Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
112613 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET NOVEMBER 26, 2013 — 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. Next in Order: Ordinance: 13-08 Resolution: 13-60 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Hannah Sanders and Julia Lucius Invocation: Rabbi Sholom Katz of Chabad of Temecula Valley Flag Salute: To be announced ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS A Grateful City Month in Temecula Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of November 12, 2013. 3 List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Liability Insurance Policy Extension RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve a seven month pro rata liability and excess liability insurance policy extension with Travelers Indemnity Company/Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (Travelers), in the amount of $116,138, for the period of December 1, 2013 through July 1, 2014. ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** I% TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 13-01 Resolution: No. CSD 13-05 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 5 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the action minutes of November 12, 2013. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, December 10, 2013, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — no meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY — no meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY — no meeting RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 6 A Zone Change to change the zoning from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO-13) and to create zoning and residential development standards; a Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels; and a Development Plan to construct a residential protect on a 22.73 acre site consisting of a 270 unit condominium complex with associated amenities and 49 age restricted single-family lots, located at the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (PA11-0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) (APNS 961-450- 012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) 6.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 13- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0276, A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 13 (PDO-13) ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) 6.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0277, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 57 LOTS FROM THREE EXISTING PARCELS TOTALING 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961- 450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) 6.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0275, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE CONSISTING OF A 270 UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES AND 49 AGE RESTRICTED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 7 Selection and Appointment of Local Task Force Members to the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council each appoint two Local Task Force Members to the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety; 7.2 All members of the Committee must be City of Temecula residents. 8 Corporate Sponsorship Draft Policy (at the request of Finance Committee Members Mike Naggar and Chuck Washington) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the Corporate Sponsorship Program in substantial form and authorize the City Manager to make administrative modifications as necessary. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 9 Community Development Department Monthly Report 10 Police Department Monthly Report 11 Public Works Department Monthly Reports CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, December 10, 2013, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694- 6444. PRESENTATIONS WHEREAS, the City of Temecula greatly appreciates the service of our military, including active - duty, honored veterans, and their families; and WHEREAS, we recognize the many sacrifices they have made to protect our freedom and our Liberties; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Tunnel to Towers Foundation, The Gary Sinese Foundation and the Lieutenant Dan Band, two concerts have been hosted by the City of Temecula to benefit severely injured veterans locally, in the form of a smart home, assistance and ongoing support, and recognition to enhance their quality of life; and WHEREAS, in addition to our Memorial Day and Veterans Day events, City banners are proudly displayed to honor Temecula service men and women, and WHEREAS, "Wounded Warrior" parking spaces have been designated at City facilities and provided to all businesses that wish to participate in this innovative program; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted the US Ronald Reagan, partnering with the crew and other heroes in serving our community and the families of active -duty service men and women, and WHEREAS, the City believes that no honor and recognition could ever be enough to show our citizen's gratitude. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Michael S. Naggar, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, with true appreciation and heartfelt thanks to our active duty military, families, and veterans, hereby proclaim the month of November 2013 and each November hereafter, to be Grateful City Month in Temecula IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sct my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this twenty-sixth day of November, 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Item No. 1 Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET NOVEMBER 12, 2013 — 7:00 PM The City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Otoniel Flores Invocation: Pastor Jay Beckley of Stone Creek Bible Church Flag Salute: Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Anti -Bullying Presentation by Macy Mora PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals addressed the City Council: • Lynne Bradley • Kelcey Stricker • Len Borok • Dr. Teo Beam CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Action Minutes 111213 1 2 Action Minutes — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of October 22, 2013. 3 List of Demands — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 2013 — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 2013. 5 Cooperative Agreement for Fire Protection, Prevention, Rescue, and Medical Emergency Services — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, and Medical Emergency Services for the City of Temecula through June 30, 2016. 6 Agreement to provide Consulting Services related to the preparation of Urban/Architectural Design Guidelines for the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. Action Minutes 111213 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Inland Planning + Design, Inc., in the amount of $39,000, for services related to the preparation of Urban/Architectural Design Guidelines for the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan. 7 Extension of the 6th Street Promissory Note between the City of Temecula and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE EXTENSION OF THE 6TH STREET PROMISSORY NOTE 8 An application with the California Energy Commission to provide technical assistance for a comprehensive energy audit of City facilities — Approved Staff Recommendation (3- 0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO PREPARE, SUBMIT, AND EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND ANY AMENDMENT FOR AN APPLICATION FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ENERGY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 9 Entitlement Processing Agreement with Temecula West Village for the Village West Project (at the request of Subcommittee Members Mike Naggar and Jeff Comerchero) — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the Entitlement Processing Agreement with Temecula West Village for the Village West Project. Action Minutes 111213 10 First Amendment to Aareement for Consultant Services with Moffatt & Nichol Enaineers for French Valley Parkway Interchange — Phase I, PW07-04 — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers, in the amount of $70,000, for additional engineering and construction support for the French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements — Phase I, PW07-04. 11 First Amendment to the Professional Services Aareement with Leiahton Consultina. Inc. for Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements — Phase II, PW09-02 — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Leighton Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $125,000, for additional services associated with geotechnical, special inspections, and material testing for the Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements — Phase II, PW09-02. 12 Old Town Temecula Community Theater ADA Transition Plan, PW 12-04 — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the ADA Transition Plan for the Old Town Temecula Community Theater; 12.2 Direct the Building Official to complete plan check and issue construction permits for the Theater Remediation project, without the 39 items identified in the Theater ADA Transition Plan. 13 Temporary Street Closures for 2013 Winterfest Events — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. Action Minutes 111213 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager to temporarily close certain streets for the following 2013 Winterfest Events: SANTA ARRIVES SANTA'S ELECTRIC LIGHT PARADE WINTER WONDERLAND ICE—AMERICA 14 Aareement with Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercurv. Inc. for purchase of a Ford F-350 Truck — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve an Agreement with Rancho Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc., in the amount of $39,518.41, for the purchase of a Ford F-350 1 Ton HD 4x2 Extended Cab Truck with Service Body and Over Cab Ladder Rack. RECESS At 7:34 P.M., the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Meeting. At 7:39 P.M., the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 20 Conditional Vacation of a portion of Jedediah Smith Road located between Pechanaa Parkway and Temecula Parkway — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING THE CONDITIONAL VACATION OF A PORTION OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD By way of a Power Point presentation, Associate Engineer, Steve Charette presented the staff report as per agenda material. Action Minutes 111213 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 21 Amendment of the 2013 California Building and Fire Codes — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Roberts absent) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Set the public hearing for consideration of the Building Code Ordinance and the Fire Code Ordinance for December 10, 2013 and direct the City Clerk to publish notice, as required by law; 21.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 13-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 15.04.010 THROUGH 15.04.080, INCLUSIVE, OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE, THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; AND THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE, AND THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS TO SAID CODES, AND AMENDING SECTION 15.02.060 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PENALTIES AND REMEDIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 15 OF THE CODE, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION 21.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 13-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2013 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BASED ON THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, IN ITS ENTIRETY, REGULATING AND GOVERNING THE SAFEGUARD OF LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS ARISING FROM THE STORAGE, HANDLING AND USE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, MATERIALS AND DEVICES, AND FROM CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS TO LIFE OR PROPERTY IN THE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS AND PREMISES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, INCLUDING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND THE COLLECTION OF FEES Action Minutes 111213 CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City Attorney Thorson announced there was nothing to report. ADJOURNMENT At 8:00 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, November 26, 2013, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Adjourned in Honor of All Who Served Our Country And Protected Our Freedoms ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Michael S. Naggar, Mayor Action Minutes 111213 Item No. 3 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Jada Shafe, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,997,534.37. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of November, 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of November, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 10/31/2013 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/07/2013 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/07/2013 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 11/26/2013 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $730,006.11 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 346.05 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 2,422.46 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 7,596.57 170 MEASURE A FUND 141,913.70 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191,211.40 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 202.09 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,736.35 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 8,730.05 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 24,244.48 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 1,111,649.80 300 INSURANCE FUND 10,477.54 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 46,249.05 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 21,339.40 340 FACILITIES 71,631.45 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM 185.97 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 78,269.42 477 CFD- RORIPAUGH 510.00 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 1,541.99 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 1,531.34 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 1,615.02 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 235.68 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 1,527.39 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 805.59 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 640.26 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 8,647.60 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 80.21 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 297.18 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 72.37 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 6,484.67 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 1,304.15 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 524.56 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 630.34 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 2,061.14 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 81.63 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 4,383.57 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 2,027.16 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 12,699.71 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 28,274.31 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 200.55 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 288.38 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 6,346.06 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 1,762.80 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 162.17 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 1,204.16 $1,216,413.66 1,331,997.79 449,122.92 $2,997,534.37 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 8,555.45 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 142.77 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 5,561.35 001 GENERAL FUND $264,336.19 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 1,740.56 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6,102.73 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 99,087.49 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 251.18 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 2,032.57 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 481.69 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,341.59 300 INSURANCE FUND 4,145.67 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 21,711.51 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 7,738.63 340 FACILITIES 9,705.71 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 88.65 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 59.47 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 70.62 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 12.92 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 143.22 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 25.95 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 36.76 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 243.15 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 2.47 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 11.15 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 7.47 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 162.32 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 34.63 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 20.04 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 17.58 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 40.40 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 3.52 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 150.37 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 80.44 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 218.16 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 369.15 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 8.85 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 9.66 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 207.54 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 66.88 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 3.04 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 9.66 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 305.92 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 4.23 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 28,033.18 TOTAL BY FUND: $2,548,411.45 449,122.92 $2,997,534.37 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2291 10/24/2013 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PIERS ER PAID MEMBER CONTR 146,680.46 146,680.46 RETIREMENT) PAYMENT 161179 10/31/2013 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES piano tuning & maint:theater 161180 10/31/2013 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT EVENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL:TCSD 161181 10/31/2013 012943 ALPHA MECHANICAL SERVICE replace hvac compressor: library INC replaced hvac motor: library HVAC system repair: civic center 161182 10/31/2013 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY SIGNAL BATTERIES:PW TRAFFIC DIV CORPORATION SIGNAL BATTERIES:PW TRAFFIC DI 161183 10/31/2013 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Nov Stand by fee:Police (AFN) 161184 10/31/2013 014235 AND ALL THAT JAZZ 161185 10/31/2013 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO 161186 10/31/2013 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings water filter sys maint:finance drinking water sys: senior center drinking h2o sys maint:civ ctr/senior misc pool supplies:tes swimming pool 161187 10/31/2013 015659 BAGONG BUHAY NEW LIFE refund:sec dep:rm rental:CRC 161188 10/31/2013 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC temecula library: misc collections temecula library: misc collections temecula library: misc collections temecula library: misc collections 161189 10/31/2013 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC VOID 161190 10/31/2013 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS 161191 10/31/2013 016218 BIG GIANT MEDIA, INC TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings event svcs:tcsd:halloween carnival EVENT SVCS:TCSD:TEEN GAME SH Rod Run sponsorship packets:csd spec event announcer/dj:halloween 170.00 672.08 1,879.67 626.74 2,920.59 481.68 49.25 1,248.00 147.00 315.00 27.00 33.48 176.04 1,538.46 329.10 36.16 1,918.59 2,152 16 71.63 0.00 728.00 294.00 63.00 300.00 750.00 1,545.00 400.00 170.00 672.08 5,427.00 530.93 1,248.00 462.00 236.52 1,53846 329.10 4,178.54 0.00 3,680.00 400.00 Page:1 apChkLst 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161192 10/31/2013 016129 BOOJUM INSTITUTE FOR Council comm svc funding:educ prgrm 500.00 500.00 161193 10/31/2013 016283 BREWENS INFINITY SEP OLD TOWN TROLLEY SERVICE 2,250.00 2,250.00 161194 10/31/2013 000128 BROWN & BROWN INSURANCE WC installment pmt:HJUB9055L51213 86,694.00 86,694.00 161195 10/31/2013 004462 C D W GOVERNMENT INC COMPUTER SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 642.55 misc tools & equip supplies: info tech 2,717.10 3,359.65 161196 10/31/2013 012878 C S OFFICE INTERIORS monitor equip:Library 128.80 128.80 161197 10/31/2013 003138 CAL MAT asphalt material: citywide street repairs 523.39 asphalt material: citywide street repairs 454.09 asphalt material:citywide street repairs 411.61 asphalt material: citywide street repairs 329.64 asphalt material:citywide street repairs 328.85 asphalt material: citywide street repairs 170.38 2,217.96 161198 10/31/2013 004248 CALIF DEPT OF AUG DUI & DRUG 630.00 630.00 JUSTICE-ACCTING SCREENINGS: POLICE 161199 10/31/2013 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION 8/1-7/31/14 CPRS MB:HAWKINS, K. 475.00 475.00 SOC 161200 10/31/2013 007146 CALIFORNIA SENSOR CORP irrig controller upgrade:vailranch slope 8,811.40 8,811.40 161201 10/31/2013 010514 CAMPINI'S ITALIAN DELI refreshments:CERT class 11/3:Fire 282.75 282.75 161202 10/31/2013 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY Sep Claim adjuster services 1,506.40 1,506.40 INC 161203 10/31/2013 016332 CHAISSON, CYNTHIA R. TCSD instructor earnings 399.00 399.00 161204 10/31/2013 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL misc electrical supplies: var parks 77.76 DIST. misc electrical supplies: var parks 21.06 98.82 161205 10/31/2013 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD Instructor Earnings 308.00 308.00 161206 10/31/2013 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE MISC SUPPLIES:HUMAN SVCS DIV 83.36 MISC SUPPLIES:HUMAN SVCS DIV 60.56 143.92 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161207 10/31/2013 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & misc carpentry imprvments: civic ctr 2,850.00 HVAC INC interior improvements: maint facility Monument repair:rrsp Plumbing repair: Sta 95 161208 10/31/2013 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Oct water meter:39656 Diego Dr DIST Oct water meter:39569 Seraphina Rd 161209 10/31/2013 011202 EMH SPORTS USA, INC TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings 161210 10/31/2013 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE JULY EIR:JEFFERSON CORRIDOR ASSOC. 161211 10/31/2013 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC July Idscp services 161212 10/31/2013 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 161213 10/31/2013 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK 161214 10/31/2013 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS 161215 10/31/2013 004944 FULLCOURT PRESS 161216 10/31/2013 016184 FUN EXPRESS, LLC 161217 10/31/2013 010326 G E MOBILE WATER, INC 161218 10/31/2013 001937 GALLS INC 161219 10/31/2013 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC SOCIETY 161220 10/31/2013 014173 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 161221 10/31/2013 016414 GONSALVES, MYRA 161222 10/31/2013 015283 GRACE PRESBYTERIAN July Indscp services Oct Express mail services Sep -Oct Express mail services Settlement: Pippin 10/10-27 sound/lighting/misc supplies:theater BUSINESS LICENSE CERTIFICATES: FINANCE SUPPLIES:HIGH HOPES PROGRAM water filtration parts: Sta 73 water filtration parts: Sta 73 Fire equipment: Sta 84 SETTLEMENT: CLASS ICS... MERC OCT '13 pavement seal/equip rental: var parks refund:j paul getty museum: 8660.301 refund:sec dep:picnic: Ronald ReganSports 1,500.00 3,500.00 127.50 7,977.50 112.40 868.20 980.60 392.00 966.00 308.00 1,666.00 42,622.09 42,622.09 818.00 490.00 49.71 191.30 7,143.10 83.20 546.54 204.13 64.00 25.92 190.78 801.50 1,308.00 241.01 7,143.10 83.20 546.54 204.13 89.92 190.78 801.50 913.14 913.14 24.00 24.00 200.00 200.00 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161223 10/31/2013 003792 GRAINGER safety sign, AED 10x7":Fire 60.20 safety sign, AED 10x7":Fire 100.33 Fire equipment: Sta 84 207.90 MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER- 27.45 MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 139.11 MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER- 178.09 713.08 161224 10/31/2013 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL Nov copier leases:civic center, TVE2 289.44 SVCS NOV COPIER LEASES:CIVIC CENTE 1,341.70 NOV COPIER LEASES:CIVIC CENTE 520.09 2,151.23 161225 10/31/2013 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC misc maint supplies: harveston center 66.16 misc maint supplies:senior center 32.39 misc maint supplies:police substation 15.52 misc maint supplies:theater 111.88 misc maint supplies:crc 69.72 misc maint supplies: library 56.59 misc supplies: info tech 2.15 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:TVM, C. MU: 39.81 misc supplies: PW traffic div 7091 misc hardware supplies:TVM 112.70 misc maint supplies: pw street maint 12.50 590.33 161226 10/31/2013 004188 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES SEP CONST MGMT SRVCS:FV 111,634.56 111,634.56 INTERCHNG 161227 10/31/2013 006250 HAZ MAT TRANS INC haz mat disposal srvcs: pw 763.34 763.34 161228 10/31/2013 014167 HELIO POWER, INC. prev maint srvcs:garage solar panels 1,490.00 1,490.00 161229 10/31/2013 010210 HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC, misc maint supplies:various facilities 75.91 THE misc maint supplies: history museum 298.19 374.10 161230 10/31/2013 003198 HOME DEPOT, THE misc supplies: Halloween carnival 87.17 87.17 161231 10/31/2013 015315 HYLAND SOFTWARE, INC. SIRE agenda to go maintenance:IT 499.00 499.00 161232 10/31/2013 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT shred services:Police 10/7 15.00 shred services: records division 60.00 shred services: records division 15.00 shred services: records division 16.80 106.80 161233 10/31/2013 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT copier maint/repair & usage:citywide 726.43 SOLUTIONS copier maint/repair & usage:citywide 5,951.97 6,678.40 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161234 10/31/2013 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY pool supplies: var swimming pools 426.38 426.38 INC 161235 10/31/2013 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 411.60 411.60 161236 10/31/2013 003046 K F R O G 95.1 FM RADIO advertising:quilt show 2013 231.00 231.00 161237 10/31/2013 013802 KAUFMAN CONSULTATION cross -connection testing/insp:var parks 3,100.00 3,100.00 161238 10/31/2013 004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC equip repair & maint:police lidar & 87.03 87.03 161239 10/31/2013 007188 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORP CPR Class supplies: Medics 268.87 CPR Class supplies: Medics 50.00 318.87 161240 10/31/2013 014432 LANAIR GROUP, LLC telephone service & maint:info tech 750.00 750.00 161241 10/31/2013 014817 LAPP, JEREMY SCOTT Settlement: Cabaret ... Merc 10/27 248.50 248.50 161242 10/31/2013 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC SEP GEOTECH SVCS:RORI RANCH 24,411.50 24,411.50 STR IMPR 161243 10/31/2013 014228 LSK, LLC NOV FACILITY LEASE 4,993.56 4,993.56 PMT:HARVESTON 161244 10/31/2013 008610 M C R STAMPS DJ srvcs:high hopes pgrm events 25.00 25.00 161245 10/31/2013 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS SIGNS: CRIME PREVENTION 1,996.65 misc street signs: pw street maint div 286.20 misc street signs: pw street maint div 498.64 misc street signs: pw street maint div 2,816.10 misc street signs: pw street maint div 207.36 misc street signs: pw street maint div 1,726.92 misc street signs: pw street maint div 70.20 7,602.07 161246 10/31/2013 004141 MAINTEX INC misc custodial supplies: var fac 521.10 521.10 161247 10/31/2013 015287 MANALILI, JOEL refund:sec dep:rm rental:MPSC 20000 200.00 161248 10/31/2013 014431 MARTLAND. BETTE B TCSD Instructor Earnings 159.25 159.25 161249 10/31/2013 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS INC. Consultant srvcs:csd santa house 132.25 132.25 Page:5 apChkLst 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 161250 10/31/2013 015259 MERCURY DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC. Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA (Continued) Description household battery recycling program 161251 10/31/2013 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC temecula library: A/V collections temecula library: A/V collections 161252 10/31/2013 007669 MILES, KATRINA TCSD Instructor Earnings 161253 10/31/2013 012962 MILLER, MISTY TCSD Instructor Earnings 161254 10/31/2013 012580 MINUTEMAN PRESS printed envelopes: business license BUSINESS CARDS FOR CHERYL Kll 161255 10/31/2013 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY, misc electrical supplies: senior center INC misc electrical supplies: old town 161256 10/31/2013 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL SEP ENG/CONST SVCS:FV INTERCHG ENGINEERS 161257 10/31/2013 001986 MUZAK LLC Nov dish network programing:foc NOV DISH NETWORK PRGM:41952 E 161258 10/31/2013 002925 NAPAAUTO PARTS misc veh parts/supplies:pw street maint misc veh parts/supplies:pw street main 161259 10/31/2013 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION fire prevention week supplies:Fire ASSN 161260 10/31/2013 012893 NEWMAN, KAREN reimb:art supplies:high hopes pgrm 161261 10/31/2013 014391 NICHOLS, KELLIE D. TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings 161262 10/31/2013 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS JAN-MARASSN DUES XXX-16:FV PARK INTERCHG JAN-MARASSN DUES XXX-16:FV IN- JAN-MARASSN DUES XXX-20:FV IN- 161263 10/31/2013 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS MISC PRINTING SRVCS:FINANCE DIV 161264 10/31/2013 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Street Maint City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Street Mai City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Street Mai City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Street Mai City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Park Main Page: 6 Amount Paid Check Total 164.16 194.32 113.36 105.00 416.50 657.59 79.73 84.76 31.67 31,176.64 128.31 55.00 27.13 16.74 3,231.97 70.40 386.75 204.75 432.25 536.01 498.15 676.82 883.09 1,948.45 842.94 267.31 794.40 48.75 164.16 307.68 105.00 416.50 737.32 116.43 31,176 64 183.31 43.87 3,231.97 70.40 1,023.75 1,710.98 883.09 3,901.85 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161265 10/31/2013 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Park Maint 55.00 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Park Main 281.00 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Park Main 1,890.64 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Park Main 138.15 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Park Main 186.51 2,551.30 161266 10/31/2013 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:Park Ranger 55.00 55.00 161267 10/31/2013 015033 PACIFIC MUNICIPAL 6/29-8/30 CONSULT SRVCS:HOUSING 1,808.75 1,808.75 CONSULTANTS ELEMENT 161268 10/31/2013 002800 PACIFIC STRIPING INC Citywide street striping program 141,913.70 141,913.70 161269 10/31/2013 002652 PAT & OSCARS RESTAURANT refreshments:Team PACE halloween 397.53 397.53 161270 10/31/2013 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 351.76 351.76 161271 10/31/2013 005124 PHENIX TECHNOLOGY Helmets for Explorer Post Prgm 220.60 220.60 161272 10/31/2013 015512 PINO, KAREN art instruction: halloween carnival 300.00 30000 161273 10/31/2013 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL misc pool supplies/chemicals:var pools 169.99 169.99 PRODUCTS INC 161274 10/31/2013 014494 R & R CONTROLS, INC hvac repairs: crc and tcc/safe 691.80 691.80 161275 10/31/2013 015709 RAHN CONSERVATION 9/19-10/15 envir.monitoring: main 2,140.00 2,140.00 CONSULTING, 161276 10/31/2013 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER Sep var water meters: Fire Stns 509.96 DISTRICT Sep var water meter: Pauba Rd 16.55 Aug var water meter:30875 Rancho vis 443.53 Sep water meter: 30600 Pauba Rd 810.33 Sep water meter-comm:30600 Pauba 1 459.58 Oct var water meters:TCSD svc lev C 22,324.89 Sep water meter:30875 Rancho Vista F 16.55 Sep water meter:30875 Rancho Vista F 990.52 25,571.91 161277 10/31/2013 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN Veh repair & maint:Police CAP 491.82 491.82 MERCURY 161278 10/31/2013 009725 RAZAVI, MANDIS TCSD Instructor Earnings 137.20 137.20 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161279 10/31/2013 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & Sept 2013 legal services 53,038.38 53,038.38 GERSHON 161280 10/31/2013 010777 RIVERSIDE CO EXECUTIVE Debt service fee:animal shelter 12,267.47 12,267.47 OFFICE 161281 10/31/2013 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS Century Bike Ride patrol srvcs 10/11-12 3,503.04 3,503.04 DEPT 161282 10/31/2013 006432 RIVERSIDE COMM. COLLEGE workshops/consulting srvcs:eco dev 2,500.00 2,500.00 DIST. 161283 10/31/2013 016415 ROBLES-RICHMOND, MARIO refund:sec dep:tournament: PBSP 1,000.00 1,000.00 161284 10/31/2013 001048 ROSAS CANTINA RESTAURANT refreshments:CERTtrng 11/2 161285 10/31/2013 012251 ROTH, DONALD J. 161286 10/31/2013 000815 ROWLEY, CATHY 161287 10/31/2013 000277 S & SARTS & CRAFTS INC 161288 10/31/2013 009196 SACRAMENTO THEATRICAL LIGHTING 161289 10/31/2013 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC 161290 10/31/2013 004498 SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. 161291 10/31/2013 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 161292 10/31/2013 000374 SO CALIF EDISON 161293 10/31/2013 000374 SO CALIF EDISON TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings Misc supplies:TCSD special events Misc supplies:TCSD special events THEATRICAL LIGHTING SUPPLIES:THEATER Jazz @ the Marc 10/24 Aug traffic signal maint: pw traffic Sept traffic signal maint: pw traffic Misc supplies:Human Services install electric line ext:btrfld stg rd install/energize street lights:btrfld 290.75 315.00 336.00 168.00 12.93 255.59 136.20 478.10 314.55 3,447.65 87.32 270,107.37 46.628.97 290.75 315.00 504.00 268.52 136.20 478.10 3,762.20 87.32 270,107.37 46,628.97 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 161294 10/31/2013 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Description Oct 2-14-204-1615: 30027 Front St Oct 2-33-357-5785:44747 Redhawk Oct 2-35-164-3515:32932 Leena way Oct 2-27-371-8494:42189 Winchester Oct 2-29-224-0173:various fire stns Oct 2-34-624-4452 Stn 95 Oct 2-28-904-7706:32329 Overland LS Oct 2-28-331-4847:32805 Pauba LS-3 Oct 2-21-981-4720:30153 Tern pkwy tp Oct 2-35-074-2847:27495 Enterprise ci Oct 2-34-333-3589:41702 Main St Oct 2-35-707-0010:41000 Main St Sep 2-30-099-3847 29721 Ryecrest Oct 2-35-164-3770:43487 Butterfield sl Oct 2-18-937-3152:28314 Mercedes Oct 2-19-171-8568:28300 Mercedes S1 Oct 2-35-664-9053:29119 Margarita Rc Oct 2-31-912-7494:28690 Mercedes Si Oct 2-35-164-3242:44270 Meadows pk Oct 2-29-657-2787:41638 Winchester I Oct 2-29-807-1226:28077 Diaz rd PED Oct 2-29-807-1093:28079 Diaz rd PED Oct 2-29-223-8607:42035 2nd St PED Oct 2-25-393-4681:41951 Moraga Rd Oct 2-32-903-8293:41000 Main St Oct 2-29-933-3831:43230 Bus pk dr Oct 2-02-351-4946:41845 6th St Oct 2-31-031-2616:27991 Diaz rd PED Oct 2-31-282-0665:27407 Diaz rd PED Oct 2-31-536-3481:41902 Main St Oct 2-31-536-3655:41904 Main St Oct 2-35-164-3663:42335 Meadows pk Oct 2-31-419-2873:43000 Hwy-395 Oct 2-35-421-1260:41955 4th St LS3 Amount Paid Check Total 40.84 31.39 26.12 33.15 2,038.27 817.42 139.56 104.29 23.11 39.10 77.91 54.42 24.89 27.76 602.88 92.46 345.63 1,446.51 27.14 27.49 28.05 27.94 726.43 474.20 22, 661.13 1,777.39 1,384.16 28.20 28.36 272.53 1,133.36 26.12 27.19 20.53 34,635.93 Page:9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank. union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 161295 10/31/2013 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 161296 10/31/2013 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 161297 10/31/2013 016284 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF INSTRUCTION 161298 10/31/2013 003840 STRONGS PAINTING Description Oct 091-024-9300-5:30875 Rancho Oct 026-671-2909-8:Comm Theater Oct 055-461-2483-4:40135 Village rd Oct 091-085-1632-0:41951 Moraga rd Oct 028-025-1468-3:41375 McCabe Ct Oct 101-525-1560-6:27415 Enterprise Oct 117-188-6393-6:32131 S Loop rd Oct 095-167-7907-2:30650 Pauba Rd Oct 021-725-0775-4:Senior Center Sep 125-244-2108-3:Library Oct 181-383-8881-6:Museum Oct 129-535-4236-7:Civic Center Oct 129-582-9784-3:43230 Bus pk dr Oct 133-040-7373-0:Maint Fac Oct 101-525-0950-0:28816 Pujol St pest control services: wolf creek park pest control services: rancho calif pest control services: meadows pkwy pest control services: temeku hills TCSD instructor earnings painting srvcs: vail ranch slope 161299 10/31/2013 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD Misc supplies:Children's Museum SRVCS Misc supplies:TCSD special events 161300 10/31/2013 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS Veh repair & maint:Police LLC Veh repair & maint:Police 161301 10/31/2013 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Nov high speed internet:civic center Oct high speed internet:29119 Margarit 161302 10/31/2013 016094 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DALY & CO AUDIT SRVCS:FINANCE DEPT FY 12/13 LLP 161303 10/31/2013 004261 VERIZON 161304 10/31/2013 004789 VERIZON Oct xxx-8625 gen usage:Civic Center Oct xxx-0074 general usage Oct xxx-5072 general usage Oct xxx-2886 gen usage:Harveston Oct Internet svcs:Tem PD DSL Oct Internet svcs: Library Amount Paid 1,928.47 91.50 24.23 466.02 16.65 58.32 44.09 119.97 78.24 21.40 29.92 999.73 57.40 17.60 18.53 4900 94.00 9400 94.00 420.00 8,500.00 49.55 55.17 742.37 189.41 4,249.12 67.50 17, 000.00 196.57 1,933.26 935.89 115.09 49.99 174.99 Check Total 3,972.07 331.00 420.00 8,500.00 104.72 931.78 4,31662 17, 000.00 3,180.81 224.98 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 161305 10/31/2013 009101 VISION ONE INC Aug ShoWare ticketing services: Theater Sept ShoWare ticketing services: Thea Jul ShoWare ticketing services: Theate 161306 10/31/2013 006248 WALKER, JESSICA TCSD Instructor Earnings 161307 10/31/2013 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC misc cleaning supplies:mpsc 161308 10/31/2013 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE FY 13/14 WRCOG membership dues COUNCIL OF 161309 10/31/2013 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL Reimb:halloween carnival supplies 999687 10/25/2013 016416 BURKARD, LUCRECIA refund: one class cancellled: 1035.302 999688 10/25/2013 016417 HELMER, GINA refund: cpr/aed TVUSD: 8250.306 999689 10/25/2013 016418 KOZICH, PATRICIA refund:sec dep:rm rental: Harveston 999690 10/25/2013 016419 SHARPLES, JESSICA refund: cpr/aed: 8250.302 Amount Paid Check Total 1,558.20 2,614.40 1,159.20 5,331.80 402.50 402.50 197.00 197.00 13,424.45 13,424.45 321.95 321.95 11.00 11.00 25.00 25.00 200.00 200.00 64.00 64.00 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 1,216,413.66 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 10/31/2013 9:39:31AM CITY OF TEMECULA 136 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,216,413.66 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 2297 11/07/2013 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA - PROJECT RETIREMENT 3,145.46 3,145.46 SOLUTION PAYMENT 2298 11/07/2013 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 1,559.06 1,559.06 SUPPORT 2299 11/07/2013 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH ADMIN COST PAYMENT 84,869.73 PREMIUM BLUE SHIELD ACCESS+ PAYMENT 0.00 84,869.73 2300 11/07/2013 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 6,049.32 6,049.32 303355 PAYMENT 2301 11/07/2013 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE DISABILITY INS PAYMENT 23,874.96 23,874.96 2302 11/07/2013 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT 82,984.73 82,984.73 2303 11/07/2013 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 14,664.01 14,664 01 SOLUTION 2305 11/07/2013 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT 5,400.89 5,400.89 PAYMENT 161310 11/04/2013 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC VOID 0.00 0.00 161311 11/05/2013 011733 URIBE, RICHARD EE computer loan program 1,976.37 1,976.37 161313 11/07/2013 003552 A F L A C AFLAC CANCER PAYMENT 2,053.63 2,053.63 161314 11/07/2013 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI TCSD instructor earnings 630.00 630.00 161315 11/07/2013 010851 ADAMIAK, DAWN Reimb:health permit concert 11/2 178.00 178.00 161316 11/07/2013 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL Sep training & supplies:police K-9 unit 283.34 283.34 INC 161317 11/07/2013 010904 AFECO INC fire equipment: Sta 84 202.40 202.40 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161318 11/07/2013 012943 ALPHA MECHANICAL SERVICE hvac prev maint svcs:fire stn 84 232.70 INC perform diag inspect hvac:audio 148.33 repair vandalized hvac unit # 1 1,245.06 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 59.65 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 238.60 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 89.48 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 89.48 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 259.48 PERFORM DIAG INSPECT HVAC: PB 89.48 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 626.41 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 920.66 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 481.79 emerg hvac repairs: civic center 219.28 HVAC REPAIRS:INFO TECH 1,024.43 HVAC REPAIRS:INFO TECH 2,305.00 HVAC REPAIRS:INFO TECH 634.29 8,664.12 161319 11/07/2013 004307 ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. OCT WATER MAINT:HARV LAKE/DUCK 3,900.00 3,900.00 POND 161320 11/07/2013 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 161321 11/07/2013 001445 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TEMECULA 161322 11/07/2013 009597 BALL, DIANE bottled water svcs:TVE2 bottled water svc:crc bottled water svc:library bottled water svc:theater bottled water svc: FOC bottled water svc:pbsp bottled water svc:harveston center bottled water services: city council bottled water svc:children's museum bottled water svc:history museum FY 13-14 comm svc funding pgrm EE computer loan program 161323 11/07/2013 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings 161324 11/07/2013 003215 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS Title 13 motor vehicles:Police 2599627 161325 11/07/2013 013482 BAS SECURITY Oct security:harveston lake park 161326 11/07/2013 010470 BED BATH & BEYOND furniture: Fire Stn 95 35.30 97.04 60.37 36.06 108.79 39.68 32.48 33.83 24.54 19.15 5,000.00 974.99 245.00 227.50 345.00 1,496.00 874.50 487.24 5,000.00 974.99 472.50 345.00 1,496.00 874.50 Paget apChkLst 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 161327 11/07/2013 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA (Continued) Description Amount Paid furniture: Fire Stn 95 1,657.37 Page: 3 Check Total 1,657.37 161328 11/07/2013 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS TCSD instructor earnings 500.50 TCSD instructor earnings 1,470.00 TCSD instructor earnings 308.00 event svcs:tcsd:2013 backstage tees 319.Q0 2,597.50 161329 11/07/2013 005716 BIRTH CHOICE OF TEMECULA FY 13-14 comm svc funding prgm 5,000.00 5,000.00 INC 161330 11/07/2013 008605 BONTERRA CONSULTING SEP ENVIRO CONSULT:MURR CRK 826.00 826.00 BRIDGE 161331 11/07/2013 014660 BOYD, CHERYL J. refund:sec dep:rental:Pala Park 200.00 200.00 161332 11/07/2013 000128 BROWN & BROWN INSURANCE CNA surety:Aaron Adams 71373267 207.12 policy renewal:Greg Butler 106013899 350.00 557.12 161333 11/07/2013 003138 CAL MAT asphalt material:citywide street repairs 317.02 asphalt material:citywide street repairs 279.97 asphalt material:citywide street repairs 754.40 asphalt material:citywide street repairs 386.27 asphalt material: citywide street repairs 319.39 2,057.05 161334 11/07/2013 010939 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL 143026 elevator insp:41000 Main St S 225.00 143027 elevator insp:41000 Main St S 225.00 143028 elevator insp:41000 Main St S 225.00 157047 elevatorinsp:28690 Mercedes 225.00 157048 elevatorinsp:28690 Mercedes 225.00 1,125.00 161335 11/07/2013 010514 CAMPINI'S ITALIAN DELI refreshments:CERT training 11/3 148.65 148.65 161336 11/07/2013 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, NOV COPIER LEASES:CIVIC CENTER 3,004.54 3,004.54 INC 161337 11/07/2013 005311 CERTIFIED POOL WATER Oct water fountain maint:civic ctr/town 550.00 SPCL. Oct fountain maint svcs:town sq 350.00 swimming pool maint svcs: crc & tes 1,025.00 1,925.00 161338 11/07/2013 014726 CHAPTER 13 STANDING SUPPORT PAYMENT 182.77 182.77 TRUSTEE 161339 11/07/2013 015090 CLEARWATER SYSTEMS hvac condenser h2o prev maint:civ ctr 550.00 550.00 CORP 161340 11/07/2013 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES 44.00 44.00 CHARITIES PAYMENT Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161341 11/07/2013 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL misc electrical supplies: var parks 194.40 DIST. misc electrical supplies:civic center 55.08 misc electrical supplies: var parks 45.90 misc electrical supplies: var parks 260.55 555,93 161342 11/07/2013 011922 CORELOGIC, INC. web subscription: real quest:code enf 2,600.00 web subscription:real quest:code enf 22.00 web subs cription:real quest:code enf 22.00 WEB SUBSCRIPTION: REAL QUEST:' 11.00 2,655.00 161343 11/07/2013 004329 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP CERT training supplies: TCC 558,45 558.45 161344 11/07/2013 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & restroom maint. svc.:crc 165.00 165.00 HVAC INC 161345 11/07/2013 014364 CUNNINGHAM, GRISELDA TCSD Instructor Earnings 246.75 246.75 CLEMENTINA 161346 11/07/2013 014580 DANCE THEATRE COLLECTIVE Settiement:danceXchange 9117 126.00 126.00 161347 11/07/2013 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. Sep parking citation processing: police 1,390.85 1,390.85 161348 11/07/2013 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATES Oct fed legislative consulting srvcs:cm 3,500.00 3,500.00 161349 11/07/2013 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL portable restroom services:var parks 52.80 SRVCS portable restroom services:var parks 52.80 portable restroom services:var parks 52.80 portable restroom services:var parks 52.80 211.20 161350 11/07/2013 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Oct water meter:32131 S Loop rd dcda 320.55 DIST Oct water meter:32131 S Loop Rd bldc 84,92 Oct water meter:32131 S Loop rd dcda 42.00 447.47 161351 11/07/2013 004068 ECALDRE MANALILI-DE VILLA, TCSD Instructor Earnings 210.00 AILEEN TCSD Instructor Earnings 257.25 TCSD Instructor Earnings 280.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 183.75 TCSD Instructor Earnings 280.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 168.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 257.25 TCSD Instructor Earnings 346,50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 140.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 210.00 2,332.75 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 11/07/201.3 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 161352 11/07/2013 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY NOV STATE LEGIS CONSULTING LLC SVCS:CM OFC Amount Paid Check Total 3,500.00 3,500.00 161353 11/07/2013 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE SEP EIR:JEFFERSON CORRIDOR 5,216.95 ASSOC. AUG EIR:JEFFERSON CORRIDOR 52,119.38 57,336.33 161355 11/07/2013 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC irrigation repairs: vail ranch slope 223.89 IRRIG REPAIRS: VAIL RANCH SLOP[ 253.62 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 61.68 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 221.72 irrigation repair: wolf creek slope 281.22 MISC LNDSCP MAINT REPAIRS:VAR 349.02 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 330.50 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 126.50 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 631.62 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 76.44 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 411.41 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 143.64 irrigation repair srvcs: vail ranch 266.68 irrigation repair:saddlewood slope 107.62 irrigation repairs: harveston slope 236.89 irrigation repair: temeku hills slope 329.93 irrigation repairs: harveston slope- 121.46 July Indscp maint svc:sports parks 50,935.88 JULY LDSCP MAINT SVC:VAR PARK 47,825.10 July Idscp maint svcs: var south slopes 34,844.87 July Idscp maint svcs: var north slopes 19,749.97 JULY LDSCP MAINT SVC:VARIOUS P 17,994.70 July Idscp maint svcs: var facilities 9,893.13 planting:work order #1321 528.00 JUL FV INTERCHG:TEM MARINE, BA 200.00 JUL FRENCH VLY INTER:41375 MCC 200.00 credit memo:work order #1297 -400.00 LDSCP ENHANCEMENT:OLD TOWNi 4,593.00 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 378.80 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 341.52 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 201.29 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 354.82 misc Indscp maint repairs:var parks 326.28 192,141.20 161356 11/07/2013 009953 FEDERAL CLEANING Nov janitorial svcs:police mall 761.50 761.50 CONTRACTORS 161357 11/07/2013 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC Oct Express mail services 47.04 47.04 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 161358 11/07/2013 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC JC REFRESHMENTS:SW T-NOW MTG 10/23 161359 11/07/2013 014819 FLATIRON WEST, INC. OCT CONST:FV PKWY PROJ 161360 11/07/2013 011145 FOSTER, JILL CHRISTINE TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings 161361 11/07/2013 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 161362 11/07/2013 016436 FRICK, TRACY Reimb:museum items 161363 11/07/2013 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS SOUND/LIGHTING/MISC SUPPLIES:THEATER 161364 11/07/2013 013912 FUN ZONE BOAT COMPANY sister cities:sea lion tour 12/2 161365 11/07/2013 013076 GAUDET, YVONNE M. TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings 161366 11/07/2013 016435 GH WOOD DESIGN furniture: Fire Stn 95 161367 11/07/2013 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:VARIOUS INC FIRE STNS 161368 11/07/2013 003792 GRAINGER facility supplies: Sta 95 d/c equip gear motor: pennypickles wk; 161369 11/07/2013 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FY 13-14 comm svc funding pgrm 161370 11/07/2013 008081 HALL & FOREMAN INC SEP CONSULTANT SVCS:CITYWIDE PAVE REHAB 161371 11/07/2013 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:VAR FIRE STNS MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:CIVIC CTR, " MISC MAINT SUPPLIES:TCSD, PW 161372 11/07/2013 012204 HERITAGE FAMILY MINISTRIES TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings 161373 11/07/2013 004221 INLAND EMPIRE AFFILIATE OF FY 13-14 comm svc funding prgm Amount Paid Check Total 132.84 241,433.51 1,241.33 509.60 2,542.40 1,165.27 135.00 260.01 235.94 84.00 231.00 30.80 1,766.64 856.18 396.91 65.47 5,000.00 2,350.20 245.58 524.77 1,490.04 648.37 819.01 2,200.00 132.84 241,433.51 5,458.60 135.00 260.01 235.94 84.00 261.80 1,766.64 856.18 462.38 5,000.00 2,350.20 2,260.39 1,467.38 2,200.00 Page.6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161374 11/07/2013 013695 INLAND EMPIRE SHRED IT shred services:Police 10/14 15.00 15.00 161375 11/07/2013 010766 INLAND VALLEY SYMPHONY performance:veterans day event 11/11 2,000.00 2,000.00 161376 11/07/2013 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY pool supplies: var swimming pools 505.73 505.73 INC 161377 11/07/2013 006924 INTL MUNICIPAL SIGNAL traffic signal wkshp:Uribe, Richard 120.00 120.00 ASSOC. 161378 11/07/2013 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC JACOB'S HOUSE CHARITY PAYMENT 60.00 60.00 161379 11/07/2013 013200 JAROTH INC Nov pay phones:duck pond, Library, CRC 212.64 212.64 161380 11/07/2013 016413 JEROME'S FURNITURE furniture: Fire Stn 95 561.58 561.58 WAREHOUSE 161381 11/07/2013 016437 KOSIEK, SHIRLEY Reimb:museum items 83.25 83.25 161382 11/07/2013 000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC fire equipment: Sta 73 323.99 323.99 161383 11/07/2013 013879 LAKESHORE LEARNING misc supplies:var crc pgrms 27.50 27.50 MATERIALS 161384 11/07/2013 008680 LA-Z-BOY furniture: Fire Stn 95 1,511.98 1,511.98 161385 11/07/2013 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC SEP GEOTECH SVC:MAIN ST 6,264.00 BRIDGE/MURR CRK SEP SOILS/MATERIAL TESTING:PA\ 7,816.10 14,080.10 161386 11/07/2013 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & Sep HR legal svcs for TE060-00001 840.00 840.00 WHITMORE 161387 11/07/2013 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE Oct xxx-0714 gen usage:PD mall alarm 31.05 Oct xxx-0346 general usage 30.43 61.48 161388 11/07/2013 014365 MAILFINANCE, INC. POSTAGE METER LEASE:CENTRAL 1,376.45 1,376.45 SVCS 161389 11/07/2013 002664 MAR CO INDUSTRIES INC prev maint:var park sites & facilities 270.00 270.00 161390 11/07/2013 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSN Oct officiating svcs:sports programs 4,292.00 4,292.00 Page:7 apChkLst 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161391 11/07/2013 016440 MATTRESS DISCOUNTERS furniture: Fire Stn 95 900.72 900.72 161392 11/07/2013 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE METLIFE DENTAL INSURANCE 7,807.90 7,807.90 COMPANY PAYMENT 161393 11/07/2013 005690 MICHELLE'S PLACE WOMENS FY 13-14 comm svc funding pgrm 5,000.00 5,000.00 BREAST 161394 11/07/2013 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC Temecula Library: A/V collections 182.47 182.47 161395 11/07/2013 007669 MILES, KATRINA TCSD Instructor Earnings 122.50 122.50 161396 11/07/2013 012962 MILLER, MISTY TCSD Instructor Earnings 300.13 300.13 161397 11/07/2013 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC fence installation: OATC 3,469.39 3,469.39 161398 11/07/2013 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS misc veh parts/supplies:pw street maint 42.11 misc veh parts/supplies:pw street main 120.97 163.08 161399 11/07/2013 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Maint 256.51 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Maint 55.00 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Maint 631.62 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:PW Parks Mai 36.35 979.48 161400 11/07/2013 011118 PALM SPRINGS AERIAL Sister Cities excursion 12/4 191.60 191.60 TRAMWAY 161401 11/07/2013 013289 PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM Sister Cities excursion 12/4 120.00 120.00 INC 161402 11/07/2013 014273 PARAGON PARTNERS LTD Relocation services:Murr Crk/Ovrind 1,247.50 1,247.50 161403 11/07/2013 006657 PAYNE, CHRIS ee computer loan prgm 1,999.00 1,999.00 161404 11/07/2013 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 179.40 179.40 INC 161405 11/07/2013 001416 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS INC city benches:third st enhancement 2,90532 2,905.32 161406 11/07/2013 008282 RAMIREZ, ERIKA Reimb:nuts & bolts wkshp 10/24-25 82.59 82.59 161407 11/07/2013 000271 RBF CONSULTING SEPT ENG SRVCS:ULTIMATE 20,043.13 20,043.13 INTERCHANGE Page:8 apChkLst 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161408 11/07/2013 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & ntc exemption:Citywide concrete repairs 50.00 50.00 RECORDER 161409 11/07/2013 016439 ROTARY CLUB OF TEMECULA FY 13/14 Comm Srvc Funding 5,000.00 5,000.00 161410 11/07/2013 012174 RUHNAU RUHNAU CLARKE & Design of Fire Stn 73 upgrade 10,800.00 10,800.00 ASSOC. 161411 11/07/2013 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD Instructor Earnings 770.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 770.00 1,540.00 161412 11/07/2013 013827 RYAN MONTELEONE clean storm drain: julo way 7,500.00 7,500.00 EXCAVATION INC 161413 11/07/2013 007582 SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION SAFEGUARD VISION PLAN PAYMENT 884.36 884.36 161414 11/07/2013 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - SUPPORT PAYMENT 300.00 300.00 CENTRAL 161415 11/07/2013 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Supplies:Mary Phillips Senior Center 265.32 265.32 161416 11/07/2013 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Sep 2-35-403-6337:41375 McCabe Ct 275.66 Oct 2-29-295-3510:32211 Wolf vly rd 1,088.97 Oct 2-28-629-0507:30600 Pauba Rd 9,676.23 Oct 2-02-502-8077:43210 Business Prl 574.12 Oct 2-00-397-5067:TCSD svc lev C 2,451.28 Oct 2-00-397-5042:43200 bus pk dr #1 2,459.41 Oct2-31-936-3511:46488 Pechanga 56.04 Oct 2-31-404-6020:28771 OT front st 1,570.53 Oct 2-29-657-2332:45538 Redwood 26.09 Oct 2-29-953-8447:31738 Wolf vly rd 25.76 Oct 2-31-031-2616:27991 Diaz rd PED 27.82 Oct 2-29-953-8082:31523 Wolf vly rd 28.51 Oct 2-30-220-8749:45850 N Wolf crk d 515.12 Oct2-31-536-3226:28690 Mercedes 1,503.93 Oct 2-30-520-4414:32781 Tern pkwy L 1,018.02 21,297.49 161417 11/07/2013 016282 SOCAL SALES LLC Solar battery: Medics 319.00 319.00 161418 11/07/2013 016438 SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE FY 13/14 Comm Srvc Funding 3,362.00 3,362.00 PAUL 161419 11/07/2013 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control services: pbsp 70.00 70.00 CONTROL INC Page9 apChkLst 11/07/2015 9:58:11AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161420 11/07/2013 005786 SPRINT Sep 26- Oct 25 cellular usage/equip 5,198.09 5,198.09 161421 11/07/2013 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC Refreshments: volunteer recognition 510.08 510.08 161425 11/07/2013 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE MANDATORY LIFE INSURANCE 9,223.26 9,223.26 COMPANY PAYMENT 161426 11/07/2013 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE 735.60 735.60 COMPANY PAYMENT 161427 11/07/2013 016284 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF TCSD Instructor Earnings 140.00 INSTRUCTION TCSD Instructor Earnings 168.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 420.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 560.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 350.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 336.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 189.00 2,163.00 161428 11/07/2013 009061 STURDIVANT, ANGELA P. TCSD Instructor Earnings 205.80 205.80 161429 11/07/2013 009811 SUNNY HILLS TOWING INC VEHICLE TOWING SERVICES: TEM. 375.75 POLICE VEHICLE TOWING SERVICES: TEM. 405.00 780.75 161430 11/07/2013 010924 T & D COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Cabling:Fire Stn 95 387.83 387.83 161431 11/07/2013 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL SEPT CONSULTING SRVCS:WNCHSTR 93,461.53 RD/115 SEPT CONSULTING SRVCS:F.VLY P 205,336.02 298,797.55 161432 11/07/2013 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD Misc supplies:crc 33.34 SRVCS Supplies:Mary Phillips Senior Center 83.76 117.10 161433 11/07/2013 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION DUES PAYMENT 4,702.00 4,702.00 161434 11/07/2013 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS Veh repair & maint:police motorcycles 866.16 LLC Veh repair & maint:police motorcycles 1,069.90 1,936.06 161435 11/07/2013 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER FY 13/14 2nd qtr op.agrmnt:eco dev 33,750.00 33,750.00 OF 161436 11/07/2013 009194 TEMECULA VALLEY NEWS Oct advertising: theater 658.72 658.72 161437 11/07/2013 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON misc plumbing supplies: crc 1.68 1.68 COMPANY Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 161438 11/07/2013 003862 THYSSENKRUPP Oct -Dec elev inspection srvcs:City facs 4,200.00 4,200.00 ELEVATOR.BRNCH 37 161439 11/07/2013 016311 TIERCE, NICHOLAS GRAPHIC DESIGN SRVCS:THEATER 2,925.00 2,925.00 161440 11/07/2013 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Nov high speed internet:42081 Main st 64.06 Nov high speed internet:Library 505.48 Nov high speed internet:40135 Village 235.47 805.01 161441 11/07/2013 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL misc equip parts:pw street maint 39.28 39.28 161442 11/07/2013 001561 U S A MOBILITY WIRELESS INC paging/rental svcs:PW 10.79 10.79 161443 11/07/2013 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE Sept'13 postage meter deposit 2,237.02 2,237.02 161444 11/07/2013 014413 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF SUPPORT PAYMENT 277.83 277.83 EDUCATION 161445 11/07/2013 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE Oct undrgrnd svcs alert tickets:PW 156.00 156.00 ALERT 161446 11/07/2013 000325 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY CHARITIES PAYMENT 25.00 25.00 161447 11/07/2013 004864 V N W CIRCLE OF CARE INC FY 13/14 Comm Srvc Funding 5,000.00 5,000.00 161448 11/07/2013 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 10/16-11/15 broadband 880.80 880.80 161449 11/07/2013 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC Sept On -call engineering srvcs:pw 8,303.15 8,303.15 161450 11/07/2013 014781 WILLIAMS ARCHITECTS, INC SEPT-OCT DSGN SRVCS:TCC 4,500.00 RENOVATION REIMBURSABLES:TCC RENOVATIOI 74.66 4,574.66 161451 11/07/2013 009512 WURMS JANITORIAL Nov janitorial srvcs:City facs 19,131.54 SERVICES, INC Nov janitorial srvcs:police old town 242.25 19,373.79 161452 11/07/2013 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL Reimb:benefit concert/wrkshp/mtg 296.27 296.27 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 1,331,997.79 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 11/07/2013 9:58:11AM CITY OF TEMECULA 146 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,331,997.79 Page:12 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Liability Insurance Policy Extension PREPARED BY: Roberto Cardenas, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve a seven month pro rata liability and excess liability insurance policy extension with Travelers Indemnity Company/Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (Travelers), in the amount of $116,138, for the period of December 1, 2013 through July 1, 2014. BACKGROUND: On November 27, 2012, the City Council approved liability and excess liability insurance with Travelers Indemnity Company/Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (Travelers) in the amount of $199,893, for the period of December 1, 2012 through December 1, 2013. In order to improve administrative and budgetary efficiencies, the City determined it was necessary to align the various insurance policy (Liability, Property, and Workers Compensation) expiration dates with the fiscal year. Therefore, staff requested the City's insurance broker, Brown & Brown, Inc., to extend the City's current policy with Travelers to July 1, 2014. In response, Brown & Brown, Inc. obtained a seven month pro rata premium as outlined below. LIABILITY INSURANCE Company Period Premium Travelers 12/01/12 to 12/01/2013 $199,893* Travelers 12/01/13 to 07/01/2014 seven month pro rata extension $116,138* Total $ 316,031 * Includes Excess Liability Insurance and optional Terrorism Risk Insurance. The pro rata extension policy submitted by Travelers continues to provide coverage of $10 million per Occurrence and $10 million Aggregate with a self -insured retention of $150,000. The City elected to continue to purchase terrorism coverage to cover third party bodily injury and property damage should a certified act of terrorism occur. To ensure Travelers continues to have sufficient financial capacity to provide the necessary policy limits to insure the City's risks, Brown & Brown, Inc. utilized the services of A.M. Best to assess their financial strength and creditworthiness. A.M. Best assigned a Financial Strength Rating (FSR) of "A+" (Superior) to Travelers based on their ability to meet their ongoing insurance policy and contractual obligations (after a comprehensive evaluation of their balance sheet strength, operating performance, and business profile). In addition, A.M. Best assigned Travelers a Financial Size Category (FSC) of "XV" ($2 billion or greater) based on their policyholder's adjusted surplus. Considering the City's increasing exposure associated with growth and increased activities, staff recommends the City accept Travelers pro rata extension proposal in the amount of $116,138, for coverage from December 1, 2013 through July 1, 2014. The schedule below reflects liability and excess liability insurance premiums for the past eight years (with $10 million coverage). The liability premium for this year represents a decrease from the previous year of $19,206. The decrease is primarily due to Traveler's willingness to write the excess liability level more competitively. Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Premium $278 901 $252,779 $222,068 $206,636 $200,498 $204,284 $219,099 $199,893 Limits As reflected above, although the City has continued to grow, the premiums have remained steady. FISCAL IMPACT: insurance fund. Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the fiscal year 2013-2014 ATTACHMENT: Insurance Proposal for City of Temecula Brown & Brown, Inc. INSURANCE PROPOSAL For CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC ENTITY GENERAL, AUTOMOBILE, MANAGEMENT, EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, LAW ENFORCEMENT, EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION & UMBRELLA LIABILITY Coverage Period: 12-1-13 to 7-1-14 (A Seven Month Pro -Rats Extension of the Expiring 12-1-12/13 Policy) Presented by: Michael G. Bush Senior Vice President October 23, 2013 California Insurance License OB02587 2401 E. Katella Ave., Suite 550 Anaheim, CA 92806 P.O. Box 6989 Orange, CA 92863 714/ 221-1800 800/228-7975 714/ 221-4196 Fax IMPORTANT NOTICE DISCLAIMER Disclaimer: This proposal/policy presented is based upon the exposures to loss made known to the agency. Any changes in these exposures (i.e. new operations, new products, additional state of hire, etc.) need to be promptly reported to our agency in order that proper coverage(s) may be put in place. The proposal contains only a general description of the coverage(s) and does not constitute a policy / contract. For complete policy information, including exclusions, limitations and conditions, refer to the policy document. Specimen policy forms and endorsements are available upon request. Travelers Indemnity Company/Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut ❑ Non -Admitted Carrier Taxes & Fees: $ N/A Minimum Earned Premium: N/A % Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company See Excess Coverage ® Non -Admitted Carrier Taxes & Fees: Premium Section Minimum Earned Premium: 25 % Higher Limits may be available upon request V Automobile Premium is subject to audit based on a rate of $200.86 + 117.30 = $318.16 per vehicle unit Premiums include Terrorism Coverage Options CARRIERS Travelers Indemnity Company (Umbrella/Excess) Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut 1. (Travelers Insurance Companies) 2. Travelers Indemnity Company (Umbrella/Excess) 3. Please read your policy for specific details. A.M. BEST RATING A+: XV; Admitted A+: XV; Admitted The information obtained from A.M. Best's Rating is not in any way a warranty or guaranty by Brown & Brown, Inc. of the financial stability of the insurer and this information is current only as of the date of publication. THIS FORM IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS 12-1-2012 to 7-1-2014 City of Temecula Proposal NAMED INSURED City of Temecula Temecula Community Services District Oversight Board and The Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula Temecula Public Financing Authority Temecula Housing Authority THIS FORM IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS 12-1-2012 to 7-1-2014 City of Temecula Proposal PUBLIC ENTITY GENERAL, AUTOMOBILE, MANAGEMENT, EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, LAW ENFORCEMENT, EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION & UMBRELLA LIABILITY Discuss Markets Available (As of 12-1-12) A. Major Carriers Providing Municipal Coverage 1. Travelers Insurance Company 2. Chartis (Lexington) Insurance Company 3. Genesis Insurance Company 4. Markel Insurance Company (Excess) 5. Ironshore Insurance Company (Excess) 6. Everest National Insurance Company 7. Munich American Insurance Company 8. ACE Public Entity Insurance (Illinois Union Insurance Company) 9. Zurich Insurance Company (Note — No longer writing Municipal Coverage in California) 10. Clarendon America Insurance Company (Note — No Longer Writing Municipal Coverage) Travelers Insurance Company A. Policy Review (Per Expiring) Occurrence Form (except Employee Benefit Plans Administration Liability — Claims Made) 2. Exclusions - Review Individual Coverage Parts Also Attached: Coverage Part Public Entity General Liability: $1,000,000 Occurrence and Aggregate (General Aggregate, Products Completed Operations Aggregate) a. Back-up Sewers & Drains (Negligent k. Lead Exclusion Acts) Included: $1,000,000 Limit I. Unsolicited Communication b. Failure to Supply Utility Services Exclusion Included: $1,000,000 Sublimit m. Terrorism Exclusion unless C. Mold, Fungi, or Bacteria Exclusion purchased d. Injury to Voluntary Firefighters n. Healthcare Professional Exclusion Liability:EMT's, Nurses & e. Injury to Fellow Employees Exclusion + Social Services Professionals Employers Liability Exclusion Included f. Medical Expense(Without Liability) o. Abuse or Molestation Coverage Exclusion Included $1,000,000 OCC/ g. Eminent Domain and Inverse $2,000,000 AGG Condemnation Exclusion p. Premises Damage 300,000 h. Asbestos Exclusion Limit i. War Exclusion q. Property Damage j. Employment Practices Liability Change/Intellectual Property Exclusion Exclusion r. Discrimination Exclusion S. Public Entity Xtend THIS FORM IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS 12-1-2012 to 7-1-2014 City of Temecula Proposal Endorsement t. Pollution Exclusion U. Consumer Financial Protection Laws Exclusion Also Attached: Coverage Part Public Entity Law Enforcement Liability: $1,000,000 Occurrence and Aggregate a. Injury to Employees and Volunteers Exclusion b. Employment Related Practices Exclusion Also Attached Coverage Part Management Liability: ($1,000,000) Occurrence and Aggregate a. Healthcare Professional Services and Law Enforcement Activities Exclusion b. No Exclusion for Architects, Engineers or Lawyers C. Eminent Domain Exclusion d. Board Exclusions for Airports, Healthcare Facilities, Port Authorities, Transit Authorities, Gas, Electric, Schools, School Districts and JPA's Also Attached Coverage Part Public Entity Employee Benefit Plan Administration Liability: $1,000,000 Occurrence and $3,000,000 Aggregate (Retroactive Date: None) Also Attached Coverage Part Public Entity Employment Practices Liability: ($1,000,000) Occurrence and Aggregate a. Declaratory, Injunctive or Other Non -Monetary Relief Costs (with duty to defend government admin hearings seeking injunctive relief) Exclusion b. Defense Expenses Included Within Limit of Liability C. Damages include Attorneys' Fees of Person making claim if the Protected Person is legally required to pay under the law which was violated d. Punitive Damages covered up to full policy limits, if allowed by law. Also Attached Coverage Part Public Entity Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 Occurrence and No Aggregate a. Injury to Volunteer Workers, including Volunteer Firefighters Exclusion b. Injury to a Fellow Employee Exclusion C. Professional Services Exclusion d. Rate: 318.16 Per Power Unit (Auditable) Also Attached Coverage Part Public Entity Umbrella/Excess Liability: ($9,000,000) Occurrence and Aggregate over Public Entity General (including Sexual Abuse and Molestation), Law Enforcement, Employee Benefit Plan Administration, Automobile Liability (only) (Aggregate does not apply to Automobile Liability), and Employers Liability Occurrence and Aggregate over preceding coverage, plus Public Entity Management and Employment Practices Liability — SEE NOTE THIS FORM IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS 12-1-2012 to 7-1-2014 City of Temecula Proposal a. Healthcare Professional Services Exclusion — Limited Following Form Public Entities b. Asbestos Exclusion C. Mold, Fungi, or Bacteria Exclusion d. Public Use of Property Exclusion (Eminent Domain) e. Uninsured and Underinsured Auto Exclusion f. Lead Exclusion g. Unsolicited Communication Exclusion h. Injury to Volunteer Firefighters Exclusion i. Failure to Supply Utility Services Exclusion j. Pollution Exclusion k. Consumer Financial Protection Laws Exclusion I. Terrorism Exclusion (unless purchased) m. Property Damage Change/Intellectual Property Exclusion n. War Exclusion o. Discrimination Exclusion p. Amendment of Contractual Liability Exclusion q. Amendment of Watercraft or Aircraft Exclusion r. Amendment of Damage to Property Exclusion S. Amendment of Damage to Your Work Exclusion NOTE: Retained Limit Any One Occurrence or Offense: $10,000 B. Limit of Liability — Per Coverage Parts above C. The Limits of Liability are excess over the Self -Insured Retention D. Defense Costs — Are within the Self -Insured Retention and within the Limits of Liability. THIS FORM IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS 12-1-2012 to 7-1-2014 City of Temecula Proposal III. 12 Month Premium and Quotation — Additional 7 Months Extension A. Travelers Indemnity Company; Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (Travelers Insurance Companies) (A+: XV; Approved, Admitted) B. Term: 12-01-12/7-1-14 (Annual Policy Period Extended by Endorsement) C. Form: Occurrence D. Limit/Coverage 12-1-12/13 Premium $1,000,000 Per Event or Wrongful Act or Combination $197,914* of Event and Wrongful Act and $1,000,000 Total Limit (Aggregate), Excess Over Self -Insured Retention Extension 12-1-13 to (S.I.R.) Public Entity General (Including Bodily Injury, 7-1-14 Property Damage, Personal Injury, Advertising Injury, Premium Products & Completed Work Liability), Health Care $114,988* Professional (EMT's, Nurses, Social Services Professionals), Law Enforcement, Employment Practices, Management, Automobile (No Aggregate), and Umbrella Liability $3,000,000 Total Limit (Aggregate) Per Wrongful Act Public Entity Employee Benefit Plans Administration Liability $9,000,000 Per Event or Wrongful Act or Combination of Event and Wrongful Act and $9,000,000 Total (Aggregate) Excess over above underlying limits. *Purchased(Optional) Terrorism Risk Insurance Act Coverage $1,979: 12-1-12/13 $1,150: 12-1-13/7-1-14 E. Self -Insured Retention: $150,000 Each Event or Wrongful Act Including Loss & Loss Expense F. Previous Years' Premium Comparisons (not including TRIA or taxes & fees) (1)2000 (b)2001 c 2002 c 2003 c 2004 c 2005 c 2006 d 2007 d 2008 d 2009 d 2010 d 2011 e 2012 to 7/2014 Total Premium $102,999 $140,291 $199,000 $208,000 $202,000 $206,687 $195,000 $169,882 $157,684 $152,379 $160,961 $175,630 $197,914+ 114,988 = $312,902 Primary Limits Retention (a) Limit -20 mil Occ/24 mil Agg GL; 20 mil occ/20 mil Agg E&O; 20 mil Auto Occ $ 50,000 (b) Limit -15 mil Occ/19 mil Agg GL; 15 mil occ/15 mil Agg E&O 15 mil Auto Occ $100,000 (c) Limit - 5 mil Occ/5 mil Agg Pers Inj Liab, Prod -Comp Ops, E&O/5 mil Auto Occ$150,000 (d) Limit — 5 mil Occ/5 mil Agg GL & Law Enforcement/5 mil Agg Management Liability 5 mil Agg EPL/5 mil Auto Occ $150,000 (e) Limit — 10 mil Occ/10 mil Agg GL, Law Enforcement, Management and EPL Liability/10 mil Auto Occ $150,000 Includes Employment Practices Liability THIS FORM IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS 12-1-2012 to 7-1-2014 City of Temecula Proposal Important Information Compensation: In addition to the commissions or fees received by us for assistance with the placement, servicing, claims handling, or renewal of your insurance coverages, other parties, such as excess and surplus lines brokers, wholesale brokers, reinsurance intermediaries, underwriting managers and similar parties, some of which may be owned in whole or in part by Brown & Brown, Inc., may also receive compensation for their role in providing insurance products or services to you pursuant to their separate contracts with insurance or reinsurance carriers. That compensation is derived from your premium payments. Additionally, it is possible that we, or our corporate parents or affiliates, may receive contingent payments or allowances from insurers based on factors which are not client -specific, such as the performance and/or size of an overall book of business produced with an insurer. We generally do not know if such a contingent payment will be made by a particular insurer, or the amount of any such contingent payments, until the underwriting year is closed. That compensation is partially derived from your premium dollars, after being combined (or "pooled") with the premium dollars of other insureds that have purchased similar types of coverage. We may also receive invitations to programs sponsored and paid for by insurance carriers to inform brokers regarding their products and services, including possible participation in company - sponsored events such as trips, seminars, and advisory council meetings, based upon the total volume of business placed with the carrier you select. We may, on occasion, receive loans or credit from insurance companies. Additionally, in the ordinary course of our business, we may receive and retain interest on premiums you pay from the date we receive them until the date the premiums are remitted to the insurance company or intermediary. In the event that we assist with placement and other details of arranging for the financing of your insurance premium, we may also receive a fee from the premium finance company. Questions and Information Requests: Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office at 1-800-228-7975 or, if you prefer, submit your question or request online at www.bbsocal.com This proposal contains only a general description of the coverage(s) and does not constitute a policy/ contract. For complete policy information, including exclusions, limitations, and conditions, refer to the policy document. This proposal is based upon the exposures to loss made known to the Agency. Any changes in these exposures (i.e., new operations, new products, additional states of hire, etc.) need to be promptly reported to us in order that proper coverage(s) may be put into place. THIS FORM IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. READ YOUR POLICY FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS 12-1-2012 to 7-1-2014 City of Temecula Proposal VEHICLE SCHEDULE CITY OF TEMECULA Liability Vehicle Schedule (12-01-12/7-1-14) VEHICLE VIN PHYSICAL DAMAGE HAULS OTHERS 1 1990 Dodge Maxi Van 2B5WB35Z8LK769631 2 1992 GMC Top Kick Breathing Support(F) 1 GDP7H1 J502955 Yes 3 1995 Sentry Pumper (F) 4ENRAAA86S1004369 Yes 4 1996 Ford Utility Truck 1 FTHX25HIVEA52787 5 1997 GMC Savana Van 1GTHG35R3V1034278 6 1997 GMC Sierra Pick-up 1GTHK34R7VF012996 7 1998 Patch Truck 1 HTSCAAN8WH550494 8 1998 Ford Windstar Van (1-8 Pass.) 2FMZA5145WBD50410 Yes 9 1999 Dodge Ram Truck (TCC) (FP) 3B7HC12YXXG187157 10 1999 Chevy Pick -Up Truck 1 GBGC24R3XR709218 11 1999 Chevy Pick-up 1 GCGK29R7XF033865 12 2000 Ford Ranger Truck 1 FTYR 1 4X9YPA63039 13 1999 Dodge Ram Pick -up 3B7HC12Y8XG187156 14 —(FP) 2000 Dodge Pick-up 3B7HF12YXYG117182 15 2000 Ford F150 Pick-up 1 FTRX181-3YKA37177 16 2001 GEM Vehicle 5ASAG474X1 F012456 17 2001 Jeep Cherokee 1J4FF48S711-542308 18 2001 Ford Pick-up 1 FTYR14U81 PA39245 19 2001 Ford 550 (Utility Truck) (Med.) 1 FDAF56F71 EA81705 20 2001 Ford 550 (Boom Truck) (Med.) 1 FDAF56F81 EA24722 Yes 21 2001 Chevy Pick-up 16CEK19V21 E238554 22 2001 Ford Utility Truck (Med.) 1 FDAF56F91 EB60874 Yes 23 2001 Dodge Durango (FP) 1 B4HS28NX1 F578823 24 2002 Ford Ranger Pick-up Truck 1 FTYR14UX2PA21184 25 2002 Elec. GEM Vehicle (F) 5ASAK27452FO31405 26 2002 Elec. GEM Vehicle (F) 5ASAG47472FO23190 27 2002 Chevy Pick-up Truck 1GCGK13U32F142274 28 2002 Ford F150 Truck 1 FTRX18W72NA62633 29 F2002 Ford F150 Truck 1 FTRX18W52NA62954 30 2002 Ford F550 (Med.) (Rescue) (F) 1FDAX56F92EB25749 Yes mbzollzpc 1 of 6 CITY OF TEMECULA Liability Vehicle Schedule (12-01-1217-1-14) VEHICLE VIN PHYSICAL DAMAGE HAULS OTHERS 31 2002 Ford F150 Truck 1FTRW08662KB68781 32 2003 Ford Ranger Truck (FP) 1 FTZR15E53PA56244 33 2003 Ford F150 Truck 1 FTZR15E73PA56245 34 2003 Ford F150 Truck 2FTRX18WO3CA32042 35 2003 Ford F150 Truck 2FTRX18W93CA32041 36 2003 Ford F550 Truck (Med.) 1 FDAF56F23EA94199 Yes 37 2003 Ford F350 Van 9-20 Pass. 1 FBSS31 LX3HA48533 Yes 38 2003 Ford F250 Truck (FP) 3FTNX21L03MB16676 39 2003 Chevy CG33803 1GBJG31U831209119 40 2005 GMC Savanna Cargo Van 1 GTHG35UX51183677 41 2003 Ford 550 Med. Rescue F 1 FDAX56FO3EB25804 Yes 42 2004 Ford Ranger 1 FTZR1 5EX4PA26822 43 2004 Ford Ranger FP 1FTZR15E14PA26823 44 2004 Ford F150 Truck 1FTRX14WX4NA82402 45 2004 Ford F150 Truck 1FTRX14W84NA82401 46 2004 Toyota Prius (Hybrid) JTDKB20U540077678 47 2004 KME Fire Aerial FT F K9AF42884NO58774 Yes 48 2004 Int'I Multipurpose Utility Truck (Med. Dump) 1 HTWNAOT64JO93129 Yes 49 2005 GMC Sierra 2500 (FP) 1GTHK29U35E223576 50 2005 GMC Pick-up 1GTEC19VO5Z230349 51 2005 GMC Sierra 1500 1 GTEC19V35Z226666 52 2005 Smeal Fire Engine F 4S7CT2D956CO54456 Yes 53 2005 Chevy Impala 1G1WF52E559203793 54 2005 Chevy Trailblazer 1GNET16S456108449 55 2006 Freightliner Towing Truck (F) 1 FVACWCS86HW91952 Yes 56 2006 Ford F-150 Truck 1 FTPX12506KC01905 57 2006 Ford F-550 Pick-up (Med.) 1 FDAF56P56ED20121 58 2006 Ford F-350 Pick-up 1 FDWX30536EB79936 59 2006 Ford Expedition 1FMPU16576LA25220 60 2006 El Dorado 26 Passenger Bus 21-60 Pass. 1 GBG5V1 E75F513455 Yes Yes 61 2006 Ford Ecoline Van (1-8 Pass.) 1FTRE14WO6DB36806 Yes 62 2007 Ford F-150 Truck 1 FTRX12W77FA29769 63 2007 Ford F-150 Truck 1 FTRX12W37FA32393 64 2007 Ford F150 Truck Park Ranger) 1 FTRX14W67NA26641 65 2007 Ford F250 Truck (FP) 1 FTSW21547EB16523 66 2007 Ford F150 Truck FP 1FTRX12W27NA26638 67 2007 Dodge Ram Truck (Land Dev) 1 D7HU18N97J544861 68 2007 Dodge Ram Truck Land Dev 1 D7HU 1 8N07J544862 691 2007 Dodge Ram Truck (Land Dev) 1 D7HU 1 8N27J544863 70 2007 Dodge Ram Truck 1D7HU18N47J544864 mb20112pc 2 of 6 CITY OF TEMECULA Liability Vehicle Schedule (12-01-12/7-1-14) VEHICLE VIN PHYSICAL DAMAGE HAULS OTHERS 71 2007 Ford Escape Hybrids (P) 1 FMYU49H57KB87852 72 2007 Ford Escape Hybrids (P) 1 FMYU49H77KB87853 73 2007 Ford Escape Hybrids (P) 1 FMYU49HX7KB96546 74 2007 Ford F-150 Truck 1 FTRX12W07NA26640 75 2007 Ford F350 Truck 1 FDWX36P57EB16525 76 2007 Altec Aerial Boom Truck (Traffic)(Med.) 1 GDG5C1 G97F405242 Yes 77 2007 Ford F-150 Truck 1 FTRX12W47NA26639 78 2008 Ford Ranger 1 FTZR45E25PA43864 79 2008 Ford F150 Truck 1 FTPX14W88FA65176 80 2008 Ford F350 Utility Truck 1 FDWX345X8ED09174 81 2008 Ford F350 Utility Truck 1 FDWX34588ED13286 82 2008 Ford F350 Utility Truck 1 FDWX30528EE41755 83 2008 Ford Expedition (FP) 1 FMFK6548LA81345 84 2008 Harley Davidson Motorcycle (P) 1HDFHM188Y673859 85 2007 Honda Motorcycle (P) JH2SC51717M500039 86 2008 BMW Motorcycle (P) WB103880782112332 87 2009 Ford F250 Pick -Up (P) 1 FTSX20Y59EA01537 Yes mbzollzpc 3 of 6 CITY OF TEMECULA Liability Vehicle Schedule (12-01-1217-1-14) VEHICLE VIN PHYSICAL DAMAGE HAULS OTHERS 88 2009 Ford F-150 1 FTRX1 2V09FA1 3200 89 2009 Hot Patch Truck 1HTWCAAR29J196473 Yes 90 2009 Honda Motorcycle P JH2SC51789K600413 91 2009 Honda Motorcycle (P) JH2SC51719K600642 92 2009 Honda Motorcycle P JH2SC51789K600637 93 2009 Honda Motorcycle (P) JH2SC51749K600635 94 2009 Honda Motorcycle P JH2XC51769K600636 95 2011 Honda Motorcycle (P) JH2SC5176BK700192 96 2011 Honda Motorcycle P JH2SC5176BK700175 97 2011 Honda Motorcycle (P) JH2SC5170BK700169 98 2011 Honda Motorcycle P JH2SC5170BK700172 9912011 Honda Motorcycle (P) JH2SC5171BK700004 TRAILERS 100 1991 Big TX Trailer 16VAX1020MIC14047 101 1991 Light Tower Trailer 8309 102 1992 Arrow Board Trailer 9891 103 1993 Hydro Utility Trailer 1 H9BCP167P1120905 104 1993 Flatbed Trailer(City Float 13AH13203PC768415 105 1994 Kustom Signals Radar Trailer (P) 1 K9BS0811 RK118177 106 1997 Eagle Command Post Trailer P 1 U9T10P20V1016022 Yes 107 1997 Texas Bragg Utility Trailer 17XFP1223V1970250 108 1997 Texas Bragg Utility Trailer P 17XFP1822V1973883 109 1997 Pace American Cargo Trailer (P) 4P2FB0819V0006254 110 1997 Big TX Trailer 16VPX1625VIE9300 111 1998 Kendon Motorcycle Trailer (P) 4G44S0811 WA000711 112 1998 Wells Caro Shelter Trailer EOC 1WC200E17W1002027 113 1999 Wanco Arrow Board Trailer 1 W91 S1019X1249336 114 1999 Wanco Arrow Board Trailer 1 W91 S1 01 1X1249332 115 2000 Hydro Trailer/Sandblaster 1 H9CSC251 Y1 120390 116 2001 Zieman Trailer & Vibratory Roller 1ZCT20E201ZP23612 117 2003 SMART Trailer (P) 1 K9BS08133K118043 118 2004 Interstate ATV Trailer P 4RACS16214KO04152 119 2004 Victor Trailer (F) 1V9EN22444C084086 120 2004 Charmac Cargo Trailer F 4RYC322094T110951 Yes 121 2004 Interstate ATV Trailer (P) 4RACS18214KO04410 122 2005 Zieman Carrier Backhoe Trailer 1ZCE34E2X5ZP26052 123 2005 Radar Trailer (P) 1 K9BM11124G118033 124 2005 Carson Trailer 4HXRC16225CO97897 125 2006 Magnum Light Tower Trailer 5AJLS16186B004887 126 2006 Magun Light Trailer P 5AJLS161X6B004888 127 2006 PACE Trailer (Posse) (P) 4P2FB10156U075137 128 2006 Pacific Boat Trailer 40R1A1 BB36AO24706 129 2007 Solar Tech Message Board Trailer 4GM1 MO91371453371 mb20112pc 4 of 6 CITY OF TEMECULA Liability Vehicle Schedule (12-01-12/7-1-14) VEHICLE VIN PHYSICAL DAMAGE HAULS OTHERS 130 2007 PACE Trailer 4P2FB12107U085413 131 2007 Interstate Trailer (F) 4RACS12297KO16799 132 2008 Carson Thermoplastic Trailer 4HXSU12168C134420 133 2008 Zieman Trailer 1ZCE19E2X8ZP28102 134 2008 Haulmark Trailer 1GH19B1268A028471 mbzollzpc 5 of 6 CITY OF TEMECULA Liability Vehicle Schedule (12-01-1217-1-14) VEHICLE VIN PHYSICAL DAMAGE HAULS OTHERS 135 2010 Haulmark Trailer 16HPB1425AA035534 136 2010 Haulmark Trailer 16HPB1422AA038043 137 2011 Wells Fargo Trailer F I WF20OF2187039837 1381 2012 Haulmark Kodiak Cargo Trailer (F) 16HPB1427CA041497 Yes 139 2012 Haulmark Kodiak Caro Trailer F 16HPB1426CA041491 Yes 140 2011 Triple L Flatbed Trailer 5DYAA72L3BC005089 Miscellaneous Rolling Stock 141 1997 Honda ATV P 478TE1406VA807745 142 1997 Honda ATV(P) 478TE1400VA807742 143 Cushman 4 Wheel Truckster 1CUNH2227PL000708 Yes 144 2001 Kawasaki Utility Vehicle (Mule) JK1AFCG151B501159 145 2004 Kawasaki ATV P JKSVFJC1X4B501587 146 2004 Kawasaki ATV (P) JKSVFJC124B503124 147 2006 Se wa P 2211021446 148 2006 Segway(P) 2211021439 149 2006 Se wa P 2211021445 150 2006 Segway(P) 2211021437 151 2006 Se wa P 52231014433 152 2006 Segway(P) 52451017629 153 2006 Se wa P 62241021797 154 2007 Bobcat Utility Vehicle A59Z160329032007 155 2007 Kawasaki Utility Vehicle Mule P JKIAFCJ127B510676 Yes 156 2007 Kawasaki Utility Vehicle Mule P IJKIAFCJ137B510945 Yes mb20112pc 6 of 6 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Item No. 5 ACTION MINUTES of November 12, 2013 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District Meeting convened at 7:34 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 15 Action Minutes — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Director Comerchero and Director Roberts absent) Director Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Director Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve the action minutes of October 22, 2013. 16 Temecula Sister City Association Sponsorship Agreement — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Director Comerchero and Director Roberts absent) Director Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Director Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Temecula Sister City Association, in the amount of $7,712, for in -kind staff services, $430 for in -kind facility use, and a $5,000 cash donation to provide cultural exchange services. 17 Additional ADDroDriations for the Tenant ImDrovements and ODerational Costs for use of the Basic Etc. Building for Contract Class Programming — Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-2, Director Comerchero and Director Roberts absent) Director Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Director Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval with two absent. CSD Minutes 111213 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve additional appropriations, in the amount of $155,983, from TCSD Fund Balance for start-up tenant improvements, program costs, and six months of operational costs; 17.2 Approve additional revenue, in the amount of $95,000, in Contract Class Revenue during the six months of operations. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:36 P.M., the Community Services District was formally adjourned to Tuesday, November 26, 2013, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] CSD Minutes 111213 Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Community Development DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: A Zone Change to change the zoning from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO-13) and to create zoning and residential development standards; a Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels; and a Development Plan to construct a residential project on a 22.73 acre site consisting of a 270 unit condominium complex with associated amenities and 49 age restricted single-family lots, located at the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (PA11- 0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) (APNS 961-450-012, 961- 450-013, AND 961-450-003) 2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 13- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0276, A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 13 (PDO-13) ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) 3. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0277, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 57 LOTS FROM THREE EXISTING PARCELS TOTALING 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961- 450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) 4. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0275, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE CONSISTING OF A 270 UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES AND 49 AGE RESTRICTED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: An ordinance for a zoning map amendment to revise the zoning designation from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO-13) on a 22.73 acre site located at the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road. BACKGROUND: The proposed project would allow for the development of 270 market rate condominium units and the creation of lots for 49 age restricted single-family homes on a 22.73 acre site. The project will include a Zone Change to revise the current zoning from Professional Office (PO) to PDO-13, a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the project site, a Development Plan, and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) with a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Staff first presented the project to the Planning Commission on March 20, 2013, with the recommendation that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the project subject to the Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures contained in the EIR. Four public speakers expressed opposition to the project. The opposition was related to traffic and the type of use proposed. Staff responded to the traffic concern by stating that a traffic study was conducted as part of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project. The EIR provided mitigation measures that would successfully lower traffic impacts for the project to a less than significant level. Staff also indicated that office uses, already allowed under the existing zoning, would generate more traffic than the proposed single and multi -family uses. The Planning Commission also expressed concerns at the March 20, 2013 hearing. Commission concerns were related to density, architecture, and the construction timing for the 49 age restricted single-family homes. The Commission determined that the proposed density for the multi -family component was unacceptable when taken separately from the overall project because it exceeded the density range provided by the Temecula General Plan. The proposed project would have had an overall density of 16.5 units per acre. However, if the multi -family component was a stand-alone development, it would have had a density of 24.27 per acre. The High Density (H) designation of the Temecula General Plan provides a density range of 13.0 — 20.0 dwelling units per acre. The Planning Commission also indicated that the architecture for the Monterey style structures and parking garages along Pechanga Parkway contained too much blank wall area and required enhancement. The Planning Commission also sought assurances that the age restricted single-family units would be constructed. Because of these concerns, the project was continued to the April 3, 2013 hearing. The applicant agreed to this continuance. Three public speakers spoke in opposition to the project at the April 3, 2013 hearing. The concerns raised by the public centered on traffic, density, and the conversion of the existing concrete channel to a bio-swale and trail. The Planning Commission discussed the possibility of forming a subcommittee to work with the applicant in addressing project issues related to multi- family density, architecture, and a construction schedule for the age restricted single-family units. However, the Planning Commission elected not to form a subcommittee, and after further discussion of their concerns regarding construction timing for the age restricted single-family units and multi -family architecture, the Planning Commission continued the project to April 17, 2013. The applicant agreed to this continuance. Seven public speakers provided testimony at the April 17, 2013 Planning Commission hearing. Of these, six spoke in opposition and one spoke in favor of the project. The opposition was again related to traffic and the appropriateness of placing apartments in the project area. The speaker in favor of the project stated that apartments would be the best use for the land since office vacancies in the City are over 25%. The applicant has since changed the project to include for sale condominium units instead of apartments. The applicant presented revisions to the Planning Commission on April 17, 2013 that were designed to address concerns raised by the Commission over the previous two meetings. The applicant provided revised architecture for the Monterey style structures and the garages along Pechanga Parkway. The Monterey structures received gabled roof elements and additional pop -outs. These changes helped to create a variable roofline and lessen massing for the structures. The rear of the garages along Pechanga Parkway where also enhanced. Enhancements to these structures included an additional pop -out with a gabled roof element and spandrel glass. The Commission was satisfied with these architectural revisions. The applicant also agreed to a new Condition of Approval intended to guarantee construction of the age restricted single-family homes. This condition required that certain items be completed for the age restricted single-family homes before the first building permit could be issued for the multi -family component of the project. Said Condition of Approval is as follows: PL-37. The following must be completed prior to issuance of building permits for the first multi- family dwelling unit to ensure the construction of the 49 age restricted single-family units: • Record Final Map to include all grading and infrastructure plans of both communities. • Grading, utility, and main road work for both communities shall be done in one phase or in two phases with the age restricted, single-family community done first. • Single -Family Private Street A will be completed and all of the 49 age restricted single-family pads shall be graded to finish elevation. • All infrastructure for utilities for all of the 49 age restricted single-family lots shall be installed. • Perimeter fencing, entry gate, and monument walls for the 49 single-family age restricted lots shall be installed. • The applicant shall pursue and obtain building permits for at least 16 of the age restricted single-family dwelling units, or the applicant may post securities as approved by the Director of Community Development for all of the 49 age restricted single-family dwelling units. The Planning Commission did not believe the added Condition of Approval was enough to provide an assurance that the 49 age restricted single-family homes would be constructed. The Commission also continued to have concerns related to the density of the multi -family component of the project being over the density range permitted by the Temecula General Plan. Due to these concerns, the Commission voted 4-1 at the April 17, 2013 meeting to forward the project to the City Council with a recommendation for denial. The applicant chose not to go to City Council, but instead decided to provide staff with revised plans designed to further address concerns raised at the previous public hearings. The applicant resubmitted plans on August 26, 2013 that provided a multi -family density of 19.56, which is within the range specified in the City of Temecula General Plan (13.0-20.0 units per acre). The project originally proposed the development of 325 market rate multi -family apartment units and the creation of lots for 49 age restricted single-family homes on a 22.73 acre site. The revised project will, as currently proposed, include 270 for sale condominium units and 49 age restricted single family units and will still include a Zone Change to revise the current zoning from Professional Office (PO) to PDO-13, a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the project site, a Development Plan, and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) with a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations. The project was again brought to the Planning Commission on October 2, 2013. Two public speakers provided testimony in support of the project. The first speaker indicated that the revisions made by the applicant since the last hearing were an improvement. The second speaker stated that the project site was close to schools and right for residential development. Chairman Telesio continued to express concern about the project at the October 2, 2013 hearing. This concern was related to the small square footage of the one bedroom condo unit. The square footage breakdown for the project is presented in the table below. Bedrooms/Bathrooms Square Footage (Living Area) 1 Bedroom/1 Bathroom 710 - 794 2 Bedroom/2 Bathroom 961 - 1,142 - 1,162 3 Bedroom/2.5 Bathroom 1,312 - 1,366 - 1,410 In addition, Commissioner Telesio also wanted to be assured that the condominiums would use upgraded internal fixtures. A Condition of Approval was added indicating that an internal home product review will be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to release of building permits. This will ensure upgraded internal fixtures are used in the project. The Commission voted 3-1 (Telesio no) to recommend City Council approval for the project. The applicant has since provided additional information to staff in preparation of the November 26, 2013 City Council hearing. This information consisted of their market evaluation for small condos. Included in this data was sales information of Temecula condominiums with less than 1,000 square feet. Twenty-five of these smaller units have been sold in the City since November of 2011. The applicant stated that this data was obtained through the use of a title company, MLS, and other on-line resources. The applicant has indicated that the target market for the one bed room units will be single home buyers of any age and couples with no children. The applicant also believes the one bedroom units will cost approximately $165,000 when they are ready for sale in about a year to a year and a half. The applicant stated that conventional financing for all the proposed unit types will be available to prospective buyers. ENVIRONMENTAL: A Draft Environmental Impact Report concerning the Project was prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City Council must certify a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project, including a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for noise impacts related to temporary construction. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Plan Reductions 2. City Council Resolution Certifying Environmental Impact Report, Adopting Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Adopting Statement of Overriding Considerations Exhibit A — Findings in Facts in Support of Findings Exhibit B — Mitigation Monitoring Program 3. City Council Ordinance Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Exhibit A — Planned Development Overlay 4. City Council Resolution Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 5. City Council Resolution Development Plan Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 6. Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval for a Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay 7. Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval for a Tentative Tract Map 8. Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval for a Development Plan 9. Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Certification of the Environmental Impact Report and Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations 10. Planning Commission Staff Report of March 20, 2013 http://laserfiche.citvoftemecula.orq/weblink8/2/doc/290456/Page1.aspx 11. Planning Commission Staff Report of April 3, 2013 http:Hlaserfiche.cityoftemecula.org/weblink8/2/doc/291008/Page1.aspx 12. Planning Commission Staff Report of April 17, 2013 http://laserfiche.citvoftemecula.orq/weblink8/2/doc/291766/Pagel .aspx 13. Planning Commission Staff Report of October 2, 2013 http://laserfiche.cityoftemecula.org/weblink8/2/doc/308134/Page1.aspx BELLA Ll N DA IN BELLA LINDA TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA SHEET INDEX: Amn-- TL I &EFi MOFA ro, AEc1.LE<,uwvlEfw+ Aoz aET YCTIor+s as uAnrAErn urar nAru-,+EoaooM ua,s A— BINONG A-1]AFA-CIXLMED—A,pM-LAN°N GIXONAL AI Z --.rann.nYvs Aur.Enrn u IXvnau w* ur°-]PILEt-COIOEEf ELEYw110E6N°PwfyW COIq ML A116 AI E6 rIYONG r-A-EIIX-FLLVS65ECEION].EMIaSH KIFCM rUNNO f-]°-nEIt-RHOE�FLEVw11ON]-YAM9I KI£CM AI h Alh FMAY/ i•TSIL4•IInM[k}A°WXiI1fYr WM4F•MILfA-WLW9YIlY44]Ie1.WYnlnE Atf 10WMgARr IkR]WY/-]MOROGu1JM] pi rIRPW]P6r•]aH]RgKMi4EElrl •Mr.Y►4 few. M] w.]a YLfYO.tl•FM1BLICpB•MnF i114'E].yyf lClSftK.1A'rY+lErtr fca].a-].nuLlawa.caroworlrfrnnns.sEw.tcurnc+a.a•.nrn axa OEM r.ieLlA wwn.nnsaucn.EAW CC1eJHNa WEn1Y, axar nv,o sas r.ixlEi rofnh-anv.EaonlvAno�+1.rAM. cay.A.L AAwnfn awausE-rual»1c IIN+ u1 Alt cwnalaE-Eoof nAN CYML'tiY1�IMNTNEEIa w4c Aan cEu.cuw.<aclaa ¢EwrfcLn au aya ur]clEf MrriNa•RM4 nEYA,A#na 1 c". mxw wEYE..a-MIADrav,nvn w546 OEEltlinllcwR OA°AGE AT En-cOL(ME�EIF/A1pnR A60 ANNE. e1pG aTYASH-MHS, HtvAl10N°6EERIOIA A606 A4HE. °LOG 6TfA°H-CIXOHU EIEYAIpfE rrw. TEHTwIIYE iPILEMV CONCFlLULLGMOW[: fLV. NULTFNAIY °HEFT] C GG[IfIG 11AN MulTLFMYLY LIEfEI C UAl nallNnG Mf. SWCAF fAAYIT SHfET2 CONCEfNAI GNMMl fIN1 E1E1GlE fAAYLY VJI�SC Mf6: 161k1]IARY fNfnNG w1 if if£IYAYYJ[f fl.]fn°J(: nAN R£Il1�IElAIf f1.AN,P.G n.111 L4 iENCEANY WALL H.Y° IIIDIOMEIYC: °IIEETI f11010MElgC dTA AItlO ILS °HEEtI IIIOTOMFIAC ILN! TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP Y1.1 4 ff, � I ,w Faetug Dra m9e Eo.erne I '��:-- lit LOU i iCli 41i Ib, I �I ems 1 I®n �Y iar 0 «E InjleFornilvGrp [ash aaPu! dal'` ° ;� r Inr le ItIT I� LIT tY iil1 S I p tY �i] I i Y �L 1 i� rY i. LOT tIY LOT I 4' Y 11 75 7 LOT 1 Tr Tu _ , 74 ilu� jl °1 — IT. PROJECT SUMMARY: aye` �%/�` •ti' a ` -\ Ji..m,�iu it ��».��. r DATATABLE � �.w»w.� •.�.,�...., o. M � S �" � r ��n»»... n.'.�:;�°-13 1"0,., ` r w�•.i�,a»�ow.r .,.»»..,ru.w"..c Ti .� we SIiE tR33HY� IW�p 4a, V }'� rrr� ...w„ ,,.fit• VICINITY MAP I®I. mRt WIAmkRMM � .»Ww le'M �11�. ~° � - rri.eFo rls..+..+» f�r,m � ••--.• •— n„ ;—T� .I w.aw.un D .avxa "//4[\ \� ., � �f _ � Y•� .. Y,r—.". Ytiti nu mu . r.o _. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN OPT A # SCALE: 1._40�0. ..n., f ...n..n... "0 o�»:c»>r.ea '`'�`,•�� ram- � i a r »rv_„c.... � w.aew,r-,...,uwwau,wa,.a.o—. �� � �� • � url ie Iw,w� BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP 9w� 0.1 �U� w [r Y 11 9]L 205 201[ AO Y." 20= I'W ROLLED 4M —_ ROLLW fLNS M] W I — a m OOTRR SECTION A —A (MULTI —FAMILY) TYPICAL ALLEY SECTION (SINGLE FAMILY) NOT M SGLE ROT m S0 R/W b. R/W FPF Ae ypp p L['1'6' -m AL Cyp9 iu'!�[f U) k TT" IW CF) STREET "A" 55' R/W PRIVATE SRORT LOCAL 6TREET MOOSEO car. Sm W 103 MOT m SCALE R/w R/W 4 x' u' 59[ fm Was i19RIN6 CpR`Rdd W5 I}.--�_-.yI YAJIE6 as LOMA LINDA ROADZrMWW M WANDERM 83' R/W PUBLIC RI00611d1L Co cmR MOOREO CQT. SM. MO. 10.3 ROT m Sr. " TEMECULA LANE 60' R/W PUBLIC mKRAL LOCAL RA] TYP RjR i RY it 1W R lr WE wE MLR 55161M0 00Rp'Rd15 WALR _ _ {f 1K Lu-L Ml^LAC[0 PECHANGA PARKWAY 134' R/W PUBLIC IS m ARTEIRAL G0.T. Sm. M0. MM k R RRT m vdu9 BELLA LINDA L pppppgp y[jpOURO STREET SECTIONS ti 0]191] 9NOLCI NO: IOB]A91 mmmmEMIIIIII TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUPJAo.2 R,9af,un„9 PLAN A4 - FLOOR PLAN jy___ ------ ON + — *0 ► J W-1 on mum PLAN Al - FLOOR PLAN BELLA LINDA APARTMENT UNIT PLANS 1-BEDROOM UNITS qw- MMEAMIIIIII TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUPI ,u�� s1�1 rr Cw �' it F,�ONE L �•) � i �.Zi Si 11i*Tr��� ROOM/JFAS FLWil1Aw5 PLAN B4 - FLOOR PLAN a. uiswm PLAN B3 - FLOOR PLAN Tit T NL o I�:!-,nL PLAN B1 -FLOOR PLAN BELLA LINDA ROORA° APARTMENT UNIT PLANS 2-BEDROOM UNITS yj1: m,a La ° wacLw iwmi TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP 'M � 12 Al SECOND FLOOR PLAN � IW-P& ROOF PLAN -1 IRr-ip LEFT ELEVATION - SPANISH COLONIAL war u . run RIGHT ELEVATION - SPANISH COLONIAL kuc -- W BELLA LINDA I h�- 11 �■l 1;■ slip G � NIll�!f�T1 `r��+,r----rnnn----1rr runs -- rrrrrrrurs`• - ■ru�� ■rE��e--_--rrnr----�n■ run-_-s�innunnurB - BUILDING''' - CROSS SECTION'S' —E:1 - — REAR ELEVATION - SPANISH COLONIAL swE: ire•- ia• FRONT ELEVATION - SPANISH COLONIAL COLORSCHEMEI nor raEs �. aa� m wrwaa aarrMaa +ate. ooa aver"; e"'ae'eirr..rE Mrmar ®ererr4 XEYNUTB Q i wa°rpeme.�r`�ra�rr� rnr n rr�r rase„ x"�`, reamr BUILDING 'A' - CROSS SECTION 'A' —E: ,M a .•- EX4EWQR LIGHTFNG XEYN01ES C1 r"ai.x.wneuwun �r+om'r`+eswrraw.e "" r""rirar r.w sarrexr w.rxrMti'B1 rrer.Err BUILDING A 19-PLEX APARTMENT ELEVATIONS - SPANISH COLONIAL li IeU w WON TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP ;w A14a x�Uxx a axx xx.x LEFT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC scAu:,rt•- iw RIGHT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC BELLA LINDA I ll!., . I NMI I 7m, e I ORION ..... rllmommRr.... tars....... ■!!!•r�•"lillt rltirtli' I=' lica I I BUILDINGS'- CROSS SECTION'S' scue w•- iw REAR ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC —: ve•. 11 FRONT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC scA,r,m-i•-0• COLOR SCHEME 2 .orrm 1a 'a�'iw�.rw ewr as. aas�a...a� �"�• aiq.o�w. wa•w,a � �nwo KEYNOTES Tl i s°"�wniwe�,.e i'miurw_� �RWMaIw,o AI�M� is a s"aawrarrn.° +www BUILDING'S' - CROSS SECTION'A' EXTERIOR LIGHTING KEYNOTES p �� wesiwa�.wan 114.11u�u� fw' Pisµ �Vl.�,arte BUILDING B 20-PLER APARTMENT ELEVATIONS - SPANISH ECLECTIC e iri3 nroxcr no: ioe°rot TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP=°i A1.7b un . LEFT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC xro.w." RIGHT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC BELLA LINDA REAR ELEVATION • SPANISH ECLECTIC FRONT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC COLORSCHEME2 .00rrma aaea:wer w wo.coo�s azaiwaxoo.a evwax �>nn>br BUILDING B 20-PLEA APARTMENT ELEVATIONS - SPANISH ECLECTIC oxtat� � � nmtcrwa irormi TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP" A1.7b LEFT ELEVATION - MONTEREY w<t t•r. rr RIGHT ELEVATION - MONTEREY BELLA LINDA N 1 ! 'sr■�sEEi!!ulE.■ EE■rr;>��� !E!■■■E�rl.�_ :!E!U-!i!rl1r�1 'rA-AIAa•l Ell�AilA!!■ ■!A!r✓4AAl ElIIEIEEIEtIr��._ BUILDING'B' - CROSS SECTION'S' tn'. tw REAR ELEVATION - MONTEREY G W. w FRONT ELEVATION - MONTEREY w l-- COLORSCHEMEE3�3 W,Wa• 0.fW.Alle� wrmr �nmr� KEYNOTES O s �R2�W�eoK sv�ao.,a BUILDING'S' - CROSS SECTION W —1 trw--t•. EXTERIOR LIGHTING KEYNOTES p �1VLL�m®uR BUILDING B 20-PLEX APARTMENT ELEVATIONS - MONTEREY of iru a � reoxrrro roar oot TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP = 'off:1 7c LEFT ELEVATION - MONTEREY RIGHT ELEVATION - MONTEREY BELLA LINDA REAR ELEVATION - MONTEREY scue W . " COLOR SCHEME 7 earam oiraw�'�`su.me ie. aumiwv... wv rc usKi o..r ware � ,.neaa TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP 9N YAYUt BUILDING B 20-PLEX APARTMENT ELEVATIONS - MONTEREY 0719.13 1mi[cr.w. iara� JA1.7c a� 1 -•row�+ t l BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP TOWNHOUSE UNIT PLANS 3-BEDROOM UNITS 0]1D.13 • 1FCT NO: IDD]DDl Ic Q'wj7"W == j& W Wsl ff I I I&W, 0 BELLA LINDA :y BUILDING 'D' &'E' - CROSS SECTION I COLORSCHEMEE�3�� m. a�LMM aMa IMmi ui1MAl9, Ma mmi a�aninw�r re9r m sRaium q� tl'MIIMRM' MURI tl!•\MR moll aWag149i �9,a1>R I¢ ■ia�7hil�r: EXTERIOR UGHTING KEYNOTESO COLORSCHEME2 COLORSCHEMEI KEYNROTEESL] '� Mm '� •9�{�rMdgp s Mme a�u as�siwarwie 9� Nen�iaR�a m >i �u�> ♦ o � i1M1w a� qa 9Rrtm. w�q�wivr 9aRm� 6a�MRi fw j' ����.yy�yRRIRo>wwN[w R>wMtRww 91>fmi 4aM'�alV♦f �v1mi 6�aR�M ♦YMWRN m:iRe,LHapxO. aLLP. RRa Na ~ �Ir �e1RlN91A 9aofm> Oar Mq,R,! aw>wa> Rvgoa,IlMiause�9YIO aiaRwm reR.� ui>w� >11�0°� avRR� • >'wwq'i 1M ru"�'isiR"irr., " 9ww9Mwm i a�w �� �wR, �u��� snw gs�q.>e 1911M1 � RR, 'tea q'W 0.�'�M�M MiWI q'� N NrM� a Oi11M1A1>II/� IRa1�tM>9A1911q 94G�' R1R[RaR\R. W i1r N/� R1R[ � RM�MIIY qIR ,ate p I�Miin119�laYl BUILDING D - 5-PLEX TOWNHOUSE BUILDING ELEVATIONS SPANISH ECLECTIC & MONTEREY o 071913 • Ilrol[CT lq: 109)!pl TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP IA2.2 REAR ELEVATION - MONTEREY sr�: I�-1•a LEFT ELEVATION - MONTEREY SGIE Ili - I' P L: L RIGHT ELEVATION - MONTEREY FRONT ELEVATION - MONTEREY - COLOR SCHEME 3 SCILL 1/R. 1'V BELLA LINDA REAR ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC —1-- a LEFT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC SCMEi IN. I1 RIGHT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC -IN. I,{ FRONT ELEVATION - SPANISH ECLECTIC - COLOR SCHEME 2 vua IT. 1, COLORSCHEME3 ma.ow ntu.m�r �..r-- evom•nw ruaaaemew COLORSCHEME2 BUILDING D - 5•PLE% TOWNHOUSE BUILDING ELEVATIONS SPANISH ECLECTIC & MONTEREY M.M ND>ER LIP. I.—T ■::IaSGLSIP TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP q.Fn1�l.GIL00 111.]dLN]f r.i, BELLA LINDA BUILDING'D' a'E' -CROSS SECTION'B' sou: W. - — I;-dig7nil ! D:'E'- CROSS SECTIONA! COLOR SCHEME 3 COLOR SCHEME I KEYNOTES CJ E) Et I UGHTLN KEYNOTSE �' ia.+wav nrw 1°'' w�r+aa.ws : �'1`ilus�u wrewsnw ww �own.siwa wa ac°°a�uwop° aiw.w.n� wRww� lour wane u� v ww w w wawa: 4w �nws� rrua• nmwml w ^��p11��� w'�o a.�rasn '� a"�iawrrww wl a' nwiwr.� ` � raw m�'ram� a.w.w�rwieo Mltodww � awwvww � awes, nw.nw BUILDING E - 6-PLEX TOWNHOUSE BUILDING ELEVATIONS SPANISH COLONIAL & MONTEREY Of 1911 • 11N1[CT NO: 100I.001 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP JA3 CLUBHOUSE - FLOOR PLAN SGIE. W. - BELLA LINDA CLUBHOUSE TOTAL AREA: 3,438 sq. N- 925 sq N c. CNA Ream loel q n Moi Rmm 3N5 aq-N pNiYn 166 sq N Nubooms ]11 sq N Fo,x 270 p. N Grcvlolon 291 sq h Pordi 167 sq B vvordo 261, N CLUBHOUSE BUILDING PLAN 621r 13 � � rxarEcrra: 1oe�ool TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT &WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP '�" 2z'iA30 CLUBHOUSE - ROOF PLAN oc a W. - BELLA LINDA CLUBHOUSE ROOF PLAN TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP n612"° CLUBHOUSE - LEFT ELEVATION uae yr - Va CLUBHOUSE - RIGHT ELEVATION 9C II4'-1•.0 - BELLA LINDA CLUBHOUSE - REAR ELEVATION 9NE: Ili- I'A CLUBHOUSE - FRONT ELEVATION COLORSCHEME3 m. was nnrnllwlwo wrrain .. Wrm �wl�6 IGYNOTES D CLUBHOUSE BUILDING ELEVATIONS �1319 n e 1\DLCTIQ 10lI 1 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP °• "'^"_� A3,2b EXERCISE BUILDING — LEFT SIDE ELEVATION —E va• - — EXERCISE BUILDING - RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION I_ EXERCISE BUILDING - ROOF PLAN swe vr. ru X 1 �^ -OWN Cp L IT 1 I f -- ----E� EXERCISE BUILDING - LEFT SIDE ELEVATION EXERCISE BUILDING - RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCnIE 1/1' • I•.P... BELLA LINDA EXERCISE BUILDING - REAR ELEVATION scrrE v'. " EXERCISE BUILDING - FRONT ELEVATION COLOR SCHEME �vremll IM aliwliKw.. rlv. asw au�u EXERCISE BUILDING ELEVATIONS Ll— • e n1DLcf— 10 zl TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP°"" mmA4.Ob ...u, ,� COLORSCHEMEI v0'� e`rr�`n.e reramo rmrrona aa"�s,, wi e�rrme a�b�iaR °m0� avww COLORSCHEMET .v we rm rm• ay..iuvvu. e,n owY, nuaran .ai.w u.awar�an COLORSCHEME3 .aa. oe xee aw vx�v wsa� wec�.e.os ro.rm. wrawv e.r rmruwa u>n.i o�w em.rna�. u�arvin a. rmoom r�eiuueK BELLA LINDA FRONT FRONT DETACHED 11-CAR GARAGE AT P/L PLANS, ELEVATIONS & SECTION o>,iv.ia nnxcrro. imm� TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP "" »;u^�A,1O �u o vn�mwa vnawawx a BELLA LINDA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR LOT 50 OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36415 & PA11-0276 CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA a STREET 'A" 55' R/W PRIVATE .w dw Wlrr nl C lux 60 RVAPURLIC T IP. s 9 LOMA LWA ROAD 93' Raw Puad —xm7S2.2 r rl w w FW ARFA PARA■AT BELLA LINDA sxlmlw LNo m r.Irwl uim1. u ! Sp IIaA � rtvl �ulma is .1XI iw luil rwa. lulmnlu a. nw® um AYla .lu x Irsxl®w: wao n�Ilru . rom m ■wla slu x 11A1®A■ra oIs■n�tl �i i mwnR nu x a®.o am olmnr lm) — Imxew s¢Iwu sr ¢¢nla —_.__— Imna m.R■ru ola — rE111 ffi1 �■ �� IYR uA® Lmrv.lunumm Lms-1 IA-01 1 ma roainrs w � rwicl ml� m�riem oi®n awns: n ■omu n na�3 wxnu s ■nx ->m minm mxolx mxlr Fx n'xx LED& DEKRIPTIOe GLIfW I. �b 6lrwle W W 01 iIIE IMeY11 CITMrbn A i] Ilf lm Ylrb. Ix M Ix v M mMY IEmm a e.le mMT. racnu sii sml�niO1ri�Ln mixoa'�isr in�el�i a w"Ira' � a�rl¢ P vlo slwelx mxm seam. wSSE.Sdf■ PAKlI. N■■■Rs -rlo-■L ■1-W-ai ■I -nail 1N✓fTE�415�EARn� tFLIRT I4IR Pmrm EAg]Olf NOTE$ Fl- O• inim�wl.lamrw .wr, ..a ti��.�i„n�m p Ixxltl z; s wlrsa noon m slmao nw� m a I—m M Ilia Wl. © S =I m m ccI1W w lio l mmrle�nlW+L W. m EXISTING EASEIW NDIM O A umr rw nL uxo. moon, a■oo ■w nsNlno sw Ixclmnl II�I.I�VI'121) ■Ifvllll mliNb mFN11w. W�Im ICIK IFIDi RimR M ®W tlrp ■ Pawl xr loll i Arlrhw nccr s■ AI■n 4 WY IOI IxAllc f yr{clk IIft4lSxrRx,1•a.PSRnW.i�. 4N.Af IY Ra�b�1MIR M. O}.IM1RIb x®p ©WaMw} ■NFmin1I-1.I .KT Itt�N0-1 all'll¢YrklLlil[[c MI■MK Iln®, gII�Qp uggt n, SW b INR.FNI M aHMU clK xm■e. R n ei 1ElEalA Q Rol, ® WYIIFI mall IIeR1Wr p1O �i If�1c � �Iat1I INS11x mYlr oolll■r ema-.1 Iwlx rmxr IVA .r M w �w a M Wf s xla.xr R aR Ixl■■fA1E Ix aro• e r elvb wlm:. m s• IIDII Ue ipQ R.1r®LYLIM IVE. i N 6 "{ •YI�IOI'EWx' MO "ilW" Gr111K6 hR bil■ac raltlK f■a., IeA.l. Lr�i Nq..l 4 ewf9s"v"n witmri ee`awc,s'wn M'"0 v.la s [i�itimw A.I�RI�NY}6'YI!Wp +fa111'. 1.11 R— BANK imao lliamn: o mr rlac Isnl utlem rm (w)w-ms city OF TNMECULI s■m ww sear (wl)wsaw F.■ Iwl■Alaus COYIYSS O{'MF07IDYP CORPONAifON ANB IA ROPSRIY GROUP �s1�wI�fIM uns+ Ix s � (r) awin rc Ilw)nri� PLAN■IIWI APPLIEATmTPI Wa PIL-M1:a SHEET 1 li 2 SHEETS ETp11EID FwOff-07.2e 13 III(MU Nb. I(RT WI ■ ■ ■ �■m.Arilwa■5 ■Iwr■ OONwbLTINw oww■•�A�s�Awrsrollar— TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP Iwo x MIJpw ■YIwY•aa. a ewN N■2N.1N0 Fa. ■10.230.■mN `---'----�awu _ nvm Rm mlw oi` '1 1 , 1 y- o '� ' , 4-- ,l9 1 I K:19.9 L 4 ! PL-u h ! ei-7i1 . IL t09 eT 89f'Y4 i .. j I I !l -I.y tri.1tl Iq;+'Ir f!..tw.J� NBZ 4 4 wy .7J Il' R, .Ty.6 P[. t>. n , •/.s r vt . , : J. 0l .I� .,. •90.9 �"i'F•,e" FIE•IN, Y Pltyh i j �.�{_.:'Y.• h,• /7 I + W .r �i '; _ ,li `. -y,� _ _ ki I.. { , �I S_.. _ !-_ .YI fr �j•!Y L_l�• r :rd ,lF s0 AT 47 - 15 r +C-it n - Fl . PF.•8i.0 \PC-9] ] 10, i 9E•99,4 Pi: 80 i t4 p.4 IA 7 i ``� �. 3 1V xu ai I u }7 40 47 44 7 I. e..® f /" PC*77,9 I .PC•{� I PT .1 IY-1- .0'tj. I l i. : / , •1 .7T.0 L ; PE+lye jll se'. •7U.9 I'k'-80.0 1T Itl I' 41i I. IPP e 1 ill _� .tn' i. MIAMI I.MAW --T I NAw. wrf e7anc wn e r ! l FF-9s.os t rE-n.s I NOW nN71 oP,P 1 7'^ KI'"1 k 1.Y•,r.1` h+0,•0lPc� wvn, \w, YI Mpu, ip PERVDA PAVMlO BECTION . 1- •ra.mnr..�mwlu,waw wh ��. BELLA LINDA — I i '. IL�S LRT4hM fl. It r I �, elrr wa �� mu ewv nfalw aecw, — RR. PPIIW WIYIm PW I„fY,l 25 _ / h7e 17fw,P, K - ISS ti y r Rptsa nlsra a,ce n r RfaNnP u7r a awr LK , KIPK® AfRP ti �,•' 114,J14 h � I'V01'Pe1G itPY PM - 4 r i• r ' � SL rwC1 fa"1 A ! ADO,TI - rr : r.mosrn r<n �f yy ! }nr ,unlo a1Purt � � iC is a) � v � cM-SIR LW Ix11�E O• PLANING APPLICATIW IIU PAII-11276 Pi= MAPA F•fy, J SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS Yi r�Ii • • • 0721,.13 P cl wo W6T.nn1 ..� t' GONPIJLTIN• ,w,.+v,a �• ' TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUPxi F "� BELLA LINDA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR LOTS 1-49 OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36415 & PA11-0276 CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA a TYPI� *w ESECTF M Ip E u' [wsI� a °Rf+YI i drt+�s' pi SMEEr -A- 55' R�RI VA TE w!"Noce M i�YECULA LANE '» fi0 R/W PUBLIC dr 0>!IW II � wlww■ PCprArNOA A'AiNL91YlY MiL BELLA LINDA maE�omlalul I :. WWI Ib LMo las, aoua II lyYselYO NIlr Mrs{aNM- I¢11W eil� ■m 7 aNai, ew4* W YLII sYR III a. 10® Ym ODYI¢ .RL ¢ IIOYIEFO IN, wlOo YLII■YII I !� ■In IOnI¢ .N1 F wwIEFP R�F SlwmMl T V ) Ym olmmr (Ylwl xi.. �•air� n�iwm. tiao-eu r '�a�ra i ss"ir..jo�r 1 n,rl mrca+IVI a Pn+to ai artu. BPPwuw awsnr +r ns to n■u �■xtl's WI¢ - 1901 mlll¢ xn10■I¢ mnr IN[ Iwbr 11� a■OYI¢ wF6lI Ibl¢ r®trT l.Efi1L DFTIIEIIPiIOt Ixy'IFATIIME IS ]d' � 6 orF�x9! ■II02. 1n1� wml 1 lb a ¢ YLIlrru. Y'ial n w. a rNr",°L'l:"sierol : �rr',Rr' n�"ue'>i mr' 'tw�ilo iix a Ana a 1¢m o v�.ae aw•, I.E Ix w¢ al, vxs rt rwa YS tlmMll¢ 61cws w K Q c v ■PIWIb ¢ s' IPaLr N ru¢, z• x � ImL. sn roai ra.l• a ¢ uarrt lnc. nsrulw - wY nl PwYI¢ YIP xlYml¢ CPNfr ■19xw. wi-uo-ai ■I-aN x wl-rtW E►415 6 IRLM YtYl. lt�Fl!!'1Mt' MP 'flw' {rAl�lwY M lPra Nm.ra ■ano, NYlu, rluw NM ll Y Il■[1ilSTCO [I!!1■®I RYNTI iIFTI !■xl F K N.. rR44 Ix IE¢ !. Ylip a di_____ Y1aa CY. ailw Lr. 1KM� Ymw SAII■■ . ■Ib h a'Y'Y. .. I['Yr____ ____ zur cT lw rar! PIMP IY WI¢A IM"�1�IY�YRIb w PRA,Fxm RANA' PTYO® EAS901T NOTE& Hir. f W ] IL-i. trY ,vrN�!•»rr p m lam • IYWYE tltmlr rw Mam la we malnm ETJ'V M 1f1�GUlJ p IYI�IDm� wIYIR el■r■Yr N fl¢Yla Nw® 10 ¢ K IIYL w. Iw11wY! PI■ Iw11Nw-ww © ibwPlatm a K Eltt ■'�dlPl!'■' OI M Illrl'IM-®a �li� COYNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORA770N AND WAYPoRVT PROPERTY GROUP EXISTING DSMO NOTES Iimwt ai r'cito'ri, u iaLapWl Na■¢rl IYw�IT� NIP PCIwxfIL O nlPllp.W. »h N �.xYyx �b cIR Rme. Ilr) iia IIe I.YMuww TIFi Ix�¢. erLlrNYll EPlfs PI.YM. I N.wIP�i IIE LMP Y 9PY IQi P:IIx V�FprNy m , Po.cna Ilaxn .0 IIINP ¢ Yr N IralE wY lKRMM rlwe9lslNfaP�l��lf ulil lom x�iralr �I I�o.'velLiiltl v In12%wy.xl ¢ 1plW1A O MI■YY ¢M�f�ull!¢ LNP 11�.61 KRIYY NP l�rRelC 01Y1¢YIYkIi�IFiIENP INCIePrIM Ill.rda, �® NI■Pr la, aRl Y PatWXi b. PHIwY ¢ ViIIIM EWPa. R Eltt [i rF1LRlr o Ml 6A■]aR�WlIlE6 �t'OPNA. I�IPFIYIYLP i��Llr o616YICcl. ¢: NWllgl eYl1■NIA 0J f■Plxl, I E..YNTIPI I_ 1¢ LMP Y ■vl PLANNING APPLICATION NQ PAII-W76 SHEET 1 IF 2 SHEETS �YI�I 07.2913 PRMCT NO. 1057001 OOM■YLTINE wl■.■/•,�w�� — TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP �.°w�L, 'Pw"' x�° ml,"'° Nww11 rra a nN.P PNLl — OY.T Pw.� Ew i' / f !/ _I _ _ �-- -- -' r-------------------•- -=-` -� - ---- � - --- ---- - -- ----------_- - 7 iI n`.4tt /At -- �i `� rsaa+ era - I�r rwWAS"-r�' .»..s rid rre.s �ti - - T -- -- y�h 4+ '` 1 J%ILZ 29 7i ai ac i7 ie is i7 e e ; P1EYa PE•ri.3 1 PE-n3 of-?3.s PE-M5 R•x1.7 1 IE•xt.7 PE-Iv.ir -' IE-19.Y K•te.l PE•te.l. / /� " . F ii,.•'�1. � I ,,�, 7a raa PE.n.6 i PE•n.6 7E-22.6 p. K-21.E Pi-22.0" fE'72.Q IS FE.W.x K•20.2 PE-12.4 R-W4 K,. t1V.{ 'a �k-•, � �j 1 / �� : /fir` - _ _ _ � .: •mod M 4 f J $• .,,w / \ '�. '+1'i a - dY �S iE'_ ` s PE-17.1 V aea+�eN+ w ae a0 I as it 9� I 41 a¢{Z 4e A '•°� �' '"., / / .`'"' / +' ' , 'AP C PE!27.5 ` PE-27.5 1 PE-xs.e '� PE.xS'a P[-x�.a PE .O .t[ n.s rc-22 rE•xos K•20,m PE3,2 31 as ae ae •eo as u .�. 3' ( ,�." {L Q `x� ,x PE•x1_a : PE-27.0 'PE-25.1 'J PS-20 PE-24.3 PEa = -a4.E. PE.$ 1r. y` \j _ snrotaP xQ,a PEra r e- I. Sy`�i • 1 f" / ,� T'1. ,;{ % I - i r r r ,fin• , F o k1i �"'i.�_. �' J �f?� re � r. a, a` C 1 �V l y ' I • ' - I t ll 'ply /r At ED 25 lk {J-/' 4 '.: '�'-, \�!s �'� -�\ .A�� {w .. -w'r�. J ooze m •smar— om, —I,p— h4 d,. \� ro . !. ,P,, ,, 1�d {, `.. • �w� 'Rf t ° ..a.I.a .. or vuor ,.e ss:E,cN] �r� •ycy'@ rrr �-* 1 � �i+ +P+ y {�j� sJ 1¢s,6,m rccm �u�ui 6 41 4�`,, . r•1 a• a, .4 . xlwwr sw i INMTMTM ak 5 Y — 3L N s IL zm r,� \, `� .� - r.%•• �• \ PLANNING APPLICATION 16L PAII-W76 naPr+"a rt.-, a M n ¢ F°•�r+:.rn j✓� "" i f SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS `E, `,.�1j'Q�.*�}!!� P i • )�#Wrd'�rm pt.3c.r5 PN0..ECT N0: l0E7001 E OOM 6ULTMm -tee. rr�7r. Elsa BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & W A Y P 0 1 N T PROPERTY GROUP I_ w1-4 r� M"12 Nwyrl ewA a .Iwo w.7w.uw PM]06M17 PIP.7lO.NN Fm N \� 1N �` I FrYM �'~ •. �' LM rr- .. tom• 25 \ ram• a•�es,�� JJ �JJ r. r / % • � �- m 1mrg L ulmPrA Meer m..w A m IM (I-11— Lem. �xN.A .umiina'o"`ie wxl�Qle"`m®'c P�.r'�ali.`im']1r a'No �.1ry one A�my�x Gn¢mn.. ra o..o.¢nwm to l..c, Av AIM. IN THE CITY OF TEIECILA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 36415 . WF ...ra.,'r——' NRIL 1012 / � W CA. WIRFIELD DRIVE ar M jfJ ! t Qg I E I f I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I •� I ES"» 1 Ei1 I I X { I I sr, 1 a.t $!I I l.:] I ,.. 1 .,., t I I I I I I I a., I F, W+ I +A:S I %1 I mi I 39 X 'i!? I 7j I 1 I :i1•s I ;:?i N7 q I I I I :I],;,,+•^; i"i`I i1i:i]rl I }_'._`_•__ `�____}__-.-"-�_-vim-}...: I.rz: l H.a•:•ri,h. ,]: I I I I I �__� •�_f�'�___}Y�___�r_-�}-r�--..}«.a.-.._}.��_�_}_�_-__}'•`r'. I I p _-W�-4-�1`���"�-�"I I I I I E I I I I •9� I t I I 25 24 r; 1 20 L1716 t 13 12 ! 9 8 5 4 ' !23 1 22 19 S 15 Z r14 11 10 7 g 3 26 I I 29 1 30 ill 33 I 34 11.1, 37 D STREET 'A' 41 1 42 1 1 j 45 1 46 28 I 31 �j 32 I 35 -36 i 4! t l 44 I 47 f I # 48 2 P Aa�E� \ _ ` 8 N,,9 • 9g6 PP �Wi'}°�s ''•ek NfYMv�WSOW-el 116 ¢�Qar Nn AT Mr,mrol a� 6 1NIFIaIAIE Iff P PAID, I] S' :�¢ ¢S1wIK o P• r¢eaAr Rn roa. a' x s rM ru¢n.A'a¢uart aL. nrvAnw • Pw nI BASIS OF BEARINGS NOTE a C I ar c_rLlFowS1TSA,c 6FI1a x m']Ix eSmYMul`�E, vaPnb I 11-1 rI" "6¢ ¢As 49`I]Nv1:.nn1P1xN n mm nPsxcrPr x�esr¢iaiPL it w �jlYrvclYelm'iI awn ro.worRl]I-6 ulo° • I ml9 uw r r ] mE S6Ecr Havnr 19 ¢SIOIAm w LYIK PImIN avE4 'AE' Aro arm III mrNlir PAr4 xPml remsc SM6 S, rt1m Auaer 24, ]1m, IN lIE LIiY ¢ ra]EDaA, WNrr ¢ R1A981¢ AE 'AE' EEIm O¢INm AS fllff rim F1EYAilR6 ¢1FWIMm' A �aRE '!' EIIC� CrYl2 n!m .�I MS ANA1ff ¢PII6 9R1NN I imr�PlMm MAi AKAS LEQ lllNl I SOWC SILL AM LFKaS RSP1 tP MrWL OWIE R®' MFY �j e. M,I., xS t.ae1PA� 11 a.a ANnL e11S. nP .aPla ]¢r een. � +b >h 4 A4[S, P Ilxf wr 1VdN[ NPr ,�w. �1��r � dw Itllprl�, + I rr�l VV••.V1iii 6lrOerw fel �a we NwmlWf[ a.U1rQ P a1aL RS*S 1-M] . Aam soYx ISCI Q ;aN�WtW 61R h9rE r^Ir1 • Sieo mwc rt[r PA 1.S2.pL1; H •NNiM 11iai al lx. Hall[ NILI„A.Ic.R.r Wi•E `r4i Q o. MxnlrrY,Nwl�mMas re.. �„ riLA Pa rarAom 1* A aaru Awc. " x vna(rs Pw+xm PPSP,7APSIr PISPI+Y. a ne IrIeA ]ww a .mAmA v La ar a 1..e1 ro Prerr .aL i +-Hamm,.. matte nrmc. �fJ ufe al fa la mmeNlu wwm. LLl]lllll Iwlu2S APIIS RIBrS m a 1¢Iwloa a Fl— Nw Mil. rrI g1a111H A.w is vrcNa 3. gllrlNl `lmsm/110AIIY mPn1L nNA IP6®Iml 6il¢ADO / ROE40 PIIK IDYL 6 FI¢JOO MrglB IL PlMllr rio YLTI FN1rtY ¢SIm A —1. ILL a Halm a Rxon uuvrlfi'mw_ _ MOVID iiT Swll¢ .lu ¢ wa'Im �LSmM U1111 ES .ILL s umoovo u DIS1RICi (PT] SECTIONm -Y-Y' r. a m]caaA Yrun 1iliilm Poo¢ rumen raPAml ¢ Lrr: xPm.r LS1SC1, I.rmm Lr1a•r IAaI I—— PVI-A]Wu, PPI-ArWm •r ' - I IYI¢nilASiYs I- N �II" @OMlme aa M I¢ 1P ¢ rK 12 now ennu'a m1¢ - m mlrml III— mlllr PIQ SAG A. j& LEGAL OESCRIPTIIM - I FOI P.!AxI I "/� aj1 —1F16 1SWlPri MO!R! rm¢m1NaEmrnrrICA BmSE1A1Ir.vr v LrtIr6ln 9MrEW PO 111a1".,: .'161M oI.-a n Itl rw Ar P. Arw �E8.1 I PREFERRED BANK Cllta CITYP. OF IYIA EMA r.... A WWS COYNK OSVEWPNRNI MPPORATION AND MAIYPDINT PR6}PRRTY RROUP Haan sNul, ulrc we ' A'� tWl a]o-YY P,u iMPM]].Nrw 1 TENTATIVE p TRACT NO. 36415 �LLA LIPDA EC+� _ PLANNING Met loth w. PAI1-02Ts SHEET 1 I SLEETS •••YI..11. mfaaum ca1e11ane ePrem c�weu�Tllan axanr. Pew `Aa ...l�smw. \ 'P5 V IN TW CITY OF TEIEC LA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 36415 - PDO EXHIBIT WF �r NR�L 10�2 \\\ ' \•_ --. C/L YUIRFIELD DRIVE Lm Ii N IP I ?.!I i r,7 I t,9 I I t. i I.°,2 L, I I I I ''I :; t- L�1 i 'il:i Pi{} I zTr};;;rl ;a :: l ;?:i?:"F,h•;. I I 1 I I I / A © liie vn w' � Ti I'mmaim a°cx�moR� vmia n ® � �= © T.M. lm1e®,®clnrs mfO1ma]A"or,°r."ila xmr ©Tli'rrm"a:lu.`Amri ,tl ],ee mu wwmw f/ O � ®rae ul lo. mmin. �.meop nennlr. uo rclmnti ` eti'I IN mlew, callv]I1. mi .. m°�i ,ila jligiw'®e m e a,u a ®In,IM tl A IPli11L In.+p x�e.lC UYI¢iflitlRl,lO'110 ire. xro'�m�m,'larr v� A. emm wsr u. ]m, e pie_ �In�ae� .am rel.aua xa Ix�la,xti 1O1 '""" unaxAmlrr�rl.'"e�x"Sa` �s"`i, s Iwia•a ar.r run.. ].Ir.r ww.. �o r.lu.w elv. I i 26 `7'lf 27 25 24.41 1 20 17 1 16 --'•, 1 23 E 22 1 19 ? r 18 1 15 29 1 30 111 33 1 34 1 l e 37 28 1 31 Jjj 32 1 35 M 36 1 39 13 12 ; ? 9 1 8 [ 14 11 ; 10 7 i D STREET 'A' 41 42 45 46 ate= I L j 40 43 L 44 47 5 4 I 1 48 49 / Q� V�'P Q PR I aAtleXw em 6i weltl Ier.A, v.A,Mrm.rxQMlw IOMrnXa FIQv, :1 IRF1 LR�IR FIrlA,lar • tli�nl BASIS Or 13EARINiS NOTE M In axM M d elfiA, At � 91 he till !e I� tAl Ww xllxl' A �el Vsl rf.11 r .rclrxlvr•e w• e n .aP u a onmwn ins] ma xvxco m �Lm�wna�n,I> pmwwr uan aorr ro. xrltllww van entlr ii Aaim er n+is rilun n ro M Imnc, v wo ] M sera wows Is tlslOaall . c dnre n,xlX xacs •u• xa wee. arAmrw a Ian Ran 119NII]£ Ba9ewv wP. m1YI11R PAIFL Metlll tltlec ]Itl 9, OAIm AIeaI tl, Intl, IX M nln 6 iCEnI.A, ml,iv 6 R11eMleF. NE 'tl' Ella eETlaEh a eAg Ron ¢[vA,laa tl,oelAm' Aro NE ']' ells tlillEn r •.�.. ar e n weaa aax¢ Rl 1. xrai I =a MI.»'a"°tlX xE.a °x.e��a-]'nm usae rlol n x11a+� aXl¢ Rose• ]. M a1G re a smlrl® le I9.n T -m sr.m ;OIaIE Rri am. r. mMei,o1pa i°xm i' p1i imi @ swc Rcrci. SIZIOMM •IA.L,ir,],nm�r I¢ e< a� Ix A SXmr d1.e,aro xltl,.11lff u wuuu IroluiE! .u® eI W,1 io I: Mtlxnlsm tl Fl ew rnrwAx er>ynlm Nrr 'eo°Fi° i ° �%9 a�vasca e�"aole.°"'iv nv�lnw'.a°io + -M la.:m ecA r rwlra®� ucn e�ane,la, e wa®'I[RX cxeln' ♦u t r4nemew�BlMy�.uV�11GR1 ii[[4YIIED -0IIM.IS, L enI aamw. aee,. �. ° <n4k+ al4 • E �U.� WHIP e a r]uoe.ivl. minw e.el .roXot rue(a rr-!rs r r •naau. rr.np�y le eUneA'1 nWm • ]yl x6x11nr e[rSIeYK We„ tr11T nr{+ LEGAL DESMIPTIO! Ps calrwliA. Ai scn er'ws+s a FFlr'IN' m i111W nova na PXaS1 WI/, Ix M allt9 V M L[arlT RtOml a lUe many. IaEMA eIM A IOl,lar 6 Lel ei a' IelCl ro. 9wdl tl Saar tl M v n"le nliveia -1 ao]vi • IxalhlK, a not Ix M a1Nila I:iSS PREFERRED BANK sle mlw Im d CIx�Y o I,m�ie,, G .lenl uo-la F. FAc letlle]s-nld CMNECUIA I. p xaX: (tlt IWti++r IAt (tllJ•rr-ean COY E DEVEWPNENT CORPORATION AND WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP M.�111i SAar, G dLrtl noC level >oPe1]x FAe (w])e1>-1w TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 36415 BELLA LIPDA FLAMING APPLICATION NO. PAI I-0276 SrUT 2 OF 2 SEUTS LOT 28 LOT 24 LOT 21 LOT 17 LOT B LOT B LOT 4 LOT 1 ! LOT 20 LOT 18 LOT 1.3 LOT 12 LOT 8 f!°I.YRATiON" r /! 0 11 BANN 00 ff f a LOT 23 LL.T..22. LOT 1B LOT 14 LOT 10 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 3 LOT 1B - — LOT 15 _ LOT 11 LOT 2 LOT 40 LOi 26 LOT 2B LOT 30 LOT JJ LOT 34 LOT J7 LOT 3B LOT 41 LOT 42 LOT 45 R311Rf KEYPAD �/ (D x LOT 0 .'.. *� /� `• , �, f ,�p}yyL'7 LOT 27 SKIN LOT 28 LOT 31 LOT 32 LOT 35 LOT 36 LOT 39 LOT 40 LOT 43 LOT 44 LOT *7 �f x 4V LOT 4R %0 !-E 11 a I. 1 I E 1 Y k 6 aV 1 - III l 4� liiAPWC SCN.E 6D . itan.ron � PARKING LP r ' d OT LIdi18 TYP. r ZN LAMM PLAY AREA W/ 90BWALE s TUBULAR a ea MACE € A It! . D O r..nCNCAREA W/ TAaEB SAY PREPAFEo FOR COYNE OEVELOABif CGIR WW WAVP'alf FWAPO N a101r LLC 1AWEffFMMa NENP0Nf MMK CA PNCf6 gnpom FAVJ am OONTACII I•!M 4rtlE JOB NMO 7-" M11..I1MMMA GROW I L LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Ca111mnia lice— 02017 RECREATIIIONN FACILITIES PLANNING M1wai, a eau lbn ar=1b5 iM iM-ew roe 111-1a a-u-u BELLA LINDA TEMECULA, CA. COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN j P9fPMILE ACC@R PAVE" f M. AlAf11UIClRITIONAi�If dON isa4 h ; tOaa Yr/I f'f� yl �hugL ¢yp MN / nMR a� it EAhUP r. 4 R� M41 O A Y llP14w �M1 1'R#I A -ME R.0 M Yi�k hevlY wl� �P ImR�rtf §Y +�eerw na wrnaa rt� -- .a •aaeww.iw.w I.wwE aswr .� Oa e�wc�1. �.w sr —_ w enaaf - w ew' we wnc aw M.`Ff4M Yard .Mlf m� �. AdY+ NR JRYIY. f of IW • NM Zia f Ot i4 � w nwu faw.0 4 ma+. laaoaa .ea.,� Oq - -) 1, A,!, J . 01 -- "I mmmmmmmmmm: Ali: .. ELECTRICAL FIXTURE SCHEDULE a]dlXTlw .aT Y71 .L � X�] •a ImL ul%I�IrIEOPE-I�io-a'nv� SmI W sIxNE talXac nxTUE Xarrlw) Im Tm IfE � 1� �-IaX'+�11-0� (1�¢E' ma XE�LI�emxiTTw w rlmA[) >¢ roe I OMIT IEIM � 1` LIM FIVE wlss-e�+Ic roan .;"'""'S irnw .ulilir'+Fiaa amlw IEiM • e• run®n n O w eco x mawo iTwT Si rwsr ALtiiirii ��aPlNJE]�90m ]0 1[TIL XLI¢ B1IAO EXCW lIM I�.�AY fl xrmlEle IXN[ F{]Ima u[c Palq E015..VIf.b! mop,I IXC]} +a-rm.-Mn V 1SmFlIk rry�A d rcas rACX w �+ 4!M ltwr nsu. .anllXr uaaX r 411 RJOOIW 0� IRmOW4 rR[ 'IpL 191x�s1'IKIw R r.a.- waa 6 U.-u*1 A.War�►IA Im m In Iac -1 u uwr Aiiol—)� 1•,•,. Iwrrlw nIM • u• PHOTOMETRICDATA L jl% oeslw AOE TO m Q XI VFw1a DOIXVII w. aaf 1. a) u0 cTn .eE 11 U%M (MIVAtE ]IIF£n. IlIMB�Np PNNiw lms)�� �i6 emu' IS ]m11Y 1s ffYl'IER➢M ]l n�. udiro0 0 rwffN4E ILLIYIwTId IX FMRYB XFII. MYEa, x0 wI'CAIHsa • YAx IIW I]' IOwllw IEIM A4 IIXEtRe d.T n Callon TIE TRAIL rAC1IL 4W�liIITIM IS Nm 'NxwIfXL Ei mLL�O LWIIE BELLA LINDA MOUNTING HEIGHT TABLE L jl% oeslw AOE TO m Q XI VFw1a DOIXVII w. aaf 1. a) u0 cTn .eE 11 U%M (MIVAtE ]IIF£n. IlIMB�Np PNNiw lms)�� �i6 emu' IS ]m11Y 1s ffYl'IER➢M ]l n�. udiro0 0 rwffN4E ILLIYIwTId IX FMRYB XFII. MYEa, x0 wI'CAIHsa • YAx IIW I]' IOwllw IEIM A4 IIXEtRe d.T n Callon TIE TRAIL rAC1IL 4W�liIITIM IS Nm 'NxwIfXL Ei mLL�O LWIIE BELLA LINDA MOUNTING HEIGHT TABLE EY.4pIX] 1V.[ iTaa NWITaLXwE W rNd M. tN[ . Xn[ s a.re a n' 'aa M wrn a' LIGHT PM'_,A ELEVATION LIGHT POLE W ELEVATION WALL MOUNTED LIGHT TTYP 1 PHOTOMETRIC DATA & DETAILS SKEET 1 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA COYNE DEVELOPMENT & WAYPOINT PROPERTY GROUP RAC' T t 1-'167 - -- - ---------------------- I -------------------- All `�' �Ilvo' wo [ALI IA IZI! NO.. \., rax a �* ♦ \ '� -- {{t` > r . i' f fir— _ r FLT , J 1j - P.repes.. Lv*an. 'sc�a e lm'pro em eats Alf \�� # ♦ / AAWI rth ' ' l •" "i -. £,� . pia`•. � � �, � r ..;�•_, ir, - io 4lJ _ s.. 1.1 €5I'M 911 N I I o,' )'lic �.�,� 7(1;-r,.'1. '� "yC• . tt I:r.rl; RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (PA11- 0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) (APNS 961-450-012, 961- 450-013, AND 961-450-003) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application No. PA11-0276, a Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed, including but not limited to, all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA") C. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. D. On April 12, 2012, in accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15082, the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) and circulated it to governmental agencies, organizations, and persons that may be interested in the Project, within 600 feet of the Specific Plan boundaries. The NOP requested that comments on the topics to be analyzed in the Draft EIR for the Project be submitted to the City by May 12, 2012. On April, 30, 2012 in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082(c)(1), the City held a public scoping meeting to obtain comments from interested parties on the scope of the Draft EIR. E. In response to the NOP, written comments were received from various individuals and organizations. These comment letters assisted the City in formulating the analysis in the Draft EIR. F. The City's EIR consultants thereafter prepared, in accordance with CEQA, a Draft EIR for the Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2012041038). G. Upon completion of the Draft EIR in December 2012, the City initiated a public comment period by filing a Notice of Completion with the State Office of Planning and Research on December 3, 2012. The City also published a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIR on January 20, 2013 in The Californian, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. H. The Draft EIR was circulated for public review from January 20, 2013 through and including March 6, 2013. Copies of the Draft EIR were sent to various public agencies, as well as to organizations and individuals requesting copies. In addition, the City placed copies of the Draft EIR at the City's library and made copies available for review at the City offices and on the City's website. I. In response to the Draft EIR, written comments were received from various agencies, individuals, and organizations. The City responded to all written comments. Those comments and the responses thereto are included as part of the Final Environmental Impact Report/Response to Comments document (Final EIR). The Final EIR consists of the DEIR, Comments and Responses to Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the Errata listing changes made to the Draft EIR in response to comments. J. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.5, not later than March 6, 2013, the City prepared and provided to all commenting public agencies its responses to all written comments. K. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. L. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. M. The Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting on April 17, 2013, considered the Project and environmental review at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Draft EIR. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the project based on issues related to the construction schedule of the age restricted housing and multi -family density. The applicant then chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. N. The Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting on October 2, 2013, considered the Project and environmental review at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Draft EIR. O. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13-39 recommending that the City Council certify the Final EIR prepared for the Bella Linda Residential Project, adopt Findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution Nos. 13-36, 13-37, and 13-38, thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay, Tentative Tract Map, and Development Plan related to the approval of the Project. P. Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before approving a project for which an EIR is required, make one or more of the following written finding(s) for each significant effect identified in the EIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR; or, 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or, 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. Q. Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that if a project will cause significant unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations state that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. R. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that are found to be less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section IV of Exhibit A to this Resolution. Exhibit A, Findings and Facts in Support of Findings, is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. S. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that are found to be less than significant through the imposition of mitigation are described in Section V of Exhibit A to this Resolution. T. Environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures are described in Section VI of Exhibit A to this Resolution. U. Alternatives to the Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section VII of Exhibit A of this Resolution. V. A discussion of the project benefits identified by City staff and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the environmental impacts that cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level are set forth in Exhibit B to this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. W. Public Resources Code section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit C, and is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. X. On November 26, 2013, the City Council considered the Final EIR for the Project at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. Y. Prior to taking action the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information requiring additional environmental review or re -circulation of the EIR under CEQA because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified. Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby: A. Declare that the City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final Environmental Impact Report, the written and oral comments on the Draft EIR, staff reports and responses to comments incorporated into the Final EIR, and all testimony related to environmental issues. B. Determine that the Final EIR fully analyzes and discloses the potential impacts of the Project, and that those impacts have been mitigated or avoided to the extent feasible for the reasons set forth in the Findings attached hereto as Exhibit A, with the exception of those impacts found to be significant and unmitigable as discussed therein. C. Certify that the Final EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA. D. Declare that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City Council further finds that the additional information provided in the staff reports, in comments on the EIR, the responses to comments on the EIR, and the evidence presented in written and oral testimony does not constitute new information requiring recirculation of the EIR under CEQA. Section 3. Certification of the Final EIR. The City Council hereby certifies the Final EIR, adopts the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full. The City Council further determines that all of the findings made in this Resolution (including Exhibit A) are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Final EIR and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and in the record of the proceedings. The City Council further finds that each of the overriding benefits stated in Exhibit B, by itself, would justify proceeding with the Project despite any significant unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR or alleged to be significant in the record of proceedings. Section 4. Conditions of Approval. The City Council hereby imposes as a condition on the Development Plan (PA11-0275) each mitigation measure specified in Exhibit C, and directs City staff to implement and to monitor the mitigation measures as described in Exhibit C. Section 5. Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is the custodian of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. Section 6. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of November, 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of November, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk FINDINGS AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS Introduction. The California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000, et seq. (the "Guidelines") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified that identifies one or more significant effects on the environment caused by the project unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR. B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Bella Linda Residential Development (the "Project"), as more fully described in the Final EIR. These findings are based upon written and oral evidence included in the record of these proceedings, comments on the Draft EIR and the written responses thereto, and reports presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council by City staff and the City's environmental consultants. II. Project Objectives. As set forth in the EIR, objectives that the City of Temecula seeks to achieve with this Project (the "Project Objectives") are as follows: A. Create a high -quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market; B. Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surround residential communities; C. Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population; D. Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and increased demand for housing. Effects Determined to be Less Than Sianificant/No Imaact in the Initial Stud The City of Temecula conducted an Initial Study in February 2012, to determine significant effects of the Project. In the course of this evaluation certain impacts were found to be less than significant due to the inability of a project of this scope to create such impacts or the absence of project characteristics producing effects of this type. The following issue areas were determined not to be significant for the reasons set forth in the Initial Study and were not analyzed in the EIR: (A) Aesthetics; (B) Agricultural and Forest Resources; (C) Mineral Resources; and (D) Recreation. Impacts related to the following issue areas were found to be potentially significant and were studied in the EIR: (A) Air Quality; (B) Biological Resources; (C) Green House Gas Emissions (D) Cultural Resources; (E) Geology and Soils; (F) Hazards and Hazardous Materials; (G) Hydrology and Water Quality; (H) Land Use and Planning; (1) Noise; (J) Population and Housing; (K) Public Services; (L) Transportation and Traffic; (M) Utilities and Service Systems. A. On April 12, 2012, in accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15082, the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) and circulated it to governmental agencies, organizations, and persons that may be interested in the Project. The NOP requested comments within 30 days of the notice. On April 30, 2012, in accordance with CEQA Section 15082(c)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City held a public scoping meeting to obtain comments from interested parties on the scope of the Draft EIR. No comments were received on areas other than those found to be potentially significant in the Initial Study. IV. Effects Determined to be Less Than Significant Without Mitigation in the EIR The Draft EIR completed on December 3, 2012 found that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact without the imposition of mitigation on a number of environmental topic areas. The less than significant environmental impact determination was made for each of the following topic areas listed below, based on the more expansive discussions contained in the EIR. A. Air Quality 1. The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. 2. The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). 3. The Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. 4. The Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. A. Biological Resources 1. The Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2. The Project would not have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. 3. The Project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. 4. The Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. 5. The Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. B. Geology and Soils 1. The Project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. b. Strong seismic ground shaking. C. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction. d. Landslides. 2. The Project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. 3. The Project is not located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. 4. The Project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. 3 5. The Project does not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. C. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1. The Project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. 2. The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1. The Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. 2. The Project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. 3. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. 4. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. E. Hydrology and Water Quality 1. The Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. 2. The Project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). 3. The Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. 4. The Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site. 5. The Project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. 6. The Project would not require the preparation of a project -specific WQMP. 7. The Project would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. 8. The Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. 9. The Project would not cause inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. F. Land Use and Planning 1. Project implementation would not physically divide an established community. 2. Project implementation would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. 3. The Project would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. G. Noise 1. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. H. Population and Housing 1. The Project would not induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure). 2. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 3. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 5 Public Services 1. The Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities. J. Transportation/Traffic 1. Implementation of the Project would not conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. 2. Project implementation would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. 3. Project implementation would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). 4. Project implementation would not result in inadequate emergency access. 5. Project implementation would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. K. Utilities and Service Systems 1. The Project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2. The Project would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. 3. The Project would not require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. 4. The Project would not result in insufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed. 0 5. The Project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. 6. The Project would not result in insufficient permitted capacity by a landfill to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. 7. The Project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. V. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts Determined to be Mitigated to a Less Than Significant Level The Draft EIR identified the potential for the Project to cause significant environmental impacts in the areas of air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise and traffic and circulation. With the exception of specific impacts to noise discussed in Section VI, measures have been identified that would mitigate all of the impacts in this section to a less than significant level. The City Council finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project identified in the Final EIR would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than significant level, with the exception of those unmitigable impacts discussed in Section VI. The City Council adopts all of the feasible mitigation measures for the Project described in the Final EIR as conditions of approval of the Project and incorporates those into the Project, as discussed more fully in Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. A. Air Quality 1. The Project could violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Impact Air-1: The Project's construction emissions would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) daily NOx significance threshold during the grading and excavation phase and air quality impacts associated with NOx would be significant. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant environmental effects to air quality. Specifically, the following measures have been included to ensure that the Project's potential air quality impacts remain less than significant. Measure Air-1: All construction equipment used onsite during project construction shall meet, at a minimum, EPA Tier II certification requirements. As an alternative, the applicant may opt to apply other available technologies to the construction equipment that would achieve at least a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions than the use of Tier 11 construction equipment. Where alternatives to EPA Tier 11 are chosen for the proposed project, the applicant shall be required to show evidence to the City that a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions would be achieved. Facts in Support of Findings Implementation of Mitigation Measure Air-1 would reduce the NOx emissions generated during the Project's grading and excavation phase to below the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) daily significance threshold by requiring all construction equipment used at the project site to meet, at a minimum, EPA Tier II certification requirements. Equipment that meets Tier II emission standards is certified as such by the USEPA by the manufacturer. Table 3.1-6 of the Draft EIR provides the reductions in emission that would be achieved with the use of this construction equipment. With the minimum standard of Tier II construction equipment, the predicted total NOx daily maximum emissions would be 94.30 Ibs per day, which would be below the regional SCQAMD significance threshold of 100 Ibs per day. Thus, with implementation of Mitigation Measure Air-1, the NOx emissions generated by the project during the grading and excavation phase would be reduced to below SCAQMD's daily significance threshold. Therefore, this impact would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. B. Biological Resources 1. The Project has the potential to impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This includes Burrowing Owls. Impact Bio-1: Impacts to raptors and other migratory birds include direct loss of potential foraging and nesting habitat. Potential nesting habitat onsite includes mature trees and shrubs as well as grassland (in the case of ground -nesting birds such as Northern Harrier and Mourning Dove. It is possible that raptors and other migratory birds would nest onsite due to the proximity to open space and preserved lands such as Temecula Creek and the Pechanga Reservation lands. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to biological resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measures will ensure that no significant impacts occur to biological resources. Mitigation Measure Bio-1: Impacts to raptors and other migratory birds shall be avoided by the implementation of one of the following measures: All construction and ground disturbing activities shall take place outside of the raptor breeding season (February 1 - August 30). If construction and ground disturbing activities are necessary during the breeding season (February 1- August 30), a focused survey for active nests of raptors and migratory birds shall be conducted by a biologist (a person possessing a bachelors in science with a minimum of one year nest survey experience performing raptor surveys). The survey shall occur a maximum of 14 days prior to any construction or ground -disturbing activities. If active nest(s) (with eggs or fledglings) are identified within the project site, (California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for state listed species, species of special concern, and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) covered species; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for birds covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and listed species) they shall not be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged (matured to a state that they can leave the nest on their own). A 500-foot construction setback from any active nesting location shall be adhered to in order to avoid disturbance of the nest until the young have fledged or the nest has failed, as determined by a qualified biologist. If no active nests are identified, construction may commence. Impact Bio-2: Burrowing Owls could inhabit the site prior to project construction as appropriate Burrowing Owl foraging and nesting habitat is present. Potential impacts to this species would include loss of foraging and nesting (i.e., burrowing) habitat. Burrowing Owls present during grading and other construction related activities have the potential to be killed or displaced through burrow collapse and other impacts. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to biological resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measures will ensure that no significant impacts occur to biological resources. Mitigation Measure Bio-2: he entire project site shall be surveyed by a qualified biologist (i.e., approved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]) using CDFW approved Burrowing Owl survey protocols a maximum of 30 days prior to construction to determine presence/absence of Burrowing Owl (CDFW, 2012). If no Burrowing Owls are identified on the site during these pre -construction surveys, no additional mitigation is necessary and construction can commence. If Burrowing Owl(s) are found onsite, CDFW, the City, and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) will be notified. The following species -specific mitigation actions would be required if Burrowing Owls are found: Sheltering in place of nesting owls until nest fledges or fails, as determined by a qualified biologist (a Bachelor's of Science degree or equivalent experience and a minimum of one year of previous burrowing owl monitoring experience). Preparing and implementing an active translocation plan, if appropriate and approved, and identifying a receptor site for the owl(s) (per the Western Riverside County MSHCP and CDFW). Facts in Support of Findings If occupied by raptors, migratory birds, and/or Burrowing Owls at the time of construction, development of the Project site could result in impacts to these species. Given the timing of construction is unknown and occupation of the Project site by these species could change over time, pre -construction measures must be implemented to ensure that impacts would not occur. The mitigation measures proposed will ensure that no activity will take place that will endanger these sensitive species by requiring that construction and ground disturbing activities do not take place during breeding seasons (February 1 — August 30) unless preconstruction nest/burrow surveys have been conducted. If sensitive species are found, they are to be avoided with a 500-foot setback. A 500-foot setback is widely accepted as a reasonable guideline by the wildlife agencies for migratory bird species and most raptors (the generally accepted set -back for migratory bird nests is 200-300 feet, for raptors 500 feet). The Burrowing Owl mitigation follows the CDFW March 17, 2012 staff report specifying the requirements for protection of this species. In addition, this setback must be adhered to until a qualified biologist has determined the animals will no longer be negatively impacted by construction or ground disturbing activities. These mitigation measures will reduce project impacts to a less than significant level. C. Cultural Resources Impacts to Historic and Archaeological Resources Impact Cultural-1: The results of the Extended Phase I investigation, which included archival research, geoarchaeological review, Native American contact, field survey, and Extended Phase I testing, suggest the project area is sensitive for cultural resources. In addition, representatives of the Pechanga Tribe indicate the project area is sensitive for cultural resources, and that the project area is within the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape Area, one of the most sacred areas for the Pechanga Tribe. Although the lack of identified subsurface archaeological materials greatly reduces the likelihood of encountering buried archaeological resources as a result of project implementation, it does not preclude this possibility entirely. The Pechanga Tribe was consulted in preparation of this EIR section. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to known cultural resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measure will ensure a less than significant impact. 10 Mitigation Measure Cultural-1: Retention of a Qualified Archaeologist: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (Department of the Interior, 2012) to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures Cultural-2, -3 and -5). Mitigation Measure Cultural-2: Cultural Resources Training: The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Mitigation Measure Cultural-3: Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. Mitigation Measure Cultural-4: Native American Monitoring: At least 30 days prior to beginning Project construction, the applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City and the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; Project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. A minimum of 30 days prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, a Native American monitor from the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the applicant to monitor all ground -disturbing activities including, but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, as specified in the Plan and Agreement. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Native American monitors may be required. Mitigation Measure Cultural-5: Unanticipated Archaeological Resources Discoveries: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and 11 shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Mitigation Measure Cultural-6: Curation: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of Project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure Cultural-4). Mitigation Measure Cultural-7: Discovery of Sacred Sites: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the Project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. Facts in Support of Findings The retention of a qualified archeologist and cultural resources worker sensitivity training will ensure all involved in the construction of the Project are aware of the potential to inadvertently discover sensitive historic and architectural resources. The required monitoring by a qualified archeologist and Pechanga Tribe representative will ensure that any archeological and historic resources are identified and that further work will not disturb these artifacts until they are properly identified and removed from the site. Furthermore, the mitigation requires that culturally sensitive items be released to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment. In addition, if an area is discovered that is determined to be sacred, this area shall be avoided. These measures will reduce Project impacts to a less than significant level. 2. Impacts to Paleontological Resources Impact Cultural-2: If site preparation activities require grading ten or more feet below the ground surface, there could be the potential to disturb and impact significant paleontological resources. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant impact on any potential discovery of paleontological resources. Specifically, Mitigation Measures Cultural-8 through 10 will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure Cultural-8: Paleontological Resources Training: Prior to construction, a training session on the recognition of the types of paleontological resources that could be encountered within the project area and the procedures to be followed 12 if they are found shall be presented to project construction personnel by a qualified cultural resources professional. This training may be conducted concurrently with the cultural resources training required in Mitigation Measure Cultural-2. Mitigation Measure Cultural-9: Paleontological Resources Monitoring: During construction, should excavations be greater than ten feet in depth, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained and shall designate a paleontological monitor to observe the sediments. Should these sediments appear to have a greater potential for fossils, paleontological monitoring of ground disturbing activities below ten feet shall commence until such a time as the excavation of these sediments has ceased, or upon determination by the qualified paleontologist that the likelihood of encountering paleontological resources is unlikely. Mitigation Measure Cultural-10: Unanticipated Paleontological Resources Discoveries: If construction or other Project personnel discover any potential fossils during construction, or Project operations and maintenance, regardless of the depth of work, work within 100 feet of the discovery location should cease and a qualified paleontologist should be called to further assess the discovery and make further recommendations as necessary. Facts in Support of Findings Temecula's General Plan (implementation measure OS-26) requires that a paleontologist be retained to observe grading activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. However, significant paleontological resources can be uncovered even in areas of low sensitivity, and it is possible that ground -disturbing construction activities associated with the construction of the project could result in the inadvertent discovery of paleontological resources, which could be a significant impact. Therefore, Mitigation Measures Cultural 8 through 10 will be implemented to ensure any potential impacts to paleontological resources are minimized to be less than significant. 3. Disturbance of Human Remains Impact Cultural-3: Because the proposed Project would involve ground - disturbing activities, it is possible that such actions could unearth, expose, or disturb previously unknown human remains interred outside of a formal cemetery. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential for the disturbance of human remains. Specifically, Mitigation Measure Cultural-11 will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure Cultural-11: Human Remains Discoveries: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner 13 determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and the Agreement described in Mitigation Measure Cultural-4. Facts in Support of Findings It is unlikely that human remains would be encountered as a result of the proposed project. However, in the unlikely event that human remains are discovered, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, the human remains could be inadvertently damaged, which could be a significant impact. Because Mitigation Measure Cultural-11 would require the immediate halting of the construction activity and that no further disturbance would occur to the burials, this mitigation measure would avoid significant impacts to the burials. The Riverside County Coroner would be required to make the necessary findings as to origin and proper treatment and disposition would be arranged and implemented. This measure also provides for the appropriate notification and coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission and the "most likely descendant(s)" in order to address any specific tribal treatments or protocols for the treatment of the remains. For these reasons, Mitigation Measure Cultural-11 would avoid significant impacts to human remains that may be inadvertently discovered during project construction. D. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1. Impacts to the public or environment through transport, use, disposal or accidental release of hazardous materials. Impact Haz-1: Hazardous materials used onsite during construction activities (i.e., petroleum products, solvents, paints, etc.) could be released to the environment through improper handling or storage, resulting in a potentially significant impact. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduces the impacts to less than significant. Specifically, Mitigation Measure Haz- 1 shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure Haz-1: The use of construction best management practices shall be implemented as part of construction to minimize the potential negative effects of accidental release of hazardous materials to groundwater and soils. These shall include the following: Follow manufacturer's recommendations on use, storage and disposal of chemical products used in construction; Avoid overtopping construction equipment fuel gas tanks; 14 iii. During routine maintenance of construction equipment, properly contain and remove grease and oils; iv. Properly dispose of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and local and state regulations. Facts in Support of Findings Construction activities would require the use of certain hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, solvents, and glues. Inadvertent release of large quantities of these materials into the environment could adversely impact soil, surface waters, or groundwater quality. However, the onsite storage and/or use of large quantities of materials capable of impacting soil and groundwater are not typically required for a project of this proposed size and type. Given that the exact nature and quantities of hazardous materials to be used during the construction process are not detailed at this time, it is possible that the construction project would result in a significant impact related to hazardous materials through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials if the construction project was not managed with care and adherence to proper controls at the construction site. This mitigation measure is designed to ensure that construction activities occur in a manner that follows standard best practices and reduces the potential, or likelihood, or significant impacts related to the use of these materials. Mitigation Measure Haz-1 requires the implementation of these measures including: following manufacturer's recommendations on use, storage and disposal of chemical products; properly containing and removing grease and oils; and disposing of fuels and other chemicals in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and local and state regulations. Following Mitigation Measure Haz-1 will ensure that potential impacts related to hazardous materials are controlled to a less than significant level. E. Noise 1. Temporary construction activities could result in exposure of persons to excessive levels of ground -borne vibration levels. Impact Noise-2: Construction of the proposed project may expose residences to the west of the project site to vibration levels that would exceed the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) 80 VdB threshold for residences or places where people may sleep. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that would lessen the significant ground -borne vibration impacts associated with construction activities. Specifically, measures have been included to reduce noise impacts from construction activities associated with the project that would result in exposure of sensitive receptors to excessive levels of ground -borne vibration within the Project area to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure Noise-7. 15 Mitigation Measure Noise-7: The operation of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration, such as large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills, shall be prohibited within 45 feet of existing nearby residential structures during construction of the proposed project. Instead, small rubber -tired bulldozers shall be used within this area during grading and excavation operations. The use of small rubber -tired bulldozers would result in vibration levels of 0.002 PPV and 57 VdB at the residences to the west of the Project site, which would not exceed the FTA's vibration criteria for building damage and human annoyance. Facts in Support of Findings Implementation of Mitigation Measure Noise-7, which would prohibit the use of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration (i.e., large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills) within specified distances from existing offsite residential uses that are located nearby the proposed Project, would ensure that the construction -related vibration impacts associated with human annoyance at these nearby receptors would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. Controlling the type of equipment to be used in the vicinity of the residences to preclude the use of high vibration equipment (large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills) would result in a corresponding decrease in the anticipated vibration levels at the residences located to the west of the project site. As show in Table 3.9-10 of the EIR, large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills would result in vibration levels more than 20 VdB above the use of small bulldozers (with rubber tires). Thus, with these limitations, it is anticipated that vibration levels at nearby sensitive receptors would not exceed 65 VdB. For these reasons, limiting these types of high vibration equipment would more than provide for the decrease in vibration necessary to reduce the impact below 80 VdB, which is the threshold of significance. With implementation of mitigation measures and the avoidance of use of construction equipment that generate high levels of vibration, the vibration impact at offsite residential uses located immediately west of the Project site would be less than significant. 2. Permanent increase in ambient noise levels. Impact Noise-3: Operation of the proposed Project could expose nearby sensitive resources to noise levels exceeding 5 dB due to operation of heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment at the Project site. a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the noise level impacts so that operational noise levels do not exceed applicable noise standards and the impact would therefore be less than significant. Mitigation Measure Noise-8: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that all new HVAC or mechanical equipment associated with the proposed Project be designed with adequate shielding (e.g., via rooftop parapet or enclosure) or noise muffling devices to ensure that noise levels would not exceed the ambient noise level on the premises of other occupied residential properties located offsite by more than five decibels. 16 Mitigation Measure Noise-9: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that all exterior windows associated with the proposed residential uses at the project site shall be constructed to provide a sufficient amount of sound insulation to ensure that interior noise levels would be below an Ldn or CNEL of 45 dB in any habitable room. Facts in Support of Findings As part of the proposed Project, new mechanical equipment and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units and exhaust fans may be installed on the proposed residential units. The noise levels generated by the new HVAC units and exhaust fans for the proposed Project could potentially disturb the existing surrounding residential uses to the Project site. In particular, the residential uses located immediately west of the Project site, across the concrete -lined flood channel, would be exposed to the highest noise levels due to their proximity to the Project site. However, as an industry practice, the design of the onsite HVAC units and other noise -generating mechanical equipment associated with the new residential units at the Project site would typically be installed on the rooftops of the residential structures and would be equipped with noise muffling devices or shielding to reduce noise levels that may affect nearby noise - sensitive uses. Additionally, according to Section 9.20.030 (Exemptions) of the Temecula Municipal Code, sound emanating from heating and air conditioning equipment are exempt from the City's noise standards. Nonetheless, to ensure that the nearby noise -sensitive uses to the project site would not be adversely affected by any HVAC equipment noise, Mitigation Measure Noise-8 would be implemented, which prohibits noise from HVAC equipment from exceeding the ambient noise level on the premises of other occupied properties by more than 5 dB. Furthermore, in order to ensure that onsite operational noise would not adversely affect the future residents at the project site, Mitigation Measure Noise-9 would be implemented to ensure that all exterior windows associated with the proposed residential uses would be constructed such that sufficient sound insulation is provided to ensure that interior noise levels would be below a Ldn (average A -weighted noise level during a 24-hour day) or CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) of 45 dB in any residential unit. Mitigation Measures Noise 8 and 9 will ensure long term noises generated by the project will be reduced to less than significant levels. F. Transportation/Traffic Conflict with the Circulation System Impact Circ-1: The proposed Project would result in significant impacts at the following intersections under the Project Phase 1 Opening Year (2015) Conditions: 1-15 SB Ramps at Temecula Parkway — AM and PM Peak Hour 2. Wolf Valley Road at Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Hour 17 a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce impacts to intersections therefore impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measure Circ-1: The City shall provide for timing optimization at the following locations, funded by the Project proponent/developer: 1. Intersection of 1-15 SIB Ramps and Temecula Parkway — AM and PM Peak Hour: Signal timing optimization will occur to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed synchronization reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the Traffic Study. a. Improved AM operations to Level of Service (LOS) D, delay of 42.1 seconds. Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 52 seconds. b. Fair share contribution for this mitigation measure is 15%. 2. Intersection of Wolf Valley Road at Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Hour: Signal timing optimization: Cycle lengths were changed from 90 seconds to 150 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed synchronization reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the Traffic Study. a. Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 40.6 seconds. b. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 12%. Facts in Support of Findings After mitigation, both intersections would operate at LOS D. Delay at the intersection of 1-15 SB Ramps and Temecula Parkway would be improved to 42.1 seconds for the AM peak hour and 52.8 seconds for the PM peak hour. Delay at the intersection of Wolf Valley Road and Pechanga Parkway would be improved to 40.6 seconds in the PM peak hour. Mitigation Measure Circ-1 would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Impact Circ-2: Under Future Buildout (2035) Plus Project conditions, intersections at the following locations would operate at or below LOS D, resulting in potentially significant impacts: 1. 1-15 NB Ramps at Temecula Parkway — AM Peak Hour 2. Rainbow Canyon Road at Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Hour a. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the impacts from cumulative traffic impacts to less than significant. IN Mitigation Measure Circ-2: The following improvements shall be made by the City of Temecula, and funded by the project proponent/developer: 1. At the intersection of 1-15 NB Ramps and Temecula Parkway, restripe westbound third through lane to shared through -right turn lane. Signal optimization will occur to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed synchronization reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the Traffic Study. a. Improved AM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.4 seconds. b. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 4%. C. This intersection is within Caltrans jurisdiction and therefore any proposed mitigation measures require Caltrans approval. 2. At the intersection of Pechanga Parkway at Rainbow Canyon Road, change eastbound right turn permissive phase to overlap. Signal optimization will occur by changing cycle lengths from 90 seconds to 110 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to heavier volumes. Detailed synchronization reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the Traffic Study. a. Improved PM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.9 seconds. b. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 9%. Facts in Support of Findings All though local roadway segments are projected to operate unacceptably under Future Buildout (2035) Conditions, the plus project conditions reduce the average daily trips (ADT) on each roadway and, therefore, do not impact the facilities. The proposed Project would not contribute to the projected congestion levels, and thus, does not have a significant impact on these roadway segments as highlighted in the below table. Wo TABLE 1 ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE — FUTURE BUILDOUT (2035) PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS ROADWAY FROM TO BASE ADT PLUS PROJECT ADT PROJECT TRAFFIC % INCREASE MARGARITA DARTOLO TEMECULA 42,260 42,006 -254 -0.60% RD RD PKWY TEMECULA 1-15 FWY NB BEDFORD 76,910 75,893 -1,017 -1.32% PKWY RAMPS CT PECHANGA RAINBOW MURFIELD 56,400 54,166 -2,234 -3.96% PKWY CANYON DR RD PECHANGA HURON ST WOLF 42,770 42,346 -424 -0.99% PKWY VALLEY RD PECHANGA WOLF CASINO 39,510 39,228 -282 -0.71% PKWY VALLEY RD DRIVE Facts in Support of Findings Although local roadway segments are projected to operate unacceptably under Future Buildout (2035) Conditions, the plus project conditions reduce the average daily trips (ADT) on each roadway and, therefore, do not impact the facilities. VI. Environmental Effects that Remain Significant and Unavoidable After Mitigation In the environmental areas of noise there are instances where potential environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as discussed below. A. Noise 1. Temporary construction related noise generation Impact Noise-1: Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would generate a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity and would expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial increases in noise levels. These noise levels would result in substantial temporary or periodic ambient noise levels at the following surrounding sensitive land uses: residences southeast of the Project site across Loma Linda Road, residences west of the Project site across the concrete -lined flood channel, residences northeast of the Project site across Temecula Lane, and at the Pala Community Park. a. Findings 20 Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that reduce the impacts related to noise. The below mitigation measures are required in order to reduce noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors to the extent practicable. Mitigation Measure Noise-1: The Project proponent/developer shall ensure that all construction equipment will have properly operating mufflers. Mitigation Measure Noise-2: Noise and ground -borne vibration construction activities whose specific location on the Project site may be flexible (e.g., operation of compressors and generators, cement mixing, general truck idling) shall be conducted as far as possible from the nearest noise- and vibration -sensitive land uses. Mitigation Measure Noise-3: Construction activities associated with the proposed Project shall, to the extent feasible, be scheduled so as to avoid operating several pieces of equipment simultaneously, which causes high noise levels. Mitigation Measure Noise-4: Barriers such as plywood structures or flexible sound control curtains shall be erected around the Project site to minimize the amount of noise on the surrounding offsite sensitive receptors to the maximum extent feasible during construction. Mitigation Measure Noise-5: The Project proponent/developer shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a contact number for the job site. Mitigation Measure Noise-6: Construction activities shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM Monday through Saturday. Further, no construction activity shall be undertaken on Sundays and nationally recognized holidays (Section 9.20.060 of the City's Municipal Code). Facts in Support of Findings Although the above mitigation measures would reduce the project's construction noise levels to the maximum extent feasible, it is anticipated that the nearest offsite sensitive receptors would continue to experience a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels during project construction. Therefore, the Project's construction noise would be a temporary significant and unavoidable impact on the nearby offsite sensitive receptors. VII. Project Alternatives A. Alternatives Not Evaluated in the EIR An alternative site or location for the project need not be considered when its implementation is "remote and speculative" such as the site being out of the purview of the lead agency or beyond the control of a project applicant. Alternative sites were not selected for evaluation. The CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(2) specifies that the key question with alternative sites is "whether any of the significant effects of the Project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the Project at another location." While other similar -sized 21 areas of land could be found, based on the known general conditions in the area and the magnitude of the proposal, an alternative site in the area would have the same or similar significant impacts after mitigation as the Project. Given the desire for infill development that matches the surrounding residential communities in density and character, finding another site that meets this goal is impractical. In addition, it would be difficult to still proceed within a reasonably similar time frame for Project completion. The EIR analyzed four other Project alternatives. These three alternatives were considered but ultimately found not to meet the Project's objectives as for the various reasons stated below. A summary of the Project objectives and their relationship to the Project Alternatives can be found in Table 2 at end of the section. B. Alternatives Considered in the EIR Alternative One — No Project Alternative (No Development) a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the Project site would be left undeveloped and the proposed residential project would not be built. The site would continue to contain the remnants of a previous structure and several trees as well as ruderal vegetation. In addition, the concrete culvert along the western edge of the project site would remain as is and would not be converted into a bioswale. Unimproved areas along Pechanga Parkway would not be landscaped nor improved in any other way. objectives are: b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Alternative 1 does not meet any of the four Project objectives. These • Create a high -quality residential community on the Project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes The No Project Alternative does not meet any of the Project objectives (per Table 2) because it will lessen residential options for the City's growing population. According to the California Department of Finance, Temecula had a population of 103,092 as of January 1, 2012. During the period from 2007 to 2012, the California Department of Finance estimates that the City population grew by nearly 11 %. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) estimates that Temecula will have a projected growth rate of 13.2% to 22 about 113,303 persons by 2021. The Project will create new residential opportunities for these new residents. These opportunities will not exist without the Project. For this reason, the City Council rejects this alternative. 2. Alternative Two — Existing Zoning with Senior Care Facility a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the Project site would be developed with a senior care facility that would include the following components, all of which are permitted uses under the existing professional office (PO) zoning classification (see Section17.08.030 of the Municipal Code): 121-unit assisted care building; ii. 141-unit senior apartment building; iii. Two medical office buildings totaling 27,700 square feet; iv. 7,200-square-foot Alzheimer's facility; and V. 69 independent care housing units with a detached clubhouse and pool This alternative would also include landscaping and the required parking. Total development would involve 380,859 square feet of building area. Additional onsite amenities would include walking paths with benches, garden areas, outdoor activity areas (such as croquet or lawn bowling), large, park -like landscaped areas, water features, and health and personal hygiene services such as barber shops and beauty salons. The site would also be served by bus and shuttle services. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Alternative Two would achieve some of the proposed Project objectives by providing facilities to the City's senior population. Density will remain consistent with current zoning since a Zone Change will not be pursued with this alternative. Project objectives are: • Create a high -quality residential community on the Project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a Project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes 23 Populations other than 55 and older would not have an opportunity to benefit from the project if Alternative Two is pursued. According to the General Plan the City's median age is 28.8. In addition, the General Plan states that the largest age range in the City is between the ages of 25-44 years old (Figure H-2, City of Temecula General Plan). This age range is expected to rise and will need quality housing options. Therefore, Alternative Two would not fully achieve all of the project objectives (per Table 2). The City Council rejects this alternative as infeasible for this reason. 3. Alternative Three — Existing Zoning with Multi -Family housing a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the Project site would be developed with approximately 295 multi -family residential units with 192 triplex units in 64 buildings, 25 five- plex units in five buildings, and 78 six-plex units in 13 buildings. Ten percent of these units (approximately 30 units) would be reserved for lower -income housing. In addition, this alternative would include a linear park system that would run north -south through the middle of the project with several east -west spurs. Water quality basins would be included along the northern edge of the property to accommodate increased stormwater runoff from the project site. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Alternative Three would achieve some of the proposed project objectives. Density will remain consistent with current zoning since a Zone Change will not be pursued with this alternative. The same high quality units will be required for the project. Finally, the housing will remain as a for rent product. Project objectives are: • Create a high -quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes According to the California Department of Finance, Temecula had a population of 103,092 as of January 1, 2012. The U.S. Census Bureau has indicated in their 2010 Census 23.7 percent of Temecula residents are 50 and older. Alternative Three will not allow opportunities for residents that can qualify age restricted housing. Therefore, Alternative Three would not fully achieve all of the project objectives (per Table 2). The City Council rejects this alternative as infeasible for this reason. 4. Alternative Four — Reduced Project Alternative 24 a. Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, a residential project would be developed that would include similar components as the proposed project, but would involve a smaller version. Specifically, the Project would include development of approximately 200 multi -family units (a reduction 125 units when compared to the Project) with approximately 10 percent of these units reserved for affordable housing. This alternative would not include lots for senior single-family homes, but would provide site amenities such as a clubhouse with a swimming pool. Unimproved areas along Pechanga Parkway would remain unimproved with no landscaping. b. Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Alternative Four would achieve some of the proposed project objectives. Density will remain consistent with current zoning since a Zone Change will not be pursued with this alternative. The same high quality units will be required for the project. Project objectives are: • Create a high -quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. • Provide a Project that is compatible in density and character to the surroundings residential communities. • Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 year old and older population. • Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single- family homes The City desires to provide single-family housing opportunities for the region's 55 and old population. This desire has also been expressed as a project objective. This alternative does not allow housing opportunities for the City's 55 and older population. For this reason, the City Council rejects this alternative. 25 TABLE 2 ABILITY OF ALTERNATIVES TO MEET PROJECT OBJECTIVES Project Objectives Create a high -quality residential community on the project site, focused on a product that will be available to serve the increasing rental market. Provide a project that is compatible in density and character to the surrounding residential communities. Be responsive to the City's desire to provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 and older population. Provide a housing product that is desirable in light of the competitive market and the increased availability of for -rent single-family homes. Alt. 1: No Project Alternative (No Development) No No M No Alt. 2: Existing Zoning with Senior Care Facility No Yes Yes WE C. Environmentally Superior Alternative Alt.3: Existing Alt.4: Zoning with Reduced Multi -Family Project Housing Alternative Yes Yes Yes are Yes Yes fm No An EIR must identify the environmentally superior alternative. The No Project Alternative (No Development) would be environmentally superior to the proposed project based on the minimization or avoidance of physical environmental impacts. However, the No Project Alternative (No Development) does not meet any of the Project objectives. In addition, CEQA Guidelines (Section 15126.6(c)) require that, if the environmentally superior alternative is the No Project Alternative (No Development), the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. 26 A summary comparison of the potential impacts associated with the alternatives and the proposed Project is provided in Table 3. Based on this comparison, Alternative Four (Reduced Project Alternative) is the environmentally superior alternative. However, Alternative Four would not fully achieve all of the Project objectives. It would not provide additional housing opportunities to the region's 55 and older population, nor would it provide increased availability of for -rent single-family homes. In addition, with the exception of construction noise, all impacts related to Alternative Four and the proposed project could be reduced to less than significant impacts with the implementation of fairly standard mitigation measures; the significant and unavoidable impacts related to construction noise that would occur with the proposed Project would occur with any development alternative at the Project site. TABLE 3 SUMMARY COMPARISON OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVE IMPACTS Alt.2: Alt.3: Alt. 1: No Existing Existing Project Zoning Zoning Alt.4: Alternative with Senior with Multi- Reduced Potential Project (No Care Family Project Impacts Development) Facility Housing Alternative Air Quality Reduced Reduced Similar Reduced Biological Resources Reduced Similar Similar Similar Cultural Resources Reduced Similar Similar Similar Geology, Soils, and Reduced Similar Similar Similar Seismicity Global Reduced Warming/Climate Reduced Reduced Similar Change Hazards and Reduced Similar Similar Similar Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Reduced Similar Similar Similar Quality Land Use Reduced Similar Similar Similar Noise Reduced Reduced Similar Reduced Population and Housing Reduced Reduced Reduced Reduced Public Services Reduced Reduced Reduced Reduced Traffic and Circulation Reduced Reduced Similar Reduced Utilities Reduced Similar Similar Reduced 27 D. The Project As Proposed Summary of Project The Project is described in detail in the EIR. 2. Reasons for Selecting Project as Proposed The City Council has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts of all the alternatives analyzed in the Final EIR and has compared them with those of the proposed Project. The City Council finds that each of the alternatives is infeasible for various economic, social, or other reasons set forth above. The City Council further finds that the Project as proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interest of the public and achieve the project goals. More specifically, the Project as proposed strikes a proper balance of providing high -quality residential development that services different age populations. that emphasizes a mixed -use environment in which residents benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities. This proposed project promotes sound environmental policies as discussed in detail in the EIR. For all of these reasons, the City Council selects the Project as proposed. 28 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The following Statement of Overriding Considerations is made in connection with the proposed approval of the Bella Linda Residential Project (the "Project"). CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve a project. If the benefits of the Project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered acceptable. CEQA requires the agency to provide written findings supporting the specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are unavoidable. Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or elsewhere in the administrative record. The reasons for proceeding with this Project despite the adverse environmental impacts that may result are provided in this Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City Council finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable impacts to noise generated by temporary construction activities. In making this finding, the City Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. The City Council finds that each one of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project. A. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to either lessen Project impacts to less than significant or to the extent feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the Project are infeasible because they generally have similar impacts, or they do not provide the benefits of the Project, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible as fully described in the Statement of Facts and Findings. B. The proposed Project will provide off -site improvements. Specifically, the Project applicant has agreed to provide landscaping north of the project site. This area is located at the beginning at the western most portion of the project site and extending north along Pechanga Parkway for approximately 1,050 feet. This area is currently vacant. The placement of landscaping along this stretch of road will beautify the area. C. The proposed Project area includes the concrete culvert and access road located off -site adjacent to the proposed single family lots. The culvert and access road will be replaced with a fully landscaped bio-swale and trail connection for residents of the project and surrounding communities. D. The proposed Project will create additional housing units that will provide residential opportunities for all age populations in the City. Overall available housing stock in the City will be increased. The City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided through approval of the Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts. The City Council further finds that each of the Project benefits discussed above outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. The City Council further finds that each of the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to override these unavoidable environmental impacts. C-1 1. Introduction TABLE 1-1 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Air Quality Impact Air-1: The project's Mitigation Measure Air-1: All construction equipment used onsite during project construction shall meet, at a Less than Significant construction emissions would exceed minimum, EPA Tier II certification requirements. As an alternative, the applicant may opt to apply other available SCAQMD's daily NOx significance technologies to the construction equipment that would achieve at least a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions threshold during the grading and than the use of Tier II construction equipment. Where alternatives to EPA Tier II are chosen for the proposed excavation phase and air quality project, the applicant shall be required to show evidence to the City that a 15 percent reduction in NOx emissions impacts associated with NOx would be would be achieved. significant. Biological Resources Impact Bio-1: Impacts to raptors and Mitigation Measure Bio-1: Impacts to raptors and other migratory birds shall be avoided by the implementation Less than Significant other migratory birds include direct of one of the following measures: loss of potential foraging and nesting - All construction and ground disturbing activities shall take place outside of the raptor breeding season habitat. Potential nesting habitat onsite (February 1-August 30). includes mature trees and shrubs as well as grassland (in the case of - If construction and ground disturbing activities are necessary during the breeding season (February 1-August ground -nesting birds such as northern 30), a focused survey for active nests of raptors and migratory birds shall be conducted by a biologist (a harrier and mourning dove). It is person possessing a bachelors in science with a minimum of one year nest survey experience performing possible that raptors and other raptor surveys). The survey shall occur a maximum of 14 days prior to any construction or ground -disturbing migratory birds would nest onsite due activities. If active nest(s) (with eggs or fledglings) are identified within the project site, (CDFG for state listed to the proximity to open space and species, species of special concern, and MSHCP covered species; LISFWS for birds covered under the preserved lands such as Temecula Migratory Bird Treaty Act and listed species) they shall not be disturbed until the young have hatched and Creek and the Pechanga Reservation fledged (matured to a state that they can leave the nest on their own). A 500-foot construction setback from lands. any active nesting location shall be adhered to in order to avoid disturbance of the nest until the young have fledged or the nest has failed, as determined by a qualified biologist. If no active nests are identified, construction may commence. Impact Bio-2: Burrowing owls could Mitigation Measure Bio-2: The entire project site shall be surveyed by a qualified biologist (i.e., approved by Less than Significant inhabit the site prior to project CDFG) using CDFG approved burrowing owl survey protocols a maximum of 30 days prior to construction to construction as appropriate burrowing determine presence/absence of burrowing owl (CDFG, 2012). If no burrowing owls are identified on the site owl foraging and nesting habitat is during these pre -construction surveys, no additional mitigation is necessary and construction can commence. If present. Potential impacts to this burrowing owl(s) are found onsite, CDFG, the City, and RCA will be notified. The following species -specific species would include loss of foraging mitigation actions would be required if burrowing owls are found: and nesting (i.e., burrowing) habitat. - Sheltering in place of nesting owls until nest fledges or fails, as determined by a qualified biologist (a Individual burrowing owls present Bachelor's of Science degree or equivalent experience and a minimum of one year of previous burrowing owl during grading and other construction monitoring experience). related activities have the potential to be killed or displaced through burrow - Preparing and implementing an active translocation plan, if appropriate and approved, and identifying a collapse and other impacts. receptor site for the owl(s) (per WRC MSHCP and CDFG). Bella Linda Residential Project 1-55 ESA / 120198 Final Environmental Impact Report March 2013 1. Introduction Environmental Impact Significance after Mitigation Measures Mitigation Cultural Resources Impact Cultural-1: The results of the Mitigation Measure Cultural-1 — Retention of a Qualified Archaeologist: Prior to the issuance of a grading Less than Significant Extended Phase I investigation, which permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, included archival research, defined as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for geoarchaeological review, Native archaeology (Department of the Interior, 2012) to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation American contact, field survey, and measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures Cultural-2, -3 and -5). Extended Phase I testing, suggest the Mitigation Measure Cultural-2 — Cultural Resources Training: The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist project area is sensitive for cultural working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the resources. In addition, representatives Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform of the Pechanga Tribe indicate the construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to project area is sensitive for cultural personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The applicant shall ensure that resources, and that the project area is construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation within the Luiseno Ancestral Origin demonstrating attendance. Landscape Area, one of the most sacred areas for the Pechanga Tribe. Mitigation Measure Cultural-3 — Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to the start of ground- disturbing activities, Although the lack of identified the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, subsurface archaeological materials including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of greatly reduces the likelihood of fencing and access roads. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more encountering buried archaeological than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep resources as a result of project daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that implementation, it does not preclude details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the this possibility entirely. The Pechanga Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. Tribe was consulted in preparation of Mitigation Measure Cultural-4 — Native American Monitoring: At least 30 days prior to beginning project this EIR section. construction, the applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City and the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and all ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. A minimum of 30 days prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground -disturbing activity, a Native American monitor from the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the applicant to monitor all ground -disturbing activities including, but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, as specified in the Agreement. If ground - disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Native American monitors may be required. Mitigation Measure Cultural-5 — Unanticipated Archaeological Resources Discoveries: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeofogical resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be Bella Linda Residential Project 1-6 ESA / 120198 Final Environmental Impact Report March 2013 1. Introduction Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Mitigation Measure Cultural-6 — Curation: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure Cultural-4). Mitigation Measure Cultural-7 — Discovery of Sacred Sites: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. Impact Cultural-2: If site preparation Mitigation Measure Cultural-8 — Paleontological Resources Training: Prior to construction, a training Less than Significant activities require grading 10 or more session on the recognition of the types of paleontological resources that could be encountered within the project feet below the ground surface, there area and the procedures to be followed if they are found shall be presented to project construction personnel by could be the potential to disturb and a qualified cultural resources professional. This training may be conducted concurrently with the cultural impact significant paleontological resources training required in Mitigation Measure Cultural-2. resources. Mitigation Measure Cultural-9 — Paleontological Resources Monitoring: During construction, should excavations be greater than ten feet in depth, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained and shall designate a paleontological monitor to observe the sediments. Should these sediments appear to have a greater potential for fossils, paleontological monitoring of ground disturbing activities below ten feet shall commence until such a time as the excavation of these sediments has ceased, or upon determination by the qualified paleontologist that the likelihood of encountering paleontological resources is unlikely. Mitigation Measure Cultural-10 — Unanticipated Paleontological Resources Discoveries: If construction or other project personnel discover any potential fossils during construction, or project operations and maintenance, regardless of the depth of work, work within 100 feet of the discovery location should cease and a qualified paleontologist should be called to further assess the discovery and make further recommendations as necessary. Impact Cultural-3: Because the Mitigation Measure Cultural-11 — Human Remains Discoveries: If human remains are encountered, Less than Significant proposed project would involve California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the ground -disturbing activities, it is Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public possible that such actions could Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision unearth, expose, or disturb previously as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to unknown human remains interred be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native outside of a formal cemetery. American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and the Agreement described in Mitigation Measure Cultural-4. Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant geology, soils, or seismicity impacts. Global Warming and Climate Change Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant global warming or climate change impacts. Bella Linda Residential Project 1-7 ESA / 120198 Final Environmental Impact Report March 2013 1. Introduction Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact Haz-1: Hazardous materials Mitigation Measure Haz-1: The use of construction best management practices shall be implemented as part of Less than Significant used onsite during construction construction to minimize the potential negative effects of accidental release of hazardous materials to activities (i.e., petroleum products, groundwater and soils. These shall include the following solvents, paints, etc.) could be a Follow manufacturer's recommendations on use, storage and disposal of chemical products used in released to the environment through construction; improper handling or storage, resulting in a potentially significant impact. • Avoid overtopping construction equipment fuel gas tanks; During routine maintenance of construction equipment, properly contain and remove grease and oils; and • Properly dispose of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and local and state regulations. Hydrology and Water Quality Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant hydrology or water quality impacts. Land Use Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant land use impacts. Population and Housing Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant population and housing impacts. Public Services Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant public service impacts. Noise Impact Noise-1: Construction Mitigation Measure Noise-1: The project proponent/developer shall ensure that all construction equipment will Significant and activities associated with the proposed have properly operating mufflers. Unavoidable project would generate a substantial Mitigation Measure Noise-2: Noise and groundborne vibration construction activities whose specific location on temporary or periodic increase in the project site may be flexible (e.g., operation of compressors and generators, cement mixing, general truck ambient noise levels in the project idling) shall be conducted as far as possible from the nearest noise- and vibration -sensitive land uses. vicinity and would expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial Mitigation Measure Noise-3: Construction activities associated with the proposed project shall, to the extent increases in noise levels. These noise feasible, be scheduled so as to avoid operating several pieces of equipment simultaneously, which causes high levels would result in substantial noise levels. temporary or periodic ambient noise Mitigation Measure Noised: Barriers such as plywood structures or flexible sound control curtains shall be levels at the following surrounding erected around the project site to minimize the amount of noise on the surrounding offsite sensitive receptors to sensitive land uses: residences the maximum extent feasible during construction. southeast of the project site across Mitigation Measure Noise-5: The project proponent/developer shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the Loma Linda Road, residences west of construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a contact number for the job site. the project site across the concrete- lined flood channel, residences Mitigation Measure Noise-6: Construction activities shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 northeast the project site across PM Monday through Saturday. Further, no construction activity shall be undertaken on Sundays and nationally Lane, and at the Pala Temecula L recognized holidays (Section 9.20.060 of the City's Municipal Code). Community Park. Bella Linda Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report — — 1-8 ESA /120198 March 2013 1. Introduction Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Impact Noise-2: Construction of the Mitigation Measure Noise-7: The operation of construction equipment that generates high levels of vibration, Less than Significant proposed project may expose such as large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills, shall be prohibited within 45 feet of existing nearby residences to the west of the project residential structures during construction of the proposed project. Instead, small rubber -tired bulldozers shall be site to vibration levels that would used within this area during grading and excavation operations. The use of small rubber -tired bulldozers would exceed the FTA's 80 VdB threshold for result in vibration levels of 0.002 PPV and 57 VdB at the residences to the west of the project site, which would residences or places where people not exceed the FTA's vibration criteria for building damage and human annoyance. may sleep. Impact Noise-3: Operation of the Mitigation Measure Noise-8: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that Less than Significant proposed project could expose nearby all new HVAC or mechanical equipment associated with the proposed project be designed with adequate sensitive resources to noise levels shielding (e.g., via rooftop parapet or enclosure) or noise muffling devices to ensure that noise levels would not exceeding 5 dB due to operation of exceed the ambient noise level on the premises of other occupied residential properties located offsite by more HVAC equipment at the project site. than five decibels. Mitigation Measure Noise-9: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall ensure that all exterior windows associated with the proposed residential uses at the project site shall be constructed to provide a sufficient amount of sound insulation to ensure that interior noise levels would be below an Ldn or CNEL of 45 dB in any habitable room. Utilities Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant utility impacts. Traffic and Circulation Impact Circ-1: The proposed project would result in significant impacts at the following intersections under the Project Phase 1 Opening Year (2015) Conditions: ■ 1-15 SB Ramps at Temecula Parkway -AM and PM Peak Hour Wolf Valley Road at Pechanga Parkway - PM Peak Hour Mitigation Measure Circ-1: The City shall provide for timing optimization at the following locations, funded by the project proponent/developer's fair share contribution, as indicated: Intersection of 1-15 SB Ramps and Temecula Parkway -AM and PM Peak Hour - Signal timing optimization: Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). ■ Improved AM operations to LOS D, delay of 42.1 seconds. Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 52.8 seconds. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 15%. Intersection of Wolf Valley Road at Pechanga Parkway - PM Peak Hour - Signal timing optimization: Cycle lengths were changed from 90 seconds to 150 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). Improved PM operations to LOS D, delay of 40.6 seconds. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 12%. Less than Significant Bella Linda Residential Project 1-9 ESA / 120198 Final Environmental Impact Report March 2013 1. Introduction Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Impact Circ-2: Under Future Buildout Mitigation Measure Circ-2: The following improvements shall be made by the City of Temecula, and funded by Less than Significant (2035) Plus Project conditions, the project proponent/developer's fair share contribution, as indicated: intersections at the following locations At the intersection of 1-15 NB Ramps and Temecula Parkway —AM Peak Hour would operate at below LOS D, resulting in potentially significant — Restripe westbound third through lane to shared through -right turn lane. impacts: — Signal timing optimization: Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier • 1-15 NB Ramps at Temecula volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the Parkway —AM Peak Hour TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). ■ Rainbow Canyon Road at Improved AM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.4 seconds. Pechanga Parkway — PM Peak Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 4%. Hour This intersection is within Caltrans jurisdiction and therefore any proposed mitigation measures require Caltrans approval. At the intersection of Pechanga Parkway at Rainbow Canyon Road — PM Peak Hour — Change eastbound right turn permissive phase overlap. — Signal timing optimization: Cycle lengths were changed from 90 seconds to 110 seconds in the PM peak hour. Phase timings were adjusted to proportion more time to the heavier volumes. Detailed Synchro reports with adjusted signal timing are included in Appendix O of the TIA (see Appendix H of the Draft EIR). Improved PM operations to LOS C, delay of 28.9 seconds. Fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure 9%. Bella Linda Residential Project 1-10 ESA / 120198 Final Environmental Impact Report March 2013 ORDINANCE NO. 13- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0276, A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 13 (PDO-13) ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. D. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density and architectural enhancements. E. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 public hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density and architectural enhancements. F. At the conclusion of the April 17, 2013 Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. G. The applicant chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. H. On October 2, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on October 2, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, and certify the new Final EIR for the project and approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the project. J. On November 26, 2013, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to and at the public hearing. K. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13- adopting the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. L. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13- adopting the Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay (PA13-0276). M. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zone Change A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the proposed land use designation for the property. Planned Development Overlay 13 will establish the design and development framework for the project. As proposed and conditioned, the project design will be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the existing Zoning Map on file with the City of Temecula City Clerk's office and approves the proposed Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay 13 (PDO-13) and adopts Sections 17.22.240 through 17.22.254 including the PDO-13 Text and Development Standards in the form attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of December, 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 13- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26t" day of November, 2013, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2013, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Bella Linda PDO-13 Prepared For: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 951.694.6444 Property Owner: Coyne DevelopmentNVaypoint Property 1400 Quail Street, Suite 260 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.300.9632 Prepared By: MDMG 41635 Enterprise Circle North, Suite B Temecula, CA 92590 951.296.3466 In conjunction with: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services Dahlin Group Architecture Planning The Alhambra Group RBF Consulting September 2013 Bella Linda Table of Contents 17.22.240 TITLE 3 17.22.242 PURPOSE 3 17.22.244 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN STANDARDS 3 17.22.246 USE REGULATIONS 3 17.22.248 SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS 4 17.22.250 PROJECT SETTING 5 A. Setting and Location 5 B. Existing Site Conditions 5 C. Surrounding Land Uses and Development 5 17.22.252 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6 A. Design Style 6 B. General Site Design 6 C. Condominium Site Design 7 D. Courtyard Site Design 7 E. Articulation of Design Facades 9 F. Styles 10 G. Streetscape 15 H. Massing and Scale 16 I. Materials, Finishes & Details 16 J. Varied Roof Planes 18 K. Garage Location and Design 18 L. Lighting 20 M. Trash Enclosures 22 N. Mail Boxes 23 O. Address Lettering 23 P. Mechanical Equipment & Vents 23 17.22.254 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS 25 A. Landscape Elements 25 B. Streetscenes 28 C. Hardscape 34 D. Entry Monumentation 34 E. Walls and Fences 34 F. Private Recreation Area 42 G. Arbors 42 H. Parks/Open Space 42 Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 1 Bella Linda List of Figures Figure 1 Overall Landscape Plan 26 Figure 1a Plant Palette 27 Figure 2 Courtyard Street 30 Figure 3 Internal Courtyard 31 Figure 4 Condominiums 32 Figure 5 Pechanga Parkway 33 Figure 6 Loma Linda Road 33 Figure 7 Temecula Lane 33 Figure 8 Walkways/ Roadways 36 Figure 9 Entry Monumentation Plan 37 Figure 10 Entry Monumentation Elevations 38 Figure 11 Wall and Fence Plan 39 Figure 12 Security Gate Details 40 Figure 13 Pechanga and Loma Linda Wall Elevation 41 Figure 14 Private Recreation Area Plans 43 Figure 15 Private Recreation Area Elevations 44 Figure 16 Parks/Open Space Overall Plan 45 Figure 17 Parks/Open Space Bioswale Plan 45 Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 2 Bella Linda 17.22.240 TITLE Section 17.22.240 through 17.22.254 shall be known as "PDO-13" (Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District). (Ord ). 17.22.242 PURPOSE The purpose of the Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District ("PDO-13") is to permit creative mixtures of uses in smaller areas where a specific plan or the village center overlay is not appropriate. The planned development overlay zoning district is intended to provide a mechanism to allow for flexibility in the development regulations and design standards and to allow mixtures of uses and clustering of land uses that are traditionally prohibited by conventional zoning. Through this flexibility in standards, many of the objectives of the general plan can best be achieved. The current zoning on the site is Professional Office (PO). These requirements are intended to provide regulations for the development of attached and detached residential development including senior motor court housing and multi- family condominiums within the City. 17.22.244 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN STANDARDS A. The permitted uses for the Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District are described in Section 17.22.246. In addition, the Medium (M) and High Density (H) residential uses permitted in Table 17.06.030 of the Development Code will be allowed in the Courtyard Housing and Condominium portions of PDO-13, respectively. B. Except as modified by the provisions of section 17.22.248 the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area: 1. The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 2. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are in effect at the time the application is deemed complete. 3. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. (Ord. 07-03 § 3) 17.22.246 USE REGULATIONS The Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-13) located between Temecula Lane and Pechanga Parkway just north of Loma Linda Road, is intended to provide for the development of up to 49 single-family detached homes on fee -simple lots on approximately 6.24 acres with a proposed density of 7.8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and 270 condominiums on 13.8 acres with a proposed density of 19.6 du/ac. The overall density allowed in PDO-13 is 15.8 du/ac. PDO-13 is comprised entirely of private residential land uses designed to enhance housing opportunities and develop a common community theme. PDO-13 will provide housing opportunities to those meeting a minimum age of 55. PDO-13 is consistent with the City's General Plan Policies by promoting equal housing opportunities and will provide for a visually pleasing environment through adoption of supplemental Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) Bella Linda performance standards that have been provided to ensure compatibility with the adjacent neighborhoods. A subsequent Home Product Review application shall be submitted on the single-family development. 17.22.248 SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS The residential component shall comply with the development standards set forth in the Table below. Table Residential Development Standards Bella Linda Planned Development Overlay District Residential Development Standards PDO-13 LOT AREA CONDOMINIUMS COURTYARD HOUSING Minimum net lot area (square feet) - 3600 S.F. Maximum number of dwelling units per gross acre 20 8 LOT DIMENSIONS Minimum average width 20' 60' Minimum lot depth 40' 60' BUILDING SETBACKS Minimum front yard 8' 8' Minimum corner side yard 12' 5' Minimum interior side yard Variable 5' Minimum rear yard - 5' Minimum building separation 10' 10' OTHER REQUIREMENTS Lot Coverage 35% 55% Maximum height 40' 35' S Open sace required 30% 20% Private open sacesquare feet/per unit 150 200 Notes: Property line goes to centerline of driveway- 2 Measured from back of curb. 3 The combined interior side yard setbacks shall not be less than ten feet and the distance between adjacent structures shall not be less than ten feet. This is intended to permit a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side yard and ten feet on the opposite side yard. 4 Measured from rear of building to rear of private open space easement. 5 Two-story homes are not allowed along the adjacent property line with the existing single-family homes to the north of the PDO-13. 6 A 4' setback is allowed to the garage and porch. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) Bella Linda 17.22.250 PROJECT SETTING A. Setting and Location PDO-13 is comprised of approximately 20.18 acres located between Temecula Lane and Pechanga Parkway just north of Loma Linda Road. B. Existing Site Conditions The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. Remnants of former developments are still present on the site (i.e., access roads, wooden building frame, culverts and retaining wall, landscaping, and manmade pond with decorative rock waterfall). As it is the only undeveloped property in the surrounding area, the trees provide the only stature on an otherwise level surface. Site topography is basically flat -lying and featureless. It has been altered in the past by grading. An earthen berm and a few stockpiles of excavated earth materials are present in the southern portion of the site. Elevation ranges from a high of about 1030 feet throughout the majority of the site to a low of 1020 feet in the northwest corner. Overall, the site slopes gently downward towards the northwest corner. C. Surrounding Land Uses and Development PDO-13 is bordered with open space (Pala Community Park and Temecula Creek) and single-family residential to the north, and single-family residential to the south, east and west (Low -Medium Density). Site Aerial Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) Bella Linda 17.22.252 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Design Style The architecture for PDO-13 site shall comply with the City's Municipal Code requirements contained in Sections 17.06.070.0 (Single -Family Detached Residential Developments) and 17.06.070.D (Multiple -Family or Attached Single -Family Residential Developments). The purpose of residential architectural guidelines is to provide guidance for the development within PDO-13. The preferred architectural styles for PDO-13 are: Spanish Eclectic, Spanish Colonial and Monterey. These architectural styles may apply to both the single-family and multiple family components of PDO-13. While these architectural styles are "preferred" in PDO-13, the design criteria is not meant to be restrictive, but rather to encourage a higher level of design direction and quality within the Spanish vernacular. The two types of residential products permitted in PDO-13 are discussed in greater detail below. 1. Courtyard Homes: The courtyard home is a unique style of home in that it functions as a traditional single-family detached home but the garage entrances are located off a shared, central courtyard -style driveway. Homes that are internal to the courtyard have their front door off the court while homes located adjacent to the street have a front door that faces the street. 2. Condominiums: The townhome condominiums are groupings of three or more housing units attached in a row, with shallow front yard setbacks and no rear yard as the garage is accessed from the rear of the home. This type of home is a wonderful addition when faced towards the street or towards an internal paseo as it adds vibrancy and a visual statement to the land. The condominiums are an efficient use of available land and provide a range of housing opportunities for residents wanting to live in the Bella Linda community. The condominiums at Bella Linda have varied configurations but are small enough to maintain a relatively intimately scaled and hospitable setting. Parking may be provided in garages located in proximity to each building, or as tuck under parking. B. General Site Design Various site plan elements and architectural elements/concepts shall be considered to create a quality neighborhood. These can include street trees, pedestrian connectivity, varied roof heights and pitches, color palettes and building materials that reflect the architectural style. The design criteria and architectural style is not meant to be restrictive, but rather to encourage a higher level of design direction and quality. Site Plan elements that shall be considered to produce a great neighborhood include: • Street trees • Pedestrian connectivity • Variable lot setbacks Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) Bella Linda Architectural elements/concepts that shall be considered to create a quality neighborhood include: • Architecture forward • Varied garage placement 3600 Architecture • Varied roof heights and pitches • Color palettes and building materials that reflect the architectural style C. Condominium Site Design Appropriate building siting can reduce the perceived density of multi -family development, maximize open space areas, provide "eyes" on the street, and enhance a sense of community by providing attractive and desirable spaces where people may gather and interact. • Ensure that residential buildings relate appropriately to surrounding land uses and streets through the use of complementary building arrangements, buffers, and avoidance of overwhelming building scale and visual obstructions. • Use courtyard siting arrangements, where appropriate, to complement similar siting in the area. • Use landscaping that complements existing landscape materials, location and massing on adjacent development. • Relate directly to the adjacent street and create a cohesive visual identity for the neighborhood and an attractive street scene for the passerby. • Promote efficient site layout in terms of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns. • Buildings shall be grouped to form distinct areas. • When possible, organize buildings around a common open space or courtyard. • Building shall have a street orientation parallel to primary perimeter streets, and provide setback variation to provide visual interest. • Portions of the development that are not parallel to the street shall be well integrated into the project's overall site design. D. Courtyard Site Design Appropriate building siting will allow the location of multiple single-family units closely plotted in proximity to each other. This type of development will provide for efficiencies in terms of driveways, entries and private spaces, while creating an attractive and functional street scene. • Residential buildings shall utilize a common driveway. • Building entries (for the units fronting the street) shall front the street. • Building entries shall be located off of the common driveway for units in the rear of the courtyard. • Guest parking shall be provided off of the common driveway. • Private yard areas shall be provided for each unit and shall not be adjacent to another private yard area within the courtyard. • Units shall be plotted and situated within the courtyard design to allow for maximum privacy between the units. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 7 Bella Linda • Adequate landscape buffers shall be provided between the units and any adjacent courtyard clusters. • Building shall have a street orientation parallel to primary perimeter streets, and provide setback variation to provide visual interest. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) Bella Linda E. Articulation of Design Facades • The building design shall incorporate 3600 architecture. • Architectural elements that add interest and character to the prescribed architectural styles, such as recessed windows, shall be provided. High quality materials shall be used to create a look of permanence within PDO- 13. Variations in color and material will be used in order to create interest and reduce a monotonous appearance. • Color palettes will be selected per the architectural style. Colors chosen for trim, windows, doors, and architectural elements will complement the material choices. • Fixtures and finishes will be selected for their contribution to the overall theme of the development. • Duplication of similar architectural styles shall not be permitted when adjacent to, across from or like architectural styles in the Courtyard product. The building design shall incorporate 3600 architecture. 3600 architecture means the appropriate articulation of all building facades, including variation in massing, roof forms, and wall planes, as well as surface articulation to create shadow patterns and massing shapes that contribute to a building's character. It is expected that the highest level of articulation will occur on the front fagade and facades visible from streets; however, similar and complementary massing, materials, and details are encouraged to be incorporated into the other building elevations. The use of elements such as overhangs, trellises, and awnings will be used to lend character to the building. Architectural elements that add interest and character, such as porches, balconies, and recessed windows shall be provided. High quality materials shall be used to create a look of permanence within PDO-13. Variations in color and material will be used in order to create interest and reduce a monotonous appearance. Color palettes will be selected per styles. Colors chosen for trim, windows, doors, and architectural elements will complement the siding and material choices. Fixtures and finishes will be selected for their contribution to the overall theme of the development. All single family dwellings will provide fire sprinklers in accordance with requirements of the City of Temecula Fire Prevention Division. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) Bella Linda F. Styles Spanish Eclectic Inspired by the architecture of Spain and Latin America, this style emphasizes rich and stylistic details. The Spanish Style has a low-pitched roof with little or no eave opening. Like other Spanish styles, is has a red tile roof with one or more gables. There are arches placed above the door and windows. The walls are typically made of stucco and asymmetrical entries are common. Standard Elements Form & Roof: • Generally two-story massing with a prominent one-story element • Generally, though not always, asymmetrical • Often "L" or "U" shaped and focused on a courtyard • Shallow root pitch of 4:12 to 5:12 • Predominantly gable and shed, some hip • Shed roof at entry and/or porch • Barrel "S" tiles Walls & Windows: • Smooth stucco preferred; may have soft trowel pattern • Thick appearance • Corbelling or trip (molding) shapes along roof line • Applied decorative elements such as pilasters, quoins, etc. • Vertical divided light casement, single -hung or double -hung windows • Often windows are arched, sometimes in pairs of threes • Typically deep-set windows Details: • Arcaded porches, sometimes supported by columns • May have limited classical order detail elements • Round tile or stacked barrel tile attic vents in gables • Sculpted walls and chimneys Colors: • Field: white or very light earth tones • Trim: darker earth tones for accent trim or elements (shutters, etc.) • Accents: white or deep jewel tones of red, green or blue for windows and doors Enhancement Opportunities: • Patterned tile decoration or sculptural "stone" relief inserts • Copper gutters and downspouts • May include accent surrounds (stone, stuccoed molding, decorative tile) • Wrought iron or painted metal features (e.g. balconies, window grills, etc.) Style Highlights 1. Thick stucco walls with barrel "S" tiles 2. Decorative tile and iron work 3. Arched windows Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 10 Bella Linda Spanish Eclectic Single -Family Spanish Eclectic Multi -Family Condominiums Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 11 Bella Linda Spanish Colonial Spanish Colonial is an adaptation of Mission Revival enriched with additional Latin American details and elements. The style attained widespread popularity after its use in the Panama -California Exposition of 1915. The simple courtyards of the Spanish Colonial heritage with hanging pots, a flowering garden and sprawling shade trees are hardly surpasses as foreground design elements. Further architectural distinction is established through the use of tile roofs, stucco walls, heavily textured wooden doors and highlighted ornamental ironwork. Standard Elements Form & Roof: • Square or rectangular plan form massing • Two-story massing with strong one-story elements • 4:12 to 5:12 roof pitch • Simple hip or gable roof • Barrel "S" tiles Walls & Windows: • Light sand -finish or light lace -stucco finish • Vertical hung six and eight paned windows Details: • Stucco -over -foam window and door trim • Arched stucco column porches and fully rounded arches • Clay pipe or half oval attic vents Enhancement Opportunities: • Simple, articulated two-story boxed plan massing with no more than 50% one-story element across the front elevation • Shed roof over porch • Stucco -sand finish • Feature recessed arched windows • Accent beveled glass recessed windows • Wrought iron balconies and accent details • Shaped rafter tails at feature areas • Feature ribbon windows three or more Style Highlights 1. Stucco walls with barrel tile roofs 2. Shallow sloped roofs with variegated colors 3. Thick walls with deep recessed openings 4. Detailing at openings 5. Decorative iron work Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 12 Bella Linda Spanish Colonial Sinale-Family Spanish Colonial Multi -Family Condominiums Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 13 Bella Linda Monterev The Monterey style is a combination of the original Spanish Colonial adobe construction methods with the basic two-story New England colonial building. Prior to this innovation in Monterey, all Spanish Colonial buildings were of single -story construction. First built by Thomas Larkin in 1835, the Monterey style introduced two-story construction and shingle -roofs to California. The Monterey style and its single -story counterpart eventually had a major influence of the development of modern architecture in the 1930's. Standard Elements Form & Roof: • Asymmetrical one and two-story massing • Main hip roof front to back 4:12 to 7:12 • Shed roof over balcony at 3.5:12 to 4.5:12 roof pitch • Barrel or "S" the roofs, concrete tile or shingle Walls & Windows: • Vertical, multi -paned windows at front elevation • Multi -paned windows or inserts on side and rear elevations in high visibility public views • Surface mounted fixtures on front elevations complement architectural style • Simple 2x window and door trim — wood on siding, foam on stucco, etc. Details: • Surface mounted fixtures on front elevations complement architectural style • Wood balcony and railing • Chimney top trim • Round tile attic vents and shutters on primary windows Colors: • Field: whites or light beige buff pink tints • Trim: off-whites, rust or light to dark brown (balconies) • Accents: deep jewel tones or green, blue and red (shutters) Enhancement Opportunities: • Simple plan with one-story break or gable end forward • Main hip roof front to back with one intersecting front facing gable roof • Siding accents at second floor, balcony and gable ends • Brick accents on lower story wall and veneer at first floor • Vertical window shape with multiple panes, often in groupings • Recessed accent windows • Decorative wrought iron accents Style Highlights 1. Simple volumes with gables running parallel with the street 2. Shallow -pitched roofs with variable roofing materials 3. Multi -paned windows 4. Incorporation of garden walls into architectural fagade Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 14 Bella Linda Monterey Sincile-Family Monterey Multi -Family Condominiums G. Streetscape The site planning, street design, and layout of PDO-13 is encouraged to have strong pedestrian orientation. The residential streetscape shall be designed in a manner that creates a visually appealing street. • Create an exciting intersection at Temecula Lane and the entrance to PDO-13. To accomplish this, consider enhanced landscaping with accent trees, provide for entry walls with enhanced materials such as stone, and decorative paving that complements the architectural style of PDO-13. • Create an environment where people feel comfortable walking and spending time. • Provide pedestrian scaled lighting fixtures. • Provide for outdoor seating areas where appropriate to create gathering places for residents and visitors. • Minimize garage visibility. • Use a variety of architectural styles, varied entry treatments, varied building heights and a variety of design details and building form along the street. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 15 Bella Linda H. Massing and Scale Visual interest in the streetscape is created in part through building articulation and a variety of forms between buildings. • There should be strong vertical accents and varied wall plane lines on front elevations. • Building forms should be appropriate to their architectural style. • There should be publicly visible balconies, veranda, and porches. • Front porches, when intended to provide outdoor space for residents, should be sufficiently sized to be usable for sitting. • There should not be overly repetitive, unarticulated building forms. • Style "appliqu6" on inappropriate building forms should be avoided. • Unarticulated roof forms should not be set on a constant wall plate height. • Boxy and monotonous facades that lack reference to human scale and have large expanses of flat walls should be avoided. • Buildings shall be designed to provide massing configurations with a variety of differing walls and roof planes. • Buildings should incorporate smaller -scale architectural forms such as bays, recessed or projecting balconies, and dormers that are associated with its architectural style, to visually reduce the height and scale of the building and emphasize the definition of individual units. • Varied building heights are encouraged, both to provide visual interest and give the appearance of a collection of smaller structures. I. Materials, Finishes & Details Details and materials should be appropriate to the style that the building is expressing. Appropriate and well thought out detailing should enhance the perception of the community's quality. • Gutters, downspouts, and rainwater leader heads should be integral to the roof or wall detailing and be designed as part of the fagade. • Roofing materials should be appropriate to their related style and pitch. Changes in materials should occur at inside corners where the building plane changes direction. • Homes should have a color palette that, at a minimum, includes a body color, trim color and accent color. • Wall mounted lights for accents and porches shall be complimentary to the architectural style as depicted below, or an approved equal, as determined by the Director of Planning. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 16 Bella Linda Spanish Eclectic Maxim Lighting 'Odessa ES' Model #85014LTE5 Espresso Spanish Colonial Maxim Lighting 'Dover ES' Model*86094FSBZ Bronze Monprwf Maxim Lighting 'Balboa ES VIVEX' Model *85163GFCO Copper Oxide • Doors shall be enhanced and complimentary to the architectural style as depicted below, or an approved equal, as determined by the Director of Planning. SPANISH SPANISH SPANISH n101Nh, :7a'��e7>��]► 10 �Ce y7Ce7 THERMA TRU DOORS TLERMATRUDOORS 'AMBOCAN SfriE COLLEC71OW 'CLASSIC -CRAFT RUSTIC COLLECTION MODEL NO. CCAW MODEL NO. CCR8705 (WTR14 BLOCK DEMIL SF W ACCESSO" TI€MM TRU DOORS TWK-CLASSIC OAK COLLECTION MODEL NO. 7150 RD TEERAM TRU DOORS I AiW4CRAFT RUSTIC COLLECTION MODEL NO.00RBWO Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 17 Bella Linda J. Varied Roof Planes Varying roof forms/changes in roof plane shall be used to minimize a flat, repetitious plane. Multiple rooflines can be used to create a visually appealing silhouette and will be considered when the building elevations are visible form a public street. • Roof eaves should extend out from the primary wall surface to enhance shadow lines and articulation of wall surfaces. • Varying roof forms/changes in roof plane shall be used to minimize a flat, repetitious plane. • Multiple rooflines can be used to create a visually appealing silhouette and will be considered when the building elevations are visible from a public street. • Flat roofs are prohibited. K. Garage Location and Design Because of the unique courtyard design of PDO-13, garages for the Courtyard homes will be accessed via a shared driveway off the street. Parking clusters are a good strategy for reducing the frequency of curb cuts, parking aprons and garages on the streetscape. • The dwelling unit driveways serving a cluster of homes shall be a maximum of 20' wide. However, an accent -paved pedestrian walkway from the street to the auto court is required. • Garage doors shall be consistent with the architectural style of the home. • A garage shall not occur directly at the end of a parking court vista as viewed from the street. Rather, it shall be offset to one side such that the front porch and entry/or a green space may occur at the end of the vista as a focal point. Parking may also be allowed in this space. • To discourage obstruction of the driveway, garage aprons shall be no more than 6' feet deep or no less than 18' deep as measured from the property line. The deeper parking aprons should be limited to the rear units not visible from the street. • Individual private driveway aprons should be reduced to be minimum functional width of 16'. • Garage doors shall have a minimum paved back -out dimension of 25'. Paved back -out area may include any continuous combination of apron, neighboring apron, driveway and common court areas. • Planting pockets should be used between garage doors. • The multi -family area shall provide parking in accordance with the City of Temecula standards. Guest parking shall be in a location convenient to the buildings that the spaces are intended to serve. • The design of garages shall be representative of the architectural styles of the Bella Linda project. • Garage roofs shall incorporate roof slopes and materials to match adjacent buildings. • Flat roofs on garages and ancillary structures are discouraged. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 18 Bella Linda M i.CF, SiG� ;UGHT UDE Pechanga Parkway Enhanced Elevations Internal Project Un-Enhanced Elevation Detached 11 Car Garages Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 19 Bella Linda L. Lighting Exterior lighting can provide safe and effective evening character illumination for the pedestrian and vehicular areas of roads, sidewalks, and walkways through the Bella Linda community. Design should reflect the concept and character of the community through illumination level, light fixture type, finish color and location. Ornamental/decorative streetlights will be required along Project roadways, and at Project locations that are visible from the public view. Less decorative (more functional) freestanding lighting fixtures will be allowed on the Project site, where there is limited public exposure. • The level of on -site lighting shall comply with any and all applicable requirements of the City of Temecula. • All lighting on -site shall meet the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. • All exterior lighting fixtures shall be consistent with the architectural style for the building that is serves. • All exterior light sources in parking lots and on community accessory structures associated with the condominiums shall be properly shielded to prevent direct view from interiors of individual units. • Each residence shall have a porch light or similar at each door. • Each home or unit with an alley loaded garage shall be provided with at least one coach light on the elevation facing the alley or side street that serves the garage. Such lights shall be controlled independently by photo sensors and shall be illuminated from dusk to dawn. • Street lights shall be single armed on 14' high poles to reduce glare and the impact of lighting on residences. • Lighting shall be low-voltage/high-efficiency whenever possible. • Street lights shall be focused downward to ensure pedestrian safety and way finding. • Footpath lights are acceptable as a means to illuminate a secondary path. • Inset stairway and stair step lights are encouraged to ensure pedestrian safety and way -finding. • Building mounted lighting fixtures are encouraged to be selected and located to cast downward and be shielded to minimize glare. • Lighting from buildings can be balanced with street lighting to ensure areas are not over lit. • Accent lighting shall emphasize special features such as fountains, sculptures, wall niches, signs, planters or accent trees for decorative effects. • Accent lighting shall be inconspicuous and durable. • Small scale accent lights such as LED based fixtures can serve for way -finding or be used themselves as special design elements. • Flashing, neon, moving, high -intensity or exposed light source type luminaries are not permitted. Lighting fixtures should be selected to complement the architecture and layout of PDO- 13. The quantity and quality of light, as measured in foot-candles, should be consistent with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance. Lighting levels should not be so intense as to draw attention to the glow or glare of the PDO-13 site. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 20 Bella Linda M Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 21 Bella Linda M. Trash Enclosures • Trash enclosures should be separated from adjacent parking stalls with a minimum of 5' wide (interior clear dimension) planter and a 12" wide paved surface behind the curb to ensure adequate space is available for individuals to access a vehicle. • Trash/recycling containers should be large enough, placed frequently throughout the site, and collected frequently enough to handle the refuse generated by the project. Trash enclosures should be designed with similar finishes, materials, and details as the primary buildings and shall be screened with landscaping. Chain link fencing and gates with wood slats are not allowed. Enclosures should be unobtrusive and conveniently located for trash disposal by tenants and for collection service vehicles. Where feasible, a pedestrian entrance to the trash enclosure should be provided so that large access doors do not have to be opened. • Enclosures should not be visible from primary entry drives. • Enclosures shall have a concrete apron onto which trash/recycling containers will be rolled for collection. L a .Iml LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION FR©Nr ELEVA ION Trash Enclosures Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 22 Bella Linda N. Mail Boxes Once construction documents are underway, a mailbox master plan will be created and coordinated with the United States Postal Service, identifying type and location of mailbox structures. • All mailboxes shall be enclosed with some form of decorative trellis. • All mailbox trellises shall be softened through the use of landscaping to include shrubs and vines. Ark Z •".��J�q'�. n m }y �' f •1. a3.•f - x` O. Address Lettering • Color house or unit address numbers and letters shall be of a contrasting color to the background to which they are attached and must be visible at all times. • All homes with alley loaded garages shall have numbers and letters visible from the alley. A sign or plaque may be utilized for directional purposes. • All address lettering shall be illuminated from dusk to dawn. • Addressing for all single-family development shall be visible from the street. P. Mechanical Equipment & Vents • On -site mechanical equipment visible from buildings or public streets should be screened. • Roof mounted mechanical equipment is prohibited on all product types. • Wall mounted mechanical equipment that protrudes more than six inches from the outer building wall shall be screened from view by structural features that are compatible with the architecture or the subject buildings. Wall mounted mechanical equipment that protrudes six inches or less from the outer building wall shall be designed to blend with the color and architectural design of the subject building. • Ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view by a decorative architectural structure or landscape screening that is compatible with the architecture and landscaping of the development site. Such screening Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 23 Bella Linda devices shall be of a height equal to or greater than the height of the mechanical equipment being screened. • Roof flashing vents exposed to public view shall be painted or otherwise given a finish to match adjacent surfaces or concealed in a manner consistent with the building's appearance. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 24 Bella Linda 17.22.254 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS A. Landscape Elements (reference Figures 1 and 1a) Landscape of PDO-13 shall conform to Section 17.06.060 (Residential District, Landscape Standards) of the City's Municipal Code. Landscape plans shall be required as a part of the Development Plan for PDO-13 and shall include the following: • The landscape design of PDO-13 consists of a combination of ornamental plants and the use of drought -tolerant plant materials, consistent with the project plant palette. (Reference Figure 1a) • Streetscape for the proposed street in PDO-13 shall be planted with a minimum 24" box specimen size street tree spaced at 30' on center spacing (maximum) with a combination of 15-gallon and 5-gallon shrubs and ground cover. Flowering ground cover will be provided to fill any voids in the streetscape landscape. • The PDO-13 entry shall be designed to create an architectural statement as well as a landscape statement that reflects the architectural character of PDO-13. • Common areas shall be landscaped with appropriate shrubs, trees and ground cover and shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association for PDO-13. • Common front yard landscape shall be developed to provide community landscape theme and landscape character for PDO-13. All common from yards will have automatic irrigations systems maintained by the Homeowners Association. Appropriate ornamental and drought tolerant plant materials shall be used as follows: • One 24" box specimen tree per unit and an additional two trees at street corners. • Five gallon shrubs for building foundation planting and along the fence line. • Five gallon shrubs as needed for accent color and mass planting. • Sodded turf and ground covers as needed. All Common Landscape areas shall be landscaped per the above standards and maintained by the Homeowners Association for PDO-13. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 25 Bella Linda 4. ti L. \I' L �s ltf-I Figure 1 Overall Landscape Plan J M. v Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 26 Bella Linda Figure I Plan Palette $ » . }6 s6\ ($���$� $ / i $I�$$§� 9� �2 � § ■ �.�4�.■ �§�§■§� &&&f�§§§§� m � @ § 'K�.��■■a aaa§§ @/ @ • K,\§ / :ci w {@;@■ƒ. § ..,...,.... .. � � in. w w § §§&§ 2 2 ,§§j� & �j • § , $� § §)!� IJ ��&■2§ §§ § � k§ 2 § § !§ ■ � -§ e § . § K § •. & . -. .. §§2KB)|j(W§&2b2k§U2 2 0 0 0 c O■ O E) 0{ f e o @ « @ 000 Planned Development OM7(Do13) 27 Bella Linda B. Streetscenes The following text and figures describes the streetscenes contained in PDO-13. The streetscenes have been designed in a comprehensive manner to provide continuity within PDO-13 as well as compatibility with the existing, surrounding development. 1. Courtyard Housing - Street (reference Figure 2) The courtyard housing street provides direct access to the single-family units. The courtyard housing street has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 32'. The typical design standards for neighborhood streets include two travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached sidewalk. Neighborhood Streets are used to accommodate moderate to low traffic volumes. Vertical curbs are used. 2. Internal Courtyard - Drive (reference Figure 3) The internal courtyard drive for the courtyard housing is accessed via the senior courtyard housing street. The internal courtyard drive has a proposed width of 20' between each garage apron and each home has a 4' apron to access the garage, providing a width of 28' from garage door to garage door. Small planter areas 4' deep are used as separation from the courtyard drive to the house and two parking stalls are provided at the end of each courtyard drive. Curbs are not encouraged in the courtyard drive. 3. Condominiums (reference Figure 4) a. Facing A travel lane is provided in front of the condominiums for parking purposes and vehicular circulation. The travel lane is 24' and has 90-degree parking on each side of the travel lane. Planter areas are provided as visual relief every 10 spaces. b. Back-to-back Alleys are used to provide automobile access and service areas for condominiums with rear -loaded garages. The design standard for this street type provides a 24' wide back -of curb- to back -of -curb dimension that allows two-way travel. A 5' landscape area has been provided between the garage doors to soften the hardscape and structures at the pedestrian level. 4. Pechanga Parkway (reference Figure 5) Pechanga Parkway is classified as a Principal Arterial in the City of Temecula and has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 86'. The design standards for Pechanga Parkway include four travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached sidewalk. Adjacent to the Bella Linda project, a 20' wide pedestrian corridor with a meandering path lines the street and creates separation from the road to the residences. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 28 Bella Linda 5. Loma Linda Road (reference Figure 6) Loma Linda Road is classified as a Collector in the City of Temecula and has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 44'. The design standards for Loma Linda Road include four travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached sidewalk. Adjacent to the Bella Linda project, a 12' wide pedestrian corridor with a meandering path lines the street and creates separation from the road to the residences. Pedestrian connections are provided to the individual units. Vertical curbs are used. Vertical curbs are used. 6. Temecula Lane (reference Figure 7) Temecula Lane provides direct access to each development area within the Bella Linda project, and has a proposed face of curb to face of curb width of 40'. Temecula lane includes two travel lanes with space for on -street parallel parking and an adjacent attached or detached 5' sidewalk. Vertical curbs are used. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 29 Bella Linda Figure 2 Courtyard Street J Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 30 Bella Linda Figure 3 Internal Courtyard Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 31 Bella Linda Figure 4 Condominiums Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 32 Bella Linda Figure 5 Pechanga Parkway r LOW CNWN00014i SHRUB S EL7 TIME MEANDERING SMALN / �/�NQA PARKWAY f 1 ' 4:1Qi:'G+c rl ' .«ram. «-°f.�:M+..ti,;'ss's• "�';j _ Fiaure 6 Figure 7 Temecula Lane gar' rE R� IIz .Irk v�i +w� +rr�r �cs� i� rr Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 33 Bella Linda C. Hardscape (reference Figure 8) Entrances and focal points within the Bella Linda community shall have pavers or Stamped and stained concrete to match the architectural style of the overall community. D. Entry Monumentation (reference Figures 9 and 10) Entry monuments are the gateway features that create a community. Functionally is signs "Bella Linda" and demarcates it as a place. Aesthetically, their design can reflect and express the character and high quality of the community. It can tie to the landscape and use a rich palette of plantings and local indigenous material. These entry monuments must have a formal relationship with the entry in order to create a connection from the community to the public. The entry monuments are encouraged to contain accent lighting to make signage visible at night. Entry features can serve as more dramatic and formalized spaces that define the community. Entry features can provide a richer variety of spaces defined by artful treatments of entry arbors, gentle land sculpting and planting. As a focal point for the community, the design of the entry feature off Temecula Lane is encouraged to be the most dramatic and interesting. It provides a great opportunity to incorporate through design, the ties to architectural style of PDO-13. The PDO-13 entry and site amenities will complement one another and reflect the overall architectural theme of PDO-13. The use of pilasters, special paving treatments, and landscaping will be used to create an easily identifiable entry way. Project entries should be easily identifiable and aesthetically pleasing and be designed to complement the style of the project. • A combination of ornamental landscaping, architectural monuments, decorative signs and/or enhanced paving shall be incorporated into the project entry as accent features. • Project entry features shall reflect the overall architectural identity and character of the project. E. Walls, Fences and Gates (reference Figures 11, 12 and 13) Walls provide edges, grade retention, spatial definition and privacy, but will also enhance the design character of PDO-13. Their design is encouraged to reflect the community environment through recalling historic wall design with materials, stone or masonry unit size and joinery. Materials, texture and color should be used to make walls visually interesting and compatible with the architectural and landscape architecture design. • Fences and walls should be minimized along public and private street right-of- way. • Walls should be stepped to follow the terrain. • Landscaping should be used to soften walls. • Landscape materials will complement the architectural theme. • Stone veneer, masonry, block and wrought iron combinations are acceptable. • Wood fence material should be of the quality to stain so as to prevent rotting and weathering. • Vinyl fencing is allowed along interior conditions. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 34 Bella Linda • Walls may be covered with stucco in colors suitable to the architectural theme. • Stone surfaces may remain natural and unpainted. • Materials, colors and textures shall be varied to create interest and relieve visual monotony. • Barbed wire, wire, electrically charged fences, corrugated metal, chain link, and grape -stake fencing is prohibited. • For the condominium site, directory signs containing site plans of the development with building addresses or numbers shall be provided at locations along the main entrance. • Security gates shall be provided to the entrance of the courtyard homes and after the main entrance to the condominium site. Adequate vehicular turn around space shall be provided in front of each gate for vehicles that do not wish to enter the developments. • Security gates shall be electronically mechanized with remote access and keypad access. • Security gates shall be constructed with durable and weather resistant materials. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 35 Bella Linda Figure 8 Walkways/Roadways Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 36 Bella Linda Figure 9 Entry Monumentation Plans Temecula Lane — Senior Pechang,a ParkwavlLoma Linda Temecula Lane - Condominiums Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 37 Bella Linda Figure 10 Entry Monumentation Elevations STUCCO (COLOR TO MATCH BUILDINGS) �- TB' SO. PLASTER ` 9' TALL METAL LETTERS W/ LEDGESTONE VENEER STYLE AND COLOR BY OWNER TYPE PER OWNER (SETY& DI PAVER) (SELECTED RY OWNER) PRECAST CONCRETE GAP y� B w ■ { ll A. ;sue SI NOTE MONUMENT SHALL BE LEDGMTONE VENEER RLUYNATED BY (3) 13W (SELECTED BY OWNER) DIRECT BURIAL PRECAST CONCRETE FLOODLIGHTS Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 38 Bella Linda Figure 11 Wall and Fence Plan Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 39 zr % I►M i1fiU. Bella Linda Figure 12 Security Gate Details p rt .. Condominium Entry Gates s/e- sa TS GAM-.1 aG TR_ 1-11-1/2• vs RALS AP. eK : 9M rv,� ............. u161 . a- wn. sti na[ rt]u NL MOJO M. Condominium Entry Main Gate ;to w/e• opL Raw SIM CAFE flW[ 0 �. . MR FIG UQ. ! OUP WM Courtyard Entry Main and Man Gates 4• CM K S L CLOIPEOM •M �10065 A LO SELF CIOSIp V/ NIAW! PER (IRY OR u10. hats PER o.IER barn � E% rw � ¢olawr tvR o¢r s+atFm Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 40 Bella Linda Figure 13 Pechanga and Loma Linda Wall Elevation Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 41 Bella Linda F. Private Recreation Area (reference Figures 14 and 15) The Recreational Center shall be an active use facility to provide a family oriented center including the development of a child tot lot with a special play equipment structure. The center shall include a recreational pool with generous pool activity areas for social functions. A minimum 20% of the recreation area shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. G. Arbors Arbors provide shaded resting spaces for walkers, define spaces, mark entries with gateways and create opportunities for a beautiful mix of plants. Their design can both tie to the region's past and reflect the newness of the community. H. Parks/Open Space (reference Figures 16 and 17) Quality materials will create exceptional public spaces with unique and timeless character. Products and materials in the public realm should be extremely durable and easy to maintain. They should be resistant to regional weather extremes and should also be resistant to vandalism with non -breakable parts, and be scratch resistant with washable surfaces. Examples of durable materials and finishes include: • Stainless Steel • Galvanized Steel • Powder -coated steel or aluminum • Vinyl -coated steel or aluminum • Painted steel with multiple coats • Masonry Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 42 Bella Linda Figure 14 Private Recreation Area Plan Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 43 Bella Linda Figure 15 Private Recreation Area Elevations Sy" glnj !C. JIL _ k <tur:�re eronnnrax�N Ou>huarc. sr,.anr..r..� DDT KmnN 3- LEFT WE B"ATION I� H FRER= RURDNO - IK)"T SM MATR7N ERERO� RULOM - WM aWATR]N EREROISE RURDNG - FROM E4FVATION Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 44 Bella Linda 0 Figure 16 Parks/Open Space Overall Plan e 1w Figure 17 Parks/Open Space Bioswale Plan 1310 'WALE TYP. W/ 3-6' DIA. COBBLE t Planned Development Overlay (PDO-13) 45 RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0277, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 57 LOTS FROM THREE EXISTING PARCELS TOTALING 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. D. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. E. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 public hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. F. At the conclusion of the April 17, 2013 Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277; a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. G. The applicant chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. H. On October 2, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on October 2, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. I. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for the Project. J. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277; a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, and certify the new Final EIR for the project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the project. K. On November 26, 2013, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to and at the public hearing. L. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13- adopting the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. M. Following the hearing, the Council also adopted Resolution No. 13- adopting the Tentative Tract Map (PA11-0277). N. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Tentative Tract Map application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; As designed and conditioned, the proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Temecula General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; The proposed map does not impact land designated for conservation or agricultural use. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The proposed map subdivides 22.73 acres to allow for 270 condominium units and 49 lots for age restricted single-family homes. The proposed Tentative Tract Map design is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and the development standards for the Planned Development Overlay 13 zoning designation. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on vacant property. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the project. As conditioned, the subdivision is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with Fire and Building Codes and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. A Statement of Overriding Consideration has been provided in order to account for temporary construction noises. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities to the extent feasible. All development must meet appropriate Building and Fire Code requirements as they relate to passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided; All acquired rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act); The project involves the construction of multi -family and single-family residential units. The project has been conditioned to ensure the City's parkland dedication requirements are met. Section 3. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels totaling 22.73 acres generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of November, 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of November, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Planning Application No.: Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1*A:1141W-11 CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA11-0277 A Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels totaling 22.73 acres. 961-450-012, 961-450-013, and 961-450-003 Residential (Greater than 14.1 DU) Residential (270 Units Attached, 49 Units Detached) Residential (270 Units Multi -Family, 49 Units Single Family) Multi -Family Attached (5 or More Units), Single -Family (Attached Garage) November 26, 2013 November 26, 2016 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount in the amount of Three Thousand Forty -Five Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($3,045.25) which includes the Two Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety -Five Dollars and Twenty -Five Cents ($2,995.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL-2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed, for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-4. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 5 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-6. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Bella Linda Residential Project Environmental Impact Report. PL-7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL-8. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. PL-9. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map PL-10. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. PL-11. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (Bella Linda Residential Project) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone. PL-12. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. PL-13. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are required bythis approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. PL-14. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. PL-15. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. PL-16. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the Project's Water Quality Management Plan. PL-17. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. PL-18. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. PL-19. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. PL-20. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. PL-21. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. PL-22. Maintenance agreements for the multi -family and single-family units must be provided that ensure access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. PL-23. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA 1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. 2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. 3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC&Rs. 4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Planning Director of the City of Temecula. PL-24. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant's signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. Patrick Richardson Director Community Development Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney PL-25. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. PL-26. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. PL-27. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Department. PL-28. Per Municipal Code Chapter 17.30, "Smoking in Multi -Unit Residences," the Developer shall submit a site plan to the City for review and approval, designating a minimum of 25 percent of the units within the project as non-smoking units. PL-29 The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in -lieu fees equivalent to 2.79 acres of parkland, based upon the City's then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 40% credit for private recreational opportunities provided. PUBLIC WORKS General Requirements PW-1. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed bythe developer at no cost to any Government Agency. PW-2. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the Tentative Map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW-3. A Grading Permit for rough grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained street right-of-way. PW-4. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW-5. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW-6. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non -permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm water conveyance system or receiving water during all field activities. PW-7. An updated version of the conceptually -accepted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be submitted to the Department of Public Works as part of the initial grading plan submittal package. PW-8. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the accepted WQMP PW-9. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained PW-10. The vehicular movement for the proposed southerly driveway on Loma Linda Road is restricted to right in/right out only. Prior to approval of the Tract Map, unless other timing is indicated, the developer shall complete or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted. PW-11. The Developer shall process the required documents to affect the proposed sale of Lot 87 of Tract Map No. 21067 (APN 961-450-003) from the City to the Developer, including costs of the appraisal and staff/legal review. PW-12. The Developer shall provide a drainage easement at the southwest corner of the property to accommodate four 10' x 7' reinforced concrete box storm drain facility as shown on the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Project No. PW99-11 PW-13. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Army Corps of Engineers c. California Department of Fish and Wildlife d. Rancho California Water District e. Eastern Municipal Water District f. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District g. Verizon h. Southern California Edision Company i. Southern California Gas Company, or other affected agencies PW-14. The developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public improvements outlined in these conditions to the City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. a. Pechanga Parkway from Loma Linda Road to the western property boundary (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of sidewalk, parkway improvements and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), b. Loma Linda Road (Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) Highway Standard No. 102-88' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). c. Temecula Lane (General Local Street Standard No. 104-60' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW-15. The Developer shall design the following private streets to meet City public road standard. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Street "A" (Private Street - 55' R/E) to include installation of full -width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Development Plan PW-16. Unless otherwise approved, all criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans. a. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Number 207A b. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets and shall be designed in accordance with City Standards Number 800. c. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. PW-17. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right- of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and the utility provider. PW-18. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Pechanga Parkway on the Tract Map as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. PW-19. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Loma Linda Road from Pechanga Parkway to Temecula Lane on the Tract Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. PW-20. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Temecula Lane from Loma Linda Road to Canterfield Drive on the Tract Map with the exception of three openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map PW-21. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. PW-22. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. PW-23. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. PW-24. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW-25. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. PW-26. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On -site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW-27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must receive final acceptance by the City prior to issuance of any grading permit. PW-28. The project shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement that must include the owner's notarized signature, proof of recordation with the County Recorder's Office, and all maintenance procedures for each of the structural treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the WQMP PW-29. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. California Department of Fish and Wildlife b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District PW-30. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The Grading Plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW-31. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. PW-32. The Geologic Study shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the County Geologist. PW-33. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities to mitigate the 100-year storm event from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off site or on -site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. PW-34. The Developer shall obtain and submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW-35. Construction -phase pollution prevention shall be consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 18.15 and associated technical manual and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control PW-36. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the project's Risk Level (RL) determination number, and name, contact information, and certification number of the Qualified SW PPP Developer (QSD). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW-37. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with the Construction, Grading and Encroachment Ordinance Section 18.24.140 PW-38. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PW-39. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. PW-40. The developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW-41. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map No. 36415 shall be approved and recorded. PW-42. The Developer shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW-43. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation, and the soils engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW-44. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the Grading Permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The Final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough Grading Plan. PW-45. PW-45. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (DIF) as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. PW-46. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW-47. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer shall pay its fair share contribution for offsite improvements as identified in the Project's Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 2012 (Section H of the EIR). PW-48. The project shall demonstrate that all of the structural water quality facilities outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW-49. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-50. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for the multi -family buildings and 1,500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on -site and off site 6" x 4" x 2-2'/2" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350- feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210- feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant for multi -family buildings and 500- feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250- feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant for single family dwellings. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-4. Maximum cul-de-sac- length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-5. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-6. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet of clear width and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches for multi -family buildings and 20 feet of clear width and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches for single family dwellings. Fire access roads cannot have any obstructions. Clear width means no parking and no trash bins located in the street (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-7. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-8. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). F-9. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-10. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5). F-11. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. All structures for this proposed development will require fire sprinklers. F-12. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Fire alarm systems are required for all the multi -family buildings and commercial structures. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-13. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-14. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Multi -family residential shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. Single family residences and multi -family residential units shall have 4-inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-15. A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. F-16. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). F-17. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). F-18. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). F-19. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. RESOLUTION NO. 13- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0275, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE CONSISTING OF A 270 UNIT CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES AND 49 AGE RESTRICTED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276 a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. D. On March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 20, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. E. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 public hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density and architectural enhancements. F. At the conclusion of the April 17, 2013 Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan. G. The applicant then chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. H. On October 2, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on October 2, 2013, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. I. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for the Project. J. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan and certify the new Final EIR for the Project and approved Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Consideration for the Project. K. On November 26 2013, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to and at the public hearing. L. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13- adopting the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. M. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 13- _ adopting the Development Plan (PA13-0275) N. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Development Plan application pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.05.010.F, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11-0275, a Development Plan to construct a residential project on a 22.73 acre site consisting of a 270 condominium unit complex and associated amenities and 49 age restricted single-family units, generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of November, 2013. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 13- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of November, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA11-0275 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a residential project on a 22.73 acre site consisting of a 270 unit condominium complex with associated amenities and 49 age restricted single-family lots generally located at the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road Assessor's Parcel No MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date Expiration Date PLANNING DEPARTMENT 961-450-012, 961-450-013, and 961-450-003 Residential (Greater than 14.1 DU) Residential (270 Units Attached, 49 Units Detached) Residential (270 Units Multi -Family, 49 Units Single Family) Multi -Family Attached (5 or More Units), Single -Family (Attached Garage) November 26, 2013 November 26, 2015 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. General Requirements PL-2. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-3. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-4. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-5 The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Bella Linda Residential Project Environmental Impact Report. PL-6. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL-7. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-8. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-9. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL-10. The applicant shall paint a three-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL-11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL-12. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Spanish Colonial Roof Eagle, Kings Canyon Blend #3634 Stone Eldorado Stone, York Limestone Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Entry Doors Entry Doors Frazee Paint, CLV1182N Trip Trim Iron Work Balconies/Stairs Spanish Eclectic Roof Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Entry Doors Entry Doors Along Parkway/Loma Linda Road Trim Iron Work Balconies/Stairs Monterey Roof Brick Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Entry Doors Entry Doors Along Parkway/Loma Linda Road Trim Balconies/Stairs Clubhouse/Exercise Room Roof Stone Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Entry Doors Trim Temecula Temecula Frazee Paint, CL2793M, Nankeen Frazee Paint, CL2915D, Pinesap Frazee Paint, CL2917N, Hemlock Frazee Paint, CLV1182N Trip Thurma Tru Doors, Classic Craft Rustic Collection #CCR8205 Frazee Paint, CLW1013W, Akamina Frazee Paint, CL3187N, Witching Hour PLI-Dek Systems, Inc. Hickory Eagle, Sunset Blend #3646 Frazee Paint, CLW 1011 W, Mere Mortal Frazee Paint, CL 2734D, Tabby Frazee Paint, CL 2736N, Almost Ochre Frazee Paint, CL3116D, Norwester Thurma Tru Doors, Classic Craft Rustic Collection #CCR8040 / Fiber Classic Oak Collection #2150RG Frazee Paint, CLW1013 Akamina Frazee Paint, CL 3187N, Witching Hour PLI-Dek Systems, Inc. Hickory Eagle, Fawn Gray Flashed #5582 Eldorado Stone, Solano Camino Adobe Frazee Paint, CLW 1006W, Ensign Frazee Paint, CL 2674M, Storm Bay Frazee Paint, CL 2656N, Bittersweet Frazee Paint, CLC 1288, Bulls Eye Thurma Tru Doors, American Style Collection #CCA260 With Four Block Dentil Shelf Frazee Paint, CLW 1013W Akamina PLI-Dek Systems, Inc. Hickory Eagle, Fawn Gray Flashed Eldorado Stone, Solano Camino Adobe Frazee Paint, CLW 1006W, Ensign Frazee Paint, CL 2674M, Storm Bay Frazee Paint, CL 2656N, Bittersweet Frazee Paint, CLC 1288, Bulls Eye Frazee Paint CLW 1013W Akamina PL-13. Trash enclosures with solid roof covers shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL-14. For the multi -family component of the project, parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross -lot access and parking across all lots. PL-15. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Planning Director. PL-16. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL-17. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. PL-18. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL-19. Construction of the landscaped area along Pechanga Parkway north of the project site shall commence pursuant to a preconstruction meeting with the developer, Temecula Community Services District Maintenance Superintendent, Building and Safety Inspector and Public Works Inspector. Developer shall comply with City and Temecula Community Services District review and inspections processes. PL-20. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, or HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped area along Pechanga Parkway north of the project site from western property boundary to the southern property corner of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 11984 and the area identified as lot 53 of Tentative Tract No. 36415. PL-21. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by the developer. PL-22. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL-23. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL-24. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL-25. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL-26. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL-27. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. PL-28. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. PL-29. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. PL-30. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. PL-31. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. PL-32. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. PL-33. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on -site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on -site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL-34. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. PL-35. The City currently owns parcel 961-450-003 located at the north of the project site. The applicant must provide an analysis of the costs associated with the landscape improvements north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway, and at the developer's expense, provide an appraisal for parcel 961-450-003 and submit a deposit for the City's cost of legal review of the document in order for the City to consider a purchase and sales agreement for relinquishing ownership. PL-36 A County geologic study (GEO) shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the County Geologist. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL-37. The following must be completed prior to issuance of building permits for the first multi- family dwelling unit to ensure the construction of the 49 age restricted single-family units: a. Record Final Map to include all grading and infrastructure plans of both communities. b. Grading, utility, and main road work for both communities shall be done in one phase, or in two phases with the age restricted single-family community done first. c. Single Family Private Street A will be completed and all of the 49 age restricted single-family pads shall be graded to finish elevation. d. All infrastructure for utilities for all of the 49 age restricted single family lots shall be installed. e. Perimeter fencing, entry gate, and monument walls for the 49 single-family age restricted lots shall be installed. f. The applicant shall pursue and obtain building permits for at least 16 of the age restricted single-family dwelling units, or the applicant may post securities as approved by the Planning Director for all of the 49 age restricted single-family dwelling units. PL-38 The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL-39. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL-40. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL-41. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verity that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL-42. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL-43. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL-44. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL-45. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verity that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL-46. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL-47. Roof -mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. PL-48. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL-49. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL-50. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL-51. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL-52. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs first, the developer shall complete the Public Works application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan, and pay the advanced energy fees. PL-53. The landscape construction drawings for the landscaped area north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works. PL-54. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to install and maintain the landscaped area north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway. PL-55 The condo units shall incorporate upgraded interior fixtures. A Home Product Review application to review interior fixtures shall be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the release of building permits. (Added at the October 2, 2013 Planning Commission Public Hearing) Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL-55. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL-56. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL-57. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL-58. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL-59. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the occupancy permit. PL-60. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL-61. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL-62. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." PL-63. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL-64. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL-65. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PL-66. The landscaped area north of the project site along Pechanga Parkway shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL-67. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 15, 2011, a copy of which is attached. PL-68. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated May 14, 2012, a copy of which is attached. PL-69. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated May 2, 2012, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed and submitted to Building and Safety. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. B-2. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-3. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2010 California Energy Codes, 2010 California Green building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, City of Temecula Municipal Code. B-4. Multifamily residential and parking shall comply with Chapter 11A of the 2010 CBC. The applicant shall indicate the parking type (assigned or unassigned) at plan submittal. B-5. The applicant shall provide 10% voluntary measures on the project, as stipulated by the 2010 California Green Building Code. B-6. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B-7. All ground floor units to be adaptable. B-8. Provide disabled access from the public right-of-way to the main entrance of the building. B-9. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B-10. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B-11. Show path of travel from public right way to all public areas on site (club house, trash enclosures, tot lots, and picnic areas). B-12. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way. B-13. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-14. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-15. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-16. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one -quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B-17. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. B-18. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. B-19. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal B-20. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B-21. Provide a Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2010 edition of the California Building Code. B-22. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B-23. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-24. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-25. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by Fire Prevention. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. Fire Prevention required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for multi -family areas and 1,500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for the single family dwelling area. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-3. Fire Prevention is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on -site and offsite 6" x 4" x 2-2'/2" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-4. Maximum cul-de-sac- length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-5. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-6. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-7. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-8. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by Fire Prevention (CFC Chapter 5). F-9. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-10. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to Fire Prevention for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5). F-11. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to Fire Prevention for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F-12. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to Fire Prevention for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to Fire Prevention. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-13. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-14. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Multi -family residential buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers. Single-family residences and multi -family residential units shall have 4-inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by Fire Prevention (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-15. A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. F-16. A Knox -Box shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). F-17. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). F-18. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD-1. Applicant shall ensure any landscaping surrounding buildings is kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to prevent would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD-2. Applicant shall ensure any trees surrounding building rooftops be kept at a distance to prevent roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. PD-3. Any berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD-4. Applicant must comply with the standards of title 24 part 6 of the California code of regulations, for residential standards, refer to publication CEC-400-2008-016-CMF- REV-I. PD-5. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant lightfixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD-6. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be vandal resistant, wall mounted light fixtures. PD-7. All exterior doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD-8. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. PD-9. Any roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PD-10. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well - lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD-11. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD-12. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD-13. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506-5132. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed bythe developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW-2. A Grading Permit for rough and/or precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City -maintained street right-of-way. PW-3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW-4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW-5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non -permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm water conveyance system or receiving water during all field activities. PW-6. An updated version of the conceptually -accepted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be submitted to the Department of Public Works as part of the initial grading plan submittal package. PW-7. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the accepted WQMP. PW-8. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. PW-9. The vehicular movement for the proposed southerly driveway on Loma Linda Road is restricted to right in/right out only. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW-10. Prior to any grading permit, the Developer shall record a Grant of Easement which converts the existing drainage easement located along Lots 35 to 52 of Tract Map No. 21067 to an easement for drainage and trail purposes consistent with the Development Plan for Bella Linda. In the event the Developer is not able to record the easement for each affected property, the Developer shall submit a new Development Plan. PW-11. The Developer shall process the required documents to affect the proposed sale of Lot 87 of Tract Map No. 21067 (APN 961-450-003) from the City to the Developer, including costs of the appraisal and staff/legal review. PW-12. The Developer shall provide a drainage easement at the southwest corner of the property to accommodate four 10' x 7' reinforced concrete box storm drain facility as shown on the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Project No. PW99-11. PW-13. The WQMP must receive final acceptance by the Department of Public Works. PW-14. The project shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement that must include the owner's notarized signature, proof of recordation with the County Recorder's Office, and all maintenance procedures for each of the structural treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the WQMP. PW-15. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW-16. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with the Construction, Grading and Encroachment Ordinance Section 18.24.140. PW-17. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW-18. The Geologic Study shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the County Geologist PW-19. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities to mitigate the 100-year storm event from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off site or on -site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. PW-20. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. PW-21. The Developer shall obtain and submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW-22. Construction -phase pollution prevention shall be consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 18.15 and associated technical manual and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW-23. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the project's Risk Level (RL) determination number, and name, contact information, and certification number of the Qualified SW PPP Developer (QSD). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW-24. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. California Department of Fish and Wildlife b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District PW-25. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW-26. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. PW-27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. PW-28. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW-29. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map No. 36415 shall be approved and recorded. PW-30. The Developer shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). PW-31. Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 207A. b. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 800. c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number. 400. d. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. PW-32. The developer shall design of the following public improvements outlined in these conditions to the City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. a. Pechanga Parkway from Loma Linda Road to the western property boundary (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of sidewalk, parkway improvements and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), b. Pechanga Parkway from the western property boundary to the southern property corner of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 11984 (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, parkway improvements and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), c. Loma Linda Road (Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) Highway Standard No. 102-88' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). d. Temecula Lane (General Local Street Standard No. 104-60' R/W) to include dedication of half -width street right-of-way, installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW-33. The Developer shall design the following private streets to meet City public road standard. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Street "A" (Private Street - 55' R/E) to include installation of full -width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Development Plan. PW-34. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PW-35. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW-36. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. PW-37. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW-38. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer shall pay its fair share contribution for offsite improvements as identified in the Project's Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 2012 (Section H of the EIR). PW-39. The project shall demonstrate that all of the structural water quality facilities outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW-40. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW-41. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-42. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-43. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. Z�& CGjNTY OF RIVERSIDE • COMi•�JNITY HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH November 15, 2011 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Eric Jones P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: PA11-0275 — BELLA LINDA DP (APN#961-450-012,013,003) Dear Mr. Jones: In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project referenced in the subject heading of this letter: POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE This project is proposing Rancho California Water District (RCWD) potable water service and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) sanitary sewer service. Please note that it is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with the appropriate water and sewer purveyor, as well as, all other applicable agencies. FOR ANY PROPOSED PUBLIC OR SEMI-PUBLIC SWIMMING POOL/SPA A set of three (3) complete plans for the swimming pool/spa must be submitted to DEH to verify compliance with the California Administrative Code, the California Health and Safety Code, and the Uniform Plumbing Code. Public or Semi-public Swimming Pool/Spa plans should be submitted to: • Department of Environmental Health, District Environmental Services, Murrieta 38740 Sky Canyon Drive. Suite A, Murrieta CA 92563 Attention: Plan Check (951) 461-0284. Plan Check fees are required. Local Entomement Agency . PO. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 • (909) 955-8982 • FAX (909) 781-9653 • 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 9 _I I I__ __s ,u_.__ . DO, Rw 19nr; a;,,o.rido CA 92502-1206 • (9091 955-8980 • FAX (909) 955-8903 • 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Eric Jones City of Temecula November 15, 2011 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HMMB): The facility will require a business emergency plan for the storage of any hazardous materials, including swimming pool/spa chemicals, greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional environmental health issues, HMMB reserves the right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please contact HMMB at (951) 766-6524 to obtain information regarding any additional requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PHASE I STUDY: An Environmental Assessment (EA) Phase I study will be required prior to Planning Department approval of this project. Please submit an EA Phase I study and applicable review fees to DEH Environmental Cleanups Program (ECP). For further information, please contact ECP at (951) 955-8982. Phase I Environmental Assessment — The intent of a Phase I Assessment is to determine if any chemicals or pesticides were used on the property, the location of use, and any possible lingering negative effects. This condition requires the applicant to compile sufficient information about the property and land uses to aid the Department in making a determination of whether additional investigation is needed. If concerns are identified in this report, a Phase II Assessment would be required. RETENTION BASINS — NO VECTORS: All proposed retention basins must be constructed and maintained in a manner that prevents vector breeding and vector nuisances. If you have any questions regarding this Jetter please contact me at (951) 955-8980. SPichaellyMistica, MBA, REHS Environmental Protection and Oversight Division Land Use and Water Resources Program Board of Directors President and Treasurer Joseph J. Kuebler, CPA Vice President Philip E. Paule Ronald W. Sullivan Randy A. Record David J. Slawson General Manager Paul D. Jones 11, P.E. Director of The Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif. Randy A. Record Board Secretary and Assistant to the General Manager Rosemarie V. Howard EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SINCE 1950 May 14, 2012 Eric Jones City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Bella Linda Development Plan (PA11-0275), General Plan Amendment, Zone change/Planned Development Overlay (PA11-0276, Tentative Tract Map (PA11-0277) Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report Dear Mr. Jones: Legal Counsel Thank you for the opportunity to review the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Redwine and Sherrill above referenced project. The proposed project will require the approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Professional Office (PO) to High Density (H) residential, a Zone Change from Professional Office (PO) to Planned Development Overlay zoning (to establish development criteria), a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the property into fifty-seven lots, and a Development Plan. The project is a two-phase residential development. Phase one will consist of 325 apartment units totaling 462,622 square feet. Phase two of the project will consist of creating lots for 49 senior single-family units. The project will feature meandering trail along Loma Linda Road and Pechanga Parkway, and bio-swale. An additional 0.91 acres of project area is located off -site immediately to the north of the project site. The subject project requires sewer service from EMWD. At this time, based on current project information, EMWD can accommodate service to this proposed development by directing sewer discharge to at least two nearby collection systems. The details of said service connection points will be further detailed in a separate document, known as EMWD's Plan Of Service, which is currently in process. Mailing Address: Post Office Box 8300 Perris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (951) 928-3777 Fax: (951) 928-6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet: www.emwd.ora City of Temecula May 14, 2012 Page 2 Again, EMWD appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please forward the Draft Environmental Impact Report to the attention of Helen Stratton at the mailing address shown on page one. If you have questions concerning these comments, please feel free to contact Helen Stratton at 951 928-3777, Ext. 4545, or Eli Rodriguez at Ext. 4450. Sincerely, Joseph B. Lewis Director of Engineering Services JBL:kah cc: E. Rodriguez May 2, 2012 Eric Jones Y a 3 Wad, City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Post Office Box 9033 ~� ` Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Board of Directors John E. Hoagland SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY President BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; Ben R. Drake Sr. Vice Pmsidrnt DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PA11-0276; TENTATIVE Stephen J. Corona TRACT MAP NO. PA11-0277, DEVELOPMENT PLAN Lisa D. Herman PA11-0275; APNS 961-450-012 AND 961-450-013 William E. Plummer [ESA (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT)] Roland C. Skumawitz James "Stew" Stew -art Dear Eric: Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within Officers the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD/District). Matthew G. stone General Manager The subject project/property fronts an existing 24-inch diameter water pipeline Richard S. Williamson. P.E. (1305 Pressure Zone) within Pechanga Parkway, an existing 16-inch diameter Assistant General Manager Assists water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Loma Linda Road, and an 8-inch Armstrong JeffreChief Financial Clfficer/Treasurer water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Temecula Lane. The subject N. Craig Elitharp. P.E. project/property also fronts an existing 16-inch diameter recycled water Maintenan�gerations& pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone) within Pechanga Parkway and an existing 8- Perry R. Louck inch diameter recycled water pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone) within Loma Director of Plannin„ Linda Road. Andrew L. Webster. P.E. Chief' Ewineer Belli E. Garcia Water service to the subject project/property exists (under Account Nos. 01- DistrictSecretar 08-17500-7 and 01-08-16800-6) under Vacant Long -Term service. Additions Best Bestmes B. a''Kr ever LLP or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and General Counsi.d Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water meters for landscape irrigation, as applicable. Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project/property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment, as determined by the Lead Agency. Rancho California Water District e Bo:; 9U77 , Temecula. California 92089-9017 296-6860 Eric Jones/City of Temecuia May 2, 2012 Paze Two In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5, the project/property will be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, which should be noted as a condition for any subsequent development plans. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on -site and/or off -site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water Resources Control Board and/or the basin plan objectives and the permit conditions issued by the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at the District office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT l� �14 Jake Wiley, P.E. Associate Engineer cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager -Design Warren Back, Engineering Manager -Planning Heath McMahon, Construction Contracts Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor 01 12 JW:habOITF450TEG Rancho California Water District .i r . ul V =i Uflr [;cs 90] Temecula. California 92�49-9017 (9511 '296-6900 I A_X (9a1) 396-6860 www.ranchowacer.com PC RESOLUTION NO. 13-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0276, A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO REVISE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY 13 (PDO-13) ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age - restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 public hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 at a continued public hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. The applicant then chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. G. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on October 2, 2013 at a duly noticed public hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending the approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zone Change Planning Application No. PA11-0276 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation for the property. Planned Development Overlay-13 will establish the design and development framework for the project. As proposed and conditioned, the project design will be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Zone Change Application, PA11-0276: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Zone Change Application, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was prepared. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, City staff prepared an (EIR) analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Zone Change and associated applications ("the Project'), as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through. March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the October 2, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13-39 recommending that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Project. Section 4. Recommendations. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Planning Application No. PA11- 0276, a Zone Change to change the zoning from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay-13 (PDO-13) and to add Sections 17.22.240 through 17.22.254 of PDO-13 to the Temecula Municipal Code to create zoning and residential development standards in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 2"d day of October, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary -TSEALj =� STATE OF C4iFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13-36 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of October, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Harter, Kight NOES: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Telesio ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Guerriero ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO. 13-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0277, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 57 LOTS FROM THREE EXISTING PARCELS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (APN 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 at a continued public hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA12-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring Program and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. The applicant then chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. G. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on October 2, 2013 at a duly noticed public hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that Tentative Tract Map Application PA11-0277 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; As designed and conditioned, the proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Temecula General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; The proposed map does not impact land designated for conservation or agricultural use. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The proposed map subdivides 22.73 acres to allow for 270 condominium units and 49 lots for age restricted single-family homes. The proposed Tentative Tract Map design is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and the development standards for the Planned Development Overlay 13 zoning designation. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on vacant property. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the project. As conditioned, the subdivision is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with Fire and Building Codes and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. A Statement of Overriding Consideration has been provided in order to account for temporary construction noises. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities to the extent feasible. All development must meet all appropriate Building and Fire Code requires as they relate to passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided; All acquired rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act); The project involves the construction of multi -family and single-family residential units. The project has been conditioned to ensure the City's parkland dedication requirements are met. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Tract Map Application, PA11-0277: A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map Application ("the Project"), as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was prepared. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the Project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the EIR for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, City staff prepared an EIR analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map and associated applications, as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the October 2, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13-39 recommending that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map to create 57 lots from three existing parcels totaling 22.73 acres, generally located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 2nd day of October, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [S-EEAL] STATE OF CALIF-ORNIA ) COUNTY OF-REVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13-37 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of October, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Harter, Kight NOES: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Telesio ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Guerriero ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO. 13-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11-0275, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ON A 22.73 ACRE SITE CONSISTING OF A 270 CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES AND 49 AGE RESTRICTED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age - restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the public hearing for the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 public hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 at a continued public hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA12-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. The applicant then chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. G. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on October 2, 2013 at a duly noticed public hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA12-0275, a Development Plan, with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan Application PA11-0275 pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.05.10.F, is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application, PA11-0275: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan Application ("the Project"), as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was required. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, City staff prepared an EIR analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan and associated applications, as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and Incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the October 2, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 13-39 recommending that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of overriding consideration for the Project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA11-0275, a Development Plan to construct a residential project on a 22.73 acre site consisting of a 270 apartment unit complex and associated amenities and 49 age restricted single-family units on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 2nd day of October, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATL'--OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY..(?'F RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13-38 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2"d day of October, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Harter, Kight NOES: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Telesio ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Guerriero ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO. 13-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE BELLA LINDA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 22.73 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PECHANGA PARKWAY AND LOMA LINDA ROAD" (PA11-0275, PA11-0276, PA11-0277) (APNS 961-450-012, 961-450-013, AND 961-450-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 27, 2011, Larry Markham, on behalf of Coyne Development, filed Planning Application No. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11-0275, a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2013, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. At the Commission's request, the item was continued to the April 3, 2013 meeting to allow the applicant to address the construction schedule for age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. D. At the Commission's request, the project was continued at the April 3, 2013 hearing to the April 17, 2013 hearing to again address issues related to the construction schedule for the age -restricted, single-family housing, multi -family density, and architectural enhancements. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 17, 2013 and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny Planning Application Nos. PA11- 0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA12-0275 a Development Plan, based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. The applicant then chose to revise and resubmit the project for further review based on the concerns raised at the public hearings. G. The Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting on October 2, 2013, considered the Project and environmental review at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Draft EIR. H. Prior to taking action, the Planning Commission has heard, been presented with, reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, and all oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. The recommendation to the City Council as set forth in this resolution, and findings contained herein reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and are deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Project and related actions. I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommendation for approval of Planning Application Nos. PA11-0276, a Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay; PA11-0277, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA11- 0275, a Development Plan, (the `Project"). A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan Application ("the Project"), as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and an EIR was required. B. On April 12, 2012, a Notice of Preparation was released to all agencies and persons that might be affected by the project. C. On April 30, 2012, a scoping session was held at which time City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, City staff prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzing the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Development Plan and associated applications, as described in the EIR. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared. E. Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from December 3, 2012 through February 19, 2013. A Notice of Completion was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of January 20, 2013 through March 6, 2013. Copies of the documents have been available to public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. F. Seven written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and Incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. The Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and corresponding Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations and all comments received regarding these documents prior to and at the March 20, 2013 public hearing and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with regard to temporary construction noise; and (3) the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Section 3. Recommendation to City Council. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, and approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for this project set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 2nd day of October, 2013. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAS.] STATE OF CA M- RNIA ) COUNTY OF RWE�RSIDE )ss CITY OF tEME;eULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 13-39 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2"d day of October, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Harter, Kight NOES: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Telesio ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Guerriero ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None 1,c2 Patrick Richardson, Secretary COUNCIL BUSINESS Item No. 7 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director �p City Manager (sJ? CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Selection and Appointment of Local Task Force Members to the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety PREPARED BY: Yvette Martinez, Inclusion Services Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council each appoint two Local Task Force Members to the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety; and 2. All members of the Committee must be City of Temecula residents. BACKGROUND: With prevalent social issues facing families throughout the country and in our region, specifically in light of developments in technology that pose new social complications, twenty-four elected City and School District leaders from eight Cities across Southwest Riverside County joined together at the request of Temecula Mayor Naggar and Murrieta Mayor Gibbs to form the Regional Family, Youth and Health Task Force. This Regional Task Force is committed to providing our youth, parents and families' information and resources to better understand and cope with modern influences. Today's youth, especially teens, face a wide variety of social issues which affect their physical and emotional well-being. The Regional Task Force has held public forums with professional speakers to provide awareness and help families within our collective communities deal with topics such as internet and video gaming addictions, family violence, social media bullying, human/child trafficking, and cyber safety. On August 27, 2013, the City Council approved forming a Local Task Force (City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety or CCAC-HFS) as an extension of the Regional Family, Youth and Health Task Force to serve as a grass -roots advisory committee specific to the City of Temecula. The CCAC-HFS will be comprised of community members appointed by the City Council, and empowered to create and develop local initiatives within the City of Temecula to battle the growing concerns of dangerous teen social issues. The vision of the local City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety will be to engage its Local Task Force Members in a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. These local efforts are set forth by both the City's Quality of Life Master Plan, which aspires for a City that "allows each resident to live to their fullest and most satisfying potential", and the Temecula Youth Master Plan, which includes a very powerful statement, "Temecula's youth are valued as the future of our community... and it is important that we develop our youth through a well-balanced approach that fosters intellectual, social, spiritual, creative, physical, and emotional growth." Staff conducted public outreach to the community through various media outlets including Temecula Outreach TV, Press Release, City of Temecula Website, and Social Media to solicit applicants to apply to be a Local Task Force Member on the CCAC-HFS, and received 21 applications. As outlined in the CCAC-HFS framework, each member of the Local Task Force will serve a one-year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Upon City Council appointment of Local Task Force members, within 45 days City staff will provide necessary resources to coordinate meetings, workshops and serve as a liaison between Local Task Force, Regional Task Force, City Council, and the community. All meetings of the Local Task Force will be public meetings subject to the Brown Act. FISCAL IMPACT: The City staffing costs in the amount of $2,996 required to assist the Local Task Force can be absorbed in the FY 2013-14 Community Services operational budget. It is anticipated that no other costs will be incurred as a result of Local Task Force. ATTACHMENTS: 1. CCAC-HFS Local Task Force Member Applications 2. Application Matrix 3. CCAS-HFS Framework 0Q-13-13 ���C'7 RC`� tf. 3'0' �Wt' City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Fa,,m#�ily Safety is ohta nrec& rom hae Region �uu am y anc�ea��aske v cleyain�c create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and eenerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. ' Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Rebecca Andrews Residential Address: Temecula CA 92592 Business Address: Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I am currently a stay at home mom, with a Finance/Accounting background, that has recently moved to the area and would love to get involved with my community. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? Befom aad after becoming a parept I have bad a 12aa2ion for making a-dif ference on the youth io my ca[ munity. In my previous community I was involved in Big Brothers Big Sisters, as a Big Sister, as well as a member of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Young Professionals Committee. I believe in programs such as this one -because I have seen first handa ey worK ana do ma e a differLsnce. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? As a member of Big Brothers and Sister Young Professionals Committee I am familiar with being a part of a sub group that takes ideas and plans from the main overlaying cause and implements them into the community. I have seen what works_ with BBBS and would like to bring some of those ideas to the table. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? 5-10 hours a week Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ CivicNolunteer Groups_ '®Ton -Profit Agencies x Youth Serving Organizations x Other - Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 "Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety Planning Framework Introduction The Crisis Today, teens face a wide variety of social issues which affect their physical and emotional well- being. The stresses and challenges our teens are facing have made them more vulnerable and susceptible to destructive and dangerous behaviors. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports the following statistics amongst our youth: • 21.9% of students had had five or more drinks of alcohol in a row (i.e., within a couple of hours) on at least 1 day during the 30 days before the survey (i.e., binge drinking) • 47.4% of students had had sexual intercourse • 15.8% of students had seriously considered attempting suicide • 16.2% of students had been electronically bullied, including being bullied through e-mail, chat rooms, instant messaging, web sites, or texting • 32.8% of students had been in a physical fight one or more times With these alarming statistics, communities must act to address these issues not only regionally but locally within their own communities. According to the City of Temecula Youth Master Plan — Environmental Scan Summary, the challenges and major concerns specifically affecting Temecula's youth are drugs and alcohol, peer pressure, public safety, difficult relationships, lack of things to do and shortage in transportation options to stay active in extracurricular activities. Background The Temecula Youth Master Plan (2008) states, "Temecula's youth are valued as the future of our community. We provide an exciting, positive and supportive environment with a wide range of choices and opportunities that challenge our youth with new experiences. We develop our youth through a well-balanced approach that fosters intellectual, social, spiritual, creative, physical, and emotional growth. Our young people enjoy their youth, and achieve lifelong success as Temecula's adults of tomorrow." With prevalent social issues facing families throughout the country and in our region, specifically in light of developments in technology that pose new social complications, elected City and School District leaders across Southwest Riverside County have formed the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force (Regional Task Force) committed to providing our youth, parents and families information and resources to better understand and cope with modern influences. The Regional Task Force is a joint collaboration between City of Temecula, Mayor Naggar and City of Murrieta, Mayor Gibbs. Vision The Regional Task Force shaped a vision that will launch a localized task force, City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety (CCAC-HFS or Local Task Force) which will serve as an action committee to create and develop initiatives that will address issues facing our youth. The Local Task Force will empower members to actively find ways to battle the growing concerns of dangerous teen social issues. The vision of the local City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety will engage its task force members in a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. i ssio The City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety will take issues, ideas, and programs discussed at the Regional Family, Youth and Health Task Force and disseminate it at a local level amongst Temecula residents. The Local Task Force will serve as a model to other communities/municipalities. This will allow members of the task force an opportunity to zero in on the areas that require the most or immediate attention while still addressing other concerns. Process and Activities (a). Develop the framework of the Local Task Force (b). Bring the item to City Council for approval and comments (c). Solicit for Local Task Force members and Receive Applications (d). City Council Appointment of Local Task Force yes k.W a",t..eiPlanning Process Members. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. The appointed grass -roots members will not be elected officials. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. Number Duties Term of Appointment. (a). The affairs and decisions of the City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety shall be managed by the Local Task Force and City Council. (b). City of Temecula shall provide staffing resources to coordinate meetings, workshops and serve as a liaison between Local Task Force, City Council, and the community at -large. (c). Applicants will be selected based upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate, experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. The Local Task Force may be composed of members from diverse categories including but not limited to those listed below: 1. TVUSD high school students from each high school, appointed by school officials or City Human Services Division 2. Citizens at -large who are parents, appointed by City Council 3. Senior citizens or retired from a youth serving organization, appointed by City Council 4. Civic and/or volunteers from nonprofit organizations, appointed by City Council 5. Members of an organized neighborhood watch or similar program, appointed by City Council & Local PTA members, appointed by City Council 7. Youth members of local private/public organizations, appointed by City Council 8. Members of local faith -based organizations, appointed by City Council 9. Members of TVUSD including but not limited to a School Resource Officer, appointed by City Council 10. Members of TVUSD who are counselors or teachers, appointed by City Council (d). The Local Task Force will meet to discuss and find ways to address local social issues as outlined in the framework of the strategic directions. Members will be appointed different roles which may be to study issues, others to bring suggestions/ideas/comments to regional task force, others to take immediate and direct action (setting up interventions, workshops, etc). (e). Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Meetings of the Task Force. Members of the Local Task Force are required to attend Local Task Force meetings which would be held at a City facility. Members of the Local Task Force should attend the Regional Task Force meetings to take information back to the local meetings. All meetings of the Local Task Force will be public meetings subject to the Brown Act. -Strategies and Actions Strategies were identified to achieve the goals and outcomes of the Regional Youth, Family, and Health Task Force. These set of strategies are also outlined in the Temecula Youth Master Plan. The following are the recommended strategies for action to be performed by Local Task Force members. 1. Community Education and Awareness — members of the task force will educate and inform the community about important issues as they relate to youth and families. 2. Create Organized Programs, Activities, and Services — provide, facilitate, collaborate and partner to encourage programs, activities, and services to better engage youth. 3. Build new and expand existing partnerships — partnerships among public and private sector organizations to leverage resources, leverage funds and bridge gaps in services. .. ` City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Farce and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating at safer and healthier community for our vouth and Qenerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report for as needed or requested) to the City Council. .Name. Residential Address Business Address: Phone: F)?E,p /-3,9/.? T2 7_,Frn ,,�F c61z19 / 119 Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Farce Committee? E"r T6�" 47�1gew 1 Awl re - C14/vl e e�f 01f ieZ_S What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? PRE 16 /46 YOU 79S RAIV /V�ZFV How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? A,041r*4�,07 Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen X College Student High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch k Civic/Volunteer Groups-X Non -Profit Agencies Youth Serving Organizations Other HO R S OR RD P/QFS)QeA17'1 N EMBE1P T-S1,1ECY4,4 Please submit applications to Yvette.iVartinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 9.2590 "Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-64K YyuM City of Temecula., City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and eenerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Rachel Budd Residential Address: Temecula, CA 92591 Business Address: n/a Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I would like to make a difference in the lives of the City of Temecula's youth. I am committed to many of the goals of the Action Committee on different levels and would like to contribute at the City level. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? I am a Temecula teenager, President of SADD (Students Against Destructive Decisions), Vice President of Chaparral High Schools one often National Teen Irillieners. for of ers 1111gainst Drunk Driving),and Presidentof Peer Leaders. I have interned at the District Attorney's Office and have seen first hand what can happen to our local youth. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? As a teen I can help develop and implement policies to ensure the health of Temecula youth. I will bring a unique point of view given the various groups I belong to. I think being a member would be mutually beneficial to Chaparral High School, SADD, MADD, and the City as far as information sharing is concerned. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? I can commit to 3 hours each week Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student x Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ Civic/Volunteer Groups — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Other Please submit (applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL 27215 Nicolas Road Temecula, Catifomia 92591 (951) 695-4200 Fax (951) 6954219 September 27, 2013 Distinguished members of the Temecula City Council: I am writing in support of Miss Rachel Budd's application to represent Chaparral High School as the student representative on the Action Committee for Health and Family Safety. I'm struck by the shine that Rachel Budd radiates. More than anyone else at Chaparral High School now or in recent past, Rachel epitomizes the best of what a high school student can offer. a complex thinker and problem solver, a serious student with large goals and dreams, a young woman with a compassionate and genuinely caring nature, upbeat energy, motivation and drive. There is more. Because her myriad of interests shoot off in every direction and her plans for the future would Fill up ten people's fives from birth to one hundred, Rachel delves deeply into many subjects and areas to learn and grow. Intuition tells me that Rachel will create something unique and special one day. Her answers and approaches are distinctive. She has an entrepreneurial spirit, tireless drive, and amazing endurance that will inevitably lead her towards making a name for herself in some yet to be discovered way. Rachel is the one student who, in the last four years, has made the biggest positive impact on our campus. As the current Associated Student Body Vice President, Rachel commands the respect and authority of the students and staff for her accomplishments and hard work while being a caring friend and genuinely engaging and fun -to -be - with teenager. As a Peer leader on campus, Rachel has been the go -to leader of this important program which staff and administration utilizes widely for peer tutoring, one -day forums where students discuss emotionally charged issues on campus of concern. and Freshmen Orientation. For her efforts in clubs and organizations. Rachel is a ubiquitous Face and voice of action and cNuige for the better in our school and community. In a graceful tightrope walk between her vastly different roles at CHS. Rachel, the student, Vice President, Peer Leader, Captain, tutor, and friend, manages all these with ease. With a blend ofefl•icicnt leadership, genuine compassion, excellent people skills,. and easy likeability, Rachel can accomplish so much with so little time. As a master of time management. Rachel has always balanced a rigorous academic schedule with extracurricular activities and active home life. She loves school for the pure joy of learning and often digs further into subjects of interest than teachers dictate through classroom curriculum. l am confident long after Rachel has graduated and moved on, her mark on Chaparral High will still indelibly remain. I believe that her fire is internal and steadfast. She has always been, and will always be, motivated intrinsically to serve others. And just maybe, that's her shine. For all the above reasons, I sincerely and firmly assert that Rachel is the number one candidate from Chaparral High School to be appointed as the student representative to the Action Committee for Health and Family Safety. Sincerely. Gii & 1*;�, Chaparral High School Principal n yrr City of Temecula �- City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Raymond Cameron, MFT Residential Address: Temecula CA 92592 Murieta CA 92562 -- CORRECTED AND CONFIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Business Address: Temecula CA 92592 PLEASE USE ONLY THIS ADDRESS FOR COORESPONDENCE AND PUBLICATION Phone:�� Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? As a local health care professional, I am continually looking for opportunity to serve the children and families in the Temecula Valley. My goal to provide guidance and support to the Health & Family Safety Task Force in any capacity determined necesary or need by the Task Force. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? As a Licensed Mental Health Professional, I have been assiosting and supporting the children and families in the Temecula Valley since 2001. My clinical expereinces have been working with teens and families regarding alcohol & drug use, abuse / violence, and safety issues in a variety of treatment modalities incluidng outpatent clinical setting as well as residential treatment centers. (Please see attached CV) What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? Assist and support the task force and children & families in the community regarding alcohol & drug use, abuse / violence, and safety issues How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? dependent on needs of the Task Force Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ Civic/Volunteer Groups — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Other Local Health Care Professional Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Raymond F. Cameron, M.A., Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist Inc. California State AFT License: MFC 36236 Address: = emecula, CA 92592 Tei hone'v�� Fax E-mail. Website:mmmmmmmmmm LICENSE Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), State of California License Number: MFC 38236 CLINICAL EMPLOYMENT 10/07 — Present Raymond Cameron, M.A., MFT, line. ■ Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist #Temecula, CA. 92591. Tetcphonej - Fax' 5/02 — 9/07 Novell & Novell Counseling Services, Inc. ■ Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist Independent Contractor 29748 Rancho California Road, Temecula, CA. 92591. 951-694-0695. Ben Novell, MFT, Administrator. ■ Group Facilitator, Domestic Violence Rehabilitation Program 29748 Rancho California Road, Temecula, CA. 92591.951-694-0695. Ben Novell, MFT, Administrator. 5/02 — 2/04 Oak Grove Institute ■ Clinical Therapist & Case Manager 24275 Jefferson Avenue, Murrieta, CA. 92562.951-677-5599. Tamara Wilson, MFT, Program Director. 8/01 — 5/02 Riverside County Department of Mental Health ■ Clinical Therapist If, Continuing Community Care -Central 1695 Spruce Street Riverside, California 92507.951-358-4801. John Behney, LCSW, Regional Manager. 7/99 — 8/01 San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency ■ Case Management Clinician, San Diego County Mental Health 1250 Moreno Blvd San Diego, California 92110.619-692-8715 Richard Ramsey MFT, Program Manager. ■ Protective Services Worker I, Children Services Bureau, Family Violence Project 1700 Pacific Highway San Diego, California 92101-2489.619-685-2446 Genevieve Bromley, MSW, Program Manager, Policy & Program Support. 11/96 — 6/01 The Institute for Counseling ■ Marriage and Family Therapist Intern 2725 Congress Street, Suite 2C, San Diego, California 92110.619-688-1035 Michele Koonin, LCSW, Owner & Clinical Supervisor. ■ Group Facilitator, Domestic Violence Rehabilitation Program 2725 Congress Street, Suite 2C, San Diego, California 92110.619-688-1035 Michele Koonin, LCSW, Owner & Clinical Supervisor. 7/98 — 9/99 Phoenix House • Marriage and Family Therapist Intern, Adolescent Outpatient & Residential Programs 345 Saxony Road, Suite 105, Encinitas, California 92024.760-634-7610 Cheryl Davis-Plotts, Psy.D., MFT Clinical Supervisor, Sarah Warner, Program Manager. 10/97 —1/99 Psychiatric Management Resources / Scripps Outpatient Behavioral Health ■ Per Diem Clinical Therapist, Partial Hospitalization and Outpatient Care Programs San Diego and Santee, California No known contact available at this time. Page 1 of 4 Raymond Cameron, MFT Curriculum Vitae, continued Page: 2 of 4 6/95 — 6/97 Episcopal Community Services ■ Marriage and Family Therapist Intern 3585 Fifth Avenue, Suite A, San Diego, California 92103. 619-688-2440 (AAMFT Supervision) Sally Le Boy, MFT, Sally Rose, MFT, & Dan Carr, MFT Clinical Supervisors, Mary Edwards Program Manager. ■ Psychiatric Case Manager, Downtown Safe Havens 3585 Fifth Avenue, Suite A, San Diego, California 92103.619-688-2440 (AAMFT Supervision) Dan Carr, MFT Clinical Supervisor, Mary Edwards Program Manager. ■ Group Facilitator, Domestic Violence Rehabilitation Program 3585 Fifth Avenue, Suite A, San Diego, California 92103. 619-688-2440 (AAMFT Supervision) Dan Carr, MFT Clinical Supervisor, Mary Edwards Program Manager. ■ Group Facilitator, High Risk Adolescent Group for Charter Schools of San Diego 3585 Fifth Avenue, Suite A, San Diego, California 92103. 619-688-2440. (AAMFT Supervision) Sally Rose, MFT, Mary Edwards Program Manager. 2/97 — 5/97 YWCA of San Diego ■ Group Facilitator, Domestic Violence Rehabilitation Program County of San Diego Juvenile Hall Domestic Violence Program 2550 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, California 92109-3818 No known contact available. EDUCATION 2011 Problem Gambling Training (30 hours), California Problem Gambling Treatment Services Program, California office of Problem Gambling & UCLA Gambling Studies Program San Diego, CA 2008 Clinical Supervisor Training (30 hours), American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Alliant University, Irvine, CA. 1996 Master of Arts in Marriage and Family Therapy. University of San Diego (Accredited by the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy) 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110-2492 1994 Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy, Cum Laude University of California at San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 RESEARCH EXPERIENCE 6/96 — 7/97 Institute Researcher, YWCA Domestic Violence Research and Training Institute 2550 Garnet Avenue, San Diego, California 92109-3818.619-581-1774 9/94 — 6/96 Research Assistant to Richard Bischoff, Ph.D. University of San Diego, School of Education, Graduate Marriage & Family Therapy Program 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110-2492 9/93 — 6/94 Research Assistant to Laraine McDonough, Ph.D. University of California at San Diego, Department of Cognitive Science 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 1/93 — 4/93 Research Assistant in laboratory of Michael Cole, Ph.D. University of California at San Diego, Department of Communications 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 TRAINER & ADJUNCT LECTURER 2002 — Present Adjunct Training Faculty ■ Academy for Professional Excellence / San Diego State University Foundation 6505 Alvarado Road, Suite 107, San Diego, CA 92120. 2001 — Present Affiliate Faculty ■ University of San Diego, School of Education, Graduate Marriage & Family Therapy Program 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110-2492 2012 — Present Adjunct Faculty ■ Brandman University School, School of Arts and Sciences, Graduate Psychology —MFT Emphasis Program 3550 Vine Street, Suite 200, Riverside, CA 92507 Raymond Cameron, MFT Curriculum Vitae, continued CONFFERENCE PRESENTATIONS, WORKSHOP & SEMINAR FACILITATOR / TRAINER: Title Recovery Oriented Case Management Marital Systems and Studies and Domestic Violence Recovery Oriented Case Management Intimate Partner Violence & Child Abuse Assessment and Treatment of Substance Abuse The Counseling Process Working with Perpetrator of Intimate Partner Violence Lethality Assessment & Safety Planning with Families of Intimate Partner Violence Intimate Partner Violence: Assessment, Treatment, & Intervention Intimate Partner Violence: A Collaborative Response & The Linkages Program Intimate Partner Violence & Child Welfare Services Intimate Partner Violence: A Collaborative Response Working with Perpetrator of Intimate Partner Violence (e-learning it O-IgMO&ale) Intimate Partner Violence for Child Welfare & CalWorks The Use of Genograms with Court Ordered Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators Intimate Partner Violence & Child Welfare Services Interventions & Case Planning with Intimate Partner Violence Working with Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence Intimate Partner Violence Interventions & Safety Planning Case Management Issues in Family Violence Cases Family Violence: Assessment, Treatment, & intervention. Family Violence: Assessment, Treatment, & Intervention. Family Violence: Assessment, Treatment, & Intervention. Family Violence: Assessment, Treatment, & Intervention. Family Violence & Elder Abuse Treatment Issues in Family Violence Family Violence and Case Management Family Violence and Child Welfare System Research Project Presentation on Preliminary Findings from Family Violence Shelter Outcome Study Page: 3 of 4 Location Date(s) University of San Diego, MFT Program 2013 - Present Brandman University, Graduate Psychology — MFT Program 2013 - Present University of San Diego, MFT Program 2013 - Present University of San Diego, MFT Program 2012 - Present Brandman University, Graduate Psychology — MFT Program 2012 - Present Brandman University, Graduate Psychology — MFT Program 2012 - Present Public Child Welfare Training Academy, Southern Region, 2008 - Present San Diego State University Foundation Public Child Welfare Training Academy, Southern Region, 2003 - Present San Diego State University Foundation University of San Diego, MFT Program 2001 - 2012 San Luis Obispo County Dept Of Social Services 2012 Central California Training Academy - California State University, Fresno Foundation Public Child Welfare Training Academy, Southern Region, 2002 - 2011 San Diego State University Foundation San Luis Obispo County Dept of Social Services 2011 University of California, Davis Extension, Resource Center for Family Focused Practice Public Child Welfare Training Academy, Southern Region,_ 2010 San Diego State University Foundation The Child and Family Policy Institute of California Linkages 2010 Convening IP Annual International Conference on Violence, Abuse, & 2007 Trauma California State University San Bernardino Foundation 2007 Orange County Department of Social Services 2007 Orange County Department of Social Services 2007 (range County Department of Social Services 2006 - 2007 71h Annual Cal State San Bernardino School of Social Work 2004 Case Management Symposium San Diego State University, School of Social Work, Office of 2004 Professional Development Inland Empire Chapter of California Association of Marriage 2003-2004 and Family Therapists San Bernardino County DPSS 2003 San Bernardino County Superior Courts 2003 Riverside County DPSS Training & Development 2002 California State University, San Bernardino, MSW Program 2002 San Diego State University, MSW Program 2001 San Diego State University, MSW Program 2000 California Department of Health Services Maternal and Child 1996 Health Branch Conference Costa Mesa, CA. Raymond Cameron, MFT Curriculum Vitae, continued Page: 4 of 4 PUBLICATIONS & ARTICLES 2000 Cameron, R. (2000) Marriage & Family Therapist Interns and the Reporting of Child Abuse. San Diego Therapist. San Diego, CA 1997 Cameron, R. (1997) Depression in Domestic Violence Victims Seeking Shelter Services: A Victim Needs Assessment Study. California Department of Health Services, Maternal and Child Health Branch. Sacramento, CA. MEDIA 2013 What Women Want to Talk About: Episode 28 — Women Who Have "Lost" Themselves (podcast). Interview with Kelly Orchard of It's All About Women (http•IliWilaboutwoinen.com/mind/what-women-want-to-talk-about-episode-28-women- who-have-lost-themselves/ September 2013) 2013 What Women Want to Talk About: Episode 3 — Intimate Partner Violence (podcast). Interview with Kelly Orchard of It's All About Women:1/itsallaboutwomen.com/relationshi intimate rtner-violence/ January 2013) 2008 Five Tips to Rekindle the Passion in Your Relationship. Interviewed by Jennifer Dean, for Features Section, The Press -Enterprise 02/03/2008 2007 A Conversation with Marriage and Family Therapist Raymond Cameron, MFT. By Peter Surowski Valley News 2/9/2007 2007 Coping with a Traumatic Event, a pre-recorded phone interview for Inland Empire Matters with Erin O'Toole on Radio Station KVCR 91.9 FM. SERVICE AWARDS 2/12 Outstanding Chapter Leader, California Association of Marriage & Family Therapists 6/01 Dedication to Critical Mental Health Services, County of San Diego Health &Human Services Agency 6/01 Certificate of Recognition for Crisis Response Team, San Diego County Board of Supervisors, Dianne Jacobs, Supervisor, Second District. NON -CLINICAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 5/91 — 6/95 Music Teacher: Teaching children, adolescents, and adults musical theory and techniques: developing lesson plans, student evaluation protocols, and student learning techniques that motivate student interest and participation. 1/89 — 9/93 Professional Audio & Lighting Technician: Theatre & commercial sound design, free-lance audio engineer, free-lance lighting technician. 2/80 — 10/98 Professional Musician: Professional musician, freelance musician, studio musician, and managing partner in a limited musical partnership with responsibilities for performances, contractual negotiations; obtaining legal counsel; supervision of purchasing, employees, advertising, accounting, travel arrangements, and daily business affairs. AFFILIATIONS ■ Clinical Member of the Southwest Riverside County Chapter of CAMFT: 2009 -Present ■ Clinical Member of the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists (CAMFT): 2001 —Present ■ Clinical Member of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT): 2001 — Present ■ President of the Southwest Riverside County Chapter of CAMFT: 2010 ■ Member of the San Diego Domestic Violence Council, Shelter & Support Services Subcommittee: 2000 ■ Member of the San Diego Domestic Violence Council, Research and Statistics Subcommittee: 1996 — 1997 ■ Student/ Intern Member of the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists (CAMFT): 1995 — 2001 ■ Student/ Intem Member of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT): 1995 — 2001 Raymond F. Cameron, M.A., Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist, Inc. California State MFT License: MFC 38236 Address+ _ Temecula, CA 92592 ; Telephone Fax: E-mail:+ Website. Raymond Cameron, M.A., MFT is a Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist currently in Private Practice in Southern California. Raymond received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Philosophy (cum laude) from the University of California, San Diego, and his Master of Arts degree in Marriage & Family Therapy from the University of San Diego. Raymond's Areas of Clinical Emphasis & Interest Include: • Helping victims, perpetrators, and families experiencing Intimate Partner Violence including designing and implementing outcome research on shelter effectiveness, working with victims and families, as well as treating perpetrators in Batterer Intervention Programs. • Helping adults, adolescents, and their families who are experiencing Alcohol and Drug Abuse issues including how alcohol and drug abuse affects the entire family as well as the individual. • Helping Adolescents and their families regarding growth and development issues, depression, suicidal thoughts, anxiety, stress, trauma, conflict, communication problems, drugs and alcohol problems, self -injurious behaviors, and aggression. • Helping individuals, couples, and families experiencing Affective Disorders such as depression, anxiety, Bi-Polar disorder, stress, trauma, and adjusting to life changes and unexpected crisis. • Helping Families with communication problems, conflict, intimacy issues, parenting techniques, and divorce decisions. • Men's Growth & Empowerment Issues including the changing expectations of men in society, men as husbands in the 21 st century, the role of fathers in families, men and their own fathers, as well as the coping with the various issues listed above. Raymond worked in Child Welfare Services for San Diego County Children's Services Bureau (CPS) in the Family Violence Unit (a collaborative project between Children Services Bureau & the San Diego County Department of Adult Probation), Riverside County and San Diego County Departments of Mental Health, Phoenix House of California, and various non-profit and social service agencies. Raymond currently is an Affiliate Faculty member of the University of San Diego Marriage & Family Therapy program as well as a Trainer for the Academy for Professional Excellence through the San Diego State University School of Social Work. Raymond is a Clinical Member of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, a Clinical Member of the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists, and the Past - President of the Southwest Riverside County Chapter of the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists. Raymond F. Cameron, M.A., Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist, Inc. w Ott t19,� l J City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for health and Family Safety is to serve as a grassroots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our to Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knoweldge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Andrew Doan, MD, PhD Residential Address: Temecula CA 92592 Business Address: Temecula, CA 92592 Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I am concerned for our youth and want to do all I can to help the youth and families in our community. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? I have expertise in learnin & memoKy, gamingaddiction and serve as a recovery ministry leader at Rancho Community Church. I am also a doctor and neuroscientist who understands addictive behavior and human behavior. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? „i can yrgyidg research knowledge about education, addictions, and neuro-development in children. I also provide insight in technology & gamine addictions in the youth. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? I can devote 1-3 hours weekly to Task Force. Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization Mx Higher Education xx TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch XxCivic/Volunteer groups, -- Non-profit agencies xx Youth Serving Organizations _ Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Stree4 Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** y Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. City of Temecula j9pY City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information. obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and genera 'ons to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name. - Residential Address: Business Address: Phone: eru1 Ec T� e-c,La ; CA 9A59 / Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? T a iSIC UeSAacinc] 16Ut 4 akl6twzLtv rlee. 4"U 1e, ! i r, 61;s5eiY? i n afin 66, a&d_ressl`rr!q tkc so icc.-H&n s . Why do you feel that you ' arequalifiedto serve on the Local .T�+ay1}s�k Force Committee? .yp/r.� l}dri— AQfAizn��� _ . • r •��VIF/11�7 1lfi� u Vl i i'�G�I1� of--Hie-tieects 6-� pwt- 8o(.c4- 7 What ideas and pers*ctives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission the Task Force!? .. , r P` _ a r . I _ .. l l .,I tT� lT 1 0 r4 _r [A ) A 71 � d raisi jieca5 0,41 d ba + How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? i� �,n,l,v. f'lrlsrra�,if,in Thu if_f]f'I ule_ • 10 - h Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization T Higher Education TV USD (K-12) — PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ CivicNolunteer Groups. — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations Other ftne Xnec� Qr,�y�f 0�-r� � PTA rnevn6,r a,,t a. su6s�i fv�e +eac k,er ', r rtW U5 D Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@citygjtemeculmorg or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. ©ri aile • City of Temecu aCity Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force CommitteeMember Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi- annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: William `Bill' Gould Residential Address: Menifee Ca 92586 Business Address: Temecula Ca 92590 Phone: Email: O.W._ Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? -I was an active participant of the Youth Master Plan process and would very much like to help it move forward. Having grown up here in Temecula Valley as a High Schooler, I would like to continue to make the area more youth friendly. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? - I feel qualified to serve based on my years of experience in working with local youth l families both as an entertainment promoter booking local youth acts and my 4 years as a Trustee on the Romoland School Board in Menifee. I have also served on the Helping Americas Youth committee thru the Boys and Girls club and was an appointed member of the City of Menifee Trails Commission. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? - I will bring the perspective of a guy who went to 2 different high schools in the valley and have owned and operated multiple coffee houses and still owns an entertainment promotion company focused on providing fun for teens and families. I also have 4 years of experience as an elected official, so I understand the `ins and outs' of government. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? - I have a few hours a week I can commit to, as long as I have a weeks notice to plan my schedule so I can attend. Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch Civic/Volunteer Groups_ Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _X_ Other X_Former School Board Member Th. H.— FSo�chern Cp�n,_ City of Temecul a c—t- d.- City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and generations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to Participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Residential Address: Business Address: Phone: {--lea-Reams VQ--J LA- 6,4- zs� Email:19-1 Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Commi ee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? 3 ol,-� z What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? cr c.u(c� V\ How many hours per } "ttiS{e't --bo Rio ) 44AA AA . - :klmonth on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA ✓Neigborhood Watch _ CivicNolunteer Groups. — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to subrnit applications is October 1st, 2013*x Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Neart of Southern Gad+farnip City of Temecula , '+Vine Cuuntry City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Residential Address: C { Opt Business Address: Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? M Tee /i ce► r Jt f f"3 r_y -------------- G,_7 d- r- rt What ideas and perspe es will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? How many hours per weeklmonth on average are you wilag tdcdmmit to a Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student ✓ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA — Neigborhood Watch _ CivicNolunteer Groups. — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 "Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2913** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. aVvarita Muse, TIM On the Run to Excellence MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL Karen Hayes, Principal September 26, 2013 City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health And Family Safety 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Sir or Madam, it is with great pleasure that I write Letter of Recommendation on behalf of Matthew Harrigan. I have been his principal over the past three years and have found him to be a very intelligent and outstanding young man. Matthew informed me that he would like to be a part of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety. With Matthew's high intellect and problem -solving abilities, I think Matthew would be able to help you with sparking ideas, sharing information, identifying needs, collaborating and advocating for policy. Though he is young, he has wisdom beyond his years and would enjoy being a participant in the political process of developing initiatives at the grass -roots level. Over the past three years, Matthew has been an outstanding student, who is recognized by the educators at my school as a divergent and critical thinker. He would enjoy being a part of a Task Force that develops and creates initiatives for creating a better community for the children of Temecula. I know Matthew would work hard, be very committed to giving you his best, and be a great contributor to the committee. Feel free to contact me if you should have any questions. Sincerely, I/Atd Karen E. Hayes Principal 30600 Margarita Road • Temecula, CA92591 Phone (951 ) 695-7370 Fax 1 j 59,5-7''7R Thr 4eart of Southern Cni.fa�m� Cl 1999 V �o,� ry City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. I Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Residential Address: Business Address: Phone: Email: _ .- Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? /A`3 0. +0 ha a- S c-�{ v� Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? Jr— OT15 0�� y' ; "r ; , 1 �, � Ire , `( U..i IP - C t What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force?i,,�¢ 'C,. , r"' ' j t'r'j -4, "Vn C v r`^ ("- How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force co ttee: Senior Citizen �. College Student High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch — CivicNolunteer Groups — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations Other Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 "Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013Xx Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. prita Must' On the Run to Excellence MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL Karen Hayes, Principal September 27, 2013 City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health And Family Safety 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Whom It May Concern I am delighted to be able to write this Letter of Recommendation on behalf of Henry Harrigan. I have known Henry for four years in an educational capacity as his principal. He is truly a phenomenal young man with amazing capabilities and insight. In reading about the Local Task Force, I was quite impressed with your mission, role and responsibilities. I can understand why you are actively seeking concerned high school students who are willing to work hard and seek viable solutions. Henry is a fine, ethical young man who is quite aware of the dangerous teen social issues. His ability to share his experiences and knowledge will impress you as he is quite articulate and not afraid to speak the truth as he sees it. His intelligence will allow him to comprehend any issues that may be "on the table." He's been a 4.0 student over the past three years. Henry is the type of young man that will point out current issues that his peers and he are experiencing, but then he will critically think through the issues and then offer viable solutions to solve the problems. A couple of years ago when the school district was trying to get Measure Y passed, I reached out to my parents and students to help us make phone calls to our community. There were only two dedicated students who stepped forward to "get involved" and Henry was one of them. He enthusiastically came on 2 separate occasions to educate the voting community about the attributes of Measure Y and I truly believe that some adults voted "yes" because they heard a young voice on the other end of the phone explaining how it would benefit him and other students... it was quite powerful! I think Henry would be a great asset to your Local Task Force. His enthusiasm and dedication will make him a worthwhile member. Sincerely, Karen E. Hayes% Principal 30600 Margarita Road • Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (951) 695- 7 370 Fax (9 7 i ',;93-77 R 1� City of Temecula: City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grassroots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and eenerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knoweldge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. WUL Name. � J /7e4 Residential Address- Business Address: Phone: l� r- � �.W- "�,.3 A. Ei ail: 10-...!-e oo 'siae va:I asp Force C:) ;m 'IC"?�, 4- Wry do you feel Lhar you are aualir:ed to serve on the Local Task Force Cor=auee? F-h, rnIt)/ J,P/:7 )1)I Vh,%l7. r?j rr'r A C i'/.�'7I� e►-f What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? 1: -l-KIC If How rn ary hours per w-2eklmonth on average are you willing to con^mit to the Task l orce?M—� M�I Please check of ffie fcflowinv areas that you feel best quafies you to serve on the local task force committee; Senior Cir.izen _ College Student — y- 3iigr Schoo.( Student Hi4i;er Fd;.icar_:o^ `u.'vS'D.(K- .�,' -- -PT.�? -- Neiuborhood V,4--- ! C1"lij1'V%71i1P, er ro��.p5e_ yur - prnr�t agAnc ipsYouth Sv3 , inn Orga nizatiors •..0 � __ _— �._'--. °..fir:.`, ._.. -- _�f �=._: �- _ j - , r Pease s,Pbma.app ications to Temecula Cammaniila Services Department 41-fAI O Main St, eer., Tern,cuia CA 92,590 " I)J "sadtine ii,i ..+3hao, _ i� ??;' ¢I( v... '5-.INT.;)ber Ist ems? ?rae;o does po*=U7r3f]t .1ol�i i� CI or,-Ppc! tment P orc,:. ._.-= mmuc ula'Cori:im'13 i-V 4- Wry do you feel Lhar you are aualir:ed to serve on the Local Task Force Cor=auee? F-h, rnIt)/ J,P/:7 )1)I Vh,%l7. r?j rr'r A C i'/.�'7I� e►-f What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? 1: -l-KIC If How rn ary hours per w-2eklmonth on average are you willing to con^mit to the Task l orce?M—� M�I Please check of ffie fcflowinv areas that you feel best quafies you to serve on the local task force committee; Senior Cir.izen _ College Student — y- 3iigr Schoo.( Student Hi4i;er Fd;.icar_:o^ `u.'vS'D.(K- .�,' -- -PT.�? -- Neiuborhood V,4--- ! C1"lij1'V%71i1P, er ro��.p5e_ yur - prnr�t agAnc ipsYouth Sv3 , inn Orga nizatiors •..0 � __ _— �._'--. °..fir:.`, ._.. -- _�f �=._: �- _ j - , r Pease s,Pbma.app ications to Temecula Cammaniila Services Department 41-fAI O Main St, eer., Tern,cuia CA 92,590 " I)J "sadtine ii,i ..+3hao, _ i� ??;' ¢I( v... '5-.INT.;)ber Ist ems? ?rae;o does po*=U7r3f]t .1ol�i i� CI or,-Ppc! tment P orc,:. ._.-= mmuc ula'Cori:im'13 i-V City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for health and Family Safety is to serve as a grassroots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a snared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knoweldge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: / ),/ V 4 r Residential Address: 5;� Business Address: Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I've been Temecula's resident, since1994; for the past 19 years I've seeing the city developed into a vibrant community, yet it has to overcome the challenges of growing population, homelessness, socioeconomic development, and youth programs. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? I have life and professional experience to assess community -based needs focusing on prevention instead of intervention. I obtained three Associates of Arts degrees: Humanities, Social Science, and Liberal Arts in addition to Social and Behavioral Science Bachelor of Arts in Psychology. Furthermore, I was accepted in the Master Program of Social Work. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? I will focus in identifying the community's needs; for example, to keep a balance between growth and socioeconomic development, in addition to engaging senior in community activities. Also, to meet these challenges, the Local Task Force Committee must to design outreach programs establishing partnerships with schools, hospitals, universities, and government agencies. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? I have a vested interest in the community, my grandchildren live in Temecula. I'm willing to commit the necessary hours to accomplish the tasks at hand. Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen_ College Student_ High School Student_ Faith -Based Organization_ Higher Education X TVUSD (K-12)_ PTA Neighborhood Watch_ Civic/Volunteer group Non-profit agencies_ Youth Serving Organization_ Other Temecula resident/grandmother/woman Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41.000 Main Street, Temecula C4 92591 "Deadline to submit aoplication is October 1'.. 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right of appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Service Department at (951)694-6480. Martha A. Howard Temecula, California ,phone email Areas of Practice: Social and Behavioral Science Administrative Support Medical Administrative Support Human Development Experience 100% of experience devoted to Psychosocial and Human Development Services Internship Hospice of the Valleys (Temecula) Education: California State University San Bernardino, San Bernardino California M.A_ Social Work (Accepted and attended Fall Quarter 2008) California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, California 2006 B.A. Psychology Honors and Awards: Recipient, Honor Student Award Council DSP Representative (2002) Past Employment Positions: Hospice of the Valleys, Murrieta, California Rancho Springs Medical Center, Murrieta, California MCAS Miramar CDC, San Diego, California City ®f Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grassroots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knoweldge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: 1je4d ! ant s Residential Address: Business Address: L Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you fee that you are qualified to serve on a Local Task Force Committee? OPOWiL;IJ t <!��( ,ref �3 {vyd° W r Al -I Gvs What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? VO-1 "o L4t�AA �j& +6 6,, nW,� k-; VW? cj-- r, How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student— Faith -Based Organization_ Higher Education_ TVUSD (K-12)X PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ CivicNolunteer groups_ Non-profit agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations — Other Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 "Cauiuic to Suviiiit applicauvras 'IS v%tvver ist, AILPAJ* Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. ' City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and izenerations. to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Michelle A. Jones Residential Address: Temecula, CA 92590 Business Address: Temecula, CA 92590 Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I have an interest in developing local programs for youth to motivate and inspire them to learn about STEM fields. I am a local business owner of an environmental consulting firm. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? I am qualified because I have been running a company for the last 20 years in the environmental field. I can use my skills as an engineering and a business owner to create programs to serve Youth in the STEM fielgi What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? I have a network of organizations that can provide grants to support on -going programming for youth. am interested in starting a local STEM monthly program for youth that addresses riling math and science competency gaps. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? 10 hours/week Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ CivicNolunteer Groups✓ Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Other Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 4I000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Cityof Temecula .a.. City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Jeannette McGrath Residential Address: Murrieta, CA 92562 R11Q1nPeQ arIfIrPac• Sigil Social Foundation Buisness Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? Please see atta he dac m nt What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? A / 1) MT MITI Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ Civic/Volunteer Groups — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations Other Please refer to attached document Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For moire information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I have a Qassion for helpingpeople. I would life to provide support for people within the community while identifying their needs and helping to make sure their needs are met. Additionally, I would like to provide Children Adolescents Teens Youth at Risk Adults and Families information and resources. I would like to provide resources and information that can help people within the community better understand and cape with today's determining factors. Furthermore. I would Iike to help individuals define their problem(s) or issue(s) clearly and teach them how to envision the ideal solution. Some of my goals include; helping individuals develop social skills as they learn to strengthen their abili1y to nurture change and growth seek and maintain social support networks and develop helpful coping skills that will enable them to adapt to their environment encourage positive parenting skills, family relationships, and social development. I would like to assist individuals, families, and couples struggling with their marriage, vocation self-confidence finances and other areas of their life. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? I am a roistered Marriage Family Therapist Intern with the California Board of Behavioral Science Intern # 69167 .1 hold a Master's of Science Deme in Counseling Marriage. Family, and Child Therapy. In addition I hold a Bachelor's of Science Degree in Human. Services and Management and an Associate's of Science De ee in Social Behavioral Science. I have 20 years of ex rience working with children I specialize in Child, Adolescents Teen Adult Couples and Family Therapy. I have worked with Youth at Risk Youth on Probation Victims of Domestic Violence, PTSD clients, Traumas. Tragedies Addictions Crisis Children with Special ]'deeds. Behavioral Modification, Reconstruction of Communication Stress Management, Social Skills, and Conflict Resolution. I promote Independence and Self AdvocacyI provide Career Counseling and Professional Development, Help with Loss and Grief, and. Individuals in Transition. I have extraordin knowled a of Alternative to Domestic Violence ADV and I am a strong advocate for victims of domestic violence. I am also a single mother of two beautiful children an 18- ear -old girl and a I3- ear -old -son. M_y experience also includes working with adults children . -youth and families with various VsychologicaL social emotional and behavioral challenges. I am skilled in counseling individuals with drug and alcohol addictions including adolescents in group homes In addition I have worked with victims of domestic violence, low-income families, the homeless and under -served populations. including clients with personalily disorders i.e. schizo hrenia . In the past, I was on a preschool board and heIW4 develop the indoor and outdoor environment for the preschool I also helped hire the supervisor and teachers. In addition, I taught preschool for 3-years. and was a vouth adviser for 5 years for high school kids and middle school kids. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? First of all I believe we need to conduct a needs assessment for the community. I believe we need to educate the communi about alcohol and drug addiction. Individuals with drug and alcohol addictions need to learn how to im rove their ougHty of personal life and gain a better picture of their future and Iife goals.-Thgy need to be encouraged to have an ongoing abstinence from alI mood -altering chemicals. Thpy need to learn how to build positive relationshi s that lead to alleviation and help prevent relapse of drug and alcohol use. Drug and alcohol addicts need to realize that LhM are being given a second chance As a Task Force we need to provide education, information, and resources for people within the communily to various places that can provide the help and support thgy need. We need to heI people within the community learn that the choices they choose to make today can affect them for the rest of their lives. Mmy adults have negative and stereapical views when it comes to teenagers. Adults often have irrational MrcMtions of teenagers and under estimate their capabilities. Therefore I Believe that the adults within our community need work in full partnership with teens and work together dealing with issues facing our youth. This will help adults have a different perspective about teens and learn and understand that adolescents and teen have a lot of potential. To ether I believe we should find Jeannette McGrath page 1 someone who has expertise in_grant writing and pursue our options and acquire information about Vant funding. I believe we should look at the histga of the Task Force work together, evaluate the Task Force's effectiveness and implement successful ideas and plans The Task Force should oversee the grog am, collect data for further information. and evaluate the program's effectiveness every so often, and address any new needs that may arise within the community. Community needs can change often dependin on circumstantial conditions that may arise. The Task Force needs to do eveWhing they make sure they are providing the communi1y with their much needed support and guidance. I believe some people within our communi1y need to learn positive social development. They need to learn how to strengthen their ability to nurture change and gLowth, seek and maintain social support networks and develop hel fW copinp. skills that will enable them to adapt to their environment. The Task Force needs to. encouM a positive parenting skills and family relationships. The Task Force should work with the school districts to make sure evea child's educational needs are being met. I also believe that the Task Force needs to work together, find out what types of activities children, adolescents, and teens enjoy and come up with a plan with the help of various companies and non-profit organizations and develop after school programs that fits their interest and encourages their excitement. They need an outlet from their eve da stresses both at home and at school. The more things thqy have to choose from the less time I!Ley will have to get into trouble and associate with people who may be a bad influence. The Task Force should. look at transportation options for the kids in school including transportation for kids who want to artici ate in an after school promm. The Task Force should provide education and help- people within the communi build an awareness about important issues as Lhey relate to children adolescents teens and teens at ris as well as families. -Bullying and health and family issues should also be addressed. The Task Force should provide education and resources related to these matters. As a volunteer Marriaee and Family Therapist Inter at Sigil Social, I am planning on starting up several different types of Uoups. On in particular is called "Is My Relationship Healthy/Understanding Domestic Violence." This rMup will be open to anyone who is interested esMially teens so th%y can be educated about domestic violence and help them have better insight into how healthy their relationship are with their friend (s) and current ba friend/ irlfriend. If the goup has a good mix between teens and adults I may start a group for se crate groups. Eventually, I Ian on starting up support groups for parents and teens. Parenting group topics will include but not limited to: Positive parenting -skills, setting.healthy boundaries for their children/teens support for sin lg_e parents assistance in developing behavioral modification plans, positiveparent/ child/ teen relationshi s and healthy family relationships. Other gmups I intend to start consist of a su ort Uoup for p2rgnts with children with special needs a support Uoup for children with special needs and their siblings. and career counseling and professional develo meat. Once I develop these progoms and decide on a date to I planon handing out fliers to peole in m neighborhoodpeople within the community, and people throughout the city. I also plan to educate and provide fliers for community health care pmviders, other non:profit organizations, including -faith -based faith- based organizations, schools districts and individual high schools middle schools and colle es. I want to be able to reach out to as many Wople as possible— teenagers. I also would like to attend various community events which will give me the opportunity to educate and infornn people within the community about important issues within the community and address their own personal needs. I will also be able to ass out fliers and provide information about other events and invite them to attend a gLoup that relates to them personally. This will also give me the chance to receive feedback about special needs within the community that have not been addressed. How many hours per week/month on an average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Approximately 5 -10 hours or more per week. Jeannette McGrath page 2 Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local Task Force committee: Senior Citizen College Student High School Student Faith -Based Organization Higher Education_ TVUSD (K-12)_ PTA _ Neighborhood Watch _ CivicNolunteer Groups Non- Profit Agencies_ Youth Serving Organizations, Other: Registered Marriage Family Thera ist Intern with the California Board of Behavioral Science Intern 4 69167 Master's of Science De ee in Counseling Marria a Family, and Child TherapL Bachelor's of Science Degrqe in Human Services and Mann ement and Associate's of Science Degree in Social Behavioral Science. In addition I volunteer at the non-profit a enc Si it Social Foundation as a Marriage Family Therapist Intern. Please submit applications to Yvett.Martinez@citEoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the Task Force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Jeannette McGrath page 3 a - _ NI MrNwf it � u t CRY of Temecula CRA,' Council Action Committee for Health and Family SafetN. 2013 Lo QQ A Tzv�k Foive Committee Memtber Application The mission of the City Council action Committee for Health and Famill Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth. Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for LIM, Noill ] and gyner'ations to col"I '. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the CommuIIitl', collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically- toward action by follow ing a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report for as needed or requested) to the Cite Council. Name: Jeannette McG Residential Address: Murrieta, CA 925 Business Address Social Foundation T m Cula GA 225212 Buisness None: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I have a passion for hel,ging people. I would like to provide support for people within the community white identifying_ their needs and heI ing to make sure their needs are met. In addition, I would like to educate peopje within the communily about conflict resolution skills in order to resolve iniMersonat problems and teach them how to implement problem solving skills. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? I 007 . k.�.City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2a13 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grassroots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Fancily and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and ¢enerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knoweldge, commitment, cooperation, and wililinViess to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Ben Novell - Novell & Novell Counseling Services Inc. In lieu of Ben Novell: Liza Vega-Talknan, Community Outreach Director Residential Address: Murrieta, CA 92563 Temecula, CA 92592 Business Address: Temecula, CA 92591 Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Desire to improve quality of life in the Temecula community. To continue our collaboration with the City of Temecula. Our collaboration includes. Educational Series for Parents & Caregivers (Special Needs SeriesI. Gaming Addiction Informational Series, and just added participation with the City's Youth Advisory Council, providing presentations to youth a,Qes 14-18. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? Deputy Probation Officer for Riverside County 1981-1988. Mental Health provider in Temecula since 1989. Past board member for Alternatives to Domestic Violence. Currently provide services for clinical, family law, and Juvenile Courts. Provider for CPS & County Mental Health.. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? Perspective of challenges facing families within community ranging from parenting issues to violence in the home to working with abused childen. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? 1-2 hours weekly Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ Civic/Volunteer groups — Non -profit agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ t e Cornmunit Menial Health f}r anizatian Please submit applications to Yvette.MaM ez@cfty0ftemecuia.or9 or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **-Deadline to submit appllieadOw Is der .lam 20113** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. *Personal Outreach to our Temecula Community: We identified (1) low income housing apartment complex an( provided back to school items to 68 children in the month of September 2013. Due to the positive response, we extended our efforts and identified (2) additional low income housing apartment complexes and will be providin; Halloween treat bags for approximately 178 children in October 2013. City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and generations to come. - Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Residential Address: Business Address: Phone: Owen T�C-cuLn, CA `1�s9Z -rc-rk e cu ('- . G4 q Z S- Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? 7cAve;/" W t �2 3P�vtt - c i a� -f+ rAwx 00-mm;%�ee '+s 'T Ats Posi t t u�t �c� f c c7w�e1 Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? ' What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? 5 �N w a i call* �o�r oft If-ei, P +ti'/Vd�.i� ,! �lll � E s r y ejccry, o04&A S_e 1.:• f , Slit c`` How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization — Higher Education TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ Civic/Volunteer Groups — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations )� Other li�s W �7rr U7G i� suv. �Ccsf7c� Pit/ A�O�ct�s iNlrir�s�iews ('_SMZ' fl ler d des u rh.e Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 "Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Temecula, CA 92592 Home: Cell: Email: Robin W. Owens Objective Community Service Experience 2012-Present, First Team Real Estate, Temecula, CA Realtor, BRE# 01921539 Experience 2010- 2011, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, San Diego, CA Correctional Counselor II Supervisor ■ Review Inmate Classification Process and Reception Center Processing; Assist with Preparation of Inmate Endorsements for Classification Staff Representative ■ Affirm Inmate Parole Releases under the direction of the Correctional Counselor III • Draft, edit, and prepare administrative directives, and special duties as assigned. ■ Compile materials and assist in the preparation of reception center reports. • Assembly Bill 109 Prison Realignment Liaison between state facility and county probation departments reviewing release determination and process documents, written and verbal communication. • Assist in Training staff on operational policy and procedures. Experience CDCR Division of Juvenile Justice Program Administrator ■ Subject Matter Expert for Juvenile Programming at institutional level ■ HGSYCF Farrell Remedial Plan Coordinator for Heman G. Stark Youth Correctional Facility. • Review disciplinary dispositions and monitor grievances ■ Chair Facility Use of Force Review Committee • Make oral presentations to stakeholders and participate in community outreach as necessary. ■ Designated as a court compliance liaison for the HGSYCF Chino, CA facility. ■ Prepare written reports and investigative reviews. ■ Developed and implemented an interim facility daily program tracking system, Crisis Resolution Team and Case Manager at HGSYCF. ■ Supervision of 90 to 100 employees and 200 high -risk youthful offenders and 100 low to moderate risk offenders. ■ Attended and participated in local civic community stakeholder meetings/training. - Interview, hire, and train personnel; Coordinate with Human Resources regarding position allocations and attendance and time off concerns ■ 2007-2009, CDCR Division of Juvenile Justice Chino, CA Treatment Team Supervisor ■ Member of HQ Division of Juvenile Justice Farrell Reform Team Sacramento, CA (2006) developing two consent decree areas in youthful offender program service day scheduling and special management program for high risk offenders. ■ Manager of largest juvenile recalcitrant and Residential Substance Abuse Treatment programs in CDCR DJJ. ■ Implemented offender behavior incentive program for low risk offenders. ■ Subject matter expert in Juvenile recalcitrant programs. ■ 2002-2007, 2010 CDCR DJJ, HGSYCF, Chino, CA Senior Youth Correctional Counselor ■ Developed counseling program for subordinate staff and offenders. ■ Conducted offender disciplinary reviews and offender complaint mediation. ■ Residential Substance Abuse and Special Management Program Supervisor; and subject matter expert for RSAT and SMP. ■ 1993-2002 California Youth Authority, HGSYCF, Chino, CA Youth Counselor/Group Supervisor ■ P.C.832 ■ Custody, security, treatment and training for youthful offenders ■ Received Letter of Commendation for outstanding case report writing. ■ Conducted small and large group counseling, ■ Unit Gang Coordinator ■ Basic fire prevention training and assigned to fire camp in conjunction with public service crews and California with Department of Forestry at Oak Glen YCC Yucaipa, CA ■ 1987-1993 California Youth Authority, OGYCC, YTS, Chino, CA Retail Store Manager, Chief Auto Parts 1982-1987 • Retail Store Manager, 1986 to 1987 • Assistant Store Manager, 1982-1985 • High level Customer Service • Business to Business resale account recruitment. • Weekly Sales Audits • Inventory control • Completed daily bookkeeping and merchant bank deposits Education October 2008, Chapman University Orange, CA, Bachelor of Arts, Criminal Justice June 1982, Riverside City College Riverside, CA, Associate of Arts, General Education Studies Professional Affiliations California Association of Realtors National Association of Realtors Temecula Valley Realtor Mastermind Committee (Ad Hoc) California Correctional Peace Officers Association (Retired Chapter) International Brotherhood of Peace Officers Association of Black Correctional Workers The Owens Realty Group Robin Owens Making Home Ownership A Reality REALTORO BRE# 01921539 Temecula, CA uzoa i Phgne Fax: email: The finest compliment I can ever receive is a referral from my friends, business associates, and clients. f` I. V City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grassroots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and eenerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knoweldge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: Mark S. Perry Residential Address: Temecula, CA 92592 Business Address: HomeSmart Real Estate - Temecula CA 92590 (Member also of Knights of Columbus Temecula) Phone: -- - Email: 10 Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? I personally agree the City Growth has been fast, but the City Plan still has covered the construction of programs, facilities and outlet sources needed. I would love the opportunity to support the City's next steps in building a better use of these resources. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? Living in Temecula and being a part of the Ci 's growth since 1996, 1 have seen the changes first hand. Being involved with Community Service projects as well as working as a Real Estate Agent I have built a to a network of resources that could add value to this project. What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? I believe Temecula str les with growth that has left a gap in the community understanding of everything the City has to offer. My strength in Project Management, Marketing and Community Involvement offer the Task Force an experienced shoulder to work with. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? I would need a better understanding of the depth of the proiects being requested. i would believe a lot of these projects would be simply an extension of my current volunteer work within the community already. Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Student _ Faith -Based Organization XX Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ Civic/Volunteer groups — Non -profit agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Other Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Cityof Temecula n. Fl—I of 50A.m CAFOM's W—C—Irf City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Fai:iily and Health Task Force all(] create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and eenerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: 0� CV) t(u_ . R'Y CW\ Residential Address: Business Address: Phone: bee- . o- Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Commttee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force conunittee: Senior Citizen ,— College Student High School Student ^ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education TVUSD (K-12) _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch J Civi olunteer Groups — Non -Profit Agencies — Youth Serving Organizations Other - Please submit applications to Yvette.Mar.titrez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013"y Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. Name: Deanne Stott, Community Liaison Rady Children's Healthcare, Murrieta and Rady Children's Hospital San Diego Residential Address: Coronado, CA 92118 Former Residential Address: MEW Temecula, CA 92592 (formerly lived in Temecula for 15 years prior to Feb. 2013) Business Address: San Diego, CA 92123 Murrieta, CA 92562 Phone: E mail — Why are you Interested In participating on the Local Task Force Committee? As a health care professional whose organization specializes in pediatric and adolescent health and wellness, i am passionate about developing plans to educate the youth of Temecula of the dangers of alcohol and drug use, promiscuity and sexual activities, bullying, violence and social media dangers. As a mom of three teenagers who were raised in Temecula and a former substitute for the Temecula Unified School District, i recognize and the need for programs to help adolescents and teens cope with the pressures that surround them. One of my offices is located in that region and therefore, I am tied to many of the families who reside there. Additionally, of the children from the southern Riverside region who require hospitalization, approximately 47% are patients of RCHSD. We serve a great deal of families in that community and despite living in San Diego, I am still very connected. Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? While i am not a healthcare professional, I am the liaison to the resources, especially educational resources, which could prove beneficial to the creation and implementation of the plans that are developed by the Task Force. Rady Children's Hospital has departments such as the Chadwick Center, CAPS (Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Services), Infectious Disease Division, Eating Disorders Clinic, Autism Discovery Institute and the Gender Management Clinic which could provide valuable educational resources. Also, as a mom of three teens I have seen a lot and know first-hand the pressures that teens today are faced with and appreciate the many resources that my organization has for parents. What Ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? I will bring ideas regarding the dangers and the emotional impact that many of the activities teen engage in can have. 1 can provide educational resources that could be of help to the Task Force. I can work to recruit speakers, If desired, who could educate the community on the various emotional challenges that today's youth and teens are faced with. How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? It will vary based upon the project or task. I will be available to attend meetings and help plan events or implement the plans necessary to reach the objectives of the Task Force. I am available to up to 3 hours per week but more if needed. The area that best qualifies me to serve on the Local Task Force committee is "Youth Serving Organizations" 9 a 4�4� vr4 City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our vouth and eenerations to come. Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name: J Residential Address: Business Address: e Gw��. C 15-91 Phone: Mal) Ike,-,' M ll. Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? 4t'acA J j C �� Gti.�C ` 11 JY\ G��f- C Ac-PG-ricJ S-L \ 6 U l Li�c�� �.L V L 4'�} 1�(. i� •�i �1 C1 .J1-/ IBC i:: Q i� I. J� : -7 �i L 'e-Z.�.� S _0\xI+ L) (/- [ CJ a ✓\ /"L l.`/� � Tom{ Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? Cc, 7i'�-r T G� I" GAS T2 5 �Pe "ke Cc(wC G'k cl�-�G�.l A�l,�l �i\ .5"{-/'o.'E'-� mac"` . J �G�..J e I :J� c Li i'� �� : =� i c ...� (G / 'y�4✓; What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? 1 de L i,5, L Yt — /-1 l -, c e 5c��7�'—� , c���k G- l�,G� lei - s� i✓e r. How many hours per week/month on avrage are you willing to commit to the Task Force? (' C� y k c� G u .S A3Q IC f `ram- a Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School Students Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12)✓ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch _ Civic/Volunteer groups_ Non-profit agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Other Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 *Deadli-ne to submit applications is October 1st, 2013" Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. AT City of Temecula City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety 2013 Local Task Force Committee Member Application The mission of the City Council Action Committee for Health and Family Safety is to serve as a grass -roots working committee to disseminate locally information obtained from the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force and create and develop initiatives with a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for Role and Responsibilities of Local Task Force Members: 1. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. 2. Members of the Local Task Force will be appointed by Temecula City Council. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. 3. Applicants will be selected upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. 4. Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Name:' Residential Address: � (A 1 `� CtA Business Address: Phone: Email: Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? vo Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? U1V 1 w'I CI�+� � � C1` S o C7 Y arn G� � Orjer r�h � � �s �, eA new ��yhfia What ideas and peKspectives will you brieg in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? Ti rinn cM.ti.'jr<OA 1/1 the ftob1PM_ G� �V 10 Pfobli^< A A a Ie +ere,;r F �� i'ionS f 101v6n Gt,Y1 a-f fec4 - How many hours per week/month on average are y� willing to commit to the Task Force? UA 0 (u M M I T Jwu +4) hv,4 r 5 C-A W C K a Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: Senior Citizen _ College Student _ High School S d nt _ Faith -Based Organization _ Higher Education _ TVUSD (K-12 _ PTA _ Neigborhood Watch_ CivicNolunteer Groups — Non -Profit Agencies _ Youth Serving Organizations _ Please submit applications to Yvette.Martinez@cityoftemecula.org or Temecula Community Services Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 **Deadline to submit applications is October 1st, 2013** Submittal of application does not guarantee your right or appointment to serve on the task force. For more information, please contact Temecula Community Services Department at (951) 694-6480. TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL 31555 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, CA 92692 (951)695-7300 r� j• - September 26, 2013 To Whom It May Concern: ........ It is with eat ieasure that I write this letter of recommendation for Alex Willcaxi' Derek Held Today, 8 35 AM _..._ iswith ....&T....P .�... _ „._.. _.._.. _..__ _._ _ _ ..�..... c= In the two years I have been honored to know him, Alex has shown himself to be a capable, manure, and immensely caring young man. I was fortunate enough to know him in the capacity of a student in my sophomore English class, during which time I became aware of Mr. Willcox's insight and gift for analytical thought He stands as an example by which I will judge my English students for years to come: disciplined, focused, intelligent, and not without a mind of his own. I am most proud, however, of his exploits as a member of our growing Drama program. It is in the capacity of build leader and crew member that Alex continues to demonstrate to me his born leadership skills; additionally, his involvement in our campus Improv team ati-u-rns his ability for quick thought, teamwork, and an affinity for working with others, Most recently, Mr. Willcox has decided to found a performance group dedicated to integrating our special needs population into performance. This movement stems from Alex's longstanding desire to work: with and for an oftentimes woefully under represented section of any school's student population and his forthrightness and tenacity in undertaking such a project solidifies his place in my mind as one of highest respect. In closing, I can only say that I am proud to know and work with Alex Willcox: as a student, as a performer, and as an exceptional human being. Derek Heid Director of Theatre Arts, Temecula Valley High School September 28, 2013 To Whom it May Concern: I have known Alex Willcox for over 10 years and have seen him grow into a fine young man. His maturity level at 17 years of age is very impressive. My interactions with Alex include his volunteer activities with my non-profit, Our Nicholas Foundation, and as a player on my Club soccer team that I have coached for 5 years. As a volunteer for ONF he has shown great compassion for numerous autistic children whether it is through our sports activities or simply at a social event. As a soccer player he is a leader on the field and is a constant source of motivation and determination. I would recommend Alex for anything that requires hard work and compassion. Please feel free to call me with any questions. Sincerely, Mark Anselmo No. Name City of Why are you interested in Why do you feel that you are What ideas and perspectives will you bring in How many Please check Temecula participating on the Local Task qualified to serve on the Local Task order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? hours per one of the Resident Force Committee? Force Committee? week/month following areas Y/N? on average are that you feel you willing to best qualifies commit to the you to serve on Task Force? the local task force committee: 1 Andrews, Yes I am currently a stay at home Before and after becoming a parent I As a member of Big Brothers and Sister Young 5-10 hours a Non -Profit Rebecca mom, with a Finance/Accounting have had a passion for making a Professionals Committee I am familiar with week Agencies, background, that has recently difference in the youth in my being a part of a sub group that takes ideas and Youth Serving moved to the area and would love community. In my previous plans from the main overlaying cause and Organizations to get involved with my community I was involved in Big implements them into the community. I have community. Brothers Big Sisters, as a Big Sister, seen what works with BBBS and would like to as well as a member of the Big bring some of those ideas to the table. Brothers Big Sisters Young Professionals Committee. I believe in programs such as this one because I have seen firsthand that they work and do make a difference. 2 Bartz, Fred No/ Because I have a lot to offer and a My involvement as an HOA Board I believe we are ignoring are youths and need to 8-12 Hours Senior Citizen, Morgan lot of involvement in the President, N.W. Member, TCC get them involved in the communities' future, Minimum Neighborhood Hill Temecula Community. Member, and Co -Chair of SOS Hills and less time on their own. Watch, Civic/Volunteer Groups, Non - Profit Agencies, Other: HOA Board President, Member Temecula Citizen Corp 3 Budd, Rachel Yes I would like to make a difference I am a Temecula teenager, President As a teen I can help develop and implement I can commit High School in the lives of the City of of SADD (Students Against policies to ensure the health of Temecula youth. I to 3 hours each Student Temecula's youth. I am Destructive Decisions), Vice President will bring a unique point of view given the week. committed to many of the goals of of Chaparral High Schools ASB, one various groups I belong to. I think being a the Action Committee on of the ten National Teen Influencers member would be mutually beneficial to different levels and would like to for MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Chaparral High School, SADD, MADD, and the contribute at the City level. Driving) and President of Peer City as far as information sharing is concerned. Leaders. I have interned at the District No. Name City of Why are you interested in Why do you feel that you are What ideas and perspectives will you bring in How many Please check Temecula participating on the Local Task qualified to serve on the Local Task order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? hours per one of the Resident Force Committee? Force Committee? week/month following areas Y/N? on average are that you feel you willing to best qualifies commit to the you to serve on Task Force? the local task force committee: Attorney's Office and have seen firsthand what can happen to our local youth. 4 Cameron, No/Murri As a local health care As a Licensed Mental Health Assist and support the task force and children & Dependent on Local Health Raymond eta professional, I am continually Professional, I have been assisting and families in the community regarding alcohol needs of the Care looking for opportunity to 5serve supporting the children and families in drug use, abuse/violence, and safety issues. Task Force. Professional Business the children and families in the the Temecula Valley since 2001. My Address Temecula Valley. My goal to clinical experiences have been (City) provide guidance and support to working with teens and families Temecula the Health & Family Safety Task regarding alcohol & drug use, Force in any capacity determined abuse/violence, and safety issues in a necessary or need by the Task variety of treatment modalities Force. including outpatient clinical setting as well as residential treatment centers. (Please see attached CV) 5 Doan, Andrew Yes I am concerned for our youth and I have expertise in learning & I can provide research knowledge about I can devote 1- Faith Based want to do all I can to help the memory, gaming addiction, and serve education, addictions, and neuro- development in 3 hours weekly Organization, Business youth and families in our as a recovery ministry leader at children. I also provide insight in technology & to Task Force. Higher Address community. Rancho Community Church. I am also gaming addictions in the youth. Education, (City) a doctor and neuroscientist who Neighborhood Temecula understand addictive behavior and Watch, Non- human behavior. profit Agencies 6 Eckard, Cheryl Yes As a stakeholder I am interested I have raised 4 children in Temecula. Youth issues are family issues. We are all I have Other: concerned in the many issues facing youth Through my involvement in the affected. I would like to further engage parents flexibility in parent/citizen ( I and would like to be involved in schools, PTA, Education Foundation, by raising awareness and battling complacency. my schedule. am a PTA disseminating the information and scouts and church I have 10-20 hrs/with member and a addressing the solutions. understanding of the needs of our more time substitute teacher youth. when for TVUSD) necessary for special projects No. Name City of Why are you interested in Why do you feel that you are What ideas and perspectives will you bring in How many Please check Temecula participating on the Local Task qualified to serve on the Local Task order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? hours per one of the Resident Force Committee? Force Committee? week/month following areas Y/N? on average are that you feel you willing to best qualifies commit to the you to serve on Task Force? the local task force committee: 7 Gould, William No/Menif I was an active participant of the I feel qualified to serve based on my I will bring the perspective of a guy who went to I have a few Youth Serving ee Youth Master Plan process and years of experience in working with 2 different high schools in the valley and have hours a week I Organizations, would very much like to help it local youth/families both as an owned and operated multiple coffee houses and can commit to, Other: Former Business move forward. Having grown up entertainment promoter booking local still owns an entertainment promotion company as long as I School Board Address here in Temecula Valley as a youth acts and my 4 years as a Trustee focused on providing fun for teens and families. have a week's Member (City) High Schooler, I would like to on the Romoland School Board in I also have 4 years of experience as an elected notice to plan Temecula continue to make the area more Menifee. I have also served on the official, so I understand the `ins and outs' of my schedule so youth friendly. Helping Americas Youth committee government. I can attend. thru the Boys and Girls club and was an appointed member of the City of Menifee Trails Commission. 8 Harrigan, Yes I have two high school students I am a nine year veteran of PTA. I I know from experience that there are many I envision PTA Elizabeth who face dilemmas + challenges created, self -funded and ran an art willing parents who don't really know how to be spending about that didn't exist when I was their enrichment program at Rancho involved once their children move to middle and 12 hours a age. The electronic world is Elementary. I have also been a high schools. I would like to find ways to reach month, changing so fast that parents and classroom volunteer for seven years. out to them. equivalent to school administrators struggle to two meetings keep up. and one all -day event per month. 9 Harrigan, Yes I am a high school student, who is I am a high school student, who I will bring the perspective of a teenager, and I would be High School Matthew interested in having a say in everyday witness's teenagers grapple will be able to say if policies would be willing to Student Charles policies regarding teenagers. with administration and rules. considered unfair by my peers. contribute 8 hours per month. 10 Harrigan, Yes As a high school student I want to I am a high school student and have I have participated in other youth councils and 8 hours High School Henry be involved in my community. and continue to witness other students feel that they miss their mark. I want to help per/month Student There are a lot of community struggle in and outside of the make sure topics & programs are relevant. issues I want to have a say in. classroom. I have also participated in The youth advisory council at the No. Name City of Why are you interested in Why do you feel that you are What ideas and perspectives will you bring in How many Please check Temecula participating on the Local Task qualified to serve on the Local Task order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? hours per one of the Resident Force Committee? Force Committee? week/month following areas Y/N? on average are that you feel you willing to best qualifies commit to the you to serve on Task Force? the local task force committee: county level and have many hours of community services 11 Hollowell, No/Murri To provide educational Employed w/the local school district. Active, engaging ideas, activities, & workshops 2-3 hours per Youth Serving Shonda eta opportunities to the youth that Sincere passion for youth, Bachelor & (if applicable) that encourage exposure to week/10-12 Organizations, promotes character & moral Master's Degree in Education church community service and educational pursuits. hours per Other: development. volunteer month www.blackcoala nd roses society. wee bly.com 12 Howard, Yes I've been Temecula's resident, I have life and professional experience I will focus in identifying the community's I have a vested High Educations, Martha A. since 1994; for the past 10 years to assess community -based needs needs' for example, to keep a balance between interest in the Other: Temecula I've seeing the city developed focusing on prevention instead of growth and socioeconomic development, in community; resident/grandmo into a vibrant community, yet it intervention. I obtained three addition to engaging senior in community my ther/woman has to overcome the challenges of Associates of Arts degrees: activities. Also, to meet these challenges, the grandchildren growing population, Humanities, Social Science, and Local Task Force Committee must to design live in homelessness, socioeconomic Liberal Arts in addition to Social and outreach programs establishing partnerships with Temecula. I'm development, and youth Behavioral Science Bachelor of Arts schools, hospitals, universities, and government willing to programs. in Psychology. Furthermore, I was agencies. commit the accepted in the Master Program of necessary Social Work. hours to accomplish the tasks at hand. 13 Janis, Heidi Yes I am a member of the community, I am the health and wellness counselor I understand what issues our youth are being I would be TVUSD (K-12) have 2 young boys and work with at CHS so I am constantly searching faced with today and would love to help and be willing to Business teenage students. I have a vested and researching to find resources for part of a solution. commit as Address interest in getting more services my families that I work with. much time as (City) for my students and want a safe would be Temecula community for my children. needed to be a part of the team. 14 Jones, Michelle No/Del I have an interest in developing I am qualified because I have been I have a network of organizations that can 10 hours/week Civic/Volunteer No. Name City of Temecula Resident Y/N? Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: A. Luz local programs for youth to running a company for the last 20 provide grants to support on -going programming Groups motivate and inspire them to learn years in the environmental field. I can for youth. I am interested in starting a local Business about STEM fields. I am a local use my skills as an engineering and a STEM monthly program for youth that addresses Address business owner of an business owner to create programs to filing math and science competency gaps. (City) environmental consulting firm. serve Youth in the STEM fields. Temecula 15 McGrath, No/Murri I have a passion for helping I am a registered Marriage Family First of all, I believe we need to conduct a needs I have a I am a registered Jeannette eta people. I would like to provide Therapist Intern with the California assessment for the community. I believe we need passion for Marriage Family support for people within the Board of Behavioral Science (Intern# to educate the community about alcohol and drug helping people. Therapist Intern Business community while identifying their 69167). I hold a Master's of Science addiction. Individuals with drug and alcohol I would like to with the Address needs, and helping to make sure Degree in Counseling Marriage, addictions need to learn how to improve their provide California Board (City) their needs are met. Additionally, Family, and Child Therapy. In quality of personal life and gain a better picture support for of Behavioral Temecula I would like to provide Children, addition, I hold a Bachelor's of of their future and life goals. They need to be people within Science (Intern# Adolescents, Teens, Youth at Science Degree in Human Services encouraged to have an ongoing abstinence from the community 69167). I hold a Risk, Adults, and Families, and Management and an Associate's all mood -altering chemicals. They need to learn while Master's of information and resources. I of Science Degree in Social how to build positive relationships that lead to identifying Science Degree would like to provide resources Behavioral Science. I have 20 years of alleviation and help prevent relapse of drug and their needs, in Counseling and information that can help experience working with Youth at alcohol use. Drug and alcohol addicts need to and helping to Marriage, people within the community Risk, Youth on Probation, Victims of realize that they are being given a second chance. make sure their Family, and better understand and cope with Domestic Violence, PTSD clients, As a Task Force we need to provide education, needs are met. Child Therapy. todays determining factors. Traumas, Tragedies, Addictions, information, and resources for people within the Additionally, I In addition, I Furthermore, I would like to help Crisis, Children with Special Needs, community to various places that can provide the would like to hold a individuals define their Behavioral Modification, help and support they need. We need to help provide Bachelor's of problem(s) or issues(s) clearly Reconstruction of Communications, people within the community learn that the Children, Science Degree and teach them how to envision Stress Management, Social Skills, and choices they choose to make today can affect Adolescents, in Human the ideal solution. Some of my Conflict Resolution. I promote them for the rest of their lives. Many adults have Teens, Youth Services and goals include: helping individuals Independence and Self Advocacy. I negative and stereotypical views when it comes at Risk, Adults, Management and develop social skills, as they learn provide Career Counseling and to teenagers. Adults often have irrational and Families, an Associate's of to strengthen their ability to Professional Development, Help with perceptions of teenagers and under estimate their information Science Degree nurture change and growth, seek Loss and Grief, and Individuals in capabilities. Therefore, I believe that the adults and resources. in Social and maintain social support Transition. I have extraordinary within our community need work in full I would like to Behavioral No. Name City of Temecula Resident Y/N? Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: networks, and develop helpful knowledge of Alternative to Domestic partnership with teens and work together dealing provide Science. I have coping skills that will enable them Violence (ADV) and I am a strong with issues facing our youth. This will help resources and 20 years of to adapt to their environment, advocate for victims of domestic adults have different perspective about teens and information experience encourage positive parenting violence. I am also a single mother of learn and understand that adolescents and teen that can help working with skills, family relationships, and two beautiful children; an 18-year-old have a lot of potential. Together, I believe we people within Youth at Risk, social development. I would like girl and a 13-year-old son. My should find someone who has expertise in grant the community Youth on to assist individuals, families, and experience also includes working with writing and pursue our options and acquire better Probation, couples struggling with their adults, children, youth and families information about grant funding. I believe we understand and Victims of marriage, vocation, self- with various psychological, social, should look at the history of the Task Force, cope with Domestic confidence, finances and other emotional, and behavioral challenges. work together, evaluate the Task Force's todays Violence, PTSD areas of their life. I am skilled in counseling individuals effectiveness, and implement successful ideas determining clients, Traumas, with drug and alcohol addictions, and plans The Task Force should oversee the factors. Tragedies, including adolescents in group homes. program, collect date for further information, and Furthermore, I Addictions, In addition, I have worked with evaluate the program's effectiveness every so would like to Crisis, Children victims of domestic violence, low- often, and address any new needs that may arise help with Special income families, the homeless, and within the community. Community needs can individuals Needs, under -served populations, including change often depending on circumstantial define their Behavioral clients with personality disorders (i.e. conditions that may arise. The Task Forces needs problem(s) or Modification, schizophrenia). In the past, I was on a to do everything they can to make sure they are issues(s) Reconstruction preschool board and helped develop providing the community with their much clearly and of the indoor and outdoor environment needed support and guidance. I believe some teach them Communications for preschool. I also helped hire the people within our community need to learn how to , Stress supervisor and teachers. In addition, I positive social development. They need to learn envision the Management, taught preschool for 3 years, and was a how to strengthen their ability to nurture change ideal solution. Social Skills, and youth adviser for 5 years for high and growth, seek and maintain social support Some of my Conflict school kids and middle school kids. networks, and develop helpful coping skills that goals include: Resolution. I will enable them to adapt to their environment. helping promote The Task Force needs to encourage positive individuals Independence parenting skills, and family relationships. The develop social and Self Task Force should work with the school districts skills, as they Advocacy. I to make sure every child's educational need are learn to provide Career No. Name City of Temecula Resident Y/N? Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: being met. I also believe that the Task Force strengthen their Counseling and needs to work together, find out what types of ability to Professional activities children, adolescents, and teens enjoy nurture change Development, and come up with a plan with the help of various and growth, Help with Loss companies and non-profit organizations and seek and and Grief, and develop after school programs that fits their maintain social Individuals in interest and encourages their excitement. They support Transition. I need an outlet from their everyday stresses both networks, and have at home and at school. The more things they develop helpful extraordinary have to choose form the less time they will have coping skills knowledge of to get into trouble and associate with people how that will enable Alternative to may be a bad influence. The Task Force should them to adapt Domestic look at transportation options for the kids in to their Violence (ADV) school including transportation for kids who environment, and I am a strong want to participate in an after school program. encourage advocate for The Task Force should provide education, and positive victims of help people within the community build parenting domestic awareness about important issues as they relate skills, family violence. I am to children, adolescents, teens and teens at risk, relationships, also a single as well as families. Bullying and health and and social mother of two family issues should also be addressed. The Task development. I beautiful Force should provide education and resources would like to children; an 18- related to these matters. As a volunteer Marriage assist year -old girl and and Family Therapist Inter at Sigil Social, I am individuals, a 13-year-old planning on starting up several different types of families, and son. My groups. On in particular is called "is My couples experience also Relationship Health/Understanding Domestic struggling with includes working Violence." This group will be open to anyone their marriage, with adults, who is interested, especially teens so they can be vocation, self- children, youth educated about domestic violence and help them confidence, and families with have better insight into how healthy their finances and various No. Name City of Temecula Resident Y/N? Why are you interested in participating on the Local Task Force Committee? Why do you feel that you are qualified to serve on the Local Task Force Committee? What ideas and perspectives will you bring in order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? How many hours per week/month on average are you willing to commit to the Task Force? Please check one of the following areas that you feel best qualifies you to serve on the local task force committee: relationship are with their friend(s) and current other areas of psychological, boyfriend/girlfriend. If the group has a good mix their life. social, between teens and adults, I may start a group for emotional, and separate groups. Eventually, I plan on starting up behavioral support groups for parents and teens. Parenting challenges. I am group topics will include but not limited to: skilled in Positive parenting skills, setting healthy counseling boundaries for their children/teens, support for individuals with single parents, and assistance in developing drug and alcohol behavioral modification plans, positive addictions, parent/child/teen relationships and healthy including family relationships. Other groups I intend to adolescents in start consist of a support group for parents with group homes. In children with special needs, a support group for addition, I have children with special needs and their siblings, worked with and career counseling and professional victims of development. Once I develop these programs and domestic decide on a date to start, I plan on handing out violence, low - fliers to people in my neighborhood, people income families, within the community, and people throughout the homeless, the city. I also plan to educate and provide fliers and under -served for community health care providers, other non- populations, profit organizations, including faith -based faith- including clients based organizations, schools districts, and with personality individual high schools, middle schools, and disorders (i.e. colleges. I want to be able to reach out to as schizophrenia). many people as possible, especially teenagers. I In the past, I was also would like to attend various community on a preschool events, which will give me the opportunity to board and helped educate and inform people within the community develop the about important issues within the community and indoor and No. Name City of Why are you interested in Why do you feel that you are What ideas and perspectives will you bring in How many Please check Temecula participating on the Local Task qualified to serve on the Local Task order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? hours per one of the Resident Force Committee? Force Committee? week/month following areas Y/N? on average are that you feel you willing to best qualifies commit to the you to serve on Task Force? the local task force committee: address their own personal needs. I will also be outdoor able to pass out fliers and provide information environment for about other events and invite them to attend a preschool. I also group that relates to them personally. This will helped hire the also give me the change to receive feedback supervisor and about special needs within the community that teachers. In have not been addressed. addition, I taught preschool for 3 years, and was a youth adviser for 5 years for high school kids and middle school kids. 16 Novell, Ben No/Murri Desire to improve quality of life Deputy Probation Officer for Perspective of challenges facing families within 1-2 hours Other: eta in the Temecula community. To Riverside County 1981-1988. Mental community ranging from parenting issues to weekly Community In lieu of Ben continue our collaboration with Health provider in Temecula since violence in the home to working with abused Mental Health Novell: Liza the City of Temecula. Our 1989. Past board member for children. Organization Liza Vega- Vega- collaboration includes: Alternatives to Domestic Violence. Tallman, Tallman: Educational Series for Parents & Currently provide services for clinical, Community Yes Caregivers (Special Needs family law and Juvenile Courts. Outreach Series), Gaming Addiction Provider for CPS & County Mental Director Business Information Series, and just added Health. Address participation with the City's (City) Youth Advisory Council, Temecula providing presentations to youth ages 14-18. 17 Owens, Robin Yes I believe my background working 24.5 years of experience working with I have an open perspective and experience to I am open at Youth Serving for CDCR, Division of Juvenile youth, youthful offenders with the work collaboratively within the scope and this time but 2- Organizations, Justice & Adult Divisions has state and local sports organizations in mission of the committee in the areas of 4 hours per Other: 24.5 yrs. given me a unique prospective Riverside county. mentoring, at -risk youth, counseling, suicide week to start. employed with No. Name City of Why are you interested in Why do you feel that you are What ideas and perspectives will you bring in How many Please check Temecula participating on the Local Task qualified to serve on the Local Task order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? hours per one of the Resident Force Committee? Force Committee? week/month following areas Y/N? on average are that you feel you willing to best qualifies commit to the you to serve on Task Force? the local task force committee: Business that will be beneficial to this prevention, and counseling. CDCR, Div. Address committee as it relates to positive Juv.Justice & (City) outcomes. Div. Adult Temecula Institutions 18 Perry, Mark S. Yes I personally agree the City Living in Temecula and being a part I believe Temecula struggles with growth that I would need a Faith -Based Growth has been fast, but the City of the City's growth since 1996, I have has left a gap in the community understanding of better Organization Business Plan still has covered the seen the changes first hand. Being everything the City has to offer. My strength in understanding Address construction of programs, involved with Community Service Project Management, Marketing and Community of the depth of (City) facilities and outlet sources projects as well as working as a Real Involvement offer the Task Force an experienced the projects Temecula needed. I would love the Estate Agent I have built a large shoulder to work with. being opportunity to support the City's network of resources that could add requested. I next steps in building a better use value to this project. would believe of these resources. a lot of these projects would be simply an extension of my current volunteer work within the community already. 19 Stott, Deanne No/Coron As a health care professional While I am not a healthcare I will bring ideas regarding the dangers and the It will vary Youth Serving ado whose organization specializes in professional, I am the liaison to the emotional impact that many of the activities teen based upon the Organization pediatric and adolescent health resources, especially educational engage in can have. I can provide educational project or task. Business and wellness, I am passionate resources, which could prove resources that could be of help to the Task Force. I will be Address about developing plans to educate beneficial to the creation and I can work to recruit speakers, if desired, who available to (City) the youth of Temecula of the implementation of the plans that are could educate the community on the various attend San dangers of alcohol and drug use, developed by the Task Force. Rady emotional challenges that today's youth and meetings and Diego and promiscuity and sexual activities, Children's Hospital has departments teens are faced with. help plan Murrieta bullying, violence and social such as the Chadwick Center, CAPS events or media dangers. As a mom of three (Child and Adolescent Psychiatry implement the No. Name City of Why are you interested in Why do you feel that you are What ideas and perspectives will you bring in How many Please check Temecula participating on the Local Task qualified to serve on the Local Task order to fulfill the mission of the Task Force? hours per one of the Resident Force Committee? Force Committee? week/month following areas Y/N? on average are that you feel you willing to best qualifies commit to the you to serve on Task Force? the local task force committee: teenagers who were raised in Services), Infectious Disease Division, plans necessary Temecula and a former substitute Eating Disorders Clinic, Autism to reach the for the Temecula Unified School Discovery Institute and the Gender objectives of District, I recognize and the need Management Clinic which could the Task Force. for programs to help adolescents provide valuable educational I am available and teens cope with the pressures resources. Also, as a mom of three to up to 3 hours that surround them. One of my teens I have seen a lot and know first- per week but offices is located in that region hand the pressures that teens today are more if needed. and therefore, I am tied to many faced with and appreciate the many of the families who reside there. resources that my organization has for Additionally, of the children from parents. the southern Riverside region who require hospitalization, approximately 47% are patients of RCHSD. We serve a great deal of families in the community and despite living in San Diego, I am still very connected. 20 Venittelli, No/Wine I teach special education at I hold a teaching certificate for both I have been trained to involve all stakeholders in I can spend 3 TVUSD (K-12) Mary Country Chaparral High School and have English and Special Education. I hold the decision -making process. I'm a listener, a hours/week on seen many young people with a Master's degree in Educational speaker, and a problem -solver. Task Force Business many needs that our community Administration. I have lived/taught in work. Address can help. Temecula 10 years. (City) Temecula 21 Willcox, Alex Yes I see what is happening in the I have helped with multiple special I am immersed in the problem culture everyday, I can commit TVUSD (K-12) community to teenagers and want needs projects, I am a leader and my which will allow me to detect problems and two to four to be their voice for help. increased maturity puts teen problems determine if the solutions are having an effect. hours a week. into a new light. City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety Planning Framework Introduction The Crisis Today, teens face a wide variety of social issues which affect their physical and emotional well- being. The stresses and challenges our teens are facing have made them more vulnerable and susceptible to destructive and dangerous behaviors. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports the following statistics amongst our youth: • 21.9% of students had had five or more drinks of alcohol in a row (i.e., within a couple of hours) on at least 1 day during the 30 days before the survey (i.e., binge drinking) • 47.4% of students had had sexual intercourse • 15.8% of students had seriously considered attempting suicide • 16.2% of students had been electronically bullied, including being bullied through e-mail, chat rooms, instant messaging, web sites, or texting • 32.8% of students had been in a physical fight one or more times With these alarming statistics, communities must act to address these issues not only regionally but locally within their own communities. According to the City of Temecula Youth Master Plan — Environmental Scan Summary, the challenges and major concerns specifically affecting Temecula's youth are drugs and alcohol, peer pressure, public safety, difficult relationships, lack of things to do and shortage in transportation options to stay active in extracurricular activities. Background The Temecula Youth Master Plan (2008) states, "Temecula's youth are valued as the future of our community. We provide an exciting, positive and supportive environment with a wide range of choices and opportunities that challenge our youth with new experiences. We develop our youth through a well-balanced approach that fosters intellectual, social, spiritual, creative, physical, and emotional growth. Our young people enjoy their youth, and achieve lifelong success as Temecula's adults of tomorrow." With prevalent social issues facing families throughout the country and in our region, specifically in light of developments in technology that pose new social complications, elected City and School District leaders across Southwest Riverside County have formed the Regional Youth, Family and Health Task Force (Regional Task Force) committed to providing our youth, parents and families information and resources to better understand and cope with modern influences. The Regional Task Force is a joint collaboration between City of Temecula, Mayor Naggar and City of Murrieta, Mayor Gibbs. The Regional Task Force shaped a vision that will launch a localized task force, City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety (CCAC-HFS or Local Task Force) which will serve as an action committee to create and develop initiatives that will address issues facing our youth. The Local Task Force will empower members to actively find ways to battle the growing concerns of dangerous teen social issues. The vision of the local City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety will engage its task force members in a shared goal of creating a safer and healthier community for our youth and generations to come. Mission The City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety will take issues, ideas, and programs discussed at the Regional Family, Youth and Health Task Force and disseminate it at a local level amongst Temecula residents. The Local Task Force will serve as a model to other communities/municipalities. This will allow members of the task force an opportunity to zero in on the areas that require the most or immediate attention while still addressing other concerns. Process and Activitie (a). Develop the framework of the Local Task Force (b). Bring the item to City Council for approval and comments (c). Solicit for Local Task Force members and Receive Applications (d). City Council Appointment of Local Task Force Strategic Planning Process Members. The Local Task Force shall act as grass -roots with its mission to spark ideas, share information, identify needs, allocate resources, educate and inform the community, collaborate, partner, and advocate for policy. The appointed grass -roots members will not be elected officials. Each member will be directed specifically toward action by following a set of strategies and/or action plan that will address the issues at hand. A diverse, cross section of community members means more access to different resources, support and eventual success. Number, Duties, Term of Appointment. (a). The affairs and decisions of the City Council Action Committee for Health & Family Safety shall be managed by the Local Task Force and City Council. (b). City of Temecula shall provide staffing resources to coordinate meetings, workshops and serve as a liaison between Local Task Force, City Council, and the community at -large. (c). Applicants will be selected based upon their community interest, enthusiasm to participate, experience, knowledge, commitment, cooperation, and willingness to seek solutions. The Local Task Force may be composed of members from diverse categories including but not limited to those listed below: 1. TVUSD high school students from each high school, appointed by school officials or City Human Services Division 2. Citizens at -large who are parents, appointed by City Council 3. Senior citizens or retired from a youth serving organization, appointed by City Council 4. Civic and/or volunteers from nonprofit organizations, appointed by City Council 5. Members of an organized neighborhood watch or similar program, appointed by City Council 6. Local PTA members, appointed by City Council 7. Youth members of local private/public organizations, appointed by City Council 8. Members of local faith -based organizations, appointed by City Council 9. Members of TVUSD including but not limited to a School Resource Officer, appointed by City Council 10. Members of TVUSD who are counselors or teachers, appointed by City Council (d). The Local Task Force will meet to discuss and find ways to address local social issues as outlined in the framework of the strategic directions. Members will be appointed different roles which may be to study issues, others to bring suggestions/ideas/comments to regional task force, others to take immediate and direct action (setting up interventions, workshops, etc). (e). Each member of the Local Task Force shall serve a one year term. Local Task Force members will provide a bi-annual report (or as needed or requested) to the City Council. Meetings of the Task Force. Members of the Local Task Force are required to attend Local Task Force meetings which would be held at a City facility. Members of the Local Task Force should attend the Regional Task Force meetings to take information back to the local meetings. All meetings of the Local Task Force will be public meetings subject to the Brown Act. Strategies and Actions Strategies were identified to achieve the goals and outcomes of the Regional Youth, Family, and Health Task Force. These set of strategies are also outlined in the Temecula Youth Master Plan. The following are the recommended strategies for action to be performed by Local Task Force members. 1. Community Education and Awareness — members of the task force will educate and inform the community about important issues as they relate to youth and families. 2. Create Organized Programs, Activities, and Services — provide, facilitate, collaborate and partner to encourage programs, activities, and services to better engage youth. 3. Build new and expand existing partnerships — partnerships among public and private sector organizations to leverage resources, leverage funds and bridge gaps in services. In order to respond and address these threats to our youth, a set of strategic actions have been identified. All actions are set to achieve the task force vision and desired outcomes. a. Distribute information to all channels (City, community health care providers, non -profits, school districts, neighborhoods, faith -based organizations, etc.). b. Attend community events for opportunities to educate and inform the community through presentations, information booths and meetings. c. Partner with organizations to host workshops and events that draw awareness, offer resources, provide information and education. d. Develop curricula and information for training and educating schools, business and youth serving organizations that support the betterment of youth. e. Develop workshops, activities geared towards youth and families. These outcomes will result from the efforts of the Local Task Force that will protect and keep youth safe, prepare youth for their future, improve communities, and build stronger families. Item No. 8 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director �2 City Manager (sJ� CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Community Services Director DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Corporate Sponsorship Draft Policy (at the request of Finance Committee Members Mike Naggar and Chuck Washington) PREPARED BY: Roberto Cardenas, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Corporate Sponsorship Program in substantial form and authorize the City Manager to make administrative modifications as necessary. BACKGROUND: Amid challenging economic times, it is important for local government to collaborate with businesses to allow those businesses to support services offered to the community. The City of Temecula's proposed Corporate Sponsorship Program offers a variety of ways for businesses to achieve this while simultaneously reaching their business goals. The assistance of corporate sponsorships enables the continuation (and possible expansion) of service opportunities in the City. On March 12, August 13, and November 12 of 2013 staff met with the Finance Committee to propose, discuss, and enhance the Corporate Sponsorship Program. Thereby, the policy adopted in the Corporate Sponsorship Program lays the foundational principles that corporate sponsors must abide by if they wish to participate in the program. More specifically, it is the policy of the City of Temecula that: § Corporate sponsorships support the City's Mission Statement; § Corporate sponsorships advance the Six Core Values identified in the City's Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP); § Corporate sponsorship agreements (and agreements where City contractors solicit corporate sponsorships) exist in accordance with guidelines and procedures set forth in this policy; § Corporate sponsorships do not result in any loss of City administrative rights, jurisdiction or authority; § The City provide sponsors with suitable acknowledgement of their contributions; § City does not knowingly compete for corporate sponsorship funds typically earmarked to support existing services and/or programs provided by local non-profit organizations; In appreciation of sponsorship support, the program provides sponsors with suitable acknowledgement of their contributions. Although sponsorship support does not have a monetary limit, all sponsors will receive special recognition based on the level of support, for example: RECOGNITION EXAMPLE LEVEL AMOUNT RECOGNITION Basic In -kind to § Sponsor name will be listed on website under sponsors tab. $100 The above, plus: Bronze $101 to § Sponsor name and logo will be listed on a sign posted at an $500 activity area, and remain throughout the duration of the event. All of the above, plus: Silver $501 to § Sponsor's name or logo will appear on Sponsor provided $1,000 "walk-aways" (e.g. pens, bracelets, key chains, etc.) distributed at an event. All of the above, plus: Gold $1,001 to § Sponsor name will be listed in all press releases and logo will $5,000 be displayed on publications, posters, website, and other marketing material (as applicable). § Ability to use City property for product sampling. All of the above, plus: Platinum $5,001 § Title sponsorship of the event (if applicable). and above § Designation as the "official," exclusive, or preferred community partner. § Sponsor recognition on the radio. On Tuesday, November 12, 2013, the Finance Committee recommended the item be forwarded to Council for consideration. The Finance Committee also discussed various means and methods of securing Corporate Sponsorships including: 1) creating a new staff position to seek out and secure sponsorships, 2) a cooperative/collaborative effort between existing City Staff and the Convention and Visitors Bureau and 3) entering into a contractual arrangement with a professional sponsorship lobbyist. The City Attorney has opined that the government code prohibits a local agency from establishing a position that would be self -funded using proceeds of sponsorships. Given the economic climate and the City's desire to collaborate with businesses to allow those businesses to support services offered to the community, staff recommends that the City approve the Corporate Sponsorship Program. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff anticipates revenue generated from the Corporate Sponsorship Program will offset costs for services and/or programs offered to the community. Proceeds from this program will be deposited in the General Fund and will be used to reduce the annual General Fund contribution to TCSD activities. ATTACHMENTS: City of Temecula Corporate Sponsorship Program City of Temecula Corporate Sponsorship Program Introduction Amid challenging economic times, it is important for local government to collaborate with businesses to allow those businesses to support services offered to the community. The City of Temecula's Corporate Sponsorship Program (CSP) offers a variety of ways for businesses to achieve this while simultaneously reaching their business goals. The assistance of corporate sponsorships enables the continuation (and possible expansion) of service opportunities in the City. Purpose The City welcomes CSP opportunities that enhance the City's ability to deliver services as long as the services and products are consistent with (and appropriate to) the City's Mission Statement. Therefore, the CSP policy is established to: ■ Outline the guidelines and procedures for entering into corporate sponsorship agreements; ■ Assist potential sponsors to understand the opportunities and constraints of corporate sponsorships; ■ Recognize that corporate sponsorships provide an effective means of generating new revenues and alternative resources to support the City's facilities and programs. Policy The policy adopted in the CSP lays the foundational principles that corporate sponsors must abide by if they wish to participate in the program. It is the policy of the City of Temecula that: ■ Corporate sponsorships support the City's Mission Statement; ■ Corporate sponsorships advance the Six Core Values identified in the City's Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP); ■ Corporate sponsorship agreements (and agreements where City contractors solicit corporate sponsorships) exist in accordance with guidelines and procedures set forth in this policy; ■ Corporate sponsorships do not result in any loss of City administrative rights, jurisdiction or authority; ■ The City provide sponsors with suitable acknowledgement of their contributions; ■ City does not knowingly compete for corporate sponsorship funds typically earmarked to support existing services and/or programs provided by local non-profit organizations; This policy applies to: ■ All relationships between the City and businesses, organizations, and individuals that contribute either financially or in -kind to City hosted events, City sponsored events, special events (including live performances, concerts, and programs), community projects, services, or facilities in return for recognition, public acknowledgement, or other promotional considerations, including paid advertising on City property, at City events, and in City publications. 2 Exclusions to Corporate Sponsorship Policy: This policy does not apply to: ■ Gifts, grants or unsolicited donations in which no benefits are granted to the corporation and where no business relationship exists; ■ Sponsorships determined through a good faith effort to be unique and without interested competitors. Definitions: ■ Advertising - Advertising is signage or personal collateral created by the corporate entity (usually placed in designated areas) to promote a product or service; ■ Corporate — Any individual, group, for -profit, or not -for -profit entity interested in sponsoring the City (either in -kind or direct funding); ■ Corporate Sponsorship - Corporate Sponsorship is defined as local government collaborating with businesses (corporate) to support services offered by the local government to the community (while simultaneously achieving each sponsor's business goals). ■ Gift/Grant/Unsolicited Donation - A gift, grant, or unsolicited donation (GGU) is freely given goods, cash, or real property to the City, with no expectation of a return. GGUs may be designated for a specific purpose or may be general in nature. Recognition, if any, is determined by the City; ■ Mission Statement: The mission of the City of Temecula is to maintain a safe, secure, clean, healthy, and orderly community; to balance the utilization of open space, parks, trail facilities, quality jobs, public transportation, diverse housing, and adequate infrastructure; and to enhance and revitalize historic areas. The City will encourage programs for all age groups, utilize its human resources, and preserve its natural resources while stimulating technology, promoting commerce, and utilizing sound fiscal policy. It is the City Council's resolve that this mission will instill a sense of pride and accomplishment in its citizens and that the City will be known as a progressive, innovative, balanced, and environmentally sensitive community. ■ Naming Rights Sponsorship - Naming rights are a financial transaction and form of advertising whereby a corporation or other entity purchases the right to name a facility, event, or component of an event, typically for a defined period of time. ■ Quality of Life Master Plan Six Core Values: ■ Healthy and Livable Community ■ Economic Prosperity ■ A Safe and Prepared Community ■ Transportation Mobility and Connectivity ■ A Sustainable City ■ Accountable and Responsible City Government Criteria Sponsorship Consideration: Sponsorship of funds or in -kind services (e.g. contributions of staff, equipment, services, booth participation, bottled water, promotional items, etc.) will be considered for City hosted events, City sponsored events, special events (including live 3 performances, concerts, and programs), community projects, services, or facilities designed to accomplish all of the following goals and objectives: 1. Adhere to the City's Mission Statement; 2. Promote the City as a desirable place to live, visit, do business and/or bring tourism - associated revenue to the City; 3. Advance the Six Core Values identified in the City's Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) to enhance the well-being of the residents; 4. Promote a family -friendly environment. Restrictions on Sponsorship In general, the following industries and products are not eligible for corporate sponsorship with the City of Temecula: 1. Religious and political organizations; 2. Parties who are currently involved in a law suit adverse to the City; 3. Parties involved in any stage of negotiations for a City contract unless contract is directly linked to a corporate sponsorship opportunity; 4. Parties that engage in uses or activities prohibited by the Municipal Code. 5. Businesses that create a conflict of interest for the City. CSP Levels of Support In appreciation of sponsorship support, it is the City's policy to provide sponsors with suitable acknowledgement of their contributions. Sponsorship support does not have a monetary limit. All sponsors will receive special recognition based on the level of support (designated by the department director). A suggested example is shown below: LEVEL Basic I Bronze Silver Gold Platinum AMOUNT I RECOGNITION EXAMPLES In -kind to ■ Sponsor name will be listed on website under sponsors tab. $100 The above, plus: $101 to Sponsor name and logo will be listed on a sign posted at an activity area, $500 and remain throughout the duration of the event. All of the above, plus: $501 to Sponsor's name or logo will appear on Sponsor provided "walk-aways" $1,000 (e.g. pens, bracelets, key chains, etc.) distributed at an event. All of the above, plus: $1,001 to ■ Sponsor name will be listed in all press releases and logo will be displayed $5,000 on publications, posters, website, and other marketing material (as applicable). ■ Ability to use City property for product sampling. All of the above, plus: $5,001 ■ Title sponsorship of the event (if applicable). and ■ Designation as the "official," exclusive, or preferred community partner. above ■ Sponsor recognition on the radio. 4 Recognition of Sponsor: The following principles form the basis of the City's Recognition of Sponsors: ■ Recognition shall not detract from the visitor's experience or expectations; ■ Recognition shall not impair the visual qualities of the site; ■ Recognition of a sponsorship shall not suggest in any way the endorsement of the sponsor's goods or services by City, or any proprietary interest of the sponsor in the City; ■ Any physical form of on -site recognition shall not interfere with visitor use or routine City operations. The form of any on -site recognition shall be of an appropriate size and color, adhere to municipal codes on advertisement, shall not detract from the City surroundings or any interpretive message, and must not compromise design standards or the visual integrity of City facilities; ■ All sponsorship agreements will be for a defined period of time having regard to the value of the sponsorship and the life of the asset being sponsored. Procedure The following procedures lay out the processes that both the prospective sponsor and the City must follow in order to provide sponsorship. Initiation ■ Sponsorships are arranged primarily through three processes: 1. Self -initiated by the potential sponsor via the completion of a Corporate Sponsorship Interest Form (See Attachment A Sample) and adherence to the terms and conditions outlined in the Corporate Sponsorship Agreement (See Attachment D Sample). 2. City -initiated via the distribution of a Sponsorship Application Packet (See Attachment B Sample) and adherence to the terms and conditions outlined in the Corporate Sponsorship Agreement (See Attachment D Sample). 3. City -initiated via a Request for Corporate Sponsorship Proposal (RFCSP) process (See Attachment C Sample) and adherence to the terms and conditions outlined in the Corporate Sponsorship Agreement (See Attachment D Sample). o RFCSP Process • The City shall solicit Corporate Sponsorships via a RFCSP process (See Attachment C Sample). • All proposals for sponsorships must be submitted in writing to the City per the instructions outlined in the Request for Corporate Sponsorship Proposal document. • Staff will review the submitted proposals, provide comments, and provide a recommendation to the City Manager. ■ Corporate Sponsorship Approval Process o Corporate Sponsorship solicitations and submissions shall be administered by each department. 5 o The City Manager's Department shall provide technical support and oversight to the Corporate Sponsorship Program. o The City Manager's Department shall have the prerogative to accept or reject any proposals submitted by corporate sponsors. o The City Manager (or designee) is authorized to enter into Corporate Sponsorship Agreements in any dollar amount. o The City Manager shall seek approval from City Council on proposed corporate sponsorships involving the naming of events and/or facilities. o At the end of each fiscal year, the City Manager (or designee) shall disclose to City Council all corporate sponsorship agreements, including the name of the corporate sponsorship opportunity, the name of the corporate sponsor, and the amount of the corporate sponsorship. Evaluation Criteria The City shall adhere to CSP policy, guidelines, and procedures when evaluating a corporate sponsorship proposal. In all cases, the City shall consider: ■ The City's Mission Statement; ■ The sponsor's past record of involvement in community and City projects; ■ The desirability of association — the image; ■ The timeliness or readiness of the corporate sponsor to enter into an agreement; ■ The actual value in cash, or in -kind goods or services of the proposal in relation to the benefit to the corporation; ■ Community support for, or opposition to, the proposal; ■ The operating and maintenance costs associated with the proposal; ■ The corporation's record of responsible environmental stewardship. 0 Attachment A Sample Corporate Sponsorship Interest Form Please fill out each question completely and accurately: First and Last Name Business Name (if applicable): Business Registration/License Number (if applicable) Street Address C ity_ State Zip Code Phone Email Address (if applicable Sponsorship Proposal Description: Provide a description of the proposed financial (or in -kind) sponsorship including its rationale and any positive financial, environmental, social or cultural benefit the sponsorship will provide to the city. Please be as complete as possible. Sponsorship Estimate/Cost: Please estimate the cost of your financial or in -kind sponsorship, the source of your funding (marketing expense, cooperative marketing funds, corporate gifting, etc.), and how you arrived at your funding figure. Sponsor's Businesses Activities: If applicable, please insert a brief description of the nature of your business. Sponsorship Rights and Recognition: Please insert a brief description of the level of recognition your business desires. Attachment B Sample Sponsorship Application Packet The City of Temecula is planning a spectacular year. We need your support! We invite your business to become a sponsor of the Corporate Sponsorship Program. Below are levels and events for your review. SPONSRSHIP LEVELS Bronze Sponsor- In -Kind ■ [Insert Recognition, e.g. Sponsor name will be listed on a sign posted at an activity area, and remain throughout the duration.] Silver Sponsor $1,000 [Insert Recognition, e.g. Banners, walk-aways (e.g. pens, bracelets, key chains, etc.) at an event with a sponsor name or logo.] Gold Sponsor $5,000 ■ [Insert Recognition, e.g. Corporate logo included in publications websit6] Platinum Sponsor $ 10,000 ■ [Insert Recognition, e.g. Corporate visibility in public parks and facilities] City of Temecula Sponsorship Opportunities [ Insert Event [Insert [Insert [Insert [Insert [Insert Event] e.g. Hot Event] Event] Event] Event] Summer Nights] [insert Location Location e.g. Crowne Hill Park] Date [Insert Date] Estimated Attendahc [Insert Figure] Basic Sponsor In -Kind Bronze Sponsor [e.g. $500] Silver Sponsor [e.g. $1,000] The City of Temecula is legally a qualified charitable beneficiary. The Federal Tax Identification Number for the City of Temecula is: [Insert Federal Tax ID Number] all charitable donations may be tax deductible to the extent allowed by law. Please consult a tax professional for more information. Gold Sponsor [e.g. $5,000] Platinum [e.g. $10,000] Sponsor Thank you for your interest in the City of Temecula Corporate Sponsorship Program. Please fill out and submit the Sponsorship Form below. If you should have any questions, please call [Insert Contact] Your Contact Information Date: Company name/Organization Contact person Mailinq Address _ Street Address Company Phone Cell or Alternate Phone Fax: _ Email Address: Website Address: Name of Events (check _one): Alternate Event: Sponsorship Level (Check one) Total Sponsorship Amount: In -Kind Donation Fair IDDescription-. arket Value: Payment Options (Circle one): Visa or MasterCard Payment: Send Payment: Phone Registration Fax Form: Loao Information Terms and Conditions Event & Payment Information [Insert Event e.g. Hot Summer Nights] nsert Alternate Event] Bronze Silver Gold Platinum Insert Am0U( [Insert Value] [Insert Description] Check: Payable to City of Temecula Cash Credit Card Card Number: Expiration Date: 3 Digit Security Code: Printed Name on Card: Siqnature: Attachment C CITY OF TEMECULA CALIFORNIA SAMPLE REQUEST FOR CORPRORATE SPONSORSHIP PROPOSALS (RFCSP) [ INSERT NAME OF PROJECT] I. � Kbr,- +-v. Filing Deadline: [Insert Date] at [Insert Time] CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] INTRODUCTION A. The City of Temecula, hereinafter referred to as the City, is requesting corporate sponsorship proposals from firms or individuals to provide [Insert type of service: i.e. plan check, surveying, ATM, etc.] services to the City. B. It is the intent of the City to award a [Insert terms: i.e. one (1) year agreement with the option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year terms]. II. CITY PROFILE A. The City of Temecula is a dynamic community comprised of approximately 103,092 citizens of various cultural backgrounds. The City maintains 39 parks on 309 developed acres throughout the community, which provide recreation opportunities for both the citizens of Temecula, s well as surrounding communities. Contracted services provided through Riverside County include police and fire protection. The Temecula Valley Unified School District provides 34 schools for 28,671 students at the kindergarten through 12th grade levels within the City. The City of Temecula prides itself on its community focus and quality of life. III. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. INSERT SCOPE: A quality contract begins with a solid RFCSP. An RFCSP (via the Scope of Services) outlines what the City "needs" — then it's up to the Proponent to "propose" their services (via their proposal). A poorly crafted Scope of Service makes it very difficult for Proponents to determine the City's needs. In addition, a poorly written Scope of Service makes it difficult for the Selection Panel to properly evaluate the services being offered by the Proponents. IV. LOCAL VENDOR PREFERENCE PROGRAM - SERVICES A. It is the policy of the City to promote employment and business opportunities for local residents and firms on all contracts and give preference to local residents, workers, businesses, vendors, contractors, and consultants to the extent consistent with the law and interest of the public. B: The City of Temecula Local Vendor Preference is applicable to this Soliciation pursuant to Chapter 3.28 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A five percent (5%) preference will be given to Local Vendors in the determination for award of this contract. C. Qualified vendors, contractors, or consultants (Vendors) that desire consideration as a City of Temecula Local Vendor under this solicitation must complete the "Statement of Local Vendor Certification" (contained herein as Exhibit C) and submit it as part of their solicitation response. Late submittals of the Statement of Local Vendor Certification will not be considered. Submission of this statement will qualify the Vendor for treatment as a Local Vendor for purposes of this solicitation only. The statement made under this solicitation shall not qualify the Vendor as a Local Vendor under any other solicitation. CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] V. PROPONENT INFORMATION A. RFCSP Proposal Timeline: The following is the City's tentative schedule for the selection of a Proponent: RFCSP Proponents Electronically Notified Insert Date] Deadline for Submitting Questions Insert Date & Time (At Least3Day. f..Deadline) Deadline for Submitting Proposals [Insert Date and Time] (At Least2Weeks) Panel Review of Pro osals Tentative Insert Date Interview of Top Proponents Insert Date Notice of Intent to Award Sent to Proponents Insert Date Council Approval and Award Tentative Insert Date Begin Services (Tentative) Insert Date B. Proponent Information Conference: A [mandatory/non-mandatory] Proponents Information Conference will be held at [InsertAddress], on [Insert Date], at [Insert Time] to explain service requirements and to answer questions regarding Scope of Services, completion of proposals, time frames, and the RFCSP process. C. Oral Interview: Those Proponents considered most qualified to provide the required services may be requested to participate in an oral interview at the City's discretion. Applicants will be notified in writing of the time and place for the interview. It is expected that key members of the engagement team (owner, partner, manager, senior personnel, and project manager) will be present for the presentation/interview process. Failure to appear for the oral interview will be cause to disqualify the firm from further consideration. VI. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION of PROPOSAL A. Registering as a Vendor: Proponents must be registered as a vendor with the City to download the RFCSP document(s) and to submit a proposal. If not already registered, Proponents may "Register As A Vendor" via the City's website: http://purchasing.cityoftemecula.org. B. [Insert the following paragraph if documents must be uploaded onto PlanetBids] Documents must be uploaded in PDF format. It is the Proponent's responsibility to ensure their proposal documents are properly uploaded onto the City's online bid management system. Proposals that are missing pages, cannot be opened, etc. may be considered unresponsive. Hard copies submitted to the City, in lieu, of an electronic copies uploaded onto the system, will not be accepted as a viable proposal. C. It is the Proponent's sole responsibility to contact the City's online bid management provider (PlanetBids at 818-992-1771) to resolve any technical issues related to electronic bidding, including (but not limited to) registering as a vendor, updating passwords, updating profiles, uploading/downloading documents, submitting an electronic bid/proposal, etc. D. Submittal of Proposal and Fee Schedule: It is the responsibility of the candidate to ensure the proposal is delivered on time. Any proposal received after the deadline will be disqualified and will not be considered. Proposals sent via facsimile will not be accepted. CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] i. One (1) original and three (3) copies of the proposal, fee schedule, and Statement of Local Vendor Certification must be submitted in hardcopy format and in a sealed envelope marked "[Insert Name of Project]" to the following address no later than [Insert Date] at [Insert Time]: Via U.S. Mail Walk -In Delivery or Courier City of Temecula Service Attn: City Clerk City of Temecula P O Box 9033 Attn: City Clerk Temecula, CA 92589- 41000 Main Street 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 E. Examination of the Content of the RFCSP: By submitting a proposal, the Proponent represents that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the contents of the RFCSP and that it is capable of performing quality work to achieve the City objectives. The submission of a signed proposal shall be considered an agreement to all the terms, conditions, and specifications provided in the RFCSP. i. Sample Agreement: A sample Agreement=is attached,(5xhibit B) for the purpose of informing the proposer of the fixed, predetermined, standard contract provisions with which they will be "required to comply. These provisions are `subject to revision by the City at any time prior to the signing of the agreement. ii. Exceptions: If the :Proponent suggests alternatives or states exceptions to any term or condition in the Agreement, or to any provision or recurrent of the RFCSP, such alternative or exception shall be clearly stated and identified in the submitted proposal. Otherwise, the successful Proponent will be expected to sign the Agreement upon award of the contract. Any alternative proposed must satisfy all minimum qualifications specified in the RFCSP. The City expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to (1) reject a proposal containing any exception or alternatives as non -conforming, 'or (2) accept any proposal alternative or exception and to award a contract based there on if determined to be in the best interest- of the City. iii. Proposal Signature: The proposal must be signed by an official authorized to, bind the firm. iv. Questions: Any questions, interpretations, or clarifications about any portion of this RFCSP must be requested in writing (by the deadline indicated in the RFCSP Proposal Timeline) [Insert: "via the City's on-line bid management system — PlanetBids." For solicitations not on PlanetBids use the following language: "to [Insert Name and Title] via the following e-mail address: [Insert E-mail Address])." All written questions will be answered in writing and conveyed to all proposers in writing via PlanetBids. Oral explanations or instructions will not bind the City. F. Proposal Withdrawal: Proponent agrees that failure on its part to list all cost components related to the service will not be accepted by the City as an acceptable justification to re -quote the proposal. Proponent acknowledges that CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] the original proposal and costs provided stand. However, Proponent has the option of withdrawing a proposal at any time until a final Contract is awarded. Any withdrawn proposals will not be considered for re -submittal. G. Proposal Content: i. Qualifications and Experience: Proponent shall — 1. Provide the number of years their firm has provided the services outlined in the RFCSP. 2. Provide the name of the principal or project manager in the firm who will have direct and continued responsibility for the project. This person will be the City staff contact on all matters dealing with the project and will handle the day-to-day activities through completion. 3. Provide a resume for all staff/employees assigned to the project (identified in this RFCSP) along with a clear indication of their responsibilities for this project. 4. Provide at least five (5) references that have purchased similar services from th6�'Proponent. 'Or"bponent shall provide company name, contact name, and phone number for each reference. 5. Identify those services that will be outsourced to a sub -contractor. The Proponent will be responsible for verifying the experience, qualifications and validity of all licenses, permits, and copyrights for any outsourced work to sub -contractors. The Proponent is also responsible for paying its employees and any sub -contractors the Proponent hires. 6. Proponent shall identify, obtain, and provide any and all licenses, permits, clearances, reports, and documents required to complete the project and perform the services within required timelines. 7. Provide an outline of its business safety record. Proponent will be required to comply with all existing Federal, State, and CAL OSHA laws and requirements. 8. provide a list any litigation, including personal and property, involving Proponent's firm in the last five (5) years. ii. Technical Approach and Timeline: Proponent shall provide a detailed written outline of their firms proposed approach and timeline to the project and'the tasks the firm undertakes prior to and during the project to ensure its completion and success. iii. Price: A Pricing Form is attached as Exhibit A. Proponent shall provide its proposed fee schedule (pricing) for all services and product in a separate sealed envelope. If there are discrepancies between services, labor, product, materials, or fees the City reserves the right to clarify pricing with the affected Proponent. iv. Statement of Local Vendor Certification: Qualified vendors, contractors , or consultants (Vendors) that desire consideration as a City of Temecula Local Vendor under this solicitation must complete the "Statement of CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] Local Vendor Certification" (contained herein as Exhibit C) and submit it as part of their solicitation response. VII. SELECTION CRITERIA A. The City will establish a proposal Selection Panel whose members must have no conflict of interest with any Proponent. Individual Selection Panel members will review and evaluate the proposals and qualifications of all responsive Proponents. The Selection Panel may be comprised of City staff and/or other people with related expertise. B. The Selection Panel will consider the following factors (and other reasonable, objective, and accountable factors) which are listed here without implication of priority: L Responsiveness: The Proponent's ability to effectively meet the Scope of Services and all the requirements stipulated in the. RFCSP. ii. Qualifications and Experience:` The Proponent's capability and qualifications to perform the Scope of Services and all the requirements stipulated in the RFCSP: iii. Technical Approach and Timeline: The Proponent's method to effectively provide the Scope of Services and all the requirements stipulated in the RFCSP within a reasonable timeline: iv. Price: The Proponent's ability to cost effectively meet the Scope of Services and all the requirements stipulated in the RFCSP. v_ Local Vendor Preference: A five percent (5%) preference will be given to Local Vendors in the determination for award of this contract. C. Contract Award: A final Contract will be awarded to the best qualified individual or firm with the most -cost effective (competitively priced) proposal. Although price is of prime consideration, it is not the sole determining factor. The City reserves the right to select the appropriate firm based on the most qualified proposal. L The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all responses and proposals received in response to this RFCSP, to waive minor irregularities, to negotiate with any qualified source, or cancel in whole or in "part this RFCSP if it is in the best interest of the City to do so, and to take all proposals under advisement for a period of ninety (90) days. If a Contract cannot be negotiated the City reserves the right to negotiate with any other finalist. H. Subsequent to contract negotiations, prospective Proponents may be required to submit revisions to their proposal. iii. This RFCSP does not commit the City to award a Contract, to pay any cost incurred in preparation of a proposal, or to procure or contract for supplies or services. iv. The City reserves the right to select a Proponent to perform all the work identified in the RFCSP, or only selected portions based on price and other factors. CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] v. The City may, at its sole discretion, award the contract in whole, or in part, to one or more Proponents. vi. All companies submitting a proposal should note that the execution of any contract pursuant to this RFCSP is dependent upon the recommendation of the Selection Panel and may be subject to the approval of the City of Temecula City Council. D. Protest Procedures: Pursuant to Chapter 3.28.350 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code, any actual or prospective bidder, proposer, or contractor (collectively "bidder") who believes he or she has been aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or award of a contract pursuant to this Chapter may protest, in writing, to the Office of the City Clerk, within three (3) business days after posting of the award recommendation (posted as "Award Pending" via the City's online bid management system — PlanetBids) at the location where bids or proposals are submitted. The protest shall be deemed filed only when it is actually received by the Office of the City Clerk. Said ' bidder shall refer to Chapter 3.28.350 of the Temecula Municipal Code for detailed filing requirements. The City's municipal code can also be accessed online.at: http:lfwww.cityoftemecula.orglTemeculaJGcsvernment/CityCler'k/MunicipalCodc. htm Vill. CONDITIONS & LEGAL REQUIREMENTS A. Collusion: Any evidence of agreement or, collusion among Proponents, acting illegally to restrain freedom of competition by agreement to propose a fixed price, or otherwise, will render the proposal of such Proponents void. B. City of Temecula Business License: The selected Proponent(s) agree to maintain a City of Temecula business license for the duration of the contract. C. Law Compliance: Selected Proponentis required to comply with all existing State and Federal labor laws. Selected Proponent is also responsible for complying with all OSHA and any other applicable standards and requirements. If Proponent out -sources any work or job to a sub -contractor, it will be the Proponent's responsibility to ensure that all sub -contractors meet the requirements as stated in this RFCSP and Contract award. D. Public Record: All submitted responses, proposals and information included therein shall become public record upon contract award. Proposals are not to be marked as confidential or proprietary. Regardless of any identification otherwise, including marking some or all of the pages as "confidential" or "proprietary," information in proposals shall become part of the public record and subject to disclosure without further notice to the Proponent. The City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such records. CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] EXHIBIT A Pricing Form CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] EXHIBIT B SAMPLE OF STANDARD AGREEMENT (Attached) CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] EXHIBIT C STATEMENT OF LOCAL VENDOR CERTIFICATION Any Vendor claiming to be a Local Vendor, as defined under the Local Vendor Preference Program - Services section of this RFCSP shall so certify in writing to the City. The City shall not be required to verify the accuracy or any such certifications, and shall have sole discretion to determine if a Vendor meets the definition of "Local Vendor." "Local Vendor' means a vendor, contractor, or consultant who has a valid physical business address located within the boundaries of the City of Temecula, at least six months prior to bid or proposal opening date, from which the vendor, contractor, or consultant operates or performs business on a day-to-day basis, and holds a valid business license issued by the City of Temecula and designates, for sales tax purposes, the City of Temecula as the point of sale for retail transactions within the City. Post office boxes are not verifiable and shall not be used for the purpose of establishing such physical address. A business which has obtained City certification as a Local Vendor by reason of having furnished incorrect supporting information or by reason of having withheld information, and which knew or should have known, the information furnished was incorrect or the information withheld was relevant to its request for certification, and which by reason of such certification has been awarded a contract to which it would not otherwise have been entitled, shall: Pay the City any difference within the contract amount and what the City's costs would have been if the contract had been properly awarded. 2. In addition to the amount described in sub section (i) above be assessed a penalty in an amount of not more than ten percent (10%) of the amount of the contract involved; and 3. Be ineligible to transact any business with the City for a period of not less than three (3) months and not more than twenty-four (24) months as determined in the sole discretion of the City Manager. The City Manager shall also have the right to terminate all or any part of any contract entered into with such person or business. CITY OF TEMECULA [Insert Project Name] STATEMENT OF LOCAL VENDOR CERTIFICATION Qualified Local Vendors desiring consideration under the City of Temecula Local Vendor Preference Program must complete the following and submit with their Proposal (print or type): (Individual Submitting Bid) of/for certify that (Title) (Company Name) (Company Name) is a City of Temecula Local Vendor as defined under the Local Vednor Preference Program - Services section of this solicitation (titled ) and therefore qualifies for the Local Vendor Preference. Signature Title NOTIFICATION OF OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE BID Date The Local Vendor will be notified of his/her opportunity, to reduce its bid under=City of Temecula Local Vendor Preference. Local Vendor must elect to reduce its bid or quote to match the bid or quote of the lowest bidder, in writing, within one (1) business day (excluding weekends and holidays) of being notified of their status by the City. Notification to Vendor shall be considered complete upon City's transmission of e-mail (potentially through City's online bid management system) or Fax. The Local Vendor shall state his/her preferred method of notification below along with the appropriate e-mail address and Fax number. Notification by City will be limited to one of those two (2) methods. It will be the Local Vendor's responsibility to check his/her e-mail or Fax messages for notification. The Vendor's delay in receiving his/her notification will not alter the one (1) business day period allowed for re -bid submission. Local Vendor to Complete: Indicate ONE method for notification of Local Vendor re -bid by providing the appropriate e-mail address or Fax number: Submit this document as a part of your quotation. E-Mail: Fax Number (Identify Contact Person if Usinq a Fax Nu Attachment D Sample Corporate Sponsorship Agreement Terms and conditions: THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of , between the CHOOSE AN ITEM, a CHOOSE AN ITEM (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and , a (hereinafter referred to as "Sponsor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: The City grants to the Sponsor the non-exclusive sponsorship rights set out in this agreement. 1. Payment: I, as the representative of the Sponsor, understand full payment must be received at the following address, as indicated in the brochure, in order to receive recognition: City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590. 2. Term: This Agreement shall be effective from the date first set forth at signature of agreement, through the event at the end of the day, [Insert Date]. 3. Event Date: The event will be held rain or shine on pnsert Date]. 4. Sponsor Licensed Marks: Sponsor grants, a limited, non-exclusive license to the City to use Sponsor's name, logo, service marks and trademarks solely for the purpose of including Sponsor in listings and descriptions of the City event Sponsors during the term of this Agreement. The City shall not sub -license, transfer or assign the use of the Sponsor Licensed Marks to any person or entity without the prior consent of Sponsor. 5. Sponsor/Benefits Payment: Sponsor shall receive the [insert Sponsorship Level, e.g. Gold Level status] set forth in [Insert Name of Program, e.g. Winterfest] Sponsorship Application Packet, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Sponsor shall pay its sponsorship donation on or before [Insert Date]. Failure to pay any portion of the sponsorship donation by the above due date may result in the forfeiture of Sponsor's sponsorship benefits. The City requires Sponsor to provide written documentation to support the value of any in -kind donation prior to accepting such donations as credit towards Sponsor's sponsorship donation. 6. Sponsorship Cancellation: Neither Sponsor nor the City shall be responsible for damages that result in delays or postponements of the City event due to circumstances beyond their reasonable control. In the event that the City event does not take place, Sponsor's sponsorship fee as set forth above shall be treated as a donation to the City and shall not be refunded. 7. Relationship of Entire Agreement: The parties in this Agreement have no legal relationship other than as contracting parties to this Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between parties and supersedes any prior understandings or agreements. 8. Notices: Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: CHOOSE AN ITEM P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Use this Address for a Delivery Service or Hand -Deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: CHOOSE AN ITEM 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Sponsor: Company Name Attn: Address: 9. Assignment: The Sponsor shall not assign the rights on the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Sponsor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Sponsor. 10. Termination: The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Sponsor at least twenty four (24) hours prior written notice. If this Agreement is terminated, the City shall refund any donation made by Sponsor within ten (10) days of termination date. 11. Amendments to the Agreement: Any amendment to this Agreement shall only be valid if the amendment is in writing and signed by both parties. 12. Prohibited Interests: No officer, or employee of the City that has participated in the development of this Agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Sponsor, or Sponsor's sub -Sponsor for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Sponsor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City that has participated in the development of this Agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Sponsor or Sponsor's sub -Sponsor on this project. Sponsor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 13. Governing Law: The City and Sponsor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govem the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 14. Authority to Execute This Agreement: The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Sponsor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Sponsor and has the authority to bind Sponsor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) agreement termination. I have read, understand and agree to the Corporate Sponsorship Program terms and conditions (above). Sponsor Representative Signature City of Temecula Signature Date Date DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS Item No. 9 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director :A�__ City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Community Development DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following are the recent highlights for the Community Development Department in October. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases: Planning received 51 new applications for administrative review, minor cases, and home occupations, including 6 applications for public hearings, during the month of October. A detailed account of current planning activities is attached to this report. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: KB Home plans to construct 98 single-family homes within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Area. On May 15, 2013, the Planning Commission approved KB Home's application for Pinnacle. The model home complex is under construction and 21 building permits have been pulled. On June 19, 2013, the Planning Commission approved Home Product Review Applications for Standard Pacific and Van Daele Development. Standard Pacific will build 200 single-family homes under the marketing names Montego and Cambridge. Van Daele Development will construct 113 single-family homes, 56 marketed as Verona and 57 as Sorrento. The three builders will construct 411 homes in four of five available planning areas in the panhandle. An application has not been filed forthe remaining planning area, Planning Area 2. The models for each builder's product are complete, and multiple phases are under construction. (PETERS) Mercedes-Benz of Temecula: Mercedes-Benz of Temecula, located at Temecula Center Drive (northwest corner of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane), was approved at the July 9, 2008 Planning Commission hearing. A Supplemental EIR was also adopted at that hearing. The Planning Commission approved a Major Modification on February 20, 2013 to reduce the size of the dealership building from approximately 80,000 square feet to 50,258 square feet, and revise the architecture of the building. The grading permit was issued to the applicant on April 1, 2013, and the building permit was issued on April 23, 2013. Construction of the project is ongoing and opening of the dealership is anticipated in spring 2014. (RICHARDSON, FISK) Temecula Valley Hospital: City Council approved the Temecula Valley Hospital project on January 22, 2008. Vertical construction for the first hospital bed tower began on February 13, 2012 and was substantially complete on May 16, 2013. A Certificate of Occupancy for the Phase I hospital bed tower was received from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) on July 19, 2013. United Health Services, who owns and operates the hospital, obtained State licensing to open the hospital for patients on October 14, 2013. On May 31, 2013, staff received a Major Modification application to modify the site plan and heliport Conditional Use Permit to relocate the heliport from an area near the northeast corner of the hospital building. UHS has indicated that the heliport needs to be relocated based on concerns from the FAA and the aeronautical division of Caltrans. UHS is proposing two phases of movement for the heliport: Phase I would place the heliport to the west of the hospital building, in one of the parking lot areas. Phase 11 would place the heliport on the roof of the second hospital tower. In both cases the proposed locations result in a change to the flight path that move it away from the Summerhouse residential project and changes the path to either head directly into or away from the prevailing wind direction (rather that perpendicular to the prevailing winds), as directed by the FAA and Caltrans. This application is under review, and will require the preparation of a Supplemental EIR before the project is scheduled for a public hearing. (FISK) LONG RANGE PLANNING The Long Range Planning Division works toward larger scale and longer time -frame projects. These activities can range from an environmental review to a new specific plan or a General Plan amendment. Some of the major projects and long-range planning activities currently in progress are described below. Hike Bike Temecula (Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update): On October 9, 2012, City Council adopted a resolution to reaffirm and clarify the Bike Lane and Trail Program Map. The map identifies existing bike lanes and trails, but also identifies missing gaps needed to complete a citywide network. The map classifies future bike lanes and trail routes to develop an Old Town to Wine Country Trail, a Lake Skinner Trail, and a Temecula Loop around the entire City. In February 2013, the Trails Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Naggar and Council Member Washington, directed staff to solicit proposals for an update to the Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. City Council awarded the contract to KTU+A on May 14. Phase I will focus on public outreach and workshops and Phase II will update the new Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. On August 27, 2013, City Council approved an amendment to the contract to include a sidewalk gap analysis within the Master Plan Update. A community workshop was held on Saturday, October 26, 2013. Approximately 45 people attended to provide their input on bike lanes, sidewalks, trails, hiking paths, and equestrian connections. Community input is also being collected through a survey, which can be found on the project website www.hikebiketemecula.org until November 15, 2013. The workshop and survey results will be summarized in a report to be completed before the end of the year. (PETERS, LEHNER) Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan: The Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Area encompasses approximately 560 acres and is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, south of Cherry Street, and east of Diaz Road. In January 2011, City Council established the Jefferson Avenue Ad Hoc Subcommittee, comprised of Council Members Roberts and Comerchero. The Specific Plan is intended to guide the revitalization of this area over the next 30 years. A project website, www.envisionmefferson.org, tracks the visioning process, Steering Committee meetings, and provides updates to the public. Staff is developing the Specific Plan based on the eight recommendations that emerged from the public visioning process. The Environmental Impact Report will be prepared simultaneously. Plan completion is anticipated in early 2014. On June 13, 2013, staff held a Developer Focus Group to determine the feasibility of the Specific Plan based upon anticipated market conditions, economic demands, demographic trends, and available financing mechanisms. On July 16, 2013, staff held the first of six public Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Steering Committee Meetings. Two commissioners from the Planning Commission, Community Services Commission, Public/Traffic Safety Commission sit on the Steering Committee. Staff presented a recap of the visioning process, the eight visioning recommendations, overview of form -based code principles, draft districts map, building heights, residential density, and the anticipated 30-year build out scenario. On August 28, 2013, staff held the second Steering Committee meeting and gave a presentation on the draft districts, anticipated land use mix, draft land use matrix, administration of legal non -conforming land uses, building types, frontage types, and build -to line requirements. On September 19, 2013, staff held the third Steering Committee meeting. There were approximately 30 attendees. Staff presented a discussion of the future hypothetical street -grid concept, block size standards, future street cross sections, and public realm. On October 29, 2013, staff held the fourth Steering Committee meeting. Approximately 25 attendees were at this meeting. The topics discussed included multi -modal mobility, circulation, congestion management, and draft parking standards. The next Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Steering Committee meeting will be held on November 19, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. in the Conference Center. Meeting topics will include a discussion of the draft plan administration, draft permit processing procedures, draft sign standards, and draft public signage concept. (RICHARDSON, WATSON, INNES, WEST) Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report: The preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is underway for the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan. Environmental Science Associates is preparing the EIR document. The Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP) were routed for circulation to responsible, trustee agencies and the Office of Planning and Research on June 10, 2013. The NOP comment period ended July 12, 2013. An EIR Scoping meeting was held on June 27, 2013, providing interested parties the opportunity to submit their comments related to EIR. All property owners within the Specific Plan area were noticed forthis meeting. The Administrative Draft EIR was submitted on August 28, 2013 and staff is reviewing the draft document. (RICHARDSON, WATSON, INNES, WEST) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) & HOUSING Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): The City of Temecula was awarded $517,195 in CDBG grant funding for Fiscal Year 2013-14. On August 27, 2013, City Council approved allocating 20 percent for program administration and fair housing services ($103,439), 15 percent for public services ($77,333) to be divided evenly between seven non-profit service providers, and the remaining 65 percent for infrastructure improvements ($342,423). The City's first Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) was adopted by City Council on September 24, 2013, and submitted to HUD on September 30th. Currently, staff is accepting public service applications for 2014-15 CDBG program year funding; applications are due on December 13, 2013. The City's annual CDBG workshops at the have been scheduled at the Conference Center on November 25th. The City holds two outreach meetings each year to allow for community participation and citizen feedback regarding CDBG funding, and to provide technical assistance for those seeking to apply for a portion of the 15 percent service funding allocation. Staff will begin drafting the 2014-15 Annual Action Plan (AAP) and funding priorities in early January 2014. (WEAVER) 2014-2021 Housing Element Update: State law requires the City to adopt an updated Housing Element and have it certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). City staff is collaborating with Pacific Municipal Consultants to assist with the update of the Housing Element. Public outreach efforts include one workshop, a public review period, and two public hearings. In December 2012, the City held a community workshop to discuss the Housing Element update, and receive input from residents regarding housing needs. The preliminary administrative draft was submitted to HCD in late March. The City formally rescinded their initial submittal on May 20, 2013, and requested informal review to address HCD's comments. The administrative draft was resubmitted on September 27, 2013. The City plans to notice the document for public review in December and schedule the project for adoption by the City Council in January 2014. (WEAVER) ENERGY & CONSERVATION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES Western Riverside Energy Leadership Partnership: This Partnership consists of 11 WRCOG member cities, Southern California Edison (SCE), and Southern California Gas (SCG). The Partnership provides incentives for participating cities, businesses, and residents to develop energy efficiency programs. In March, Temecula was the first city to achieve a Gold Level status by completing 13 energy efficiency projects in FY 2012-13, while increasing total kWh savings to 813,037, and resulted in nearly $100,000 of annual utility cost savings. In August, SCE approved a rebate incentive of $1,983 to replace 29 parking lot fixtures at the Community Recreation Center (CRC) with energy efficient induction lighting technology. The CRC lighting retrofit project will reduce the annual energy consumption by 15,000 kWh. The SCE rebate and estimated annual utility savings will be deposited into the Temecula Energy and Asset Management Fund for future energy efficiency projects. Staff intends to leverage technical assistance from Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas provided through the Western Riverside Energy Leadership Partnership with the California Energy commission (CEC) Technical Assistance Program to perform a comprehensive energy audit or retro commissioning audit of the City's library. A staff report and resolution requesting the City Council to authorize the City Manager to prepare a CEC Technical Assistance application will be considered by the City Council on November 12, 2013. (WEST) Energy Action Plans (EAP): Draft Municipal and Community Energy Action Plans have been prepared for the City of Temecula. The preparation of these plans was funded through the Energy Partnership as part of the first year program development. The Municipal EAP establishes the baseline energy use and forecast energy demand of City owned and operated facilities, while the Community EAP establishes the baseline energy use and demand within the community. Both EAPs establish energy reduction goals, policies, and implementation actions to achieve the goals of the EAP. Staff has identified potential energy reduction measures to achieve the proposed goals within each EAP. The draft EAP is ready for consideration by the City Council. (WEST) Green House Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory/Climate Action Plan: A draft Municipal GHG inventory and Community GHG inventory has been prepared for the City of Temecula. The preparation of the inventories was funded through the Energy Partnership and grant funds received by Western Riverside Council of Governments. Baseline energy and forecast energy data from the Energy Action Plans were used to establish a baseline for the emission inventories. The inventories will be incorporated into the Western Riverside County Climate Action Plan for implementation of strategies that address state legislation AB 32 and SB 375. The Climate Action Plan proposes to address overall greenhouse gas emissions by identifying emission reduction targets, and by developing GHG emissions reduction measures. Staff has provided comments to the Municipal and Community GHG inventories and to the Climate Action Plan. (WEST) Temecula Energy Asset Management (TEAM) Fund: Staff is working with Public Financial Management Inc., a consultant funded through the Energy Partnership, to develop an administrative policy and procedure manual for the TEAM Fund. The TEAM Fund is designed to be self-sustaining by depositing utility rebate incentives directly into the Fund and by re -directing annual utility costs savings from energy efficiency projects into the Fund. The TEAM brings together the efforts of the Municipal Facility Energy Benchmarking and the Energy Action Plan to identify the most appropriate energy efficiency projects for programming with TEAM funds. At the June 25, 2013 City Council Meeting, City Council established the TEAM Fund, and redirected $119,728.90 in SCE and SCG rebates received in Fiscal Year 2012-13 into the Fund. A final report will be brought forward to City Council for approval. (WEST) Solid Waste and Recycling: Staff manages the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Franchise Agreement with CR&R and acts as a liaison between the City and CR&R and their customers. Staff is currently working with CR&R to establish a special disposal rate for the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. The new rate will reduce the City's overall cost of CIP projects. City staff and CR&R coordinate two Citywide Clean-up events each year. The Citywide Clean-up was on scheduled for October 5, 2013 at Chaparral High School. The Citywide Clean-up collected 70 tons of miscellaneous debris, 3.4 tons of electronic waste, 20 auto batteries, 55 gallons of antifreeze, 450 gallons of motor oil, and 8.2 tons of scrap metal. City staff also assists with outreach for the Riverside County Mobile Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events (HHWE) and the Backyard Composting Workshops. The next Backyard Composting Workshop will be held on November 16, 2013 at the Mary Phillips Senior Center. These programs are open to all Riverside County residents. (WEST) SPECIAL PROJECTS Old Town Trolley: On April 9, 2013, the Old Town Steering Committee Meeting, consisting of Mayor Naggar and Council Member Roberts, approved a pilot program forthe Old Town Trolleywith Brewen's Empire Trolley. The pilot program, which ran from May 4 through August 3, provided free, public transportation throughout Old Town that is convenient to restaurants, shops, and the Civic Center. The trolley encourages visitors to park in the public Civic Center parking garage. The Old Town Steering Committee met for pilot program updates on June 171" and July 24t". On August 1, 2013, the Steering Committee proposed to extend the Old Town Trolley Program to cover five Hot Summer Nights in August and Saturday service until January 2014. (RICHARDSON, LEHNER) BUILDING & SAFETY Inspections: During the month of October, Building and Safety conducted 2,384 inspections. On average, there were 103.65 inspections per day, or 25.91 inspections per inspector per day. Permits: During the month of October, Building and Safety issued 348 construction permits. Of these permits, 16 were dwelling units. Some of these permits included: Tenant Improvements Jersey Mike's — 32068 Temecula Parkway Suite 300 Carter's Babies and Kids — 26431 Ynez Road Suite A Hot Yoga Healthy You — 44054 Margarita Road Suite 5 The Habit Burger Grill — 32068 Temecula Parkway Suite 500 China One Restaurant — 32067 Temecula Parkway Suite 200 Harmony within Wellness Center — 26489 Ynez Road Suite C Non -Construction Certificate of OCCUDanc BJ Global Direct — 43089 Business Park Drive Phonomenon Restaurant — 41797 Nicole Lane Abromovich Motors — 27941 Jefferson Avenue Smart Marketing Division — 43178 Business Park Drive Suite 100 M Noodle and Sushi Shop — 43053 Margarita Road Suite 105 California Dog University — 28822 Old Town Front Street Suite 202 Dream Dinner Temecula — 31757 Temecula Parkway Suite E Simply Healthy — 40573 Margarita Rd Suite I CODE ENFORCEMENT In the month of October, Code Enforcement responded to 47 web complaints from constituents. In addition, they opened 82 cases, 49 of which were residential and 33 were commercial. Code Enforcement also pulled 800 non -conforming signs in the community. The breakdown of Code Enforcement responses can be found in the chart below. Code Enforcement worked with Temecula Police Department regarding 19 vehicles (cars, boats, trailers, and RVs). These vehicles were illegally parked, abandoned, or blocking the public right of way. Seventeen people were assisted at the Community Development counter. October 2013 - Code Enforcement Cases TYPE OF CODE CASE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TYPE TOTAL Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 6 0 6 Vacant Home / Property Maintenance / Rodent infested 5 4 9 Business or Home Occupation w/o license 1 4 5 Abandoned Home / Vandalism 1 0 1 Trash and Debris / Parking lot maintenance 4 0 4 Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 9 0 9 Green Pool / Vector Control 5 0 5 Graffiti 0 4 4 Noise 0 2 2 Trailer / RV Stored 5 0 5 Construction w/o Permit 3 4 7 Encroach Public ROW / Trash Cans 8 0 8 Other / Homeless Encampment 0 0 0 Other / Smoking Ordinance / Safety Issue 0 0 0 Other / Safety Issue - Pool no fence/gate 0 1 1 Other/Parking 1 0 1 Signs Pulled - Violations 1 14 15 49 33 82 Web Complaints 47 TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES 129 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, real estate owned properties, and properties in default in both commercial and residential development. The following charts demonstrate the past six months of foreclosure tracking activities in Temecula. Both residential and commercial foreclosures continue to decline in Temecula as the economy improves. Residential Foreclosure Tracking AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER MAY 2013 JUNE 2013 JULY 2013 2013 2013 2013 DEFAULT 137 140 136 110 100 104 FORECLOSED 156 154 137 120 116 118 REO 83 76 79 71 60 67 TOTALS 376 370 352 301 276 289 Commercial Foreclosure Tracking AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER MAY 2013 JUNE 2013 JULY 2013 2013 2013 2013 DEFAULT 8 7 7 7 7 6 FORECLOSED 3 6 3 3 3 4 REO 41 58 59 40 34 33 TOTALS 52 71 69 50 44 43 1. Planning Agenda Report 10/1/2013 through 10/31/2013 Recently Approved APN # • PA13-0086 IGLESIA NI CRISTO MOD 944290006 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Modification for Iglesia Ni Cristo to make architectural/building facade changes to their existing sanctuary building located at 29385 Rancho California Road. Submitted Date Approved Date Apr 11 2013 Oct 2 2013 At,N if • PA13-0187 Belle Maison Home Product 953390007 ERIC JONES A Home Product Review application for Bella Maison by Lennar Homes. The tract features one and two story homes on 37 lots generally located on the northwest corner of Butterfield Stage Road and Chemin Clinet. Submitted Date Approved Date Aug 1 2013 Oct 16 2013 AVN IT • PA13-0221 Walmart Storage TUP 960010047 FAHMIDA RASHID A Major Temporary Use Permit for Walmart to allow temporary seasonal holiday storage containers at the rear of the building from October 1, 2013, through January 10, 2014, at 32225 Temecula Parkway. Submitted Date Approved Date Sep 19 2013 Oct 8 2013 Arry ff • PA13-0224 EJ Dental and Ortho TUP 961080021 MATTHEW PETERS A Major Temporary Use Permit for EJ Dental and Orthodontic to hold a grand opening event on October 26, 2013 from 10:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at 31773 Temecula Parkway, Suite A. Food and non-alcoholic beverages will be Drovided. There will be music provided by KFROG radio station. Submitted Date Approved Date Sep 23 2013 1 1 Oct 15 2013 Arry ff • PA13-0235 Crossroads Fall Family Festiva 910110042 FAHMIDA RASHID Planning Application No. PA13-0235, a Major Temporary Use Permit to allow an outdoor fall family festival providing food, drinks, and gaming activities on October 31, 2013 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the Crossroad Church front parking lot located at 26090 Ynez Road. Alcohol will not be provided at this event. Submitted Date Approved Date Sep 30 2013 Oct 23 2013 mrN x • PA12-0197 Iglesia Ni Cristo Office MOD 944290006 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Modification to allow a new 3,500 square foot church office building to replace an existing modular office buildina in the same location at 29385 Rancho California Road. Submitted Date Approved Date Oct 9 2012 Oct 2 2013 1 of 7 Planning Agenda Report 10/1/2013 through 10/31/2013 2, Scheduled for Hearing APN # • PA11-0275 Bella Linda DP 961450012 ERIC JONES A Development Plan Application for a residential project. Consisting of 325 multi -family apartment units. The project will also feature 49 single-family cluster units (senior units). The project totals 25.56 acres and is located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road (APNs 961-450-012, 013, 003) (Related Applications: PA11-0276, 0277). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date City Council Oct 27 2011 Nov 26 2013 APN # • PA11-0276 Bella Linda Zone Change, PDO 961450012 ERIC JONES A Zone Change and Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Application for a two phased residential project. Both the General Plan and Zoning designations are currently Professional Office (PO). The application proposes to create a Medium Density Residential section (Courtyard Housing) and a High Density Residential Section (Apartments). The PDO will provide architectural and landscape design guidelines. The project is located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road and totals 25.56 acres (APNs: 961-450-012, 013, 003) (Related Applications: PA11-0275 and PA11-0277). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date City Council Oct 27 2011 Nov 26 2013 APN # • PA11-0277 Bella Linda TTM 961450012 ERIC JONES A Tentative Tract Map application to create 54 separate residential lots from three existing lots. Four additional lots will also be created: Lots A - C will contain the public right-of-way through the center lines of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road, and Lot D will consist of a private road. The project totals 22.73 acres and is located on the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road (APNs 961-450-012, 013, 003) (Related Applications: PA11-0276 & PA11-0275). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date City Council Oct 27 2011 Nov 26 2013 APN # • PA13-0166 United Surgery Major Mod 959070031 ERIC JONES A Major Modification application to revise a previously approved 6,000 square foot restaurant (that has not been constructed) to a 12,545 square foot surgery center. The project site is generally located on the northeast corner of Temecula Parkway and Rancho Pueblo Road at 31469 Rancho Pueblo Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Jul 9 2013 Nov 6 2013 APN # • PA13-0203 Relentless Brewing CUP 909252011 KENNY TAYLOR A Minor Conditional Use Permit for Relentless Brewing to operate a beer manufacturing facility with a 495 square foot retail sales and tasting area located at 42030 Avenida Alvarado, Suites E & F. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Aug 29 2013 9/19/2013 TBD AFN # • PA11-0157 Arco Major Modification 959080017 ERIC JONES 2of7 Planning Agenda Report 10/1/2013 through 10/31/2013 A Major Modification application to allow an existing gas station/convenience store to add 1,000 square feet to the existing store for a deli and outdoor seating at 44239 Margarita Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Directors Hearing Jun 6 2011 Nov 7 2013 3of7 3. Planning Agenda Report 10/1/2013 through 10/31/2013 New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting APN # • PA12-0131 Arbor Vista GPA 919350017 ERIC JONES A General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density residential. The project site is located on 73 acres at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. (APN 919-350-0117, - 0118, -0119, -120) (Associated applications: PA12-0132, Zone Change to PDO; PA12-0133, TTM 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 TBD APN # • PA12-0132 Arbor Vista ZC to PDO 919350017 ERIC JONES A Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Low (L) density residential designation with provisions for a cluster development. The project site is located on 73 acres at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APN 919-350-017, -018, - 019, -120) (Associated applications: PA12-0131, GPA; PA12-0133, TTM 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 TBD APN # • PA12-0133 Arbor Vista TTM 36479 919350017 ERIC JONES A Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 5,500 square feet. Approximately 59% of the site will be preserved as permanent open space to preserve the existing drainage on -site. Access to the site will be provided from Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APN 919-350-017, -018, -019, -120) (Associated applications: PA12-0131, GPA; PA12-0132, Zone Change to PDO; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 TBD APN # • PA12-0134 Arbor Vista HPR 919350017 ERIC JONES A Residential Home Product review for 83 lots to be created with TTM 36479 (PA10-0133) for 4 floor plans ranging in size from approximately 2,700 to 3,500 square feet with three elevation types each including Craftsman, Spanish and Traditional. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APN 919-350- 017, -018, -019, -120) (Associated applications: PA12-0131, GPA; PA12-0132, Zone Change to PDO; and PA12- 0133, TTM 36479). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 TBD APN # • PA13-0068 Tower Plaza Addition and Mod 921260022 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Modification to add 1,564 square feet of new restaurant and professional office space at 27423 Ynez Road (Tower Plaza Center). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Mar 26 2013 TBD APN # 4of7 Planning Agenda Report 10/1/2013 through 10/31/2013 • PA13-0141 UHS Heliport Major Mod 959080001 STUART FISK Major Modification and Supplemental EIR for the Temecula Valley Hospital Development Plan and Heliport Conditional Use Permit to relocate the heliport from the east side of the project site to the west side of the site at 31700 Temecula Parkway. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned May 31 2013 6/27/2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0155 Shearwater Creek DP 922110013 ERIC JONES A Development Plan to construct a 141 unit attached residential project with a pool and clubhouse for project residents, located on the west side of Pujol Street at the southern end of Pujol Street (APNs: 922-110-013, 922-110- 014) (Related Application: PA13-0156 - Condo Map) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jun 18 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0167 River Springs CUP 921750014 KENNY TAYLOR A Minor Conditional Use Permit allowing River Springs Charter School to occupy an existing 16,978 square foot building for charter school educational services to adolescent students Kindergarten thru 8th grade located at the southeast corner of Ynez Road and Ynez Court at 26770 Ynez Court Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 10 2013 TBD W_1:1►iiM • PA13-0216 T-Mobile TUP 961080007 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow T-Mobile to install a temporary wireless telecommunication facility within the McDonald's Restaurant parking lot at 31853 Temecula Parkway during remodeling of the building. (Vail Ranch Shopping Center) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Sep 12 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0217 Rancho Vista Vlg TTM Revision 944060006 STUART FISK A Tentative Tract Map revision application for condominium purposes to change the number of lots from 4 lots (one condominium lot, one recreation building lot, and two open space lots) to 3 lots (one condominium lot, one recreation building lot, and one open space lot) for 59 detached condominium units located at the northeast corner of Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Sep 12 2013 10/10/2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0240 Wolf Creek Development Plan 962010007 ERIC JONES A Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 174 unit condo complex with associated amenities generally located at the southeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Wolf Valley Road (APN: 962-010-007) (Related AoDlication: PA13-0241) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 7 2013 TBD 5 of 7 Planning Agenda Report 10/1/2013 through 10/31/2013 APN # • PA13-0241 Wolf Creek CUP 962010007 ERIC JONES A Conditional Use Permit to allow a 174 unit condo complex to be constructed within the Wolf Creek Specific Plan, generally located at the southeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Wolf Valley Road (APN: 962-010-007) (Related Application PA13-0240) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 7 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0243 Quaid Harley Davidson TUP 922110026 FAHMIDA RASHID A Major Temporary Use Permit for Quaid Harley Davidson's Support of Troops X event to take place on December 7, 2013, from 11 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at 28897 Old Town Front Street. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 8 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0244 Belle Maison Model Home App 953390007 ERIC JONES A Model Home Complex application to allow Lennar Homes to have two models for Belle Maison generally located at the northwest corner of Butterfield Stage Road and Chemin Clinet. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 14 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0249 TC/ Development Agreement 922220002 MATTHEW PETERS A Development Agreement application for the Temecula Creek Inn project, which includes a Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan to expand Temecula Creek Inn into a master -planned 18-hole golf course resort and community on 305 acres located 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road. The Specific Plan proposes four Planning Areas: Planning Area 1 includes an expansion of the existing hotel by 99 rooms from 128 to 227 guest rooms (active adult option on 126 units) and the addition of a spa and banquet facilities totaling 153,837 square feet. Planning Areas 2-4 include a maximum 409 single family and multi -family residential units ranging in size from 1,600 to 4,300 square feet. Related Cases PA08-0118, PA08-0119, PA08-0120, PA08-0121 (APNs 922- 220-002; 003; 008; 031; and 922-230-002; 003; 004; 007; 008) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 22 2013 11/14/2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0250 Great West Major TUP 966010012 VICTORIA HERNANDEZ A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow Great West Christmas Trees LLC to operate Christmas tree sales located on a vacant lot within the Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center from November 15, 2013 thru December 24, 2013, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday thru Friday, 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturdays, and 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. Sundays at 43810 Butterfield Stage Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 22 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0250 Great West Major TUP 966010012 KENNY TAYLOR 6of7 Planning Agenda Report 10/1/2013 through 10/31/2013 A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow Great West Christmas Trees LLC to operate Christmas tree sales located on a vacant lot within the Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center from November 15, 2013 thru December 24, 2013, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday thru Friday, 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturdays, and 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. Sundays at 43810 Butterfield Stage Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 22 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0256 Harley-Davidson TUP 922110026 VICTORIA HERNANDEZ A Major Temporary Use Permit (TUP) to allow Quaid Temecula Harley-Davidson to conduct a celebrity of life fundraiser event at 28964 Old Town Front Street on November 24, 2013 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 25 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0261 1909 922044025 KENNY TAYLOR A Minor Conditional Use Permit for 1909 restaurant, a bona fide eating establishment, to allow for a Type 47 ABC license (on -sale general beer/wine/distilled spirits) at 28656 Old Town Front Street. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 30 2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0207 Redhawk Residential Condo Map 962020012 KENNY TAYLOR A Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes for 77 detached residential units on 7.72 acres generally located at the southeast corner of Peach Tree Street and Deer Hollow Way. (Related Application: PA13-0206 - Development Plan) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Sep 3 2013 10/3/2013 TBD APN # • PA13-0175 Happy Days Hookah 920100030 KENNY TAYLOR A Minor Conditional Use Permit for Happy Days Hookah and Vapor Lounge to allow indoor smoking of hookah and tobacco products for members age 18 and over within an existing building. Proposed hours of operations are from 1 p.m. to 12 a.m. seven days per week at 27287 Nicolas Road (Chaparral Village). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Directors Hearing Jul 18 2013 Oct 24 2013 APN # • PA10-0213 Simms TTM 945120001 ERIC JONES A Tentative Tract Map application to create 5 residential lots from 4 lots with lot size ranging from 1.31 acres to 2.80 acres on vacant property generally located on the south side of Santiago Road, approximately 1,500 feet east of Ynez Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 14 2010 8/12/2010 TBD 7of7 N Item No. 10 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director :A�_ City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jeffrey Kubel, Chief of Police DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Will Edwards, Sergeant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of October 2013. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service..............................................................................................2,711 "Priority One" calls for service...................................................................................................62 Average response time for "Priority One" calls......................................................... 5.81 Minutes VOLUNTEERS Volunteeradministration hours................................................................................................202 SpecialEvents hours..............................................................................................................223 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours..................................................................................1011 Reserve officer hours (patrol)....................................................................................................56 Traininghours.........................................................................................................................120 TotalVolunteer hours............................................................................................................1403 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention workshops /Neighborhood watch meetings conducted...............................19/5 Residential/Business security surveys conducted....................................................................2/8 Businessesvisited......................................................................................................................6 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up...........................................................0/6 StationTour................................................................................................................................4 Planning Review Projects/Temp Outdoor Use Permits...........................................................3/11 Square Footage of Graffiti Removed..............................................................................1,360 Total customers served...........................................................................................................289 Sets of fingerprints taken..........................................................................................................44 Policereports filed....................................................................................................................12 Citationssigned off...................................................................................................................13 CarSeat Inspections...................................................................................................................0 Totalreceipts................................................................................................................ $4,014.00 SPECIAL TEAMS (POP / SET) Onsight felony arrests................................................................................................................4 On sight misdemeanor arrests..................................................................................................15 Felony arrest warrants served.....................................................................................................4 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served..........................................................................................3 Follow-up investigations............................................................................................................. 4 Parole/Probation Searches.....................................................................................................2/1 PedestrianChecks................................................................................................................... 29 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks.....................................................................................................8 CrimeFree Housing Checks......................................................................................................2 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations..............................................................................1110 Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints..........................................................................0 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket.............................................................................................0 D.U.I. Arrests............................................................................................................................28 Non -hazardous citations.........................................................................................................727 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations.......................................................73 Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations.................................................................87 Parkingcitations......................................................................................................................121 SchoolZone............................................................................................................................137 Seatbelts................................................................................................................................... 83 CellPhone Cites.....................................................................................................................292 Injurycollisions..........................................................................................................................35 INVESTIGATIONS BeginningCaseload................................................................................................................165 TotalCases Assigned..............................................................................................................75 TotalCases Closed..................................................................................................................70 SearchWarrants Served............................................................................................................7 Arrests........................................................................................................................................7 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Callsfor service......................................................................................................................914 Felonyarrest/filings.....................................................................................................................3 Misdemeanor arrest/filings........................................................................................................25 TrafficCitations.........................................................................................................................47 Fingerprints/Livescans............................................................................................................164 Totalreceipts................................................................................................................ $9,754.00 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felonyarrests.............................................................................................................................3 Misdemeanorarrests..................................................................................................................9 Reports.....................................................................................................................................21 Youthcounseled.....................................................................................................................211 Meetings...................................................................................................................................63 Item No. 11 Approvals City Attorney A Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Amer Attar, Acting City Engineer DATE: November 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Reports RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file Public Works Department Activity Reports for Capital Improvement Projects for the second half of October 2013, and the first half of November 2013, and the Street Maintenance report for the month of October 2013. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report October / November 2013 Prepared by: Amer Attar Submitted by: Amer Attar Date: 11 /26/2013 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Old Town Civic Center This project constructed the Old Town Civic Center. Dedication ceremony was held on December 9, 2010, and the City started operations from the new structure on December 20, 2010. Resolution of punchlist and added work items are complete. Closure of the project is being delayed by business concerns of the general contractor. Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements - Environmental Mitigation This project includes construction of a mitigation site for the Wolf Valley Creek Channel Improvements - Stage I. At the February 12, 2013 meeting, the City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to advertise for construction bids for the 3.4 acres of riparian habitat. Bids were opened on June 13, 2013, and the construction contract was awarded by City Council to Nature's Image on July 24, 2013. Work started after the nesting season ended on September 15, 2013. Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek (Replacement) This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. Construction is in progress. Assembling of bridge structure in place began October 14, 2013, estimated duration four weeks. Bridge falsework removed from creek as of October 26, 2013, and structure is now a self-supporting clear span. Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Over Santa Gertrudis Creek This project includes the construction of an approximately 150 foot long pedestrian/bike bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek near Chaparral High School. This portion of the project is complete. The mitigation/monitoring portion of the project, which involves removal of invasive plant species from the creek channel and a subsequent two-year monitoring period, began on September 17, 2012. Maintenance and monitoring is ongoing. French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Over -Crossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase I This Project includes widening of southbound Interstate 15 from Warm Springs Creek to the Winchester Road off -ramp, widening of the Winchester Road off -ramp, construction of the new southbound off -ramp at French Valley Parkway, and construction of the westbound portion of French Valley Parkway from the off -ramp to Jefferson Avenue. This Project is under construction from June 2012 through February 2014. See project web page for construction updates: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/FrenchValley.htm. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Desilting Basin Environmental Mitigation This project installed landscape and irrigation improvements on a 0.26 acre Habitat Creation Area and maintaining it for five years in accordance with a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Program. The work was completed on January 20, 2011. The project is now in the five-year maintenance/monitoring program. Great Oak High School Tennis Court Lighting This project will install lights around the tennis courts at Great Oaks High School. Bids were opened on May 23, 2013. At the June 11, 2013 meeting, the City Council awarded the contract to MDE Group, Inc. This project started construction on July 31, 2013, and is expected to be completed the first week of December 2013. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Ynez Road This project will rehabilitate Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Solana Way. Project was awarded to All American Asphalt at the June 26, 2012 City Council Meeting. Contractor is addressing final punch list items. Temecula Community Center Renovation City Council awarded the contract to LDCO, Inc. on June 11, 2013. First day of work was July 15, 2013. Structural upgrades continue as well as Plumbing, Electrical and HVAC rough in. French Valley Parkway Environmental Mitigation This project implemented the riparian mitigation requirement of the HMMP that was developed for the French Valley Parkway Interchange project. Work involved creation of a 2.73 acre riparian site through planting native plant species and removing non-native and invasive plant species. Construction started on October 2, 2012 and was completed November 5, 2012. This site will be monitored and maintained for five years. Roripaugh Ranch Street Improvements Phase II Contract was awarded on December 11, 2012. First day of work was January 14, 2013. Mass grading, retaining walls and underground utility work is ongoing. Theater Energy Efficient Lighting Including Technology and Equipment Upgrade The Notice to Proceed was issued for the procurement of the equipment on January 2, 2013. The vendor has provided all purchased equipment. Theater staff has installed all the lights and equipment and the new system is up and running as of August 12, 2013. Project accepted at the City Council meeting on October 22, 2013, and the project is complete. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Rancho Vista Road This project rehabilitated Rancho Vista Road from Margarita Road to Paseo Goleta. This Project was awarded at the April 9, 2013 City Council Meeting to R.J. Noble Company. Construction was substantially complete on August 13, 2013, just prior to the start of the school year at the nearby Temecula Valley High. Fire Station 84 Roof Replacement This project will replace the roof at Fire Station 84. Bids were opened on July 25, 2013. The contract was awarded to All Weather Roofing on August 13, 2013. Construction started on October 4, 2013. Community Recreation Center Picket Ornamental Fence Replacement This project will replace the picket ornamental fence at the Community Recreation Center (CRC). The fence is being manufactured now and construction activities are to begin after that is complete. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Rancho California Road This project will rehabilitate Rancho California Road from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road. Project was awarded to R.J. Noble at the July 23, 2013 City Council Meeting. Contractor is preparing the Traffic Control Plans and in the process of obtaining the Encroachment Permit from Caltrans. CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FY 2013-14 The City Council awarded the contract to Above All Names Construction Service at the August 27, 2013 City Council meeting. Construction started on October 24, 2013 and has a 40-working day duration. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Bridge Decks A Contract was awarded to Peterson -Chase General Engineering at the September 24, 2013 City Council meeting. Traffic control plans and other required submittals are being prepared. Due to temperature requirements associated with the methacrylate process, by mutual agreement with the contractor, beginning of construction is delayed until April/May of 2014. Murrieta Creek Bridge -Overland Drive Phase 1 Demolition The City Council awarded the contract to Unlimited Environmental at the September 10, 2013 meeting. the demolition work started on November 4, 2013, and has a 25-working day schedule. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS Special Needs Play Structure This project will install play structure for youth and special needs kids upon completion. The Park and Recreation Subcommittee chose Margarita Park as the site of the improvements based on the conceptual plan. An RFP has been sent out for a purchase/install vendor. Responses were received on May 15, 2013 and are under review. PROJECTS IN DESIGN Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension from Commerce Center to Diaz Rd The project includes the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive to Diaz Road with a bridge over Murrieta Creek. Consultant is preparing an Environmental Assessment and Individual Permit Application for USACE. These applications should be approved by mid -March of 2014. An amendment to the agreement must be prepared to extend the term of the agreement. Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek This project involves the design, environmental clearance, and construction of a new bridge over Murrieta Creek at the westerly terminus of Western Bypass and an extension of Pujol Street to the new structure. Once constructed, this will serve as the southerly connection of the Western Bypass Corridor. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted. Applications to the various environmental agencies have been submitted. Review of the 100% Plans and Specs is on -going. Old Town Gymnasium This projects involves the design of the approximately 9,000 square foot gymnasium adjacent the Boys & Girls Club on Pujol Street. Consultant is finalizing the design plans. Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect The project will provide a Class I bicycle trail that connects the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail at Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail at Diaz Road. The alignment study has been completed. Extension of time for the Bicycle Transportation Account funds was approved on May 1, 2009. The consultant is working on 90% plans, specifications and estimate. 1-15 / SR-79S Ultimate Interchange Target submittal of 95% PS&E (7th) is December 2013. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Winchester Road This project will rehabilitate the portion of Winchester between Jefferson Avenue and Ynez Road. Caltrans has approved the plans and will issue the encroachment permits shortly. Winchester Road is scheduled to bid on the first quarter of 2014. French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 OverCrossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase II Target submittal of 90% PS&E is January 2014. Old Town Temecula Community Theater Remediation City Council approved the plans and specifications at the April 23, 2013 meeting. At the November 12, 2013 meeting, the City Council approve the Old Town Temecula Community Theater ADA Transition Plan. The project will be rebid. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - CITYWIDE, FY 2012/2013 This project will rehabilitate portions of Margarita Road, Ynez Road, Temecula Parkway, Overland Drive, and Old Town Front Street. Consultant submitted 90% plans in mid -July. They are under City review. Various rehabilitation options are being examined. Old Town Front Street Storm Drain This project involves replacement of the cross gutter in Old Town Front Street, approximately 800 feet north of Temecula Parkway. Design alternative involving catch basins on Old Town Front Street and a 'bubbler' system to discharge into the existing parking lot ribbon gutter has been selected. Design work continues. Old YMCA Building Remediation Council approved a design agreement with Meyer and Associates at their September 10, 2013 meeting. Design work is ongoing. Fire Station 73 Living Quarters Upgrade The City Council approved the design contract on September 10, 2013. Consultant is finishing up the conceptual design for the project and is developing a color board. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION FISCAL YEAR 2013 - 2014 Date Submitted: November 6, 2013 Submitted By: Amer Attar Prepared By: Rodney Tidwell 2ND QUARTER Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 FISCAL YEAR TO DATE SCOPE OF WORK Unit Cost WORK COST WORK COST WORK COST WORK COST TOTAL COST FOR COMPLETED i COMPLETED j COMPLETED COMPLETED LAST FISCAL YEAR ASPHALT CONCRETE Square Footage: $2 97 85 $ 250,97 ' $ $ 55,854 $ 165.884 90 $ 233,623 17 Tons: 7,772 7,957 PORTI AND CEMENT CONCRETE Square Footage: $2.97 0 $ - I $ i $ 0 $ $ PCC Yards: 0 $ - $ i $ 0 $ $ STRIPING & PAVEMENT MARKINGS: I Curb & Lines (linear feet): $0 07 19,117 $ 1,338.19 p $ $ 73,884 $ 5,171.88 $ 10,171 70 Painted Legends (each): $8 00 64 $ 512.00 ° $ $ 538 $ 4.304.00 $ 38,624.00 Median Noses (linear feet): $0 07 0 i $ 102 $ - $ 424.97 Raised Pavement Markers (each): 0 $ Thermo Plastic Legends (each): 0 $ SIGNS & BANNERS No of Signs REPLACED: $26.39 84 $ 2,21676 i $ ; $ 195 $ 5,14605 $ 16,071 51 Material (cost per sign): $50,00 I $ 4,200 00 $ $ $ 9,750,00 $ 30,450.00 No of Signs INSTALLED: $26.39 1 1 $ 2639 9 $ [ $ 15 I $ 39585 $ 4,75020 Material (cost per sign): $50.00 j $ � 5000 9 $ _ $ $ 75000 $ 9,00000 No of Signs REPAIRED: $26,39 64 $ 1,68896 ip $ i i $ 282 $ 7,44198 $ 24.463 53 Material (cost per sign): $50.00 $ 3,200 00 i i $ 1 $ $ 14,100 00 $ 46,350 00 No of BANNERS installed: $26.39 0 $ - I i $ i $ 76 $ 2,00564 $ 23,434 32 GRAFFITI REMOVAL No of Locations: 47 t 491 ! Square Footage: 1,360 42,558 i DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANED Catch Basins: $26.39 173 E $ 4,565.47 $ $ 725 $ 19,13275 $ 42,672,63 Down Drains: $26,39 23 $ 606.97 $ $ 23 ; $ 606.97 $ 26.39 Under sidewalk Drains $26 39 9 : $ 237,51 $ I $ 95 € $ 2,507.05 $ 13,960.31 Detention Basins: $26 39 21 $ 554.19 $ $ 50 E $ 1,319,50 $ 2,955.68 TREES TRIMMED No of Trees Trimmed: $26 39 145 I $ 3,826.55 $ - i $ 351 $ 9,262.89 $ 22,273.16 R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT I Area Abated (square feet): $0 034 18,375 $ 624.75 $ € $ 21,375 $ 726,75 $ 2,891 16 —' The Street Maintenance Division also responds to service requests for a variety of other reasons, the total number of Service Order Requests, some of which include work reported above Is reported monthly. SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS i No of SOR's: I 64 230 Personnel assigned to the Street Maintenance Division are on -call and respond to after hours emergencies or support City sponsored special events Overtime Hours: $39.59 81 i $ 3,206,79 $ $ 370 :$ 14,628 51 $ 32,681 55 TOTALS ` $ 27,105.50 $ $ $ 263,134.71 $ 554,824.28 RAMAINTAIMMOACRPTWULY AUG SEPT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of October, 2013 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT Date: 10-15-2013 CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS R.O.W. WEED SPRAYING TRASH AND DEBRIS PICK UP. TOTAL COST $9,654.00 Date: TOTAL COST Date: TOTAL COST Date; TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: WEST COAST ARBORISTS Date: 10-28-2013 CITYWIDE ANNUAL R.O.W. TREE MAINTENANCE. TOTAL COST $1,305.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: PACIFIC STRIPING INC. Date: 10-14-2013 CITYWIDE BI-ANNUAL RE -STRIPING OF ALL ROAD WAY WITHIN IN CITY LIMITS. TOTAL COST $141,913.70 Date: # TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 10,959.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $141,913.70 RAMAINTAIMMOACTRPT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 Date Submitted: November 6, 2013 Submitted By: Amer Attar Prepared By: Rodney Tidwell SCOPE OF WORK JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Year to Date ASPHALT CONCRETE Square Footage Cost $ — 0 W $ _--- 0 - $ �{ 0. $ $ $ 0 $ PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE Square Footage Cost $ 0 - $ 0 - $ $ _ $ $ 0 $ - DRAINAGE FACILITIES Channels (each) Cost 0 0 0 Q — _ $ - $ - _— $ - - _ _ $ _ _ _ $ _ R $ STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS Striping (linear feet) Sandblasting (linear feet) Legends (each) Cost _ 0 0_—� —_ — 0 0 0 0 0 $ _ 8,500.00 $ —�� $_ $150,413.70 TREES Trees Trimmed Trees Removed Cost 0 0 36 36 0 0 µY� — - p _$o----- $ - ------ -- - $ 5,406.00 $ 1.305.00 $ $—��— $ 6 71-1.00 _ — _---- WEED ABATEMENT ROW Area Abated (Square Feet) Other Public Lands Abated (Square Feet) Cost 0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ 0__- 0 $ - $ _7,430.000 $o Y _ $ µ 9.654.00 $ $ $ 17.084.00 ..: MISC. MAINT ACTIVITES Cost -$__ _ $ - - $ ---- -$----------------- =----- ----------- - $ TOTAL CONTRACTED MAINT COSTS $ 8,500.00 $ 7,430.00 $ 5,40600 $ 152,872.70 $ $ - $ 174,208.70 RAMAINTAIN\M0ACRTP\JULY THRU DEC CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 Month I Number ! of Calls f Square I Footage Jul 137 3,193 Aug 169 2,623 Sep 138 2,382 Oct 47 1,360 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals 491 9,558 3,000 i I 2,500 (% 2,000 � U. IJ M N 1,500 I, 1,000 11� 500 0--- Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Square a Number Footage of Calls 180 160 140 120 100 0 80 Zc 60 40 20 0 REQUESTS TO SPEAK City Council Meeting 11/26/13 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA ne9 After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. n� Date v " � Vs a (0 t a o (li✓ I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. Subject ❑ For PV, 6 1 i 6' (0 MAI" WAgainst Pblic Comment a Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. As M11 d#-r Address: City/State/Zip Phone: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: -�� REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA i9s9 After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. / Date Z�. % I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. Subject For ❑ Against Public Comment Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. Name: G ✓�� � � � j w, Phone: �- Address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: ^-Q 0/ Ell/ REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 2 t9ev After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. Date I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. Subject For ❑ Against ❑ Public Comment Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. Phone: 1 If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. Date \\ - 2.(o . N 3 Subject x For ❑ Against ❑ Public Comment I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. Name: 8 �r'C�Jn 1� Phone: Address: � City/State/Zip If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA ue9 After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. Date I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. D Subject ❑ For Against ❑ Public Comment Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. If you are representing an REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA i9ev After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. / Date / /u, / o ` I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. Subject ❑ For Against Public Comment 21"-) P S Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. Address:s'\�� ! �`� City/State/ZipG6 If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA �89 After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. Date Z I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. Subject El For Against Public Comment r Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. Name: ��� l ��A/P 1'IZ _ Phone: City/State/Zip / a S% -I- If you are representing an organization or group, please give the n 0 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA n89 After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. (� _ n -erg Date �� ( I w�is/h two speak on Agenda Item No. i 3 Subject ❑ For ❑ Against 14 Public Comment Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record MAll information provided is optional. Name:` /Jf —P1 L l (IlY�-f§-e, Phong: City/State/Zip If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA isav After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. Date _�/ %. b' / �Z / I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. Subject gez `w L. /'iCi7:* F91-4 f CC For ❑ Against ❑ Public Comment Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record All information provided is optional. Address: State/Zip 14 If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Date V� a xc i I� 0 ( 3 Subject REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the City Clerk. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name for the record. Item No. I `' ish to speak on ❑ For _ /C . -- `' �• - { Against ak o 1 XkrYQ ,(/i®U,�,�I�A��tr �TV� \ ❑ Public Commen� 1 M l t �� ` / y V V ` I I "r Please note that injormation presented at a City Co cil meeting b e c meyublic record MAll information provided is optional. Name: 1 �r 1 ' t 7' 0 j- Phone: City/State/Zip If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: