unit Residential 570.202 w Matrix Codes r L Matrix Codes v Matrix Codes T IProgram Year 1 Fund Source: vProposed Amt. Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: `Proposed Amt. Fund Source: yProposed_Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v . Pro osed 1l n its Accompl. . T YP e : 'Proposed Units p Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units !Actual Units Actual Units Project (3) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Amt. Fund Source: v Pro 'osed Amt. `Proposed Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 3 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 26,223 Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 10 Housing Units v Proposed Units 170 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 4 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 26,223 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: 7 Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 10 Housing Units v Proposed Units 15 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 1 Program Year 5 1 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Ni► Pro osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (3) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Solar Affordable Housing Program Description: IDIS Project #: UOG Code: The program provides purchase and installation of photovoltaic solar systems to low-income homeowners. CDBG funds will be used for GRID Alternatives program administration costs (salaries and benefits). Location: Priority Need Category GRID Alternatives 1257 Columbia Ave., Suite D5,Owner Riverside, CA 92507 Select one: Occupied Housing v Explanation: CDBG National Objective: LMH Expected Completion Date: (n_LivicAy v ... f .. [0 Decent Housing 0 Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome Categories ❑ Availability/Accessibility Q Affordability 0 Sustainability 1 Improve the quality of owner housing v 2 - 3 w tin_ _ 0 s u _ 3D'W E L O. 3 a 10 Housing Units v Proposed 3 Accompl. Type: t Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete 10 Housing Units v Proposed 2 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Com . lete Accompl. Type: v Proposed Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Pro . osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Affordability Decent Housing 14F Energy Efficiency Improvements 570.202 V Matrix Codes 14F Energy Efficiency Improvements 570.202 V Matrix Codes t Matrix Codes V Matrix Codes V IProgram Year 1 Fund Source: r► Proposed Amt. Fund Source: vr Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: 1► Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (4) 1 CPMP Program Year 4 Program Year 3 Program Year 2 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 1 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 1 _I Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People V Proposed Units Accompl. Type: t ' Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG wr► Proposed Amt. 15,873 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. AmountActual Actual Amount 10 Housing Units v Proposed Units 3 Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: vProposed Units Accompl. Type: w Pro i osed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG V Proposed i Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. _ Actual Amount Actual Amount 10 Housing Units v Proposed Units Z Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 5 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. ' Fund Source: vPropvsed Amt. 'Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: vPrvposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl, Type: v Proposed Unit Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v I Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v w Proposed Units Actual UnitsActual Units Project (4) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.6 Project Name: Fair Housing Services Description: IDIS Project #: UOG Code: The Fair Housing Council of Riverside County program provides fair housing education, training, & enforcement programs for low income households. CDBG funds will be used for staff salaries and benefits and other operations costs. Location: Priority Need Category Fair Housing Council of Riverside County 3933 Mission Inn Avenue, Riverside CA 92501 Select one: Public Services 7 Explanation: CDBG National Objective: LMC Expected Completion Date: 06/ 242 15 0 Decent Housing ® Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome ❑ LJ Categories Availability/Accessibility Affordability Sustainability 1 Improve the services for low/mod income persons V 3 Project -level Accomplishments vo v g g ii CD CD 10 1 1 Proposed 300 01 People v Proposed 160 Underway Underway Complete Complete Proposed 300 Proposed Accompl. Type: v Underway Underway Complete Complete Proposed 330 Proposed Accompl. Type: v Underway Underway Complete Complete Pro ' osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual outcome Availability/Accessibility Suitable Living Environment 21D Fair Housing Activities (subject to 20% Admin cap) 570.20( V 053 Fair Housing Activities (if CDBG, then subject to 570.201(e) V 21D Fair Housing Activities (subject to 20% Admin cap) 570.20( V Matrix Codes 05] Fair Housing Activities (if CDBG, then subject to 570.201(e) V Matrix Codes Program Year 1 I CDBG v Proposed Amt. 10,000 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 9,999 Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount ,Actual Amount Accompl. - Proposed Units Proposed Units_ 1 300 01 People v Actual Units Actual Units Type:Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Nor Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units _Accompl. Project (5) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 CDBG Proposed Amt. 10,040 Fund Source: v : Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 10,000 Actual Amount Fund Source: vProposed Amt. Fund Source: 7 Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 300 Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Accompl, Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Program Year CDBG 'v Proposed Amt. 16,321 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 16,321 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 330 Accompl. Type: ir _i Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 1Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units7 Accompl. Type: Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 5 I Program Year 4 CDBG v 1 Proposed Amt. 10 000 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People Proposed Units 160 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: ♦ Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units J Actual Units Accompl. Type:v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units .-- Actual Units Project (5) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: G . eration School Bell Description: IDIS Project #: _ UOG Code: 11,400 11,400 The Assistance League of Temecula Valley program provides clothes and school supplies to children from low income families. CDBG funds will provide clothing for children. Location: Priority Need Categor Assistance League 28720 Via Montezuma, Temecula, CA 92590 / Census Tract: 512 Select one. Public Services Explanation: CDBG Nationa I Gbjecti Ve : LM C Expected Completion Date: 06.15 a Decent Housing Suitable Living Environment o Economic Opportunity Specific objectives Outcome Categories ❑ Availability/Accessibility [] Affordability ❑ Sustainability 1 Improve the services for low/mod income persons 2 _ 3 Project -level Accomplishments 01 People v Proposed 131 01 People v Proposed 64 v Underway Underway Accompl, Type: Complete Proposed Units Complete 114 Accompl. Type: v Proposed 01 People v Proposed 65 Proposed Units Underway Accompl. Type: Underway Complete Complete :83 Accompl. Type: v Proposed 01 People v Proposed 200 Underwa Underway Complete Complete 134 Pro . osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Affordability Suitable Living Environment 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) 05D Youth Services 570.201(e) . 1. V 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) Matrix Codes V 05D Youth Services 570.201(e) Matrix Codes Program Year 1 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 11,400 11,400 ` Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Pro . osed Units 131 Accompl, Type: v w Proposed Units Actual Units 114 rActualUnits I Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Actual Units 'Actual Units Project (6) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 CDBG Proposed Amt. 10,190 1 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 10,190 Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People p v Proposed Units 6 5 Accompl. . T p Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units 83 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 3 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 16,321 1 Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 16,321 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People vProposed Units 200 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units 134 Actual Units Accompl. Type: VPrvpvsed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 4 J CDBG myPrvpvsed Amt. 7,892 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual AmountActual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 64 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Unitsv p Accompl. Type: Proposed Units lActual Units , Actual Units . IProgram Year 5 Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl, Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (6) 2 CPMP CPMP Version 2.0 Grantee Name: City of Temecula Proiect Name: Domestic Violence Services Program Description: Safe Alternatives violence and IDIS Project : UOG Code: vProposed Amt. for Everyone (S.A.F.E.) program provides a provision of services to at -risk youth and families to avoid abuse. CDBG funds will be used for staff salaries and benefits. Location: Priority Need Category Fund Source: SAFE 28910 Pujol Street, Temecula, CASelect 92590 / Census Tract: 512 one: Public Services v Explanation: Fund Source: Expected Completion Date: CDBG National Objective: LMC 05/ 21 15 0 Decent Housing ® Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Actual Amount Outcome Categories Eii Availability/Accessibility El Affordability ❑ Sustainability 1 Improve the services for low/mod income persons Actual Amount 'i` 2 v► Pro . osed Units 3�_v 250 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Project -level Accomplishments 01 People r Proposed 250 Actual Units 01 People v Proposed 131 Proposed Units !Underway Underway w . Proposed Units Complete 172 Complete Actual Units 01 People v Proposed 75 1 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete 220 Complete 01 People v Proposed 200 Accompl. Type: w Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Pro . osed outcome Performance Measure Actual outcome Availability/Accessibility Suitable Living Environment 05G Battered and Abused Spouses 570.201(e) 05G Battered and Abused Spouses 570.201(e) 05G Battered and Abused Spouses 570.201(e) Matrix Codes Matrix Codes Matrix Codes 1 Program Year 1 I CDBG vProposed Amt. 11,400 Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 11,400 Actual Amount Fund Source: lrProposed Amt. Fund Source: 7 Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v► Pro . osed Units 250 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units 172 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w . Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (7) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 CDBG mr Proposed Amt. 10,190 Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 10,190 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v p Proposed Units 75 Accompl. Type: P YP w Proposed Units Actual Units 220 Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units ,fit► Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 3] CDBG v Proposed Amt. 16,321 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. _ Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount _ I Actual Amount 01 People w Proposed Units 200 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 5 1 Program Year 4 CDBG w Pro osed Amt. 7892 Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 131 Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type:w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accomp IT : w Type: . Proposed Units Accompl. . T Y� : p w Proposed Units 1 Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (7) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Before and After School Care for Kids Description: Boys & Girls Clubs of youth. CDBG funds IDIS Project #: UOG Code: Southwest County program provides before and after school care for underserved low income will be used for program "scholarships" to reduce child care costs for families. Location: 1 Priority Need Category Boys & Girls Club 28790 Pujol Street, Temecula, 92590 / Census Tract: 512 CASelect one: Public Services wr ' Explanation: Expected Completion Date: CDBG National Objective: LMC 06/.2 15 r t ry o Decent Housing Suitable Living I 0 Economic Opportunity Environment Specific Objectives Outcome ❑ Categories Availability/Accessibility Affordability Sustainability 1 Improve the services for low/mod income persons 2, El ❑ 3 Project -level Accomplishments 01 People v Proposed 40 01 People v Proposed 15 Underway Underway Com ■ lete 32 Complete 01 People v Proposed 35 Accompl. Type: V Proposed Underway Complete 23 Underway Complete 01 People v Proposed 100 Accompl. Type: 'v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Pro ' osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual outcome Affordability Suitable Living Environment 05D Youth Services 570.201(e) M V Matrix Codes vr 05D Youth Services 570.201(e) w Matrix Codes w 05D Youth Services 570.201(e) V Matrix Codes v Program Year 1 CDBG V Proposed Amt. 11,400 1 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 11,400 Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Y Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units- 40 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units 32 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (8) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 10.190 Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 10,190 Actual Amount Fund Source: v J Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v ; Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 35 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl, Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 3 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 16,321 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Pro osed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 100 Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 4 CDBG r Proposed Amt. 7,892 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People w Proposed Units 15 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 1 Program Year 5 1 Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units 1 Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (8) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: SMURF Childcare and Adult Education Pro• ram Description: IDIS Project #: UOG Code: The Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF) program provides support for underserved low-income youth and single mothers through a provision of fellowship and training programs. CDBG funds will be used for consultant services and program supplies. Location: Priority Need Category SMURF 41919 Moreno Dr. Suite D,Select Temecula, CA 92590 / Census Tract: 512 one: Public Services v Explanation: Expected Completion Date: CDBG National Objective: LMC 06/ ! 2 15 0 Decent Housing Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity Specific objectives Outcome Categories 1 Improve the services for low/mod income persons V Availability/Accessibility LI Affordability 2 ❑ Sustainability 3- v Project -level Accomplishments 01 People v Pro ' osed 40 01 People v Proposed 58 Underway Underwa Complete Complete 153 01 People v Proposed 35 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete 222 01 People v Proposed 60 Accompl. Type: V Proposed Underway Underwa Complete Complete Pro . osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Availability/Accessibility Suitable Living Environment 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) V 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) 1r Matrix Codes i 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) w Matrix Codes 1 Program Year 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 11,400 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 11,127 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units 01 People v Proposed Units 401 I Actual Units Actual Units 153 . Type: v I Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed UnitsAccompl Actual Units Actual Units 1 Project (9) 1 CPMP 1 Program Year 5 1 Program Year 4 1 Program Year 3 l Program Year 2 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 10,190 Fund Source: Y `Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 10,190 Actual Amount Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: t Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 35 Accompl. Type; Y Proposed Units Actual Units 222 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG v Proposed Amt. 16,321 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v = Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units • 0 Accompl. Type: t Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: myProposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG Y Proposed Amt. 7,892 Fund Source: vProposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Pro ' osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 58 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v ,l Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units 'Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. { I Fund Source: Pro osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Pro i osed Amt. i Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (9) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Emere ency Food/Tem •orar Assistance for Need Families Description: IDIS Project #: UOG Code: The Senior Cititzens Service Center program provides food and supplies to low-income families, and individuals who are homeless and at -risk of homelessness. CDBG funds will be used for food and operation costs. Location: Priority Need Category Senior Citizens Service Center 41538 Eastman Drive, Unit B & C,Select Murrieta, CA 92562 / Census Tract: 512 one: N Public Services w Explanation: Expected Completion Date: CDBG National Objective: LMC 06/ 15 a Decent Housing ® Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome Categories Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability LI Sustainability Improve the services for low/mod income persons 2 3 Project -level Accomplishments 01 People v Proposed 2200 Accompl. Type: v r Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete 934 01 People v Proposed 382 Accompl. Type: w Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete 798 01 People v Proposed 1060 Accompl. Type: VProposed Underway Underway Com . iete Complete Pro i osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Availability/Accessibility Suitable Living Environment Continuum of Care 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) V Matrix Codes v 1 — 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) w Matrix Codes 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) v Matrix Codes IProgram Year 1 CDBG ' Proposed Amt. 11,400 Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 11,400 Fund Source: Nor Proposed Amt. Fund Source: r , Proposed Amt. _ Actual Amount Actual Amount _ 01 People V Prima posed Units 2200 Accompl. Type: t Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 934 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: 7 Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (10) 1 CPMP 1 Program Year 5 1 Program Year 4 f Program Year 3 1 Program Year 2 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 10,190 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 10,190 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. — Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 382 Accompl. Type: V Proposed i Actual Units 798 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v ' Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: t Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: NIr Proposed Units Accompl, Type: 7 Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG v Proposed Amt. 7,892 Fund Source: 7 Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 1050 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v ; Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v ° Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units ! Accompl. Type, "Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (10) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Circle of Care Food Minist Description: IDIS Pro'ect #: UOG Code: _ Tee VNW Circle of Care program provides bi-weekly food box distribution to low-income families, ani individuals who are homeless and at -risk of homelessness. CDBG funds will be used for operation costs. Location: Priority Need Category VNW Circle of Care 27711 Diaz Road, Temecula CA 92590 / Census Tract: 512 Select one: �' Public Services v Explanation: CDBG National Objective: LMC Expected Completion Date: o Decent Housing Suitable Living Environment o Economic opportunity s ecific objectives p ] Outcome Categories i Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability II Sustainability 1 Improve the services for low�mod income persons 2 3 _ Project -level Accomplishments 01 People v Proposed 410 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete 254 01 People v Accompl. Type: v J Proposed 120 Proposed _ Underway Underway Complete Complete Accompl. Type: v Accompl. Type: V Proposed Proposed Underway Underway Complete Com Tete Pro ' osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Availability/Accessibility Suitable Living Environment Continuum of Care 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) w Matrix Codes 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) V► Matrix Codes Matrix Codes 'w Matrix Codes 1 Program Year 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: N► Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units \ Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: vProposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (11) 1 CPMP 1 Program Year 5 1 Program Year 4 I Program Year 3 1 Program Year 2 CDBG 1r Proposed Amt. 10,190 I Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 10,190 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount ; Actual Amount 01 People Proposed Units 410 Accompl. Type: i Proposed Units Actual Units 254 Actual Units Accompl. Type: Pro ' osed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG _ Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG v Proposed Amt. 7,892 Fund Source: 1► Pro ' osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 120 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: ♦ Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: 'v Proposed Units Accompl, Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (11) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Temecula Communit Pantr Description: The Temecula Community homeless and at -risk • IDIS Project #: UOG Code: Pantry program provides food and supplies to low-income families, and individuals who are of homelessness. CDBG funds will be used for operation costs. Location: Priority Need Category Temecula Community Pantry 28922 Pujol Street, Temecula, CASelect 92591 / Census Tract: 512 one: Public Services Explanation: Expected Completion Date: CDBG National Objective: LMC 06/ . _15 0 Decent Housing Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome Categories Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability 1 Improve the services for low/mod income persons v 2 3 v Project-level Accomplishments 01 People v Proposed 715 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underwa Complete Complete Accompl. Type: v Proposed Accompl. Type: v► Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Accompl. Type: v Proposed Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway ' (Complete Complete Pro.osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Availability/Accessibility Suitable Living Environment / Continuum of Care 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) V Matrix Codes e Matrix Codes V Matrix Codes '► Matrix Codes ' '' Matrix Codes Program Year 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People V Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v I Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: r Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (12) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 CABG v Pro ' osed Amt. Fund Source: v 'Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount J _ Actual Amount 01 People p �I Proposed Units Accompl. Type: p yP w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units r Actual Units Program Year 3 CDBG v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v i Proposed Amt. Actual Amount !Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units _ Actual Units Actual Units Accompl, Type: 7 Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units LProgram Year 5 Program Year 4 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 7,892 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 715 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v ; Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Pro osed Units Accompl. Type: 7 Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: t Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (12) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Inclement Weather Shelter Program Description: IDIS Project #: UOG Code: The Community Mission of Hope program provides temporary shelter and a provision of services to individuals who are homeless. CDBG funds will be used for operation costs. Location: Priority Need Category Community Mission of Hope 41680 Enterprise Circle South,Select Suite C, Temecula, CA 92591 Census Tract: 512 one: Public Services v Explanation: CDBG National Objective: LMC Expected Completion Date: 06r '2( 1 0 Decent Housing ® Suitable Living Environment Q Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome 111 ❑ II Categories Availability/Accessibility Affordability Sustainability 1 End chronic homelessness w 2 v 3 v Project -level Accomplishments n n a 3 3 -o g (D 1 4 4 Proposed 30 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete i Complete Accompl. Type: v Proposed Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Proposed Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Pro • osed outcome Performance Measure Actual outcome Availability/Accessibility Continuum of Care 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) v Matrix Codes v Matrix Codes Matrix Codes Matrix Codes Matrix Codes IProgram Year 1 I CDBG v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People w !' Pro osed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (13) 1 CPMP N L 0i E L 0 a CDBG v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount - 01 People ' Proposed Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units CDBG v Proposed Amt. 7 892 Actual Amount Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 30 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: 1► Proposed Units Actual Units Fund Source: V Fund Source V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Proposed Units Actual Units Fund Source: Fund Source: Actual Amount Accompl. Type: Accompl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Proposed Units Actual Units Fund Source: Fund Source: Accompl. Type: Actual Amount v Proposed Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Project (13) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Project Name: Just Add One Description: The City of Temecula local workforce employer operation costs and IDIS Project #: UOG Code: program provides job skills training to low-income youth through a provision of workshops and connections. CDBG funds will be used for staff administration costs and program/workshop supplies. Location: Priority Need Category City of Temecula Economic DevelopmentPublic 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92591 / Census Tract: 512 Select one: Services — Explanation: Expected Completion Date: CDBG National Objective: LMC 06/ 0,y,._ 115 Decent Housing o Suitable Living Economic opportunity Fund Source: Environment Specific Objectives Outcome Categories 1 Improve economic opportunities for low-income persons 1 Availability/Accessibility 21 El Affordability ❑ Sustainability 3 Actual Amount _ 01 People v Proposed Units Project -level Accomplishments 01 People v Proposed 55 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Actual Units Underway Accompl. Type: Underway Proposed Units Complete Accompl, Type: Complete Proposed Units Accompl. Type: 7 Proposed 1 Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Accompl. Type: v Proposed I. Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underway Complete Complete Proposed Outcome Performance Measure _ Actual Outcome 'Mailability/Accessibility Economic Opportunity 05 Public Services (General) 570.201(e) Matrix Codes Matrix Codes Matrix Codes Matrix Codes Matrix Codes 791r lProgram Year 1 CDBG w Proposed Amt. ! Fund Source: v ; Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units { Actual Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl, Type: 7 Proposed Units Actual Units 1 Actual Units Project (14) 1 CPMP Program Year 2 CDBG v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. _ Fund Source: V Proposed Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units _ Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 3 CDBG v Pr2posed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt Actual Amount Actual Amount 1 Fund Source: vProposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 1 Program Year 5 1 Program Year 4 1 CDBG v Proposed Amt. 7,892 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: i Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People v Proposed Units 55 Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: 7 Proposed Units Accompl. Type: Proposed Units 1 Actual Units Actual Units Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: r Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: r Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (14) 2 CPMP Grantee Name: City of Temecula CPMP Version 2.0 Proiect Name: Pro ram Administration Description: CDBG IDIS Project #: UOG Code: Proposed Amt. The planning and administration funding is intended to provide funding for general staff administration of CDBG programs and activities, including Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) training, program set-up, reporting, planning, and subrecipient training and monitoring. Location: Priority Need Category City of Temecula 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CASelect 92590 / Census Tract: 512 one: Planning/Administration w Actual Amount 85,106 Explanation: Expected Completion Date: (061_ 0 2 ' 15 [® Decent Housing 0 Suitable Living Environment 0 Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome Categories ❑ Availability/Accessibility ❑ Affordability ❑ Sustainability 1 w � s 3 w Project -level Accomplishments Other w Proposed Other v Proposed Underway Underway Other w Complete Complete Other Proposed Other w Proposed Actual Units Underway Accompl. Type: Underwa Proposed Units Complete Accompl. Type: Complete Proposed Units Other v Proposed Accompl. Type: v Proposed Underway Underwa Complete Complete Pro i osed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome 21A General Program Administration 570.206 w 21A General Program Administration 570.206 V 21A General Program Administration 570.206 Matrix Codes 21A General Program Administration 570.206 Matrix Codes w IProgram Year 1 I CDBG v Proposed Amt. 85,111 Fund Source: w i Proposed Amt. 1 Actual Amount 85,106 Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: v ; Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Other w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units ,Actual Units Actual Units Project (15) 1 CPMP Program Year 3 1 Program Year 2 CDBG w Proposed Amt. 93,439 Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 93,439 Actual Amount Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Other w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units CDBG w Proposed Amt. 108,814 Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 108,814 Actual Amount Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Other w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w . Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units Program Year 4 1 CDBG w Proposed Amt. 108,042 [ Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. Fund Source: Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Other w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units _ Actual Units - _ Actual Units IProgram Year 5 1 r Fund Source: w Proposed Amt. � I Fund Source: M w Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Fund Source: v Proposed Amt. Fund Source: 1 v ; Proposed Amt. Actual Amount lActual Amount _ Accompl. Type: w : Proposed Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Accompl. Type: w Proposed Units Accompl. Type: v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Project (15) 2 CPMP Appendix D. Table 3B Annual Affordable Housing Goals U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No. 2506-0117 (Exp. 8/31/2014) Table 3B ANNUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLETION GOALS Grantee Name: Program Year: Expected Annual Number of Units To Be Completed Actual Annual Number of Units Completed Resources used during the period CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA BENEFICIARY GOALS (Sec. 215 Only) Homeless households _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Non -homeless households ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Special needs households ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Total Sec. 215 Beneficiaries* ❑ ❑ ❑ El RENTAL GOALS (Sec. 215 Only) Acquisition of existing units 11 1j 11 Production of new units ❑ ❑ ❑ Rehabilitation of existing units ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rental Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ Total Sec. 215 Affordable Rental ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ HOME OWNER GOALS (Sec. 215 only) Acquisition of existing units ❑ ❑ Production of new units ■ ❑ Rehabilitation of existing units 17 / ❑ Homebuyer Assistance ❑ ❑ Total Sec. 215 Affordable Owner ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ COMBINED RENTAL AND OWNER GOALS (Sec. 215 Only) Acquisition of existing units ❑ ❑ ❑ Production of new units ❑ ❑ 0 Rehabilitation of existing units ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rental Assistance ❑ ❑ ■ Homebuyer Assistance ❑ ❑ ❑ Combined Total Sec. 215 Goals* ■ ❑ ❑ 0 OVERALL HOUSING GOALS (Sec. 215 + Other Affordable Housin:) Annual Rental Housing Goal ❑ ■ In 0 Annual Owner Housing Goal 17 ■ Total Overall Housing Goal ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ * The total amounts for "Combined Total Sec. 215 Goals" and "Total Sec. 215 Beneficiary Goals" should be the same number. Appendix E. Proof of Publication This page intentionally left blank Appendix F. Resolutions This page intentionally left blank Appendix G. City Maps CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Item No. 15 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: April 14, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve CR&R Residential Organics Recycling Program PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the proposed Residential Organics Recycling Program as presented; 2. Direct staff to incorporate the rate for the Residential Organics Recycling Program into Solid Waste and Recycling Schedule of Rates and Charges; 3. Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Franchise Agreement with CR&R to reflect the proposed program and recent legislation affecting solid waste disposal and recycling mandates. BACKGROUND: In 1991, the City entered into an exclusive franchise agreement with CR&R Inc. to provide for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for providing temporary bin/roll-off services in commercial, residential, construction, and industrial areas within the City of Temecula. The agreement is a seven-year evergreen contract that is automatically renewed annually for the next seven years. The agreement is periodically amended to reflect current legislation and changes in services. Recent legislation and local environmental concerns regarding organic waste has prompted the City to consider new methods for the processing of organic wastes in order to ensure the City is compliant with State mandates and to ensure the long term rate stability for its businesses and residents. The following provides additional background regarding State legislation and the proposed Residential Organics Recycling Program. Statewide Policies and Legislative Mandates: There are five legislative actions that drive the current and future solid waste and recycling efforts regarding organic waste diversion from landfills. 1. Assembly Bill 939: Required that cities and counties meet solid waste diversion goals of 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000. If these diversion goals are not met by a city, CalRecycle may impose administrative civil penalties up to $10,000 per day. 2. Assembly Bill 32: Requires California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 - a reduction of approximately 15 percent below emissions expected under a "business as usual" scenario. In response to Assembly Bill 32, the California Air Resources Board developed the Scoping Plan which contains the main strategies California will use to reduce the greenhouse gases that cause climate change. The Scoping Plan focuses on six major sectors: 1) transportation and fuels; 2) energy generation; 3) waste; 4) water; 5) natural lands; and 6) agriculture. 3. Assembly Bill 341: Requires that businesses that generate more than four cubic yards of commercial solid waste per week or is a multifamily residential dwelling of five units or more to arrange for recycling services, on and after July 1, 2012. AB 341 also set a declaration that it is the policy goal of the state that not less than 75% of solid waste generated be source reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020. 4. Assembly Bill 1826: Requires that on or after April 1, 2016, a business that generates eight cubic yards or more of organic waste per week shall arrange for recycling services specifically for organic waste. 5. Assembly Bill 1594: Commencing January 1, 2020, green waste material used as alternative daily cover (ADC) at landfills no longer constitutes diversion through recycling and shall be considered disposal. Commencing on August 1, 2018, local jurisdictions are required to report on how they intend to divert material being used as ADC. In addition to the legislative items mentioned above, the Riverside County Solid Waste Management Advisory Council (Countywide Local Task Force) has discussed various issues/impacts regarding pest/disease transmission, litter contamination, air quality and water quality as a result of the land application of non -composted organic material on vacant land and agricultural land. Discussions at the Countywide Local Task Force regarding this issue continue; however, discussions now narrowly focus on whether or not to: • Increase quality standards on non -composted green waste, or • Implement a future ban on all land application of non -composted green waste by 2020. It should be noted that there are only three permitted composting facilities in Riverside County and approximately 70-80% of green waste collected in Riverside County is used for land application, with the rest going to composting, alternative daily cover, and biomass conversions. If a ban were to go into effect, it is anticipated that there is not enough composting facility capacity or other outlets for green waste material within Riverside County to accommodate such a ban. Potential Impact to the City of Temecula: The City of Temecula residents generate approximately 14,000 tons of green waste per year. Of this waste, approximately 20% is used as alternative daily cover (ADC) and 80% is used for non -composted land application. As mentioned above, by year 2020 green waste will no longer count toward diversion if used as alternative daily cover, and there is the potential that non -composted green waste will not be allowed for land application on agricultural land, or at the least, more stringent regulations regarding the quality of the end product and land application will be implemented. Additionally, as other cities throughout California take action to find outlets for their green waste, composting facilities will reach their permitting capacity. This will result in the need to find suitable outlets for the organic material, which may include transporting green waste material farther distances away. These factors negatively impact he City's ability to meet its diversion goals as mandated by CalRecycle. Currently non -composted green waste used for land application is the least expensive means to divert green waste from the landfill and continue to receive diversion credit toward meeting State mandates, however, with looming environmental concerns regarding this practice, it is expected that the cost will increase as more stringent regulations are considered. The practice of using green waste as ADC at the landfills is the next least expensive practice, with a tipping fee surcharge of $1.40 per ton; however, pursuant to AB 1594, this practice will no longer help the City toward meeting is diversion mandates. The proposed Residential Organics Recycling Program would cost an additional $1.95 per parcel per month and will result in product that is environmentally preferred for land application and qualifies for full diversion credit toward meeting the State diversion mandates. Outreach and Public Response: In response to the CR&R proposal, the City prepared a newsletter article (in cooperation with CR&R) to obtain feedback from the residents regarding the CR&R proposed residential organics program. The newsletter article was circulated in December 2014. Since its published date, the City received five responses that were either in support of the program concept, posed questions regarding the type of organics that can be recycled, as well as questions regarding the type of container for temporarily storing food scraps. The City did not receive any comments opposed to the proposed program. City Sustainability Committee: On March 30, 2015, the City Sustainability Sub Committee (comprised of two City Council members plus one member of each of the City's Commissions) reviewed and discussed this issue. The Sub Committee discussed various issues including the possibility of CR&R providing compost to residents and City parks free of charge, the possibility of first right of refusal option for renewable compressed natural gas (RCNG) for the City's CNG fleet, the secondary or co -environmental benefits to the sub -region, consideration of a tiered rate structure for income qualified residents, and the need for a strong public education program. The Sub Committee voted 4-0 in support of the program and recommended staff bring forward the proposal to the City Council for their full consideration. Franchise Agreement Amendment and Annual Rate Adjustment: Should the City Council choose to implement the CR&R proposed residential organics recycling program, the existing Franchise Agreement with CR&R will need to be amended. The Franchise Agreement amendment will be brought to the City Council for consideration at a future Council meeting. Additionally, the proposed rate increase of $1.95 per parcel per month will need to be incorporated into Exhibit D of the Franchise Agreement (Schedule of Rates for Trash and Recycling), which undergoes an annual rate adjustment based on changes in County landfill tipping fees, Consumer Price Index and Diesel Fuel Index. The annual rate adjustment is currently in progress and the public notice for this process is scheduled to go out May 8, 2015, pursuant to Government Code Section 61115. Implementation of the Residential Organics Recycling Program: The first phase of the CR&R anaerobic digester facility is under construction with an anticipated completion date of late 2015; therefore, implementation of the program would commence January 1, 2016. Since the program would begin implementation midway through the fiscal year, the rate for FY 2015- 16 would be $0.975 per parcel per month and beginning in FY 2016-17, the rate would increase to $1.95 to reflect a full year of implementation. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City of Temecula General Fund. The CR&R solid waste and recycling rates are a pass-through rate to CR&R. The residential solid waste and recycling rates are collected on the tax rolls and deposited into Fund 194. The CR&R invoice is paid from this Fund. ATTACHMENTS: 1. CR&R Anaerobic Digester Q&A 2. City Newsletter CR&R Anaerobic Digester Q&A 1. What percentage of Temecula residential generated green waste material is currently used as Alternative Daily Cover (ADC), composted, and/or landfilled? The following is the current practice and breakdown of where Temecula's green waste material is delivered for recycling • ADC — approximately 20% • Composting — 0% • Land Application — 80% of the green waste material is cleaned and ground and used as mulch in various agricultural applications such as; citrus, avocado groves and vineyards • Landfill — 0% 2. Since AB 1826 specifically applies to commercial businesses, should organic recycling efforts be focused on implementing a commer6aD organics recycling program rather than a residential organics recycling program? Two laws have passed that phase out the current practice for handling organics starting in 2016 with the finaD implementation by 2020. AB1594 authored by Das Williams addressed the use of ADC and ABI 826 authored by Wesley Chesbro addressed organics in the commercial waste stream We will absolutely need to develop an organics recycling program for the commercial businesses that generate greater than 4 cubic yards of waste in order to divert it from the landfill and recycle the material as called for in AB1826. We anticipate that, in Temecula, this will be a subscription based service much like commingled recycling. These new services and associated rate structure can be easily added to our existing rate schedule. The new law has a phase-in period starting in 2016 for businesses that generate greater than 8 cubic yards per week of organic waste with full implementation by 2020. The phased in approach will provide time to develop the program and allow it to grow as the cubic yardage addressed by the legislation ratchets down from 8 to 4 cubic yard by 2020. AB1594 is more global in nature and will have an impact on both residential and commercial green waste that is used for ADC. Effective January 1, 2020 any green waste material delivered to a landfill as ADC will count as disposal and may be subject to the $1.40 tipping fee surcharge. As well, ADC will no longer count as diversion credit for the City's compliance with AB939 and its successor legislation. Both laws will require a change in the way we handle organic waste (food and green waste) going forward and we believe the construction of an anaerobic digester will ultimately be the most cost effective, environmentally intelligent and sustainable solution. As discussed previously, ADC will be phased out overtime, land application which is our current method of handling the majority of your green waste is under heavy scrutiny by the State Water Resources Board, the Riverside County Board of Supervisor's and Local Agricultural Operators. Traditional composting operations are extremely difficult if not impossible to permit in and around urban communities. 3. If the City chooses not to participate in the CR&R proposed residential organics waste program, where will residentiaD green waste end up? Will it be processed at the CR&R MRF in Perris and used as feed stock for the CR&R anaerobic digester? Will it be used as ADC at a landfill? Will it be diverted to a composting facility? The residential green waste will continue to be delivered to the markets listed in the response to question 2. However, we are very concerned about the availability of these markets for the continued diversion of green waste materials. We know short and mid-term that the ADC market will begin to be phased out as we move towards 2020. As well, the other markets such as land application are currently receiving additional regulations from CalRecycle (Title 14/27), the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and the State Water Resources Board which are moving to eliminate land application due to the potential infestation of pests and the potential risk to ground water. This is occurring today without the inclusion of food waste which will be required to be diverted from the landfill as called for in AB1826. The only viable option today for the food waste is for it to be processed through the Perris MRF and ultimately to be digested through the AD system. The Perris MRF currently processes the green waste material and MO continue to process the material for reuse. The material will not be available to be used in the AD system unless the City elects to participate in the facility because the current rate structure will not support the use of the new AD facility. As long as the other markets are available, CR&R will deliver the green waste to one of these facilities. Unfortunately, local food waste processors do not currently exist. If a compost facility becomes available, CR&R could deliver the material to this facility however there will be an increased in cost due to increased transportation and/or tipping fees. 4. The City is currently in compliance with the AB 939 50% reduction mandate. How will CR&R ensure the City will remain in compliance with AB 939 reduction mandates, if the City chooses not to participate in the CR&R proposed residential organic waste program? CR&R has and will continue to work to ensure that the City remains in compliance with the diversion requirements in AB939 and its successor legislation. Having said that, we believe we can only guarantee future compliance with the AD system, as the laws have and will continue to change on how we handle organic waste (green and food) going forward. As mentioned previously, the State has already passed two new laws AB1594 and AB1826 which dramatically change how this material will be handled. Green waste used as ADC will not count for diversion credit starting in 2020 so we will have to find another market for this material and AB1826 only applies additional pressure by requiring food waste to be diverted and recycled with only a few very limited, expensive and long distance markets available today. We believe there is substantial risk for all parties as the organics markets continue to get saturated and exceed current capacities at the limited markets that are currently available. 5. The CR&R proposed residential organics recycling program includes a cost to Temecula residents of an additional $2.00 per parcel per month (approximate). Does any portion of this additional residential rate offset the implementation cost of a future mandated commercial organics recycling program implemented by CR&R? No, the $1.95 per month is directly tied to the amount of material generated by the residents in the City. Commercial customers which generate yard and/or food waste will need to evaluate their individual] requirements and subsequently choose their respective service levels; just like the current practice for waste and recycling services. 6. What is the anticipated CR&R rate for businesses to arrange for commercial organics recycling program? We would need to meet with staff to develop a commerciaD organics management plan and rate structure. One straight forward option would be to take the commercial trash rates and substitute the landfill component with an AD component based on the rate per ton for the AD facility. We should begin to have some dialogue as soon as possible regarding establishing a commercial organics program and rate structure in order to comply with AB1826. 7. Provide a pro -forma analysis and justification for the additional proposed residential organics recycling rate. CR&R has attached a pro -forma with the costs associated with calculating the rate to the residents. CR&R will continue to pursue additional contracts until we meet capacity for Phase One. Once the Phase One capacity is committed or contracted, we then plan to move on to Phase 2, 3 and 4 as our cities as well as third parties (such as the City of LA) continue to sign-up for AD services. We would project an incremental cost increase over our proposed $1.95 per month with each phase, as our grants only cover Phase 1 ($5 million) and Phase 2 ($3 million). This is the same pricing (depending on hauling distance and tonnages) for all of CR&R's cities and that is why we are giving "first come first serve" priority pricing to our Cities. 8. Is there a time in the future when the proposed rate increase could be eliminated? No, since the operation will continue and the requirement for ongoing maintenance, labor and facility upgrades will continue. 9. Please explain the production and utilization of new fuel for the waste hauling fleet. Please include information as it relates to air quality, with the response. The AD facility will produce a bio -gas that will be upgraded through the gas clean-up system to pipeline ready Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) which has the capability to be burned in our waste and recycling collection trucks. CR&R has committed to replacing the balance of the diesel powered collection vehicles operating in Temecula to natural gas trucks capable of utilizing RNG. Currently, approximately 40% of the fleet has been transitioned to natural gas with the balance of the fleet due to be converted over the next few months. The production of the gas is completed at the AD facility and will be piped directly into the collection trucks through a slow -fill compressor system. The RNG captures the methane that is 20 times more damaging to the atmosphere then CO2 and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has determined that the carbon intensity of the gas is a negative 15 where as diesel is a positive 95. CARB measures the carbon emitted per unit of energy consumed. Utilizing this gas is actually carbon negative and meets alD current regulations from the SCAQMD and CARB., City of Temecula City Manager's Office 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 POSTAL CUSTOMER Temecula, CA PRSRTSTD ECRWSS U.S. POSTAGE PAID TEMECULA, CA PERMIT NO. 5 4 • SEMI-ANNUAL NEWSLETTER 1 PUBLISHED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA CONNECT WIITIHI THIS CIITY OF TEIMHECULA! facebook.com/cityoftemecula City of Tett cavernmtnGPmftos Yoe rjr�ani atlwn overronent City of Temecula Government https://www.facebook.com/cityoftemecula Old Town Temecula Community Theater https://www.facebook.com/OTTCT Pennypickle's Workshop - Children's Museum https://www.facebook.com/pennypicklesworkshop Temecula Valley Entrepreneur's Exchange https://www.facebook.com/TemeculaValley EntrepreneursExchange Human Services - Special Needs https://www.facebook.com/pages/City-of-Temecula- Human-Services-Special-NeedsYouth-Services/ 489879954366882 Good Day Temecula https://www.facebook.com/Good-Day-Temecula Temecula Eats https://www.facebook.com/TemeculaEats City of Temecula Website: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/ City of Temecula Events: http://temeculaevents.org/ City of Temecula Outreach: http://temeculaoutreach.org/ You YouTube youtube.com/cityoftemecula Twitter twitter.com/cityoftemecula LfJ Instagram instagram.com/cityoftemecula Flickr flickr.com/cityoftemecula City Council Meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays each month at 7:00 pm in the Council Chambers at Temecula City Hall. Meetings are televised (at the same time and date) on Channel 3 on most local networks, and are available as streaming video on the City website at www.City0fTemecula.org. 1214 Improved E -Government Services Temecula's 25th Anniversary Year Includes an Upgraded Permit and Business License System. The City of Temecula has launched the first phase of its new Enterprise Permitting System, Energov, reflecting the city's efforts to promote e -government services and improve its efficiencies. The new software system being rolled out in phases over the next several months will modernize and streamline the entire permitting and licensing process to save citizens and businesses time and money with the most advanced permitting software available. Under the upgraded system, customers will be able to create a secure account using the Citizen Access Portal (CAP) where they can conduct certain business operations conveniently online. The first phase of implementation will allow customers to renew business licenses online through CAP. Future phases of implementation anticipated in 2015 will allow customers to submit certain permits online to the Building, Fire, Public Works and Planning Departments, as well as track the status of these submittals electronically through the process. To create a secure registration through the City's website, visit www.cityoftemecula.org. Computer kiosks will also be available for customers at city hall. SPECIAL 11.11r ANNIVERSARY EDITION II HAPPY 1 ANNIVERSARY TEMECULA! FOUNDING CIVIC LEADERS REMEMBER TEMECULA'S LONG PATH TO CITYHOOD Written by: Jimmy Moore, President of the [Founding] City Committee, Peg Moore, Secretary of the [Founding] City Committee, and [Founding] Council Member of the first City of Temecula City Council, 1989 In the mid-1980s, citizens of "Rancho California" (a name chosen by land developers) formed an Incorporation Committee headed by A -Z Magnetics President, Les Adam. Residents and businesses wanted to find a way to have a greater say in the way they were governed. They wanted local control. It was too difficult working with Riverside County officials who were far away and spread too thin. They wanted faster police and fire response times, more parks, and better traffic circulation. In 1987, the Committee's petition for incorporation was turned down by the Riverside County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) due to a lack of projected revenue to support the new city government. After the first petition was rejected, 30 citizens from the areas that were known as Rancho California, Murrieta and Murrieta Hot Springs joined together to form a new "City Committee." Enough money and signatures were obtained from citizens of the three communities to seek another shot at cityhood. A new feasibility study was conducted which proved that the larger 87 -square mile area could survive on its own financially. Once again, LAFCO, headed by Riverside County Supervisor Walt Abrams, denied incorporation. Not because of a lack of projected income, but because some of the citizens from the areas of Murrieta and Murrieta Hot Springs, including Supervisor Abrams, objected to being part of a city together with Rancho California (now Temecula). It was a rivalry that had preceded cityhood for a number of years. The City Committee scaled down the next petition with a third proposal for a smaller city that was similar to the first one submitted by Les Adam. The new feasibility study showed that projections exceeded revenue requirements. However, LAFCO rejected the petition because the northern boundary of the proposed city was at Date Street, which the Commission considered a part of Murrieta. After several meetings with LAFCO, the City Committee pointed out that many of the stores on Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and Date Street used "Temecula" as a part of their business name so they should be included in the new boundaries. LAFCO finally agreed that the petition for incorporation could go on the ballot in November of 1989. Residents were asked to vote on the question of incorporation, what the new city would be called, whether council members would be chosen by districts or at large, and the names of the candidates for the first city council were listed. On December 1, 1989, the new city of Temecula was formed. Council Members Peg Moore, Patricia Birdsall, Ron Parks, Sal Munoz and Karel Lindemans were elected to serve at large, 85% voted for cityhood and 70% chose the more historic name "Temecula" rather than "Rancho California" which was a name created by land developers. The founding Council Members chose Ron Parks as the first Mayor of the City of Temecula. The first City Council meetings were held in the Temecula Town Association Building on Pujol Street, which is now known as the Temecula Community Center. _f_j_ril ,_..e.,./._0/... CeZ‘ TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM The Temecula Valley Museum will feature a small exhibit on the incorporation of our City: "Old Traditions, New Opportunities" Now thru January 4, 2015. Please visit to learn more about the history and culture of our community. TemeculaHuseum.org 951-694-6450 The Meaning Behind the Name How is it that the City of Temecula celebrates the 25th anniversary of incorporation on December 1, 2014, yet the valley has been inhabited for thousands of years? Our city slogan "Old Traditions, New Opportunities" is the very embodiment of this dichotomy. We are both a very old community and a large, energetic city filled with exciting opportunities. A 2014 resident community opinion survey shows that what we value most is our small town feel and community involvement, which has at its heart an appreciation for our history and culture. Many know that when voting for incorporation in 1989, citizens were also asked to name their new city. The results of the vote were overwhelmingly in favor of retaining the name that is the heart of the area's cultural roots. Almost 70% of the voters chose "Temecula" as the official name, with "Rancho California" a distant second, and "Temecula Valley" and "Rancho Temecula" garnering only meager votes. Voters celebrated the valley's heritage as our name is derived from the Native Americans who were the first to inhabit the valley. They called their village Temeeku from the Luiseno word "Temecunga". "Teme" meaning "sun," and "nga" meaning `place of". The vote made Temecula the only city in California to retain its aboriginal name, and importantly, set the stage as a city that deeply values cultural traditions and history. TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER 2014 GRAND RE -OPENING On September 17, 2014, the City of Temecula completed the renovation of the Temecula Community Center (TCC). TO RENT THIS FACILITY Contact the Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6469 or visit www.cityof temecula.org/temecula/residents/ parksfacilities/temcommcenter YEARS AGO, THE FOUNDING CITY COUNCIL FIRST MET HERE In the 1980s, founding community members met in this building to discuss city incorporation strategies and, upon incorporation on December 1, 1989, the first of many City Council Meetings were held here. The Temecula Community Center sits alongside Rotary Park just south of Old Town on Pujol Street. Its last major renovation was completed in 1992 after a fire swept through it in December of 1990. Today, the TCC has been freshly reconstructed once again with a new outdoor patio, renovations to the kitchen, a larger multi-purpose room, a new comfortable and inviting lobby space, and completely renovated restrooms and meeting rooms. The City uses the TCC for classes and activities. It will also temporarily house all ticketed music and comedy performances from March through September of 2015 as the City renovates the Old Town Temecula Community Theater and The Merc. WELCOME TO THE ENTER AT TV ENT EPRENEURS EXCHANGE The Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2), the City's technology incubator and business resource center, is excited to welcome the Temecula Higher Education Center (THE Center) as the newest addition to the facility, located at 43200 Business Park Drive. Temecula's 25th year promotes entrepreneurial job growth and higher educational opportunities. TVE2 is home to entrepreneurs, higher education and business resources. The Temecula Higher Education Center is a partnership between Mt. San Jacinto College, California State University San Marcos at Temecula and the City of Temecula that offers students a seamless transition from earning an Associate's degree to earning a Bachelor's degree. Through a program developed by CSUSM-Temecula and MSJC, students can earn Associate and Bachelor degrees in just four years at THE Center. Students will complete the program together in a collaborative learning model. They will save time and money as classes are guaranteed. The opportunity to add higher education and bring students interested in the business administration program to the Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange provides for a unique mix of entrepreneurs (in the TVE2 incubator), students, and business resources in one location. THE Center is MSJC's second educational site in Temecula. The Temecula Education Complex, located on Enterprise Circle West, will continue to offer student services like counseling and classes. Cal State San Marcos will continue to offer classes at its Temecula site on Margarita Road. FOR MORE INFORMATION THE CENTER: www.msjc.edu/CSUSMbusiness 1951-487-3409. TVE2: www.tve2.org 1 951-506-5180. TH ANNIVERSARY QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY Over 95% rated the quality of life in Temecula as excellent or good. CITIZEN SURVEY RESULTS: Earlier this year, a third party survey research firm conducted a citizen survey on behalf of the City of Temecula. The City proactively reaches out to citizens in this way every few years to ensure we keep current on understanding citizen satisfaction, priorities, and concerns regarding the services that the City provides. WHAT YOU LIKE MOST When asked what residents most liked about living in Temecula, the most common response was the City's small town feel and community involve- ment among residents mentioned by 29% of respondents, followed by a low crime rate (22%), cleanliness of the City (21%) and quality of education (1o.6%). WHAT YOU WOULD CHANGE When asked what one change the City could make to improve the quality of life in Temecula, reducing traffic congestion was the most common response (2o%), followed by improving/repairing roads (lo%). One-quarter of the respondents said that either (1) they could not think of anything to change (17%) or (2) do not change anything (7.9%). COMMUNICATION 78% of residents reported being satisfied with the City's efforts to communicate with them. The main source of information that citizens learn about Temecula is tied between the City newsletter at 37% and the Internet in general (not City website) at 37%. Also, City website at 24%, social media at 9%, flyers/brochures at 8%, eblasts/emails at 6% and community events at 4%. SERVICES 93% indicated that they were satisfied with the City's performance in providing municipal services. TRAFFIC Traffic congestion is the #1 issue for residents and 65% indicated that they are generally satisfied with the City's efforts to improve traffic circulation. SPENDING PRIORITIES Making infrastructure improvements to im- prove traffic circulation, and providing incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City, was rated as the top priorities for future City spending. DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT OR WATCH A VIDEO PRESENTATION ABOUT THE SURVEY ONLINE AT: HTTP://WWW. CITYOFTEMECULA.ORG/TEMECULA/ R ESID ENTS/TEMECULA2030/SURVEY.HTM In the News _ Years Ago THE TEMECULA VALLEY ISINESS JOURNAL DECEMBER 1989 SERVING THE BUSINESS COMMON TY Couflcil... Dear City by Perry Peters This column is addressed to the Mayor of Temecula on the twenty -filth anniversary of the birth of tree city. (A copy is to be placed in the time cap- sule scheduled to be buried in the Town Center Shopping Center.) .. The aspirations of those who came before you, their failures and accomplishment the sur. Yoo total of Temecula history—are now entrusted to you. are the caretaker of the soul of 7etnecule. Please remember and respect your roots. As we write this, expectations about the future are highke with iakera bat- ril- liant, many -faceted jewel, Temecula gime re ural beauty. A gifted decorator, Mother Nature DQ eters passing those registered voted. Almost 90 Ia arranged the Setting of the'ferrlecula Val- through for the first tune for eityhood. positive and ley with roiling hills, sun filtering through " what a optedTne fo campaign was l ,'a i the informative. There was no mud-slinging,ivd the mist, clear air and sweet water, and a stil say, s nonegativism. ve-Th The media and can - mild A+tediterraneanclimate. Thlswas the beautiful valley!" . f y gip, thank you can- didates to keep the focus on the - inspiration for our settlers who in 1989 that. vital Issues of the day: traffic flow, It is our fervent prayer that you, in 2014, will continue to receive the Lord's preferential treatment_ Do trvel ra passing through for the first time still#s that. y,What beautiful valley!" 11 they do, thank y our quality of life almost as much as life itself. We trust you do, too. If what you hear are perfunctory compliments, made in allegiance to etiquette (you can tell), let that serve as a red flag, alerting you to the need to rededicate your efforts and your determination to restore that special essence that has made Ole so sweet for us in our time. Thisis written the day after our first mayor and city council members were sworn into office. Caring, aang, involved t t e people took the time candidates, An unusually high 47% of gave birth to this new city. _ ff cur efforts and those of our suc- response time for law enforcement emergencies, parks cellons bear fruit and our dreams materialize. Temeculakid planning. in your day will be a thriving commercial industrial center and recreation, areas, roads over which it is a The men and women who were elected to the city with pleasant residentialmin an Old council began working as a team even before they took Towntr eat to drive. r center pre culture and beaming, min order of reserves its place in history and office. They met at least twice a week, organized their #hat reveres and i succeeding generation, a time, delegated tasks, and accomplished the shares its significance with each $u. 9 nearbywine country known world-wide and protected from their priority, better We are proud of the important role our Chamber of and clean in We played in providing opportunities for a urban encroachment. Are the air and water truly fish and pure in the formal creation of city day? parks, off, tennis, cycling, jagging, horse- informed electorate and in assisting the city council during your Are and g the frantic four weeks preceding back riding arta a variety of team sports within easy government ---even paying to make the services of a pro - access t0 your constituents? From the Desk of the Editor. «,y do t i nlpS07i District: and we had an official city council business meeting. Now it's all officialli The work is just beginning for our local officials, but the commaradarie was so over- whelming and everyone there was in See Dear City Council page r e Continued from page f es.., Dear City Council fessionai consultant avaliabie, t to for the It is too early to know how suc- ompany's cessful they will be, We know they do th Circuit not lack for talent, energy, motivation when +t or an earnest desire to do what's best employ- for the entire community. mpany, Most cities desire what we have in ns with 1989 and what we plan for the near e pool. future. How are things in Temecula In io, No. 2014? Have political considerations and factional disputes become domi- a care nant, making the good of the commu- r1 that pity less important? Are constructive tional projects being sacrificer/ at the altar of ction- egos? Are rivalries developing over to be insignificant Issues, taking time that 'd's- should be spent working on solutions diffi- to real problems? Do your council members serve of with humility? Are they both servants • of the people and leaders when they need to be? The power Qf office is an important tool the people have given you to accomplish their will. Used improperly, it can be used against them. Do most of the citizens look upon your city gov- ernment as a hindrance or a hetp? For the sake of our children and grandchildren, may you enjoy the civic inheritance we pass on to you, like a baton in a relay race. We choose to - tllink it is a positive sign that our city was barn between Thanksgiving and the miracle of Christman. To capitalize on our good luck, we must run a good race. In our lap of the relay, we have sprinted ahead. But this is a long dis- tance race. As you get ready to receive the baton, let civic pride—not greed—motivate you to move forward. From silent, unseen bleachers, we cheer you on. God be with you. 0 'erry Peters is the General Manager r f the Temecula Valley Chamber of ► amerce located al the new Ran - o Highlands Business Park, +945 County Center Drive, Suite 0 - 74 phone number is 676-509a ILECION*SPECIAL. THE CALIFORNIAN - Voters l LAFORNI.c i Voters decide: Ternecula, you're a city �l t Y�r Birdsall, Munoz, Parks get f tc a r- -ear terms on council Karol Lindernans Rasp Parks J. Sal Munoz Peg More Pat Birdsall First City Council Elected Yat 1l'rd... K.Del .ndomores 1 5 011.rk. L ity Comma City Conrail Gita' Council by Sue T°haun,Pei •1 Birdsall, Karel undemuna, Peg Moore Sal htur o% and F mn Parks rill re ilio fkrei cloy quncil over to be In Irie City of rentec+4113 Mr. Parks, Mrs. Birdsall, and Mr. Munoz wilt serve lour year Leans and Mr. Undernana and Airs. Moore NM serve Iwo year terms. A clears campaign was. run and everyone who participated In this is to be dommended lar that. It's kind el nice to see la campaigns with no 'mod -slinging', lust!dela and Iaet, Congratulations to all and we're very lucky here in the City or Temecula to have elected you Ron Parks City Comte II « Temecula, once a dusty way station for the Butterfield Stage, was voted in yesterday as the state's newest city 99 - NOVEMBER 7,1989 Be A Part of Temecula's Modern Day History Whether you are a "Temecula Original" or chose this great city as your new hometown, we are all part of Temecula's legacy. The Temecula Valley History Museum is creating a community photo album as part of Temecula's modern history photo collection. We are specifically looking for photos of street views, landscapes, buildings, special events in Temecula, families or people in Temecula, or swaths of land that are now fully developed. If possible, please submit these photos along with a similar photo taken from the same vantage point today to show "then" and "now" images of how our community has evolved. PHOTO CATEGORIES • 1960-1989 pre -incorporation era • 1989 to present-day era SUBMIT YOUR PHOTOS Send your Temecula photos to the Temecula Valley Museum: Tracy.Frick@CityofTemecula.org. KEEP TEMECULA BEAUTIFUL nil— more gears! (Id Common Violations Residential Properties • Abandoned buildings • Home occupancy permit • Living in garages, sheds or trailers • Inoperable/abandoned vehicles on private property • Land use & zoning • Overgrown vegetation • Substandard or unsanitary living conditions • Trash cans left out past collection day and stored within public view • Unpermitted construction • Auto repairs Commercial Properties • Business license • Hazardous materials & conditions • Illegal storage • Inoperative vehicles • Property maintenance • Certificate of Occupancy • Substandard buildings • Signs • Trash • Unpermitted construction > CODE ENFORCEMENT In accordance with the Quality of Life Master Plan and General Plan, Temecula's Code Enforce- ment Team provides the highest quality of service to Temecula residents and business owners by keeping the City safe and clean through educa- tion and application of the Temecula Municipal Code. When Code Enforcement receives com- plaints about possible violations of the Temecula Municipal Code, the complaint is investigated. If a violation is noted, the case is addressed with the property owner and due process begins. The goal is to work with the property owner to achieve voluntary compliance. Please Report Violations Violations can be reported to the Code Enforce- ment Division in person at the Temecula Civic Center, by telephone at (951) 302-4144 or email through our website at www.cityoftemecula.org. All reports are prioritized based upon the nature of the violation. All personal information is kept strictly confidential. The City of Temecula will not share your information unless required to by law. Anonymous complaints are not accepted. Keeping Air duality Clean in Temecula The American Lung Associa- tion continues to rate the City of Temecula with an "A" rating for its smoke-free clean air policies. The City is now evaluating another clean air program that would convert the entire fleet of refuse collection trucks ser- vicing Temecula to use renew- able natural gas manufactured from our green waste bins. This process would eliminate more than 99% of greenhouse gas emissions from CR&R's vehicle operations in Temecula with waste collection trucks that have the lowest emissions in California. > BUILDING & SAFETY TIPS Address numbers are required on your house> This is part of the State Building Code so that Emergency response teams can locate your property in the event of an emergency. Numbers have to be visible from the street and 4" tall. Inspections> For your safety, water heaters, HVAC systems, patio covers, fire pits and built-in BBQs require a City of Temecula building permit and inspection. Remember to hire only licensed contractors. Construction> is allowed Monday - Saturday from 7:00am to 6:30pm, and not allowed on Sundays or Holidays. Construction Trash> Only CR&R trash dumpsters are authorized on construction sites. If you have any questions, please contact: Building & Safety Department: (951)694-6476 > NO TOLERANCE FOR GRAFFITI Report graffiti immediately to the City of Temecula Public Works Department. The sooner it is reported, the sooner it can be removed. Public Property> Report graffiti ASAP on public property such as bridges, sidewalks and streets and it will be removed promptly by the Public Works Department. Private Property> Before any graffiti removal begins, determine whether the police may want to photograph it as evidence. Removing graffiti promptly (within the first 24 hours if possible) is the best way to prevent it. Prompt and persistent removal usually results in a nearly zero rate of recurrence. When painting over graffiti, save some of the paint for touchups in the event of future vandalism. Look in the Yellow Pages under "Graffiti Removal" or the web for companies that specialize in cleaning up graffiti. Graffiti Hotline: (951) 240-4201 FOR MORE INFORMATION: www.cityoftemecula.org/temecula/government/commdev/codeenforcement/graffiti SEPARATING ORGANIC WASTE FROM GARBAGE AND OTHER RECYCLABLES State Mandates Organic Waste Recycling The City of Temecula contracts with CR&R Environmental Services to dispose of garbage, recyclables and yard waste from residents and businesses. CR&R also provides street sweeping services throughout Temecula. In an effort to maintain compliance with the State of California's legislative mandates, the City is required to implement various recycling programs. Through its contract with CR&R, the City continues to meet and exceed all of these requirements. Recently, two new State Laws, Assembly Bills 1594 and 1826, were approved and signed by the Governor. These new laws go into effect early next year and they will require the City to implement an organic waste recycling program to divert organic waste from both residents and businesses which generate a specified amount of organic waste. The goal of these new laws is to keep organic waste out of landfills where it typically degrades and releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas 20 times more damaging to the atmosphere than CO2. WHAT IS ORGANIC WASTE? State Law defines "Organic Waste" as food waste, green waste, landscape waste and pruning waste, nonhazardous wood waste, and food -soiled paper that is mixed in with food waste. WHERE WILL ORGANIC WASTE GO? CR&R is building a state-of-the-art Anaerobic Digestion (AD) facility at a cost of $25 million. This facility, the only one of its kind in the United States, will convert organic waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and also a rich soil amendment/fertilizer for landscape and farm use. The technology to convert organic yard waste and food scraps into renewable natural gas and a soil amendment/ fertilizer is a proprietary process unique to CR&R that will occur within a fully enclosed structure with zero untreated emissions. CR&R reports that this technology has the highest energy conversion rate in the industry due to its design and digital controls - time, temperature, solids, moisture, nutrients and gas quality. The plant will also utilize "recycled" water from the local waste water treatment plant. According to CR&R, this advanced technology will eliminate methane emissions from green and food waste and they will also be able to convert the City's organic waste into the cleanest transportation fuel available today. This fuel will then be used to power refuse and recycling collection trucks with 100% renewable natural gas (RNG) including the entire fleet servicing all residents and businesses within the City of Temecula. CR&R's AD Facility is scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2015. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR TEMECULA RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES? • This process will eliminate more than 99% of greenhouse gas emissions from CR&R's vehicle operations—the equivalent of taking 3,200 cars off the road in Temecula. • Beginning in the summer of 2015, all CR&R waste & recyclable trucks serving Temecula will use sustainable renewable natural gas (RNG) and have the lowest emissions in California. > This new process will comply with all existing and pending environmental legislation and it will increase our Nation's overall energy independence. > At this time, the City does not anticipate any change to the residential trash collection system (3 carts serviced once per week). However, residents will be encouraged to place all of their food scraps into their green cart along with their regular yard waste rather than placing it into the garbage disposal or mixing it with regular garbage. An optional small covered kitchen waste bin may be provided by CR&R to accommodate this effort. The City and CR&R are evaluating various options for food scrap collection for the businesses in the City which will be implemented prior to the January 1, 2016 mandate established in the new legislation AB1826. WILL THERE BE NEW COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTING THIS LEGISLATION? Although Temecula would benefit from CR&R's Anaerobic Digestion facility in terms of cleaner air to meet new State Laws, there will be costs incurred associated with implementing such a new program. Unfortunately, these new State Laws indicate that no reimbursement by the State will be provided to Temecula. As a result, CR&R may increase its fee to homeowners by approximately $2/month. We welcome your questions or concerns at organicwaste@CityofTemecula.org. REQUESTS TO SPEAK wish to speak on: Subject: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: I 1r - Ss Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA /THA / TPFA (Circle One) I pn ,+ yov�sel� Ar SPc,�,�� ►� -eiv1 c,vl� b��q C(oSQJ Agenda Item No. For Against x Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: �I ► 11 D cM ` Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. I wish to speak on: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA /THAI TPFA (Circle One) Subject: end @awe. esolta-ham &M 5 Agenda Item No. For Against g/P-06' Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: �V 1(f Address: Phone Number: ‘ If you are representing an organization or group, pleaset_give the name: LO Cii.� T K Force tir Nett Cr"1` 1 I ,9 Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. I wish to speak on: Subject: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA /THA / TPFA (Circle One) () CA 44,114 own )10) 1-/z/1 5011/ (T i -K/5 Agenda Item No. For ri Against 3 Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: r)6 `.2..Jv( Address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: IC�ObAre:111 :181/ 1,5)— Phone Number: !) �� ,ya;ior D�{,Snii;ts Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. wish to speak on: Subject: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Public Comment CITY COUNCI CSD / SARDA /THA / TPFA ( rcle One) Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for theeco Name: Address: _____ ,, � If you are representing an organizati or group, please give the name, l Phone Number: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional.